HomeMy WebLinkAbout015 of 2020 - Diversion of Property Tax for a Community Reinvestment Project Area: 9-Line Interlocal with the Scho1
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
RESOLUTION NO. __________ of 2020
Interlocal Agreement Authorizing Use of a Portion of Tax Increment to Support the
Implementation of the 9 Line Community Reinvestment Area Plan
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF SALT LAKE CITY AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT AUTHORIZING USE OF A PORTION OF TAX INCREMENT TO SUPPORT
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 5, Community Reinvestment, of Title 17C of the Utah
Code (the “Act”), the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (“Agency”) may approve a
community reinvestment project area plan for the purpose of supporting community revitalization
within a designated project area.
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Agency approved the 9 Line Community
Reinvestment Area (“Project Area”) to facilitate the capture of tax increment within the
boundaries of the Project Area which is further depicted in Exhibit A.
WHEREAS, tax increment will be used to support commercial corridors and employment
hubs to support living-wage jobs; attract and expand neighborhood retail and services; provide an
array of housing choices to meet the needs of current residents while attracting new residents
including new families; and increase neighborhood livability and safety.
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City School District (the “District”) has approved the use of its tax
increment from the Project Area to support the community revitalization activities in accordance
with the Act, and doing so will require authorization of an interlocal agreement between the
District and the Agency.
WHEREAS, the parties desire to execute the interlocal agreement in which the District will
consent to the Agency being paid its share of the tax increment from the Project Area and will
detail the Agency’s collection period for the tax increment. The interlocal agreement does not
create an interlocal entity.
R 20-2
R-15-2020
2
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment
Agency of Salt Lake City:
1.It does hereby approve the execution and delivery of the following:
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT [9 LINE COMMUNITY
REINVESTMENT AREA TAX INCREMENT], EFFECTIVE ON THE DATE IT IS
SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES.
2.Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City or
her designee is hereby authorized to approve, execute, and deliver said agreement on behalf
of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, in substantially the same form as now
before the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City Board of Directors and attached hereto
as Exhibit B, subject to such minor changes that do not materially affect the rights and
obligations of the Redevelopment Agency thereunder and as shall be approved by the
Executive Director, her execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of such
approval.
Passed by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, this
________ day of __________, 2020.
Amy Fowler, Chair
Transmitted to the Executive Director on .
The Executive Director:
does not request reconsideration
requests reconsideration at the next regular Agency meeting.
Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director
29th September
Amy Fowler (Oct 12, 2020 11:40 MDT)
Erin Mendenhall (Oct 13, 2020 16:25 MDT)
10/13/2020
4
3
Approved as to form:
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Attest:
City Recorder
Allison Parks, August 26, 2020
Cindy Trishman (Oct 13, 2020 17:02 MDT)
4
EXHIBIT A
[Attach Depiction of Project Area]
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN
RDA Area Boundary
500 South
Redwood RoadI-215Su
r
p
l
u
s
C
a
n
a
l
American Ave.
800 South
300 South
I-80 Ram
p
1000 West 800 West I-15800 South
I-
1
5
700 West1300 South
1400 South 800 West 1000 West Cannon Ave.
Amiga Dr.
1000 South
Jordan Riv
e
r1200 West Post St.Emery St.700 South
Navajo St.1500 West9 Line
Railroad Corridor600 South1000 West 400 South
900 West 900 South
Indiana Avenue
Redwood Road900 West N
9 Line Project Area
Scale: 1” 1100’
9 Line Trail Corridor
Jordan River Corridor
Scale: 1” = 1100’
PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY MAP
5
EXHIBIT B
[Attach Form Interlocal Agreement]
1
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
[9 Line Community Reinvestment Area Tax Increment]
THIS INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is executed
as of __________, 2020 (“Effective Date”), by and between the Redevelopment Agency of Salt
Lake City (the “Agency”) and Board of Education of Salt Lake City School District (the
“District”) (collectively, the “Parties”).
RECITALS
A. Pursuant to Resolution No. R-24-2018 adopted by the Agency on August 21, 2018 and
Ordinance 50-2018 adopted by the Salt Lake City Council on October 2, 2018, the 9 Line
Community Reinvestment Area Plan (the “Project Area Plan”) has been approved, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, which includes the legal description and a map of the 9
Line Community Reinvestment Area (the “Project Area”).
B. Under the Project Area Plan, the Agency desires to support commercial corridors and
employment hubs to support living-wage jobs; attract and expand neighborhood retail and
services; provide an array of housing choices to meet the needs of current residents while attracting
new residents including new families; and increase neighborhood livability and safety.
C. The District has determined that it is in its best interests to provide certain financial
assistance through the use of Tax Increment (as defined below) to Agency for development as set
forth in the Project Area Plan.
D. The Agency anticipates using tax increment (as defined in Utah Code § 17C-1-102(60))
(“Tax Increment”) created by development activities in the Project Area to assist in development
as set forth in the Project Area Plan.
E. Utah Code § 17C-5-204 authorizes the District to consent to the payment to the Agency
of a portion of its share of Tax Increment generated from the Project Area for the purposes set
forth in the Project Area Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows:
1. District’s Consent. Pursuant to Utah Code § 17C-5-204, the District hereby agrees
and consents that the Agency shall be entitled to retain seventy-five percent (75%) of the
District’s portion of the Tax Increment from the Project Area for a term of twenty (20) years
beginning with the 2021 tax year. The calculation of annual Tax Increment shall be made using
(a) Salt Lake County’s then current tax levy rate for the District, and (b) the 2016 base year
taxable value of $228,048,136, which taxable value is subject to adjustment as required by law.
The District shall be entitled to the remaining 25% its Tax Increment each year during the
specified twenty (20) year period.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
2
2. Budget. Pursuant to Utah Code § 17C-5-204(6)(c), a copy of the Project Area budget
is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
3. Interlocal Cooperation Act. In satisfaction of the requirements of Utah Code § 11-
13, et seq. (the “Interlocal Cooperation Act”) in connection with this Agreement, the Parties
agree as follows:
a. This Agreement shall be authorized and adopted by resolution of the legislative
body of each Party pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of Section 11-13-202.5 of
the Interlocal Cooperation Act.
b. This Agreement shall be reviewed as to proper form and compliance with
applicable law by a duly authorized attorney on behalf of each Party pursuant to and in accordance
with the Section 11-13-202.5(3) of the Interlocal Cooperation Act.
c. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, each Party shall be responsible
for its own costs of any action taken pursuant to this Agreement, and for any financing of such
costs.
d. A duly executed original counterpart of this Agreement shall be filed imm ediately
with the keeper of records of each Party pursuant to Section 11-13-209 of the Interlocal
Cooperation Act.
e. No separate legal entity is created by the terms of this Agreement. The Executive
Director of the Agency is hereby designated the administrator for all purposes of the Interlocal
Cooperation Act, pursuant to Section 11-13-207 of the Interlocal Cooperation Act.
f. Following the execution of this Agreement by each of the Parties, each Party shall
cause a notice regarding this Agreement to be published in accordance with Section 11-13-219 of
the Interlocal Cooperation Act.
g. No real or personal property shall be acquired jointly by the Parties as a result of
this Agreement. To the extent a Party acquires, holds, or disposes of any real or personal property
for use in the joint or cooperative undertaking contemplated by this Agreement, such Party shall
do so in the same manner that it deals with other property of such Party.
4. Modification and Amendment. Any modification of or amendment to any
provision of this Agreement shall be effective only if the modification or amendment is in writing
and signed by each of the Parties. Any oral representation or modification concerning this
Agreement shall be of no force or effect.
5. Further Assurance. Each of the Parties hereto agrees to cooperate in good faith
with the other, to execute and deliver such further documents, to adopt any resolutions, to take any
other official action, and to perform such other acts as may be reasonably necessary or appropriate
to consummate and carry into effect the transactions contemplated under this Agreement.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
3
6. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and
interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of Utah.
7. Authorization. Each of the Parties hereto represents and warrants to the other that
the warranting Party has taken all steps, including the publication of public notice where necessary,
in order to authorize the execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement by each such
Party.
Executed to be effective as of the Effective Date.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE
CITY
Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director
Approved as to form:
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
___________________________________
Allison Parks
Attest:
___________________________________
Salt Lake City Recorder
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SALT LAKE CITY
SCHOOL DISTRICT
Janet Roberts, Business Administrator
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
3/5/2020
4
EXHIBIT A
[Attach Project Area Plan]
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 1
9 LINE
COMMUNITY
REINVESTMENT AREA
PLAN
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY I DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA
PLAN
RDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS
James Rogers, District 1
Andrew Johnston, District 2
Chris Wharton, District 3
Derek Kitchen, District 4
Erin Mendenhall, District 5
Charlie Luke, District 6
Amy Fowler, District 7
MAYOR
RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Jacqueline M. Biskupski
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
RDA CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Lara Fritts
RDA CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Danny Walz
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 3
CONTENTS
i) INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................4
1) COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ANALYSIS (17C-5-105) ................................................7
1(a): PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................8
1(b): EXISTING LAND USES AND NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT ...........................................................9
1(c): STANDARDS TO GUIDE PROJECT AREA DEVELOPMENT .........................................................15
1(d): FURTHERING PURPOSES OF UTAH TITLE 17C .....................................................................16
1(e): GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ...........................................................................................21
1(f): ELIMINATION OR REDUCTION OF BLIGHT ............................................................................21
1(g): SPECIFIC PROJECT AREA DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................21
1(h): PROCESS OF SELECTING PARTICIPANTS .............................................................................21
1(i): REASON FOR SELECTING THE PROJECT AREA ......................................................................22
1(j): EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, ECONOMIC CONDITIONS .........................................................23
1(k): FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE OFFERED TO PARTICIPANTS ...........................................................28
1(l): PUBLIC BENEFIT ANALYSIS SUMMARY ................................................................................29
1(m): HISTORIC PRESERVATION .................................................................................................31
1(n): INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT .................................................................................................31
1(o): OTHER INFORMATION - GEOGRAPHIC FOCUS AREAS ............................................................31
1(o): OTHER INFORMATION - COMMUNITY OUTREACH ..................................................................32
2) PROJECT AREA BUDGET (17C-5-303) ......................................................................35
1(a): BASE TAXABLE VALUE .......................................................................................................36
1(b): PROJECTED AMOUNT OF TIF ..............................................................................................36
1(c): COLLECTION PERIOD ........................................................................................................36
1(d): TIF PAID TO OTHER TAXING ENTITIES ................................................................................36
1(e): IF TIF COLLECTION AREA IS LESS THAN CRA BOUNDARY .....................................................36
1(f): PERCENTAGE OF TIF AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE ....................................................................37
1(g): MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE DOLLAR AMOUNT ...........................................................................37
2: SALES AND USE TAX REVENUE ..............................................................................................37
3: PROJECT AREA FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT THIS CRA PLAN ...........................................................37
4: RDA’S COMBINED INCREMENTAL VALUE .................................................................................38
5: PROJECT AREA FUNDS USED FOR ADMINISTRATION ................................................................38
6: EXPECTED SALES PRICE FOR PROPERTY THE RDA OWNS .........................................................38
ATTACHMENT A: PROJECT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND MAP
ATTACHMENT B: DEFINITIONS
ATTACHMENT C: PROJECT AREA BENEFITS ANALYSIS AND BUDGET
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 4
iINTRODUCTION
Through this 9 Line Community Reinvestment Area Plan (“Plan”), the Redevelopment Agency of Salt
Lake City (“RDA”), contemplates the creation of a Community Reinvestment Area (“CRA”) to utilize
tax increment as a funding mechanism to implement the community vision that has been established
through the Westside Master Plan and that has been reaffirmed through the community engagement
process utilized to develop this Plan. In addition, the creation of a CRA will assist in closing the
gap in identified disparities by providing housing stability, economic development, and improved
neighborhood conditions.
COMMUNITY OVERVIEW
The 9 Line Community Reinvestment Area (“Project Area”) is located less than two miles from
downtown Salt Lake City, and spans the communities of Poplar Grove to the north and Glendale
to the south. The area is characterized by single-family neighborhoods, industrial uses, and
small to mid-scale commercial centers. In addition, the area is rich with natural and recreational
resources, including several parks and two trail corridors.
Despite having tremendous strengths, the area has experienced some important disparities from
the city as a whole. As compared to the city, the Project Area has a higher rate of poverty, a lower
median household income, and a lower rate of educational attainment. Neighborhood conditions,
as compared to other areas of the city, may act as a barrier to fair housing and limit access to
opportunity.
Vacant, underutilized, and neglected properties have impacted the surrounding neighborhood’s
potential for revitalization. This has limited private sector investment and the development of
neighborhood amenities that enhance residents’ quality of life.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 5
Existing neighborhood assets include
unparalleled natural areas, parks, trails, and
green space. Although the highway system
has created geographic barriers that limit
physical connectivity, the neighborhood is in
close proximity to downtown and employment
centers. Commercial and light industrial
centers, while currently underutilized, have
the potential to act as economic drivers if they
are better leveraged to ensure local impact.
In addition, the Project Area has a number
of significant local and community-based
institutions that can engage as partners in
community improvement efforts. Perhaps
the greatest asset of the neighborhood is the
diverse, youthful, and engaged population,
which will be essential in furthering
neighborhood revitalization activities.
NEIGHBORHOOD NODES
Many of the area’s residents are optimistic that
revitalization will occur within the Poplar Grove and
Glendale neighborhoods to enhance strong, stable
residential communities connected by recreational
opportunities and vibrant community activity centers.
Through the Westside Master Plan, these activity
centers, also referred to as community and neighborhood
nodes, are areas that have been identified for growth and
development. As such, this Plan identifies these nodes
as geographic areas to target RDA programs, tools, and
resources.
As neighborhood change occurs, it is
important that policies and practices promote
equitable development that considers existing
residential groups while also serving the
needs of a growing and changing community.
Flexibility has been built into this plan to
allow for modifications as conditions evolve.
BUILDING ON STRENGTHS
This Plan sets forth Goals, Objectives, and Tactics for the utilization of tax increment to leverage
the neighborhood’s existing assets while encouraging commercial revitalization, housing stability,
economic development, and enhancement of the public realm.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 6
PLAN REQUIREMENTS
This Plan complies with the community reinvestment project area plan requirements as per Utah
Code Title 17C-5-101. The RDA does not anticipate using eminent domain within the Project
Area. Since the RDA is not carrying out a blight study or a blight determination, the Project Area
is authorized through interlocal agreements with individual taxing entities, rather than a taxing
entity committee.
As per 17C-5-108, prior to adopting a board resolution, the RDA Board of Directors (Board) has
determined that the Plan:
• Contains a boundary description of the Project Area
• Contains the RDA’s purposes and intent with respect to the Project Area
• Serves a public purpose
• Produces a public benefit as per 17C-5-105(2)
• Is economically sound and feasible
• Conforms to the community’s general plan
• Promotes the public peace, health, safety, and welfare of the community
PLAN & POLICY COORDINATION
Salt Lake City has recently carried out various planning efforts focused citywide as well as
specific to the westside. As components of the city’s general plan, these efforts have established
a clear vision for future development, and are based on extensive data gathering and community
engagement. It is important that this Plan draws from, builds upon, and integrates these prior
plans and studies. Plans referenced and the hierarchy of the these plans is outlined below.
IMPLEMENTATION
PLANS & STRATEGIES
COMMUNITY &
SMALL AREA PLANS
CITY SYSTEM PLANSCITYWIDE VISION
• Plan Salt Lake • Pedestrian &
Bicycle Master
Plan
• Transit Master
Plan
• Grow SLC: A
5-Year Housing
Plan
• Other plans
• Westside Master
Plan
• 9 Line Corridor
Master Plan
• 9 Line
Community
Reinvestment
Area Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 7
1COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ANALYSIS
OVERVIEW
Section 1 of the Plan fulfills requirements of 17C-5-105(1), and includes the following
information:
a. Project Area Boundary Description
b. Existing Land Uses and Neighborhood Context
c. Standards To Guide Project Area Development
d. Furthering Purposes of Utah Title 17C
e. General Plan Consistency
f. Elimination or Reduction of Blight
g. Specific Project Area Development
h. Process of Selecting Participants
i. Reasons for Selecting the Project Area
j. Existing Physical, Social, and Economic Conditions
k. Financial Assistance to be Offered to Participants
l. Public Benefit Analysis Results
m. Historic Preservation Requirements
n. Interlocal Agreement
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 8
RDA Area Boundary
500 South
Redwood RoadI-215Su
r
p
l
u
s
C
a
n
a
l
American Ave.
800 South
300 South
I-80 Ram
p
1000 West 800 West I-15800 South
I-
1
5
700 West1300 South
1400 South 800 West 1000 West Cannon Ave.
Amiga Dr.
1000 South
Jordan Riv
e
r1200 West Post St.Emery St.700 South
Navajo St.1500 West9 Line
Railroad Corridor600 South1000 West 400 South
900 West 900 South
Indiana Avenue
Redwood Road900 West N
9 Line Project Area
Scale: 1” 1100’
9 Line Trail Corridor
Jordan River Corridor
Scale: 1” = 1100’
1(a): PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION
The project area is generally defined by the north/south alignment of 900 West from I-80 on the
north and 1400 South on the south, and the east/west alignment of Indiana Avenue (800 South)
from I-215 on the west and I-15 on the east. In addition to portions of the 900 South, Indiana
Avenue, and Redwood Road corridors, the project area also includes a large underutilized area
west of Redwood Road, as well as portions of the 9 Line and Jordan River Parkway trail corridors.
Refer to Exhibit A for a complete legal description of the Project Area.
FIGURE 1.1: PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY MAP
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 9
1(b): EXISTING LAND USES AND NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
This section includes a general statement of the existing land uses, layout of principal streets,
population densities, and building intensities of the Project Area and how each will be affected
by the project area development.
FIGURE 1.2: LAND USE ZONING MAP
LAND USES
The 738 parcel-acreage Project Area includes a range of land uses, including single-family
residential, multifamily residential, industrial, commercial, parks and open space, schools, and
publically-owned facilities. Through redevelopment, some existing structures may be demolished
or renovated, new buildings may be constructed, and the reuse of existing buildings for new uses
may occur. In addition, infrastructure upgrades, streetscape improvements, and public space
enhancements may occur.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 10
• MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Multifamily residential uses, currently
comprising 1% of current land uses and
5% of zoned area, are primarily located
in the northeastern portion of the Project
Area between 900 South and I-80. As
project area development occurs, additional
well-designed and contextually-sensitive
multifamily and mixed-use residential
development is anticipated to occur near
commercial and neighborhood nodes to
diversity the housing stock.
TABLE 1.1: CURRENT LAND USES
Property Type Acres % of Total
Tax Exempt 185.66 25%
Residential 235.53 32%
Commercial 45.4 6%
Industrial 124.12 17%
Vacant 103.55 14%
Office 10.85 1%
Residual Road, Right-of-Ways & Easements 33.04 4%
TOTAL 738.15 100%
Anticipated Changes by Land Use:
The land use changes are intended to enhance stable residential neighborhoods; facilitate
commercial revitalization; strengthen employment centers; improve gateways and connectivity
between the westside and adjacent areas of Salt Lake City; and to reinforce the area as a primary
destination for outdoor recreation.
• SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Single-family residential uses, currently comprising about 30% of current land uses and
zoned area, are concentrated between 800 West and Redwood Road. As project area
development occurs, single-family uses are not anticipated to be expanded. However
residential rehabilitation and infill development will likely occur within existing single-
family neighborhoods. In addition, moderate-density residential development - including
townhouses, fourplexes, courtyard apartments, or live-work units - is anticipated to occur near
neighborhood commercial nodes to diversify the housing stock.
FIGURE 1.3: RESIDENTIAL AND MIXED-USE ZONING
SINGLE FAMILY ZONING
MULTI FAMILY ZONING
MIXED USE ZONING
FORM BASED ZONING
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 11
• INDUSTRIAL
Manufacturing uses, comprising 17% of
current land uses and 29% of zoned area, are
concentrated in areas west of Redwood Road
and between I-15 and 800 West. As project area
development occurs, the light manufacturing
zone between I-15 and 800 West should be
reevaluated to determine whether a new zone is
more appropriate to encourage uses conducive
to a neighborhood setting. In addition, the light
manufacturing zone west of Redwood Road
should be reevaluated to determine if a new
zoning type is more supportive to multimodal
corridor development by allowing commercial
development with a more measured approach to
building and site design.
• COMMERCIAL & OFFICE
Commercial and office uses, comprising 7%
of current land uses and 16% of zoned area,
are concentrated to areas along the Redwood
Road corridor, with smaller pockets located at
the Indiana Avenue at Navajo Street node, and
along the 900 West corridor. As project area
development occurs, commercial and office uses
will be integrated into mixed-use neighborhood
and community nodes.
ZONEDCURRENT USE
Acres% of
Total
Acres% of
Total
INDUSTRIAL20529%13117%
COMMERCIAL / OFFICE10214%526%
TOTAL307183
FIGURE 1.4: LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONING
FIGURE 1.5: COMMERCIAL ZONING
TABLE X: INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCIAL / OFFICE ZONING
COMMERCIAL ZONING
MIXED USE ZONING
FORM BASED ZONING
LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONING
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 12
• PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
Parks and open spaces uses includes the
Jordan River and 9 Line corridors, Jordan Park,
and other neighborhood parks. According to the
Westside Master Plan, 83% of the residential
properties in the westside are within a quarter-
mile of public green space. As project area
development occurs, project area acreage
dedicated to park and open space uses is
not anticipated to be expanded. However,
enhancements to existing park and trail
infrastructure is anticipated to occur.
OPEN SPACE ZONING
PARK ACRES ADDRESS
Jordan River Park 34 1060 S 900 West
International Peace Gardens 12 1060 S 900 West
9th South River Park 4.5 1000 S Genesee Ave
Poplar Grove Park 6.75 800 S Emery Street
Bend in the River Park 4.25 1054 W Fremont Dr
Modesto Park 5 1175 S 1000 West
Post Street Tot Lot 0.5 487 S Post Street
Bike Pump Track 1.3 700 West 900 South
FIGURE 1.6: OPEN SPACE ZONING
TABLE 1.2: SIGNIFICANT PARKS
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 13
LAYOUT OF PRINCIPAL STREETS
The streets in the Project Area are set in a grid pattern, with the exception of a few streets that
run along or near the Jordan River. The following streets within the Project Area are identified as
part of the Transit Master Plan’s Frequent Transit Network: Redwood Road, California Avenue,
400 South, 900 West, 900 South, and Indiana Avenue. Interstate highways delimit the Project
Area to the west, north, and east (I-215, I-80, and I-15, respectively). 400 South and 1300
South/California Avenue are important east-west arterial streets that access I-15 and the east
side of Salt Lake City, while east-west arterial streets 800 South and 900 South also handle a
large volume of traffic because they connect to downtown Salt Lake City.
Source: Salt Lake City Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan,
December 2015, Figure 6-4 Bicycling Network Existing
Conditions + Short Term (0-10 Years) Recommendations
Map
509
513
217
516
516
509
513
217 15 min.
30 min./60 min.
twice AM/twice PM
30 min.
Bus Frequency
Source: www.rideuta.com, Rider Tools,
Schedules & Maps, September 2016
Bus Route
9 Line Project Area Proposed and Existing
Transportation
Scale: 1” 1100’
RDA Area Boundary
I-15 N
I-15 S (HOV)
I-215
Freeway
Access
N
FIGURE 1.7: TRANSPORTATION MAP
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 14
POPULATION DENSITIES
The population density of the CRA Area east of Redwood Road is estimated to be 10.2 people
per acre.* With a lack of residential zoning in the western region of the Project Area, the
population density west of Redwood Road is estimated to be few to zero.
Population densities are anticipated to increase in the Project Area, in part because the
Westside Mater Plan calls for nodes along 900 West, Indiana Avenue, and Redwood Road to be
developed for increased residential density and appropriately-scaled mixed-use and commercial
development. It is anticipated that some of the current uses in the Project Area could transition
into medium- and high-density residential and mixed use developments, while the areas that are
currently low-density residential shall maintain that character. Overall, the increases in building
intensities at specific nodes (discussed below) shall result in increased population densities.
*Note: The population density for the CRA Area east of Redwood Road was calculated by dividing the population by the land area of
the following census block groups: Census Tract 1026, Block Groups 2, 3; Census Tract 1027.01, Block Groups 1, 2, 3; and Census
Tract 1028.01, Block Groups 2, 3
BUILDING INTENSITIES
Buildings in the area are generally single or two-story residential structures, with large-footprint
commercial, institutional and light manufacturing located in the eastern and western portions
of the project area. The latter typically can be characterized as large buildings surrounded by
surface parking.
New increased intensity, mixed-use projects are anticipated to be developed at targeted nodes.
Commercial and mixed-use development will add density where appropriate while preserving the
character of single-family neighborhoods. As per the Westside Master Plan, the following nodes
have been identified for growth and development:
• 900 West at 400 South
• 900 West at 700 South
• 900 West at 800 South
• 900 West at California Avenue
• 900 West at 900 South
• 900 South at the Jordan River
• Indiana Avenue at Navajo Street/Pueblo Street
• Redwood Road at Indiana Avenue
• Redwood Road at 900 South
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 15
1. Promote reinvestment and redevelopment in
the Westside community through changes
in land use, improved public infrastructure
and community investment to spur
development that meets the community’s
vision while maintaining the character of
Westside’s existing stable neighborhoods.
2. Protect and encourage ongoing investment
in existing, low-density residential
neighborhoods while providing well
designed, compatible and high density
residential development where needed,
appropriate or desired.
3. Recognize, develop and foster
opportunities for unique, mixed use
neighborhood and community nodes in the
Westside that reflect the diverse nature of
the community and provide resources to
allow for their growth.
4. Recognize, develop and foster
opportunities for regional nodes that
strengthen the community’s employment base
while providing large-scale commercial
retail and services for residents and
employees of the Westside.
5. Make the Westside a destination
synonymous with recreation, trails, open
space and the outdoors by celebrating
and spotlighting the Jordan River, the
Jordan River Parkway, the 9 Line and the
community’s parks and natural spaces.
6. Enhance and expand the internal network
of assets, nodes and resources ensuring
that all residents and employees in the
Westside have access to goods, services
and activities and the opportunity to walk
or bicycle safely to them.
7. Strengthen the connections both within and
between the Westside and other parts of Salt
Lake City by improving the community’s
gateways and corridors and strengthening
the transportation network for all modes of
travel.
8. Maintain the stability of the industrial
districts and the employment base in the
community while incorporating appropriate
land use buffers and urban design features
to soften the transition between them and
adjacent neighborhoods.
9. Create a beautiful community with
a system of guidelines to create and
strengthen public spaces that will foster
community interaction and pride and
catalyze ongoing redevelopment and
growth.
1(c): STANDARDS TO GUIDE PROJECT AREA DEVELOPMENT
The goals set forth in the Westside Master Plan shall be used as the standards to guide project
area development, as follows:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 16
1(d): FURTHERING PURPOSES OF UTAH TITLE 17C
By implementing the CRA Plan, the RDA shall leverage private investment with tax increment
financing to provide redevelopment opportunities, create and preserve affordable housing, and
enhance neighborhood livability. Implementation shall be carried out through the following
objectives and tactics.
TACTICS:
a. Develop and maintain an inventory of vacant, blighted,
and underutilized properties to strategically prioritize for
RDA programs and tools.
b. Implement a program to incentivize the adaptive reuse of
underutilized or economically distressed buildings into a
more productive use.
c. Identify catalytic project sites to target for redevelopment.
Projects must be sufficient in location and scope
to encourage complimentary revitalization efforts
on surrounding properties. The identification and
implementation of catalytic projects will spur economic
development and job creation, assist in revitalizing
commercial nodes, and expand housing opportunities.
d. Collaborate with Salt Lake City’s Civil Enforcement to
ensure that ordinances and regulations are enforced,
with focus on properties with repeat code violations
that detract from the neighborhood’s quality of life and
wellbeing.
e. Ensure that redevelopment activities support high-quality,
enduring projects and promote sound architectural and
urban design principles to encourage safe, sustainable,
and livable neighborhoods.
f. Collaborate with Salt Lake City’s Division of Planning to
ensure zoning is conducive to neighborhood revitalization
and master plan implementation.
OBJECTIVE1 NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION
UNDERUTILIZED LAND IS RETURNED TO A PRODUCTIVE USE THROUGH
A REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF NEGLECTED BUILDINGS AND
VACANT LOTS TO REDUCE CRIME AND IMPROVE THE PHYSICAL
ENVIRONMENT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 17
TACTICS:
a. Work with Salt Lake City’s Planning Division to adapt
land use and zoning policies to allow a mix of uses on the
ground floor of buildings at strategic locations along the
900 South and Indiana Avenue corridors.
b. Target RDA programs and tools to leverage private
investment for the revitalization of existing commercial
and retail space while avoiding the displacement of
established, locally-owned businesses.
c. Consider developing project area-specific programs to
incentivize locally-owned businesses to purchase and
rehabilitate commercial space to operate their businesses
from.
d. Diversify the mix of businesses and services to leverage
local demand that is not being captured.
e. Encourage neighborhood-serving uses to increase access
to fresh food, day cares, and other services that promote
health and well-being.
f. Enhance commercial corridors to not only create safe,
pedestrian-friendly streets, but also to encourage private
investment for commercial revitalization.
g. Target RDA programs and tools to revitalize distressed
commercial space by offsetting the cost of code
compliance and facade improvements.
OBJECTIVE2 COMMERCIAL NODES & CORRIDORS
NEW AND REVITALIZED COMMERCIAL SPACE THAT SUPPORTS
THRIVING STORES AND RESTAURANTS LOCATED AT NODES
CONNECTED BY PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS.
LOCAL AND REGIONAL NEEDS ARE SERVED THROUGH THE RETENTION
OF EXISTING BUSINESSES, WITH THE ADDITION OF NEW RETAIL,
COMMERCIAL, AND SERVICES TO THE AREA.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 18
TACTICS:
a. Ensure appropriate levels of office, commercial, and
retail spaces are integrated into redevelopment projects
to create synergies between uses and encourage a
critical mass of people.
b. Work with Salt Lake City’s Business Development team
to retain, recruit, and expand businesses within the
Project Area.
c. Work with Salt Lake City’s Planning Division to
determine planning and zoning solutions to develop
buffers between industrial and residential uses, and to
encourage transitional uses that are more conducive to a
neighborhood setting.
d. Target redevelopment activities to improve the interface
between industrial and residential neighborhoods.
e. Encourage the development of active employment
centers in transitioning industrial areas to provide
livable-wage jobs and enhance business prosperity.
f. Target RDA resources for land revitalization efforts in
transitioning industrial areas to facilitate previously
contaminated land to be put back into productive use.
OBJECTIVE3 EMPLOYMENT CENTERS
ACTIVE AND VITAL EMPLOYMENT CENTERS TO SUPPORT THE
RECRUITMENT, RETENTION, AND EXPANSION OF BUSINESSES TO
PROVIDE HIGH-WAGE JOBS AND ECONOMIC PROSPERITY.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 19
OBJECTIVE4 HOUSING
HIGH-QUALITY HOUSING OPTIONS TO PROVIDE HOUSING STABILITY
FOR EXISTING RESIDENTS AND ESTABLISH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS
AN OPTION FOR ECONOMICALLY-DIVERSE INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES.
TACTICS:
a. Implement a model high-quality, context-sensitive
multifamily or mixed-use project to demonstrate a
successful mid-density project.
b. Target RDA resources to promote new construction,
rehabilitation, and adaptive reuse for a diverse range
of housing options, from affordable to market rate, to
accommodate a range of household incomes.
c. Collaborate with Salt Lake City’s Division of Housing and
Neighborhood Development to stabilize and improve the
existing single-family housing stock.
d. Consider utilizing the Salt Lake City Community Land
Trust and deed restrictions to capture the value of public
investment to preserve long-term affordability.
e. Utilize RDA programs and tools to support the
implementation of mixed-income, mixed-use, and
multifamily residential targeted to appropriate locations
that are compatible with existing development.
f. Utilize RDA programs and tools to support the
implementation of infill development within existing
single-family neighborhoods, with focus on mid-density
housing types including duplexes, townhouses, courtyard
apartments, and accessory dwelling units (will require a
zoning update).
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 20
OBJECTIVE5 PUBLIC SPACES & TRANSPORTATION
A HEALTHY AND SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOOD WITH REGIONAL
CONNECTIVITY, A UNIQUE IDENTITY, ACCESS TO OPEN SPACE, SAFE
STREETS, ACCESSIBILITY TO ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND
MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION.
TACTICS:
a. Promote the community’s unique identity through public
art, signage, gateway markers, and other art amenities in
parks, street corridors, and gateways to the neighborhood.
b. Collaborate with the Transportation Division to improve
pedestrian safety, walkability, and neighborhood
connectivity through street and trail improvements,
to include bicycle amenities, public transportation
enhancements, traffic calming, safety improvements, and
streetscaping.
c. Enhance active recreation opportunities, including trail
improvements, community gardens, access points,
facilities, safety improvements at trail/street crossings,
and park amenities.
d. Improve neighborhood parks and plazas to enhance
passive recreation and gathering spaces.
e. Integrate sustainable design features and green
infrastructure into projects to mitigate impacts of new
development and promote a resilient urban environment.
f. Collaborate with the Salt Lake City Arts Council to
identify opportunities to integrate public art into
community spaces.
g. Work with developers and property owners to integrate
publically-accessible space into privately-owned and
managed developments.
h. As population density increases, ensure adequate public
space is available to serve neighborhood needs.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 21
1(e): GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Westside Master Plan is the current community general plan for the Project Area. The Project
Area Plan is consistent with the Westside Master Plan’s goals and objectives of developing
mixed-use nodes at the neighborhood, community, and regional scales, creating a network of
neighborhood destinations for residents, improving mobility, promoting recreation, strengthening
connections both within and between the Westside and other neighborhoods, and providing a
growing economic and employment base for Salt Lake City.
The construction of all new buildings and improvements and the rehabilitation of any existing
buildings or improvements in the Project Area will be done in accordance with the standards set
forth in the Westside Master Plan, and the 9 Line Corridor Master Plan, as well as citywide plans
(including the Community Housing Plan, Transit Master Plan, Pedestrian and Bicycle Master
Plan, Sustainable Salt Lake Plan, and Plan Salt Lake).
Building permits for construction or rehabilitation will be issued by the City in order to assure
that project area development is consistent with the Westside Master Plan and City ordinances.
1(f): ELIMINATION OR REDUCTION OF BLIGHT
The RDA is not carrying out a blight study to make a determination of blight. However, project
area development activities are anticipated to revitalize neglected buildings and infrastructure,
and put vacant and underutilized land into a more productive use.
1(g): SPECIFIC PROJECT AREA DEVELOPMENT
Specific projects and project sites have not been identified. Rather, project area development
activities will facilitate housing and community revitalization activities as further described in
Section 1(d).
1(h): PROCESS OF SELECTING PARTICIPANTS
The RDA may enter into participation agreements (also known as tax increment reimbursement
agreements) with property owners within the project area, for the purpose of providing incentives
in the form of tax increment to redevelop the property. Program participants shall be selected
through an evaluation process as per the RDA’s Tax Increment Reimbursement Policy. Potential
participants must provide sufficient evidence that tax increment funding is necessary for the
proposed project to succeed. In addition, the proposed project must align with project area
objectives and involve significant private investment so as to assure adequate yield of tax
increment.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 22
1(i): REASON FOR SELECTING THE PROJECT AREA
After conducting research into each of the above evaluation criteria, it was determined by the
Board that the 9 Line Project Area met the selection criteria and was selected as a proposed
project area by vote of the Board members. Some of the reasons for this selection included the
following:
• Opportunity to improve east-west connectivity between neighborhoods in the 9 Line
Project Area to other parts of the city to the east.
• Opportunity to implement some of the specific and well-established goals of the 2014
Westside Master Plan.
• Opportunities for infrastructure improvements to improve residential areas and to attract
commercial, retail, and mixed-use development.
• Opportunity for large-scale commercial development, especially west of Redwood Road.
• Existing commercial nodes at intersections that could be strengthened and reinforced
using RDA financing tools.
• Opportunity to diversify the housing stock.
• Open space and recreational opportunities along the Jordan River and 9 Line corridors
that can be preserved/promoted.
• Conformance with the Salt Lake County Project Area Creation Policy.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 23
1(j): EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
The following is a demographic profile of the Project Area, including a snapshot of social,
economic, and physical conditions. The data sets used for this existing conditions analysis
are primarily U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year estimate
data, taken from all the Census tract block groups that most closely align with the Project Area
boundaries. Although these block group boundaries are close to the Project Area boundaries,
they do not fall exactly within them, so some of the data displayed in this section might reflect
properties and conditions of the surrounding neighborhood.
FIGURE 1.8: AGE STRUCTURE - SALT LAKE CITY & 9 LINE PROJECT AREA
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Note: 9 Line Project Area study boundaries include Census Tract 1026, Block Group 2, 3; Census Tract 1027.01; Census Tract 1028.01
Residents living in the 9 Line Project Area and surrounding neighborhood are younger than the
population of the city as a whole, as shown in Figure 1.8. About 30% of 9 Line residents are
under the age of 18, as compared to 22% of citywide residents.
FIGURE 1.9
HISPANIC POPULATION:
9 LINE PROJECT AREA & SALT LAKE CITY
FIGURE 1.10
2016 SCHOOL ENROLMENT - HISPANIC & MINORITY:
9 LINE PROJECT AREA SCHOOLS
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-15 ACS 5-Yr Estimates
Note: 9 Line Project Area study boundaries include Tract 1026
Block Group 2, 3; Tract 1027.01; Tract 1028.01
Source: Salt Lake City School District
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 24
The Project Area is diverse, about 47% of the population is Hispanic or Latino, compared to just
21% for the city as a whole, as shown in Figure 1.9. The school-age population is more diverse
than the Project Area average, with racial and ethnic minorities accounting for between 85% and
93% of elementary school enrolment, as demonstrated in Figure 1.10.
FIGURE 1.11
2016 SCHOOL ENROLMENT
% OF STUDENTS QUALIFYING FOR
FREE OR REDUCED LUNCH -
9 LINE PROJECT AREA SCHOOLS
Source: Salt Lake City School District
Note: A student from a household with an income
between at or below 130% of the poverty threshold
is eligible for free school lunch, while a student from
a household above 130% and up to 185% of the
poverty threshold is eligible for reduced lunch.
The vast majority (86% - 97%) of elementary-age children who attend schools that draw from the
Project Area are eligible for free or reduced lunch, as demonstrated in Figure 1.11. The federal
poverty level income threshold or a family of four is $24,300. A student from a household with
an income of up to 130% of the federal poverty level ($31,590 for a family of four) is eligible
for free lunch. A student from a household with an income above 130% and up to 185% of the
federal poverty level ($44,955 for a family of four) is eligible for reduced lunch.
FIGURE 1.12
POVERTY RATES: INDIVIDUALS & FAMILIES -
9 LINE PROJECT AREA, SALT LAKE CITY,
SALT LAKE COUNTY
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-15 ACS 5-Yr Estimates
Note: 9 Line Project Area study boundaries include Tract 1026 Block Group 2, 3; Tract 1027.01; Tract 1028.01
As demonstrated in Figure 1.12, over 35% of individuals and 31% of families residing in the
area are living in poverty according to the U.S. Census Bureau. This is significantly higher than
the citywide and countywide averages.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 25
FIGURE 1.13
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
9 LINE PROJECT AREA &
SALT LAKE CITY
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-15 ACS 5-Yr Estimates
Note: 9 Line Project Area study boundaries include Tract 1026 Block Group 2, 3; Tract
1027.01; Tract 1028.01
FIGURE 1.14
AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE
9 LINE PROJECT AREA &
SALT LAKE CITY
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-15 ACS 5-Yr Estimates
Note: 9 Line Project Area study boundaries include Tract 1026 Block Group 2, 3; Tract
1027.01; Tract 1028.01
The median household income for the Project Area and surrounding neighborhood is $39,420,
which is 83% of the city’s median of $47,243, as shown in Figure 1.13. This is particularly
significant because, as shown in Figure 1.14, the Project Area’s average household size is
significantly larger than the city as a whole, 3.31 compared to 2.47 people.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 26
FIGURE 1.15
% OF HOUSING UNITS BY THE NUMBER
OF UNITS IN THE STRUCTURE -
9 LINE PROJECT AREA
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-15 ACS 5-Yr Estimates
Note: 9 Line Project Area study boundaries include Tract 1026 Block Group 2, 3;
Tract 1027.01; Tract 1028.01
The Project Area has more
homeowners than renters, 58%
to 42%. Citywide, it is more of an
even split with 48% of household
being homeowners and 52% being
renters. As demonstrated in Figure
1.15, single-family residential
comprises 80% of the housing
units in the Project Area, with few
high-density, muti-family residential
units.
Source: Bureau of Economic and Business Research,
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Fair Housing
Equity Assessment, 2014
According to a 2014 Fair Housing Equity Assessment completed by the Bureau of Economic
and Business Research (now the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute) at the University of Utah, the
westside of Salt Lake City, including the Project Area, is considered a low opportunity area. The
index measures school proficiency, poverty, labor market engagement, housing stability, and job
access. The general geographical area of the Project Area is shown in the black box in Figure
1.16.FIGURE 1.16
STANDARDIZED OPPORTUNITY INDEX
BY CENSUS TRACT -
SALT LAKE CITY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 27
FIGURE 1.17
CRIME HOTSPOTS -
PART I & II OFFENSES
9 LINE PROJECT AREA
Crime within the project area has been concentrated at 800 South and 900 West, as well as
various areas along Redwood Road.
Source: Salt Lake City Police
Department, March 2016 through
February 2017 data. Map drawn by
Kevin Bell, Salt Lake City Corporation.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 28
1(k): FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE OFFERED TO PARTICIPANTS
To promote investment in real property and consequent increases in property values, the RDA
has established programs to assist property owners and businesses within RDA project areas.
The most widely used forms of RDA assistance are loans, tax increment reimbursements, and the
property acquisition/disposition process. However, the RDA may also develop project area-specific
programs strategically targeted to promote the goals and objectives of the 9 Line Project Area. An
overview of existing programs is as follows:
1. TAX INCREMENT REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM
The RDA Tax Increment Reimbursement Program may provide project developers a
tax increment reimbursement for the development of improvements that meet the
goals and objectives of this Plan and provide significant public benefit. Tax increment
reimbursements shall be based upon the difference between the initial taxable value
of a property prior to improvements and the increased taxable value resulting from said
improvements. The developer will receive a percentage of the tax increment generated
from its project for a specified time frame, and the RDA will receive the residual tax
increment generated by the project.
2. LOAN PROGRAM
The RDA Loan Program may provide financing to facilitate various development projects,
including new construction, building rehabilitation, and energy efficiency upgrades.
Funding is made available for construction costs or hard costs. Loan funds may also
be used for site improvements associated with a development project and short-term
land acquisition for affordable housing development. Use of funds for environmental
remediation or demolition shall be considered on a case-by-case basis.
3. PROPERTY ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION
In addition to programs, the RDA may implement this Plan by acquiring property to
market for strategic redevelopment, particularly to stimulate private investment, improve
community conditions, and increase economic development with the area. As per the
Utah Community Reinvestment Agency Act, the RDA may sell, convey, grant, gift, or
otherwise dispose of any interest in real property to provide for project area development.
Disposition of all RDA-owned real property, including land write-downs, shall abide by
the RDA’s real property disposition policy, all applicable laws, and be conducted in a
competitive and transparent manner as deemed appropriate and effective.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 29
1(l): PUBLIC BENEFIT ANALYSIS SUMMARY
According to the Utah Code 17C Community Reinvestment Agency Act, the RDA shall conduct
an analysis to determine whether this CRA Plan will provide a public benefit. The RDA contracted
with Lewis Young Robertson and Burningham (“LYRB”) to carry out this effort. A summary of the
resulting analysis, as completed by LYRB, is as follows.
a. An evaluation of the reasonableness of the costs of the proposed project area development
An evaluation of the reasonableness of the costs of the proposed project area
development is based on a comparison of the costs of the development compared to
the revenues and benefits it will generate for the various taxing entities. In 2016, the
total assessed value of the Project Area was $228,048,136. In 25 years, the estimated
total assessed value is $373,461,283 considering the utilization of tax increment. This
equates to $145,413,147 in incremental assessed value. This estimate is based on the
following development assumptions over the 25-year collection period:
TABLE 1.3: DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS AND ASSESSED VALUE - 25 YEARS
Development Square
Feet/Units
$/Square
Feet
Total
Building
Value
Incremental
Land Value
Personal
Property
Value
Incremental
Assessed
Value*
Commercial 451,356 $113.11 $51,054,836 $190,551 $7,658,225 $66,389,138
Office 114,829 $141.28 $16,223,332 $101,811 $2,433,500 $21,137,709
Residential 258 units $114.15 $16,152,898 $76,416 -$18,287,596
Industrial $489,789 $62.16 $30,443,127 $132,243 $4,566,469 $39,598,704
Total $113,874,193 $501,021 $14,658,194 $145,413,147
*25-year assessed value includes a 1.0% growth rate
b. Efforts that have been, or will be made to capitalize private investment
Efforts to capitalize on private investment include the following:
• The RDA Loan Program provides gap financing that leverages private investment and
secured financing.
• The Tax Increment Reimbursement Program incentivizes private investment by
providing a reimbursement only after a project has been implemented and is
generating sufficient tax increment.
• The RDA’s disposition process leverages private investment through competitive
marketing of property for development, thereby incentivizing private equity and
financing.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 30
c. Rationale for use of project area funds (“but for” analysis)
The collective taxing entities are currently receiving approximately $3,359,833 in
property taxes annually from this Project Area. At the end of the life of the project area,
the taxing entities will receive all of their respective tax increment thereafter. At the
end of 25 years an additional $2,142,372 in property taxes annually is anticipated,
totaling approximately $5,502,205 in property taxes annually for the area. “But for”
the assistance provided by the RDA through tax increment revenues, this increase of
approximately 64 percent in property taxes generated for the taxing entities would not be
possible.
d. An estimate of total amount of funds and the length of time during which funds will be spent
Because of the high costs associated with comprehensive community revitalization,
the RDA anticipates the need for 75 percent of tax increment for a period of 25 years.
Assuming a 25-year timeframe, with 75 percent of increment flowing to the RDA, the
RDA would receive a total of approximately $26.5 million.
e. The beneficial influences on the community’s tax base
In addition to property tax revenues, development within the Project Area will also
generate sales taxes and franchise taxes. The following table shows the total revenues
anticipated to be generated by the Project Area over the 25-year timeframe.
TABLE 1.4: TOTAL REVENUES - 25 YEARS
Entity Property Tax Sales Tax Franchise
Tax
Total
Incremental
Revenues
Salt Lake County $5,700,032 $20,642,836 $26,342,868
Salt Lake City School District $14,857,106 $14,857,106
Salt Lake City $10,955,312 $8,975,146 $3,738,904 $23,669,362
Salt Lake Library $1,694,864 $1,694,864
Salt Lake Metropolitan Water $839,018 $839,018
Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement $411,095 $411,095
Central Utah Water Conservancy $961,625 $961,625
Total Revenue $35,419,052 $29,617,982 $3,738,904 $68,775,938
f. The associated business and economic activity the proposed project area development will
likely stimulate
Project area development will promote new and revitalized commercial space that will
generate business and economic activity. In addition, project area development will
promote employment centers that will support the recruitment, retention, and expansion
of businesses to build local economic and employment prosperity.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 31
g. Whether adoption of the proposed community reinvestment project area plan is necessary and
appropriate to undertake the proposed project area development
The west side of the City, particularly the Project Area, has suffered from a lack of
reinvestment over the previous decades. This has led to neglected properties, and
underutilized land uses. “But-for” the creation of the CRA, and use of public funds, the
west side of the City will continue to remain in its underutilized state. Site remediation,
small lot sizes, and aging infrastructure are a few of the obstacles that are currently
deterring development within the Project Area.
1(m): HISTORIC PRESERVATION
If any of the existing buildings or uses in the project area are included in or eligible for inclusion
in the National Register of Historic Places or the State Register, the RDA shall comply with
Section 9-8-404 as though the agency were a state agency.
1(n): INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Per the requirements listed in Utah Code 17C, the Project Area is subject to an interlocal
agreement with taxing entities, rather than a taxing entity committee, because the RDA is not
carrying out a blight study.
1(o)(i): OTHER INFORMATION -GEOGRAPHICAL FOCUS AREAS
Strategic geographic locations that are vital to the revitalization of the Project Area are as follows:
1. 400 S at 900 West: To promote a neighborhood commercial node that provides a gateway to
the Poplar Grove and Glendale neighborhoods.
2. 700 W - 800 W at 900 South: Fremont Ave: To promote economic development while
implementing land use buffers with adjacent residential uses.
3. 800 S - 900 S at 900 West: To promote neighborhood commercial nodes that provide gateways
to the neighborhood while also enhancing regional connectivity with parks and trail systems.
4. Indiana Avenue at Navajo Street: To promote a neighborhood commercial node with
connectivity to the 9 Line corridor.
5. Indiana Avenue at Redwood Road: To promote Redwood Road as a commercial corridor that is
also an important access point to the 9 Line corridor.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 32
These focus areas were determined through public outreach, an analysis of redevelopment
potential, and identification of opportunities to leverage other resources. Since the primary land
use of the Project Area is residential, redevelopment potential is greatest at neighborhood and
community nodes with zoning that supports changes in the existing land use pattern. The zoning
at these intersections will provide for economic development, increased residential densities, and
the establishment of mixed-use development.
1(o)(ii): OTHER INFORMATION -COMMUNITY OUTREACH
To develop a Plan that reflects community values and priorities, the RDA used a variety of public
engagement methods between January and August 2016 as part of the initial public outreach
process. A summary is as follows:
FIGURE 1.17: GEOGRAPHIC TARGET AREAS
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 33
OUTLETS FOR PUBLIC OUTREACH
• An open house, held at the Sorenson Unity Center on May 12, jointly hosted with the
Planning and Transportation divisions
• Community council meetings – Glendale and Poplar Grove
• School community council meetings
• Stakeholder interviews with property owners, housing, community development,
transportation, planning, local business, economic development, and governmental
stakeholders
• Community festivals, including Get into the River, Sorenson Community Fair, Groove in the
Grove, and Night Out Against Crime
• Comunidades Unidas targeted additional engagement efforts to residents and local
businesses, with focus on the Spanish-speaking population
MODES OF COLLECTING INPUT
• A community preferences questionnaire was distributed at community council meetings,
the open house, and community festivals. The RDA received responses to a total of 668
questionnaires, 353 English-language responses and 315 Spanish-language responses.
• The open house was well-attended, with 200+ stakeholders attending. Participants provided
input by filling out questionnaires and comment cards; leaving comments on neighborhood
visioning boards; and ranking project and geographic target areas on priority boards.
• RDA staff documented input received through interviews with key stakeholders.
• Stakeholders were also able to submit written comment to RDA staff via email.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
• Recreation & Open Space
1. Residents consider the area’s parks and trails as an invaluable asset that should be
promoted and celebrated.
2. Residents perceive a need for improvements to trails to mitigate the growth of
puncturevine weeds (goatheads); improve landscaping; add pedestrian-scale lighting and
other trail amenities; and improved access to the Jordan River for boaters.
3. There is a concern with safety issues along the Jordan River Parkway, particularly in areas
of the trail that are secluded and/or overgrown.
4. Residents are favorable of additional urban agriculture projects in the area.
• Transportation & Accessibility
1. Connectivity to other areas of the city is perceived by residents as limited due to the
physical barriers of I-15 and I-80. The project area’s limited east-west connections (400
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 34
S, 800 S, 900 S, and 1300 S) are considered unappealing and unsafe for pedestrians
and bicyclists.
2. Public transportation is perceived by neighborhood residents as limited in both scope
and frequency. Residents are particularly concerned with the frequency of bus service on
nights and weekends.
• Streets & Infrastructure
1. Traffic calming, improved pedestrian and bicyclist safety, and streetscape amenities are
perceived as one of the neighborhood’s greatest needs.
2. Residents are concerned about the condition of neighborhood streets, citing that several
are inadequately maintained.
• Housing
1. Many residents cite the neighborhood’s housing affordability as the reason they moved to
the neighborhood.
2. The impact of future redevelopment activities on housing affordability is a common
concern.
3. Residents value the area’s single-family neighborhoods and would like the context of
these neighborhoods preserved.
4. While some residents perceive that the Glendale and Poplar Grove neighborhoods have
too much affordable housing compared to the rest of the city, other residents would like
additional units of affordable housing.
5. Other housing needs expressed by residents include accessible (ADA) housing, accessory
dwelling units, and improvements to existing single-family housing.
• Community & Economic Development
1. Residents perceive a lack of neighborhood services, including restaurants, cafes, coffee
shops, grocery stores, and pubs/bars.
2. Residents expressed an appreciation for existing locally-owned businesses that celebrate
the neighborhood’s cultural diversity.
3. Many residents express pride in the neighborhood’s diversity of cultures, and believe this
diversity should be reflected in redevelopment activities.
4. The community would like to see more public art, with focus on pieces by local artists.
5. Residents express a need for an improved neighborhood identity.
• Geographic Targeting
Of the nine Project Area nodes identified in the Westside Master Plan, residents identified
the following top three, in order of priority:
1. 900 West at 900 South
2. 900 West at 400 South
3. Indiana Avenue at Navajo Street tied with 900 West at 800 South
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 35
2PROJECT AREA BUDGET
OVERVIEW
Section 2 of this CRA Plan conforms with the requirements of 17C-5-303, and includes the
following information:
(
1) Receipt of Tax Increment
a. Base taxable value;
b. Projected amount of tax increment to be generated within the CRA;
c. Each project area funds collection period;
d. Projected amount of tax increment to be paid to other taxing entities in accordance with
Section 17C-1-410 (if applicable);
e. If the area from which tax increment is collected is less than the entire community
reinvestment project area:
(i) a boundary description of the portion or portions of the community reinvestment
project area from which the agency receives tax increment; and
(ii) for each portion described in Subsection (1)(e)(i), the period of time during which tax
increment is collected;
f. Percentage of tax increment the agency is authorized to receive from the community
reinvestment project area; and
g. Maximum cumulative dollar amount of tax increment the agency is authorized to receive
from the community reinvestment project area.
2) Receipt of Sales and Use Tax Revenue
3) Project Area Funds to Implement this CRA Plan
4) RDA’s Combined Incremental Value
5) Amount for Administration
6) Property Owned and Expected to Sell
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 36
1(a): BASE TAXABLE VALUE
The base year is anticipated to be 2016, with a base year taxable value of $228,048,136.
1(b): PROJECTED AMOUNT OF TIF
TABLE 2.1: INCREMENTAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES GENERATED - 25 YEARS
Incremental Tax Revenues - 100%Total – 25 Years
Salt Lake County $5,700,032
Salt Lake City School District $14,857,106
Salt Lake City $10,955,312
Salt Lake Library $1,694,864
Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District $839,018
Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District $411,095
Central Utah Water Conservancy District $961,625
TOTAL $35,419,052
1(c): COLLECTION PERIOD
The collection period shall be 25 years.
1(d): TIF PAID TO OTHER TAXING ENTITIES
TABLE 2.2: INCREMENTAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES TO TAXING ENTITIES - 25 YEARS
Incremental Tax Revenues to Taxing Entities Total – 25 Years
Salt Lake County $1,425,008
Salt Lake City School District $3,714,276
Salt Lake City $2,738,828
Salt Lake Library $423,716
Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District $209,754
Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District $102,774
Central Utah Water Conservancy District $240,406
TOTAL $8,854,762
1(e): IF TIF COLLECTION AREA IS LESS THAN CRA BOUNDARY
Not applicable. The TIF collection area is the entire CRA boundary.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 37
1(f): PERCENTAGE OF TIF AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE
TABLE 2.3: REQUESTED PARTICIPATION FROM TAXING ENTITIES
Taxing Entity Percentage Length
Salt Lake County 75%25 Years
Salt Lake City School District 75%25 Years
Salt Lake City 75%25 Years
Salt Lake Library 75%25 Years
Salt Lake Metropolitan District 75%25 Years
Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement Dis.75%25 Years
Central Utah Water Conservancy District 75%25 Years
1(g): MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE AMOUNT RECEIVED BY THE RDA
Based on a conservative projection of tax increment generation, the RDA estimates receiving
approximately $26,500,000 in tax increment revenues over a 25-year period. Actual receipt
of tax increment may vary depending on absorption rates, market conditions, and taxing entity
participation. As such, tax increment budget estimates and maximums, if applicable, will be
established through an interlocal agreement with each of the participating taxing entities.
Estimated tax increment revenues are as follows:
TABLE 2.4: TAX INCREMENT REVENUES TO RDA AT 75% PARTICIPATION RATE - 25-YEARS
Incremental Tax Revenues to RDA Total – 25 Years
Salt Lake County $4,275,024
Salt Lake City School District $11,142,829
Salt Lake City $8,216,484
Salt Lake Library $1,271,148
Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District $629,263
Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District $308,321
Central Utah Water Conservancy District $721,219
TOTAL $26,564,288
2: SALES AND USE TAX REVENUE: Not applicable.
3: PROJECT AREA FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT THIS CRA PLAN
TABLE 2.5: BUDGET FOR TAX INCREMENT REVENUES TO RDA - 25-YEARS
Activity Percentage Amount
Administration & Operations 10%$2,656,429
Housing 10%$2,656,429
Redevelopment Activities 80%$21,251,430
Total 100%$26,564,288
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 38
The RDA shall implement this plan through the following activities:
• ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATIONS:
The tax increment expected to be used to cover the operating costs of administering and
implementing the CRA Plan.
• HOUSING:
The tax increment allocation required to be used for housing activities pursuant to Section
17C-2-203, 17C-3-202, or 17C-5-307 for the purposes described in Section 17C-1-412.
• REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES:
The tax increment expected to be used to carry out project development activities as further
described in this CRA Plan. Activities may include, but not be limited to, land acquisition,
public improvements, infrastructure improvements, loans, grants, and other incentives to
public and private entities.
4: RDA’S COMBINED INCREMENTAL VALUE
TABLE 2.6: RDA’s COMBINED INCREMENTAL VALUE
PROJECT AREA ASSESSED
PROPERTY VALUE
BASE TAXABLE
VALUE INCREMENTAL VALUE
SLC CBD In $2,253,069,110 $136,894,100 $2,116,175,010
SLC CBD Out $468,564,069 $0 $468,564,069
West Temple $131,625,455 $50,234,090 $81,391,365
Baseball $2,994,111 $0 $2,994,111
West Capitol Hill $83,471,701 $28,322,952 $55,148,749
Depot District $419,610,969 $27,476,425 $392,134,544
Depot District Non-Collection $17,069,143 $0 $17,069,143
Granary $90,443,298 $48,813,397 $41,629,901
North Temple Viaduct $64,730,133 $36,499,680 $28,230,453
North Temple $106,098,060 $84,073,572 $22,024,488
Block 70 $158,846,344 $58,757,937 $100,088,407
COMBINED VALUE $3,796,522,393 $471,072,153 $3,325,450,240
5: PROJECT AREA FUNDS USED FOR ADMINISTRATION
The RDA anticipates utilizing up to 10 percent of the funds captured and retained by the agency,
which is estimated to be $2,656,429.
6: EXPECTED SALE PRICE FOR PROPERTY THE RDA OWNS
The RDA does not own property within the Project Area.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 39
ATTACHMENT A: PROJECT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION & MAP
Beginning at the Southeast Corner of Block 2, City Park Subdivision as recorded in Book ‘A’ Page ‘96’ in
the Salt Lake County Recorder’s Office and running thence along the west line of Post Street N00°13’36”E
2271.76 feet more or less to the Northeast Corner of Martins Subdivision as recorded in Book ‘B’,
Page ‘54’ in the Salt Lake County Recorder’s Office; thence along the south line of 300 South Street
N89°55’54”W 426.97 feet to the Northeast Corner of Block 32, Plat C, Plat 3, Salt Lake City Survey;
thence along the west line of 1000 West Street N00°14’07”E 422.63 feet to the Northeast Corner of Lot
1, Block 1, Kelsey & Gillespie Subdivision as recorded in Book ‘B’ Page ‘76’ in the Salt Lake County
Recorder’s Office; thence along the south line of Interstate 80 the following 3 courses, 1) S89°39’57”E
237.87 feet; 2) S79°27’34”E 186.25 feet; 3) N00°19’17”E 33.39 feet; thence along the north line of
Pierpont Lofts, a Planned Unit Development as recorded in Book ‘2014P’ Page ‘85’ in the Salt Lake
County Recorder’s Office the following 6 courses, 1) S89°45’59”E 40.01 feet; 2) S77°09’00”E 122.96
feet; 3) S71°41’22”E 77.84 feet; 4) S89°45’47”E 45.99 feet; 5) S00°20’31”W 15.00 feet; 6)
S89°45’47”E 90.03 feet to the west line of 900 West Street; thence along the west line of 900 West
Street S00°13’41”W 224.04 feet to the Southeast Corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Heaths Subdivision as
recorded in Book ‘A’ Page ‘106’ in the Salt Lake County Recorder’s Office; thence N89°47’17”E 133.03
feet to the Southwest Corner of Lot 15, Block 1, Heaths Subdivision as recorded in Book ‘A’ Page ‘106’ in
the Salt Lake County Recorder’s Office; thence along the east line of 900 West N00°13’41”E 120.02 feet
to the westerly line of Interstate 15; thence along the westerly line of Interstate 15 the following 13
courses, 1) S44°46’36”E 169.72 feet; 2) S33°27’24”E 159.09 feet; 3) S12°28’25”E 253.53 feet; 4)
S02°37’50”E 270.39 feet; 5) S25°38’34”E 82.77 feet; 6) S01°24’53”E 74.30 feet; 7) S05°22’40”W
120.82 feet; 8) S04°13’28”E 794.84 feet; 9) S18°08’10”E 337.02 feet; 10) S30°34’56”E 58.65 feet;
11) S00°12’41”W 178.24 feet; 12) S89°47’19”E 109.23 feet; 13) S35°35’19”E 309.33 feet to the
Northwest Corner of Lot 27, Block 2, Kimballs Subdivision as recorded in Book ‘B’, Page ‘47’ in the Salt
Lake County Recorder’s Office; thence along the east line of 800 West Street S00°16’30”W 1451.33 feet
to the Southwest Corner of Lot 4, Block 11, Plat C, Plat 1, Salt Lake City Survey; thence along the north
line of 800 South Street S89°47’24”E 727.11 feet to the westerly line of Interstate 15; thence along said
westerly line the following 5 courses, 1) S00°13’37”W 370.09 feet; 2) S17°30’56”E 268.18 feet; 3)
S25°31’31”E 199.64 feet; 4) S50°04’03”E 192.21 feet; 5) S40°02’50”E 375.58 feet to the west line
of a railroad right of way; thence along said west line of a railroad right of way the following 8 courses, 1)
S00°22’22”W 294.30 feet; 2) N89°48’53”W 77.71 feet; 3) South 76.02 feet; 4) S36°53’15”E 8.90
feet; 5) S00°11’07”W 204.03 feet; 6) S89°48’53”E 24.75 feet; 7) S02°57’05”E 1440.68 feet; 8)
S00°13’24”W 640.83 feet to the south line of 1300 South Street; thence along said south line of 1300
South Street N89°57’21”W 624.14 feet to the Northeast Corner of Lot 1, Mellen Subdivision as recorded
in Book ‘K’, Page ‘5’ in the Salt Lake County Recorder’s Office; thence along the west line of 700 West
Street N00°11’16”E 1511.85 feet to the Southeast Corner of Parcel #15-11-428-060; thence along the
south line of said Parcel N89°48’54”W 759.24 feet to the east line of 800 West Street; thence along said
east line of 800 West Street the following 3 courses, 1) S00°13’47”W 1443.41 feet; 2) S13°54’25”E
101.39 feet; 3) S00°22’49”W 755.90 feet; thence along the south line of Parcel #15-14-204-015
S89°58’22”W 857.84 feet to the west line of 900 West Street; thence along said west line of 900 West
Street S00°13’12”W 68.73 feet to the south line of 1400 South Street; thence along said south line of
1400 South Street N89°37’51”W 563.04 feet to the east line of 1000 West Street; thence along said
east line of 1000 West Street S00°25’29”W 941.05 feet; thence along the south line of Cannon Avenue
N89°33’25”W 344.11 feet to Natura Street and a 15 foot radius curve to the left; thence along said curve
a distance of 23.57 feet (chord bears S45°26’00”W 21.22 feet); thence along the east line of Natura
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 40
Street S00°25’25”W 128.00 feet to a 15.50 foot radius curve to the left; thence along said curve a
distance of 9.18 feet (chord bears S16°32’16”E 9.05 feet) to a 55.01 foot radius reverse curve to the
right; thence along said curve a distance of 119.86 feet (chord bears S28°22’04”W 97.52 feet) to the
south line of Amiga Drive; thence along the south line of Amiga Drive the following 3 courses, 1)
N89°32’54”W 104.02 feet to a 565.82 foot radius curve to the right; 2) along said curve a distance of
128.12 feet (chord bears N83°03’41”W 127.85 feet); 3) N76°34’28”W 313.01 feet to the east line of
Parcel # 15-14-129-011; thence along said parcel the following 5 courses, 1) S15°10’59”W 187.84 feet;
2) N89°49’01”W 38.23 feet; 3) N36°49’01”W 100.02 feet; 4) N85°49’01”W 55.66 feet; 5)
N00°16’31”E 285.25 feet to the southeasterly corner of Parcel# 15-14-129-009; thence along the south
line of said Parcel N76°52’25”W 109.96 feet to the easterly line of the Jordan River; thence along the
easterly line of the Jordan River the following 26 courses, 1) N00°10’59”E 80.01 feet; 2) N52°38’59”E
72.75 feet; 3) N31°08’59”E 75.81 feet; 4) N18°36’38”E 313.12 feet; 5) N44°15’59”E 132.27 feet; 6)
N19°39’59”E 224.92 feet; 7) N09°25’13”E 224.83 feet; 8) N58°27’35”W 246.37 feet to a 75.87 foot
radius non-tangent curve to the right; 9) along said curve a distance of 108.87 feet (chord bears
N14°07’03”W 99.77 feet); 10) N29°32’29”E 102.42 feet; 11) N44°27’55”E 311.81 feet; 12)
N70°05’49”E 550.86 feet to a 613.06 foot radius non-tangent curve to the right; 13) along said curve a
distance of 378.12 feet (chord bears S83°52’45”E 372.15 feet); 14) S71°52’35”E 147.32 feet; 15)
N79°27’08”E 80.70 feet; 16) N49°00’17”E 117.74 feet; 17) N30°23’45”W 407.44 feet to a 463.30
foot radius non-tangent curve to the right; 18) along said curve a distance of 398.63 feet (chord bears
N07°45’24”E 386.44 feet); 19) N28°07’15”E 64.20 feet to a 163.36 foot radius non-tangent curve to
the left; 20) along said curve a distance of 204.20 feet (chord bears N34°19’35”W 191.16 feet); 21)
S86°02’26”W 110.85 feet; 22) S71°12’47”W 156.82 feet; 23) N87°58’19”W 479.74 feet to a 40.18
foot radius non-tangent curve to the right; 24) along said curve a distance of 90.53 feet (chord bears
N32°01’12”W 72.56 feet); 25) N27°24’51”E 330.45 feet; 26) N01°40’25”E 140.26 feet to the south
line of Parcel # 15-11-332-005; thence along said Parcel the following 2 courses, 1) S89°55’56”W
121.82 feet; 2) N00°05’13”W 125.02 feet to the Northwest Corner of Parcel # 15-11-332-004; thence
along north line of said parcel N89°57’56”E 43.10 feet to the westerly line of the Jordan River; thence
along said westerly line the following 4 courses, 1) N06°03’26”W 135.10 feet; 2) N54°00’08”W 349.65
feet to a 334.84 foot radius non-tangent curve to the right; 3) along said curve a distance of 309.49 feet
(chord bears N21°55’40”W 298.59 feet); 4) N14°59’01”E 93.42 feet to the south line of Mead Avenue;
thence along the south line of Mead Avenue the following 3 courses, 1) N89°50’12”W 605.98 feet;
2) N73°39’47”W 52.06; 3) N89°50’08”W 1320.74 feet to the west line of Navajo Street; thence along
the west line of Navajo Street N00°14’33”E 193.47 feet to the south line of American Avenue; thence
along the south line of American Avenue N89°53’09”W 1123.63 feet to the west line of 1500 West
Street; thence along the west line of 1500 West Street N00°10’33”E 422.15 feet to a 5694.74 foot
radius non-tangent curve to the right; thence along said curve a distance of 741.34 feet (chord bears
N85°13’34”W 740.81 feet) to the Northeast Corner of Parcel # 15-10-257-002; thence along the east
line of said parcel S02°41’30”W 269.54 feet; thence along the east line of Parcel #15-10-257-003 the
following 2 courses, 1) S02°47’47”W 357.83 feet; 2) S04°41’07”W 99.87 feet; thence along the east
line of Parcel# 15-10-401-005 the following 2 courses, 1) S04°41’07”W 212.54 feet; 2) S01°39’57”W
38.42 feet; thence along the east line of Parcel # 15-10-401-001 S00°19’05”W 50.01 feet; thence
along Parcel# 15-10-403-015 the following 2 courses, 1) S02°41’02”W 185.19 feet; 2) N89°40’55”W
539.32 feet; thence S00°19’05”W 100.02 feet; thence N89°40’55”W 103.49 feet to the east line of
Redwood Road; thence along said east line S00°11’44”W 1839.47 feet to the north line of California
Avenue; thence N80°56’50”W 130.02 feet to the intersection of the north line of California Avenue and
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 41
the easterly line of the Surplus Canal; thence along the easterly line of the Surplus Canal the following 4
courses, 1) N00°11’44”E 96.08 feet to a 1413.20 foot radius non-tangent curve to the left; 2) along said
curve a distance of 436.53 feet (chord bears N37°09’04”W 434.79 feet); 3) N54°18’09”W 1585.32
feet; 4) N48°29’41”W 1224.01 feet to the east line of Interstate 215; thence along the east line of
Interstate 215 the following 3 courses, 1) N03°07’41”E 1899.46 feet to a 2900.49 foot radius non-
tangent curve to the left; 2) along said curve a distance of 1100.30 feet (chord bears N06°44’53”W
1093.71 feet); 3) N17°30’38”W 1340.78 feet to the north line of 500 South Street; thence along the
north line of 500 South Street the following 4 courses, 1) S89°47’55”E 942.07 feet; 2) S88°28’53”E
1008.30 feet; 3) S89°38’53”E 995.09 feet; 4) N85°59’19”E 110.31 feet to the east line of Redwood
Road; thence along the east line of Redwood Road the following 4 courses, 1) S00°11’34”W 66.01 feet;
2) S02°15’07”W 279.22 feet; 3) S00°11’57”W 1722.34 feet; 4) S01°12’51”E 181.66 feet to the north
line of 800 South Street; thence along the north line of 800 South Street S89°53’36”E 3543.84 feet to
the west line of 1200 West Street; thence along the west line of 1200 West Street N00°08’29”E 664.99
feet to the north line of 700 South Street; thence along the north line of 700 South Street S89°52’17”E
394.03 feet to the east line of Emery Street; thence along the east line of Emery Street S00°11’25”W
675.21 feet to the north line of 800 South Street; thence along the north line of 800 South Street
S89°47’06”E 656.67 feet; thence S00°06’58”W 66.01 feet to the north line of Parcel # 15-11-131-
011; thence along said Parcel the following 2 courses, 1) along a 136.65 foot radius curve to the right a
distance of 172.68 feet (chord bears S53°41’07”E 161.42 feet; 2) S17°29’06”E 154.04 feet to the
north line of Indiana Avenue; thence along the north line of Indiana Avenue N72°44’46”E 168.58 feet to
the west line of Goshen Street; thence along the west line of Goshen Street N00°11’41”E 964.75 feet to
the north line of 700 South Street; thence along the north line of 700 South Street S89°46’29”E 358.03
feet to the west line of 1000 West Street; thence along the west line of 1000 West Street N00°04’35”E
766.35 feet to the north line of 600 South Street; thence along the north line of 600 South Street
S89°50’19”E 377.34 feet to the point of beginning.
Contains 945.46 Acres, more or less.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 42
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA PLAN 43
ATTACHMENT B: DEFINITIONS
1. The term “Act” or “Utah Code 17C Community Reinvestment Agency Act” shall mean the “Limited
Purpose Local Government Entities - Community Reinvestment Agency Act” as found in Title 17C,
Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended.
2. The term “Affordable Housing” shall mean housing to be owned or occupied by persons and families
of low or moderate income, as determined by resolution of the RDA.
3. The term “Base Taxable Value” unless otherwise adjusted in accordance with provisions of this title,
shall mean a property’s taxable value as shown upon the assessment roll last equalized during the base
year.
4. The term “Base Year” shall mean, except as provided in Subsection 17C-1-402(4)(c), the year during
which the assessment roll is last equalized
5. The term “Board” shall mean the governing body of the Agency, as provided in Section 17C-1-203 of
the Act.
6. The term “City” shall mean the city of Salt Lake City.
7. The term “Housing Allocation” shall mean tax increment allocated for housing under Section 17C-2-
203, 17C-3-202, or 17C-5-307 for the purposes described in Section 17C-1-412.
8. The term “Income Targeted Housing” shall mean housing to be owned or occupied by a family whose
annual income is at or below 80% of the median annual income for Salt Lake County.
9. The term “Northwest Quadrant Master Plan” shall mean the Community General Plan as required by
the Act, which acts as the master plan, adopted by Salt Lake City on August 16, 2016.
10. The term “Project Area” shall mean the area described in Exhibit A attached hereto.
11. The term “Project Area Budget” shall mean a multiyear projection of annual or cumulative revenues
and expenses and other fiscal matters pertaining to the Project Area that includes:
(i) the Base Taxable Value of property in the Project Area;
(ii) the projected Tax Increment expected to be generated within the Project Area;
(iii) the amount of Tax Increment expected to be shared with other taxing entities;
(iv) the amount of Tax Increment expected to be used to implement the Project Area Plan, including
the estimated amount of Tax Increment to be used for land acquisition, public improvements,
infrastructure improvements, and loans, grants, or other incentives to private and public entities;
(v) the Tax Increment expected to be used to cover the cost of administering the Project Area Plan;
(vi) if the area from which Tax Increment is to be collected is less than the entire Project Area:
(a) the tax identification numbers of the parcels from which Tax Increment will be collected; or
(b) a legal description of the portion of the Project Area from which Tax Increment will be
collected;
(vii) for property that the RDA owns and expects to sell, the expected total cost of
the property to the RDA and the expected selling price; and
(viii) the following required information:
(a) the number of tax years for which the RDA will be allowed to receive Tax Increment from
the Project Area; and
(b) the percentage of Tax Increment or maximum cumulative dollar amount of Tax Increment
the RDA is entitled to receive from the Project Area under the Project Area Budget.
12. The term “RDA” shall mean the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City.
13. The term “Taxable Value” shall mean the value of property as shown on the last equalized assessment
roll as certified by the Salt Lake County Assessor.
14. The term “Tax Increment” shall mean the difference between:
(i) the amount of property tax revenues generated each tax year by all taxing entities from the area
within a Project Area designated in the Project Area Plan as the area from which Tax Increment is to
be collected, using the current assessed value of the property; and
(ii) the amount of property tax revenues that would be generated from that same area using the Base
Taxable Value of the property.
15. The term “Taxing Entity” shall mean a public entity that levies a tax on a parcel or parcels of property
located within the City.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
PUBLIC BENEFITS ANALYSIS &
PROJECT AREA BUDGET
9 LINE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AREA (CRA)
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
MARCH 2018
ATTACHMENT C: PROJECT AREA BENEFITS ANALYSIS AND BUDGET
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
Page | 2
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................................... 2
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 3
SECTION 2: DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA ................................................. 3
SECTION 3: GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROJECT AREA BUDGET ....................................................................... 4
SECTION 4: PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT .......................................................................................................... 5
SECTION 5: COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................... 7
EXHIBIT A: PROJECT AREA MAP ......................................................................................................................... 8
EXHIBIT B: MULTI-YEAR BUDGET .................................................................................................................. 10
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
Page | 3
Section 1: Introduction
The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (the “Agency”), following thorough consideration of the
needs and desires of the City of Salt Lake (the “City”) and its residents, as well as understanding the City’s
capacity for new development, has carefully crafted the Project Area Plan (the “Plan”) for the 9 Line
Community Reinvestment Project Area (the “Project Area”). The Plan is the end result of a
comprehensive evaluation of the types of appropriate land-uses and economic development opportunities
for the land encompassed by the Project Area which lies west of I-15, east of I-215, between 300 South
and Amiga Drive.
The Plan is envisioned to define the method and means of development for the Project Area from its
current state to a higher and better use. The City has determined it is in the best interest of its citizens
to assist in the development of the Project Area. This Project Area Budget document (the “Budget”)
is predicated upon certain elements, objectives and conditions outlined in the Plan and intended to be
used as a financing tool to assist the Agency in meeting Plan objectives discussed herein and more
specifically referenced and identified in the Plan.
The creation of the Project Area is being undertaken as a community reinvestment project pursuant to
certain provisions of Chapters 1 and 5 of the Utah Community Reinvestment Agency Act (the “Act”, Utah
Code Annotated (“UCA”) Title 17C). The requirements of the Act, including notice and hearing
obligations, have been observed at all times throughout the establishment of the Project Area.
Section 2: Description of Community Development Project
Area
The Project Area lies west of I-15, east of I-215, between 300 South and Amiga Drive, and is located
within the City’s western boundaries. This area in particular serves as the primary destination in the City
for river recreation and active parks. The property encompasses approximately 738 acres of land.
A map of the Project Area are attached hereto in EXHIBIT A.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
Page | 4
Section 3: General Overview of Project Area Budget
The purpose of the Project Area Budget is to provide the financial framework necessary to implement
the Project Area Plan vision and objectives. The Project Area Plan has identified that tax increment
financing is essential in order to meet the objectives of the CRA Project Area. The following information
will detail the sources and uses of tax increment and other necessary details needed for public officials,
interested parties, and the public in general to understand the mechanics of the Project Area Budget.
Base Year Value
The Agency has determined that the base year property tax value for the Project Area will be the total
taxable value for the 2016 tax year which is estimated to be $228,048,136. Using the tax rates established
within the Project Area the property taxes levied equate to $3,359,833 annually. Accordingly, this amount
will continue to flow through to each taxing entity proportional to the amount of their respective tax
rates being levied.
Payment Trigger
This Budget will have a twenty-five year (25) duration from the date of the first tax increment received
by the Agency. The collection of tax increment will be triggered at the discretion of the Agency prior to
March 1 of the tax year in which they intend to begin the collection of increment. The following year in
which this increment will be remitted to the Agency will be Year 1, e.g., if requested prior to March 1,
2018, Year 1 of increment will be 2019. The Agency anticipates it will trigger the tax increment by March
1, 2020 but in no case will the Agency trigger the first tax increment collection after March 1, 2022.
Projected Tax Increment Revenue – Total Generation
Development within the Project Area will commence upon favorable market conditions which will include
both horizontal and vertical infrastructure and development. The Agency anticipates that new
development will begin in the Project Area in 2018. The contemplated development will generate
significant additional property tax revenue as well as incremental sales and use tax above what is currently
generated within the Project Area.
Property Tax Increment will begin to be generated in the tax year (ending Dec 1st) following construction
completion and Tax Increment will actually be paid to the Agency in March or April after collection. It is
projected that property Tax Increment generation within the Project Area could begin as early as 2020
or as late as 2022. It is currently estimated that during the 25-year life of the Project Area Budget,
property Tax Increment could be generated within the Project Area in the approximate amount of $35.42
million or at a net present value (NPV)1 of $19.06 million. This amount is over and above the $83.99
million of base taxes that the property would generate over 25 years at the $3,359,833 annual amount it
currently generates as shown in Table 4.1 below.
1 Net Present Value of future cash flows assumes a 4% discount rate. The same 4% discount rate is used in all
remaining NPV calculations. This total is prior to accounting for the flow-through of tax increment to the
respective taxing entities.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
Page | 5
Section 4: Property Tax Increment
Base Year Property Tax Revenue
The taxing entities are currently receiving - and will continue to receive - property tax revenue from the
current assessed value of the property within the Project Area (“Base Taxes”). The current assessed
value is estimated to be $228,048,136. Based upon the tax rates in the area, the collective taxing entities
are receiving $3,359,833 in property tax annually from this Project Area. This equates to approximately
$83,995,830 over the 25-year life of the Project Area.
Site and building demolition will need to occur in order to facilitate the envisioned development as outlined
in the Plan. This demolition will initially lower the assessed value of the Project Area to a level below the
base year value, however it is anticipated that the assessed value within the Project Area will be above the
$228,048,136 base year value by year 1 of the Project Area life.
T ABLE 4.1: T OTAL B ASE YEAR TO T AXING ENTITIES (OVER 25 Y EARS)
Entity Total NPV at 4%
Salt Lake County $13,517,553 $8,446,892
Salt Lake City School District 35,233,437 22,016,783
Salt Lake City 25,980,384 16,234,705
Salt Lake Library 4,019,348 2,511,623
Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District 1,989,720 1,243,343
Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District 974,906 609,202
Central Utah Water Conservancy District 2,280,481 1,425,034
Total Revenue $83,995,830 $52,487,583
Property Tax Increment Shared with RDA (75% Participation Rate for 25 Years)
All taxing entities that receive property tax generated within the Project Area, as detailed above, will share
at least a portion of that increment generation with the Agency. All taxing entities will contribute 75% of
their respective tax increment for 25 years. The County and the State will not contribute any portion of
their incremental sales tax to implement the Project Area Plan. Table 4.2 shows the amount of Tax
Increment shared with the Agency assuming the participation levels discussed above.
T ABLE 4.2: SOURCES OF T AX INCREMENT FUNDS
Entity Percentage Length Total NPV at 4%
Salt Lake County 75% 25 Years $4,275,024 $2,300,249
Salt Lake City School District 75% 25 Years 11,142,829 5,995,587
Salt Lake City 75% 25 Years 8,216,484 4,421,018
Salt Lake Library 75% 25 Years 1,271,148 683,963
Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District 75% 25 Years 629,263 338,586
Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District 75% 25 Years 308,321 165,897
Central Utah Water Conservancy District 75% 25 Years 721,219 388,064
Total Sources of Tax Increment Funds $26,564,289 $14,293,364
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
Page | 6
Uses of Tax Increment
The west side of the City, particularly the Project Area, has suffered from a lack of reinvestment over the
previous decades. This has led to blighted properties, and underutilized land uses. “But -for” the creation
of the CRA, and use of public funds, the west side of the City will continue to remain in its underutilized
state. Site remediation, small lot sizes, and aging infrastructure are a few of the obstacles that are currently
deterring development within the Project Area.
The majority of the Tax Increment collected by the Agency (80%) will be used to overcome these
obstacles. Including: offsetting certain on-site public infrastructure costs, land assemblage, relocation of
current businesses and land uses, Agency requested improvements and upgrades, desirable Project Area
improvements, and other redevelopment activities as approved by the Agency. 10% will go towards
affordable housing, as outlined the Act. The remaining 10% will be used to offset the administration and
operation costs of the Agency.
T ABLE 4.3: USES OF T AX INCREMENT
Uses Total NPV at 4%
Redevelopment Activities @ 80% $21,251,431 $11,434,691
CRA Housing Requirement @ 10% 2,656,429 1,429,336
Project Area Administration @ 10% 2,656,429 1,429,336
Total Uses of Tax Increment Funds $26,564,289 $14,293,364
A multi-year projection of tax increment is included in EXHIBIT B.
Total Annual Property Tax Revenue for Taxing Entities at Conclusion of Project
As described above, the collective taxing entities are currently receiving approximately $3,359,833 in
property taxes annually from this Project Area. At the end of 25 years an additional $2,142,372 in
property taxes annually is anticipated, totaling approximately $5,502,205 in property taxes annually for
the area. “But for” the assistance provided by the RDA through tax increment revenues, this increase of
approximately 64 percent in property taxes generated for the taxing entities would not be possible.
T ABLE 4.4: T OTAL B ASE YEAR AND END OF PROJECT LIFE ANNUAL PROPERTY TAXES
Entity
Annual Base
Year Property
Taxes
Annual Property
Tax Increment at
Conclusion of
Project
Total Annual
Property Taxes
Salt Lake County $540,702 $344,775 $885,477
Salt Lake City School District 1,409,337 898,653 2,307,991
Salt Lake City 1,039,215 662,648 1,701,863
Salt Lake Library 160,774 102,516 263,290
Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District 79,589 50,749 130,338
Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District 38,996 24,866 63,862
Central Utah Water Conservancy District 91,219 58,165 149,385
Total Revenue $3,359,833 $2,142,372 $5,502,205
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
Page | 7
Section 5: Cost/Benefit Analysis
Additional Revenues
Other Tax Revenues
The development within the Project Area will also generate sales taxes, energy sales and use taxes for
natural gas and electric.
Table 5.1 shows the total revenues generated by the Project Area. This total includes the anticipated
property tax increment, sales tax, and energy sales and use tax.
T ABLE 5.1 T OTAL REVENUES
Entity Property
Tax Sales Tax Franchise
Tax
Total
Incremental
Revenues
Salt Lake County $5,700,032 $20,642,836 - $26,342,868
Salt Lake City School District 14,857,106 - - 14,857,106
Salt Lake City 10,955,312 8,975,146 3,738,904 23,669,362
Salt Lake Library 1,694,864 - - 1,694,864
Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District 839,018 - - 839,018
Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District 411,095 - - 411,095
Central Utah Water Conservancy District 961,625 - - 961,625
Total Revenue $35,419,052 $29,617,982 $3,738,904 $68,775,938
Additional Costs
The development anticipated within the Project Area will also likely result in additional general
government, public works, and public safety costs. These costs, along with the estimated budget to
implement the Project Area Plan, are identified below.
T ABLE 5.2 T OTAL EXPENDITURES
Entity CRA Budget General
Government
Public
Works
Public
Safety
Total
Incremental
Expenditures
Salt Lake County $4,275,024 $231,049 - - $4,506,073
Salt Lake City School District 11,142,829 2,771,952 - - 13,914,781
Salt Lake City 8,216,484 228,121 2,172,913 3,779,395 14,396,913
Salt Lake Library 1,271,148 - - - 1,271,148
Salt Lake Metropolitan Water
District 629,263 68,095 - - 697,358
Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement
District 308,321 7,535 - - 315,856
Central Utah Water Conservancy
District 721,219 17,251 - - 738,470
Total Expenditures $26,564,288 $3,324,003 $2,172,913 $3,779,395 $35,840,599
The total net benefit to the taxing entities of participating in the Project Area is $32,935,339, with the
City’s net benefit being $9,696,165.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
Page | 8
T ABLE 5.3: T OTAL CITY REVENUES Total NPV at 4%
Property Tax Increment $12,650,176 $6,806,641
Sales Tax 8,975,146 4,869,701
Telecom Tax 828,526 443,709
Energy Sales & Use Tax (Natural Gas) 522,461 274,543
Energy Sales & Use Tax (Electricity) 2,387,917 1,254,804
Total City Revenue $25,364,227 $13,649,397
T ABLE 5.4: T OTAL CITY EXPENDITURES
Total NPV at 4%
CRA Budget $9,487,632 $5,104,981
General Government 228,121 119,902
Public Works 2,172,913 1,142,093
Public Safety 3,779,395 1,985,693
Total City Expenditures $15,668,062 $8,352,668
Total City Benefit $9,696,165 $5,296,729
*Note: Total City Benefit includes Salt Lake City and Salt Lake Library.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
Page | 9
Exhibit A: Project Area Map
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
Page | 10
Exhibit B: Multi-Year Budget
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake CityASSUMPTIONS:9 Line Project AreaDiscount Rate4.0%Increment and Budget AnalysisGrowth Rate 1.0%Payment Year2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045Tax Year2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044TOTALS NPVCumulative Taxable ValueYearYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25Tax District 13Commercial$1,812,374 $4,177,890 $7,130,537 $11,274,440 $15,384,354 $20,098,393 $24,795,438 $29,492,483 $34,189,528 $38,886,572 $44,791,867 $51,871,422 $58,916,989 $59,506,159 $60,101,221 $60,702,233 $61,309,255 $61,922,348 $62,541,571 $63,166,987 $63,798,657 $64,436,643 $65,081,010 $65,731,820 $66,389,138Office$585,158 $1,339,915 $2,281,241 $3,604,188 $4,910,166 $6,411,197 $7,903,744 $9,396,290 $10,888,837 $12,381,383 $14,264,035 $16,519,823 $18,758,643 $18,946,230 $19,135,692 $19,327,049 $19,520,319 $19,715,522 $19,912,678 $20,111,804 $20,312,922 $20,516,052 $20,721,212 $20,928,424 $21,137,709Residential$503,691 $1,156,175 $1,970,188 $3,113,626 $4,244,329 $5,542,929 $6,835,161 $8,127,393 $9,419,624 $10,711,856 $12,339,882 $14,290,966 $16,229,313 $16,391,606 $16,555,522 $16,721,078 $16,888,288 $17,057,171 $17,227,743 $17,400,020 $17,574,021 $17,749,761 $17,927,258 $18,106,531 $18,287,596Industrial$1,083,349 $2,494,753 $4,256,253 $6,728,965 $9,179,637 $11,991,425 $14,792,192 $17,592,960 $20,393,728 $23,194,495 $26,717,495 $30,940,687 $35,141,839 $35,493,257 $35,848,190 $36,206,672 $36,568,739 $36,934,426 $37,303,770 $37,676,808 $38,053,576 $38,434,112 $38,818,453 $39,206,637 $39,598,704 Total Assessed Value:$3,984,571 $9,168,733 $15,638,219 $24,721,219 $33,718,486 $44,043,943 $54,326,534 $64,609,125 $74,891,716 $85,174,307 $98,113,279 $113,622,898 $129,046,784 $130,337,252 $131,640,625 $132,957,031 $134,286,601 $135,629,467 $136,985,762 $138,355,620 $139,739,176 $141,136,568 $142,547,933 $143,973,413 $145,413,147Value of Current Property$228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136 $228,048,136Less Base Year Value(228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ (228,048,136)$ $3,984,571 $9,168,733 $15,638,219 $24,721,219 $33,718,486 $44,043,943 $54,326,534 $64,609,125 $74,891,716 $85,174,307 $98,113,279 $113,622,898 $129,046,784 $130,337,252 $131,640,625 $132,957,031 $134,286,601 $135,629,467 $136,985,762 $138,355,620 $139,739,176 $141,136,568 $142,547,933 $143,973,413 $145,413,147TAX RATE & INCREMENT ANALYSIS:2016 RatesSalt Lake County0.002371 9,447 21,739 37,078 58,614 79,947 104,428 128,808 153,188 177,568 201,948 232,627 269,400 305,970 309,030 312,120 315,241 318,394 321,577 324,793 328,041 331,322 334,635 337,981 341,361 344,775 5,700,032 3,066,998 Salt Lake City School District0.006180 24,625 56,663 96,644 152,777 208,380 272,192 335,738 399,284 462,831 526,377 606,340 702,190 797,509 805,484 813,539 821,674 829,891 838,190 846,572 855,038 863,588 872,224 880,946 889,756 898,653 14,857,106 7,994,116 Salt Lake City0.004557 18,158 41,782 71,263 112,655 153,655 200,708 247,566 294,424 341,282 388,139 447,102 517,780 588,066 593,947 599,886 605,885 611,944 618,063 624,244 630,487 636,791 643,159 649,591 656,087 662,648 10,955,312 5,894,691 Salt Lake Library0.000705 2,809 6,464 11,025 17,428 23,772 31,051 38,300 45,549 52,799 60,048 69,170 80,104 90,978 91,888 92,807 93,735 94,672 95,619 96,575 97,541 98,516 99,501 100,496 101,501 102,516 1,694,864 911,950 Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District0.000349 1,391 3,200 5,458 8,628 11,768 15,371 18,960 22,549 26,137 29,726 34,242 39,654 45,037 45,488 45,943 46,402 46,866 47,335 47,808 48,286 48,769 49,257 49,749 50,247 50,749 839,018 451,448 Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District0.000171 681 1,568 2,674 4,227 5,766 7,532 9,290 11,048 12,806 14,565 16,777 19,430 22,067 22,288 22,511 22,736 22,963 23,193 23,425 23,659 23,895 24,134 24,376 24,619 24,866 411,095 221,196 Central Utah Water Conservancy District0.000400 1,594 3,667 6,255 9,888 13,487 17,618 21,731 25,844 29,957 34,070 39,245 45,449 51,619 52,135 52,656 53,183 53,715 54,252 54,794 55,342 55,896 56,455 57,019 57,589 58,165 961,625 517,419 Totals:0.014733 58,705 135,083 230,398 364,218 496,774 648,899 800,393 951,886 1,103,380 1,254,873 1,445,503 1,674,006 1,901,246 1,920,259 1,939,461 1,958,856 1,978,444 1,998,229 2,018,211 2,038,393 2,058,777 2,079,365 2,100,159 2,121,160 2,142,372 35,419,052 19,057,818 TOTAL INCREMENTAL REVENUE IN PROJECT AREA:$58,705 $135,083 $230,398 $364,218 $496,774 $648,899 $800,393 $951,886 $1,103,380 $1,254,873 $1,445,503 $1,674,006 $1,901,246 $1,920,259 $1,939,461 $1,958,856 $1,978,444 $1,998,229 $2,018,211 $2,038,393 $2,058,777 $2,079,365 $2,100,159 $2,121,160 $2,142,372$35,419,052 $19,057,818PROJECT AREA BUDGET2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045Sources of Funds:2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044TOTALS NPVProperty Tax Participation Rate for BudgetSalt Lake County75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%Salt Lake City School District75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%Salt Lake City75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%Salt Lake Library75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%Central Utah Water Conservancy District75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%Property Tax Increment for BudgetSalt Lake County$7,086 $16,304 $27,809 $43,961 $59,960 $78,321 $96,606 $114,891 $133,176 $151,461 $174,470 $202,050 $229,477 $231,772 $234,090 $236,431 $238,795 $241,183 $243,595 $246,031 $248,491 $250,976 $253,486 $256,021 $258,581$4,275,024 $2,300,249Salt Lake City School District$18,468 $42,497 $72,483 $114,583 $156,285 $204,144 $251,803 $299,463 $347,123 $394,783 $454,755 $526,642 $598,132 $604,113 $610,154 $616,256 $622,418 $628,643 $634,929 $641,278 $647,691 $654,168 $660,710 $667,317 $673,990$11,142,829 $5,995,587Salt Lake City$13,618 $31,336 $53,448 $84,491 $115,241 $150,531 $185,675 $220,818 $255,961 $291,104 $335,327 $388,335 $441,050 $445,460 $449,915 $454,414 $458,958 $463,548 $468,183 $472,865 $477,594 $482,370 $487,193 $492,065 $496,986$8,216,484 $4,421,018Salt Lake Library$2,107 $4,848 $8,269 $13,071 $17,829 $23,288 $28,725 $34,162 $39,599 $45,036 $51,877 $60,078 $68,233 $68,916 $69,605 $70,301 $71,004 $71,714 $72,431 $73,156 $73,887 $74,626 $75,372 $76,126 $76,887$1,271,148 $683,963Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District$1,043 $2,400 $4,093 $6,471 $8,826 $11,529 $14,220 $16,911 $19,603 $22,294 $25,681 $29,741 $33,778 $34,116 $34,457 $34,802 $35,150 $35,501 $35,856 $36,215 $36,577 $36,942 $37,312 $37,685 $38,062$629,263 $338,586Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District$511 $1,176 $2,006 $3,170 $4,324 $5,649 $6,967 $8,286 $9,605 $10,924 $12,583 $14,572 $16,550 $16,716 $16,883 $17,052 $17,222 $17,394 $17,568 $17,744 $17,922 $18,101 $18,282 $18,465 $18,649$308,321 $165,897Central Utah Water Conservancy District$1,195 $2,751 $4,691 $7,416 $10,116 $13,213 $16,298 $19,383 $22,468 $25,552 $29,434 $34,087 $38,714 $39,101 $39,492 $39,887 $40,286 $40,689 $41,096 $41,507 $41,922 $42,341 $42,764 $43,192 $43,624$721,219 $388,064Total Property Tax Increment for Budget:$44,029 $101,312 $172,798 $273,163 $372,581 $486,675 $600,295 $713,915 $827,535 $941,155 $1,084,127 $1,255,505 $1,425,935 $1,440,194 $1,454,596 $1,469,142 $1,483,833 $1,498,672 $1,513,658 $1,528,795 $1,544,083 $1,559,524 $1,575,119 $1,590,870 $1,606,779 $26,564,289 $14,293,364Uses of Tax Increment Funds:2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045TOTALS NPVRedevelopment Activities (Infrastructure, Relocation, Incentives, etc.)80.0%$35,223 $81,050 $138,239 $218,531 $298,065 $389,340 $480,236 $571,132 $662,028 $752,924 $867,302 $1,004,404 $1,140,748 $1,152,155 $1,163,677 $1,175,314 $1,187,067 $1,198,937 $1,210,927 $1,223,036 $1,235,266 $1,247,619 $1,260,095 $1,272,696 $1,285,423$21,251,431 $11,434,691CRA Housing10.0%$4,403 $10,131 $17,280 $27,316 $37,258 $48,667 $60,029 $71,391 $82,753 $94,115 $108,413 $125,550 $142,593 $144,019 $145,460 $146,914 $148,383 $149,867 $151,366 $152,880 $154,408 $155,952 $157,512 $159,087 $160,678$2,656,429 $1,429,336RDA Administration and Operations10.0%$4,403 $10,131 $17,280 $27,316 $37,258 $48,667 $60,029 $71,391 $82,753 $94,115 $108,413 $125,550 $142,593 $144,019 $145,460 $146,914 $148,383 $149,867 $151,366 $152,880 $154,408 $155,952 $157,512 $159,087 $160,678$2,656,429 $1,429,336Total Uses$44,029 $101,312 $172,798 $273,163 $372,581 $486,675 $600,295 $713,915 $827,535 $941,155 $1,084,127 $1,255,505 $1,425,935 $1,440,194 $1,454,596 $1,469,142 $1,483,833 $1,498,672 $1,513,658 $1,528,795 $1,544,083 $1,559,524 $1,575,119 $1,590,870 $1,606,779$26,564,289 $14,293,364REMAINING TAX REVENUES FOR TAXING ENTITIES2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045TOTALS NPVSalt Lake County$2,362 $5,435 $9,270 $14,654 $19,987 $26,107 $32,202 $38,297 $44,392 $50,487 $58,157 $67,350 $76,492 $77,257 $78,030 $78,810 $79,598 $80,394 $81,198 $82,010 $82,830 $83,659 $84,495 $85,340 $86,194$1,425,008 $766,750Salt Lake City School District$6,156 $14,166 $24,161 $38,194 $52,095 $68,048 $83,934 $99,821 $115,708 $131,594 $151,585 $175,547 $199,377 $201,371 $203,385 $205,419 $207,473 $209,548 $211,643 $213,759 $215,897 $218,056 $220,237 $222,439 $224,663$3,714,276 $1,998,529Salt Lake City$4,539 $10,445 $17,816 $28,164 $38,414 $50,177 $61,892 $73,606 $85,320 $97,035 $111,776 $129,445 $147,017 $148,487 $149,972 $151,471 $152,986 $154,516 $156,061 $157,622 $159,198 $160,790 $162,398 $164,022 $165,662$2,738,828 $1,473,673Salt Lake Library$702 $1,616 $2,756 $4,357 $5,943 $7,763 $9,575 $11,387 $13,200 $15,012 $17,292 $20,026 $22,744 $22,972 $23,202 $23,434 $23,668 $23,905 $24,144 $24,385 $24,629 $24,875 $25,124 $25,375 $25,629$423,716 $227,988Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District$348 $800 $1,364 $2,157 $2,942 $3,843 $4,740 $5,637 $6,534 $7,431 $8,560 $9,914 $11,259 $11,372 $11,486 $11,601 $11,717 $11,834 $11,952 $12,072 $12,192 $12,314 $12,437 $12,562 $12,687$209,754 $112,862Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District$170 $392 $669 $1,057 $1,441 $1,883 $2,322 $2,762 $3,202 $3,641 $4,194 $4,857 $5,517 $5,572 $5,628 $5,684 $5,741 $5,798 $5,856 $5,915 $5,974 $6,034 $6,094 $6,155 $6,216$102,774 $55,299Central Utah Water Conservancy District$398 $917 $1,564 $2,472 $3,372 $4,404 $5,433 $6,461 $7,489 $8,517 $9,811 $11,362 $12,905 $13,034 $13,164 $13,296 $13,429 $13,563 $13,699 $13,836 $13,974 $14,114 $14,255 $14,397 $14,541$240,406 $129,355Total$14,676 $33,771 $57,599 $91,054 $124,194 $162,225 $200,098 $237,972 $275,845 $313,718 $361,376 $418,502 $475,312 $480,065 $484,865 $489,714 $494,611 $499,557 $504,553 $509,598 $514,694 $519,841 $525,040 $530,290 $535,593$8,854,763 $4,764,455TOTAL INCREMENTAL VALUE:INCREMENTAL TAX ANALYSIS: TaxInc Budget9 Line CRA Analysis (City Copy) 3.1.18.xlsxDocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
5
EXHIBIT B
Board of Education of Salt Lake City School District’s Portion of Tax Increment from the
9 Line Community Reinvestment Area
The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (“RDA”) shall be entitled to retain seventy-five
percent (75%) of Salt Lake City School District’s portion of the Tax Increment from the 9 Line
Community Reinvestment Area (the “Project Area”) for twenty (20) years beginning with the
2021 tax year. The calculation of annual Tax Increment shall be made using (a) Salt Lake
County’s then current tax levy rate for the District, and (b) the 2016 base year taxable value of
$228,048,136, which taxable value is subject to adjustment as required by law.
Tax increment (“TI”) shall be utilized to implement the 9 Line Community Reinvestment Area
Plan (the “Project Area Plan”) as follows:
I. BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
Budget allocations from the 75% of TI collected from the District shall be as follows:
Activity Percentage
1. Redevelopment Activities 80%
2. Housing 10%
3. Administration and Operations 10%
Total 100%
Description of activities is as follows:
1. Redevelopment Activities: The TI expected to be used to carry out project
development activities as further described in the Project Area Plan. Activities may
include, but not be limited to, land acquisition, public improvements, infrastructure
improvements, loans, grants, and other incentives to public and private entities.
2. Housing: The tax increment expected to be used for housing activities pursuant to
Utah Code 17C. Housing funds generated from the District’s portion of tax increment
shall be geographically restricted for use within the Project Area.
3. Administration and Operations: The tax increment expected to be used to cover the
RDA’s operating costs of administering and implementing the Project Area Plan.
II. BUDGET PRIORITIES
Priorities for the allocation of TIF are as follows:
1. Housing: The RDA will restrict the 10% of tax increment set aside for the
following housing activities:
a. Affordable Family Housing: Development of new housing units that
include 3+ bedrooms and are affordable to households at or below 80% of
the area median income as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development.
b. Workforce Housing: Development of new housing units affordable to low
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
6
and middle-income workers, including teachers and school district
employees.
2. Neighborhood Safety Improvements: The RDA will work with the Salt Lake
City School District to identify and prioritize improvement projects to increase
neighborhood safety.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 17C726E8-ADEB-4519-BE5F-F65CB1B2896B
R-15-2020 - RDA School District & ILA (9-Line) -
Approved 9/29/20
Final Audit Report 2020-10-13
Created:2020-10-08
By:DeeDee Robinson (deedee.robinson@slcgov.com)
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAe5hAVH8zZAl8Rh6tw0s0wge06ls8KHxi
"R-15-2020 - RDA School District & ILA (9-Line) - Approved 9/29
/20" History
Document created by DeeDee Robinson (deedee.robinson@slcgov.com)
2020-10-08 - 10:52:10 PM GMT- IP address: 204.124.13.151
Document emailed to Amy Fowler (amy.fowler@slcgov.com) for signature
2020-10-08 - 10:54:14 PM GMT
Email viewed by Amy Fowler (amy.fowler@slcgov.com)
2020-10-12 - 5:40:00 PM GMT- IP address: 136.36.122.143
Document e-signed by Amy Fowler (amy.fowler@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2020-10-12 - 5:40:08 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 136.36.122.143
Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) for signature
2020-10-12 - 5:40:11 PM GMT
Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com)
2020-10-13 - 10:25:47 PM GMT- IP address: 204.124.13.151
Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2020-10-13 - 10:25:57 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 204.124.13.151
Document emailed to Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com) for signature
2020-10-13 - 10:26:00 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2020-10-13 - 11:02:35 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 204.124.13.151
Agreement completed.
2020-10-13 - 11:02:35 PM GMT