19 of 1959 - A resolution amending Section 4 of Resolution No. 5 passed by the Board of Commissioners on June 19t a
REMARKS i
Resolution to 19
Bp,f ommusrnner Adiel Re $ 6V lty
�. L
Aliending Section 4 7.9:2:"
acluti#in
; s.;5,pesaed.,by.the fCo*195g.
Presented he Board of Commsw 1
_, ..
P ed to.t ; !
II AND PASSED !I
' ':-.::.'•' 1: ,-, ‘4,, :. ' ' - ' ' li )(slityyryty.14 '\,(tiVtfINIS,044x1 . . '''
1
1 1 'DEC-2 9 ig59
Cl2Y RECORDER
1 •
a
h
Date Filed
--e4e#bar.24th...-9.-9 �
I�
. ._ , ,.. Address
_ , •
An 24. i-s9 QP •
ROLL CALL vl Salt Lake City,Utah, Deeember_.29 , 195--.9---
VOTING Aye Nay
I move that the Resolution be adopted.
Burbidge . .
Christensen . .
Geurts .
Romney . .
RESOLUTION
Mr. Chairman .
Result . . .
Whereas, by Resolution No. 5 passed by the Board of Commissioners
of Salt Lake City, Utah, on June 19, 1958, it was proposed that certain
improvements be constructed on certain streets in Salt Lake City, Utah,
and that such proposed improvement district be known as Curb and Gutter
Extension No. 220; and
WHEREAS, Section 4 of said resolution directed the City Recorder
to give notice of intention to make the proposed improvements and of the
time within which protests against the proposed improvements or the
creation of said district may be filed and considered by publication in
a newspaper having general circulation in Salt Lake City, said publication
to be in three (3) consecutive issues of said paper, the first publication
to be not less than twenty (20) days prior to the date fixed for the first
meeting of the Board of Commissioners; and
WHEREAS, said resolution should have directed the City Recorder
to provide the required notice by publication in a newspaper having general
circulation in Salt Lake City for the period of twenty (20) consecutive
issues of said paper;
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners of Salt
Lake City, Utah, that Section 4 of Resolution No. 5 passed by the Board
of Commissioners of Salt Lake City, Utah, on June 19, 1953, be, and the
same hereby is, amended to read as follows:
"SECTION 4. Written protests against the proposed improvements
or against the creation of said district must be presented and filed
in the Office of the City Recorder on or before the 16th day of July,
1958, at the hour of 5:00 o'clock P.M., and on the 17th day of July,
1958, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock A.M., at the City Hall of said
City such protests shall be heard and considered by the Board of
Commissioners. The City Recorder is hereby directed to give notice
- 2 -
of intention to make the proposed improvements and of the time within
which protests against the proposed improvements or the creation of said
district may be filed and the date when such protests will be heard
and considered be published in a newspaper having general circulation
in Salt Lake City, said publication to be in twenty (20) consecutive
issues of said paper. The first publication to be not less than twenty
(20) days prior to the date fixed for the first meeting of the Board
of City Commissioners and by mailing said notice by United States Mail ,
postage prepaid, to the owners of the property affected by, or specially
benefited by, such improvements as said property is described in said
notice, insofaf as the names and addresses of said owners can be acer-
tained from the most recent available County assessment books and
addressed to owners as provided by ordinance. Said notices to be mailed
not less than twenty-one (21) days prior to the date whenprotests shall
be heard and considered by the Board of Commissioners. The City
Recorder shall have on file in his office a copy of the Notice of In-
tention for the examination of any interested parties. Said notice
shall be in the form of the notice attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Be it further resolved that the Board of Commissioners of Salt Lake
City, Utah, hereby ratify and approve the publication of the notice
of intention referred to above in each issue of the Deseret News com-
mencing June 25, 1958, and ending July 15, 1958."
t_ l rti/ ate,
CI y
- 3 -
Upon the motion of Commissioner , the
foregoing resolution was duly considered for adoption. The resolution
was thereupon put to a vote and unanimously adopted on the following recorded
vote:
Those voting AYE:
D _
Those voting NAY:
i