Loading...
5 of 1915 - A resolution that the City pay from its general funds the amount of assessment which would otherwise REMARKS:- esolution No, 5 ; eo ,! YORRT9 1. f 117iat 'Ole city from its d genera]. f sds the &mount of aeseas*ent w S.oh would other z ,C w"ie�r;•ai ie T3.ed upon aertaiti to Y k ad'::paar'§,::of ppound affected' b Sewer IExtenaian No. 3 8,and arfai h were not included fn the 04t ©e otedtion t tIp111�I. Law'Deoart 1. ��� 1 : �b ��.25 19 `^ wx�Waco . AIP ADOPTED a '1 ,5 o4�*r woat� ROLL CALL VOTING Yes No Salt Lake City,Utah,.._.. Jan.....26,.._.._...._1915. rearman ✓ —_-_ I move that R No.T .._.._......._..of..... ........_.....Law_.Department ............ Jells 1 �� be Received itakad and filed and the resolution be adopted. awrence ,_-- • d IOrrie __ _— 4 I V... \-4 J A Ir.Chairman _...____-_ exult Passed by the Board of Commissioners of Salt Lake City,Utah, / .. Janx.... 5..... .191 5 City Eteeorder. Mayor H.J ATTORNEY IRY SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION RON MYERS ww_ OLLA`ND ns-Is.ANTS January 26, 1915 Honorable Board of Commissioners, Salt Lake City, Utah. Gentlemen: In the matter of resolution No. 5, by Commissioner Morris, that the City pay from its general fund the amount of assessment which would otherwise be levied upon certain lots and parts of ground afected by Sewer Extension No. 528 and which were not included in the Notice of Intention, presented to your honorable body and referred to this department January 25, 1915, I respectfully say: The question,as I understand it, involved in this refer- ence to this department, is whether the sums specified should be paid from the general funds or from the sewer bond issue on account of sewers. I am of the opinion that these sums should be paid from the general funds, because the City expects to get this money back from the persons whose property abuts on the sewer when they connect with it- and further for the reason that these sums that are expect- ed to be paid are not the City's portion of the cost of the sewer, and hence would not properly come out of the sewer bond fund. I herewith return the above mentioned resolution. Yours respectfully, HJL/ S f City Attorney. RESOLUTION . I:HEREAS, In the notice of intention published by authority of the City Commission on Sewer Extension No. 328, there was omitted from the specific descriptions contained in such notice certain lots end parts of lots benefited by such extension, end which were intended to be included in such notice, and upon which it was intended that a special tax should be levied for the purpose of defraying a portion of the cost of such work, and for the reason aforesaid such tax may not at this time be properly levied thereon: NO" THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the city pay from its general funds the amount of the assessment which would otherwise be levied upon all lots or parts of lots benefited by such exten- sion, end which were not specifically described in the notice of intention as published; that such payment be made to the contractor from time to time as partial estimates are issued end approved by the Commission for such portion of the lots and parts of lots so omitted es aforesaid, as would otherwise properly have fallen within any given partial estimate. BE. IT FURTHER RESOLVED That a copy of this resolution certified by the City Recorder, be delivered to Henry C. Ulen, the Contractor fdr the construction of such extension. n_, ,tit V�i i a Adopted by the Board of Commissioners6f 'alt Lake City, Utah, January 25th, _14 5. / / rt tag , . J^ �1 e City Recorder / -Mayor