Loading...
8 of 1962 - A resolution declaring the intention of the City Commission of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Sta I , c , IIV 4 i i ._ Resolution No. - 8 Herbert F. Smart , COMMISSIONER . , 'I Declaring the intention of the i City Commission of Salt Lake City, , Salt Lake County, State of Utah, to construct certain improvements on certain streets within said City, to create a special Curb and Gutter Improvement District 4 No. 328 in said City; to defray th. - : cost and expenses of said improv, ments by special assessments: Providing for a Notice of In— . . tention to authorize such improve k II, ments and fixing a time and place for protests against such improv- , ments or the creation of such I Curb and Gutter Extension Special ' 'TI Improvement District. ,• , ,, Presented i AtoNthDe Board of GoEmomissionest l' I MAY 1 01962 . . ,. ) ik,httfkilivtk(?61/4.1A144 1 CITY RECORDER . ! , ', . , , .:,', . . . . . . . . ., . . , , `: , 0,- , , „, ;II I , '''' I xe oi.s ROLL CALL Salt Lake City, Utah, May 10 , 196 2 VOTING Aye Nay �,,,,.. I move that the Resolution be adopted. Christensen Harrison . . . ✓ )) Smart 1 v-r.=L l� : �i.rr-ef L'/ Romney . . . Mr. Chairman . / RESOLUTION Result . A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN SAID CITY CONSISTING OF GRADING, CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS, CURB AND GUTTER (WHERE IT DOES NOT NOW EXIST), TO CONSTRUCT FOUR FOOT SIDEWALK WHERE, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, IT IS PRACTICAL TO DO SO, TO CONSTRUCT A DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITH CON- CRETE WATERWAYS, INLET AND OUTLET BOXES, ETC. , TO REMOVE ALL EXISTING NON-CONFORMING IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WAY OF NEW IMPROVEMENTS, TO CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAYS FROM THE NEW CURB AND GUTTER TO THE STREET EDGE OF SIDEWALKS, AND WHERE SIDEWALK DOES NOT EXIST, TO CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAYS OF THE TYPE AND TO THE LIMITS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, TO CREATE A SPECIAL CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 323 IN SAID CITY; TO DEFRAY THE COST AND EXPENSES OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS BY SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: PROVIDING FOR A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PROTESTS AGAINST SUCH IMPROVE- MENTS OR THE CREATION OF SUCH CURB AND GUTTER EXTENSION SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of Salt Lake City, Sale Lake County, State of Utah: SECTION 1 . The Board of Commissioners of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, has determined and hereby determines that it w: 11 be in the best interest of said City to grade, construct sidewalks, curb and gutter (where it does not now exist), as specified on the plans, specifications and profiles on file in the office of the City Engineer, concrete waterways, inlet and outlet boxes, etc., pavement consisting of two inch thick stone- filled sheet asphalt wearing surface placed on a six inch thick compacted gravel base; the said streets to be improved and boundaries of said Curb and Gutter Extension Special Improvement District, all more particularly described in the Notice of Intention to construct the proposed improvements hereinafter set forth. SECTION 2. The proposed district shall be known as Curb and Gutter Extension No. 323 cf Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. SECTION 3. The City shall pay the cost and expenses of improvements to be constructed on streets and avenues on property owned by said City. -2- Such part of the cost and expenses of the proposed improvements as is not paid by theCity shall be assessed against the lots and lands adjoining, abutting, contiguous or adjacent to the proposed improvements. SECTION 4. Written protests against the proposed improvements or against the creation of said district must be presented and filed in the office of the City Recorder on or before the 12th day of June 1962, at the hour of 5:00 o'clock P.M., and on the 13th day of June , 1962, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock A.M., at the City Hall of said City such protests shall be heard and considered by the Board of Commissioners. The City Recorder is hereby directed to give notice of intention to make the proposed improvements and of the time within which protests against the proposed improvements or the creation of said district may be filed and the date when such protests will be heard and considered, by publication in a newspaper having general circulation in Salt Lake City, said publication to be in each issue of said newspaper for a period of at least twenty (20) days, the first publi- cation to be not less than twenty (20) days prior to the date fixed for the meeting of the Board of City Commissioners to consider such protests and by mailing said notice by United States Mail, postage prepaid, to the owners of the property affected by, or specially benefited by, such improvements as said property is described in said notice, insofar as the names and addresses of said owners can be ascertained from the most recent available County Assessment books, and addressed to owners as provided by ordinance. Said notices shall be mailed not later than five (5) days after the first publication of such notice. The City Recorder shall have on file in his office a copy of the Notice of Intention for the examination of any inter,-sted parties. Said notice shall be in the following form, to-wit: NOTICE• NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the Board of Commissioners of Salt Lake City, Utah, of the intention of such Board of Commissioners to make the following described improvements: It is proposed to make such improvements that will cause all streets in the extension to be paved with a two inch thick stonefilled sheet asphalt wearing surface placed on a six inch thick compacted gravel base, to construct standard curb and gutter where it does not now exist, to construct four foot sidewalk where, in the opinion of the Engineer, it is practical to do so, to construct a drainage system with concrete waterways, inlet and outlet boxes, etc., to remove all existing non-conforming improvements in the way of new improvements, to construct driveways from the new curb and gutter to the street edge of sidewalks, and where sidewalk does not exist, to construct driveways of the type and to the limits directed by the Engineer, and to do all other work necessary to complete the project in accordance with Salt Lake City standards. It is to be noted that there will not be any grading beyond limits of the construction area nor procurement of slope easements in bringing cut and fill areas to grade nor construction of retaining walls, fences or steps. All of the frontage of streets in this district upon which improve- ments are to be made, will be assessed in accordance with the improvements constructed. Special attention is called to that portion of Columbus Street from approximately 350 feet, north of Girard Avenue to 6th North Street and Girard Avenue, from DeSoto Street to East Capitol Street where, due to un- usual characteristics of the terrain and various encroachments on the ground, it has been decided that sidewalk can be constructed on one side of the street only and, as the walk must serve to benefit both sides of the street, frontages on each side of the street will be assessed for one-half of the cost of constructing the sidewalk. Credit to abutting property owners for street improvements made under proper permits from the office of the City Engineer'and extensions previously built and assessed will be made and allowed so that the property will not be re-assessed for those prior im- provements so constructed. Credits for corner lot exemptions or partial exemptions will be made as provided by State Statutes and City Ordinances. This extension will be constructed within the following described -2- area and boundaries and upon the following named streets: AREA: Blocks 9 to 13 inclusive and 15 to 22 inclusive, Plat "Jr', Salt Lake City Survey. BOUNDARIES: North - 6th North Street South - 4th North Street West - Victory Road East - East Capitol Boulevard STREETS: Along the following named streets the abutting property will be assessed for improvements built at the herein below estimated rates per front foot of abutting property for designated widths of roadway measured out from the street edge of the gutter to the center of the roadway, for concrete curb and gutter, where they do not now exist, and sidewalk, as designated on the working drawings, and by the engineer, together with the abutter's portion of all miscellaneous costs of the project as follows: COLUMBUS STREET - west side - from a point 816 feet north of Zane Avenue to 6th North Street - Rate No. 1 . COLUMBUS STREET - east side - from a point 350 feet north of Girard Avenue to 6th North Street - Rate No. 1, which includes proposed assessment to property owners on east side for sidewalk to be constructed on west side of street only. GIRARD AVENUE - both sides - between DeSoto and East Capitol Streets - Rate No. 1 , which includes a proposed assessment to property owners on North side for sidewalk to be constructed only on South side. COKUMBUS STREET - west side - from a point 798.61 feet north of Zane Avenue, thence north 17.39 feet - Rate No. 2. COLUMBUS STREET - east side - from a point 150 feet north of Girard Avenue, thence north 56.31 feet - Rate No. 3. ZANE AVENUE - north side - from Columbus Street, thence east 94.59 feet - Rate No. 3. ZANE AVENUE - north side - from Cortez Street, thence west 140 feet - Rate No. 3. ZANE AVENUE - north side - from a point 160 feet west of Cortez Street- thence west 23.51 feet - Rate No. 3. ZANE AVENUE - south side - between Columbus and Cortez Streets - Rate No. 3. CORTEZ STREET both sides - between 4th North and 6th North Streets - Rate No. 3. COLUMBUS STREET - west side - from a point 662.91 feet north of Zane Avenue, thence north 135.70 feet - Rate No. 4. COLUMBUS STREET - east side - from a point 206.31 feet north of Girard Avenue, thence north 143.69 feet - Rate No. 4. ZANE AVENUE - north side - from DeSoto Street west 82.91 feet - Rate No. 4. ZANE AVENUE - north side - from DeSoto Street east 116.49 feet -Rate No. 4. COLUMBUS STREET - west side - from a point 300 feet north of Zane Avenue, thence north 316 feet - Rate No. 5. COLUMBUS STREET - east side - from Girard Avenue north 150 feet - Rate No. 5. -3- ZANE AVENUE - north side - from a point 94.59 feet east of Columbus Street, thence east 45.41 feet - Rate No. 5. GIRARD AVENUE - both sides - between Columbus and DeSoto Streets - Rate No. 5. COLUMBUS STREET - west side - from a point 616 feet north of Zane Avenue, thence north 46.91 feet - Rate No. 6. ZANE AVENUE - north side - from a point 82.91 feet west of DeSoto Street, thence west 57.09 feet - Rate No. 6. GIRARD AVENUE - south side - from Cortez Street west 75 feet - Rate No. 7. EAST CAPITOL STREET - west side - between Girard and 6th North Street Rate No. 8. EAST CAPITOL STREET - east side - from Girard Avenue, thence north 1003.50 feet - Rate No. 8. EAST CAPITOL STREET - east side - from 6th North Street, thence south 62.50 feet - Rate No. 9. IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATED COSTS Rate Proposed Front Feet of Estimated Cost Total No. Improvements Benefited Property Per Front Foot Est. Cost 1 . 1/2 of 4' walk, C & G 13 ft. paving & misc. 1,877.00 10.32 19,370.64 2. 1/2 of 4' walk, 13 ft. paving and misc. 17.39 7.49 130.25 3. C & G, 13 ft. paving and misc. 3,374.06 9.32 31 ,446.24 4. 13 ft. paving and misc. 328.79 6.49 2,133.85 5. 4' walk, C & G, 13 ft. paving and misc. 771 .41 11.32 8,732.36 6. 4' walk, 13 ft. paving and misc. 104L00 8.49 882.96 7. 1/2 of 4' walk 75.00 1 .00 75.00 8. Modified 7-A C & G, 7 ft. paving and misc. 2,069.50 7.18 14,859.01 9. 7 ft. paving and misc. 62.50 4.94 308.75 Total Estimated Cost of Property Owners' Portion (including City as an abutter) $77,939.06 Total Estimated Cost of City's Portion Proper $19,492.07 Total Estimated Cost of Project Exclusive of Extra Costs of Private Driveways $97,431 . 13 City's Estimated Cost as an Abutter: West side of Columbus St. - 150 ft. at Rate No. 1 $ 1,548.00 West side of Columbus St. - 33 ft. at Rate No. 5 373.56 South side of Girard Ave. - 140 ft. at Rate No. 1 1,444.80 West side of Cortez St. - 200 ft. at Rate No. 3 1,864.00 East side of Cortez St. - 425 ft. at Rate No. 3 3,961 .00 Total Estimated Cost of City as an Abutter $ 9,191.36 Total Estimated Cost of City's Portion Proper 19,492.07 -4- TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY'S COST PROPER AND AS AN ABUTTER $28,683.43 All other necessary things shall be done to complete the whole project in a proper and workmanlike manner according to plans, profiles and speci- fications on file in the office of the City Engineer of Sail Lake City, and to defray the abutters' portion of the cost and expense of said improve- ments by special tax or assessment to be paid in ten (10) equal annual installments plus five per cent (5%) interest on the unpaid balance levied according to the front or linear foot frontage upon and against all lots, pieces or parcels of land, to be benefited and affected by said improvements. The whole amount of the tax may be paid without interest within 15 days after notification by the Salt Lake City Treasurer of the amount due. All non-conforming improvements, such as lawns, sprinkling systems, rock gardens, driveways, curbs, gutters, culverts, walls, fences, trees, etc., which have been built or installed by abutting property owners within the areas to be improved, must be removed by the property owners or at their expense, prior to the commencement of the project. If these improvements are not removed by the property owners, they will be removed by the Con- tractor and they will be disposed of by him as directed by the Engineer. Parking areas, i .e., those areas between the back or new curb and the street edges of existing or new sidewalks, not occupied by housewalks or driveways will be brought to finished grade using the existing soil . In the areas where only curb and gutter and paving are to be constructed, and the terrain consists of hills and gulleys, the Contractor will grade from a point two (2) feet in back of the curb on a 1:1 ratio slope for cut areas and a 1 1/2:1 ratio slope for flll areas. No fine grading, top soiling, seeding, sodding or installing of sprinkling systems will be done under this improvement extension. The abutters' estimated costs per front foot do not include the cost of private driveways, the cost of which will vary according to width and amount of parking area to be covered. These costs are estimated to be approximately $1.00 per square foot for open type driveways and approxi- mately $2.00 per square foot for driveways requiring pipe or culvert in the gutterline. The cost of driveways will be assessed against the properties benefited in addition to the assessment for sidewalk, curb and gutter, paving and miscellaneous. -5- The estimated cost of the City's portion proper consists of the cost of one-half of all general excavation, the cost of the paving of all intersections, the cost of all drainage structures and pipe, the cost of removing and replacing sidewalk and existing curb and gutter in street intersections, made necessary by the new improvement. The estimated cost of City's portion as an abutter is the costs of new improvements fronting 183 feet along the west side of Columbus Street and 140 feet along the south side of Girard Avenue, 200 feet along the west side of Cortez Street and 500 feet along the east side of Cortez Street. All protests and objections to the carrying out of such intention must be presented in writing!, stating therein lot, block or description of property, together with the number of front feet (or square feet) to the City Recorder on or before the 12th day of June , 1962, the Board of Commissioners at its first regular meeting thereafter, to-wit: the 13th day of June , 1962, will consider the proposed levy and hear and consider such protests and objections to said improve- ments as shall have been made. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH. DATED: May 10, 1962 A"VW6ktwoor-i First Publication May 17, 1962 Last Publication June 6, 1962 City Commissioner Herbert F. Smart thereupon moved that the.Board of Com- missioners adopt the foregoing resolution. The resolution was thereuponput to a Vote and unanimously adopted on the following recorded?vote: Those voting AYE: n jI Those voting NAY: NONE ATTEST: 4910 City Reco ttlitAbtrr‘j