Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout030 of 1999 - Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 48 of 1998 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, i0 99-1 B 99-6 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. 30 of 1999 (Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 48 of 1998 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 1998-99) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 48 OF 1998 WHICH APPROVED, RATIFIED AND FINALIZED THE BUDGET OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, INCLUDING THE EMPLOYMENT STAFFING DOCUMENT, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1998 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1999. PREAMBLE On June 16, 1998, the Salt Lake City Council approved, ratified and finalized the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1998 and ending June 30, 1999, in accordance with the requirements of Section 1 18, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget, including the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah. The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. The City Council fixed a time and place for a public hearing to be held on April 20, 1999 to consider the attached proposed amendments to the budget, including the employment staffing document, and ordered notice thereof be published as required by law. Notice of said public hearing to consider the amendments to said budget, including the employment staffing document, was duly published and a public hearing to consider the attached amendments to said budget, including the employment staffing document, was held on April 20, 1999, in accordance with said notice at which hearing all interested parties for and against the budget amendment proposals were heard and all comments were duly considered by the City Council. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 48 of 1998. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2 1998 and ending June 30, 1999, in accordance with the requirements of Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated. SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, with the Utah State Auditor. SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ` vi day of 20th April ATTEST: IEF DEPUTY C TY R CORDER CHAIRPERSOIN1`' 3 Transmitted to the Mayor on April 20, 1999 Mayor's Action: xxx Approved Vetoed ATTEST: IEF PU Y C.RDER (SEAL) Bill No. 30 of 1999. Published: April 30, 1999 G:\ordina99\Amending budget 4-20.doc 41 MAY ri Cacb34,..) By 4 Issues in Budget Amendment - April 1999 1. Class C Street Projects $3,230,000 2. Jordan River Parkway Sidewalk $4,493 3. Concrete Replacement Special Improvement $200,000 District 4. Downtown Alliance $61,641 5. Building Services and Licensing Engineering $11,500 Consultant Fees 6. Fire Department Computer -Aided Dispatch $30,000 and Records Management 7. Community Emergency Winter Housing $61,958 Program 2 Issue Request #1 - Class C Street Projects $ 3,230,000 Budget Impact CIP Fund The City should create the CIP budgets funded by Class C Road Funds. The projects are $1,500,000 for Asphalt Overlay & Micro Surface Sealing of Streets, $780,000 for Local Street Reconstruction - Phase 6, and $950,000 for Pioneer Road 1300 South - 1700 South. The total amount to be budgeted for these projects is $3,230,000. Capital Improvement Project Applications for the 1999/2000 fiscal year have been submitted for the above projects and amounts. Funding comes from the Utah State Highway User Fund and is primarily funded by the State gasoline tax (Class C Funds). For the past four years, specific Class C projects to be completed in the current construction season have been budgeted in the spring in advance of the fiscal year funding. Creating these budgets now will allow these projects to accept bids and be completed during the 1999 construction season. Fund Department / Category Decrease Increase CIP / Asphalt Overlay & Micro Surface Sealing of Streets (R) $1,500,000 CIP Fund CIP / Asphalt Overlay & Micro Surface Sealing of Streets (E) $1,500,000 CIP / Local Street Reconstruction - Phase 6 (R) $780,000 CIP /Local Street Reconstruction - Phase 6 (E) $780,000 CIP / Pioneer Road 1300 S - 1700 S (R) $950,000 CIP / Pioneer Road 1300 S - 1700 S (E) $950,000 Issue Request #2 - Jordan River Parkway Sidewalk $ 4,493 Budget Impact CIP Fund The City should create a budget of $4,493 to recognize a contribution by a private developer to a sidewalk within the Jordan River Project. A private developer constructed a new residential subdivision (1050 West 1175 South) adjacent to the Jordan River Parkway. The plans for his 3 development required the construction of sidewalk within the area of the City's project. The developer's contractor installed sidewalk in an alignment inconsistent with the approved plans. The developer has agreed to the installation of additional sidewalk, but requested the City's contractor complete the work. After creation of the budget, the work will be accomplished through normal City procedures. Fund Department / Category Decrease Increase CIP Fund CIP / Jordan River Parkway Sidewalk(R) CIP / Jordan River Parkway Sidewalk(E) $4,493 $4,493 Issue Request #3 - Concrete Replacement Special Improvement District - FY 1997-98 Project $ 200,000 Budget Impact CIP Fund The City should increase the budget by $200,000 for the Concrete Replacement Special Improvement District (SID) project established in FY 1997- 98. A Concrete Replacement SID project involves the reconstruction of deteriorated concrete in the public way. The City and the residential property owners share the improvement costs approximately on a 50/50 basis. The typical time frame from receipt of a petition to construction is approximately 18 months when Capital Improvement Program funding is available. Activities that occur in this time frame include meeting with property owners, defining the project scope, designing the project, preparing project cost estimates, determining the availability of Capital Improvement funds, and meeting all SID bonding requirements. The City's portion of Job No. 101007 was originally budgeted at $650,000. The special improvement district has recently been created and the property owners' total is expected to be $600,000. The updated estimated cost to be assessed to the property owners exceeds the current available budget of $400,000. This increased budget of $200,000 will allow the contract to be awarded and will pay for miscellaneous costs such as engineering fees, testing and bonding. Fees received through the SID assessment will fund this increase. 4 Fund Department / Category Decrease Increase CIP Fund CIP/Concrete Replacement SID FY 1997-98 (R) CIP/Concrete Replacement SID FY 1997-98 (E) $200,000 $200,000 Issue Request #4 - Downtown Alliance $ 61,641 Budget Impact Central Business Improvement District Fund The City should appropriate $61,641 from the available fund balance of the Central Business Improvement District assessment to distribute to the Downtown Alliance. The current year budget was not set high enough to reflect the contract payments the City would make to the Alliance during the fiscal year. In 1997, Salt Lake City entered into a contract with the Downtown Alliance to provide the management services specified in the Central Business Improvement District. The special assessment was for a three-year period running from November 1997 to October 2000. However, the City's contract with the Alliance went from November 1997 through December 2000. The discrepancy in the length of the assessment and the length of the contract resulted in a misunderstanding as to how much should be budgeted on an annual basis for the Alliance's quarterly payments. This request will rectify that misunderstanding. In order to keep its contractual obligation to the Alliance, the City is requesting that $61,641 of the current $450,317 fund balance from Fund 46- 97460 be appropriated. The current cash balance is $465,842. There are no additional funding requirements for these transactions. Fund Department / Category Decrease Increase Central Business Improvement District Fund Central Business Improvement District (R) Central Business Improvement District (E) Source of funds / Central Business Improvement District fund balance (FB) not posted $61,641 $61,641 $61,641 5 Issue Request #5 - Building Services and Licensing Engineering Consultant Fees $ 11,500 Budget Impact General Fund The City should increase the Building Services and Licensing Division's Engineering Consultant budget by $11,500. The increased budget will cover expenses created by the unexpected need for a second structural analysis on building plans that have had significant changes made after the initial analysis has been completed. When a second plan review is required, the developer is required to pay an additional fee to cover the cost of the review. It is expected that $11,500 will be collected through the end of the current fiscal year. This appropriation will recognize the additional revenue that CED has received to date. Fund Department / Category Decrease 'Increase General Fund Community and Economic Development -Business Services / Engineering Consultant Fees (R) Community and Economic Development -Business Services / Engineering Consultant Fees (E) $11,500 $11,500 Issue Request #6 -Fire Department Computer -Aided Dispatch and Records Management $ 30,000 Budget Impact General Fund Contingency The City should increase the Fire Department Budget for preliminary costs associated with the purchase of a new Computer Aided Dispatch and Records Management System (CAD/RMS). The current Fire Department CAD system was purchased from Command Data Systems Corporation and installed in 1988. Some Fire Department records are managed on software -based systems, such as Fire and Medical Incident reports, but others are mostly on paper at this time. Tests for Y2K compliance were run on the current CAD system in the Fall of 1998, and the results indicated that the CAD system does not comply to the protocols for compliance. Since the CAD was purchased, the manufacturing 6 company has been sold several times, and any upgrades to insure Y2K compliance are not available. In 1994 the Public Safety Technology Initiative established the need to purchase a new CAD/RMS system. Both the City Administration and the City Council funded that initiative. A new CAD system was purchased from SCC Corporation in 1996, but was unable to meet the needs of the Fire Department. The City is currently in litigation to recover costs associated with the termination of the SCC CAD contract. A Request for Proposal (RFP) process for a new CAD/RMS began in early 1998 and was completed in late 1998. A selection committee evaluated the proposals, and two possible vendors were identified for further evaluation in February 1999. After on -site visits to the two vendors were made, the committee unanimously chose FDM Software of Vancouver, British Columbia, as the vendor of choice. The Fire Department would like to begin initial setup and testing of the system this fiscal year. The cost of the initial setup and testing is $30,000. This amount, if funded, would lead to a corresponding decrease in funding requested in the FY 2000 budget. This initial setup and testing is needed to meet Y2K deadlines. The entire CAD system will be presented to the Council as part of the Mayor's Recommended Budget within the Fire Department's budget. If this system is not funded in the FY 2000 budget, the $30,000 is not refundable. [Fund Department / Category Decrease !Increase General Fund Fire / Capital Expense, CAD/RMS (E) Non -Departmental / Contingency (E) $30,000 $30,000 Issue Request #7 - Community Emergency Winter Housing Program $ 61,958 Budget Impact General Fund The City's share of the Community Emergency Winter Housing program located in Midvale is assessed at $61,958. This assessment represents the City's prorata share based on population. The total municipal share is 30% of the total cost of operation. Funding for this request will come from increasing the revenue source for communication franchise fees. An audit of this revenue source has revealed that the City was owed additional fees. These fees have been collected. Support of this program will continue in the FY 2000 budget. [Fund Department / Category 'Decrease 'Increase eneral Fund Non Dept./Winter Housing program (E) Franchise fees LR) $61,958 $61,958 8