Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout007 of 2026 - Text Amendment - Disposition of Alleys and StreetsSALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. 7 of 2026 Changes to City Code 14.52 governing the disposition of the City Owned Public Way and amending 20.16.050 to make the disposition process consistent in the context of subdivision application. An ordinance rewriting 14.52 of the Salt Lake City Code to address the disposition of streets and alleys and amending 20.16.050 of the Salt Lake City Code to make the disposition process consistent in the context of a subdivision application. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on September 24, 2025, to consider proposed changes to City Code initiated by Mayor Mendenhall to clarify the City’s disposition processes for streets and alleys; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. The text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 14.52.010 through 14.52.050 is repealed and replaced as provided below in Section 3. Chapter 14.52.060 through 14.52.090 is added as proposed in Section 3. SECTION 2. The text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 20.16.050.B is hereby amended as follows: B. A subdivision application that includes closing or vacating a public street or alley within the public way or vacating an easement that the city has a right to, shall be decided by the city council after receiving a recommendation from the planning commission or the planning director if no public hearing by the planning commission is required. The process shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 21A.10 and shall comply with all other applicable requirements of 14.52. SECTION 3. CHAPTER 14.52 DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED PUBLIC WAY SECTION: 14.52.010: Purpose 14.52.020: Applicability 14.52.030: Definitions 14.52.040: Application Requirements 14.52.050: Process to Close or Vacate City Owned Streets and Alleys Within the Public Way 14.52.060: Factors for Closing or Vacating City Owned Streets and Alleys Within the Public Way 14.52.070: Disposing of Vacated City Owned Streets and Alleys Within the Public Way 14.52.080: Closures 14.52.090: Appeals 14.52.010: PURPOSE: The purpose of this chapter is to establish a process for the city council to decide if a city owned street or alley within the public way should be closed or vacated. While the City expresses a preference for the retention of all public ways, the decision to close or vacate a city owned public way is at the discretion of the city council. 14.52.020: APPLICABILITY: A. This chapter applies to any petition to close or vacate a city owned street or alley within the public way. B. Petitions that request to close or vacate a public street located within a platted subdivision are also subject to the subdivision amendment process in Title 20. 14.52.030: DEFINITIONS: A. The following definitions apply to the terms found in this chapter. 1. Alley: A public way within a block primarily intended for service and access to abutting property by vehicles. An alley is not designed for general travel and not used to certify property addresses. 2. City Owned: The public way that is subject to the jurisdiction of Salt Lake City. 3. Closure: The act of eliminating the thoroughfare nature or passageway access of the general public to a city owned public way, while retaining public ownership of the property. 4. Public Way: As cited in City Code 14.32.015, means and includes all public rights of way and easements, pathways, walkways and sidewalks, public streets, public roads, public highways, public alleys, and public drainageways including the surface, subsurface and above surface space, now or hereafter existing as such within the city. It does not, however, include utility easements not within public ways of the city. 5. Street: A vehicular way which may also serve for all or part of its width as a way for pedestrian traffic, whether called street, highway, thoroughfare, parkway, throughway, road, avenue, boulevard, lane, place, alley, mall or otherwise designated. 5. Vacation: The act of eliminating, in full or in part, city ownership of a public way. 14.52.040: APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: A. Eligibility to Apply: 1. The mayor may initiate a petition to close or vacate a city owned street or alley within the public way by signature on a document that includes the purpose for the closure or vacation and describing the specific location. 2. The city council may initiate a petition to close or vacate a city owned street or alley within the public way by adopting a legislative intent. 3. A property owner who owns land that abuts a public way may request to close or vacate a city owned street or alley within the public way by submitting a petition and all application materials as provided for in this chapter. B. Petition Requirements: 1. A petition submitted by a property owner that is not the city council or the mayor shall include the following information: a. A completed application on a form provided by the planning director. b. The signatures of at least 75% of the property owners owning property that abut the portion of the public way that is proposed to be closed or vacated. c. A written description of the purpose and reasons for the proposed closure or vacation. d. A signed affidavit from the applicant that (1) all owners abutting the public way have received a written notice of the applicant’s desire to close or vacate the public way, and (2) all operators of utilities located within the bounds of the public way have received a written notice of the applicant’s desire to close or vacate the public way. e. A description of any existing structure that may be located within the public way, including the address of the abutting property where the structure may be located. f. A map of the proposed public way that is subject to the closure or vacation that includes the dimensions of the approximate width, length, and area of the proposal. g. A written explanation of how the proposed closure or vacation aligns with the factors in 14.52.050. h. All required fees as outlined in the consolidated fee schedule. 2. If a petition is initiated by the mayor or the city council, then such petition shall identify the department that will submit to the planning director: a. The name and address of each owner of record of land that is adjacent to the public way that is to be closed or vacated or accessed exclusively by or within 300 feet of the public way. b. Proof of written notice to operators of utilities located within the bounds of the public way sought to be vacated or closed. c. The signature of each owner of record identified in subsection 2a that consents to the vacation or closure. 14.52.050: PROCESS TO CLOSE OR VACATE CITY OWNED STREETS OR ALLEYS WITHIN THE PUBLIC WAY: A. Application Submittal: The petition shall be submitted to the planning director with a copy to the City Engineer. After receiving the petition, the planning director shall determine if the application is complete. An application may only be deemed complete if all petition requirements have been submitted and fees paid. B. Incomplete Applications: A petitioner who fails to provide all the required information that is necessary to start a comprehensive, substantive review of the application will be provided with one written notice of missing submittal requirements. The notice shall itemize each item that is missing, including the citation from this code and provide a deadline of 30 days to provide the missing information. If a petitioner fails to submit the information or fails to negotiate a different deadline to submit the information, the petition may be considered withdrawn and closed. C. Public Engagement Period: All petitions to close or vacate a city owned street or alley within the public way shall be subject to the public engagement requirements in 21A.10. D. Public Hearing: If the planning commission holds a public hearing prior to making a recommendation on the matter to the city council, notice of the public hearing shall be subject to the public hearing requirements in 21A.10. Notice shall also be provided to the Utah Department of Transportation as required in Utah Code 72-5-105(5)(b). 1. A public hearing shall be held by the planning commission if, after review by the relevant city departments and the general public, any concerns or objections are raised based on the factors described in 14.52.060. 2. The request is exempt from a public hearing and recommendation from the planning commission if, after review by the City Engineer, relevant city departments, and the general public, no concerns or objections are raised related to the factors described in 14.52.060. In such case, the request shall proceed in accordance with 14.52.050.E with a recommendation from the planning director. E. Planning Commission Recommendation: After a public hearing, the planning commission shall forward a recommendation to the city council regarding the proposed closure or vacation. The recommendation shall be based on the applicable factors listed in this chapter and the evidence, or lack of evidence, presented to the planning commission. The planning commission may recommend approval, approval with modifications or conditions, or denial of the petition. If the planning commission does not act within 90 days of the public hearing, the recommendation shall be considered a denial and forwarded to the city council for decision. F. City Council Public Hearing: The city council shall hold a public hearing before deciding on a petition to close or vacate a city owned street or alley within the public way. The public hearing shall be noticed in the same manner as described in 14.52.040.C. After a public hearing is held, the city council may approve, approve with modifications or conditions, or deny the petition. G. Appraisal and Purchase and Sale Agreement: If the City Council approves a petition to close or vacate a City-owned public way, and payment is required, petitioner will be required to enter into a purchase and sale agreement and to remit payment to the City in an amount equal to the fair market value, as determined by Real Estate Services in accordance with City Code 2.58, adjusted only as authorized by the City Council. The petitioner may be required to obtain, at the petitioner’s sole expense, a current appraisal of the property prepared by a qualified third-party appraiser using a methodology approved by the City. H. Exceptions: 1. The provisions of this section are not required if the city is closing or vacating a public way in accordance with Utah Code that exempts the petitioner from the process herein. 14.52.060: FACTORS FOR CLOSING OR VACATING CITY OWNED STREETS OR ALLEYS WITHIN THE PUBLIC WAY: The following factors should be considered when deciding a petition to close or vacate a city owned street or alley within the public way. A decision to close or vacate a city owned street or alley within the public way is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the city council and is not controlled by any one factor and not all factors will be applicable to every petition. A. Lack Of Use: The city's legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an on-site inspection that the right-of-way does not physically exist for the purpose of providing access. When determining if lack of use exists, the city should consider: 1. The lack of evidence of physical use. A gate, fence, or other similar obstruction installed to prevent access to the public way that has been installed without approval from the city should not be considered evidence of lack of use; 2. Evidence that the public way never functioned to provide access to properties that abut the public way; 3. The presence of accessory buildings, mature trees, or other similar items that can be readily identifiable from photographs, aerial or satellite images, or other records that demonstrate the item has been within the boundaries of the public way prior to April 12, 1995. B. Public Safety: 1. The existence of the public way is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity, unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area. 2. A closure or vacation will not have a detrimental impact on the ability to provide emergency access to the public way or properties abutting the public way; C. Community Purpose: The petitioners are proposing to convert the purpose of the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden; D. Impact on General Plan: The proposed closure or vacation does not negatively impact connectivity for future development that may occur based on the general plan as defined in Title 19. For this factor, the following may be considered: 1. The closure or vacation does not impact any future active transportation project by requiring new drive approaches on a public street that would result in increased conflict points with the active transportation infrastructure or limits the ability of the city to install active transportation infrastructure. 2. The closure or vacation reduces the ability to use the city owned public way to improve overall connectivity in the vicinity based on the scale and intensity of future land use identified in the general plan. 3. If the public way is specifically identified in the general plan on a map or with policies that indicate the public way should be used for current or future connectivity, including a midblock walkway, pedestrian path, trail, service area, access to parking, or alternative transportation uses. 4. The closure or vacation will not jeopardize the ability to implement any policy, action, or any aspect of the adopted general plan. 5. The closure or vacation will not result in a dead end or cul-de-sac in area where street connectivity is identified in a general plan or when continuing the street promotes access to property for future development identified on the applicable future land use map. E. Impact to Property: The proposed closure or vacation will not result in a parcel or lot being deprived of access or landlocked or impact any development plans or permits on properties that intend to use the public way for accessing private property. F. Public Utilities: If the public way is considered essential for the location of future public utilities, or the public way is required for access to public utility infrastructure, any necessary reservations that preserve such space and access will be executed and recorded by the City prior to disposition. The reservation(s) should ensure operations, maintenance (including replacement or upgrading of the infrastructure), and access to subsurface, surface and aerial infrastructure. Reservations should also ensure emergency access to make repairs to any infrastructure within the public way. G . Dimensions: The existing dimensions of the public way are not necessary to provide safe and reasonable public access and reducing the size of the public way is consistent with the other listed factors. 14.52.070: DISPOSING OF VACATED CITY OWNED STREETS OR ALLEYS WITHIN THE PUBLIC WAY: A. If a vacation of a city owned street or alley within the public way is approved by the city council, the area vacated shall be disposed of according to the following: 1. If the public way was created by a recorded subdivision, the vacated public way shall be split down the centerline with each side of the public way vesting to the adjoining owner of record. 2. If the public way was created by a recorded subdivision but not all abutting properties are within the boundaries of the recorded subdivision that the public way is, the vacated public way shall be consolidated into the abutting properties that are within the boundaries of the recorded subdivision. 3. If the public way is not part of a recorded subdivision, the vacated public way shall be split down the centerline with each side of the public way vesting to the adjoining owner of record except where prescribed by Utah State Code. 4. For vacations proposed by the city, the vacated land may be converted to a lot(s) or parcel(s) for future development. 5. If the public way is partially vacated, the vacated portion may be combined with properties on one side of the public way, both sides of the property, or may create a new lot or parcel. 6. Notwithstanding the above, the area may be disposed of in any other configuration authorized by Utah law. B. Payment Required: Payment to the city shall be required prior to the disposition of the associated vacated. area in the following circumstances: 1. Vacation Adjacent to High Density Residential Properties and Other Nonresidential Properties: If the public way abuts properties which are designated as having any other future land use designation other than low density residential as described in 14.52.070.C.1, the public way will be vacated, subject to payment to the city of the fair market value of that right of way property, based upon the value added to the abutting properties. 2. Vacation Adjacent to Mixed Zoning: If a public way abuts both low density residential properties as defined in 14.52.070.C.1 and any other future land use designation, those portions which abut the low density residential properties shall be vacated without requiring payment, and the remainder shall be vacated and sold for fair market value. C. Payment Not Required: Payment to the city shall not be required prior to the disposition of the associated vacated area in the following circumstances: 1. Vacation Adjacent to Low Density Residential Areas: If the public way property abuts properties which are designated on an adopted future land use map that is part of the adopted general plan as having a future density of less than 25 dwelling units per acre, the public way will merely be vacated without requiring payment. 2. Exchanges: The city may agree to a land transfer of the public way area that is subject to a proposed vacation with other land that serves a public purpose or provides a public benefit as determined by the city council. 14.52.080: CLOSURES: A. Public Purpose: The city may choose to close the public way and maintain the use of the land for another public purpose as authorized by applicable state code. B. Private Purpose: Closure sought by a private property owner may be subject to a lease or development agreement to reflect the maintenance responsibilities for the property. 14.52.090: APPEALS: Any party aggrieved by a final decision of the city council as to the closure or vacation of city owned street or alley within the public way may file a petition for review of that decision with the district court within 30 days after the city council's decision becomes final. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published pursuant to Utah Code § 10-3-711 and § 10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this 24th day of March, 2026. ______________________________________ Alejandro Puy, Council Chair  ATTEST:  _________________________  Keith Reynolds, City Recorder  Transmitted to Mayor on ____________________________.    Mayor’s Action:  _________ Approved. ____________ Vetoed. _______________________________________ Erin Mendenhall, Mayor  ATTEST:  _________________________  Keith Reynolds, City Recorder        Bill No. 7 of 2026. Published: __________________  Ordinance Planning ROW Vacation and Closure v.2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: By: ___________________________ Cameron Johnson, Senior City Attorney Cameron Johnson (Mar 31, 2026 11:40:08 MDT) Cameron Johnson 03/31/2026 Alejandro Puy (Apr 17, 2026 11:55:51 MDT) Erin Mendenhall (Apr 24, 2026 14:14:00 MDT) 4 04/24/2026 Ordinance 007 of 2026 - Disposition of Alleys and Streets Final Audit Report 2026-04-24 Created:2026-03-27 By:Caitlin Carlino (caitlin.carlino@slc.gov) Status:Signed Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAaeCH-eHZ515Fd6ec-OVAd3_3kJ7qilMX "Ordinance 007 of 2026 - Disposition of Alleys and Streets" Histo ry Document created by Caitlin Carlino (caitlin.carlino@slc.gov) 2026-03-27 - 6:41:28 PM GMT Document emailed to cameron.johnson@slc.gov for signature 2026-03-27 - 6:43:43 PM GMT Email viewed by cameron.johnson@slc.gov 2026-03-31 - 5:39:24 PM GMT Signer cameron.johnson@slc.gov entered name at signing as Cameron Johnson 2026-03-31 - 5:40:06 PM GMT Document e-signed by Cameron Johnson (cameron.johnson@slc.gov) Signature Date: 2026-03-31 - 5:40:08 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to alejandro.puy@slc.gov for signature 2026-03-31 - 5:40:10 PM GMT Email viewed by alejandro.puy@slc.gov 2026-03-31 - 5:40:14 PM GMT Email viewed by alejandro.puy@slc.gov 2026-04-08 - 3:51:17 PM GMT Email viewed by alejandro.puy@slc.gov 2026-04-14 - 7:08:34 AM GMT Signer alejandro.puy@slc.gov entered name at signing as Alejandro Puy 2026-04-17 - 5:55:49 PM GMT Document e-signed by Alejandro Puy (alejandro.puy@slc.gov) Signature Date: 2026-04-17 - 5:55:51 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) for signature 2026-04-17 - 5:55:53 PM GMT Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) 2026-04-18 - 3:11:07 AM GMT Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) 2026-04-24 - 4:43:24 PM GMT Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) Signature Date: 2026-04-24 - 8:14:00 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Keith Reynolds (Keith.Reynolds@slc.gov) for signature 2026-04-24 - 8:14:02 PM GMT Email viewed by Keith Reynolds (Keith.Reynolds@slc.gov) 2026-04-24 - 9:14:07 PM GMT Document e-signed by Keith Reynolds (Keith.Reynolds@slc.gov) Signature Date: 2026-04-24 - 9:14:33 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed. 2026-04-24 - 9:14:33 PM GMT