Loading...
04/10/1990 - Minutes PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIO UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of the Whole on Tuesday, April 10, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. in Room 325, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Don Hale Nancy Pace Council Chair Hardman presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order by months to hold a meeting with the Council Chair Hardman at 5:00 p.m. Planning Commission. Councilmember Pace asked if the Board of Adjustment would be included in Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive this information session and if Director, was asked to brief the the Council would be addressing Council. She said the Council questions to them. Ms. Gust- would meet as the Redevelopment Jenson said Councilmember Hardman Agency on Thursday, April 12, 1990 had suggested including the Board and they should keep the rental of Adjustment and the staff had rehabilitation documentation from expressed interest in being the Thursday meeting because it involved. would be addressed at the Council Meeting on April 17, 1990. Councilmember Godfrey said to address particular questions to Ms. Gust-Jenson stated the the Board of Adjustment would be Committee of the Whole Meeting on inappropriate. Councilmember Pace Thursday would follow the said she was concerned the Board Redevelopment Agency adjournment of Adjustment was not very at approximately 7:30 p.m. and the familiar with the Master Plan, and only item on this agenda was the problems had arisen when the Board Airport Authority Budget of Adjustment authorized items Discussion. Ms. Gust-Jenson said and then to find out later it was this would be a fairly simple in direct violation of the zoning discussion because the Airport ordinance and the project could Authority and the Airline not be completed. Councilmember Representatives had reviewed the Godfrey said he thought time would budget. be better spent with the Planning Commission. Ms. Gust-Jenson said the packet of information the Staff Councilmember Hardman said he Assistant had dispersed prior to wanted to suggest the Council the meeting did not include the involve the Board of Adjustment in agenda for the Thursday night the meeting to address problems meeting. She said the Council like those that had recently come would receive the agenda when they up in his area. Councilmember convened prior to the Council Hardman said currently he was meeting this evening. involved in helping the community oppose a demolition that had been Ms. Gust-Jenson said July or authorized by the Board of August had been discussed as Adjustment and prior to this 90-116 PROCIPINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI , UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1990 meeting he had been at the Court the Board of Adjustment. The to sit in on the appeal. Council agreed a tentative agenda Councilmember Hardman indicated he should be completed and the agreed it was inappropriate to Planning Commission and the Board list items of discussion but the of Adjustment should be included Board of Adjustment decisions had in selecting the agenda topics. an impact on the entire City and certain items needed to be Ms. Gust-Jenson said the addressed. agenda for the Council Meeting included a resolution recognizing Councilmember Pace said if Earth Week and because the she were able to see an Agenda it resolution had been forwarded from might be easier to make a decision the Mayor' s Office, a on the Board of Adjustment Councilmember had not been participation. Ms. Gust-Jenson assigned to read the Resolution. said the Council staff could She said the Council needed to present an agenda to the Council, decide who would read the the Planning Commission, and the resolution. Councilmember Godfrey Board of Adjustment to receive said he would like to read it. their approval before a final agenda was established. Ms. Gust-Jenson said the agenda was very routine and the meeting Councilmember Kirk said should run smoothly. perhaps the Council could hold an information only session with both Councilmember Hardman asked the Planning Commission and the if the Council had any questions. Board of Adjustment, then convene Councilmember Pace said she did into a facilitation meeting with not understand why the Council was the Planning Commission only. Ms. approving the resolution on Gust-Jenson said the Council machine calibration. Ms. Gust- should keep in mind the Board of Jenson said the City does not have Adjustment had expressed interest personnel for or access to machine in being included in this meeting. calibration testing and the City hires this work out. She said the Councilmember Hardman said resolution would allow the City to the problems being created could contract these services out. be because the board had newly elected members not familiar with Councilmember Pace asked if the issues at hand to make the the resolution for adoption of correct decisions at times. adjoining streets between the University of Utah and Salt Lake Councilmember Horrocks said City was nonthreatening. including the Board of Adjustment Councilmember Kirk said it was would be a courtesy. nonthreatening and it involved a Councilmember Pace said including small strip of the street. the Board of Adjustment would enable the Council to become Councilmember Kirk said the oriented with the board and to Wasatch Hollow Community Council place names with faces and would be coming to the Council including them would be a good Meeting tonight to advise the idea. Council on the Wasatch Community Park. She indicated they had been Ms. Gust-Jenson asked the advised to limit their comments to Council if they agreed to include three minutes. 90-117 PROCEINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITE, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1990 Councilmember Kirk indicated she would like to be excused from the Council Meeting at 7:30 as she had some personal business to attend to. Councilmember Hardman asked if there were any scheduled events the Council should be aware of. Ms. Shepherd, Council Staff Assistant, said she was currently trying to contact Ev Gray to discuss the details of the Downtown Business Alliance Luncheon in May so this could be included on the schedule of events. The meeting was adjourned at 5:25 p.m. 90-118 PROC DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI , UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Regular Session on Tuesday, April 10, 1990, at 6:00 p.m. in Room 315, City Council Chambers, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Don Hale Nancy Pace Mayor Palmer Depaulis, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Kathryn Marshall, City Recorder, and Beverly Jones, Deputy Recorder, were present. Council Chair Hardman presided at and Councilmember Kirk conducted the meeting. OPENING CEREMONIES COMMENTS #1. There was no invocation. #1. Peggy Scott, 1801 Logan Avenue, said she was the new #2. The Council led the Community Council Chair for the Pledge of Allegiance. Wasatch Hollow Community Association. She said the group's #3. Councilmember Godfrey main objective was to build a park moved and Councilmember Hale west of the Presbyterian Church on seconded to approve the minutes of 1700 South and 1700 East. She the Salt Lake City Council for the said there had been incredible regular meeting held Tuesday, support from the community for April 3, 1990, which motion this project. She said a design carried, all members voted aye, committee was currently working on except Councilmembers Hardman and a design for the park and the Horrocks, who were absent for the group was working with the Parks vote. Department. (M 90-1) Robert Adams, 1649 Downington #4. The Mayor and Council Avenue, said the committee was presented a resolution regarding excited about the park. He said Earth Week. the committee started this project one year ago and there was Councilmember Godfrey moved enthusiastic support from the and Councilmember Hale seconded to community. He said an area clean- adopt Resolution 41 of 1990, which up was planned for April 28th and motion carried, all members voted a garage sale on May 8th to help aye. fund this project. He said the group appreciated the support they Mayor DePaulis presented the had received from the Parks resolution to Lynn Olson. Department and the Mayor's Office. (R 90-1) He said he appreciated Councilmembers Kirk and Godfrey's support in attending the meetings and supporting the project. 90-119 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1990 Mr. Adams said he felt the in the University of Utah Research Community Council had convinced Park, with the City and the the neighborhood it was not solely University each paying part of the the City' s job to provide the cost. funds for this park. (C 90-173) #2 Bernice Cook, People' s NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS Freeway Community Council, said there were businesses in her #1. RE: An ordinance neighborhood that used the garbage amending Title 11, Chapter 12, cans distributed by Salt Lake City Section 020 of the Salt Lake City for the garbage collection Code, as amended, relating to program. She said she thought the disorderly conduct. cans were to be used by the residents, not private businesses. ACTION: Without objection, She was concerned whether the Councilmember Kirk referred the businesses had a business license. ordinance relating to disorderly She asked Mayor DePaulis where in conduct to the consent agenda. the City she could go to check on (0 90-14) these businesses. DISCUSSION: Councilmember Mayor DePaulis asked Ms. Cook Godfrey said the new language in to bring the addresses of the the ordinance reads "words which businesses to his office and his have a direct tendency to cause staff would investigate the acts of violence by the person to matter. whom the words are addressed. " He asked if there was an objective CONSENT AGENDA standard to decide which words had a tendency to cause acts of Councilmember Hardman moved violence. and Councilmember Godfrey seconded to approve the consent agenda, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, which motion carried, all members said a 1948 case stated that voted aye. "fighting words" had to be used or there may be a violation of First #1. RE: Adopt Resolution 42 Amendment rights. of 1990 authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation #2. RE: Set a date to hold Agreement between Salt Lake City a public hearing on June 5, 1990 Corporation and the Utah at 6:30 p.m. to receive public Department of Transportation comment and consider adopting an (UDOT), whereby UDOT will perform ordinance adding Section 12.72.070 certain calibrations of City to the Salt Lake City Code, 1988, machines, and testing of materials as amended, relating to public submitted by the City. parade regulations. (C 90-174) ACTION: Councilmember #2. RE: Adopt Resolution 43 Godfrey moved and Councilmember of 1990 authorizing the execution Hale seconded to set the hearing of an Interlocal Cooperation date for June 5, 1990, at 6:30 Agreement between Salt Lake City p.m. and refer to the Committee of Corporation and the University of the Whole, which motion carried, Utah for the connection by the all members voted aye. City of Wakara and Colorow Streets (0 90-16) 90-120 PROC INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI• UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1990 #3. RE: Adopt an ordinance changed and an amended Master Plan enacting Sections 12.56.302, was necessary. 12.56.303 and 12.56.304, and amending subparagraphs A. and B.1 He said the Planning of Section 12.56.550, Salt Lake Commission proposed the adoption City Code, relating to civil of an amended Master Plan instead penalties for unauthorized use of of removing the Restrictive high school parking lots. Covenant from the land. He said the amended plan was not as ACTION: Without objection detailed as the original plan and Councilmember Kirk referred the had to do with bulk and massing, ordinance relating to civil building materials, color, and penalties for unauthorized use of street scape design. high school parking lots to the Consent Agenda, which motion Mr. Dansie said the original carried, all members voted aye. Master Plan was detailed as to (0 90-15) specific uses such as housing and hotels. He said the arena would PUBLIC HEARING be appropriate on Block 79 directly south of the existing #1. A public hearing at 6:20 Triad Center. He said additional p.m. to receive public comment and office space had been allowed for consider adopting an ordinance on Block 84, where Triad was pursuant to Section 10-9-21, Utah located, and that Block 85 was Code Annotated, 1953 adopting the mostly owned by the LDS Church. amended "Triad Center Master Plan" for blocks 79, 84, and 85. He said the scale of many of the buildings along South Temple ACTION: Councilmember was monumental and those buildings Whitehead moved and Councilmember that are not gained monumentality Godfrey seconded to close the by the use of open space. Mr. public hearing, which motion Dansie said all of the buildings carried, all members voted aye. should maintain this scale. He said because of the major view Councilmember Whitehead corridor from the west towards moved and Councilmember Horrocks Temple Square, the Planning seconded to adopt Ordinance 21 of Commission determined it would be 1990, which motion carried, all inappropriate to build thirty- members present voted aye. five and forty story towers originally proposed in the Triad DISCUSSION: Doug Dansie, Center Master Plan. Planning Commission, said when the Triad Center was originally He said in order to reduce proposed, the Redevelopment Agency the massive appearance on block was involved in the land 79, it has been suggested the transactions. He said on May 14, walls of the Arena be constructed 1982, the City placed a mostly of glass. He said Block 85 Restrictive Covenant on the land would serve as an extension of the requiring any development to church campus, if the scale of the conform with the Master Plan. Mr. buildings are in line with the Dansie referred to a map existing LDS Church Genealogical illustrating the Master Plan Library and Art Museum. adopted by the City in 1982. He said economic conditions have 90-121 PROC DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE At, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1990 Mr. Dansie said in the He said on the original original Triad Master Plan, the Master Plan the two forty story colors and building materials were towers appeared to narrow the chosen to reflect what had been street and allowed only a view of used on the Union Pacific Depot. the center front portion of the He said the Planning Commission Union Pacific Depot. He said on decided the original Triad Master the north side any further office Plan did not need to be strictly development should maintain a adhered to, but any further setback to allow the view corridor development should be sensitive to of the depot to remain. the various colors and building materials. Mr. Dansie said a midblock pedestrian corridor had been Mr. Dansie said the included from Triad Center to Commission determined that the Temple Square through Block 85. arena should blend with the He said the Art Museum and the existing surroundings. He said Genealogical Library of the LDS the materials appropriate for the Church were constructed to Triad and the Arena Block could be facilitate a midblock walkway. He red brick, copper glass, clear said the Historical Landmarks glass, copper, unfinished Committee had been working on a concrete, sandstone, other native South Temple Master Plan for the stones and earth stone stucco. He street scape. said green tinted glass proposed by the Jazz Arena architect may be Mr. Dansie said the appropriate. He said materials Commission would like to see inappropriate for the arena block Indian Head Lighting, similar to were reflective silver or pastel the lights around Washington blue glass, white polished tile, Square, installed in the 300 to or paneling. 400 West block. He also said this summer a special improvement He said because Block 85 is district was planned for this area an extension of the LDS Church and red brick with concrete campus, materials appropriate highlights would be used as a could include granite stone brick paving pattern for the sidewalk on stucco or clear glass. The only South Temple. He said this was materials that would be consistent with what Triad had inappropriate for this block would already done. be silver or pastel reflective curtain walls. Mr. Dansie said that trees should be planted on all parking He said in the original Triad strips for formality of the Master Plan there had been a streets, and that center medians considerable amount of open space. would be appropriate on 300 West. In the amended plan it is critical that open space be allowed at the He said the original Triad corners of 300 West, 400 West and Master Plan called for two sky South Temple because they bridges over 300 West. He said highlight the Union Pacific Depot. the Commission concluded that one He said there should be a setback sky bridge from Broadcast House to along South Temple between 300 Block 85 would be appropriate. He and 400 West. said overhead sky bridges would be inappropriate on South Temple. 90-122 PROC DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1990 Councilmember Godfrey said two years ago there had been a request for a sky bridge across 300 West. He asked if at that time the sky bridge was turned down due to financing. Alan Johnson, Planning Director, said at that time there had been a question of security. He said a sky bridge could go from building to building and be fairly secure, but when it goes from sidewalk to building, it can not be secured. He said he did not know why the sky bridge was not built at that time. (W 90-3) The meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. COUNC CHAIR C T ORDER 90-123 oa)7/2/6 7 2 romi SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL rI�AU AGENDAL� - t�- ' L 1 L CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER {) (MI ' ROOM 315 1 J �� I ��` CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING \\ 451 SOUTH STATE STREET j� Tuesday, April 10, 1990 C /'-"VU 1�� �U 43 6:00 .m. I `/ ..s/70,,P/,‘&4674, A. BRIEFING SESSION: 5:00 - 5:55 p.m. , Room 325 City and County Building, 451 South State 1. Report of the Executive Director. B. OPENING CEREMONIES: 1 . Invocation. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Approval of the minutes. 4. The City Council and Mayor will pres nt a resolution regardin Earth Week. tc)t W t() A(6 4, _ �`JL(� co(-y u'{'S, C. COMMENTS: 1 . Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2. Citizen Comments to the Council. D. CONSENT: 1 . Resolution: City Machine Calibration and Materials Testing Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) , whereby UDOT will perform certain calibrations of City machines, and testing of materials submitted by the City. (C 90-174) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 2. Resolution: Connecting Streets Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City \, ` Corporation and the ,University of Utah for the connection by the t ) l C City of Wakara a� r Coloow Streets in the University of Utah <6) Research Park, wi^th- .hE City and the University each paying part of the cost. (C 90-173) Staff recommendation: Adopt. E. NEW BUSINESS: 1 . Ordinance: Disorderly Conduct Consider adopting an ordinance amending Title 11 , Chapter 12, Section 020 of thealt Lake City Code, as amended') relating to disorderly conduct.(0 90-14) Staff recommendation: Refer to consent. 2. Ordinance: Public Parade Regulations Set date to hold a public hearing on June 5, 1990 at 6:30 p.m. to receive public comment and consider adopting an_ordinance adding Section 12.72.070 to the palt Lake City Code, 1988) as amend, relating to public parade gii-li-ats. (0 90-16) Lam= Staff recommendation: Set date and refer to Committee of the Whole. 3. Ordinance: High School Parking Lots Consider adopting an ordinance enacting Sections 12.56.302, 12.56.303 and 12.56.30 e}-aten ubparagraphs A. and B. 1 . of Section 12.56.550, Salt Lake City Code, \ elating to civil penalties for unaut s-of`-highcchool parking lots. (0 90-15) Staff recommendation: Refer to consent. F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: G. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 6:20 p.m. UCC4 1 . Restrictive Covenants/Jazz Arena Receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance pursuant to Section 10-9-21, Utah Code Annotated, 1953)dopting the amended "Triad Center Master " -d-locks 79,-814'and 85. (W 90-3) Staff recommendation: Close hearing and adopt. H. ADJOURNMENT. ** FINAL ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AND/OR ORDINANCES ADOPTED CONCERNING ANY ITEM ON THIS AGENDA. DATED: April 6, 1990 BY: CITY RECORDER C� STATE OF UTAH ) COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ss. On the 6th day of April , 1990 I personally delivered a copy of the foregoing notice to the Mayor and City Council and posted copies of the same in conspicuous view, at the following times and locations within the City and County Building, 451 South State Street , Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. At 5:00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office, Room 415; and 2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom, Room 343. ITY ORDER Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6th day of April, 1990. ` otary Public residin e State of Utah 'N„,..„ My Commission Expires: i �� B,(18,IhR�►FWGHI �'� 451 so.ewe st.Rm 415 I • ''" Slalltt tetra Clq► Utah 641°2 I AEPRb1A ., (1, EXECUIV/DIRECTO PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of the Whole on Tuesday, April 3, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. in Room 325, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Wayne Horrocks Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Nancy Pace Tom Godfrey Don Hale Councilmember Whitehead was absent. Council Chair Hardman presided at the meeting. Council Chair Alan Hardman Wednesday with a reception follow- opened the meeting. ing. The Council interviewed Tim In reviewing the meeting Chambless prior to consideration agenda for the evening, she indi- of his appointment to the Board of cated most of the items were Adjustment. He indicated he had consent. Councilmember Hardman been a Salt Lake City resident for inquired if there were any re- twenty years, and had taught quests to pull any of the consent government and served as a re- items. There were no requests. search assistant to Mayor Wilson. He expressed his interest in Ms. Gust-Jenson indicated serving on the board as a citizen that Jim McGuire, Lee King and and active member of the communi- Roger Cutler would be available ty. He said he was aware of the for questions regarding Item F-1. time commitment. Councilmembers asked to receive a briefing during the meeting on Cindy Gust-Jenson, Council this item. Executive Director, said that Councilmembers should have re- Regarding F-3, Ms. Gust- ceived their travel information Jenson noted the motion for this and expense checks for the confer- included a clause for a five-day ence in St. George. She re- waiting period which was required quested the Council ' s approval to for annexations. post an agenda stating they would be attending the conference. Regarding F-4, the bonds for Previously press releases were the Steiner Aquatic Center, Ms. issued, but this practice was Gust-Jenson indicated motions had discontinued when a burglary been included in the packets since occurred to a Councilmember' s action was required by both the home while they were away at a Municipal Building Authority and conference. The Council agreed to the Council. Buzz Hunt, Cheryl post an agenda as was routinely Cook and Dick King were present to done for other meetings, but not provide further information re- issue any press releases. garding the financing for this project. Ms. Gust-Jenson said the agenda for the NAHRO conference Mr. Hunt said changes had would be available upon arrival in been made since an overall savings St. George, and the first meeting would be realized by the City. was scheduled for 5:00 p.m. on Dick King reviewed the details of 90-102 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 the transaction for the Council. Mr. Hunt said the amount for the bonds was enough for the City to seek a rating and they had re- ceived a triple A level. Ms. Cook said these bonds were combined with the City' s overall debt and this was the final step in the financing for the project. With the changes in the amount for the bonds, Ms. Gust-Jenson said the Council would need to strike the word "approximately" and read the correct amount of $1, 825, 000 for the record. Ms. Gust-Jenson explained the memo distributed regarding the concerns from the citizens on the Senior Golf Committee. She said they might be present this evening and their concerns had been ex- plained to her, which in turn were itemized in her memo to the Coun- cil. She suggested that the Council could adopt the ordinance regarding the group golf reserva- tions, and then request an updated report from the Administration at the first of the year as to how the program was working. It was noted that Councilmember Kirk would conduct the meeting and would read the resolution regarding the Steiner Aquatic Center. The briefing session ad- journed. 90-103 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Regular Session on Tuesday, April 3, 1990, at 6:00 p.m. in Room 315, City Council Chambers, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Wayne Horrocks Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Nancy Pace Tom Godfrey Don Hale Councilmember Whitehead was absent. Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Lynda Domino, Chief Deputy City Recorder, and S.R. Kivett, Deputy Recorder, were present. Council Chair Hardman presided at the meeting and Councilmember Kirk conducted the meeting. OPENING CEREMONIES recipients of the awards and honored Wanda McDonough as the #1. Police Chaplain Robert Reading Is FUNdamental worker of Schrank gave the invocation. the year. He said she had been involved in the program for over #2. The Council led the 15 years and had touched the lives Pledge of Allegiance. of thousands of children. He said she had donated countless hours to #3. Councilmember Godfrey the city library and the Friends moved and Councilmember Horrocks of the RIF program. seconded to approve the minutes of the Salt Lake City Council for the #5. The Mayor and Council regular meeting held Tuesday, presented a resolution of recogni- March 20, 1990, which motion tion to Kimball Young, Betsy Hunt, carried, all members present voted Steve Lowe and Maryanne Webster aye. for their efforts in conjunction (M 90-1) with the establishment of the Steiner Aquatic Center. #4. The Mayor and Council presented awards to students for Councilmember Kirk said the the Reading Is FUNdamental "Cele- Steiner Aquatic Center was a bration of Reading" contest. model project of a public and private partnership. She said the Mayor DePaulis and Council land for the center had been given Chair Hardman presented the to the city by the federal govern- awards. The Mayor said they had ment, and the money had been made these presentations for contributed by the Salt Lake City several years and enjoyed support- School District, Salt Lake City ing this important effort. They Corporation, and private dona- presented the awards to Andrea tions. Councilmember Kirk read Bailey, Edison Elementary, Amanda the resolution. Oviatt, Jackson Elementary, Jamie Osborne, Franklin Elementary, and Councilmember Godfrey moved Roy Blair, Guadalupe Elementary. and Councilmember Hardman seconded to adopt Resolution 38 of 1990, The Mayor congratulated the which motion carried, all members 90-104 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 present voted aye. tion of an east-west alley between "K" and "L" Streets, and llth and Councilmember Kirk and Mayor 12th Avenues, pursuant to Petition DePaulis presented the awards to #400-764-89 . those individuals who were hon- (P 90-85) ored. (R 90-1) #5. RE: Setting a date to hold a public hearing on May 8, CONSENT AGENDA 1990, at 6:30 p.m. to receive public comment and consider adopt- Councilmember Godfrey moved ing an ordinance adding Section and Councilmember Hale seconded 21. 10.090, providing for waiver of to approve the consent agenda, fees for alley vacations in resi- which motion carried, all members dential districts. present voted aye. (P 90-86) #1. RE: Setting a date to #6. RE: Setting a date to hold a public hearing on April 17, hold a public hearing on May 8, 1990, at 6:20 p.m. , to receive 1990, at 6:40 p.m. to receive public comment and consider adopt- public comment and consider adopt- ing an ordinance amending Title 9 ing an ordinance amending Section of the Salt Lake City Code relat- 21.76.080 of the Salt Lake City ing to health and safety, by Code, relating to airport zoning adding Chapter 9.48 dealing with and height regulations. cost recovery for negligently (0 90-5) caused fires. (0 89-14) #7. RE: Adopting Resolution 30 of 1990 authorizing the execu- #2. RE: Setting a date to tion of an interlocal cooperation hold a public hearing on April 17, agreement between Salt Lake City 1990, at 6:30 p.m. to receive Corporation and Utah State Univer- public comment and consider adopt- sity providing for laboratory ing an ordinance amending Title 9 services for the City's Depart- of the Salt Lake City Code relat- ment of Public Utilities. ing to health and safety, by (C 90-151) adding Chapter 9.44 dealing with cost recovery for hazardous mater- #8. RE: Adopting Resolution ials emergencies. 31 of 1990 authorizing the execu- (0 89-40) tion of amendment No. 3 to an interlocal cooperation agreement #3. RE: Adopting Ordinance between Salt Lake City Corporation 16 of 1990 amending Section 14.- and the University of Utah Founda- 12.080, Salt Lake City Code, to tion to add monitoring the irriga- eliminate the requirement of bonds tion quality of the Jordan River or insurance on encroachments for from April through September 30, fences or landscaping improve- 1990. ments. (C 87-75) (0 90-9) #9. RE: Adopting Resolution #4. RE: Setting a date to 32 of 1990 authorizing the execu- hold a public hearing on May 8, tion of an interlocal cooperation 1990, at 6:20 p.m. to receive agreement between Salt Lake City public comment and consider adopt- Corporation and Salt Lake County ing an ordinance vacating a por- allowing for reimbursement of 90-105 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 expenses incurred by the County to reappointment of Afton Kyriopoulos move a City water main to allow to the Housing Advisory and Ap- for County road improvements. peals Board. (C 90-152) (I 90-6) #10. RE: Adopting Resolution #17. RE: Approving the 33 of 1990 authorizing the execu- reappointment of Kathy Scheaffer tion of an interlocal cooperation to the Housing Advisory and Ap- agreement between Salt Lake City peals Board. Corporation and the State of Utah, (I 90-6) Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation #18. RE: Approving the allowing certain City property reappointment of Maj-Greth Holm- along the Jordan River Parkway to berg to the Housing Advisory and be used for jogging, walking and Appeals Board. bicycling. (I 90-6) (C 90-153) #19. RE: Approving the #11. RE: Adopting Resolution reappointment of Byron Haslam to 34 of 1990 authorizing the execu- the Mosquito Abatement District. tion of an interlocal cooperation (I 90-8) agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Utah Depart- #20. RE: Approving the ment of Transportation for the reappointment of Jim Webb to the rental of City equipment and Mosquito Abatement District. equipment operator services for (I 90-8) the purpose of planing road as- phalt for road and street improve- #21. RE: Approving the ments. reappointment of John Wennergren (C 90-155) to the Tracy Aviary Board. (I 90-14) #12. RE: Approving the appointment of Timothy Chambless NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS to the Board of Adjustment. ( I 90-3) #1. RE: A resolution autho- rizing the execution of an #13. RE: Approving the interlocal cooperation agreement reappointment of Patrick Shea to between Salt Lake City and the the Airport Authority Board. U.S. Department of Housing and (I 90-11) Urban Development (HUD) for a special projects grant to combat #14. RE: Approving the drug use among young people resid- reappointment of John Williams to ing in public housing. the Central Business Improvement District. ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey (I 90-12) moved and Councilmember Horrocks seconded to suspend the rules and #15. RE: Approving the on first reading adopt Resolution reappointment of William Cutting 35 of 1990, which motion carried, to the Central Business Improve- all members present voted aye. ment District. (C 90-154) (I 90-12) #16. RE: Approving the 90-106 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 UNFINISHED COUNCIL BUSINESS balance was approximately $679, 000 and it would not reach $900, 000 #1. RE: A resolution until September of 1990. He said committing Urban Development Clark asked the Council to take Action Grant repayment funds to an action so they could secure their economic development project financing and proceed with the (Clark Financial Corporation loan project. application) . In regards to this project, ACTION: Councilmember Hale he said staff considered the moved and Councilmember Hardman national objectives and whether or seconded to adopt Resolution 39 of not the project was within those 1990 committing UDAG repayment parameters. He outlined the funds to the Shopko project with objectives which were: 1 ) if the condition four revised as follows: project would benefit low and "No loan funds will be provided moderate income people, 2 ) if it until and unless all delinquent would address slums or blight, or property taxes due on the Shopko 3) if it met an urgent community project area have been paid in development need. He said staff full. " considered the urgent community need and applied criteria used by Councilmember Pace made a HUD to process a UDAG loan. substitute motion, seconded by Councilmember Godfrey, to change He said they determined a condition number four to read: public benefit and need, and "No loan funds will be provided whether or not the loan was appro- until and unless all delinquent priate. He said they considered property taxes due on the Parkview the number and type of jobs creat- Plaza have been paid in full by ed or retained, other development June 30, 1991, " which motion which would be stimulated in the failed, Councilmembers Horrocks, area, an increase to the tax base Hardman, Hale, and Kirk voted nay including property, sales and/or and Councilmembers Pace and income tax, and if there was an Godfrey voted aye. increase in needed services. Based on these four criteria, he The Council then voted on said staff recommended that the Councilmember Hale's motion, which city enter into the agreement and carried, all members present voted loan Clark Financial $900, 000. aye except Councilmembers Pace and He referred to an attachment which Godfrey who voted nay. outlined the loan and repayment schedule along with four condi- DISCUSSION: Lee King, Commu- tions. nity and Economic Development, said Council action on this issue He said the funds for this would decide whether or not the project would come from five city would loan Clark Financial sources: A construction loan from $900, 000 in UDAG funds to con- First Security Bank, Salt Lake struct the Sugar House Shopko City' s revolving loan, an RDA tax project. He said the Council increment loan, sale of land to first took action on August 1, Shopko, and a Shopko contribution 1989, when they passed a legisla- to site costs. He said this tive intent to loan Clark Finan- totaled $16, 915, 000 and staff cial the $900, 000 from UDAG re- recommended loan approval with the volving loan funds. He said fund four conditions specified in 90-107 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 Attachment A to the resolution. be disbursed by mid 1991 . Mr. King said according to another condi- Councilmember Godfrey asked tion of the loan, the $900, 000 Mr. King to explain condition four would not be disbursed until the regarding payment of delinquent loan from First Security had been property taxes due on Parkview drawn down. Plaza. Mr. King said the Parkview Plaza was a previous UDAG loan Councilmember Kirk asked agreement in the Sugar House area Steve Lowe, Clark Financial if he and at this time they were three was aware of the problem with the years behind on their property tax increment money. Mr. Lowe said taxes, which totaled about $453, - he understood that the increment 000. He said staff recommended projected was on the Shopko this condition as a mechanism to development and not the Parkview get the taxes paid. Plaza, so Shopko would not be affected. He also said the legal Councilmember Godfrey asked entities for the Shopko project why they would attach this condi- and the Parkview Plaza were dif- tion to an unrelated project. Mr. ferent. King said both projects were owned by Clark Financial. Councilmember Hale said some Councilmember Godfrey asked if the of the same partners were involved city was guaranteed the tax money with Shopko as Parkview Plaza and in the event the Parkview Plaza both pieces of property owed back was sold. Mr. King said the taxes taxes. He said taxes due on the would be paid if the project went Shopko property were $380, 000 into default but the question was which would be paid in full by May whether or not the city wanted to of 1990. He said he didn't see a wait five years. connection between the $450, 000 in taxes due on Parkview and the Councilmember Pace said she Shopko project. He said he didn' t was not opposed to the development want to jeopardize the Shopko but was concerned that if taxes project by making them responsible were not paid the city didn' t get for the taxes due on Parkview. He its tax increment and had to said Shopko was important to Sugar forego the use of the tax money. House and the benefits of the She said the longer it took them project outweighed the risks. to pay the more it cost the city in terms of tax money being un- He said the estimated number available. of full-time jobs which would be created was 175, with 275 part- Councilmember Kirk asked if time jobs. He said the estimated the RDA would be able to follow increase in gross sales would be through on the tax increment if $54, 000,000 a year and annual the taxes were not paid. Mr. King sales tax revenue to Salt Lake said that was what he understood City would be $164,000. He said after talking to Dick Turpin of business license fees would gener- the RDA. He said the tax incre- ate $10, 000 of revenue for the ment money was not available city. He also said this project because the taxes had not been would be a catalyst for further paid. development and he knew of inter- ested high-volume tenants. He Councilmember Pace said staff said this project could attract projected that the $900, 000 would new businesses such as Toys R Us 90-108 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 and a 10-screen movie theatre. Councilmember Pace said this was a matter of principle and Councilmember Godfrey said he precedent regarding "bailing out" preferred that the taxes on Park- developers. Councilmember Hale view Plaza be paid as a condition said he considered this a means to of the loan. In regards to Clark improve the Sugar House area. Financial ' s original UDAG, he said they had indicated that as a Roger Cutler, city attorney, justification for the loan the said the county collected the Parkview Plaza would generate city' s property taxes as a trustee property taxes. He said if public and the city was entitled to money was loaned then it should be interest on their portion of the returned and the taxes paid. He taxes. agreed that the Shopko project would be an asset to the area but Councilmember Kirk said if he said people had to pay their the city could increase the tax property taxes. base in Sugar House this would raise a tremendous amount of He said if there was diffi- money. She said she thought there culty with the Shopko project and was a slight risk but said this something went wrong, the question request was worth supporting. would arise as to why the Council loaned money to people who had not Councilmember Horrocks asked paid their property taxes. He what the impact would be if the said if the city was going to lend taxes on Parkview Plaza had to be public money, they should have the paid by June 30, 1991. Mr. Lowe expectation that people would pay said this would have the same their property taxes. impact as the staff' s original condition since UDAG funds would In regards to Parkview Plaza, not be disbursed until 1991 . He Councilmember Hale said he didn't said they had not paid taxes but think the city was at risk since they had made the UDAG payments the taxes had to be paid by 1992. and paid the bond indebtedness. He also said Clark Financial had He said they had created a project $2,000, 000 equity in the plaza so of value which secured the UDAG he didn' t think the company or the and the taxes, and the taxes bank would let the project fall to would have to be paid through the a tax sale. established enforcement mechanism. Councilmember Godfrey said he Mr. Cutler said taxes were was concerned about the timeliness assessed and became due and pay- of the city receiving the taxes. able on November 30. For sake of He said the city had been without clarification, he said he inter- the money for five years and preted Councilmember Hale' s motion wouldn't receive any interest. to mean that the taxes past due and payable would be paid, but not Councilmember Hale said with taxes that had been assessed and Shopko coming into the Sugar House were not yet due and payable. area, there had been increased (C 90-156) interest in leasing space in the Parkview Plaza. He said revital- #2. RE: An ordinance amend- ization had increased interest in ing Section 2.04. 055A of the Salt the area. Lake City Code, relating to board appointments -- terms in office. 90-109 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 ACTION: Councilmember Pace establish uniformity between the moved and Councilmember Horrocks boards as to the number of years seconded to adopt Ordinance 17 of constituting a term. 1990. Mr. Cutler said the language Councilmember Hardman moved in the ordinance was designed to and Councilmember Horrocks second- address those who had served ed to amend the motion by striking partial terms. He said those the phrase, " . . .or eight years, people could serve two terms or whichever is greater. . . " . This eight years. Councilmember motion was withdrawn. Hardman said he didn' t want the language to be a subterfuge for The Council then voted on people to serve longer than two Councilmember Pace' s motion, which terms. Mr. Cutler said a person carried, all members present voted could not serve additional terms aye except Councilmember Godfrey if the appointment would extend who voted nay. beyond eight years. He reminded the Council that they didn' t have DISCUSSION: Councilmember to ratify any appointment. Hardman referred to the ordinance and said he was concerned about Councilmember Godfrey said the phrase, " . . .or eight years, when the Council previously con- whichever is greater. . . " He said sidered this issue, they concluded there was no uniformity between that eight years should be the boards as to the number of years maximum. He said the emphasis was which constituted a term. Using on eight years and not the number the Landmarks Committee as an of terms. example, which has three-year (0 90-13) terms, he asked Roger Cutler, city attorney, if people could serve #3. RE: An ordinance three full terms, which would be recognizing the adoption of amend- nine years, or if after eight ment 14-B to the Master Annexation years they would have to step Policy Declarations; extending the down. limits of Salt Lake City to in- clude the Carrigan View Phase 1 Mr. Cutler said a person Annexation, zoning the same resi- could serve full consecutive terms dential "R-1" with Foothill Devel- but could not serve longer than opment "F-1" overlay zone, by eight years. He said this ordi- amending the use district map as nance was a self-policing power adopted by Section 21 . 14.020 of for the Council and they could the Salt Lake City Code; amending choose to not confirm an appoint- Salt Lake City Council District ment recommended by the Mayor. He and School Precinct Boundary maps, said this would not purport the and specifying conditions prece- Mayor' s power to make a recommen- dent to said annexation. dation for appointment. ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey Councilmember Hardman said he moved and Councilmember Horrocks thought even though the Council seconded to adopt Ordinance 20 of limited appointments to two terms, 1990 and authorize signing pend- they still had flexibility to ing a five-day waiting period, appoint people beyond that based which motion carried, all members on extraordinary circumstances. present voted aye. He suggested that the city should (P 90-45) 90-110 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 #4. RE: A resolution of the ed to adjourn as the Board of Board of Trustees of the Municipal Trustees of the Municipal Building Building Authority of Salt Lake Authority of Salt Lake City, which City, authorizing the issuance and motion carried, all members sale of lease revenue bonds (Stei- present voted aye. ner Aquatic Center Project), Series 1990A, in the aggregate Councilmember Godfrey moved principal amount of $1, 825,000 to and Councilmember Hale seconded to be dated as of April 1, 1990; reconvene as the Salt Lake City authorizing the execution and Council, which motion carried, delivery of a second supplemental all members present voted aye. indenture of trust, a second (Q 90-3) amendment to master lease agree- ment, a Steiner Aquatic Center #5. RE: A resolution of the ground lease, a construction Municipal Council of Salt Lake agency agreement, a collateral City, approving the issuance by assignment agreement, a tax cer- the Municipal Building Authority tificate and other agreements and of Salt Lake City, of lease reve- documents required in connection nue bonds (Steiner Aquatic Center therewith; ratifying the contribu- Project) , Series 1990A, in the tion of a preliminary official aggregate principal amount of statement relating to such bonds . $1, 825,000 to be dated as of April and authorizing the preparation 1, 1990 and approving the terms of and distribution of a final offi- said bonds; authorizing the execu- cial statement relating to such tion and delivery of a second bonds; approving the sale of such amendment to master lease agree- bonds; and authorizing the taking ment, a Steiner Aquatic Center of all other actions necessary to ground lease, a construction the consummation of the transac- agency agreement, a collateral tions contemplated by such resolu- assignment agreement, a tax cer- tion. tificate, a bond purchase agree- ment and other agreements and ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey documents required in connection moved and Councilmember Hale therewith; approving the form, seconded to recess as the City terms and provisions of a second Council, which motion carried, all supplemental indenture of trust; members present voted aye. and authorizing the taking of all other actions necessary to the Councilmember Godfrey moved consummation of the transactions and Councilmember Hale seconded to contemplated by such resolution. convene as the Board of Trustees of the Municipal Building Authori- ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey ty of Salt Lake City, which motion moved and Councilmember Hale carried, all members present voted seconded to adopt Resolution 37 of aye. 1990, which motion carried, all members present voted aye. Councilmember Godfrey moved (Q 90-3) and Councilmember Pace seconded to adopt Resolution 36 of 1990, which PUBLIC HEARINGS motion carried, all members present voted aye. #1. RE: A public hearing at 6: 20 p.m. to receive comments and Councilmember Godfrey moved consider adopting an ordinance and Councilmember Horrocks second- approving the Northwest Community 90-111 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 Master Plan Update. use conflicts between residential and industrial uses. ACTION: Councilmember Hale moved and Councilmember Horrocks The third area encompassed seconded to close the public unincorporated land and the area hearing, which motion carried, all north and east of the airport. members present voted aye. She said this plan should address coordinated land use policies for Councilmember Hale moved and agricultural and residential Councilmember Godfrey seconded preservation, as well as aero- adopt Ordinance 18 of 1990, which space, aviation, commercial, and motion carried, all members industrial uses. She said the present voted aye. plan should provide a comprehen- sive analysis to establish the DISCUSSION: Janice Jardine, development capacity of the area Planning and Zoning staff, out- and should also provide strate- lined the area on a map. She said gies for the development of public this plan would update the 1980 infrastructure and circulation Northwest Community Master Plan systems. She said the plan should and would provide additional consider mitigation measures for information. She said there was environmental constraints in the a boundary adjustment in the area such as the high water table, Northwest Community and the east- wet lands preservation, and soil ern boundary would now be I-15. conditions. She said the update estab- She said the three community lished criteria to be used as a councils in this area, North guideline in considering commer- Redwood, Northwest, and Rose Park, cial rezoning requests, and it supported the adoption of the established urban design guide- update. She said the Planning lines for residential and commer- Commission recommended adoption. cial developments. She said it established parameters to be used Councilmember Horrocks re- when considering revitalization of ferred to the commercial strip on existing commercial areas. North Temple and asked how far west it extended. Ms. Jardine She said the plan identified said it would probably extend to three areas for small area master the western boundary of the air- plans. The first area was the port. She said beyond that bound- North Temple corridor which func- ary the area became the Northwest tioned as a gateway into the city Quadrant. She said this corridor as well as a commercial strip. needed a comprehensive master plan She said the small area plan in order to coordinate the zoning should identify guidelines which and land uses, and provide a would provide for coordinated coordinated development policy. development. She said the Northwest Community was actually divided along North The second area was north of Temple but because this was the the Rose Park Golf Course. The North Temple commercial corridor, plan should examine and provide the small area plan would include mitigation procedures for environ- both the north and south sides of mental issues such as flooding and North Temple. soil suitability. She said it should also address possible land No one from the audience 90-112 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 addressed this issue. to approve the change. She said (T 90-5) next year would be the school' s centennial and the senior class #2. RE: A public hearing at was presenting the honorary name 6:30 p.m. to receive comment and signs as their gift. consider adopting a resolution approving the honorary name of No one from the audience "Panther Way" for 300 North be- opposed this petition. tween 200 West and 400 West, (P 90-66) pursuant to Petition #400-782. #3. RE: A public hearing at ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey 6:40 p.m. to receive comment and moved and Councilmember Hardman consider adopting an ordinance seconded to close the public amending section 15. 16.035A of the hearing, which motion carried, all Salt Lake City Code, relating to members present voted aye. group reservations at City golf courses. Councilmember Hale moved and Councilmember Godfrey seconded to ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey adopt Resolution 40 of 1990, which moved and Councilmember Pace motion carried, all members seconded to close the public present voted aye. hearing, which motion carried, all members present voted aye. DISCUSSION: Janice Jardine, Planning and Zoning staff, said Councilmember Godfrey moved this was a request from the stu- and Councilmember Horrocks second- dents of West High. She said ed to adopt Ordinance 19 of 1990, honorary name changes did not which motion carried, all members legally change the street name and present voted aye. the signs were installed below the legal street sign. She said the DISCUSSION: John Gust, students were advised that the Director of Parks, explained that cost for the signs would be they were under constant pressure $110.00 and they were also in- for tournaments so they wanted to formed that if the signs were have one Saturday and one or two removed the students would have to Sundays per month to allow reser- pay for new signs. She said the vations for tournaments. He said city previously granted honorary a minimum of 5 and a maximum of name changes for Judge Memorial 20 tee times could be used. He High and Highland High. She said the cost for 9 holes would be recommended approval of the reso- a $1 .00 fee increase and a $2.00 lution. increase for 18 holes. He also said the players would be required Councilmember Pace asked who to use carts if available. He was technically liable if the said during the week each course signs were stolen. Ms. Jardine could schedule two tournaments said the city would not prosecute after 11 :00 a.m. , following the anyone and the school would have same criteria as weekends. to replace the signs. He said they anticipated Kirsten Clawson, petitioner, additional revenue of $51,000 if said the senior class, administra- all the tournament times were tors, and alumni supported this booked. He said this revenue did request and she asked the Council not include golf carts or golf 90-113 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 balls. He said the golf courses 6. He asked hypothetically had preliminary reservations and what would happen if 20 people most of the weekends were already booked the time and 5 didn' t show. booked. He said the ordinance Mr. Gust said since they would would not apply to men' s or wo- have paid in advance, they would- men' s associations; it would only n't get a refund unless the tour- pertain to tournament golf. nament members could fill the 5 vacant positions. He said they had operated a successful golf program and he 7. He asked if this ordi- didn' t want to affect usual play nance would apply to the men' s by tying up the courses too much association, women' s association with tournament play. He said and UGA tournaments. Mr. Gust this year they wanted to monitor said it would not apply. the program to determine its effectiveness and then make modi- 8. He referred to the open fications if necessary. scheduling for tournaments after August 31 and asked for clarifica- Lou Skokos, P.O. Box 1535, tion. Mr. Gust said after August asked several questions: 31 there would be no restrictions on the use of the courses for 1 . He asked if they would tournaments. He said golfers use a centralized phone system for would still be required to use reservations. Mr. Gust said they golf carts. were not addressing the phone system in this ordinance. 9. He asked if after August 31, tournament play would still 2 . He asked about refunds on begin after 11:00 a.m. Mr. Gust cancellations. Mr. Gust said said the time would probably move refunds would be given if the up one hour since they would be time was booked with another entering the shorter season, tournament. If the time was rained although at this point he said he out, the money would be refunded. wasn' t really sure. 3. He asked who would be Councilmember Hardman asked affected by the ordinance. Mr. if there was a market for tourna- Gust reiterated that the ordinance ments and Mr. Gust said there was. would apply to people who wanted to book a tee time months in Councilmember Hardman asked advance for a tournament. how the Council could make sure the policy didn't change substan- 4. He asked about the use of tially from the copy given to golf carts and Mr. Gust said if them. Cindy Gust-Jenson, Council carts were available, tournament Executive Director, said the players would be required to use Council had the policy for infor- them otherwise they wouldn't get mational purposes but this was the reservation. an administrative issue. 5. He asked if the purpose Councilmember Hardman wanted of this ordinance was to generate assurance that the policy wouldn' t the $51,000 in lost revenue from change substantially without the passes. Mr. Gust said the ordi- Council ' s knowledge. Mr. Gust nance was a response to the mar- said the Council had his assurance ket. and he wanted to come back before 90-114 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1990 them in the fall with a report. He reiterated that he didn't want this to be detrimental to usual play. Councilmember Hardman said he wanted to be informed of any substantive changes in the policy. (0 90-11) The meeting adjourned at 7: 55 p.m. COUNCIL CHAIR CITY RECORDER 90-115 TS is SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION ' A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF g . SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH WHEREAS, twenty years ago, millions of Americans gathered together on a day designated as Earth Day, to demonstrate their concern over the quality :;t..-.• .. • ' r' < li and future of all life on our planet; and ' WHEREAS, despite significant environmental improvements in the intervening years, the planet still faces severe environmental crises such as global warming, deforestation, air and water pollution, and a rapidly increasing j : . population; and ' = - WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 is a call to all the citizens of the world to join in a • global effort to save the planet; and WHEREAS, the solution to these common, global problems will require sustained, local action; and WHEREAS, Earth Day Utah 1990 activities in Salt Lake City will educate citizens on i the importance of acting in an environmentally responsible fashion, by - conserving energy and water, by supporting efforts to improve air quality, using efficient transportation, promoting local tree-planting efforts, and , - I by participating in recycling activities; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council and Mayor of Salt Lake City, that = `'_ _;''' F:"' we do hereby proclaim the week of April 14th through April 22nd, 1990, as { ,. : "Earth Week" in Salt Lake City. • i Dated this 10th dayof April, 1990. E �~ CI (�' Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor Alan G. Hardman, Chair of ``=.. s. = 3 Ronald J. Whitehead L. Wayne Horrocks I * , ' Nancy K. Pace - - _4,4.��k~ 'Iom Godfrey r t"" 3-':t .:.. t x,. Roselyn N. Kirk r . SALT PAW,'GZ PY(GO'RP@ ION1 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JOSEPH R• ANDERSON 324 SOUTH STATE STREET PALMER DEFAULTS PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 MAYOR 535-7775 TO : SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL DATE : MARCH 16 , 1990 REFERENCE : Interlocal agreement between Utah Department of Transportation and Salt Lake City Corporation for performance of various material test . RECOMMENDATION ; That the City Council adopt a resolution granting approval for the Mayor to sign the agreement in behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation . AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS ; The $5 , 500 . 00 to cover the cost of this work is in the City Engineer's operating budget line item . Account No . 03- 12900- 2329 . DISCUSSION The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize the Utah Department of Transportation , Research of Materials Division to perform various bituminous materials tests . These are tests such as viscosity , ductility , bituminous additive , and immersion compression which the City does not have the equipment to perform . These are tests that are essential to ensure the bituminous material complies with City specifications . The Research & Materials Division also calibrates , as necessary , the concrete compression machine , Marshall Stability Machine and CBR Press that arew in the City's Materials Lab . All the work to be performed by UDOT is only performed upon prior written request from the City . The period of the agreement is from July 1 , 1990 to June 30 , 1991 . SUBMITTED BY : JOSEPH R . ANDERSON , PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR A JRS : JH : po RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, Title 11 Chapter 13, U.C.A. , 1953 as amended allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1 . That it does hereby approve the attached agreement generally described as follows : An Agreement whereby UDOT will perform certain calibrations of City machines, and tests of materials submitted by the City. 2 . Palmer A. DePaulis , Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City this day of , 1990 . SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER RLM:cc DF6 11 01 40 4/80 Reco rde r STATE OF UTAH PROFESSIONAL CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT This Agreement entered into this day of , June 19 90 between the Department of Transportation Research & Materials Department Division and SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION (DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS) Name "Social Security No./ 444 SOUTH STATE STREET Federal ID No. Address SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 City State Zip Code is for the purpose of providing temporary (less than one fiscal year) professional services as described below: Calibrate concrete compression machine, marshall stability machine and CBR press . Perform various bituminous material tests as requested, i .e. , viscosity, ductility, bituminous additive, immersion compression. Perform various materials tests as requested.Such work shall be performed only upon prior written request from the City. Services are to begin July 1, 1990 and will terminate June 30, 1991 The total amount for the services as outlined above shall not exceed $ Payments shall include: Personal Service hours X hourly rate = Travel miles X rate = Other (Description) Amount = Amount = Amount = TOTAL = $5,500.00 DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL PROGRAM DIRECTOR CONTRACTOR DEPARTMENT HEAD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE * Contractor acknowledges by signing this agreement that no Social Security, Federal, or State taxes will be withheld from payments under this contract. However, payments under this contract may be taxable and an information return (IRS Form 1099) showing total contract payments made during the year will be sent to all contractors and to the Internal Revenue Service. PALMER DEPAULIS \b.\ ei 4� ` i( i 1 IM oJ�fa l MAX G. PETERSON, P.E. MAYOR d CITY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS City Engineering Division 444 SOUTH STATE STREET SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7871 TO : SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL DATE : MARCH 16 , 1990 REFERENCE : An agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the University of Utah to connect Wakara Street and Colorow Streets along a mutually accepted route located within the University Research Park . RECOMMENDATION ; That the Salt Lake City Council adopt a resolution granting approval for the Mayor to sign an agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation . AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS ; The City has available $ 126 , 000 in the Capital Improvement budget , Account No . 83-84006 . The University of Utah will provide $ 2 10 , 000 to the City . DISCUSSION ; Under the terms of this agreement the City agrees to prepare through its Engineering staff the design specification and drawings necessary to make said connection of said streets and to handle the construction contract administration . If the total cost for construction and engineering exceeds the $336 . 000 the University agrees to pay the balance necessary to complete improvements . SUBMITTED BY : JOSEPH R . ANDERSON , PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR �2 RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH WHEREAS, Title 11 Chapter 13, U.C.A. , 1953 as amended allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1 . That it does hereby approve the attached agreement generally described as follows : The connection by the City of Wakara and Colorow Streets in the University of Utah Research Park, with the City and the University each paying part of the cost . 2 . Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City this day of , 1990 . SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER RLM:cc i--?e cd r de4 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH FOR .STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN RESEARCH PARK THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the day of January, 1990 , by and between Salt Lake City Corporation, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, hereinafter "City" and the University of Utah, a subdivision of the State of Utah, hereinafter "University" . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS University is desirous of having Wakara and Colorow Streets connected which is located within University' s Research Park; and WHEREAS the City has $126 ,000 in a fund for the project; and WHEREAS the University is willing to pay the balance from University sources for making said street connections . NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties agree as follows : 1 . University has requested and the City is willing, under the following terms and conditions, to connect Wakara Street and Colorow Streets along a mutually accepted route located within the University' s Research Park. City presently has Capital Improvement Funds for Research Park roadway improvements, obtained by in lieu of tax payments from private companies or parties leasing property within said Research Park. City agrees to prepare through its Engineering staff the design specifications and drawings necessary to make said connection of said streets , and to handle the construction contract administration. All of the City' s expenses in preparing said plans and specifications and contract management and other related expenses shall be deducted from the said $126 , 000 fund and the balance shall be applied to the construction contract for the improvements . City will advertise and contract with a general contractor to install the connection between said two streets . University agrees to pay for the balance of said street improvements , presently estimated to be approximately $210 ,000, out of University funds . However, if the total cost for construction and engineering exceeds the combination of said two sums , or $336 , 000 , the University agrees to pay the balance necessary to complete said improvements . Should the balance require significant increase or exceed the estimate, the University may choose at its option to cancel the project, so long as it pays any expense incurred by the City up to the date of said cancellation. Said $210, 000 or additional sum necessary for the balance of said street improvements shall be transferred to the City prior to the City' s award of the contract for the improvements . All change orders must be prior approved by both parties . If the total cost for construction and engineering is less than said $336 , 000, the excess in funds shall be returned to the University. -2- City agrees to furnish a statement of all expenditures made in engineering and construction of said connection to the University upon written request. After said improvements are installed, the City agrees to maintain them as part of its regular street maintenance program. University has dedicated to the City sufficient property of the installation of said improvements and any utilities necessary within the connecting street between Wakara and Colorow Streets in said Research Park. 2 . The City shall design the drawings and specifications for the installation of said connecting roadway during the winter of 1990, and anticipate that the contract will be ready for bid by April 1990 with construction to proceed during the 1990 construction season. 3 . This agreement in not assignable by either party without the prior written consent of the other. 4 . This agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties and it cannot be altered except through a written instrument which is signed by both parties . IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties have signed this agreement to be effective as of the day and year first above written. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION By MAYOR -3- • ATTEST: CITY RECORDER UNIVERSITY OF UTAH BY /it/YZ ) �� Title 1/��e ��!�P•�r// J STATE OF UTAH ) ss . COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ,,((,,�� On the /Sr day of AAA" G-f" , 1990, personally appeared before me (it/ ltlIcft / GAJ 44 t' , who being by me duly sworn did say that ( s )he is the ( 4.1A0 , for the University of Utah, and is authorized by the University of Utah to sign in its behalf, and said University executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC, residing in G c,€' My Commission Expires : O�-(s, /953 Cr NOTARY RAMC 1 W.S.ROBE p mr Park Standby RLM:a Lett take C141 UNA 84112 Corapplision Ewe Oct.1 S,1993 STATE a UTM4 _es/ -4- ROGER F. CUTLER ��� ..5�..J ���� " ®��.,..1.iE ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS CITY ATTORNEY RAY L. MONTGOMERY STEVEN W. ALLRED LAW DEPARTMENT GREG R. HAWKINS m ATTORNEY LARRY V. SPENDLOVE DEPUTY c CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING BRUCE R. BAIRD CHERYL D. LUKE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 505 FRANK M. NAKAMURA CITY PROSECUTOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS TELEPHONE (801) 535-7788 CECELIA M. ESPENOZA GLEN A. COOK FAX (801) 535-7640 JANICE L. FROST March 26, 1990 Mayor Palmer A. DePaulis 451 South State Street, Room 306 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re: Disorderly Conduct Ordinance Amendment Dear Mayor: Submitted herewith is a proposed amended disorderly conduct ordinance for your review. We are submitting it as a recent Utah Court of Appeals decision casts doubt upon the validity of our present ordinance. We recommend this be passed to avoid future problems with criminal cases. Very truly ours, i GREG . HAWKINS Assistant City Attorney GRH:rc Enclosures i i DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Disorderly conduct) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 11, CHAPTER 12, Section 020 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, 1988, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO DISORDERLY CONDUCT, AS FOLLOWS: Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That Section 11. 12.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, 1988, as amended, relating to Offenses constituting a public nuisance, be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows: 11.12.020 Disorderly conduct. • A. A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if such person: 1 . * * * 2. * * * a. * * * b. * * * c. * * * 3. Uses [ ' , placc or under circuntances -which could cauac a breach of the peace of good order of the city. ] words which have a direct tendency to cause acts of violence by the person to whom the words are addressed. B. * * * C. * * * 0 SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 1990. Published: GRH:rc ifAPR 0 4 1990 gglEa ) L SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL PALMER DEPAULIS SIC aU I j�.l r"".r�. :2 MAYOR OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7704 TO: Salt Lake City Council April 2, 1990 Re: Public Parade Regulations - Ordinance Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing to discuss a proposed parade ordinance, regarding public parade regulations that shall apply to public property adjoining parade routes and staging areas. The ordinance relates to section 12.72.070 of the Salt Lake City Code, 1988 as amended relating to public parade regulations. Availability of Funds: Not applicable. Background and Discussion: This amendment will apply to public property adjacent to the parade routes and the staging areas. The. main provision sets forth that no one shall be allowed until 8:00 P.M. of the day before the public parade to actually claim or attempt to claim , reserve, or occupy, or otherwise control public property, either in person or by the placement of any object, such as, but not limited to, ropes, chairs, blankets, banners, vehicles or barriers of any kind. Further, no person shall place, erect, use or employ any tent or any other enclosed shelters, including, vehicles and trailers on public property along the parade route or the staging areas at any time. No person shall obstruct public sidewalks, paved portions of street, or occupy any unsafe position or occupy position which may cause damage to public or private property. All dogs except seeing eye dogs and dogs which are actually apart of the parade shall be prohibited on public property along the parade route and staging areas whether or not said dogs are leashed. At the conclusion of the Days of 47 Parade in 1989, the Salt Lake City Police Department formed a committee represented by the Traffic Division, Patrol Division and Watch Command to formulate a number of recommendations regarding problems they encountered with thousands of citizens who for several days prior to the parade had established camp sites, held impromptu parties and created immediate problems with families who were near by with children. Unfortunately, much of the parade route under the above described circumstances has turned into a partying type of atmosphere and does cause some lawlessness and causes risk to public safety. For these reasons the attached ordinance has been developed. Additionally, the Salt Lake City/County Health Department and the Days for '47 Committee have helped to develop the attached ordinance and they concur with the 8:00 P.M. occupying restrictions along the route. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's office has prepared the necessary ordinance and is ready for your action. Submitted By: Mayor cc: Chief of Police Michael Chabries Dr. Harry Gibbons Days of '47 Committee Central Business Improvement District Downtown Retail Merchants Association • DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Public parade regulations) AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 12.72.070 TO THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, 1988, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO PUBLIC PARADE REGULATIONS. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That Section 12.72.070 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to Public parade regulations, be, and the same hereby is, added to read as follows: 12.72.070 Regulations for public property adjacent to parade routes. The following shall apply to public property adjoining parade routes and staging areas for parades and it shall be unlawful for any person to violate these provisions. A. Before 8:00 p.m. of the day before the public parade no person shall actually claim or attempt to claim, reserve, occupy or otherwise control public property either in person or by the placement of any object, such as, but not limited to, ropes, chairs, blankets, banners, or vehicles, or barriers of any kind. B. From and after 8:00 p.m. of the day before a parade, a person may physically occupy a position on public property and may use a blanket, sleeping bag, or chair to reserve the position for himself/herself. No person may reserve a space for anyone other than themselves. No person may claim or attempt to 1 reserve any public property for themselves or others by placement of ropes, tents, barricades or other barriers. C. No person shall place, erect, use or employ any tent or other enclosed shelters, including vehicles and trailers, on public property along a parade route or staging areas at any time. D. No person shall obstruct public sidewalks, paved portions of streets, or occupy any unsafe position or occupy a position which may cause damage to public or private property. E. From and after 8:00 p.m. of the day before a parade and continuing until the conclusion of the parade, no person shall park a motor vehicle, trailer or tent trailer on the streets designated as the parade route. Only motor vehicles and trailers which are parade entries or parts thereof are allowed to be in the areas designated as staging areas. Any vehicle, motor vehicle, trailer or tent trailer parked in violation of this section is a public nuisance and may be towed from the prohibited area at the owner' s expense F. As part of the permit process the Mayor may authorize: 1. The City to reserve places for the observation of the parade and to erect and control seating on said reserved public property; 2. The permit holder to reserve areas for observation of the parade and to erect and control seating in the reserved areas. -2- G. From and after 8:00 p.m. of the night before a parade and continuing until the conclusion of the parade, all dogs, except seeing-eye dogs and dogs who are actually part of the parade, shall be prohibited on public property along the parade route and staging areas whether or not said dogs are leashed. This section shall not prohibit owners of dogs who live adjacent to the parade route from taking their leashed dogs on walks to and from their property using the most direct route away from the parade route. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER -3- P (SEAL) Bill No. of 1990. Published: GRH:rc -4- , 3 r ,j r i - b9 f... ,-. l , i i . 2 A)_Q,'1(��IrT.�r NM°'e7..t1,GN[ TELEPHONE(801)799-3000 • 315EAST 200 SOUTH MIKE CHABRIES FAX(801)799-3557 SALT LAKE-CITY, UTAH 84111 CHIEF OF POLICE March 27 , 1990 TO: Chairman Alan G. Hardman and Members of City Council RE : An Ordinance Enacting Sections 12.56 .302, 12.56.303, and 12.56 .304 , and amending subparagraphs A. and B.l. of Section 12.56.550, Salt Lake City Code, Relating to Civil Penalties for Unauthorized use of High School Parking Lots. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council consider adoption and amending the ordinance regarding civil enforcement of high school parking lot restrictions . AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: Not Applicable . DISCUSSION: At the time the Parking Ordinances were changed from criminal to civil, the section pertaining to civil enforcement of high school parking lot restrictions was not included. Police Department agrees with draft ordinance . Sub itte y: �c f ii.:464.r.c.z.z...) MICHAEL P . CHABRIES , Chief of Police Salt Lake City Police Dept. DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Civil enforcement of high school parking lot restrictions) AN ORDINANCE ENACTING SECTIONS 12. 56.302, 12. 56.303, AND 12 . 56 .304, AND AMENDING SUBPARAGRAPHS A. AND B. 1 . OF SECTION 12. 56 . 550, SALT LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO CIVIL PENALTIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED USE OF HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOTS. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That Section 12. 56.302, Salt Lake City Code, be, and the same hereby is, enacted to read as follows: 12.56.302 High school parking lots--Parking permit required. A. No high school student or faculty member shall park a motor vehicle in any of the high school parking lots in the Salt Lake City School District, without first obtaining each year a parking permit for parking at a particular high school from said district. The permit shall be obtained from the principal of the school at which parking is desired. The permit must be placed in the rear window or in a conspicuous place at the rear of the vehicle for which the permit was obtained and which is parked on such high school property. Such permits are not transferable and possession of a parking permit does not guarantee a specific parking lot or space on said high school property. B. All parking and non-parking areas shall be designated with the approval of the city transportation engineer, marked, and maintained by the Salt Lake City School District. SECTION 2. That Section 12. 56.303, Salt Lake City Code, be, and the same hereby is, enacted to read as follows: 12.56.303 High school parking lot regulations. Neither students nor faculty of a Salt Lake City high school shall park a motor vehicle in city high school parking lot areas marked and designated for visitors, or in areas other than where allowed by their respective permit and no visitors shall park in city high school parking lot areas other than those marked or designated for parking by visitors. No person without a "handicapped" student or faculty parking permit shall park a motor vehicle in any parking space marked or designated for the handicapped. Delivery vehicles may park in designated delivery areas for a period not to exceed thirty minutes. SECTION 3. That Section 12. 56.304, Salt Lake City Code, be, and the same hereby is, enacted to read as follows: 12. 56.304 No-parking areas in high school parking lots. No person shall park a motor vehicle in those areas of a high school parking lot where the curb is painted red, in driveways, or in other areas designated as no-parking areas, or in unmarked areas such as unmarked roads or alleyways. SECTION 4. That the title and subparagraphs A. and B. 1 . of Section 12. 56 . 550, Salt Lake City Code, be, and the same hereby are, amended to read as follows: 12.56.550 Unauthorized use of streets, parking lots, and other areas--Penalties. -2- A. Any person engaging in the unauthorized use of streets, parking lots, or other areas as provided under this chapter, within the city, shall be liable for a civil penalty. Any penalty assessed herein may be in addition to such other penalties as may be provided in this Title 12 of the Salt Lake City Code. B. 1 . Civil penalties shall be imposed as follows; Ordinance Penalty 12. 56.030 $55.00 12. 56 .040 55.00 12. 56.050 52.00 12. 56 .080 55.00 12. 56. 100 50.00 12. 56 . 110 50.00 12. 56.120 65.00 12. 56 . 130 65.00 12. 56.150 47.00 12. 56 . 180 50.00 12. 56.190 47.00 12. 56 .210 52.00 12. 56.240 55 .00 12. 56 .250 52.00 12. 56.290 52.00 12. 56 .300 52.00 12. 56.302 47.00 12. 56 .303 47.00 12. 56.304 47. 00 12. 56 .310 55.00 12. 56.330 55 . 00 12. 56.350 50.00 12. 56.360 55.00 12. 56 .380 55.00 12. 56.390 52.00 12. 56.400 50. 00 12. 56.410 50.00 12. 56 .420 55. 00 12. 56.430 50.00 12. 56 . 440 52.00 12. 56.450 47.00 12. 56 . 460 55. 00 12. 56.470 55 .00 12. 56 . 480 52. 00 12. 56.490 55 .00 -3- 12. 56. 500 55.00 12. 56. 510 55. 00 12. 56. 520 50.00 12. 56 . 560 55. 00 SECTION 5 . EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on . Mayor' s action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. OF 1990. Published: . LVS :rc -4- G \` CRAIG E. PETERSON S..,r'`I .,r tatty 0 ° DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 218 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7777 TO: Salt Lake City Council March 15, 1990 Re: Restrictive Covenants on Blocks 79, 84 and the south half of Block 85 Recommendation: That the City Council hold a non-advertised public hearing on April 10, 1990 at 6:20 p.m. to discuss modifications to the restrictive covenants on Block 79, 84 and the south half of Block 85, Plat A Salt Lake City Survey to allow the construction of the Jazz Arena and Plaza. Availability of Funds: Not applicable Discussion and Background: In preparing the necessary arrangements for the Jazz Arena a restrictive covenants agreement between Triad Utah and Salt Lake City Corporation dated May 14, 1982 was discovered. The agreement was adopted to allow Salt Lake City Corporation to set the conceptual framework of integrated design, use, pedestrian circulation, open space, amenities and other concepts of the Triad Center project. The agreement is still binding to the new property owners because both property owners acquired the property from Triad by taking deeds in lieu of foreclosure. The modifications will allow the construction of the Jazz Arena and Plaza. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's Office will prepare the necessary resolution and will be ready for your review prior to the hearing. ubmitted by: v‘i -Y(-9 CHAEL B. ZUHL Interim Director lf/ SALT'Le' 6-1q1,117 CORPORATION ALLEN C. JOHNSON, AICP PLANNING AND ZONING PLANNING DIRECTOR COMMISSION MEMBERS W IL LIAM T. WRIGHT. AICP COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RALPH BECKER DEPUTY DIRECTOR PLANNING DIVISION DAN BETHEL SUPERVISOR LONG RANGE PLANNING Planning and Zoning Commission CINDY CROMER AND URBAN DESIGN THOMAS A, ELLISON SANDRA MARLER 451 SOUTH STATE S1 REET LAVONE LIDDLE-GAMONAL SECRETARY ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING RICHARD J. HOWA RALPH P. NEILSON SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 GEORGE NICOLATUS TELEPHONE 535-7757 JOHN M. SCHUMANN April 6, 1990 Mr. Mike Zuhl, Interim Director Department of Conununity & Economic Development Salt Lake City Corporation BUILDING Dear Mike: Attached please find the "1990 Amended Triad Center Master Plan" for Blocks 79, 84 and 85 in Salt Lake City Survey Plat "A". The amended Master Plan is necessary due to changing economic, land use and ownership considerations on these Blocks in Downtown Salt Lake City. The Planning Division and Planning Commission recommend the City Council adopt the amended Master Plan after holding the public hearing on Tuesday April 10, 1990. This 1990 Amended Triad Center Master Plan will serve as a conceptual guide to the development of Blocks 79, 84 and 85 and will serve as the attachment "Master Plan" to the "Agreement Regarding Restrictive Covenants" between Salt Lake City and Triad Utah dated May 14, 1982. The restrictive covenants outlines the process for review of development plans by the Salt Lake City Planning Division to assure conformity with the Amended Triad Center Master Plan. The amendment of the original Triad Center Master Plan is necessary at this time to proceed with the development of the new Jazz Arena on Block 79. The Planning Commission recommended removing all references to Block 78 since it is not covered by the restrictive covenants. Master planning for that Block will be developed as part of the "North Edges Plan" of the Downtown Master Plan. The Planning Division agrees with their recommendation. Mr. Mike Zuhl April 6, 1990 Page 2 The present property owners on the three blocks affected by this Master Plan amendment are: Block 84: Travelers Insurance Company Bonneville International Corporation Triad Center Devereaux Partners Block 85: Deseret Title Holding Corporation Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City Romney Lumber Company Block 79: Travelers Insurance Company Triad Center FISMA Inc. All property owners of record were notified of the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. If you have any questions, please call me. Respectfully submitted, Allen JohnS'on AICP Planni g Dir9tor Attachments ACJ:WIW THE 1990 AMENDED "TRIAD CENTER MASTER PLAN" for Blocks 79, 84 and 85 Salt Lake City, Utah PURPOSE • ra its The 1990 Amended Triad Center Master Plan for Blocks 79, 84 and 85 in Salt Lake City Survey Plat "A" is presented due to changing economic, land use and ownership considerations. This 1990 Amended Triad Center Master Plan will serve as a conceptual guide to the development of Blocks 79, 84 and 85 and will serve as the attachment "Master Plan" to the "Agreement Regarding Restrictive Covenants" between Salt Lake City and Triad Utah dated May 14, 1982. The "1990 Amended Triad Center Master Plan" was adopted by the Salt Lake City Council on 1990 in accordance with the procedures set forth in the "Agreement Regarding Restrictive Covenants" . ELEMENTS OF THE MASTER PLAN The Master Plan provides general land use and design guidelines. The general land uses and building orientation is illustrated on the conceptual site plan on page 2. The design guidelines are consistent with the original "Triad Center" specifications; however, the plan introduces additional bulk/massing concepts, building materials and color, and streetscape design standards. Open space design continues to play an important role in the urban design of these blocks. As in the original concept as "The Gathering Place", the Master Plan promotes architectural coordination and a designed pedestrian space to bring the scale of large building structures to a human, comfortable level. The amended plan foresees the development of the new Jazz Arena by Larry Miller and Salt Lake City on Block 79. Additionally, the "Triad" development on Block 84 is reduced in scale with the deletion of the proposed 40 story tower. This plan acknowledges a well designed, landscaped surface parking lot as an interim use until economic market conditions support a building development west of the Devereaux Mansion. A parking structure designed to be architecturally compatible with the Triad image and standards will be developed on the northwest corner of the block. Lastly, Block 85, now mostly owned by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (LDS Church) will provide parking in the interim with long term development as the west edge of the "LDS Church Campus" along the northern edge of the Central Business District. . .... .. L 1, id -.\. . ____ _ i ._. NORTH TEMPLE a---1- ---t F , • ., •.: ..4.., •‘.. •.',•1 • • ',. • •,..i '• . /..,0'" -'1 i k t 1 44'••• C ',, , . •••• '". - - '''1 '41'qj. f.t: 4-- ''' -,4-,-=, — -n- -1.- .,, .• 1-"-- - .4-1, --t I . _•-_:.' .7_7 .. . i * -- .‘1 • t:' I .;1' '-'; I - -, • BLOCK 84 \ 1 ' ( '''' 'k4.' _________ ' ,, 1 ,.... 4 .• ' '',, NORTH PLAZA TOWER rIr'' BLOCK 85 L NORTH PLAZA I;'1 au •' .; • .4 a ,. OFFICE is r —,-,•. PARKING . '• -r. . • I.II. ..". . STRUCTURE lit — I'l___I [ I ) . ,:i,..'i'. j' -- i . BUILDABLE SITE I'YI :lq'., u'. •I , ! I' • ,Ii _________. , ) \ , -4, ' 5-• 4..I1,' i,. !. . I • , ,4: td . 1 _.i 1 • ,.f.4,.. — ,,.----.......441.1.- ;/3.4'''.' 1 i _''i}1 '. IT)-,:.,. ---), , •-• .1 .,, BROADCAST HOUSE L• ' : tiii,,‘I — - i 1-4 •,, / -;' :‘,I:11 i I I- II' • I t?iji:', ' 1,7,3)111?-b1.14 PiDEgT4iAN/VIFW,4-88RIFJOR 1, ' • .... _... FUTURE ,17,1 :•., .., ' I j j . , ',I, ci ' BUILDING SITE j A', .._IHL"77------ N.rcz..- ' //i.-.•' -N\'' , , ,. rl__ , , 't ..:; — '1 I li...,,'', ......rlf ., , ... -. 1,, I i .',,.. BUILDABLE SITE I 1 1 i INTERIM ',,!'- DEVEREA A lioba 1! ; • SURFACE ' -- ' ' -,--11 I ' —1-r-1 ,:. . . _ PARKING - .„„ , i,. I 1 1 A.,.• • ',?..- i '., • - , 1--- ..,•• ,\ 1 • i , • I . .. I ' 1 . • , — • f,,:, • Ittti Rtil pat i ,,.., -A t I • • t.t.40;e , . . , is ' -,-,. f 1 ''''' II o -; I I_ ?JZ_..1.i_. % , t, '"' , , _ , . li ,CT,' -''2' :*\.tt. ‘-----,y.,, - ' --tt' , tu ,t.•.'t ' , It: "'"I\,_ , - .--t4__-.2.- ,;.1!:1; ttl!liv, _. . . a a-. t(_._ 1%) 5 -- —I.=_;,.,------,--------------11•,---- - -c_-7:: .-7.---- ----------=-— • F 4 . , (i, ' I t4'' ''-'47' '• 1:7'1'. \ I '` --- .,-1,1132-.(:P ,,..• ,1:-. SOUTH TEMPLE I I I a z d',I_../_2,__4.iiii0'‘ •' 'I • ''‘"-I '' • ---''• I ,!!,!!,• 1,111 '' III ,-. -.1.;,,1,,, Iif,,,t, , , ! ,,i, .!' t r '1 3'..,71-C-77F----i,,I,. :i....‘,_ VIM i ,- ,:.. y.:L_ ,,,., , ',is:i1,.. ;-_1•Thil,A it'1e.q ..f_c.' 4A VP /I,,I_, ... , _ . 1 ( ,_,,._._._t•.., .. .i--- ,..,- , t.,:•:.1 4;,-.-,k '-',„ ..`'•r E _ L._ 1 = _ _. - , -.?''' ' ' t,if.i,;,,,•••-,,'I ,! .,,,,,, -. ., . , . -. 15PEit "::, • ';,' - ..— , ., ., . ., .. . ,sii,At-f,' 1 . ,.. j o,',7 '.•'-' .,--,;.iiiki :,"i., , .,,..11,,,--.;•,. , ,.,. •A2 A !.,: ,....:,•7 DOUBLE TREE HOTEL il •I:i f, _.1 — ,o,:',._„,-L4 . ,ta;..:. . .1.21.._rr. ,.,..• ., -.,• OP 14-gPitcet 6- . t-- .. 4 ,''-VIT''' !..r-F!;,-,,R.Y.,,F,,,- ..-.•.,,,Y.:k '..oh,,w.;.',.:-.'- ,.7.,,, S 1 1 ,.. •:;;Ii ' .:!!,, . "i' .,,okC,` {N'' • '',.-4, ',-.`,)' ' . ,-1-' ,.1 t• , 5/ 4' 'V! --Th . ,. 1 s 1 tI kre. i .= .;c, ' 1) ' :- . `•..,•=Cvs. .--- . '.--- -5i - . 4 .,.,,,:t ,..,,,,,, . , , 3 ,.-.-1 :' JAZZ ARENA r \,.... :' il.'i_,;..!,I•" ‘•,,,,,,T!! ,g. ,',,,•"[...: ,-- . • c,,,, .?I , ,, .. VA'' ,r1 tt it.-r,," ,• 1 t„ -ftifIti Ft''-r A' .-.,1 './ ,..0i,,' -...t.f'‘It ! g_614 ''''t •'t '• ' 't.' 'i I .,, .•--t 1" g','T'g, ,,o,, ., , J1-1,' ,o,,N r,,:., ,I•, • .‘•;:r•-•:,•1•4 Ii.: 11-,ei,4%;.•1.g.,; 1,1 If' %f, %-,; • %. *: ;-%',1%.%31'.1. 'il 't,•BLOCK SERvICE AREA . it";i ,! •,i,% _•;., ti •'.... .• ,. r (,.. i ..•1., ,.q'', , ..,,..,„„. -., .. • ,.. I '4:4:4,;--, I .... r•'' /7- :,;"iI ''16 ilri.I•' • C )i , 1 . , ./ BLOCK 78 ft- )" .-.1 t., .• , ,,,,:t,;;, ',,,..,.,79 ., •. '1,',el,=',..,,,1 -it; - ,., .' ilfpfre i,-, .:..., • .._-_, - , _ ---- m..•••••••.. . . .......... _ . . . • 1)-„ .. , Vi. , ' ' ?''. .....i: t.,1F,. '''.:T', V.'i , 100 SOUTH STREET -.) I DESIGN GUIDELINES BULK/MA.SSING OF STRUCTURES The general mass of structures should be sensitive to surrounding structures. Many of the buildings along South Temple are of a monumental status. The Salt Palace, Symphony Hall, Triad and Union Pacific Depot are all large buildings. Smaller buildings tend to lose their presence unless they are accompanied by significant open space similar to the Devereaux House on Block 84. The new Arena and plaza will occupy all of Block 79. The use of extensive clear glass walls will assist in reducing the mass of the structure. New construction on Block 85 would be most appropriate of the scale and mass of the LDS Church Art Museum and Genealogical Library. Because of the major view corridor from the west towards Temple Square, high-rise structures similar to the condominium/office/hotel towers proposed in the original Triad Center Master Plan are strongly discouraged. MATERIALS AND COLOR In general materials and colors used for new construction should be sensitive to their surrounding buildings. The original Triad Center Master Plan was complementary to the Union Pacific Depot by mirroring the red brick and copper roof with red brick and copper glazed glass. Strict adherence to this is not completely necessary but it should provide a basic guideline. Because of the proximity of the Triad and Arena blocks (Blocks 79 and 84) to the Union Pacific Depot, building materials used should be compatible with the Union Pacific Depot Building. * Materials appropriate for the Triad and Arena blocks (Blocks 79 and 84) include red brick, copper glass, clear glass, copper, unfinished concrete, sandstone, other native stone and earth tone stucco. Green tinted glass may be appropriate if it is non-reflective and is of the same hue as the anodized copper of the Union Pacific Depot. * Materials inappropriate for the Triad and Arena blocks (Blocks 79 and 84) include silver or pastel (blue, pink) reflective glass, polished steel or other silver metals, white or pastel tile or paneling and white stucco. Block 85 will develop as an extension of the LDS Church Campus and materials should reflect the established pattern of that district. * material appropriate for block 85 include granite, stone, brick, stucco, clear glass and sandstone. * materials inappropriate would include silver or pastel reflective glass curtainwalls. -3- OPEN SPACE Open Space can enhance the character of the South Temple area. The NE and SE corners at 400 West are particularly important for maintaining the aesthetic character of the Union Pacific Depot. Fountains, artwork or plazas at grade are appropriate at these corners. The 4 corners of the South Temple/300 West intersection are also appropriate for open space. The block face between 300 and 400 West along South Temple should also contain a landscaped setback equivalent to what now exists at the Devereaux House to maintain the view corridor to the Union Pacific Depot. A Midblock connection from the Triad Center to Temple Square through block 85 is appropriate. The map shows several potential building sites. It is not expected that the entire site will be filled with structures and that there will be additional opportunity for open space connected with the development. S South Temple is a major boulevard of Salt Lake City and any public street improvements should reinforce that status. North Temple and 300 West are also major thoroughfares that deserve special treatment for their full length. 100 South and 400 West are part of the general Downtown district and improvements should be consistent with established Downtown themes. Indian Head lighting should be placed the full length of South Temple from State Street to 400 West. The existing street lighting that was put in along South Temple by Triad should be relocated to 300 West Street and should serve as the theme for future lighting improvements along 300 West. North Temple is a major thoroughfare and should have a consistent lighting theme for is full length. Indian Head lamps should also be used on 400 West and 100 South. The predominant element of sidewalk paving along South Temple is red brick with concrete or sandstone highlights. Other paving materials are inappropriate. Other streets should use the standard Downtown paving plan of concrete with brick highlights. Any plaza or open space development adjacent to the sidewalk should be sensitive to the streetscape design. Strcct trees should be planted in all park strips to emphasize the formality of the street. Planted center medians are acceptable on both South Temple and 300 West. A spacious, convenient pedestrian skywalk is acceptable to bridge 300 West Street from "Broadcast House" to new development on Block 85 because 300 West is a busy major thoroughfare and State Highway that does not contain a major view corridor. An underground connection from the arena to the Salt Palace would also be acceptable. Overhead skywalks along South Temple are inappropriate and unacceptable because of the major scenic vistas along the street and its desired pedestrian orientation. -4- SALT LAKE',0,ITY CORPORATION ALLEN C. JOHNSON, AICP PLANNING AND ZONING PLANNING DIRECTOR COMLAsSi0:N MEMBERS WILLIAM T. WRIGHT. AICP COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RALPH BECKER DEPUTY DIRECTOR PLANNING DIVISION DAN BETHEL SUPFRVISDR LONG RANGE PLANNING Planning and Zoning Commission CINDY CROMER AND URBAN DESIGN THOMAS A. ELLISON SANDRA MARLER 451 SOUTH STATE STREET LAVONE LIDDLE-GAMONAL Bch 30, 1990 RICHARD J. HOWA sE ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING RALPH P. NEILSON SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 GEORGE NICOLATUS To Whom it May Concern; TELEPHONE 535-1757 JOHN M. SCHUMANN Restrictive covenants that were attached to the deed of the original Triad Center properties require that any development on the block be consistent with an adopted Master Plan. Due to changing economic, land use and ownership considerations, the Master Plan that was adopted for Triad Center in 1982 has now become outdated. To update this Master Plan and to meet obligations regarding the restrictive covenants, the Salt Lake City Planning Staff has proposed the "1990 Amended Triad Center Master Plan for Blocks 79, 84 and 85 in Salt Lake City Survey Plat A". This 1990 Amended Triad Center Master Plan will serve as a conceptual guide to the development of Blocks 79, 84 and 85 and will serve as the attachment "Master Plan" to the "Agreement Regarding Restrictive Covenants" between Salt Lake City and Triad Utah dated May 14, 1982. The Salt Lake City Landmarks Committee will be discussing this on their agenda at their regularly scheduled meeting on Wednesday April. 4, 1990 at 3:00 PM in Room 126, Salt Lake City/County Building, 451 South State. The Salt Lake City Planning Commission will be discussing this on their agenda at their Thursday April 5, 1990 meeting in Room 126, Salt Lake City/County Building, 451 South State. The meeting begins at 5:00 PM, however, since it is not a formal hearing a specific time to discuss the Master Plan has not been set. The Salt Lake City Council will have a formal public hearing; Tuesday April 10, 1990 6:20 PM Council Chambers, Roan 315 City/ County Building 451 South State If you have any questions please contact Doug Dansie in the Planning Office for more information. Sincerft-l1; Alle 'C. Johnson AICP Planr nq erector • WI-AM:::P:..a•4•1*Nr*.' _ •y ••� Riy...:�• fr•>. •'•' . :fR.:.•....••.' 'r ' • 7. -^',..•- *seil '-ti-J/• 1 .• Y' O•44,. ",- ..-.e:-,:m:.+ ..- v ti - 7.:.rrh.. ti.�a•..t... ,r",lot,"12.y .,..r1y�y. ...1ti.aky _,.w •. .. "J,'S.%J. w 'i •.."• fti �12 .7,M.Mt1!M � 1'i'S. \ s - S• �,,,� .u, !,,4.-_ :...v . R M O .Y'n',+�.'.% •.1 '. '- 7 •+.$see..,v^f.-.... *it••+...4 r, *`_ tit i r.•i.-. ]kv)Y'.IfaZIfi ' '':.. �r i . •:i,y_ 7. �t. t t t..4t - - :•f .. :.'.!'.t-p.7...•. -• iiin' r r -. '- ' r t Ti�•P - - - '•-•. ,.0 .i}\,' . . • • .r r r ••.1 • - - • • ..• ►'. •,,•.II. ,r-1l /��.�-(yam`//) A/ 7 i. t•:, .:+� N�nsZ „� A01tE:KENT RSOARDINO RESTRICTIVE COV4UAY'?! tj. 9 ,. �. JI �Y::i 1 - T„ d ,;,;: •j • This Agreement le entered into this 'COI da f 1lat7; .:,• �.., •1;!. 19N1 by and between MALT LAX: CITY CORPORA?I0N, a municipal• . :a tl f'►r.'1,, :.,. ,. corpo[ation of the ®Late oC Utah, RersinaLtsr 'City', and TRIAD xA=; .,_• - •;, .-;. UTAH, a Utah c+�rporacion, h+'rslnaffor 'Triad' , - --4t� `h WHEREAS, Triad is the developer of the TRIAD CENTER ;'. =. t lai, project with respect to the following described real property , w"" "^'' yr : located in Salt Lake County, Utah,ua?+n �'r Blocks 79 and 84, and the South ono-half of ' '' % :lock 85, Plat 'A', Salt Lake City Survey, t • •• ... M which property is hereinafter referred co ae the 'Real Prop- _,; -,_ arty'r and - '; T i* EREAB, the City and Triad desire that the Reel Prop- ! . erty be submitted to the restrictive -ovenanta hereina.`.ter set ff••` ,..c ,r.ylL •• .;f -„41� � forth. ;•'1 -_• '` •' •yh,} NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable coneldei noon, it.ii: the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Triad. A its ■uc- •• -7 ;;147:1i :::r Aer, aessors and assigns, hereby agree that the Real Property, to %-t., • •.•1-,' Athe extant the same ie owned, legally or equitably, or con- :r, '"t„Ole trollied, by Triad, or any successor or aesi4n who received ita ".... = "'' '' ''r 1� ;_: righ'c to acquire an intereot in the Real Property by or through _ .c ' _i Triad, shall by subject to the following covenants, conditions • %. 44ti, -v�•'.• and restrictions, which covenants, conditions and restrictions t •,: J -', shall attach to and run with the lands 1. Attached to that certain Agreement of even date ..r ,�r ,•;; : . herewith boutsen the parties hereto is a series of blueprint. -*•�i !1e drawings, diagrams and renderings which set forth the cost- �- - :-- `:E:�:� ..-•• -�Y - aeptual aster plan as the same has been submitted by Triad to EX HIBIT_Z ,� } •. .... 'ro• —..A,#RJI; '.'•'. ;Ji�, i::r•+••i r•• .�•0:••4.1714",..:1":21.. Os.i:.4 4 'A,'••4,'' 1 e• • r 1 fi i) :+ :. r ::r' •.. 0'}7 ., '. > , :s..4Py .4; . t1�: 1. ._,.t+� '• '+7c S • to+-.q. , -,1'.►• �' •--In:ft!r!,,Y r.-' ••,,`,' .•4 r`,.":ri `, ."-,r�7�+.'• Par.• A..1. .I-• ' '' ti.. 7. r,.!. .'C+ NO -••-_ :.; :':.•,x 4:711.; .`•.'._. • . :! Y. • 1•1• •?1�W-••��'.4 •!'rWa,.R+a .V�.7. .i,V• •,, -.'%; - ^:.�--,,. c, „.•. ,?01^ , r • :1•175:.5 . i...:. ,..;• ,.'fir ••..;••.: Ste• S .p`.t i .�w•J. •.;!••.,S .• :•,.. .. .:•►'.w ,- - -h flYy ..i ,y-r..• .••,•,•. j• + i•• b+�41ty...•..,r'•-‘i••^'a. . .. -. .�:-•,+.y!t;t.•.-.' . . i�r. 1• w•' . •1 :�.." :"..f- 1::•N4. e•,4�'.1:.•,4: :.,:• •1' - - d .i'0!jr.t , i r'�:NI*. r• t. ILit rfl'+;'_•f the City Council hereinafter referred to as the 'Master V. '7 t:1• ' -!• Y4ii;..1 7. =.:'1• Plan"! The Master Plan, as defined, shall include any amend- -• - • ' ' *.`t •fit, ..+. .n••i•ilite•� TI„x wants or modifications hereinafter approved by the City •• - • ' r • /Y)4 +l/E•p _ ; / Council, and the City mny approve any eaendaenta to the Master ' F-;, !, v..l Plan after a • ^.;'r j;,,;".-, h]AS/�� / public hearing where at least _S days notice is j .. ?•[:f ��J /p.ovided to property w sere of record within the prolec`�` The ; : •7, L 'Ty •`/onsent or apprcval of any owner of an interest in the Reid ' - !;fir ,z.4•,. z:S f.. -4'':- Property is not necessary to much approval. Said Master Pia.1 •r'T..y %ikar sets the conceptual framework of integrated design, use, - .' A• • pedestrian circulation, open space, amenities and other Con- y..1 • r cepts of the Triad Center project against which all construc- tion '. . ,r•. ' •y'�g4.� ia' -�I --- _ h ' •:� y.• , ,;. plane will be reviewed by the City, ' k,..I {'� } It is hereby agrewd by Triad, ea the developer. its 'i �f • +A i+• " �'t' =-;� successors in interest and assigns, and/or contractors or ten` ''_'+�- y,� . , .,'.••••••.,. ',r-• '474.Pt.I.A4 .�.a.f !t ants, desiring construction on the Real Property, that the as.• • 7. 'j.,!'-: �:i; shall submit their plane to the Planning Department for review ',- •• -. '41t.f1 ;y ' ' �Sa44...44011:- and evaluation in conformity with said Master Plan. This ._. ;� s , review for conformity is in addition to evaluation for cospll- «� N. 42 . i9;1 41 t"'r•AT• ance with applicable ordinances and muet precede any applica- `"+r+j=' r< . tions for building permits. The plane will be reviewed by the ._---• 'fc `3 tTs � Planning Department for such conformity within fourteer. (14) ;ti=- • ,; �F'` days, and should the Planning Department find proposed con- y:::. r.▪ •F �,4 t y •:P 4. -.,,ti• �',� . . f1 struction plans are not in keeping with ordinances and with the - � s;i. ;s;�•.... Master Plan, the City shall notify the applicant and may .a,-it t ;; ri.- _;53,• request modification to bring the plan into conform!'•}. Triad, :• ' .: •: ,' '•-',4,n. r '•' .4., as developer, agrees, on behalf of itself And any tenant or -,1 •`1.. -a '''•',• aucceeeor in interest in the project, that the Planning Depart- -+=s" ;. ;: _.=y;��;,:w�'�;-. gent shall withhold tonlaq- approval and' the City shall not '-• . •,%ryl'� + +7�,T4'':!_ .. issue permits for construction. plans 17nleee the plane sub— � • fe- -/1.off-. stantiallyconform to said Master Pl en and also t-:' - • .� `�'ft':,.1,�• � 1 0 comply with -�:: ' .r• , • t•-• • tir.:• ice_(. •,_ •?.,ly.. {'' c', t•• •: • /..,,• .vi .''•:1 r 'wa%w ' :�'.:w•::'' . - - -••• : .- _1 i- `f- 't' -4• 4 t re* ?.• !7•#ry.M 7. ,F..j. r :,-Az 1 • �: r ••..•; '•,• :i 'I?'1,•= 'x• • - v`r t• '"S •'-1' -It• .•iL ..n Fi •., .. ,3 .t" .J . r '-- - •-C+d (!*t .-:' t.,, ..!T::: . • -t:• V {y.-•u rt1177•7 7ren:�.-?••t ; x1,7-,_' r(: ;;-:,.^,Y+! .•� .'' ' yr• •t• •,'.•• -- .r1iM• -• • t"-c:-- tti7•r1i+ ycr•,':. '••:,: .l • • '',r,:."1';4". •.••.r. ...fir..•:.. : --.: ,• , .ft�•:• %It ,' -t•. ._•�•, . r. . . • ') • •4';.•l f' r t• .• • .tom - •% • ' esti4161 •i•.. -It'•: I • i -�• it: ::•'• �: t.: 's •-. '^""1-: applicable ornancoe, Any disputes over the Planning Depart-. -•� ^Y y,, zr libl di •14,- ? aent's judgment of the 'sieve of confoc»cnas shall be appealable ._• ' ry s `4- to and _finally decided by the Mayor after conauotinq an • .�.0- •+? - `�` I r .If administrative public hearing on the natter• Written notice shall be �E't'"e0,2e.t i.. givenby the City Recorder to the interested partite :� - -.1�: = prior to the hearing Attu. • _- •• • ' .e 'W:Y + Additionally, City may w$chi -itd approvals on future r•`r' " 7i11—`-. ;;• plans to require corrective work should developer or builder ' ,+`f� a .►, .. ;': 11►►�a�=/.:�'� fail to construct in confc'rmity to thr plans approved h; the '• 4 •• •• - �w irrK •°1 , r Planning Department without receiving a consent to modify -- if . --• L �'4,j4 the changes relate to the overall site and Waster Plan. -.-• :4;��'� '�=: �,.. 2. Triad agrees. to indemnify and hold the City harm- `�.,. -- a;Sgh.; less, and does hereby indemnify and aive the City harmless, ��: • - :- v •,; "0-.' from all costs, loss, damage and expense of every kind and %Jr, _',: `''4"L ` y` i nature arising out of or connected to this Agra. ent. Triad "'�` `' '" +•• (y will., •upon demand from the City, assume the defense of the :.r.';at""s.':-� 15 City, in any action instituted against the City because of the - • r ~,P �= �; i existence of this Agreement or the violation of any of the °.; .i;;, f terms of this Agreement. S•P•: - ''ems ,ram , .'? - 3. This Agreement, and the restrictive covenants set ''?">_'. <i '� '�"' •`• forth herein, shall: terminate and become null and void on and • !`� * �`' .,4 . .T. .1;,;• after Nay 3L, 1997,• without further action, and without further _ . "'':"-to. execution of any. document, by any party or entity, including _I,��: ` r ;'.: :. f '�� without limitation the City or any owner of r.ny interest in the y1:' ' +^ `,1. •r 3,..t jilw • ct...• • ti:_ •-* •1-4 ii Real Property. • 442.07, AV • :: iiM•:! ! t. r.{,. '7-f• :z •f ait. R, •,•:•,• w , `.g.i...� ce Ac;Y'y R s- ,.. E ip:q ,' '► F • ,..47( :'L.x {.: a •v •.a• -1' ' ''-''.r::- *7ls�w—,yr. _ - -.mow;,-•" 7,-` • " , 44J .+..: ' .� • o.l `i-*. r f ' '.•:5 ',, f ?�';Yh a.� t 1 •�'[ . � rs.'•• ••`:fY w.� 4 f-Y•Yr! . ri jS►'•.- .•'- ••!ty;K:, , -'••Li. + Yt •1� r. r • �► r...�'1,,i W e i. , 'y'�.. pa' `• '/`r, '. .I •!'1 :'j•j• .0,1r tm '�s?0.set4 4 t.bra;i• ..}.ixrititer,. •i , •5,:°,rat,.�=, .�s-f7-.,.:...J•s,.,,r s 4» aOre.i• i •,..tlt�. I • • +4 td •- `, 1•cA::_.•• • ••zr�N ,r rt-r^ 1� i• • ' ., :'•Ir ' IS WITNESS WICRE0r, the parting L.i:atG have executed t•*-, y; 4•714 I ._ .r�„ -v n•^.i •ti•. +• the foceQuinq ingtrusene as of the day and year first ahov. w=.• + b t (}=' �!i�j' SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION L - ,f r • rIrr R y --� r 42' ----...�� 14.•r.4.44,1 ::_,'=i1. '°r apal•i 'cr ;. -C)corm '''- • ..,4 W„Ci.4i'..'. 11T9'88 BY U { - • O.;',r ' Cy. 1' eL ...41 al . ':] :"mac :{ TRIAD UT1H, a Utah corporation ....p....:....;:r...7......77...,....::: .;,; a.,. >M Q:pis, yry 1 r t` r�r� ' • '' -- --,.:-.400v.;-- 4e Blea..._/-...---•----•--------""--0 G---\-7.2%---- • �„ . +j�r r A ii;1 r 4 5ThT:: OF UTAH ) _ +�� {r.P;Tr^s .) COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) "- •r' y •r L ' ,�' ;.t,i:. an the I44:1A day of �. !1r , 1982. personally ':_,:. ` ' :,.', ^wCr`'r:� -:,�.' - -,,;Iti appee.ed be:ore me TED L. utISON (g4nC KJITIIHYN NAHSHI.LL, who being by as duly •:-f==:i' 4 •�; =' j"• acorn, 11,1 ea that theyaro thu ' a'or and CityRecorder, respectively, of • I r':1 - s,..y.= Y ! :t;?� �,, �••'^�;` SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a municipal corporation of the State of Ltah, pyLr 14'4;4 ,r s ',risyt.:0:e. and 's4jd,.,pereona acknowledged to me that said corporation ax.cuted the same. • • hr.• -;: •..W1 AITVC,A) h! f/ 1 t +il I.V .�;. • u .te !r ire . t • �. - ;'ji1`•u •,0_''�•!f.;- - N7LIC, reaiding in Calt Lake ;. • 'Sfb'�i .r, . County, Utah tJ' w} ''f My,Camisslon P.apirenr 5 •..'f.ik tier-. e •si. 1% " •✓ r•. eir. f.! III\ 4 _' rE: " ;`h.• , •, '` -•I:r;;` COUNTY Or HALT LAKE ) v ••_•- -••��:. gip, .: �Ry--:./.:'=:' '!;>r ' ,,'""' ypersonally a ared befog• w Emanuel A. Floor``^ ,, On the lath da of May, 19B7, yappeared :▪t;+l ?� _., . C j. F. and Patricia Davis, who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the ,. r i 7' :i President and Assistant Secretary of TRIAD UTAH, a Utah corporation, and tnat the i�w+ �',,'-' • � '•S•(''' loco I • �'' -�-•••• ,•, going instrument was signed In behalf of said corporation by authority of a ;j.rP a �?I a .", �0t_ resolution of its board of dizectorar and said persona :oknowledged to me that ;,,,1 Sri n., wsc"r.1S{'` j ..'�;,f .;!t Y said ttlrpor'ation executed the same. >'3 ,...,,,„,;!,,.::, . C jpy jlj$', r t 1. t • r L 1r R: 'ir• �. • �1OTAAY PUBLIC, residing in * • e' • !. Salt Zak. `fi,,..• 5 ��j. ,'. ij. Ry.eeerraission Expired, North �y • � >w i.,. ti. . /-/0•A•� .'i.i v 7. 4 1� • • `'>t, .Y.,`....� ^emu :. t 'f' /I,,fyt "En ,4; 4• I.t. .4 1`t.•..`• �i-i��1+,1 ••','4. J " �: • Y'1 •ir II a•.:4',rr. TS ,::. ., ,,. •.. ,A 1 I. . ,, SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Adopting the Amended "Triad Center Master Plan" for Blocks 79 , 84 and 85 ) AN ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10-9-21 , UTAH CODE ANNOTATED, 1953 ADOPTING THE AMENDED "TRIAD CENTER MASTER PLAN" FOR BLOCKS 79 , 84 AND 85 . WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, has held public hearings before its own body and before the Planning Commission and received input from the affected community councils and others and believes it appropriate to adopt the amended "Triad Center Master Plan" for Blocks 79, 84 and 85 . NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah : SECTION 1 . That the amended "Triad Center Master Plan" for Blocks 79 , 84 and 85 recommended for adoption by the Salt Lake City Planning Commission on April 5, 1990 is hereby adopted pursuant to Section 10-9-21, Utah Code Annotated, 1953 as amended. The City Recorder is hereby directed to retain a certified copy of the amended "Triad Center Master Plan" for Blocks 79 , 84 and 85 which is hereby incorporated by reference. SECTION 2 . This Ordinance shall take effect upon its first publication . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990 . CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ay CITY RECORDER %" / Transmitted to the Mayor on I;. Mayor' s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER BRB:cc