The URL can be used to link to this page

04/12/2011 - Work Session - Minutes PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH WORK SESSION TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2011 The City Council met in Work Session on Tuesday, April 12, 2011, at 7 :41 p.m. in Room 326, Committee Room, City County Building, 451 South State Street. In Attendance: Council Members Carlton Christensen, Van Turner, Jill Remington Love, JT Martin, Stan Penfold, Luke Garrott and Soren Simonsen. Also In Attendance : Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director; Mayor Ralph Becker; Lynn Pace, Deputy City Attorney; Lehua Weaver, Council Policy Analyst/Constituent Liaison; Jeffrey Niermeyer, Public Utilities Deputy Director; Tom Ward, Public Utilities Deputy Director; Jim Lewis, Public Utilities Finance Administrator; Frank Gray, Community and Economic Development Director; Neil Lindberg, Council Legal Director; Bianca Shreeve, Mayor' s Assistant Chief of Staff; and Scott Crandall, Deputy City Recorder. Councilmember Love presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7 :41 p.m. AGENDA ITEMS #1. 8:46:43 PM REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INCLUDING A REVIEW OF COUNCIL INFORMATION ITEMS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. View Attachments See File M 11-5 for announcements . #2 . RECEIVE AN UPDATE FROM THE ADMINISTRATION REGARDING THE SALT LAKE CITY STREETCAR PROJECT. View Attachments Item was not held. #3. 8:24:08PM RECEIVE A FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING REGARDING AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE CITY'S ZONING REGULATIONS TO PROHIBIT NEW ELECTRONIC BILLBOARDS AND REGULATE CHANGING EXISTING BILLBOARDS TO AN ELECTRONIC FORMAT. RELATED PROVISIONS OF TITLE 21A - ZONING MAY ALSO BE AMENDED AS PART OF THIS PETITION. PETITION PLNPCM2010-000717 - MAYOR RALPH BECKER. (ITEM D1) View Attachments Frank Gray and Neil Lindberg briefed the Council with the attached handouts . Discussion was held on the review process, indoor/outdoor signs, on-off premise signs and applications/permits . Mr. Gray said the goal was to complete the review process within nine months . He said the City would work with the sign industry, manufacturers and users to develop criteria that he hoped could be 11 - 1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH WORK SESSION TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2011 incorporated into the larger billboard/sign regulations currently being reviewed by the Planning Commission (PC) . Councilmember Martin asked for more information. Mr. Gray said there were a number of issues which required additional information/research including dwell/change times, illumination and impact on residential areas . He said the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) study needed to be reviewed when it was released later this year. He said the study dealt with perceived/real hazards of digital billboards on federal highways . He said the Administration would come back to the PC and Council with recommendations/refinements . #4 . RECEIVE AN UPDATE FROM THE ADMINISTRATION REGARDING SALT LAKE CITY' S HEALTH INSURANCE BENEFITS. CURRENT AND FUTURE PLANS FOR ADDRESSING THE CITY' S HEALTH PLAN DEFICIT AND RISING HEALTH COSTS WILL BE DISCUSSED DURING THE BRIEFING. View Attachments Item was not held. #5. 7:42:42 PM RECEIVE A BRIEFING RELATING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ANNUAL BUDGET, INCLUDING THE WATER, STORM WATER AND SEWER UTILITY FUNDS, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 . View Attachments Jeffrey Niermeyer, Jim Lewis, Tom Ward and Lehua Weaver briefed the Council with a PowerPoint presentation and the attached handouts . Discussion was held on the Watershed Purchase Fund. Ms . Gust-Jenson said this was an issue for the Council to hold a public policy discussion. Discussion was held on leaking water values/pipes . Mr. Niermeyer said current leakage was between 10-15% and the goal was to reduce that to 10% or lower. He said a study on this subject was available which he would provide to the Council . Discussion was held on paperless billings . Mr. Lewis said that option was currently available but a better job needed to be done to educate the public . Discussion was held on potential flooding issues . Mr. Niermeyer said there were several areas where ground water was impacting residents in Rose Park and Glendale. He said a meeting was scheduled with his staff to address problems/concerns . Councilmember Love said a time would be scheduled for Mr. Niermeyer to update the Council on water/flooding issues . 11 - 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH WORK SESSION TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2011 #6. RECEIVE AN OVERVIEW OF THE 2011 STATE LEGISLATIVE SESSION. Item was not held. #7 . HOLD A DISCUSSION ON AN APPROPRIATION RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ONE-YEAR ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR 2011-2012 THAT INCLUDES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING, HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM (HOME) FUNDING, EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANT (ESG) FUNDING, AND HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PERSONS WITH AIDS (HOPWA) FUNDING AND APPROVING AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) . View Attachments Item was not held. #8. 8:06:50PM CONSIDER A MOTION TO ENTER INTO CLOSED SESSION, IN KEEPING WITH UTAH CODE § 52-4-204, FOR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES: a) A STRATEGY SESSION TO DISCUSS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE § 52-4-205 (1) (b) ; b) A STRATEGY SESSION TO DISCUSS THE PURCHASE, EXCHANGE OR LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY (INCLUDING ANY FORM OF WATER RIGHT OR WATER SHARES) WHEN PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF THE TRANSACTION WOULD DISCLOSE THE APPRAISAL OR ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION OR PREVENT THE CITY FROM COMPLETING THE TRANSACTION ON THE BEST POSSIBLE TERMS PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE § 52-4-205 (1) (d) ; c) A STRATEGY SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING OR REASONABLY IMMINENT LITIGATION PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE § 52-4-205 (1) (c) ; d) A STRATEGY SESSION TO DISCUSS THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (INCLUDING ANY FORM OF WATER RIGHT OR WATER SHARES) IF (1) PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF THE TRANSACTION WOULD DISCLOSE THE APPRAISAL OR ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION OR PREVENT THE CITY FROM COMPLETING THE TRANSACTION ON THE BEST POSSIBLE TERMS, (2) THE CITY PREVIOUSLY GAVE NOTICE THAT THE PROPERTY WOULD BE OFFERED FOR SALE, AND (3) THE TERMS OF THE SALE ARE PUBLICLY DISCLOSED BEFORE THE CITY APPROVES THE SALE; AND e) FOR ATTORNEY-CLIENT MATTERS THAT ARE PRIVILEGED PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE § 78B-1-137 . Councilmember Martin moved and Councilmember Penfold seconded to enter into Closed Session. A roll call vote was taken. Council Members Christensen, Turner, Penfold, Love, Garrott, Martin and Simonsen voted aye. See file M 11-2 for Sworn Statement and recording. The meeting adjourned at 8 : 52 p.m. 11 - 3 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH WORK SESSION TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2011 it P .:„....k r/ / - A/I ‘1, ;1 / t LA/-1-C/Cj •U.;\ COUNCIL CHAIR `tret �i�:is.4` « d ..j'[ TF j*I (---) I RECORD . This document along with the digital recording constitute the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held April 12, 2011 . Sc 11 - 4 5 \4/2 glitY1 URN ae IIO j OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL PLEASE NOTE: A general public comment period will not be held this evening.This is the Council's monthly scheduled briefing night.Housekeeping action items are included,however. Salt Lake City Council AGENDA City Council Chambers City& County Building 451 South State Street,Room 315 Salt Lake City,Utah Tuesday,April 12, 2011 7:00 p.m. A. WORK SESSION 4:30 p.m. or immediately following the 2:00 p.m.Redevelopment Agency Meeting in Room 326,City & County Building,451 South State St. (Agenda items scheduled during the Council's Formal Meeting may be discussed during the Work Session.Items from the following list that Council is unable to complete in Work Session from approximately 4:30 p.m.—6:30 p.m.will be addressed in a Work Session setting following the Consent Agenda.) 1. Report of the Executive Director,including a review of Council information items and announcements. 2. (TENTATIVE)The Council will receive an update from the Administration regarding the Salt Lake City Streetcar Project. 3. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing regarding an ordinance changing the City's zoning regulations to prohibit new electronic billboards and regulate changing existing billboards to an electronic format. Related provisions of Title 21A—Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition PLNPCM2010-000717—Mayor Ralph Becker. (Item D 1) 4. The Council will receive an update from the Administration regarding Salt Lake City's Health Insurance Benefits. Current and future plans for addressing the City's health plan deficit and rising health costs will be discussed during the briefing. 5. The Council will receive a briefing relating to the Department of Public Utilities annual budget, including the water, storm water and sewer utility funds,for Fiscal Year 2011-2012. 6. (TENTATIVE)The Council will receive an overview of the 2011 State Legislative Session. 7. The Council will hold a discussion on an appropriation resolution adopting the One-Year Annual Action Plan for 2011-2012 that includes Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) funding, Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funding,Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) funding, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funding and approving an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD). CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH S41 1 1 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH B41 14-5476 TELEPHONE: B01-S35-7600 FAX: 1301-535-7651 WWW.SLCGOV.COM/COUNCIL EMAIL: COUNCIL.COMMENTS@SLCGOV.COM LT.aec.ceo P..Pca Salt Lake City Council Agenda Tuesday,April 12,2011 8. (TENTATIVE) The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session, in keeping with Utah Code § 52-4-204, for any of the following purposes: a)A strategy session to discuss collective bargaining, pursuant to Utah Code § 52-4-205 (1)(b); b)A strategy session to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property(including any form of water right or water shares)when public discussion of the transaction would disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration or prevent the City from completing the transaction on the best possible terms, pursuant to Utah Code § 52- 4-205(1)(d); c)A strategy session to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation,pursuant to Utah Code § 52-4-205(1)(c); d)A strategy session to discuss the sale of real property(including any form of water right or water shares) if(1)public discussion of the transaction would disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration or prevent the City from completing the transaction on the best possible terms, (2)the City previously gave notice that the property would be offered for sale, and(3)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the City approves the sale; e)For attorney-client matters that are privileged, pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137; and f)A strategy session to discuss deployment of security personnel, devices or systems pursuant to Utah Code Section 52-4-205(1)(f). B. OPENING CEREMONY: (None) Aloft, C. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (None) D. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Electronic Billboards Consider adopting an ordinance changing the City's zoning regulations to prohibit new electronic billboards and regulate changing existing billboards to an electronic format. Related provisions of Title 21 A—Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition PLNPCM2010- 000717—Mayor Ralph Becker. (O 11-7) Staff Recommendation: Consider options. 7 Salt Lake City Council Agenda Tuesday,April 12, 2011 E. COMMENTS: (None) F. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Federal Transit Administration(FTA) Grant,Downtown Streetcar Alternatives Analysis Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the filing of applications with the Federal Transit Administration; an operating administration of the United States Department of Transportation, for Federal Transportation Assistance authorized by 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53,Title 23 United States Code, and other Federal statutes administered by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Resolution will authorize the filing of applications with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA)for the Downtown Streetcar Alternatives Analysis. (R 11-5) Staff Recommendation: Suspend the rules and adopt. G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: (None) H. CONSENT: (None) 3 Salt Lake City Council Agenda Tuesday,April 12, 2011 I. ADJOURNMENT: Dated: April 7, 2011 I By: . . Pspoi-1r City Recor er/ STATE OF UTAH ) ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) On or before 5:00 p.m. on April 7,2011,I also personally(1)posted a copy of the foregoing on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2)provided a copy of the foregoing to The Salt Lake Tribune or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent. 0"1 . , Record r i Subscribe. . d .worn to .- ore m- this ' day of April, 2011. ' ;. �=' SCOTT C. CRANDALLAsk � d L ` 7 _. ,, NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF UTAH 451 SO.STATE STREET, RM 415 N• ary Public residing in the State of Utah LAK E KE CITY,UT'84111 My Comm.Exp.06/27/2011 1 Approval: ( -a.-/,,Z.C_ 8.4_,„; De uty Di(ector Access agendas at http://www.slcgov.com/council/agendas/default.htm. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance of council meetings. We make every effort to honor these requests, and they should be made as early as possible. Accommodations may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids. The City and County Building is an accessible facility.For questions or additional information, please contact the City Council Office at 535-7600, or TDD 535-6021. Assistive listening devices are available on Channel I; upon four hours advance notice. Please allow 72 hours advance notice for sign language interpreters; large type and#2 Braille agendas. *Final action may be taken and/or adopted concerning any item on this agenda.After 5:00 p.m., please enter the City& County Building through the east entrance. Accessible route is located on the east side of the building. In accordance with State Statute, City Ordinance and Council Policy, one or more Council Members may be connected via speakerphone. 4 SW COUNCIL OFFICE RALPH BECKER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECEIVJ - . R CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER OF SALT LAKE CITY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MAR 182011 Salt Lake City Mayor CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: L` 3/ / 12.PJ Davi veritt, C ief of Staff Date Sent to City Council: As/ 21 ( 7,,e) TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: March 17, 2 11 Jill Love, Chair FROM: D.J. Baxter Redevelopment Agency Director SUBJECT: Salt Lake City Streetcar Projects Update STAFF CONTACT: D.J. Baxter, at 801-535-7735 or dj.baxter@slcgov.com ACTION REQUIRED: None—briefing only. DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing. BUDGET IMPACT: To be determined. Minimum $4,500,000 DISCUSSION: Issue Origin: This will be a verbal update by the Administration regarding the Downtown and Sugar House streetcar projects. Additional detail will be provided in the presentation (copy attached) regarding next steps and funding needs for the Sugar House streetcar project. The project partners— Salt Lake City, South Salt Lake, and Utah Transit Authority—are meeting regularly to resolve outstanding issues on the project, negotiate an Interlocal Agreement, and prepare the project for construction. The project will require significant matching funds from both cities, both for construction and for ongoing operating costs, which UTA is currently unable to cover with its existing revenues. It is also important to note that the funding contemplated thus far, including the federal TIGER II award of$26 million, will cover only the streetcar line itself. The two cities are preparing to launch a public visioning process to identify any improvements needed in the entirety of the corridor to facilitate the PRATT trail and other public activity, and to provide an amenity that will help to stimulate private investment along the corridor. The cities and UTA will need to develop a separate budget for the construction and maintenance of these improvements. 451 SOUTH STATE, ROOM 418 SCANNED TO. PO Box 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114 SCANNED BY: rA-Dt- TELEPHONE: 80 1-535-724❑ FAX: 801•535-7245 WWW.SLCRDA.COM DATE: �� r&dli [�, RECYCLED PAPER r 3/17/2011 • Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS SALT LAKE CITY STATE OF STREETCARS March 2011 1110 Alit-,;A Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS STREETCARS then... .... SALT LAKE CITY " ' 'e;S'9LetC i.. :`: • i eon ,1.,,0,.. . e W�, v t.,1,ll.. Lei CI(L _. _ - 3g ti. a a� r'n: •ram C c °. /aa R .,:hire ill=. a g;f . ii•IMMUS�Fea nrl Jp'. a,,nlr,1E - 9 -E� 16•i8'g LI`_�— lir rl urr k01, 1r 1 ,5 o 0 A. 4- *-: ,F 1, ., -_ _ �._ ___...gyp 1E ... r j • ! r,..,... l• II r •' of 4 , r ,yr *Bin liga I! øI rTcf a WA' • ammi 3/17/2011 • =' Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS ..ate... STREETCARS now... South Davis Streetcar a RI 'A rt � .61 r .. • S�A�atP-H .'.°T.' �• _ sruct r , . p SUGAR MOUSE - CO•IMUIUr♦ Salt Lake City Irmin STATE OF STREETCARS GUIDING PRINCIPLES • Advancing City goals for livable, sustainable community • Advance City land use goals • Catalyze increased development in multiple neighborhoods • Expandability of initial routes to Citywide system • Building transit ridership to support multi- modal goals • Complementary system to light rail and commuter rail • Provide circulation and distribution 2 3/17/2011 Salt Lake City ___________________________TATE OF STREETCARS SOUTH DAVIS STREETCAR Y tY. _-- 11.1.171 1_I I 1 I;11 - ""'"ouggismolom. lima; Salt Lake City AWL_ STATE OF STREETCARS SOUTH DAVIS STREETCAR A •Salt Lake City to Centerville •Planning process lead by UTA •Salt Lake City participated through the process— alignment is planned for 40o West connecting to the Intermodal Hub •Alternatives Analysis complete in 2008 •Draft State Environmental Impact Statement completed in 2010 •Community sentiments are mixed •Timeline is unknown;not a"fast-track"project • • 3/17/2011 Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS DOWNTOWN STREETCAR pr Y Y y.y ?Ywr GEMYE '"410116,7 lye`3Yr• '�' :-R• i • Salt La City STATE OF STREETCARS DOWNTOWN STREETCAR context • Study area includes Soo East to 600 ,p,-;! West,and from North Temple to i'- 90o South • Initial feasibility study began with — `° Y = Planning Division recommendations for routing and Y q ; expanded analysis ;d z, • Goals for redevelopment and • :» t livability in the downtown area 1 04° ...:, OT. ... ' 4 3/17/2011 0 ,s Salt Lake City I F4 `,' STATE OF STREETCARS DOWNTOWN STREETCAR process • City Streetcar Committee guided the feasibility study,with UTA participation. • Extensive outreach and discussion with the following groups: • University of Utah • Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints • Granary District Business Owners • Downtown Alliance • Salt Lake City Planning Commission • Salt Lake City Transportation Advisory Board • Community Councils • Study Area Stakeholders-Focus Groups • Wasatch Front Regional Council • Transportation Agencies(UDOT, UTA) • RDA Advisory Committee interim and final presentations • RDA Board interim and final presentations 0 4 ,C ► Salt Lake City t STATE OF STREETCARS DOWNTOWN STREETCAR alignments considered 1 � , .. >: . ) ,, ,. T ,..., ,i4 -...,- „,-„,...,..-.:1;.,,,,„:,,,,:..„. . .• _ .. _ _ , ,,.., ,,, r_ ._„ t , ,,,, , ,,,,,t----. ii .:,..,. _...... . , ... .,., ._ , Mil ,-_,-,, - . . 5 3/17/2011 • Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS DOWNTOWN STREETCAR financial analysis Granary One Hybrid Line Extended Beginning of Year5 Year 11 Year5 Year 11 A.Capital Costs: S t9.1 5 49 1 S 76.8 S 76.3 • Completed as part of the feasibility study and B.Maximum Local Resources: 5 22.5 S 14.6 5 75.0 S 106.3 Assessment District at 2.5 cents S 1.7 $ 2.5 $ 5.8 S 7.3 considers an initial set of TIF20%of Existing 5 0.4 $ 0.4 $ 31.8 $ 31.8 TIF l ncrease at 30%cr available' S 9.9 $ 26.0 $ 13.3 $ 33.7 alignment options Higher Public Parking Revenues•• 5 - $ - $ 9.1 S 11.4 • Considers all possible Monetize❑ re tv/RDA Rede,eloo-nt Sites S 10.5 5 12 8 S 15.0 > 22.5 (Deficit)/Surolus[A•B] (526.61 154.51 (SL8) $30.0 financing options • Lead to the decision to 200 South Hybrid Short pursue federal funding Beginning of Year Year 11 Year5 Year11 A.Capital Costs: i 61.1 ; 61.1 S 61.1 $ 61.1 B.Maximum Local Resources: 69.6 S 101.6 S 74.8 5 106.4 Assessment District at 25 cents $ 5.4 $ 7.2 $ 5.7 $ 7.2 11F20%of Existing $ 31.5 $ 315•$ 31.8 $ 31.8 TIF',.crease at 30%ot available. $ 14.6 $ 38.0 $ 13.2 $ 33.4 Higher Public Parking Revenues.. $ 9.1 $ 11.4 $ 9.1 $ 11.4 Monetize City/RDA Redevelaornent Sites $ 9.0 $ 13.5 5 15.0 5 225 (Deficit]/Surplus[A-8] $8.5 S40.5 S13.7 545.3 •50%in Granary One area • .crease sr All oubl:c spaces'n Ohl • I�.$)-1r.Yn Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS DOWNTOWN STREETCAR zoning analysis Recommendations: • Re-zoning from CG to a more urban zone • Use North Temple form-based approach • Raise height limits • Remove minimum lot sizes • No setbacks; require build-to lines • Prohibit drive-through facilities • Enhance design requirements • Require ground-floor uses on more streets • Create mid-block streets • Implement parking maximums • Eliminate required parking minimums • Prohibit new surface parking lots in the core area • Provide bonuses or other incentives for redevelopment of existing surface parking lots 6 I 3/17/2011 0 Salt Lake City _ - STATE OF STREETCARS DOWNTOWN STREETCAR near term recommendation �r1. • Serve established areas of downtown to create immediate 1� , •: ridership ,.. .O _ N• Serve Depot District to catalyze • redevelopment ; •o�.. >„iiii ;y - • Plan for extension into Granary fKa, , 411 . °• .. District ;--- , Y t' • • Re-evaluate and verify during AA `'. • Range of cost 44-6oM '" '°0.4. ° ,. y i" • uuw el w.i... � IK lk µ l 0 rr Salt Lake City ,< �, STATE OF STREETCARS DOWNTOWN STREETCAR longer term recommendation • Extend to the Granary District on r .� s' • 40o West .. • Connection to goo South TRAX ' """ "O "' �., . • Use signalized intersections at 500 --b; .. �Y4.' and 600 South _., °""°' .. T a -. f • Re-evaluate and verify during AA • Range of cost 25-3o M om .� , r r 1.' 0 ..._._....L. .i — idie 3/17/2011 410 ". ?; Salt Lake City t: ,'�,='l STATE OF STREETCARS DOWNTOWN STREETCAR timeline and next steps ,eiao e< ot\L¢ac�\eN \a,.�`_es, ,c�S��d� <e ,4e$ e�'ca\ `off Qoa 5 P c< \ e v t (-\2' 0ePS odd F° �e4.-' p��e��\I S��i��S�� OeS�9n Co�s��0c ® 0 0 0 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 Critical issues to be resolved: • Alternatives Analysis—management of grant • Inte,:ace with bicycle community • Continue to involve stakeholders • Work together with DFCM to further efforts on near-term alignments near the Rio Grande building ter° �.. Salt Lake City n 4T\ r<mJ � ism.‘---.5 4 STATE OF STREETCARS STREETCARS SALT LAKE CITY STREETCAR in the future... ... w •b flip Po wv!♦!T► .b . .l__ - . ri 1 45 WAR o,....,M .... el l � 0 8 3/17/2011 . ,t,`Z;q Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS STREETCARS in the future...... -. - y�,... dam,,.,,., ` :,-. .` 400 Lu' 1L " 1\_\\\ a \ .,.. • Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS SUGAR HOUSE STREETCAR =.----o O 9 3/17/2011 >. �._�.. _.'- 8 SUGAR HOUSE STREETCAR context Eggik •2 miles long,connection between TRAX Light Rail - and Sugar House Business District and ' __ • neighborhood •Capital cost of$55 M,located in an existing rail right-of-way,owned by UTA ^�- •Estimated 3000 daily riders in 2012(1500 new to system)and all with direct connection to over 130 miles of existing and planned rail transit 1 Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS SUGAR HOUSE STREETCAR description •Single track initially,with enough space to double track as demand grows and capacity is needed •For the short term,three Siemens S70 vehicles will be used �^1. to serve the line in single-car configuration. • •Slow speeds throughout the '" corridor;this is a neighborhood transit service 10 3/17/2011 Pe{-'IN Salt Lake City ‘ - • ; STATE OF STREETCARS SUGAR HOUSE STREETCAR development LEGEND Id Q Approved Plana it Future Plana = i8 -E -g 5 �$ ;_ 1 'n _ -AphApartm.nt Sat Lek. 9 Lousy CampNs 1 •nre InNa G'irs Poet WeebnirreltR I tEl South Sall Lake Warns- e sabre prt _ R It arY� I'MxWUM Future Plans• St Arras ! ~ \ 1Wrilmin ton y y Kim.Use School Property Under COMMMb jdn Garden UTA RIGHTOF-WAY r .• . . . . . S „rp„� �1 X a, Boys&Gins CIA., Park I Fawn,.Park 8 2 D'Ambrosio PropertyDef. Residential Project Aquabq Canter' Prope I 80 Forest Dal. 4 e Sohn Selz La. 1 Golf Course CM Hall E on gin.*Center REDEVELOPMENT PLANS F:.r'.a EE;: AND ACTIVITY CENTERS 0 -. Salt Lake City 17<1 ' ^' STATE OF STREETCARS SUGAR HOUSE STREETCAR public concern • Noise and vibration impacts • Crime in Fairmont Park • Secondary impacts such as on-street illall lag parking i' • Bus routing(many comments unrelated to streetcar) s • Why not bus? 4111) 11 3/17/2011 %, Salt Lake City �" '`'``' STATE OF STREETCARS • SUGAR HOUSE STREETCAR timeline and next steps �,,110 av ts‘e F`�a v\ PSSe `�'e G° Oe k.. •- • • 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Critical issues to be resolved: •Vision for the corridor *Operating costs 'Capital funding gap of$6.2 M •Final design for the corridor, including street crossings,trail, public spaces •Interlocal Agreement: SLC, South Salt Lake, UTA • ;24 Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS YAQ • Vision for the Corridor — Process similar to North Temple • Community Workshops • Individual Stakeholder Interviews • Professional Outreach to ULI, APA, AIA, ASLA • Land Use & Urban Design Analysis & Recommendation • Zoning Recommendation — Study Entire Corridor — share process and cost with South Salt Lake City • 12 3/17/2011 ''4., Salt Lake City • STATE OF STREETCARS • Annual Operating Costs: Total Operating/Maintenance Cost: $1,500,000 Potential Sources of Funds Farebox Revenue $375,000 Salt Lake City $375,000 South Salt Lake $375,000 UTA $375,000 • Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS • Annual Operating Costs, p. 2 Vehicle Lease from UTA $800,000 Potential Sources Salt Lake City $400,000 South Salt Lake $400,000 Total Annual Funds Needed City Share O&M $375,000 City Share Vehicle Lease $400,000 Total Annual City Funds Needed $775,000 13 3/17/2011 • Salt Lake City frg3STATE OF STREETCARS • Capital Costs (Streetcar Line Only) Guideway and Track Elements $5,400,000 Stations $1,140,000 Sitework $12,320,000 Systems $8,900,000 Right-of-way $700,000 Professional Services $2,720,000 Unallocated Contingency $6,000,000 Total Cash Needed: $37,180,000 Right-of-Way(owned by UTA) $6,300,000 3 Vehicles(owned by UTA) $12,000,000 Total Project Budget: $55,480,000 • Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS • Capital Costs (Corridor Improvements) — Design and Cost to be determined by Community Visioning Process 411 14 3/17/2011 • Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS • Sources and Funding Gap: USDOT TIGER II Grant $26,000,000 Salt Lake City-Cash Commitment $2,500,000 South Salt Lake-Cash Commitment $2,500,000 UTA Vehicles $12,000,000 UTA Rail Corridor $6,300,000 Total Sources: $49,300,000 Streetcar Gap to be covered: $6,180,000 C t• Salt Lake City "� STATE OF STREETCARS • Responsibility for Gap: Gap to be covered: $6,180,000 Salt Lake City $2,060,000 South Salt Lake $2,060,000 UTA $2,060,000 15 3/17/2011 Salt Lake City STATE OF STREETCARS • Salt Lake City Gap & Options: Streetcar Only SLC Previous Commitment $2,500,000 Current Gap-SLC Share $2,060,000 TOTAL SLC Cash Needed: $4,560,000 SLC Options: RDA Funds on-hand $700,000 -minus cost of Alt Analysis/Vision -$500,000 RDA Funds Available 200,000 RDA Future Funds @$250,000/year 1,000,000 Possible Assessment District 1,000,000 Sales Tax Bonds 2,360,000 Total SLC Funds: 4,560,000 Gap: 0 4 16 April 7,2011 Electronic Billboards Agenda items:Work Session-A.3 and Potential Action Item-D.1 Petition No.PLNPCM2010-00717-Ordinance changing the City's zoning regulations to prohibit new electronic billboards,to prohibit the conversion of existing billboards to an electronic format,and to regulate any electronic billboards that the City may be required to permit. (This item has been processed under the pending ordinance rules that allow 6 months for new zoning regulations to be adopted. The time limit will expire on April 19,2011) • A Council staff report was not prepared for this item. • The Council received a briefing on March 22,2011 and a follow-up briefing and public hearing on April 5,2011. • On April 5,2011,the Council closed the public hearing and referred action to a future Council meeting. • Based on the Council's discussion and comments provided during the public hearing,a revised ordinance and motions have been prepared for Council consideration. Please see Potential Motions below and highlighted sections of the attached ordinance, pgs.1 and 8,for details. POTENTIAL MOTIONS: 1. ["I move that the Council"] adopt an ordinance amending Section 21A.46.160 of the City Zoning Ordinance to: a. Prohibit new electronic billboards; b. Prohibit the conversion of existing billboards to an electronic format; c. Amend terms defining billboards and their physical characteristics; d. Add standards regulating the motion,display time,brightness,and dimmer controls on any electronic billboards the City may be required to permit;and e. Requiring an owner and/or operator of an electronic sign to file an annual report with the City certifying compliance with electronic sign requirements. I further move that the Council work to refine billboard regulations and reevaluate the time, place,and manner in which all billboards,including electronic billboards,may be permitted in the City by taking the following actions within nine months: a. Reviewing all billboard regulations in light of recommendations transmitted from the Planning Commission pursuant to Petition Nos.PLNPCM2010-00717(electronic billboards)and PLNPCM2010-00032(outdoor billboards); b. Inviting public comment and scheduling one or more hearings regarding possible amendments to electronic and other billboard regulations; • c. Taking final action on any revised billboard regulations within the nine month period. April 7,2011 2. ["I move that the Council") Adopt an ordinance changing the City's zoning regulations to prohibit new electronic billboards,to prohibit the conversion of existing billboards to an electronic format,. and to regulate any electronic billboards that the City may be required to permit,as recommended by the City Administration and Planning Commission. 3. ["I move that the Council"] Not adopt an ordinance changing the City's zoning regulations to prohibit new electronic billboards,the conversion of existing billboards to an electronic format, and regulating any electronic billboards the City may be required to permit. HB AiTY-#17422-vl-Motion Elxtronic Billboards SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2011 (An ordinance amending Section 21A.46.160 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to billboards) An ordinance amending section 21A.46.160 of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2010-00717 regarding the regulation of billboards. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission("Planning Commi , o `'� public hearings on January 26, 2011 and February 23, 2011 to consider a re a ade .y Mayor Ralph Becker("Applicant") (Petition No. PLNPCM2010-00717)to am��,� t of Section 21A.46.160 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Signs: Billboar ' , ,+'4 1 the regulation of electronic billboards; and WHEREAS, at its March 9, 2011 public meeting,"4° - .� anning Commission recommended that the Salt Lake City Council o cil") amend Section 21A.46.160 of the Salt Lake City Code as set forth herein; . R 4 u,„w: s � $€j s..a'tfi:" =a ��'Y x:>• ;''tt �4a x: �-�~ -..'-Wit.-•,,�; 9h";:.?";.•:x••,�r'�s`x � dwr- a A.. 9 l� `6 v e� yy x! • °q �f gam. ��gx ��'hr: .•�i".'$^^� .d.�.�`ty. � � '** i R *; r1.--:' �: ' :*; r£ !mod; .�<_ -.ax Z`�.•e ,'y, ,t < ;..—i"i'.�t •�t�$ .t .. . ,,,,ti"i' 't' .+ ..''.",+:: -, ` •Sa,t. { :'T W..A.,.;t:,'nx ih e> w. ,<. . :- , . r. .- a:-. r': : a- .: ..a. .0' ' ex: " '��'f."<.^:';'. ;: `:`.' A' ,, w;.• .: s-AigIt'".. ir 'R 'tee € ":5, . ... : . fig-._ .:� _:.:. :3 :�s ��. �<t« 2 :;�.>.�;-�;= �-.:. M .0 ,., �, *.�" *,:g ice. -3 '..., ,.s' t nZi` a . `I n: •!'1;: r1#r '.' .'itt. } - -�'- . <i�'y.g, x.!... �...^..i :1'� rt:::3: �•1f.. - -^a q .€ f.a g 'l3. T,tJi^3=f �w y�, 3pi.„:,. t �44��7�F:.. sy': a�53 � -..ryj��» '}'.<.';R+o93. `'�"Ax#$�()�§ 6i:.`z ![�a�y.. �gi• :� ��'"!•. M• r 11.4" s r xi'.- " _" - .:a . ••;:a.,.,�f: t' 4:." x G'', ;lea• .1by.. :��:.4,;. . :7�....'�xj � pi�� ;P.��_�.''-:'mt.:t;`.= r:• ��- �.: �>' �� "&t'� ��'� R�eY= Q"9 +i=.� •:$isry�•�,wie *sc,. .. q. .'�:.z, . ' . ..: ;� . ,� � '�, i';: ‘"ip, r,, . e `a s i9' :3 1. j a ° ,�.x� .v: %,,'Pr e :..v"r 's "3: o_ ^;,-- 'i_ ;et «-- �#' {j: ,' " :*,ej +:� u-rr, - - :a;. m• �amv 1:::�:. .:. `1kiu��;:="`- ,. "�': �a"3'�FJ* ir; � �� I¢'YF�GC1f'.��`1�$IST '8 -5t 'On' r�y' > f ..�.6% 4 _ g :-a �' : >., ,,w �."�.;.:1! .emits ti�� d'a. �- -. "dui* .� 1:':'9":' l) tF:." " ^ _ .,.rv:•," t It* Y� ! :,.< <> ; - 4 of 1 i,� x 3 d +i 4� f .0 1,,', s . •y €;^^"'*_,ate- z �4 • A„„ I x y '. 't : Y,. ''TJ ..1, ,4txSg as �y»• "�� 9 �T_ r`i+ li,v<S.,�' � �� : w .r g +'> �.t '��•M ®'4 � �,x€'Z:a3£`d ip=� 9p �e ��' � ^.��i';{ 9 r I � 1C• ate+ Y� fir£ { nu-'rY , /,• ��:;.a wa' =.nf`- ,� :. =, r 'r4044 a:fit�'. ? ei 3£• "•�: '� . rs . s @9 'r# raa. y �� x' � y �.Y � .�t,>��= � f M � 4:��' ;1£�+i 4i�: � t��gxy311" qr,,_ ��1 A ""� �r,,nfi A�+n. - tole t, _ h,fi�,�,,u_ _ , .� ?. � '�� .�� ' • �.� ;1: rE4 ,ni:N,p; I �.' „x-•Y t.,'s* r,--Y -,-,i k" ,»e' ,.;'',"'''° ?.�� .. et�� i x �.�q� qy ,.-�°,f� 'i�� ,t ti ':.>R:' _ Q,y „Yi� ;} ,e}l ' ,i .�:?� < stT'.Yl .fie' �R�,h"'a; .• :�$ `" , <, ,d, ma's a?.`• ,,.a., , '� 'City; and ' " -t . r SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE _ No. of 2011 (An ordinance amending Section 21A.46.160 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to billboards) An ordinance amending section 21A.46.160 of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2010-00717 regarding the regulation of billboards. pR WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission("Planning Commis o public hearings on January 26, 2011 and February 23, 2011 to consider a re. (es made Mayor Ralph Becker("Applicant") (Petition No. PLNPCM2010-00717)to am t *t'of Section 21A.46.160 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Signs: Billboar ' v„.,the regulation of electronic billboards; and WHEREAS, at its March 9,2011 public meeting, anning Commission recommended that the Salt Lake City Council cil") amend Section 21A.46.160 of the Salt Lake City Code as set forth herein; . d " WHEREAS, the Planning C, iss 's presently considering an associated petition (Petition No. PLNPCM2010-0I reg. mg outdoor billboard regulations (the "Associated Billboard Petition") and s not , ansmitted its recommendation to the City Council; and y WHEREA , n t the pending ordinance doctrine, codified in Section 10-9a-509 of the Land Us be to s nt, and Management Act, the City has withheld building permits for electro c b l ads since October 21, 2010 and after April 19, 2011 can no longer do so; and A"6 , AS, enactment of this ordinance will preserve status quo regarding electronic billboards and will allow the City Council the opportunity to receive a recommendation from the Planning Commission regarding the Associated Billboard Petition and to further review the time, place, and manner in which billboards, including electronic billboards, may be permitted in the City; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the City's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code section 21A.46.160. That section 21A.46.160 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Signs: Billboards), shall be, and here is amended to read as follows: w 21A.46.160: BILLBOARDS: A. Purpose Statement: This chapter is intended to limit the ma ' ruiner of billboards in Salt Lake City to no greater than the curren fiis chapter further provides reasonable processes and methods fo e,rep ement or relocation of existing nonconforming billboards to areas of th it i herthey will have less negative impact on the goals and policies of the qity is romote the enhancement of the city's gateways, views, vistas and related urn` esign elements of the city's master plans. s, B. Definitions: BILLBOARD: A freestanding . id si ocated on industrial, commercial or residential property if the si ' des NO or intended to direct attention to a business, product or service that is no so offered or existing on the property where the sign is located. BILLBOARD BAiK: Anccounting system established by the city to keep track of the number andsqu fo'tage of nonconforming billboards removed pursuant to this chapter. ,' BILL O DIT: An entry into a billboard owner's billboard bank account that s Qwhe ber and square footage 1�.w t q t ge of demolished nonconforming billboards. BILBARD OWNER: The owner of a billboard in Salt Lake City. �" DWELL TIME: The length of time that elapses between text, images, or graphics on an electronic sign. EXISTING BILLBOARD: A billboard which was constructed, maintained and in use or for which a permit for construction was issued as of July 13, 1993. ELECTRONIC BILLBOARD: Any off-premise sign, video display,projected image, or similar device with text, images, or graphics generated by solid state electronic 2 components. Electronic signs include,but are not limited to, signs that use light 41w emitting diodes (LED),plasma displays, fiber optics, or other technology that results in bright, high-resolution text, images, and graphics. FOOT CANDLE: the English unit of measurement for luminance, which is equal to one lumen, incident upon an area of one square foot. GATEWAY: The following streets or highways within Salt Lake City: 1. Interstate 80; 2. Interstate 215; 3. Interstate 15; ya _ 4. 4000 West; 5. 5600 West; 6. 2100 South Street from Interstate 15 to East; 7. The 2100 South Expresswa P1 west to the city limit; Arnik 8. Foothill Drive from G W y to Interstate 80; 9. 400 South from L stately/to 800 East; Y �nt 10. 500 South ters ate 15 to 700 East; 11. 600 th fr terstate 15 to 700 East; P" 1 MI6dt om 900 North to 900 South; 1 I h Temple from Main Street to Interstate 80; Main Street from North Temple to 2100 South Street; 15. State Street from South Temple to 2100 South; and 16. 600 North from 800 West to 300 West. NEW BILLBOARD: A billboard for which a permit to construct is issued after December 31, 1993. NONCONFORMING BILLBOARD: An existing billboard which is located in a zoning district or otherwise situated in a way which would not be permitted by the 3 provisions of this chapter. SPECIAL GATEWAY: The following streets or highways within Salt Lake City: 1. North Temple between 600 West and 2200 West; 2. 400 South between 200 East and 800 East; 3. State Street between 600 South and 2100 South; and ,, 3p Fc 4. Main Street between 600 South and 2100 South. I ILLUMINENCE: The intensity of light falling on a subsurface at4dethe.4istance from the source. i. vat ,, MOTION: The depiction of movement or change of po •' io' c44,images, or graphics. Motion shall include, but not be limited to, su e, cts such as dissolving and fading text and images,running sequential text; ra c'brss, lighting that resembles zooming, twinkling, or sparkling, ch. .es In li or color, transitory bursts of light intensity, moving patterns or bands iijht, expanding or contracting shapes, and similar actions. TEMPORARY EMBELLISHMEN An ex n of the billboard resulting in increased square footage as part o a i is design to convey a specific message or advertisement. ' � TWIRL TIME The time it takeslfc,st6tic text, images, and graphics on an electronic sign to change to a diffe; ext, i ages, or graphics on a subsequent sign face. C. Limit On The TothI Numb Of Billboards: No greater number of billboards shall be allowed in SaltLak&Citypihan the number of existing billboards. xg ✓ D. Permit legiured Fo � , iRemoval Of Nonconforming Billboards: z 1'_Permit: Nonconforming billboards may be removed by the billboard owner . iiy=after obtaining a permit for the demolition of the nonconforming . billboard. , 2. Application: Application for demolition shall be on a form provided by the zoning administrator. 3. Fee: The fee for demolishing a nonconforming billboard shall be one hundred eleven dollars ($111.00). E. Credits For Nonconforming Billboard Removal: After a nonconforming billboard is demolished pursuant to a permit issued under subsection D1 of this section, or its 4 successor, the city shall create a billboard bank account for the billboard owner. The account shall show the date of the removal and the zoning district of the demolished nonconforming billboard. The account shall reflect billboard credits for the billboard and its square footage. Demolition of a conforming billboard shall not result in any billboard credit. F. Priority For Removal Of Nonconforming Billboards: Nonconforming billboards shall be removed subject to the following priority schedule: 1. Billboards in districts zoned residential, historic,residential R-MU 4 downtown D-1, D-3 and D-4 shall be removed first; P 2. Billboards in districts zoned commercial CN or CB, or gat. a - ., GGC or GH or on gateways shall be removed second; A 3. Billboards which are nonconforming for any oth r= F a.,; . �be removed last; and 4. A billboard owner may demolish nonco rm g b oards of a lower priority before removing billboards in a higher prio • owever, the billboard credits for removing the lower priority bil o d shall not become effective for use in constructing a new billboard un ' ) inboards specified in subsection Fl of this section, or its succ sso w otal square footage equal to or Amok greater than the lower pri oar , are credited in the billboard owner's billboard bank account illbo owner has no subsection Fl of this section, or its succes non orming billboards, two (2) subsection F2 of this section, or its su ce , ority billboards may be credited in the billboard owner' ' boar ank account to effectuate the billboard credits of a subsection F3 o i ction, or its successor,billboard to allow the constructi4 of a .e billboard. For the purposes of this section, the two (2) highe,priori . bi %.oards credited in the billboard bank account can be used only • ik.t -ctuate the billboard credits for a lower priority billboard. G. Life 'f Billboard Credits: Any billboard credits not used within thirty six (36) mont of their creation shall expire and be of no further value or use except that lower.priority credits effectuated pursuant to subsection F4 of this section, or its suessdr, shall expire and be of no further value or use within sixty(60) months of 4,:, theirihitial creation. H. Billboard Credits Transferable: A billboard owner may sell or otherwise transfer a billboard and/or billboard credits. Transferred billboard credits which are not effective because of the priority provisions of subsection F of this section, or its successor, shall not become effective for their new owner until they would have become effective for the original owner. The transfer of any billboard credits do not extend their thirty six (36)month life provided in subsection G of this section, or its successor. 5 I. Double Faced Billboards: Demolition of a nonconforming billboard that has two (2) advertising faces shall receive billboard credits for the square footage on each face, but only as one billboard. J. New Billboard Construction: It is unlawful to construct a new billboard other than pursuant to the terms of this chapter. In the event of a conflict between this chapter and any other provision in this code, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. K. Permitted Zoning Districts: New billboards may be constructed only in the area identified on the official billboard map. { ` L. New Billboard Permits: 1. Application: Anyone desiring to construct a new billbo40 lle an application on a form provided by the zoning adm' yatot. 'a 2. Fees: The fees for a new billboard construct' p rm ,1iall be: a. Building permit and plan review fe- re ire the uniform building code as adopted bythe city; and b. Inspection tag fees accordjligrtyjne ee schedule or its successor. M. Use Of Billboard Credits: f 1. A new billboard pp sha ply be issued if the applicant has billboard credits of a sufficient n bet of square feet and billboards to allow construction aft% ew billboard. 2. When th .•ermi, 3r the construction of a new billboard is issued, the zoning adnrustra sell deduct from the billboard owner's billboard bank A"a. e square footage of the new billboard; and '6. The number of billboards whose square footage was used to allow the new billboard construction. 3. If the new billboard uses less than the entire available billboard credits considering both the number of billboards and square footage, any remaining square footage shall remain in the billboard bank. N. New Billboards Prohibited On Gateways: Except as provided in subsection 0 of this section, or its successor, no new billboard may be constructed within six hundred feet (600') of the right of way of any gateway. 6 O. Special Gateway Provisions: .. 1. If a nonconforming billboard is demolished within a special gateway, the billboard owner may construct a new billboard along the same special gateway in a zoning district equal to or less restrictive than that from which the nonconforming billboard was removed and subject to subsections P, Q, R and S of this section, provided that the size of the new billboard does not exceed the amount of billboard credits in the special gateway billboard bank. 2. The demolition of a nonconforming billboard pursuant to this =ctio ")%iVI not accrue billboard credits within the general billboard bant. dits or a billboard demolished or constructed within a special ga tvca a bet tracked within a separate bank account for each special ,= permit for the construction of a new billboard pursuant to . sectio ust be taken out within thirty six (36)months of the demolit' • conforming billboard. 1y P. Maximum Size: The maximum size of the adve 'sin are °fny new billboard shall not exceed fifteen feet (15') in height and fifty fee in width. Q. Temporary Embellishments: °' , ,, ray f OW 1. Temporary embellishme not'-xceed ten percent (10%) of the 1 .oar , d shall not exceed five feet (5') in height advertising face of gh above the billboar ct 2. No temporary , 11is ent shall be maintained on a billboard more than twelve (12)mon\lit. R. Height: The lest i .Hof any new billboard, excluding temporary embellishments shall not bqmoripthwir =;'1. Fdrty ve feet (45') above the existing grade; or g 4 4 �"If°1 street within one hundred feet(100') of the billboard, measured from the , A°street at the point at which the billboard is perpendicular to the street, is on a •`ib, "`''' different grade than the new billboard, twenty five feet(25') above the pavement elevation of the street. 3. If the provisions of subsection R2 of this section, or its successor subsection, apply to more than one street, the new billboard may be the higher of the two (2) heights. S. Minimum Setback Requirements: All freestanding billboards shall be subject to pole sign setback requirements listed for the district in which the billboard is located. In 7 the absence of setback standards for a particular district, freestanding billboards shall maintain a setback of not less than five.feet(5') from the front or corner side lot line. This setback requirement shall be appled to all parts of the billboard, not just the sign support structure. T. Spacing: 1. Small Signs: Billboards with an advertising face three hundred (300) sq are feet or less in size shall not be located closer than three hundred (30 in feet from any other small billboard or eight hundred feet(800') • • • a billboard on the same side of the street; 2. Large Signs: Billboards with an advertising face greater e + dyed (300) square feet in size shall not be located closer th ed(800) linear feet from any other billboard, small or large he side of the street. 3. Electronic billboards shall not be located ►e•s an teen hundredite(1600)side linear feet from any other electronic bi •o. + on same or oppos of the street s . U. Electronic Billboards: r °• C [ >'3 < 3 + 4 s - ` 9 €.„c. :. _ `"a 1 .: �"F .a$b ',iks,1,33- 1. "F S 1 �' ,$ � . �''L` � 2� S l C{�l �ii:, 7°$ ! i-f'PQ a r x r 'tea s p. x a"' r e ,.. 3 �` ,,,,, d` , ,y^If', y a 4 �Lr ,,.. aTM il . y '� P F a � „ "" ' ! i n ft c Lt:i'l. �.s 'e�..., }�4 " j u s x �� , s °; yak 4, if'� ; .t Nya. Motion Any motion of any kind is prohibited on an electronic sign face. Electronic billboards shall have only static text, images, and graphics. b. Dwell time The text, image, or display on an electronic sign may not change more than once every. twenty four (24) hours. Twirl time between subsequent text, mages, or display shall not exceed 0.25 seconds. 8 the absence of setback standards for a particular district, freestanding billboards shall oflek maintain a setback of not less than five feet(5') from the front or corner side lot line. This setback requirement shall be applied to all parts of the billboard, not just the sign support structure. T. Spacing: 1. Small Signs: Billboards with an advertising face three hundred (300) s• `are feet or less in size shall not be located closer than three hundred (301, in-<r feet from any other small billboard or eight hundred feet (800') . rs billboard on the same side of the street; 2. Large Signs: Billboards with an advertising face greate :dip e ndred (300) square feet in size shall not be located closer th sdred (800) linear feet from any other billboard, small or large he $ side of the street. 3. Electronic billboards shall not be located close, t ' teen hundred (1600) linear feet from any other electronic bipoai�osame or opposite side of the street 1 .4{,. U. Electronic Billboards: 1. New Electronic Billboards ar •``' ! ,ed. ° lectronic billboards constructed or reconstructed for any reaso a r the • .to of the adoption of this ordinance are prohibited. 2. Conversion of Exists :illbo. ds to an electronic format is prohibited. The conversion, remodeli • i- abilitation of any existing billboard to an electronic format after date Q is ordinance is prohibited. 3. Regul. id, : 1 tronic Billboards. If the City is required to allow the cons0 Q en +. •knew electronic billboard, or to allow the conversion of an e sti bi'1 ard to an electronic format, any new or converted electronic ,:bi oard equired to be allowed after the date of this ordinance shall be subject to .( the ;.Ilo ing limitations: a. Motion 'CA,,,, Any motion of any kind is prohibited on an electronic sign face. Electronic billboards shall have only static text, images, and graphics. b. Dwell time The text, image, or display on an electronic sign may not change more than once every twenty four (24) hours. Twirl time between subsequent text, images, or display shall not exceed 0.25 seconds. 8 c. Brightness The illumination of any Electronic Billboard shall not increase the ambient lighting level more than 0.3 foot candles when measured by a foot candle meter perpendicular to the electronic Billboard face at: i. 150 feet for an electronic billboard with a surface are of not more than 242 square feet ii. 200 feet for an electronic billboard with a surface area greater than 242 square feet but not more than 378 square fe ' `�' iii. 250 feet for an electronic billboard with a sur a areaA, eater than 378 square feet but not more than 672Igare ) iv. 350 feet for an electronic billboard with kce- rea greater than 672 square feet. •d. Display period Electronic billboards may not be ill in d Or lit between the hours of midnight. and 6 a.m if they a oc ted ;nor within 600 Feet of, a residential, mixed-use, dow town, ar House Business District, gateway, Neighborhood o ercial, Community Business, or Community Shopping nt onig district, e. Controls i. All ele•4 ni 'llboards shall be equipped with an automatic di -r tro r other mechanism that automatically controls t sign's I f & tness and display period as provided above. ii. Pnxr o •=iproval of any permit for to operate an electronic bil " s d,the applicant shall certify that the sign has been to d and complies with the motion, dwell time, brightness, d other requirements herein. n- it- The owner and/or operator of an electronic billboard shall submit an annual report to the city certifying that the sign complies with the motion, dwell time, brightness, and other requirements herein. A'� 9 - Lanscaping In Residential And Commercial CN And CB Zoning Districts: roperties in any residential zone and commercial CN or CB zones on which a billboard is the only structure shall be landscaped as required by sections 21A.26.020 and 21A.26.030 and chapter 21A.48 of this title, or its successor chapter. No portion of such property shall be hard or gravel surfaced. VW. Landscaping In Other Zoning Districts: Property in all districts other than as specified in subsection US of this section, or its successor subsection, upon which a billboard is the only structure, shall be landscaped from the front of the property to 9 the deepest interior point of the billboard for fifty(50) linear feet along the street frontage distributed, to the maximum extent possible, evenly on each side of the billboard. VAX. Xeriscape Alternative: If all the properties adjacent to and across any street from the property for which billboard landscaping is required pursuant to subsection V of this section, or its successor subsection, are not developed or, if a water line for irrigation does not exist on the property or in the street right of way adjacent to such prop , the zoning administrator may authorize Xeriscaping as an alternative for the uir landscaping. ` XY. Existing Billboard Landscaping: Existing billboards shall comply h ;e landscaping provisions of this section on or before January 1, 1996v -, 1 YZ. Compliance With Tree Stewardship Ordinance: Constructi. em lit' n or maintenance of billboards shall comply with the provisio s Lake City tree stewardship ordinance. e ZAA. Subdivision Registration: To the extent that t lea e or ,ther acquisition of land for the site of a new billboard may be determined subdivision pursuant to state statute no subdivision plat shall be require* `• d the zoning administrator is authorized to approve, make minor subsequent am i o, and record as necessary, such subdivision. AABB. Special Provisions: A3 1. Applicability: The provisions 4 thi section shall apply to specified billboards located: a. Four(4) exi-ill g bil' rds between 1500 North and 1800 North adjacent to the west si,d of -rsti to 15; and b. One ex ing lboard on the east side of Victory Road at approximately 1100 larta . . General Applicability: Except as modified by this section, all other provisions of this chapter shall apply to the five (5) specified billboards. .. . , .Special Priority: The five (5) specified billboards shall be considered as gateway billboards for the purposes of the priority provisions of subsection F of this section, or its successor subsection. 4. Landscaping: The five (5) specified billboards shall be landscaped pursuant to the provisions of subsection VW of this section, or its successor subsection. r 10 ACC. State Mandated Relocation Of Billboards: Except as otherwise authorized herein, existing billboards may not be relocated except as mandated by the requirements of Utah state law. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day gf C.4, , 2011. 1„ C IRP ER '( Ix ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: f. h 4,4 i'''''''44k4 CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on ;°t. . Mayor's Actiog> - 47 i Approved. Vetoed. .e 4 MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2011. Published: . HB ATTY-#17129-N3-Ordinance- Billboard amendments- electronic billboards 11 Item A . 3 please see Item A . 5 from 4 . 5 . 2011 Agenda SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT BUDGET ANALYSIS— FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 DATE: Apri112,2011 SUBJECT: PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Water, Sewer,Stormwater Funds STAFF REPORT BY: Lehua Weaver CC: David Everitt,Jeff Niermeyer,Tom Ward,Jim Lewis,Rusty Vetter,Gordon Hoskins,Gina Chamness,Randy Hillier The Department of Public Utilities has prepared a budget for the Council's review, which includes a combined Operating Expenses and Capital Outlay budget of $137,862,117 for the water, sewer and stormwater funds. Public Utilities Department 2011-12 Water, Sewer, Storm Water Budgets Amended ° *.R15 b tl 2010-11 ' 20'1te;12 ! Difference % Change Revenue &other sources Services Revenue $ 77,402,350 $ 78 609;501 $ 1,207,500 1.6% Interest Income 650,000 600,0067 $ (50,000) -7.7% Impact Fees 1,050,000 1,050,000 g $ 0.0% Bond Proceeds 13,000,000 8,000,000 $ (5,000,000) -38.5% Use of cash reserves & prior bond proceeds 31,734,782 41,519,8652 $ 9,785,083 30.8% Other Various Revenue Sources 4,788,000 8,082,402`.4 $ 3,294,402 68.8% Total revenue &other sources $128,625,132 $137,862,117° $ 9,236,985 7.2% Expenses Salaries, wages & benefits $ 25,189,863 $ 26,128,638; $ 938,775 3.7% Materials & supplies 4,078,555 4,254,695" $ 176,140 4.3% Charges for services 31,668,464 32,416,109 $ 747,645 2.4% Total operating expenses $ 60,936,882 $ 62,799,44Z $ 1,862,560 3.1% Capital improvement 56,428,250 62,865,575 $ 6,437,325 11.4% Vehicles & equipment 4,975,000 5,087,100i' $ 112,100 2.3% Debt Services 6,285,000 7,110,00(5f $ 825,000 13.1% Total Operating Expenses&Capital Outlay $128,625,132 $137,862,11T $ 9,236,985 7.2% SCHEDULE FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION AND PUBLIC PROCESS: February 2011 Proposed Budget was discussed during the Public Utilities Advisory Committee in their February meeting,which is noticed and open to the public. April 12,2011 Council briefing on Department Budget May 3,2011 Mayor presents his recommended budget for Salt Lake City. Administration transmits related budget documents an ordinances to the Council May,June 2011 Annual Budget Public Hearings Council briefings and review of Department budgets, follow-up on budget questions and research June 2011 Adoption of the Annual 2011-12 Budget,including Public Utilities (Adoption date is TBD,but must be complete by June 22 per State Statute) This report lists highlights of the overall Public Utilities Department budget,and then provides a review of information specific to each of the three Utility Funds:Water,Sewer,and Stormwater. OVERALL DEPARTMENT BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS I. Rate & Fee Increases - For 2011-12, the proposed budget does not include any service rate increases,but does include the addition of two fees to support City priorities. a) $0.50 on Water accounts toward the purchase of Watershed Land and Water Rights.This will bring the total monthly fee to $1.50 per water account, and will generate $1.5 million annually in the Water Fund. b) $0.25 per Stormwater billing unit (ERU = equivalent residential unit) dedicated toward riparian corridor projects. This is a new monthly fee and will generate approximately $450,000 annually. (For more information on the calculation of the fee,please refer to the Stormwater Utility write-up below, on page 12. For more information on the uses of the money generated,please refer to the last bullet point in this section"other projects of note" on page 4.) II. Capital Improvement Budget-The three budgets include capital improvement projects totaling $67,952,675. This continues to be an aggressive capital improvement program,and continues to take advantage of a favorable bidding and construction climate.The following larger projects are included: • a) Orange Street sewer trunk line(Sewer Fund):$10 million b) Wastewater Digester Plant covers(Sewer Fund):$3.4 million c) Folsom Avenue Storm drain(Stormwater Fund):$7.5 million d) Water Valve replacement program(Water Fund):$1 million (Refer to each utility's write-up for a more complete list of all the CIP projects.) III. Funding of Capital Improvement Projects- a) $28.5 million of reserve funds (across the three utilities) will be used toward Capital Improvements in the proposed 2011-12 budget. b) $8 million is proposed to be issued in Stormwater revenue bonds to fund the Folsom Avenue Storm Drain project. c) $13 million in previously issued bonds toward Sewer projects d) $3 million in partner contributions toward the Northwest Oil Drain remediation project The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration the plans for bonding, use of cash reserves,and the extent of the capital program in future years.The Department of Public Utilities, • in collaboration with the Council,has intentionally taken advantage of the favorable construction climate to advance necessary infrastructure projects and has undertaken more projects in recent years than would have otherwise been planned.In order to fund those capital projects,the City has drawn considerably on the Department's cash reserves.Although the reserve fund balances were more than adequate and a good source for funding,it is not a sustainable source of funding in the future. The Department's 5-year plan predicts significant reduction in capital projects, to be funded through a combination of reserve funds and bond issuances.However,the current and future use of reserve funds may be a worthwhile topic of conversation so that the Council has a full 2 understanding of the Administration's methodology for use of reserve funds versus bonding for capital projects. Additional information: - The Administration's 2011-12 proposal will reduce the combined cash reserves amount from$64 million to$22.5 million, leaving a reserve fund that is 36% of the Department's total operating expenses. - The Department has a goal of not allowing fund balances to drop below 10% of operating expenses. - Bond issuances are planned for 2013 ($14.5 million) and in 2015 (for$15 million). - In 2012-13, even considering planned rate increases, reserve funds would decrease to 17% overall (and below 10% in the water fund). - The Department of Public Utilities maintains an independent AAA bond rating, a distinction among municipal utility providers. - Debt service payments for 2011-12 total$7.1 million across the three funds. IV. Staffing Changes for Sewer Line inspections - the Administration proposes to make some staffing changes across the Department. Each fund is affected, and the details are explained in the Fund write-ups. The Administration has reported that the goal of the staffing changes is to increase the number of staff people assigned for inspection and cleaning of sewer collection lines. This will increase customer service to residents by identifying problems and reducing the number of overflow incidents. This will be the first increase in the staffing document requested by the Department since 1999- 00. V. Personal Services Adjustments a) Salary Adjustments: each year the Department of Public Utilities prepares its budget in advance of any recommendation by the Mayor for salary adjustments. To plan for the option, the Administration includes a placeholder for possible salary adjustments. In the proposed 2011-12 budget, the placeholder is a 2% cost of living adjustment. As a reminder,nearly 72% of the Department's employees are 100 and 200 series employees with merit and cost of living pay increases negotiated between the City and the American Federation of State County&Municipal Employees Local 1004 (AFSCME). b) Health Benefits: the Administration is anticipating a 10% increase to the City's cost of health care benefits for the employees. The portion to be covered by the employees has not yet been finalized by the Administration. c) Note: since the Public Utilities Department budget is forwarded before the salary adjustments and health benefit amounts are finalized by the Administration,this is an area of the budget that may fluctuate between the Council's briefing and final adoption. VI. Other Projects of Note: a) Reducing Vehicle Idling - in an effort to reduce fuel consumption, monitoring software was installed in 139 vehicles of the Department's fleet to track average run time and average idle time. (Please refer to pages 37 and 38 of the Department's Budget book.) b) Since December 2008, the number of cumulative number of gallons used each month has steadily declined. 3 In addition, the Department reports that the average amount of idling time spent per month is decreasing. In September 2010, average monthly idle time was just over 2 hours. By January 2011,it was a bit above one half-hour. The Council may wish to discuss what the Department's next steps are for reducing fuel consumption, including tracking vehicle idling in larger vehicles. The Department has explored the possible use of alternative fuel vehicles. c) Riparian Corridor projects - As the Council is aware, the Riparian Corridor studies resulted in a lengthy list of projects. The study provided a prioritized list of the projects within each of the four canyons. The Administration proposes spending $959,000 toward riparian corridor projects. The projects include culvert repair and restoration projects along Red Butte and Emigration Creeks.This fee will not fund all projects identified in the riparian corridor study. The Council may wish to ask about funding a follow-up of the Riparian Corridor study in order to prioritize projects. The completed study of City Creek, Red Butte Creek, Emigration Creek, and Parley's Creek resulted in a list of projects that were prioritized by canyon, but not across all of the study areas. In addition, other riparian corridor projects in other areas around the City could be included to result in a broader prioritization of all projects. The Administration has also mentioned in the past that a study of the Jordan River be considered. The Council may also wish to ask how projects and funding decisions will be handled in future years, and whether the same level of funding will continue. For a more detailed view of each fund's budget,please see the following pages. The total Capital&Operating budget for the Water Enterprise Fund for fiscal year 2011-12 is proposed to be$69,080,633.The operating costs are$46,228,558,which is an increase of$1,259,982,or 2.8%. WATER FUND PROPOSED BUDGET Percent 11.31:• • Difference Chan•e -- $ 52,559,850 500,000 1.0% - - 300,000 50,000 -16.7f 500,000 0.0% 2,591,000 In� -0.2% MIRMSEIMME 50,000 0.0% Grants and Other related 905,000 300,000 33.1% revenues 9,419,976 2,010,405 Immo Total revenue 8 other $ 66,325,826 .i 2,754,807 4.2% sources ".1 ®'• .r 161,190 MEM 11 25,850,844 ;) 684,545 2.6% Total operating $ 44,968,576 •. 1,259,982 2.8% 11 ex•enses -h 16,462,250 '' 2,145,000 .. 65,000 3.0% e - 2,750,000 �'`.1111111111.11111111 0 0% Total Operating Expenses $ 66,326,826 2,754,807 4.2% 8 Capital Outlay In addition to the department highlights listed above,following are some key issues specific to Water Fund. Revenue Items: a. Water Rates & Fees - There is no proposed service rate increase for 2011-12, however the Administration is proposing to increase the fee to fund watershed and water rights purchases. The fee increase would be from$1.00 to$1.50 per account,and would generate an additional $500,000(a total of$1.5 million). In future years,the Administration anticipates needing additional water rate increases in the amount of 6%per year. b. Use of Reserve Funds-the Administration proposes the use of reserve funds toward capital projects this year.At the beginning of fiscal year 2009-10,the cash reserves totaled$37,877,759. Since that time,reserve funds have been used each year as shown in the chart below: 5 Water Cash Reserves Cash Reserve Planned Use of Reserve Year End Balance Ratio to Rate Fiscal Year Funds Remaining Operating Costs increase 2009-10 ($6,116,229) $ 31,761,530 78% (estimated actual)2010-11 ($10,300,001) $ 21,461,529 48% (proposed)2011-12 ($11,430,381) $ 10,031,148 22% 0 (projected)2012-13 ($6,806,106) $ 3,225,042 7% 6% (projected)2013-14 +$289,574 $ 3,514,616 7% 6% The healthy reserve balance has been critical to the Department's ability to sustain the capital improvement program during these tough economic times.As listed on page 2, the Council may wish to discuss the future plans for funding capital projects. a. Personal Services:Overall increase of$414,247-largely due to the cost of living adjustment and health benefit increases,as described on page 3.The staffing changes that will affect the Water F include: -1.0 FTE Warehouse Supervisor(eliminating a vacant position) -1.0 FTE Engineer IV&V(transferred to Stormwater and Sewer Funds) -1.0 FTE Payroll Position(transferred to General Fund HR position) -1.0 FTE Meter Reader(eliminating a vacant position) +1.0 FTE Customer Service Representative +0.5 FTE Seasonal Watershed enforcement +0.5 FTE Seasonal Canal enforcement -2.0 FTE Total Reduction to Water Fund staffing levels The Council may wish to ask about the shift from meter reading staff to customer service staff. b. Materials and Supplies(increase of$161,190 or 5.84%)-The increase is largely due to the cost for asphalt and repair materials,among other smaller increases. c. Charges for Services(increase of$684,5451-the largest piece of this increase is$380,000 for the increasing cost to purchase water from the Metropolitan Water District. The other increases are related to utility and fuel costs,payments for computer services,and other professional services. o Metropolitan Water District-Between the budget to purchase water from Metro and the annual assessment for the Metro capital projects,the City pays$18,570,892 to Metro each year. This is roughly 40% of the Water Fund's operating budget (and 13% of the Department's total budget). o Purchase of Water from Metropolitan Water District ("Metro): The largest increase to Water operating expenses is$380,000 due to the purchase of treated water from Metro.Of the City's water sources,nearly 50% is treated and supplied by Metro. For the proposed fiscal year,the average rate per acre foot will increase to$226,which is a$7 increase per acre foot over last year. Metro implemented a seasonal rate last year,and the$226 per acre foot averages the amount of water purchased at the winter rate,$124,and the summer rate,$342. 6 The Department is planning to purchase 51,000 acre feet of water this year. (Please note: the Department's budget book reflected purchasing 52,000 of of water, but this has been updated to 51,000. The expenses numbers in the book are correct.) Metro has raised the rates for the past several years and anticipates rate increases in the coming years as well. Historical Avg Future Avg Summer/ Summer/ Winter Rate Winter Rate Year (per acre foot) (per acre foot) 2007-08 $188 2008-09 $200 2009-10 $213 2010-11 $219 2012-13 $233 (3%) 2013-14 $240 (3%) 2014-15 $247 (3%) 2015-16 $254 (3%) o Annual assessments for the Metropolitan Water District Capital Improvements: In addition to the purchase of water, the department pays a $7 million assessment for Metropolitan Water District capital improvements.These payments continue in 2011-12,and will continue for the next 22 years. Sandy City is also making assessment payments to the Metropolitan Water District for their share of project costs. The Metropolitan Water District budget is set by the Metropolitan Water District Board. The Council has the opportunity to review the budget and give feedback, but does not approve the budget(this is currently scheduled for May 3rd). The following is included in the budget for capital improvements and purchases for fiscal year 2011-12. a. Capital Outlay - Vehicles & Equipment (increase of $65,000 or 14%) - The $2,210,000 budgeted for capital purchases allows the department to replace the necessary vehicles and make treatment plant purchases as needed. For vehicles, some necessary heavy equipment replacements will be made, and other vehicles will be replaced with an emphasis on fuel efficiency. The Council may wish to request information regarding the replacement of fleet and heavy vehicles. b. Continuation of the existing capital improvement program - This budget of $17.9 million is in addition to the assessments for the Metropolitan Water District capital improvements. 7 Proposed Water Capital Improvement Program 2011-12 Replacement of water lines and hydrants $ 8,929,075 Service Line Replacement&new $ 2,200,000 connection Land Purchases(watershed purchases) $ 1,500,000 Culverts, flumes&bridges $ 880,000 Treatment Plants $ 823,000 Pumping Plant Upgrades $ 807,000 Wells $ 535,000 Meter change out program $ 500,000 Maintenance Buildings $ 469,000 Reservoirs $ 445,000 Water meter replacement $ 400,000 Landscaping &Conservation Projects $ 374,000 Water stock purchases $ 30,000 Total Capital Improvement Program $ 17,892,075 -jI The Department has increased the budget for Capital Improvement projects by$1.5 million. - Waterline replacement program - The Department plans to replace 37,740 feet of pipe. The majority of the projects planned for water main replacements are located in the County. The department evaluates their pipes system-wide, and identifies repairs based on age,number of breaks, and type of pipe. This year, the majority of the work happens to occur in the County. - Water valve replacement - the Administration proposes continuing the $1 million funding for replacements and increasing the number of valves. This will reduce the time households go without water during shut downs and main breaks, because the area affected by water shut- offs will be more limited. - Water meter replacement program - the Department has determined that it is cost effective to replace meters that are 15 years old in order to ensure accurate reading. - Demolition of Department-owned Buildings - the budget includes the cost to demolish the Wasatch Electric Building, which was purchased two years ago, and the Guard House at the gate of City Creek Canyon. The Department has conducted a public process to notify users of the Canyon and neighboring community councils about the decision to demolish the Guard House. 8 • • The Capital & Operating budget for the Sewer Fund for fiscal year 2011-12 is prop. $50,067,200. The capital budget,including debt service,is proposed to be$37,528,600,which r; 75%of the total Sewer Budget. SEWER FUND PROPOSED BUDGET Percent =MU= Difference Chan.e !- rr rr111362111 250,000 r r'• 350,000 i111111111E1 0.0% 70,000 -.'jam 0 0% Contributions b Develo.ers 500,000 $3000, ,000 600.0% Sale of Pro.ert 20,000 .� 6 0.0% • 135 000 M11.11.33 0 0% Bond Proceeds 13,000,000 $13,000,000 -100.0% Marna 16,265,689 :1 Total revenue 8.other $ 47,833,189 ..:;9 $2,234,011 4.7% sources 56,981,632 $418,961 6.0% IMMMI:IMICENI IEEEMEGIMEMINIMIIIIINIMDEBf®r IHMEMEI 30,790,500 .1 1,490,000 MIME r r :1 43,600 MEM 1=131Z1112,935,000 25,000 0.9% Total Operating Expenses $ 47,833,189 •;•1, $2,234,011 4.7% &Capital Outla In addition to the department highlights listed above,following are some key issues specific to the Sewer Fund. Revenue Items: a. No Rate Increase-There is no proposed rate or fee increases for 2011-12 in the Sewer Fund, however there are 4%rate increases are planned for each of the next four years.Although there are no rate increases, the service rate revenue is anticipated to increase as the economy improves and more wastewater is processed through the City's system. b. Use of Reserve Funds-$28,242,200 in reserve funds will be used toward capital projects. Note: Several projects that were budgeted for the 2010-11 fiscal year will be carried over to 2011-12. Sewer Cash Reserves Cash Reserve Planned Use of Reserve Year End Balance Ratio to Rate Fiscal Year Funds Remaining Operating Costs increase 2009-10 ($758,920) $ 38,721,430 379% (estimated actual)2010-11 ($382,644)' $ 38,338,786 323% (proposed)2011-12 ($28,242,200) $ 10,096,586 81% 0% (projected)2012-13 ($5,183,096) $ 4,913,490 39% 4 e% (projected)2013-14 ($1,236,927) $ 3,676,563 29% 4% *Please Note: 2010-11 use of funds was budgeted much higher, but funds will be encumbered to next year as projects are carried over. 9 c. _i[�. 4..[S} e[�..x`.M1 a' � [ � a. Personal Services - Overall increase of$418,961 due to staffing changes, cost of living adjustments, and increased benefits costs.The staffing changes include: +4.0 FTEs Sewer Collection Crew +1.0 FTE Engineer position at the Treatment Plan to work on the pre-treatment program -0.5 FTE Engineer (transferred to Stormwater) The sewer collection staff would be used directly for the inspection of collection lines to reduce the potential for overflows and backups of the system. The additional staff will enable the department to significantly increase the number of inspections and cleanings. (This request is accompanied by a proposed equipment purchase,which is included in the Capital budget section.) b. Charges for Services - overall increase of $243,950 due to consulting fees and instrumentation charges related to the pre-treatment process. The Administration has also proposed an increase to the fleet fuel budget in anticipation of rising gas prices. The proposed budget reflects a total capital budget of $37,528,600 for capital improvement projects, vehicle&equipment purchases, and debt service. a. Capital Improvement Projects(increase of$7.8 million) Proposed Capital Improvement Program Sewer Fund 2011-12 Collection Lines $ 19,640,500 Treatment Plant $ 10,760,000 Maintenance &repair shops $ 200,000 Lift Stations $ 1,680,000 Total Capital Improvement Program $ 32,280,500 b. The major projects for the Sewer Fund: • Upgrade to the Orange Street Trunk Line, which is a collector line directly to the Treatment Plant. Based on the Sewer Master Plan and condition of the line, the Department is moving forward with this large project. Using a slip lining method for repair, disruption to customers and traffic should be significantly minimized during construction. Funding for this project was generated by issuing bonds in 2010. • Toward the end of 2009,the Council processed a bond issuance for a zero-interest bond with the State for a $6.3 million digester cover replacement project. The project was expanded to include the replacement of the digester walls, which has increased the total cost of the project to $9.4 million. • Oil Drain project: EPA mandated remediation of the Northwest Oil Drain Canal. The total project cost is estimated at $4.5 million, which will be offset by $3 million reimbursed by participating oil companies. The canal stretches from the Wastewater Reclamation Facility out to the Great Salt Lake. The canal has contamination and is required to be cleaned by the EPA and UDEQ. The remediation work will occur during the 2011 and 2012 construction seasons. 10 • In addition to these major projects,the Fund will replace 65,550 linear feet of pipe. c. Vehicle & Equipment Purchases ($43,600 increase) - The budget is $2,288,100 for vehicles and equipment, including trucks, dump trucks, and other maintenance & plant equipment. This includes a vehicle for use by the sewer line cleaning crew. n";re ..;yia �q' t �g g =v ¢,re " a t r 4g-2�. g �C-' I?x, F' 0Ae I"j/� P �Ci F% arc`P r�i s'4 7 ;. X k „y,,£:u:fie ,u T "„Lawb"jrx"�s�"-.X* �z.7sa s;: �� .r„ k! -T.. �- rti „ , x° (3,,.c�� s � ,.. 'u7r ;b.,f-F The Capital & Operating budget for the Stormwater Fund for fiscal year 2011-12 is proposed to be $18,714,284, which is an increase of $4,248,167 primarily due to the capital budget. The operating expenses are$4,032,284. STORMWATER FUND PROPOSED BUDGET Amended ka'r• ". Difference Percent 2010-11 - `T Qua'' Chan•e Revenue & other sources __- Stormwater service fee $7,600,000 r. e_ $450,000 5.92% Count Flood Control -� _ . $0 #DIV/0! Interest 100,000 a e $0 0.00% Im•act fees 200,000 ;F o e 2 e j $0 0.00% Systems constructed by 516,000 ' - s i o $0 0 00% develo•ers . . +... Other revenue 1,000 , ;, - ➢'1;��:®_® $0 0.00% Bond Proceeds 0. „'r ym .@ o $8,000,000 Use of reserves 6,049,117 nZ71:1 $4,201,833 -69.46% Total revenue & other sources $14,466,117 !,',..;„1,,,Kifing $4,248,167 29.37% Ex.enses F $0 #DIV/0! Salaries, wa.es & benefits $1,851,044 $105,567 5.70% Materials & su••lies 112,700 $2,450 2.17% Charses for services 2,141,373 $180,850 -8.45% Total o.eratin. ex.enses $ 4,105,117 $72,833 -1.77% Ca•ital im•rovement 9,175,500 $3,517,500 38.34% Vehicles & e.ui•ment 585,500 $3,500 0.60% Debt Service 600,000 $800,000 133.33% Total Expenses& Capital $14,466,117 $4,248,167 29.37% Outlay In addition to the department highlights listed above, following are some key issues specific to the Stormwater Fund. Revenue Items: a. Rates &Fees o There is no proposed service rate increases for 2011-12, however the Administration is proposing a new fee to customers of$0.25 per unit per month to generate funds dedicated to Riparian Corridor projects. o It is anticipated that this new fee will generate$450,000 in revenues. o The $0.25 fee per billing unit is a 5.9% increase. o The billing unit is based on the amount of impervious area on the property. ■ Most residential properties equal one billing unit,and would pay an additional$3.00 per year. 11 • Commercial properties may have more impervious area and multiple billing units. The Administration has provided a chart on page 35 that shows the sample increase to various commercial accounts. o No rate increases are anticipated in FY2013 or FY2014. b. Use of reserves-Using the$1,847,284 from reserves would leave the balance at$2,443,339. Current forecasts anticipate adding cash to reserves during 2012-13 and 2013-14. a. Personal Services-Overall increase of$105,567 due to the cost of living adjustment and health benefit increases,as described on page 3. The staffing changes in the Stormwater fund include shifting 0.5 FTE of an Engineer position and creating a Stormwater manager position. b. Charges for Services(decrease of$180,850)-This reduction is due to removing the budget for the Riparian Corridor study,which is complete.That reduction is offset by increases in fleet fuel costs and maintenance,and an increase to the transfer to the General Fund for street sweeping costs. The proposed budget reflects a total capital budget of$14,682,000 for capital improvement projects, vehicle&equipment purchases,and debt service. a. Capital Improvement Projects(increase of$3,517,500) The proposed budget reflects a capital improvement budget of$12,693,000 for fiscal year 2011-12 which is a 38%increase from last year. Proposed Capital Improvement Program Storm Water Fund 2011-12 Collection Lines $ 11,324,000 Riparian Corridor Improvements $ 959,000 Lift Stations $ 410,000 Land - Total Capital Improvement Program $ 12,693,000 b. Major Projects: • $7.5 million: Folsom Avenue storm drain alignment and construction. This project is still in design,and will likely include at least 2 construction phases.Phase 1 will be the underground Stormwater infrastructure component of conduit alignment.Phase 2 will include above ground design elements following the conduits path.Funding responsibility and sources are still to be determined for Phase 2. • $580,000:Yalecrest Avenue(1080 South)storm line:-runs from 1500 East to 1700 East • $959,000:Riparian Corridor Improvements • In addition to these major projects,the Fund will replace 14,000 linear feet of pipe. 12 • Additional Information WATER BACKGROUND Salt Lake City's water delivery system to City and County residents depends on a complex network of dams, aqueducts, water treatment plants, distribution reservoirs, and water mains. Upkeep and maintenance of older systems and construction of new systems is very costly. The Department of Public Utilities has over 91,000 water service connections. The Department maintains treatment plants, wells,reservoirs,1,222 miles of water mains,and 178 miles of conduit and supply lines. SEWER FUND BACKGROUND The Department of Public Utilities has over 49,340 sewer connections. The Sewer Fund maintains 641 miles of sanitary sewer pipe and connection lines. The reclamation plant treats an average of li35,000,000 gallons of sanitary sewer per day. Maintaining the sewer lines and operating the lift stations and reclamation plant is accomplished with 104.6 employees. Effective January 1,2001,sewer fees were based on discharge strength as well as volume. Approximately 2,500 of the 49,340 accounts are charged an additional fee because they discharge sewage with strengths greater than domestic or residential sewer flows. This change sets rates so that residential customers or commercial customers with domestic discharges do not subsidize customers with greater than domestic strength discharges. This rate structure encourages businesses to reduce discharge strengths. STORM WATER BACKGROUND The Department of Public Utilities maintains over 470 miles of stormwater pipe and collection lines using 28.2 employees. It was 1991 when the General Fund transferred the entire storm drain system under Public Utilities management. July 1991 began the implementation of a new stormwater fee based on surface area. This last January was the first time rates have increased since 1991.No public tax dollars have been used to help the system. Stormwater employees also monitor the snow pack water content and manage the stormwater permit process. ill 13 DEBRA ALEXANDER S....A1/ '1 at1 CN I RALPH BECKER DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCE MAYOR SCANNED TO: kita CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL SCANNED BY: I i• DATE: ul -6. boo Date Received: V{ j O(P f Zt I Dav' veritt, I ief of Staff Date sent to Council: 01 CP p i)(l TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 6, 2011 Jill Remington Love, Chair V3)„,-1L, (n^— FROM: Debra Alexander, Director Human Resource Department ';PR - 6 2011 pi SUBJECT: Health Plan Update By ?aCA/LekC . STAFF CONTACT: Debra Alexander, HR Director (801) 535-6604 Jodi Langford, Human Resource Program Manager (801) 535-6610 DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing RECOMMENDATION: This presentation is for informational purposes BUDGET IMPACT: To be determined BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This briefing is intended to provide City Council members information and an update of the status of the City's medical plan. This will include medical plan history (including premiums versus claims). Historical reserve balance, premium increases, and benefit changes. We will also discuss the medical plan reserve status as of 12/31/2010. Included is a comparison of Salt Lake City's employee premiums to the average annual premium for workers of State/Local Government. PUBLIC PROCESS: Not applicable. 0 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 1 1 5, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5464 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 145464, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114.5464 TELEPHONE: 801-535-7900 FAX: 801-535-661 4 Gs Medical Plan History Salt Lake City 12 Month Rolling Experience and Revenue PMPM Based on PEHP Actuarial Data s300 Large Claims =Claims (Excluding Large Claims) $zso III1Admin & Access Fees —Premium szoo — — — slso sioo $0 Jul-01 Jul-02 Jul-03 Jul-04 Jul-05 Jul-06 Jul-07 Jul-08 Jul-09 Jul-10 • Beginning in FY 2001, PEHP and the City adjusted benefits and increased premiums in an effort to insure premiums exceed claims and that the deficit is resolved. • Until the middle of FY 2010 a continuing dramatic increase in the number of large and catastrophic claims, have outpaced monies paid in premiums by the City. • Rising health care costs,as well as increased utilization, contributed to this trend. 0 n 0 Medical Plan Reserve History and Plan Changes Contingency Financial Premium Reserve Benefit Plan Changes Statement Increases (millions) 6/30/2001 -$0.54 32% Changed pharmacy and office visit 6/30/2002 $1.95 11% No plan changes 6/30/2003 $3.12 2% Introduced new medical plan(INC Advantage Care)&Healthy Utah(wellness) 6/30/2004 $1.79 9.3% Increased ER co-pay,new$150 inpatient Hosp. increased inpatient co-insurance Increased office visit co-pay,ER co-pay,inpatient co-insurance, 6/30/2005 $1.41 7.4% changed pharmacy co-pay from flat dollar to percentage(Pref&Adv), City paid 100%premium for employees with single coverage 6/30/2006 $1.16 3.75% Implemented deductible,increased max out of pocket City paid 100%premium for employees covered under Summit Care Increased max out of pocket,increased co-insurance anesthesia and surgeon, 6/30/2007 $1.34 10% changed pharmacy co-pay from flat dollar to percentage(Summit)City paid 100%premium for employees covered under Summit Care Increased max out of pocket,changed out of network office visit,increase max 6/30/2008 $2.62 14% out of pocket,increased co-insurance on Pref only,changed the pharmacy minimum&maximum,City stopped mandatory medical plan enrollment with a premium split of 95/5 Increased deductible,max out of pocket and office visit co-pay,covered 6/30/2009 -$4.95 4.6% prevention benefits at 100%before deductible,changed to 3 tier office visit co-pay,City shifted premium split to 90/10 6/30/2010 $4.07 ggo Increased max out of pocket,increased ER City shifted premium split to 85/15 • • Medical Plan Contingency Reserve Status The City's medical plan deficit is not a cash deficit,it is a contingency reserve deficit that includes 1. Cash in the City's account held by PEHP to pay claims 2. Administrative costs 3. An actuarial assumption based on claims history to account for claims that have been incurred but not submitted and paid As of 6/30/10 our contingency reserve deficit balance was negative$4,074,077,this included a cash balance of$104,040 and an estimated$4,178,117 for incurred but not reported claims and administrative expenses. As of 12/31/10 our contingency reserve deficit balance was negative$2,139,199,this included a cash balance of $630,300 and an estimated$2,769,499for incurred but not reported claims and administrative expenses. There will be a three year deficit reduction plan where the City and employees will contribute additional premiums over the next three years or until the deficit reserve is in a healthy position. O 0 Kaiser Family Foundation Employer Health Benefits 2010 Below,the Kaiser Family Foundation 2010 Health Benefits Report(Exhibit 1.4)shows the average annual premium for workers of State/Local Government with single coverage is$5,852 and$14,684;the annual premium for workers of Salt Lake City with single coverage is$4,366 and$13,097 $16,000 $14,000 - $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 —*—Kaiser Report tSalt Lake City $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 �1Y1 EJEFFRY T. NIERMEVER M 1 \�CRYIC� RAIS RECE D DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES � R MAYOR1 �D 1 WATER SUPPLY AND WATERWORKS Y 2011 1 WATER RECLAMATION AND STORMWATER COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Salt Lake City Maycr Date received: 03 ( 7-c)1 David veritt, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: TO: Jill Remington Love DATE: March 18, 2011 City Council Chair FROM: Jeffry T. Niermeyer, Director of Public Utilities / SUBJECT: Request for a briefing on proposed Public Utilities budget for 2011-2012 STAFF CONTACT: Jim Lewis, Finance Administrator(483-6773) DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Request RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Public Utilities 2011-2012 budget 1 C BUDGET IMPACT: Proposed Budget for 2011-2012 Operating Cost Debt Service Capital Total Water Utility $46,228,558 $2,750,000 $20,102,075 $69,080,633 Sewer Utility 12,538,600 2,960,000 34,568,600 50,067,200 Stormwater Utility 4,032,284 1,400,000 13,282,000 18,714,284 Total $62,799,442 $7,110,000 $67,952,675 $137,862,117 Major Budgetary Topics • Department O&M Budget is $62,799,442. Capital budget $67,952,675. The budgeted Debt servicing is $7,110,000—grand total of$137,862,117 • Water rate increase of $0.50 per account on the service fee for the purchase of watershed and water rights. This will increase the water land purchase fee by $.0.50 to $1.50 per account increasing the water shed purchase account from $1 million to $1.5 million annually. • Stormwater rate increase of $0.25 per month per ERU (equivalent residential unit) to • pay for needed Riparian Corridor Projects. Sewer rates are unchanged. SCANNED TO: v1\1 1 530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 SCANNED BY. -i t i TELEPHONE: 801-483-6900 FAX: 801-483-6B1 B WWW.SLCOOV.COM DATE: )�/ Revom PAPER • Operating budgets for all three funds increase for personnel,benefits and materials as • costs of doing business increase. Watershed and other environmental protection programs continue. The Department is proposing to increase personnel by 3 FTEs (Full-time Equivalent Employees). a. Sewer Collection Crew +4 e. Water warehouse supervisor -1 b. Customer Service Rep +1 f. Water Payroll Position -1 c. Watershed seasonal +.5 g. Meter reader =1 d. Canal seasonal +.5 Total Change +3 • Overall budgeted construction is aggressive with$22 million applied to four projects: the Orange Street sewer trunk line, Folsom Avenue storm drain, wastewater digester plant covers and water valve replacement program.Other capital projects include EPA required property remediation of the Northwest Oil Drain of$4.5 million with $3 million reimbursed by participating oil companies. • Stormwater budget proposes the issuance of$8 million in revenue bonds for the Folsom stormwater line construction. O 0 >-, v) r Ai / Nu ikt i- w i / / A . NI ININNI immn i ip 1..... k / ...t. 4i, i . ...z , Q ,.., 4. III Ilm" le usi i , Z _J * 4.- < M •; =..) Nomil . . U // r it ime 1 I mml i 11 4, litiki . < CO I " — S* \ i (in m i ' 1 I k ' likk '1 Ark\1 • • 1 n t 'k %4 II, a I I 1 •I 4 •:' alia.II . Iva 4., 1/44. ' I # If ''' ii ' , % 1 1 la i // 4 . , „ r 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET ' SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR 2011- 2012 1 \tic.E.Cify y; 5o Public Utilities � / Mayor&Department Recommended l`�e y T.Niermeyeirector Executive Summary 2011-2012 +�Recommended Budget,Goals and Objectives Summarization of the current budget proposal: • Department O&M Budget is $62.799.442. Capital budget $67.9c2.675. The budgeted Debt servicing is$7.110.000—grand total of$137.862.117 • Water rate increase of $0.5o per account on the service fee for the purchase of watershed and water rights. This will increase the water ' land purchase fee by $.0.5o to $1.50 per account increasing the water shed purchase account from$i million to$1.5 million annually. • Stormwater rate increase of$0.25 per month per ERU(Equivalent Residential ' Unit) to pay for needed Riparian Corridor Projects. Sewer rates are unchanged. • Operating budgets for all three funds increase for personnel, benefits 1 and materials as costs of doing business increase. Watershed and other environmental protection programs continue. The Department is proposing to increase personnel by 3 FTEs(Full-time Equivalent Employees). a. Sewer Collection Crew+4 e. Water warehouse supervisor -1 b. Customer Service Rep +1 f. Water Payroll Position -1 c. Watershed seasonal +.5 g. Meter reader -1 d. Canal seasonal +.5 Total Change • Overall budgeted construction is aggressive with$22 million applied to ' four projects:the Orange Street sewer trunk line,Folsom Avenue storm drain, wastewater digester plant covers and water valve replacement program. Other capital projects include EPA required property remediation of the Northwest Oil Drain of$4.5 million with$3 million reimbursed by participating oil companies. • Stormwater budget proposes the issuance of$8 million in revenue bonds for the Folsom stormwater line construction. 1 1 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET Department Budget Detail Information for the three funds Background: The Salt Lake City water distribution system (WDS) is very large containing a total of 1,403 miles of pipe in 2010 and over fifty pressure zones. 1111 Sewer sanitation pipes stretch 654 miles with Stormwater lines covering 474 miles. Maintaining this vast underground system is difficult even during the best of times. Knowing the condition of our entire buried pipe system and maintaining these systems requires the latest high tech GIS and pipe replacement or maintenance techniques. The service area covers the Salt Lake City corporate boundaries as well as the east side of the Salt Lake valley all the way to the mouth p of Little Cottonwood Canyon plus some vast areas of watershed in our local canyons. Public Utilities tracks funding and expenses separately for all three utilities to ensure that each fund works as a self-supporting business unit under only one guiding administrative team. Expansion of Sewer Cleaning Team For the first time since 1998, the Department is asking to increase Sewer personnel by 4 full-time employees along with a new Jet truck. The Department's line cleaning goals are far above the current crew's ability to reach minimum �!!� standards and ensure that homes or businesses are not flooded with raw sewage. I The Department expects that the savings in damage claims and other cleanup will exceed the expected additional costs. Greater detail is included in the Sewer Aim Section write-up. Metropolitan Water District costs are 13.7% of the Department's entire budget. The Department purchases water from Metropolitan (Metro) each year along with paying for additional capital constructed by Metro that has added to the Departments water resources in the valley. The Department pays over $7 million annually for a capital assessment and is proposing to purchase 52,000 acre-feet (AF)of water at a cost of $11.54 million. Metro's water rates are increasing each year by 3% on a preapproved plan and will be $332 per AF during summer and $216 in the winter. Large Scale Projects are planned on Orange Street, Folsom and at the Waste Treatment Plant. The Sewer Fund CIP program leads with a $io million trunk line rehabilitation (Orange St.) and $10 million for various and ongoing projects at the treatment plant. The Folsom Project in Stormwater will require an $8 million bond issue to assist in the drainage of City Creek watershed. Another $6 million is also budgeted for various repairs to the existing sewer collection line system. Personnel Cost Increases The Department anticipates increases of about 10% for health care benefits. Cost of living (COLA) and merits will raise expense another couple of percent. Total 2 I 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET 116 costs of all modifications anticipated in personnel will be 3.7% including the increases in 11'rs for the Sewer Fund. IStormwater Riparian Corridor Projects The Riparian Corridor Study is being used to begin funding of both Red Butte I and Emigration Creek's rehabilitation of the stream,its banks,natural vegetation and animal life. The various projects total$960,00o for the new budget year. I Remediation of Northwest Oil Drain Canal Since 2003 the canal by the Sewer Treatment Plant was discovered to be contaminated through years of association and use from the railroad and local oil I companies. Hoping to mitigate the problem with a mutual cleanup agreement between the railroads and oil companies the department began the process of cleanup back in 2003. Recent EPA review still shows contaimination and based I on estimated costs,the Sewer Fund is budgeting$4.5 million this year to finish the clean up project. Cost reimbursement from the oil companies will be $3 million with$1.5 million the department's cost. ' Water Capital Improvements Water CIP totals$18.8 million and includes a wide range of projects from pipe I replacement,demolition of old buildings to treatment plant upgrades,new pump stations, upkeep on reservoirs and valve replacement. Highlights include $1 million for the 3rd East 33rd South to 39th South main line,Olympus Cove pump Station and valve replacement program. The Water Fund is also budgeting$1.2 million for motive equipment. I Historical&Current Capital System Information The Salt Lake City water distribution system(WDS)is very large(1,226 miles of 12"or smaller distribution lines plus 178 miles of large transmission mains for a I total footage of 1,404 miles of pipe in 2010)and complicated(over fifty pressure zones). The service area covers the Salt Lake City corporate boundaries as well as the east side of the Salt Lake valley all the way to the mouth of Little Cottonwood �!! Canyon. Figure 1 shows the age history of the water pipes. This is an aging L system with corrosion and other factors that affect the competency of the pipes. There is a continual need to repair and replace bad pipe segments to maintain I service and reduce emergency break repair costs and impacts to the public. Figure 2 shows 93 miles of water main were replaced in the last ten years. I GINM Footage Weteri•sFootage166• WATER REPLACEMENT FOOTAGE t 460 100.000 1 260 11.91� I 1 ow i 90000 ,1,i S3.37 ,,)6 v12E t60 0 000 1/ ISNo a ]1874J2h1 [1b08b06R1 000 ,, .w 260 S 0 • • •• • •• •••• ♦•. •20000 i e e e e • e e .. e • e an Y e FISCAL YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 N s 3 1 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET 4 Figure 1. Pipeline Age for the Salt Lake City Figure 2. Water System Repair and Replacement Water Distribution System Program The sewer collection system (655 miles in 2010) is a very corrosive environment I with hydrogen sulfide gases, sediment, roots and other factors that affect the competency of the pipes. With this environment there is a continual need to I repair and replace bad pipe segments. More than 50% of the sewer collection system is more than 85 years old (Figure 3). The goal for Sewer program is to rehabilitate at least 1% of our old pipe system every year (Figure 4). 1 mios Age of Sewer lines de Total Miles SEWER LINE REPLACEMENT 700 1111111111..uiini11MMI" i r S00 sUuun■nr■__..■■I• 70 004 6�,66456717 400 i iiiiillu MOMMIIMIEll ! e0 000 ' t,=yi o1,954 300 UIEMPAiII•II111.111111111111 i 50 000 200 p®�I'A IIIIII�IIUUU I l5 40 000 r----- -- s,.:.134,1'6;6Y0 100 0 :•,.q■u■■■�■■■Mu■.. 30 909 �9p33 1E.830 O ti O O O O 15. O O O O ti 20 00 - 11,748 O P N M P IP P0 10.+ P P O O0♦ ■ . . . . . • • ■N N 0 Y 1 p YO E. MN P hPt VS VP N a M O N N 1.i N N N to N N N Time Period(5-year increments) foci Sear Figure 3. Pipeline Age&miles for the Salt Lake Figure 4. Sewer System Restoration Program in linear City Sewer Collection System feet The last Drainage Master Plan was completed in 1993. The projects identified in the Master Plan will take at least another 15 years to complete. In the last ten years almost 40 miles of storm drain pipe has been installed (Figure 5). Some of the major projects are listed in Figure 6. STORMWATEP PIPE INSTALLATION 50- 490.0 15.000 — - tz'zB0 1997 Imperial&2700 So Storm Drain $1 m ti!• 29.053 2000 200 So Pump Station Jordan River $850k so.o.o 2001 Goggin Drain Improvements $200k22.224 ns a ow g,y5 22A6 I2xE u... 10 21.81E 2002 Wilmington Storm Drain $500k I n o.0 2006 900 South Storm Drain $16m n.�er 2007 CWA#2 Pump Station $1.2m no*. ■ . . . u roe ■ . . 2008 City Creek Diversion $1.3m to 000 2009 Upgrade Oil Drain Station $700k IRL, s ow • • • • • • • • • Westside Drainage Channels (ongoing) ' o . . Replace Cross Drains in Av (ongoing) « e Future Folsom Stormdrain(2011) $8 m I Fiscal Vow Figure 5. Drainage Pipe Installation History Figure 6. Partial List of Master Plan Projects 1 4 I I 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET WATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND- SUMMARY OFMAJOR BUDGET ISSUES The recommended budget for the Water Fund for fiscal year 2011-2012 illustrates I an increase in all expenditures by $2.7 million or 4.1%. With a $17.9 million capital improvements budget the capital program exceeds last year's amount by 5.7%. Operating expenses increase a total of 2.8% in Water or $1.3 million. I Metro water purchases, utility increases, salary and benefit increases are the major factors for the bump in operations. • Water Rate Increase IWater service fee will increase $0.5o a month per connection, $6 per connection annually,for a total of$500,00o to increase the watershed and I water rights purchase fund. This will increase the annual amount for purchases from $1 million to $1.5 million. The current tier rates will remain unchanged and remain an effective tool for water conservation. II Capital improvements will remain solid this year without an additional rate increase. • Bonding and future rate increases I The Department anticipates water rate increases of 6%in each of the next two years to continue an aggressive capital program. Capital programs will require bonds of$5.5 million in 2013 and$15 million in 2015 over the 1111 next three years if the expected projections remain unchanged. • Continued increases for Metropolitan Water District water purchases This budget includes an anticipated increase in the average cost of treated Iwater from the Metropolitan Water District of $13 per acre foot or $380,000. IAnalysis of Estimated Revenue An analysis of the estimated revenue contained in the Department's Irecommended Budget for the Water Fund is as follows. Amended Proposed Budget Budget I Revenue 2009-2010 2010-2011 Difference Percent Charges for services $52,559,850 $53,059,850 $500,000 0.95% Interest 300,000 250,000 (50,000) -16.67%I Interfund charges 2,591,000 2,585,402 (5,598) -0.22% Sale of used equipment 50,000 50,000 0 0.00% Impact fees 500,000 500,000 0 0.00%I Contributions by Developers 905,000 1,205,000 300,000 33.15% Use of Reserve Funds 9,419,976 11,430,381 2,010,405 21.34% TOTAL $66,325,826 $69,080,633 $2,754,807 4.15% 1111 ' 5 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET Revenue from Charges for Services: The proposed budget increases $500,000 111 reflecting a 5o cent per account per month increase which is to be set aside for purchase of watershed and water rights. Water sales revenue is budgeted based on a potential wetter than normal year and we expect little or no change. Interest Income: Interest income continues to decrease as the pool of cash will decline with the continued strength of the capital program. Interest rates will simply not produce much revenue and the trend is expected to continue. Interfund Charges and Other Reimbursements: Slight decrease in billing charges otherwise remains the same as last year. Contributions by Developers: Accounting standards require contributions by developers to be classified as non-operating revenue. This area is expected to increase as the economy appears to be improving slightly. Impact Fees: Impact fees continue to be a conservative estimate and are fully dependent on new growth or expansion. Funds obtained are used for projects directly related to the fees paid on the new growth or expansion. No change estimated this year. Reserve Funds: The Department plans on about $11.4 million of its reserves to pay for continued capital improvement projects which will further dwindle cash reserves with no expected rate increase. Analysis of Proposed Expenditures The expenditure budget for the Department is proposed to increase by $2,754,807 or 4.15% over the 2010 - 2011 budget. The proposed budget for fiscal year 2011 - 2012 by major category is as follows: Amended Proposed Major Expenditure Budget Budget Category 2010-2011 2011-2012 Difference Percent Personal services $16,357,187 $16,771,434 $414,247 2.53% Materials and supplies 2,760,545 2,921,735 161,190 5.84% Charges for services 25,850,844 26,535,389 684,545 2.65% Debt service 2,750,000 2,750,000 0 0.00% Capital outlay 2,145,000 2,210,000 65,000 3.03% Capital improvement program 16,462,250 17,892,075 1,429,825 8.69% TOTAL $66,325,826 $69,080,633 $2,754,807 4.15% Personal Services: This area increases $414,000 as expected COLA and health benefit increases take a significant jump. The Water Fund personnel will decrease by 2 FTEs from last year. A total of 4 positions were eliminated with two new positions added. The Water Fund had an increase in a customer service rep. and a seasonal employee shared 5o/50 in watershed and canal maintenance. Materials & Supplies: The proposed budget for materials and supplies will 111 increase 5.8% in the amount of$161,190 for the following reasons: 6 1 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET • Increase in asphalt material of$ioo,000. • Increase in water repair materials of$80,000. • Increase in building repair materials of$44,000. ' • Increase in books and supplies of$3,000. • Increase in small tools of$1,150. • Decrease of<$63,050>for chemicals,postage and copy center charges. • Decrease in other supplies and services of<$3,910>. Charges for Services: The Department proposes the following budget changes to ' the charges for services as it increases$684,545. Professional services increases some for a to year safety inspection of the Department's water storage tanks and legal fees. • Increase of $380,00o for water purchases and treatment from the Metropolitan Water District • Increase in utility rate costs for power and natural gas of$98,700 • Increase in fleet fuel of$50,000 M • Increase in cost of computer maintenance charges of$41,700 • Increase in Administrative fees paid to the General Fund of$1o,000 ' • Increase in professional services(legal fees)of$82,899 • Increase in point-of-mountain pump costs of $35,000 ' • Other various decreases of<$3,754> Capital Outlay: The proposed Water budget for fiscal year 2011-2012 includes only a$65,00o increase from last year or a total of$2.21 million. This includes ' $1,045,00o replacement vehicles and $218,00o for field equipment. Pump, telemetry and treatment plant equipment total $476,000. Office equipment includes$too,000 for billing system upgrade of a total$190,00o budget. Other non-motive equipment of$276,00o includes $40,00o for GPS management of fuel usage and tracking for efficient use of city vehicles. Capital Improvement Program: The Department's proposed CIP budget for fiscal year 2011-2012 is$1.4 million more than the previous year as it remains a very aggressive proposal despite the slow rebound in the economy. Capital project 111 summary by facility types are listed on the following page. 7 1 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET Proposed Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Type of Project Budget Amount Replacement of water lines and hydrants $8,929,075 Reservoirs 445,000 Treatment plants 823,000 Wells 535,000 Maintenance buildings 469,000 Water meter replacement 400,000 Meter change out program 500,000 Culverts, flumes& bridges 880,000 Water stock purchases 30,000 Land purchases 1,500,000 Landscaping& Conservation Projects 374,000 Service Line Replacement& new connection 2,200,000 Pumping Plant Upgrades 807,000 Total 2011-2012 Capital Improvement Program $17,892,075 The proposed capital budget is an aggressive but balanced proposal in all areas of the water system. There are several large projects spread throughout the program including a valve replacement program of $i million and a new pump station at a total project cost of $2 million for Olympus Cove but only design of $130,000 is budgeted this year. Added improvements to the irrigation system are expected to run $800,000. Water main, hydrant and valve replacements will run about $9 million as shown above. Overall the CIP budget is a well balanced ,. scattering of needed projects for the water system. 8 1 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET 111/ SEWER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND SUMMARY OF MAJOR POLICY ISSUES ' The Department's recommended Sewer Utility budget for fiscal year 2011-2012 is $49,993,200 or an increase of 4.52%from last year. All of the increase is caused by the EPA remediation project,otherwise the budget would have decreased 1.7% However, the capital program will actually increase from last year or $32.3 million. Funding of only $21.8 million will require the Department to pull reserves of$28.2 million to cover the budgeted costs. Prior year revenue was supplemented by a$13 million bond issue. Those funds will be prominently used for this FY 2011/12 budget. • Expansion of Sewer Collection & Cleaning Program — The Sewer Fund is ' asking for an additional 4 employees and a new Jet Truck to keep pace with the pipe cleaning desired by the Department and televised inspection. This will assist in reducing costly damage claims and follow the recommendations of the consultants on the recent Sewer Master Plan Study. • Continue Orange Street Trunk Line Rehab to Treatment Plant—A multi-year ' project,the Department bonded last year for$10 million to reline and spot fix a major trunk line to the treatment plant that has serious corrosion problems. • Continue stimulus grant funds for anaerobic digester covers—Stimulus aid of $6.3 began in 2010 will continue for the replacement of three existing digester covers providing greater efficiency design for additional gas storage. This will ' increase both gas pressure and volume to the plant's co-generation facility providing potential for additional energy savings for plant costs and mitigating odor problems. ' • 200'1 Northwest Oil Drain Remediation Project—Once part of the canal from ' the Sewer Treatment Plant to the Great Salt Lake,the local oil companies used this canal as an oil waste runoff. As an EPA supervised cleanup,a budget increase of$4.5 million this year is expected to fully decontaminate the area. ' Part of the costs,$3 million,will be reimbursed from adjacent oil companies. • No rate increase — No change in rates is desired for 2011-12, but with a significant volume of capital projects this and next year,funds will be needed. Funding through rate increases for future capital projects are presented below. A 4%increase in the future will generate less than$1 million per year. Suggested Future Rate Increases ' 2011/12 0% current year 2012/13 4% 2013/14 4% 2014/15 4% 9 i I 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET Ciii Analysis of Revenue I The revenue budget is proposed to increase$2,160,011 or 4.52%to$49,993,200 for 2011-2012 from $47,833,189 for 2010-2011. An analysis of the estimated revenue contained in the Department's Recommended Budget is as follows: I Amended Proposed ' Budget Budget Revenue 2010-2011 2011-2012 Difference Percent Sewer Services Fees 517,242,500 $17,500,000 S257,500 1.49% ' Interest 250,000 250,000 0 0.00% Permits 70,000 70,000 0 0.00% Other 135,000 135,000 0 0.00% , Impact Fees 350,000 350,000 0 0.00% Contribution by Developers 500,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 600.00% Sale of Property 20,000 20,000 0 0.00% ' Bonds/Grants 13,000,000 0 (13,000,000) -100.00% Reserve Funds 16,265,689 28,242,200 11,902,511 73.63% TOTAL $47,833,189 $50,067,200 $2,160,01 I 4.67% , Explanation of revenue Sewer service fees: Sewer service fees are expected to increase $257,500 orCI 1.49%to$17,500,00o from$17,242,500 because of a slight projected increase in commercial usage as the economy improves. Interest Income: Expected to remain constant with no change. I Permit fees: Permits for construction are expected to remain constant with no change. I Other income: Changes in other income net to no difference. Impact Fees: No changes in impact fees are expected. ' Contribution by developers: This increases $3 million as a direct result of an agreement with local oil companies to reimburse the department for the I Northwest Oil Drain remediation project. Bonds/Grants: Bonds decrease <$13,000,000> as no bonds will be issued this year. ' Reserve Funds: Reserve funds of$28,168,200 will be required to provide the additional financing gap needed to assist with our capital funding. These funds are from prior years' earnings and the 2010 Bond Issue, which will directly reduce the utilities cash reserves. v.o I 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET 111/ Analysis of Expenditures The expenditure budget for the Department is proposed to increase$2,160,011 or ' 4.52%over the 2010-2011 budget. As shown below,the increase is driven by the upward change in the capital improvement program. The proposed budget for fiscal year 2011-2012 by major category is as follows:' Amended Proposed I Major Expenditure Budget Budget Category 2010-2011 2011-2011 Difference Percent Personal services S6,981,632 $7,400,593 $418,961 6.00% I Materials and supplies 1,205,310 1,217,810 12,500 1.04% Charges for services 3,676 247 3,920,197 243,950 6.64% Debt services 2,935,000 2,960,000 25,000 0.85% ' Capital improvements 30,790,500 32 280,500 1,490,000 4.84°/ Capital outlay 2 244_500 2 288,100 43,600 1.94% TOTAL $47,833,189+ $50,067,200 S2,243,011 4.67% IExplanation of expenditures I Personal Services: The proposed budget increases$418,961 from last year based on a 2% cost of living adjustment to salaries, benefits, and retirement. The remaining increase is primarily the change in total FTEs as discussed below plus 110 a transfer of an engineering position from water to assist with the Pre-treatment Program. ISewer Collection Crew Several years ago, the Department set a goal of cleaning and CCTV (Closed I Circuit Television)inspection of its collection lines to help reduce the number of sanitary sewer overflows(SSO's).These goals were set out of concern expressed by the City Council for the number and costly results of the overflows that were I taking place in the sanitary sewer system. At the time the goals were set, the Department felt that the goals were achievable with the current number of personnel,but did not take into consideration the`other work"assigned to the I same crews. To date, the goals have not been met (see charts below), and the numbers of SSOs have not been reduced,some becoming very costly as a result of restoration costs under the No Fault Ordinance. IRecently, the Department completed its Sewer Master Plan. The consultants writing the plan suggested that the Department develop a more proactive,need I based cleaning and inspection program taking into consideration age,pipe type and outside influences, i.e. trees, grease history, etc. This would require the cleaning and inspection of some parts of the system more frequent than others. After reviewing the criteria noted by the consultant and the past maintenance history of the system,a new cleaning and inspection program was written,which results in an overall increase in the goals that had been previously set. u 1 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET • In order to achieve these newly adjusted cleaning and TV inspection goals which were based on current annual production with existing personnel, the Department is requesting an additional 4 FTE's that will be required to achieve success in meeting the newly set goals. This change will result in the reduction of the number of annual SSO's. Two of these FTE's will be assigned full time to the CCTV equipment and the other two to another high pressure cleaning crew. An additional high pressure Jetter truck is also being requested. Sewer Pipe Cleaned Sewer Overflows 1,6C0,000 25 lAG0,000 20 1,200.000 1,000000 f 15 800,000 - �utcannd O 0 New Goal O 10 600.000 Old—-_ Goal F 5 2 YW.LOU - S 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ev`01"%,%4 p° !J"' A1 do '" 1'`' A�'bA^�A°' s4'0'0 A CA O O O � O`� O O O� O F Materials & Supplies: The proposed budget for materials and supplies increased $12,500. These changes are: • Non-motive parts increases $8,000 • Building supplies increases $4,500 Charges for Services: The section of charges and services increased $243,950 in the following areas • Increase in Consulting fees for pre-treatment and instrumentation $92,000 • Increase in fleet maintenance of$38,000 • Increase in fleet fuel of$36,000 • Increase of administrative fees of$30,000 • Increase in payment in lieu of taxes of$24,000 • Increase in computer maintenance costs of$17,500 • Increase in Conference and Workshop costs of $9,200 related to one-time required pipe training. • Increased costs for Utilities of$i,000 • Other various decreases of<$3,750> 12 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET Debt Service: -The annual debt service will increase $25,000 per year as the Utility issued the additional$2 million more in revenue bonds in 2010-2011 than was originally proposed because of the highly favorable interest rates. Capital Outlay: -The proposed capital outlay budget increases by$43,60o this next year as fewer small vehicles are being replaced but doubling the cost of large ' vehicle replacements with the jet truck and street sweeper. Capital Improvements:-The proposed capital improvement program will finance ' the pre-approved replacement of a major sewer trunk line on Orange Street, Northwest Oil Drain and large scale projects at the sewer treatment plant.Listed below by category are the general project types that are budgeted for fiscal 2011- 12 Proposed Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Type of Project Budget Amount Maintenance and repair shops $200,000 ' Lift Stations 1,680,000 Treatment Plant 10,760,000 Collection Lines 19,640,500 Total 2011—2012 Capital Improvement Program 532,280,500 13 I 2011/2oa2 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET III STORMWATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND 1 SUMMARY OF MAJOR BUDGET ISSUES The recommended budget for the Stormwater Fund for fiscal year 2011 — 2012 is 4! $18.6 million, an increase of 28.9% over last year. This budget proposes a bond to issue for $8 million to be used for design and construction costs of the new Folsom Stormwater line. The Folsom line will greatly reduce the impact of large ! rain or snowmelt affecting City Creek watershed drainage. I • Rate Increase - Stormwater is proposing a rate increases of 25 cents per ERU per month to generate $450,000 of revenue to fund upcoming Riparian I lib Corridor related project. Residents would pay $3 more per year and larger or commercial properties would be several times the $3, depending on the size of impervious area. I • Folsom Storm Drain - This project approved in the previous budget requires an $8 bond to fund and complete. Future projects are not expected to need debt financing nor new rate increases. jai • Riparian Corridor Projects - Recommendations to the streams of Red Butte and Emigration Creek as part of the past Riparian Corridor Study are budgeted in 2oii/12 at $959,000. These are all suggested rehab projects for the streambeds, habitat and vegetation in this corridor. The Riparian r Corridor Overlay District was created January 15, 2008 by City Council ordinance to protect vegetative zones, open ground stream beds, minimize erosion, stabilize the banks, protect water quality, enhance fish and wildlife habitat and preserve the esthetic values of the natural watercourses. I Analysis of Estimated Revenue An analysis of the estimated revenue contained in the utility's recommended I budget for the Stormwater Fund is as follows. Amended Proposed I Budget Budget Revenue 2010-2011 2011-2012 Difference Percent SP Operating Sales $7,600,000 $8,050,000 $450,000 5.92% Interest 100,000.00 100,000 0 0.00% ill Impact fees 200,000 200,000 0 0.00% Contributions by Developers 516,000 516,000 0 0.00% I Other 1,000 1,000 0 0.00% Bonds - 8,000,000 8,000,000 From(To)Reserves 6,049,117 1,847,284 (4,201,833) -69.46% 111 TOTAL $14,466,117 $18,714,284 $4,284,167 29.37% Explanation of revenue 1 Operating Sales: Sales are expected to increase $450,000 from the previous year, reflecting the $0.25 increase per equivalent residential unit. The increase is necessary to fund the riparian corridor project. 14 I 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET ID Interest Income: Interest earnings are not expected to change. ' Impact Fees: With the slow economy impact fees are unchanged. Contributions by Developers: No change is expected. ' Other Fees: No change is expected. Bonds: The proposed revenue budget includes the issuance of$8,000,00o in Ibonds in 2011—2012 for the Folsom Street Project. Reserve Funds: The Utility will use$1,714,284 from reserve funds this next year. ' Analysis by Proposed Expenditures I The expenditure budget for the Department is proposed to increase $4,248,167 or 29.4%over the 2010-2011 budgets. The proposed budget for fiscal year z011- 2012 by major expenditure category is as follows: IAmended Proposed Major Expenditure Budget Budget Difference Category 2010-2011 2011-2012 Percent Personal services $1,851,044 $1,956,611 $105,567 5.70% Materials and supplies 112,700.00 115,150 2,450 2.17% Charges for services 2,141,373 1,960,523 (180,850) -8.45% Debt Service 600,000 1,400,000 800,000 133.33% Capital improvements 9,175,500 12,693,000 3,517,500 38.34% I Capital equipment 585,500 589,000 3,500 0.60% TOTAL $14,466,117 $18,714,284 $4,248,167 29.37% IExplanation of expenditures Personal Services: The proposed budget increases$105,567 this year based on a I 2% COLA adjustment to salaries, benefits, and retirement. The remaining increase is the transfer of an Engineer IV position and expected changes to employee health benefits for a total change of 5.7%. I Materials&Supplies: Buildings supplies increases$3,000. This$3,00o increase is offset by small changes in stationary,forms,postage,laundry, and small tool costs totaling a decrease of<$550>. Charges & Services: The proposed budget for charges and service decreases <$180,850>. This decrease is related to the following categories: I • Transfers to the general fund increase(street sweeping)$15,629 • Increase of computer equipment maintenance contracts of$9,800 1111 • Increase in fleet maintenance of$66,000 • Waste disposal increases$4,700 • Travel and training increases$500 15 2011/2012 MAYOR RECOMMENDED BUDGET • Increase in employee meal expenses of$150 • Other professional and technical services decreases (Riparian Corridor , consultant) <$274,629> • Education training decreases <$1,000> , • Other various decreases <$2,000> Debt Service: The amount of debt service is expected to increase $800,000 per year with the issuance of$8,000,00o in bonds during 2011 — 2012. Capital Equipment: The proposed capital equipment budget increased by $3,500 0 over last year as a result of offsetting changes in Motive Equipment and Non- motive Equipment. Capital Improvements: The proposed budget of $12,693,000 is $3,517,500 1 greater than last year. The capital improvement budget for 2011 — 2012 includes major categories of projects as follows: p Proposed Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Type of Project Budget Amount . NN Lift Stations $410,000 Riparian Corridor Improvements 959,000 Collection Lines 11,324,000 Total 2011 —2012 Capital Improvement Program $12,693,000 Lift stations include a new 500 south surplus canal lift station for $300,000 and $100,00o for various pump replacements needed during the fiscal year. The Riparian Corridor projects are focused on rehabilitation of Red Butte Creek and Emigration Creeks based on the information provided by the recent study. In collection lines the Folsom line is 59% of the total budget or $7.5 million this year to complete. The next largest project is the Yalecrest Avenue storm line for $580,000, part of the $2.9 million for normal upgrades to existing lines. ADA ramps, crosswalks, SID (special improvement districts) and contributions to developers (that we are required to show both as revenue and expense) for a total of$650,000 are included in Collection Lines. 111 111 111 i6 Mill lig MI NIB 1111111 SIMI MI NIB OM VII MINI STAFFING SUMMARY BY FISCAL YEAR FULL TIME & FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS APPROPRIATION PROPOSED NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1980 1990 1995 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 WATER UTILITY 5101 SOURCE OF SUPPLY 11.00 13.23 13.23 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.25 11.25 11.25 11.75 5103 POWER&PUMPING 11.00 6.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 5105 PURIFICATION 51.00 43.00 42.20 47.20 47.00 47.00 47.50 47.50 47.50 46.70 47.30 46.80 45.80 45.80 46.30 5107 TRANSMISSION&DISTRIBUTION 141.00 116.87 109.15 115.35 109.70 111.70 111.50 111.70 110.70 108.70 109.20 109.20 109.70 109.10 108.10 5109 SHOPS&MAINTENANCE 48.50 33.35 29.85 27.35 32.40 31.40 30.90 30.90 30.90 30.90 29.90 29.90 29.90 29.90 28.85 5111 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTING&COLLECTIONS 49.50 52.50 49.00 53.00 51.55 51.55 50.55 49.55 49.55 48.55 48.55 48.55 46.55 46.55 46.60 5113 WATER ADMINISTRATION 13.00 8.50 10.00 14.00 12.00 11.90 12.40 11.90 11.90 11.90 12.40 12.90 12.90 13.40 12.40 5113 PUBLIC UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 WATER UTILITY TOTAL 325.00 274.75 257.73 273.45 269.20 270.10 269.90 267.60 266.60 262.80 263.40 262.90 259.90 259.80 257.80 SEWER UTILITY 5220 LIFT STATIONS 5.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5230 COLLECTION SYSTEM 32.00 28.98 35.80 27.92 27.45 27.45 27.05 26.50 26.50 26.20 25.95 25.95 26.25 26.25 29.75 5260 RECLAMATION PLANT 55.00 62.00 62.40 64.90 64.90 64.90 63.90 65.90 65.90 65.90 64.50 63.50 62.50 62.50 63.50 5280 ACCOUNTING&CUSTOMER SERVICE 2.00 5.00 2.80 1.80 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 5290 SEWER ADMINISTRATION 2.00 5.00 3.70 3.25 3.25 2.85 2.60 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.45 3.85 4.50 4.75 4.75 5290 PUBLIC UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.40 0.40 0.40 SEWER UTILITY TOTAL 96.00 108.98 110.50 103.67 102.60 102.20 100.55 101.60 101.60 101.30 99.90 100.30 99.85 100.10 104.60 STORM WATER 5240 STORM WATER MAINTENANCE 12.50 13.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 5240 STORM WATER ENGINEERING&GIS 4.90 10.08 10.70 10.70 10.30 9.75 9.75 9.55 9.30 9.30 9.50 9.50 9.00 5240 STORM WATER ADMINISTRATIVE 2.40 3.15 3.15 2.65 2.40 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.55 2.65 2.90 3.15 3.15 5240 STORM WATER QUALITY 1.30 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.80 3.80 STORM WATER TOTAL 21.10 28.68 28.30 27.80 27.15 26.50 26.50 26.30 26.30 26.40 26.85 27.70 28.20 PUBLIC UTILITIES TOTAL 421.00 383.73 389.33 405.80 400.10 400.10 397.60 395.70 394.70 390.40 389.60 389.60 386.60 387.60 390.60 IT3U© CTU[1— HUGKIFRI2 ©I ��0� � rU I ©L1 EAG3 • Water & Sewer Stormwater 425 #of Employees +Blue Stakes Increases Decreases Heist Management audit 1. Contracting for services 1. Engineers for CIP 2. Regulatory requirements 2. Consolidation 3. One-person shifts at water treatment plants 3. Water Conservation 4. Used seasonal employees for seasonal work Decreases 'l` 5. Reorganization of Water Reclamation Plant 1. Contracted for Asphalt 2. Office&technical & 400 Budgeted 11 11 111 375 11111 350 - - - illhj 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Water&Sewer 421 425 425 391 388 391 392 392 390 389 388 379 378 377 372 368 365 372 380 376 377 373 372 372 370 369 364 363 363 360 360 360 363 Storm 16 14 16 18 21 28 28 31 30 29 29 29 28 28 27 27 27 27 27 27 28 28 Co #of Water 4§' h 0 �.� o,� 00 coo `V0 40 4,0 ti cow co`n ^,� ^"O o,`� �.� cow 07 h~ hh 0� p0 ^� �0 ^0 h0 Connections ry e? tO `11 '� 0 h 0 " eo h ^� co ry h ^ ^� ry �1, o ^� ^ o� o� o� N N ^0. ^0. 00� 00 Al.`, AT AO' a7^ tY 0b' 0h 0fO' q�O' c>> �b�' c°j' AT oo` off` oo' 0, of, o,,'' o,, oo 0, 0, 0, oo A 1 I T * t R P ! t * 1 1 Or--11 q ,'.y,,- as ., c �4K1 ,s t:r 'r: A PR . �: 4 E PERSONNEL S D ADJUSTMENTS I I I I Prior 2011 (FTE) budget 259.8 100.1 27.7 387.6 Changes for proposed Budget: a) Additional Sewer Collection Crew I__________ 4 b) Eliminate Warehouse Supervisor -1 -1 c) 1/2 FTE Watershed Seasonal 0.5 0.5 d) 1/2 FTE Canal Seasonal 0.5 0.5 e) Transfer of Engineer IV &V -1 -0.5 -0.5 -2 f) Transferred Engineer IV: Stormwater Mgr. 1 1 g) Transferred Engineer V: Pre-treatment Mgr. 11.1111111 1 1 h)Payroll position transfer to HR -1 -1 i) Eliminate one meter reader -1 -1 j) New Customer Service Rep. 1 1 co Sewer Pipe Cleaned 1600000 - ,. 1400000 - 1200000 - imamemm, --...mmi..- 111111111=M1111 AMMINIIMIP �- 1000000 800000 i ENNEI LF Cleaned milms.New Goal 600000 Old Goal 400000 200000 0 1 I I w 00SZ lilt 0 00� N 00 .O O O O 4.,0 W Col ON -.1 00 •D O IN) 4 0 I irivillopeto .11.41 11 IP•1•111 NIB MINI elle INN MIN IIIIIII Q11111 MIS MOULIJLOI1' G ° LL 0 NEI MEL D ED 3y D 40,000 37,500 35,000 Ii 32,500 - "' I ' ■ Budgeted 30,000 I - - It!'"I I 27,500 - - - - 25,000 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 �anibDnc� Uffleea 0 ?ezzeng Reverchu© M Millions $60 1111E1111111111111111 11111 • WATER II $30 IIIIIII1111I111111 Ell STORM $10 $0 1111111111111111111111111 9596979899 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 WATER UTILITY oTT ° AflN CG Cana $50,000,000 I Metro Assessment $40,000,000 I '__ = o Lien of Tax Fee City Admin.Fees $30,000,000 _ _� - II ' ■Water Purchases $20,000,000 111111111111111111 Charges&Services $10,000,000 ■O& M $0 •Salaries 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 N 5ewef Starmwstef Op ithns Coate $14 $+z f 1111111iiiMIIIIIIMIU1111111111 PA lin 111.111 ! MN PillkQ;(111)1-1I �I ' � J � WATETR 1 � 1q� t � • $ 414,247 • Salaries: Merit 2.1%, Insurance 10%, Retirement 4%, 2% Cola — Transferred out 3 full-time, added 1 seasonal • Increase in Books and Supplies • $ 3 000 • Increase Operation & Maint.: Asphalt $100,000, • $ 225,150 Bldg mat. $44,000, water materials $80,000 and $1,150 for tools • Increase in Computer Maint. Contracts • $ 41,700 • Increase in Metropolitan Water District — Rate increase of$13 aver per acre foot ( $332 summer/$216 $ 380 000 winter) • • Decrease in Postage, Chemicals and PrintingCosts • $ (-63,050) _ N D: 1_03 CHANGES WATER---CONT. • Increase in Utility Costs • $ 98,700 • Increase Point of Mt. Pump Costs • $ 35,000 • Increase in Professional Services • $ 82,899 — Legal fees$250,000 of total budget • Increase in Fleet Fuel costs • $ 40,000 • Increase in Administrative Service Fee • $ 10,000 • Decrease in various Other Expense • • Total increases ( 2.7% increase in 1,259,982 O&M) $ Li t. ! . 1 D1U \QUCD HR UB ui)(;E'r EC J ANGF • Salaries • $ 418,961 — Increases of 10% in insurance, 4% in retirement costs & 2% merit — 4 new collection workers at a costs of$231,072 — Reallocate one engineer for pre-treatment $112,300 • Materials/Supplies • $ 12,500 — Increase in parts and building supplies • Increase in Consulting services • — Pre-treatment consulting and instrumentation $ 92000 • Increase in Travel/Training • $ 9,200— One time increase for (PAPC) pipeline assessment certification program • Increase in Utilities • $ 1,000 ELLQUal BUDGET CHANGES SEWER—coNT. • Increase in Fleet fuel & repairs • $ 74,000 • Increase in Admin Fees • $ 30,000 • Increase in Pilot (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) • $ 24 000 • Increase in Computer Maintenance. $ 17,500 • Other various decreases • $ ( -3,750) • Total increases ( 5% increase in O&M) • $ 675,411 I 10 [ 1 11 11 11 11 PLE1QUG)IIR IBiJDGET CHANGES STORMWA! I1 • salaries: - 10% insurance, 4% retirement increase, 2% merits, 2% cola and • $ 105,567 transfer of engineer from water to Stormwater manager • Increase in Materials and Supplies • $ 2,450 • Increase in Street Sweeping paid to the City • $ 15,629 • Increase in Fleet Fuel and Maintenance • $ 66,000 • Increase in Computer Maintenance • $ 9,800 • Increase in Travel and Training • $ 500 • Decrease in Consulting Fees (Riparian Corridor) • $ (-274,629) • Increase in waste disposal • $ 4,700 • Decrease in Charges and Services • $ ( - 2,850) • Total increase (3.4% decrease in O&M) • $ ( - 138,833) Co C©muoni cf Ezf ig a id Iza cod My ant :B -,.loci IF e City County Meter Size Existing(a, b) Proposed(a,b) Existing(a,b) Proposed(a,b) inches 3/4 & 1 $7.79 $8.29 $10.34 $10.84 1 1/2 9.29 9.79 12.36 12.86 2 10.13 10.63 13.50 14.00 3 17.34 17.84 23.24 23.74 4 18.60 19.10 24.94 25.44 6 27.08 27.58 36.38 36.88 8 49.08 49.58 66.09 66.59 10 91.44 91.94 123.27 123.77 ,,, (a) Includes water purchases fee o (b) Base fee by meter size varies based on meter replacement cost ratios to a 334"meter A 1110, WO MI M ! On Compaaon.aCE 13fWitr Rztea 7,7n. 111 the Tn.ce thED VñuuihL°0 t Iqid1 a Price Per Gallon Current SLC Water $0.0018 Proposed SLC Water $0.0019 Coffee(black) $1.51 Clorine bleach $2.20 Soda 2-liter $2.37 Lowfat milk $2.50 ■Price Per Gallon Unleaded gasoline $2.51 Bottled Water(24 ct) $3.15 Automotive antifreeze $4.19 Coffee creamer $5.54 Soft-drink concentrate $8.20 4 Beer $8.85 $- $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 $9.00 $10.00 • Comparison of Residential Water Bills 5/8" Meter, 10 CCF (Memphis Light,Gas and Water;Fall Publication 2010 Utility Bill Comparisons for Selected U.S Memphis,TN $13.10 Cities) Orlando,FL INE111111 $13.71 Huntsville,AL $14.70 Chicago,IL $15.03 Little Rock,AR $16.47 Salt Lake City,UT $17 09 Salt Lake Proposed S17.59 Milwaukee,WI $18.79 Phoenix,AZ $19.12 Nashville,TN 11M111111 =INIIIMMINIMI $20.58 New Orleans,LA $21.47 Jacksonville,FL $22.19 Austin,TX $23.06 Cincinnati,OH $23.64 San Antonio,TX $24.98 St.Louis,MO $25.65 Louisville,KY $26.09 Oklahoma City,OK $27.33 Springfield,MO $27.40 Columbus,OH ' $28.72 Reno,NV $28.80 Indianapolis,IN _ . $29.27 New York,NY $29.50 Knoxville,TN $29.70 Jackson,TN $29.88 Chattanooga,TN $30.93 Olive Branch,TN $33.76 Clewiston,FL $35.25 Marietta,GA $35.50 Philadelphia,PA $35.79 Los Angeles,CA $37.40 Boston,MA $38.86 Co Bellevue,MA $39.79 N Seattle,WA $47.56 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 ,;11111111 MI I) NM I I !M A 11 A PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AREA WATER RATE COMPARISON - DECEMBER, 2010 MONTHLY MINIMUM RATE OVER MONTHLY WINTER @ SUMMER @ TOTAL TOTAL YEARLY TAX MINIMUM ALLOWANCE MINIMUM PER FLOURIDE 7,480 GAL 23,936 GAL WINTER SUMMER ON$200,000 TOTAL RANKING CITY OR DISTRICT NAME CHARGE IN GALLONS ALLOWANCE GALLONS CHARGE PER MONTH PER MONTH CHARGES* CHARGES* PROPERTY CHARGES 1 PARK CITY-GRADUATED RATES(1) 25.23 0 3.14-5.04 1,000 58.29 136.37 408.04 681.84 1089.88 2 MAGNA-GRADUATED RATES(2) 14.31 6,000 1.35-1.51 1,000 1.68 17.99 41.15 143.90 164.61 473.60 782.12 3 SOUTH JORDAN CITY-GRADUATED RATES(3) 34.88 0 1.64-1.84 1,000 47.15 76.92 377.18 307.69 684.87 o 4 DRAPER CITY-GRADUATED RATES(4) 20.25 0 1.69-3.04 1,000 35.74 83.27 285.95 333.06 619.01 5 SANDY CITY-OUTSIDE OF CITY 31.04 8,000 1.47-2.70 1,000 0.80 31.84 74.87 222.88 374.34 597.22 6 SANDY CITY-INSIDE OF CITY(9) 22.37 8,000 1.36-2.45 1,000 0.80 23.17 62.21 162.19 311.07 83.80 557.06 7 KEARNS IMPROVEMENT DIST-GRADUATED RATES(5) 9.00 0 1.78-2.18 1,000 22.31 57.18 178.52 228.72 114.88 522.12 8 AMERICAN FORK(6) 20.50 6,000 2.00-3.31 1,000 23.46 74.96 187.68 299.83 487.51 9 SALT LAKE CITY-OUTSIDE OF CITY 10.84 0 1.26-2.80 748 23.44 67.38 187.52 269.52 457.04 10 OGDEN CITY-GRADUATED RATES(7) 14.16 0 1.29-2.26 1,000 25.74 62.46 205.95 249.82 455.77 11 SALT LAKE CITY-INSIDE OF CITY (9) 8.29 0 0.93-2.08 748 17.59 50.15 140.72 200.60 82.80 424.12 12 WEST JORDAN CITY 19.39 0 1.08 1,000 27.47 45.24 219.75 180.96 400.71 13 CITY OF SOUTH SALT LAKE 16.05 5,000 1.82 1,000 2.00 22.56 52.51 180.51 210.05 390.56 14 GRANGER-HUNTER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 6.00 0 1.45 1,000 16.85 40.71 134.77 162.83 68.50 366.10 15 JVWCD 2.50 0 1.19-1.49 1,000 11.40 38.16 91.21 152.66 82.00 325.87 16 MURRAY CITY 7.21 0 0.89-1.28 748 16.11 48.17 128.88 192.68 321.56 17 RIVERTON CITY 20.70 10,000 1.29 1,000 20.70 38.68 165.60 154.71 320.31 18 PLEASANT GROVE-GRADUATED RATES(8) 9.45 5,000 1.26-2.63 1,000 12.57 48.45 100.60 193.81 294.41 19 BOUNTIFUL CITY-RESIDENTIAL HIGH ELEVATION 11.82 5,000 1.20 1,000 14.80 34.54 118.37 138.17 256.54 20 TAYLORSVILLEIBENNION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2.00 0 1.35 1,000 12.10 34.31 96.78 137.25 16.30 250.34 21 BOUNTIFUL CITY-RESIDENTIAL LOW ELEVATION 10.73 5,000 1.08 1,000 13.41 31.18 107.27 124.72 231.99 22 OREM 10.41 0 0.58 1,000 14.75 24.29 117.99 97.17 215.16 23 PROVO 8.47 0 0.358-0.60 748 12.05 27.67 96.40 110.68 207.08 •BASED ON EIGHT MONTHS WINTER AND FOUR MONTHS SUMMER EXCEPT PARK CITY 8 SANDY WHICH ARE SEVEN MONTHS WINTER AND FIVE MONTHS SUMMER (1)RATES ARE 83.14/THOUSAND FOR 0-5,000 GALLONS,$5,04/THOUSAND FOR 5,001-30,000 GAL IN SUMMER AND$4.42/THOUSAND IN WINTER (2)RATES ARE$14.31 FOR 0.8,000 GALLONS,$1.35/THOUSAND FOR 6,001-18,000 GALLONS,6$1.51/THOUSAND FOR 18,001-35,000 GALLONS (3)RATES ARE 81.84/THOUSAND FOR 0-10,000 GALLONS AND$1.84/THOUSAND FOR 10,001-28,000 GAL W (4)RATES ARE$1.69/THOUSAND FOR 0-5,000 GALLONS,82.84/THOUSAND FOR 5,001-20,000 GAL,&$3.04/THOUSAND FOR 20,001.50,000 GAL. W (5)RATES ARE$1.78/THOUSAND FOR 0-10,000 GALLONS&$2.16/THOUSAND FOR 10,0001-25,000 GALLONS p (8)RATES ARE$20.50 FOR 0-6,000 GALLONS,$2.00/THOUSAND FOR 8,001-8,000 GALLONS,52.50/THOUSAND FOR 8,001-10,000 GALLONS,$3.00/THOUSAND FOR 10,001.12,000 GALLONS,6$3.31/THOUSAND OVER 12,000 GAL (7)RATES ARE 81.29/THOUSAND FOR 0-5,000 GALLONS,$2.07/THOUSAND FOR 5,001.10,000 GAL,&82.28/THOUSAND FOR 10,001-25,000 GAL. (8)RATES ARE$9.45 FOR 0-5,000 GALLONS,81.26/THOUSAND FOR 5,001-10,000 GALLONS,$1.84/THOUSAND FOR 10,001-15,000 GALLONS,&82.63/THOUSAND FOR 15,001-50,000 GALLONS (9)INCULDES METROPOLITAN WATER PROPERTY TAX C Mp of l no®Bn meonc ennttoi Il WwotewAteir I832kk 110 0CC Ili Light,Gas and Water;Fall Publication 2010 Utility Bill Comparisons for Selected U.S Chicago,IL MN $12.93 Cities) Salt Lake City,UT S13.80 Omaha,NE $18.45 Milwaukee,WI $19.14 Springfield,MO $19.54 Memphis,TN $19.96 San Antonio,TX $20.07 Oklahoma City,OK M1111111111111111111111 $23.57 Phoenix,AZ $26.71 Indianapolis,IN $28.09 Reno,NV $30.30 St.Louis,MO $31.90 Los Angeles,CA MIIIINIMINE $32.70 Clewiston,FL $32.75 Jackson,TN 111 $36.43 Louisville,KY $37.36 Columbus,OH $37.80 Huntsville,AL $38.08 Philadelphia,PA $38.99 Little Rock,AR $40.09 Olive Branch,TN $41.11 New Orleans,LA $41.82 Nashville,TN $42.59 New York,NY ■-I I-- $46.90 Marietta,GA $49.40 Jacksonville,FL I I I $49.76 Boston,MA $50.31 Austin,TX $57.72 Cincinnati,OH $58.33 Bellevue,WA $58.40 Knoxville,TN ' $75.21 Chattanooga,TN $77.17 Seattle,WA $89,80 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 $55 $60 $65 $70 $75 $80 $85 $90 $95 1 111 I f 1 P 1 1 1 1 1 II 11 III I 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 Al OM le icy EN r um Storm Water Rate Increase Annual Impact on Selected Residential Customers Equivalent CURRENT Proposed Rate Difference ACCOUNT Residential RATES Increase TYPE UNITS $4.24 per ERU $4.49 per ERU $0.25 per ERU SMALL RESIDENTIA 1 $ 50.88 $ 53.88 $3.00 L 5.9% increase AVERAGE RESIDENTIA 1 $50.88 $53.88 $3.00 L 5.9% increase wins Large g 1.4 $ 71.23 $ 75.48 $4.25 RESIDENT 5.9% increase Dairy 152 $ 7,734 $ 8,189 $455.00 5.9% increase $ 63.00 Commercial 21 $ 1,068 1,131 5.9% increase Industrial 300 $ 15,264 $ 16,164 $900.00 5.9% increase Local Stormwater Rate Comparisons MONTHLY RANKING CITY OR DISTRICT NAME CHARGE 1 OGDEN CITY $6.27 2 AMERICAN FORK $6.00 3 SANDY CITY $5.35 4 SOUTH JORDAN CITY $5.00 5 OREM $4.75 6 SALT LAKE CITY $4.49 7 PROVO $4.03 8 BOUNTIFUL CITY $4.00 9 DRAPER CITY $4.00 10 TAYLORSVILLE CITY $4.00 11 MURRAY CITY $3.55 12 PLEASANT GROVE $3.00 As of Dec.31,2010 W ty IPS Poll MO MO Mill MIS elli MIS JhE@@ Yiw IF ® ©© © goEIJ 300,000.00 Fuel Usage in Gallons, Public Utilities 250,000.00 .v xt hr r�-r , 200,000.00 —._-__.___..__.___. "� /•;-� ■ •• 100,000.00 .• riX. 50,000.00 y J�� ie` sc ,oe� �ea� O c r c� a 01 J c\e , J oe o � cc t a QQ �` Q- 'ce OC 1 <e'e Oee — FY 2009 —C —FY 2010 ��FY 2011 (Actual) FY 2011 (Forecast) ••• •• 20%Reduction from 2009 } Public Utilities Trend in Vehicle Run vs. Idle Time 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 1.5 1 0.5 1111 Hours 0 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 mil Ave Run Time inn Ave Idle Time —Idle Time Trend co co 1 w r I try i t . w r---Tr' -----i r--1 r7 F i—r- 1 r i r-1 0 - - 1 r i r a r-1 P-a r 1 r - , r-1 39.11tt II,al1e City "Public tUdTh tines Debit Cervilahg fair Current and Futriare Yeasee Tarr®LxLitraln Wet©m keeecomerrntr and 1E t midi 18,000,000 - " 16,000,000 -' 14,000,000 I r Bond by issue year 12,000,000 - l I III I I II I I 2014 10,000,000 I I I I I I I I I 2012 8,000,000 I I I II I I I U I 2011 6,000,000 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 11 • 2009 4,000,000 - - I I I I I I I I I 2005 2,000,0001 I I II I II I I I I p 2004 0 - .f ■ METRO W 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PUBLIC UTILITIES FEES AND CHARGES PAID TO THE GENERAL FUND FOR SERVICES RENDERED OR COLLECTED BY CITY ORDINANCE ACTUAL June 30,2010 June 30.2010 June 30.2010 Public Utilities j FY PROPOSED ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS June 30,2010 FY 2010/2011 2011/2012 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES WATER SEWER STORM TOTALS BUDGET BUDGET Administrative Service Fees(General Fund) Human Resources $ 153,033 $ 37,717 $ 20,090 $ 210,840 $ 226,184 $ 226,184 City Attorney 146,217 11,475 12,751 170,443 182,847 182,847 Accounting/Finance 112,707 40,788 8,722 162,217 174,022 0 174,022 Purchasing&Contracts 47,667 21,436 2,783 71,886 77,117 77,117 City Recorders 35,949 4,932 1,723 42,604 45,704 0 45,704 Property Management 104,743 6,200 314 111,257 119,354 119,354 Budget and Policy 31,007 7,793 2,711 41,511 44,532 44,532 Non-discretionary IMS Costs 27,311 9,011 4,353 40,675 43,635 % 43,635 Treasurer's Office(cash mgt.) 10,356 8,161 181 18,698 20,059 % 20,059 City Council 4,435 2,101 233 6,769 7,262 7,262 Mayor 16,729 9,815 9,592 36,136 38,766 38,766 Community Affairs 2,479 1,403 1,263 5,145 5,519 5,519 Total Admin Fees $ 692,633 $ 160,832 $ 64,716 $ 918,181 $ 985,000 ej 985,000 Tax or Fee Authorized ----------T-- ---- - - Payment in Lieu-of-Taxes (General Fund) 320,632 385,082 130,268 835,982 798,000 0 822,000 Franchise Fees (General Fund) 2,172,032 930,871 - 3,102,903 3,097,060 0 3,117,000 Franchise Fee on Stormwater(General Fund) - - - - 450,000 0 456,000 Sub Total $ 2,492,664 $ 1,315,953 $ 130,268 $ 3,938,885 $ 4,345,060 $ 4,395,000 i Internal Service Fund Services r, Fleet Mgt.Services $ 1,087,230 $ 267,954 $ 230,305 $ 1,585,489 $ 1,626,000 j$ 1,626,000 City Data Processing (IMS) 380,722 175,949 149,908 706,579 840,000 0 840,000 Risk Mgt.Admininstrative Fees(Gov.Immunity) 130,705 7,469 46,381 184,555 181,700 181,700 Risk Management Premiums&Charges 717,264 184,302 104,809 1,006,375 948,200 948,200 Sub Total 2,315,921 635,674 531,403 3,482,998 3,595,900 I 3,595,900 Special Associated Charges(indirect benefit) - - IFAS Maintenance(online financial system) 38,849 30,121 1,903 70,873 71,903 '� 71,903 Street Sweeping (leaf bags and sweeping) - - 236,000 236,000 240,000 240,000 Street Sweeping (1/2 of program) - - 175,371 175,371 384,371 r. 400,000 Leaf Bags(General Fund) - - 34,890 34,890 34,890' - Trails Coordinator(1st payment 2009)New 37,500 - - 37,500 37,500 r:' 37,500 C Sub Total $ 37,500 $ - $ 446,261 $ 483,761 $ 768,664 ' $ 749,403 o, TOTAL FEES,TAXES AND CHARGES$ 5,538,718 $ 2,112,459 $ 1,172,648 $ 8,823,825 $ 9,694,624 $ 9,725,303 On WAWA MID an OM I= MO MI t 1 MI an me am um me .. . .. ins we I I 1 11111 ciivim iiiarir 0 1. Master Plan — Water valve replacement program. a) $1 million in various locations throughout the City 2. Orange Street Sewer Trunk line to Treatment Plant a) $10 million funded through revenue bonds 3. Digester Covers for Waste Treatment Plant a) $9.4 million over several fiscal years 4. Oil Drain EPA Remediation Canal a) $4.5 million budget with $3 million reimbursed by local oil companies which involves removal of contaminated soil. 5. Storm drain lines — Folsom & Yalecreat Avenue a) Folsom Storm drain line is a pre-budgeted $9.4 million project funded through an $8 million bond issue last year. Budget this year is $7.5 million. b) $580,000 for the new Yalecrest Avenue storm line that will help drain 100 acres working in conjunction with concrete street reconstruction by Community and Economic Development. <7, rs + .• •• w • - Valve Replacement Program • = • ti• ~ • • The valve program is part of a master plan project •p '~ • / to replace an ever expanding number of aged and non-functioning water values in the Salt Lake City service area. • •• Mf • -w..r • • n • h••n • / } • Valve RepairrReplace $1,000,000 budget Project # 51-3800030 __an-- ! ion as Li me r I — ® U OKI SO.- I 114 / i I D o 0y o iroiir • y ounk rns ectnon. • How often should we inspect storage reservoirs and tanks? EVE , „ E ERI 5 1 O 10 YEARS — DUE 1 IIIS YEAR jg�� l ��(- r' iirl 1 d ir 4 PI r. t \,3`• _ -i r . om • ., . . , .., 4,•.-_,,,,- le. -- ,, , itill ,`'.' ' 3900 SOUTH TANK FAILURE- LOSE OF HOME ';' .. ' M .► f s .4 1 ssT" r 1`.. .Y. `rt� .si r elliper -' .-... ,„_,_-_--: ::•._.::.:11. -'-' . ' ''''k - ...' . ,...,-. --�co SAMPLE OF TANK CORROSION � � _ __._ DIY �� %f-.'."� WASTE WATER RECLAMATION PLANT OF �_ ;; ', Replace 3 Digester Covers: _ k • Begun in 2009, project costs are = i- . anticipated to be $9.4 million. „ ' Y 5 Proposed funds for fiscal 2011/12 - to finish the project will be _.,� __ , $500,000. Contractor is Gerber '¢��•� _ t __ r -r Construction. - _ "7 �` a `� _ .�� . �►�_+`: Replace With 3 new gas ak a i A Fikal 11Pre- 7. holder liquid seal covers 7 : _flo'-r— ;, Project# 52-4905232 41. 41. , . , , / mooll ' -=-. 1 ....r -.4 , , ,., : - _' . : . . L .,.._ ....., ...... i-.-111 11-_3 li.. iii mr---ali i 3 �� Lama s i -4 E Ai - __3 fir-.ill i AN 10 NIB I MN NMI MI( ■. l 1' Cull D in .PQ Rernediation $4.5 MILLION The Northwest Oil Drain Canal (NWOD Canal), , 40, situated in the northern area of Salt Lake City, is a part of Salt Lake City Department of Public �;1,�, ,. Utilities'drainage system. Notably, the NWOD „w " Canal is the discharge point for Salt Lake City's �'� , '." ,. Wastewater Reclamation Facility, and plays a f't' j. `i• '� a role in flood mitigation for Rose Park and other ,y tit ,, ` • !j "*tLr areas of the City. c: ii;j,'.' I,' 'f.d of . i.v r; 'Alb. •r , The NWOD Canal Remediation Project is a I ` .. -- fr legacy environmental clean-up effort. The 'tiik,ry it :� :,-. t NWOD Canal contains petroleum-contaminated ' , '•� ''% jt sediment along a three mile reach. The .It '-vR remediation of the contaminated sediment is ill-.-- being conducted pursuant to an EPA order Some removal of the contaminated sediment -t" ' .. ' s ip� was conducted in 2004-2006; however this '''' • -,�'•. k r.` initial remediation effort did not meet EPA's °�' ' o Dram N �. +- cleanup criteria, and additional work is required Nill. 4 ,:v ` by both EPA and UDEQ. I �. '`` ti* t ' The remediation cost is shared pursuant to a I�rrdo; Cost Allocation Agreement between BP, ''.' _' 'I' gt Chevron, and Salt Lake City. The$4.5 million ,a � budget reflects the total estimated project cost '� '`` ' in which 30.7% is Salt Lake City's responsibility ,:9 ..> r h ,!! per the Cost Allocation Agreement. ' r. 2100 North" 1 "•' Remediation of the contaminated sediment of r 4 . l( the first 3,000 feet of the NWOD Canal (Segment r aj. IA „� 1)will occur during summer/fall 2011, with Salt li ,' i e 4 , I -A Lake City being the contracting entity. ar • CA Remediation of the remaining segments of the II NWOD Canal (Segments 2 and 3)are expected 1 to occur during the 2012 construction season. ' 00AH© TMA 1 RYS[ MInE3 GRAPH FROM HORTH ref MFIL, BOO SEWER RE©LAMAT 1 Il PLAID ,, y� Capital Improvement Prof et/ $10 Million Budget d["a Replacement Sanitary Sewer lain North Temple to Pre-Treatment Plant Funded by Revenue Bonds n y} r f - �� 4" ,i , received and approved in 2010. .tit.: 'J 11 3 R., y' _ ' ,t. :i , _ —I u- ;; ,� This major 48" re-enforced concrete trunkline is currently in design by Black & Veatch Corp. Design work and rehab of • i existing pipe will be in 2010/11 and most of the 2 mile project will ' 'o. .4 take place without affecting customers or roads. Slip lining { - I e ■�'' ,, •�. , - techniques are expected to be the major method of repair. Extreme H2S pipe corrosion (Hydrogen Sulfide) MI gin MIN I( I I III .. MI all ®t.a — o-oom Qocrao MCDTEM oTg[ln Budget of $7.5 million With the recent removal of the railroad tracks on Folsom Avenue, the City has the unique opportunity to create a vibrant new corridor along Folsom Avenue from 1-15 to the Jordan River. There is a variety of uses for the Folsom Corridor, including a trail from the Jordan River to Gateway, a water PHASE I The current,funded project involves installing a new storm drain culvert feature, shopping and retail, and a new from North Temple to the Jordan River along the Folsom corridor(see neighborhood park. These improvements map).The purpose of this project is to convey runoff from the City Creek may be phased in over time, according to watershed and North Temple to the Jordan River, in order to provide adequate drainage capacity during large rain and snowmelt events. City priorities and funding. Completing the storm drain culvert project in a timely manner will be especially important given the upcoming completion of the North Temple TRAX line. Design is progressing and currently construction is anticipated during the fall of 2011. I SOUTH TEMPLE % . . ,' / . �. -,,, -b a UNION PACIFIC RAIL CORRIDOR «,.,„ Q j . , TO 3 - - 7, n�I��% , , .a cr 1 a: FOLSOM AVENUE C 'O ,R 4 I D O R t SECTION SECTION C �"i SECTION B SECTION d / " -' , 4� c N tu IA1IrukIU N ISMAMerxnW ,l I / 1 J. . y► * a r.�.0 H s �_. , ; a.M�a.Nb ar4 s .. = y_ , v 0 , hlirr.r, amilika! so r- urt arms r as a_ • :,. .r . FoAaorn A @gas Ma Dr ah Cof j MEaRatrpElam Fm'act • Budget: $$$ ? (Future) PHASE II—City Funded Portion The City has Identified this corridor as a prime area for a future trail or parkway.Using a shared vision approach the engineers will design the culvert without impacting the area's potential for expected future .z improvements.Considerable planning by City departments and master plan studies were part of the design package.SLC Public Utilities is working to advance the vision of the parkway project. The future trail/parkway/retail project is intended to be constructed by other City departments once plans are complete and funding becomes available. 11111 iS .1.11IIIII Phase II—Trails,Parkway,shopping and Retail OD grlaf 1! !� 11 II 11 / 1 1 II t 1 1 i 1 1 ■ I` 1 ri rI r1 _ ri I -1 al i ? ll NM / i ! l • 1 !Jr 11111- 11■ it, YEII@C[ Chet QM®nus Mom o rrEArn ^h(ob Ctv Co.ja�woo. L NTPROE of STORM I DRAINaming REPLACEMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 3011"13 YALECREST AVENUE(1080 S(•1500 EAST TO 1700 EAST Joint project with y 4 Community �° and K 4 Economic �. ., I Development .,. }. ` X� t Lug-' ti Project in conjunction with CED for concrete street reconstruction for Yalecrest and Princeton Avenues. 1Cost of $580,000 for a new storm drain that will accommodate a 100 acre area . 2000 linear ft. of 36" pipe .0106 • AWWA - Benchmarkin • Indicators Years 2010 2009 2008 2007 Low Med High Debt Ratio 13.7% 13.8% 14.8% 13.9% 21% 32% 46% 0 Return on Assets 3.09% 3.94% 4.58% 5.10% .9% 2% 5.1% 0 O&M costs per $1,382 $1,341 $1,307 $1,231 $863 $1,431 $2,089 0 Water MG Processed Direct costs of $394 $398 $399 $346 $245 $500 $781 0 Water Treatment per MG Direct costs of $487 $449 $444 $444 $622 $924 $1,471 0 Sewer Treatment per MG O&M cost per $879 $824 $807 $766 $1,067 $1,960 $2,616 0 Sewer MG Processed Employee Safety 30.41 53.3 5.66 21.2 5 21.2 81.4 A Severity Rate - - - ...,, AWWA - Benchmarkin ' Indicators 1 Years 2010 2009 2008 2007 Low Med High MGD Water 0.31 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.15 0.24 0.33 0 Delivered per Employee MGD Sewer 0.29 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.20 0.27 0.36 0 Processed per Employee Billing Accuracy 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.6 7.1 16.1 0 v Errors per 10,000 bills Complaints per 5.2 4.99 4.86 4.85 0.8 5.2 18.6 AVG 1 ,000 customers Technical Quality 1 .36 1 .38 1 .59 1 .08 2.3 6.2 16.4 0 Complaints per 1 ,000 customers Training Hours per 19.1 16.2 18.1 17.7 17.3 22.8 34.8 AVG Employee Customer Service $33.66 $35.67 $34.63 $32.64 $31 .96 $42.03 $64.64 Q Cost per Account I WATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY Ili FY 2012-14 Rate increase: $0.50 per connection per month. Rate increase 6% Rate increase 6% AMENDED PROJECTED PROPOSED FORECAST FORECAST ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET SOURCES 2009-2010 2010-11 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 I REVENUES METERED SALES $50,993,462 $52,559,850 $52,559,850 $53,059,850 $55,713,441 $59,056,247 INTEREST INCOME 434,780 300,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 200,000 II OTHER REVENUES 2,909,199 2,591,000 2,591,000 2,585,402 2,617,950 2,651,149 TOTAL REVENUES $54,337,441 $55,450,850 $55,450,850 $55,895,252 $58,531,391 $61,907,396 OTHER SOURCES GRANTS&OTHER RELATED REVENUES $1,549,329 $905,000 $905,000 $1,205,000 $905,000 $905,000 IMPACT FEES 1,455,399 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 I OTHER SOURCES 144,119 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 BOND PROCEEDS 5,500,000 - TOTAL OTHER SOURCES $3,148,847 $1,455,000 $1,455,000 $1,755,000 $6,955,000 $1,455,000 iT 0 T A L SOURCES $57,486.288 $56,905,850 $56,905.850 $57,650,252 $65,486,391 $63.362,396 EXPENSES&OTHER USES 1 EXPENDITURES PERSONAL SERVICES $16,117,997 $16,357,187 $16,357,187 $16,771,434 $16,939,147 $17,108,539 OPERATING&MAINTENANCE 2,740,398 2,760,545 2,760,545 2,921,735 2,980,170 3,039,753 TRAVEL&TRAINING 45,266 53,239 53,239 53,239 54,303 55,388 UTILITIES 1,852,273 2,070,518 2,070,518 2,169.218 2,212,604 2,256,853 PROF&CONTRACT SERVICES 1,849,391 2,078,251 2,078,251 2,160,650 2,203,863 2,247,940 DATA PROCESSING 280,145 440,000 440,000 440,000 448,800 457,776 FLEET MAINTENANCE 932,210 1,120,000 1,120,000 1,160,000 1,142,400 1,165,248 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FEE 692,633 720,000 720,000 730,000 744,600 759,492 PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES 320,066 371,000 371,000 371,000 378,420 385,988 I METRO.WATER PURCH&TREAT 8,380,696 11,169,000 11,169,000 11,549,000 12,152,000 12,758,000 METRO ASSESSMENT(CAPITAL) 7,021,892 7,021,892 7,021,892 7,021,892 7,021,892 7,021,892 RISK MANAGEMENT 1,075,272 892,500 892,500 893,000 910,860 929,077 TRANSFERS TO GENERAL FUND 78,173 39,000 39,000 39,000 39,780 40,576 IOTHER CHARGES AND SERVICES (407,055) (124,556) (124,556) (51,610) (52,642) (53,700) TOTAL EXPENDITURES $40,979,357 $44,968,576 $44,968,576 $46,228,558 $47,176,197 $48,172,822 IOTHER USES CAPITAL OUTLAY $2,683,374 $2,145,000 $2,195,000 $2,210,000 $2,075,000 $2,075,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET 17,225,605 16,462,250 17,292,275 17,892,075 19,741,300 9,525,000 DEBT SERVICES 2,714,181 2,750,000 2,750,000 2,750,000 3,300,000 3,300,000 T 0 T A L OTHER USES $22,623,160 $21,357,250 $22,237,275 $22,852,075 $25,116,300 $14,900,000 ITOTAL USES $63,602,517 $66.325,826 $67.205 851 $69,080,633 $72.292.497 $63.072.822 EXCESS REVENUE AND OTHER SOURCES OVER(UNDER)USES ($6,116,229) ($9,419,976) ($10,300,001) ($11,430,381) ($6,806,106) $289,574 OPERATING CASH BALANCES BEGINNING JULY 1 $37,877,759 $31,761,530 $31,761,530 $21,461,529 $10,031,148 $3,225,042 ENDING JUNE 30 $31,761,530 $22,341,554 $21,461,529 $10,031,148 $3,225,042 $3,514,616 Cash Reserve Ratio 78% 50% 48% 22% 7% 7% Cash reserve goal above 10% I52 WATER UTILITY CASH FLOW ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR 11 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 WATER SALES 52,121,963 52,559,850 53,059,850 55,713,441 59,056,247 61,418,497 63,261,052 OTHER INCOME 1,780,698 2,591,000 2,585,402 2,617,950 2,651,149 2,651,149 2,685,012 INTEREST INCOME 434,780 300,000 250,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 OPERATING INCOME _ 54,337,441 55,450,850 55,895,252 58,531,391 61,907,396 64,269,646 66,146,064 METROPOLITAN WATER ACCESSMENT (7,021,892) (7,021,892) (7,021,892) (7,021,892) (7,021,892) (7,021,892) (7,021,892) METROPOLITAN WATER PURCHASES (8,380,696) (11,169,000) (11,549,000) (12,152,000) (12,758,000) (13,585,000) (14,224,000) OPERATING EXPENDITURES (25,576,769) (26,777,684) (27,657,666) (28,002,305) (28,392,930) (28,642,264) (28,898,674) NET INCOME EXCLUDING DEP. 13,358,084 10,482,274 9,666,694 11,355,194 13,734,574 15,020,490 16,001,498 OTHER RECEIPTS/BOND PROCEEDS 0 5,500,000 15,000,000 IMPACT FEES 1,455,399 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS 1,693,448 955,000 1,255,000 955,000 955,000 955,000 955,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY (1,683,374) (2,195,000) (2,210,000) (2,075,000) (2,075,000) (2,185,000) (2,110,000) WATERSHED PURCHASES (1,000,000) (722,000) (1,500,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) DEBT SERVICE (2,714,181) (2,750,000) (2,750,000) (2,750,000) (2,750,000) (2,750,000) (2,750,000) DEBT SERVICE(NEW) 0 0 0 (550,000) (550,000) (2,050,000) (2,050,000) OTHER INCOME&EXPENSE _ (2,248,708) (4,212,000) (4,705,000) 580,000 (4,920,000) 8,470,000 (6,455,000) AVAILABLE FOR CAPITAL 11,109,376 6,270,274 4,961,694 11,935,194 8,814,574 23,490,490 9,546,498 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS (17,225,605) (16,570,275) (16,392,075) (18,741,300) (8,525,000) (22,221,160) (10,280,000) CASH INCREASE/(DECREASE) (6,116,229) (10,300,001) (11,430,381) (6,806,106) 289,574 1,269,330 (733,502) BEGINING CASH BALANCE 37,877,759 31,761,530 21,461,529 10,031,148 3,225,042 3,514,616 4,783,947 CASH INCREASE/(DECREASE) (6,116,229) (10,300,001) (11,430,381) (6,806,106) 289,574 1,269,330 (733,502) ENDING BALANCES 31,761,530 21,461,529 10,031,148 3,225,042 3,514,616 4,783,947 4,050,445 WATER DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE 4.92 3.81 3.52 3.44 4.16 3.13 r 3.33 RATE CHANGE 0.00% 5.00% 0.00% 6.00% 6.00% 4.00% 3.00% ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL WATER BILL(19974180.00) 353 371 371 393 ~_ 416 _ 433 446 Cash Reserve Ratio 78% 48% 22% 7%_ 7% 10% 8% Metropolitan water rate 213 219 226 233 240 _ 247 _ 254 Metropolitan water purchases in acre feet 48,000 51,000 52,000 _ 53,000 54,000 55,000 56,000 Water Supplied in Million Gallons 29,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Revenue per million gallons 1,797 1,752 1,769 1,857 1,969 2,047 2,109 I vti CO In 11111Q111. au sr um um ow us LI an emu r an - r um am r I Department of Public Utilities WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY 2011-12 COST PROJECT FISCAL YR ..t, CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION 2011-12 CITY,COUNTY,STATE AND MISC.DRIVEN PROJECTS 01301 500 EAST-1300 SOUTH TO BLAINE AVENUE(1735 S) ( 100 000 01301 VARIOUS PROJECTS 200 000 01301 _500/700 SOUTH REHAB-SURPLUS CANAL TO GLADIOLA STREET 3400 W) 800,000 1,100,000 )HATER MAIN MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS _ III 01301 513800024 NEW MAINLINE VALVES-COUNTY 138,000 01301 51400023 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS 100,000 01301 51400023 DONATED LINES 100,000 01301 513800025 NEW MAINLINE VALVES-CITY 262,000 01301 513700024 FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENTS 400,000 1 01301 514504 REGULATOR REPLACEMENT 300,000 01301 CONTRIBUTIONS BY DEVELOPERS 500,000 01301 513800030 VALVE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM PERFORMED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTOR 1,000,000 2,800,000 1 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS TOTALS 01301 513301962 G11-3 2930 EAST/2955 EAST-FORT UNION BOULEVARD(7000 S)TO 7230 SOUTH 191,250 01301 513301963 G11-3 JONATHON DRIVE(7310 S)-PIPPIN DRIVE(3570 E)TO THE END OF WINESAP CIRCLE 120,750 01301 513301898 G11-3 MACINTOSH LANE(7335 S)-WINESAP ROAD(7330 S)TO RACQUET CLUB DRIVE(3685 E) 218,750 01301 513301967 G11-3 NUTMEG STREET(7145 S)-NUTREE DRIVE(3325 E)TO PINE CONE STREET(3250 E) 55,625 01301 513301965 G11-3 SUNDRIFT CIRCLE(7230 S)-2890 EAST TO END OF THE CIRCLE 100,000 01301 513301986 G11-3 3050 EAST-FORT UNION BOULEVARD(7000 S)TO 7070 SOUTH 47,500 01301 CITY CREEK WATER LINE TO MORRIS RESERVOIR 100,000 I 01301 513301988 G12-1 3100 EAST-UPLAND DRIVE(3760 S)TO DEL MAR DRIVE(3825 S) 71,875 01301 513301971 G12-1 EVERGREEN AVENUE(3435 S)-3170 EAST TO 2890 EAST 218,750 01301 513301972 G12-1 3175 EAST-3300 SOUTH TO EVERGREEN AVENUE(3435 S) 256,250 01301 513301973 G12-1 CELESTE WAY(3370 S)-3175 EAST TO EVERGREEN AVENUE(3435 S) 127,500 01301 G12-1 DEL VERDE AVENUE(3410 S)-TERRACE VIEW DRIVE TO 3175 EAST 59,375 01301 612-1 3170 EAST-EVERGREEN AVENUE(3435 S)TO MILLCREEK CANYON ROAD(3500 S) 104,375 01301 G12-1 3125 EAST-EVERGREEN AVENUE(3435 S)TO END OF THE STREET 67,500 01301 G12-2 APOLLO DRIVE(4135 S)/4100 SOUTH-WASATCH BOULEVARD(3565 E)TO JUPITER DRIVE(3735 E) 172,500 01301, G12-2 ACHILLES DRIVE(3565 E)-APOLLO DRIVE(4135 S)TO HERMES DRIVE(4175 S) 93,750 01301 G12-2 DIANA WAY(3535 E)-APOLLO DRIVE(4135 S)TO HERMES DRIVE(4175 S) 101,250 C) 01301 G12-2 MARS WAY(3610 E)-APOLLO DRIVE(4135 S)TO HERMES DRIVE(4175 S) 76,250 01301 513301979 G12-3 3075 EAST-3900 SOUTH TO 3960 SOUTH 62,500 01301 G72-3 3960 SOUTH-3030 EAST T 3075 EAST 40,000 01301 G12-3 3030 EAST-3960 SOUTH TO THE END OF THE STREET 26,250 01301 G12-3 LISA DRIVE(3215 E)-DELSA DRIVE(3990 S)TO OLYMPIC WAY(3250 E) 120,000 111 01301 G12-3 OLYMPIC WAY (3250 E)-SPLENDER WAY(3315 E)TO HAMPTON COURT(4060 S) 76,250 01301 G12-4 WANDA WAY(4475 S)-PEACH STREET(2810 E)TO THE END OF THE STREET 190,000 01301 G12 4 APPLE BLOSSOM LANE(4600 S)-2760 EAST TO PEACH STREET)2810 E 120,000 01301 513505044 G12-5 DEARBORN STREET(1460 E)-PARKWAY AVENUE(2455 S)TO STRATFORD AVENUE(2560 S) 127,500 01301 513505045 G12-5 BEVERLY STREET(1380 E)-STRATFORD AVENUE(2560 E)TO 2700 SOUTH 127,500 01301 513505046 G12-5 CHADWICK STREET(1420 E)-PARKWAY AVENUE(2455 S)TO STRATFORD AVENUE(2560 S) 126,250 01301 1150 WEST-NORTH TEMPLE TO SOUTH TEMPLE(TO ROCK MOUNTAIN POWER METER) 18"MAIN 200,000 01301 VARIOUS 199,575 I . - MASTER PLAN PROJECTS 01301 BIG COTTONWOOD TANNER FLOW-4800 SOUTH-450 EAST TO LIFT STATION APPROX.890 EAST 200,000 01301 513301529 300 EAST-3300 SOUTH TO 3900 SOUTH-PHASE I 1,100,000 01301 513416319 OLYMPUS COVE PUMP STATION;PIPLINE MASTER PLAN 3.9 130,000 5,029,075 iTOTAL DISTRIBUTION MAINS d�HYDRANTS 8 929 075 WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS-2730.09 02201 513900059 LARGE METER REPLACEMENTS 400,000 I 01701 513900060 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENTS 1,800,000 02401 513900061 SMALL METER PROGRAM 400.000 03301 513900062 NEW SERVICE CONNECTIONS 400,000 03201 513900063 WATER METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 100,000 III 3,100,000 LANDSCAPING-2730.20 00101 ARTESIAN BASIN AREA ASPHALT 59,000 00901 BACKWASH TANK ROAD 50,000 01701 ASPHALT SHOPS YARD 190,000 01701 ASPHALT EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT 75,000 54 Department of Public Utilities WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY 2011-12 COST PROJECT FISCAL YR I CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION 2011-12 374.000 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 17,892,075 if 2750.10 AUTOMOBILES&TRUCKS 00101 3/4 TON PICKUP 4X4 62,000 I 00601 CANYON PU 4X4 EXT CAB 25,000 00601, CANYON PU 4X4 EXT CAB 25,000 00801 CANYON PU 4X4 EXT CAB 23,000 00801 1/2 TON PU 4X4 25,000 01301 CANYON PU 4X4 EXT CAB 45,000 I 01401 1 TON C&C 4X4 EXT CAB 105,000 01701 21/2 TON V&H TRUCK W/SERVICE BODY 350,000 01701 10 WHEEL DUMP TRUCK 300,000 02201 1 TON C&C 4X4 EXT CAB 35,000 1 02601 CANYON PU _ 25,000 02801 CANYON PU 25,000 1,045,000 2750.30 FIELD MAINT EQUIPMENT-MOTIVE 00601 ATVWITH TRAILER 8,000 01701 BACKHOE EXCHANGE PROGRAM 90,000 01701 BACKHOE 4X4 85,000 01701 TRANSPORT TRAILER - 35,000 i 218,000 2760.10 PUMP PLANT EQUIPMENT-WIP 2774.1.0 02501 TANNER RESERVOIR PRV-ADD ADDITIONAL PRV TO EXISTING STATION 80,000 02501 MT.OLY MOTOR CONTROL 80,000 i 02501 UPPER ELLISON(AIR COOLING UNIT) 8,000 168,000 2760.20 TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT-WIP 2774.10 00901 ON LINE TURBIDIMETERS 8,000 8.000 2760.30 TELEMETRY EQUIPMENT 00101 IRRIGATION SCADA SYSTEM-PHASE II 50,000 01501 SCADA SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 250,000 I 300,000 2760.50 OFFICE FURNITURE&EQUIPMENT 01301 COPIER 10,000 03201 SHAREPOINT SOFTWARE AND IMPLEMENTATION 30,000 03201 CITY WORKS REMOTE SOFTWARE 25,000 03201 SOFTWARE UPGRADE 30,000 03201 BILLING SYSTEM UPGRADE 100,000 i 195,000 3760.90 OTHER NON-MOTIVE EQUIPMENT 00101 SECURTY CAMERA AND GATE FOR ARTESIAN BASIN PROPERTY 25,000 I 00101 DR MOWER 5,000 00601 CITY CREEK GATE AND CAMERA SYSTEM 50,000 00601 CITY CREEK SIGNS 25,000 01501 NEW RADIOS 20,000 01601, LARGE FORMAT SCANNER 20.000 I 01701 EMERGENCY PIPING 50,000 01701 HYDRAULIC PLATE COMPACTOR FOR BACKHOE(2) 12,000 02201 CEMENT MIXER SKID MOUNT 9,000 02601 HANDHELD METER READING DEVICES 20,000 03201 GPS VEHICLE MANAGEMENT/TRACKING SYSTEM 40,000 1 I I 276 000 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,210,000 TOTAL CAPITAL 20,102,075 55 I WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIX YEAR BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011.12 BUDGET COST PROJECT GROWTH PRIORITY FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR PROJECTS CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1L RATING PIPE 2010.11 2011.12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-IS 2015-16 _DELAYED 51-03301- 2710.10.LAND _ 03301I WATERSHED PROPERTY 1 1,000,000 1,500.000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 _ 1,000,000 1.000.000 1.100.000 1 000.000 1 000 000 1.000900 1.000 0 51-03301-1 WATER RIGHTS&SUPPLY . - 03301 WATER STOCK PURCHASES 30,000 30.000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 39.000 30.000 39-000 30.000 30-9QE -30add1 0 51-01301- MAINTENANCE&REPAIR SHOPS-2720.19 00101' ARTESIAN BASIN HOUSE DEMOLITION 1 30,000 00601 SILVER LAKE DISPLAY UPGRADE TO FACILITY AND COST SHARING 1 10,000 00601 VARIOUS RESTROOM REPLACEMENTS 40,000 (10601 _ 5122.616 ROTARY PARK PAVILION-AREA 30 AND ROOF 0 25,000 00601 CITY CREEK GUARD HOUSE DEMO/NEW STORAGE SHED I NEW ASPHALT 1 120,000 02201 AUTO SHUT-OFF GAS VALVES-SHOPS COMPLEX _ 2 15,000 02201 DEMO A RESTORATION OF THE WASATCH ELECTRIC PROPERTY 2 274,000 02201 SHOPS BUILDING OPTIONS(HVAC) 1 40000 10,000,000 02201 'SHOPS ROOF REPLACEMENT 2 200,000 _ 03201; ADMINISTRATION OFFICE(HVAC) 2 250,000 03201' NEW POWER SERVICE LINE TO ADMINISTRATION BUIWING 1 50,000 03201 ADMINISTRATIION OFFICE REMODEL 1 200,000 03201i ADMINISTRATION OFFICE(BATHROOM REHAB 2 PER YEAR) ,'}Q.1�)' -)�.of, ,325500 469 0 40 000 U 10,000 000 51-01301-1 2772.10 TREATMENT PLANTS-2720.30 -- - CITY CREEK 00701 514100112 CITY CREEK-FLOCCULATION BASIN INSTRUMENTPANEL ISOLATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 0 25,000 00701 CITY CREEK-CLARIFIER OVERFLOW PIPING MODIFICATIONS(REMOVAL)AND REPLACEMENT 1 00701 514100114:CITY CREEK-POWER AND TELEMETRY TO THE DRYING BEDS INCLUDING GATE AND CONTROL DEVICES 1 8,000 _ 007011 514100103 CITY CREEK-SECURITY CAMERA PROJECT 1 00701 F 514100105 CITY CREEK-INTAKE STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS 1 00701 512289 CITY CREEK-COAGULATION BASIN 2 00701' SEDIMENTATION BASIN ROOF REPAIR 3 10,000 _ 5,000,000 00701 5122615 DRAINAGE AND SLUDGE LINE SEPARATION AND REHAB 1 4000'00 00701 CITY CREEK BIKE TRAIL FROM GUARD STATION TO PLANT(4 MILES-12 FEET WIDE) BOND 2014 0 _ 300,000 00701 I SED BASINS-SEISMIC-COLLECTORS BOND 2014 2 - - 8,000,000 __ 00701' W SYSTEM 0 _ 00701 REPLACE ALL OW LARGE LINES 2 00701 512289 I CITY CREEK-COAG AND FILTER BUIWING ROOF REPAIRS-MEMBRANE • 0 125,000 00701 DRYING BED STUDY AND POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 2 1,000,000 00701 514100116 REPLACE STAIRS AND LADDERS IN COAG/FILTER BOND 2014 1 18,000 1,000,000 00701 REPLACE UPPER RECLAIM BRIDGE AND GATE 1 50,000 00701 'ENLARGE CLARIFIER 0 _ 750,000 00701 'ENLARGE OR REPLACE BACK WASH TANK BOND 2014 0 - 500,000 00701 'REPLACE LEAKS ON FILTER WALLS 2 30,000 00701 REPLACE CONCRETE BRIDGES TO CLARIFIER AND SLUDGE BEDS 2 120,000 00701 REPLACE PVC CHEMICAL LINES ON FLOURIDE AND HYPOCHLORITE 1 50,000 00701 514100118 REPLACE FILTER BUILDING WINDOWS 3 35,000 _ 00701 SECURITY FENCE FOR SLUDGE BEDS/BACKWASH TANK 3 75,000 00701 SECURITY FENCING FOR BACK OF PLANT 3 40,000 00701 FILTER GALLERY/LOWER POLY ROOM/SHOP FLOORING REPAIRS 3 80,000 _ 00701 LEVEL SENSORS AT SLUDGE BEDS 1 12,000 00701 UGHTING AT SLUDGE BEDS 2 12,000 00701 MOVE HYDRANT 2 15,000 _ 00701 ELECTRIC ACTUATOR FOR CLARIFIER EFFLUENT VALVE 2 15,000 00701 514100102 OVERHEAD DOOR AT FLOURIDE BUILDING 0 25,000 00701 REPLACE SLUDGE COLLECTOR MOTOR BASE MOUNTS 1 7,000 A PARLEY'S 00801 PARLEY'S TP-REFURBISH ALL FILTER VALVES 0 100,000 00801 DAM SLEEVE VALVE BOND 2014 1 1,000,000 2,000,003 00601 PARLEY'S HYDROPOWERPROJECT BOND 2014 0 1,000,000 00801 SLUDGE BEDS-UNING&VALVES 2 900,000 00801 PRECURSOR/TASTE B.ODOR CONTROL 2 1,000,000 00801, PARLEY'S TP-LABORATORY UPGRADE 2 50,000 00801' PARLEY'S TP-BOAT HOUSE NEW RAMP OR REPLACEMENT OF BOAT LAUNCH SYSTEM WITH WINCH. 2 15 000 00801 'PARLEY'S TP-CONDUIT FROM DAM TO OLD ICB TO PLANT. 2 20,000 00801 'PARLEY'S TP-INSTALL CARBON FEED SYSTEM 0 50,000 00801- PARLEY'S TP-REPLACE ALL POST STORAGE TANK HYPO PLUMBING _ 1 _ _ _ 10,000 00801, PARLEY'S TP-REPLACE STAIRS ON MT.DELL DAM ) - 2 20,000 008011 PARLEY'S TP-NEW I/O AND PLC FOR NEW INSTRUMENTS 5 FLUORIDE,INCLUDING F2 AND HE SENSORS AND ALARM 1 50,000 00801' REPLACE VFD'S 1 160,000 (71 00801 'PARLEY'S TP-FLOCCULATION BASIN MIXING PADDLE REPLACEMENT AND BAFFUNG MODIFICATIONS 2 25,000 A W 00801' 'REFURBISH ALL FILTER WASTE GATES 0 25,000 400,000 00801 'REPLACE VALVES ON MT.DELL DAM 1 500,000 00801 ROOF MOUNT UNIT HEATERS IN COAG BASIN 2 50,000 00801 I REPLACE FRONT GATE 2 20,000 00801' 'SLUDGE BED STUDY 2 100,000 00801 !WOMAN'S RESTROOM ADA UPGRADE 3 25,000 I BIG COTTONWOOD 00901 514100115 BIG COTTONWOOD-PLC.I/O AND DATA HIGHWAY CONVERSION TO ETHERNET AND PLC REPLACEMENT. 1 100,000 , . .. WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIX YEAR BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011.12 BUDGET COST PROJECT .. I CFISCAL CR FISCAL OF FOCAL HF FROJEOTS 3 • . 0090 BIG COTTONWOOD-REFURBISH FILTER VALVES POSSIBLE EXCEPTION OF FILTER EFFLUENT VALVEM 0090 BIG COTTONWOOD RELOCATE FLIER GALLERY VO PANELS FROM BAD ENVIRONMENT 3 50.000 0090 BIG COTTONWOOD-HYPOCHLOPITE GENERATION 50,000 COM 51410010 REFURBISH WASTE GATES MRCP 0000 REPUCE CHAIN DRIBS ON FLOCCUUTORS ONO ----R-OLDE MOUNT HEATING SYSTEM-FILTER BUILDING 25,000 i REFURBISH OR REPLACE ALL FILTER VALVES - 1 ob COO 12.900,000 ',REPLACE CONCRETE IN BYPASS CHANNEL 20,000 XIS REPLACE FLOCCULATOR VFO DRIVES 15.000 0000 'REPLACE FACILITY UPPER END PLC 20.000:_ 0000 .REPLACE LEVEL SENSORS IN STORA-73rIANKS 10000 0000 REPLACE PUMPS ON CLEAR WELL UNDING 40.000 COM REPUCE OR REF LABLSH FLASH MIXEMS 0000 REPLACE FLOOR IN 90 ET IFATR1OAQW . 100.000 M. LIME GATE 0000 (100) INTAKE STRUCTURE 30.000 200 010 0. MCC FOR VMS FOR THE PUMPS AT RECYCLE BASIN WITH SURGE PROTECTORS MACS 0000 PAVE LOWER DRIVE TO CLARIFIER AND WIDEN DRIVE 10,000 .0 TREA.ENT PLANT STUDY TO REVIEW FACILITIES 100.000 537.11110 523.0123 SCUM 50 600 00 ill: 1 11111 01311-111t---UGRAOtr00R iL00 iLPLOING .2100,01 2 50050 WOW 5000 50040 KM 50.0 01301 513410205 LITTLE WILLOW PUMP STATION EXPANSION 15554 1 100.0 01301 uV UPGRADE 6200 SOUTH PUMP STATION i 300,000 01301 51341623 7600 SOUTH UPGRADE 500.000 01301 MT OLYMPUS PUMP STATION-FULL BACKUP POWER 500.003 01301 MILITARY PUMP STATION-FULL BACKUP POWER TIOND 2014 R :.04 01301 AUXILIARY POWER-EAST BENCH PRESSURE 20HE SONOMA 3 01301 OAAHL_LLS PUMP STATION-MOTOR CONTROL CERTENRCITUMP UPORP. BOND to. 3 50300 01301 FONTAINE BLEU VED 01301 CEITH ANO IITH BOOSTER•VFO • 3 01'00 51301 UPPER BOUNDARY REPLACE SPRING BOX BOZO 3012 2 020 X00 01301 PUMP STATION&WEIL EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS STUDY 1 WOO CO. 01301 NORTH BENCH PUMP STATION BOND 2012 3 1.006.008 01301 EAST BENCH AUXILIARY POWER 2 -- 135.000 241 1 2600 SOUTH AUXILLIARY POWER 4500 SOUTH AUXILUARY POWER 5011151014 2 2 207.000 214)00 MEE WINO mast ...me ',AI MIS 4 '''' 40TH SOTUILFIL.I.ORDS0.41. CANAL 50,000 I 00101 JORDAN SALT LINE DAMP AT IWO!MTH 200 000 • 00101 5129223 VARIOUS LOCATIONS 50,000 50,000 _ 50.0 50.3 50,000 MAO 00101 511930001 ROCK HOUSE EMBANKMENT 75,000 00101 512446,5 WILMINGTON DIVERSION 00101 MEASURING DEVICES FOR JSL AND El CANM S 10,000 00101' LITTLE COTTONY/00D PARSHAL FLUME 20,000 120.000 00101 2100 SOUTH TO 1700 SOUTH 100000 100.000 MOO • 00101' CANAL ASSET MANAGEMENT ANL,CONDITION STUDY 100.500 50101 6200 SOUTH PUMPSTATION RELOCATON , 00101 Pm SouTH-.3T JORDAN TO AL CANAL INTERCOMBECT 120.000 00101 IRINGANON PIPE LINE PROJECTS ALONG EAST JORDAN CANN.-FROM FORT UNION BOULEVARD TO DM 000 000 355.000 MI. 150 000 50 000 MRSR SLIM 4 • -- -- - 11-01301- 2729 19 DEEP P1B5P-0111a-2710. 01301 _51323390 UPGRADE BUILDING STRUCTURES OIL. 13. 100100 100.000 _ 100 000 100.000 100 000, I 00,.0 01301 51322335 PCE TREATMENT ARGUE I 1500 EAST WELL GRANT 5.000.000 01301 STUDY TREATMENT Of PCE AT WELLS 2.00.00 01301 13TH AND 27114 SOUTH WELL.STATION(POMADE(IN PROGRESS) 10000 01301 5132251 RED BUTTE 10051 2,000.0 01301 51322336 0200 SOUTH UPGRADE 250 MO 01301 --- ARIE BLEU-RERAB 350 000 01301 NEFFS CRAW-1/F13 25.. 01301 51322334.WELL...VFD 35.000 0 01 10 3403 1 0UGA200015E PARA WELL-V513 19TH AND RN SOLTININELL-VFD SOON 01301 5200 SOUTH WELL-VED 51301 EDGEWOOD BARS..RE.B 200.000 r133.0”1 MILLCREEN WELL-ON VFD BRIT SPRINGS-REHAB I— 309002 200 COO 0 r01 1 WELL 5-REHAB ARTESLAN VVELL 1-REHAB 250.690 299 0,30 UI 01301 ARTESULN WELL 2 REHAB 250,0120 -.1 _112000 saLmo Ulalair Mei— °Ler "IS 15210 OM 10.0.1251U.. _27212211211111180121111.1721171 . 01301 LITTLE DEL DAM ACCESS ROAD REH4-11.11ffBNON • 1 01 000 01301 AIR VENI.T1ON SYSTEM REPAIRS AT LURIE DEU.C. MEMO 1 10,000 _ 01301 LITTLE DELL DAM INSTURMENTATION UPGRADE METRO 1 IMMO 01301 BOAT RAMP REPAIRS AT LITTLE DELL.M METRO 1 40.000 0)00 100037 MT DELL CONCRETE STUDY 5 RESUFACE 1 50 000 50 000 1111 1111 1110 11111 1110 111 1110 ill NI 1111 SS We NM IMO MI SM. IIIIII t 1 II - - pin 1r WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIX YEAR BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 BUDGET COST PROJECT GROWTH ppjpITY FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCALYR FISCAL YR PROJECTS CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION .,.:. % RATMIA PIPE 2010.11 2011.12 2012-13 2013-14 2014.15 111545 DELAYED 01301 51344326 LITTLE DELL PORTAL REPAIRS 4 01301 5134455 RED PINE DAM REHAB CORE WALL 0% 2 _ 90,000 01301 RESURFACE DAM FACE-LAKE MARY 0% 2 _ 50,000 2,000,000 01301 INSTALL A DIRECT PIPE INTO PARLEYS TREATMENT FROM LITTLE DELL 0% 4 2,000,000 01301 DRAIN SYSTEM ACID FLUSH AT TWIN LAKES DAM 4 25.000 01301 •CECRET LAKE DAM REHAB. 1 30.000 100,000 01301 LAKE MARY REHAB _ 0% 3 I,�,,� 250J100 105 000 90 000 0 50.000 0 51-01301- 2773.10[DISTRIBUTION RESERVOIRS-M0.07 _- _ 01301 51344122 1300 EAST RESERVOIR DEMOLITION 0% 1 15,000 _ 01301 UPPER BOUNDARY TANK REPAINTING 0% 1 200,000 - 01301 MISCELLANEOUS REPAIRS 0% 1 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 01301 51344325 GRANITE OAKS RESERVIOR 100% 4 01301 51344461 EASTWOOD TANK PAINTING 0% 1 16,000 01301 513444159'MILITARY RESERVOIR REPLACEMENT 0% 1 15,000 200,000 11,000,000 01301 51344463;MILLCREEK(LOWER BOUNDARY)TANK 0% 1 45,000 01301 RESERVOIR INSPECTION OF TEN SITES(CORROSION CONTROL CONTRACT) 0% 1 50,000 _ 01301 TANK PAINTING AND CORROSION CONTROL - -- ' 500,000 500,000 01301 '7600 SOUTH PRESSURE ZONE-4.3 MILLION GALLON RESERVOIR 100% 4 341.000 300000 -50,000 50.000 550.003 500.000 11.000 006 51-01301- 27731Q1DSTRIBUTION MAINS 8 HYDRANTS-2730.01 i CITY.COUNTY.STATE AND MSC.DRIVEN PROJECT$ 01301 1VARIOUS PROJECTS 0% 1 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 01301, 1900 SOUTH-700 EAST TO 1100 EAST 0% 1 - 3,200 013011 700 SOUTH-4400 WEST TO 5600 WEST 0%' 1 9,600 100,000 01301, CALIFORNIA AVENUE(1330 S)-4800 WEST TO 5600 WEST 0% 1 6,400 1,000,000 01301' 1300 EAST-SOUTH TEMPLE TO 500 SOUTH 0% 1 4,000 _. _ __ 100,000 01301 GLADIOLA STREET(3400 WI-500 SOUTH TO CAUFORNIA AVENUE(1330 S) 25% 1 6,640 - _ 200,000 01301 51350Q56 500 EAST-1300 SOUTH TO BLAINE AVENUE(1735 S) 0% 1 _ 100,000 01301' 513505076 1500[700 SOUTH REHAB-SURPLUS CANAL TO GLADIOLA STREET(3400 W) 0% 1 800.000 01301 I NORTH TEMPLE REDWOOD ROAD TO RIVER 0% 1 20Q 000 500�00 1 100 000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.g& 1,300000 WATER MAIN MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS 01301 513800024 NEW MAINLINE VALVES-COUNTY 0% 1 266,000 138000 138,000 138,000 138,000 138,000 01301' 51400023 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS 0% 1 100,000 100 000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 01301 51400023 DONATED UNES 0% 1 100,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 01301 i 513800025•NEW MAINUNE VALVES-CITY 0% 1 262,000 262,000 262,000 262,000 262,000 262,000 01301' 513700024'FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENTS 0% 1 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 01301'. 514504.REGULATOR REPLACEMENT 0% 1 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 013011 'CONTRIBUTIONS BY DEVELOPERS 0% 1 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 01301, 513800030'VALVE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM PERFORMED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTOR 0% 1 ffiQ.-00 1 00Q9 Y.,:3.�.� 0 1.500,000 1A110900 1600000 1.500900 6 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS 013011 513504860 010-1 OAKHILLS WAY(2745 E)-CRESTVIEW DRIVE(1010 S)TO ST MARY'S WAY(1200 S) -DESIGNED 0% 1,772 23,000 01301 513504708 G10-2 17TH AVENUE(650 N)-HILLTOP ROAD(645 E)TO LITTLE VALLEY ROAD(860 E) 0% 2,190 85,000 01301' 513504961 G10-3 DESOTO STREET(45 E)-ZANE AVENUE(530 N)NORTH TO THE END 0% 1,385 95,000 01301. 513301959,LITTLE WILLOW PIPE UPGRADE 0% 1,500 01301 513501847''G4-6 500 WEST-450 NORTH TO 500 NORTH 0% 460 176,000 01301 513301880;G11-1 SANTA ROSA AVENUE(3325 S)-SANTA ROSA DRIVE(3275 E)TO EL SERRITO DRIVE(3425 E) 0% 980 122,500 01301 513301880•G11-1 LOS ALTOS STREET(3370 E)-SANTA ROSA AVENUE(3325 S)TO DEL VERDE AVENUE(3410 S) 0% 740 92,500 01301 513301680 1 G11-1 PLAZA WAY(3320 E)-SANTA ROSA AVENUE(3325 S)TO APPROX.3378 SOUTH(8"VAL) 0% 480 80,000 01301 513301920'G11-1 MONZA DRIVE(3680 S)-WASATCH BOULEVARD(3585 E)TO MILLCREST ROAD(3500 E) 0% 510 175,750 01301 513301956'G11-2 CUMMINGS ROAD(3450 S)-EL SERRITO CANE(3425 E)TO VIRGINIA STREET(3470 E) 0% 495 88,875 01301 513301956 G11-2 VIRGINIA STREET(3470 E)-CUMMINGS ROAD(3450 S)TO MILLCREEK CANYON ROAD(3500 S) 0% 690 86,250 01301 513301961 G11-2 LAURELCREST STREET(3185 E)-CRAIG DRIVE(3640 S)TO UPLAND DRIVE(3760 S) 0% 1,100 137,500 01301 513301904 G11-2 4135 SOUTH/SHANNA STREET-2700 EAST TO 4140 SOUTH 0% 1,200 150,000 01301 513301905 G11-2 OLYMPUS DRIVE(4155 S)-CORAL STREET(2600 E)TO 2700 EAST 0% 660 82,500 01301' 513301974 G11-4 CHARLESTON LANE(5880 S)-STANIDA CIRCLE(1635 E)TO HIGHLAND DRIVE(1970 E) 0% 1450 181,250 01301 513301975 GI1♦COBBLEROCK LANE(2520 E)-6200 SOUTH TO THE END OF THE STREET 0% 1100 137,500 - 01301' 513301976 G11-4 BEAUMONT DRIVE(1840 E)-CONWAY ROAD(1740 E)TO THE END OF BEAUMONT CIRCLE(5750 S) 0% 1650 284,250 01301 513504962 G10-3 COLUMBUS STREET(1 E)-GIRARD AVENUE(540 N)NORTH TO THE END 0% 1,750 210,000 01301 513301901 G10-4 CUMORAH DRIVE(4420 S)-ABINADI ROAD(4160 E)TO HELAMAN CIRCLE(4430 S) 0% 580 69,800 01301 513301902 G10-4 GILEAD WAY(4460 S)-ZARAHEMLA DRNE(4215 E)TO END OF STREET 0% 1,420 236,400 01301 513301903 ZARAHELMA DRIVE FORM ABOUT 4497 SOUTHTO GILEAD WAY 0% 64,000 01301 513301907 APOLLA DRIVE&ACHILLES DRIVE,DIANA WAY TO MILLCREST 0% 5,400 01301 513301995 MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE 0% 95,000 01301 513301998 PEARCE 0% 3,000 01301 513505059'AIRPORT LIGHT RAIL 0% 27,000 01301, 513505055 300 NORTH INTERSECTION 0% 16,000 013011 503505062 IOLA 0% 59,000 01301 513505070 500 SOUTH TO 700 SOUTH FROM SURPLUS TO GLADIOLA 0% 650,000 01301. 513505057 700 NORTH 0% 26,000 Ut 01301 513505067 FREMONT AVENUE(1100 S)-RICHARDS STREET(40 W)NORTH TO FREMONT STREET 0% 41,000 CO 01301 FOOTHILL AND 17TH SOUTH 30-INCH VALVE 0% 75,000 01301 513301996'3900 SOUTH PIPUNE REPLACEMENT 2,500 320,000 01301 513301993 1 G11-4 CELECIA CIRCLE(5750 S)-HIGHLAND DRIVE(1970 E)TO END OF CECELUL CIRCLE(5750 S) 0% 1100 221,500 01301 513301999,6400 SOUTH-2300 EAST TO THE END OF THE CIRCLE(APPROX.2196 E) 90,000 01301 513302000 6525 SOUTH-2300 EAST TO THE END OF THE CIRCLE(APPROX.2156 E) 160,000 TOTALS 16,405 01301. 513301962:G11-3 2930 EAST/2955 EAST-FORT UNION BOULEVARD(7000 S)TO 7230 SOUTH 0% 1 1,530 191.250 01301 513301953 0113 JONATHON DRIVE(7310 S)-PIPPIN DRIVE(3570 E)TO THE ENO OF WINESAP CIRCLE 0% 1 966 120,750 01301 I 513301896 1011-3 MACINTOSH LANE(7335 Sl-WINESAP ROAD(7330 SI TO RACQUET CLUB DRIVE(3665 El 0% 1 1,750 216.750 WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIX YEAR BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 BUDGET COST PROJECT GROWTH PRIORITY FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR PROJECTS CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION % RATING PIPE 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2413-14 2014-15 266E16 DELAYED 01301 513301967 G11-3 NUTMEG STREET(7145 S)-NUTREE DRIVE(3325 E)TO PINE CONE STREET(3250 E) 0% 445 _ 55,625 _ _ 01301 513301965 G 11-3 SUNDRIFT CIRCLE(7230 S)-2890 EAST TO END OF THE CIRCLE _ 0% 800 100,000 I 01301 513301966 G 11-3 3050 EAST-FORT UNION BOULEVARD(7000 S)TO 7070 SOUTH - 0% 360 47,500 01301 CITY CREEK WATER UNE TO MORRIS RESERVOIR 0% 10,000 100,000 01307 513301968 G12-1 3100 EAST-UPLAND DRIVE(3760 S)TO DEL MAR DRIVE(3925 S) 0% 575 71575 01301 513301971 G 12-1 EVERGREEN AVENUE(3435 S)-3170 EAST TO 2890 EAST 0% 1,750 218,750 01301 513301972 G 12-1 3175 EAST-3300 SOUTH TO EVERGREEN AVENUE(3435 S) 0% 2,050 255.250 01301 513301973 G 12-1 CELESTE WAY(3370 S)-3175 EAST TO EVERGREEN AVENUE(3435 S) 0% 1,020 _ 127,500 01301 513301986'G12-1 DEL VERDE AVENUE(3410 S)-TERRACE NEW DRIVE TO 3175 EAST 0% 475 _ 59.375 01301 513301987'G12-1 3170 EAST-EVERGREEN AVENUE(3435 S)TO MILLCREEK CANYON ROAD(3500 S) 0% 835 104,375 01301 5133019/36 G12-1 3125 EAST-EVERGREEN AVENUE(3435 S)TO END OF THE STREET 0% 540 67,500 01301 513301907 G12-2 APOLLO DRIVE(4135 Sy4100 SOUTH-WASATCH BOULEVARD(3565 E)TO JUPITER DRIVE(3735 E) 0% 1,380 172.500 01301 513301907 G12-2 ACHILLES DRIVE(3565 E)-APOLLO DRIVE(4135 S)TO HERMES DRIVE(4175 S) 0% 750 93,750 01301 513301907 G12-2 DIANA WAY(3535 E)-APOLLO DRIVE(4135 S)TO HERMES DRIVE(4175 S) 0% 810 101,250 01301' 513301907•G12-2 MARS WAY(3610 E)-APOLLO DRIVE(4135 S)TO HERMES DRIVE(4175 S) 0% 610 76,250 01301 513301979 012-3 3075 EAST-3900 SOUTH TO 3960 SOUTH 0% 500 3,000 62,500 01301 513301979'G12-3 3960 SOUTH-3030 EAST T 3075 EAST 0% 320 40.000 01301 513301979 G12-3 3030 EAST-3960 SOUTH TO THE END OF THE STREET 0% 210 26,250 01301 513301081 G12-3 LISA DRIVE(3215 E)-DELSA DRIVE(3990 S)TO OLYMPIC WAY(3250 E) 0% _ ( 960 _ 120,000 01301 513301982 G12-3 OLYMPIC WAY(3250 E)-SPLENDER WAY(3315 E)TO HAMPTON COURT(4060 S) -----_-- 0% 610 76250 01301' 513301983 G 12-4 WANDA WAY(4475 S)-PEACH STREET(2610 E)TO THE END OF THE STREET 0% 1,520 190,000 01301 513301985 G 12-4 APPLE BLOSSOM LANE 4600 S)-27130 EAST TO PEACH STREET 2910E 0% _ _ _ 960 _ 120,000 01301 513505044 G12-5 DEARBORN STREET(1480 E)-PARKWAY AVENUE(2455 S)TO STRATFORD AVENUE(2560 S) 0%' - 1,020• 127,500 01301 513505045 G12-S BEVERLY STREET(1380 E)-STRATFORD AVENUE(2560 E)TO 2700 SOUTH _ 0% 1,020 127,500 01301 513505046 G12-5 CHADWICK STREET(1420 E)-PARKWAY AVENUE(2455 S)TO STRATFORD AVENUE(2560 S) 0% 1,010 126250 01301 513505075 1150 WEST-NORTH TEMPLE TO SOUTH TEMPLE(TO ROCK MOUNTAIN POWER METER)18"MAIN 1,000 200,000 01301 !VARIOUS _ 0% 1,596 199.575 • 21,521 013011 'G13-1 2570 EAST-HERITAGE WAY(2760 S)TO BARBEY DRIVE(2800 S) - 0% 300 37,500 - - 01301' G13-1 APPROX.2572 EAST-BARBEY DRIVE TO HERITAGE WAY 0% 295 36,875 01301 G13-1 HERITAGE WAY(2760 S)-2520 EAST TO APPROX.2575 EAST 0% 345 40,625 01301 G13-1 2900 SOUTH-DEVEREAUX WAY(2550 E)TO 2700 EAST 0%_ 720 90,000 01301 G13-1 2880 SOUTH-2870 EAST TO APPROX.2730 EAST/SOUTH TO LOUISE AVENUE(2020 S) 0% - 1,250 156,250 01301 G13-1 296012965 SOUTH-2790 EAST TO GRACE STREET(3100 E) 0% 2,100 262,500 01301 G13-2 CREST OAK DRIVE(3680 E)-BROCKBANK DRIVE(4435 S)TO EAST CUFF DRIVE(4395 S) 0% 1,068 141,180 01301 G13-2 PIN OAK(3680 E)-OAKVIEW DRIVE(4275 S)TO SPRUCE DRIVE(4360 S) 0% 610 79,300 01301 G13-2 PARK HILL DRIVE(3585 E)-EASTOAKS DRIVE(4450 S)TO FORTUNA WAY(4725 8) 0% 380 49,400 01301 013-2 FORTUNA WAY(4725 S)-PARK HILL DRIVE(3565 E)TO BROCKBANK DRIVE(3560 E) 0% 1,210 157 00 01301 G13-1 200 EAST-400 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) 0% - MI5 __ 86,450 01301 613-3 MICHIGAN AVENUE(980 S)-1300 EAST TO 1500 EAST 0% 1,635 212,550 01301' G13-3 VIRGINIA STREET(1345 E)-CRESTUNE CIRCLE(350 N)TO FIFTH AVENUE(250 N) 0% 720 90,000 01301 G13-4 HIDDEN OAKS DRIVE(3370 E)-RUSSELL PARK DRIVE(8850 S)NORTH TO THE END OF THE STREE1 0% 1,280 _ 163,500 01301 G13-4 GRAND OAKS DRIVE(3465 E)-RUSSELL PARK ROAD(8879 S)TO RUSSELL PARK ROAD(8635 S) 0% 1285 167,050 01301 G13-4 SCANDIA WAY(8230 S)/NORDIC DRIVE(6200 S)-FINLANDIA WAY(3025 E)TO DANISH ROAD(31101 0% i, 133,250 01301 G13-4 SUPERNAL WAY(3615 E)-TOP OF THE WORLD DRIVE(3675 E)TO LORA LEE CIRCLE(8340 S) 0% 810 105,300 01301, G12-5 BARBEY DRIVE(2800 S)-2570 EAST TO 2700 EAST - - 0% 1,030 -- 126,750 - ---- - 01301 G12-5 WAINWRIGHT ROAD(2605 E)-BARBEY DRIVE(2800 S)TO 2900 SOUTH 0% 960 120,000 013011 G 12-5 DEVEREAUX WAY(2550 E)-WAINWRIGHT ROAD(2605 S)TO 2900 SOUTH 0% 790 98,750 - 01301 VARIOUS 0% 453 104,470 18,909 01301 G14-1 MORNINGSIDE DRIVE(4050 S)/3075 E-DELSA DRIVE(3990 S)TO PMETREE DRIVE(2960 E) 0% 900 117,000 01301 G14-1 ENCHANTED HILLS DRIVE(7510 S)-MAGIC HILLS DRIVE(3450 E),WEST TO END OF THE MAIN 0% 1,700 221,000 01301 G14-1 MOUNTAIN ESTATES DRIVE(3355 E)-BENGAL BOULEVARD(7500 S)TO 7835 SOUTH 0% 1,100 143,000 - 01301 G14-1 COUNTRY MANOR ROAD(7620 S)-3500 EAST TO COUNTRY HOLLOW DRIVE(7510 S) 0% 1 180 150,800 01301 G14-2 NEW STAR DRIVE(1785 W)-NORTH STAR DRIVE(300 N)SOUTH TO THE END OF THE STREET 0% 120,2.50 01301 G14-2 SOUTH TEMPLE(1 S)-1000 WEST TO THE JORDAN RIVER(APPROX.1120 W) 0% 1,/35 -- 225,550 -- - 01301 G14-2 BUCCANEER DRIVE(1160 W)-1000 NORTH TO 1103 NORTH 0% 680 89,700 01301 G14-2 DUPONT AVENUE(1335 N)-AMERICAN BEAUTY DRIVE(1030 IN)-990 WEST 0% 520 67,600 01301 G14-2 DULUTH AVENUE(1550 N)-900 WEST TO DEXTER STREET(840 W) 0% 355 46,150 01301 G14-2 900 WEST-DULUTH AVENUE(1550 N)TO 1500 NORTH 0% 285 38,350 01301 G143 400 SOUTH-EMERY STREET(1170 W)TO APPROX.1145 WEST(SOUTH SIDE MAIN) 0% 200 26,000 01301 G14-3 400 SOUTH-GOSHEN STREET(1040 W)TO APPROX.1130 WEST(NORTH SIDE MAIN) 0% 690 89,700 - 01301 G14-4 7590 SOUTH-3395 EAST TO 3500 EAST 0% 710 88,750 01301 G14-4 AVONDALE DRIVE(3700 E)-7650 SOUTH TO APPROX 3623 EAST(END OF EXTENSION) 0% 890 115,700 01301 G14-4 BISCAYNE DRIVE(2975 E)-BENGAL BOULEVARD(7800 S)TO OAXVIEW CIRCLE(7725 S) 0% 620 80,600 01301 G14-4 2500 EAST-CHALET ROAD(8030 S)TO 8200 SOUTH 0% 1,340 174,200 01301 G 14-5 2700 EAST-4215 SOUTH TO MAURICE DRIVE(4345 8) 0% 1460 159,800 01301 G 14-5 NORDIC DRIVE(8200 S)/SCANDIA WAY(8230 S)-FINLANDIA WAY(3026 E)TO DANISH ROAD(3110I 0% 1025 133,250 01301 G 14-5 4290 SOUTH(WELL HOUSE MAIN)-GLENNA DRIVE(2575 E)-TO 2700 EAST 0% 400 52,000 01301 G14-6 U OF U-22"WSP IN FRONT OF OSBORNE HALL NORTH THROUGH PARKING LOT 0% 800 250,000 01301 VARIOUS 0% 3588 80,600 21,083 01301 G15-1 WEST TEMPLE(100 W)-500 SOUTH TO 800 SOUTH(EAST SIDE MAIN) 2.240 313,600 01301 G15-1 1400 SOUTH-900 WEST TO 1000 WEST B00 64,000 DI 01301 G15-1 1000 WEST-1400 SOUTH TO 1700 SOUTH - 2,040 265,600 01301 G15-1 900 WEST-1300 SOUTH TO CALIFORNIA AVENUE(1348 S) 320 44,800 CO 01301 G15-2 WILTON WAY(2900 E)-AMBASSADOR WAY(2735 E)TO SHERWOOD DRIVE(1325 S) 1,7A0 247,800 01301 .G15-2 1700 SOUTH-FOOTHILL DRIVE(2100 E)TO WASATCH DRIVE(2520 E) 1.850 147,000 01301 G15-2 FOOTHILL DRIVE(2100 E)EAST SIDE MAIN-EMERSON AVENUE(1490 S)TO KENSINGTON AVENUE 1525 8) /50 83,000 01301 G15-3 LOGAN AVENUE(1620 S)-1000 EAST TO 1100 EAST 000 112,000 01301 G15-3 MLTON AVENUE(1595 S)-1100 EAST TO 1200 EAST 525 115,500 01301 'G15-3 1700 SOUTH-1000 EAST TO 1100 EAST 500 112,000 01301 G15-3 BRYAN AVENUE(1585 S)-900 EAST TO 1000 EAST 800 112,003 01301 G15-3 1400 EAST-1700 SOUTH AND BLAINE AVENUE(1735 S) 354 49,580 01301 G15J SUNILAND DRIVE(3550 E)-MILLSTREAM LANE(3510 S)TO END OF SUNILAND CIRCLE 870 93,800 01301 G15-4 MARDONNA WAY(3545 S)-SUNILAND DRIVE(3550 El TO MILLSTREAM DRIVE(3580 S) 700- 96.000 r OMa� MI WI r me 0 No -.. .s amp ism r - ilie Ns On Mr. M. rw• M. Me MO in �IS M.1 e-, v-, e� rig Mlle ION en an e Moak WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIX YEAR (0] qq MY11IqgppNNA� �(]]w00D OOET PROPOSAL 0101301, 01M WDIIENI OFNEE pM600 5)-11MTOYNIPoCEORNEfl]M EASMGOD OME 0000SI ,• • 000 1• 01301 0100 2700 ENT-1215 t20D I62 255,500 Otwt VARIOUS 1,Ow,Ow 01301 513301077 en COTANNER FIRE FLOW RUSE 1 25% 151000 01301 51220I30 NO COrrOJW000 TANNER FIRE FLOW PHASE M.OREER DITCH 25% 6.011 1,50,00 01301, 510002005 BIG COTTONW000 TANNER FLOW.•4600 SOUTH-00 EAST TOIFT STATION APPROX..610 ENT 300 10000 200000 01301 511301030 070006E SYSTEM FOR FIRE PROTECT..-BIO COTTONW000 25% 2251 10,000 01301 510001520100 ENT-axe SOUTH TO 00000001-0115400 2060 - 1010 1,100000 _ 01301 Y.EAST PIW0SI100W TO ARTESIAN NON SONO SIM 2000,000 01301 ORD EAST PHASE■YC.RILEY LIES SOTO 2012 1,500,000 01301 VICTORY ROAD{NMON DOWNS RIME D 70000 200.000 01501 VICTORY ROAD-BOU JOOMJS PHASED 01501 51341630 OLYMPUS COVE PUMP STATNONJRLNE FASTER PUN]0 100% .0. 150000 150030 1000,000 01501 513505057 700 NORM-EASTCAPIra MVD To EASTCAPROLIR(17T 01r MAN 100%. 01301 CITY CREEK TREATMENT UNE TO MORNS RESERVOIR(IrOR 111.MATCH E%IBTNGI 25% 0 20 IMMO 01501 FOOTHILL DRIVE(100 E)"MO SOUTH TO 1500 SOOT 100% 3000 x,00,00 013131 MILLCREER TREATMENT PLANT LIVE-TAM TO WASATCH BLVD(21l 100% SAW 750.a00 01301. WASTEWATER REUSE 10010 10,000000 ai215 L..... T751.20Z 2T70AIL 2.510.162 100.00 11.750.Iff TOTAL131511711111R1�1311 RA .SIE0BMM 070275 SSa1A Onl]w 0.5700w 0010 tw ]W0000 1a ow� 02201^SIN0(.0- 71�11S1k'R�PLACFlE3R8 �e t 400,0w 00.00 W0.o0 00,Ow 40000 11Aw 01T01I 51001030'WNW,LIE REPLACEMENTS t -1,6w,Ow 1a0.w0 I000,000 1,50,0(P 1.000 1..00 0201 51500511NM0L MUM PROGRAM 1 00,00 40000 500000 10,00 00,000 400000 033011 513000062 NEW SERVICE CONNECTIONS 1 400000 400.000 400,000 400,000 400.000 20,02 00201, 513000063(WATER METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1 --100.000 100.000_..- 500,000 500.000 500,000 500000 3.70A03 3.00.00 00 ■ . 3MAK ilir .1elEEUPBnOii 010 ARTESNN OA&N AREA FETE MLT • w.6a6 000 - CITY CREEK C CANYON BUCK 72 RAIL 30,000 00 CI(AGA RN FENCE wow --._ _ ONO FENCE AND GATE PROJECT 2500 0010 REBUILD BACK ROAD BETWEEN FILTERS AND COAL OA0 _ _ 0023 ---LANDSCAPING NORTH SIDE OF PUNT 50000 0000 ASPHALT ROAD TO BLOW OFF BOX 0000 BA IC 000 0060 CKWA HTANK ROAD 30.000 M7 DELL DAM 0170 1 _._ ASPHALT SHOPS YARD -- 100,600 01201 ASPHALT EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT nAw-" 03201 515656 IsrRArloN BUILDING AiIIIR�Ma _ 110.036 217.00 37.000 160000 60000 0 01 1all TOTAL cAPHAL IMPROVEMENTS 172622R6 1702075 9,626,000 22.221,1110 11,610. 73,76000 i- 2110.10 AUTOMOBILES 6TRU000 MC' 00101 _ 51010.315611_ 62.00 01001 CANYON PU 1622 GB x1Aw 00201 10 TON P00.1 EM CAS 24,50 _ - _ 001 (CANYON 131J.4 EAT CAB 21,500 .0i 1070N PJ 1AI LONG BED 20,Ow CANYON 1U1 CAS ,Ow 25.Ow wwl CANYON W.. CAB 5]Oxt 6100 25,00 _ - - 00001. !CANYO1101A1 EM us awp 21.500 - - -. DOW: 10 TON PU IAI M.000 _ - 01501' 'CANYON PU 110EAr cm 3100.3510 0.500 - - 01401 1 TON COS 0.4 BMW 61m10 M,57,M 105000 0201', M TON MAW 05.0w 0101 11 TON CSCW EM 201.1POR 45.000 0101' CANYON PU1TA MGM u000 _ 01701. 210 VW TON TRUCK MwWNTE 0003 1 310053001 300.000 050.00 - -- 0101 10 WHEEL CCM,TRUCE PM. 20,000 mos= 02101 (TON CACMNOOW 0110 36.000 02301 1rs TONPPI CM OCT CN 21.30 o 02 CANYON PU Mow -__17.000 25.000 ozwt 25.00 600 O w1-..."_02301 ' Pu • p0N IX.000 1200,000 1202000 1200000 -- - ti -- ew ow las ow 12w aw lxw 005 1,Zx0 MO 1]w Ow 4 0�0601 Z150w ANNATH TRAILER BIM 01701! BACK..EXC-HM�OE-FiWRAM 03,000_ 00,00 w.010 NAN 2A03. 01701 BACUJIOE OM 10110 171000 6500 WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIX YEAR BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 BUDGET COST PROJECT GROWTH PRIORITY FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR PROJECTS CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION 04 RATING PIPE 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 DELAYED 01701 TRANSPORT TRAILER _ 37595 35.000 02301 VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS 200.000 200 000 300,000 300 000 261 000 218,000 290 000 290 000. 390.000 390.000 0 2jQ 12 PUMP PLANT EQUIPMENT- 02501 TANNER RESERVOIR PRV-ADD ADDITIONAL PRV TO EXISTING STATION _ 2 80,000 02501 'MT.OLY MOTOR CONTROL 80.000 _ --T- 02501 'UPPER ELUSON(AIR COOLING UNIT) 8000 02501 45TH SOUTH PS(UPGRADE II-PUMP,MOTOR,VFD) 20,000 -_ - 02501 VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS 100,000 QQ 1QQ 100.... 1 120,000 186.000 i00.,/1, 100.�' 100J„ 10J„ 0 27MIMITREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT-WP 2774.14 _ 00701 MAG METER ON DISTRIBUTION UNES 50,000 00801 51410093 I HYPOCHLORIOE CONTAINMENT-PARLEYS 300,000 00801 KMNO4 FEEDER REPLACEMENT 80,000 00801 FLASH MIXERS 50,000 00901 ON LINE TURBIDIMETERS 8,000 00901 REPLACE ENTRANCE GATES AT LOWER END OF PLANT 15,000 01301 SAMPUNG SITES IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 150,000 01301 REPLACEMENT OF HYDROLAB FIELD WQ EQUIPMENT.AND MISCELLANEOUS FIELD ANALYZERS 50,000 01301 PLACEMENT OF BUOY ANCHORS IN MOUNTAIN DELL AND LITTLE DELL RESERVOIRS 15,000 01301. REPLACEMENT OF SOLARBEE INTAKE CONDUIT.(2-3 YEARS OUT) 25,000 25,000 00901, FINISHED WATER MEASURING DEVICE 30,000 00901 IVARIOUS ��0040 000 200.000 200.,.. 535.000 8.000 215.000 215,000 225.000 200.,'' d i 2760 IQ TELEMETRY EQUIPMENT 01501 'TELEMETRY IMPROVEMENTS 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 _ 00101 'IRRIGATION SCADA SYSTEM-PHASE II 50,000 01501 'SCADA SYSTEM REPLACEMENT - 250,000 0 300.000 50.000 50,000 50,000, 50.000- 0, 2Z49,QQI OFFICE FURNITURE 6 EQUIPMENT 01301 COPIER 10,000 03201 'SHAREPOINT SOFTWARE AND IMPLEMENTATION 30,000 03201 CITY WORKS REMOTE SOFTWARE 25,000 _ 03201 SOFTWARE UPGRADE 30,000 30,000 30,000 _ 30,000 30,000 _ 30.000 _ 03201 I BILLING SYSTEM UPGRADE _- 150,000 100.000 032011 VARIOUS 50.000 50.000 50.000 E9,119Q 180.000 195.000 80,000 80,000 80,000 8p.068 0 i j OAK)[OTHER NON-MOTIVE EQUIPMENT _ 00101 'SECURTY CAMERA AND GATE FOR ARTESIAN BASIN PROPERTY 25,000 00101 DR MOWER 5,000 00601, CITY CREEK GATE AND CAMERA SYSTEM 50,000 W0011 _CITY CREEK SIGNS 25,000 _ 01401 HYDRAUUC VALVE RUNNER AND COMPUTERIZED CONTROLS(7 TRUCKS) 59,000 _ 01501 NEW RADIOS - _ - _ 20,000 20.000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01601 LARGE FORMAT SCANNER 20,000 01701 I EMERGENCY PIPING - 50,000 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 50,000 01701 i HYDRAUUC PLATE COMPACTOR FOR BACKHOE(2) 12,000 01701, TRENCH BOXES 20,000 _ 02201; CEMENT MIXER SKID MOUNT _ 9,000 02801 HANDHELD METER READING DEVICES 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 03201 GPS VEHICLE MANAGEMENT/TRACKING SYSTEM 40,000 03201 VARIOUS 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 169.000 276,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 90.000 0 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,195,000 2,210 000 2,075,000 2,075,000 2.185.030 2,110,000 0 I I,TOTAL CAPITAL 18,187,275 20,102,075 21,816,300 11,600,000 25,406,160 13,390,000 78,785,000 I CA r SilMan NS 111111 r 81111 U a ow rvimil14,_-, ma ISEWER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2012-14 AMENDED PROJECTED Rate PROPOSEDincrease:0% Rate increase:4% Rate increase:4% FORECAST FORECAST ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET SOURCES 2009-2010 2010-11 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 REVENUES IMETERED SALES 16,826,339 $17,242,500 $17,242,500 $17,500,000 $18.200.000 $18.928.000 INTEREST INCOME 259,117 250,000 250.000 250,000 200.000 200.000 OTHER REVENUES 285,919 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 205.000 ITOTAL REVENUES 17,371,375 17,697,500 17,697,500 $ 17,955,000 $ 18,605,000 $ 19,333,000 OTHER SOURCES IIMPACT FEES 541,332 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 GRANTS&OTHER RELATED REVENUES 3,210,654 500,000 500,000 3,500,000 500,000 500,000 OTHER SOURCES - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20.000 STIMULUS GRANT 1,000,000 - BOND PROCEEDS 1.760.000 13,000,000 15,000,000 - 9.000,000 I TOTAL OTHER SOURCES 5.511.986 13,870,000 16,870,000 3,870,000 9.870.000 870.000 TOTAL SOURCES 22,883.361 31,567.500 34.567.500 $21,825,000 $28,475,000 $20,203,000' EXPENSES 8 OTHER USES 'EXPENDITURES PERSONAL SERVICES $6,420,760 $6,981,632 $8,981,632 $7,400,593 $7,474,600 $7,549,346 RATING&MAINTENANCE 1,052,965 1,205,310 1,205,310 1,217,810 1,242,166 1,267,002 VEL&TRAINING 17,403 36,294 36,294 45,494 46,404 47,332 UTILITIES 619,837 849,698 849,698 850,698 867,711 885,064 PROF&CONTRACT SERVICES 1,163,991 1,313,750 1,313,750 1,405,750 1,433,865 1,462,542 IDATA PROCESSING 203,942 240.000 240,000 240,000 244,800 249,696 FLEET MAINTENANCE 276,190 300,000 300,000 374,000 306,000 312,120 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FEE 160,832 160,000 160,000 190,000 193,800 197,678 PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES 267,989 312,000 312,000 336,000 342,720 349,574 RISK MANAGEMENT 461,462 435,000 435,000 435,000 443,700 452,574 ITRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND 21,406 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,620 32,252 OTHER CHARGES AND SERVICES (438,937) (1,495) (1,495) 12,255 12,500 12,749 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,227,840 11,863.189 11,863,189 12,538,600 12,639,886 12,817,927 OTHER USES CAPITAL OUTLAY 595.492 2,244,500 2,431,000 2,288,100 1,739,000 1,462,000 ICAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET 9,459,901 30.790,500 17,720,955 32,280,500 15,419,210 3.300,000 DEBT SERVICES 1,841,208 2,935,000 2,935,000 2,960,000 3,860,000 3,860,000 TOTAL OTHER USES 11,896,601 35,970.000 23,086,955 37,528,600 21,018,210 8,622,000 iTOTAL USES $22,124,441 $47,833,189 $34,950,144 $50,067,200 $33,658,096 $21,439,927 EXCESS REVENUE AND OTHER SOURCES OVER(UNDER)USES I $758,920 ($16,265,689) ($382,644) ($28,242,200) ($5,183,096) ($1,236,927)1 21 OPERATING CASH BALANCES BEGINNING JULY 1 $37,962,510 $38,721,430 $38,721,430 $ 38,338,786 $ 10,096,586 $ 4,913,490 ENDING JUNE 30 $38,721,430 $22,455,741 $38,338,786 $ 10,096,586 $ 4,913,490 $ 3,676,563 Cash Reserve RatioIv 379% 189% 323% 81% 39% 29% ICash reserve goal above 10% i 62 SEWER UTILITY CASH FLOW ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR 2009-20010 ,2/110-2011 2011-2012 2012,2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 SEWER SALES 16,808,524_1_ 17,242,500 17,500,000 18,200,000 18,928,000 19,874,400 20,868.120_ OTHER INCOME 303,734 205,000 205,000 205,000_ 205,000 205,000 205,000 INTEREST INCOME 259,117 250,000 250,000 2130,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 OPERATING INCOME 17,371,375 17,897,500 17,955,000 18,605,000 19,333,000 20,179,400 21,173,120 OPERATING EXPENSES (10,227,840) (11,883,189) (12,538,600) (12 639 886) (12,817,927) (12,998,795) (13,182,519) NET INCOME EXCLUDING DEP. 7,143,535 5,834,311 5,416,400 5,965 114 8,515,073 7,180,805 7,990,601 IMPACT FEES 541,332 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 BOND PROCEEDS 1,780,000 16,000,000 0 9,000,000 0 4,000,000 0 OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS 3,210,854 520,000 3,520,000 520,000 520,000 520,000 520,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY (595,492) (2,431,000) (2,288,100) (1,739,000) (1,482,000) _ (1,742,000) (1,184,000) ADDITIONAL DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 (900,000) (900,000) (1,300,000) (1,300,000) DEBT SERVICE (1,841,208) (2,935,000) (2,960,000) (2,960,000) (2,980,000) (2,980,000) (2,960,000) OTHER INCOME&EXPENSE 3,075,288 11,504,000 (1,378,100) 4,271,000 (4,452,000) (1,132,000), (4,554,000) AVAILABLE FOR CAPITAL PIMMIIIIIIIIIIr 10,218,821 17,338,311 4,038,300 10,236,114 2,063,073 6,048,605 3,436,601 r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS (9,459,901) (17,720,955) (32,280,500) (15,419,210) (3,300,000) (7,600,000) (2,850,000) CASH INCREASEI(DECREASE) 758,920 (382,644) (28,242,200) (5,183,096) (1,238,927) (1,551,395) 586.601 BEGINING CASH BALANCE 37,982,510 38,721.430 38,338,786 10,096,586 _ 4,913,490 3,878,583 2,125.168_ CASH INCREASE/(DECREASE) 758,920 (382 644) (28,242,200) (5,183,096) (1,236,927). (1,551,395) 586.601 ENDING BALANCES $38,338,786 610,096,586 54,913,490 $3,676,563 $2,125,168 52,711,7691 RATE CHANGE 4.50% 0.00%_ 4.00% 4.00% _5.00% 5.00% ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SEWER BILL(1990=576.80) 126.77 132.48 132.48 137.78 143.29 150.45 157.98 Cash Reserve Ratio 379% 323% 81% 39% 29% __-- 16% 21% Impact Fee per ERU 500 500 500 _ 500 500 _ 500 500 Number of ERU connections 1,083 700 700 700 700 700 _ _ 700 Debt Service Coverage 3.88 1.99 1.83 1.55 1.69 1.69 1.88 a ca MS IMAM. am me ens am s ii.i. ems No ewe an r s e C me Department ofPuhlic(telrnec SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY 2011-12 , to COST PROJECT FISCAL YR CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION 2011 -2012 271010 LAND 12201 LAND - 200,000 200,000 I 11201 2772.10 MAINTENANCE&REPAIR SHOPS-2720.10 11201 524905524 NEW ROOF&HVAC FOR LAB BUILDING,NEW ROOF FOR EAST MAINTENANCE AND PUI 1,080,000 11201 REPLACE NATURAL GAS LINE 600,000 1,680,000 111 10101 2772.10 LIFT STATIONS-2720.05 ,.. - 0 11201 2772.10 TREATMENT PLANTS_2720.30 -- 11201 524905215 ODOR CONTROL AND H2S MIDIGATION PROJECT 2,400,000 I 11201 524905207 SEISMIC UPGRADE - 100,000 11201 524905231 CLARIFIER REBUILD(ONE UNIT PER YEAR) 35,000 11201 524905228 SLCWRF NETWORK UPGRADE AND PLC AND ELECTICAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT 2,000,000 11201 524905232 DIGESTER GAS HOLDER REPLACEMENT AND WALL REPAIR 3,400,000 1 11201 524905233 PRIMARY SLUDGE SCREEN EQUIPMENT REPLACMENT-ROTO STEP REBUILD 50,000 11201 DOOR REPLACEMENT-10 PER YEAR FOR THREE YEARS 150,000 11201 RECOAT GRAVITY THICKENER NO 1 -MECHANICAL RAKE DRIVE AND CENTER SUPPOF 175,000 11201 COGEN ENGINE BOTTOM END REBUILD 250,000 11201 11201 DRYING BED ASHPALT REPLACEMENT 1,200,000 WAS MECHANICAL THICKENING 300,000 11201 TRICKLING FILTER PUMP-REBUILD EXISTING 350,000 11201 EVAPORATIVE COOLERS FOR COGEN 350,000 101760,000 10401 2773.10 COLLECTION LINES-2730.14 CITY.COUNTY,STATE AND MISC.DRIVEN PROJECTS 10401 500 EAST-1300 SOUTH TO BLAINE AVENUE(1735 S)-CIPP INSTALLATION 90,000 10401 500 EAST-BLAINE AVENUE(1735 S)TO 2100 SOUTH DIG AND REPLACE REPAIRS 90,000 10401 500/700 SOUTH REHAB-2800 WEST TO 5600 WEST 200,000 380,000 E OTHER PROJECTS - 104011EMERGENCIES-MISC.LOCATIONS 100,000 104011 MISC.PUBLIC SERVICE PROJECTS 200,000 10401: CONTRIBUTIONS BY DEVELOPERS _ 500,000 I 10601 CLEAN LARGE DIAMETER TRUNK LINES 500,000 1,300,000 I 1U4U1 525UU"L4U5 REPLACE VARIOUS COLLECTION LINES NORTH TEMPLE-300 WEST TO AIRPORT SEWER REPAIRS AND CIPP INSTALLATIONS 500,000 10401 524905239 MANHOLE REHABILITATIONS 350,000 I In 1 10401 ELGIN AVENUE-800 EAST TO 900 EAST 95,000 10401, 700 NORTH 1-15 BYPASS PIPE(APPROX.725 WEST) 80,000 se 104U1 4 LINCOLN STREET-2020 SOUTH TO 2098 SOUTH 75,000 10401 L 700 WEST-250 NORTH TO 300 NORTH (WEST SIDE) 70,000 1U4U1' BRYAN AVENUE-1700 EAST TO 1800 EAST 67,000 1 U401 i 700 SOUTH-#40 WEST TO STATE STREET (SWC SOUTH SIDE) 65,000 • 1U401' 2200 WEST-600 NORTH TO 700 NORTH 60,000 10401 CRANDALL AVENUE-900 EAST TO 1087 EAST 55,000 10401 CHARLTON AVENUE-1168 EAST TO 1100 EAST 50,000 10401 INDEPENDENCE BLVD. MIAMI ROAD 46,000 1 U401 700 SOUTH-#5 WEST TO 300 WEST (NORTH SIDE) 45,000 1U4U1 HARRISON AVENUE-1300 EAST TO 1500 EAST 45,000 10401 HARRISON AVENUE-1800 EAST TO 1860 EAST 45,000 10401 100 SOUTH-600 EAST TO 470 EAST (SOUTH SIDE) 42,000 10401 300 SOUTH-600 TO 800 EAST (SOUTH SIDE) 42,000 M1 1U401 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE-1746 EAST TO 1864 EAST 42,000 a 64 ir Department of Public Utduie.c SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY 2011-12 COST PROJECT FISCAL YRI CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION 2011 -2012 1 0401 1200 EAST-400 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH (WEST SIDE) 40,000 10401 500 EAST-500 SOUTH TO 600 SOUTH (EAST SIDE) 40,000 10401 ELIZABETH STREET-CONDOS WEST SIDE 2570 SOUTH TO 2560 SOUTH 40,000 10401 ALLEY EAST OF 1300 EAST-150 SOUTH TO 100 S EAST SIDE IN YARDS 35,000 10401 CHICAGO STREET-446 NORTH TO 500 NORTH 35,000 1 U4U1 1600 EAST-RAMONA AVENUE TO 2100 SOUTH 33,000 1 U401 PARK STREET-2310 SOUTH TO 2346 SOUTH 33,000 10401 1600 EAST-DOWNINGTON AVENUE TO WILSON AVENUE 32,000 1U4U1 CHARLTON AVENUE- HIGHLAND DRIVE TO 1100 EAST (RODDING ROUTE PROVIDE VII 25,000 10401 DOWNINGTON AVENUE-1700 EAST TO 1800 EAST 25,000 10401 1200 EAST-400 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH (WEST SIDE) 23,000 I 1 U401 900 EAST-600 SOUTH TO 700 SOUTH (EAST SIDE) 22,000 10401 700 SOUTH-700 EAST TO 736 EAST(SOUTH SIDE) 20,000 10401 MARION STREET-444 NORTH TO 500 NORTH 20,000 10401 SHERIDAN ROAD-1970 EAST TO 2010 EAST 18,000 10401 MAIN STREET-1739 SOUTH TO 1705 SOUTH (EAST SIDE) 12,500 10401 100 SOUTH-840 EAST TO 800 EAST (SOUTH SIDE) 8,500 10401 525002476 SEWER TREATMENT PLANT SEWER CIPP REHABILITATION _ 70,000 10401 525002477 100 SOUTH-320 EAST TO 300 EAST 7,500 10401 525002478 EASEMENT-EMERSON AVENUE-2420 EAST TO 2340 EAST 18,000 10401 525002479 600 EAST-SOUTH TEMPLE TO 100 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) 18,000 10401 525002480 500 NORTH-200 WEST TO 300 WEST(NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES) 110,000 10401 525002481 UNIVERSITY STREET(1340 E)-200 SOUTH TO 400 SOUTH 35,000 10401 525002482 400 SOUTH-1300 EAST(SEC)TO 1340 EAST(SOUTH SIDE) 8,500 10401 525002483 "J"STREET-8TH AVENUE TO 7TH AVENUE 8,500 10401 525002484 ARDMORE PLACE(350 N)-220 WEST TO 300 WEST 13,000 10401 525002485 EASEMENT EAST AND WEST OF MARION STREET-500 NORTH TO 600 NORTH 45,000 10401 525002486 700 SOUTH-1250 EAST TO 1300 EAST(NORTH SIDE) 18,000 10401 525002487 BRYAN AVENUE(1560 S)-2337 EAST TO 2300 EAST 10,500 10401 525002488 300 WEST-560 NORTH TO 600 NORTH (EAST SIDE) 40,000 fl 10401 525002489 200 EAST-400 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) 35,000 10401 525002490 1000 EAST-300 SOUTH TO 400 SOUTH(WEST SIDE)/350 SOUTH 400 SOUTH(EAST SIC 25,000 10401 525002491 CENTER STREET(420 N)-MAIN STREET TO APRICOT AVENUE(345 N) 37,00C 10401 525002492 APRICOT AVENUE(345 N)-CENTER STREET(420 N)TO QUINCE STREET(140 W) 15,000 10401 525002493 NORTH TEMPLE AIRPORT RAMPS AT WINGPOINT GOLF COURSE-WEST SIDE OF BAN 90,000 10401 525002494 600 NORTH-200 WEST TO 300 WEST(NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES) 85,000 10401 525002495 5TH AVENUE 0"j"STREET TO"K"STREET 8,500 10401 525002496 EASEMENT FORREST GLEN APARTMENTS-1100 EAST(IN YARDS ALONG EAST SIDE C 20,000 10401 525002497 REDONDO AVENUE(2015 E)-300 EAST TO 350 EAST 17,000 MASTER PLAN PROJECTS 10401 525002072 NORTHWEST OIL DRAIN REMEDIATION STUDY 4,500,000 10401 5250U2423 1500 SOUTH-2700 WEST TO REDWOOD ROAD CONSTRUCTION MP 7A 30,000 10401 UHANGt S I KEE 11-tl0 I U CALIFORNIA AVtNUt 10,000,UUU 10401 OKANGt S I KEE I I-8U I U CALIFUKNIA MISC.PUIN I KtPAIKS. 300,000 10401 tf PEKMANEN I FLOW MUNI I UKS PEK MAS I tK PLAN 1(iU,000 17 960.500 TOTAL COLLECTION LINES 19 640 500 2730.20 LANDSCAPING-WIP 52-10401-2773.10 Total Landscaping • TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 32 280 51 2750.10 AUTOMOBILES&TRUCKS _ 10401 CANYON PU 4X4 EXT CAB(REPLACE 33680) 22,500 10401 CANYON PU 4X4 EXT CAB(REPLACE 33690) 22.500 10601 1/4 TON PICKUP EXT CAB 4X4(REPLACE 33500) 23,000 10601 2 TON BOBTAIL DUMP(REPLACE 3331) 70.000 12301 BOBTAIL DUMPTRUCK FOR RAG&GRIT BAYS 120,000 65 1111.1.110 /Jepnnment of Public ludmes III SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY 2011-12 li MMM FISCAL YR 2011-20�2 213;000 2750.30 FIELD MAINTENANCLEQUIP, 10601 BACKHOE EXCHANGE 9.000 I 10601. HP JETTER TRUCK -- 260,000 12301 LOADER REPLACEMENT 260,000 12301 STREET SWEEPER 300,000 829,000 2760.20 TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT-WIP 2774j0 10101 EXTRA PUMP FOR 700 SOUTH LIFT STATION 8,000 12201 DIAPHRAGM PUMPS 10,000 I _12201 BLOWERS 50,000 _12201 PUMPS 150,000 12201 H2S DETECTION EQUIPMENT FOR WET WELLS AND RAG RAKE BUILDING 25,000 12201 SENSOR REPLACEMENT _- 25,000 I _ 12201 SCBA EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 50,000 12201' TRICKLING FILTER VMS REPLACEMENT 20,000 12201 COMPRESSORS 50,000 - - -_-- 388,000 2760.30 TELEMETERING EQUIPMENT 11201 524905149 TELEMETERING UPGRADE-REPLACE _ 10,000 10101 SCADA SYSTEM REPLACE -- - , 50,000 60,000 2780.50 OFFICE FURNITURE&EQUIPMENT 12201 SOFTWARE UPGRADE 20,000 12201, 52540027 TELEPHONE UPGRADE 250,000 12201 MP2 UPGRADE _ 50,000 I L_ 12401 PRETREATMENT SOFTWARE 90,000 ir 410,000 2760.90 OTHER NON-MOTIVE EQUIPMENT 10101 60 KW GENERATOR 30,000 10101 PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE 10,000 10601 LUMBERJACK ROOT CUTTER 17,000 10601 VENTURI CLEANING NOZZLE 5,600 I 10601 QUICK COUPLING BACKHOE ATTACHMENT_ _ 5,500 10601, NEW RADIO'S 10,000 10801' PORTABLE TELESCOPIC INSPECTION CAMERA 20,000 10801 LATERAL CAMERA - 10,000 I 10801 PAN&TILT CAMERA WITH TRANSPORTER 35,000 11101 STAND ALONE IC ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENET 35,000 11701 _ SERVER UPGRADE 30,000 11201 FLOW METER REPLACEMENTS/SAMPLER REPLACEMENT _ 10,000 I 12201 52540027 PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE 150,000 12201 STATIONARY SAMPLER WIENCLOSURE 10,000 12401 AUTO SAMPLERS 10,000 388,100 I TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,288,100 GRAND TOTAL 34,568,600 66 I SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIR YEAR BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2911.12 BUDGET FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR PROSE It� 12201, LAND 200.030 -- -- - -- 0000 0 0 d 0 11pl 2772 MMITENANCE 8 REPAIR SHOPS-2720.1Q __ 1120 PLANT SECURITY SYSTEM 1 125.000 11201' 524905524 NEW ROOF 8 HVAC FOR LAB BUILDING,NEW ROOF FOR EAST MAINTENANCE AND PUMP PLANT 1 1,060,000 _ 11201; ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING EXTENSION 3 _ 900000 112011 REROOF MID PANTING OF DIGESTER CONTROL BUILDING 2 180.000 11201i REHAP OPERATION BUILDING 1 303.000 11201i REPLACE NATURAL GAS UNE 1 _1:1 i.1i'.r.' 0 160.®0 0 0 uggp. i 30101 277210,LIIIETATIONB-2729M 10101 PUMP REPLACEMENT 1 50000 50,000. 50,000. 50000, 50000 10101 62400747 AIRPORT TERMINAL 92 RELOCATION 1 80.000 10101 700 SOUTH LIFT STATION UPGRADE 4 1,700,000 10101 WRIGHT BROTHERS DRIVE AMELIA EARHART DRIVE(35014)LIFT STATION PUMP REPLACEMENT 1 110.000 10101 PUMP STATION ON 40TH WEST 4 2.000,000 210,000 0 80.000 50.003 50003 50.000 3,700000 11201 2772.10 TREATMENTPLANTS•272E.1R , 11201 524905215 ODOR CONTROL AND H2S MIDIGATION PROJECT 1 360,000 2.400,030 11201I. 524905207-SEISMIC UPGRADE 2 100,003 11201' 524905231 1 CLARIFIER REBUILD(ONE UNIT PER YEAR) 2 36000 35.000 35.000 11201 524905228 SLCWRF NETWORK UPGRADE AND PLC AND ELECTICAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT BOND 2012 1 250000 2.000.000 3,030,000 11201 524935232 DIGESTER GAS HOLDER REPLACEMENT AND WALL REPAIR BOND 2000 1 8,100,000 3,400,000 839.210 , 11201 524905233(PRIMARY SLUDGE SCREEN EQUIPMENTREPLACMENT-RROTO STEP REBUILD 1 50.000 450000_ _ 11201 524906241.TREATMENT PLANT PUMP STATION 1 50,000 11201 524905248i INSTALLATION OF WEIRS AND BAFFLES FOR SECONDARY CLARIFIERS 588 1 500,000 112011 DOOR REPLACEMENT•10 PER YEAR FOR THREE YEARS 1 150,000 11201111 524905238',BIO SOLIDS STUDY 1 235,000 112011 524905203 SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION 1 205,000 11201 MECHANICAL DEWATERING SYSTEM 1 4000000 11201 524905237'EFFLUENT DISINFECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE 3 13,000.000 11201 524935187'IRON SPONGE 1 380,000 11201 EXPAND INFLUENT SCREENS AT THE INFLUENT PUMP STATION 3 7 800,000 11201 GATE REPAIR AT CHLORINE CONTACT BASIN 1 755000 11201 INSTALL STRUCTURAL BRACING IN THE GRIT CHAMBERS 1 100,030 11201 REPLACE HEAT TRACING ON GREASE LINES 1 30,000 11201 REPLACEMENT OF GRIT CHANNEL AIR PIPING 1 70,030 11201 RECOAT GRAVITY THICKENER NO I-MECHANICAL RAKE ORIVE AND CENTER SUPPORT 1 175,000 , 11201 COGEN ENGINE BOTTOM END REBUILD 250,030 , 11201 DRYING BED ASHPALT REPLACEMENT BOND2010 1 1,200,000 11201 WAS MECHANICAL THICKENING BOND2012 1 300,003 4,000,030 11201 WWTP FACILITIES CAPACITY EVALUATION 2 300,000 11201 TRICKLING FILTER PUMP-REBUILD EXISTING 2 350.000 11201 REPLACE TRICKLING FILTER PUMP STATION 3 12,000.030 11201, EVAPORATIVE COOLERS FOR COGEN 1 807 350000 9140755 10.760000 8 824 210 0 0 0 37 MO QM 10401 10401 900 EAST-900 SOUTH TO 2100 SOUTH(MISC REPAIRS NECESSARY)APPROX.4COLF 1 5503 10401' 525002297 1303 EAST-SOUTH TEMPLE TO 500 SOUTH 2 20,000 W 10401: 525002532 500 EAST-1300 SOUTH TO BLAINE AVENUE(1735 SI-DIG AND REPLACE REPAIRS 1 155 90A00 r 10401' 525002533 500 EAST-1300 SOUTH TO BLAINE AVENUE(1735 S)-CIPP INSTALLATION 1 3,300 90.000 ' 10401 525002534 500 EAST.BLAINE AVENUE(17365)TO 2100 SOUTH-DIG AND REPLACE REPAIRS 1 180 90A03 10401 525002535 500 EAST-BLAINE AVENUE(1735 5)TO 2100 SOUTH-CIPP INSTALLATION 1 2,550 76.000 10401 525002531 500/700 SOUTH REHAB-2900 WEST TO 5600 WEST 1 200000 200,000 200000 200.000 —._ 5.300 90000 3LnT80 298.000 200000 200 OW 0 Q OTHER PROJECTS 10401 EMERGENCIES-MISC.LOCATONS 1 100,000 100.000 100,030 100,003 100.000 100,000 MISC.PUBLIC SERVICE PROJECTS 1 200000 200.000 200000 200000 200000 000 MI =Ill .. _ _ _ . , - _ _ - _ _ _ - ad SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIX YEAR BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 BUDGET COST PROJECT ,-. ..- . ..RITY FEET OF FN- YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR PROJECTS CENT R NUMBER DE CRIPTI.N i, •IPE i, ....11 2011-2012 2012- 013 .13.2014 2014- 015 2015-2.16 DELAYED 10401 CONTRIBUTIONS BY DEVELOPERS _ I 1 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000` 500 000 _ 10601 l CLEAN LARGE DIAMETER TRUNK LINES 1 ] 500,000 500,000 800 000 1.300.000 1 300.400, 800 000 800 000 800 000 0 REPLACE VARIOUS COLLECTION UNES 10401 525002405 NORTH TEMPLE-300 WEST TO AIRPORT SEWER REPAIRS AND CIPP INSTALLATIONS 1 500,000 500,000 10401 5250024U8 2300 EAST-WILMINGTON CIR TO 2100 SOUTH 1 1,160 100,000 10401 525W2409 1200 WEST-225 SOUTH TO 265 SOUTH 1 145 75,000 10401 525002410 SIMPSON AVENUE-1300 EAST TO HIGHLAND DRIVE 1300 EAST-SIMPSON AVE TO 2300 SOUTH 1 2,230 60,000 10401 525002411 500 NORTH-1040 WEST TO 1100 WEST SEC SOUTH SIDE 1 380 36,000 10401 525002412 1100 EAST-400 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH(WEST SIDE) 1 670 25,000 1 U401 525002413 BRYAN AVENUE-1700 EAST TO 1800 EAST 1 865 67,000 10401 525002414 4TH AVENUE-"A'STREET TO CANYON ROAD 1 650 31,000 10401 525U02413 100 SOUTH-840 EAST TO 800 EAST(SOUTH SIDE) 1 720 18,000 10401' 525002416 300 SOUTH 400 WEST-NEC TO RIO GRANDE 1 464 18,000 1U401 52500241/1 1100 EAST-LAIRD(1205 S)TO 1300 SOUTH 1 394 13,000 _ _ _ _ 10401 5250024181400 SOUTH-UNIVERSITY STREET(1340 E)TO 1300 EAST(NORTH SIDE) 1 376 13,000 10401 525002419 2000 EAST-1841 SOUTH TO 1895 SOUTH 1 384 11,000 104U1 5250U24213 700 EAST-2622 SOUTH TO 2700 SOUTH 1 320 8,500 10401 525W2420 EASEMENT 1422 SOUTH-BEACON DRIVE TO 2300 EAST 1 293 8,000 10401 52000242111500 SOUTH-2700 WEST TO REDWOOD ROAD PIPE REPLACEMENT-DESIGN MP 7A 1 5,200 150,000 1 U4U1 525 024241900 EAST-2986 SOUTH TO 2700 SOUTH 1 1,944 245,000 __J _ 10401 52501.12425 700 SOUTH-4700 WEST TO 4800 WEST(NORTH SIDE)42'PIPE 1 277 200,000 10401 5250(12426 900 WEST-1017 SOUTH TO FAYETTE AVENUE(975 S) 1 358 160,000 10401 52500242/800 SOUTH-239 EAST TO 200 EAST (NORTH SIDE) 1 230 130,000 10401 524905239 MANHOLE REHABILITATIONS 1 500,000 350,000 10401 52490750 700 SOUTH 4700 WEST LIFT STATION WET WELL RELINING 1 297,000 10401 525002359 STATE STREET-BELMONTAVENUE TO WILLIAMS AVENUE(EAST SIDE) 1 335 16,000 10401 525002322 STATE STREET-910 SOUTH TO 940 SOUTH(WEST SIDE) 1 360 12,000 10401' 525002360 STATE STREET 1694 SOUTH(WEST SIDE) 1 - 375 r, 15,000 10401 525002361 STATE STREET-KENSINGTON AVENUE TO 33'NORTH 1 380 50,000 10401 5250023621 STATE STREET-800 SOUTH TO 900 SOUTH(WESTSIDE 800 TO 850 S EAST SIDE 850 TO 900 S) 1 705 31,000 10401 525002208 i AIRPORT ROAD 3700 WEST(490 N TO 600 N) 1 310 17,000 10401 525002356 ZENITH AVENUE-1186 EAST TO 1248 EAST 1 305 31,000 10401 525002378,COLORADO STREET-1200 NORTH TO GOODWIN AVENUE(1150 NORTH 1 1 230 110,000 10401 525002358 VIRGINIA STREET-SOUTH TEMPLE TO PERRY AVENUE 1 320 31,000 10401 525002381 AMERICAN AVENUE-1400 WEST TO PUEBLO STREET 1 375 31,000 10401 525002382 CRYSTAL AVENUE-2114 EAST TO STRATFORD AVENUE 1 325 31,000 _ 10401 525002366 IOLA STREET(290 SOUTH)-NAVAJO STREET TO CONCORD STREET 1 625 31,000 10401, 525002383.200 WEST-500 SOUTH TO 600 SOUTH(WEST SIDE) 1 670 31,000 10401, 525002384'200 WEST-500 SOUTH TO 600 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) 1 670 31,000 104011 535002385 I STEWART STREET-1218 SOUTH TO 1244 SOUTH 1 350 80,000 10401 5250023681400 NORTH-500 WEST TO HODGES LANE(650 WEST) 1 1,180 31,000 10401' 5250023871400 NORTH-900 WEST TO 1000 WEST(NORTH SIDE) 1 665 190,000 _ 10401 525002392 200 NORTH-580 WEST TO 500 WEST(NORTH SIDE) 1 ' 200 115,000 10401 525002371 CHADWICK STREET-2771 SOUTH TO 2800 SOUTH AND EASEMENT CHADWICK TO DEARBORNE 1 595 31,000 _ 104011 525002372 1800 EAST-2240 SOUTH TO 2332 SOUTH 1 720 31,000 104011 525002374 200 SOUTH-900 EAST TO 1000 EAST (NORTH SIDE) 1 726 31,000 10401 525002331 HARVARD AVENUE(1125)SOUTH-1800 EAST TO 1900 EAST 1 - 735 31,000 10401 525002335 CORNELL CIRCLE(1733E 1300 S) 1 485 31,000 _ 10401 525002290 MILSEV1C SEWER MAIN EXT. 1 27,000 10401 I 525002363 WARM SPRINGS ROAD 700 WEST 1 31,000 10401 525002288 ALLEY NORTH OF SIMONDI AVE 1 3,200 104011 525002297'1300E SOUTH TEMPLE TO 250 S 1 27,000 10401. 525002334 1800 EAST HARVARD AVE TO PRINCETON 1 67,000 10401' 525002429 NORTH TEMPLE 300 WEST TO 2030 WEST 1-215 1 31,000 10401' 525002430 EASEMENT TO AND FROM BONNEVILLE LIFT STATION 1 31,000 104011 525002431 1800 NORTH 975 WEST TO 900 WEST 1 31,000 10401; _ _525002432 STATE STREET 1694 SOUTH TO 1612 SOUTH 1 31,000 10401 525002433 STATE STREET KENSINGTON AVENUE TO 1472 SOUTH 1 31,000 104011 EAST CAPITOL BOULEVARD-NORTH SANDRUN ROAD TO 915 NORTH 1 5,500 CO 10401 200 WEST-GIRARD AVENUE(545 N)TO 504 NORTH(NEC EAST SIDE) 1 7,000 CO 104131 525002443'ELGIN AVENUE-800 EAST TO 900 EAST 1 930 95,000 10401 525002444 700 NORTH 1-15 BYPASS PIPE(APPROX725 WEST) 1 360 _ 80,000 10401 525002445 LINCOLN STREET-2020 SOUTH TO 2098 SOUTH 1 485 75,000 10401 525002446'700 WEST-250 NORTH TO 300 NORTH(WEST SIDE) 1 470 70,000 10401 525002447 BRYAN AVENUE-1700 EAST TO 1800 EAST 1 1,645 67,000 10401 525002448 700 SOUTH-($40 WEST TO STATE STREET 1SWC SOUTH SIDE) 1 385 65.000 1041.11 525002449,2200 WEST-600 NORTH TO 700 NORTH 1 980 60,000 I f I SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIX YEAR BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 201112 BUDGET igir '!' .: i4 1325002450 CRAIDALL AVENUE-903 EASTTO 1087 EAST 1.463 55030_. T010T' 525002451''CHARLTON AVENUE-1168 EAST TO 1100 EAST 380 50030 1W01 525002452'INDEPENDENCE BLVD.MIAMI ROAD 75 46.000 1.01 525002453 700 SOUTH-85 WEST TO 300 WEST(NORTH SIDE) 720 45,000 104U1 525002454 HARRISON AVENUE-1300 EAST TO 1560 EAST • 1,610 45.000 10401 525002455 HARRISON AVENUE-1800 EAST TO 11360 EAST SOO 45.000 10401 525002456.100 SOUTH-600 EAST TO 470 EAST(SOUTH SIDE) 820 42,000 1001 525002457 300 SOUTH-600 TO 800 EAST(SOUTH SIDE) 1,600 42,000 104D1 525002458 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE-1748 EAST T01834 EAST 823 42,000 104U1 525302459 1200 EAST-400 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH(WEST SIDE) 675 40,000 _ 10401 525002460 500 EAST=WO SOUTH TO 800 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) 720 40.000 10161 525002451 ELIZABETH STREET-CONDOS WEST SIDE 2570 SOUTH TO 2560 SOUTH 140 40000 10101 525002482 ALLEY EAST OF 1300 EAST-150 SOUTH TO 100 S EAST SIDE IN YARDS 377 35.000 - 10W1 525002453 CHICAGO STREET-446 NORTH TO 500 NORTH 342 35.000 10401 525002464 1600 EAST-RAMONA AVENUE TO 2100 SOUTH 1,180 33.000 -- -- --- lT/1DT 525002465 PARK STREET-2310 SOUTH TO 2348 SOUTH 350 33,000 10401_ 525002466 1600 EAST-DOWNINGTON AVENUE TO WILSON AVENUE 362 32,030 10401 525002467),CHARLTON AVENUE-HIGHLAND DRIVE TO 1100 EAST(RODDNO ROUTE PROVIDE NOEO TO 1100 E, 25000 1VW1 525002468.DOWNINGTON AVENUE-1700 EAST TO 1800 EAST 752 25000 _ TMR 525002469 1200 EAST-400 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH (WEST SIDE) 670 28000 - T9W1 525002470 1900 EAST-elm SOUTH TO 700 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) 715 22,000 1140T1 525002471 1700 SOUTH-700 EAST TO 736 EAST(SOUTH SIDE) 400 20,000 1U18TT 525002472!MARION STREET-444 NORTH TO 500 NORTH 320 20000 10401, 525002473 I SHERIDAN ROAD-1970 EAST TO 2010 EAST 695 16000 - --- 10W1 525002474 MAIN STREET-1739 SOUTH TO 1705 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) 327 12.500 - ..... .- _._ TO4,71 525002475 100 SOUTH-840 EAST TO BOO EAST(SOUTH SIDE) T 368 8.500 10401 525002478 SEWER TREATMENT PLANT SEWER CIPP REHABILITATION 70.000 10401 525002477 100 SOUTH-320 EAST TO 300 EAST - 7,600 10401 525002478 EASEMENT-EMERSON AVENUE-2420 EAST TO 2340 EAST 18,000 10401 525002479 600 EAST-SOUTH TEMPLE TO 100 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) - 18,000 10401 525002480 500 NORTH-200 WEST TO 300 WEST(NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES) 110,000 10401 525002481 UNIVERSITY STREET(1340 E)-200 SOUTH TO 400 SOUTH - 35.000 10401 525002482 400 SOUTH-1300 EAST(SEC)TO 1340 EAST(SOUTH SIDE) 8,500 104011 525002483..7 STREET-BTH AVENUE TO 7TH AVENUE 8,500 104011 525002484 ARDMORE PLACE(350 N)-220 WEST TO 300 WEST 13600 10401 525002485.EASEMENT EAST AND WEST OF MARION STREET-500 NORTH TO 000 NORTH 45.000 10401 525002488 700 SOUTH-1250 EAST TO 1300 EAST(NORTH SIDE) 18.000 10401 525002467 BRYAN AVENUE(1560 SI-2337 EAST TO 2300 EAST 10.600 10401, 5250024361300 WEST-580 NORTH TO 600 NORTH(EAST SIDE) _ 40.000 10401 525002489''200 EAST-400 SOUTH TO 503 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) , 35,000 10401 525002490 1000 EAST-300 SOUTH TO 400 SOUTH(WEST SIDE)/360 SOUTH 400 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) 25,000 10401 525002491 CENTER STREET(420 N)-MMAIN STREET TO APRICOT AVENUE(345 N) 37,000 10401 525002492'APRICOT AVENUE(345 N)-CENTER STREET(420 NI TO QUINCE STREET(1401N) 15,000 10401 525002493 NORTH TEMPLE AIRPORT RAMPS AT WINGPOINT GOLF COURSE-WEST SIDE OF BANG( 90,000 - - 10401 525002494 800 NORTH-200 WEST TO 300 WEST(NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES) 85.000 10401 525002495 5TH AVENUE 04 STREET TO IC STREET 8,600 10401 525E0249e EASEMENT FORREST GLEN APARTMENTS-1100 EAST(IN YARDS ALONG EAST SIDE OF FORREST G4 1 20000 10401 525E02497 REDONDO AVENUE(2015 E)-300 EAST TO 350 EAST 17,000 1010T 525002498 GARFIELD AVENUE-1500 EAST TO 1900 EAST 3671 75.000 109)1 525002499 300 SOUTH-800 EAST TO 600 EAST(SOUTH SIDE) 1.465 42.000 10401 525002560 500 EAST-500 SOUTH TO 800 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) 720 38,000 T0101 525002501 1500 EAST-282850UTH TO 2830 SOUTH 310 35,000 —TT1401. 525602502 1600 EAST-RAMONA AVENUE TO 2100 SOUTH 1,180 32.000 10401 525032503 1700 EAST-HARVARD AVENUE TO 1250 SOUTH 880 25,000 —TM, 525602504 900 EAST-700 SOUTH TO 800 SOUTH(WEST SIDE) 715 22,000 —TOOT 525E02505 1300 EAST-SIMPSON AVENUE TO 22135 SOUTH 660 20,000 11.401, 525032503 ALLEY WEST OF 900 EAST-950 SOUTH TO 900 SOUTH 333 20,000 --TTHOT 525002507 3230 WEST-1820 SOUTH TO 1670 SOUTH REPLACEMENT 1.100 434,408 —034U1 525002506 400 SOUTH-400 WEST TO REO GRANDE(NORTH SIDE) 375 ' 9,500 10NI1 525002509 500 SOUTH AND 1500 EAST-1C PLUG VALVE 100000 1060 525002510 700 SOUTH-4850 WEST TO GLADIOLA REPLACEMENT 9603 9,682200 11M91 525002511 500 SOUTH-GLADIOLA STREET TO ORANGE STREET PIPE REPLACEMENT 7603 8,748,988 H1 11, 525002512 STATE STREET 500 SOUTH DVERSION PPE DOWNSTREAM OF DIVERSION STRUCTURE 3.400 1,972.063 WW1 525002513 STATE STREET 500 SOUTH DIVERSION IMPROVEMENT _ 270,000 1811,1 525032514 GUARDSMAN WAY INTERCEPTOR MP 5 63,500 11M11 525002515 500 SOUTH INTERCEPTOR-ORANGE STREET TO 1000 WEST CONSTRUCTION MP 9A 7.000 7800000 10681 525002518 900 EAST-2820 T02920 SOUTH Bhp 500,000 104011 525002517 900 WEST DIVERSION STRUCTURE-400 SOUTH TO 800 SOUTH 1,000000 10401 525002518 500 SOUTH STATE STREET DIVERSION MODIFICATIONS 500,000 10401' 525002519 NORTHWEST QUADRANT/TREATMENT PLANT(4700 WEST) 300,00016 1 I 5250082 1300 WEST BETWEEN 300 NORTH 8 W WTP (THOMPSONJttSELL ENGINEERING) 500.030 10,000.000 1 VARIOUSLINE REPLACEMENT 2 2 I ale MO OW Mill S /I MID MIme me2. iiiiI a Pepar'moil,,/l':,hll[I'll/ll,e, SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIX YEAR BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 BUDGET COST PROJECT GROWTH PRIORITY FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCALYR FISCAL-YR' FISCALYR F FISCAL YR PROJECTS CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION % RATING PIPE 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 201 6 2015-2016 DELAYED MASTER PLAN PROJECTS _ 10401 525002378 1800 N BECK ST TO PRE-TREATMENT PLANT Impact Fees 1 1 2,300,000 10401 525002072 NORTHWEST OIL DRAIN REMEDIATION STUDY 1 500 000 4,500.000 10401 b2b0U2423 1500 SOUTH-2700 WEST TO REDWOOD ROAD CONSTRUCTION MP 7A BOND 2012 - 1 5.200 30,000 2,200,000 10401 525002520 I UHANGE SINI1-00 I U CALIFORNIA AVENUE BOND 2010 1 10850' 1 U,000,UW 10401 525002521 ORANGE S I Nth I NUR I H I EMPLE 10 1-80 -PIPE HtHAB BOND 2014 13NU i 1,800,000 10401 525002522 I ORANGE SI KEE 11-50 I0 CALIFORNIA AVENUE DESIGN BOND 2014 3 U 500,000 10401 525002523.1 B"HOPE UYPASS CASING UNDER 1-81/1/5 10 2W SIX I H UN ORANGE S I HEE I BOND 2014 3 1030 --- 750,000 10401 525002524.500 SOUTH INTERCEPTOR S ;IORAANG STREET TO 1000 WEST-DESIGN STUDY MP 9A BOND 2014, 3 76,E 100,000 1,200,000 10401 525002525 (a170,000 830,000 10401 525002528 IC-MANGE S I NEE I I-50 I U CALIFORNIA MISC.PUINI REPAIRS. 1 300,000 10401 525002527 UUAHUSMAN WAY INIERUEPIUR 4 110 85000 10401 525002528 N PEHMANEN I FLOW MUNI I OHS PER MAS I ER PLAN 1 160,000 10401 525002529 3230 WE51-1520 SOU IN 1016/0 SOU I 1 1,200 500000 10401 525002530 1 W SOU I H 12W LAS I DIVERSION I-UN UAPACI I Y 1 110 /0,0(X) 1 6 995 200 17.960 500 5 100 000 2100 000 6.550.000 2.000.000 42 221.659 1 TOTAL COLLECTION LINES 7 885 200 19 640 500 6 695 000 3.100.000 7 550 000 2.800 000 42 223.659 2730.20 NDSCAPING-WIP 52-10401-2773.10 11201 524905219 ASPHALTING 50,000 _ Total Landscaping _ 9 0 501090, 0l Q 0 0 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 17.720.955 32.280 500 15.419210 3 300 000 7 600.000 2.850.000 84.423.659 2750.1 Q 1 AUTOMOBILES&TRUCKS 10401 1/2 TON W/UTILITY BED 31,000 10401 CANYON PU 4X4 EXT CAB(REPLACE 33680) 21,500 22,500 10401 CANYON PU 4X4 EXT CAB(REPLACE 33690) 22,500 10601 1/4 TON PICKUP EXT CAB 35,000 10801 '1/4 TON PICKUP EXT CAB 4X4(REPLACE 33500) 35,000 23,000 10601 12 TON BOBTAIL DUMP(REPLACE 3331) 70,000 10601 I3/4 TON PICK UP 4X4 35,000 10601 3/4 TON PICKUP 4X4 W/SERVICE BODY 35,000 10601 3/4 TON PICKUP 4X4 W/EXT CAB 38,000 10601 10 WHEEL DUMP 120,000 123011 3/4 TON W/UTILITY BED 40,000 12301: :3/4 TON W/RACK 28,000 - _ _ ___ 12301: 1 1/2TON TRUCK W/FLATBED 35,000 12301 'BOBTAIL DUMPTRUCK FOR RAG&GRIT BAYS 120,000 12301 3/4 4X4 PICKUP 40,000 12301, VARIOUS 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 I • 491.500 213.000 400 000 400.000 400 000 400.000 0 2750 30 EIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIP - 10601 BACKHOE EXCHANGE 9,000 9,000 10,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 10801 VACTOR 290,000 290,000 10801 T V VAN 190,000 10801 HP JETTER TRUCK 260,000 280,000 280,000 10601 VARIOUS 300,000 300,000 12301 LOADER REPLACEMENT 260,000 - 12301 STREET SWEEPER 300,000 10601. VARIOUS 300.000 300.000 300.000 300-000 0 489,000 829,000 870,000 602.000 873.000 314,000 0 278020 TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT-IMP 2774.1Q 10101 EXTRA PUMP FOR 700 SOUTH LIFT STATION 8,000 12201 DIAPHRAGM PUMPS 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 12201 524905243 PRIMARY SLUDGE PUMP REPLACEMENT 800,000 12201 BLOWERS 50.000 50.000 50.000 50,000 50,000 .m of I1,Al,�111,1,1,u SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIX YEAR BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011.12 BUDGET 12201 PUMPS _ 160,000 150.000 150,030 _150,000 150,000 1•'9030 12201 H2S DETECTION EQUIPMENT FOR WET WELLS AND RAG RAKE BUILDING 25.000 12201 ;SENSOR REPLACEMENT 25,000 122011 'SCBA EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT -- -- 50.000 - 12201, TRICKLING FILTER VFO'S REPLACEMENT 20.000 _ 12201 COMPRESSORS 50000 50000 50000 50,,, 50,,, 60000 1.000.000 085A0 280.000 .,,,, 100,,, 280000 0 276030 TELEMETERING EQUIPMENT _ 11201, 5241105149'TELEMETERING UPGRADE-REPLACE 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10.00 10,000 10101 SCADA SYSTEM REPLACE _ 50,000 10,000 10,000 10.000 10000 50000 20.000 20000 20003 10000 0 2100.30.OFFICE FURNITURE 9 EQUIPMENT 12201 'SOFTWARE UPGRADE 16,000 20,000 20,030 20.003 20000. 20000. 12201 - 52540027 TELEPHONE UPGRADE _ 250,000 12201 MP2 UPGRADE _ 50.003 12491 PRETREATMENT SOFTWARE 90000 15000 410000 20000 20.000 20.000 20.000 0 __ 2_26090 O�HFR NON-MOTIVE EOUI7ME 10101 60 KW GENERATOR 30,000 10101 PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE 10.000 10601 VENTURI ACK CLEANROOT CUTTER 15.000 10601 ,QUICK CN BACKH NOZZLE 5,500 10601 HIGHK COUPLING BACKMOE ATTACHMENT 5,500 10601 ,HIGH PRESSUREPUMPE HOSE 00,000 _ 10601 �4'TRASH PUMP 30,000 —_ 1050/ NEW RADIOS -— 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10501 TOW ALONG CEMENT MIXER _ 9,003 9,000 9.000 , 10601 PERMANENT FLOW MONITORS '94,500 10801 PORTABLE TELESCOPIC INSPECTION CAMERA 20,000 10801 LATERAL CAMERA 10,000 10801 PAN B TILT CAMERA WITH TRANSPORTER 35.000 11101 STAND ALONE IC ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENET 35000 11701 SERVER UPGRADE 30000 11201 FLOW METER REPLACEMENTS/SAMPLER REPLACEMENT 10000 10000 11201 DIG LEVEL SENSORS 10000 12201 52540022 PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE - _ 150,000 12201 CRANE _ _ _ 140000 12201 LASER ALIGNMENT AND VIBRATION EQUIPMENT 40,000 10201 STATIONARY SAMPLERWIENCLOSURE 10000 10,000 12201 INTERCEPTOR REDOX PROBES 10.000 • 12201 PRESSURE WASHER WITH HEAT FOR HEAVY EQUIPMENT 7.000 , 12201 SAMPLER ENCLOSURE _ 5,000 12401 AUTO SAMPLERS 10000 10300 12401 VARIOUS NON-MOTIVE EQUIPMENT 150000 150000 150000 150000 426 500 388100 169000 100 000 160.000 150.0001 0 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY _ ._ 2431000 2.288100 1 739 003, 1452000 1742000 1184 OM Q G RAN D TOTAL 20,161,956 34,51191100 17,159,210 4,782,000 9,342,000 4,014.000 84,423,669 v r 111114•1 11111 - - MO 11111 g a - - 1111 1111 M 11111 M 111. STORMWATER UTILITY I ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2012-2014 ill Rate increase: S0.25 per E4uivilent Residential Unit Rate Increase 0% Rate increase 0% AMENDED PROJECTED PROPOSED FORECAST FORECAST I ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET SOURCES 2009-2010 2010-11 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 REVENUES I METERED SALES $ 6,220,499 $ 7,600,000 $ 7,600,000 $ 8,050,000 S 8,050,000 S 8,050,000 INTEREST INCOME 55,842 100,000 100,000 1UU,000 100,000 100,000 OTHER REVENUES 19,117 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 ITOTAL REVENUES $ 6,295,458 $ 7,701,000 $ 7,701,000 >t es-is-Law $ 8.151.000 $ 8,151,000 OTHER SOURCES GRANTS&OTHER RELATED REVENUES 1,707,511 516,000 516,000 516,000 516,000 516,000 COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL• - - - - -IMPACT FEES 384,762 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 IBOND PROCEEDS - - - 8,000,000 - - TOTAL OTHER SOURCES 2,092,273 716,000 716,000 8,716,000 716,000 716,000 rTOTAL SOURCES $ 8,387,731 $ 8,417,000 $ 8,417,000 5 16,867,000 $ 8,867,000 $ 8,867,000 EXPENSES 8 OTHER USES EXPENDITURES PERSONAL SERVICES $ 1,718,653 $ 1,851,044 $ 1,851,044 $ 1.956,611 $ 1,976,178 $ 1,995,939 OPERATING&MAINTENANCE 73,267 112,703 112,700 115,150 117,453 119,798 TRAVEL&TRAINING 5,282 8,480 8,480 8,980 9,160 9,342 UTILITIES 85,472 77,285 77,285 77,285 78,831 80,407 PROF&CONTRACT SERVICES 800,490 803,879 803,879 529,250 539,835 550,632 PUBLIC SERVICES STREET SWEEPING 236,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 244,800 249,696 I DATA PROCESSING 173,728 160,000 160,000 160,000 163,200 166,464 FLEET MAINTENANCE 226,773 206,000 206,000 272,000 210,120 214,323 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FEE 111,097 65,700 65,700 65,700 67,014 68,354 PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES 90,122 115,000 115,000 115,000 117,300 119,646 I RISK MANAGEMENT 105,209 80,000 60,000 80,000 81,600 83,232 TRANSFERS TO GENERAL FUND 177,274 386,274 386,274 401,903 409,941 418,140 OTHER CHARGES AND SERVICES (77,261) (1,245) (1,245) 10,405 10,614 10,824 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,726,106 4,105,117 4,105,117 4,032,284 4,026,046 4,086,797 F OTHER USES CAPITAL OUTLAY 8,815 585,500 585,500 589,000 370,000 430,000 I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET 4,796,327 9,175,500 8,468,196 12,697,000 2,711,000 2,250,000 DEBT SERVICES 581,434 600,000 600,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 TOTAL OTHER USES $ 5,386,576 $ 10,361,000 $ 9,653,696 $ 14,682,000 $ 4,481,000 $ 4,080,000 TOTAL USES $ 9,112,682 $ 14,466,117 $ 13,758,813 $ 18,714,284 $ 8,507,046 $ 8,166,797 ' EXCESS REVENUE AND OTHER SOURCES OVER(UNDER)USES I$ (724,951) $ (6,049,117) $ (5,341,813) $ (1,847,284) $ 359,954 $ 700,203 OPERATING CASH BALANCES IF BEGINNING JULY 1 $10,357,387 $ 9,632,436 $ 9,632,436 S 4,290,623 $ 2,443,339 $ 2,803,293 ENDING JUNE 30 $ 9,632,436 $ 3,583,319 $ 4,290,623 $ 2,443,339 $ 2,803,293 $ 3,503,496 Cash Reserve Ratio 259% 87% 105% 61% 70% 86% I___ CooS reserve pal above 10% 72 STORMWATER UTILITY CASH FLOW ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR 2009.2010 2010-2011 2011.2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 STORMWATER CHARGES _ 6,220,499 7,600.000 8,050,000 8,050,000 8,050.000 8,050.0001 8,050,000 OTHER INCOME 19,117 1 000 1,000 __ 1,000 1 000 1,000 1,000 INTEREST INCOME 55,842 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 OPERATING INCOME 6,295,458 7,701.000 8.151,000 81�51,000 8,151,000 8,151,000 8,151,000 OPERATING EXPENDITURES (3,726,106), (4,105,117) (4.032,284) (4,026,046) (4,086,797) (4.148,576) (4.211.388) NET INCOME EXCLUDING DEP. 2,569,352 3,595 883 4,118,716 4124,954 4,064,203 4,002,424 3,939,612 IMPACT FEES 384,762 _ 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 OTHER RECEIPTS/BOND PROCEEDS 0 8,000,000 OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS 1,707,511 516,000 516,000 516,000 516,000 516,000 518 000 CAPITAL OUTLAY (8,815) (585,500) (589,000) (370,000) (430,000) (565,000) (161,000) DEBT SERVICE(NEW) 0 (800,000) (800,000)__ (800,000) (800,000) (800,00� DEBT SERVICE (581,434) (600,000) (600.000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) OTHER INCOME&EXPENSE _ 1,502,024. (469.500) 6,727,000 (1.054.000) (1,114,000)T (1,249.000). (845,000) AVAILABLE FOR CAPITAL 4,071,376 3,126,383 10,845,716 3,070,954 2,950,203 2,753,424 3,094,612 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS (4,796,327) (8,468,196) (12,693.000) (2,711,000) (2,250,000) (2,200,000) (950,000) CASH INCREASEI(DECREASE) (724 951) (5.341.813) (1,847,284) 359,954 700,203 553,424 2.144,612 BEGINING CASH BALANCE 10.357 387 9,632 436 4,290,623 2.443.339 2,803.293 3.503 496 4,056,920 CASH INCREASEI(DECREASE) (724 951) (5,341.813) (1,847,284) 359.954 700,203 553,424 2,144,612 ENDING BALANCES 9,632,436 "4,290,623 2,443,339 2,803,293 3,503,496 4,056,920 6,201,532 DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE 4.42 5.99 2.94 2.95_ _ - 2.90 2.86 _ 2.81 RATE CHANGE 17% 5.90% 0.00% 0.00%- __ 0.00%' 0.00% _ 0.00% ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL STORM WATER BILL _ BILL(1991438.00) 648.00 i50.88 $50.88 $50.88 _ O50.85 _ $50.88 $50.88 Cash Reserve Rags 258.51% 104.52% 60.59% 69.63% 85.73% 97.79% 147.28% v CO - 111111010. MI OM - e ON N a LAI s me on no mg me am am I Department Of('uh(tc(Plates STORM DRAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY 2011-12 COST PROJECT FISCAL YR 4 CENTER NUMBERS DESCRIPTION 2011-2012 I53-10201_ 2772.10 LAND _ 0 I 53.10301 ;772.10 LIFT STATIONS-2720,05 10301 5348002 VARIOUS PUMP STATIONS 100,000 10301 500 SOUTH AND SURPLUS CANAL LIFT STATION 300,000 10301 VALVE ON 200 SOUTH LIFT STATION OUTLET BOX 10,000 I 410,000 2773.1 =UILDINGS.MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SHOPS 2720.1Q 111 _53-10301_ 2773.10 DETENTION BASINS-2730.20 _ ' _53-10301 2773.10 COLLECTION MAINS-2730.12 1030T YALECREST AVENUE(1080 S)-1500 EAST TO 1700 EAST(MONEY MOVED)CED 580,000 10301• 5347848 500f700 SOUTH REHAB-SURPLUS CANAL TO GLADIOLA STREET(3400 W) 350,000 ' 10301 534700625 OIL DRAIN PROJECT 500,000 t o301 53470731 500 EAST-1300 SOUTH TO 2100 SOUTH 400,000 10301 1300 EAST-SOUTH TEMPLE TO 500 SOUTH _ 250,000 10301 800 EAST STORM DRAIN-2700 SOUTH TO STRAFFORD AVENUE 113,000 I 10301 LITTLE GOGGIN DRAIN BONNEVILLE CENTER C&D _ 65,000 10301 MIDDLE BRIGHTON CULVERT REHABILITATION 150,000 10301 53475005 BRIGHTON DRAIN WIDENING FOR SORENSON 266,000 10301 CLEANOUT BOX REHABILITATION(LIDS) 60,000 MI 'UJU1 TESORO(1200 NORTH-800 WEST TO 850 WEST) 240.000 2,974,000 I RIPARIAN C�QBRIDOR PROJECTS 10301 RED BUTTE CULVERT AT 1300 EAST&1000 SOUTH-REHAB 250,000 10301 RED BUTTE CULVERT AT SUNNYSIDEAVENUE-REHAB 300,000 10301 EMIGRATION CREEK REHABILITATOIN-REACH LEM RO3A 115,000 _ 10301 EMIGRATION CREEK REHABILITATION-REACH LEM RO3B 135,000 10301 EMIGRATION CREEK REHABILITATION-REACH LEM R04 4a,uuu 10301 EMIGRATION CREEK REHABILITATION-REACH LEM R05A AND REM 05B 115,000 959,000 LOCAL AREA PRO)ECTSI•WORK BY CITY CREWS) 10301 I 534740016 VARIOUS PROJECTS 200,000 I200,000 10301. AVENUE UKUSSWALKS 50,000 10301 ADA RAMPS 50,000 I 10301' 10301 SID VARIOUS STREETS—DIP STONE REPLACEMENT 50,000 • CONTRIBUTIONS BY DEVELOPERS 500,000 650,000 MASTER PLAN PROJECTS 1oeo1 FOLSOM STORM DRAIN 7,500,000 TOTAL COLLECTION LINES 12,283,000 IP TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 12,693,000 o we Replacement Auto&Truck 10201; ill10 WHEEL DUMP TRUCK 120,000 74 Oep,,ri„•m of'r,h/a•I Mines STORM DRAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY 2011-12 COST PROJECT FISCAL' i CENTER NUMBERS DESCRIPTION 2011-20,_ 10201 BOBTAIL DUMP-2 1/2 TON(REPLACE 36830)_ 148,00, - 10201 1 TON HD TRUCK W/UTILITY BED 40,001 -- 10201 1 TON DUMP(REPLACE 36810) 40,000 — 10701 1/2 TON PICKUP EXT CAB WITH SHELL-HYBRID 40,000I 388,001 2750.3Q.Field Maint Eauioment - 10201 BACKHOE-REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 9.00X 10201 BACKHOE 4X4(REPLACE 3645-JD710) 125,0001 134,00r 2760.3Q Telemeterinq 10201. SCADA FOR LIFT STATIONS 25.00' 2780.50 Office Eauioment • 2760.90 Other Eauioment 102011 CEMENT MIXER 6,00( 10201 CONCRETE SAW-WALK BEHIND _ 8,00I 10201 REPLACEMENT RADIOS 5,0001 10201 TRUCK MOUNTED WELDER 13,r^^ 10 COMPOSITE SAMPLERS 10, 42,000 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 589,0001 • • GRAND TOTAL 13,282,00( I 75 STORM DRAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIX YEAR BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 12 BUDGET `...'— GROWTH PRIORITY OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR '•` ll 1111 V. RATING 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2016-18 u! LAND RIGHT OF WAY ; i. 0 _ 0 0 0 0' 0 1110301 2772-101LFT STATIONS 7312,01. 10301 5348002 VARIOUS PUMP STATIONS 1 OC J00 100003 103,00D 100 100000 10301 '400 SOUTH LIFT STATION-NORTH 10301 SOR!!ELL LIFT STATION PUMP REPLACEMENT WAW 10301 rWE TPOINT PARK UNDERORAIN UFT STATION REHABILITATION 100000 10301 NEW STAR UFT STATION REHABILITATION 50WY 50,1w 10301 53471035 500 SOUTH AND SURPLUS CANAL LIFT STATION 300,000 _10301 'VALVE ON 200 SOUTH LIFT STATION OUTLET BOX 10.000 240000 410.000 100000 150.000 850000 100000 0 2773.1 BABLEDIIDILMAINTENANCE MD REPAIR SHOPS 272010 03,10300 2773101DETENTTON BASINS-273020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53-1030j�27]3 10 COLLECTION MAINS-2T20.12 03 53C708487 YA,700 T REHAB 110S0 S)-1510 EAST TO 1700 EAST(MONEY MOVED)CEO 350.000 10351 5347848 OIL DRAIN 0 SOUTH REHAB-SURPLUS CANAL TO GLADIOLA STREET(3100 W) 300000 350.000 10301 53470 625 OIL PROJECT 500 000 500000 10301 MILITARY DRIVE70016S0 TOLECR STREETNUE(1015 SI IU,WD - --- - - ---- 10301 53470831 40 SOUTH- EAST TO WINDSOR (SW E) Iu,OW 10301. _53470855 400E WEST 700 SOUTH 1tltl.WU — 10301' 53470855 900SOUTH 500 EAST TOTO210AST 010000 10301- 53470731 500 EAST-1300 SOUTH 2100 SOUTH 200,000 400000 1030t 53470731 1300 EAST-SOUTH TEMPLE TO 500 SOUTH 250000 10301 53470850 800 EAST STORM DRAIN-2700 SOUTH TO STRAFFORD AVENUE 113,000 103M1 53470851 LITTLE GOGGIN DRAIN BONNEVILLE CENTER C80 85,000 10301 _53470852 MIDDLE BRIGHTON CULVERT REHABILITATION 150.000 10351 53470853 GLADIOLA STORM DRAIN-500 SOUTH TO RAILROAD CROSSING 5WAlU 10301 53470856 GLADIOLA STORM DRAIN-RAILROAD CROSSING 900 SOUTH - 450000 — 10301- 53470857 GLADIOLA STORM DRAIN-930 SOUTH TO 1300 SOUTH 1W,000' — 10301 53470858 DELONG STREET STORM DRAIN 0o0000 — 10301 53470859 RICHMOND STREET STORM DRAIN 1WAW - 10301 53475005 BRIGHTON DRAIN WIDENING FOR SORENSON 280,000 208,000 200.000 10301 534750007 LEE DRAIN PIPE IMPROVEMENT UNDER BANGERTER(OR RAILROAD ONLY) 385000 500,000 — 10301 53470/337 4TH AVENUE STEPS STORM DRAIN BORING 29,531 10301. 53470842 STORM DRAIN REPAIR AT MAIN STREET AND SOUTH TEMPLE 17,655 SOOT 53470854 CLEANOUT BOX REHABILITATION(LIDS) 60.000 —,0301 53470723 TESORO(1200 NORTH-800 WEST TO 850 WEST) 240 000 2126196 2 074 000 1.376003 1250000 505.000 0 Q ----T5301 EMIGRATION CULVERT AT 1500 EAST 10301 53470850 RED BUTTE CULVERT AT 1300 EAST 81000 SOUTH-REHAB 250,000 10301_53470851 RED BUTTE CULVERT AT SUNNYSIDE AVENUE-REHAB 303,000 10301 53470558 EMIGRATION CREEK AT 1300 EAST-CULVERT-REHAB 385,000 _ RED BUTTE CULVERT REHAB AT 1500 EAST(CIPP 21101W IO]01 53470852 EMIGRATION CREEK REHABIUTATIIN-REACH LEN R03A 115.0W 10301 53470855 EMIGRATION CREEK REHABILITATION-REACH LEM R0313 130,1X3.1 10301 53470858 EMIGRATION CREEK REI4ABIUTATION-REACH LEM R04 44.1140 10301 53470857 EMIGRATION CREEK REHABILITATION-REACH LEM RO5A AND REM 0513 11501.3.1 200.000 959,000 396000 0 0 0 0 I ILOCALAREAPROJECTS l'WORK BY CITY CREWSI r 10301 534740016 VARIOUS PROJECTS 200000 200000 200000 200030 200 Q62 200 000 A _ 700 000 200000 200.002 200100 200000 200000 Q —Tow' AVENUE L�HUSSWALR 50,000 50,000 50.000 50,000 00.033 50,000 DTI ADA RAMPS - 50,000 50,000_ 50.000 50,000 50,000 50000 SID VARIOUS STREETS-DIP STONE REPLACEMENT 50000 50.000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1 ;CONTRIBUTIONS BY DEVELOPERS 1 000 000 500000 500000 500000 500000 1 150 000 850000 650003 BOO 000 550 000 650000 0 STORM DRAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SIR YEAR BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 BUDGET IIIIMMIIIIIMK GROWTH PRIORITY FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR PROJ[L I S A RATING PIPE 2010.2011 2011.2012 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2016.16 U[LAT[U IIM1111PIAN 1218CT8 53470784 NORTH TEMPLE VIADUCT DIVERSION PROJECT IRpAtl FOB 9 1 4900900 tow GATSBY DIVERSION 3 500000 10091 53470823 FOLSOM STORM DRAIN-CITY CREEK BYPASS-800 WEST TO THE JORDAN RIVER BOND 2011 1 500,000 7.503,000 10101, FOOTHILL DRIVE(28MO)-EMIGRATION CREEK TO 2300 EAST _ 3 500000 93301 _ 600 EAST-900 SOUTH TO THE AVENUES 3 _ _ 4,200,000 W 101 1700 SOUTH 500 WEST 3 400000 TOTAL COLLECTION LINES 8.178,186 12,283,000 3.611,000 2100,000 1,350,000 650,000 6.600,000 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS • 0468+96 12 693 000 2711000 2250_000 2200 COO 950.000 5_800000 2759.10 1 TON YD TRUCK IDU 8 TnA* 10201 1 TON EE TRUCPTRUCMP 38,000 10201 10 WHEEL DUMP 2 12 140.000 1N•UW 10201 BOBTAIL DUMP-2 12 TON(REPLACE 38830) 149000 05,000 10201 2 TON DUMP 4TRUCK 85,000 05,000 10201 1 T PICKUP RU4 _ _ _ 85,000 10201 1 TON DU1.11TRUCK L.NCE f8 BED 40,000 38,000 10201 1 TON NUMP(REPLACE 3BWIT 40.000 10701 --- _C9 TON PICKUP 4O4EXT CAB WITHSMELL-MYBRIO -- 40.000 10701 --- ----CANYON PU 4%4 EM CAB 21,500 151 500 388000 70000 155000 120 COO 0 0 2750.30 939 M6M EUYMIM01 10201 BACKHOE-REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 0.000 9,000 9,000 9.000 150000 0 10201 VACTOR TRUCK - 275,000 275,000 UOSISBI 10201 TRACK EXCATORWIDOZER BLADE 130003 mom 10201 BACKHOE 4X4(REPLACE 3845-JD710) 125,000 10201 DRAG MACHINE 80000 284000 134030 284.003 219900 4100, 150000 0 27B0.30'ITYNIIeb 9M 50A 10201 SCADA FOR LIFT STATgNS 25,000 25.000 5.000- 5.000 5,000 25000 25.000 5000 5000 5903 5000 q . 2ID0.50I2'02LEa6omN6 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 2780.90 10201 (CEMENT MIXER 8.000 8,000 W. 10201 CONCRETE SAW-WALK BEHIND 8,000 , 10201 'REPLACEMENT RADIOS 5,000 5,000 5,033 5.000 5000, 10201 4-PUMP 30000 10201 TRUCK MOUNTED WELDER - 13,000 - 10201 24-HIGH CAPACITY PUMP&POWER UNIT 120000 _ 10701 ICOMPOSRE SAMPLERS 10,000 10,000 125000 42000 5.000 51000 8.080 8000 0 1 r r TOTAL CAPITALOUTIAY , 585500 589.000 370000 430000 585000 181.000 0 GRAND TOTAL 9 053 89 13282.0001 3 081 000 2 N00001 2 785 000 1111.000 5 800 000 aOM 11111 - S - • Item A . 7 please see Item A . 9 from 4 . 5 . 2011 Agenda