Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
04/02/2002 - Minutes (2)
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 2 , 2002 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in a Work Session Room on Tuesday, April 2, 2002 at 5:30 p.m. in Room 326, City Council Office, City County Building, 451 South State Street. In Attendance: Council Members C. Christensen, Van Turner, Eric Jergensen, Nancy Saxton, Jill Love, Dave Buhler and Dale Lambert. Also in Attendance: Mayor Ross C. "Rocky", Anderson; Rocky Fluhart, Chief Administrative Officer; Jay Magure, Mayor's Chief of Staff; Archie Archuleta, Administrative Assistant for Minority & Community Affairs; Gary Mumford, Council Deputy Director/Senior Legislative Auditor; Michael Sears, Council Budget & Policy Analyst; Steven Allred, Deputy City Attorney; Rick Graham, Director of Public Services; Steve Fawcett, Management Services Deputy Director; Mac Cannole, Police Executive Administrative Assistant Chief; Max Peterson, City Engineer; Joseph Moratalla, Airport Contract Payments; David Dobbins, Acting Director of Community and Economic Development (CED) ; Stephen Goldsmith, Planning Director; LuAnn Clark, Deputy Director of Housing and Neighborhood Development (HAND) ; Sandi Marler, Community Development Program Specialist; Karen Wiley, Grant Financial Administrator; and Chris Meeker, Chief Deputy Recorder. Council Chair Buhler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 5:39 p.m. #1. REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INCLUDING REVIEW OF COUNCIL INFORMATION ITEMS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. See File M 02-5 for announcements. #2. RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD. View Attachment Mayor Anderson, Gary Mumford and Jay Magure briefed the Council. Councilmember Buhler referred to the staff report and a copy of the proposed ordinance. He asked if current board members would continue or if new members would be appointed. Mr. Magure said new members would be appointed. He said cross over of current members could occur. Councilmember Buhler asked if the intention was that the board be independent. Mr. Magure said that was correct. He said the two-year member appointment was due to the large time demand and the reasonable expectation of a civilian to donate time. He said the potential was for an active board and a boardmember might stand for two terms or four years total. He said the Civilian Review Board (CRB) was community oriented and continuous change would bring more community investment to the board. Councilmember Buhler asked if the ordinance had a provision for boardmember terms to be staggered. Mayor Anderson said 2.72.030 C, Term of Office, in the proposed ordinance provided for staggering terms. Mr. Magure said the board would consist of 14 members with 5 members assigned to review committees for each case. He said the concern was freshness and potential burnout of board members. Councilmember Saxton suggested that a 3-year term would help board members experience. Councilmember Buhler asked how the board would determine to accept or deny a complaint against the Police Department. Mr. Magure said first someone with a complaint would file with the Police Department and then there was 96 hours in which to file the complaint with the Civilian Review Board. He said the board would create criteria for acceptance or denial of a complaint. Mayor Anderson said every excessive force complaint would come before the CRB. 02 - 1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 2 , 2002 Councilmember Buhler said he was concerned with the proposed ordinance placing restrictions on the investigator position that were not placed on board members. Mayor Anderson said anyone with felony convictions or pending indictments for information would not be allowed on the CRB. Councilmember Buhler said he was concerned with the confidentiality requirement for the investigator and not for board members. He referred to Page 11 of the proposed ordinance and asked that the ordinance reflect the same requirement for board members. Mayor Anderson said the confidentiality requirement for board members fell under Section 52-4-5 Utah Code Annotated, (Open Meetings Act requirements) . He said the CRB could close a meeting when confidentiality or mental health privacy rights were involved. He referred to Page 8 of the proposed ordinance. Councilmember Buhler asked what were the biggest changes. that the proposed ordinance made. Mr. Magure said currently the board could only review trends not individual cases. He said the proposed ordinance allowed review of individual cases simultaneously with an internal affairs investigation. He said the proposed ordinance also called for an independent board investigator. Councilmember Buhler referred to 2.72.060 Independent Board Investigator, of the proposed ordinance. He said the proposed ordinance did not express that the investigator have experience conducting investigations. Mayor Anderson said investigation experience could be part of the desired qualifications. Councilmember Buhler said investigation experience should be mandatory. Councilmember Buhler asked if the investigator position was an at-will position to be hired and fired by the Mayor. Mr. Magure said the position needed to be independent and responsive to the community more than a merit employee might be. Mayor Anderson referred to 2.72.060A, Appointment/Removal, the last sentence. He said the conclusion was that the investigator could be removed for cause prior to normal expiration. Councilmember Buhler recommended that the CRB and the Mayor concur on removal of the investigator. Councilmember Buhler asked where funding for the investigator position would come from. Mr. Magure said funding would be in a budget opening scheduled for May of 2002 and support staff would be integrated from existing Management Service staff. Councilmember Saxton said the goal was to increase the trust of the public so the structure needed to be oriented toward trust. Mayor Anderson said another goal was to provide discriminatory security for police officers under discipline. Councilmember Saxton asked for a real cost for the investigator position, including staff time, paper, office space etc. She asked if information collection would be private. Mr. Magure said that was correct. He said opened and closed meetings would be needed depending on the issue. Councilmember Turner said he was concerned with the length of terms for the CRB. He said longer terms would give board members better training. He said he supported 3 year staggered terms. A discussion was held regarding how active the board could be and what issues would be reviewed. Councilmember Buhler asked the Administration to provide the number of excessive force cases and internal investigation cases the City had in 2001. A discussion was held regarding how busy the investigator position would be vs. the pay scale. Councilmember Love asked if the investigator would report to the Mayor. Mr. Magure said that was correct. Councilmember Love asked why the Mayor would issue subpoenas and not the CRB. Mayor Anderson said State Code required the Mayor to issue subpoenas. 02 - 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 2 , 2002 Councilmember Lambert said he supported a 3-year term. He said he was concerned with the investigator acting independently. He said he was concerned with a heavy caseload for the investigator and the CRB. He said he wondered how workable 14 members would be. Mayor Anderson said a larger number allowed diversity on the board. Councilmember Christensen said he agreed with a 3-year term and that investigative experience should be listed under desired qualifications. He asked the Mayor if a model for the CRB had been used in other cities. Mayor Anderson said the best elements of several models had been used. He said the advisory position was a new idea. He said this position would have police experience. He said the provision regarding frivolous claims was also new. Councilmember Lambert said he agreed investigative experience should be highly desired. Councilmember Saxton said that investigative experience should be a guideline and not listed under desired qualifications. Councilmember Buhler referred to Page 14 of the proposed ordinance regarding keeping unfounded reports. He said he was concerned this information could be used against an officer. Mr. Magure said a record of the case being investigated would be kept for credibility to the public. Mayor Anderson referred to Page 22, of the proposed ordinance, Early Warning System. He said data tracking for complaints would be kept for early warning and prevention. Mr. Magure said the CRB term of office would be changed to 3 years, the inspector position would include having strong investigative skills, and the confidentiality requirements for the CRB and the inspector would be changed to be the same. #3. HOLD A DISCUSSION REGARDING CDBG, ESG, HOPWA, AND HOME PROGRAMS. View Attachment Councilmember Buhler said the request was for Council Members to receive an over- view to look at various requests for funding and recommendations. He said no decisions would be made until the public hearing. Michael Sears and LuAnn Clark briefed the Council. Ms. Clark referred to a letter from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) . She said HUD was now enforcing a 1.5 balance in the line-of-credit. She said funding could be taken if the City did not meet the 1.5 rule. Ms. Clark said the citizens group had changed from Housing Advisory and Appeals Board (HAAB) to the Housing Trust Fund Board (HTFB) with regard to making decisions on HOME funding. Mr. Sears said new census information would be published. He said it would take until the years 2003 and 2004 before any changes could be seen in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) areas. He said this information would not impact decisions made now. A discussion was held regarding census information. Mr. Sears referred to the HOME section of the Mayor's recommended budget booklet. He reviewed organizations and requested amounts. Councilmember Lambert asked if organizations reported how they used funding. Ms. Clark said all organizations receiving funding were monitored yearly and were required to give quarterly reports. She said no funds were released unless the organization followed the plan they had submitted when requesting funding. She said funding was done on a reimbursement basis. 02 - 3 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, APRIL 2 , 2002 Councilmember Christensen asked if organizations were monitored for effectiveness. Ms. Clark said effectiveness was subjective. She said as an example one of the organizations had a property but due to the market the property had not been developed. She said each organization did something different so comparison was difficult. She said measurements could be tried. Councilmember Saxton suggested asking the organizations how efficiently they were run. Councilmember Lambert asked if any of the funding was used internally for administrative fees. Ms. Clark said some were but most HOME money was not. She said HOME was project based. She said many of the CBDG' s were used for administrative fees. A discussion was held regarding Neighborhood Housing Services and the Family Support Center in Midvale. Ms. Clark explained the Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) grant. A discussion was held regarding homeowner rehabilitation financial service loans. Mr. Sears referred to the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) section of the Mayor's recommended budget booklet. He reviewed organizations and requested amounts. Ms. Clark explained that the entitlement group consisted of Weber, Davis and Salt Lake County. She said Salt Lake City was the participating jurisdiction so funding was given to Salt Lake City. She said the funding was for all three locations. Mr. Sears referred to the Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) section of the Mayor's recommended budget booklet. He reviewed organizations and requested amounts. Councilmember Lambert requested information from the Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) concerning recommendations they had made and recommendations the Mayor had made. He said he was interested in the recommendation differences. Councilmember Buhler said he would be interested in having the Chair of CDAC give the Council their perspective with regard to funding. #4. CONSIDER ENTERING INTO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION, IN KEEPING WITH UTAH CODE, TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS. Executive Session was held. See File M 02-2 for confidential tape and Sworn Statement. #5. CONSIDER ENTERING INTO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION, IN KEEPING WITH UTAH CODE, TO DISCUSS PENDING LITIGATION. Executive Session was held. See File M 02-2 for confidential tape and Sworn Statement. The meeting adjourned at 9:22 p.m. cm 02 - 4 2 Ctifile/‘ 21- 44 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: March 29,2002 SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO POLICE CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT BY: Gary Mumford Document Type Budget-Related Facts Policy-Related Facts Miscellaneous Facts Ordinance New investigator One of the goals of the The proposal includes position is proposed proposed amendment is concurrent investigations at an annual cost of to establish and maintain with Internal Affairs so that approximately$79,000. the Police Department's the Police Chief will have reputation and practice recommendations from both for fairness and firmness Internal Affairs and the in addressing allegations Civilian Review Board when of police misconduct. making decisions concerning discipline. The Administration is proposing that the existing Civilian Review Board ordinance be repealed and replaced with a new ordinance to provide an enhanced method of allowing individuals an effective way to address complaints concerning the Police Department. The current ordinance (that is proposed to be repealed) provides that the Civilian Review Board evaluates trends in complaints of police officer misconduct,but it does not allow the Board to make recommendations regarding specific cases. The Administration indicated that members of the community have complained about the ineffectiveness of the review process. The proposed ordinance allows the Civilian Review Board to make recommendations regarding individual cases and officers. The Administration obtained input regarding the proposed ordinance from individual community members, community groups, and from the Salt Lake Police Association. KEY ELEMENTS The following are some of the key changes proposed to the Police Civilian Review Board Ordinance: • Expand recommendations to not only overall police performance or trends (current ordinance) but also to individual cases and officers. • Create a full-time investigator position. • Provide for concurrent investigations in which the Board's investigator would join with Internal Affairs during the interview process. Under the new ordinance, the Board will forward a report to the Police Chief so that the Chief will have recommendations of both Internal Affairs and the Civilian Review Board when making decisions concerning discipline. • Increase the number of board members from 7 to 14. • Change the term of board members from 4 years to 2 years. • Expand the training curriculum for new Board members. ['ago I • Add the appointment of a citizen to be a Board Advisor. This person is to have prior police experience but would not be a voting member of the Board. • Create a concept of board panels wherein a separate panel of five board members is to be appointed to address each case. • Provide for criminal penalties and civil liability for knowingly filing false complaints. - • Establish an early warning system designed to identify police officer problem behavior in its initial manifestations. OPTIONS: The Council may wish to consider the following options: 1. Approve the ordinance and approve the investigator position in a subsequent budget opening. 2. Request additional information or hold additional work-session discussions. 3. Establish a Council subcommittee to review the proposal in more detail. 4. Hold a public hearing to determine the degree to which there are concerns or acceptance within the community of the proposed ordinance. 5. Defer funding of the investigator position until after the first week in May when the Administration will propose a revised balanced budget for fiscal year 2002-2003. ANALYSIS: Cases in which it is claimed that a police officer used excessive force-The proposed ordinance provides that the Civilian Review Board will audit and review all cases in which it is claimed that a police officer used excessive force. The investigator will become a participant with Internal Affairs in interviewing witnesses and reviewing other information. .The Board will appoint a five- member panel to review the findings of the investigator and prepare a report for the Police Chief with a copy to the entire Board. If the panel does not agree,it can also submit a minority report. The Board is to create a new panel for each case. Full-time investigator position-The investigator is to be an at-will employee operating out of the City's Department of Management Services. This person is to have experience in public sector labor and employment law, Utah civil service law, and civil rights law. The investigator will perform the review concurrently with the Internal Affairs investigation, and the investigator will be able to participate in the Internal Affairs interviewing sessions. After completion of the review, the investigator will forward recommendations to a Board panel. The Board panel will forward a report to the Police Chief and to the full Board. The intent is that the Police Chief has the recommendations of the Civilian Review Board as well as Internal Affairs when making decisions concerning discipline. The Chief makes the final decision. The Council may wish to inquire whether the Administration has identified an ongoing funding source for the investigator position. Cases filed with the Board within four days-A person who files a complaint with the Police Department will be informed that the person can also file the complaint with the Civilian Review Board within four days. The Board has the option of accepting or not accepting the complaint. This decision is to be made promptly so that the investigator can participate with the review made by Internal Affairs. The Council may wish to inquire as to how the 14-members of the Board will be polled each time a complaint is filed in order to make a timely decision as to whether to investigate or deny the complaint. Page 2 Cases in which the person making a complaint is dissatisfied with the decision of the Police Chief- The investigator into make a review of a case when a person (other than the police officer)is dissatisfied with the decision of the Police Chief regarding a complaint. This review is to be made by reviewing records of the Police Department regarding the incident but without questioning witnesses. A panel is appointed to review the investigator's findings and to prepare a report to the Police Chief and to the entire Board. If the panel wishes,it may request that the Police Department reopen the case. The Police Chief is to determine whether or not to reopen the case. The proposed ordinance states that the Board may adopt rules that allow it to dismiss any claim that it deems frivolous, malicious or false. Since the Board is required to hold a meeting only once every three months, the Council may wish to inquire as to how the Board will make a decision as to whether to investigate a case where the petitioner is dissatisfied and how the panel will be chosen so as to timely respond to the request. Term of board members to change from 4 years to 2 years-The Administration proposes that the term of board members will be only 2 years to mitigate the time commitment for each board member and to allow more members of the community to participation. A member cannot serve more than two consecutive full terms. The board will meet at least once every three months, and panels meet as necessary to review cases. An expanded training curriculum over a period not to exceed three months is proposed including: (1) a specific training course.as determined by the Police Chief and the Mayor, (2)eight hours of training by the Internal Affairs Division, and(3) four three-hour ride-alongs (one in each of the four police sectors). This training must be completed before a board member can actively participate on the board. Council Members may wish to discuss with the Administration the appropriateness of a 2-year term in view of the extensive training that will be provided. Board Advisor-The Mayor is to appoint a Board Advisor, a person with prior police experience, who is not employed at the current time by any law enforcement agency, to provide advice to the Board. The Board Advisor is to serve no more than two 2-year terms. Requesting subpoenas- If the Investigator desires to interview a witness or a police officer, and if such person declines to be interviewed, the Investigator may ask the Mayor to compel the witness or police office to meet with and be interviewed by the Investigator. An Internal Affairs Unit investigator is to be present or invited to be present when the Board Investigator has any contact with a witness or accused employee. Semiannual Trend Report- Every six months the Board is to prepare an advisory report highlighting the trends in police performance and giving recommendations regarding training needs or changes in police policy and procedures. Early warning system- If a police officer has exhibited a pattern of generating complaints, the Chief of Police is to make a review and where appropriate is to require the officer to receive counseling, testing, or training. The Police Department is to document the pattern of behavior of the police officer, the review by the Chief of Police, and the assigned counseling, testing, or training. Page 3 CHRONOLOGY: February 1993-Salt Lake City implemented a police review board that included citizen participation(2 citizens and 3 police offices). 1995-A third citizen was added to the board. Summer 1996-A Council Member suggested inquiring into the review board process after talking to concerned constituents. October 3, 1996-A special committee was established to evaluate the effectiveness of the review process and propose further improvements. August 5, 1997-The City Council adopted an ordinance providing for a police civilian review board made up entirely of citizens with staff support independent of the Police Department. March 2, 1999-The City Council adopted an amendment to the Civilian Review Board Ordinance that(1)increased the number of board members from five to seven, (2) specified that the City Attorney is the attorney for the Civilian Review Board, (3) specified that closure of meetings be governed by the Open and Public Meetings Act, (4)clarified that police officers can be compelled to attend and testify in meetings of the Board, (5) required that requests for reviews be signed and dated by the person making the request, and (6)clarified that recommendations are limited to matters involving overall police performance or policy concerns. • cc: Rocky Fluhart,Jay Magure,Chief Dinse Page 4 • COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL TO: Rocky J. Fluhart, Chief Administrative Officl 7` P DATE: August 20, 2001 \ i FROM: Jennifer Seeli4 SUBJECT: Amendments to . ' and 2.08 related to the Civilian Review Board and the Police Department. STAFF CONTACT: Jennifer Seelig, 535-7936 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance BUDGET IMPACT: The proposed ordinance creates an Independent Investigator position housed in Management Services. It is estimated that the new FTE would be valued at $79,130. The Office of Internal Audit currently staffs the Civilian Review Board. Approximately 25% of the auditor's work time has been spent staffing this board. This time amounts to .25 of the midpoint Internal Audit FTE value, or$19,500. This function will be discontinued and will offset the cost of the Independent Investigator. The ordinance provides for City staff to record minutes of meetings and type notes. This function was previously handled by the Board Secretary. Due to time demands placed on the volunteer filling this position, as well as the desire to formalize the process so that the minutes are similar to those taken at City Council meetings, it was decided that City staff would best be suited to fulfill this responsibility. DISCUSSION: Salt Lake City first legislatively established a Civilian Review Board in July 1997. The primary role of the Board was to evaluate trends in complaints of police officer misconduct, and administrative policies related to officer misconduct. The Administration has found that the need for civilian oversight is not met by this current process. Board members have expressed their frustration at not being able to impact specific cases and members of the community have complained about the process as well. The proposed changes were made after extensive input from a diverse cross section of individual community members, community groups, and from the Salt Lake Police Association. In addition, open houses were held on February 16, 2001 and June 1 29, 2001 to receive public feedback on the proposal. The proposed changes will offer the Board direct impact on cases of excessive force and other cases as they deem necessary. Civilian oversight of law enforcement manifests itself in a myriad of municipal models, models which meet the individual needs of the community served. The National Institute of Justice organizes civilian review approaches into four different types: Type 1: Citizens investigate allegations of police misconduct and recommend findings to the chief or sheriff. . Type 2: Police officers investigate allegations and develop findings; citizens review and recommend that the chief or sheriff approve or reject the findings. Type 3 Complainants may appeal findings established by the police department to citizens,who review them and then recommend their own findings to the chief or sheriff. Type 4: An auditor investigates the process by which the police or sheriff's department accepts and investigates complaints and reports on the processes thoroughness and fairness. 1 The Administration's proposal is a mixture of all four types previously listed. This combination is consistent with the observation that"no one system works best for everyone. Communities must take responsibility for fashioning a system that fits their local situation and unique needs." 2 The following components are included in the proposed changes: • Board Members (2.72.030)—The number of board members increases from seven to fourteen, and terms decrease from four to two years. This change is to mitigate the time commitment needed for each individual board member and to encourage participation from a variety of community members. • Board Panels (2.72.130, 2.72.180) - The concept of board panels has been added. Panels are composed of 5 randomly chosen board members to address each case. The intent of the panel format is to lessen the time commitment for individual members. • Training (2.72.120)—An expanded training curriculum as well as a requirement to complete training prior to functioning as a member have been added. There is an additional supplemental training course required for members to complete at the Peter Finn, Citizen Review of Police: Approaches and Implementation(Washington D.C.,National Institute of Justice, 2001), 1-6. 2 Finn, iii. 2 beginning of their second year of their term. Education will familiarize Board members with police practices and procedures and as well as with community groups who have an interest in civilian oversight. • Addition of an Investigator (2.72.060) -This is an at-will position. The Mayor is to consider recommendations of the Civilian Review Board prior to hiring and firing. The Mayor, as the person responsible for appointing this position, will be held accountable by voters for the Investigator's job performance. In an at-will position, the Investigator is less likely to become part of the system and more likely to retain an outside view. • Board Advisor(2.72.030)-The Advisor's role is to provide the board with input and advice. The Advisor serves as a volunteer and does not vote. The Advisor is to have prior police experience but is not employed with Salt Lake City Police Department or any other law enforcement agency at the time he or she serves the Civilian Review Board. Through the Advisor, board members will have access to impartial information pertaining to the profession of law enforcement • Scope of review (2.72.010,2.72.150, 2.72.220, 2.72.230)—The current ordinance provides for the Board to quarterly review trends in complaints against law enforcement officers as well as to make recommendations related to training and policy. This type of review will continue, but on a semiannual basis. The current ordinance specifies that cases associated with an officer using deadly or excessive force, vehicular pursuits, violation of the public trust must be reviewed, and the Board may review any additional cases the Board may choose. The proposed ordinance specifies that only excessive force cases must be reviewed, and the Board may review any other type of case the Board chooses. Two additional types of review have been included: 1. The Civilian Review Board will have access to all Internal Affairs investigations in which it is claimed that a police officer uses excessive force, along with any other investigations as the Board in its discretion requests. The Investigator's investigation will be concurrent with the Internal Affairs investigation, and the Investigator will be able to participate in the Internal Affairs interviewing sessions. As such, the evaluation will be not only of the individual case, but also of the process used by the Police Department to address the complaint. After completion of the review, the Investigator will forward his or her recommendations to a Board panel. The Board panel will then forward their report on to the police chief and to the full Board. The intent is that the police chief will have the recommendations of Internal Affairs as well as of the Civilian Review Board when making decisions concerning discipline. The chief makes the final decision. 3 There is an additional mechanism available in which civilian complainants may request concurrent Civilian Review Board review of their case, if the case has not already been chosen by the Board or if it is not excessive force related. The complainant will have 96 hours past the time that he or she filed with Internal Affairs to request that the Civilian Review Board review the case. The Board will have the option of accepting or declining review of these cases. 2. Civilian requested review of a case after the Internal Affairs unit has already investigated it. In this process, the Board's Investigator will have access to Internal Affairs unit files and then will make a determination about the process and disposition. Board panels will issue statements about the investigation to the chief and to the complainant. The Board will review all cases brought to it in this manner. • Communication of case disposition (2.72.200)—This language specifies that reports concerning the cases will contain language that explains the terminology used to describe findings associated with the case. "Unfounded," for example,will be followed with "the reported complaint did not occur." This is to break down any communication barriers between the Police Department and the public,which may be caused by the use of profession- specific language. • Filing false complaints (2.72.230)—If a person were to file a complaint knowing that the complaint is frivolous, malicious, or false, they shall be guilty of a Class C misdemeanor and shall be civilly liable for all costs and expenses incurred in investigating the complaint. A similar provision currently exists in the Conflict of Interest ordinance. • Early warning system (2.08.090)—The Chief of Police will develop an early warning system designed to identify police officer problem behavior in its initial manifestations. This amendment occurs in the section of code related to the Police Department. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. 4 REC'0 SEP I. 4 2001 September 10, 2001 Salt Lake City Council 451 South State Street#304 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re: Proposed Ordinance for the Police Civilian Review Board To Members of the Salt Lake City Council: I am writing on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah to express our support for the proposed changes to the Police Civilian Review Board,which we believe considerably strengthen our existing model for citizen review of police practices. The ACLU has always maintained that effective law enforcement depends upon the trust and cooperation of community residents, and that both are enhanced when citizen review of police activities is possible. We are pleased by the fact that the proposed ordinance contains several elements that are critical to a strong and independent review board, specifically: 1) An investigator who is not an employee of the police department, who has access to all investigations by the police department's internal affairs unit, and who may request additional investigations, question witnesses, and request that internal affairs representatives interview specific witnesses or collect evidence. 2) A civilian review board that is as diverse—geographically, racially, economically, etc. —as the population it represents. 3) The development of an "early warning system" to identify police officers who have generated large numbers of citizen complaints. Also, by granting the investigator access to all internal affairs information and by having his or her investigation parallel that of the internal affairs unit, the proposed ordinance has the added benefit of providing the new employee with the opportunity to act as a sort of auditor of the police department's investigative procedures. The unique nature of the proposed ordinance does require a few words of warning, however. For a citizen review board to be effective, it is very important that it not only be independent, but that it is understood to be independent as well. Because the investigator's work must parallel that of the Salt Lake City Police Department's internal affairs unit, and because no investigation can take place without police representatives being notified, it may be difficult for community members to distinguish between the investigator and the police department. Public outreach and education about the independence of the new investigator will therefore play an especially important role in the success of this particular model. The potential for confusion is compounded by the fact that no investigation can occur without an individual first contacting the police department's internal affairs unit. Consequently, it is extremely important that the internal affairs process be as open, accessible, and unintimidating as possible. Finally, it is our understanding that under the proposed ordinance, the investigator will have the same opportunity to request subpoenas as other city employees. Because any meaningful investigation requires a full analysis of the facts surrounding a complaint, it is particularly important that the city grant the investigator's requests to compel witness or police testimony. Despite these cautionary words, we believe that the proposed changes represent positive steps towards an independent review of police practices, and that this review will benefit both Salt Lake City residents and law enforcement officers. Thank you for your consideration of this important matter, and please contact me at 521-9862 ext 100 if you have any questions about our position. cerely, arol Gnade Executive Director September 24, zoo' Salt Lake City Mayor Ross C. Anderson and City Council of Salt Lake City City and County Building 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Mayor and City Council: Re: Salt Lake City Ordinance Repealing and Re-enacting Chapter 2.72 of the Salt Lake City Code, Relating to the Police Civilian Review Board; and Amending Section 2.08.090 of the Salt Lake City Code, Relating to the Police Department. The Multi-ethnic Community Resource Board recommends and supports the Salt Lake City Ordinance Repealing and Re-acting Chapter 2.72 of the Salt Lake City Code, Relating to the Police Civilian Review Board; and Amending Section z.o8.o90 of the Salt Lake City Code, Relating to the Police Department. Of particular encouragement is 2.72.o6o Independent Board Investigator. A. Appointment; Removal, which is in the best interest of legitimate civilian oversight, therein the Mayor shall appoint a full-time investigator for the board. The Mayor shall consider any recommendation of the Board regarding who should be appointed when making such appointment. The investigator shall operate out of the city's Department of Management Services. The investigator shall be an at- will employee and shall be subject to removal by the Mayor, with or without cause, but only after the Mayor considers and recommendations of the Board regarding such removal. Page z We concur with the required qualifications listed for the investigator. Sincerely, Janice W. lemmer, Ph.D., Ph. D.,J.D., Chair Multi-ethnic Community Resource Board To: The Salt Lake City Council From: Ken Gardner, Chair Salt Lake City Civilian Review Board Re: Ordinance Change Dear Council Members I have had the privileged of serving as a member of the Police Review Board since its original formation by Former Chief Ortaga. As it became apparent that the structure did not address the needs or concerns of the city residents, I was honored to serve on the committee that drafted the current ordinance. After lengthy discussion and the strong objects of the former Chief, we reached the compromise that is in place today. We were very much aware the it fell far short of what is really needed. The current Board has with the assistance and cooperation of both Mayor Anderson and Chief Dinse drafted the proposal we hope you will enact. Both the Board and myself feel that it contains the elements needed to make our citizens feel that there is an effective way to address complains concerning their police department. We also feel that the protections needed and deserved by our officers are also included. As Chair of the Review Board, I fully support this proposal and would urge its passage. Thank You Ken Gardner, Chair Salt Lake City Civilian Review Board CC. Mayor Anderson SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE -- No. of 2001 (Police Civilian Review Board) AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND RE-ENACTING CHAPTER 2.72 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO THE POLICE CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD; AND AMENDING SECTION 2.08.090 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah: SECTION 1. That Chapter 2.72 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the Police Civilian Review Board, be, and the same hereby is,repealed and re-enacted as follows: Chapter 2.72 Police Civilian Review Board 2.72.010 Purpose. The best interests of the City and its residents will be served by civilian oversight of certain complaints and internal police investigations regarding conduct of the police. As such, the Civilian Review Board will audit and review all cases in which it is claimed that a police officer used excessive force and such other cases as the Board in its discretion may request. Such audit and review are intended to foster trust between the community and law enforcement personnel and to assure fair treatment to police officers. 2.72.020 Definitions. For the purpose of this Chapter, unless otherwise apparent from the context, certain words and phrases used in this Chapter are defined as follows: A. "Board" means the Police Civilian Review Board created under this Chapter. B. "Board Advisor" means the Board Advisor appointed pursuant to Section 2.72.030(D). C. "City" means Salt Lake City Corporation, a Utah municipal corporation. D. "Council" means the City Council of the City. E. "Internal Affairs Unit" means the internal affairs unit of the Police Department. F. "Investigator"means the independent Board investigator appointed pursuant to Section 2.72.060. G. "Mayor" means the duly elected or appointed and qualified Mayor of the City. H. "Member" or"member of the Board"means a person appointed by the Mayor who is duly qualified and acting as a member of the Board. I. "Panel" or"Board review panel" means a panel of Board members described in Section 2.72.180. J. "Person" means an individual. K. "Police Chief' means the Chief of Police of the City. L. "Police Department" means the Police Department of the City. 2.72.030 Board Appointments; Term of Office; Board Advisor. A. Creation. The Board is hereby created. B. Appointments by Mayor. The Mayor, with the advice and consent of the Council, shall appoint fourteen (14) civilians as members of the Board. Included in this number shall be two (2) from each Council district. The Mayor shall make such appointments with a goal of providing geographical, professional, neighborhood, racial, gender and ethnic diversity to the Board so that balanced community representation is achieved. Officers or employees of the City shall not be appointed to the Board. 2 C. Term of Office. All members of the Board shall serve for a two (2) year term, provided that the terms of the initial appointees shall be staggered so that not more — than seven (7) terms shall expire in any one year. Each member's term of office shall expire on the first Monday in September. A member shall not serve more than two (2) consecutive full terms. D. Board Advisor. The Mayor shall appoint, as Board Advisor, a person with prior police experience, who is not at the time employed by the Police Department or any other law enforcement agency, to provide input and advice to the Board. The Board Advisor shall have the same term of office as members of the Board and shall not serve for more than two (2) consecutive terms. The Board Advisor is not a member of the Board and does not have a vote on the Board. 2.72.040 Policies and Procedures. The Board shall adopt policies and procedures, not inconsistent with this Chapter, for the conduct of its meetings, for the conduct of meetings of panels, and for any other purposes it considers necessary for its proper functioning. 2.72.050 Organization. A. Officers. The Board shall annually select from its members a chair and a vice chair. B. Staff. The Mayor shall appoint a full-time investigator for the Board, as provided in Section 2.72.060. The City shall additionally provide staff to create written minutes from any Board and panel meeting recordings. 3 C. Attorney. The City Attorney shall be the attorney for the Board.In the event of a conflict of interest,any legal advice or assistance shall be obtained,as directed by the Office of the City Attorney. 2.72.060 Independent Board Investigator. A. Appointment;Removal. In the interest of legitimate civilian oversight, the Mayor shall appoint a full-time independent Investigator for the Board. In making such appointment,the Mayor shall consider any recommendations of the Board regarding who should be appointed. The Investigator shall operate out of the City's Department of Management Services. The Investigator shall be an at-will employee and shall be subject to removal by the Mayor,with or without cause,but only after the Mayor considers any recommendations of the Board regarding such removal. B. Required Qualifications. The Investigator shall have the following qualifications: 1. Experience in public sector labor and employment law(preferably relating to police and firefighters),Utah civil service law,and civil rights law,or the ability to quickly learn applicable legal principles. 2. Strong interpersonal and supervisory skills. 3. Objectivity toward police and community interests. 4. No felony convictions or misdemeanor criminal convictions in cases involving violence or moral turpitude.The Investigator shall not be under a pending felony indictment or information when appointed.A felony conviction or indictment or information,or a conviction of a misdemeanor involving violence or moral turpitude after appointment,shall be a basis for removal. 4 5. Strong writing skills. 6. Verbally articulate. 7. Strong interviewing skills. C. Desired Investigator Qualifications. If possible, the Investigator shall have the following qualifications: 1. Mediation training and mediation experience. 2. History of community involvement and public service. 3. Administrative and management skills. 4. Ability to positively interact with citizens,police officers, and the community. 5. Trial or appellate experience. 2.72.070 Criminal Conviction or Pending Indictment. No person may be appointed as a member of the Board who has (1) any felony convictions, pending indictments or informations; or (2) misdemeanor criminal convictions, pending indictments or informations in cases involving violence or moral turpitude. A felony conviction or a conviction for a misdemeanor involving violence or moral turpitude after appointment to the Board, shall be a basis for removal from the Board. 2.72.080 Voluntary Service; Immunity From Liability. Board members and the Board Advisor shall perfoiiu their services on or for the Board without pay or other compensation, except for payment or reimbursement of expenses actually and reasonably incurred as approved in writing, in advance, by the Mayor, Board members and the Board Advisor shall be deemed volunteers as defined in 5 Title 67, Chapter 20, Utah Code Annotated, as amended, or any successor statue, and, as such, shall be defended by the City Attorney, but shall be immune from any liability with respect to any decision or action taken in the performance of their duties and responsibilities on or for the Board as provided by Title 63, Chapter 30b, Utah Code Annotated, as amended, or any successor statute. 2.72.090 Removal from Office. Any member of the Board or the Board Advisor may be removed from office by the Mayor, for cause, prior to the normal expiration of the term for which such member or advisor was appointed. 2.72.100 Vacancy Filling. Any vacancy on the Board shall be filled for the unexpired term of the vacated member in the same manner as the member whose position has been vacated was appointed. 2.72.110 Members' Ethics. Members shall be subject to and bound by the provisions of the City's Conflict of Interest Ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code, or any successor ordinance. Any violations of the provisions of said Chapter shall be grounds for removal from office. 2.72.120 Eligibility For Membership; Training. A. Eligibility. To be eligible to be appointed as a member of the Board, a person shall be at least twenty-one (21) years of age and shall be a resident of the City. B. Training. After being appointed to the Board, but prior to functioning as a member, each member of the Board shall receive the following training regarding the duties of the Board and regarding police practices and procedures: 6 1. A specific training course, as determined by the Police Chief and the Mayor, regarding police practices and procedures, duties of the Board, and cultural diversity. 2. At least one (1) three (3) hour ride along in each of the City's police sectors. 3. Meetings with selected community groups and persons who have an interest in police oversight, as determined by the Police Chief and the Mayor. 4. Eight(8)hours of training provided by the Internal Affairs Division. 5. A supplemental training course containing elements from items 1 through 4 above, as determined by the Police Chief and the Mayor,within thirty(30) days after commencing the second year of the two-year term. The Mayor shall revoke the appointment to the Board of any member who fails to complete such training within three (3) months after such member's appointment to the Board; provided that the Mayor may extend such training deadline if, in the Mayor's judgment, such an extension is appropriate. 2.72.130 Meetings Of Board. A. Regular Meetings. The Board as a whole shall hold regular meetings at least once every three (3) months. B. Panel Meetings. Board review panels may meet as necessary to review cases. C. Open Meeting Law Compliance. Notice of meetings of the Board and panels shall be provided, and records of Board and panel meetings shall be kept, as required in the Open and Public Meetings Act, Title 52, Chapter 4, Utah Code Annotated, 7 • as amended, or any successor statute. The Board and panels may close a meeting if allowed under Section 52-4-5, Utah Code Annotated, as amended, upon the affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the Board or panel present in an open meeting for which notice is given, provided a quorum is present. When a meeting of the Board or a panel involves the discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual, including any police officer, privacy rights are involved, and it is hereby recommended that the Board or panel close such meeting under the Open and Public Meetings Act unless, in their sound discretion, they determine that such meeting should be open to the public. Subject to the Open and Public Meetings Act, the Board and panels shall keep written minutes of their meetings, and records of all of their examinations and official actions. D. Special Meetings; Notice. Special meetings of the Board or panels may be ordered by the chairperson of the Board, a majority of the members of the Board, a majority of the members of the Council, or the Mayor. The order for a special meeting must be signed by the person or persons calling such meeting and, unless waived in writing, each Board member not joining in the order must be given not less than three (3) days prior notice of the meeting. Such notice shall be served personally or left at the Board member's residence or business office. E. Location Of Meetings; Record of Proceedings. Meetings shall be held at such public place as may be designated by the Board. The Board and panels shall cause any written minutes of their proceedings to be available for inspection in the office of the City Recorder, except with respect to matters not subject to public disclosure under the Utah Government Records Access and Management Act, Title 63, Chapter 2, Utah 8 Code Annotated, as amended, or any successor statute. The Board and panels shall record the yea and nay votes of the Board or panel members on any action taken by them. The Board and panels may suspend the rules of procedure for their meetings by unanimous vote of the members of the Board or panel, as applicable, who are present at the meeting. The Board or panel shall not suspend the rules of procedure beyond the duration of the meeting at which the suspension of rules occurs. 2.72.140 Quorum and Vote. A. Quorum. No business of the Board as a whole shall be conducted at a meeting without at least a quorum of eight(8)members. No business of a Board panel shall be conducted at a meeting without at least a quorum of three(3)members. B. Vote. All actions of the Board shall be represented by a vote of the members. A simple majority of the voting members present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be required for any action to be taken. All actions of a Board panel shall be represented by a vote of the participating members. A simple majority of the panel members present at each meeting at which a quorum is present shall be required for any action to be taken. C. Effective Date of Decision. Any decision of the Board or any panel shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. 2.72.150 Investigations by the Board. A. In General; Notice. The Investigator shall have access to all Internal Affairs Unit investigations in which it is claimed that a police officer used excessive force, together with such other investigations as the Board in its discretion may request. 9 The Police Department shall notify the Board through the Investigator when cases are initiated by the Internal Affairs Unit. B. Citizen Requested Investigations. Any person who files with the Police Department a complaint about a police officer, whether or not claiming that the police officer used excessive force, may, within ninety-six (96) hours after filing such complaint, file with the Board a request that the Board investigate the complaint. At the time a person files such a complaint with the Police Department, the Police Department shall notify such person in writing of the person's right, within ninety-six (96) hours after such filing, to request a Board investigation of the complaint. The Board, in its discretion, may grant or deny such request, and Board shall promptly notify the person making the request of the Board's decision to grant or deny the request. If the Board grants the request, it shall promptly notify the Internal Affairs Unit thereof, and the Investigator shall have access to the Internal Affairs Unit's investigation of such complaint. C. Investigator's Database. When the Investigator is notified that a complaint is filed with the Internal Affairs Unit, or when the Board agrees to investigate a complaint at the request of a person pursuant to subsection(B), the Investigator shall ensure that all pertinent data concerning the complaint is collected and entered into a computer database for future analysis. D. Investigator's Access to Files. The Investigator shall have access, via computer database network, to all Police Department files on its network, except those files that are confidential by law. The Investigator shall not discuss with or release the contents of those files to any person other than members of the Board, the Police Chief or his or her designee, the Internal Affairs Unit, the Mayor or his or her designee, or the to Office of the City Attorney. A breach of this confidentiality obligation by the Investigator or any related staff shall be grounds for removal from office, as well as civil and criminal liability pursuant to any applicable City, state or federal law. E. Investigator's Access to Internal Affairs Investigation. The Investigator shall have unfettered access to the Internal Affairs Unit investigation process. The Investigator may inquire of the commander of the Internal Affairs Unit or the applicable Assistant Police Chief about the status of any open case. F. Investigator; Interviews. 1. Access to Internal Affairs Interviews. The Investigator shall have access to all interviews scheduled by the Internal Affairs Unit. The Police Department shall notify the Investigator when all interviews are scheduled so that he or she may be present, at the Investigator's discretion. The Investigator may participate in questioning the witnesses. The Investigator may request that the Internal Affairs Unit interview witnesses or collect evidence, as he or she deems appropriate. 2. Disclosure to Witnesses. If the Investigator participates in any portion of the interview process, he or she must clearly communicate to all participating witnesses that he or she is an independent investigator affiliated with the Board and not with the Police Department. 3. Compelling Attendance of Witnesses and Police Officers. If the Investigator desires to interview a witness or a police officer in connection with an open Internal Affairs Unit investigation that the Investigator is investigating or reviewing pursuant to this Chapter, and if such person declines to be interviewed, the Investigator 11 may ask the Mayor to compel the witness or police officer to meet with and be interviewed by the Investigator pursuant to Chapter 2.59, Salt Lake City Code. 4. Presence of Internal Affairs Unit Investigator. The Investigator shall have no contact with any witness or accused employee, except when an Internal Affairs Unit investigator is present or invited to be present. 5. Forwarding of Information to Internal Affairs Unit. Any information relevant to Internal Affairs Unit investigations of which the Investigator becomes aware shall be forwarded immediately to the commander of the Internal Affairs Unit. 6. Protection of Constitutional Rights. The Investigator is bound to the same extent as the Police Department and the City to protect the rights of officers and witnesses under the Utah Constitution and the United States Constitution. G. No Interviews by Board. The Board and Panels shall not call or interview witnesses. H. Completion of Investigator's Investigation. The Investigator shall complete his or her investigation of each case within two (2) days after the completion date of the Internal Affairs Unit's investigation. I. Report of Investigator. Within two (2) days after his or her completion of the investigation of a case, the Investigator shall provide to the Board a written report that summarizes the case and such investigation, and states the Investigator's recommendations regarding the case. J. Board's Access to Investigator's Records. Upon request, the Investigator shall provide to the Board the Investigator's notes and other records regarding cases investigated by the Investigator. 12 2.72.160 Outside Agency Criminal Investigations Concerning Police Use of Force. In cases involving the review of police officer actions by the Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office, the Utah Attorney General's Office, or the United States Department of Justice, the Investigator shall review the case only after the review by such outside agency is completed, unless (a) the Board, in consultation with the applicable outside agency, directs otherwise, and (b) if the Internal Affairs Unit determines to commence an investigation before completion of the outside agency review. When the review is completed, the Investigator shall have access to all materials provided to the Internal Affairs Unit by the Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office, the Utah Attorney General's Office, or the United States Department of Justice. 2.72.170 Internal Affairs Unit Report. At the completion of an Internal Affairs Unit investigation(a) in cases in which it is claimed that a police officer used excessive force, (b) in other cases that the Board in its discretion has requested to review, or(c) in cases in which the Board agrees to investigate a complaint at the request of a person pursuant to Section 2.72.150(B), a copy of the Internal Affairs Unit report shall be forwarded immediately to the Investigator and the Board. 2.72.180 Board Review Panels. The Board shall assign a Board review panel to review (a) each Internal Affairs Unit case in which it is claimed that a police officer used excessive force, (b) such other cases the Board in its discretion may request, and (c) cases the Board agrees to investigate at the request of a person pursuant to Section 2.72.150(B). Each panel shall consist of five (5) randomly chosen members from the full Board. A new panel shall be 13 selected for each new case. The panel shall review the Investigator's report on the case delivered to the Board pursuant to Section 2.72.150(I). 2.72.190 Board Review Panel Reports. A. Majority Report. At the completion of a panel's review of a case pursuant to Section 2.72.180, the panel shall prepare a report and immediately forward a copy of that report to the Police Chief and to the Board. The panel's report shall contain, at a minimum, recommendations concerning case disposition and any other recommendations to the Police Chief in terms of the individual case or general practices or policies. The report shall be filed as promptly as possible, considering the time needed for the filing of minority reports and the Police Department's deadline for completing internal investigations of complaints, after the panel receives the Internal Affairs Unit's report on the case pursuant to Section 2.72.170. B. Minority Report. If less than all of the panel members join in the report to the Police Chief and to the Board, any member not joining in the report may file with the Police Chief and the Board a minority report, setting forth such person's conclusions regarding the case. Any minority report must be filed within seven (7) days after the filing of the majority report. 2.72.200 Communication of Case Disposition. All reports containing a case disposition or recommended case disposition shall contain the classifications consistent with Police Department policy: "unfounded"; "exonerated"; "no determination is possible"; and "sustained." In addition to the classification, a definition of each teini shall be included in the report. The definitions are as follows: (1) "unfounded": the reported complaint did not occur; (2) "exonerated": the 14 employee's actions were reasonable under the circumstances; (3) "no determination is possible": there is insufficient evidence to support a conclusion as to whether or not the — employee violated policy; (4) "sustained": the employee's action(s) are in violation of policy or procedure of the Police Department. 2.72.210 Police Department Response to Case. Absent exigent circumstances in which the Police Chief, in his or her sole discretion, determines that a discipline decision must be made before he or she receives a majority and any minority reports pursuant to Section 2.72.190, the Police Chief shall review and consider such majority and minority reports prior to making a discipline decision in the related case. However, the decision to discipline or not to discipline an officer, as well as the appropriate discipline, is within the sole discretion of the Police Chief Immediately following a decision of the Police Chief to discipline or not to discipline a police officer for the alleged use of excessive force and in any other case the Board has designated for review or investigation pursuant to Section 2.72.150, the Police Chief shall submit to the Board and the Investigator a report outlining the case disposition. If the Board disagrees with the case disposition, the Board may communicate the disagreement to the Police Chief in written format, with a copy to the Mayor. 2.72.220 Audits By Board. A. Semiannual Audits. Not less than once every six (6) months, the Board shall audit and review the reports of the Board review panels with respect to all internal police investigations commenced since the completion of the next preceding audit involving cases in which it is claimed that a police officer used excessive force, together 15 with such other cases as the Board in its discretion may request. The Board may also obtain and review any records or reports of the Investigator or the Internal Affairs Unit. B. Semiannual Reports. 1. Majority Report. After it finishes each audit, the Board shall prepare a semiannual advisory report highlighting the trends in police performance and stating its findings, conclusions and recommendations regarding changes in police policy and procedures. Patterns of behavior, unclear procedures, policy issues, and training needs may be identified for review. A report shall be completed and filed with the Mayor, the Council, and the Police Chief within thirty(30) days after each of the Board's semiannual audits. 2. Minority Report. If less than all of the members of the Board join in the majority report of the Board,any member not joining in the majority report may file with the Mayor, the Council, and the Police Chief a minority report, setting forth such person's conclusions regarding the audit. Any minority report must be filed within seven (7) days after the filing of the majority report. 3. Confidentiality of Reports. No semiannual advisory reports shall contain the names of any individual persons. Except during a closed session of the Board, no individuals shall be mentioned by name in any verbal or written statements by the Board or the members thereof. 4. Copies of Semiannual Advisory Reports. Copies of such reports shall be provided to the Mayor, each member of the Council, and the Police Chief. 16 5. Staff Support. The Police Department and the Mayor's Office shall cooperate with the Investigator to ensure that the Board obtains all information and resources necessary to gather information for its reports. 2.72.230 Citizen Requested Review Procedure. A. Requests for Review by Persons. 1. In General. Any person (other than a police officer who was the subject of a complaint) who is dissatisfied with a decision of the Police Chief regarding a complaint filed against a police officer, may request a review of the decision by a Board review panel. The Board may adopt rules for establishing a standard for review and rules for creating a system of case review prioritization. 2. Deadline for Request. The request must be filed within thirty(30) days after the person's receipt of the determination of the Police Chief. The Board may adopt rules for permitting late filings in extraordinary circumstances. 3. Form and Delivery of Request. A request for review, signed and dated by the person making the request, must be filed in writing, personally or by mail, at the office of the Investigator or at such other location as the Board may from time to time designate. 4. Contents of Request. The request for review must include: (a) the name, address and telephone number of the person requesting review; (b) the approximate date the complaint was filed, if known; (c) the substance of the complaint; and (d) the reason or reasons the complainant is dissatisfied with the Police Chiefs decision. 17 • B. Filing False Complaints. Any person who files a complaint against a police officer under this Section or Section 2.72150(B), knowing that such complaint is frivolous, malicious or false, shall be guilty of a Class C misdemeanor. In addition, any person who files a complaint against a police officer knowing that such complaint is frivolous, malicious or false, shall be civilly liable for all costs and expenses incurred in investigating and otherwise responding to the complaint. A complaint is frivolous if it has no reasonable basis in fact. The Board may adopt rules that allow it to dismiss any claim that it deems frivolous,malicious or false. C. Review Procedure. 1. Investigator's Review. Consistent with Section 2.72.230(A)(1), the Investigator shall review all requests for review. While reviewing the request for review, the Investigator may not question witnesses, but shall have access to all records of the Police Department regarding the incident of alleged misconduct involved. The Police Department and the Mayor's Office shall cooperate with the Investigator so that the Investigator obtains all necessary information and resources. The Investigator shall comply with any City, state, or federal laws regarding privacy and confidentiality of such records. 2. New Information. If during the investigation new information becomes available to either the Internal Affairs Unit or the Investigator, it shall be given to the Police Chief. 3. Investigator's Report; Reopening of Cases. Upon completion of the review, the Investigator shall issue a report to the Board, with a copy to the Police Chief and the Internal Affairs Unit, concerning the perceived appropriateness of the previously 18 issued case disposition by the Police Chief. The Board shall appoint a panel to review the Investigator's report. The panel must complete its review no later than seventy-five (75) days after it receives the Investigator's report. If the panel wishes, it may request in writing that the Police Department reopen the case. The Police Chief shall determine whether or not to reopen the case and shall communicate this determination to the Board in writing, with a copy to the Internal Affairs Unit. If the Board disagrees with the Police Chief's determination, the Board may communicate its disagreement to the Police Chief in written format, with a copy to the Mayor. 4. Board's Report. After reaching its conclusion,the Board shall file with the complainant, the Mayor, the Police Chief, and the Internal Affairs Unit a written report regarding the matter, including a statement as to whether or not the Police Chief decided to reopen the case. 5. Minority Reports. If during the review process less than all of the Board members join in reports to the Mayor, the Police Chief, or the Internal Affairs Unit, any member not joining in the report may file with the Mayor, the Police Chief, the Internal Affairs Unit, and the Board a minority report, setting forth such member's conclusions ti. regarding the case. Any minority report must be filed within seven (7) days after the filing of the majority report. 2.72.240 Confidentiality of Records. Records and reports under this Chapter shall be kept in compliance with the Government Records Access and Management Act, Title 63 Chapter 2, Utah Code Annotated, as amended, or any successor statute. 19 2.72.250 Cooperation and Coordination. A. In General. All City officers and employees, including those of the Police Department, shall provide complete and prompt cooperation to the Board in the discharge of its duties. The Board and other City officers and employees shall coordinate their activities so that such officers and employees and the Board can fully and properly perform their respective duties. B. Police Department. It is recognized that the memorandum of agreement between the City and the Salt Lake Police Association contains a deadline by which the Police Department must notify police officers of the disposition of any internal Police Department disciplinary investigation and of any disciplinary action to be administered. The Police Department and the Police Chief are encouraged to complete their internal investigations in such a manner and time that the Board and Board review panels have sufficient time to perform their duties and issue their majority and any minority reports prior to such deadline in the memorandum of agreement, in order to allow the Police Chief to consider such reports prior to making a decision regarding discipline. 2.72.260 Board Actions Shall not Bind the Mayor or Police Chief. The recommendations of the Board shall not be deemed to bind the Mayor and the Police Chief in their determinations. Nothing in this Chapter shall be construed to be a delegation of the Mayor's responsibility and authority regarding the Police Department. 2.72.270 No Creation of Legal Standard or Third Party Rights Nothing in this Chapter shall create any legal standard regarding conduct by the City, the Board, the Investigator, or the Police Department, nor create any third party rights whatsoever, except as specifically provided in this Chapter. 20 2.72.280 Publicizing of Investigation and Review Procedures. The Police Department and the Mayor's Office shall publicize (a) that the Board investigates all Internal Affairs Unit investigations in which it is claimed that a police officer used excessive force, and such other investigations as the Board in its discretion may request, (b) the availability of the citizen requested investigation procedure described in Section 2.72.150(B), and(c) the availability of the citizen requested review procedure described in Section 2.72.230, and shall educate the public regarding where and when to file requests for review or investigation. In order to publicize the review and investigation procedures,the Police Department and the Mayor's Office shall develop brochures and other written publicity materials, and shall provide for dissemination of information through other forms of media, which are not limited to written information, within budgeted appropriations. SECTION 2. That Section 2.08.090 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the Police Department, be, and the same hereby is, amended as follows: 2.08.090 Police Department: A. Functions: The Police Department by and through its sworn officers, shall be responsible for preserving the public peace, preventing crime, detecting and arresting criminal offenders, protecting the rights of persons and property, regulating and controlling motorized and pedestrian traffic, training sworn personnel, and providing and maintaining police records and communications systems. B. Duties: The Chief of the Police Department shall be the appointing power and have command over all the officers, members and employees in the department. It 21 shall be the duty of the Chief, subject to the approval of the mayor, to make and adopt such rules and regulations for the operation and administration of the department, as in the Chiefs judgment, shall be necessary for the good of the service. C. Early Warning System: The Chief of the Police Department, taking into account the recommendations of the Civilian Review Board and the Civilian Review Board's Investigator pursuant to Chapter 2.72, shall develop an early warning system whereby the Police Department administration shall be notified by the Police Department's Internal Affairs Unit if a police officer has exhibited a pattern of generating complaints with the Internal Affairs Unit. This early warning system shall be activated regardless of the subsequent disposition of such complaint. When the early warning system is activated for a particular police officer, the Chief of Police shall review the circumstances and, where appropriate in his or her judgment, require such officer to receive counseling, testing, or training. The Police Department shall document the pattern of behavior of the police officer, the review by the Chief of Police, and the assigned counseling, testing, or training of such officer. SECTION 3. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon the date of its first publication. 22 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2001. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attomey's Office Date f('i C—C CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2001. Published: G\Ordina0l\Police Civilian Review Board v9cleandoc 23 NCIV 2 c 2001 ISON GREGERSEN WEYHER , ' �r rr rk�witU I Gt" �RM° e IIOI , itoI '.►� ..w . �.�� ROSS C. "ROCKY" ANDERSON DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAYOR COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ./" I TO: Rocky Fluhart, Chief Administrative Officer Date:Date: November 15, 2001 FROM: David Dobbins /1,7 K RE: Quarterly Housing Report for Fiscal Year 2001-02 First Quarter STAFF CONTACT: LuAnn Clark 535-6136 DOCUMENT TYPE: Written briefing DISCUSSION: The City Council has requested quarterly housing reports from the Community and Economic Development Department. The following information has been included in the report: • Loans for first time homebuyers, single-family rehabilitation and multi-family rehabilitation (reported separately) • List of the funding sources with the dollar amount spent for the fiscal years • Demolition permits reported by the structure and the number of units • Housing Trust Fund ledger • Residential subdivision approval activity report • Residential condominium approval activity report • Boarded houses or apartments listed by district Council Member Carlton Christensen asked that the Administration include in the quarterly housing report information showing the breakdown of housing starts per district. This information is not available this quarter because the Building Services and Licensing Division is transitioning from its old electronic reporting system to a new one. The information will be available for the next quarterly report. 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 841 1 1 TELEPHONE: 801-535-6230 FAX: 801-535-6005 ®RECYCLED PAPER HOUSING QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT July 1, 2001 —September 30, 2001 First Quarter The First Time Homebuyer Program, which uses the HOME, CDBG, Rental Rehab programs and Bank partners to help families purchase their first home. At the end of the first quarter, eleven homes are in the process of rehabilitation, and two new construction projects are in the bid process for first time homebuyers to purchase. Two families were placed in new homes in the quarter. Our closings have been delayed due to the contractor's delays in starting rehabilitation projects. We are running continuing to run a monthly advertisement in the newspapers to seeking additional contractors to add to our bid list to alleviate these construction delays. First Time Home Buyer Loans Fiscal YTD 1"quarter Loans Closed 2 2 Dollar Amount $234,500 $234,500 Average Per Loan $117,250 $117,250 The Housing Rehabilitation Program has completed 31 projects with 64 units this fiscal year. The total for the fiscal year is 64 units. Single Family Rehabilitation Projects Fiscal YTD 1st Quarter Loans Closed 24 24 Dollar Amount $444,131 $444,131 Change Orders $2,000 $2,000 Average Per Loan $ 18,588.79 $18,588.79 Multi-Family Rehabilitation Projects Fiscal YTD 1st Quarter Loans Closed 7 7 Dollar Amount $383,848 $383,848 Average Per Loan $54,835.43 54,835.43 Number of Units 40 40 Average Per Unit $9,596.20 $9,596.20 . The list below shows a percentage of total dollars spent with each funding source. — FUNDING SOURCES Fiscal YTD %OF 1"Quarter %OF 7/01/00—6/30/01 FUNDS 04/1/01-06/30/01 FUNDS Community Development $ 385,788.00 35% $ 385,788.00 35% Block Grant Rental Rehab Funds $ 263,334.00 25% $ 263,334.00 25% Personal Contributions $ 8,000.00 1% $ 8,000.00 1% Private Funding Sources $ 347,238.00 33% $ 347,238.00 33% Home $ 50,345.00 5% $ 50,345.00 5% River Park $ 9,774..00 0% $ 9,774.00 1% TOTAL $ 1,064,479.00 100% $ 1,064,479.00 100% Below is a list of our mailing outreach efforts for the first quarter. DATE of MAILING NUMBER AREA September 6,2001 300 1700 South to 2100 South 700 East to Main Street September 19,2001 700 1700 South to 2100 South 700 East to Main Street Total Mailed 1,000 STATUS ON CURRENTLY FUNDED PROJECTS: Phoenix Circle Subdivision: Size: 7 New Homes - 2 twin homes and 3 detached, single family homes Target Population: First-Time Homebuyers Location: 200 North and 600 West Partners: Salt Lake City, and the Multi-Bank Pool(financing) Preliminary Review with Council Member: Met with Council member Reid and Janice Jardine on April 9, 1996. Council member supported as long as homes were built for home ownership and approval received from Community Council. Met with Council Member Christensen, Janice Jardine and Kristen Kamerath on March 12, 1998 . Council Member Christensen supported project as preliminary designed. Community Council: Fair Park Community Council approved project on June 27, 1996. Status: The easement issue has not been resolved. Riverview Subdivision Size: 7 Single-Family Homes Target Population: Mixed Income Location: 1000 West 700 South(former LDS church site) Partners: Salt Lake City, LDS Church land donation, (SLC will paid for demo/cleanup and asbestos removal) Preliminary Review with Council Member: Met with Council member Milner and Janice Jardine on October 3, 1996. Community Council: preliminary subdivision plans were taken to Popular Grove Community Council meeting for review and comments on March 26, 1997. Community Council updated November 19, 1997. Status: Final home is for sale as market rate housing. Sherwood Place Size: 6 Single-Family Homes Target Population: Mixed Income Location: 350 Navajo Street (former LDS Church site) Partners: Salt Lake City, LDS Church land donation, (SLC will pay for demo/cleanup and asbestos removal) Preliminary Review with Council Member: Met with Council member Milner and Janice Jardine on October 3, 1996. Council member Milner indicated support for homeownership on the site. Community Council: Preliminary Subdivision plans were taken to Popular Grove Community Council for review and comments on March 26, 1997. Community Council updated November 19, 1997. Status: Subdivision is being reviewed by appropriate City Departments. Building Permit Activity for First Quarter: July No. of Units Permits Issued* Single Family Dwelling 17 17 Duplex 2 2 Manufactured Homes 3 3 Total New Construction 22 21 Additions, Alterations and Repairs 74 177 Total Residential Construction 95 198 Demolition Permits Single Family Dwelling 1 1 Apartment 1 1 Ten of the single family permits issued in April were for a valuation of $100,000 or more. Land costs are not included in the valuation amount. August No. of Units Permit Issued* Single Family Dwellings 15 15 Duplex Dwellings 2 1 Manufactured Homes 3 3 Total New Residential Construction 17 17 Additions, Alterations and Repairs 77 221 Total Residential Construction 168 215 Demolition Permits Single Family Dwelling 7 7 Duplex Dwelling 6 2 Nine of the permits issued for single family dwellings in August were issued for $100,000 or more. Land costs are not included in valuation amount. September No. of Units Permits Issued* Single Family Dwellings 18 18 Duplex Dwelling 2 1 Manufactured Homes 3 3 Total new residential construction 23 22 Additions, Alterations and Repairs 110 145 Total Residential Construction 133 167 Demolition Permits Single Family Dwellings 2 2 Eight of the single family permits issued in September were for a valuation of $100,000 or more. Please note that land costs are not included in the valuation amount. *Permits Issued Category is the number of permits issued to a contractor or sub contractor for plumbing, electrical, mechanical, etc. permits. All building permit information has been provided by the Building Services and Licensing Division. BOARDED BUILDING ACTIVITY: — Existing Boarded Building as June 30, 2001 98 Vacant/Secure Buildings as of June 30, 2001* 7 Demolition Permits (3) Remodeled/Rehabilitated (14) New Buildings Boarded 6 Total Boarded Buildings as of 6/30/01 86 Buildings Vacant/Secure 4 *Vacant properties where complaints or activities have required the staff to monitor but not boarded. Attached please fmd a detailed report of the boarded homes by district. HOUSING TRUST FUND LEDGER 02-1st Q HTF HOUSING TRUST FUND LEDGER - September 30, 2001 72-17004-Federal INCOME CONTRACT EXPENSE OBJECT BALANCE DATE DESCRIPTION ENCUMBER CODE Critchlow Loan Payment 50.00 013708 2,784,430.56 07/03/2001 Loan payment-Huntsman Apts.Loan Wendell LLC 26678- Rehab Loan _ 11,770.90 2590 08/29/2001 Wendall Apartments 72-5-01-8825-Bal 31,791.81 Critchlow Loan Payment 50.00 _ 013708 2,784,480.56 08/07/2001 Loan payment-Huntsman Apts.Loan Housing Mitigation$-LDS Church 3,000.00 1890 2,787,480.56 08/16/2001 house demo'd at 1082 S 900 W Critchlow Loan Payment 50.00 013708 2,787,530.56 09/06/2001 Loan payment-Huntsman Apts.Loan NHS-City Front Apts Loan _ 1,500,000.00 2590 1,287,530.56 09/06/2001 Loan-155 units/60%affordable-641 W No.Temple Wendell LLC 26678-Rehab Loan 11,532.95 2590 09/24/2001 Wendall Apartments 72-5-01-8825 bal 20,258.86 Page 1 PLANNING DIVISION RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND CONDOMINIUM APPROVALS AND ACTIVITY REPORT QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT- SUBDIVISION/CONDO RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION APPROVALS ACTIVITY REPORT, JULY - SEPTEMBER 2001 Number of Lots Date Proiect Name Address Final Preliminary Type Preliminary Plats* 7/16/01 RDA/HAND/NHS 319—579 North Pugsley 2* Res. 7/16/01 RDA/HAND/NHS 521-540 North Pugsley 3* Res. 8/2/01 Mitchel Sub. 895 North 1300 West 2* Res. Amd.Cone&Roberts 8/27/01 Kurz Minor Sub. 1025& 1029 Kensington Ave 2* Res. 9/24/01 Forest Park PD 2576 South 900 East 5* Res. 9/27/01 Pioneer Square Ind. 1930 S. Fremont Dr. 2* Non Res. Park Plat"C" Minor Subdivisions Notice-Final 7/30/01 Lopez Routine 433 N. Kress Cir.& 2* Res. Lot Line Adjustment 1421 W.Riverside Cir. 8/7/01 Oliver Minor Sub631 &633 N. 2 Res. West Capitol 8/27/01 Muscantine Place934-900 West Freemont 1 Res. 9/20/01 Laurel Hurst 2016-2010 S.2500 E. 2 Res. 8/21/01 Moffitt 760-812 S.Redwood Rd. 2 Non.Res. Subdivisions Final Plats Amended Final Plats 9/24/01 Capitol Park PD Amd. 305 E. 11th Ave. 1 Res. lot 205 9/27/01 West Drive Amd. 131 Mead Ave. 2 Res. 9/25/01 Hot Springs Amd. 1090 W.2180 W. 4 Non Res. Quarter Total 32 *These projects will appear again on a future Quarterly Report,for a final plat approval of some kind. Do not add these numbers to the approved subdivision lot totals. QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT- SUBDIVISION/CONDO RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM APPROVALS ACTIVITY REPORT, JULY - SEPTEMBER 2001 Number of Units Date Project Name Address Final Preliminary Price Range/Unit Apartment Conversion Preliminary 10-29-01 Elizabeth House* 175 N. Canyon Rd. 24 unknown " " 10-29-01 Premier Apartments* 19&23 S.800 E. 24 $80K to$130K Final 0 Conversion Non-Residential to Residential Preliminary* 0 Final 0 New Construction Preliminary* 0 Final 8/10/01 Old Mill Condo 500 E.2233 S. 38 unknown Quarter Total 38 48 *These projects will appear again on a future Quarterly Report,for a final plat approval. Do not add these numbers to the approved condominium unit totals. Source: Salt Lake City Corp.,Community Econ c Development,Planning Division December 2000 BOARDED LIST BY DISTRICT Boarded Buildings Activity 1st Quarter 2002 July 1 2001-September 30, 2001 Existing Boarded Buildings as of June 30, 2001 98 Vacant/Secure Buildings as of June 30, 2001* 7 Demolition Permits 3 Rehabilitated/Remodel 14 New Boarded Buildings 6 Total Boarded Buildings 86 Buildings Vacant/Secure* 4 Prepared by Nole Walkingshaw *Properties, which are vacant, and complaints or activity is such that they require monitoring but not boarding. 1 Housing d Neighborhood Development SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 10/09/2001 District#1 Address Bidwell No. Owner Owner's Address Boarded* Comments 344 W. 600 North 08-36-127-012 Brite Investments 140 E. Pioneer Ave. Sping 1996 no permit Sandy, UT 84070-1031 226 N. 600 West 08-36-305-010 Robert E. Sampson 605 K Street 1995 No permit 322-3101 SLC, UT 84103-3261 554-56 N 300 W 08-36-205-005 Redevelopment Agency 451 South State St. Rm 415 permit expires 5/02 SLC,UT 84101 677 North 300 West 08-25-453-003 RDA Salt Lake City, 451 South State St. Rm 418 permit expires 5/02 C/O Danny Walz Salt Lake City, Ut 84111 1044 West 200 South 15-02-178-020 Latter Day Saints Church of Christ PTB Exp. 3/17/2001 P.O. Box 65644 SLC, Utah 84165 956 W. 200 South 15-02-251-023 Premier Roofing 1183 W 900 S Spring 1997 SLC, UT 84104-2043 578 N. Redwood Rd. 08-34-202-12 Alan T. Parsons 724 South 300 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 527 N. 300 W. 08-36-204-028 Redevelopent Agency of 451 South State St. Rm 418 Permit expires 5/02 Salt Lake Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 362 N Edmonds PI 08-36-154-034 Edward &Tonya Hayes 351 East 6310 South Mar-00 Boarded 3/00 NO ptb Salt Lake City, Utah 84107 203 North Redwood Rd 08-34-331-015 Vasilios Priskos 51 East 400 South Two Units Boarded Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 574 North 300 West 08-36-205-001 RDA of Salt Lake City 451 South State St.#418 Boarded Commercial Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 PTB expires 5/02 271 West 600 North 08-36-205-010 RDA of Salt Lake City 451 South State St.#418 Boarded Single Family Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 PTB expires 5/02 176 North Duder St. 08-34-331-017 Vasilios Priskos 51 East 400 South#210 No PTB 185 North Harold St Same Parcel Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 1898 North 2200 West 08-21-276-001 Cottonwood Airport Center LC 2855 Cottonwood parkway#560 do Cottonwood Realty Service Salt Lake City, Ut 84121 1862 North 2200 West 08-21-276-002 Cottonwood Airport Center LC 2855 Cottonwood Parkway#560 do Cottnwood Realty Service Salt Lake City, UT 84121 1822 North 2200 West 08-21-276-005 Cottonwood Airport Center LC 2855 Cottonwood Parkway#560 do Cottonwood Realty Service Salt Lake City, Utah 84121 CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 10/09/2001 District#2 Address Sidwell No. Owner Owner's Address Boarded* Comments 632 S. Glendale St. 15-02-383-013 Carl W. Barney, Jr. 2837 E. 100 North PRE 1986 No Permit 11/17 Layton, UT 84047 1592 S. Major St. 16-18-156-010 Theron T. & Bonnie F. 40 W. 9400 South 1995 No Permit Miller, 255-6500 Sandy, UT 84070-2635 600 W. 200 South 15-01-501-002 D&RGW Railroad P. O. Box 5482 Sping 1997 Permit expiresl2/99 Denver, CO 80217-5482 855 W. 800 South 15-11-252-007 Clifford White 1250 E.3545 South No Permit 11/12 SLC, UT 84106-2437 124-36 W 1700 South 15-13-280-025 Tage Nyman family limited 1280 E Woodstock Ave Spring 1998 No Permit partnership SLC, Ut 84121-1652 442 West 300 South 15-01-179-011 Kantun, LLC 235 N. Eastcapitol Blvd Winter 1997 Permit Expires 12/99 SLC, Utah 84103 No Permit, Owner 319 South 1000 West 15-02-401-001 Sione T.Tupola PO Box 38 unavailable Laie, HI 96762 772 W 100 S 15-02-230-009 Craig C. & Mary A. Binks 722 West 100 South Active Building permits Salt Lake City, Utah 84104 1419 South Richard St. 15-13-231-014 Tibia Fusis LC 5008 S Naniloa Dr. Pre-Demo App Salt Lake City, Utah 84117 915-17 So Jefferson St 15-12-279-004 Dwight Flickinger 1712 E Princeton Ave 06/04/1999 PTB exp 6/4/00 Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 1235 W Arapahoe Dr 15-11-102-005 Garth C. &Oral M. North 1071 N. Redwood Rd. Vacant/Secure Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 1512 So 900 W. 15-14-253-059 Comm. Dev. Corp of Utah 501 E. 1700 So. May-99 No Permit aka 1512 s 800 w. Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 17 South 800 West 15-02-227-004 Sundowners Motorcycle CIL P.O. Box 511062 Closed to Occupancy Salt Lake City, Utah 84151 by FBI, Secured by incedent response 179 West 500 South 15-01-476-001 Phillips Petrolium Co. PO Box 358 do PTR&C Borger,Texas 79008 138 East 800 South 16-07-152-016 Jason Roundy 369 East 900 South#320 Fire in Single Family Salt Lake City, Ut 84111 W/rehab permits Paul &Carol Rubey 444 E. 12300 South#102 Illegal units in rear Draper, Ut 84020 req. demo or reconversion 624 South 900 West 15-02-455-017 Ronald &Courtney 861 East 800 South Closed to Occ.by Lindsey Salt Lake City, ut 84102 health dept. 512 South 900 West 15-02-452-041 Kuldip Virk 14253 Brentwood Dr. Closed by Health Dept. Salt Lake City,Ut 92392 PTB 06/26/00 15-02-452-042 Dave Bolinder PO Box 391 owns 6'of house Midvale, Ut 84047 317 East 900 South 16-07-179-019 Filia Uipi 313 East 900 South Existing boarded Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 no permit 1380 South 900 West 15-14-202-014 Dalton, David & Georgia PO Box 27532 Fire, Excessive Salt Lake City, Utah 84127 Damage, Closed to Occ. 835 West Genesee Ave 15-11-254-007 Chase Bank of Texas 4708 Mercantile Dr. N Partially Boarded Rear Agent/Linda Coleman Fort Worth,Tx 76137 Windows, listed for sale 938 South Washinton St.15-12-257-01e Pearl Toki do Sione Toki 938 South Washington St. Closed by Health Dept. Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Owner unknown locat. 615 West 800 South 15-12-151-001 Western Dry Mix and 4000 Browns Canyon Road Vacant Cement Plant Packaging Inc. Peoa, Utah 84061 Several Health Dept. CIO Stewart Grow issues. Operating Recycling Buisiness w/o License. Secured w/o boarding monitor for transient prblms. Arson fire 3/26/00 1380 S. W. Temple St 15-13-227-006 SNT Enterprises 1370 South West Temple St. c/o Sattar N Tabriz Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 Application For Demo Conditional use 1091 South Prospect S 15-10-403-012 Greg R. &Joni K. Bailey 1384 East Vinyard Drive Fire Damage Bountiful, Utah 84010 Boarded 1638 West Dalton Ave 15-10-401-004 Jon T Bugger 30 N 200 E Boarded, posted Centerville, Utah 84014 1022 West Euclid Ave 15-02-133-026 Neighborhood Housing 622 West 500 North Recent Acquisition Services Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 1028 West Euclid Ave. 15-02-133-025 Neighborhood Housing 622 West 500 North Recent Acquisition Services Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 1042 So West Temple 15-12-427-026 Edward J & Mary Cordova 1042 So.West Temple St. New Salt Lake City, UT 84104 CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 10/09/2001 District#3 Address Bidwell No. Owner Owner's Address Boarded* Comments 245 1/2 W. 300 North 36-403-037-000 Gerald S. Fitzpatrick 51 Melrose St. #3b PRE 1990 No Permit Melrose, MA 02176 Lein 11/24/98 515 N. Arctic Ct. 08-36-205-027 RDA of SLC %Jones Wa 170 South Main Street PTB exp 05/02 Holbrook& MCDO SLC,UT 84101 322 S 1100 E 16-05-402-026 Paul Schaaf 1140 E Harrison Ave. Stay Granted Salt Lake City, Ut 84105 Going to B.O.A. CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 10/09/2001 District 4 Address Sidwell No. Owner Owner's Address Boarded* Comments 455 E. Sego Ave. 16-06-326-011 Richard K.Thomas 167 W. 1300 North 1992 PTB Expires (801)773-4082 Sunset, UT 84015 26-Aug 2002 A 338 S. Shelmerdine 16-06-202-008 Richard B. Rogers 315W. Hueneme Rd. Permit Expires Camarillo, CA 93012 01/08/2002 520 S. Windsor St 16-05-101-005 ,Peter& Patricia Sadoski 1630 Sunset Dr Sping 1997 Permit expires Logan , Utah 84321 12/02/02 46 S. 700 East 16-05-353-007 Julie A.A. Imaizumi and 780 E. Northcliffe Dr. ; Sping 1997 Permit expires John K. Williams-560-8957 !SLC, UT 84103-3339 Jul-01 634 South 700 East 16-06-283-008 :Martha Daniels '1960 South 400 East No Permit C/O Janice Durham SLC, Utah 84115 558 E. 300 South 16-05-154-003 Winthrop Court LC _ 860 East 4500 South #303 PRE 1992 ! Demo application SLC, UT 84102 ; Hist.Approval 666 East 300 South 16-06-454-019 'William Bleazard 1329 S.Vincent Court PRE 1998 No Permit 359-6553 rSLC UT, 84102-2109 427 E. 600 South 16-06-477-027 j LDS Church 363-9031 ;50 E. North Temple St. , PRE 1992 PTB Exp 1/27/02 SLC, UT 84104 573 E. 600 South 16-05-353-001 .Patsy V. Kuronya 788 E. Shiloh Way PRE 1990 PTB Exp 2/10/02 288-2033 Murray, UT 84107-7654 652 E. 600 South 16-07-276-028 M.S. Management Assoc 367 Trolley Square ; PRE 1990 Exp, 10/09/02 521-9877 1SLC UT 84102 1 501 E 900 South 16-08-101-006 ;Rentco ;PO BOX 57218 Spring 1997 i PTB Exp 3/01/01 . . . . } UT O4157-O�1 `'Murray 8- - 519E000 South 16-06-426-004 Pifts Investment Inc. �2 E ��nan&a . U|o Dr.- � Exp. 1 02 1 ' ' ' - � .�UT8�_S � �� � ' � _--- 517 E Vernier Fq 16-06-426-005 K�.TB Enterproea |no. 80O East � � uth#3O - -" - - 'h Demo '- - —' - - ' - - -^ ^-~ - 8LC. UT841O7 _ _ _App. ByHist 524E Vernier P| .16-06-426-006 ' 'MTB E / G['E� � So out #3O� - -- - - ' - ' - - - - _ - - - -Applying~'` m- Corp. Y6 Cr�- � N��en#O1U8LC_ -. UT841O7_ _ _ App by- H ;� 527 E Vernier P1 10'06-427-010 yWTB_Enterprises.Inc._ 8 East 45OO_South #303-_ 'Applying-' --- for Demo _ _ _ _ ���' UTD41O7 By HisL_ _ 528 EVernier P|_ 10-06-427-011.�K4TB Enterprises Inc. OOO East 4500 South #303-- - ' --- Demo - �� -------'- --T--Applying--- - - --- - UT841D2 | ` ° H�1'- --__ � -- __-- -- - i ' ^ _- -- ' --- ^ 323-32�8 500 E | -'------- - - --- - - '- ---- ' - '-^--'-- :Applying - --- - - - ----- - -32/-329.S 500_E .1 �OO-42-�'O- 12 JNTB E .80O Eao 45OO 8ou� Demo ;SLC UT 84102 App '---'-���,-�������-__-__-__-_� --_--__--����yx ��-___-__ 538 E!Ven}kar P| 16-06-427-018 !K8TB Enterprises Inc. _�BOO Eaot45O0 South #303 _ �- � Demo � 'SLC. UT841O2 i /App by Hist. -' - - - - -''--- -- ----------- F----- '-- '-'~-'~----- ---- 3� 8. �0E 1�4�18 Winthrop �� �0 ��� � � | ------� - ' ' - - . ' ^ - � -- . ^ _-- _---' _-O--8 7U-U'E ' i ~|-__- - y�-�_+-__' ---- '--- ^ - 'John" K. Williams iSLC u**/ 84/03-333980 t . '- 320 South 0OO East 16-O0-427-O3O V0nth Court, U� 860 East _ _ ___ _ __ _ _ _ _ �� ______ _____ 45OO South #3O3 __._ ___ App. By Historic 1144 S Foulger St 16-07-351-001 Marina Rendon 3220 Darwin Ave. Vacant/Secure Los Angeles, CA 90031 1145 S Foulger St 16-07-305-015 Marina Rendon 3220 Darwin Ave Vacant/Secure Los Angeles, Ca 90031 216 South 1100 East 16-05-252-029 Yasuyo& Hirofumi Miyoshi PO BOX 1013 Fire Damage Park City, Utah 84060 613-15 East 500 South 16-06-434-002 Prosperity Enterprises 1218 West 4365 S#4b HAAB Appeal c/o Carrie Fugett Taylorsville, Utah 84123 Econ. Hardship App. 346 East 600 South 16-06-457-001 Clinton Chealey PO Box 1150 Living in trailer in front Grantsville, Utah 84029 yard, closed to Occ. Seeking -- judgement 504 South 900 East 16-05-377-024 Carl Trujillo 9715 S 2810 W :Active permits to cony. .South Jordan, Utah 84095 to SFD 559 East 800 South 16-07-231-034 Dora Gutierrez 418 N. 1400 W. Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 464 South 600 East 16-06-432-020 East Downtown LLC 181 Stewart St. #1111 1Vacant/Secure Slat Lake City, Utah 98101 Econ. Hardship Hist. 632 S 700E rear 16-05-353-014 TS1 Partnership LTD PO Box 6120 Permit Exp 10/9/02 C/O Simon Property Tax Indianapolis In,462066 - - ----- --- - - ---- Dept. 46 S 700 E. rear 16-05-101-004 Audie Leventhal 1519 So. Devenshire Dr. Application for Stay Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 to correct HAAB Def. 822 So 500 E 16-07-253-029 Alzora Paros 822 So. 500 E. Closed to Occ. Salt Lake City. Ut. 84102 I Structural Problems CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 10/09/2001 District#5 Address Bidwell No. Owner Owner's Address Boarded* Comments 1856 South Edison St. 16-18-308-011 Douglas C. Bott 1863 S. State St. 1996 permit exp. 11/30/2000 486-1691 SLC, UT 84115-2075 420 E. Redondo Ave. 16-18-460-004 FirmLand Investment, Inc. 425 E. 2100 South 1990 PTB exp 3/01 SLC, UT 84115-2237 1247 S 1100 E. 16-08-477-064 Liberty Heights Properties PO Box 521494 Small Retail/Demo Salt Lake City, Utah permit active CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 10/09/2001 District#6 Address Sidwell No. Owner Owner's Address Boarded* Comments CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 10/09/2001 District#7 Address Bidwell No. Owner Owner's Address Boarded* Comments 602 E 2100 S 16-19-232-001 Sinclair Oil Corp. PO BOX 30825 PERMIT EXPIRES C/o Sinclair Oil/TXDPT SLC, UT 84130 Dec-99 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Quarterly report , FEDERAL QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT - CDBG/HOME-1ST QUARTER Please Submit the following information within 30 days following the end of each quarter to:Capital Planning and Programming Division,451 S.State St.,Room 406,Salt Lake City,Utah 84111. ORGANIZATION: SALT LAKE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PROJECT/PROGRAM NAME: Administration/Own in Salt Lake/Construction Activities TIME PERIOD COVERED: 7 1 01 TO 9 30 2001 Month Day Year Month Day Year Non- homeless Total Number 30% 80% Indian/ Asian/ Persons with Households/Per Extremely 50%Very 60%Low Moderate White not Black not Alaskan Pacific Female Head Special Home sons Assisted H/P Low Income Low Income Income Income Hispanic Hispanic Native Hispanic Islander of Household Needs Owner Renter Homeless CDBG 6 H 2 1 3 5 1 2 N/A 6 HOME 5 H 2 3 . 4 1 2 N/A 5 RECAP 5 H 1 1 2 2 `r 1 3 1 N/A 5 • TOTAL 16 0 3 5 8 10 0 0 5 1 4 N/A 16 0 0 YTD 16 0 3 5 8 ' 10 0 0 5 1 4 N/A 16 0 0 FEDERAL QUARTERLY BUDGET REPORT-CITY CDBG ADMIN-1ST QUARTER 2001/2002 Please submit the following information regarding you projected and actual expenditure within 30 days following the end of each quarter. PROJECTED ACTUAL Please explain any differences between projected and actual expenditures: July $7,500.00 July $13,708.26 Billing proceedures are to bill 1/129/1/2000 August $7,500.00 August $9,419.37 We still continue to allocate monthly expenses. September $7,500.00 September $9,063.79 1st Qtr.Total $22,500.00 1st Qtr.Total $32,191.42 October October November November December December 2nd Qtr.Total 2nd Qtr.Total January January February February March March 3rd Qtr.Total 3rd Qtr.Total April April May May June June 4th Qtr.Total 4th Qtr.Total FEDERAL QUARTERLY ACCOMPLISHMENTS/STATUS REPORT OISL(Own In Salt Lake)—DOWNPAYMENT ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES—1ST Quarter(2001/2002) DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT FUNDS FUNDING AMOUNT #OF GRANTS #OF GRANTS FUNDED #OF GRANTS AVAILABLE #OF GRANTS FUNDED PERCENTAGE OF #OF GRANTS AVAILABLE SOURCE ALLOCATED TO BE FUNDED AS OF 7/1/01 AS OF 7/1/01 DURING 01/02 GRANT SPENT AS OF 9/30/01 CDBG 00/01 $ 50,000.00 25 17 8 6 68% 2 HOME 00/01 $ 50,000.00 25 7 18 5 28% 13 HOME'01/02 $ 75,000.00 30 0 30 0 0% 30 80 24 56 11 45 RECAPTURED FUNDS 2000/2001 #of HOME Grants Recaptured and #of CDBG Grants Recaptured& #of Grants Funded with Recaptured FUNDING QUARTER Funds Returned to City available for funding CDBG funds. 1'Quarter 4 5 5 2°°Quarter 3f0 Quarter 4'Quarter TOTAL 4 5 5 TYPE OF HOMES PURCHASED WITH GRANT FUNDS 2000/2001 Single-Family Condo Townhomes TOTAL FUNDING QUARTER Detached 1"Quarter 10 3 3 16 2i"Quarter 3f0 Quarter 4'Quarter TOTAL 10 3 3 16 AREA LOCATION OF HOMES PURCHASED WITH GRANT FUNDS 2000/2001 Central So. N.E. East Glendale Rosepark Jackson People's Northwest Poplar Onequa Emerson Sugarhouse Fairmont TOTAL FUNDING City Central Central Downtown Freeway Grove QUARTER 151 Quarter 3 1 2 1 3 2 3 1 16 200 Quarter 3f0 Quarter — 4'Quarter TOTAL 3 1 2 1 3 2 3 1 16 During the 1ST quarter of 2001/2002 the CDC received 50(YTD—50)requests for applications from homebuyers interested in using the OISL grant to purchase homes in the Salt Lake City area. NHO-CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES - 1ST Quarter(2001/2002) Pre-development -325 West Ouray Avenue(440 N.)—negotiating purchase for rehab,resale—home sold to another party -527 East 800 South—Reviewed for possible rehab—CDC did not pursue due to high cost of acquisition/rehab -438 East 800 South—Reviewed for rehab- " -1962-64 West 400 North—signed contract to purchase home for rehab and lot for 4-5 new homes -1960 West 400 North—negotiating purchase of home for rehab and lot for 2-3 new homes -1500 South Richards(50 West)—negotiating purchase of home for rehab and lot for new home -741 East 2700 South—negotiating purchase of lot for new home -1429 So.Richards Street—evaluating for possible rehab or demo/new construction -1419 So.Richards Street- -1103&1115 E.Zenith Avenue—evaluated for rehab&lot split to create individual lots -855 West 800 South—looked at for demo/new construction -640 East 300 South—possible purchase for rehab -252 Herbert Avenue—possible purchase for rehab -728 South 900 West—inspected for purchase,rehab,resale -1100 W.California—inspected for purchase,rehab and/or lot split -600 East Stringham-inspected for purchase,rehab,resale -225 East 2700 South-inspected for purchase,rehab and/or lot split -414 So.Fletcher—Inner City Project site Planning phase - Subdivision phase -9-unit subdivision at 1512 S.900 West. Partially funded with CDBG&HOME funds. Site and utility work underway Under Construction -1082(1078)West 300 South(Demo/New Construction)—new Affordability Project home to be completed 11/15/01. Projects sold -lot at 223 North 800 West—sold to private owner for new construction of innovative narrow home design. cAci+p;`S— During the 1ST quarter of 2001/2002 the CDC processed 11(YTD-11)application requests by interested homebuyers in living within the Salt Lake City limits. See attached Activity Log Summary sheets for the 15'Quarter of 2001/2002. 4 '. STEPHEN A. GOLDSMITH Sa""-'y'� ' 1�,,, !GITY` �ORPORATIO_I RDSS C. ANDERSON PLANNING DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAYOR BRENT B. WILDE PLANNING DIVISION DEPUTY PLANNING DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: City Council Members FROM: Elizabeth Giraud, AICP, Planning Programs Supervisor ;-- C, k— ��` RE: Petition 400-01-17: Text amendment to allow house museums as a conditional use ern in a Landmark Site in residential districts (Section 21A.24.010(S)) DATE: December 3, 2001 On November 6, 2001, I presented a proposed text amendment to the zoning ordinance to allow house museums as a conditional use in a Landmark Site in residential districts. The zoning ordinance currently allows bed and breakfast establishments, offices and reception centers as conditional uses; house museums would be added to this list. The City Council requested that I send a letter to the chairs of the community councils in which a Landmark Site is listed informing them of the proposed change to the ordinance. These community councils include the Avenues, Capitol Hill, Central City, East Central, State Fairpark, Poplar Grove, People's Freeway, Liberty Wells, East Liberty Park and Sugar House. In my letter, I stated that I would be happy to attend one of their meetings and present the proposed zoning text amendment to their community council. I sent the letter on November 9 and asked for a response no later than November 26. To date I have not heard from any of the chairs. Thus, I am requesting that Petition 400-01-17 be forwarded to the City Council for a hearing at your earliest convenience. Attachment: Letter to community council chairs. 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 841 1 1 TELEPHONE: 001.535-7757 FAX: 801-535-6174 NE . i Eo owa SALT \ a Jr°GIT.Y( CORPORA IOi STEPHEN A. GOLDSMITH -... .,, o,�,.,, --+R ... Jd�..� maw Naar. �� ROSS C. ANDERSON PLANNING DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAYOR PLANNING DIVISION BRENT B. WILDE DEPUTY PLANNING DIRECTOR November 8, 2001 Dear Community Council Chairperson: The Salt Lake City Planning Division is in the process of amending the zoning ordinance to allow house museums as a conditional use in a Landmark Site in residential districts. The zoning ordinance currently allows three non-residential uses that the owner of the Landmark Site can pursue through the conditional use process: bed and breakfast establishments,offices and reception centers. The proposed amendment would allow house museums to this list. The intent of the ordinance is to permit uses that can operate on a small enough scale that the surrounding area will not lose its residential character,and to provide an incentive for the preservation of historically significant properties in a way that affords the best protection for an important historic resource. The zoning ordinance allows these non-residential uses in landmark sites only as a last resort to insure preservation and only when it is found that the proposed use will be compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed text amendment is in response to a request by the owner of the Wilford Woodruff house at 1604 South 500 East. Wilford Woodruff was an early Mormon pioneer and a significant figure in Utah history. His home, which he constructed in 1859, is a fine example of early Utah architecture and displays the construction techniques used during the initial settlement years in the state. The current owner would like to use the Woodruff home as a house museum and establish a non-profit organization to assist with the substantial costs of stabilizing the house for an educational resource. The proposal would allow house museums as conditional uses in Landmark Sites in the following residential districts: FR-1/43,560; FR-2/21,780; FR-3/12,000; R-1/12,000; R-1/7,000; R-1/5,000; SR-1; SR-3; R-2; R-MF30; R-MF35; R-MF45; R-MF-75 and R-O. Because Landmark Sites have been designated in your community council area,the City Council has requested that the Planning Division staff notify the appropriate community council chairs of this proposal. If you would like a staff member to present this proposed zoning text amendment to your community council,please notify me by November 26, 2001 at 535-7128. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, - Elizab Giraud, A.I.C.P. Planning Program Supervisor Attachments: "Strike and bold" and clean versions of proposed ordinance. 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH B41 1 1 TELEPHONE: BO1-535-7757 FAX: BO1-535-6174 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2001 (Amending the Salt Lake City Code to allow for house museums as a conditional use of landmark sites in residential districts) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE TO ALLOW HOUSE MUSEUMS AS A CONDITIONAL USE OF LANDMARK SITES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-01-17. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Zoning Code contains various restrictions on the use of landmark sites located in residential districts; and WHEREAS,the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, finds after public hearings before its own body and before the Planning Commission that portions of the Salt Lake City Zoning Code which relate to the use of landmark sites in residential districts should be amended to allow house museums as a conditional use of landmark sites in residential districts, and that such amendments are in the best interest of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Section 21A.24.010.S.2(a) of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 2. Conditional Use Required: Where not otherwise authorized by this title pursuant to part V, chapter 21A.51 of this title as shown in 21A.24.190 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts, landmark sites in any residential district may be used for certain nonresidential uses. a. Uses: Nonresidential uses which may be allowed as a conditional use include: i. Bed and breakfast establishments; ii. Offices; iii. Reception centers.-; and iv. House museums. Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2001. Published: G:\Ordina0l\Amending SLC Code to allow nonresidential use of landmark sites-Oct 25,2001.doc SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2001 (Amending the Salt Lake City Code to allow for house museums as a conditional use of landmark sites in residential districts) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE TO ALLOW HOUSE MUSEUMS AS A CONDITIONAL USE OF LANDMARK SITES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-01-17. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Zoning Code contains various restrictions on the use of landmark sites located in residential districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, finds after public hearings before its own body and before the Planning Commission that portions of the Salt Lake City Zoning Code which relate to the use of landmark sites in residential districts should be amended to allow house museums as a conditional use of landmark sites in residential districts, and that such amendments are in the best interest of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Section 21A.24.010.S.2(a) of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 2. Conditional Use Required: Where authorized by this title as shown in 21A.24.190 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts, landmark sites in any residential district may be used for certain nonresidential uses. a. Uses: Nonresidential uses which may be allowed include: i. Bed and breakfast establishments; ii. Offices; iii. Reception centers; and iv. House museums. Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER Salt tstza C:L; ....... y' rs Date lo— Zs —©l_ (SEAL) By .� �.. . rrt� Bill No. of 2001. Published: G\Ordina0l\Amending SLC Code to allow nonresidential use of landmark sites-Clean-Oct 25,2001.doc EXHIBIT A. Table 21 A.24.190 TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS EXHIBIT B. Table 21 A.44.060F SCHEDULE OF MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS fri • Ll„IL. SAL' 'TAKE ITY-C RPORATI.OI •S C. "ROCKYR" ANDERSON _ � _ MAYO OFFICE OF THE MAYOR COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL 71h TO: Rocky J. Fluhart, Chief Administrative Officer DATE: October 30, 2001 FROM: Lisa R. Romney SUBJECT: City Council update on Resolution NO. 30 of 2001 Regarding Reducing Demand for Electrical Power and Other Forms of Energy STAFF CONTACT: Lisa Romney, Steve Oliver, and Robyn Stanczyk DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution BUDGET IMPACT: Beneficial DISCUSSION: Resolution NO. 30 of 2001 addresses electrical power and other forms of energy. Since the time of adoption, The Salt Lake City Corporation has worked steadily to reduce energy consumption and set a conservation example for residents and businesses. 1. City and County Building Interior Lighting Conversion: As of August 20, 2001 all 90 and 60 Watt Incandescent light bulbs used in interior chandeliers have been replaced by 15 and 25 Watt Compact Fluorescent and Halogen Incandescent lamps. Total annual energy-savings:-$13,98'-1-2-. Annual air conditioning saving: $512.76. Total annual savings: $14,499.88 140%return on initial investment of$10,285.08. Five-year savings projection estimated at $72,499.38. All numbers are estimates. Energy audit performed by Codale Electric. By mid-November, 2001 418 sconce light fixtures will be converted from 300-Watt lamps to 25- Watt Compact Fluorescent bulbs. The numbers for this conversion are not yet complete. Rough estimate of total annual savings: $19,000.00 Estimated return on $3500 investment: Under 6 months. 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH S41 1 1 TELEPHONE: 801-535-7704 FAX: S01-535-6331 ®REcvcEC PAPER 2. Salt Lake City Corporation Response to PowerFoward: In 2001, Governor Mike Leavitt launched PowerForward, a statewide energy conservation campaign. Green, Yellow, and Red Power days indicate level of conservation practices recommended. As of July of 2001 The Salt Lake City Corporation received notification and responded to PowerForward index alerts. All department heads were directed by the Mayor to register to receive notification. The Administrative Assistant for Environmental Relations in the Mayor's Office sent out reminders to department heads and worked with facilities managers to ensure the City altered practices on Yellow and Red Power days. Practices include: reduce energy demand during peak times (2 pm to 8 pm), moderate air conditioning or heat use (seasonal), dim lights and/or turn off unnecessary lighting, notify employees of PowerForward index and recommend they conserve energy at their work stations and homes. 3. Executive Order: Build 100% AFV fleet, reduced petroleum consumption. In September of 2001, Mayor Anderson signed an executive order on 100% Alternative Fuel Vehicle city fleet conversion. This Executive Order applies to all City departments including the departments of Airports, Public Utilities, Public Services, Police and Fire. Among other recommendations, the major points of implementation are: 1. A minimum of 30 percent of the City's annual vehicle purchases should be AFVs, including light- and heavy-duty vehicles. (Note: The policy should apply only to vehicles capable of meeting the City's performance requirements.) 2. An increased fuel economy of 3 mpg by 2005 shall be achieved through super-energy efficient vehicles, fleet efficiency by substituting smaller and lighter-weight vehicles, where appropriate, and reducing VMT. This policy has a large impact on non-renewable energy_consumption.It will serve to create_a___ city fleet that has reduced impact on air quality and is less dependent on foreign oil supply. 4. High Performance Buildings Guidelines: On October 10, 2001 Salt Lake City announced a task force to create and publish High Performance Building Guidelines for the City. Public and private professionals in architecture, landscape architecture, construction, building materials, law, and other related fields will collaborate to establish guidelines. The task force has been confirmed and convened for a preliminary meeting. On November 19, 2001 they begin plenary sessions to complete guidelines. All funding has been secured through December. Additional private funding sources will be found for document production. • Salt Lake City will use High Performance Building Guidelines when constructing or retrofitting city buildings in the future. High Perfoiniance Buildings are designed to reduce resource consumption, heat island effect, and maintenance costs while improving overall building occupant perfoiivance and health. These projects do not need to cost more in construction. All cities' to implement such guidelines have seen considerable financial savings over the lifetime of their buildings. Projects 1-4 are major tasks, ongoing or complete, that the City has been able to accomplish in a relatively short time due to the commitment of city employees to this resolution. FUTURE PLANS and RECOMMENDATION: 1. Washington Square Grounds Lighting Conversion: Similar to interior lighting conversion, all 72 lap posts on Washington Square will be altered to achieve brighter directional light towards the ground and retrofit with energy efficient bulbs. Currently, round fixtures emit light in all directions, unnecessarily wasting light energy. High Wattage Incandescent bulbs have historically been used in such fixtures. These will be converted to Compact Fluorescent or Halogen bulbs, which emit similar quality and quantity of light while consuming less energy. Energy savings are expected to be considerably greater than those achieved on indoor fixtures. Estimated time of completion: Mid-November, 2001 2. Purchase Blue Sky Energy and launch a major add campaign in conjunction with PacifiCorp. Salt Lake City is predominantly coal powered. This energy source is non-renewable and degrades our air quality. Salt Lake City has a responsibility to purchase power from alternative sources in order to set a conservation example to businesses and-residents.-The-City should evaluate the - - purchase of"Blue Sky" energy to achieve this goal. A portion of money saved on City light retrofit projects should be put toward Blue Sky energy. PacifiCorp launched Blue Sky in 2000 to give customers a choice in how their energy is produced and allow them a part in creating demand for renewable energy resources. The program allows customers in Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming to buy "blocks" of renewable energy for $2.95 per month on their electricity bills. Customer investment in Blue Sky is funding the construction of new wind turbines and more than 5 megawatts of wind power. 71-5 SALT rA\ + ffIT CORM©ROCKY J. FLUHART ROSE C. ANDERSON —__ � � � �"� ��� -` MAYOR CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL (1 TO: Rocky J. Fluhart DATE: November 26, 2001 Chief Administrative Officer FROM: Steve Fawcett Lai- Ea Deputy Director, Management Services SUBJECT: Revenue Audit of Traffic School STAFF CONTACT: Richard Anderson, Steve Fawcett DOCUMENT TYPE: Report BUDGET IMPACT: If the City Council chooses to take immediate action there could be a revenue reduction of$93,000. DISCUSSION: Council member Buhler asked if the Traffic School program should be a profit center for the City. Richard Anderson, Revenue Analyst/Auditor,was directed to examine the fully loaded cost of the Traffic School and compare that to the cost per attending participant. He determined that the City does charge more than the cost to the City of the school. He also determined that we charge a county average amount for attending the classes. He further offers points to consider when determining if this School is a proper "profit" center for the City. His complete report is attached. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the City maintain the current fee. 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 841 1 1 TELEPHONE: 801-535-6426 FAX: 801-535-61 9❑ ®Recvceo rnPere Traffic School Cost Analysis Council Member Buhler in a letter to Mr Bob Siciliano dated June 14, 2001 stated he does not believe the Traffic School program should be a profit center for Salt Lake City. Instead, this program should operate on the cost-reimbursement basis. Salt Lake City Administration requested that the Accounting Division perform a full-cost analysis to determine the cost of the Traffic School program. The analysis performed by the Accounting Division determined that the fully loaded cost of the Traffic School program per participant for FY 2001 was $20.67 (total cost of Traffic School, $206,262, divided by the total number of participants, 9,980). Salt Lake City currently charges $30.00 per participant. The cost and associated revenue generated from the Traffic School program is as follows: Revenue Collected ($30.00 * 9,980) $ 299,400 Cost ($20.67 * 9,980) (206,262) Net Revenue Generated $ 93,138 The current fee charged and costs incurred for the program result in Net Revenue of$93,138. In 1996, Salt Lake City set the fee for the Traffic School program based on a benchmark study of other cities in the area. At that time, other cities charged approximately $30.00 per participant. In conjunction with the full-cost analysis, the Accounting Division performed a benchmark study of fees charged in 2001. Accounting notes that the fees have not changed significantly in other cities in the area since the 1996 study. Accordingly, several of the cities contacted indicated that fees would likely increase in the near future. The amounts charged by other cities is noted in the following chart: City Cost Description West Valley $ 30.00 Participant pays Traffic School Fee plus Traffic Citation Murray $ 30.00 Participant pays Traffic School Fee plus Traffic Citation Sandy $ 50.00 Participant pays Traffic School Fee and the Traffic Citation is waived Provo $ 50.00 Participant pays Traffic School Fee and the Traffic Citation is waived West Jordan $ 60.00 Participant pays Traffic School Fee and the Traffic Citation is waived Average $ 30.00 Where participant pays Traffic School Fee plus Traffic Citation Average $ 53.33 Where participant pays Traffic School Fee and the Traffic Citation is waived Salt Lake City $ 30.00 Participant pays Traffic School Fee plus Traffic Citation In discussion with Administrative Enforcement,the current Traffic School cost per participant of approximately $21 is deflated due to the Traffic School class being held in the County Court House. The Court House provides a room for the class and the necessary security personnel (these personnel are already on duty because of Night Court) free of charge. Per Administrative Enforcement, this arrangement will terminate when the division moves to the new building in May 2002, thus increasing the cost per participant. Salt Lake City should implement one of the following recommendations: >= Salt Lake City should adopt a policy to operate the Traffic School program on a cost-reimbursement basis. The City should leave Traffic School fees at the current rate until after Administrative Enforcement moves to the new building and fees can be reassessed. Salt Lake City should adopt a policy allowing the City to generate revenue from the Traffic School program based on the following: • Traffic School is entirely voluntary. • Citizens who elect to attend Traffic School benefit in two ways. First, the citation is entirely removed from the citizens driving record,thereby eliminating any associated points. Second, because the citation is removed, the citizen may benefit by reduced insurance premiums. • Citizens have the option to pay the citation. The City should continue to monitor costs associated with the program. Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board: Initial Appointment Reappointment 1. John Francis 08/16/01 — 12/31/01 From ? - 12/27/04 2. Richard Tyler 08/27/01 — 12/31/01 From? - 12/27/04 3. Karen Cahoon 09/18/01 — 12/31/01 From? - 12/27/04 4. Peter Morgan 11/13/01 — 12/31/01 From? - 12/27/04 John, Richard, Karen, & Peter were all appointed to one-year terms on the new Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board, since the ordinance states that"any faction of a year in the initial appointment shall be considered a full year." If they are reappointed, they would all serve three-year terms expiring the last Monday in December Multi-Ethnic Community Resource Board: Initial Appointment Reappointment Yoshiko Uno 11/13/01 — 12/31/01 From? - 12/26/05 Yo was appointed to this board a few weeks ago. Since she filled a vacancy on this board, if she is reappointed, she would serve a four-year term expiring the last Monday of December. Housing Advisory&Appeals Board: Initial Appointment Reappointment Tom Thorum 10/02/01 — 12/31/01 From? — 12/31/04 Tom was appointed to this board a few months ago. Since he filled a vacancy on this board, if he is reappointed, he would serve until December of 2004. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: March 29, 2002 SUBJECT: 28th Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG); Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG); HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) Funding; Housing Opportunities with Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) Funding STAFF REPORT BY: Michael Sears, Budget & Policy Analyst Document Type Budget-Related Policy-Related Miscellaneous Facts Facts Facts Appropriation HUD awarded the City The proposed A public hearing is scheduled Resolution adopting $4,854,000 in CDBG allocation of these for April 9, 2002 to accept 28th Year funding funding(+ $163,800 in grants follows comment on the proposed and approving projected reallocation previously adopted budgets and Consolidated interlocal funding for a total of Council policy. Plan/Citizen Participation agreement between $5,017,800); Plan. Council work session Salt Lake City and $171,000 in ESG discussions are scheduled for the U.S. Dept of funding; $1,350,000 in April 2, 4, 9 and 16.The Housing and Urban HOME funding; appropriation resolution is Development. $421,000 in HOPWA scheduled for consideration on funding. April 16, 2001 in order to meet the Federal deadline. OPTIONS The Council may wish to consider the following options when reviewing the Mayor's 28th Year CDBG, ESG, HOME and HOPWA recommendations: Option 1 The City Council could agree to schedule the adoption of the Mayor's Recommended 28th Year CDBG, ESG, HOME and HOPWA programs as proposed. Option 2 The Council could consider identifying Council funding priorities and making adjustments to the Mayor's recommendations if the Council's priorities are different than those recommended by the Mayor. BACKGROUND On March 5, 2002, Mayor Anderson presented his proposed 28th Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) budget recommendations to the Council. The 28th Year corresponds to the City's 2002-2003 fiscal year. The Administration has submitted an amendment to the Consolidated Plan and Citizen Participation Plan for the five year period from 2000- 2005 within this packet for the Council's consideration as well. On March 5, 2002, Council staff provided Council Members with a history of the CDBG/ESG/HOME/HOPWA budget process over the last six years, including policy directions and legislative intents that the Council has followed or adopted during that time. The Council had previously discussed and reaffirmed the Council's historic policy directions with the understanding that such policies would be reevaluated during or after the 2000-2001 CDBG/ESG/HOME budget process. The policies were evaluated during the 2000-2001 CDBG/ESG/HOME budget process and the Mayor's recommendations for the 2002-2003 CDBG/ESG/HOME/HOPWA budget appear to be consistent with these policies. The Council set a date of April 9, 2002 to hold a public hearing regarding the proposed CDBG/ESG/HOME/HOPWA budget recommendations and Consolidated Plan/Citizen Participation Plan. Council discussions of the CDBG/ESG/HOME/ HOPWA budget recommendations and Consolidated Plan/Citizen Participation Plan have been tentatively scheduled for April 2nd, 4th, 9th (following the public hearing) and April 16th. The City Council is scheduled to consider a resolution approving the 28th Year CDBG/ESG/HOME/HOPWA budget on Tuesday, April 16, 2002, as HUD must receive the package by May 15, 2002 in order for the City to receive funding by July 1, 2002. The Council is scheduled to consider adopting an amendment to the Consolidated Plan/Citizen Participation Plan on April 16, 2002. MATTERS AT ISSUE /POTENTIAL QUESTIONS FOR THE ADMINISTRATION: The Council may wish to hold a discussion regarding the proposed 28th year CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA budgets. A summary of the proposed budgets and major policy issues for Council consideration follows. Council staff and Administration staff will be available at the briefing to address the Council's questions about the proposed budgets. ANALYSIS AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS: The following information is a brief summary of the proposed 28th Year CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA budgets. The summary includes an analysis of the recommended budgets and indicates where the proposed budgets differ from previous budgets or may not be consistent with previous policy directives adopted by the i'. 'e 2 Council. Council staff has attached the 28th Year CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA recommendations that were provided during the Mayor's address, as well as a comprehensive description of each project that applied for funding. Community Development Block Grant Program- The Administration received applications for $9,463,116 in 28th Year CDBG funding (up from $8,647,701 during the 01-02 cycle). HUD awarded Salt Lake City $4,854,000 in 28th Year CDBG funding, a decrease of $177,000 from the last fiscal year, which, with the exception of year 27 funding, is consistent with a general decrease in CDBG funding over the last eight years. The Administration is proposing to augment HUD's award with $163,800 in funding reallocated from prior years for a total budget of $5,017,800. The difference between funding requested and funding that can be allocated this year is $4,609,116. The total funding awarded and allocated over the past eight years is as follows: • 28th Year (02-03) $4,854,000 (+$163,800 reallocated from contingency=$5,017,800) • 27th Year (01-02) $5,031,000 (+$300,000 reallocated from contingency=$5,331,000) • 26th Year (00-01) $4,791,000 (+$249,279 reallocated from contingency=$5,040,279) • 25th Year (99-00) $4,840,000 (+$150,000 reallocated from contingency=$4,990,000) • 24th Year (98-99) $4,810,000 • 23rd Year (97-98) $4,999,000 (+$220,000 reallocated from contingency=$5,219,000) • 22nd Year (96-97) $5,145,000 • 21st Year (95-96) $5,400,000 • 20th Year (94-95) $5,468,000 The CDBG budget is divided into 12 major categories. A brief analysis of overall proposed funding for each category and how such funding compares to the 27th Year CDBG budget is as follows: 27th Year 28th Year 28th Year 28th Year % Change Category Adopted Applications CDAC Mayor (27th Yr. (2001-02) (2001-02) Recommended Recommended Adopted to 28th Yr. Proposed) Housing $1,595,000 $1,655,000 $1,475,000 $1,260,000 - 21.0% Street Design 30,000 127,000 30,000 40,000 33.3% Streets 200,000 1,043,000 1,043,000 923,000 361.5% Sidewalks 282,500 400,000 250,000 200,000 -29.2% Parks 750,000 2,477,000 481,000 743,000 -0.9% Public Services 801,000 1,471,014 728,100 725,000 -9.5% Building 837,500 801,660 109,900 271,000 -67.6% Improvements Economic 0 440,000 0 0 N/A Development Planning 40,000 228,000 100,000 55,000 37.5% Administration 703,093 737,442 717,442 717,442 2.0°A) Percent for Art 6,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 -50.0% Contingency 85,907 80,000 80,358 80,358 -6.5% TOTAL $5,331,000 $9,463,116 $5,017,800 $5,017,800 -5.9% Page 3 *Community Development Advisory Committee The overall Mayor's Recommended 28h Year CDBG Budget reflects the $177,000 decrease in HUD's award compared to last year, as well as the $163,800 being proposed for reallocation from prior years' funding. Funding for Street Design, Streets, Planning, Administration is recommended to increase over 27th Year funding levels while funding for Housing, Sidewalks, Parks, Public Services (operating support for community agencies), Building Improvements (capital improvements for community agencies), Percent for Art and Contingency is proposed to decrease from 27th Year funding levels. The following synopsis details the major changes between the 27th Year Adopted and 28th Year Recommended CDBG budget by funding category. The Mayor's Recommended 28th Year CDBG budget generally follows the policy directives established by the City Council over the past few years. When reviewing the past funding of CDBG projects, the Council may wish to note that since CDBG funding is not made available to the City until July 1, most capital projects are not actually completed in the funded year. For example, many projects funded in the 27th Year did not actually go out to bid until this spring, and will not be constructed until this summer. While some 27th Year projects have not actually been completed, funds remain obligated for these projects. Housing The City received nine applications for 28th Year CDBG Housing funding in the amount of $1,655,000. The Mayor's recommendations for funding in this category vary significantly from the recommendations made by the Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC). The Mayor and CDAC were, with two exceptions, in agreement on which projects to fund, but differed on the amount of funding. The Mayor recommended increasing the funding to the Community Development Corporation (CDC) - Older Home Rehabilitation and Multi-Ethnic Development Corporation proposals over what was recommended by CDAC. The Mayor recommended against funding for the Salt Lake CDC - Property Acquisition and CDAC recommended against funding for the Salt Lake CDC - Older Home Rehabilitation. The Mayor did recommend an allocation to the HOUSING component of CDBG that was $215,000 less than CDAC recommended. All of the organizations that received CDBG Housing category funding in the 27th Year are recommended for funding in the 28th Year (Neighborhood Housing Services, Salt Lake Community Development Corporation, Salt Lake City Housing and Neighborhood Development Division, Utah Non-Profit Housing, ASSIST, LifeCare, and Multi-Ethnic Development Corporation). The Administration has provided information on the past and projected performance levels of those programs being proposed to receive CDBG Housing funds. This information is available for your reference upon request. Str t D sign Five applications were received for street design projects for a total amount of $127,000. CDAC did not recommend funding for any of the Street Design proposals. The Mayor is recommending that Salt Lake City Corporation Engineering Division be allotted funding in the amount of $40,000 for the design of 1300 South between Montgomery St. and Glendale Avenue. Several of the applications are for design work on private streets that are not part of the public way. The funding allocations for Street Design and Street construction or reconstruction projects are related to the Council's discussion on private streets, which is scheduled for April 4, 2002. Str ets The City received three applications totaling $1,043,000 for this category, which funds street improvements in CDBG-eligible areas. The proposed funding for this category is $923,000, which represents an increase from 26th Year funding. Overall CDBG Street funding has increased from previous years in order to complement the Council's intent to increase the City's efforts in addressing the condition of City streets. The Council may wish to note the following: • Physical Access Ramps (item #1) - Year 27 funding allocation was $200,000, which was their request amount, but previous year allocations and requests averaged $50,000. The Salt Lake City Engineering Division applied for $200,000 in CDBG funding to construct access ramps at various locations in CDBG eligible areas this year, and noted that the increase in its request was due to the increase in the number of requests by City residents who cannot get around freely within their neighborhoods. CDAC recommended that funding be awarded in the amount of $200,000, which is the same as last year. The total for years 23 through 26 was 210,000. The Mayor is recommending that this project be awarded $80,000, which is 40% of what was funded last year. • Glendale Street Reconstruction (item #2) - Year 27 funding allocation was $30,000 for design. CDAC and the Mayor recommend that the full request amount of $535,000 be allocated for construction of Phase 2 of this project. • 600 West between 500 and 600 North Street Improvements (item #3) - This project was designed four years ago with $20,000 in CDBG funds. The application was for $308,000 in anticipated construction costs. CDAC and the Mayor are recommending that this project receive $308,000 in funding. Sid walks The CIP Five Year Plan includes $300,000 per year in CDBG-funded sidewalk replacement. The application for CDBG-funded sidewalk replacement this year was for $400,000, and CDAC has recommended $250,000. However, the Mayor has recommended that $200,000 be awarded to Citywide sidewalk replacement in CDBG- eligible areas. Parks The Mayor's recommended funding for the Parks category represents a reduction of $7,000 or 0.9% decrease over 27th Year funding. The Council may wish to note the following: • Ratio of design to construction - As requested by the CDBG Administrative staff, the Salt Lake City Corporation Engineering Division has included the amount of each Park project that is spent on engineering and design. The Council may wish to ask for information on how these engineering and design percentages relate to industry standards. This was recently discussed at a Redevelopment Advisory Committee meeting. • Cannon Park Improvements (item #1) - Both CDAC and the Mayor have recommended not funding the requested improvements to Cannon Park. The requested amount was $485,000. Cannon Park is located on the east side of the Jordan River between California and 1700 South. This park received $45,000 in year 27 funds. • Riverpark Community Garden Neighborhood (item #2) - The Mayor has recommended funding this project at the requested amount of $10,000. CDAC does not recommend funding this project. Riverpark Community Garden is in the Jordan River Parkway between 500 and 600 South. This park received $10,000 in year 27 funds. • Fairmont Park Improvements (item #3) - The Mayor has recommended funding this project in the amount of$330,000. This amount is less than the requested amount of $400,000. CDAC did not recommend funding of this project. This project will allow for the master planning of this park and the construction of a skate park within the park. The recommended funding did not include enough money to complete the requested master planning of this park or enough to cover the Engineering and Design costs. The application indicated that $40,000 was needed for Engineering and Design. The Council may wish to clarify that the park can be constructed without an appropriation for design and engineering. The request application also indicated that $30,000 was needed to master plan the park. The Council may wish to confirm that the requested amount of$30,000 is sufficient to master plan the park given the fact that there are more amenities in Fairmont Park than other parks in the City. A recent request by the Administration for $60,000 to create an action use plan for Pioneer Park could be used as a funding level gauge. The Council may wish to clarify the difference in funding needed to complete plans for these two parks. Page 6 • Jordan Park residence house remodel (#8) - Neither CDAC nor the Mayor recommended funding for this project. The Mayor's Office, through Youth Programs, may have identified another source of funding to complete this project. The Council may wish to confirm their intent concerning the timing of this project and the intended programming as it relates to the Art in the Park program. The Council may also wish to request confirmation on whether the other source of funds can be used for construction. • Riverside Park playground (item #13) - The Mayor is recommending that the requested amount of $140,000 be appropriated to this project. CDAC did not recommend funding for this project. Riverpark is in the Jordan River Parkway between 500 and 600 South. • Tauffer Park playground (item #16) - CDAC is recommending that the full request an.uunt of $240,000 be appropriated. The Mayor is recommending only the design budget of $22,000 be appropriated. Tauffer Park is located at 300 East and 700 South. A request for this park has also been submitted to the Redevelopment Agency. Public Services The Administration received applications for $1,471,014 in 28th Year funding from thirty-four organizations. According to HUD guidelines, the maximum amount that can be spent per year on public services expenses is 15% of the total award, plus program income. The recommended budget of $725,000 is within the cap of 15% of 28th Year award plus program income, and therefore does not exceed HUD's funding cap. The Public Services" category includes requests from agencies and organizations for operational or administrative support for programs that provide community services. While federal Community Development Block Grant regulations allow a certain amount of funds to be spent for the expansion and improvement of community services, the original intent of the program was to revitalize neighborhoods. In consideration of this intent and in light of limited CDBG funding from the federal government, past Councils have maintained a policy not to increase administrative or operational funding for existing programs or grant operational funding for new programs absent extenuating circumstances. In several instances, the Mayor and CDAC have recommended that agencies receive increased operational and administrative funding, and have indicated that these recommendations were based on extenuating circumstances. The Council may wish to note that cost of living or inflationary increases have not been considered into CDBG funding allocations within recent years. The Council may also wish to note that some of the funding requests within this category are for equipment and supplies, which could be considered more of a capital item than administrative or operating item. 'ige 7 As requested by the Council, Council staff has determined that the ratio of recommended operational/administrative support (Public Services category) versus capital improvements (Public Services Building Improvements category) is 73% operational/administrative versus 27% capital. As mentioned above, however, some of the requests for funding within the Public Services category include some small capital-type items such as equipment or furniture, which could be considered to increase the percentage of capital items being recommended for funding. The ratio for operating to capital was 51% to 49% in Year 27. The Council may wish to note the following: • Asian Association of Utah (item #31 - CDAC has recommended funding $10,000 of the $20,000 requested for administrative and staff support. The Mayor did not recommend any funding for this program. • Boys & Girls Club (item #5) - CDAC recommended $15,000 and the Mayor recommended $20,000. The requested amount was $32,416 for salaries and benefits for the Youth with a Voice program. • Community Health Centers fitem #91 - CDAC recommended $90,600 and the Mayor $85,000 for this program. The requested amount was $150,000 for salaries, benefits and operating expenses to provide primary medical and dental care. • First Step House (item #12) - CDAC recommended $15,000 and the Mayor $5,000 for this program. The requested amount was $35,230 for administrative expense assistance. • Guadalupe Center Educational Programs (item #13) - CDAC recommended $42,000 and the Mayor $40,000 for this program. The requested amount was $44,000 for administrative expense assistance. • LifeCare (item #14) - CDAC recommended $10,000 and the Mayor $0 for this program. The requested amount was $50,000 for salaries, building materials and office expenses for the Security Light and Lock project. • Literacy Volunteers of America (item #151 - CDAC recommended $5,000 and the Mayor $10,000 for this program. The requested amount was $49,108 for salary expenses relating to adult literacy and basic ESL programs. • Neighborhood House (item #16) - CDAC did not recommend funding for this program, the Mayor recommended $15,000. The requested amount was $50,000 for the purchase of two vans to transport children to child day care and adults to day centers. • Our House (item #18) - CDAC recommended $15,000 and the Mayor $20,000 for this project. The requested amount was $165,045 for salaries and operating expenses relating to the Childcare & Family Education Center. Page 8 • Rape Recovery Center (item #21) - CDAC recommended $40,000 and the Mayor $30,000 for this project. The requested amount was $40,150 for salaries and operating expenses relating to the crisis counseling and services provided to victims of sexual assault. • SL Community Action Program (item #23) - CDAC recommended $27,500 and the Mayor $25,000 for this project. The requested amount was $27,500 for salaries for program that supplies emergency food supplies to residents. • SL Community Action Program (item #24) - CDAC recommended $12,500 and the Mayor $10,000 for this project. The requested amount was $12,500 for salaries for program that provides home maintenance and money management. • SL Donated Dental (item #25) - CDAC recommended $21,000 and the Mayor $30,000 for this project. The requested amount was $39,500 for salaries for program that supplies emergency food supplies to residents. • SLC HAND (item #26) - CDAC recommended $0 and the Mayor $9,000 for this project. The requested amount was $18,000 for grant monies to be awarded to community councils for preparing and distributing letters and agendas. Year 27 funding was $10,000. Year 27 was the first time that a request was made for funds for this purpose. • The Road Home (item #29) - CDAC recommended $126,000 and the Mayor $120,000 for this project. The requested amount was $126,000 for salaries and benefits for staff that help shelter residents gain skills to become self-sufficient. • Utah Nonprofit Housing Corporation (item #30) - CDAC recommended $40,000 and the Mayor $30,000 for this project. The requested amount was $40,000 for salaries of agency staff who manage affordable and transitional housing units. • Utah Peace Institute (item #311 - CDAC recommended $0 and the Mayor $10,000 for this project. The requested amount was $25,000 for salaries and operating expenses for programs that assist refugee youth. The Council may wish to request information on how this request relates to the City's existing grant for assisting this group. • Wasatch Community Gardens (item #32) - CDAC recommended $7,500 and the Mayor $10,000 for this project. The requested amount was $15,000 for partial salary expenses for the director of a youth program. • YMCA (item #33) - CDAC recommended $10,000 and the Mayor $15,000 for this project. The requested amount was $18,000 for partial salaries and operating expenses for the after school and summer programs for youth living in homeless shelters. Page 9 Public S rvic s Building Improv m nts Applications for Public Services Building Improvements totaled $801,660 from 14 agencies. CDAC has recommended funding $109,900 of these requests. The Mayor has recommended funding $271,000 of these requests. The Council may wish to note the following. • The Mayor recommended funding for the following programs that the CDAC did not: 1. "and Justice for all" 2. Artspace/Bridges 3. Asian Association of Utah 4. East Central Community Council 5. First Step house 6. Nettie Gregory Community Center 7. Utah Alcoholism Foundation • CDAC recommended funding for the Salvation Army and the Mayor did not. • Neither the Mayor nor CDAC recommended funding for the Children's Museum of Utah. • The following programs where recommended for funding by both the Mayor and CDAC: 1. Rape Recovery Center 2. SLC Hand 3. Utah Alcoholism Foundation (Carpet, blinds, driveway) 4. Volunteers of America The Council may wish to consider whether the funding recommended by the Mayor will result in projects that cannot be fully completed without contingency funding or 29th Year CDBG funding. Council staff can provide additional information concerning each of the programs and intended uses at the briefing on April 2, 2002. Planning Four applications totaling $228,000 were submitted for CDBG funding within this category. CDAC is recommending that the following projects receive funding: Sugar House Business District Small Area Plan, Rose Park commercial node and the Wasatch Front Resource Conservation & Development Council (Parley's Creek Corridor Trail). The Mayor is recommending that SLC Planning be awarded funding for the Sugarhouse Business District Small Area Plan and the National Register study for the Sugarhouse Community. Neither the Mayor nor CDAC recommended funding for a feasibility study for the Wasatch Plunge community recreation center. The Council may wish to note that there are also requests for the Sugarhouse Business District Small Area Plan and Parley's Creek Trail before the RDA. Page I Economic D v lopment Two applications totaling $440,000 were submitted for CDBG funding within this category. The applications were for the CDBG revolving Loan Fund and the North Temple Corridor Economic Revitalization Plan. Neither the Mayor nor CDAC recommended funding for these two projects. Administration (General/City) This year, there was one application for General Administration funding. Neither the Mayor nor CDAC recommended funding. The request was for $20,000 from Utah Issues for administrative support for a program to coordinate homeless plans. For City Administration requests, both CDAC and the Mayor have recommended the full requested amount of $717,442. In year 27 and 26 the Council has agreed with the recommendations of the Mayor and CDAC for this category. P rcent for Art The percent for art budget recommended by CDAC for the CDBG program is proposed to remain at the historical constant level of $3,000. Last year the Mayor proposed increased funding level of $6,000 and the Council funded that recommendation. This year both CDAC and the Mayor are recommended that $3,000 be allocated for art projects. The Council may wish to see the possible art enhancements to City properties that these funds can make and determine if the requested amount is sufficient. Contingency The 28th Year contingency budget is proposed to decrease by $5,539 to $80,358. The Council may wish to note that both the Mayor and CDAC recommended $80,358 for contingency. The Council approved $85,907 in 27th Year contingency. Each year unspent contingency funds are recaptured in a budget amendment and allocated to augment the next year's CDBG award from HUD. The Council may wish to consider this amount if additional funds are desired to fund Council CDBG priorities. Emergency Shelter Grant Program (ESG) — This program is designed to improve the quality of existing emergency homeless shelters, make available additional emergency shelters, meet the costs of shelter operation and provide certain essential social services to the homeless. The Administration received applications for $207,000 in 28th Year ESG funding, a decrease of $100,250 over 27th Year funding requests. The City will receive $171,000 from the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development this year, which represents a 1% increase from 27th Year funding. Total funding for past eight years is as follows: • 27th Year (01-02) $169,000 • 26th Year (00-01) $171,000 • 25th Year (99-00) $172,000 • 24th Year (98-99) $191,000 • 23rd Year (97-98) $134,000 • 22nd Year (96-97) $137,000 • 21st Year (95-96) $197,000 • 20th Year (94-95) $145,000 • 19th Year (93-94) $ 64,000 A limited number of agencies in Salt Lake City operate programs that are eligible for ESG funding. CDAC did not recommend funding for the SL Interfaith Hospitality Network but the Mayor recommended $5,000. All other requests had funding recommendations from CDAC and the Mayor, but in varying amounts. Council staff will review the differences in funding recommendations during the briefing on April 2, 2002. Staff will also review the programs and the intended uses of the funds, during the briefing presentation. Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) - The purpose of the HOME program is to provide funding for the expansion of decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing for very low-income people. Total HOME funding over the past seven years is as follows: • 27th Year (01-02) $1,350,000 • 26th Year (00-01) $1,215,000 • 25th Year (99-00) $1,209,000 (+$151,800 reallocated from contingency=$1,360,800) • 24th Year (98-99) $1,122,000 • 23rd Year (97-98) $1,046,000 • 22nd Year (96-97) $1,071,000 • 21st Year (95-96) $1,048,000 • 20th Year (94-95) $ 974,000 The City received 28th Year HOME applications totaling $1,479,600 from seven agencies plus $135,400 for program administration for a total of $1,615,400. However, the City will only receive $1,354,000 from HUD this year in HOME funds. The Mayor's proposed HOME budget supports the recommendations made by the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board (HAAB) for the allocation of available funds, with the exception of the Family Support Center, which HAAB did recommend for funding ($70,000) but has not been recommended for funding by the Mayor. The Mayor recommended additional funds be allocated to the Neighborhood Housing Services organization for the acquisition of vacant properties in the Fairpark area. The properties would be rehabilitated or developed for first time homebuyers. The Mayor recommended funding Neighborhood Housing Services at $198,600 and HTFAB recommended funding the organization at $128,600. Page i The proposed budget reflects continued funding for Neighborhood Housing Services (decreasing the loan amount it was awarded last year from $175,000 to $150,000) and the Salt Lake City Housing and Neighborhood Development Division ($570,000 which is equal to the funding received last year). Finally, consistent with previous years, $135,400 is proposed for costs for the City Housing and Neighborhood Development Division to administer the HOME program. The HOME program allows up to 10% of total funding to be allocated to program administration, as is proposed in this budget. Both HTFAB and the Mayor recommended the full $135,400 be funded for administrative costs. Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) - The purpose of the HOPWA program is to provide housing assistance and supportive services for low-income persons with HIV/AIDS and their families. The HOPWA Grant program provides assistance through formula allocations to eligible States and metropolitan areas. The Salt Lake City/Ogden Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) now qualifies to receive funding for year 2001-2002 due to the number of HIV/AIDS cases in the MSA. The grant amount is $421,000. The City participates on a Statewide HIV/AIDS Housing Steering Committee to ensure all applications are consistent with the needs identified in the strategy for the MSA. The Steering Committee updated the State HIV/AIDS housing Plan in June 2001. The City has also met with all entities within the MSA to coordinate their recommendations and determine the services needed in their areas. There were nine requests for $835,594 in funding. The recommendations from the HIV/AIDS steering committee and Entitlement City Officials are consistent in that both recommend funding $380,000 towards the program and wanted the additional $41,000 of available funding to be split between the Northern Housing Authorities and CCS Northern Utah. The Mayor has recommended full funding of the available $421,000 between all programs (with the exception of the Ogden Area Community Action Program, which did not receive funding recommendation from any of the parties). cc: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Mayor Anderson, Rocky Fluhart, Jay Magure, Margaret Hunt, David Dobbins, Luann Clark, Sandi Marler, Karen Wiley, Greg Johnson, Gary Mumford Pap, 13 QrP�E"l O'.yO ' U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT • * �hltil*c WASHINGTON.D.C.20410-7000 Li 984N OEVE`O OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR 00 COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT November 20, 2001 Honorable Ross C. Anderson Mayor City of Salt Lake City 451 S. State St. Room 306 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Dear Mayor Anderson: The purpose of this letter is to advise grantees participating in the Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)program of a new policy to reduce future grants when a grantee fails to meet the timely expenditure requirements of the program. As previously indicated in letters, at timeliness conferences, and in one-on-one discussions with grantees administering the CDBG program,the Department has made clear its high priority to reduce the number of entitlement grantees that exceed the regulatory standard for carrying out their program in a timely manner. Under the provisions of 24 CFR 570.902 of the CDBG regulations, a grantee is considered to be timely, if 60 days prior to the end of the grantee's program year, the balance in its line-of-credit does not exceed 1.5 times the annual grant. For currently timely grantees, and that is 85% of you, I congratulate you on your excellent record in providing CDBG funds effectively to principally benefit low- and moderate-income persons. Keep up the good work. The Department, working hand in hand with entitlement communities, has had substantial results over the past several years in reducing the number of grantees in non-compliance with the timeliness standard. Despite our considerable efforts, there is still a significant number of grantees that exceed that standard. In order to remedy this continuing problem, HUD has found it necessary to establish and make public its policy for dealing both with entitlement grantees that are currently in non-compliance with the 1.5 performance standard for timeliness and those that come into non-compliance in the future. HUD will no longer accept promised action, but needs to see actual performance. HUD prefers fostering compliance over sanctions, but will take the necessary steps to institute grant reductions where necessary. Loss of a grant is a serious step, not one to be taken lightly by either the Department or the grantee. It is our intention by announcing this policy now, to put all grantees on notice that HUD is serious about reducing the backlog of unspent CDBG funds. Currently Untimely Grantees HUD will impose the following corrective actions that could reduce future grants over two program years for all currently untimely grantees. Step 1: HUD will partially reduce the next grant of any currently untimely grantee that fails to reach the timeliness standard of 1.5 at their next 60-day test, starting with those grantees with program years beginning May 1, 2002. The grant will be reduced on a graduated basis,ranging from 15%to 30%of the amount in excess of 1.5 times the annual grant, depending on the amount of time between policy announcement and the program year start date, as indicated below. There are two possible exceptions to the reduction for: • Any grantee drawing down funds at a rate that, if continued, would bring it into compliance by the following 60 day test, or • Any grantee where HUD determines that untimeliness resulted from factors beyond the grantee's control. The percentage of reduction by program year start date is as follows: Program Year Start Date %Reduction Program Year Start Date % Reduction May 1, 2002 15% October 1, 2002 30% June 1, 2002 18% January 1, 2003 30% July, 1,2002 21% February 1, 2003 30% August 1, 2002 24% March 1, 2003 30% September 1, 2002 27% April 1, 2003 30% Step 2: If, at the 60 day test the following year, a currently untimely grantee still does not meet the 1.5 standard,the next grant will be reduced by 100% of the amount in excess of 1.5 times the annual grant, except: • Where HUD determines that untimeliness resulted from factors beyond the grantee's control. The above policy applies to grantees that are currently untimely. This letter also establishes HUD policy for dealing with grantees that are currently in compliance with the timeliness standard, but become untimely (newly untimely grantees). Newly Untimely Grantees All newly untimely grantees (grantees with program years starting February 1, 2002 and later) have 12 months, to their next 60 day test, to reach 1.5. Failure to meet the 1.5 standard will cause HUD to reduce the next grant by 100% of the amount in excess of 1.5 with one exception for: • Any grantee where HUD determines that the untimeliness resulted from factors beyond the grantee's control. General Issues Related to Grant Reductions Prior to a grant reduction, each grantee is entitled to an informal consultation as provided for in 24 CFR 570.911 of the CDBG regulations. At that time, grantees will have the opportunity to demonstrate how factors beyond their reasonable control caused significant delays in program implementation and affected their timely performance. The burden on grantees will be to clearly demonstrate with compelling information that the circumstances were truly beyond their control. Grantees should not delay improving their drawdown ratio on the basis that they may meet this criteria, as HUD will not make these determinations until such time as the grantee has not met the standard and is subject to a grant reduction. All grant reductions will be based on the dollar amount in excess of 1.5 times the annual grant. For example, if a grantee's annual grant is $1 million and the 60 day ratio is 1.57,the maximum amount of the reduction is $70,000 (1.57— 1.50= .07 x $1 million=$70,000). As indicated,there may be a pro-ration of that amount for currently untimely grantees. Please note that any grant reduction will affect the amount of CDBG funds available for planning and administration. By law,no more than 20%of any grant may be used for these purposes. If there is a significant grant reduction or a reduction to zero of a new grant,there will be limited or zero CDBG funds to pay the grantee's administrative staff. HUD field office staff is available to provide technical assistance to grantees and to assist with reformatting workout plans to conform to the current policy. Each currently untimely grantee will shortly receive a letter from the HUD field office indicating specifically how this policy affects that individual grantee and what that grantee must do to improve performance sufficiently to avert a reduction. Should you have general questions about this policy, please contact Nelson R. Bregon, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Grant Programs at(202) 708-1506. For information about how this policy specifically affects your community,please contact your local HUD field office. Sincerely, -„G.w /49 ce(' Roy A. Bernardi Assistant Secretary Cc: Mr. Frank McCrady City of Salt Lake City MAR 282002 CDBG APPLICATION REVIEW Project Project Name No. Criteria Criteria Rank (1 low - 10 high) No. 1 Community needs met by program/project 2 Sustainability of program 3 Use of partners in program or project 4 Number of persons who benefit Number of feet of infrastructure improvements Number of housing units 5 Tie to Consolidated plan goals 6 Budget data accurately portray project 7 Past year performance using CDBG funds or risk of new program (minus) 8 New administrative costs 9 Program located in City 10 Timeliness Total score CDAC Member name Date completed CDBG Applications (Engineering Division) Priority List 1. Tauffer Park Playground 2. Riverside Park Playground 3. Sherwood Park Playground 4. Riverside Drive Streetscape 5. Fairmont Park 6. 17th South Jordan River Park 7. Roberta LaConia Parking Lot 8. Jordan Park Pavilion 9. Jordan Park Residence 10. Warm Springs Restroom 11. Poplar Grove Pavilion 12. Riverside Park Playfields 13. Riverside Park Parking Lot 14. Peace Garden Entrance—Jordan Park 15. Glendale Park Tennis Courts 16. Sugar House Islands Monuments This project is also being submitted by the Sugar House Community neighborhood Tuesday,April 2,2002 City Council Agenda This information was submitted by the Utah Peace Institute pertaining to the Council' s discussion on CDBG programs 1 1 1. 1 1 FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAMS MAYOR ANDERSON'S RECOMMENDED BUDGETS 1 2002-2003 1 1 I CD Cs * * * * ** * X . * * * ** ��� ► -�� * t * s t ♦ 1 * y ,1 ;SM\ t 1 ' _A:Zhu NH. t• 6,, t,,2r‘ • T CDBG: Uniting Communities Across America 1 1� ' Salt Lake City Federal Grant Application Process Salt Lake City receives federal funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development for four grants. The grants are Community Development Block Grant(CDBG), Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME), Emergency Shelter Grant(ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids ' (HOPWA). A brief description of the grant and the dollar amount allocated is listed below. ' Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Program The CDBG grant was established as a "bricks and mortar" grant to help cities improve housing, public facilities and infrastructure for low- and moderate-income persons. This is the 28th year Salt Lake City has ' received CDBG funds. In order for a project to be eligible for CDBG funding it must meet one of three national objectives and be an eligible activity. To meet the national objective,the project must benefit low- and moderate-income persons, prevent or eliminate slum or blight, or meet urgent conditions that pose a ' serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community. Eligible activities include acquisition and disposition of real property, public facility and infrastructure improvements, clearance activities, public services, housing rehabilitation, home ownership assistance, micro enterprise assistance, t economic development, and planning activities. Projects under the public service category cannot exceed 15% of the total grant awarded to Salt Lake City. The administrative and planning categories cannot exceed 20%of the total grant. ' Salt Lake City received$4,854,000 of CDBG funds. HOME Investment Partnerships Program The HOME program is a federally funded program that provides funding to eligible applicants to strengthen ' public-private partnerships to expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing. Eligible applicants include non-profit organizations,for-profit entities, nonprofit community housing development organizations, and public agencies. The HOME program requires applicants to provide a 25% non-federal ' match. The HOME program also requires that 15%of the grant funds be awarded to a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO). Salt Lake City has two approved CHDO agencies—Salt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services and Utah Nonprofit Housing Corporation. The administrative ' category cannot exceed 10%of the total grant awarded to Salt Lake City. . Salt Lake City received$1,354,000 of HOME funds. Emergency Shelter Grant(ESG) Program The Emergency Shelter Grant program is a federally funded program that provides funding to improve the quality of existing shelters for homeless populations,to help meet the operating costs of homeless shelters, to increase the number of homeless shelters and to provide essential social services to the homeless. ' Recipients must match the grant on a one-to-one basis with other funds. Salt Lake City received$171,000 of ESG funds. 11. Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids (HOPWA) ' The HOPWA program is a federally funded program that was established to assist persons with HIV/AIDS and their families. Applicants can be a nonprofit organization,for profit entity or governmental housing — ' agency. The organization must(1) be organized under State or local laws, (2) have no part of its net earnings inuring to the benefit of any member,founder,contributor, or individual; (3) have a functioning accounting system that is operated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or have designated an entity that will maintain such an accounting system, and (4) have among it purposes significant activities related to providing services or housing to persons with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or related diseases. No more than 7%of the allocated grant amounts can be used for administrative costs by each organization. These funds are allocated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to be used in the tri-county area of Salt Lake, Davis and Weber Counties. This is the only grant where funds are required to be spent in areas outside of Salt Lake City. ' Salt Lake City received$421,000 of HOPWA funds. Application Process The grant application process began in June 2001 with a notice being published in the newspapers and notices mailed to community councils, non-profit agencies, interested individuals etc. The application deadline for submission of all materials was August 3, 2001. Interested individuals and organizations submitted applications as follows: Grant Number of applications CDBG 97 , HOME 6 ESG 7 HOPWA 8 ' Total 118 Applications were screened for compliance with federal requirements. Several CDBG applications were ' disqualified and the applicants notified. CDBG and ESG grant applications were reviewed by the city Community Development Advisory ' Committee (CDAC) and recommendations developed for the Mayor and City Council to consider. The city Housing Trust Fund Board reviewed HOME applications,while the State HIV/AIDS Committee and representatives from entitlement cities reviewed the HOPWA applications and made recommendations for the Mayor and Council. A public hearing was held on July 17, 2001 at the City& County Building hosted by the CDAC committee to hear from the community regarding general community development and housing needs. Notices were posted in the two local newspapers and were mailed to a community development mailing list. Comments received were noted and included in the city's report to the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2 I IA public meeting was held on November 5, 2001 at Edison Elementary School to receive public comment regarding the CDBG applications received. Notices were posted to the two local newspapers and were I - mailed to a community development mailing list to encourage the public to attend.Applicant representatives were there to answer questions. Comment cards were completed and deposited with city staff regarding projects supported by the public individuals. These comments were compiled into a ranking Idocument that CDAC reviewed during its deliberative process. Mayor Anderson reviewed the applications and has made his recommendations regarding which I applications are funded and for how much, given a smaller amount of these funds than last year. The Council will now have the opportunity for reviewing the applications and CDAC's and Mayor's recommendations and making the final decisions that will be funded for the 2002-2003 fiscal year. IEach year Salt Lake City is required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)to submit a one-year Action Plan. This is an annual update to the Consolidated Plan,which is adopted every I three to five years.The Consolidated Plan outlines and defines the needs of the community and low-and moderate-income neighborhoods. It identifies target areas and establishes goals,objectives and strategies for meeting the identified needs over the specified period.The one-year Action Plan is developed to address Isolutions to the needs identified. Grant funding is awarded based on submission of the Annual Action Plan. I I. I I I I ill I I I ISALT LAKE CITY MAYOR ANDERSON'S FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS IFOR FEDERAL GRANTS FOR 2002-2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT - 28th Year IAPP. PROJECT SPONSOR AND TITLE AMOUNT NO. HOUSING PROGRAMS II ASSIST, Inc. - Emergency Home Repair $325,000 3a Salt Lake CDC-Administration 70,000 3c Salt Lake CDC-Older home rehabilitation 100,000 I 4 Multi-Ethnic Development Corp. -Housing rehabilitation 20,000 5 LifeCare (SHHIP) -Critical Home Repair Project 30,000 6 Neighborhood Housing Services (NHS) - Revolving Loan Fund 75,000 7 Salt Lake City-Housing Match Fund 90,000 I 8 Salt Lake City-Low& Moderate Income Housing Rehabilitation 550,000 Total Housing Recommendations 1,260,000 I 2 STREET DESIGN PROJECTS Salt Lake City- 1300 South between Montgomery and Glendale 40,000 Total Street Design Recommendations 40,000 I 1 STREET CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS SLC-ADA Physical Access Ramps 80,000 2 SLC-Reconstruct Montgomery St. between California & Glendale 535,000 lie 3 SLC-Reconstruct 600 West between 500 North and 600 North 308,000 Total Street Construction Recommendations 923,000 SIDEWALK PROJECTS I Salt Lake City-Sidewalk replacement program 200,000 Total Sidewalk Recommendations 200,000 I PARKS PROJECTS 3 Riverpark Community Garden improvements 10,000 4 Fairmont Park plan and skate park construction 330,000 11 Riverside Drive streetscape improvements 150,000 I 13 Riverside Park playground replacement 140,000 15 Sherwood Park playground replacement 91,000 16 Tauffer Park playground replacement 22,000 ITotal Parks Recommendations 743,000 PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAMS OR PROJECTS 5 Boys&Girls Club-Youth with a Voice 20,000 I 6 Boys& Girls Club-Capitol West 34,000 7 Catholic Community Services-Weigand Resource Center 45,000 9 Community Health Centers-Primary medical &dental care 85,000 I 10 Crossroads Urban Center-Emergency Food Pantry 14,000 11 Family Support Center-Crisis Nursery 5,000 12 First Step House-Substance abuse program 5,000 13 Guadalupe Center-Early Learning Center 40,000 I 15 Literacy Volunteers of America-Adult literacy & ESL Program 10,000 16 Neighborhood House-Van purchase 15,000 It. 18 Our House- Day care center 20,000 19 People Helping People-Employment mentoring for low-income parents 15,000 I 20 Prevent Child Abuse-Child abuse prevention program 8,000 I 21 Rape Recovery Center-Crisis Intervention Services 30,000 22 SL Community Action Program-Housing Outreach Rental Program 35,000 _ 23 SL Community Action Program-North West Emergency Food Pantry 25,000 24 SL Community Action Program-Tenant Maintenance Project 10,000 25 SL Donated Dental-Dental services for homeless & low-income persons 30,000 26 Salt Lake City HAND-Neighborhood Self-Help Grant 9,000 III27 Salt Lake City Police-Crime Prevention programs 75,000 28 Salt Lake City Police-Mobile Neighborhood Watch 10,000 29 The Road Home-Community Shelter for homeless individuals &families 120,000 I 30 Utah Nonprofit Housing Corporation -Manage &develop affordable 30,000 housing 31 Utah Peace Institute-Young Refugees of Utah for World Peace 10,000 32 Wasatch Community Gardens-Youth & Community Gardens 10,000 I 33 YMCA-After school and summer enrichment program 15,000 Total Public Services Recommendations 725,000 15% Cap on Public Services Category 728,100 PUBLIC SERVICE BUILDING IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 1 "and Justice for all" -Telecommunications systems 90,000 2 Artspace-Furnishings for Institute for Art& Imagination 10,000 I 3 Asian Association-Parking lot and roof repairs 20,000 5 East Central Community Council - 10th East Senior Center landscaping 50,000 6 First Step House-Transitional housing parking lot repair 9,000 7 Nettie Gregory Center-Miscellaneous improvements 4,000 8 Rape Recovery Center-Windows and stucco improvements 15,000 11 Salt Lake City HAND-Special Contingency Fund 10,000 12 Utah Alcoholism Foundation -kitchen remodel 10,000 13 Utah Alcoholism Foundation -Carpet, window coverings, parking lot 8,000110 improvements 14 Utah Food Bank-Storage racks 30,000 15 Volunteers of America- Parking lot& landscaping improvements, signs 15,000 I and awnings Total Public Services Building Improvement Recommendations 271,000 PLANNING PROJECTS I 1 Salt Lake City-Sugar House community study for historic nomination 25,000 2 Salt Lake City-Sugar House business district small area plan 30,000 Total Planning Recommendations 55,000 I CITY ADMINISTRATION SLC-Seven administrative functions necessary to mange the grant 717,442 Total Administration Recommendations 717,442 PERCENT FOR ARTS SLC-Funding for art projects on City-owned property 3,000 I CONTINGENCY SLC-Funding for unanticipated cost overruns on construction projects 80,358 TOTAL RECOMMENDED AMOUNT 5,017,800 I ANTICIPATED GRANT AMOUNT 4,854,000 AVAILABLE FOR REALLOCATION 163,800 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 5,017,800 I I IHOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) - 11th Year I APP. PROJECT SPONSOR AND TITLE AMOUNT NO. 1 Neighborhood Housing Services—acquire &develop housing 150,000 2 Neighborhood Housing Services (CHDO)—acquire &develop housing 198,600 I 3a Community Development Corp. —first time home buyer assistance 50,000 3b Community Development Corp. —construct new housing 100,000 4 Utah Nonprofit Corp. —renovation of Jacob Apartments (transitional) 150,000 I 5 SLC Housing & Neighborhood Development. —Home rehabilitation, 570,000 financial assistance programs 7 City administration of HOME program 135,400 I TOTAL RECOMMENDED AMOUNT 1,354,000 TOTAL GRANT AVAILABLE 1,354,000 I EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANT (ESG) - 13th Year IAPP. PROJECT SPONSOR AND TITLE AMOUNT NO. Ii The Road Home—Operational support for homeless shelter 90,000 2 SLC Comm. Action Program—rent& mortgage assistance 18,000 3 Catholic Comm. Services—Marillac House—Equipment & improvements 5,000 4 Catholic Comm. Services—St. Mary's Home for Men—Operational 5,000 I. support 5 Valley Mental health —Safe Haven—Maintenance &supplies 23,000 6 YWCA—Residential Self-Sufficiency Program 25,000 7 SL Interfaith Hospitality Network—Operational support for homeless 5,000 Ishelter TOTAL RECOMMENDED AMOUNT 171,000 I TOTAL GRANT AVAILABLE 171,000 IHOUSING OPPORTUNITITIES FOR PERSONS WITH AIDS (HOPWA) —2nd Year I APP.NO. PROJECT SPONSOR AND TITLE AMOUNT 1 Housing Authority of Salt Lake City—Housing assistance & admin. 117,000 2 SL Comm. Action Program—Housing assistance&admin. 149,500 I 4 Utah Nonprofit Housing Corp. —Housing assistance 17,500 5 Utah AIDS Foundation —Support services &admin. 10,000 6 Ogden Housing Authority—Housing assistance &admin. 40,000 I 7 Davis County Housing Authority—Housing assistance &admin. 40,000 8 Catholic Comm. Services— Housing assistance &admin. 40,000 9 Kenyon Consulting —Consulting to coordinate 3-county area 7,000 I TOTAL RECOMMENDED AMOUNT 421,000 TOTAL GRANT AVAILABLE 421,000 TOTAL ALL GRANT REQUESTS $6,963,800 S • • Mayor's CDBG Recommendations ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 0% 0% PERCENT FOR ART PLANNING ADMINISTRATION 0% 1% 14% CONTINGENCY PUBLIC SERVICE BUILDING 2% IMPROVEMENTS - 5% PUBLIC SERVICES HOUSING 14% 26% STREET DESIGN 1% PARKS 15% SIDEWALKS STREET CONSTRUCTION 4% 18% =Nu il mm mo mo mil 1=E 1=11 mom I. miis min mmi um CDBG HOUSING COMPARISON 3,000,000 2,500,000 - - - 2,000,000 — 1,500,000 - - - - - - - 1,000,000 l 500,000r 1 i—— — — III0 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 CDBG YEAR ❑Request ■Approved 1 i M NM O W - - OM MN I 11=11 MMIi N • CDBG STREET CONSTRUCTION COMPARISON 6,000,000- 5,000,000- -- -- 4,000,000- 3,000,000- 2,000,000 — — — 1,000,000--- I H 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 CDBG YEAR 13 Request■Approved ons Nob am mm II= MIN MOO MN MINI Min= IMO — CDBG PARKS COMPARISON 3,500,000 3,000,000- - - - I 2,500,000--- 2,000,000 1,500,000-- - - 1,000,000-- 500,000 0 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 CDBG YEAR ICI Request•Approved Ism III 11=1 NM NM OM MEI MEI ir ONE MINI UM MI NM MIMI. 1 =I CDBG PUBLIC SERVICES COMPARISON 3,000,000 2,500,000 - 2,000,000 - - 1,500,000 - -- 71 1,000,000 500,000 — J,?' — — II 0 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 1 CDBG YEAR 0 Request •Approved IN= -i _ Mil s MO =I IMO nolINO _ CDBG BUILDING IMPROVEMENT COMPARISON 2,000,000 1,800,000 - -- 1,600,000- 1,400,000 ..... 1,200,000- - -- -- 1,000,000 800,000 600,000- - , U- 400,000-- 200,000 - 11- 0 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 CDBG YEAR 0 Request■Approved IIIIM - ■w Illllllll N NM l IMI lllllllll 1 NMIMIMS NE MN EMI -�- MINI 0 3/4/0 SALT LAKE CI DBG PROGRAM 1 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council ':". ,iO,_-•,HOY iK. v I3 it a, r r < ., P t`p fi �`:sg rr`ga a• Q r in`» ,. i ,,'a al 'iP 1 ASSIST Inc Operational support and funds to provide - 27th 350,000 350,000 350,000 325,000 Emergency Home Repair and emergency home repair to eligible low income 26th 350,000 Accessibility&Community Design residents. Repairs include plumbing, heating& 25th 305,000 electrical, leaking roofs. Provide design 24th 305,000 assistance for mobility issues. 23rd 305,000 22nd 305,000 Others 2,497,500 Total 4,417,500 3a Community Development Operational support for nonprofit housing 27th 90,000 90,000 90,000 70,000 Corporation program to implement programs which address 26th 60,000 Administration current housing needs. 25th 70,000 24th 70,000 23rd 70,000 22nd 70,000 Others 569,147 Total 999,147 3b Community Development Purchase or rehabilitate properties to provide 27th 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 Corporation low income housing. Others 0 Property Acquisition Total 100,000 3c Community Development Acquire&rehabilitate older homes at favorable 27th 150,000 150,000 0 100,000 Corporation prices either through HUD foreclosures or Others 0 Older Home Rehabilitation private sales,and then rehabilitate the homes for Total 150,000 eligible families. 4 Multi-Ethnic Development Operating funds for program that identifies, 27th 10,000 40,000 10,000 20,000 Corporation develops and operates housing properties for 26th 5,000 Low and Moderate Income Housing very low to moderate income populations. Others 0 Rehabilitation Total 15,000 5 LifeCare Operational support of agency that provides 27th 30,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 Critical Home Repair Project minor home repairs for seniors and disabled 26th 30,000 citizens. Repairs include minor plumbing, 25th 15,000 electrical, replacing furnace filters, etc. 24th 15,000 23rd 15,000 22nd 15,000 Others 66,500 Total 186,500 3/4/02 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM 2 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations — Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council 6 SL Neighborhood Housing Operational support and funds to provide low- 27th 175,000 175,000 175,000 75,000 Services interest loans to people who may not qualify for a 26th 75,000 Revolving Loan Fund traditional bank mortgage. Funds also used for 25th 75,000 blended mortgages, home improvement loans 24th 75,000 and a rehabilitation project. 23rd 75,000 22nd 75,000 Others 505,000 Total 1,055,000 7 SLC Housing and Neighborhood Funds to be used to assist nonprofit housing 27th 65,000 100,000 100,000 90,000 Development entities as match money for new transitional and 26th 100,000 Housing Match Fund permanent housing grants. 25th 100,000 24th 100,000 23rd 100,000 22nd 100,000 Others 365,000 Total _ 930,000 8 SLC Housing and Neighborhood Operational support and funds to provide 27th 600,000 600,000 600,000 550,000 Development residential home rehabilitation assistance to 26th 600,000 Low and Moderate Income Housing bring properties up to code, provide financial 25th 600,030 Rehabilitation assistance and to construct new homes in target 24th 650,000 areas or for income eligible residents. 23rd 650,000 22nd 650,000 Others 7,087,965 Total 10,837,995 9 Housing Total 1,655,000 1,475,000 1,260,000 0 Percent of Total 17.5% 29.4% 25.1% — —110 ... ... ... —I ... so - ft - - - I- - - I_ I_ 3140 ' SALT LAKE CF0BG PROGRAM 3 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28T8YEAR(2002'2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Proj ct Name Year Amount Amount COAC Mayor Council ~��� N���� _ ' '-- - ' - -_- - -_- -- _ �~~�- '---__�-� -~_,_.�~ � ~' ` ~.-`, ~. -� �~ ' 1 Fenmay Avenue Neighborhood Design improvements to private street to 15'000 0 O Fonmmy Avenue located otG35 include curb,gutter, drainage improvements South between 12O0 and 1238East and street resurfacing. Carried over from last years applications. 2 GLCEnQineehnQ Design street improvements toinclude ' 40.000 O 40.000 13OO South between Montgomery St. sidewalk, curb,gutter,drainage and Glendale Ave. improvements,traffic calming, paMkothp landscaping and street reconstruction. 3 SLC Redevelopment Agency Design street improvements to include curb, 30'000 D O Ardmore Place between 2UOand gutter and street resurfacing. 3OOVVost 4 Strong Court Neighborhood Design improvements ho private street ho 12.080 D 0 Strong Court located ot85O East 4UU include curb,gutter,drainage improvements South and street resurfacing. Carried over from last year's applications. 5 UtmbnaNeiQhbmrhood Design improvements to street toinclude 30,000 30.000 O Ubohno Drive, Utahna Circle, Emery curb,gutter,drainage improvements and Street south uf California Ave. street resurfacing. 5 Street Design Total - 137,000 30.000 40.000 O Percent ofTotal 1.3% 0'6% 0.8% 3/4/02 SALT LAKE C0YC0BG PROGRAM 4 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS F0R28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount COAC Mayor Council �N�����, 1 SLCEnQinmmrin8 Construct access ramps ot street corners in 27th 200.000 200.000 200.000 80.000 Physical access ramps eligible areas for individuals who use 26th 60.000 wheelchairs,walkers,canes, and strollers. 25th 50.000 24th 50.000 23vd 50.000 22nd 40.000 Others 128.720 Total 578.720 2 SLCEnQineehng Construct street improvements toinclude 27th 30.000 535.000 535.000 535.000 Glendale Street Reconstruction street reconstruction, curb,gutter and 28th 440.000 Phase 2-Montgomery Street sidewalk, pmrksthp landscaping,traffic 25th 85.000 between California Ave. and calming and storm drainage improvements. 24th 30.000 Glendale St. (27th Year was for daoign.) (25th&26th Year were for conoLmntinn] (24th Year was for deoiOnj Total 585.000 D SLCEnQineehng Reconstruct 6OU West tn include street 24th 20.000 308'000 308.000 308.000 6UO West between 5U0 and 000 pavement,curb,gutter,sidewalk, podknthp Others 0 North (NHS project) landscaping and necessary drainage. (24th Year was for daoignj Tno| 20.000 3 Street Construction Total 1'843,000 1.043'000 923,000 D Percent ofTotal 11.0% 20.8% 18'4% ME NMI III= EMI NMI RIM INN IMMI BIM MN MINI SIM MN BIM IIIIMIA011011 IIIIII 3/4/0 SALT LAKE CI DBG PROGRAM IP5 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council NO:VPAw ,4 4 SLC Engineering Replace deteriorated sidewalk and curb and 27th 282,500 400,000 250,000 200,000 Sidewalk Replacement Program gutter in CDBG eligible areas. 26th 280,000 25th 200,000 24th 200,000 23rd 200,606 22nd 400,000 Others 2,234,000 Total 3,797,106 Sidewalks Total 400,000 250,000 200,000 0 Percent of Total 4.2% 5.0% 4.0% 3/402 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM G FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project N Year Amount Amount COAC Mayor Council ' 2 Ke�thJenaen Grodeandoonhnuroitefbrimpmxomenbnand 27th 45.O0D 48S.��� V � -' � - Cannon Park improvements'East drainage, install sprinkler system,curb,gutter side of Jordan River between and sidewalk, paths and lighting, California and 17DOSouth landscaping, playground equipment and pavilions. Grading&fill's25.0OO Irrigation system-s15D.00D Landscaping'$1OO.UUO Lighting-$4O.00O Concrete curb, gutter,walkways'$40.UUU Playground'$50.00U Picnic pavilion'*8U.00U 3 Riveqymrk Community Garden Improvements ho parkway including canoe 27th 10.000 10'000 O 10.000 Neighborhood ramp, grading and landscaping. Rivorpark Community Garden' Plants-$3.0OO Jordan River Parkway between 50O Materials for ramp&fill'$4.00O and GO0South Equipment rental-s3.0OO 4 SLC2n8ineering Master plan the park ho include the swimming ' 400.000 O 330.000 Fairmont Park plan and pool and proposed skate park, relocation of construction tennis and volleyball courts and increase parking. Construct skate park. Master plan'$30.00U Engineering and Design'*4O.O0O Skate park construction-$33U.00U 5 SLCEnQineedng Resurface 4of8 tennis courts and replace 58'000 U O Glendale Park tennis court lights on2courts. improvements Construction'$53.00D Engineering&design'*5.0OU G SbCEngineerinQ Improve existing pavilion. 73.000 D O Jordan Park pavilion Construction'$84.OUU Engineering&design'$O.0OU Construction contingency'$3.00O B SLCGnWineerinQ Remodel existing residential structure for Arts 75'000 U O Jordan Park residence house in the Park program. remodel Construction'*G8.UO0 ' Engineering&design'$7.00U M lop um m on um i me MI MN - al r MO M M - - mem me 3/4/02 SALT LAKE Cl7rCDBG PROGRAM 7 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Nam Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council 9 SLC Engineering Replace restroom, rebuild parking lot, regrade 500,000 0 0 Jordan River Park improvements play fields, add new soccer field and irrigation system. Restroom-$125,000 Soccer field-$100,000 Irrigation system-$130,000 Parking lot-$100,000 Engineering&design-$45,000 _ 10 SLC Engineering Upgrade existing pavilion, remove fireplace and 70,000 0 0 reroof. Poplar Grove Park pavilion Construction-$64,000 Engineering&design-$6,000 11 SLC Engineering Provide new sidewalk on the east side of 150,000 150,000 150,000 Riverside Drive Streetscape-700 Riverside Drive connecting to existing bridge North to 1050 North on the east side over Jordan River. Provide grading and of Riverside Drive between the erosion control, landscape and irrigation Jordan River and existing curb& system. gutter. Construction-$145,000 Engineering&design -$5,000 12 SLC Engineering Provide new parking lot on north side of park 43,000 0 0 Riverside Park parking lot adjacent to improved tennis courts, landscape and revise irrigation system. Construction-$40,000 Engineering&design-$3,000 13 SLC Engineering Remove and replace playground facility and 140,000 0 140,000 Riverside Park playground surrounding surfaces. Construction-$127,000 Engineering&design-$13,000 14 SLC Engineering Replace hedges with sod and replace chain 22,000 0 0 Roberta LaConia parking lot link fence with block wall. improvements Construction-$20,000 Engineering&design-$2,000 15 SLC Engineering Remove and replace playground facility and 91,000 91,000 91,000 Sherwood Park playground surrounding surfaces. Construction-$83,000 Engineering&design-$8,000 16 SLC Engineering Remove and replace playground facility and 240,000 240,000 22,000 Tauffer Park playground surrounding surfaces. Construction-$218,000 Engineering&design-$22,000 3/4/02 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM 8 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council 17 SLC Engineering Replace existing restroom. 120,000 0 0 Warm Springs Park restroom Construction-$110,000 Engineering&design-$10,000 _ 15 Parks Total 2,477,000 481,000 743,000 0 Percent of Total 26.2% 9.6% 14.8% allI♦�r ft - - - - - - mil um 3�02� ����L���CIT DBG PROGRAM S FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-20O3) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council PU AUAIARO 1 Adventure Center Tuition for children tootten day r attend for - ' ---- ' ----- - ' ���OO O O Elevate toEducate infants, preschool and school-age children, also after-school programs. 2 African American Task Force Administrative support for program that 24th 10.000 56'000 0 U Byrd House'Beat the Street teaches youth life, social, educational skills. 23nd 10.000 22nd 10.000 Others 20.000 Total 50.000 3 Asian Association ofUtah Administrative and staff support for program 27lh 15.000 20,000 10.000 O Refugee Counseling Service that provides individual and family [Vhenu 0 counseling in native languages for mental health, substance abuse and domestic violence. Total 15.000 4 Boye&Girls Club Salaries&benefits for van driver and 30,896 O O Transportation Sensation atPoplar purchase of15 passenger van for program Grove which transports youth members to Boys& Girls Club. Van driver wages&benefits'$3.8AS 15 passenger van'$27.DU0 8 Boya&Girls Club Salaries and benefits for program that 27lh 25.000 32.416 15.000 20.000 Youth With oVoice teaches life and social skills, provides 20th O recreational opportunities and leadership 25th 30.000 skills for at-risk youth, at3 facilities at4G0S 24th 43.000 Concord, A88ESugonnuntDr..and 5G7NL 23nd 43.000 300North. 22nd 43.000 Others 159.000 Total 343.000 G Boyo&Girls Club Salaries and benefits for after-school program 27lh 34.000 34,000 34.000 34.008 Capitol West Club that provides core Club activities Uu area youth 26Vh 34.000 who are low income at-risk children. 25th 34.000 24th 34.000 23nd 34.000 22nd 34.000 Others 542.000 Total 748.000 T Catholic Community Services Salaries, benefits&maintenance for program '27th 45.000 66,871 45.000 45.000 Weigand Resource Center that provides day shelter for homeless. 26th 50.000 Includes showers, lockers, personal hygiene items, mmi|/neooage/phone service,health 3/4/02 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM 10 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council 8 Children's Museum of Utah Salaries,operating expenses&supplies for 26th 7,500 7,500 0 0 Parent Enrichment Series program that teaches parents how to be proactive in their children's cognitive, emotional, social and physical development. (26th Year was for admission program) Total 7,500 9 Community Health Centers Salaries, benefits,operating expenses&prof. 27th 85,000 150,000 90,600 85,000 Primary medical and dental care services for program that provides medical 26th 90,000 and dental care to uninsured and low-income 25th 10,000 persons. Total 185,000 10 Crossroads Urban Center Partial salary for director of program that 27th 12,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Emergency Food Pantry provides food,counseling and emergency 26th 12,000 funds to low-income and homeless persons. 25th 10,000 24th 10,000 23rd 60,000 22nd 60,000 Others 87,000 Total 251,000 11 Family Support Center Partial salaries for houseparents for program 27th 5,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 Family Support Crisis Nursery which provides crisis nursery services to 26th 0 children who are at risk for abuse. 25th 5,000 24th 5,000 23rd 5,000 22nd 5,000 Others 10,000 Total 35,000 12 First Step House Salary for data clerk,computer equip., 27th dna 35,230 15,000 5,000 Administrative assistance supplies, consultant programmer for program 26th 3,500 which provides substance abuse treatment 25th 16,500 services, both residential and outpatient. 22nd 25,000 Others 92,000 Total 137,000 13 Guadalupe Center Partial salary of director,operating expenses, 27th 42,000 44,000 42,000 40,000 Educational Programs and partial funding for laptop computers and 26th 40,075 Early Learning Center Preschool van for program that provides pre-school 25th 38,000 Project services to low-income children. 24th 38,075 23rd 20,000 22nd 20,000 Others 40,000 Total 238,150 ��� NM IL �• llllll g - amme I= ill IONMI MNNM OM IMMI NM OM MN OMl�� Mil 3/4/00 SALT LAKE CI CDBG PROGRAM 11 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council 14 LifeCare Salaries, bldg. materials&office expenses 27th dna 50,000 10,000 0 Security Light and Lock Project for program that provides home safety 26th 0 information, inspections and modifications for 25th 30,000 100 to 150 homes. 24th 30,000 (Prior year funds went to SLC Police Dept.) 23rd 30,000 22nd 30,000 Others 306,000 Total 426,000, 15 Literacy Volunteers of Salary for program assistant&operating 27th 5,000 49,108 5,000 10,000 America expenses for program that addresses adult 26th 5,000 Adult literacy and ESL literacy and basic ESL programs. Others 49,000 Total 59,000 16 N ighborhood House Funding for two vans to transport low income 27th 90,000 50,000 0 15,000 Neighborhood House children to child day care and adults to day 22nd 10,000 center. (Previous funding was for building improvements.) Total 100,000 17 Ouelessebougou-Utah Alliance Partial salary,operating expenses and 13,000 0 0 Education trunks for 2nd Grade supplies&partial travel for program to provide education in social studies and cultural awareness to 2nd grade students in eligible elementary schools. 18 Our House(Formerly Homeless Partial salaries&operating expenses for 27th 70,000 165,045 15,000 20,000 Children's Foundation) program which provides child care,education, 26th 10,900 Childcare&Family Education Center case management for children and adults 25th 9,520 from shelters and low-income areas. 24th 22,294 23rd 12,000 22nd 12,000 Total 136,714 19 People Helping People Operating expenses and workbooks for 27th 15,000 37,988 15,000 15,000 People Helping People program that provides employment mentoring 26th 21,405 to low-income single parents. Total 36,405 20 Prevent Child Abuse Utah Supplies and equipment for child abuse 27th 8,000 22,530 8,000 8,000 Child Abuse Prevention prevention curriculum taught in 26th 16,400 eligible elementary schools. (Previous funding was for Good Touch/Bad Touch program) Total 24,400 3/4/02 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM 12 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Requ st Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council 21 Rape Recovery Center Partial salaries&operating expenses for 27th 32,000 40,150 40,000 30,000 Sexual Assault Crisis Intervention program that provides crisis counseling and 26th 18,060 Services services for victims of sexual assault. 25th 15,000 24th 15,000 23rd 15,000 22nd 10,000 Others 40,000 Total 145,060 22 SL Community Action Partial salaries for program which 27th 35,000 37,000 35,000 35,000 Program assists SL families to obtain safe and 26th 37,000 Housing Outreach Rental Program affordable rental housing. 25th 37,000 24th 37,000 23rd 37,000 22nd 37,000 Others 337,500 Total 557,500 23 SL Community Action Partial salaries for program which 27th 27,500 27,500 27,500 25,000 Program provides emergency food supply to low- 26th 27,500 Northwest Emergency Food Pantry income residents. 25th 27,500 24th 27,500 23rd 27,500 22nd 27,500 Others 256,200 Total 421,200 24 SL Community Action Salaries for housing specialist for program 27th 12,500 12,500 12,500 10,000 Program which provides home maintenance and 26th 12,500 Tenant Maintenance Project money management training to low-income 25th 12,500 households. 24th 12,500 23rd 12,500 22nd 12,500 Others 50,000 Total 125,000 25 SL Donated Dental Equipment used for program that provides 27th 21,000 39,500 21,000 30,000 Dental Services dental care to homeless and uninsured low 26th 15,350 income persons. 25th 17,247 24th 16,000 Total 69,597 26 SLC HAND Provide grants to eligible community councils 21st 10,000 18,000 0 9,000 Neighborhood Self-Help Grant for preparing and distributing letters and agendas. Total 10,000 NMI IIIIII%- - MO - I• I i Zl 1 i OM M I - NM = M I 3/4/0 SALT LAKE CIWDBG PROGRAM 13 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council 27 SLC Police Department Partial salaries for specialists for program that 27th 75,000 79,780 75,000 75,000 Crime Prey ntion teaches citizens crime prevention concepts 26th 74,920 and coordinates programs and police 25th 66,253 services. 24th 66,253 23rd 66,253 22nd 66,253 Others 805,353 Total 1,220,285 28 SLC Police Department Supplies and equipment for program that 27th 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Mobile Neighborhood Watch trains and coordinates mobile neighborhood 26th 10,000 watch groups. 25th 10,000 24th 10,000 23rd 10,000 22nd 10,000 Others 38,000 Total 98,000 29 The Road Home(formerly Salaries&benefits for front-line staff for 27th 126,000 126,000 126,000 120,000 Traveler's Aid) program which helps residents gain skills 26th 126,000 Supportive services to become self sufficient while staying at 25th 126,000 shelter. 24th 126,000 23rd 126,000 22nd 126,000 Others 918,000 Total 1,674,000 30 Utah Nonprofit Housing Partial salaries for agency that manages 27th 40,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 Corporation affordable and transitional housing units. 26th 40,000 Manage and develop affordable 25th 40,000 housing properties. 24th 40,000 23rd 40,000 22nd 40,000 Others 80,000 Total 320,000 31 Utah Peace Institute Partial salaries&operating expenses for 25,000 0 10,000 Young Refugees of Utah for World program which assists refugee youth in Peace transition to USA,teaches&promotes leadership and community outreach. 3/4/02 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM 14 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council 32 Wasatch Community Gardens Partial salary for director for youth program 27th 12,000 15,000 7,500 10,000 Youth and Community Gardening that teaches responsibility, respect through 26th 12,000 Programs hands-on gardening experiences and for the 25th 12,000 adult program that provides opportunities for 24th 12,000 low-income residents to grow fresh 23rd 12,000 vegetables and herbs. 22nd 12,000 Others 66,000 Total 138,000 33 YMCA Partial salaries&operating expenses for the 27th 10,000 18,000 10,000 15,000 After-school and Summer program that provides after-school and 26th 33,000 Enrichment Program summer programs for youth living in Total 43,000 homeless shelters. 34 Community Development Partial salaries&operating expenses for 40,000 0 0 Corporation program that collects and stores building Affordability Project materials for home construction. 34 Public Services Total 1,471,014 728,100 725,000 0 Percent of Total 15.5% 14.5% 14.4% 15%Cap on Public Services 728,100 728,100 728,100 728,100 Difference -742,914 0 3,100 728,100 1 IMO 1111,IIIII NIB MB IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII MI 21 NB NM NM NM am gm am mg aii � 31400 SALT LAKE C14CDBG PROGRAM 15 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 20TH YEAR ) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount COAC K8oymr Council i J , 1 "and Justice for all" Funding for telecommunications hardware, 27th 210.000 90'700 0 90.000 Technology enhancements to cable and network for legal advocates thmd Community Legal Center provide outreach,education and assistance bo low and moderate income individuals. Hardware'$2Q.5OO Cable&network'$58.7O0 Computer switches-*4.5OUTotal 210.000 2 Artopmce/BridQee Funding for furnishings for dance studio 25th 250.000 50.000 O 10.000 Institute for Art and Imagination fooi|iUnn. Dance floor, mirrors,finiuhingu'$25.DOO Cupboards,work surfaces, divider'$25.0OO 25th Year was for infrastructure improvements Total 250.000 3 Asian Association ofUtah Funding for repair and structural anchoring of 23nd 38.000 25.000 O 20.000 Parking lot and roof repair roof on building ag1588G. Major,and develop parking lot on vacant lot at18OUGMajor. Manager salary'$1.O00 Construction'*15.000 Rehabilitation'$O.80OTotal 38.000 4 Chi|dnon'e Museum ofUtah Funding to establish o technology enrichment 22nd 25.000 300.000 0 O Teen Enrichment Center center to develop project-based video, photographic,audio,weboito. radio programs. Building contract'$1OO.00O Associated costs'$50.00O Technology for center'$15U.00UOthers 317.250 (Prior funds were for VVoetooh Plunge b|dgj Total 342.250 5 East Central Community Funding bo redesign and install new 59'425 O 50.000 Council landscaping in front nf the senior center, 1[»h East Senior Center including sprinkler system,sidewalks,and landscaping improvements |ow'moinbenoncop|ontingn. Construction-$43.525 Engineering&design'$3.50O Demolition'$5.QO0 Administration'$2.5OO Contingency'$4.OUU 3/4/02 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM 16 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Nam Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council 6 First Step House Funding for driveway and parking lot 26th 3,500 9,500 0 9,000 First Step House transitional renovation for their transitional housing 25th 16,500 housing project. 22nd 25,000 Grading,filling&capping-$7,500 Engineering,design,contingency-$2,000 (Prior years funds were for mattresses, Others 92,000 carpet, stairways&other improvements.) Total 137,000 7 Nettie Gregory Community Center Funding for interior and exterior renovations: 27th 40,000 46,000 0 4,000 Community Center improvements floor tile,drywall and paint,weather-strip 26th 20,000 install gas water heater,exterior pole lamps, 25th 25,000 replace parking lot. Others 9,000 Floor tile in upstairs office-$2,500 Total 94,000 Repair and paint office wall-$500 Weather-strip rear exit doors-$100 New water heater-$500 3 exterior pole lamps-$7,000 Outdoor drinking fountain-$600 Asphalt parking lot-$25,000 Fees-$3,800 Engineering&design-$3,800 8 Rape Recovery Center Funding for new windows&stucco on their 26th 28,344 35,800 35,800 15,000 Building improvements& building. renovation Resurface exterior with stucco-$15,000 26 windows-$20,800 9 Salvation Army Remove old flooring and replace in bathroom 27th 40,000 8,683 8,600 0 Renovating bathrooms and shower facilities. 25th 20,885 Remove&replace flooring-$8,683 23rd 10,000 Others 39,755 Total 110,640 11 SLC HAND Funding for grant to nonprofit organizations 27th 7,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Special Contingency Fund when they experience unforeseen emergency repairs to their facilities. Total 7,000 Illiil OP ION Mill Eli Mil all Mil - I - .. .. - .. .. .. .. .. MO 11111,INN NMI 111111 1111111 111111 MS 11111 r .... .... 111111 Ell NMI NM NEI MO MIN 3/4/02 SALT LAKE CITWDBG PROGRAM 17 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council 12 Utah Alcoholism Foundation Funding to renovate kitchen, replace floor 104,200 0 10,000 Women&Children's center- coverings,construct access ramp and kitchen remodel reconfigure bath for ADA.209 Douglas St. (1250 E and 200 S) Kitchen-$48,100 Carpet-$2,800 ADA ramp-$6,200 ADA bathroom-$18,000 (untitled)-$10,000 Engineering&design-$6,000 Demolition-$4,800 Fees, permits,contingency-$8,300 13 Utah Alcoholism Foundation Funding for new carpet,window coverings 13,960 8,000 8,000 House of Hope-carpet, blinds, and driveway repair. 1006 E 100 South SLC driveway Carpet-$2,650 Blinds and drapes-$4,674 Driveway repairs-$3,000 Engineering&design-$1,136 Demolition-$2,000 Permits,fees, contingency-$500 14 Utah Food Bank Funding for racks to store and organize food 31,500 31,500 30,000 Pallet racks warehouse for the Utah Food Bank. 15 Volunteers of America Funding for reconstruction of front and east 27th 103,000 16,892 16,000 15,000 Adult Detoxification Center parking lots, install 3 awnings, purchase and 26th 64,000 install 2 signs and provide landscaping 24th 29,700 around building. 23rd 29,100 Construction-$13,846 Others 24,348 Engineering&design-$3,046 Total 250,148 14 Building Improvement Total 801,660 109,900 271,000 0 Percent of Total 8.5% 2.2% 5.4% 3/4/O ��0[������"���� ����R��"� 18 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2803) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council ��� pip ����mp- 2 � 1 SLCp|mnninQ Conduct |udyoftheSugorhnuooaua�for ' || | —' - -- i,000 - —` ----- 5ugorhouoe Community study for nomination to the National Register ofHistoric National Register Districts. 3 SLCP|onnin8 Conduct a study ho review transportation 45.000 45.000 30.000 SugarhouoaBuuineoo District needo, parking, street modifications, Small Area Plan obeetocope plan and design options, etc.for the SugoMhnuue Business District. 3 SLCp|mnning Conduct m study to review the feasibility of 85,000 0 O Wasatch Plunge community renovating the Wasatch Plunge building for recreation center feasibility study use ao community recreation center. 4 GbC9/annin0 Conduct o study to review the infrastructure 25.000 25.000 0 Rose Park commercial node improvements to the commercial node atQOO infrastructure improvements'QOU West and 1OOU North such ao bus stops, West approximately between 1000 uidewo|kn, omoown|ko.street lighting, North and AOONorth oignage. street trees and landscaping, etc. 5 Wasatch Front Resource Develop a master plan for the Parley's Creek 30,000 30.000 O Conservation&Development corridor with the objectives ofreconnecting Council communities, providing access to Master planning and concept destinations and multiple recreation development for Parley's Creek experiences. Hidden Hollow ho Fairmont Park Corridor Trail then along railroad corridor to City limits sd5OU East. 5 Planning Total 228.000 100,000 55.000 O Percent ofTotal 3'4% 2.0% 1'1% | IIIIIII MIllo MN ION NMI IIIII NM 1111111 NMI Z OM .OM ii. Mil MN NM INIO MN 3/4/02 SALT LAKE CITPCDBG PROGRAM 19 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations — Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council EMEI11V1 % '4311C iiiiiiiiiiiiiiikA4 ,"„ ' ,:', ' .)an , - MiteCtit . I1NJP34, "fili1SIISUU17f 1 SLC Community&Economic Funding for loans to small business owners 400,000 0 0 Development for expansion and growth. CDBG Revolving Loan Fund 2 Westside Alliance Funding for salaries&administrative support 40,000 0 0 North Temple Corridor Economic for Alliance staff and to develop&distribute Revitalization Plan a Westside Business Directory. Economic Development Total 440,000 0 0 0 Percent of Total 4.2% 0.0% 0.0% 3/402 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM 20 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR ) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Name Year Amount Amount COAC Mayor Council a����� 1 Utah Issues Adminioto�xeuuppo�for o new program that 20.000 n - 0 - Continuum nf Care Coordinator would coordinate homeless plans and services throughout the County,and write annual grant. General Administration Total 20.000 0 0 D 1 City Att Offic e Funding for functions necessary tn 27th ' 55.432 .eS -- ' -- --' ------------~--'-~- 32 55,432 _.432 administer CDBG grant. 26th 55,432 uom 55.432 24tU 53.300 23vd 53.300 22nd 53.300 Others 383.380 Total 709.558 2 Community Affairs Funding for functions necessary tu 27th 41.998 41'338 41.908 41.088 administer CD8Ggrant. 26Vh 41.998 25th 41.098 24th 40.605 23vd 40.695 22nd 40.805 Others 371.090 Total 610.160 3 Environmental Assessments Funding for functions necessary ho 37lh 55.840 55'640 55.640 55.840 administer CDBGgrant. 26th 55.840 25th 55.840 24th 53.500 23vd 53.500 22nd 53.500 Others 258.800 Total 586.220 4 Finance Funding for functions necessary to 27lh 43.080 43,680 43.880 43.880 administer CDBGgrant. 26»h 43.080 25th 43.680 24th 42.000 23nd 42.000 22nd 42.000 Others 266.440 Total 523.480 i EMI - - =II MIN OM OM MO INIII r 11111O IIIIIII MI MO Ell MINI IIIII Ell IIMII 3/4/02 SALT LAKE CITWDBG PROGRAM 21 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations - Project Name Year Amount Amount CDAC Mayor Council 5 Housing&Neighborhood Funding for functions necessary to 27th 408,345 422,694 422,694 422,694 Development administer CDBG grant. 26th 408,345 25th 408,345 24th 324,500 23rd 324,500 22nd 324,500 Others 2,183,500 Total 4,382,035 6 Office of Neighborhood Services Funding for functions necessary to 27th 49,711 49,711 49,711 49,711 administer CDBG grant. 26th 28,398 25th 50,476 24th 49,627 23rd 49,627 22nd 49,627 Others 346,200 Total 623,666 7 Property Management Funding for functions necessary to 27th 48,287 48,287 48,287 48,287 administer CDBG grant. 26th 48,287 25th 48,287 24th 46,430 23rd 46,430 22nd 46,430 Others 130,410 Total 414,561 City Administration Total 717,442 717,442 717,442 0 Total Administration 737,442 717,442 717,442 0 Percent of Total 7.8% 14.3% 14.3% Planning&Administration Total 965,442 817,442 772,442 0 20%Cap 970,800 970,800 970,800 970,800 Difference 5,358 153,358 198,358 970,800 3/4/02 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM 22 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 28TH YEAR(2002-2003) # Applicant Name Project Description Previous Grants Request Funding Recommendations Project Nam Year Amount Amount CDAC�,, Mayor Council " �+,.. m� :to s; r 7 Y.,.., A'.. -`�1.rv.P,a^,NeT 1 SLC Percent for Art Funding to provide enhancements to city 27th 6,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 properties through decorative pavements, 26th 3,000 railings,sculptures,fountains,and other 25th 3,000 works of art. 1%of project costs is allocated to art projects. Percent for Art Total 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 ' % Percent of Total 0.0:.% 0.1%.•,u^," zHar 0.1% .agt ® � ��� d , « ; x , IOW: ;k,,, S tt • l � , ,a. „ # : .,r ��" .° t" a�"u " �� 0,, am` wESv'.;'•�.r v,4•‘. 1 Contingency Funding set aside to cover unanticipated cost 27th 85,907 80,000 80,358 80,358 overruns on funded projects. 26th 87,608 25th 59,712 Contingency Total 80,000 80,358 80,358 0 Percent of Total 0.8% 1.6% 1.6% �. tea`„ '"•:b•,oa� :i a °�"rt.,. �"r� a ,,.,5'��a.•,��r .'�`a"�'��'I'"rw. �1; ,^'" ���'c•.i{,Y:'d^'„�rt',�,',..a�';, TOTAL REQUESTED 9,463,116 5,017,800 5,017,800� 0 ANTICIPATED GRANT AMOUNT 4,854,000 4,854,000 4,854,000 4,854,000 AVAILABLE FOR REALLOCATION 163,800 163,800 163,800 163,800 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 5,017,800 5,017,800 5,017,800 5,017,800 DIFFERENCE -4,609,116 0 0 4,854,000 ME JI)111111 IL - - MEP IIIIII Nu No mo mil mi I ISALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT I DESCRIPTIONS OF PROPOSED PROJECTS 1 28th YEAR (2002/2003) ITable of Contents ISection Project Category Page No. Requested $ I 1. Housing 2 $1,655,000 2. Street Design 4 127,000 3. Street Construction 4 1,043,000 I 4. Sidewalks 5 400,000 5. Parks 5 2,477,000 6. Public Services 7 1,471,014 I7. Public Services Building Improvements 14 801,660 8. Planning 16 228,000 9. Economic Development 17 440,000 lip 10. General Administration 18 20,000 11. City Administration 18 717,442 12. Percent for Art 18 3,000 I13. Contingency Fund 18 80,000 I TOTAL REQUESTED $9,463,116 GRANT AMOUNT ANTICIPATED 4,854,000 I PROJECTED AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR REALLOCATION 163,800 TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR PROJECTS 5,017,800 I I I le I I I 1. HOUSING REQUESTED AMOUNTS 1.ASSIST, Inc. - Emergency Home Repair 350,000 I 218 E. 500 So. Funding for administrative support for a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for four staff positions for a I program that provides grants for housing repairs of up to$1500 per year to homeowners and $250 to renters, who are very low or fixed income households, elderly or disabled individuals. Repairs include plumbing, heating and electrical, replacement or repair of leaking roofs, and installation of accessibility ramps and grab bars. Last year, Assist completed 350 Emergency Home Repair jobs at approximately I $770 per job and made 75 accessibility modifications to households and nonprofit organizations in Salt Lake City. Assist also provides architectural design, community planning and development assistance to other nonprofits and community organizations. Funds requested will complete approximately 350 I Emergency Home Repair projects and provide 75 households with accessibility alterations and design services. Community design assistance will be provided to approximately 25 nonprofit or community groups. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 3a. Salt Lake Community Development Corp. (CDC) -Administration 90,000 I 501 East 1700 South Funding for administrative support for a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for eight staff positions, office I supplies, conference expenses, consultant fees, postage, utilities and printing costs for a program that provides affordable home ownership opportunities to low-and moderate-income families throughout Salt Lake City. This organization's primary focus is providing affordable homeownership opportunities to low- and moderate-income families through new construction, rehabilitation, down payment assistance, I financial assistance, counseling and education, and information and referral. The funds requested are necessary for the proper management of these activities. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 3b. Salt Lake CDC -Property Acquisition 100,000 la 501 East 1700 South These funds will purchase land that can be developed as affordable homeownership for low-income families. This activity would help address the homeownership needs expressed in the city's Community I Housing Plan. The CDC has built 22 new homes for low-income families in the City since 1993. Since vacant land is scarce in the city, when opportunities become available, it is critical that the CDC act quickly to purchase the property. If the properties are large enough to accommodate more than one home, funds may also be used for infrastructure and site development. After the purchase of the land, I the CDC will work with community residents, public officials, lending institutions, and City staff, to determine the most efficient and cost-effective homes to be sold to low-income families. Homes will be erected ranging in size from 1000 to 2000 square feet. They will also range from two bedrooms/one bath I to four bedrooms/two baths. Cost of homes will range between $90,000 and $125,000. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 3c. Salt Lake CDC -Older Home Rehab Project 150,000 I 501 East 1700 South Funding will be utilized to purchase older homes at favorable prices through HUD foreclosures or private sales. These homes will be then be rehabilitated and sold to income eligible families. This program not I only preserves the city's housing stock for low-income families, it helps revitalize neighborhoods. The CDC has successfully rehabbed 27 homes in Salt Lake City. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 4. Multi-Ethnic Development Corp. -Operating Funds 40,000 136 S. Main St., Suite 715 This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for two staff positions, for a program that provides affordable housing services to low-income persons. Operational I support for the coming year will allow MEDC to continue to serve as a provider of affordable housing in the Salt Lake City area. The mission of MEDC is to serve the community by developing, owning and managing clean, safe and affordable housing for very low-to moderate-income populations of the41°1 2 I Wasatch Front, and to advocate for the rights and dignity of all people in need of affordable housing. MEDC strives to provide housing opportunities for the city's ethnically diverse populations. MEDC ' purchases and rehabilitates neglected or disreputable multi-and single-family properties in residential neighborhoods to provide rental housing for persons at or below 44% of the area median income. Application filed by nonprofit organization. ' 5. LifeCare (SHHIP)—Critical Home Repair Project 50,000 Community Services Council Program 1025 South 700 West This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for eight staff positions, for a program that provides minor home repairs (minor plumbing, electrical, furnace filters, etc.) for seniors and disabled citizens. Funding is also requested for supplies, postage, printing costs, employee training, building equipment and materials, vehicle expenses and equipment maintenance. ' This program is expected to serve 479 residents through 582 jobs in 335 homes located in Salt Lake City. LifeCare Services focuses specifically on those home repairs and maintenance components that do not require building permits or need to be done by professional contractors. These services preserve the ' city's housing stock through early detection and intervention of problems as well as the livability of the homes. LifeCare Services provides assistance with minor critical home carpentry, electrical repairs, plumbing repairs, minor accessibility modifications, appliance repair and interior/exterior painting for the low-income, elderly and disabled population. Application filed by nonprofit organization. ' 6. Neighborhood Housing Services (NHS) 175,000 ' 622 West 500 North Funding for administrative support for a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for seven staff positions, for a program that provides low interest home improvement loans to those who might not typically qualify for traditional bank mortgage loans. These loans are provided for the purpose of home and commercial rehab, concentrating on code or safety related problems first. In addition, these funds assist with land acquisition of problem properties for development of affordable housing, in-fill housing and blended mortgages. NHS now offers first mortgage opportunities and when a low-interest CDBG second mortgage is extended in conjunction with an NHS first mortgage, the overall monthly payment becomes ' more affordable and allows more people the opportunity for home ownership. NHS has successfully provided nearly 400 loans totaling over$7 million in housing stock improvements. The target area encompasses the Guadalupe, Jackson, Onequa and Capitol Hill neighborhoods in the northwest section ' of the city and the Glendale neighborhood in the southwest section of the city. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 7. Salt Lake City-Housing Match Fund 100,000 ' 451 So. State Street, Rm. 406 Funding to be used by Salt Lake City Housing and Neighborhood Development as match money for new transitional and permanent housing grants being issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban ' Development(HUD). Past projects include funding for Jacob Apartment building acquisition for individuals with HIV/AIDS; a new facility for the Volunteers of America detoxification transitional housing; special purpose group home facility for the disabled; and a housing facility for chronically mentally ill individuals in conjunction with Valley Mental Health. Application filed by Salt Lake City Housing and Neighborhood Development. 8. Salt Lake City -Low and Moderate Income Housing Rehabilitation $600,000 ' 451 So. State, Rm. 404 Funding for administrative support for salaries, taxes and benefits for ten staff positions, office supplies, mileage, training, travel, telephones, and computer support for a program that provides residential rehabilitation including technical assistance (property inspections, preparation of cost estimates, ' recommendation of contractors and supervision of construction), financial services(minimum payment/low interest loans, property appraisals, loan limit analyses, credit and title searches, and loan application preparation), monitoring services, construction for the elimination of slums and blight and prevention of blighting influences, and the deterioration of property, neighborhood and community ' 3 facilities for persons of low/moderate-income, within CD eligible areas of the city. These funds will also be used to oversee the rehabilitation of 110 housing units, 30 first time home buyer projects, project management for several CDBG funded public service building improvement projects and management of a$22,000,000 mortgage portfolio. Application filed by Salt Lake City Housing and Neighborhood Development. TOTAL HOUSING REQUESTS $1,655,000 2. STREET DESIGN REQUESTED AMOUNTS I 1. Fenway Avenue Street Design 15,000 1200 to 1238 East Fenway Avenue (635 South) Funding to design street improvements to Fenway Avenue to include street reconstruction, installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk and storm drainage. Fenway Avenue is currently a privately owned street but will be dedicated to the city before construction begins. There are 16 properties affected by this request and all property owners have signed the street dedication petition for this project. This project has been presented to the East Central Community Council where it received unanimous support. Application filed by Fenway Avenue resident. 2. Glendale Area Street Reconstruction, Phase II 40,000 1300 South (Montgomery Street to Glendale Avenue) Funding to design street improvements to include 2000 linear feet of street reconstruction, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, traffic calming features and improvements to storm drainage.1300 South is a public street owned by the city. There are 51 properties adjacent to this project. 1300 South is listed on the 20- year CIP needs list of local streets needing reconstruction. Application filed by Salt Lake City Engineering Division. 3.Ardmore Place Design 30,000 1111 Ardmore Place between 200 and 300 West Funding to design street improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalk and drainage along this publicly owned street. Application filed by the Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency. 4. Strong Court Street Design 12,000 342 to 362 Strong Court(850 East) Funding to design street improvements to Strong Court to include street reconstruction, installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk and storm drainage. Strong Court is currently a privately owned street but will be dedicated to the city before construction begins. There are 12 properties affected by this request and all property owners have signed the street dedication petition for this project. Application filed by Strong Court resident. 5. Utahna Drive Design 30,000 Utahna Drive, Utahna Circle, Emery Street south of California Ave. Funding to design street improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalk and drainage along this publicly owned street. Application filed by the neighborhood residents. i TOTAL STREET DESIGN REQUESTS $127,000 3. STREET CONSTRUCTION REQUESTED AMOUNTS 1. Physical Access Ramps 200,000 111 Citywide in CD eligible areas Construction costs for approximately 125 access ramps at various locations in CD eligible areas, to 41111 provide access to grocery stores, parks, bus stops, senior centers, community centers, libraries and 4 I Ipublic services for individuals who use wheelchairs, walkers, canes and strollers. Without these services, many individuals would remain homebound and unable to utilize available services. There are approximately 4,000 locations within CD eligible areas in need of accessibility ramps in order for Salt I Lake City to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) requirements. The Mayor's Task Force on Accessibility will assist in the determination of priority ramp locations. Salt Lake City Engineering Division filed application. I2. Glendale Area Street Reconstruction, Phase 2 535,000 Montgomery Street between California Ave. and Glendale Street Funding to construct street improvements to include street reconstruction, installation of curb, gutter, I sidewalk, park strip landscaping, traffic calming features and improvements to storm drainage. Montgomery Street is a public street owned by the city. There are 51 properties adjacent to this project. Montgomery Street is listed on the 20-year CIP needs list of local streets needing reconstruction. Project Ireceived design funds from 27t"Year CDBG.Application filed by Salt Lake City Engineering Division. 3. Reconstruct 600 West- NHS project 308,000 600 West between 500 North and 600 North I Reconstruct 600 West to include removal and replacement of street pavement and installation of curb and gutter, park strip landscaping and necessary storm drainage improvements. This project is needed to upgrade neighborhood and streetscape appearance; improve access to abutting properties and I residential structures; provide streetscape amenities to allow for area housing redevelopment; and to improve street drainage and eliminate street ponding. This project was designed with $20,000 in CDBG funds during 24th Year. Application filed by Salt Lake City Engineering Division. ITOTAL STREET CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS $1,043,000 ka 4. SIDEWALKS REQUESTED AMOUNTS 1. CDBG Sidewalk Replacement 400,000 I Citywide in CD eligible areas Funding for replacement of cracked and displaced sidewalk, curb and gutter. This project will improve low-and moderate-income neighborhoods by providing improved pedestrian safety, access and upgrading neighborhood appearance. A 1998 inventory of deteriorated sidewalk in CDBG areas I identified approximately $4 million worth of remaining needs. Community councils will assist in the determination of priority sidewalk replacements. Application filed by Salt Lake City Engineering Division. I TOTAL SIDEWALK REQUESTS $400,000 5. PARKS REQUESTED AMOUNTS I2. Cannon Park Development 485,000 Jordan River Parkway and California Avenue to 1700 South I Funding to develop the east side of the Jordan River Parkway between 1700 South and California Avenue. Specific work to be funded includes: grading the site; installation of irrigation system; installation of curb and gutter along Riverside Drive; concrete pathways for pedestrians; installation of lighting; parking lot development; landscaping; playground equipment; and picnic pavilions. Application filed by I resident of the area. 3. Riverpark Community Garden 10,000 I 500-600 South at the Jordan River Funding to complete improvements to a portion of the Jordan River to include landscaping, creating canoe ramp and pier. This project will benefit wildlife, enhance neighborhood aesthetics, provide better I S river access, raise property values for the entire area and provide a much-needed positive quality to the community. Application filed by resident of the area. 4. Fairmont Park Plan and Construction 400,000 , 700 East 2361 South Funding to master plan the park to include the existing swimming pool, relocation of tennis and volleyball courts, development of a skate park in the former swimming pool and increase parking. Funding to include construction of a new skate park facility. Application filed by City Engineering Division. 5. Glendale Park Tennis Court Improvements 58,000 1200 West 1700 South Funding to re-surface 4 of 8 tennis courts and replace lights on two courts. Application filed by City Engineering Division. 6. Jordan Park Pavilion 73,000 1 900 West 1000 South Funding to improve the existing pavilion to make it a long-lasting facility. Application filed by the City Engineering Division. 8. Jordan Park Residence House Remodel 75,000 1060 South 900 West Funding to remodel existing residential structure to allow it to become used for the Arts in the Parks youth Program. This would include removal of existing floor coverings and to paint existing wood floors; to upgrade the heating and air conditioning system; and to do minor adjustments to interior walls, door, cabinets and to paint the same. Application filed by City Engineering Division. 9.Jordan River Park Improvements 500,000 1700 South 1150 West(Jordan River) Funding to replace restroom, rebuild parking lot, re-grade play fields, add new soccer field and irrigation system. Funding to install automatic irrigation system to replace old and deteriorated system in need of continual maintenance and repair. Funding is also requested to upgrade soccer/play fields at this 14 acre site, that are in need of reconditioning, and to create one new soccer/play field. The additional soccer/play field will provide an additional place for a youth sport in great demand. This project would allow this park to continue to serve the public and keep maintenance costs down. Design of this project was funded with $25,000 CDBG funds during 25th Year. To remodel/reconstruct existing restrooms to meet ADA Safety and Accessibility requirements in a heavily used park. The project would include individual stalls to accommodate persons with disabilities and make the restrooms safer and easier to maintain. The existing facility is old and constantly in need of maintenance and repairs. Application filed by City Engineering Division. 10. Poplar Grove Park Pavilion 70,000 1190 West 800 South Funding to upgrade the existing pavilion, remove fireplace and re-roof. Application filed by City Engineering Division. 11. Riverside Drive Streetscape 150,000 700 North to 1050 North on east side of Riverside Dr. between street and Jordan River Funding to provide a new sidewalk on the east side of Riverside Drive and connect to existing bridge over Jordan River. Funding also includes grading, erosion control, landscaping improvements and irrigation system. Application filed by City Engineering Division. 12. Riverside Park Parking Lot 43,000 711 North 1400 West Funding to provide new parking lot on north side of park adjacent to improved tennis courts; landscape and revise the irrigation system. Application filed by the City Engineering Division. 4111 6 I I13. Riverside Park Playground Replacement&ADA Modifications 140,000 711 North 1400 West I Funding to upgrade and provide additional equipment to an existing playground that is old and does not meet the ADA Accessibility and National Safety Standards. Funds will be used for design and construction, concrete sidewalks and other surfacing, and containment for the playground within Riverside Park. Application filed by City Engineering Division. I14. Roberta LaConia—Parking Lot Improvements 22,000 740 South 240 East Funding to improve visibility into this publicly owned parking lot by replacing hedges with sod and I irrigation system and replacing rear chain-link fence with solid block wall. Application filed by City Engineering Division. I 15. Sherwood Park Playground 91,000 1500 West 400 South Funding to remove existing playground equipment and replace with facility that meets ADA standards. Application filed by City Engineering Division. I 16.Tauffer Park Playground 240,000 300 East 700 South I Funding to remove existing playground equipment and surrounding improvements and replace with equipment, improvements and surfaces to make it meet ADA standards. Application filed by City Engineering Division. I 17.Warm Springs Park Restroom 120,000 840 North 300 West Funding to replace the existing restroom facility to make it meet ADA standards. Application filed by City Engineering Division. TOTAL PARKS REQUESTS $2,477,000 6. PUBLIC SERVICES REQUESTED AMOUNTS I 1.Elevate to Educate 54,000 Adventure Center 3868 South 200 East I This request is for funding to pay for tuition for 10 children to attend day care for infants, pre-school and school-age children, and also for after school programs. Funding is also requested for salaries, materials and training costs for 5 teachers. Tuition is offered to children whose parents are attending higher Ieducation classes. Application filed by for-profit organization. 2. Beat the Street—Byrd House 56,000 African American Task Force I 6826 S 2000 East, Holladay This request is for funding for administrative support, including salaries for 3 staff and van drivers, supplies and operating expenses for a program that provides out-patient substance abuse programs Ithrough mentoring, tutoring, life and social skills training, vocational training, drug free counseling and family and personal skills. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 3. Refugee Counseling Service 20,000 I Asian Association of Utah Program 1588 South Major Street This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for one staff position and interpreter expenses for a program that provides mental health counseling, drug and alcohol I 7 prevention and treatment services, English classes, and parenting classes for refugees. This program provides a service that allows refugees to integrate into the community while maintaining their cultural identity. Refugees suffer not only from language barriers and cultural differences but many also suffer from the loss of family and personal support groups. This program also provides refugee employment referrals and community outreach to refugees. The Asian Association is the only licensed counseling facility with refugee language capabilities. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 4. Transportation Sensation at Poplar Grove 30,896 1 Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Salt Lake Program 460 S Concord St. Funding for salaries and benefits for van driver and purchase of 15 passenger van for program which transports youth to Boys& Girls Club activities at Poplar Grove location from Franklin, Edison, Parkview, Mountainview elementary schools. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 5.Youth With A Voice 32,416 i Boys and Girls Club of Greater Salt Lake Program 968 Sugarmont Avenue This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for four staff positions, to operate boys and girls club programs at three locations to enhance self-esteem, provide recreational opportunities and leadership skills for youth who are at risk for academic failure, delinquency, and/or gang involvement. This program targets at-risk 11-17 year olds and anticipates serving 160 youth recruited from club membership, local schools, juvenile court and other community-based programs. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 6. Capitol West Boys and Girls Club 34,000 Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Salt Lake Program 567 West 300 North This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for three staff positions, for a program that provides recreational programs and counseling for high-risk, poverty-level children. This club provides a safe haven for 900 youth in the Jackson, Guadalupe and West Capitol Hill areas. Trained, caring, professional staff and volunteers provide a diverse array of programming, including the Job Placement and Mentoring Program (career development, job skills), Power Hour(daily homework activities), Ultimate Journey (a life skills curriculum), Smart Moves (a national tobacco, alcohol and drug prevention curriculum), and Clubservice/Americorps (community service projects, arts and crafts projects, health and life skill programs, special events and field trips, and non-competitive team sports). The facility is open daily after school and on Saturdays from 11:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 7.Weigand Resource Center 66,871 Catholic Community Services of Utah Program 235 South Rio Grande This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for four staff positions, building maintenance and repairs and utilities for a program that provides day management and case management services to the homeless. The center provides the homeless a place to shower, get a haircut, store baggage, do laundry, pick up mail, search for employment, use the telephone, obtain fresh drinking water and use restroom facilities. Referrals are available to appropriate services needed by the homeless to help them eliminate the barriers that led to their homeless situation. The center serves the needs of nearly 150 homeless people per day, of whom, 1,858 were unduplicated clients during the past year. This is the only facility of its kind in the city. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 8. Parent Enrichment Series 7,500 Children's Museum of Utah 840 North 300 West This request is for funding of administrative support for a program that teaches parents how to be proactive in their children's cognitive, emotional, social and physical development. Parent training in both 8 I I English and Spanish is provided after normal museum hours for six-week periods. 125 families including 270 persons are expected to be served with the funding. Application filed by a nonprofit organization. I 9. Community Health Centers 150,000 Rose Park Clinic: 1365 West 100 North Central City Clinic: 461 South 400 East I This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for three staff positions, medical supplies, x-rays, free patient medication and patient education. Community Health Centers anticipates providing 1300 family practice health care appointments to 370 Salt Lake City Iuninsured, low-income residents. They also anticipate providing 381 dental care appointments to 212 Salt Lake City uninsured, low-income persons in Salt Lake City with special health care needs who face barriers to health care access. In 1999, Community Health Centers served 12,401 Salt Lake City residents through more than 42,858 primary care appointments and 2,871 Salt Lake City residents I through 5,555 dental care appointments. 99% of their clients have incomes at or below the federal poverty level; 55% are single mothers and 39% are children. The cost of the average medical encounter is$93.21; the cost of the average dental encounter is$87.15. Application filed by nonprofit organization. I 10. Crossroads Emergency Food Pantry 14,000 Crossroads Urban Center Program 347 South 400 East I This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for one staff position for a food pantry that works to help meet the needs of the homeless, destitute and low-income families. This program also offers counseling on the availability of food stamps, shelters, TANF, WIC and other social service programs. This program is unique in that it also specializes in meeting the needs of I infants and their families with formula, baby food, diapers and other resources. Crossroads also assists people in meeting their needs for gasoline, prescriptions, bus tokens and funding to prevent evictions and utility shut-offs. A 30% increase in demand for services is expected during the next year, placing the I. number of household members served at approximately 46,000 people. Food distributions served 36,075 people in 1999. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 11. Family Support Center—Crisis Nursery 10,000 I 2020 South Lake Street This request is for administrative costs for house parent salaries for a program that provides short-term crisis care to children ages 13 and under who are at risk for abuse or neglect. Services are provided free I or on a sliding scale based on income and family size. A new family counseling program offers family therapy, parenting classes and stress management classes. Last year, the number of referrals to the Division of Family Services for child abuse exceeded 17,150. Approximately 32% of the investigations resulted in substantiation of abuse. Statistically, another substantial incident of child abuse occurs within I our community every 90 minutes. Last year the Family Support Center provided services to 705 low- income children who were Salt Lake City residents. Application filed by nonprofit organization. I 12. First Step House—Administrative support 35,230 411 Grant Street This request is for funding for the design and purchase of a computer system and database, to update systems for Breathalyzer and urine screening of clients, and to purchase supplies and materials I associated with these systems. This program provides substance abuse treatment services to clients on both a residential and outpatient basis. Many of these clients are homeless. Application filed by nonprofit organization. I13. Guadalupe Center Educational Programs —Early Learning Center 44,000 340 South Goshen This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for one staff I position, and for rent, custodial expenses, building maintenance, insurance, utilities, telephones, security, educational supplies and technological upgrades for a program that provides preschool and home visits serving low-income children and families. This preschool is an early intervention program for at-risk IP children from birth to age eight and their families. Trained staff coach parents in positive parent/child I 9 I interactions and ways to foster a child's normal development- physically, socially, emotionally, and I intellectually. At ages 3-5 children attend the site-based preschool. They are currently serving up to 90 parents and 140 children who are low-income and live in inner-city neighborhoods afflicted with high I criminal and gang activity. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 14. LifeCare Services—Security Light and Lock Project 50,000 Community Services Council Program I 1025 South 700 West This request is for administrative costs, for a program that provides home safety Information, inspections and modifications. Application filed by nonprofit organization. I 15. Literacy Volunteers of America—Adult Literacy & ESL 49,108 175 North 600 West Funding for a program that recruits and trains volunteers who tutor adults to read, write and comprehend English as a Second Language as well as basic survival skills for refugees who need pre-literacy and survival skills. The overall goal of the program is to help refugee families integrate culturally, socially, and economically. The number proposed to be served by this funding is 556 people. Application filed by I nonprofit organization. 16. Neighborhood House—Van Purchase 50,000 1050 W 500 South I This request is for funding for the purchase of two vans to transport low-income children to child day care and to transport adults to a day center. Over 200 children are provided services during the school year, while 120 adult clients are served weekly with the van transport. Application filed by nonprofit I organization. 17. Oulessebougou-Utah Alliance—Cultural education trunks 13,000 10 West 100 South, Suite 605 MI This request is for funding of cultural education trunks to be distributed to eligible schools for second grade teachers to use in the state-approved social studies curriculum. The program seeks to work in a partnership with villagers of Oulessebougou, Mali, West Africa to achieve their economic, health care and I community objectives, and to provide the opportunity for both cultures to learn from each other. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 18. Our House Day Care Center 165,045 I Our House Childcare & Family Education 353 West 200 South This request is for administrative costs to include salaries, taxes and benefits for six staff positions, to I purchase children's health care supplies, and to fund construction costs for an office space for an organization that provides child care services to homeless and low-income children. This center operates to provide a preschool program to homeless and low-income children, ranging in ages from birth to five years. Almost all of the enrolled families are at, or below, 50%of the area median income. One of the I Center's major goals is to provide stability in the lives of these disadvantaged children by providing a reliable, consistent setting. The educational component for all classrooms focuses on each child's social, emotional and cognitive development. All teachers are required to have or obtain a current Child I Development Associates degree, therefore, requiring the Center to pay a salary equivalent to the upper range of pay for daycare providers. It is anticipated this program will provide services to 42 children during the next year. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 19. People Helping People 37,988 1 175 South Main Street #480 Funding for program materials and workbooks for a program that provides support to single parents by I helping them create economic freedom for themselves and their families. The purpose of the program is to help families make the transition from welfare to work, help the working poor find family sustaining employment and to provide local area employers and the community with the advantages that a .11 supported and networked workforce offers. Of the 106 clients served last year, 71 are currently working, 10 ' 6 have moved out of state, 2 are in school, 9 recently left their jobs, and17 are working with their mentors to complete tasks and develop employment skills. It is anticipated that 160 new clients will benefit from ' this program during the next year if funding is received. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 20. Prevent Child Abuse Utah -Child Abuse Prevention Program 22,530 331 South Rio Grande#304 ' Funding for supplies and equipment for a program sponsored by Prevent Child Abuse Utah to provide a comprehensive program to elementary schools to help prevent child abuse. Under this program, children are taught what abuse is, given prevention strategies, including personal body safety rules, and motivated ' into action if threatened or victimized. Children are also taught that abuse is never the fault of the child and the need to tell a trusted adult is stressed. This program is violence prevention, not sex education and has been approved by the Salt Lake City School District Human Sexuality and Maturation Curriculum Committee. Application filed by nonprofit organization. ' 21. Rape Recovery Center—Crisis Intervention Services 40,150 2035 South 1300 East ' This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for five staff positions for a program that provides counseling services to rape victims. Funding is also requested for utilities, telephones, insurance, supplies, and mileage expenses. It has provided services to more than 50,000 sexual assault victims since it was established in 1974. Last year the Rape Recovery Center ' provided direct client service to 2250 new clients, and returning client services 844 times, an 11% increase over the previous year. In addition to providing crisis intervention services, the Rape Recovery Center refers clients to other services for long-term therapeutic counseling. This is the only not-for-profit, independent, no-fee agency of its kind in Utah. Application filed by nonprofit organization. ' 22. Housing Outreach Rental Program 37,000 Salt Lake Community Action Program Citywide in CD eligible areas This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for two staff positions, for a program to assist low/mod income families in obtaining safe, affordable housing and to increase the number of low cost apartments available. This program will assist 1000 low-income families ' living in Salt Lake City by listing 800 low to moderately priced rental units and will provide a one-time partial payment of one month's rent expense per family, when available, to avoid immediate eviction or homeless relocation assistance when no other resources or assistance exist. This program also helps ' individuals understand their rights and responsibilities as renters and provides relocation services to those individuals living in large apartment complexes and hotels who will be displaced because of demolition and/or uninhabitable housing conditions. Application filed by nonprofit organization. ' 23. Northwest Emergency Food Pantry 27,500 Salt Lake Community Action Program 1300 West 300 North ' This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for two staff positions, for a program that provides food and social services to people in emergency situations. Food orders are filled to meet nutritional needs sufficient to feed the household for three days. Each of these households can access these services six times in a twelve-month period. The Northwest Emergency ' Food Pantry is a program of the Community Action Program, which not only provides emergency services, but also provides comprehensive services that help people become more self-sufficient. It served more than 3,800 unduplicated households during the last fiscal year. Application filed by nonprofit ' organization. 24. Tenant Maintenance Project 12,500 Salt Lake Community Action Program ' 764 South 200 West This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for two staff positions, for a program that provides low-income tenants with home maintenance/money management training. This project would provide 50 households (150 people) living in Salt Lake City with home ' 11 I maintenance and budget/money management training. The project will provide training sessions to low- I income households that are in jeopardy of losing their subsidized housing unit or those who are having a hard time making financial ends meet and/or not living up to their rental obligations. It will also provide a I counseling program that will work with the families as a support system, helping these families to identify and eliminate their personal, social, financial and employment barriers in order to maintain their housing unit. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 25. Salt Lake Donated Dental Services 39,500 I 415 West 400 South Funding to purchase dental equipment, anesthetic products and office supplies for a program that I provides dental services to very low-income and homeless persons. The services provided include exams, fillings and cleaning, root canals, periodontal treatments, oral surgery, extractions, dentures, crown/bridge work and orthodontist referrals. Salt Lake Donated Dental is the only organization of its kind in the city. It is anticipated that comprehensive dental care will be provided to 7200 different patients I during the next year. Over 200 licensed, board certified dentists and registered dental hygienists volunteer to provide this dental service. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 26. Neighborhood Self-Help Grant 18,000 Salt Lake City Housing and Neighborhood Development Citywide in eligible areas Funding the provide grants to eligible community councils for preparing and distributing letters and I agendas. Application filed by City Housing and Neighborhood Development Division. 27. Crime Prevention/Neighborhood Improvements 79,780 I Salt Lake City Police Department Program Citywide in CD eligible areas This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for two staff positions, to operate SLC Police Department programs that educate residents on crime prevention. The Crime Prevention Unit of the Police Department oversees such programs as Mobile Neighborhood Watch, 11101 Lady Beware, Senior Safety, Business and Residential Security Checks, Gang Prevention, and the C.O.P. (Community Oriented Policing) program. Crime prevention officers identify the areas in need of I attention and coordinate with citizens, government agencies and other organizations needed to ensure successful projects. Application filed by Salt Lake City Police Department. 28. Mobile Neighborhood Watch Program 10,000 111 Salt Lake City Police Department Program 327 East 200 South Funding to purchase equipment including magnetic vehicle placards, vests, radio batteries, scanner IIbatteries, office supplies and duplication materials for a program that provides support to the SLC Police Department by reporting suspicious activities and being a visible deterrent to crime. Mobile Neighborhood Watch volunteers coordinate with the Police Department to patrol their own neighborhoods and notify the police of suspicious or criminal activity. Volunteers also work to train new volunteers I interested in the program. Application filed by Salt Lake City Police Department. 29. Community Shelter and Self-Sufficiency Program 126,000 I The Road Home (formerly Traveler's Aid Society) 210 South Rio Grande This request is for administrative costs for salary, taxes and benefits for seven staff positions for Travelers Aid Society to operate the men's/women's and family shelters. Their mission is to provide people with I emergency assistance and opportunities to take steps out of homelessness and help them make the transition to independent living. Travelers Aid serves approximately 400 men, women and families with children each day. Programs include emergency assistance, case management, self-sufficiency plans, I and transitional housing. The self-sufficiency program provides a structure, in addition to basic shelter, that assists participants in achieving self-sufficiency. The program includes supportive services such as case management, employment assistance, support and counseling groups, adult education, volunteer opportunities and children's activities. In FY 99-00, Travelers Aid Society served 1521 men, 97 women, 111111 12 I I Iand 119 families with 208 adults and 271 children, with an average of 400 people per night. During this same time frame, 44 families and 29 individuals moved out of the shelter and into transitional housing. An additional 126 individuals and two families moved into permanent housing. Application filed by I nonprofit organization. 30. Utah Nonprofit Housing Corporation (UNPHC) 40,000 I 765 South 200 East#A This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for three staff positions, including the business manager, accountant and office clerk positions. UNPHC along with its affiliated nonprofit housing corporations has developed 656 units of affordable housing for elderly Ipersons, low income persons, persons with disabilities, the homeless, the chronically mentally ill and those with HIV/AIDS in Salt Lake City. Another 41 units are currently under construction for lower income elderly persons. It is anticipated that 900 Salt Lake City residents, through more than 650 housing units, I will benefit from this project. Utah Nonprofit's focus is to develop and provide quality, cost-effective housing, with rents affordable to persons at or below 50% of the area median income. They work closely with community groups and other nonprofit organizations to provide supportive services, housing referrals and case management for their clients. Application filed by nonprofit organization. I31.Young Refugees of Utah for World Peach 25,000 Utah Peace Institute I 221 South 1200 East This request is for funding of administrative costs to include a portion of salary, supplies, mileage and office equipment for a program that provides services to refugee and immigrant youth, offering a welcome network for youth in local schools, community outreach involving youth in community service, leadership I training, and after school activities. Application filed by organization in the process of applying for nonprofit status. Ili 32.Wasatch Community Gardens—Youth & Community Gardens 15,000 350 S 400 East, Suite 101 B This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for one staff position for a program that provides a food source for low-income people by operating community I gardens in eligible areas. In the Youth Gardening program, more than 800 inner-city youth plant, tend, harvest and sell or donate organic produce to the low-income as they learn responsibility, commitment and cooperation. In the Community Gardening Program, more than 60 families grew fresh food for I themselves or others in need. All four of the community gardens are located on previously vacant lots in inner-city neighborhoods. It is anticipated that this program will provide services to 900 people during the next year. Application filed by nonprofit organization. I 33.YMCA -After School and Summer Enrichment Program 18,000 210 South Rio Grande Funding for operational support for a program coordinator, program leaders, arts and crafts supplies, I admission fees, and van upkeep and gasoline for a program that provides structure, supervision and educational/recreational activities during after school hours for homeless children residing at the Community Shelter and Self-Sufficiency Center. The children will be picked up at the shelter each day after school (including summer school) and transported to a designated location (community center or I boys and girls club)for that day's activities. Art, sports, games, reading, nature exploration and field trips are incorporated into the weekly schedule. The program focuses on building confidence, teaching social skills and manners, and establishing caring relationships with these children. This program allows the I parents to focus on job training, counseling and/or employment opportunities. It is anticipated that 100 children will benefit from this program during the next year. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 34. Salt Lake Community Development Corp.—Affordability Project 40,000 I 501 East 1700 South Funding for administrative support for a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for two staff positions, office supplies, equipment and utilities, travel and vehicle maintenance for a program which acquires building la° I 13 materials through donation or low-cost purchases for use in building affordable housing in Salt Lake City as well as statewide. TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICE REQUESTS $1,471,014 7. PUBLIC SERVICE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS REQUESTED AMOUNTS U S 1. "and Justice for all" -Community Legal Center technology 90,700 Legal Aid Society Offer made on proposed site Funding to purchase telecommunications hardware, cable and network for a collaborative effort project between the Legal Aid Society, the Disability Law Center, the Multi-Cultural Legal Center, Utah Legal Services and the "And Justice for All" program to provide legal services to low-income people by co- locating the primary legal providers. The partner agencies provide outreach, education, and legally based advocacy to help these low-income citizens in areas of basic need like food, shelter, and income. The intent is to locate a site on a main line for public transportation in an area providing easy accessibility. In 1999, legal services were provided to more than 16,000 individuals, but another 11,568 received no assistance or limited assistance. It is anticipated that this project would benefit between 16,000 and 20,000 individuals. Application filed by nonprofit organizations. 2.Artspace—Furnishings for dance floor and classrooms 50,000 Institute for Art and Imagination 200 South and 500 West Funding to create and furnish permanent classroom space and a dance studio for a program that offers year-round classes for children ages 7 to 18 in the Bridges Project, with over 300 children to be served with the improvements. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 3.Asian Association -Parking Lot and Roof Repair 25,000 1600 South Major Street Funding for building improvements to include construction of a parking lot with a storm drainage system and minimal landscaping for a program that provides mental health counseling, drug and alcohol prevention and treatment services, English classes, and parenting classes for refugees. This program provides a service that allows refugees to integrate into the community while maintaining their cultural identity. Refugees suffer not only from language barriers and cultural differences but many also suffer from the loss of family and personal support groups. This program also provides refugee employment referrals and community outreach to refugees. The Asian Association is the only licensed counseling facility with refugee language capabilities. It is anticipated this program will benefit 1,800 low-income individuals during the next year. Application filed by a nonprofit organization. 4.The Children's Museum of Utah—Teen Enrichment Center 300,000 100 South and Rio Grande Funding to support construction costs of a new facility to be located in the Gateway area. CDBG funds will be used for the new Teen Enrichment Center, which will provide a technology-rich, safe environment for underserved youth ages 10 to 18 to help provide them with the necessary foundation for positive growth and development. This Center will provide youth with opportunities to interact and create a multi- media environment and will feature a video and sound studio, computers and a radio station. Youth will be mentored by community artists in the creation of videos, photographs, sound and music recordings, website development, desktop publishing and radio programming. The center will function on a drop-in basis and offer structured project-based programs. It is anticipated this program will benefit approximately 700 low-income youth on an annual basis. Application filed by a nonprofit organization. 14 I I5. 10th East Senior Center Landscaping 59,425 East Central Community Council I Funding to redesign and install new landscaping in front of senior center, located at 237 South 1000 East, to include sprinkler system, sidewalks, and low-maintenance plantings. Application filed by community council. I 6. First Step House—Transitional housing parking lot 9,500 First Step House Funding for driveway and parking lot renovation for a program that provides substance abuse treatment I services to clients on both a residential and outpatient basis. Many of these clients are homeless. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 7. Nettie Gregory Center—Interior and exterior improvements 46,000 I 724 West South Temple Funding for building improvements for a program that offers services to disadvantaged individuals and at- risk youth. The building is currently being used for four hours each day to host a life skills program that I serves court-involved youth in the community and will be used to house the Poplar Grove Boys and Girls Club programs during the construction of the new club. The building improvements requested include interior and exterior improvements: floor tile, paint and drywall, weather-stripping, new water heater, parking lot repair and new parking lot lights. It is anticipated that approximately 500 people will be served Iat the Center during the next year. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 8. Rape Recover Center—Building renovation 35,800 2035 South 1300 East I Funding to replace windows and add stucco to exterior walls for a program that provides counseling services to rape victims. It has provided services to more than 50,000 sexual assault victims since it was established in 1974. Last year the Rape Recovery Center provided direct client service to 2250 new 110 clients, and returning client services 844 times, an 11% increase over the previous year. In addition to providing crisis intervention services, the Rape Recovery Center refers clients to other services for long- term therapeutic counseling. This is the only not-for-profit, independent, no-fee agency of its kind in Utah. Application filed by nonprofit organization.I 9. Salvation Army Renovating bathrooms 8,683 252 South 500 East I Funding for removal of old flooring and installing new floor in bathroom and shower facilities for a program that provides a residential alcohol/drug treatment program for adult men and women with substance abuse problems and those with who are dually diagnosed with both substance abuse and mental health concerns. This facility has the capacity to house 108 residents and support a staff of 30. Application filed I by a nonprofit organization. 11. Special Contingency Fund 10,000 I SLC Housing and Neighborhood Development 451 South State Street Funding to provide building improvement grants to nonprofit organizations who provide services to low/moderate-income persons when the nonprofit organization experiences an emergency situation such I as a leaking roof, plumbing problems or other emergency situations that might significantly impair their ability to meet the needs of their clients. All requests for this funding will be reviewed and administered by the staff of Housing and Neighborhood Development (HAND). Federal regulations require a public I review process of all projects awarded funding. This special contingency fund would provide a pool of funds that could be used to assist the local nonprofit organizations with their emergency needs since it will have gone through the public review process. Application filed by SLC Housing and Neighborhood Development. I I15 12. Utah Alcoholism Foundation—Kitchen remodel 104,200 209 Douglas Street—Mothers and Children Center Funding for a project to renovate kitchen and floor coverings, construct access ramp and reconfigure bath for ADA for a program which provides residential substance abuse treatment for women and their dependent children with a capacity of 17 persons. Services include, treatment, housing, meals, parenting classes, case management, life skills training, and support and referral services. Application filed by nonprofit organization. ' 13. Utah Alcoholism Foundation—Carpet,window coverings, parking lot 13,960 1006 East 100 South —House of Hope Funding for a project to install new carpet, window coverings and repair the driveway for a program that provides residential substance abuse treatment for women and their dependent children with a capacity of 33 persons. Services include, treatment, housing, meals, parenting classes, case management, life skills training, and support and referral services. Application filed by nonprofit organization. ' 14. Utah Food Bank 31,500 Community Services Council Program 1025 South 700 West Funding to purchase storage racks to organize food for delivery for program that provides food for low/moderate-income and homeless individuals. The Utah Food Bank fights hunger in Utah by serving as the central collection and distribution center for donated food. They currently provide food to 90 agencies and programs within Salt Lake City, and over 200 agencies within the state. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 15.Volunteers of America -Detoxification Center 16,892 252 West Brooklyn Avenue Funding for building improvements for program that provides a 60-bed alcohol/drug detoxification center where clients are taught to take responsibility for their lives and to break the cycle of drug and alcohol addiction. Clients are screened for medical problems, attend daily meetings, participate in case management and are referred to treatment programs. Building improvements include reconstruction of front and east parking lots, install 3 awnings, purchase and install two signs and provide landscaping around the facility. Application filed by nonprofit organization. TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS $801,660 I 8. PLANNING REQUESTED AMOUNTS 1. Sugar House Community Study for Historic Nomination 43,000 ' Salt Lake City Planning Division 1700 South and 2700 South, between 500/700 East and 1300 East Funding to complete the steps required for the nomination process of designation as National Register Historic District for the Sugar House Business District. This is a continuation of the 27th Year project funded by $10,000. These steps include reconnaissance level surveys, identification of significant buildings, establishment of boundary lines for the district, and intensive level surveys of selected significant buildings to complete the nomination process. There are approximately 2,394 properties in the area. Application filed Salt Lake City Planning Division. 2. Sugar House Business District Small Area Plan 45,000 Salt Lake City Planning Division Funding for a small area plan that will address multi-modes of transportation, including identifying the location and route for a future light rail station, parking circulation, new street patterns, mobility patterns within and around blocks prior to new development, and capital improvement cost estimates for streetscape enhancements. Application filed by Salt Lake City Planning Division. 16 ' 3.Wasatch Plunge Community Recreation Center Study 85,000 840 North 300 West Salt Lake City Planning Division Funding to study the feasibility of renovating the Wasatch Plunge building (currently housing the Children's Museum of Utah) including the pool area, for use as a community recreation center for the Capitol Hill community. Existing Warm Springs Park facilities, such as the tennis courts, could be used in ' conjunction with the renovated structure. The study would include the feasibility of utilizing the warm springs in the design of the new pool. The project would include development of a preliminary design layout, construction design, physical renovation and possible expansion of the structure. This building is ' listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources and is owned by the city. The Children's Museum will be vacating the building in the next two years, and relocating to the Gateway area. The relocation of the Children's Museum will provide an opportunity to reuse this historic building for its original use as a community center with aquatic facilities. Application filed by Salt Lake City Planning ' Division. 4. Rose Park Commercial Node Infrastructure Improvement Study 25,000 ' 900 West approximately between 1000 North and 900 North Salt Lake City Planning Division Funding to design infrastructure improvements to improve circulation, safety and aesthetics, including bus stops, sidewalks, crosswalks, street lighting, signage, street trees and landscaping for this important ' gateway into the neighborhood. Application filed by Salt Lake City Planning Division. 5. Master Planning and Concept Development for Parley's Creek Corridor Development 30,000 Wasatch Front Resource Conservation and Development Council Funding to develop a master plan for the Parley's Creek corridor with the objectives of reconnecting communities, providing access to destinations, increase neighborhood safety and providing multiple recreation experiences. I. TOTAL PLANNING REQUESTS $228,000 ' 9. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (10) REQUESTED AMOUNTS II.Salt Lake City Revolving Loan Fund 400,000 Salt Lake City Community & Economic Development Funding to provide low-cost loans to assist small business owners develop their businesses and taking the next step in continuing to grow their businesses. Other private and public partners will be encouraged to participate to leverage these funds. Administrative support services would include credit verification, employment status verification, screening of applicant businesses, specific outreach, legal services, and office and staff support. 2, North Temple Corridor Economic Revitalization Plan 40,000 Westside Alliance 622 W 500 North ' Funding for salaries, benefits, and operational support to develop an action for implementation of the North Temple Corridor Economic Revitalization Plan to strengthen existing businesses, encourage new businesses to relocate and stimulate an entrepreneurial spirit. Application filed by nonprofit organization. ITOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $440,000 I 17 II 10. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION REQUESTED AMOUNTS Continuum of Care Coordinator 20,000 U Utah Issues 331 South Rio Grande, Suite 60 Funding to support administrative costs of program tat coordinates homeless plans and services throughout the County, and writes the annual Continuum of Care grant application to HUD. Activities funded will include organizing the annual Continuum of Care process, collect data to determine service needs, determine gaps and prioritize needs in the homeless car system, compile gaps analysis I information HUD and County committees and service providers and develop short and long term strategies. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 11. CITY ADMINISTRATION Funding for CDBG functions necessary to administer the grant. I City Attorney's Office 55,432 Community Affairs 41,998 Environmental Assessments 55,640 I Finance 43,680 Housing and Neighborhood Development 422,694 Office of Neighborhood Services 49,711 Property Management 48,287I TOTAL CITY ADMINISTRATION REQUESTS $717,442 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION REQUESTS $737,442 III 12. PERCENT FOR ART REQUESTED AMOUNTS I Percent for Arts 3,000 To provide enhancements such as decorative pavement, railings, sculptures, fountains and other works of art. 1% of project construction cost is allocated for art projects. 13. CONTINGENCY REQUESTED AMOUNTS I Contingency Fund 80,000 I Funds set aside to cover unanticipated cost over-runs on approved construction projects. TOTAL CDBG REQUESTS $9,463,116 ANTICIPATED CDBG GRANT AVAILABLE 4,854,000 I FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR REALLOCATION 163,800 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 5,017,800 I 11111 18 I 2/5/0 SALT LAKE CI HOME PROGRAM 1 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS 2002-2003 PREVIOUS REQUESTED RECOMMENDATIONS # ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION AMOUNT YEAR AMOUNT HTFAB MAYOR COUNCIL 1 Neighborhood Housing Funding to target and acquire boarded and 175,000 01/02 150,000 150,000 150,000 Services vacant properties in 5 neighborhood areas and 200,000 00/01 develop them into affordable housing for 181,350 99/00 622 West 500 North first time home buyers earning 80%of the median 165,000 98/99 income or below. 156,750 97/98 150,000 96/97 145,000 95/96 135,000 94/95 2 Neighborhood Housing Funding to target and acquire boarded and t 202,500 01/02 210,000 128,600 198,600 Services vacant properties in FairPark area and rehab or 00/01 CHDO application develop them into affordable housing for 99/00 622 West 500 North first time home buyers earning 80%of the median 98/99 income or below. 97/98 96/97 3a SL Community Development Provides a loan/grant for 40 low/mod first time home 75,000 01/02 100,000 50,000 50,000 Corporation buyers for down payment assistance or closing costs. 50,000 00/01 If buyer resides in home for 15 years,the funding 50,000 99/00 501 East 1700 South becomes a grant,otherwise,the owner repays the 50,000 98/99 $2500 at the time of the sale. 50,000 97/98 68,000 96/97 150,000 95/96 180,000 94/95 3b SL Community Development Funding to construct new single family detached homes 192,500 01/02 200,000 100,000 100,000 Corporation for low-income families on scattered, in-fill sites. Funds 100,000 00/01 will enable the CDC to build up to four homes at 100,000 99/00 501 East 1700 South any one time, and as projects are completed, funds 98/99 will be returned to the City to be used for additional 97/98 projects or other purposes. 96/97 95/96 94/95 4 Utah Nonprofit Corporation Funding for renovation of the interior and exterior of 150,000 150,000 150,000 CHDO application Jacob Apartments,which provides transitional housing. 756 South 200 East, Suite A Salt Lake City, UT 841111-3840 2/5/02 SALT LAKE CITY HOME PROGRAM 2 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS 2002-2003 PREVIOUS REQUESTED RECOMMENDATIONS # ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION AMOUNT YEAR AMOUNT HTFAB MAYOR COUNCIL 5 SLC Housing& Funding for home owner rehabilitation, First Time 570,000 01/02 570,000 570,000 570,000 Neighborhood Development Home Buyer Assistance, and Financial Services 508,550 00/01 451 S. State Street, Room 404 programs 508,550 99/00 SLC, UT 84111 563,000 98/99 563,000 97/98 562,472 96/97 510,200 95/96 648,434 94/95 6 Family Support Center Funding for supportive co-housing facility located in 50,000 99/00 100,000 70,000 0 Midvale,which will provide supportive services-job training, mentoring, parenting and home management 777 W.Center classes. Midvale, UT 84047 7 Administration Costs Funding to administer the HOME program 135,000 01/02 135,400 135,400 135,400 (10%of total HOME allocation). 121,500 00/01 SLC HAND 120,900 99/00 451 S. State, Room 406 112,200 98/99 SLC, UT 84111 104,500 97/98 100,608 96/97 104,800 95/96 97,400 94/95 TOTALS 1,615,400 1,354,000 1,354,000 0 CHDO requirement: $203,100 2002-03 allocation 1,354,000 Difference 261,400 II. Mill MINI IMO i 1111111 111111 I I HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM (HOME) PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS (2002/2003) 1 Neighborhood Housing Services CHDO application 210,000 622 West 500 North Non-CHDO application 150,000 IFunds requested, under the Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) application and the non-CHDO application, are for the No Longer Boarded (NLB) Project and Vacant Land Acquisition (VLA) programs. The primary missions of the "NLB" and "VIA" I programs are to target and acquire all boarded and vacant properties in the Fairpark, Glendale, Poplar Grove, Rose Park and West Capitol Hill Neighborhoods. Components of this project include: planning, pre-development, site improvements, development, 1 rehabilitation and financing. Implementation of this strategy will require an assessment of the structural condition of the boarded homes to determine the potential for rehab. Razed homes will be replaced with in-fill projects. Vacant property acquired will provide opportunities for in- ' fill projects, reconstruction or new construction. NHS provides home ownership opportunities in target neighborhoods. Application filed by nonprofit organization. According to Federal Regulations, 15% of each year's HOME allocation must be Iawarded to a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO). NHS and Utah Nonprofit Housing are the CHDO applicants this year. The total HOME grant is I $1,354,000; 15% of that amount equals $203,100. Salt Lake Community Development Corporation (CDC) 100,000 is 501 East 1700 South "Own in Salt Lake" Down Payment Assistance Program I Funds to provide 40 down payment assistance grants for families earning 80% of median income or less who are purchasing homes within the Salt Lake City limits. Each $2500 grant will be used for rehab or closing costs. Should the homebuyer sell or dispose of the home on I or before fifteen years of their closing, all funds will be returned to the CDC. A deed of trust, promissory note and a recorded lien will be used to insure that funds are properly returned to the CDC in a timely manner. This down payment assistance program is one of the most I popular HOME programs. It provides the opportunity for home ownership for many who would not otherwise be able to purchase a home. Application filed by nonprofit organization. I Salt Lake Community Development Corporation 200,000 501 East 1700 South New construction I Funding to construct new single-family detached homes for low-income families on scattered, in-fill sites. Funds will enable the Community Development Corporation (CDC) to build up to four homes at any one time, and as the projects are completed, HOME funds will be returned I to the City to be used for additional projects, or other purposes as specified by the City. The CDC provides new housing construction. This is a revolving loan fund and these dollars continue to grow and roll over. CDC has provided this service since 1993 and the typical I building timetable is three to six months. The CDC works cooperatively with Salt Lake City's Housing and Neighborhood Development to implement this program. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 1 Utah Nonprofit Housing Corporation 150,000 756 South 200 East Funding for the renovation of the interior and exterior of the Jacob Apartments, located at 303 East 600 South, that provide transitional housing for families who have been living in homeless shelters around the Salt Lake Valley. In conjunction with supportive service agencies, these residents are provided with case management and support to make a successful transition into permanent housing. Application filed by a nonprofit organization. Housing and Neighborhood Development 570,000 451 South State Street, Room 404 I 1. Home Owner and Rental Unit Rehabilitation Funding to provide technical assistance to eligible property owners of one to four dwelling ' units who are low-income and occupy the property as their principal residence. Provide technical assistance to the owners of rental units in need of rehabilitation who rent to low- and very-low income tenants. Services include property inspections, preparation of cost ' estimates and work descriptions, recommendation of contractors and supervision of work during the construction phase of projects. Properties are brought up to housing code standards adopted by Salt Lake City. ' 2. First Time Home Buyer Assistance Provide funds for acquisition or acquisition and rehabilitation or reconstruction of homes to be purchased by those who qualify as first-time homebuyers. Program consists of evaluation and appraisal of units for preliminary estimates for the purchase of properties, with additional services as required for rehabilitation, marketing and selling. 3. Financial Services Assists owners in securing financing to accomplish the rehabilitation of their properties. Loans are processed and approved according to the policies established by Salt Lake City Corporation. The process includes verification of mortgages, appraisal of properties, loan limit analysis, credit and title searches and preparation of appropriate loan applications. This program provides home ownership opportunities for low-income families. Funds are used for interest write-downs making home ownership possible for many families who otherwise could not qualify. Funds are well leveraged with bank pool funds. The low interest rental rehabilitation program is critical in keeping our current housing stock in safe, livable condition. Application filed by Salt Lake City Housing and Neighborhood Development. TOTAL HOME REQUESTS $1,615,400 AMOUNT OF GRANT: $1,354,000 DIFFERENCE: $ 261,400 1.11 2 N NMI IMO MO r - ... ... - ... ... =I MI Ell 2/21 SLC glEProgram 1 Funding Recommendations 2002-2003 PREVIOUS REQUEST RECOMMENDATIONS # ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION AMT. YEAR AMOUNT CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 1 Salt Lake Community Shelter and Funding for operational support for program that 90,000 01/02 90,000 90,000 90,000 Resource Center provides emergency shelter and supportive services 90,000 00/01 to homeless families,women,and men. 88,000 99/00 The Road Home Utilities-$15,462 94,000 98/99 210 South Rio Grande, Salt Lake City UT Repair/Maintenance-$51,255 90,000 97/98 Operational Expense-$9,667 100,000 96/97 Insurance-$13,616 2 Housing Outreach Rental Program Funding for program that provides rental and 18,000 01/02 25,000 18,000 18,000 mortgage assistance to families to prevent eviction or 21,000 00/01 Salt Lake Community Action Program foreclosure caused by temporary circumstances 24,000 99/00 764 South 200 West beyond their control. 30,000 98/99 Direct client services-$25,000 30,000 97/98 27,000 96/97 3 Marillac House Funding for capital items for a program that provides 5,000 01/02 10,000 10,000 5,000 emergency shelter to homeless women and their 5,000 00/01 Catholic Community Services children. 99/00 2570 W 1700 South Security Cameras-$2,500 98/99 Salt Lake City, UT 84104 Security Bars-$5,000 97/98 Wood Chips&Gravel-$1,000 96/97 Thermostat Covers-$150 Furniture-$950 4 St. Mary's Home for Men Funding for a program that provides emergency 0 01/02 10,000 10,000 5,000 shelter,case management, and group therapy to 5,000 00/01 1206 West 200 South adult men who have chronic substance abuse 0 99/00 Catholic Community Services problems. 98/99 2570 W 1700 South Maintenance-$4,000 97/98 Salt Lake City, UT 84104 Utilities-$6,000 96/97 5 Safe Haven Funding for operations of program that provides 17,600 01/02 30,000 18,000 23,000 services, shelter and transitional housing for 22,600 00/01 550 W 700 S homeless and mentally ill individuals. 24,000 99/00 Valley Mental Health Maintenance&supplies-$30,000 30,000 98/99 5965 South 900 East #240 97/98 96/97 6 Residential Self-Sufficiency Funding for program which provides transitional 25,000 01/02 25,000 25,000 25,000 Program housing to low-income women in transition from 16,000 00/01 homelessness or who are at risk of becoming 16,000 99/00 YWCA homeless. 20,000 98/99 322 East 300 South Case Management-$18,000 97/98 Utilities-$7,000 96/97 2/21/02 SLC ESG Program 2 Funding Recommendations 2002-2003 PREVIOUS REQUEST RECOMMENDATIONS # ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION AMT. YEAR AMOUNT CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 7 SL Interfaith Hospitality Network Funding for program that provides shelter,food and 01/02 15,000 0 5,000 assistance for homeless families. 5,000 00/01 802 West 800 South Salaries&wages-$15,000 4,800 99/00 Salt Lake City, UT 84165-1188 6,000 98/99 97/98 96/97 TOTAL GRANT REQUESTS 205,000 171,000 171,000 0 TOTAL ESG GRANT AVAILABLE 171,000 171,000 171,000 DIFFERENCE -34,000 1.11° NM MI NE MN2 - NMI MI NM MN INN I IEMERGENCY SHELTER GRANT (ESG) PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS (2002/2003) I 1. Salt Lake Community Shelter & Resource Center $90,000 Travelers Aid Society 210 South Rio Grande I Funding for operational expenses for shelter, which provides shelter stays and case management and supportive services to the homeless. ESG funds requested for 2002/2003 will provide for utilities ($15,462), repair/maintenance ($51,255), operational I expenses (9,667), and insurance ($13,616). These funds will be matched on a dollar for dollar basis by private contributions received from foundations, individuals, corporations and others in the community. The average length of stay for families at the shelter I during the past year was 77 days compared with 52 days for men and 45 days for women due to the increased challenges families face in income needed to cover their basic costs. Travelers Aid served 1755 people in fiscal year 2000/2001, an average of I 400 people per night. The total number of 24-hour shelter stays was 120,602. The shelter provides a warm, safe place to sleep, do laundry, bathe, and have access to food and clothing. Basic shelter is combined with a variety of services designed to I assist homeless people in becoming self-sufficient. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 114) 2. Housing Outreach Rental Program 25,000 Salt Lake Community Action Program 764 South 200 West I Funding for homeless prevention by providing direct client intervention with financial assistance for one-time rent/mortgage payments. Funds will be matched with low- income client's personal resources such as family, church and social services. Funds I will be used to help provide approximately 100 low-income families of Salt Lake City with rental assistance to avoid eviction; or mortgage payments to avoid foreclosure; or relocation assistance to help a homeless family move into permanent housing. The I assistance will be given when the housing client can demonstrate that the default or rental arrears was caused by a circumstance or set of circumstances beyond the family's control, which significantly affected the family's ability to pay, and temporarily I rendered them unable to resolve the delinquency within a reasonable time or make full payment. Funds received in 2000/2001 of$18,000 assisted 61 families. Application filed by nonprofit organization. I3. Marillac House 10,000 Catholic Community Services I 2570 West 1700 South Funding for capital items for a program that provides emergency shelter, basic needs services and case management to women and their children. Requested funds for I2002/2003 would purchase security cameras ($2,500), security bars ($5,000), wood chips and gravel landscaping ($1,000), thermostat covers ($150) and furniture ($950). For 2000/2001 the shelter served 540 women and children, with 10 women and 6 t children sheltered at any given time. The majority of clients are escaping abusive situations. Residents receive emergency shelter, food, clothing, case management and other services, including assistance in locating transitional housing. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 4. St. Mary's Home for Men (1206 West 200 South) 10,000 Catholic Community Services 2570 West 1700 South Funding for utilities and maintenance for a 38-bed facility that provides shelter, case management, group therapy, and behavior modification techniques to adult men who have chronic substance abuse problems. Requested funds for 2002/2003 would go toward maintenance ($4,000) and utilities ($6,000). All of the clients are homeless, though some may be employed. The average length of stay at St. Mary's is three months. The average age is 39.9 years. Approximately 65% suffer from mental health ' problems. For 2000/2001 the facility provided shelter and case management services to 43 men. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 5. Safe Haven (550 West 700 South) 30,000 Valley Mental Health 5965 South 900 East #420 Funding to provide operational support for program that services homeless individuals with mental illness. Safe Haven is the second phase of a three phase program which provides services to severely and persistently mentally ill homeless individuals. This 4)1 population rarely fits into traditional homeless services being offered. They are disruptive or so uncomfortable they cannot stay in regular homeless shelters. These individuals need housing options with minimal barriers and expectations, where their , needs for safety, privacy, basic self-care and non-intrusive relationships can be met. Safe Haven is a shelter consisting of 15 studio apartments, for people coming in off the streets to re-learn living skills and begin engaging in supportive services. Safe Haven served 49 individuals during 2000/2001. Matching funds to come from internal agency sources. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 6. Residential Self-Sufficiency Program ram 2 5,000 YWCA 322 East 300 South Funding for operational support for the program which offers transitional housing to low- income women in transition from homelessness or who are at risk of becoming homeless. Requested funding for 2002/2003 would go toward case management ($18,000) and utilities ($7,000). This program served 45 women during 2000/2001. Residents receive room board and case management services. They are required to pay a monthly fee, which starts at $225 and is increased to $270 over 18 months. The YWCA subsidizes up to 42% of the daily cost of services. Matching funds will come from resident fees, Salt Lake County ESG grants and private foundation donations. Application filed by nonprofit organization. I I I7. SL Interfaith Hospitality Network 15,000 802 West 800 South, SLC I Funding for program that provides shelter, food and assistance for homeless families. Requested funding for 2002/2003 would go toward salaries and wages of SLIHN staff. The Network consists of 77 local churches and synagogues (14 hosting and 63 support) I that provide program volunteers, accommodations and meals for three to five families for one week each. Families stay at hosting congregations for the evening meal, lodging, breakfast and bag lunch. During the day, the children go to school while the I adults go to work or look for housing. Matching funds would come from private donations. SLIHN served 372 individuals during 2000/2001. Application filed by nonprofit organization. II TOTAL ESG REQUESTS: $205,000 IAMOUNT OF GRANT: $171,000 I I kb I I I um mu ■m i i i ■i i i ZI i i i i i i i i i 2/5/0 SALT LAKE CIIIRIOPWA PROGRAM 1 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS 2002-2003 # ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION PRIOR REQUEST RECOMMENDATIONS AMOUNTS YEAR AMOUNT HIV/AID ENTITLE. MAYOR COUNCIL 1 Housing Authority of Salt Lake Funding for housing assistance for 35 116,000 01/02 184,703 117,000 112,000 117,000 City families/individuals that are HIV+or persons **79,000 00/01 1776 South West Temple living with AIDS, and administration. **79,000 99/00 Salt Lake City, UT 84115 **Funding from State of Utah 274,000 Total 2 Salt Lake Community Action Funding for short-term rental and mortgage 160,000 01/02 215,900 144,000 150,000 149,500 Program subsidies, non-refundable deposits,emergency **130,900 00/01 HIV/AIDS Short Term Housing utility payments, placement into permanent **21,400 99/00 764 South 200 West housing and support services for up to 150 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 people, and administration. **Funding from State of Utah 312,300 Total 3 Ogden Area Community Action Funding for scattered site transitional housing 0 01/02 122,324 0 0 - Program for 30 households in Davis&Weber Counties, 0 00/01 3159 Grant Avenue and administration. 0 99/00 Ogden, UT 84401 0 Total 4 Utah Nonprofit Housing Corp. Funding for project based rental subsidies **14,000 01/02 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 Robert Willey Apartments for 4 units of HIV/AIDS housing for 12 mos. **14,000 00/01 547 South 400 East **Has received funding through HASLC for **14,000 99/00 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 past two years in the amount of 14,000 each year with funding from the State since it was built in 1996. 42,000 Total 5 Utah AIDS Foundation Administration and supportive services for 150 10,000 01/02 75,010 0 0 10,000 persons living with HIV/AIDS to improve the 0 00/01 1408 South 1100 East housing stability and access to the HOPWA 0 99/00 Salt Lake City, UT 84105 program services. 10,000 Total 2/5/02 SALT LAKE CITY HOPWA PROGRAM 2 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS 2002-2003 ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION PRIOR REQUEST RECOMMENDATIONS AMOUNTS YEAR AMOUNT HIV/AID ENTITLE. MAYOR COUNCIL 6 Ogden Housing Authority Funding for housing assistance for 10 32,000 01/02 53,157 33,000 35,000 40,000 2661 Washington Blvd.#2 families/individuals that are HIV+or persons 0 00/01 Ogden, Utah 84401 living with AIDS, and administration. 0 99/00 32,000 Total 7 Davis County Housing Funding for housing assistance for 12-15 24,000 01/02 80,000 26,500 29,500 40,000 Authority families/individuals that are HIV+or persons 0 00/01 352 South 200 West, Suite#1 living with AIDS, and administration. 0 99/00 Farmington, Utah 84025 24,000 Total 8 Catholic Community Services Funding for short term housing assistance, 24,000 01/02 80,000 35,000 29,000 40,000 2570 West 1700 South and/or utility assistance for 30 clients in **47,500 00/01 Salt Lake City, UT 84104 Davis and Weber counties, and administration. **Funding from State of Utah for 2 years 71,500 Total 9 Kenyon Consulting Funding to act as Housing Coordinator for **15,000 01/02 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 P. O. Box 193 all HOPWA activities in the Salt Lake, Davis **14,600 00/01 Orem, Utah 84059 and Weber county areas. **Has received funding from the State for the past two years and will continue oversight for areas outside our MSA. 29,600 Total TOTALS 835,594 380,000 380,000 421,000 0 AVAILABLE ALLOCATION: 380,000 380,000 380,000 421,000 421,000 DIFFERENCE: 455,594 0 0 0 421,000 If more money was allocated-committees wanted funds split between the Northern Housing Authorities and CCS Northern Utah. 41,000 MS MP 1.10 I= Mil MI Ell MI IL Mil MINI OM IIIIII Mill OM MIN MI 11111 I IHousing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) IThe HOPWA grant program provides assistance through formula allocations to eligible states and metropolitan areas. The Salt Lake City/Ogden Metropolitan I Statistical Area (MSA) qualifies for funding for the year 2002-2003 due to the number of HIV/AIDS cases in the MSA. This area covering Salt Lake, Davis & Weber Counties now has more than 1500 cases of HIV/AIDS, with Salt Lake City I having the largest percentage within its boundaries. The grant amount is $421,000.00 for services provided in the three county area. I HOPWA provides housing assistance and supportive services for low-income persons with HIV/AIDS and their families. This assistance is designed to help eligible persons retain or gain access to appropriate housing where they can I maintain complex medication regimens and address HIV/AIDS-related problems. HOPWA funds may be used to assist all forms of housing designed to prevent homelessness including emergency housing, shared housing arrangements, Iapartments, single room occupancy (SRO) dwellings, and community residences. Appropriate supportive services must be provided as part of any HOPWA assisted housing, but HOPWA funds may also be used to provide Iservices independently of any housing activity. Salt Lake City has received proposals from nonprofit organizations located within 10 the eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). City staff has met with the entitlement entities located within this area that have a consolidated plan prepared, submitted, and approved in accordance with 24 CFR part 91 to Iaddress needs within their specific areas and have letters of support from their respective Mayors or administrations. ISalt Lake City has consulted broadly to develop a metropolitan-wide strategy for addressing the needs of persons with HIV/AIDS and their families living I throughout the MSA. We participate on the Statewide HIV/AIDS Housing Steering Committee to ensure all applications are consistent with the needs identified in the strategy for the MSA. The Steering Committee worked with Aids I Housing of Washington to update the State HIV/AIDS Housing Plan. This plan was published June 2001. I I el I I I HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PERSONS WITH AIDS (HOPWA) PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS (2002-2003) I 1. Housing Authority of Salt Lake City (HASLC) $184,703 I 1776 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah These funds will providel2 months of housing assistance for 35 people/families living with HIV/AIDS. These funds are used to reduce the financial burden for HIV+ persons I or persons living with AIDS who are active on the Section 8 waiting list. The HOPWA subsidy will provide short-term stability, during this interim period of up to 2 years, while waiting for the long-term subsidy provided by Section 8 housing assistance. The Iapplicants are referred by CAP as homeless or near homeless and will receive priority designation. Applicants who have been provided access to HIV/AIDS case management through UAF or who agree to participate in case management services Iwill also receive priority designation. HASLC is committed to partnering with other community service organizations to provide coordinated services or a "continuum of care" to these individuals/families. The receipt of the requested subsidy would allow the IHASLC to continue assisting the 24 families currently receiving assistance plus an additional 11 persons/households not currently receiving rental assistance under their existing HOPWA program. I Eligibility: Project- or tenant-based rental assistance, including assistance for shared housing arrangements. Filed by: Government Agency ki 2. Salt Lake Community Action Program (CAP) $215,900 P764 South 200 West, Salt Lake City, Utah This funding is to provide rental assistance payments to 150 people living with HIV/AIDS to live independently. The project combines limited short-term rental and I mortgage subsidies, non-refundable deposits, emergency utility payments, placement into permanent housing and housing supportive services. $160,000 of the request is for direct client assistance and 55,900 for staff support and administration. Services I provided after an assessment of the housing situation that has caused the housing crisis or homelessness is made with the participant, a joint plan of action is made to address and solve the problems. These plans generally address current and potential I sources of income, longer-term housing subsidies, and home maintenance and money management issues. CAP is the main source for housing referral in the State from all of the case management and medical groups that deal with HIV/AIDS clients. These I include U of U Clinic 1A, IHC Salt Lake Clinic, Dept. of Veteran Affairs, UAF, CHAMP, Catholic Community Services and the Department of Health. CAP has been the key HUD approved Housing Counseling Agency for 16 years. I Eligibility: Housing information services & Short-term rent, mortgage and utility payments to prevent the homelessness of the tenant or mortgagor of a dwelling Filed by: Nonprofit Organization Housing Opportunities For Persons With Aids(HOPWA)Project Descriptions 1 i 10/2/01 —Fiscal Year 2002-2003 3. Ogden Area Community Action Agency, Inc. $122,324 ' 3159 Grant Avenue, Ogden, Utah This request is for funding to develop and implement the Scattered Site Transitional — ' Housing Program for Persons Living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH). The purpose of the program is to provide direct assistance that enables qualified households to live in decent, safe & sanitary housing and have access to supportive services needed to live independently. To qualify at lease one member of the household will be living with HIV/AIDS diagnosis and currently homeless or at-risk of homelessness. $26,312 would pay the salary & benefits for a Housing Counselor, travel, conferences & administration with the remaining $96,012 to be used for rental assistance for 30 households @ $266.70 per month for 12 months. The housing units are located throughout Davis and Weber Counties. The program counselor along with HIV/AIDS case manager and the client will develop a plan that will address overcoming barriers, increase household income and obtain and remain in permanent housing. Eligibility: Housing information services and tenant-based rental assistance. , Filed by: Nonprofit organization 4. The Robert Willey Apartments, LLC $17,500 Salt Lake City, Utah The funding requested for this project includes $17,500 in continued rental subsidies for a project currently providing on-going housing for low income terminally ill homeless. ' The project has been providing four rental units for people living with HIV and/or AIDS and their families since the original HOPWA funding for renovations in1996. Additional funds have been given for subsidies from the State as well as SLC through the Housing 401 Authority of Salt Lake City. This funding is estimated to extend low-income housing to 4-6 qualified tenants over the next 12 months. The Utah AIDS Foundation and Salt Lake Community Action Program have provided and will continue to provide the expertise and support services to the project to supplement the rental subsidy available to the tenants. The funds will consist of subsidies of$1358 per month for all 4 units with the maximum rent of$525. It also allows for a small contingency in the event fair market increases. This allows the tenant portion to not exceed 30% of their adjusted income or 10% of their gross income which ever is higher. Eligibility: Project Based Rental Assistance Filed by: Nonprofit organization 5. Utah Aids Foundation (UAF) $75,010 , 1408 South 1100 East, Salt Lake City, UT Funding is requested for housing information services and resource identification to develop a collection of interventions intended to improve the stability of 150 HOPWA participants in housing or accessing housing resources by addressing their complex needs. The creative interventions and services may include intensive social services and the provision of"move-in" cleaning supply kits. The proposal is especially supportive of HIV medical care providers, the case management system, and the housing authorities that are struggling with some complex client situations and need 111 services to which they can refer participants. Eligibility: Housing Information Services and Resource Identification Housing Opportunities For Persons With Aids(HOPWA)Project Descriptions 2 10/2/01—Fiscal Year 2002-2003 i I IFiled by: Nonprofit organization I 6. Ogden Housing Authority $53,157 2661 Washington Blvd., Suite 102, Ogden, Utah Requested funds are to provide twelve months of housing assistance for 10 I people/families. The waiting list at the Ogden Housing Authority that serves both Ogden and Weber County for Section 8 housing assistance is 2 years. The Ogden Housing Authority proposes to provide the HOPWA subsidy to reduce the financial I burden for HIV+ persons or people living with AIDS who are active on the Section 8 waiting list. This subsidy will provide short-term stability, during this interim period of up to 2 years, while waiting for the long-term subsidy provided by Section 8 housing Iassistance. Clients will pay approximately 30% of their income for rent when they choose a unit I within reasonable rent limitations. The program allows clients to choose where they want to live in Ogden and Weber County providing access to services, family and friends. Applicants referred by CCS as homeless or near homeless or who have been I provided access to HIV/AIDS case management through Utah AIDS Foundation or agree to participate in case management services will receive priority designation. $49,680 will be used for housing assistance payments for 10 families for 12 months with I the balance of$3,477 for administrative expenses for program oversight. Eligibility: Tenant based rental assistance Filed by: Governmental Housing Agency 1111 7. Davis County Housing Authority (DCHA) $80,000 352 South 200 West, Suite #1, Farmington, Utah I These funds will be used for a Section 8 Voucher type assistance program. Participants will pay 30% of their adjusted income for rent and utilities and must choose a unit within rent limitations set by HUD and DCHA. The program allows participants to choose Iwhere they want to live within Davis County providing access to services, family and friends. It is anticipated these funds will assist 12 to 15 families/households during the grant year. I Participants will be required to abide byall Section 8 Voucher Program rules and p q g regulations, sign a lease for one year and the landlord must sign the HUD required Ilease addendum and Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) Contract. IThe waiting list at DCHA for Section 8 housing assistance is 18-24 months. This program will provide the HOPWA subsidy to reduce the financial burden for HIV+ persons or persons living with AIDS who are active on the Section 8 waiting list. The I funds will provide short-term stability, while waiting for the long-term subsidy provided by Section 8 housing assistance. $74,400 will be used for 13 families at $462 per family for 12 months. The remaining $5,600 will be used for program oversight. IEligibility: Tenant Based Rental Assistance 14111 Filed by: Governmental Housing Agency Housing Opportunities For Persons With Aids(HOPWA)Project Descriptions 3 I 10/2/01—Fiscal Year 2002-2003 I 8. Catholic Community Services — Northern Utah (CCS) $80,000 I 2570 West 1700 South, Salt Lake City, Utah This funding is for short-term housing opportunity for persons living with AIDS that I includes up to $1,500 or four months of rental and utility assistance in crisis situations and also avails the client access to Ryan White program funding to include emergency assistance up to $500 per year per client. It is anticipated this funding will provide I assistance for 30 clients in Davis and Weber Counties during the one-year grant period. Last year this program served 58 clients, 7 were from Davis County and 34 from Weber County. I Assistance ranges from short-term direct rental assistance toward securing housing to tenant-based rental assistance for a period of up to four months. Services include I supported housing assistance to prevent homelessness of a tenant or mortgage holder, emergency payments (utilities, non-refundable security deposit payments) and/or supportive services to maintain the individual in their dwelling with a maximum of$1,500 I per client per program year. Referrals come through Clinic 1A, The Utah Aids Foundation and CHAMPS consultants for health management. CCS is currently developing partnerships with Davis and Ogden Housing Authorities for permanent I placement for their clients. Additionally they are actively engaged on the state HOPWA Steering Committee, the Utah Housing Coalition, and other local and state agencies in providing a continuum of housing options for persons with HIV/AIDS. I Eligibility: Short Term Rental Subsidy and Supportive Services Filed by: Nonprofit Organization 9. Kenyon Consulting $7,000.00 el P. O. Box 1903, Orem, Utah This request is for a Housing Coordinator for all HOPWA activities. Kenyon Consulting I has been involved with the HOPWA Steering Committee since it's creation in 1997 and has been under contract with the State of Utah for the past two years. Technical assistance to the City in development of housing opportunities for HOPWA clients will I be the main objective of this program. In addition, this person will coordinate activities between city and state; work with Subgrantees to resolve design problems for newly developed HOPWA housing programs, identify for-profit and non-profit developers that I can assist in the development of affordable housing for HOPWA clients. The coordinator has been heavily involved in the development of the Statewide Housing I Plan and would be responsible for assisting both the City and State in the accomplishment of goals and objectives outlined in this plan. I Eligibility: Resource Identification as well as Administrative Expenses Filed by: For Profit Entity TOTAL AMOUNT OF REQUESTS: $835,594 TOTAL GRANT AMOUNT ANTICIPATED: $421,000 i ei Housing Opportunities For Persons With Aids(HOPWA)Project Descriptions 4 10/2/01—Fiscal Year 2002-2003 IUTAH (Inset)-Metropolitan Areas,Counties,and Selected Places I la nr i ....../ WEBER • I Ogden SALT LAKE CITY-OLDEN A0011116„,41IN Clearfield O 1 Layton DAVIS 41• 141• ' � ' Bountiful• I. Salt Lake City. 10. 0 I . West Valley e •Milieresk TeylonvHle-Ben ton Kearns• ® •Murray I *Cottonwood Heights West Jordan• e Sandy ISALT LAKE LEGEND I aetra Metropolitan statistical area NASA) tir . Q Place of 100,000 to 249.999 inhabitants e Place of 50.000 to 99.999 i nlnabirents I . Place of 25,000 to 49.999 inhabitants 0 MSA central city of fewer then 26,000 inhabitants State capital underlined Metropolitan area boundaries and names are thorn defined by the Federal Office al I 0 10 SCALE Management end Budget on June 30,1993.AN a other boundaries end nem areas of 20 30 Kilometers January 1,1990. I I 0 10 20 30 Miles I IlliP 1 11r U.S.DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economics and Statistics Administration Bureau of the Census IC-70 Appendix C English and Spanish is provided after normal museum hours for six-week periods. 125 families including 270 persons are expected to be served with the funding. Application filed by a nonprofit organization. 9. Community Health Centers 150,000 Rose Park Clinic: 1365 West 100 North Central City Clinic: 461 South 400 East This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for three staff positions, medical supplies, x-rays, free patient medication and patient education. Community Health Centers anticipates providing 1300 family practice health care appointments to 370 Salt Lake City uninsured, low-income residents. They also anticipate providing 381 dental care appointments to 212 Salt Lake City uninsured, low-income persons in Salt Lake City with special health care needs who face barriers to health care access. In 1999, Community Health Centers served 12,401 Salt Lake City residents through more than 42,858 primary care appointments and 2,871 Salt Lake City residents through 5,555 dental care appointments. 99% of their clients have incomes at or below the federal poverty level; 55% are single mothers and 39% are children. The cost of the average medical encounter is$93.21; the cost of the average dental encounter is$87.15. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 10. Crossroads Emergency Food Pantry • 14,000 Crossroads Urban Center Program 347 South 400 East This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for one staff position for a food pantry that works to help meet the needs of the homeless, destitute and low-income families. This program also offers counseling on the availability of food stamps, shelters, TANF, WIC and other social service programs. This program is unique in that it also specializes in meeting the needs of infants and their families with formula, baby food, diapers and other resources. Crossroads also assists people in meeting their needs for gasoline, prescriptions, bus tokens and funding to prevent evictions and utility shut-offs. A 30% increase in demand for services is expected during the next year, placing the number of household members served at approximately 46,000 people. Food distributions served 36,075 people in 1999. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 11. Family Support Center—Crisis Nursery 10,000 2020 South Lake Street This request is for administrative costs for house parent salaries for a program that provides short-term crisis care to children ages 13 and under who are at risk for abuse or neglect. Services are provided free or on a sliding scale based on income and family size. A new family counseling program offers family therapy, parenting classes and stress management classes. Last year, the number of referrals to the Division of Family Services for child abuse exceeded 17,150. Approximately 32% of the investigations resulted in substantiation of abuse. Statistically, another substantial incident of child abuse occurs within our community every 90 minutes. Last year the Family Support Center provided services to 705 low- income children who were Salt Lake City residents. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 12. First Step House—Administrative support 35,230 411 Grant Street This request is for funding for the design and purchase of a computer system and database, to update systems for Breathalyzer and urine screening of clients, and to purchase supplies and materials associated with these systems. This program provides substance abuse treatment services to clients on both a residential and outpatient basis. Many of these clients are homeless. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 13. Guadalupe Center Educational Programs — Early Learning Center 44,000 340 South Goshen This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for one staff position, and for rent, custodial expenses, building maintenance, insurance, utilities, telephones, security, educational supplies and technological upgrades for a program that provides preschool and home visits serving low-income children and families. This preschool is an early intervention program for at-risk children from birth to age eight and their families. Trained staff coach parents in positive parent/child 9 interactions and ways to foster a child's normal development- physically, socially, emotionally, and intellectually. At ages 3-5 children attend the site-based preschool. They are currently serving up to 90 parents and 140 children who are low-income and live in inner-city neighborhoods afflicted with high criminal and gang activity. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 14. LifeCare Services —Security Light and Lock Project 50,000 Community Services Council Program 1025 South 700 West This request is for administrative costs, for a program that provides home safety Information, inspections and modifications. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 15. Literacy Volunteers of America —Adult Literacy & ESL 49,108 175 North 600 West Funding for a program that recruits and trains volunteers who tutor adults to read, write and comprehend English as a Second Language as well as basic survival skills for refugees who need pre-literacy and survival skills. The overall goal of the program is to help refugee families integrate culturally, socially, and economically. The number proposed to be served by this funding is 556 people. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 16. Neighborhood House—Van Purchase 50,000 1050 W 500 South This request is for funding for the purchase of two vans to transport low-income children to child day care and to transport adults to a day center. Over 200 children are provided services during the school year, while 120 adult clients are served weekly with the van transport. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 17. Oulessebougou-Utah Alliance—Cultural education trunks 13,000 10 West 100 South, Suite 605 This request is for funding of cultural education trunks to be distributed to eligible schools for second grade teachers to use in the state-approved social studies curriculum. The program seeks to work in a partnership with villagers of Oulessebougou, Mali, West Africa to achieve their economic, health care and community objectives, and to provide the opportunity for both cultures to learn from each other. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 18. Our House Day Care Center 165,045 Our House Childcare & Family Education 353 West 200 South This request is for administrative costs to include salaries, taxes and benefits for six staff positions, to purchase children's health care supplies, and to fund construction costs for an office space for an organization that provides child care services to homeless and low-income children. This center operates to provide a preschool program to homeless and low-income children, ranging in ages from birth to five years. Almost all of the enrolled families are at, or below, 50% of the area median income. One of the Center's major goals is to provide stability in the lives of these disadvantaged children by providing a reliable, consistent setting. The educational component for all classrooms focuses on each child's social, emotional and cognitive development. All teachers are required to have or obtain a current Child Development Associates degree, therefore, requiring the Center to pay a salary equivalent to the upper range of pay for daycare providers. It is anticipated this program will provide services to 42 children during the next year. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 19. People Helping People 37,988 175 South Main Street #480 Funding for program materials and workbooks for a program that provides support to single parents by helping them create economic freedom for themselves and their families. The purpose of the program is to help families make the transition from welfare to work, help the working poor find family sustaining employment and to provide local area employers and the community with the advantages that a supported and networked workforce offers. Of the 106 clients served last year, 71 are currently working, 10 6 have moved out of state, 2 are in school, 9 recently left their jobs, and17 are working with their mentors to complete tasks and develop employment skills. It is anticipated that 160 new clients will benefit from this program during the next year if funding is received. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 20. Prevent Child Abuse Utah -Child Abuse Prevention Program 22,530 331 South Rio Grande #304 Funding for supplies and equipment for a program sponsored by Prevent Child Abuse Utah to provide a comprehensive program to elementary schools to help prevent child abuse. Under this program, children are taught what abuse is, given prevention strategies, including personal body safety rules, and motivated into action if threatened or victimized. Children are also taught that abuse is never the fault of the child and the need to tell a trusted adult is stressed. This program is violence prevention, not sex education and has been approved by the Salt Lake City School District Human Sexuality and Maturation Curriculum Committee. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 21. Rape Recovery Center—Crisis Intervention Services 40,150 2035 South 1300 East This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for five staff positions for a program that provides counseling services to rape victims. Funding is also requested for utilities, telephones, insurance, supplies, and mileage expenses. It has provided services to more than 50,000 sexual assault victims since it was established in 1974. Last year the Rape Recovery Center provided direct client service to 2250 new clients, and returning client services 844 times, an 11% increase over the previous year. In addition to providing crisis intervention services, the Rape Recovery Center refers clients to other services for long-term therapeutic counseling. This is the only not-for-profit, independent, no-fee agency of its kind in Utah. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 22. Housing Outreach Rental Program 37,000 Salt Lake Community Action Program Citywide in CD eligible areas This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for two staff positions, for a program to assist low/mod income families in obtaining safe, affordable housing and to increase the number of low cost apartments available. This program will assist 1000 low-income families living in Salt Lake City by listing 800 low to moderately priced rental units and will provide a one-time partial payment of one month's rent expense per family, when available, to avoid immediate eviction or homeless relocation assistance when no other resources or assistance exist. This program also helps individuals understand their rights and responsibilities as renters and provides relocation services to those individuals living in large apartment complexes and hotels who will be displaced because of demolition and/or uninhabitable housing conditions. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 23. Northwest Emergency Food Pantry 27,500 Salt Lake Community Action Program 1300 West 300 North This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for two staff positions, for a program that provides food and social services to people in emergency situations. Food orders are filled to meet nutritional needs sufficient to feed the household for three days. Each of these households can access these services six times in a twelve-month period. The Northwest Emergency Food Pantry is a program of the Community Action Program, which not only provides emergency services, but also provides comprehensive services that help people become more self-sufficient. It served more than 3,800 unduplicated households during the last fiscal year. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 24. Tenant Maintenance Project 12,500 Salt Lake Community Action Program 764 South 200 West This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for two staff ill positions, for a program that provides low-income tenants with home maintenance/money management training. This project would provide 50 households (150 people) living in Salt Lake City with home 11 maintenance and budget/money management training. The project will provide training sessions to low- income households that are in jeopardy of losing their subsidized housing unit or those who are having a hard time making financial ends meet and/or not living up to their rental obligations. It will also provide a counseling program that will work with the families as a support system, helping these families to identify and eliminate their personal, social, financial and employment barriers in order to maintain their housing unit. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 25. Salt Lake Donated Dental Services 39,500 415 West 400 South Funding to purchase dental equipment, anesthetic products and office supplies for a program that provides dental services to very low-income and homeless persons. The services provided include exams, fillings and cleaning, root canals, periodontal treatments, oral surgery, extractions, dentures, crown/bridge work and orthodontist referrals. Salt Lake Donated Dental is the only organization of its kind in the city. It is anticipated that comprehensive dental care will be provided to 7200 different patients during the next year. Over 200 licensed, board certified dentists and registered dental hygienists volunteer to provide this dental service. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 26. Neighborhood Self-Help Grant 18,000 Salt Lake City Housing and Neighborhood Development Citywide in eligible areas Funding the provide grants to eligible community councils for preparing and distributing letters and agendas. Application filed by City Housing and Neighborhood Development Division. 27. Crime Prevention/Neighborhood Improvements 79,780 Salt Lake City Police Department Program Citywide in CD eligible areas This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for two staff positions, to operate SLC Police Department programs that educate residents on crime prevention. The Crime Prevention Unit of the Police Department oversees such programs as Mobile Neighborhood Watch, Lady Beware, Senior Safety, Business and Residential Security Checks, Gang Prevention, and the C.O.P. (Community Oriented Policing) program. Crime prevention officers identify the areas in need of attention and coordinate with citizens, government agencies and other organizations needed to ensure successful projects. Application filed by Salt Lake City Police Department. 28. Mobile Neighborhood Watch Program 10,000 Salt Lake City Police Department Program 327 East 200 South Funding to purchase equipment including magnetic vehicle placards, vests, radio batteries, scanner batteries, office supplies and duplication materials for a program that provides support to the SLC Police Department by reporting suspicious activities and being a visible deterrent to crime. Mobile Neighborhood Watch volunteers coordinate with the Police Department to patrol their own neighborhoods and notify the police of suspicious or criminal activity. Volunteers also work to train new volunteers interested in the program. Application filed by Salt Lake City Police Department. 29. Community Shelter and Self-Sufficiency Program 126,000 The Road Home (formerly Traveler's Aid Society) 210 South Rio Grande This request is for administrative costs for salary, taxes and benefits for seven staff positions for Travelers Aid Society to operate the men's/women's and family shelters. Their mission is to provide people with emergency assistance and opportunities to take steps out of homelessness and help them make the transition to independent living. Travelers Aid serves approximately 400 men, women and families with children each day. Programs include emergency assistance, case management, self-sufficiency plans, and transitional housing. The self-sufficiency program provides a structure, in addition to basic shelter, that assists participants in achieving self-sufficiency. The program includes supportive services such as 110 case management, employment assistance, support and counseling groups, adult education, volunteer opportunities and children's activities. In FY 99-00, Travelers Aid Society served 1521 men, 97 women, 12 and 119 families with 208 adults and 271 children, with an average of 400 people per night. During this same time frame, 44 families and 29 individuals moved out of the shelter and into transitional housing. An additional 126 individuals and two families moved into permanent housing. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 30. Utah Nonprofit Housing Corporation (UNPHC) 40,000 765 South 200 East#A This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for three staff positions, including the business manager, accountant and office clerk positions. UNPHC along with its affiliated nonprofit housing corporations has developed 656 units of affordable housing for elderly persons, low income persons, persons with disabilities, the homeless, the chronically mentally ill and those with HIV/AIDS in Salt Lake City. Another 41 units are currently under construction for lower income elderly persons. It is anticipated that 900 Salt Lake City residents, through more than 650 housing units, will benefit from this project. Utah Nonprofit's focus is to develop and provide quality, cost-effective housing, with rents affordable to persons at or below 50% of the area median income. They work closely with community groups and other nonprofit organizations to provide supportive services, housing referrals and case management for their clients. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 31. Young Refugees of Utah for World Peach 25,000 Utah Peace Institute 221 South 1200 East This request is for funding of administrative costs to include a portion of salary, supplies, mileage and office equipment for a program that provides services to refugee and immigrant youth, offering a welcome network for youth in local schools, community outreach involving youth in community service, leadership training, and after school activities. Application filed by organization in the process of applying for nonprofit status. 32.Wasatch Community Gardens —Youth & Community Gardens 15,000 350 S 400 East, Suite 101 B This request is for administrative costs to include a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for one staff position for a program that provides a food source for low-income people by operating community garden.:> in eligible areas. In the Youth Gardening program, more than 800 inner-city youth plant, tend, harvest and sell or donate organic produce to the low-income as they learn responsibility, commitment and cooperation. In the Community Gardening Program, more than 60 families grew fresh food for themselves or others in need. All four of the community gardens are located on previously vacant lots in inner-city neighborhoods. It is anticipated that this program will provide services to 900 people during the next year. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 33. YMCA -After School and Summer Enrichment Program 18,000 210 South Rio Grande Funding for operational support for a program coordinator, program leaders, arts and crafts supplies, admission fees, and van upkeep and gasoline for a program that provides structure, supervision and educational/recreational activities during after school hours for homeless children residing at the Community Shelter and Self-Sufficiency Center. The children will be picked up at the shelter each day after school (including summer school) and transported to a designated location (community center or boys and girls club) for that day's activities. Art, sports, games, reading, nature exploration and field trips are incorporated into the weekly schedule. The program focuses on building confidence, teaching social skills and manners, and establishing caring relationships with these children. This program allows the parents to focus on job training, counseling and/or employment opportunities. It is anticipated that 100 children will benefit from this program during the next year. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 34. Salt Lake Community Development Corp. —Affordability Project 40,000 501 East 1700 South Funding for administrative support for a portion of salary, taxes and benefits for two staff positions, office supplies, equipment and utilities, travel and vehicle maintenance for a program which acquires building 13 materials through donation or low-cost purchases for use in building affordable housing in Salt Lake City as well as statewide. TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICE REQUESTS $1,471,014 7. PUBLIC SERVICE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS REQUESTED AMOUNTS 1. "and Justice for all" - Community Legal Center technology 90,700 Legal Aid Society Offer made on proposed site Funding to purchase telecommunications hardware, cable and network for a collaborative effort project between the Legal Aid Society, the Disability Law Center, the Multi-Cultural Legal Center, Utah Legal Services and the "And Justice for All" program to provide legal services to low-income people by co- locating the primary legal providers. The partner agencies provide outreach, education, and legally based advocacy to help these low-income citizens in areas of basic need like food, shelter, and income. The intent is to locate a site on a main line for public transportation in an area providing easy accessibility. In 1999, legal services were provided to more than 16,000 individuals, but another 11,568 received no assistance or limited assistance. It is anticipated that this project would benefit between 16,000 and 20,000 individuals. Application filed by nonprofit organizations. 2.Artspace —Furnishings for dance floor and classrooms 50,000 Institute for Art and Imagination 200 South and 500 West Funding to create and furnish permanent classroom space and a dance studio for a program that offers year-round classes for children ages 7 to 18 in the Bridges Project, with over 300 children to be served with the improvements. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 3.Asian Association - Parking Lot and Roof Repair 25,000 1600 South Major Street Funding for building improvements to include construction of a parking lot with a storm drainage system and minimal landscaping for a program that provides mental health counseling, drug and alcohol prevention and treatment services, English classes, and parenting classes for refugees. This program provides a service that allows refugees to integrate into the community while maintaining their cultural identity. Refugees suffer not only from language barriers and cultural differences but many also suffer from the loss of family and personal support groups. This program also provides refugee employment referrals and community outreach to refugees. The Asian Association is the only licensed counseling facility with refugee language capabilities. It is anticipated this program will benefit 1,800 low-income individuals during the next year. Application filed by a nonprofit organization. 4.The Children's Museum of Utah —Teen Enrichment Center 300,000 100 South and Rio Grande Funding to support construction costs of a new facility to be located in the Gateway area. CDBG funds will be used for the new Teen Enrichment Center, which will provide a technology-rich, safe environment for underserved youth ages 10 to 18 to help provide them with the necessary foundation for positive growth and development. This Center will provide youth with opportunities to interact and create a multi- media environment and will feature a video and sound studio, computers and a radio station. Youth will be mentored by community artists in the creation of videos, photographs, sound and music recordings, website development, desktop publishing and radio programming. The center will function on a drop-in basis and offer structured project-based programs. It is anticipated this program will benefit approximately 700 low-income youth on an annual basis. Application filed by a nonprofit organization. 14 5. 10th East Senior Center Landscaping 59,425 East Central Community Council Funding to redesign and install new landscaping in front of senior center, located at 237 South 1000 East, to include sprinkler system, sidewalks, and low-maintenance plantings. Application filed by community council. 6. First Step House—Transitional housing parking lot 9,500 First Step House Funding for driveway and parking lot renovation for a program that provides substance abuse treatment services to clients on both a residential and outpatient basis. Many of these clients are homeless. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 7. Nettie Gregory Center— Interior and exterior improvements 46,000 724 West South Temple Funding for building improvements for a program that offers services to disadvantaged individuals and at- risk youth. The building is currently being used for four hours each day to host a life skills program that serves court-involved youth in the community and will be used to house the Poplar Grove Boys and Girls Club programs during the construction of the new club. The building improvements requested include interior and exterior improvements: floor tile, paint and drywall, weather-stripping, new water heater, parking lot repair and new parking lot lights. It is anticipated that approximately 500 people will be served at the Center during the next year. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 8. Rape Recover Center—Building renovation 35,800 2035 South 1300 East Funding to replace windows and add stucco to exterior walls for a program that provides counseling services to rape victims. It has provided services to more than 50,000 sexual assault victims since it was established in 1974. Last year the Rape Recovery Center provided direct client service to 2250 new clients, and returning client services 844 times, an 11% increase over the previous year. In addition to providing crisis intervention services, the Rape Recovery Center refers clients to other services for long- term therapeutic counseling. This is the only not-for-profit, independent, no-fee agency of its kind in Utah. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 9. Salvation Army — Renovating bathrooms 8,683 252 South 500 East Funding for removal of old flooring and installing new floor in bathroom and shower facilities for a program that provides a residential alcohol/drug treatment program for adult men and women with substance abuse problems and those with who are dually diagnosed with both substance abuse and mental health concerns. This facility has the capacity to house 108 residents and support a staff of 30. Application filed by a nonprofit organization. 11. Special Contingency Fund 10,000 SLC Housing and Neighborhood Development 451 South State Street Funding to provide building improvement grants to nonprofit organizations who provide services to low/moderate-income persons when the nonprofit organization experiences an emergency situation such as a leaking roof, plumbing problems or other emergency situations that might significantly impair their ability to meet the needs of their clients. All requests for this funding will be reviewed and administered by the staff of Housing and Neighborhood Development (HAND). Federal regulations require a public review process of all projects awarded funding. This special contingency fund would provide a pool of funds that could be used to assist the local nonprofit organizations with their emergency needs since it will have gone through the public review process. Application filed by SLC Housing and Neighborhood Development. 15 12. Utah Alcoholism Foundation —Kitchen remodel 104,200 209 Douglas Street—Mothers and Children Center Funding for a project to renovate kitchen and floor coverings, construct access ramp and reconfigure bath for ADA for a program which provides residential substance abuse treatment for women and their dependent children with a capacity of 17 persons. Services include, treatment, housing, meals, parenting classes, case management, life skills training, and support and referral services. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 13. Utah Alcoholism Foundation —Carpet, window coverings, parking lot 13,960 1006 East 100 South — House of Hope Funding for a project to install new carpet, window coverings and repair the driveway for a program that provides residential substance abuse treatment for women and their dependent children with a capacity of 33 persons. Services include, treatment, housing, meals, parenting classes, case management, life skills training, and support and referral services. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 14. Utah Food Bank 31,500 Community Services Council Program 1025 South 700 West Funding to purchase storage racks to organize food for delivery for program that provides food for low/moderate-income and homeless individuals. The Utah Food Bank fights hunger in Utah by serving as the central collection and distribution center for donated food. They currently provide food to 90 agencies and programs within Salt Lake City, and over 200 agencies within the state. Application filed by nonprofit organization. 15.Volunteers of America - Detoxification Center 16,892 252 West Brooklyn Avenue Funding for building improvements for program that provides a 60-bed alcohol/drug detoxification center where clients are taught to take responsibility for their lives and to break the cycle of drug and alcohol addiction. Clients are screened for medical problems, attend daily meetings, participate in case management and are referred to treatment programs. Building improvements include reconstruction of front and east parking lots, install 3 awnings, purchase and install two signs and provide landscaping around the facility. Application filed by nonprofit organization. TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS $801,660 8. PLANNING REQUESTED AMOUNTS 1. Sugar House Community Study for Historic Nomination 43,000 Salt Lake City Planning Division 1700 South and 2700 South, between 500/700 East and 1300 East Funding to complete the steps required for the nomination process of designation as National Register Historic District for the Sugar House Business District. This is a continuation of the 27th Year project funded by $10,000. These steps include reconnaissance level surveys, identification of significant buildings, establishment of boundary lines for the district, and intensive level surveys of selected significant buildings to complete the nomination process. There are approximately 2,394 properties in the area. Application filed Salt Lake City Planning Division. 2. Sugar House Business District Small Area Plan 45,000 Salt Lake City Planning Division Funding for a small area plan that will address multi-modes of transportation, including identifying the location and route for a future light rail station, parking circulation, new street patterns, mobility patterns within and around blocks prior to new development, and capital improvement cost estimates for streetscape enhancements. Application filed by Salt Lake City Planning Division. 16 3.Wasatch Plunge Community Recreation Center Study 85,000 840 North 300 West Salt Lake City Planning Division Funding to study the feasibility of renovating the Wasatch Plunge building (currently housing the Children's Museum of Utah) including the pool area, for use as a community recreation center for the Capitol Hill community. Existing Warm Springs Park facilities, such as the tennis courts, could be used in conjunction with the renovated structure. The study would include the feasibility of utilizing the warm springs in the design of the new pool. The project would include development of a preliminary design layout, construction design, physical renovation and possible expansion of the structure. This building is listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources and is owned by the city. The Children's Museum will be vacating the building in the next two years, and relocating to the Gateway area. The relocation of the Children's Museum will provide an opportunity to reuse this historic building for its original use as a community center with aquatic facilities. Application filed by Salt Lake City Planning Division. 4. Rose Park Commercial Node Infrastructure Improvement Study 25,000 900 West approximately between 1000 North and 900 North Salt Lake City Planning Division Funding to design infrastructure improvements to improve circulation, safety and aesthetics, including bus stops, sidewalks, crosswalks, street lighting, signage, street trees and landscaping for this important gateway into the neighborhood. Application filed by Salt Lake City Planning Division. 5. Master Planning and Concept Development for Parley's Creek Corridor Development 30,000 Wasatch Front Resource Conservation and Development Council Funding to develop a master plan for the Parley's Creek corridor with the objectives of reconnecting communities, providing access to destinations, increase neighborhood safety and providing multiple recreation experiences. TOTAL PLANNING REQUESTS $228,000 9. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (10) REQUESTED AMOUNTS 1. Salt Lake City Revolving Loan Fund 400,000 Salt Lake City Community & Economic Development Funding to provide low-cost loans to assist small business owners develop their businesses and taking the next step in continuing to grow their businesses. Other private and public partners will be encouraged to participate to leverage these funds. Administrative support services would include credit verification, employment status verification, screening of applicant businesses, specific outreach, legal services, and office and staff support. 2, North Temple Corridor Economic Revitalization Plan 40,000 Westside Alliance 622 W 500 North Funding for salaries, benefits, and operational support to develop an action for implementation of the North Temple Corridor Economic Revitalization Plan to strengthen existing businesses, encourage new businesses to relocate and stimulate an entrepreneurial spirit. Application filed by nonprofit organization. TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $440,000 17 10. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION REQUESTED AMOUNTS Continuum of Care Coordinator 20,000 Utah issues 331 South Rio Grande, Suite 60 Funding to support administrative costs of program tat coordinates homeless plans and services throughout the County, and writes the annual Continuum of Care grant application to HUD. Activities funded will include organizing the annual Continuum of Care process, collect data to determine service needs, determine gaps and prioritize needs in the homeless car system, compile gaps analysis information HUD and County committees and service providers and develop short and long term strategies. Application filed by nonprofit organization. -11. CITY ADMINISTRATION Funding for CDBG functions necessary to administer the grant. City Attorney's Office 55,432 Community Affairs 41,998 Environmental Assessments 55,640 Finance 43,680 Housing and Neighborhood Development 422,694 Office of Neighborhood Services 49,711 Property Management 48,287 TOTAL CITY ADMINISTRATION REQUESTS $717,442 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION REQUESTS $737,442 12. PERCENT FOR ART REQUESTED AMOUNTS Percent for Arts 3,000 To provide enhancements such as decorative pavement, railings, sculptures, fountains and other works of art. 1% of project construction cost is allocated for art projects. 13. CONTINGENCY REQUESTED AMOUNTS Contingency Fund 80,000 Funds set aside to cover unanticipated cost over-runs on approved construction projects. TOTAL CDBG REQUESTS $9,463,116 ANTICIPATED CDBG GRANT AVAILABLE 4,854,000 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR REALLOCATION 163,800 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 5,017,800 18