Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
02/21/1989 - Minutes
PROCE.L*DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIZP UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of the Whole on Tuesday, February 21, 1989, at 5:00 p.m. in Suite 300, City Hall, 324 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Florence Bittner Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Willie Stoler Sydney Fonnesbeck Council Chairperson Stoler presided at the meeting. Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Councilmember Horrocks asked what Director, reviewed the schedule the benefit of such a meeting for the Council/Staff retreat on would be and Councilmember February 25, 1989, asking the Fonnesbeck said that even though Council to highlight problems or the bid would be submitted under suggestions they had regarding the Salt Lake City' s name, it would be retreat. a partnership with other cities. She said that because Park City Councilmember Bittner informed the would host so many activities, it Council that Mike Chitwood, Rede- might be nice to get to know each velopment Agency (RDA) Director, other better. Councilmember wanted to call an extra meeting of Bittner said she didn' t have a the RDA Board of Directors on problem with a get together as March 2, 1989, to discuss funding long as it was on a social level for a new sports arena. Coun- and not an official meeting to cilmember Godfrey suggested wait- discuss venues. ing until the scheduled meeting of March 9 since the Legislature Mr. Lee King informed the Council would have decided the issue by that he had distributed materials March 2. from different Olympic committees to the Council and that the synop- Councilmember Fonnesbeck said that sis of the Technical Committee' s Park City' s City Council wanted to report on venue selection was meet with the Salt Lake City important. He said the Communica- Council in order to become more tion Committee had prepared a involved in the Olympic bid pro- question and answer sheet of the cess and to get to know the Coun- most commonly asked questions cil on a more informal basis. She about the bid. suggested an informal gathering over breakfast or lunch. Coun- Ms. Gust-Jenson said the position cilmember Bittner said it might be of Community Relations Coordinator more appropriately handled by the had been advertised and the formal official Olympic Committee. She hiring process had begun. She said the City Council didn't have then reviewed the agenda. an official role in the bid pro- cess and shouldn't act as though Mr. King reviewed the changes made they did. Councilmember Stoler to the early retirement ordinance said the Council needed to be saying that the ordinance reflect- careful not to offend other gov- ed the Mayor' s current policy for ernment agencies involved such as the most part. He said Section E Ogden and Summit County. of the ordinance corresponded with 89-46 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 "Plan D. 1" of the policy and that Councilmember Godfrey asked why Section F of the ordinance corre- the position needed to be a perma- sponded with "Plan D.2" of the nent FTE. Mr. King said that the Mayor' s policy. He said that the supervisor would take responsibil- substantive changes were made in ity as the maintenance supervisor relation to the early retirement at the Airport course when needed. policy for public safety employees Councilmember Godfrey asked if the and said employees with fewer than same person hired during the 20 years of service would be construction phase would take over offered two early retirement the supervisor position. Steve windows: one at 20 years and one Fawcett, finance department, said at 25 years. He said it would be the person hired would. a two-month window starting on July 1 and not on the hiring date. Mr. Godfrey asked if the qualifi- Mr. King then reviewed the pro- cations for construction phase of posed ordinance by section. He the project were right for a said employees who had more than maintenance supervisor once it was 20 years service at the time the in operation. Mr. Stoler said bill was enacted would be able to they were compatible because the retire under the current executive maintenance supervisor needed to order. be involved from the very begin- ning. Councilmember Stoler asked if the ordinance stated that the early Mr. King said there was $227, 000 retirement plan was not a collec- in the contingency fund and the tively-bargained agreement. Roger Treasurer' s Office wanted to Cutler said paragraph two stated transfer $200, 000 into their fund that the provisions of the ordi- to pay for costs of increasing nance were not employee benefits enforcement on delinquent of- and the Council had the right to fenses. Buzz Hunt, City Treasur- amend the ordinance in the future. er, said that due to a court decision lifting a 45-day limit on Mr. King then reviewed the budget filing court action against delin- opening. He said the Treasurer' s quent offenses, it was profitable Office requested one full time to increase the number of court equivalent (FTE) in the form of filings against these offenders. two part time employees in order He said that while costs increased to increase license enforcement. for the program the return also He said the Council should monitor increased in the form of success- these positions so they wouldn't ful court judgments. roll into next year's budget as a permanent FTE. Mr. Cutler said the costs for filing were recovered in the Mr. King said the Parks Department judgment. He said the cost of the had requested one additional program was high this year to make permanent FTE for an irrigation up for an error in last year's supervisor for the new construc- budget which resulted in a defi- tion at the Mountain Dell and cit. Airport golf courses. He said the supervisor would work with the Councilmember Hardman asked if the construction team to put in the contingency fund would be left irrigation system and the equip- with only $27, 000 and Coun- ment for the cross country ski cilmember Kirk asked how they course at Mountain Dell. planned to rebuild the fund. Mr. 89-47 PROCEIINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIS, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 Fawcett said the Finance Depart- ment was confident they could rebuild the fund through internal savings from fleet costs. Mr. King said the goal was to increase contingency funds to $500,000. Councilmember Bittner asked where the $20,000,000 requested by the Airport was coming from, where it was going, and if it represented a surplus. John Wheat, Deputy Director of Airports, said the money was not surplus since it came out of the operations budget and by using the money now, the Airport was able to begin next year' s work. He said that by bidding the projects in the off- season they got better prices and could take advantage of the entire construction season by having contracts in place before spring. Councilmember Bittner said she wanted more time to discuss the proposed changes in the Class A liquor license and Councilmember Stoler suggested they discuss it during the regular meeting. The meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. 89-48 PROCAPINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIl, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in regular session on Tuesday, February 21, 1989, at 6:00 p.m. in Suite 300, City Hall, 324 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Florence Bittner Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Willie Stoler Sydney Fonnesbeck Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler,City Attorney, Kathryn Marshall, City Recorder, and LaNita Brown, Deputy Recorder, were present. Councilmember Stoler presided at the meeting and Councilmember Bittner conducted the meeting. OPENING CEREMONIES CONSENT AGENDA #1. The invocation was given Councilmember Kirk moved and by Barbara Bush, South Valley Councilmember Godfrey seconded to Unitarian Universalist Church. approve the consent agenda, which motion carried, all members voted #2. The Council led the aye except Councilmembers Fonnes- Pledge of Allegiance. beck and Hardman who were absent for the vote. #3. Councilmember Godfrey moved and Councilmember Kirk #1. RE: Resolution 28 of seconded to approve the minutes of 1989 authorizing the execution of the Salt Lake City Council for the an interlocal agreement with Salt regular meeting held Tuesday, Lake County for a flood control February 14, 1989, which motion permit for the installation of a carried, all members voted aye new pump house at the city' s 6200 except Councilmembers Fonnesbeck South pump station. and Hardman who were absent for (C 89-75) the vote. (M 89-1) #2. RE: Resolution 29 of 1989 authorizing the execution of an interlocal agreement with the COMMENTS United States Army Corps of Engi- neers for a permit to discharge There were no citizen comments. earth fill on five acres of wet- land for construction of new sludge drying beds; and to grade, excavate and redistribute fill to construct a wetlands ecosystem to demonstrate the use of treated wastewater for enhancement of wetlands. (C 89-76) 89-49 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI , UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS ACTION: Councilmember Bittner referred this item to the #1. RE: An ordinance super- consent agenda without objection. seding Executive Order 3. 11 .300 (I 89-8) and establishing an early retire- ment incentive program. #6. RE: The appointment of Bonnie Sucec to the Salt Lake Art ACTION: Councilmember God- Design Board. frey moved and Councilmember Horrocks seconded to suspend the ACTION: Councilmember rules and on first reading adopt Bittner referred this item to the Ordinance 6 of 1989 regarding the Committee of the Whole without Early Retirement Incentive Program objection. for eligible employees of Salt (I 89-9) Lake City Corporation, which motion carried, all members voted UNFINISHED BUSINESS aye except Councilmember Fonnes- beck who was absent for the vote. #1. RE: An ordinance amend- (0 89-6) ing Section 6.04.040, 6.08.040 and 6.08. 110 pertaining to Class A #2. RE: The appointment of retail licenses in hotels. Dan Bethel to the Salt Lake City Planning and Zoning Commission. ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey moved and Councilmember ACTION: Councilmember Horrocks seconded to table the Bittner referred this item to the ordinance until March 7, 1989, to Committee of the Whole without enable the Council to evaluate the objection. fiscal impact of legislation (I 89-5) rescinding the innkeeper' s tax, which motion carried, all members #3. RE: The appointment of voted aye. Karen Wikstrom to the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board. DISCUSSION: Councilmember Godfrey said the Council received ACTION: Councilmember a letter from the police depart- Bittner referred this item to the ment which indicated that they had Committee of the Whole without some objections to the ordinance objection. because it would create added (I 89-6) responsibilities to the police department, especially in the area #4. RE: The reppointment of of vice. He said one paragraph in Myron Richardson to the Salt Lake the letter stated that this change Arts Council. would dramatically increase the calls and needs for police servic- ACTION: Councilmember es. Mr. Godfrey said he was Bittner referred this item to the concerned about this information consent agenda without objection. plus the potential impact of (I 89-7) legislation rescinding the hotel tax that Salt Lake City levied. #5. RE: The reappointment of Frank C. Jackson to the Mosquito He said at this time the Abatement District Board. Council needed to consider the financial impact if the city lost $700,000 of hotel tax and said it 89-50 PROC DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI , UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 was interesting that the Utah try and tie it up in committee or Hotel/Motel Association was lobby- fight it. He said he had not yet ing to rescind the hotel tax while received a report as to the suc- asking Salt Lake to approve this cess of the negotiations. ordinance. He said tourists had an impact on the city and if Salt Mayor DePaulis said he had a Lake lost $700, 000 then the Coun- call from several of the legi- cil needed to consider the resi- slators and this action was not dents of Salt Lake since they out of Rules. In response to a would be negatively impacted. compromise he said he replied that the city had not been offered He said if the Council ap- anything yet that would entice proved this ordinance without Salt Lake to support the pro- looking at the financial impact ponents position. He said Salt then ultimately the residents of Lake offered a compromise but had Salt Lake would be hurt. He asked not received their support. He the Council to table the ordinance said he was holding firm that until after the Legislature was there was no compromise and the through so the Council could see city' s position was to fight this what the financial impact would action and keep it in Rules if be. possible. He said there was no sense of cooperation on their part Councilmember Horrocks ex- and he couldn' t recommend their pressed the same concerns about compromise. He said the city was the budget impact and said on one holding firm and his concern was hand the Hotel/Motel Association that the city be involved in the wanted Salt Lake City to help them process rather than just have the make more money but on the other tax taken away. hand were lobbying against the hotel tax which would deprive Salt Councilmember Fonnesbeck also Lake City of needed revenue. said in a related matter that the issues the city requested for more Councilmember Kirk asked flexibility in the Redevelopment Roger Cutler, city attorney, to Agency were taken out and she report what was happening in the thought the Council needed to also Legislature regarding this issue. consider this in regards to the Mr. Cutler said they were negoti- proposed ordinance. ating with the committee and pro- (0 88-35) ponents of the amendment to come up with language which would allow #2. RE: A resolution supple- the city to continue the tax but menting Resolution 24 of 1989 of restrict its use to tourism, Salt Lake City $366,000 Special conventions and fine arts. He Assessment Bonds, Series 1989, said the tax money could be used West Side Interchange Special to pay off some bonds, the city' s Improvement District No. 38-763, commitment to the Salt Palace, and providing for pricing and terms of supporting the fine arts. He the bonds, approving supplementa- indicated that this would not tion of the Official Statement and impact the budget since the city Bond Purchase agreement, and would use hotel tax money for related matters. these purposes instead of the general fund. He said if they ACTION: Councilmember didn' t accept these amendments Horrocks moved and Councilmember then the city' s intention was to Kirk seconded to adopt Resolution 89-51 PROCINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIO, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 26 of 1989, supplementing Resolu- hearing, which motion carried, all tion 24 of 1989 of Salt Lake City members voted aye. $366,000 Special Assessment Bonds, Series 1989, West Side Interchange Councilmember Kirk moved and Special Improvement District No. Councilmember Godfrey seconded to 38-763, providing for pricing and adopt the proposed amendments to terms of the bonds, approving the Fiscal Year 1988-89 Budgets. supplementation of the Official (no vote was taken) Statement and Bond Purchase agree- ment, and related matters, which Councilmember Stoler moved motion carried, all members voted and Councilmember Hardman second- aye. ed a substitute motion to adopt (Q 84-6) Ordinance 7 of 1989 amending the Fiscal Year 1988/89 Budgets with #3. RE: A resolution supple- the exception of moving $200, 000 menting Resolution 25 of 1989 of from contingency, which motion Salt Lake City $148,000 Special carried, all members voted aye Assessment Bonds, Series 1989, except Councilmembers Fonnesbeck Special Improvement District No. and Kirk who voted nay. 38-813, Non-Contiguous Streets, providing for pricing and terms of DISCUSSION: Steve Fawcett, the bonds, approving supplementa- finance department, briefly out- tion of the Official Statement and lined the proposed amendments. He Bond Purchase agreement, and said the first item was a request related matters, from the fleet maintenance inter- nal service fund to appropriate a ACTION: Councilmember Kirk portion of fund balance and moved and Councilmember Godfrey additional revenue received from seconded to adopt Resolution 27 the sale of surplus vehicles to of 1989, supplementing Resolution purchase three dump trucks that 25 of 1989 of Salt Lake City were requested in a prior fiscal $148, 000 Special Assessment Bonds, year ( the funds lapsed and fleet Series 1989, Special Improvement was unable to make the purchase) . District No. 38-813, Non-Contigu- He said they had made the purchase ous Streets, providing for pricing order in the current year but they and terms of the bonds, approving needed the appropriation to cover supplementation of the Official the budget. Statement and Bond Purchase Agree- ment, and related matters, which He said the impact to the motion carried, all members voted general fund was an increase in aye. both revenues received and expen- (Q 87-4) ditures of $90,447. The airport enterprise fund requested an PUBLIC HEARINGS increase of $20,044, 100 for capi- tal improvement projects, which #1 RE: A public hearing was something they did yearly. scheduled for 6:20 p.m. to obtain He said the golf fund requested an comment concerning proposed amend- increase in FTEs ( full time em- ments to the Fiscal Year 1988/89 ployees ) for a golf maintenance Budgets. supervisor during construction at the new golf courses. He said ACTION: Councilmember this position would remain after Godfrey moved and Councilmember construction as the golf mainte- Kirk seconded to close the public nance supervisor for the new golf 89-52 PROCEPINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI" UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 course at the airport. He said didn't realize the city was fund- they also requested an increase in ing anything for R/UDAT and he their capital outlay budget of asked who received the money and $33, 000 to purchase needed golf how it was spent. Mr. Fawcett carts before the season and fund- said the CBID was a special fund ing would come from present funds created by a special license fee available from the sale of surplus for down town businesses and they property. had a board of directors that approved their expenditures and He said the health insurance budgets. He said the city fol- trust fund requested a $1,018,000 lowed this fund as a matter of appropriation to correct an over- accounting and because the funds sight during the budget process on were handled by the licensing their revenue and expenditure side department. for increased premiums applied to the retirees. He said they were In reference to the R/UDAT receiving the revenue but the expenditure, Craig Peterson, appropriation did not get budgeted director of Development Services, originally. He said there was an said the CBID was the primary accounting transfer between the sponsor of the R/UDAT and the capital improvement fund and the purpose of the money was to con- miscellaneous grant funds relating tinue funding for the staff to to the Canterbury Apartments, insure that R/UDAT was implement- which was strictly an accounting ed. He said some funds would be situation moving the appropriation for staff and some would be for to the capital improvements fund promotional-type activities. since that was more appropriate. Councilmember Godfrey asked He said there was a decrease if the city had the McKinney Act in miscellaneous grant funds of funds. Rosemary Davis, Capital $653, 932, which was made up of Planning and Programming, said increases in the RDA program they had been notified that all income and there was an accounting the city had to do was submit the transfer reappropriating fund application. balance that lapsed at the end of the fiscal year for miscellaneous Councilmember Stoler asked grants. He said they were re- for more clarification about the quired to reappropriate the funds funding for R/UDAT and asked if so they could spend them. He said this would be perpetual funding. they had a new shelter grant that Councilmember Fonnesbeck said the needed to be appropriated and a funds used for this were CBID minor program income from the funds not city funds and said this Capitol Hill revolving fund. was the committee' s own money and they were asking to spend it. He said the Central Business Councilmember Stoler asked where Improvement District requested an CBID got the funds. Mr. Fawcett amendment of $40,000 in order for said the CBID members paid an them to continue their R/UDAT additional business license fee contribution as well as create a that went into the fund. He said Christmas ad for next season and finance didn't scrutinize the use he said there were funds in their as long as the CBID didn't exceed fund balance for these items. the funds available. Councilmember Hardman said he Councilmember Kirk said the 89-53 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIl, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 CBID was going do to a television departments which had been identi- ad for Christmas, they also used fied. Mr. Fawcett indicated that money to continue on the R/UDAT was possible although the funds process, they did the down town would transfer across departmental banners, and they did the Christ- lines. He said the savings was mas lighting. Councilmember mostly in fleet maintenance which Hardman asked why the city was crossed several departmental lines involved in the CBID budget. Mr. and he didn't know if they were Fawcett said it was because the prepared at this meeting to take city assessed the license fee and portions of funds out of different collected it. Councilmember budgets. Stoler asked about the amount of the CBID budget and Mr. Fawcett In reference to using contin- said it was approximately $115, 000 gency funds to pay for additional to $120, 000 a year in new funds costs associated with increasing and they spent probably $80, 000 to the enforcement on delinquent $100, 000 each year. He said offenses, Councilmember Horrocks remaining money was used for indicated that the city wasn't special purposes such as R/UDAT. sure they had a rate of return. Councilmember Stoler asked what Mr. Fawcett said they weren't CBID funding paid for in R/UDAT. positive if they were returning Mr. Peterson said they viewed the cost of enforcing on the themselves as the implementation delinquencies but he said they team to promote the R/UDAT recom- were gaining $400, 000 per year in mendations. revenue by enforcing delinquent parking notices. He said they Councilmember Hardman asked weren' t sure if there would be to discuss the contingency fund enough increase to cover the cost, and asked how much money was however, the Council had to originally earmarked for contin- consider the ramifications by not gency. Mr. Fawcett said they enforcing the issue. originally earmarked $250, 000 of which $50,000 was tentatively set Roger Cutler, city attorney, aside for additional water needs pointed out that the cost of at the parks department if neces- enforcement encouraged people to sary. Mr. Hardman said there was pay voluntarily and if people knew a request for $200, 000 from con- the city didn't enforce parking tingency which would leave a fund tickets then at some point the balance of $27, 000 in contingency. uncollectables would increase. He said there was also an equal Councilmember Hardman asked protection argument that the city about savings earmarked from the shouldn' t let people not pay in departments. Mr. Fawcett said fairness to those citizens who did because they were concerned about pay voluntarily. When the city being low in the contingency fund, changed parking from a criminal to they decided to set a level of a civil issue, Mr. Cutler said $500, 000 for contingency as a their commitment was that they margin of safety. He said they would enforce this vigorously. came up with several different scenarios to cover this fund if Councilmember Fonnesbeck necessary. Councilmember Hardman asked why they were using contin- suggested that rather than spend gency rather than savings from $200, 000 from contingency they departments. Mr. Fawcett said take the necessary funds from that the attorney' s office was 89-54 PROCEPINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI , UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 showing a large deficit in that motivation to come up with the line item of the quarterly finan- savings rather than use contingen- cial report and they were going to cy and he concurred with this transfer those expenditures to the concept. Lee King, Council Staff, treasurer' s office because it made said whether the money was taken more sense. But transferring the from contingency or moved from expenditure without an appropria- fleet now, they still had the tion would cause the treasurer' s problem of a deficit in the trea- office to show a deficit. He said surer' s office. He said it would by the end of the fiscal year they be easier to take the money from would have to make an adjustment contingency now, since that is to cover the deficit. what it was for, and then give Council Staff the instructions to Councilmember Hardman sug- capture the departmental savings. gested to amend the budget and take the money from departments Mr. Cutler said he thought rather than contingency. Mr. administration needed to know that Fawcett said the savings was in the Council was aware of the all the departments and it would deficit and would take whatever be a matter of having to identify action necessary to make the the savings by department and then budget whole, including using the reduce each department' s budget to contingency fund if necessary. Or produce the $200,000. if the money was not found in the Councilmember Godfrey suggested it departmental savings, would the might be better to wait until the Council want this service discon- next budget opening and then tinued. He said he didn' t see how transfer the money. the finance department could continue to incur expenses without Mr. Fawcett said that fleet a commitment from the Council that anticipated a savings in their their budget would be made whole budget but they didn't have it "in and if that understanding was not the bank" . Councilmember Hardman there, then he thought the depart- was concerned about the money ment needed to consider ceasing being transferred from contingency further service until the funds and then not being replaced with were appropriated. savings from departments. Mr. Fawcett said the next major budget Councilmember Hardman said he opening would be in June and by strongly supported the enforcement then fleet would have captured the program but said he thought when funds. administration had identified approximately $500, 000 in depart- Councilmember Godfrey asked mental savings then the Council how the Council could give finance should use that money first before direction to make sure savings using contingency. Councilmember would go to contingency. Mr. Fonnesbeck said she was concerned Fawcett said the contingency that they would need to use the appropriation lapsed at the end of contingency for an emergency and the fiscal year; it was not the then the city would have a same as fund balance and if it $200,000 deficit. She was also wasn' t used it lapsed. concerned that a department was spending money they didn' t have. Councilmember Stoler suggest- ed that Mr. Hardman was perhaps No one from the audience trying to give departments the spoke on this issue. (B 88-5) 89-55 PROCEIINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CII, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 The meeting ad ' urne at 7: 15 p.m. CO/Pit HAIR ON L-r)tadia CI Y RE DER 89-56 dCatnda�->^ _ •'D Chanq� I curft(Mc-, o��mw ' ger) n h'llnol /) . n0 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA fD COMM t r t4 �elCt )55,, (Dr rn one , Since J., (5 AL) i;-�nc,CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER pOSt ( L� In CkCIU(koCe_ SUITE 300, CITY HALL C�I re L e a a�V' fi i -�('L) .324 SOUTH STATE STREET G.� �J�](� bf( (oa( Ctr ' ""`-'Tuesday, February 21, 1989V ` 'neq IS Pmf)031 i 24Z1 Spim 6:00 p.m. 1 1 \tlt1 6 meefi 15 Wiih -t-4 Pc-firk (l 9 A. BRIEFING SESSION: 5:00 - 5:55 p.m. , Suite 300 City Hall,` 324 South State. 1. Report of the Executive Director. Coon C I l �L� lU�ctl.a(-• B. OPENING CEREMONIES: 1. Invocation. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Approval of the Minutes. C. COMMENTS: 1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2. Citizen Comments to the Council. ! ' D. CONSENT: - tokk kL � p)b(k_ V�"IIit IL-DA t 1 IsNAs2 (1 qc.) n COo&ot--08 1. Interlocal Cooperation Agreement - Salt Lake County, Flood Control. Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County for a flood control permit for the installation of a new pump house at the City's 6200 South pump station. -r C tJ Lj (feeds To V\kp1oe (C 89-75) \1�" (-p fJ ) �JJUi �1 ' ufy p fie(-zre- STAFF RECOMMENDATION: tApptew-is 1 rri�U-1v1 season , 'f coreimen+ iS iyrt oakd Er a conch L1on use per 1t t 1"ke (e(CAI, . 2. Interlocal Cooperation Agreement - U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers for a permit to discharge earth fill on five acres of wetland for and construction of new sludge drying beds and to grade, excavate and redistribute fill to construct a wetlands ecosystem to demonstrate the use of treated wastewater for enhancement of wetlands. (C 89-76) iTh6 T`Qlino 'tb lOef ands pink (n More STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt.c onStN'+ •e 71-Di e .uS p(anreJ Gnat acid AA a cl ci t Lt014.6t,I E. NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS: 0(110� bid • 1. Early Retirement. �l l)1 Consider adopting an ordinance superceding Executive Order 3. 11. 300 and establishing an Early Retirement incentive program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Suspend Rules, Adopt on First Reading. E. NEW COUNCIL '1USINESS Cont'd. 2. Planning ana Zonis Commission -_A��ointment. Consider approving the appointment of Dan Bethel to the Salt Lake City Planning and Zoning Commission. ( I 89-5) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Refer to Committee of the Whole. a Housing Advisory and Appeals Board - Appointment. 1 Consider approving the appointment of Karen Wikstrom to the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board. {\ U\ ,'qV'\� (I 89-6) i () y STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Refer to Committee of the Whole. .." �} �\ 4. Salt Lake Arts Council - Reappointment. \\ v ��\ pr��1 Consider approving the reappointment of Myron Richardson to the Salt Lake _, o\`� Arts Council. \�\� $ 1 ( I 89-7) % 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Refer to Consent. A ^y� 5. Mosquito Abatement District - Reappointment. skt �ryv Consider approving the reappointment of Frank C. Jackson to the Mosquito pp Abatement District Board. ( I 89-8) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Refer to Consent. 6. Salt Lake Art Design Board - Appointment. Consider approving the appointment of Bonnie Sucec to the Salt Lake Art Design Board. ( I 89-9) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Refer to Committee of the Whole. F. UNFINISHED COUNCIL BUSINESS: CONLM ' 1. Class A Retail Licenses in Hotels. Consider adopting an ordinance amending Section 6.04.040, 6.08.040, and 6. 08. 110 pertaining to Class A retail licenses in hotels. `� �) (0 88-39) \v)\ ) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. �2��� Special Improvement District No. 38-763 - California Avenue Interchange. c�'��, `a51 Consider adopting a resolution supplementing Resolution No. 24 of 1989 of , nul`�- lt ' Salt Lake City $366,000 Special Assessment Bonds, Series 1989, West Side `n^� S� Interchange Special Improvement District No. 38-763, providing for pricing k� and terms of the bonds, approving supplementation of the Official Statement 1,\n \c `i , and the Bond Purchase Agreement, and related matters. (Q 84-6) • 6,r01) \f\oS A%AFF RE NDATION: Adopt. F. UNFINISHED 'UNCIL BUSINESS Cont'd. 3. Special Improvement District No. 38-813 - Non-Contiguous Streets. Consider adopting a resolution supplementing Resolution No. 25 of 1989 of Salt Lake City $148,000 Special Assessment Bonds, Series 1989, Special Improvement District No. 38-813, providing for pricing and terms of the bonds, approving supplementation of the Official Statement and the Bond Purchase Agreement, and related matters. (Q 87-4) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. G �� c il10 In -(ktij G. PUBLIC HEARINGS: k.i� �, co �ury� I 1. Fiscal Year 1988/89 - Budget Amendment. �'�� 6: 20 p.m. 1,0f1 Obtain public comment concerning and consider adopting proposed amendments "' to the Fiscal Year 1988/89 Budgets. PAVIi /,Xp u � (B 88-5) ���� STAFF RECOMMEENDATION: Close Hearing and Adopt. N H. ho r�br ADJOURNMENT. ** FINAL. ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AND/OR ORDINANCES ADOPTED CONCERNING ANY ITEM ON THIS AGENDA DATED: ^____ _ February 17, 1989 __ _ n BY: CH EF EPUTY CIT RECORDER STATE OF UTAH ) COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ss. On the 17th day of February, 1989, I personally delivered a copy of the foregoing notice to the Mayor and City Council and posted copies of the same in conspicuous view, at the following times and locations within City Hall, 324 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. At 5:00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office, 5th Floor; and 2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom, Room 336. it CHI F I/ PUTY CITY RECORDER Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of February, 1989. /111( •tary P •lic resi.i�`• 'he State of Utah My Commission Expires: : P----/---ei APPROVAL: • vr� EXE,UTIVE DIRECTOR PROCEEDINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT _AKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in regular session on Tuesday, February 14, 1989, at 6:00 p.m. in Suite 300, City Hall, 324 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Florence Bittner Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Willie Stoler Sydney Fonnesbeck Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Lynda Domino, Chief Deputy City Recorder, and LaNita Brown, Deputy Recorder, were present. Mayor Palmer DePaulis was absent. Councilmember Stoler presided at the meeting and Councilmember Bittner conducted the meeting. OPENING CEREMONIES this might be addressed in the upcoming Housing Conference. Mr. #1. The invocation was given Tuttle said that in some cities by Police Chaplain Ted Fields. landlords were required to pay relocation costs when a building #2. The Council led the was closed down, and there was Pledge of Allegiance. already a federal law requiring this when people were being re- #3. Councilmember Kirk mov- located by a federal project. Mr. ed and Councilmember Godfrey Tuttle said he felt they needed to seconded to approve the minutes of have something done sooner than the Salt Lake City Council for the the Housing Conference. He said regular meeting held Tuesday, they should consider imposing a February 7, 1989, which motion moratorium on evictions. Mr. carried, all members present voted Cutler informed the Council that aye, except Councilmember Fonnes- there had been a number of re- beck who was absent at the time of quests for various proposals on the vote. this kind of situation and there (M 89-1 ) were state statutes that supersed- ed and limited any authority the city would have to deal with the COMMENTS problem. He said the matter might be better addressed through Rich Tuttle, speaking for the the state legislature. Coun- Salt Lake Hospitality Ministry, a cilmember Bittner said she felt program for homeless persons, they should refer the issue to asked the Council if they would their staff who could then meet meet with his group to address the with Mr. Tuttle and together they problem of slum landlords. He could decide what the options were said people were being forced into before making any decisions. the streets because Salt Lake City did not have ordinances to require landlords to maintain their prop- erty in a decent manner. Coun- cilmember Godfrey said he felt coclecf�,� 89-41 PROCEEDINGS .F THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT AJAKE CITY, UTAH 1Y- �/ (UVIA` TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 C The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of the Whole on Tuesday, February 14, 1989, at 5:00 p.m. in Suite 300, City Hall, 324 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Florence Bittner Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Willie Stoler Sydney Fonnesbeck Council Chairperson Stoler presided at the meeting. The Council interviewed Mark golf ordinance were mainly techni- Cantor prior to consideration of cal changes. She said the neces- his appointment to the Salt Lake sary motions were outlined and City Arts Council. Mr. Cantor should be made separately as there said he had lived in Salt Lake might not be consensus on each City for 10 years and had been motion. active in the Folk Music Division of the Arts Council as a performer Councilmember Bittner asked and historian. He said he was when the new fees would go into looking forward to helping shape effect and Ms. Hamilton said the the direction of the arts communi- change for passes would go into ty and was willing to put in a lot effect immediately, but the dis- of volunteer time to do so. count green fees of $3. 50 for juniors and seniors would go into The Council interviewed effect January 1, 1989 and then Marjorie Janove prior to consider- change to $4. 50 on July 1, 1990. ation of her appointment to the To avoid changing fees in the Salt Lake City Arts Council. Ms. middle of the golf season staff Janove said she had been active in recommended changing the fees to the arts all her life. She said $4. 50 on January 1, 1990. that during the six years she had lived in the city she had been a Councilmember Hardman said he soloist performer with the Utah would be making a motion to change Symphony and also a teacher. She the golf ordinance so that no free said she was active in the Brown golf passes would be allowed. Bag Series, had noticed increased Sheryl Gillilan, Mayor's Office attendance and she wanted to Policy Analyst, explained that enhance the trend through promo- this would affect the Golf Adviso- tions and public awareness cam- ry Board (GAB) as they were the paigns. only Board who received free passes. Mr. Hardman said he had Lee King, Council Staff Audi- two reasons for initiating the tor, reviewed the schedule for change. They were: 1 ) the city Olympic Committee meetings and did not compensate members of said that an agenda for the Thurs- other volunteer boards, and 2) day, February 16, 1989 meeting had giving members of the GAB free been posted. He handed out min- passes insulated them from recom- utes of the subcommittee meetings. mendations the Board made relat- ing to fee structure and he felt Ms. Hamilton reviewed the it would cloud their judgement. agenda saying that changes to the 89-39 PROCEEDINGS JF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT .,AKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 Rick Graham, Parks Department, out the portability of the Tax said that because no other passes Increment money and the area were given out, the monetary blight concept, but the city impact was very small and the city lobbyist was working hard against expected the members of the GAB to them both and thought there was a become experts on the city courses good chance to defeat both amend- in order to make recommendations ments. as to how they should be operated. Councilmember Kirk asked if there Councilmember Bittner said the was a way to limit the number of Salt Palace Expansion Feasibility rounds they could play. She said Committee had met for the last a number of people had the impres- time as a body with the strong sion that a lot of free passes recommendation that the renovation were given out and the change and remodeling of existing conven- could help to dispel that. Coun- tion facilities at the Salt Palace cilmember Bittner said the Board not be tied to the construction of members needed their passes in the new arena. She said the order to do their job well. committee recommended that the Salt Palace improvements continue Ms. Hamilton asked Coun- on an incremental basis. cilmember Bittner for an update on activity in the state legislature Councilmember Bittner said the and Ms. Bittner said that the city was working hard to defeat situation was very fluid. Michael the bill to repeal the Innkeeper Chitwood, Director of the Redevel- Tax as the new arena couldn' t be opment Agency ( RDA) , explained funded if it was repealed. She the status of the state funding said the ones fighting hardest to bill for the new arena and said repeal the tax were the ones to the possibilities for getting it benefit from the new arena facil- passed were good. He said the ity. Roger Cutler, City Attorney, bond repayment would be financed said the lobbyist felt the bill by the Tax Increment and the RDA could be defeated in the Senate. would get 100% for the first 14 years, then 20% would begin to Councilmember Godfrey ques- rollback and the RDA would get 80% tioned what effect losing the for the next 12 years. Mr. portability would have, and Mr. Chitwood said two concepts were Chitwood said it would kill at- very important to the bill: 1 ) the tempts to build parking structures area blight , and 2 ) the portabil- and support buildings outside of ity of the Tax Increment. He said the redevelopment area. Coun- the portability of the Tax Incre- cilmember Bittner asked the Coun- ment monies would allow the RDA to cil if they felt the need to call buy land and develop parking a meeting as the RDA Board of structures outside the redevelop- Directors in order to take a vote ment project area. He said that and make an official stand, but through interlocal agreements the none of the Councilmembers felt a state would hold harmless the meeting was necessary. school district and the RDA would hold harmless the library system. He passed our a chart showing the funding breakdown. ( attached) Mr. Chitwood said two amend- ments had been introduced to strip 89-40 ARENA FUNDING EXAMPLE HB 390 ARENA SCHOOL NET DEBT YEAR REVENUE TI CONTRACT SERVICE 1989 1 ,839 390 1 ,449 1990 1 ,839 390 1 ,449 1991 1 ,839 390 1 ,449 1992 1 ,839 526 390 1 , 975 1993 2 , 299 526 390 2 ,435 1994 2 , 299 526 390 2 ,435 1995 2 , 299 526 390 2 ,435 1996 2 , 299 526 390 2 , 435 1997 2 , 299 526 390 2 ,435 1998 2 , 759 526 390 2 ,895 0 1999 2 , 759 526 390 2 ,895 2000 2 , 759 526 390 2 ,895 w 2001 2 , 759 526 390 2 ,895 2002 2 , 759 526 390 2 ,895 2003 1 , 380 526 390 1 , 516 • 2004 1 , 380 526 390 1 , 516 2005 1 ,380 526 390 1 ,516 2006 1 , 380 526 390 1 , 516 2007 1 , 380 526 390 1 , 516 2008 1 ,839 526 390 1 ,975 2009 1 ,839 526 390 1 ,975 ASSUMPTIONS : 1 ) FINANCING CALCULATED AT 8 . 5% WITH NO COSTS OF ISSUANCE & NO FUNDED RESERVES . 2 ) PROJECTION IS BASED ON UNAUDITED ESTIMATES OF FUTURE CBD TAX INCREMENT . 3 ) WHEN THE DEBT IS RETIRED THE TAX INCREMENT WILL BE DISTRIBUTED AS CURRENTLY OUTLINED IN THE UTAH NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ACT . 4 ) THE PERIOD FOR WHICH THE ROLL BACK IS WAIVED IS TOTALLY DEPENDENT ON THE TIME NECESSARY TO RETIRE THE DEBT CREATED TO ASSIST THE ARENA . PROCEEDINGS JP' THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAL1 J.AKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in regular session on Tuesday, February 14, 1989, at 6:00 p.m. in Suite 300, City Hall, 324 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Florence Bittner Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Willie Stoler Sydney Fonnesbeck Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Lynda Domino, Chief Deputy City Recorder, and LaNita Brown, Deputy Recorder, were present. Mayor Palmer DePaulis was absent. Councilmember Stoler presided at the meeting and Councilmember Bittner conducted the meeting. OPENING CEREMONIES this might be addressed in the upcoming Housing Conference. Mr. #1. The invocation was given Tuttle said that in some cities by Police Chaplain Ted Fields. landlords were required to pay relocation costs when a building #2. The Council led the was closed down, and there was Pledge of Allegiance. already a federal law requiring this when people were being re- #3. Councilmember Kirk mov- located by a federal project. Mr. ed and Councilmember Godfrey Tuttle said he felt they needed to seconded to approve the minutes of have something done sooner than the Salt Lake City Council for the the Housing Conference. He said regular meeting held Tuesday, they should consider imposing a February 7, 1989, which motion moratorium on evictions. Mr. carried, all members present voted Cutler informed the Council that aye, except Councilmember Fonnes- there had been a number of re- beck who was absent at the time of quests for various proposals on the vote. this kind of situation and there (M 89-1) were state statutes that supersed- ed and limited any authority the city would have to deal with the COMMENTS problem. He said the matter might be better addressed through Rich Tuttle, speaking for the the state legislature. Coun- Salt Lake Hospitality Ministry, a cilmember Bittner said she felt program for homeless persons, they should refer the issue to asked the Council if they would their staff who could then meet meet with his group to address the with Mr. Tuttle and together they problem of slum landlords. He could decide what the options were said people were being forced into before making any decisions. the streets because Salt Lake City did not have ordinances to require landlords to maintain their prop- , /M 0 1i 89-41 PROCEEDINGS .F THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAL'. .AKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 CONSENT AGENDA seconded to adopt Resolution 24 of 1989, authorizing the issuance and Councilmember Godfrey moved providing for the sale of $366, 000 and Councilmember Hardman seconded Special Assessment Bonds, Series to approve the consent agenda, 1989, Westside Interchange Special which motion carried, all members Improvement District No. 38-763, voted aye. fixing the range of interest rates, prescribing the form, the #1. RE: The appointment of maturity and denomination of the Mark Cantor and Marjorie Janove to bonds; providing for the contin- the Salt Lake City Arts Council. uance of a guaranty fund; autho- (I 88-23) rizing and approving the form of a bond purchase agreement, and related matters, which motion NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS carried, all members voted aye. (Q 84-6) #1. RE: The appointment of Cindy Gust-Jenson as Executive #2. RE: A resolution autho- Director of the Salt Lake City rizing the issuance and providing Council, effective February 19, for the sale of $148, 000 Special 1989 . Assessment Bonds, Series 1989, Special Improvement District No. ACTION: Councilmember God- 38-813, Non-Contiguous Streets, frey moved and Councilmember fixing the range of interest Hardman seconded the motion to rates, prescribing the form, the suspend the rules and adopt on maturity and denomination of the first reading, the appointment of bonds; providing for the continu- Cindy Gust-Jenson as Executive ance of a guaranty fund; authoriz- Director of the Salt Lake City ing and approving the form of a Council, effective February 19, bond purchase agreement, and 1989, which motion carried, all related matters. members voted aye. 1 (I 89-4) ACTION: Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Godfrey seconded to adopt Resolution 25 UNFINISHED BUSINESS of 1989, authorizing the issuance and providing for the sale of #1. RE: A resolution autho- $148, 000 Special Assessment rizing the issuance and providing Bonds, Series 1989, Special Im- for the sale of $366,000 Special provement District No. 38-813, Assessment Bonds, Series 1989, Non-Contiguous Streets, fixing the Westside Interchange Special range of interest rates, prescrib- Improvement District No. 38-763, ing the form, the maturity and fixing the range of interest denomination of the bonds; provid- rates, prescribing the form, the ing for the continuance of a maturity and denomination of the guaranty fund; authorizing and bonds; providing for the contin- approving the form of a bond uance of a guaranty fund; autho- purchase agreement, and related rizing and approving the form of a matters, which motion carried, all bond purchase agreement, and members voted aye. related matters. (0 87-4) ACTION: Councilmember Kirk #3. RE: An ordinance estab- moved and Councilmember Godfrey lishing fees at the city' s golf 89-42 PROCEEDINGS siF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAL1 LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 courses and establishing rules and Councilmember Kirk moved and conditions under which those fees Councilmember Stoler seconded to will apply. approve the proposal as adopted on January 17, 1989, but changing ACTION: Councilmember Kirk Section E to read, "Golf passes moved and Councilmember Stoler and discounts provided herein may seconded to approve the proposal not be used for weekend or holiday as adopted on January 17, 1989, play" , which motion carried, all but changing Section A 2a to members voted aye. reflect that green fees for Jun- iors and Seniors from January 1, Councilmember Hardman moved 1989, to December 31, 1989, will and Councilmember Kirk seconded to be $3. 50 and on January 1, 1990, approve the proposal as adopted on this fee will change to $4. 50, January 17, 1989, but adding which motion carried, all members Section G which states, "No season voted aye. golf pass shall be issued without payment to the city of the appro- Councilmember Kirk moved and priate rate listed in Subparagraph Councilmember Stoler seconded to 3, ' Season Golf Passes '" , which approve the proposal as adopted on motion carried, all members voted January 17, 1989, but changing aye except Councilmembers Bittner, Section A 3b to read, "Senior/- Horrocks, and Stoler who voted Junior Citizen pass rate will be nay. four hundred dollars" , which motion carried, all members voted Councilmember Kirk moved and aye except Councilmembers Councilmember Hardman seconded to Fonnesbeck and Godfrey who voted adopt Ordinance 5 of 1989, as nay. amended, which motion carried, all members voted aye except Coun- Councilmember Kirk moved and cilmembers Fonnesbeck and Godfrey Councilmember Stoler seconded to who voted nay. approve the proposal as adopted on January 17, 1989, but changing DISCUSSION: Councilmember Section A 5c to read, "Effective Hardman said he was proposing to July 1, 1990, no private carts at eliminate all free golf passes in Mt. Dell Canyon & Lake" , which the city from this point forward. motion carried, all members voted He said it had been evident during aye. the hearing that the public be- lieved that city personnel and the Councilmember Kirk moved and City Council had access to free Councilmember Stoler seconded to golf passes. He said the only approve the proposal as adopted on persons he knew who had these January 17, 1989, but changing passes were city retirees and Section B to read, "Only persons members of the Golf Advisory Board whose principal place of residence (GAB) . He said he felt the issue is within the state of Utah and was one of fairness and he felt it who, at the time of pass purchase, was in the best interest of every- have a present expectation to one to eliminate them. continue residency within the state throughout the term of the Councilmember Fonnesbeck pass, shall be eligible to pur- questioned how many lifetime chase or use a season golf pass" , passes had been issued, and Rick which motion carried, all members Graham, Parks Department, said he voted aye. did not know but at one time they 89-43 PROCEEDINGS of THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT .SAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 were given to retiring city em- E. Senior/Junior discount play ployees after 30 years of ser- would raise to $5. 50 and regular vice. Councilmember Horrocks said green fees to $7 in 1993/94. the GAB had out-of-pocket expenses (Councilmember Godfrey said that were not reimbursed and if that the first scenario would be none of the other board or commit- passing the buck to a future tee members did, this might be a Council. ) point they should consider. Coun- The second scenario was based cilmember Stoler asked Mr. Graham on the assumption that se- if the golf passes were given to nior/junior passes be maintained the GAB for leisure use or for at the current cost. It showed business use, and Mr. Graham said the following: they were given for business use A. Green fees would stay at since the most effective way for current levels until 1990/91. the GAB to become aware of changes B. Senior/Junior discount play or problems was by playing each would raise to $4. 50 and regular course, but he said they did not green fees to $6 in 1990/91 . monitor the use of the passes. C. Senior/Junior discount fees would raise to $5 . 50 and regular Mr. Cutler said the adminis- green fees to $7 in 1991/92. tration would still have the D. Senior/Junior discount fees prerogative to reimburse the GAB' s would raise to $6 and regular fees golf expenses if they were going to $8 in 1992/93. out to inspect a course. E. From that point on, green fees would remain flat and provide Councilmember Godfrey read a adequate revenue to meet bond memo he had prepared for the payments. Council Members in regards to the Golf Fee Structure. He said he Councilmember Godfrey said had asked the staff to assess the the obvious problem was the affect future impact of the fee structure on regular green fees. He said if and to analyze what green fees passes were maintained the current should be in future years to fee structure would have to esca- ensure that bond payments could be late dramatically and eventually made and the golf fund would golfers either couldn't afford to remain in the black without gener- golf or would decide it wasn' t al fund appropriations. He said worth the money, which would mean there were two scenarios and the decreased revenue. He felt they first one was based on the assump- should immediately eliminate the tion that passes would be elimi- golf passes. nated when the golf fund began (0 89-3) showing a deficit. It showed the following: A. Passes would be eliminated PUBLIC HEARINGS between January and June of 1990. B. Non-pass senior/junior dis- #1 RE: A public hearing count play would raise to $4.50 in scheduled for 6:20 p.m. to obtain 1990/91 . Regular green fees would comment concerning, and consider remain at $6. adopting a proposed amendment to C. All fees would remain the Section 21 . 78 . 110 of the Zoning same in 1991/92. Ordinance to allow conditional D. Senior/Junior discount play charitable uses in closed churches would raise to $5 and regular and schools. green fees to $7 in 1992/93. 89-44 PROCEEDINGS .F THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT .SAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 ACTION: Councilmember Stoler temporary meant, and Ms. Jardine moved and Councilmember Godfrey said there was a five-year time seconded to close the public limit, after which it would have hearing, which motion carried, all to be renewed or the use would members voted aye. cease. Councilmember Godfrey moved No one from the audience ad- and Councilmember Hardman second- dressed the issue. ed to adopt Ordinance 4 of 1989, (0 89-4) amending Section 21.78. 110 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow condi- The meeting adjourned at 7:00 tional charitable uses in closed p.m. churches and schools, which motion carried, all members voted aye. DISCUSSION: Janice Jardine, Planning and Zoning, said the current zoning ordinance allowed the Board of Adjustment to permit schools that had been temporarily closed or had reduced enrollment, to be used on a temporary basis COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON for office space for limited public, private, charitable, or educational purposes as a condi- tional use. She said they had identified four major planning issues that needed to be consid- ered. They were: 1 ) the compati- CITY RECORDER bili_ty _of___the—youth within the residential neighborhoods in i which if- would be located; 2) an ------ --- ---- increase in the intensity of the use of the building on a daily basis; 3 ) provision for adequate parking for the increase in the use; and 4) the impact of addi- tional traffic traveling through the surrounding area. She said the Planning Division staff be- lieved that a conditional use review process would allow each circumstance to be evaluated against criteria designed to protect the quality of neighbor- hoods, while allowing temporary use of institutional structures that may serve the neighborhood in the future. She said the Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilmember Fonnesbeck questioned what the definition of 89-45 S' I ;!1_4 GITN 0,0._LP0 tee!Film � r, �f► ,11111 DEPARTAIEN 1 MIKE CHABRIES CHIEF OF POLICE 315 EAST 200 SOUTH TELEPHONE 799-3000 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 February 21, 1989 Salt Lake City Council 324 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 RE: Ordinance amending sections 6.04.040, 6.08.040 and 6.08.110 pertaining to Class A Retail Licenses in Hotels Dear Council: The Ordinance as drafted does not limit the number of cans of beer that could be stocked in these refrigerators. With the number of concerts, tour groups and hockey matches - to name a few events - in the downtown area, the potential for minors drinking are obvious. The Ordinance also does not preclude the future introduction of mini bottles, carrying a much higher alcohol content than 3.2 beer. The Salt Lake City Police Department opposes the extending of Class A Liquor licenses to include unattended distribution points in hotel rooms. This objection is based on the added responsibility this Department, specifically the Special Investigation Division, would incur. This Division is currently manned by a sergeant and five detectives. These officers are responsible to monitor prostitution, deviate sexual behavior, gambling, obscenity, liquor and City licensing, as well as background investigations. In reference to the monitoring of our City's liquor ordinances, our Division makes inspections of all Class A, B, C, and E licensed establishments, as well as private clubs, and seasonal beer events. This required personal inspections for minors in and about the licensed businesses and the sale of alcohol to minors. We also make inspections to see if adults are providing alcohol, without the knowledge of the licensed business, or their approval. This Division monitors Class A and B licensed businesses for the sale of alcohol to minors for consumption off the premises. These licensed businesses range from supermarkets, neighborhood grocery stores, to the corner convenience stores and restaurants. Salt Lake City Council Page 2 February 21, 1989 The addition of 381 dispensing points in one building; i.e. , the Doubletree, would be no small task for this small group of detectives. Obviously, we would have to make frequent trips to this address to monitor if desk clerks are checking identifications. We would anticipate, if this ordinance is passed, most if not all of the other hotels and motels also providing their customers the same "conveniences." This would easily expand to over 1,000 new dispensing points which would require monitoring. Obviously, a six officer squad is not capable of monitoring this number of dispensing points and still carry on investigations in the other areas Vice is responsible for. The resulting enforcement would therefore be minimal, at best. It is not our intent to monitor activities in every residence in Salt Lake City, even if they are only one night residences. Our hopes remain that no one will need our services, but the introduction of people drinking dramatically increases the calls and needs for police services. _ With the current personnel in both Vice and Patrol, we may not be able to keep the "quiet, safe and progressive city" image we are trying to keep to attract businesses and conventions. We urge careful consideration with this ordinance amendment in view of the limits this Department is currently working under. Sincerely, i Capt. Mike risbey Special Investigations Division MF/sj DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. OF 1989 (Early Retirement Incentive Program for Eligible Employees of Salt Lake City Corporation) AN ORDINANCE ENACTING SECTION 2 . 52.025 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That Section 2. 52.025 of the Salt Lake City Code be, and the same hereby is, enacted to read as follows: 2.52.025 Early Retirement Incentive Program. A. Purpose. 1. It is the intent and purpose of this ordinance to provide a gratuitous award to qualified retiring employees of Salt Lake City Corporation for their valued years of service to the City and to establish a cost-effective,City management mechanism to encourage eligible employees to retire at specified times, according to optional retirement incentives . 2. The Provisions of this ordinance are not employee benefits and do not create or vest any property interests or contract rights. The City Council reserves the right to amend, modify or repeal this ordinance and its terms and conditions at any time. B. Definitions as used in this section. 1. "Base pay" shall mean the gross salary (excluding incentive payments, overtime and other additional allowances ) the employee, who is retiring under the Early Retirement Incentive Program, is receiving on the date the employee became eligible for the elected incentive. 2. "Employee" shall mean a full-time salaried employee of Salt Lake City Corporation. 3. "Member of the Firefighter' s Retirement System" shall mean an employee who belongs to the retirement system established by the Utah Firefighter' s Retirement Act, Chapter 5, Title 49 of the Utah Code Annotated, and any successor statutes. 4. "Member of the Public Employees ' Retirement System" shall mean an employee who belongs to the contributory or noncontributory retirement system established by the Utah Public Employees ' Retirement Act, Chapter 2, Title 49 of the Utah Code Annotated and the Utah Public Employees ' Noncontributory Act, Chapter 3, Title 49 of the Utah Code Annotated and any successor statute. 5. "Member of the Public Safety Retirement System" shall mean an employee who belongs to the retirement system established by the Utah Public Safety Retirement Act, Chapter 4, Title 49 of the Utah Code Annotated and any successor statutes. 6. "Window period" shall mean the period of time between July 1 and August 31. -2- 7. "Years of Service" shall mean the number of periods, to consist of twelve full months, during which an employee performed employment services for Salt Lake City Corporation as determined by the City, according to its personnel records. No other services or employment shall be included. C. Eligibility for Incentive A.1. 1 . An employee who is a member of the Public Employees ' Retirement System and, who has thirty years of service with Salt Lake City Corporation, shall be eligible to retire at any age under this Incentive A. 1 . 2. An eligible employee, who retires under this Incentive A. 1 . , shall receive the following gratuitous award: Two months ' base pay, 100% of the employee's accrued, unused vacation and 100% of the employee ' s accrued, unused sick leave; provided that the total award under this Incentive A. 1. shall not exceed one ( 1 ) times the employee' s annual base pay. 3. An employee who is a member of the Firefighter' s Retirement System or the Public Safety Retirement System shall not be eligible for this Incentive A. 1 . D. Eligibility for Incentive A.2. 1. An employee who is a member of the Public Employees ' Retirement System and, who has thirty years of service with Salt Lake City Corporation, but who does not retire under this Incentive A. 1. because the employee is not yet eligible for social security benefits, shall be eligible to retire under this Incentive A.2. at age sixty two. -3- 2. An eligible employee who retires under this Incentive A.2. shall receive the following gratuitous award: Two ( 2 ) months ' base pay, 100% of the employee' s accrued, unused vacation and 100% of the employee' s accrued, unused sick leave; provided that the total award under this Incentive A.2. shall not exceed one times the employee's annual base pay. 3. An employee who is a member of the Firefighter' s Retirement System or the Public Safety Retirement System shall not be eligible for this Incentive A.2. E. Eligibility for Incentive B. 1 . An employee who is a member of the Public Employees ' Retirement System, who is sixty two years of age and who has ten or more years of service with Salt Lake City Corporation, shall be eligible to retire under this Incentive B. 2. An eligible employee who retires under this Incentive B. shall receive the following gratuitous award: One month' s base pay, 100% of the employee' s accrued, unused vacation and 100% of the employee's accrued, unused sick leave; provided that the total incentive award under this Incentive B. shall not exceed one times the employee' s annual base pay. 3. An employee who is a member of the Firefighter' s Retirement System or the Public Safety Retirement System shall not be eligible for this Incentive B. F. Eligibility for Incentive C. 1 . An employee who is a member of the Public Employees ' Retirement System, who is sixty five years of age and who has -4- four or more years of service with Salt Lake City Corporation, is eligible to retire under this Incentive C. 2. An eligible employee who retires under this Incentive C. shall receive the following gratuitous award: One month' s base pay, 100% of the employee' s accrued, unused vacation and 100% of the employee' s accrued, unused sick leave; provided that the total award under this Incentive C. shall not exceed one times the employee' s annual base pay. 3. A member of the Firefighter' s Retirement System or the Public Safety Retirement System shall not be eligible for this Incentive C. E. Eligibility for Incentive D.1. 1. An employee who is a member of the Firefighter' s Retirement System or the Public Safety Retirement System, and who has twenty years of service with Salt Lake City Corporation, shall be eligible to retire under this Incentive D. 1 . 2. An eligible employee who retires under this Incentive D. 1. shall receive the following gratuitous award: Two months ' base pay, 100% of the employee' s accrued, unused vacation and 100% of the employee' s accrued, unused sick leave not to exceed in value a maximum of 4. 5 months of sick leave. 3. The total award under this Incentive D. 1 . shall not exceed one times the employee' s annual base pay. 4. An employee who is a member of the Public EmployeeS Retirement System shall not be eligible for this Incentive D. 1 . -5- F. Eligibility for Incentive D.2. 1 . An employee who is a member of the Firefighter' s Retirement System or the Public Safety Retirement System, and who has twenty five years of service with Salt Lake City Corporation, shall be eligible to retire under this Incentive D.2. 2. An eligible employee who retires under this Incentive D. 2. shall receive the following gratuitous award: Two months ' base pay, 100% of the employee' s accrued, unused vacation and 100% of accrued, unused sick leave not to exceed in value a maximum six months of sick leave. 3. The total award under this Incentive D.2. shall not exceed one times the employee' s annual base pay. 4. An employee who is a member of the Public Employees ' Retirement System is not eligible for this Incentive D.2. G. Implementation for Incentives A.1. , A.2. , B. or C. 1 . An employee, who is a member of the Public Employees ' Retirement System, and who is eligible to retire under Incentives A. 1 . , A.2. , B. or C. may retire at any time during the period of the employee' s eligibility, provided that fifty percent of the incentive award shall be paid during the first window period following the employee' s actual date of retirement and the remaining fifty percent of the award shall be paid according to Section 2. 52.025 ( I ) . 2. As a condition for receipt of the award under Incentives A. 1 . , A.2. , B. or C. , the eligible employee, one -6- month prior to the employee' s actual date of retirement, shall notify, in writing, the employee' s department head and the City' s Department of Human Resource Management of the employee' s election to retire under the Early Retirement Incentive Program. H. Implementation under Incentives D.1. and D.2. 1 . As a condition to receipt of the award under Incentives D. 1 . and D.2. , the eligible employee shall retire and be off the City payroll during the first window period (which is the time period between July 1 and August 31 ) following the anniversary date the employee has completed twenty years of service, if the employee elects to retire under Incentive D. 1 . , or twenty five years of service, if the employee elects to retire under Incentive D.2. 2. As a condition to receipt of the award under Incentives D. 1 . and D.2. the eligible employee shall notify his or her department head and the City' s Department of Human Resource Management, in writing, between July 1 and July 14 in the year employee retires, that the employee elects to retire under Incentive D. 1. or D. 2. I. Payment of the Awards. Employees who are eligible for an award under the Early Retirement Incentive Program provided by this Section 2. 52.025 shall be paid the award in two installments as follows: 1. For Incentives A. 1. , A.2. , B. and C. , fifty percent of the award shall be paid during the first window following the actual date of the employee' s retirement. For Incentives D. 1. -7- and D.2. , fifty percent of the award shall be paid during the window period in which the employee retires and is off the City payroll. 2. The remaining fifty percent of the award shall be paid within six months from the date the employee received the first installment. J. Impact on the Department Budget. The position which is vacated by the retirement of an employee under this Early Retirement Incentive Program shall remain open, until the cost of the award is recouped in the respective department ' s budget. K. Grandfather in Eligible Employees who are members of the Firefighter' s Retirement System and the Public Safety Retirement System. Employees, who are members of the Firefighter' s Retirement System or the Public Safety Retirement System, and who have twenty or more years of service with Salt Lake City Corporation on the effective date of this ordinance, shall be eligible to retire under the provisions of Executive Order No. 3 . 11.300, Salt Lake City Policy Manual, dated September 26, 1988. L. Separate from Other Retirement Systems. The terms and conditions of this Early Retirement Incentive Program shall be construed separate and apart from any other retirement plans, including the Utah State Retirement System. M. Supersedes Other Policies. -8- Except as provided in subsection K. , this Early Retirement Incentive Program shall supersede Executive Order 3 . 11 .300 of the Salt Lake City Corporation Policies and Procedures Manual . N. Amendment. The City Council reserves the right to amend, modify or repeal this ordinance, its terms and conditions at any time. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective upon its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor's action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER -9- (SEAL) Bill No. OF 1989. Published: FMN:rc -10- LEROY W. HOOTON, JR. • DIRECTOR !' WENDELL E. EVEN SEN, P.E. c► 111 SUPERINTENDENT SAI,. r �. Tl GORO �I,® j WATER SUPPLY & WATERWORKS E. TIM DOXEY SUPERINTENDENT ; :DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC •UTILITIES WATER RECLAMATION "WATER SUPPLY & WATERWORKS PALMER DEPAULIS JAMES M. LEWIS, C.P.A. - T WATER'RECLAMATION,-;- MAYOR CHIEF FINANCE & - ACCOUNTING OFFICER -1530 SOUTH.WEST.TEMPLE GEORGE JORGENSEN, P.E. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 CHIEF ENGINEER February 7, 1989 TO: Salt Lake City Council RE: Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County for a Flood Control Permit for the 6200 South Pump Station Replacement Project No. 34-P-16-1. Recommendation: That the Council approve the agreement and forward to the Mayor for execution in behalf of the City. Availability of Funds: Budget $100.00 Discussion: Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities has a need to replace the City's 6200 South Pump Station before this years irrigation season. This Flood Control agreement is required to obtain the conditional use permit for the new facility. The agreement was modified by Ray Montgomery of the City Attorney's office. 1. Please return three (3) agreements to this office to be forwarded to Salt Lake County for final execution. Submitted by: L RI W.)6A-4p N, JR. Director Department of Public Utilities /srb Attachments 67-16-2 RESOLUTION NO. OF 1988 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND SALT LAKE COUNTY WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13, U.C.A. , 1953, as amended, allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1 . It does hereby approve the attached agreement generally described as follows: A flood control permit for the installation of a new pump house at the City' s 6200 South pump station. 2 . Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah, is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989 . SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER RLM: rc 'C ` PERMIT# dr,... U,*;, SALT LAKE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT F`��i ///�� t- .i e m FLOOD CONTROL & HIGHWAYS v! ,. 1 4. 2001 S STATE ST#N3300 "i ^� ` SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84190-4600 IS ear � ` Q . . ›,4�` ,� 801-468-3731 .4!` A COMMISSIONER LJ N _. DAVE WATSON DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS JOHN D. HISKEY ADMINISTRATORS DIRECTOR ENGINEERING MANAGER TOSHIHARU KANO, P.E. DAVID R. LOVELL, P.E. FIELD SERVICES MANAGER NEIL D. STACK, P.E. FLOOD CONTROL PERMIT USE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY RIGHT-OF-ENTRY OR INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES Permission is hereby granted to: SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION DEPT, OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 1530 South West Temple (Name of Firm or Individual) (Address) Phone: 483-6785 Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 TO: (Describe in these spaces the proposal,including kind and type of construction, purpose intended, location by stationing. Indicate passageway provided by means of gates, etc. Use separate sheets if necessary, identifying each by reference herein. Provide all engineering calculations.Attach drawings and sketches as required.) 6200 South Pump Station Replacement, Project No, 34—P-,16-.1 Provided that: otherwise)the grantee shall remove all structures,improvements or ave een erected or constructed under this permit,and o ion of the flood control facility or right-of-way which may have been damaged r. kA The structure or operation for which this permit is issued shall be maintained by the grantee in such manner as shall not injure or damage the flood protection structure, or interfere with its operation and maintenance in accordance with Title VII of the Ordinances of Salt Lake County. The ctructurc or operation covered by this permit may be st_oppPii, remnvPd, damn, or destroyed by the grantor in time of flood emergency if such action is de - ��ined by the grantor to be necessary in order to preserve life or property • •revent damage and the grantor shall not be liable to the grantee for su • image or destruction. Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, t = permit may be cancelled at any time by the grantor upon 10 days writt- • notice mailed to the address shown above. During such 10 day period (or such o period as may be provided herein) , the grantee will be permitted to res'. •e any property or improvements installed under this permit, and to repai • replace any damage to the flood protection right-of- way or structures re . ing from his use or operations. At the end of such period, the grantor sh. ave the right to possess and dispose of any such property or im- provement- emaining upon its right-of-way, and may proceed to repair or replace any damage, and the grantee herein shall be liable to the grantor for the full _• =•airs or replacemenSe. The construction, installation and maintenance of the structure or structures covered by this permit shall be subject to inspection by representatives of the grantor and the County at all reasonable times. In the event the work covered by this permit consists of or includes major con- struction, the cost of inspection thereof by the grantor and/or the County shall be paid by the applicant. Grantee agrees that it will not use the area or facilities covered by this permit, or permit such area to be used, for any purpose other than is specifically covered by this permit. (Use these spaces for special conditions applicable to this permit) . THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE VALID UNTIL APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF SALT LAKE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY DIVISION OR HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. Terms of this permit are hereby accepted. Approval/Nonapproval Recommended: Signature (Grantee) Date Date Title Date APPROVED: Director Date C O N TRACT ROUTING FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC UTILITIES DATE: 2/10/89 DEPARTMENTAL CONTACT: CHRIS OAKDEN PERMIT FROM THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS TO CONSTRUCT .A SUBJECT: NEW DRYING BED ANT) WETLANDS ECOSYSTEM TO DEMONSTRATE THE USE OF TREAT D WAS-TEWATER F-OR EN N EMENT AF [ ETLANIS SIGNATURE: I ' YES ( NO Number of Executed 1 (One) XX Documents Required: Insurance Required Expected Contract Completion Date: Insurance Attached FINANCE COMMENTS: F Account Number: ATTORNEY COMMENTS: RECORDER COMMENTS: returned to on (contact or dept. ) (date) il LEROY W. HOOTON, JR. DIRECTOR JI WENDELL E. EVENSEN, P.ESUPE . �(\C'�) A` WATER SUPPRLI NTENDENT Y & WATERWORKS T':L'� a; TiYr�OA��� I�® � DOXEY SUPERINTENDENT DEPARTMENT.OF,. PUBLIC .UTILITIES WATER RECLAMATION 'WATER SUPPLY.% WATERWORKS nM M. LEWIS, C.P.A. WATER:,REGLAMATION- CHIEF FINANCE & � —� PALMER DEPAULIS CH MAYOR ACCOUNTING OFFICER 15.30__SIOUTHINESST_TEMPLE-- GEORGE JORGENSEN, P.E. SALT LAKECITY, UTAH 84115 CHIEF ENGINEER November 15, 1988 TO: Salt Lake City Council RE: PERMIT FROM THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS TO CONSTRUCT A NEW DRYING BED AND WETLANDS ECOSYSTEM TO DEMONSTRATE THE USE OF TREATED WASTEWATER FOR ENHANCEMENT OF WETLANDS Recommendation: That the City Council approve the above noted permit. Availability of Funds: N/A Discussion: The Salt Lake Council approved in the April 1988 budget opening, the construction of a wetlands park to be located north of the existing treatment facility. As a requirement for the construction, it is necessary to acquire a permit from the Department of the Army, Sacramento District, Corps of Engineers . The attached permit No. 10057 will allow Salt Lake City to construct the wetlands project and an additional drying bed to be included in the F. Y. 89/90 Budget. It has been determined that the drying bed is necessary due to increased solids removal from the improved wastewater treatment processes. 04201 #J.-Vi15* - LEROY p HOOTON Director LWH/co FORMS RESOLUTION NO. OF 1989 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WHEREAS, Title 11 , Chapter 13, U.C.A. , 1953, as amended, allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1 . It does hereby approve the attached agreement generally described as follows : A permit to discharge earth fill on five acres of wetland for and construction of new sludge drying beds and to grade, excavate and redistribute fill to construct a wetlands ecosystem to demonstrate the use of treated wastewater for enhancement of wetlands. 2 . Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah, is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989 . SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER RLM: rc r r , DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Permittee Salt Lake City Corporation Permit No. 10057 Issuing Office Sacramento District, Corps of Engineers NOTE: The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permittee or any future transferee. The term "this office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the Corps of Engineers having jurisdiction over the permitted activity or the appropriate official of that office acting under the authority of the commanding officer. You are authorized to perform work in accordance with the terms and conditions specified below. Project Description: To discharge 15,600 cubic yards of earth fill into 5 acres of wetlands for the construction of new sludge drying beds and to grade, excavate and redistribute approximately 25,000 cubic yards of fill to construct berms, ponds, channels and water control structures. This project is designed to demonstrate the use of treated wastewater for enhancement of wetlands. In addition, the project will be accessible to the public for observation and study of wetland ecosystems. All work shall be performed in accordance with the attached plans titled, SALT LAKE CITY WETLANDS ENHANCEMENT, sheets 1 of 11 through 11 of 11 dated December 1988. Project Location: The project is located at 1365 West 2300 North, and within Sections 15 and 22, Township 1 North, Range 1 West, in Salt Lake County, Utah. Permit Conditions: General Conditions: 1. The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on January 31, 1992 . If you find that you need more time to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least one month before the above date is reached. 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and condi- tions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and state coordina- tion required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. ENG FORM 1721,Nov 86 EDITION OF SEP 82 IS OBSOLETE. (33 CFR 325 (Appendix A)) 1 ♦ I 4. If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must obtain the signature of the new owner in the apace provided and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization. 5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project,you must comply with the conditions specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit. For your convenience, a copy of the certification is attached if it con- tains such conditions. 6. You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit. Special Conditions: (a) The pormittee shall submit final grading and construction plans to the Corps of Engineers' Salt Lake City Regulatory Office for approval prior to construction. This is to assure that the project is built in accordance with the concept plans. (b) The permittee shall insure that all construction equipment be refueled and maintained at an upland site away from the existing wetlands. This will help prevent the accidental spilling of petroleum products into the aquatic ecosystem - which could contribute to water quality degradation. -- Further Information: • )A 1. Congressional Authorities:You have been authorized to undertake the activity described above pursuant to: ( ) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.403). (x) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 U.S.C. 1344). ( ) Section 103 of the Marine Protection,Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972(33 U.S.C. 1413). 2. Limits of this authorization. a. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal,state,or local authorizations required by law. b. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. c. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others. d. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project. 3. Limits of Federal Liability.In issuing this permit,the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following: a. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural causes. b. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or on behalf of the United States in the public interest.- . c. Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused by the activity authorized by this permit. d. Design or construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work. 2 e. Damage claims associated with any future modification,suspension,or revocation of this permit. 4. Reliance on Applicant's Data: The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made in reliance on the information you provided. 5. Reevaluation of Permit Decision. This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances warrant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following: a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. b. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete, or inaccurate(See 4 above). c. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision. Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4 and 326.6. The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order requiring you to comply with the terms and conditions of your permit and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate. You will be required to pay for any corrective measures ordered by this office, and if you fail to comply with such directive, this office may in certain situations (such as those specified in 33 CFR 209.170) accomplish the corrective measures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the cost. 6, Extensions. General condition 1 establishes a time limit for the completion of the activity authorized by this permit. Unless there are circumstances requiring either a prompt completion of the authorized activity or a reevaluation of the public interest decision, the Corps will normally give favorable consideration to a request for an extension of this time limit. Your signature below, as permittee, indicates that you accept and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. (PERMITTEE) (DATE) This permit becomes effective when the Federal official, designated to act for the Secretary of the Army, has signed below. (DISTRICT ENGINEER) (DATE) When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred,the terms and conditions of this permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s)of the property.To validate the transfer of this permit and the associated liabilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions,have the transferee sign and date below_ (TRANSFEREE) (DATE) 3 U.S.GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1986—717-425 \\ ELI . R ER•} : . ,..,,.. - \ 9 _ SI hon 1 •I(. ' -.-;:i.i' l I '° I r / -•` q I ill XIt7 i • • Radio I .( / 1 31' _ :.! I: .I ('+ ": Towers v O ••u ...I f .. J n ., v \, o I� 4/ \^ I .� ill I Yjf�(•c � r v I - • 11 I I y i .Il 42l7 \\ Siphon. ••..•I.�•,I• •, [" I \Ij E LLE SUPPLY UNA L. 11 i• ___ aONN Vl _ _— tltl • •• •� I I�I-!.I' A - ••••• II a 1' a r_ = G Hi;. _ . 1. - - lr = ; • ... ;'L i ;i I � ' .u I • ii,( ,-f=5,:i•T'-"7....:::,-:•::7, 0 i L.:: ' • ..",r 7.., • • i�o till -_ (y :i. .j L. 3p o :1 -1 SALT LAKE CITY j o - 0 L 'c I A� CORPOR.aT i I [ r, (- e7/ c Radio Towers i 4 ql 1 I' • 1 I 1 Becks '�' f' SCta tZ_!_6_= •`l1 i ______________°II (BM 4:2211. r:/ ;• (, �r h�� \ 1 A i ir JJ>R1Uf) I la. 1 ! 1711 li II2 !! I I �� ;�; __ p- a __ — I- hGNarel ' •I � Sewage S 0.••• „`n Disposal • thtt I rq _ 11 lGrave' czrd \`\ • • • • l =\ u 11 Pat' ,. I I zio • • Il\ yI/ '�" li • I = I -i !,%, 1 1, ROSE \ I �� " �. 1 i PARK �• �\ - \\� i! \ I I - GOLF COURSE --_ \ a\\\ _ "- • \\` r • • •• • 1� , • „ 'JnjHS:I Northwest - II • , I ).., -_,_,_._,__._ \ \ O� • ,:.. 1_ �• III' 1 \ IZ ° ;I _it`- • It I° , \ 1 • • • m •a \ I L I J`tathesom.,\ '"-\ •� I 1- I l7. H,.`L NN�_57, :Sch 1 , �b • O • ' I• I I_ 'I i L N'il—'- I . -I O I I 1 ` V . --'s r•.3. • 1 ,21 s l I �I _ I _= :u •1_ t1T —�n 1 �I _IINo.7THl� 1,fI�IISnu Hie "i 'b:• I .� ,i j- , o cz H. I; --.i _ 1 it I• I. Lli ,II =1; •\ 'Z O�I �I Y\ase ark Schi_ II •� • i •T. NaLGu rd• 1 : \ .1_ —1f�f d—'e--11-`rd II _ �1 Il�� x" CITY — " "'- E !1�Ij:: .Ise.i I -. .",•,::: I2 �I: . r- SAL; L ,-Uc. c-IT '7 •.. i �:_. 1.6TN NORTH' S IA' AIRPORT I I,; L _ —,L: -.� WcTr ANDS EN(if{ �CE `tnn i • 1 i 1 1,.. •,II, •.i _ 1 11 III ,y.C4 C E I I j:',.. o!�rlil J• II it ii -3. < __emu' .- . _•.,!.,. •....,. ....,,,..-.,_ _,. r---- •----•-„, ,..,•••, 2,...,....-1,:••;:i•i::.5.::•-•--, :', •-:-),:zi•:.• `r.-•%...;,-'•:•-. ..--••• .:•':',,-. ••••) . •-••••....• -i ; • ;•i..:•1.•.. ••• • 0, -, :--•l' I 4:-:;..:-.,! ;:s4), _..:..f..:, •k.:::-.f..k..::::-/..-. . ..-(N.;:ge;X. 7....-s.i .4: •1:- ..s= • . .41,....3.•i.':i• •,..7.,,f,::44fm•-•—.t" •-f..441_7:.-1...:',1`;„ 1 lc-.. -'-'. .-• v!z---. .•t,.. .4.-..z......,'',..,1.:-?..,.?;..,:•:,!:. , .S.,....;-.,.5`,.qp-,-..;*.;1:•:$•"•51' At .-.;.).- Y .-.'-'''• •''.:*.--,:-,..--4'::::..:',..,-4-,- -.4.P.,,-., N!!'''5•.'ff 4, .5.t.P.•..,K A -. • r • .. •.- . • • • -„,-.•-•-- • .....-k„ •, . .•t• ',....,r. :t,..• , . :),.p•?•.-.. .".,...:•-•,..,:.• •;•::,..,,..::•:,.,_. • • . •:.•.••,.z• ,• •,, .,. ,•,, . .4..,... .. • . • ...... 4:_,:(.. -,... ..•...---,.\,.... N.• ,.:.:.:•••.... x - t,...? 4.,.,-:-.:1,..:.:f.1,• et....•T.C.'.,,..• • .., •••,...A.,0 3.. .,-.../ ?:.::j"; •:.:Y;t).... -' 1;:•:?t•-•;;;/ ,•;.‘'.:'•••••:•...:..",sff-t '•:Xi ?......:, .i.'...:j; -i:-'.•,,•. i... ."4 --, I v:: e LI,:r 70.21,e-r;'11 .....k.,:;.,, ...,t.:....4,:.,14;,....;,%.:,..,..\\„,.. ....,„ z . t-$.,k,..4,1i r io orEle- -.., .-...., c;-!k.,--1,C.;i•P.Pit..i5. ..: ---.--...:I,• 'C'...-!, .rk-M --- ----- --ty.--:,-4w;.5,114-11;: I' eei,r'5. ,-.:.'i-5-i1i''AV{,,,:,17:e27..7.vox,-..4 1,1i •::\-i-\*••ti..1.-pi_.41',.:7hN ;3 <• •t`3,':'. .tCr,...••••7114•,;..„...4..4zi.'i;tr.'el•' .0fiji:11-.7."OF r,'IlY•ks.."1!","t?':!.•'.. It?..:%4 t•:=41. 8 ., ./i: ..,;;.-22-0-7...0/;7. ••.! . .., ..-if-, , .. ..,..:•,(41,.• :...i it.,.%.J...- 1,... , .,. . ,0-1.1.ta.7,-*• f it-s-'',....),......;,' - •••'''•;•::•;rib.:-5' kl'•-•11 /13';','"'•• '••, .....".'.., 0 .•., ' i•Of..;'.'‘ 1•:= • • ••:*1.-, ..74.V.t'g -.L.4 01)1,-..-,••:.;.1-:.-,..1-• / •:-.:4.-4) 1-"::.i.v. ,-, . ..._ ,t,...+1 , .,4„..•‘!..• ,......,; c...,../, ..._:-..k....y. )if,._•„-,,! m 0 .. •\i,-41...A ,.., • - s: ,,.....,• •i'4, :'-'1%--‘•1".r•-•'' • •.!'17 1,-'•^-4' O , : . .;;:gf :,1, • .: /S,*/•stli't. •).-...-4&t.... , .,_„-.,::,,,i, w;,4 ,-. -• f . v...- • -, ...:, ,t-sy,L,...-..-•:---..-•----- --lc.4J-T,Iy tile;•.•,,ei ,,,'b.::-II.N--1--- •• ...-•----1-:•74-1:•;-,;i:,:.tt•::- -..,,,r ::-,.• 47-;:.4, ..t/2„..44/'---„,-;•;„ ,r ;v---,77,7r,•?.;',t7i,.,zi:'•.;-''' 1.,-.::Vii.,..?:-N, HT' 1 0 : :.• ., -•-•••••„ .. . ..:•• •r••-avt,ig•xe‘!t ijr/o.viaA"1::f•11,...„.„ i •••••„.••,,.1171•••.1/.. rztiv. .ir..3 .11,%.;47.. . • •• /..:.•,1)-_,;:...21 I k4 ra:.:.i.F_:..,b 6 II u9 -.‘ - • • ,••-•1'.1-.110.#40• /4•kr.lst•,vv-Igo. •,-1-; 4,./..-""\ /.....-.1:•••'r• 3.. I .. ....,.. • , •- •...,,,„.":1- / ••,,,.,- :PA......e.---....9, • .....•......-,•. _ ,•:.•:•...,- 2-•••.. -. _yr- •• -• ,.•••• ••-•••r--- .-N./ ••It..,....ci 44:•.,.1.1.•:;•-p,-.V.., ....,•••x,, a:v.0:r T.',.. .1,I!..C-L. . -':" --- '-'41440-4:-..,::-•f•-,-i.,4,-.411 1 .ei. ..Y.i.,-,4•1•47:-"1:4P.\.4,74., •;•,•,.;!,.,.....„;.7.4..,•;•,•,'..1:-,I.1.,4 A-•<,k.y.• { LH „t•-,,...,,,,• 1,,,,,,,. , ,..1,....•:•,.. :•%,:.1,-..?4,,,,,,;:,,,)*.,•,-.20:•%,,..y.44.„:,-:;;...,,-:,,,::::4,;•-•1,,zii-1.(:f.;•Ifi,: ,,,,,.,,, .r...:41,..tgl.. , :,,..:::::....i;.-i) ob.\.1w_r!,:ld. g..,-,..,, .. s ' ,, ` - ,--...4..:4-‘-;i..4"..-51 ,f.,..,,(...1,-,,..;. :.;.4.-1'!..\-Er. n. ,---!•;;!.., 4.;::;".:1:':,,:•••V;siat,-;.1.1.-1‘.•‘:'5'. ,.7.! . •;,.....:-.:1;"?.::kil LA 1 '••••'-'1.--.4''.-;...-•:‘4 ' •• 0 •0 :, -'4:.›•• .--.m".'71!,.,:r"-11%---4..___„:'- `7:*''`I's 1;.:.:„:.,:lisp i‘y , „ • \v., _ .- ,r. .,-,•••••!,,:rt .,..em . - u • 1-- _, ,•-•,-v,;,...,...7,-„..,.....,. .i.- .,-.;,:,-.r..... .......... f. ,:i.;:'.41. : i.,...... ........,-.7p•-•4.4Z .,4.4•:‘,.,;.....,p.:•,,..a.•,....)-4' \ • . .--) . if:•0:-,.-t,it ', ;.4 .;,-..:,,I:16 t.'"....••:.,.._. ........nir,....... , 0 .c.f.;:i„...12. '..",r,,;.-,,-.-4:, ,• v-, _,......z.--•-:.•::- 0, . a i i.„t.W:7" N r •• ....4 iI.:..ii: : -.-1.1..;E:::_".i•iii ':: •;(''•-: -.11-4.2*."_.?..::::'-.7-:• -•:••- recr ..:-.7.7. .:,7-'441....-4•3-:%. -..,, 1 __.• L_.__ ? , ,.,„ ,..,..,,,..„„.„,•, ,. • --„,,....!4:2 •-. ..74:74.7jzg.. .7.; .\ .-n,....r4.3er•-•;;.4 's "Al T- --v• ..f o tic•a v- ir • . . . , --,-.1,-,2c-t.,, ), IC 'ex_.-.X.It "•••••••15):..:-.4, 1;'••••'- „Er. ...• ...,t, . : ... ....•. ..,,,,,,,,, /2, i.. ,./. 111..ar MATCH LINE A''.1--..7.71,70 ;;,•,•-,..g::!ft-.... Ir.,-•.," .•. 7 ....'s . _.-... : ,.. ai it:..?-1A1 -....t•e;ti-4blej•Per. 'Itt. :s.. •-..- :i ,,,, ti..Li.,.....,r;',..5.44wii•AK,:bie_ilp.,-,,,,,r-;.*c ::.,:rs...-' ,6.-•,,q?...t•-•: -.'7,-,2.,'-.-,.t,;:s:,.,4-...,_'-ct:t. -,...-K-1 ,:.4.--,.:7--‘ :Dis iri. ----,--—- --:-'!". ....... .'"' V n ,--,. 1,-,_-r,-.,-.?.-,,-ii- :.....,:,-....:.::-- --,.-„, . 1": 4C/ :-Itt.,:,- ,4"1.!--''..Li r A9 1,71.:::r -..i4'-. • C _ • .-.:w:V.::*., ,.t.T1 t-',:. .1 V' : :.7;1•-.,,11-. ..: -."..;g b':-.;',*itOr-!:1••1.",a; 'i,;''• • In'''g 1 8 -3 :, .. .,....4;...,-,ev. ,..,,...,--.-,_...9? . ,- ;. ;-.v:.-4.i.,_•-,....r644,iir,t ,:;,.:-.:•=,....r.-n24 ...*-•-' . .7 ; -4. .: -ti", 15--.ty,t-rF.74.t.-ike....,:i•k--- :. --. , :-;_ --gP,141,.:;,a%•-•weri...,S_•!--,---:.,g;i:.,-..t.4=:',.'.f.A...- -.., '- ta$1-1- "rte..-5,-1,_v..__•...et.-A-, .•• . .- ,.. --._s,--. ......-.41ftiiirreilF.••''44.-''''NZ..-1'...">4%.''.• - ,)1../I.C-1 • : 1.i. - • •''''•-•--1_1;17-- ''.---! ' ::--' ,--‘ s-7-•-•••••,4;:•L•i....e;." •••••-li:12!,4.1'.'7i.-7.7,4;)-if;,•,',3,-ti,....'e.;-.6:k. . .-- -.OM.. - , . .. :..t..." -.:...:.- •?•-•:2S.z. ,,,-,.." .. -s.1;:;_,:-.!F-.,-:,--.:•-;,•;I-fp- •:..-.-,,,,-5,„,„r.., •,r_ . - --.-- rs: --.. .17 :.-. ; • ;.-- : -,. .-: • -!•;-•-,---,,,, 4,-,,,- ',. .-,.: •- -*:-._-•• ..--..--,-.-% :--w--1..-- - '‘.'' m • •. . ,._ :: ., .- .... . .if--.i.,,,e•=4.,!„!„..y.“.4,:.:1: .r._ . ., --. .. .A; ' „ 4;11 -I • - / . 1:: • . :-=,-- ! ariir- *15.•••• ••,7--,70;' :•1- • -.--- --.-,• -,.- : - t-f, 1 .--, . x :::. .- .."..,,,.....1 : :...---c-er,...,,iiicit...,3 _., ...„_.---. -• ..;.--;-- •: -. ,V.; g: . .....A J.,:: a.7'- .;..:-.6"41,'„1 * ;,TA-'_.t*--,-. .,":•f-,1 (-•-''-••-•-• _ii.-.'' --e- $i, . I. o - -• - •••••••••,•,.-:,v., .,.;7,-.1a141.- -::• .. .:: -. .-4- „ :,;feat--t'.i.n. / -:" -:-- 1. . ?!:, -'••• D •-;' ':'''•' kilig"i,1)-: -1:•.:‘-',.!: :-14:-it ... ti.T -'5;•" 4'-''• /.'..•••••'--..,;e: T9i •— tr, -, .-- _A-)47; k.f-••• •;:. •; .1-.- . -7-''' • ia 1•:,""z' -.:,.:•_.;,-. A: - ;;,.(4--Tiy-a•Atr ,‘-^'••••"1. ...,,p•: -•,i v,...4,--11..•- .•,i--• • ••,.-• 4 ;.:. • ku `''' f.---..-_,- .:; •- • •;-.cfg-s,,,,,ct• '.- .. - . --?.•' -4, •-• -7, it.- .t .:„.; •.:. .. b.&, .,. .. ..•-•: .--:: • - !,;•.•:...).17 1-,Ty..-g- ki . ..,..•e,•. r-- Z. - t t•• _ -, 3.3,-f..1 -•-1 er"%. ..-••,.....,: i•,-.T.T 4.,,.-., :-.._A•71-.--- 1 0‘4FDA.1--i-z- A - •- N.:`,••.,"7. -::-• t.',VY:•v„-••:;. ..,, .-•,..?..t., ••• f.,,,.. , ..!'•••••••A _.. A.,..,:::Rtr,..4 s d'4 k 9j.....;•:, i, c , 4,74 --:..1 .I',y,C11-'' '. .,•.*i:..:•T,e`N•t " ..t;..-;7 •:'• ..•: .•`•t-',71.7,'4-',%„ • ' i'''.. . • •i '?'Y27/Z'''''-:•":t.7:I'vt.6" '."--,'il.- 1 `:-:' ...."•- 5: t 'V . .,'-'.'' ''. V.4-.0•-•.; '",, ...... ••-• . - \-k‹.•-•'.'-'..s.,;...,. ...„.•;, • •, ;ills. •71,....4 Z14,i.....,..-..,...- qi. t.p.,.s...,... e•,t ..' ' 4 ' .....1 . ,....7. ,•.:A..4.71c-' D" ,.., ;„-,4, -I,„_A:, •N•-•:t;•.•t:., i:i ii.% ..sr,i5 ;••..'7":.1...7..-:•-•.' • . ••- • ,,,ge,i• -..-.... ,,_- ,„pas-z, III • iksm•- •1:,;,•",,-• 1:-:, t4 ,:... -•• •..• • " ••7-• • - -1 ' 1,, ,..5- ••/,• , Al, •..r-- 4, -, 004. 1 --'-•-,...:-- . . • •--,-• ' • , •-,,. •• " 'f!-!1"--.4.....4p i;-,.:A „,.&„---.:::1;:' 4- e-..,,,,- .,..... •.: :••••-•-••••••,...,::••.,,.......t.- - --2- • •• <.. ! I., .. r..:,: --e. -.-flp:4_4-i;_z.,,,-;- 4.-,,..s.i:A .;:.-.• -,.;•• -..,...z: ;:y.•''.... . .,,..,13.1p.,, 47i:1..1;y'„, ....:011,--oxei., ,•,....• t r• ..-...- •--!• •-.••••••• " ••" '' ••••.r.CZY• '."'"..1,,,,**tit. •I IV . •‘• . .....-5.10:::-r..'''" git -,•..-.% • -4.,• .." . . - ..-",...f.r....'4* ,,..•,.44ez•••• is) ,411 5.-- :1 ...,,,/;•t- ,1 it:..-Is I ‘: ... .•••••'''r:. -7•5'1":7!' ilr•L'i#1. ojr . 1 L • ... .7,r4.§z..1 Ai,. ..:, .,,,,'....11.7fry.0,-4.a...•?1:3 V.,,,• ., ,. - —) •••:' • .1:".T Z,VP1.7.'it•V ;...;;f:- 4e........',7. • ,— •I ' • -— •,,r, iziWel .' '7.•. $' • 44','.• 'II$ . verik:i ...'.-.4gic.ie,.....j•.`q` . f*,•:. .•--' .., Visi4.9. '• 1,.50M"-"'' ' ...f.•.': . • ft ri_a 1 it• ..4j9.e.,71155.4&,.. t.st,..... . -..Z.V.,-- 7..:5‘, ..n.2..t.a.4•14.W.: 4114,. . q' A-•:- .?1:72:ift...TM•flif4$441 .1.:tte.-xt, M--x-% Zwii•d. - •rd ' . ..._ .,,,i_. -. 4•:•., -0 . •••.• UN I , •4••••••••-•4 • r.4‹,,, !..1,.et•••. • 4 1 .••••'..."1.'. r•:'• ...t:. .".. .'1,..1. .....q..4.:• ••••tti''..71447'.. I n mAtcH.:.ut,E-±r__,--..,-;:-.7.7-2........--r.-':,:;....,,.i.---,40.;;;:-:.:'-rx.,;:::'.,.,....'!"‘-'t,'1.;,_`'"".,....„..w.. ...,". :or .',-,e'-.4----,..•-&,4:11. .,..",::-..".'...' • P• :-'ey---..c4.-..• ••---.7, .•;t5e.-, •••.;;-• tr.37, 0. ..••• '. ' t-• ••••• -i.',- --.-Lrr. . - .1 z.,74.. ,wu. •Ez -.::.....;1j,4,i....•%;•' :7::.-40,4fr,-*. .1 461.•::•.;.;',f.:::.....7:•;', ....;!:-t-'•: 'Z'...:',..,,•!'"..'4 --• • etet'5%...7•V ^ • -,:......-;x - -.'' '' - -'---'..—::: Z-77--7 T7: -7A7•••r ,r.7,r•-•••7.57.,., 'rvIzqz-r0•11"',-).,....: •-:-..-.7•••c,f---•• V -. -.. . rg73-F,-,.--. ;Pii.••iii!?..:•.2• ;',1'1'1'i•-,' ‘...:': : 4..e444'. - :••,..4.,4, ,..,,,,-.-:,,r,.:-:.:17-4,,,,,. ,.• -. .,,,,i,,,., E...,...,,,,- ..4,, •......-y.. .. ',.....t,;...-..--4 ,;.,,'-'•••:. -... 0- -, 1- (.1) ,, -L...,•:•1:1 ....f:.,t::-. 57}1.-.':?4 '9; .• .!.:-:-., .• ..".....t.VNi-,•. 7....•-•-•;2•.:,--..... .1.4.•.: 'n''''.-..7•.:..17: r. ,ffe,%;•.; C ....„1..711.0,1,., •.IL'. , .•.,.,..' ......16...,._:,...,le. ,,..;,...„..-.1-.2: •,2 •-..:..........;,:-:.,::.•--r•z.„-. --4... --... . ,.. _..,..,..Z:-.1,,••-z .... ...,-:,. :,.. -.---4t.".--:-:.•:•------ -4"•':- ' • .... t'''''''.........' ' ....:•••''' ......" '''. III V1%; ' .or .772-'..•..:4',. ..: fj::::-.117 ...:- •.........1":-. .‘.4,...,.i.c..:.5.4..a41•••••,7.-:-"tr f r"..; .:....••' .:-.-,•.", •. ••• fl i 0 : . . .... r. r D c, L--: I Tit;. .t, ,:„. ,.'".....',,:1.3•;'"7,..,...,5-::-.1717" :-‘.r.'...„'::7Z)....4•04;IAlrf...775-2..,Ff-2.:7-411r.;"7::: :'...;..N.RA.. .'.1 ..1... , r: . a, z.....„...,.._:. .i,......iii...1,44...t...7., --.. .,..; ...1%;...-11:7.•.7,.....;;;,-,-r:',.;;S..•. •:7-q".„...-.'•,- ,:-..7,:".... .4-....I5,7`... II ..: (fA r's... '2-1:7'.- . ""!1•5::;4.8NV'''‘ . • !".'...-7.:ti•••=•'-': :4:41#":;•'•"?..77.C-‘4,:: •.:1'71-/'•-..::--.7. ' .."/ •,it,;-2. -;z4z , ..,.1•7e1: ' -I ''' . r".14•Y"•-•••.R.;11 , - - 1---. 'Ll'etdall .rd41C?-4.4.:41-AZ -:'.....•:-.... .f.:../ tp `.. .14,,..-•f i5e...0.-,k_•t.„, J.....;.%•"1-- E?-_:•,-;- ABT45' _.--AFLI--. ,,,,A•.• :z,,v•---.-,--.T--- I., _ ,. - -1.---_-__ ___________ ..- ,••• - 1.:-- 0 ——--- 1 -i-, - • 1 I" c ? " { sue " " :M .�r> ` _ -, - , �v . `i -: * d1 dY r;- .�Z-R� /� 1 l r Ali N AL""' .�i11 c1Zit ;v t: S rAjws-a's• 'r r LA'S ^ bra ? Ir --' " ' - 5 `+- `,, .�Tra ,0.--;� ter- ., A .r ; - F � j ® b.r.- rrr roc - . :.1 I `-' . 1f -S + � a -y;P.a Z.ra, 1 eY ;, c-ri3ry.Treatnw ;^ POND t't� ri Z. : , L '\ 1..ft ( :�e Eck t POND , I =� - at C t' � - • , '" ^"' ;-C_"'1! ztj ,r S3 - ;�7tt+, E 'V ` -t ,y >•'�`�',yl��A.lr.+1r 1��7 �r`w-.� <\ '�' 111 j -.'r �i+`y - M 1 �".�y a _ ='cam t `FL t.' .a-..a ..f t r> 3 `.-.;--1-2`" - I ti" L 2t!1F' r t,•-� i-1 'i4 ..1:ly A. r if i .- 1 [,�(" '."-Elite. 71.n^ *1: tt -.�,� v t • , • r a;"i r - 1 v . ��;a.? •ks y - '�\ -1. i ••ifs T-^ 4..• e�`e, u ' �r I �.r. -� <x, m j7i-S To,U.l,�y� 7 ��`y1 Ti g'r � '.„' r73-.x vt 7 c? I a ...�iWz,, t? rn re. 14 . W - �4T- 1+ r` .p a �t 4, .may -=-4, 1 -r tr-•L f . - • .� -. ---..a,.1 ti r.,C'''^1 ..A 't4 f'"'c. �` Yz-t-�„' :� `'.' t�'it-j J,ti ' v / r � -s- - "r Z �' =MATCr-1:..•LINEI C '' 1 I II I I • I- I I I ' a l I I I I LW , A A, I I U I II U I U , ,i,I I I l i 1 I 1I II I I I I cc-r I cc1I I I II Jc• " ' Ia 'Scc-lc. : 1 = loo z J1 H l lIcc> i I 1 x I 1__ -' _ --/I �_ w U • AL, LA1e...E c1.Y wEi L.CN.S E?,3tthNca A4EK-1I 51.1ee=, 2 0 C I1 i U _ v • + - - d _� s -: J =� � 1 :�I i 0. ..,T.:-_;:..7..-,', . .4,...) l e ? i—1 il s . : C • . _ a . . ^L • o .�- r- --_ , - I. i_I Z: - -� -_4:1 _ter'l? -;Hary•Trec � n�&ih _ • I ..c. a' it It P. }2i 7 • _ � SALT L A-A._G 1 1 -I \,,C 1 L h)J A S G.a`.1 l't 4 U C. n{,o}.,.__ 05 - N M TCN LINE C SVI 3 - -F. ll - n -4 2200 NORTH STREET �,^""try}:fir ..t-t -.1� J C' ,w+---eY- .-..—_• -.m ` k p . lei..:-v,- ' •�;_ Y� A•": l,' y4.t r.� �. T. `t , - -` .L. r fx, ,..-tA,yFxr,,, AF:: y; et_r4 4.-7,4, } ' 4h . �... . _,: l,wL .' wY >..`+ Prat' 1. :as:h:�kz• ,�'r�h .� �! �r r�?3. _," ••` 3-1xar ,t� �'. .-' �� �T i+1 . ..• N. 'r• 'E : _,t_rx...;,, .'f- S . 3 1Z. t 1 \ C"x ‹--mr.•n -;-s _-,4:;`,�r. hti. ..3.'tt., 7-'~ .?-1 _; `~•ry�.a;:4.•li.-.>.J.S7. a r 1• 'i 'r,• x... ,ram �. '' v J. �t-., r 12,..i yr. _4s . ) •.. :;:: t�;sy Y �<<P� .r ��fSs �'�Ip � 1 +e! �sr i ' t•s i �' .: rr f�,u-Y•r?..c - -z1 G v t ,•. 1 F- �+ h�•y^N.' lr x:,`•e`r _ t I S .f.., -,,.,t .r �..R .r - _ -M .],:,,! rp ,_'v ,, n�.,r . _ :�1 "�, :a -x . • •F� a'�^.1, • '„ : ;=1 .x•," l•�' - it,,, -•-•�� ``t- ck t �,.a.0•.n. I .. A� •c ;- } - . +>.t .1'':✓4 LS \ _.. +-� t-L .. ty�y '� rr �.V¢ y..t•L'x - _-.'h s :0--1t�.t-^--:s. "'• l t ' '�' <-4'',} r' '::% �t ,x. �:- - �" '' "••• r -. t� i•+-.-may �� Tn ` Tt_ -4 -'� t ?..qt ��rgc .i • t � J - F c �•J- { 121.Fr5."�j ...•`c x' (�-/ i.}' 4 �+ Yt r \ 1 l '� 1 I ;M++1�'_ w -1 7 C�-'- -.t • ys l:. _ `1 raw a..'r 1.•- .1 • \ 'i • � r •:)' Y=J L 1. r i- - A] 1 t C ice-- -- ` I \ .. _ 4 I +.. • --�-. L"- 6 .`1 7sy� ti a- t Treatment Peo - .1Y "e! Yr`- �. ! C� -.:�.-r'• "'`•,`a-.-`f•a ..n#- Pr"z7 1:= `•i , - _ .r mot "' ." .I Y. •d • • • • { 6a,"? . , s - -- yc.•-f`-' t:^'-r y.., .-'_- .•��!S ,•-' 1 �• '-Zr�' .: • ~ - - j-�f- ` • • -c''. 9'i1 � -v r �y� 2•; 5 . i s'4a `�" "t-: ' ? �. ii-ti, iT;-r;• iw, rye � . X.� 't �„ ,f - 1YS. : y - ash -r x- � r. - - - .t-�+%i r _ c ,r• N .�.•' ,.m '4. _ �� - b3 r w�"7.c �"Y •x�x*^- '1-:�' _ d }. ��Z ', • F3�• :/ =� �. ``' - -,'c—.Ssi-- ,,,�.o ��ir.i•it = .. '=` .�'''-':_ :.: ,.! "�.7 • I �-'-i� • Y (ty.,- N• ..fl`Sx, cam....; 'Lf 1..;... . � - �,+y� ,:".., ' v.}-'i"' „, 1? : 't • L- ; _ ^ ..,1 l' �•y-J , >-t l� c,}f� Z vV.- ....`r- -•CAtY ^l r ti Y- � • i _\e.- t'J� t x tl 4 7. • •y 4'. { I:3.- - ,, - . -qc`� {" te - 15'. r 7-? .- ..L, 1` ` a r i 1 Qy ti 1 �~' • - Y. r et� - ,-i -,;Fc �= POND Ly x ..Tu y. Pj�, c''�s''�yt.. ..< �'t � 'z '3".; .F=r-••• i," ` ifr-ati I` "^ x:- ?�x y .-r-'"�'- t--" t'Sr,. :'r.,- _ _ -3/- r� ��• •-may }}�_ _� 9 ` ^1 .�� "... - ' . - \ ts _' •I'� - l� 7' rlc ,r' i.A4 fr-; � 4t, :} u ' r `• +. S.t.zro e ; !-'� �r'"•-:,-1 1,�n-be ,`. , : a c • : � y _ "-'• , 'v�-r•-""`` ` ' .,-'- iy x A f3�; n� "•1 x Y y !: �y f7 = -;---'•^ ,_ v -�..1c "'•4!1� d-t µxY --t.4 .-,,�X �4' , .-r k1F �,` c .-; --:_. u -, } i ir- • `.. _YrS7V� •4'F� r - f - ,-' ." � 'Y\ >WC; -"` �s " c - s ��Y r+•'-'; Y72"�1 .£._J'';"' 17 -�< r ...i ,2} `- f�, `a • `.l �T - :Csl `0'�"_ t�y 1>-1 ,� �� . .\ .{4 � �' � �. v,7 _'tmy'^AYL� '- yL- ." >`" -L T.'�- ."' v:l _ �`> -'• - -.' .�.: L-'.G: -. .: � --. y F3 . `w - i .5 � -1, f . � �y _ rx r z ; -a; ''' 'S .> J . W C c' y ' -a • • • L � •�J �--.J�•ti;t. S r;--,;:_.� :; 1, - ` `` . S_1--.— -.• ,_ 0 H a 2, S«le : l "---- fop ' in 4 5 I4`-t LPA1Gc (-1 i '/ Wei L.r}X--1 0S CU Hr-?JC ,>•hE-)j ! -- - -- 5kc �� �{ oL 11 is I 2200 NORTH STREET �+ o ) i•f�.. � v L r.ry driCrYx`t`7fj:L'` �'. 11 ^ C2 /" - ,, f:=��:p-t Ti•�� cif •3•. M / '�-I `v�-J nw� j' r",k" }tit' t` 1 3t�. r a JA%'= ? Y ••J. S-'h� }sue a 1"t -3 ,.r .L�f'�3~t47 a 0r.•�-...0..i - �-y yr : . y .. ' +r[- 4,th •••4ha �•. 4 ' G'�k• f'^" '°'l •ti 4 C""' �I Lf fr 1,," y Y sar. s-..�. c. { -_+•te ".•• F• .v T • ;J .A / .. ' ` ' r• ., •dt ` cl; ),.� c ..t r rr=':-•-•a )y i.�:.+.1- .0,- • \77+;.t T h:) i / '' - ..s Fs ti tr• '--: A u• . -r.S yas.�'; ,. 'fit • ( •��.7i ^'�, `�' . •_ `\{ -rZY. t ^...•1{. P4 \ <,[�s �,-. "� L C.j , ,,,,„ ,'` ^ '_.}yam ,-i- i•'�•! • I. - -1 � .• r - :zR..• J- `'•r 3�r,t _ {,w .,_ , • 3 •` Y - S�i s _ �r^�'s-...._•v. - Y-..- -i' -_•?-�.�l� `-• - N.- - h-"-.. - - r(1 , y i - 4?' - a `�; �F` -L ;'•- • Z �w.�f4"� � - • ��_ •J/:"/ 5 J�, - F ter 4 \\ i.„ -.�^x"'��`_L• : ,- .. �,i rt,`_ ft;F :i -.r•c.<a, j,.'s. , 1 .-\\ -c-=- \ E�T 4 �// 'p+Yrr \. y .,ra i f _ Y / ti :://I/i ` \� L Y cl �t1 y4 �1 Sr i f` "� ` :` :! - • - _ / .. \`_ ;- , `rcr y "'r- 1 oa: r -._- 'i7r ;'F -r- F;_.1:� _ A•' / /l-- ; y� l \` : � :f 7,-,�:-I- ,tt4{ ..4 1''�"y r'.t -- 1 T'' t _ l°' --' {- f >'1+Y L..2 - •=t4 1`.. r r'`�`,� ti .L.-. R v t.3 � r� gs,; `i'i. 1 tom,. T`. <^' 4 l } .. .`T •c,<� � ' ? - _ ---lam•i}R'43 •F" n {` ;1 ,rX_k „'` L�s .. T x,. . 1, 1 te„, ` µ f ': \ .i 34.,� ,tA., 3 v;rJ' ,1 __.c?'7t 4'' `� (T� k f r ...t a wc. �• y 3n� h -• jC w K , . ft .s `jF, '- ,1``\;.�t� _ "yx� ., l _P '�'1 lk{- �r-et 1 '.s_.`a �y r•-'�'"�-c,r •S.__.! -r %- . � yt • 3„ 'L '„ t -ass"- � :. u' .i r1 A-�' Jc•'^S 4 _ rr _ __t �.- +fs, �, � 1 �?�. Ea -r. r �. r r j .. � —R. `e .w.7 v � �, z1. : .i „C(�-'T ts .y/ y _r,� ? ./ ?;FT/ '! f _ ,-.-.: • f Y u.1fr; Y') 3a '�-' tt,,, .) • LS-11,-• .-. i�'. / L 1_.� ��.� �� -.\. .. e _ T ti 1tc��S'. '�1,'�5 sr r t•+^iy - t.. +.�; ti i/ V �. 9- c, i, -t .ia.c "'` 'lT'- :.J^,•�.{ ` .Y"}+- '.c �- ->>s,� wti fa'- _ „'" / tJ . �d.� '. ... `_ 7 `R `` ir\mot M Ys� j '.4-ti � 1 ;,C i r - _2` I / �° ^� C. �. lL..)�-: --..-. 7%`•:�,,.1.T, f=_^5���}1-\ ��"x:-r` ae...i '/ `,tom • - •'�w �+...r: .- ` t ,\�Y • • � .-.«• �-�xa � - �/ S,� � F�r t � �, i � ;T:`c"-"Ss°�t*`. ..„_ p{� ^ 66 j. _ ,1 lS� � y„ f. l �• � ly7•` i`'•b �sr Y 1. 1' ,-?- `fT - , %r + ,c-' "' �` r " . -: , c , _, ' t �t ,... a- "`,<r �` —,� \ ' • . POND 0 ' f. t. E .•� - - •- - u. -�' ? dt _ • . s-- ::_.c ',vim - �kw'„-,-.--•" 3 '.'r _"�- '•e`� . .;_ .--.--;,-...-,A l Sf+ ,.r -i''e2 S r • • - yiLd>_c F t'r 4-. elf^Y .ntia 7 - i Y r 3`t .., _c •'k :wa: ? ,,�ma's . -T > '`..'"l. T z : "" - ,::.; x ;} �1 a ,Lj..'t� 4•%7 • Tom- '^,.^ :,. y - .i.a •z( _ 'p- #' � "Y r _• � ` � �z.C` P .' ce MS i'<.` ? ram >r 'r"-Wj lc Y`--mac-�.L' J - F _t S, t yZ -r • • Sole : 1 �_ 10O •^-st• v=r_c,r--•. ..=_.�c•n.. Cza...a_._:zm-s�-r.�,.-.,�.c. _—_. -_ A1-T L--A 1 .c C Cr."( t,vE i L el D S E 1y '1 NCE Mc.r`-'I t 7 S t,cel- 5 c f 1'1 }` .; 4 ' • EXISTING DIKE • t 1 D ; w j a1 a a " MARSH CELL c o (-- 2 ---- U U NJ " Q y- G 1 Z Luc' Lu w MARSH CELL c=nj ,n 2 ' liI Z 2 �_ . 1 0 J W ESJ3 CD o d MARSH CELL I'4. U . . i NI J • . ill , 1P H . EXISTING ROAD 0 cr O' to Oj ,b=„I to N N C 0 0 r U EXISTING DIKE (- 2 LD �\ J - 2 w e D a r cr CO 2 1 FOND 0 C7 J o 5 W 3 w Cn T J 11 2 2 � {- / EXISTING ROAD O to p .b=„I fV N N N N N N N 0 • U1 1"r 4' O U1 O • O I LI13M 102j1N00 0 N 1130 HSLIVIN J I I r ,______.__.— 813M 1021N00 r I & I n IL' X ;� II —I V J Ip G) m 1 E 0 ca —i 0 r z izq c tv ONOd G 0 i v+ al1 Z. ;c) 4 • .D 73 Z o r‘ m m nt Z --I 1 a13M 101N00 CL r m 1332i1S H12i0N OOZE e -h 41 41 ry NO N_ N N) Cn I"_4. O aO II 1 1 I 17.= . a 1. 1 0 i 1 i I I I ' I � 3 3 ONOd d i I I I P 1CO u, I"ri Q --I \ _I CDi X r z + z ,/ 2 G 0 a�� ) 0 I / ) n I Z Y Z t� (` 1 N GNOd m il rn Zl a I 1 0 a D \ di o .:. . s rt 1 ?b1S H1LON OOZZ 0 +, A 0 N N N I"_ 4' O Cn O 1 ! I 3Q S 3 13NNCH0 m • 1 ( �3NNt1H0 ,'•' ti rn o r _ m 0 z z CTl z � rn m _) C) a m a fi 133a1S HIeON OOZZ 0 N N N 0 0 rn ri) � X -i n I � r o r O m 2 D ' 1 rn 11t� rn n 0 1' 5....�` rtgj arg0i;1 I. . I PALMER DEPAULIS y _t{.ie,ecFi c Clrrinlrlti.l;. MAYOR t3FFICE-b aii'(A ►YOR;:. r' i33 4.SO1:ti STA7t STREET;;.:; �• s FIFT,HiELOOR, SUITE.5O0.'..�t S1L , iKE'at3at0 8 January 24, 1989 Willie Stoler, Chairperson, and Members of the Salt Lake City Council 324 South State Street, Room 300 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Willie: I am transmitting herewith recommendations for board appointments which I would appreciate the Council to advise and consent upon: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Dan Bethel to be appointed to fill an unexpired term extending through July 1, 1991. HOUSING ADVISORY AND APPEALS BOARD Karen Wikstrom to be appointed to fill an expired term extending through October 14, 1990. SALT LAKE ARTS COUNCIL Myron Richardson to be reappointed to a term extending through October, 1991. MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT Frank C. Jackson to be reappointed to a term extending through December 31, 1990. SALT LAKE ARTS DESIGN BOARD Bonnie Sucec to be appointed to fill an unexpired term extending through March 8, 1990. Salt Lake City Council Page 2 January 25, 1989 I would appreciate your consideration of these appointments and ask that they be placed on the Council ' s agenda at the earliest opportunity. If I can provide you with any further information, please don't hesitate to call . Sincerely, Mayor PD/jf Enc. ROGER F. CUTLER SALT+If KE. VI i (CORPOR FION1 ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS RAY TGOMERY CITY ATTORNEY LAW DEPARTMENT GREG R. HAWKINS CHERYL D. LUKE LARRY V. SPENDLCVE CITY PROSECUTOR 324 SOUTH STATE, FIFTH FLOOR STEVEN W. ALLRED SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 BRUCE R. BAIRD (801) 535.7788 FRANK M. NAKAMURA FAX (801) 535-7640 ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS f� DONALD L. GEORGE C= December 8 1988 CELIA M. ES?ENOZA RICHARD G. HAMP GLEN A. COOK Memorandum To: Tom Godfrey City Council From: Larry V. Spendlove Assistant City Attorney Re: Ordinance Amendments Pertaining to Class A Retail Licenses in Hotels Pursuant to a petition filed by Attorney Kirk Heaton, I have drafted a proposed ordinance amending Sections 6 .04.040, 6 .08.040 and 6.08.110, Salt Lake City Code, to allow for the sale of beer in original containers from dispensing points within hotel rooms under Class A Retail Beer Licenses. The ordinance is in a form ready for presentation to the City Council for its consideration. You should be aware that Detective Greg Smith of the City Police Special Investigation Division has expressed concern about this proposed ordinance. It is my understanding that he feels it will create additional problems in making beer more accessible to persons under 21 years of age and will make enforcement efforts more difficult. Our office takes no position in this regard. 4/E- LVS:rc • • CALLISTER, DUNCAN & NEBEKER •r•OreSsloN•L CORrof•TION LOUTS N,CALLISTER ANDREW C.N[55' Or COUNSEL ADAM M.DUNCAN ROBERT N.WILKINSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW EARL P.STATEN RICNARD N.NEBEKER R.KIRK�EATON. R.Our,TM OPPSON GIrrORD W.PRICE T.RICNARD DAVIS SUITE 800 KENNECOTT BUILDING GARY R.NOW( SCOTT A.CALL SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84133 LOVIS N.CALLISTER.SR. w.CLARK BURT DAPON L COOPBS L.S.P'CVLLOUGN,JR. JONN P.PVLLEN TELEPHONE BOI•530.7300 I19OA.I98al FREO W.rINLINSON STEVEN R.ELLINW000 TELECOPIER 801•36n-9127 DOROTHY C.vLESPE L DOUGLAS CLARK JOHN A.BECKSTEADI PAUL R.INCE' TO CALL WRITER DIRECT JEF.REY N.CLAYTON DAVID W.SCOFIELD JAPES R.POLBROOK BRIAN W.BURNETT STEVEN L INGLEBY ANDRES DIAZ CNARLES P.BENNETT. LYNDA COCK w_wALOAN LLOYD JONN N.REES October 28 , 1988 N.RUSSELL NETTINGER MARK N.EGAN ROBERT S.PRINCE P.BRYAN FISNBURN JEFrRET L SNIELDS RICNARD L.KING STEVEN E.TYLER JAN B.HOWARD RANDALL C.BENSON MARK D.PALMER RICNARD K.NEBEKER DAVID R.WRIGNT R.WILLIS ORTON CAROLINE L.SKUZESKI RUSSELL C.PEARL MATTHEW G.COOPER GEORGE E.HARRIS,JR' n�, IA-SO KIZONA BAR .E•�;( I`/- 2.L90 NCPBCR CALIFORNIA BAR 'ALSO IN0.10A BAR .•L9O NCNBER NISSOURI BAR 'RCCIBTERCO P.*ENT ATTORNCT OC 13 1 190 ivIAYOR'S OFFICF Honorable Palmer DePaulis Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah 5th Floor 324 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Re : Amendment to Alcoholic Beverage Ordinances Dear Mayor DePaulis : I represent the Doubletree Hotel located at 215 West South Temple . The Doubletree Hotel has 381 guest rooms which serves a substantial segment of the tourist traffic in the Salt Lake City area . The Doubletree Hotel desires to offer an additional convenience to its guests in the form of a small refrigerator placed in each one of the 381 guest rooms . Each refrigerator will have a lock and separate key from the key which opens the door to the room. Upon checking into the Doubletree Hotel guests will be asked whether they would like access to the small refrigerator which contains soft drinks , juices , crackers , cheese and other food items , along with a few cans of lite beer. If the guest indicates that he would like access, he will be asked for appropriate verifiction of age and if satisfied , the Doubletree Hotel would provide him a key. Each day as the room is serviced , the small refrigerator will be checked and all items which have been removed will be charged to the guest . The purpose of this letter is to request your support for an amendment to title 6 , chapter 6 of the Salt Lake City Alcoholic Beverages Ordinances with respect to Class A beer licenses . The current Section 6 . 08 . 040 provides that a Class A beer license authorizes the sale of beer in original container "for consumption off the premises " . The situation of my client does not presently fit within the definition and language of a Class A permit . A Class B permit deals with restaurants and requires the sale of food along with 7(�S Honorable Palmer DePaulis October 28 , 1988 Page 2 each purchase of an alcoholic beverage . The Class B beer license would be inapplicable to our situation . A Class C beer license focuses on the tavern or cabaret context which is also inapplicable as explained below. Hence , no current beer license authorizes the contemplated practice of the Doubletree Hotel . The general rule of law is that while a hotel room is rented by a guest , the room is his property and under his complete control . My client respects that rule and feels that during the rental period the rented room is the "premises " of the person renting. The restrictions and concerns of a Class C license , i . e . , that no minors be allowed on or near the place of sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages , does not apply to the hotel context. The situation presented by my client is similar to a hotel guest going downstairs to the current beer dispensing point , purchasing the beer and taking it back up to his room. Additionally, the hotel guests could stop off at any number of convenience stores or grocery stores , obtain the beer and return to his room where minors may or may not be present . Because the hotel industry treats the room as the premises of the guest, I feel that the restrictions imposed on a Class C beer license should not apply in the hotel context. Doubletree Hotel believes that the convenience would be attractive to guests and beneficial to tourism in Salt Lake City and the state of Utah generally. The tavern type atmosphere would not be present and therefore the policy and concerns underlying restrictions on a Class C beer license should not apply . I feel it would be appropriate to amend and modify the Class A beer license restrictions to exempt hotels which provide in-room service of lite beers . Because the Doubletree Hotel ' s fact situation is unique and there appears to be no clear cut authorization for the selling of alcoholic beverages in the manner contemplated by my client , I , along with the ,City Attorney Larry Spendlove , feel that a modification or amendment to the ordnance is needed . I would appreciate your support in presenting !to the city council an amendment to ordinance Section 6 . 08 . 040 so that my client can begin furnishing this service and convenience to its guests . I would appreciate speaking with you or your designated representative about this issue and possible solutions through amendment of the ordinance . Sincerely, R. Kirk Heaton RKH/mcm cc : Roger Swaddish Manager , Doubletree Hotel Steve Tyler CDN4550h : _ D - ..,, 7.1„7,1 ": of„. . i 7 4::), :t1, A 2. SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE • No. of 1988 (An Ordinance Amending Sections 6.04.040, 6 .08 .040 and 6 .08 . 110 pertaining to Class A retail licenses in hotels) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 6 .04.040, 6.08.040 AND 6.08. 110, SALT LAKE CITY CODE, PERTAINING TO CLASS A RETAIL LICENSES IN HOTELS. WHEREAS, it has become customary in major hotels throughout the United States to provide a refrigerator or other dispenser in guests ' rooms with refreshments therein, including unopened original containers of beer. The consumption of said refreshments is at the option of the guest, with the hotel to be reimbursed by the guest for any refreshments so consumed; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes it is appropriate to - . - modify the definition of a Class A retail beer license under City ._ordinances to allow for the sale of beer in unopened original containers from dispensing points within hotel rooms for consumption by the hotel patrons provided appropriate precautions are taken to avoid consumption thereof by persons under twenty- one years of age. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, hereby adopts the following amendments to the Salt Lake City Code. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That Section 6 .04.040, Salt Lake City Code, be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows: 6.04.040 Licensed premises. "Licensed premises" means any room, house, building, structure or place occupied by any person licensed to sell beer or to allow the consumption of liquor on such premises under this title. Multiple beer or liquor dispensing facilities located in- one building and owned or leased by one licensed applicant shall be deemed to be only one licensed premises, provided that each dispensing point must be designated and the appropriate fee paid and the license prominently displayed at each dispensing point. Multiple beer dispensing facilities located in the separate rooms of one hotel owned or leased by one licensed applicant shall be deemed to be only one licensed premises, provided that each dispensing point is designated and the appropriate fee is paid . - and the license displayed in the lobby of such hotel. . _ - SECTION _2. . __That Section 6.08 .040, Salt Lake City - and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows: - 6.08.040 Class A licenses. A. A Class A retail license shall entitle the licensee to sell beer on the premises described in such license in original containers for consumption off the premises, in accordance with the Liquor Control Act of Utah and the Salt Lake City Code; provided, however, that it is unlawful for the licensee to sell or distribute beer in any container larger than a half-gallon. B. It is unlawful for a licensee of a Class A retail license at a hotel to sell beer in original containers from multiple beer dispensing facilities located in separate rooms of the hotel unless such dispensing facilities are securely locked -2- and access to the contents of such facilities is restricted by licensee to hotel patrons twenty-one years of age or older who have duly rented such hotel room in which such dispensing facility is located. "Consumption off the premises" under this section shall include consumption by hotel patrons twenty-one years of age or older of beer dispensed at a hotel room duly rented by such patrons. ____ ) SECTION 3 . That Section 6 .08.110, Salt Lake City Code, relating to fees for beer licenses be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows: 6.08.110 Fees. A. Applications provided for in this chapter shall be accompanied by the fees provided in this section, which fees - =shall be deposited in the city treasury if the license is - -- _ ._„ granted, -and returned to the applicant if denied _-� - --•---• 1. 2. * * 3 . * * 4. * * * 5 . * * * 6. * * * 7. For each additional dispensing point for beer at the same premises where an initial Class B or Class C retail license has been obtained, the fee shall be ninety dollars. For each additional dispensing point for beer at a hotel where an initial Class A retail license has been obtained, the fee shall be ten dollars. -3- SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 198 . CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s Action: Approved Vetoed. ATTEST: CITY RECORDER LVS:pp -4- x J • SALT'LAKES 01Yr ORP RATION OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL SUITE 300, CITY HALL 324 SOUTH STATE STREET SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 5 3 5.7600 MEMORANDUM To: City Council Date: February 17, 1989 From: Lee King Subject: Budget Opening Cam Caldwell • We have met with Steve Fawcett to review the budget opening proposal which is on Tuesday's agenda. As a staff we are comfortable with the Administration's explanation of these budget changes. At the same time, we wanted to provide you with an explanation for several of the individual items. Fleet Replacement This budget adjustment is to transfer funds from FY 1987-88 to the current fiscal year. Monies used will be to purchase three dump trucks for Public Works. The purchase was to have taken place at the beginning of the fiscal year, but did not occur at that time due to the changeover in personnel in Fleet Management. Revenues will come from Fleet fund balance and revenue from the sale of surplus vehicles. • Airport The Airport is requesting an additional $20.044 million for capital projects The Airport wants to move up the timing of construction for the CF Airfreight/Joint Cargo Building and the installations of the shared tenant telephone program. Monies are available for these projects through AIP Grant, Fund Balance, and other sources. License Enforcement Roger Evans wants to tighten enforcement of the licensing ordinance and hire two persons to work twenty hours per week. Spot checks of several businesses indicate that there are many licenses not being obtained, with substantial revenue being lost by the City. Roger estimates that the $13,782 spent will generate about $54,000 in new revenues. The status of these two employees will be assessed prior to the budget proposal next year. RDA Loans/Grants This is simply a reallocation of revolving loan funds. Miscellaneous Grant Carryovers This money involves the reappropriation of fund balance for federal grant programs and should have taken place earlier this year. Emergency Shelter Grant The $62,000 consists of $5,000 to the Housing Outreach Rental Program and $57,000 to the Homeless Shelter. Of the latter, $7,400 is for operations and $49,600 is for capital construction. Miscellaneous CDBG Adjustments The big item is the reprogramming of Westside Community Master Plan ($17,500) and Urban Design Element ($17,500) monies to the Comprehensive Downtown Parking Plan ($35,000). In addition, $971 in Capitol Hill Revolving Loan Fund money is also to be allocated to that parking plan. CBID The CBID has requested that $40,000 in fund balance be reallocated to continue funding for R/UDAT and to pay for a Christmas ad for next year. Canterbury Apartments Now that it has been determined that Salt Lake City Corporation will be the owner of the apartments, the City needs to transfer $1. 675 million from Miscellaneous Grants to the CIP fund. General Fund Contingency The current balance of the General Fund Contingency is $250,000. The $200,000 requested for transfer is to pay for the delivery of parking warrants. We will make a net profit by following up aggressively. More importantly, we will be communicating to the public that the City will be taking an aggressive posture to collect on parking warrants, even though the Court has changed its policy. The Administration has indicated that they will be coming back in later • in the year to request an additional $40,000 of Contingency for Parks water. Health Insurance Money was not budgeted to pay for the increase in premiums for retirees. The premium increase was administered but the budget did not reflect the change. Golf The Parks Department would like to transfer $9,000 from Parks Contingency to Golf to hire a new Superintendent to oversee construction of underground irrigation and drainage at the Airport Golf Course. They would like to hire the Superintendent by April. In addition, they would like to appropriate $33,000 from the sale of land earlier this year to buy fifteen new golf carts for Bonneville and Mountain Dell. Glendale Youth Facility A total of $108,000 from the sale of Parks property located east of the Parks Building is requested to be reallocated to purchase two parcels of land adjacent to the Glendale Youth Facility (PAL). The land will be used for parking and landscaping. An additional parcel will be purchased at a later date for construction of a ball diamond. Juvenile Justice The City received a $20,094 federal grant to fund a juvenile program. The request is to transfer this revenue from Intergovernmental to Police Overtime. Police Auxiliary Unit/DARE Program The Police Department had indicated in its policy meeting presentation to the Council that it intended to get an early start on the Police Auxiliary and DARE programs. The money comes from federal drug money which have already been given to the City, but which are earmarked in how they can be spent. RDA Projects A total of $60,000 is requested to transfer to CIP from RDA Tax Increment Funds to finance engineering related costs for the CBD Beautification, State Street Storm Drain, and Main Street Storm Drain. Local Streets It is proposed that Local Streets-SID and CIP Slippage be reprogrammed and appropriated to the Local Streets CIP fund out of 46 prior year CIP projects. Staff will be available Tuesday night to answer any Council questions. SALE'. Mt CORM 'IIOI 1 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 324 SOUTH STATE STREET, 5TH FLOOR LANCE R. BATEMAN, CPA SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 PALMER DEPAULIS DIRECTOR OF FINANCE MAYOR (801) 535-7676 February 8, 1989 TO: Salt Lake City Council RE: February 21, 1989, Public Hearing and Pursuant to Action on Formal Budget Amendment No. 3 Fiscal Year 1988-89 TRANSMITTAL: Transmitted herewith are: 1 . The resolution amending budgets of Salt Lake City Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989 . 2. The budget amending package, which includes a summary fact sheet and applicable budget schedules. DISCUSSION: On February 21, 1989, a Public Hearing will be held on the requested budget amendment at which time departmental representatives and members of the budget staff will be available for questions and comment. Salt Lake City Council February 8, 1989 Page - 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: The budget staff recommends: All items in the amendment package be approved Tuesday, February 21, 1989 . Respectfully submitted, ce R. Bateman Director of Finance LRB/hd Enclosures SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. OF 1989 (Amending the Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 39 OF 1988 ADOPTING THE BUDGET OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1988 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1989 . PREAMBLE On June 13, 1988, the Salt Lake City Council ( the "City Council" ) adopted the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989, in accordance with the requirements of Section 118 of Chapter 6, Title 10, Utah Code Annotated, 1953 as amended; and said budget was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah. The Director of Finance, acting as the City' s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. The City Council fixed a time and place for a public hearing to be held on February 21, 1989 to consider the attached proposed amendments to the budget and ordered notice thereof be published as required by law. Notice of said public hearing to consider the amendments to said budget was duly published and a public hearing to consider the attached amendments to said budget was held on February 21, 1989 in accordance with said notice at which hearing all interested parties for and against the budget amendment proposals were heard and all comments were duly considered by the City Council. All conditions precedent to amend said budget have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah as adopted by Salt Lake City Ordinance 39 of 1988. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989, in accordance with requirements of Section 128 of Chapter 6, Title 10, Utah Code Annotated ( 1953, as amended) . SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The Director of the City' s Finance Department, acting as the City' s Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments with the Utah State Auditor. SECTION 4. Filing of Copies of the Budget Amendments . The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder, which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989 . SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Approved by the Mayor this day of , 1989. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER FMN:cc APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attomey's Office Date 1-9- 9 By -3- 1969 Budget Amendment 03 February 21, 1989 page 1 of 4 I MAJOR FUND CLASSIFICATIONS I INTERNAL CAPITAL SPECIAL EXPLANATION AGENCY/ GENERAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE IMPROVEMENT GRANT REVENUE OTHER PROJECT OR DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUND CLASS TOTALS AMENDMENT REQUEST Administrative Services 187,259 Fleet Department Request: To budget funds to cover the Replacement purchase of three dump trucks. Discussion: Due to time delays brought about from management Changes at fleet last fiscal year, they were unable to process a purchase order for three dump trucks budgeted for, although, revenue was received from the General Fund. The purchase orders have been written in the current fiscal year but they do not have a current budget to cover the expenditure. Recommendation: Appropriate $157,259 of fleet fund balance and S30,000 of anticipated additional sales of surplus vehicles to fund the purchase of three dump trucks. 187,259 Airport 20,044,100 Airport CIP Department Request: To budget funds to complete Capital Improvement Projects. Discussion: This request will allow the Airport to take advantage of a good bidding climate during the winter months so construction can begin in April and use the full constructionppppPF season. Contributions andA512.939,600Sof1 Fund Balance P too the. complete capital Improvements. 20,044,100 Community and Economic Dev. 13,762 License Department Request: To increase business license Enforcement revenue for anticipated increased collections and appropriate funds to hire 2.00 part-time FIE's to conduct a survey of city regulatory licenses. Discussion: This request is based on the assumption that there is • direct correlation between enforce- ment and revenue collection. Two additional staff will allow • survey to be conducted of all regula- tory licenses to analyze what the license was Issued for verses what the business actually has on it's premises. Estimated revenue is $34,596. Recommendation: Appropriate 613,782 of license fee revenue and a like amount in part-time base to add 2.00 part-time staff to complete the survey. t09,n35 RDA Loans/Grants Department Request: To budget program income funds generated additional loansand grants . Redevelopment to be used for Discussion: These funds are generated from loan repayments. Recommendation: Appropriate S109 835 of CDBG program Income to the CDBG operating fund for the RDA loans and grants program. 848,262 Miscellaneous Department Request: To budget carryover funds of Grant Carryovers several grants. Discussion: Homeless Mentally Ill Grant (52191. Ti. District fleeting/Cooling Study (572,275(. The Rick warner Ford UDAG (5237.5661. The Rental Rehab. 87/88 and 88/69 Grants (3243,200 and $295,0001. Recommendation: Appropriate the total of 5848,262 of grant fund balance. 62,000 ESC-Shelter Department Request: To budget Federal funds for the emergency shelter for the homeless. Discussion: This request Is a new allocation of Federal Mckinney Act funds for the homeless. Recommendation: Appropriate $62,000 and create new project. page 2 of 4 MAJOR FUND CLASSIFICATIONS 1 INTERNAL CAPITAL SPECIAL EXPLANATION AGENCY/ GENERAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE IMPROVEMENT GRANT REVENUE OTHER PROJECT OR DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUND CLASS TOTALS AMENDMENT REQUEST Community and Economic Dev. 971 Misc. CDBG Department Request: To budget program income funds (cont'd) Adjustments generated back to the Capitol Hill Revolving loan fund and reprogram funds of two projects to create two new projects. Discussion: Program income funds received from loan repayments (S971). Reprogram Westside Community Master Plan (S17,500) and Urban Design Element ($17,500) to the Comprehensive Downtown Parking Plan (S35,000). The reprogrammed projects will be completed when it becomes more feasible. Recommendation: Appropriate 5971 to Capitol Hill Revolving Loan fund and $35,000 to Parking Plan. 40,000 C.B.I.D. Department Request: To budget C.B.I.D. fund balance for special projects. Discussion: In order to continue funding for the R/UDAT project and create a Christmas ad for next season the CHID board has requested that these funds be allocated. Recommendation: Appropriate $40,000 of the C.B O. fund balance to be used to complete these proj� 1,675,000 -1,675,000 Canterbury Apts Department Request: Transfer appropriation from the Miscellaneous Grants fund to the Capital Improvement fund. Discussion: When funds were appropriated for this project a determination was not made as to which agency would show ownership of the Apartments, therefore the funds were not placed in CIP. Now that is has been determined that Salt Lake City Corp will be the owner it is appropriate to transfer the appropriation to the CIP fund. Recommendation: Transfer the appropriation from the Miscellaneous Grant fund to the CIP fund. 1,074,850 Finance 200,000 Department Request: TO transfer and budget General fund contingency to cover the cost of constable service delivery of parking related warrants„ Discussion: The budget for delivery of parking warrants by the constable's office was originally lower because of court rules relating to service of warrants within a 45 day period of the court date. The court changed their ruling and we now serve all warrants as soon as possible because it is in the best interest of the City to collect on as many as possible. Also, the number of delinquent tickets has increased. Therefore, there is not enough budget to cover the cost of this added service, so an increase is needed. The treasurer's office is projecting that by the end of this year we could be spending an average of S22,000 per month. Recommendation: Appropriate $200,000 of General fund contingency to cover the cost of services through June. 200,000 Human Resources 1,018,000 Health Insurance Department Request: To budget both revenue and expenditure appropriations of the health insurance fund. Discussion: When the budget was prepared by Risk in February estimated increases in premiums were budgeted for in the departments but the amount for retirees was underestimated in the Risk fund budget. Revenue is being received and premiums are being paid but an appropriation is needed to avoid going in the red budgetarily. Recommendation; Appropriate S1,018,000 of Premium revenue and expenditures in the Risk fund. 1,018,000 page 3 of 9 MAJOR FUND CLASSIFICATIONS 1 INTERNAL CAPITAL SPECIAL EXPLANATION AGENCY/ GENERAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE IMPROVEMENT GRANT REVENUE OTHER PROJECT OR DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUND CLASS TOTALS AMENDMENT REQUEST Parks 0 Golf Department Request: To increase the Golf fund staffing document by 1.00 Golf Course Supt. Discussion: It is necessary to hire the new Golf Superintendent position while construction is going on at the course they will work at so they can gain an understanding of the course layout as it is built, such as underground irrigation lines, drain- age system, etc. Recommendation: Transfer S9,000 of Golf contingency and increase the staffing document by 1.00 FTE. 33,000 Golf Department Request: Increase revenue appropriation from land sale and appropriate to capital outlay to purchase additional golf carts. Discussion: Land sold adjacent to Bonneville Golf Course generated S33,000 In revenue. In a review of golf cart usage, it was determined that both Bonneville and Mountain Dell had additional need for more carts. It is prudent to add these to the fleet at this time to allow for timely purchase and use during the golf season. Recommendation: Appropriate S33.000 of revenue f land sales and appropriate 533.000 to capital outl., to purchase golf carts. 108,000 Glendale Youth Department Request: To budget proceeds from land Facility sales to purchase land adjacent to the Glendale Youth facility (PAL). Discussion: Proceeds from a parcel of land sold east of the Parks administration building was deposited in the City surplus property account in CIP and it is now requested to allocate these funds to the Glendale Youth facility (PAL), in order to purchase two parcels of land adjacent thereto. Recommendation: Appropriate S108,000 of surplus property account funds for the purchase of land at the Glendale Youth facility. 141,000 Police 20,094 Juvenile Justice Department Request: To budget funds received from Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention. Discussion: This funding is to provide reimburse- ment of police officer overtime costs for a three month period. This proactive program is designed to intercede in juvenile endangering situations and juvenile crime. Recommendation: Appropriate S20,094 of intergovern- mental revenue and $20,O94 to police overtime. 56,571 Police Auxilliary Department Request: To budget S56,571 of revenue Unit/D.A.R.E. received from the U.S. Attorney's office for the Program Police Department's share of forfeited seizure mor and appropriate the funds to cover start-up costs the Police Auxilliary Unit and the D.A.R.E. progr, and associated capital outlay. Discussion: Both of these programs are include in the Departments major goals statement presented to the City Council in January, 1989. Start-up costs for these programs are approximately S27,000. The additional amount of $29,500 is needed for capital needs of the department. There are additional on- going costs oS7,1us per year for the Auxilliary Unit and ts6f0 p possibly a transfer of duties for five department personnel or a new hire of the same for the D.A.R.E. program. Recommendation: Appropriate S56,571 of one-time forfeited seizure money and appropriate S29,546 for capital outlay purchases, appropriate S27,025 for start-up costs of the D.A.R.E. and Police Auxilliary Unit programs. 76,665 page 4 of 4 1 MAJOR FUND CLASSIFICATIONS I INTERNAL CAPITAL SPECIAL EXPLANATION AGENCY/ GENERAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE IMPROVEMENT GRANT REVENUE OTHER PROJECT OR DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUND CLASS TOTALS AMENDMENT REQUEST Public Works 60,000 RDA Projects Department Request: To budget S60.000 of RDA Tax Increment funds to the CIP fund. Discussion: CBD Beautification (S20,000). State Street Storm Drain (S20,000) and Main Street Storm Drain (S20,000) projects. Redevelopment Agency funds will be used for engineering fees, survey's and sub- surface investigations. Recommendation: Appropriate S20,000 to each project and create three new projects in the CIP fund. 255,953 Local Streets Department Request: Reprogram and appropriate close-out funds from 46 prior year CIP projects to Local Streets-SID and CIP Slippage. Discussion: Finance has closed 46 prior CIP projects which have been completed. These funds are available for approriation to other projects. Recommendation: Appropriate S157,000 of CIP fund balance to the Local Streets-SID project and S98,953 to CIP General fund slippge. 315,953 Contingency -200,000 Discussion: Corresponding reduction in contingency fund for increase in Finance. -200,000 Total Requests 90,447 20,077,100 1,205,259 2,098,953 -653,932 40,000 0 22,857,827 GENERAL FUND AMENDED BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1988-89 1988-89 1988-89 COUNCIL AMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET RESOURCES Revenue Taxes: Property Taxes S24.741.909 SO $24.741.909 Sales i Use Taxes 19.688.000 0 19.688.000 Franchise Taxes 15.389.560 0 15.389.560 Total Taxes 59,819.469 0 59.819.469 Other Current Revenue: Licenses & Permits 4.335.282 13,782 4.349,064 Fines & Forfeitures 3,313,060 0 3,313,060 Interest 2,486,500 0 2,486,500 Charges For Services 1.835.395 0 1.835.395 Federal Revenue Sharing 0 0 0 State Beer/Liquor Tax 480,000 0 480.000 Intergovernmental Revenue 2,249,011 76,665 2.325.676 Parking Meter Collections 1,300.000 0 1.300,000 Interfund Reimbursement 3,496,655 0 3,496.655 Other Revenue 251,285 0 251.285 Total Other Current Revenue 19,747,188 90.447 19.837.635 Other Sources Bond Reserves 424,240 0 424.240 Transfer In From Other Funds 0 0 0 Fund Balance (Reserves) 0 0 0 Total Other Sources 424.240 0 424.240 TOTAL RESOURCES S79,990.897 $90.447 880.081.344 USES Expenditures Administrative Services S2,995,747 $0 82.995.747 Attorney 1.121.503. 0 1.121.503 City Council 563.628 0 563.628 Community and Economic Dev. 3.256.433 13.782 3.270,215 Finance 3,886,546 200.000 4.086,546 Fire 15.966.089 0 15.966.089 Mayor 1.878.298 0 1.878,298 Non Departmental 3.794.258 -200,000 3.594.258 Parks 5,300,794 0 5,300,794 Police 20.423.202 76,665 20.499.867 Public Works 14.010.341 0 14.010.341 Total Expenditures 73.196.839 90.447 73.287.286 Other Uses Interfund Transfers: Street Lighting Fund 102.668 0 102,668 Capital Projects Fund 4.462.890 0 4.462.890 Refuse Collection Fund 289.000 0 289.000 Fleet Replacement Fund 1.909.500 0 1,909.500 Demolition Fund 15.000 0 15,000 Weed Abatement Fund 15,000 0 15.000 Approp. To Fund Balance Total Other Uses 6.794,058 0 6,794.058 TOTAL USES $79,990,897 S90.447 $80.081.344 AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1988-89 CAAP BUDGETARY BASIS BASIS 1988-89 1988-89 1988-89 COUNCIL AMENDED AMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET BUDGET OPERATING REVENUE$: Landing Fees $5.841.900 $0 $5,841,900 $5,841,900 Terminal Rentals 11.417,700 0 11,417.700 11,417.700 Automobile Rentals 3.131.300 0 3,131.300 3,131,300 Automobile Parking 4.265.000 0 4,265.000 4,265.000 Aviation Fuel Tax 4.549,800 0 4,549.800 4,549,800 Terminal Concession Fees 2,327,300 0 2.327,300 2.327,300 Flight Kitchens 1,713.500 0 1,713,500 1.713.500 Other Revenue 4.852,800 .0 4,852,800 4.852.800 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 38.099.300 0 38.099.300 38.099.300 OPERATING EXPENSES: Personal Services 7,388,800 0 7,388.800 7,388,800 Material and Supply 1,269.700 0 1,269.700 1,269,700 Travel and Training 68,500 0 68,500 68,500 Utilities 2.249.400 0 2,249.400 2.249,400 Contractual Services 381,700 0 381.700 381,700 Airline Rebate 2.190.000 C 2,190.000 2,190,000 Janitorial Services 1,060,000 0 1,060.000 1.060,000 Interfund Charges 2,356,200 0 2,356,200 2,356,200 Other Charges and Services 1.026.300 0 1,026.300 1,026,300 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 17,990,600 0 17.990,600 17,990.600 NET OPERATING INCOME 20.108.700 0 20,108,700 20,108,700 OTHER SOURCES (USES): Interest Income (Expense) 800,000 0 800,000 800.000 AIP/Other Contributions" 11.729,000 7,104,500 18.833.500 : Contributon-Restricted .Fund -300,000 0 300..000 ' Depreciation 0 0 0 9,217,100 Capital Outlay -1,314.600 . 0 -1.314,600 Debt Service: Interest -5,088,700 0 -5.088.700 -5.088.700 Debt Service: Principal -2.835,000 0 -2.835.000 Capital Improvements -21.427,900 -20,044,100 -41,472.000 TOTAL OTHER SOURCES (USES) -18,437,200 -12.939.600 -31,376,800 -13.505.800 Appropriation to Fund Balance 1,671,500 -1.671.500 0 Appropriation of Fund Balance -11,268.100 -11,268,100 Change in Retained Earnings $6,602,900 Beginning Fund Balance (Deficit) 6.781.100 6,781.100 Ending Fund Balance (Deficit) $8.452,600 $0 ($4.487.000) Note: Fund balance is defined as cash and investments, less accounts payable, accrued payroll, contract retainage, and restricted accounts. GOLF COURSE ENTERPRISE FUND AMENDED BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1988-89 GAAP BUDGETARY BASIS BASIS 1988-89 1988-89 1988-89 COUNCIL AMENDED ADOPTED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET BUDGET OPERATING REVENUES: Green Fees $1.930,987 $0 $1,930,987 $1,930,987 concessions/Rentals 572,404 0 572.404 572,404 Season Passes 225,000 0 225.000 225.000 Driving Range Fees 162,103 0 162,103 162,103 Other Revenue 0 0 0 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 2,890,494 0 2,890,494 2.890,494 OPERATING EXPENSES: Personal Services 831,563 0 831.563 831.563 Compensated Absence Allowance 0 0 0 19.000 Materials 4 Supplies 326,234 0 326.234 326,234 Golf Pro Fees 486,715 0 486.715 486.715 Fleet Maintenance Services 59,825 0 59,825 59,825 Utilities 353,595 0 353.595 353.595 Insurance. Worker's Comp, & Unemployment Premiums 8,836 0 8,836 8,836 Administrative Fees to C.F. 69.000 0 69.000 69.000 ' Other Charges & Services 144.497 0 144.497 144.497 Depreciation 0 0 0 180.000 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 2.280,265 0 2.280.265 2,479.265 NET OPERATING INCOME 610,229 0 610,229 411,229 OTHER SOURCES (USES) Interest Income (Expense) 30,000.- 0 30,000 30,000 Airport Contribution. 850.000 0 850.000 Bond Proceeds 0 0. . FE.MA Reimbursement - .0 0 - .0. Capital Outlay 300,.750 -33,000 33$ 750 Contingencies -81.000 0 -81,000" Capital Improvements -1.350.000 0 -1.350,000 Sale of Real Property 33.000 33.000 TOTAL OTHER SOURCES (USES) -851.750 0 -851,750 30.000 Appropriation to Fund Balance 258.479 0 258.479 Appropriation of Fund Balance -1.000,000 0 -1.000,000 Change in Retained Earnings $441,229 Beginning Fund Balance (Deficit) 1,235,373 0 1,235,373 Ending Fund Balance (Deficit) $493,852 $O $493,852 Note: Fund Balance is defined as cash and investments. less accounts payable and accrued payroll. FLEET MANAGEMENT INTERNAL SERVICE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1988-89 GAAP BUDGETARY BASIS BASIS 1988-89 1988-89 1988-89 COUNCIL AMENDED AMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET BUDGET OPERATING REVENUES: Charges for Services S4,883.030 SO $4.883.030 $4.883.030 Other Revenues 0 0 0 0 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 4.883,030 0 4,883.030 4.883,030 OPERATING EXPENSE: Personal Services 1,903.546 0 1.903,546 1.903,546 Compensated Absence Allowance 0 0 0 5.000 Materials & Supplies 2.122,271 0 2.122,271 2.122.271 Data Processing Services 55.945 0 55.945 55.945 Utilities 106,872 0 - 106.872 106,872 Towing 31.225 0 31.225 31.225 Contractual Services 85,000 0 ' 85,000 85,000 Insurance, Worker's Comp, And 0 Unemployment'Premiums 142.133 0 142.133 142.133 Administrative Fees to G.F. 224.000 0 224.000 224.000 Other Charges & Services 138.601 0 138.601 138.601 Contingencies 23,539 0 23,539 23,539 Non-Vehicle Depreciation 0 0 0 25,000 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 4,833,132 0 4,833,132 4.863.132 NET OPERATING INCOME 49,898 0 49,898 19.898 • OTHER SOURCES (USES): Charges For Replacement 1.935.000 0 1.935,000 1.935.000 Interest Income (Expense) 10,102 0 10,102 10,102 Sale Of Vehicles 400.000 30.000 430.000 Vehicle Depreciation 0 0 0 -1.775.000 Debt Service-Principal 0 0 0 Debt Service-Interest 0 0 0 Capital Outlay-Maintenance -60,000 0 -60,000- Capital Outlay-Vehicles -2,885,000 -187.259 -3.072,259 Prior Period Obligations 0 0 0 Transfers to Other Funds 400.000 0 400,000 Transfers To General Fund -400,000 0 -400,000 TOTAL OTHER SOURCES (USES) -599,898 -157.259 -757,157 170,102 Appropriation of Fund Balance -1.473.308 -157.259 -1,630.567 Change in Retained Earnings $190.000 Beginning Fund Balance (Deficit) 1.630.589 1,630,589 Ending Fund Balance (Deficit) $157.281 $0 $22 Note: Fund Balance is defined as cash and investments less accounts payable and accrued payroll. RISK MANAGEMENT INTERNAL SERVICE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1988-89 GAAP BUDGETARY BASIS Basis 1988-89 1988-89 1988-89 COUNCIL ADOPTED ADOPTED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET BUDGET OPERATING REVENUES: Premiums S7.419,840 S1.018.000 $8,437,840 $8,437,840 OPERATING EXPENSES: Personal Services 187.940 0 187,940 187.940 Compensated Absence Allowance 0 0 0 2.000 • Materials 4 Supplies 7,044 0 7,044 7,044 Data Processing Services 25,024 0 25.024 25.024 Contractual Services 115,500 0 115,500 115.500 Claims 1,601,539 0 1,601,539 1.601.539 Premiums 4,932,971 1,018.000 5.950,971 5.950.971 Administrative Fees 25,000 0 25.000 25.000 Administrative Fees to C.F. 71,400 0 71.400 71.400 Other Charges i Services 376,204 0 376.204 376.204 Depreciation 0 0 0 5,000 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 7,342,622 1,018,000 8,360.622 8.367.622 NET OPERATING INCOME 77.218 0 77,218 70.218 OTHER SOURCES (USES): Interest Income (Expense) 71,192 0 71,192 71,192 Capital Outlay -8,410 0 -8.410 Transfer In 0 C 0 0 Transfer Out 0 0 0 Refunds 0 0 0 TOTAL OTHER SOURCES (USES) 62.782 0 62,782 71.192 Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 0 Appropriation to Fund Balance 140,000 0 140,000 Change in Retained Earnings 0 0 0 $141,410 Beginning Fund Balance (Deficit) -1.591.294 -1,591.294 Ending Fund Balance (Deficit) (S1,451,294) SO (S1.451.294) Note: Fund balance is defined as cash and investments, less accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and deferred revenue. CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1988-89 1988-R9 1988-89 COUNCIL AMENDED REVENUES BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET Community Development Block Grant ( CDBG) S1.695,600 1,695,600 Federal Agency Loan Proceeds 150,000 150,000 UDOT and Federal Highway Admin. 1,218,295 1,218,295 Salt Lake County 1,100,000 1,100,000 Misc. Private/InterAgency/Federal Grants 966,000 966,000 Transfer in from General Fund 4,462,890 4,462,890 Redevelopment Agency 1.660,000 60,000 1,720,000 Fund Balance (Surplus Property Account) 800,000 108,000 908,000 Prior Year Closeouts 255,953 255,953 Special Assessment Taxes 1.000,000 1,000,000 Central Fire Dispatch 50,000 50,000 H.U.D. Section 108 Loan 1,675,000 1,675,000 TOTAL RESOURCES S13,102,785 S2.098,953 S15,201,738 PROJECT EXPENDITURES PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Street Improvements Sidewalk, Curb 8. Gutter: SID 820,000 820,000 Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Emergency Repairs 200,000 200,000 Local Street SID 165.000 157,000 322,000 California Avenue 57,795 57,795 900 W. 900-2100 S. 1,300,000 1.300.000 Railroad Safety Project 250,000 250,000 400 S. Viaduct Emerg. Repair 1,850.000 1.850,000 Traffic Safety Mgmt. 100,000 - 100,000 900 West Folsom Ave.-100 S. 600,000 600,000 CBD Beautification 1.500.000 20,000 1,520,000 Main Street Bus Bays 220,000 220,000 Windsor-Dooley Blk. Redesign 150,000 150,000 Peoples Freeway St. Imp. 300,000 300,000 E. Central St. Imp. 525,000 525.000 E. Central St. Design 25,000 25,000 W. Capital St. Design 20,000 20,000 N. Temple Parking Lot 135.000 135.000 Safer Sidewalks 10,500 10,500 Total Street Improvements 8,228,295 177,000 8,405,295 Drainage Improvements Avenues Cross Drain 30,000 30,000 N. E. Central Design 10,000 10,000 W. Temple Storm Drain 575,000 575,000 Main Street Storm Drain 20,000 20,000 State Street Storm Drain 20,000 20,000 Total Drainage Improvements 615,000 40,000 655,000 Public Buildings and Other Facilities City-County Landfill 1,100,000 1,100,000 Misc. Facilities Repairs 211,600 211,600 Earthquake Hazard Improv. 150,000 150,000 . Fire Station #4 & II 10 Plan. 100,000 100,000 Fire Station #10 Const. 415,000 415,000 Street Light Replace account 80,000 80,000 CDBG Public Bldg. Projects 130,000 130,000 - Canterbury Apartments 1,675,000 1,675,000 Total Public Bldg. & Other Fac. 2,186,600 1,675,000 3,861,600 ' Total Public Works S11,029,895 1,892,000 12,921,895 PARKS DEVELOPMENT Riverside Park Parking 106,290 106,290 Liberty Park Pool Design 30,000 30,000 Sunnyside Park Rec. Center 150.000 150,000 Urban Forestry Program 50.000 50,000 S. Central Mini Park 90,000 90,000 Athletic Park Construction 90,000 90,000 Jordan Park Irrigation 20,000 20,000 Victory Tennis Crt. Redesign 7,500 7,500 N. Point Park 150.000 150,000 Glendale Youth Facility Land 108,000 108,000 Total Parks 693,790 108,000 801,790 MAYOR City-County Bldg. Rehab. 1,140,000 0 1,140.000 Total Mayor 1,140,000 0 1.140,000 PERCENT FOR ART 13,100 0 13,100 13.100 0 13.100 NON-DEPARTMENTAL Contingency 226,000 0 226,000 Slippage 98,953 98,953 Total Non-departmental 226,000 98,953 324,953 TOTAL USES S13,102,785 S2.098,953 S15,201,738 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 14TH YEAR OPERATING FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1988-89 1988-89 COUNCIL ADMIN. AMENDED ..ESOURCES BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET 1988 (14th Year) Entitlement $2,099,400 $0 $0 S2.099.400 Program Income 255,972 110,752 366,724 Prior Year Entitlement Balances 1,634,248 0 1,634,248 TOTAL RESOURCES $3,989,620 $110,752 $0 $4,100,372 PROJECTS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Capital Program and Planning: Assist Inc./Emergency Home Repair $200,000 $200,000 NHS Housing Revolving Loan Fund 75,000 75,000 New Hope Cultural Center 11,900 11,900 Westside Emergency Food Pantry 24,000 24,000 Housing Outreach Rental Program 29,000 29.000 New Women Family Shelter 175,000 175.000 Administration/Planning 382,000 382,000 Security Lock Program 30,000 30,000 Neighborhood Atty. Program 5,000 5,000 Operation of Existing Womens Shelter 25,000 25,000 Operation New Men/Family Shelter 38,500 38,500 Crime Prevention 70,000 70.000 Capitol West Boys &Girls Club 28,500 28,500 Rape Crisis Center 25,000 25.000 Alliance House Rehab. 30,000 30.000 YWCA Mechanical System Impr. 15,000 15,000 Neighborhood Self-Help Grants 25,000 25,000 Salt Lake City Housing Resource Board 3,000 3,000 Housing Development Corp. 300,000 300,000 Total Capital Program and Planning 1,491,900 0 1,491,900 Redevelopment Agency: Housing Rehabilitation 955.972 109,835 1,065.807 Total Redevelopment Agency 955,972 109,835 0 1,065,807 Building and Housing Services: Operation Paintbrush 35,000 35,000 Cleaning & Securing Vacant Properties 20,000 20,000 Total Building and Housing Services 55.000 55.000 Planning & Zoning: Environmental Assessments Required By HUD 7,800 7,800 Salt Lake Historic Survey 26,000 26,000 S. L. Community Progress Survey 7,000 7,000 S. L. Community Progress Survey Publication 4,500 4,500 Total Planning & Zoning 45,300 45,300 Total Development Serves 2,548,172 NON-DEPARTMENTAL Community Development Operating Contingency 89,516 0 89,516 Total Contingency 89,516 0 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS All Prior Year Projects 1,351,932 971 0 1,352.902 Total Contingency 1,351.932 971 TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $3,989,620 $110,806 $0 $4.100,426 MISCELLANEOUS GRANT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND AMENDED BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1988-89 1988-89 1988-89 COUNCIL AMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET RESOURCES State/County EMS Grant S63.000 SO $63,000 Fed/County Homeless Grant 66,000 0 66.000 SL County CDBG Grant 6,840 0 6,840 H.U.D. Rental Rehab. Grant 295.000 0 295,000 H.U.D. Secretary Grant 500,000 0 500,000 H.U.D. Section 103 Loan 1,675.000 -1.675.000 0 Mckinney Act Shelter Grant 62.000 62.000 Prior Year Grants: Homeless Mentally Ill 0 219 219 District Heating/Cooling 0 72,275 72,275 Rick Warner UDAG 0 237,568 237.568 Renter Rehab. Fed87/88 0 243.200 243.200 Renter Rehab. Fed88/89 0 295,000 295.000 TOTAL SOURCES S2.605.840 ($764.738) S1,841.102 EXPENDITURES Charges and Services $430,840 S910.262 $1,341.102 Housing Development Corp. 2,175.000 -1,675,000 500,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES S2.605,840 ($764,738) S1,841,102 CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND AMENDED BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1988-89 1988-89 1988-89 COUNCIL AMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET RESOURCES REVENUE Business License Permits $115.000 SO $115.000 TOTAL REVENUE 115,000 0 115.000 OTHER SOURCES Approp. of Fund Balance 12,500 40.000 52.500 TOTAL OTHER SOURCES 12.500 40,000 52.500 TOTAL RESOURCES $127.500 $40.000 $167,500 USES EXPENDITURES Operating & Maintenance $40,000 $0 840.000 Charges & Services 87,500 40.000 127.500 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 127,500 40,000 167.500 OTHER USES Approp. to Fund Balance 0 0 0 TOTAL OTHER USES 0 0 0 TOTAL USES $127,500 $40.000 $167.500 STAFFING DOCUMENT SUMMARY 1988-89 FULL-TIME POSITIONS BUDGETED COUNCIL AMENDED DEPARTMENT 1988-89 ADJUSTMENTS 1988-89 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 42.00 42.00 ATTORNEY 17.05 17.05 COUNCIL 12.00 12.00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 75.00 75.00 FINANCE 57.00 57.00 FIRE 325.50 325.50 MAYOR 35.00 35.00 PARKS 79.38 79.38 POLICE 432.00 432.00 PUBLIC WORKS 233.60 233.60 GENERAL FUND TOTAL 1308.53 0.00 1308.53 AIRPORT 226.00 226.00 GOLF 21.62 1.00 22.62 PUBLIC UTILITIES 356.00 356.00 GARBAGE 18.40 18.40 ENTERPRISE FUND TOTAL 622.02 1.00 623.02 DATA PROCESSING 44.00 44.00 FLEET MANAGEMENT 61.00 61.00 RISK MANAGEMENT 6.00 6.00 CENTRAL FIRE DISPATCH 19.50 19.50 GOVERNMENT IMMUNITY 1.95 1.95 INTERNAL SERVICE FUND TOTAL 132.45 0.00 132.45 TOTAL POSITIONS 2063.00 1.00 2064.00 SALT LAKE Cll. AIRPORT AUTh JR ITY BOARD AGENDA ITEM: Discussion Agenda (B) DATE: January 18, 1989 TO: Airport Authority Board FROM: Director of Airports SUBJECT: FY 1988/89 Capital Projects Budget Amendment - Approval The Salt Lake City Council has scheduled a public hearing on February 21, 1989 to consider amendments to the FY 1988/89 budget. I have reviewed and evaluated with my staff, our current capital budget and recommend the following changes for FY 88/89: Capital Projects I have attached an exhibit detailing the changes for capital projects approved in the FY 88/89 capital budget. As you will notice, our approved capital budget regarding projects approved earlier will stay within the authorized amount of $22,277,900. However, in conjunction with this, I am requesting a budget amendment in the amount of $20,044,100. This amendment will allow the Airport Authority to take advantage of a good bidding climate during the winter months and start construction during the months of April, May and June of 1989, thus receiving the benefit of the entire construction season. This will be the sixth year the Airport Authority has taken this approach and it has proven highly successful . These projects are contained in the five year Master Schedule, and as you will recall , the shared tenant telephone program, and the CF Airfreight/Joint Cargo Building were previously approved by the Board. SLCJA, 1 Airport Authority Board January 18, 1989 Page Two Current analysis indicate a positive cash flow through December, 1990 which includes the above mentioned construction projects and planned projects for FY 89/90 as well . This budget amendment has been presented to the Airport Affairs Committee for their review and comment. Therefore, it is respectfully requested that the Board approve the attached budget amendment as outlined. .14 i / o is E. Miller SALT LAKE CITY AIRPORT AUTHORITY FY 1988/69 CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET AMENDMENT APPROVED ESTIMATED 1989 REQUESTED BOARD FY 1988/89 ACTUAL NEW PROJECT BUDGET APPROVAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET ESTIMATE AMENDMENT RECEIVED COMMENTS 1 . Fire System modifications 200,000 160,000 160,000 Yes 2. Land Acquisition 750.000 750,000 750,000 Yes AIP GRANT $600,000 3. Terminal Telephone conversion 275,000 400,000 400,000 Yes 4. TU#2 Information Counters 65,000 65,000 65,000 Yes 5. Civil Air Patrol Hangar 50,000 50,000 50,000 Yes 6. Utah Community College 70,000 210,000 210,000 Yes 7. North Support Taxiway 1 .100,000 780,000 780,000 Yes AIP GRANT $575,000 8. Taxiway 'D' Reconstruction 490,000 510,000 510.000 Yes AIR NATIONAL GUARD $ 475,000 9. Noise Monitoring Project 680,000 450,000 450,000 Yes AIP GRANT $405,000 10. Ceiling Tile Concourse A,B C 472,000 0 0 Yes PROJECT DELAYED 11 . Firing Range/Explosive storage 75.000 90,000 90,000 Yes 12. Parking Structure Design 630.000 1 ,150,000 1 , 150.000 Yes 13. Airport II North Connecting Taxiway 235,000 290,000 290,000 Yes AIP GRANT $195,000 14. Runway 34R/16L Overlay 2, 150.000 580,000 580.000 Yes AIP GRANT $522,000 15. Highspeed Taxiway F2 975.000 765,000 765,000 Yes AIP GRANT $695,000 16. Highspeed Taxiway 16L 1 ,625,000 485,000 485,000 Yes AIP GRANT $440,000 17. F-2 Taxiway 2,000,000 1 ,400,000 1 .400,000 Yes AIP GRANT $1 ,200,000 18. 16R Touch Down Zone Lighting 250,000 465,000 465,000 Yes AIP GRANT $410,000 19. TU#2 Group Room 65,000 80,000 80,000 Yes 20. Apron reconstruction between Concourse B and C 1 ,600,000 1 , 140,000 1 , 140,000 Yes AIP GRANT $1 ,020,000 21 . 2200 West Landscaping 90,000 90,000 90,000 Yes 22. 1200 North widening and Landscaping 330,000 290,000 290.000 Yes 23. Entrance Road Widening 75,000 50,000 50,000 Yes 24. Abestos Removal and Insulation replacement 900,000 325,000 325,000 Yes 25. Concourse C lower level enclosure & HVAC upgrade 1 .200,000 1 ,550,000 1 ,550,000 Yes 26. South Employee Parking Lot 135,000 140,000 140,000 Yes 27. TU#2 Bag Claim Expansion and Delta Ramp Tower 3, 120,000 7,000,000 7,000,000 Yes 28. Long Term Parking Expansion and Landscaping 700,000 660,000 660,000 Yes 29. General Aviation Taxiway Reconstruction 200.000 200.000 200,000 Yes 30. Concourse 'B' Escalator and Elevator improvements 643.000 760.000 760,000 Yes 31 . Skycap Enclosures 50,000 0 0 Yes PROJECT DELAYED TO FY 89/90 32. F-1 & F-2 Bridge Design 60.000 102,000 102,000 Yes 33. TU#2 Panel Study 50.000 50.000 50,000 Yes 34. HVAC Replacement-FAA Tower 55,000 150.000 150,000 Yes 35. Control Center Modifications 62,900 65,000 65,000 Yes 36. Apron Reconstruction Between Concourse A and B 1 ,260,000 1 ,260,000 No AIP GRANT $1 ,034,000 37. F-1 & F-2 Taxiway Extension and Bridges 6,550,000 6,550,000 No AIP GRANT $3,760,000 SALT LAKE CITY AIRPORT AUTHORITY FY 1988/89 CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET AMENDMENT APPROVED ESTIMATED 1989 REQUESTED BOARD FY 1988/89 ACTUAL NEW PROJECT BUDGET APPROVAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET ESTIMATE AMENDMENT RECEIVED COMMENTS • 38. West Parallel Taxiway Repair North and South Ends 1 ,100,000 1 , 100,000 No RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT FUND 39. Airfield Signage Modifications 275,000 275,000 No AIP GRANT $247,500 40. Golf Course Improvements 850,000 850,000 850,000 Yes 41 . Terminal Entrance/Exit Roadway System Improvements 1 ,075,000 1 ,075,000 No 42. Cross Bar Elevated Roadway and 40th West Relocation 4,470,000 4,470,000 No AIP GRANT $4,025,000 43. Shared Tenant Telephone Program 150,000 150,000 Yes 44. Cargo Apron Expansion 1 ,300,000 1 ,300,000 No AIP GRANT $1 , 170,000 45. FSDO Office Expansion 100,000 100,000 No 46. ARFF Burn Pit Relocation 300,000 300,000 No 47. Runway 34L Bypass Taxiway 675,000 675,000 No AIP GRANT $510,000 48. 3700 West Improvements 680,000 680,000 No 49. Temporary Short Term/Employee Parking Lot Expansion 1 ,490,000 1 ,490,000 No 50. Concourse 'A' Modifications 100,000 100,000 No 51 . CF Airfreight & Joint Cargo Facility 695,000 695,000 Yes TOTALS 22,277,900 22, 102,000 20,220,000 42,322,000 REQUESTED BUDGET INCREASE 20,044, 100 SOURCE OF FUNDS AIP ENTITLEMENT & DISCRETIONARY GRANTS 16,808,500 RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT FUND 1 , 100,000 TENANT REIMBURSEMENT 925,000 FROM OPERATIONS 23,488,500 TOTAL 42,322,000 Salt Lake City Airport Authority Source of Funds Detail SUMMARY OF GRANTS 1987 Noise Grant 600,000 1987 Discretionary Grant 1 ,882,000 1987 Entitlement Grant 575,000 1988 Noise Grant 405,000 1988 Discretionary Grant 4,270,000 1988 Entitlement Grant 2,515,000 1988 Reliever Grant 195,000 1989 Discretionary Grant 1 , 170,000 1989 Entitlement Grant 5, 196,500 Total Grants 16,808,500 16,808,500 SUMMARY OF CONTRIBUTIONS 1988 Utah Air National Guard 475,000 1988 Delta North Support Taxiway 205,000 1988 F-2 Taxiway De-icing area 195,000 1988 Delta Concourse 8 Apron 50,000 Total Contributions 925,000 PORTION of APRON RECONSTRUCTION BETWEEN CONCOURSES "A" and "B" PROJECT NO. 2.1-09-8-88 The existing apron between Concourses A and B has exceeded it's life span and the pavement has experienced heavier loads with greater frequencies than originally anticipated when designed. Recent evaluations estimate the remaining life expectancy of the pavement to be one to five years depending on location, Reconstruction of this area is necessary to prevent further deterioration and minimize future maintenance and repair costs Survey of the area is 100% completed and design was started on September 15, 1988 by airport staff. Preliminary investigations indicate this project will include full depth reconstruction of the existing concrete apron. The existing failing pavement sections will be reproved and replaced with 16 inches of portland cement over 6" lean mix concrete subbase. Pavement transitions will be required on adjacent pavements to maintain acceptable grades for aircraft operations. Modifications to the existing utility and drainage system will be required. Pavement markings will be completed after completion of the apron reconstruction. Once colleted, reconstructing a portion of the apron will ensure continued use of the apron and reduce future maintenance repair costs. It will also • - irxrease the area available for parking heavier aircraft and reduce congestion during peak periods. PROJECT REVIEW BID AND AWARD Design September 15, 1988 Drawings/specifications available for bid February 17, 1989 Bid opening March 22, 1989 Bid award April 25, 1989 Start construction May 1, 1989 Project completed September 29, 1989 PROJECT BUDGET Estimated Construction Cost $1,260,000 7F r FUNDING AIP GY-ant (�ntit1 t). . Airport funds t (Ent .. . .. ... . . .. . ..... . ... .. .. .. . . . . ... . . . ... ... . .. . . . .. . ... . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . .51,226,000 . .. . . .. . .. . .. . . 226,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING.. .....$1,260,000 PROJECT LOCATION Il Sew -�_ .ter y eqR WfTI`70 T S ` • •rl i4 FUEL FARM 1P IllirstcTTLE f 8 la4RKtNG I 1 N - \ PUBLIC - GAT iiiir aim --�SUEPPAORT _ TU-2 i t I `� Po C• A - ;1 �•_______-.DELTA • 1,71:i M '_, SITAIRE LINES '1�� M s'"' i SITE SOUTH GATE 2 ., A • GATE'F4 ` M '"' 11 Air ——— ♦• 'B ----- I LEXIST. GRAVEL ___ 411 EXIST GRAY�L�RZrA� ��,���-�= 0E WEST PARALLEL TAXIWAY 11111.116.1 ©— O V6 © lip@ F p ; C RUNWAY APRON RECONS144TION r_N( 2/ Oozed Toaiwoy — 11 a F-1 and F-2 TAXIWAY EXTENSION & BRIDGES PROJECT NO. 1-16-11-87 PROJECT NO. 1-19-8-88 In order to maintain service vehicle traffic and utilize the airport service and maintenance facilities north of the existing Taxiway F-1 and F-2, an underpass under the taxiways will be constructed. Presently, a service road crosses the proposed taxiway alignment in a north-south direction and connects terminal facilities to other service centers north. The new underpass will be comprised of a completely enclosed "tunnel" structure approximately 540 feet long, 30 feet wide and 15.5 feet high underneath the two new taxiways. Approach sections on the north and south ends of the tunnel. structure will be constructed allowing vehicular traffic to transition the vertical elevation difference between prevailing ground surface and the floor of the tunnel structure. Also the F-1 and F-2 Taxiways will be extended to the West end of the Concourse D Apron. A final design has been completed by the consulting engineers and the Airport Authority for the tunnel. The "tunnel" will be constructed of composite steel/concrete superstructure, reinforced concrete walls and floors, waterproof construction, internal dewatering system for removal of stormwater and seeping groundwaters, corrosion protection system, superstructure insulation and safety features such as roadway lighting and traffic rails. Taxiway construction will include excavation, stabilization, aggregate subbase and 16 itches of portland cement over 6 inches of lean mix concrete. Modifications to the existing utility and drainage system will be required and taxiway edge and approach lights will be installed. Once this project is completed, it will simplify and expedite aircraft ground operations providing a better flow of incoming and outgoing aircraft and represents a stage in a cross-over taxiway system to the future far west runway. PROJECT REVIEW BID AND AWARD Design July 1, 1988 Drawings/specifications available for bid February 3, 1989 Bid opening March 8, 1989 Bid award April 11, 1989 Start construction April 17, 1989 Project completed October 20,1989 PROJECT BUDGET Estimated Construction Cost $6,550,000 PROTECT FUNDING AIP Grant (Discretionary) $3,760,000 Airport funds 2,790,000 `101'AL PROJECT FUNDING $6,550,000 PROJECT LOCATION F-1/F-2. TAX1W_A_Y_EXTENSION- N\N: Y ♦' •: •'•'• Z \\\r ii ...•••• :i i 1 li FUEL FARM o 0 F-1/ iiiii i I •• g BRI iiii ' ^ I r■ N ILIC 1K SKI -f-GATE IORTH . ~} 1 I 4 SUPPORT TU-2 I NM AREA N ‘, pi Po C" all � ,. .i — 'i DELTA TU-I :, �jilt S�RELIN z'B I LXIST GRAVEL RC • IF 0 EST PARALLEL TAXIWAY —_ 4 cs_.,,,,,-i- ® ' ) FI � RUNWAY — WEST PARALLEL TAXIWAY REPAIR - NORTH and SOUTH ENDS PROJECT NO. 1-17-7-88 Due to the damaged pavement at the north and south ends of the West Parallel Taxiway, reconstruction of certain areas are required to prevent further deterioration and minimize maintenance and repair costs. Some failing pavement sections will be excavated and overlaid with 16 inches of portland cement over 6 inches of lean mix concrete. Pavement transitions will be required on adjacent pavements to maintain acceptable grades for aircraft operations and will be constructed of various thickr ess's of bituminous pavement. PROJECT REVIEW BID AND AWARD necign August 1, 1988 Drawings/specifications available for bid February 10, 1989 Bid opening March 15, 1989 Bid award April 18, 1989 Start construction April 24, 1989 Project completed August 18, 1989 PROOEC,T BUDGET Estimated Construction Costs $1,100,000 PROJECT FUNDING Airport funds (Renewal and Replacement) $1,100,000 PROJECT LOCATION __ 4444 i---.----_-- \vo 4 , 1 0 .4.4. 6 iirc FUEL rAoto4 piihih ova jakollitrrn C Ap,'--. 1 2 i stionit....joet T '"•• .. ------ -41 IW- 1_ a „..,. ti P ----% Mill11111111111:111PkIV lb - ---. 1 0 I i •••,,,7 '.--11k.. PC11111°. I li 14XISt CRA91,_.P°M. It* `Nip rf-Ort- .,.. ...`,4, T PARALLEL TAXIWAY , ,...•• Eh .'-"..•.3.111 . )•L_ _\S . i ii NC--=-,- ---------•WEST PARA iL TAXIVil Y REPAIR . 1 I ._ _ ..._ AIRFIELD SIGNS PROJECT NO. 1-04-7-88 This project will upgrade existing signs and provide new airfield markings as required by the FAA 14CFR Part 139 rules and regulations. The following markings for air carrier operations on the airport are required. (a) existing "Hold" signs will be relocated to match the relocated "Hold Short Lines", (b) signs identifying taxiing routes on the movement area, (c) runway holding position markings and signs, (d) ILS critical area markings and signs. This project will also provide proper maintenance of each marking or lighting system installed and will ensure that all lighting on the airport, including that for aprons, vehicle parking areas, roadways, fuel storage areas and buildings is adequately adjusted or shielded to prevent interference with air traffic control and aircraft operations. PROJECT REVIEW BID AND AWARD Design August 1, 1988 Drawings/specifications available for bid March 17, 1989 Bid opening April 12, 1989 Bid award May 9, 1989 Start construction May 15, 1989 Project completed July 28, 1989 PROJECT BUDGET Estimated Construction Costs $275,000 PROJECT FUNDING AIP Grant (Entitlement) $247,500 Airport funds 27,500 TERMINAL ENTRANCE/EXIT ROADWAY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. To accommodate new requirements generated by the parking structure, and the relocation of a major portion of car rental activities, two additional lanes will be constructed on the parking lot curb side in Stage I. These lanes will provide direct arrnss to the structure for rental car pickup and return and relieve congestion now existing in front road area. In addition, terminal curb side lanes will be reconfigured significantly to the west of Terminal Unit #2. In Stage II several dividers will be added and relocated to accommodate rental car, and public requirements for ao-ess to the structure along with modifications to the bus plaza on the west side of Terminal Unit #2. PROJECT REVIEW BID AND AWARD Design October 15, 1988 Drawings/specifications available for bid February 27, 1989 - - Bid opening April 5, 1989 Bid award April 25, 1989 Start construction May 1, 1989 Project completed November 3, 1989 PROJECT BUDGET Estimated Construction Costs $1,075,000 PROJECT FUNDING Airport funds (Bond Proceeds Reimburseable) $1,075,000 4 PROJECr LOCATION ..._. . \ ../ --------._ --------____, _ ..____ _----------------- - '..*:::::::!.$!i.5'k:•.:......,•. .- _. - ,,.._.,z________—_______—______:__ .... . ... - . • ;:::..:...„.„:.:.:.,... . . . .. \, , ...,„.*•:;i•M/iii:ii.iiiiifg:Ifii;:iliF;:iii.!iii.:Mift/•:::::•:::::•:•:...... ....:':i...1 :•:•:•• .' %.•V::•:,:,, '''''' §i§: :•:•::.... • • •-'•• ,._...--• /,'•• ., • s.... ; ;:,:.*•'''',.:** :*::%./ , J.•' '„N,•••.,-..'. - • ...•.*.••\.'). •:'•...._i,•• !.: .'•,..Ii,-.:EP..::/:A.:7 BAGGAGE TUNNELS • .r1..c.,;:. L_.-..-";.,,-':,..:.:..•--•;-."':.:t,.-t..,-.-;•::.,. •I • `-'1:11i 5:•::K:::: . .i:i \:::::-. I. . . UTILITIES TUNNEL :. ;I .. ,..1::: i :.3:.:fi•.li f. i:i: ,i .• 1 • ROADWAY . I • . • REALIGNMENT • ,-. , , -„ ,. .. - iiiKaiiiiiiiiii.iiiiiiiiiiii . • _,./ ..... .i; .V . ...._.,A r I / ••:1.1/ : . . • .. ., If 4 I•, .:::..: :::: .;.•.i.: I -.. /.......1*.r..."---:. . . - I: l . i f ..: 1. i! • • dr .............;:.:'I ..,": I"1.*1 r. •-..--.--..- _,__-__-_-_,:.:----:"-. , I --1"--- 1 I:: .'s- '.....*1.1 it" .iff:":- '. . .!: I • .....,......,--.-=-.-.-7:-..._. • .••:. . t _.. 41...,..,.. ..4..• lk, ._ ---------....:_:.__.,...„ :::7-'7.......L_ ...Lau. ---._—•: 1 .... ,:li."4......:::::,:.:::: ." ,/.. : -.- . . . / • • ...'."—:"'"..— ',,- — . . —.--.".- :.....::..•-.-7... ..:Aik*... ?:::..- .......:-.::::•:- ,•.:! < - • .. --. :4"-4•--'- --.-----,-...-....:„...._. . .. ..*,.*:*--:-:-.::.:::.:-Ili:-,:::::::::-.:m:..:::,:.:••••'-'-'• .....,. - ... ....,....,..,_::--:,..-„,„.... ..• --.......____ ..,::•z,<:.• ••••-.-_:.,-....-z,:...-- - ....--- _N__ 1_,...- :-,.:%. ..--7 . •. • ••••••-:.:.'E t..-_:I. 0•7.:_s.--;...?,•-• .. . i •• -- - --..- •2::-.-:'..;:i.„...t.-,....• ... ..-4,...-:.-..._- --- • -__ / - . ..... ....r_. , 7 •-__. . . . •• L .. ., . . . , . • • )\7,:‹ CROSS BAR IMPROVEMENTS - 40th WEST STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 7-09-8-88 With the current expansion and development within the North Support Area, Cargo Area and the construction of the new golf course and parking structure, the necessity of an elevated roadway at the existing intersection of the NBAR and SEAR will be constructed to provide a better flow of traffic at the airport and to relieve congestion at intersections with the main entrance and exit road system. The new elevated roadway will be constructed on an embankment with four lanes and two bridges, exit ramps to the NEAR and SEAR and will be approximately 2800 feet long. The expansion within the North Support Area will also necessitate the relocation of 40th West to provide a better flow of traffic and to relieve congestion in front of the terminals. This project will include grading an existing dirt road, placing 10 inches of road has and 2 inches of asphalt surface coat over 3 inches of ham course. PROJECT REVIEW BID AND AWARD Design September 15, 1988 Drawings/specifications available for bid February 24, 1989 Bid opening March 22, 1989 Bid award April 18, 1989 Start construction April 24, 1989 Project completed October 31, 1989 PROJECT BUDGET Estimated Construction Cost $4,470,000 PROJECT FUNDING AIP Grant (Entitlement) $4,025,000 Airport funds (Band Proceeds Reimburseable) 445,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $4,470,000 PROJECT LCXATION l 1 40th WEST RELOCATION CROSS BAR ‘T . IM PROVEMENTS MPROVEMENTS I4(,,,_----::-..,,,------_, :`i: SHUTTLE PARKING \ PUBLIC ri,. CAR RENTAL PARKING 2/ -GA;EI TU- CARGO APRON EXPANSION PROJECT NO. 6.1-03-7-87 With the increases in the number of daily air cargo operations, the existing cargo apron facilities are inadequate to support this incased demand. As a result, during peak operating periods, there are no parking positions available and aircraft are removed from the cargo building areas resulting in considerable inefficiencies, potential schedule delays and higher operating costs. To help a comodate this demand, the cargo apron will be expanded. Survey of the area has been completed and design started October 1, 1988 by airport staff. This project will include excavation, stabilization, aggregate subbase and 15 inches of portland cement over 6 inches lean mix concrete. Nbdification to existing drainage system will be required and apron pavement markings completed. Expansion of the cargo apron will increase the area available for additional aircraft parking. • PROJECT REVEIW BID AND AWARD - - Design Oct fiber 1, 1988 Drawings/specifications available for bid March 3, 1989 Bid opening April 5, 1989 Bid award May 9, 1989 Start construction May 15, 1989 Project completed September 15,1989 PROJECT BUDGET Estimated Construction Costs $1,300,000 PROJECT FUNDING AIP Grant (Discretionary) $1,170,000 Airport funds 130,000 'lv"'AL PROJECT FUNDING $1,300,000 PROJECT LOCATION • 4 cam. SeQR 1 1 -NB �� i_. ______7.------11-------- 44, ...,....... :::„...,,, 1 \ PSHUTTLENPARKING n CAR ;:T2Efc , a ______________ rc=3 , IL=Iwo ---1111 Or air , <11-I f �;;4 SOUTH ~ GATE 42 CARGO ' • APRONI '• 8 7,/"-- \j- __ _ . _ / q. EXIST. GRAY/tL ROAD j /77-- / 0 CARGO APRON EXPANSIO © 0 (17(/-. C rr-(4"1 �__-.. _ RUNWAY C :// ___r.\\ -- --- // Closed Taxi way 1 FAA FLIGHT SAFETY DISTRICT OFFICE EXPANSION PROJECT NO. 10-02-11-88 The existing area in the Flight Safety District office will be expanded by approximately 2500 square feet to the south to provide additional offirs. This project will include renovation of existing lighting, HVAC and relocation of partitions. PROJECT REVIEW BID AND AWARD Design January 1, 1989 Drawings/specifications available for bid March 24, 1989 Bid opening April 19, 1989 Bid award May 2, 1989 Start construction May 8, 1989 Project canpleted September 1, 1989 PROJECT BUDGET Estimate Construction Costs $100,000 PROJECT FUNDING Airport funds $100,000 PROJECT LOCATION f )...V" \ FAA'.FLIG IT SAFETY OFFICE EXPAIJSIONJ Q inr ar,rlL gir y TO SALT LAKE CITY d ..wr �`r OZ ammimPlommK wim ..-i - ( if ARFF BURN PIT RELOCATION PROJECT NO. 1-18-10-88 The existing Burn Pit does not conform to new FAA standards under Advisory Circular "Design Standards For An Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Training Facility" and must be relocated to conform to the standards. Aircraft rescue and firefighting (ARFF) personnel require realistic training in the application of extinguishing agents using airport's ARFF vehicles on an appropriately sized fire area, which is termed the burn area. The surrounding area has to allow ARFF vehicles to maneuver within the training facility and aircraft mock-ups are required to support the simulation of an aircraft fire. The burn area structure is designed specifically for the creation of "realistic" aircraft ancident environment. This project will also require a concrete apron with curb or berm, crushed stoves and vented fuel/water separator. Also included in this project will be any clean-up required at the existing burn pit area. PROJECT REVIEW BID AND AWARD Design October 15, 1988 • - Drawings/specifications available for bid March 3, 1989 Bid opening March 22, 1989 Bid award April 11, 1989 Start construction April 17, 1989 Project completed July 14, 1989 PROJECT BUDGED Estimated Construction Costs $300,000 PROJECT FUNDING Airport funds $300,000 PROJECT LOCATION = 4000 WEST STREET FUEL FARM g millall NORTH 1 ARE SUPPORT 0r� WI � _ DELTA AIR LINES SITE W ILXIST GR AA ROAD- —--- _ — _ _ .- -- __= — „ I-- CC J_ _ _ _ _ i N WEST PARALLEL TAXIWAY R = _ 2 Cr 'G Z.) I.1)cc I— _ IS I O AR F F BURN PIT N RELOCATION 1 . I t rGATE*65 3200 WEST STREET ,� .. 34L BYPASS TAXIWAY (A-1) PROJECT NO. 1-17-7-88 With the increase in the volumn of aviation activity currently being experienced, causing taxiway and runway congestion resulting in delays of aircraft operations, excessive fuel consumption and increased operating costs, recent evaluations indicate the construction of the 34L Bypass Taxiway is required to help accamodate this accp]erated activity. Survey of the area is completed and design was started on September 1,1988 by airport staff. Preliminary investigations indicate this project will include excavation, stabilization, subbase and 16 inch thick portland cement over 6 inch thick lean mix concrete subbase. Where the bypass taxiway ties into Runway 34L-16R, 17 inches of bituminous pavement surfaced with a porous friction course material will be placed. Pavement transitions will be required on adjacent pavements to maintain acceptable grades for aircraft operations. Modifications to the existing utility and drainage system will be required along with the installation of taxiway lighting. Pavement markings will be completed after completion of the taxiway construction. Once completed, the bypass taxiway will help relieve congestion and minimize delays of daily aircraft operations. • . PROJECT REVIEW BID AND AWARD Design August 15, 1988 Drawings/specifications available for bid February 10, 1989 Bid opening March 15, 1989 Bid award April 18, 1989 Start construction April 24, 1989 Project completed August 18, 1989 PROJECT BUDGET Estimated Construction Costs $675,000 PROJECT FUNDING AIP Grant (Discretionary) $510,000 Airport funds 165,000 '1UI'AL PROJECT FUNDING $675,000 PROJECT LOCATION v _I r ...y I ir..... .: r I , TV 3 ....1 8UTM/411MI.M2 .:11 c. • Gt00 .9 TV I . i 1II • u 6. . A A MOI.IM6 KAOM / w IT MAA a A<IWA • V. 0 oC • ® o'C� 0CalpZj • i O 34L BYPASS TAXIWAY (A-1) �o . . ) iS•s■! II • [ • / . 1 3700 WEST STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 7-07-8-88 Recent expansion and developments within the South Support and Cargo Area necessitate improving the existing access road. 3700 West Street will be improved southward to the golf course entrance and the existing roadway overlaid. This project will include 2-4" of asphalt paving and replacement of various sections of concrete curb and gutter. This improvement will increase the life of this roadway system. PROJECT REVIEW BID AND AWARD Design September 15, 1988 Drawings/specifications available for bid March 17, 1989 Bid opening April 12, 1989 Bid award April 25, 1989 Start construction May 1, 1989 Project completed September 29, 1989 PROJECT BUDGET Estimate Construction Costs $680,000 PROJECT FUNDING Airport funds $680,000 PROJECT LOCATION -iL 7 „ . l \ 4 ---------------'- '' ------"--:---':---'- z ---- ' '-----T 0 iP SHUTTLE PARKING PUBLIC # -E--GATEI CAR RENTAL PARKING 3700 WEST TU-2 IMPROVEMENTS (J EI 1LIJ;stilt... .get I _ r ■ a TU_I 1 'SOUTH GATE 2 S E` 14 CARGO APRON iIII B^ �4,I • iEXIST. GRAVEL ROAD j \I ' RUNWAY TEMPORARY SHORT TERM/EMPLOYEE PARKING LOP EXPANSION PROJECT NO. During parking structure construction the entire short term lot will be closed from January 1990, until November of 1991. A new temporary lot with approximately 1400 stalls will be constructed in 1989 to offset this loss. The Master Plan calls for this area to be developed into employee parking and will be utilized as such starting in 1992. Also Delta's employee lot, impacted by Loop Road realignment, will be expanded 125 stalls to off set initial losses incurred, and provide for additional losses to be incurred when the IU#2 Bus Plaza/VIP parking must be relocated to accommodate 'IU#2 Bag Claim Area expansion and Ramp Tower addition. PROJECT REVIEnI BID AND AWARD Design November 1, 1988 Drawings/specifications available for bid April 3, 1989 Bid opening May 5, 1989 - Bid award June 6, 1989 Start construction June 12, 1989 Project completed Oootber 13, 1989 PROJECT BUDGED Estimated Construction Costs $1,490,000 PROJECT FUNDING Airport funds (Bond proceeds reimbursable) $1,490,000 PRO,JE CT LOCATION // TEMPORARY SHORT TERM/EMPLOYEE PARKING.ARKiNG j � Se46, EMPLOYEE �� SNORT TERM. �� 4 .,:•::::::. -c: 4Pr...... - 0 : ---.N... SHUTTLE NUTTLE \1 P PARKINGri ::: PUBLIC CAR RENTAL PARKING I -<-GATE#I :: i TU-2 �� p o C" ii >'/ - 'hi? 4 00, TU-I - 1 lima IMMO III SOUTH GATE 2 E`14 CARGO APRON / I\ 8 - ------,-- M CONCOURSE "A" MODIFICATION PROJECT NO. 2.1-05-12-87 This modification project will upgrade the appearance and improve traffic flag in the concourse. It will include new interior finishes, new podiums arxi new sign clouds for the airlines. PROJECT REVIEW BID AND AWARD Design January 15, 1989 Drawings/specifications available for bid April 17, 1989 Bid opening May 15, 1989 Bid award May 28, 1989 Start ccnstrution June 3, 1989 Project canpleted September 28, 1989 PROJECT BUDGET Estimate Construction Costs $100,000 PROJECT FUNDING Airport funds $100,000 PROJECT LOCATION ldf 110 1 TY2 51gR-Ew C „if ". CONCOURSE "A" MODIFICATION