01/10/1989 - Minutes PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI, UTAH
TUESDAY, JANUARY 10, 1989
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of
the Whole on Tuesday, January 10, 1989, at 5:00 p.m. in Suite 300, City
Hall, 324 South State Street.
The following Council Members were present:
Florence Bittner Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk
Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Willie Stoler
Sydney Fonnesbeck
Council Chairperson Stoler presided at the meeting.
The Council interviewed Ms. said that she had been doing a lot
Catherine Dee, prior to consider- of fund raising and had helped
ation of her proposed appointment with some of the legal matters the
to the Salt Lake City Arts Coun- theatre was involved with. She
cil. Ms. Dee said that she had said that she looked forward to
many years of involvement with helping the Arts Council in the
various community organizations same way. Councilmember Godfrey
and was a frequent and involved said that the legal help was
patron of the arts in Utah. She needed. Ms. Noda said that she
said that she had the time to work was looking at helping put togeth-
with the Council and was looking er more federal grant application
forward to doing her part. packets and helping with some of
Councilmember Stoler thanked her the contractual problems that
for her time and said that she had arise.
a very impressive resume.
Lee King, Staff Budget Auditor,
reviewed the schedule for upcoming
The Council interviewed Mr. meetings of the Winter Games
Stephan Hausknecht, prior to Organizing Committee. He asked
consideration of his proposed the Council to inform him if they
appointment to the Salt Lake City were going to attend the meetings
Arts Council. Mr. Hausknecht said so staff could post a Council
that he had spent the last couple agenda, if necessary. Linda
of years working with the Arts Hamilton, Executive Director, said
Council as a volunteer and was that the staff would inform the
interested in working as an offi- Council of upcoming meetings as
cial member of the Council. soon as they were scheduled.
Councilmember Horrocks asked if he
had enough time to be involved. Ms. Hamilton then reviewed the
He said that by being a volunteer Council agenda. She said that the
he got used to just how much time draft ordinance relating to golf
the Council involved. course greens fees was based on
the recommendations from the Parks
The Council interviewed Ms. Laurie Department and the Mayor. She
Noda, prior to consideration of said that the Council would be
her proposed appointment to the given a briefing on the changes in
Salt Lake City Arts Council. Ms. the next Committee of the Whole
Noda said that she was an attorney meeting.
and had been working with the
Children' s Dance Theatre as Chair Councilmember Florence Bittner
of the Finance Committee. She said that she appreciated the
89-11
PROCEI. INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY', UTAH
TUESDAY, JANUARY 10, 1989
executive summary that was put that it would take time to estab-
with the County Landfill Budget lish a system of inspections,
packet. She said that it made it follow-ups and awarding permits.
much more understandable. Ms. Ms. Bittner said that she wanted
Hamilton said that the staff had the priority to be put on the
some issues that they thought inspections and not the fees that
worth studying during the next came from the permits. Mr.
budget process such as dumping Caldwell said that the permit fees
fees for other cities, long term weren't to raise money but were
planning and recycling programs. set to cover the cost of the
Councilmember Sydney Fonnesbeck process. Chief Sumner said that
said that landfill and solid waste the process would be "permit
disposal was becoming a major driven" , centralizing the process
problem in most cities and that for better control and scheduling
Salt Lake had a good opportunity of inspections, and putting a high
to develop long range plans to level of safety as the main prior-
avoid the problems before they ity. Ms. Bittner asked how the
became a crisis. Councilmember department found out about new
Roselyn Kirk asked if the new sites. Chief Sumner said that
position proposed in the budget they' worked with local engine
was really needed. Mr. Brad companies and the business licens-
Stewart of Public Works, said ing division to track new sites.
there was a problem with a "back-
door" entrance to the dump. Mr. Mr. Godfrey asked if the Fire
Bond said that they were trying to Department agreed with Cam' s
control the traffic at that point proposal to put all 44 permits in
without putting a person there. use. Chief Sumner said that the
department could not handle in-
Mr. Cam Caldwell, Staff Budget spections for all 44 permits at
Analyst, reviewed proposed changes this . time. He said that he felt
to the Uniform Fire Code ( see very uncomfortable putting a law
attachment) . Battalion Chief on the books that the department
George Sumner said that the Fire could not implement.
Department agreed in principle Councilmember Stoler asked if the
with Mr. Caldwell ' s recommendation existing staff could handle the
but that he felt uncomfortable workload. Chief Sumner said no,
requiring permits and inspections but said as revenue from the
for all of the 44 proposed sites permits increased, more staff
before he had the resources to could be brought on to expand the
actually do the work. He said program.
that by starting with the proposed
categories, the Department would
be able to work into the program
slowly, building the program as
revenues increased. . He said that
it was the department' s goal to
involve all 44 permits as soon as
possible. .
Ms. Fonnesbeck asked what the
department needed to be ready for
all the inspections. Chief Sumner
said that the department had never
had a program like this one and
• 89-12 .
PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITT, UTAH
TUESDAY, JANUARY 10, 1989
(Attachment #1)
ADOPTION OF 1988 UNIFORM FIRE CODE
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION BY: Cam' Caldwell
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: To adopt the 1988 edition of the Uniform
Fire Code.
BACKGROUND ' INFORMATION: The City formally adopted the 1982 edition of the
Uniform Fire Code several years ago. The Fire Department is now propos-
ing that this code be formally updated, consistent with the recommenda-
tions of the Western Fire Chief' s Association and the International
Conference of Building Officials.
The 1988 code is proposed for adoption with a few changes. Those changes
have been reviewed with the City Attorney' s Office and the Fire Depart-
ment staff. The most significant amendment to the code is the deletion
of the requirement for permits for thirty-six uses and locations identi-
fied as high hazard locations in the code. The proposed amendments seek
to establish permit fees, adopted by the City Council, for only eight
locations and uses. In the existing language of the code, fees for the
inspections associated with awarding permits are established administra-
tively.
The Fire Department has indicated that no fees have been established in
the past. The Fire Department projects that $22, 700 in new revenue will
be generated if the eight locations and uses are charged permit fees. The
proposed fee structure was intended to achieve legislative intent to
generate $33,000 in hazardous materials inspection fees. This money was
to be generated by the Fire Department to finance a fire prevention
inspector position which had been proposed for elimination in the pro-
posed budget submitted by the Mayor.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The Council staff support the adoption
of the revised version of the Uniform Fire Code, with the exception of
the amendments to eliminate permit requirements for the thirty-six uses.
The Uniform Fire Code requires permits for these locations because of
their high hazard potential. Council staff take the position that the
requiring of permits for the thirty-six additional locations and uses
will 1 ) bring more locations into compliance with the code and thereby
prevent possible fires, and 2) assist firefighters to extinguish fires
that may occur at these high hazard locations by familiarizing them with
any hazardous materials or life threatening conditions which may exist.
•
Inspections are currently conducted by the fire prevention staff or by
department engine companies. Council staff recommend that permit fees be
established for each of these high hazard locations. We recommend that
89-13
PROCEOINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIT, UTAH
TUESDAY, JANUARY 10, 1989
the administration continue to set these fees, and that they be based
upon the full cost of preparing for and conducting the inspections,
including all reasonable costs associated with processing the permits.
Council staff also recommend that the proposed code include 1 ) a penalty
clause of up to $1, 000 for flagrant violations of the code which endanger
the public, and 2) a penalty of double the price of the permit for inad-
vertent failure to obtain a permit. The double charge for the inadvert-
ent failure to obtain a permit is the current practice of the Engineering
Department. The City Attorney' s Office concurs with this recommendation.
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: I move that we close this hearing concerning the
Uniform Fire Code.
I move that we refer the ordinance adopting the Uniform Fire Code to the
City Attorney' s Office to . redraft 1 ) Section 4. 108 defining the opera-
tions, activities, practices or functions for which a permit is required;
and 2) 'to establish penalties for flagrant violation of the code, and
inadvertent failure to obtain a permit.
ANTICIPATED OPPOSITION: Opposition may be voiced by businesses which are
required to pay for the permit fees. Council staff recommend that those
who 1 ) have a business use identified as a high hazard location, and 2 )
receive the benefit of a permit inspection should pay for the reasonable
costs associated with making that inspection. This was Council ' s origi-
nal position in designating that the fees should be established when the
legislative intent was proposed.
The Fire Department may also oppose the Council staff position on the
basis that they are currently inadequately staffed to perform the inspec-
tions out of the Fire Prevention Bureau. Council staff believe that
these inspections can be performed by the engine companies, if they are
not conducted by the Fire Prevention Bureau.
89-14
" PROC INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI, UTAH
TUESDAY, JANUARY 10, 1989
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in regular session on
Tuesday, January 10, 1989, at 6:00 p.m. in Suite 300, City Hall, 324
South State Street.
The following Council Members were present:
Florence Bittner Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk
Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Willie Stoler
Sydney Fonnesbeck
Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Kathryn
Marshall, City Recorder, and Lynda Domino, Chief Deputy City Recorder,
were present.
Councilmember Stoler presided at and conducted the meeting.
OPENING CEREMONIES the trolley, the downtown free
fare zone, ski bus service, and
#1. The invocation was given the BYU Football Flyer. They also
by Police Chaplain David Raisor. had a school education program
about public transportation.
#2. The Council led the
Pledge of Allegiance. Street Life - Brown Bag
Concert Series, for providing
#3. Councilmember Godfrey music, dance, performance arts,
moved and Councilmember Kirk and literary readings in various
seconded to approve the minutes of city parks during the summer.
the Salt Lake City Council for the
regular meeting held Tuesday, Neighborhood Focus - First
January 3, 1989, which motion Step House, for setting a good
carried, all members voted aye. example in their neighborhoods by
(M 89-1) providing all-night security,
clearing trees and providing good
#4. Mayor Palmer DePaulis lighting, and acting as a neigh-
presented the 1988 Urban Design borhood watch and providing infor-
Awards. Mayor DePaulis said this mation to the community councils.
annual event had great meaning and
had become a good forum to recog- Balance - Tanner Park, for
nize individuals and groups who preserving green space.
worked to make Salt Lake City more
livable. He thanked the Salt Lake Dedicated Participants -
City Arts Council, the Deseret R/UDAT participants, for preparing
News, and the Urban Design Coali- a 66 page comprehensive pamphlet
tion for their support and work in laying out goals to better plan
making the awards possible. He Salt Lake City and make it a more
presented awards in the following livable, exciting city.
categories:
In conclusion Mayor DePaulis
Transportation - UTA, for said he thought it was important
cooperative support in alternative to celebrate the city and its
transportation systems including arts. He said he thought awards
89-15
PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI, UTAH
TUESDAY, JANUARY 10, 1989
such as these would be an impor- NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS
tant criteria for cities that
would lead the county forward and #1. RE: A resolution ap-
be recognized. proving the City and County Land-
fill Budget for 1989.
CONSENT AGENDA ACTION: Councilmember
Godfrey moved and Councilmember
Councilmember Kirk moved and Hardman seconded to suspend the
Councilmember Godfrey seconded to rules and on first reading adopt
approve the consent agenda, which Resolution 12 of 1989, which
motion carried, all members voted motion carried, all members voted
aye. aye.
(B 89-1)
#1. RE: Approving the ap-
pointment of Joe Duke-Rosati to
the Salt Lake City/County Board of UNFINISHED COUNCIL BUSINESS
Health.
(I 89-1) #1. RE: A resolution author-
izing the execution of a fourth
#2. RE: Approving the ap- supplemental indenture for the
pointments of Catherine Dee, $8, 800,000 Salt Lake City, Utah
Stephen Hausknecht, and Laurie Industrial Development Revenue
Noda to the Salt Lake City Arts Bonds (Landmark Hotel - Airport
Council. Holiday Inn) Series 1986.
(I 88-23)
ACTION: Councilmember Kirk
#3. RE: Set a date for a moved and Councilmember Godfrey
public hearing to be held Tuesday, seconded to adopt Resolution 9 of
January 17, 1989, at 6:40 p.m. to 1989, which motion carried, all
obtain public comment concerning a members voted aye.
proposed ordinance increasing fees (Q 86-18)
at the city' s golf courses.
(0 89-3) #2. RE: A resolution adopt-
ing the Downtown Master Plan,
#4. RE: Resolution 10 of supplementing the 1967 Master Plan
1989 authorizing the execution of of Salt Lake City.
an interlocal cooperation agree-
ment between Salt Lake City Corpo- ACTION: Councilmember
ration and the Utah Department of Godfrey moved and Councilmember
Transportation for UDOT to repair Hardman seconded to adopt Resolu-
and replace guardrail as needed tion 13 of 1989, which motion
upon request of Salt Lake City. carried, all members voted aye.
(C 89-2) (T 88-26)
#5. RE: Resolution 11 of
1989, authorizing the execution of PUBLIC HEARINGS
an interlocal cooperation agree-
ment between Salt Lake City Corpo- #1. RE: A public hearing
ration and the Utah Department of scheduled for 6: 20 p.m. to obtain
Transportation whereby the city public comment concerning the
agrees to sweep certain streets Uniform Fire Code of the Salt Lake
for which it will be paid by UDOT. City Code, 1988, with various
(C 89-3) deletions and additions.
89-16
PROCE2 INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIA, UTAH
TUESDAY, JANUARY 10, 1989
ACTION: Councilmember because he could foresee a draft-
Godfrey moved and Councilmember ing problem.
Hardman seconded to close the
public hearing, which motion Linda Hamilton, Council Exec-
carried, all members voted aye. utive Director, suggested that
Council Staff meet with the Fire
Councilmember Godfrey moved Department and the Attorney' s
and Councilmember Kirk seconded to Office to discuss the most practi-
refer the ordinance adopting the cal way to handle this. She then
Uniform Fire Code to the. City indicated she would let the Coun-
Attorney's Office to redraft 1 ) cil know what they decided.
Section 4. 108 defining the opera- (0 89-2)
tions, activities, practices or
functions for which a permit is
required; and 2) to establish The meeting ad ' urned at 6:40
penalties for flagrant violation p.m.
of the code and inadvertent fail-
ure to obtain a permit, which
motion carried, all members voted
aye. C CIL CHAI PERSON
DISCUSSION: No one from city
staff gave a report on this item —A444.41L—
and no one from the audience
spoke. CI Y RE ER
Councilmember Fonnesbeck said
the Council realized that there
would be a period of time to phase
in the permit system as altered,
perhaps two or three years.
Roger Cutler, City Attorney,
asked if the Council wanted his
office to specify deadlines for
when various provisions would take
effect.
Councilmember Godfrey indi-
cated that they weren' t actually
asking for dates but just to phase
the riew procedure in over a. period
of time. Councilmember Fonnesbeck
said they . didn't want to set
specific dates . when provisions
would become effective because
this encompased man power and
training issues.
Mr. Cutler said in order to
give notice to the public they
would probably need a more defi-
nite schedule. . He said he would
have to give some thought 'to this
89-17
`v a /'-c SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENL
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
SUITE 300, CITY HALL
324 SOUTH STATE STREET
Tuesday, January 10, 1989
6:00 p.m.
A. BRIEFING SESSION: 5:00 - 5:55 p.m. , Suite 300 City Hall, 324 South State.
1. Report of the Executive Director.
2. The City Council will interview Catherine ,, Stephen Hausknecht, and
Laurie Noda, prior to consideration of their proposed appointments to the
Salt Lake City Arts Council.
B. OPENING CEREMONIES:
1. Invocation.
2. Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Approval of the Minutes.
4. Mayor Palmer DePaulis will present the 1988 Urban Design Awards.
C. COMMENTS:
1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
2. Citizen Comments to the Council.
D. CONSENT:
1. City/County Board of Health - Appointment.
Consider approving the appointment of Joe Duke-Rosati to the Salt Lake
City/County Board of Health.
(I 89-1)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve.
2. Salt Lake City Arts Council - Appointments.
/ 4 r �
Consider approving the appointments of Catherine Dee, Stephen Hausknecht,
and Laurie Noda to the Salt Lake City Arts Council.
( I 88-23) \ jr
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve.
3. Golf Fees.
Set a date for a public hearing to be held Tuesday, January 17, 1989, at
).111111/
6:40 p.m. , to obtain public comment concerning a proposed ordinance
increasing fees at the City's golf courses.
O 89-3)
•
Ci)
STAFF RECOPENDATION: Set date, Refer to Committee of the Whole
D. CONSENT Cor 'd.
4. Interlocal Cooperation Agreement - UDOT - Guardrail Work.
Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Utah
Department of Transportation for UDOT to repair and replace guardrail as •
needed upon request of Salt Lake City. 1 Q i,�..s µ Q r-,c( ra 1 13
(C 89-2) Gt o u 4 A u .t sp, _ i c."e
rJ e c)e . !- A. fez.4a.. o „A..*ad. 1 r
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt.
5. Interlocal Cooperation Agreement - UDOT - Street Sweeping.
Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Utah
Department of Transportation whereby the City agrees to sweep certain
streets for which it will be paid by UDOT. c+4+ e_ S+ram e s w/ • .
(C 89-3) C.. 1 45 , '3 y. m f(/Ai+l a 4n t csa/
STAFF RECOMMENDATION;., Adopt.
• E. NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS:
1. City/County Landfill Budget.
Consider adopting a resolution approving the City and County Landfill Budget
for 1989. ,e_ te_,o
•
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Suspend the Rules and Adopt on First
_ 401,400.4
F. UNFINISHED COUNCIL BUSINESS:.
1. Industrial Development Revenue Bond - Landmark Hotel/Holiday Inn.
Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of a fourth
supplemental indenture for the $8,800,000 Salt Lake City, Utah Industrial
Development Revenue Bonds (Landmark Hotel - Airport Holiday Inn) Series
1986.
(Q 86-18) Q
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt contingent upon the approval of the
City's Director of Finance and the City
Attorney.
2. Downtown Master Plan.
Consider adopting a resolution adopting the Downtown Master Plan,
Supplementing the 1967 Master Plan of Salt Lake City.
(T 88-26)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Uniform Fire Code.
:: 6: 20 p.m.
Obtain public comment and consider adopting an ordinance adopting the
Uniform Fire Code of the Salt Lake City Code, 1988, with various deletions
and additions.
(0 89-2)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Close Hearing. Refer Ordinance to the
City Attorney's Office to redraft 1)
Section 4. 108 defining required permits
and 2) establishing penalties for
violations and failure to obtain a
permit.
(See Staff Recommendation in Packet. )
H. ADJOURNMENT.
** FINAL ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AID/OR ORDINANCES ADOPTED CONCERNING ANY ITEM ON THIS AGENDA
DATED: January 6, 1989
BY: .
CHIEF DEPUTY CI RE ORDER
STATE OF UTAH )
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ss.
On the 6th day of January, 1989, I personally delivered a copy of the foregoing
notice to the Mayor and City Council and posted copies of the same in conspicuous
view, at the following times and locations within City Hall, 324 South State
Street, Salt Lake City, Utah:
1. At 5:00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office, 5th Floor; and
2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom, Room 336.
. ' 4,1401AAiLLO
CHIEF DEPUT RECORDER
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6th day of Janua 989.
Notary lic residi
State of Utah
My Commission Expires:
(F......-- (.----cF.
APPROVAL:
_� —-
�-,_,,EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SALT LAKE CITY ARTS COUNCIL
ORDINANCE CITATION: 2.32.020
MEMBERSHIP: 15-25 members appointed by the Mayor
TERM: 3 Years
QUALIFICATIONS: The Council shall include representatives from CBO's such as
ethnic groups, busines organizations, labor unions, neighborhood councils,
volunteer groups and churches; arts groups--proffessional, amateur art
organizations, artists and art administrators; and the community at large.
ADVICE AND CONSENT: yes
OATH OF OFFICE: no
PURPOSE: The Council is an advisory board to the City in all matters that
pertain to the arts. As the designated art agency, the Council: ( 1)
Administers City arts grants programs which provide financial assistance to
community arts organizations. (2) Promotes and encourages public artistic
performances. (3) Develops programs that introduce performing art to city
residents who have had no previous contact. (4) Sponsors art education
classes, monthly literary readings, visual arts exhibitions, Summer Brown Bag
and park concerts, winter concerts and urban design programs. (5) Provides
programs planning and technical assistance to arts, ethnic and neighborhood
groups.
NAME COUNCIL INITIAL TERM
DISTRICT APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION DATE
1 . Lynn Jacobsen 4 10/84( 10/85) 3rd Term
274 South 1200 East 10/85( 10/87) 10/00/90
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 - 11/87
Phone: (H)581-0064
2. Roger Borgenicht Resigned 3 3/87(10/87 1st Term
20 South 1200 East 11/87 10/00/90
Salt Lake City Utah 84102
Phone: (H)359-4009 (W)355-7085
3. Ken Burton Vacancy 6 10/79(10/82) 3rd Term
1750 East 1300 South 11/82( 10/85) 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 2/86
Phone: (H)581-9100 (W)581-6466
4. Craig Carter Vacancy 6 10/79(10/82) 3rd Term
1747 South Wasatch Drive 11/82( 10/85) 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 2/86
Phone: (H)583-9217 (W)531-9082
5_ Lake Churchill Vacancy 3 10/79(10/82) 3rd Term
239 E. South Temple 11/82( 10/85) 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 2/86
Phone: (H)328-3294 (W)530-1800
6. Kathleen McMahon 3 10/84( 10/85) 3rd Term
299 Center Street #206 10/85( 10/87) 10/00/90
Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 11/87
Phone: (H)521-0793
Salt Lake Art's Council
Page Two
7. Stan Roberts 6 3/87(10/87) 1st Term
2830 Crestview Drive 11/87 10/00/90
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108
Phone: (H)583-3146 (W)531-8944
8. Jennifer Stevens 6 10/84( 10/85) 3rd Term
1935 Yale Ave. 10/85( 10/87) 10/00/90
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 11/87
Phone: (H)581-1227 (W)973-3307
9. Gerald McDonough 5 11/83( 10/86) 2nd Term
1997 South 800 East 3/87 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84105
Phone: (H)487-3587
10. Stephen Goldsmith 2 11/83( 10/86) 2nd Term
325 West Pierpont Avenue 3/87 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Phone: (H)359-9056 (W) 531-9378
11 . Peter Emerson 4 10/84( 10/86) 2nd Term
547 South 1100 East 3/87 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
Phone: (H)583-3783 (W)531-7600
12. Audrey Oestreicher Vacancy 6 10/79(10/82) 3rd Term
960 Donner Way #340 12/82( 10/85) 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 2/86
Phone: (H)583-3131
13. D'Arcy Pignanelli 3 4/87(10/87) 1st Term
480 Wall Street #B103 11/87 10/00/90
Salt Lake City, Utah 84103
Phone: (H)328-2282 (W)468-3404
14. Rodger Reynolds 3 10/80( 10/83) 3rd Term
681 4th Avenue 11/83( 10/86) 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 3/87
Phone: (H)355-2731 (W)581-6771
15. George Maxwell 3 3/87 1st Term
125 H Street 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84103
Phone: (H)328-4488 (W)581-6735
16. Charles R. Brown Vacancy 7 12/82 2nd Term
46 West 300 South, Suite 250 10/83( 10/85) 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 2/86
Phone: (H)486-2485 (W)532-3000
17. Olivette T. Orme Resigned 4 3/87 Unexpired Term
531 East 800 South 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
Phone: (H) 521-6113 (W)322-2428
Salt Lake Arts Council
Page Three
18. Sherine Stephens Vacancy 7 9/82(10/85) 2nd Term
2250 South 2300 East 2/86 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84109
Phone: (H)466-5642 (W)364-6942
20. Allen Dodworth Resigned 5 3/87 1st Term
1013 South 1300 East 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84105
Phone: (H) 583-1564 (W)582-2787
21 . Carleen Jimenez 1 3/87 1st Term
730 West 400 North 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Phone: (H)539-8475
22. Chris Montague Resigned 5 4/87 Unexpired Term
747 East 1700 South 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Ut. 84105
Phone: (H)467-0864 (W) 521-6040
23. Myron Richardson 3 11/83( 10/85) 2nd Term
76 S Street 2/86 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84103
Phone: (H)363-1088 (W) 364-4661
24. Council Member Tom Godfrey Ex-0fficio
300 City Hall
324 South State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84103
Meeting Schedule:
Second Wednesday, 5:30 p.m.
Art Barn, 54 Finch Lane
Staff Support: Nancy Boskoff 596-5000
ec12/20/88
—r to �•
SALT LAKE CITY ARTS COUNCIL
ORDINANCE CITATION: 2.32.020 \./
MEMBERSHIP: 15-25 members appointed by the Mayor
TERM: 3 Years
QUALIFICATIONS: The Council shall include representatives from CBO's such as
ethnic groups, busines organizations, labor unions, neighborhood councils, •
volunteer groups and churches; arts groups--proffessional, amateur art
organizations, artists and art administrators; and the community at large.
ADVICE AND CONSENT: yes
OATH OF OFFICE: no
PURPOSE: The Council is an advisory board to the City in all matters that
pertain to the arts. As the designated art agency, the Council: ( 1)
Administers City arts grants programs which provide financial assistance to
community arts organizations. (2) Promotes and encourages public artistic
performances. (3) Develops programs that introduce performing art to city
residents who have had no previous contact. (4) Sponsors art education
classes, monthly literary readings, visual arts exhibitions, Summer Brown Bag
and park concerts, winter concerts and urban design programs. (5) Provides
programs planning and technical assistance to arts, ethnic and neighborhood
groups.
• NAME COUNCIL INITIAL TERM
DISTRICT APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION DATE
1 . Lynn Jacobsen 4 10/84( 10/85) 3rd Term
274 South 1200 East • 10/85( 10/87) 10/00/90
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 11/87
Phone: (H)581-0064
2. Roger Borgenicht 3 3/87(10/87 Tcrm
20 South 1200 East 10/00/90
Salt Lake Ci •
ne: H)359-4009 (W)355-7085
3. Ken Burton 6 10/79( 10/82) 3rd Term
1750 East 1300 South 11/82( 10/85) 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 2/86
Phone: (H)581-9100 (W)581-6466
4. Craig Carter 6 10/79( 10/82) 3rd Term
1747 South Wasatch Drive 11/82( 10/85) 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 2/86
Phone: (H)583-9217 (W)531-9082
5. Lake Churchill 3 10/79( 10/82) 3rd Term
239 E. South Temple 11/82( 10/85) 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 2/86
Phone: (H)328-3294 (W)530-1800
6. Kathleen McMahon 3 10/84( 10/85) 3rd Term
299 Center Street #206 10/85( 10/87) 10/00/90
Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 11/87
Phone: (H)521-0793
Salt Lake Art's Council
-Page Two
7. Stan Roberts 6 3/87(10/87) 1st Term
2830 Crestview Drive 11/87 10/00/90
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108
Phone: (H)583-3146 (W)531-8944
8. Jennifer Stevens 6 10/84( 10/85) 3rd Term
1935 Yale Ave. 10/85( 10/87) 10/00/90
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 11/87
Phone: (H)581-1227 (W)973-3307
9. Gerald McDonough 5 11/83(10/86) 2nd Term
1997 South 800 East 3/87 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84105
Phone: (H)487-3587
10. Stephen Goldsmith 2 11/83( 10/86) 2nd Term
325 West Pierpont Avenue 3/87 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Phone: (H)359-9056 (W) 531-9378
11 . Peter Emerson 4 10/84( 10/86) 2nd Term
547 South 1100 East 3/87 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
Phone: (H)583-3783 (W)531-7600 •
.12. Audrey Oestreicher- 6 10/79( 10/82) - 3rd Term
960 Donner Way #340 12/82( 10/85) 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 2/86
Phone: (H)583-3131 .
13. D'Arcy Pignanelli 3 4/87(10/87) 1st Term
480 Wall Street I1B103 11/87 10/00/90
Salt Lake City, Utah 84103
Phone: (H)328-2282 (W)468-3404
14. Rodger Reynolds 3 10/80( 10/83) 3rd Term
681 4th Avenue 11/83(10/86) 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 3/87
Phone: (H)355-2731 (W)581-6771
15. George Maxwell 3 3/87 1st Term
125 H Street 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84103
' Phone: (H)328-4488 (W)581-6735
16. Charles R. Brown 7 12/82 2nd Term
46 West 300 South, Suite 250 10/83( 10/85) 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 2/86
Phone: (H)486-2485 (W)532-3000
17. Olivette T. Orme 4 3/87 Unexpired Term
531 East 800 South 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
Phone: (H) 521-6113 (W)322-2428
Salt Lake Arts Council
Page Three
18. Sherine Stephens 7 9/82(10/85) 2nd Term
2250 South 2300 East 2/86 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84109
Phone: (H)466-5642 (W)364-6942
20. Allen Dodworth 5 3/87 1st Term
1013 South 1300 East 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84105
Phone: (H) 583-1564 (W)582-2787
21 . Carleen Jimenez 1 3/87 1st Term
730 West 400 North 10/00/89
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Phone: (H)539-8475
22. Chris Montague 5 4/87 Unexpired Term
747 East 1700 South 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Ut. 84105
Phone: (H)467-0864 (W) 521-6040
23. Myron Richardson 3 11/83( 10/85) 2nd Term
76 S Street 2/86 10/00/88
Salt Lake City, Utah 84103
Phone: (H)363-1088 (W) 364-4661
24. Council Member Tom Godfrey Ex-Officio
300 City Hall •
324 South State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84103
Meeting Schedule:
Second Wednesday, 5:30 p.m.
Art Barn, 54 Finch Lane
Staff Support: Nancy Boskoff 596-5000
ec10/4/88
sALL armee[DA jog
PALMER DEPAULIS =., ® I t .
MAYOR
OFFICE OF. THE, MAYOR
324 SOUTH STATE STREET'..'
FIFTH FLOOR, SUITE 5001,6
SAL-F LAKE.C.IMUTAH 84111
535-7704
January 4, 1989
Willie Stoler, Chairperson and
Members of the City Council
324 South State Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Dear Chairman Stoler and Members of the City Council :
Attached is my proposed fee schedule for the golf courses. An ordinance
reflecting these fees is currently being drafted and will be forwarded to you
when completed.
I am requesting that the Committee of the Whole discuss this issue on January
12, 1989 and that a public hearing be held January 17th.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
etik,u,,J4.
Mayor
PD/SG
REQUEST TO CITY COUNCIL FOR A NEW GOLF COURSE FEE SCHEDULE
SUBJECT
Adoption of a new fee schedule to pay bonding ( $9 .5
. million) for the construction of Salt Lake City ' s two new golf
courses . Request a public hearing be held before adoption of
new fee schedule .
RECOMMENDATION
See attached fee schedule .
FUNDING
No funds requested. This is a fee increase request from
the Golf Enterprise Fund.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
In June 1988 , the Salt Lake City Council approved
construction of two new 18-hole golf courses . The bonding
costs will be $9 ,510 ,000 dollars amortized over a 10 year
period. To pay for the bonding and to continue paying for
operations and maintenance on the existing golf courses , it
was recommended by Finance that golf increase its revenue by
25% .
The 25% increase in the revenue will be largely made up
by an additional $1 .00 to existing green fee . It will go from
$5 .00 to $6 .00 for 9-holes .
A new green fee for seniors and juniors will be
implemented at $4 . 50 per 9-holes . The remainder of the 25%
increase will be made up by increases in driving range and golf
cart fees .
Last year the average cost per round of golf , to operate
and maintain the existing golf courses was $4 . 69 . Because of
the cost factors involved we feel we can offer a reduced fee
of $4 . 50 for seniors and juniors , but we are proposing the
elimination of all season passes and coupons .
The reason for eliminating the season pass and coupon is
because the gap between revenue earned from pass and coupon
sales and the cost of a round of golf is just too great a
disparity . The new fee structure narrows this disparity ,
however , seniors and juniors will still be allowed to play
below operating costs .
If the Council approves continuing the season pass , we
propose that the number of rounds played on that pass be
limited so the average cost per round to a pass player will
be approximately $4 . 50 .
LEGISLATIVE DOCUMENT
Pleae reference attached fee schedule , an ordinance is
currently being drafted and will be forwarded as soon
completed.
PERSON TO CONTACT
Scott Gardner , Recreation Director (972-7800)
SUBMITTED BY
John Gust , Parks Superintendent ( 972-7800)
PROPOSED NEW GOLF COURSE FEE SCHEDULE
GREEN FEES 9-HOLE 18-HOLE
Regular (except Mountain Dell Canyon) 6 .00 12 . 00
Regular - Mountain Dell Canyon NA 12 .00
Regular - Twilight Rate -Mtn. Dell Canyon NA 9.00
Regular - Evening Rate - Mtn. Dell Canyon 6 .00 NA
Junior/Senior (except Mtn. Dell Canyon-Airport) 4 .50 9 .00
Junior/Senior - Mountain Dell Canyon NA 9 .00
Junior/Senior - Airport 6 .00 12 .00
Junior/Senior-Twilight-Mtn. Dell Canyon NA 6 .75
Junior/Senior -Evening Rates - Mtn. Dell Canyon 4 .50 NA
School Team 3 .00 6 .00
(Junior is 17 and under - Senior is 65 or older. )
Discount is not available on weekends and holidays .
Must be State of Utah resident to receive discount .
CARTS
2 Bag 7 .00 14 .00
3 Bag 8 .00 16 .00
Private Cart - Trail Fee 2 .00 4 .00
(No private carts at Mtn. Dell when new courses open. )
RANGE
Small Basket 1 .50
Large Basket 3 .00
CONTRACT R01tIi\Fz FOR;;M . , y
DEG 20 1989 `P '
- 1 3 .,•
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS _ TRANSPORTATION r��iANCE DPP B
DEPARTMENTAL CONTACT: Between SLC Corp. & Utah Department of Transportatioon (UDOT)
SUBJECT: Cooperative Agreement for Guardrail Work
• SIGNATURE: c�� ^ „ „ n - /\
i YES I NO
Number of Executed
Documents Required: 15 Insurance Required
Expected Contract
Completion Date: Insurance Attached
Funds A'+aiiahle
Finarce Dep:.rtmelt
Date /.-20 —
Encumbefed 9 6 T ,
FINANCE COMMENTS: By _ !% ��- , t .
Account Number: D,,3_//f/o_Z35y
ATTORNEY COMMENTS: (Route to Larry Spendlove)
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Leke %ty Attorney's Ora RECEIVE D
Date / R.?"
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
DATE J-P-d()__.e"
RECORDER COMMENTS:
returned to W. Steve Meyer-Transportationon
(contact or dept. ) (date)
•
SALE"RAP(Jj CORPORATIONt
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
333 SOUTH 200 EAST, SUITE 201
PALMER DEFAULTS SALT LAKE CITY. UTAH 84111, JOSEPH R. ANDERSON
MAYOR _ PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
(801)T535-6630
December 9, 1988
Palmer DePaulis
Mayor of Salt Lake City
5th Floor - City Hall
RE: Cooperative Agreement between Utah Department of Transportation
(UDOT) and Salt Lake City Corporation for Repair of Guardrail
Dear Mayor DePaulis:
Attached is an agreement for review and approval for repair of guardrail . This has
been an annually renewable agreement and is identically worded, with the exception of
a slight increase in Line Guardrail , from $13.50/ft. to $14.50/ft. , and Approach
Element from $16,00/ft. to $17.00/ft. The agreement expires June 30, 1991, or upon
termination. This agreement allows UDOT to perform and charge for repair work of
City guardrail upon our request and within Public Works/Transportation budget
constraints. We use UDOT since the City does not have the equipment needed for this
type of work.
If this agreement meets with your approval please return to the Transportation
Division and they will make the desired copies for Council review.
Sincerely,
)4,04,04 a,.,41.Q.1"..41„v1N)
Joseph R. Anderson
Public Works Director
WSM/TPH/lh
cc: Timothy P. Harpst
1141
W. Steve Meyer , yvr-
J�r
sI
SALE' .' GITT 1RATION1
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
333 SOUTH 200 EAST, SUITE 201
PALMER DEPAULIS SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111. JOSEPH R. ASON
MAYOR - PUBLIC WORKSS DIRECTOR
_a.(801) :535-6630
TO: SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL DATE: DECEMBER 9, 1988
RE: Cooperative Agreement between Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and Salt
Lake City Corporation for guardrail work.
RECOMMENDATION: The Council approve the attached cooperative agreement between Utah
Department of Transportation and Salt Lake City Corporation for repair or replacement
of damaged guardrail .
AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: Funded within budget of Public Works Transportation Division .
DISCUSSION: This has been an annually renewable agreement. It replaces last years
agreement which has expired and is identically worded, with the exception of a slight
increase in Line Guardrail from $13.50/ft. to $14.50/ft. , and Approach Element from
$16.00/ft. to $17.00/ft. The agreement expires June 30, 1991, or upon termination .
This agreement allows UDOT to perform and charge for repair work to City guardrail upon
our request and within budget constraints. We use UDOT since the City does not have the
equipment needed for this type of work.
It is recommended the proposed cooperative agreement be approved for publication by the
City Recorder.
SUBMITTED BY: Joseph R. Anderson - Public Works Director
/lh
cc: Timothy P. Harpst1
RESOLUTION NO . OF 1988
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
AND
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WHEREAS , Title 11 , Chapter 13 , U . C . A . , 1953 , as amended , allows
public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint
undertakings and services ; and
WHEREAS , the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said
purposes ;
THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City ,
Utah :
1 . It does hereby approve the attached agreement generally
described as follows :
An agreement between the Utah Department of Transportation and
Salt Lake City Corporation wherein the Utah Department of
Transportation , in accordance with PPM 3 . 303 . 001 , agrees to
repair and replace guardrail upon request of Salt Lake City as
needed . This agreement will be in effect until June 30 , 1991 .
2 . Palmer A . DePaulis , Mayor of Salt Lake City , Utah is hereby
authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City
Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms .
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City , Utah , this day
of , 1988 .
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
BY :
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST :
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake ity Attorneys Office
CITY RECORDER Cate 0- Pk
9y
WSM/lh
SALT •
G reORORATION
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
333 SOUTH 200 EAST, SUITE 201
PALMER DEPAULIS SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 JOSEPH R. ANDERSON
MAYOR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
;(801) 535-6630
August 22 , 1988
Mr . Roger Cutler
City Attorney
5th Floor - City Hall
RE : SLC/UDOT Cooperative Agreement for Guardrail Work
Dear Roger :
In accordance with PPM 3 . 03 . 001 please review the attached cooperative
agreement between the City and Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT)
for the repair of guardrail .
This has been an annually renewable agreement . It replaces last year ' s
agreement which has expired and is identically worded , with the exception
of a slight increase in Line Guardrail , from $ 13 . 50/ ft . to $ 14 . 50/ ft . ,
and Approach Element from $ 16 . 00/ ft . to $ 17 . 00/ft . The agreement also
expires June 30 1991 , instead of the usual 1 year termination.
This agreement allows UDOT to perform and charge for repair work to City
guardrail upon our request . We use UDOT since the City does not have the
• equipment needed for this type of work.
Following your review, we will route the agreement for signatures .
Sincerely ,
Timothy P . Harpst , P . E .
City Transportation Engineer
TPH/ lh
cc : W . Steve Meyer
File
Form R-308
(Revised Jan. 1, 1916)
M-89-08
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Date August 12, 1988
We, the duly authorized officers of SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION hereby
County, City, Town, or Firm
approve the following work to be done and/or materials, labor, equipment, to be furnished by the Utah Department of
Transportation for which we agree to pay upon presentation of invoice for said work and/or materials, equipment, labor,
furnished as follows:
(Description of Work)
Repair or replace guardrail on Salt Lake City Streets as required by memo from Salt
Salt City Streets Department.
• (List of Materials)
— as needed — •
(List of Equipment)
As required to repair or replace guardrail.
In line guardrail — current average cost is estimated at $14.50 ft.
Approach element — current average cost is estimated at $17.00 ft.
(Labor Furnished)
Invoice will reflect actual cost incurred by the Utah Department of Transportation.
This Agreement expires June 30, 1991 or Approximate Total Cost
upon termination by either party. ; ?f
(County
Approved by: • //./(i, ;T� 2// -
District Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION (City
(Town APPROVED AS TO FORM
Self Lake
City Attorney's Office
(Firm Date /)-/ '
ByY7/
Fur,!. �y?ii;:;��
Title Fi�:r ?
Date /a—Zo-4
Encumbered
ATTEST: By
�, •
By
Title
Form R-308
(Revised Jan. 1. 1976)
•
M-89-08
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Date August 12, 1988
We, the duly authorized officers of SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION hereby
County, City, Town, or Firm
approve the following work to be done and/or materials, labor, equipment, to be furnished by the Utah Department of
Transportation for which we agree to pay upon presentation of invoice for said work and/or materials, equipment, labor,
furnished as follows:
(Description of Work)
Repair or replace guardrail on Salt Lake City Streets as required by memo from Salt
Salt City Streets Department.
(List of Materials)
— as needed —
(List of Equipment)
As required to repair or replace guardrail.
In line guardrail — current average cost is estimated at $14.50 ft.
Approach element — current average cost is estimated at $17.00 ft.
(Labor Furnished)
Invoice will reflect actual cost incurred by the Utah Department of Transportation.
This Agreement expires June 30, 1991 or Approximate Total Cost
upon termination by either party.
Approved by: J G C //,/( 9,
(County District Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION (City
(Town
(Firm
By
Title
ATTEST:
By
Title
Form R-308
(Revised Jan. 1, 1976) - -
M-89-08
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Date August 12, 1988
We, the duly authorized officers of SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION hereby
County, City, Town, or Firm
approve the following work to be done and/or materials, labor, equipment, to be furnished by the Utah Department of
Transportation for which we agree to pay upon presentation of invoice for said work and/or materials, equipment, labor,
furnished as follows:
(Description of Work)
Repair or replace guardrail on Salt Lake City Streets as required by memo from Salt
Salt City Streets Department.
(List of Materials)
— as needed —
(List of Equipment)
As required to repair or replace guardrail.
In line guardrail — current average cost is estimated at $14.50 ft.
Approach element — current average cost is estimated at $17.00 ft.
(Labor Furnished)
Invoice will reflect actual cost incurred by the Utah Department of Transportation.
This Agreement expires June 30, 1991 or Approximate Total Cost
upon termination by either party.
Approved by:d !1‘1•
(County District Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION (City
(Town
(Firm
By
Title
ATTEST:
By
Title
Form R-308
(Revised Jan. 1, 1976)
M-89-08
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Date August 12, 1988
We, the duly authorized officers of SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION hereby
County, City, Town, or Firm
approve the following work to be done and/or materials, labor, equipment, to be furnished by the Utah Department of
Transportation for which we agree to pay upon presentation of invoice for said work and/or materials, equipment, labor,
furnished as follows:
(Description of Work)
Repair or replace guardrail on Salt Lake City Streets as required by memo from Salt
Salt City Streets Department.
(List of Materials)
— as needed —
(List of Equipment)
As required to repair or replace guardrail.
In line guardrail - current average cost is estimated at $14.50 ft.
Approach element - current average cost is estimated at $17.00 ft.
(Labor Furnished)
Invoice will reflect actual cost incurred by the Utah Department of Transportation.
This Agreement expires June 30, 1991 or Approximate Total Cost
upon termination by either party.
Approved by;'r'!!�'%`�''1 C��//�ll�.ct. �J_1
(County District Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION (City
(Town
(Firm
By
Title
ATTEST:
By
Title
Form R-308
(Revised Jan. 1, 1976)
M-89-08
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Date August 12, 1988
We, the duly authorized officers of SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION hereby
County, City, Town. or Firm
approve the following work to be done and/or materials, labor, equipment, to be furnished by the Utah Department of
Transportation for which we agree to pay upon presentation of invoice for said work and/or materials, equipment, labor,
furnished as follows:
(Description of Work)
Repair or replace guardrail on Salt Lake City Streets as required by memo from Salt
Salt City Streets Department.
(List of Materials)
- as needed -
(List of Equipment)
As required to repair or replace guardrail.
In line guardrail - current average cost is estimated at $14.50 ft.
Approach element - current average cost is estimated at $17.00 ft.
(Labor Furnished)
Invoice will reflect actual cost incurred by the Utah Department of Transportation.
This Agreement expires June 30, 1991 or Approximate Total Cost
upon termination by either party.
Approved by. -? r
(County District Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION (City
(Town
(Firm
By
Title
ATTEST:
By
Title
Form R-308
(Revised Jan. 1, 1976)
M-89-08
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Date August 12, 1988
We, the duly authorized officers of SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION hereby
County, City, Town, or Firm
approve the following work to be done and/or materials, labor, equipment, to be furnished by the Utah Department of
Transportation for which we agree to pay upon presentation of invoice for said work and/or materials, equipment, labor,
furnished as follows:
(Description of Work)
Repair or replace guardrail on Salt Lake City Streets as required by memo from Salt
Salt City Streets Department.
(List of Materials)
— as needed —
(List of Equipment)
As required to repair or replace guardrail.
In line guardrail - current average cost is estimated at $14.50 ft.
Approach element - current average cost is estimated at $17.00 ft.
(Labor Furnished)
Invoice will reflect actual cost incurred by the Utah Department of Transportation.
This Agreement expires June 30, 1991 or Approximate Total Cost
upon termination by either party. 7/7:(1
21(_"
Approved by: ',t CGS .
(County District Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION (City
(Town
(Firm
By
Title
ATTEST:
By
Title
SALT LAKE QITY-CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DUANE E. FULLER Street Maintenance Division ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENTS
SUPERINTENDENT CRAIG POSSELLI
850 SOUTH 300 WEST PARVIZ ROKHVA
SALT LAKE CITY. UTAH 84101 GREG RICHARDS
(801) 535-6999
TO: Salt Lake City Council
REFERENCE: Resolution to execute a cooperative effort between the
State of Utah and Salt Lake City Corporation for street
sweeping.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the enclosed agreement as to
form and authorize Mayor Palmer A. DePaulis to execute the
Cooperative Agreement with the Utah State Department of
Transportation.
DISCUSSION: The Utah State Department of Transportation has requested
that Salt Lake City Corporation accomplish street sweeping
on their highways located within the incorporated limits
of Salt Lake City.
This particular agreement excludes sweepings if the Utah
State Department of Transportation has recently seal
coated, resurfaced or a major spill from a truck has
occurred. If a major spill has occurred it will be the
Utah State Department of Transportation's responsibility
to either request assistance from Salt Lake City or
accomplish the cleanup situation themselves.
The street sweeping on Utah State highways will be
required twice a year; once in early Spring and once in
late Fall.
Sweeping will be accomplished by Salt Lake City Street
Maintenance Department at the rate of $39.04 per curb or
island mile. The agreement will be from July 1 , 1988 to
June 30, 1989 and the estimated total cost is $8,000. All
work will be approved and inspected by Utah State
Department of Transportation upon completion.
CONTACT PERSON: Craig Posselli, Assistant Street Superintendent
SUBMITTED BY: Joseph R. Anderson, Public Works Director
CONTRACT ROUT I N G-. F q;;fi ht 1988
rINIAmC'F ill\/ICIfn'
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS/STREET MAINTENANCE DATE: 6/30/88
DEPARTMENTAL CONTACT: CRAIG POSSELLI
SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH UTAH STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SIGNATURE: i '�
YES NO
Number of Executed
Documents Required: 6 Insurance Required X
Expected Contract
Completion Date: 6/30/R9 Insurance Attached
— e17oo/ APPROVED
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
FUNDS NOT NEEDED
FINANCE COMMENTS:
•
Account Number:
ATTORNEY COMMENTS:
�s -cc y~ e. C C 1Y V E D
CITY ATTORNEY'S OPEC.,R
RECORDER COMMENTS:
returned to on
(contact or dept. ) (date)
RESOLUTION NO. OF 1988
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
AND
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13, U.C.A. , 1953, as amended,
allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to
provide joint undertakings and services; and
WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to
accomplish said purposes;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake
City, Utah:
1 . It does hereby approve the attached agreement generally
described as follows :
An agreement with UDOT whereby the City agrees to sweep
certain streets for which it will be paid by UDOT .
2 . Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah, is
hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt
Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms .
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this
day of , 1988 .
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
RLM:rc
COOPE..R;1 AuRF_E%1ENT
We, the duly authorized officers of the UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
hereby approve the following work to be done by the SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
for which we agree to pay upon presentation of invoice for said work as follows :
(Description of Work)
Street sweeping of all areas of Utah Department of Transportation
responsibility of highways as shown on attached sheet and within
the incorporated limits of Salt Lake City, but excluding sweeping
following Utah Department of Transportation resurfacing, seal coating,
and major spillages from trucks loosing their loads . The sweeping
will be required a minimum of twice , once in early Spring and again in
late Fall . Sweeping will be done by Salt Lake City Street Department
at the rate of $39.04 per curb mile or island mile.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION assumes all responsibility and/or liability of
claims arising from work performed and agrees to furnish and maintain their own
equipment and operators .
Upon completion SALT LAKE CITY STREET DEPARTMENT will notify the UTAH
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ' s District Two Maintenance Office for inspection
and approval of work.
Invoice is to be submitted upon completion of said sweeping, but not later than
June 30th of each year.
This Agreement is for a period from July 1 , 1988 to June 30, 1989 , at which
time it can be renewed if both parties agree.
Approximate Total Cost: $8.000.00
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION �.-
Recommended
By: - "District Director
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED:
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
City Recorder
By:
Director of Transportation
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
David L. Wilkinson, Attorney General
By:
By: Secretary date
Title: APPROVED: FINANCE COMMISSION
By:
•
Budget Officer
By:
0260R .Director; oft in'ance APPROVED
: FiNANCE DEPArr,-M': •-
�� ( Z+— ����_ FUNDO NOT NJ!'
A�7 � Y
M-89-01
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STREET CLEAN-UP
CURB/GUTTER ISLANDS
S.R. NO. NORTH-SOUTH STREETS MILES MILES
186 - 89 300 West - from 400 South to
2100 North Beck Street 7 .8 7.8
270 West Temple - 900 South to 400 South 1 .6 0.2
184 - 89 State Street and perimeter at Capitol - 9 .8 6.0
500 North to 2100 South
71 700 East - 400 South to 2800 South 7.2 7 .2
181 1300 East - 500 South to 3000 South 7 .4 2.6
186 Foothill Drive - 500 South & 1300 East
to I-80 8.4 7 .8
EAST-WEST STREETS
89 - 186 North Temple - State Street to 1700 West 4.0 1 .8
186 400 & 500 South - 300 West to 1300 East 5 .0 5.0
269 500 South - I-15 to State Street 1 .0
269 600 South - I-15 to State Street 1 .0
201 2100 South - I-15 to State Street 1 .8 1 .4
268 600 North - 300 West to 800 West 1 .4 1 .4
TOTALS 56.4 41 .2
0260R/2
El
LANDFILL BUDGET RATIFICATION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION BY: Cam Caldwell
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approval of 1989 City/County Landfill Budget
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City Council is asked to approve the 1989 annual
budget for the City/County Landfill. The budget year for the landfill is from -
January to December.
The landfill budget includes restricted reserves which are set aside for the
purchase of land. Operating cash has decreased from $1,343,587 to $281,668
since January 1, 1986. The amount restricted for restoration has grown from
$818,247 to $1,479,195 in that same period.
The County is proposing two new positions in the new budget. One position is
an office staff position to monitor and document tonnage, types of loads,
testing and other information. It has been recommended by an evaluation of
operations conducted by J. M. Montgomery Consultants. A second position is a
spotter to help with traffic. This second position is proposed by the County
because there is a rear entrance to the landfill which needs to be monitored
more closely. Brad Stewart, the City's representative on the Landfill Board,
has indicated that he is monitoring the need for this additional position and
is evaluating potential alternatives.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The 1989 proposed budget represents no
increased operating costs compared with the 1988 fiscal year budget. The
budget has not been increased partly because expenditures for module
excavation (to prepare additional land for dumping garbage) are not needed
this year. Funds typically used for excavation will be used for other site
improvements. No dumping fee increases are proposed for 1989. City
representative should continue to monitor operations to ensure that annual
landfill revenues meet annual operating and capital improvement costs. Future
increases in dumping fees may be needed to ensure that adequate cash is
available. Staff recommend adopting the 1989 fiscal year budget.
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: I move that we adopt the resolution approving the City
and County Landfill Budget for 1989.
ANTICIPATED OPPOSITION: No opposition is anticipated.
l� T ROUTING FORM
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: S DATE: 12 _ 17,
riK
DEPARTMENTAL CONTACT: Zj2, J)
SUBJECT: C /courry LA^1 f TLt_ (j cA 7G �T
SIGNATURE:
YES f NO
Number of Executed
Documents Required: 2 Insurance Required
Expected Contract
Completion Date: Insurance Attached
�3- Cgs/,7,-b
APPROVED
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
FUN S NOT NEEDED
FINANCE COMMENTS:
Account Number:
ATTORNEY COMMENTS:
CEIVE ['r
'�' %,i 1 RNEY'S Ot=FiCa
OAr .__...
RECORDER COMMENTS:
returned to on
(contact or dept. ) (date)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
JOSEPH R. ANDERSON 324 SOUTH STATE STREET PALMER DEPAULIS
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 MAYOR
535-7775
December 8, 1988
TO: Salt Lake City Council
RE: Salt Lake City/County Landfill Budget
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ratify the landfill budget.
AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: There will be no budget impact on Salt Lake City budget.
The landfill is funded 100 percent by user fees. There is no fee increase in
1989. A fee schedule is attached.
DISCUSSION: The landfill is jointly owned by the City and County. The County
has responsibility for operations and the City for engineering. The City and
County are paid for their services. Day to day operations are handled by the
landfill director. He reports to a five person board, the Salt Lake Valley
Solid Waste Management Council . All of the landfill council ' s administrative
decisions are subject to approval , modification, or veto by the county
commissioners and the Salt Lake City mayor, however, in the opinion of the Salt
Lake City attorney' s office, the City Council should approve by resolution the
landfill budget. The landfill is within city boundaries. Both the City and
County municiple refuse collection services pay the normal user fees.
Some adjustments in the 1989 budget are: no new module excavation is needed.
Funds typically used for new excavation will be put into efforts to improve the
site, prepare for new EPA regulations, and do future planning, such as final
closure and end use plans.
A staffing document is attached. In 1988 the landfill operated with 24 FTE'S.
This budget reflects a request for two new full-time positions. One position is
being recommended by an evaluation of operations done by J. M. Montgomery
Consultants. This person will be responsible for documenting activities
(tonnage, types of loads, testing, etc. ) An additional spotter to help with
traffic is also being considered.
The County commissioners have given tentative approval of the landfill budget.
Formal County adoption will occur December 15, 1988. Although this budget
document does not reflect salary adjustments, a 4% increase is expected. This
increase will cost the landfill about $30,000.
Current projections predict the landfill will service Salt Lake City and County
residents until the year 2010.
Submitted by:
(Ivj)AA4-10/L)
J eph . Anderson
Public Works Director
JRA:BDS:mf
SALT LAKE VALLEY LANDFILL
DISPOSAL FEES
Material Class Fgg
Commercial, Municipal, 01 $ 6.00/ton
Mixed Load, Lawn & Tree (2.00 min. charge)
Trimmings, Shredded Tires ,
etc.
Tires (non-shredded) 02 24.00/ton
(2.00 min. charge)
Concrete and Rock 03 1.50/ton
up to 12" diameter (2.00 min. charge)
Building Materials , Lumber, 04 6.00/ton
Sheetrock, Plaster, Lath, etc. (2.00 min. charge)
Special Handling 06 30.00/ton
Barrels (30.00 min. charge)
Non-Hazardous 07 24.00/ton
Industrial Waste (20.00 min. charge)
Liquid Sump Waste 08 8.40/ton
(20.00 min. charge)
Concrete and Rock 09 5.00/ton
over 12" diameter (2.00 min. charge)
Roofing 11 3.00/ton
Tear-off, pea gravel (2.00 min. charge)
Asbestos 15 250.00/ton
(10.00 min. charge)
Animal Carcasses 16 12.00/ton
(2.00 min. charge)
cjaan Fill (Soil) 00 No Charge
Private Citizen Loads: - EXTRA LARGE LOADS ARE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL CHARGE -
Cars 1.00/load
(1.00 min. charge)
Pickup Trucks 2.00/load
(2.00 min. charge)
Small Trailers 2.00/load
Single Axle (2.00 min. charge)
D2/SW511 01/l4i88
RESOLUTION NO. OF 1989
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY AND
COUNTY LANDFILL BUDGET FOR 1989
WHEREAS, on January 10, 1979, the City entered into an
Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with Salt Lake County and Salt
Lake County Special District No. 1 for the solid waste management
and disposal services to their citizens, as amended; and
WHEREAS, said Agreement provided that the operation would
be owned jointly by the City and the County, but that the County
would operate the landfill; and
WHEREAS, by said Agreement, the County is required to
submit its annual budget for the City' s approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt
Lake City, Utah, as follows:
SECTION 1 . The budget for the operation of the City and
County Landfill has been reviewed and is hereby approved.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this
day of , 1989.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
APPROVED
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
FUNDS NOT NEEDED •- ..t
Approved by the Mayor this day of , 1988.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
RLM:rc
_5=Hov-88 F(RNt,,,i n
SALT LAKE COUNTY PUBLIC MKS RFrPR7Fn
CASH BALANCE STATUS SUMMARY'
,
SOLID WASTE i:4 211WT 540-4750 'EC 7 1988
AS CF. 10/31/178S
fffffff*M1.1 fftfff+ff.fffffffftft,tsfff.*!Thffffffffftffffffffffftffttfftfffffttfffffftffffffffffftfffffftftfffffffffffftfftffffffffffffffft!
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED ACTUAL YTD ESTItMATED REQUESTED EUDGET PUBLIC WORKS
1985 1986 1987 1988 1988 _.._. ..._.._._1988 1989—
fttftttfffttffffffftfttftffffftffftftttfttftftfMtff*tffffftffttftftfttffftftfffttfffffffftfffffffffttfffffffffffffffffffffttffff}ffftffttfif
REVENUES:
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
LANDFILL FEES $2.858,555.74 $3,338,413.55 $3,699,359.13 $3,500,000.00 $2,910,315.61 $3,526,192.00 $3,560,000.00
INTEREST INCOME $206,313.64 $177,401.35 $136,913.18 $125,000.00 $153,529.27 S18b,500.04 $150,000.00
INTEFU'Ut1D CHARGES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00
OTHER PEVENUEE
REFUNDS-OTHER $37,614.82 $2,363.31 ($1,963.31) $10,000.00 $298.95 $993.00 $1,000.00
OTHER SU DRY RECEIPTS $55,714.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
SALE-MTL/SUP $0.00 $10,251.67 $300.00 $0.00 $1,696.56 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
TRAITS FROM FESRICTED CASH $0.00 $228,545.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE $33,333.82 $241,160.33 ($1,663.31) $10,000.00 $1,995.51 $2,993.00 $3,000.00
TOTAL FEV� EI $3,158,203.20 $3,758,975.63 $3,834,609.00 $3,635,000.00 $3,065,840.39 $3,715,685.00 $3,728,000.00
EXPENDITURES:
SALARIES $612,237.20 $688,776.18 $702,197.05 $789,514.00 $605,563.13 $741,496.08 $844,807.00
SERVICES $766,784.73 $1,883,920.25 $2,007,342.32 $1,862,150.00 $962,154.06 $1,800,527.56 $1,394,768.00
SPECIAL EXPENSES $80,771.15 $65,118.75 $63,363.80 $138,297.00 $114,370.00 $137,747.00 $138,327.00
CAPITAL EXPENDITLFES $33,622.94 $195,089.89 ($151,591.28) $700.00 $442,654.10 $0.00 $700.00
IHfERFUIZ CHARGES $44,488.50 $41,696.00 $35,301.20 $28,576.00 $18,010.00 $28,576.00 $30,200.00
DEPRECIATION $427,322.00 $341,534.96 $393,237.48 $392,504.00 $272,072.45 $393,203.18 $440,000.00
INTEREST EXPENSE AND
FISCAL CHARGES $170,733.84 $131,584.42 $70,737.20 $51,000.00 $0.00 $51,000.00 $30,000.00
TOTAL EXPEUOI11 ES $2,136,160.36 $3,347,720.65 $3,120,587.77 $3,262,731.00 $2,414,823.74 $3,152,549.82 $2,878,802.00
BUDGETARY NET INCDNE $1,022,042.84 $411,254.98 $714,021.23 $372,269.00 $651,016.65 $563,135.18 $849,178.00
(INN CASH ADJUSTMENTS FOR ITEMS
25-Nov-88 rur+DSTAT
SALT LAKE CaJNTY PUBLIC WOWS
._
CASH PLATE STATUS SUMMARY
SOLID WASTE YAMn;Gt4(T 540-4750
AS OF 10/31/1938 ---.._..._ .....__.. .
ffff+}ffff{fffffff.fffffffffffffffffff}ff}}fff{14M-#}ffff}}}{{{{ffffffffff{}{{}}}}}{f#fffffffff}}#}{ffffffffffffffffffffffffffff.ffffffff!
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTL BUDGETED ACTUAL YTD ESTIMATED REQUESTED . GET
1585 1986 1987 1988 1988 1928 1989
HUH ffffffff{f{{f{{}ffff{ffff{}{{f{{{}{}{{{{}f}{}{{}{IIII}}{}}{{{}}H}{{}}{}}}}{{{}{}}}{{}}}fH{}}}}}}}}{}}}f{IIHRIEf{ff{}{{}{}ffff;}}}}f}f
NOT AFFECTING CASH IN PERIOD
CURRENT YEAR ENCUMBREIItES $86,557.10 $430,778.31 $264,979.47 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
DEPRECIATION $427,322.00 $341,534.96 $393,237.48 $392,504.00 $272,072.45 $393,203.18 $440,000.00
GAIN ON SALE OF ASSETS $56,425.61 ($10,695.911 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,592,347.55 $1,172,872,28 $1,372,238.18 $764,773.00 $923,089.10 $956,338.36 $1,289,198.00
ASSET PAYMENTS
LAND $30,700.00 $0.00 $2,303.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,134,000.00
IMPROVMENTS OF GROUNDS $106,865.56 $0.00 $27,822.00 $2,100.00 $0.00 $2,100.00 $57,000.00
FETES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 _ .$0.00 . .... $0.00---- _ $0.00 $9,000.00
IhtPROVMENTS OF BUILDINGS $5,574.14 $1,327.97 $0.00 $2,700.00 $0.00 $2,700.00 $9,300.00
CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS $5,306.05 $202,766.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
OFFICE EQUIPMENT $4,875.79 $14,467.70 $16,403:78 $1;200: - __.._..__..$5:00.__-$1,200-.00 $11,920:00
AUTOS & TRUCKS $20,167.07 $13,543.72 $0.00 $15,600.00 $0.00 $15,600.00 $97,450.00
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $52,606.00 $499,122.91 $487,020.00 $448,240.00 $0.00 $448,240.00 $583,525.00
TOTAL ASSET PAYMENTS $286,094.61 $731,229.05 $533,548.78 $469,840.00 $0.00 $469,840.00 $1,901,195.00
DEBT PAYMENTS -
PRIOR YEAR ENCLtIBMICES $93,977.37 $66,121.10 $331,924.39 $323,572.19 $0.00 $323,559.67 $0.00
CAPITN_ LEASE PAYMENTS $179,919.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
185 ACRE-1580 . _ ._ -61,398.32. - $61,5538:15-$74;191-97--€8f721717 $0 C $81,721A7 $89;893.28
100 ACRE-1984 $282,633.33 $282,833.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
CITY/CO(R{TY EQUIFtfl{T-1979 $0.00 $150,797.90 $322,998.92 $161,372.67 $74,648.56 $161,372.14 $31,287.04
LAND PAYMENTS PURCHASE--1989- - -$0:00 - _.-._$0.00 $0.-0). 0:00 $0.00 0:00-------$0-00-
NOTES PAYABLE ADDITIONS ($666,456.00) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($808,778.28)
TOTAL DEBT PAYMI:TT{TS -- -.. _.{$48;327:98)--45567;290:49. $729;215.-28-----$566;666:03 $74-,648:5-$`.,66;652:98----.-($687;597:96)
CASH TO DESIGNATED (RESER4'ED)
FRIVATE CITIIEN LOADS -. . .. $217,506.46._.-..$209,122:17- --$20 871-84--- $2fb, - $0:00---$2I0,000_00-- --$21P00-.t0-
INSURANNCE RESERVE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $27,400.00
25-Nov-88 r,,.. AT
SALT LAYE.000NTY PUBLIC WORKS - .. . ._. ._._ ._
CASH BALANCE STATUS SUMMARY
SOLID WASTE MAt>AG 24T 540-4750
AS OF 10/31/1988 .-
ffffttffflfiflt.ftttfftfff*OY: flftfffffftflfitffttfftffEfffftlltffttflffftlfffffffftffflllfffffffEffffFEtfflit*O-H fftftttft.fftttttttfffft}1
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED ACTUAL YTD ESTIMATED REQUESTED BU00ET
1985 1986 1987 1988 - - "1988' 19:4: 1989
EEEfffEEtH*}}}}}}}}El-ElEl ff}}FfH itfff}flIEftffftftIttlfffttIIFtffffEttfEflf}FffEffff}f}ffffF}ffffEfffff}ffft}EEE}lMIff}}{}}}}}tt}}}t}}}}f
CLOSURE RESERVE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,100.00
TOTAL CASH TO DESIGNATED $217,506.46 $203,122.19 $208,871.84 $210,000.00 $0.00 $210,000.00 $260,500.00
OPERATIONS CASH CHANGE $1,137,074.46 ($334,769.45) ($99,337.72) ($481',733.03)' 4849,440.54 ($290,154.62) ($184,899.04)
OTHER CHANGES TO CASH DO TO
FRIOR YEARS ACTIONS _
ACCOUNTS RECIE'VAKE $54,621.65 ($18,177.30) ($83,990.45) $0.00 $0.00 $66,655.24 $0.00
COMPENSATED ABSEKES $4,701.88 ($191.13) ($141.29) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $6,815.23 $497,078.16 ($440,975:66) .. '($56,862.64) . $0.00 ($56,862.64) $0.00-
ACCRUED PAYROLL PAYABLE $3,827.60 $1,649.33 $3,820.43 $4,645.19 $0.00 $4,645.19 $0.00
ACCRUED EXPENSE PAYABLE ($17,977.35) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
ACCRUED INTEREST--1979 $125,683.08 ($124,900.17) ' '($982.91). . " 40.00 $0.00 $0.00 ' $0.00-
IMPERST ACCOUNT CHANGES $0.00 $0.00 ($325.00) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($500.00) $0.00
RETAIN EARRNING RESTATI9rE1f( ($327,901.57) . .. $0:00 _---._ $0:00- - ---- #0:00- .._. . $0.00..._ -$0.00 -. ... _$0..00-
CQ'4TRIBUTED CAPITAL ($668,456.00) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL OTHER CASH CHANGES-($818;485:481- -$355;45& 9-($52.;094:88r $5T217:45) #O:00- $13;437:79------10:00-
TOTAL UNDESIGNATED CASH CHANGE $318,588.98 $-20,689.44 ($621,492.60) ($ 3,950.48) $648,440.54 (#276,216.83) ($184,899.04)
BEGI)4NIUG UINDESIGNATED CASH $1,024,997.64 $1,343,586.62 $1,364,276.06 $742,783.46 $742,783.46 $742,783.46 $466,566.63
YEAR END U)4DESIGNATED CASH - --$1;343;586:&2-31;364;276:0&$742783 45- 95-#1 91";224:00 '#466;566763-122f;667:59-
DESIGNATED CASH
EE6INNING DESIGNATED.CASH-'---S600,73T,25-#^oI8;246:71-#772;823:`5-#1;00T,b9539- f,ZW695:39-11 001;795:39--#1;21T,69539-
ADDITIONS TO DESIGNATED CASH $217,509.46 $209,122.19 $208,871.84 $210,000.00 $0.00 1210,000.00 $260,500.00
REDUCTION TO DESIGNATED CASH $0.00 (4 8,545.35) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
ENDING DESIGNATED CASH $818,246.71 $798,623.55 $1,007,695.37 $1,217,695.39 $1,007,695.39 $1,217,695.39 $1,478,145.39
25-Noy-89 FU IAT
SALT LAKE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
CASH BALANCE STATUS R MtY
SOLID WASTE MAMAGi2{T 540-4750
AS OF 10/31/1988
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff.fffffffff#rfff
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED ACTUAL YTD ESTIMATED REQUESTED BUDGET
1785 1986 1987 1988 1788 1988 1989
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff.ffffffffff.ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff#ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
TOTAL CASH $2,161,833.33 $2,163,097.61 f1,7550,478.85 $1,426,528.37 $2,598,919.39 $1,684,262.02 $1,757,862.98
17-Nov-SS 8:45 IRFC'Ji\/FO PAGE 1
.. )EC 7 1988
SALT LAKE COUNTY
DETAIL LISTING OF THE REQUESTED EXPENSE BUDGET
BUDGET PREPARATION FOR BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 1989 PUBLIC Vn.Il.iZK*
FUND: 540 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AGENCY: 400 PUBLIC WORKS
ORGAN17.ATION: 4750 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
EST LAST 4 MOS CHANGES BETWEEN CURRENT
UNIT 1987 FIRST EIGHT PENDING ADDITIONAL TOTAL BUDGETED ANT REQUESTED AMT AND REQUESTED BUDGETS
OF ACTUAL MONTHS TRANSACTIONS EXPENDITURE'S 1988 FOR CURRENT FOR FISCAL
AF'PR OBJECT DESCRIPTION OBLIGATIONS 1933 AS OF 9-15-23 1983 ADJUSTED FISCAL YEAR YEAR 1989 AMOUNT PERCENT
,2 ,ROFESS I +�•i MANin :IA r 5� 2 752 72 4 , c ".
360 1 _. F ;�+-__„ t;�1,�,TECH,�„ n�^EF n 66,288.00 4,,,9.,�.Ol+ 2 ,97.5.00 62,920.00 b8, ,�� ,37+; ,938.00 .,.6
360 1130 PERMANENT AND PROVISIONAL 415,303.42 276,490.89 154,465.11 430,964.00 462,280 495,052 32,772 7.0.
360 1156 COMPENSATED ABSENCE (141.29) 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000 1,000 (1,000)
360 1160 TEMrOF:AR`( 34,228.62 16,161.69 21,596.31 37,758.00 45,200 35,000 (10,200) -22.571
360 1130 OVERTIME 39,752.02 34,518.40 10,482.00 45,000.40 45,000 45,000 0 0.00%
360 1210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES 39,969,16 27,411.05 16,345.97 43,757.02 46.734 48,657 1,923 4.11%
360 1230 RETIREMENT OR PENSION CONTRIB 46,311.28 31,401.78 20,441.23 51,643.06 62,848 73,303 10,460 16.64%
360 1235 SUP RETIREMENT 401K 9,774.14 7,508.70 0.00 7,502.70 0.00 0 0
360 1240 GROUP INSURANCE PREMIUMS 50,111.70 32,751.63 22,785.27 55.736.90 56,500 73,950 17,450 30.88%
360 SUBTOTAL 702,197.05 .472,404.14 0.00 269,091.94 741,496.02 789,514 644,807 55,293 7.00%
361 2110 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES P SERVICE 368.69 531.48 182.55 4,276.00 4,990.03 4,990 5,190 200 4.01%
361 2120 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 1,181.21 1,164.92 3,445.00 4,609.92 4,610 5,790 1,180 25.60%
361 2130 MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS 14,762.98 16,286.87 250.75 800.00 17,337.62 14,440 10,000 . (4,440) -30.757.
361 2140 MAINT OF PLUMBING,HEAT,E:AC 1,334.83 1,144.91 73.00 862.00 2,077.91 2,080 2,160' 80 3.85%
I 361 2215 CLOTHING PROVISIONS 893.63 . . .642.89 297.00 939.89 940 980 40 4.26% .
361 2310 SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 705.44 913.00 0.00 913.00 840 1,270 430 51.
361 2330 EDUCATION le TRAINING SERV/SUPP 27.00 49.00 50.00 99.00 310 322 12 3.8n
• •- 361 • 2383 DEVELOPMENT ADVERTISING . 0.00 . 100.00 0.00 100.00 50 50 0 0.00%
361 2410 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5,873.43 689.50 5.04 4,000.00 4,694.54 7,280 7,570 290 3.98Z
361 2412 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 3,483.05 4,156.58 686.25 457.00 5,299.83 5,300 4,490 (810) -15.287.
361 2419 SMALL EQUIPMENT (UNDER 500) 3,279.01 ._ 268.19 . 1,000.00 1,268.17 2,080 2,160 80 3.85%
361 2420 POSTAGE 517.06 348.64 175.00 523.64 520 540 20 3.85%
361 2430 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 874.92 179.44 550.00 729.44 730 760 30
361 2470 MAINTENANCE OF OFFICE EQUIP- . . . .1,264.23_____ 630.72. .. . ... 282.50... 1,000.00 1,913.22 3,120 3,000 (120) -3.85X.
361 2480 MAINT OF MACHINERY AND EQUIP 252,075.12 183,194.99 4,900.00 102,505,00 301,599.97 301,600 293,403 (8,197) -2.72X
361 2510 GASOLINE, DIESEL, OIL & GREASE 112,136.55 81,824.16 45,000.00 126,824.16 191,880 249,341 57,461 29.95%
361 2540 MAINTENANCE OF AUTOS & TRUCKS 66,042.40 53,439.57..-..-. 12,030.00 65,519.57 65,520 . 83,382 17,862 27.26%
361 2570 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 0.00 0.00 50,00 50.00 0 150 150 ERR
361 2520 TRANSPORTATION 12,341.29 14,423.29 1,000,00 15,423.29 13,520 14,060 540 3.99X
' 17-Nov-82 8:45 PAGE 2
SALT LAKE COUNTY
DETAIL LISTING OF THE REQUESTED EXPENSE BUDGET
BUDGET PREPARATION FOR BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 1939
FUND: 540 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AGENCY: 400 PUBLIC WORKS
c- WASTE DISPOSAL
ORGANIZATION: 4iJ�� SOLID tJHo(C D,o :SH-
- EST LAST 4 MOS CHANGES BETWEEN CURRENT
UNIT 1937 FIRST EIGHT PENDING ADDITIONAL TOTAL BUDGETED AMT REQUESTED AMT AND REQUESTED BUDGETS
OF ACTUAL MONTHS TRANSACTIONS EXPENDITURES 1988 FOR CURRENT FOR FISCAL
APPR OBJECT DESCRIPTION OBLIGATIONS 1988 AS OF 9-15-88 1988 ADJUSTED FISCAL YEAR YEAR 1989 AMOUNT PERCENT
361 2590 MOTOR POOL CHARGES 14.44 7.31 50.00 57,31 100 100 0 0.00"
•
• 361 2610 HEAT AND FUEL 1,974,68 1,698.11 1,700.00 3,398.11 6,240 4,000 (2,240) -35.9()..
361 2620 LIGHT AND POWER 31,190.11 4,807.95 2,472.00 7,279.95 7,280 7,570 290 3.93X
361 2630 WATER AND SEWER 3,329.35 1.743.73 411.00 1.080.00 3,234.73 2,080 3,800 1,720 82.69%
361 2640 TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH 6,776.24 7,176.14 3,600.00 10,736.14 7,280 11,250 3,970 54.53%
361 2740 MAINTENA„CE OF STREAMS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
361 2770 MAINTENANCE OF ROADS 6 STREETS 109,549 '96 135,863.67 5,536.00 141,399.67 141,400 115,500 (25,900) -18.32%
• 361 2830 RENT OF EQUIPMENT 8,140.60 360.00 0.00 350.00 10,400 10,820 420 4.04%
351 2930 OTHER PROFESSIONAL FEES 40,737.57 650.00 200,00 158,530.00 159,480.00 159,480 508,000 343,520 218.54%
• 361 2940 CONTRACTED LABOR 38,473.22 77.345,47 3.521.28 8,000.00 44,856.75 33,280 46,510 13,330 40.05%
361- • 3410 SHOP,CREW,1•DEPUT'i SMALL TOOLS 1,654.04 1,133.72 50.00 1,216,00 2,399.92 2,400 2,500 100 4.17%
• 361 3830 EXCAVATION LAND FILL '.283.095.05 306,751.74 555,548.00 872,399.74 872,400 0 (872,400) -100.007.
361 SUBTOTAL 2,007,342.32 55. ,535.19 10,552.37 931,427.00 1,800,527,55 1,852,150 1.394,758 (467,382) -25.107.
364 6110 INSURANCE EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 i 0 ERR
354 6320 INTEREST EXPENSE 70,737.20 0.00 51,000.00 51,000.00 51,000 30,000 (21,000) -41.18L
•
364/ 6420 INDIRECT COSTS 62,701.00 S0,057.00 11,439.00 45,749.00 137,247.00 137,247 137,247 0 0.0(
354 6520 SPECIAL CLAIMS 662.30 0.00 500.00 500.00 1,040 1,080 40 3.857..
364 6580 DEPRECIATION 333,237.48 191,327.18 201,875.00 393,203.18 393,204 440,000 46,796
354 5590 LOSS ON SALE OF ASSET 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
364 SUBTOTAL 527,333.48 271,396.18 11,439.00 299,125.00 581,950.18 582,491 508,327 25,836 4.44%
365 7110 PURCHASE OF LAND 2,303,00 0.00 0.00 0 100 100
365 7140 IMPROVEMENTS OF GROUNDS • (161,850.98) 7,828.00 (7,828.00) 0.00 0 100 100 ERR
355 7150 FENCES 2,264.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 100 100 ERR
365 7220 IMPROVEMENTS OF BUILDINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 100 100 ERR
365 - .7310 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 0.00 0.00 0.00 • 0 0
365 7410 OFFICE FURN, FIXTURES & EQUIP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 100 100 ERR
365 7420 AUTOS & TRUCKS 14,007.00 (1,008.00) 1,008.00 0.00 0 100 100 ERR
• 17-ir.:,v-88 .. 1,5 PAGE 3
SALT LAKE COUNTY
DETAIL LISTING OF THE REQUESTED EXPENSE BUDGET
BUDGET PREPARAATT.ION FOR BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 1989
FUND: 540 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AGENCY: 400 PUBLIC WORKS
ORGANIZATION: 4750 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
EST LAST 4 MOS CHANGES BETWEEN CURRENT
UNIT 1937 FIRST EIGHT PENDING ADDITIONAL TOTAL BUDGETED AMT REQUESTED AMT AND REQUESTED BUDGETS
OF ACTUAL MONTHS TRANSACTIONS EXPENDITURES 1988 FOR CURRENT FOR FISCAL
APPR OBJECT DESCRIPTION OBLIGATIONS i983 AS OF 3-15-88 1988 ADJUSTED FISCAL YEAR YEAR 1989 AMOUNT PERCENT
365 7430 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT (6.012.20) 442,338.10 (448,338.10) 0.00 0 100 100 ERR
365 SUBTOTAL ;149.283.28) 455,158.10 0.00 (455,158.10) 0.00 0 700 700 ERR
366 9120 INTERGOVERNMENTAL CHARGES 35, M 20 13,J10,00 1,250.00 9,316.00 28,576.00 28,576 30,200 1,624 5,68%
366 SUBTOTAL 35.301.20 12.010.00 1,250.00 9,316.00 28,576.00 28,576 30,200 1,624 5.68%
3,122,890.77 2,075,494.61 23,251.37 1,053,803.34 3,152,549.82 3,262,731 2,878,802 (383,929) -11.77X
. ' 28-Sep-88
SALT LAKE COUNTY
DETAIL LISTING OF THE REVENUE
BUDGET`PREPARATIDN-FOR-BUDGET-FISCAL-YEAR-1989 -
-
FUND: 540 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AGENCY: 400 PUBLIC WORKS
ORGANIZATION: 4750 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
EST-UST#MOS .. CHANGES-BETWEEN-EURRENT
REV 1987 °` FIRST EIGHT PENDING,;;': "::ADDITIONAL TOTAL: PROJECTED PROJECTED AND PROJECTED REVENUES
MONTHS; REVENUES:. REVENUES 1988 FOR CURRENT FOR FISCAL
. - ------- ---------
NIIMBEKSOURCE ACTUAL .QESCRIPTI'N REVENUE 1988 AS-0E-4=15=88-- '1988 ADJUSTED-FISCAI'1'EAR-YEAR-1984 AMDUHf--PERCENT
6 3411 INTEREST 136,913.18 107,706.90 - 78,793.00 186,499.90 125,000 150,000 25,000 20.001
—
CAT 40 USE MON Z< PROP 136,913.18 107,706.90 0.00 78,793.00 186,499.90 125,000 150,000 25,000 20.00%
i— 3786-CANDFItL CHARGES- 3;699;359;13---2726i098-13--- -4265;094;00-- 35524192:13- 3;500,000- ---'3,560;000--- -----60;000---1771X
CAT 70 CURR SVC 3,699,359.13 2,261,098.13 0.00 1,265,094.00 3,526,192.13 3,500,000 3,560,000 60,000 1.71Z
3810 REFUNDS-OTHER (1,963.31) (7.05) 1,000.00 992.95 10,000 1,000 (9,000) -90.001
3825 SALE FIXED ASSESTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 ERR
_..- -
-3826"GAIN/t05S -300;00--17696:56- 303.-44--- - -2I000:00 - --- -0 - - - 2,000-------2;000-----ERR--
3999 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0,00 3,800,000 (3,800,000) -100.00Z
--- -CAT 80-OTHER'REV----- -(4663:31Y- -1;689;51---- --0;00----1;303.44-- -- - 2,992.95 -3,810,000 3,000 -- -(3,607)000) --99.92X
XXXX INTERFUND - SANITATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15,000 15,000 ERR
CAT 90 INTERFUND TRANS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15,000 15,000 ERR
.. . .. . ...
ORGANIZATION TOTAL 3,834,609.00 2,370,494,54 0.00 1,345,190.44 3,715,684.98 7,435,000 3,728,000 (3,707,000) -49.861
3,728,000
(
t
•
.... ....... „ -.... .. :..Y.......... ..,ram_.... _ ... .. .. .. ... i:l:r...... .. J' �. Y.. ...
SaltLakeCounty
SCHEDULE 1tSV-101
(Drs. SOLID WASTE ANALYSIS OF REVENUE
No. 4 750 Licenses and Permits,Fines,Rents,Charges Current Services Page 1 of 1-
1969 PROJECTED REVENUE
Sub 1968
RevenSource Rcvcaue DESCR1FIONOFREVENUES REVENUE ESTIhIATED Descriptiatof Projected Revenue per COMMENTS
Source REVENUE Standard Units Standard Standard
TOTAL
Units Unit
3411 Interest 136,913 186,500 150,000
3786 Landfill service charge 3,699,3553,526,192 3+560,000
3810 Refunds other (1,963)r 993 1,000
pp 3826 Gain/loss FA 300 2,000 2,000
—
sRsisn Interfund-Sanitation -0- -0
A 15,000
•
3,334,609 3,715,605
TOTALS 1 , s s 3,728,000
•
Prepared Dy Larry E. Moller dale 10/-/3-88 - �V,1'(/
Approved date
S.a.on n..4
Approved date
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP-101 •
ANALYSIS OF SALARY AND WAGES SHEET•1
SUMMARY
ORGANIZATION SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL No. 4750
1989 SALARY EXPENSE 1988 1987
EXISTING JOD ALLOC. NEW ALLOCATIONS •
PROJECTED ACTUAL
SALARY SALARY
FROM EXP-101 SIIEETS REQUESTED FROM RECLASSIFICATIONS TOTAL EXPENSE EXPENSE
ACCT. EXP101 SHEET 11 REQUESTED FROM
ILO• NO.EQUIVALENT NO.EOUIVALENT EXP101 SHEET 12 NO.EQUIVALENT NO.EQUIVALENT NO.EQUIVALENT
FULL-TIME FULL-TIME FULL-TIME FULL-TIME FULL-TIME
. ALLOC. ALLOC. ALLOC. ALLOC. ALLOC.
II10 S S S S =
•
1120 72,840 2.00 77.840 2.00 68.928 , 2.00 , 66.288 2-.00
1130 463,144 24.00 31,908 2.00 495,052 26.00 430,964 24.00 415,903 25.61
1140 •
1150
.
1160 35,000 3.50 35,000 3.50 37,758 2.62 .34,229 2.73
1170 -
SUIT
TOTAL $ 570,984� 29.50 $ 31,908 2.00 S S 602,892 , 31.50 537,650 / 28.62 $ 516,420 , 30.34
/ _ / -
1180 OVERTIME (ASSUME AT TIME AND A HALF)—FROM EXP-101 SHEETS $ 45,000 $ 45,000 - $ 39,752 .
v.+ y3t`.¢"k• i. ••• -Y S:.,c - it .x-i.,�Yo, ��tc:9 iY..t� tea.,r- r Yc zv •
a. t i - ..
.c32y Par•'Z. ,' �trP ajt. 3r}{V is 1' k^l�"• .s r' , . r•• 7 • • • • • ..
Y ,
. �F _t1rC?'..4..._ .»5'.ty_. �_.2Ti.:tr. .�-,s, ,r,:...A ,-arn'�;. 5�..t:;...-._,,...r . . ..•- . / / '
GRAND TOTAL $ 647,892 , 31.50 $ 582,650 , 28.62 $ 556,172 , 30.34
OVERTIME JUSTIFICATION(DESCRIBE NATURE OF WORK DONE AND PEAK PERIODS DURING THE YEAR):
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP•101
ANALYSIS OF SALARY AND WAGES SHEET 11
• 1989 NEW JOB ALLOCATIONS REQUESTED PAGE J_OF_L-
OITCANIZATION SOLID WASTE • NO. 4750
(I) (2). (3) (0) (5) • (0) (4) (8) (91 (ID)
()ATE IS JOB PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED EOUIY. ALLOC.
ACCI. OF FUNDED SEMI-MONIIILY COST OF 1989. FULL-TIME • APPROVED
NU. JOB 1110E IIIfE DY GRANT? STARTING MERIT RAISE SALARY ALLOC. JUSTIFICATION DY
SALARY COMMSRS.
1130 Disposal Site Spotter 1-1-89 NO $ 506 $ 360 $ 12,504 1.00 Safty and Traffic control in preventing
nnnn-pAyin3 pnhlir from nAtnring rhn Aio-
posal facility.
31TcTMaste Ylanner
:130 Techincian 19 1-1-89 NO 785 564 19,404 1.00 Will help in the planning for the future
roriulP ronstrurtion of the dispnaal of
solid waste. Prepare reports and track
• the daily'plarement of Solid waste ncitt<
•
• computer graphics.
These position were recommended in the
piontgonory stndy.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
924 31,908 2,00
'ENTER ACCOUNT TOTALS OF COLUMNS 7 AND 8 ON EXP-101 SHEET 1
•
16-Nov-OS PAGE 1 PAYROLL
6NL02101 SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP-10I
SALARY 5 WAGES
DEPARTMENT 4750 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 1354
-1988 vv 1
(11 (2) (3) (41 (5) (61 (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (121 (131 (14) 11 (15) (16) (171 (181 (19) (201 (21) (22) (23) l
SEMI- SALAAR'i LAST 4 LAST 4 CORRECTED 1988 1988 1-1/6-30 7-1/12-31 TOTAL EO FUL11 1989 PROJCTD 1989 CORRECTED 1989 1989 1-1/6-30 7-1/12-31 TOTAL ED
EMPLOYEE MONTH HOUR TNRU MONTHS MONTHS PROJECTED SOC SEC YETIREMT GRP INS 6RP INS SAL/BEN ALLOC 11 PAY 1989 ADJUSTMTS 1989 AT SOC SEC RETIREMT GRP INS GRP INS SAL/BEN AL
ACV NAME RATE RATE 9i3(/83 OF 82 CORRECTI9BB TOTAL 1210 1230 1240 1240 1988 1988 11 RATE TOTAL CURB RATE 1210 1230 1240 1240 1787 I
11
1120 BAUER; DANIEL 1,639 18.839 26,224 13,112 39.226 1 2.954 4,406 17 1,236 17 1,440 1 49,372 1.00 II 1,639 1 39,336 IS 3,912 1 43,248 I 3,248 II 4.844 17 1,440 17 1,440 I 54,220 I 1
1120 STANFORD, BUD L. 1,233 14,172 19,728 9,864 29,592 1 2,222 11 5,314 I7 1,236 17 1,440 1 37,805 1 1.00 11 1,233 1 29,592 I 29,592 1 2,222 11 3,314 17 1,440 17 1,440 1 38,009 1 1
11
1 „
1 „
,I
•
1 11
ACCOUNT TOTAL 45,952 22,976 69,92S 5,176 ! 7,720 1 2,472 I 2,880 I 87,176 2.00 I1 1 68,928 I 3,912 1 72,840 1 5,470 1 8,158 1 2,880 1 2,880 1 .-92,228 1 2
68,920 87,176 92,228
-hc,y-S8 RASE . ,,ROLL
GNLD2101 SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP-101
SALARY 6 OASES
DEPARTMENT 4750 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 1354
-1988 '.
_ ._- . _. _ -1489tr
1) (21 (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (7) (101 (111 (12) (13) (14) 11 (151 (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (241 11
SEMI- SALARY LAST 4 LAST 4 CORRECTED 1566 1988 1-1/6-30 7-1/12-31 TOTAL EQ FULUI 1989 PROJCTD 1989 CORRECTED 1989 1989 1-1/6-30 7-1/12-31 TOTAL EQ FUL11
• -----EMPLOYEE----MONTH-HOUR-•--THRU--MONTHS----MONTHS•PROJECTED -SOC SEC,- RETIREMT ORP INS GRP INS SAL/BEN ALLOC 11 PAY - 1989 ADJUSTMTS 1989 AT SOC SEC RETIREMT GRP 1NS-ERP_.1NS SAL/BEN__.L113C_LL
:CT NAME RATE RATE 8/31/88 OF BB CORRECT1988 TOTAL 1210 1230 •1240 1240 1988 1988 11 RATE TOTAL CURB RATE 1210 1230 1240 1240 1989 1989 11
11 11
130 BAUHS, CHERYLL--- 615 7.069-• . .0 • • 0 HT 1;845 1,845 I • 139 12. 196 I 0 10 2,179 1 I
130 BOGGESS, BRUCE 773 8,943 777 777 1 53 11 37 1 206 : 0 1 1.128 1 I1 1 0 1 0 1 0 11 0 1 O 1 0 I 0 1 11
;30 BYINGTON, STE'JEN 1,008 11.586 13,813 8,064 21,877 1 1.643 '2 2,319 17 1,236 17 1,440 1 28,515 1 1.00 I1 1,008 1 24,192 1 24,192 1 1,817 12 2,564 17 1,440 17 1,440 1 31,453 1.00 lI
130 CHILDEP.9,-JR;•JO 1,052 12.092 15,345 8.415 23,761 1 1,784 12 2,519 17 1,236 17 1,440 1 30,740 1 1.00 1I 1,052 1 25,248 I 25,248 1 1,896 12 2,676 17 1,440 :7 1,440 1 .32,700_1.1.00 11
.30 DANSERFIELD, NAN 506 5.816 2,794 2,794 1 210 12 296 15 924 15 924 5,148 1 11 1 0 1 0 1 0 12 0 15 924 15 924 1 1440 1 „
:30 DANSERFIELD, NAN 558 64.14 5,476 4,464 P 287 10.227 1 768 12 1,084 :5 924 15 924 1 13,927 1 1.00 11 599 1 14,376 I 14,376 1 1,080 12 1,524 15 924 15 924 18,92' 1,^"
30 DAVIES, DANIEL R 592 6.805 9,471. 4,736 . 14,207 1 1.067 12 1,506 ;7 1.236 17 1,440 1 19,456 1 1.00 11 592 1 14,208 1 1 14,208 1 1,067 :2 1,506 17 1,440 17 1,440 1 19,661 1.
.30 DEAN, BRADLEY K. 592 6,805 9,122 4,736 13,853 1 1,041 12 1,469 17 1,236 17 1,440 1 19,044 1 1.00 I1 592 1 14,208 1 14,208 1 1,067 12 1,506 17 1,440 17 1,440 1 19,661 1 1.0u 11
30 DEDMAN, CARL D. 835 10.720 13,289 7,080 1:.769 !: 2,281 17 1.236 17 1,440 1 26,856 1 1.00 :1 885 1 21,240 1 21,240 1 1,595 I1 2,379 17 1,440 17 1,440 1 28,094 1 1.00 11
30 DERBIDGE, PAMELA 615 7.069 H 1,341 1,342 1 ;01 12 142 1 0 1 0 1 1.585 1 1.00 11. 615 I- 14,760 IP 444 1 15.204 1 1,142 12 1,612 17 1,440 17 1,440 1 20,837 1 1.00 1I
30 HANSEN, KIH L. 526 6,046 789 4,208 4.997 1 375 12 530 1 0 1 376 1 6,218 1 1.00 11 526 1 12,624 PC 936 1 13,560 1 1,018 12 1,437 1 376 1 376 1 16,768 1 1.00 11
30 HINCKS. 'JALDEE G 506 5.216 2.50 4,048 P 30 6.585 1 495 12 698 1 0 1 1.320 1 9,098 1 1.00 11 536 1 12,864 1 12,864 1 966 12 1,364 1 1,320 1 1,320 1 17,834 1 1.00 (1
30 HOWELL, BRYNN 537 6.172 7.569 4,256 T (3,810) 8,G55 1 605 1 654 1 0 ; 0 I 9,514 1 ii 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 O 1 . . ..0_...
.30 JACKSON. JACQUEL 506 5.816 4,733 4,048 P 150 8.931 1 671 12 947 1 0 15 924 1 11,472 1 1.00 11 536 I 12,864 ICP 313 1 13,777 1 1.035 1.460 1 0 15 924 1 17,196 1 1.00 I1
30 KAIHE. JOSEPH E. 1.052 12.092 15,816 9.416 24,232 1 1,820 11 2,714 17 1,236 17 1,440 1 31,442 1 1.00 11 1,052 1 25,248 1 25,248 1 1,896 11 2,828 11 1,440 17 1,440 1 32,852 1 1.00 11
;30 KENDALL, JEFF • 526 6.046 8,356 4.203 12,564 1 444 12 1.332 17 1.236 17 1,440 1 17,515 1 1.00 11 526 1 12,624 1 12,624 1 948 12 1,338 17 1,440 17 1,440 1 17,790.1 1.00 11
30 KEYES, CLARENCE 1.218 14.000 18,92B 9,744 28,672 1 2,153 12 3,037 15 524 15 924 1 35,712 1 1.00 11 1,218 1 29,232 1 29,232 1 2,195 12 3,099 15 524 15 924 1 36,374 1 1.00 1,
•30 KORENKO, LEONARD 1003 11.529 11.909 8.024 14,933 1 1•4;7 11 2.232 15 924 15 924 1 25,510 1 1.00 1, 1003 : 24,072 IR 1,307 1 25,379 1 1,906 11 2,842 15 924 15 924 1 31,975 1 1.00 1.
30 KOMP, GEOR6E A. 740 8.506 9.432 5.9.1i- 15.350 1 1,153 :2 1.6229 :. 4;2 13 492 1 19.123 1 1.00 1: 740 1 17,760 1 17,760 1 1,334 12 1.883 13 492 13 492 1 21,960 1 1.00 II
30 LUCERO, 11AX L 755 8.678 11,667 6.040 (7.707 1 I.330 1_ 1.377 15 924 15 924 1 22,762 1 1.00 11 755 1 18,120 1 18,120 1 1,361 12 1,921 15 924 15 924 1 23,250 1 1.00 11
30 MASEPA, VICTOR 8 1,043 11.9E9 16,236 9,344 24.550 1 1.E46 1) 2.753 17 1.236 17 1,440 1 31,855 1 1.00 1; 1,043 1 25,032 1 25,032 1 1,880 11 2,804 17 1,440 17 1,440 ; 32,595 11.00 1,
30 MC CLURE; WENDEL 740 8.506 11.225 5.920 17.205 1.292 12 1,324 •. 492 1. 492 I 21,305 1 1.00 1, 740 1 17,760 1 17,760 1 1,334 12 1,883 13 492 I3 492 1 21.960 1 1.00 1
30 MECHAM, KAY C. 1.952 12.092 16,023 8,416 24.439 1 1,635 11 2,737 15 924 15 924 1 30,860 1 1.00 II 1,052 I 25,248 1 25,248 1 1,896 11 2.928 15 924 15 924 1 31,820 1 1.00 1,
30 MONGER. LESLI A. 526 6,644 6.203 6,203 4 ,i, 12 652 13 492 10 0 1 7,818 1 11 0 0 1 0 0 13 492 10 0 1 492 1
30 FFEIFER, APTHUR 1,052 12.092 16,113 8,416 24.52 :.. _ - 432 27,955 1.00 „ 1,052 5,246 i _ 4S: .. .00 2� 25.24a ,s96 ,6,6 ;R- 30,=0;
30 SAFFORD. LOREN P 1.012 11.632 TERM 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
30 SIMS, DOUOLAS R. 552 6.414 8,581 4,464 P 759 13.804 1 1,037 12 1,463 15 924 15 924 1 12.152 1 1.00 11 591 1 14,184 1 14,184 1 1,065 12 1,504 15 924 15 924 1 18.601 1 I. ',
30 SNARR, DON L. 685 7.974 TERM 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0-1 0.1. .
30 WOLF, JEFFREY L. 590 6.667 1.740 l.i-i 1 :?! 12 lER 17 1.236 17 1.440 1 4,731 1 0 ) 0 1 0 12 0 17 1,440 ;7 ..445 1 2,280 1 „
31.; P2_c, JEFFEE'1 L. 2.184 2.766 5.:9: : 6. . . .. _ 1,235 17 1,440 1 20,111 1 1.00 II 740 1 17,760 1 ' :?.-. 1,334 12 1,283 17 1,440 17 1.440 1 23,856 1 1.00 1,
16-Nov-28 PAGE 2 PAYROLL
EHL2101 SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP-101
SALARY A WAGES
". DEPARTMENT 4750 SOLID WASTE _G1SFOSAL 1354
-1988 Ft
(1) 12) 4) (5) (6) (7) (8) ' (9) (101 111) (12) (13) (14) 11 (151 (16) (171 (18) (19) (20) (211 (22) (231
'' SEMI- SALARY LAST ; LAST 4 CORRECTED 1988 1963 1-1/6-30 7-1/12-31 TOTAL EO FUL11 1989 PROJCTD 17E9 CORRECTED 1789 1989 1-1/6-30 7-1/12-31 TOTAL f
EMPLOYEE MONTH 090P THRU MONTHS MONTHS PROJECTED SOC SEC RETIREMT GRP INS SOP INS SAL/BEN ALLOC 11 PAY 1989 ADJUSTMTS (98a ci SOC SEC RETIREMT GAP INS GRP INS SAL/BEN 1
ACC? NAME RATE RATE 8/31/88 OF E3 CDRRECT1933 TOTAL 1210 1230 1240 1240 1988 1988 11 RATE TOTAL OURS ATE 1210 1230 1240 1240 1989
11
1130 YOUNG, MYRON 909 10.448 14.544 7,272 S 270 22,026 1 1,659 11 2,474 15 924 15 924 1 28,066 1 1.00 11 954 1 22,35o 1 22.836 1 1,719 11 2,564 I5 924 15 924 1 29.028 1
-) 1130 K RICKS RER:CMT 712 8.184 H 2,848 2,848 2(4 12 302 1 0 I7 240 I 3,604 ( 1,00 1, 712 1 17,088 IP 66E 1 17,776 1 1,335 12 1,884 17 1,440 17 1,440 I 23,875 1
NEW ALLOCATIONS 1989 30,784 OP 924 31,908 1 2,396 I2 10,147 17 4,32i, I7 4,320 1 53,091 ,
SICK LEAVE A:3 15.190 15.19'? 1 1,141 I1 1,701 1 18,032 1
. ACCOUNT TOTAL 276,50`: 144,976 4,001 425,477 1 31,953 I 46,010 1 21,926 1 26,128 1 551,495 124.00 1: 1 489,840 1 5,212 1 495,052 13 ,178 1 60,110 1 32,656 ! 33,088 1 658,085 1;
425,477 551,495 658,085
)
)
)
•
16-Nov-88 PAGE I PAYROLL
GNLD2101 SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXF-101
SALARY & WAGES
DEPARTMENT 4750 SOLID '+'ASTE DISPOSAL 1354
•
-1988 Ft -
(1) (2) (3) (41 (5) (6) (7) (8) (91 (10) 111) 112) (13) (14) 11 (15) (161 (17) (18) (19) (201 121) (221 (23)
SEMI- SALARY LAST 4 LAST 4 CORRECTED 1928 1988 1-1/0-30 7-1/12 51 TOTAL EA FUL11 1989 PROJCTD 1989 CORRECTED 1989 1989 1-1/6-30 7-1/12-31 TOTAL El
EMPLOYEE MONTH HOUR THP.0 MONTHS MONTHS PROJECTED SOC EEC RETIREMT ERP INS 6RP INS SAL/BEN ALLOC 11 PAY 1989 ADJUSTMTS 1989 AT SOC SEC RETIREMT GRP INS 6RP INS SAL/BEN A
ACCT NAME RATE RATE 8l31/89 OF 88 CORRECT19S8 TOTAL 1210 1230 124 1240 1988 1988 I) RATE TOTAL CURR RATE 1210 1230 1240 1240 1989
1160 EOL000ER. KELLY 5. 5.598 1,822 944 3,056 5.822 ; 437 1 6,259 1 0.50 11 1 35,000 1 35,000 1 2,629 1 37,629 1
1160 CLAY. RONALD G. 7.874 1,890 1,048 5,247 8,185 1 615 ! 8,800 1 0.50 11 ,
1160 GREEN, MIKE J. 5.598 TERM 0 I 0 0 1 0.00 11 ,
1160 HINCK,S, VALDEE 6. 5,598 493 493 ; 37 ) 530 1 0.04 1 1 1 ,
1160 KEENE, CLYDE B. 7.874 6,173 3,423 (1,4111 8,195 1 615 ; 8,800 1 0.50 I, 1
1160 LEAVITT, GREGORY L. 7.874 2,657 1,409 4,119 8,185 615 ; 8,800 1 0.50 1
1160 THOMPSON, GEORGE J. 5.598 2,060 1,096 2,666 5.822 1 437 1 6,259 1 0.50 I,
1160 TURFIN, JEFFREY 5.518 1,030 TERM 1,030 77 1,107 1 0.09 1 1
1160 VAN DYKE, L. EEl 5.598 36 TERM 36 1 3 1 39 1 0.00 1 ,
1160 NELLINSTON,-DONALD B. 7.874 TERM 0 1 1 ,
, 11 1 1 1
ACCOUNT TOTAL 16,161 7,920 13,677 37,758 1 2,836 1 0 ) 0 ; 0 1 40,594 1 2.62 11 35,000 1 0 1 35,000 1 2,629 1 0 1 O 1 0 1 ..34621_1.
37,758 40,594 37,629
n+;EPTIME= - 34,518 (0,482 45,000 1 3,380 1 5,040 1 53,420 1 OVERTIME 45,000 1 45,000 1 3,380 1 5,040 1 53 1
RETIREES INS 1,111 1 1.223 1 2,334 1 1,223 1 1,223 1 2,445
DIVISION TOTAL 373,131 175,672 28,160 577,163 1 43,345 1 58,770 1 25,509 1 30,231 1 735,018 128.62 11 1 638,768 1 9,124 1 647,892 1 48,657 1 73,308 1 36,759 1 37,191 1 843,806 13
577,163 735,018 647,892 843,806
FILLED ALLOCATIONS 28.62 FILLED ALLOCATIONS 3
- - - LESS TEMPORARY 2.62 LESS TEMPORARY --__.
ACTUAL ALLOCATIONS 26.00 ACTUAL ALLOCATIONS 2
AUTHORIZED ALLOCATIONS26.vj - AUTHORIZED ALLOCATIONS 2
•
•
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP•I03
RENTAL, LEASE AND LEASE PURCHASE ANALYSIS SHEET11 el 21
PAGE_OF
ORGANIZATION SOLID WASTE NO.4750
(I) (2) (3) (4) • (5) (8) (7) (0) (9) (10) (II) (12)
Pnlod d • Humber of Iks. Pate►er 1k. ANNUAL EXPENDITURES
ACCT. (oApmenl or Pierdsas .JSI tat lease Miks or Si.IL Rule a SQ.tl. Auditors Comets Commis
N0.• Denied a Leased Use Svppkmen( Used Milli ACTUAL ESTI) ES1'D flecomn'd Adrlsd. lesoluUon
(Desaibe)&list lessor • Mtached tram io Conk act Budge( Coot scl Mudge. PREVIOUS CURRENT BUDGET Cudgel Budget Cudgel
YIN YearYear Yell YEAR YEAR YEAR
2830 Compactor/Dozer 1-89 12-89 $ $ $ 3,141 $ 360 $ 10,820 $ $ $
•
- 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
r
•
'This sheet should detail the 2810-2875 and 7451-7456 line items requested on schedule Exp.100 TOTALS s 8,141, $ 360 • s 10,820 $ $ $
v �r..,... ._ . .
•
•
SCIIEDULE EXP-103
SALT LAKE COUNTY SIIEET 2 OF 2
RENTAL, LEASE AND LEASE PURCHASE ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OF 1
S OLID WASTE
ORGANIZATION ._.. _ NO.4750
EQUIPMENT OR PREMISES
RENTED OR LEASED JUSTIFICATION'
(DESC:RIDE)& LIST LESSOR
2830 Rent of Equipment This line item will be used to rent equipment during the peak disposal periods and during any emergency situation
i.e.equipment breakdowns, fires, etc..
'TI�Is shoel should detail justification of n11 flows Istod on Exp. 103.Sheol 1 above.
• SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE ExP-too
PROFESSIONAL AND TECIINICAL SERVICES ANALYSIS Page OF _J_
ORCAN17.ATION SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL Ho. 4750 •
•
(I) (2) (3) (4) (5) (0) (7) (0) (9) (10) (11) (12)
Period of ANNUAL EXPENDITURES
Ara Services Contract Terms of AUDITORS' COMMSRS COMMSRS
ACCT. Nnme of C•onsullnnt Doscribo Nnturo of To Do Performed
From To
NO.' Professional or Services Provklod Comport RECMND ADVTSD RESOLTN
Pursuant to saUon ACTUAL EST'D ES1'D BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
Teclullcinrs
ConlracC PREVIOUS CURRENT BUDGET
• YEAR YEAR YEAR
•
2930 Health Department Ground water monitor NO 1-09 12-39 $ 7,527 $ 31,200 $ 15,600 $ $
2930 Salt Lake City Engineering Support NO 1-89 12-89 13,349 76,840 15,000
2930 Health Department Physicals NO 1-89 12-89 740 2,000 2,000
2930 Engineering firms See detail N0 1-39 12-89 19,102 49,440 -0-
various consultants • •
' 2930 Piping/engr firm • Pump house redesign NO 1-39 12-89 10,000
& water purificatioi
systems
•
2930 Landscaping firms Landscaping NO 1-89 12-89 7,000 •
Comprehensive Solid 150,000
991f1 fnnculrinr cplarri4 _ •
Waste Disposal Plan
Implementation Plan NO 1-69 11-69
2930 Consultant selection Sub Title D 180,000
Ground water monitor- N0 1-39 12-09 128,400
2930 Consultant selectio•ing assessment _ •
'111h siwet should detail the 2910,2920,2910,2940 line Items requested on schedule Exp.100 TOTALS $ 40,7^G $ 159,480 S 508,000
1
t
•
•
_ - - •o• , - ... . - -- - Sc- ..-a^.'xlev..,46.Ya.wr p!^.}"t+Qr!:'!i'{ .:il"E�•••." ...
r .;:,:.
•
•
•
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP-104
• PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES ANALYSIS Page 1 OF1
•ORGANIZATION NO.WASTE NO.4750 ' •
(I) (2) (3) (4) (5) (0) (7) (8) (9) (10) (t1) . (12)
•
Period of ANNUAL EXPENDITURES•
_
Nano of Consu11nn1 Doscrbo Nature of Are Services Cooked TomsAUDITOR'S' COMMSRS COMMSRS
ACCT. To Edo Pi/domed 5 Rom To T1ECMND ADVISE) RESOLTN
NO.• Prolosslonol or Services Provided Puseanl to } ACTUAL EST'D EST'D
sallon • BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
Technician Conlrecr PREVIOUS
C YEAR BUDGET
•
2940 Terap service Litter cleanup NO 1_R9 2_Eg S 38,478- f 44,867 S 46,610 f f
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•lhh sheet should de1111 the 2910,2920,2930,2940 line hems tiquaslyd on ttheduli Eep.100 TOTALS S 38,478 S f f $
44.867 46.610
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
We request that the following amounts be entered in the
appropriations table as a control. The submitted budget
request is on a capitalized basis. (i.e. assumed capital
purchases to be posted to the applicable asset account with
only depreciation being the budgeted cost.)
7110 Purchase of Land $1,134,000
7140 Improvement of Grounds 57,000
7150 Fences 9,000
7220 Impr. of Buildings 8,300
7410 Office Equipment 11,920
7420 Autos & Trucks 97,450
7430 Machinery & Equipment 583,525
31,901,195
0215b-29
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCIIEDULE EXP-102
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS SIIEET 1 OF 2
SOLID WASTE 4750 PAGE J. OF L
ORGANIZATION ____.__.__. N0. •
(I) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
•
• COST
NO.OF JUSTIFICATION ITEM(S)WIIICII WILL BE COMMIST1S
ACCT. swam (SEE coop REPLACED BY NEW ITEM ' AUDITOR'S COMMSRS APPROVED
ND. UNITS USE SHEET 2 DESCRIBE PER FIXED ASSET EST. (PLUS) (LESS) NET RECMND ADVTSD RESDLU110N
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM• ON RAND AS HEEDED' . FILE DESCRIPTION) COST INSTLTN 1nAUE-IN COST BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
1,134,00C
7110 Land Purchase 5,9 •
$ $ $
•
•
'lids sheet should detail the 7410,7420,743011ne Items 'Justification Code: TOTALS is 134,OOf S S S
INI%JCstcd 01)sdredvlo Exp. 100 (I) Scheduled replacement.
(2) Present equtpmont obsolete.
(3) Ileploce worn-out equipment.
(4) floduce personnel cost($/year)
(5) Expanded service.
(0) Now oporatIon or program
(7) Increased safety.
(0) Improve care of records. •
(9) fleduce deparknontal expenses.
0r
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCIIEDULE EXP-102
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS SIILET 2 OF 2
JUSTIFICATION PAGE 1 _OF 1
ORGANIZATION SOLID WASTE No. 4750
•
•
•
OESC(1IPTION OF ITEM JUSTIFICATION ' '
To purchase land adjacent to the landfill for future expansion. It proposed—to pay'-For t}ii-s ove-r—d--3-7T83Y—periad'
7110 Land Purchase of 325,221.72 payments with 325,221.72 down which will have total intrest cost of 166,886.88
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
'1111,short should provide ticlnlled luvliflcnllon of on Item,Fled on E.p. 102.shoot 1 above.
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP-102
. CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS • SHEET I OF 2
SOLID WASTE 4750 PAGE 1 OF_I.
ORGANIZATION NO.
(I) (7) (3) (4) • (5) (6) 17) (B) (9) (10) (II) (12)
. •
COST
NO.OF JUSIIFICATION ITEMS)WHICH WILL BE COMMISRS
(SEE CODE) . • REPLACED BY NEW ITEM )) AUDITOR'S COMMSRS APPROVED
HOT UtillS USE SHEET ON IU1HD AS NEEDED' . IILE DESCRIPTION)ESCRIBE PER FIXED
ASSET COST (PLUS)
IRAUE•IN COST BUDGE NET T BUDGET BUDGETRESOLUTION
DESCIIIPIION OF ITEM
Landscaping & .
7140
_ _ $ $10,000 $ f S
signage
Piping redesign &w ater •
7140 purifacation installation 40,000
•
Purchase & installation
7140 of new pump 7,000
•
•
•
•
•
'Thit sheet should detail the 7410,7420,743011ne Items •Jueltllcetlon Code: TOTALS = 57,000 $ • S S
requested on schedule Exp. 100 (I) Scheduled replacement. _
(2) Presort equipment obsolete.
(3) Replace worn-out equipment '
(4) Reduce personnel cost(5/rear)
(5) Expanded serice.
(0) New opora$on or program
(7) Increased safety.
(0) iryrove care of,,cords. •
• (9) Reduce departmental expanses.
e
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP-102
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS SHEET 2 OF 2
JUSTIFICATION PAGE-1_OF 1
ORGANIZATION . SOLID WASTE No 4750
DESCI1IPTION OF ITEM JUSTIFICATION •
7140 Landscaping & signage Purchase and installation of landscaping that requires little or.no watering-improved'l.andfi•ll aesthetics
New and additional signs for improved traffic flow and transfer of landfill information to the public.
Piping redesign & water
7140 purifaction installation Redesign of piping and installation of new (additional) pump in the pumphouse
7140 Pump purchase Installation of water purification system •
—
•
•
•
•
•
'IIJi short shc5Ad piovlJo dolnIIcd,ostlAr.nliOI of all Items listed on Esp. 102,Shoot I nl,ovo.
•
•
•
__ _ .,_.,..•may.... _ .. ..
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY • SCHEDULE EXP-102
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS • SHEET 1 OF 2
SOLID WASTE 4750 PAOEL OF
1
ORGANIZATION NO.
•
(I) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) le) (9) (10) (II) (12)
• COST,
NO.Of JUSTIFICATION ITEM(S)WHICH WILL BE COMMISRS
AccD
NO.' UNITS 1 USE SII ET 2 (DESCRIBE PER FIXED BY NEW EASSET EST. (PLUS) (LESS) NET RECMND AUDITOR'S DV1SD� RESOLUTION
DESCRIPTION Of ITEM
OH(HAND AS NEEDED' . tILE DESCRIPTION) COST INSILIN 1RADE•IN COST BUDGET BUDGET UDGET
7150 Fences • S S $ ;9,000 S S S
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
'Thls sheet should dslsll the 7410,7420,71301Ins Items •Jusllflcsllon Cods:
rc -sledl'xi edhedub Exp. toO (1) Scheduled replacement. TOTALS $9,000 $
mr S S
(2) Present equipment obsolete,
(3) Replace worn-out equipment
(4) Reduce personnel cost($/year) •
(5) Expended service.
(0) New oporetlon or program
(7) Increased safety.
(0) 4nyrove tens ofrocords. •
• (5) Reduce departmental expenses.
i •
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY• SCHEDULE EXP-toe
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS SHEET?1 OF 2 1
JUSTIFICATION PAGE OF
ORGANIZATION •
SOLID WASTE 4750,
_..__ ,.No.
•
OESCf1IPTION OF ITEM JUSTIFICATION •
7150 Fences Design and installation of semi-portable fences for litter control. Fencing of boundary parimeter.
Maintenance of existing compound and parimeter fences.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
'this&Intl should piovido dclnlled IusllOcnllnn of nA Ilcm,bled on tip. 102.shoot 1 nbovo.
•
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP-102
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS SHEET 1 OF 2
SOLIL WASTE PAGE_1_OF 1_
ORGANIZATION..._ ._.—.__.__.— NO. 4740
•
(I) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (0) (9) (10) (11) (t2)
COST
NO. OF JUSTIFICATION ITEM(S)WIIICII WILL BE - COMMISRS
ACCT. SIMILAR (SEE CODE) . REPLACED BY NEW ITEM ' AUDITOR'S COMMSRS
NO.' UNITS USE SHEET 2 (DESCRIBE PER FIXED ASSET EST. (PLUS) (LESS) ; NET RECMND ADVISE) nEsoL
Apply
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
ON HAND AS NEEDED' FILE DESCRIPTION) COST INSTLTN TRADE-IN COST BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET JN
Construction of
7220 small building •
S S S $2,500 $ $ $
7220 Traffic gate controL 1,800 •
7220 Access door in pump
house 1,000
7220 Wall coverings
3,000
•
•
•
•
•
•
his sheet should detail the 7410,7420,7430 line Items •Juelltlestlon Code: TOTALS $8,300 $ S S
requested on schedule Exp. 100 (1) Scheduled replacement.
(2) Present equipment obsolete. •
(3) Replace worn-out equipment. ,
(4) Reduce personnel cost(S/year) •
(5) Expanded service.
(0) New operators or program •
(7) Increased safety.
(8) Improve care olrecords.
(9) Reduce departmental expenses.
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP-102
•
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS SHEET 2 OF 2
JUSTIFICATION PAGE.1_OF.L
ORGANIZATIONSOLID WASTE 4750
•
DESCIIIPTION OF ITEM JUSTIFICATION •
7220 building Construction/development of new traffic station. This building will be necessary when Salt Lake City opens 1300
_ South access from North Temple and 7200 West in order to verify that only paying customers access the disposal site.
The traffic gate control is needed for the second imbound scale to ensure that only one vehicle at a time has access
7220 Traffic control to the scale.
Access door in pump An access door needs to be installed on the top of the pump house root to taciiate the removal and maintenance of the
7220 house submerable pump.
7220 Window coverings Window coverings blinds, and draperies for the office and crew trailer to control the auu light iu the trailer.
•
r
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
'h its slim'should pro'Ido delafled IusnIIcaunn of nil Horns'sled on Exp. 102,shoot 1 above.
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP-102
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSTS SHEET 1 OF 2
SOLID WASTE 4750 PAGE 1_OF 1
ORGANIZATION NO. •
(I) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (0) (9) (10) (11) (12)
' COST
NO.OF JUSTIFICATION ITEM(S)WIIICII WILL DE COMMISRS
ACCT. SIMILAR (SEE CODE) REPLACED BY NEW ITEM ' AUDITOR'S COMMSRS •
NO.* UNITS USE SHEET 2 (DESCRIBE PER FIXED ASSET EST. (PLUS) (LESS) NET RECMND ADVTSD AnEsoi mp.DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
ON RAND AS NEEDED' . FILE DESCRIPTION) COST INSTLTN TRAU -IN COST BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET J
7410 Office furniture 1,500
$ S $ S $ S S
7410 Security survalancc
equipment • 3,100
7410 (2) 286 PC computer _ • 3,040
7410 INoovvell, Netwnrk
950 •
•
7410 HP desk top printer • 730
7410 Report generator •
software 600
Office intrusion '
7410 detection system 1,200
Watchmans tour •
7410 equipment 800 .
•
•
•This sheet should detail the 7410,7420,7430line items 'Justification Code: TOTALS S 11,920 S S S
requesled on schedule Exp. 100 (1) Sdted/ed replacomont. _
(2) Present equipment obsolete.
(3) Replace worn-out equipment •
(4) Bodice personnel cost(S/year) •
(5) Expanded service.
•
(0) Now operation or program
(7) Increased safety.
10) Improve care of records.
(9) Reduce departmental expenses.
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCIIEDULE EXP.102
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS SHEET Y OF Y
JUSTIFICATION PAGE 1_Or'
SOLID WASTE 4750
ORGANIZATION
DESCfIPTION OF ITEM JUSTIFICATION • •
New office furniture will be purchased to replace old worn out furniture in the scale—louse and o fice:�Tew files——
7410 Furniture will be purchased as the demand for more document storage increase.
Electric survilance equipment will increase.security in the landtill buildings. Security keyed time Clock will
7410 Survilance Equipment provide accurate records of after hours personnel. Video for inspection of incomming loads.
7410 Computer upgrade Computer upgrade and expansion of existing system:,.
Office intrusion •
To improve the security of Landfill assets and documents.
1410 _detection systems
•
7410 Watchman tour equipment To improve the security of Landfill assets and documents. .
•
•
•
•
•
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCI IEDULE EXP-IO2
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS SHEET 1 OF 2
SOLID WASTE 4750 PAGE)—OF 1
ORGANIZATION NO.
•
(I) (2) (3) (4) • (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (ID) (II) (I?)
•
• COST
NO.OF JUSTIFICATION ITEM(S)WHIP I WILL BE COMMISITS
(SEE CODE) • REPLACED BY HEW ITEM • AUDITOR'S COMMSRS APPROVED
NO.r UNITS SIMILAR USE SHEET 2 DESCRIBE PER FIXED ASSET EST. (PLUS) (iLESS) NET RECMUO ADV1SD RESOLUIION
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM OH NAND AS NEEDED' . FILE DESCRIPTION) COST INSILIN 1MUE•IN COST BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
Pickup trucks 3/4
7420 ton diesel 4 w/drives. 3 1,3,5,9 2L9 • $ 15,600 $ $ 2,500 $ $ 13,100 $ $
7420 Service truck 0 1,3,5,7,9 3L4
dual axle 48,350 9,000 39,350
Service truck
7420 w/equipment • 45,000
I �
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
t '
- I
'11‘11 shell should detail the 7410,7420,74301Ins Items •Jusllllcetlon Cody
rerpresimlorssdredute Exp.100 (I) Sdreduledseptacement. TOTALS S S 97,450 $ S
(2) P,eso,it equipment obsolete.
(3) Replace worn-out equtprnenL '
(4) Reduce personnel cost(Slyest)
(5) Expanded service.
(0) Now Dom aeon a proQ&n
(7) Increased salety.
(B) Inyrwe case olsecords. •
• (9) Reduce depwbnontal expenses.
,_....,.
•
•
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP-102
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS SI IEET 2 OF 2
JUSTIFICATION PAGE _OF 1
•
ORGANIZATION - SOLID WASTE 4750
DESMIPTION OF ITEM JUSTIFICATION •
7420 Pickup truck This vehicle will replace an older unit which is scheduled to be replaced. Because-TT) the excess�ve�ust ana gr�ne
at the landfill, it causes extensive wear and tear on the engine of a vehicle.
7420 bSgWce truck w/service This vehicle and body will replace an old unit that is scheduled to be replaced. 3L4 — 1932 water truck S56.000 in
...__-... _... r-ep iitb life LV date
. .......�,... _.....�....._.,,,:^.....-�__.......-- ......Y.... ...._ .. .__... • • a•c.•:<' - :"slleuc "1�..io%�::p��2c .. .. '•1LL���. ... ..-. ..y.•
•
•
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCI IEDULE E)(P-102
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS SHEET 1 OF 2
SOLID WASTE 4750 PAGE 1 OF 1
ORGANIZATION HO.
(I) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (II) (12)
COST
NO. OF JUSTIFICATION ITEM(S)WHICH WILL BE COMMISRS
ACCT. (SEE CODE) • REPLACED BY NEW ITEM ' AUDITOR'S COMMSRS APPROVED
NO.' UNI IS SIMILAR USE SHEET 2 (DESCRIBE PER FIXED ASSET EST. (PLUS) (LESS) NET RECMND ADV1SD RESOLUTION
DESCRIPTION Of ITEM ON HAND AS NEEDED* . TILE DESCRIPTION) COST INSTLTH TRADE-IN COST BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
7430 Dozer 2 1,3,5,7,9 11L9 • $347,000 S $ 50,000 $297,000 S S S
7430 Scraper. 3 1,3,5,7,9 29L1 331,525 45,000 286,525 • -
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
lhls sheet should Elston lfi.7410,1420,74301In.Items 'Justification cod.: TOTALS $5E3,52° $ S S
requeslost rxn schedule Exp. 100 (I) Scheduled replacement.
(2) Presont equipment otrs obis. .
(3) ileptace worn-out equipment.
(4) feduce pessornel cost($/year)
(5) Expended service.
(0) Now oper.11on or poyem
(T) Inaeased safety.
(0) Improve cent oltecords. •
•
• • (9) feduce depnslmonlol expenses.
•
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SC11EDULE EXP-102
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS SHEET 2 OF 2
JUSTIFICATION PAGE 1_OF 1
SOLID WASTE 4750
ORGANIZATION . _..__ ..No.
OESC(lIPTION OF ITEM JUSTIFICATION ' •
7430 Dozer This dozer will replace an older unit which is scheduled for replacement 11L9 - 1981 - 15,305 hours
7430 Scraper This scraper will replace one older unit which is scheduled for replacement 29L1 Terex Scraper - 1978 - 20,092 hours
_... ._. (maybe,more)
., .,. ..... ...:a......;,441,.r:e......v=i1i.:.v.i "'•-•...,...-. . .-::'t':L't.. ..:;'7"., .aL�..:qe'.,:. .?. _�i'__•__..• • ...._.... ... ..
1 •
SALT LAKE COUNTY • SCHEDULE XP.105
INTERFUND DETAIL ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OF_
SOLID WASTE 4750
ORGAN)7.A1'ION No
ORGANIZATION SUBMITTING DUDOET ORGANIZATION RECEIVING/PROVIDING SERVICES
ACCT DESCRIPTION • AMOUNT ACC. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
•
various Solid Waste Hi e
15,000 3919 hway
Intrfrfund-Solid Waste (15,000)
•
STATEMENT OF SERVICES TO OE RECEIVED/PROVIDED:
Highway services as requested
DESCRIPTION OF UNITS OF SERVICE:
•
MATERIALS MANI POURS • DATE
a SUPPLIES DATE COMPUTEn RATE
0111En RATE EQUIPMENT RATE.___.__._
•
DILLIN/l OASIS:
AUTOMATIC 0 DEMAND 0
BILLING PERIODS: MONTIILYO QUARTERLY O OTHER U
•
WANT FUNDED:YES 0 %_ COMMENTS:
NO O
•
RESP(*SIDIUTY FOR IN1TIA1ING BILLING: ORGANIZATION INDIVIDUAL •
I IIERF.IIY STATE TIFATTIIE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS REQUEST FOR AN INTERFUND ACCOUNT DAD SEEN
MUTUALLY DISCUSSED AND AGREED UPON WITH TILE CORRESPONDING ORGANIZATION HEAD PRIOR TO TIIE SUB—
MISSION OF THIS REQUEST. •
•
NAME Larry E. Holler
• TITLE nirt'rtnr P 1L, AdDtnistrcation
DATE 10-3-88
•
•
INNB BfiETAIE ftRA• INT€ LY§l§
SOLID WASTE 4750 •
ORGANIZATION No
ORGANIZATION SUOMITTINO BUDGET ORGANIZATION RECEIVING/PROVIDING SERVICES
•
AST. DESCRIPTION ' AMOUNT ACCT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
9120 Solid Waste 12,500 3936 Sanitation (12,500)
1
STATEMENT OF SERVICES TO DE RECEIVED/PROVIDED:
Litter cleanup along roadway entering the landfill •
DESCRIPTION OF UNITS OF SERVICE:
MATERIALS MANI IOURS • MT E•
_
d SL)PPLIES EWE COMPUTER • RATE„ _.��_
OTHER RATE EQUIPMENT RATE. —
_
DILLINF3 OASIS:
AUTOMATIC 0 DEMAND 0
BILLING PERIODS: MONIIILYO QUARTERLY 0 OTTiER U •
•
GRANT FUNDED:YES O %_ COMMENTS:
NO O
•
RESPONSIBILITY FOR INITIATING OR.LINO: ORGANIZATION INDIVIDUAL • �.�.._ ...____.._
I IIT:REIIY STATE THAT TIIE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN TIIIS REQUEST FOR AN INTERFUND ACCOUNT IIAD BEEN
MUTUALLY DISCUSSED AND AGREED UPON WITH TIIE CORRESPONDING ORGANIZATION HEAD PRIOR TO TIIE SUD-
MISSION OF TIIIS REQUEST.
•
NAME Larry_E_ Moller
• TITLE T1i rrrrnr 2Jj. .Administration
DATE 9-27-S8
•
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE EXP-105
INTERFUND DETAIL ANALYSIS PAOELOFA,
ORGANIZATION No WASTE No 4750 •
ORGANIZATION SUBMITTING DUDOET ORGANIZATION RECEIVING/PROVIDING SERVICES
ACCT DESCRIPTION ' AMOUNT ACCT• DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
•
9120 Solid Waste 17,700 540-400
• ' 4700-3936 Sanitation (17,700)
STATEMENT OF SERVICES TO DE RECEIVED/PROVIDED:
Rendering of admistration services (1/2 Bob Williams salary with benefits)
•
•
DESCRIPTION OF UNITS OF SERVICE:
•
MATERIALS MAN1 POURS RA1 E•
-
S APPLIES RATE COMPUTER RATE,__ _�_-
0111E11 RATE EQUIPMENT rim E.•
,___ .._
DILLIN/3 BASIS:
AUTOMATIC O DEMAND O
BILLING PERIODS: MON?IILYO QUARTERLY 0 OTHER _ U
OflAliT FUNDED:YES O %_ COMMENTS: •
NO O
•
RESPONSIBILITY FOn INITIATING BILLING: ORGANIZATION INDIVIDUAL
I HEREBY STATE THAT TIIE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS REQUEST FOR AN INTERFUND ACCOUNT IIAD SEEN
MUTUALLY DISCUSSED AND AGREED UPON WITH TIIE CORRESPONDING ORGANIZATION HEAD PRIOR TO THE SUB-
MISSION OF TIIIS REQUEST. . •
NAME _ Larry E. Moller
TITLE P.W. Lciministration Director
DATE 9-27-38
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCIIEPULE EXP•IO5
INTERFUND DETAIL ANALYSIS PAOE1OF4 •
4750 •
ORGANIZATION SOLID WASTE No
ORGANIZATION SUBMITTING BUDGET ORGANIZATION RECEIVING/PROVIDING SERVICES
•
NOT DESCRIPTION • AMOUNT ACCT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
Please
Assign Solid Waste (15,000) 9120 Sanitation 15,000
STAMEMENT OF SERVICES TO OE RECEIVED/PROVIDED:
Feasibility staudy of Solid Waste Authority
DESCRIPTION OF UNITS OF SERVICE:
•
MATERIALS MANI TOURS TIME
&SUPPLIES RATE COMPUTER RATE.��—
OTT TER RATE EQUIPMENT RATE.,__ _
OILLIN/3 OASIS:
AUTOMATIC O DEMAND 0
•
BILLING PERIODS: MONTItLYO QUARTERLY U OTHER•
U
GRANT FUNDED:YES 0 S_ COMMENTS:
NO O
RESPONSIDILITY FOR INITIATING BILLING: ORGANIZATION INDIVIDUAL ••
I I If ItF.IIY STATE TIIAT TIIE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN TIIIS REQUEST FOR AN INTERFUND ACCOUNT IIAD!TEEN •
MUTUALLY DISCUSSED AND AGREED UPON WITH TIIE CORRESPONDING ORGANIZATION HEAD PRIOR TO TIIE SUD-
MIS.SION OF TIIIS REQUEST.
•
•
NAME Larry E. Moller
TIRE Director P.W. Adminisrtation
DATE 9-27-83
SALT LAKE COUNTY SCIIE9ULE EAP-105
INTERFUND DETAIL ANALYSIS PAOE_OF
ORGANIZATION SOLID WASTE • No 4750
ORGANIZATION SUOMIITINO BUDGET ORGANIZATION IECEIVINO/PROVIDINO SERVICES
ACCT DESCRIPTION ' AMOUNT ACCT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2120
2130 Solid Waste 3,000 '. 3919 Traffic Engineering (3,000)
STATEMENT OF SERVICES TO DE RECEIVED/PROVIDED:
Signs & misc electrical work maintenance of grounds (2120)-2,000, maintenance of buildings(2130)a1,000
DESCRIPTION OF UNITS OF SERVICE:
MATERIALS •
MANIIOURS • MTE '
•
&SUPPLIES MTE COMPUTER RATE..__r.
()limn MTE EQUIPMENT MTE .•
OILLINF3 OASIS:
• AUTOMATIC 0 DEMAND 0
•
CUING PERIODS: MONTIILYO QUARTERLY O OTHER•
❑
WANT FUNDED:YES 0 %_ COMMENTS:
•
NO 0
•
RESPONSIDILITY FOn INITIATING DILLINO: ORGANIZATION INDIVIDUAL•
I IIFREIlY STATE TIIAT TIIE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS REQUEST FOR AN INTERFUND ACCOUNT 11AD BEEN
MUTUALLY DISCUSSED AND AGREED UPON WITH TIIE CORRESPONDING ORGANIZATION HEAD PRIOR TO TIIE SUB-
MISSION OF TIIIS REQUEST.
NAME Larry E. Moller
• TITLE nirrrrnr P.W, Administration
DATE 9-27-IIS
r
RESOLUTION NO. OF 1989
(Adopting the Downtown Master
Plan, Supplementing the 1967
Master Plan of Salt Lake City)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of Salt Lake City, Utah,
after extensive review and discussion by the Commission, its
staff, and citizen advisory groups, has promulgated a document
entitled "Downtown Master Plan" which contains the results of its
research, analysis, and in-depth refinement of the 1967 Master
Plan of Salt Lake City, Utah, as it relates to the Downtown area
of Salt Lake City; and
WHEREAS, said Downtown Master Plan was official adopted by
the Planning Commission on October 27, 1988, as an official
amendment and revision to the 1967 Master Plan, as it relates to
the Downtown area and was subsequently published; and .
WHEREAS, it is the intention that said Master Plan, adopted
pursuant to the responsibility and authority vested in the
Planning Commission, pursuant to Chapter 9 of Title 10, Utah Code
Annotated, guide the growth and development of this community of
the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said Downtown Master
Plan and concurs that its recommendations are valuable to guide
the growth and development of the Downtown area, and it is in the
best interest of the City to endorse and adopt such plan as the
legislative policy of this city to promote orderly long-range
development within the Downtown area.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake
City, Utah, that the document entitled "Downtown Master Plan" ,
properly promulgated and adopted by the Planning Commission, is
hereby officially adopted by this legislative body as part of the
official Master Plan of Salt Lake City, Utah, as a general guide
for the future development within the Downtown area. A copy of
said plan is incorporated by reference and three (3) copies of
said plan shall be retained on file at the Office of the City
Recorder and shall be made available for public review and
inspection.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this
• day of , 1989.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
•. e._J 1jJ.0;y'L~i:tart ..
CITY RECORDER
BRB:rc
-2-
ALLEN C. JOHNSON MEMBERS:
PLANNING DIRECTOR SALT' CINDY CROMER
SANDRA MARLER E -� '�a GITY5 GORPORATION� THOMAS A. ELLISON
SECRETARY
SW��� + - ''��'� ��"` - '�� +� LAVONE LIDDLE-GAMONAL
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES RALPH P.RICH P P.
HOWA
NEILSON
MAYOR OF SALT LAKE CITY Planning and Zoning Commission GEORGE NICOLATUS
CITY ENGINEER 324 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 200 JOHN M.SCHUMANN
CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 F. KEITH STEPAN
CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL PETER VANALSTYNE
535-7757 KATHY WACKER
November 2, 1988
Mr. Craig Peterson, Director
Development Services
324 S. State Street, Suite 201
Salt Lake City , UT 84111
Dear Craig:
Attached please find the First Phase of the Downtown Master Plan developed by
the Planning and Zoning Commission. The first phase represents the overall
vision, goals and objectives for Salt Lake City's Downtown.
The City Council and Planning Conuliission held a joint public hearing for the
plan on October 11, 1988. The Planning Coilunission integrated many comments
received at the hearing and adopted the plan at their regular meeting on
October 27, 1988.
The master planning process will continue with the development of specific
strategies and actions for implementation in the Second Phase. The Planning
Conunission will rely heavily on citizen task forces in developing those
strategies. It is expected that as the Planning Commission develops the
Second Phase of the plan, there will be formal periodic updates of the First
Phase.
The City Council has scheduled the "Downtown Master Plan" for their approval
on Tuesday, November 15, 1988.
Respectfully,
//1/.
211/4i6t—
William T. Wright, AICP
Deputy Planning Director
WIW:DD
attachment
C
I
FIRST PHASE
DOWNTOWN
MASTER
PLAN '
SUBMfl'IE1) TO THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
by the
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING CCMT'IISSION
October 27, 1988
THE DOWNTOWN PLANNING PROCESS
FIRST PLANNING PHASE: VISION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The Downtown plan initially contains vision, goals and objectives statements.
These statements will be circulated to identified groups and persons to
receive comment. Revised statements will be the subject of public hearings
before the Planning Commission and Salt Lake City Council.
While public comment is being obtained, the Planning Commission will begin the
second phase by identifying specific implementation strategies from existing
plans, solicited input and public comment. Some implementation strategies
will require further study and research by City sponsored task forces, which
can be established while the vision goals and objectives are refined and
adopted.
This first phase culminates in the adoption by the Planning Commission and the
Salt Lake City Council of the vision, goals and objectives after consensus on
those statements has been reached among interested persons and the community.
SECOND PLANNING PHASE: IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
The Downtown plan will be supplemented in the second phase with the
identification of specific implementation strategies and options. Those
options will be refined through a public comment process and the work of task
forces.
The second phase culminates in the adoption by the Planning Commission and the
Salt Lake City Council of the implementation strategies.
OTHER PLANNING PHASES
The Planning Commission intends to maintain a regular and continuous planning
process. Action steps, including further refinement of the objectives and
strategies, the development of time tables and priorities, the preparation of
detailed text and maps and the adoption of ordinance changes will be
necessary.
Further plan requirements and actions will be identified on an ongoing basis
and a process will be implemented to refine and develop consensus around any
individual requirements or actions.
IMPLEIMMENTTATION
It is contemplated that implementation will be ongoing and will commence as
soon as consensus has been reached on any objective and implementation
strategy.
1
THE PURPOSE OF THE DOWNTOWN PLAN
Downtown Salt Lake City is the "central place" for the Wasatch Front, the
State of Utah and the Intermountain West. The core is generally described as
the area extending from South Temple to 400 South and West Temple to 200 East.
However, Downtown Salt Lake City includes a larger area between I-15 to 700
East and North Temple to 900 South of associated industrial, service,
commercial and residential uses that interrelate and support the core.
Discussion of the core area without addressing its relationship, reliance and
importance of the adjoining areas would be incomplete. Downtown is currently
the focus of substantial public planning interest and will soon be the subject
of renewed development pressures.
The Salt Lake City Planning and Zoning Commission is charged with the
legal responsibility to develop and implement a comprehensive plan for Salt
Lake City. This Downtown Plan is part of an ongoing comprehensive process
that will ultimately develop, through public participation, a detailed plan
for Downtown's future.
The purpose of this Downtown Plan is to articulate the "vision" of
Downtown with its essential goals and objectives to direct the future of
Downtown. The Downtown Plan will _formulate public policies, identify needed
public facilities and involve the necessary public commitment to achieve the
vision, goals and objectives. Finally, the Plan will describe the "process"
for developing a consensus on specific strategies that will put the Plan tO
work and bring the vision to reality.
2
DOWNTOWN IN VISION
The settlement of Salt Lake is unique among American cities. The people who
founded the city did not come as individuals but as a centrally directed group
intent on building an independent society. The city was laid out on a grid
pattern called "the plat of Zion" and was designed to function as an
ecclesiastical and agrarian center. Within the original plan there were no
provisions for a defined "business district."
As Salt Lake became a transportation hub, commerce became important and
business grew along the Main Street Corridor. Salt Lake expanded to take on
new roles as a regional center for employment and retail sales as well as a
variety of services and industries.
In the 1960's a group of concerned leaders formulated the "vision" of Salt
Lake for the next 25 years, known as the Second Century Plan. Many of the
recommendations of this plan formed the basis for decisions over the next
several decades, including the location for the Salt Palace, Local Government
Center and Main Strcct beautification. The changes over the next 25 years
will be as dramatic as the changes during the past.
Downtown Salt Lake City, 25 years from now:
Downtown is recognized as one of the great cities of America, providing
activities, attractions, and amenities for its 24 hour population, the
residents of the region it serves and increasing numbers of visitors who are
drawn to Downtown as a destination. Elements and features of a great city are
identified and realized through the consensus developed during ongoing
Downtown planning processes that stimulate private development and direct
investment of public funds.
Downtown is the showplace for Utah's architectural heritage with landmark
"signature" buildings. New development of uncompromised quality complements
preserved historical structures. Public buildings and places provide
exemplary architectural design and are strategically located to stimulate and
complement desired private investment.
Open space contributes to a livable environment that is enjoyable and human in
scale. Downtown's growth is accomplished in a manner that preserves and
enhances its close connection with the natural environment.
People stimulate the activities and vitality of Downtown. People interact,
experiencing the social, cultural and commercial interchange that only occurs
in a diverse urban setting. Downtown is an urban neighborhood housing a
demographically diverse population.
3
Downtown is the world center for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day
Saints and a world destination for those seeking to experience the unique
features and activities of our natural environment. Downtown is the business
and financial employment center for the Intermountain region. Downtown hosts
tourist, retail, entertainment and cultural activities within convenient and
concentrated amenities.
Downtown Salt Lake City is Downtown Wasatch Front, Downtown Utah and Downtown
Intermountain West. Its successes affect the quality of life of persons
living in seven states and up to 500 miles from its core. In short, Downtown
Salt Lake maintains its prominence as the premier vitality center of the
Intermountain West.
•
•
DOWNTOWN GOALS
O TUJ 4EN./LCADERSHIP
Develop a strong regional consensus and commitment to Downtown and the
Downtown Plan and take leadership in the region on those issues of direct
impact to Downtown.
PLANNING/CRITICAL MASS
Plan to develop a critical mass of political commitment, implementation
strategies, public capital investment, private investment and people to
establish downtown as the growth center of the region.
PUBLIC INVFSIM INT/INFRASIRUCIURE
Establish a long-term Downtown public investments plan that will guide public
funds into programs and activities to encourage private investment and assure
the livability of the community.
PEDPT.F/24 HOUR POPULATION
Establish Downtown as a well-planned, desirable and diverse activity center
serving the needs of a sizable 24-hour population.
ACTIVITIEb/AMEN1T1Kh
Concentrate and develop those public facilities and associated cultural,
recreational and entertainment activities and opportunities that make Salt
Lake one of the greatest of cities.
BUILT /DEVELOPMENT
Preserve and reuse our existing physical environment while providing for the
orderly transition of certain land uses and creating a new expectation of
uncompromised quality for future downtown developments.
NATURAL . 'r I /COMPATIBILITY
Promote the physical connection and compatibility of the built environment
with the natural environment and maximize the opportunities created by
Downtown's unique proximity to nature.
5
DC7MTt N OBJECTIVES
COMMITMENT/LEADERSHIP
CONSENSUS- Develop consensus among other governmental entities as to
the importance and impact of Downtown on the region and obtain their
support for the continued development of Downtown.
FOCUS- Advocate the role of Downtown as a regional focus for cultural
and economic development.
GOVERNMENT- Retain and assure expansion of State, County and
City offices within Downtown.
( CWIH- Take the lead in establishing and implementing economic
development strategies.
ASSETS- Publicize Downtown strengths and assets.
PRIVATE INTERESTS- Utilize the efforts of private and institutional
interests in the promotion of Downtown goals.
ADVOCACY- Advocate policies on regional issues that will enhance
Downtown's image and development.
PLANNING/CRITICAL MASS
PROCESS- Define and implement ongoing Downtown planning, capital •
investment, economic development and design review processes actively
involving the community.
INFLUENCE- Provide effective channels of influence for an ongoing
advocacy group for Downtown interests.
IMPLEMENTATION- Identify and adopt strategies, zoning and regulation
changes to facilitate plan implementation.
•• e• • ION- Achieve concentration of related uses and activities.
ACCCUN rARILITY- Implement processes and make administrative changes
necessary to assure timely, effective plan implementation.
PUBLIC INVESTMENT/INFRASTRUCTURE
• I - Direct public funds to those areas that will stimulate
private investment and maximize public return.
DESIRABILITY- Invest in those projects, programs and activities that
solidify and promote the desirability of Downtown as a place to live,
work, shop and play.
6
RECREATION- Expand sports and recreation opportunities that are
appropriate for residents, visitors and businesses.
TOURISI5- Establish Downtown as a recognized destination for
tourism and conventions.
ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT- Expand Downtown arts, cultural and
entertainment activities.
EVENTS- Promote and sponsor Downtown events and celebrations.
BUILT ENVIRONMENT/DEVELOPMEI\TTT
CHARACTER- Reinforce specific physical qualities and historical
development patterns that establish Downtown Salt Lake's unique urban
character.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION- Preserve historically significant
buildings and districts while accommodating new development and
renovation that is sensitive to existing character.
DISTRICTS- Solidify and promote specialized districts, each
with its own identity based on scale of buildings, intensity of
activity and mix of uses.
INFILL- Reuse existing structures while weaving new projects into the
urban fabric.
DFSIQV- Develop and implement physical design guidelines and review
processes that will assure development of the highest quality.
PTT ICIENCY- Provide an efficient streamlined review and approval
process that maximizes public goals while encouraging development.
CATALYST- Use appropriately designed and located projects within the
built environment as a catalyst for Downtown investment.
PARKING- Develop a parking plan and system that coordinates, manages
and integrates existing and future personal and mass transit systems.
NATURAL ENVIRONMENTT/COMIPATIBILITY
OPEN SPACE- Create a major public open space to function as a
catalyst for Downtown development and an attraction for cultural,
recreational, retail and development opportunities.
PUBLIC SPACE- Improve design and upkeep of public spaces.
AIR- Implement policies to improve air quality.
VISTAS- Preserve vistas and physical connections to our unique mountain
setting.
8
r7/
ROGER F. CUTLER 3_ �' TY�C, R '. ho lm, RAY ASSISTANT
L ANT ATTORNEYS
E
CITY ATTORNEY •"►r
CHERYL D. LUKE LAW DEPARTMENT GREG R, HAWKINS
JUDY F. LEVER
CITY PROSECUTOR 100 CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING LARRY V. SPENDLOVE
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 ST.EVEN W. ALLRED
(801) 535-7788 BRUCE R. BAIRD
FRANK M. NAKAMURA
ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS
October 6, 1986 JOHN N. SPIKES
DONALD L. GEORGE
ARTHUR L. KEESLER, JR.
CECELIA M. ESPENOZA
Memo
TO: LuAnn Fawcett
Development Services
Fran : Bruce R. Baird
Assistant City Attorey
Re : Master Plan Adoption
Per your request this memo will outline the policies
for adopting a Master Plan. Section 10-9-21, U.C.A. ,.
provides that if the Master Plan has been "adopted" ,
development contrary to the plan is prohibited . It thus
appears that "adoption" of the Master Plan is an exercise of
the Council ' s legislative power rather than its administra-
tive power and , thus , must be adopted by ordinance pursuant
to 10-3-701, U. C.A. , as opposed to 10-3-717, U.C.A.
If you have any questions, please call .
BRB :rc36
ADOPTION OF 1988 UNIFORM FIRE CODE (
STAFF RECCVMENDATION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION BY: Cam Caldwell
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: To adopt the 1988 edition of the Uniform Fire
Code.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City formally adopted the 1982 edition of the
Uniform Fire Code several years ago. The Fire Department is now proposing
that this code be formally updated, consistent with the recommendations of the
Western Fire Chief's Association and the International Conference of Building
Officials.
The 1988 code is proposed for adoption with a few changes. Those changes have
been reviewed with the City Attorney's Office and the Fire Department staff.
The most significant amendment to the code is the deletion of the requirement
or permits for thirty-six uses and locations identified as high hazard
locations in the code. The proposed amendments seek to establish permit fees,
adopted by the City Council, for only eight locations and uses. In the
existing language of the code, fees for the inspections associated with
awarding permits are established administratively.
The Fire Department has indicated that no fees have been established in the
past. The Fire Department projects that $22,700 in new revenue will be
generated if the eight locations and uses are charged permit fees. The
proposed fee structure was intended to achieve legislative intent to generate
$33,000 in hazardous materials inspection fees. This money was to be
generated by the Fire Department to finance a fire prevention inspector
position which had been proposed for elimination in the proposed budget
submitted by the Mayor.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The Council staff support the adoption of
the revised version of the Uniform Fire Code, with the exception of the
amendments to eliminate permit requirements for the thirty-six uses.
The Uniform Fire Code requires permits for these locations because of their
high hazard potential. Council staff take the position that the requiring of
permits for the thirty-six additional locations and uses will 1) bring more
locations into compliance with the code and thereby prevent possible fires,
and 2) assist firefighters to extinguish fires that may occur at these high
hazard locations by familiarizing them with any hazardous materials or life
threatening conditions which may exist.
Inspections are currently conducted by the fire prevention staff or by
department engine companies. Council staff recommend that permit fees be
established for each of these high hazard locations. We recommend that the
administration continue to set these fees, and that they be based upon the
full cost of preparing for and conducting the inspections, including all
reasonable costs associated with processing the permits.
Council staff also recommend that the proposed code include 1) a penalty
clause of up to $1,000 for flagrant violations of the code which endanger the
public, and 2) a penalty of double the price of the permit for inadvertent
failure to obtain a permit. The double charge for the inadvertent failure to
obtain a permit is the current practice of the Engineering Department. The
City Attorney's Office concurs with this recommendation.
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: I move that we close this hearing concerning the Uniform
Fire Code.
I move that we refer the ordinance adopting the Uniform Fire Code to the City
Attorney's Office to redraft 1) Section 4. 108 defining the operations,
activities, practices or functions for which a permit is required; and 2) to
establish penalties for flagrant violation of the code, and inadvertent
failure to obtain a permit.
ANTICIPATED OPPOSITION: Opposition may be voiced by businesses which are
required to pay for the permit fees. Council staff recommend that those who
1) have a business use identified as a high hazard location, and 2) receive
the benefit of a permit inspection should pay for the reasonable costs
associated with making that inspection. This was Councils original position
in designating that the fees should be established when the legislative intent
was proposed.
The Fire Department may also oppose the Council staff position on the basis
that they are currently inadequately staffed to perform the inspections out of
the Fire Prevention Bureau. Council staff believe that these inspections can
be performed by the engine companies, if they are not conducted by the Fire
Prevention Bureau.
SALT'J C Y Cgri ": ION
FIRE DEPARTMENT
PETER O. PEDERSON 305 EAST 200 SOUTH
CHIEF OF FIRE DEPARTMENT SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111
799.4101 .. -
December 16, 1988
Mayor Palmer DePaulis
324 South State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Dear Mayor DePaulis :
Please accept this request for Council action.
1. Subject: Adoption of the 1988 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) .
2. Recommendation : Council approval is recommended.
3. Funding: No request for funds is involved. Proposed permit fees for
hazardous materials and petrochemicals are based on the estimated cost of
the regulation and inspection service provided. Proposed fees (see
Article 4, UFC, of the proposed ordinance) are summarized below, with
revenue estimates.
Aircraft Refueling Vehicles.
6 permittees @ $50.00 $300.00
30 certified employees @ $10.00 $300.00
Explosives or Blasting Agents
$50.00/blast, or $125.00/project, or $500.00/year
Revenue based on past permits $630.00
Fireworks $50.00/display
Revenue based on past permits 1300.00
Flammable or Combustible liquids and tanks
A. B. Storage 50 @ $50.00 2500.00
C. E .F. Tanks 80 @ $50.00 4000.00
D. Operation 0.00
Hazardous Materials
Storage 100 @ $50.00 5000.00
Emergency Response Plan 20 @ $200.00 4000.00
Liquefied Petroleum Gas $45.00/installation
Revenue based on past permits 1080.00
Mall
A. Temporary Booth 10 @ $25.00 250.00
B. Assembly 5 @ $50.00 250.00
C. Open Flame 0.00
D. Fueled Equipment 10 @ $10.00 100.00
E. Flammable Gas 0.00
Spraying or Dipping (Flammable finishes)
40 @ $50.00 2000.00
TOTAL ANNUAL REVENUE $22,710.00
4. Background and Discussion : The UFC, as a model code, is a companion to
other codes written by the same organizations. The 1988 edition of the
Uniform Building Code has already been adopted by Salt Lake City.
Adoption of the corresponding edition of the UFC is essential to maintain
compatibility between the building and fire codes. This is especially
important in the regulation of hazardous materials, because the applicable
sections of the new editions of both the building and fire codes are
substantially different from previous editions.
The proposed code has two major substantive changes from the existing fire
code. First, in accordance with legislative intent, permit fees are
included as listed above. Secondly, regulations relating to hazardous
materials are more detailed in the new code. The more detailed
regulations will enable inspectors with lower levels of specialized
technical knowledge to participate in the inspection and regulation of
hazardous materials. More members of the work force, therefore, can
participate in this activity. The safety of the community will be guarded
more effectively.
The Fire Marshal has discussed the new code with representatives of the
petroleum industry, hazardous materials industry, and Salt Lake Airport
Operations. No opposition or controversy is expected in enacting the
ordinance.
5. Legislative Document: Copies of the proposed ordinance are attached.
6. Contact Person: Fire Marshal George Sumner, Fire Department, 799-4160.
7. Submitted by: Peter 0. Pederson, Chief, Fire Department, 799-4101.
Res ct ully,
0•
P ter 0. Pederson
f A ,
J JV
th
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 1988
(Adopting the Uniform Fire Code with
Various deletions and Additions)
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE OF THE SALT
LAKE CITY CODE, 1988, WITH VARIOUS DELETIONS AND ADDITIONS AS
FOLLOWS:
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. That the Uniform Fire Code of the Salt Lake
City Code, 1988, with the following various deletions and
additions, be, and the same hereby is adopted as follows:
Section 17.20.020 C. of the Salt Lake City Code relating to
Fire hydrant requirements for developments is amended to read as
follows:
Sec. 17.20.020 C. No dwelling unit constructed after
January 1, 1989, in either such development shall be located
more than [threc hundred] two hundred fifty feet from a fire
hydrant, measured along the curb in front of each said fire
hydrant. The bottom of the sidewalk flange on each fire hydrant
must be at least even with, but may be slightly higher than, the
sidewalk, and all water outlets on such hydrants must as nearly
as possible, face the street.
Section 17.20.040 of the Salt Lake City Code relating to
Hydrant specifications is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 17.20.040 All hydrants, whether public hydrants or
private hydrants, installed in any such subdivision must comply
with then-current specifications for fire hydrants of the
department of public utilities and must be located as required
by the fire department.
Section 17.20.060 C. of the Salt Lake City Code relating to
Installation and permit requirements is amended to read as
follows:
Sec. 17.20.060 C. [It is unlawful for any person to
complete for than thirty percent of the construction of any new
building or building addition, other than buildings designed for
b
feet from a fire hydrant, meo ur c in
front of each fire hydrant. ] Fire hydrants shall be installed as
per Uniform Fire Code 87.103. (c) prior to construction.
Chapter 18.44 of the Salt Lake City Code relating to Fire
4
Prevention and Uniform Fire Code and Standards is amended to read
as follows:
Chapter 18.44
FIRE PREVENTION AND UNIFORM FIRE CODE
SECTIONS:
Article I . Uniform Fire code
18.44.010 Uniform Fire Code and Standards adopted.
18.44.020 Uniform Fire Code--Deletions.
18.44.030 Uniform Fire Code--Amendments.
18.44.040 UFC Section [2.302] 2.303 amended--Appeals--Board
of Appeals. _
18.44.050 UFC Section [4.101] 4. 108 amended--[Permits for
acetylene generators. ] Permits and fees required.
18.44.060 UFC Section 4.103 amended--Permit applications
and fees.
18.44.070 [ ] UFC Sections 45.207.2 and
45.209. (c) amended--Limited spraying areas and
spray booth fire protection equipment.
-2-
18.44.080 UFC Section [10.207(g)] 10.207. (m) added-- [Access
roadways. ] Fire lanes.
18.44.090 [UFC Section 10.316 added Hose lines for
UFC 11.201 . (b) amended--Containers
and removal.
18.44-091 UFC Section 11 .201. (d) amended--Dumpster and
container location.
18.44.092 UFC Section 11.301 amended--Reporting of fires.
18.44. 100 [UFC Section 11 .201(a) amended Accumulation off
waste materials Wecd control. ] UFC Section 34. 104
amended--Burning operations.
18.44. 110 UFC Section 78.102 and 78. 103 amended, [Section
78.104 added ] Fireworks.
18.44. 120 UFC Section [79 115] 79. 117 added--Adulterated
liquids as flammable.
18.44. 130 UFC Section 79.301( f) added--Maximum gross tank
capacity indoors.
18.44. 140 UFC Section [79 508(c)] 79. 507(c) amended--Diked
areas.
18.44. 150 [UFC Appendix ILIA amended Testing fire
. ] UFC Appendix III-A
section 4 second exception amended--Fire-flow
requirements for buildings.
18.44. 160 UFC Appendix Chapter I-A amended--Life safety
requirements for existing buildings.
18.44. 161 UFC Article 80--Hazardous Materials.
Article II. Flammable Liquids and Explosives
18.44. 170 Outside storage in above-ground tanks District
limits.
18.44. 180 Liquefied petroleum gas storage areas.
18.44. 190 Storage of explosives and blasting agents.
Article III. Enforcement and Penalties
[18.44.200 Abatement procedures for cleaning real property. ]
18.44.210 Permits--Withholding, suspension and revocation.
18.44.220 Mandatory and prohibitionary nature of chapter.
Section 18.44.010 of the Salt Lake City Code relating to
Uniform Fire Code and Standards adopted is amended to read as
follows:
Sec. 18.44.010 Uniform Fire Code and Standards adopted.
That certain code and standards known as the Uniform Fire
Code, [1982] 1988 Edition, including Appendix Chapters I-A, [I—
B] , I-C, II-E, III-A, III-B, III-C, V-A, VI-A, VI-C, VI-D, and
-3-
VI-E and the Uniform Fire Code Standards, [1982] 1988 Edition,
as promulgated and published by the Western Fire Chiefs
Association and the International Conference of Building
Officials are adopted by reference by Salt Lake City as the
ordinances, rules and regulations of the city, subject to
deletions, amendments and exceptions thereto set out in this
chapter. [Three copico] One copy of said code shall be on file
for public use and examination in the office of the City
Recorder. Hereafter, all references in these provisions to the
Uniform Fire Code and/or said Standards shall refer to the
[1982] 1988 Editions thereof.
Section 18.44.020 of the Salt Lake City Ccr1P relating to Uniform Fire
Code--Deletions is axre xled to read as follows:
Sec. 18.44.020 Uniform Fire Crrde--Deletions.
Spx-ifically deleted frail the Uniform Fire Code adopted above are
Appendix Chapters I-B, II-A, II-B, II-C, II-D, [[III B], IV-A and [VI A D],
VI-B, which have no effect in this jurisdiction.
Section 18.44.030 of the Salt Lake City Crr1Q relating to Uniform Fire
Code--Amernts is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 18.44.010 Uniform Fire Code and Standards adopted.
Sec. 18.44.020 Uniform Fire Crjie--T 1etions.
Sec. 18.44.030 Uniform Fire CYY1e--Amendments.
Sec. 18.44.040 UFC Section [2.302] 2.303 amerced--Appeals--Board of
Appeals.
Sec. 18.44.050 UFC Section [4 101] 4.108 amended--[Knits for aectyleno
generators.] Permits and fees required.
-4-
Sr-. 18.44.060 UFC Section 4.103 amended--Permit applications and fees.
Si-. 18.44.070 [Inspections.] UFC Sections 45.207.2 and 45.209.(c)
amended--Limited spraying areas and spray booth fire
protection equipment.
Sr,P 18.44.080 UFC Section [10.207(g)] 10.207.(m) added [Access
readways.] Fire lanes.
SPr-. 18.44.090 [UFC Section 10.316 added Bose lines for demolitions.]
UFC 11.201.(b) amended--Containers and removal.
Sr. 18.44.091 UFC Section 11.201.(d) amended--D)unpster and container
location.
Sri. 18.44.092 UFC Section 11.301 amended--Reporting of fires.
S . 18.44.100 [UFC Section 11.201(a) amended Accumulation of waste
materials Weed control.] UFC Section 34.104 amended--
Burning operations.
CPC'. 18.44.110 UFC Section 78.102 and 78.103 amended[Ccctici 78.104
edded]--Fireworks.
Sr. 18.44.120 UFC Section [79 115] 79.117 added--Adulterated liquids as
flammable.
Sr-. 18.44.130 UFC Section 79.301(f) added--Maximum gross tank capacity
indoors.
Sr-. 18.44.140 UFC Section [79 508(c)] 79.507.(c) amended--Diked areas.
Sr-. 18.44.150 [UFC Appendix III A amended Testing fire extinguishing
m;skiing
oyotems.] UFC Appendix III-A section 4 second exception
amended--Fire-flow requirements for buildings.
Sr-. 18.44.160 UFC Appendix Chapter I-A amended--Life safety
requirements for existing buildings.
-5-
Sec. 18.44.161 UFC Article 80--Hazardous Materials.
Section 18.44.040 of the Salt Lake City Cndp relating to UFC Section
2.302 amended--Appeals--Board of Appeals is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 18.44.040 UFC Section [2.302] 2.303 amended--Appeals--Board of
Appeals.
Section [2.302] 2.303 of the Uniform Fire Code relating to the board of
appeals is amended to read as follows:
Sec. [2.302.] 2.303. Board of Appeals. (a) ***
(b)***
(c)***
(d)***
Section 18.44.050 of the Salt Lake City Code relating to UFC 4-101
amended--Permits for arr tylene generators is amended to read as follows:
Ser. 18.44.050 UFC Section [ 01] 4.108 amended--[Permits for
acetylene generators.] Permits and fpPs required.
Section 4.108 of the Uniform Fire C'rde_, relating to Permits and fecs
required is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 4.108 Permit Required. A permit shall be obtained from the bureau
of fire prevention prior to engaging in the following activities, operations,
practices or functions:
a.l. Aircraft Refueling Vehicles. To operate aircraft refueling
vehicles. See section 24.202. Permit fee: $50.00.
[ .]
[Assembly. Sec Places of Assembly.]
[a.3. Aubamobile Ong Yard. ***.]
[b.l. Bonfires or rutti4h fires- ***,]
-6-
[b.2. Bowling pin or alley refinishing. +4*•]
[b.3. Burning in a public place. ***. ]
[ . . . .]
[ • • . .]
[c.3. Cellulose nitrate storage. **4-.]
[ - •]
[c.5. Ombustible material storage. ***.]
[c.6. Cempressed _ ***•]
[c.7. Cryogen. ***. ]
[d.l. Dry ciconi.ng plants. 11*.]
[d.2. Dust probing operations. ***.]
e.l. FkpinRives or blasting ayuits. For permits for explosives or
blasting agents, qr441 Article 77 as amended in Section 18.44.105 of
the Salt Lake City Code. Permit fee: Storage, $50.00, One-year
permit. Blasting: Single event, $50.00. Single project, $125.00.
One-year permit, $500.00.
f.1. Fireworks. For permits for fireworks, see Article 78. Permit fee:
Public Display of Fireworks: Single event, $50.00.
[ • .
l
f.3. flammahle ar combustible liquids and tanks.
A. Stutaye inside buildings.s. To store, handle or use Class I
liquids in excess of 5 gallons in a building or in excess of 10
gallons outside of any building, except that a permit is not
required for the following:
-7-
(i) The storage or iiPa of Class I liquids in the fuel tank of
a motor vehicle, aircraft, motorboat, mobile power plant
or mobile heating plant, unless such storage, in the
opinion of the chief, would cause an unsafe condition.
(ii) The storage or ue of paints, oils, varnishes or similar
flammable mixtures when such liquids are stored for
maintenance, painting or similar purposes for a period of
not more than 30 days.
Permit fee: $50.00.
B. To store, handle or 119qP Class II or Class III-A liquids in
excess of 25 gallons in a building or in excess of 60 gallons
outside a building, except for fuel oil used in connection with
oil-burning equipment. Permit Fee: $50.00.
C. To remove Class I or Class II liquids fran an underground
storage tank used for fueling nul,ur vehicles by any means other
than the approved, stationary on-site pumps normally used for
dispensing purposes. Permit fee: $50.00. Temporary permit
for not Mule than the existing contents of a tank.
D. To install[,,—] or alter[, or operate] equipment in connection
with the storage, handling, MP or sale of flammable or
combustible liquids regulated under Article 79. Permit fee:
$50.00.
E. To install, alter, remove, abandon, place temporarily out of
service or otherwise dispose of any flammable or combustible
liquid tank. Permit fee: $50.00. Single-event permit.
-8-
F. To change the type of contents stored in any flammable or
arnbustible liquid tank to a material other than that for which
the tank was riesigned and constructed. Permit fee: $50.00.
Single-event permit.
[g•l. Garage. ***.]
h.l. Hazatdais materials. To store, transport on site, dispense, use or
handle hazardous materials in excess of the following amounts:
(Adopt table as written).
Permit fee: $50.00. One-year permit.
Pre-incident emergency response plan inspection fee: $200.00.
One-time fee.
[h.2. Ilasmuotdous Production ordExd.a7s. ***.]
[ .]
[h.3. High piled ccmbustible storage. ***.]
[j.l. Junk yards. ***.]
1.1. Liquefied Petroleum Gases. Except for portable containers of less
than 96 water gallows LPG capacity, to install any LPG container.
See Article 82. Permit fee: $45.00. One-time permit.
m.2. Mall, covered. To nRe a cowered mall in the following manner:
A. Placing or constructing temporary kiosks, display booths,
concession equipment or the like in the mall. Permit fee:
$25.00 per booth. Temporary permit for specified time period.
-9-
B. To use the mall as a plc of assembly. Permit fee: $50.00
pPr event, not to exceed $150.00 for events or performances
which are repeated without change in format.
C. To use open-flame or flame-producing devices. Permit fee:
$25.00. Temporary permit for specified period of time.
D. To display any liquid or gas-fueled powered equipment. Permit
fee: $10.00 for each vehicle or piece of equipment, but not
1Pss 'than $50.00 for each display. Temporary permit for a
specified period of time.
E. To use any liquefied petroleum gas, liquefied natural gas and
compressed flammable gas. SPP Article 35. Permit fee: $25.00
for each installation. Temporary permit for a specified period
of time.
[m.3. tom. ***.
n.l. Nitrate film. ***.
o.l. O11 and natural gas wells. ***.
o.2. Open flame devices in mrrims. ***.
o.3. Organic coatings. ***.
. . .
p.l. Ibrade float. ***.
p.2. Plate of assembly. *4'''.
r.l. D diaactive materials. ***.
Ib1I fires. Sce bonfires.]
-10-
s.1. Spraying or dipping. (Adopt as written). Permit fee: Total of A
through F below, not to exceed $150.00 per year.
A. Spray finishing.erg. Permit fee: $50.00.
B. Dip tanks. Permit fee: $50.00.
C. EaclobrostEdAbaproratus. Permit fee: $50.00.
D. Automobile urtnoating. Permit fee: $50.00.
E. Powder coating. Permit fee: $50.00.
F. Organic pe rmide_s and dual component orating. Permit fee:
$50.00.
[t.l. Tank vehicles. ' .]
[ - . -
[t.3. Tire B000pping. ***.]
[ . . .]
Section 18.44.060 of the Salt Lake City CrOP relating to UFC 4.103--
Permit applications and fees is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 18.44.060 UFC Section 4.103 amended--Permit applications and fcPs.
4.103 Permit Applirati and Foes
(a) All applications for a permit required by this Code as, amended
herein, shall be made to the bureau of fire prevention in such form
and detail as the Bureau shall prescribe. Applications for permits
shall be accompanied by such plans as required by the bureau.
(b) Each application shall be accompanied by the permit fee designated
in 18.44.050 at the time of application. No application for permit
will be taken, nor will a permit be granted without the payment of
that fee. Said fee is nonrefundable.
-11-
(c) Unle�R otherwise noted in 18.44.050 all permits are good for one
year and must be renewed on an annual basis. The fee for the coning
year shall be paid in full before the expiration of the existing
permit.
Section 18.44.070 of the Salt Lake City C'rie relating to Inspections is
repealed.
There is hereby added to the Municipal Cnde of Salt Lake City, Section
18.44.070, which is to read as follows:
Ser. 18.44.070 UFC Sections 45.207.2 and 45.209.(c) amended--Limited
spraying areas and spray booth fire protection equipment.
Section 45.207.2 of the Uniform Fire C'rrle, relating to limited spraying
areas is amended to read as follows:
Ser. 45.207.2. The size of job to be done in such areas does not exceed
nine square feet and is not of a continuous nature.
Notre: It is the intent of Item 2 to allow only small jobs which in their
entirety do not exceed nine square feet and do not require more than thirty
(30) minutes to complete.
Section 45.209.(c) of the Uniform Fire C'rrie relating to spray booth fire
protection equipment is amended to read as follows:
Ser. 45.209.(c) Space within spray booth on the downstream and upstream
sides of filters shall be protected with an approved automatic [opr klcr3]
fire extinguishing system.
Section 18.44.080 of the Salt Lake City Code relating to UFC Section
10.207(g) added--Access roadways is amended to read as follows:
Ser. 18.44.080 UFC Section [10.207(g)] 10.207.(m) added--[Access
roadways.] Fire lanes.
-12-
Section 10.207 of the Uniform Fire C'rrlc, relating to artp�s roadways for
fire apparatus, is amended by deleting paragraphs (a) through (f) of 18.44.080
and by adding a new subsection [(g)] (m) relating to fire lanes, which shall
read as follows:
10.207. [(a) ***•]
[(b) ***,]
[(c) ***•]
[(d) ***,]
[(e) ***,]
[(f) ***,]
[(g)] (m) Fire lanes. ***.
Section 18.44.090 of the Salt Lake City Crr3P relating to UFC Section
10.315 added Hose lines for demolitions is repealed.
There is hereby added to the Salt Lake City Cole, Section 8.44.090, which
is to read as follows:
S&r.. 18.44.090 UFC Section 11.201.(b) amended--Containers and removal.
Ste. 11.201.(b) of the Uniform Fire Cole concerning Containers and
removal is amended to read as follows:
Sc'. 11.201.(b) COntainers and Removal. Combustible rubbish or waste
material, when kept within or adjacent to a building shall be stored in
approved containers equipped with tight fitting covers or in roans or vaults
constructed of ncnoombustible materials. Metal, metal-limed or other
approved containers with tight-fitting covers shall be provided for oily rags
and similar materials. Combustible rubbish or waste material, unless stored
in approved vaults or roans, shall be removed from the building at least once
each working day.
-13-
There is hereby added to the Salt Lake City Code, Section 18.44.091,
which is to read as follows:
Spc . 18.44.091 UFC Section 11.201.(d) amended--Dumpster and container
location.
Section 11.201.(d) of the Uniform Fire Uccle relating to Dumpster and
container location is amended to read as follows:
Sec, 11.201.(d) Dumpster and Container Location. Dumpsters and
containers with an individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards (40.5 cubic feet) or
greater shall not be stored in buildings or placed outside within 5 feet of
combustible walls, openings or combustible roof eaves lines.
EXCEPTION: Areas containing dumpsters or containers protected by an
approved automatic sprinkler system.
These is hereby added to the Salt Lake City Crr1P, Section 18.44.092,
which is to read as follows:
Sec. 18.44.092 UFC Section 11.301 amended--Reporting of fires.
Section 11.301 of the Uniform Fire Code relating to Reporting of fires is
amended to read as follows:
sec. 11.301. In the event a fire occurs or the discovery of a fire, smoke
or [ ] the releaP of flammable or toxic materials on any property,
the owner or occupant shall immediately report such condition to the fire
department.
A fire shall mean any fire not used for cooking, heating or recreational
purposes or one not incidental to the normal operations of the property.
Section 18.44.100 of the Salt Lake City Code relating to UFC Section
11.201(a) amended--Accumulation of waste materials--Weed control is repealed.
-14-
There is hereby added to the Salt Lake City Code, Section 18.44.100,
which is to read as follows:
Sec. 18.44.100 UFC Section 34.104 amended--Burning operations.
Sec. 34.104. of the Uniform Fire nndp relating to Burning operations is
amended to read as follows:
Sec. 34.104 The burning of wrecked or discarded motor vehicles or of
junk, or of any waste materials is not permitted.
Section 18.44.110 of the Salt Lake City Code relating to UFC Sections
78.102 and 78.103 amended--[ ] Fireworks is amended to read
as follows:
Sec. 18.44.110 UFC Sections 78.102 and 78.103 amended [Section 78.104
added]--Fireworks.
[A ] Sections 78.102 and 78.103 of the Uniform Fire rr-de, relating to
fireworks, are amended to read as follows:
Sec. 78.102. (a) Manufacturing, storage permit. It is unlawful to
manufacture or stare fireworks within the limits of the city by any
person or entity without first obtaining a permit from the Fire Marshal
for such purpose and complying with state and lnnal law. This provision
shall not be construed as prohibiting the storage of fireworks for a
display for which a permit has been granted under the provisions of
public display under (b) below.
(b) Public display permit. (1) It is unlawful to conduct any public
display of fireworks without obtaining a special permit therefore and
fully complying with the provisions of this chapter and these ordinances.
The Fire Marshal, upon written application and the posting of required
insurance, will coordinate the review of the permit by the Fire
-15-
Department, City Attorney, Parks Department and Police Department. After
their approvals the Fire Marshal may grant a permit for public display of
fireworks by responsible groups. No permit granted hereunder shall be
transferable.
(2) Application for permit. The application for a permit to
operate a public display of fireworks shall be made in writing at
least 10 days in advance of the date of the display. It shall be
signed by the applicant and shall contain the following information:
(i) The name of the organization or persons sponsoring
the display, togettar with the name, ages and qualifications of
persons actually in charge of the firing of the display.
(ii) The date and time of the day at which the display is
to be held.
(iii) The exact location planned for the display.
(iv) The number and kinds of fireworks to be discharged.
(v) The manner and plarn of storage of fireworks prior
to the display.
(3) Insurance required. No person or entity shall be issued a
permit for the public display of fireworks unless he/she shall have
insurance in the minimum sum of $250,000/500,000 liability naming
Salt Lake City Corporation as an additional insured. A certificate
of insurance showing proof of the required coverage shall be on file
with the City Recorder's office prior to final permission being
granted by the Mayor and issued by the Chief pursuant to this
article.
-16-
(c) After a permit for the public display of fireworks has been
granted, gales, pas.Ression, iic and distribution of fireworks for such
display shall be lawful for that purpose only.
Sec. 78.103. Requirements for display. (a) Nonhazardous manner. After
a permit for public display has been obtained, such display shall be of a
character, and so located, discharged or fired that it will not create a
hazard to property or endanger any person, and must comply with the
technical sus below.
(b) Firing distance. The actual point at which the fireworks are
to be fired shall be at least: two hundred (200) feet from the nearest
permanent building, public highway or railroad, and fifty (50) feet from
the nearest above ground telegraph, telephone or electric power pole or
line, tree or other overhead obstruction.
(c) Minimum spectator distance. Spectators shall be restrained
behind the lines at least one hundred fifty (150) feet from the point at
which the fireworks are discharged. Only persons in active charge of the
display shall be allowed inside said line.
(d) Vertiral firing required. All fireworks that fire a projectile
shall be so set up that the projectile will go into the air as nearly as
possible in a vertical direction.
(e) Maximum wind velocity. No fireworks display shall be held
during any wind storm in which the wirxl reaches a velocity of thirty (30)
miles or more per hour.
(f) Fire extinguishers. Fire extinguishers shall be provided as
required by the Fire Marshal .
-17-
Section 18.44.120 of the Salt Lake City C'rrie relating to UFC Section
79.115 added--Adulterated liquids as flammable is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 18.44.120 UFC Section [79 115] 79.117 added--Adulterated liquids as
flammable.
Article 79 of the Uniform Fire code, relating to flammable and
combustible liquid is amended by adding thereto a new section [79 115] 79.117
relating to adulterated liquids which shall read as follows:
Sec. [79.115.] 79.117. Adulterated liquid as flammable. ***.
Section 18.44.140 of the Salt Lake City C'rdP relating to UFC Section 79-
508(c) amended--Diked areas is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 18.44.140 UFC Section [79 508(c)] 79.507.(c) amended--Diked areas.
The first [ ' ] paragraph of Section 79.507.(c) of the Uniform
Fire C'rr7P relating to diked areas of drainage tank areas, is amended to read
as follows:
Sec. 79.507.(c) Where protection of adjacent tanks, adjoining property
or waterways is accomplished by retaining the liquid around the tank by means
of a diked area, such dikes shall be at least six inches higher than necessary
to retain the volumetric capacities detailed below in order to provide for
adequate retention of fire fighting foam on the surface of the stored liquid.
Such diked areas shall also comply with the following:
(1) The volumetric capacity of the diked area shall be not less than the
greatest amount of liquid that can be released from the largest tank within
the diked area. In areas containing uru.e than one tank this capacity must be
achieved after deducting the volume of the portions of all tanks that are
below the height of the dike within the diked area. The volumetric capacity
of the diked area for a tank or group of tanks containing crude petroleum with
-18-
boilover characteristics shall be not less than the tank or tanks served by
the enclosure. In areas containing more than one tank this capacity must be
achieved after deducting the volume of the portions of all tanks that are
below the height of the dike within the diked area.
[(2)**+.]
[(3)+** ]
[(4)*".]
[(5)**r.]
[(6)* ".]
[(7)*÷*.]
Section 18.44.150 of the Salt Lake City Crr1P relating to UFC Appendix
III-A amended--Testing fire-extinguishing systems is repealed.
There is hereby added to the Salt Lake City Code, Section 18.44.150,
which is to read as follows:
Sec. 18.44.150 UFC Appendix III-A Section 4 second exception amended--
Fire-flow requirements for buildings.
Appendix III-A Section 4 second exception of the Uniform Fire C'nrie
concerning Fire flow requirements for buildings is amended to read as follows:
Appendix III-A action 4 second exception:
EXCEPTION: The required fire flow may be reduced up to FS] 50 percent
when the building is provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system, but
in no rase less than 1500 gallows per minute.
Section 18.44.160 of the Salt Lake City C`rr3P relating to UFC Appendix I-A
amended--Life safety requirements for existing buildings is repealed.
There is hereby added to the Salt Lake City Code, Section 18.44.160,
which is to read as follows:
-19-
Section 18.44.160 of the Salt Lake City C'rrle relating to UFC Appendix I-A
amended--Life Safety nagitnaments for existing buildings is amended to read as
follows:
Sec. 18.44.160 UFC Appendix thaptpr I-A amended--Life safety
requirements for existing buildings.
Appendix Chapter I-A of the Uniform Fire Code, 1988 Edition., 'elating to
regulations applicable to existing buildings is amended to read as follows:
APPENDIX I-A
Life Safety Requirements to
Existing Buildings [ ]
1. General
(a) Purpose. ***.
EXCEPTION: Group R Division 3 and Group M[, .]
(b) Effective Date.
this appendix, plans for compliance shall be submitted and approved, and
within 18 months thereafter the work shall be completed or the -building
orm.] Existing nonconforming Group R,
Division 1 occupancies shall be made to conform to the requirements of
this appendix immediately or shall be vacated until made to conform.
Existing nonconforming occupancies, other than Group R-1, shall conform
to these requirements if, in the opinion of the chief, they constitute a
distinct hazard to life and property.
2. EXITS -
(a) Number of Exits. ***.
(b) Stair Construction. ***.
(c) Corridors. ***.
-20-
EXCEPTION: Existing corridor walls, ceilings and opening protection not
in compliance with the above may be continued [when such buildings are
.], provided
an approved automatic sprinkler system is provided for all corridors, stairs,
exits and other common areas. Such sprinkler system may be supplied from the
domestic water system if it is of adequate volume and pressure.
(d) Fire Escapes.
1. ***.
2. Fire esrapis shall comply with the following: [ cress- rom
a corridor shall not be through an intervening room.]
All openings within 10 feet shall be protected by three-
fourths-hour ***.
(e) Exit and Fire FcrapP Signs. ***.
3. ENCLOSURE OF VERTICAL SHAFTS
A
Interior vertical shafts, ***.
EXCEPTIONS: 1. ***.
2. Stairways need not be enclosed nor stories separated if an
approved automatic sprinkler system is provided for all corridors,
stairs, exits and other common areas.
3. Vertical openings need not be protected if the entire
building is protected by an approved automatic spu inkler system.
4. BASEMENT ACCESS OR SPRINKLER PROTECTION ***.
5. STANDPIPES ***.
6. SMOKE DETECTORS
(a) General. ***.
(b) Power Source. ***.
-21-
(c) Location Within Dwelling Units. ***.
EXCEPTION: In lieu of the smoke detectors in every dwelling unit,
the smoke detectors may be installed in the corridors and all common
-22-
areas spaced a maximum of 30 feet apart and not more than 15 feet from
any wall.
(d) Location in Efficiency Dwelling Units arx3 Hotels. ***.
EXCEPTION: In lieu of the spoke detectors in every dwelling unit,
the smoke detectors may be installed in the corridors and all common
areas spaced a maximum of 30 feet apart arxi not more than 15 feet faun
any wall.
7. SEPARATION OF OCCUPANCIES
Occupancy separations shall be provided as specified in Section 503 of
the Building Code. Every roan containing a boiler, cenLLdl heating plant
or hot-water supply boiler in Group R Division 1 occupancies shall be
separated fiun the rest of the building by not less than an one-hour
fire-resistive occupancy separation. When approved by the chief,
existing wood lath and plaster in good condition or 1/2-irrh gypsum
wallboard may be acceptable where one-hour occupancy separations are
required.
EXCEPTION: A separation shall not be required for such roans with
equipment serving only one dwelling unit.
8. EXIT ILLUMINATION
Exit illumination shall be as required by the Uniform Building Code,
Section 3313, 1988 edition.
There is hereby added to the Salt Lake City C'nde, Section 18.44.161,
which is to read as follows:
San;. 18.44.161 UFC Article 80--Hazardous Materials.
The Sections of Article 80 of the Uniform Fire Code, as specified herein,
are amended to read as follows:
-23-
1. Page 318, Ste. 80.101, Sod : Add a new Exception 3. after EXCEPTION
2. as follows:
3. For retail display of non-flammable solid and non-flammable or
noncombustible liquid hazardous materials in Group B, Division 2 retail
sales occupancies, see cec. 80.109.
2. ALSO, page 323: Add a new Section 80.109 after Section 80.108 as
follows:
Retail Display
Sec. 80.109. The aggregate quantity of non-flammable solid and non-
flammable or noncombustible liquid hazardous materials permitted within a
single control area of a Group B, Division 2 retail sales occupancy may exceed
the exempt amounts specified in Division III, Tables 80.306-A, 80.309-A,
80.310-A, 80.312-A, 80.314-A and 80.315-A. The maximum allowable quantity in
pounds or gallons permitted within a single control area of a retail sales
occupancy shall be the amount obtained by multiplying the exempt amount
specified in the Division III exempt amount tables by the following density
factor, and then multiplying that product by the square footage of the area.
•
The maximum aggregate floor area for hazardous material retail display or
storage over which the density factor may be applied shall not exceed 1,500
square feet per ctiul area.
Hazard Classification Density Factor
Physical Hazards
Class 4 NOT PEiI'rriu
Cl -an 3 0.075
Class 2 0.006
Class 1 0.003
Health Hazards
All 0.0013
-24-
The area of storage or display shall also amply with the following
requirements:
(a) Display of solids shall not exceed 200 pounds per square foot
of floor area actually occupied by the solid merchandise.
(b) Display of liquids shall not exceed 20 gallons per square foot
of floor area actually occupied by the liquid merchandise.
(c) Display height shall not exceed 6 feet.
(d) Individual containers less than 5 gallons or less than 25
pounds shall be sLured on pallets, racks or shelves.
(e) Storage racks and shelves shall be in accordance with the
provisions of Sec. 80.301 (i).
(f) Containers shall be approved for the llq04 intended.
(g) Individual containers shall not exceed 100 pounds or 5 gallons
capacity.
(h) Inom patible materials shall be separated in accordance with
the provisions of Sec. 80.301(n).
(i) Floors shall be in accordance with the provisions of Sec.
80.301(z).
(j) Aisles 4 feet in width shall be maintained on 3 sides of the
display area.
(k) Hazard identification signs shall be provided in accordance
with the provisions of Sec. 80.104(e).
3. ALSO, page 337, Sec. 80.306(a) Indoor Storage, item 1. : Add an
exception at the end of the paragraph as follows:
EXCEPTION: For retail display of non-flammable solid and non-flammable
or noncombustibae liquid Class 1, 2 and 3 oxidizers, see Sec. 80.109.
-25-
4. ALSO, page 337, Fr. 80.306(a)2., Table No 80.306-A: Delete Class 3
oxidizers from footnotes 1 and 2, and add a new footnote numbered 3 as
follows:
TABLE NO 80.306-A
LIQUID AND SOLID OXIDIZERS1,2'3
EXEMPT AMOUNTS
S
(Table to remain n unchanged. )
-No exempt amounts of Class [3 or] 4 oxidizers are permitted in Group R
occupancies or offices or retail sales portions of Group B occupancies.
exempt anoints of Class [3 or] 4 oxidizers are permitted in Group A,
E, I or M occupancies or in classrooms of Group B occupancies unless sLurage
is within a hazardous material storage cabinet containing no other storage.
maximum quantity of 200 pounds of solid or 20 gallons of liquid Class
3 oxidizers may be permitted in I, M and R occupancies, when such materials
are necessary for maintenance purposes or operation of equipment. The
oxidizers shall be stored in approved containers and in a manner approved by
the Chief.
5. ALSO, page 347, fir. 80.309(a) Indoor Storage, item 1. : Number the
existing Exception "1", and add a new Exception number "2" after the existing
Exception as follows:
EXCEPTIONS: 1Detonatable unstable (reactive) materials shall be stored
in accordance with Article 77.
For retail display of non-flammable solid and non-flammable or
noncombustible liquid unstable (reactive) materials, see Section 80.109.
6. ALSO, page 349, Star. 80.310(a) Indoor Storage, Item 1: Add an
Exception after the paragraph as follows:
-26-
EXCEPTION: For retail display of non-flammable solid and noon-flammable
or noncombustible liquid water-reactive materials, see Section 80.109.
7. ALSO, page 351, Sec. 80.312(a) Indoor Storage, Item 1: Add and
exception after the paragraph as follows:
EXCEPTION: For retail display of noon-flammable solid and noon-flammable
or noncombustible liquid highly toxic materials, see Sec. 80.109.
8. ALSO, page 354, Sr'.Q 80.314(a) Indoor Storage, Item 1: Add an
Exception after the paragraph as follows:
EXCEPTION: For retail display of non-flammable solid and non-flammable
or noncombustible liquid corrosive materials, see SRc. 80.109.
9. ALSO, page 355 SQr. 80.315(a) Indoor Storage, Item 1: Add an
Exception after the paragraph as follows.
EXCEPTION: For retail display of non-flammable solid and noncombustible
or noon-flammable liquid or other health hazard materials, see fir. 80.109.
Sec. 80.101: Add 2 new Exceptions (Exceptions 3. and 4. ) after Exception
2. as follows:
3. The aggregate quantity of non-flammable solid and non-flammable or
noncombustible liquid hazardous materials permitted within a single control
area of a Group B, Division 2 retail sales occupancy may exceed the exempt
amounts specified in Division III, Tables 80.306-A, 80.309-A, 80.310-A,
80.312-A, 80.314-A and 80.315-A. The maximum allowable quantity in pounds or
gallons permitted within a single control area of a retail gales occupancy
- shall be the amount obtained by multiplying the exempt amount specified in the
Division III exempt amount tables by the following density factor, and then
multiplying that product by the square footage of the area. The maximum
aggregate floor area for hazardous material retail display or storage over
-27-
which the density factor may be applied shall not exceed 1,500 square feet per
control area.
Hazard Classification Density Factor
Physic-alHazards
Class 4 NOT PERMr .1`J
Class 3 0.075
Class 2 0.006
Class 1 0.003
Health Hazards
All 0.0013
The area of storage or display shall also comply with the following
requirements:
(a) Display of solids shall not exceed 200 pounds per square foot
of floor area actually occupied by the solid merchandise.
(b) Display of liquids shall not exceed 20 gallons per square foot
of floor area actually occupied by the liquid merchandise.
(c) Display height shall not exceed 6 feet.
(d) Individual containers less than 5 gallons or less than 25
pounds shall be sLured on Pallets, racks or shelves.
(e) Storage racks and shelves shall be in accordance with the
provisions of Ser. 80.301 (i).
(f) Containers shall be approved for the use intended.
(g) Individual containers shall not exceed 100 pounds or 5 gallons
capacity.
(h) Incompatible materials shall be separated in accordance with
the provisions of SPn. 80.301(n).
(i) Floors shall be in ac crdanoe with the provisions of Sec.
80.301(z).
-28-
(j) Aisles 4 feet in width shall be maintained on 3 sidcs of the
display area.
(k) Hazard identification signs shall be provided in accordance
with the provisions of Sec. 80.104(e).
4. A maximum quantity of 200 pounds of solid or 20 gallons of liquid
Class 3 oxidizers may be permitted in I, M and R occupancies, when such
materials are necessary for maintenance purposes or operation of equipment.
The oxidizers shall be stared in approved containers and in a mariner approved
by the Chief.
ALSO, Table 80.306-A: Delete Class 3 oxidizers from Footnotes 1 and 2 as
follows:
-No exempt amounts of Class [3 or] 4 oxidizers are permitted in Group R
occupancies or offices or retail sales portions of Group B occupancies.
2No exempt amounts of Class [3 or] 4 oxidizers are permitted in Group A,
E, I or M occupancies or in classrooms of Group B occupancies unless storage
is within a hazardous material storage cabinet containing no other storage.
Section 18.44.200 of the Salt Lake City Code relating to Abatement
procedures for cleaning real property is repealed.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon the date
of its first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this
day of , 1988.
CHAIRPERSON
-29-
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on
Mayor' s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
ATTEST:
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 1988
Published:
GRH:rc
-30-