The URL can be used to link to this page

07/09/2002 - Minutes (2) PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, DULY 9, 2002 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in a Work Session on Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 5:30 p.m. in Room 326, City Council Office, City County Building, 451 South State Street. In Attendance: Council Members Carlton Christensen, Eric Jergensen, Nancy Saxton, Jill Remington Love, Dave Buhler, Dale Lambert and Van Turner. Absent: Councilmember Dave Buhler Also in Attendance: Mayor Ross C. "Rocky" Anderson; Steven Allred, Acting City Attorney; Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director; D.J. Baxter, Senior Advisor to the Mayor; Archie Archuleta, Administrative Assistant for Minority & Community Affairs; Diana Karrenberg, Community Affairs Manager; Janice Jardine, Council Planning & Policy Analyst; Russell Weeks, Council Policy Analyst; Michael Sears, Council Budget & Policy Analyst; Sylvia Jones, Council Research and Policy Analyst/Constituent Liaison; Marge Harvey, Council Research and Policy Analyst/Constituent Liaison; Roger Evans, Building Services and Licensing Director; Doug Wheelwright, Land Use & Transportation/Subdivisions Planner; Karen Wiley, Grant Financial Administrator; Sandi Marler, Community Development Program Specialist; Ray McCandless, Northwest Quadrant/Subdivisions Planner; Wayne Mills, Urban Design/Alleys Planner; Joel Paterson, Special Projects Planner; Dan Mule' , City Treasurer; Kelly Murdock, Wells Fargo Bank; Nancy Tessman, Library Director and Pam Johnson, Deputy City Recorder, were present. Councilmember Christensen presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 5:32 p.m. AGENDA ITEMS #1. REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INCLUDING REVIEW OF COUNCIL INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. Cindy Gust-Jenson said Council had brought up additional concerns on the proposed zoning ordinance amendment which allowed certain encroachment within side yard setback areas. She said this item was scheduled as unfinished business. She said Council staff had prepared a handout giving Council Members options which could be used in making their motion. She said Council Members could return to Work Session for further discussion. See File M 01-5 for Council announcements. #2. INTERVIEW REVEREND PATRICK CARLEY PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE SISTER CITIES BOARD. Reverend Carley said as a member of the Hibernian Society in Salt Lake City, he was instrumental in acquiring the Sister City status for his hometown in Ireland. He said in working toward that goal, he had come to appreciate the benefits of the Sister Cities program. #3. INTERVIEW ROSEMARY HOLT PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HER APPOINTMENT TO THE SISTER CITIES BOARD. Ms. Holt said she had been involved with the Sister City in the Ukraine for 13 years. She said she first became involved in a humanitarian capacity. #4. INTERVIEW KENDALYN HARRIS PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HER RE-APPOINTMENT TO THE 02 - 1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, DULY 9, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD. Ms. Harris said educating herself with City issues was what she had enjoyed the most during her involvement with the board. She said learning about these issues and getting involved helped her make decisions which would benefit the residents. #5. RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING THE UTA/UP PETITIONS RELATING TO LOCATING AN INTERMODAL FREIGHT LOADING FACILITY IN AN AREA ZONED M-1. This item was pulled from the agenda. #6. RECEIVE A FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING REGARDING OBSTRUCTIONS IN SIDE YARDS. No discussion was held. #7. RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING A REQUEST THAT 500 SOUTH BE GIVEN THE HONORARY NAME OF CESAR CHAVEZ BOULEVARD FROM 500 WEST TO 700 EAST (PETITION NO. 400-01-46) . View Attachment Marge Harvey, Janice Jardine and Archie Archuleta briefed the Council from the attached handout. Councilmember Jergensen asked if the Council had been briefed on this item before. Ms. Harvey said the original proposal dated back to August of 2001. She said it had taken time to go through the process, but this was the first time the petition had come before the Council. Councilmember Turner asked if street signage would be replaced, and if the cost would fall on the City. Ms. Harvey said additional street signs would be attached to current ones. She said the City would have no additional costs. She said the petitioners would pay for the new street signs. #8. RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING A TEXT AMENDMENT REQUESTED BY THE SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY. View Attachment Joel Paterson, Doug Wheelwright, Russell Weeks, Janice Jardine and Nancy Tessman briefed the Council from the attached handouts. Councilmember Christensen asked why a text amendment was needed. Mr. Paterson said the text amendment addressed height issues on public lands. He said it would allow the Library block to use the height restrictions of an adjacent zoning district. He said the ordinance amendment would expand use of accessory retail sales for the benefit of library patrons and the general public. He said the amendment allowed amphitheaters and live performance theaters as conditional use on public lands. Councilmember Jergensen said museums or specialty learning shops would be desirable for the Library block location. He said he was concerned that rezoning public lands would open other areas for retail sales as well. Mr. Paterson said the ordinance could be written to address this location specifically. Councilmember Jergensen said he was concerned even specialty shops would compete with downtown retail. Mr. Paterson said the shops would be accessory uses for patrons inside the Library. He said no advertising would be done to make other retailers compete with these shops. Councilmember Jergensen asked what types of retailers expressed interest in this location. Ms. Tessman said the retailers would be newsstands, coffee shops, media industry, non-profit organizations and artisans. Councilmember Love said the community was concerned that retail at Library Block would become another source of competition for Main Street. She said strict and specific zoning regulations needed to be established to eliminate this. Ms. Tessman said the 02 - 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, DULY 9, 2002 goal was to create a supportive environment to the Library. Councilmember Lambert asked what process was needed to provide such restrictions. Mr. Paterson said language modification in the zoning use chart would be easiest. He said Council could make that decision without the proposal going back to the Planning Commission. Councilmember Lambert asked if amphitheatres were currently allowed in this zone. Mr. Paterson said a text amendment was needed to allow the size of the amphitheatres in the proposal. Mr. Weeks said commercial space in the Library represented opportunity to provide support and services to the Library, staff and its patrons. He said preference would be given to unique applicants which would have a non-profit or community based focus. Councilmember Saxton said she was interested in reviewing proposed income from the commercial locations. She said she was concerned non-profit organizations would eventually be turned away in favor of retailers that would pay rent. Ms. Tessman said some revenue would be needed to help fund many of the programs provided by the Library. Councilmember Turner said surrounding restaurants and businesses would benefit from Library block. He said with light rail available, additional amenities would be a way of drawing and keeping patrons from all over the valley. Council asked for another briefing to be scheduled prior to moving this item forward. Council asked that strict and site specific zoning language be added to the text amendment requested by the City Library. Councilmember Love asked that the administration be advised of the updated information. #9. RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 8 AND RELATED GRANT RESOLUTIONS. This item was pulled from the agenda. The meeting adjourned at 7:47 p.m. pj 02 - 3 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: July 2,2002 SUBJECT: Petition No.400-01-46—Request by the Salt Lake Committee to Honor Cesar E. Chavez to give 500 South the honorary name of Cesar Chavez Boulevard from 500 West to 700 East. STAFF REPORT BY: Marge Harvey,Constituent Liaison/Policy and Research Analyst Document Type Budget-Related Facts Policy-Related Facts Miscellaneous Facts Resolution The proposal has no There is no City The Administration has budget impact. The ordinance governing clearly stated the petitioner has agreed to honorary street name positive aspects of the cover the cost of changes.Council proposal. installing 26 overhead Members may wish to and 3 residential street consider adopting a signs, (approx. $2700). previous policy and procedure that was in effect from 1989-1995. OPTIONS AND MOTIONS: Additional options may be identified at the Council Work Session on July 9,2002. 1. ["I move that the Council"] Adopt a resolution approving the honorary street name of "Cesar Chavez Boulevard"for a portion of 500 South between 500 West and 700 East. 2. ["I move that the Council"] Not adopt a resolution approving the honorary street name of"Cesar Chavez Boulevard"for a portion of 500 South between 500 West and 700 East. 3. ["I move that the Council"] Adopt a resolution approving the honorary street name of"Cesar Chavez Boulevard"for a portion of 500 South between 500 West and 700 East and adopt the proposed policy and procedures for"honorary"or"preference"street name requests as part of the City Council's Office policies. KEY ELEMENTS A. The Salt Lake Committee to Honor Cesar E.Chavez sent a letter to Mayor Anderson dated August 9,2001, stating they would like to honor Cesar Estrada Chavez,co-founder of the United Farm Workers of America(AFL-CIO),because many Utahans,particularly those of Hispanic origin,have been beneficiaries of Chavez's far-reaching influence in raising the conscience of the nation concerning civil rights violations through non-violent action. B. The necessary City divisions and departments,including the Planning Division, Engineering Division,Property Management Division,Transportation Division,Public 1 Utilities Department,Police Department and Fire Department,have reviewed the honorary street name proposal. All divisions and departments recommended approval. C. On March 22,2002, a public notice was sent out to all Community Council Chairs and property owners potentially affected by the honorary street name change. One positive letter was received in response to the notice. D. There is no City ordinance governing preference or honorary street name changes. The City Attorney's Office prepared and approved the necessary resolution. Planning Commission action is not required. An advertised public hearing is not required for a preference or honorary street name change. The Council has elected to hold hearings on past honorary changes. A public hearing has tentatively been scheduled on the Council's agenda for August 6,2002. E. In 1989,the City established by Executive Order a policy and procedure to provide a process for"honorary"or"preference"street name change requests. The City had received several requests for street name changes that were more for preference(high school mascots,family and business names)than for the elimination of duplication or confusion in locating an address. The County was in the process of establishing the E-911 emergency telephone system and the policy of allowing an honorary versus legal street name provided huge cost savings by not having to change legal addresses. The policy established a process to objectively evaluate such requests and allow a street to be named as a matter of preference or historical significance,but not change the legal street address. A filing fee of $250 was established by ordinance. F. In 1995 the City's Policies and Procedures Manual was revised in order to reduce the size, provide clarity,and remove unnecessary or outdated information. The honorary or preference street name change policy and procedure was repealed as part of the revision. Council Members may wish to consider adopting a portion of the previous policy and procedure as part of the Council's Office Policies. A copy of the 1989 policy and procedure is attached for Council Member's consideration. CHRONOLOGY: Please refer to the Administration's transmittal for a complete chronology of events relating to the proposed text amendment. • September 3,2001 Petition assigned to Planning • March 22,2002 Pre-hearing notice sent to all Community Council Chairs and abutting property owners cc: Rocky Fluhart,David Nimkin,Chief Dinsie,Chief Querry,LeRoy Hooton,Margaret Hunt,Rick Graham, David Dobbins,Tim Harpst,Max Peterson,Stephen Goldsmith,Brent Wilde,Doug Wheelwright,Jackie Gasparik,Archie Archuleta,Janice Jardine File Location: Community and Economic Development Dept.,Planning Division,Petition 400-01-46, Cesar Chavez Boulevard Honorary Street Name Change 2 • SALT LAKE CITY POLICY MANUAL Effective Date Number EXECUTIVE ORDER 6.03.500 1 , Subject STREET NAME CHANGES Reference Rescinds Amends Distribution Re-evaluation Date ALL DEPARTMENTS Authority: PALMER A. DEPAULIS, MAYOR No.Pages Signature 3 I. POLICY It is the policy of Salt Lake City Corporation to name and number the streets of Salt Lake City in a way that eliminates duplication and other confusion which would impact the provision of emergency services. It is further the policy of Salt Lake City Corporation to evaluate re- quests for street name changes systematically and objec- tively. • II. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE The purpose of this Executive Order is to establish the guidelines and procedure by which requests for street name changes will be evaluated. The objective of this Order is to provide clear and concise direction to all those involved in the naming of City streets. III. DEFINITIONS 1. Street - Any street within the corporate boundaries of Salt Lake City. 2. Preference Request - Any request for a street name change requested as a matter of preference rather than those which are essential for eliminating dupli- cation and other confusion which would impact the provision of emergency services. 3. Street Name Change - Any redesignation of a street, including official and honorary changes. EXECUTIVE ORDER - STREET NAME CHANGES 6.03. 500 PAGE 2 IV. PETITION INFORMATION A. Street name changes requested to clarify location to more efficiently provide services will be processed according to Executive Order Number 6.03.200. Non- preference requests must be submitted to the Office of the City Engineer. B. Street name changes requested as a matter of preference must be submitted to the Office of the Director of Community and Economic Development. A valid petition for a preference request street name change will include: 1. An explanation of how the requested street name will be compatible with adjacent streets and location, historical character or theme. 2. Written proof of notification of the utility companies, the State Department of Transporta- tion, the Salt Lake County Address Coordinator, and the U.S. Post Office of the petition. 3. A non-refundable application fee for processing the preference request of $250 payable upon submission of the request. V. CRITERIA Review of any preference request will include but not be limited to the following criteria: 1. Signatures of at least 75 percent of the abutting property owners and, when the property is not owner occupied, occupants. 2. The cost of the impact on public/private utilities, business and property owners for revisions to comput- er databases, billing systems, legal documents, stationery, and other elements of business opera- tions. 3. Simplicity for the E-911 emergency system. 4. Compatibility with adjacent streets: location and historical character or theme. 5. Ease of locating the street for people new to or unfamiliar with the area. EXECUTIVE ORDER - STREET NAME CHANGES 6 . 03 . 500 PAGE 3 VI. PROCESS AND RESPONSIBILITIES Responsibility Action Applicant Submit a complete petition (See Section IV, above) . Community & Economic 1. Accept application and fee. Development 2. Distribute application to the following departments: a. Building & Housing b. Engineering c. Fire uP''3e4- d. Planning & Zoning e. Transportation f. Public Utilities Departments Review application based upon the criteria identified in Section V, above. Return recommendation to Department of Community & Economic Development within five working days. Community & Economic 1. Review recommendations. Development 2. Forward petition information and staff recommendation through the Mayor's Office, to the City Council in conformance with Executive Order Number 2.01.200. City Council 1. Schedule public hearing concerning petition. VII. ADDITIONAL COSTS Upon approval of any preference request for an honorary or official name change, the petitioner will be responsible for reimbursing the City for the actual cost of implement- ing the changes including any costs of updating official documents which exceed the petition fee of $250 and purchase and installation of all applicable street signs. In cases when the new street name signs are a target for rivalries or mementos, for example high school mascot designations, the petitioner will be responsible for reimbursing the City for the replacement of missing or damaged street signs. { .eeo 'attr- APR 2 2002 SALT' 1 - ITT GORPORATIMI MARGARET HUNT = ROSS C. "ROCKY" ANDERSON DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAYOR COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL� /NN, - y TO: Rocky Fluhart, Chief Administrative OfficeiI DATE: April 29, 2002 FROM: Margaret"Hunt,,CED Dire tqr RE: Petition #400-01-46:A request by the Salt Lake Committee to Honor Cesar E. Chavez, requesting that 500 South be given an honorary name of Cesar Chavez Boulevard from 500 West to 700 East. STAFF CONTACT: Jackie O. Gasparik, 535-6354 DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution BUDGET IMPACT: None—the petitioner has agreed to cover the cost of installing the 26 overhead and three residential street signs. The Public Services Department estimates the cost of producing the signs and installation to be approximately $2700. DISCUSSION: The committee sent a letter to Mayor Anderson dated August 9, 2001, which explained that they would like to honor Cesar Estrada Chavez because many Utahans, particularly those of Hispanic origin, have been beneficiaries of Chavez's far- reaching influence. Cesar E. Chavez, cofounder of the United Farm Workers of America (AFL- CIO), raised the conscience of a nation through non-violent action about civil rights violations. He has received awards for his work, such as Mexico's Aztec Eagle, and the USA's Presidential Medal of Freedom. Analysis: The honorary street name change proposal package has been reviewed by the necessary City division and departments, including the Planning Division, Engineering Division, Property Management Division, Transportation Division, Public Utilities Department, Police Department, and Fire Department (see attached review letters). All divisions and departments have recommended approval. The City Attorney's Office has prepared and approved the necessary resolution, which is attached, and it is ready for City Council action. Planning Commission action is not required. 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH B41 1 1 TELEPHONE: 801-535-6230 FAX: B01-535-6005 ®aecrcco anPea Public Process: On March 22, 2002, a public notice was sent out to all Community Council Chairs and property owners potentially affected by the honorary street name change. The notice stated that the Salt Lake City Planning Division is currently reviewing a proposal submitted by the committee. The petitioner is requesting approval to add an honorary street name of Cesar Chavez Boulevard to 500 South from 500 West to 700 East. Potentially affected property owners will also be given a mailed notice of a future public hearing before the City Council to consider the honorary street designation. One positive letter was received in response to the notice, and approval of the honorary street name designation is recommended. Mayor Anderson has also reviewed this proposal and enthusiastically supports it. Relevant Ordinance(s): 1. Salt Lake City Planning Division 6.03.50 Street Name Change Policy and Procedure. 2. State Code Request for action to vacate, 10-8-8.1. ET.SEQ. narrow, or change name of street or alley. Petition 400-01 -46 HONORARY STREET NAME CHANGE OF 5TH SOUTH (Between 7TH E to 3RD W) TO CESAR CHAVEZ 6OULERARD l00 5 w w I- 200 s -1 Illg i LLU 'C i 0 1- 300 5 w i 0 W p ,- ! i O (L 0 Lo ti) - ,_ i i 0 3 SCOTT M. 400 S i i M MATHESON CITY 4 SLC i II STATE COUNTY PUBLIC i COURTHOUSE BUILDING LIBRARY 500 SOUTH I j TROLLEY w SQUARE 600 5 i i j I 3 O 0 i i N I-- V i i 0 U) w j i o 700 5 �f' Z 0 Q" i 1 Q w j i C.") 0 800 $ i i N I j 1 TABLE OF' CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Chronology Resolution Notice of City Council Public Hearing Mailing Labels and List Pre-hearing Notice and Public Response Letter(s) Departmental Comments Original Petition Packet - , : . CHRONOLOGY CHRONOLOGY • September 3, 2001 Petition assigned to planning, • September 3, 2001 Petition assigned to Jackie Gasparik, • September 7, 2001 Petition routed to departments for review, • September 28, 2001 E-mail from David Dobbins to Archie Archuleta, stating that we are waiting for more information and payment of the fees before we can proceed on the petition, • September 28, 2001 E-mail from Archie stating that the petition has been postponed because of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, • November 12, 2001 E-mail from David to Archie reminding him that we are waiting to receive the official, signed petition request, • March 6, 2002 E-mail from Jackie to Archie stating that she needs the petition letter with the signatures that he has, and the fees paid immediately because the petition is seven months old, without any action from the petition, • March 6, 2002 Received copy of petitioner's letter with all but one signature, decided to process petition without final signature, • March 22, 2002 Prepared mailing list, and sent out the pre-hearing notice to all community council chairs and abutting property owners, • March 22, 2002 Applicant paid fees, • March 27, 2002 Sent transmittal to Lynn Pace for preparation of Resolution, • March—April 2002 Prepared transmittal. RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. OF 2002 (Changing the Name of 500 South,between 500 West and 700 East, on an honorary basis to "Cesar Chavez Boulevard,"Pursuant to Petition No. 400-01-46.) WHEREAS, Salt Lake City has received Petition No. 400-01-46 relating to the change of name of 500 South, on an honorary basis, between 500 West and 700 East; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there is good cause to change the name of said street on an honorary basis, without changing the official name or designation of said street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. That the name of 500 South between 500 West and 700 East shall be and hereby is changed on an honorary basis to "Cesar Chavez Boulevard." 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2002. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER G RESOLUTT\Resolution Changing Name on Honorary Basis doc (/ / 'QZ - _ R NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Posted By NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is currently reviewing Petition #400-01-46 initiated by The Committee to honor Cesar E. Chavez, requesting that 500 South be given an honorary street name of Cesar E. Chavez Boulevard from 500 West to 700 East. The City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition request. During this hearing, the Planning staff will present information on the petition and anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: PLACE: ROOM 315 City and County Building 451 South State Street Salt Lake City If you have any questions relating to this proposal,please attend the meeting or call Jackie Gasparik at 535-0562, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. MAILING LABELS AND LIST SALT LAKE TY CORPORATION .. GIS Ma Application Printed on: 09/07/2001 „ . .. „ . , ,L_Jj_i_i__I-i i I ..., , _ 400 , 1, II _ ...111111 : 11 L......._ . _ L1J, .., ., -— — •,,,•4.-e,-'„,c,• • '0. ',,,.'".',,,„,''• :-!."•,, ,.x:cm.43. I LU :,1/1•41— LLJ ,,,,,41,„.,,,,:,%,,,,,,,,f..-'°,-/„./ ,,,,,,'',,,,%,- '-,,,z,,'i'''',-"44:.,-•,',-':'..-,• r NMI ,''''C''''' `0,,..r• , 7 tgyot-t, -",,',,r' •:, r-.2.,,,,ri,...-:-.,„ ..,,,,,,,;',0.,...:- .•-•;;,:..,.,'.4,01;4„,,,,,,,,„„, 14,R.if,l, 14fr-P9'-,,...0°.' . " ,, .4191 .1k•,,,,,•04.11,14,,A1"1,,,,-.„.,1-,..:'ti,,,,,',1--1....,,.,-,,,:,,,‘,,,1;,,,'1,'411."•-, , , ,I ir" ;:,,r;A.,-r-‘.•WO-41,40 %.1,.',...W4,..,-,til:',7to:',"''4",j, Ila-;'-'7-", _ -4""›-Y:-- •-', A.,41'1,1`11-41,„',",. .,z,,=11t,r.,',1,N 1'1 FP 1117771111 I11 „ ii , , 1 1 - , , ,:' :',.;' ', :WV, ar — ,,,,,,e,,,, I.,. , . ‘.'',..,:Y,. • , ,, , '''4;',.' ,. . , ,,,`..,,,,,-"'":.';.-.:,:,..',,,,,,, ',,L.,..'-',!',"!,, :,;,.,..;',:; ;;;"--,,,,,',,,." -,, ':,;,! .;,-;,„,,---;,,,,,,. ,-, . , ,.. • ...,,‘i-w.,,,i- :---- `,, • -', ,v--,,-'4.-4.,,Vx,,,,,,,,,,z,...--,-1 1 -,,El L,0 0 0 n 0 Z I DI" ra I.CIO 0.13. .. 1 11ZCI'''CI Do CI ,1,1II4141k11k 1j °CI:718 '216'0 I- --- 11...111..',1,1113,11 I Fin 11-111-111171'1,11'1.',1111 ..., -CI 0 11111'4',10.0111 0—, 0 oca.C11 , 1'1 -1 . ---1 I 11 1 II I II I , .I 1 1 I I i I 1 1 I 1 II 1 .1 1.1 1,,jj m CALIFORNIA STATE AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIP PEACHTREE COMPANY N V TROLLEY HOLDINGS LLC 100 VAN NESS AVE 1875: EDLEEN DR 115 W WASHINGTON ST Suite Suite Suite 1320 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102- TARZANA, CA 91356- INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204- DDR FAMILY CENTERS LP HERMES ASSOCIATES LTD EAST DOWNTOWN LLC 3300 ENTERPRISE PARK' 3300 ENTERPRISE PARK' P 0 BOX 42121 Suite Suite Suite BEACHWOOD, OH 44122- BEACHWOOD, OH 44122- PORTLAND, OR 97242- IMADA,JOHN M;TR PROTEAN PROPERTIES INC A J LURAS LEASING LC 90 E FORT UNION BLVD 230 E 3900 S 5778 S UTAHNA DR Suite 200 Suite Suite MIDVALE, UT 84047-1567 MURRAY, UT 84107-1531 MURRAY, UT 84107-5928 D E MOSS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MUSTANG PROPERTIES, LLC UWC ASSOCIATES 64 E WINCHESTER ST 466 S 400 E 515 S 400 E Suite 130 Suite 201 Suite MURRAY, UT 84107-7202 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3325 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3501 BOYER-MADSEN SEVENTH EAST LC TROLLEY CORNERS SOUTHRIDGE FINANCIAL INC 127 S 500E 127 S 500E 466 S 500 E Suite 310 Suite 100 Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102-1980 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102-1975 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102-2705 W AUDREY ALLISON FAMILY PARTNERSHIF B& F ASSOCIATES WEBB, THAES JR;TR ET AL 525 S 500 E 370 E 500 S 466 E 500 S Suite Suite 100 Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102-2715 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3318 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3342 BOLDT, GLEN&SALLY V;JT UTAH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PACE, W EARL&DEAN G(TC) 504 E 500 S 540 E 500 S 715 E 500 S Suite Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102-2707 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102-2707 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102-2905 T H A INVESTMENTS, LTD PACE, DEAN& EARL THE PINES, LLC 424 S 700 E 4300 S HIGHLAND DR 2275 E PARLEYS TER Suite Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102-2864 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84124-3504 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84109-1537 WILSON, KATHRYN C&TED L;JT MCRAE,ALICE; ET AL DENVER STREET PROPERTIES LLC 587 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD PO BOX 521987 2136 S SCENIC DR Suite Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84103-4245 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84152-1987 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84109-1429 SALT LAKE CITY CORP NESLEN, ROBERT PROSPERITY ENTERPRISES LLC 451 S STATE ST 2161 S REGENT ST 1218 W 4365 S Suite 245 Suite 7 Suite 4B SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3102 SOUTH SALT LAKE, UT 84115-27i TAYLORSVILLE, UT 84123-2450 WORKMAN, STANLEY R&BARBARA;JT EAST DOWNTOWN LLC CAHOON, KENNETH L R& PETER S; JT 8418 S 4590 W 1555 W 2200 S 1743 S 800 W Suite Suite B Suite •ST JORDAN, UT 84088-4794 WEST VALLEY, UT 84119-1454 WOODSCROSS, UT 84087- . . T-L 7 1 g 0 N.- al MINI Donate m o n nu o Bannon nu ourio 013 P. natioaD no 0000 FA ri °ammo DO 000DOOD 0011000153a 1313 0 " Mar-Can 0000000 Da 013 a '',-; - II, EM 0 CIOD 0 0 0- y- —,`,7-:" 00 a ' - ' na3 am oucI nonnon II 111513111 lo ammo ''.-,--,-',.,::-..:- '; :.::-...,',.., . )— -10"•1111.1.10ii,,---,,,, , ,,,, ,, ,..,....= _____, „___,....* Clun0013000mgr9000 00003U T . :„--,'--, , ,t'.R1"- -..- -:;:- —0 — -0E10 1:100 - ---noonon MI , El....I '-_,. I i'41,',:::' `,-: , Lip I -',.:: 1 _ : ' i I ...M..... :1311 It,ri, .... ' ',.'.7.; Z = -, - E-i o 1. mr....,'; ,,-' '''.,v c.-- ..,?... ,-.:::: ,•:,-2,.: 1 9 0 MI 1---i 0 ,... E-, )---1 g - u , g ocz (-0 ,_, iril , u _ -73,-.--,1111 I ii,„ ii ill , -H ,,...,,,,,,,,r,,,,.4,. .,.,-4,,,,-,.,:>,,,,cy.,•:,...,,,,---,-!--,:',. '-'-'4A',,-- l.../ Mill= RUIN (f) ,-;1--",,,„,---*-,---,--,„vs,. e4--,-,,,f,-1. -1.1;. '54,--A4,,,,„1,.-,:t:.-,e:1, ri IIINI „:„.,_,..z.,1 mai--,-1,474,- rw Mall 1111110 7 '-Zzi.:'1...„,•.,.",./.1-,:i4f-7,-.2'10-,,,',.- -,r---,54--.:.,;-'1..,.- gf,-..-'---j--,-t- - 1 II -,;:,-ky.„.-z. z,....-1, .....*-,t -,i7 .., ,t. _ giVIS -4,-;.1'..kfAl‘-':.-,«--F.1,14-51*Sait-,,e-,-.,„-:•:-,-.=.0 *AA,1 r ' -0-1-V- i...,----, ,4' -,'''',,,e,"."`M.,,,1*,..•..1 Z"-,-'... :,,,„,."'' -' 1 F-'417. .„..41°'44.',-..K^", :4%*%',."4q.,?•,v'';'*:-AT141-''',,I*Vf.41r.',44041 r o.!-*,...,:k a...:1,i...4-43.1,47.5.cili'-.3.• :-...--nzo„ti,.-.4T5 --zri.,,,,,,--1,,,,,,,,,,,e4 :;•-i, 1-',f titr-:-.74,-,.-, _ 1-124, kerVi7-3 I. -•,-,.,...-,- ---..,-klA',.:-54'. ."..4-' ,-;f:-'..,t'.--;;LIA.,„e=ft.M.: ' MANN, WILLARD C. IPAKTCHIAN, HERSH MUTUAL VENTURES CORP 3037 NE 18TH AVE 344 N MAIN ST 525 S 300 E Suite Suite Suite iiTLAND, OR 97212-3357 LAYTON, UT 84041-2206 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3508 MACCALL HOLDINGS, LLC FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF UTAI SANONE, LOUIE J 455 E 300 S 330 E 400 S 206 E 500 S Suite 201 Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-2606 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-2928 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3204 POULSEN, KENNETH J & EARL A(JT) SANONE, LOUIE J &CANNELL, JOSEPH S;J JONES, DOYLE L 210 E 500 S 212 E 500 S 226 E 500 S Suite Suite A Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3281 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3204 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3283 BEEHIVE BAIL BONDS ASPEN PARTNERSHIP,THE FRESHMAN ENTERPRISES 268 E 500 S 332 E 500 S 353 E 500 S Suite Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 1 1-3204 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3309 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3315 EIGHTH CORP OF CH OF JC OF LDS LITTLE AMERICA HOTEL CORP SINCLAIR OIL CORP 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST PO BOX 30825 PO BOX 30825 Suite Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150-0002 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84130-0825 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84130-0825 411kLAIR OIL CORP SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION STATE BUILDING OWNERSHIP AUTHORIT' PO BOX 30825 PO BOX 30825 450 N STATE ST Suite Suite Suite 4110 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84130-0825 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84130-0825 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-1104 STATE OF UTAH DIVISION OF FAC CONSTR 350 EAST ASSOCIATES, LC SALT LAKE CITY 450 N STATE ST 215 S STATE ST 451 S STATE ST Suite N4111 Suite 900 Suite 345 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-1104 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-2300 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3102 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION GARFF FAMILY LLC 451 S STATE ST 451 S STATE ST 531 S STATE ST Suite Suite 345 Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3104 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3102 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3596 GARFF FAMILY LLC DT-#9 LLC CASHMORE, JAY W&SUSAN P;TRS 531 S STATE ST 3995 E ALPINE VALLEY CIR 1841 E WILD WILLOW LN Suite Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3596 SANDY, UT 84092-6046 SANDY, UT 84093-1479 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION GIS Map Application Printed on: 09/07/2001 A L , [I I I L ji ,r a-; ;fw'i`,.'�-_,'_t„;::: ;'2;,"d:" "r'w'i%r;.":Aw . " .iki; ,l',,'i,; ;i't�.ta �?5, :':,.�x'r',,,� ` ,> "; �?wv ,,R•,.ii,i"f ,. -.`'a.,,e cs t a{•,, '2,N1-.:t ,,�.' �`i„ry p `&wt,2ci«.M^;' �r,.�7.`S'Y',"„t'S2%'vx'`r ^`';, .�a,N ,,9r�e_'zL' rk 4,�"�«.=e.��,, nn K�, ,,.� k,:,.'r+ t k., n,YPy 'off, P t s .0 '' ^rr �`,":t {,,. ,�*,x« .,y+. =?.a..?`,tx^N 4a. 3tr;"� ,-.,',-, - x "a. s`,?',, a ,� a ,,,,,y,0,..::-N, ',, .h",'.V Mq"�',"w 1 " .><`a r,, :',1�%k`�,`'y,^ '"i. ,Y1..:.' �1 'k"µ...i�' ,,,,,, ..0 t, „v�:',°�:-arc,._'„ix ,,,,.�:r :x�rvu'> A 4 ,..i,,....,.V,M,,es..::n-'r: i"''W .,"1"k.".;; y1-,efsi,;.{W!'..`,,,,;'..;:.r.. .1.ft;5;''zt`'.. dr:.19, by�_"•y"+., -_�',°M:044 it '''' ° a " r _ ,`s+',,,„„a ',»�y.t r.'z,4:1- `t" ,t yy"i.."4 s i ,+ t° ",` n. I ',,r' -„l''''',,-.,1`1x".,r'P''''�'riyatti+>s"�g, r „ „*' ATM',r at � G'�w; q.'A. *-14,`tr' "y ; p ,,,, a wi ,g'tr. ,, Ivy'; `;:9?z:"w„ :: ,wtw,:", �a, ,r�" �', ,� r, r,,, :yew 5�.''*'"�"s ,';#.,.. eta' ,.'" � „Xns .'ra r K4 '"�< °C ^L Rh"7„ r^ x� 0a" y:.„ .a , , Y�iT IY-s;r':"..,,;15` 2.s' w„,., i,., ,,>y-'i;"„, i,,5„'l,u,.. K � ,..„ „4..4t„v7' '<r: :i<•z„.i ' i..`_ ,w..4",..c .:.2"fr^".S .,.,riI»yn.+y„ ,ntir ,. r-r,'.�i:,,^.,,k..=t-a„a. ry,�,. d a , , ,...„kt" k iti•,"., p;ex4 r.h '.' " 1,4111; s �'4,1, ,,,z:' ' ; ,qi , , f ,� ;xr ' `1;' "�,""t5t Yiar, n w sn t„ .+, <" "a1,;.',yx"'' �,'?' -" µ;ry' '"s .p,,a... $,sAd " i I n's.4. ;:.;4'', ,'-4.„�, ,+„ �;s.. .„,rk;..:r `,.?- ,4''.;,4 nM1.011,^,4,„.^ f:. .i,w r� ' , rr°' "*'.. v4?`? G;f 4 k A a«:r 7r' dd s " , „i ='`"«;'e ''' ''''''''''' jar, 111 k� , � a.„I` tx, u „», , �y 1 ^ lti, Pl�yM. 9,+Stew ,,,,, ..w, m* _ . „i; ,,, ,, „7 Huh A : "t: •t„' Y'`! 2�'f i ',,,txf '.a':''...� ",,:kg'':- 't'i�rzi� r„ .„',,+'.'.'.. ,,,:u:}"'?"r'. , _ ! . , ,A;ty,,,OV,`,.‘, t'''''. r% �;.,5„f,I s,.�r=`i S..iw,a^ ;it!� .k;." (y,1' '"... 41111 ) ] ? FIT) J _ 4L....d 1 M. SUNSTONE OP PROPERTIES LLC LARCH, CHARLES R CHASE MANHATTAN BANK,TR 903 CALLE AMANECER P 0 BOX 5825 P 0 BOX 81290 Suite Suite Suite 0 CLEMENTE, CA 92673-6212 DENVER, CO 80217- CHICAGO, IL 60681--029 AFFILIATED EQUITIES REAL ESTATE LIMITE PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO CHEVRON OIL CO 353 W LANCASTER AVE PO BOX 358 PO BOX 285 Suite Suite Suite WAYNE, PA 19087- BORGER,TX 79008- HOUSTON,TX 77001- CHEVRON U S A INC PRICE, MARGARET H LTD; ET AL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INC PO BOX 285 1363 S 1300E 490 E 500 S Suite Suite Suite HOUSTON,TX 77001- SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2554 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3313 X/SLC LLC 260 JOINT VENTURE DESERET NEWS PUBLISHING CO & KEARI' 230 W 500 S 2159 S 700E 143 S MAIN ST Suite Suite 200 Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101-2309 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106-1878 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1924 WILKINS, LARRY L; ET AL WILKINS, LARRY; ET AL MCDONALDS CORP 3243 E MCKELL CT 3243 E MCKELL CT 1877 E MRRY HLLDY RD Suite Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84121-6910 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84121-6910 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84117-0000 1111kRAS, CONSTANCE K&JAMES S;TRS LITTLE AMERICA HOTEL CORP LITTLE AMERICA HOTEL CORP 529 E NORTHMONT WY PO BOX 30825 PO BOX 30825 Suite Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84103-3324 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84130-0825 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84130-0825 SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF UTAH 550 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST 4501 S 2700 W Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102-1098 TAYLORSVILLE, UT 84119-5928 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION GIS Map Application Printed on: 03/08/2002 71 RAALfl �, 'l.4,,',i'1d`y rovr�:P.:"`,ka y,s, a¢ " t'i4 i ,124s ,/,'-, q 4. dnJ ,rAryra ,,-).,A k i„ + t`Y ' 4 . �,;'',,-''', ,' "u,�} yy', v.,-,' ,'1 '.:5 ,m ,_,, ,.Jaiye ,' y.1" mow4 G f� 'yr oV r y » ,o.} "r dy �y , e ` , „ w or ' n,'... ' ar.,, - �,," . " `v 7 ' Rr ,' .' vr 1r. g,.„,•. , .' �;''r„ ,, ",„ }WG�,.." rc°r t, ysav, , ' r+ a- 4. '' .*, ,,,Zt dl.k rr,� a,, ' ,A',,',.' ,'"'?", '� Y..,u'v,,C',ri ,,-. ,I,,'ix"; . raa" t a ;r,+ ..,," °��.,,.1;.°�,"k, ,r`�' � ' "«un A, , „»+C+ z,a ,, � � �:� �`.xJ Jt�t ,`.r,a ,:f `-k,^;`r' 'Op; xC;a4, i,`, ' ;; .. ";�,:;.,... '" "': {. rirvd ,4.'4.,'� t_ w' � �� ,.• I %» '"�,y, �w,`";•,'`,�? '.°4`:;^'""' �Y as ;:�ti t.-�.> �cq , '.�-, x r ,-dra i ,�:+ ' <„rr "iati ,. ,::...°n4��- ",,.r,„r,,a: �a,.+" tiVtv:+�"4.a`v. " EE ,w.xm"�„h,.,►�,,d;r',,:,{,x'� ,i�i,^, ,fy^ '�r , �,,',:au;.A�7%.z.,,"'•3.z',`r,4�^?"t;.,",,:l.r,.a,>r,.'.,+;,,,; k,,. , r- ♦ ," #` Y A ^,.� ' x?,.v ±t ' ,' nr;*t" ; , s' x t� . Hw: 42k'*i;. ;sy, U,�,n^, §�''` " 7,' ,' ..". x ` k � „ . ,i,tn . �b'J :° zx"� i;▪n� �▪ �" „s.A1 .1 ' ,. . „ � ;v+ k' {>.�P /e "^'^::c.my°f ' , 'k v yr .,a�4 y ', "'J rrj,y- > 'S7 #'nn .,O,,,,. , . , 'f,' , P; `, a` e' . „ „i j tkAt _ a =,mA` y. ra rye , a:,a. „y , s t.: :x j' 'may ^°'" ;:",':•,'N.,°'utMk,Prgweha:,",kr,`,,' l 1 — ";ti' ;,may a .t 0.,,. C' ,,'R`k^M T^*dyk.�0.i1 N�4+a'yr'r µY„"'(j d4tv'„Nwx. 1 , , PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA CEREAL FOOD PROCESSORS INC CLARK, GEORGE PO BOX 2798 3336 E 32ND ST 1717 N 1500 W Suite Suite 217 Suite iliFLETON, CO 80161- TULSA, OK 74135-4442 FARMINGTON, UT 84025-3072 A&Z PRODUCE COMPANY - BARKLEY ENTERPRISES LTD BARKLEY ENTERPRISES, LTD 366 W 500 S 5600 S HOLLADAY BLVD 5600 S HOLLADAY BLVD Suite Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101-1709 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84121-1508 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84121-1508 DESERET NEWS PUBLISHING CO & KEARN KEARNS-TRIBUNE CORPORATION; ET AL A&Z PRODUCE CO 143 S MAIN ST 143 S MAIN ST PO BOX 1782 Suite Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1924 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 1 1-1 924 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84110-1782 A&Z PRODUCE CO INC A&Z PRODUCE II, LC CLARK, JAY DEE&STEVEN D&SCOTT D PO BOX 1782 PO BOX 1782 PO BOX 1782 Suite Suite Suite SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84110-1782 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84110-1782 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84110-1782 LEWIS BROS STAGES INC TAWA, MITZI M SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 510247 PO BOX 510688 451 S STATE ST Suite Suite Suite 245 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84151-0247 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84151-0688 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 1 1-31 02 IIITE ROAD COMMISSION OF UTAH 4501 S 2700 W Suite TAYLORSVILLE, UT 84119-5928 PRE-HEARING NOTICE AND RESPONSE LETTER(S) STEPHEN A. GOLDSMITH SALT r I EN €.ORP I RA�'I.O: i ®�� -�- �-^�+ ROSS C. ANDERSON PLANNING DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAYOR PLANNING DIVISION BRENT B. WILDE DEPUTY PLANNING DIRECTOR Thursday, March 21, 2002 Re: 500 South Honorary Street Name Petition # 400-01-46 Dear Property Owner/Community Council Chair: The Salt Lake City Planning Division is currently reviewing a request from The Committee to Honor Cesar E. Chavez,requesting an honorary street name designation of 500 South, beginning at 700 East and ending at 500 West to Cesar Chavez Boulevard. Certified street address will not be affected by an honorary street name. The honorary street name will be added to the 500 South street signs at the committee's expense, similar to the honorary street sign of 400 South designated as Poplar Grove Boulevard and 600 South as Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. Please read the attached letter from the committee to Ross C. "Rocky"Anderson for the City to consider this request_ The City Council will ultimately hold a public hearing prior to deciding on the honorary street name designation, to receive citizen and community council input. We will notify you of the public hearing date. Property owners please contact our office or your local community council if you have any concerns or questions as soon as possible. Community Council Chairs please discuss this item at your next community council meeting. The intent of this letter is to help determine if any of the property owners abutting 500 South have concerns about the City considering this honorary street name, and to determine the level of community support. Please provide us with any comments that result from your discussion_ Thank you for your help in this matter. If you have any comments or questions concerning this petition, please call me at 535-6354. Sincerely, )(9— I Jackie O. Gasparik Principal Planner 451 South State Street#406 Salt Lake City 84111 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 406,SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE:801-53S-7757 FAX:801-535-61 74 0 August 9,2001 g Salt Lake Committee to honor Cesar E. Chavez P.O. Box 389 V Salt Lake City, Utah 8410 fits • Ross C. "Rocky"Anderson, Mayor Salt Lake City,Utah 451 South State Street Salt Lake City,UT 8411 Mayor Anderson: During the past several months, a group of citizens has convened formally and informally to discuss how Salt Lake City could honor one of the most noted American leaders of Hispanic descent, Cesar Estrada Chavez. Many Utah residents, particularly those of Hispanic origin,have been beneficiaries of Chavez'far-reaching influence. For this we propose honoring his legacy. Cesar E. Chavez,cofounder of the United Farm Workers of America-AFL-CIO,galvanized an exploited people. He raised the conscience of a nation through non-violent action about civil rights violations that resulted in the mis-education of children,marginalized access to health care for families and disenfranchised communities.His efforts on behalf of farm workers inspired creativity,self-identity,pride,resolve to overcome seemingly impossible barriers to success and an improved quality of life. Chavez'struggle became synonymous with the plight of Hispanic Americans. Though his work is noteworthy in other human rights endeavors,Chavez is known as a great humanitarian whose humble deeds transformed many lives and made us want to be better. He received the Aguila Azteca(The Aztec Eagle),Mexico's highest award presented to people of Mexican heritage who have made major contributions outside of Mexico.Chavez became the second Mexican American to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom,the highest civilian honor in the United States. The award was presented,posthumously,by President Bill Clinton. Several community-based organizations and individuals support a proposed plan to place an honorary name designate on a major street in Salt Lake City. Specifically,5th South,beginning at 7th East and ending at 3rd West.This street has received the widest support as the most desirable target site. The committee believes the following rationale warrants attention(5th South-Cesar Chavez Boulevard): • Many cities and towns have recognized Cesar E. Chavez' positive impact on society and his role as a leader for the Hispanic community.Throughout the nation it is common for streets,parks,schools and public places to be named in Cesar E. Chavez'honor. • 5th South would lend recognition to the changed demographics of Salt Lake City,and the renewed focus by Mexico's President Fox and our President Bush,upon the issues of business and immigration between the two countries. • 5th South,east to west designate flows parallel to the well-established 600 South-Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. • 5th South is identified as a major thoroughfare exiting the city and has high use and high visibility. • 5th South has a significant number of merchant and other public entities that are responsive to local Hispanic business and exchange. • 5th South honorary name designate would become a recognized symbol of Salt Lake City's diversity/ethnic pride. The Salt Lake Committee to Honor Cesar E.Chavez respectfully requests your consideration and support of our effort for an honor eet designation.The committee is at your disposal should you have any questions regarding Cesar E. Chavez or ou ffort. lie committee is resolved for success and will promote community ownership through education and Ilaboration bpi di during upcoming months. hank y for yo time and consideration of this project. We eagerly await your response. aul Ramos So enas Director,CHC Utah Farm Worker Health Professor,U of U Dept of Education, Culture and Society and Ethnic Studies Program 1:Lee_14,Richard Silva {fns-t - Chairman,Salt Lake County Hispanic Association Frank Cordova Chairman of RAZ-PAC Aileen Hughe President of Eligio White University of Ut Chairman,Utah Coalition of La Raza • atie c Leticia Medina Mark Alvarez,Esq. Director,Governor's Office Hispanic Affairs Valdez,Simms&Alvarez L 3?)5-viTaal 10) • Forrest Crawford,Ed. Octavio Villalpando Consultant to Martin Luther King Jr.Commission Professor, U Of U Education Leadership Policy Professor,Dept of Education WSU PUBLIC NOTICE $ 1 r..%=S 4t.1'S 1 t)+ .cS i1��1tiFFIFrtF}i1FE11llIi311�f�Ff iF1t l4F11!{t11E1 i 1-1 Salt Lake City Planning Division t l,.,;-.%',, _ }y 451 South State Street I i Salt Lake City,Utah 84111 `' ;li=::r," to LfFr I/FP March 29, 2002 /ckie O. Gasparik Principal Planner Salt Lake City Corporation 451 South State Street#406 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Dear Jackie, We are pleased to join the community and give a positive recommendation to renaming the street honoring Cesar E. Chavez. There are many people of Latino extraction in our great city and state. We believe that the positive response to renaming the Martin Luther King, Jr. street will be the same for this action. Sincerely, J2r .'mil//!�-► /ef4L4 Nick S. Vidalakis, Ph.D. The Family Center® at East Downtown CEO and COB CC: Steve Koch, Property Manager, Transwestern Property Co. Saul Ramos, Director, CHC Utah Farm Worker Health Richard Silva, Chairman, Salt Lake County Hispanic Association Aileen Hughes, President of M.E.Ch.A., University of Utah Leticia Medina, Director, Governor's Office Hispanic Affairs Forrest Crawford, Ed.D., Consultant to Martin Luther King, Jr. Commission Professor, Department of Education, WSU Sofia Villenas, Professor, U of U Dept. of Education, Culture and Society and Ethnic Studies Program Frank Cordova, Chairman of RAZ-PAC Eligio White, Chairman, Utah Coalition of La Raza Mark Alvarez, Esq., Valdez, Simms & Alvarez LC Octavio Villalpando, Professor, U of U Education Leadership Policy 101 Stewart Street,Suite 1111 • Seattle,WA 98101 Tel(206) 956-4600 • Fax(206)956-4603 DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS SALT' r�'= a l'GlT- t o _RPO e PION: ALISON GREGERSEN WEYHER - - _- -� � � - ROSS C. "ROCKY" ANDERSON DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAYOR 1 I' (a r Eu September 13,2001 :; CEP I n 200! `! Jackie Gasparik Planning Division 451 South State Street,Room 406 z Salt Lake City,Utah 84111 Re: Petition#400-01-46- Honorary Street Name Request for 50 South from 700 East to 300 West as Cesar Chavez Boulevard. Dear Jackie: The Division of Transportation's site review comments and recommendations are for approval of the proposed honorary street name change subject to the following: 1. As per section "VII Additional Cost"the petitioner is responsible for reimbursing the city for cost and replacement of missing or damaged street signs. 2. The cost to the transportation division and the streets sign shop for signing can be determined and submitted for evaluation upon request. 3. All other signing needs to be reviewed and approved and installed by U.D.O.T. for state roadways. (State Street to 300 West.) 4. Gaps or future failure in the continuity will result in the removal of the remaining signs. 5. Final approval is subject to approvals by all entities for a continuous roadway designation from 700 East to 300 West and conditions as set forth by the City Counsel. Sincerely, Barry D. Wa Transportation Engineer Assoc. Cc: Kevin Young,P.E. Scott Weiler,Engineering File. 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH B41 1 1 TELEPHONE: B01-535-6230 FAX: 801-535-6005 is t.t RECYCLED PAPER Gasparik, Jackie From: Gasparik, Jackie Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:45 PM To: Valente, Art Subject: Signs Art, Petition#400-01-06 Could you please respond back to me when you get then chance to evaluate the cost of putting up new signs along 500 South from 500 West to 700 East,for an honorary street name designation of Cesar Chavez Boulevard. Thank you, Jackie Gasparik, Jackie From: Montoya, Alice Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:13 PM To: Gasparik, Jackie Subject: Petition#400-01-46 Honorary Street Name Request for Cesar Chavez Boulevard My only comment is;why are we starting at 300 West instead of 500 West where the freeway on ramp starts? It would make more sense to include this 2 block segment. Gasparik, Jackie From: Garcia, Peggy Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:31 PM — To: Gasparik, Jackie Subject: 5th South Petition#400-01-46 Jackie, We do not have any conflicts with our utilities this is a name change only. Thanks, Peggy To: Jackie Gasparik From: Alicia Orgill Salt Lake City Police Date: 9-12-01 Subject: Petition # 400-01-46 5th South (7th East to 31-d West) Honorary Street Name Change to Cesar Chavez Boulevard The importance to the Hispanic Community of Utah to recognize the Contribution Cesar Chavez made to aid The Faiiii Workers, in obtaining their civil rights by Mr. Chavez doing this he helped people who are many time unable to defend their civil rights for themselves, Cesar Chavez was able to accomplish this goals through non-violent action. It is important to honor leaders who represent these methods of change. The Hispanic Community is the fastest growing population in our city it is important to honor Hispanic Leaders like Cesar Chavez which gives the Hispanic Community a sense of ownership of the city. Wheelwright, Doug From: Larson, Bradley Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:55 AM To: Wheelwright, Doug Subject: FW: Cesar Chavez Blvd Original Message From: Larson, Bradley Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 09:19 To: Gasparik, Jackie Subject: RE: Cesar Chavez Blvd Jackie, The Fire Department would also recommend approval. Thank you, Brad Larson Deputy Fire Marshal Original Message From: Gasparik,Jackie Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:01 _To: Larson, Bradley Cc: Wheelwright, Doug Subject: Cesar Chavez Blvd Importance: High Brad, Please respond back to Doug, on whether or not you have any concerns about the City approving an Honorary street name change of 500 South (between 300 West and 700 East). All other departments have recommended approval. Thanks Jackie :) ORIGINAL PETITION PACKET PETITION NO. m -®/- w, PETITION CHECKLIST Date Initials Action Required / Petition delivered to Planning Petition assigned to: �� f A- Planning Staff or Planning Commission Action Date Return Original Letter and Yellow Petition Cover ;-t�►1 Chronology Property Description (marked with a post it note) A-;` Affected Sidwell Numbers Included 7 Mailing List for Petition, include appropriate Community Councils lam?7 Mailing Postmark Date Verification Planning Commission Minutes ' !ll Planning Staff Report -5 A / Cover letter outlining what the request is and a brief description of what action the Planning Commission or Staff is recommending. \ Ordinance Prepared by the Attorney's Office A FA- Ordinance property description is checked, dated and initialed by the Planner. Ordinance is stamped by Attorney. e Planner responsible for taking calls on the Petition Date Set for City Council Action Petition filed with City Recorder's Office -. 7. August 9,2001 Salt Lake Committee to honor Cesar E.Chavez t^ _, ' P.O.Box 389 Salt Lake City,Utah 8410 "`< it •i t s'Ey Ross C. "Rocky"Anderson,Mayor ` "` Salt Lake City,Utah 451 South State Street Salt Lake City,UT 84111 Mayor Anderson: During the past several months,a group of citizens has convened formally and informally to discuss how Salt Lake City could honor one of the most noted American leaders of Hispanic descent,Cesar Estrada Chavez.Many Utah residents, particularly those of Hispanic origin,have been beneficiaries of Chavez'far-reaching influence. For this we propose honoring his legacy. Cesar E. Chavez,cofounder of the United Farm Workers of America-AFL-CIO,galvanized an exploited people. He raised the conscience of a nation through non-violent action about civil rights violations that resulted in the mis-education of children,marginalized access to health care for families and disenfranchised communities.His efforts on behalf of farm workers inspired creativity,self-identity,pride,resolve to overcome seemingly impossible barriers to success and an improved quality of life.Chavez'struggle became synonymous with the plight of Hispanic Americans. Though his work is noteworthy in other human rights endeavors,Chavez is known as a great humanitarian whose humble deeds transformed many lives and made us want to be better. He received the Aguila Azteca(The Aztec Eagle),Mexico's highest award presented to people of Mexican heritage who have made major contributions outside of Mexico.Chavez became the second Mexican American to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom,the highest civilian honor in the United States. The award was presented,posthumously,by President Bill Clinton. Several community-based organizations and individuals support a proposed plan to place an honorary name designate on a major street in Salt Lake City. Specifically,5th South,beginning at 7th East and ending at 3rd West.This street has received the widest support as the most desirable target site. The committee believes the following rationale warrants attention (5th South-Cesar Chavez Boulevard): • Many cities and towns have recognized Cesar E. Chavez' positive impact on society and his role as a leader for the Hispanic community.Throughout the nation it is common for streets,parks,schools and public places to be named in Cesar E. Chavez'honor. • 5th South would lend recognition to the changed demographics of Salt Lake City,and the renewed focus by Mexico's President Fox and our President Bush,upon the issues of business and immigration between the two countries. • 5th South,east to west designate flows parallel to the well-established 600 South-Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. • 5th South is identified as a major thoroughfare exiting the city and has high use and high visibility_ • 5th South has a significant number of merchant and other public entities that are responsive to local Hispanic business and exchange. • 5th South honorary name designate would become a recognized symbol of Salt Lake City's diversity/ethnic pride. The Salt Lake Committee to Honor Cesar E.Chavez respectfully requests your consideration and support of our effort for an hono eet designation.The committee is at your disposal should you have any questions regarding Cesar E.Chavez or ou ffort. e committee is resolved for success and will promote community ownership through education and llaboration bpi di during upcoming months. i ank y for yo time and consideration of this project. We eagerly await your response. aul Ramos Sofi enas Director,CNC Utah Farm Worker Health Professor,U of U Dept of Education,Culture and Society and Ethnic Studies Program It g N,fts.a Richard Silva ? st- Chairman,Salt Lake County Hispanic Association Frank Cordova Chairman of RAZ-PAC Aileen Hughe President of . . Eligio White University of Ut Chairman,Utah Coalition of La Raza • Leticia Medina Mark Alvarez,Esq. Director,Governor's Office Hispanic Affairs Valdez,Simms&Alvarez L go) Forrest Crawford,Ed. Octavio Villalpando Consultant to Martin Luther King Jr.Commission Professor,U Of U Education Leadership Policy Professor,Dept of Education WSU REMARKS Petition No. 400-01-46 By Mayor Anderson Is requesting an honorary street name designated on 5th South from 700 East to 300 West as Cesar E. Chavez. I ' 1 1 1 Date Filed Address • • MEMORANDUM DATE: July 5,2002 TO: City Council Members FROM: Russell Weeks RE: Briefing: Proposed Ordinances Pertaining to Land Use on the Library Block CC: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Rocky Fluhart,David Nimkin,Margaret Hunt, David Dobbins, Stephen Goldsmith,Nancy Tessman,Janice Jardine This memorandum is a brief description of a proposed ordinance that would amend Chapter 21A.32 of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. The proposed amendment would allow public libraries to have a maximum building height of 75-feet unless an adjacent zoning district allows a greater height. The proposed amendment also would allow"accessory retail sales and services"when they are located within a"principal building"in areas zoned as public lands and amphitheaters,movie theaters and live performance theaters as conditional uses in areas zoned as public lands. Issues, Questions for Consideration • What adverse effects might occur on areas zoned as public lands if the proposed amendments were adopted? • The amendments were proposed within the context of uses in the new main library that is under construction,yet the proposed amendments would apply to all areas zoned as public lands. Is there a way to limit the effects of the proposed amendments only to land on the Library Block? • Are there any City parks zoned as public lands? • There currently are two alternative plans for open space east of the new main library. What might happen if an amphitheater no longer becomes an element of the open space east of the new main library? Discussion/Background Last March the City Council considered a tentative timeline to consider the proposed amendments relating to retail uses on property zoned as public lands in September or October. The timeline scheduled the issue after City Council consideration of the Central City Master Plan, tentatively scheduled for August or September.During discussion of the Salt Lake Library System budget Library System administrators requested that Council consideration of the proposed land use amendments be moved up because the Library System planned to issue 1 requests for proposals on the use of about 10,000 square feet of space for retail and community purposes. There are about 10 areas within the new library that will be available for retail or community use. The City Council then scheduled the current briefing. A May 20 letter to parties interested in locating in the new main library indicated that the deadline for submitting applications to locate in the new library was July 26 at 5 p.m. The proposed ordinance appears to involve three major issues. The first involves including public libraries as uses on public lands that allow building heights to reach 75 feet.However,because the western portion of the new library is about 90 feet high the proposed ordinance would add public libraries to a list of land uses that would allow the use of the building height regulations of an adjacent zoning district. The second issue involves expanding the use of accessory retail sales from sales and services that are for the primary benefit of employees of a principal land use to sales and services that are for the benefit of library patrons and the general public. The third issue involves the inclusion of amphitheaters, movie theaters and live performance theaters as conditional uses on property zoned as public lands. It should be noted that Pioneer Park is zoned as open space,not as public lands. One issue the City Council may wish to consider involves the applicability of the proposed amendments to all lands zoned as public lands. Based on a map included in the Administration's transmittal,there appear to be about 60 areas within the City zoned as public lands. Given that the proposed amendments appear to be tailored to the Library Block, would the proposed amendments have an effect on the other areas? 2 AT ® GA i A7 it lJ -, 1j , STEPHEN A. GOLDSMITH S+'�1'5 1A, ,'GZTY CARP 6�I� tIO 'em �� -�_ �. ��'• �-; �! ROSS C. ANDERSON PLANNING DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAYOR PLANNING DIVISION BRENT B. WILDE DEPUTY PLANNING DIRECTOR DOUGLAS L. WHEELWRIGHT DEPUTY PLANNING DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL (4k) TO: Rocky Fluhart, Director, Management Services Date: 3 FROM: Margaret Hunt, Director, Community & Economic Developme RE: Transmittal of the Petition 400-00-61 by the Salt Lake City Public Library requesting to amend the text of the PL Public Lands District STAFF CONTACTS: Joel Paterson, Senior Planner(535-6141) e-mail: joel.paterson@ci.slc.ut.us RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council schedule a briefing and a public hearing to consider adopting an ordinance to amend the text of the PL Public Lands District DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance BUDGET IMPACT: None DISCUSSION: The Salt Lake Public Library submitted Petition 400-00-61 requesting to amend the text of the PL Public Lands zoning district by allowing accessory retail uses to accommodate the proposed development plans for the new main library. The Library also submitted Petition 410-509 requesting the Planning Commission to grant planned development approval for the new library to allow a modification of the 30-foot minimum setback requirement for the underground parking and to allow a grade change of more than two feet along 400 South and 200 East. On December 14, 2000, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt an ordinance to amend Sections 21A.32.070 D (1) and 21A.32.140 of the Public Lands zoning district and granted approval of Petition 410-509. The proposed text amendments are discussed below. ISSUE ORIGIN: On November 2, 2000, the Salt Lake City Public Library submitted a petition to amend the text of the PL Public Lands zoning district. The design program for the new library includes the leasing of small spaces for accessory retail sales and services for the benefit of the patrons of the library and the general public. As currently written, the PL district only allows accessory retail uses that are for the primary benefit of the employees of the principal land use. An example of such a use is the Washington Square Cafe located in the City and County Building. 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH B41 1 1 TELEPHONE: 801-53355-7757 FAX: B01-535-6174 17q nccvcco Pnocw After review of the proposed Library Block Plan and the current Public Lands zoning text, the Planning Division expanded the petition by proposing that philanthropic uses (defined as offices or meeting halls used by nonprofit public service organizations), movie theaters/live performance theaters and amphitheaters be added to the Public Lands Table of Peiuiitted and Conditional Uses (Zoning Ordinance Section 21A.32.140). These uses are being added to accommodate the potential reuse of the existing library for nonprofit organizations and the future development of an amphitheater and an indoor theater on the eastern portion of the Library Block. As proposed in the Library Block Plan, the eastern portion of the block will be developed as open space that will include an outdoor amphitheater and an indoor theater that will be run in conjunction with the library. These facilities are not a part of this phase of development but the issue should be addressed at this time. These are uses that may have an impact on surrounding neighborhoods and are therefore, proposed as conditional uses. The PL District allows certain land uses to utilize the building height regulation of an adjacent zoning district if the adjacent district allows more height. The D-1 zoning adjacent to the Library Block allows corner buildings to be constructed up to 375 feet in height as a permitted use. Because of this, the proposed 90-foot building height for the new library is allowed as a permitted use and does not require pubic notification, a public hearing or approval by the Planning Commission. Staff believes that this building height provision could potentially have a significant impact on properties adjacent to an area shown on the zoning map as PL. For this reason, Staff included the issue of additional building height in the planned development petition to allow for public input. Furthermore, the text amendment petition submitted by the Library was modified to include language that would require conditional use approval by the Planning Commission to modify the maximum building height allowed by Section 21A.32.070 D (1) of the PL District. To codify an administrative interpretation that public libraries are considered "local public facilities," Staff also proposed amending Section 21A.32.070 D (1) of the PL District by adding"public libraries"to the list of land uses able to utilize the building height regulation of an adjacent zoning district. PUBLIC PROCESS: The Salt Lake City Public Library staff has carried out an extensive public outreach process to inform the public about the new library. The text amendment will affect all PL districts in the City and would typically be discussed at the Mayor's monthly coordination meeting with community council chairs. A request was sent to the Mayor's Community Affairs Office to notify community council chairs of the proposed text amendment and to schedule a briefing if desired. No briefing was requested. However, the outreach program by the Library staff was thorough and included a model of the proposed library and the idea of including accessory retail operations within the library. The Library Staff and the architectural team have held two well-attended open houses at the main branch of the library. The open houses were held on April 27, and May 31, 2000. Through the community outreach program, presentations were made to Transmittal for Petition 400-00-61 -2- Public Lands District Text Amendments 17 different community groups. These are listed in the Chronology attached to this transmittal: During the Planning Commission public hearing held on December 14, 2000, no public comment was offered. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council to adopt an ordinance to amend the text of the PL Public Lands District. MASTER PLAN CONSIDERATIONS: • The East Downtown Neighborhood Plan envisions the future land use of the Library Block to be institutional. The Library Block is located in Sub Area 7 that the Plan designates as a mixed-use retail and commercial area. The Plan recommends a mixed-use zoning approach for the neighborhood with a "mixed- use office" designation for the Library Block. The East Downtown Neighborhood Plan recommends establishing view corridors to protect scenic vistas such as the City/County Building, Cathedral of the Madeleine and the State Capitol. Building heights should support the urban design elements of Salt Lake and views of the surrounding mountains. • The Urban Design Plan places the Library Block in the Downtown Fringe area and recommends building heights of six to twelve stories. • The proposed Library Block Master Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission envisions the development of the proposed library, the potential reuse of the existing library building by a philanthropic use, and the future development of open space on the eastern portion of the block that may include an amphitheater and an indoor theater. The proposed ordinance text amendments to the Public Lands District are consistent with these plans. RELEVANT ORDINANCES: Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance section 21A.50.050, Standards for General Amendments. Transmittal for Petition 400-00-61 -3 - Public Lands District Text Amendments TABLE OF CONTENTS CHRONOLOGY PROPOSED ORDINANCE CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE MAILING LABELS PLANNING COMMISSION Hearing Notice and Postmark Staff Report Agendas/Minutes ORIGINAL PETITION CHRONOLOGY CHRONOLOGY Petition 400-00-61 by the Salt Lake City Public Library To Amend the Text of the Public Lands District April 27, 2000 Public Open House held in the auditorium of the Main Branch of the Salt Lake City Public Library May 3, 2000 Presentation made to the Central Community Council May 3, 2000 Presentation made to the Avenues Community Council May 31, 2000 Public Open House held in the auditorium of the Main Branch of the Salt Lake City Public Library July 20, 2000 Meeting with the Library Board of Directors August 17, 2000 Meeting with the Library Board of Directors August 17, 2000 Planning Commission held a public hearing and forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council August 19, 2000 Fainier's Market August 24, 2000 State Fairpark Community Council August 25, 2000 The Hispanic Festival August 26, 2000 Chapman Library Street Fair September 6, 2000 Sugar House Community Council September 9, 2000 9th and 9th Street Fair September 13, 2000 Liberty Wells Community Council September 13, 2000 East Central Community Council September 16, 2000 Avenues Street Fair September 20, 2000 Rio Grande Community Council September 20, 2000 Indian Hills Community Council September 23, 2000 Great Salt Lake Book Festival September 26, 2000 Yalecrest Community Council September 27, 2000 Poplar Grove Community Council October 4, 2000 Rose Park Community Council November 2, 2000 The Salt Lake City Public Library submitted applications for planned development approval and for a zoning text amendment November 29, 2000 Notices for the Planning Commission public hearing mailed November 30, 2000 Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing ran in the Deseret News and the Salt Lake Tribune December 1, 2000 Second notice mailed. Notice included corrected typographic error found in the November 29"'notice December 14, 2000 Planning Commission public hearing. The Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council to adopt an ordinance to amend the text of the PL District. December 19, 2000 A request was sent to the City Attorney's Office to prepare an ordinance to amend the text of the PL District PROPOSED ORDINANCE SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2001 (Amending Chapter 21A.32 of the Salt Lake City Code Regarding the Public Lands District) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21A.32 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE REGARDING THE PUBLIC LANDS DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-00-61. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Zoning Code contains a classification known as the Public Lands (PL) Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, finds after public hearings before its own body and before the Planning Commission that portions of the Salt Lake City Zoning Code which relate to the Public Lands Zoning District should be amended to more accurately reflect the property uses permitted in that zoning district, and that such amendments are in the best interest of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Section 21A.32.070 D.1 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: D. Maximum Building Height: 1. Local Government Facilities, Public Libraries, Prisons Or Jails, Government Offices,Arenas, Stadiums, Fairgrounds And Exhibition Halls: Seventy five feet (75'); provided, that where adjacent to a zoning district allowing greater height, the height standard of the adjacent district shall apply. a. A modification to the maximum building height provisions of this Section may be granted as a conditional use subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Part V, Chapter 21A.54 of this title. 2. Other Uses: Thirty five feet (35'). SECTION 2. The table located at Section 21 A.32.140 of the Salt Lake City Code entitled "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts," shall be and — hereby is amended to read as set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of 2001. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR !Y ?Y of 9k 0401 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2001. Published: 3 Exhibit "A" 21A.32.140 Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Special Purpose Districts: LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH El MU -2 -5 -20 Residential Assisted living p facility(see Section 21A.36.050 of this Title) Congregate care p P p facility Dwelling units, p above first floor commercial or office Group home,large C (see Section 21 A.36.070 of this Title) Group home,small P P P p (see Section 21A.36.070 of this Title) Living quarters for P P P P P p caretakers and security guards Manufactured home P P P p Mobile homes p Multi-family(no p maximum density limitation) Multiple-family p dwellings Nursing care facility P P p Resident health care p facility(see Section 21A.36.040 of this Title) Single-family p attached dwellings Single-family P PPP p detached dwellings Twin home and two- p family dwellings Rooming(boarding) p house • 21A.32.140 Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Special Purpose Districts: LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MA EI MU -2 -5 -20 Residential Assisted living p facility(see Section 21A.36.050 of this Title) Congregate care P P p facility Dwelling units, p above first floor commercial or office _ Group home, large C (see Section 21A.36.070 of this Title) Group home,small P P P p (see Section 21A.36.070 of this Title) Living quarters for P P P P P p caretakers and security guards Manufactured home P P P p Mobile homes p Multi-family(no p maximum density limitation) Multiple-family p dwellings Nursing care facility P P p Resident health care p facility(see Section 21A.36.040 of this Title) Single-family p attached dwellings Single-family PPP P p detached dwellings Twin home and two- p family dwellings Rooming(boarding) p house LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH EI MU -2 -5 -20 Office And Related Uses Accessory offices p supporting an institutional use Financial P P P3 institutions,with drive-through facilities Financial P P P institutions,without drive-through facilities Government offices P P P P P P P Medical and dental P P P P P offices Offices P P P Offices,research P P P related Veterinary offices, P P operating entirely within an enclosed building and keeping animals overnight only for treatment purposes Retail Sales And Services Accessory retail P P P P P P P sales and services uses,when located within the principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees _ Accessory retail P sales and services uses when located within a principal building Commercial service C establishments LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=conditional BY DISTRICT' SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS Use P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AC AG AC OS A PL I UI MD El MU -2 -5 -20 Gas station(may include accessory convenience retail and/or minor repairs as defined in Part VI,Chapter 2IA.62 of this Title) Restaurants with -.-`>----- P' drive-through facilities Restaurants without C' drive-through facilities Retail goods C P establishments Retail service P establishments Institutional Uses Adult daycare P P P centers Child daycare P P P P P P P centers Cemeteries and P accessory crematoriums _ Colleges and P P universities Community and P P P P -- P— recreation centers Conference center P P C P Convention center, C with or without hotels — ----- _.---. Convents and —.-_-~- P P monasteries Dental laboratories/ P P C P research facilities Emergency response C P P and medical service facilities including fire stations and Hymn: carters ' Exhibition hall C C P LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH El MU -2 -5 -20 Hospitals,including C p P accessory lodging facilities Libraries P P P Medical and dental P P P P p clinics Medical research P p p facilities Medical/nursing p schools Meeting halls of P P P p membership organizations Nursing care p P facility;sanitariums Pet cemetery p4 p4 p4 p4 p4,5 Philanthropic uses p P P Places of worship P P p Prison or jail C Religious assembly C p with exhibit hall Research, P P p C commercial, scientific, educational Reuse of schools C C C P and churches Seminaries and P P P religious institutes Schools,K-12 P P private Schools,K-12 p public Schools, C P p P P professional/ vocational Recreation, Cultural And Entertainment Art galleries p Arenas,stadiums, C C C fairgrounds Botanical gardens C LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH EI MU -2 -5 -20 Community gardens p as defined in Part VI, Chapter 21A.62 of this Title Country clubs p Dance studio p Golf courses p p p Movie theaters/live C P performance theaters Amphitheaters C If Museums C P P P j Natural open space P P p p p and conservation areas Nature preserves/ P P p p p p p conservation areas, public and private Park(public) C p P p Pedestrian P p pathways,trails and greenways Private recreational P p P P p facilities Tavern/ C lounge/brew pub; 2,500 square feet or less in floor area Zoological park p Airport And Related Uses Air cargo terminals P p and package delivery facilities Airline service and p maintenance i operations Airline ticketing and p baggage processing Airport operations p (including air traffic control,navigational aids,emergency and maintenance operations LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH EI MU -2 -5 -20 Alcoholic beverage p consumption establishments(on- premises)(within terminal complex only) Automobile rental P p agencies Commercial p recreation center (within terminal complex only) Financial p institutions(within terminal complex only) Fuel storage for on- p site distribution General aviation p facilities Heliport C C P C C Light manufacturing C P Meeting rooms p (within terminal complex only) Offices p Restaurants;other p food services Retail goods p establishments- specialty,primarily for airport customers(within terminal complex only) Retail services p establishments- primarily for airport customers(within terminal complex only) LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI Mill EI MU -2 -5 -20 Miscellaneous Accessory uses, PPP P P P P P PP P P P P P except those that are otherwise specifically regulated in this Chapter,or elsewhere in this Title Agricultural uses C P P PP P Bed and breakfast C2 p p Bed and breakfast C2 p inn Bed and breakfast p p manor Communication P P C PPPP p towers Communication C C P C C C C towers, exceeding the maximum building height Concrete or asphalt p manufacturing Hotels and motels C C p p Industrial assembly P p Jewelry fabrication P and associated processing Kennels,public or C P8 P8 P8 P8 private, on lots of 5 acres or larger8 Local government P P P PP P P p facilities Mining and p extraction of minerals and materials,including ore,stone,sand, gravel, oil and oil shale Off-site parking P CCC C Outdoor storage, P p p accessory Park and ride lots P C LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH EI MU -2 -5 -20 Park and ride P P P PPP P P parking, shared with existing use Parking structure P P P _ P P CC P P Production related to P C on-site research • Public/private utility CCC C C C C C P CCCC C C buildings and structures ' Public/private utility P P P P P PP P P PPP P P P transmission wires, lines,pipes and poles 1 Radio station P6 Stable,private PP PP Stable,public C C Storage of extracted P material Transportation P C terminals,including bus,rail and trucking Trucking,repair, P storage,etc., associated with extractive industries Warehouse, C accessory to retail and wholesale business(5,000 square foot or greater floor plate) Warehouse, P accessory to retail and wholesale business(maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Warehouse, P P including mini- storage warehouses Wholesale P P C distribution Qualifying Provisions: 1. See subsection 21A.02.050B of this Title for utility regulations. 2. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources. 3. When located on an arterial street. 4. Subject to Salt Lake City/County Health Depait,nent approval. 5. In conjunction with, and within the boundaries of, a cemetery for human remains. 6. Radio station equipment and antennas shall be required to go through the site plan review process to ensure that the color, design and location of all proposed equipment and antennas are screened or integrated into the architecture of the project and are compatible with surrounding uses. 7. When approved as part of a business park planned development pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.54.150 of this Title. 8. Kennels,public or private,whether within penned enclosures or within enclosed buildings, shall not be permitted within 200 feet of an existing single-family dwelling on an adjacent lot. (Ord. 14-00 §4,2000: Ord. 9-00 § 3,2000: Ord. 35-99 § 41, 1999: Ord. 12-98 §4, 1998: amended during 5/96 supplement: Ord. 85-95 § I (Exh.A), 1995: Ord. 84-95 § 1 (Exh.A), 1995: Ord.26-95 §2(16-12), 1995) SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2001 (Amending Chapter 21A.32 of the Salt Lake City Code Regarding the Public Lands District) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21 A.32 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE REGARDING THE PUBLIC LANDS DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-00-61. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Zoning Code contains a classification known as the Public Lands (PL) Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, finds after public hearings before its own body and before the Planning Commission that portions of the Salt Lake City Zoning Code which relate to the Public Lands Zoning District should be amended to more accurately reflect the property uses permitted in that zoning district, and that such amendments are in the best interest of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Section 21A.32.070 D.1 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: D. Maximum Building Height: 1. Local Government Facilities, Public Libraries, Prisons Or Jails, Government I Offices,Arenas, Stadiums, Fairgrounds And Exhibition Halls: Seventy five feet (75'); provided, that where adjacent to a zoning district allowing greater height,the height standard of the adjacent district shall apply. a. A modification to the maximum building height provisions of this Section may be granted as a conditional use subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Part V, Chapter 21 A.54 of this title. 2. Other Uses: Thirty five feet (35'). SECTION 2. The table located at Section 21A.32.140 of the Salt Lake City Code entitled "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts," shall be and hereby is amended to read as set forth on Exhibit"A" attached hereto. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah,this day of , 2001. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR 2 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2001. Published: G:1OrdinaOl\Public Lands District-Jan 23,2001.doc 3 Exhibit "A" 21A.32.140 Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Special Purpose Districts: — LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH EI MU -2 -5 -20 Residential Assisted living P facility(see Section 21A.36.050 of this Title) Congregate care P P P facility Dwelling units, P above first floor commercial or office Group home, large C (see Section 21A.36.070 of this Title) Group home, small P P P P (see Section 21 A.36.070 of this Title) Living quarters for P P P P P P caretakers and security guards Manufactured home P P P P Mobile homes P Multi-family(no P maximum density limitation) Multiple-family P dwellings Nursing care facility P P P Resident health care P facility(see Section 21A.36.040 of this Title) Single-family P attached dwellings Single-family P PPP P detached dwellings Twin home and two- P family dwellings Rooming(boarding) P house • LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES BY DISTRICT C=Conditional SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS Use P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH EI MU -2 -5 -20 Office And Related Uses Accessory offices p supporting an institutional use P3 Financial P P institutions,with drive-through facilities Financial P P institutions,without drive-through facilities Government offices P P P P P P Medical and dental P P P p P offices Offices P p P Offices,research P P related Veterinary offices, P operating entirely within an enclosed building and keeping animals overnight only for treatment purposes Retail Sales And Services Accessory retail P P P P P P P sales and services uses,when located within the principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees Accessory retail P sales and services uses when located within a principal building Commercial service establishments LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES BY DISTRICT C=Conditional SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS Use P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI Mil EI MU -2 -5 -20 P3 Gas station(may C7 include accessory convenience retail and/or minor repairs as defined in Part VI, Chapter 21A.62 of this Title) p3 Restaurants with C7 drive-through facilities Restaurants without C7 drive-through facilities P Retail goods C7 establishments P Retail service establishments Institutional Uses P Adult daycare p P centers P Child daycare P P P P P P centers Cemeteries and p accessory crematoriums Colleges and p P universities p Community and p P P P recreation centers Conference center P P C P Convention center, C with or without hotels ' Convents and P P monasteries . - _ - P Dental laboratories/ P P C research facilities Emergency response C P P and medical service facilities including fire stations and living quarters Exhibition hall C C P LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES BY DISTRICT C Conditional SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS Use P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI ME EI MU -2 -5 -20 Hospitals, including C p P j accessory lodging facilities Libraries _ p P P Medical and dental P P P P P clinics Medical research P P P facilities _ Medical]nursing p schools Meeting halls of P P P P membership organizations P P Nursing care facility; sanitariums Pet cemetery p4 p4 p4 P4 p4s Philanthropic uses P P P Places of worship p P P Prison or jail C j Religious assembly C p with exhibit hall Research, P P P C commercial, scientific, educational Reuse of schools C C C P and churches Seminaries and p P P religious institutes Schools,K-12 p P private Schools,K-12 p public Schools, C P P P P professional/ vocational Recreation, Cultural And Entertainment Art galleries p Arenas,stadiums, C C C fairgrounds Botanical gardens C LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=ConditionalBY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A Pl. 1 Ul Mll El MU -2 -5 -20 Community gardens P as defined in Part VI,Chapter 21A.62 of this Title Country clubs I Dance studio Golf courses P P P Movie theaters/live C P performance theaters Am Ititheater_s Museums C P P P Natural open space P P 1' P P P and conservation areas Nature preserves/ —_---- P--- 1' P P P..--P P conservation areas, public and private Park IpublicL 1' Pedestrian P P pathways,trails and grecnwayl Private recreational P -----�— P P P P facilities Tavern/ lounge/brew pub; 2,500 square feet or less in floor area Zoological park — P_ Airport And — --- —'—_ '. Related Uses Air cargo tenninals P P and package delivery facilities Airline service and P maintenance o.erations Airline ticketing and P baggage processing Airport operations P (including air traffic control,navigational aids,emergency and maintenance operations) — LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH El MU _ -2 -5 -20 Alcoholic beverage P consumption establishments(on- premises) (within terminal complex only) Automobile rental P P agencies Commercial P j recreation center (within terminal complex only) P Financial j institutions(within terminal complex only) Fuel storage for on- P site distribution General aviation P facilities p C C Heliport C C Light manufacturing C P Meeting rooms P (within terminal complex only) Offices P Restaurants;other P food services Retail goods P establishments- specialty,primarily for airport customers(within terminal complex only) Retail services establishments- primarily for airport customers(within terminal complex only) • LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES BY DISTRICT — C=Conditional SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS Use P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MII El MU -2 -5 -20 Miscellaneous --- Accessory uses, PPP PPP P PP PPP P P P except those that are otherwise specifically regulated in this Chapter,or elsewhere in this Title — — Agncultural uses C P P P P P Bed and breakfast C� P P Bed and breakfast C P P inn Bed and breakfast P P manor Communication P P C P P P P P towers Communication C C ------ P C C C C towers,exceeding the maximum building height---------- — — —----------------- -- ------ Concrete or asphalt P manufacturin Hotels and motels C C P P Industrial assembles_ Jewelry fabrication P and associated processing — —--—---- — ------ — —---- Kennels,public or C P8 Ps P8 P8 private,on hits of 5 acres or larger8 Local government P P P PP PP P facilities Mining and —------ —-------- — ----------- P extraction of minerals and materials,including ore,stone,sand, gravel,oil and oil shale Off-site parking P C CC C Outdoor storage, P P P accessory _ Park and ride lots P C • LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES BY DISTRICT C =Conditional SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS Use P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH EI MU -2 -5 -20 Park and ride P P P P P P P P parking, shared with existing use Parking structure P P P P P C C P P Production related to P C on-site research Public/private utility C C C C C C C C P C C C C C C buildings and structures Public/private utility P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P transmission wires, lines,pipes and poles 1 Radio station P6 Stable,private P P P P Stable,public C C Storage of extracted P material Transportation P C . terminals,including bus,rail and trucking Trucking,repair, P storage, etc., , associated with extractive industries C Warehouse, • - accessory to retail and wholesale business(5,000 square foot or greater floor plate) P Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business(maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Warehouse, P P including mini- storage warehouses - - C Wholesale P P distribution I Qualifying Provisions: 1. See subsection 21A.02.050B of this Title for utility regulations. 2. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources. 3. When located on an arterial street. — 4. Subject to Salt lake City/County Health Department approval. 5. In conjunction with,and within the boundaries of,a cemetery for human remains. 6. Radio station equipment and antennas shall he required to go through the site plan review process to ensure that the color,design and location of all proposed equipment and antennas are screened or integrated into the architecture of the project and arc compatible with surrounding uses. 7. When approved as part of a business park planned development pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.54.150 of this Title. 8. Kennels,public or private,whether within primed enclosures or within enclosed buildings,shall not he permitted within 200 feet of an existing single-family dwelling on an adjacent lot. (Ord.14-00§4,2000:Ord.9-00§3,2000:Ord.35-99§41,1999:Ord.12-98§4,1998:amended during 5/96 supplement: Ord.85-95§1(Exh.A),1995:Ord.84-95§ 1(Exh.A),1995:Ord.26-95§2(16-12),1995) PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TEXT AMENDMENT Petition 400-00-61 December 14, 2000 REQUEST Petition 400-00-61, a request by the Salt Lake City Public Library for a text amendment to the PL Public Lands zoning district to allow additional uses and to modify the building height provisions. COMMUNITY/NEIGHBOROOD COUNCIL(S) REVIEW: The Salt Lake City Public Library staff has carried out an extensive public outreach process to inform the public about the new library. The text amendment will affect all PL districts in the City and would typically be discussed at the Mayor's monthly coordination meeting with community council chairs. A request was sent to the Mayor's Community Affairs Office to notify community council chairs of the proposed text amendment and to schedule a briefing if desired. No briefing was scheduled. However, the outreach program by the Library staff was thorough and included a model of the proposed library and the idea of including accessory retail operations within the library. The Library Staff and the architectural team have held two well-attended open houses at the main branch of the library. The open houses were held on April 27, and May 31, 2000. The following is a summary of the community outreach program: • Central Community Council May 3, 2000 • Avenues Community Council May 3, 2000 • Fannier's Market August 19, 2000 • State Fairpark Community Council August 24, 2000 • The Hispanic Festival August 25, 2000 • Chapman Library Street Fair August 26, 2000 • Sugar House Community Council September 6, 2000 • 9th and 9th Street Fair September 9, 2000 • Liberty Wells Community Council September 13, 2000 • East Central Community Council September 13, 2000 • Avenues Street Fair September 16, 2000 • Rio Grande Community Council September 20, 2000 • Indian Hills Community Council September 20, 2000 Staff Report,Petition 400-00-61 1 December 14,2000 by the Salt Lake City Planning Division • Great Salt Lake Book Festival September 23, 2000 • Yalecrest Community Council September 26, 2000 • Poplar Grove Community Council September 27, 2000 • Rose Park Community Council October 4, 2000 The proposed development plan has been very well received and the public comment received to date has been overwhelmingly positive (see attached minutes of the August 17, 2000 Planning Commission meeting and comments received from the public). GENERAL BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW Applicant: Salt Lake City Public Library Purpose of proposal and proposed amendment: 1. To amend the table of permitted and conditional uses to include accessory retail sales and services, philanthropic uses, theaters and amphitheaters in the PL District; 2. To allow additional building height as a conditional use for local government facilities; and 3. To add "public libraries"to the list of uses allowed to take advantage of additional building height in the PL District. Previous Case Files: Petition 400-00-44 Library Block Plan, reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 17, 2000. Existing Zoning and Overlay Districts: PL Public Lands Existing Master Plan Policies: The proposal is consistent with the Urban Design Element which recommends building heights of six to twelve stories in the fringe area of the downtown core. Affected areas and parcel numbers: All Public Lands Districts. IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF ISSUES The proposed text amendment will address three primary issues (see the attached draft ordinance): • Amend the text of Section 21A.32.070 D (1) Maximum Building Height by adding "public libraries" to the list of specific uses that are allowed to take Staff Report,Petition 400-00-61 2 December 14,2000 by the Salt Lake City Planning Division advantage of a greater building height. The ordinance allows local government facilities, prisons or jails, government offices, arenas, stadiums, fairgrounds and exhibition halls to be built to a maximum height of 75 feet. The proposed text amendment would add "public libraries" to this. It is the opinion of the Salt Lake City Zoning Administrator that a public library could be interpreted as being a local government facility. The proposed text amendment will clarify the interpretation of the Zoning Administrator. • Amend the text of Section 21A.32.070 D (1) Maximum Building Height by adding a conditional use provision to allow additional building height. The PL District allows certain specific uses to be built to a maximum height of 75 feet. If an adjacent zoning district allows a greater building height, then the specific uses listed in this section may be built to the greater height allowed in the adjacent district. This text amendment proposes to include a conditional use process to allow additional building height subject to conformance with applicable master plans. • Amend the Section 21A.32.140 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts to allow accessory retail sales and services intended for use by the general public and philanthropic uses as permitted uses; and movie theaters/live performance theaters and amphitheaters as conditional uses. The design program for the new library includes the leasing of small spaces for accessory retail sales and services for the benefit of the patrons of the library and the general public. The PL district only allows accessory retail uses that are for the primary benefit of the employees of the principal land use. An example of such a use is the Washington Square Café located in the City and County Building. Philanthropic uses allow offices or meeting halls used by nonprofit public service organizations. This use is being added to the PL District to accommodate the potential reuse of the existing library for nonprofit organizations. As proposed in the Library Block Plan, the eastern portion of the block will be developed as open space that will include an outdoor amphitheater and an indoor theater that will be run in conjunction with the library. These facilities are not a part of this phase of development but the issue should be addressed at this time. These are uses that may have an impact on surrounding neighborhoods and are proposed as conditional uses. The proposed text amendment to Section 21A.32.070 D is shown below. The proposed changes are underlined. Section 21A.32.070 D D. Maximum Building Height: 1. Local Government Facilities, Public Libraries, Prisons Or Jails, Government Offices, Arenas, Stadiums, Fairgrounds And Exhibition Halls: Seventy five feet (75'); provided, that where adjacent to a zoning district allowing greater height, the height standard of the adjacent district shall apply. a. A modification to the maximum building height provisions of this Section may be granted as a conditional use subject to conformance with the Staff Report,Petition 400-00-61 3 December 14,2000 by the Salt Lake City Planning Division standards and procedures of Part V, Chapter 21A.54 of this title. 2. Other Uses: Thirty five feet (35'). Section 21A.32.140 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts Use PL District Accessory retail and services uses when Permitted located within a principal building Movie theaters/live performance Conditional theatei s Amphitheaters Conditional Philanthropic uses Permitted CODE CRITERIA / DISCUSSION / FINDINGS OF FACT A decision to amend the text of the zoning ordinance is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the City Council after consideration by the Planning Commission and is not controlled by any one standard. However, in making its decision concerning a proposed amendment, the Planning Commission and the City Council should consider the following factors. 21A.50.050 Standards for general amendments. A. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the adopted general plan of Salt Lake City. Discussion: The Planning Commission forwarded a recommendation to the City Council to adopt the Library Block Plan on August 17, 2000. The City Council will consider adopting this plan on January 2, 2001. The proposed text amendment is consistent with and helps to implement this plan. The text amendment is consistent with the adopted Central Community Development Plan that suggests that this block be developed with local government and public buildings. The existing zoning surrounding this block allows building heights ranging from 60 to more than 375 feet. Findings: The proposed amendments are consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the adopted general plan of Salt Lake City. Staff Report,Petition 400-00-61 4 December 14,2000 by the Salt Lake City Planning Division B. Whether the proposed amendment is harmonious with the overall character of existing development in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Discussion: The amendments to allow a greater building height and to allow amphitheaters and theaters require a conditional use approval process. The conditional use process will ensure compatibility with the overall character of existing development in the immediate vicinity of the Public Lands district. Findings: The proposed amendment provides a process to evaluate specific developments as to whether they are hainionious with the overall character of existing development in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. C. The extent to which the proposed amendment will adversely affect adjacent properties. Discussion: All Public Lands districts have been developed and are occupied with existing uses such as government facilities, schools, fire stations, public facilities and other institutional uses. The application of the proposed amendments will have limited utility in most Public Lands districts. The conditional use process will help mitigate adverse effects on adjacent properties. Findings: There will be limited opportunities to apply the proposed amendments and existing processes will help to alleviate adverse affects on adjacent properties. D. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Discussion: The proposed text amendment would be consistent with the administration of any applicable zoning overlays. The Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District is intended to protect the view corridor to the Utah State Capitol Building. This overlay prohibits the use of special provisions, special exceptions, conditional uses or incentives related to exceeding the maximum height allowed for the underlying zoning district. The State Capitol is the only PL use within this overlay district. There are several PL sites within the Historic Preservation Overlay District however; any impacts the proposed amendments may create can be mitigated through the regulations of the overlay district. Findings: The proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Staff Report,Petition 400-00-61 5 December 14,2000 by the Salt Lake City Planning Division E. The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, inclwading but not limited to roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, storm water drainage systems, water supplies, and waste water and refuse collection. Discussion: The proposed text amendment will affect all public lands districts within the City. New development that occurs within these areas will need to satisfy City standards. Findings: The adequacy of public facilities and services will not be adversely affected by the proposed text amendment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to the City Council to adopt an ordinance approving Petition 400-00-61 by the Salt Lake City Public Library requesting to amend the text of the PL Public Lands District by: 1. Amend the text of Section 21A.32.070 D (1) Maximum Building Height by adding "public libraries" to the list of specific uses that are allowed to take advantage of a greater building height; 2. Amend the text of Section 21A.32.070 D (1)Maximum Building Height by adding a conditional use provision to allow additional building height; and 3. Amend the Section 21A.32.140 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts to allow: • accessory retail sales and services intended for use by the general public as a permitted use; • philanthropic uses as a permitted use; and • movie theaters/live perfoimance theaters and amphitheaters as conditional uses. Respectfully submitted, Joel G. Paterson, AICP Senior Planner Staff Report,Petition 400-00-61 6 December 14,2000 by the Salt Lake City Planning Division 4,•',' S 0 , " \r•-r-r2...,-,%.".'4 1p,. 5 a It Lake (, 1 ty9 0 .. ' t ''.--'' - .) -Cr,f. ),-.;•, ,Il,I' ,..,,L\ .,...,,; ,,. I I _ I • 71 l‘r--11, n :IL_J [;,,,-;F:•\\t:..] f ', il -(L42;71,1.:P/," ,,,- •,-:-.7.,.-:-..:,::• ,',.. ! l.k,,,, 1 '''Kill'i 11:--1,E,1 q --, 'is ' ,k4 -'-''-",,,'N.:;:• 1(?-, L FU1211C La rid s .1,17N ld-61, L ilik R LI r -i—larki c-1 rl. 1 It•\ [1 I in, (,_,-\' 1111 ( '-'11'14-- \ film min fj rim rm)mi i i•7-;.:._,,.— ;1..1 1 r !i.\s., a I''''''17.1L41,-11' r. ,, -- II 11,1,1 1.111.1.11.11E U. U.1111 _11 i ..-I ,, II 1!..;1,41,1' :,S.,,,Pgi.,i'(,if]!,1,„•-7 ir-wr_rip,I.414 --.,-:"..---, :---, ,, I II dj.,.- (Ulf 1-ljil,iiiZIJI--1[111 H:"Jii A ri ui[7_'11&VIE ji r,L)-; .(--)Jiwri,,t1..iFq1-, , I .JT__-,.r. . *M11 I j'q!---,•7171-g-'1',1-'.'11-ii:, ' ‘,._ ..„_., ii Vr1 1 F-1C.i.Di'IL It.it r5Ni:lfifi I..,i 1.1 III IhillIR,1[197,kiiii ,Tibicli-1 ;',7... .',,t•..7 ,`, _„„ ,..,.,. ...„._igmeii_ZElt,{_ipi ,1'I if INF.i I,il''if,,r4r-FIT;'..'=-,-,4-. ''',; Public Lands LA./7.2 1r f 1 li ii 11 11 !; ...,'„,„ .4,,,-„'.; ;, ',H11, '','.'1. -.\.\.-‘. $... ' AP lii---,- -v-,'=`-:-„--5-41i[li . . ._. -, ,ic NIIIM f -IL 11 r rr I I 11,-,:-HI iror ,l'r --1-, Allk, ._-..--.2.-.:. , ."-I---',C '1 .', H,°1' ' 1 r ,r., ,_.-qr,-r 1,-1,,-1:7...5,--- 1'—' --- LI.,I.jt .,,_,I, !i ,II__ h r ifilr-,. Ir__,, :., iF_I,fr,r_-H.1.1.; d geVAL .[', , ., - -, 1_..[Nomongal[0,, ,._.-77.1 .., ,,,,,,.1 f'ft '14'$1.t,._rif - -iiI. ill,17-1,1,, ,P51][11T:%,,,,„ " [.._-1 Limes-Dm 1 . ii 1 mi IL;liE----; 'Ji.: Irf,iniAlEaHtir.0:I,--..l_toiri ii,..L *,,,,,- 1--11-ir---1 -F-ItiTiouiR1 ' • 1- I I( . 1.'ll.74-.1.1 imul,irrThi_ir--if_H..1-,]0§1111,10 Tit :ttei ,-,_-_ . .:Aio,th-i-E--,ie E-3 V -'16111[1151%3EVIPK[1][11 00,\V IIHU11..:RDFILIT.ErliirEITF-11--.4,17.1r4i.CM5 ,i, ."-Ir - '-'k\:.:(`,‘ !j-- 'IlEirj[173:Fr''TOL'Eel\‘T 1 il. lin.1P fr-59g ,2,..iwoyigfillipca Liriti4L 1 --- E -11-31-1111RP 1-1[11 LI.. II-ri.IE' Isci.1:4_111i1 11 ii ill Li Lii[fi ry DFF,t1 H,,i-0,1-1r-ri.-- I , , ---- IF1111361llg71.77aGihk,":2')fEL1`161:2A-1:_11 11111[11111[11OULIENIEIWI_OE111_4111r5...111111.11-ifAIllizi.-. .=ELTJK.JincyL,c,; ---, -Daiiim.311.1r2E--__7___ Es7-/6--C--T&Le: _;3P5-1,4.-4 or- ..a iii4.] --1 _, n 1-14JITIT i tj ."'.. 7/ CUD [IlfEEIJE c"-_ I i ( =0 p i E Di. f MINIM -TM;4-j , -1- F.,,.-. - __pT .._.... "" __(:;"MI . •-:31Q THIE[INggtP4 cqljjr/6‘-E.-3LLSD;-'34( 111-1 -' 5 ,iiii 1=3r"'" ENFOL...n6-105-EAL-1111.1FEDgitI1UHGEAP !L__—_-.011 iji_„_: .=Eii.,:,—,11,...-„ N III zia. :, il 011ioni::, 0:1 1=1EE13., Wall IE MI t/ 1.1211=11111pall _ `,7511 , L . A-`11=="111157 11011 ' ....... H_ , so 11F4ErwEEn EN Lii I----- -, -ww..m.„...,A eimis . N-t-/- - ,... __,Ilfii/L*LIED 111] [Iiiii"Nrcil; h .,....„......-= . iitTrium - I.: ! 491" I '"411111.8-S - SALT LAKE CITY ir— eiN ,i1 Q..-hr. 1 tht- gai, ._.L,__ kooft. _.. „,, __ -1,.....- _ ; - Palt: lig,64111 r-.10 , _ .. ---, .),.._' % - r.)*Rr b yrori-- ll- ,-..ic`"L-- --- 1-:-:-LriLy:;"- g_ifi HA ci---- r. ,- -Tin--Jz6=3:-.0:111lit December 2000 6 Pli j,---j 1*-747=1,k----LEIrin [77 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District: A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the PL Public Lands District is to specifically delineate areas of public use and to control the potential redevelopment of public uses, lands and facilities. B. Uses: Uses in the PL Public Lands District, as specified in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts found at Section 21A.32.140 of this Chapter, are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in Section 21A.32.010 of this Chapter and this Section. C. Minimum Lot Area And Lot Width: Minimum Minimum Land Use Lot Area Lot Width I. Public schools 5 acres 150 ft. 2. Other permitted uses 20,000 sq. ft. 75 ft. D. Maximum Building Height: 1. Local Government Facilities, Libraries, Prisons Or Jails, Government Offices, Arenas, Stadiums, Fairgrounds And Exhibition Halls: Seventy five feet (75'); provided, that where adjacent to a zoning district allowing greater height, the height standard of the adjacent district shall apply. A modification to the maximum building height provisions of this Section may be granted as a conditional use subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Part V, Chapter 21A.54 of this title, and subject to compliance with the applicable master plan. 2. Other Uses: Thirty five feet (35'). E. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Public School: a. Front Yard: Thirty feet (30'). b. Corner Side Yard: Thirty feet (30'). c. Interior Side Yard: Fifty feet (50'). d. Rear Yard: One hundred feet (100'). 2. Other Uses: a. Front Yard: Thirty feet (30'). b. Corner Side Yard: Thirty feet (30'). c. Interior Side Yard: Twenty feet (20'). d. Rear Yard: Thirty feet (30'). 3. Accessory Buildings And Structures In Yards: Accessory buildings and structures may be located in required yard areas subject to Table 21A.36.020B-ofthis Title. F. Required Landscape Yards: All front and corner side yards shall be maintained as landscaped yards in conformance with the requirements of Part IV, Chapter 21A.48 of this Title. G. Landscape Buffers: When a lot in the PL Public Lands District abuts a lot in a single-family or two-family residential district, landscape buffers, in accordance with the requirements of Part IV, Chapter 21A.48 of this Title, shall be required. (Ord. 26-95 §2(16-6), 1995) 21 A.32.140 Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Special Purpose Districts: LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AC AG AG OS A PI. ILI i1111 El MU -2 -5 -20Residential Assisted living — _-- ----- P facility(see Section 2I A.36.050 of ti is Title — — Congregate care P P P facility Dwelling units, above fusl floor commercial or office Group home,large (. (sec Section 21A.36.070 of this Title) Group home,small P P P P (see Section 21 A.36.070 of this Living quarters for P P P P P caretakers and secant wards Manufactured home P P P Mobile homes Multi-family(no maximum density limitation)Multiple-family P dwellings _ r— Nursing care facili 1— P P P Resident health cam p facility(see Section 21 A.36.040 of tins TitleZ — . Single-family P attached dwellings_ Single-family P P P P P detached dwellings Twin home and two- family dwellings .- j Rooming(boarding) _ P house LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH El MU -2 -5 -20 Office And Related Uses Accessory offices P supporting an institutional use Financial P P P3 institutions, with drive-through facilities Financial P P P institutions, without drive-through facilities Government offices P P P P P P P Medical and dental P n P P P offices Offices P P P Offices, research P P P related Veterinary offices, P P operating entirely within an enclosed building and keeping • animals overnight only for treatment purposes Retail Sales • And Services Accessory retail P P P P P P P sales and services uses,when located . _ • _ within the principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees Accessory retail p sales and services uses when located within a principal building Commercial service C establishments LEGEND PERMITTED D AND CONDITIONAL USES BY DISTRICT C=Conditional Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P—Permitted Use Use RP BI' FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL 1 III MII El MU -2 -5 -20 Gas station(may (-7 p;- include accessory convenience retail and/or minor repairs as defined in Part VI,Chapter 21 A.62 of this Title)_ Restaurants with C' P3 drive-through facilities Restaurants without C drive-through facilities Retail goods ti establishments Retail service P establishments Institutional Uses Adult daycare P P P Centers -- Child daycare P P P P 1' P I' centers Cemeteries and 1' accessory crematoriums Colleges and P P universities Community and I' P P P P recreation centers Conference center P - P C_ P_�. Convention center, with or without hotels - Convents and P P monasteries Dentallaboratories/ t' P C P research facilities Emergency response C and medical service • facilities including lire stations and living quarters Exhibition hall C C P LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH EI MU -2 -5 -20 Hospitals, including C P P accessory lodging facilities Libraries P P p Medical and dental P P p p p clinics Medical research P p p facilities Medical/nursing p schools Meeting halls of P p p p membership organizations Nursing care p p facility; sanitariums Pet cemetery p4 p4 p4 p4 p4,5 Philanthropic uses P P P Places of worship P P p Prison or jail C Religious assembly C P with exhibit hall Research, P P p C commercial, scientific, educational Reuse of schools C C C P and churches - Seminaries and p p P religious institutes Schools,K-12 p P private _ Schools,K-12 p public Schools, C P p P P professional/ vocational Recreation, Cultural And Entertainment Art galleries p Arenas,stadiums, C C C fairgrounds Botanical gardens C LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C= Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MI-I EI MU -2 -5 -20 Community gardens p as defined in Part VI, Chapter 21A.62 of this Title Country clubs p Dance studio p Golf courses p p p Movie theaters/live C p performance theaters Amphitheaters C I Museums C p p p Natural open space P p p p p p and conservation areas Nature preserves/ P p p p p p p conservation areas, public and private Park(public) C p p p Pedestrian p p pathways, trails and greenways Private recreational P p p p p facilities Tavern/ C lounge/brew pub; 2,500 square feet or less in floor area • Zoological park p Airport And Related Uses Air cargo terminals P p and package delivery facilities Airline service and p maintenance operations Airline ticketing and p baggage processing Airport operations p (including air traffic control,navigational aids, emergency and maintenance operations) LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C=Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS I'=Permitted Use Use RP RP FP AG AG AG AG OS A EL I UI MH El MU -2 -5 -20 Alcoholic beverage P consumption establishments(on- premises)(within terminal complex only) Automobile rental P a:encies Commercial P i recreation center (within terminal complex only Financial P institutions(within terminal complex only) — Fuel storage for on- P site distribution General aviation --_- P facilities Ileliport C C P C C Li•htmanufacturin• _ C Meeting rooms P (within terminal complex only) Offices Restaurants;other food services Retail goods P establishments- specialty,primarily . . . for airport customers(within ' terminal complex onl Retail services P establishments- primarily for airport customers(within terminal complex onl • --_ _—.— —_ - LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES C= Conditional BY DISTRICT Use SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS P=Permitted Use Use RP BP FP AG AG AG AG OS A PL I UI MH EI MU -2 -5 -20 Miscellaneous Accessory uses, P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P except those that are otherwise specifically regulated in this Chapter,or elsewhere in this Title Agricultural uses C P P P P P Bed and breakfast C2 P P Bed and breakfast C2 P p inn Bed and breakfast p p manor Communication P P C p p p p p towers Communication C C P C C C C towers, exceeding the maximum building height Concrete or asphalt p manufacturing Hotels and motels C C p p Industrial assembly P p Jewelry fabrication P and associated processing • Kennels,public or C P8 P8 P8 P8 private, on lots of 5 acres or larger8 Local government P P. - P - P. P p p P facilities Mining and p extraction of minerals and materials, including ore, stone,sand, gravel,oil and oil shale Off-site parking P C C C C Outdoor storage, P p p accessory Park and ride lots p C LEGEND PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES • BY DISTRICT C Conditional SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS Use P=Permitted Use Use RP BP El' AG AG AG AG OS A PI 1 UI MI-1 E1 i11U -2 -5 -20 Park and ride P P P P I' P P P parking,shared with existin use Parkmg structure P P P PP CC P P Production related to P C on-site research Public/private utility C CC CCCCCP CCCC C C buildings and structures Public/private utility PP P P P PPPP P P PP P P transmission wires, lines,pipes and poles 1 Radio station P�--— _-- - — _—,.-- --__—, Stable,private P P P P Stable public C C Storage of extracted P material Transportation P C terminals,including • bus,rail and trucking Trucking,repair, P storage,etc., associated with extractive industries_W arehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business(5,000 square foot or greater floor plate) _— • Warehouse, • P accessory to retail and wholesale business(maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) ---- ----- — ------ Warehouse, P P including mini- storage warehouses • Wholesale P P C distribution �. - Qualifying Provisions: 1. See subsection 21 A.02.050B of this Title for utility regulations. 2. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources. 3. When located on an arterial street. 4. Subject to Salt Lake City/County Health Department approval. 5. In conjunction with, and within the boundaries of,a cemetery for human remains. 6. Radio station equipment and antennas shall be required to go through the site plan review process to ensure that the color,design and location of all proposed equipment and antennas are screened or integrated into the architecture of the project and are compatible with surrounding uses. 7. When approved as part of a business park planned development pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.54.150 of this Title. 8. Kennels,public or private,whether within penned enclosures or within enclosed buildings, shall not be permitted within 200 feet of an existing single-family dwelling on an adjacent lot. (Ord. 14-00 §4, 2000: Ord. 9-00§ 3,2000: Ord. 35-99 § 41, 1999: Ord. 12-98 §4, 1998: amended during 5/96 supplement: Ord. 85-95 § 1 (Exh.A), 1995: Ord. 84-95 § 1 (Exh.A), 1995: Ord. 26-95 § 2(16-12), 1995) • t-. Goldsmith answered that he would like the Planning staff along with himself to •o thr. •h various parts of the report to ensure it is consistent with other mast= plan docum_ ts. Also would like to address some of the broader issues such a e open space cor ..or and how to deal with it long-term. Mr. Smith state. •e had two reactions. His thought as he went thro..h it, was that what we are already doing we don't seem to be doing very well. For -xample, he mentioned that when he walked • ough Liberty Park a couple of we- s ago the beautiful water features were sitting there •ry. He asked what kind of I -acy is this to have spent that kind of effort and then be not .- able to activate it at . *me of year when it should be. Mr. Smith stated that another thou. • is when e read the agenda and found this item listed, he expected to see huge numb s • people in attendance at the meeting, but was shocked to find such a few people i► . endance. Ms. Funk stated she really liked ►' . McDonald's '.ea that local groups are more aware of their needs, problems, an• desires than anyon- else. She really feels this issue should go back to the loca •roups. Mr. Daniels added ►- feels the one thing everyone is trying say is this document is just not ready. Ms. Fun ecommended that the hearing on this Petition be continueo to some later date . • -r the Planning Director and staff have had an opportunity to revie 't and make • so •- recommendations. Ms. Short seconded the motion. Ms. Funk, Ms, " Donald, r. Jonas and Mr. Daniels voted "Aye." Mr. Smith, as Chair, did not vote. The •otion passed. Public Hearing — Metropolitan Hall of Justice Block (a.k.a. Library Square) — The Planning Commission will receive public comment and consider making recommendations to the City Council on a revised Metropolitan Hall of Justice/Library Block Plan (200 East to 300 East and 400 South to 500 South) presented by the Salt Lake City Library Staff and project architects. Mr. Joel Paterson presented the staff report. Salt Lake City has been considering redeveloping the library block for a number of years. In the mid-1990s a local architectural firm, EDA was hired to develop a block plan and in 1998 a successful bond election was held. The proceeds from that bond are being used to finance the construction of a new library. As a result Moshe Safdie & Associate Architects was hired to design the library and explore different variations of the EDA plan that was developed for the block. Since they have been brought on board, they have attended various public meetings, open houses, and workshops. Since that time there have been several variations for the development of the block. Mr. Paterson continued by stating that last fall some concepts were developed involving mixed-use development on the eastern portion of the block which included office space Planning Commission Meeting 26 August 17,2000 and residential uses. However, Mayor Anderson has brought in a new vision for the eastern portion of this block, and Mr. Moshe Safdie and his team have developed an open-space concept to go along with the library. Mr. Paterson asked that the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to the City Council to hold public hearings and adopt the block plan for this block and asked if there were any questions. Mr. Paterson then turned the time to Mr. Safdie and his team to go through the details with the group. In addition to Mr. Safdie, Mr. Steve Crane of Valentiner Crane Architects was in attendance. Mr. Safdie displayed a model of the current plan for the library block. He began his presentation by explaining that the project started with the master plan that had been adopted. They then began working on the design combining housing, office space and possibly a hotel. A number of schemes were developed with the objective being that the area would not only house the library but serve as a major public meeting place, both indoor and outdoor. Some months ago in brainstorming sessions with the Mayor and others, it was decided to go back to first principles. How would one make this block the most effective and have a public gathering place which would become the focal point in terms of the full life of the City? Certain elements needed to be considered. In addition to shops, .an auditorium, and library, it would be nice to have a small cinema complex. It's important to put the existing library to good use to complement the activities. As a result of these sessions, it was concluded that the entire block should be an actively programmed open space plus the facilities which are already programmed and to combine it with the City and County Building with its open space to make a two-block park. The scheme that is currently being proposed shows the entire block as a series of open spaces in addition to the library, the existing library, piazza, cinema, etc. The eastern side is designed as an active part of the picture. Mr. Safdie pointed out that in building the complex, different grades will be dealt with. The grades build up gently towards a level one floor above the street level so that as you walk up you are looking down through the open part of the wall into a public piazza lined with shops, cinema, theaters, etc. The other corner gently terraces upward with an area for playgrounds, picnic area, and reading garden. The curved wall is designed as a climbable wall that can be ascended to reach the roof of the library that will also be a public park. Part of it is open to the library where patrons can come out of the library and sit outside. It would also serve as a place for receptions and other functions. This plan provides for a very urban, active piazza with a reflecting pool, a fountain, cafes, shops and, hopefully, a major restaurant a various public groups seeking to utilize the existing library. Planning Commission Meeting 27 August 17,2000 Ms. Short asked for an explanation of the shops. Mr. Safdie explained that the initial program included the accommodation of the kind of retail cafes that would be compatible with the library. He said he thinks this was partially inspired by the library at Vancouver where an urban room was created which housed a book shop, three or four levels of cafes and fast food, has a bank machine, and a post office. This provides services for not only library patrons but people planning on meetings at library square. Mr. Safdie explained that the shops are quite shallow, being only 15 feet deep. They have brought people in to share ideas concerning the kind of retail shops that would be appropriate for a complex of this kind. He added that the retail and entertainment are important to give the complex the kind of life it should have. Mr. Daniels asked about ADA issues with the project. Mr. Safdie responded that all ADA requirements have been addressed in spirit and by letter of the law. There is one element of the plan which is complex as far as ADA is concerned, and that is the climbable wall. Public access has been provided to the roof by elevators. However, the climbable wall itself will be restricted to those who are able to climb the wall. Throughout the remainder of the building and the plaza there are ramps and elevators provided for access. Ms. McDonald inquired if the amphitheater being where it is will there be reflections off that wall? Mr. Safdie explained that the angle of the sun in the summer is such that it will not present a problem. Also he explained that the wall is designed so that sound will travel through it. He further explained that there are details which still have to be worked out. Ms. Funk asked if the wall would obstruct the view of the City and County Building? Mr. Safdie explained that there is a large 30-foot high opening that would provide visual access to the City and County Building. Mr. Jonas asked whatpurpose the building to the north of the existing library, as shown on the model, would serve? Mr. Safdie said without knowing what will take place as to future users, from the point of view of spatial definition of the public piazza, it would be good to provide space for other entities such as additional shops or perhaps a small museum. Mr. Crane apologized for not having more drawings available for this meeting, but another meeting was scheduled for this night, and the other drawings were taken there. He did explain there is a scale model on display at the library. Planning Commission Meeting 28 August 17,2000 Mr. Smith told the group he is missing the housing that was included in the original plan, but doesn't see any way to bring it back. However, he feels it is incumbent upon the City to deal with the loss of housing. He pointed out that now people would have to drive their cars to get this beautiful park. He pointed out that in Vancouver hotels and offices were developed in the areas surround the new library. So there is potential for building housing is great. Planning mechanisms need to be put in place to guide the development. Mr. Safdie said rather than losing housing, the opportunity to develop housing around the perimeter is increased. Mr. Goldsmith added that there have been many conversations, not only with Mr. Safdie and his team, but with the Administration and many of the Planning staff who were dubious about getting rid of this mixed use on the eastern edge of the site. He said the Mayor is clearly committed to the opportunity for development of the surrounding blocks. Mr. Crane pointed out that rather than losing one street of housing that looks to a piazza, three streets of housing that look to a piazza and park are being gained. Mr. Smith stated he would really encourage a broader band of trees on 200 East. He said he may even go so far as to suggest there be only one lane of traffic in each direction on 200 East. Mr. Goldsmith suggested these ideas should be passed on directly to the City Council. Mr. Daniels inquired as to what the plan is for the existing library building. Mr. Safdie explained there is a proposal and several submissions have been received. Mr. Goldsmith said these are being handled by the RDA rather than the Planning Commission. Mr. Jonas asked how much parking will be available in the area. Mr. Safdie answered there will be parking beneath the building which will accommodate 700 cars. The parking area does not extend below the area where the trees are planted because the root system of the trees needs the area to expand. Mr. Daniels asked if there is parking provided for very large vehicles like buses. Mr. Safdie explained there is a small trucking dock. The parking is basically for cars. Mr. Daniels suggested this should be considered in order to accommodate the bus loads of children that come to the library. At a very minimum a drop-off place should be provided. Planning Commission Meeting 29 August 17,2000 Mr. Crane explained there is a book drop-off that would probably hold two buses which turns in off the back. The passengers could be dropped off there and the buses could exit from there. Mr. Smith asked that members of the public who would like to speak to please come forward. Cindy Cromer addressed the group and stated this is an exciting and interesting building. She asked how much of this block is going to be used in showcasing this building? What is the best use of this block to enhance this design? She stated there are some other things that should be looked at. Her concern focuses on spatial requirements of the City that need to be addressed. She pointed out that the City is currently paying rent in various buildings around town to house City Departments. Two that she mentioned are Transportation and Engineering. She pointed out that these two entities are in different buildings with miserable parking, and it deters people who are trying to participate in City government from obtaining information. It also deters the City employees from communicating with each other, and she has abundant examples of employees failing to communicate with each other. She stated that within one week this summer, there were no less than five instances during which she told City employees and City representatives things that she thought they already knew. These people learned them from her. She feels the City is looking itself into leases to pay rent in other buildings indefinitely, and this is being done regardless of what the market conditions are. She continued by stating that in addition to the issues of rent and poor communications, there is the maintenance issue. Since there isn't money to maintain neighborhood parks, where is the money coming from to maintain this new park? Is this money coming the from the bond money which has been approved? Did she commit to maintain this park in perpetuity? She asked the Commission to think about these things. The last issue Ms. Cromer addressed is the number of open spaces we currently have downtown. She listed the LDS Church properties, Block 57, Washington Square, the Gateway, Pioneer Square, City Creek and Memory Grove. She said there also may be others, but these are the major ones she noted. It is her feeling that the City should look at how much open space we now have and how we are going to pay to maintain this new area. Can we afford this? She asked that the Commission think about these things. She continued by stating that the City really needs to look at the issue of departments being scattered all over the City. Mr. Smith closed the public hearing and asked for further comments from the Commission. Ms. Funk she has thought about some of the same concerns Ms. Cromer mentioned. She stated there is not question that this complex is a magnificent structure, but cost is Planning Commission Meeting 30 August 17,2000 a real concern for her. She wonders if this is the appropriate time to do this. Are we better served to spend money at Pioneer Park rather than develop this area? The Mayor has been concerned about too much retail space in the City, and now we are adding more retail. Mr. Jonas asked if the bond is adequate to cover these costs? Mr. Smith asked Ms. Tessman to come forward and address these issues. Ms. Tessman stated the costs related to the east side of the block are not included in the bond and never were anticipated to be included. Originally, it was known that once the demolition occurred, a certain investment would have to be put into completing the area to the east. There is about $1.2 million in the actual proposed budget that was intended towards what was originally a very simple plan of doing this. Want to make sure that there is a very thorough discussion as to whether or not that $1.2 million is better invested in moving the project forward rather than spending it to replace the excavation on the east side of the block. She continued by saying that from the beginning the Library and those responsible for the bond money wanted to make sure there was a thoughtful approach as to what the future development would be on the east side of the block. She said that when Mayor Anderson came into office, he felt the idea of a green space should be more fully explored as an alternative to the original mixed-use proposal. However, there was never any intention that the bond money would include that part of the project. Se continued by saying they feel very comfortable that the budget they have is going to able to accomplish not only what was originally planned. Won't know what the actual contract is on the contract until closer to January or February. It is possible that if some of the budget estimates have been conservative, we may actually have some latitude within the bond to invest in what the City Council chooses to do. Hopeful there could be some investment from the bond beyond the $1.2 million, but she wanted to be very careful about that because the first priority is completing what was originally committed to the public to do. She also pointed out that the RDA, in their last budget discussions, agreed that if the revenues associated with the RDA exceeded the anticipated revenues this year, the City Council, acting as the RDA, agreed they would devote at least $2 million of that additional revenue to support this project. Mr. Crane explained that the shops proposed for this development wouldn't really be competing with other downtown retail. They are just small shops such a deli, a copy center. This is actually an opportunity for mom and pop shops to come back. Ms. Tessman added that this space is also being looked at for community purposes. Actually, when these spaces are developed the Library will be asking for proposals from groups like literacy organizations. She reported she has been working with the Center Planning Commission Meeting 31 August 17,2000 for Peace and Justice. They have thought that some of the space in the wall might be comfortable for Community Councils. The Councils have asked at the Library to provide them with space in the current facility. So the space is not being looked at solely as shops but as what can be done to enhance the idea of community and community services here. Ms. Tessman pointed out that the building on the west side, as a function of the library project, has office space comprising about 8,000 sf of space that will be available for lease. This space was intended for future growth of the library, but it has already been mentioned to Salt Lake City Corporation that there might be office spaces in that facility that could create some of the proximities and relationships that would prove helpful. Ms. Short added she felt the amphitheater might lend itself to some donor who would like to put their name on it depending upon what kind of dollars we are talking about. Ms. Tessman answered that right now for what we are seeing, in very conceptual form, has been costed out at somewhere in the vicinity of $5 million. She stated that $1.2 is potentially there because of the bond budget, if the City Council, acting as the RDA, is realistic about potential revenues, there is potentially another $2 million. It is her feeling the as a construction project, the money is not too far away, but maintenance is a very important factor. This is not property the library would feel a responsibility to maintain. Mr. Goldsmith reported there have been conversations with the Mayor and Ms. Tessman regarding this being a joint venture opportunity with such groups as Red Butte Arboretum. This could become an ancillary facility for them. In addition there are other opportunities that can be explored. Ms. McDonald stated this a very attractive block and has the potential for a dynamic number of people to utilize this facility. However, how does this new center relate to Pioneer Park, Gateway, Gallivan Plaza and all of those areas fit into the overall vision of the City. What is the policy? Mr. Goldsmith replied that that is a very important question, and the Planning Department is going before the City Council on September 12, 2000, to ask that same question. He stated he has been asked about the Pioneer Park problem. The RDA Board has approved the acceptance of proposals for the park, yet the City Council has not approved the development. So the question remains, can we develop something on Pioneer Park and what are the design parameters, how much of the park can be used? Do you get rid of the entire green space? Where is public domain going to be? These are questions that have to be answered by the City Council. Mr. Jonas moved that in the matter of the Metropolitan Hall of Justice block, aka Library Square, that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council, based on the findings of fact, a positive recommendation on the Plan that has been presented. Planning Commission Meeting 32 August 17,2000 Ms. Short seconded the motion. Mr. Daniels, Ms. Funk, Mr. Jonas, Ms. McDonald and Ms. Short voted "Aye." Mr. Smith, as Chair, did not vote. The motion passed. Ma Mas roTretU0 ary Planning Commission Meeting 33 August 17,2000 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDAS/MINUTES 6 St,ong recommendation Ihat angled harking is allowed Ms Arnold Ms Funk Mr Jonas Ms Short and Mr Daniels voted•Aye Ms McDonald opposed the notrnokon Mr Manger,and Ms Barrows were absent The motion passed H. PUBLIC(HEARING--Petition 400=00-61 by the Salt Lake Public Library requesting_to amend the text of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance to allow additional uses and modify the budding height provisions in the PL Public Lands zoning district and Petition 410 509 by the Salt Lake Public Library requesting Manned development approval for the new main blanch library to be constructed at 210 East 400 South located in the PI_Public Lands zoning district (Staff Joel Paterson al 535-6141) Mr Joel Paterson presented the staff report outlining the details of this case, the findings of fact and the staff recommendations,a copy of which is filed with the minutes Petition 400-00-61 regards amending the text of the PL Public Lands District • Petition 410509 regards modifications of the zoning ordinance standards listed below 1 Modification of the building height standard to allow construction of the library as presented, ? Modification of time maximum grade change provisions to allow the site improvements included on the site plan,and 3. Modification of the minimum front and coiner side yard setback requirement to accommodate the subterranean parking structure Mr Paterson then answered questions from the Commission Max Smith- Where is the parking structure,is that on 4'South') Joel Paterson: It will be entered from 4ir South as well as from 5m,South • Jeff Jonas: How did you decide what should be conditional and what should be permitted' Why are retail as well as movie theatres and an amphitheater permitted Joel Paterson. Mostly because of the potential impacts on the neighborhood These changes are tough changes,and they affect all public lands and districts within the city. Primarily schools,fire stations,city offices, state facilities,and that kind of thing. While it may be an issue around some neighborhoods, it might..not be on others. This gives us a little more control. The retail sales and services are "accessories." This gives us a lot of control over what those"accessories"are. Jeff Jonas: Won't we be opening a can of worms with people coming back and saying,"Well now we've got government competing,with these merchants here, by adding a permitted right to put these kinds of facilities in on public land'? Joel Paterson: We call them "accessory uses." That means that they have to be subordinate to the major use that's present. I don't think we'll have the problem of developers trying to build a strip mall at this small of a scale. I had a visit from John Price Realty,when t first received notice of this They had some concerns,came over and looked at the plan,and decided this isn't an issue. Stephen Goldsmith: It's not unlike the Art Barn having their Christmas Sale Crafts, or doing some festival • Jeff Jonas: Isn't there another protective overlay that is intended to protect the view to the City County building from the east? And does this infringe on that at all? Planning Commission Meeting 28 Ne"e'^her'f," ^0 12.lIN/Oa Joel Paterson No Aria Funk: I think the architect answered that for us Brent Wilde: What you might be Ihinking of Jeft is m Inc east downtown pian where there are some areas that are limited to 75 feet in height,and some go up to 120 feet I m not sure Joel where this hes Max Smith: I remember that That would be worth looking into Joel Paterson The urban design plan identifies this as the fringe area of the central business district It identifies building types up to 120 feet as appropriate The potential for the building heights in the surrounding zones are similar in height to what we're proposing Max Smith: It was more the RMU Corridors to the Cathedral of the Madeline, and those types of buildings Stephen Goldsmith Anything through a particular western view corridor Judi Short: If it could be no higher than surrounding buildings Joel Paterson: All the zoning around this site allows building freights of 60-75 feet, except for the strip along 4'"South,which is now CC and allows a building height of 35 feet We were hoping to change that I think in this location,the building we propose for the library is appropriate Judi Short: Look at this map,and look at those buildings It looks too tall for that neighborhood But you could tie it to what would be appropriate Joel Paterson. The conditional use process requires that we look at the master plan for that area In many cases the sites are residential zones, and even 75 feet, which is allowed, isn't appropriate on all sites Judi Short: I think we should use that Mr Smith turned the meeting over to the Public Hearing Ms.Nancy Tessman,the Library Director,at 1283 E South Temple,#401,and Mr Steve Crane of Crane Architects,located at 524 S.600 E,spoke to the Commission Steve Crane: The original master plan that was done some time ago,was never officially adopted, but did address those corridors, and the fact that they were not an issue, for the things that EVA were recommending. Max Smith: We actually approved that Jeff Jonas Did we lose a building in this one section? Joel Paterson This building is a future building Ms.Tessman: If I might elaborate a little on the potential for the shops on the site..We want to keep reiterating that our goal is to provide supportive retail,which is much more in the vein of,say a post office, or maybe a news/magazine shop. Things that address what the principle uses on the block make logical. Not to bring in any unrelated retail. .. We're also hoping that we will provide space for community organizations that may also help us vitalize the plaza from a different perspective. We've had interest from literacy organizations,and other kinds of community groups. Each of these retail spaces is only 400 square feet,they're really quite small. A few of them can be used in combination, and that would be a possibility. Suppose you were looking for a small cafe,to service the plaza from the outside. The intention is really not to be competitive retail,but rather supportive retail. Steve Crane: The Friends of the Library actually take a third of the space on the inside. • We've also left the door open to those people who've expressed interest in utilizing space in the current main library we don't know exactly what that resolution will he,but a few of those proposals were more appropriate for the wall space. Planning Commission Meeting 29 tfovcr146C11673B0t7 il- 141/oil Questions were asked by the Commission regarding various drawings found in the plan Mr Crane explained where the amphitheater would be located as well as a reflecting pool Mr SITIIIn opened the meeting to questions and no one responded He then closed the Public Hearing Max Smith: What a missed opportunity to not do something with second east,to stitch these two blocks together. Joel Paterson We're working on that Mary McDonald: Is anything being done with the light rail station as to having pedestrians coming oft at that point'? Steve Crane: We want to make a piazza at the northwest corner and bring the pavers right to the curb and gutter,which is typically not a city standard,so we're trying to ask permission to do that,to make this very welcoming Right now UDOT only wants the traffic to come to here and cross at the corner We planned for this station near a midblock walkway in the future_ We've had many discussions about that Ms.Tessman: We've also worked with the engineer designing the tight rail stops,because we feel it is important that that be integrated to the Library protect,rather than feeling like it's lust another station So the artist is excited to be able to make that connection exist Bip Daniels: I'm strongly against the possibility that people in groups would not be able to come down, and park There will be underground parking for buses,and for large vans2 Steve Crane: There's van access from here, and the city gets hall the parking,and the library uses the other half_ There are 300 plus car spaces for the library You can come in here,and go to the first floor of the library,and the buses come through at this drop off, right to the front door The employees come in another way You can get a 9-person van into the parking garage Motions for Case Nos.400-00-61 and 410-509 Jeff Jonas: In the matter cif Petition 400-00-61 by the Salt Lake Public Library requesting to amend the text of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance to allow additional uses and modify the building height provisions in the Pt_Public Lands zoning district , I'd like to make the motion that we forward a positive recommendation to the City Council to adopt and ordinance approving Petition 400-00-61 And add philanthropic uses as permitted uses Mr Dip Daniels seconded the motion. Ms.Arnold,Ms. Barrows, Ms. Funk,Mr.Jonas, Ms.Short,Mr. Daniels,and Ms. McDonald,voted"Aye". Mr.Smith,as•Chairperson,did not vote.The motion passed. , • Jeff Jonas: And in the matter of Petition 410-509 by the Salt Lake Public Library requesting planned development approval for the new main branch library to be constructed at 210 East 400 South,located ill - - the Pt-Public Lands zoning district. Based upon the findings of fact, I make a motion that we grant plan development approval for this petition, based upon the plan submitted for Planning Commission consideration,including the modifications of the zoning ordinance listed as numbers 1,2,3,and that it be subject to compliance with Salt Lake City Departmental requirements,and the final plans be reviewed by the Planning Director. Ms.Judi Short seconded the motion. Ms.Arnold, Ms Barrows,Ms. Funk, Mr Jonas, Ms Short, Mr Daniels,and Ms. McDonald,voted"Aye" Mr.Smith,as Chairperson,did not vote:The motion passed. Planning Commission Meeting 30 Dlrwembow 16,2000 r Z 1/,fl err:, Ms Kay (berger)Arnold made the motion that the meeting be adjourned Ms Judi Short seconded the motion The meeting adjourned at 10 37 p m NOTE: Final decision on Petition No 400-00-52 from the Salt Lake City Administration regarding parking in front of commercial buildings, between the building and the street, within all neighborhood oriented commercial zones (RB Residential Business, RMU Residential Mixed Use, MU Mixed Use, CN Neighborhood Commercial, CB Community Business, CS Shopping Center, CC Commercial Corridor, SHBD Sugar House Business District), was not reviewed at this meeting The petition requests eliminating parking in the front yard(between the front property line and the building)and to adopt other neo-traditional town planning concepts to encourage a more walkable community throughout Salt Lake City. Christine Wade,Secretary • Planning Commission Meeting 31 1C,2800 1z_liy/OD