The URL can be used to link to this page

06/13/1989 - Minutes PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIT , UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of the Whole on Tuesday, June 13, 1989, at 5:00 p.m. in Room 325, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Florence Bittner Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Willie Stoler Sydney Fonnesbeck Council Chair Stoler presided at the meeting. Cindy Gust-Jenson distributed a been made. She said that the copy of the agenda addendum con- list of legislative intents was cerning using 14th Year Community still the same except for the Development Block Grant monies to addition of one intent. fund the transportation of plants for CDBG eligible areas. Council Ms. Gust-Jenson said the Coun- Member Stoler informed the Council cil would have to meet on Thurs- that a greenhouse operation was day, June 15, 1989, to correct a going out of business in Cali- mistake in the water and sewer fornia and a member of a Salt Lake rate ordinance notice if the community council, who had a Council wanted to include a rebate contact at the business, suggested program. She said the Council that Salt Lake might want to could give tentative approval in acquire the plants instead of the Council meeting on June 13, letting them be destroyed. So, he but would have to ratify it on said, the Capital Planning staff June 15. She reviewed the motions brought the idea before the Coun- regarding various scenarios in- cil. volving the water and sewer rates and said that Jim Lewis of Public Ms. Gust-Jenson said that since Utilities would be in the meeting the original offer was made, many to answer questions. of the plants had been sold to other greenhouses and the staff Ms. Gust-Jenson reviewed the was no longer sure that the idea agenda saying that the staff was still feasible. Council recommendations for the items Members asked about the type and remained the same as printed. She quality of plants being offered said that Jeff Brimhall, financial and the cost for storing and advisor from Ehrlich Bober, would planting. . Ms. Gust-Jenson said it be available to answer questions would take additional staff work about the Special Improvement to determine if the City would District bonds, and that Buzz benefit from the plants and sug- Hunt, City Treasurer, would be gested that the Council could available to answer question approve the expenditure contingent concerning the Tax Anticipation on staff review. Revenue bonds. Ms. Gust-Jenson then distri- Council Chair Stoler said Ms. buted and reviewed the proposed Gust-Jenson approached him about motions saying that the new ver- closing the office Friday, June sion had the dollar values insert- 16, 1989, to allow the staff a day ed and some technical changes had off to recover from the budget. There were no objections. 89-162 PROCIPINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI , UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in regular session on Tuesday, June 13, 1989, at 6:00 p.m. in Room 315, City Council Chambers, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Florence Bittner Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Willie Stoler Sydney Fonnesbeck Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Kathryn Marshall, City Recorder, and Lynda Domino, Chief Deputy City Recorder, were present. Council Chair Stoler presided at the meeting and Councilmember Godfrey conducted the meeting. OPENING CEREMONIES Central Business Improvement District Board of Directors. #1. The invocation was given (I 89-11) by Police Chaplain Ferdinand Johnson. #2. RE: Setting a date for a public hearing for Tuesday, July #2. The Council led the 11, 1989, at 6:40 p.m. to obtain Pledge of Allegiance. public comment concerning Petition No. 400-731 submitted by Clark #3. Councilmember Kirk moved Development requesting that Salt and Councilmember Hardman seconded Lake City rezone property located to approve the minutes of the Salt between Simpson Avenue and Inter- Lake City Council for the regular state 80 and between Highland meetings held Tuesday, June 6, Drive and 1300 East Street from 1989, and Thursday, June 8, 1989, Residential "R-2" and Commercial which motion carried, all members "C-1" to a Commercial "C-3" clas- voted aye. sification. (M 89-1) (P 89-176) #3. RE: Setting a date for a COMMENTS public hearing for Tuesday, July 18, 1989, at 6:50 p.m. to obtain There were no comments to the public comment concerning Petition Mayor or Council. No. 400-732 submitted by Clark Development requesting that Salt Lake City vacate public streets CONSENT AGENDA and alleys in the area located between Simpson Avenue and Inter- Councilmember Bittner moved state 80 and between Highland and Councilmember Kirk seconded to Drive and 1300 East Street. approve the consent agenda, which (P 89-177) motion carried, all members voted aye. #4. RE: Setting a date for a public hearing for Tuesday, July #1. RE: Approving the ap- 18, 1989, at 6:20 p.m. to obtain pointment of James Stewart to the public comment concerning Petition 89-163 PROCINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI , UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 No. 400-668 submitted by Club ACTION: Without objection DejaVu requesting that Salt Lake Councilmember Godfrey pulled this City change the license ordinance item from the agenda. concerning location restrictions for Class B Private Clubs. DISCUSSION: Councilmember (P 89-173) Stoler explained that Ken Eltinge, Sugar House Community Council and #5. RE: Setting a date for initiator of this project, had a public hearing for Tuesday, July contacted the business in Cali- 18, 1989, at 6:30 p.m. to obtain fornia that had the plants and public commentconcerning Petition discovered that the plants were No. 400-710 submitted by Thelma useless for Salt Lake City. He and Gilbert Iker requesting that said Mr. Eltinge asked him to Salt Lake City rezone a portion of thank the Council, Mayor and City their property at 1307 South 900 Staff for their time and effort West form Residential "R-2" to a regarding this idea but said at Business "B-3" classification. this point it would be a waste of (P 89-174) money to transport the plants to Salt Lake. #6. RE: Setting a date for (T 89-12) a public hearing to be held Tues- day, July 18, 1989, at 6:40 p.m. to obtain public comment concern- UNFINISHED COUNCIL BUSINESS ing Petition No. 400-669 submitted by William and Mary Ann DeNiro #1. RE: A resolution autho- requesting that Salt Lake City rizing the issuance and providing rezone property located at 360-366 for the sale of Salt Lake City South 900 West from a Residential $650,000 Special Assessment Bonds, "R-6" to a Business "B-3" classi- Series 1989, Concrete Replacement fication. Special Improvement District No. (P 89-175) 40-R-13 (Non-Contiguous Streets) providing for the pricing and terms of the bonds, prescribing NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS the form of bonds, the maturity and denomination of said bonds; #1. RE: An ordinance amending providing for the continuance of Title 12, Chapter 44, Section 210, a guaranty fund; authorizing and Subparagraph A, of the Salt Lake approving the form of a bond City Code, 1988, relating to stop purchase agreement and the offi- intersections and re-lettering cial statement, and related mat- subsequent subparagraphs. ters. ACTION: Without objection ACTION: Councilmember Kirk Councilmember Godfrey referred moved and Councilmember Hardman this to the consent agenda. seconded to adopt Resolution 84 of (0 89-27) 1989, which motion carried, all members voted aye. #2. RE: A motion reducing (Q 87-3) the 14th Year Community Develop- ment Block Grant fund contingency #2. RE: A resolution autho- by $7, 500 to $13, 785 and allo- rizing the issuance and providing cating $7, 500 to fund the trans- for the sale of Salt Lake City portation of plants for CDBG eli- $144, 000 Special Assessment Bonds, gible areas. Series 1989, Concrete Special 89-164 PROCAINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI , UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 Improvement District No. 40-R-16 es; and related matters. (Avenues Cross Drain Project) providing for the pricing and ACTION: Councilmember Kirk terms of the bonds, prescribing moved and Councilmember Bittner the form of bonds, the maturity seconded to adopt Resolution 87 of and denomination of said bonds; 1989, which motion carried, all providing for the continuance of a members voted aye. guaranty fund; authorizing and approving the form of a bond DISCUSSION: Jeff Brimhall, purchase agreement and the offi- Ehrlich-Bober, said they received cial statement, and related mat- 12 bids- which were very competa- ters. tive. He said the winning bidder was Morgan Stanley and the net ACTION: Councilmember Kirk effective interest rate was 5.84%, moved and Councilmember Bittner which was very good. seconded to adopt Resolution 85 of (Q 89-4) 1989, which motion carried, all members voted aye. #5. RE: An ordinance amend- (Q 88-2) ing Sections 17. 16. 670 and 17.72. - 030 of the Salt Lake City Code #3. RE: A resolution autho- relating to water and sewer rates. rizing the issuance and providing for the sale of Salt Lake City ACTION: Councilmember Bittner $280,000 Special Assessment Bonds, moved and Councilmember Hardman Series 1989, 900 West Curb and seconded to adopt Ordinance 33 of Gutter Extension Special Improve- 1989, amending Section 17. 16. 670, ment District No. 38-757 providing 17. 16. 680 and 17.72.030, to re- for the pricing and terms of the flect an increase in city water bonds, prescribing the form of rates to 43Q for city residents bonds, the maturity and denomina- and 64Q for non-city residents tion of said bonds; providing for offset by a decrease in sewer the continuance of a guaranty rates to 80Q, and increasing the fund; authorizing and approving minimum charge to $6.45, which the form of a bond purchase agree- motion carried, all members voted ment and the official statement, aye, except Councilmembers Fonnes- and related matters. beck and Godfrey who voted nay. ACTION: Councilmember Kirk Councilmember Hardman moved moved and Councilmember Bittner and Councilmember Bittner sec- seconded to adopt Resolution 86 of onded to adopt Ordinance 33 of 1989, which motion carried, all 1989 amending Sections 17. 16. 670, members voted aye. 17. 16. 680 and 17. 72.030 of the (Q 87-2) Salt Lake City Code to reflect an increase in city water rates #4. RE: A resolution autho- offset by a decrease in sewer rizing the issuance and confirming rates as proposed by the Depart- the sale of the $17, 500,000 Tax ment of Public Utilities, and and Revenue Anticipation Notes, establishing a low-income abate- Series 1989, of Salt Lake City; ment program, which motion car- providing for covenants to estab- ried, all members voted aye except lish and maintain the excludabil- Councilmember Kirk who voted nay. ity of interest on the notes from (This motion required ratification gross income of the holders there- on Thursday, June 15, 1989. ) of for federal income tax purpos- 89-165 PROCAPINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI , UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 DISCUSSION: Jim Lewis, public abatement would see a net decrease utilities, outlined several op- of $3.00 per year. He said either tions. He said the Mayor's pro- the Mayor's proposal or the second posal increased the minimum by or third options he outlined would $1 .00 and the usage by 40; the generate the same amount of mon- second option was to increase the ey - $2,000,000 for capital im- minimum by 750 and the usage rate provements; the abatement would by 50; the third option was to decrease this amount by $30, 254. increase the minimum by 500 and the usage by 60. Councilmember Godfrey said with the usage rate increase it He said the Mayor' s proposal seemed that if some users' rates would basically increase the would be lower then the other rate annual water bill for a small users would subsidize them. Mr. residential unit by $12.00 and Lewis said this would shift the decrease the sewer bill by $4.80 burden from the small users to the resulting in a total net increase heavy users and would change from of $7. 20 per year. He said the a fixed monthly minimum rate to a average residential bill would variable rate based on seasonal increase about $19.04 per year fluctuations. minus a $5.40 sewer decrease which would be a total of $13.64 more Councilmember Hardman asked per year. He said the second who was typically the small user. option would realize a $9 .00 Mr. Lewis said the small user was increase in the water rate with a one or two people in a small home $4.80 decrease in sewer which with a small yard. An average would be $4.20 more per year, and residential user would be someone the last option would increase the with a larger yard who used over water by $6.00 per year with a the minimum. $4. 80 sewer decrease for a total increase of $1.20 per year. Councilmember Bittner said she was concerned about the senior He said if the Council in- citizens who did not qualify or cluded an abatement program, were not eligible for the abate- qualifying owners would realize an ment program. She said a lot of additional 600 per month decrease those people were in small homes or $7. 20 per year. Councilmember with one or two people so the Fonnesbeck asked what the impact second option would bring the of this would be on the budget and sewer rate decrease and the water Mr. Lewis said it would cause a rate increase closer together and decrease of $30, 254. they would not see a big change on their water bill. Councilmember Godfrey re- ferred to the options Mr. Lewis Councilmember Horrocks asked outlined and asked if they already how much money was in the capital included the abatement. Mr. Lewis improvement budget. Mr. Lewis said they did not and added that said they currently budgeted if the Council included the abate- $5,000, 000 for next year, with ment program with the second and $2, 000,000 realized from the rate third options he outlined, the increase. He said $1, 500,000 was annual bill would be reduced by an for watershed land purchase which additional $7.20; so under the would decrease the capital im- second option, the small residen- provement budget to $3, 500,000. tial user who qualified for the 89-166 PROCEOPINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI , UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 In reference to the rate those senior citizens who quali- changing from fixed to variable, fied. He said currently they Mayor DePaulis asked what effect could take advantage of the abate- this would have. Mr. Lewis said ment for the garbage collection during a very dry year with enough fee and he thought their should be water to supply, the department a program available for utilities could generate more money; during since they were a basic necessity. a very wet year they would gen- erate a lot less. He said if they Councilmember Godfrey asked had a dry year and not enough if with the abatement some people water to sell, they wouldn't gen- would pay less than they - were erate as much money. Council- presently. Mr. Lewis said that member Bittner pointed out that people who qualified for the this variable income was only a abatement program could realize a small portion of their revenue. $3.00 per year decrease in their combined water and sewer bill. The Mayor asked if under the (0 89-16) sewer decrease the big water users would benefit the most. Mr. Lewis #6. RE: An ordinance enact- said they would get a large share ing Section 15. 16.070 of the Salt of the rate reduction since the Lake City Code providing for sewer rate was based on sewer admission fees to Tracy Aviary. usage during the winter months and the large users paid a large ACTION: Councilmember Hor- share. rocks moved and Councilmember Hardman seconded to adopt Ordi- Councilmember Kirk asked Mr. nance 34 of 1989 charging $.75 Lewis if they had considered the for persons 6 to 12 years and variable rate. Mr. Lewis said $1.25 for persons 13 to 64 years, their board considered it and which motion carried, all members recommended the Mayor' s proposal. voted aye except Councilmember Bittner who voted nay. Councilmember Bittner indi- cated the variable rate would be Councilmember Hardman moved more equitable since the big water and Councilmember Horrocks sec- users would pay more for water but onded to increase the parks de- would benefit more from the sewer partment aviary fund by $30,000 to decrease. Mr. Lewis said this was reflect an increase in aviary possible although each user was entrance fees to fund the security different and it was hard to draw contract at the aviary, which a good comparison. motion carried, all members voted aye. In regards to adopting the abatement program, Roger Cutler, DISCUSSION: Mayor DePaulis city attorney, said there was a said the fees would address the question as to whether or not this security guard issue. was adequately noticed on the agenda so he said this would have Councilmember Hardman said to be renoticed and ratified at a the $30, 000 to fund the security subsequent meeting. contract would come from the fees to be charged. Councilmember Hardman said he thought it was important to pro- Councilmember Bittner asked vide an abatement program for what would happen if the city didn' t get $30,000 in fees. 89-167 PROCEOINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 Councilmember Hardman said the #10. RE: An ordinance city had projected getting $133, - amending Section 2. 52. 115 of the 000. Mrs. Bittner said the fees Salt Lake City Code relating to were also going to be used to pay compensation and benefits for Salt for other projects in addition to Lake City Corporation 400 Series the security guard. Mayor Employees. DePaulis said the security guard would have a higher priority. ACTION: Councilmember Fon- (0 89-17) nesbeck moved and Councilmember Kirk seconded to table this to #7. -RE: An ordinance amend- July 11, 1989, which motion car- ing Section 2. 52.010 of the Salt ried, all members voted aye. Lake City Code, as last amended by (0 89-21) Bill No. 44 of 1988 relating to compensation of Salt Lake City #11. RE: A resolution Corporation officers and employ- approving a Memorandum of Under- ees, including statutory officers. standing between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American ACTION: Councilmember Kirk Federation of State, County and moved and Councilmember Fonnesbeck Municipal Employees, Local 1004 seconded to adopt Ordinance 35 of for Salt Lake City' s 200 Series 1989, which motion carried, all employees. members voted aye. (0 89-20) ACTION: Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Bittner #8. RE: A resolution ap- seconded to table this to July 11, proving a Memorandum of Under- 1989, which motion carried, all standing between Salt Lake City members voted aye. Corporation and the Salt Lake City (C 89-308) Police Association. #12. RE: A resolution ACTION: Councilmember Kirk approving a Memorandum of Under- moved and Councilmember Fonnesbeck standing between Salt Lake City seconded to table this to July 11, Corporation and the American 1989, which motion carried, all Federation of State, County and members voted aye. Municipal Employees, Local 1004 (C 89-310) for Salt Lake City Corporation' s 100 Series employees. #9. RE: A resolution ap- proving a Memorandum of Under- ACTION: Councilmember Kirk standing between Salt Lake City moved and Councilmember Bittner Corporation and the International seconded to table this to July 11, Association of Firefighters, Local 1989, which motion carried, all 1645. members voted aye. (C 89-307) ACTION: Councilmember Hard- man moved and Councilmember Kirk #13. RE: An ordinance seconded to table this to July 11, adopting final budgets of Salt 1989, pending ratification of the Lake City, Utah, including the contract by the union membership, library fund budget, for the which motion carried, all members fiscal year beginning July 1, voted aye. 1989, and ending June 30, 1990. (C 89-309) 89-168 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI• UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 ACTION: REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS onded to increase general fund revenue fund projections by an ad- Enterprise Funds ditional $30,000 to reflect an in- crease in Tracy Aviary entrance Councilmember Hardman moved fees, which motion carried, all and Councilmember Fonnesbeck sec- members voted aye. onded to decrease water utility fund projected revenues by $30, 254 Councilmember Kirk moved and to reflect the implementation of a Councilmember Fonnesbeck seconded low-income abatement program, to increase general fund revenue which motion carried, all members projections by an additional voted aye. $30,000 to reflect a reimbursement by the state for election costs, General Fund which motion carried, all members voted aye. Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Hardman seconded to EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS adjust the general fund revenues to reflect current projections as Enterprise Funds follows: Increase the projected property tax revenue by $294, 172 Councilmember Kirk moved and and decrease projected franchise Councilmember Bittner seconded to tax collections by $120, 640, which decrease the airport fund contri- motion carried, all members voted butions to employee health insur- aye. ance premiums by $31, 800, which motion carried, all members voted Councilmember Kirk moved and aye. Councilmember Hardman seconded to increase general fund revenue pro- Councilmember Kirk moved and jections by $100, 000 to reflect a Councilmember Hardman seconded to transfer from the central fire increase the airport fund admini- dispatch fund balance, which mo- strative service charges paid to tion carried, all members voted the general fund by $19, 657, which aye. motion carried, all members voted aye. Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Bittner seconded to Councilmember Kirk moved and increase general fund revenue pro- Councilmember Hardman seconded to jections by an additional $47, 600 increase the airport fund contin- to reflect a transfer from the gency by $12, 143, which motion worker' s compensation fund bal- carried, all members voted aye. ance, which motion carried, all members voted aye. Refuse Collection Fund Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Bittner seconded to Councilmember Hardman seconded to increase general fund revenue pro- decrease the refuse collection jections by an additional $63, 844 fund contribution to employee reflecting the repayment of the health insurance premiums by PEHP deficit, which motion car- $2, 668, which motion carried, all ried, all members voted aye. members voted aye. Councilmember Hardman moved Councilmember Kirk moved and and Councilmember Fonnesbeck sec- Councilmember Fonnesbeck seconded 89-169 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 to increase the refuse collection Public Utilities fund administrative service charg- es paid to the general fund by Councilmember Kirk moved and $1, 569, which motion carried, all Councilmember Horrocks seconded to members voted aye. decrease the water utility con- tribution to employee health Councilmember Kirk moved and insurance premiums by $35,376, Councilmember Bittner seconded to which motion carried, all members increase the refuse collection voted aye. fund contingency by $1,099, which motion carried, all members voted - Councilmember Kirk moved and aye. Councilmember Horrocks seconded to increase the water utility admin- Golf Course Fund istrative service charges paid to the general fund by $20, 709, which Councilmember Hardman moved motion carried, all members voted and Councilmember Kirk seconded to aye. decrease the golf course fund contribution to employee health Councilmember Kirk moved and insurance premiums by $4,212, Councilmember Horrocks seconded to which motion carried, all members increase the water utility fund voted aye. contingency by $14, 667, which motion carried, all members voted Councilmember Hardman moved aye. and Councilmember Fonnesbeck seconded to increase the golf Councilmember Kirk moved and course fund administrative service Councilmember Hardman seconded to charges paid to the general fund decrease the sewer utility contri- by $2, 454, which motion carried, bution to employee health insur- all members voted aye. ance premiums by $15,084, which motion carried, all members voted Councilmember Hardman moved aye. and Councilmember Kirk seconded to increase the golf course fund Councilmember Kirk moved and contingency by $1, 758, which Councilmember Hardman seconded to motion carried, all members voted increase the sewer utility fund aye. administrative service charges paid to the general fund by Councilmember Kirk moved and $8, 831, which motion carried, all Councilmember Hardman seconded to members voted aye. transfer $20, 726 from the golf course fund personal services to Councilmember Kirk moved and contingency and eliminate 2.08 FTE Councilmember Hardman seconded to reflecting the elimination of .35 increase the sewer utility fund FTE seasonal golf marshal and 1.73 contingency by $6, 253, which FTE golf seasonal grounds keepers, motion carried, all members voted which motion failed, Council- aye. members Bittner, Horrocks, Fonnes- beck, Stoler voted nay and Coun- Councilmember Hardman moved cilmembers Hardman, Godfrey, and and Councilmember Bittner seconded Kirk voted aye. to decrease the water utility capital improvement fund budget by $30, 254 reflecting a decrease in revenues as a result of the low- 89-170 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI• UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 income abatement program, which members voted aye, except Council- motion carried, all members voted member Fonnesbeck who was absent aye except Councilmember Fonnes- for the vote. beck who was absent for the vote. Councilmember Kirk moved and GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTS Councilmember Horrocks seconded to decrease the fleet maintenance in- Across the Board ternal service fund charge for employee health insurance premiums Councilmember Kirk moved and by $9,304, which motion carried, Councilmember Bittner seconded to all - --members voted aye except increase the general fund budget Councilmember Fonnesbeck who was by $386, 525 to reflect changes in absent for the vote. personal services, which motion carried, all members voted aye Councilmember Kirk moved and except Councilmember Fonnesbeck Councilmember Hardman seconded to who was absent for the vote. increase the fleet maintenance internal service fund administra- Councilmember Kirk moved and tive service charge paid to the Councilmember Horrocks seconded to general fund by $5,453, which decrease risk management premiums motion carried, all members voted paid by all funds by a total of aye. $9,397 to be applied department by department as follows: Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Bittner seconded to Finance - $ 696 increase the fleet maintenance in- Police - 2, 898 ternal service fund contingency by Public Works - 1, 536 $3, 851, which motion carried, all Parks and Recreation - 967 members voted aye. Community/Economic Development - 421 Councilmember Kirk moved and Administrative Services - 390 Councilmember Horrocks seconded to Mayor - 86 decrease the information manage- Fire Department - 2,091 ment services internal service Attorney' s Office - 115 fund charge for employee health Human Resource Management 120 insurance premiums by $6,048, Council Office - 77 which motion carried, all members voted aye. $9,397 Councilmember Kirk moved and which motion carried, all members Councilmember Horrocks seconded to voted aye except Councilmember increase the information manage- Fonnesbeck who was absent for the ment services internal service vote. fund administrative service charge paid to the general fund by Administrative Services $3, 533, which motion carried, all members voted aye. Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Hardman seconded to Councilmember Kirk moved and appropriate $5, 179 from infor- Councilmember Hardman seconded to mation management services inter- increase the information manage- nal service fund balance to re- ment services internal service flect changes in personal ser- vices, which motion carried, all 89-171 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIl, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 fund contingency by $2, 515, which seconded to decrease the govern- motion carried, all members voted mental immunity internal service aye. fund charge for employee health insurance premiums by $320, which Councilmember Fonnesbeck motion carried, all members voted moved and Councilmember Kirk aye. seconded to increase the fleet management internal service fund Councilmember Fonnesbeck appropriation of fund balance by moved and Councilmember Kirk $55,000, which motion carried, all seconded to increase the govern- members voted aye. mental immunity internal service fund administrative service charg- Councilmember Fonnesbeck es paid to the general fund by moved and Councilmember Kirk $186, which motion carried, all seconded to decrease fleet manage- members voted aye. ment internal service fund reve- nues from the general fund by Councilmember Fonnesbeck $155,000, which motion carried, moved and Councilmember Horrocks all members voted aye. seconded to increase the govern- mental immunity internal service Councilmember Fonnesbeck fund contingency by $134, which moved and Councilmember Kirk sec- motion carried, all members voted onded that the administrative ser- aye. vices election budget be increased by $30, 000 to cover the costs of a City Council statewide referendum, which motion carried, all members voted aye. Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Kirk sec- Councilmember Fonnesbeck onded to decrease the city council moved and Councilmember Horrocks office budget by $1, 512 to reflect seconded to decrease the admini- a correction of Council Member strative services, office of the salaries, which motion carried, director, by $101,427 to reflect all members voted aye. the elimination of two FTEs as a result of consolidation of the Community and Economic Development departments of administrative ser- vices and human resource manage- Councilmember Fonnesbeck ment, which motion carried, all moved and Councilmember Hardman members voted aye. seconded to increase the general fund transfers to the demolition Councilmember Fonnesbeck special revenue fund by $5, 000 to moved and Councilmember Kirk meet existing needs, which motion seconded to decrease the admini- carried, all members voted aye. strative services, fleet replace- ment fund, by $100, 000 to be a net Finance reduction accommodating offsetting increased maintenance costs, which Councilmember Fonnesbeck motion carried, all members voted moved and Councilmember Bittner aye. seconded to reduce the finance department budget by $27, 540 to Attorney's Office eliminate funding for land rentals which was budgeted under the parks Councilmember Fonnesbeck department CIP fund, which motion moved and Councilmember Kirk carried, all members voted aye. 89-172 PROCERINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIl, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 Councilmember Fonnesbeck Human Resource Management moved and Councilmember Kirk seconded to reduce the finance Councilmember Fonnesbeck department budget by $2, 610 to moved and Councilmember Kirk eliminate funding for employee seconded to decrease the risk parking which was budgeted under management internal service fund support services, which motion charges for employee health in- carried, all members voted aye. surance premiums by $1, 140, which motion carried, all members voted Councilmember Bittner moved aye. and -Councilmember Kirk seconded - - - - that the finance department budget Councilmember Fonnesbeck be reduced by $36,900 eliminating moved and Councilmember Kirk sec- funding for one internal auditor onded to increase the risk manage- but that the FTE not be reduced, ment internal service fund admini- which motion carried, all members strative service fee charges paid voted aye except Councilmember to the general fund by $665, which Fonnesbeck who voted nay. motion carried, all members voted aye. Fire Department Councilmember Fonnesbeck Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Kirk sec- seconded to reduce the risk man- onded to decrease the E911 dis- agement internal service fund patch special revenue fund charges payment to PEHP by $242, 000 and for employee health insurance reduce insurance premium revenues premiums by $1,344, which motion by $242,000, which motion carried, carried, all members voted aye. all members voted aye. Councilmember Fonnesbeck Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Bittner moved and Councilmember Kirk sec- seconded to increase the E911 dis- onded to reduce the risk manage- patch special revenue fund admini- ment internal service fund contri- strative service fee charges paid bution to fund balance by $191, - to the general fund by $789, which 599, which motion carried, all motion carried, all members voted members voted aye. aye. Councilmember Fonnesbeck Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Kirk sec- seconded to appropriate $47, 600 of onded to increase the E911 dis- worker' s compensation fund balance patch special revenue fund contin- to transfers to the general fund, gency by $555, which motion car- which motion carried, all members ried, all members voted aye. voted aye. Councilmember Fonnesbeck Councilmember Hardman moved moved and Councilmember Kirk and Councilmember Bittner seconded seconded to appropriate $100,000 to decrease the risk management of central fire dispatch fund internal service fund by $20, 000 balance to transfers to the gen- to reflect the elimination of the eral fund, which motion carried, Section 89 consulting fees, which all members voted aye. motion carried, all members voted aye except Councilmember Fonnes- beck who voted nay. 89-173 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITF, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 Parks and Recreation that the capital improvement pro- gram, Main Street drainage im- Councilmember Hardman moved provement project, between South and Councilmember Horrocks second Temple and 300 South be increased to decrease the parks department by $20,000 to be funded from personal services by $10, 603 Redevelopment Agency tax increment reflecting a delay in hiring of funds, which motion carried, all the recreation manager for three members voted aye. months, which motion carried, all members voted aye. Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Hardman Hardman - seconded Public Works that the capital improvement pro- gram, Fire Station #10 construc- Councilmember Hardman moved tion project, be reduced by $450, - and Councilmember Kirk seconded to 000; with the funds transferred to increase the public works depart- CIP contingency and designated for ment budget by $277, 586 for the Sunnyside Recreation Center, which restoration of the neighborhood motion carried, all members voted trash pickup, which motion car- aye. Tied, all members voted aye. Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Hardman moved Councilmember Hardman seconded and Councilmember Bittner seconded that the capital improvement pro- to decrease the public works de- gram, Sunnyside Recreation Center partment travel/training budget by project, be decreased by $100,000; $3, 109, which motion carried, all with the funds transferred to CIP members voted aye. contingency and designated for Sunnyside Recreation Center, which Capital Improvement Program motion carried, all members voted aye. Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Horrocks seconded Councilmember Kirk moved and that the capital improvement pro- Councilmember Fonnesbeck seconded gram budget be increased by $430, - that the capital improvement pro- 000 for the California Avenue gram contingency be increased by project to reflect an increase in $63, 532 and designated for the property owner assessments, which Sunnyside Recreation Center engi- motion carried, all members voted neering fees. No vote was taken aye. because Councilmember Hardman made a substitute motion. Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Bittner seconded Councilmember Hardman moved that the capital improvement pro- and Councilmember Bittner seconded gram, central business district to make a substitute motion, which beautification projects, be in- motion carried, Councilmembers creased by $420, 000 to be funded Bittner, Horrocks, Hardman and $210,000 from Redevelopment Agency Stoler voted aye, and Council- tax increment funds and $210,000 members Fonnesbeck, Godfrey and from property owner assessments, Kirk voted nay. which motion carried, all members voted aye. Councilmember Hardman moved and Councilmember Bittner seconded Councilmember Kirk moved and to increase the governmental im- Councilmember Horrocks seconded munity internal service fund 89-174 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI14', UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 contingency by $63, 532, which Miscellaneous motion carried, Councilmembers Bittner, Horrocks, Hardman and Councilmember Stoler moved Stoler voted aye, and Council- and Councilmember Hardman seconded members Fonnesbeck, Godfrey and to increase general fund transfers Kirk voted nay. to the governmental immunity fund by $63, 532, which motion carried, Councilmember Hardman moved Councilmembers Bittner, Horrocks, and Councilmember Horrocks sec- Hardman and Stoler voted aye, and onded that the capital improvement Councilmembers Fonnesbeck, Godfrey program, Fire Station #10 con- and Kirk voted nay. struction project, be decreased by $70, 000; with the funds trans- Councilmember Stoler moved ferred to CIP contingency and des- and Councilmember Hardman seconded ignated as Sunnyside Recreation to decrease the general fund Center engineering fees, which contingency by $9, 569, which motion carried, Councilmembers motion carried, all members voted Bittner, Horrocks, Hardman and aye except Councilmember Stoler voted aye, and Council- Fonnesbeck who voted nay. members Fonnesbeck, Godfrey and Kirk voted nay. Adopting Budget Non-Departmental Councilmember Stoler moved and Councilmember Bittner seconded Councilmember Kirk moved and to approve the 1989-90 general Councilmember Hardman seconded to fund budget totaling $82, 682,395 decrease transfers to the fleet and all other budgets as presented maintenance internal service fund by the Mayor and altered by Coun- by $155, 000, which motion carried, cil motion; and adopt Ordinance 36 all members voted aye. of 1989 adopting budgets of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the Councilmember Kirk moved and library fund budget totaling Councilmember Hardman seconded to $6,039, 425, for the fiscal year increase the municipal affairs beginning July 1, 1989, and ending budget by $10, 000 to reflect an June 30, 1990, which motion car- increase in Utah League of Cities ried, all members voted aye. and Towns dues, which motion carried, all members voted aye. DISCUSSION: Golf Course Fund: Councilmember Kirk said she Councilmember Kirk moved and understood that by eliminating .35 Councilmember Hardman seconded to FTE seasonal golf marshal the city increase transfers to the demo- would still have one seasonal golf lition fund by $5, 000, which marshal. John Gust, director of motion carried, all members voted parks, said yes. Lee King, Coun- aye. cil Staff, said during the budget discussions, the Council through Library their straw polls elimi-nated one golf course marshal and two Councilmember Bittner moved grounds keepers. He said the and Councilmember Horrocks sec- Council ' s intent during discus- onded to increase the library fund sions was that the remaining golf contingency by $35, 630, which course marshal would ride in one motion carried, all members voted of the existing golf carts pending aye. 89-175 PROCEEINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 a study to determine whether or shal. Mayor DePaulis said he not the program would be viable. agreed with Councilmember Stoler to keep the positions funded. Councilmember Stoler asked the Council to reconsider elimi- Capital Improvement Program: nating the grounds keepers since Councilmember Bittner asked if the the perimeters of city golf cours- $50,000 for Riverside Park was in es looked unkempt. He said he place. Mayor DePaulis said he had thought it was shortsighted to not signed the requisition form that keep the perimeters of the golf would place the $50, 000 into the course lookingnice, especially at CIP for that project. the airport. Councilmember Kirk asked Councilmember Bittner said Councilmember Hardman for clari- one thing the golfers talked about fication of his motion to increase was the need for marshals and had the governmental immunity internal suggested that one was not enough. service fund contingency by $63, - She said the golfers seemed to be 532 as a substitute for her motion willing to pay the costs. Coun- to increase the capital improve- cilmember Kirk said she spent ment program contingency by $63, - three hours with golfers and it 532 to be designated for the seemed to her that they wanted Sunnyside Recreation Center engi- additional services but didn't neering fees. Councilmember want fee increases. Councilmember Hardman said he proposed that the Fonnesbeck said moving the $20, 726 $70,000 engineering fees for did not impact the fees because Sunnyside come from the Fire the Council was moving it into Station #10 project. He explained contingency. that in the Mayor' s budget last year, the Mayor proposed $500,000 In response to golf course for governmental immunity but appearance, Mr. Gust said that ended up borrowing $200, 000 from from tee to green that city had the fund to make up a deficit. He the finest golf courses and had said at that time the Council proposed to do landscaping on the discussed moving surplus funds exteriors. He said it would be into the governmental immunity beneficial for a minimal cost to fund. keep the grounds keepers. He said they would only be on payroll from Councilmember Kirk said she April 1 through October 1 and was also concerned about the said the positions were strictly governmental immunity fund but seasonal and would only be used said if they took $70, 000 from the for landscaping. He also said the fire station they would have that public wanted the marshals. much more to make up next year. She was concerned because the Councilmember Hardman asked Council was already taking 2/3 of if there would be $20,000 left for the funding for Fire Station #10. one golf marshal. Councilmember Stoler said if the Council didn't Councilmember Bittner said moved and $20, 726 to contingency the Council' s commitment to the the city would have two marshals Sunnyside Recreation Center was and two grounds keepers. Mr. King $700, 000 not $770, 000. She was said moving the funds would elimi- concerned about appropriating an nate one marshal and two grounds additional $70, 000 and said she keepers and would leave one mar- thought there were too many hidden 89-176 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIT!, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 costs with the recreation center. Godfrey asked if this rate was higher or lower than the current Roger Cutler, city attorney, rate. Buzz Hunt, city treasurer, said the governmental immunity said the new rate would be lower fund was operating at a close than the current rate and said level but wanted the Council to people would see a . 5% tax de- understand that once funds were crease. appropriated to governmental im- munity it was an encumbered ac- Councilmember Hardman asked count and the Council couldn't why there would be a tax decrease. take the money out for general Mr. Hunt explained that the city fund purposes. was limited to a certified tax rate, which was the tax rate the Councilmember Kirk was con- city could impose to generate the cerned that the people who worked same amount of revenue this year on the fire station committee as last year excluding new growth. would wonder about the city' s He said during the current fiscal commitment to the project. year, the city experienced an Councilmember Hardman said his increase in their collection rate commitment was as strong as it had so this year they didn' t have to ever been. set such a high tax rate to gener- ate the same amount of revenue. Councilmember Hardman asked (0 89-23) if the entire $70, 000 would be used for Sunnyside Recreation #15. RE: Legislative intents Center engineering fees. Cindy relating to the Fiscal Year 1989- Gust-Jenson said $56,000 would be 90 budgets. for salaries and the remainder would be used for inspection and ACTION: Councilmember Bittner testing so the total cost would be moved and Councilmember Horrocks $70,000. seconded to adopt an intent of the (B 89-5) City Council that the administra- tion formalize a coordinated plan #14. RE: An ordinance de- for the joint economic development termining the rate of tax levy and of the Northwest Quadrant and the levying taxes upon all real and airport. That plan should define personal property within Salt Lake the role of the airport in the City, Utah, made taxable by law process, address needed improve- for the fiscal year commencing ments in the Northwest Quadrant July 1, 1989, and ending June 30, and should accommodate the exten- 1990. sion of California Avenue all the way to 5600 West, with the eventu- ACTION: Councilmember Stoler al goal of connecting into the moved and Councilmember Bittner West Valley Highway, which motion seconded to adopt Ordinance 37 of carried, all members voted aye. 1989 establishing the tax rate for the general fund at .004360 and Councilmember Hardman moved the library fund at .000867 for and Councilmember Kirk seconded to the fiscal year beginning July 1, adopt an intent of the City Coun- 1989, and ending June 30, 1990, cil that the administration con- which motion carried, all members duct a vehicle utilization study voted aye. to determine if the number of vehicles in each department is DISCUSSION: Councilmember fully justified, which motion 89-177 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 carried, all members voted aye. with funding to come from the Council ' s auditing budget, which Councilmember Horrocks moved motion carried, all members voted and Councilmember Kirk seconded to aye. adopt an intent of the City Coun- cil that the administration work Councilmember Bittner moved with the Sugar House Park Authori- and Councilmember Hardman seconded ty to increase the public usage of to adopt an intent of the City the park through promotion of Council that the administration additional outdoor events. It is develop a policy discouraging the also the Council ' s intent that hiring of personnel on a contrac- maintenance costs be reviewed to tual basis beyond an 11 month ensure that funds budgeted for the period, which motion carried, all Sugar House Park Authority are members voted aye except Council- used in the most efficient manner, members Fonnesbeck and Godfrey who which motion carried, all members voted nay. voted aye. Councilmember Bittner moved Councilmember Horrocks moved and Councilmember Horrocks second- and Councilmember Bittner seconded ed to adopt an intent of the City to adopt an intent of the City Council that the administration Council that the parks department review with the Salt Lake City study the policy of charging Board of Education the process for sports leagues for maintenance of approving requests for school baseball and soccer fields, with crossing guards, which motion approval of the Council prior to carried, all members voted aye. the implementation of the policy, which motion carried, all members Councilmember Stoler moved voted aye. and Councilmember Hardman seconded to adopt an intent of the City Councilmember Horrocks moved Council that the administration and Councilmember Kirk seconded to review the school crossing guard adopt an intent of the City Coun- program with regard to salaries cil that the administration begin and benefits and report to the negotiations with Salt Lake County Council, which motion carried, all to effectuate reimbursement for members voted aye. city property owners paying prop- erty taxes for emergency medical Councilmember Kirk moved and services to the county while Councilmember Hardman seconded to receiving the same service from adopt an intent of the City Coun- the city. It is the further cil that the administration in- intent of the City Council that clude in the Fiscal Year 1990-91 the fire department complete a capital improvements budget fund- study of the feasibility of estab- ing for the completion of the lishing user fees for paramedic construction of Fire Station #10, services, which motion carried, which motion carried, all members all members voted aye. voted aye. Councilmember Horrocks moved Councilmember Hardman moved and Councilmember Kirk seconded to and Councilmember Bittner seconded adopt an intent of the City Coun- to adopt an intent of the City cil that a study be conducted to Council that any slippage from evaluate the fire department' s prior year CDBG projects which consolidated dispatch operations, becomes available during 1989-90 89-178 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITE, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 be applied towards the Community Council asked the Administration Development Corporation and that to negotiate with the school capital planning report at least district to share the costs. He semiannually on the availability said they were not interested in of slippage, which motion carried, sharing the costs and said the all members voted aye. trend across the country was for municipalities to pay for school Councilmember Hardman moved guards. He said this new intent and Councilmember Stoler seconded was different in that the Council to adopt an intent of the City was asking the Administration to Council that the administration review the process of determining evaluate the potential cost sav- where school crossing guards would ings of privitizing the neighbor- go. hood trash pickup program while maintaining the current level of Councilmember Fonnesbeck service, which motion carried, all asked if this intent was suggest- members voted aye. ing that the board get involved where they now were not. Mr. Councilmember Hardman moved Zuhl said the school district and Councilmember Bittner seconded maintained that this was a public to adopt an intent of the City safety issue and not an education- Council that a quarterly report of al issue. Councilmember the status of the legislative Fonnesbeck asked about the benefit intent statements be provided by of involving the school board. the administration, which motion carried, all members voted aye. Councilmember Godfrey asked if currently criteria were used to DISCUSSION: In reference to determine where crossing guards the Council intent discouraging should be allocated. Council- hiring personnel on a contractual member Stoler said yes but there basis beyond 11 months, was also pressure applied if the Councilmember Bittner said it traffic situation changed and a would not be convenient and easy street suddenly became busy. for departments to justify an additional FTE and she wanted the Councilmember Bittner said Council to keep the prerogative to her concern was that there was no review FTEs. review process. She wanted the administration to talk to the Regarding the intent to Board of Education so standards review the process for approving and criteria could be developed. school crossing guards, Councilmember Fonnesbeck asked why Councilmember Bittner said that the city should approach the the Board of Education requested board. Councilmember Bittner school guards at locations and she suggested that a policy be devel- wasn' t aware of any review pro- oped jointly since this was a cess. Councilmember Stoler said school-generated problem. the board wasn' t involved in the process since the requests came Mayor DePaulis said regard- through the schools via the PTA. less of the criteria, it was difficult to tell a group of Councilmember Godfrey asked parents they couldn't have a if the Council approved a similar crossing guard. Councilmember intent last year. Mike Zuhl, Hardman said involving the school Chief of Staff, said last year the board would make them aware of the 89-179 PROCE•INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 number of requests the city re- ceived and perhaps they could help minimize the impact. Councilmember Fonnesbeck suggested that the city could achieve this by only accepting requests through the school board. Mayor DePaulis thought the school board could help control the program if they were involved. (B 89-5) The meeting adj rn d at 9:00 p.m. id / f V COU I CHAIR rC TY Rf D 89-180 SALT LAKE CITY t OUNCIL AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER CITY & COUNTY BUILDING, 315 451 SOUTH STATE STREET Tuesday, June 13, 1989 6:00 p.m. A. BRIEFING SESSION: 5:00 - 5:55 p.m. , City & County Building, 325. 1. Report of the Executive Director. B. OPENING CEREMONIES: 1. Invocation. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Approval of the Minutes. C. COMMENTS: 1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2. Citizen Comments to the Council. D. CONSENT: 1. Central Business Improvement District - Board Appointment. Consider approving the appointment of James Stewart to the Central Business Improvement District Board of Directors. ( I 89-11 ) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve. 2. Petition No. 400-731 - Clark Development. Set a date for a public hearing to be held Tuesday, July 11, 1989, at 6:40 p.m. , to obtain public comment concerning Petition No. 400-731 submitted by Clark Development requesting the City rezone property located between Simpson Avenue and Interstate 80 and between Highland Drive and 1300 East Street from Residential "R-2" and Commercial "C-1" to a Commercial "C-3" classification. (P 89-176 ) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set date. 3. Petition No. 400-732 - Clark Development. Set a date for a public hearing to be held Tuesday, July 18, 1989, at 6: 50 p.m. , to obtain public comment concerning Petition No. 400-732 submitted by Clark Development requesting the City vacate public streets and alleys in the area located between Simpson Avenue and Interstate 80 and between Highland Drive and 1300 East Street. (P 89-177) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set date. D. CONSENT Cont 4. Petition No. 400-668 - Club DejaVu. Set a date for a public hearing to be held Tuesday, =.lg, J98 t 6: 20 p.m. , to obtain public comment concerning Petition No. 400-668 submitted by Club DejaVu requesting the City change the license ordinance concerning location restrictions for Class B Private Clubs.' (P 89-173) Or ��^5 On G UI 1 V STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set date. �u c P 5. Petition No. 400-710 - Thelma and Gilbert Iker. Set a date for a public hearing to be held Tuesday, July 18, 1989 at 6:30 p.m. , to obtain public comment concerning Petition No. 400 ubmitted by Gilbert and Thelma Iker requesting the City rezone a portion of their property at 1307 South 900 West from Residential "R-2" to a Business "B-3" classification. (P 89-174) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set date. 6. Petition No. 400-669 - William and Mary Ann DeNiro. Set a date for a public hearing to be held Tuesday, July 18, 1989 at 6:40 p.m. , to obtain public comment concerning Petition NO. 400-669 submitted by William and Mary Ann DeNiro requesting the City rezone property located at 360-366 South 900 West from a Residential "R-6" to a Business "B-3" classification. (P 89-175) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set date. E. NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS: 1. Stop Intersections Ordinance. Consider adopting an ordinance amending Title 12, Chapter 44, Section 210, Subparagraph A, of the Salt Lake City Code, 1988, relating to stop intersections, and re-lettering subsequent subparagraphs. briniiS 41 4-Dl S1 (0 89-27) an(Dri nee STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Refer to Consent. 5Ie_ F. UNFINISHED COUNCIL BUSINESS: _ ^r� J t5rith hG I- I I ru nc 0 M O1562.) ��. dC J Lf' III 1. Special Improvement District No. 40-R-13 - Non-Contiguous Streets. vr'm A3t0' Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the issuance and providing for 1 N0 T ` �I��(� the sale of Salt Lake City $650,000 Special Assessment Bonds, Series 1989, ��1 (��U Concrete Replacement Special Improvement District No. 40-R-13 (Non- `�� e� 1`�, Contiguous Streets) providing for the pricing and terms of the bonds, r1h prescribing the form of bonds, the maturity and denomination of said bonds; b � l� providing for the continuance of a guaranty fund; authorizing and approving Z the form of a bond purchase agreement and the official statement, and related matters. I (Q 87-3) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. F. UNFINISHED Cot IL BUSINESS Cont'd. 2. Special Improvement District No. 40-R-16 - Avenues Cross Drains. Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the issuance and providing for the sale of Salt Lake City $144,000 Special Assessment Bonds, Series 1989, Concrete Special Improvement District No. 40-R-16 (Avenues Cross Drain Project) providing for the pricing and terms of the bonds, prescribing the form of bonds, the maturity and denomination of said bonds; providing for the continuance of a guaranty fund; authorizing and approving the form of a bond purchase agreement and the official statement, and related matters. (0 88-2) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. 3. Special Improvement District No. 38-757 - 900 West Curb and Gutter. Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the issuance and providing for the sale of Salt Lake City $280,000 Special Assessment Bonds, Series 1989, 900 West Curb and Gutter Extension Special Improvement District No. 38-757 providing for the pricing and terms of the bonds, prescribing the form of bonds, the maturity and denomination of said bonds; providing for the continuance of a guaranty fund; authorizing and approving the form of a bond purchase agreement and the official statement, and related matters. (0 87-2) STAFF RECOIM7ENDATION: Adopt. 17e- 4. Tax Revenue Anticipation Notes. - 22 Caro( W ��I awarz ' d Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the issuance and confirming the sale of the $17,500,000 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1989, of Salt Lake City; providing for covenants to establish and maintain the excludability of interest on the notes from gross income of the holders thereof for federal income tax purposes; and related matters. b (0 89-4) +16L\ �- ) V1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. ( 5. Water and Sewer Rates. _soe moil il on si P-as(on-- 1-)(4 Consider adopting an ordinance amending Sections 17. 16.670 17.72.030 01 the Salt Lake City Code relating to Water and Sewer rates. W a 4, (0 89-16) (D STAFF RECOMMENDATION: .- "' A6I;1 i i G /1 orb). VA' 6. Tracy Aviary. Consider adopting an ordinance enacting Section 15.16.070 of the Salt Lake City Code providing for admission fees to Tracy Aviary. (0 89-17) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. 0 n or J F. UNFINISHED CC ;IL BUSINESS Cont"d. 7. Compensation Plan. Consider adopting an ordinance amending Section 2. 52.010 of the Salt Lake City Code, as last amended by Bill No. 44 of 1988 relating to compensation of Salt Lake City Corporation officers and employees, including statutory officers. (0 89-20) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. 8. Memorandum of Understanding, Salt Lake City Police Association. Consider adopting a resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake City Police Association. (C 89-310) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Table to July 11, 1989. 9. Memorandum of Understanding, International Firefighters Association - 1645. Consider adopting a resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters, Local 1645. (C 89-309) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Table to July 11, 1989. 10. Compensation Plan - 400 Series Employees. Consider adopting an ordinance amending Section 2. 52. 115 of the Salt Lake City Code relating to compensation and benefits for Salt Lake City Corporation 400 Series Employees. (0 89-21 ) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Table to July 11, 1989. 11. Memorandum of Understanding - AFSCME - 200 Series. Consider adopting a resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Local 1004 for Salt Lake City's 200 Series Employees. (C 89-308) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Table to July 11, 1989. 12. Compensation Plan - 100 Series Employees. Consider adopting a resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Local 1004 for Salt Lake City Corporation's 100 Series Employees. (C 89-307) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Table to July 11, 1989. F. UNFINISHED CC 'IL BUSINESS Cont"d. 13. Fiscal Year 1989-90 Budgets. Consider adopting an ordinance adopting final budgets of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the Library Fund budget, for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 1989, and ending June 30, 1990. (B 89-5) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. 14. Tax Levy Rates. Consider adopting an ordinance determining the rate of tax levy and levying taxes upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, Utah made taxable by law for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 1989, and ending June 30, 1990. (0 89-23) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. 15. Legislative Intents. Consider adopting legislative intents relating to the Fiscal Year 1989-90 budgets. (B 89-5) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. H. ADJOURNMENT. ** FINAL ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AND/OR ORDINANCES ADOPTED CONCERNING ANY ITEM ON THIS AGENDA DATED: June 9, 1989 BY: CITY C STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ss. On the 9th day of June, 1989, I personally delivered a copy of the foregoing notice to the Mayor and City Council and posted copies of the same in conspicuous view, at the following times and locations within the City & County Building, 451 South State Strcct, Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. At 5: 00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office, Room 415; and 2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom, Room 343. CITY ORD Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of June, 1989. //// J Notl4ry/`Public residing in the State f Utah My Casa iae ipoia-Frxf res -- ,�•:.:� LYNDA Notary Pubic DOMINO I • + ". City&County Eui{dw .t j; Salt Lake C ty 1Jtah 84111 `,++ ‘Tn;� My Commission Expiresa Mav 1,13 99 I / tth titato of Y L. - APPROVAL: 7 EXECUTI DIREC'IY� GENERAL FUND - ACROSS THE BOARD THIS MOTION REPLACES THE FIRST IN YOUR PACKET 6\-- uJ cKI move that we increase the General Fund Budget by $386,525 to reflect changes ,/ in personal services. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES: IMS V I move that we appropriate $5,179 from Information Management Services Internal Service fund balance to reflect changes in personal services. skiff! a_; f C„o,,� r, 119.lif OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, SUITE 304 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 535-7600 June 12, 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCIL MEMBERS 1 FROM: CINDY GUST-JENSON RE: SUNNYSIDE ENGINEERING FEES In response to questions from Council Members, City Engineer Max Peterson has provided the attached memo detailing how the $70,000 in engineering fees for the Sunnyside Recreation Center would be used. I discussed with Max the pros and cons of attempting to hire a City employee to do this, rather than a contract person, but he indicated that it is most efficient and economical at this point handle this through a contract because at this time it is difficult to find engineers who are available for City employment. Regarding the funding of the $70,000, following are options for your consideration: Utilize the $63,532 identified in increased revenues, and allocate the -- remaining $fITIDrom the Fire Station 10 money, with the intent that the Fire Station be fully funded next year. Allocate the full $70,000 from the Fire Station 10 money, with the intent that the Fire Station be fully funded next year. Utilize the $63,532 identified in increased revenues, and allocate the _ remaining $6,468 from the Parks Department special Capital Improvement fund. Allocate the full $70,000 from the Parks Department special Capital Improvement fund. The Parks Department indicates that they plan to use the Capital Improvement fund to renovate the Memorial House in Memory Grove. There is about $140,000 in the fund currently, and they estimate the renovation would cost more than $200,000. The Parks Department plans that when renovated, the facility could generate funds. The Parks Department indicates that this fund was established so that lease revenues could be used to fund improvements at either the facility that generates the revenue, or development or renovation of other parks and parks facilities. Any of the options listed above would meet the need for the engineering fees. The option of utilizing the $63,532 in increased revenues and allocating the $6,468 from the Fire Station 10 construction, with the intent to fully fund Fire Station 10 next year, appears to be the least disruptive. ' St SALT° .s a+ GI F (_OPPORAT-I:O N DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PALMER DEPAULIS City Engineering Division ; MAX G. PETERSON, P.E. MAYOR 444 SOUTH STATE STREET CITY ENGINEER SALT LAKE CITY. UTAH 84111 535-7871 June 12 , 1989 Cindy Gust Jensen , Executive Director City Council 3rd Floor , City Hall Re : Sunnyside Recreation Center Dear Ms . Jensen : Salt Lake City Engineering is responsible for the design and construction of City funded improvements . To accomplish this mission , Engineers and Technicians are assigned to administer construction contracts , review designs and inspect the construction activity to insure compliance with project specifications and drawings . On City Architectural Consultant contracts the architect provides construction documents to the City for constructing the project and then by contract , visits the site a minimum of once a week to observe construction activities . This consultant does not administer the City Construction Contract, inspect the daily construction activities of the contractor nor provide material testing services . These services are provided by City Engineering . The workload assigned City Engineering this year and available staff does not allow assigning a regular city employee to the Sunnyside project to serve as City Project Representative , i . e . Project Manager/Engineer/ Inspector during construction . Page 2 Cindy G . Jensen June 12 , 1989 City Engineering proposes to hire an Engineer on contract for the duration of the recreation project to provide this service . The $70 , 000 budget request will allow hiring a contract Engineer for one year . Specifically for the Sunnyside Facility the city project representative will do the following work : Owner Representation /Project Manager Coordination and direction of the various groups involved with the design , permitting , funding and construction of the project. Observation and daily inspection of construction activities of both the pool and building contractor to insure compliance with drawings and specifications . Administration of contracts , contract changes , disputes , changed conditions and pay requests . Maintain thorough documentation of all construction activities . Budget Control Budget controls of the multiple contracts for this project will be reasonably complicated , requiring ongoing supervision including coordination and tracking of costs originating from the design consultants , soils and civil engineers , building and pool contractors . Limiting change orders and design omissions will be accomplished with ongoing monitoring . Scheduling Maintain momentum through both the design and construction period to assure a timely completion . Both design and construction are constrained by the short period for design and late fall construction start and an opening set for Memorial Day 1990 . Scope Insure that each of the contracts are being fulfilled in accordance with their contract documents . The contract project manager will also be working on the siting and design of Fire Station # 10 to allow construction to start in the spring 1990 . It is anticipated the project managers time would be split 80% going to the recreation center and 20% to Fire Station #10 . The cost to the recreation center would therefore be $ 56 , 000. Page 3 Cindy G< Jensen June 12 , 1989 The remaining $ 14 , 000 of the $70 , 000 budget request for the recreation center would allow reimbursement of Engineering fees for Administrative costs , concrete testing , asphalt paving testing , soil compaction tests and drainage and site development reviews . The ongoing close supervision and management will help insure the successful completion of the Recreation Center . The tight schedule requring winter construction and budget bring the need for increased attention and project management. Sincerely , ax1G rson, P . E. City Engineer MGP : po cc : Joseph Anderson Gaylord Smith Dick Young Vault Scott Bond • !flateg111-�..�o l,L 1 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ROSEMARY DAVIS Capital Planning and Programming DIRECTOR CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUH STATE STREET, SUITE 404 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 535-7902 June 12, 1989 TO: Honorable Palmer A. DePaul 1/4/ (pf12 Mayor ,-, FROM: Rosemary Davis, D,i ector Capital Planning and Programming RE: Community Development Request for $7,500 to Transport Donated Plants from California Background: Ken Eltinge of the Sugarhouse Council has arranged a donation of 30, 000 plantings from a California nursery. Discussion: A preliminary proposal was presented to the Capital Planning office on June 12, for $7,500 to pay for transporting the plants . Though the proposal has merit, the following problems exist. 1 . This is a "new" Community Development proposal and has not gone through the regular process . 2 . The CDAC Committee was polled by one of its members by phone, and not the Chair. 3 . The proposal is incomplete without documentation of who will care for the plants before they are planted, where they will be planted, who will plant and then care for them. These are all normal questions that are cleared up during the regular Community Development process . Though the proposal was discussed with us earlier, we could not start the process with CDAC or do our regular review without the application being submitted. Recommendation: If these issues can be resolved and Salt Lake City can be the recipient of this large of a donation, the proposal should be approved contingent to their resolution. FCR DICE USE QII,Y Standard Name and ID # Cr: LOG NO. Total CDBG Funds Requested $ SALT LAKE CITY CC:IMMUNITY DEVEwpNENr FLOCK GRANT • STANDARD PROPOSAL FIRM Iy t43.6th-YEAR PROGRAM rtRY 1, 1990-- If more space is required to answer any of the following questions, please attach additional pages. 1. Project Title and Proposed Location: ;<XX;A/(7_ /A.,r),c CO%f/Alw /7 ( )_/:Vci( Pi-4 / C7_ 2. Requesting Organization or Individual.: SG'lA,e Ala G-s-,C c"D,w Wcidvi rj 3. Project Description: What the project will do, why it is needed, how it will work, and the specific people who will benefit from the project being done. Sv/'f'ey et/4-.-s ,'1Nt.) SilRcJBS Fc2 S'. C. �.. S�'li�2 C 'rs /�/ !',- r'�^2 PG,tivr/N6 s /I,cv,kr 4.41-7- S L . L•. 5 KE,4ties BaM',f•:J /N P 4.NT/A% l N PA/ .,CS A.vp 9PF,Y SPACE PLAINTS A'v/) S/4,e. s AIA7 45E/ !G PO Y47-7F0 To Su ,a,e GC.1-S-/E f� 't A/A rOJ P44,vrs lAtc, 'S S•u,v c,rr c,.1 . NURs,f,cy. Sude64,,eitouSE MU Si Pi4-y• 77/E CAST ate iA' d s/7a,e-1-,4774,v 'IN0 WA-/D/NG VAIC(IX a,c Do•v4.710,u 71, _ u c) 4. Total amount required to ctvlplete the project or operate the program, including Ca►munity Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds 1999-$6 $ .7 S o = 5. Arrount of CDBG funds requested 1990- $ 6. Sources and Amounts of other funds for this project (either being applied for or obtained): 11 'tilTA/N f=U6[ -SUP/' SA Lr y CCvVrr $ C/4-L VF/ C0/v77NCEm cY 4uoc r) . 7. Project Plan: Briefly describe how you plan to accvnplish the project. What are the expected products or results of the project? For example, the number of houses to be rehabilitated, number of blocks or linear feet of street iits, and/or number of persons benefiting. If you are working with property, a lot, street or a building, you may wish to include photographs, drawings or a sketch of your project. 3 co,crazy f &'/7Ts 2 A P4r ,o To ,a,f vrlea 70 4 c r TH 6 /'44 t,rc t. cc R/E s 7a,eri /WT (.C/V /'ls-/JaC s TATE 6.,NUIThL. PC Lea. Al U,es •A. ,a,vp u- xc • per.3c, 0POW s/,a firryl 0 j crs A1- WA- v//eFc r/cr,v o -;: X.4 c.rO ', to,trn u Az(ry Coa v 'L , ,6t- ,d P0N,.1 &vie C_ F7/6f -frrc-r-C / N irior oz. LO/tl u,t//Tj' , G A, W ZYs (A,e/<S , N v-.V 873S/NS //(c.cs,. CCTV S "/1VAro a,,,73 07714" &1c3,74 wIf (4.E f,QQ1Ec7---C Al RE 4-fa-ea , A/0 /J ,v , i- at � /c cr 4' dA( (va, /9/20 Psi\Tf/ 8. If your project will involve any future maintenance or operating costs, please submit the following information: Maintenance Required: t..0,47 /? //V(_ 6 s'An,e,C f'Gld Air/A/6. Estimated annual cost: Who will do it? Lr/, t; T'r,di< A/()Rs/iRy C,ts'oA/ name of person or agency 7/- 0 address phone Who will pay for it? $',-,;,y (7 F U 7A..// 9. Proposed starting date: /i3 Ptvposed calVletion date: Please describe any seasonal factors which will affect the starting or uu►Vletion of the project. A/;� 10. Line Item Budget Breakdown tor CDBG Funds Requested: CMG Salaries (identify employee) % of time salary amount 1. $ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Supplies or Materials (ie. stationary, duplication, postage, etc.) List each category and amount: 1. $ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Other Expenses . 1. :•6nITieAC_r- L-,g (iC/ ° ) $ :L.So 0 2- 7RAJvs Trn,4 CrrAt i S.Ca C 0 • 3. 4. 0 11 GkIT/ivfvFMGY /CJ`24. 7 S c+ 5. 6. 11. If your project involves any future maintenance or operating costs, please suhnit the following information: Maintenance required p- ,i,v7— /I( 7'ANiFc� , ' UA,2 i l'5' D5flrc _ Estimated annual cost- Who will do it? ,e/ve;- :, /A _ I2 J07 name of person or agency address phone Who will pay for it? SAE r., Q. �, W( G..�® VYr`JM OFFICE OF .THE CITY COUNCIL `SUITE 300. CITY HALL` 324 SOUTH STATE STREET T SALLAKE CITY;UTAH 84111 535-7600 June 12, 1989 MEMORANDUM• TO: COUNCIL MEMBERS ^'(� FROM: CINDY GUST-JENSONC�� RE: CDBG REQUEST -- PLANT PURCHASE • The Council has been asked to consider funding, through CDBG slippage, $7, 500 in transportation costs for plants that a company is willing to donate to the City. The company is apparently going out of business. This has been added as an addendum to your Tuesday agenda at the request of a Council Member. This appears to be a good opportunity for the City to get 20, 000 to 30,000 plants -for a very good price. The plants would be planted in public spaces. Capital Planning is doing additional research on this to ensure that all of the bases are covered, including care of the plants between arrival and planting, distribution of the plants, etc. HUD has indicated that it is an eligible cost. We do not have specific written information as of today, but we have been asked to place this on the agenda because of the time factor related to ' the transporting of the plants. We will have additional information for you on Tuesday evening. June 12, 1989 Council Members, Attached is an additional copy of the draft motions, a draft ordinance relating to the Public Utilities abatement, and the 300 and 400 series compensation plans. Regarding the motions, pages 9 and 10 have been altered slightly, based upon questions raised by Council Members relating to the CIP and Sunnyside Recreation. We hope the new information provided is clear. Also- enclosed in this packet is a new draft of the Public Utilities ordinance, which provides for the abatement you discussed. - The ordinance lists the abatement as 60 cents. We will prepare for your convenience a motion to amend the ordinance to give a one dollar-abatement, since this option was also discussed at your Committee of the Whole meeting last week. A memo outlining the impact of the abatement at each level is included in the regular Council packet you received last Friday for this Tuesday night. The Administration 'has forwarded the300 series comp. plan to you, and this can be adopted on Tuesday night.- e 400 series plan does not include a salary schedule. We do not know ether the Administration may ask you to /`�'` / meet on Thursday night to con . r the 0 series plan and the other plans '\j related to union negotiat,tons. We realize t some of the Council Members do ,. have conflicting schOu' es on Thursday night, we will make every effort to 1 ` schedule around these, if the request is made that you meet Thursday night. II l� Please give any of us a call tonight or on Tuesday if we can assist1 '�U ' you in gathering more information or preparing more motions. Thanks, • (1,\A Cindy (-2 r: 1 f: SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1989 (Water and sewer rates) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 17.16. 670, 17.16. 680 AND 17.72.030 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO WATER AND SEWER RATES. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That Table 17. 16. 670 of Section 17. 16. 670 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to minimum charges, be, and the same hereby is amended as follows: Table 17.16.670 • [Inside of Outside of • 3/4" & 1" $5.70 $11.40 1- 16 . 5-5 33. 10- 23.5-5 47. 10 2" 2-4. 8-6 49.7-0 34.85 69-7-7-0 75.00 150.00 100.00 200.00 6" 163. 75 327. 5-0 234.75 469 .50 3-50.53 701. 10 10" 34-8 . 20 6-9-6.40 49-9 .20 998.4G] • Inside of Inside of Outside of Outside of City City City City Connection Monthly Bimonthly Monthly Bimonthly 3/4" & 1" $6. 70 $13.40 $9.20 $18.40 1 1/2" 19 .30 38. 60 26.25 52. 50 2" 29 . 10 58.20 39 .10 78 .20 3" 58 . 50 117.00 79.50 159 .00 4" 90. 20 180.40 131 .20 262 .40 6" 192 . 55 385. 10 263. 50 527 .00 8" 287.30 574. 60 393.30 786 . 60 10" 409 . 20 818.40 560.20 1, 120.40 SECTION 2. That Section 17. 16. 680 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to meter rates, be, and the same hereby is amended as follows: 17.16.680 Meter rates. The rates for water supplied through meters to all places, after the minimum charges for the first one thousand cubic feet of water specified in Section 17 . 16. 670, or its successor, will be as follows: A. Inside the corporate limits of the city, [thirty eight] forty two cents per one hundred- cubic feet of water served through each service connection; B. Outside the corporate limits of the city, [fifty six] sixty two cents per one hundred cubic feet of water served through each service connection. C. Those owners, each year, granted abatement for taxes on their dwelling by, Salt Lake County under Section 59-2-1106 through 1108, Utah Code Annotated, or their successors, shall be granted a sixty cent ( 60C) abatement of the minimum monthly charge under Section 17. 16. 670 hereof or its successor. SECTION 3. That subsections 3 and 5 of Section 17.72.030, of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to Schedule 3 - rates and fees, be, and the same hereby is amended as follows: -2- 3. Sewer Charge. Each sewer service account shall be charged $3. 15 per month minimum charge or [$.85] $.80 per 100 cubic feet of the average monthly water meter readings of those using solely city water during the consecutive months of November, December, January, February and March each year, hereafter "winter readings, " whichever is higher. Said winter readings shall be the basis for sewer billings for the period July 1st through June 30th following such winter readings. Any user who had more than one water meter, one or more of which measures water eventually discharged ,into the sewer, and one or more other meters measuring water not entering the sewer, will be charged [$. 85] $. 80 per 100 cubic feet for all water used which may enter the sewer, but will not be assessed a sewer charge on water meter(s ) which measure water no part of which flows into the sewer system. For those not using city water or using some city water, the city may require a city-approved meter, at the sewer user' s expense, on the well(s) or other source( s ) of water supply, for measurement by city during said months to determine the sewer user' s water use during said months, the average of which shall become the basis for sewer billings for said period. For each single dwelling unit not using city water and desiring not to install a water meter as required above, the -3- director of the department of public utilities may waive the meter requirement, in which event the user will be charged for sewer service as provided in Subparagraph ( 5 ) (a) hereof. * * * 5. New Sewer Connections or Change in Occupancy. Any new sewer service or existing sewer having changed occupants (applies only to one to three dwelling units) or those which do not have sufficient or accurate data to establish said monthly winter reading, sewer rate shall be assessed monthly charges as follows until such data is available: (a) For each single dwelling unit, [$6.80] $6.40 per month. (b) For each duplex, [$6. 80] $6.40 per month, per dwelling unit. (c) Fore each triplex, [$6. 80] $6.40 per month, per dwelling unit. (d) For each multiple dwelling, a minimum monthly charge of [$6 . 80] $6 . 40 per dwelling unit or [$. 53] $ . 50 per 100 cubic feet of total water consumption, whichever is highest. (e) For all other users, a minimum charge of [$6. 80] $6.40 per month or [$ . 53] $. 50 per 100 cubic feet of total water consumption, whichever is highest. SECTION 4 . This ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. -4- Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989 . CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER RLM:cc • -5- :IA`SIAE tj atl4T 0,,� P6 KAREN SUZUKI-HASHIMOTO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR 451 SOUTH STATE STREET. ROOM 404 PALMER DEPAULIS SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 MAYOR PROGRAM ADMINISTRATORS: (801) 535-7844 PATRICIA CAMPBELL, C.G.P. FRANK FRASER JANE ERICKSON, A.R.M. TO: Willie Stoler , Chairperson Salt Lake City Council FROM: Karen Suzuki-Hashimot ector Department of Human es rce Management & Administrative Services DATE: June 12 , 1989 SUBJECT: Executive Summary - Salt Lake City Corporation Compensation Plan Enclosed please find the appropriate number of copies of a document titled "Compensation Plan for Salt Lake City Corporation Employees" . This plan covers those employees classified in the executive and 300 series pay scales . The proposed compensation plan before you differs from the one that is currently in effect in the following areas : Wording has been added to more clearly define such items as city seniority, the use of funeral leave when the funeral is greater than 150 miles away from Salt Lake City, and limiting "bumping" during a layoff situation by more narrowly defining the types of positions a laid off employee may assume. All of these clarifications makes this compensation plan consistent with the wording contained in the AFSCME contracts . The section previously titled parental leave has been changed to "dependent leave" . The revised wording in this section now reflects the wording within the contracts . This compensation plan provides Fire Department managerial employees of the combat division a one time reimbursement of $200 . 00 (upon receipt of proof of purchase) for new uniforms as specified in Fire Department Policy. The paragraph covering military pay for employees whileon annual encampment has been modified so that the employee now receives the difference between their military pay and city pay. In the past these employees would receive full city pay as well as full military pay while on annual encampment . This change in wording was also negotiated into the contracts . The pay schedule for 300 series employees (reference Appendix B) represents a 3% cost of living increase. The plan also allows for merit increases to 300 series employees on their anniversary dates. Vacation and sick leave accrual and conversion charts for managerial employees of the Fire Department have been listed separately and according to shifts as opposed to days and hours . This minor modification is not an enhancement but is rather a method for the timekeepers to more accurately track the accrual and usage of these two leave times in the Fire Department . The section of the comp plan relating to sick leave conversion has had additional schedules added to reflect new wording in the 100 and 200 series contracts which provides sick leave conversion schedules for individuals working 8, 10 and 12-hour shifts . Appendix C of this compensation plan details the employee/city ' s shares of contributions to the retirement system. The retirement section has been changed to reflect the new Early Retirement Incentive Ordinance and IRS withholding requirements . Although there are other minor grammatical and definitional changes contained in this document, those listed above are the only amendments of a substantive nature. It should also be noted for your information that the executive salary schedule contains in Exhibit A of this plan has not been changed from the comp plan which is currently in existence. I trust this information will prove valuable to you in your review of this plan. Thank you for your time in this matter . KSH/nw Enc cc: Mayor DePaulis PALMER DEPAU LIS AL'r��a�Wiff � 0;k�I_,ojf MAYOR OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 12 June 1989 CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 535-7704 W.M. "Willie" Stoler, Chair Salt Lake City Council 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Chairman Stoler: This letter is to appraise the City Council regarding the current status of labor negotiations and of my recommendations relative to appropriate action necessary. • 100 & 200 Series " fickV7 _ • Status: We have reached tentative agreement with AFSCME. We are told that AFSCME plans to ratify the contracts on 18 June. Upon. ratification of the contract, it will be forwarded to the Council for its approval on 11 July with a retroactive date of 1 July 1989 to conform with the City' s budget year. Final draft is close to completion. 300 Series - itcdOp Status: The Compensation Plan is completed and will be forwarded to the Council on 12 June. A summary of the proposed plan is being prepared by Human Resources, and will be forwarded to your attention. 400 Series Status: We are still negotiating with the Fire Union. The • Union has indicated a desire to continue talks, but at this time, we do not know if an agreement can be reached. We may ask for a special meeting this week regarding the status of their contract. 500 Series Status: We have reached tentative agreement regarding economic issues. What remains are language changes. We anticipate ratification of the Police contract. Upon ratification, the contract will be forwarded to the Council for approval on 11 July 1989 . As in the AFSCME contracts, actions will be retroactive to 1 July 1989 . As you can see, we are very close in reaching closure with the City' s Unions. The prospects are favorable for all but one of the unions. I have elected not to submit ordinances for the 100, 200, 400, and 500 series employees. In the event the Fire Union does not accept the City's proposal, an Ordinance for the 400 Series employees will be presented on 11 July 1989 (retroactive to 1 July) . Sincerely, Wt14it- A)4 - Pa-(A.E. Palmer A. DePaulis Mayor PAD/k COMPENSATION PLAN FOR SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION EMPLOYEES I . EFFECTIVE DATE The provisions of this plan shall be effective, commencing July 1, 1989 except as it has been or may be amended from time to time by the City Council, by ordinance, or upon approval of Memoranda of Understanding between the City and recognized employee bargaining units pursuant to the Third Amended Labor Bargaining Resolution passed by the City Council on April 10, 1984. II . ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES Eligible employees may be appointed, classified, and advanced under rules and regulations promulgated by the Mayor, within budget limi- tations established by the City Council. All elected officers and employees shall be eligible for and subject to the City compensa- tion plan with the following limiting provisions: A. Part-time, Seasonal, Contract and Hourly Employees Part-time, seasonal, and contract employees shall not be entitled to employment benefits in this plan. B. Adult School Crossing Guards Adult school crossing guards shall be eligible only for the insurance benefits contained in the plan. C. Volunteer Personnel and Personnel Appointed to Serve Without Pay Volunteer personnel and personnel appointed to serve without pay shall not be covered by provisions of the plan. D. Members of Boards and Commissions Members of boards and commissions shall be subject to appli- cable sections of state statutes and city ordinances. Unless otherwise stated, members of boards and commissions shall not be covered by provisions of this plan. E. Employees covered under the Memoranda of Understanding Employees covered under the memoranda of understanding between Salt Lake City and a recognized employee bargaining unit, shall be subject to the applicable terms of their memoranda. Unless otherwise specifically stated, said employee shall not be covered by provisions of this plan. Compensation Plan: Page 2 F. Employees Covered by Separate Ordinance Employees covered by separate City Ordinances which may include employees in recognized employee bargaining units who have not entered into any memoranda of understanding shall not be covered by the provisions of this plan. III . WAGES AND SALARIES A. Executive Employees Eligible executive employees shall be paid within ranges under the schedule attached hereto as Appendix A. B. Professional/Managerial Employees Professional and managerial employees not otherwise provided for in the compensation program of the City shall be paid monthly salaries specified in the schedule attached hereto as Appendix B. During the term of this plan, employees shall be eligible for a merit increase on their anniversary date in accordance with the salary schedule provided in Appendix B. C. Elected Officials The annual compensation of elected officials shall be as follows : Mayor $50,000 Council Members 10,000 D. Adult School Crossing Guards Adult school guards employed by the City to assist school children in crossing streets shall receive compensation of $335.00 per month or $3.35 per hour for relief guards. E. Forms of Compensation • The foregoing shall not restrict the Mayor from distributing appropriated monies to employees of the City in the form of retirement contributions; making lump sum incentive payments to employees within per antrum pay limitations; or classifying and advancing eligible employees under rules and regulations promulgated by the Mayor . Compensation Plan: Page 3 IV. SENIORITY, PAY PREMIUMS, DIFFERENTIALS AND ALLOWANCES For purposes of this compensation plan "seniority" shall be defined as an employee ' s uninterrupted, regularly scheduled full time salaried employment with the City. An employee's earned seniority shall not be lost because of absence due to illness, authorized leaves of absence, or temporary layoffs not to exceed two years. In addition to compensation provided under Section III, eligible employees of the City shall receive the following benefits: A. Longevity Pay 1. All City Executives and sworn Executive and Professional employees in the Police and Fire departments shall not be eligible for longevity benefits, unless authorized by order of the Mayor . The longevity benefit for these employees has been previously included within base pay. 2. All other eligible employees of the City who have completed six (6) consecutive full years of employment with the City, shall receive a monthly longevity benefit in the sum of $50 .00 per month. Said benefit shall be $75. 00 per month for employees who have completed ten (10) consecutive full years of employment with the City. Said benefit shall be $100.00 per month for employees who have completed sixteen (16) full years of employment with the City. The computation of longevity pay shall be based on the most recent date the person became a full time salaried employee. B. Overtime Compensation Eligible employees who are authorized and required by their supervisors to perform City work on an overtime basis shall be compensated by pay or compensatory time off under rates and procedures established by administrative order . The decision to award pay or compensatory time off shall be at the absolute discretion of the City subject to the limitations of the FLSA. In no case shall overtime compensation exceed the rate of 1- 1/2 times an employee's regular hourly rate of pay. C. Certification Incentive Pay The Mayor may adopt programs to promote employee education and training, provided that all compensation incentives under such - programs are authorized within appropriate budget limitations established by the City Council. Compensation Plan: Page 4 D. Other Allowances 1. Business Expenses The Mayor shall adopt rules and regulations for the authorization of employee advancement or reimbursement for actual expenses reasonably incurred in the performance of City business. Advancement or reimbursement shall be approved only for expenses documented and authorized in advance within budget limitations established by the City Council. 2 . Automobiles The Mayor may authorize under City policy an eligible em- ployee to utilize a City vehicle on a take-home basis, and may, as a condition of receipt, require eligible employees to reimburse the City for a portion of the take-home ve- hicle cost. All other officers and employees who are authorized to use and who do use privately-owned automobiles for official City business shall be reimbursed for the operation ex- penses of said automobiles at a rate established by City policy. A car allowance may be paid to department heads and other eligible employees at a-rate not to exceed $300 per month. Such payment shall be in lieu of any mileage allowance. The City shall provide, within budget limitations, for all persons who have not been assigned a parking place or are not provided parking, a $12.00 a month parking allowance. This shall be paid in $6.00 amounts on two biweekly paychecks each month. 3. Uniform Allowances Eligible employees shall be provided the following monthly uniform allowances when required to wear uniforms in the execution of their duties. Field Supervisor (Parking Enforcement) $40 .00 Non-sworn police merit level employees $40 .00 Sworn crime lab and evidence room technicians $50.00 Compensation Plan: Page 5 Uniform allowances are provided on the condition that eli- gible employees maintain their uniforms in reasonably good, clean, neat and pressed condition. Uniforms shall have proper identification and insignias and shall not be, frayed or unsightly. Uniforms shall be in full compliance with applicable department regulations. Failure to maintain apparel in accordance with the above shall be grounds for disciplinary action, including forfeiture of uniform allowances provided hereunder. Fire Department managerial employees of the combat division shall receive a one time payment of $200 .00 upon receipt of proof of purchase of new authorized uniforms as specified in department policy. Uniform Allowance for Police managerial personnel is included in base pay. 4. Call-Back, Stand-By and Meal Compensation Eligible employees shall receive call-back, stand- by and meal compensation pursuant to Salt Lake City Corporation Policy No. 4.01.800. V. LEAVES OF ABSENCE Eligible employees shall receive leaves of absence as provided in this section. The Mayor shall provide by order, rule and regula- tion, the specific terms and conditions upon which such leaves are to be made available to eligible employees. A. Holidays The following days shall be recognized and observed as holidays for all eligible employees. All such employees shall receive their regular rate of pay for each of the following unworked holidays. Part-time and seasonal employees shall not be entitled to holiday benefits: 1. The first day of January, called New Year ' s Day. 2. The third Monday of January, the anniversary of the birth of Martin Luther King. 3. The third Monday in February, observed as Presidents Day. 4. The last Monday of May, called Memorial Day. 5 . The fourth day of July, called Independence Day. 6. The twenty-fourth day of July, called Pioneer Day. Compensation Plan: Page 6 7 . The first Monday in September, known as Labor Day. * 8. The second Monday of October, known as Columbus Day. 9 . The eleventh day of November, known as Veteran' s Day. 10 . The fourth Thursday in November , known as Thanksgiving Day. 11 . The twenty-fifth day of December, called Christmas. 12. One personal holiday shall be taken upon request of the employee at the discretion of the supervisor . When any holiday listed above falls on Sunday, the following business day shall be considered a holiday. When any holiday listed above falls on a Saturday, the preceding business day shall be considered a holiday. In addition to the above, any day may be designated as a holiday by proclamation of the Mayor and/or City Council. No employee shall receive in excess of one day of holiday pay for a single holiday. All employees must work or be on autho- rized leave their last scheduled working hours before and the next scheduled working day following the holiday to qualify for holiday pay. * Columbus Day may be celebrated within 45 days following the date of its actual occurrence as specified in Section A above; provided, however , that an eligible employee may celebrate said Columbus Day on a day other than specified if a written request is approved in writing by the employee ' s supervisor , who shall have the sole and absolute discretion to approve any such request. B. Vacations Eligible employees shall be entitled to receive their regular salaries during vacation periods earned and taken in accordance with the provisions of this Article V. B. The election to accrue vacation pursuant either to the former vacation schedule (paragraph 4) or the vacation scheduled outlined in paragraph 3 is a one time election and cannot be changed by the employee at a later date. 1. Except as provided in Article V. B. 2 herein, employees shall accrue vacation under the _schedule in paragraph 3 of Article V. B; provided that no person shall be entitled to any vacation unless such person has successfully completed their initial probationary period. 2. Employees who became full time salaried employees before June 30, 1986, and who have elected to continue using the former vacation schedule shall accrue vacation under the schedule in paragraph 4 of this Article V. B. Compensation Plan: Page 7 3. Completed Years Days of Vacation Hours Accrued Shifts of Consecutive Per Year Per Biweekly per year City Service Pay Period combat Fire employees 0 to completion of 1 year 5 1 . 54 2 . 5 Beg . of 2nd yr . to completion of 3rd yr. 10 3 . 08 5 4 to 6 12 3.69 6 7 to 9 15 4 . 62 7 . 5 10 to 12 18 5. 54 9 13 to 15 20 6.15 10 16 to 19 22 6 .77 11 20 or more 25 7 .69 12 . 5 4 . For employees electing the former vacation schedule, they shall earn a vacation period of 3.69 hours per biweekly pay period from the date of full-time salaried employment; (6 on- duty shifts per calendar year of employment for combat fire employees) ; provided further, that no person shall be entitled to any vacation unless such person has successfully completed their probationary period of full-time salaried employment with the City. Eligible employees who have completed nine (9) consecutive full years of employment with the City shall earn a vacation equal to 5.23 hours per biweekly pay period; (8.5 on-duty shifts per calendar year of employment for combat fire employees) . Eligible employees who have completed fourteen ( 14) con- secutive years with the City shall earn a vacation equal to 6.77 hours per biweekly pay period; (11 on-duty shifts per full calendar year of employment for combat fire employees) . Combat fire employees shall accumulate vacation leave on an annual basis and shall be eligible to use such leave, commencing in the calendar year following accrual. Notwithstanding the above, Department Heads shall be eligible for twenty days vacation on January first of each of the first fourteen years of employment with the City and twenty-five days each January first thereafter. Eligible employees may accumulate vacations, ( including both accrued vacation and sick-leave conversion time) , according to the length of their full-time, consecutive years of employment with the City up to the following maximum limits: After 6 months Up to 25 days After 9 years Up to 30 days M Compensation Plan: Page 8 After 14 years Up to 35 days Department Heads Up to 40 days Any vacation accrued beyond said maximums shall be deemed forfeited unless utilized prior to the end of the calendar year in which the maximum has been accrued. Every employee whose employment is terminated by resignation or otherwise shall be entitled to be paid for: 1. All earned vacation time accrued, unused, and unforfeited as of the date of termination; and 2. In cases of permanent separation the City will compensate employees for unused compensatory time off . However , the provisions of Article V. 4. notwithstanding, no employee shall be entitled to any termination benefit or pay- ment for any vacation time which has not been vested, accrued, unforfeited and unused, and shall not be entitled to any payment or termination benefit: 1 . If an employee has not completed six (6) months of full- time employment with the City; or 2. If the resigning employee fails to give at least ten (10) days prior written-notice to the employee 's department head of the contemplated resignation. The City may purchase up to, but not exceeding two ( 2) weeks of earned and accrued vacation time, to which an eligible employee is entitled. Subject to the Mayor 's approval, the Director of the Department of Human Resource Management may establish by rules and regulations, the terms and conditions under which such purchases are to be permitted. C. Sick Leave Sick leave shall be provided for eligible employees only, as insurance against loss of income when an employee is unable to perform assigned duties because of illness or injury. The Mayor may establish rules and regulations for the correlation of sick leave and worker ' s compensation benefits. Employees covered by this plan shall be entitled to fifteen (15) days (120 hours) sick leave (7.5 on-duty shifts for eligible combat fire managerial employees) on January first of each calendar year or upon completion of their probationary period. The foregoing notwithstanding, no employee is entitled to sick leave until successfully completing the initial probationary period. Compensation Plan: Page 9 Authorized and unused sick leave may be accumulated from year to year subject to limitations of this plan. Any eligible employee who has accumulated thirty (30) sick leave days ( 240 hours) , or 15 shifts for eligible combat fire managerial employees, may choose to convert a portion of the yearly sick leave grant from any given year to vacation under the following schedule: For Employees Working Eight Hour Shifts Number of Sick Number of Sick Leave Hours Used Leave Hours During Previous Eligible for Calendar Year Conversion 0 40 8 32 16 24 24 16 32 8 40 0 For Employees Working Ten Hour Shifts Number of Sick Number of Sick Leave Hours Used Leave Hours During Previous Eligible for Calendar Year Conversion 0 - 40 10 32 20 24 30 16 40 8 50 0 For Employees Working Twelve Hour Shifts Number of Sick Number of Sick Leave Hours Used Leave Hours During Previous Eligible for Calendar Year Conversion 0 40 12 32 24 24 36 16 48 8 60 0 Compensation Plan: Page 10 For Combat Fire Managerial Employees: Number of Sick Number of Sick Leave Shifts Used Leave Shifts Available During Previous for Conversion Calendar Year No shifts 2-1/2 shifts 1 shift 2 shifts 2 shifts 1-1/2 shifts 3 shifts 1 shift 4 shifts 1/2 shift 5 or more shifts No shifts Any election by an employee to convert any sick leave to vaca- tion time must be made by notifying the Department of Human Resource Management, in writing, on or before January 31 of each year; otherwise, no conversion will be allowed for that calendar year and such conversion privilege shall be deemed waived for that calendar year. In no event shall sick-leave days be converted for other than the current year 's sick-leave allocation. Any sick-leave days properly converted to vacation benefits as above described, shall be deemed to be taken prior to any other days of vacation time to which the employee is entitled. Conversion days shall be construed as used prior to vacation days otherwise accrued by an employee. Authorized and unused sick leave may be accumulated from year to year. - Employees who have accrued at least ten days (80 hours) sick leave may be allowed to use no more than sixteen hours of accrued sick leave per calendar year for their own doctors and/or dentists appointments. This leave must be taken in one hour time blocks and may only be used upon prior approval of the employee's supervisor. D. Hospitalization Leave In addition to the sick leave authorized hereunder, each eli- gible employee of the City shall be entitled to thirty (30) days hospitalization leave (except for combat managerial employees of the fire department who shall be entitled to 15 duty shifts off for hospitalization leave) each calendar year , provided that such leave may be taken only if, and during the period that, such employee is actually confined to a hospital, acute care facility or other free standing out patient surgical facility as adopted under rules and regulations prescribed by the Mayor. Hospital leave shall not accumulate from year to year. Compensation Plan: Page 11 No employee of the City shall be entitled to receive hospitali- zation leave benefits for illness, injuries, or disability re- sulting from accidents arising out of or in the course of em- ployment for an employer other than the City. Each employee who takes authorized sick leave or authorized hospitalization leave shall continue to receive their regular salary during absence from work for the periods set forth in Article V, D. The Mayor may establish rules and regulations which extend hospitalization leave to circumstances where an employee re- ceives medical treatment on an outpatient basis, in lieu of hospital confinement . E. Light Duty The department shall if practical, allow an employee a light duty position while recovering from a temporary disability. F. Funeral Leave 1. Time off with pay will be granted to an eligible employee who suffers the loss of a wife, husband, child, mother, father, brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law, grandfather, grandmother, grandchild, or stepchild. In the event of death in any of these instances, the employee will be paid their regular base pay for scheduled work time from time of death through the day of the funeral, not to exceed five (5) consecutive days. Eligible employees will be permitted one additional day of funeral leave on the day following the funeral if such funeral is held more than 150 miles distance from Salt Lake City and if the day following the funeral is a regular work shift. Satisfactory proof of such death, together with the date thereof, the date and location of the funeral, and the date of burial, must be furnished by the employee to their supervisor . 2. In the event of death of relatives other than those enumerated in Article V. E. 1. an eligible employee will be paid for time off from scheduled working hours while attending the funeral services for such person, not to exceed eight hours. 3. In the event of death of friends, an eligible employee may be granted time off without pay while attending the funeral services for such persons, not to exceed four (4) hours subject to the approval of their immediate supervisor . Compensation Plan: Page 12 4 . In the event the death of any member of the immediate fami- ly as set forth in Article V. F. 1. occurs while an eligible employee is on vacation, their vacation will be extended by the amount of time authorized as funeral leave under said Article. 5. The provisions of this article shall not be applicable to employees who are on leave of absence other than vacation leave. G. Military - Entry Into Service Eligible employees of the City who enlist or are called or in- ducted into and enter active service in the State militia or any branch of the Federal military, naval, air, or marine ser- vice shall be entitled to absent himself or herself without pay as required by State and Federal law. H. Military - Annual Encampment Eligible employees who are or shall become members of the Or- ganized Reserve of the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard and Marines or any unit of the Utah National Guard, shall be allowed the difference in pay between their regular rate of pay and the base pay received while on duty for all time not in excess of ten (10) consecutive working days per year spent on duty, at annual encampment or rifle competition or other duties in connection with the reserve training and instruction of- the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines of the United States. This leave shall be in addition to annual vacation leave with pay. I. Leave for Jury Duty Eligible employees shall be entitled to receive and retain statutory juror ' s fees paid for jury service in the District and Federal Courts whose jurisdictions include Salt Lake County subject to the conditions hereinafter set forth. No reduction in an employee' s salary shall be made for absence from work re- sulting from such jury service. On those days that an employee is required to report for jury service and is thereafter excused from such service during his or her regular working hours fromthe City, he or she shall forthwith return to and carry on his or her regular City employment. Failure to so return to work shall result in the forfeiture of that day' s pay by such employee. J. Dependent Leave A Leave of absence may be requested by any employee covered by this Compensation Plan for the following reasons: Compensation Plan: Page 13 a. Becoming a parent through birth or adoption of a child or children. b. Due to the hospitalization of a dependent. The following provisions apply to the use of dependent leave: a. Dependent leave may be granted leave with pay on a straight time basis for a period not to exceed five consecutive days from the date a dependent commences residence with an employee or from the date of birth of the dependent or from the date the dependent becomes hospitalized; provided the child is a minor child and is permanently placed with the employee. However, marriage to a spouse with a child or children shall not be grounds for leave granted under Article V. J. even if adoption is then or subsequently considered and no leave shall be permitted for a child in the custody of an employee' s spouse prior to the marriage of that spouse by the employee. b. The employee has accumulated and available unused sick leave. Under no circumstances shall the employee be entitled to use as dependent leave more than five consecutive working days in a calendar year . c. The employee gives notice to his/her supervisor as soon as possible under the circumstances. d. The employee provides, upon request of supervisor, certification of birth or evidence of a child placement for adoption to his/her supervisor within five days following termination of such leave. A letter may be requested from the treating physician in the event of hospitalization of dependent within five days following termination of dependent leave used for this purpose. e. An employee' s sick leave shall be reduced by the number of hours taken by an employee as dependent leave under this section. K. Additional Leaves of Absence Additional leaves of absence may be granted an eligible em- ployee at the discretion of the department head. { Compensation Plan: Page 14 VI. INSURANCE A. Group Insurance Eligible employees of the City may participate in the City ' s group insurance plan in conformity with and under the terms of an insurance plan adopted by the Mayor covering such employees. Retired City employees, and other persons may also be permitted to participate in the plan under terms and conditions set forth by the Mayor . The Mayor shall cause the specific provisions of the group plan offered by the City to be detailed and made available to the employees. The City may deduct from each payroll all monies necessary to fund employee shares of insurance coverage and make all payments necessary to fund the plan within budget limitations established by the City Council . All employees eligible to participate in the group insurance plan shall be enrolled unless waivers are executed by employees desiring exemption, in form and manner and at such times as the Mayor may direct. B. Worker ' s Compensation In addition to the foregoing, the Mayor may provide for worker ' s compensation coverage to the employees under applicable provisions of state statute, and other service related disability plans compensating employees of the City who are permanently and totally disabled while in the discharge of their official duties as defined by the City' s Long Term Disability Programs . C. Disability Compensation Any eligible employee who is permanently and totally disabled as defined by the City' s long term disability program ( income protection plan) shall be entitled to disability compensation pursuant to said program. Employees in the Police Department will be covered by the Public Safety Long Term Disability Program. The City, at it' s own expense, shall have the right and opportunity to examine the person of any employee when and as often as may reasonably be required during employment with the City and during the pendency of a disability hereunder . No employee refusing such examination shall be eligible for the benefits provided by this_ paragraph. Refusal to submit to treatment for disabilities shall be grounds for termination of compensation specified hereunder . Compensation Plan: Page 15 When an injury for which compensation is payable under this paragraph shall be caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another employee of the City or person not in such employment, the City may require an employee claiming compensation hereunder as a condition of receipt of such compensation, to assign to the City any action for damage against such third person such injured employee may have. VII. SEPARATION FROM SERVICE A. Social Security Adopted. Exception. Salt Lake City hereby adopts the provisions of the Federal Social Security system and applies and extends all of the benefits of the old age and survivor ' s insurance of the Social Security Act to eligible employees; provided, however, that officers and employees in the classified Civil Service of Salt Lake City in the Fire and Police Departments shall be exempted from such adoption, unless determined otherwise by the Mayor or unless required by State or Federal Law. B. Retirement Programs The City hereby adopts the Utah Retirement Board System for providing retirement pensions to eligible employees. The City may permit or require the participation of eligible employees in it 's retirement program(s) under terms and conditions established by the Mayor (see Appendix C) . Such programs may include: 1. The Utah Public Safety Retirement System 2. The Utah Fireman's Retirement System 3. The Utah State Retirement System 4. Deferred Compensation Program 5. Retirement Incentive Programs The City may deduct from wages and salaries due eligible employees covered by this section, the payroll deductions determined by the Mayor to be necessary to fund employee contributions to such programs. (See Appendix C. ) C. Sick Leave Pay at Retirement At retirement an employee (or his estate, where death follows retirement but precedes payment) shall be eligible to receive a retirement benefit as stipulated in Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 6 of 1989 . Persons who retire under the eligibility requirements of the Utah State Retirement Systems and are not eligible under the above referenced Ordinance will be paid in cash at their then current pay scale, a sum equal to their daily rate of pay for 25 percent (25%) of the accumulated sick leave days reserved for the benefit of said employee at the date of his or her retirement. Compensation Plan: Page 16 In lieu of the above, employee may elect to convert sick leave privilege to hospital and surgical coverage. 50% of the sick leave hours available at retirement may be converted to a dollar allowance at the time of retirement. The sick leave hours converted to a dollar allowance shall be subject to any state and federal income and social security tax withholding required by law. An employee ' s available dollar allowance determines the number of months of medical and surgical coverage which may be purchased. If insurance costs go up due to group experience, the number of months of coverage will decrease. Such sick leave retirement benefit shall also be available to executive level employees who have not retired from employment with the City when employment has been terminated by death or resignation (provided that in the case of death, benefits shall be payable to the employee' s survivor) occurring after the date the employee has become eligible for full service retirement from the City. This provision shall not act to reinstate an employee with sick leave benefits which were in any respect lost, used, or forfeited prior to the effective date of this plan. D. LAYOFFS Whenever it is necessary to reduce the number of employees performing an activity or function defined by the Mayor or his/her designee within a City department because of lack of work or lack of funds, the City shall minimize layoffs by readjustment of per- sonnel through reassignment of duty in other departments. 1. Whenever layoffs are necessary, emergency, temporary, probationary and hourly employees performing essentially the same duties as the aforesaid work activity or functions being reduced shall be laid off first. 2. Full-time salaried employees shall be the last to be laid off in inverse order of the length of service of employees in the same job classification performing the same job functions and duties. 3 . Full-time salaried employees designated for layoff or actually laid off shall move into a vacant equal or lower classified job position, wherever situated in the City, for which the employee is qualified. Vacant means the Department of Human Resource Management has received a request to fill a position. Equal or lower classified means that the maximum salary for the vacant position shall be less than or equal to the maximum salary for the position being laid off. Said Compensation Plan: Page 17 employee, within the City department in which the layoff occurs, may also bump less senior, full-time salaried, temporary or probationary personnel ( in a job position and function previously and actually held by said laid off employee) for a position said employee is currently qualified and able to perform as determined by the Department of Human Resource Management. 4 . Employees who have been laid-off shall have rights for a one year period to placement in any vacant job which is at an equal or lower classification where they meet minimum qualifications. They shall not be subject to any further examination. Minimum qualifications on laid off job positions shall remain unchanged for the same one year period not restricting changes for bonafide business and operational purposes. 5. Employees who have been laid off in accordance with the above shall have the right to pre-bid on positions in the 100 and 200 series for a period of two years. They may also bid with the same preference as City employees for 300 series positions for the same two year period. 6 . Eligible employees subject to layoff because of lack of work or lack of funds shall be eligible for reimbursement of 50% of their accumulated unused sick leave hours. 7 . Persons in appointed positions are not eligible for layoff benefits as they are considered at-will employees and serve at the pleasure of the Mayor. EXECUTIVE PAY CLASS APPENDIX A 001 City Attorney $4320 - $6480 Director - Airports $4320 - $6480 002 Chief of Police $4056 - $6084 Director - Public Utilities $4056 - $6084 Director - Public Works $4056 - $6084 Fire Chief $4056 - $6084 003 Chief of Staff $3800 - $5700 Finance Director $3800 - $5700 Director - Development Services $3800 - $5700 Executive Director City Council $3800 - $5700 Director - Parks $3800 - $5700 Director Human Resource Management $3800 - $5700 004 Deputy Director Engineering & Maintenance $3456 - $5184 Major - Police $3456 - $5184 Executive Director - Housing Authority $3456 - $5184 Superintendent - Waste Water $3456 - $5184 Deputy Fire Chief $3456 - $5184 Director - Redevelopment $3456 - $5184 Deputy Director - Airport Operations $3456 - $5184 Superintendent - Water $3456 - $5184 Deputy City Attorney $3456 - $5184 Planning & Zoning Division Manager $3456 - $5184 Management Information Systems Manager $3456 - $5184 Deputy Director - Airport Finance & Administration $3456 - $5184 005 Building & Housing Division Manager $3324 - $4836 City Prosecutor $3324 - $4836 Chief Engineer - Public Utilities $3324 - $4836 City Engineer $3324 - $4836 Superintendent of Streets & Sanitation $3324 - $4836 006 Transportation Engineer $3024 - $4536 Executive Assistant to the Mayor $3024 - $4536 Executive Assistant - Policy Development $3024 - $4536 Deputy Director - Parks $3024 - $4536 Chief Finance & Accounting Officer $3024 - $4536 Financial Manager $3024 - $4536 City Treasurer $3024 - $4536 Capital Planning & Programming $3024 - $4536 Auditing & Reporting Manager $3024 - $4536 Fleet Services Manager $3024 - $4536 MANAGERIAL AND PROFESSIONAL APPENDIX B A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 0• P 301 1321 1358 1396 1434 1473 1513 1555 1598 1642 1687 1733 1781 1830 1881 1932 1985 302 1354 1392 1430 1470 1510 1551 1593 1638 1683 1729 1777 1825 1876 1927 1981 2034 303 1388 1427 1466 1506 1548 1590 1634 1679 1725 1773 1821 1872 1923 1976 2030 2086 304 1423 1463 1503 1544 1586 1630 1675 1721 1769 1817 1867 1919 1971 2025 2081 2138 305 1458 1499 1540 1582 1625 1671 1716 1763 1812 1862 1913 1965 2020 2075 2132 2191 306 1496 1537 1579 1622 1667 1713 1760 1809 1858 1910 1962 2016 2071 2128 2187 2246 307 1533 1575 1618 1662 1709 1755 1804 1853 1904 1957 2011 2065 2123 2181 2240 2302 308 1571 1614 1658 1704 1751 1799 1849 1899 1952 2005 2060 2117 2175 2235 2297 2360 309 1610 1654 1700 1747 1794 1844 1894 1947 2000 2055 2112 2169 2229 2291 2354 2418 310 1650 1695 1742 1790 1840 1890 1942 1995 2050 2106 2164 2224 2285 2347 2412 2479 311 1708 1755 1803 1853 1903 1956 2010 2065 2122 2181 2240 2302 2365 2430 2497 2566 312 1767 1816 1866 1918 1970 2024 2080 2137 2196 2257 2319 2382 2447 2515 2584 2655 313 1830 1881 1932 1986 2040 2096 2154 2213 2274 2336 2401 2467 2535 2604 2676 2749 314 1894 1947 2000 2055 2112 2169 2229 2291 2354 2418 2484 2552 2623 2696 2770 2846 315 1960 2014 2069 2126 2185 2244 2306 2370 2435 2502 2571 2638 2714 2789 2865 2945 316 2029 2085 2142 2201 2262 2324 2388 2453 2520 2590 2662 2735 2810 2887 2966 3048 317 2100 2158 2218 2278 2341 2405 2471 2539 2609 2681 2754 2830 2909 2988 3070 3155 318 2173 2233 2295 2358 2423 2490 2557 2628 2700 2775 2851 2929 3010 3092 3178 3265 319 2271 2334 2398 2464 2532 2601 2673 2746 2821 2899 2979 3061 3145 3231 3321 3411 320 2373 2438 2505 2574 2645 2718 , 2792 , 2870 2948 3029 3113 3198 3287 3376 3469 3565 321 2480 2548 2618 2690 2765 2841 2919 2999 3082 3166 3253 3342 3435 3529 3626 3726 322 2591 2663 2736 2811 2888 2968 3050 3133 3220 3308 3399 3493 3589 3687 3788 3893 323 2708 2782 2859 2938 3018 3101 3187 3274 3364 3457 3551 3649 3750 3853 3959 4067 324 2830 2909 2988 3070 3155 3241 3331 3423 3516 3613 3712 3815 3919 4027 4139 4252 325 2957 3039 3122 3207 3296 3387 3479 3575 3674 3775 3879 3985 4095 4208 4323 4442 , 326 3090 3175 3262 3352 3444 3539 '3636 3736 3839 3945 4053 4164 4279 4397 4518 4642 6-8-89 APPENDIX C RETIREMENT CC TIRIBUrIONS EMPLOYEE'S SHARE TOTAL 'IurAL GRAND PAID BY PAID BY EMPLOYEE EMPLOYEE TOTAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM EMPLOYEE EE CITY CONr CONT CXNN Utah State Retirement System Contributory -0- 6.00% 6.00% 3.65% 9.65% Utah State Reitrment System Non-Contributory -0- 6.80% -0- 6.80% 6.80% Utah Public Safety Retirement System 300 Series Exemp 1.84% 11.90% 13.74% 16.14% 29.88% Utah Public Safety Reitrement System Executive Exemp -0- 13.74% 13.74% 16.14% 29.88% Utah Firemen's Retirement System 300 Series Exempt (Steps A to L) 1.15% 13.66% 14.81% 11.15% 25.96% Utah Firemen's Retirement System 300 Series Exempt (Steps M and above) -0- 14.81% 14.81% 11.15% 25.96% Utah Firemen's Retirement System Executive Exempt -0- 14.81% 14.81% 11.15% 25.96% • • 41. 11L2.L., • • OFFICE;OF;;THE, �1TYCOUNCIL ;e? 7,7 SUITE 300."CITY HALL•; ▪ 324 SOUTH STATE S—P EET'a K ▪ SALT4AE.CITY..UTAH 84tfl_' March 20, 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: Council Members • FROM: Christine Richman O RE: Board Appointments. • The Mayor has submitted two Board appointment recommendations for your review. Both appointments are to the Central Business Improvement District. One is a reappointment to a first full term, conforming to your ordinance. The other is anew appointment. If you are comfortable with them, we would like to place the names on the agenda for first reading on April 4, 1989. Please let me know by Friday, March 31 if you need more information, or if you have a concern about any of them. The recommendations are: CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT: Jan Graham is recommended for reappointment to her first full term. Her initial appointment was made in November of 1988 and expired in January of • 1989. This term will expire in January of 1993. Ms. Graham is an attorney for Jones, Waldo , Holbrook & McDonough located in the First Interstate Bank Building. Although Ms. Graham does not reside within the City limits, she was selected by the CBID board as a representative of professional organization interests in the downtown. James Stewart is recommended for appointment for his first term. Mr. Stewart is suggested to replace Wayne Hadley as the representative for financial institutions on the Board. His term will expire in January of 1993. Mr. Stewart is President and Chief Executive Officer of Continental Bank and Trust. Although Mr. Stewart does not reside within the City limits, the main offices of Continental Bank are located at 200 South Main Street. cc: Cindy Gust-Jenson Emilie Charles Kerri Christenson • PALM ER DEPAULIS SI` , I,LN1 r AA‘' a ++t aiai r� 'R�P r �.a �+r�r.► ��rdr� MAYOR OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 324 SOUTH STATE STREET FIFTH FLOOR. SUITE 500 SALT LAKE CITY. UTAH 84111 535-7704 March 15, 1989 • Willie Stoler, Chairperson, and - Members of the Salt Lake City Council 324 South State Street, Room• 300 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Wi l-1 i e: I am transmitting herewith recommendations for board appointments which I would appreciate the Council to advise and consent upon: CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Jan Graham, to be reappointed for a term extending through January 1, 1993. James Stewart, to be appointed as the financial institutions representative for a term extending through January 1, 1993. I would appreciate your consideration of these appointments and ask that they be placed on the Council 's agenda at the earliest opportunity. If I can provide you with any further information, please don't hesitate to call . Sincerely, Mayor PD/jf Enc. z-3 Salt Lake City Planning Commission Staff Report Petitions -No. 400-731 and 732 by Clark Development to Rezone Property and to Vacate and Close Certain Streets and Alleys within the Sugar House Business District. OVERVIEW t I INGE This staff report is addressing two petitions . Petition 400-731 731 is requesting the city to r� rezone properties located between u Simpson Ave. and Interstate 80 and between Highland Drive and 1300 East Street from Residential V2 . "R-2" and Commercial "C-1" to a Commercial "C-3" . Petition 400- 732 is requesting the city to vacate public streets and alleys I § 9 • in the same general area . (see map) The area affected by this request is within Phase III of FAIRMONT PARK the Sugar House Neighborhood wva .,a� Development Plan / Redevelopment Project Area . (See Figure 1) I The Clark Development proposal calls for 235 , 000 sq. ft . of new retail uses . The Shopko building consists of 102 , 000 sq. ft. of the new retail area . See the attached table for a detailed breakdown of buildings proposed. Several restaurant pads and a grocery store are included in the building tabulation. Also proposed is the renovation of the existing Simpson Avenue retail mall . Clark Financial Corporation is requesting from Salt Lake City financial assistance of over $2 . 6 million to provide the opportunity to redevelop this area of the Sugar House Business District . If Salt Lake City is to assist financially in this development, all impacts related to implementing the proposed development package should be mitigated and the development should comply with the master plan policies of the Sugar House Business District. BACKGROUND The 1985 Sugar House Master Plan identified this area as a medium to high density residential area . However , with the adoption of the Sugar House Neighborhood Development Plan this area was identified as a mixed used retail center . The land use plan contained within the Sugar House Business District Strategies/Recommendations Plan (Westplan) establishes the present city policy for "future land uses" within the Sugar Ho s Business District . (See Figure 2) C�. • i . k. i . Figure 1 . • SLMR Fre E NEIGHBORFCCD I EVFLCPME 7r PLAN - • • - • PfESIM Pf AM •. • • . 1 r . , 1 . 1 1 . t j ` o�!r i caccc g _1` ( � a L ` ' ,t - �aC.y=avEHUE .Cray.' n C LL 1 w v I Z 1 — Ci ___.:�: �cco ,is luE ��-1 i • �° C c �;_-� -7 '` _ � I:' _ � .—::!rj PHASE l I ... � •_, G .._. ..... -▪ - — , ter. � � •w r L� LI r 01,— ... ... . - .. 7--:-.. I?: L.,.... .,, .. IC� i :� r"; '•G- E• a r�; ,• ( i �I �� 1 .►�1.• �`r'_ i (r �' �� 1 /, _ z—�_' JILUH , �+.rr— _mac—_ - j_- •4_ — • �� r:= I<<1== — _ _ PHASE II -- . -•-• "'",- .........-.....•................-. .1.......::.:=.1. \ • . • - • - r I 4 .�L_'--_mil 7 -t.-_ --` ' .•. � --=yi`:. ._ --_ mac: _ --_ 1 u..o<�, •'E..IJE j '.'.'t 5 c. = -r==n -Y: PHASE Ill -: - IAIAYQt1►ring �_�:�1.�::�.•_-��^- -TY:.Y:�:_Y_._•-_:vl-:: \ J TNic°5'a'= 30 • Figure 2 • 1 • i • . t (J TC_ C oi n: 1 = I Y w. _ Q J e. - .w+uww 1 AA610NA AVENUE r-'l a a CI „n;1, 1,- ESIDENT1AL��.„ a ❑ C "STREET 4 _ a • Z1 c � - I'" � - - c o Le ,v�� ^irr_ INSiTTLJTIONA4 j �c co ❑ Q '-CL •+COD .VE1!UE - -' -- - 1 n C n C '^ n0 IEld R E S I 0 E N T I A7G• "�[ I ...i :::_........._..-...'.— 1'Al f Li c • . } 'Av..- n ` INSTITUTION C PERFOR MANCE ; ,.. i 1 G •--' e1 1! ! cicgco:_, ,.., r- Z,O N E �., '''' u�.� i'" i;_;,.. PARKING 1 �`:a IMUL IDEN IAL ,=. L ', =/�•_ <i N,:: t_ RESIDENTIAL IH PK'G ,,q_ PC'G PK•G I_ A R K I N • ,a• 1�/�' MIX'cDUSc � 1 � w • �71 /1<• -1 I ENTERTAINMENT !`-�. ''" 'S: C r-=e OI < �L 1 !w ::.::...+::•.':::: 1UI IC a 7l �I:C....,‘II iiin•Ylnwb ( ';bi:..�. oFFCJ`LSTTf. f !�vil'•rAti,III iIII I...III � ..... yl � i 11 1 C • ,�,::, �� .4 c = T C O M J.I c R C I A L �,•••".:::vi�•,• ••.� \\`.\\ /� ••':.v r::::nNnv. Y ?:S NR E , V O M 11 • c •,,::v:r.... <.....s:: ^� r:a:•::w+.x,.::•::•n:• .... ....:•:.14: (^'' 'JC SCUi- STR_°- c.r- SCVin n.- 1 ��•.• w.,,......:Zi •'1•`., .:: .....,:•Y crjT \ � ma \\��\. �,".''"' ,;T.:,' -t:',S T R F. - T C O�•.41 !.1 � � C I A L r_ �.,;:i,�:;•. c 1 \' \ r E:^�ti r NIIX_]US' M \\c .11XED USc -� L �fiir:::i�i�i:: .. 11 It3+1,�11 � i::Mr:n•:::�. �.... AE-aL"SEAVK:. \\� CONVEMEtIC- \ N. - I,- -•--.1 lS�` r •:'` \'�ESIO E;RIAI \\\- aETAG.SERVICE.. \\" Cn C. :"I:: :'(f:):i°'•. lI. .\\\�\�\�\t\'....�� \ \.�AES!D'eM iIAL µ•`' c - h:+X j.... NS 1T.:.o++��.�'' P A R L_Y ?.I I C A= '^ =^'- .i''\ ]] r+ ]( `:: P_RFORMANC:_ A•::::: i:T'ii: ueRAAr 41a'. e `{�'_' ^_'•:�:• \\.9 .L• „'..1...„,,,...'"'�:'Yi:::ii: MusEUM /::. »a� \ rN SE PARK -� -;:•:• ::I:':ii Y:• -LONG . I �� m _ ".s�^�:_\•� SVGA OU..o C _ I ""'}MAJOR ` = \\\.,,• f i }y t j.. u -� . — _ — ,r7, ` ... .. V,.i ‘�-::;vv':>i MIXED r `\\\\M�\\E\\\\S �''�-'"'1i--i I .�RETAIL �:r::::^'.!: :..�.•..:• fAIXE] USE ' ;,C=NTER :.w:,,,:::. e \�MIXED USE \ i ...� 1" .•.. \• ......'i:itCe,yr. RETA,L.•sEAVIc_ h _ \SEAVICE/RE. 'L. �-^ ! ! r._r fn:i:RETAv SERVICE:;Y; RETAIL MEocaL OFF.' \\OFFCE "' ._L LrL' - ,FEE ;,,. ENTERTAINMENT . RESIDENTIAL \\•qE TU. - SPECIALTY SNOPS \ \ \\ ` SIOEN L•\ R E1S I D E N'I > PZ PK G ^.OFFICE ,.•xMl.'!.Wf `--.•-. 1 C\ `F'�"'N\�..�` ^\ I` L f. wn- v �_r i 1 • 1. C C t}:f`1 I- Yw - .0 ... ...` 1..::::nv::.....;;;.• ......•••i.y l-. .. ENT. 11 ....... ::.:...W: •\\ 1��1J SUCAc..ONr 7aIvE +, \': ::?::��.1 { JRET ' ::: ::":?,*:i, 1\cON RNCE< F iz `' ,. ?\ :: :; ::..,.i.MA'OR RETAIL.nn:..i. _._ F cl..osoN .vEr+uE I .•<:;••. o\ i:�.'v:°h::::foil:°:} CENTER •.: :..: ` �a ��\�• ^. ... .CEJARTMENT TORES _ 1 �"' G; ..•:' ; ri;f:IfFCOSEC MALL SNOPS:'i:' \�� : MIXE7 USE �\ :.�..:.::..:.: ,..:.::: ::v:::.:n:.,v::: Eli. \\\��\ ,n I I. OFFICE SERVICE- k`'Jflr'%'a..,:,.,;:,-,__, : RESICE .....,..[+•:.'...•:......:•............... ...tom `US EO I - Z RESIDENTIAL •.::::=7 GiN1C.r wA4:i.l' i:yr USE • I .\:\•`\`...t�;_ ...IN^---,Itf�:::.•tt1: vnt,,,;:M1::.:..'-. ' �oFFicE is FAIRMONT PARK 11 \j'\�'•`—.-\ 1;•li•P.::tiL:::::u;w::un 5-7y...'�:::`L' :; •,...„CE - 'r'- iai i :::.::)::::•::n•::d:n..•••:aiie \\\\\ _ • r ~ • .:::v:e :v:.v:a:. :::: it C]� - - 'S�uai:iiv}v:.pry-.•ir:.:41.R`�rY"' - , NMI 11 IIMM11MEd 11��\ ./`i I 1 ,NirRST.:TS ao ` : I, P i \\ 1 • The proposed project is within Phase III development area and the land use designation is for a mixed use retail center. The purpose of this mixed use retail center is to encourage a mixture of retail commercial, service commercial, office, hotel and public openspace uses . Any complex of multiple structures developed within this area needs to be functionally and aesthetically interrelated. Planning criteria in the Master Plan for this area does not call for neither the extremes of detailed standards nor complete flexibility and discretionary negotiation of standards. A review of development proposals may be made by a design review committee established by the Redevelopment Agency. On their May 11, 1989 meeting the Redevelopment Agency referred to the Planning Commission the implementation of Phase III of the Redevelopment Plan. The design objectives for this area are contained in the Sugar House Master Plan on pages 6-9 and 16-17. Within the Redevelopment Plan Phase III development was recommended not to occur until Phases I and II were completed as part of implementing the neighborhood development plan. Phase III. is to be considered only if market conditions have changed to warrant proceeding with development within this area prior to completion of development of the other two areas . To .support and recommend the actions of these petitions within Phase III of the redevelopment plan a determination of whether . market changes have occurred to warrant the _city' s participation in Phase III needs to be made. This was accomplished through a public meeting on May 11, 1989 by the Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors. At that meeting, Clark Financial Corporation submitted evidence to the Redevelopment Agency indicating the market changes to support the development of Phase III . The Redevelopment Agency found that current market conditions in the Sugar House Project Area, and the completion of portions of Phase I activities , and portions of Phase II activities , that the Board of Directors have determined that the market conditions referred to• in Section K of the Sugar House Neighborhood Development Plan have changed and now warrant that the Agency proceed with the planning and implementation of Phase III activities . ANALYSIS Existing Land Uses The requested rezoning area consists of approximately 17. 7 acres. Within the Residential "R-2" area there are 37 residential structures . Within the Commercial "C-1" area there is three residential structures and six commercial structures . This information is based upon the existing land use files of the city. Several of the residential structures are occupied. • Street and Alley Closures Three streets are requested for closure between Highland Drive and 1300 East along with the existing alleys . A portion of the Ashton right of way functions as the access to Interstate 80 and has been deleted from the calculations below. The requested areas are highlighted on the site plan. Streets Alleys Simpson Ave . 87, 500 sq. ft. North 19 , 200 sq. ft. Stringham Ave . 64 , 700 sq. ft. South 18 , 300 sq. ft. Ashton Ave . 55 , 200 sq. ft. Total 37 , 500 sq. ft. Total 207 , 400 sq. ft. Appraisal estimate of land value in this area by David Van Drimmelen, MAI and Tod Jones Appraisers is $10 . 50 per square. foot. The approximate value of property requested for closure would $2 , 571, 000 . Closure of only a portion of Stringham Avenue is requested however , the staff recommends that if the proposal is accepted, then complete closure of this street is necessary . A remnant stub street is not a desirable solution. The construction of a culdesac would be necessary to allow a stub street. MASTER PLAN CONSIDERATIONS - The following are Planning Criteria excerpted from the Sugar House Master Plan: SUGAR HOUSE DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES - To encourage new development which will substantially strengthen and unify the Sugar House Business District focused at the Sugar House Plaza Monument at 2100 South and 1100 East . - To improve circulation capabilities including street networks , off-street parking , pedestrian movement opportunities . - To provide pedestrian-scale activities in the Sugar House Business District by providing openspace corridors and streetscape amenities . HOUSING PRESERVATION AND REDEVELOPMENT - Creation of an urban residential neighborhood within the Sugar House Business District . - Comprehensive rezoning for appropriate residential development and mixed-use development. •• • SITE PLAN PROPOSED BY CLARK-DEVELOPMENT • WILMINGTON AVE 1 ( t 1 _ L. 1 \ • 1 N 1 1— _ — o o c ,' �i _ 1.. i \1� t/ I .1!I ii'1�! li�il(1y C 1 t.aa s.. . c II I • Q••.r../ i A spa r� �� % — — ' -I ll 7 `\V �/ L K V l.. ;ice B . -- : =I I-Y • \• i. . - --_-�III • V-•. •••111111,1�;1,..1 .I, .li-:.:111111.,1,111,(lil::li11:1111.itiv;:�� - - SIMPSONm- r AVE --_-.\ � r•=_ -- =�i ` —' —_ — — —- — i ! �. — _I _- — — — — — — — — ; C `i l_ — • ;\_...,. . - --- — — — = • \ _.' _ i — _— .. 1 �I u _ - - !•__ -• .. �.----•.,..�..1 STRINGHAM AVE C • • .... .:_ _. ..• 1,1... Ji i__. `�f.. • .r - _ I _ __~_'�� F... •1.i i:..,1,1.1,_ _•. .I::I,.i,...,. ::i :i.illi ., . I - - -:—�.T:�=y.—� . ....,.,:,..,' ; _—__—.--- \ - _-- ••:r`�_ ',--,u i• i I ... • '_ , •_ ._.i'—.l _ �'�—u�:.; . '.. it 3 ,.I. ' ! — 7. _—r .;r.�!;:7:vW):4 ::..: !• a! - .. ....,,=-. f 1 ' ":_ - -'..,- �: _I...1.i,..11 iir L' .1 I .. :I; _1 ; ! I •- • •1-j - — � �_ - - \` I 1- _ ._iY>j=--, G — 1 \\^- I": •1 �iiit!iiii.lil!t:illill1141i1111.11iii•(,1t.1. • .:111i i11ii�` / . '— \••• • --i .111 .-=. r1:1- ASHTON AVE i - TTTITh Streets and Alleys Petitioned for Closure - Providing residential development in the mixed-use center north of. Simpson Avenue and east of 1200 East may fulfill the objectives of introducing an urban residential neighborhood. COMMERCIAL AREAS - SUGAR HOUSE BUSINESS DISTRICT - Concern for decentralized commercial growth. - Incorporate pedestrian orientation and pedestrian amenities into development alternative; use convenient and attractive pedestrian linkages between anchor attractions . - Incorporate adequate off-street parking into development with identified access , proper buffering and landscaping . - Provide guidance to development proposals through a "Compatibility Review" ordinance to ensure harmony with the urban design objectives of the Master Plan. - Innovative development proposals integrated properly with open space amenities , community facilities , and pedestrian opportunities . - Salt Lake City should retain ownership of all property it currently owns in the Sugar House Business District, including streets , alleys and parcels , until such time as comprehensive development plans are to be implemented. Future rights-of-wavy could thus be acquired through land trade arrangements rather than expenditure of capital funds . _ - Whereas the city can offer financing incentives and capital improvements , private developers can provide innovative development proposals integrated properly with the urban design criteria and policies . OPENSPACE IN THE BUSINESS DISTRICT - Presently the amount and quality of openspace in the Sugar House Business District requires improvement. A streetscape improvement plan should include a landscaping element and a street tree element providing more "green space" to the business district. - As redevelopment occurs in the Sugar House Business District and the multi-use center , bikeways and pedestrian corridors should be incorporated into development plans . TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION - In designing any off-street parking facility, customer service and convenience , and minimum interference with street traffic flow must receive high priority. Accessibility and ease of entering , circulating , parking, unparking , and exiting, are all important factors in the location and design of off-street parking facilities . Access points should be landscaped, however , vegetation should be low so as not to interfere with sight distance and signage. - 1300 East Street south of 2100 South is an arterial street designed to serve large volumes of traffic. Access to adjacent land should be from side streets. - Commercial-oriented traffic should use Interstate 80, 1300 East, 2100 South, and a new road aligning the I-80 off ramp with Sugarmont Drive as primary access to the business district. Secondary access is along 1100 East and Highland Drive. Sugar House Business District - Parking and Circulation Study 2100 South Street is a major east-west route crossing the Salt Lake Valley. By relocating local traffic to an alternative east- west street the conflict between through and turning vehicles could be reduced. CONSERVATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION - The proposed Highland Park Historic District is divided into eastern and western halves by 1300 East Street, the western half is bisected again by Highland Drive. To encourage stabilization of the western half of the Highland Park District, the following steps are recommended: - Encourage commercial through-traffic to use 13.00 East Street, instead of Highland Drive, to get to the Sugar House Business District. - Redesign the intersection at Richmond Street and Highland Drive to ensure that commercial through-traffic uses 1300 East. - It is recommended' in the master plan that the portion of Highland Drive between Richmond Street and Interstate 80, which is located within a potential historic district, be downgraded to a residentially oriented two-lane roadway. • - The collector street connecting Highland Drive and 1300 East is essential to the elimination of negative impacts of excessive traffic on .Highland Drive upon the preservation of this potential historic district. URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT Design Guidelines - The streetscape design should incorporate a consistent theme strengthening the association of unrelated buildings . - The general pattern of buildings should help to define street areas and other public openspaces . - Islands should be provided between parking aisles and stalls to - break up hard-surfaced areas . Berms and other changes of grade are recommended wherever possible. - Uniform identification signs should designate access to parking lots and parking structures . - Distinctiveness of buildings and areas should be revealed by preserving and highlighting architectural features common to the area by using special material and colors . Building Height and Setback - Highland Drive is a commercial fringe area which has a fifteen foot landscaped setback and a height limit of two stories. - Mixed-use areas are required to have a twenty foot landscaped front yard setback with the height limit approved by the Planning Commission. HOUSING WITHIN THE SUGAR HOUSE BUSINESS DISTRICT 1 . Rezoning of the Residential R-2 area would eliminate the city ' s most effective tool to ensure that some form of urban housing will occur within the Business District . A transfer of land area that is zoned for residential development would allow the city to retain this leverage tool to implement- the master plan. It is recommended that property to the north- within Phase II area , that is designated for Residential Host Mixed-Use be rezoned temporarily to a Residential "R-7" or "R-5" classification as a holding zone until the city can create and put in place an Urban Residential Host Mixed Use Zone. The Residential "R-5" classification is identified within the Sugar House Master Plan as the temporary base zone for the residential area . 2 . Public property that is requested to be vacated instead of being sold could be traded for other property owned by Clark Financial to be used for future housing development and right of ways for public streets . OTHER PLANNING ISSUES Social considerations In rezoning residential property to commercial and utilizing city subsidies the city should require that adequate notice to renters be provided and possible relocation assistance be required. Property Disposition Within the Neighborhood Development Plan it is identified that all real property acquired by the Redevelopment Agency be sold or leased to public or private persons or entities for the development for uses permitted in the plan. Salt Lake City ordinance Chapter 2-58 City-Owned Real Property identifies methods of surplus property disposition. These methods are either trade, sale, lease, or irrevocable transfer preceded with Planning Commission review. SITE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS - To comply with master plan guidelines Circulation 1 . Provide east/west connector street from 1300 East that links with Sugarmont Drive. This street would allow building orientation to a public street and provide the necessary linkage to minimize the traffic impact upon Highland Drive south of the Interstate. Without a connector street traffic would be focused toward Highland Drive and negatively impact the housing preservation objectives of the master plan. 2. Provision for a design solution that would be adequate for west bound traffic onto Interstate 80 . Until it is known how much property if any is needed to allow for an appropriately designed interchange for I-80 vacation of the_portion of Ashton Avenue effecting the on ramp should not occur . 3 . Access Drives into parking lots. To ensure efficient internal circulation, storage areas at access drives must be designed to allow for adequate capacity. Storage on the driveway should be of sufficient length to keep stopped vehicles from blocking the path of entering vehicles . Failure to provide sufficient storage will result in unsafe and confusing vehicle conflicts . The following are recommended minimal design requirements for access drives off of arterial roadways and the major access point off of Highland Drive. a. Minimum throat length of 75 feet that is free of curb cuts into parking areas . b. Maintain a 120-150 feet of internal storage area . c. Use of landscaped areas to provide adequate visibility of access drives. 4. Loading Docks - location and design a. Locate at south side of building along freeway. • .-. . 1. • •• BU i i, I NG !'ABUL.1770N CODE SQUARE :00TAGE USE •80, 000 _ •-t,-= Office 3u= 1di c C 54, 925 New Groce-a Snore • 7 , 700 New =eszauran: . .,313 New Kesza'u,ann • . 2, 400 New Convenience Store/Gas 24 , 000 New RmZe..47 S`'ccko 102, 000 _ - -- ( ►C.av�+Kv 34 ,200 New Reza-- 22, 00 Ne es`�r, _n-T . i .lt RETAIL (:xc• J•.• . C.a = _. - "A" )C':" ) L t_ ^25 ^ S� . . GAG 7. _.r .-.-. —3-54 ,02.3 i ,,77- rV71V'T7, . yt 5 , E50 - -= Re-=. M ' 000 ---r - .�,_.._, Rec_- 1 12,300 ?u". e Re-_41 Tc�a1 1G9 , 630 (Tc_a1 not .`included ir. new _ ez_ ' So-"art =CCtaCE above) • - -_ :. ._ Zcne,_3. . . 127 -( 1 1-5 r(c -- •• Zone. 4 . _ .. • . - _. 345 j _ . •_.Strsc uraT narking g under -c=ece__� sore tt-,tt • 85 ,:�,t� -_. .. Tctal . .-- T 919 Y -� • _ - L • ________-__IT------r-7-1ri. I• 1-••• . CIO •' --------;1.i I 1_,...,,A... _....... ..., .,, ,..,to • ........_-. r,,, stv,_ ________--- ,... • i i ,,,j A , ILI-1-11-11-fThi liir IIIIIIII"<"\ ----- . --- ( .',N.. ! 1 I:I; _.., • --(1-) -- --ry!:• i ,N_--,, ,.- ,., .„--,...-- __ ,.....--- - -- --- ',....•-...7, - • _-.. -,E-, x 1-J , , _, - , - -- ! , .- ),•f . F 0 . -- • j - /j.k •• , _,„ . • = •1 ! ! i• -- • 1 i.1 Ir.' 1 I -.. 11 1 ;.'f !-_-_-• , = ililliiilliiIIII .....-::::.---" .------ 1 02 j ?' \- _ • H (----:_____„.;:-1 - - - • ..-----:-.1 r :_-_•• --- 1 i , . • ._ 1 - .,_-, L.- -_:• i - -- • i , •. 1- 1,....-• 1 '. 1-.- - : I T - I I 1 - 1 f • - 1 • - -- - -- - is iI :.- - - -- ''' - • `.1 1---1 . i I 7,TiTinfi[T11_ 111111.1.i - 13 1 ' ,Li i- . I , , --1• - ,, ( - -T-..si r .: •-' - 1.. ILL_JH111111111‘.1111 • -x . i . '- 1 ,I 7_ Di 1 1.. --1 11-11: ii„.___,....„.„..„_,..... i -'1:=1- = :.i• • ) •:r.,•••P••'" .'P.-;V.l'•IC .1: .• ' '11. \ - .--)1 -1- 7- :1.4\ .•1 ' "1.•;!..! .',.'r , .•:Iii•':;111:•.1:,., ,: 2 i ; C.- 1 1 ...,-- le c-I - : - I-I- 7--- r'!,...•.!''''-''. • ..!!:,-. D ii.47•A;l',-.0.,- Li+ ',Q1. I i • . 1--.1" I Ntit111-1-1-1-11 - 1 - 'ii--i•.:1:.1.1.-',.!;?::,-.1 •'•-.0.,..,?;1;,•"•-y: ,-'),' •[I•4::, • ..1 = P.k-::,.,1;i:.r.1:c.V..,!',..ii,fr ..61.0,..:.i$ '..''3,11!':'-j-•'. 4!:.! 1 r i LI i 1 .....1 7 , I :-- d;,..- 4:it::I.'f',:•.4' Viiiii. :41°J11:',A11. 1:,A',',,II 41111'1, , 1 1 TT I.1 1.1 III .1 1 1 11 -11:1 . * . ,y .4:,. qi-, FfIliii 1;1 1 , ; .:11 .:,.,:.;..,,,i0,1.-i .',V-i.',14' 1 /4' ••-i • '•-•-I- •.- pr411' ;'.1.01ii:I, ' 'pnAil',,--,.--..t,,In.':. • .io . ! . l'. ;-•:-/ \- 1:1 1 ---1-1-1-11iii III-1-11- F. . '---i_-=_*-•.,--- • ,,,..0,v ,.. /1..c ,i ,.,!1;• .i . 111111 1-1111111 1111 III-1111-[- :=-1 ..... - 1% 111111 LI K ii si$I!;! ,q,-,.• 1,';.1:!:;!'tit it -;,-,'1.5.y, 4 3 $1;!,e4•11-e.viii5i:F1‘:); .- 1‘."It.ii.,,:pqr.yi>,,,, , : - 1__, :, Lf4k.,.[..?..,.!k...tfecl; , IpIrt.,1kft„,:,,,;,;.. .,44 •• ...13.- ' -1 \ 1 0 \ - -1 - ji'1:',.F: '1,:. :11.1',1 Mt;M;/lu tr./11.1111i,, 0.11 1 , „. il \ -1-: 111-1-1-Ill 3 -i ' 0 i .-;,-,7-7! . . \ o-ra. - .di„..;1.-k:st..;,ii:k',i111, ., '„1/. .V.I.;i;.,L• P!,!.4(:,1; If,i .,i) ill -1-11-1111 11 I 1111111111 il tii.;21 . i \ = • _ 11 n , Z 1--1. :=-- •RN•44•fiViNCA,144/ 11/•iittlN•4,•4"ri'..1, 14.1}r .i 1 J-1 - ,-,ttitt,44, '',.IP;?"•4:11f.:6.11''' ':„X4 . 1 , nilitili;1111111 1 l'i .i , 1• I i 1 • 11111111 Fi ' ,.[I'.--11:-. '''12.-r-Li'L'"L-14: li II 1 I 1111 I III I I 111111-111111. 1 It-7 7- \ i- - i I j t j 1-77---7.1 I.,1. ; 1 1 1 i I I 1 kl 1 / !11.111.1 .• •-‘,)N....\\ i .1 1111T m . _ ! ii 1==, =.1-.3 Ci•::-___I• '. CI--1 --- ' '- 1 -•- •••:_I:i • = :: T-1 7=7. :! =;7---[RI 11•1•11• 1 1.'4__.--.1 1 l•-1-1•• Ill til ' .1 \ j > .7.- , - • . _,.._ =_••1 -_-cii _1 7-- ) !,•, -,,, i. ., i co ... i i 0 :•-- . `- r - i • ) 1 111111111 .- ' ' I 0 . ,, -- 1•.: I-- - - .- 2 1 22 F1 17-_-. [1111111 i 11111111 1-1111-1 iii_ - ! - • . \ 1 ? Linn n \\I 8 = ,. , 1 1 i i 0 - Z I - HIM 1 lip i K 1 __- i ,, , ; 1 •1 _7 .- i. i - ,i,i,., i•iiiiiiiiiiiino ! ----..., 1 I HI ,•• > li 11111111111111111111111111.1112,1 ) - I -1! < _.. 0 i -T > ii- I , (HIM , _g , ! , ,-, , )1 rn -.-- - i- i 1 . •,; 1 i v,._ , _, < r_i_____, n 1 1 it 1 , - >„‹.t : , i .E----. - LI-- 77: 1 17:- 7: 7-i :: M -71 - H11-111111 !111111 1 HI 1111-111 . I . , , , I I I .1,--J--__ _ . i i ._..... . . 1 __ - ___ . 1 1 1 • •1 I I-L \ t . - -- ! I- - - • :i !!.. ..ri -- n ! i !• ! - 111 u 1-\ I I/ • , \ ! • -• • il ! - , 1 1 1 ii 1 D 111.1 1 1 II i 1 I I. 1 I 1 111 I II I II I • -0 i I - 0 117.1 I---- j I n ,--, l J . I ; 111-111111; 1:1; Li I ---. 1 - 1 - 1 1 ••• : ..., . 1-- , 1 -- - 1 . --- - - -1 - l- i_111111 ' i -------1 •-; -1 __ ._ . _.I , ...__ _ ---- , 1 1 _ 1 1 ! - - - - . - - 17-7-7. :=--1-1 :1 .-- I- . i i I II 1LLIJ LL1 1 11111 LIS-, ' TTI \, _ . _ , - - I- .. i j \ ' _ I \ \ \ :- rn 1 . . i I .1 _ .1 -1 --: --2----_. • 1 • -1 =1 _ 1 : 1i ! - _ ___I • - --- - 1k----ill =IT • t i II _t i 1 I iI 1 • :n -- -7 - -- =I 1 ill,11TfTl 11111;r1[J1111-r11, M if_ • .-- i 1 vi6 • ',. --r .. : ./ i ! 1 • 1 ,----- • ...... __. 1111111111 : 111111111111111111 I )II n II 1 ... ... . •..._... _. . ... -. , • ' • 4‘ifin G Ae'r b. Provide and show location for other buildings . c . Loading docks should be screened from 1300 East and Highland Drive view. 5 . Provision of handicapped parking spaces . 6 . Meet all of the circulation and transportation concerns of the city Transportation Engineering Division. Open Space 1 . Provision of landscaped front yard setbacks for 1300 East, the new connector street , and Highland Drive. 2 . Provision of island landscaped areas to break up the impact of the hard surfaced parking areas . Refuse Collection Show locations and how they will be appropriately screened. RECOMMENDATIONS Rezoning Petition Considerations To rezone this area to a Commercial "C-3" classification would not be in accordance with the master plan. A commercial "C-3A' zone classification would be more appropriate . This district requires a fifteen foot landscaped front yard setback , which would be equivalent to what the master plan calls for within the commercial fringe areas . However , the Master Plan acknowledges the need for a new zoning designation. As a condition of the rezoning the city should require that the approved site plan meet the urban design criteria of the master plan. Specifically a determination as to the minimal landscaping requirements of parking areas . The development plans need to include provision of street trees . Provision of a holding zone of other properties within Phase II to ensure provision of future residential development should be considered . Street and Alley Closures Petition Considerations All of the existing streets and alleys should be closed excluding any necessary right of way needed for access to Interstate 80 . However , the developer should provide an appropriate right of way and improvements of a public connector street between Sugarmont Drive and 1300 East. 0 Recommendation The staff recommends that the Planning Commission convene the informal hearing on June 8, 1989 to receive presentation of the development proposal from Clark Development, a staff review of the Master Plan considerations, and citizen input by receiving public comment on the development proposal. Clark Financial is presenting their development plan to the Sugar House Community Council of June 7 , 1989. The staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the review of this proposal to their June 22nd meeting focusing on the site design considerations. At this meeting the Planning Commission recommendation to the City Council should be formulated. At the request of Clark Development the City Council has scheduled a July 11, '1989 public hearing on these petitions. The staff will continue to prepare the final recommendations to • the Planning Commission for the June 22nd meeting. Based upon the present information and site plan, the staff can conclude that many of the critical design elements and development criteria of the master plans are not being followed. These critical planning elements include: 1. Circulation - No provision' for east - west connector street. 2. Building orientation and focus - The present site plan appears to be decentralizing the commercial growth within the Sugar House Business District. Retail use on_ Highland Drive between Ashton and Stringham Avenues should be rebuilt or retained, a parking lot with the back of the Shopko' building expose to Highland Drive view is not an acceptable urban design solution. • 3 . Pedestrian Circulation - Not addressed in present site plan. The Planning Commission should consider how this would be accomplished within the Sugar House Business District if not included in the Phase III area such amenities need to be provided in the Phase II area. 4 . Landscaped Setbacks - Request for Commercial C-3 zoning. Landscaping within parking lots . Streetscape design on 1300 East should respond to existing design on Highland Drive and 2100 South. Everett Joyce June 1989 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CRAIG E. PETERSON 324 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 201 DIRECTOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 535-7777 To: Salt Lake City Council May 31, 1989 Re: Petition No. 400-668 submitted by Club Dejavu Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on July 18, 1989 at 6: 20 p.m. to discuss changing the license ordinance on location restrictions for a Class B Private Club. Availability of Elands: Not applicable Discussion and Background: Club Dejavu has been operating as a public restaurant with a State mini-bottle license and a Class B beer license which allows beer to be sold in its original container. The address for the building was issued on Church Street, however, Church Street was vacated by the City in 1954 and is considered a private right of way. The current ordinance identifies three geographical location criteria for the establishment of Class B private clubs or Class C beer license. Club Dejavu is located within a district that specifies that no more than two establishments may be located on any lineal block. A lineal block is defined as both sides of a major street between two intersecting major • streets. Also, in the exception section up to three establishments may be located on streets within the interior of a block. However, the total number may not exceed 9. Two private clubs are currently located on the north side of 400 South between State and Main thus eliminate the possibility of locating any more private clubs on either side of 400 South without a change to the location criteria of the ordinance. Both club owners have expressed their opposition to this requested change. No responses have been received from any of the other surrounding property owners. The appropriate City Departments have reviewed this request and have recommended approval on a site specific basis. The Police Department does not want to create an enforcement problem through a concentration of clubs in one location and have requested that land use not be the only consideration in changing this ordinance. The Planning Commission has reviewed this petition and recommends that the ordinance be amended as outlined below: Section C. Exceptions 3. - On those blocks which do not have interior streets, allow one of the permitted three establishments within the interior of the block to be located on the exterior of the block with a maximum of three establishments per lineal block and the total number allowed on the interior and exterior of the block not to exceed nine establishments. Potential implications of this alternative would be a slight increase in concentration of Class B private clubs and Class C taverns, however, this alternative does not change the maximum number of establishments per block presently allowed by ordinance. Legislative Document: The City Attorney's Office has prepared the necessary ordinance is ready for your action. Submitted by: " (12_ CRAIG El PETERSON Director l.f/ SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1989 (Amending Section 6.08.120 dealing with location restrictions for Class C beer licenses and Class B private clubs ) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 6.08. 120 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE DEALING WITH LOCATION RESTRICTIONS FOR CLASS C BEER LICENSES AND CLASS B PRIVATE CLUB LICENSES. WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, has held hearings before its own body and before the Planning Commission and has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to amend the location restrictions on Class C beer licenses and Class B private club licenses as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That Section 6.08. 120 is hereby amended to read as follows: 6.08.120 Location restrictions. A. * * * B. * * C. Exceptions. Class C beer establishments or Class B private clubs may be allowed on streets other than those outlined in subsection A of this section, and may be allowed within the interior of a block upon receiving approval from the mayor or his/her designee. Such approval shall be given only: 1 . After the mayor or his/her designee has received recommendations from the planning and zoning commission of the city and the city police department; and 2 . If the street shall be at least sixty feet in width, or, if within the interior of the block, the entrance to the establishment is from a courtyard or mall-like area with paved vehicular access and proper lighting; and 3 . If any addition of such requested establishment would not cause the number of Class C beer and Class B private club licensees to exceed nine such establishments located on the exterior and interior of any block, as defined in subsection Ala of this section The foregoing notwithstanding, no more than two such establishments may be located on any street located in the interior of any such block, and no more than three such establishments may be located within the interior of any such block; 4 . Subject to the provisions of this section, on those blocks within district A which do not have interior public streets, the interior block locations provided in subsection C( 3 ) above may be permitted on the exterior block face, provided that such relocation would not bring the total number of licensed establishments in excess of three per lineal block face, nor the total on the interior or exterior of the block in excess of nine licensed establishments. 5. After a public hearing has been held, with actual written notice having been given to the abutting property owners, and public notice having been given to the residents of the city thereof by at least one publication in a paper of general circulation in the county at least ten days before the hearing, stating the purpose, time, date and location of such hearing; and -2- 6 . A finding by the mayor or the mayor' s designee, after the holding of such hearing, that the proposed location for said establishment will not: a. Create an undue concentration in the number of Class C beer establishments or Class B private clubs, b. Materially interfere with the free flow of traffic, pedestrian or vehicular, c. Create an undue burden in controlling and policing illegal activities in the vicinity, and d. Create a nuisance to the community, .or e. Adversely affect the health, safety and morals of the residents of the city. D. * * * E. * * * SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER fir-'/L; -3- ALLEN C. JOHNSON MEMBERS: PLANNING DIRECTOR '�//��,,,�//��qe� ,yy�gg��,� N�7 RALPH BECKER SANDRA MARLER y 1 I 1 ) Q G1 t! V�oRpet�,�A' o-N THOINDY MAS A.REOMER LL SON SECRETARY `>�'tl. %8 LAVONE LIDDLE-GAMONAL EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES RICHARD J. HOWA MAYOR OF SALT LAKE CITY Planning and Zoning Commission RALPH P. NEILSON CITY ENGINEER 324 SOUTH STATE STREET. ROOM 200 GEORGE NICOLATUS CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 JOHN M. SCHUMANN CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL F. ITH STEPAN 535-7757 PETER VANALSTYNE KATHY WACKER April 18, 1989 Mr. Craig Peterson, Director Development Services 324 S. State, Suite 201 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re: Petition 400-668 - Dejavu Dear Craig: Attached please find Petition 400-668 by Mr. Joel D. Berrett on behalf of Club Dejavu at 407 South Church Street, requesting Salt Lake City to change the License Ordinance 6.08.120, Location Restrictions for a Class B private club. Salt Lake City Code Section 6.08.120 outlines criteria and location restrictions for establishments licensed with either a Class C beer license which allows the sale of draft beer or a Class B private club license which allows the sale of liquor and wine by the drink in a private setting. There are three districts; A, B and C, which identify geographical location • criteria for establishments with Class B private club or Class C beer licenses. Dejavu is located within District A which specifies that no more than two establishments may be located on any lineal block. A lineal block is defined as both sides of a major street between two intersecting major streets. Also, in the exceptions section up to 3 establishments may be located on streets within the interior of a block. However, the total number of Class B and Class C licensed establishments on the entire block may not exceed 9. Dejavu has been operating as a public restaurant with a State mini-bottle license and a Class B beer license which allows beer to be sold in its original container. The address for the building was issued on Church Street, however, Church Street was vacated by the City in 1954 and is considered a private right of way. The Cabana and the Manhattan are located on the north side of 400 South between State and Main Streets thus eliminating the possibility of locating any more private clubs on either side of 400 South without a change to the location criteria of the ordinance. The owners of the Cabana and the Manhattan have expressed their opposition to this requested change. We have not received acknowledgment of support or objections from any of the other surrounding property owners. The Downtown Master Plan and the R/UDAT study encourage more evening activity downtown and from a land use standpoint an ordinance change is worth consideration. City Departments have reviewed this petition twice. Engineering, Fire, Public Utilities, Transportation, and the Board of Health deal with projects on a site specific basis. The Police do not want to create an enforcement problem through a concentration of clubs in one location and have requested that land use not be the only consideration in changing this ordinance. (see attached letters) The planning staff identified the following possible changes to the location criteria in our request for comment. Alternative A: - Do not change existing ordinance. Alternative B: - Section A. 1.a. District A. - Amend the definition of a lineal block to one side of a major street. Potential implication of this alternative would be the doubling of Class B private clubs and Class C taverns on major streets. Alternative C: - Section C. Exceptions 3. - On those blocks which do not have interior streets, allow one of the permitted three establishments within the interior of the block to be located on the exterior of the block with a maximum of three establishments per lineal block and the total number allowed on the interior and exterior of the block not to exceed nine establishments. Potential implications of this alternative would be a slight increase in concentration of Class B private clubs and Class C taverns, however, this alternative does not change the maximum number of establishments per block presently allowed by ordinance. At its regular meeting on April 13, 1989 the Planning Commission reviewed this petition and voted to recommend to the Mayor that Section 6.08.120 of the Salt Lake City Code be amended as outlined in Alternative C above. Since ply, Allen C. John on, AICP Plannin Dire tor attachments cc:CP ACJ:jj • The address for the building was issued on Church Street, however, Church Street was vacated by the City in 1954 and is considered as a private right of way providing access to parking areas within the interior of the block. The Club Cabana and Club Manhattan are located on the north side of 400 South between State and Main Streets thus eliminating the possibility of locating any more private clubs on either side of 400 South without a change to the location criteria of the ordinance. The City Attorney has provided the following comments relating to the history behind the present ordinance. "The bar separation ordinance was adopted because of the City's experience that Class B private clubs and Class C beer licenses were substantially similar in operation, clientele and problem generation. The Class B private club designation was a legal mechanism to permit an establishment, which would otherwise have been a liquor dispensing establishment in other states, to legally do so in Utah. Enforcement circumstances may have changed recently; however, from a historic perspective our experience has been that Class B private clubs were very liberal in the methods by which memberships were granted and they operated very similarly to Class C taverns. There have been a number of enforcement and other litigation problems regarding these establishments but previous experience suggested that undue concentration of taverns (including Class B private club operations) had a deleterious impact on property values. Historically, the City had a numerical limit on the number of taverns which were permitted. This limit was removed and the land use restrictions and separation requirements substituted. This land • use approach prevented the trafficing in tavern licenses and allowed the marketplace to determine how many of these establishments would • be in the City. However, police control was through a dispersal system to avoid the adverse impacts of bar concentrations." ANALYSIS Salt Lake City Code Section 6.08.120 outlines criteria and location restrictions for establishments licensed with either a Class C beer license which allows the sale of draft beer or a Class B private club license which allows the sale of liquor and wine by the drink in a private setting. There are three districts; A, B and C, which identify geographical location criteria for establishments with Class B private club or Class C beer licenses. The Club Dejavu is located within District A which specifies that no more than two establishments may be located on any lineal block. A lineal block is defined as both sides of a major street between two intersecting major streets. SALT LAKE CITY PLANING CCM IESSICN STAFF REPORT PETITICN 400-668 CLUB LEJAVU LICENSE ORDINANCE CHANGE REQUEST OVERVIEW riPetition 400-668 is a request from 1i ! O Mr. Joel D. Berrett on behalf of the EXCHANGE PL. Club Dejavu requesting to change the zoning and development ordinances and regulations to permit Club Dejavu to I ri- operate as a private club at 407 South Church Street (400 South between State 400 SOUTH' and Main Streets) . This request requires 1 an amendment to the Business License , A section of the Salt Lake City Code NI Section 6.08.120 which specifies criteria `c I h- and location restrictions for establishments licensed with either a Class B private club , I ` license or a Class C beer license. w N� . . ' E a Initially, this petition was routed through the City Treasurer's office. However, after m --A 0 --i w review by the Treasurer's office and other City departments, it was determined that due • 2 to the potential land use impacts which would be created by a change to location restrictions 500 SOUTH for Class B private club and Class C tavern licenses this issue required a closer examination and review by the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND The Club Dejavu is located in the block between 400 and 500 South and State and Main Streets and is zoned Commercial C-4 which allows general businesses and commercial activities. The surrounding land uses are commercial with related parking areas. The Club Dejavu has been operating as a public restaurant with a State mini- bottle license and a Class B beer license which allows beer to be served in original containers at a restaurant (defined as a building within which there is served a variety of hot food for consumption on the premises and where more than sixty percent of the gross volume is derived from the sale of foods served) . When the building permit for renovation of the building was taken out approximately two years ago the owner was informed that the business would not qualify as a private club under the present City Ordinance. The Veterans of Foreign Wars Organization was located in the same location for many years. However, any nonconforming status was lost during the intervening years while the building was left vacant. Due to the recent problems which have developed with the transient population in the Central Business District a side issue which the Planning Commission may wish to consider is removing Class C taverns from the Commercial C-4 zoning district. RECNDATION Based on the goals and policies identified in the Downtown Master Plan and the R/UDAT study to encourage more evening activity downtown and from a land use standpoint an ordinance change is worth consideration. However, consideration must also be given to the issues identified by the Police Department and City Attorney to ensure that a change to the location criteria does not undermine the intent of the ordinance. Therefore, the staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the Mayor that Section 6.08.120 of the Salt Lake City Code be amended as outlined in Alternative C. • Alternative C: - Section C. Exceptions 3. - On those blocks which do not have interior streets, allow one of the permitted throe establishments within the interior of the block to be located on the exterior of the block with a maximum of three establishments per lineal block and the total number allowed on the interior and exterior of the block not to exceed nine establishments. Potential implications of this alternative would be a slight increase in concentration of Class B private clubs and Class C taverns, however, this alternative does not change the maximum number of establishments per block presently allowed by ordinance. March, 1989 Janice M. Jardine 6.08.120 Location Restrictions. A. The permissible locations of establishments licensed with either a Class C beer license, or a Class B private club license, or any combination thereof, shall be determined by geographical proximity, based upon the following criteria: 1. a. District A. There shall be no more than two establishments located on any lineal block. A "lineal block" means both sides of a major street between two intersecting major streets. For the purposes of this section, a corner establishment having abutting front footage on two major streets shall be included in the lineal block in which the establishment has the greatest number of front footage abutting the major street, or, if such abutting footage is equal, then the address originally filed with the city shall determine in which lineal block the establishment shall be located. b. District B. There shall be no more than one licensed establishment within a six hundred sixty foot radius of another licensed establishment. c. District C. There shall be no more than one licensed establishment within two thousand feet of any other licensed establishment. 2. All major streets and districts will be those designated on official City Map No. 19372, a copy of which shall be on file in the office of the city recorder. All such establishments holding a Class C beer or a Class B private club license must be located so as to front on a major street or be within a building with the main entrance to such building fronting on such major street. B. No Class C beer establishment an no Class B private club may be licensed or operate under the provisions of the Salt Lake City Code which is in close proximity to a public park, public elementary, junior high or high school, or a church, without having first received approval from the mayor or his/her designee. Such approval shall be given only after: 1. The mayor or his/her designee has received recommendations regarding such an establishment from the Manning and zoning emission of the city and the city police department; and 2. A public hearing has been held, with actual written notice having been given, where applicable, to the parks superintendent, school superintendent or to the church, and to the city and the residents thereof by at least one publication in a paper of general circulation in the county at least ten days before the hearing stating the purpose, time, date and location of such hearing; and 3. A finding by the mayor or his/her designee that the proposed location will not materially interfere with the activities and functions of such parks or school, or interfere with church worship or church related activities. For the purposes of this section, a public park or public elementary, junior high or high school or church which is located six hundred or more feet from the proposed establishment shall not be considered to be in close proximity to such establishment and no notices or hearings need be given or held prior to the granting of a Class C beer license or Class B private club license. 4. The applicant shall pay an additional sum of sixty dollars to cover the cost of advertising the hearing. The fee shall be paid before which hearing shall be set or advertised. C. Exceptions. Class C beer establishments or Class B private clubs may be allowed on streets other than those outlined in subsection A of this section, and may be allowed within the interior of a block upon receiving approval from the mayor/0 his/her designee. Such approval shall be given only: fit/ 1. After the mayor or his/her designee has received recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City and the city police department; and 2. If the street shall be at least sixty feet 'in width, or, if within the interior of the block, the entrance to the establishment is from a courtyard or mall-like area with paved vehicular access and proper lighting; and 3. If any addition of such requested establishment would not cause the number of Class C beer and Class B private club licensees to exceed nine such establishments located on the exterior and interior of any block, as defined in subsection A.l.a. of this section. The foregoing notwithstanding, no more than two such establishments may be located on any street located in the interior of any such block, and no more than three such establishments may be located within the interior of any such block; - ,±JLL C— +-4e. - On those blocks which do not have interior streets, allow one of the permitted three establishments within the interior of the block to be located on the exterior of the block with a maximum of three establishments per lineal block and the total number allowed on the interior and exterior of the block not to exceed nine establishments. Detent.i.61-jApillow Gf this altcr-aa a sl e101 asrcersc in eonscntr 4. After a public hearing has been held, with actual written notice having been given to the abutting property owners, and public notice having been given to the residents of the city thereof by at least one publication in a paper of general circulation in the county at least ten days before the hearing, stating the purpose, time, date and location of such hearing; and 5. A finding by the mayor or the mayor's designee, after the holding of such hearing, that the proposed location for said establishment will not: a. Create an undue concentration in the number of Class C beer establishments of Class B private clubs, b. Materially interfere with the free flow of traffic pedestrian or vehicular, c. Create an undue burden in controlling and policing illegal activities in the vicinity, and d. Create a nuisance to the community, or e. Adversely affect the health, safety and morals of the residents of the city. D. Prior Location. The provisions of this section shall in no way affect the rights of the present licensees to continue their operations so long as their licenses remain in good standing and continue to have their licenses reissued as provided by law until revoked or terminated for any reason. E. Zoning Restrictions. Notwithstanding any of the provisions of subsection A of this section, all such Class C beer or Class B private club establishments must be located within Commercial C-3 Districts or less restrictive zoning districts or in an Research/Development R-D District as an attendant use in a conference center. (Ord. 2-88 & 1, 1988; Ord. 34-87 & 11, 1987: prior code & 19-2-19) . 6.08.120 6.08.120 Location restrictions. I. The mayor or his/her designee has received A. The permissible locations of establish- recommendations regarding such an establish- ments licensed with either a Class C beer license, ment from the planning and zoning commission or a Class B private club license,or any combina- of the city and the city police department: and tion thereof,shall be determined by geographical 2 A public hearing has been held. with actual proximity, based upon the following criteria: written notice having been given, where applica- 1. a. District A. There shall be no more than ble. to the parks superintendent, school superin- tendent or to the church, and to the city and the two establishments located on any lineal block. residents thereof by at least one publication in a A "lineal block" means both sides of a major streetpaper of general circulation in the county at least between two intersecting major streets. For ten days before the hearing stating the purpose, the purposes of this section, a corner establish- time, date and location of such hearing; and ment having abutting front footage on two major 3. A finding by the mayor or his/her designee streets shall be included in the lineal block in that the proposed location will not materially which the establishment has the greatest number interfere with the activities and functions of such of front footage abutting the major street, or, if parks or school, or interfere with church worship such abutting footage is equal, then the address or church-related activities. For the purposes of originally filed with the city shall determine in this section, a public park or public elementary, which lineal block the establishment shall be junior high or high school or church which is located. located six hundred or more feet from the pro- b. District B.There shall be no more than one posed establishment shall not be considered to be licensed establishment within a six hundred- in close proximity to such establishment and no notices or hearings need be given or held prior to sixty-foot radius of another licensed establish- the granting of a Class C beer license or Class B ment. private club license. c. District C.There shall be no more than one 4. The applicant shall pay an additional sum licensed establishment within two thousand feet ofsixty dollars to cover the cost of advertising the of any other licensed establishment. hearing.The fee shall be paid before such hearing 2. All major streets and districts will be those shall be set or advertised. designated on official City Map No. 19372, a C. Exceptions.Class C beer establishments or copy of which shall be on file in the office of the Class B private clubs may be allowed on streets city recorder. All such establishments holding a other than those outlined in subsection A of this Class C beer or a Class B private club license must section. and may be allowed within the interior be located so as to front on a major street or be of a block upon receiving approval from the within a building with the main entrance to such mayor or his/her designee. Such approval shall building fronting on such major street. be given only: B. No Class C beer establishment and no 1. After the mayor or his/her designee has received recommendations from the planning Class B nonprofit club may be licensed or oper- and zoning commission of the city and the city ate under the provisions of the Salt Lake City police department: and Code which is in close proximity to a public park. 2. If the street shall be at least sixty feet in public elementary.junior high or high school. or width, or. if within the interior of the block, the a church, without having first received approval entrance to the establishment is from a courtyard from the mayor or his/her designee. Such or mall-like area with paved vehicular access and approval shall be given only after: proper lighting; and (Salt Lake (ii. I.88) 292 6.08.120 3. If any addition of such requested establish- establishments must be located within Commer- ment would not cause the number of Class C beer cial C-3 districts or less-restrictive zoning dis- and Class B private club licensees to exceed nine tricts or in an R-D district as an attendant use in a such establishments located on the exterior and conference center. (Ord. 2-88 § 1. 1988; Ord. interior of any block, as defined in subsection 34-87 § 11, 1987: prior code § 19-2-19) Ala of this section. The foregoing notwithstand- ing, no more than two such establishments may 6.08.130 Applications—Review by chief of be located on any street located in the interior of police. any such block, and no more than three such All applications filed in accordance with the establishments may be located within the inte- provisions of this chapter shall be referred to the rior of any such block; chief of police for inspection and report. The 5After a public hearing has been held, with chief of police shall, within ten days after receiv- actual written notice having been given to the ing such application, make report to the mayor abutting property owners,and public notice hay- or the mayor's designee of the general reputation ing been given to the residents of the city thereof and character of the persons who habitually fre- by at least one publication in a paper of general quent such place;the nature and kind of business circulation in the county at least ten days before conducted at such place by the applicant or by the hearing, stating the purpose, time, date and any other person or by the applicant at any other location of such hearing; and place; whether such place is or has been con- ` '. A finding by the mayor or the mayor's ducted in a lawful,quiet and orderly manner;the designee, after the holding of such hearing, that nature and kind of entertainment, if any, at such the proposed location for said establishment will place;whether gambling is or has been permitted not: on the premises or by the applicant at any other a. Create an undue concentration in the place; and the proximity of such premises to any number ofClass C beer establishments or Class B school or church. The chief of police shall also private clubs, add to such report his/her recommendation as to b. Materially interfere with the free flow of whether or not the application should be granted. traffic. pedestrian or vehicular, (Prior code § 19-2-12) c. Create an undue burden in controlling and policing illegal activities in the vicinity, and 6.08.140 Application—Review by health d. Create a nuisance to the community, or department. e. Adversely affect the health,safety and mor- All applications filed in accordance with this als of the residents of the city. chapter shall be referred to the health depart- D. Prior Location.The provisions of this sec- ment which shall inspect all premises to be tion shall in no way affect the rights of the present licensed to assure sanitary compliance with the licensees to continue their operations. so long as laws of the state, the ordinances of the city, and their licenses remain in good standing. and con- the rules and regulations of the health depart- tinue to have their licenses reissued as provided ment. If the premises and all equipment used in by law until revoked or terminated for any rea- the storage. distribution or sale of beer fulfill all son. such sanitary requirements, the health depart- E. Zoning Restrictions. Notwithstanding any ment shall issue a permit to the licensee,a copy of of the provisions of subsection A of this section. which shall be attached to the application for all such Class C beer or Class B private club license. (Prior code § 19-2-13) 293 (Salt Lake City1-41 'o MAR 7 1989 ROGER F. CUTLER SALT A\ �V T t1 , �h® ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS CITY ATTORNEY w� �d RAY L. MONTGOMERY STEVEN W. ALLRED LAW DEPARTMENT GREG R. HAWKINS LARRY V. SPENDLOVE DEPUTv CITY ATTORNEY 324 SOUTH STATE STREET, FIFTH FLOOR F3RUCE R. BAIRD CHERYL D. LUKE SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 FRANK M. NAKAMURA CITY PROSECUTOR (801) 535-7788 ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS FAX (801) 535-7640 DONALD L. GEORGE CECELIA M. ESPENOZA RICHARD G. HAMP GLEN A. COOK March 6, 1989 Allen C. Johnson, Director Planning & Zoning 324 South Street, Room 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Re: Petition No. 400-668 - Club Dejavu Dear Allen: On March 6, 1989, Roger Cutler referred your letter of March 1, 1989, to Joel D. Berrett to me to clear up a small ambiguity. Our office wishes to make clear that Roger Cutler' s letter to you of January 30, 1989, concerning this petition did not constitute a negative policy recommendation. As you know, we generally do not comment on the policy implications of petitions such as this. As Roger Cutler' s letter makes clear, we are not making any policy recommendation. Any such inference in the Planning Commission' s Staff Report is therefore not correct. Roger' s letter made clear, in its concluding paragraph, the purpose for which it was written: "I merely write this letter to suggest that an appropriate evaluation be made of the historic context of this ordinance and to appropriately include police enforcement experience, as it relates to these planning and enforcement relationships. " Allen C. Johnson March 6, 1989 Page -2- If you have any questions about this petition please feel free to contact me directly. Sincerely, Z///r- CE R. BAIRD Assistant City Attorney BRB:rc cc: Mike Zuhl Craig Peterson Chief Chabries Buzz Hunt Joel Berrett ROGER F. CUTLER ST�RAKE' a i ITY GOPORATI0N ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS C T' ATTORNEY RAY L. MONTGOMERY CHERYL D. LUKE LAW DEPARTMENT GREG R. HAWKINS CITY PROSECUTOR 324 SOUTH STATE, FIFTH FLOOR L STEVARRY N.EN W.. ALLRED E TEVED SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 BRUCE R. BAIRD (801) 535-7788 FRANK M. NAKAMURA FAX (801) 535-7640 ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS DONALD L. GEORGE CECELIA M. ESPENOZA RICHARD G. HAMP January 30, 1989 GLEN A. COOK Allen Johnson Planning & Zoning - 324 South State • Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Re: Petition 400-668 Separation of bar ordinance. Dear Allen: I am in receipt of your letter to Chief Chabries dated January 25, 1989 and write briefly to provide you some institutional memory on this subject. The bar separation ordinance was adopted because of the City' s experience that Class B private clubs and Class C beer licenses were substantially similar in operation, clientele and problem generation. As you may recall, the Class B private club designation was a legal mechanism to address the liquor by the drink issue. In reality, it was a legal mechanism to permit an establishment, which would otherwise have been a liquor dispensing establishment in other states, to legally do so in Utah. Enforcement circumstances may have changed recently; however, from a historic perspective our experience has been that Class B private clubs were very liberal in the methods by which memberships were granted and they operated very similarly to Class C taverns. There have been a number of enforcement and other litigation problems regarding these establishments but previous experience suggested that undue concentration of taverns ( including Class B private club operations) had a deleterious impact on property values. They tended to turn an area into a bar zone, with all of its Allen Johnson January 30, 1989 Page -2- attendant problems . For example, such a zone increased alcohol related problems, prostitution, obscenity--nude or sexually oriented performances, gambling and other influences which deteriorated the perception of the neighborhood and induced other more traditional businesses to vacate the area. Historically, the City had a numerical limit on the number of taverns which were permitted. This limit was removed and the land-use restrictions and separation requirements substituted. This land-use approach prevented the trafficing in tavern licenses and allowed the marketplace to determine how many of these establishments would be in the City. However, police control was through a dispersal system to avoid the adverse impacts of bar concentrations . Your letter does not appear to evaluate or consider the teachings of previous enforcement experience or the root rationale behind the existing system. By that comment, I do not mean to suggest that circumstances have not changed by virtue of modifications in the Utah liquor statutes or because of changes in the current operation of Class B establishments. In fact, I am aware of more stringent enforcement of membership card rules. I merely write this letter to suggest that an appropriate evaluation be made of the historic context of this ordinance and to appropriately include police enforcement experience, as it relates to these planning and enforcement relationships. Historically concentration of bars has been acknowledged to have land-use implications in the same sense that concentrations of pornographic outlets had done. Sincerely, ' ROGER F. CUTLER City Attorney RFC:cc SALT "" � GfTY ;ORPORA 'ION° • =;, �. �..oiIC fy PDij PQUCE DEPAR111r1ENT MIKE CHABRIES CHIEF OF POLICE 315 EAST 200 SOUTH TELEPHONE 799-3000 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 February 1 , 1989 Allen C. Johnson Planning Director Department of Development Services 324 South State Room 200 Salt Lake City, Utah, 84111 Re: Petition 400-668 - Club Dejavu - Ordinance change request Dear Mr . Johnson, The views Lt . Kinnersley and Detective G. Smith have given with regard to the petition by the Club Dejavu reflect the Police Departments views with respect to all law. We are charged with the enforcement of law, and will do our utmost to provide service in that regard to the citizens of Salt Lake City. If in the eyes of the law makers it would be beneficial to provide more taverns per block in the Central City area, then it will be our job to enforce those laws , as well as , the residual fallout from increasing the number of taverns/clubs by 50%. There are problems which immediately come to mind with respect to current problems with the number of taverns/clubs in the immediate vicinity. The first is the recent series of meetings by the businesses between 3rd and 4th South on Main and the business owners insistence on the revocation of the licenses for the Delmar and the Desert Lounges . An increase in the allowable number of taverns/clubs in the area is going to have results similar to throwing gasoline on an out of control fire. In your letter you address the land use issues , but there are impacts on the surrounding area which have nothing to do with the physical location , such as an increase in the number of DUI drivers , and the potential for an increase incidents similar to those on Main Street . Your letter indicates there is not a significant difference between a restaurant with a beer and mini bottle license and a private club. There is a requirement that a restaurant receive 60% of it ' s revenue from the sale of food and a maximum of 40% from the sales of alcoholic beverages . The clientele of a restaurant is at the establishment to eat and have a cocktail service pursuant to the meal . The clientele of a Club is at the establishment to consume alcoholic beverages and have a cocktail pursuant to drinking . We feel this is a very significant difference . Please keep in mind that as the numbers of club/tavern licenses increase, it becomes necessary for the Police Department to increase the size of our staff to handle the increased problems created by the addition of drinking establishments, and since we have not been allowed to increase budget for several years , the level of service we provide will of necessity decline. We , again, ask that land use not be the only consideration in the change of an ordinance or the granting of a variance, and we would not propose a change in the ordinance , but we will continue to do our best no matter what the outcome. Mike Chabries Chief of Police. Sincerely , Capt . M. R. Frisbey Commander SID cc: Major R Nievaard Janice Jardine SALT' r ro ITY` C ,RP R TI if INS 'aA varw•-.a w'Za:. �t�srnrv.49 x u.al .,•.� N .. o V�1 M POJIC IE' DEPARMENT MIKE CHABRIES r ..„......,..-r~� CHIEF OF POLICE 315 EAST 200 SOUTH TELEPHONE 799-3000 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 December 6, 1988 Ms. Janice Jardine Planning and Zoning 324 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 RE: Petition 400-668 - Club Dejavu - Ordinance change request Dear Ms. Jardine: After discussing your request with my immediate supervisor, Lt. R. Kinnersley, it would be Special Investigations Division's position to support and maintain the current ordinance as it is written. Any other comments would best be directed to the Chief's Office for recommendation. Sincerely, ie t. g Smith Spec Investigations Division GS/sj • ALLEN C. JOHNSON a MEMBERS: PLANNING DIRECTOR •- -' CINDY CROMER SANDRA MARLER SALT', LAKEGITY(GORPORATIONf LAVONEMLIDDLE-GAMONAL SECRETARY -+a®.• ® ��LA , w-r ��-r-.�.••••• -DJ • EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A HOWA RALPH HARD LPH P. NEILSON MAYOR OF SALT LAKE CITY Planning and Zoning Commission GEORGE NICOLATUS CITY ENGINEER 324 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 200 JOHN M. SCHUMANN CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 F. KEITH STEPAN CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL PETER VY WA CKER E 535-7 January 25, 1989 Mike Chabries Chief of Police Salt Lake City Police Department 315 East 200 South Sal: Lake City, UT 84111 Re: Petition 400-668 - Club Dejavu - Ordinance change request Dear Chief Chabries: Club Dejavu has petitioned the City co change an ordinance which restricts the location of private clubs. We have been in contact with Lt. R. Kinnersley and Dec. Greg Smith from your Special Investigations Division for review of this petition. They have indicated that it is the Division's position to support and maintain the current ordinance as it is written. We would like to support your position concerning this petition buc unfortunately are finding it difficult from a pure land use perspective. It would be very helpful if your staff could expand or further explain the Police Department's position. It would also assist my office in our analysis if you would provide comments on the rationale behind grouping Class C beer licenses and Class B private club licenses together, using a geographical location as the criteria for the issuance of such licenses, and the options outlined on page two of this letter. Once Planning has formulated a recommendation the petition will be heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Mayor. Club Dejavu is located on 4th South between State and Main where there are currently two established private clubs, Club Cabana and The Manhattan Club. The location restrictions are contained in the licensing ordinances, specifically Section 6.08.120 which limits the number of Class B private club licenses and Class C beer licenses to a total of two establishments on a "lineal block" which is defined as both sides of the street. We have examined the request based on land use issues, ie. parking, traffic circulation and infrastructure needs and have determined that- from a planning standpoint there is noc a significant difference between a private club and a restaurant with a mini bottle license. Dejavu is presently operating as a restaurant with a mini bottle and beer license. Page 2 Police Chief Mike Chabries January 25, 1989 Based on the support expressed by the City Council and the Mayor for the R/UDAT study which calls for a "lightening up" of ordinances regulating uses in the downtown and the creation of more of an evening life in the downtown my staff has explored some modifications to the existing ordinance. Some options identified are: - a change to the definition of a lineal block, - a change in the number of establishments located on a lineal block, - allowing the flexibility of the location of the permitted three establishments within the interior of the block to be located on the exterior • of the block as long as the total number of establishments allowed on the exterior and interior of the block does not exceed nine such establishments. This will not increase the number of establishments presently allowed in any one block, it would change the location or spacing criteria. I appreciate your consideration of this request and would request that we receive a response from your office by February 3, 1989. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me or Janice Jardine. Sincere; , Allen C. Johnson, AICP Planning Director attachments cc: Roger Cutler City Attorney Janice Jardine Long Range Planning ACJ:JJ LAW OFFICES BOTTIJM & WELLS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 323 SOUTH 800 EAST SUITE 150 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84102 JOSEPH H. BOTTUM• (801) 538-0700 FAX (801) 538-0705 EDWARD T.WELLS JOEL 0. BERRETT" 'ALSO ADMITTED IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA p(� "ALSO ADMITTED IN IDAHO August 19, 1988 Honorable Palmer DePaulis Mayor, Salt Lake City c/o Department of Development Services 324 South State, Second Floor Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 ATTN: LuAnn Fawcett The undersigned, on behalf of Club Dejavu, hereby petitions the Honorable Mayor Palmer DePaulis and the City Council of Salt Lake City to change the zoning and development ordinances and regulations to permit Club Dejavu to operate a private club at 407 South Church Street (44 East 400 South) located in Salt Lake City, Utah. The interior and exterior of the premises has been completely renovated and it is felt that a private club would upgrade the area. DATED August 19, 1988 . \) /J )6212 Joo l! D. Berrett (// DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CRAIG E. PETERSON 324 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 201 DIRECTOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 - 535-7777 TO: Salt Lake City Council May 31, 1989 RE: Petition No. 400-710 submitted by Thelma and Gilbert Iker. Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on July 18, 1989 at 6:30 p.m. to discuss Petition No. 400-710 submited by.Gilbert and Thelma Iker. The petitioners are requesting Salt Lake City to rezone a portion of their property at 1307 South 900 West from Residential "R-2" to Business "B-3". The rezoning will accommodate the expansion of their office facilities on the site. Availability of Funds: Not applicable Discussion and Background: The rezoning request is consistent with the Westside Community Master Plan goals. The petition has been reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Legislative Documents: The City Attorney's Office has prepared the necessary ordinance is ready for your action. Submitted by: CRAIG El PETERSCN Director lf/ SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1989 ( Rezoning property located at 1307 South 900 West from Residential "R-2" to Business "B-3" pursuant to Petition No. 400-710-89 ) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21 . 14.020 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING AND FIXING OF BOUNDARIES OF USE DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, in response to the rezoning petition initiated by Gilbert and Thelma Iker, No. 400-710-89, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, has held public hearings before its own body and before the Planning Commission, and has taken into consideration citizen testimony, filing and demographic details of the area and the Master Plan as part of its deliberation. Pursuant to these deliberations, the Council has concluded that the proposed change of zoning for the property located at 1307 South 900 West from Residential "R-2" to Business "B-3" is appropriate for the development of the community in that area; THEREFORE, The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, hereby adopts the following amendments to the Use District provisions of Title 21 . Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That the Use District Map, as adopted by Section 21 . 14 . 020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries of Use Districts, be, and the same hereby is AMENDED to read as follows: Sec. 21. 14.020. Boundaries of Districts - Use District Map Adopted. That the following-described parcel of real property in Salt Lake City, Utah, presently zoned Residential "R-2" is hereby rezoned Business "B-3" and the Use District Map is amended accordingly: Si Beginning at the Northwest corner of Block 5, 5 Acre ,�. Plat B, Big Field Survey thence East 221. 69 feet, or- ' /' thence South 188 . 1 feet, thence West 66 feet, thence fpl" 1 ' North 89 . 1 feet, thence West 160.26, thence North 99 feet along the east right of way line of 900 West to the point of beginning. SECTION 2 . EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective upon its first publication Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989 . CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s Action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER BRB:pp -2- ALLEN C. JOHNSON MEMBERS: PLANNING DIRECTOR RALPH BECKER SANDRA MARLER »= ` ��:ITT�Y� P I A CINDY CROMER IS SAL, 1 A a 1JIfi 1 ,v II31�'1 ©` )! V THOMAS A. ELLISON SECRETARY � �� a�� LAVONE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS RICHARD J AIDDJ.. HOWA MAYOR OF SALT LAKE CITY Planning and Zoning Commission RALPH P. NEILSON CITY ENGINEER 324 SOUTH STATE STREET. ROOM 200 GEORGE NICOLATUS CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER SALT LAKE CITY. UTAH 84111 JOHN M. SCHUMANN CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL F. KEITH STEPAN 535-7757 PETER VANALSTYNE April 25, 1989 KATHY WACKER Craig E. Peterson, Director Community & Economic Development Salt Lake City, Utah Dear Craig: Attached you will find Petition 400-710 by Gilbert and Thelma Iker requesting the city to rezone a portion of their property at 1307 South 900 West from Residential "R-2" to Business "B-3". The rezoning will accommodate the expansion of their office facilities on the site. The Planning Staff evaluated the request and found it consistent with the Westside Community Master Plan goals. Upon additional research, the staff believed there is merit to expand the request to include additional properties to the south to California Avenue. The details are explained in the attached staff report. On Thursday, April 13, 1989 the Planning Commission held an informal hearing at 6:00 pm to receive comment from the public concerning this rezoning. Minutes of that hearing are attached. The Planning Commission generally concurred with the staff recommendation to expand the rezoning, however, they desire some additional study of the northwest corner of 1300 South and 900 West to rezone that corner to a residential zone as it is presently used. Therefore, the Planning Commission held action on the expanded rezoning. At the conclusion of the informal hearing, the Planning Commission moved to recommend approval of Petition 400-710 to rezone a portion of property from Residential "R-2" to Business "B-3" at 1307 South 900 West Strcct. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council hold a public hearing and approve the rezoning request. Respectf lly submitted, ---- Allen C 'John on AICP Planni Dir tor attachments ., • (h. ALLEN C. JOHNSON MEMBERS: PLANNING DIRECTOR RALPH BECKER SANDRA MARLER SAW W t +T CINDY CROMER Al r"� at jllY( RP�t Il.© 1 THOMAS A. ELLISON SECRETARY "•��'� ��►��1 `..��r� `.IV��r.�I�a�..��.,►..► DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LAVONE LIDDLE•GAMONAL EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS: RICHARD J. HOWA MAYOR OF SALT LAKE CITY Planning and Zoning Commission RALPH P. NEILSON CITY ENGINEER 324 SOUTH STATE STREET. ROOM 200 GEORGE NICOLATUS CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER SALT LAKE CITY. UTAH 84111 JOHN M. SCHUMANN CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL 535-7757 F. KEITH STEPAN PETER VANALSTYNE KATHY WACKER NOTICE OF INFORMAL HEARING * s 2 * * SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION * * * * * The Salt Lake City Planning and Zoning Commission is currently reviewing Petition number 400-710 by Gilbert and Thelma Iker requesting to rezone property located 1307 South 900 West. The rezoning request is for approximately . 09 acres to be. rezoned from the existing Residential R-2 to a Business B-3 classification. The Planning Staffs recommendation is to include additional property ( total of approximately 1. 27 acres ) to be within the B-3 zoning Classification as indicated on the attached map. The zoning change would allow the expansion of office facilities on the petition site. As part of their consideration the Planning and Zoning Commission is holding an informal public hearing. During this hearing the Planning staff will present information on the petitioners request. Anyone desiring to address the Planning and Zoning Commission relating to this request will be given the opportunity to speak. The informal hearing will be held: DATE: Thursday April 13, 1989 - I . . , , , , TIME: 6: 00 P. M. 1300 SOUTH LOCATION: Room 203, Salt Lake City Hall • 324 South State Street -P,eltto 4„ Salt Lake City, Utah —•. { �- —' -1 NORTH CALIFORNIA AVENUE Please share this information with your neighbors. If you have question relating to this proposal, please attend the meeting or call Bill Wright during the 8: 00 A. M. to 5: 00 P. M. office hours. Allen C. Johnson, AICP Planning Director Salt Lake City Planning and Zoning Commission Petition 400-710 by Gilbert and Thelma Iker OVERVIEW The petitioner is requesting that the city rezone a portion of the property at 1307 South 900 West from Residential R-2 to a Business B-3 classification. The petition site is 165 ' in depth and the existing B-3 zoning only extends across 125 ' of the depth of the property. If granted, the zoning change would facilitate the expansion of office facilities on the petition site. PetitionArea .�._.,., . fa _ AV in. h W • • . .0 O . 0 3 , 11.16 3 M 1 ILO O O • O • 11!•^ ••SMUT• •-1 TS/4 6 VI0000Prire A !(dr) t,Tw BACKGROUND The petitioner has requested that property now used for parking and open space for an existing office building be rezoned to allow for the expansion of that office building. This portion of the petition site was granted a conditional use to allow parking in a residential zone for the adjacent office building. The surrounding area adjacent to the petition site is generally occupied by existing single family homes, neighborhood businesses and one nonconformingly located business . On April 19 , 1982 the Salt Lake City Board of Adjustment granted Case 8909 which allowed the petitioner to construct a parking lot in a residential R-2 zone. This lot is located immediately East of the office building which was also constructed in 1982. ANALYSIS The petitioners have requested that only the east 40 feet of their lot be changed from a residential R-2 classification to Business B-3 . The staff has observed some merit in expanding this request to include all the property from the east line of the petitioners parking lot to 900 West and south to California Avenue. After discussing this with the petitioner , it was agreed that while this is area is substantially larger than what is requested in this petition, it could provide the flexibility to instigate additional reinvestment and development in the area. .r.',is:' • ••— EXISTING LAND USE I i . 11 1 1 I 1 1 1 II i • 1300 SOUTH i . Petition Area J t : • I NORTH OFFICE Z o Y ~ a -_ U) SINGLE FAMILY HOME A. W • J_ ••—�.. — 1 OFFICE I STOfAGE I - j .• __ � • SINGLE FAMILY HOME I - o SINGLE FAMILY z_ Qr _I904nnEDl ..J HOME • `^ • -' • VACANT CALIFORNIA AVENUE • • ___ PETITIONERS ZONING •" — . REQUEST I 1 • It 1 , 1 I t 1 i 1 1 1300 SOUTH 125=-1• REQUESTED �, /� 1/4 . iST[NG \� R-2 Z^oJningt I g Zoriin�;, — NORTH • o T • • CALIFORNIA AVENUE Preliminary analysis of the land use of the area shows that the office building built in 1982 was the last substantial investment made in this neighborhood. Single family homes directly to the south of the petition area have substantially served out their useful lifetimes yet two of these homes are occupied by long time residents of the community. Any efforts for redevelopment in this area should be sensitive to the needs of these residents. Other structures in the area include a burned and boarded single family home and a nonconforming office and storage building which appears to be accessory to the petitioners main office building. Last year the city completed the reconstruction of 900 West Street which involved the widening of the right-of-way. At this specific location, the existing homes south of the petitioner ' s property now are located within a few feet of the public sidewalk. The Westside Community Master Plan Update acknowledges the properties between 1300 South and California Avenue on the east side of 900 West Street as transitional. Neighborhood oriented business locating at the northeast corner of California Avenue and 900 West Streets is the recommnedation of staff in that Master Plan Update. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the concept of Petition 400-710 and expand the zoning change to include the area immediately to the South to California Avenue and West to 900 West. This recommendation is based on evidence that the proposed development would generally be in keeping with the master plan now being developed for the area and appropriately market the property for reinvestment and redevelopment of this neighborhood. _ STAFF RECOMMENDED- ZONING CHANGE 11 , , , , , , ( ; 1300 SOUTH --{ NOI=.TH r4 r cn — I CALIFORNIA AVENUE • Cristian A. Schulz . City Planner II PC MINUTES April 14, 1989 Page 8 OTHER BUSINESS Utah Heritage Foundation Meeting Mr. Schumann stated that he had received a notice from Mr. James W. McPhearson of the Utah Heritage Foundation, that a meeting will be held April•14, 1989 from 10:00 a.m. until Noon in the Governor's Board Room at the Utah State Capitol Building for any of the Planning Commission members interested in attending. The purpose of the meeting is to review the possibility of the Utah Heritage Foundation doing a "Main Street Program." Mr. Schumann explained that this program would basically be another master plan for the Downtown area. Mr. Schumann requested someone from the Planning Staff attend this meeting and report on it to the Planning Commission. R/UDAT STUDY • Mr. Schumann stated that he is becoming increasingly concerned about the comments he hears referring to the R/UDAT study as the officially adopted Master Plan for Salt Lake City. Mr. Schumann said he feels a statement needs to go out from the Planning Commission informing the public that the R/UDAT study is NOT the official Master Plan for the City. Mr. Van Alstyne moved to have a statement issued explaining that the R/UDAT study is not the official Master Plan for the City, but that portions of it are being considered as suggestions for the Master Plan. Mr. Nicolatus seconded the motion. Mr. Howa inquired how this statement would be made. Mr. Johnsen responded that a letter to Mr. Craig Peterson would be drafted for Mr. Schumann's signature. Mr. Van Alstyne suggested that the letter be sent to the R/UDAT committees. Mr. Schumann asked if that suggestion was included in the motion. Mr. Van Alstyne responded in the affirmative. Mr. Nicolatus accepted the suggestion to the second; all voted "Aye." The motion passes. • PETTTICNS INFORMAL HEARING AT 6:00 p.m. - Petition No. 400-710, Gilbert and Thelma Iker recuesting Salt Lake City to rezone property located at 1307 South 900 West from Residential "R-2" to Business "B-3." Mr. Ellison disqualified himself from this matter due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Wright presented the staff report stating that the petitioners have only requested that the east 40 feet of their lot be changed from a Residential R-2 classification to Business B-3. Mr. Wright added that the staff has observed some merit in expanding this request to include all of the property from the east line of the petitioner's parking lot to 900 West and south to California Avenue. Mr. Wright explained that the Staff's position on this expansion had been discussed with the petitioners and they are in agreement with the expansion. PC MINUTES April 14, 1989 Page 9 Mr. Wright stated that the Westside Community Master Plan Update acknowledges the properties between 1300 South and California Avenue on the east side of 900 West Street as transitional. This master plan recommends neighborhood- oriented businesses for the northeast corner of this area. Mr. Wright stated that the staff is recommending two alternatives to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1) approval of the petitioner's request on the east forty feet of their property, and 2) approval of the staff's recommendations for expansion on the rezoning request to include the area immediately to the south to California Avenue and West to 900 West. Mr. Wright also stated that a community council meeting had been held and they are in favor of the approval of this petition. Mr. Schumann asked if the community council was in favor of approving staff's recommendation on expansion of the petitioner's request. Mr. Wright responded in the affirmative. Ms. Cromer stated that her understanding of the residential parcels on the northwest corner of the intersection were currently zoned B-3 but that rezoning them to their current use is being considered. Mr. Wright said that was correct. He added that the 1974 Master Plan suggested rezoning according to use. Ms. Cromer then inquired as to the time frame on this. Mr. Wright stated.that no petition has been submitted on this but that it could be initiated by the community council, by the property owners or even by the Planning Commission. Ms. Cromer asked if it would be possible to .initiate this without the community council having to come up with the filing fees. Mr. Johnson responded that there were two ways this could be handled. One would be to wait until the master plan is updated. At that time, the Planning Commission could recommend to the City Council that the zoning in that area be changed. Mr. Johnson stated that a motion could be piggy-backed to this petition. He suggested that before doing that, however, the scope of this hearing be broadened to notice those property owners. Mr. Johnson stated that another option would be to have the community council file the petition requesting the rezoning. Ms. Cromer then inquired if they would have to file the petition filing fcc. Mr. Johnson responded in the affirmative. Mr. Schumann asked if proper notification had been sent out to property owners in the area since staff was making a recommendation somewhat different from the petitioner's request. Mr. Wright responded in the affirmative. Mr. Wheelwright informed the Planning Commission that two years ago when this area was under consideration for another matter, the Traffic Division had requested that the remnant parcel along California Avenue, going east from 900 West for approximately 165 feet, be retained in order to prevent driveway across to California Avenue. Mr. Bob Jacobi, representing the petitioners, stated that the Ikers would be happy with either their request being approved or the staff's recommendation for the expanded rezoning being approved. Mr. Schumann opened the hearing to the public and asked if anyone wished to speak to the Planning Commission. PC MINUTES • April 14, 1989 Page 10 Ms. Sandra Richter, representing the owner of the property directly south of the Iker property, stated that the lady who owns this property has never received notice of the community council meetings on this matter. Ms. Richter added that this lady is not interested in selling her property or moving. Ms. Richter added that the lady who owns the property has her invalid sister, who is on dialysis, living with her and they have no intention of ever leaving this home. Ms. Richter further stated that these ladies cannot afford to live elsewhere and are uncomfortable with the pressure they feel Mr. Iker is exerting on them to sell. Ms. Cheryl Tulius, 1380 South 900 West, stated that she is opposed to this request for rezoning. Mr. Schumann stated that the Planning Staff had received a telephone call from Mr. Gordon Wesemann, owner of the property at 1325 South 900 West stating that he would be unable to attend the Planning Commission meeting but added that he • is in favor of the rezoning.. Ms. Richter pointed out that Mr. Wesemann owns the boarded up house that was burned so he wouldn't care if the area is rezoned. Mr. Schumann informed the property owners that there would not be an immediate impact forcing them to move out of their homes if the rezoning is approved. Mr. Mark Elkins, 1200 South 900 West, stated that he is in favor of the rezoning since he believes the rezoning would result in the area being cleaned up, resulting in increased safety for the area. Ms. Camille Elkins, 1200 South 900 West, and an employee of the Ikers, stated that she is in favor of the rezoning. Ms. Elkins said she feels the rezoning would clean up the area which is an entry way to the neighborhood, and would make it safer for the neighborhood children who walk in front of the property to the elementary school. Mr. Wright read a letter received from Mr. Leith Munding, 1350 South 900 West stating that he has no objection to the rezoning of this area. That letter is filed with the minutes. Mr. Johnson stated that the property immediately south of the Iker property to which Ms. Richter referred, is already zoned B-3 with the exception of the rear portion (approximately 40 feet) which is zoned R-2. Mr. Becker inquired if the Planning Commission could consider an amendment to the Master Plan at the same time as a rezoning request. Mr. Johnson responded in the affirmative. Mr. Schumann closed the hearing to the public at this time. Ms. Cromer moved to see all four corners of this intersection considered together as one entire package. Ms. Cromer said it appears the master plan of 1974 has not been acted on and needs to be looked at. She added that the burden of planning should not be put on the shoulders of the property owners, nor should it be at their expense. Mr. Van Alstyne seconded the motion. Mr. Bethel stated that he feels it would be a big mistake to eliminate the residential use of the northwest corner of this area. Mr. Bethel added that he feels the residential uses in the area adjoining the Iker property on the east need to be protected. PC MINUTES April 14, 1989 page 11 • Mr. Howa inquired if Ms. Cromer's motion was to table this issue. Mr. Schumann responded that what Ms. Cromer was requesting was for the Planning Staff to refile a petition that would permit zoning on the proposed parcel on a modified basis and to eliminate the B-3 zoning on the northwest corner. Mr. Schumann asked Ms. Cromer if he had stated that correctly. Ms. Cromer , responded in the affirmative and requested that the property owners in the area be notified and that all four corners be dealt with simultaneously. Ms. Cromer, Mr. Van Alstyne, Mr. Nicolatus and Mr. Howa voted "Aye;" Mr. Becker - and Mr. Bethel voted "Nay;" Mr. Ellison abstained from the vote. The motion passes. Mr. Nicolatus stated that the petitioners have requested only the east forty feet of their lot be rezoned from R-2 to B-3. Mr. Johnson agreed and said that was one of the two options the Planning Staff was suggesting. The other option was suggested in order to make the larger parcel conform. Ms. Cromer stated that she had no problem dealing with the original petition request as long as all four corners of the intersection are considered in conjunction with re-examining the master plan for the area without having to - have someone pay additional filing foes. Mr. Becker moved to approve the original petition, as filed by the petitioners, to rezone the east forty feet of the petitioner's property from - R-2 to B-3. Mr. Bethel seconded the motion; all voted "Aye" with the exceptions of Mr. Howa who voted "Nay" and Mr. Ellison who abstained from the vote. The motion passes. SUBDIVISIONS Preliminary plat approval for "Industrial Centre Park Subdivision, Phases 4,5 and 6" located on California Avenue west of Pioneer Road. Mr. Wheelwright presented the staff report stating than: this is a request for preliminary subdivision plat approval for 25 acres of industrially zoned property. Mr. Wheelwright said that Phases 1, 2 and 3 have been previously granted and Phase 1 has been recorded. The final platting will be in three phases and staff proposes that final subdivision approval authority be granted to the Planning Director. Mr. Wheelwright stated that Mr. Dahlberg, the developer, owns a total of 75 acres and this request will complete the subdivision approval of the entire 75 acres. Mr. Dahlberg has constructed $500,000 worth of street improvements thus far, on California Avenue and 3200 West. Another $150,000 worth of improvements on California Avenue are pending completion of the Interchange project in I-215 at California Avenue, scheduled for completion by UDC7r later this summer. Mr. Wheelwright stated that all city departments have reviewed this project and recommend approval. Mr. Wheelwright said the staff recommends the Planning Commission grant approval for Phases 4, 5 and 6 of the Industrial •7_,L_--,_-6-4ee.„. P L_ 71 7 th 4) _ ••i) •cf- t) a_t • . • • - •• . -• , . . • . . . , . _ _ R DAPR 4 i96, GILEKER 31 March 1989 ASSOCIATE Mr. Robert Jacoby Suite 4005 307 West 200 South Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Dear Bob, Our application for rezoning our property at 900 West 1300 South to B-3 in its entirety will be heard on Thursday, March 13th, at 5 P.M. in the Salt Lake City Commission Chambers. We will be scheduled early in that meeting, according to Cris Schultz from Planning & Zoning, who will be there also. • Gi! and ! will be out of town on that date, and we would like you to repre- sent us at the meeting. Please address any issues which arise concerning our application. We would also like you to express our support of the Planning & Zoning recommendation for rezoning to B-3 the larger block of land which in- cludes our property and all the other parcels fronting on the east side of.900 West between 1300 South and California Avenue. Street Addre s • Regards, 1307 South 900 West. Sait Lake C . Utah 84 1 QC (801;972-25E0 THELMA IKER P✓aiI nc Atdresses. Main Office'. P.O Box 893 cc: Cris Schulz sat Lake C:t. Utah 8L 10 TWX 91C-2= -.01r Branch P 1 i Box q , Boise. Idaho 83707 (208) 322-1828 P.O. Box 2065. Pocateo. Idaho 83201 P.O Box 2237 St. Georce. Utah 84770 MEinfEf Of i GB -A .r9 CIA ?7t . ACTION BROKERS INTERNATIOK. ATPLICATION FOR ZONING AMENDEMENT To be filed in duplicate with the department of Development Services 324 South State Street Suite #201 Filing Fee $100.00 Advertising Fee* $100.00 (*if a public hearing is held) AFplication is hereby made to the Mayor and City Council of Salt Lake City U4-ah, to: Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance. By amending Section (Use reverse side for requested text change) Amend the Use District (Zoning) Map. Of Salt Lake City by reclassifying the following property located at: . 1107 Smith 900 Test Salt Lakp City, UT R410.4 fLcxu a B3/R2 classification to a B3 classification (Use reverse side for legal description) ATTACH TO APPLICATION 1. The reasons why the present zoning is not proper for the area. 2. Changes which have taken place in the area which justify a change in zoning. 3. Description of the pLopcsed use to be made of the property. 4. Other items which justify a change in the existing zoning. 5. Indication of support for rezoning fran all affected property owners. 6. Any other information or exhibits which would aid the planning Commission in arriving at a proper recommendation. 7. Sidwell Parcel Identification Number. THE ABOVE INFORMATION, IN DETAIL, MJST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION IN ORDER FOR THE PETITION TO BE PROPERLY CONSIDERED EY THE PLAHNING COMMISSION. c Signature of the applic /� ddress E n Rrw AMR CT (' R4110 or 1307 So. 900 West ,I,��,'I ' or. €IQA�� `�Zip Code GT C T 84104 7 ssRe Rii 1 nC, FILL OUT REVERSE SIDE Attach all exhibits and supporting data to application. Petition No. Lf(x-r- /o Date //; /7j(/ Receipt No. ry.,,--,37)c'y -,7 Amount $ ire,),(-)Q 24 'CRY((/ !i DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CRAIG E. PETERSON 324 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 201 DIRECTOR SALT LAKE CITY. UTAH 84111 535-7777 TO: Salt Lake City Council May 31, 1989 Re: Petition No. 400-669 submitted by William and Mary Ann DeNiro Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on July 18, 1989 at 6:40 p.m. to discuss Petition No. 400-669 submitted by William and Mary Ann DeNiro. The petitioner are requesting Salt Lake City to rezone property located at 360-366 South 900 West from R-6 to a B-3. Availability of Funds: Not applicable Discussion and Background: The Planning Commission has reviewed and approved the rezoning of the property at 360-366 South 900 West to B-3 classification. The zone will allow the property to be marketed for "neighborhood" oriented business uses as presently defined in the zoning ordinance. However, it will not allow the use of the site for a "detached" car wash facility. The petitioner requested that the B-3 zoning ordinance text be changed to allow "detached" car wash, the Planning Commission and staff have denied this request. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's Office has prepared and necessary ordinance is attached for your action. Submitted by: CRAIG 1. PERSON Director lf/ SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1989 (Rezoning property located at 300-366 South 900 West from Residential "R-6" to Business "B-3" pursuant to Petition No. 400-669-88 ) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21. 14.020 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING AND FIXING OF BOUNDARIES OF USE DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, in response to the rezoning petition initiated by William and Mary Ann DeNiro, No. 400-669-88, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, has held public hearings before its own body and before the Planning Commission, and has taken into consideration citizen testimony, filing and demographic details of the area and the Master Plan as part of its deliberation. Pursuant to these deliberations, the Council has concluded that the proposed change of zoning for the property located at 300-366 South 900 West from Residential "R-6" to Business "B-3" is appropriate for the development of the community in that area; THEREFORE, The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, hereby adopts the following amendments to the Use District provisions of Title 21 . Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That the Use District Map, as adopted by Section 21 . 14.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries of Use Districts, be, and the same hereby is AMENDED to read as follows: Sec. 21.14.020. Boundaries of Districts - Use District Map Adopted. That the following-described parcel of real property in Salt Lake City, Utah, presently zoned Residential "R-6" is hereby rezoned Business "B-3" and the Use District Map is amended accordingly: , 0 BEG 149 FT S FR NE COR LOT 1 BLK 33 PLAT C SLC SUR S 33 FT W 141 FT N 33 FT E 141 FT TO BEG 5184-o6o7 7 , COM 112 FT N FR SE COR LOT 1 BLK 33 PLAT C SLC SUR N 36 FT W 141 FT S 36 FT E 141 FT TO BEG y � BEG 78 FT N FR SE COR LOT 1 BLK 33 PLAT C SLC SUR N 34 FT W 141 FT S 34 FT E 141 FT TO BEG 4o75-3o3 COM 45 FT N OF SE COR LOT 1, BLK 33, PLAT C, SLC SUR: N 33 FT: W 141 FT: S 33 FT: E 141 FT TO BEG 4453- 1268 BEG AT SE COR LOT 1 BLK 33 PLAT C SLC SUR N 45 FT W 141 FT S 45 FT E 141 FT TO BEG 4o75-3o3 SECTION 2 . EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s Action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER BRB:pp -2- Cr . :;., .. . DATE: .. ALLEN C. JOHNSON MEMBERS: PLANNING DIRECTOR RALPH BECKER SANDRA MARLER A ,k��.\///l��r��''rY ��\//gge��'� ' I CINDY CROMER SECRETARY ��\ ` `� �.��R�© I�®N THOMAS A. ELLISON LAVONE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES RICHARD IDD LE-GAM EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS: J. HOWA MAYOR OF SALT LAKE CITY Planning and Zoning Commission RALPH P. NEILSON CITY ENGINEER 324 SOUTH STATE STREET. ROOM 200 GEORGE NICOLATUS CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER SALT LAKE CITY. UTAH 84111 JOHN M. SCHIJMANN CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL F. KEITH STEPAN 535-7757 PETER VANALSTYNE KATHY WACKER May 8, 1989 Mr. Craig Peterson, Director Development Services 324 S. State, Suite 201 Salt Lake City, tir 84111 Re: Petition 400-669 - DeNiro rezoning - 400 S. and 900 W. Dear Craig: Attached please find Petition 400-669 from William and Mary Ann DeNiro requesting rezoning of their property located at 360-366 South 900 West from Residential R-6 to Business B-3 or Commercial C-1 and to amend the text of the Business B-3 Zone. At their regular meeting April 27, 1989, the Planning Commission voted to recommend to the City Council the expansion of the zoning on this property from Residential R-6 to Business B-3. The Planning Commission reviewed this petition at an informal hearing on February 9, 1989. At that time the Commission voted to table action on this request until the petitioner secured a tenant and submitted a site plan for Planning Commission review in order for them to determine exactly what they are dealing with and meet with the neighborhood. Mr. DeNiro has been unsuccessful in securing a tenant for the site and submitted a letter addressed to Chairman Schuman requesting to have his entire property rezoned to Business B-3 without a specific use for the site. The expanded B-3 zoning will allow the property to be marketed for "neighborhood" oriented business uses as presently defined in the zoning ordinance. However, it will not allow the use of the site for a "detatched" carwash facility. The planning staff did not support a zoning change to Commercial C-1 because the City's existing zoning ordinance allows certain C-1 uses which conflict with the Westside Neighborhood Land Use Plan and the staff did not support the requested amendment to the text of the Business B-3 zone. The carwash issue cannot be resolved with the existing ordinance and the staff feels that changing the wording for this one section is not the best approach. The planning staff has been given the directive to further examine the Business B-3 and Commercial C-1 districts and develop new zoning ordinance alternatives to address the issues of "neighborhood" oriented business activities. Page 2 Craig Peterson May 8, 1989 Petition 400-669 - DeNiro A copy of the staff report and supporting documents are also attached. If you have any questions concerning this petition, please contact either myself or Janice Jardine. Sincere y, Allen . Johns n, AICP Planni g Dir tor cc: John Schuman, Chairman Salt Lake City Planning Commission CP-Pet ACJ:jj pg 1E74 • v • • APR 101989 . 'IL,' ' CITY PLANNING & ('G(}( & CONING COMMISSI_ON Z20 0 pMM15SK3N :Aril 10 . 1989 Salt Lake City Planning Commission Mr. John Schumann , Chairperson 324 South State Street Room 203 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear John: I appeared at an Informal Hearing on February 9 , 1989 regarding Petition No. 400-669 by William V. and Mary Ann DeNiro to amend the Zoning Ordinance and/or rezone property at 360-380 South 900 West. My tenant informed me on February 29 , 1989 "--- but after careful consideration we have decided not to pursue a rezoning and permit at this location. I do not have a back-up tenant. Tenants and prospective businesses are extremely difficult to attract to this particular area. I urge the Commission to review and amend the text of the B-3 Zoning because it is excessively restrictive and excludes good and valuable businesses from establishing in this area. I would like to proceed with the application and request that the parcel be Zoned B-3 . Currently it is Zoned B-3 and R-'. The entire Parcel has been in a 3-3 use for approximately the past 20-25 years. The Zoning of the entire 'arcel to 3-3 will allow me to pursue a tenant and get a business operational without further delay and/or risk of loss of another tenant. Sincerely , 24.-P—rt William V. DeNiro WVD/mot Copy: Janice Jardine 411::::;;!4! 2290 EAST 4500 SOUTH SUITE 260 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84117-4465 TELEPHONE (801)278-0466 February 28, 1989 Bill DeNiro RE: 400 East & 900 West Salt Lake City Dear Bill : Thank you for offering us this location, but after careful consideration we have decided not to pursue a rezoning'and permit at this location. Sincerely, • ‘6411 Mg,"7--"'" Harlan McGregor Manager, Real Estate & Development HM/k 1 MEMBERS: ALLEN C. JOHNSON RALPH BECKER PLANNING DIRECTOR ® r 1 ` CINDY CROMER SANDRA MARLER SALT 1 ,L` 1 ` I j 002 eNP©g��® THOMAS A. ELLISON SECRETARY d�di LAVONE LIDDLE-GAMONAL DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES RICHARD J. HOWA EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS Planning and Zoning Commission RALPH P NEILSON MAYOR OF SALT LAKE CITY GEORGE NICOLATUS CITY ENGINEER 324 SOUTH STATE STREET. ROOM 200 JOHN M. SCHUMANN CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 F. KEITH STEPAN CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL 535-7757 PETER VANALSTYNE KATHY WACKER MEMORANDUM DATE: April 19, 1989 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Janice Jardine Long Range Planning/Urban Design RE: Petition 400-669 - DeNiro rezoning and zoning expansion request at 360 - 380 South 900 West The Planning Conullission reviewed this petition at an informal hearing on February 9, 1989. At that time the Planning Commission voted to table action on this request until the petitioner secured a tenant and submitted a site plan for Planning Commission review in order for them to determine exactly what they are dealing with and meet with the neighborhood. Since that time Mr. DeNiro has been unsuccessful in securing a tenant for the site. He has submitted a letter addressed to Chairman Schuman requesting to have his entire property rezoned to Business B-3 without a specific use for the site. The planning staff's original staff report is attached. The staff's recommendation remains the same: That the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the expansion of the zoning on this property from Residential R-6 to Business B-3. Expansion of the zoning as requested will provide adequate commercial square footage to accommodate a site design which is sensitive to the compatibility guidelines outlined in the Westside Neighborhood Land Use Plan. New development will upgrade the existing streetscape to the City' current standards by replacement of deteriorated or substandard sidewalk, curb, and gutter and providing landscaped park strips, setbacks and residential buffers. The expanded B-3 zoning will allow the property to be marketed for "neighborhood" oriented business uses as presently defined in the zoning ordinance. SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PETITION 400-669 MR. WILLIAM DENIRO REQUESTING TO AMEND THE TEXT OF THE BUSINESSIB-3 ZONE AND REZONE PROPERTY AT 380 SOUTH 900 WEST FROM BUSINESS B-3/RESIDENTIAL R-6 TO BUSINESS B-3 OR COMMERCIAL C-1 OVERVIEW This is a request from Mr. William and Ms. Mary Ann DeNiro requesting Salt Lake City to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance Sec. 21 .52.010.6.a. which regulates gasoline service stations and/or rezone to Business B-3 or Commercial C-1 that portion of their property which is presently Residential R-6. This property is located on the northwest corner of 400 South and 900 West Streets. The proposed use for the site is a self-service gasoline and convenience store with an automatic car wash. 11.5. 1 .1:1O PiERfOMT �vF'_ vit 3RU SOUTH / h Z O • !! L • NO .0 m SOU h _ • S o CD Q1 1tjJfl \ Av � BACKGROUND The existing structure was used as a small grocery store until it burned in June of 1988. The property has remained in the same ownership for approximately 50 years. The surrounding land uses to the west, north and east across 900 West are residential. There is a church on the northeast corner of 900 West and 400 South, a "7-11" convenience store on the southeast corner and "Neff Floral" on the southwest corner. All four corners are zoned Business B-3. ANALYSIS MASTER PLAN CONSIDERATIONS The Westside Neighborhood Land Use Plan has identified this area to remain zoned for neighborhood businesses which provide services and commercial activity at a neighborhood scale. The intersections of 900 West at 400 South and 800 South are identified as the areas principle retail nodes and as such should be encouraged to redevelop. The Westside Neighborhood Land Use Plan states, ". . .the commercial uses should not be intrusive nor create a negative impact on abutting or surrounding residential areas. " The plan outlines compatibility guidelines which protect the neighborhood environment and allow flexibility in site plan design in terms of visual quality, traffic generation, sound attenuation, streetscape and urban design characteristics, and building orientation, height, bulk and placement of support equipment. With the expansion of the zoning as requested the site will have adequate square footage to accommodate a site design which is sensitive to these standards. New development of this site will upgrade the existing streetscape to the city's current standards by replacement of deteriorated or substandard sidewalk, curb, and gutter and landscaped park strips and setbacks. Street trees should also be planted as directed by the Salt Lake City Urban Forester. The Major Street Plan and Official Map designates both 400 South and 900 West as minor arterials. These streets are able to support commercially oriented traffic without creating any significant impact on the residential areas. ZONING ISSUES The present zoning is Business B-3 from 400 South north 100 feet then 81 feet of Residential R-6. The petitioner is requesting to have the entire site which is approximately 25,000 square feet changed entirely to a Business B-3 zone or Commercial C-1 zone in order to accommodate a gas/convenience store and car wash. Both the Business B-3 and Commercial C-1 districts could be appropriate commercial zones for this area as identified in the Westside Neighborhood Land Use Plan. The B-3 zone allows a gasoline service station which includes ordinary repairs and servicing of vehicles and as an accessory use one bay of the building may be used for an automatic car wash with all services required to be conducted inside the building. The C-1 zone allows as a conditional use a detached automatic car wash as an accessory to a self-service or full service gas station with specific conditions to be met. Since the proposed use for this corner is a gas/convenience store with a car wash and will not provide vehicle repair or service the site will require a Commercial C-1 zone: However, the Commercial C-1 also allows high intensity uses such as printing plants, storage warehouses, soft-drink bottling plants and auto rental agencies which are incompatible with the master plan which specifies commercial activity at a neighborhood scale. The petitioner is also requesting to amend the text of Sec. 21 .52.010.6.a. of the Business B-3 zone which deals with gasoline service stations by making the repairs and servicing of vehicles an option, changing the wording from "including" to "may include". The carwash issue cannot be resolved with the existing ordinance and the staff feels that changing the wording for this one section is not the best approach. The planning staff has been given the directive to further examine the Business B-3 and Commercial C-1 districts and develop new zoning ordinance alternatives to address the issues of "neighborhood" oriented and located business activities. RECOMMENDATION The Planning staff has scheduled an informal hearing to receive neighborhood input on the proposed zoning expansion. Staff attended the January 25, 1989 meeting of the Westside Community Council and provided information concerning Mr. DeNiro 's proposal. The proposal received a favorable consensus from the Community Council. The staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the expansion of the zoning on this property from Residential R-6 to Business B-3. Expansion of the zoning as requested will provide adequate commercial square footage to accommodate a site design which is sensitive to the compatibility guidelines outlined in the Westside Neighborhood Land Use Plan. New development will upgrade the existing streetscape to the City's current standards by replacement of deteriorated or substandard sidewalk, curb, and gutter and providing landscaped park strips, setbacks and residential buffers. The expanded B-3 zoning will allow the property to be marketed for "neighborhood" oriented business uses as presently defined in the zoning ordinance. However, it will not allow the use of the site for a "detatched" carwash facility. Within the context of the City's existing zoning ordinances, certain C-1 uses conflict with the Westside Neighborhood Master Plan. Therefore, the staff does not support a zoning change to Commercial C-1 . January 1989 Janice M. Jardine PC MINUTES February 9, 1989 Page 8 INFORMAL HFNflNG - Petition No. 400-669 by William and Mary Ann Deniro requesting Salt Lake City to amend the Zoning Ordinance, Section 21.52.010.6.A and/or rezone property at 360-380 South 900 West from Business "B-3/Residential R-6" to Business "B-3" or Commercial "C-1," to allow a Rainbo Oil Gas Station Convenience Store. It was pointed out that the notices had been sent out to the neighborhood giving an incorrect address for the petition site. Mr. Schumann inquired if the hearing should be postponed. Mr. Wright stated that the same people would have been notified, and since this was only an informal hearing, he recommended proceeding with the information and the people present. He pointed out that a formal hearing before the City Council would be held on this matter and advertised in the newspapers at a later date. Mr. Wright also stated that this matter had been before the community councils and the neighborhood was aware of the petition. The Planning Commission agreed to hear the matter at this time. Ms. Jardine presented the staff report stating that the petitioner is requesting Salt Lake City amend the Zoning Ordinance, Section 21.52.010.6.A, and/or rezone the area in question from Residential "R-6" to Business "B-3" or Coii rcial "C-1" in order to facilitate a self-service gasoline and convenience store with an automatic car wash. Ms. Jardine stated that the Westside Neighborhood Land Use Plan has identified this area to remain zoned for neighborhood businesses which provide services and commercial activity at a neighborhood scale. The intersections of 900 West at 400 South and 800 South are identified as the area's principal retail nodes and as such, should be encouraged to redevelop. Ms. Jardine said the Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council, the expansion of the zoning on this property from Residential "R-6" to Business "B-3." Expansion of the zoning as requested, will provide adequate commercial square footage to accommodate a site design which is sensitive to the compatibility guidelines outlined in the Westside Neighborhood Land Use Plan. New development will upgrade the existing streetscape to the City's current standards by replacement of deteriorated or substandard sidewalk, curb and gutter, and by providing landscaped park strips, setbacks and residential buffers. The expanded "B-3" zoning will allow the property to be marketed for "neighborhood" oriented business uses as presently defined in the zoning ordinance. It will not, however, allow the use of the site for a "detached" car wash facility. Within the context of the City' existing zoning ordinance, certain "C-1" uses conflict with the Westside Neighborhood Master Plan. Therefore, the staff does not support a zoning change to Commercial "C-1." Ms. Jardine added that the community council is in favor of this petition. Ms. Jardine said that the Planning Staff is not in favor of amending the text of the zoning ordinance • dealing with the "B-3" zone. Mr. William Deniro, the petitioner, 415 East 4800 South, stated that it is very difficult to obtain tenants for this property. He handed out a paper outlining his suggestions for three possible solutions to this matter, a copy of which is filed with the minutes. Solution 41 requests a zoning ordinance amendment to change the wording ". . .including ordinary repairs. . . ," to read ". . .MAY INCE ordinary repairs. . ." as well as a rezoning of the "R-6" portion of his property to a "B-3" classification. Solution #2 requests PC MINUTES February 9, 1989 Page 9 approval of the petition under Chapter 12C of the ordinance dealing with mixed use transitional overlays which would allow the operation of a gasoline service station, providing a conditional use permit is obtained. Solution #3 requests amending the Use District of the "B-3" and "R-6" to "C-1" which allows detached automatic car wash facilities when a conditional use permit has been obtained. Mr. Deniro stated that he is in favor of Solution #1 but will accept either of the other two solutions. Mr. Wright stated that the staff's opinion of the minimum requirement for a service station is that it provide automobile repair services. Mr. Wright stated that an opinion received from the city attorney defines a service station as any place selling gasoline and oil. Mr. Wright added that when Rainbo Oil was attempting to meet the repairs performance requirement, they decided to do a joint venture with Minute Lube connecting the two buildings. This solution was not acceptable to the Planning Staff. Due to the difficulties encountered with this matter, the Planning Staff is in the process of recommending City Council revoke Paragraph B of Section 21.52.010.6 of the zoning ordinance. This would eliminate the problem of determining in which zones car washes are allowed. Mr. Wright explained that this ordinance was drafted several years ago to allow full service gasoline stations with an extra repair bay to install a car wash in one of the surplus bays. The car washing service was for those people who had their cars in for repairs, not the customer off the street who simply desired a car wash. The type of facilities now being placed on the market cannot moot the criteria in the ordinance due to the requirement that no cars may be allowed to line up waiting for the washing services. Mr. Wright stated that the Planning Staff will be studying the text of the "C-1" and "B-3" zoning ordinances, the actual districts, and the placement of businesses in these zcnes during the next six to eight months. Mr. Kim Anderson, 768 North Redwood Road, Vice Chairman of SLACC, stated that he would oppose any change to the "B-3" ordinance at this time. Mr. Joseph Neff, of Neff Floral on the corner of 900 South and 400 West, stated that he is in favor of the petition since he feels it will upgrade the neighborhood and add much needed vitality to it. He stated that construction • in the neighborhood will send out a message of growth. Mr. Deniro presented a petition signed by the abutting property owners stating they are in favor of this. matter. Mr. Deniro also presented a letter signed by Councilmember Wayne Horrccks stating he is in favor of a Rainbo Oil Gas Station being constructed at this location providing Rainbo Oil mitigates the impact of the car wash on the surrounding neighborhood. Mr. Wright stated that though there may be ways to design a convenience store with a detached car wash, the Planning Staff is concerned that if a change to a "C-1" classification occurs for this particular corner, the same issue might come up for the other three corners in the area. In addition, some "C-1" uses are not compatible with the master plan for this area. Mr. Ellison stated .that the fundamental problem with this matter is that there is not a proposal for a specific use of this property, since negotiations with Rainbo Oil are only tentative. Mr. Ellison stated that it would be easier to PC MIN[JIS February 9, 1989 Page 10 make a decision on this petition if the Planning Commission was dealing with a specific use. Mr. Deniro stated that he had submitted a letter from Rainbo Oil with his application expressing their interest in leasing this property for a gasoline convenience store at this location. Mr. Ellison then stated that the Rainbo Oil station might not be inconsistent with the master plan for the area but another "C-1" use might be. Mr. Deniro addressed the issue of specific use by stating that this was the reason he had submitted the letter from Rainbo and two site proposals, one with a detached car wash and one with an attached car wash. Ms. Jardine pointed out, however, that Mr. Deniro was ' also considering dealing with Conoco and that the negotiations with Rainbo were not final. Ms. Cromer stated that she is opposed to any car wash abutting residential property. Mr. Howa moved to table this petition until the Planning Commission has been able to look at the site plan in order to determine exactly what they are dealing with. Mr. Nicolatus seconded the motion. Mr. Ellison suggested that the petitioner be required to meet with the neighborhood. Mr. Howa accepted the amendment to the motion; Mr. Nicolatus accepted it to the second. Mr. Wright stated that he had spoken with Mr. Harlin MacGregor of Rainbo Oil who has asserted that Rainbo Oil is not prepared to present a specific commitment to the Planning Commission for development on this particular site until the zoning has been changed, allowing them to develop their site plan. Mr. Deniro stated that Rainbo has submitted two site plans. Mr. Wright then stated that Mr. MacGregor would not come to the meeting and state what Rainbo would be willing to construct. Mr. Wright stated that Conoco is not constructing a car wash at their site on 1300 South and State Street where it is allowed and, therefore, there are businesses who might be willing to develop on this site without the car wash facilities. Mr. Deniro said the car wash is not the issue but rather, the wording in the ordinance requiring ordinary servicing of vehicles that is causing difficulty. Mr. Wright stated that if there is no nocd for a car wash at this site, the staff recommendation for expanding the zoning to allow for an appropriate amount of property to market for "B-3" use, is consistent with the request. Mr. Nicolatus, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Neilson and Mr. Howa voted "Aye;" Ms. Cromer and Mr. Becker voted "Nay." There being no other business, the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. \''.)L//f/;5 ---7277(2/$4 Secretary I")/ SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING CU/MISSION DATE: Dec 1 1988. 110: Rae Hunsaker - Fire Department. FROM: Efosa Osazuwa-Planning. a G� RE: Petition no 400-669 -Deniro rezoning request Please review the attached petition requesting Salt Lake City to rezone property at 360, 362, 364, 366 and 380 South 900 West to allow a Rainbo Oil Gas station Convenience Store and also include a carwash. Please return your coments to me by December 9, 1988. Thanks • �ic 4 i1/0 D /eC /dN d G1 4,/, 7z, fi7,`,A/ Z,v, ter/gem/ Civ/s a� /He/Zr ��v te4 Te e. GU e,v 4/ LEROY W. HOOTON, JR• DIRECTOR WENDELL E. EVENSEN, P.E. SALT' -r. t _ateG OITd.aY� 40yR-.aP t �ION ,UPERINTENDENT WATER SUPPLY & WATERWORKS : E. TIM DEY SUPERINTENDENT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER RECLAMATION WATER SUPPLY& WATERWORKS PALMER DEPAULIS JAMES M. LEWIS, C.P.A. WATER RECLAMATION MAYOR CHIEF FINANCE &ACCOUNTING OFFICER SOUTH1530 WEST TEMPLE GEORGE JORGENSEN,P.E. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 CHIEF ENGINEER MEMORANDUM December 8, 1988 TO: Doug Wheelwright Planning & Zoning FROM: E. T. Doxey �// Water Reclamation Superintendent RE: PETITION NO. 400-669 - DENIRO REZONING REQUEST The Public Utilities Department has reviewed the above noted petition and has no objections to the petitioners request If you have further water or sewer questions regarding this matter, please feel free to call Mr. Vince Houtz at 483-6725 . /co FORMS � DEC 2 7 196d SALT'LAE CITY(CORPORATION' FINANCE DEPARTMENT LANCE R. BATEMAN, CPA Purchasing and Property Management Division PALMER DEPAULIS DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 324 SOUTH STATE STREET MAYOR 5TH FLOOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 PURCHASING (801) 535-7661 PROPERTY 535-7133 December 23, 1988 T0: Efosa Osazuwa Planning FROM: Eric H. Thorpe • Real Property Manag RE: PETITION NO. 400-669, DENIRO REZONING REQUEST This memo will confirm the previous phone conversation I had on this matter with Janice Jardine. As Janice and I discussed, Property Management has no objection to this petition being granted. Please contact me if you have any questions. EHT/mt APPLICATION FOR ZONING AMENDEMENT To be filed in duplicate with the department of Development Services 324 South State Street Suite #201 Filing Fee $100.00 Advertising Fee* $100.00 (*if a public hearing is held) Application is hereby made to the Mayor and City Council of Salt Lake City Utah, to: 1, Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance. By amending Section 21.52.010 6. a. (Use reverse side for requested text change) OR 2. Amend the Use District (Zoning) Map. Of Salt Lake City by reclassifying following property located at: 360, 362, 364 , 366 and 380 South 900 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84104 R-6 Portion to B-3 OR from aB-3/R-6 classification to a C-1 classification (Use reverse side for legal description ATTACH TO APPLICATION 1. The reasons why the present zoning is not proper for the area. 2. Changes which have taken place in the area which justify a change in zoning. 3. Description of the proposed use to be made of the property. 4. Other items which justify a change in the existing zoning. 5. Indication of support for rezoning from all affected property owners. 6. Any other information or exhibits which would aid the planning • Commission in arriving at a proper recommendation. 7. Sidwell Parcel Identification Number. THE ABOVE INFORMATION, IN DETAIL, MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION IN ORDER FOR THE PETITION TO BE PROPERLY CONSIDERED BY COMMISSION. IISSION. 388 East 4800 South Signature of the applicant KAAotp9 ved Address 415 East 4800 South 266 1037 Murray, Utah _ Telephone Number 262 7310x- Zip Code 84107 FILL OUT REVERSE SIDE Attach all exhibits and supporting data to application. Petition No. 2103-66 Date /(/jx/Sc Receipt No. ()(;)` (WW' Amount $ )G19,00 ATTACIP[ENT TO APPLICATION: 1. The present Zoning and text is excessively restrictive and excludes good and valuable businesses from establishing in the area and does not in fact provide for the general welfare of the area and its residents. A amendment to Ordinance 21.52.010 6. a. from "including" TO "may include" or reclassify- ing will allow the desired flexibility but still provide the City and residents the full protection that exists under the present Salt Lake City Ordinance regulating Zoning. 2. This property was originally acquired by my father and mother in approximately 1938•-40. My father is deceased and my mother is 76 years of age and without social security benefits. The store on the premises was originally built as a "Safeway Super Market", leased to the Art Reynolds family for two generations, Steve Regan and then Clark Fjelsted as "Clarks". The structure was set on fire on June 28, 1988 by juveniles. The owners made their investment in this area, neighborhood and property almost 50 years ago. The area and residents have been good to my parents and also to the tenants and they likewise have been good to them. The proposed tenant will make a sizeable investment in this neighborhood. This is a unique oppor- tunity to attract an excellent tenant in the area and to attract and encourage other ones also. My mother now needs your help to keep their original invest- ment alive. The area recently has taken on the appearance of a depressed or blighted one and is in need of an infusion of new businesses to help up-grade it. It is extremely difficult to attract new business and tenants into this area. Recent indications of Los Angeles type gangs exist as evidenced by the paint- ing of business establishments over the recent Labor Day week-end with "Krips" and other gang graffiti. Zoning needs to be amended or changed to provide and allow flexibility for the establishment and operation of desireable new businesses in the area. There are currently 347 acres of B-3 Zoning in Salt Lake City. Changes need to be made now or in the near future enormous amounts of City Redevelopment monies will have to be spent to re-vitalize this area. The best solution is to provide the flexibility and to let private money and free enterprise correct the present downward trend. 3. The proposed use is for a retail grocery, self serve gasoline, and car wash with the prospective tenant being but not limited to Rainbo Marts (A 000) . 4. Traffic counts and a market study indicates that this is an excellent location for such a business. Rainbo develops a superb site with quality construction and landscaping that is unequalled. They would be a real asset to the area providing needed and desired goods and services and would be a pride to the neighborhood. A recent survey of neighbors abutting the site indicates enthusiastic support for the project and for the tenant. The desired site size for the prospective tenant would be the entire 141' x 181' . 5. Endorsements per attached . 6. Rainbo exhibits. 7. Sidwell Parcel Identification Number(s) on reverse side of this application. August 15, 1988 Salt Lake County Assessor Salt Lake County Board of Equalization Government Center 2001 South State Street #N2300A Salt Lake City, Utah 84190-1300 Dear Board: I hereby request an adjustment downward in my tax liability for the 1988 tax year based on the following facts: 1. I am 76 years of age. 2. I am a widow. 3. I receive no social security benefits or insurance benefits because my deceased husband was self employed. My social security number is 529 68 0432. 4. I had two sources of rental income as follows: an 94a•F a. Parcel 16 07 308 001 0000 leased for $9440 per month with a 1988 tax of $1638.82. b. Parcel 15 02 402 032 0000 leased for $650 per month with a 1988 tax of $1,123.43. This rental was set on fire by juveniles on June 28, 1988 and is untenable. 5. I still have all of the fixed expenses with a reduction of approximately 41% of the income. 6. I have large insurance costs and am in poor health. Your careful consideration and requested adjustment will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Mary Ann DeNiro MAD:mot • • 11111\-.0:-Isk.Lak„.. 2290 EAST 4500 SOUTH SUITE 260 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84117-4465 TELEPHONE(801)278-0466 September 8, 1988 William B. Deniro 415 E. 4800 S. Mirray, UT 84107 SUBJECT: GROUND LEASE N/W CORNER, 400 S. & 900 W. SALT LAKE CITY, UT Dear Mr. Deniro: The purpose of this letter is to express our interest in a ground lease on your property located on the north side of 400 South and the west side of 900 West . (approximately 25,121 square feet ) We would require an initial primary lease term of five years with four five (5) year options. We would propose an initial net rental rate of $1 ,000.00 per month with five year increases of 12'/0. This ground lease offer is contingent upon: 1 . Acquiring adequate municipal approvals which allow Rainbo Warts to use the property for a retail grocery, self serve gasoline, and carwash. 2. Acquiring an off premise beer license. 3. Acquiring a building permit and sign permit for its standard plan specifications. 4. Ground water and soil tests acceptable to AMJCO. 5. Final approval of AMOCO management , and execution of a definitive lease. (See Exhibit A. ) Sincerely, 41-1C—hr— Harlan McGregor Manager, Real Estate & Development HLM/kl Accepted Date W.B. Deniro cc: Dan Simons SALT LADE CTY` CORPORATION; OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL SUITE 300, CITY HALL 324 SOUTH STATE STREET SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 535-7600 October 31 , 1988 Mr. William Dinero 415 East 4800 South Murray, Utah 84107 Dear Mr. Dinero: As we discussed previously, I would like to express my support for your efforts to locate a Rainbow Oil gas station convenience store on the corner of 400 South 900 West . My support is contingent upon Rainbow Oil 's agreement to mitigate the impact of the car wash on the surrounding neighborhood and upon a petition signed by the impacted neighbors. I have received a copy of that petition, and am now willing to extend my support for this development as long as it is understood that the location and design of the car wash will be such to minimize noise in the neighborhood. If I can be of further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 0e0Org—. Xyvi,,s/C,402_.‘2_2 L. Wayne Horrocks Council Member District Two LWH:ccr WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNERS ABUTTING AND/OR AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS ENDORSE AND SUPPORT THE PROPOSED AMENDING AND/OR RECLASSIFYING OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 360, 362, 364, 366 AND 380 SOUTH 900 WEST, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84104 TO BE USED FOR A RETAIL GROCERY, SELF SERVICE GASOLINE, AND CAR WASH. WE URGE THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TO GRANT TIIE REQUEST. NAME: ADDRESS: / z/ l mil, _ 3 ,�� i u i ----is%—' --/- /gq,/ - ' ,c/ '‘'-fi2=2---- Sg) Pc-c-e Z(-)e _,---'74,i 77 12/ , I() /I-) y ) ") „SD '9;‘_ /Z J.' 6 / 6 'D"/,,, ,,/ /2, -,,,t,/ . 3.4--‘. -5. " r ' .49' ' d- / Ij_ so. V\/ C z • / �.*,e.--1,-,-, V, 0, ci.,---3C ( r l4vA ✓ q'LI ' 0 D n 1 5 ROGER F. CUTLER SA TPERGITYrCORP RATION[ ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS CITY ATTORNEY RAY L. MONTGOMERY STEVEN W. ALLRED LAW DEPARTMENT GREG R. HAWKINS DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING LARRY V. SPENDLOVE BRUE R. CHERYL D. LUKE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, SUITE 505 FRANKCM. NAKAIMURA CITY PROSECUTOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 (801) 535-7788 ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS FAX (801) 535-7640 DONALD L. GEORGE CECELIA M. ESPENOZA MEMORANDUM RICHARD G. HAMP GLEN A. COOK TO: Mayor DePaulis FROM: Greg R. Hawkins, Assistant City Attorney RE: Stop Intersections Ordinance Change DATE: May 24, 1989 We have had a request from the Police Department, concurred in by the Transportation Department, to change the City ordinance on stop intersections to comply with state law. The state law changed a few years ago making the city ordinance in conflict with it. Please contact Sgt. Folsom of the Salt Lake City Police Department or Tim Harpst, Transportation Engineer, for persons to testify in support of the change. GRH:pp Enclosures cc: St. Folsom Tim Harpst (with enclosure) r A.:, SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1989 (Stop Intersections ) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 12, CHAPTER 44, SECTION 210, SUBPARAGRAPH A OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, 1988, RELATING TO STOP INTERSECTIONS, AND RE-LETTERING SUBSEQUENT SUBPARAGRAPHS AS FOLLOWS: Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That Title 12, Chapter 44, Section 210, Subsection A of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to Stop intersections be, and the same hereby is, amended, with subsequent subparagraphs re-lettered as follows: 12.44.210 [ ]Stop intersections. A. [ , this title, at the entrance to a through highway, and shall yield the right of way to othcr vehicles which have entered the so closely on such through highway as to constitute and immediate hazard, but the driver having so yielded may proceed, and the drivers of all other vehicles approaching the intersection on g into or across the through highway. ]Except as specified in Subsection (B) , when more than one vehicle enters or approaches an unregulated or an all-way stop intersection from different highways at approximately the same time, the operator of the vehicle on the left shall yield the right-of-way to the vehicle on the right, unless otherwise directed by a peace officer. B. When approaching an unregulated intersection the operator of a vehicle on a highway that does not continue beyond the intersection shall yield the right-of-way to the operator of any vehicle on the intersecting highway. [B ]C. Except when directed to proceed by a police officer or traffic-control signal, every driver of a vehicle approaching a stop intersection indicated by a stop sign shall stop as required by Section 12. 48 . 030, or its successor, and after having stopped shall yield the right-of-way to any vehicle: 1 . * * * 2. * * * 3. * * * [G ]D. In the event that a driver, after having driven past a stop sign, is involved in a collision with a pedestrian having right-of-way in a crosswalk or a vehicle having right-of- way in the intersection such collision shall be deemed prima facie evidence of such driver' s failure to yield the right-of- way as required by this section, but shall not be considered negligence per se. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989 . -2- CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 1989 . Published: GRH:rc -3- LEROY W. HOOION,JR. DIRECTOR WENOELL E. EVENSEN, P.E. Mkt l 1 rl, A\ ;� � ��R� �� SUPERINTENDENT � tea_+�1 WATER SUPPLY&WATERWORKS E. TIM DOXEY SUPERINTENDENT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER RECLAMATION •'° 'WATER SUPPLY & WATERWORKS• PALMER DEPAULIS JAMES M. LEWIS, C.P.A. ; = WATER RECLAMATION :..!.• ` MAYOR CHIEF FINANCE& ACCOUNTING OFFICER - .1530 SOUTH,.WEST:TEMPLE GEORGE JORGENSEN, RE. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 CHIEF ENGINEER April 27, 1989 TO: Salt• Lake City Council RE: AMENDMENT TO SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE SECTIONS 17.16. 670, 17. 16. 680, AND 17. 72.030, IN REGARDS TO PROPOSED WATER RATE INCREASE AND SEWER RATE DECREASE Recommendation: That the City Council approve the above rate increase and decrease. Availability of Funds: N/A • _Discussion: It is proposed that the Salt Lake City Public Utilities water rates be increased to finance the major capital improvements required by the Water Utility Fund. The proposed rate increase would fund a waterline replacement program which is urgently needed. We propose a $1.00 per month surcharge be placed on the minimum bill or $12.00 per year for a residential 3/4-inch by 1-inch meter and a proportional amount by meter size. It is also proposed that the usage rate be increased by $ .04 per hundred cubic feet from $.38 to $.42 for City residents and by $1.06 per hundred cubic feet for our county customers. It is also proposed that the Salt Lake City Public Utilities sewer rates be decreased due to a revision of our financial projections for the 1989-90 budget request. It is anticipated that the sewer rates could be reduced and still finance the capital improvements required for the next 10 years. The sewer . rate reduction would be from $.85 to $ .80, which would reduce the average residential users` bill by $.40 per month or $4. 80 per year. The net effect of these proposed changes would increase the average residential water and sewer user by $. 60 per month or $7.20 per year. i-: --- o LEROY HOOTON, JR. Director •f y SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE • No. of 1989 (Water and sewer rates) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 17.16.670, 17.16.680 AND 17.72.030 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO WATER AND SEWER RATES. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That Table 17.16.670 of Section 17.16. 670 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to minimum charges, be, and the same hereby is amended as follows: Table 17.16.670 • Inside of Inside of Outside of Outside of City City City City Connection Monthly Bimonthly Monthly Bimonthly 3/4" & 1" $6.70 $13.40 $9.20 $18.40 1 1/2" 19.30 38.60 26.25 52.50 • 2" 29.10 58.20 39.10 78.20 3"- - 58.50 117.00 ' 79.50 ... _ 159.00 4" • 90.20 :180" 40-: 1 ... _, ':., - -.r�131:20 =T=. 262.40 • • 6 192.55 385.10 .263.50 527.00 8" 287.30 . 574..60 • 393.30 .. • .:786.60 •10" • 409.20. : 818.40 560.20 1,120.40 . • SECTION 2. ' That Section 17.16.680 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to meter rates, be, and the same hereby is amended as follows: 17.16.680 Meter rates. The rates for water supplied through meters to all places, after the minimum charges for the first one thousand cubic feet of water specified in Section 17.16. 670, or its successor, will be as follows: A. Inside the corporate limits of the city, forty two cents per one hundred cubic feet of water served through each service connection; B. Outside the corporate limits of the city, sixty two cents per one hundred cubic feet of water served through each service connection. SECTION 3. That subsections 3 and 5 of Section 17.72.030, of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to Schedule 3 - rates and fees, be, and the same hereby is amended as follows: 3. Sewer Charge. Each sewer service account shall be charged $3. 15 per month minimum charge or $.80 per 100 cubic feet of the average monthly water meter readings of those using solely city water during the consecutive months of November, December, January, February and March each year, hereafter • "winter readings, " whichever is higher. Said 'winter - ' r readings shall be .the .basis. for .sewer billings for. the period July lst .through June 30th following such winter readings. Any user who had more than one water meter, one or more of which measures water eventually discharged into the sewer, and one or more other meters measuring water not entering the sewer, will be charged $. 80 per 100 cubic feet for all water used which may enter the sewer, but will not be assessed a sewer charge on water meter( s) which measure water no part of which flows into the sewer system. -2- .(0) `y----- - For those not using- city water or using- some-city C) water, the city may require a city-approved meter, at the sewer user' s expense, on the well(s) or other source(s) of water supply, for measurement by city during said months to determine the sewer user's water use during said months, the average of which shall become the basis for sewer billings for said period. For each single dwelling unit not using city water and desiring not to install a water meter as required above, the director of the department of public utilities may waive the meter requirement, in which event the user will be charged for sewer service as provided in Subparagraph (5)(a) hereof. * * * - r 5. New Sewer Connections or Change in Occupancy. Any new sewer service or existing sewer having changed occupants (applies only to one to three dwelling units) or those whichdo not have sufficient or accurate data to establish said monthly winter reading, sewer rate shall .be assessed monthly charges as follows until such data is available: (a) For each single dwelling unit, $6.40 per month. (b) For each duplex, $6.40 per month, per dwelling unit. (c) For each triplex, $6.40 per month, per dwelling unit. -3- (d) For each multiple dwelling, a minimum monthly charge of $6.40 per dwelling unit or $. 50 per 100 cubic feet of total water consumption, whichever is highest. (e) For all other users, a minimum charge of $6.40 per month or $ . 50 per 100 cubic feet of total water consumption, whichever is highest. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER RLM:cc is,•s)%-.k 1( ,y'r. t s~ c -4- ATTACHMENT A PUBLIC UTILITES WATER AND SEWER RATE OOMPARISON ADDITIONAL RATE OPTIONS SMALL AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ANNUAL BILLS BY RATE OPTION CURRENT CHARGES MINIMUM 5.70 USAGE RATE .38 WATER 68.40 135.28 SEWER 81.60 91.80 150.00 227.08 PROPOSED RATE INCREASE MINIMUM 6.70 USAGE RATE .42 WATER 80.40 154.32 SEWER 76.80 86.40 157.20 240.72 OPTION ONE MINIMUM 6.45 USAGE RATE .43 WATER 77.40 153.08 SEWER 76.80 86.40 154.20 239.48 OPTION TWO MINIMUM 6.20 USAGE RATE .44 WATER 74.40 151.84 SEWER 76.80 86.40 151.20 238.24 YEARLY INCREASE BY OPTION PROPOSED RATE (INCREASE) WATER 12.00 19.04 SEWER -4.80 -5.40 7.20 13.64 OPTION ONE WATER 9.00 17.80 SEWER -4.80 -5.40 4.20 12.40 OPTION TWO WATER 6.00 16.56 SEWER -4.80 -5.40 1.20 11.16 cc< 5- i, .. . . LEROY W. HOOTON, JR. . DIRECTOR WENDELL E. EVENSEN, P.E. [[��11 � SUPERINTENDENT \� ` 11 1 r A`112% . 9 P I,ON1 WATER SUPPLY R.WATERWORKS llll,.�r E. TIM DOXEY SUPERINTENDENT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER RECLAMATION WATER SUPPLY & WATERWORKS - PALMER DEPAULIS JAMES M. LEWIS. CPA. WATER RECLAMATION MAYOR CHIEF FINANCE R. ACCOUNTING OFFICER 1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE GEORGE JORGENSEN, PE SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 CHIEF ENGINEER June 12, 1989 TO: Members of the City Council FROM: LeRoy Hooton, Jr. L1.004----- : RE: Additional Rate Increas tions Per your request attached are additional rate increase options. Both options would generate the same revenue increase of two million dollars. However, each would effect the small residential customer differently and shift more of the burden onto the larger users. This also shifts the revenue source from a fixed rate which we can depend on to a variable rate which will fluctuate with the seasonal variations. (See Attachment A) A. Option One Increase the minimum by $0. 75 per month from $5. 70 to $6.45 and the usage rate by $0. 05 from $. 38 to $.43 to the city users. This would still generate two million dollars. B. Option Two Increase the minimum by $0.50 per month from $5. 70 to $6. 20 and the usage rate by $0. 06 from $. 38 to $.44 to the. city users. This would still generate two million dollars. Management and the Public Utilities Advisory Board would still reconrnend the original request as submitted in the Mayor's proposed budget. It is our feeling that only our proposal fairly allocates the cost of service to our custc hers. JM/aw D1-Letters-89/90 • LEROY W. HOOTON,JR. DIRECTOR WENDELLSUP E. EVENSEN,, P.E. ;'�`T ` A` Q',�C�T� ��T}1�V D SUPERINTENDENT »+ �' .4 i iI �jj�r v�+`Ij+��IIJJNJ WATER SUPPLY&WATERWORKS �d E. TIM DOXEY SUPERINTENDENT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER RECLAMATION WATER SUPPLY & WATERWORKS PALMER DEPAULIS JAMES M. LEWIS, C.P.A. WATER RECLAMATION MAYOR CHIEF FINANCE& ACCOUNTING OFFICER 1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE GEORGE JORGENSEN, RE. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 CHIEF ENGINEER June 9, 1989 TO: Members of the City Council FROM: LeRoy Hooton, Jr. L, RE: Proposed Water Indige t atement Program Since the inception of the garbage abatement program the number of customers granted abatements have increased: CITY SERVICE CINIY SERVICE YEAR AREA AREA TOTAL 1987 977 --- --- 1988 1,476 1, 986 3,462 1989 ' 1, 684 2, 221 3, 905 1990 ESTIMATED 1, 900 2, 600 4,500 • Due to the fact that the county program runs on a calendar year basis the numbers used in our calculation are based on 3, 905 customers eligible July- December and 4,500 eligible January-June. This works out to an average of 4, 202 for the proposed budget year 1989-90. To qualify for this program, citizens would have to be granted an indigent abatement for taxes on their dwelling by Salt Lake County under Section 59-7-2 Utah Code Annotated. To qualify a customer must live in the home, make less than $10, 000 a year, and be disabled, widowed, or a hardship case. (See Attachment A Application Form) • Page 2 The cost to the Water Utility Fund depends on the option taken. (See Attachment B) A. Option One $0. 60 per month abatement program would cost $30, 254. The small residential customer who qualifies would realize no increase in rates. If you take into consideration the $0.40 decrease in the sewer charge. B. Option Two . $1 . 00 per month abatement program would cost $50,424. The small residential customer who qualifies would realize no increase in water rates. However, they would benefit from the $0. 40 decrease in sewer rates. • If either option is approved the Capital Improvement Budget for the Water Utility would require adjustment. It would be my recomnendation that the funds budgeted for waterline replacement be reduced. This would require delay of one or two projects until the following fiscal year. ' JML/aw DI-letters-89/90 ATTACHMENT A COUNTY OF SALT LAKE PARCEL N BER : APPLICATION FOR SENIOR CITIZEN & WIDOW/WIDOWER HOMEOWNER ' S PROPERTY TAX CREDIT (CIRCUIT BREAKER) AND/OR INDIGENT ABATEMENT UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 59-7-2 & 59-25-5 . 5 UCA, 1953, AS AMENDED BIRTH DATE SOC. SEC. I Arr'LICANT : / / - - DECEASED: SPOUSE : / / - - / / MAILING I RESIDE AT: ADDRESS: DID YOU RESIDE AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS FOR 10 OF THE PREVIOUS 12 MONTHS? YES NO TELEPHONE NUMBER : ARE YOU FILING AS: NAMES OF ALL OTHER PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER WHO RESIDED AT THE ABOVE UNREMARRIED WIDOW/WIDOWER ADDRESS WITH YOU . UNDER AGE 65 & DISABLED (CURRENT MEDICAL STATEMENT MUST BE ON FILE ) OTHER : EXTREME HARDSHIP (ATTACH A DETAILED EXPLANATION OF HARDSHIP TO APPLICATION) YES NO WILL YOU BE 65 YEARS OLD BEFORE DEC 31 , 1989 OR ARE YOU A WIDOW/WIDOWER? WAS YOUR HOUSEHOLD INCOME FOR 1988 LESS THAN $15, 000 . 00? WILL YOU BE A LEGAL RESIDENT OF UTAH FOR THE ENTIRE YEAR OF 1989? DID YOU OWN AND OCCUPY YOUR RESIDENCE ON JANUARY 1, 1989? DID YOU FURNISH YOUR OWN CHIEF SUPPORT? DOES THE PROPERTY ON WHICH YOUR HOME IS LOCATED, EXCEED ONE ACRE? NO YES IF SO , WHAT IS THE NUMBER OF ACRES? DO YOU RENT OUT A PORTION OF YOUR HOME? NO YES IF SO , WHAT PERCENTAGE? YOU USE A PORTION OF YOUR HOME FOR BUSINESS? NO YES IF SO, WHAT PERCENTAGE? HOUSEHOLD INCOME FOR 1988 LIST ANNUAL INCOME FROM ALL SOURCES RECEIVED BY ALL MEMBERS OF HOUSEHOLD WAGES, SALARIES AND OTHER EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION 1 $ BUSINESS, FARM, PARTNERSHIP , RENT & MISC. INCOME 2 $ DIVIDEND AND INTEREST INCOME 3 $ PENSIONS AND ANNUITIES 4 $ SOCIAL SECURITY AND RAILROAD RETIREMENT 5 $ WELFARE/UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION/ALIMONY/STRIKE BENEFITS. . . 6 . $ INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES ( IDENTIFY SOURCES) 7 $ TOTAL 1988 HOUSEHOLD INCOME FROM ALL SOURCES (TOTAL LINE 1 THRU 7 ) . . . $ THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DOES SWEAR THAT AN ABATEMENT AND/OR CREDIT IS ENTITLED ON THE ABOVE PROPERTY AND THAT THE INFORMATION ON THIS FORM IS CORRECT AND THE INCOME ENTERED IS THE TOTAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME RECEIVED FROM ALL TAXABLE AND NONTAXABLE SOURCES. THE UNDERSIGNED ALSO CERTIFIES THAT THE PROPERTY TAXES HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE PAID AND THERE ARE NO DELINQUENT TAXES ON THE RESIDENCE . SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF SPOUSE ( IF APPLICABLE) ON THIS DAY OF 19 APPEARED BEFORE ME THE APPLICANT AND THE SPOUSE WHO ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY HAVE READ THE FOREGOING, BELIEVE IT IT TO BE TRUE, AND HAVE CAUSED THEIR SIGNATURE TO BE AFFIXED THERETO . COMMISSION EXPIRES : 19 COUNTY OFFICER OR NOTARY PUBLIC (SEAL) RESIDING AT SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH > ATTACHMENT B (PAR I SON )ROGRAM :AL AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL OPTION TWO OPTION ONE OPTION TWO 1.00 NO 0.60 1.00 ABATEMENT ABATEMENT ABATEMENT ABATEMENT 68.40 135.28 135.28 135.28 81.60 91.80 91.80 91.80 150.00 227.08 227.08 227.08 68.40 154.32 147.12 142.32 76.80 86.40 86.40 86.40 145.20 240.72 233.52 228.72 0.00 19.04 11.84 7.04 -4.80 -5.40 -5.40 -5.40 -4.80 13.64 6.44 1.64 -0.40 1.14 0.54 0.14 •i,1t ..Y . Jt , t ti SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1989 (Adding Section 15.16.070 providing fees for Tracy Aviary) AN ORDINANCE ENACTING SECTION 15. 16.070 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE PROVIDING FOR ADMISSION FEES TO TRACY AVIARY. WHEREAS, the City Council believes it appropriate to charge admission fees at certain times and for certain programs at Tracy Aviary. NOW, THEREFORE, Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That Section 15. 16.070 be, and the same hereby is, enacted to read as follows: 15.16.070 Tracy Aviary Fees. Admission and program fees for the Tracy Aviary shall be charged as follows: A. Between April 1 and October 31 of each year, admission fees shall be required except for Monday, and between the hours of 9 :00 a.m. and noon on Saturday, when admission shall be free. In the event that Monday or Saturday during the admission fee period shall be a legally designated state, federal or city holiday, the regular admission fees shall be charged. B. The individual admission fee schedule shall be as follows: Age Price Under 6 Years of Age Free 6 to 12 years $ . 75 13 to 64 years $1 .25 65 years and over $ . 75 Admission fees shall be waived for individuals or families paying yearly membership fees to the Friends of Tracy Aviary, Inc. C. Tour fees. Educational, religious or other organized clubs or groups visiting the Aviary during the periods specified above shall pay the following fees: 1. Unguided tours not accompanied by an Aviary staff member, when reservations are made at least forty-eight hours before the tour, shall pay $. 50 per person under eighteen years old and $. 75 per person over eighteen years old. 2. Guided educational tours shall pay $15 .00 for the first thirty persons and an additional $. 50 for each additional person under the age of eighteen and $ . 75 for each additional person over the age of eighteen. D. Outreach programs. Aviary staff may conduct programs including demonstrations, lectures, field trips or other similar activities as requested at schools, clubs, religious organiza- tions or other similar organizations and shall charge a fee for such programs to be determined by the Director of Parks based on the nature, complexity and expense of each such program. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989 . CHAIRPERSON -2- ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER BRB:pp -3- • - PI. , . ,4 „,„ tc. g SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE F 7 • No. of 198[$]9 (Salt Lake City Corporation Employee Compensation Plan) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.52.010 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, AS LAST AMENDED BY BILL NO. [3'] 44 OF 1988 RELATING TO COMPENSATION OF SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES . Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: ' . SECTION 1. That Section 2.52.010 of the Salt Lake City A"' Code, as last amended by Bill No. [3-] 44 of 1988, be, and 4" is hereby amended as follows: i .Y Sec. 2. 52.010. Compensation Program Adopted. !41A1 A. The Compensation Administration Program for Salt ry Lake City Corporation [ (the "City" )] Employees, dated July 1, 198[$] 9, is hereby adopted as the official compensation plan for said employees (hereinafter referred to as the -"Plan" ) . Three copies of said Plan or any amendment thereto shall be maintained in the City Recorder' s office for public inspection. The provisions of said Plan shall be effective under the terms thereof commencing July 1, 198[8]9, except ' as they may be amended by the City Council or upon approval of Memoranda of Understanding between the City and 7„c w.`- recognized Employee Bargaining units. CV • PA .1r9•jr: f.z i tst B. The. Plan herein .adopted_and any amendment or modification thereto shall not apply to officers or employees whose employment terminated prior to publication of the ordinance codified in this chapter or to the adoption of any amendment or modification to the Plan. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 198[$•]9 . .- Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, ;4 this day of 198[4]9. :„: . CHAIRPERSON T" ATTEST: CITY RECORDER , _ :• Transmitted to the Mayor on t� - `` Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed y _. - . .- ,; ,�' - . . . - MAYOR war. ATTEST: . - CITY RECORDER _ r ` FMN:cc ,.. wy. -2- ep r4 f,•. SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 198[$]9 (Employee Compensation Plan for 400 Series Employees) AN ORDINANCE [ENACTING] AMENDING SECTION 2.52. 115 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE RELATING TO COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS FOR SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 400 SERIES EMPLOYEES. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: • SECTION 1. That Section 2. 52.115 of the Salt Lake City Code, be, and is hereby [cnactcd] amended as follows: Sec. 2. 52. 115 Compensation Plan Adopted - 400 Series Employees. The compensation plan for Salt Lake City . /- J Corporation 400 series employees dated July 1, 198[$] 9 is hereby adopted as the official compensation plan for said employees. Three copies of said plan, or any amendment thereto, shall be maintained in the City Recorder' s Office for public inspection. The provisions of said plan shall be r\_ effective under the terms thereof, commencing July 1, 198[8] 9 and ending June 30, 19[$-9]90, except as they may be amended by the City Council or upon approval of a Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the recognized employee bargaining unit. • The plan herein adopted, and any amendment or modification thereto, shall not apply to employees whose ordinance, or to the adoption of any amendment or modification to the plan. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 198[8]9 . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 198[8]9. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor's Action: DATED this day of , 198[8]9 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER FMN:cc -2- /- r SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1989 (Adopting the final budgets, including the budget for the Library Fund, and employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 and ending June 30, 1990. ) AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE FINAL BUDGETS INCLUDING THE BUDGET FOR THE LIBRARY FUND, AND EMPLOYMENT STAFFING DOCUMENT OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1989 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1990. PREAMBLE Pursuant to the provisions of Section 111, Chapter 6, Title 10, Utah Code Annotated ( 1953, as amended) , the Budget Officer of Salt Lake City Corporation (hereinafter the "City" ) prepared and filed with the City Council a tentative budget in proper form for all funds for which budgets are required by said law, including budgets for the general fund, the library fund, special revenue funds, debt service funds, and the capital improvement funds for fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 and ending June 30, 1990. The budgets were accompanied by a budget message as required by law. The tentative budget, including the budget for the library fund, was reviewed, considered and adopted by the City Council on May 2, 1989 . The tentative budgets, together with all supporting schedules and data, have been available for public inspection in the Office of the City Recorder for at least 10 days. The City Council fixed the time and place for a public hearing to be held on May 16, 1989 to consider the adoption of the tentative budget, including the budget for the library fund, and ordered notice thereof be published as required by Section 113, Chapter 6, Title 10, Utah Code Annotated, ( 1953, as amended) . Notice of said public hearing to consider the adoption of said tentative budget was published as required by law. The public hearing to consider adoption of said tentative budget was held on May 16, 1989, in accordance with said notice, at which hearing all interested parties were heard for and against the estimates of revenue and expenditures. Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10, Utah Code Annotated ( 1953, as amended) requires that before the 15th day of June of each fiscal year, the governing body shall by resolution or ordinance adopt a budget for the ensuing fiscal year for each fund for which a budget is required. All conditions precedent to the final adoption of said budgets have been accomplished. Section 2. 52.020 of the Salt Lake City Code states in part that an employment staffing document shall be adopted as an element of the City' s annual budget, or otherwise, as the City Council may require. Three copies of such document have been filed for use and examination of the public in the Office of the City Recorder. -2- Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . PURPOSE. Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 Utah Code Annotated ( 1953, as amended) requires that before the 15th of June of each year, the governing body shall by resolution or ordinance adopt a budget for the ensuing fiscal year for each fund for which a budget is required. Section 2. 52.020 of the Salt Lake City Code states that an employment staffing document shall be adopted as an element of the City' s annual budget. Since all conditions precedent to the adoption of the final budgets, including the budget for the Library Fund, which includes the employment staffing document, have been accomplished, the purpose of this ordinance is to adopt the final budgets of the City including the budget for the Library Fund, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 and ending June 30, 1990. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF BUDGETS. The budgets attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance, be, and the same hereby are adopted as the budgets of the City for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 and ending June 30, 1990, in accordance with requirements of Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10, Utah Code Annotated ( 1953, as amended) . These adopted budgets are subject to the approval of the Mayor and reconsideration of the City Council pursuant to Section 1214, Chapter 3, Title 10, Utah Code Annotated ( 1953, as amended) and to completion of any notice and hearing -3- requirements mandated by Chapter 2, Title 59, Utah Code Annotated ( 1953 as amended) . SECTION 3 . EMPLOYMENT STAFFING. An employment staffing document, three copies of which are filed for use and examination in the Office of the City Recorder, is hereby adopted as an element of the final budget, pursuant to Section 2. 52.020 of the Salt Lake City Code. SECTION 4. FILING OF BUDGETS . The City Budget Officer is hereby authorized and directed to certify and file copies of said budgets with the State Auditor as required by the provisions of Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10, Utah Code Annotated ( 1953 ) , as amended) , . SECTION 5. PUBLIC INSPECTION. The City Budget Officer is hereby authorized and directed to certify and file copies of said budgets in the office of said Budget Officer and in the Office of the City Recorder, which budgets shall be available for public inspection during regular business hours as required by Section 119, Chapter 6, Title 10, Utah Code Annotated ( 1953, as amended) . SECTION 6 . EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1989 . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989 . CHAIRPERSON -4- ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER FMN:cc APPROVED AP TO f'OPM Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date — - By IM •// AWS;ii -5- • /00111.11 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE. No. of 1989 (Determining the rate of tax levy and levying taxes upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, Utah made taxable by law for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1989 and ending June 30, 1990. AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE RATE OF TAX LEVY AND LEVYING TAXES UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY WITHIN SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MADE TAXABLE BY LAW FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1989 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1990. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Chapter 2, Title 59 Utah Code Annotated ( 1953 as amended) , states that before June 22nd of each year the governing body of each City, shall, by ordinance or resolution, set the real and personal property tax levy for various municipal purposes. Chapter 2, Title 59, Utah Code Annotated ( 1953 as amended) provides for certain notice and hearing requirements if the proposed tax rate exceeds the certified tax rate. It is the intent of Salt Lake City Corporation to comply with the mandate of the Utah Legislature, but reserve in itself the power to amend the tax rates set herein to guarantee, after final appraisal figures have been determined, that it does not exceed the amount required for its governmental operations and taxing authority granted by the Legislature. • 411 • SECTION 2. For purposes _of defraying the necessary and proper expenses of the City to maintain the government thereof and; for operating and maintaining its libraries and reading rooms, the City Council hereby levies upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, Utah made taxable by law in the year 1989, for the fiscal year of Salt Lake City ending June 30, 1990, a tax of percent on each dollar of taxable evaluation of said property, apportioned as follows: (a) percent shall be credited as revenue in the general fund; (b) percent shall be credited as revenue in the special library fund. Said .tax levy shall be subject to Mayor approval and City Council reconsideration pursuant to Section 1214, Chapter 3, Title 10, Utah Code Annotated (1953 as amended) . SECTION 3. The proposed tax levy does not exceed the certified tax rate and, therefore, the City is not required to publish notice or hold a public hearing pursuant to Chapter 2,. Title 59, Utah Code Annotated (1953 as amended) . SECTION 4. The tax levy hereinabove determined and levied shall be certified by the City Recorder to the Auditor of Salt Lake County, State of Utah before the 22nd day of June 1989 pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 2, Title 59, Utah Code Annotated ( 1953 as amended) . -2- SECTION 5 . The City hereby expressly reserves the power and right to amend any property tax levy made herein as it may deem just, proper and appropriate under the law. SECTION 6 . This Ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1989 . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1989 . SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By Chairperson ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake CZ Attorn ey's Office DateG'-11��w"� Transmitted to the Mayor on the day of , 1989 . Mayor' s action: DATED this day of , 1989 . PALMER DePAULIS Mayor -3- ' (-\,j1-,c -ilivbe'lt (7h4 /i2 MOTIONS Item F5 WATER AND SEWER RATE ORDINANCE Option 1 . I move that we adopt an ordinance amending Sections 17. 16. 670, 17. 16.680 and 17. 72.030 of the Salt Lake City Code to reflect an increase in City water rates to $. 42 for City residents and $. 62 for non-City residents offset by a decrease in sewer rates to $. 80 as proposed by the Department of Public Utilities. Option 2. I move that we adopt an ordinance amending Sections 4 17. 16.670, 17. 16.680 and 17. 72. 030 of the Salt Lake City Code to reflect an increase in City water rates offset by a decrease in sewer rates as proposed by the Department of Public Utilities; and establishing a low-income abatement program. (This option will require ratification on Thursday, June 15, 1989. ) `►L k Option 3. I move that we adopt an ordinance amending Sections �% �� 17. 16.670, 17. 16. 680 and 17.72.030 of the Salt Lake City Code to reflect an increase in City water rates to $. 43 for City 10 residents and $.64 for non-City residents offset by a decrease in Vsewer rates to $.80; and increasing the minimum charge to $6. 45. \c q Option 4. I move that we adopt an ordinance amending Sections wk � \ 017. 16. 670, 17 . 16.680 and 17.72. 030 of the Salt Lake City Code to ,�(� reflect an increase in City water rates to $. 44 for City G ,tt11 residents and $.65 for non-City residents offset by a decrease in �J " sewer rates to $.80; and increasing the minimum charge to $6.20. Item F6 TRACY AVIARY FEES I move that we adopt an ordinance enacting Section 15. 16.070 of k7) . the Salt Lake City Code to reflect an increase in Tracy Aviary entrance fees. OL ( Indicate at what level the fees should be set. ) Item F7 COMPENSATION PLAN - 300 and Executive Series I move that we adopt an ordinance amending Section 2. 52.010 of (.9V/ the Salt Lake City Code as last amended by Bill No. 44 of 1988 relating to compensation of Salt Lake City Corporation Officers and Employees. 1 Item FS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - SALT LAKE CITY POLICE ASSOCIATI❑N I move that the resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt ;,' Lake City Police Association be tabled to July 11 , 1989, pending ratification of the contract by the Union membership. THE ADMINISTRATION IS STILL IN NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIREFIGHTERS UNION. THE ADMINISTRATION WOULD LIKE YOU TO TABLE BOTH OPTIONS TO JULY 11 , IN CASE THEY ARE ABLE TO COME TO AGREEMENT WITH THE UNION. Item F9 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - IFA -- LOCAL 1645 6,,y I move that the resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Firefighters Association , Local 1645 be tabled until July 11 , 1989, pending ratification of the contract by the Union membership. Item F10 COMPENSATI❑N PLAN - 400 Series or-- I move that the ordinance amending Section 2. 52. 115 of the Salt Lake City Code relating to compensation and benefits for Salt Lake City Corporation 400 Series Employees be tabled to July 11 , 1989. Item F11 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - AFSCME - LOCAL 1004 - 200 SERIES I move that the resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American UIL Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Local 1004 for Salt Lake City Corporation 's 200 Series Employees be tabled until July 11 , 1989, pending ratification of the contract by the Union membership. Item F12 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - AFSCME - LOCAL 1004 - 100 SERIES I move that the resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Local 1004 r)t/ for Salt Lake City Corporation 's 100 Series Employees be tabled until July 11 , 1989, pending ratification of the contract by the Union membership. "Of Inat ' ;d /r11--U'a l'iQ -111-61 ct.,‘) 66\ (1-4-6 -L-1-11-;-1- 5 t9t' -9-121( (L(2---61‘*)44) FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 BUDGETS ( Items noted by ** are required to fund the Mayor 's labor package) (Items noted by TAC have been Tentatively Approved by Council ) (Other motions listed have been discussed in Committee of the Whole but did not receive support of the Council majority) Item F13 REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS ENTERPRISE FUNDS PUBLIC UTILITIES I move that we decrease Water Utility fund projected ,�n revenues by $-30,254 to reflect the implementation of a low- income income abatement program. (This motion is valid only with Option 2 on the fee ordinance is chosen. ) GENERAL FUND I move that we adjust the General Fund revenues to reflect -A current projections as follows: Increase the projected t4 property tax revenue by $294, 172 and decrease projected franchise tax collections by $120,640. ** I move that we increase General Fund revenue projections (J"\>;0'r by $100,000 to reflect a transfer from the Central Fire Dispatch fund balance. ** I move that we increase General Fund revenue projections /r L by an additional $47,600 to reflect a transfer from the Worker 's Compensation fund balance. ** I move that we increase General Fund revenue projections by an additional $63,844 reflecting the d\* repayment of the PEHP deficit. W h'1 0 4 , TAC I move that we increase General Fund revenue fund .4 projections by an additional $.?0,000 to reflect an increase k1� G�J1 in Tracy Aviary entrance fees. t6L . . TAC I move that we increase General Fund revenue projections (.) '4- b.:r an additional $. 0,000 to reflect a reimbursement by the State for election costs. EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS ENTERPRISE FUNDS 61\y- AIRPORT ** I move that we decrease the Airport fund contribution to 0 employee health insurance premiums by $ 1 ,800. \0 ��5? it ** I move that we increase the Airport fund administrative 1� service charges paid to the General Fund by $9,657. ** I move that we increase the Airport fund contingency by $12, 143. I move that $7,275 be transferred from Airport fund auto allowances to Airport contingency reflecting a 25% reduction in auto allowances. 6'c\iREFUSE COLLECTION FUND ** I move that we decrease the Refuse Collection fund lgcontribution to employee health insurance premiums by $2,668. ** I move that we increase the Refuse Collection fund administrative service charges paid to the General Fund by cPr $1 ,569. ** I move that we increase the Refuse Collection fund .0,,f contingency by $1 ,099. 4 GOLF COURSE FUND i' ** I move that we decrease the Golf Course fund contribution to employee health insurance premiums by $4,212. ** I move that we increase the Golf Course fund El' administrative service charges paid to the General Fund by $2,454. ** I move that we increase the Golf Course fund contingency b -$1 ,758. (I^(�L$ � AC I move that we transfer $20 726 from the Golf Course V11 fund personal services to contingency and eliminate 2. 08 FTE ` K reflecting the elimination of .-35 FTE seasonal golf marshal U1?`211 and 1 . 73 FTE golf seasonal grounds keepers. *,\M I move that $234 be transferred from Golf Course Fund auto allowance to Golf Course Fund contingency reflecting a 25% reduction in auto allowances. PUBLIC UTILITIES O %, ** I move that we decrease the Water Utility contribution to 'lam �Q employee health insurance premiums by $35,376. / ** I move that we increase the Water Utility administrative 6\;,--- er service charges paid to the General Fund by $20,709. 4? ** I move that we increase the Water Utility fund contingency by $•14,667. ;� ** I move that we decrease the Sewer Utility contribution to �' ' employee health insurance premiums by $15,084. ** 1 move that we increase the Sewer Utility fund administrative service charges paid to the General Fund by $8,831 . ** I move that we increase the Sewer Utility fund 6,,,Li contingency by $6,253. / I move that we decrease the Water Utility capital improvement fund budget by $30,254 reflecting a decrease in 0 revenues as a result of the low--income abatement program. (This motion is valid only if Option 2 on the fee change / ordinance is chosent ) QQ_ ( I fL -kfrQ( - des(, Q Re t�� o"a- C lid,(��,`� I move that $1 ,862 be transferred from Water Utility auto allowances to Water Utility contingency reflecting a 25X reduction in auto allowances. I move that $1 ,425 be transferred from Sewer Utility auto allowances to Sewer Utility contingency reflecting a 25% reduction in auto allowances. GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTS ACROSS THE BOARD06/(P(.1 0 ** I move that we decrea the General Fund contribution to employee health ' sura e premiums by $230,831. ** I move that we decrease Risk Management premiums paid by all funds by a total of $9,397 to be applied department by department as follows: Finance: $ 696 Police: 2,898 Public Works: 1 ,536 Parks and Recreation: 967 Community and Economic Development: 421 Administrative Services: 390 Mayor: 86 Fire Department: 2,091 Attorney 's Office: 115 Human Resource Management: 120 Council Office: 77 $9,397 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ** I move that we decrease the Fleet Maintenance Internal 61/k/-7 Service fund charge for employee health insurance premiums 01 by $9,304. ** I move that we increase the Fleet Maintenance Internal V Service fund administrative service charge paid to the General Fund by 5,453. ** I move that we increase the Fleet Maintenance Internal A' Service fund contingency by $3,851. i ** I move that we decrease the Information Management / Services Internal Service fun© charge for employee health vj insurance premiums by $6,048. 6 ** I move that we increase the Information Management C ,%e Services Internal Service fund administrative service charge paid to the General Fund by 3,533. \, ** I move that we increase the Information Management Services Internal Service fund contingency by $2,515. ** I move that we increase the Fleet Management Internal_ Service Fund appropriation of fund balance by $55,000. ** TAC I move that we decrease Fleet Management Internal Service Fund revenues from the General Fund by $155,000. TAC I move that the Administrative Services Election budget be increased by $30,000 to cover the costs of a statewide referendum. TAC I move that we decrease the Administrative Services, Office of the Director , by $101 ,427 to reflect the elimination of two FTEs as a result of consolidation of the Departments of Administrative Services and Human Resource Management. TAC I move that we decrease the Administrative Services, Fleet Replacement Fund, by $100,000 to be a net reduction accommodating offsetting increased maintenance costs. I move that $750 be transferred from Information Management Services Internal Service fund auto allowances to Information Management Services Internal Service fund contingency reflecting a 25% reduction in auto allowances. ATTORNEY 61 ** I move that we decrease the Governmental Immunity Internal Service fund charge for employee health insurance premiums by $320. '/r ** I move that we increase the Governmental Immunity V ,4 Internal Service fund administrative service charges paid to the General Fund by $186. ** I move that we increase the Governmental Immunity j ' Internal Service fund contingency by $134. I move that we decrease the Attorney 's Office travel /training budget by $4,887. I move that $900 be transferred from Attorney 's Office auto allowance to Attorney 's Office contingency reflecting a 25% reduction in auto allowances. CITY COUNCIL I move that we decrease the City Council Office budget by ij ;> $1 ,512 to reflect a correction of Council Member salaries. COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAC I move that we increase general fund transfers to the i; --°' Demolition Special Revenue fund by $5,000 to meet existing needs. I move that $3,258 be transferred from Community and Economic Development auto allowance to Community and Economic Development contingency reflecting a 25% decrease in auto allowances. FINANCE TAC I move that the Finance Department budget be reduced by . G 0 , $76 90 eliminatingfunding for one Internal Auditor. ►e � tk c-}'v\C �L F 10e_ /La c 1 c� TAC I move that we reduce the Finance Department budget by $27,540 to eliminate funding for land rentals which was budgeted under the Parks Department CIE' fund. TAC I move that we reduce the Finance Department budget by 41_, 2,610 to eliminate funding for employee parking which was budgeted under Support Services. I move that $900 be transferred from Finance Department auto xallowance to Finance Department contingency reflecting a 25% reduction in auto allowances. FIRE DEPARTMENT ** I move that we decrease the E911 Dispatch Special Revenue 041 fund charges for employee health insurance premiums by $1 ,344. f ,: ** I move that we increase the E911 Dispatch Special Revenue wr fund administrative service fee charges paid to the General ��` Fund by $789. **- I move that we increase the E911 Dispatch Special Revenue fund contingency by $555. Au ** I move that we appropriate $100,000 of Central Fire Dispatch fund balance to transfers to the General Fund. I move that we decrease the Fire Department operations bureau by $`.000 to reflect the elimination of one dispatcher. 8 I move that $2,547 be transferred from Fire Department auto allowance to Fire Department contingency reflecting a 25% reduction in auto allowance. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ),T ** I move that we decrease the Risk Management Internal C4Service fund charges for employee health insurance premiums by $1 . 140 , ** I move that we increase the Risk Management Internal Service fund administrative service fee charges paid to the General Fund by $665. j4 ** I move that we increase the Risk Management Internal /U "`JJN Service fund contingency by $555. ** I move that we reduce the Risk Management Internal Service fund payment to PEHP by $242,000 and reduce br- insurance premium revenues by $242,000. ** I move that we reduce the Risk Management Internal Service fund contribution to fund balance by $191 ,599. 0147 ** I move that we appropriate $47,600 of Worker 's Compensation fund balance to transfers to the General Fund. itk1 TAC I move that we decrease the Risk Management Internal Lap9 Service fund by $20,000 to reflect the elimination of the jt Section 69 consulting fees. (' I move that $900 be transferred from Human Resource Management auto allowance to Human Resource Management contingency reflecting a 25% reduction in auto allowances. I move that we reduce the Human Resource Management budget by $•9,000 eliminating the employee newspaper. I move that we reduce the Human Resource Management budget \(\j by $8,900 eliminating funding for retiree gifts. I move that we reduce the Human Resource Management budget by $6,000 eliminating funding for employee appreciation day. PARKS & RECREATION TAC I move that we increase the Parks Department Aviary fund 1 dot./ by $30,000 to reflect an increase in aviary entrance fees to 1 r e fund the Security Contract at the aviary. (i) TAC I move that we decrease Parks Department personal services by $10,603 reflecting a delay in hiring of the jRecreation Manager for 3 months. I move that we decrease the Parks Department , Urban Forestry budget by $20,000. I move that $493 be transferred from Parks Department auto allowance to Parks Department contingency reflecting a 25% reduction in auto allowances. I move that we decrease the Parks Department Recreation Program by $35,660 and eliminate one FTE to reflect the elimination of the Parks Recreation Manager position. POLICE I move that we decrease the Police Department travel/training budget by $6,200. I move that $4,032 be transferred from Police Department auto allowance to Police Department contingency reflecting a 25% reduction in auto allowances. PUBLIC WORKS k/ TAC I move that we increase the Public Works Department budget by $277,586 for the restoration of the Neighborhood , Trash Pickup. TAC I move that we decrease the Public Works Department travel/training budget by $3, 109. I move that we decrease the Public Works Department , business district maintenance budget by $75,000. I move that $4,348 be transferred from Public Works auto allowance to Public Works contingency reflecting a 25% reduction in auto allowances. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I move that the Capital Improvement Program budget be increased by $430,000 for the California Avenue project to reflect an increase in property owner assessments. 10 I move that the Capital Improvement Program, Central Business_ District Beautification Projects be increased by $420,000 to be funded $210,000 from Redevelopment Agency Tax Increment funds and $210,000 from property owner assessments. I move that the Capital Improvement Program, Main Street C, j Drainage Improvement Project between South Temple and 300 JSouth be increased by $20,000 to be funded from Redevelopment Agency Tax increment funds. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: In order to complete the Sunnyside Recreation Center Project , staff used the assumption that you would want to use the extra property tax revenues to pay for the engineering fees. If this is not the case, the numbers in the following motions will change depending on where you want to get the engineering Tees from. I move that the Capital Improvement Program, Fire Station (SS #10 Construction Project be reduced by $450,000; with the �`}} funds transferred to CIP Contingency and designated for Sunnyside Recreation Center. I move that the Capital Improvement Program, Sunnyside / Recreation Center Project be decreased by $100,000; with the funds transferred to CIP Contingency and designated for Sunnyside Recreation Center.4 I move that the Capital Improvement ovement Program ram Contingency be0)1 e NC• 1 increased by $63,532 and designated for the Sunnyside Recreation Center Engineering Fees. I move that the Capital Improvement Program, Fire Station #10 Construction Project be reduced by $6,468; with the funds transferred to CIP Contingency and designated for Sunnyside Recreation Center Engineering Fees. (Note: These last two motions add up to the $70,000 required for Project Engineering Fees) . ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: If you decide to take the Sunnyside Engineering Fees from the Fire Station #10 Project, you will need the following motion: I move that the Capital Improvement Program, Fire Station #10 Construction Project be decreased by $70,000; with the funds transferred to CIP Contingency and designated as Sunnyside Recreation Center Engineering Fees. 11 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 6\1 *-* TAC I move that we decrease transfers to the Fleet Maintenance Internal Service fund by $155,000. • TAC I move that we increase the Municipal Affairs budget by $10,000 to reflect an increase in Utah League of Cities and Towns dues. TAC I move that we increase transfers to the demolition fund by : 5,000. I move that the General Fund contingency be increased by $6=,5 32. (NOTE: If you passed the motion putting $63,532 into Sunnyside Recreation Center Engineering Fees, Do Not Make This Motion) . I move that we decrease the Municipal Affairs budget by $10,000 to reflect an elimination of funding for the Veteran 's Cemetery. \O- I move that we decrease the Municipal Affairs budget by $10,000 to reflect an elimination of funding for the increase in Salt Lake City Chamber of Commerce dues. I move that we decrease the Municipal Affairs budget by $10,000 to reflect an elimination of funding for the Sister City program. I move that we decrease the Municipal Affairs budget by $20,000 reducing the contribution to Utah Economic Development Corporation. LIBRARY g I move that we increase the Library Fund contingency by $=5,6.30. (Note: The increase is the difference in initial projected property tax and revised property tax estimates as of June 12, 1989. 12 GENERAL MOTIONS I move that we approve the 1989-90 General Fund budget totaling and all other budgets as presented by the Mayor and altered by Council motion, and adopt an ordinance adopting irbudgets of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the Library Fund budget totaling $6,039,42 , for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1 , 1989, and ending June 30, 1990. ill(c__ V ASK LEE FOR NUMBER DURING THE MEETING. Q� �� e Item F 14 ` � lJ�- I� �� V I move that we adopt an ordinance establishing the tax rate for the general fund at . 004360 and the Library Fund at .000867 for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1 , 1989, and ending June 30, 1990. ASK LEE FOR NUMBER DURING THE MEETING. \ moue jhoj Q.- WILLIE GOLF SUBSTITUTE MOTION I move that we transfer $3,680 from the Golf Course fund personal services to contingency and eliminate . 35 FTE reflecting the elimination of a seasonal golf marshal . rLAN PROPERTY TAX SURPLUS SUBSTITUTE NOTION NOTE: This motion will be made to account for the property tax surplus of $63,532. I move that we increase the Governmental Immunity Internal Service Fund contingency by $63,532. 14 re=-6— FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 LEGISLATIVE INTENTS 1 . It is the intent of the City Council that the Administration formalize a coordinated plan for the joint economic development of the Northwest Quadrant and the Airport. That plan should define the role of the Airport in the process, address needed improvements in the Northwest Quadrant and should accommodate the extension of California Avenue all the way ter West, with the eventual goal of connecting into the West Valley Highway. go()) 2. It is the intent of the City Council that the Administration conduct a / O vehicle utilization study to determine if the number of vehicles in each ` department is fully justified. 3. It is the intent of the City Council that the Administration work with the Sugar House Park Authority to increase the public usage of the park through /,/(V promotion of additional outdoor events. It is also the Council 's intent that maintenance costs be reviewed to ensure that funds budgeted for the Sugar House Park Authority are used in the most efficient manner. 4. It is the intent of the City Council that the Parks Department study the policy of charging sports leagues for maintenance of baseball and soccer fields, with approval of the Council prior to the implementation of the policy. 5. It is the intent of the City Council that the Administration begin negotiations with Salt Lake County to effectuate reimbursement for City ') property owners paying property taxes for Emergency Medical Services to the t/ County while receiving the same service from the City. It is the further intent of the City Council that the Fire Department complete a study of the feasibility of establishing user fees for Paramedic services. 6. It is the intent of the City Council that a study be conducted to evaluate /1/0 the Fire Department 's consolidated dispatch operations, with funding to come from the Council's Auditing Budget. 7. It is the intent of the City Council that the Administration develop a 4-2. i policy discouraging the hiring of personnel on a contractual basis beyond ah- .j( month period. 12 5‘') I ' t e intent of C'ty Council that Administrat' -eat-i w the r nance f polic aloe ala fees a eport b ck to e Council ith „._ t , t roposed solut on f if Do cl. , a) q a G n 9. It is the intent of the City Council that the Administration gnu i s process erf r w g requests for school crossing. guards. 10. It is the intent of the City Council that the Administration report to the Council the cost to the City associated with those employee groups who have opted out of ocial security. /;/% PAGE TWO 11 . It is the intent of the City Council that the Administration develop a plan for funding the Refuse Collection Fund on a self-sustaining basis, for presentation to the City Council by February 1990. 12. It is the intent of the City Council that the Administration continue to lay the foundation for a performance based compensation system and be prepared ito to implement such a plan, or pilot program in the 1990-91 fiscal year. It is the further intent of the Council that the Administration report to the 4j1{‘ Council prior to the implementation of such a plan or pilot program. 13. It is the intent of the City Council that the Administration develop an alternative physical fitness incentive program that would enable qualifying employees to trade accrued vacation, compensatory time, or sick leave for membership in fitness centers. / 14. It is the intent of the City Council that the Administration include in , }t� the Fiscal Year 1990-91 Capital Improvements Budget funding for the completion VVV of the construction of Fire Station 10. 15. It is the intent of the City Council that a quarterly report of the status of the legislative intent statements be provided by the Administration. 16. It is the intent of the City Council that any slippage from prior year YCDBG projects which becomes available during 1989-90 be applied towards the Community Development Corporation and that Capital Planning report at least semiannually on the availability of slippage. *** Council staff previously suggested the two following intents (#17 & 18). However, Council staff now withdraws these recommendations because the vote record and minutes of the Tuesday, May 16 CDBG action session clarified the Council's intent. Staff is now proposing that you adopt the above intent (#16) relating to slippage in order to ensure appropriate tracking. 17. It is the intent of the City Council that the Administration put out to bid and CDAC review the Security Lock Program and make a recommendation to the Council as to the most appropriate organization to administer the program. 18. It is the intent of the City Council that funding for SLACC staffing be allocated but not appropriated until the issues regarding the SLACC recognition ordinance, new projects, and SLACC staffing are resolved. Y(/