Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
06/05/1990 - Minutes (2)
PROCDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of the Whole on Tuesday, June 5, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. in Room 325, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Don Hale Nancy Pace Council Chair Hardman presided at the meeting. The meeting was called to Ms. Gust-Jenson said that order at 5: 10 p.m. Councilmember Councilmember Kirk had requested Hardman asked Ms. Gust-Jenson to the resolution to honor Grant Fry brief the Council. for his community efforts. Councilmember Hardman asked if EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BRIEFING Councilmember Kirk would read the resolution to acknowledge Mr. Fry. Ms. Gust-Jenson said the Utah Councilmember Kirk said she would. Hotel/Motel Association and Bill Peifer, from the Residence Inn/ Councilmember Hardman asked Marriot, had provided letters Councilmember Godfrey to read the expressing concern if the Council resolution on the Salt Palace adopted the resolution concerning expansion. Councilmember Godfrey the implementation of a new ho- said he would. tel/motel tax to fund the Salt Palace improvements. She said Councilmember Hardman said this was item E-5 on tonight' s Councilmember Whitehead would be agenda. conducting the meeting. Councilmember Pace said KSL Councilmember Pace said a radio interviewed her on this hotel operator had "threatened" issue and she had said that the legal action if the Council ap- Council would be approving/ dis- proved the Salt Palace expansion approving the resolution only. resolution. No decision had been made concern- ing implementation of fees. Councilmember Hardman asked if the Council would be receiving Ms. Gust-Jenson said one word any public comments. Ms. Gust- in the Salt Palace renovation Jenson said Charles Krauser would resolution had been changed. speak to the Council about funding Councilmember Kirk said she would the International Peace Gardens prefer to have the resolution greenhouse and Gordon Ottley of state "tourist related industry" AFSCME would also be speaking to instead of "hotel. " Ms. Gust- the Council. Jenson said if Councilmember Kirk wanted to change the word "hotel" , Ms. Gust-Jenson said Buzz she would need to request an Hunt and Cheryl Cook would brief amendment to the resolution, since the Council on the Tax and Revenue the majority of the Council had Anticipation Notes during the not made the request. briefing session. 90-199 411 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1990 Ms. Gust-Jenson said the indicate their answers on the Council Staff was recommending a sheet and return them to the continuance on Item G-1 regarding Council staff. He said these the street closure at 400-500 West sheets should be turned in by and South Temple to accommodate Wednesday. the petitioner, Union Pacific Railroad. Councilmember Hardman said a Committee of the Whole meeting Ms. Gust-Jenson said the would be conducted following the Council had received prior brief- Council meeting. ings on Item G-2, airport zoning and height regulations, and would TAX ANTICIPATION REVENUE BONDS not receive another tonight. Councilmember Hardman asked Ms. Gust-Jenson said Item G-4 Buzz Hunt and Cheryl Cook to brief should state ordinance #36, not the Council on the Tax Anticipa- #35, and Councilmember Whitehead tion Revenue Bonds. should mention this at the time the item was addressed. Mr. Hunt said this was a safe investment that would enable the Councilmember Hardman asked City to purchase bonds at a 5.8% who had petitioned the rezoning interest rate, with a return of for American Stores. Janice 8.485% on their investment. Jardine of the Planning Department said the petitioner was Osco. Councilmember Pace asked if there was a size or time limit on Ms. Gust-Jenson said that the bonds. Mr. Hunt indicated Hans Peterson from KALL radio that these bonds fell under the wanted to interview one of the safe harbor provision. The City Councilmembers about the parade could only invest for 12 months in ordinance on June 8, at 2:00 or the bonds and if the City exceeded June 11, at 2:00 or 3:45. the 90% debt reserve limit, the Councilmember Godfrey agreed to be Internal Revenue Service would tax interviewed on June 11, at 3:45 the interest earned. p.m. Councilmember Pace asked when Ms. Gust-Jenson said Council- the City would close on the bonds member Whitehead was working with if the Council approved them. Mr. constituents in District One who Hunt said the City would close on had recommended that Salt Lake the first day of the fiscal year City express the desire to build for 1991, which would be July 2, the oval speedskating rink at the 1990. State Fair Grounds if Ogden City did not choose to pursue this Mr. Hunt said the tax antici- development. Ms. Gust-Jenson said pation notes needed to be autho- Councilmember Whitehead would keep rized expediently and the City the Council informed on this would accept sealed bids. issue. Councilmember Hardman asked how many companies would participate Councilmember Hardman remind- in the bid process. Ms. Cook said ed the Council that they had not 125 firms would receive the bid discussed the Council Staff' s proposals. recommended legislative intents, and that the Council had agreed to 90-200 • PROCDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1990 Mr. Hunt said there were two 500 West South Temple, or wait resolutions that the Council would until the public hearing on July need to approve to initiate the 17th. The Council agreed they tax anticipation bonds. He said would wait until July 17, 1990. the resolution the Council was being asked to approve tonight The meeting was adjourned at would enable the City to distrib- 5:40 p.m. ute the notice of sale and the second resolution, which would be presented on June 12, 1990, would allow the City to accept sealed bids. Councilmember Hardman asked if the Council had any further questions. Councilmember Hale asked if tax anticipation bonds were similar to a revenue note, by allowing the City to purchase bonds at a tax exempt rate and invest these funds at a higher interest rate. Mr. Hunt said that was correct. Councilmember Horrocks asked if the City was involved in arbi- trage rebates. Mr. Hunt said the City could participate in these rebates but had not done so be- cause they would be required to pay back any interest earned on an arbitrage rebate. Councilmember Hardman thanked Mr. Hunt and Ms. Cook for the briefing. Councilmember Hardman indi- cated that Ms. Gust-Jenson had two additional items to brief the Council on. Ms. Gust-Jenson said Scott Gallow would be present to address the Council during the citizen comments concerning the issue of his son being bitten by a neigh- bor' s dog. She said Mr. Gallow would ask the Council to consider a revision to the city ordinance which addressed such situations. Ms. Gust-Jenson asked if the Council wanted Doug Dansie to brief them on the closure at 400- 90-201 • PROCDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Regular Session on Tuesday, June 5, 1990, at 6:00 p.m. in Room 315, City Council Chambers, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Don Hale Nancy Pace Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Lynda Domino, Chief Deputy City Recorder, and S.R. Kivett, Deputy Recorder, were present. Council Chair Hardman presided at the meeting and Councilmember Whitehead conducted the meeting. OPENING CEREMONIES motion carried, all members voted aye. #1. Police Chaplain Jake (R 90-1) Ortega gave the invocation. #5. The Council considered a #2. The Council led the resolution concerning its position Pledge of Allegiance. on funding the Salt Palace expan- sion. Councilmember Godfrey read #3. Councilmember Godfrey the resolution which stated that moved and Councilmember Hardman the Council strongly supported the seconded to approve the minutes of expansion of the Salt Palace the Salt Lake City Council for the facilities and would seek to fund regular meetings held Tuesday, May the expansion with revenues de- 15, 1990, Tuesday, May 22, 1990, rived from increasing user fees on Thursday, May 24, 1990, and Tues- businesses which directly benefit- day, May 29, 1990, which motion ed from Salt Palace activities. carried, all members voted aye except Councilmembers Pace and Councilmember Godfrey moved Hale who were absent for the vote. and Councilmember Hardman seconded (M 90-1) to adopt Resolution 67 of 1990, which motion carried, all members #4. The Council considered a voted aye. resolution honoring the community (R 90-1) efforts of Mr. Grant Fry. Mr. Fry was a key player in negotiating COMMENTS solutions to the traffic problems associated with the expansion of #1. Scott Gallow said his the Foothill Village Shopping one-year old son was severely Center. Councilmember Kirk read bitten by his neighbor' s dog and the resolution and, along with his son would possibly be disfig- Mayor DePaulis, presented it to ured for life. He said he was Mr. Fry. trying to seek justice and resti- tution but part of the problem was Councilmember Kirk moved and that the municipal ordinance Councilmember Godfrey seconded to regarding dogs was formulated in adopt Resolution 66 of 1990, which such as way as to prevent his 90-202 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1990 neighbor from being brought up on said 99% of the time they sup- criminal charges. He said if the ported the Council ' s projects. dog was "restrained" the neighbor But he said employees thought they was not liable for a criminal had fallen on the Council ' s prior- citation. ity ladder. He said he didn't think the Mayor's Office had been He said the ordinance did not as serious as they could during anticipate a situation which arose negotiations. He asked the Coun- with his son. The neighbor' s tree cil not to circumvent the bargain- had blown down which destroyed a ing process by passing a budget section of fence. He said his son that didn't meet employees ' needs. crawled through this section before he could get to him. He He said they had proposals at said if people insisted on keeping the bargaining table that could large hunting dogs in city neigh- save money without cutting servic- borhoods with small yards, then es. He asked the Council to the municipal ordinance should closely consider the package they take into account potential situa- had put together. tions involving both criminal and civil liability. #4. Hazel Harrison, chairman of the International Peace Gar- He said the ordinance should dens, said many people gave their be stricter than just requiring a time and talent to keep the peace large, potentially vicious dog to gardens operating and the peace be "restrained" . He urged the gardens were very popular. She Council to consider strengthening expressed concern that if the city ordinances in such a way to greenhouse was demolished they cause dog owners to assure safety wouldn' t have enough flowers for for those who innocently enter the peace garden. She suggested their property. it would be very costly to trans- port the plants from Liberty Park. Councilmember Godfrey said he talked to the City Attorney who CONSENT AGENDA would contact Mr. Gallow. Councilmember Godfrey moved #2. Charlie Krauser, chair- and Councilmember Hardman second- man of the Swiss Peace Garden, ed to approve the consent agenda, said the Peace Garden played an which motion carried, all members important part in Salt Lake City. voted aye. He urged the Council to continue funding the greenhouse at the #1. RE: Approving the ap- peace garden so the necessary pointment of Celia (CeCie) Schar- flowers would be available. He man to the Recreation Advisory said he thought there were other Board. areas where the city could save (I 90-7) money rather than cutting funds to the peace garden. #2. RE: Approving the ap- pointment of Terri Hartlauer to #3. Gordon Ottley, AFSCME, the Golf Advisory Board. addressed the budget process (I 90-5) regarding employee raises. He said the employees were partners with the City Council in the operations of Salt Lake City. He 90-203 S III PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1990 #3. RE: Approving the ap- portion of an alley between War- pointment of Kimball Young to the nock Avenue and Division Lane, Recreation Advisory Board. 156.35 feet west of 600 East, (I 90-7) pursuant to Petition 400-798-90. (P 90-185) #4. RE: Approving the ap- pointment of Colleen Minson to the #10. RE: Adopting Ordinance Library Board. 39 of 1990 amending Subsection A (I 90-13) of Title 2, Chapter 56, Section 150 of the Salt Lake City Code #5. RE: Approving the ap- relating to conveyance for value. pointment of Kenneth Louder to the (0 90-26) Urban Forestry Board. (I 90-15) NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS #6. RE: Setting a date to #1. RE: A resolution autho- hold a nonadvertised hearing on rizing the advertisement for sale July 10, 1990, at 6:30 p.m. to of $17, 500, 000 Tax and Revenue receive public comment and consid- Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 of er adopting an ordinance vacating Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, a portion of an alley between Utah; and authorizing the distri- Wilson Avenue and Downington bution of an Official Statement Avenue, 125 feet east of 900 East, and Official Notice of Sale for pursuant to Petition 400-793-90. such notes. (P 90-184) ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey #7. RE: Adopting Resolution moved and Councilmember Kirk 64 of 1990 authorizing the execu- seconded to adopt Resolution 68 tion of an interlocal cooperation of 1990, which motion carried, all agreement between Salt Lake City members voted aye. Corporation and Utah Department of (Q 90-5) Transportation providing for the city to sweep UDOT streets for one PUBLIC HEARINGS year at UDOT's expense. (C 90-290) #1. RE: A public hearing at 6:20 p.m. to receive comments and #8. RE: Adopting Resolution consider adopting an ordinance 65 of 1990 authorizing the execu- closing a portion of South Temple tion of an interlocal cooperation between 450 and 500 West and agreement between Salt Lake City vacating a portion between 400 and Corporation and the Division of 450 West pursuant to Petition 400- Archives and Records, the Depart- 759-89 . ment of Administrative Services for the State of Utah, whereby the ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey city accepts monies for the pur- moved and Councilmember Horrocks pose of preserving a historical seconded to continue the hearing document. to July 17, 1990, at 6:15 p.m. , (C 90-291) which motion carried, all members voted aye. #9. RE: Setting a date to hold a nonadvertised hearing on DISCUSSION: There was no July 17, 1990, at 6:20 p.m. to discussion. receive public comment and consid- (P 90-113) er adopting an ordinance closing a 90-204 PROC DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1990 #2. RE: A public hearing at and OSCO. She said the petitioner 6:30 p.m. to receive comments and proposed a building addition of consider adopting an ordinance approximately 12, 700 square feet amending Section 21.76. 120 of the to allow OSCO Drug to expand to Salt Lake City Code relating to the north. Albertsons would then airport zoning and height regula- expand into the existing drug tions. store space, which would double the size of the grocery store. ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey moved and Councilmember Kirk She said the Northwest Commu- seconded to close the public nity Master Plan and update iden- hearing, which motion carried, all tified this area to remain a members voted aye. commercial use, and the Northwest Community Council gave a favorable Councilmember Godfrey moved consensus. She said the Planning and Councilmember Kirk seconded to Commission recommended approval adopt Ordinance 40 of 1990, which with stipulations: 1 ) All store motion carried, all members voted entrances and activities be ori- aye. ented toward 900 West, 2 ) the loading dock proposed on the north DISCUSSION: Janice Jardine, side of the addition be relocated, planning staff, was present to 3 ) design consideration be given answer any questions. The Council to abutting residential proper- had no questions. No one from the ties. audience commented. (0 90-5) She said the Planning Commis- sion also directed the planning #3. RE: A public hearing at staff to prepare a rezoning evalu- 6:40 p.m. to receive comments and ation for the area between Jackson consider adopting an ordinance Avenue and 200 North along 800 rezoning the property located on West. She said there were homes the southeast corner of 200 North in this area and the Planning and 900 West from a Residential Commission wanted to consider "R-2" to a Commercial "C-1" clas- changing the zoning to residen- sification. tial. She said this recommenda- tion was not part of the petition ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey before the Council. moved and Councilmember Kirk seconded to close the public Councilmember Godfrey said if hearing, which motion carried, all Albertsons' business increased members voted aye. significantly it could cause parking problems. Ms. Jardine said Councilmember Godfrey moved there were 178 parking stalls just and Councilmember Hale seconded to for the OSCO site which was more adopt Ordinance 41 of 1990, which than required by ordinance. She motion carried, all members voted said they had determined that the aye. parking would be adequate. DISCUSSION: Janice Jardine, Councilmember Whitehead said planning staff, outlined the area the expansion would only take on a map. She said the existing parking that was currently unused strip commercial center was con- and there was parking available on structed in 1966 by Albertsons and the other side. Ms. Jardine Skaggs, which was now Albertsons 90-205 111 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1990 outlined the available parking on tion and remedy it. the map. B.T. Price said the entire Councilmember Whitehead said block needed to be redeveloped. the community needed this expan- (P 90-139) sion and Albertsons needed to upgrade the store. Councilmember #4. RE: A public hearing at Horrocks said that at one time 6: 50 p.m. to receive comments and Albertsons was considering closing consider adopting an ordinance this store. He said the proposal amending Salt Lake City Ordinance would be in the best interest of 36 of 1989, adopting the budget of the community. Salt Lake City, Utah, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, John Davison, petitioner, 1989, and ending June 30, 1990. thanked the Planning Commission and the planning staff for their ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey support and work. He said the moved and Councilmember Kirk upgrade of the store would provide seconded to close the public expanded, cleaner, and more con- hearing, which motion carried, all temporary shopping facilities for members voted aye. the northwest community. Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Horrocks asked Councilmember Hale seconded to about the time frame for construc- adopt Ordinance 42 of 1990, which tion. Mr. Davison said they had a motion carried, all members voted preliminary site plan, and if aye, except Councilmember Hardman everything worked out construction who voted nay. would begin next year. DISCUSSION: Steve Fawcett, Larry Heap, adjacent property policy and budget division, said owner, said there was a noise this was the sixth budget amend- problem, and a partial alley ment and the Council had been behind his property caused prob- briefed a week ago. He said the lems. He was concerned that the amendment had also been on public expansion would increase the display for a week. The Council problems unless the developer had no questions and no one from provided security and privacy. He the audience addressed this issue. supported rezoning his area to residential. Councilmember Councilmember Hardman said he Whitehead said the residential couldn't support the amendment rezoning issue would be considered because they were taking $440,000 in the future. from Canterbury. He said he thought the Housing Authority had Councilmember Horrocks asked abdicated their responsibility and Mr. Heap if his property abutted shifted it entirely to the city. the alley. Mr. Heap said it did He said the city was taking sur- and that was where the petitioner plus funds from a city-owned proposed putting the loading facility to meet a $500,000 loss docks. Mr. Horrocks asked if on the Housing Authority' s side. anyone used the alley. Mr. Heap He said the whole process was said no one used it and it wasn't riddled with gross incompetence big enough for trucks. and he thought they were only Councilmember Horrocks said they postponing a bad situation. He would have to look at this situa- was concerned that 18 months from 90-206 PROCEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1990 now the properties would still be vacant and not sold. Councilmember Whitehead said this was a problem that needed to be resolved so the residents didn't suffer. Councilmember Godfrey said this was actually a city problem because they had bonded for the money. He said the city' s ability to bond in the future would be hampered if they didn't resolve this problem. Councilmember Hardman reiter- ated his concern that the Housing Authority was not taking any responsibility. (B 89-5) #5. RE: A public hearing at 7:00 p.m. to receive comments and consider the addition of a $1.25 per month fee, assessed either on a per-household or per can basis, to fund the annual neighborhood trash pickup program; and consid- er the implementation of fees relating to animal boarding and euthanasia services when animals are signed over to Salt Lake City Animal Control. ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey moved and Councilmember Kirk seconded to close the public hearing, which motion carried, all members voted aye. DISCUSSION: There was no staff presentation and no one from the audience commented. (0 90-24 & 0 90-29) The meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m. 01-4/(Ai COUNCI CHAIR R ER 90-207 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 315 CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUTH STATE STREET Tuesday, June 5, 1990 6:00 p.m. A. BRIEFING SESSION: 5:00 - 5:55 p.m. , Room 325 City and County Building, 451 South State 1 . Report of the Executive Director. 2. The Council will receive a briefing concerning Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes for FY 1990-91 . B. OPENING CEREMONIES: 1 . Invocation. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Approval of the minutes. 4. The Council will consider a resolution concerning the community efforts of Mr. Grant Fry. 5. The Council will consider a resolution concerning its position on funding the Salt Palace expansion. C. COMMENTS: 1 . Questions to the Mayor from the City Council . 2. Citizen Comments to the Council. D. CONSENT: 1. Board Appointment Consider approving the appointment of Celia (CeCie) Scharman to the Recreation Advisory Board. (I 90-7) Staff recommendation: Approve. 2. Board Appointment Consider approving the appointment of Terri Hartlauer to the Golf Advisory Board. (I 90-5) Staff recommendation: Approve. 3. Board Appointment Consider approving the appointment of Kimball Young to the Recreation Advisory Board . (I 90-7) Staff recommendation: Approve. 4. Board Appointment Consider approving the appointment of Colleen Minson to the Library Board. (I 90-13) Staff recommendation: Approve. 5. Board Appointment Consider approving the appointment of Kenneth Louder to the Urban Forestry Board. (I 90-15) Staff recommendation: Approve. 6. Alley Vacation Public Hearing Set date to hold a non-advertised hearing on July 10, 1990 at 6:30 p.m. to receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance vacating a portion of an alley between Wilson Avenue and Downington Avenue, 125 feet east of 900 East, pursuant to Petition No. 400-793-90. (P 90-184) Staff recommendation: Set date. 7. Interlocal Agreement : Street Sweeping Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation (City) and Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) providing for the City to sweep UDOT streets for one year at UDOT's expense. (C 90-290) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 8. Interlocal Agreement: Division of Archives Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Division of Archives and Records - the Department of Administrative Services for the State of Utah whereby the City accepts monies for the purpose of preserving an historical document. (C 90-291) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 9. Alley Closure Public Hearing Set date to hold a non-advertised hearing on July 17, 1990 at 6:20 p.m. to receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance closing a portion off an alley between Warnock Avenue and Division Lane, 156.35 feet west of 600 East , pursuant to Petition No. 400-798-90. (P 90-185) Staff recommendation: Set date. 10. Ordinance: Conveyance For Value Consider adopting an ordinance amending Subsection A of Title 2, Chapter 56, Section 150 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to conveyance for value. (0 90-26) Staff recommendation: Adopt. E. NEW BUSINESS: 1 . Resolution: FY 1990-91 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the advertisement for sale of $17,500,000 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah; and authorizing the distribution of an Official Statement and Official Notice of Sale for such Notes. (Q 90-5) Staff recommendation: Adopt. F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS G. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 6:20 p.m. Street Closure Petition # 400-759-89 / 400-600 South Temple Receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance closing a portion of South Temple between 450 and 500 West and vacating a portion between 400 and 450 West pursuant to Petition No. 400-759-89. (0 90-18) Staff recommendation: Continue to July 17, 1990 at 6: 15 p.m. per petitioner's request. 2. 6:30 p.m. Airport Zoning and Height Regulations Receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending Section 21 .76. 120 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to airport zoning and height regulations. (P 90-5) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 3. 6:40 p.m. Ordinance: Rezoning Petition #400-786 / American Stores Receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance rezoning the property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West from Residential "R-2" to Commercial "C-1" classification. (P 90-139) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 4. 6:50 p.m. Budget Amendment #6 Receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 35 of 1989 adopting the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 and ending June 30, 1990. (B 89-5) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 5. 7:00 p.m. Public Hearing Re: Fees for Services Receive public comment and consider: a. the addition of a $1 .25 per month fee, assessed either on a per-household or per can basis, to fund the annual neighborhood trash pickup program. (0 90-24) b. the implementation of fees relating to animal boarding and euthanasia services when animals are signed over to Salt Lake City Animal Control. (0 90-29) Staff recommendation: Close hearing. H. ADJOURNMENT. ** FINAL ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AND/OR ORDINANCES ADOPTED CONCERNING ANY ITE1 ON THIS AGENDA. DATED: June 1, 1990 BY: RECORDER STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ss . On the 1st day of June, 1990 I personally delivered a copy of the foregoing notice to the Mayor and City Council and posted copies of the same in conspicuous view, at the following times and locations within the City and County Building, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. At 5:00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office, Room 415; and 2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom, Room 343. CITY RECORDER Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1st day of June, 1990. of y Public residing in the Sta e of Utah My Commission Expires: ..... .Noety pb'Es r........ ''."';. E elisst.#415 ;i ce .; __' 45 l�' Utah s34111corn em15 v,ty trc5 APPROVAL: Lea^ 5,2- EXECUTI DIREC R r L / DLQ U � � (6014 tl,e/) (0 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL rOce_ kkVn "' " !) AGENDA II�� °-) _. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER auk„` 1� ROOM 315 1,Q, 0\0 l� CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUTH STATE STREET Tuesday, June 5, 1990 6:00 p.m. A. BRIEFING SESSION: 5:00 - 5:55 p.m. , Room 325 City and County Building, 451 South State 1 . Report of the Executive Director. 2. The Council will receive a briefing concerning Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes for FY 1990-91 . B. OPENING CEREMONIES: 1 . Invocation. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Approval of the minutes. 4. The Council will consider a resolution con,cer�i�ng the community efforts of Mr. Grant Fry. -Vcj5t ,�, XD �IS1iG�rJ� 6 The Council will consider a resolution concerning its position on funding the Salt Palace expansion. — h�C. COMMENTS: HOO' (, a C50 1 Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.f ,0I Citizen Comments to the Council. - _ 6 _ D. CONSENT: -C/��j\(c i j- / 5k) � � (RACE-- 1. Board Appointmen rdel-- . Consider approving the appointment of Celia Ce i ha-r the Recreation Advisory Board. (I 90-7) Staff recommendation: Approve. 2. Board Appointment Consider approving the appointment of Terri Hartlauer to the Golf Advisory Board. (I 90-5) Staff recommendation: Approve. 3. Board Appointment Consider approving the appointment of Kimball Young to the Recreation Advisory Board. (I 90-7) Staff recommendation: Approve. 4. Board Appointment Consider approving the appointment of Colleen Minson to the Library Board. (I 90-13) Staff recommendation: Approve. 5. Board Appointment Consider approving the appointment of Kenneth Louder to the Urban Forestry Board. (I 90-15) Staff recommendation: Approve. 6. Alley Vacation Public Hearing Set date to hold a non-advertised hearing on July 10, 1990 at 6:30 p.m. to receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance vacating a portion of an alley between Wilson Avenue and Downington Avenue, 125 feet east of 900 East , pursuant to Petition No. 400-793-90. (P 90-184) Staff recommendation: Set date. 7. Interlocal Agreement: Street Sweeping Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation (City) and Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) providing for the City to sweep UDOT streets for one year at UDOT's expense. (C 90-290) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 8. Interlocal Agreement: Division of Archives Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Division of Archives and Records - the Department of Administrative Services for the State of Utah whereby the City accepts monies for the purpose of preserving an historical document. (C 90-291) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 9. Alley Closure Public Hearing Set date to hold a non-advertised hearing on July 17, 1990 at 6:20 p.m. to receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance closing a portion off an alley between Warnock Avenue and Division Lane, 156.35 feet west of 600 East, pursuant to Petition No. 400-798-90. (P 90-185) Staff recommendation: Set date. 10. Ordinance: Conveyance For Value Consider adopting an ordinance amending Subsection A of Title 2, Chapter 56, Section 150 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to conveyance for value. (0 90-26) Staff recommendation: Adopt. E. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: FY 1990-91 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the advertisement for sale of $17,500,000 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah; and authorizing the distribution of an Official Statement and Official Notice of Sale for such Notes. (Q 90-5) Staff recommendation: Adopt. F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS G. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1 6:20 p.m. / Street Closure Petition # 400-759-89 / 400-600 South Temple Receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance closing a portion of South Temple between 450 and 500 West and vacating a portion between 400 and 450 West pursuant to Petition No. 400-759-89. (0 90-18) Staff recommendation: Continue to July 17, 1990 at 6: 15 p.m. per petitioner's request. 40 6:30 p.m. Airport Zoning and Height Regulations Receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending Section 21 .76. 120 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to airport zoning and height regulations. (P 90-5) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 41, 6:40 p.m. Wytkiic.) Ordinance: Rezoning Petition #400-786 / American Stores Receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance rezoning the property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West from Residential "R-2" to Commercial "C-1" classification. (P 90-139) Staff recommendation: Adopt. eij(S(\ 6:50 p.m. (JO(`re Budget Amendment #6 Receive public comment and cons' er adopting an ordinance amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. of 1989 adopting the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 and ending June 30, 1990. (B 89-5) Staff recommendation: Adopt . 5. 7:00 p.m. Public Hearing Re: Fees for Services Receive public comment and consider: a. the addition of a $1 .25 per month fee, assessed either on a per-household or per can basis, to fund the annual neighborhood trash pickup program. (0 90-24) b. the implementation of fees relating to animal boarding and euthanasia services when animals are signed over to Salt Lake City Animal Control. (0 90-29) Staff recommendation: Close hearing. H. ADJOURNMENT. ** FINAL ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AND/OR ORDINANCES ADOPTED CONCERNING ANY ITEM ON THIS AGENDA. DATED: June 1 , 1990 -7,1-1414--#C--21.1,4--, BY: ja RECORDER STATE OF UTAH ) COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ss. On the 1st day of June, 1990 I personally delivered a copy of the foregoing notice to the Mayor and City Council and posted copies of the same in conspicuous view, at the following times and locations within the City and County Building, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. At 5:00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office, Room 415; and 2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom, Room 343. CITY RECORDER Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1st day of June, 1990. of y Public residing in the State of Utah My Commission Expires: .....-1 ....... Pu,blNicEs 1 No 1 .y�F„Z^': • 45 it Stet Utah g4111 1 i r!r_ 5� CjB�t�e m�SSt� IfCS 1 S r� a ambit 1 APPROVAL: 1 0 52 EXECUTI DIREC R 304th MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY June 6, 1990 3:00 p.m. Room 325 City and County Building 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah Special Meeting AGENDA 1. Roll Call . 2. Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting. None 3. Report of the Chief Administrative Officer/Deputy Director . None 4. Unfinished Business . Block 57 Briefing . 5. New Business . None 6. Adjournment . 6/1 Due to a technical problem with preparing the minutes in the Recorder's Office, the minutes were not available to be placed in your packet. The minutes will be available on Monday. If you do not come into the office on Monday, the minutes will be delivered to your home. We apologize for this inconvenience. TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES BRIEFING Please refer to the documents contained in section E-1 for this briefing. GRANT FRY RESOLUTION Whereas, Mr. Grant Fry has been the key player in negotiating solutions to the traffic problems associated with the expansion of the Foothill Village Shopping Center; and Whereas, Mr. Fry has skillfully acted as a mediator between the developer, store owners, City officials, neighbors and the Bonneville Hills Community Council; and Whereas, Mr. Fry has volunteered his own time to go from door to door in the neighborhood to talk to hundreds of citizens to measure their opinion and to work with the City and other interested parties to address the neighborhood's concerns; and Whereas, Mr. Fry's reputation as an honest community leader has lent credibility to and expedited the negotiations between the various parties; and Whereas, Mr. Fry's altruistic efforts have greatly benefited his neighborhood and City. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor that we hereby recognize the extraordinary service Mr. Grant Fry has rendered to Salt Lake City and its citizens. • OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7600 June 1, 1990 MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: ED SNOW RE: MODIFICATIONS IN THE SALT PALACE/HOTEL TAX RESOLUTION WHICH WAS TABLED ON MAY 15 AND RESCHEDULED FOR JUNE 5. In light of the meeting with County, State and Salt Palace officials on May 31, some members have requested that a few modifications be made to the May 15 Salt Palace funding resolution. The new resolution is the same as the old until the 9th Whereas. The next three Whereases and the final resolve paragraph contain the changes. In addition to listing the Hotel industry as the old resolution did, the revised resolution adds "other industries which directly benefit from Salt Palace activities" as sources for the imposition of user fees. The last Whereas stresses that "the City Council is willing to study several options" to fund Salt Palace renovation. In the resolve, the Hotel industry is not singled out, but user fees are suggested for "industries which directly benefit from Salt Palace activities. " I have attached a copy of the "original" May 15 resolution and the current revised resolution which is stamped draft. If you have any suggestions, changes or comments, please contact me as soon as possible before June 5. rEAS, We recognize that the Alit Palace needs to be expanded and modernized to attract convention goers who 4J currently choosing other citinwith larger and more modern convention facilities; and ", The expansion of the Salt Palace is critical to maintain a healthy business climate and tourist trade in Salt Lake City; and HEREAS, Salt Lake City shoulders a heavy burden as the Capitol City, providing services for (I") nearly 150,000 nonresident workers during the workday; and IHEREAS, Salt Lake City is entering an era of increased demand for public safety protection; and +1HEREAS, Salt Lake City's revenues are dwindling due to a decline in resident population, a P reduction in revenues from franchise taxes and recently revised state sales tax law which cost the City $600,000 this year alone; and EEREAS, State law mandates that an ever-increasing portion of the local sales tax revenue is to 1. be distributed throughout the State on the basis of population; and • *1EREAS, Salt Lake City residents actually suffer under the burden of triple taxation as they pay City, County and State taxes to support institutions such as the Salt Palace; and ,3qHFREAS, Increasing property taxes to support the much-needed expansion of the Salt Palace would place another burden on city residents and businesses; and CEREAS, The Hotel industry directly benefits from Salt Palace convention activities; and gHEREAS, The use of user fees to fund services is a practice which is accepted nationwide and we believe that increasing hotel room taxes to fund expansion of convention facilities is the application of a user fee; and i`'- aHEREAS, Many cities in the United States have much higher hotel room taxes than Salt Lake r- -; ° and an increase in the room tax would not affect our ability to attract conventic. and HHEREAS, The City Council will continue to make every effort to work with Salt Lake County and -_=, the State to identify a means of financing the Salt Palace expansion, but now finds it impossible to devote current general fund revenues for the renovation. ` aIOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that we strongly support the expansion of the Salt Palace facilities and will seek to fund that expansion with revenues derived from increasing _-;:' :he City's Hotel room tax.. _ v )ated this 15th day of May 1990 (1P;P Alan G. Hardman, Council Chair tonald J. Whitehead L. Wayne Horrocks dancy K. .Pace Tom Godfrey - y toselyn N. Kirk Don C. Hale -t. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH HEREAS, We recognize that the Salt Palace needs to be expanded and modernized to attract • convention goers who are currently choosing other cities with larger and more modern convention facilities; and HERE, The expansion of the Salt Palace is critical to maintain a healthy business climate and tourist trade in Salt Lake City; and iHEREAS, Salt Lake City shoulders a heavy burden as the Capitol City, providing services for nearly 150,000 nonresident workers during the workday; and IHEREAS, Salt Lake City is entering an era of increased demand for public safety protection; and )HEREAS, Salt Lake City"s revenues are dwindling due to a decline in resident population, a reduction in revenues from franchise taxes and recently revised state sales tax law which cost the City $600,000 this year alone; and IHEREAS, State law mandates that an ever-increasing portion of the local sales tax revenue is to be distributed throughout the State on the basis of population; and JHEREAS, Salt Lake City residents actually suffer under the burden of triple taxation as they pay City, County and State taxes to support institutions such as the Salt Palace; and IHEREAS, Increasing property taxes to support the much-needed expansion of the Salt Palace would place another burden on city residents and businesses; and JHEREAS, The Hotel industry and other industries directly benefit from Salt Palace activities; WHEREAS, The use of user fees to fund services is a practice which is accepted nationwide and we believe that increasing hotel room taxes and/or implementing new user fees to fund expansion of convention facilities is in keeping with the user fee concept; and -IEREAS, The City Council is willing to study several options to increase revenues to fund the renovation, but will not consider raising property taxes or using current General Fund monies to finance the Salt Palace renovation. 04, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that we strongly support the expansion of the alt Palace facilities and will seek to fund that expansion with revenues derived from increasing ser fees on industries which directly benefit from Salt Palace activities. gated this 5th day of June 1990 Alan G. Hardman, Council Chair c0tC:C :onald J. Whitehead L. Wayne Horrocks lancy K. Pace Tom Godfrey lyn N. Kirk Don C. Hale (g_ MIKE ZUHL SALT'LAKE'CITY( GORPORATI.ONi LEE KING INTERIM DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7777 To: Salt Lake City Council May 11, 1990 Re: Petition No. 400-793 submitted by Christopher Curtis - et al Recommendation: That the City Council hold a non-advertised public hearing on July 3, 1990 at 6:40 p.m. to discuss Petition No. 400-793-90 submitted by Christopher Curtis - et al. The petitioners are requesting that the alley located between Wilson Avenue and Downington Avenue approximately 125 feet east of 900 East Street be vacated. Availability of Funds: Not applicable Discussion and Background: All of the abutting property owners have requested that the alley be vacated. The alley is not used for access to any of the abutting properties. The appropriate City Departments have reviewed this request and recommended that the alley be vacated subject that an utility easement be provided to protect the sewer line facility running through the length of the alley. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's Office has prepared the necessary ordinance and is ready for your action. Submitted by: r // • CHAEL B. Z nterim Direct SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Vacating a portion of an alley between Wilson Avenue and Downington Avenue 125 feet east of 900 East pursuant to Petition No. 400-793-90 ) AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF AN ALLEY BETWEEN WILSON AVENUE AND DOWNINGTON AVENUE 125 FEET EAST OF 900 EAST PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-793 90. WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, finds after public hearing that the City' s interest in the public alley described below is not necessary for use by the public as an alley and that vacation of said alley will not be adverse to the general public ' s interest. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That a portion of an alley between Wilson Avenue and Downington Avenue 125 feet east of 900 East, which is the subject of Petition No. 400-793-90 and which is more particularly described below, be, and the same hereby is, VACATED and declared no longer to be needed or available for use as a public alley. Said alley is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point being the northeast corner of Lot 24 of Block 1 of Perkins Second Addition subdivision; .y4 thence east 13 more or less feet to the northwest corner of Lot 23 of Block 1 of said subdivision; )01IP thence south 136 more or less feet to the southwest corner of Lot 23 of Block 1 of said subdivision; thence west 13 more or less feet to the southeast corner of Lot 28 of Block 1 of Perkins Second Addition subdivision; thence north 136 more or less feet to the point of beginning. SECTION 2 . RESERVATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. The above vacation is expressly made SUBJECT TO all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of the property and also SUBJECT TO the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the City' s water and sewer facilities, and all of them. Said vacation is also SUBJECT TO any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3 . EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on . Mayor ' s action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR -2- ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) BILL NO. OF 1990 Published: BRB: rc -3- SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Vacating a portion of an alley between Wilson Avenue and Downington Avenue 125 feet east of 900 East pursuant to Petition No. 400-793-90 ) AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF AN ALLEY BETWEEN WILSON AVENUE AND DOWNINGTON AVENUE 125 FEET EAST OF 900 EAST PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-793 90. WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, finds after public hearing that the City' s interest in the public alley described below is not necessary for use by the public as an alley and that vacation of said alley will not be adverse to the general public' s interest. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That a portion of an alley between Wilson Avenue and Downington Avenue 125 feet east of 900 East\25 o Eas , which is the subject of Petition No. 400-793-90 and which is more particularly described below, be, and the same hereby is, VACATED and declared no longer to be needed or available for use as a public alley. Said alley is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point being the northeast corner of Lot 24 of Block 1 of Perkins Second Addition subdivision; 5"3'f0 thence east 13 more or less feet to the northwest corner of Lot 23 of Block 1 of said subdivision; t"7.�'/� thence south 136 more or less feet to the southwest corner of Lot 23 of Block 1 of said subdivision; ALLEN C. JOHNSON, AICP SALT LAKE'CITY- CORPORAFION PALMER DEPAULIS MAYOR PLANNING DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7757 April 13 , 1990 Mr . Michael Zuh] , Interim Director Community and Economic Development Room 218, City/County Bldg. Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re: Transmittal of Petition 400-793 by Christopher Curtis, et al . Dear Mike: This petition request is to vacate a north-south running alley between Wilson Avenue and Downington Avenue located 125 feet east of 900 East Street. All abutting property owners have signed the petition request . The alleyway is presently hard surfaced. The alley is not used for access to any of the abutting properties. The Engineering, Public Utilities , Transportation, and Finance departments have reviewed the petition request and recommend the following conditions if the alley is vacated: 1 . That an utility easement be provided to protect the sewer line facility running through the length of the alley. 2. That curb and gutter replacement is provided Rflvehicular access is restricted and creates a dead driveway approach. // It is recommended that the alley he vacated with the above conditions. if you have any questions concerning this petition please contact myself or Everett L. Joyce. Sinceree , Allen C[ Johnson, AICP Planning Dector Attachments Attachment for April 13, 1990 transmittal letter to Michael Zuhl for Petition 400-793-90 Legal Description for alleyway vacation Beginning at a point being the northeast corner of Lot 24 of Block 1 of Perkins Second Addition subdivision; thence east 13 + feet to the northwest corner of Lot 23 of Block' l of said subdivision; thence south 136 + feet to the southwest corner of Lot 23 of Block 1 of said subdivision; thence west 13 + feet to the southeast corner of Lot 28 of Block 1 of Perkins Second Addition subdivision; thence north 136 + feet to the point of beginning. Mailing Address of abutting property owners Parcel 001 - Paul & Melba Christie 1785 South 900 East Salt Lake City, UT 84105 Parcel 002 - Wesley C. Anderson 905-911 Downington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 84105 Parcel 003 - Curtis, Christopher N; et al 920 East Wilson Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 84105 23 ' - 1 ri4) CIS• Ct`i'-' 1• I '• 1 ,-='''. 4 "c.i.1 d.1-'' 'I...:.'-•i- "-.. - ) -- ' -- . Isrt41(-• . , ; . - .......--I• , - trl / .. 1J • 05' •I r" ‘ .•,,•_mist... - _ • - .-...:c .4s 5q,6- 373' 3 7-3 -..it:' -am*. -#;:i.: . -• .i,• .-..S4s, 7-5, .... - . - .40....--- . 5 L /NE A , ... Ar..., :. ---, _. .., I- ,t.f,) , . _ , • 35 i ,i,-5, - r. 4" /j11,„4k_ -33t:-..-'9"----". - '',..• fit#C' rr i ,r. i '7'. A 1 - I ::. awifiti„:! • , - / 5 ' 13 446 inE. ..,44., : e-e4 • ,, -!..,e , e ,.. . .4kijk-I 14••-•;4a,Ng. .... ;1 -051.. •-- le 1 c-*" --%._ • 1 4,.., ...4:.... 6._............ I . ' ‘C,1 S. tli.' 'T3 :,11. •11441 l'' , k,, i.-- 341.= ?.• 11 kl 1 ,,. _ ,q• t.,, .._ 1, ;2/_noz___.- i•e4.-_, ci ' ' A.cift- . ,4 -, -' i k..‘• .-;,. --. 7 ...... ,„:. p 1 14-• , (:), I ‘ c.:S. ; -... 't- ..:1• 1..„i- ‘'.., l',:F...z....- , ... . .... .,N.,...0,-- ., ;. ,.: ,.._ r..cft. . . . •1 , I,v. ,....„ •‘. -T- ... ,...,,. ., ,. ., ,,, )._ el 22,-, ,41 .---- ,c..1)". - -.:L ,-::,fxoq , - '••••-.44.4,. .. -1/4440 -,.., ,....*„.1., cal) tiztr ,..,-,P,:: t..-%..: - ..; 3.. . , •ft - -. . , , -i.rii ii---- -; -2 al .., 1-• A - •" 1 , , v.., ,.14..rq. . 4: Itz^.. •••., - 11 :Ps.' • - =1 •', ,..... ..-,..n _ :. . ..,_ ___ „... , , ..--..: ._• treismor • - _..i mai 4111m„A. -''''--1- 1 't. -1. , -"::4-• •Le -, 4-' --- --I 1--A- ..' To-- • 1,...-. . h.. :-,-. , .• , -, V..:., -- 0 1 ir..'0 - -, , 1 ii - U. tf)i . ,:.•,u, me•, V ' ' tw• r•.•460.1., .,„. N. *:: ; tit/ A•,r,..-.41 ',..; . r 7 ' - • • '',441,• _ t-' 14 41, l. .. -.- ' • ' I;''' 9 ). , ' Ilis ak 1„, .1, . ' '' +.4• 104.1 ' 6711g'1 ' , 1 ‘,'...,,,- ATe.! • 1 V S!,'... - • UV 4 i 1 41. 0.1 6 ;.:_ „Al• ._. .. 111 r ." 1 r'• I'xr_.%.,-• 7 .' I _•se "714 *a. 1r ;Z1A I 4 Seritj.110!raaj • " '•*.'•...••:4 L. . 'ON i'''..'1 " - II' . 4" Silf 6)- •diz-i,' , . . , ...IN • ,...ft LSO N '.--,-; - wi ... , , . A ' r•F', . r ,_. ._ -• . ___Iiellt „. • - -. . ,in. _____ - . .50"••'3-1,..,, , ,;.7.4 ,-WT.' . ,.., e---- •-•;'-`ii-i• -:-.":2-4. ' tir--,-.'- .:."7 , ' jr '4'.:.1, 4r. — ....A.. ait'f'-i-:411E. •-'4le -/-74 1-.- 1 . . ,. ,...' -i •-• <3 1, ,..,o, - . — , _, • 4 • ') ‘ s,4 , i'% if , , . ,. t, 0 . , , , ; k,c,,, . • . ,, J. kili Li % -I ,tz.V.,_ 2 : . ., 1.-' - `'13-4. Ate.4"':-- • i:.' • C -'• 17-41 :imit .t. 1,. . 1 i . , i •.. • / —...1, (33 • to, • ... S' • . 2•:•:•--t-z• - -1:,t11 •:‘,6. :_l----471%.. ':fa ,,:-' o: r-...._ , III', . . t-ki':...:..i,-'. . X, 1 '-- '›vv44.. • 0 _ --,y .1. Y ..4 . "", IA • 4,11XX"41 77 9 ."-- I '..L•:....j.:',.,.,-'-,....•:'. ....-1.. .:... 41'41, .1-;•..:IA.... _.,,,,- '. Ti--::i •-ri7.4,- .; a • •• -:. br-• . ,...-• -,..r...? t•', , 1,•' v 4•4 I- • , 1,',.,..'.if.,4 tit:. -,1 2_ ..'''1 i - I. }V = - . A Ac•-.., _ :.•I 01 .2E. ' „. ,.i.ir „ , ,, el !ii..: —.....i.. x. ..•„-... ,or,r•fio 'IV ''''.' e,:41 ...7 5 i . 1,- 7 ' . . , ,• /+- .___ a _-- DWNING iN _ -• --....s7, __............ ..- ,.., -. - , •..-rz444/• . - ___ _ -,2-A ., z '‘'.3r-,...,...-..,-41e--,, 41/4;:,•'.. -..... _ . ...,- --—746+2.24_!-r -69-k .•It i j02.14, • .9.' 7a4 40-74-2,- "N. - .x.x. '• •A , ' - 3 s'i.:;• .. . ..---- - •-,-_. ....— „„.„.... .. _., .1.4. I — .‘.-44.•.•:::s4 ,„ , , F., ..„- ,„ .., . • '>z-''.., ,4 ‘: !:I '.41,0 *..:-.1 .1 - ... -C242/-'...-,.'? V----..t, ' s nib - 1 --- -'f'..77 .....I -0/0 N. . . !Ai ........ :Immo . ..... '' •••• A - ‘"0,:4, '.41C•4:'"":.iv4- I F..51 C..1 ---s's /411 rZ-aleft414,4•4...'. '--• -4, 14.1......:1, Ilief%t i-, ..';';•`:n.V-' ..1.41,4412.; . _.,.. t.-.) • -... 4 "44-4, ,,,,,,,,tt!.!•-••'... i .' -;,• ..,, ,r• -".".° - ••0a...1"-7frVIII/Sei " " .-..---.....--...., ......., . •e•-•.,0 ja:i • t e''-':' 7424 •••!. ...---7 4.7.4.LI , - -.74-1A-1111.4)i ,1.• - •'10 1,,tTi, i‘T..4• - ..4 1 , ',1 if........-;•A .7.4:4'4• ' !--;-1..-.'4'-:,4,-.-4,:\::'-lk:I.L,' '•• ' . ..,-• Aptim.• . ........- - • .... , _47a .1 1 ,...,4 _ . i • 44.) ',..,•-•I . .a:... ''-'-" .• ''' -:24/*!' -- -l•- _ . _ • IV'...;-"' '• • - . _ M '''). ---t--- — ' IA 13-'' ',44• -)3. !, ; -744iir - • - t ten.:' . •-•.:1:0 f----71••4414, L. •s, :-•.,,•' _ ..,.-1,„ ,, ..„- 4. -•._1.,:„.-7-7,71 ... . •-,. 1 le --,'-'..;•••,..: * •, ., • '41 j ....r'....•• t' - '- .' ' 4. ''' 152°4 3 . L -, - -7ZI bagyil i I - •••••/Cr . ,.••_•, . - ., -. .- 1 . gt, s.,. .1 •:--' • , .,,,..f.:--.. 7 -' - -:........--_A,„-°°4—' ---1-: '- 'vi-''' ' ..•1 ''''-'411 • —, -7"-mr""tima— -7 1......44444 • '414'. - f •-• 4i4 i,' ...••••‘ ' ,,, --zei,,,,, .- . I . .. „ 7 1 • JOSEPH R. ANDERSON SAIT LAKE 1cORPORATION., TIMOTHY P. HARPST, P.E. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 333 SOUTH 200 EAST, SUITE 201 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE (801) 535-6630 April 5 , 1990 Everett Joyce Planning & Zoning Room 406 - Building RE: Petition #400-793 , Curtis Petition to Vacate Alleyway Dear Everett : The Division of Transportation ' s site review comments and recommendations are for approval of the proposed alley vacation subject to the following : 1 ) The petitioner provide curb and gutter replacement for driveways if vehicular access is restricted creating a dead driveway. 2) All abutting property owners affected by the vacation have signed an agreement to vacate. 3 ) All utilities and utility easements shall remain as required and approved by the entity concerned. Sincerely, Scott R. Vaterlaus Traffic Engineer I BDW/lh cc : Steve Meyer Barry Walsh File SALTS y .\ (SIT CORPORATION' ALLEN C .IOHNSON. AICP PLANNING AND ZONING PI ANNING DIRE C 1 OH COMMISSION MEMBERS WILLIAM r_ WRIGHT AICP COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RALPH BECKER DEPUTY DIHCCTOR PLANNING DIVISION DAN BETHEL SUPERVISOR LONG RANGE PLANNING Planning and Zoning Commission CINDY CROMER AND UIIPAG DESIGN 1 HOMAS A. ELLISON SANDRA MARLER 451 SOUTH STATE STREET LAVONE LIDDLE-GAMONAL SECRETAP V ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING RICHARD J. HOWA RALPH f'_ NEILSON SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 GEORGE NICOLATUS TELEPHONE 535-7757 JOHN M. SCHUMANN MEMORANDUM TO: Harry Ewing City Engineering J FROM: Everett L. Joyce 1 DATE : April 3, 1990 RE : Petition No. 400-793 Curtis Petition to vacate alleyway Please review the attached petition request for alleyway vacation. The alley is a north-south running alley between Wilson Avenue and Downington Avenue located 125 feet east of 900 East Street . All abutting property owners have signed the petition request. The alleyway is presently hard surfaced. j, ` j LEROY W. HOOTON, JR DIRECTOR A T1 WENDELL E. EVENSEN, P.E. SALT'LAKE'CITY CORPORATION' SUPERINTENDENT .. ..i WATER SUPPLY&WATERWORKS E. TIM DOXEY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES SUPERINTENDENT Water Supply & Waterworks PALMER DEPAULIS WATER RECLAMATION Water Reclamation MAYOR JAMES M. LEWIS, C.P.A. CHIEF FINANCE& 1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE ACCOUNTING OFFICER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 GEORGE JORGENSEN, P.E. CHIEF ENGINEER TO: EVERETT L. JOYCE PLANNING & ZONING FROM: E. T. DOXEY ' �\ /~ WATER RECLAMATION SUPERINTENDENT DATE: APRIL 9, 1990 SUBJECT: PETITION NO. 400-793 CURTIS PETITION TO VACATE ALLEYWAY The Public Utilities Department has reviewed the above noted petition and has found there is a conflict with the sewer ( see sewer plat book 43 and sewer plan attached ) we have found no conflict with the water. If the request is granted the Public Utilities Department facilities will have to be protected. If you have further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to call Mr. Ray Eastman at 483-6787. /kg enclosure cc: File February 14, 1990 The Honorable Mayor Palmer Depolis: In regards to lots 22 & 23 blk 1 Perkins 2nd addition, (920 E. Wilson Ave), there is an alley which runs north and south just west of said property between Wilson and Downington Avenues. The alley was a utility access for coal trucks when that need was there. However, there is no longer a need for this alley. It serves no purpose for parking or access to any adjoining properties, but is more a hazard to playing children, and at night , a darkened crime area for peeping torus, thieves and vandals! We therefore respectfully request the alley be vacated and divided according to the wishes of all adjoining property owners. Signed, Chri t pher N. -urtis m Owner 920 ilson Avenue Carla M. Curtis - Owner 920 Wilson Avenue Wesley C. derson - Owner 905-911 Downington Avenue Paul and Melba Christie's signatures appear on attached letter. cnc ilECEIVFr MAR O 7 1999 ';,- • !- , ; ,{ MAYOR'S OFFICE Mayor D e F' t u.l i There are three e,,:pi Y1-1, =,,:5 ii t, r_'L r-tv :--. 4-:.cont to the alley beNTeen o°5h, in g o ti?,fC ue :and Wilson . =oi 1S. •,r-? e running north and south just east. of 900 East. The o-c,,,Tne r`; of the property wis.1.1 to have the alley i vacated so it may become private property ac:c )riling to procedures normally followed. The alley is rarely ely used as a thoroughfare so closing, it would not be a great inconvenience. i : T;,7:i li, iov,eV, ei , promote safety in our T<.rds. Paul A. and lvi lba Christie own pr o-oerV,7 at 1765 South 900 East., and the alley runs along; their back yard. They hereby acknowledge theirco nsent of the vacation of said alley. r Paul A. Christie C77/_e_eir-r--- Melba Christie Dri JOSEPH R. ANDERSON SALT A` a',, DUANE E. FULLER wo�r _ s �_ r `�~� + SUPERINTENDENT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CRAIG POSSELLI Street Maintenance Division PARVIZ ROKHVA 850 SOUTH 300 WEST GREG RICHARDS ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENTS SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101 TELEPHONE (801) 535-6999 MEMO TO: Palmer DePaulis, Mayor ROM: Craig Posselli, Assistant Street Superintendents DATE: May 2, 1990 SUBJECT: Street Sweeping Agreement Attached is the Street Sweeping Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Dent of Transportation. This agreement provides street sweeping services to Utah State on specified streets at the rate of $39.04 per curb mile. The agreement is for a period from July 1, 1990 to June 30, 1991. CP:ly cc: Joseph R. Anderson Duane Fuller State of Utah UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Samuel J.Taylor Norman H.Bangerter Chairman Governor Wayne S.Winters Eugene H.Findlay,C.P.A. Vice Chairman Executive Director • 2060 South 2400 West R.Lavaun Cox Howard H.Richardson,P.E. Salt Lake City.Utah 84104 Todd G.Weston Assistant Director (801)973-4506 James G.Larkin Gene Sturzenegger,P.E. District Director Elva H.Anderson Secretary April 26, 1990 Mr. Duane Fuller, Superintendent Salt Lake City Streets Department 850 South 300 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Dear Duane: Attached are seven copies of Cooperative Agreement M-90-1 for street sweeping by Salt Lake City as outlined. I would appreciate you having the Mayor sign all copies of this Agreement and returning them to me for completion. You may keep one copy. After obtaining all signatures, a completed copy will be sent to you for your files. This Agreement is for the same amount as last year's agreement and covers the same areas. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. I appreciate the cooperation we have had in the past and look forward to working together in the future. Sincerely, 94fiLd . yy►y _ „ JAA.2).4' Joseph C. McBride, P.E. District Two Maintenance Engineer JCM/rr 000298 cc: J. Boyd Fronk Patti Jensen Gloria Hunt Bonnie Copeland an equal opoortun ty employer M-90-1 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT We, the duly authorized officers of the UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, hereby approve the following work to be done by the SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION for which we agree to pay upon presentation of invoice for said work as follows: (Description of Work) Street sweeping of all areas of Utah Department of Transportation responsibility of highways as shown on attached sheet and within the incorporated limits of Salt Lake City, but excluding sweeping following Utah Department of Transportation resurfacing, seal coating, and major spillage from trucks loosing their loads. The sweeping will be required a minimum of twice, once in early Spring and again in late Fall . Sweeping will be done by Salt Lake City Street Department at the rate of $39.04 per curb mile or island mile. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION assumes all responsibility and/or liability of claims arising from work performed and agrees to furnish and maintain their own equipment and operators. Upon completion SALT LAKE CITY STREET DEPARTMENT will notify the UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION's District Two Maintenance Office for inspection and approval of work. Invoice is to be submitted upon completion of said sweeping, but not later than June 30th of each year. This Agreement is for a period from July 1 , 1990 to June 30, 1991 , at which time it can be renewed if both parties agree. Approximate Total Cost: $8,000.00 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION ` Recommended by: . By: District Director Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED: UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION City Recorder By: Director of Transportation APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: R. Paul Van Dam, Attorney General By: By: Secretary date Title: APPROVED: FINANCE COMMISSION Funds Not Need B y: Funds Available Budget Officer Contract t: 40R - (0 0 �} By: ATTORNEY APPROVAL Director of Finance APPROVED AS O FORM 7 —(/-�6n, ��Q, i-c.. e 1 o of M-90-17 UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STREET CLEAN-UP CURB/GUTTER ISLANDS S.R. NO. NORTH-SOUTH STREETS MILES MILES 186 - 89 300 West - from 400 South to 2100 North Beck Street 7.8 7.8 270 West Temple - 900 South to 400 South 1 .6 0.2 184 - 89 State Street and perimeter at Capitol - 9.8 6.0 500 North to 2100 South 71 700 East - 400 South to 2800 South 7.2 7.2 181 1300 East - 500 South to 3000 South 7.4 2.6 186 Foothill Drive - 500 South & 1300 East to I-80 8.4 7.8 EAST-WEST STREETS 89 - 186 North Temple - State Street to 1700 West 4.0 1 .8 186 400 & 500 South - 300 West to 1300 East 5.0 5.0 269 500 South - I-15 to State Street 1 .0 269 600 South - I-15 to State Street 1 .0 201 2100 South - I-15 to State Street 1 .8 1 .4 268 600 North - 300 West to 800 West 1 .4 1 .4 TOTALS 56.4 41 .2 0260R/2 RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13, Utah Code Ann. , 1953, as amended, allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. It does hereby approve the attached agreement generally described as follows: An agreement for the City to sweep UDOT streets for one year at UDOT expense. 2. Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah, is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER RLM:rc ,�_ CONTRACT ROUTING FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION DATE HUMAN RESOURCES AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/RECORDER MAY 10, 1990 DEPARTMENTAL CONTACT PHONE KATHRYN MARSHALL,il • 535-7671 NAME OF CONTRACTING PARTY REF # DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND RECORDS DFPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, STATE OF UTAH SUBJECT AGREEMENT FOR THE GIFT OF $2,000 FROM THE STATE FOR PRESERVATION OF DOCUMENT Yes No Number of Copies 2 Insurance Required Expected Completion Insurance Attached RECORDER \L\� r- MAY 1990 CITY RECORDER FINANCE Contract No. i97— e 9064 Vendor No. Account No. Funds Available Funds Not NeededL%` /" ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM 4U' r/ MtL. 470p scIa I ♦' 6uyu 7 Qc fior— Date 6-16-O By r✓ COPY DISTRIBUTION Date To RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND THE DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND RECORDS - THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR THE STATE OF UTAH WHEREAS, Title 11 Chapter 13, U.C.A. , 1953 as amended allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1 . That it does hereby approve the attached agreement generally described as follows: An Agreement with the Division of Archives and Records - the Department of Administrative Services for the State of Utah whereby the City accepts monies for the purpose of preserving an historical document entitled " 1890 Liberty Park Master Plan Drawing" . 2 . Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City this day of , 1990 . SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorneys Office Date lei • O CITY RECORDER ByVYd3 FMN:cc KAREN SUZUKI-HASHIMOTO .+'. a.�:l'quiff(w. RP 4_ MN PALMER DEPAULIS DIRECTOR MAYOR FRANK ERASER DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES OEPU rY DIRECTOR AND PATRICIA CAMPBELL. C C_P_ ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COMPENSATION 1.RENEFITS MANAGER 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 BRENDA R. HANCOCK SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TRAINING EMPLOYMENT A COMPLIANCE MANAGER TELEPHONE (801) 535-7900 To: Salt Lake City Council Date: May 9, 1990 From: Karen Suzuki-Hashimot05 RE: An agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Division of Archives and Records - The Department of Administra- tive Services for the State of Utah for the gift of $2, 000 for preservation of an historical document. RECOMMENDATION That the Salt Lake City Council adopt a resolution granting approval for the Mayor to execute an agreement between Salt Lake City and the State of Utah, Division of Archives and Records. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS The total cost for the preservation of the document to include framing will be $2, 225. The additional $225 will be transferred from funds within the Recorders budget. DISCUSSION Under the terms of the agreement the State will give the City $2, 000 towards the costs incurred by the City in preserving the 1890 Liberty Park Master Plan Drawing. The plan is a water color drawn in 1890 depicting a master plan for Liberty Park. This is a new State program and the first time that money has been given to a municipality for this type of project. Hopefully this will be an ongoing program available to the City for the preservation of other historical documents in the future. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 1990, by and between SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and the DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND RECORDS - THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR THE STATE OF UTAH, hereinafter referred to as the "State" . WHEREAS, the State has monies available for use in preserving historical documents , and; WHEREAS, the City has an historical document, on file with the City Recorder' s Office, described as the "1890 Liberty Park Master Plan Drawing" , hereinafter referred to as the "Historical Document" ; and WHEREAS, the State wants to give to the City Two Thousand Dollars ( $2, 000 ) towards the costs incurred by the City in preserving the Historical Document; and WHEREAS, the City wants to accept and use the Two Thousand Dollars ( $2, 000 ) towards the costs incurred by it to preserve the Historical Document. IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants set forth herein, the City and the State agree as follows : 1 . The State hereby gives to the City the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ( $2, 000 ) to be used towards the payment of costs incurred by the City to preserve the Historical Document known as the "1890 Liberty Park Master Plan Drawing" . 2 . The State gives to the City Two Thousand Dollars ( $2, 000 ) on the condition that the City uses the monies exclusively towards the costs of preserving the Historical Document and for no other purpose. 3 . Except as provided in paragraph 2, the State imposes no further conditions on the City as a result of the State giving the City and the City accepting from the State Two Thousand Dollars ( $2 , 000 ) . 4 . This Agreement may be terminated by either party on 10 days written notice. 5 . This Agreement constitutes the full agreement between the parties and any modification or amendment thereto must be in writing signed by both parties . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION By MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Atto�'s Office Date 81, CITY RECORDER DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND RECORDS - DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR THE STATE OF UTAH ea -1 -tea7 1� By / ,461 -2- STATE OF UTAH ) ss . County of Salt Lake) On the day of , 1990, personally appeared before me PALMER DePAULIS and KATHRYN MARSHALL, who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the MAYOR and CITY RECORDER, respectively, of SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC, residing in Salt Lake County, Utah My Commission Expires : STATE OF UTAH ) : ss . County of Salt Lake) On the 2 '''d day of , 7'4,V , 1990, personally appeared before me j .' c 1'oti,...co and who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Are ,41c4ivisT and • of 4/77?H 5T Ttr , and that the foregoing instrument was signed in behalf of said Division by authority of a resolution of its board of directors; and said persons acknowledged to me that said Division executed the same. �y yutbYg"4,i5itC / ,,/��F+ i��7y v ,WfJP3fJN`i' 1 / �e�� Z /L G dqq _ �" s � �1,��i . , _ :e„'' SaltAny ' !ty. `,,,,T`; NOTARY PUBLIC residing/�7 >,,,Z7=- yaruc�r�.,ceomvmr, ;; Salt Lake County, Utah My Commission Expire : FMN:cc -3- \ 'CA MIKE ZUHL SALT' 4 v_ .ITY_= GO_RPORATIO_N' LEE KING --" - - -'"` DEPUTY DIRECTOR INTERIM DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84-ill TELEPHONE 535-7777 TO: Salt Lake City Council May 8, 1990 Re: Petition No. 400-798 submitted by Paul Mecham for the Salt Lake Granite Stake Recommendation: That the City Council hold a non-advertised public hearing on July 3, 1990 at 6:20 p.m. to discuss Petition No. 400-798-90 submitted by Paul Mecham for the Salt Lake Granite Stake. The petitioner is requesting that the alley located between Warnock Avenue and Division Lane approximately 156.35 feet west of 600 East Street be closed. Availability of Funds: Not applicable Discussion and Background: The petitioners owns all the abutting property to the alleyway and will be using the property to build a picnic pavilion. The alley is presently hard surfaced and used for access to parking lots which serve the petitioners property. The appropriate City Departments have reviewed this request and recommended that the alleyway be closed. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's Office has prepared the necessary ordinance and is ready for your action. Submitted/by: ,: irt,411„}/ / ICHAEL B. Z Interim Director SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No . of 1990 (Closing a portion of an alley between Warnock Avenue and Division Lane 156 . 35 feet west of 600 East pursuant to Petition No . 400-798-90 ) AN ORDINANCE CLOSING A PORTION OF AN ALLEY BETWEEN WARNOCK AVENUE AND DIVISION LANE 156 . 35 FEET WEST OF 600 EAST, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-798-90 . WHEREAS , the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, finds after public hearing that the City' s interest in the public alley described below is not necessary for use by the public as an alley and that closure of said alley will not be adverse to the general public ' s interest nor divest the City of title to the property. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah : SECTION 1 . That a portion of an alley between Warnock Avenue and Division Lane 156 . 35 feet west of 600 East and which is more particularly described below, be, and the same hereby is , closed and declared no longer to be needed or available for use as a public alley, with the title remaining with the City until subsequent sale for market value: Said alley is more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a point being the northwest corner of Lot 121 Hansen' s Addition to Forest Dale subdivision; thence west 16 . 5 feet; thence South 0° 11 ' 30" West 215 . 6 feet; IC' thence southeasterly 29 . 5 more or less feet to the southwest corner of Lot 113 Hansen' s 7 << i 1 - Addition to Forest Dale subdivision; thence North 0° 11 ' 30" East 240 more or less feet to the point of beginning. SECTION 2 . RESERVATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS . The above closure is expressly made SUBJECT TO all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of the property and also SUBJECT TO the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the City' s water and sewer facilities, and all of the. Said closure is also SUBJECT TO any existing rights- of-way or easements of private third parties . SECTION 3 . EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990 . CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: 3`. •f•t b CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s Action: Approved Vetoed . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER -2- (SEAL) BILL NO . OF 19 Published: BRB:ap -3- SALT'LAKES CITY CORPO A TIOT ALLEN C. JOHNSON, AICP _,...;ar ;. .,. ,_� PALMER DEPAULIS PLANNING DIRECTOR MAYOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7757 April 25, 1990 Mr. Michael Zuhl, Interim Director Community and Economic Development Room 218, City/County Bldg. Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re: Transmittal of Petition 400-798 by the LDS Church Dear Mike: This petition request is to vacate a north-south running alley between Warnock Avenue and Division Lane located 156. 35 feet west of 600 East Street. The LDS Church owns all abutting property to the alleyway. The alley is presently hard surfaced and used for access to parking lots which serve the church property. The Engineering, Public Utilities, Transportation, Property Management and Planning divisions have reviewed the petition request and recommend that the alley be closed. If you have any questions concerning this petition please contact myself or Everett L. Joyce. Sincerely, Allen 6. John on, AICP Planning Director ACJ: elj Attachment Attachment for April 25, 1990 transmittal letter to Michael Zuhl for Petition No. 400-798 LDS Church Legal Description for alley closure Beginning at a point being the northwest corner of Lot 121 Hansen ' s Addition to Forest Dale subdivision; thence west 16. 5 feet; thence South 0° 11 ' 30" West 215. 6 feet; thence southeasterly 29. 5 more or less feet to the southwest corner of Lot 113 Hansen ' s Addition to Forest Dale subdivision; thence North 0° 11 ' 30" East 240 more or less feet to the point of beginning. SALT' 'CITY- GORPORATION FINANCE DEPARTMENT LINDA HAM ILTON Purchasing and Property Management Division PALMER DEPAU LIS DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET MAYOR ROOM 345 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 PROPERTY (801) 535-7133 April 13, 1990 'I'0: Everett Joyce Planner FROM: Linda Cordova Property Manager REF: PETITION NO. 400-798, LDS CHURCH REQUEST TO VACAI'r ALLEYWAY BE IIAIEEN WARNOCK AVENUE AND DIVISION LANE OFF 600 EAST STREET' It is Property Management's recommendation that the referenced alley be treated as a closure and not a vacation. The petitioner should be required to pay fair market value and pay for an MAI appraisal . LC/mt Joyce.LDS.Vacate LEROY W. HOOTON, JR. DIRECTOR 7K7-yr� WENDELL E. EVENSEN, P.E. SALT'LAKE�G,ITY CORPORATION SUPERINTENDENT WATER SUPPLY S WATERWORKS E. TIM DOXEY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES SUPERINTENDENT Water Supply & Waterworks PALMER DEPAULIS WATER RECLAMATION Water Reclamation MAYOR JAMES M. LEWIS, C.P.A. CHIEF FINANCE 8 1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE ACCOUNTING OFFICER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 GEORGE JORGENSEN, P.E CHIEF ENGINEER TO: EVERETT L. JOYCE PLANNING & ZONING FROM: E. T. DOXEY \, WATER RECLAMATION SUPERINTENDENT DATE: APRIL 9, 1990 SUBJECT: PETITION NO. 400-798 LDS CHURCH PETITION TO VACATE ALLEYWAY The Public Utilities Department has reviewed the above noted petition and has no objections to the Petitioner' s request. There are no water or sewer conflicts. If you have further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to call Mr. Ray Eastman at 483-6787 . /kg FORMS cc: File JOSEPH R. ANDERSON '-'�a"1� v1TI` C�!1`i•O,D , _ �0 TIMOTHY P. HARPST, P.E. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Fi • , CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 333 SOUTH 200 EAST, SUITE 201 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE (801) 535-6630 April 5 , 1990 Everett L. Joyce Planning & Zoning Room 406 - Building RE: Petition #400-798 - LDS Church Petition to Vacate Alleyway Dear Everett : The Division of Transportation ' s site review comments and recommendations are for approval of the proposed alley vacation subject to the following : 1 ) The petitioner provide curb & gutter replacement for driveways if vehicular access is restricted creating a dead driveway. 2) All utilities and utility easements shall remain as required and approved by the entity concerned . Sincerely, Scott R. Vaterlaus Traffic Engineer I BDW/lh cc : Steve Meyer Barry Walsh File SALT' r ,> ;CITY CORPORION PLANNING AND ZONING ALLEN C. JOHNSON. AICP COMMISSION MEMBERS. PLANNINC DiREC JO COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RALPH DECKER WILLIAM T. WRIGHT, AICP PLANNING DIVISION DAN BETHEL DEPUTY JIREGroR CINDY CROMER SUPERVISOR LONG RANGE PLANNING Planning and Zoning Commission THOMAS A. ELLISON AND URBA°;DES GN LAVONE LIDDLE-GAMONAL 451 SOUTH STATE STREET SANDRA MARLER RICHARD J. HOWA s crier;„{r ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING RALPH P. NEILSON SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 GEORGE NICOLATUS TELEPHONE 535-7757 JOHN M. SCHUMANN MEMORANDUM TO: Harry Ewing City Engineering ,1 FROM: Everett L. Joyce b/l/ DATE : April 3, 1990 RE : Petition No. 400-798 LDS Church Petition to vacate alleyway Please review and comment on the attached petition request for alleyway vacation. The alleyway is a north-south running alley between Warnock Avenue and Division Lane located 156 feet west of 600 East Street. The LDS Church owns all abutting properties. The alleyway is presently hard surfaced and serves as ingress/egress to off street parking. The alley is presently marked for one way circulation from north towards the south, which is likely a result of requirements of a previous conditional use approval for a parking lot in a residential zone. , , L,,- --,' ,'‘,' •ip.) • Oil 4,,, , IV--1-4 1, , d a ,....'... , . .1,‘, 4 •,(,\.;( .:,( .i.. ,,L,I .-r-/--1-•=i--- ,. ''-i--/` ki.i'd I: 1: . ''..:' 'N t, / '•'•- , P:' -' 1 F . •tetvW :'1:, ... :*1:. 1 , , i II ' (' - i' A % N.;, ; 4' ,_ ,• , (-\ Nr. . ..• li . * / ' I 11 14 1 ;4.! . '.. • . O' 4 .`•3 % . • -, . • , .'.. ',.. .1 hi . 1 , g. . \ • f 11, I V.' 1 ' I- 1 ' • , !.•. b. ' '17,', ' . I It! . 1• r„ , •, ; .••, ; ` , le .., • %t74, in 13, ..r. :, . . • .., : 1 ' " •,1* l• . .0. .14 ;( ' .141: -‘--1‘... • '' it ..,,,,, , ..., - ....... , St.. • . .10 I - ...,. - 7 . . ':.i.‘.1,-. 7 c .. ,.. . i ,• . ,..., ....,,:, „ ...„ s. , .t.,,: .,• ,, : •:.. ,, i,•. _. ',. I -..-•yt..,:,:'., ‘,,,,f•v!...... : ! - • •.• .,' , ,, 1 ..-!, • • , ,. „,• 1 ...i--. .,..t:•,4,' le. - k,!..!:-, .1 ' ' ., 'e -cc . ., - . 06,4, iI,t,.zl _N.:v eT•c•,t4.i•`1, i1 1(NTf.j-4;v-,;V;.1.,•?.•,..:,4.-,I,..p.i.v'.:.v...';/,,,7..;.4,-'1,..1i4.7g,:d 2.•.:;,;-,..1"i-t.S.,,z.4 4Ir-7t",.. , k9',L./'•i,1Ii.i 4,. ‘ tV, ,•e1:'..,'.7..4I , 0% , 43i rv•, -,4•- 1 1" c • ,•I,,,-ti,.c,t\.,„t5iira.i rl1T,.t.,0-.,l.,- .. .ogA.t".'•.I•lt-1• '..•.. •• .., . Ii4...,:.:...i.., : . lotai : 1:1 • , , k. ,N 'It' ‘, 1" •' ,v i Y •tilf ',•,,,,, , . 4. ')0 . % tkl) \• 44 gigz I, , -,. % CL".11 %'‘\-0,,,tto ...4i .1, , ii. • . ..... . ..... _.N. N.. , . .41,: ....,: , . . • " _N 1,2,..,„ ,.4,,..s..4. 4;4;'.;,..1 ';.!% • 11;c( . ...1 . 4, .-"•• i, , I., 1 1,1 , , . i• • ii'.,)•r- - ; .. , ., • , . t• - , , ' 1 ..-4.-.. -- W..1,,, ;er,-,4; 1••• .," , v "....„1 OW ' • ; , -If . . , ..• le,. , ,. . , v 1 , -I. O . I, •t' , . - , i., 4,,v• : . ,,. ,,, A :.(4..,,,4 ;31,,,,,, •.. . ' ,sof .in i - '•-• .'03. Pt..J'al.; il.'" -' _L T•tc, • • ..' • -* ..-10 1., f- . - _ 1 • ( ... 1 74 • ','.k' ..' • • '- --, •• '• • `ft. ' .: • liptilaummat :e:...., r„.i..„,....;,..1). —,...:,...., pk. r. •• ..„0) k:.I, • , • .. ....1. ...,,,.. • • . , •10.re 161 - -1.;.• 7 - 4 ..t, .,,,,,,,,•; .••• %,,,.. ,7. 4, •,4„ ...,•',1 • 1.. - .-- ''i k .8 .; Al *••••• . •11.tfik, • /•-•.':`,"‘' ."'• ,± - e?C't,„14 i: , di inat - Jr,es • • : + S4.0. i: • 1' ',-'.. .:- ,. .,6..t- • ; t Ni.',1 i." \/ ' .-te • • g. .Ni I •4.=;i1",--4. '' • as•• 4'.--' q " 1. - ', ''' " .'' 4.: - • ,if....e..-A ' . i. k 1-. •-• - ' .%•• ..•%..‘,,,_ -I•;;;;;1, ,„, , ir.. • ,., It51. . 1; ..-.. . 40.1 ,v 4.... 1 : -A• 1-,..I 4 ilsg.a., ,o,...,,',: -••,t. ...P-4.1 1*17. -P. 'k - . ttte.t.:•.;I. •.:r: • o f,..v _II •••:. ,t. 4,•_; .•. ": 0 ',4 •-,,,. r & i, 7' :;',-, -..':• ./..:*. '''.. , -• ,g,, ,. irest,,, .A1 41,_‘;,•i- .4.k.71, ,,,,4 is#4 1 -'' ).‘.,'1.: 10, • ' 1 ' ‘—e't ' . t:!dIDISkTI''' '2‘. ,.3 .: rl ' „i, • .!,e 6 .af 44., .'L kffi'44 •i:4,4-Ity'!'.. • '.? ' ., th3'ri . s .' ,4,..A.e.....,,,, c ..: .e,,rit .,.) • , • -,i, it'.:1,,,.;',..„. ...',' 3 rtr. : i . C. ' .t"; ' . '7. y .ti.9'1-- ,. k.:%;.C;f ,•••'•-1.-• -.‘7. i _.: • ;1' • •.-?4' •' •14',...,,, .,., 1 , ;Y:Niil :i,„;,, *4 , NoN:- gki:.,, .4 ‘y• ,... : • ,r • ' _ • . . . -- 4 , '.,; . 0,0.. 4 . . f •r,e, . . .,. is,t0.- g..41-1.,.;•i , .,,,,. i. ••• •••••: 4-, . , ' , ••, -•,•., ,--. _r-• , , , ..,;,/ 1...:*, f4'0 ,i ,,c,„I ! ' • --•F''- -" '''' ,•,:' . ..tre;atiOPX• '-* " , - •-i-,p , 1 4 "•' i,- /Ariz ,k,7.'•.. le 1 -•, ,,T I 1,___' 1 . . ° l . ,,,I. ',tip.;W1,4,•i, 4,11, . `,171A,'•71:,i;/,,,,..t .A. , ., 1,,„••,,,,?, A.:#:.,1'..Zi.,,..:;.tc, ,,,.,,,,,*-7,.. _ - Ali;Ali,r--;,, 1 .,,,,i, miku. , ri,,,, ...,•,••• •Air,, • , •4-4..,‘,),0i,., ••••• ., • .,,) , 00 , 1 ' 1 14 ti ' •.4'.r.•',-"„ 4• :-. .'. ''.' .41r1p.'1''))••! 1 -s 'g•.347.,pc,-1.• ., .... 16.-- . -1/4t 4 ' Pi k$ I . -I . '4- - ;'. • Si; ' Ilitt. i . tt i‘ L. .. q‘'e• ' ' rr*. ./.1- `f. ... 1 . • 1 ''°' , li .4 1 1 •td,:, ,.4 IV . ..r;! "" ;," , ..,,A ' ,f' --• ; ,1, • 1*- , r df .i „,l' ', . i. , •. .., .,,,...• lir. •, VU...,1 i ., ri t Ef41.1.14P.41 V i ., :VIL '''.... V ,!,I II ', • 7-; ' k,*i.11,'i ag/ te• 1.7 1 i ...44 et,• . ,16 V I I 4: il t:, . ! • ,, , .,.4. .,. , ,...., , ,.. . VV...4' ... • 't' '" . .,,tr•7), f,,,: .-..r.,‘ 1 ' C.1,,.,:,,•,,.t, 71;91-4 i 1t1 1,.1.•,. • kt•.,.. ,.,,b.. ,.. -4 ii,.4.,, i 1.7.: • •• . 1 - , - :-. 1.7,-•••., • ,..., . •• , •••,+,\, - • ap.•_ .. . t, ,, .,,- ,a 1,... • , .,-:;. • t4; pt,.. .,, .. , ,,,„g ft,, 1 . .711 , 'PC• ",- )' i cc . i•tre, •. : A!14 ii;q Z,.1!):4,.',,3'.i.Y;tri . .,....., , : ...‘61,' ‘ ",•, 7.11141$ • f • 1 l' '.t V••,; 4.1.- ‘ 4' -.1.. -41 • ..-- ' i4 ., .--, '.t*.4 ,•'',•' , .• l• ., ••••,' 1;',47 • ,. : i r . . .0,-q.! i 'i:Eigir• -4 FINfr , . ..., 1 ..,...,„ , • 4.:itt ..; , . . A \ , :7,, • ...• orm, , . • - i gsa, N ' , . ,. 11/1.!,', ;t#1:•4‘41i'. INa 4. '., , 1.:1#I• . . . i ‘. 1 :''''; -*).:$1.1.1 :44'. **S* 4 '• 4 j 441 VT•31444*1, ...6,, ....•• C 1.1 . ' h . ; /. j*:' . : . •'. '•f/ N 1 rill' .-,',P.•1''''•4' - 4%,41.4 -,, ri,I,1-, ..4; .• , 4 i, I. 1'.• ,''',, ' i ' 17-r- WPM. ,.,,, 14 0 ''!„ ,' ' ' •tt) ii,:.•:.'_ , , ,,:*..4„4-,,. •,4.,..,. .:- ,*•••• ', ' `.11..0.,, ; tv,...i, 4, Ace , .t . •,.I ' Ai•, lift,' -.; . s; ;4" '•,i;k:',',i;;\-.;71'' -"T 4 Oli i Aff • i , .; • , , ,• , ; /;; l'•, ••'. . 's -•••••' • '11, 4,-,t4,',•"'-',I, 4":". f't,iii-• ,,‘•,?..,..;,. f . i . r ,t4, -. ''.•.;:^1., ,..•. `,,."4'It)`.•4; ..4;iik.n: . '1., :'.fi . ..,r,i 4!;',:.0,71 ., ,-•• •ict : ' .Nik, '", irkair•An.:.••••; 1),• ,' Jr:, ' - -- II ; • 14 , ''''` , • - • : s i.'f.• 'L:.4.i.,. 1,;p7 R'il,,i .t,O,:14.9 '.1.t'f _ •,, a , .• . yc..,,,,, , ,.,ft •• ,,e,...1 , i ,) . , '"N, ft.r). ,;,: .',J•• :' , I d' ,T t '. k 4t, , 'i .' ;/... :roil 0 .1 ,(k,-,',:- Rk : ..;., .,/li/t,..•,..,: • . s.;,./.: i I, )1•• '‘..;+• .i:,,, ..V.,4,1,, i21, , • , ,. fp 1 7 - -oi-",:,, ' !. ; 0 ,t1 di - iii...",„•,,,-.'• . ,2. :1. ;,, rt• r t' .4,•1 •. • 9,'315c,,,,,-ik ilk ; ..- 't,1) . '• : .Se '•('' ....pi •'•!,1',a'.i., 1 ••••••';:, '' i .,(•.$ -,,,,,i t.r11'611! ; -- 41i ..: . . ;:2'' '• , . .i •' • . , . -. '. .e, • e, !$ A., • ,i': ,...rt.:- .4',4. • • re R)-N,7,- 4 f r .,1, .'f '.. r .. ..t.., 4,1,, .. \A, . ( , .-#4, .4•1•s..1 )1, %,-0 • r.,.., i w , .,,, • ,,, . • 5-0,; -, ,% , ,,,-, / ,,F, '• I%„%s, ,,,.. - % • •-- (24 •• , . 1 ', 1,. • t$, . '''to '''4•• i t%; ' ••• ,. ', 1% .kig:..,,I /4.- - , •. '.' .fr,itsi,.', ,,,,,,t,,,., ...: 7.11 , .....14 ,) wil.,t,.., , . 11 , ti- . ,,,,,,, , f .... .4,. •,.!, ..,• .. . "),. ,., : -....i. , ,, , ,..z.4,-;'''',',..:' . .• 11...!: ,,..„ 14 i. pi .___ I '4' , • .;41; ; ,4,-xg,,.. . . Pilliiti,$*": .' (1)f ,e1- - ; 4'1' • • r .,,,...,,,, e;f;.... • ,,- . , . t,4„,i i 1 itot, :.. ..‘ ..,.. .•,s . .• .-f. :',-',), ' ii!- gir -:: ,. . ,10, I 4/I .* . 7 1 •43• - • et! ' ' "V ''''' 'i .[. ,.V..• 4.1 s .• •AA ' ..' ' ' • ' 1. ' r:1.4.), ••''` ,' . lit,. . t, ;':'-'6 ';' --•••'''41' Ari.4:-,J.;;VZH;.; • ''.4e1-- t's.,1''1., ;,i.. :''; ‘,..,/4;#1.,1:,;-. , tijr,,•'• , "it,,v,,,..- ',,, s is 1411L,T. • lit3t4 .,-. k-- 1 i.- '..... . . —kit . - 4)- . .. . . ..,' • .q......., , V' ,, • , 1•.0-4. , _. :*••••s. ' • ' -.%') i'. '•=.• ', #''• - ee, f 5;v •.i '7 '! f// /•''''/ -, q-• I-1 SALT LAKE GRANITE STAKE March 21, 1990 Mayor Palmer DePaulis Salt Lake City City and County Building 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Mayor DePaulis, Thank you for the assistance we have received from LuAnn Fawcett of your staff. She has been very patient and helpful in her counsel. Please vacate the north-south alley between Division Lane and Warnock Avenue, one quarter block west of 600 East. (A map of the area is attached. ) We own the property on both sides of the alley for its full length. We have landscaped the area west of the alley and now want to build a picnic pavilion there. City Zoning will view this as an accessory building but will need a main building on the property to which the pavilion can be accessory. The alley separates the pavilion site from our main building. The city' s vacating the alley will make our property contiguous and will make our proposed pavilion consistent with zoning requirements. We would like very much to have the pavilion completed for our annual Stake Family Outing in June. With permits, bids, construction time and landscaping repair all requiring time, we find ourselves on an extremely tight schedule. Please act as rapidly as you possibly can on our request. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and prompt action. Very sincerely, / Paul F. Mecham, President Salt Lake rani e St ke Cif( r 51 4t7 ^1 cc: Physical Facilities Department le6 eyr�� Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints 4i 6.0 k e • • ROGER F. CUTLER W � ' �` '1 ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS CITY ATTORNEY 1�.7 RAY L. MONTGOMERY LAW DEPARTMENT GREG R. HAWKINS STEVEN W. ALLRED LARRY V. SPENDLOVE DEPUTY Or(ATTORNEY CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING BRUCE R. BAIRD CHERYL D. LUKE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 505 FRANK M. NAKAMURA OTY PROSEOJTOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS TELEPHONE (801) 535-7788 CECELIA M. ESPENOZA GLEN A. COOK FAX (801) J 535-7640 ANICE L. FROST MARSHA ATKIN May 3, 1990 RECEIVE MAY 0 3 1990 Mayor Palmer A. DePaulis MAYOR'S OFFICE 451 South State Street, Room 306 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re: Conveyance for Value Ordinance Dear Mayor: In reviewing a proposed Executive Order concerning donating property to nonprofit charities we noted a conflict with Section " 2.56.150, Salt Lake City Code. We are submitting this amendment to allow donations of City property to nonprofit charities which meet the criteria. The amendment is in proper form for submission to the Council. Christine Richman has the background information necessary for this change. Very truly ours, GREG . HA K NS Assistant City Attorney GRH:rc Enclosures • • • z • • _. • ._1• 7. -• 0.T :\'1-i. t. t, • � • t • (3) The property is used for bona fide public purposes with only incidental benefit to 'the nonprofit entity : :-_ SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon the date of its first publication.-- ,. . Passed Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this • day of , 1990 • • • CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: • CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s Action: Approved. Vetoed. • MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER • (SEAL) • • Bill No. of 1990. Published: • GRH:rc • -2- , ( I) . ,.., , ,,, ;.„,_ ,.: ,. . .. ,_ , ......,i . : , , .. . . . . . . . ,. . , . , . kriallorompTDA am DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE , VERL "BUZZ" HUNT Treasurer - PALMER DEPAULIS TREASURER CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING MAYOR 451 SOUTH STATE STREET. ROOM 228 LINDA HAMILTON SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 (801) 535.7946 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE MEMORANDUM T0: City Council Members cc: Emilie Charles Linda Hamilton Cheryl Cook Buzz Tarsen E.KOM: Buzz Hunt DATE: May 25, 1990 SUBJECT: $17,500,000 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 Background Each year, Salt Lake City issues Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes (referred to as "TRANS," "RANs, " "TANs," "Tax Notes," or simply "Notes") for the purpose of providing short-term financing (12 months) for the City's general fund cash-flow needs. Basically, this borrowing covers the temporary cash-flaw deficits incurred each year from July to November prior to receiving property tax revenues in December. Attached are "Cash-Flow Summary" for next fiscal year (FY'90-'91), "Cash Flaw Summary" for the current year (FY'89-'90) and "Cash Flaw Summary" for last year (FY'88-'89) . These summaries show the monthly revenue receipts and expenditure disbursements for the City's general fund. You will note that with the exception of July and June, expenditures are fairly even fLULU month to month. Revenues, on the other hand, are "lumpy" or uneven, with a dis- proportionate share received in the month of December (over 33% in FY'90-'91) . Because of these differing patterns of receipts versus disbursements, the City experiences a temporary cash-flow deficit which ruches a peak in November. After the City receives its November and December property tax receipts, however, the City returns to a positive cash balance which remains positive throughout the rest of the year. City Council Members - 2 - May 25, 1990 Issuance of Tax Notes are the primary means by which most state and local governments manage their cash-flow needs. They are widely regarded as beneficial and prudent for two basic reasons. First, good financial practice means, among other things, that the City's cash position for all funds remain liquid and available to meet liabilities and obligations when they cane due. General fund liquidity can be more efficiently assured by issuing short-tern notes, as the attached cash-flaw aptly illustrate. The second beneficial reason to issue tax notes is that it significantly increases interest inure to the general fund. In fact, the City is able to make a modest "arbitrage" profit through the issuance of TRANs. Arbitrage, in this sense, is the difference between the interest rate we pay in borrowing money versus the interest rate we make by investing the money we borrowed. This year (FY'89-'90) , for example, we borrowed $17,500,000 at a net interest cost of 5.84%. Currently, we are able to invest those funds at interest rates of 8.40% to 8.50%. Thus, we are earning positive arbitrage in excess of 2.5%. Interest earnings to the general fund attributable to tax notes not only typically exceed all interest costs and cost of issuance, but usually account for as much as 50% of all interest income to the general fund. Upcoming TRAN Issue Internal Revenue Service regulations set limits to the amount of tax notes the City can issue, and thus limit the amount of potential arbitrage profit. The City is comfortably within these limits if our cumulative cash deficit is within 90% of the par amount of notes issued. Therefore, based on our estimated FY'90-'91 Cash Flow Summary, we are sizing the upcoming TRAN issue at $17,500,000, which is the same amount borrowed in the current fiscal year. We are planning to sell the notes at public sale via sealed competitive bidding, with law bidder awarded the sale. The "Notice of Sale" and "Preliminary Official Statement" which sets out relevant facts about the City and the note issue have been mailed to prospective bidders. We are also sending these and the note documents to both Moody's and Standard & Poor's to have the notes rated. Rating the notes results in the lowest .possible interest costs and typically results in sufficient interest savings :to pay the rating agency fees. Basic Legal Procedures/Council Process The $17,500,000 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 are to be issued in anticipation of the collection of taxes to be levied and general fund revenues collected for the City's fiscal year beginning July 1, 1990, and ending June 30, 1991. Tax notes constitute a general obligation liability because the full faith, credit, resources and all taxable property within the City are pledged to the levy of taxes, collection and proper allocation of taxes and other available general fund revenues to the prompt payment of principal of and interest on the notes. Thus, in the note documents to be considered for adoption in the formal Council resolution, the City Council will covenant to levy taxes on taxable property within the City together with other budgeted revenues in FY'90-'91 to pay-back the notes which will fall due June 28, 1991 (the last business day of the fiscal year) . The attached Cash- City Council Members - 3 - May 25, 1990 Flow Summary for FY'90-'91 illustrates this point in the month of June. The beginning cash balance of $18.9 million plus June revenues of $10.1 million are sufficient to pay June expenditures of $25.1 million which includes $17.5 million principl and estimated $1.1 million interest on the notes. Although tax notes are a general obligation liability, they do not require an election nor do they "count" as debt against the City's constitutional general obligation debt limit. This is because notes are short-term and do not transcend beyond one fiscal year. Hence, for the Series 1990 Notes, the date of issue is July 2 (first business day of the new fiscal year) and their maturity date is June 28, 1991 (last business day of the new fiscal year. ) The basic process requiring City Council action consists of two resolutions. Due to the Council's busy Spring schFduile, we have not scheduled the first resolution until June 5, at which time an oral briefing will be given to the Council. The resolution for the June 5 agenda formally approves the "Notice of Sale" for the competitive public sale to be held on June 12, and also authorizes the distribution of the "Official Statement" to prospective bidders. The second and final resolution will appear on the June 12 agenda, and will authorize two things. First, the resolution will authorize the issuance of the notes based upon the terms established at the sale scheduled for 10:00 AM on the morning of June 12. Second, the resolution authorizes the sale to the underwriter who was the successful low bidder at the sale. As mentioned in the foregoing, we are scheduled to brief the Council on June 5 on the note issue and are available to answer questions at any time. BH/kh attachments Name of Issuer: SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION CASH FLOW SUMMARY Draft 5/16/90 Period covered: July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991 (Estimated) July August September October November December January February March April May June Total Balance 3,888,921 9,055,506 4,471,477 6,319,522 2,917,097 1,610,294 24,220,470 21,710,101 19,453,301 23,340,486 21,288,235 18,866,179 3,888,921 Receipts: Property taxes 246,922 374,108 463,702 425,061 3,300,658 19,075,284 405,959 394,699 552,027 1,307,252 573,692 481,973 27,601,337 State aid 0 0 0 72,904 84,936 241,006 227,735 65,648 256,578 225,080 92,191 503,422 1,769,500 Franchise taxes 927,719 874,627 889,925 1,169,616 1,182,329 1,069,323 1,137,127 1,364,552 1,549,600 1,365,965 1,394,216 1,200,801 14,125,800 Licenses and permits 209,006 408,941 190,394 282,011 360,268 286,783 926,677 845,557 316,845 265,787 370,766 308,733 4,771,768 Sales taxes 0 0 5,365,129 0 0 5,629,498 0 0 6,009,389 0 0 5,211,841 22,215,857 Federal aid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest 139,590 163,080 224,910 168,750 160,920 185,490 224,640 206,010 266,760 278,640 223,290 457,920 2,700,000 Parking meter, fines 290,685 316,291 383,791 501,591 297,840 624,235 398,476 939,743 573,336 350,194 429,686 1,009,251 6,115,119 Charges for services 210,261 184,062 541,405 457,452 374,031 1,515,186 470,144 270,760 1,070,646 460,438 417,810 924,049 6,896,244 Note proceeds 17,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,500,000 Total receipts 19,524,183 2,321,109 8,059,256 3,077,385 5,760,982 28,626,805 3,790,758 4,086,969 10,595,181 4,253,356 3,501,651 10,097,990 103,695,625 Disbursements: Salaries and benefits 4,514,417 4,644,071 4,413,176 4,609,659 4,504,857 4,457,889 4,576,165 4,628,020 4,683,987 4,620,653 4,666,051 4,698,521 55,017,466 Services and support 1,801,995 2,250,416 1,661,751 1,843,386 2,432,978 1,544,118 1,696,929 1,702,839 2,015,557 1,676,906 1,252,999 1,673,137 21,553,011 Capital outlay 121,348 10,651 136,284 26,765 129,950 14,622 28,033 12,910 8,452 8,048 4,657 109,840 611,560 Transfers out 7,919,838 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,919,838 Note principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,500,000 17,500,000 Note Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 1,093,750 1,093,750 Total disbursements 14,357,598 6,905,138 6,211,211 6,479,810 7,067,785 6,016,629 6,301,127 6,343,769 6,707,996 6,305,607 5,923,707 25,075,248 103,695,625 Balance 9,055,506 4,471,477 6,319,522 2,917,097 1,610,294 24,220,470 21,710,101 19,453,301 23,340,486 21,288,235 18,866,179 3,888,921 3,888,921 Cumulative Cash (Def.)/Surp. -8,444,494 -13,028,523 -11,180,478 -14,582,903 -15,889,706 6,720,470 4,210,101 1,953,301 5,840,486 3,288,235 1,366,179 0 Maximum Allowable Tans $17,655,229 MACCFD -15,349,632 -19,239,734 -17,660,288 -21,650,688 -21,906,335 419,343 -2,133,668 -4,754,695 -465,121 -2,135,472 -23,709,069 Name of Issuer: SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION CASH FLOW SUMMARY 5/16/90 Period covered: July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990 (Estimated, actuals thru April 30, 1990) July August September October November December January February March April May June Total Balance 2,640,216 10,246,269 6,323,971 6,711,881 3,417,285 1,025,328 20,355,375 18,378,092 18,934,069 21,665,466 23,046,956 20,680,849 2,640,216 Receipts: Property taxes 322,415 280,800 421,329 267,685 2,713,843 16,307,793 315,258 263,019 619,940 2,642,476 845,512 494,688 25,494,758 • State aid 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,740 670,354 208,649 0 76,749 219,099 1,205,591 Franchise taxes 919,793 1,012,984 1,054,444 1,024,180 988,109 889,068 994,632 1,156,143 1,351,628 2,158,637 1,025,212 589,213 13,164,043 Licenses and permits 346,026 254,722 205,002 173,635 294,816 592,089 806,846 756,808 262,817 276,595 353,712 294,077 4,617,145 Sales taxes 0 0 5,456,257 0 0 4,728,058 652,817 0 5,509,291 0 0 5,230,527 21,576,950 Federal aid 10,791 0 0 0 0 0 0 70,379 0 482,151 0 0 563,321 Interest 202,718 166,161 252,660 259,467 223,080 145,559 252,910 238,245 208,038 237,185 216,416 443,561 2,846,000 Parking meter, fines 1,944,141 433,919 348,268 559,619 339,726 474,018 693,547 541,494 452,615 511,693 391,595 451,856 7,142,491 Charges for services 219,221 166,579 199,166 223,699 122,145 1,021,674 161,955 989,730 925,406 350,488 644,634 939,178 5,963,875 Note proceeds 17,500,000 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,500,017 Total receipts 21,465,105 2,315,165 7,937,126 2,508,302 4,681,719 24,158,259 3,908,705 4,686,172 9,538,384 6,659,225 3,553,830 8,662,199 100,074,191 Disbursements: Salaries and benefits 3,878,880 3,950,094 5,605,484 4,264,861 3,870,240 3,606,665 4,106,253 4,318,955 5,102,332 4,032,454 4,136,682 4,732,119 51,605,019 Services and support 1,944,669 2,256,371 1,891,478 1,500,731 3,148,907 1,190,581 1,747,456 -195,322 1,660,352 1,211,098 1,778,684 2,058,626 20,193,631 Capital outlay 72,420 30,998 52,254 37,306 54,529 30,966 32,279 6,562 44,303 34,183 4,571 81,785 482,156 Transfers out 7,963,083 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,963,083 Note principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,500,000 17,500,000 Note interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,081,597 1,081,597 Total disbursements 13,859,052 6,237,463 7,549,216 5,802,898 7,073,676 4,828,212 5,885,988 4,130,195 6,806,987 5,277,735 5,919,937 25,454,127 98,825,486 Balance 10,246,269 6,323,971 6,711,881 3,417,285 1,025,328 20,355,375 18,378,092 18,934,069 21,665,466 23,046,956 20,680,849 3,888,921 3,888,921 Cumulative Cash (Def.)/Surp. -7,253,731 -11,176,029 -10,788,119 -14,082,715 -16,474,672 2,855,375 878,092 1,434,069 4,165,466 5,546,956 3,180,849 3,888,921 Maximum Allowable Tans $18,305,191 MACCFD -13,491,194 -18,725,245 -16,591,017 -21,156,391 -21,302,884 -3,030,613 -3,252,103 -5,372,918 -1,112,269 -372,981 -22,273,278 Name of Issuer: SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION CASH FLOW SUMMARY 9/18/89 Period covered: July 1, 1988 through June 30, 1989 July August September October November , December January February March April May June Total Balance 2,241,634 8,404,517 3,384,893 5,240,881 829,766 197,973 18,595,055 16,640,907 14,274,602 18,436,682 18,199,089 16,967,505 2,241,634 Receipts: Property taxes 159,776 453,729 411,598 417,012 3,038,011 15,491,968 383,539 555,789 408,006 2,135,946 1,216,958 600,085 25,272,417 State aid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 849,451 0 20,904 559,567 1,429,922 Franchise taxes 1,120,046 973,380 1,077,413 1,129,021 1,521,105 1,084,700 1,114,141 1,277,326 1,464,906 1,411,171 1,507,946 1,212,488 14,893,643 Licenses and permits 127,568 344,449 204,583 269,123 297,821 225,793 1,080,862 613,278 239,917 106,145 320,039 277,071 4,106,649 Sales taxes 0 0 4,935,872 0 0 5,301,054 0 0 5,570,858 0 0 4,892,857 20,700,641 Federal aid 0 0 65,860 0 0 350,000 0 203,565 97,840 0 80,630 0 797,895 Interest 265,290 242,676 225,111 179,431 181,298 156,195 248,811 244,005 261,527 306,249 283,115 440,767 3,034,475 Parking meter, fines 405,634 356,438 376,762 450,525 355,645 393,907 372,836 352,504 552,261 367,050 426,544 422,353 4,832,459 Charges for services 120,205 128,645 584,336 607,516 404,510 1,077,456 468,889 104,396 534,519 1,001,568 345,917 794,085 6,172,042 Note proceeds 16,660,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,660,000 Total receipts 18,858,519 2,499,317 7,881,535 3,052,628 5,798,390 24,081,073 3,669,078 3,350,863 9,979,285 5,328,129 4,202,053 9,199,273 97,900,143 Disbursements: Salaries and benefits 3,937,376 5,646,542 3,604,403 4,205,832 3,917,235 3,920,577 3,865,165 4,662,225 3,126,971 4,446,925 3,794,755 4,156,111 49,284,117 Services and support 1,946,928 1,840,137 2,413,482 3,176,800 2,430,476 1,687,972 1,742,440 1,033,530 2,660,824 1,101,392 1,604,864 1,265,626 22,904,471 Capital outlay 10,358 32,262 7,662 81,111 82,472 75,442 15,621 21,413 29,410 17,405 34,018 130,040 537,214 Transfers out 6,800,974 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,800,974 Note principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,000,000 17,000,000 Note interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 974,785 974,785 Total disbursements 12,695,636 7,518,941 6,025,547 7,463,743 6,430,183 5,683,991 5,623,226 5,717,168 5,817,205 5,565,722 5,433,637 23,526,562 97,501,561 Balance 8,404,517 3,384,893 5,240,881 829,766 197,973 18,595,055 16,640,907 14,274,602 18,436,682 18,199,089 16,967,505 2,640,216 2,640,216 Cumulative Cash (Def.)/Surp. -8,255,483 -13,275,107 -11,419,119 -15,830,234 -16,462,027 1,935,055 -19,093 -2,385,398 1,776,682 1,539,089 307,505 2,980,216 Maximum Allowable Tans $18,291,141 MACCFD -15,774,424 -19,300,654 -18,882,862 -22,260,417 -22,146,018 -3,688,171 -5,736,261 -8,202,603 -3,789,040 -3,894,548 -23,219,057 Law Offices of CHAPMAN AND CUTLER a partnership including professional corporations neodore S.Chapman 50 South Main Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84144 2 North Central Avenue 1877-1943 Henry E.Cutler FAX(801)533-9595 (602)256 4r060 izona 85004 1879-1959 Telephone(801)533-0066 100 Peachtree Street,N.W. Atlanta,Georgia 30303 (404)420-1420 May 30, 1990 I11 West Monroe Street Chicago,Illinois 60603 (312)845-3000 VIA MESSENGER Verl F. "Buzz" Hunt City Treasurer Salt Lake City Corporation Room 228 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Re: $17,500,000 Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 Dear Buzz: Enclosed please find a copy of the initial draft of the Resolution authorizing the advertisement for sale of the above-referenced Notes for purposes of distribution of the agenda for the Municipal Council's regular meeting to be held on June 5, 1990. Please do not hesitate to call me at any time should you have any questions concerning the enclosed Resolution or any other matters relating to the advertisement for sale of the Notes. Best personal regards. Sincerely, CHAPMAN AND CUTLER By 1,407 1-7 Darrell R. Lar en DRL:jp Enclosure cc: Linda Hamilton (w/enc.) Roger F. Cutler, Esq. (w/enc.) Kathryn Marshall (w/enc.) Cheryl D. Cook (w/enc.) Bruce D. Williams (w/enc.) Salt Lake City, Utah June 5, 1990 The Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the "Municipal Council") pursuant to due notice met in regular public session on June 5, 1990, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., at its regular meeting place at the Council Chambers, Room 315, City and County Building, 451 South State Street, in Salt Lake City, Utah. The meeting was called to order by the Chair of the Municipal Council with the following members of the Municipal Council being present, constituting a quorum of the Municipal Council: Alan G. Hardman Chair Nancy K. Pace Vice Chair Thomas M. Godfrey Councilmember Don C. Hale Councilmember L. Wayne Horrocks Councilmember Roselyn N. Kirk Councilmember Ronald J. Whitehead Councilmember Absent: There were also present: Palmer A. DePaulis Mayor Kathryn Marshall City Recorder Verl F. Hunt City Treasurer Roger F. Cutler City Attorney After the minutes of the preceding meeting had been read and approved, the City Recorder presented to the Municipal Council an affidavit evidencing the giving of not less than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time and place of the June 5, 1990, meeting of the Municipal Council in compliance with the requirements of Section 52-4-6(2), Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, by (1) posting written notice of the meeting at the principal office of the Municipal Council and (2) providing notice to at least one newspaper of general circulation within the geographic jurisdiction of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, or to a local media correspondent. The affidavit was ordered recorded in-the minutes of the meeting and is as follows: -2- STATE OF UTAH SALT LAKE COUNTY ) I, the undersigned, the duly qualified and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the "City"), do hereby certify, according to the records of the City in my official possession, and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the requirements of Section 52-4-6(2), Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, I gave not less than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time and place of the regular public meeting held by the Municipal Council of the City (the "Municipal Council") on June 5, 1990, by: (a) causing a Notice of Public Meeting to be posted at the principal office of the Municipal Council at the City and County Building, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, on June , 1990, at least twenty-four (24) hours before the convening of the meeting, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, that Notice of Public Meeting having continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection during the regular office hours of the Municipal Council until the convening of the meeting; and (b) causing a copy of the Notice of Public Meeting in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A to be provided on June , 1990, at least twenty-four (24) hours before the convening of the meeting, to The Salt Lake Tribune and the Deseret News, newspapers of general circulation within the geographic jurisdiction of the City, and to each local media correspondent, newspaper, radio station or television station that has requested notification of meetings of the Municipal Council . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature and impressed hereon the official seal of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, this 5th day of June, 1990. Kathryn Marshall [SEAL] City Recorder, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah -3- EXHIBIT A [Attach Notice of Public Meeting] -4- Thereupon, after the conduct of other business not pertinent to the following, the following resolution was introduced by the Chair in written form and, pursuant to motion duly made by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember , the resolution was adopted and approved by the following vote: Aye: Nay: The resolution was thereupon presented to and approved and signed by the Mayor in open meeting, was approved as to form and signed by the City Attorney, was signed by the Chair of the Municipal Council and was attested and recorded by the City Recorder in the official records of the City. The resolution is as follows: RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990 A RESOLUTION of the Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, authorizing the advertisement for sale of $17,500,000 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah; and authorizing the distribution of an Official Statement and Official Notice of Sale for such Notes. WHEREAS a report has been made by the Director of Finance of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the "City"), that it is necessary to raise the sum of Seventeen Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($17,500,000) for the purpose of meeting the current and necessary expenses of the City and for any other purpose for which funds of the City -5- may be legally expended, during the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1990 (the "Fiscal Year"), until the taxes and other revenues for the Fiscal Year are collected, and that such sum can be raised without incurring any indebtedness or liability in excess of ninety percent (90%) of the taxes and other revenues of the City estimated to be received in the Fiscal Year or in excess of 75% of the taxes and other revenues of the City for its fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989, or otherwise exceeding any limit of debt imposed by the Constitution or statutes of the State of Utah; and WHEREAS the Municipal Council of the City desires to authorize the advertisement for sale of $17,500,000 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 of the City to raise such sum for such purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH, as follows: Section 1. Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 (the "Notes") of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the "City"), in the aggregate principal amount of $17,500,000 shall be sold as herein directed. Section 2. Sealed bids shall be received for the purchase of the Notes on Tuesday, June 12, 1990, until 10:00 A.M., M.D.T., by the Director of Finance of the City at her office in the City and County Building, Room 228, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111, and that the bids so received shall be read and considered in regular public session of the Municipal Council of the City (the "Municipal Council") at or shortly after 6:00 P.M., M.D.T., on the same date. Section 3. The Director of Finance of the City shall cause a notice of sale in substantially the following form to be published one time in The Bond Buyer, a financial newspaper published in New York, New York, the publication to be made not less than five (5) days prior to the date of the sale: -6- NOTICE OF SALE Sealed bids for the purchase of $17,500,000 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, will be received up to 10:00 A.M., M.D.T., on Tuesday, June 12, 1990, at the office of the Director of Finance of the City in the City and County Building, Room 228, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111. Copies of the OFFICIAL STATEMENT, the OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE and the OFFICIAL BID FORM and other related information with respect to the Notes, which are being offered subject to the approval as to legality of Chapman and Cutler, may be obtained from the Financial Advisor for the City, Ehrlich Bober & Co., Inc., 60 East South Temple, Suite 1240-47, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111, or from the Director of Finance, Room 228, City and County Building, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111. Dated: May 28, 1990. /s/ Alan G. Hardman Chair, Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah ATTEST: Is/ Kathryn Marshall City Recorder, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah Section 4. The sale shall be held substantially in accordance with the terms set out in the following Official Notice of Sale: -7- OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE $17,500,000 SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH, TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES, SERIES 1990 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received by the Director of Finance of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the "City"), at the place and up to the time specified below: TIME: 10:00 A.M. (Mountain Daylight Time) Tuesday, June 12, 1990 (Bid Opening) PLACE: Room 228, City and County Building 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 MAILED BIDS: Mailed bids should be addressed to: Director of Finance Salt Lake City Corporation Room 228 City and County Building 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 BID OPENING: Bids will be opened immediately after 10:00 A.M. in the office of the Director of Finance, Room 228, City and County Building, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 SALE: At 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the Municipal Council of Salt Lake City will award the sale of the Notes or reject all bids during a regular public meeting in the Municipal Council Chambers, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 for the purchase of $17,500,000 aggregate principal amount of Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 (the "Notes"), more particularly described below. The Notes are to be issued and sold by the City pursuant to the Utah Municipal Bond Act, Chapter 14, Title 11, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the "Act"), and a resolution to be adopted by the Municipal Council of the City (the "Municipal Council") on June 12, 1990 (the "Resolution"). Copies of the Act and the Resolution will be furnished to any interested bidder upon request. -8- Date; Denominations; Interest Payment; Maturity The Notes are to be dated July 2, 1990, are not registrable as to principal and interest, or either, mature on June 28, 1991, and will bear interest payable at maturity. The Notes will be issued in $25,000 denominations or integral multiples thereof as designated by the successful bidder in its bid or within forty-eight (48) hours after the acceptance of the bid by the Municipal Council. Security The Notes will be issued pursuant to applicable law in anticipation of the collection of taxes to be levied and collected for the City's fiscal year beginning July 1, 1990, and ending June 30, 1991 (the "Fiscal Year"). The Municipal Council will covenant to levy taxes in the Fiscal Year on all taxable property within the City, within the limit provided by. law, sufficient with general fund revenues to pay principal of and interest on the Notes as the same fall due and, together with other budgeted revenues to be received during the Fiscal Year, sufficient to pay all budgeted expenses of the City for the Fiscal Year, and will appropriate a sufficient fund for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Notes as the same shall fall due. The full faith, credit, resources and all taxable property within the limits of the City will be pledged to the levy of taxes for the Fiscal Year and for the collection and proper allocation of such taxes and other estimated revenues pertaining to the City's general fund to the prompt payment of principal of and interest on the Notes. Place of Payment Both principal of and interest on the Notes will be payable in lawful money of the United States of America at a bank or trust company to be named by the successful bidder in its bid on the date of sale of the Notes or within forty-eight (48) hours after the acceptance of the bid by the Municipal Council, subject in each instance to approval by the Director of Finance of the City. Paying agent fees and expenses will be paid by the City. Award Award or rejection of bids will be made on the date above stated for receipt of bids. The Notes will be awarded to the responsible bidder offering to pay a purchase price at or above par and accrued interest and specifying a rate of interest that results in the lowest net interest cost to the City, computed on the basis of the note years set forth in the OFFICIAL BID FORM (which is attached to this OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE), from the date of the Notes to maturity, after the deduction of premium, if any. The interest cost shall be computed on a 360-day year (30-day month) basis. If there are two or more equal bids from responsible bidders, and both bids are in accordance with the requirements of this OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE, then the Municipal Council may, in its sole discretion, determine which of the equal bids shall be accepted, or, in its sole discretion, may divide the Notes so issued between or among the equal bidders. No Redemption The Notes will not be subject to call and redemption prior to maturity. -9- Form of Bid Each bidder is required to submit an unconditional bid for all of the Notes on the OFFICIAL BID FORM or an exact copy thereof. Each bid shall be calculated pursuant to the note years set forth in the OFFICIAL BID FORM and shall specify: (a) the lowest rate of interest and the amount of premium, if any, above par at which the bidder will purchase the Notes; or (b) the lowest rate of interest at which the bidder will purchase the Notes at par. Each bid must be enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to the Director of Finance's office with the envelope and bid clearly marked on the outside "Proposal for Purchase of $17,500,000 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990". Each bid must be in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the notice. For information purposes only, the bidders are requested to state in their bids the net effective interest cost and the net effective interest rate represented by the rate of interest specified in each bid. No Good Faith Check • No good faith check will be required to be submitted with any bid. Sale Reservations The Municipal Council reserves the right: (1) to waive any irregularity or informality in any bid; (2) to reject any and all bids for the Notes; and (3) to resell the Notes as provided by law. Manner and Time of Delivery The successful bidder will be given at least seven (7) days advance notice of the proposed date of the delivery of the Notes when that date has been tentatively determined. It is now estimated that the Notes will be delivered on or about July 2, 1990. The City will supply the printed Notes. Delivery of the Notes will be made in New York, New York. The successful bidder must agree to pay for the Notes in federal funds that will be immediately available to the City in Salt Lake City, Utah, on the day of delivery. Any expense incurred in providing immediate funds, whether by transfer of Federal Reserve Bank funds or otherwise, shall be borne by the successful bidder. Tax-Exempt Status In the opinion of Note Counsel, subject to the condition that the City comply with certain covenants made to satisfy pertinent requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, under present law, interest on the Notes is not includible in gross income of the holders thereof for federal income tax purposes, and will not be treated as an item of tax preference in computing the alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations. Interest on the Notes will be taken into account, however, in computing an adjustment used in determining the alternative minimum tax for certain corporations. Failure to comply with certain of such City covenants could cause interest on the Notes to be included in gross income retroactive to the date of issuance of the Notes. Ownership of the Notes may result in other federal tax consequences to certain taxpayers, and Note Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any such collateral consequences arising with respect to the Notes. It is further the opinion of Note Counsel that under existing laws of the State of Utah presently enacted and construed, interest on the Notes is exempt from taxes imposed by the Utah Individual Income Tax Act. -10- Legal Opinion The unqualified approving opinion of Chapman and Cutler covering the legality of the Notes will be furnished to the purchasers. There will also be furnished closing certificates, dated as of the date of delivery of and payment for the Notes, including a statement that there is no litigation pending or, to the knowledge of the signer thereof, threatened affecting the validity of the Notes. Disclosure Certificate The closing papers will include a certificate confirming to the successful bidder that, to the best of the knowledge and belief of the signers thereof, and after reasonable investigation: (a) the OFFICIAL STATEMENT circulated with respect to the Notes (as amended or supplemented as of the time of sale) did not at the time of the sale of the Notes and does not at the time of the delivery of the Notes contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, and (b) there has been no material adverse change in the operations or financial affairs of the City since the time of such sale. Certificate Regarding Issue Price In order to enable the City to comply with certain conditions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the successful bidder will be required to provide a certificate as to the "issue price" of the Notes. Each bidder, by submitting its bid, agrees to complete, execute and deliver such certificate, in form and substance satisfactory to Note Counsel, by the date of delivery of the Notes, if its bid is accepted by the City. It will be the responsibility of the successful bidder to institute such syndicate reporting requirements, to make such investigation or otherwise to ascertain the facts necessary to enable it to make such certification. Delivery of Copies of Final Official Statement The City shall deliver to the successful bidder on such business day as directed in writing by the successful bidder, which is not earlier than the second business day or later than the seventh business day after the award of the Notes as described under the caption "Award" above, copies of the final OFFICIAL STATEMENT in sufficient quantity not to exceed 200 copies, as directed in writing by the successful bidder, to comply with paragraph (b)(4) of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. Additional Information For copies of the OFFICIAL STATEMENT, the OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE, the OFFICIAL BID FORM and other related information with respect to the Notes, contact Ehrlich Bober & Co., Inc., 60 East South Temple, Suite 1240-47, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111, (801) 321-7990, the Financial Advisor to the City. -11- Dated this 28th day of May, 1990. Is/ Alan G. Hardman Chair, Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah ATTEST: /s/ Kathryn Marshall City Recorder, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah -12- Section 5. The Preliminary Official Statement for the Notes, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B, is hereby authorized, and the Municipal Council, acting on behalf of the City, hereby deems the Preliminary Official Statement final within the meaning and for the purposes of paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, subject to completion thereof with the information established at the time of the sale of the Notes. The execution by the Chair of the Municipal Council and attestation by the City Recorder, and the distribution of the Official Statement, in substantially the form attached hereto, are hereby authorized in connection with the sale of the Notes, with such changes, additions and insertions from the Official Statement as shall be approved by the Chair of the Municipal Council, his execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval. Section 6. All resolutions and orders or parts thereof in conflict with the provisions hereof are to the extent of such conflict hereby repealed. Section 7. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 5th day of June, 1990. SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH Man G. Hardman, Chair, Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah [SEAL] ATTEST: Kathryn Marshall, City Recorder, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah -13- APPROVED: By Palmer A. DePaulis Mayor, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah APPROVED AS TO FORM: Roger F. Cutler, City Attorney, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (Other business not pertinent to the above appears in the minutes of the meeting.) Upon the conclusion of all business and upon motion duly made and carried, the meeting was adjourned. Alan G. Hardman, Chair, Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah [SEAL] ATTEST: Kathryn Marshall, City Recorder, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah -14- STATE OF UTAH SALT LAKE COUNTY ) I, Kathryn Marshall, the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of excerpts from the minutes of a public meeting of the Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the "Municipal Council"), held in the Council Chambers, Room 315 of the City and County Building, 451 South State Street, in Salt Lake City, Utah,: on June 5, 1990, including a resolution adopted at the meeting, as recorded in the regular official book of minutes of the proceedings of the Municipal Council kept in my office; that all members were given due, legal and timely notice of the meeting; that the meeting therein shown was in all respects called, held and conducted in accordance with law and in full conformity therewith; and that the persons therein named were present at the meeting as therein shown. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, this 5th day of June, 1990. Kathryn Marshall, City Recorder, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah [SEAL] -15- EXHIBIT B [Attach Preliminary Official Statement] DRL/DBR/jp/859850-nsr -16- MIKE ZUHL SALT'LAP,GITY(CORPO1ILP]lil,r 1J LEE KING w•r=..-res vo..a seas •.-waL "d va, �1(1. INTERIM DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7777 To: Salt Lake City Council April 4, 1990 Re: Petition No. 400-759-89 submitted by the State of Utah and Union Pacific Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on June 5, 1990 at 6:20 p.m. to discuss Petition No. 400-759-89 submitted by the State of Utah and Union Pacific. The petitioners are requesting that Salt Lake City close South Temple between 400 and 600 West Street. Availability of Funds: Not applicable. Discussion and Background: The Planning Commission has reviewed this request and has determined that the historical intent of the street closure is evident by the construction of the Union Pacific Station and tracks upon the street and that the public will receive benefits from the use of the depot as a public building. It is the Planning Commission's recommendation that the portion of the street between 400 and 450 west be vacated and deeded to the State with no monetary exchange and that the portion from 450 to 500 West be closed and sold for fair market value. The Planning Commission recommends that no action be taken on the portion between 500 and 600 west until an agreement can be reached between the adjacent property owners. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's Office has prepared the necessary ordinance and is ready for your action. Submitted by: MI B. Z Interim Directo lf/ r ' + 01/ SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Closing a portion of South Temple between 450 and 500 West and vacating a portion between 400 and 450 West pursuant to Petition No. 400-759-89) AN ORDINANCE CLOSING A PORTION OF SOUTH TEMPLE BETWEEN 450 AND 500 WEST AND VACATING A PORTION BETWEEN 400 AND 450 WEST PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-759-89 . • WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, finds after public hearing that the City' s interest in the public street described below is not necessary for use by the public as • a street and that closure of a portion of said street will not be adverse to the general public' s interest nor divest the City of title to the property without subsequent documents of transfer. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That portions of South Temple between 450 and 500 West and vacating a portion between 400 and 450 West, which are the subject of Petition No. 400-759-89, and which are more particularly described below, be, and the same hereby are, CLOSED OR VACATED and declared no longer to be needed or available for use as a public street, with the title to the closed portion remaining with the 'City until subsequent sale for market value, and title to the vacated portion deeded to the State of Utah at no cost. Said street is more particularly described as follows : VACATION: Beginning at a point located at the Northeast corner of Lot 8 , Block 80, Plat A, Salt Lake City Survey; thence west 330 feet, thence north 132 feet more or less, thence east 330 feet, thence south 132 feet more or less to the point of beginning. CLOSURE: Beginning at a point located at the Northwest corner p of Lot 5 , Block 80 , Plat A, Salt Lake City Survey; thence north 132 feet more or less, thence east 330 feet, thence south 132 feet more or less , thence west 330 feet to the point of beginning. SECTION 2 . RESERVATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS . The above closure and vacation are expressly made SUBJECT TO all existing rights- of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of the property and also SUBJECT TO the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities , including the City' s water and sewer facilities , and all of them. Said closure and vacation are also SUBJECT TO any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties . SECTION 3 . EFFECTIVE DATE . This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990 . CHAIRPERSON -2- • ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER BRB:cc -3- SALT MICE'CITY CORPORATION( ALLEN C. JOHNSON, AICP PLANNING AND ZONING PLANNING DIRECTOR COMMISSION MEMBERS. WILLIAM T. WRIGHT, AICP COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RALPH BECKER DEPUTY DIRECTOR PLANNING DIVISION DAN BETHEL SUPERVISOR LONG RANGE PLANNING Planning and Zoning Commission CINDY CROMER AND URBAN DESIGN THOMAS A. ELLISON SANDRA MARL-ER 451 SOUTH STATE STREET LAVONE LIDDLE-GAMONAL SECRETARY ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING RICHARD J. HOWA RALPH P. NEILSON SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 GEORGE NICOLATUS TELEPHONE 535-7757 JOHN M. SCHUMANN November 6, 1989 Mike Zuhl, Acting Director Community and Economic Development BUILDING Dear Mike: Please find attached Petition 400-759 by Neal Stowe/State of. Utah and Steven Goodsell/Union pacific requesting Salt Lake City close South Temple between 400 and 600 West. At their regular meeting on November 2, 1989 the Salt Lake City Planning Commission reviewed the petition, received public comment from all abutting property owners, and recommended conditional approval of this request to the City Council.. At the conclusion of their deliberations, the Planning Commission determined the following findings of fact: * the historical intent of the street closure is evident by the construction of the Union Pacific Station and tracks upon the street; * the public will receive benefits from the use of the depot as a public building; The Planning Commission recommends the portion of the street between 400 and 450 West be vacated and deeded to the State with no monetary exchange; the portion from 450 to 500 West be closed and sold for fair market value; the portion between 500 and 600 West be held until agreement can be reached between adjacent property owners. Res fully Allen C. Jo nson AICP Planning Digector ACJ:DD • attachments • SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PETITION 400-759-89 BY NEAL STOWE STATE OF UTAH/ DIVISION OF FACILITIES, CONSTRUCTION & MANAGEMENT .AND STEVEN GOODSELL/ UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY OVERVIEW This is a petition by NEAL STOWE/ STATE OF UTAH and SEVEN GOODSE7LL/ UNION PACIFIC requesting Salt Lake City close South Temple between 400 West and 600 West. BACKGROUND This portion of South Temple is abutted by land owned by Union Pacific except . for the portion underneath the Depot which is being deeded to the state. Questions of land ownership have arisen as a result `of this land transaction. ANALYSIS A check of the Salt lake City Engineering Atlas plats indicated that South Temple was closed between 400 West and 500 West on September 28, 1903 and the north half of South Temple between 500 West and 600 West was vacated in 1948. The staff was not able to locate records of the ordinance facilitating that closure, however, there were numerous records of franchise agreements between the City and Oregon Short Line Railroad. County records were not clear as to ownership. The Union Pacific Depot and rail yards have existed on the site since the early 1900's. This request has been reviewed by the "one stop" review committee. Salt Lake City Transportation and Engineering Departments both approve of this request. There have been ongoing discussions between the City and Union Pacific Railroad concerning franchise agreements. REDP4ENDATION The staff recommends the land underneath the Depot and associated land be vacated to the State with no monetary exchange. The staff also recommends the remainder of the petition be held until franchise discussions are completed with the Attorneys office and questions of adjacent land use are resolved. NORTH TEMPLE [ Doug Dansie •/ October 26, 1989 AfA / / //f� SOUTH TEMPLE Si .65 ArdruPP-71. 44,4" .A ,f/t/z ridar ;2000k , ` N J � ST � IST SOUTH a T7 I J J J JI r"TT7•T I ..� T7• V ! J r i 11 r'7'7r'7r7r� • c i- y� • LEGAL DESCRIPTICNS VACATION; Beginning at a point located at the Northeast corner of Lot 8, Block 80, Plat A, Salt Lake City Survey; Thence west 330 feet, thence north 132 feet more or less, thence east 330 feet, thence south 132 feet more or less to the point of beginning. CLOSURE; Beginning at a point located at the Northwest corner of Lot 5, Block 80, Plat A, Salt lake City Survey; Thence north 132 feet more or less, thence east 330 feet, thence south 132 feet more or less, thence west 330 feet to the point of beg wing- • - >r • (11 LINDA HAMILTON ''l � ' � �O ` ��1' + lber,s©•d PALMER DEPAULIS DIRECTOR OF FINANCE MAYOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT Purchasing and Property Management Division 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 345 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 PROPERTY (801) 535-7133 March 26, 1990 TO: Doug Dansie Planning FRCM: Linda Cordova e# Property Manager REF: PETITION NO. 400-759, VACATION AND CLOSURE OF SOUTH TEMPLE BETWEEN 400 & 500 WEST STREETS It is my recommendation that the section of South Temple as addressed in the Ordinance be sold at the fair market value. It is my understanding that the petitioners recently hired Bill Lang and Zane Bergeson, MAI's to do some appraisal work for them. The current land value could be applied toward determining the market value of the street closure. Please have Steven Goodsell from Union Pacific give me a call on 535-6308 to discuss the land value and appraisal. Thank you. LC/mt Dansie.400-500Clo • SALT LAKE CITY PLANING DIVISICN Plan Review Correction Sheet • Log n Project f! _ el74 . 1«-25q , Date Address fig `y>��(J e c'l�D`ft'%' 6(i) /citul Reviewer -D.. Zone Classification Code Section Violation or Plan Correction �l �r� /./t• 1/( :,e/1.//1../r rL L-OZ- /r 1 i -�,i�•-ci l;`:L_ V 1 r-r„'C'.r-' (` G) cl�614;L � � `VC_C Requires plan correction. Requires more detailed information. Additional permits required. • t • r,,'oerHe:- 4 4 - . rr,d : .. .'ti`;e.,°7"4 r'Via: :o: tol : rc: •• .-.!: ` ,r�� Department of Administrative Services Lv.,:," DIVISION OF FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION&MANAGEMENT e Norman H.Bangerter 6.nrrnnr 4110 State Office Building Neal P.Stowe,A.I.A. ,` Salt Lake City,Utah 84114 Director >: (801)538-3018 August 3, 1989 Mr. Craig Peterson, Director • . Community and Economic Development Salt Lake City Corporation Room 218 City and County Building Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Re: PETITION FOR VACATION OF SOUTH TEMPLE BETWEEN 400 WEST AND 600 WEST SOUTH TEMPLE STREET Dear Mr. Peterson: In accordance with the process described to the State of Utah, Division of Facilities Construction and Management (DFCM) from the Salt Lake City Planning and Zoning Office, DFCM and the Union Pacific Railroad Company hereby petition the governing body of Salt Lake City Municipal Corporation to vacate a portion of South Temple Street between 400 West and 600 West. A more detailed description of the area petitioned to be vacated is highlighted and described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. This petition is in accordance with U.C.A. 10-8-8.1 (1986) which provides the standards for such petition. The Union Pacific Railroad Company is the owner of all property abutting the part of South Temple Street subject to the vacation request. Therefore, notice should be waived in accordance with U.C.A. 10-8-8.3 (1986) . The reason for requesting the subject vacation is that the Union Pacific Railroad Company, since the early 1900's, has had a large building and many railroad tracks located on the subject area to be vacated. Salt Lake City has not exercised any public road use of the subject area nor built or maintained any public road improvements in the subject area. The subject area does not provide a public benefit as a public road. Salt Lake City may have responsibilities and liabilities connected with keeping such an area dedicated as part of the public road system that serves no public benefit, especially when such use is highly unlikely even in the distant future. PETITION FOR VACATION August 3, 1989 T° Page Two ; DFCM has an interest in the granting of the subject petition because the Union Pacific Railroad Company has committed to donate the "Railway Passenger Depot Building" and accompanying real property directly relevant to the building to DFCM for purposes that will benefit the citizens of the State of Utah. The eventual renovation of the building will create a State arts facility with additional mixed public uses. Therefore, for the reasons stated hereinabove, the subject petition for vacation should be granted as good cause has been shown, that it is not detrimental to the general interest and actually benefits the general interest, and that such vacation should be made, all in accordance with U.C.A. 10-8-8.1. PETITIONERS: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY By: Dated,: ,' /.;X:/ DIVISIO F IES CONSTRUCTION AND MANAGEMENT By: — 22/ Date : /aaid ¢/ l 0 / ATTACHMENT: EXHIBIT "A", MAP OF AREA PETITIONED TO BE VACATED REMARKS Petition 114.'1 By State of Utah/ Division of Facil 'ties Construction & Management By - Neal Stowe, Director Requesting Salt Lake City to vacate iroggiim a portion of South Temple between- 400 West and 600 West Street, AUG241989 CITY PLANNING & • ZONING COMMISSION' • • • • • • L J I+ +ff i I i " + Date Piled_.Augl1c.t 24, 1989 I ; Addrelr_411Q Stag-Cliff ce—$u-i- in Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 C • • MIKE ZUHL SALT'Ma,CRT 1 ORPORATION( • LEE KING �..\'YY na •d.-�Y,6..I.:i INTERIM OIRECTCR DEPUTY DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ' 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418 - SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7777 TO: Salt Lake City Council March 20, 1990 Re: Zoning Amendment - Airport Chapter - Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on May 8, 1990 at 6:40 p.m. to discuss the Airport's request to amend Section 21.76.080 and 21.76.120 of the Zoning Ordinance relating to airport zoning and height restrictions. Availability of Funds: Not applicable. Background-and Discussion: This: amendment will bring the height limitation slope ratios for two runway approach zones into compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77. This change will allow a steeper approach slope which allows a higher height limit closer to the runway. Basically the modification would be: Section 21.76.080 - "Utility runway visual approach zone" slope ratio from a 40" horizontal to 20' horizontal while the 1' vertical remaining the same. Section 21.76.120 "precision instrument runway approach zone" slope ratio from a 100' horizontal to 50' horizontal while the 1' vertical remains the same. The Planning Commission has reviewed this amendment and recommends approval. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's Office has prepared the necessary ordinance and is ready for your action. Su mitted by: Art'`.- B. Z terim Director lf/ e i +ten SALTIAKE CITY CORPORATION; ALLEN C.JOHNSON.AICP PALMER DEPAULIS PLANNING DIRECTOR MAYOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION . 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 March 16, 1990 TELEPHONE 535-7757 Mike Zuhl , Director Community and Economic Development City and County Building . Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re : Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Airport Chapter Dear Mike : Attached please find copies of an ordinance amending Sec. 21. 76. 080 and 21. 76 . 120 of the Zoning Ordinance relating to airport zoning and height regulations . This amendment to the zoning ordinance will bring the height limitation slope ratios for two runway approach zones into compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77. Simply put, this change will allow a steeper approach slope which allows a higher height limit closer to the runway. Basically, the modification would change : A. Sec. 21. 76. 080 - "utility runway visual approach zone" slope ratio from a 40 ' horizontal to 20 ' horizontal while the 1 ' vertical remains the same . B. Sec. 21. 76. 120 - "precision instrument runway approach zone" slope ratio from a 100 ' horizontal to 50 ' horizontal while the 1' vertical remains the same. The Planning Commission reviewed this ordinance amendment-at their regular meeting , March 15, 1990. The Commission voted to recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed text modification to Sec. 21. 76 . 080 and Sec. 21. 76. 120 of the Zoning Ordinance which deals with airport zoning and height regulations . Sinc -fly, (d) Al tn .C. Johnson,• AICP Planning /Director Imo/ SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT . AIRPORT AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR ZONING TEXT MODIFICATION OVERVIEW and BACKGROUND This is a request from the Salt Lake City rirport Authority to amend Sec. 21. 76. 080 and Sec. 21 . 76. 120 of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance which relate:: to airport zoning and height regulations. ANALYSIS This amendment to the 7unihg eidinance will hring the height limitation slope catior, for runway approach zoner, into compliance with Federal Avi :ition Regulatienr. Part 77. Simply put, this change will allow ,A steepur approach r.lope which allows a higher height limit clo:ler In the runway: Basically, the modification would change: A. Sec. 21 . 76. 000 - "utility runway visual approach zone" slope ratio from a 40 " horizontal to 20 " horizontal while the 1 " vertical remains the same. B. Sec. 21 . 76 . 120 - "prc.cihion inhLrilf:ont runway approach zone" slope ratio from 100 ' hnriYoiltal to 50 horizontal while the 1 ' vertical roFlain RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends th it th- P ! ,Inning Cummiion recommend to the City Council approval of Lho propnr.ed text hudification to Sec. 21. 76. 080 and Sec. 21 . 76. 120 o the Zonin(1 0rdinance which deals with airport zoning and hei .jht requlation . Janice M. Jardin6, March, 1990 EFFECT OF SLOPE RATIO CHANGE HEIGHT LIMITATION • NEW RATIO EXISTING RATIO -•:":••':* DISTANCE FROM RUNWAY LAKE BOARD Elaine B.Weis, Chair PALMER A. DEFAULTS, Mayor • Don A. Curtis E Ackeriind,Jr. • J.Alan BlodgettMackey D z :� !} LOUTS E. MILLER Eddie P. Mayne • Joseph Rosenblatt A Director of Airports ck- Patrick A. Shea • Thomas K.Welch OA• T A ul0 January 29, 1990 . Alan Hardman, Chairperson _ and Salt Lake City Council City and County Building * 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah '84111 Dear Chairperson Hardman and Council Members: Subject: An ordinance amending Section,21.76.080 and 21.. 176. 120 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to airport zoning and height regulations. Fiscal Impact: None• - Discussion: Salt Lake City Code currently defines visual • approach zone slopes in a forty foot horizontal for each one foot vertical ratio. This height limitation slope is not consistent • with Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77, which provides for a twenty to one slope ratio. Although runway visual approaches are currently consistent with FAR 77, the requested ordinance change is to have City Code conform with federal requirements. - Recommendation: It is respectfully requested that the Council approve the Ordinance amending Section 21.76.080, Salt Lake City Code, and thereby authorizing Mayor signature. Respect : lly submitted, • outs E. Miller Fnclosure SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. 1990 (Airport Zoning and Height Regulations) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21.76.120 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO AIRPORT ZONING AND HEIGHT REGULATIONS. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That Section 21.76 . 120 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to airport zoning and .height regulations, be, and the same is hereby amended as follows: • 21 .76.120 Precision instrument -runway approach zone- Height limitation. The height limitation in a precision runway approach zone slopes upward [c:c hundred] fifty feet horizontally for each foot vertically, beginning. at the end of and at the same elevation as the primary surface, and extends to a horizontal distance of ten thousand feet along the .extended runway centerline; and thence slopes upward forty feet horizontally for each foot vertically to an additional distance of forty thousand feet along the extended runway centerline. SECTION 2 . This ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990 . CHAIRPERSON • . N: ••• ' • _ •-. . • :- 7 .. t—:- • -- 7- '.•!. 1... 'y. ,. - ....; . . . . ,. .. .. . . • • .• : i . . , .. *. ,. ._... . . . . - • • . . • •. - ' • .._ - . .-• • •• . .. . - , - •-- '..-. -.. .: . .. -• e• ... s. , . . . - . : CA' ' • • ' ••s . . . • ..... . .. • . . . .'''. • - •^ ' . - 1. . • - ' - -. . • Z.'h• '. ' •- • ' . • ' .s s ' . s •• .. P-.7:—...s. s ••:;. s .• :. . ' ATTEST • . . . • • . - - • . ,-,..........-.., • . - . . . . • • ••- •••• . . • • •. ..• . - . -- - • / • . - • . . . . . . . . • - . -. . .• . • - • •- . . - .. . . - • - " • . " . •- . • . . . CITY. RECORDER • - .. • . . -. .. . • . • . - • • • • - • • • • . . . . . • Tran ,Sraitted to the Mayor on - - ... - • . -• . . .•-• . • - • . .. . . . . - Mayor's Action: - - Approved -. .• Vetoed. • •• . • • - - . . . .. . .. .•. -. - . . . . • . -. . . . • , . . . , • . -•. . • . .• . - • - • . • MAYOR •• • . ..• • . - ATTEST: " • • CITY RECORDER . • • . " . RLM:ap . - - - • . - . . . . . • . . _ • ., . . . • -2- MIKE ZUHL SALT'1J11KLJ GUN GORPO:RATI.€ N� LEE KING zeta, F.I.Y Wlsa>a VL .�•iL•_i�rdp`d' l sa-�,•:pni INTERIM DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT , 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7777 TO: Salt Lake City Council May 8, 1990 Re: Petition No. 400-786-90 submitted by American Stores Properties Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on June 5, 1990 at 6:40 p.m. to discuss Petition No. 400-786-90 submitted by American Stores Properties. The petitioners are requesting that property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West be rezoned from a Residential "R-2" to a Commercial "C-1" zoning classification. Availability of Funds: Not applicable Discussion and Background: The rezoning has been requested to allow Albertsons and Osco to construct an addition on the north side of the existing building approximately 95' x 135' approximately 12,700 square feet. Osco Drug will move into this new addition and Albertsons will expand and renovate the existing grocery and drug store. The remainder of the property will remain in parking and landscaping. The zoning expansion will not change any of the existing land use but will allow the existing businesses to function competitively in the present drug and grocery store market. The Planning Commission has reviewed and approved this Petition with the stipulation that all store entrances and activity shall be oriented toward 900 West Street. The Planning Commission also directed staff to review the final design with respect to loading docks on the north to ensure compliance with city design standards. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's Office has prepared the necessary ordinance and is ready for your action. Submitted by: Aticx-1/1 d/C ICHAEL B. ZUHL nterim Director ray ca. J 404 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE fl No. of 1990 (Rezoning property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West pursuant to Petition No. 400-786-90) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21. 14.020 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING AND FIXING OF BOUNDARIES OF USE DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, in response to the rezoning petition initiated by American Stores Properties, No. 400-786-90, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, has held public hearings before its own body and before the Planning Commission, and has taken into consideration citizen testimony, filing and demographic details of the area and the Master Plan as part of its deliberation. Pursuant to these deliberations, the Council has concluded that the proposed change of zoning for the property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West is appropriate for the development of the community in that area; THEREFORE, The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, hereby adopts the following amendments to the Use District provisions of Title 21. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That the Use District Map, as adopted by Section 21 . 14.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries of Use Districts, be, and the same hereby is AMENDED to read as follows: Sec. 21.14.020. Boundaries of Districts - Use District Map Adopted. That the following-described parcel of real property in r Salt Lake City, Utah, presently zoned Residential "R-2" is hereby rezoned Commercial "C-1" and the Use District Map is amended accordingly: Beginning at a point on the south line of 200 North Street, ( formerly First North Street) , said point 4 / .being the Northwest corner of Block 63, Plat "C" , Salt JIB dv Lake City Survey, and running thence South 165 feet r more or less; thence East 455 feet more or less; thence North 9 feet more or less; thence West 45 feet more or less; thence North 156 feet more or less to the south right of way line of 200 North Street; thence West 410 feet more or less to the point of beginning. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE AND CONDITIONS. This ordinance shall not become effective until recorded and the Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed not to record this Ordinance until the Mayor certifies that the following conditions have been met: 1 . The Petitioner shall submit plans for construction in compliance with the conditions required by the Planning Commission in a form suitable for issuance of a building permit. If the foregoing condition is not completed within one year from the date of passage of this Ordinance, the time may be extended for an additional year by certification from the Mayor. If the condition has not been met by the expiration of one year or any extension, this Ordinance shall be null, void and of no effect and shall not be recorded. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990. CHAIRPERSON �? 6 CIP : 41? ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on - Mayor ' s Action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER BRB:rc i cY t,.A -3- . + ALLEN C. JOHNSON• AICP SA LP r 1\ l ✓ cP S 'i"'�O�D?� �10s. PALMER DEPAULIS .rvr.z-:vim r�s •.. tea.as —a v'sraxss vi�mm.b PLANNING DIRECTOR MAYOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7757 May 7, 1990 Mike Zhul, Interim Director Community and Economic Development City and County Building Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re: Petition 400-786 - Rezoning Osco Drug/Albertsons, 900 West & North Temple Dear Mike: Attached please find Petition 400-786 from American Stores Properties requesting Salt Lake City to rezone property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West from Residential R-2 to Commercial C-1 zoning classification. This property is a portion of the parking lot for the shopping center located on the block. It is the intention of Albertsons and Osco to construct an addition on the north side of the existing building approximately 95 ' x 135 ' , approximately 12, 700 sq. ft. Osco Drug will move into this new addition and Albertsons will expand and renovate the existing grocery store and drug store. The remainder of the property will remain in parking and landscaping. At their regular meeting, May 3, 1990, the Planning Commission reviewed this petition and voted to recommend to the City Council the expansion of the zoning on this property from Residential R-2 to Commercial C-1, with the stipulation that all store entrances and activity shall be oriented toward 900 West Street. The Planning Commission also directed staff to review the final design with respect to loading docks on the north to ensure compliance with City design standards. Expansion of the zoning will not change any of the existing land use but will allow the existing business to function competitively in the present drug and grocery store market. f Page 2 ; Mike Zhul I May 7, 1990 Re: Petition 400-786 - Rezoning Osco Drug/Albertsons, 900 West & f��(],,� North Temple • 4T`7 A copy of the planning staff report and supporting documentation is attached for your reference. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Janice Jardine or myself. Sincere Allen/C. J hnson, AICP Planning rector attachments ACJ: JJ cc: Ms. Lavone Liddle-Gamonal, Planning Commission Chairwoman Mr. John Davidson, American Stores Properties, Petitioner SALT LAK( TTY PLANNING COMMISSION S ' F REPORT AMERICAN STORES i .JPERTIES REQUESTING TO RED iE THE SOUTHEAST • CORNER OF 200 NORTH AND 900 WEST FROM RESIDENTIAL R-2 TO COMMERCIAL C-1 OVERVIEW Mr . John Davidson representative for American Stores Properties, Inc. owners of Osco Drug Stores is requesting Salt Lake City to rezone property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West from Residential R-2 to Commercial C-1. The proposed use is a building addition of approximately 12, 700 sq. ft. for Osco Drug. Albertsons will expand into the existing drug store space which will double the size of the grocery store. BACKGROUND In 1958 a conditional use was approved by the Board of Adjustment for a parking lot in a Residential R-6 zone to be used in conjunction with a proposed market. Owner of the property at that time was Grand Central. The existing strip commercial center was constructed in 1966 by Albertsons and Skaggs. Surrounding land uses are residential across 900 West and 200 North; residential and commercial to the east; and commercial to the south. The southern 3/4 of the block is zoned Commercial C-1, and the northern 1/4 which includes this property is zoned Residential R-2. The only portion of the block in residential use is the northeast corner . ANALYSIS With the expansion of the zoning as requested the existing shopping center will be expanded and refurbished. The current use of the property to be rezoned is primarily associated with the commercial uses providing parking for customers and employees. The proposed addition and existing structure will require 181 parking stalls. The site plan submitted with the application shows 178 parking stalls just for the Osco area and does not count the parking which will be removed by the proposed addition. Existing parking for Albertsons is not shown on this site plan, however, it appears that there is adequate existing parking for the proposed expansion and existing commercial uses . There is one curb cut on 200 North which provides access into the parking lot for the shopping center. Any openings such as store entrances should be oriented toward the west in order to mitigate any impacts on the residential uses across 200 North. North Temple and 900 West Streets are arterial streets and should have adequate capacity to handle any additional traffic. The Northwest Community Master Plan and Update both identify this area to remain in commercial use. • Staff attended t March 7, 1990 Northwest C• ! unity Council meeting and pro ' •."d information concernin. rf, requested expansion of th ommercial C-1 zoning. T proposal received a • favorable consensus from the Community Council. RECOMMENDATION ,mow Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the expansion of the zoning on this property from Residential R-2 to Commercial C-1, with the stipulation that all store entrances and activity shall be oriented toward 900 West Street. Expansion of the zoning will not change any of the existing land use but will allow the existing business to function competitively in the present drug and grocery store market. April 25, 1990 Janice M. Jardine 200 NORTH _::.ii7.�: —;T� .. -` x .r..i-•ir. i:rSik3[ -�.,'�t 1 a . "`i a �..-1, ' ' =U L U U r I i LJIJF 1 3 f ` T'i •00 ^ORTN ST w �3 a ; Za II r 1} i, .-.- . .:,,:,3 ,i.1‘'.'/. •‘; • '. .. . :`.:c-C--;.i43,:.-:,?-,4— U.,. •T,'':' 1.0. . ; c!„. 2 : . q •::::: N w"r.`)—��.�!"' -2`w + "6, '� _:G is 1: 1.'' so ; z1w 300 ROIITN 9T } AOSeu N'.Ma _ . . . - sm. I. . 3 .— _i j _.1 • ' w \:•�. F.IR 200 xOR Tr ..< (� .--' -. ;1 ; i 4'1 -. \\. .i 1 - 01 1 ..". 14' i ''... --9 VA4 SN: Aiiiii I ':.-1. Walgeohm :N. - ii,, mom i livek 0 1' ; a -ill Er NORTH 'LE / 'i F a L' m4s.,� -6 _ __a-OJACRSON AVE(Pw.rw[Z wuaTl— '2 A / _• 2•2 3 ir. ,� fI 4 `F — — = �/ g_' r- 4 /A/f7r; 7 116r ryas //C/ . lilt -n' o '6�ui t' 2 A 2 w N• ST , i 1.., r.! i i -2.r.-•AlKih, r. .-1.:.70 p /'/i • C >'i Zf ' i a0a� ' IS G co G [�; fi / % �/ 'T C i — 1R4 SGYTN A 11 - '- - 1f it A. Ei 1[ qq' 1- .Z Y Ir i6 •a as i t i .. i .__ NORTH TEMPLE APPLICATION FOR ZONING AMENDEMENT • To be filed in duplicate with the department of Development Services 324 South State Street Suite #201 • Filing Fee $100.00 Advertising Fee* $100.00 (*if a public hearing is held) Application is hereby made to the Mayor and City Council of Salt Lake City Utah, to: Amerx1 the text of the Zoning Ordinance. By amending Section N/A (Use reverse side for requested text change) Amend the Use District (Zoning) Map. Of Salt Lake City by reclassifying the folloding property located at: A .3587 acre parcel Iodated at the southeast corner of 200 North Street and 900 West Street in Salt Lake City, Utah from a R-2 classification to a C-1 classification (Use reverse side for legal description) ATTACH TO APPLICATION 1. The reasons why the present zoning is not proper for the area. 2. Changes which have taken place in the area which justify a change in zoning. 3. Description of the proposed use to be made of the property. 4. Other items which justify a change in the existing zoning. 5. Indication of support for rezoning from all affected property owners. 6. Any other information or exhibits which would aid the planning Commission in arriving at a proper recommendation. 7. Sidwell Parcel Identification Number. THE ABOVE INFORMATICN, IN DETAIL, MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION IN ORDER FOR THE PL'TITICo7 TO BE PROPERLY CONSIDERED BY THE PLNNNING COMMISSION. AMERICAN STARES PROPERTIES, INC. ( C, Signature of the applicant BY:w- l i'<<�t:�it' )SCIA. Address 5201 Amelia Earhart Dr. Salt Lake City, {Jtah TelephonS Number 801-539-0112 zip Code 84116 FILL CUT REVERSE SIDE Attach all exhibits and supporting data to application. Petition No. • , Date Receipt No. (_(,- ,j G Amount $ • c! �, c • • Sidwell Parcel Identification Number. # 08 3 5 4 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Legal description of property covered in the application: Beginning at a point on the South line of 200 North Street, said point being the Northwest corner of Block 63, Plat "C", Salt Lake City Survey; and running thence South 89° 53' 18" East 125.00 feet; thence South 0° 25' 05" West 125.00 feet; thence North 89° 53' 18" West 125.00 feet to the East line of Eighth West Street, thence North 0° 25' 05" East 125.00 feet to the point of beginning. Desired Zoning Text Change: N/A Naves and nailing addresses of all abutting and/or affected property owner: 1. - address 2. address 3. address 4. address 5. address 6. • address 7. address 8. address 9. address 10. address 11. address 12. address 13. address 14. address 15. address Use additional sheet of paper for more names and addresses. ATTACH ALL INFORMATION 'Do a AS OUTLINED ON THE FRONT OF THIS FORM. SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 324 SOUTH STATE STREET Suite #200 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 Ph: 535-7757 1 ) The reasons why the present zoning is not proper for the area. a) Currently the property is surfaced with asphaltic pavement and is part of an active retail strip shopping center. The property is presently utilized by the existing businesses within the shopping center for customer and employee parking as well as an access way for merchandise deliveries to such businesses. 2) Changes which have taken place in the area which justify a change in zoning. a) There have been no significant changes within the shopping center. However, the application for the change in zoning is made with the anticipation of potential shopping center expansion/refurbishment. 3) Description of the proposed use to be made of the property. a) Provided the change in zoning is granted, an expansion of the shopping center is contemplated via the construction of an additional building adjacent the north wall of the existing structures . The remainder of the property in question would continue to be utilized for parking and landscaping. 4) Other items which justify a change in the existing zoning. a) The current use of the property is primarily associated with a commercial usage. Additionally, due to the property's configuration and location, there appears little likelihood of a future residential use for the same. 5) Indication of support for rezoning from all affected property owners. 6) Any other information or exhibits which would aid the Planning Commission in arriving at a proper recommendation. a) See attached survey. 7) Sidwell Parcel Identification Number. a) 08-35-454- 001-0000 0224W:12/06/89 • ,:4. AMERICAN STORES PROPERTIES,INC. 1818 SWIFT DRIVE January 9, 1990 OAK BROOK,ILLINOIS 60521 (708)572-5000 FAX(708)571-6143 VIA AIRBORNE Salt Lake City Planning Division 451 South State, Room 406 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Attention: Janice M. Jardine, Community Planner Re: Rezone Application Parcels #08-35-454-001-0000 and #08-35-454-002-0000 SEC 900 West and 200 North Streets Salt Lake City, Utah Dear Janice: Per our meeting in late November, 1989, you know of American Stores Properties ' desire to change the zoning classification of the above two (2) parcels from R-2 to C-1 . The reclassification is sought as part of a proposed northern expansion of the current shopping center buildings, but the change is sought without the enlargement as a contingency. Enclosed are the following items: 1 ) The completed originals of an Application for Zoning Amendment for each parcel . 2) An attachment which addresses the seven (7) points set forth on the front page of each Application. 3) An updated survey of the two (2) parcels complete with existing building locations, utility placements, boundary locations and dimensions, present zoning division, and a revised legal description. 4) A site plan which illustrates the proposed building expansion, if completed, with the anticipated parking and delivery layout. A question. . . .as the street designations nearest the parcel have changed since the legal descriptions were placed of record, will replacement descriptions need to be utilized or filed? We have those available. Corporate Offices 5201 AMELIA EARHART DRIVE/SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84116 PO BOX 27447/SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84127-0447 TELEPHONE(801)539-0112 (800)541-2863/FAX(801)537-7808 A Subsidiary of American Stores Company Salt Lake City Planning Division January 9, 1990 Page 2 Hopefully, sufficient material has been included to formally begin the rezone application procedure. With this in mind, please review these enclosures and advise me as to what other information is required. Further, please begin the municipal review process for us by scheduling this issue at the earliest hearing. You mentioned during our meeting that one (1 ) or more neighborhood organizations would need to be addressed. I am prepared 'to meet with you and them when appropriate. I shall call you on Friday, January 12, 1990 to discuss the above. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, AMERICAN STORES PROPERTIES, INC. John Davison Real Estate Director JO: lc/0248W Attachments l (10 P rD r r��-. JOSEPH R.ANDERSON w,.;trir A‘- 4R GIly C,RP ��hATION TIMOTHY P. HARPST, P.E. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CfTY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 333 SOUTH 200 EAST, SUITE 201 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE (801) 535-6630 February 15, 1990 Janice Jardine Planning & Zoning 4th Floor - City Hall RE: Petition #400-786 American Stores Properties Dear Janice: The Division of Transportation' s site review comments and recommendations for the property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West are: 1) The curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements along the public frontage are existing as well as improvements for vehicular use on the private development. 2) There seems to be no change in basic use to abutting property owners and the existing development can absorb the additional impact generated by the expansion within the development, 900 West is a minor arterial and can absorb additional traffic generated by the development. 3 ) All utilities and utility easements shall remain as required and approved by the entity concerned. 4) All service areas shall conform to on-site staging requirements and be screened to ease any residential impact. Sincerely, Ao.,60e /L4t76:1--- Scott R. Vaterlaus Traffic Engineer I BDW/lh cc: Steve Meyer Barry Walsh File .1;1 • LINDA giAMILTON M. ' A)41;Off ONOZ M PALMER DEPAULIS DIRECTOR OF FINANCE MAYOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT - Policy and Budget Division 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 248 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE (801) 535-7810 May 3, 1990 TO: Salt Lake City Council RE: BUDGET AMENDMENT #6 - PUBLIC HEARING Recommendation: That on May 15, 1990 the City Council set a date to hold a public hearing on June 5, 1990 to discuss Budget Amendment #6. Availability of Funds: Not applicable. Discussion and Background: Due to scheduling difficulties, it is necessary to set the date for the hearing much earlier than usual. Therefore, all work necessary for the amendment packets has not been finalized. The Council Executive Director has indicated, however, that it would be acceptable to transmit the amendment packets to the Council office on May 24, 1990, one week prior to the scheduled public hearing date. Additionally, a briefing session will be held with the Council on May 29 to discuss the amendment. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's office has prepared the necessary ordinance and it is included with this transmittal. Submitted by: Linda Hamilton Director of Finance LH/SF:lc Enclosure t k SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. OF 1990 (Amending the Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 36 OF 1989 ADOPTING THE BUDGET OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1989 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1990 . PREAMBLE On June 13, 1989 , the Salt Lake City Council (the "City Council" ) adopted the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 and ending June 30, 1990 , in accordance with the requirements of Section 118, Chapter 6 , Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah. The Director of ' Finance, acting as the City' s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public . The City Council fixed a time and place for a public hearing to be held on June 5, 1990 to consider the attached proposed amendments to the budget and ordered notice thereof be published as required by law. Notice of said public hearing to consider the amendments to said budget was duly published and a public hearing to consider the attached amendments to said budget was held on June 5, 1990 in accordance with said notice at r • (. which hearing all interested parties for and against the budget amendment proposals were heard and all comments were duly considered by the City Council. All conditions precedent to amend said budget have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City Utah: SECTION 1 . Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah as adopted by Salt Lake City Ordinance 36 of 1989 . SECTION 2 . Adoption of Amendments . The budget amendments attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 and ending June 30, 1990, in accordance with requirements of Section 128 , Chapter 6 , Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated. SECTION 3 . Certification to Utah State Auditor. The Director of the City' s Finance Department, acting as the City' s Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments with the Utah State Auditor. SECTION 4 . Filing of Copies of the Budget Amendments . The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City -2- 11. Recorder, which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 5 . Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990 . SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Approved by the Mayor this day of , 1990 . MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt La -City Attorney's Office Date 4• /9A 0 411744,14 CITY RECORDER By --NEIM. FMN:cc (SEAL) Bill No. of 1990 Published -3- 7• dr 1 PALMER DEPAULIS SILK ,`IJ`` �EMARglj MAYOR OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7704 May 29, 1990 Alan Hardman, Chairperson Salt Lake City Council 451 South State Street, Room 304 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Alan: Attached is a copy of Budget Amendment #6. This is scheduled as a budget opening on May 29th. The Finance Department and those involved will be available May 29th to answer any questions. Sincerely, Mayor rbc Attachment `1990 Budget Amendment N6 June 5, 1990 page 1 of 2 I MAJOR FUND CLASSIFICATIONS I INTERNAL CAPITAL EXPLANATION AGENCY/ GENERAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE IMPROVEMENT SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OTHER PROJECT OR OF DEPARTMENT FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUND GRANT OTHER FUNDS FUND CLASS AMENDMENT REQUEST Non-Departmental Appropriate rental income from the (GIP) 440,000 Ben Albert Apt. Canterbury Apppt. project in order to do major repairs A6,569 500 5./700-900 E. on the BeA pn propriatets p p property owner share of revenue to this project. 300.000 Cty/Cnty Landfill Appropriate SL County revenue for construction at the Landfill. 4,067 California Ave. Appropriate funds received from the State which were reimbursed for the Railroad Safety project which is closed out. These funds will be used for the California Avenue project. -2.120,000 Steiner Aquatics This budget is being eliminated. It is the original and one amendment for bond proceeds for this project. The project is being accounted for and the bonds were sold by the Municipal Bldg. Authority end the actual amount of bonds purchased will be budgeted for in the MBA now and not in the CIP. 38,000 Misc. Facility One time savings from budgeted FY89-90 Repair (90-91) interest expense will be used to replace under- ground storage tanks located on Park Department property. 102,000 MHJ Complex & Facility Services of the Human Resource/ Pub.Safe.Bidg. Administrative Services Department has identified several urgent needs for major renovations at the Metro Hall and Public Safety Bldg. locations. They have identified some one time savings from the FY89- 90 utility budget which they would like to use to cover these CIP needs. 42,500 3rd Circuit Court The 3rd Circuit Court Building is in need Building of some major rennovations and major repairs and upgrades. We have recently renegotiated our rental agreements with the State and have increased the rental charges. Along with this increase we need to renew a commitment to make these needed building repairs, etc. We are proposing to use a small amount of General Fund contingency to cover this one time expenditure. -39,000 Surplus Property This reduction from the surplus property Account account will repay the General Fund for the emergency loan made in March for the traffic signal on California Ave. Non-Departmental 2,960,497 Municipal Bldg. This adjustment will appropriate all funds (Mun.Bldg.Auth) Authority necessary to account for the Steiner Aquatics Cntr. whichct willall 'own' the the ass sts.Municipal Building have9beenAuthority accounted for in the CIP fund until now. This includes the following: From the CIP fund of SL City (S813,838). From the SL Recreation ,Inc. (S232,000). From the SL City School Dist. (S100,000). From Bond Proceeds (S1,814,659). Non-Departmental 98,000 Emergency Shelter This adjustment will add Federal grant (Misc. Grants) Grant funds and create a new Shelter project to provide operating and other needs for the homeless shelter. Non-Departmental -17,231 Retirement Plan Recently several requests have been (Contingency) Payments submitted by the State Retirement System to the City to pay retirement costs owing to employees who had previously been employed part time. These employees were eligible for this contribution but the City was unaware at the time that it had an obligation to pay We are proposing to use contingency funds to pay these costs now and will submit any others received as they become known at a later date. -35,000 Parks Water The Parks Department needs additional funds to cover their anticipated water needs this spring. -42,500 3rd Circuit Court This amount will transfer to CIP to cover (Transfers) 42,500 the 3rd Circuit Court project discussed above. Non-Departmental 147,371 147,371 Fleet Replacement This amount will come from the Fire Dept. (Transfers) (Fire Apparatus) and will be transferred to Fleet and used to buy a mobile breathing apparatus. 102,000 CIP Projects This amount will come from the HRAS Dept. (Facility Services) and will be transferred to the CIP to fund projects at MHJ and the Public Safety Building which are discussed above. 38,000 CIP Projects S38,000 will come from one time savings in (interest exp.) -38,000 the FY89-90 interest expense budget in Non-Dept. and will be transferred to CIP to fund the storage tank replacements for Parks, and S36,730 will be 36,730 36,730 Computer equip. transferred to the Information Management Services (interest exp.) -36,730 (in-house sia lnt) fund budget to fund a one time purchase of data processing equipment needed to implement the in- house micro-maintenance program which will save S57,000 in General Fund costs beginning in FY90-91. 112.400 112.400 Risk Management and 5112.400 wil: be transferred to Risk Mgmt. to (interest exp.) -112,400 (Health Insurance) cover part of the remaining health insurance fund deficit. Finance, Fire, 17,231 G.F Contingency Transfer General Fund Contingency to cover Mayor. Public the cost of Utah State Retirement System paybacks Works for part-time employees. • page 2 of 2 I MAJOR FUND CLASSIFICATIONS I INTERNAL CAPITAL EXPLANATION AGENCY/ GENERAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE IMPROVEMENT SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OTHER PROJECT OR DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUND GRANT OTHER FUNDS FUND CLASS TOTALS AMENDMENT REQUEST Fire -147,371 Fleet Vehicle Transfer capital outlay to Non-Dept. transfers for a mobile breathing apparatus. Human Resource & -102,000 Utility Savings Transfer savings from utility budget to Adman. Services (CIP Projects) Non-Dept. to create CIP projects for the MHJ Complex, Public Safety Building, as discussed above. 2,000 State Funds Appropriate funds from the State to 'Gift' preserve the 1890 Liberty Park Master Plan (water color) drawing. Parks 35,000 Water Appropriate General Fund contingency to Parks to cover costs associated with additional water used because of an unseasonally dry summer and fall in 1989. Public Utilities 1,362,943 Water Utility Appropriate additional revenue from water sales, interest income, grants, and other related income and adjust loan amount from Metro water, and approriate reserves to do the following: Purchase additional water from Metropolitan Water and cover the additional power costs which were needed because of a dry summer and fall of 1989 and a dry spring so far this year (S200,000). Additional construction costs, meter replacement, data - equipment, and truck purchases. (S1,182,943). Totals 2,000 1,382,943 3,266,998 -1,225,864 98,000 0 0 3,514,077 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1989-90 Amended Amended Budget 6/05/90 Budget 1989-90 Amendments 1989-90 Resources • Revenue Taxes: Property Taxes $25.042,046 $ - $25,042,046 Sales and Use Taxes 21,345,156 - 21,345,156 Franchise Taxes 14,634,736 - 14,634,736 Total Taxes 61,021,938 0 61,021,938 Other Current Revenue: Licenses and Permits 4,115,630 - 4,115,630 Fines and Forfeitures 3,183.640 - 3,183,640 Interest • 2,621.670 - 2,621,670 Charges for Services 2,314,172 - 2,314.172 State Beer/Liquor Tax 450,000 - 450,000 Intergovernmental Revenue 1,736,209 2,000 1,738,209 Parking Meter Collections 1,282,862 - 1.282,862 • Interfund Reimbursement 3,881,821 - 3.881,821 Other Revenue 153,500 - 153,500 Total Other Current Revenue 19,739,504 2,000 19,741,504 Other Sources Transfer-in From Other Funds 2,266,118 - 2,266,118 Total Other Sources 2,266,118 0 2,266,118 Total Resources • $83,027,560 $2,000 $83,029,560 Uses Expenditures Attorney $1,229,213 $ - $1,229,213 City Council 572,764 - 572,764 Community and Economic Dev. 3,498,585 - 3,498,585 Finance 4.222,390 968 4,223,358 Fire 17,780,680 -146,372 17.634,308 Human Res. Mgt. & Ad. Serv. 3,948,886 -100,000 3,848,886 Mayor 894,658 5,528 900,186 Non Departmental 3,609.448 -187,130 3,422,318 Parks 5,724,986 35,000 5,759,986 Police 19,223,533 - 19,223,533 Public Works 14,315,986 9,736 14,325,722 Total Expenditures 75,021,129 -382,270 74,638,859 Other Uses Interfund Transfers: Street Lighting Fund 102,668 - 102,668 Capital Projects Fund 5,019,000 180,230 5,199,230 Refuse Collection Fund 555,915 - 555,915 Fleet Replacement Fund 2,139,500 147,371 2,286,871 Demolition Fund 20,000 - 20,000 Weed Abatement Fund 15,000 - 15,000 Governmental Immunity 63.532 - 63,532 Risk Management Fund - 112,400 112,400 Data Processing Fund - - 0 Contingency 90,816 -55,731 35,085 Total Other Uses 8,006,431 384,270 8.390.701 Total Uses $83,027,560 $2,000 $83,029,560 y WATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1989-90 Amended Budget 6/05/90 Budget 1989-90 Amendments 1989-90 Resources Revenues Sales/Charges for Services $18,662,000 $500,000 $19,162,000 Rate Increase 1.969,746 - 1.969,746 Interest Income 350,000 350,000 700,000 Other Revenue 972,000 - 972,000 Total Revenues 21,953.746 850,000 22.803,746 Other Sources Grants/Other Related Revenue 2,300,000 700,000 3,000,000 Transfer from Reservoir & Supply Line Fees 26,300 - 26.300 Bond Proceeds - - - Loan From Sewer Utility 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 Loan From Metro. Water Dist. 475,000 -475,000 - Reserve for Improvements 2,713,700 307,943 3,021,643 Total Other Sources 7,015,000 532,943 7,547,943 Total Resources $28,968,746 $1,382,943 $30,351,689 Uses Expenditures Personal Services $7,820,943 $ - $7,820,943 Operating and Maintenance 1.184,750 - 1,184,750 Travel/Training 19,000 - 19,000 Utilities 1,667,450 100,000 1,767,450 Professional & Tech. Service 476.000 - 476,000 Contractual Services 29,000 - 29,000 Interfund Charges: Data Processing 390,600 50,000 440.600 Fleet Maintenance 495,540 - 495,540 Risk Management 74,000 - 74.000 Gen.Fund Admin.Service Fee 570,709 - 570.709 Transfers Metrop. Water Purch. & Treat 2,700,000 100,000 2,800,000 Other Charges & Services 123,700 - 123,700 Total Expenditures 15,551,692 250,000 15,801,692 Other Uses Capital Outlay 1.137,084 50,000 1,187,084 Capital Improvements Budget 9,398,190 1,082,943 10,481,133 Debt Service: Principal 999,350 - 999,350 Interest 1,882,430 - 1,882,430 Total Other Uses 13.417,054 1,132,943 14.549,997 Total Uses $28,968,746 1,382,943 $30,351,689 Z PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER UTILITY FUND PROJECT DETAIL FOR PROPOSED BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR YEAR 1989 -1990 1989-90 1989-90 DEPARTMENT / PROJECT CAPITAL PROPOSED AMENDED PUBLIC UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS AMENDMENT BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED 1989-90 PROJECTS IMPROVEMENTS TO PARLEY'S PLANT ENGINEERING 200, 000 200, 000 CONSTRUCTION (TOTAL PROJECT 12 MILLION) 1 , 540, 000 1 , 540, 000 13TH SOUTH REDWOOD TO 8TH WEST 1 , 200, 000 -200, 000 1 , 000, 000 TETON TANKS TO CRESTWOOD DR 22, 000 22, 000 CALIFORNIA GLADIOLA TO PIONEER 475, 000 475, 000 NORTH TEMPLE 2200 - 3800 WEST 120, 000 120, 000 GLADIOLA CALIFORNIA TO 500 SOUTH 330, 000 330, 000 BASKIN RESERVIOR COVER 140, 000 140, 000 FAYETTE AVE MAIN TO WEST TEMPLE 30, 000 30, 000 1100 EAST AND 4800 SOUTH WELL - 50, 000 50, 000 AFFLECK PARK WATER LINE 8, 000 -8 , 000 0 700 WEST 1700 TO 2100 SOUTH 250, 000 250, 000 OAK HILLS RESERVOIR AND LINE 350, 000 350, 000 62ND SOUTH PUMP STATION 60, 000 60, 000 WALKER LANE WELL 50, 000 50, 000 TANNER RESERVOIR 150, 000 -150, 000 0 900 WEST 2100 TO 2250 SOUTH 140, 000 -140, 000 0 300 EAST 1700 TO 2100 SOUTH 360, 000 360, 000 1300 WEST ILLINOIS TO MEAD AVE 48, 000 -48, 000 0 CATHERINE ST 1000 N TO GOODWIN 39, 000 39, 000 BECK STREET 900 TO 1300 NORTH 167, 057 -167, 057 0 OAKLEY STREET 1200 NORTH /DUPONT 35, 000 35, 000 PUBLIC WORK PROJECTS 50, 000 50, 000 FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENT 30, 000 30, 000 VALVES 20, 000 20, 000 DONATED LINES 100, 000 100, 000 VARIOUS WATER LINES 102, 433 102, 433 900 WEST 2250 TO 2500 SOUTH 0 AND 2500 SOUTH 800 TO 900 WEST 183, 000 183, 000 EASTWOOD DRIVE 29, 000 -29, 000 0 WARR ROAD 38, 000 38, 000 2700 EAST NORA DR TO NILA WAY 100, 000 100, 000 TOTAL PROJECTS 6, 416, 490 -742, 057 5, 674, 433 3 PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER UTILITY FUND PROJECT DETAIL FOR PROPOSED BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR YEAR 1989 -1990 1989-90 1989-90 DEPARTMENT / PROJECT CAPITAL PROPOSED AMENDED PUBLIC UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS AMENDMENT BUDGET TOTAL ----------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW PROJECTS RAINER TANK & SUPPLY LINE 150, 000 150, 000 5600 W-700/2100 SOUTH EAST TO 4500 WEST 1 , 200, 000 1 , 200 , 000 13TH SOUTH 5600 WEST TO LANDFILL 75, 000 75 , 000 TOTAL NEW PROJECTS 0 1 , 425 , 000 1 , 425, 000 NEW SERVICES SMALL METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 421 , 200 100 , 000 521 , 200 NEW SERVICES 135 , 000 135 , 000 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT 500, 000 100, 000 600, 000 LARGE METER RERPLACEMENT PROGRAM 365, 500 200, 000 565 , 500 1 , 421 , 700 400 , 000 1 , 821 , 700 OTHER EQUIPMENT WATER STOCK 30, 000 30, 000 LAND PURCHASES 1 , 500, 000 1 , 500, 000 CULVERTS FLUMES & BRIDGES 30, 000 30, 000 TRUCKS AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT 663, 000 50, 000 713, 000 PUMPING EQUIPMENT 57, 500 57, 500 TELEMETERING 200, 000 200, 000 TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT 64, 000 64 , 000 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 40, 489 40, 489 OTHER EQUIPMENT 112, 095 112, 095 BUDGETED OTHER EQUIPMENT 2, 697, 084 50, 000 2, 747, 084 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 10, 535, 274 1 , 132, 943 11 , 668, 217 ro FLEET MANAGEMENT INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 1 C) BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1989-90 Budget 6/O5/90 Amended Budget 1989-90 Amendments 1989-90 J • Resources Revenue Charges for Services $4,730,377 $ - $4,730,377 Other Revenue 83,000 - 83,000 Total Revenue 4,813.377 - 4,813,377 Other Sources Charges for Replacement Transfer from General Fund 2,139,500 147,371 2,286,871 Interest 30.000 - 30,000 Insurance Claims-Replacement - - 0 Sale of Vehicles - - 0 From Reserves/Fund Balance 1,939,875 - 1,939,875 Total Other Sources 4,109,375 147,371 4,256,746 Total Resources $8,922,752 $147,371 $9,070,123 I Uses Expenditures Personal Services $1,984,437 $ - $1,984,437 Materials and Supplies 2,066,773 - 2,066,773 Data Processing Services 55,084 - 55,084 Towing 16,275 - 16,275 Utilities 144,766 - 144,766 Risk Management Premiums 117,790 - 117,790 Admin. Service Fees-G.F. 231,453 - 231,453 Contractual Services 70.000 - 70,000 Other Charges and Services 34,775 - 34,775 Total Expenditures 4,721.353 0 4,721,353 Other Uses Transfer to General Fund - - - Capital Outlay: Maintenance 77,000 - 77,000 Vehicles 4,119,375 147,371 4,266,746 Contingency 5,024 - 5,024 Total Other Uses 4,201,399 147,371 4,348,770 Total Uses $8,922,752 $147,371 $9,070,123 5 • PALMER DEPAULIS IA42 MIM)1°1� j MAYOR •OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7704 May 29, 1990 Alan Hardman, Chairperson Salt Lake City Council 451 South State Street, Room 304 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Alan: Attached is a copy of Budget Amendment #6. This is scheduled as a budget opening on May 29th. The Finance Department and those involved will be available May 29th to answer any questions. Sincerely, Mayor rbc Attachment `1990 Budget Amendment N6 June 5, 1990 page 1 of 2 I MAJOR FUND CLASSIFICATIONS I INTERNAL CAPITAL EXPLANATION AGENCY/ GENERAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE IMPROVEMENT SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OTHER PROJECT OR OF DEPARTMENT FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUND GRANT OTHER FUNDS FUND CLASS AMENDMENT REQUEST Non-Departmental Appropriate rental income from the (GIP) 440,000 Ben Albert Apt. Canterbury Apppt. project in order to do major repairs A6,569 500 5./700-900 E. on the BeA pn propriatets p p property owner share of revenue to this project. 300.000 Cty/Cnty Landfill Appropriate SL County revenue for construction at the Landfill. 4,067 California Ave. Appropriate funds received from the State which were reimbursed for the Railroad Safety project which is closed out. These funds will be used for the California Avenue project. -2.120,000 Steiner Aquatics This budget is being eliminated. It is the original and one amendment for bond proceeds for this project. The project is being accounted for and the bonds were sold by the Municipal Bldg. Authority end the actual amount of bonds purchased will be budgeted for in the MBA now and not in the CIP. 38,000 Misc. Facility One time savings from budgeted FY89-90 Repair (90-91) interest expense will be used to replace under- ground storage tanks located on Park Department property. 102,000 MHJ Complex & Facility Services of the Human Resource/ Pub.Safe.Bidg. Administrative Services Department has identified several urgent needs for major renovations at the Metro Hall and Public Safety Bldg. locations. They have identified some one time savings from the FY89- 90 utility budget which they would like to use to cover these CIP needs. 42,500 3rd Circuit Court The 3rd Circuit Court Building is in need Building of some major rennovations and major repairs and upgrades. We have recently renegotiated our rental agreements with the State and have increased the rental charges. Along with this increase we need to renew a commitment to make these needed building repairs, etc. We are proposing to use a small amount of General Fund contingency to cover this one time expenditure. -39,000 Surplus Property This reduction from the surplus property Account account will repay the General Fund for the emergency loan made in March for the traffic signal on California Ave. Non-Departmental 2,960,497 Municipal Bldg. This adjustment will appropriate all funds (Mun.Bldg.Auth) Authority necessary to account for the Steiner Aquatics Cntr. whichct willall 'own' the the ass sts.Municipal Building have9beenAuthority accounted for in the CIP fund until now. This includes the following: From the CIP fund of SL City (S813,838). From the SL Recreation ,Inc. (S232,000). From the SL City School Dist. (S100,000). From Bond Proceeds (S1,814,659). Non-Departmental 98,000 Emergency Shelter This adjustment will add Federal grant (Misc. Grants) Grant funds and create a new Shelter project to provide operating and other needs for the homeless shelter. Non-Departmental -17,231 Retirement Plan Recently several requests have been (Contingency) Payments submitted by the State Retirement System to the City to pay retirement costs owing to employees who had previously been employed part time. These employees were eligible for this contribution but the City was unaware at the time that it had an obligation to pay We are proposing to use contingency funds to pay these costs now and will submit any others received as they become known at a later date. -35,000 Parks Water The Parks Department needs additional funds to cover their anticipated water needs this spring. -42,500 3rd Circuit Court This amount will transfer to CIP to cover (Transfers) 42,500 the 3rd Circuit Court project discussed above. Non-Departmental 147,371 147,371 Fleet Replacement This amount will come from the Fire Dept. (Transfers) (Fire Apparatus) and will be transferred to Fleet and used to buy a mobile breathing apparatus. 102,000 CIP Projects This amount will come from the HRAS Dept. (Facility Services) and will be transferred to the CIP to fund projects at MHJ and the Public Safety Building which are discussed above. 38,000 CIP Projects S38,000 will come from one time savings in (interest exp.) -38,000 the FY89-90 interest expense budget in Non-Dept. and will be transferred to CIP to fund the storage tank replacements for Parks, and S36,730 will be 36,730 36,730 Computer equip. transferred to the Information Management Services (interest exp.) -36,730 (in-house sia lnt) fund budget to fund a one time purchase of data processing equipment needed to implement the in- house micro-maintenance program which will save S57,000 in General Fund costs beginning in FY90-91. 112.400 112.400 Risk Management and 5112.400 wil: be transferred to Risk Mgmt. to (interest exp.) -112,400 (Health Insurance) cover part of the remaining health insurance fund deficit. Finance, Fire, 17,231 G.F Contingency Transfer General Fund Contingency to cover Mayor. Public the cost of Utah State Retirement System paybacks Works for part-time employees. • page 2 of 2 I MAJOR FUND CLASSIFICATIONS I INTERNAL CAPITAL EXPLANATION AGENCY/ GENERAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE IMPROVEMENT SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OTHER PROJECT OR DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUND GRANT OTHER FUNDS FUND CLASS TOTALS AMENDMENT REQUEST Fire -147,371 Fleet Vehicle Transfer capital outlay to Non-Dept. transfers for a mobile breathing apparatus. Human Resource & -102,000 Utility Savings Transfer savings from utility budget to Adman. Services (CIP Projects) Non-Dept. to create CIP projects for the MHJ Complex, Public Safety Building, as discussed above. 2,000 State Funds Appropriate funds from the State to 'Gift' preserve the 1890 Liberty Park Master Plan (water color) drawing. Parks 35,000 Water Appropriate General Fund contingency to Parks to cover costs associated with additional water used because of an unseasonally dry summer and fall in 1989. Public Utilities 1,362,943 Water Utility Appropriate additional revenue from water sales, interest income, grants, and other related income and adjust loan amount from Metro water, and approriate reserves to do the following: Purchase additional water from Metropolitan Water and cover the additional power costs which were needed because of a dry summer and fall of 1989 and a dry spring so far this year (S200,000). Additional construction costs, meter replacement, data - equipment, and truck purchases. (S1,182,943). Totals 2,000 1,382,943 3,266,998 -1,225,864 98,000 0 0 3,514,077 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1989-90 Amended Amended Budget 6/05/90 Budget 1989-90 Amendments 1989-90 Resources • Revenue Taxes: Property Taxes $25.042,046 $ - $25,042,046 Sales and Use Taxes 21,345,156 - 21,345,156 Franchise Taxes 14,634,736 - 14,634,736 Total Taxes 61,021,938 0 61,021,938 Other Current Revenue: Licenses and Permits 4,115,630 - 4,115,630 Fines and Forfeitures 3,183.640 - 3,183,640 Interest 2,621.670 - 2,621,670 Charges for Services 2,314,172 - 2,314.172 State Beer/Liquor Tax 450,000 - 450,000 Intergovernmental Revenue 1,736,209 2,000 1,738,209 Parking Meter Collections 1,282,862 - 1.282,862 • Interfund Reimbursement 3,881,821 - 3.881,821 Other Revenue 153,500 - 153,500 Total Other Current Revenue 19,739,504 2,000 19,741,504 Other Sources Transfer-in From Other Funds 2,266,118 - 2,266,118 Total Other Sources 2,266,118 0 2,266,118 Total Resources • $83,027,560 $2,000 $83,029,560 Uses Expenditures Attorney $1,229,213 $ - $1,229,213 City Council 572,764 - 572,764 Community and Economic Dev. 3,498,585 - 3,498,585 Finance 4.222,390 968 4,223,358 Fire 17,780,680 -146,372 17.634,308 Human Res. Mgt. & Ad. Serv. 3,948,886 -100,000 3,848,886 Mayor 894,658 5,528 900,186 Non Departmental 3,609.448 -187,130 3,422,318 Parks 5,724,986 35,000 5,759,986 Police 19,223,533 - 19,223,533 Public Works 14,315,986 9,736 14,325,722 Total Expenditures 75,021,129 -382,270 74,638,859 Other Uses Interfund Transfers: Street Lighting Fund 102,668 - 102,668 Capital Projects Fund 5,019,000 180,230 5,199,230 Refuse Collection Fund 555,915 - 555,915 Fleet Replacement Fund 2,139,500 147,371 2,286,871 Demolition Fund 20,000 - 20,000 Weed Abatement Fund 15,000 - 15,000 Governmental Immunity 63.532 - 63,532 Risk Management Fund - 112,400 112,400 Data Processing Fund - - 0 Contingency 90,816 -55,731 35,085 Total Other Uses 8,006,431 384,270 8.390.701 Total Uses $83,027,560 $2,000 $83,029,560 y WATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1989-90 Amended Budget 6/05/90 Budget 1989-90 Amendments 1989-90 Resources Revenues Sales/Charges for Services $18,662,000 $500,000 $19,162,000 Rate Increase 1.969,746 - 1.969,746 Interest Income 350,000 350,000 700,000 Other Revenue 972,000 - 972,000 Total Revenues 21,953.746 850,000 22.803,746 Other Sources Grants/Other Related Revenue 2,300,000 700,000 3,000,000 Transfer from Reservoir & Supply Line Fees 26,300 - 26.300 Bond Proceeds - - - Loan From Sewer Utility 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 Loan From Metro. Water Dist. 475,000 -475,000 - Reserve for Improvements 2,713,700 307,943 3,021.643 Total Other Sources 7,015,000 532,943 7,547,943 Total Resources $28,968,746 $1,382,943 S30,351,689 Uses Expenditures Personal Services S7,820,943 $ - $7,820,943 Operating and Maintenance 1,184,750 - 1,184.750 Travel/Training 19,000 - 19,000 Utilities 1,667,450 100,000 1,767,450 Professional & Tech. Service 476.000 - 476,000 Contractual Services 29,000 - 29,000 Interfund Charges: Data Processing 390,600 50,000 440.600 Fleet Maintenance 495,540 - 495,540 Risk Management 74,000 - 74.000 Gen.Fund Admin.Service Fee 570,709 - 570.709 Transfers Metrop. Water Purch. & Treat 2,700,000 100,000 2,800,000 Other Charges & Services 123,700 - 123,700 Total Expenditures 15,551,692 250,000 15,801,692 Other Uses Capital Outlay 1,137,084 50,000 1,187,084 Capital Improvements Budget 9,398,190 1,082,943 10,481,133 Debt Service: Principal 999,350 - 999,350 Interest 1,882,430 - 1,882,430 Total Other Uses 13.417,054 1,132,943 14.549,997 Total Uses S28,968,746 1,382,943 $30,351,689 Z PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER UTILITY FUND PROJECT DETAIL FOR PROPOSED BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR YEAR 1989 -1990 1989-90 1989-90 DEPARTMENT / PROJECT CAPITAL PROPOSED AMENDED PUBLIC UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS AMENDMENT BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED 1989-90 PROJECTS IMPROVEMENTS TO PARLEY'S PLANT ENGINEERING 200, 000 200, 000 CONSTRUCTION (TOTAL PROJECT 12 MILLION) 1 , 540, 000 1 , 540, 000 13TH SOUTH REDWOOD TO 8TH WEST 1 , 200, 000 -200, 000 1 , 000, 000 TETON TANKS TO CRESTWOOD DR 22, 000 22, 000 CALIFORNIA GLADIOLA TO PIONEER 475, 000 475, 000 NORTH TEMPLE 2200 - 3800 WEST 120, 000 120, 000 GLADIOLA CALIFORNIA TO 500 SOUTH 330, 000 330, 000 BASKIN RESERVIOR COVER 140, 000 140, 000 FAYETTE AVE MAIN TO WEST TEMPLE 30, 000 30, 000 1100 EAST AND 4800 SOUTH WELL - 50, 000 50, 000 AFFLECK PARK WATER LINE 8, 000 -8 , 000 0 700 WEST 1700 TO 2100 SOUTH 250, 000 250, 000 OAK HILLS RESERVOIR AND LINE 350, 000 350, 000 62ND SOUTH PUMP STATION 60, 000 60, 000 WALKER LANE WELL 50, 000 50, 000 TANNER RESERVOIR 150, 000 -150, 000 0 900 WEST 2100 TO 2250 SOUTH 140, 000 -140, 000 0 300 EAST 1700 TO 2100 SOUTH 360, 000 360, 000 1300 WEST ILLINOIS TO MEAD AVE 48, 000 -48, 000 0 CATHERINE ST 1000 N TO GOODWIN 39, 000 39, 000 BECK STREET 900 TO 1300 NORTH 167, 057 -167, 057 0 OAKLEY STREET 1200 NORTH /DUPONT 35, 000 35, 000 PUBLIC WORK PROJECTS 50, 000 50, 000 FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENT 30, 000 30, 000 VALVES 20, 000 20, 000 DONATED LINES 100, 000 100, 000 VARIOUS WATER LINES 102, 433 102, 433 900 WEST 2250 TO 2500 SOUTH 0 AND 2500 SOUTH 800 TO 900 WEST 183, 000 183, 000 EASTWOOD DRIVE 29, 000 -29, 000 0 WARR ROAD 38, 000 38, 000 2700 EAST NORA DR TO NILA WAY 100, 000 100, 000 TOTAL PROJECTS 6, 416, 490 -742, 057 5, 674, 433 3 PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER UTILITY FUND PROJECT DETAIL FOR PROPOSED BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR YEAR 1989 -1990 1989-90 1989-90 DEPARTMENT / PROJECT CAPITAL PROPOSED AMENDED PUBLIC UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS AMENDMENT BUDGET TOTAL ----------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW PROJECTS RAINER TANK & SUPPLY LINE 150, 000 150, 000 5600 W-700/2100 SOUTH EAST TO 4500 WEST 1 , 200, 000 1 , 200 , 000 13TH SOUTH 5600 WEST TO LANDFILL 75, 000 75 , 000 TOTAL NEW PROJECTS 0 1 , 425 , 000 1 , 425, 000 NEW SERVICES SMALL METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 421 , 200 100 , 000 521 , 200 NEW SERVICES 135 , 000 135 , 000 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT 500, 000 100, 000 600, 000 LARGE METER RERPLACEMENT PROGRAM 365, 500 200, 000 565 , 500 1 , 421 , 700 400 , 000 1 , 821 , 700 OTHER EQUIPMENT WATER STOCK 30, 000 30, 000 LAND PURCHASES 1 , 500, 000 1 , 500, 000 CULVERTS FLUMES & BRIDGES 30, 000 30, 000 TRUCKS AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT 663, 000 50, 000 713, 000 PUMPING EQUIPMENT 57, 500 57, 500 TELEMETERING 200, 000 200, 000 TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT 64, 000 64 , 000 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 40, 489 40, 489 OTHER EQUIPMENT 112, 095 112, 095 BUDGETED OTHER EQUIPMENT 2, 697, 084 50, 000 2, 747, 084 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 10, 535, 274 1 , 132, 943 11 , 668, 217 ro FLEET MANAGEMENT INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 1 C) BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1989-90 Budget 6/O5/90 Amended Budget 1989-90 Amendments 1989-90 J • Resources Revenue Charges for Services $4,730,377 $ - $4,730,377 Other Revenue 83,000 - 83,000 Total Revenue 4,813.377 - 4,813,377 Other Sources Charges for Replacement Transfer from General Fund 2,139,500 147,371 2,286,871 Interest 30.000 - 30,000 Insurance Claims-Replacement - - 0 Sale of Vehicles - - 0 From Reserves/Fund Balance 1,939,875 - 1,939,875 Total Other Sources 4,109,375 147,371 4,256,746 Total Resources $8,922,752 $147,371 $9,070,123 I Uses Expenditures Personal Services $1,984,437 $ - $1,984,437 Materials and Supplies 2,066,773 - 2,066,773 Data Processing Services 55,084 - 55,084 Towing 16,275 - 16,275 Utilities 144,766 - 144,766 Risk Management Premiums 117,790 - 117,790 Admin. Service Fees-G.F. 231,453 - 231,453 Contractual Services 70.000 - 70,000 Other Charges and Services 34,775 - 34,775 Total Expenditures 4,721.353 0 4,721,353 Other Uses Transfer to General Fund - - - Capital Outlay: Maintenance 77,000 - 77,000 Vehicles 4,119,375 147,371 4,266,746 Contingency 5,024 - 5,024 Total Other Uses 4,201,399 147,371 4,348,770 Total Uses $8,922,752 $147,371 $9,070,123 5 INFvnMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES INTERNAL SERVICE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1989-90 Amended Budget 6/05/90 Budget 1989-90 Amendments 1989-90 Resources Revenue Data Processing $3.751,837 $ - S3,751,837 Telephone (see note) 840,290 - 840,290 Other - 5,179 5,179 Total Revenue 4,592,127 5,179 4,597,306 Other Sources Transfer from General Fund - 36,730 36,730 From Reserve/Fund Balance 5,179 -5,179 - Total Other Sources 5,179 31,551 36,730 Total Resources $4,597,306 $36,730 $4,634,036 Uses Expenditures Personal Services $1,791,194 $ - $1,791,194 Materials and Supplies 82,027 - 82.027 Utilities 430,816 - 430,816 Equipment Maint. Contracts 381,210 - 381,210 Building Rental 158,035 - 158,035 Equipment and Software Lease 1,179.784 - 1,179,784 Telephone Lease Charges- MBA 338,000 - 338,000 Administrative fee to G.F. 74,533 - 74,533 Risk Management Charges 29,084 - 29,084 Fleet Management Charges 6,548 - 6,548 Other charges and Services 99,796 - 99,796 Total Expenditures 4,571,027 - 4,571,027 Other Uses Capital Purchases 26,279 36,730 63,009 Total Uses $4,597,306 S36.730 $4,634,036 C 1 RISK MANAGEMENT INTERNAL SERVICE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1989-90 Amended Budget 6/05/90 Budget 1989-90 Amendments 1989-90 Resources Revenue Insurance Premiums S11.486.377 S - S11,486,377 Other Revenue - - - Total Revenue 11,486,377 11,486,377 Other Sources Interest 35,000 - 35.000 Transfer from General Fund - 112.400 112.400 From Reserves/Fund Balance 47.600 - 47,600 Total Other Sources 82,600 112,400 195,000 Total Resources S11,568,977 $112,400 $11,681,377 Uses Expenditures Personal Services $1,035,471 $ - $1,035,471 Charges and Services 129,043 - 129,043 Claims 201.560 - 201,560 Insurance Premiums 9,364,814 - 9,364,814 Prescriptions - - - Administrative Fees - - - Admin. Service Fees-G.F. 76.665 - 76,665 Other Expenses 17.694 - 17.694 Total Expenditures 10.825.247 - 10.825,247 Other Uses Capital Outlay 1,500 - 1,500 Contingency 454,630 - 454.630 Interest - - - Transfer to General Fund 47,600 - 47.600 To Reserve/Fund Balance 240,000 112,400 352,400 Total Other Uses 743.730 112.400 856,130 Total Uses S11,568,977 $112,400 S11,681,377 7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITY INTERNAL SERVICE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1989-90 Amended Budget 6/05/90 Budget 1989-90 Amendments 1989-90 Resources Revenue Garbage Trucks/Cans Lease $785,000 $ - $785,000 Street Lights Lease-SID 135,000 - 135,000 Telephone System Lease 338,000 - 338,000 Public Safety Bldg and City' Share of Street Lights 1,044,416 - 1,044,416 Golf Course Lease 321,298 - 321,298 Total Revenue 2,623,714 - 2,623,714 Other Sources Bond Proceeds - 1,814,659 1,814,659 Interest-Capitalized Golf 12,000 - 12,000 Interest-Reserved 195,000 - 195,000 Interest-Golf Construction 198,065 - 198,065 From Reserves/Fund Balance 4,871,582 - 4,871,582 Transfer from CIP Fund - 813,838 813,838 Salt Lake Recreation Inc. - 232,000 232,000 Salt Lake City School Dist. - 100,000 100,000 Total Other Sources 5,276,647 2,960,497 8,237,144 Total Resources $7,900,361 $2,960,497 $10,860,858 Uses Other Uses Bond Issue Costs $ - $ - $ - Debt Service-Principal 1,395,000 - 1,395.000 Debt Service-Interest 1,814,859 - 1,814.859 Debt Service-Fees 13,200 - 13,200 Capital Purchases: - Golf Course Construction 4,677,302 - 4,677,302 Trucks and Cans - - - Street Lights - - - Telephone System - - - Public Safety Building - - - Steiner Aquatics Center - 2,960,497 2,960,497 Transfer to General Fund - -To Reserve/Fund Balance - - Total Uses $7,900,361 $2,960,497 $10,860,858 4 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1989-90 Amended Budget 6/05/90 Admin. Budget 1989-90 Amendments Adjustments 1989-90 Resources Transfer from General Fund S5,019,000 143.500 $ - S5,162,500 CDBG 1,712,482 - - 1,712.482 Salt Lake County 2,089,635 300,000 - 2,389,635 Class 'C' Road Fund 2,420,000 - - 2,420,000 Redevelopment Agency of SLC 2,103,000 - - 2,103,000 Bond Proceeds 2,120,000 -2,120,000 - 0 Property Owners 3,322,000 6,569 - 3,328,569 Charges for Services 203,500 440,000 - 643,500 State of Utah 4,256 4,067 - 8,323 Private donations 5,500 - - 5,500 Carryover Funds 12,035,357 - -132,619 11,902,738 Transfer from Debt Service Fd. 100.000 - - 100,000 Total Resources $31.134,730 ($1,225.864) ($132,619) $29.776,247 Uses (Projects) Street Improvements: Sidewalk SID 210.000 - - 210,000 Local Street SID 990,000 - - 990,000 400 South to 500 South 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 California Avenue 1.250,000 4,067 - 1.254,067 Central Bus. Dist. Beaut 2,400,000 - - 2,400,000 Traffic Safety Management 43,000 - - 43.000 Street Light Replacement 135,000 - - 135,000 100% Sidewalk Replacement 241,945 - - 241,945 Argyle/Edmonds 85,000 - - 85,000 Euclid 60,000 - - 60,000 500 South-700/900 East 590,000 6,569 - 596,569 Median Island Design 27,500 - - 27,500 Central City 5,000 - - 5,000 East Central 8,000 - - 8,000 Sugarhouse 35.000 - - 35,000 Future Street Redesign 18,000 - - 18,000 400 West Streets 40,000 - - 40,000 Main Street Curb & Gutter 20,000 - - 20,000 4-5th S.Connect-Red. to Pioneer 1,477,000 - - 1,477,000 Wakara Way/Colorow Drive Ext. 210,000 - - 210,000 Traffic Signal on Calif. Ave. 39,000 - - 39,000 Total Street Improvements 8.884,445 10,636 0 8,895,081 Drainage Improvements: State Street 430,000 - - 430,000 Main Street 424,000 - - 424,000 South Temple-'M'/'O' Streets 250,000 - - 250,000 500 West-250/530 North 9,000 - - 9,000 Total Drainage Improvements 1,113,000 0 0 1,113,000 Parks and Public Facilities: Canterbury/Ben Albert Apt. 60,000 440,000 - 500,000 City and County Building 3,366,500 - - 3,366,500 Miscellaneous Facilities Repair 150,000 182,500 - 332,500 Earthquake Hazard Imp 100,000 - - 100,000 Steiner Acquatics Center 2,791,000 -2,120,000 - 671,000 Tracy Aviary 150,000 - - 150.000 Fire Station #10 Construction 254,000 - - 254,000 Park Facilities Fund 143,500 - - 143,500 Jordan Park Irrigation/Walk 95,000 - - 95.000 Athletic Park-Phase II 50,000 - - 50,000 Poplar Grove Park Irrigation 73,000 - - 73,000 Farimont Pk. Improve. Design 10,000 - - 10,000 Urban Forestry Planting 50,000 - - 50,000 Marmalade Hill Center Rehab. 47,000 - - 47,000 Glendale Youth Center Design 25.000 - - 25.000 City/County Landfill 450,000 - - 450,000 Art Barn 5,500 - - 5.500 Public Safety Building 6,000 - - 6,000 City/Cnty Bldg. Lighting 100,000 - - 100,000 City/County Landfill 1,000,000 300,000 - 1.300.000 Total Parks and Pub. Fac. 8.926,500 -1,197,500 0 7.729,000 % for Art 19,787 - 0 19,787 Contingency(General Fund) 123,885 - - 123,885 Contingency(CDBG) 27,500 - - 27,500 Slippage 4.256 - - 4,256 Carryover Projects 12.035,357 -39,000 -132,619 11.863,738 Total Uses (Projects) $31,134,730 ($1,225,864) ($132,619) $29,776.247 GRANT OPERATING FUND SPECIAL REVENUE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1989-90 Amended Amended Budget 6/05/90 Admin. Budget 1989-90 Amendments Adjustments 1989-90 Resources State Grant $76.625 $ - $ - $76,625 UDAG Grant Repayments 679,198 - - 679,198 Utah Transit Authority 5,000 - - 5,000 Redevelopment Agency of SLC 15,000 - - 15,000 Federal Grant 246,000 98,000 - 344,000 STT UDAG Settlement account 2,500,000 - - 2,500,000 Salt Lake County 259,000 - -109,500 149,500 Prior year grant balances 714,516 - - 714,516 Program Income 131,519 - - 131,519 Private Donations $315,500 - - 315,500 Assisted Rental Payments $29.110 - - 29,110 Total Resources $4.971,468 898,000 ($109,500) $4,959,968 Uses Emergency Medical Services $109,660 $ - S - $109,660 UDAG Revolving Loan Program 679,198 - - 679,198 Downtown Parking Study 20,000 - - 20,000 1989-90 Renter Rehab. Program 352,519 - - 352,519 1988-89 Renter Rehab. Program 295.000 - - 295,000 1987-88 Renter Rehab. Program 165,223 - - 165,223 McKinney Shelter Project 62,000 - - 62,000 Urban Homestead Program 125,000 - - 125,000 Homeless Mentally I11 Study 219 - - 219 Employment Security Parking 2,500,000 - - 2,500,000 New Women's Shelter 534.500 - -109,500 425,000 El Centro Civico 6,840 - - 6,840 Hazardous Materials Program 27,199 - - 27,199 Youth Sports Club 25,000 - - 25,000 First Step Project 20,000 - - 20,000 New Hope Center Project 20,000 - - 20,000 Hartland Project 29,110 - - 29,110 Emergency Shelter Grant - 98,000 - 98,000 Total Uses $4,971,468 $98,000 ($109,500) 84,959,968 10 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT OPERATING FUND 1 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND ' BUDGET SUMMARY FY 1989-90 Amended Amended Budget 6/05/90 Admin. Budget 1989-90 Amendments Adjustments 1988-89 Resources 1989 (15th Year) Entitlement $2.539,850 $ - $ - $2,539,850 Prior Year Entitlements 1,289.150 - -159,980 1,129.170 Program Income 822,379 - - 822,379 Total Resources $4,651,379 SO ($159,980) S4.491.399 Uses Prior Year Projects: $1,085.501 $ - ($159.980) $925,521 Capitol Hill Revolving 14,213 - - 14,213 Administrative Contingency 15,000 - - 15,000 Capital Planning Admin. 49.000 - - 49,000 Rape Crisis Center 43.000 - - 43,000 Community Development Corp. 71,649 - - 71.649 Youth Sports Club 25.000 - - 25,000 Current Year Projects New Hope Cultural Center 16,000 - - 16.000 Capitol West Boys/Girls Club 28,500 - - 28.500 Housing Rehabilitation 1.506.402 - - 1,506,402 Alliance House Rehabilitation 11.000 - - 11.000 Assist 240,000. - - 240.000 NHS 90.000 - - 90,000 Security Lock Program 30,000 - - 30,000 Neighborhood Self-Help 15,000 - - 15,000 Neighborhood Attorney 7,000 - - 7,000 Oper New Men/Family Shelter 58,000 - - 58,000 Oper of Exist Womens Shelter 25,000 - - 25.000 Crime Prevention 81,000 - - 81,000 Environmental Assessment 7,500 - - 7,500 Westside Food Pantry 26,000 - - 26,000 Housing Outreach Rental 37,500 - - 37,500 Community Affair Admin 45.000 - - 45.000 Planning Administration 55.000 - - 55.000 Finance Administration 35,000 - - 35,000 Attorney Administration 42,000 - - 42,000 Capital Planning Admin 230,000 - - 230,000 Operation Paintbrush 40,000 - - 40,000 Clean & Secure Vacant Propert 21,764 - - 21.764 Boarded at Risk Bldg Asst 75,000 - - 75,000 Low Incom Housing Maint 13.000 - - 13.000 Community Development Corp 80,000 - - 80,000 Section 108 Canterbury Apt 300,000 - - 300,000 Crisis Nursery Rennovate 18.000 - - 18,000 First Step House Rennov 52,000 - - 52,000 Bike Path 200W 800S-300N 3,200 - - 3.200 Bike Path 300N 200-1200W 3,900 - - 3.900 Bike Path 800S 800-1000W 1,000 - - 1.000 Living Traditions Festival 15.000 - - 15,000 Downtown Plan Strategies 35.000 - - 35,000 Operating Contingency 54.250 - - 54,250 SLACC Administration 50.000 - - 50,000 Total Projects $4,651,379 $0 ($159,980) $4,491,399 mm DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Animal Impound Fee For Voluntary Relinquishment) AN ORDINANCE ENACTING SECTION 8.04.352, SALT LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO THE IMPOSITION OF AN IMPOUND FEE FOR VOLUNTARY RELINQUISHMENT OF DOGS AND CATS BY THE OWNER THEREOF TO THE ANIMAL CONTROL FACILITY. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That Chapter 8.04, Salt Lake City Code be amended by adding a new Section 8.04.352 thereto pertaining to impound fees for voluntary relinquishment of dogs and cats by the owner thereof to the Animal Control Facility, to read as follows: Section 8.04.352 Impound Fees For Voluntary Relinquishment By Owner. Whenever any dog or cat is voluntarily relinquished by the owner thereof to the Animal Control Facility for destruction or other disposition as provided by Section 8.04.340 A of this chapter, or its successor section, a fee shall be paid by said owner of $10.00 for each dog and $5.00 for each cat so relinquished. Section 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 1990. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 1990. Published: LVS:ap -2- : C ,,:„... Li ci. SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Amending subparagraph B and adding a new subparagraph G to Section 9 . 08 . 030 relating to Garbage pickup charges; changing the State Code reference in Section 9 . 08 . 030E to reflect the current State law for Indigent Abatement of Taxes ; and revising Section 9 . 08 . 070 relating to Refuse container specifications ) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBPARAGRAPH B. AND ADDING A NEW SUBPARAGRAPH G TO SECTION 9 . 08 . 030 RELATING TO GARBAGE PICKUP CHARGES; CHANGING THE STATE CODE REFERENCE IN SECTION 9 . 08 . 030E TO REFLECT THE CURRENT STATE LAW FOR INDIGENT ABATEMENT OF TAXES; AND REVISING SECTION 9 . 08 . 070 RELATING TO REFUSE CONTAINER SPECIFICATIONS , SALT LAKE CITY CODE. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That Subparagraph B of Section 9 . 08 . 030, Salt Lake City Code, relating to Garbage pickup charges, be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows : 9.08 .030 Residential collections. * * * A. Owner Responsible for Charges. * * * B. Garbage and Trash Pickup Charges. Monthly charges for garbage pickup service and the annual trash pickup provided by the city, shall be one dollar and twenty five cents per single family dwelling unit as determined by the director of public works , for the annual trash pickup, and five dollars and twenty five cents for the first automated container per single family dwelling unit [and Shall be bared en the number and type of Ip dwelling unit] from which garbage is collected[ , as follows: ] . Additional automated containers can be obtained for five dollars and twenty-five cents each, plus a delivery fee of ten dollars each. (1. Single-family dwelling writ, four dollars; 2 . Duplex family dwc3]i nit, eight dollars; pit, twelve dollar3; , each, two dollars .] C. Billing. * * * D. Deposits Required from Nonowners. * * * SECTION 2 . That subsection E of Section 9 . 08 . 030, Salt Lake City Code, be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows: E. Abatement. Those owners, each year, granted indigent abatement for taxes on their dwelling by Salt Lake County under Section [a-9 . 7 . 2, ] 59-2-1106, et seq. , Utah Code Annotated, or its successor ordinance, shall be granted a fifty percent annual abatement of the above garbage pickup charges. F. Enterprise Fund. * * * SECTION 3 . That a new subparagraph G to Section 9 . 08 . 030, Salt Lake City Code, relating to Vacancies, be, and the same hereby is, added to read as follows: G. Vacancies. In the event a residence being served is vacant and the owner is trying to sell it, or it is or will be vacant because of an extended vacation of the occupant, the owner -2- may apply to the public works director in writing for termination of garbage service for a specified period. The city container(s ) will be picked up and returned pursuant to the owner' s request upon payment of a ten dollar service fee. If said service fee is paid, no garbage collection fee shall be charged during the period of vacancy. SECTION 4 . That Section 9 . 08 . 070 , Salt Lake City Code, relating to Refuse container specifications, be, and the same hereby is , revised to read as follows : 9 .08.070 Refuse container specifications. A. This section shall apply only to collections made by the city or a private contractor working for the city. [Unless owner, tenant, les-see er occupant of any residence. ] In the event any container that does not conform to the provisions of this section is set out for collection, the collector shall have the authority to deny collection services for such container. Any container not meeting the requirements of this section will be tagged by the collector, and shall not be used again, but shall promptly be replaced by the user thereof . B. Containers must meet the following specifications : [ 1 . Reusable Containers for Manual Collection. a. Must be metal, plastic er rubber, tapercd construction, -equipped with suitable handles, tight- fitting covers and be leakproof; -3- � - r b. Must be in good condition and not have any (7) ragged or sharp edges, er any- ether defect liable to hamper or injure the persen collecting the contents therco ,-- c. Shall hay five pounds, including container and contents, when oct out for collection; d. The City shall not be responsible for normal wear and tear of eontainers nor for any damage or breakage to rubber or plastic containers; c. The following shall not be considered reusable containely : C. I . eanu, -washtubs, cut down drums, cardboard eanistere, buckets, baskets and trash compactor buckets; ;and, if used, shall be tagged and if used again, shall bc removed. 2 . Nonrcusable Containers for Manual Collection. a. Plastic bags met bc two mil thick or greater, have a maximum capacity of thirty gallons, and weigh net more than fifty pounds when filled. However, if such plastic bags are used only €er leaves, such bags may be a minimum of 1.5 mil in thickness; b. ra3tebeard boxe3 meat have a maximum capacity of four cubic feet, weigh not more than fifty pounds when filled, and be dry at the time of -4- meat--bc collapscd and tied in a bundle fer diapeaal in accordance with cub3cction D3 below; c . Wooden bexee, barrel3 and other similar gallon3 and weigh net mere than forty pound3 when filled; d. Nonreu3ablc containers shall be considered refuse and be removed fer dispooal along with their contents . [ 3 . Noncontaincrreed Items (Dundle3) for Manual Collection. in bundles which shall net e eecd-eighteen inches in diameter, more than fifty inehe3 in length or weigh more than ferty pc-untie . Empty bexce shall be tied in bundles less than fear feet ag-nure and weigh less than forty pounds . 4 . Automated Containers. 1 . [a-]Automated containers shall be made available by the city, and shall be made from durable plastic with a close fitting lid and shall be designed for collection by automated refuse collection vehicles . These containers shall be of such durability that they will be warranted for a minimum of five years of normal use. -5- b 0 2 . [ ]Damage to such container caused by hot ashes, clinkers, hot oil or any other material or substance that cuts, melts or ignites the container or other materials shall be paid for by the owner. 3 . [e-]No rocks, dirt or concrete shall be placed in automated containers . 4 . [d-]Residences using automated containers shall place all material to be collected within the container or containers No cans, boxes, barrels or bundled refuse other than that contained in the automated containers shall be collected. There is no limit on the number of automated containers that may be obtained form the city and then placed out for collection. 5 . [e:]The first automated container shall be supplied without charge. Other than the uniform refuse collection fee imposed to all eligible city residences, additional containers shall be suppled upon request at such additional charge as set forth elsewhere in this title. SECTION 5 . This ordinance shall take effect upon the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990. CHAIRPERSON -6- ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on . Mayor' s action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. OF 1990 Published: . RLM:rc -7- 0 r‘cLin k?)*7 V--Cir 41 L_N., 1) 1)%.(P. : )1'(•PA."-4-rz-v(-- kciii-, .. - Al.,1) oki eitc,Ch- , ic AAA_ C.6S- '-- C -'2- (A3LA4 C1-- 1 OL k (-- I .- P-r- kk L" 1,t(,A.- -k. 0.11.i1J - k' kf\J-L-rk VV .1.c)Pil -5 4,Oc,f / 2-tic-AiL )\11a4„,i7c,__,, uJiA-- irl-in ,ca-,tw•v\it,J , ,, 3).AA-- Waco,. . 4-\_0 V - Ut E . rf\a,kwf‘d-U4-01INCA.., --- % c C CZ ,,kv_.. R( a - iv.,IL NIfi ,i 11' .,:trr"1-• - kt. ,,S, r-coi- - •CPY‘ctt,,t,k, 1\) P Icv-Ne-- . _ s k - cjyt,k; - Ir '9,0Lcil_. 6Co_craA-, -- , . , bc,..rci ,_ ukkiLtAv - /30F5 rl 1/4,6L ex,c,v _ - ca4)—L---- -E-fr i5t')j5 Cki -,1— w•JJL \-?"4:, , — 6 1 - - .1- Cam-- `W► J,. R L 2_49 t‘ P.0)-4, co b/L.,c),(- 6- it G 2 0r s £a VA,>\,0tt0U i--. --f1304. e\ P3 P caNr,tA-- c) c cflvToluu ck,u0t. 0 v ivtacLotatt ucizAk — ckre/),\J` ikouve, — -aL lC � 14. D.)-% r,A--, c _mot C c t- h. 4pL ,vA)-.‘ c1-60 �. ViVN rr-___.. 4-4,-- Pt_ P t W - i Z rL - t, s‘ - (-1,04 mAQt -- l Z iron- n - p . &rIr- ()let= Me.L'tjj XA,W.__;;V -A. -,6:01's 7--Z-q 0 10' Fs cam- d� �v fir" Ni o - c-- CV-elilk f),Cji cL IV 1 I-Uwe' a “0 us" 444,•(-Ati AAA z S QJ wl eiru,, n - Ciic\ )\6to ?fr )2L-- - cum .vatm-fr Jud4-LA - a_ tit, .-kAv PO; v s(1h4/k-/ ' ije° 11111111, • UTAH HOTEL MOTEL ASSOCIATION #9 Exchange Place—Suite#715 Salt Lake City,Utah 84111 June 5 , 1990 Telephone(801)359-0104 Dear members of the Salt Lake City Council : This letter is in response to recent discussions of raising city room taxes . The Utah Hotel Motel Association membership is made up of various size properties throughout the state . Hotels , motels , bed & breakfasts , resort and convention properties show the diversity of our 200 member organization . There is one concern we all share : the trend to increase room taxes for a variety of reasons . Many individuals believe that increasing room tax does not hurt business . However , a recent study (April 1990 ) conducted by Purdue University shows that increasing the overall price of a room does have a negative impact on the number of rooms rented . The study shows that a room tax of 9 . 8 percent would be restrict room sales by about 3 . 5 percent , on the average . Therefore , the theory that room taxes do not negatively impact tourism and convention business is false . Secondly, many people believe Utah is among the lowest in room taxes charged. As is also stated in the Purdue University report , the U .S .average total tax on room rentals is 9 . 8 percent . Therefore , Salt Lake City' s tax of 10 . 34 percent is above the national norm. Some people may say , "Why should Salt Lake City residents suffer under triple taxation?" In all honesty, the Utah Hotel Motel Association must ask the same question , "Why should our guests be subjected to triple taxation through sales tax , city room taxes , and county room taxes?" . In the last twenty years , the lodging industry has invested in tourism. . . no other industry that benefits from tourism has done so . In reviewing the options for Salt Palace funding we ask you to consider all possibilities and remember all those who benefit from tourism and conventions . Sincerely, rr , -/ Gar' „, Jie Peck Executive Director AFFILIATED WITH it AMERICAN HOTEL& MOTEL ASSOCIATION