The URL can be used to link to this page

03/01/2011 - Work Session - Minutes PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 2011 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in a Work Session on Tuesday, March 1, 2011, at 3 : 00 p.m. in Room 326, City Council Office, City County Building, 451 South State Street. In Attendance: Council Members Carlton Christensen, Van Turner, Stan Penfold, Luke Garrott, Jill Remington Love, JT Martin and Soren Simonsen. Also in Attendance: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director; Jennifer Bruno, Council Deputy Director; Russ Weeks, Council Policy Analyst; Tim Brown, Tracy Aviary Executive Director; Paul Svendsen, Friends of the Aviary Consultant; Rick Graham, Director of Public Services; John Naser, City Engineer; Frank Gray, Director of Community and Economic Development; Nick Tarbet, Council Policy Analyst; Lex Traughber, Senior Planner; Noel Walkingshaw, Planning Programs Supervisor; Daunte Rushton, Planning Intern; David Terry, Golf Enterprise Manager; Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney; and Chris Meeker, City Recorder. Councilmember Love presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 3 : 00 p.m. AGENDA ITEMS #1. 3 : 10 : 03 PM REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INCLUDING A REVIEW OF COUNCIL INFORMATION ITEMS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. View Attachments See File M 11-5 for announcements . #2 . 3 : 15 :49 PM RECEIVE A REPORT FROM TIM BROWN, TRACY AVIARY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, REGARDING NEW EXHIBITS CONSTRUCTED IN 2010 AND AN INTRODUCTION OF 2011 PROJECTS. View Attachment Tim Brown and Paul Svendsen briefed the Council with the attached handout and a slide show. Mr. Brown said the Aviary had earned its accreditation from the Association of Zoos and Aquariums . Mr. Brown said 112 trees had been planted at the Aviary after removal of 66 old trees. He said because of the oil spill attendance was down. Mr. Brown asked the Council for full support for the coming years . #3 .3 :48 : 39 PM RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL OF A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH AND SALT LAKE 11 - 1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 2011 CITY CORPORATION RELATING TO CERTAIN TRACY AVIARY BONDS OF SLAT LAKE COUNTY. View Attachments Rick Graham and Jennifer Bruno briefed the Council with the attached handouts . Ms. Bruno said the amendment would allow Capital improvements to move forward. #4. 3 : 50 : 50 PM RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING AN ORDINANCE TO UPDATE AND PROVIDE CLARITY TO THE CITY'S ZONING REGULATION. RELATED PROVISION OF TITLE 21A - ZONING - MAY ALSO BE AMENDED AS PART OF THE PETITION. THE PROPOSED CHANGES INCLUDE: View Attachments Nick Tarbet, Lex Traughber, Paul Nielson and Nick Norris briefed the Council with the attached handout. • 3 : 51 : 44 PM ALLOWING AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN THE SIDE YARD BEHIND THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. Mr. Traughber said this clarified where an accessory structure could be located behind the rear plain of the principal structure of the lot . • 3 : 53 : 45 PM REMOVING THE PROPER NAMES "DELTA CENTER" AND "FRANKLIN QUEST BASEBALL STADIUM" FROM THE SIGNS REGULATION AND ADDING THE TERMS "SPORTS ARENA", SPORTS STADIUM" AND THE ADDRESS OF THE FACILITIES. • Councilmember Garrott wanted to know why the Ball Park wasn' t called the Ball Park instead of Sports Stadium. All Council Members were in favor of the name Ball Park. • 3 : 55 : 30 PM REARRANGING EXISTING LANGUAGE FOR FRATERNITIES AND SORORITIES. Mr. Nielson said the concern with existing language was that IT should have included affiliation with a national chapter. Councilmember Penfold said the language would specifically exclude an alternate use for a structure. He said the Planning Commission recommended further study. All Council Members were in favor of further study. • 4 : 09 : 25 PM PROVIDING A DEFINITION FOR A PITCHED ROOF. • 4 : 10 : 10 PM REMOVING THE OUTDATED SUMMARY OF YARD AREA AND SIZE REQUIREMENT FOR THE ZONING DISTRICTS. 11 - 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 2011 PETITION PLNPCM2010-00064 - MAYOR RALPH BECKER (ZONING CODE MAINTENANCE) . #5. 4 : 11 : 27 PM RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1260, 1274, 1282, 1292 AND 1306 NORTH REDWOOD ROAD FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1/7, 000) TO OPEN SPACE (OS) . PETITIONER - MAYOR RALPH BECKER (ROSE PARK GOLF COURSE DRIVING RANGE EXPANSION) , PETITION NO. PLNPCM2010-00328. View Attachments Nick Tarbet, Noel Walkingshaw, Daunte Rushton and David Terry briefed the Council with attached handouts . Mr. Tarbet said the Rose Park Community Council had been briefed on March 11 and April 7, 2011 concerning the sale of the property and with a favorable feedback. #6. 4 : 16 : 46 PM RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND THE UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1300 SOUTH VIADUCT REHABILITATION) . View Attachments Jennifer Bruno, John Naser and Frank Gray briefed the Council with the attached handout . Mr. Naser said the project was a major rehabilitation. He said it would cost $20 million to totally rebuild the bridge and the Federal Highway Administration had given $9 .4 million. He said they would look for more sources of funding. Councilmember Love asked for a list of options . #7 . 4 : 37 : 14 PM RECEIVE A FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING REGARDING BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 3 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011. View Attachments Jennifer Bruno, Cory Lyman and Cindy Gust-Jenson briefed the Council with the attached handout . Council Members Christensen and Turner asked for CERT funding. All Council Members were in favor of CERT funding. #8. RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING THE LIST OF LEGISLATIVE ISSUES FOR THE 2011 LEGISLATIVE SESSION. This issue was removed. #9 . 6 : 08 : 19 PM INTERVIEW DRU WHITLOCK PRIOR CONSIDERATION OF HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADVISORY BOARD. Councilmember Love said Mr. Whitlock' s name would be forwarded to the Consent Agenda for approval. 11 - 3 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 2011 #10. 6 : 14 : 04 PM INTERVIEW JUDITH LOCKE PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HER APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. Councilmember Love said Ms Locke' s name would be forwarded to the Consent Agenda for approval . #11. 5 : 41 :44 PM DISCUSS PRIORITIES FOR 2011 AS A FOLLOW-UP TO THE RETREAT. View Attachments Russ Weeks and Frank Gray briefed the Council with the attached handout. Mr. Weeks said between 400 and 600 street lights needed to be repaired at approximately $125 per light. #12 . 4 : 43 : 26 PM CONSIDER A MOTION TO ENTER INTO CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE § 52-4-204, FOR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES: (a) A STRATEGY SESSION TO DISCUSS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE §54-2-205 (1) (B) ; (b) A STRATEGY SESSION TO DISCUSS THE PURCHASE, EXCHANGE, OR LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY (INCLUDING ANY FORM OF WATER SHARES) WHEN PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF THE TRANSACTION WOULD DISCLOSE THE APPRAISAL OR ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION OR PREVENT THE CITY FROM COMPLETING THE TRANSACTION ON THE BEST POSSIBLE TERMS PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE §52-4-205 (1) (C) ; (c) A STRATEGY SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING OR REASONABLY IMMINENT LITIGATION PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE § 52-4-205 (1) (c) ; (d) A STRATEGY SESSION TO DISCUSS THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (INCLUDING ANY FORM OF WATER RIGHT OR WATER SHARES) IF (1) PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF THE TRANSACTION WOULD DISCLOSE THE APPRAISAL OR ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION OR PREVENT THE CITY FROM COMPLETING THE TRANSACTION UNDER THE BEST POSSIBLE TERMS, (2) THE CITY PREVIOUSLY GAVE NOTICE THAT THE PROPERTY WOULD BE OFFERED FOR SALE, AND (3) THE TERMS OF THE SALE ARE PUBLICLY DISCLOSED BEFORE THE CITY APPROVES THE SALE; (e) FOR ATTORNEY-CLIENT MATTERS THAT ARE PRIVILEGED PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE § 78B-1-137; AND (f) A STRATEGY FOR ATTORNEY-CLIENT MATTERS THAT ARE PRIVILEGED PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE §78B-1-137 . 11 - 4 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 2011 Councilmember Garrott moved and Councilmember Simonsen seconded to go into Closed Session, a roll call vote was taken, which all members voted aye. The meeting adjourned at 6 : 17 p.m. 1 �� 1. (i � 'CF C1T��+ cil ChairVrG��4, '-ty ecorde OkApR This document along with the digital recording constitute the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held March 1, 2011 . cm 11 - 5 RALPH BECKER S2 I ,Offel� ��1!�Q! RECEIVED,r OFFICE OF THE MAYOR J,.t M 10 2011 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL SLC COUNCIL OFF10E Date Received: j i David E eritt, Chief of taff Date sent to Council: TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 10, 2011 Jill Remington Love, Chair FROM: David Everitt, Chief of Staff SUBJECT: State of Tracy Aviary Report STAFF CONTACT: David Everitt, Chief of Staff Ext. 7732 Tim Brown, Tracy Aviary Executive Director (801)596-8500 Ext. 120 DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The purpose of this briefing is to provide a report of new exhibits constructed in 2010 and to offer a preview of 2011 projects. 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 306 P.O.BOX 145474,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5474 TELEPHONE:801-535-7704 FAX:801-535-6331 www.slcgov.com :► a«,��Eo.,,PEa A World of Birds in Utah TracyAviary To: Salt Lake City Council From: Tim Brown,Tracy Aviary executive director Subject: State of Tracy Aviary Date: January,2011 In November 2008 a majority of Salt Lake County residents approved a$19.6 million bond to revitalize Tracy Aviary. Because Salt Lake City owns the property,buildings and birds at Tracy Aviary,the status of these Salt Lake City assets is of great importance to all involved with making this city such a wonderful place to live.The purpose of this ten minute presentation is to provide a report of new exhibits constructed in 2010 and to offer a preview of 2011 projects. Tracy Aviary :: 589 East 1300 South :: Salt Lake City,Utah 84105 :: 801-596-8500 :: www.tracyaviary.org State of Tracy Aviary Report Salt Lake City Council January, 2011 2009 — 2010 Accomplishments • New Southern Ground Hornbill Exhibit • . Renovated South American Pavilion • New Seriema Exhibit • New holding/quarantine facility • Accreditation from Association of Zoos and Aquariums a c ) � 0 1. �' r.� y , ti a . , 1 4. ;il f .`y• . _.,..A ..gr , it --• • • ,Art•i4 , 11—' 1. �. : t , 0 X . . > r t r a i . .6, , tiT f " `f. >. rr �� "' -.. ' v r " 1:1 41:. 0 •um rt•42...,.... ,,A.1 ., s. -0r 1 Irl ��'y �S'. ,4 .-�r � ly Fly Y b ‘ '' ' . ,,‘ s, %Pr (I19 • , 4::., ,. ..,,, ,,,.... .,:-. / /- i• 4„ , . .,,,,.. ..4:.:'..t...i.J.:::1, : • 101,1, -`' , fit t,,, ., .,, ?�, ..� c' n- c iT< ` • 0 4 ,i1r, • Z S , • liet i h i • r i e1 \ , •4 ' t • '1 r 11!• . R lam, ` fe_' Renovated South American Pavilion _._ _ . ...... , ,. , ._. I IIISIS• .S..:' . , ii:I'' '''I''''..--- i''...4 --'` •' . A-IS.. '-,.: '. - .... • - ,.1 . ,*•,-,k,' ,,.,„t,I ,,.. . zt _ „te 1 - . - - - . • . . . *_....-...,•.--...---1..,, , „:„...,4,.....:4, ....T. ,-..- , . • : .4. 1 , 7 , . t. 0:9` - — _ : : '' 1'' •Aillient'4' ..._. , ."\;-•',.7-':4 t•_, ,I. • * 2 tlii...tvihtto.,..)miligLiaiiii'6.7'43,,,,‘,.,14:;;•::: . •-•,•t-. '- _,,; .,,, ,. , .• 4.,, 04 :c.,.,,...,...i...:)......,,... :: , , %.":•-•:7-'1.i...e.: , •.t• ,..,, - .,, • , 1 ......., . i e....41F1 •-°I. -. $)11 ' A Atclit .1 'ik 4. 7,.. .-.* \.,, ,,,, _ r , '• 1 il--- . — , . ... . • • .... , a, . - - ' • 7.- - - .t, ' .„ , ‘, .. . , • ••••••;- ,, z., z• „ ,. i , ,. . -,4.,pt, 7,...aii.;. 1 140111. 11... lim Affilliti r • •S 1 ...me . • "•'.c;..4144LIMV ,., .. , .. ..0". Si ' :2 ,,s . C,t44•F.Cit ' . ) , - — -- ,4(.1"410., '=". . ••• . - -""".1.111. ....k.s . , ...,•-a4I.."°•7;•"11,ISIOt • . ----=?-i..,: li'ii -...,--... , c/lie•!.....,„„, . 11111 --7 1,....'r- "! *•' - — 4:4,4.-!.1.1,, '- ---' ,-4441TAPIr : . . \.'.-..."•:•:: :: •- .- • . • 1. .•• . it,. 1 • t.„„:,,, .. , • --,,v1.0, ,. vg.Arifflt.,, pr_ ,„;-....... ,.. . , t,..,.... , _ -.),i .i „••`.. I.' I'‘ . ..--403011c.., 4' t.,tre NS ._ •posh *ifts.. ;-S...::411•P ' . .. ' . ..: • 0 / • . . . 6 . . . . , 4, , ••• .. a) \ .. . • . , .,. .,,,(,„,.,...1 ,,,, .. ,. .0.. . _ . . „.,,.. ., - , of, '''IT..- ''' 1 " ' • ''''..::-t.:',.:''''''t,'./4 7;‘ ,1_'':' , Lae \''' at l'',..S'' ' .- ' ; ' .;:., '1.; ,.,:i:'::','•;1! ..r,ei', ' 6 I f" ,..I • , ,1 ,,,. ,:i-_-,;,t,.t.,,..,-,-,.. • , 1/2'' '': " • r r 1 4—, ,,: : --, .", • , • ••-:.. . 1 - (1111) • A ' • ' - • k ..,,,,e: ,...,: !• . •: tik..4"., : . i , .; '',t....V. :7 .,. = A• • .,4 -, , 1.,';:'' .-. -. ,,,,,\..,,,,,, „.„..,..,...'ig ,I.0..t . ,..i.,:17-.' .i';1,...„f . 1 iv• ..:.,.,...--, .,,A",,' ' '40 1 IL •• •<iit , -,' Sh. - 1 ,' 5 .^1,, •4:c/ ••;, ' ..ii •-. ...,...,1, .::' ''' 4•I,'''.;11,-1.' , •imi \ ' ..V, i,Z411-, .---..-,'-' {. .7,.., ... ,i ',..., t 1-,t :' . ') y, 4 4i,, V) .. , , I I --,.. _ ••:t '?7.; '. a) v. - . .,,k,,,,..„..,5.:, ....../.. .,.... ., ,• ..: ,- . „. ,. .._ t. ... , 1 1'1 I 0. . .,1k• •mom, .:,,.444 -,..,..' i . ,,.,. :.: i.: : • 1. •.1 ., C i ,,`'t.,.,..'ti 1..•iiituramesormii•ai4 \'‘ 7; 4: . .rf..1.•,:i.,.;,;;;41 liNi': ,7,' ' .t '- • !' ' r, rE3 1 .. ,., .t . . II oil :),..0 :3ft!.14,1..,,I. - ,1 • ., , .,., •:1 O 1. , ,.. i-•., ,•:•-: ,, ,-.17,..n-,-te...` : .4.. , • . ., / .1' tr:44.lm, 1 lioiv,...„...:,A„.. --.-. .4 : , • '; i ..1,,,,. l• , 4 •I .•..0 :.., = ,:-.041°' fit 4P..i, ..-1' ...:•,...,..,,,,.,,., ,, ,,,, 7 _...., CT 4 ..' i , kpA . ''' AI 't‘•- ‘3.' . r.:., ' .., f'' •'''. . .t. t, •, "111111110004044 i -. • . -'-. .7-,,, . •,I tin ' .: vithillitilrao.. . '-'' - -----'--- ' • , 1, ,: •• ; .,. . .... -.,:•,---IT-- ,,, • r 1 ,4,. - , ,. ,•i, ......:.-..: „1 lc, .r.t .,,' ',.t.-,',1 C .,.„-,i.-:;...::.--f. -*":"....., ,,-i• ,,.4 ; ..,..t ;----,1,4-, .s. #:•-.114, . ..0 ,... . .•"',. , . -:......,--.41,-6. • .., .4,-,..;;.-...-. 4, ' ... ,..-., r' •immos ,,•:,..,:1411; •,..•,k.•-•;:i!,,'.,. i . • -'..1 10 *i:/' ,.•. 0 ,' . . ' • ..,, . t ,. 4 . I .' _ . . , • . / , ,- . ;;,;,..,..,. !. . ,...4,.:..,.- .ri. , P ''ic.-. t .. l'-'' t. ‘, , # •.. :f,...., • 1.;. ..,,,,,tc? , yi , . ,t.:`'r.t all) .re:.'''‘''''''..V-- ',1''''. ''-1-•' .'• • ' '.;' . .';',..i'l'. .1* ' 'i '.; ,'•,, • 4-0.1rItolial ,4•' Z ' ' i V f,,,i rt .'.7.-:f , _.-.. .;i`': 1 . , - ,,_'11'.','''. ‘:.•'Mat,V.'lilorilli I.' • • ii'l ! 7',- '1; '''-' " '-7/ 4.,' . . l'' '''''' . 'Y-''t -). ':,..... .1'...,.:- '-- .. - " . , ... . , . • I ' c- -.n cril--1 (c _ TracyAviary C L. - Ir (iiiiiiii axligi 11 <, t-004,-2 s', '',. �) 4 ,,- ..,, ..,,..,,,,..:,- . .„ \, ,_,, ,,._,, -_ ,..._,. . ,,,,- , ,, ,,, , .„. ..,._, •(, . . . .. . . i , „. . ., .„..,,, 40 • „., 7 , "...-,,, 4 .%, --:,'"-';-4 •'�µ- r r- .r- J.1 : ''.4.. ; Z: •,.'$ „., ,j/ c - . ,I4.:,.. •.;,\,, , '..\ •..'*.; F 'S(7 4...)if• ' . A. t J M ft , do-? ? O O i � {� t � ' 1 } ,t k t_ ...- :_,_ } 1. 1� I r .- ,� ....,.--r • ED , s ,..,,,, , ,,,_,, fl.;•:i.!....S.. . .4.z. -;.• 10 -4, iffro. -. ..z . . - - 1-. 'Pk 1 (....„.° ' km_.46,— 111.-.!-,.--•,- . • .7•:' — 1 ' , 0 10 26 60 100 k+ `a '� :r'-: g ' J,, 1:0_4Irt+.� 'z,wiE: '11'r r," _ !fir L' \i�`�i["3�Y� � `� �. Legend (1 Andy's Rest Home Possible Future Vending/ Bathrooms Exhibit, 5 Year Build Out r2 Reconfigured Pelican Pond Vet Clinic/ Office $ Site Feature. %Year Build Out r3 Possible Bird Exhibit/ Feature Possible New 1,000 sf Holding Building • Future Guest& Employee Services r4 Turkey Vultures& Hawks New Office Building Scope of Phase 2 Build Out (5 North American Teaching Stream New Guest Services Building r6 Future Owl Forest Exhibit Future Exhibit 1 r7 Future Mexico Panama Exhibit, Future Conservation Zone 5,OOOsf Interior. 4 5,000 Exterior Exhibit Future Discovery Play 5-12 Years (8 Future Bird Show& Bird Show Holding Future Discovery Play 2-5 Years c9 New Sand Hill Cranes Exhibit Tracy Aviary Master Plan - 1 Off 43043 Legend t Exhibit. 5 Year Build Out LARCHITECTS, INC. a Site Feature.5 Year Build Out 327 EAST BROADWAY SIC.UT 84 v 1 1 8131,322,2724 Future Guest and Employee Services rf.: Scope of Phase 2 Build Out ., - .34 to tit W4 ' 'K i.) .,A ,,:,� 11?^ ft t° x`e-ca rri, .car 400. - .„,, i.tat,-'...1.040; ,.v. -'7-----, --I- qd,i, v.%AR"* - - :tele 11,;,. 41. ..tili ' , er'' ,.rt...- :, .44. ' iw: 9 ) .. 4 lillitk, Fey r +dar. t ,, 4.� ' �, �,'"t:.,-- _ s .?fa.....µ1r� it rAy .04Niti.4.:.,?-r?::, y ,, T � _4 -44 7JtfaS7 tt ''e' �'h' I 1 - ! • t ♦ ^ 44 a q*J r �A° t t' P ;4 \ ) ->'c{.s-" a y� N. ' •`` t 7g .,,1�� , 1,.. v - �" ,;a,, . Iiii '',• ' Alt ':'' / a (s& VW"--. ' ' -Ar :lel .0 ,- - 1 ,.....,.,,..,, .„v-4,,,..! ........! , ,z,e 'RV. ."0.' 4 ' 01_,01,.... t Via f/f� ti r ,I �. , �rIST ,0 fj �f a�'' • n(.J��J ,� Y 6 .: — s ice. 709.1., y 1/ - •'K , .Ai --btiff/I It i...,-.),-.::%Jai-- 14 "'I : .6 1 . lex" . i _ , „,(4,41, ,,,„,.., 10 ... ,•. . . si .. iir,t;ji,.,....f. ...0 via, . ... 0 _ ‘4, .,,, - .. ,,•,-,,,,- , - -- ...7 •• 't• \* - , tilit41.4.ig..'N.4.L Ilia , p P i_ l ii !7 rqi '� • ] Imo.,;, .1";--T>`- `i;-- \ f} •( t'-'_r j,,'� ttti• TT r_ 4:,47' /' �``t j,• i f�, Fv�' ti 2 ��: �" 1 I „viraiii. 1 -,7 fst r . r_p,,,, fit ,` `y a i�ft + E ;'A Ian s der, rI t+t -.. t 7- ��-.A_. -__ _-- � (1 Andy's Rest Home Possible Future Vending/ Bathrooms r2 Reconfigured Pelican Pond Vet Clinic/Office Trac Aviary ( Possible Bird Exhibit/ Feature Possible New 1,000 sf Holding Building (4 Turkey Vultures& Hawks New Office Building r5 North American Teaching Stream New Guest Services Building (6 Future Owl Forest Exhibit Future Exhibit QES (7 Future Mexico Panama Exhibit, Future Conservation Zone 0 5,000sf Interior,4-5,000 Exterior Exhibit Future Discovery Play 5-12 Years (8 Future Bird Show& Bird Show Holding Future Discovery Play 2-5 Years (9 New Sand Hill Cranes Exhibit Tracy Aviary Master Plan ' Phase 2 Dra r or 6..:, . _ er , 17 \ `�• ! / _ . .... , ,....„. ,. ... ... t .. _ ,,,,,, „,„ , ,,,_._+,. . t All '4 1:11 .....,. :.IA );i4.,. ._ / , 3„, .... , ,........ . .., - \ / .._.,..„..\A--,, 4..,/,,p7- t.... • A,# l It rF,. t I. ,mac -•� i ri TH 1 ` 1 ~ 1. - f r • a) • i 1 \ ,,, - 4 ., L--OE t , . ''"-4411kiv,..:401111frp, 0(-1 111 ,., : 1 0 (T) kit; W , 1 ttia----r. , ..„ , ..,.: ..::: . , - k ....,4 .... '.4„,,,,,.,_„„.„... , \ .._..,,, „i„... : . .„. ...... .,..., . . ".. ,•.11 �'" c j. j ,•?'ram: t t ` ... ,,,01, g. --. ,,.... • ...-_..„ ,,_ ...„ ). - - 4-- . . 1-,, _ ,_ ,- , _ ...__...... , . . ,' , ./.., `1,i-•-,,,:.:' 4 *L." �` � ' 'I , , . . , - y, 4ti, .c 'a`�t .-I �\-, `, ..... ..„.....A.4 . , ----N. ,A ,,N < tlfr -4.": 11 • , ,,„ „ , ci ` :` : _ • \ \ _ . oi MI a F 1 _�" `• i ` < .....?.. .. a '''''l .-.--.~ 4- ' %t• ; - P 0 t• .1-----i;:-. • ..„ „4,•,,,,.•.,;,•, i• . ' A .,._ • . , . • .:, _ ..;, .. - li MI .... . , .. . col ... A.. -...A.,1,41::.A•/ff.,1„4,,,,- '.....0.. -..7.- - :L , ii., n‘,. -,..,.... .- • , r" 11011Nr yq*,_ riipt - tr..., -',,•,.1L ,W-..,.,,,:,, ',..le•...7,ii-r,.,, ...--,. _,.., yolif..s.7.ig.f, -: ,....., -,..,-‘,.,..-. .101..-,-;,,.., Aill ___•,--.... _ ••, _ ....f. .Wit:.,,i,..7.74.:.:Fls*:. — , -- ---z-fiv.i7,.-R:1, --imi,--gtim ....,..., .- . .. , ... ...?„, ..,..4- .. ., .. ,r-.. .i''.10,6it'• Pk, ,.',' I, .:, • ,..,7.rifroc. _ ..a.1 2• . ...) - .;',01 .• -1'-=---- 4 SX'AM-Z..,". mews, ... t . 3134:. 4.7' ' 14t--'---- ir— - . . -, ,f, T '. ! • 1 •,44-, t ... - A •,•• ' • ''-'- - - '"'"' • ' .,••••..s.,'".--.;-.-..r' 4'; . -. ., . . ...,._ . -- --,e, . .-7----__; ,g- ,-_-_, :.- --i„.,...-- - . -....,-, ;-i- -,-•-f------- . . _ .,.,.,_ . 2 • ,- - '' - , ' . V? 11,, • ' • . , ..• , .,- f•••14 ,- • ' -4:‘, IP'. • .......„: • 144. L , - . ,,-i". '''•I- ,• ., . -,.. -,-:on,,t- , - •e' . "' ' .2 _••4 '`.'''''' e.. , , • ' . , 4- ••• ' r . • .• • '' '74- "' ‘-` - ''' +i ' ' .-_. -....- .•,.-i...;,i_ 1,4.-I.;-,-i-- ' -tr.-.•...- .-- •-_, - ',...--.• -- 4 a- ..,0 •• q t 1 ' 44 r„IP(•••••tr/I ' at: ' , - - - - '.,4,,, •••--, " ' - *7-;.,1P- ---"At— -I' r•1•241944 4 , ' • * - _ ...'..,.. • --..`41IPP• - . - --':- . - - .* •-77-..:.iz.. A.., f --,-• Ilib= . •ok'7. , ' . , - - • -•,' •'4•141 -till-#%.,da.•• , -..,,.• . • 'i'141:11.114a- , , ' r -:, ...---,,k.,---,r,-„,„- -_„-Pipp. ----..v.-- ' '''' -... .t-A- 7!`„.'„,-..--4,-.---."--. --•",t ', - ,.. r\llar, --111-:LL--•• 04,•• .- .. _ . '. ,• , , - _ . , .?-- Building and landscape weave through existing and new trees, and water The .. •. I i _ building form embraces plazas and opens f . 1 4 ‘ , opportunities for views and relationships between park, building and aviary. . • -,- k • ... . .., Irlok..1,my I • . . Oft 1131G-D Izzi___ •, 1 tomornm. 11 1, 41..t. .... I TracyAviary ( The patterned facade embodies both the OFFICE �nimna Cif/ function and aesthetic r ='f of the trees - canopies and branches, shade and OFFICE structure - and hopes `'F,C. OFFICE Ji to immerse visitors and employees alike in ailtr RR ill "En+ UPPER LEVEL memorable experience that changes with the 1StSKY EL sun and the seasons. COURT rt 1f CONE. ill ORK facade and building r PROJ form combine to draw p attention to nature and kim upwards, to sky and 10-EI to flight. Illl�rr 1111C,11UU FREESTANDING SIGN MATCHES FACADE ` IN SCALE AND PATTERN,FRAMING THE }'a •- CONNECTION BETWEEN AVIARY ENTRY PLAZA FROM WEST AND NORTH --,. AND PARK CONCESSION AREA 'tea LANDSCAPING AND FENCING ri? C `N� . .-• "EXTEND"ENTRY • v . x t Y PLAZA DESIGN 1n �Lh b1 1.�n>' ifaiRPORATES SERVICE EXPERIENCE TO WEST t 4 L" - ?:,::. ';1��.L�,�� C $5 AS PART OF PLAZA a ` � 114,::::...::1,,,zi:;?aci,:t.,--....i:',f,:' . PAVERS Z70R. 011- i�Q ..a.a r `- - ' 4 'i POND C tis >. NATURE BOARDWALK S'yt ON BETWEEN ENTRY ri MT PICNIC AREA I iyi.:4-..--:11.1."._:::.,,i4:7:::;.,1 AlaiNliaU,tiTl'R ii - ',:• -:-QN BETWEEN ION PLAZA, ' ,_M+PICNIC AREA _— r ,,„„ ,0 _ , _ ... 1. •...:,,...... „. o„ .. ,..... * _ . t...._ Atope„... . _ . .. _ , ,E.:. ._ ...:_„- - ..;_ -, -- -„,,.,_. ,,."7'•-A..' • V ' •- C TA••CKIf� .I o �,,,. ,. To: Salt Lake City Historic Landmarks Commission From: Paul Svendsen,Friends of Tracy Aviary Consultant&Owner's Representative Date: January 14,2011 Re: Future Tracy Aviary Construction&the Impact on Trees This memorandum addresses two issues arising out of current and future construction at Tracy Aviary. First,Friends of Tracy Aviary(FOTA)requests permission to immediately remove seven trees as part of its utility upgrades,which are underway now. Second,FOTA requests permission to remove 25 trees at a later date that will be impacted by future large-scale improvements within the Aviary. I.Background Information Tracy Aviary has many large trees. By FOTA's estimate,there are over 500 trees within the Aviary's boundary,with well over 300 having a six-inch caliper or greater. A substantial number of these trees are"volunteers,"meaning that they grew by chance rather than as part of a planned landscape design. Many if not most of the trees represent three common species:Box Elder,Elm,and Cottonwood. These trees are an important asset for the Aviary. They are beautiful,offer shade during the summer months,provide habitat for a variety of local birds,and contribute to the Aviary's oasis-like character. FOTA is committed to maintaining and enhancing these aspects of the Tracy Aviary experience. But the trees also pose significant management challenges that are easy to underestimate. Proper tree maintenance,especially in the case of large trees,requires significant expertise and is very costly, especially on a campus with such a large number of trees. Because the Aviary's circulation routes were not designed with tree pruning in mind,access for heavy equipment is generally difficult,disruptive,and in some cases impossible. Due to these and other factors,very few if any of the Aviary's large trees have received attention on a regular basis. As a result,a significant portion of the trees within the Aviary are in subpar condition. This is particularly true of the older trees. Safety of visitors,staff,and facilities at the Aviary is a constant and ongoing point of concern. In recent years there have been a number of major tree failures and alarming near-misses. Finally,there is widespread agreement that the Aviary needs to revitalize and grow in order to survive. This was the unmistakable message of the Aviary's 2008 bond proposition,which passed with nearly 80 percent support county-wide. The major construction projects funded by the bond include(1) renovation of the Wilson Pavilion(completed 2010);(2)infrastructure upgrades(currently underway); (3)new Education&Guest Services Building(construction to begin February 2011);(4)new bird show facilities(design RFQ published in December);and(5)major new bird exhibits,with sizable indoor and outdoor components(design RFQ published in December). For these and other construction projects,the Aviary has adopted the widely accepted industry standard practice of not constructing buildings within the dripline of trees. The purpose of this policy is twofold. First,it is designed to limit root damage so that remaining trees survive the construction process. Second,it is a common-sense means of protecting expensive new buildings from damage due to falling limbs and/or trees as a result of weather events,undetected defects,or simply old age. If a proposed building is located within the dripline of a tree,the tree is generally transplanted or removed. The Aviary has recently transplanted several trees and plans to transplant more. But for large 1 trees,transplanting is often not physically and/or financially feasible. Where removals are necessary, the Aviary's board of directors has adopted a formal policy requiring that whenever a tree of nine inch caliper or larger is removed,it must be replaced with at least three new trees elsewhere within the Aviary. II.Request for Permission to Remove Seven Trees Due to Future Bird Show Construction At its meeting on August 4,2010,the Historic Landmarks Commission approved FOTA's plan for a major overhaul of the Aviary's underground utilities. An element of that plan involved the use of directional drilling in several areas to avoid removing certain trees. In one area,FOTA believes it would be preferable to use the traditional open trench method of installation for its new utilities. This will necessitate the removal of two London Planes(numbers 27& 30);one Elm(number 26);two Cottonwoods(numbers 28&31);and two Box Elders(numbers 29&32). The reason for this request is that FOTA will soon be constructing a new bird show amphitheater and holding building that will require the removal of all these trees anyway. Architectural design of the new bird show facilities is expected to be complete later this year,and construction is expected to commence in 2012. These new facilities will replace the outdated and inadequate bird show facilities that currently occupy the east and north sides of the old swimming pool area. FOTA has considered using directional drilling in order to maintain the seven trees until bird show construction begins next year but believes this is an unwise use of taxpayer money. Directional drilling is an expensive process. Using this technique to permit the seven trees in question to stand for a few additional months would cost an extra$11,060 in bond funds. In view of the short-lived benefit,FOTA believes the most sensible course of action is to use the more cost-effective trenching technique and remove the seven trees now. Ill.Request for Permission to Remove 25 Trees Due to Future Exhibit and Plaza Construction As the new bird show facilities are being built,FOTA will also construct a major new exhibit with both indoor and outdoor components. The indoor portion will be one of the Aviary's hallmark attractions, featuring the stunning tropical birds and lush foliage of Panama. The exterior portion is likely to feature King Vultures and possibly a walk-through interactive experience. Together,these exhibits will be among the largest structures at the Aviary. The Aviary's working space estimate for these facilities is 9,000-10,000 square feet,although these estimates are subject to change during the programming and conceptual design processes. Because of the size of the structures and the existing sloping terrain, substantial site work,excavation and grading will likely be required. In addition,FOTA will build a new central plaza roughly where the abandoned swimming pool is located. Removing some or all of the old swimming pool structure and filling in the resulting hole will be an invasive process that is likely to disturb surrounding areas significantly. There are approximately 25 trees of varying sizes within the future exhibit&plaza area. FOTA is requesting permission to remove these trees(numbers 1-25)at a future date,likely 2012,so that construction of the new facilities can proceed. 2 miummirmier In FOTA's view, it is simply impossible to build the new exhibit and plaza facilities funded by the bond if the trees must remain. In the exhibit area,the necessary building area is sufficiently large that it will enter the dripline of virtually every tree in the area. This is true even if the most contorted design scenarios are considered. The same is true of the plaza area, where it will be necessary to remove the deep swimming pool walls that run under the trees and clear, re-grade, and compact the soil throughout the work site. In short, if FOTA is going to build the features endorsed by Salt Lake County voters in 2008, it needs substantial flexibility with respect to the trees in the affected area. IV. Conclusion No one at the Aviary relishes the idea of removing trees. But at this critical juncture in its history, the Aviary needs to grow in order to survive and flourish. And as the Aviary grows, a small portion of the old must make way for the new. This will benefit the Aviary not only in the short run but in the long run as well. Today, due to a long history of funding shortages and benign neglect,the Aviary has an unusually large proportion of trees that are closer to the end of life than the beginning. They will die, and when they do, the Aviary will be barren. By beginning the reforestation process now,our grandchildren will be able to enjoy a shady summer day at the Aviary just as we can today. The projects described in this memorandum are consistent with the master plan reviewed by the Historic Landmarks Commission in August of 2009. And they are arguably the most critical components of the package or improvements funded by the Aviary's 2008 bond. Not only as the Aviary's representative, but as a Salt Lake City resident, parent, and Aviary visitor since I was an infant, I urge you 1 to let the Aviary take these critical steps forward. • 3 e..0t-.T TWOS .,,....,.-....ova......... S TTOLNKTT' 31V0 •ONI '9103LHOSW M�Olitl1PML51x3 i0515A1YNV TICK MT 11.TT, 3L11'JNI3 I Oi 35YIkf AIMNV.3,411 1]3RINd 00000 C E I 4 b 5 k f i iii; ggggg gg§§ ;o$;gf gS n oavO ne!gg88ftt 88ghh �giiiIii E S b� E SE 5 4 S E SE S 4 9E 4 g $g g�g g S g 5 @@ 5 5 5 5 9 g 5 5# 5€& l Q€ 8Q€1 6 €Q s P pp€€ oe 5 ...,,.n....22227,2S74SP'RAAAAICR«ARAmm * \ _ ) 1 .,1 ____1 0 \' ._. ,....____,...____ q rity ..:, ,fflor.--,in . ;;;,_ ;:," ,-____, ,, ., , _ P AP — A-.) ) jilk ( a / > i._ • S _•�� .,„- ;T ` n )1 i r . :A • 1I1 ; 0 a U a tE 1 j • r) y. i 5 N A t El El �' 7- t > Imo'` Y ,,. , , ., . , •,...) , i , 6') \-- ' 6. 1 4 _ •1 71_ • )_ _1 • - 1 II, ,' MEMORANDUM DATE: February 23,2011 TO: City Council Members FROM: Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director RE: Interlocal Agreement for County ownership interest in capital improvements funded by the County GO Bond at the Tracy Aviary Attached is a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign an amendment to the interlocal agreement between Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County that allows the County to have an ownership interest in certain Tracy Aviary capital improvements funded by County- issued General Obligation Bonds. A. In September 2009,the Council approved an interlocal agreement with the County allowing the County ownership interest in$6 million worth of proposed improvements at the Tracy aviary,to be funded by a GO Bond approved by voters in 2008. This ownership interest(County 40%/City 60%)covered only the improvements funded by the bond,and only lasts the life of the bond (21 years). B. The total GO Bond authorized in 2008 was$19.3 million. C. The Aviary is now ready for another$10 million in improvements,and the County is ready to issue the bonds. However,before the County can issue the bonds,the City must amend the existing interlocal agreement and give the County ownership interest in these additional improvements for the life of the$10 million bond. D. The Aviary will be present at the Council's work session meeting on March 1 to give the Council an update about current and future projects scheduled to be paid for with these funds. POTENTIAL MOTIONS (FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION TONIGHT) 1. ["I move that the Council"] Adopt a resolution authorizing the Mayor approve the first amendment to the interlocal agreement with Salt Lake County,relating to the Tracy Aviary bonds of Salt Lake County. 2. ["I move that the Council"] Not adopt the attached resolution. The following information was provided on September 22, 2009 and is provided again for reference. KEY ELEMENTS A. In 2008 the Friends of the Tracy Aviary requested that Salt Lake County issue$19.3 million in general obligation bonds to finance certain large-scale capital projects at the Aviary. Voters approved this by a margin of 68%. B. In order to satisfy the statutory requirements of a general obligation bond,the County must acquire an ownership interest in the items funded by the bond. 1 C. Because the City is the owner of the Tracy Aviary and any capital improvements on Aviary property,an interlocal agreement must be executed giving the County a certain ownership interest in the capital improvements funded by the bond. D. The Aviary Master Plan(which will guide how bond proceeds are spent)was prepared with close participation by the Public Services Department. Note:This Master Plan has not been formally adopted through any City planning process. E. Terms of the Agreement: 1. The County will have a 40%ownership interest in only the improvements funded by the County-issued bond. The City will have a 60%ownership interest. 2. The County's ownership interest will run for the life of the bond and any refinancing,not to exceed 21 years. 3. At the termination of the County's ownership interest,the County will turn over any ownership interest to the City without any further consideration by the City. B. Bond proceeds will not be used to make all improvements identified in the Master Plan($1.5 million in matching funds are required to issue the last$6.1 million in bonds). Improvements identified to be funded with bond proceeds: 1. Renovation of Wilson Pavilion to include an indoor conservation pavilion; 2. Construct a new Mexico/Panama Rainforest Exhibit 3. Construct a new education program center; 4. Renovate existing bird show complex 5. Construct a new entry area that becomes a visible feature in the park,and ties to the concession and amusement ride area. BACKGROUND Salt Lake City is the owner of the Tracy Aviary and all of its physical assets(including birds). Salt Lake City has put the Friends of Tracy Aviary under a Land Lease and Management Agreement to operate and manage the facility. Prior to 1994 the City Managed the Facility. Note: Changes to the Interlocal Cooperation Act by the 2003 Legislature allow the Mayor to execute interlocal agreements without approval of the City Council except when the interlocal agreement includes any of the following: • Acquires or transfers real property • Construction of a facility or improvements to real property • Bonding • Sharing taxes or other revenue • Agreements that includes an out-of-state public agency • Agreements that require budget adjustments to the City's current or future budgets • Creation of an interlocal agency 2 �., nCLC1vCLJ FEB 1 7 2011 SLC COUNCIL OFFICE RICHARD GRAHAM ` WI ¢i 13141 RALPH oECKER ocAla Owuwo wswvv.9 oiw.cTow DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES DIRECTORS OFFICE CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL 11 Date Received: OZ n David eritt.C f of Staff Date sent to the Council: 9— TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 17,2011 Jill Remington-Love,Chair FROM: Rick Graham,Director Public Services Department SUBJECT: First Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County that allows the County to have an ownership interest in Tracy Aviary Capital Improvements funded by a County issued general obligation bond. 0 STAFF CONTACT: Rick Graham,Director 801-535-7774 Public Services Department Boyd Ferguson,Senior Attorney 801-535-7796 Tim Brown,Executive Director 801-596-8500 Friends of Tracy Aviary DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Resolution that authorizes the Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Salt Lake City owns Tracy Aviary and all its physical assets,including structures,exhibits and bird stock. Friends of Tracy Aviary manage and program the Aviary under a land lease and management agreement. In 2008,Friends of Tracy Aviary requested that Salt Lake County issue a general a,..pl�iga'. ..I. o finance renewal and revitalization capital projects at the Aviary. In j .- i i ...;tf tern approved the issuance of a$19.3 million bond. In order to satis its eon.o: - n the County must hold an ownership interest in the imprcFFehtat cilatitructed. The ownership interest will extend through the% f the �Vij']][JjVp(��1��ji� SALT LAKE of T�y `' Salt Lake t ft�IL�I�ORCMSTAT STREET,ROOM MALT,SAL CITY 11CIT CITY, UTAH 641 '�JNED B c TELEPHONE.BO1-3:-7773 Fhw SD1-533-T963 �" `�Ew.Q//$2O/"/ �, �y c.cuo.n bond. At that point in time,the County will convey its ownership right to the City • without additional consideration from the City. In September 2009,the City and County entered into an Interlocal Agreement which gave the County an ownership interest in approximately$6.0 million of Aviary capital improvements funded by the County bond. The projects funded by the$6.0 million will be completed by the summer of 2011. The Aviary has proposed its second phase of improvements and has asked the County for a second draw on the bond totaling$10.0 million(described in Exhibit A-1). Construction work will begin in the summer and will be completed by May,2014. The Administration supports the Capital Improvements recommended by Friends of Tracy Aviary. The First Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement will allow the projects(s)to move forward. The Administration supports the use of County bond funds to fund the Capital Improvements. It is unlikely that the City,even as the owner of the Aviary,would ever be able to make the capital investment equal to the County's without going to its residents for bond authorization. BUDGET IMPACT: None. All funds are County bond proceeds. PUBLIC PROCESS: Plans have been presented to community councils and appropriate City departments and commissions. O S RESOLUTION NO. OF 2011 Authorizing the approval of a first amendment to the interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake County, Utah and Salt Lake City Corporation relating to certain Tracy Aviary bonds of Salt Lake County WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13, Utah Code Ann., 1953, allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1. It does hereby approve the execution and delivery of the following: A first amendment to the September 28, 2009 interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake County, Utah and Salt Lake City Corporation, effective on the date it is executed by both parties, relating to certain Tracy Aviary bonds of Salt Lake County. 2. Ralph Becker, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah, or his designee, is hereby authorized to approve, execute, and deliver said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation, in substantially the same form as now before the City Council and attached hereto, subject to such minor changes as do not materially affect the rights and obligations of the City thereunder and as shall be approved by the Mayor, his execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2011. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By:_ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER O APPROVED AS TO FORM: SENIO CITY ATTO Y HB_ATTY-#16847-vl-Resolution_approving_interlocal_agreement_amendment_for Tracy_Aviary_bonds.DOC 2 • Salt Lake City Contract No.03-3-10-4101 County Contract No.WB09101 C FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND SALT LAKE COUNTY THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT("First Amendment")is made and entered into this_day of February,2011,by and between SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION,a municipal corporation of the State of Utah(the"City"),and SALT LAKE COUNTY,a body corporate and politic of the State of Utah(the"County"). RECITALS: OA. The Parties entered into that certain Interlocal Cooperation Agreement dated September 28, 2009, whereby the Parties agreed to the issuance of up to $19.6 million in general obligation bonds for the benefit of the Friends of Tracy Aviary, a nonprofit corporation(the"Aviary")to finance certain renewal and revitalization projects at the Aviary facility. B. Pursuant to the Agreement,the County issued bonds in the initial amount of$6 million and the Aviary made certain Improvements to the Aviary facility. C. As contemplated in the Agreement,the Parties have agreed to the issuance by the County of an additional $10 million in bonds for the construction of additional Improvements,and therefore desire to amend the Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW,THEREFORE,in exchange for valuable consideration,including without limitation,the mutual covenants,agreements and representations contained in this First Amendment,the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,the County and the City agree to amend and supplement the Agreement as follows: 1. Paragraph 1 of the Agreement is amended to include the following: O -raft. J 1. Project. The City acknowledges and agrees that the County ® has or will have an ownership interest in those improvements and projects proposed in the Aviary's renewal and revitalization project(the"Project"), more particularly described in Exhibit"A-1",and more specifically those improvements funded with the proceeds from the proposed general obligation bonds issuance("Improvements"). The ownership interest will be as a tenant in common with the City only as to the Improvements described in Exhibit A-1 to be made to the Aviary facility with the County's bond proceeds. The County's interest as a tenant in common will be 40%as to the Improvements and the City's interest as a tenant in common will be 60%as to the Improvements. Further,the City will act as the County's agent as to the County's tenancy in common interest and said tenancy in common between the City and County shall be for a term of years not to exceed the term of the bonds including any refinancing,but not to exceed 21 years after the final issuance pursuant to this Agreement and/or any amendment thereof. 2. Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is deleted and replaced as follows: 3. Duration and Termination. This Agreement and any subsequent amendment shall take effect upon execution by both Parties and shall terminate upon the later of(a)21 years from execution of this �+ Agreement,(b)21 years from execution of any amendment or(c)retirement E of the County's bond debt issued to finance or refinance the Improvements at the Aviary facility. 3. Paragraph 4 of the Agreement is deleted and replaced as follows: 4. Liability and Indemnification. Both parties are governmental entities under the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah, Utah Code Ann.§63G-7-101,et seq. Consistent with the terms of this Act,it is mutually agreed that each party is responsible and liable for its own wrongful or negligent acts which it commits or which are committed by its agents,officials,or employees. Neither party waives any defenses otherwise available under the Governmental Immunity Act. 4. Agreement in Effect. Except as specifically amended herein, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. • 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties have subscribed their names and seals the Oday and year first above written. SALT LAKE COUNTY By Mayor Peter Corroon or Designee STATE OF UTAH ) :ss County of Salt Lake) On this day of ,2011,personally appeared before me • ,who being by me duly sworn did say that(s)he is the of the Salt Lake County,Office of the Mayor, and that the foregoing instrument was signed on behalf of the Salt Lake County,by authority of law. [SEAL] NOTARY PUBLIC Residing in Salt Lake County,Utah SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION By MAYOR ATTEST: City Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Senior Salt Lake City Attorney Date • APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake County District Attomey's Office 3 By Ogloaney Date 2-17// Exhibit A-1 © Schedule of Capital Improvements Related to $10,000,000 Funds' (See also Aviary Phase 2 Master Plan2 and Property Description in the pages that follow) Construction Expenses for Capital Improvements Infrastructure (applicable to Phase 2 and other areas of the Aviary as needed) $1,500,000 Phase 2B $2,350,000 Phase 2C $3,800,000 Other Expenses for Capital Improvements Phase 2C Design (design charrette, programming, conceptual design, schematic design, design development, construction drawings, and construction administration work for Phase 2C) $1,000,000 CM/Owner's Rep. (5%fee (approx) of$8.65M amount) $450,000 Contract Admin. (10% pro-rated of$9M amount) $900,000 TOTAL $10,000,000 * The figures above represented budgeted, not actual, costs. 4840-3136-8200,v. 2 1 This schedule applies only to the$10,000,000 of funding generated by the second bond issuance; it does not apply to the entire Phase 2 capital improvement plan. When, and to the extent that, additional funding occurs, new schedules and other documents reflecting the planned expenditures for remaining capital improvements will be created. 2 The Phase 2 Master Plan is a preliminary rendering of the Aviary's planned capital improvements. The actual f locations,shapes, and sizes of the capital improvements shown on the master plan are anticipated to vary as further planning, design, and construction occur. 411.11111111114-.A- -' • ,-, .1 ir , - ..., c- .i- • ..-‘1. • .__ -.--..:-.. ,..-1.,-..,.._, :..7.--.7-.7-1-:.??,:-.".7 : -----' '-- .-.":r---- ' - "et-'-'-"--7:1';•••'.-F-'••-7-.• ---"-•-- ,41.-Ci' ..: -.-W.'...':•",:r- V.-:..-..-- 'i , 1'... 'el „I,: ‘f-J.,'• , ,.•rz.Zr7ij.--: 1,I--,-. -'f-'.." _- -',, 7=-:----.7:7,--"1,..,-;::%4 .-3.5,t1 f-' ' : .7.7 . -.,- .:-;-"-,-:',.7.--';'--;.:',:i -•------14--,.._-!-:7-1 -2:'''-.--: :-..--k*---1'7. '-'-.'--":-7-- : -'::, .:::..'.71..--....47-:-- -::,6-.7-,_k_.--.1,--..E'..c.,- -11.,;.-----,_-_,-----.1,---i--_. . -----'=- '''•-:i--..• '- '-÷...: - , -- .'.1:22. - -.•-••• '----:.L..-.;:f.,.i.-2.' . - "-- -L--51 1 ''-f'--: . - '•'..-i..'s7''_ '_. '•-4-- .'1..... .:..!.‘,..-., ,,..- --,- -.,.5 ..,„...,,,,,,,__ _._ _2,-;-.-1.-1 --.-_-,---,:_....!. ,-_--- '7.2---.7'-';- '-:-.7.47,74-f,:t- .. .-I---..'r.ilak..:,. '-•---.1-.--',1. ' 1 i -1 .r-- -- ^-.-; ---4.11',..';--, ----17 .-• '.?"-- - , 7 -_.-:.,: -------.::e'. . .. ---,--1,--.. - - .. . .- . . .. , . W. .-.-_,q.-:z. ,,,',----- - - ,i---4:= '•i'•'"" _.!!!!...!, -.. - -,..Z--11.,-, ----_-_._-- -'-' I 'It-•-•1•-7--.-"iat`-.-'" : - •: I -- -'' I kt.•-•,••_-..::::.--.7 ---.--• "'.'fil k 1-_,.:•;:::-F- , - ,_-- - •' -- --i-;----,- '_•L'---....._ --d , •- if -,:-.,-,-..i.1.-4-: ---:-F--1.4 ‘--t.-2'-- = '-'','"-- -:-F"-'•-• - , "-'"-: --.••,..-'-:-.=''•:%.?- --.:.',1,'.... 1-.",, 1 , I ' - 1••-.--- V- ,..t-'""'• "3 "...-".."" , r4g•--:&•"-K., .. •-.,../,."--`:--".:.:7-••••-:t-.':'-;, -÷---ifiAilik. •'‘,:"!'•'' ' : . • ::--44-` !-....:7.. . -" --.--• .. itk! ...-4.-)...."'":".•.-._-- i-ftil; -...P1 -:- ''''..- '. , '''.:.-."--:.:''.-fi&-:-..' 4.”.5:-..4;-1 _1=f:A= P•i---,-::k k, 1 . . . -' ._:.-&'...- ,----7,,--_a:_ti• ---"li,4F-- • ' • - rF:1-,, _..- _,J.:-: .- :: tr•-:' •"/- :,115))...P",'.:,.-:;-.4,14-,-.- -.., ----iv-„..t7.-ii•e,s:.• ii.; . , 'f•- • _ ---.,,-.....___-,1:- ii,--.:. F, -,---,--v-r - e ..--7-7,,;/.-, ,..:.; ---,:..,,,, ,16,..-1-., •-,...,,',.:N•.----.• .:.,' ,W.,.../--- ' -- ' •.-''''?1;,11--F- •r;;'..3 '-.1‘Y-• .:.474-9,W.&-ej-......i:,•:,,.., ••'%. ',.-,,- ' 4 ._, , .... , ,.:3„ ..\,..,,.....„..,.+._,..„. .,,.. ,... .,.... .....,, ... . . .,. , '>, -.V k •.:.=='-7-_,..'• ...;""•••: ... ,::-._7--- ., ' -,,,,,,,--"•-•'1.--..,,,..4•...,l, %.- , . ,. •••.-:•.1„ • .4. _ :.•\‘-\ 1 . , -24-4-..-i kr...,.,,„ i - -.:-•.•-,.1.,.,.o I, ,:--.:11.. ''''" 2..'''''''- ''''A..''';'' -•. '1."--.2';,'?'''•..r.-----::_-;_. -"....:',..-.--,-:'‘i.s.",*•,.ii4.';'','"-k''''1,4•';'!:;.''''../.:1,-,;:\--.:!-\5,--''---1.•=1.-';'''<'N'5 1:"..'''''''''''.-i"...%:•:--•-r--9.a ...•••-----, ., ___-' :-..i.::,- -IL... ''' ' 7-:-.1'.:•.::-.;....'r -71--f ' 4-.1:Pt! •i"-••' .1,._ '-1-;•• .(.',....,‘ . ,,.."----',. f'1,,,,. ...,•••••oc•=x0 J..-.-'.,:.- .1.1/."..'...CGD-.,L..........- ....,,..''0 0 11';;••:°.;'' %''.1''..;‘. - - s-li-.7-ii, . • 'i"'•:\-".. .;•'' --•.:.-;'-'''.. '. "I.1%),'-_ ./:.:-, --. • '. -. ---.'-, .--7/117' '-•• i-,.---`,_4 r,.. (7,,-.,.....-,:•4, . ,:. -.1.k.. g..,-„.(4,i2_-_ . . , -• •-: •-....,/ •,:.k'-•..,,,,,':',„..._,?, ,\--,..1..-.._... ..'._ .,,., '--•\i'' ,20 i-Z7-•'';i p if.,i.',. ' , ,,. k,! . ;;;,.Az...ey., ,:9. :-,w:uL.TA '• '•,-,-.r. :_--"..Y.'..-, . ,, , ,, ,,.„.,,: ,, „ “., ,,, . ,. ,,,.,.,..:L. •,' - ',..i; ' .' ---i 1-':-; ,,!--'7"--,,•--'__,, FINV.ie',k'," °•.. 717--. -- 1‘‘.-• '---e--k--1....-5.-2:-'-' . ..,. s,(. ,2,1.=::',ZA v.• :,, .•..'. ,.., :.•'.., --••,:-..:,..•4;.•.. / ii-1--i :.'.1 i -:,..i.'.''.“ ..'"';'„,•;--z,;. ',2:'• •',.:-•f 1,'V!:.'".. •-•it-•-•,!1:':',:.W,,-,,. .'si..4.,:,V,.‘,.,.-.,!,,,,,,- 1 ,,r.,7/-4 ..•;:.‘,41,„:,.; _,-....„1,,,oLp.r.-.,_ ...--A:Q.4a,.,..,;":3, kr-_-;:;7__: --47-r- - •_,:i '`,-s.:?..:1-4..1,...-,,;--,,-;'1::..7./7'..'.',.:•.,•-•2 -,_--;'::....r-•, ' '- /4,•:-2...4.,` 7. •;•,-:-",.--1'.,-.'-:-;‘, ;.1,.:-,, ..."--'4',,t-..;•...- A).::•r• . ..:-.7 - - ,„,-, .,....... gtii...-,,...,:&..,----,:...... •-__17)-:.. n,:.,:i!.'..:,,,,,,;,*_. .-:.•,,: -,..,„ •• ,.,-4, . -, - ,-... 'i,A'r,-**j- ' '",-;.e=ri3:.,',. V:i•ilt\''''‘f.-F7f--.:".-,---:.:T . 1-E•--ri,-,---:-.S-:'.1 - .:,.:::1, ,,.•)•.,,'• ':aii--.1.,.!....7.--zr":79"/,' `. --- - -''s. , /: ...,,'.'-'•'.:-1! 4_ '4 '_;.'--'.. -,';:e. ..4: . ,•-•:_-_.13 - -1.- - i.... : •-... -:.1,-,-I.-, F••'---.. ,•:"-. .1.51.i.,',.,...2.,c.:.,.-.,,J..":,,, .. . L.:7.-i..._ ., ..7/2. "•"'"!Ir:''...--..,.. :7.•, :"--.'' ,e-:.-;,:,A‘.,••,•;-.74`"' t".., ---:.ii N".• •-:.:,,;,'-•:‘•'•,..!!--fr.::: . .---•-:',..u.- .017.7".. . 1 --i. •• •"-"s-;L/-f°'1"-‘-.•'''''''`.'''‘.,'.112'9,•:1,!\`, .:1.1-i;'•41 2-- "::-.'•, -',..->- --,-,,IPI ._.,....;-,. :i'. r, :,,...,, /.,,t.--:.-p.,..,i,,.. .......4.--=_4.F..,-;_x -..,1,'•-•:.-..., ,-7 •...r-.,_,,,_,- . _ , •V,.`;1::: -.tii.•-':iii'A i.__ ,..1,i,...jr_,__....- -ti, TIA,---.e,.-L,''E'I' ! --;,-. :'---..../.•.! .•.- i i. :.'",.".,i.'-, :•,--,•'r.'.'-',9;-..' .- N C:'IA•;"j.:7. ' - '''''"..•.77"•-:...:,--7,*::•"1-.• -:-.C.r--,•-"1: •, Yji.- :.:.',- V...`. •'17: _,:-, ••••.:•::----,..,N :i."' -......•' Y„,t r,FF- --: • ,• : ./... . ,+ ,•.i'lf. '1, ;-,- ',-..:•.-;- ',:•Liy.'?,.,-.:,...,-/ i '--',1-•-• ,•%,' ;a`,r,-,•---..• .1---------'"I! gr.,-.--7. • : -....- 7.•.-: -14t:.- -•"..: - •--4.--arA ..:-.-ti .;,......ty• ,„...e,',,. ,- -A. 7.4.;,:l.,;;''....:,,:-..,.: ->.-..-, 1,,--;.6:-...-4 7d,.:,.. r3:-........,;:-._-_-:-- -.--. ,•:-.- „,-,1:-7.;,..*-.77,- ,;..;..- ....:-„IR... _-. -r-..,•4 i ,•;;I•is -1„1./„...:t•-5-,,,, ..i(L.,!,-7-...1 7'.,:".•' .j k....,-),;•,.......,k". ,- -•,r;-':•' ,,,,-4.-- ,.2. ...-=:-.1-:.7..-i--- ;.:., _--...,-.,:,..-- - ,..-,!,. :11-A ffA -7..? :k.i.-•:_4'1•••E:1 '-;- ...-• .-' .- • '':- -...`'...'. ‘:' ' ' i,'; '1.-' ---.b.. - i zz, ..... '' ' i'L'i; - .... .-,." -,,-..-.....w.-...-A.•-.-.-,--I,.‘ .:. -:-,..-.e.---i,-.., ' '.'• •,,s •---.-si•---.-1-.. '--E-%• -.-47•7.--: .... -.,a ----'-'241....-•2.1''5 11.1 ...•-4-""..-')•%t"---Hr‘'-X".''..-'"'. ' ' (.`,.•-•"Y.;;•71---'--"-F.---•---;-:•-•;710_,i•:-7'...J',...:.,-.."',. ,, n, ,.--ii‘',,;! •-.‘ -7_4.,.?.t....}.,-.4-ff._i ,-,q-.;.......1,.--1'...,...,'-"1:1.-it iti,if•Z.7.f•-c-,1!,,"-r-4:__:_.-..KT--''.:--4.',-. -••T.- ',-...":"-•.-. 17-.. - 7- 14c1 •,-;--. =-,;.1".' 1,..•:-...t7-t.:,' 1.'•,., -, •'. ,../j."':---'7---"-:=---,,-_•7:':_:... --;' .-.'' ,• ' ,'. •,..- ..1- -;:pN"%: '7;, .-,-1.-- 1!•.-'., -._=,:- , ', ,'.. -,7...-'-... .,--,,--2 -. • ' -,,-,-,.-,1/.I ' ',-- - - : -•/•-;.....-r?';',,,'!-. '.' ,v.,','k..'''..a-.7-g:.•.4.•''. .''''.;.L''..--....! .-, , ... . .-zi '-.0 Y.'-",',,t':'---..;f- ,:-.-'• '-:, -•-:;,-' ,'-_ ..;`.....7- '14.___ .1 ,... I ,,....,,--.1 ..f.,`.,'_.,....,. _ .--- ,..- ,• .. ..'„;"7"-",_-••••,:.';',...5+,-,-,.`_ • ' 1114N '' 4' - • ..--• 0 -1r .2''Z." -' --' 4.- ,-- --... F-'t -,-,,, ":.• ....1/..2.4:',..:e;•'\:',/%1' .,.'' 'I '4,, ':i - • ).-1'N.:447-1, ?1 -•-.F-x.--32.-"IF....' •--I" • "- ''.• '•-••'.'"-"•"7 ••-•'''-''''It-4:110'1".0'3-:-• --• '4-4;71.--:--•---•7P-,t.••-• -- _, •-,,,,, ••••• t..:••-•." ,o_..,..._-! ••••• • "7_-_tkl...... .,","?...!,t •" ,,:.'"_ii,....4 ;,--7--..,p. -- ,. • •, i -_-,_?.---- --.--i-ii, ,.:-:.- -.,-. ..-. •.:-- ,,., . . , 1 ' ...sf-rn? ;,Iv s:=4-, - - ._ ' .; •-•,.,• -''--..' ,-,i•-•--.74.N-- --.t.'.4-,'3 !--*:i.-r-._fi 11 r • ---r.,,,A.• -,- - -,_ , ,--s• --i•-z-..--, ..-,.?„.,,- . -, . . •. .• • ._. - , _.,..... . •-- -.., •-•i4i.,,,.,-;i4,kk....:,,,,,,-..-,----_ .0. - •-,...-i-q,--- .: -- ,•7•-:-,.••-•-_.-..1-_..fi.- . .... •_ .• - --,_.---.7.g-•,,,,,.- ,-.-. . ,-.. z-_,-, , . . - ,!--.- -- - .‘-r ,e- :,.. '... - • -•.---- '. '''-. -;'''',',,`,:.•••.1. - -- --- . , - ; • ' -.. ' ' . ,:._ --- --,,, -4 41,-.1'.74-.7.::. -- - - n ' ,•. • ' '"i', ' ' '. '. ,' . ..,.: --•.. -:'t.';..A.. -7'. -.-'"- LT-k--.7- 2-7il-1.-7 a' . ' ,, ''-'1•---- '''':”.•'--':-, '.',6'‘•-'''.- --a7";-''--7-74-A"-'7' - -- ' •'_ ". . 2-; ..,,,. . . . ' ..,-, - -. _ . --, . , • ;•.-• • ' _-.... .2,.".'7,-..7:.,,, [... ,,;:".71.1-_," ..•-:---; --,.. -•=-'••••".:S rA":••:":. .,...."'_ __......."-•:-.71:-2"7-77-7:7 :'-7-:i:-,:.t. .4,' -1.-":".i.....",-. 4.-77----1.... -,t- ,.::_i.""z " -:-:-,-.-..7.-:‘, - . " '.._.-"... t. ' -• ''': ,',',','-'':". :.,-: .•:'-`, e'r-•.,14 'ti.1-:::....i'•.#X.'!-F iiikf ---17-.1, -7..e.• r;.,,,,•••,•:':-`7•7.77.1"7.=.:7•7.--":-.7,7..".- :.1..i: -„,..."!'..:•.:7." ,....'",-' .. ..7.,...1.3 ;;,:-.: ,.,....".,_•:.•.,,, -.:.7...7,.i. .: . ,:,•_:::., ,. ,.___ : ,.:.,i ---• ' i-----='------\ --7'7',N -:'W,-'-ii:!.;,...A_-:::''''!'''-:c.-- '-•'‘.4 -',''':2,.- '--;-.'4-...-4 ,:=tfe1:•L'.:-: ' . -,. , e • '',;. ,._ A ...?7,-- _ _„,„,i ,i 1-3-:-...-- _,,.-__.-_-----:,4_,.. ---,-;-{-4*. .,....ii..;;;.-...ifyo.--:-,-,•,.-:,•••:,,,A 'c,-:-._;-----.Acii)..-c_--m7.- -:. . .., • - ....7-1 ,z_-h.. -.. t----,Nt." --, 7,41,-ifr---.V---•, 44`. •:7.7-..- 7, ':k i_i-- . ;--11 k- fli__-,.------ .. .":.--,-,7.,,:",:IN-_i:A. Ai..1:4,>,4..`. .7_11 ,7 r, .', .-_,•ft ‘,•-';'-,,it,-,.f-',..„--_a.7.7,-. _) , ,, _. f‘:,, ....,, os-s.‘ ,4_7e,kg,-,-/- .Lra , ....•;.-1,s . .: .1.:g4.7..mi =•„.7-_- _--.4 „,4,s'42._t,__, -„_.,..,,.__,:----4 •;.,..,,if..,,C-.'1,1 ,'.!::.k--_ ,. - •-- ..,.% - ---s--4--. ',.„,- T . . ' .--'f.'• ic.,.•,<,,_; ,,..-c-,',:''-',..,,",44-i,"; . - 4 j -.-:_•„=.___=__-.4--?,a_z..r..4....-.V , - -4'1 ;•:.,,-..,„:.:.;ta. .----•_1:.-- --,..2id....-.:,..., ,,=1.4-7.t;....-1-,z•,-:J_•,.-..1.--....'?....e,......• ,)!.-5 r,?, ' - .:--4 -7,4._z-,_-. ' : ' , .-, ,5,s-:: ..,,,,'-,kz.4....:-..gr. ./. . - , :..,..,-.., ,. - •‘,..-.-.,-.--m---..-.-,,, - •,-....,.!,,,;,...:,.,..,-,1-4_,;_,....-,. ..,.4.IZ-, ' -. •,--_if..--_-..,M 1.--:- - ' ' ' . Y.,..i.y .,'':--'4,:-----9'.' 'At" 1.i/..7."7---- - ' 71 5-2 gt--.=",-7-..tZ, ' - -f-i'-' ..-:'", q'1../.4rIJE•., -. .- -__-__7:::!`", •=.-!-'-',_'".2-7-&-A41, t,Y.'1.'7•',-,--.-••,.•-,:-::: .. -• '4.0,, "st...;-:_:_,-7n-7,-.71,-,--. • . ,..-- .7.7-...:_9:L -'.--"-.g_i ,-...L. ,,...•.•.•••.,, --, „ .....„. _---__TA 5...„--.77-1'..4, ---rs -.i.-.4'___ ,--.: ,.'-- 2.••1-i. .• --N.:•.:-•.-,,.• '7-7.- -,,,',. AY,'.' ..7,'„,%c:','' '');.;6:1.. --": i.-.--s...7..-7-: '', - ': --17-..•-,.--:,"•S•'' ,•_..0%;‘,A? .r---.:,%.::- .-..3'''',7,7-71 Fa_ ' •"-.7-!?-"gz3.4":12 r...14-. - -=,-,•-,-;\.. - •••,,.,,s,..2. ..__ __.-.__--------,..r7-', --,)'5,7;7;--..,;,_/..'__-,_:. ' i . ''•_'.----_,_ \,,i,.-\1/4. !' •i: -'•;-'''-f-i,15',./.'.,,'• '--.1 7....;*;:_- i7.--,s-- =1...-.7•-. 1:4-7.-7,-: ;cc•-•`"" • cw-. • "• •' -.-tfie.av ,--_,-..4.-_ __LL--,:-=_--;i-_-,:.- , .-,;.---.1„---,A ,, . .,-,‘5,-_,,.,_•--------_______-- ---__ , ,........ , , • ..,._.'i--,-,-._:,),.. --, ------i---T--•--•.'_••••,,, -. i•,.;, -.'.' `_:-.---,..,:',1,-------i-i---•--, .___. _____ .7.-......-4,---._•3 ____:- __*--.1:4-7---.-, ... --_-...-_...f. --Li-:-..„,...r..-____-_-.....1--=-,...... .,. .•...-__„,..-‘, . 4.,.. --. ,__,..,..„..„_.._,..,... _ _. qt•-•-•7 "--.•4-4,0,'--- 1-3 i,-..-,-,,•.N..... :-..---,--. --;-__ - .-.7 • -= --7.-i----.-.::----- \--F..-z--,7--s---N---::,,,------,t- ---_ -•-•.__:•-_,_7:___.-__-_-__..- ----- .7'. • _.,..-.7.-.:,.• %.2,,,. '.. ,,,,i,.........-:,-,aft-7.-.---_._ ___,....---_ ,-,--;„_..--__ 24-'' '• ----'' -----.-.,.... .--,---1--7,........1,''':;.,..f"'- ...x',7--'.-_-_•:- - -5.....--,---...,-:&.-- --,-.--------L-'57-:",-- - C-7--4!---.--7.7"---7A -.,, ,,:f,.,,----------_.....,. _ .---:-'- -,.-''•• •.,.,, ---' .-/-1 ---- --R\--. -, -.• ---•-:4,-.,.*_,--v--7-.-- -,;"..4' ' -1.1-..,1,..4-...,..im. -..: -.?-b--e-,i.-_-E-.71.---.7 . _-.:7-ta,.---_--..L-wi -\,---•=- .-:,,,:f.,..f.•!..,,...„--;.„:.---....,7-1---&-•-- -- -=.,, -,....,-,..,..:-,.,..,-'1 , ,e::::.,,,,,'‘,L:`,7,...4),4: . :...:-..W.f2_,V±"-- ,... g 1,-,^-, _ - ,, ., 4:-H •'''ik. ?C..,i,-:-.:?;,-,4.4-cr.p.7. y• rvf.,-,-:,..;7y,..,...-717:11.....„%"7„.;:: ..,-T-.-*gz-_ --,:i.-7--‘-_--i-- ---f- :':---L'--k‘?'..:.,$t)';9 a.-- - .- ' ' -,-'------r---,.,',' -'.._-_-_...,.01-f-Y-71 -i.';--ri,1-_f_---.--,-:--- 'a:;.•?----1!:-AW.,--I' ! -----'.---.2_:_._._r__'--",-;;Z----.. .7----,=_ ;FA.0-''-7 ,•441iif5-•-----'17A --if- ----_-_-=---•=\4-r••••,:o;'..:1- ' '-:''''";'.-: :a ., 1•:,''.'•-•"..---i-,--." 1,;:,-7."--..._• -. ,....-_-.„.„..,- ,- •,,..,._ -..---, --.-4 c,,.-I)+,..,.. -....._.- -_,..-.:- t,-.A.-, ,...i..../:•-;;:e, _ "-•,'._:_•,--..1.-/,, ..: ."':...--.---:--'.3 ,.......!..;.*--_--w .---....r._r•_.-7.-=,...___.,--7....--2,,e \,_.--..,. -:..'...,..:4:, ‘ ,A.. ---..- ..---""- -: •"""''''''(..,.e.--' •'..1(' •'•''s••--1 ' ''''• •"--=''''1_ -) ,..bi/ '-1--'' -__4--.-.4:-.:•!..t.- - --\f•:;'.-; '.V-•••• v'', ,.--t.„ -..,-..,7.-:-_ • • •:i i.-",,';',.,:-.--•';.,f;.....1- --' -i.,....A.1,--1 im-..L..-:-.--i] .t.- ;..._.-_...,_ ,1.,,...-1_1. -t.....iji ii.,,:-.,f.-..•,... .:F....Ei....,!,..4.-; -7_ r.:.,;(.:("q...,„:-,.... " --1.--'..-',.':--..-.4 . •.-"'':..-7,1.?‘-. •.r''-j -'"V-..'' ...'"r0 L-- •- _.•_.•`' '----i'- .L:\ - Fii•-•-,,77.'4._ -_ __ _-'-'-'-"'"' ..--",,::-,t':"-.',E-4.-e7:;:-..';--\, ers' ,":.::7-,... •_,.i'f":". -1•:.:*•rcriVil-'45-... ' A777.,---- F-1---.4•-:---T9 I V" ,.'`-'-' 0 X .". """• • ` •-i---4-"--".1'"."''-;Pi'-‘...,-..t. , ...17.1-7:nt."4.-,...:7_•i-• . -1'4?-;•''', '''''' IA .. _...._._.._... ZEE- _':' -'- -----2:----.-.-"rFr•-•:-:-:--"- -1'--..\'‘`,..,. _,L.-,, ',..,."-- _41,Vi?.....s.,.a ',',,;.:,:!..1:",---. .-..--.. r.-;.--z..-t.----,---q ---- ve,....,--------_. i ,..,-77,,...-...4. . - ,„....... ..::_ •,, ,..0,.., . . .- -t.......-,-....-5, ' ',"-----------: ---a-...L--:::-..."-=---------7-_-\--7-'---.::\s",..-z->"`_.,-;.--l-.:r. ..'0;',...,' -7./-,- (.;-..---;,.'' ..,:--.:'-'-;,,c-v.:i..--,1r.--47.-_-_,_---- ...., -1? '-0FT„..:__,:,-,‘",.-,\:,\'''--._-.---_.:-,-q. 114-:---4-',,.4.. ::,-7,.‘1.,;•.,.,:,::.!..,,,,.'=4....k,,,.1.:2,11_6,,,,,.. v,...--. ,_.:77.7.7.::,..,i,.. .....T:.- ...._ '--7. _ _=-----7- ,' . --=-u:M r.•--._._.,)...,,,.T1---7-,--':,,,,•-;:---±-1 is-•'./. .__.\. :-__,,.,..----•-t.1,::::.,,--,:‘ii',-.;.•••,,, ,,:-•?:.t?..t,l.i,t,1;-::--.11-.,:..•:i_..•:.,..7...1i,,,.',.... -,:).,,,i. :.,..i',...:r,,,....4 1,n A.L7,....,._: ,.,.:--14 lsn.,.7,...,;.:.,,i,v _-=:_,,,. . .4.14;,,r,.,...:,....,4t...01.p....:Apz."F9,,-..r,-.,:,,..1:...:..7.:,,i. ...1_7-7,,-A___-..._,ri,..7.4,7.,.- -„...., __: -:.=--- ...'''--- _,--.2-.2'- :7-1_ _..----• •'.,-.:=-- •:.....;;...- .--.-,.-.-•,.„. fr:•-•-•-.,,..---,---:. ...,--i.-..:,•,-,q,;',.,...4••;•,..•,v," .......,..--_-_sl -,.9.ts.'ii.:.',. ..- •••:.--%.,,.:.;--'.-L-.,,.....7%%--s-• :1-i.i g•-:::,-..,::----.--.-- 1,-7.. ----'---ifi• -,--- --' --i;-7,-.E.,--;-_- _:•----,-- --_- -_-.--',- - -7.25,..' \,' :- ,--;:....-:.•'...,\''..•,.i-,,_, A 1-.•-.1..04-•-• -.t,'•':'-.-1..-.-----,..'*.•-.-'.•''',:..'r-;-..-.',..7,p1,.„. ..a i....-.7:-.•:„.7._.,..,---_-, t--7-37-..,t-.,--,;-'.10?,-- '-'41-4girif!..;k.,i',-- ..417:A-:Er..---..:-- - 1 s A-2.-f--------......-----:•-_---.4--.._-,- - -------fy .-•<-. _ ---.-•.--:', -, .'7.1 ;-•,:1.•;::, ...TI-1‘,:....`,•?;4:.-7.-i tt:,ii--: --2".'""3 •-Y. -,--e-;‘,.-:.-'1.'::•,','', '-:''' -4.-'-:-1.,i`--:7(::::.1"„,„..0{-•••,..,1-• ".".-11W-.::7-7 -.:.,,•..: -1-?-f'.i. •..----s-',,_ir__:-11_4:k__-7-- -,•_„_. -.11-- - - .. '-,-i..•''..‘ •1-i•-k.1,.%:1-.'.,,,,-;,,:,s,-..slf;:-,-;".,;,''A':?:-.;.'-ii;-..1...,21';,..,:;1.;i-;.).,21--•-_.:. -- ',..,; .i;•_1!!:c.-'4,i!''!-.-',..ni ,:t-,1 -....g=!-°'-'4,e--,--.. /II."'..,:i.- ._• r...---. ••r--,-!!--.-----z--i,,,q 1._,,,_. --._..,-,- - r-1-7---,--.-. •-":-•-.., _ . ' ',--;.•w.-........7:.:-.'...:''.•••,::.-1.,-:•-••,..-; --.--:• -5.y-:-•--71..7- %..--7;•vz.-...,s-• - -,:-,---,...w..._••:-;,,:z....-,,A ,,,. 41. .4.-....--='--__ -„•,,,_.!•i71-TNT"',-7-:--_717.--3E-4:4:4-7 -.--_-.-_;-,--. 7.:.•:---1----_.f_.,-._ . • - - --- -------',s' i-;•,•'-' • f•-••-•--,_-_..._- '- '--_:- --,_.:.,-.•• '.- --- , .-.=,--3.,s,i---...---'Il z;,,- ,'4,'' :-fflr--A-F.E.s,__, . -*.-_-'4.ifs 4 "-- •:-.•-• -- • - , -7T-..„..,.;_ .-r_.::-:...-_---:- '••---''--i----_:.4-_.__-;', - .: _----V.,.., - c.•_•-ri a.."-- :••..-- -..,,--,--:.:,--..r.:-.2_ ----,------• ,.,..-:-.. - ..,....-,- --.-..._.. ._.4-_-:.,, _..___:.,• - ...,.....,....:,,- -- ,...- -- -. --...-:-,- -' . r- --.:..-'_-_-:„.----=-----,.7...-...---i..7r.--. ,,-__-___--,-.-.:.,,,F--.1h.:-..--...._-:-• __,.. _ - -- e=:-..--- -r-- .-"------.--.--, - L.,7--,:.-4.-.- ---------,1,1,7„- +_1... -• ., • - -= J ...--..g:.7,-.,-rA"--,-,-- -.____.. .--_.=,.--T' ,'-:-..'..4-%-.--....--eT,-- -' ,,---m-.------_''.-=--•'-- ---, .--- .------ ______ __'-• " -",*--.7_7,=-_r,---_ ..... T-,-;,- :, T:i_--..,-Z--. S'. ._ '-'•---• •------"'"=-• --- =..": .1.-- •-•.'-'-'''''',=4...'"'-'-=IL-------tE --.a.t4' _-- --.---• --•--, ,.-...7....-.--• -,-,----'-'..-:- -' - - '-,'="-,r-Ar--. : ...••=:-.- . -7."-:0"-_-., :04:3 •-•" -----=-'"•--'-'---'''-''''''' - .17--77.--. '""''•17-.. ,•• ..----.. -------- :_._ . ...-=•._-_ - - 7-a., -. ,. , . A-7• ".....rs:7. . -.*-:-....._. 1 .7.--, ------,---.-------s-7, .: -- :'- 7 -- _ . ,,'. .-s.,.--r-.4-_,-;-,1-',,.._%.„.., 4..s,---:.- ‘,----.-r_.... ..s.s--,s.7.---EsF•_,--„....-_,..-.,, -1,..-,--_,•, -5=-- -Is-------:-_-------==.----=="‘-- -_---,--- -----.--7---- .. .----tos- .-..--_-,,,,...__--,_ . - . - ... .... __. ...„-,.,..,,,. .::7L..-::.ik., ,;„..;:n::,,:,--„..,. ._ , :. • - ::- '--- ----'-i-z -'-''':•‘-4; .1141....••.•li'L'Al.-:747.'i..7.!.1/43-:: Li..z.i.L,...• -,.„7;... ...,...i;,y,. ....:,.../ . „..,7 lisi..„.0. . .. 1 rm *-?':''r: . 1' ''' .'-'-'''' 'lS..2...... ‘.7:1.7 7- -- - 7Vi*NeirlOilitils;:.'''':•- •::..74''7."'-•'''''''':-.-:.' - :• APOSS Et:Altura-Vendln /Bath 00 s . - iti :::. ,_ .. ny -.wit• '.:7.. ••-...5ii....0.1,...m.E.4.,::••!--,z,-EL--;-_,J0-4.-,..44::. -:.,-..-...1-7;.-:•,•-_-::-._ - .----.-.--..,:. -z ...----f::,,..-:, ..:.....=.-•• -- -_".:--: •......et _ n_.0. . „ • .:. - wiiii.-•''...„Piii-ibitf.....'''S'-gliirSug.ilif..0iit..._ -:--7,174;5-J"Z. .'7';ifebti.. ..,....61, 49..red„.......Pe,„.11o8„,ty,Rob......,..d.-,.., -,-_ -- •..,...-„, ..,y Clinic/-Office i.- ...RIMS' .. .• - • .--.. .... .70ilit4"...Peatike--...-;.:96--"Y•egii-10-0--11-''Out..__ . - - le Bititi...-Exhibit/Feature .. ..1PossitiiP-,'•64.4-.: .. :.3!.00• 0. sf Holding Building ... • New Office:Buildieg • • •. .. •••-••. .......,. . .. . . _ Turkey Vultures&Hawks. - 0,FutureGueslAttmployee Serypes • New Guest Services Building .. ..-.SOC‘• pe..bi;Obijiii-2-BORciD4V---'' North American Teaching Stream . , • . . - ... .--.---.--,-i-.-52.l;;••l••:". .• -.'-.r7..-.Af4.-'..‘.,..7".i.'-L.i•'4f.-:•.1'':-f:-'t:'.-..'r'F.'-".7..-7-.-:.,:-.'.'.."s:"'.., .1•..--.•-.•F..7•-7."1,7••4',•:r.:7•:.`4•,::Eg:;-'''''','•• --....:.i'.--,i-'-4,••- ',• Future---s---.:-FOs W L•F o-r,e s-t Exhibit .. • •Future-EsAht-ibit - - Fture " X100 Penenle h It Future Coreer YsT-1*M..•Z on-e L ' .. betif Interlbr.•44•000iExteior, Exhibit- Future DrftWPlaY.542 Years Tttue6BIrdSrpw81(04hqw19On( • .,='-,. _,.....-,;:. ,Ey:tureDisCiPiery: ...245 Years '' ' ----ig • .-- i', -,-:,,,- •,i .......-1-:.,.•-•:.•:...,„„.._... . .. - --- -----'4'• ' -ii--- - ''''''''' r.'•-lcieWSelitHliVeranila3rig b5t,--- • • - - - • •- • - -..,:t '',-.-_;--...f---- ------57.---7-...;,-.-_-.4135--r".,T,}-..T :it:4.--:F':"...Vdif.W.-- ' '-14.7::E,; -i:7-!--,T."----:-.77-.t7--,-.:_.:•2!!-'-.-- ,,.. -.7_, --•--- ' -_-_..2.:5_...„...4.,-.,2,-_,.„-•-7-:-._. f- .--.1--._._-_-••_--.7..-..-..-.7-,--.0-7.-'7,,=.,--•.•.."..-...,=.-.:•":..-.".r.-, -_y- 2 Draft C.---1:=- -_2", ..-.-.-_- _.;.--.:.T_-:.•=,•,,,.-._-,.-..,•.=_,t _,-;_..v.....-.___e-_v___. -,„--- ......,..,_ ...?..„.......___, ...._„„i, ':".-••••"•-•--7- -- •-•--4--------7•••-•,--"--------;''-.`•--••.-.t---'.A,''«•••'-`''!•-'--.---.•-,--"-7i••-",'•J-----•::.r--'--Z_--.•"--..A.--i-7,-.."..i.":.:::.7_,::.,.1---.•:".----. --...,..7.7-•-,..,.,.....-._,. .___'!:--. - _ - -..•---r...,...":7--".....7..-..x,_..?A...-"r"...-....-.----7,-,,_ ,i.A........, -_, SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: February 24,2011 SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2010-00064—Mayor Ralph Becker—request to change the City's zoning regulations to updated and provide clarity to the City's zoning regulations. (code maintenance—zoning regulation fine-tuning) AFFECTED COUNCIL DISTRICTS: If the ordinance is adopted it would affect Council Districts citywide. STAFF REPORT BY: Nick Tarbet,Janice Jardine ADMINISTRATIVE DEPT. Community Development Department,Planning Division AND CONTACT PERSON: Lex Traughber, Senior Planner COUNCIL ACTION: Consider an ordinance to update and provide clarity to the City's zoning regulations. COUNCIL AUTHORITY - RELEVANT LEGAL REQUIREMENTS: The City Council,as the legislative body, is authorized through State law and the City's zoning regulations to make the final decisions on land use issues after receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Code references and notice requirements are noted below. o Utah Code,Title 10,Chapter 9a Municipal Land Use Development and Management Act o City Code,Title 21A Zoning, Chapter 21A.10 General Application and Public Hearing Procedures and Chapter 21A.54 Amendments • Zoning Ordinance Notice requirements: Newspaper advertisement,posting a sign on the property and written notification 12 days prior to the Public Hearing • City Council Notice policy: Newspaper advertisement and written notification 14 days prior to the Council Public Hearing PROCESS: Process to Date The Administration's transmittal provides a chronology of events relating to the proposed zoning regulation changes. Key dates are listed below. Please refer to the Administration's chronology for details. February 15, 2010 Petition delivered to Planning Division. March 1, 2010 Petition assigned to planner. April 15, 2010 City-wide Planning Division Open House. December 8, 2010 Planning Commission public hearing. January 5,2011 Ordinance received from City Attorney. January 18, 2011 Transmittal sent to Community&Economic Development Dept. January 26,2011 Administration's paperwork received in Council Office. 1 Next Steps March 1,2011 Council Work Session briefing Should the Council choose to move this item forward at this time,Council staff has identified the following tentative dates: March 22,2011 Set hearing date(tentative) April 5,2011 Public hearing(tentative) April 26,2011 Council Action(tentative) POTENTIAL OUTCOMES: If the Council approves or declines the proposed ordinance: • Approval: o An accessory structure would be allowed in the side yard setback behind the primary structure. o The Delta Center and Franklin Quest Baseball Stadium would be referenced as a"sports arena", "sports stadium"along with the address of the facilities. o A definition for a pitched roof would be provided. o Existing language for Fraternities and Sororities would be changed. o The Summary Tables of Yard and Bulk Requirements would be removed from the zoning regulation for the Residential,Commercial,Manufacturing,Downtown,Gateway and Special Purpose zoning districts. • Denial:The current zoning regulations referenced above would not change. KEY ELEMENTS: A. The Administration's paperwork provides the following information relating to the proposed zoning regulation changes. 1. The City adopted a comprehensive Zoning Ordinance in April 1995.At that time,it was understood that adjustments to the Zoning Ordinance would be necessary once it had been implemented and people had an opportunity to work with it. 2. Salt Lake City intermittently processes fine tuning adjustments to provide code maintenance for the City's zoning regulations. 3. Overall,the framework and structure of Salt Lake City's zoning regulations and development standards are sound and do not require wholesale restructuring. 4. Amendments selected for this process meet the following objectives: • Improves the clarity and usability of the zoning regulations without changing the intent behind the specific regulation in question,and clarifies wording that may be open to interpretation; • Addresses ongoing problems with administration of the existing zoning language,and may result in a minor policy change of low significance; • Implements the City's Comprehensive Plan;and • Provides ordinance consistency with existing policies and objectives. B. An ordinance has been prepared for Council consideration to change the following sections of the City's zoning regulations. The ordinance will become effective on the date of its first publication.The proposed changes and discussion relating to the reason for the change are summarized below. (Please refer to the Administration's paperwork and the proposed ordinance for details.) 1. Chapter 21.A36—General Provisions—Table 21A.36.020B Obstructions in Required Yards • Allow an accessory structure in the side yard setback behind the primary structure. 2 • Discussion: This provision would allow an accessory structure to be located behind the primary structure but not necessarily within the rear yard setback unless otherwise precluded by the specific zoning district. 2. Chapter 21A.46—Signs, Section 21A.46.110(A)(3)(b) & Section 21A.46.120(E)(4)(b)—Sign Regulations for the Delta Center and Franklin Quest Baseball Stadium: • Remove the proper names"Delta Center"and"Franklin Quest Baseball Stadium"and add generic terms"sports arena", "sports stadium"and the address of the facilities. • Discussion: The names of the actual arena and stadium have changed and may change again in the future. Rather than providing a specific building name in the zoning regulations, it is proposed to describe the use and its location. This action will prevent the need for future text amendments as they relate to these facilities. 3. Chapter 21A.62—Definitions,Section 21A.62.040—Fraternity/Sorority House • Rearrange the existing language. 4. Chapter 21A.60—List of Defined Terms, Section 21A.60.020 and Chapter 21A.62—Definitions, Section 21A.62.040—Pitched Roof • Define Pitched Roof as the covering on the top of a structure, serving to protect against rain, snow, sunlight,wind, and extremes of temperature,and having a minimum pitch or slope of a two foot(2')rise over a twelve foot(12')run. • Discussion: Pitched roof is not currently defined in the zoning regulations. 5. Remove the Summary Tables of Yard and Bulk Requirements for the following zoning districts. • Chapter 21A.24—Residential Districts,Table 21A.24.200 • Chapter 21A.26—Commercial Districts,Table 21A.26.090 • Chapter 21A.28—Manufacturing Districts,Table 21A.28.050 • Chapter 21A.30—Downtown Districts,Table 21A.30.060 • Chapter 21 A.31 —Gateway Districts,Table 21A.31.060 • Chapter 21A.32—Special Purpose Districts,Table 21A.32.150 • Discussion: In the past,the summary tables have not been routinely amended and updated, as necessary,to reflect the specific changes to the lot and bulk regulations for various zoning districts.In addition,the summaries found in the tables are not always specific enough to accurately portray the regulations.They are simply a summary and not a comprehensive table. Comprehensive zoning information is located in each zoning district chapter noting all development standards for any particular zone. Rather than have summary tables that are included in the Zoning Ordinance and more difficult to change when inaccuracies are found, summary tables will still be provided to help citizens and applicants in a more concise way,but a lengthy process to change the information will not be required. C. The Planning staff report provides analysis and findings for the Zoning Ordinance Section 21A.50.050— Standards for General Amendments.The standards were evaluated in the Planning staff report and considered by the Planning Commission. (Discussion and findings for the standards are found on pages 5-7 of the Planning staff report.) D. The Planning staff report notes the request was routed to City Departments and Divisions for review. Transportation,Public Utilities and Engineering reviewed the proposed changes but had no comments. 3 1. The Building Services/Permits Office noted the desire to have the"Summary Tables of Yard and .r" Bulk Requirements"remain in the ordinance for ease of distribution to the public. 2. Planning Staff notes that because the summary tables are codified in the zoning regulations,they are difficult to change when inaccuracies are found. Therefore,staff recommends the codified "Summary Tables"be eliminated,and summary handouts be developed for distribution to the public. Summary handouts could then be changed and updated to reflect City Council action as often as necessary. E. The public process included a Planning Division sponsored Open House and written notification of the Planning Commission hearing to Community Council Chairs,business groups and the Planning Division electronic list serve. Notice was also posted on the City's website.The Administration's paperwork indicates there were no public comments received at the Open House and Planning Commission public hearing. F. On December 8,2010,2009 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and passed a motion to forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council excluding the proposed change for fraternities and sororities and recommending further review of this item.Discussion by the Planning Commission related to potential legal or discrimination issues based on zoning regulations that require a fraternity or a sorority to have a national affiliation. MATTERS AT ISSUE/POTENTIAL QUESTIONS FOR THE ADMINISTRATION: The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration in further detail the discussion by the Planning Commission relating to the proposed zoning regulation that would require a fraternity or a sorority to have a national affiliation. Some Commissioner's were concerned about potential legal or discrimination issues that may result from this requirement. As previously noted: • Planning Staff recommended this clarification;however,the Planning Commission chose to exclude this change in their recommendation to the City Council and recommended further review of this item. • This text amendment would provide consistency with the current regulations of the University of Utah that requires a national affiliation in order to become a fraternity or sorority of the University. • This change is not included in the proposed ordinance. • (An editing change that rearranges the existing language is included in the ordinance.) MASTER PLAN AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS: A. The Administration's paperwork notes the following relating to City policies and Master Plans. 1. The proposed text amendments are essentially a matter of housekeeping. 2. The purpose of the proposal is to correct minor oversights in prior Zoning Ordinance revisions, eliminate conflicting information,and to provide clarity for current,perhaps ambiguous,Zoning Ordinance language. 3. The proposed text revisions are for the purpose of maintaining,updating,and clarifying the Zoning Ordinance,and as such,are consistent with adopted City planning documents including Master Plans. B. In the past,the Administration has noted the following: 1. The community master plan land use policies generally define neighborhood,community and regional land use locations and characteristics. 2. They do not specifically address the level of detail that code maintenance addresses. 4 3. In Salt Lake City,the Zoning and Subdivision regulations have been the main tools used to implement the goals and objectives of the adopted land use planning documents. 4. The proposed changes do not alter the various purpose statements included in the Zoning Ordinance. • Additional citywide Master Plan and Policy considerations are provided below. C. The City's Strategic Plan and the Futures Commission Report express concepts such as maintaining a prominent sustainable city,ensuring the City is designed to the highest aesthetic standards and is pedestrian friendly, convenient, and inviting,but not at the expense of minimizing environmental stewardship or neighborhood vitality. The Plans emphasize placing a high priority on maintaining and developing new affordable residential housing in attractive, friendly, safe environments and creating attractive conditions for business expansion including retention and attraction of large and small businesses. D. The Council's growth policy notes that growth in Salt Lake City will be deemed the most desirable if it meets the following criteria: 1. Is aesthetically pleasing; 2. Contributes to a livable community environment; 3. Yields no negative net fiscal impact unless an overriding public purpose is served; and 4. Forestalls negative impacts associated with inactivity. E. The City's 1990 Urban Design Element includes statements that emphasize preserving the City's image, neighborhood character and maintaining livability while being sensitive to social and economic realities. Policy concepts include: 1. Allow individual districts to develop in response to their unique characteristics within the overall urban design scheme for the city. 2. Ensure that land uses make a positive contribution to neighborhood improvement and stability. 3. Ensure that building restoration and new construction enhance district character. 4. Require private development efforts to be compatible with urban design policies of the city regardless of whether city financial assistance is provided. 5. Treat building height, scale and character as significant features of a district's image. 6. Ensure that features of building design such as color,detail,materials and scale are responsive to district character,neighboring buildings, and the pedestrian. cc: David Everitt,Bianca Shreeve,Karen Hale,Lisa Harrison-Smith,Art Raymond,Holly Hilton,Ed Rutan,Lynn Pace,Paul Nielson,Jeff Niermeyer,Tom Ward,Rick Graham,Frank Gray,Mary De La Mare-Schafer,Orion Goff, Les Koch,Larry Butcher,Craig Spangenberg,Randy Isbell,Wilf Sommerkorn,Cheri Coffey,Joel Paterson,Lex Traughber,City Council Liaisons,Mayors Liaisons File Location: Community and Economic Development Dept.,Planning Division,Zoning Text Amendment—Code Maintenance—Fine-Tuning } 5 RECEIVED 1 ;saw wpm 2 5 L bANN1gE� g r ' FRANK B. GRAY 'w� �+/�/�p� DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DgL/eiOIJ1EI IL i/+►JINED�B .� OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR lr IiVV�V vVD��AT�CE' �� y g tY DE LA MARE-SCHAEFER DEPUTY DIRECTOR ROBERT FARRINGTON, JR. DEPUTY DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: ►AN 2 nu Da94, of Staff - 5 Date Sent to City Council: By CPI O2A I ZoiD TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 24, 2011 Jill Remington-Love, Chair FROM: Frank Gray, Community&Economic .� Development Department Director RE: PLNPCM2010-00064, Zoning Ordinance Fine Tuning—February 2010 STAFF CONTACTS: Lex Traughber, Senior Planner, at(801) 535-6184 or lex.traughber@slcgov.com RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council hold a briefing and schedule a Public Hearing DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance BUDGET IMPACT: None DISCUSSION: Issue Origin: The City adopted a comprehensive Zoning Ordinance in April 1995. At that time, it was understood that adjustments to the Zoning Ordinance would be necessary once it had been implemented and people had an opportunity to work with it. Salt Lake City intermittently processes fine tuning ordinance adjustments to provide code maintenance for the City's ordinances. Overall,the framework and structure of Salt Lake City's zoning regulations and development standards are sound and do not require wholesale restructuring. However, at times, code changes are processed due to land use policy changes adopted by the City or because of State enabling regulation changes. It would be beneficial for Salt Lake City to make minor code revisions that lead to a greater ease of use and understanding. 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH B4114-54B6 TELEPHONE: B01.535-6230 FAX: B01.535.6005 WWW.SLCGOV.COM/CED �� wcwceo r.>cn Amendments to the City Code selected for Fine Tuning processing meet the following objectives: • Improves the clarity and usability of the Zoning Code without changing the intent behind the specific regulation in question, and clarifies wording that may be open to interpretation; • Addresses ongoing problems with administration of the existing Code language, and may result in a minor policy change of low significance; • Implements the City's Comprehensive Plan; and • Provides ordinance consistency with existing policies and objectives. Analysis: Item 1. Chapter 21.A36—General Provisions, Table 21A.36.020B—Obstructions in Required Yards: Allow an accessory structure in the side yard setback where said structure is located wholly behind the primary structure. This provision would allow an accessory structure to be located behind the primary structure on a given parcel, but not necessarily within the rear yard setback unless otherwise precluded by the specific zoning district. Item 2. Chapter 21A.46—Signs, Section 21A.46.110(A)(3)(b)—Sign Regulations for Downtown Districts: Change the "Delta Center" sub-section title and the"Standards for the Delta Center" sign overlay to a generic sub-section title and standards for the sports arena located on the block between South Temple and 100 South between 300 and 400 West Streets. tea. Item 3. Chapter 21A.46—Signs, Section 21A.46.120(E)(4)(b)—Sign Regulations For The UI, PL, PL'2, I And OS Districts: Change the name "Standards for the Franklin Quest Baseball Stadium" sign overlay to "Standards for the Sports Stadium located on the southeast corner of 1300 South and West Temple." Item 4. Chapter 21A.60—List of Terms, Section 21A.60.020—List of Defined Terms: Pitched Roof- If a definition for"Pitched Roof' is adopted as recommended in"Item 6"below, and included in "Chapter 21A.62—Definitions,"reference should be made to this defined term in Chapter 21 A.60—List of Terms. Item 5. Chapter 21A.62 —Definitions, Section 21A.62.040—Definitions of Terms: Clarify in the definitions chapter that fraternities and sororities must have a national affiliation in order to be considered as a fraternity or sorority as it pertains to the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. This text amendment would provide consistency with the current regulations of the University of Utah, which requires a national affiliation in order to become a Fraternity or Sorority of the University. Planning Staff recommended this clarification, however, the Planning Commission chose to exclude this change in their recommendation to the City Council. The Planning Commission was concerned with potential legal issues based on a requirement in the Zoning Ordinance for a fraternity or a sorority to have national affiliation. Petitions PLNPCM2010-00064,Zoning Ordinance Fine Tuning—February 2010 Page 2 of 4 Item 6. Chapter 21A.62 —Definitions, Section 21A.62.040 —Definitions of Terms: Create a definition for"Pitched Roof" to be a roof with a minimum of a two foot (2') rise over a twelve foot (12') run, and add "Pitched Roof" to the alphabetized list of defined terms. Item 7. Eliminate the "Summary Tables of Yard and Bulk Requirements" for the various use district chapters throughout the Zoning Ordinance as follows: Chapter 21A.24 —Residential Districts, Table 21A.24.200 Chapter 21A.26 —Commercial Districts, Table 21A.26.090 Chapter 21A.28 —Manufacturing Districts, Table 21A.28.050 Chapter 21A.30 —Downtown Districts, Table 21A.30.060 Chapter 21 A.31 —Gateway Districts, Table 21 A.31.060 Chapter 21A.32 — Special Purpose Districts, Table 21A.32.150 In the past, the summary tables have not been routinely amended and updated, as necessary, to reflect the specific changes to the lot and bulk regulations for various zoning districts. In addition, the summaries found in the tables are not always specific enough to accurately portray the regulations. In other words, they are simply a summary and not a comprehensive table. Comprehensive zoning information is located in each Chapter (Residential, Commercial, Manufacturing, etc) noting all the development standards for any particular zone. Rather than have summary tables that are codified in the Zoning Ordinance, and therefore, more difficult to change when inaccuracies are found, the Community and Economic Development Department will use summary tables to help citizens and applicants in a more concise way, but the tables will not be codified. Master Plan Considerations: The proposed text amendments are essentially a matter of house keeping. The purpose of the proposal is to correct minor oversights in prior Zoning Ordinance revisions, eliminate conflicting information, and to provide clarity for current, perhaps ambiguous, Zoning Ordinance language. The proposed text revisions are for the purpose of maintaining, updating, and clarifying the Zoning Ordinance, and as such, are consistent with adopted City planning documents including Master Plans. PUBLIC PROCESS: An Open House was held on April 15, 2010. Notice of the Open House was sent to Community Council Chairpersons, business groups, and those whose names are on the Planning Division's list serve. Notice was also posted on the City's website. There were no comments received from the public related to the proposed text modifications. On December 8, 2010, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended that the petition be forwarded to the City Council for approval. The Planning Commission recommended a modification to Planning Staffs recommendation as noted in Item 5 above. Petitions PLNFCM2010-00064,Zoning Ordinance Fine Tuning—February 2010 Page 3 of 4 ow,* RELEVANT ORDINANCES: • State Law, Section 10-9a-204,Notice of Public Hearings and Public Meetings to Consider General Plan or Modifications • 21A.50.050 Standards for General Amendments—Amendment criteria and findings are outlined on pages four and five of the staff report which is included in the transmittal packet (Attachment 5B — Staff Report—December 9, 2009). • 21A.24— Residential Districts • 21A.26—Commercial Districts • 21A.28 — Manufacturing Districts • 21A.30— Downtown Districts • 21A.31 —Gateway Districts • 21A.32 — Special Purpose Districts • 21A.36 —General Provisions • 21A.46—Signs • 21A.60— List of Terms • 21A.62 —Definitions Petitions PLNPCM2010-00064,Zoning Ordinance Fine Tuning—February 2010 Page 4 of 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CHRONOLOGY 2. ORDINANCE 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 4. MAILING LABELS 5. PLANNING COMMISSION A) NEWSPAPER NOTICE AND MEETING NOTICE POSTMARK Newspaper Notice—November 24, 2010 Mailed Notice—November 24, 2010 B) STAFF REPORT December 8, 2010 C) AGENDA AND MINUTES December 8, 2010 6. ORIGINAL PETITION PROJECT CHRONOLOGY February 15, 2010 Petition delivered to the Planning Division. March 1, 2010 Petition assigned to Lex Traughber. March 17, 2010 Routed proposed text changes to City Departments/Divisions for review and comment. April 15, 2010 Planning Staff held an Open House. November 23, 2010 Planning Commission agenda posted on the Planning Division and Utah Public Meeting Notice websites. November 24, 2010 Newspaper notice published for the Planning Commission meeting on December 8, 2010. December 8, 2009 Planning Commission held a public hearing December 9, 2010 Planning Staff requested an ordinance from the City Attorney's Office. January 5, 2011 Received ordinance from the City Attorney's Office. January 12, 2011 Planning Commission ratified the minutes from their December 8, 2010, public hearing. January 18, 2011 Transmitted to Community & Economic Development. SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2011 (An ordinance amending certain land use provisions of Title 21A (Zoning) of the Salt Lake City Code) An ordinance amending certain sections of Title 21A (Zoning) of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2010-00064 to provide additional clarity and efficiency in land use regulation. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission ("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on December 8, 2010 to consider a request made by Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker (petition no. PLNPCM2010-00064) to amend the text of certain sections of Title 21A (Zoning) of the Salt Lake City Code to provide further clarity and efficiency in land use regulation; and WHEREAS, at its December 8, 2010 hearing, the Planning Commission voted in favor of recommending to the City Council that the City Council amend the sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code identified herein; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the City's best interests, NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code section 21A.36.020.B. That section 21A.36.020.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Conformance with Lot and Bulk Controls), including Table 21A.36.020B therein, shall be, and hereby is, amended to read as follows: B. Obstructions In Required Yards: Accessory uses and structures, and projections of the principal structure, may be located in a required yard only as indicated ("X") in table 21A.36.020B of this section. No portion of an obstruction authorized in table 21A.36.020B of this section shall extend beyond the authorized projection. Dimensions shall be measured from the finished surface of the building or structure. TABLE 21A.36.020B — OBSTRUCTIONS IN REQUIRED YARDS' '"° Front And Corner Side Rear Side Yard Yard Type Of Structure Or Use Obstruction Yards Accessory buildings subject to the X3 X provisions of chapter 21A.40 of this title, and located at least 1 foot from the side property line except for the FP and FR districts where no accessory building is permitted in any yard. Accessory buildings shall be at least 10 feet from a principal residential building on an adjacent lot. Arbors and trellises not to exceed 12 feet in X X X height or 120 square feet in residential districts. This requirement shall also apply to nonresidential districts unless otherwise w , authorized. Architectural ornament not elsewhere X X X regulated projecting not more than 4 inches Awnings and canopies, extending not more X X X than 21/, feet into front, corner side, or side yards and not more than 5 feet into rear yards allowed in residential districts only Balconies projecting not more than 5 feet X Basketball hoop and backboard on or X X X adjacent to permitted driveways Bay windows which are 1 story high, not X X X more than 10 feet long, project 2 feet or less and are located not less than 4 feet from a lot line Below grade encroachments2 X X X Breezeways and open porches X Central air conditioning systems, heating, X X ventilating, pool and filtering equipment, the outside elements shall be located not less than 4 feet from a lot line. Structures less than 4 feet from the property line shall be reviewed as a special exception according to the provisions of section 21A.52.030 of this title. Chimneys projecting 2 feet or less into the X X yard must be located not less than 2 feet from a lot line. Decks (open) 2 feet high or less X X X Eaves, not including gutters projecting 2 feet X X X or less into the yard. 4 foot eave may project into a 20 foot yard area. Fallout shelters (completely underground), X conforming to applicable civil defense regulations and located not less than 4 feet from a lot line Fences or walls subject to applicable height X X X restrictions of chapter 21 A.40 of this title Fire escapes projecting 4 feet or less X Flagpoles: Residential districts: 1 permanent flagpole X X X per street frontage Nonresidential districts: 3 flagpoles per X X X street frontage Subject to provisions of table 21A.36.020C of this section Grade changes of 2 feet or less except for the X X X FP and FR districts which shall be subject to the provisions of subsection 21 A.24.010P of this title. (All grade changes located on a property line shall be supported by a retaining wall.) Ground mounted utility boxes subject to the X X X provisions of section 21A.40.160 of this title Ham radio antennas subject to provisions of X subsection 21A.40.090D of this title Landscaping, including decorative berms 4 X X X feet or less in height with no grade change along any property line, provided that if such landscaping obstructs the visibility of an intersection the city may require its pruning or removal. Laundry drying equipment (clothesline and X poles) Parking, carports and covered parking spaces X except as otherwise expressly authorized by Amok table 21A.44.050 of this title Patios on grade X X X Patios on grade (attached, covered and X unenclosed) maintaining a minimum 15 foot setback from the rear property line Porches (attached, covered and unenclosed) X projecting 5 feet or less Recreational (playground) equipment X Refuse dumpster X Removable ramp for persons with X X X disabilities (when approved as a special exception) Satellite dish antennas X X Signs, subject to the provisions of chapter X X X 21A.46 of this title Steps and required landings 4 feet or less X X X above or below grade which are necessary for access to a permitted building and located not less than 4 feet from a lot line Swimming pools (measured to the water X X line), tennis courts, game courts, and similar uses shall not be located less than 10 feet from a property line. Window mounted refrigerated air X X X conditioners and evaporative "swamp" coolers located at least 2 feet from the property line. Window mounted refrigerated air conditioner units and "swamp" coolers less than 2 feet from the property line shall be reviewed as a special exception according to the provisions of section 21A.52.030 of this title. Window wells not over 6 feet in width and X X X projecting not more than 3 feet from structure Notes: 1."X" denotes where obstructions are allowed. 2.Below grade encroachments (encroachments which are completely below grade where the surface grade remains intact and where the below grade encroachment is not visible from the surface) into required yards shall be treated as a routine and uncontested matter in accordance with the procedures set forth in chapter 2l A.14 of this title. 3. The accessory structure shall be located wholly behind the primary structure on the property. SECTION 2. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code section 21 A.46.1 10.A.3.b. That section 21A.46.1 10.A.3.b of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown Districts), including the table therein, shall be, and hereby is, amended to read as follows: b. De-ta Center Sports Arena Located on the Block Between South Temple and 100 South between 300 and 400 West Streets: STANDARDS FOR THE DELTA CENTER SPORTS ARENA LOCATED ON THE BLOCK BETWEEN SOUTH TEMPLE AND 100 SOUTH BETWEEN 300 AND 400 - , WEST STREETS Maximum Limit On Height Of Number Of Combined Freestanding Minimum Types Of Signs Maximum Area Signs Permitted Number Of Signs' Setback2 Permitted Per Sign Face Per Sign Type Signs3 See note I May extend Awning/canopy 1 square foot 1 per first floor None 6 feet from signs per linear foot door/window face of of storefront building but (sign area only) not within 2 feet from back of curb' See note 1 n/a Canopy, drive- 40% of canopy 1 per canopy None through face if signage face is on 2 faces; 20% of canopy face if signs are on 4 faces 12 feet 5 feet Construction sign 64 square feet 1 per storefront None , See note 1 n/a Flat sign (general 4 square feet 1 per building None building per linear foot face orientation) of building faces See note 1 n/a Flat sign 2 square feet 3 per business None (storefront per linear foot storefront orientation) of each store frontage' See subsection See Marquee sign Subject only to 1 per storefront None 21 A.46.0700 subsection subsection of this chapter 21A.46.070 21A.46.0700 of 0 of this this chapter chapter 20 feet None Monument sign 1 square foot 1 per street 1 sign per per linear foot frontage street of street frontage frontage 8 square feet None Nameplate, 3 square feet 1 per building None building 12 feet 5 feet New development 200 square feet 1 per street None sign frontage 45 feet None, but Pole sign 1 square foot 1 per street 1 sign per shall not per linear foot frontage street extend of street frontage across a frontage; 200 property line square feet maximum for a single business, 300 square feet maximum for multiple businesses 8 feet 5 feet Political sign 32 square feet No limit None 4 feet 5 feet Private directional 8 square feet No limit None sign 6 square feet None Public safety sign 8 square feet No limit None 8 feet None Real estate sign 32 square feet 1 per street None frontage See note 1 n!a Roof signs 4 square feet 1 per street None per linear foot frontage of building face or 6 square feet per linear foot of building face on buildings taller than 100 feet No limit n!a Window sign 25% of total No limit None frontage window area per use 90% of total frontage window area (interior or exterior) for Delta Center Sports Arena events, not to exceed 3 months in duration for each calendar year 7 Notes: I.For height limits on building signs, see subsection 21A.46.070J of this chapter. 2.Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs. 3.The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined. 4.Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors. 5.A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign. 6.Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. 7.Verbiage and/or corporate logos are limited to on premises advertising of Delta Center Sports Arena events only and are limited to 10 percent of the window coverage. SECTION 3. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code section 21A.46.120.E.4.b. That section 21 A.46.120.E.4.b of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Special Purpose Districts), including the table therein, shall be, and hereby is, amended to read as follows: b. Standards For Tthe Franklin Quest Baseball Stadium Sports Stadium Located on the Southeast Corner of 1300 South and West Temple: Flat signs, construction signs, political signs, real estate signs, new development signs, window signs, public safety signs, and nameplates shall comply with the table for standards for the PL, PL-2 and I districts. The design, materials, and colors for all signs must be compatible with the Sports , Stadium on the corner of 1300 South and West Temple Franklin Quest baseball . stadium subject to the approval of the Salt Lake City urban design committee. Maximum Types Of Height Of Signs Maximum Area Freestanding Minimum Number Of Signs Permitted Permitted Per Sign Face Signs' Setback'' Awning 1 square foot per See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor door/window signs linear foot of feet from face of and not to extend beyond 1 awning building, 2 feet foot on each side of the door from back of or window width curb faces Monument 60 square feet of 8 feet 10 feet 1 per building frontage signs3'4 total sign face area including a base. The base shall be 25% of the sign height Pole signs 180 square feet per 30 feet No sign 1 pole sign which allows 4 (triangle gross sign face. 540 projection over sign panels per sign face, l of frame square feet for the the property line which may be an electronic structure) structure changeable copy sign4 and 1 Bt-rzz logo sign (12 total signs for the triangular pole sign) Private 8 square feet of 4 feet 2 feet behind 2 per driveway approach and directional total sign face area property lines as necessary for pedestrian signs3 including a base. direction The base shall be 25% of the sign height Notes: l.For limits on the height of building signs, see subsection 21A.46.070J of this chapter. 2.Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs. 3.Modified from the standards for the PL, PL-2 and I districts and required for the Fran ba ll sports stadium overlay district. 4.Electronic changeable copy signs shall only be permitted on arterial street frontages. Electronic changeable copy signs/panels shall not exceed 50 square feet. 5.Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. SECTION 4. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code section 21A.62.040. That section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions), shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to add the following definition of"pitched roof' to be inserted in alphabetical order into that section: PITCHED ROOF: The covering on the top of a structure, serving to protect against rain, snow, sunlight. wind, and extremes of temperature, having a minimum pitch or slope of a twp foot (2') rise over a twelve foot (12') run. SECTION 5. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code section 21 A.62.040. That section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions), shall be, and hereby is. amended, in pertinent part, to amend the definition of"fraternity/sorority house" as follows: FRATERNITY/SORORITY HOUSE: A building which is occupied only by a group of university or college students who receive lodging and/or meals on the premises in exchange for compensation. and are associated together in a fraternity/sorority that is officially recognized by the university or college n-el who receive from the fraternity sorority . SECTION 6. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code chapters 21A.24, 21A.26, 21A.28, 21 A.30, 21 A.31, and 21 A.32. That chapters 21 A.24, 21 A.26, 21 A.28, 21 A.30, 21 A.31, and 21A.32 of the Salt Lake City Code, shall be, and hereby are, amended to remove the text and tables of sections 21A.24.200; 21A.26.090; 21A.28.050; 21 A.30.060; 21 A.31.060; and 21 A.32.150 in their entirety. The codifier is instructed to replace the omitted text and tables of each of the sections identified herein with the parenthetical, "(omitted)". SECTION 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of 2011. CHAIRPERSON µ , ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2011 (An ordinance amending certain land use provisions of Title 21A (Zoning) of the Salt Lake City Code) An ordinance amending certain sections of Title 21A (Zoning) of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2010-00064 to provide additional clarity and efficiency in land use regulation. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission ("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on December 8, 2010 to consider a request made by Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker (petition no. PLNPCM2010-00064) to amend the text of certain sections of Title 21A (Zoning) of the Salt Lake City Code to provide further clarity and efficiency in land use regulation; and WHEREAS, at its December 8, 2010 hearing, the Planning Commission voted in favor of recommending to the City Council that the City Council amend the sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code identified herein; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the City's best interests, NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code section 21A.36.020.B. That section 21A.36.020.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Conformance with Lot and Bulk Controls), including Table 21A.36.020B therein, shall be, and hereby is, amended to read as follows: B. Obstructions In Required Yards: Accessory uses and structures, and projections of the principal structure, may be located in a required yard only as indicated ("X") in table 21A.36.020B of this section. No portion of an obstruction authorized in table 21A.36.020B of this section shall extend beyond the authorized projection. Dimensions shall be measured from the finished surface of the building or structure, TABLE 21A.36.020B —OBSTRUCTIONS IN REQUIRED YARDS AM* Front And Corner Side Rear Side Yard Yard Type Of Structure Or Use Obstruction Yards Accessory buildings subject to the X3 X provisions of chapter 21A.40 of this title, and located at least 1 foot from the side property line except for the FP and FR districts where no accessory building is permitted in any yard. Accessory buildings shall be at least 10 feet from a principal residential building on an adjacent lot. Arbors and trellises not to exceed 12 feet in X X X height or 120 square feet in residential districts. This requirement shall also apply to nonresidential districts unless otherwise authorized. Architectural ornament not elsewhere X X X regulated projecting not more than 4 inches Awnings and canopies, extending not more X X X than 2'/2 feet into front, corner side, or side yards and not more than 5 feet into rear yards allowed in residential districts only Balconies projecting not more than 5 feet X Basketball hoop and backboard on or X X X adjacent to permitted driveways Bay windows which are 1 story high, not X X X more than 10 feet long, project 2 feet or less and are located not less than 4 feet from a lot line Below grade encroachments2 X X X Breezeways and open porches X Central air conditioning systems, heating, X X ventilating, pool and filtering equipment, the outside elements shall be located not less than 4 feet from a lot line. Structures less than 4 feet from the property line shall be reviewed as a special exception according to the provisions of section 21A.52.030 of this title. • Chimneys projecting 2 feet or less into the X X yard must be located not less than 2 feet from a lot line. Decks (open) 2 feet high or less X X X Eaves, not including gutters projecting 2 feet X X X or less into the yard. 4 foot eave may project into a 20 foot yard area. Fallout shelters (completely underground), X conforming to applicable civil defense regulations and located not less than 4 feet from a lot line Fences or walls subject to applicable height X X X restrictions of chapter 21A.40 of this title Fire escapes projecting 4 feet or less X Flagpoles: Residential districts: 1 permanent flagpole X X X per street frontage Nonresidential districts: 3 flagpoles per X X X street frontage Subject to provisions of table 21A.36.020C of this section Grade changes of 2 feet or less except for the X X X FP and FR districts which shall be subject to the provisions of subsection 21A.24.010P of this title. (All grade changes located on a property line shall be supported by a retaining wall.) Ground mounted utility boxes subject to the X X X provisions of section 21A.40.160 of this title Ham radio antennas subject to provisions of X subsection 21A.40.090D of this title Landscaping, including decorative berms 4 X X X feet or less in height with no grade change along any property line, provided that if such landscaping obstructs the visibility of an intersection the city may require its pruning or removal. Laundry drying equipment (clothesline and X poles) Parking, carports and covered parking spaces X except as otherwise expressly authorized by table 21A.44.050 of this title Patios on grade X X X Patios on grade (attached, covered and X unenclosed) maintaining a minimum 15 foot setback from the rear property line Porches (attached, covered and unenclosed) X projecting 5 feet or less Recreational (playground) equipment X Refuse dumpster X Removable ramp for persons with X X X disabilities (when approved as a special exception) Satellite dish antennas X X Signs, subject to the provisions of chapter X X X 21A.46 of this title Steps and required landings 4 feet or less X X X above or below grade which are necessary for access to a permitted building and located not less than 4 feet from a lot line Swimming pools (measured to the water X X line), tennis courts, game courts, and similar uses shall not be located less than 10 feet from a property line. Window mounted refrigerated air X X X conditioners and evaporative "swamp" coolers located at least 2 feet from the property line. Window mounted refrigerated air conditioner units and "swamp" coolers less than 2 feet from the property line shall be reviewed as a special exception according to the provisions of section 21A.52.030 of this title. Window wells not over 6 feet in width and X X X projecting not more than 3 feet from structure Notes: 1."X" denotes where obstructions are allowed. 2.Below grade encroachments (encroachments which are completely below grade where the surface grade remains intact and where the below grade encroachment is not visible from the surface) into required yards shall he treated a a routine and uncontested matter in accordance with the procedures set forth in chapter 21A.14 of this title. 3.The accessory structure shall be located wholly behind the primary structure on the property. SECTION 2. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code section 21 A.46.110.A.3.b. That section 21 A.46.1 10.A.3.b of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown Districts), including the table therein, shall be, and hereby is, amended to read as follows: b. Sports Arena Located on the Block Between South Temple and 100 South between 300 and 400 West Streets: STANDARDS FOR THE SPORTS ARENA LOCATED ON THE BLOCK BETWEEN SOUTH TEMPLE AND 100 SOUTH BETWEEN 300 AND 400 WEST STREETS Maximum Limit On Height Of 3 Number Of Combined ;Freestanding Minimum Types Of Signs ;Maximum Area ;Signs Permitted Number Of ,Signs' Setback2 :Permitted Per Sign Face Per Sign Type Signs' See note 1 May extend Awning/canopy 1 square foot 1 per first floor None 6 feet from signs per linear foot door/window face of of storefront building but (sign area only) not within 2 feet from back of curb6 See note l n/a Canopy, drive- ' 40% of canopy 1 per canopy None through face if signage face is on 2 faces; 20% of canopy r face if signs are on 4 faces 12 feet 5 feet Construction sign 64 square feet 1 per storefront None See note 1 n/a Flat sign(general " 4 square feet 1 per building None building ' per linear foot face orientation) ; of building face5 See note 1 n/a Flat sign 2 square feet 3 per business None (storefront , per linear foot storefront orientation)4 ' of each store frontage' See subsection See Marquee sign , Subject only to 1 per storefront None 21A.46.0700 subsection ' subsection of this chapter 21A.46.070 21A.46.0700 of 0 of this ; this chapter chapter , 20 feet None Monument sign 1 square foot 1 per street ' 1 sign per per linear foot frontage street of street frontage frontage S square feet None Nameplate, 3 square feet 1 per building None building ; 12 feet 5 feet New development 200 square feet 1 per street None sign frontage 45 feet None, but Pole sign : 1 square foot 1 per street 1 sign per shall not per linear foot frontage street extend , of street frontage across a , frontage; 200 property line square feet maximum for a single business, 300 square feet maximum for • multiple businesses 8 feet 5 feet Political sign 32 square feet No limit None 4 feet 5 feet Private directional ` 8 square feet No limit None sign 6 square feet None Public safety sign • 8 square feet No limit None 8 feet None Real estate sign 32 square feet 1 per street None frontage See note 1 n/a Roof signs . 4 square feet 1 per street None per linear foot frontage of building face or 6 square feet per linear foot of building face on buildings • taller than 100 feet No limit n/a Window sign ! 25% of total No limit None frontage window area per use 90% of total frontage window area (interior or exterior) for Sports Arena events, not to exceed 3 months in duration for each calendar year 7 Notes: 1.For height limits on building signs, see subsection 21A.46.070J of this chapter. 2.Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs. 3.The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined. 4.Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors. 5.A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign. 6.Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. 7.Verbiage and/or corporate logos are limited to on premises advertising of Sports Arena events only and .* are limited to 10 percent of the window coverage. SECTION 3. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code section 21A.46.120.E.4.b. That section 21A.46.120.E.4.b of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Special Purpose Districts), including the table therein, shall be, and hereby is, amended to read as follows: b. Standards For the Sports Stadium Located on the Southeast Corner of 1300 South and West Temple: Flat signs, construction signs, political signs, real estate signs, new development signs, window signs, public safety signs, and nameplates shall comply with the table for standards for the PL, PL-2 and I districts. The design, materials, and colors for all signs must be compatible with the Sports Stadium on the corner of 1300 South and West Temple subject to the approval of the Salt Lake City urban design committee. Maximum Types Of Height Of Signs Maximum Area Freestanding Minimum Number Of Signs Permitted Per Sign Face :Signs' Setback2 Permitted Awning '1 square foot per See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor door/window signs linear foot of feet from face of and not to extend beyond 1 awning building, 2 feet foot on each side of the door from back of or window width curb face' Monument 60 square feet of 8 feet 10 feet 1 per building frontage signs34 total sign face area including a base. The base shall be 25% of the sign height Pole signs 180 square feet per 30 feet No sign 1 pole sign which allows 4 (triangle gross sign face. 540 projection over sign panels per sign face, 1 of frame square feet for the ,the property line which may be an electronic structure) structure changeable copy sign' and 1 logo sign (12 total signs for the triangular pole sign) Private 8 square feet of '4 feet 2 feet behind 2 per driveway approach and directional total sign face area property lines as necessary for pedestrian signs3 including a base. direction The base shall be 25% of the sign height Notes: 1.For lints on the height of building signs, see subsection 21A.46.070J of this chapter. 2.Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs. 3.Modified from the standards for the PL,PL-2 and I districts and required for the sports stadium overlay district. 4.Electronic changeable copy signs shall only be permitted on arterial street frontages. Electronic changeable copy signs/panels shall not exceed 50 square feet. 5.Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. SECTION 4. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code section 21A.62.040. That section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions), shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to add the following definition of"pitched roof' to be inserted in alphabetical order into that section: PITCHED ROOF: The covering on the top of a structure, serving to protect against rain, snow, sunlight, wind, and extremes of temperature, having a minimum pitch or slope of a twp foot (2') rise over a twelve foot (12') run. SECTION 5. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code section 21A.62.040. That section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions), shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to amend the definition of"fraternity/sorority house" as follows: FRATERNITY/SORORITY HOUSE: A building which is occupied only by a group of university or college students who receive lodging and/or meals on the premises in exchange for compensation, and are associated together in a fraternity/sorority that is officially recognized by the university or college. SECTION 6. Amending text of Salt Lake City Code chapters 21A.24, 21 A.26, 21A.28, 21 A.30, 21 A.31, and 21 A.32. That chapters 21 A.24, 21 A.26, 21 A.28, 21 A.30, 21 A.31, and 21A.32 of the Salt Lake City Code, shall be, and hereby are, amended to remove the text and tables of sections 21 A.24.200; 21A.26.090; 21A.28.050; 21A.30.060; 21 A.31.060; and 21A.32.150 in their entirety. The codifier is instructed to replace the omitted text and tables of each of the sections identified herein with the parenthetical, "(omitted)". SECTION 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of 2011. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date: CITY RECORDER By: P ul C.Niels u..Se ti r Czy Attorney (SEAL) Bill No. of 2011. Published: HB ATTY--16055-s2-Ordinance - Zoning Fine Tuning PLNPCN120I0-00064.DOC NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering petition PLNPCM2010-00064, a request by Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker to analyze and adjust the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance (Title 21) to provide for clarity and efficiency of use as part of a code maintenance program. The subject Petition addresses several minor fine tuning text amendments that would apply citywide if adopted by the City Council. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Room 315 City & County Building 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Lex Traughber at (801) 535-6184 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at 1ex.trauizhber a slcgov.com People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to attend this hearing. Accommodations may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids. This is an accessible facility. For questions, requests, or additional information, please contact the Planning Division at (801) 535-7757; TDD (801) 535- 6021. KEVIN JONES PETE TAYLOR ANGIE VORHER EAST BENCH CHAIR SUNNYSIDE EAST JORDAN MEADOWS CHAIR 2500 SKYLINE DRIVE 933 SOUTH 2300 EAST 1988 SIR JAMES DRIVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84108 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84108 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 GORDON STORRS ELLEN REDDICK RANDY SORENSON FAIRPARK CHAIR BONNEVILLE HILLS CHAIR GLENDALE CHAIR 159 NORTH 1320 WEST 2177 ROOSEVELT AVENUE 1184 SOUTH REDWOOD DR SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 SLAT LAKE CITY UT 84104 PHILIP CARLSON ESTHER HUNTER BILL DAVIS SUGAR HOUSE CHAIR UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD BALL PARK CHAIR 1917 EAST 2700 SOUTH 1049 NORRIS PLACE 332 WEST 1700 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TERRY THOMAS VACANT WESTPOINT CHAIR FOOTHILL/SUNNYSIDE CHAIR 1840 STALLION LANE SALT LAKE CITY UT SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 D. CHRISTIAN HARRISON JIM JENKIN DOWNTOWN CHAIR GREATER AVENUES CHAIR 336 WEST BROADWAY,#308 PO BOX 1679 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84110 DEWITT SMITH GARY FELT LIBERTY WELLS EAST CENTRAL CHAIR 328 EAST HOLLYWOOD AVE P.O. BOX 521809 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84115 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84152 LISETTE GIBBONS MIKE HARMAN YALECREST CHAIR POPLAR GROVE CHAIR 1764 HUBBARD AVE 1044 WEST 300 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84108 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 BEVERLY NELSON RON JARRETT FEDERAL HEIGHTS ROSE PARK CHAIR 26 SOUTH WOLCOTT STREET 1441 WEST SUNSET DRIVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 PAMELA PEDERSEN EAST LIBERTY PARK KATHERINE GARDNER SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DIST. CAPITOL HILL CHAIR 440 EAST100 SOUTH 606 DE SOTO STREET SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111 SALT LAKE CITY, UT. 84103 MARK BRINTON THOMAS MUTTER WASATCH HOLLOW CENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD 1869 LOGAN AVE COUNCIL CHAIR SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84108 228 EAST 500 SOUTH#100 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111 Downtown Alliance Attn: Carol Dibble Salt Lake Chamber of Commerce Bob Farrington, Director Downtown Merchants Association 175 East 400 South, Suite#600 175 East 400 South 4600 10 West Broadway, Suite 420 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Sugar House Merchants Association Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Vest Pocket Business Coalition C/O Barbara Green PO Box 1805 PO Box 521357 Smith-Crown Salt Lake City, UT 84110 Salt Lake City, Utah 84152-1357 2000 South 1100 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 Westside Alliance C/O Neighborhood Housing Services Maria Garcia 622 West 500 North Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 Updated 10/05/04 KDC 5. PLANNING COMMISSION A. Newspaper Notice and Postmark Newspaper Notice — November 24, 2010 Mailed Notice — November 24, 2010 Remit to: P.O. Box 704005 Zhe$nit fake Zribune MEDIA• Gte Deseret News West Valley City, UT 84170 Order Confirmation for Ad #0000637360-01 Client PLANNING DIVISION Payor Customer PLANNING DIVISION Ad Content Proof Actual Size Client Phone 801-535-6184 Payor Phone 801-535-6184 SALT COMMISSION LANKING TONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT HEARING Account# 9001394298 Payor Account 9001394298 On Wednesday, Decem- ber 8, 2010, at 5.45 P.M., the Salt Lake Ory Address PO BOX 145480 Payor Address PO BOX 145480 Planning Commission will SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114-5455 USA SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114-5455 hold a en hand to lake commmment and con. side' Petition PLNPCM2010-00064, a Ordered Byrequest by Salt Lake Oty Acct.Exec Mayor Ralph Becker to Fax analyze and adjust the EMail everett joyce©slcgov.com Lex jvaldez Salt Lake (TikeCityOrdinnle 21 nig provide for clarity and Total Amount efficiency of use as part $76.25 of a code maintenance program. The subject Payment Amt $0.00 Petition `s`fine tuning sever- Tear Sheets Proofs Affidavits al minor flue text amendments that would apply citywide It adopt- Amount Due $76.25 0 0 1 lid by the City Council. All persons Interested and present will be given Payment Method PO Number PLNPCM2010-00064 an oppoitunity to be heard in this marten. The Confirmation Notes: hearing will be held In Room 326 of the Salt Text: Lake City and County Building,451 South Store Street. Accessible paik- Ad Type Ad Size Color ing and entrance are lo. cared on the east side of Legal Liner 1.0 X 57 Li <NONE> the building. Hearing in,. pail ed Individuals who wish to attend this meet. log should contact out Product Placement TOD set vice nambor, (801) 535.6220, foul ^,seret News:: Legal Liner Notice-0998 days In advance so that an interpreter can be ,eduled Date(s): 11/24/2010 IIovided. Far further in- fxormaricn ne arci;cg this Product Placement healing, caii Lex Traughber at IHCII 535- sltrib.com:: LegalNotice- 6373 Liner 0998 bl s6 60 UPAXLP Scheduled Date(s): 11/24/2010 Product Placement utahlegals.com:: utahlegals.com Scheduled Date(s): 11/24/2010 11/10/2010 1:01:21PM 1 7. PLNPCM2O1O-00064, Fine luninq Zoning Amendments - A request by oalt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker to analyze and adjust the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance (Title 21) to provide for clarity and efficiency of use as part of a code maintenance program. The subject Petition addresses several minor fine tuning text amendments that would apply citywide if adopted by the City Council. (Staff contact: Lex Traughber at 801.535.6184 or lex.traughber@slcgov.com). The files for the above items are available in the Planning Division offices,room 406 of the City and County Building. Please contact the staff planner for information,Visit the Planning Division's tvebsite at www.slcgov.com/CED/planning for copies of the Planning Commission agendas,staff reports,and minutes.Staff Reports will be posted the Friday prior to the meeting and minutes will be posted two days after they are ratified,which usually occurs at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission.Planning Commission Meetings may be watched live on SLCTV Channel 17;past meetings are recorded and archived,and may be viewed at www.slctv.coni INFORMATION TO APPLICANTS AND CITIZENS 1. Attendance:Applicant or representative must be present during tl will not be reviewed. 2. Decision Making Process:Planning Commission will review one c .ceive information from the applicant,professional staff,adjoining neighbors and citizens.After reviewing the case,the Planning Corm,. .oerate on the case in executive session.No additional testimony will be accepted during the executive session,unless requested by the Commissn,......clarification purposes.The Planning Commission will make their decision by making a motion,second,discussion and majority vote by the Commission. 3. Appeals process:Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Planning Commission may appeal that decision to the Salt Lake City Land Use Appeals Board within thirty(10)days after the Planning Commission final decision. 4. Meeting notices:Meeting notices are made available 12days in advance.If persons wish to submit written comments they should be directed to the Planning Commission or Planning Staff member indicated at least 7 days in advance to enable the Commissioners to consider those written comments.Comments should be sent to: Salt Lake City Planning Commission PO Box 145480 Salt Lake City,UT 84114-5480 AM Physical Address:451 S State Street,Room 406 Salt Lake City,UT 84111 ° . NOTE: Please turn off cellular phones during the meeting.We comply with :Ill AD.^.guidelines-People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to attend this meeting. Accommodations may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids. This is an accessible facility. For questions, requests, or additional information, please contact the Planning Commission Secretary at 535-6171 regarding this agenda or ADA accommodations.TDD 535-6220. - —Salt Lake City Planning Commission 451 S State Street, Room 406 PO Box 145480 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 5480 =;;':t,, RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED l,,.`:-- NOTICE OF HEARING ` :3 � i`�' 1-1r40"t01�� V (b Salt Lake City Planning DivisiUI I 4.51 S Spate Street Room 406 PO Box 14-5480 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5480 SALT LAL E CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEI x'ING AGENDA In Room 326 of the City&County Building at 451 South State Street Wednesday,December S, 2010 at 6:30 p.m.or immediately following the Work Session The field trip is scheduled to leave at 4:00 p.m. Dinner will be served to the Planning Commissioners and Staff at 5:00p.m. in Room 126. Work Session: 5:30 in Room 326. The Planning Commission will hold a work session from approximately 5:30-6:30. During the Work Session the Planning Staff will brief the Planning Commission on pending projects, discuss project updates and minor administrative matters. This portion of the meeting is open to the public for observation. 1. Mayor Ralph Becker to meet with the Planning Commission to discuss various matters including his Vision for a Green City 2. Clarion Associates will discuss the progress of the Sustainable City Code Initiative project (Staff contact: Cheri Coffey at 801-535-6188 or cheri.coffey@slcgov.com. 3. Discussion about proposed changes to Outdoor Advertising regulations (Staff contact: Doug Dansie at 801-535-6182 or doua.dansie©s!caov.com ▪ Approval of Minutes 9 Report of the Chair and Vice Chair O Report of the Director • Public Hearing 6:30 or immediately following the work session 1. PLNPCM2O1O-00610: Mark Miller Conditional use for auto sales- A request by Mark Miller Toyota to expand its current facility located at approximately 730 South West Temple. The property is zoned D-2 Downtown Support District in City Council District 4, represented by Luke Garrott (Staff contact: John Anderson at 801-535-7214 or john.anderson@slcgov.com). 2. PLNPCM2O10-00672 Harmon's Grocery Store Planned Development - A request by Harmons Grocery for a planned development of a grocery store at approximately 1706 E 1300 South in the CN (Neighborhood Commercial),zoning district and in City Council District 6, represented by JT Martin. The planned development request includes modifications to building and parking setbacks, fence regulations and sign regulations. (Staff contact: Elizabeth Reining at 801-535-6313 or elizabeth.reining@slcgov.com). 3. P LNPCM29?0-0056I. Neff Rezoninel. A request by Jeremy Neff for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone property located at approximately 163 West 1700 South from Community Business to General Commercial in order to bring the property and-its use into conformance with the zoning district and to match the zoning of the adjacent property which is also owned by the applicant. The proposed zoning district is CG (General Commercial) and is located in Council District 5, represented by Jill Remington-Love. (Staff contact: Maryann Pickering at 801-535-7660 or maryann.pickering@slcgov.com). 4. PLNP_CP.12.0:10L-00594:.Phillips_Conditional Use forma Office/Recception_Cente r_in a Landmark site_-_A request by Bonnie Phillips for a conditional use to allow a reception center at approximately 1229 East South Temple. The purpose of the proposal is to allow space for small gatherings and meetings that foster respectful dialogue, understanding and community discussions. The property is zoned Special Development Pattern SR1-A and is located in Council District 3, represented by Stan Penfold. (Staff contact: Ray Milliner (801)535-7645 or ray.milliner@slcgov.com). 5. PLNPCM20`1 O-0O300 Sentry Electric Fence Security Systems Text Amendment - A request by Michael Pate for Sentry Security Systems to amend Chapter 21A.40.120 of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. The amendment would add language to regulate the use of electric security fences in Manufacturing and Commercial zones. Changes would be City wide. (Staff contact: Ray Milliner at 801-535-7645 or ray.mil liner©slcgov.corn). 6. PLNSLIi32OI0-006-D2, Mt. Olivet/Roland Hall m St, Mark's School Subdivision - Guy Kroesche, Stoel & Rives, LLP, representing Rowland Hall - St Mark's School, is requesting subdivision approval of the property located at approximately 1443 E. Sunnyside Avenue. Proposed are two (2) parcels; one (1) parcel of approximately 13.087 acres in size (the "RHSM Parcel"), and one (1) parcel of approximately 28.4 i6 acres in size (the "Revised Mt. Olivet Parcel"). This subdivision request is a result of City Council action amending the East Bench Master Plan and rezoning the subject property from Open Space (OS) to include Institutional (I) for the RHSM parcel pursuant to Salt Lake City Ordinance number 21 of 2006. The subject parcel is located in City Council District Six represented by J.T. Martin. (Staff contact: Lex Traughber at S01.535.6184 or lex.traughber©slcgov.com). PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT of�L �- Salt Lake City Code Maintenance Fine Tuning Zoning Text Amendments F�f ig. IJl PLNPCM2010-00064 ri Planning and Zoning Division Decem ber 8, 2010 Department of Community and Economic Development Applicant: Mayor Ralph Becker Staff: Lex Traughber Request (801)535-6184 Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker is requesting that the Planning Lex.Traughber@slcgov.com slcgov,com Commission analyze and adjust the Zoning Ordinance to provide for clarity and efficiency of use as part of a code maintenance program, The following Tax ID: N/A minor fine tuning text amendments are proposed: Current Zone: N/A 1, Chapter 21.A36—General Provisions, Table 21 A,36.020B — Obstructions in Required Yards: Allow an accessory structure in the Master Plan: City-wide side yard setback where said structure is located wholly behind the primary structure. Council District: City-wide 2. Chapter 21A.46 -Signs, Section 21A.46.110(A)(3)(b)— Sign Lot Size: N/A Regulations for Downtown Districts: Change the "Delta Center" sub- section title and the"Standards for the Delta Center" sign overlay to a Current Use: N/A generic sub-section title and standards for the sports arena located on the block between South Temple and 100 South between 300 and 400 Applicable Land Use West Streets. Regulations: Review Standards: 3, Chapter 21A.46— Signs, Section 21A,46.120(E)(4)(b)— 21A.50,050—Standards for General 21A,46.120(E)(4)(b)—Sign Regulations For The UI, PL, PL-2, I And Amendments OS Districts: Change the name "Standards for the Franklin Quest Baseball Stadium" sign overlay to "Standards for the Sports Stadium Affected Text: located on the southeast corner of 1300 South and West Temple." 21A.24—Residential Districts p 4. Chapter 21 A.60—List of Terms, Section 21 A,60,020— List of Defined 21A.26—Commercial Districts 21A.28—Manufacturing Districts Terms: Add "Pitched Roof'to the alphabetical list of defined teens. 21A.30—Downtown Districts 5. Chapter 21A,62—Definitions, Section 21A.62,040— Definitions of 21A,31 —Gateway Districts Terms: Clarify in the definition that Fraternities and Sororities must 21A.32—Special Purpose Districts have a national affiliation in order to be considered as a Fraternity or 21A,36—General Provisions 21A.46—Signs Sorority as it pertains to the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance, 21 A,60—List of Terms 6, Chapter 21 A.62—Definitions, Section 21A.62.040—Definition of 21 A.62—Definitions Terms: Create a definition for"Pitched Roof' to be a roof with a minimum of a two foot(2') rise over a twelve foot (12') run. Notification 7, Eliminate the "Summary Tables of Yard and Bulk Requirements" for • N�o]e0mailed on November 23, the various use district chapters throughout the Zoning Ordinance as • Agenda posted on the Planning follows: Division and Utah Public Meeting Notice websites November 23, Chapter 21A.24 —Residential Districts, Table 21A.24.200 2010 PLNPCM2010.00064,rue Tuning Zoning Te-et Amendment Published Dale: December 8,2010 1 • Newspaper Notice November 24, Chapter 21A.26—Commercial Districts, Table 21A.26.090 2010 Chapter 21A.28—Manufacturing Districts, Table 21A.28.050 Attachments: Chapter 21A.30—Downtown Districts, Table 21A,30.060 Exhibit A—Proposed Ordinance Chapter 21 A,31 —Gateway Districts, Table 21 A,31,060 Amendments Chapter 21A.32—Special Purpose Districts, Table 21 A.32,150 Exhibit B—Dept/Division Comments Staff Recommendation Based on the findings listed in the staff report, it is the Planning Staff's opinion that overall the project generally meets the applicable standards and therefore, recommends the Planning Commission transmit a favorable recommendation to the City Council. Background Project Description The City adopted a comprehensive Zoning Ordinance in April 1995. At that time, it was understood that adjustments to the Zoning Ordinance would be necessary once it had been implemented and people had an opportunity to work with it. Salt Lake City intermittently processes Fine Tuning ordinance adjustments to provide code maintenance for the City's ordinances. Overall, the framework and structure of Salt Lake City's zoning regulations and development standards are sound and do not require wholesale restructuring. However, at times, code changes are processed due to land use policy changes adopted by the City or because of State enabling regulation changes. It would be beneficia for Salt Lake City to make minor code revisions that lead to a greater ease of use and understanding, Amendments to the City Code selected for Fine Tuning processing meet the following objectives: • Improves the clarity and usability of the Zoning Code without changing the intent behind the specific regulation in question, and clarifies wording that may be open to interpretation; • Addresses ongoing problems with administration of the existing Code language, and may result in a minor policy change of low significance; • Implements the City's Comprehensive Plan: and • Provides ordinance consistency with existing policies and objectives. Proposed Code Changes The Salt Lake Planning Division is processing specific adjustments to the Salt Lake City Code, The minor Fine Tuning text amendments being processed with this petition are discussed below. Item 1. Chapter 21,A36—General Provisions,Table 21A.36.020B—Obstructions in Required Yards: Allow an accessory structure in the side yard setback where said structure is located wholly behind the primary structure, Discussion: This provision would allow an accessory structure to be located behind the primary structure on a given parcel, but not necessarily within the rear yard setback unless otherwise precluded by the specific zoning district. PLNPCM2010.00064,Fine Tuning Zoning Text Amendment Published Date: December 8,2010 2 • Recommended Code Changes: Indicate in Table 21A.36,020B that accessory structures are allowed in the side yard setback, Make reference to an additional footnote to the table indicating that an accessory structure that is proposed to be located in a side yard setback must be wholly located behind the primary structure on the property, Item 2. Chapter 21A.46—Signs, Section 21A.46.110(A)(3)(b)—Sign Regulations for Downtown Districts: Change the "Delta Center" sub-section title and the "Standards for the Delta Center" sign overlay to a generic sub-section title and standards for the sports arena located on the block between South Temple and 100 South between 300 and 400 West Streets. Discussion: The name of the actual arena has changed and may change again in the future, Rather than providing a specific building name in the Zoning Ordinance, it is proposed to describe the building and its location, This action will prevent the need for future text amendments as they relate to the arena. Recommended Code Change: Modify the text of Section 21 A.46,110(A)(3)(b) to eliminate the reference to the Delta Center and include text to refer to this particular building as the sports arena located on the block between South Temple and 100 South between 300 and 400 West Streets. Item 3. Chapter 21A.46—Signs, Section 21A.46.120(E)(4)(b)—Sign Regulations For The UI, PL, PL-2, I And OS Districts: Change the name "Standards for the Franklin Quest Baseball Stadium" sign overlay to "Standards for the Sports Stadium located on the southeast corner of 1300 South and West Temple." Discussion: The name of the actual baseball stadium has changed and may change again in the future. Rather than providing a specific building name, it is proposed to describe the building and its location, This action will prevent the need for future text amendments as they relate to the stadium, Recommended Code Change: Modify the text of Section 21A,46.120(E)(4)(b) to eliminate the reference to the Franklin Quest Baseball Stadium and include text to refer to this particular building as the sports arena located on the block between South Temple and 100 South between 300 and 400 West Streets. Item 4. Chapter 21A,60 —List of Terms, Section 21A.60.020—List of Defined Terms: Pitched Roof. Discussion: If a definition for"Pitched Roof" is adopted and included in Chapter 21A,62 —Definitions, reference should be made to this defined term in Chapter 21 A,60—List of Terms, Recommended Code Change: Add "Pitched Roof' to the alphabetical list of defined terms. Item 5. Chapter 21A.62 —Definitions, Section 21A.62.040—Definitions of Terms: Clarify in the definitions chapter that Fraternities and Sororities must have a national affiliation in order to be considered as a Fraternity or Sorority as it pertains to the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. Discussion: This text amendment would provide consistency with the current regulations of the University of Utah, which requires a national affiliation in order to become a Fraternity or Sorority of the University. Recommended Code Change: Revise the definition for "Fraternity/Sorority House" in Chapter 21A.62 — Definitions, by adding text to the definition language that requires a national affiliation in order to become a Fraternity or Sorority of the college or University. PLNPCM2010-0006-1,Fine Tuning Zoning Text Amendment Published Date: December S,2010 3 Item 6. Chapter 21A.62—Definitions, Section 21A,62,040—Definitions of Terms: Create a definition for "Pitched Roof'to be a roof with a minimum of a two foot(2') rise over a twelve foot (12')run, and add "Pitched Roof' to the alphabetized list of defined terms, Discussion: The lack of this definition in the Zoning Ordinance has been an ongoing issue in determining the height of a structure, especially as it relates to the height regulations for single-family and two family zoning districts. Recommended Code Change: Adopt the following definition for"Pitched Roof' for Zoning Ordinance clarification purposes: PITCHED ROOF: The covering on the top of a structure, serving to protect against rain, snow, sunlight, wind, and extremes of temperature, having a minimum pitch or slope of a two foot (2') rise over a twelve foot(12') run. Item 7. Eliminate the "Summary Tables of Yard and Bulk Requirements" for the various use district chapters throughout the Zoning Ordinance as follows: Chapter 21A.24—Residential Districts, Table 21A.24.200 Chapter 21A.26— Commercial Districts, Table 21A.26.090 Chapter 21A.28—Manufacturing Districts, Table 21A.28.050 Chapter 21A.30—Downtown Districts, Table 21A.30.060 Chapter 21A.31 — Gateway Districts,Table 21A.31.060 Chapter 21A.32—Special Purpose Districts, Table 21A.32.150 Discussion: In the past, the summary tables have not been routinely amended and updated as necessary to reflect the specific changes to the lot and bulk regulations for various zoning districts. In addition, the summaries found in the tables are not always specific enough to accurately portray the regulations; in other words they are simply a summary and not a comprehensive table. Comprehensive zoning information is located in each Chapter(Residential, Commercial, Manufacturing, etc) noting all the development standards for any particular zone, Rather than have summary tables that are codified in the Zoning Ordinance, and therefore more difficult to change when inaccuracies are found, the Community and Economic Development Department will use summary tables to help citizens and applicants in a more concise way, but the tables will not be codified. The Building Services Division asserts that the tables should remain in the Code in their correspondence dated October 27, 2010. They indicated that the tables are often used as a handout for the public to relay zoning information. Planning Staff supports having convenient handouts for the public, but asserts that the handouts should consist of"complete" information, as opposed to a summary, and furthermore should be accurate. Incomplete and inaccurate information distributed to the public has little benefit for any of the parties involved in such an exchange. The most complete and accurate information to distribute to the public would be the actual adopted Zoning Ordinance text. Planning Staff therefore recommends that the codified"Summary Tables" be eliminated, and summary handouts developed for distribution to the public. Summary handouts could then be changed and updated to reflect City Council action as often as necessary. Recommended Code Change: Eliminate these tables in their entirety. PLNPCM2010-00064,Fine Tuning Zoning Text Amendment Published Date: December 8,2010 4 Comments Public Comments An Open House was held on April 15, 2010, Notice of the Open House was sent to Community Council Chairpersons, Business Groups, and those whose names are on the Planning Division's list serve. Notice was also posted on the City's website. There were no comments received from the public related to the proposed text modifications. City Department Comments The Planning Division routed a request for Department/Divisions comments on March 17, 2010. Several comments were received and are attached for review(Exhibit B), In general,there were no concerns for the proposed changes. The Building Services/Permits Office requested a subsequent review of the proposed ordinance language in their original comments dated April 2, 2010. Follow-up review and comments dated October 27, 2010, noted the desire to have the "Summary Tables of Yard and Bulk Requirements" remain in the ordinance for ease of distribution to the public. Analysis and Findings Options Approval: If the Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the standards of the ordinance as discussed below, the petition should be forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. Denial: If the Planning Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the standards of the ordinance as discussed below, the petition should be forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation of denial. Continuation: If the Planning Commission finds that additional information or further revision is needed in order to make a decision, then a final decision may be postponed with specific direction to Planning Staff regarding the additional information or revision required for the Planning Commission to take future action. Findings Section 21A.50.050 Standards for general amendments, A decision to amend the text of this title or the zoning map by general amendment is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the City Council and is not controlled by any one standard. A. In making its decision concerning a proposed text amendment, the City Council should consider the following factors: PI.NPCM20I0.00064,Pin::Tuning Zoning Text Amendment Published Date: December 8,2010 5 1. Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and polici of the City as stated through its various adopted planning documents; Discussion: The proposed text amendments are essentially a matter of house keeping. The purpose of the proposal is to correct minor oversights in prior Zoning Ordinance revisions, eliminate conflicting information, and to provide clarity for current, perhaps ambiguous, Zoning Ordinance language. Finding: The proposed text revisions are for the purpose of maintaining, updating, and clarifying the Zoning Ordinance, and as such are consistent with adopted City planning documents, 2. Whether a proposed text amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance; Discussion: Chapter 21A.46, addressing"Signs", is the only chapter among the various proposed text revisions that includes a"Purpose Statement", Section 21A.46.101 reads as follows: Purpose: The regulations of this chapter are intended to: 1, Eliminate potential hazards to motorists and pedestrians by requiring that signs are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that promotes the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City; 2. Encourage signs which, by their good design, are integrated with and harmonious to the buildings and sites, including landscaping, which they occupy; 3. Encourage sign legibility through the elimination of excessive and confusing sign displays; 4, Preserve and improve the appearance of the city as a place in which to live and to work, and create an attraction to nonresidents to come to visit or trade; 5. Allow each individual business to clearly identify itself and the nature of its business in such a manner as to become the hallmark of the business which will create a distinctive appearance and also enhance the city's character; 6. Safeguard and enhance property values; 7. Protect public and private investment in buildings and open space; and 8. Permit on premises signs as provided by the specific zoning district sign regulations included in this chapter. (Ord. 13-04 § 22, 2004: Ord, 88-95 § 1 (Exh, A), 1995) Finding: The proposed text amendment to refer to the Delta Center and the Franklin Quest Baseball Stadium by their location, rather than a sponsor, furthers the specific purpose statements for Chapter 21A.46— Signs. 3, Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards; and PLNPCM2010-00064,Fine Tuning Zoning Text Amendment Published Date: December 8,2010 6 Finding: The proposed text amendments do not affect any overlay zoning districts, Any specific development proposal would have to comply with applicable Overlay Zone requirements. • • 4. The extent to which a proposed text amendment implements best current, professional practices of urban planning and design. Analysis: The framework and structure of Salt Lake City's zoning regulations and development standards are sound and do not require wholesale restructuring, IIowever, at times code changes are processed due to land use policy changes adopted by the City or because of State enabling regulation changes. It would be beneficial for Salt Lake City to make minor code revisions that lead to a greater ease of use and understanding, Finding: The proposed changes are a matter of code maintenance and as such implement the best current, professional practices of urban planning and design. PLNPCM120I0-00064,Fine Tuning Zoning Text Amendment Published Date: December 0,2010 7 Petition PLNPCM2010-00064, Proposed Ordinance Amendments Chapter 21.A36 — General Provisions, Table 21A.36.020B — Obstructions in Required Yards: TABLE 21A.36.020B — OBSTRUCTIONS IN REQUIRED YARDS' I s Front q And ' 1 Corner Side Rear 1 Side Yard Yard Type Of Structure Or Use Obstruction ; Yards f Accessory buildings subject to the provisions of X3 X 1 chapter 21A.40 of this title, and located at least 1 j< foot from the side property line except for the FP and FR districts where no accessory building is permitted , 1 in any yard. Accessory buildings shall be at least 10 feet from a principal residential building on an 4 adjacent lot. 1 Arbors and trellises not to exceed 12 feet in height or X X X } 120 square feet in residential districts. This i requirement shall also apply to nonresidential districts unless otherwise authorized. 1 Architectural ornament not elsewhere regulated X X X l projecting not more than 4 inches r- - Awnings and canopies, extending not more than 21/2 X X X feet into front, corner side, or side yards and not more than 5 feet into rear yards allowed in residential districts only 1 Balconies projecting not more than 5 feet X 0 i Basketball hoop and backboard on or adjacent to X X X l permitted driveways Bay windows which are 1 story high, not more than X X X 10 feet long, project 2 feet or less and are located not less than 4 feet from a lot line 1 1 Below grade encroachments2 X X X Breezeways and open porches X il r Central air conditioning systems, heating, ventilating, X X e pool and filtering equipment, the outside elements t" shall be located not less than 4 feet from a lot line. Structures less than 4 feet from the property line shall be reviewed as a special exception according or to the provisions of section 21A.52.030 of this title. I Chimneys projecting 2 feet or less into the yard must ' X X be located not less than 2 feet from a lot line. 1 Decks (open) 2 feet high or less X X X Eaves, not including gutters projecting 2 feet or less ' X X , X into the yard. 4 foot eave may project into a 20 foot yard area. I -- Fallout shelters (completely underground), X _ conforming to applicable civil defense regulations i ,. and located not less than 4 feet from a lot line — Fences or walls subject to applicable height X X X restrictions of chapter 21A.40 of this title Fire escapes projecting 4 feet or less X g Flagpoles: Residential districts: 1 permanent flagpole X X X = per street frontage Nonresidential districts: 3 flagpoles per street X X X frontage 1 Subject to provisions of table 21A.36.020C of this section t 1 — — Grade changes of 2 feet or less except for the FP X X X _ and FR districts which shall be subject to the provisions of subsection 21A.24.010P of this title. c. (All grade changes located on a property line shall be supported by a retaining wall.) 2 I } Ground mounted utility boxes subject to the X X X I provisions of section 21A.40.160 of this title Ham radio antennas subject to provisions of X subsection 21A.40.090D of this title I - Landscaping, including decorative berms 4 feet or X X X less in height with no grade change along any property line, provided that if such landscaping obstructs the visibility of an intersection the city may require its pruning or removal. Laundry drying equipment (clothesline and poles) X Parking, carports and covered parking spaces X g except as otherwise expressly authorized by table 21A,44.050 of this title Patios on grade X X X I Patios on grade (attached, covered and unenclosed) , X maintaining a minimum 15 foot setback from the rear property line Porches (attached, covered and unenclosed) X projecting 5 feet or less Recreational (playground) equipment X Refuse dumpster r X r— Removable ramp for persons with disabilities (when X X X approved as a special exception) Satellite dish antennas X X Signs, subject to the provisions of chapter 21A.46 of X X X this title Steps and required landings 4 feet or less above or X X X below grade which are necessary for access to a permitted building and located not less than 4 feet from a lot line _ r Swimming pools (measured to the water line), tennis r X X '-` �.__ 3 I courts, game courts, and similar uses shall not be 4 located less than 10 feet from a property line. 4 s I Window mounted refrigerated air conditioners and X X X evaporative "swamp" coolers located at least 2 feet } from the property line. Window mounted refrigerated air conditioner units and "swamp" coolers less than 2 feet from the property line shall be reviewed as a special exception according to the provisions of section 21A.52.030 of this title. I Window wells not over 6 feet in width and projecting X X X 1 not more than 3 feet from structure 1 Notes: 1."X"denotes where obstructions are allowed. 2.Below grade encroachments(encroachments which are completely below grade where the surface grade remains intact and where the below grade encroachment is not visible from the surface)Into required yards shall be treated as a routine and uncontested matter in accordance with the procedures set forth in chapter 21A.14 of this title. 3.The accessory structure shall be located wholly behind the primary structure on the property.. Chapter 21A.46 — Signs, Section 21A,46.110(A)(3)(b) — Sign Regulations for Downtown Districts: — b. Delta Center Sports Arena Located on the Block Between South Temple and 100 South between 300 and 400 West Streets: STANDARDS FOR THE DELTA CENTER SPORTS ARENA LOCATED ON THE BLOCK BETWEEN SOUTH TEMPLE AND 100 SOUTH BETWEEN 300 AND 400 WEST STREETS Number Of Limit On Maximum Signs Combined Types Of ' Maximum ; Height Of , ' Permitted ' Number Signs Area Per ' Freestanding Minimum Per Sign Of Signs' Permitted : Sign Face ' Signs' Setback' Type Awning/canopy, 1 square foot' See note 1 , May extend ' 1 per first None a signs ' per linear 6 feet from floor v foot of face of : door/window storefront ' building but • (sign area not within 2 only) feet from back of curbs' r,-_,'r-_t.:L:r__>3---__."ry=4"_i ,._. w,----,5g,---,,,ram= Y..>F ,,,,u...- '--- , �„2,.,„...„ "-.._.=:-_>._....�=x:"%'i..,2_ ,,,--___ 4 Canopy, drive- :40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per None 1 through canopy face : canopy face if signage is 3 on 2 faces; 20% of canopy face if signs are 5 on 4 faces ' Construction . 64 square 12 feet 5 feet 1 per None g :sign feet ; storefront Flat sign 4 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per None g (general : per linear building face building ,foot ofci ;orientation) , building faces. ti Flat sign : 2 square feet' See note 1 n/a ; 3 per None (storefront : per linear ' business orientation)4 foot of each storefront store ;frontages Marquee sign Subject only ' See See ! 1 per None to subsection: subsection subsection storefront 21A.46.0700,' 21A.46.0700 21 A.46.070O. of this of this chapter. of this 1 chapter ; chapter i 'Monument 1 square foot' 20 feet None 1 per street 11 sign per sign ; per linear 'frontage !street foot of street frontage frontage Nameplate, 3 square feet 8 square feet None ' 1 per None building 1 building New . 200 square 12 feet 5 feet 1 per street None development • feet ,frontage sign Pole sign 1 square foot 45 feet None, but 1 per street '1 sign per per linear shall not frontage street 1 foot of street extend frontage j frontage; 200 across a square feet property line maximum for a singleri business, 300 square 5 feet : t ' maximum for; F` multiple 7 businesses 1 'Political sign 32 square 8 feet 5 feet No limit None feet 'n Private : 8 square feet' 4 feet 5 feet ; No limit None Fi directional sign; Public safety 8 square feet! 6 square feet ; None f No limit None i sign Real estate 32 square ; 8 feet None 1 per street None sign feet frontage E Roof signs '4 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per street ; None 1 per linear frontage Y foot of ' building face 1 or 6 square i feet per ; linear foot of : building face 1 °"' on buildings taller than 100 feet — t Window sign 25% of total No limit n/a No limit None 'frontage window area per use 90% of total frontage window area (interior or • exterior) for Delta Center ' Sports Arena , : events, not to , exceed 3 months in duration for each calendar year7 6 Notes: 1.For height limits on building signs,see subsection 21A.46.070J of this chapter. 2.Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs. 3.The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined. 4.Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors. 5.A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign. 6.Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. 7.Verbiage and/or corporate logos are limited to on premises advertising of Delta Contor Sports Arena events only and are limited to 10 percent of the window coverage. Chapter 21A.46 — 21A.46.120(E)(4)(b) — Sign Regulations For The UI, PL, PL-2, I And OS Districts b. Standards For Tthe Franklin Quest Baseball Stadium Sports Stadium Located on the Southeast Corner of 1300 South and West Temple: Flat signs, construction signs, political signs, real estate signs, new development signs, window signs, public safety signs, and nameplates shall comply with the table for standards for the PL, PL-2 and I districts. The design, materials, and colors for all signs must be compatible with the Sports Stadium on the corner of 1300 South and West Temple Franklin Quest baseball stadium subject to the approval of the Salt Lake City urban design committee. Maximum Types Of : Maximum Height Of ° Signs Area Per Sign • Freestanding Minimum Number Of Signs Permitted Face Signs' Setback' Permitted Awning 1 square foot See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor signs per linear foot feet from face door/window and not of awning of building, 2 to extend beyond 1 feet from foot on each side of back of curb the door or window a faces width Monument •60 square feet 8 feet 10 feet 1 per building frontage signs34 of total sign • face area including a base. The base shall be 25% of the sign height Pole signs 180 square feet 30 feet No sign 1 pole sign which (triangle per gross sign projection • allows 4 sign panels = frame face. 540 over the per sign face, 1 of structure) square feet for property line which may be an .ithe structure electronic changeable copy sign4 and 1 Buzz 3 logo sign (12 total signs for the triangular pole sign) Private 8 square feet of 4 feet 2 feet behind 2 per driveway ;directional total sign face property lines approach and as signs3 area including a : necessary for base. The base pedestrian direction shall be 25% of the sign height Notes: 1.For limits on the height of building signs,see subsection 21A.46.070J of this chapter. 2.Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs. 3.Modified from the standards for the FL, PL-2 and I districts and required for the Franklin Quest baseball sports stadium overlay district. 4.Electronic changeable copy signs shall only be permitted on arterial street frontages.Electronic changeable copy signs/panels shall not exceed 50 square feet. 5.Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. Chapter 21A.60 — List of Terms, Section 21A.60.020 — List of Defined Terms: Add "Pitched Roof" to the alphabetical list of defined terms. �*+, Chapter 21A.62 — Definitions, Section 21A.62.040 — Definitions of Terms: FRATERNITY/SORORITY HOUSE: A building which is occupied only by a group of university or college students who receive lodging and/or meals on the premises in exchange for compensation, and are associated together in a fraternity/sorority that is officially recognized by the university or college, and that has a national affiliation. , and who receive from the fraternity/sorority I dging and/or meals on the premises for s . Chapter 21A.62 — Definitions, Section 21A.62.040 — Definition of Terms: PITCHED ROOF: The covering_on the top of a structure, serving to protect against rain, snow, sunlight, wind, and extremes of temperature, having a minimum pitch or slope of a twp foot (2') rise over a twelve foot (12') run. Eliminate the "Summary Tables of Yard and Bulk Requirements" for the various use district chapters throughout the Zoning Ordinance as follows: Chapter 21A.24 — Residential Districts, Table 21A.24.200 8 • • or �, ,�� \VA'I oA i1.L\ ( i k o,\'A�'f i 11 1v`,1,1%`ir i jV/ 1^, 1.,01a tt p�wsYlarQ tll il�util�� ` e rd, I kCi 1? lVG k°)i9JU, yat r� tlll 110 Date Task/Inspection ! Status/Result t Action By Comments 2/12/2010 Staff Assignment In Progress Coffey,Cheri Target April 28 PC meeting 2/19/2010 Staff Assignment Assigned Traughber,Lex 2/19/2010 Staff Assignment In Progress Traughber,Lex 3/17/2010 Planning Dept Review In Progress Traughber,Lex 3/17/2010 Staff Assignment Routed Traughber,Lex 3/18/2010 Engineering Review Complete Drummond,Randy The Engineering Division has no concerns regarding the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments, 3/24/2010 Transporation Review Complete Walsh,Barry March 24, 2010 Lex Traughber,Planning Re: PLNPCM2010-00064,Zoning Ordinance Fine Tuning Amendments The division of transportation review comments and recommendations are as follows; The Eight Items submitted do not reflect any direct Impact to the Public Transportation roadway system or required on site transportation issues, Sincerely, Barry Walsh Cc Kevin Young,P.E. Randy Drummond, P.E. Peggy Garcia,Public Utilities Ted Itchon Fire Larry Butcher,Permits File 3/30/2010 Zoning Review In Progress Brown,Ken The Zoning review comments are;Once the language for each of the proposed changes has been drafted, Building Services Dept,would like to review the language to see how it affects the Issuance of permits and also,to help in verifying that there are no conflicts with other city ordinances. 4/1/2010 Public Utility Review Complete Stoker,Justin We support all of the proposed amendments without any concerns or comments. 4/2/2010 Zoning Review Complete Brown,Ken The Zoning review comments are;Once the language for each of the proposed changes has been drafted, Building Services Dept.would like to review the language to see how it affects the issuance of permits and also,to help In verifying that there are no conflicts with other city ordinances. Traughber, Lex Aims* From: Brown, Ken �$ Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 10:08 AM To: Traughber, Lex Cc: Norris, Nick; Butcher, Larry; Hardman, Alan; Michelsen, Alan; Stonick, Anika Subject: RE: PLNPCM2010-00064 Zoning Ordinance Fine Tuning Amendments Categories: Other Lex, I have circulated this proposal around this office and have the following comments; Chapter 21.A36 —General Provisions, Table 21A.36.020B — Obstructions in Required Yards; No comments. Chapter 21A.46 — Signs, Section 21A.46.110(A)(3)(b) — Sign Regulations for Downtown Districts: No comments. Chapter 21A.46 — Signs, Section 21A.46.4-1-0(E)( ewntewn Districts: The correct reference should be 21A,46.120(E)(4)(b) — Sign Regulations For The UI, PL, PL-2, I And OS Districts; No other comments. Chapter 21A.60 — List of Terms, Section 21A.60.020 — List of Defined Terms: No comments. 011111401 Chapter 21A.62 — Definitions, Section 21A.62.040— Definitions of Terms: Pitched Roof: Larry Butcher would like to see "having a minimum pitch or slope of a one two foot (4 2') rise over a twelve foot (12') run." This would be more in line with the building code requirement of using material designed for flat roofs on slopes less than two foot (2') rise over a twelve foot (12') run. Eliminate the "Summary Tables of Yard and Bulk Requirements" for the various use district chapters throughout the Zoning Ordinance as follows: There are people in this office that would like to see these Tables remain since they are a desirable handout for property owners, designers and architects which summarize several requirements in one place. Of course this would mean that we have to make an effort to assure that the information is current with the information provided elsewhere in the ordinances. From: Traughber, Lex Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 12:49 PM To: Brown, Ken Cc: Norris, Nick Subject: RE: PLNPCM2010-00064 Zoning Ordinance Fine Tuning Amendments Ken, You had requested to see the draft changes for this petition prior to going to a hearing. Attached is draft of the proposed ordinances changes if you want to look at them. If you have suggestions for changes, please let me know as soon as possible. If you have no comments, let me know that as i well. I'm taking this to the PC in Dec, so if you could get back to me in the next couple of weeks that would be great. Thanks, Lex Traughber Senior Planner Salt Lake City Planning Division 451 S. State Street, Room 406 P.O. Box 145480 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5480 Telephone: (801) 535-6184 Fax: (801) 535-6174 From: Brown, Ken Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 1:22 PM To: Traughber, Lex Subject: PLNPCM2010-00064 Zoning Ordinance Fine Tuning Amendments Please see that attached Building Services comments. Ken Brown Senior Development Review Planner SLC Building Services Dept. 451 State St. Room 215 Mailing Address PO Box 145471 Salt Lake City, Ut 84114-5471 801-535-6179 801-535-7750 (Fax) 2 SALT LAL S CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MELTING AGENDA In Room 326 of the City Et County Building at 451 South State Street Wednesday, December d, 2olo at 6:3o p.m.or immediately following the Work Session. The field trip is scheduled to Gave et 4:00 p.ni. Dinner will be served to the Planning Commissioners and stain at 5:00p.m. in Room 126. Work Session: 5:30 it Room 326. The Planning Commission will hold a work session from approximately 5:30-6:30. During the Work Session the Planning Staff will brief the Planning Commission on pending projects, discuss project updates and minor administrative matters. This portion of the meeting is open to the public for observation. 1. Mayor Ralph Becker to meet with the Planning Commission to discuss various matters including his Vision for a Green City 2. Clarion Associates will discuss the progress of the Sustainable City Code Initiative project (Staff contact: Cheri Coffey at 801-535-6188 or cheri.coffey@slcgov.com. 3. Discussion about proposed changes to Outdoor Advertising regulations (Staff contact: Doug Dansie at 801-535-6182 or douq.dansie(a)a,slcaov.com Approval of Minutes Report of the Chair and In0.9 Chair Report of the Director o Public Hearing 6:30 or immediately following the work session 1. PLl PCM2010 00610: Mark Miller Conditional use for auto sales- A request by Mark Miller Toyota to expand its current facility located at approximately 730 South West Temple. The property is zoned D-2 Downtown Support District in City Council District 4, represented by Luke Garrott (Staff contact: John Anderson at 801-535-7214 or john.anderson©slcgov.com). 2. MVCM2€ 10-00672 Harmon's Grocery Store Planned Development - A request by Harmons Grocery for a planned development of a grocery store at approximately 1706 E 1300 South in the CN (Neighborhood Commercial),zoning district and in City Council District 6, represented by JT Martin. The planned development request includes modifications to building and parking setbacks, fence regulations and sign regulations. (Staff contact: Elizabeth Reining at 801-535-6313 or elizabeth.reining@slcgov.com). 3. PLL4`PCM20 i0-OD561 Neff Rezzoninch A request by Jeremy Neff for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone property located at approximately 163 West 1700 South from Community Business to General Commercial in order to bring the property and-its use into conformance with the zoning district and to match the zoning of the adjacent property which is also owned by the applicant. The proposed zoning district is CG (General Commercial) and is located in Council District 5, represented by Jill Remington-Love. (Staff contact: Maryann Pickering at 801-535-7660 or maryann.pickering@slcgov.com). 4. __PELF'•9P.01201.fJT0059-^.•:_PinillinJ_Cioncclitiona9_Mse-dor_a OfficetRacentior3_Cen':ei:_in_a_Q anrdinark_sate.=-A - request by Bonnie Phillips for a conditional use to allow a reception center at approximately 1229 East South Temple. The purpose of the proposal is to allow space for small gatherings and meetings that foster respectful dialogue, understanding and community discussions. The property is zoned Special Development Pattern SR1-A and is located in Council District 3, represented by Stan Penfold. (Staff contact: Ray Milliner (801)535-7645 or ray.lnilliner@slcgov.com). 5. PL NPCN2O10-00300 Sentry Electric Fence Security Systems Text Amencdrmer t — A request by Michael Pate for Sentry Security Systems to amend Chapter 21A.40.120 of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. The amendment 4vould add language to regulate the use of electric security fences in Manufacturing and Commercial zones. Changes would be City wide. (Staff contact: Ray Milliner at 801-535-7645 or ray.milliner@slcgov.comn). 6. PL6',].` 19V32.0013-l9597, Mt. OlivetiRoland i-lali St, ivlar%': S.;C ee] — Guy Kroesche, Stoel �c Rives, LLP, representing Rowland Hall — St Mark's School, is requesting subdivision approval of the property located at approximately 1443 E. Sunnyside Avenue. Proposed are two (2) parcels; one (1) parcel of approximately 13.037 acres in size (the "RHSM Parcel"), and one (1) parcel of approximately 28.446 acres in size (the "Revised Mt. Olivet Parcel"). This subdivision request is a result of City Council action amending the East Bench Master Plan and rezoning the subject property from Open Space (OS) to include institutional (I) for the RHSM parcel pursuant to Salt Lake City Ordinance number 21 of 2006. The subject parcel is located in City Council District Six represented by J.T. Martin. (Staff contact: Lex Traughber at 801.535.6184 or lex.traugihber sslcgov.corn). 7. PLNPCM2O O-OOO64, Fine h uninel Zonincl Amendments - A request by salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker to analyze and adjust the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance (Title 21) to provide for clarity and efficiency of use as part of a code maintenance program. The subject Petition addresses several minor fine tuning text amendments that would apply citywide if adopted by the City Council. (Staff contact: Lex Traughber at 801.535.6184 or lex.traughber@slcgov.com). Amok The files for the above items are available in the Planning Division offices,room 406 of the City and County Building. Please contact the staff planner for information,Visit the Planning Division's website at www.slcgov.com/CED/planning for copies of the Planning Commission agendas,staff reports,and minutes.Staff Reports will be posted the Friday prior to the meeting and minutes will be posted two days after they are ratified,which usually occurs at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission.Planning Commission Meetings may be watched live on SLCTV Channel17;past meetings are recorded and archived,and may be viewed at www.slctv.com INFORMATION TO APPLICANTS AND CITIZENS 1. Attendance:Applicant or representative must be present during tl will not be reviewed. 2. Decision Making Process:Planning Commission will review one t. ,ceive information from the applicant,professional staff,adjoining neighbors and citizens.After reviewing the case,the Planning Come. .oerate on the case in executive session.No additional testimony will be accepted during the executive session,unless requested by the Commits,.,.._ ,clarification purposes.The Planning Commission will make their decision by making a motion,second,discussion and majority vote by the Commission. 3. Appeals process:Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Planning Commission may appeal that decision to the Salt Lake City Land Use Appeals Board within thirty(10)days after the Planning Commission final decision. 4. Meeting notices:Meeting notices are made available 12days in advance.If persons wish to submit written comments they should be directed to the Plonning Commission or Planning Staff member indicated at least 7 days in advance to enable the Commissioners to consider those written comments.Comments should be sent to: Salt Lake City Planning Commission PO Box 145480 Salt Lake City,UT 84114-5480 Physical Address:451 S State Street,Room 406 Salt Lake City,UT 84111 '" NOTE: Please turn off cellular phones during the meeting. We comply with all,1D, guidelines.People With disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to attend this meeting.Accommodations may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids. This is an accessible facility. For questions, requests, or additional information, please contact the Planning Commission Secretary at 535-6171 regarding this agenda or ADA accommodations.TDD 535-6220. --- Sal Lake City Planning Commission - 451 S State Street,Room 406 PO Box 145480 Salt Lake City,Utah 84114 5480 R^TURN SERVICE REnUESTED NOTICE OF HEARING ; S3I:.. I . L01_.f(Vdllik I IoGK �(�. Salt Lake City planning Uivls!u,r 451 S State Street, Room 406 ,004044, PO Box 145480 5a..80 Salt Lake City, Utah 8 :__ 4�n11tt : .: , .. .............. ....: 8:o8:4e PM PLNPCM2oio-00064, Fine Tuning Zoning Amendments -A request by Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker to analyze and adjust the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance(Title 21)to provide for clarity and efficiency of use as part of a code maintenance program. The subject Petition addresses several minor fine tuning text amendments that would apply citywide if adopted by the City Council. Chairperson Fife recognized Lex Traughber as staff representative. Mr.Traughber stated that this was a petition to clarify and make more efficient the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance as part of a code maintenance program. He stated that the seven items listed on the front of the staff report were all inclusive. 8:09:28 PM Questions from the Commissioners Commissioner Woodhead asked about number five, and was interested in the definition of fraternities and sororities. She directed the question to council, and stated that the notion zoning for fraternities and sororities depended on their national affiliation seemed to be questionable. She wonder if it would have been better to worded to say that it applied to fraternities and sororities that are recognized by the University of Utah, as opposed to requiring that an organization of people actually be nationally recognized to have access to zoning. Planning Director Sommerkorn agreed that it could be that way,but it was one of the requirements of the University of Utah,that the fraternities and sororities are nationally affiliated. Commissioner Woodhead stated that she felt the University of Utah could do in terms it recognized as a "student club"would be different than who could be discriminated against with regard to zoning. Mr. Sommerkorn stated that he understood her point. Chairperson Fife asked for clarification, asking if the wording should be changed that the student fraternities and sororities be recognized by the University of Utah. Land Use Attorney Nielson stated that there have been groups that had asked the University of Utah for recognition as a fraternity or sorority. The group would have been something that would have typically been viewed as a fraternity or sorority, including a rugby club that did not require that its'members be students of the University, and a religious organization that may not have required an enrollment requirement that the University would not be able to regulate or oversee. In those cases,the University did not accept them as fraternities or sororities. Mr.Traughber added that the University of Utah required national affiliation to recognize a group as a fraternity or a sorority. Mr. Norris stated that there were a number of ordinances that address fraternities or sororities. Salt Lake Planning Commission Minutes, December 8, 2010 Page 17 4.41/4 Commissioner Woodhead wondered if it was necessary in order to create some sort of freedom of association risk. Land Use Attorney Nielson asked if Commissioner Woodhead was concerned that a chapter that wanted to start could regulated by the school,but not necessarily have a national affiliation. Commissioner Woodhead agreed, stating that she was concerned about the City's interest. She compared the sororities and fraternities to businesses stating that the comparison could be made that businesses could be required to have a national affiliation,or had to be owned locally. She felt this could be a variation of that. Land Use Attorney Nielson stated that he understood her concern and stated that they were valid. Planning Director Sommerkorn stated that there were requirements in the Ordinance that stated it has to be a University approved, and a University regulated Commissioner De Lay made the point that this ordinance did not include the area surrounding Westminster College. Planning Director Sommerkorn stated that the Ordinance was specific to the area surrounding the University of Utah. Land Use Attorney Nielson stated that fraternities and sororities are specialized uses that are related to the educational institution. He believed that some of the examples of non enrolled persons do not fall within the distinction. Amok Commissioner McHugh asked if the recommendation was to strike or change item number five. Land Use Attorney Nielson stated that the City Attorney's office does not make recommendations on policy issues. 8:16:35 PM Public Hearing No one chose to speak 8:16:41 PM Close of Public Hearing 8:16:5o P1'1 Motion Commissioner De Lay made the motion in regard to PLNPCM2oto-00064, Fine Tuning Zoning Amendments I move to approve based on the findings of the staff report recommend a positive recommendation on items 1,2,3,4,6 and 7 and a recommend of further review of item number 5 Salt Lake Planning Commission Minutes, December 8, 2010 Page 18 Commissioner Luke seconded the motion. 8:17:58 PM Vote: Commissioners Drown, De Lay, Gallegos, Hill, Luke,Wirthlin, and Woodhead all voted "aye" Commissioner McHugh voted"no". The motion passed. 8:19:24 PM Meeting adjourned This document, along with the digital recording, constitute the official minutes of the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held on December 8, 2010. Angela Hasenberg Salt Lake Planning Commission Minutes, December 8, 2010 Page 19 Remarks: Petition No: PLNPCM2010-00064 By: Salt Lake City Planning Division Fine Tuning Date Filed: February 15, 2010 Address: Citywide Remarks: Petition No: PLNPCK02010'00064 By: Salt Lake City Planning Division Fine Tuning Date Filed: February 15. 2O1O Address: Citywide ciLY L Lo1•0 Lii:// Petition Initiation MI Planning Division Community&Economic Development Department To: File From: Wilf Sommerkorn, Planning Director Vi" Date: February 15, 2010 CC: Frank Gray, Community and Economic Development Director; Mary De La Mare-Schaefer, Community& Economic Development Department Deputy Director; Pat Comarell,Assistant Planning Director; Cheri Coffey, Planning Manager; file Re: Fine Tuning Bundle- February 2010. In accordance with a letter signed by Mayor Ralph Becker on November 4, 2009, which authorizes the initiation of various petitions to implement the ongoing Code Maintenance program for the Fine Tuning elements of the City's Zoning Code, this memo identifies the next bundle of Fine Tuning Amendments to the Zoning Code which the Planning Division will process. The issues to be addressed include the following: 1. Clarify which decision making bodies hear appeals of administrative decisions, including those of administrative hearing officers. The Planning Commission hears appeals of administrative hearing officer decisions for conditional uses and conditional building and site design review projects and the Board of Adjustment hears appeals of administrative decisions, including those of administrative hearing officers, for special exceptions or interpretations or where it is not otherwise specified in the Zoning Ordinance. Section 21A.16.010 a. The purpose of the administrative hearing was initially intended to streamline the process. The City Council allowed for administrative hearings of various types of requests including conditional uses, special exceptions and subdivisions. Where there is an appeal relating to a decision on a specific type of request, the appeal should be heard by the decision making body which has the ultimate decision making authority and expertise to decide on those types of requests. The Planning Commission has the decision making authority for conditional uses and conditional building and site design review requests. The Board of Adjustment has the decision making authority for special exceptions and interpretations of the zoning ordinance. e Page 1 2. Specify that appeals of administrative decisions, including those of an administrative hearing officer, must be made within 10 days of the notice of decision rather than 30 days. Section 21A.16.030 A a. In 2009, the City Council adopted an ordinance which decreased the appeal period from 30 days to 10 days for various types of decisions. The administrative decisions, including those of the administrative hearing officer, was inadvertently missed in the earlier amendments. The proposed amendment would make all of the appeals timeframes consistent. 3. Clarify that Fraternities and Sororities must have a national affiliation in order to be considered as a Fraternity or Sorority as it pertains to the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. (Section 21A.62.040) a. This amendment would be consistent with the current regulations of the University of Utah, which requires a national affiliation in order to become a Fraternity or Sorority of the University. 4. Create a definition of a pitched roof to be a roof with a minimum of a one (1)foot rise over a twelve (12)foot run. (21A.62) This has been an ongoing issue with determining the height of a structure, especially as it relates to the height regulations for single-family and two family zoning districts. 5. Change the name "Standards for the Franklin Quest Baseball Stadium" sign overlay to "Standards for the Sports Stadium located on the southeast corner of 1300 South and West Temple." (Section 21A.46.120) a The name of the actual baseball stadium has changed and may change again in the future. Rather than providing a specific building name, it is proposed to describe the ^'""* building and its location. 6. Change the name`Standards for the Delta Center" sign overlay to"Standards for the Sports Arena located on the block between South Temple and 100 South between 300 and 400 VVest Streets. (Section 21A.46.110.b) a The name of the actual arena has changed and may change again in the future. Rather than providing a specific building name, it is proposed to describe the building and its location. 7. Eliminate the summary tables of the specific zoning districts from the zoning ordinances. (Various throughout use district chapters). a. In the past, the summary table has not been amended to reflect the specific changes to the lot and bulk regulations for various zoning districts. In addition, the summation found in the summary table is not always specific enough to accurately portray the regulations. Rather than have a summary table that is codified in the Zoning Ordinance and more difficult to change when inaccuracies are found, the Community and Economic Development Department will use a summary table to help the citizens and applicants in a more concise way, but the table will not be codified. 8. Clarify that an accessory structure is allowed in the side yard setback where it is located wholly behind the primary structure. (Table 21A.36.020B) 0 Page 2 a. This would allow an accessory structure to be located behind the house, but not necessarily within the rear yard setback unless otherwise precluded by the specific zoning district. As part of the process, the Planning Division will follow the City adoption processes including citizen input and public hearings with the Planning Commission and City Council where applicable. ® Page 3 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: February 24,2011 SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2010-00328—request to rezone properties at 1260 to 1306 N.Redwood Road from Single-Family Residential R- 1/7000 to Open Space OS (Rose Park Golf Course) AFFECTED COUNCIL DISTRICTS: If the ordinance is adopted it would affect Council District One. STAFF REPORT BY: Nick Tarbet,Janice Jardine ADMINISTRATIVE DEPT. Community Development Department,Planning Division AND CONTACT PERSON: Nole Walkingshaw,Planning Programs Supervisor Daunte Rushton,Planning Intern COUNCIL ACTION: Consider an ordinance to rezone city-owned properties located at 1260 to 1306 North Redwood Road from Single-Family Residential R-1/7000 to Open Space OS. (The properties.are-adjacent to Rose Park Golf Course.) • COUNCIL AUTHORITY - RELEVANT LEGAL REQUIREMENTS: The City Council, as the legislative body, is authorized through State law and the City's zoning regulations to make the final decisions on land use issues after receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Code references and notice requirements are noted below. o Utah Code,Title 10,Chapter 9a Municipal Land Use Development and Management Act o City Code,Title 21 A Zoning, Chapter 21 A.10 General Application and Public Hearing Procedures and Chapter 21A.54 Amendments ▪ Zoning Ordinance Notice requirements: Newspaper advertisement,posting a sign on the property and written notification 12 days prior to the Public Hearing • City Council Notice policy: Newspaper advertisement and written notification 14 days prior to the Council Public Hearing PROCESS: Action taken to Date May 24,2010 Petition assigned to planner. June 17,2010 Project petition was mailed to the Rose Park Community Council for review. July 15, 2010 Open house for public comment and review. October 13, 2010 Planning Commission held a public hearing. December 2,2010 Ordinance created. January 25, 2010 Received in Mayor's Office. January 26, 2011 Received in Council Office. 1 • Council process—Next Steps March 1,2011 Council Work Session briefing Should the Council choose to move this item forward at this time, Council staff has identified the following tentative dates: March 22,2011 Set hearing date(tentative) April 5, 2011 Public hearing(tentative) April 26, 2011 Council Action(tentative) POTENTIAL OUTCOMES: If the Council approves or declines the proposed ordinance: • Approval: The Rose Park Golf Course driving range could be expanded. Golf Courses are a permitted use in the Open Space zoning district. Residential uses are not permitted in the Open Space zoning district. • Denial: Residential units could be constructed on 7,000 sq. ft. lots or through the planned development process.The Rose Park Golf Course driving range could not be expanded. Golf Courses are not a permitted use in the Single-Family Residential R-1/7000 zoning district. Note: The City purchased these lots in 2010 with the intention of expanding the Rose Park Golf Course. KEY ELEMENTS: A. An ordinance has been prepared to amend the zoning map to rezone properties located at approximately 1260, 1274, 1282, 1292 and 1306 North Redwood Road from Single-Family Residential R-1/7000 to Open Space OS. This action would facilitate expansion of the driving range for the Rose Park Golf Course.The five parcels are located along the east side of Redwood Road between the Jordan River Par 3 and Rose Park Golf Courses and are now owned by the City. (See vicinity map at the end of this staff report)The ordinance will become effective on the date of its first publication. B. The Administration's paperwork provides detailed information relating to the proposed rezoning. Key points are summarized below. 1. In 2008/2009 the residential structures were demolished by the former property owner. The intent was to redevelop the property with additional residential units but redevelopment plans were never finalized. 2. Between March and July 2010 the City purchased the properties with the intent to expand the Rose Park Golf Course. 3. Approval of the rezoning request would assist with enhancement of both the Rose Park and the Jordan River Par 3 Golf Courses,and would be consistent with the purpose of the Open Space zoning district. C. In response to Council staff questions,the City's Golf Division provided the following information regarding trees on the properties. • "Golf has been working with Bill Rutherford(City Urban Forester)to determine if any trees in this area that can be transplanted to other areas of the Rose Park Golf Course. We are hoping to use the same contractor that is transplanting trees from the new Public Safety Complex. Some of the trees will be transplanted, some will be removed,and a few might be able to remain where they are on the expanded driving range." D. The intent of the Residential Zoning Districts is to provide a range of housing choices to meet the needs of Salt Lake City's citizens,to offer a balance of housing types and densities,to preserve and maintain 2 the city's neighborhoods as safe and convenient places to live,to promote the harmonious development of residential communities,to ensure compatible infill development, and to help implement adopted plans. (Sec. 21A.24.010.A Statement of Intent) • The purpose of the Single-Family Residential R-1/7,000 District is to provide for conventional single-family residential neighborhoods on lots not less than 7,000 sq. ft. (Sec. 21A.24.060.A Purpose Statement) E. The purpose of the Open Space zoning district is to preserve and protect areas of public and private open space and exert a greater level of control over any potential redevelopment of existing open space areas. (Sec. 21A.32.100.A Purpose Statement) F. The properties are located within the Airport Flight Path Protection and the Riparian Corridor overlay zoning districts.New development will require compliance with the regulations of applicable overlay zones. G. The Planning staff report provides analysis and findings for the Zoning Ordinance Section 21 A.50.050— Standards for General Amendments.The standards were evaluated in the Planning staff report and considered by the Planning Commission. (Discussion and fmdings for the standards are found on pages 4-6 of the Planning staff report.) H. The City's Fire,Police,and Public Utilities Departments and Transportation and Engineering Divisions have reviewed the request. The development proposal will be required to comply with City standards and regulations. (Specific comments may be found on pages 5-6 in the Planning staff report.) I. The public process included written notification of the Planning Commission hearing to Community Council Chairs,business groups and the Planning Division electronic list serve. Notice was also posted on the City's website.The Planning staff report notes: 1. On June 17,2010,the petition information was sent to the Rose Park Community Council. The Community Council Chair notified Planning staff that the Council takes the summer off and would be unable to hear the proposal until September. (Council staff confirmed that the Rose Park Community Council did not receive a presentation regarding the proposed rezoning and golf course expansion.) 2. On July 15,2010,a Planning Division sponsored Open House was conducted regarding the zoning map amendment with three people signing the attendance roll and no public input received. J. On October 13,2010,the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted to forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council. Issues discussed by the Planning Commission related to replacement homes for the structures that were demolished. Planning staff stated: 1. The homes were demolished in 2008 by a private company. The intent was to redevelop the property with additional residential units but plans were never finalized. 2. The City purchased the properties after the demolitions had occurred. 3. A demolition fee had been paid. MASTER PLAN AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS: A. The proposed rezoning request is supported by the 1990 Northwest Community Master Plan policies, and is consistent with the purposes, goals,objectives,and policies of the adopted general plan of Salt Lake City. 3 1. The Administration's paperwork and Planning staff report note that"Within the Master Plan,the section entitled"Golf Courses",explains that when renovation of the Rose Park Golf Course is considered, one option should be `relocating portions of the existing golf course along Redwood Road'. The five parcels proposed for the zoning amendment are located in a unified and unbroken pattern along Redwood Road, and is consistent with the matter of relocation." 2. After consulting with Planning staff,it has been noted that this section of the master plan was incorrectly cited. The Plan states"One alternative to consider is the relocation of the Rosewood Park active recreational facilities to Redwood Road on the present golf course and relocating portions of the existing golf course along Redwood Road to the area north of Rosewood Park." 3. This recommendation does not apply to properties being considered by the Council and would not impact the rezoning request. 4. The Future Land Use Map in the Northwest Community Master Plan identifies these properties for Parks/Open Space land uses. 5. Golf Courses are allowed as a permitted use in the Open Space zoning district. • Additional citywide Master Plan and Policy considerations are provided below. B. The City's Strategic Plan and the Futures Commission Report express concepts such as maintaining a prominent sustainable city,ensuring the City is designed to the highest aesthetic standards and is pedestrian friendly, convenient,and inviting,but not at the expense of minimizing environmental stewardship or neighborhood vitality. The Plans emphasize placing a high priority on maintaining and developing new affordable residential housing in attractive, friendly, safe environments and creating attractive conditions for business expansion including retention and attraction of large and small businesses. C. The Council's growth policy notes that growth in Salt Lake City will be deemed the most desirable if it meets the following criteria: 1. Is aesthetically pleasing; 2. Contributes to a livable community environment; 3. Yields no negative net fiscal impact unless an overriding public purpose is served;and 4. Forestalls negative impacts associated with inactivity. D. The City's 1990 Urban Design Element includes statements that emphasize preserving the City's image, neighborhood character and maintaining livability while being sensitive to social and economic realities. Policy concepts include: 1. Allow individual districts to develop in response to their unique characteristics within the overall urban design scheme for the city. 2. Ensure that land uses make a positive contribution to neighborhood improvement and stability. 3. Ensure that building restoration and new construction enhance district character. 4. Require private development efforts to be compatible with urban design policies of the city regardless of whether city financial assistance is provided. 5. Treat building height, scale and character as significant features of a district's image. 6. Ensure that features of building design such as color,detail,materials and scale are responsive to district character,neighboring buildings, and the pedestrian. cc: David Everitt,Bianca Shreeve,Karen Hale,Lisa Harrison-Smith,Art Raymond,Holly Hilton,Ed Rutan,Lynn Pace,Paul Nielson,Jeff Niermeyer,Tom Ward,Maureen Riley,Allen McCandless,Rick Graham,Vicki Bennett,Emy Maloutas,Frank Gray,Mary De La Mare-Schafer,Orion Goff,Les Koch,Larry Butcher,Craig Spangenberg,Wilf Sommerkorn,Cheri Coffey,Joel Paterson,Nole Walkingshaw,Daunte Rushton,City Council Liaisons,Mayors Liaisons 4 File Location: Community and Economic Development Dept.,Planning Division,Zoning Map Amendment/Rezoning—Mayor Ralph Becker— 1260 to 1306 N.Redwood Road • • • • 0 Vicinity Map Au- ' . I.1 1.1 `tom. -',-I•- , . .•��r ' _ ' w. - .. I A_ 1 IRve Pros R�quMYg 't1' i Zoning Mop Amendment hnn0.0 9...�� Fv...r r.. = - (R-V7,000)to(OS) • ri r'.l•�_: ...'I•!:' ' R�11.l,.r- .IP _.w' i.IIIt. . .- I. _ - r . �•- s-a- ti • s ° r f e� ri \+« e 1. 44,, • .. . to.' ''. ,, • II. { a • .r RECEIVED SCANNED TO: S' �.(I'IL 'Myf i(I ! ' 0 ; 1 (i l i SCANNEDy BY: r_ ._1 t DATE: '/4w 2-(A•.. • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY 6 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL jH l 0 d [A JAN 2 5 2011 J / Date Rtajive Davi Everitt,C f of Staff Date sent to Council: 2.S1 Tao TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 20,2011 Jill Remington-Love,Chair FROM: Frank Gray,Director _ Community&Economic Develop e SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM 2010-00328.Zoning Map Amendment by Mayor Ralph Becker to rezone 1260 N.-1306 N.Redwood Road from Single-family residential(R- 1/7,000)to Open Space(OS). STAFF CONTACTS: Nole Walkingshaw,Planning Programs Supervisor,at 535-7128 or Nole.walkingshaw@a,slcgov.com;Daunte Rushton,Planning Intern, at Daunte.rushton@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council holds a briefing and schedule a public hearing. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND DISCUSSION: Issue Origin:Mayor Ralph Becker is requesting that the Salt Lake City Council approve a zoning map amendment to rezone five parcels of property between 1260 North and 1306 North Redwood Road from Single-Family Residential(R-1/7,000)to Open Space(OS). The five parcels are currently vacant and undeveloped. The City has acquired these properties to augment and improve both the Jordan River Par 3 and Rose Park golf courses. Analysis: The proposed zoning amendment will allow the City to improve and expand both of the City-owned golf courses,which lie adjacent to the subject parcels. The five parcels currently have the land use of Single-Family Residential(R-1/7,000),and the proposed amendment to Open Space(OS)is appropriate in its provision of a harmonious and consistent contribution to the overall character of existing development within the immediate area of the subject properties. 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 P.O.BOX 14548 fi,BALT LAKE CITY, T H 4 14- 48fi Petition PLNPCM#2010-OQ� )�g�gne, �'I�BIZ� ood Road Page 1 www.s E�Eo.�oM Comparing the (R-1/7,000) and (OS) Districts, there is a differentiation in the potential land use amenities between the said Districts. The purpose of the R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District is for the provision of single-family residential neighborhoods with lots not less than seven thousand (7,000) square feet in size. The purpose of the Open Space (OS) District is to "preserve and protect areas of public and private open space and exert a greater level of control over any potential development of existing open space areas." The properties previously had single-family dwellings upon them, but the former owners demolished the homes prior to the City acquiring them. No outstanding issues were raised by the public for the proposed zoning map amendment. Commentary from the Public Utility and Transportation Departments was provided in regards to the potential impacts of the proposed zoning map amendment. The Public Utility review included the recommendation for termination of the remaining water laterals between 1260 North and 1306 North Redwood Road. The Transportation review explains that a rezone from Single-Family Residential to Open Space (OS) would remove the future reinstatement of the driveways and reduce vehicular impacts to Redwood Road. Master Plan Considerations: The Northwest Community Master Plan, under subsection of "Golf Courses" within the Parks element explains that when renovation of the Rose Park Golf Course is considered, the properties along Redwood Road would be proficient for the future land usage of Open Space (OS) (page 6). The future land use map of the Northwest Community Master Plan identifies the five parcels as Open Space. The Future Land Use Map in the Northwest Community Master Plan shows the properties as Open Space. PUBLIC PROCESS On June 17, 2010, the petition information was sent to the Rose Park Community Council. Brad Bartholomew, Chairman of the Rose Park Community Council, provided notice to Nole Walkingshaw that the City Council takes the summer off, and would be unable to hear the proposal until September. The subject parcels are within 600 feet of the Community Councils Boundaries, and an Open House was held at the Salt Lake City and County Building. On July 15, 2010 an Open House was conducted regarding the zoning map amendment, with three people signing the attendance roll, and no public input received. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 13, 2010. No issues were raised at the public hearing. The Planning Commission voted unanimously in favor of the proposed zoning map amendment, forwarding a favorable recommendation to the City Council. RELEVANT ORDINANCES Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Maps are authorized under Section 21A.50 of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance, as detailed in Section 21A.50.050: "A decision to amend the text of this title or the zoning map by general amendment is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the City Council and is not controlled by any one standard." It does, however, list five standards, which should be analyzed prior to rezoning property (Section 21 A.50.050 A-E). Petition PLNPCM #2010-00328 Open Space Rezone at North Redwood Road Page 2 The five standards are discussed in detail starting on page 4 of the Planning Commission Staff Report (see Attachment 5B). Sections 10-9a-204 and 205 of the Utah Code Title 10, Chapter 9a, Municipal Land Use, Development and Management Act regulate the requirements for noticing a general plan amendment and land use ordinance amendment. The petition for zoning amendment was published in the newspaper on October 4, 2010 meeting State Code noticing requirements. Petition PLNPCM ;'2010-00328 Open Space Rezone at North Redwood Road Page 3 PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition PLNPCM 2010-00328 May 24, 2010 Petition Assigned to Nole Walkingshaw and Daunte Rushton. June 17, 2010 Project petition was mailed to the Rose Park Community Council for review. June 24, 2010 Staff routing memo was distributed to the relevant City Departments for review. July 6, 2010 Notice of an open house was posted. July 15, 2010 An open house was conducted for public comment and review. September 24, 2010 Notice mailed out for the Planning Commission meeting. September 30, 2010 Sign posted on location of the five properties for the Planning Commission meeting. October 4, 2010 Newspaper notice posted for the Planning Commission meeting. October 13, 2010 The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the zoning map amendment and voted unanimously in favor of the project, giving a positive recommendation to the City Council. December 2, 2010 Ordinance created 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 201 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 1260, 1274, 1282, 1292 and 1306 North Redwood Road from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential) to OS (Open Space)) An ordinance amending the zoning map to re-zone properties located at approximately 1260, 1274, 1282, 1292 and 1306 North Redwood Road from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential) to OS (Open Space) pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2010-00328. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission ("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on October 13, 2010 on an application submitted by Mayor Ralph Becker ("Applicant") to amend the City's zoning map (Petition No. PLNPCM201 0-00328) to re-zone properties located at approximately 1260, 1274, 1282, 1292 and 1306 North Redwood Road from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential) to OS (Open Space); and WHEREAS, at its October 13, 2010 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council") on said application; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the City's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the properties located at approximately 1260 North Redwood Road (Tax ID. No. 08-27-201-006), 1274 North Redwood Road (Tax ID. No. 08-27-201-005), 1282 North Redwood Road (Tax ID. No. 08-27-201-004), 1292 North Redwood Road (Tax ID. No. 08-27-201-003) and 1306 North Redwood Road (Tax ID. No. 08-27-201-002), and which is more particularly described on Exhibit"A" attached hereto, shall be and hereby are re-zoned from from R- 1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential) to OS (Open Space). SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of 201 CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney's Office (SEAL) � np� *L, 2-0a 1 c7 Date: — Bill No. of 201 By. Pa it C.Nielson,Scni r Cut Attorney Published: 11B_ATT1' 15727-vI-Ordinance_amending_zoning_1260-1306_N_Redaood.DOC 7 Amok Legal Description 1306 N Redwood Rd. Parcel No: 0827201002 0829. BEG 145.8 RDS N &47.10 FT E FR SW COR OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 27,. T 1N, R 1W,S L M; E 229.7 FT; S 88.5 FT; W 229.70 FT; N 0^. 20' E 88.5 FT TO BEG.0.47 AC. 5244-0842,0843 8298-9000. 9115-8731. 1292 N Redwood Rd. Parcel No: 0827201003 0829. BEG 2242.2 FT N &46 FT E FR SE COR OF NW 1/4 SEC 27 T 1N R. 1W SLM; S 65 FT; E 134 FT; N 65 FT; W 134 FT TO BEG.0.2 AC.. 8298-9002 9115-8731. 1282 N Redwood Rd. Parcel No: 0827201004 0829. BEG 2242.2 FT N &46 FT E FR SE COR OF NW 1/4 SEC 27 T 1N R. 1W SLM; S 65 FT; E 134 FT; N 65 FT; W 134 FT TO BEG. 0.2 AC.. 8298-9002 9115-8731 1274 N Redwood Rd. Parcel No: 0827201004 0829. BEG 2242.2 FT N &46 FT E FR SE COR OF NW 1/4 SEC 27 T 1N R. 1W SLM; S 65 FT; E 134 FT; N 65 FT; W 134 FT TO BEG.0.2 AC.. 8298-9002 9115-8731. Amok 1260 N Redwood Rd. Parcel No: 0827201006 0829. BEG 126.8 RDS N &46 FT E FR CEN SEC 27, T 1N, R 1W, S L M;. E 244.38 FT; N 4^ W 142.31 FT; N 8.3 FT;W 100 FT; S 65 FT;. W 134 FT; S 85 FT TO BEG. 0.62 AC. 3901-0470 8298-9003. 9115-8731. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM#2010-00328, a request by Mayor Ralph Becker, applicant, for a zoning map amendment for five parcels located between 1260 North and 1306 North Redwood Road. The applicant specifically requests to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Map from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential District) to OS (Open Space) so the properties may provide a supportive use for the abutting City Golf Courses. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Room 315 City & County Building 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Nole Walkingshaw at 535-7128 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at nole.walkingshaw@slegov.com People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to attend this hearing. Accommodations may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids. This is an accessible facility. For questions, requests, or additional information, please contact the Planning Division at (801) 535-7757; TDD (801) 535- 6021. Name STONEWOOD PROPERTIES UTAH GREEN LLC Addressl PO BOX 711 6915 S 900 E ,ss2 DALLAS,TX 75221- MIDVALE, UT 84047-1201 MOWER, CLARK M LEMASTER,ALAN & LYNETTE;JT PUCKETT, BILL D & LEMASTER, 5509 W MOUNTAIN VIEW DR 412 WESTWOOD RD LYNETTE;JT MOUNTAIN GREEN, UT 84050 PARK CITY, UT 84098-5607 412 WESTWOOD RD PARK CITY, UT 84098 KEYES, LILIANA R JOHNSON, DAVID P & PENNY E; JT NIELSON, KATHY M 225 W 300 N 1402 N BARONESS PL 1410 N BARONESS PL SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84103-1109 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1402 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1402 NARVAEZ, GUILLERMO G & PARRA, MILLET, QUINN JONES, DONALD P& DEBRA M MARIA;JT 1419 N BARONESS PL 1426 N BARONESS PL 1418 N BARONESS PL SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1401 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1402 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1402 ESPINOZA,TEODORO P& MARIA S;JT MC COMAS, DON E & LILLIAN GODINEZ, MONICA 1427 N BARONESS PL 1434 N BARONESS PL 1435 N BARONESS PL SAl T LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1401 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1402 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1401 BELTRAN,JOSE L&AMADOR, MARTHA MELLEN, SHARON E MORALES, ARMANDO R B; TC 1450 N BARONESS PL 1729 W BARONESS PL 1442 N BARONESS PL SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1402 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1460 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1402 TULIC, HAJRUDIN &SEHIDA; TC CAMARENA,JOSE & MARICELA; JT KOVACEVIC, VLADO & KOSA;JT 1737 W BARONESS PL 1418 N BLOOMFIELD PL 1281 N CAROUSEL ST SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1460 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1406 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1607 BUTCHER, ROY E & SHARON L;JT JACOBS, G RICHARD & CONSTANCE LLOYD, GREGORY J 1297 N CAROUSEL ST LEE;JT 1319 N CAROUSEL ST SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1607 1309 N CAROUSEL ST SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 VINCENT, DIANE & MARCELLA;TRS STEVENSON, CHERYL A OLSEN, KORY S 1320 N CAROUSEL ST 1327 N CAROUSEL ST 1339 N CAROUSEL ST SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 C., THRA, GEORGE D & CANDACE L; JT BRADLEY, LOLA H;TR EYRE, BRUCE M. & VERA S. 1547 W DUPONT AVE 1552 W DUPONT AVE 1562 W DUPONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3651 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3651 WALLACE, MELINDA S MIAK, SARAH SIMUNOVIC,ZEUKO & SANDRA;JT 1709 W JOUST CT 1710 W JOUST CT 1714 W JOUST CT SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 KIM,JUNG JIN & DONG SUK; TC RUIZ, CUAUHTEMOC & ROSA;JT BREMSER, LANCE N & HICKS, BRADLEY 1717 W JOUST CT 1722 W JOUST CT C;JT SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 1725 W JOUST CT SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 MAYEDA, DIANA R CISNEROS,JOSE A&ANGELINA;JT FITCHETTE, MIRANDINE & MICHAEL J; 1726 W JOUST CT 1729 W JOUST CT JT SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 1730 W JOUST CT SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 145455 1260 N REDWOOD RD 1306 N REDWOOD RD SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5455 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1426 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1441 ALLEN, HELEN J EMERICK, DOUGLAS C&JOAILENE S; LANDEN PROPERTIES II, LLC 1389 N REDWOOD RD TRS 13 E WANDERWOOD WY SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1438 1555 W SUNSET DR SANDY, UT 84092 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3660 ELKSTONE LC HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SALT LAKE MILLER, ALICE; TR 2302 W COUNT FLEET CT CITY 8509 S 2390 W SOUTH JORDAN, UT 84095-8361 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST WEST JORDAN, UT 84088-9592 SOUTH SALT LAKE, UT 84115-1816 NORTHPOINT APARTMENTS ROSE PARK GOLF COURSE CAMBRIDGE COVE APARTMENTS 1329 N REDWOOD RD 1386 N REDWOOD RD 1720 W 1300 N Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 7-ELEVEN STORE#27330B BELMED COLLECTIONS RAULYCH-SERVICE 1285 N REDWOOD RD 1265 N REDWOOD RD #421 1351 N REDWOOD RD 445 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 LUXE DESIGN & EVENTS BY JUSTINE Residents Residents 1329 N REDWOOD RD #16 1742 W BARONESS PL 1730 W BARONESS PL Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1459 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1459 Residents Residents Residents 1721 W BARONESS PL 1384 N REDWOOD RD 1384 N REDWOOD RD #A Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1460 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1441 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1441 Residents Residents Residents 1384 N REDWOOD RD #B 1384 N REDWOOD RD #C 1754 W 1300 N ake City, UT 84116-1441 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1441 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1477 Residents Residents Residents 1768 W 1300 N 1265 N REDWOOD RD #BLDG 2 1265 N REDWOOD RD #BLDG 4 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1478 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1425 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1425 Residents Residents Residents 1718 W JOUST CT 1379 N REDWOOD RD 1721 W JOUST CT Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1438 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Residents 1713 W JOUST CT Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Name HAYDEN, B LYN &JAY, CHADWICK V; STONEWOOD PROPERTIES Addressl TRS(PJRLTR) PO BOX 711 Address2 PO BOX 146 DALLAS,TX 75221- SHAWNEE, CO 80475-0146 UTAH GREEN LLC UTAH GREEN LLC FIEFIA,TANIELA K 6910 S 900E 6915 S 900E 5220 W 700 S MIDVALE, UT 84047-1202 MIDVALE, UT 84047-1201 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104-4416 DENNER,JOSEPH P HAMMERSCHMID, CHARLES D & DEBRA BECK, LI 1227 N CAROUSEL ST L; JT 1261 N CAROUSEL ST SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1607 1249 N CAROUSEL ST SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1607 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1607 KOVACEVIC, VLADO & KOSA;JT BUTCHER, ROY E &SHARON L; JT JACOBS, G RICHARD& CONSTANCE LEE; 1281 N CAROUSEL ST 1297 N CAROUSEL ST JT SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1607 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1607 1309 N CAROUSEL ST SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 LLOYD, GREGORY J STEVENSON, CHERYL A SALT LAKE CITY 1319 N CAROUSEL ST 1327 N CAROUSEL ST PO BOX 145455 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5455 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SALT LAKE 1260 N REDWOOD RD 1306 N REDWOOD RD CITY SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1426 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-1441 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST SOUTH SALT LAKE, UT 84115-1816 PRIME REALTY AND INVESTMENTS ROSE PARK GOLF COURSE JORDAN RIVER PAR 3 1237 N CAROUSEL ST 1386 N REDWOOD RD 1200 N REDWOOD RD Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 CAMBRIDGE COVE APARTMENTS PRIME HOLDINGS LLC 7-ELEVEN STORE #27330B 1720 W 1300 N 1237 N CAROUSEL ST 1285 N REDWOOD RD Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 BELMED COLLECTIONS UTAH GREEN LLC Residents 1265 N REDWOOD RD #421 1153 N REDWOOD RD 1384 N REDWOOD RD Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1441 Residents Residents Residents 1384 N REDWOOD RD #A 1384 N REDWOOD RD #B 1384 N REDWOOD RD #C Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1441 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1441 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1441 Residents Residents Residents 1754 W 1300 N 1768 W 1300 N 1109 N REDWOOD RD ake City, UT 84116-1477 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1478 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4331 Residents Residents Residents 1121 N REDWOOD RD 1125 N REDWOOD RD 1141 N REDWOOD RD Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4330 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4380 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4333 Residents Residents Residents 1175 N REDWOOD RD 1189 N REDWOOD RD 1205 N REDWOOD RD Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4334 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4335 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4337 Residents Residents Residents 1211 N REDWOOD RD 1241 N REDWOOD RD 1249 N REDWOOD RD Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4336 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1425 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1425 Residents Residents Residents 1265 N REDWOOD RD #BLDG 2 1265 N REDWOOD RD #BLDG 4 1269 N CAROUSEL ST Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1425 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1425 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-1607 M NA()EYO pU BL L cL5 -Goa' Du MJ Luc qo otvi) i2RY S'Iri so. LaJ 2375 j:r quo e- Fc�. 60x (154(00 sto— LNZI COY) UT ei-10.6 3 LT LA cry U-i &4/11 Terry Thomas Elke Phillips Cabot Nelson 1848 Stallion Lane 839 S Washington Street 984 Simpson Ave Salt Lake City UT 84116 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Brad Bartholomew Thomas Mutter 871 N. Poinsettia Dr. 228 EAST 500 SOUTH Salt Lake City UT 84116 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Angie Vorher Esther Hunter, 1988 Sir James Dr. East Central & Univ. CC Salt Lake City UT 84116 1049 Norris Place Salt Lake City UT 84152-1809 Gordon Storrs DeWitt Smith 223 North 800 West 328 E. Hollywood Ave. Salt Lake City UT 84116 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Mike Harman 1044 West 300 South Salt Lake City UT 84104 Ark Randy Sorenson George Kelner 1184 S. Redwood Dr. 1000 Military Drive Salt Lake City UT 84104-3325 Salt Lake City UT 84105 Katherine Gardner Mark Brinton 606 De Soto St 1869 Logan Ave Salt Lake City UT 84103 Salt Lake City UT 84108 Jim Jenkin Pete Taylor 212 5th Ave 933 S. 2300 E. Salt Lake City UT 84103 Salt Lake City UT 84108 Gene Fitzgerald Ellen Reddick 1385 Butler Ave 2177 Roosevelt Ave Salt Lake City, UT 84102 Salt Lake City UT 84108 D. Christian Harrison R. Gene Moffitt Community Council 336 W. Broadway,#308 1410 Chancellor Way Last update from CC website 12.1.10 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Salt Lake City UT 84108 Salt Lake City Planning Commission 451 S State Street,Room-406 PC Box 145480 - Salt Lake City,Utah 84114 5480 : :_.._..:-<___ S. __ OS/2:2/201 O 04 07 AM RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED aa-+'E. 7Jl T ' A eY1T(t .k,tq ILIV t()j,_,,i0 C : c5.. - ...A, Ti{,vary: 1 ' s, yr .,21.1 0}t.Lr: '`.,'r - _- -- ' `- Salt Lake City Planning Division 451 S State Street, Room 406 u) sl s_ II0LJJJlJf CEP?E 20i o PD Box 145480 r MAll Lt)Plturvl fir soul, s.,l l 1 6 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5480 a • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • INFORMATION TO APPLICANTS AND CITIZENS 1. Attendance:Applicant or representative must be present during the meeting or the case will not be reviewed. 2. Decision Making Process:Planning Commission will nevi- a time and receive information from the applicant,professional staff,adjoining neighbors and citizens.After reviewing the case,the Pla will deliberate on the case in executive session.No additional testimony will be accepted during the e\erutive cession,unless requested or clarification purposes.The Planning Commission will make their decision by making a motion,second,discussion and majority vote , ... Cor .,., _ 3. Appeals process:Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Planning Commission may appeal that decision to the Salt Lake City Land Use Appeals Board within thirty(10)days after the Planning Commission final decision. 4. Meeting notices:Meeting notices are made available 12days in advance.If persons wish to submit written comments they should be directed to the Planning Commission or Planning Staff member indicated at least 7 days in advance to enable the Commissioners to consider those written comments.Comments should be sent to: Salt Lake City Planning Commission PO Box 145480 • • Salt Lake City,UT 84114-5480 Physical Address:451 S State Street,Room 406 Salt Lake City,UT 84111 NOTE: Please turn off cellular phones during the meeting. We comply with all ADA guidelines. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to attend this meeting. Accommodations may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary,aids. This is an accessible facility. For questions, requests, or additional information, please contact the Planning Commission Secretary at 535-6171 regarding this agenda or ADA accommodations. TDD 535-6220. 4770 S. 5600 W. P.O.BOX 704005 t` be cult gnke Z3 ibune MEDIAMEDIA9ge Deseret News NEST VALLEY CITY;UTAH 84170 'AWN'n'SLIRIB COM A NEV,IAPEP AOE1•CY COMPA1.Y „,, °;1,<INEM'S CO, FED.TAX I.D.#87-0217663 PROOF OF PUBLICATION CUSTOMER'S COPY Allit -= .a ° t S.WKOAVIEt TD_= 5gtt ig:,. . A06.O T 014,13 . .7 .^t. 4:. -y 0*000, PLANNING DIVISION, 9001394298 10/5/2010 PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 PLANNING DIVISION, Wvs seta.. ,( ','---- -_ kt *--' -;zY�=t',.��i+.� `. ,.�1 g 0E-- -l's ''-li vi i."kr; .r .=- dL':-3.$.a,"41' :Frd 4,44*--:tv" .z TA '`�n_'�`, - ,Pi,:a'Y' _t��''.'4 ..e-E4' ' 8015356184 0000624179 / : <;' '- 2`, Y . ` k i S.. x,{x... •.. ..... • Irr-�''Y Pitr: r 74-"A-"514 r trA,-T .T. Start 10/04/2010 End 10/04/2010 4 4,4 "`'i�•*^r .. ` '� .A-'p�� ':CI�S�I'_R�Pi�'�`I`IQ.f.:�:� ��: f-A 3�:, � �= ��..,�'Mt•�f=:;&� x' t.F'3s t`rdhA'k'?£-� V-'ai�• et- '}: '.�F4's'a.�i"+%'%.r�".r,. c;jf: �:-:.;y, *r. fir. �... -t_ . Hearing 10/13/10 t-Z-1-s1-_i: - �``i•,13 • t.=%*11 - =k-t`-'s_='; «===-GAITION=`F ''4 -'""'k111� +.A 0 _� __._. Salt Lake City Ordinance Amendment - ) . On October 13,the Salt Lake City Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to consider making recom ndations to On October 13, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission will hold a public i the City Council regarding the following petit' 1.Ordinance extension: A request by Salt Mayor ?�--,-x%_ -r-«;->'-;.^"'= Ralph Becker to extend Ordinance 74 of 20 period _, :- -'>; : .: "?x'- - -, ?...',..-- ;,i�y, __ -_--;•-:{ IZE p.-'rt1 ',``'•-,,,fi„;. - .esc of 5 years. Ordinance 74 of 2006 created an expedited re- view`x' + s.�. _-;`?s�-+:�'=`"'=t�_ .. _ '"'� Y•r'''' '" ' '' 'E�'" view process for temporary construction related activities in ~ � t a portion of the Downtown area,which Is bounded by North 39 Lines 2,00 COLUMN Temple Street,600 South,Interstate 15 and 200 East The Ordinance grants the authority to City Administrative Staff to modify certain City regulations for construction activities pur- `.z•v_`R i * _ri k - 15. n ,,.s '.t suant to petition titio n Toed b0 061;32 Located Staff Coup it Nick `•_•r..-;.,Sid'.' mil- Ss1r'.,-'s .!-. ..'.s#__IVlEC�"_4- ,'r`w,-,Y`„','`.,=x' ., r'�'''' 's ,..z `i',•- :�,A, r,.:':%mot•, ` ;r1r,e;. Nor F p Y t "�::� k � �1" ;..'�- _��tin:4�''=z=-�$__ _ ..f.. - ''"-'-ems�-�'_��-=-'�� _ - "'��'� Norris at'801-535-6173 or nlck.norrisQslcgov.com) 3 2. PWPCM2010-00328 Zoning Mop Amendment for Open Space(OS)-A petition Initiated by the Moyor Ralph Becker for the rezone of five parcels between 1260 North and 1360 orth od Road to and ��--r�.fr'� r. .;, ,;;- -;r.a= - .:01"«'• -i 11 ti:^_ _ E--_,;-�Y j_a$_w1g owned NRo a Pork ogolf course,and the aJordand nrRi eove rhParin3 e City ' `...:2.7,- z,, $~A sz-T-,s"x_ `-� � "y 3� GE*S3`rr '� =-i golf course. The requested rezone by the Mayor Is from S . q'x.7:� ..y.asVES ;`";}.rf,-.��-u.-3,,`ve ..<' �":'':$''y' .•F, ssY..;-.1 v:; s 9 q �`-" � � = � gle Family Residential(R-1/7,000)to Open Space(OS). The property is located within City Council District 1,represented by Carlton Christensen, and located within the Rose Park Community Council, chaired by Brad Bartholomew. (Stall contact:Note Walkingshaw at 801-535-7128 or nole.walkln show slc ov.com;Daunte Rushton at dounte.rushton@slcgov. 'x' '�'i�r•= `a;.:s'`I� T"sAZ'�'-'Os�7'-�.,- s Ser.o-s,gam) 9 `3,F<. "=:.4+: :-`tilz-tyr?s;.>.',r="t-tew u'e Y: ?.4- w The public hearing will begin at 5:45 p.m.in room 326 0l the City County Building,451 South Stole Street,Salt Lake 102.50 City,UT.For more Information or for special ADA accommo cations, which may Include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids or additional information, pleas( contact Casey Stewart at 535-6260 or call TDD 535-6220.22 624179 XLP AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION AS NEWSPAPER AGENCY CORPORATION LEGAL BOOKER,I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED ADVERTISEMENT OF Salt Lake City Ordinance Amendment On October 13.the Salt Lake City Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to consider making recommendations to the FOR PLANNING DIVISION.WAS PUBLISHED BY THE NEWSPAPER AGENCY CORPORATION,AGENT FOR THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE AND DESERET NEWS,DAILY NEWSPAPERS PRINTED IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE WITH GENERAL CIRCULATION IN UTAH,AND PUBLISHED IN SALT LAKE CITY,SALT LAKE COUNTY IN THE STATE OF UTAH.NOTICE IS ALSO POSTED ON UTAHLEGALS.COM ON TI-lE SAME DAY AS THE FIRST NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION DATE AND REMAINS ON UTAHLEGALS.COM INDEFINATELY. End 10/04/2010 !`' (�`''�' Start 10/04/2010 y - . i- . n,r rI' 0' ;It PUBLISHED ON a , ,rrr,,,5-'1r5 G' 'flf` { ^"4'°a",. SIGNATURE 7 ' 7 10/5/2010 N THIS 1S NOT A STATEMENT BUT A "PROOF OF PUBLICATION" PLEASE PAY FROM BILLING STATEMENT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ` North Redwood Road (OS) Zoning Ma Amendment PLNPCM2010-00328 (R-1/7,000) to (OS) at �.,,,c' ,• 1260-1306 North Redwood Road Planning and Zoning Division October 13, 2010 Department of Community and Economic Development Applicant: Request Mayor Ralph Becker Mayor Ralph Becker is requesting a zoning map amendment for five parcels on Staff: Redwood Road between 1260 North and 1306 North Redwood Road. The Nole Walkingshaw, amendment would provide for a rezone from the parcels existing usage as nole.walkingshaw@slcgov.com Single-Family Residential (R-1/7,000) to Open Space (OS), and would be used (801) 535 shto to expand and im rove both the Rose Park and Jordan River Par 3 Golf Daunte Rushton p p Daunte.rushton@slcgov.com Courses. Tax ID: 1260 North=08-27-201-006; Staff Recommendation 1274 North=08-27-201-005; 1282 North=08-27-201-004; Based on the findings listed in the staff report, it is Planning Staff's opinion that 1292 North=08-27-201-003; a zoning map amendment for the provision of Open Space (OS) would 1306 North=08-27-201-002. contribute to the vision and purposes of the Northwest Master Plan, contribute Current Zone: to the purpose of Salt Lake City Corporation's Open Space District (OS), and R-1-7,000: Single-Family that the Planning Commission should forward a favorable recommendation to Residential District the City Council. Master Plan Designation: Northwest Jordan River/Airport Master Plan; Parks/Open Space designation. Council District: Council District 1 Carlton Christensen Community Council: Rose Park Brad Bartholomew Lot Size: Total: 114,998.4 square feet or 2.64 Acres Current Use: Vacant/Undeveloped PLNPCM2010-00325 North Redwood Road OS Amendment Published Date: October 5,2010 1 VICINITY MAP V 'E�St' ;:,, - it it. • - • ,per:' t •, �_ _ b � * �'• 37V few �� J�.aii j-a t- - ^ :+J f f �r , '• N __ a ,,. , �� ii,Alt. ," iv "4a� F-ice ., 1 r a.�>tt.--„ , .' f { t f✓ It Kv. •�' w '''':fit.-.4!;;:• '.;.i;'-4... '-'7':;..r')-..'.'' -- .11411..',444 i: -.' .'"':. 41 ;''t '0. 1p„,I16 ,„..-t . ‘. '..t. . ...•', -i . �r ,yam! r - -i 1 Y' r V4d► ;. � Aci ' ea,,, l ? tj .: -...3,,-.:, ( {• • lt. _^ Background Project Description On May 24, 2010, Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker initiated a rezone request for five parcels between 1260 North and 1306 North Redwood Road, from Single-Family Residential (R-1/7,000) to Open Space (OS). This rezone will include the properties of 1260 North Redwood Road, 1274 North Redwood Road, 1282 North Redwood Road, 1292 North Redwood Road, and 1306 North Redwood Road. The Northwest Community Master Plan identifies the five parcels with the future land use of Parks/ Open Space. The five parcels are located immediately South of the Rose Park Golf Course, and immediately North of the Jordan River Par 3 Golf Course; both are zoned as an Open Space District (OS), and identified within the Northwest Community Master Plan with the future land use designation of Parks/Open Space. Approval of the zoning map amendment to Open Space (OS) would allow Salt Lake City Corporation to expand and improve both golf courses. The physical characteristics of the five parcels are undeveloped, and vacant of any structure. On December 3, 2008, a demolition permit was issued for removal of one (1) single-family dwelling unit from each of the five parcels. On April 3, 2009, inspections were conducted for each of the five parcels which confirmed that the dwellings had been demolished, the land was flattened, and that the debris had been removed. Prior to the demolitions, zoning comments reported that no replacement use is planned for any of the five parcels. PLNPCM2010-00328 North Redwood Road OS Amendment Published Date: October 5,2010 3 • Scope of Review: The five parcels proposed for the re-zone from Single-Family Residential (R-1/7,000) to Open Space (OS) will be subjected to the standards of approval for zoning map amendments, and must compl, with the Amendments Ordinance. Comments Public Comments On June 17, 2010, the petition was routed to the Rose Park Community Council. The Community Council will not be meeting until September 2010, and Planning Staff has offered to prepare a briefing to the Community Council regarding the zoning map amendment. On July 15, 2010 an Open House was conducted regarding the zoning map amendment from Single-Family Residential (R-1/7,000) to Open Space (OS). The Open House was held from 4:30 to 6:00 P.M in the first floor hallway of the Salt Lake City and County Building; three people signed the attendance roll. City Department Comments On June 24, 2010, the petition initiation was routed to the pertinent City Departments for review and reception of commentary regarding the parcels' history. The comments received are attached to this staff report in Attachment C. In general, none of the departments that submitted comments were opposed to the request. Analysis and Findings Options Alternatives to amending the five parcels to Open Space (OS) shall include those open space uses permitted by the R-1/7,000 zone. Uses of open space deemed permissible by the R-1/7,000 Ordinance includes: Public and private natural open space and conservation areas; public pedestrian pathways, trails and greenways. The provision of the open space uses included within the R-1/7,000 zone may still provide an environment which supports the expansion and augmentation of the Rose Park and Jordan River Par 3 Golf Courses, without the requirement of a zoning map amendment to Open Space (OS). Ilowever, golf activities would not be allowed without rezoning the properties to Open Space (OS). Findings Section 21A.50.050. A decision to amend the text of this title or the zoning map by general amendment is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the city council and is not controlled by any one standard. However, in making its decision concerning a proposed amendment, the city council should consider the following factors: a. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the adopted general plan of Salt Lake City; Finding: Planning Staff finds that the rezone request to Open Space (OS) for the five parcels would be consistent with the policies of Open Space (OS) as identified within the Northwest Community Master Plan. Within the Master Plan, the section entitled "Golf Courses", explains that when renovation of the Rose Park Golf Course is considered, one option should be "relocating portions of the existing golf course alonw" "` PLNPCM2010-00328 North Redwood Road OS Amendment Published Date: October 5,2010 4 Redwood Road". The five parcels proposed for the zoning amendment are located in a unified and unbroken pattern along Redwood Road, and is consistent with the matter of relocation. b. Whether the proposed amendment is harmonious with the overall character of existing development in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; Finding: Planning staff finds that the landscape immediately surrounding the North, East, and South sides of the five parcel area is already zoned as an Open Space District (OS) and occupied by the Rose Park Golf Course and Jordan River Par 3 Golf Course. Both golf courses are to be continued as Open Space (OS), with the future land use designation of Parks/Open Space within the Northwest Community Master Plan. Amending the five parcels from Single-Family Residential (R-1/7,000) to Open Space (OS) would be a harmonious and consistent contribution to the existing character of the area immediately surrounding the five parcels, and would implement the "purpose statement" (21A.32.100) of the Open Space District (OS) Ordinance, which states: "The purpose of the OS open space district is to preserve and protect areas of public and private open space and exert a greater level of control over any potential redevelopment of existing open space areas". In accordance with the "purpose statement"of the Open Space District, the zoning map amendment to Open Space (OS) for the five parcels would preserve and protect the open space areas of the Rose Park and Jordan River Par 3 Golf Courses, allowing Salt Lake City Corporation to augment and improve both City owned Golf Courses for a harmonious contribution of Open Space (OS) to the surrounding area. c. The extent to which the proposed amendment will adversely affect adjacent properties; Finding: Planning Staff finds no indication that a zoning map amendment from Single-family residential (R/1-7000) to Open Space (OS) will adversely affect adjacent properties. The area is surrounded by Open Space (OS) uses, and approval of the zoning map amendment would assist with the augmentation and enhancement of both the Rose Park and the Jordan River Par 3 Golf Courses, and would be consistent with the purposes of the Open Space District (OS) for Salt Lake City Corporation. To the West of the five parcels, and across the street of Redwood Road is Multi-Family Residential (RMF-30). A golf course would not adversely affect the properties adjacent to the five parcels proposed for rezone. d. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards; and Finding: The proposed zoning map amendment is located within the following Overlay Districts: Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District (AFPP); Lowland Conservancy Overlay District (LC); Riparian Corridor Overlay District (RPO). If the zoning map amendment is approved, all changes to incorporate the five parcels into the existing golf courses must comply with the regulations of the applicable overlay zones, and the zoning requirements of the Open Space District (OS). e. The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including but not limited to roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, storm Finding: Planning Staff finds that additional public facilities and services will not be needed for the addition of Open Space (OS) at these five parcels. The Public Utility Review revealed that when the single- family dwellings were demolished in 2008, the sewer laterals were properly terminated, but waters laterals PLNPCM2010-0032S North Redwood Road OS Amendment Published Date: October 5,2010 5 still remain in service between the parcels of 1260 North and 1306 North Redwood Road, and these must be properly terminated and killed at the main to protect the sanitation of the water in the mains. Comments received from the Transportation revision reveals that the driveway access was removed back in 2008 when the single-family dwellings were demolished upon each of the five parcels. The proposal to rezone the parcels from Single-family residential (R-1/7,000) to Open Space (OS) would remove the future reinstatement of the driveways, and removal of the driveways would reduce vehicular impacts to Redwood Road. Notification • Notice mailed on September 24, 2010 • Newspaper posting October 4, 2010 • Sign posted on September 30, 2010 • Agenda posted on the Planning Division and Utah Public Meeting Notice websites '""1, . , PLNPCM2010-00323 North Redwood Road OS Amendment Published Date: October 5,2010 6 mil- i 1 ' \yt • 'f.--1,-----_, .t.. .. .__ 1,04,7,..,, z 1...111.1•111 ::: -.7-------:0. k --N.4__e --.0 c Iiii / if 11•0==provo 1.1-.\,,,, 9 12 )1 : r 0,,,, ,f,/,.. 1.t\,, rA sikite V e liziv i : 7 , , r � ,.. --( ;' _ • 'z' __ B ( . Range ant ' iii� ., (ro ) I,,I , 16.1 it 401 PLNPCM2010-00328 North Redwood Road OS Amendment Published Date: October 5,2010 8 __1....--a.• \ \ •, ,<:_,--_,..„, .‘,....-;,i —if-- . - \ ',...... / ///—.. _,) .. _-r*- \ .. —5' __.,*___1 a 1 \o O C ilt 1, i e57egFlti , \- •l a? -._,. II ,. ....,..„. ... . .. -,..., . . . ,. . ...„ ; 5.. 1 . -,o., ii...„.. ,.... ,..,..„ ..7. . ,...,, / i. ,,,c, ....y , ., ....., _, .. ..........• .... .,.....„ „, ,. „. ....... o r„ .............,, „ . .„ ' .,.... . .. .. i I „ , Range ar --_.i i... 1 C PLNPCM2010-00328 North Redwood Road OS Amendment Published Date: October 5,2010 9 i • • "4i w .. • • Q34 -r,, .... '. ' L t s- � J _ - sly" t'L T 4. -gam -JJt <•�' ,r 1.. iZ .- S �j s`. '+'t t s f"•?.! x `t;f'.f"�' T.sr•.� ,"..!;S P0 r 4,'..,;.-...-•,•.?:,,•-.-,••? . _;`,r' 'rla mow' t.i • i { E (}f , [1 ti: 'II '/()tltj- . 1 ', f _, 1 ti L • J Y {" •R‘,' - •C'V { _ - ;- • • - ems. - _ PLNPC1\12010-00328 North Redtcood Road OS Amendment Published Date: October 5,2010 11 1 u '. Hwy - ' i; it �' r' i' . '. `a� s . , n� i,t -., a jam' . �M • {'' : y'_' A s'a` $• 9 441,.. ` +. t 4 , 4• i. - 1 cad a � ' i--- , a� A , -.. , -- f'F '_ --- -tom; _ _-'----:------ _-. _ -_:-��, •r_... -_.._..� -_ --- - AAISM�B, � F r Ruti • • -- . a '' - ern Vie Iv,, Ct max ., wf 4-' "'-:--_' _..; _ ti It Yi I� • I t . 4 -• _ r. - , 1' �a• Y ->1, - -r .st .-,\ -f'ice`=I. "`` ' '* � ' r • f. '' ',-,v ,' .-r Yam - ;}:, "�f. �. �.. .41,0405, PLNPCM2010-00328 North Redwood Road OS Amendment Published Date: October ,'_010 12 Attachment C City Department Comments Public Utility Review: July 12, 2010- "When the houses were demolished the sewer laterals were properly terminated, however the various water laterals still remain in service. The water laterals for the properties between 1260 North and 1306 North Redwood Road must be properly terminated and killed at the main to protect the sanitation of the water in the mains" Transportation Review: June 30, 2010- "The residential properties (5) were demo'ed back in 2008 and there fore removed the driveway access function at that time. The proposal to change the zoning from R-1/7,000 to OS in conjunction with the Golf Course function should remove future reinstatement of the Driveways and vehicular impacts to Redwood Road. Sincerely, Barry Walsh cc Kevin Young, P.E." The petition was also routed to the City Departments of Engineering, Fire, and Police, who had either no comments, or commentary which held no particular points of interest or problems concerning any of the five parcels. PLNPCM2010-00 3 2 8 North Redwood Road OS Amendment Published Date: October 5,2010 14 AMENDED SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA In Room 326 of the City&County Building at 451 South State Street Wednesday, October 13, 2010 at 5:45 p.m. The field trip is scheduled to leave at 4:oo p.m. Dinner will be served to the Planning Commissioners and Staff at 5:oop.m. In Room 126. This portion of the meeting is open to the public for observation. Approval of Minutes Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of the Director Unfinished Business 1. PLNPCM2o10-00412: Questar -A request by Aaron Dunyon, representing Questar, for additional setback for a building located at 333 South State. The subject property is located in an Di (Downtown) zoning district in Council District 4 represented by Luke Garrott. (Staff contact: Doug Dansie at 8o1- 535-6182 or doug.dansiePslcgov.com) 2. Petition 410-07-57: The Boyer Company is requesting a time extension for the planned development approval of a proposed office building located at approximately 50 North Rio Grande. Public Hearings 3. Ordinance extension: A request by Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker to extend Ordinance 74 of 2006 for a period of 5 years. Ordinance 74 of 2006 created an expedited review process for temporary construction related activities in a portion of the Downtown area,which is bounded by North Temple Street, 600 South, Interstate 15 and 200 East. The Ordinance grants the authority to City Administrative Staff to modify certain City regulations for construction activities pursuant to petition no.4o0-06-32 Located in City Council District Four, represented by Luke Garrott. (Staff contact: Nick Norris at 801-535-6173 or nick.norrisPslcgov.com 4. PLNPCM2o10-00487: Club Limo Conditional Use-A request by Marlon Ramirez for conditional use approval of a limousine service at 62 East Cleveland Avenue. The subject property is in the CC (Corridor Commercial) zoning district and in Council District 5, represented by Jill Remington Love, (Staff: Nick Britton at 801-535-6107 or nick.britton(5 slcgov.com) 5. PLNPCM2o10-oo328 Zoning Map Amendment for Open Space (OS) -A petition initiated by the Mayor Ralph Becker for the rezone of five parcels between 126o North and 136o North Redwood Road to expand and improve the City owned Rose Park golf course, and the Jordan River Par 3 golf course. The requested rezone by the Mayor is from Single Family Residential (R-1/7,000) to Open Space (OS). The property is located within City Council District 1, represented by Carlton Christensen, and located within the Rose Park Community Council, chaired by Brad Bartholomew. (Staff contact: Nole Walkingshaw at 801-535-7128 or nole.walkingsha v 5 slcgov.com; Daunte Rushton at daunte.rushton a-slcgov.com) 6. Apollo Burger, 143 N. Redwood Road—A proposal by Brandon Lundeen for the new construction of an Apollo Burger drive-thru restaurant at approximately 143 N. Redwood Road. The property is located in the TC-75 Transit Corridor District in Council District 1 represented by Carlton Christensen. The proposal requires the review of the following petitions: a. PLNPCM2o10-00516 Conditional Use for a restaurant with a drive thru;and b. PLNPCM2o10-00488—Building and Site Design Review requesting a modification of the 25 foot maximum building setback along Redwood Road and Gertie Avenue. (Staff contact: Arm Valdemoros at(Sol) 535-7236 or ana.valdemoros a slcgov.com) Amok 6:02:06 PM Close of Public Hearing 6:02:09 PM Motion Commissioner Gallegos made a motion in regard to PLNPCMzoio-oo487: Club Limo Conditional Use that the Planning Commission move a favorable recommendation with conditions 1-3 as stated by staff. Angela Dean seconded the motion Vote: Commissioners De Lay, Gallegos,Wirthlin,Woodhead and Dean all voted"aye". The motion passed unanimously. 6:03:18 PM PLNPCM2010-00328 Zoning Map Amendment for Open Space (OS) - A petition initiated by Mayor Ralph Becker for the rezone of five parcels between 1260 North and 1360 North .4414,01 Redwood Road to expand and improve the City owned Rose Park golf course, and the Jordan River Par 3 golf course. The request would rezone property that is currently zoned R-1/7000 Single Family Residential to Open Space (OS). The property is located within City Council District 1, represented by Carlton Christensen, and located within the Rose Park Community Council, chaired by Brad Bartholomew. Chairperson Fife recognized Daunte Rushton and Nole Walkingshaw as staff representatives. Mr. Rushton summarized the petition. The intent was to augment and improve both the City owned Rose Park Golf and Course and Jordan River Park Community Golf Course. 6:03:52 PM Questions from the Commissioners Commissioner Dean asked about the replacement of the homes that have been demolished, stating that typically the Commission would require that of other private developers. Mr. Walkingshaw stated that the homes were demolished in 2008 at a time when there was a project proposal by a private company whose intentions were to do a subdivision and bring in some extra units, but the project failed. The City purchased the property after the demolition had occurred. Commissioner Gallegos asked if the developer paid the fee from the demolition. Salt Lake Planning Commission Minutes, October 13, 2010 Page 6 Mr. Walkingshaw stated that they had, but was unsure of the numbers and how it was recovered or recaptured. 6:05:13 PM Public Hearing No one chose to speak 6:05:15 PM Close of Public Hearing 6:05:26 PM Motion Commissioner Dean made the motion in regard to PLNPCM2010-00328 Zoning Map Amendment for Open Space (OS) she moved that based on the findings in the staff report, that the Planning Commission forward a favorable recommendation to City Council for the rezone from R-1/7000 to Open Space. Commissioner Woodhead seconded the motion. Vote: Commissioners De Lay, Gallegos, Wirthlin,Woodhead and Dean all voted "aye". The motion passed unanimously. 6:06:13 PM Apollo Burger, 143 N. Redwood Road—A proposal by Brandon Lundeen for the new construction of an Apollo Burger drive-thru restaurant at approximately 143 N. Redwood Road. The property was located in the TC-75 Transit Corridor District at the time the application was submitted in Council District 1 represented by Carlton Christensen. The proposal requires the review of the following petitions: a. PLNPCM2010-00516 Conditional Use for a restaurant with a drive thru; and b. PLNPCM2010-00488— Building and Site Design Review requesting a modification of the 25 foot maximum building setback along Redwood Road and Gertie Avenue. Chairperson Fife recognized Ana Valdemoros as staff representative. Ms. Valdemoros stated that this was a proposal by Brandon Lundeen for the new construction of an Apollo Burger. She stated that the applicant would like to relocate their current restaurant location on Salt Lake Planning Commission Minutes, October 13, 2010 Page 7 Remarks: Petition No: PLNPCM2010-00328 By: Salt Lake City Planning Division Zoning Amendment Date Filed: May 24, 2010 Address: 1260— 1306 N Redwood Road 12LI\fpCM2010-60308. ,,,,, = = ,:41% Petition Initiation Request , 4 , Planning Division Community&Economic Development Department To: Mayor Becker From: Wilf Sommerkorn, Planning Director It Date: May 24, 2010 CC: Frank Gray, Community& Economic Development Director; Rick Graham, Public Services Director; Mary De La Mare-Schaefer, Community& Economic Development Department Deputy Director; John Spencer, Property Manager; Pat Comarell, Assistant Planning Director; Cheri Coffey, Planning Manager; file Re: Initiate Petition to rezone properties at approximately 1260 -1306 North Redwood Road from R-1/7,000 to Open Space. The Planning Staff is requesting that you initiate a petition to analyze the appropriateness of rezoning five parcels of property between 1260 North and 1306 North Redwood Road from Single Family Residential (R-1/7,000) to Open Space (OS). The City has recently acquired these properties located between the Jordan River Par 3 golf course and the Rose Park golf course. The subject properties will be used to augment and improve the City owned golf courses. The specific properties include: 1. 1260 North Redwood Road (08-27-201-006) 2. 1274 North Redwood Road (08-27-201-005) 3. 1282 North Redwood Road (08-27-201-004) 4. 1292 North Redwood Road (08-27-201-003) 5. 1306 North Redwood Road (08-27-201-002) The map amendment will be taken through the formal City adoption process including citizen input and public hearings with the Planning Commission�►��ltypc ivED If you have any questions, please contact Cheri Coffey, x6188. MAY 21t 2010 S ANNLD T 5Y%!/cz,,;.c;c� Salt Lake City Mayor o Page 1 � C ANNEL BY ��Li �/__ DAL : /. t///) MEMORANDUM DATE: March 1, 2011 TO: City Council Members FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director RE: Interlocal Agreement— Salt Lake City and Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT)providing for the rehabilitation of the 1300 South Viaduct COUNCIL PROCESS: The Council will hold a briefing on this issue at the March l s`work session. If the Council is comfortable moving forward, the resolution can be scheduled for consideration at a future formal meeting. If the Council adopts the resolution, the Mayor is authorized to sign the interlocal agreement. If the Council adopts the resolution, the Council must also eventually approve additional funds to provide the local match for construction (see below). The Administration has provided a resolution for Council consideration authorizing the Mayor to sign the attached interlocal agreement with the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) to provide for the rehabilitation of the 1300 South Viaduct. A. The Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) has approved a total of$9.4 million in Federal Highway Administration Surface Transportation Program funds for the rehabilitation of the 1300 South Viaduct. B. The viaduct is the only grade-separated east-west arterial over the railroad tracks between 400 and 2100 South. It carries 4 traffic lanes and one four- foot pedestrian sidewalk. C. Currently there are joint failures and water seepage because of concrete deterioration. Over the past 15 years the City has spent $400,000 in emergency repairs to the deck and walkway to keep the viaduct operable. D. The interlocal allows for the City to use these funds with a required local match of$679,796 (design and construction phases). • The City currently has $289,459 set aside in a CIP budget for this project. Local match for the design phase (which must be encumbered now) is $67,700, which can come out of these currently- budgeted funds. • Matching funds for construction are not due until design is complete and the construction is imminent. The Administration indicates that the remaining local match needed ($390,337) will come from a future CIP application. Practically speaking, approving the interlocal agreement for this project would commit the Council to approving this future budget request. 1 • The Administration indicates that construction will likely be ready to �. commence in the summer of 2012. The Council would therefore likely need to appropriate the remaining local match in the FY 2012 or FY 2013 budget process. B. The Project was reviewed with the three adjacent community councils and at an open house on February 9,2010(notices were delivered to property owners from 1100 South to 1300 South between 700 and 900 West,and on 1300 South between 900 and 1100 West). Additional public meetings will be held as the design phase progresses. Background/Additional Information A. This project will involve rehabilitating the deteriorated viaduct at 1300 South(constructed in 1975)over the Union Pacific and Frontrunner rail tracks,including a full deck replacement,the addition of bike lanes to the structure,girder and bridge joint repairs,partial seismic retrofit,upgraded lighting,and improvements to traffic signals and sidewalks at the 700 West intersection. B. The estimated cost for a full/major seismic upgrade to the viaduct is$17 million,which exceeds the$10 million currently available. The improvements proposed to be made with available funds address the most pressing needs. The Administration indicates that if the girders and deck continue to deteriorate the structure may become fully unusable. The cost to fully replace the viaduct is estimated at$26 million. C. The Administration indicates that additional seismic retrofitting can occur in the future if future funding is identified. • The Council may wish to ask the Administration what risk the City is assuming by not fully seismically-retrofitting the structure. • The Council may also wish to ask the Administration if there are plans for future budget requests to address the additional seismic work that cannot be paid for initially. D. During construction the viaduct will be closed to traffic,although the 500 West intersection will remain open for access to I-15. Note: Changes to the Interlocal Cooperation Act by the 2003 Legislature allow the • Mayor to execute interlocal agreements without approval of the City Council except when the interlocal agreement includes any of the following: • Acquires or transfers real property • Construction of a facility or improvements to real property • Bonding • Sharing taxes or other revenue • Agreements that includes an out-of-state public agency • Agreements that require budget adjustments to the City's current or future budgets • Creation of an interlocal agency 2 - • FEB 17 21 X1 SCANNED TO: E CE SCANNED BY:`�`t SA-�Li' 'Li WIT 6 LAN DATE:1ur7/0/I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR rn CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Il g U FEB 1 7 2011 Date Receive Davi Everitt, f of Staff Date sent to Council �11 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 31,2011 Jill Remington-Love,Chair FROM: Frank Gray,Directo Community&Econo Development SUBJECT: Interlocal Cooperation AgreemenTbetween Salt Lake City and UDOT 1300 South Viaduct—500 West to 700 West,Major Rehabilitation UDOT No. F-LC35(184) Salt Lake City Job No.107010 STAFF CONTACT: John J.Naser,P.E.,City Engineer,801-535-6240, john.naser@slcgov.com • Stephanie Toombs,P.E.,Project Manager,801-535-6374, stephanie.toombs@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign the attached Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with the Utah Department of Transportation(UDOT)for the rehabilitation of the 1300 South Viaduct. BUDGET IMPACT: The Wasatch Front Regional Council administration has approved a total of$9,361,499.00 of Federal Highway Administration Surface Transportation Program funds for the major rehabilitation of the 1300 South viaduct. This Interlocal Agreement provides for the City's use of these funds and requires that the City provide$679,796.00 in matching local funds for the project. The project will be separated into design and construction phases,with the City providing the portion of the local matching funds for each. The City's obligation to pay its matching share for construction of the improvements shall not arise until the City concurs in UDOT's determination that the design is complete and it is appropriate to proceed with the construction phase. The estimated cost of the design phase of the viaduct is$1,000,000.00, resulting in a required $67,700.00 local match. Current City funds are budgeted in cost centers 83-11037: $200,000.00 and 83-07035: $89,459.00. Encumber the $67,700 from . cost center 83-07035-2740. The IFAS number and activity code is 83100311-695. The 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH S4114-5456 TELEPHONE:B01-535-7105 FAX:SC1-535.6005 -an= estimated remaining$390,337.00 in local matching funds needed for construction and right- of-way purchases will be paid from future CIP applications. Upon completion of this Interlocal Agreement,a Request for Qualifications will be issued for the selection of an engineering design consultant. Previous City funding was used to complete and approve the environmental document needed for approval of the Federal funds. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The project will involve rehabilitation of the deteriorated viaduct over Union Pacific and commuter rail tracks,including a full bridge deck replacement,the addition of bike lanes to the structure, girder and bridge joint repairs,partial substructure seismic retrofit,upgraded street and pedestrian lighting,improvements to the traffic signals and sidewalk ramps at the 700 West intersection for improved pedestrian safety and access. The estimated cost of$17,000,000 for a major seismic upgrade to the viaduct,along with rehabilitation of the deck and girders,exceeds the available Federal and City funds. Some minor repairs can be made that improve seismic strengthening,but with current funding,the structure would not meet present seismic standards. It has been determined the most pressing need is the repairs to the deck and girders. If they continue to deteriorate the structure may become unusable in the near future. Additional seismic work on the structure can occur if future funding is identified. The estimated cost for a full replacement of the viaduct is$26 Million,and would include the relocation of water,major stone drainage and sewer facilities presently located under the structure. 4 Construction is anticipated to occur in the summer of 2012. To speed completion of the project and keep within available funds,it is anticipated the viaduct will be closed to traffic during construction with detours established to 900 South and 1700 South. The 500 West intersection will remain open for traffic access to I-15. HISTORY: The viaduct was constructed in 1975 and is a 1200 foot long, eight-span structure. The structure is a major east-west arterial and is the only grade-separated viaduct over the railroad tracks between 400 South and 2100 South. The viaduct carries four traffic lanes and one 4- foot pedestrian sidewalk on the north side. The major problem is deterioration of the concrete roadway surface resulting in joint failures, potholes and water seeping through the deck. There were locations in the pedestrian sidewalk where the holes extended completely through the deck and required emergency repairs be made by the City's Streets Division. Over the past 15 years,the City has spent over$400,000 in repairs to the joints,deck,and walkway. Those projects included bridge joint replacements,new deck drains,deteriorated concrete replacements,girder spall repairs and deck crack repair. The Streets Division has ongoing costs in crack seal maintenance and pothole patching to keep the viaduct serviceable. ` D RESOLUTION NO. OF 2010 Authorizing the approval of an interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Utah Department of Transportation WHEREAS,Title 11,Chapter 13,Utah Code Ann.,1953,allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services;and WHEREAS,the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,as follows: 1. It does hereby approve the execution and delivery of the following: Inter-local Cooperation Agreement-Federal Aid Agreement for Local Agency Project,CFDA No.20.205—between the Utah Department of Transportation and Salt Lake City Corporation regarding 1300 South,500 West to 700 West,Salt Lake,Project Number F-LC35(184). 2. The effective date of the agreement shall be the date it is signed by all parties to the agreement. 3. Ralph Becker,Mayor of Salt Lake City,Utah,or his designee,is hereby authorized to approve said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation,in substantially the same form as now before the City Council and attached hereto,subject to such minor changes as do not materially affect the rights and obligations of the City thereunder and as shall be approved by the Mayor,his execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,this day of ,2010. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By: CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM: SENIOR 7 LT LAKE CITY ATTORNEY HB ATTY-#14849-v1-Interlocal resolution for UDO'f contract I 300 South.DOC a CO 2 ecco rci et- Inter-local Cooperation Agreement .r PARTNERS cacaos State of Utah \:S C Department of Transportation Federal Aid Agreement Maximum Project for Local Agency Project Salt Lake City-Stephanie Toombs Value Authorized CFDA No.20.205 _ $10,041,295 PIN Number Project Number Agreement Number 6621 F-LC35(184) (Assigned By Comptrollers) FINET Number Project Location 52622 1300 SOUTH;500 WEST TO 700 WEST FMIS Number Date Executed LC35184 The Utah Department of Transportation(UDOT)will authorize the Local Agency to proceed on the project upon execution of this agreement providing the Local Agency has complied,or hereby agreed to comply,with the terms and conditions set forth in(1)Title 23,U.S.Code Highways,(2)the regulations issued pursuant thereto,(3)Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-102,A-87,and A-133,(4)Utah State Code,(5)Utah Department of Transportation Local Government and State Aid Project Guide,(6)the Federal Aid Project Agreement entered into between UDOT and the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA), relative to the above project. Federal funds which are to be obligated for the project may not exceed the amount shown herein,without written authority by UDOT,subject to the approval of FHWA. All project costs not reimbursed by FHWA shall be the responsibility of the Local Agency. The Local Agency is responsible for all increased costs to UDOT if the Local Agency decides not to proceed after signing this agreement. No costs are eligible for federal-aid reimbursement until authorized by the FHWA through Form R-709, Request for Federal Aid Project Approval,separate from this Local Agency Agreement. Fund'111, Prior 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Fed Aid State Other Pct Obligations P URB SL $0 $547,034 $536,308 $3,594,873 $5,363,080 $10,041,295 $9,361,499 $0 $679,796 6.77% Total $0 $547,034 $538,308 $3,594,873 $5,363,080 $10,041,295 $9,361,499 $0 $679,796 6.77% 'btto://www,udot.utah.oov/so/stiofundtable Upon signing this agreement the Local Agency agrees to pay its estimated matching share in phases when requested by UDOT. Phases typically include environmental,design,right-of-way and construction.The local match for this project is represented by the percentages of the Total Project Value shown above. In addition the Local Agency agrees to pay 100%of the overruns that exceed$10,041,295 and any ineligible costs when requested by UDOT. UDOT will request payment of matching shares and overruns through an email that will be sent to Stephanie Toombs at STEPHANIE.TOOMBS@SLCGOV.COM the Local Agency Contact.The Local Agency shall pay within 30 days after each payment request.The Local Agency shall make the check payable to the Utah Department of Transportation referencing the project number above and mail to UDOT Comptroller's Office,Box 141510,4501 South 2700 West,Salt Lake City, Utah 84119-5998. Salt Lake City Official Utah Department of Transportation By Date By Date Mayor Ralph Becker Region Director By Date i.., iHM Comptrollers Office Salt lake yCity Attorneys OhioB Date 2—/I^!I • By ! V 1 of Revised 12-7-09 Provisions d. Upon satisfactory completion of the provisions of I. Roles and Responsibilities: this agreement. In accordance with 23 U.S.C. 1060 and 23 CFR 635.105 the Utah Department of Transportation is e. By UDOT, in the event that construction of the responsible for acting on behalf of the Federal project for which this design engineering is Highway Administration in the determination of undertaken is not started by the close of the fifth federal-aid eligibility on all Local Agency Federal-aid fiscal year following the fiscal year in which this projects as described in Appendix C of the FHWA- agreement is executed. UDOT Stewardship Oversight Agreement. VI. Single Audit Act: II. Project Authorization for Federal-aid: The Local Agency,as a sub-recipient of federal funds, The Local Agency,through UDOT, must obtain an shall adhere to the Federal Office of Management and Authorization to proceed from FHWA before Budget(OMB)Circular A-133,Audits of States,Local beginning work on any Federal-aid project Federal Governments,and Non-Profit Organizations, funds shall not participate in costs incurred prior to the htto://w sub-recipient whoov/omb/circulars/a133/a133.h date of Authorization except as provided by 23 CFR tml. A expends$500, 00 or more 1.9(b). in federal awards from all sources during a given fiscal year shall have a single or program-specific III. Agreementprovisions: audit performed for that year in accordance with the g provision of OMB Circular A-133. Upon conclusion of The Local Agency accepts and agrees to comply with the A-133 audit, the Local Agency shall be the applicable terms and conditions set forth in title responsible for ensuring that a copy of the report is 23, U.S.C.,the regulations issued pursuant thereto, transmitted to the Utah Department of Transportation, the policies and procedures promulgated by FHWA Internal Audit,4501 S 2700 W,Box 148230,Salt Lake relative to the designated project covered by the City,Utah 84114-8230. agreement,and all other applicable Federal laws and regulations. VII.Maintenance: IV. Liability: The Local Agency shall properly maintain and restore each type of roadway,structure and facility as nearly Local Agency agrees to hold harmless and indemnify as possible in its original condition as constructed or UDOT, its officers, employees and agents improved in accordance with State and Federal (Indemnities)from and against all claims, suits and requirements. Future utility installations will be made costs,including attorneys'fees for injury or damage of according to UDOT's "Regulations for the any kind,arising out of the Local Agency's negligent Accommodation of Utilities on Federal-aid and Non acts,errors or omissions in the performance of this Federal-aid Highway Right-of-Way." project, and from and against all claims, suits and costs,including attorneys'fees for injury or damage of VIII. Availability of Records: any kind,arising out of Indemnities'failure to inspect, For a period not less then three(3)years from the discover, correct, or otherwise address any defect, date of final project close out with Federal dangerous condition or other condition created by or Government, the Local Agency accounting records resulting from Local Agency's negligent acts,errors or pertaining to the federal aid project are to be kept omissions in the performance of this project. available for inspection and audit by the State and Any periodic plan and specification review or Federal Government,or furnished upon request construction inspection performed by UDOT arising IX. Payment and Reimbursement to UDOT: out of the performance of the project does not relieve UDOT shall not be ultimately responsible for any of the Local Agency of its duty in the performance of this the cost of the project. The Local Agency shall be project or to ensure compliance with acceptable responsible for all costs associated with the project standards. which are not reimbursed by the Federal Government. Termination: For a Joint Highway Committee project,the federal V. V. agreement may be terminated as follows: participation for construction engineering costs is Thlimited to 20 percent of the construction contract a. By mutual agreement of the parties,in writing costs. b. By either UDOT or the Local Agency for failure of Funds requested beyond the amount set forth will the other party to fulfill their obligations as set g reeement. ee execution of a Supplemental Financial A forth in the provisions of this agreement. Agreement. Reasonable allowances will be made for If the project overruns in costs,the Local Agency shall circumstances beyond the control of the parties. of Written notice of intent to terminate is required pay receivingthnthe additional amount Should theeL Local within en days to and shall specify the reasons for termination. ibr the invoice. costs ed the fy fail al reimburse ent, for lf that exceed federal c. By UDOT for the convenience of the State upon reimbursement, federal funding for other LocalCO written notice to the Local Agency. Agency projects or B&C road funds may be withheld until payment is made. 2 of6 Revised 12-7-09 application,the project will need to be re-evaluated by If the advanced amount exceeds the Local Agency's the responsible agency that programmed the project. share of project cost,UDOT will return the amount of Such a review may result in approval of the scope overpayment to the Local Agency upon financial close change,removal from the program,or adjustment in out of the project. the federal aid funds programmed for the project. UDOT shall provide the Local Agency with a quarterly Local Agency is responsible for the schedule of the statement reflecting a cost summary of project costs. project. If the project cannot progress as programmed, the responsible programming agency X. Reimbursement Claims by Local Agency: may advance other projects and require the project to The Local Agency shall bill UDOT for eligible federal wait for next available funding. aid project cost incurred after FHWA approval for authorization to proceed (form R709) and in Any change orders required to meet the terms and conformity with applicable federal and state laws. conditions of the construction contract will be initiated Authorized Local Agency reimbursement claims by UDOT.UDOT will notify the Local Agency of any should be submitted to UDOT Project Manager. such change orders. Reimbursements to the Local Agency for right of way claims are classified as a pass-through of Federal At the Local Agency's request, UDOT will initiate funds from UDOT to the Local Agency. Expenditures change orders that cover betterments. by the Local Agency for general administration, supervision,and other overhead shall not be eligible The Local Agency agrees they will be responsible for for federal participation unless an indirect cost plan 100%of the costs of all change orders on the project has been approved by the Federal government. not reimbursed by FHWA. Xl. Right of Way: XIII. UDOT Service Costs: The Local Agency shall comply with 23 CFR 710.203 UDOT may provide expertise in project management, for FHWA reimbursement requests of real property contract preparation,design plan reviews,advertising, acquisitions. A Local Agency shall not request construction materials verification/certification, reimbursement for excess acquisitions which are not technical assistance, engineering services or other M eligible for FHWA reimbursement under 23 CFR services as needed. Appropriate charges for these 710.203 http://www.porated into s.gov/cfroject funded l costs will be included in invoices to the Local Agency. (6) Property not incorporated i a project funded under title 23 of the United States Code. XIV. Local Agency Concurrence: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this For real property disposals the Local Agency shall agreement,the City's obligation to pay its matching comply with 23 CFR 710.409 and 710.403. The Local share shall not arise until the City concurs in UDOTs Agency should have property management records, determination that it is appropriate to proceed with a which identify inventories of real property considered new phase of the project. Phases typically include excess to project needs. If a Local Agency environmental,design,right-of-way and construction. determines that real property initially acquired as part " Reviewed and approved by the UTAH AG's office of the project is declared excess and disposed of the on September 27th,2010. Local Agency must comply with 23 CFR 710.409 and 710.403. This requires that the Federal share of net XIV. Content Review: income from the sale or lease of real property Language content was reviewed and approved by the acquired with Federal assistance be used for Title 23 Utah AG's office on January 12,2009. eligible projects. Refer to http://wa'w.000access.gov/cfr/retrieve.html for additional information. The Local Agency shall deposit the net proceeds from the sale or lease with UDOT to be applied towards a Title 23 eligible project as authorized by the appropriate Metropolitan Planning Organization or the Joint Highway Committee. For UDOT right-of-way certifications required for advertising access the following: http://www.udot.utah.gov/main/f?p=100:pq::::1:T,V:80 8.34728 XII.Change In Scope and Schedule: 11112 Local Agency recognizes that if a project scope changes from the original intent of the project 3of6 Revised 12-7-09 .mow GENERAL(FHWA)PROVISIONS FOR FEDERAL-AID AGREEMENT 1. General Provisions: The Grantee will comply with all Federal laws and 8.Access to Records: All negotiated contracts(except those of$10,000 0� requirements which are applicable to grant agreements,and imposed by the less)awarded by recipients shall include a provision to the effect that the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA)concerning special requirements o! reciprent,FHWA,the Comptroller General of the United States,or any of law,program requirements,and other administrative requirements. their duly authorized representatives,shall have access to any books, documents,papers and records of the contractor which are direccamin pertinent 2. ModlRCatbn: This agreement may be amended at any tlme by a written to a speck program for the purpose of making audits,examinations, modilicetion propedy ezecoted by both the FHWA and the Grantee. excerpts,and transcriptions. 3. Retention and Custodial for Records: 9. Civil Rights Act: The recipient shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights (a) Financial records,supporting documents,statistical records.and all Act of 1964(P.L.88-352),and in accordance with Title VI of that Act,no other records pertinent to this instrument shall be retained for a period of person in the United Stales shall on the ground of race,color,or national three(3)years,with the following exception: origin,be excluded from participation in,be denied that benefits of,or be therwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which (1)If any litigation,claim or audit is started before the expiration of the the recipient received Federal financial assistance and shall immediately 9-year period,the records shall be retained until all litigation claims,or take any measures necessary to effectuate this Agreement It shall comply audit findings involving the records have been resolved. with Tie VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964(42 U.S.C.2000d)prohibiting employment discrimination where: un itRsco sb efo rre tnaonedx r hree sy eparorpeart,r ita fnoyal required ownith Federal (a)The primary purpose of and instrument is to provide employment,or (3)When records are transferred to or maintained by FHWA,the 3-year (bo)Discriminatory employment practices will result in unequal treatment retention requirement is not applicable to the recipient. f persons who are or should be benefitting tram the grant-aided activity. (b)The retention period starts from the date of the submission of the final 10.Nondiscrimination' The epplicanyrecipient hereby agrees that, as a expenditure report. condition to receiving any Federal financial assistance from the Department (c) The Secretary of Transportation and the Comptroller General !the of Transportation,it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 United States,or any of their duly authorized representatives,shall have (78 Stat 252,42 U.S.C.2000d),related nondiscrimination statutes,and applicable regulatory requirements to the end that no person in the Untied access to any pertinent books,documents,papers,and records of the recipient, and its contractors and subcontractors, to make audits. States shall,on the grounds of race,color,national begin,sex,handicap or examinations,excerpts,and transcripts. age,be excluded from participation in,be denied the benefits of,or otherwise exit be subjected to disremination under any programor activity for which the 4.Equal Employy pent Opportunity: requirements ofnt receives Federal financial assistance. The specific (a) The apppfcation/realoolent agrees to incorporate in all contracts having a requirements the United States Department of Transportation standard value of over S10 000, the provisions requiring compliance with (Civil Rights assurances with regard to the States'highway safety programs FR Executive Order 11246,as amended,and implementing regulations of (his grant ag eement.21.7 and on file with the U.S.DOT)are incorporated in the United States Department of Labor at 41 CFR 60,the provisions of which,other than the standard EEO clause and appable goals for may 11.Rehabilitatlon Act'The recipient shall vimply with Section 504 of the employment of minorities and women, be incorporated by Rehabilitation Act of 1973,as amended(29 U.S.C.794,P.L.93-112),and all reference. requirements imposed by or pursuant to the regulations of the Department of Health,Education,and Welfare(45 CFR,Parts 80,81,and 84),promulgated (b)The application/recipient agrees to ensure that its contractors and subcontractors,regardless,of tier,awarding contracts and/or supplies,or equipment over$10 issuing in otherwise the foregoing statute. It agrees that in accordance with the foregoing purchase orders for material, requirements,no otheise qualified handicapped person,by reason of slue will incorporate the required EEO provisions in such contracts and handicap,shall be excluded from under participation in,be denied the benefit of,or purchase orders. Federal be finled to ancial asisistanice,tion and that it shall take am any m activity urea receiving (c) The ape/leant/recipient further agrees that Its own employment policies to effectuate this Agreement. Y measures necessary and practices will be without discnminatron based on race,color,religion, 12.Govemment Rights(Unlimited): FHWA shell have unlimited rights for th� national origin,handicap or age;and that it has or will develop and benefit of the Government i other work developed in the performance submittto FHWA by August 1 an affirmative action plan consistent with n all the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Section Procedures,29 CFR 1607, this Agreement including the right to use same on any other Govemmen and the Affirmative Action Guidelines,29 CFR 1608. work without additional cost to FHWA. 5.Copeland Act: All contracts in excess of 52,000 for construction or repair 13.Accountability of equipment acquired in poor years will be transferred to the awarded by recipient and its contractors or subcontractors shall include a current year Grant.An update inventory list will be providetl by FHWA. provision or compliance with the Copeland"Anti-Kick Back"Act(18 U.S.C. 14.This Grant is subject to the conditions specified in the enclosed Negotiation 874) supplemented in Department of Labor regulations(29 CFR,Part 3) Document. I D This act provides that each contractor or subcontractor shall be prohibited from inducing,by any means,and person employed in the construction, 15.Drug-Free Workplace:By signing this agreement,the recipient certifies that tcompletion,or repair of public work.or give up any part of the compensation t is to compliance with the Dru Free Work lace Act(41 U.S.C.Sec.701 et to which he is otherwise entitled. The recipient shall report an suspected or g- p reported violations to FHWA. se,�.)And implementing regulations in(49 CFR Part 29),which require,in paof 9rentaes prohibit drug usethe workplace. notify the FHWAf 6. Davis-Bacon Act When required by the Federal program legislation,all employee convictions for violations of criminal drug laws occumng in the construction contracts awarded by the recipient and its contractors or workplace, and take appropriate personnel action against a convicted s subcontractors Doors of more than$2,000 shall include a provision for compliance employee or require the employee to participate in a drug abuse assistance Rh the Davis-Bacon Act(40 U.S.C.276a to a-7)and as supplemented by program. Department of Labor regulations(29 CFR,Part 5).Under this act.contractors 76.Limitation on Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying for Grants in Excess of shall be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less $mitati 0:By signing this agreement the recipient declares that k is in than the minimum wagesspecified in waged errequirlen made by the compliance with 31 U.S.C.Sec.1352,which prohibits the use of Federally Secretary of Labor. In addition,contractors shall be required to pay wages not less than once a week The recipient shall place a copy of the current appropriated funds to influence a Federal employee,officer,or Member of prevailing wagedetermination issued by the Department of Labor in each Congress in connection with the making or Unless modification of any Federal grant, solicitation end the award of a contract shall be conditioned upon the accep- loan,contract,or cooperative agreementni Unless the paymente of funds is lance of the wage determination. The recipient shall report all suspected or otherwise reported to FHWA signing this agreement 1 constitutes a reported violations to the G/CAO. declaration that no funds,including funds not Federally nts ofappropriated,were used or agreed to be used to influence this grant.Recipients of subg its in 7.Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act Where applicable,all excess of$100,000 must make the same declarations to the grant recipient. contracts awarded by recipient in excess of$2,500 that valve the Wth respect to the payment of funds not Federally appropriated by the employment of mechanics or laborers, shall include a provision for recipient and sub-recipients,the recipient must report to the FHWA the name compliance with sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety and address of each person paid or performing services for which payment is Standards Act(40 U.S.C.327-330)as supplemented by Department of Labor made,the amount paid,and the activity for which the person was paid. regulation(29 CFR,Part 5). Under section 103 of the Act,each contractor shall be required to compute the wages or every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard workday of 8 hours and a standard workweek of 40 hours 50036.2-M-34b Work in excess of the standard workday or workweek is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than 1-2 times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours in any calendar day or 40 Form FHWA-1273(Rev.3-94) hours in the workweek. Section 107 of the Act 8 applicable to construction work provides that no laborer or mechanic shall be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary,hazardous,or dangerous to his health and safety as determined under construction safety and health standards promulgated by the Secretary of Labor. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles orinarily available on the open market or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence. 4 of 6 Revised 12-7-09 Exhibit B Project Number PIN Number F-LC35(184) 6621 Project Location FINET Number 1300 SOUTH;500 WEST TO 700 WEST 52622 Language added at the request of Salt Lake City. Language derived from old cooperative agreement boilerplate. Inter-local Cooperation Act Requirements: a. This agreement shall be approved by each party pursuant to Section 11-13-202.5 of the Inter- local Co-operation Act,Utah Code Title 11,Chapter 13,as amended(the"Act"). b. This agreement shall be reviewed as to proper form and compliance with applicable law by a duly authorized attorney on behalf of each party,pursuant to Section 11-13-202.5 of the Act; c. A duly executed original counterpart of this agreement shall be filed with the keeper of records of each party,pursuant to Section 11-13-209 of the Act; d. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein,each party shall be responsible for its own costs of any action done pursuant to this agreement,and for any financing of such costs;and e. No separate legal entity is created by the terms of this agreement.To the extent that this agreement requires administration other than as set for herein,it shall be administered by the mayor of the LOCAL AUTHORITY and the Region Director of UDOT,acting as a joint board.No real or personal property shall be acquired jointly by the parties as a result of this agreement.To the extent that a party acquires,holds,or disposes of any real or personal property for use in the joint or cooperative undertaking contemplated by this agreement,such party shall do so in the same manner that it deals with other property of such party. Duration: The term of this agreement shall begin on the date it has been approved by all parties pursuant to this Exhibit A,and shall terminate as provided in Section V,which termination date shall be not more than 50 years after the beginning of the term. 5 of 6 Revised 12-7-09 uArr 0 Consultant Services Federal Aid Agreement Review/Approval Routing Form STATE OF UTAH TODAY'S DATE 9/27/2010 UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PM REQUEST DATE 2/9/2010 ENGINEERING SERVICES FEDERAL AID AGREEMENT NO. Project No.: F-LC35(184) PIN No.: 6621 Project Location: 1300 SOUTH; 500 WEST TO 700 WEST FINET Prog Code No.: 52622 UDOT Project Manager UDOT Contract Administrator Peter S. Tang Michael R. Butler 2010 South 2760 West PO Box 148490 Salt Lake City, UT 84104 Salt Lake City Utah 84114-8490 (801)910-2003 (801)965-4419 ptang@utah.gov michaelbutler@utah.gov Local Government Salt Lake City 451 S STATE Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Stephanie Toombs, (801) 535-6374 STEPHANIE.TOOMBS@SLCGOV.COM Project Value $10,041,295 Federal Match $9,361,499 Local Government Match $679,796 State Match $0 Please print five single sided copies and route for review/approval to the individuals listed below, using the contact information above. Please sign where appropriate on page#1 in the document before forwarding to the next individual on the list. Please route in the following order: Routing Sequence Date 1 Sent to Local Government 9/27/2010 2 Review/Approved Local Government 3 Review/Approved UDOT Region Director(do UDOT PM) 4 Consultant Services 5 Sent to UDOT Comptroller 6 Review/Approved UDOT Comptroller Revised 8-13-08 **MOTION SHEET BUDGET AMENDMENT#3 ACTION ITEM** MARCH 1, 2011 As a reminder,the Council approved Item A-9 for the Community Learning Center funding at your February 15th Meeting.These motions address the remaining budget amendment items. This first motion adopts the whole budget amendment except for the request for Outside Legal Counsel funding,which will be considered separately: ["I move that the Council"] Adopt an ordinance amending the fiscal year 2010-2011 budget as proposed by the Administration, with the following changes: • Removing item A-5 for outside counsel associated with the Regional Athletic Complex to be considered separately. • Reducing the amount for the Street Cars Project Manager, item A-4, by half per the agreement that the other half would be funded by the RDA. • Approving item A-6 related to the $25,000 request for the Bike Sharing Pilot program with the understanding that the Administration will come back with a full proposal for the roll out and status of sponsorships during the annual budget process. • Approving item A-15 related to the use of bond funds for building projects, with the understanding that the funds will be allocated to an account reserved for to-be-determined City building remodeling and improvements until projects are reviewed. AND This motion addresses Item A-5 related to Outside Counsel associated with the Regional Athletic Complex: ["I move that the Council"] approve Item A-5 related to Outside Counsel associated with the Regional Athletic Complex. • March 1,2011 To: City Council Staff From: Cory Lyman,Emergency Management Subject: CERT Training Budget Q4,2011 In order to continue the CERT training at current levels of service,the emergency management budget will require an additional$7,000-$10,000 from general fund or another source such as raising student fees. The emergency management program is currently training 20 classes(400 students)per year as new CERT Volunteers. The cost of this training is approximately$42,000.The cost of each class breaks down as$920 for instructors,$1,000for 20 Kits,$180for 20 manuals and$50 in misc expenses. Last year the program received approximately$14,000 in student fees and$28,000 from a combination of EMPG and Citizen Corps grants. The office supplies and staff support were covered by the general fund and are not part of the$42,000. As of this writing we have been advised that the EMPG Program Cgrant($12,500)will not continue in Federal Fiscal'11 and we have no indication as to the amount,if any, of the other Federal Fiscal'11 EMPG($15,000)or Citizen Corp($2,300)grants.Current funding runs out March 31,2011. EMPG grant are distributed annually from April to March. The guidance requires that the monies be expended by quarter.Because the CERT instruction ebbs and surges seasonally,we buy additional CERT kits in quarters with fewer classes(...buy more instruction in quarters with more classes). This allows for the quarterly balance of expenses. The Federal fiscal 2010 EMPG grants expire on March 31,2011. No EMPG or Citizen Corp funding has been released for Federal fiscal'11. As a result,CERT training for the final quarter of SLC's fiscal year is currently not funded. • 00 0 0 . CERT Training Budget Fiscal '10-11 II COSTS Units/cla EMPG 4th Quarter April 1 to June 30, 2011 Instructor costs per class 1 $ 920.00 Equipment Student kits Per Student Cost pack $ 50.00 $ 20.00 $ 1,000.00 Instruction $ 46.00 manuals $ 9.00 $ 20.00 $ 180.00 Kit/Manual $ 59.00 misc supplies $ 50.00 1 $ 50.00 Total $ 105.00 Per class Total $ 2,150.00 Classes/yr $ 20.00 Total Costs/Yr $ (43,000.00) $ (43,000.00) 1 REVENUES CERT Grant $ 2,300.00 EMPG Project $ 12,500.00 $ (3,125.00) EMPG $ 10,000.00 $ (2,500.00) Other EMPG GRANTS $ 4,000.00 $ (1,000.00) Grant revenues $ 28,800.00 $ (6,625.00) Student Fees 300 @ $30 $ 30.00 300 $ 9,000.00 _ Business Student Fees 100 @ $50 *depends on agreement $ 50.00 100 $ 5,000.00 Student fees $ 14,000.00 Total Revenues $ 42,800.00 Contingency Unexpended $ (200.00) Assumptions Target 400 Students/year $ 400.00 Classes of 20+/yr $ 20.00 Instructor package(2) primary @ $400.00(2) practical @ $60.00 Total$920.00 $ 920.00 1 $ 920.00 EMPG Funding year is April 1,2011 to March 31,2011. Funds must be used during each quarter year segment O STREET LIGHTING PRIORITY: INITIAL DISCUSSION MARCH 1,2011 At its retreat the City Council identified street lighting as one of the priorities it would address in 2011.Council staff has approached the priority as one that includes short-term and long-term issues.The items below are the first attempt to develop a way to determine how best to understand specific issues. GOALS The City Council wants to look at street lighting in a holistic way,including street lighting policy. OBJECTIVES Determine the specifics of a holistic view of street lighting. SHORT-TERM i. Should short-term funding solution to replace unrepaired lights be separated from City Council policy discussion? 1. How many street lights are either out or unrepaired? 2. What is the cost to replace them? 3. Is the cost the cost of a street light bulb plus other repairs? It should be noted that the Transportation Division has a list of about 75 unrepaired street lights that were reported by people to the division.The division estimates roughly that there may be 400 to 600 lights that need some kind of repair ranging from replacing bulbs to more costly repair such as ballasts,lenses and wiring.The division estimates that repairing 400 would cost about$50,000,and repairing 600 would cost about$75,000. The best potential source to pay for repairing street lights this fiscal year could be fund balance.For the coming fiscal year the Council could consider adding to a Capital Improvements Project allocation request,or request that the Mayor address funding repairs in his recommended budget for the next fiscal year. • 1 LONGTERM . i. Revisit issues explored by the 2008 report Study of Street Lighting Program and Funding Options. 1. There is a desire for increased lighting in residential areas. 2. There is confusion over multiple lighting programs. 3. The"Continuous Lighting Program"is incomplete. 4. Street lighting has inconsistent and insufficient funding. 5. There is no long-term plan for funding capital replacement 6. There are significant disadvantages and City funding inequities with private lighting systems. 7. Street lighting special improvement districts are becoming cost prohibitive. 8. Should Salt Lake City's street lighting program remain consistent with state and regional best practices,or are there other avenues to explore? 9. Do goals for preventing crime and curbing light pollution conflict? ii. Explore other issues 1. How much power do street lights consume? 2. What ways can electrical power,but not lighting can be reduced? a. Has the City explored street lighting innovations? b. Should innovation be tied to any long-term capital replacement program? 3. Can it be quantified how much money can be saved by paying less for energy from upgrades or improvements to street lights? 4. What is the point where replacing street lights with energy efficient lights breaks even and then starts resulting in energy cost savings to the City? 5. Can one replace single street lights with energy efficient lights? ACTION STEPS a. Meet with Administration to determine the status of its approach to street lighting. 2 • i. What did the Administration plan to recommend as a conclusion to the 2008 street light study? ii. What maps are available to help short-term and long-term discussions? 1. All street lights 2. Street lights that need repair b. Research the following questions: i. What might be a uniform way of funding all street lights? ii. Should the City differentiate between street lights and neighborhood- amenity decorative lights? iii. What is the City's core service level?(Intersection and mid-block or • more?) iv. To what degree has the City reached its core service level? v. Is all the money available in a federal energy grant spent? vi. Can the money from it or surplus from other funds be spent on street light improvements or maintenance? • vii. Are any Energy Service Company(ESCO)funds awarded the City remaining? viii. How would the City develop a system where people could pay to replace unrepaired street lights? ix. If the City no longer uses special assessment areas as a way to pay for the installation,maintenance and repair of street lights,what happens to the areas paying a special assessment? x. What happens to neighborhoods where home-owners have paid for decorative street lighting if the City adopts a plan to pay for all street lighting? xi. How do decorative street lights affect perceptions of neighborhood vitality? xii. Do decorative street lights affect property values? xiii. How do street lights and decorative lights fall within the idea of"complete streets"for all modes of traffic? • 3 EXPECTED PRODUCTS • a. Are there any items the City Council would like staff to focus on more than others? b. Are there other items not in the Objectives or Action Steps sections that the City Council would like staff to research? O O 4 MEMORANDUM To: City Council Members From: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director Date: February 15,2011 RE: Council Established Priority:Council Oversight&Internal Controls Staff will be prepared to review the Council Oversight&Internal Controls priority item at Tuesday's Council meeting if time allows. There are several possibilities for the Council to pursue formalizing your oversight role with various City functions,and at the same time,process some necessary amendments to the City Code to: • Assure that City and Taxpayer resources are spent wisely,protected properly,and managed in the best way possible; • Improve Council oversight role and support improvements to various internal control processes through budget appropriations or ordinance amendments; • Pursue changes and carry out oversight responsibilities in the most transparent way possible; and • Achieve budget and resource savings through approved changes(although initial research and implementation would have an upfront cost). Projects could include,but are not limited to: 1. Reporting Requirements 2. Consolidation of fee schedule 3. Streamline business license revocation process 4. Financial Management System a. Payroll b. Internal Controls c. Reporting 5. Contract management 6. RFP process 7. Automation of Systems(agenda,noticing) The City Council Office team members are:Karen flalladay(Lead),Jennifer Bruno,Sylvia Richards, Quin Card,and Lehua Weaver. M Council Priority Items ("Umbrellas") Items confirmed at the Jan.2011 retreat. V , , • Council Communication Efforts: Council Website in progress;Council interviews for Channel 17;Weeklies; aCV E weekly Council meeting reports; w aJ O bo cn (la • Public Engagement: Increased contact with community and stakeholders through mailing lists and listsery emails VI tz to provide notifications/updates on topics,requests for comment,notification of meeting WWW times,etc. IV al • Small Neighborhood business zones, location of alcohol establishments: waiting for transmittal O . " • Parley's Historic Nature Park: Walking tours scheduled for end of January with the Mayor 0 • Historic Preservation Alan: Council staff putting recommended edits into document in revision format for Zi W Council review 0 0 • New Libraries: Library progress,and Council involvement,needs additional community input ^ • Conditional Use text amendments: Council staff to revise the Administration's proposal t‘ �I • Pan-handling: Council closed hearing and direction needed for further work ^b • Demolition Ordinance: Needs Council review of changes to the ordinance,then community input needed • MI � • Resident donations for Quality of Life projects: Council staff prepared to draft ordinance,further Z V' discussion from Council needed. • Street Lighting- Poildeklatirt •F� • 10-year CIP Plan: Administration working with consultant to do updates ..4 • Impact Fee Study: Administration working with consultant to do updates 1 " • North Temple: Construction moving forward,budget steps in progress U '8 • Regional Sports Complex: Pending litigation _11 M • Public Safety Building: Planning/design moving forward,budget steps in progress • Open Space Policy: Pending information from the Administration on Golf projects Qj ^ • Emergency Preparation - Budget ordinances / practices, Work Plan: Council staff preparing work plan, �U • �-1 discussions with Administration on budget pieces • City's Benefits Plan deficit • Council Oversight a Internal Controls PCk Ce O • Street Cars / Trolleys: Planning,budgeting,staffing in progress • Bicycle & Transportation projects: 40 • Traffic Calming - including speed limits, stop signs, pedestrian safety: policy discussion held with pqk Administration,further discussion needed on next steps and action items 4 0 • Sidewalk snow removal: COMPLETE (a • Electric vehicles: Council staff prepared to draft revisions to the Administration's proposal in order to complete 1J N the intent of the Council's Legislative Action • Ground Transportation: NEARLY COMPLETE NAt • Concrete / Sidewalk standards:Council staff working with Administration on audit scope E">\ Printed Feb.3,2011 Project updates as of January 20,2011 • Item A . 7 Please see Item A . 7 • from 2 . 15 . 2011 Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board Appointment: Dru Whitlock INTRODUCTION: Mayor Becker is recommending that Dru Whitlock be appointed to the Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board. If appointed, Mr. Whitlock will serve the term extending through June 4, 2013. APPLICANT INFORMATION: Dru Whitlock resides in Salt Lake City, District Three and is currently employed by CH2M HILL as a Consulting Engineer. Mr. Whitlock is a member of the Water Environment Federation and the Water Environment Association of Utah. He believes that the combination of being an active and engaged citizen of Salt Lake City and being an engineer involved in capital improvement projects provides the expertise to be involved with this board. He feels that he can take a thoughtful approach to providing guidance on capital improvement prioritizing and be resourceful to other board members as well as Salt Lake City personnel. RESPONSE DEADLINE: If you have any objections to this appointment, please let Amber know by February 4, 2011. CURRENT COMPOSITION: The Board is comprised of nine to eleven members appointed by the Mayor, • with the advice and consent of the Salt Lake City Council, to a three year term. Each member must be a resident of Salt Lake City. The board also requires at least one member is appointed from each council district. Priority is also given to include representation of all income levels, ethnic diversity, persons with disabilities, community advocates and business and commercial interests. Current members are: Megan Rogers, District 1; Jordan Jones, District 1; Robert "Toby" Alires, District 2; Eric Waters, District 3; Michael Bettin, District 4; Julia Robertson, District 4; Michael Cohn, District 5; James Schwing, District 6 and Martha Farney, District 7. BOARD STRUCTURE: The Capital Development and Community Improvement Programs Advisory Board (CDCIP) prioritizes and makes funding recommendations to the Mayor's Office and City Council regarding the federal funding the City receives from the Department of Housing and Urban Development - Community Development Block Grants, and Emergency Shelter Grant, and City's general fund Capital Improvement Program. Most of the City's capital improvement requests, ranging from sidewalk repairs to • • entire buildings, are reviewed by this board. The Board also plays a key role in communicating, listening, and directing community council and neighborhood requests for infrastructure. APPLICATION Salt Lake City Boards & Commissions OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 451 S.STATE STREET,ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84111 NOTE, PLEASE ATTACH A RESUME Name: Dru Whitlock Home 892 Northcliffe Dr. Address: Street Salt Lake City 84103 District 3 City Zip Council District Phone: 801.582.1780 801.350.5281 801.244.4074 Drury.Whitlock(&,ch2m.com Home Work Cellular# E-Mail Address Occupation: Environmental Engineer Committee(s), Board(s), Commission(s) Or Authority in which you are interested: .nmunity Development and Capital Improvement Projects Board Reason for your interest in this particular committee/board/commission or authority: I am an active and engaged citizen of Salt Lake City. That in combination with being an engineer involved directly in capital improvement projects gives me the unique combination of passion and expertise. I feel that I can take a thoughtful approach to providing guidance on capital improvement prioritizing and be a resource to other board members as well as SLC personnel. Are you currently serving on any other City committees? If so,which cornmittee(s)/board(s)/com m ission(s)/authority? Salt Lake City Energy and Climate Advisory Committee led by Renee Zollinger Have you had previous contact with the committee/board/commission/authority for which you are making application? No If so,when, and the circumstances? (OVER) munity Service/Activities (past and present): Democratic Precinct Chair,Jordan River Clean-up Day(2010),they Utah Nordic Alliance Volunteer Kids Learn to Ski Instructor Professional Activities: Water Environment Association of Utah Secretary Treasurer,Water Environment Association of Utah Board, Water Environment Federation(WEF)Residuals and Biosolids Committee(RBC),WEF RBC Bioenergy Subcommittee Civic/Professional Organization Memberships: Water Environment Federation Water Environment Association of Utah Ethnic Group(to assure fair and equal representation—answer optional): Caucasian Other Pertinent Information: Please list three references and phone numbers: 1) Jim Schwing,CH2M HILL Vice President,801.350.5245 2) Tom Holstrom,Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility,801.973.9178 3) Rocky Anderson,Former SLC Mayor and High Road for Human Rights Founder,801.364.3560 X117 DATE: 1/13/11 SIGNATURE 01/00 BOARDS&COMMISSIONS 11111 CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT This statement is to be filed by all applicants for positions on regular or special committees, boards,authorities,and commissions of Salt Lake City. I, Dru Whitlock being first sworn,certify that I am applying to (Name) serve on the Community Development and Capital Improvement Projects Board and that the following statements of my financial (List Board or Commission) interests are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. A. EMPLOYMENT Section z.44.o5o,Salt Lake City Code,requires that every person holding any position with Salt Lake City Corporation who is also an officer,director,or employee of any other(non-city) business entity disclose such position and the nature of such position or employment. A"business entity"means a sole proprietorship,partnership,association,joint venture,corporation,firm,trust, foundation,or other organization or entity used in carrying on a business. The following questions refer to your primary non-city job: t. Are you presently employed? X Yes No If you answered"yes"to the above question,please list each of your employment interests: a. The name of the business entity: _CHzM HILL b. The address of the business entity: _zts S.State St.,Suite moo c. The principal activity engaged in by the business entity:_Consulting Engineering d. Your job title in the business entity: _Process Engineer e. The length of time employed by the business entity: _6 years If you answered"no"to the above question,please state if you are retired,unemployed,etc: (Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Over) B.BUSINESS INTERESTS Section 2.44.05o,Salt Lake City Code,requires that all substantial interests you may have in any(non-city)business entity be disclosed. Please fill out only if separate from the above employment information,unless self-employed. T. Do you engage in a business in which you are the sole proprietor(owner)? Yes X No 2. Do you,your spouse or your children own stock in any corporation which,when tut tsidered in any combination,comprises ten percent(torn)ownership of the outstanding shares of said corporation? Yes X No 3. Do you,your spouse,or your children have any interests in any limited partnerships or other business entity which,when considered in any combination,exceeds a ten percent(toga)interest in such business? Yes _X No 4. Do you own any interest in any business for which Salt Lake City issues a business license,i.e.,a restaurant,an apartment building with three or more units,tavern,etc.? Yes _X_No 5. If you answered"yes"to question 4,does the business entity have a Salt Lake City Business License? Yes No If you have answered"yes"to any of the above questions,please state for each business interest: a. Name of the business: b. Address of the business: c. The principal activity engaged in by the business: d. The nature of your interest in the business: e. The length of time associated with the business: f. If you answered"yes"to question 4 above,state whether the value of your interest is: Under Ez5,000 Over$25,000 (attach additional sheets if necessary) I certify that no conflicts of interest exist or that all conflicts have been disclosed in writing on this statement. Dated this_t3 day of January zotr i 44 z/ (Si nature of Applicant or Board Member) STATE OF UTAH s COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) Subscribed and sworn to(or affirmed)before me by ��f Lt vy l) Li.Ky fI U Cbn ihia (Applicant or Board Member) Z day of / zo P"/ r• Notary Public { ' SANDRAA.SCNUT I ;� � ,i-u C, t,taCannyltaDtie { Aida t i pon ea,uanetne I Notary Public,residing in Salt Lake County,Utah m{ I.'• my Coe 2 2011 n State of lJteh J (This is a conflict of interest disclosure statement only. Additional disclosures or restrictions may apply if your financial,business,or professional activities conflict with your city responsibilities.) Board of Adjustment Appointment: Judith Locke INTRODUCTION: Mayor Becker is recommending that Judith Locke be appointed to the Board of Adjustment. If appointed Ms. Locke will serve the term extending through December 31, 2015. APPLICANT INFORMATION: Judith Locke is a resident in District Three and is employed by Schiff Nutrition Group, Inc. as an EDI Systems Analyst. Ms. Locke has previously served as chair of both the Greater Avenues Community Council and the Utah EDI Users Group. Ms. Locke has been interested in serving on the board since her term on the Greater Avenues Community Council ended. RESPONSE DEADLINE: If you have any objection to this appointment, please let Amber know by Friday, February 11, 2011. CURRENT COMPOSITION OF BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: There are five Board of Adjustment members who serve five-year terms. The Mayor, with the advice and consent of the Council, may appoint three alternate ) members to the board, who also serve five-year terms. Alternates serve in the absence of a board member;however, no more than two alternates may sit at any -- - meeting of the board. Current board members are: Tom Berggren, District 3; Ed Radford, District 3; Catherine Dunn, District 4; Kenneth Bullock, District 6 and Rod Julander (Alternate), District 3. BOARD .STRUCTURE: • The Board of Adjustment has the authority to hear and decide appeals relating to decisions made by the zoning administrator; authorize variances from the zoning ordinance; authorize special exceptions to the terms of the zoning ordinance; and make determinations regarding the existence, expansion or modification of non-conforming uses and non-complying structures pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in the zoning ordinance. APPLICATION Salt Lake City Boards & Commissions OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 451 S.STATE STREET,ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84111 NOTE: PLEASE ATTACH YOUR RESUME. Name: -S 0e.V t -I-h Locke Home L,D 7 7 fn Avehoe Address: Street Sa I La I& C '-f-L( L4A,h FSYI o3 City Zip Council District Phone: gdl-5-A(-CH`{to go%' 975-5r3 8' -� ..codifh L@Sch,f xirr/ioai.cc Home Work Cellular# E-Mail Address Occupation: 6D.L Sys ems �►�cc�ysL Committee(s), Board(s), Commission(s) or Authority in which you are interested: �Rnrcd of / ,7s4renL— Reason for your interest in this particular committee/board/commission or authority: P-PeoR a recen f )-e►etrn as 6,9Gc Chal;2 - have m on I Tdi?P6� vacan // � CO km? -or one of hi feresi-r►.? fon feo f (#1 cQ Reseon. thaf f �� 0,70562,z-P work/ schoceote. Are you currently serving on any other City committees? If so, which committee(s)/board(s)/commission(s)/authority? Have you had previous contact with the committee/board/commission/authority for which you are making application? If so, when, and the circumstances? (OVER) Community Service/Activities (past and present): aoog 6Re«1-eRAvenues Comiionl (aonu1 chat //oIun'leek People.- liellowq People. - l-ow in collie- 5,nnyle /71iff�P E,mp(oc�vnenf Pnoy ie4-rnQ eet-tea Avenues COMM()n 1-1- Coon c,'I &e dZ (/`] Pti2s 0 ✓ (�� (Jfah Aces I-vuncPa fTOm'' ( 1r s+) , CeRTa- fl Or q21 n'z_e 7 s Professional Activities: Ens 0seRs 6120cp Cha i'R 1 rvs+act Lin k Ear L2sei5 6 o secre- ' Civic/Professional Organization Memberships: 851 Hess 9- Prv-essioracc.( U9ome() I''Rnater2 A�?nc,es Com 61u11147 (B it CEO?i Ethnic Group (to assure fair and equal representation-answer optional): t�.ma 1 _ Other Pertinent Information: Please list three references and phone numbers: 1) Try) Jer1WEn 0/ 3 - 3750 2) Ph; 1 Carroll , a61- 5 t - kntc>6 3) Tom 6 ei-.1 9 Z&IA) , &O I-3 5.0 -7//7 DATE: 1`'/6//G' 1. 'r% i % e SIGNATURE 01/00 BOARDS & COMMISSIONS CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT This statement is to be filed by all applicants for positions on regular or special committees, boards, authorities,and commissions of Salt Lake City. I, —J u HI I c c..k? (Name),being first duly sworn, certify that I am applying to serve on the go arc c'4 44 h min L (List Board or Commission) and that the following statements of my financial interests are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. A. EMPLOYMENT Section 2.44.o50, Salt Lake City Code, requires that every person holding any position with Salt Lake City Corporation who is also an officer,director,or employee of any other (non-city) business entity disclose such position and the nature of such position or employment. A "business entity"means a sole proprietorship,partnership, association,joint venture, corporation,firm,trust, foundation, or other organization or entity used in carrying on a business. The following questions refer to your primary non-city job: I. Are you presently employed? Yes No If you answered "yes" to the above question, please list each of your employment interests: a. The name of the business entity: Sell)CC 1%fri 46. n 6,2 Inc. ,,Z 00 v`i South 5o 74) 6Jc?sf b. The address of the business entity: 5 cr I t 1.0 ; /UT fs Y/o y c. The principal activity engaged in by the business entity: no'Lr i lio na I Svpo I i 111�y• d. Your job title in the business entity: CQ.L c siems e. The length of time employed by the business entity: /6 y e i r2S If you answered "no" to the above question,please state if you are retired, unemployed, etc: B. BUSINESS INTERESTS Section 2..44.o5o,Salt Lake City Code,requires that all substantial interests you may have in any(non-city)business ,, , entity be disclosed. Please fill out only if separate from the above employment information,unless self-employed. i. Do you engage in a business in which you are the sole proprietor(owner)?_Yes __ZNo 2. Do you,your spouse or your children own stock in any corporation which,when considered in any combination,comprises ten percent(taw)ownership of the outstanding shares of said corporation? Yes i/No 3. Do you,your spouse,or your children have any interests in any limited partnerships or other business entity which,when considered in any combination,exceeds a ten percent(io%)interest in such business? Yes _/No 4. Do you own any interest in any business for which Salt Lake City issues a business li se,i.e.,a restaurant,an apartment building with three or more units,tavern,etc.? Yes V No 5. If you answered"yes"to question 4,does the business entity have a Salt Lake City Business License? Yes No If you have answered"yes" to any of the above questions,please state for each business interest: a. Name of the business: b. Address of the business: c. The principal activity engaged in by the business: d. The nature of your interest in the business: e. The length of time associated with the business: " f. If you answered"yes"to question 4 above,state whether the value of your interest is: Under a25,000 Over$25,000 (attach additional sheets if necessary) I certify that no conflicts of interest exist or that all conflicts have been disclosed in writing on this statement. n Dated this G, day of 1. 2.e_arnaPw ,zo /O . ,rcf'i/Gt �oC,l�� S' ature of Applicant or Board Member) STATE OF UTAH ) :ss COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ll I 1, Subscribed and sworn to(or affirmed)before me by U(11.0\ LC)C, .. on this / (Applicant or Board Member) (D+� day of Df0_ ,zo lA . av,. _ _ N;r1 ZYf P'Rtbiic ° t VfjkkApzd---- ., (No`: . blic,residing to Salt Lake County,Utah • t b.�.i 1` SatI LarKr.'i:'iv'.U ,/84104 4� a- My Ctii 1t;i.cinh Erpirec , r sT;_tcl : 1J,Yoff , E (This is a co interest4ipalosuptaaaternent only. Additional disclosures or restrictions may apply if your financial,business,or professional activities conflict with your city responsibilities.) Judith Locke 407 7th Avenue, Salt Lake City,Utah 84103 801-521-6446(home), 801-975-5138 (work) Career Summary Over thirty-five years as a software engineer in medical and manufacturing environments. Expertise in all aspects of software development, support and maintenance. Recognized for project leadership and interpersonal skills. Professional Experience Schiff Nutrition Group, Inc., 1994-present Salt Lake City,UT EDI System Analyst Senior member of a MIS department. Responsible for sales, financial and logistics systems in a food/dietary supplement manufacturing environment. Manage electronic processing of purchase orders, invoices and logistic documents for a $220 million company. Extensive knowledge of GS 1 standards and AS2 communications. Provide input to EDI application vendors regarding SOX and regulatory compliance requirements. Founding officer of a software application user group, now totaling over 350 members. GTE Health Systems Inc., 1989-1994 Salt Lake City, UT Senior Systems Analyst Member of a $1.2 million custom code and systems interface team. Worked with over 60 hospital personnel groups from various clinical, fmancial and managerial departments; developing business software solutions and interfaces. J. Locke Consulting, 1986-1991 Mansfield, MA; Salt Lake City UT Software Consultant/Developer Rebuilt a primitive hospital laboratory reporting system into a complex application capable of interfacing with more than 10 diagnostic systems and with functionality that allowed users to define their own report formats and content. Education Bridgewater State College, 1972-1976 Bridgewater, MA Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics,Computer Science and Social Science concentrations Professional Associations Inovis TrustedLink User Group, 1996-present,founding member Utah Strategic EDI User Group, 1997-2007,President 2006-2007 Business and Professional Women, 1990-present