Loading...
05/12/1987 - Formal Meeting - Minutes • • PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 12, 1987 THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, MET AS A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ON TUESDAY, MAY 12, 1987, AT 5:00 P.M. IN SUITE 300 CITY HALL, 324 SOUTH STATE. THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: FLORENCE BITTNER THOMAS M. GODFREY GRANT MABEY ROSELYN N. KIRK SYDNEY R. FONNESBECK WILLIE STOLER EARL F. HARDWICK Council Chairperson Kirk presided at the meeting. BRIEFING SESSION #1 . Linda Hamilton, Executive Director of the City Council Office, briefed the City Council on the evening' s agenda. She noted in particular that in the resolu- tion for item F-2, Special Improvement District No. 38-813, three of the five protest- ing streets had been eliminated from the district. All three of the streets were located in Council District No. 2. The other two streets, Fourth Avenue and Berkeley Street remained in the district despite resident protests. Ms. Hamilton pointed out that the Council might want to make clear which streets were to be eliminated when they made the motion. #2. The City Council discussed budget recommendations with members of the Budget Committee of the Salt Lake Association of Community Councils. The committee members pointed out that during their meetings they received a considerable amount of information concerning the mechanized trash pickup program and the proposed garbage fee. They indicated that they felt the program and the fee were basically good and necessary programs, although they worried that the proposed $4.00 per month fee would not be sufficient to support an enterprise fund. They also discussed the recommenda- tion that the City continue to bill for water, sewer, and possibly trash pickup bimonthly rather than the proposed change to monthly because the change would require an additional allocation of $250,000 for overhead costs. The meeting adjourned at 5:55 p.m. 87-115 • PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, U AH TUESDAY, MAY 12, 1987 THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, MET IN REGULAR SESSION ON TUESDAY, MAY 12, 1987, AT 6:00 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SUITE 300, CITY HALL, 324 SOUTH STATE. THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: FLORENCE BITTNER THOMAS M. GODFREY GRANT MABEY ROSELYN N. KIRK SYDNEY R. FONNESBECK WILLIE STOLER EARL F. HARDWICK Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler, city attorney, Kathryn Marshall , city recorder, and Lynda Domino, chief deputy city recorder, were present. Council Chairperson Kirk presided at the meeting and Councilmember Godfrey conducted the meeting. The Council led the Pledge of Allegiance. Approval of Minutes Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Hardwick seconded to approve the minutes of the Salt Lake City Council for the regular meeting held Tuesday, May 5, 1987, which motion carried, all members voting aye. (M 87-1 ) PETITIONS Petition 400-495 by The Garden Centre RE: Requesting Salt Lake City to rezone property located at 2091 East 1300 South from an "R-2" to a "B-3" classification on the northwest corner of the property to allow the area, approximately 30' x 50' , to be used for the seasonal display and sale of garden materials. ACTION: Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Bittner seconded to set a public hearing for Tuesday, July 7, 1987, at 6:20 p.m. , which motion carried, all members voting aye. (P 87-93) DEPARTMENTAL BUSINESS AIRPORT AUTHORITY #1 . RE: An interlocal agreement with the United States of America to increase leased space. ACTION: Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Bittner seconded to adopt Resolution 46 of 1987 authorizing the execution of an interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the United States of America (General Services Administration) modifying an existing lease to add 700 square feet of expansion space to Lease No. GS-08B-10866, which motion carried, all members voting aye. (C 87-249) 87-116 • • PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 12, 1987 PUBLIC UTILITIES #1 . RE: An interlocal agreement with the U.S. Department of Interior to allow for crossing of and connection to the Salt Lake Aqueduct. ACTION: Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Bittner seconded to adopt Resolution 45 of 1987 authorizing the execution of an interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, to allow for crossing of and connection to the Salt Lake Aqueduct, Provo River Project, which motion carried, all members voting aye. (C 87-250) PUBLIC WORKS #1 . RE: Resolution to create Special Improvement District No. 40-R-13. ACTION: Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Kirk seconded to adopt Resolution 47 of 1987 creating Salt Lake City, Utah, Concrete Replacement Special Improvement District No. 40-R-13, State and Main Streets from 900 South to 2100 South along with the connecting streets between them and an area in the Avenues from "A" Street to "E" Street between 4th Avenue and 7th Avenue, and authorizing construction of improvements as set forth in the Notice of Intention and creating the Special Improvement District, which motion carried, all members voting aye. (Q 87-3) #2. RE: Resolution to create Special Improvement District No. 38-813. ACTION: Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Stoler seconded to adopt Resolution 48 of 1987 creating Salt Lake City, Utah, Special Improvement District No. 38-813, curb and gutter extension, non-contiguous streets, and authorizing construc- tion of improvements as set forth in the Notice of Intention with certain modifications and creating the Special Improvement District, eliminating Paramount, California, and Van Buren Avenues, which motion carried, all members voting aye. (Q 87-4) COMMENTS #1 . James Lehmann, 123 4th Avenue, talked about Special Improvement District 38-813 and said 5 of the 6 residents on 4th Avenue opposed including the street in the special improvement district because they didn't feel it was worthwhile. He said the street was a dead end with little traffic and pedestrian use, the street was safe and it was already paved. He didn't think the improvements would be a good use of money. Another member of the audience, who did not give his name, concurred with Mr. Lehmann. Phil Erickson, 116 4th Avenue, said he believed the curbs and gutters should go in because he thought curbs and gutters were basic to the urban lifestyle and would add to the larger community. He thought the curbs and gutters would add to the safety, increase the well being of the neighborhood, and would improve the overall looks of the area. He asked to have input on the design in an effort to get improvements that would benefit everyone. 87-117 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 12, 1987 The meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. -1-d4,1) C L HAIRPERSON 'LVU RECORDER 87-118 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SUITE 300, CITY HALL 324 SOUTH STATE STREET Tuesday, May 12, 1987 6:00 p.m. A. BRIEFING SESSION: 5:00 - 5:55 p.m. , Suite 300 City Hall , 324 South State. 1 . Report of the Executive Director. 2. The City Council will discuss the recommendations of the Salt Lake Association of Community Council 's Budget Committee pertaining to the Fiscal Year 1987-88 Budgets. B. OPENING CEREMONIES: 1 . Invocation. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Approval of the Minutes. C. COMMENTS: 1 . Questions to the Mayor. 2. Citizen Comments. D. CONSENT: 1. Interlocal Cooperation Agreement, Bureau of Reclamation. Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, to allow for crossing of and connection to the Salt Lake Aqueduct, Provo River Project. (C 87-250) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. 2. Interlocal Cooperation Agreement, U. S. General Service Operations. Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the United States of America (General Services Administration) modifying an existing lease to add 700 square feet of expansion space to Lease No. GS-08B-10866. (C 87-249) /STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. 3. Petition No. 400-495, The Garden Centre. Set a date for a public hearing to be held Tuesday, July 7, 1987, at 6:20 p.m. to obtain public comment concerning Petition No. 400-495 submitted by the Garden Centre, requesting the rezoning of property located at 2091 East 1300 South Street from an "R-2" to a "B-3" classification on the northwest corner of their property to allow the area, approximately 30' x 50' , to be used for the seasonal display and sale of garden materials. (P 87-93) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set date. F. UNFINISHED COUNCIL BUSINESS: 1 . Special Improvement District No. 40-R-13, Resolution to Create. Consider adopting a resolution to create Salt Lake City, Utah, Concrete Replacement Special Improvement District No. 40-R-13, State and Main Streets from 900 South to 2100 South along with the connecting streets between them and an area in the Avenues from "A" Street to "E" Street between 4th Avenue and 7th Avenue, and to authorize construction of improvements as set forth in the Notice of Intention and to create the Special Improvement District . (Q 87-3) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. 2. Special Improvement District No. 38-813, Resolution to Create. Consider adopting a resolution to create Salt Lake City, Utah, Special Improvement District No. 38-813, curb and gutter extension, non-contiguous streets, and to authorize construction of improvements as set forth in the Notice of Intention with certain modifications and to create the Special Improvement District . (Q 87-4) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. H. ADJOURNMENT: DATED May 8, 1987 BY C //� /1/ TY E • DRER STATE OF UTAH ) COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ss. On the 8th day of May, 1987, I personally delivered a copy of the foregoing notice to the Mayor and City Council and posted copies of the same in conspicuous view, at the following times and locations within City Hall, 324 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah: 1 . At 5:00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office, 5th Floor; and 2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom, Room 325. `-1/1' ./.1.4.J‘%14.sci CIT RE 0. ER Subscribed and sworn to before me this 8th day of May, 1987. SPRY pv8<0.. IWCHELL Notar blic residing in the MARGAR Stat Utah My Commission Expires: - '�r 9TEOfJ APPROVAL: XECUTIVE DIRECTOR SLACC BUDGET COMMITTEE PRIORITIES, 1987-88 ##1 - mechanized refuse p. 15-16 ##2 - police consolidation p. 13 • #3 - City & County Building/new space p. 7-8 #4 - one-stop counter p. 2 #5 - city billing p. 14 #6 - lobbying p. 2 & 9-10 ##7 - leaf bag program p. 17 #8 - budget process p. 11 .. y.., .ems _,1.,...r..� .sy .i•. K ..t"`.�, �� ...ei n's k.�.. ^Y:,._ rdw.._:., ...n:: . _. .,•s.c ¢r.,aykti.�' .1,.,. ea�'..n'.., -t.- a:-,�ttio -;..S�s�n.e= i+ J.w..v.. SS �dti N .J N Z < o a a o o i- o Z N 0 • O ...IZ W a. < Z Z La — 0 S 0 ...IC.) O C.) C.) < La y o C.) 0 a cc N ) < C < I- J H A a' N W O W Z `' CU t )C 0 0 S < S J S CO O COI- C.) ep J CO N < I W N I. N W z O a N w cc ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE The City should investigate Vehicles have in the past been Joint purchasing with other purchased through the State government agencies when Contract, a practice that will acquiring vehicles for the continue when financially Fleet Management Division in beneficial . The Division Is an effort to reduce costs. also meeting with six other government entitles to establish Joint purchasing specifications and agreements for FY 1987-88. If successful , this program will be expanded . AIRPORT AUTHORITY COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE The Airport appears to be well-managed . We have no specific recommendations. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE Word processing Is a must for The request for word The request for word this office. processing must be approved . processing equipment In the Prosecutor► s Office has been approved , and funds are Included In the Mayor's Recommended FY 1987-88 Budget. -i- CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE Performance audits of all The Council intends to departments should be continue performance audits of continued. City departments. The Council should work with To a limited degree, the the Mayor' s office to develop Council Community Relations state legislation which specialist coordinates benefits Salt Lake City, legislative matters for the especially regarding the state Council . Staffing supremacy issue. This should constraints, however, make It also apply to federal unlikely that additional time legislation . will be allocated to state/federal legislative coordination . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE The One-Stop Counter appears The counter should be The Department Intends to to be a good program for the continued in the restored City continue and enhance the public. & County Building; related operations of the one-stop departments should be located counter. The Department will adjacent to the counter to work to secure adequate office keep staff needs to a minimum. space for this function in the renovated City & County Building. Every attempt will be made to locate the counter next to the various department offices Involved in the one- stop counter. -2- ti DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT (CON'T.) COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE It is important to provide There should be a review of The Department will pursue the information to the public in the printing of studies, possibility of charging for the form of studies, reports master plans, reports and all planning documents. The and other public documents, other public documents. Capital Planning and but there may be a need to Consideration should be given Programming Division will charge for this service. to charging a minimal fee to research HUD regulations There may be some difficulty cover the costs. concerning the revenue status in doing this when CDBG funds and accounting requirements of are used, but all funds gained from the sale of circumstances should be planning documents which were considered. published using CDBG funds. There should be a stricter Additional code enforcement enforcement throughout the staff has been included in the City for sanitary, health, Mayor' s Recommended FY 1987-88 safety and exterior esthetic Budget. appearance. All fees should be evaluated The Department will annually annually so they are evaluate all building permit competitive with other fees, filing fees and other government agencies to cover fees. actual costs. Requests for new vehicles Vehicles should be replaced The Department will continue appear to be warranted. within service and fiscal to coordinate with Fleet limitations. Management to ensure that vehicles are kept in good working condition and are replaced when needed . This is the first year this The CIP budget should be The CIP budget is a critical committee has reviewed the CIP reviewed every year by the element in the total City budget. It appears to be SLACC Budget Committee, picture. The budget should be well-managed , reviewed by SLACC. -3- DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT (CON'T.) COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE Next year there should be Both agencies welcome the separate presentations to the opportunity to make separate SLACC Budget Committee by the budget presentations to the Housing Authority and the SLACC Budget Committee. Redevelopment Agency. Please note that the Housing Authority normally adopts its annual budget in March. FINANCE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE There is revenue being lost An effort should be made to The City will pursue this which could be recovered with extend court hours into the recommendation with the State extended court hours. evening to handle traffic Court Administrators Office. offenders and those with outstanding warrants. -4- FINANCE DEPARTMENT (CON'T.) COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE Efforts should be continued to The City Treasurer has formed have the Business License an interdepartmental committee Division and the Flre comprised of representatives Department coordinate records from Building & Housing, on businesses to maximize Planning b Zoning, Fire, revenue from fees. Police, and the Attorney's Office to review license fees. The committee' s charges are to review the fee schedule Itself, particularly regulatory fees, and to enhance coordination of the City' s enforcement efforts. The Mayor' s Recommended FY 1987-88 Budget Includes Increases in the City' s business licenses fees. The interdepartmental committee mentioned above recommended those increases. Purchasing jointly with other The City and Salt Lake County agencies should be continued have formed a task force to and expanded where ever investigate opportunities to practical . bid jointly on materials. Purchasing Agents of both entitles meet weekly to facilitate this process. -5- FINANCE DEPARTMENT (CON'T.) COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE A priority system should be This recommendation will be developed by the Treasurer' s studied for its efficiency and Office so repeat violators are legality. With the increased taken to Small Claims Court staffing in the Mayor' s before violators with only one Recommended FY 1987-88 Budget, ticket. however. the Treasurer' s Office will become more efficient in taking violators to Small Claims Court. FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE All fees should be reviewed in The City Treasurer has formed relation to the cost of the an interdepartmental committee service provided. They should comprised of representatives also be compared to similar from Building & Housing, fees charged by other Planning & Zoning, Fire, communities. Police, and the Attorney' s Office to review license fees. The regulatory fee includes the cost of fire inspection. Efforts should be continued to The committee is also charged have the Business License with improving the Division and the Fire coordination of the City 's Department coordinate records enforcement efforts, on businesses to maximize revenue from fees. -6- OFFICE OF THE MAYOR COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE Taxpayers are upset with tax Budget requests should not Departments submit a base Increases and revenues are exceed actual expenditures budget for review and projected to be less this year from 1986-87, with very few evaluation. Requests for than last fiscal year. exceptions. Increases are considered individually and separately. Property taxes should remain The Mayor►s Recommended FY at the current level . 1987-88 Budget does not increase the property tax levy. Department managers are in the User fees should be increased The Mayor ' s Recommended FY best position to determine where appropriate; the 1987-88 Budget Implements this where reductions can be made. remainder of the budget recommendation . It contains This committee did not receive shortfall should be covered by proposals for increased information regarding possible a reduction in expenditures. parking and business license reductions, therefore, it Department managers are in the fees, and a new fee for would be Irresponsible of us best position to determine garbage collection. The to make recommendations on those reductions. Budget contains cuts which specific reductions. were based on departmental recommendations. Renovation of the City & Funds available at the The Mayor agrees with this County Building Is progressing completion of the renovation recommendation. A final well , and bonding appears to should be used to refinance determination will be made have been done in the most the bond. when the renovation is economical method . completed. -7- OFFICE OF THE MAYOR (CON'T.) COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE When the City 8 County Although as many departments Building Is completed, as many as feasible will be departments as possible should accommodated in the City and be housed in the building; County Building, it is already departments which are not known that needs exceed located in the building should available space. Since acting be housed in buildings owned now will result in both by the City rather than immediate and long term leased. No additional savings, the Mayor's buildings should be acquired Recommended FY 1987-88 Budget until departments are provides for a new Public relocated in the City 8 County Safety Facility. Building and additional needs for space can be assessed . Since the City is self- The new Human Resource The Human Resource Division Is insured, a large claim could Division should research the researching the possibility of have a catastrophic impact on possibility of obtaining a placing a specific stop loss the budget. stop- loss policy for both policy to protect the health health insurance and the insurance trust fund from Government Immunity Fund. individual claims exceeding $75,000 to $ 100,000. Stop loss insurance for public sector liability claims is not available from the Insurance marketplace. Either the coverage is not offered at all or the price is not a good investment for the coverage available. -8- OFFICE OF THE MAYOR (CON'T.) COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE The Government Immunity Fund The Mayor agrees with this should have a minimal amount recommendation. Large claims, maintained In the balance. If and when they occur, can be Large claims should be paid paid out over a period of time over a period of time. or through a structured settlement mechanism. The Government immunity Fund The Mayor agrees with this should never be allowed to recommendation. diminish to nothing. The City should continue to The City's disability plan has retrain disabled workers. a strong Incentive for rehabilitating disabled workers. The impact of the "Script The Mayor concurs with the Card" should be reviewed to Insurance Advisory Board ' s determine whether this benefit recommendation that the Is too costly. "Script Card" benefit be terminated July 1 , 1987 due to Its high cost. A sophisticated lobbying The priority list of Developing the City's effort at the Legislature is - legislation should be legislative package Is an imperative. Additional developed In July in order to ongoing process beginning revenue sources must be begin working with the almost as soon as the pursued through the community for support of Legislature adjourns. The Legislature. The lobbying specific issues. City lobbyists are available effort is critical in to SLACC at any time for analyzing revenue sources and updates on specific City liability Issues. Issues and the ongoing formulation of the City's package. -9- k OFFICE OF THE MAYOR (CON'T.) COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE Lobbyists should work toward The lobbyists will continue to getting additional gas tax work towards getting revenue and home rule additional gas tax. The state legislation. wide gas tax levied by the Legislature in January will provide an additional $600,000 revenue in the FY 1987-88 budget. The lobbyists and the City Attorney will continue to pursue with the Legislature and the Constitutional Revision Commission local home rule authority. There should be a continuous The City monitors and lobbying effort throughout the participates in the year with an attempt to Legislative Interim Committee involve community meetings. representatives in the interim committees. The lobbying effort should be The Mayor will continue to coordinated between the coordinate with the Council to Mayor's Office and the City develop the City ' s legislative Council . package. The City should work closely The City will continue to work with the legislators who with legislators representing represent the City. the same constituency. -10- OFFICE OF THE MAYOR (CON'T.) COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE The process of having citizens The review process should be The Mayor agrees with this review the budget is planned as an ongoing process recommendation and has beneficial to the community throughout the year in order directed staff to evaluate the and to city government. to make it as meaningful as process. By the time the FY possible. 1987-88 budget is adopted by the City Council in June, staff will develop proposals for SLACCts response regarding the process for next year. PARKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE The public needs more Public Utility bills should be This suggestion will be information regarding Parks used, if feasible, to explored to determine expense and Recreation programming. communicate information to the and feasibility. The Parks public. Department will investigate this possibility, especially with regard to the Newspaper for Trees program. Newspaper inserts which The Department will continue describe recreation programs to minimize the cost of these should be continued; private Inserts by offering sponsors should be sought to advertising and other • support these advertising incentives. costs. Recreation programs are These programs are valuable to excellent and should be the community. Corporate expanded as funding allows. sponsorship allows recreation Corporate sponsors should programs to be developed and continue to be recruited to enhanced at no cost to the support these programs. taxpayer. -11- PARKS DEPARTMENT (CON'T.) COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE Interns should be utilized In This suggestion wl (I<: be the customer service area of referred to the Urban Forestry the Urban Forestry program so Board. Two interns ;are additional full-time staff currently being usedto would not be necessary. develop a tree Inventory. Only two parks will have Additional mini-parks should The Department Is very mindful flowers this year. We need to not be developed beyond the of the budget issues, relative be able to maintain existing ability to maintain existing to maintenance. parks before developing parks. additional parks. There is concern about the The planning and development The Department is mindful of heavy use of CDBG funds for of parks should be based on this issue. The need for developing parks. need, not the eligibility for parks, as outlined in the 1977 CDBG funds. Master Plan, shall be the primary criterion for development; the eligibility for CDBG funds shall be a secondary consideration. PARKS DEPARTMENT - GOLF ENTERPRISE FUND COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE A golf course at the Airport The proposed Airport golf The Golf Advisory Board has would encourage development of course should be developed approved this proposal . The new business, stimulate growth before the Mountain Dell Airport course will be in the Northwest Quadrant, and Course. The Mountain Dell developed as soon as improve the gateway to the proposal has legal problems, financially possible. The City. but should be developed as Mountain Dell course will be soon as practical . considered for future expansion and development according to the Golf Strategic Plan . -12- ,'J :1: GOLF ENTERPRISE FUND (COOT.) ' COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE '; Golf courses should continue The City is taking eps to to be redesigned to reduce reduce liability Ti ' oIf liability. Liability should courses during the y=sign always be considered in the phase of new coursit `:and of initial design. improvements to ex, ing courses. A compatible tenant(s) The Department is f crently solution for the Forest Dale working with the U; Golf clubhouse should be identified Association to find as expeditiously as possible. compatible tenant"' ) for this . clubhouse. POLICE DEPARTMENT a COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE Last year the consolidation of If consolidation of city and The City supports :tthe the city and county police county police services continued studies of; city and services was presented as the requires a change in the county consoltdatto of police optimum option for long term county form of government, the services and will s port any •N'F financial savings and improved elected officials in Salt Lake reasonable proposes management. City should be supportive of • such a change. A new police facility should The proposed Policeyepartment not be purchased until consolidation prov) es for a consolidation of city and more efficient and' Bast county police services have effective departmen ,;and for been explored more thoroughly. the consolidation q " Police and Fire dispatch.. Consolidation cannot;Tbe accommodated in the �'existing faci l ities. . ' -13- ' FI' PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT f' COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE '4% Changing to a monthly billing The water and sewer billing : A monthly billing ;, le system would be too costly. should remain bimonthly. If a provides for the me oed cash refuse collection fee is flow to su rs pport th;' ater and assessed, it should be ' sewer programs. k included in the bimonthly ,t, billing. Steps should be taken to This suggestion wl", ' be change the utility bill to a referred to an City bill which would include interdepartmental "'• mittee other bi l l ings, such as for recommendation" special improvement districts. The Department should pursue This concept is cut ntly the' possibility of Joint meter under investigation ; Previous readings with other utilities. proposals, however,. ? ave not 1g q,i been cost—effectivi , There are City programs and The City bill should be used Multiple use of thl ity bill meetings about which the more frequently to communicate will also be explop=1. by the public needs more information, with the public by printing a interdepartmental .•' mlttee i .e., Newspaper for Trees and message/reminder on the bill mentioned. previous"'` Salt Lake City Tomorrow or including inserts. Program. ; Additional special The Department wil j,e getting arrangements for collection of drop boxes in the ;Er future. utility bills, such as drop ;, boxes, should be pursued. • There is some concern about Consideration should be given The Department wii,: the safety of employees to the possibility of creating investigate this s' g.estion. working alone in isolated a " life line" for employees 1, areas. working in remote areas. i ddd . —14— PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (CON'T.) COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE The City should be commended Every effort should be made to Every effort will ;.«o' 'fiinue to for working to protect the maintain a high standard of be made to protectt"e City's watershed. protection for this valuable watershed. resource. The new pumping station and sewage facility has had a positive impact on the surrounding neighborhood. <`' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The mechanized refuse The fee for this service The Mayor has prop ' -' d a collection program (MACi should not exceed $4/month/household : :e in the • should be implemented as $4/month/household. Recommended FY 19B. H8 Budget, quickly as possible. It will SLACC should be aw$ that � t r be a service to the citizens this fee does not Aolially of Salt Lake City and a long— , •cover the cost of 're, use term benefit to the City collection; the Gel=.'vial Fund budget. • will continue to pq r for the Neighborhood Clean '"Program, 10 The fee should be billed every , A monthly billing 4i c,.:le other month on the City bill . provides for the n ,ed cash flow to support r .`e collection. In ad, AJon, the Department bet ievej ';;,hat a monthly bill wouldwouldV easier for residents to 1 .;rporate into their personas( Iry.udgets. —15— i } {fi PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (CON'T.) l° COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE { �.i There should be an abatement The Mayor propose. . `. program for those not able to abatement program`.- 'the l+k afford this fee. Recommended FY 19:. F 8 budget of $2/month/house '• ,:= for those qualifying.: e • criteria used by 't.:i .�County's tax abatement pro• will be used for this aba,'' ':nt program. MAC should not be managed as The Mayor propose . et MAC be an enterprise fund. an enterprise fun .., ensure that garbage coll : ?.on is a self—sustaining p. am. Private developers and utility There should be a substantial The Mayor agrees this companies should be encouraged penalty on street cuts which recommendation. to coordinate with City are made after a road has been Department is cur ' '.ly • streets projects. reconstructed or resurfaced. revising the ordin es There should be a savings on governing the fee .d the current fee if a project penalties for stile `!';and road • is coordinated with City cuts in conjuncts ith the projects. Paver Management •aram. Conversion to sodium vapor The Department is:",. ' !rently street lights should be upgrading all str lighting continued because of the lower to sodium vapor w ,, ``= insuring cost of operation, no decrease in aca .J i l l umination. :>1: .1 I • —16— `r'` Hy tA ©«! PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (CON•T.) COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS RESPONSE An effort should be made to The Department wit /¥rsue recruit a private sponsor for this recommendati IThe the Leaf Bag Program. The Department agrees . safety sponsor could contribute ,s a significant D\ it of $35,000 and have the business' this program. name printed on the bags. The gw sponsor could help with distribution of the bags. The \ ƒ safety element of this program \ / should be emphasized since no \ % child has been injured while \ �{ playing in piles of leaves since this program was created. ) ' ' « x � \ . Jr, \ .a ' { 7 3. • ` \ \ & . `/ \ � . / 41, , , /\ ƒ i K ( / $ —17— \ \ ƒ ® \ \ SALT' ' ate$;GJ1T C RPOR1ION LEROY W. HOOTON. JR. --=- - '•� DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES JOSEPH S. FENTON WATER SUPPLY & WATERWORKS PALMER DEPAULIS SUPERINTENDENT, WATER RECLAMATION WATER RECLAMATION MAYOR WENDELL E. EVENSEN. P.E. 1530 SOUTH.WEST TEMPLE SUPERINTENDENT SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 WATER SUPPLY & WATERWORKS May 1, 1987 TO: Salt Lake City Council RE: 50 Year License Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and United States of America Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation for crossing of and connection to the Salt Lake Aqueduct, Provo River Project. Recommendation: That the Council approve the agreement and forward to the Mayor for execution in behalf of the City. Availability of Funds: Budget Discussion: Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities has a need to take water from the Deer Creek Aqueduct on Danish Road at approximately 3200 East to provide more water into the city's water distribution system. 1. Please return three (3) agreements with attached plans to this office to be forwarded to the Bureau of Reclamation for final execution. Submitted by: Sj 4LE W. 10 JR: Director Department of Public Utilities /)„ /srb Attachments 42-29 RESOLUTION NO. OF 1987 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, BUREAU OF RECLAMATION WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13, U. C.A. , 1953, as amended , allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services ; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes ; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah : 1. It does hereby approved the attached agreement generally described as follows : A license agreement to allow a crossing of and connec- tion to the Salt Lake Aqueduct, Provo River Project . 2 . Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor of Salt Lake City , Utah, is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1987. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER RLM :rc4 7 UC-585 Contract No. 7-07-41-L0330 (2/83) LBR UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Provo River PROJECT LICENSE AGREEMENT between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Salt Lake City Corporation THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT, made this 13th day of March 19 87 , in pursuance of the Act of Congress of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388) , and acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, particularly the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (53 Stat. 1187) , between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting by and through the Bureau of Reclamation, Department of the Interior, hereinafter referred to as the "United States," represented by the officer executing this agreement, hereinafter referred to as "Contracting Officer," and Salt Lake City Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Licensee. " WITNESSETH THAT: 2. WHEREAS, the Licensee, at its sole cost and expense, proposes to cross the Salt Lake Aqueduct Provo River Project, State of Utah , hereinafter called the Project Works and the granting of a license to utilize a portion of the Project Works in a manner and at the location hereinafter described will not be incompatible with Project purposes; 3. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants herein contained, the United States, to the extent of its interest in the Project Works, hereby grants to the Licensee, upon the terms hereinafter provided, a license for the following purposes and in the location described below: A. Purpose: To construct a 24 - inch connection to the Salt Lake Aqueduct B. Period: 50 years from date hereof. C. Location (In terms of Project Works Centerline Stationing): Salt Lake Aqueduct Station 1764 + 64 D. Location (Legal Description): NW1/2 Section 2, Township 3 South, Range 1 East, Salt Lake Meredian E. Plans, Drawings or Maps (Attached Hereto and made a Part Hereof): Exhibit "A" - Location map Exhibit "B" & "C" - Standard Plan F. Land Status I Fee Title or withdrawn Ix Easement or Reserved Right of Way 4. WORK SATISFACTORY. The Licensee shall perform all work under this License Agreement in accordance with the plans, drawings, or maps attached hereto and in a manner satisfactory to the United States and the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City , hereinafter called the District 5. RIGHTS RESERVED. This License Agreement and all rights hereunder shall be held by the Licensee at all times subject to the rights of the United States and District . Jurisdiction and supervision of the United States over the concerned lands are not surrendered or subordinated by issuance of this License Agreement. The United States reserves the right to issue additional licenses, rights-of-way, or permits for compatible uses of the lands involved in this License Agreement. There is also reserved the right of the United States, its officers, agents, employees, licensees, and permittees, and the right of the District , its officers, agents, employees, and assigns, at all proper times and places freely to have ingress to, passage over, and egress from all of said lands for the purpose of exercising, enforcing, and protecting the rights reserved herein. 6. HOLD HARMLESS. A. The United States and the District , their offi- cers, agents, employees, and assigns do not assume any liability resulting from the granting of this license or the exercise thereof and Licensee agrees to indemnify and hold the United States and the District their officers, agents, employees, and assigns harmless for injury or damage to any persons or property that may result from the exercise of any of the privileges herein conferred. B. The Licensee further agrees that the United States and the District , their officers, agents, employees , and assigns, shall not be held liable for any damage to Licensee's improvements or works by reason of the exercise of the rights herein reserved; nor shall anything con- tained in this paragraph be construed as in any manner limiting other reser- vations in favor of the United States and the District contained in this License Agreement. 7. RELEASE FROM LIABILITY. The Licensee hereby releases the United States and the District , their officers, employees, agents, or assigns, from liability for any and all loss or damage of every description or kind whatsoever, which may result to the Licensee from the construction, operation, and maintenance of Project Works upon said lands , provided that nothing in this License Agreement shall be construed as releasing the United States or the District , from liability for their own negligence. 8. EXTRAORDINARY MAINTENANCE OR REPAIR COSTS. The Licensee agrees that if the maintenance or repair of any or all project structures and facili- ties located on such lands should be made more expensive by reason of the existence of improvements or works of the Licensee thereon, Licensee will promptly pay to the United States and/or the District , their agents or assigns responsible for Project operation and maintenance, the full amount of such additional expense upon receipt of an itemized bill therefor. 9. LICENSEE TO DEFEND TITLE. The Licensee shall reimburse the United States and the District for all costs and expenses incurred in the defense of any action which challenges the Licensee' s use of Project right-of-way or facilities under this License Agreement. 10. INTERFERENCE PROHIBITED. The Licensee shall use, occupy, and maintain said facilities with due care to avoid damage to or obstruction of the irrigation and drainage facilities or other structures of the United States, or any interference in any way with the operation and maintenance of the same. 11. TERM OF LICENSE - TERMINATION. The United States, at its option, may terminate this License Agreement for nonuse of the licensed lands by the Licensee for a period of two (2) continuous years. In any event this license shall expire by limitation at the end of the period recited in Article 3B. All rights granted to the Licensee under this License Agreement are subject to termination upon failure of Licensee to comply with the terms of this License Agreement. 12. REMOVAL OF FACILITIES. The United States, its agents or assigns, will determine if the Licensee' s facilities will be removed upon termination. If the United States, its agents or assigns, determines that the facility shall be removed, removal will be made within thirty (30) days after termina- tion, and the site will be restored as nearly as practicable to its original condition. Removal of the facilities and restoration of the site will be at the sole expense of the Licensee. 13. ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER. This license shall not be assigned or transferred by the Licensee without the prior written consent of the United States and the District 14. SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST OBLIGATED. This License Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 15. NO WARRANTY. The United States makes no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the extent or validity of the grant contained herein. 16. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES. The Licensee warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this License Agreement upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established commercial agencies maintained by Licensee for the pur- pose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty, the United States shall have the right to annul this License Agreement without liability or in its discretion to require Licensee to pay, in addition to the License Agreement consideration, the full amount of such commission, percen- tage, brokerage, or contingent fee. 17. OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT. No Member of or Delegate to Congress or Resident Commissioner shall be admitted to any share or part of this License Agreement or to any benefit that may arise herefrom, but this restric- tion shall not be construed to extend to this License Agreement if made with a corporation or company for its general benefit. 18. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE. The Licensee agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations pertaining to pollu- tion control and environmental protection. 19. LANDSCAPE PRESERVATION AND NATURAL BEAUTY. A. The Licensee shall exercise care to preserve the natural landscape and shall conduct its construction operations so as to prevent any unnecessary destruction, scarring, or defacing of the natural surroundings in the vicinity of the work. Except where clearing is required for permanent works, all trees, native shrubbery, and vegetation shall be preserved and shall be protected from damage which may be caused by Licensee' s construction operations and equipment. Movement of crews and equipment within the rights- of-way and over routes provided for access to the work shall be performed in a manner to prevent damage to grazing land, crops, or property. B. Upon completion of the work, the construction site shall be smoothed and graded in a manner to conform to the natural topography of the landscape and shall be repaired, replanted, reseeded, or otherwise corrected as directed by the Contracting Officer at the Licensee' s expense. 20. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The Special Provisions, attached hereto, are hereby made a part of this License Agreement the same as if they had been expressly set forth herein. See Exhibit "D" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this License Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Projects Manager, Utah Projects Office Upper Colorado Region, Bureau of Reclamation LICENSEE Salt Lake City Corporation By Title APPROVED: ATTEST: Metropoliton Water District of BY Salt Lake City Title By Title ATTEST: By Exhibit "D" Special Provisions 1 . All backfiil material within United States rights-of-way shall oe com- pacted to 90 percent of maximum density unless otherwise shown. Mechanical compaction shall not be allowed within b inches of the projects work whenever possible. In no case will mechanical compaction using heavy equipment be allowed over the project works or within 18 inches horizontally of the proj- ects works. 2. That the backfilling of any excavation or around any structure within the United States rights-of-way shall be compacted in layers not exceeding 6 inches thick to the following requirements: ( 1) cohesive soils to 90 percent maximum density specified by ASTM part 19, D-698, method A; (2) noncohesive soils to 70 percent relative density specified by ANSI/ASTM Part 19, D-2049, Par. 7.1.2, wet method. 3. Licensee shall notify the United States and the District at least forty- eight hours in advance of commencing installation of waterline connection to permit inspection by the United States and/or the District. 4 . Salt Lake City will not be allowed to connect the service line to the Little Willow Pump Plant until such time it is determined that no surge analy- sis is required or until a surge analysis has been prepared by the city and approved by Reclamation. V i191HX3 4 ,,` til Q Q O J o I °s— a - , 1lftt1A NOI1tl1S dWfld ,bZ a Si', CC 6 C , LT z G 3AIVA A3d8311118 ••b? in d W� 0 •71 `‘ '''','*** r,6'a ,111111111,Id1I 0 1119111111111111 1111EM EM •. _._,0s,. 4. 0 ,A 7 . ,,,,e4.441> ,,,,, arar-ii „0/ 0 d ,' , •�4 XO8 8'13W ,9.,9 - 1 0 9.40 O M , d �d S m _'-)CC' S8Z1 2, 9 C; _ 126 Ob 35166 7 3 _ w A�' '13665113 d01 (03bOStl3W ,8CE69) d 0 /__ 1 k3 801 ) / 1S M 153M NOISIAIG9f15 Z Oh N SNV"7 N3G�00 �t HIflOS a i a�ii o' / n' NOl w 3 p0 DOOM (JD 1V ' ,3 1 O NI1 N1V L1C 11{1GN , �� \ j r- Fn - - - Q. z \j / u m 3 G 1 xO .61) M 154]-:J t_i_n. Li 9N11S�X; ' ..,a ; t Z d10 moon _ — _— —L _. _ --3 71 71 066 'rJ _-1.-- _._ _-._ -. -- --. _. _r_.!i• S _-- O m \ / n r, \ m 0 a Qz z z z z-.,s NS N z �� N C' -UZ J t i CJ �L i ,0 0105 rn is , 3 m /- d �6� - V� O O , , , 0 L co , \ A k _,..., 0 OZ "I' 0 0 \ \ \ 7// O� _,_ _ _ •;_ _„,_,,,,,...„,„„ ,,,„,;,,,,„ ,,....-,,,,,,,,,,,,F,7,747-,t,- -..,r:no:,'‘'.';-,4,n7,c, -0 r-';,: • . 4.::''''',':$ , _ _ , ..,,,_ ._, _, _ ,,,,_ ,7. _ z ,... .....,. ....,„,,,,,,,,,,-,,,,,.. ., ''''.1.,77,„„„,:"',, ',r: ,,'.,',- ,.,-t' .,:r" '----,..• ' ,"i i ,„ ::::,P, -:',': ,:`,,,,,,,:'','• ,'..: f',,, - ' ,. ,..; .',"'tv•"..:J4."4*.',..,. ::',.:"..;,-,ti„,,,,,-,,,it ,,?.:.#'4'7"'6174.,,P7'...; i',,,,i',.;:4-,4.4,:.''''''`,;1':::::iX*:171:7'.,'::P:...•t'''.'.' .: '.-r;.::". ' .;•-• . . '; '' -'! -.':;-: ',' , '•• , :. ''',4::;- ' ': -,s' , „ ,,, , . . '''' . ' rs ,, -,:.. ': ,li., ,,..::,„.„.‘,,,,,, ,.• J .,_:,;:,,,-;,,,,itm.,.,,::_i,,,,f,', ,i , . . 4417 ' :.;'• _.„,- k, , ,.. too, , A • - ' 1 _t •',1 I. ' '.,4 ••,.r..-,,,,,- •.%;, ---.--•','. -.:•-, ...`i.;-, , _„ . _ .. , .. . , -- iNnit*-,.,, is:,:.: `...4. , '. :` . ,..,.N.;. . , , ,i,..,•-,,.. -. ,•• .4„..---, Y1d ' -----,'„•,:` - . , • . ...2---:-. '.. :;,_1 ... - "•-•;=';',k- (INV IS tw, sifi, ,-.1. - ' ' .., , . . ( , .. ,' . - J Li _.,,,,•_,,,,. _____=_____-__,,,__' ,,,,, _ . ._,_._ ...; _.. _,_, ,. *..'",.,..........11-•"...- 22 . "'"'"'4' ''..ii,4t-:•:. 44-••..'.:..'.. -: •-.4.,q,'`,1 -; 4i.,•„1"...' ,•- k. ,,‘ .ks,:,„ .- '. -,:•:?,41 ..,.: ' .. C) . r 4 .- i.t•...,,,, •• ti'l.-,-,'" ...4 Cl) 0-J . !','','n.,'' 0 0 =0 0 co co: fn"•••• 0 .....4. _L 7 0 C.) . . r , cr 0 0 NIL. • ? ,,,,,,, LU _J ce4., 0 CO 0 ''-`• o i:s:p--/ 2 oc. \ 3 I-- o , ._ ,•:.• To c9. cn I- F— Ell 0 ____.4 0 CS co° F-- . . (-.) 0 . , 0 . . 01 W 0 i 0 <I .-..'''''''•• I k. , tq' • /.. Z 0 / cl _.1 • 7-I/2' ,., c, 2‘ ley • . •' _ 1ST REBAR r3-1/4i JACKHAMMER OPENING IN AQUEDUCT PIPE • ' NGECK $\%. ,, , ,.' . .. • LELANDICE CLNASS 150 I t0 39* RA0\ NOTE: CLEAN CONCRETE AND STEEL SURFACES ACCORDING TO MANUFAC- • TURE'S SPECIFICATIONS C A BONDING G APPLYING 4, N EXPOSED STEEL INSTALLATION :OAL TAR EPDXY. 24� 0 PkPE H 40 ---� �,7 // _- • ->''-""T�. ' CEMENT M(—TAR LINED. • : / COAT STEEL AND CONCRETE SURFACE WITH 400p/ �� CONCRETE EPDXY OR LATEX BONDING AGENT i o '24/ APD FILL WITH NON-SHRINK,NON-kVETALLIC CONCRETE GROUT.VIBRATE CONCRETE TO FILL IN Pr VODS. NOTE: • 84 D. AQUEDUCT SALT LAKE CITY TO SUPPLY THIMBLE. INSTALLATION BY CONTRACTOR. SECTION B I" 1 1.t-1/4.1 4 3/4.. 3/8" TYP. is • '. PARTIAL SECTION . l r -. s., _, ,.}. h I ... . ",.: ,..;rx.. .r ,Lsm.i... z . r .a. .:. .,1 ,4', ><uP,,.=.A: ..'+....iv. w,::... , .no-.$.#.;S% ?s s1' ` .'-.A''',.,, r_ --iirY '� `. -?v `r' �p� }}.A.zr*k,,,wJ .a i Sr r "m I Y Iri Sr .d o. �' a 1-, "lin'r 43r .,,,„ c; _ li'f fFPrii:74 lieu ,74,.`"C ., , ....,.....:e c.. -'a...v s �.-- -�-•�i f 1 w.r. SW 4 ,, ..rr>,w `. >."r s:rr e e c - r.,p:, w'vuu: ---,-.7 !{ �� L) T7 ! I F liQ I.r 1 .-,' 1 X V � e 7 JrT t . .ram 1 :...... NKa « :, I Ir•N,t Yt i q+y� qy���}.�{ �py9,yp pga��py� i h^fir(ti sF a � ADJUSTABLE 'i 91 9� f=6" STEEL st ED.BLACK �FOR 1518-EXPANSION.A(iCHOR OFOF COfuC` ... • } . , r SEE DETAIL"0." 2-U2" [«.. ^t-s rf/ra^> Iwillillirr "q �'7- 4 few Pl ATE . . 2'r•bat,.;"' '41 m .'^ i, �. "I'- SEE NO -.. - ...-.t tW, _ SAFETY"TES BAR , 'SAG"s 4 '4' 1 +1 r C "' �-,rwr vs 1-0/4"STD.BLACK 4N1` Z , ., v� ,k s:3s •.w rI'. , 'STEEL PIPE r' 4.: ' r .. • :A SECTION A-A 4 + 0003 x,. p..4 , ,. 4ii.6, . '" .. 1-7 S"FD.BL7T WELDING I w PPE CAP 1 • Est m ,.G'. r.' r1111A—. G r 4 6a a� C. .. `h I4/4" .ACK i i ' P��`�! . Mr - • .S i t pNl . If3 a I• •.♦ $$AfE7Y 57EPbAR� "r^" - !��® - &OR LADDER)OR.. I ' 14"INA.BAR - DETAIL'A FAR 6141P eAN) r� CONCRETE FLOOR ...'- s —3 LADDER h 0 x i¢33"CALVANI E AFTER FABRICATION _ s•NOTES.FOR LAD ,r ,, r� . g GALVANI ALL FERROUS METALS. �. �':'° SHOP WELD ALL LADDERS AND 1Lt: - x. GRAB SMOOTH. GRIN:WELDS '-; l'. 1E RAG"DIA.HOLES FOR �5/S"pA.aTTANSKIN ..USE SAFETY BAR NO.627 -pa.... OM' ASH AS MANUFACTURED BY BUSTIN •• = + y` R VENTHOLEMDUSTRIAL PRODUCT.INC. "TREAD-GRIP"NO.II-GAUGE '_w- ,. SHEET STEEL LADDER RUNGS AS µ '•MANUFACTURED BY MORTON 7 -r MANUFACTURING CO.OR j 4 APPROVED EQUAL. i 0 ' I-I14"STD ILACK ` STEEL Q t.' pp i ��; �'I 3/4"R i OPTIONAL SUPPORT AT FLOOR... .\. '. '_ a w N CK } 2tp :.. a 1•_ s ` z' t • p 6:0.. 1 .KT, 1 s%_ r"rLL1CaNCIlE7E SOX— 1� r LAO�p Or • MANHOLE OPENING • OPENING FOR _ SHALL BE ON SAME .DECK LID •�,:. •. SIDE OF PIPE AS r�24 .-_ G. ' . 24"HAND WHEEL "` •I . OPERATOR 1 . • ''gyp 'c FLc,'.- r7 AME T .�' PrE A6:24"NAIND WtNEEL OPERATOR. ---- - - -- - -- —- . Mpg or PLAN VIEW oPEN1N6 SMALL SE ON isAMg r r.rotau - fib; Rased pattern • Dog, pl.rG //// ►, • TOP OF GROUND 4984; "'"'"'""".I �`'1, . :. q re :: H IQ'EM1,6F C' _. ' r ...""eaa.s r'+gun.w r3g ay. 1k.-.. :.- - Mims-.(rft4.,- i' ,. 7 • rY i t A5l6"EW EF �. 1 • AS 6 12"EW,EP "it or cM!£F ", •' . . • . rxaGr rw ,t1 _ ` W ° r I :fi�r.s� 4 I / I 11,K.r.re, rLi ai ar .� i 4., VAAL i r f , F-% \ VALVE HOOK 1ON• f� ! j7Vif �L OPERA WOE ASTORS-4-'1 ' r ,4100lt f{ I ( f ' i 1F`iilis;.:' INSTALL 3"TO ED COLLAIF WI,r PLUG t. 1- I _ INSTALL r FLANGE a SCREW END STEEL • r�Nr I I' , - m' INSTALL 4"a D"FLANNE'REGlNC6R. ` _-� 1� ., - INSTALL 4"FLUKE GATE VALVE W i� `-6 „I�sr 1 ~warsr—""Wan `- I°�, �_t._i N73 1, - .Y/1l, TpALL 4'OP NUT arrows ERATING ANGE-OUTLET .tksi, . u 84"STEEL PPE VALVE BOX DE I`A1L +!w ' '4>i .. -11 _ y ? -•,= s. . � i ....-. CONCRETE PEDESTAL • • 4" DRAIN ASSEMBLY BOARD Eddie P. Mayne, Chairman ;�;; >" PALMER A. DEPAULIS, Mayor J. Alan Blodgett • William H. Kibbie • Don A. Mackey � LOUTS E. MILLER Mirvin D. Borthick • Joseph Rosenblatt ,P 0 Director of Airports Aline W. Skaggs • Elaine B. Weis • Thomas K. Welch O �` RrAk) April 30, 1987 The Honorable Mayor Palmer A. DePaulis Mayor's Office - Salt Lake City Hall 324 South State Street, Fifth Floor Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Mayor DePaulis: On February 1, 1978, the City entered into an agreement with the United States Government to lease approximately 7,074 square feet of space in the Executive Terminal for National Weather Service operations. Because of the need for more office space to house augmented computer equipment, the government, through its General Services Administration, requested an additional 700 square feet of space. That space is currently available within the Executive Terminal. Terms and conditions associated with this Supplemental are as follows: Leased Premises: The original 7,074 square feet of office shall be increase to 7,774 square feet. Rental: Rental for the additional footage shall be consistent with the existing annual rate for a total annual payment of $81,697.65, payable monthly in arrears. All other terms and conditions of the existing agreement remain unchanged. May I therefore respectfully request that you sign the enclosed (2) copies and request the City Recorder to return both copies to my office so that we may proceed with obtain government signature. Respe ully, is E. Miller Salt Lake City Airport Authority • AMF Box 22084, Salt Lake City, Utah 84122 • (801) 539-2400 RESOLUTION NO. OF 1987 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ) WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13, U. C.A. , 1953, as amended , allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accanplish said purposes; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah : 1. It does hereby approved the attached agreement generally de scribed as follows : A modification of an existing lease to add 700 square feet of expansion space to Lease No. GS-08B-10866. 2 . Palmer A. DePaul i s, Mayor of Salt Lake City , Utah, is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1987. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER oR0E0 AS T'J f'�RMOtt«n psttornaY Salo I ake�Gity rr� RLM :rc4 7 Date BY. CONTRACT ROUTING FORM M/ I b 1:e...; REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: Airport DATE: April 29, 1987 DEPARTMENTAL CONTACT: John Wheat SUBJECT:u.s. Government/National Weather Service Supplemental #8 X-Ie'i)11; SIGNATURE: YES I NO Number of Executed Documents Required: 2 Insurance Required Expected Contract Completion Date: January 31, 1988 Insurance Attached (plus 1 10 year option) - _ V"PROVED DE>`-.F.7"te:NT FINANCE COMMENTS: Account Number: 54-03500-1722:7 Th, ATTORNEY COMMENTS: n r - ttc,‘ (tit' CITY • ............. . _ ...... RECORDER COMMENTS: returned to on (contact or dept. ) (date) • GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT D.' .� 117' ' PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE NO. 8 ( i d SUPPLEMENTAL LEASE AGREEMENT TO LEASE NO. GS- 08B-1 0866 ADDRESS OF PREMISES Executive Terminal Building 2370 West 337 North, Salt Lake City International Airport Salt Lake City, Utah 84122 THI'S AGREEMENT, made and entered into this date by and between SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION whose address is A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF UTAH AMF Box 22084 Salt Lake City, Utah 84122 hereinafter called the Lessor, and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, hereinafter culled the Government: WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the above Lease., to add approximately 700 square feet of expansion space, subject to actual measurement. NOW THEREFORE, these parties for the considerations hereinafter mentioned covenant and agree that the said Lease is amended, effective May 1 , 1987 , as follows: Paragraphs 1 , 3 and 5 are hereby deleted and replaced with the following : "1 . The Lessor hereby leases to the Government the following described premises : Approximately 7,774 net usable square feet of space located on the ground floor of the Executive Terminal , 2370 West 337 North, Salt Lake International Airport, Salt Lake City, Utah, to be used for operational and administrative functions by the National Weather Service. " "3. The Government shall pay the Lessor annual rent of $81 ,697.65 at the rate of $6,808.14 per month in arrears. Rent for a lesser period shall be prorated. Rent checks shall be made payable to : Salt Lake City Treasurer, Salt Lake City International Airport, AMF Box 22084, Salt Lake City, Utah 84122. " "5. The lease may be renewed at the option of the Government, for the following terms and at the following rentals : One (1 ) ten-year period at $10. 50 per square foot, subject to escalation , provided notice be given in writing to the Lessor at least 180 days before the end of the original lease term or any renewal term; all other terms and conditions of this lease shall remain the same during any renewal .term. Said notice shall be computed commencing with the day after the date of mailing. " (Please see attached page) All other terms and conditions of the lease shall remain in force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties subscribed their names as of the above date. LESSOR SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ev (Si gna et re) (Tide) IN PRESENCE OF (Signature) (Address) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE , REAL ESTATE DIVISION, LEASING BRANCH 9f (Signature) (Official Tide) GSA DC 68-1176 . GSA �J APP9MVEI AS TO FOR!" Salt Late __City /Attorney s• 9II SUPPLEMENTAL LEASE AGREEMENT NO. 8 TO LEASE NO. GS-08B-10866 PAGE NUMBER 2 The following is added to Paragraph 7 of the Lease : f. Exhibit B, showing the additional approximate 700 net usable square feet, which includes the release of one room (marked delete on floor plan ). j s? .a • DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CRAIG E. PETERSON 324 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 201 DIRECTOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111' _ 53577777 To: Salt Lake City Council May 4, 1987 Re: Petition No. 400-495 submitted by the Garden Centre Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on July 7 , 1987 at 6:20 P.M. to discuss Petition 400-495 submitted by the Garden Centre. The petitioners are requesting Salt Lake City to rezone property located at 2091 east 1300 South Street from an "R-2" to a "B-3" classification on the northwest corner of 13th South and 21st East Streets in order to allow The Garden Centre to utilize an area approximately 30' x 50' for the seasonal display and sales of garden materials. Funding: Not applicable. Background and Discussion: The Planning Commission considered this matter on March 12th. At that time the petition received opposition from the immediate neighbors. Opposition was also expressed .by the Bonneville Hills Neighborhood Council. Support was expressed by the Foothill Neighborhood Council and several neighbors. After much discussion, the Planning Commission recommended the extension of the "B-3" zone covering the three parking stalls only. This will be an area of approximately 20' x 30' back of the setback line. Legislative Document: The City Attorney's Office has prepared the necessary ordinance which is attached for your action. Submitted by: CRAIG E. PETERSON Director jd/ SALT UAW OMej IONr DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PALMER DEPAULIS City Engineering Division MAX G. PETERSON, P E. MA,OR 444 SOUTH STATE STREET CITY ENGINEER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 535-7871 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 20, 1987 REFERENCE: Resolution to Crea to the 1987/88 Concre to Replacement Specia 1 Improvement District 40-R-13. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the resolution to create the District as described in the "Notice of Intention". AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: Fiscal year 1987/88 General Fund and property owner assessments through the Special Improvement District DISCUSSION: The 1987/88 Concrete Replacement Special Improvement District involves the repair of de teriora ted concre te. The areas involved in the district are Ma in S tree t from 900 South to 2100 South along with the connec ting s tree is be tween Main and S to to S tree t and in the Avenues from "A" Street to "E" Street between 4th and 7th Avenue. The project will involve replacing deteriorated curb and gutter, sidewalks, driveway approaches and the installation of wheelchair ramps and drainage facilities. Construction of the project is scheduled for summer 1987 and 1988. The majority of the work will be done during 1987 with completion by early summer 1988. The construction will be phased and administered as to cause a minimum amount of disruption and inconvenience to the property owners and pedestrians. Attached is an information sheet and summary of protests for the district. CONTACT PERSON: John Naser - 535-6240 SUBMITTED BY: Joseph R. Anderson, Public Works Director1W4 JN:am Attachments cc: John Naser Va u 1 t S Gitt lin DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PALMER DEPAULIS City Engineering Division MAX G. PETERSON. P E. LI�voR 444 SOUTH STATE STREET CITY ENGINECR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 535-7871 INFORMATION SHEET 1987/ 83 CONCRETE REPLACEMENT SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 40-R- 13 DISCUSSION : The 1987/ 88 Concrete Replacement Special Improvement District involves the replacement and repair of deteriorated sidewalks and curb and gutter within two areas of the City . The first area being Main Street from 900 South to 2100 South and the streets between Main and State Streets . The second area involves the Avenues from "A" Street to " E" Street between 4th and 7th Avenues . The project will replace deteriorated concrete sidewalks , curb and gutters and driveway approaches ; the installation of storm drain facilities , sod and topsoil and wheelchair ramps at all corners ; and the removal of illegal driveways and cutback parking . AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS : Funds for the project will come from the 1987/88 General Fund and property owner assessments through the Special Improvement District . PRELIMINARY ESTIMATED COSTS: 1 . The area of Main Street Total Estimated Cost $ 950 ,000 Property Owner Portion 800 ,000 City' s Portion 150 ,000 ( Approximately 15% Single Family Residential Property) Page 2 2 . Avenues Area Total Estimated Cost S 370 ,000 Property Owner Portion 200 ,000 City ' s Portion 170 ,000 ( Approximately 70% Single Family Residential Property ) Total Project Cost $1 , 320 ,000 Total Property Owner ' s Portion 1 ,000 , 000 Total City Portion 320 ,000 SUMMARY OF TABULATION OF PROTESTS : LIST OF PROTESTING PROPERTIES Property Owner Property Address Est . Assessment 1 . Ms . Beckie A. Bradshaw 253 5th Ave . Rate 1 - 4" thick sidewalk 36 .0 SF x $ 5 . 15 = $ 185 .40 Rate 3 - 6" thick open driveway 145 .0 SF x $ 7 . 10 = $1 ,029 . 50 Rate 6 - high back curb 100 .0 LF x $20 . 50 = $2 ,050 .00 $ 3 , 264 .90 2. Ms . Leota Pedockie 33 Coatsville Avenue Rate 1 - 4" thick sidewalk 20 .0 SF x $ 5 . 15 = $ 123.00 Rate 2 - 6" thick sidewalk 32 .0 SF x $ 6 . 60 = $ 211 . 20 $ 334. 20 3 . Mrs . D. Cook 329 "C" Street Rate 2 - 6" thick sidewalk 40 .0 SF x $ 6 .60 = $ 264.00 Rate 3 - 6" open driveway approach 163 .0 SF x $ 7 . 10 = $1 , 157 . 30 Rate 6 - high back curb & gutter 20.0 LF x $20.50 = $ 410.00 $ 1 ,831 . 30 Page 3 List of Protesting Properties ( continued ) 4. Mr . Ronald Jones 265 5th Avenue Rate 1 - 4" thick sidewalk 12 .0 SF x $ 5 . 15 = $ 61 .80 Rate 2 - 6" thick sidewalk 48 .0 SF x $ 6.60 = $ 316 .80 $ 378 . 60 5 . Mrs . Ethelyn Parks 273 6th Avenue Rate 1 - 4" thick sidewalk 128 .0 SF x $ 5 . 15 = $ 659 . 20 Rate 3 - 6" thick sidewalk 40 .0 SF x $ 6 .60 = $ 264 .00 $ 923 . 20 6. Triple L Marketing 1433 South Main Rate 12- 8" thick sidewalk 132 .0 SF x $ 8. 40 = $1 , 108.80 $ 1 , 1nP .8n 7 . Andreas Venizelos 175 4th Avenue 181 4th Avenue 183 4th Avenue 209 "A" Street 225 "A" Street ( Combined Assessment 5 Parcel ) Rate 1 - 4" thick sidewalk 536 .0 SF x $ 5 . 15 = $2 ,760 . 40 Rate 3 - 6" thick sidewalk 96 .0 SF x $ 7 . 10 = $ 681 .60 Rate 6 - high back curb & gutter 173 . 5 LF x $20.50 = $3 ,556 .75 Rate 10- 6 ' thick flare driveway 60.0 SF x $ 6. 75 = $ 405 .00 $ 7 ,403. 75 Page 4 List of Protesting Properties ( continued ) 8. Mr . Norman Robinson Main St . @ Herbert Ave . & Major St . @ Herbert Ave . Main Street Rate 1 - 4" thick sidewalk 390 . 0 SF x $ 5 . 15 = $2 ,008 . 50 Rate 12- 8" thick sidewalk 95 . 0 SF x $ 8 . 40 = $ 798 .00 Herbert Avenue Rate 1 - 4" thick sidewalk 455 . 0 SF x $ 5 . 15 = $2 , 343 . 25 Rate 12- 8" thick sidewalk 170 .0 SF x $ 8 .40 = $1 ,428 .00 Major Street Rate 1 - 4" thick sidewalk 484 . 0 SF x $ 5 . 15 = $2 ,492 .60 Rate 12- 8" thick sidewalk 84 . 0 SF x $ 8 .40 = $ 705 .60 $ 9 , 775 . 95 9 . Alliaince House 1724 South Main St . Rate 6 - high back curb & gutter 65 .0 LF x $20 . 50 = $1 , 332 . 50 Rate 4 - 8" thick open driveway 668 .0 SF x $ 8.90 = $5 ,945. 20 $ 7 , 277 . 70 10 . Triumph West Inc . 1160 South Main St . Rate 1 - 4" thick sidewalk 764 .0 SF x $ 5 . 15 = $3 ,934 .60 $ 3 ,934 .60 The following properties protested the Special Improvement District , but do not have deteriorated concrete according to the Ordinance. No assessment would be made to these properties . Property Owner Property Address 1 . Sieverts Enterprises 16 East Kensington Ave. 2. David W. Blanchard 27 East Bryan Avenue & 31 East Bryan Avenue Page 5 Estimated Total Assessment for Protesting Properties as per the " Notice of Intention" $ 36 , 233 . 00 SUMMARY OF DISTRICT PROTESTS Total Estimated Property Owner Assessment with the Special Improvement District $1 ,000 ,000 .00 Total Protesting Property Owner Assessment $ 36 , 233 . 00 Percentage Against the District 4% RECOMMENDATIONS : That the City Council create the Special Improvement District as detailed in the "Notice of Intention" j f��;�'�T�Y�LOIZR4°4j0 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PALMER OEPAULIS City Engineering Division MAX G. PETERSON, P.E. MAYOR 444 SOUTH STATE STREET CITY ENGINEER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 535-7871 TO : SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL REFERENCE : Resolution to create Special Improvement District 38-813 RECOMMENDATION : That the City Council adopt the resolution to create the District. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS : Fiscal year 1987/88 General Fund and Property Owner Assessment. DISCUSSION: This district will provide new street improvements where none previously existed . Four assessment rates have been established to identify property owner costs . A public meeting on April 3 , 1987 and a public hearing before City Council on April 14 , 1987 have been held . The streets to be improved are non-contiguous and are shown in the attached site plan . Construction of the project is scheduled for summer 1987 and 1988 . The majority of the work will be done in 1987 . Construction will be phased to cause the least amount of inconvenience to the neighborhood . Attached is an information sheet and a summary of protests for the District. CONTACT PERSON : - MARK MORRISON - 535-6031 SUBMITTED BY : JOSEPH R . ANDERSON , PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ,4 vor SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT INFORMATION SHEET CURB & GUTTER EXTENSION / PROJECT NO . 38-813 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION New street improvements are contemplated for various non- contiguous streets in the City . Improvements include the construction of sidewalk , curb , gutter , roadway pavings , and drainage facilities . Street locations and project financing are shown below . Property owners are to be assessed for sidewalk , curb , gutter , roadway , paving and miscellaneous work which is necessary to complete these improvements . Driveway approaches , park strip topsoil , and sod will be provided only upon propery owner request . Sprinkler systems will not be provided . The protest rate for the original district was less than 38 percent. Five of the streets having a protest rate of 50 percent or greater were identified . They are California Avenue , Paramount Avenue , Van Buren Avenue , Berkley Street , and 4th Avenue . It is recommended California Avenue , Paramount Avenue and Van Buren Avenue be removed from the District . The protest rate for 4th Avenue is 76% . City Council has the option to either include 4th Avenue in the District or remove it from the District because the overall District protest rate is less than 50% . The City's interest in 4th Avenue is the safe passage of pedestrian traffic from Canyon Road to the 4th Avenue stairs . The stairs at the west end of 4th Avenue are being reconstructed to encourage pedestian usage of the stairs . Berkley Street has only two property owners with 1 in favor of the District and 1 against and it is recommended Berkley Street be included in the District. The district will cover property abutting the following streets in Salt Lake City . 1 . Lucy Avenue , 200 West to 300 West. 2 . Paxton Avenue , 200 West to 300 West . 3 . High Avenue , 200 West to 300 West . 4 . Berkley Street - North of Westminster Ave . , Lots 80 & 81 , Bonneville Garden Subdivision 5 . Logan Avenue , 1700 East Intersection - Block 1 , Lots 1 & 2 ; Block 2 , Lots 1 , 2 , & 3 , Beverly Heights Subdivision . 6 . Logan Avenue , 1900 East Intersection - Block 1 , Lots 16 , 17 , & 18 , Bevery Heights Subdivision . 7 . Gray Avenue , 40 East to Wall Street . The following street in Salt Lake City will be included in the District at City Councils option . 1 . 4th Avenue , west of Canyon Road to East Capital Blvd . REVISED ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST Front Feet Rate of Abutting Estimated Estimated No . Improvements Property Cost/Foot Cost/Abutters 1 . Curb & gutter , 5' sidewalk & 10' of Residential class pavement 100' $44 . 50 $ 4 , 450 . 00 2 . Curb & gutter , 4" sidewalk & 10" Residential class pavement 1 , 956' 42 . 00 82 , 152 . 00 3 . Curb & gutter & 10' of residential class pavement 3 , 768' 32 . 00 120 , 576 . 00 4 . 10' of residential Class pavement 1 , 480 19 . 50 28 , 860 . 00 TOTAL $ 236 , 038 . 00 Total estimated Abutters Portion Exclusive of extra cost for private driveway approaches , sod & topsoil $ 237 , 000 . 00* Total estimated cost for Private Driveway Approaches $ 39 , 000 . 00 Total estimated cost for property owner Optional sod and topsoil $ 3 , 100 . 00 Total Estimated Cost of City's Portion $280 , 000 . 00 Estimated Cost of Project $559 , 100 . 00 * The adjustment for the City's portion has been taken into account in the rates so the estimated cost per unit represents the net estimated cost to be assessed to the property owner . The City's portion will not be assessed the property owner as an addition to this amount . FUNDING SOURCE Funds for the project will come from the 1987/ 88 General Fund and property owner assessment through the District . The following summarizes the estimated amounts of source funds . 1 . Abutting Property Owners portion Funding for Improvements A. Estimated cost of improvements including engineering and administration of District $ 279 , 100 . 00 B. Estimated cost of interim financing of the Abutters portion $ 30 , 000 . 00 2 . Estimated City portion Funding of Improvements $ 250 , 000 . 00 3 . Total funds required $ 559 , 100 . 00 TABULATION OF PROTESTS TOTAL PROTEST AMOUNT $ 115 , 013 . 26* TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONTAGE AMOUNT $ 303 , 770 . 75 DISTRICT PROTEST RATE = 115 , 013 . 26 divided by 303 , 770 . 25 x 100 37 . 9% * Total protest amount includes all written objections received up to the end of the public hearing on April 14 , 1987 . The following summarizes the results of the protests against each street received by the City Recorder . 1 . 4th Avenue Individual Parcel Protest Margaret H. Best 125- 127 E . 4th Avenue $ 1 , 104 . 64 Robert S & Ruth Hewlett 114 E. 4th Avenue $ 3 , 337 . 50 Alma Ritchie 121 E. 4th Avenue $ 3 , 408 . 64 Cynthia Shellinglaw/James J . Lehmann 123 E. 4th Avenue $ 492 . 48 Van A . Wright 197 Canyon Road $ 1 , 780 . 00 TOTAL PROTEST $ 10 , 123 . 26 TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONTAGE AMOUNT $ 13 , 387 . 50 PROTEST RATE = 10 , 123 . 26 divided by 13 , 387 . 50 x 100 75 . 6% 2 . Paramount Avenue Harold L . Canada 207- 208 West Paramount Avenue $ 9 , 704 . 90 Ruth & Duane Tuke 238 West Paramount Avenue $ 4 , 450 . 00 Harry Bath 261 West Paramount Avenue $ 2 , 400 . 00 Dee & Donna Fonnesbeck 226 West Paramount Avenue $ 4 , 307 . 60 Gloyd Green 245 West Paramount Ave . $ 8 , 064 . 00 280 West Paramount Ave . 3 , 337 . 50 TOTAL PROTEST $ 32 , 264 . 00 TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONTAGE AMOUNT $49 , 801 . 50 PROTEST RATE= 32 , 264 . 00 divided by 49 , 801 . 50 x 100 64 . 7% 3 . Lucy Avenue TOTAL PROTEST - 0- TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONTAGE $41 , 664 . 00 PROTEST RATE -0- 4 . Paxton Avenue TOTAL PROTEST - 0- TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONTAGE $49 , 725 . 00 PROTEST RATE - 0- 5 . California Avenue Jay Liljenquist North side California Avenue $ 27 , 667 . 50 Robert B . Allen , Jr . Secretary Steel Warehouse & Supply Corp . South side California Avenue $ 11 , 599 . 50 TOTAL PROTEST $ 39 , 267 . 00 TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONTAGE $49 , 212 . 00 PROTEST RATE = 39 , 267 divided by 49 , 212 . 00 x 100 = 79 . 8% 6 . High Avenue TOTAL PROTEST $ -0- TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONTAGE $24 , 000 . 00 PROTEST RATE -0- 7 . Van Buren Avenue Elsie G. Blechert 1546 South 300 West $ 7 , 360 . 00 Larry K . Nordstrom South side of Van Buren Ave . $21 , 408 . 00 TOTAL PROTEST $ 28 , 768 . 00 TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONTAGE $42 , 816 . 00 PROTEST RATE = 28 , 768 divided by 42 , 816 x 100 = 67 . 2% 8 . Berkley Street Robert R. Stevenson 2197 Westminster Avenue $ 1 , 487 . 50 TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONTAGE AMOUNT $ 2 , 975 . 00 PROTEST RATE = 1 , 487 . 50 divided by 2 , 975 . x 100 = 50% 9 . Logan Avenue Suzanne Elizabeth Hackett 1708 E . Logan Avenue $ 3 , 082 . 24 TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONTAGE AMOUNT $ 24 , 803 . 00 PROTEST RATE = 3 , 082 . 24 divided by 22 , 979 . x 100 = 12 . 4% 10 . Gray Avenue TOTAL PROTEST -0- TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONTAGE AMOUNT $ 5 , 386 . 75 PROTEST RATE - 0%