The URL can be used to link to this page

05/15/1990 - Minutes PROCED INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of the Whole on Tuesday, May 15, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. in Room 325, City Council Office, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Nancy Pace Tom Godfrey Don Hale Councilmember Horrocks was absent. Council Chair Hardman presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to Councilmember Hardman asked if order at 5: 10 P.M. the Council had any further ques- tions. The Council had no further Councilmember Hardman said he questions and Councilmember Hard- would like to conduct the inter- man wished Ms. Minson good luck. views to the City boards prior to the briefing from the Executive URBAN FORESTRY BOARD NOMINEE Director and asked if the Council INTERVIEW agreed to this. The Council agreed to alter the order of the Councilmember Hardman invited agenda and Councilmember Hardman Kenneth Louder to the table and invited Colleen Minson to the asked him to brief the Council on table. his background. LIBRARY BOARD NOMINEE INTERVIEW Mr. Louder indicated he had been a resident of Salt Lake City Councilmember Hardman since 1967. He said prior to this thanked Ms. Minson for showing time he had lived in Southern interest in being appointed to Idaho. He said he was the Presi- this board and asked if she could dent of FFKR, an architectural brief the Council on her back- firm. He indicated he had applied ground. Ms. Minson said she had a for this position because his strong personal and emotional neighbor who was resigning from commitment to the library system. the board had indicated that he She said she was raised in a small thought Mr. Louder was qualified town and the library was important to serve on this board and that he to the town and this had created would be interested in serving. her interest. Mr. Louder said he currently served on the United Way Alloca- Councilmember Hardman asked tion Committee. the Council if they had any ques- tions. Councilmember Kirk asked Councilmember Hardman asked Ms. Minson if she was aware of the the Council if they had any ques- commitment involved if she was tions. Councilmember Godfrey said appointed to the library board. Mr. Louder lived in his district Ms. Minson said she followed and lived on the street where the through on projects and she was most avid tree lovers live. Mr. aware of the commitment involved Louder said the neighborhood had and had spoken with her family an avid history of participation about this. She indicated this in environmental issues. would not be a problem. 90-167 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 Councilmember Hardman asked if consideration of the ordinance. there were any further questions. Councilmember Hardman asked if the There were not so Councilmember Council agreed to this. The Hardman thanked Mr. Louder for Council agreed to move item A-5 to coming and wished him good luck. C-3. Councilmember Hardman asked Ms. Gust-Jenson said Item F-1 Ms. Gust-Jenson to brief the would include using CDBG funds for Council. Canterbury Park and $175, 000 was the amount needed to complete the EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BRIEFING park. Councilmember Godfrey asked if this was the actual total. Ms. Gust-Jenson said there was Councilmember Whitehead said the some new paperwork for the Council total was actually $225, 000. Ms. meeting tonight. She said the Gust-Jenson said Councilmember first two items involved the Hardman would need to take over budget hearing. She said the the meeting during the motion Council would only be taking because Councilmember Hale could comments tonight on the proposed not conduct and make a motion at garbage fee increase and payment the same time. in lieu of taxes rather than acting on these ordinances. Councilmember Pace indicated she had talked to Pete Suazo of She said the third item was the Mayor' s office regarding the further information on agenda Item figures to renovate Fellowship F-3. Hall. Councilmember Godfrey asked if Mr. Suazo could brief the Ms. Gust-Jenson said she Council on how the figures were wanted to remind the Council of calculated. Ms. Gust-Jenson said the Executive Session to discuss Mr. Suazo would be providing labor negotiations following the documentation to explain the costs Council meeting. and she would let him know he should be prepared to address any Councilmember Pace asked if questions or concerns the Council the boundaries would be changed may have. for the SID Lighting District as the gentlemen who had protested Councilmember Godfrey asked the SID Lighting District had what the process for approving the requested. Ms. Gust-Jenson said funding would be. Ms. Gust-Jenson the recommendation from the Engi- said she would find the informa- neer' s office was to not change tion in her file and let the the boundaries because it would Council know. create a precedence for boundary changes in the future whenever a Ms. Gust-Jenson said item G-1 SID District was created. would address the public hearings on all of the budgets and the Councilmember Hardman said Mayor would provide an overview of Councilmember Hale would be con- his budget. She indicated the ducting the meeting tonight. He public has had misunderstandings recommended that item A-5 be moved on the Mayor' s proposed budget. and combined with Item C-3 because they concerned the same issue and Pete Suazo provided the Coun- it would be better for the Council cil with copies of the information to hear the comments prior to the on the Fellowship Hall project. 90-168 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 the State. He said this would Councilmember Hardman indicat- create a revenue shortfall of ed the Council should stay on $600,000 in the current year and schedule as much as possible this had come at a late time of because of public criticism re- the budget year. ceived last year due to running behind schedule. Ms. Gust-Jenson Mayor DePaulis said the City said there would also be many CDBG would need to move quickly to people in the audience to see how cover any potential losses. He the Council voted. said the Administration had dis- cussed the options on when to Councilmember Godfrey said record the shortfall in the books there had already been two CDBG and they had agreed it would be public hearings and most of the better to absorb the costs in the people already had a chance to current budget year. He said he speak. Councilmember Hardman would present a plan to the Coun- indicated the Council would need cil on solutions and that this was to be sensitive to the public' s not definitive. concerns. Mayor DePaulis indicated Ms. Gust-Jenson said Item G-2 additional revenue had been re- was a Legislative Action proposed ceived in business license fees by Councilmember Horrocks and he which could be used towards the was very supportive of the action shortfall. He said money would but could not attend due to his need to be taken from the General surgery. She indicated he had Fund, the contingency fund would asked for the Council ' s support on be placed on hold, and the refund this action. from Utah Power & Light would be used to cover the shortfall. Ms. Ms. Gust-Jenson said Item G-3 Hamilton said the City had re- had the Committee's support. ceived an estimate on the refund amount but the actual figure would Councilmember Hardman asked if not be known for about a week. the Council had any other com- ments. Ms. Gust-Jenson said the Councilmember Godfrey asked Councilmembers would be able to where the additional revenue would park in their regular parking come from. Councilmember White- spaces on Thursday night. head asked if this would effect salaries and jobs. Mayor DePaulis Councilmember Hardman invited said the departments would be Mayor Palmer DePaulis to the required to make cuts and it would table. be their decision on where to make the cuts. He indicated some REVENUE BRIEFING BY MAYOR departments would be able to eliminate nonessential expendi- Councilmember Hardman asked tures to cover the decrease in Mayor DePaulis to brief the Coun- their budgets. cil on the revenue situation. Mayor DePaulis said there had been Councilmember Whitehead said a revenue shortfall since he had he was concerned because this provided the Council with his would affect the following budget estimate because of a Utah Power & year, and asked if fund balance Light settlement which would give money could be used to make up the rebates to customers throughout short fall. Councilmember Godfrey 90-169 410 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 said this money could only be used in emergency situations. Ms. Gust-Jenson said a shortfall did not constitute an emergency clas- sification according to the law. Mayor DePaulis said $623, 000 was needed to cover the shortfall and he would like it to be done in the current year. Mayor DePaulis said he was going through tough labor negotia- tions and there was not any extra money for salary increases because the shortfall had taken up all the additional money. Councilmember Hardman asked how the City could protect itself in the future from this type of situation. Mayor DePaulis said it would be a difficult thing to do. Councilmember Godfrey said Utah Power & Light had no choice in the matter because the Public Service Commission had ordered the rebate and other cities would be faced with similar shortfalls. Councilmember Pace asked if there was a rate decrease. Mayor DePaulis said there was not and it was only a onetime refund. He said he would leave this informa- tion with the Council and provide them with a report on the issues later. Councilmember Hardman asked if the Council would need to open the budget to transfer the revenues. Ms. Hamilton said some of the transfers would require a budget opening. Councilmember Hardman thanked the Mayor and Linda Hamilton for the briefing. The meeting was adjourned at 5:45 p.m. 90-170 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Regular Session on Tuesday, May 15, 1990, at 6:00 p.m. in Room 315, City Council Chambers, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Nancy Pace Tom Godfrey Don Hale Councilmember Horrocks was absent. Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Kathryn Marshall, City Recorder and Beverly Jones, Deputy Recorder were present. Council Chair Hardman presided at and Councilmember Hale conducted the meeting. OPENING CEREMONIES Whitehead and Hardman voted no and Councilmembers Pace, Godfrey, Kirk #1. Mrs. Etsuko Freeman from and Hale voted yes. Councilmember the Church of World Messianity Horrocks was absent for the vote. gave the invocation. DISCUSSION: Truman Clawson, #2. The Council led the 966 E. South Temple, former chair- Pledge of Allegiance. man of the Salt Lake Convention and Visitors Bureau, commented on #3. Councilmember Kirk moved what had happened to the Salt and Councilmember Godfrey seconded Palace. He said a team had been to approve the minutes of the Salt assembled to perform some changes Lake City Council for the regular and some of the work had already meeting held Tuesday, May 8, 1990, been completed on the arena. He which motion carried, all members said the team consisted of Salt present voted aye. Lake City, Salt Lake County, and (M 90-1) the State of Utah. He said in the past few years the Convention COMMENTS Bureau had lost approximately $46,000, 000.00 in booked or com- #1. A resolution supporting mitted business because the Salt the expansion of the Salt Palace Palace was not up to the standards facilities with revenues for such of convention centers throughout expansion derived from increasing the country. the City's hotel room tax. Mr. Clawson said if the Salt Councilmember Godfrey read a Palace was expanded and remodeled, resolution pertaining to the Salt studies indicated that approxi- Palace expansion and funding. mately $60, 000, 000.00 would be spent every year by 1993. He said ACTION: Councilmember Kirk that meant the government would moved, Councilmember Pace seconded receive three to five million to table the resolution on the dollars of additional sales. He funding of the Salt Palace Expan- said transient room taxes would sion until June 5, 1990, which increase by 1/2 million dollars, motion carried, Councilmembers and it was expected that a number 90-171 410 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 of additional buildings would be City paid taxes to Salt Lake City, constructed which would bring in Salt Lake County, and the State of additional taxes. He said the Utah. He said if each entity Convention Bureau projected 1, 500 contributed to the Salt Palace the new construction jobs and 7, 800 residents of Salt Lake City would total new jobs by 1997. pay three times towards the expan- sion. He said he hoped as the Council considered their commit- Councilmember Godfrey said ment to the Salt Palace expansion the Council had recommended a good they would delay any action on the way to fund the expansion. He said resolution and give the City, he would like to see the hotel County and State representatives taxes increase because those an opportunity to see if they people were the ones who benefited could find a way to work together the most from the conventions. He to make these good things happen said if Salt Lake City were to for the community. increase the hotel tax, it would not be out of line with such Councilmember Godfrey said cities as Denver, Colorado. He this had been a major concern for said a certain percentage of the the City Council. He said in the hotel tax could be dedicated to proposed budget, Mayor DePaulis the expansion of the Salt Palace. had recommended a property tax He said he would strongly urge the increase and a possible increase City Council to adopt this resolu- in the garbage fee. He said it tion. He said he wanted members was clear to the Council that in the community to understand if funding the Salt Palace was neces- the resolution was adopted the sary but said the Council could Council was not denying its com- not ask the residents of Salt Lake mitment to the Salt Palace. City to fund the Salt Palace. Councilmember Kirk said she He said the Council felt the attended a meeting with the Con- proposed increase in property vention Center Task Force and taxes for police protection was explained to them that the Council necessary, but said there was had considered the resolution. another way for Salt Lake City to She said the Convention Center fund the Salt Palace. Council- realized the position the City had member Godfrey said Mr. Clawson in raising money and would commit made a reference to the fact that to helping reach a long-term there needed to be a commitment to solution. She said a meeting the Salt Palace. He said the would be held within two weeks Council was committed to the Salt with the City, legislators from Palace and had recommended a way the State and members of the hotel to fund the expansion of the Salt community to see if they could Palace so it would not be a burden reach another alternative. to the residents of Salt Lake City. Councilmember Kirk said her suggestion to the Council was to He said it had been a frus- • give the Committee two weeks to trating experience over the years come up with other solutions, and to see people come in with propos- she suggested the Council table als to the City and then realize this resolution. She said the it was a form of triple taxation. Council had made their statement He said the residents of Salt Lake and position clear but had given 90-172 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 the Committee an opportunity to resolution and the committee knew come up with alternative deci- the City wanted to work with the sions. Convention Bureau. Councilmember Whitehead Mr. Clawson said he appreci- expressed concern about triple ated the Council 's position and taxation of city residents in as one of the negotiators, he felt order to fund the Salt Palace He if the resolution passed it would said the residents of Salt Lake be detrimental to the City. City had been taxed enough on projects that were not their Councilmember Whitehead said responsibility. He said Salt Lake the Council wanted to let everyone City did benefit from the Salt know the City' s position. Mr. Palace, but it was built by the Clawson said the Convention Bureau County and they should fund it. knew the Council was sincere. He said the Council had not mentioned He said passing this resolu- the benefits that would accrue to tion would not break the City's Salt Lake City in taxes. promise to help out or stop the Councilmember Whitehead said the meetings with the County to dis- Council did acknowledge there were cuss this issue. He said the some benefits. hotels were the main emphasis of the resolution but it was not Councilmember Godfrey said binding by the Council. He said next year alone the City would the Council wanted to meet and lose $600, 000 due to the State determine a solution for the Salt Legislature. He said he wanted to Palace expansion, but he said to emphasize again that the Council postpone this resolution would was in strong support of the tell people the Council was not expansion and was talking in terms really serious. of the City' s contribution to the Salt Palace. He said the Council Councilmember Kirk said she had stated clearly how the City could not understand why two weeks would fund their share of the would slow the process down and expansion. Councilmember Godfrey she said it would send a signal said the resolution would send a that the Council was willing to positive signal that Salt Lake negotiate. City was in support of the Salt Palace expansion and would send a Councilmember Whitehead said positive message to the by passing the resolution the legislature and the County to join Convention Bureau would know the the Council. Mr. Clawson said City was serious about doing their since there was no need for any part and it would not stop the financial commitment in the City from meeting with them. budget, the City Council should Councilmember Kirk said the com- give the negotiators in this mittee had ask the Council to project an opportunity to talk table the resolution because they about it before they passed the thought it would be a signal that resolution. the City was not willing to nego- tiate. Councilmember Kirk said she had presented all the arguments Councilmember Whitehead asked from the Council to the committee Truman Clawson what harm would be and they thought it would be done if the Council passed the appropriate for the City to do some negotiating. 90-173 PROlEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 Councilmember Pace said she but yet they were the biggest felt the Convention Bureau knew beneficiaries of it. the City was serious about the expansion. She said the Council He said Salt Lake City was in favor of the expansion and benefited next from the Salt in participating in it as well. Palace and the County did not She said she would like to give receive anything from the Salt two weeks to continue the Palace. He said the City wanted negotiations since it was to keep the State at the requested of the Council by the negotiating table. He said it committee. was important that the State understand they had a big respon- Councilmember Whitehead said sibility to invest in the Salt the Council was going to be lob- Palace along with the City and the bied hard on this issue and he County. would rather be lobbied after passing the resolution. Mayor DePaulis said he was afraid if the City went with their Mayor DePaulis said one of position already set, their option the things the City should do was would prejudice the rest of the send a message to the committee, group. He said it was much more but not polarize the City's difficult at that point to get the position at the negotiating table committee to see their more than the State or County responsibility since they would would polarize it. He said he spend the next two weeks reacting saw no harm in delivering the to the proposal rather than message to the table with the thinking about the things they understanding that this was the wanted to bring to the negotiating City' s option. He said if the table. Council had already passed this option by resolution, even though Councilmember Kirk said Bart it was changeable and nonbinding, Barker, who was the chair of the it would send a signal to the Salt Palace Committee, said he State and County that the City' s would commit to the Council that position was confirmed. he would have legislative leaders available to discuss problems. Mayor DePaulis indicated that She said she thought this was the negotiations may benefit without forum the City wanted and it would an official position by the City. be a great opportunity for the City to discuss suggestions the Councilmember Godfrey asked committee had. She said if the Mayor DePaulis if he thought Council did not table the anything could be done in this two resolution, the City would week period. Mayor DePaulis said negotiate with a handicap. he did feel something could be done. He said the largest CONSENT AGENDA benefactor of the Salt Palace was the State of Utah, but their Councilmember Hardman moved problem was that the arena was and Councilmember Godfrey seconded situated in Salt Lake City and in to approve the consent agenda, Salt Lake County. He said it was which motion carried, all members hard for the State to argue the present voted aye. real interests against putting more money into the Salt Palace 90-174 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI•, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 #1. RE: Adopt Resolution 61 Chapter 56, Section 150 of the of 1990 authorizing the execution Salt Lake City Code, relating to of an interlocal cooperation conveyance for value. agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County, ACTION: Without objection, West Valley City, Midvale City, Councilmember Hale referred the Murray City, Sandy City, Draper ordinance relating to conveyance City, South Jordan City, Riverton for value to the consent agenda. City, South Salt Lake City, Orem (0 90-26) City, Bluffdale, The Town of Alta, The Park City Fire Service Dis- UNFINISHED BUSINESS trict and South Davis Fire Dis- trict providing for mutual aid #1. RE: An appropriation fire and emergency medical protec- resolution adopting the final tion. statement regarding 16th Year (C 90-260) Community Development Block Grant Funding (1990-91), and authorizing #2. RE: Adopt Resolution 60 the execution of an interlocal of 1990 authorizing the execution cooperation agreement between Salt of an interlocal cooperation Lake City and the U.S. Department agreement between Salt Lake City of Housing and Urban Development. Corporation and Utah Department of Transportation Materials and ACTION: Councilmember God- Research Section to test certain frey moved and Councilmember materials for the Salt Lake City Whitehead seconded to adopt the Airport. resolution. (C 90-261) Councilmember Pace moved and Councilmember Hale seconded to #3. RE: Set a date to hold amend the motion by approving the a public hearing on June 5, 1990, $50, 000 allocated by CDAC in the at 6:30 p.m. to receive public Mayor' s budget for the Fellowship comment and consider adopting an Foundation, and putting the funds ordinance amending Section 21.- into contingency until CDAC, the 76.120 of the Salt Lake City Code, Mayor' s staff, and the City relating to airport zoning and Council had clarified the intent height regulations. of the grant, which motion (0 90-5) carried, all members present voted aye. #4. RE: Set a date to hold a public hearing on June 5, 1990, Councilmember Hale moved and at 6:40 p.m. to receive public Councilmember Whitehead seconded comment and consider adopting an to increase funding for the ordinance rezoning the property Children' s Museum of Utah located on the southeast corner of renovation by $16, 000 increasing 200 North and 900 West from Resi- the amount from $30, 000 to dential "R-2" to Commercial "C-1" $46, 000; and reduce the classification. contingency by $16, 000 decreasing (P 90-139) the total from $129, 600 to $113, 600, which motion carried, NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS all members present voted aye. #1. RE: An ordinance amend- Councilmember Hardman moved ing Subsection A of Title 2, and Councilmember Pace seconded to 90-175 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 increase funding for the Hardman. Council Chair Hardman Neighborhood Identification asked Councilmember Kirk to Project by $10, 000 and decrease conduct so he could also par- funding of the Neighborhood Self ticipate in the discussion. Help Grant by $10, 000, which motion failed, Councilmember Councilmember Pace said in Hardman voted aye and reference to the funding Councilmembers Whitehead, Pace, allocation for Fellowship Godfrey, Kirk, and Hale voted nay. Foundation there was confusion about what they asked for and what Councilmember Whitehead moved they had been granted. She and Councilmember Godfrey seconded suggested that the $50, 000 be set to express the Council ' s intent, aside in contingency until the as a first priority, to use prior Council received clarification. year' s slippage to increase funding to Planning's CDBG Councilmember Godfrey asked Administrative Program by $45, 000, Councilmember Pace if she wanted and transfer an equivalent general to move the $50, 000 into fund appropriation to Building and contingency depending on the Housing to fund a housing outcome of the meeting with the inspector position and a data Mayor's staff. Councilmember Pace entry position, which motion said this was correct. carried, all members present voted Councilmember Godfrey asked Mrs. aye. Pace if she wanted to approve the funds or earmark them for Councilmember Whitehead moved Fellowship Foundation based on the and Councilmember Godfrey seconded outcome of further negotiations. to express the Council ' s intent as Councilmember Pace said she a second priority to fund assumed that Fellowship Foundation additional improvements at the would get the $50, 000, but at this Westpointe Park, up to $175, 000, point there seemed to be a from prior year' s slippage; if misunderstanding regarding the funds were not available during funds. the year the intent would be to make any additional slippage Councilmember Hale said he funds, whatever the amount, was impressed with the Children's available to Westpointe Park, Museum and had visited the museum which motion carried, all members to view the expansion program. He present voted aye except said the museum had about 77,000 Councilmember Pace who abstained people through it last year and from voting. already this year 50, 000 or 60,000 people had visited. He said Councilmember Godfrey moved attendance this year could surpass and Councilmember Whitehead 100,000. seconded to adopt Resolution 62 of 1990 with the Mayor' s Councilmember Hale said the recommendations on CDBG, as museum was a great program for the amended, which motion carried, all youth, and he wanted to set funds members present voted aye. aside from slippage to do remodeling and develop the DISCUSSION: Councilmember building more expeditiously. Hale said he wanted to participate in the discussion and turned the Stephanie Harpst, Community gavel over to Council Chair and Economic Development, said the 90-176 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 Community Development Advisory had $25,000 appropriated in 14th Committee proposed $30,000 of CDBG Year and $15, 000 appropriated in funding for the Children' s Museum 15th Year. He said the Council although the museum' s request was was appropriating another $10,000 $50,000. She said CDAC' s intent which brought the total was that the additional $20,000 appropriation to $50,000. He said would come from a rebate received he didn' t think projects to date from the John Mansville Asbestos needed that much funding. Trust. She explained that the first payment of $11,400 had been Stephanie Harspt said there received and more would be was $15,000 to $20,000 available received in the next year or two. from prior years for the She said the Children' s Museum Neighborhood Identification would receive about 50% of the Project. Councilmember Hardman total claim, which to date would said he wanted to take the $10,000 be approximately $5,000 since the proposed this year for the city had only received $11, 400. Neighborhood Self Help Grants and Adding this to the $30,000 would $5, 000 from 15th Year in order to bring the funding to $35, 000, so fund the Neighborhood an additional $15, 000 would be Identification Project. necessary to fund the project at $50,000. Ms. Harpst suggested that when identifying the funding the She said if additional Council refer to "previous years' funding came from prior year slippage" in order to maintain slippage, it may not be available flexibility. Councilmember Hard- for another year or year and a man asked if it would be better to half, which would delay the focus on an identified untapped project. Ms. Harpst said if source of money. funding was taken out of contingency then the $50,000 would Ms. Harpst said Councilmember be available for the project Hardman wanted to take $5, 000 from immediately. unused Neighborhood Self Help Grant money which would not be Councilmember Hardman said he appropriate tonight since this had wanted to increase the Neigh- not been reviewed by citizens. borhood Identification Project by She said this would change the $10,000 and decrease the Neigh- scope of a project and had not borhood Self Help Grant by $10, - been discussed by anyone prior to 000. He also wanted to increase this meeting. the Neighborhood Identification Project by an additional $5,000 Councilmember Hardman asked from prior year' s unused funding. Ms. Harpst if there were matching He said his intent was not to federal funds available to assist underfund or cripple the in conducting a city-wide survey Neighborhood Self Help Grants, but regarding citizens' perceptions of if there was unused money their neighborhood boundaries. available he wanted to use it to Ms. Harpst said this project was fund the Neighborhood Identi- submitted by the Salt Lake fication Project, which would also Association of Community Councils help neighborhoods. and would coordinate with the census in order to compile Councilmember Hardman said neighborhood statistics. She said the Neighborhood Self Help Grants the proposal to which 90-177 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 Councilmember Hardman referred Ms. Harpst said a city-wide would give money to Community and survey would be taken of citizens' Economic Development to conduct perceptions of their neighborhood studies regarding neighborhoods. boundaries and the Planning This information would be Department would assist SLACC in submitted to the Census Bureau by preparing the survey instrument. January of 1991 in order to get She said SLACC would then organize statistics for specific areas. and conduct the survey, with volunteers from the Community Councilmember Hardman asked Councils, and compile the results. if this project needed $15,000 or She said this would determine the could proceed with $10,000. neighborhood boundaries to be Rawlins Young, SLACC, said that submitted to the Census Bureau. would depend on the amount of support they received from the Ms. Harpst said a previous Planning Department. survey project, called the Community Progress Survey, had Mr. Young said the proposal received $7,000 in 14th Year from HUD and the Census Bureau was funding. She said $1,000 was used to identify natural housing to conduct surveys in each Council submarket areas, which the RUDAT District. committee had suggested should be done. He said there was a program Councilmember Whitehead asked in place called the User Defined if the City could get people' s Area Program sponsored by the perceptions without any cost by Census Bureau and recommended by having volunteers from the HUD, but the program had to go community councils conduct the through a public process. He said surveys. the City had to find a mechanism to fund the public process. Ms. Harpst said it was important to a certain segment of He said this opportunity was SLACC to extend beyond what had available only every ten years, been done in the past. She said and he said he thought the city they wanted to have hard data would want to know about the based on surveys and they wanted housing submarkets in Salt Lake to know what the boundaries were. City. He said funding could come from slippage, contingency, or Mr. Young said the proposal could simply be appropriated. He came from a study done in said of the 51 census tracks, 45 Pittsburgh called the Pittsburgh were in a state of decline. He Atlas Program. He said two kinds said the city was losing of information were obtained; one population and/or actual housing kind was subjective information stock, and it was time to study compiled from a survey of the the decline of the City' s perception of neighborhoods. He neighborhoods. He said the said Pittsburgh combined the proposed process had been subjective information with recommended by HUD, the Census objective information gathered by Bureau, and Neighborhood USA. their census. This combined information gave an overall view Councilmember Kirk asked why of what was occurring in the the Mayor' s Office did not neighborhoods. He said this recommend this. Mayor DePaulis program was later developed as a said he did not know. Neighborhood Identification 90-178 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI• UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 Program of the Census Bureau. Mr. Councilmember Godfrey asked Young said they needed funding for if CDAC would not recommend this project in order to obtain funding a park. Ms. Harpst said the objective information from the CDAC policy had been not to Census Bureau, which would then be recommend funding for larger combined with the subjective parks. Mr. Godfrey said the information from the survey. Council would make the final decision on CDAC recommendations. Councilmember Godfrey opposed the proposal since SLACC had Ms. Harpst said CDAC had a strongly supported the self-help policy that slippage should roll grants. He said the money had over to the next program year, been accumulating for self-help except for emergency projects, to grants and CDAC recommended that help boost the total CD applications be accepted entitlement. Therefore the intent throughout the year instead of for slippage would be to add it to just once a year. He indicated 17th Year money. that along with the City's funds there would be matching support Councilmember Whitehead said such as labor or money. He said he wanted the Westpointe Park he thought the City would benefit funded since a prior Council had more from the self-help grant made a big commitment to the program. neighborhood. He indicated that if funding didn' t come from CDBG Councilmember Whitehead said then it would come from the he wasn't sure the Neighborhood general fund. Identification Project was necessary and said he thought the Ms. Harpst said the project surveys could be collected without had been qualified using a special cost to the City. income survey of the area that HUD had accepted, and the income Councilmember Hardman said survey should hold for three his intent was not to cripple or years. hamper the neighborhood self-help grants because he supported them. Councilmember Hale said He said he wanted to accommodate CDAC' s recommendation regarding the CDAC request and there was slippage could nullify the available money in the self-help Council 's intent. Councilmember grants. Godfrey reiterated that the Council had the final decision In reference to the Council's regarding allocation of funds. intents regarding slippage funds, (T 90-14) Councilmember Godfrey said the allocations would still go through #2. RE: Set a date to hold the CDBG process. Councilmember a public hearing on June 5, 1990, Whitehead said the intents only at 6:50 p.m. to receive public expressed the Council 's desire comment and consider adopting an regarding use of the funds. Ms. ordinance amending Salt Lake City Harpst explained that the Ordinance No. 35 of 1989 adopting Council ' s intents could possibly the budget of Salt Lake City, put CDAC in a conflict position Utah, for the fiscal year since they may recommend that beginning July 1, 1989, and ending slippage funds be used for a June 30, 1990. project other than those indicated by the Council. 90-179 PROCE•INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 ACTION: Councilmember God- ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey frey moved and Councilmember Kirk moved and Councilmember Kirk seconded to set the date for June seconded to accept the bid 5, 1990, at 6:50 p.m. , which tabulation and adopt Resolution 58 motion carried, all members of 1990, which motion carried, all present voted aye. members present voted aye. (B 89-5) DISCUSSION: Councilmember Hale #3. RE: Adopt a resolution asked for a staff report. Cindy creating Salt Lake City, Utah, Gust-Jenson, Council Executive Special Improvement District No. Director, said the City Recorder' s 38-864, as described in the Notice Office had the tabulation of the of Intention concerning the bids. She said there were two district, plus an additional bids, Weyher Brothers and Workman section of property added to the Construction, and they had been district in reliance upon a waiver duly recorded. She said the and consent, and authorizing the Council needed to accept that City officials to proceed to make report. improvements as set forth in the (Q 90-1) Notice of Intention to create the district. PUBLIC HEARINGS ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey #1. A public hearing at 6:15 moved and Councilmember Kirk p.m. to receive public comment seconded to adopt Resolution 57 of concerning tentative budgets, 1990, which motion carried, all including the Library Fund budget, members present voted aye. for Fiscal Year 1990-91. (Q 90-1) Comment was also received #4. RE: Adopt a resolution regarding proposed ordinances conditionally accepting a bid for relating to: construction work and, subject to approval of the City Engineer, Payment in Lieu of Taxes authorizing the execution of a construction contract for Business Revenue License Fees construction improvements of Salt Lake City, Utah, Special Garbage Pick-Up Charges Improvement District No. 38-864 providing for construction of Storm Drainage improvements in the Central Business District including curb, ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey gutter, sidewalks with brick moved and Councilmember Hardman pavers, driveways, drainage, seconded to close the public trees, planters, tie-in paving, hearing, which motion carried, all irrigation, vault abandonment or members present voted aye. rebuilding, electrical systems, street lighting for one year, and Councilmember Godfrey moved drains, and all other and Councilmember Kirk seconded to miscellaneous work necessary to refer the tentative budget to the complete the improvements; for Committee of the Whole, which issuance of interim warrants and motion carried, all members for the addition of the interest present voted aye. thereon to assessable costs. 90-180 PROC DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 DISCUSSION: Scott Bond, Bureau of Land Management, and Policy and Budget Department, said private donations from the Steiner pursuant to the public hearing he Corporation, the Eccles Foundation had been asked to review the and others. He said the issues of the Fiscal Year 1990- operations of the center would be 1991 budget which had been funded by users. He said the proposed by the Mayor. He said center had been a result of the the first proposal was to increase efforts on the part of a very staffing in the police department dedicated group of citizens in the by forty-six officers and seven City who had worked with this for clerk positions. several years and had finally brought this project to a reality. He said over the past five years the number of police cases Mr. Bond said there were had increased 14% while the number several reductions considered in of officers available to respond the Mayor' s recommended budget due had decreased 11%. Mr. Bond said to the lack of resources. He said the addition of forty-six officers one of the reductions was the and seven clerk positions would neighborhood clean up program allow the Police Department to which was a popular program with become more responsive, increase the city residents. He said the the time spent patrolling their Mayor regretted the recommendation assigned areas, and address the to eliminate it but felt that in drug and gang issues. He said a this time of reduced resources it second initiative proposed in the was a prudent recommendation. He budget was to grant merit said the annual savings projected increases for eligible employees by reducing the neighborhood clean and a 2% one time salary up would be $300, 00. adjustment was also funded. He said another reduction was He said another major in the leaf bag program. Under initiative was the rewriting of this proposal the City would the City zoning ordinance since continue to pick up bagged leaves this ordinance had become placed by residents on the curb outdated. He said the goal was to during the fall, but this make the ordinance more reduction would eliminate free responsive to the needs of the leaf bags which had been developing community. He said distributed through the fire another initiative was to improve stations over the past several the housing stock in Salt Lake years. He said the annual savings City by adding a position of from this reduction would be Housing Coordinator to oversee $60,000. this project and to work on the housing needs in Salt Lake City. Mr. Bond said another proposed reduction was in street Mr. Bond said proposed in the sweeping which would reduce the budget was funding for the level of service from 12 times a operations of the Steiner Aquatic year to 6 times a year in the Center which was now under commercial areas, and from 4 times construction on Guardsman Way and a year to 3 times a year in the would soon be completed. He said residential areas. The annual the construction had been jointly savings of this proposal would be funded by Salt Lake City, Salt $36, 000. Lake City School District, the 90-181 PROC DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI"Y, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 He said also proposed was the triplex owners would have the closure of the Liberty Park pool option to choose how many cans since the pool was in deteriorated they needed to have per month to condition. He said the pool serve their tenants. needed to be completely reconstructed and the cost of He said it was important to doing this would be $300,000, note that even with the proposed however, the on going operations increase to $5.25, the new fee was savings was only $5, 500 per year. in line with, and in many cases below, what was charged in other He said there were other jurisdictions. He said it was reductions proposed in the also important to note that it had recommended budget as well as been the City' s policy to allow several service level increases citizens the option of contracting requested by the departments; most privately for garbage services notable of which would be the Fire should they choose to do so. Department' s request to open Fire Station No. 9 in the International He said another major Center. He said many worthy proposal was shifting of the storm requests from the City Departments sewer program from the general were not included in the fund to the sewer fund. He said recommended budget. He said all this shift would not result in a the City departments were asked to sewer fee increase in fiscal year find ways to reduce their budget 1990/91, however, a separate storm by 2% in order to fund cost drain fee would need to be increases over which the City had developed and put in place by no control. July of 1991. Mr. Bond said the fee that would be studied and He said another major group implemented over this period of of issues dealt with revenue, and time would be based upon finding additional sources and estimates of the amount of water ways to stretch the City' s limited that would drain from any given resources. He said the largest of property into the City storm these was the proposed 2.1 million drains. He said the fee would be dollar property tax increase to assessed to all properties within hire the new police officers. He Salt Lake City. Mr. Bond said it said this equated to a $16.00 was also important to note on this annual increase on a $70,000 home. issue that the City faced If no additional police officers increased Environmental Protection were added, the Mayor' s Agency regulations on storm recommended budget would be drains. This could substantially balanced without a property tax increase future costs, and make increase. funding from the general fund and from the taxes generated in the He said another proposal was general fund prohibitive. an increase in the garbage fee. Mr. Bond said the garbage fee had He said another proposal in been kept artificially low through the recommended budget was a a subsidy from the general fund. paramedic assist fee. He said The proposal was to increase this this was a fee that would be fee from $4.00 to $5 .25 per month. charged through the ambulance bill He said all cans would cost $5.25 and it would be charged only in per month in the future and all cases where a paramedic customers including duplex and accompanied a patient to the 90-182 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI•, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 hospital. He said this fee would Mr. Bond said that was be covered in most cases by health correct and there would be no insurance, medicaid, or medicare increase in funds needed. and would generate approximately $300,000 of additional revenue. Councilmember Hardman said He said the fee would be $100 per there seemed to be a lot of occurrence. questions on the storm drain utility. He asked if this had He said the final proposal been implemented in other was to increase the business municipalities and if so, what license revenue fee from $60 to mechanism they had used to $65. He said the last increase on determine how much storm water was this particular fee occurred in generated on a given property. He fiscal year 1987/88 and the asked if it was based upon linear increased fee of $65 was still footage at the street. lower than that charged by other jurisdictions with comparable rate Mr. Bond said there were structures. several ways to determine this including the size of the property Councilmember Godfrey said and the type of surface. He said someone had been distributing a property which was mostly grass flyers in his district which would absorb most of the storm indicated, or gave the impression water while water on a blacktop to people, that there was a tax parking lot would run off into the increase recommended by the Mayor City' s storm sewer system. He to cover the position of the said those would be some of the Housing Coordinator. He asked Mr. issues studied in the next year. Bond to explain how the City was He said another issue had to do dealing with this position. with water quality and what type of water impurities, if any, might Mr. Bond said the Housing wash off a particular property and Coordinator position was part of into the storm sewer system. the Department of Community and Economic Development budget, and Mayor DePaulis said because within that budget it was of EPA regulations, the City would necessary to make some cuts and be faced over the coming years some increases. He reiterated with certain standards for water that the tax increase would not be discharged into the Jordan River. necessary if it were not for the additional police officers. Councilmember Hardman asked Through reductions and/or other if there had been preliminary revenue enhancements, the Housing estimates to see what the average Coordinator position was included homeowner in Salt Lake City would in the department budget. pay. Mr. Bond said right now there was no specific estimate, Councilmember Godfrey said he but the engineers were working on understood that someone had this particular point. He said in resigned and the position was kept terms of comparison, the amount open to pay off the retirement being transferred this year was benefits. He said the Housing about $800,000. He said the Coordinator would then replace City's garbage fee which was that position. proposed at $5.25 would generate almost four times that much. He said all of the factors needed to 90-183 • 411 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 be considered before the engineers Mayor DePaulis said what he would be prepared to give a good proposed in this budget was to answer. take the storm drain division out of the general fund where it was Mr. Bond said the sewer fee now competing for the same money right now was based upon winter as police officers, fire fighters, water usage and that was not a road maintenance, etc. , and move good indicator of how much a it to the utility division. He property would require use of the would then begin a process of storm drain system. looking at an equitable fee to meet the EPA standards for clean In reference to the business water. He reiterated that EPA revenue license fee, Councilmember standards may lead to treatment Pace asked if there was a facilities, but this was better in rationale for why the City the utilities fund than in the increased the base fee as opposed general fund where property taxes to charging according to the were always at risk to bear the business size. She said she cost of increased burdens. He agreed that a $5.00 amount was not said there would be public a large increase, however, a small discussions of this whole process business would pay $5.00 as would so although he wanted to shift a large business. this to the water utility, the public would be informed about Mr. Bond said they considered hearings where comments could be a simple way to approach the fee obtained regarding fees and which would be consistent with proposals. what other jurisdictions were charging. He said in future years Councilmember Hardman said the City needed to readdress the once it had been transferred and issue in terms of what would be the fees discussed, it seemed like charged on a per-employee basis. there was no way to change back if the public determined this was not In reference to EPA standards what they wanted. for storm water, Councilmember Whitehead asked if every city and Mayor DePaulis said if it town had the same regulation to stayed in the general fund an impose on their residents in the increase in taxes or a new fee to next year. Mayor DePaulis said cover it would have to be this would not require any kind of developed. He said if it moved to increase in the current year. He the water utility the same thing said the City would take a year to would have to be done. He said it analyze the federal regulations was estimated that the City would that would be required of every have to develop $1 million of new municipality in the country. He revenue to cover the EPA standards said the possibility existed that in the future. He asked if the at some point the City would have Council wanted to develop it in a treatment facility for storm the general fund, where it would water before it emptied into the compete with other fees, or in the rivers and streams, but right now water utility fund. this was not the consideration; although EPA was going to get more Councilmember Hardman said he and more restrictive. He also understood, but would like to give said the City was not receiving the residents some indication of any federal money to deal with what the fee would be next year, this issue. even if it was preliminary. 90-184 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY•, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 Mayor DePaulis said they did the average library employee was not have that information still paid 12.8 percent less than available now. He said when it a City employee in a position of happened the public would have the comparable skill and same input whether it was in the responsibility. general fund or not. Councilmember Hardman asked why it She said budget level B would had to be done now and why the take the final step towards salary City couldn't wait for a year when parody with the City and allow the everything was worked out. small increases that were needed to maintain the materials buying Mayor DePaulis said because power, and also health care the City would have to come up increases. She said with budget with about a million dollars more level A they were seeking to meet in general fund revenues this year the salary parody levels for which be added to the property library employees and also to tax. He said he felt he had no match the City employees salary other recourse but to try and make increases that may be given. She the shift this year in order to said she wanted the City Council reduce the impact in the general to recognize that in nineteen of fund. the budget areas they were holding the line or decreasing the budget The following citizens then amounts. spoke. She said the libraries were Cynthia Ong, Chairman of the asking for no increase in budget Library Board, said the Salt Lake other than in the area of reaching City Library was a vital asset parody for employees and trying to which was in great demand. She maintain the buying power for said in about a ten-year period of materials. time, library usage had grown from 700, 000 items per year being Councilmember Hardman asked used to about 1.8 million items what percentage of increase was being circulated. This represented in the budget this year. Ms. Ong 10. 62 items being circulated per said the budget level B was an annum per person in the City, increase of 10% and budget level A which exceeded other cities such represented a 12% increase. as Tucson, Phoenix, San Jose, San Councilmember Hardman asked if Diego, and San Antonio. either of these budgets required a tax increase. Ms. Ong said they Ms. Ong said ten years ago both did but they were not 4.44 items were being circulated. increasing for any other reason She said the library was in high than to reach this salary parody. demand which required library staff to be more productive. She In terms of a tax rate said the Library Board had been increase, Councilmember Hardman concerned because salary levels of asked Ms. Ong to tell the Council the library employees remained what scenario A and scenario B significantly below those of City would generate. Ms. Ong said on a employees in similar positions. per household basis, budget level She said since 1980 the library B represented a $3.20 increase on board had attempted to upgrade the a $70,000 household and budget salary levels and significant level A represented a $3.90 improvements had been made, but increase. 90-185 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 Bob Waldrop, 111 South 600 legislators, and the media for the East #10, said the first purpose purpose of examining in detail the of government was law enforcement City' s revenue problems with and he supported hiring 46 new respect to taxes under State police officers, but felt other control. The committee is aware of areas of government should be cut local government entities across back in order to hire them. the Country who have addressed similar problems with solutions Bob Duncan was opposed to such as Occupational License Tax, transferring $789,000 into a storm Earned Income Tax, Occupational drainage fund and then raising Privilege Tax, City Payroll Tax, over $1 million to replace it. etc. These solutions and others must be pursued with vigor. " He was also concerned about the resolution for the Salt Palace William Boren, 1553 Tomahawk Expansion being passed. Drive, said he was opposed to the Councilmember Godfrey said the transfer of approximately $789,000 resolution did not pass and if the in operating expenditures and Council increased the hotel tax, additional future capital there would be a public hearing so improvement costs from the general the citizens could comment. fund to the sewer utility fund effective July 1, 1990. He said Joyce S. Gordon, 1122 East the City would end up charging the 800 South, said she was opposed to citizens an additional fee, and discontinuing the neighborhood freeing up $800,000 in the general clean up. She said people would fund which could be spent dump the garbage anywhere; such as somewhere else. He said he did abandoned alleys, empty lots or not believe the City would ravines. She said the City would transfer the $800,000 to fund this then have to hire someone to clean project. He said he was concerned up the rats and refuse. She because the City was in serious suggested revising the trouble and struggling. He said requirements and the stipulations the City put the garbage program as to what could be cleaned up. into an enterprise fund and the She said she could understand tax levy was used to pay for those bushes and practical things, but services. He expressed his she felt mattresses and opinion that a year from now the refrigerators should not be picked City would charge the residents up. $2.00 to $3.00 a household to take care of this storm drain fund. He Stan Penfold, 715 2nd Avenue, asked why the City should change said he was the Chair of the Salt until necessary according to EPA Lake Association of Community regulations. He suggested that at Councils (SLACC) . He read a that point the City could bond. portion of the recommendation of the SLACC budget Committee. He He said the City doubled the said he wanted to draw the water fees and was going to drive Council 's attention to the first more people out of the City recommendation under revenue which because of more taxes. He said read, "The committee recommends ten years ago the City increased the following revenue related the sewer fee from 54Q to $1.08 in items: ( 1 ) Hold a series of public order to develop the Northwest meetings in each City Council Quadrant. He said the fee was District inviting citizens, supposed to be reduced after that area was developed. 90-186 II • PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 Mr. Boren said a few years Lee Johnson, 2303 Bryan ago the City dropped the water Avenue, said he disagreed with fees from $1.08 to 800, but at the moving the $789,000 cost to the same time a 6% franchise fee was sewer utility fund without moving added to the City' s own service the funding. He said if the and transferred over to the responsibility shifted, then the general fund. He said the same funding should also shift. He thing had been done with the sewer said he disagreed with the rate. In 1981, the basic rate was increase of more police officers $3. 50 and it was raised to $4. 50, in Salt Lake City. and now it was $6.45. He said the Mayor proposed transferring Howard Stephenson, Utah this new program to the utility Taxpayers Association, said he sewer fund and he asked where the felt the word "crisis" was an sewer utility was going to get understatement in describing Salt $800, 000 to cover the cost. He Lake City' s future. He said said the City was also charging extreme situations required the Sewer Department $250,000 this solutions including reductions in year for the assets that belonged nonessential services, such as the to this operation. Mayor' s recommended reduction of street sweeping, elimination of He expressed his opinion that free leaf bags, closure of a by freeing up this money in the deteriorating swimming pool, and general fund, the City now had the elimination of tax funded money to hire new people. He said fireworks allowing private costs could be reduced if the City fireworks to fill in the gap. would become more efficient. He said he was opposed to an increase He said he strongly opposed in taxes. the 2.1 million dollar general property tax increase. He said he Jewell Rasmussen, 2357 St. also opposed the 1/2 million Mary' s Drive, said his field of dollar tax increase to provide study was public finance and library employees salary increases taxation at the University of of up to 12%. He said this was Utah. He said he was not opposed not the time for that kind of to the proposals, but wanted to property tax increase. He said he address the process. He said when opposed these increases because of the City talked about a fee, there the negative impact higher taxes should be some relation between would have on the City' s ability the amount of the fee and the cost to rebuild its economic base. He of that particular service. He said a tax increase may provide a said he had some difficulty trying short term budget fix but it was to find a relationship between not a long-term solution even cost and benefit with the storm though it was being tied to public drainage system. He said the safety needs. primary beneficiaries of the storm drain system would be the property He was concerned about the owners. He said a property tax prospects for a storm drain was appropriate, but said he would utility fee. He said it had been like the Council to find a process clearly stated as an attempt to and method that would relate to relieve pressure on the general costs and benefits as well as the fund and to provide a general fund amount that each person paid. bailout of $1 million for one year. He also questioned the 31% 90-187 4111 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI• UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 increase in garbage collection Mayor DePaulis clarified that fees. Mr. Stephenson said because the $800,000 was not money that tax payers were being asked to would be used for anything else. sacrifice, he questioned the He said the equipment which the appropriateness of giving a 2% utilities department would receive bonus to City employees in was an asset so they had to pay addition to their merit increases. for it since they were a separate He said long-term solutions to the fund. fiscal crisis included the complete reexamination and Councilmember Hardman asked restructuring of the service Mayor DePaulis if he was saying delivery systems. He said he was that the Public Utilities encouraged by the apparent Department was transferring consensus between Mayor DePaulis, approximately $800, 000 into the the Council and the Taxpayers general fund this year. Mayor Association to work together in DePaulis said he proposed that the forming task forces to provide City transfer the drainage long-term solutions. function from the Public Works Department, which was part of the Virginia Walton, 733 Green general fund, to the Public Street, said she thought the City Utilities fund. He said Public needed to continue the annual Utilities would take it over and garbage pick up. She said she was later the City would determine how in support of paying more garbage to pay for the drainage system fees to keep the annual clean up. with a fee of some type. He said She said she was willing to have the $800, 000 was a savings to the taxes increased to hire more general fund. police officers if the residents did not get reduced services. She Councilmember Hardman asked said she opposed the closing of the Mayor if for this year the the Liberty Park swimming pool. Public Utilities was absorbing the $800,000. Mayor DePaulis said Tom Timbrough, 648 Elizabeth that was correct. He said they Street, said he was in support of would take over the function, the City Library. He said he was absorb the cost this first year, delighted to hear that Salt Lake and then in the future the City City ranked very high in use among would establish some kind of cost cities in this vicinity, and he benefit ratio fee to pay for the wanted to see that continue. He service. He said the savings to said he felt the library worked the general fund was $800,000 very well as it was funded but the which meant that the City did not employees could use a rate have to raise that amount in increase. He supported higher property taxes, or cut deeper into taxes to supply that increase. services. Bill Robbins, 215 E Street, Mr. Robbins said in the said on the issue of transferring residential areas the water the storm drain responsibility consumption was four times the into the sewer utility fund, it amount of water a business or was his understanding that the nonresidential use would consume. $800, 000 being transferred would He said it appeared this burden not include the additional $1 would be mainly shifted to the million the sewer fund would have residents who lived in the to pick up this year. community and he was opposed. He 90-188 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 said it seemed to him that the the police association storm drain system served representing the rank and file everyone, particularly the members of the Police Department. downtown area where there was a He said he wanted to speak in great deal of concrete. He support of the Mayor' s proposal to suggested that a property tax was add forty-six new police officers much more equitable than a user to the department. He said the fee, which he felt would impact Chief' s plan to add sixty-five the individual homeowners officers was a responsible one and significantly. every position was justified. He said the Mayor's decision to Christian Fonnesbeck, 215 A respond by granting forty-six of Street, said he was in favor of those positions was a major step retaining the neighborhood clean in the right direction. He said up program since it was difficult the inability of the citizens to for some people to get their get police service in a timely larger items to the dump. He said manner, and the inability of the he felt it was important for the department to deliver preventive City to maintain this service in police services would be order to retain the reputation of eliminated with more officers. He having a beautiful city. He said said the number of calls for he thought the program could be service exemplified the need for made more efficient. more officers. He said it was not possible to deliver the level of Carol Gish, 2599 South 1100 service the citizens deserved and East, supported the library. She needed unless more officers were said the library had become a hired. He said unchecked crime, great tool in the education of her drug trafficking, and gang son and she supported an increase activity would drive people out of for the library staff. the City faster than any moderate and responsible tax increase. Danielle Jones, 2271 Panorama Way, said she supported Lenore Berendt, 121 S. the public libraries. She said Douglas Street, said she whenever she needed to look up a represented the Library Employees reference for a school paper or to Organization of the Salt Lake City get a book which could not be Library System. She thanked the obtained through the school, it City for the support shown the had always been very reassuring to library and its employees in the go to the public libraries and be past. She said the City' s support able to obtain whatever she had allowed them to provide the needed. The libraries had citizens with quality library programs geared towards children service. She said she was in to guide them to books which would support and endorsed the budget help their personal growth and to submitted by the library board of stimulate children' s interest in directors. She asked the Council reading. The public libraries to continue the tradition of needed funding to continue the support for the library system, programs, accommodate a greater its employees, and the patrons. number of patrons, and benefit readers of all ages. She said balancing the need for improved salaries with other David Greer, 315 East 200 pressing public demands was South, said he was president of difficult. She reminded the 90-189 • PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 Council that when the County excessive people would not be able Assessor missed projected property to afford to live in the City. tax revenue, the library employees agreed to take a 5% across the Lorille Miller, 548 N. board salary cut. She said this Columbus Street, said she felt the allowed the library system to budget choices were wise for the avoid massive reductions in the most part. She said she wanted level of library service provided the neighborhood clean up program to the citizens of this community. to remain and the Liberty Park swimming pool to be left open. She said the library' s She said it was important for proposed budget would enable the lower income children to have library to correct salary positive things to do, since they inequity, cover increased health had enough negatives in their care costs, and reduce the loss of lives. She strongly supported the buying power for library increase in the Police Department materials. She said the Council ' s and also the tax increase. She support of this budget proposal said she supported the sewer fee. would allow the library to continue to provide quality Mary Stevens, 672 8th Avenue, library service to this community. said she was in support of the library increase and felt the Ray Hulstis, 1080 South 400 employees deserved at least a East, opposed hiring more police small increase. She also officers and approved the library supported increasing the police budget. He expressed his opinion department so the police could be that any further tax increases more effective. were unfair until Salt Lake City was growing and taxes were being Councilmember Whitehead said used efficiently. the Council appreciated the comments even though not many Hazel Bailey, 1936 South 1700 people commented on how to make up East, said she was in support of the deficits. He said there were the garbage pickup but opposed a lot of comments regarding raising the garbage fee. She said transfer of the sewer fund, but if the Liberty Park swimming pool the Council put it back in the should be kept open for the kids general fund the cost would be and she was opposed to eliminating $8.00 per household to make up the fireworks. She opposed the 2% difference. He said the transfer wage increase. had to be done. He said the Council would take a lot of the Richard Perschon, owner of recommendations to the Taxpayers property at 643 Washington Street, Association. said he had owned this property for several years and the water He said the time may have bills, sewer fees, and garbage come to look at a different way of collection fees had increased to funding Salt Lake City. He said the point that he now paid monthly he did not think the residents what he used to pay every quarter. could continue to have tax He said transferring the storm increases, but there were problems drain maintenance to the utility and the residents could not deny fund would be another excuse to them. raise fees. He expressed his (B 90-1), (0 90-25), (0 90-22), opinion that fees would become so (0 90-24), (0 90-23), (B 90-2) 90-190 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 #2. RE: A public hearing at 15 highway out of the petition and 6:30 p.m. to receive public held it for further study. He comment and consider adopting an said further study was needed to ordinance rezoning the property deal with the uses as they related located between 800 West Street to the I-15 corridor. and I-15, and 700 South to 1300 South Streets, pursuant to He said there were several Petition No. 400-751-89. changes that would occur if this ordinance was passed. He said it ACTION: Councilmember Hard- would eliminate the above ground man moved and Councilmember petroleum storage tanks, auto Godfrey seconded to close the salvage operations, and outside public hearing, which motion sorting and salvaging of junk or carried, all members present voted recyclable materials. It would aye. add back in an allowance to do recycling operations within an Councilmember Hardman moved enclosed building. Mr. and Councilmember Whitehead Wheelwright also said that any seconded to adopt Ordinance 37 of existing building which did not 1990, which motion carried, all have a fifteen foot landscape members present voted aye. front yard set back would be nonconforming. He said there DISCUSSION: Doug Wheelwright, would also be limits placed on the planning staff, said there were expansion and replacement of these two requests. The first request buildings if they were damaged, was to approve an ordinance that according to the terms of the would change the zoning of the nonconforming use status under the area initiated under Petition 400- zoning ordinance. 751 from its present zoning of Industrial "M-2" to the Industrial He said any new buildings "M-lA" zoning. The second request proposed in the area or any was for the Council to direct the substantial additions to existing City Attorney to prepare an buildings would trigger a ordinance that would change the requirement for a fifteen foot text of the zoning ordinance, landscape set back to be provided Section 21. 68.010, to allow the abutting the new building. He sorting and salvaging of junk and said the Planning Commission had a recyclable materials within an lot of discussion on this item, enclosed structure in the "M-lA" and there had been numerous public zone. He said the second hearings held before the Planning ordinance was not before the Commission and some special Council. He said the Planning meetings set up with the staff. Commission recommended that this He said there was a great deal of ordinance be developed by the City concern among the industrial Attorney and brought back at a property owners that these changes future time. would be more significant than what had been described. He said Petition 400-751 filed by Legislative Intent early Councilmember Pace asked in 1989 was a larger area than was where other "M-2" zoning existed now before the Council. Mr. in the City. Terry Murphy, Wheelwright said the Planning planning staff, said there was "M- Commission took a portion of the 2" zoning located west of I-215 area from 640 West east to the I- and also in the area where the 90-191 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 refineries were located. He said Councilmember Hardman asked if the ordinance was adopted it if Galanis had a permit to proceed would eliminate all "M-2" zoning with construction to make the in this particular area. plant operational. Mayor DePaulis said a permit had been granted. Councilmember Hardman refer- He said he had held up the red to a letter which addressed a building permit until the concerns petition before the City of Councilmember Horrocks and the requesting a tire shredding neighborhood had been satisfied, facility. He asked if this use but they were substantially would still be allowed or if the vested. He said they would petition was held in abeyance operate in a non-conforming status until the Council action on this if they did not conform to this down zoning petition. new zone. Mr. Wheelwright said this was correct. Mr. Wheelwright said it was his understanding that the Mr. Wheelwright indicated request occurred before the zoning that the Council could deal with was changed and so would be the zoning tonight but the continued. Roger Cutler, City subsequent text change was not yet Attorney, said he understood that ready for Council action. Galanis Tire Shredder had fought (P 89-234) the downzoning, and their attorney had met with Mayor DePaulis and #3. RE: A public hearing at resolved the problems so they were 6:40 p.m. to receive public going to proceed. comment and consider adopting an ordinance adding Section 12.72.070 Mayor DePaulis said some to the Salt Lake City Code, as provisions had been worked out amended, relating to public parade that would mitigate any of the regulations. problems. He said Councilmember Horrocks was worried about ACTION: Councilmember Kirk potential odors, the screening of moved and Councilmember Godfrey the fence lines, noise from the seconded to close the public shredding machine, and access for hearing, which motion carried, all the trucks on the side entrance to members present voted aye. keep them off 800 West. He said a plan had been worked out with the Councilmember Godfrey moved particular owner there to and Councilmember Hardman seconded accommodate all those issues, to adopt Ordinance 36 of 1990, except noise. When they started which motion carried, all members operating, the City would monitor present voted aye. the noise to make sure it was within the noise ordinance. DISCUSSION: There was no discussion. Mr. Wheelwright said the type (0 90-16) of process of recycling would not be allowed in an "M-lA" zone #4. RE: A public hearing at unless the Council subsequently 6: 50 p.m. to receive public adopted the text change that would comment and consider adopting an allow those kinds of operations ordinance closing a portion of within an enclosed building. Post Office Place pursuant to Petition No. 400-790-90. 90-192 PROCEIPINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990 ACTION: Councilmember Hard- should be sold, (2) the sale occur man moved and Councilmember at fair market value, and (3) the Godfrey seconded to close the owners agree to give the Heritage public hearing, which motion Foundation a preservation easement carried, all members present voted for the historical aspect of the aye. building. Councilmember Godfrey moved Councilmember Godfrey said he and Councilmember Kirk seconded to could not locate the stipulation adopt Ordinance 38 of 1990, as in the ordinance regarding the amended, which motion carried, all Heritage Foundation. He asked if members present voted aye. it was in the ordinance. DISCUSSION: Doug Wheelwright, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, planning staff, said this was said the stipulation needed to be considered by the Planning included. The Council could Commission at the April 5, 1990, approve the ordinance with the meeting. He said the building in provision that the new language be question was the old Odd Fellows included. Building and was directly south of the New Yorker Club. He said for Councilmember Godfrey sug- years the owners of this building gested that if the Council approve had been paying a lease fee to the the ordinance conceptually with City for under sidewalk vaults and the understanding that the above ground encroachments. He language would be added. said the pillars on the front of the building were on the City Mr. Cutler said Section 4 in street right-of-way. He said the the ordinance would read "The Post property was undergoing a Office Place Associates would refinancing and the mortgagor execute a preservation easement on insisted they acquire the property the property with the Utah on which the pillars rested. Heritage Foundation in a form satisfactory to the council of the He said this was an area said foundation and in a form that comprising thirty-two square feet. may provide tax credits for the He said the proposal had been developer. " reviewed by the City staff, the (P 90-138) various City departments, and all recommended, including the The meeting adjourned at 9: 50 Planning Commission, that this p.m. property be vacated and sold at the fair market value to the petitioner. He said this would not impair the operation of the COUNCIL HAIR street nor the utilities. He said the Planning Commission was not prepared to recommend that the L/21-(1-2dL( vault area be sold, and suggested CI Y RE DER that use of this area be continued under a revocable permit and lease situation. He said there were three conditions from the Planning Commission: ( 1 ) only the 32 feet where the pillars were located 90-193 ‘tfe." 05) )°) 6V SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL y� AGENDA '`2, V\� CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 315 CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUTH STATE STREET Tuesday, May 15, 1990 6:00 pal. A. BRIEFING SESSION: 5:00 - 5:55 p.m. , Room 325 City and County Building, 451 South State 1. Report of the Executive Director. 24 The Council will interview Colleen Minson prior to consideration of her appointment to the Library Board. 3. The Council will interview Kenneth Louder prior to consideration of his appointment to the Urban Forestry Board. 4. Mayor Palmer DePaulis will brief the Council on the City's FY 89-90 revenues. B. OPENING CEREMONIES: 1. Invocation. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Approval of the minutes. C. COMMENTS: 1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2. Citizen Comments to the Council. D. CONSENT: 1. Resolution: Interlocal Agreement / Multijurisdictional Mutual Aid Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County, West Valley City, Midvale City, Murray City, Sandy City, Draper City, South Jordan City, Riverton City, South Salt Lake City, Orem City, Bluffdale, The Town of Alta, The Park City Fire Service District and South Davis Fire District providing for mutual aid fire and emergency medical protection. (C 90-260) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 2. Resolution: Interlocal Agreement / Materials Testing / Airport Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Inter local Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Department of Transportation Materials and Research Section to test certain materials for the Salt Lake City Airport. (C 90-261 ) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 3. Airport Zoning and Height Regulations_ Set date to hold a public hearing on June 5, 1990 at 6: 30 p.m. to receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending Section 21. 76. 120 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to airport zoning and height regulations. (P 90-5) Staff recommendation: Set date. 4. Ordinance: Rezoning Petition #400-786 / American Stores Set date to hold a hearing on June 5, 1990 at 6:40 p.m. to receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance rezoning the property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West from Residential "R-2" to Commercial "C-1" classification. (P 90-139) Staff recommendation: Set date. E. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Ordinance: Conveyance For Value Consider adopting an ordinance amending Subsection A of Title 2, Chapter 56, Section 150 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to conveyance for value. (0 90-26 ) Staff recommendation: Refer to consent. (0 0:Pecr- . , (c7f-y.),A)11 ' MP' F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: ft,-;) X--'-% 1. Resolution: 16th Year Community Development Block__Grant Funding Consider adopting an appropriation resolution adopting the final statement regarding 16th Year Community Development Block Grant Funding ( 1990-91 ), and authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (T 90-14) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 2. Ordinance: Budget_Amendment #k6 Set date to hold a hearing on June 5, 1990 at 6: 50 p.m. to receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 35 of 1989 adopting the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 and ending June 30, 1990. _ -d n i 54 r a 'h= _ ( B 89-5) on I b Ghane Staff recommendation: . et d . bn -$ in., . 3. Resolution: Special Improvement • 64—_g Consider adopting a resolution to create Salt Lake City, Utah Special Improvement District No. 38-864, as described in the Notice of Intention concerning the district, plus an additional section of property added to the district in reliance upon a waiver and consent and authorizing the City officials to proceed to make improvements as set forth in the Notice of Intention to OIL create the district. p;,) r (Q 90-1 ) Staff recommendation: Adopt. , }n / ion" % ' _ V- (- 4 0'-solution. Special Improvement District #38 864 Q . onsider adopting a resolution conditionally accepting a bid for NX):&1) construction work and, subject to approval of the City Engineer, V' t authorizing the execution of a construction contract with \ \p UUU""" for construction improvements of Salt Lake City, Utah Special �� i Improvement District No. 38-864 providing for construction of .1 improvements in the Central Business District including curb, Op gutter, sidewalks with brick pavers, driveways, drainage, trees, 0, planters, tie-in paving, irrigation, vault abandonment or r\Q . JQ ► rebuilding, electrical systems, street lighting for one year, and op , drains, and all other miscellaneous work necessary to complete the oe09 v. .\ improvements; for issuance of interim warrants and for the � addition of the interest thereon to assessable costs. 0 ` (Q 90-1 ) \t- \); 11 Staff recommendation: Accept bid tabulation and Oadopt. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS: / 6: 15 p.m. (4� 1 . Fiscal Year 1990-91 Tentative Budgets �� Receive public comment concerning tentative budgets, including the Library Fund budget for Fiscal Year 1990-91. (B 90-1) -l5 rAin ` 61/1ir` Comment will also be received regarding proposed ordinances 3.5' LltAlry relating to: Payment in Lieu of Taxes, (0 90-25) ; Business Revenue License Fees, (0 90-22) ; Garbage Pick-Up Charges, (0 90-24) ; and Storm Drainage, (0 90-23) . Staff recommendation: Close hearing and refer to Committee of the Whole. 6.).° 94,f11:901S 6:30 p.m. 1`�' (rN/ \\Q1t)' . rPc 2. Legislative Action: Councilmember Horrocks JV" �w*' Iceive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance rezoning the property located between the 800 West Street and I- 15 and 700 South to 1300 South Streets, pursuant to Petition No. 400-751-89. (P 89-234) Staff recommendation: Close hearing and adopt. Pt‘k 6:40 p.m. jjjk� e 60P 3. Ordinance: Public Parade Regulations Y Receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance adding Section 12.72.070 to the Salt Lake City Code, as amended, relating to public parade regulations. (0 90-16) Staff recommendation: Close hearing and adopt. 6:50 p.m. 4. Ordinance: Street Closure Petition # 400-790-90 Receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance closing a portion of Post Office Place pursuant to Petition # 400-790-90. (P 90-138) Staff recommendation: Set date. H. ADJOURNMENT. f' FINAL ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AND/OR ORDINANCES ADOPTED CONCERNING ANY ITEM ON THIS AGENDA. DATED: May 1 1 , 1990 BY: _ CHIEF DEPUfll RE RDER STATE OF UTAH ) COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ss. On the 11th day of May, 1990 I personally delivered a copy of the foregoing notice to the Mayor and City Council and posted copies of the same in conspicuous view, at the following times and locations within the City and County Building, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah: 1 . At 5:00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office, Room 415; and 2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom, Room 343. CHIEF DEPOT CIT RECORDER Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11th day of May, 1990. • Nota - c residing in the State of Utah' Mxi ion ��r�HT d : f".' -.'_`' 451 So.Ste�B Sl PUn 415 � Scat s e Cfty.U 8 ..r» My Ccnrinsbn ,rse'S 1 1 A.,7T 1,1":3 APPROVAL: o, .... yfz..) EXEC IVE DIRE TOR 14 May 1990 Memo to: Salt Lake City Council From: Wyllis Dorman-Li RE: Community Development Block Grant Funds 16th Year 1990-91 I apologize for the lateness of this communique, but I feel it is important that the City Council be informed of additional problems with CDBG funding.for 1990-91. And I would like to suggest that whenever possible, the City Council have its own staff perform an oversight review of projects they are being asked to sign off on. Having recently sat through a briefing to the City Council on the $500,000 deficit with the Ben Alpert Apartments .... it appears that the missing element was Council staff review so that hard questions might have been asked, namely, why wasn't there an engineering review of the mechanical systems performed if the Council was being asked to pledge the credit and thereby to approve the expenditure of 1.7 million dollars by the Housing Development Corporation. While the Mayor had an oversight committee in place, they were his staff members and therefore answerable to his office. But the Council is being asked to pay the tab. You are in receipt of a previous memo dated 1 May 1990 which was a written copy of what was meant to be my public statement to the Salt Lake City Council during the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) public hearings held on May 1, 1990. As part of that statement (1) I asked the City Council to look carefully at a number of the projects funded as to their inherent problems and (2) suggested changes in the CDBG 16th year funding that would free up funds for additional projects much needed in Salt Lake City. I would like to take the process one step further having now read through all of the applications for CDBG funds submitted by private non- profits as well as departments within Salt Lake City. 1. Attached is an announcement from the SLC Community Development Program - Announcements dated April 1990. In the first paragraph it mentions that since the Mayor made his recommendations to the Council on April 17, 1990, "the Salt Lake City Council has been ... gathering additional information about projects from neighborhood and community groups". May I ask who these groups were and the process by which information was gathered from them by the Council? 2. In the attached Salt Lake City Community Development Advisory Committee Intents Regarding 15th Year (89-90) CDBG Projects: (a) Under the title Housing ... Section 108 Loan Payback it reads: "Other funding sources should be sought to fund this. Any profits should come back into the CD program." 1 It obviously was the intent of the CDBG Advisory Committee (CDAC) not to continue to fund the Canterbury Apartments and to have profits from these returned to the CDBG pot of money. From this intent statement I find it difficult to believe CDAC is aware that after six years when the $1.8 million loan is paid off by CDBG dollars that the Canterbury Apartments become the property of the Housing Development Corporation (HDC) with all profits accumulated going to HDC. This project is projected to earn $1.3 million over the next six years with approx. $644,000 needed to pay off the interest on the loan and about $485,000 remaining as profit. Why isn't this money being used to write down the loan as requested by CDAC with CDBG funds used to supplement the yearly revenues? (b) Under Planning ... SLACC Staffing it reads: 'There is a need for SLACC to set its own agenda and have some autonomy from the City which can only be accomplished by separately funded staff." While $50,000 was allocated out of CDBG 15th year funds for this purpose none has yet been released. Further according to Becky Sanchez, 1/2 SLC SLACC coordinator, these monies are going to be released this month and SLACC is going to hire a full-time coordinator and have its office within the SLC Dept. of Community Affairs. Rather than assuring autonomy from the City, being housed within the Dept. of Community Affairs will lead most citizens to believe SLACC is an official department of SLC. Was this the intent of CDAC giving them $50,000 in CDBG monies? Note: Further, SLACC has requested another $50,000 in CDBG funds for the 16th year for office space and staff (Planning Project No. 0004). Thus far CDAC recommended $20,000, staff $13,000, and, the Mayor $13,000. It is important that tied to SLACC's dollars be a statement that they must find office space that removes them from within SLC; especially now that they are requesting legal status as the official SLC citizen participation vehicle. Otherwise most citizens will see them as another appendage of the SLC bureaucracy and I do not believe this is the intent of the City Council? Note: Also see below (d) Housing ... Project No. 0014. While the CityWide Land-Write Down project is commendable as a vehicle to allow for the purchase and resale of land at a discount for housing projects benefiting the low/moderate families, SLACC as the responsible agency, might easily get the City and City Council into another Housing Development Corporation (HDC) fiasco. As described in the CDBG application "...SLC Property Management would purchase property and be responsible for maintaining until sold. But community councils would request which lots to purchase ... with review board of Community Council members, SLACC, and Community and Economic Development staff." After the HDC land purchase fiasco at inflated values and the bond problems created for the City, aren't you again asking for problems. 2 (c) Under Planning ... # 3 "... We feel that it should be the responsibility of the City's general fund to construct community parks ... We have funded some community level parks this year (89-90) in order to complete them, but will not recommend them in the future." Note: CDAC must have overlooked their (89-90) intent statement in some areas but mostly it was the Mayor's staff and the Mayor who chose to fund parks even though CDAC did not as indicated in the following table taken from pages 10-12 of the CDBG Funding Recommendations for 16th Year: Project Previous 1990-91 Number Title Total Request CDAC Staff Mayor 0001 Jordan Park-Restroom and $483,000 $ 95,000 $ 0 $ 95,000 $ 95,000 Picnic Shelter 1000 S 900 W 0003 Playground Installations $100,000 $ 30,825 $ 0 $ 0 CityWide 0004 Fairmont Park Irrigation $375,000 $135,000 $0 $135,000 $135,000 0005 Elks Park Restroom and $ 63,000 $ 11,000 $ 64,000 $ 11,000 Lighting 1300 S Main 0009 Glendale Mini-Park $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $0 $ 0 0011 North Gateway Improve- $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $0 $ 10,000 ment Project 1000 N 300 W 0013 Westpointe Park N.Redwood $250,000 $ 0 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 Phase II 1900 W 1400 N 0014 Park Acquisition/Restoration $94,500 $ 15,000 $ 0 $ 15,000 742 W South Temple (Note: this is not a parks acquisition but a request to provide much needed parking and open space to allow for the utilization of the Nettie Gregory Community Center on the adjoining property. SL County owns said properties and refuses to lease,and SL City and County both refuse to clean up the land thereby allowing it to become a virtual slum. If it weren't owned by SL County, SL City would probably take them to Court to clean up the property. The Nettie Gregory Center tries to maintain the property but is unable to do much since it is owned by the County and they are unable to fence it off,therefore,it often serves as a dwelling for a number of the homeless as well as a garbage dump.) (d) Under Planning - #4 ... "CDBG funds are intended to benefit lower income people and should not be used to fund projects that benefit the City as a whole. These should be funded by all citizens who benefit." Let's look at how projects that would fund lower income people were disregarded yet other projects to fund the City as a whole were recommended. These are taken from the CDBG Recommendations for the 16th Year. (Lower income and minority projects (people of color and handicapped) are in bold with explanations following each.) Project Previous 1990-91 Number Title Total Request CDAC Staff Mayor HOUSING 0007 BHS Boarded/At Risk $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $0 $ 35,000 $ 0 Building Assistance Program 0011 Mixed Use Housing/Artspace $335,000 $129,000 $0 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 0013 Section 108 Loan Canterbury $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 0014 CityWide Land Write Down $150,000 $ 95,000 $ 0 $41,000 Note: See explanation above under(b). 3 STREETS 0002 Euclid Area Street Improve- $100,000 $0 $ 0 $0 ments 100 S 750/900 W 0003 Euclid Area Street Improve- $100,000 $0 $ 0 $ 0 ments 100 S 900/1000 W Note:Euclid is a very low income area with many people of color. People walk in this area. Poor condition of sidewalks makes walking perilous. Run off doesn't drain;freezes in winter. Needs are the same on the entire street. 0005 Learned Ave. Improve- $ 90,000 $ 0 $0 $ 0 ments 40 N 1000/1050 W 0010* Denver Street Improve- $ 5,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 ments 440 E 500/600 S (100,000)* 0013* Lake Street Construction $ 8,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 750 E 800/900 S (126,000)* *Note:While both of these projects are in areas of lower income residents,there is another problem. In the actual applications the requested amounts are as I stipulated above in the brackets. However,that is not the problem. Both applications are requesting monies 'to construct improvements to include pavement,curb,gutter,sidewalk, storm drainage,and,water lines. What isn't mentioned is that Lake Street is only a dead-end half street(800 to 850 S),so why does it need more monies to complete said work than Denver Street which is a through street(500 to 600 S). (Also look at request below for Glendale Area Street Improvements; it's only$50,000 per block.) Following are the numbers broken down in each application for improvements: Lake Street(800/850 S) Denver Street(500/600 S) Street pavement 650 sq.feet 1500 sq.feet Center drain gutter 650 sq.feet Curb,gutter, &assoc. water& storm drainage 3600 sq.feet Sidewalks 2700 sq.feet 3600 sq.feet 0015 Glendale Area Street $325,000 $0 $0 $0 Improvements 900/1300 S 900/1700 W Note:Glendale would cost only$50,000 per block for a total of seven blocks at$325,000. Interesting that the costs are so much lower practically half of even Lake Street from 800/850 South. 0016 Handicapped Access $ 50,000 $ 0 $0 $ 0 State Street & 500 East SIDEWALKS 0001 Target Area Replacement $600,000 $500,000 $300,000 $200,000 $200,000 Note:The description states that these monies are for'Replacement of cracked and displaced sidewalk-100% CD funded in target areas and other CD eligible areas. Seems to me that those who live in these otherwise eligible areas and earn above the low or even moderate income guidelines($38,300 for 1990-91) should have to pay a portion of the sidewalk replacement costs to free up more dollars for other areas where the population is classified as very low income; in keeping with the intent of the CDAC 15th year statement. STORM DRAINAGE 0001 Guadalupe/Jackson $150,000 $ 0 $0 $ 0 Neighborhood Drainage System Note: In their application they state that this project would affect 145 residents,69%of whom are people of color. PLANNING 0006 Swede Town Hazardous $ 8,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Waste and Air Pollution Project 4 3. Further, it seems to me that almost all projects specifically designated for minority (people of color) or handicapped residents were either funded minimally or totally eliminated from any funding. Mentioned above already are Project 0014 (Parks) to provide monies to allow the Nettie Gregory Center to purchase from SL County the property adjacent which is no longer being taken care of in terms of clean up and has become a virtual slum and garbage dump and unusable by the community; Project 0002 and 0003 (Streets) to provide monies for Euclid Area street improvements to include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and, drainage in an area described as very low income with many people of color, where people 'primarily' walk; Project 0005 (Streets) to provide monies for Leaned Avenue street improvements in an area similar to Euclid Area; Project 0016 (Street) to provide monies for Handicapped Access on State Street and 500 East; and, Project 0001 (Storm Drainage) to provide storm drainage system for the Guadalupe/Jackson Neighborhood with 145 residents 69% people of color. Other projects for minorities (people of color), elderly, or, the handicapped that were minimally funded or not at all are: Project Previous 1990-91 Number Tide Total Request CDAC Staff Mayor PUBLIC BUILDINGI 0004 Troy Stables Complex(formerly $ 60,000 $ 0 $0 $0 known as Troy Laundry Complex) (120,000) 0005 Sunday Anderson Senior Citizen $110,000 $0 $0 $0 Center PUBLIC SERVICES 0005 Repair&Upgrade of $ 75,000 $0 $ 0 $0 Friendship Manor 500 S 1300 E 0007 Building Acquisition for $100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Fellowship Hall Note: This in itself is an interesting dilemma. Having discussed with Roger Borgenicht of ASSIST,why hasn't Community Affairs and Planning&Zoning sat down with all the parties:residents,board of Fellowship Hall, and,the Disabled Veterans and tried to work out the problem. Roger's solution was to(1)have the Fellowship Hall purchase the DAV building and lease the lot adjoining from SLC and then access their facility from West Temple or (2)just lease the lot and access from West Temple. This would certainly have resolved the issue of so much traffic day and night on Richards Street. Also I find it interesting that the neighbors requested$55,000 to close off California Avenue which allows access to Fellowship Hall from Main Street and turn that part of the street into a circle. 0010 New Hope Multi-Cultural $ 37,900 $ 23,000 $ 0 $0 $ 15,000 Center Rehabilitation 0014 Literacy Volunteers $ 10,000 $0 $ 0 $0 Building Rehabilitation PARKS 0012 Vietnamese Peace Garden- $ 10,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Jordan Park 1000 S 900 W 5 4. Just a few other comments if you will bear with me. Curious about Planning Project No. 0002 which states the money requested ($12,000) is to hire a consultant to do an urban center site assessment and yet in the application there are two planning staff listed at 8% of their time or a total of $5,750.00 with contractual services only at $5,000; Project 0004 for SLACC staff as per above 2(b); and, Project 0007 request for monies to fund a CityWide survey of neighborhood boundaries to coordinate with 1990 Census. Why would the CDAC fund this and what does it do, redraw SLACC boundaries along with the census data? And of course, last but certainly not least, I find it surprising that SLC needs to have $462,500 of CDBG monies for its administrative staff and seems so cavalier about the need to spend $500,000 on the Ben Alpert boiler system which should have never been allowed to be, without taking any action against those who allowed a building to be purchased without the proper engineering analysis. The breakdown from each department for CDBG funds is also interesting as it seems to provide monies for the upper management in each department without any of the monies needed for the secretarial etc. help. Some of the amounts for departments and salaries seem outrageous in light of the fact that there are so many projects to benefit the lower income, minorities, elderly, and, handicapped that did not get funded. Attachments (2) 6 f ! salaakecity ay Community Development Frock am ANNOUNCEMENTS APRIL 1990 FINAL DECISIONS REGARDING 16TH YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDING WILL BE MADE SOON Mayor Palmer DePaulis made his recommendation on $4,092,000 in 16th Year (1990-91) Community Development Block Grant project funding to the City Council on April 17, 1990. Since that time, the Salt Lake City Council has been considering the Mayor's recommendation as well as gathering additional information about projects from neighborhood and community groups . The Council will soon hold a public hearing to solicit citizen input on CD Projects proposed for funding. This hearing will be held Tuesday, May 1 at 6:20 p.m. in Room 315, City Council Chambers, 451 So. State Street. Handicapped parking and entrance is available next to the building on the east side. The hearing is scheduled so that citizens' and community organizations' comments can be considered by the Council before finalizing its recommendation for annual CD funding. After soliciting input, the Council will close the public hearing and refer the proposed CD program to their Committee of the Whole for further consideration. A list of goals and objectives guiding the City's Community Development program as well as the list of projects proposed to be funded will then be made available to the public and published in both newspapers on Sunday, May 6, 1990. CITIZEN COMMENTS REQUESTED Citizens will have two weeks to make written or verbal comments to the City Council office before the Council makes its final recommendation. Comments must be submitted to the Council Office, Room 304, Salt Lake City Hall, 451 So. State Street. , SLC, 84111 by 5: 00 p.m. , Monday May 14 (ph. 535-7600) . A final decision on 16th Year projects is scheduled to be made at the regular Council meeting on Tuesday, May 15, in the Council Chambers . The actual City CD application must be received by HUD in Denver the first week of June, 1990 . So, this is your last chance for input into the City Council's decision-making process related to next year's CD projects . Remember citizens can make a difference! Come to the public hearing and let your thoughts about the CD program be known. If you have any questions, please call Stephanie Harpst in Salt Lake City Capital Planning and Programming at 535-7115 . An Equal Opportunity Program „ ^ _ 146 , a 0 .. 0041;4t ,,;1 Salt lake City Community Development Advisory Committee Intents Regarding 15th Year (89-90) CDBG Projects HOUSING CDAC strongly recommends that the City complete development of a housing policy that is responsive to citizen concerns and unmet housing needs . Also, the adoption of a housing conservation code which will allow more flexibility in code compliance is suggested. Redevelopment Rehab Program- Administrative costs should be kept to a minimum. All HUD guidelines re: meeting low/moderate income benefit should be met. We recommend using $200 ,000 of the funding for grants available to income eligible senior citizens . CDAC requests that additional appropriate information regarding where rehab funds are being spent and condition of houses receiving funds be made available to them. The community perception re: RDA rehab is that the housing most in need of this program is not benefiting from it. CDAC would like the Mayor to review current RDA policies and guidelines related to how the most deteriorated housing may be rehabbed and which rehab items are required i .e. floor coverings and kitchen counters . Neighborhood Housing Services- ; _'; Up to $20,000 of the $110,000 recommended should be considered for administrative support as this will allow NHS to sell loans back to its secondary market. NHS may be able to increase its revolving loan fund by as much as $150, 000 by doing so. Security Lock Program- All funding should be used for locks, doors, etc. and not go for administration. It could be administered by Crime Prevention if they can do it with less admin monies . Staff should look into transferring the program back to Crime Prevention where we feel better coordination would take place. BHS - Boarded/At Risk and Cleaning and Securing Programs- BHS should work with community councils to inform them of the new program and units that are selected. Community Development Corporation (CDC)- This should be a neighborhood oriented program involving community councils . Section 108 Loan Payback- Other funding sources should be sought to fund this . Any profits should come back into the CD program. BLOCK REDESIGNS i Argyle-Edmonds- Do not fund if UDOT is widening I-15 . _y STREETS, SIDEWALKS, STORM DRAINS General- In the future all design and construction of street projects should be funded by general funds in the CIP (policy issue) . The Public Utilities Department should continue to pay for any needed water line improvements associated with CDBG funded street or block redesign projects . West Capitol Hill Street Improvements- These streets ( 700 N. , 800 N. ) are developed as residential and should be re-zoned from commercial to residential before any street improvements are constructed. Delay one year. Sidewalks- A written City policy is needed to encourage businesses to repair substandard sidewalks in areas where Community Development funded sidewalk repair is done. We recommend a higher funding level for this project so more of an impact in neighborhoods can be made. A high quality of concrete must be used to insure adequate condition of sidewalks in the future. PARKS General- CDBG funds allocated but not used to acquire or develop park projects should be used for further openspace or parks development. Citizens should be involved in designing parks in their areas . The deferred maintenance occurring with older parks should be stopped and repairs made as needed. Also, new funding sources for parks projects should be sought. Athletic Park- Urban Forestry Management- We are concerned about the way city trees are trimmed, cut and cared for in the city. We recommend that a higher percentage of the funding be used for trimming existing or planting new trees and have allocated an additional $10, 000 for this . Warm Springs Slope Stabilization- Sugarhouse Trail System- The $5 ,000 added to funds from the 12th Year Openspace Plan to. complete the original study including stream easements should be allocated to Parks so this project can be completed. PUBLIC BUILDINGS Children' s Museum- This project, although not applied for this year, should be tied into an overall plan for the area. It is better for this facility to remain at this site rather than being moved downtown as part of the Salt Palace expansion. 2 Marmalade Center- This was recommended to improve the exterior of the building which is becoming a neighborhood eyesore rather than an amenity. Glendale Youth Center- We recommend this be funded with the first $25,000 in slippage available. Northwest Community Health Center- This was not recommended for funding because the State and/or County should be responsible for providing health care facilities and programs . This may not be the best site to adequately serve the City's low-income population. It is also not conveniently accessible by bus . Sugarhouse Community Center-(Post Office Building) This building should be acquired for community use when it becomes available. It should not be torn down for a commercial project. PUBLIC SERVICES Shelters- More County and City general fund or other Federal, State, or private monies must be found to deal with the homeless problem because CDBG funds may not be available in the future. Homelessness should not be accepted as a social condition. The problem must be solved. New Hope Multi-Cultural Center- This funding is allocated for rehab of the building with the hope that the completed facility can house a program to address the crime problem within the Asian community. This program should be coordinated with the existing Crime Prevention program. Salt Lake Boys and Girls Club- CDAC supports operating this facility but only at its current level. URBAN AMENITIES Self Help Grants- SLACC's involvement with this program should continue in the areas of committee member selection and development of program guidelines . The program must be well coordinated with community councils and SLACC as it is implemented. To use all funds, another round of applications could be accepted. West High Improvement District- The area around West High is vulnerable to inappropriate development and should be protected however possible. Could a local improvement district be set up which would also leverage other funds? 3 w. PLANNING SLACC Staffing- There is a need for SLACC to set its own agenda and have some autonomy from the City which can only be accomplished by separately funded staff . Other cities in the U.S . , use CDBG funds for this 111111 purpose. Fairmont, Westminster, and Emerson Master Plans- CDAC feels that these neighborhoods , which are limited CD target areas, should have plans developed. This may need to be done by a consultant if the Planning Division cannot accomplish it. This year CDAC has developed some new policies to guide its decisions and actions : 1 . As a general rule, all slippage funds will roll over to the next year. However, CDAC will consider all requests for slippage and may recommend granting of funds on an emergency basis . 2 . Funding of contingency requests will be limited to construction cost overruns or emergencies (as defined by CDAC) only. These will be reviewed and granted on a case by case basis . 3 . CDBG funds for street improvements and parks should only be used for neighborhood level services . We feel that it should be the responsibility of the City's general fund to construct community parks and special collector or collector street. We have funded some community level parks this year in order to complete them, but will not recommend them in the future. 4 . Planning Division proposals that are not neighborhood oriented should be funded from general fund. 5 . CDBG funds are intended to benefit lower income people and should not be used to fund projects that benefit the City as a whole. These should be funded by all citizens who benefit. The Community Development Advisory Committee enjoyed being part of the Community Development planning process . The advisory committee supports the CDBG program and its role in revitalizing city neighborhoods . We request adequate clerical help as required by the ordinance formalizing CDAC . We would also like to thank our staff person Stephanie Loker for her time and attention to our committee. <CDPlanning> CDACintents 4 Slr !qv AnnoL rnett.Lj Evtra pa wcr-L 42 Two ordce,,c3 Adatefn,c, f? &hp_ ,�(, J1 artL � = (tern 6-/) — 6aii plc p,?-op Cvrre/u — (Doc/ wk." 1 J; v z tA-42 WaLt- ancti/d - hthni -d dw/ywd 7 ezd ei v P3 acido c- piece_ -SeSsit-A- 44-e, -1-L :/6 > i'1 =jt;teci'►�.ti 1 I I -' 1 1 a 1 1 1 aa S U M M A R Y O F B I D S : a , 1, a : PROJECT TITLE : d/gt/5/4t55 /S �I'IC• eCIo/ GATE : 7 / 5.//Va, S� --� — --dM-�� , / r , ! .A rn r rove-meet-5 PROJECT NUMBER : 33— E64— l : i : : BASE ; pIteitnxsi e , CONTRACTOR : BID : 06 I : • : : , �1�i1 ro ens / �7��C :/ 7 . V , V 1 ,z }-——— a:r;i : : : i„g 1e. ,9.-4.5/ /l , a 1 , , , a.a : / ,�' /l , , , , , , , r , , 1 1 1 , 1 , , 1 , a(Lorited, ‘',7is-7/: v.; L)b--7?2 -7c;.,- ; l_L67.., ii,-5-9 31.1. . : : , , ' , , //////�)/�S v //I //(///�/1�/�/�� 1 a I , , , a a ��JJJ"' , , , , I a , , 1 1 1 , , . :a d7 /. of e--gyl-yck ll I , Ue] , a , I , a ` : : : ; , 1 , 1 1 a a 1 , , , 1 1 1 1 1 , •aS C , , , , 1 1 1 , I 1 I 1 1 a , 1 � //) a , , a 1 , igIl 6 5 ! ,aa , : : 1 , ; 1 , : a : : ; , , C%4f4' /�--UC : : : : : ,� , , , , , 1 1 , 1 / 1 1 , 1 , a , . , , a a a a a , Sa , 1 I , , , , a 1 , ', , r , , , , a a , C/y1 i?/i'1 J 5 ! ! a . 1 /' i , , 1 , , , i , , , a , a , 1 , , 1 , , , , , , , , , 1 a 1 , , , , , , , 1 1 , , , , , , 1 - _ , ' i 1 , 1 , 1 , , 1 , c)t1...,t1s 1-ic 4Z / ,a;, , ENGINEER ' S EST I MATE 'i_5•g5 074 50 11534, 67q.5d, , ' 1 t , , May 14, 1990 Ron : Following is the information you requested on the West Pointe ( Canterbury ) Park funding : Original amount allocated S150 , 000 Mayor ' s recommended CDBG allocation 75 ,000 TOTAL funding , if Council approves CDBG 225 ,000 The original CDBG request for 1990-91 was S250,000 beyond the S150 ,000 originally allocated . The original $ 150 ,000 is in an interest-bearing account , and so an additional $ 12 ,000 in interest has been accumulated . To bring the park funding up to the original CDBG request for this year , an additional $175 , 000 would need to be allocated . If you wished to subtract the S12 ,000 gained in interest , a total of $163 , 000 would be needed to bring the park funding up to the $250 , 000 request . You may not want to do that , since the park can use all of the funding it can get. Please let me know if you would like more information . Thanks , Cindy .i\p,141 CSC t o ' Qmer1Pr(5' Can '-und t2ctionce, PLAN TO ABSORB $600,000 FRANCHISE FEE LOSS We have developed a plan which includes both increased revenues and reduced expenditures to cover this projected shortfall. It is as follows: Revenue We recently received our final settlement fran the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the 1983 and 1984 floods. We were able to recover $61,000 more than we have booked as'an Account Receivable. Of the $61,000, $48,000 is payable to the General Fund. We can use this as a one- time revenue source to be applied to the shortfall. Expenditures 1. We are currently projecting that we will have approximately $35,000 left in the General Fund contingency at the end of the fiscal year. We will ensure that the $35,000 is not expended. 2. We are estimating that the City will receive a General Fund rebate fran UP&L on our own electric bill of approximately $190,000. That will eliminate the need for $190,000 in expenditures. 3. I have instructed departments that they reduce their collective expenditures by $350,000 by the end of the fiscal year. I have instructed departments to reduce thier expenditures by more than is necessary to cover the currently projected shortfall so that we will have some cushion, thereby ensuring that we end the year with a positive variance of expenditures to revenues. The Council needs to understand that these cuts will be extremely painful for departments particularly in light of has tight next year's budgets will inevitably be. In summary, the plan to offset the $483,000 shortfall is as follows: FEMA Settlement $ 48,000 General Fund Contingency 35,000 Power Bill Savings 190,000 Department Expenditure Cuts 350(000 TOTAL $623,000 PLAN TO ABSORB $600,000 FRANCHISE FEE LOSS We have developed a plan which includes both increased revenues and reduced expenditures to cover this projected shortfall. It is as follows: Revenue We recently received our final settlement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the 1983 and 1984 floods. We were able to recover $61,000 more than we have booked as' an Account Receivable. Of the $61,000, $48,000 is payable to the General Fund. We can use this as a one- time revenue source to be applied to the shortfall. Expenditures 1. We are currently projecting that we will have approximately $35,000 left in the General Fund contingency at the end of the fiscal year. We will ensure that the $35,000 is not expended. 2. We are estimating that the City will receive a General Fund rebate from UP&T, on our own electric bill of approximately $190,000. That will eliminate the nccd for $190,000 in expenditures. 3. I have instructed departments that they reduce their collective expenditures by $350,000 by the end of the fiscal year. I have instructed departments to reduce thier expenditures by more than is necessary to cover the currently projected shortfall so that we will have some cushion, thereby ensuring that we end the year with a positive variance of expenditures to revenues. The Council needs to understand that these cuts will be extremely painful for departments particularly in light of haw tight next year's budgets will inevitably be. In summary, the plan to offset the $483,000 shortfall is as follows: FEMA Settlement $ 48,000 General Fund Contingency 35,000 Power Bill Savings 190,000 Department Expenditure Cuts 350,000 ItYThL $623,000 PLAN TO ABSORB $600,000 FRANCHISE FEE LOSS We have developed a plan which includes both increased revenues and reduced expenditures to cover this projected shortfall. It is as follows: Revenue We recently received our final settlement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the 1983 and 1984 floods. We were able to recover $61,000 ux3re than we have booked as' an Account Receivable. Of the $61,000, $48,000 is payable to the General Fund. We can use this as a one- tine revenue source to be applied to the shortfall. Expenditures 1. We are currently projecting that we will have approximately $35,000 left in the General Fund contingency at the end of the fiscal year. We will ensure that the $35,000 is not expended. 2. We are estimating that the City will receive a General Fund rebate from UP&T, on our cam electric bill of approximately $190,000. That will eliminate the nccd for $190,000 in expenditures. 3. I have instructed departments that they reduce their collective expenditures by $350,000 by the end of the fiscal year. I have instructed departments to reduce thier expenditures by more than is necessary to cover the currently projected shortfall so that we will have some cushion, thereby ensuring that we end the year with a positive variance of expenditures to revenues. The Council needs to understand that these cuts will be extremely painful for departments particularly in light of haw tight next year's budgets will inevitably be. In summary, the plan to offset the $483,000 shortfall is as follows: FEMA Settlement $ 48,000 General Fund Contingency 35,000 Power Bill Savings 190,000 Department Expenditure Cuts 350,000 TOTAL $623,000 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of the Whole on Tuesday, May 8, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. in Room 325, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Don Hale Nancy Pace Council Chair Hardman presided at the meeting. Council Chair Alan Hardman She asked the Council to called the meeting to order. discard the blue calendar of meetings that was distributed last Cindy Gust-Jenson, Council week, and to use the updated Executive Director, reviewed the calendars which were included in calendar of invitations for the the packets last Friday. Council, noting that the Round- table Discussion with the Mayor Regarding the agenda, she was scheduled for May 17 and would indicated an addendum had been be held in the Mayor' s conference prepared for the Post Office Place room. She asked that agenda items property since it would save the for this meeting be submitted to petitioner a large sum of money her before Tuesday of next week so and would assist him in gaining that the tentative agenda could be his financing. ready by Tuesday night's meeting. Regarding Item E-1, payment She indicated that Riverside in lieu of taxes ordinance, the Park had been reserved for the packet information indicated the Thank-You Picnic and had been text would be forthcoming. She scheduled for August 8th. She indicated this ordinance still was noted there was one item which did not available, but should be by not appear on the listing. This May 15th prior to the hearing. was an invitation for the Council She advised that it would be to attend the opening of the acceptable if the Council were to petting zoo this Saturday at 10: 30 act on this tonight, even though a.m. The host of Mutual of Oma- it was the office policy to pro- ha' s Wild Kingdom would be vide this ahead of time. present. Councilmember Hale indicated he would plan to attend Concerning Items F-1 and F-2, on behalf of the Council, since these were on for adoption to other members were not available allow for technical corrections to attend. only. Ms. Gust-Jenson indicated Item F-3 was the next step in that a briefing regarding the the process for this Special Housing Development Corporation Improvement District. She indi- had been scheduled on May 10th cated that Scott Vaterlas, trans- following the RDA meeting, since portation division, would be the RDA had indicated the meeting present to provide information would probably not last past 7:00 during the meeting. p.m. 90-149 PROCEEDINGS Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LikKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 She indicated that Item G-1 along with a memo from Ed Snow, could be referred if necessary, council staff, noting suggested since the Council staff had no changes. information on what kind of commu- nity response might occur during She indicated that Stan the public hearing for this alley Penfold had agreed to the Admini- vacation. stration' s recommended changes in concept. She suggested the Coun- Concerning Item G-2 regarding cil could approve the ordinances alley vacation fee waivers, she in concept and they required said three versions of this ordi- separate motions. nance had been included in the Council ' s packet for their review. The briefing session was She clarified for the Council that adjourned. the fee increase to $35 did not include subsequent advertising for hearings that required advertising four times, which would be a $114 cost to the City. Councilmember Whitehead commented that he would be inter- ested in seeing the city waive the fees for alley closure petitions for a period of time, thereby getting the alleys closed and resulting in reduced expenses for the petitioners and the city. Ms. Gust-Jenson continued, indicating that the Council staff had omitted one of the ordinances pertaining to the airport. She said the Council could act on the ordinance listed on the agenda but the other ordinance would be scheduled again. She indicated that Item G-4 was routine, but Roger Evans from the building and housing division would be present to answer ques- tions. She noted that the hearings for Items G-5 and G-6 would be combined, and that Stephanie Peterson, community affairs divi- sion, and Stan Penfold, SLACC, would be present during the meet- ing. She indicated that informa- tion received this afternoon pertaining to the notification ordinance had been distributed 90-150 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Regular Session on Tuesday, May 8, 1990, at 6:00 p.m. in Room 315, City Council Chambers, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Don Hale Nancy Pace Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Lynda Domino, Chief Deputy City Recorder, and S.R. Kivett, Deputy Recorder, were present. Council Chair Hardman presided at the meeting and Councilmember Hale conducted the meeting. OPENING CEREMONIES Salt Lake and said Salt Lake City was one of the highest for prop- #1. Police Chaplain Bob erty taxes. He said the property Blackhurst gave the invocation. tax level had significant bearing on the city' s ability to attract #2. The Council led the business. He said even growth Pledge of Allegiance. plans for the Northwest Quadrant would not be a panacea. #3. Councilmember Godfrey moved and Councilmember Whitehead He said Salt Lake couldn' t seconded to approve the minutes of count on economic growth alone or the Salt Lake City Council for the the elimination of services to regular meeting held Tuesday, May solve the problems. He offered 1, 1990, which motion carried, all the help of the Utah Tax Payers members voted aye. Association to determine long-term (M 90-1) solutions. COMMENTS Councilmember Whitehead said he appreciated this attitude from #1. Howard Stevenson, repre- the Utah Tax Payers Association. senting the Utah Tax Payers Asso- Councilmember Kirk asked how they ciation, expressed his concern could establish this dialogue. about the crisis which existed Mr. Stevenson suggested that the with Salt Lake City' s ability to Council and Mayor appoint members meet service demands with the from the community to form a stagnant revenue base. He said "think tank" and talk about cre- the Mayor' s budget addressed this ative solutions to the problems issue and presented sound solu- and different ways to provide tions which helped Salt Lake City services. He said the Utah Tax compete for economic growth. Payers Association could coordi- nate finding experts to serve on However, he suggested that the committee and they themselves the property tax increase could be could serve on the committee. counterproductive for economic growth. He referred to a chart The Mayor said in his budget comparing 10 cities competing with he had suggested forming such a 90-151 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 committee and said he wanted this amending Section 5.48.050 and to happen as soon as possible. Chapter 5 . 60, Salt Lake City Code, pertaining to numismatic and #2. Oscar Bourg, 376 East bullion dealers. 700 South, said he submitted a ( I 90-21) letter to the Council in November suggesting ways to improve vacant #3. RE: Approving the re- properties. He said over the past appointment of Bonnie Sucec to the five years he had tried to work Salt Lake Art Design Board. with the city to make laws fair (I 90-4) and equitable in regards to the building codes. He said he wanted #4. RE: Approving the re- to establish a communication link appointment of Ronald Weber to the with the city and expressed his Board of Appeals and Examiners. concerns about the building and ( I 90-17) housing department. #5. RE: Approving the re- Councilmember Hale said the appointment of Ricklen Nobis to Council would take his comments the Salt Lake Arts Council. under advisement. ( I 90-16) #3. Michael Green, 130 South #6. RE: Approving the re- 300 East, addressed the issue of appointment of William Prince to parking. He said he was new to the Recreation Advisory Board. the area and suggested that the (I 90-7) city could provide a booklet to new residents regarding the park- #7. RE: Adopting Resolution ing laws, which in his opinion 54 of 1990 authorizing the execu- were confusing. He said he had tion of an interlocal cooperation received tickets for various agreement between Salt Lake City violations with which he was not and Salt Lake County for improve- familiar. ments at the New Hope Multi-Cul- tural Center. The Mayor said he would talk (C 90-236) with Mr. Green directly regarding this situation. #8. RE: Adopting Resolution 55 of 1990 authorizing the execu- CONSENT AGENDA tion of an interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City Councilmember Godfrey moved Corporation and North Salt Lake and Councilmember Hardman second- City for the provision of Animal ed to approve the consent agenda, Control Services to North Salt which motion carried, all members Lake City. voted aye. (C 90-235) #1. RE: Adopting Ordinance 30 NEW BUSINESS of 1990 repealing Section 11 .40. - 010, Salt Lake City Code, relating #1. RE: Receive public to fortune telling and similar comment at the general fund budget activities. hearing set for May 15, 1990, at (0 90-18) 6:15 p.m. and consider adopting an ordinance enacting Sections 3.40.- #2. RE: Adopting Ordinance 31 010, 3.40.020 and 3.40.030 of the of 1990 enacting Chapter 5. 47 and Salt Lake City Code, relating to 90-152 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 payment in lieu of taxes for city City Code, shifting the responsi- property assets used by the water, bility for storm drainage from the sewer and garbage enterprise Department of Public Works to the funds. Department of Public Utilities. ACTION: Without objection ACTION: Without objection Councilmember Hale referred this Councilmember Hale referred this to the scheduled public hearing. to the scheduled public hearing. (0 90-25) (0 90-23) #2. RE: Receive public #5. RE: A nonadvertised comment at the general fund budget public hearing on May 15, 1990, at hearing set for May 15, 1990, at 6: 50 p.m. to receive public com- 6: 15 p.m. and consider adopting an ment and consider adopting an ordinance amending Section 5.04. - ordinance closing a portion of 070A, of the Salt Lake City Code, Post Office Place pursuant to relating to business revenue Petition #400-790-90. license fees Sections 6.08. 110A and 6. 16.030 relating to beer and ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey liquor consumption regulatory moved and Councilmember Kirk license fees. seconded to set the date, which motion carried, all members voted ACTION: Without objection aye. Councilmember Hale referred this (P 90-138) to the scheduled public hearing. (0 90-22) UNFINISHED COUNCIL BUSINESS #3. RE: Receive public #1. RE: Consider adopting a comment at the general fund budget corrected ordinance closing a hearing set for May 15, 1990, at portion and vacating a portion of 6:15 p.m. and consider adopting an an alley adjacent to 2185 South ordinance amending Subparagraph B 900 East, pursuant to Petition No. and adding a new Subparagraph G, 400-756-89 . to Section 9 .08.030 relating to garbage pickup charges; changing ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey the State Code reference in Sec- moved and Councilmember Kirk tion 9 .08.030E to reflect the seconded to adopt a corrected current state law for indigent Ordinance 5 of 1990, which motion abatement of taxes; and revising carried, all members voted aye. Section 9.08.070 relating to (P 89-379 ) refuse container specifications, Salt Lake City Code. #2. RE: Consider adopting an ordinance extending the limits ACTION: Without objection of Salt Lake City to include the Councilmember Hale referred this "OKOA Annexation"; zoning the to the scheduled public hearing. annexed area Commercial "C-3A" by (0 90-24) amending the use district map of Section 21 . 14.020; amending the #4. RE: Receive public Salt Lake City Council District comment at the general fund budget and School Precinct Boundaries hearing set for May 15, 1990, at Map; amending the Liquor District 6: 15 p.m. and consider adopting an Map of Section 6. 08. 120; and ordinance amending Sections 2.08. - specifying conditions for the 100 and 2.08. 110 of the Salt Lake annexation. 90-153 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey provide for any joint use or joint moved and Councilmember Whitehead access to or through the vacated seconded to adopt Ordinance 32 of alley, and allowing such access 1990, which motion carried, all from the west end of the alley, members voted aye. excluding access to the last 58 (P 89-347) feet, more or less, at the east end adjacent to Mr. Thomas's #3. RE: Consider adopting a property; and request that the resolution conditionally accepting City Attorney' s Office prepare the a bid for and authorizing execu- necessary agreements, which motion tion of a contract with Utah Power carried, all members voted aye. and Light Company for operating, patrolling and maintaining street DISCUSSION: Alan McCandless, lighting within Salt Lake City, planning and zoning staff, out- Utah, Lighting District No. 1 (The lined the area on a map. He said "District" ) . six single-family homes abutted the alley and except for one twin ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey home, the remainder of the lots in moved and Councilmember Whitehead the 12th Avenue subdivision were seconded to adopt Resolution 56 of vacant. He said the current 1990, which motion carried, all zoning was Residential "R-2" . members voted aye. He said after review, various DISCUSSION: Cindy Gust- city departments recommended that Jenson, Council Executive Direc- the entire alley be vacated, which tor, said one bid was received was the intent of the petition. He which was from Utah Power and said the city' s position was to Light. She said the bid amount vacate the alley or to proceed was $158, 208.48 for a three-year with improvements and leave it period. open for public ingress and (Q 90-2) egress. PUBLIC HEARINGS He said most of the abutting property owners did not express a #1. RE: A public hearing at strong opinion either way about 6:20 p.m. to receive comments and the alley, except one property consider adopting an ordinance owner (Mr. Tirrell ) who wanted his vacating a portion of an east-west half the alley if it was vacated. alley between K and L Streets, and He said Mr. Tirrell owned four of llth and 12th Avenues pursuant to the vacant parcels and wanted to Petition #400-764-89. add the alley to his property. ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey He said the development moved and Councilmember Hardman coordination team reviewed this seconded to close the public request and the alley was bonded hearing, which motion carried, all as part of the 12th Avenue subdi- members voted aye. vision. He said the options were to vacate the alley with half Councilmember Whitehead moved going to adjacent property owners and Councilmember Kirk seconded to and having no access, vacate the adopt Ordinance 35 of 1990 vacat- alley with right-of-way agree- ing the entire alley, requiring ments between the property owners agreements between the abutting to allow ingress and egress, or property owners as necessary to leave the alley open and improve 90-154 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 it with curb, gutter, black top, Councilmember Godfrey asked etc. if property owners needed access to garages. Mr. Thomas said they Councilmember Godfrey asked wanted access to their back yards about the option to vacate only but didn't need the alley for half the alley. Mr. McCandless access to their garages. He said suggested the eastern portion he spoke with the other property could be vacated with the western owners and had sent a registered portion remaining open for access. letter to each of them. He said the only owner which possibly Councilmember Godfrey asked opposed was Galen Tirrell. Mr. if keeping the western half open Thomas said he tried to devise a would solve access problems for way which would be a win-win several of the property owners. situation for all property owners Mr. McCandless said the same thing so the contractor' s bond would not could be accomplished by vacating be used to improve the alley. the entire alley and having the owners sign access agreements. Councilmember Pace asked Mr. Thomas what he wanted to accom- Councilmember Hardman said plish with his half of the alley. the alley would be vacated as a Mr. Thomas said he planned to public right of way and would construct a garage, which would become a private right of way, and fit better using the extra 7.5 asked if the alley would physical- feet which the alley would pro- ly be closed. He said he didn't vide. He said this would also see an advantage of doing this. make a permanent abutment to Councilmember Godfrey said if the through traffic. Council vacated the alley it would stop public use. He said the Liz Davis, 723 llth Avenue, owners could either move their said she wanted to continue to use fences back or could put a gate the alley for access to the back across the entrance of the alley. of her property. She said she agreed with the suggestion of David Thomas, petitioner, closing half the alley to elimi- said he didn't want this alley to nate the thoroughfare. become a thoroughfare and he wanted to vacate the alley so he John DeLaney, on behalf of could use his portion for a ga- Bridget Smith at 717 llth Avenue, rage. He said the neighbors said major access to the back of agreed to vacating the alley and the established properties on llth signed the petition except for one Avenue would be impossible without property owner, Mr. Ludlow, who the use of the alley. He suggest- didn't object but didn' t want to ed that the city vacate the alley sign the petition. He asked the but create an easement so the Council to vacate the alley with property owners could agree to necessary access agreements be- ingress and egress. He said Ms. tween the property owners. He Smith wanted access to her back said he wanted to vacate the alley yard through the alley. on the east end which had not been accessible for 12 years and said Councilmember Pace indicated access could remain from the west that people didn' t seem to oppose end if that ' s what the owners having the east end of the alley wanted. vacated (abutting Mr. Thomas's property) , but there was concern 90-155 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 about how the Council would deal of the property by 7. 5 feet. with the remainder of the alley. Councilmember Whitehead agreed Councilmember Pace pointed that this seemed to be the case. out that access could be limited if the owners on the north wanted Hal Ludlow, 558 K Street, to add their half to their proper- said he didn't want to acquire his ty and the owners on the south half of the alley. He said he wanted to use the alley for ac- opposed owning the property and cess. then having to maintain it. He didn' t oppose Mr. Thomas' s plan. Councilmember Kirk asked if there was a recommendation from Galen Tirrell, owner of the the community council. Council- abutting vacant lots, said he member Pace said there was no supported vacating the alley and discussion about this issue at the dividing the property among the community council meeting. owners. He said he didn' t see a need for through traffic. He said Councilmember Whitehead said if the property was developed, he he wanted to vacate the alley and would have to pay to improve the let the property owners decide how alley and he opposed this. Mr. to use the property. Tirrell said if the west end of the alley remained open for access Councilmember Hale reiterated by the property owners, there two options: Vacate the alley would probably have to be a turn- with half going to each abutting around. He said a portion of his owner, or vacate the alley and property would have to be used for require the property owners to this, which he thought was unfair. sign agreements regarding the use of the alley. Councilmember Whitehead asked if the property owners would have Roger Cutler, city attorney, to improve the alley if the city suggested that the Council consid- vacated it and provided an ease- er the ordinance which contained a ment. Allen Johnson, director of condition requiring agreements planning and zoning, said if the between the abutting property alley was vacated it would revert owners as to the use of the vacat- to private ownership and the city ed alley. He said if the property would not cash the bond. owners could not reach an agree- ment, then the alley would not be Councilmember Pace asked Mr. vacated and the ordinance would Tirrell if he would incorporate not be published. He said his his half of the alley into the office could assist with drafting buildable portion of his property. the agreements if that was the Mr. Tirrell said he would. Council 's desire, although another party would be required to obtain Councilmember Godfrey re- the necessary signatures. ferred to the undeveloped property and asked if there would be room Mr. Thomas offered to hire an to construct garages after the attorney to draft the easement alley was vacated. Mr. Johnson agreements. said vacating the alley would not (P 90-85) prevent constructing garages on those two properties. He said the #2. RE: A public hearing at vacation would increase the width 6 :30 p.m. to receive comments and 90-156 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 consider adopting an ordinance with all city departments involved enacting Section 21. 10.090 provid- in the process to find out how ing for the waiver of fees for much it cost. He then listed those alley vacations in residential figures: zoning districts. • Planning Administration - $30.00 ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey Attorney - $45. 00 moved and Councilmember Kirk Engineering - $80.00 seconded to close the public Fire - $113.00 hearing, which motion carried, all Planning Division - $160.00 members voted aye. Public Utilities - $40.00 Real Property - $50.00 Councilmember Godfrey moved Recorder - $165.00 and Councilmember Whitehead sec- Transportation - $51.00 onded to approve in concept an ordinance waiving processing fees He said this totalled almost for petitions requesting alley $750.00. vacations in residential zoning He suggested that the Council districts when 80% of the abutting add language to the ordinance property owners have signed the specifying that if 80% of the petition; for a period of six abutting property owners signed a months from the effective date of petition requesting an alley the ordinance no fees would be vacation in a residential zone, no collected; after six months from filing fee or advertising would be the effective date of the ordi- charged. He said the city wanted nance, petitioners submitting new to reduce overhead and let the requests would pay the public petitioner do more of the work. hearing advertising fee but not He also asked the Council to the city' s petition fee; petitions establish an application process in the process prior to the end of whereby the petitioner would be the six-month grace period would responsible for providing all the not be subject to the fees, which information required to evaluate motion carried, all members voted and process the request. Staff aye. would still review and verify the accuracy of information but their DISCUSSION: Allen Johnson, time would be reduced significant- director of planning and zoning, ly. explained the current city policy regarding alley vacations. He Councilmember Pace asked what said they supported alley vaca- happened to the assessed value of tions as long as the vacation property once the alley was vacat- didn' t create new problems or ed. Mr. Johnson said the owner compound existing problems, i.e. , would pay taxes on the additional create dead ends, restrict the use footage. of the alley for emergency vehi- cles, or remove needed access for Councilmember Whitehead asked abutting property owners. He also why Mr. Johnson didn' t want dead- said if 100% of the abutting end alleys. Mr. Johnson said that property owners signed the peti- in emergency situations, rescue tion then the city waived the vehicles could be trapped by filing fee. another car and it was difficult to back the equipment out of a He said in researching this dead end. issue the planning staff consulted 90-157 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 Cindy Gust-Jenson, Council vacating the alley. Executive Director, said if the Council wanted to consider the Councilmember Godfrey asked "80%" suggestion, they could adopt why the curb cut had to be re- the concept with a time limit and moved. Mr. Johnson explained that then she would work with the it constituted a parking place on attorneys office to get the appro- public property. He said in some priate ordinance. cases people would use these areas to store recreational vehicles. Councilmember Horrocks asked In other situations the curb cut how many months it would take to collected debris as storm water vacate all the alleys. Mr. ran down the gutter. Johnson said this was an ongoing issue and the ordinance, until Councilmember Pace asked why repealed, would exclude residen- Councilmember Godfrey wanted a tial alley vacation petitions from six-month "free" period. Mr. a filing fee. Godfrey said the "free" period would give people the incentive to Councilmember Godfrey said close alleys and the "800" re- if 1000 of the abutting property quirement would cause people to owners didn't sign the petition, talk to their neighbors and solve then the hearing had to be adver- problems before the issue reached tised four times which cost about the Council. This way issues $114.00. He said he didn ' t oppose could be resolved quickly. the "80%" suggestion but he wanted a time limit on waiving advertis- Councilmember Whitehead said ing costs. He suggested a six- that at some future date he wanted month "free" period and said he to continue discussion regarding wanted the ordinance to reflect the issue of curb cuts. that after this period, the peti- tioner would pay the cost of No one from the audience advertising. addressed this issue when Councilmember Hale called for Councilmember Whitehead asked public comment. if city policy still required (P 90-86) construction of a curb once an alley was vacated. Mr. Johnson #3. RE: A public hearing at said that was the policy if an 6:40 p.m. to receive public com- alley was totally discontinued for ment and consider adopting an access. He said they required the ordinance amending Section 21.76. - curb cut to be removed and the 080 of the Salt Lake City Code, parking strip to be planted with relating to airport zoning and sod. He said if there were ease- height regulations. ments established as part of the vacation then the curb cut and ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey drive approach remained. moved and Councilmember Horrocks seconded to close the public Councilmember Whitehead hearing, which motion carried, all expressed concern that the city members voted aye. would mandate curb reconstruction and require the neighborhood to Councilmember Godfrey moved pay for it. He said he didn' t and Councilmember Hardman seconded think the curb cut should have to to adopt Ordinance 33 of 1990, be removed as a condition of which motion carried, all members 90-158 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 voted aye. #4. RE: A public hearing at men tco nrseiceery e adubtiin g com- nDISCUSSION: Allen Johnson, director of planning, said the ordinance adopting Chapter 18.92 zoning ordinance contained a enacting the Uniform Code for section dealing with height limi- Building Conservation with certain tations around the airport. He amendments. said he received a request from Louis Miller, director of air- ACTION: Councilmember White- ports, to bring the zoning ordi- head moved and Councilmember nance into compliance with Federal Godfrey seconded to close the Aviation Regulations, Part 77, public hearing, which motion dealing with the glide path around carried, all members voted aye. the runways. Councilmember Whitehead moved He said the current ordinance and Councilmember Kirk seconded to required a 40 to 1 slope which adopt Ordinance 34 of 1990, which meant that for every 40 feet from motion carried, all members voted the end of the runway, the air- aye. craft had to be up 1 foot. He said this regulated the height of DISCUSSION: Roger Evans, buildings around the airport. director of building and housing, Under the new proposal the glide said the Uniform Code for Building slope would be much steeper and Conservation was published nation- would change to 20 to 1 so the ally about four years ago. He aircraft would approach at a much said this document had been steeper glide angle. discussed by the Planning Commis- sion, the Historic Landmarks He said this change would be Committee, the Housing Advisory consistent with the Federal Avia- and Appeals Board, and the Board tion Regulations. He said the of Appeals and Examiners. He said Planning Commission heard this all these boards approved the issue and recommended approval. code. Councilmember Whitehead asked He said this code would the purpose of the change. Louis provide implementation tools for Miller, director of airport, said developers and architects working this change would accommodate with existing buildings going relocating Utah Power and Light through change of use. He said power lines north of the airport. they had used this code for the In reference to construction of a last three years with the Board of new runway, he said without the Appeals in addressing renovations change they would have to move the of existing buildings in the power lines about four miles downtown area. further north. He reiterated that this change would comply with No one from the audience federal regulations. addressed this issue when Councilmember Hale called for No one from the audience public comments. addressed this issue when (0 90-17) Councilmember Hale called for public comments. *NOTE: The next two hearings were (0 90-5) considered together since the issues were related and the time 90-159 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 for the scheduled hearings had and it was at one of those meet- passed. ings that this group decided to form a task force to review all #5. RE: A public hearing at the issues involved in recognition 7:00 p.m. to receive public com- and notification. She said the ment and consider adopting an Mayor and community affairs staff ordinance amending Title 2 of the assisted in this process. Salt Lake City Code by adding a new Chapter 2. 60.010, and related She said the committee devel- sections dealing with recognition oped an outlined of issues around of neighborhood based organiza- recognition and notification and tions. the outlines were then drafted into ordinance form. The communi- #6. RE: A public hearing at ty council chairs and SLACC offic- 7: 10 p.m. to receive public com- ers voted to support the two ment and consider adopting an drafts and the chair of SLACC had ordinance amending Title 2 of the met with the Council in a Commit- Salt Lake City Code by adding a tee of the Whole meeting. She new Chapter 2. 62.010, and related said after a lengthy process they sections, dealing with notifica- were now at the point of having tion of certain actions to recog- the public hearing before the nized or registered organizations. Council. She said there was one amendment proposed by the Adminis- ACTION: Councilmember Kirk tration. moved and Councilmember Whitehead seconded to close the public Stan Penfold, chair of SLACC, hearing, which motion carried, all reviewed the two ordinances. In members voted aye. regards to the recognition ordi- nance he said it recognized the Councilmember Hardman moved existing process for neighbor- and Councilmember Pace seconded to hoods to communicate with the refer the two ordinances back to city. He said he hoped to in- the committee that drafted them in crease citizen participation and order to consider the public input awareness, and increase support of which was received at the hearing, community councils and neighbor- i.e. , legal standing, affirmative hood-based organizations by offi- action, etc. , which motion car- cially recognizing the process. ried, all members voted aye. He said it was vital for neighbor- hoods to become involved and this DISCUSSION: Stephanie Peter- ordinance formalized the process son, office of community affairs, of participation. said these ordinances were the result of a petition from the Regarding notification, he Salt Lake Association of Community said this ordinance would require Councils. She said the intent was the city to notify neighborhood- to have the existing process of based organizations of pending citizen participation officially actions which would affect their recognized and provide for an area. In order for neighborhood early notification process regard- organizations to participate in ing city actions. the city process, he said it was critical that they be aware of She said the Mayor had guar- pending proposals. He said the terly meetings with community ordinance required that Planning council chairs and SLACC officers, Commission and Board of Adjustment 90-160 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 agendas be mailed to neighborhood- Penfold said this ordinance would based organizations requesting require the city to notify the those mailings and that they also community councils so there was a be notified of proposed condi- method for people to participate tional use hearings. He said this in the process of reviewing a was designed to improve communita- proposal. tion between the city and the neighborhood-based organizations Mr. Whitehead asked why the by allowing adequate time for community councils couldn' t just neighborhoods to evaluate propos- be on a mailing list. Mr. Penfold als in their area. said past experience showed that the notification process was not Councilmember Kirk asked if consistent. The ordinance would organizations would receive noti- require the city to allow the fication without requesting it. neighborhood the opportunity to Mr. Penfold said current city review proposals. policy was that organizations would only receive agendas by Ms. Peterson said the ordi- request. He said if an organiza- nance also included a clause tion did not request notification allowing a person to request a 4- then they would not receive agen- week delay in the Planning Commis- das. sion if the community council didn't have a chance to review a He said there was no way for proposal. the city to know which organiza- tions existed unless they request- The following people support- ed mailings. He said organiza- ed the ordinances: tions requesting to be put on the mailing list would receive all Hermoine Jex, 272 Wall Planning Commission and Board of Tony Reiter, 842 E. 500 So. Adjustment agendas, plus copies of Larry Livingston, 165 A St. applications for conditional use Rick Reese, 965 Fairview permits within 600 feet of the Jerry Miller, 322 So. 1000 E. neighborhood. Ms. Peterson said Brigitta Wray, 718 Northview notification would automatically Ernest Dixon, 77 C St. be sent to each recognized orga- Fae Nichols, 120 MacArthur nization. Other groups would have Bruce Boyes, 754 E. Roosevelt to request to be put on the mail- Janet Geyser, 4715 Mile High ing list. Kim Anderson, 768 N. Redwood Paula Julander, 1467 Penrose Councilmember Whitehead asked if the intent of the ordinance was Hermoine Jex suggested adding to establish the mailing list. two paragraphs on page three of Mr. Penfold said it was to give the recognition ordinance, which organizations the opportunity to would be paragraphs D and E: D) be on the mailing list plus it Any new council being formed shall required the city to notify spe- not encroach on any other estab- cific organizations if there was lished council boundaries unless a an issue pending in their neigh- joint agreement is made between borhood. any councils affected by such action, and shall so record with Councilmember Whitehead asked the city the results of the agree- why they needed an ordinance to ment. E) Any existing estab- establish a mailing list. Mr. lished council or councils having 90-161 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 any unresolved boundary differenc- Salt Lake City Council. es shall come to an agreement by January of 1991, and shall record In regards to challenging a with the city the results of the Board of Adjustment or Planning agreement. Commission decision and suing, he said this was a legal issue that She said these additions the courts would determine. He would clarify that people needed said not every citizen could to work together. She also re- challenge every action of a par- ferred to a boundary map which the ticular board. They would have to Council had and said she didn't have some particularized relation- think it was sufficient. She said ship to the dispute. He said the it wasn't the map which was put court had the right to make the together by the SLACC councils, evaluation as to whether or not and said there needed to be a map someone had a relationship to an which SLACC approved and all the issue and could sue. existing councils agreed to. He said the ordinance would Tony Reiter brought up the provide more of an opportunity to issue of "legal standing. " He establish a relationship because suggested that these ordinances the groups would be recognized. would give official recognition to But it would not guarantee stand- the neighborhood groups so they ing on all issues. In regards to could have some standing on is- including stronger language in the sues. In regards to geographical- ordinance to vest standing, he ly-based groups, he said having said the courts would probably them organized in this way would consider this but it still would include everyone. not automatically guarantee stand- ing to either sue or appeal an Councilmember Godfrey asked issue. He also said stronger if the ordinances gave the groups wording to that effect caused him legal standing. Mr. Reiter said concern for several reasons in- he wasn't sure if they did or cluding the potential increase in didn't but he said the ordinances lawsuits. would help make their position stronger. Councilmember Kirk said she was concerned about Ms. Jex's Councilmember Hardman said he suggested additions and asked Mr. drafted a letter to the city Reiter his opinion. She said she attorney asking if the recognition understood that any group who ordinance would confer any stand- wanted to organize and deal with a ing upon neighborhood councils in specific issue could do so even if appellate cases to the district they were within another district. court. He said he hadn't yet Mr. Reiter concurred with Mrs. received a written statement but Kirk and said he wanted to include asked Roger Cutler, city attorney, everyone. Councilmember Godfrey to respond. also said he was uncomfortable with Ms . Jex' s suggestions. Mr. Cutler said the ordinance was designed to allow any not-for- Mr. Cutler said the purpose profit group to receive notices. of the ordinance was to recognize It also recognized geographically- the community councils as listed based community councils as having on the map and the Council would a unique relationship with the have to approve any boundary 90-162 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 changes. He said other organiza- Ernest Dixon suggested that tions could overlap as long as the Council pass the ordinances they formed a nonprofit status and and modify them later if neces- met the requirements of the sary. He reiterated that the ordinance. He suggested that Ms. notification ordinance was impera- Jex' s amendments were inconsistent tive and was a way to get more with the present philosophy. people involved. Fae Nichols suggested that it was an indi- Councilmember Hale read Kim vidual ' s responsibility to make Anderson's comments which encour- sure they were represented and aged the Council to vote in favor notified. She said the ordinances of the ordinances and stated that would not exclude anyone and said early notification was essential all citizens were welcome to the for residents to have knowledge of community council meetings. issues in the neighborhoods. He said well-informed citizens made Bruce Boyes said the ordi- well-informed voters. nances didn' t preclude citizens from becoming a part of the mail- Larry Livingston suggested ing list but clarified the noti- that these ordinances would be fication process and formalized helpful because they would provide participation in city government. indemnification. He said people Janet Geyser said she had helped were suing citizen groups as a way organize community councils and to intimidate them. He agreed said they were another way to that the ordinances would lend process information. She said the weight to the argument that a involvement of citizen groups neighborhood had "standing" in the helped provide information to the appeal process. decision makers. She also said the indemnification clause would Rick Reese said the existing help deter frivolous lawsuits. system was powerful and effec- She said she thought the decision tive, and anyone could become in- makers needed to know who the volved. He said this system was community councils were and said an effective way to facilitate community councils could diffuse a any citizen or entity that wanted lot of problems at the neighbor- to work with neighborhoods on hood level. issues. He also said the process facilitated the neighborhoods in The following people opposed working with the City Council and the ordinances: accessing city government. Wyllis Dorman, 634 E. 700 So. Jerry Miller cited specific Paul Wharton, 436 E. 8th So. incidences in which the community Robert Archuleta, 978 council was involved and had won Cheyenne on issues affecting the neighbor- Ethel Hale, 436 E. 8th So. hood. Brigitta Wray said that as Sister Jo Marie Arredondo, neighborhoods faced encroachment 27 C Street by developers, the community Karen Silver, 764 So. 200 W. councils could work on these issues and keep the neighborhoods Wyllis Dorman said if the strong. She said a neighborhood ordinances passed in there present was stronger as a group than as form they would turn SLACC into a individuals trying to resolve powerful lobbying tool for a small issues. percentage of Salt Lake City's 90-163 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 citizens organized around estab- and Community Development Block lished geographic areas. She said Grant funds; whose local and city- this group didn' t represent in its wide boards were not duly elected membership the ethnic or racial by a standard election procedure diversity of Salt Lake City, its or appointed by the Mayor; and disabled citizens, or members of whose membership makeup negated established issue oriented, city- the rule of one person/one vote wide citizen organizations. since the geographic-based coun- cils and/or associations had She then asked several ques- disproportionate representation. tions: 1 ) Why did Salt Lake City want to extend official recogni- Paul Wharton asked why the tion to geographically-based process needed to be formalized if community councils, neighborhood people were already receiving councils and associations, and the notification. He also said the Salt Lake Association of Community notification seemed to involve Councils rather than to acknowl- only zoning issues and he suggest- edge the important contributions ed there were other issues that of all city-wide and/or neighbor- the citizens needed to be con- hood community citizen organiza- cerned about. He pointed out that tions. according to the ordinance, fail- ure to give notice did not affect 2 ) How did Salt Lake City the validity of the act or give differentiate between community rise to any private action, so he councils, and neighborhood coun- asked what the binding effect was cils and associations, and why did if there were no consequences. the language in both ordinances vacillate between recognition of He said he didn't know this neighborhood-based versus communi- proposal was being considered and ty-based organizations. asked who had participated in the process to develop the ordinances. 3 ) Why was there no affirma- He said he lived in an area with a tive action policy requirement in neighborhood council and he hadn' t the proposed ordinances for such been informed of this issue. In organizations to be officially reference to geographically-based recognized. groups, he said he thought the Council 's concern should be how to 4) Why did the city feel the get citizens to participate. He need to create another layer of said he believed this was a gov- bureaucracy to separate the citi- ernment of people and not places. zens from government input and information. Robert Archuleta said citi- zens needed to have a bigger 5 ) Why did the city want to impact on the decision-making create a political battle ground process within the City Council . for neighborhoods versus city-wide He said he supported the idea of minority, disabled, and/or issue- having more citizen input but he oriented organizations. said he didn' t support the pro- posed recognition policy. Mr. 6 ) Was it constitutional for Archuleta said many people had not Salt Lake City to designate one been informed that these ordinanc- citizens group as the officially es were being drafted and he said recognized advisory organization, many citizens didn't get notified and provide them with paid staff of issues unless they belonged to 90-164 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 one of the recognized groups. Sister Jo Marie Arredondo expressed her concern with the He said he represented the lack of affirmative action in the Utah Hispanic Association and committee that drafted the ordi- would inform them of these ordi- nances. nances. He said they had not taken a position because they were Councilmember Hardman said he not aware of the ordinances. He supported the ordinances, but said they found that traditionally said the Council had received an in this state, in the last 10 amendment to the notification years, minorities had been left ordinance and said he had a out of many things. He said they question regarding the legal were making an effort to become a standing issue. He asked Mr. part of issues and said SLACC had Penfold his opinion regarding the done a good job but many people administration' s amendment. did not belong to that group. He said there were other groups that Mr. Penfold said he personal- would like favored status. ly supported the amendment but was reluctant to speak on behalf Councilmember Pace said she of the community council chairs. thought the notification ordinance He said he preferred to have an would be a big step in the dissem- opportunity to present the amend- ination of information. ment to them. He also said he didn't think the issue of "stand- Ethel Hale said she didn't ing" was completely resolved and know what purpose these ordinances he wanted to pursue whether or not would serve. She also said people the ordinance dealt with that were left out since the ordinances issue. He said he was advised by addressed organizations. She said the planning department that they the ordinances would set up bu- may want to incorporate into the reaucratic barriers and said the ordinance notification about Council form of government had conditional uses and special been organized for geographical exceptions that go before the representation. She suggested Board of Adjustment. He said he that the Councilmembers were would feel more comfortable re- responsible to provide the commu- solving these issues. nication in their districts. She stressed that she didn't want the Councilmember Whitehead said ordinances to take away the free- he was concerned with the provi- dom to assemble because a group in sion allowing a 4-week delay on an area was already organized. issues pending community council review. He said the community Cindy Gust-Jenson, Council councils met only once a month and Executive Director, read comments he didn' t want the ordinance to from Karen Silver. She said Ms. create a situation that would Silver suggested that on page 3 of delay every issue because a commu- the notification ordinance, the nity council hadn't reviewed it. Council delete 2. 62. 030(D) regard- Councilmember Hardman said the ing failure to give notice, since administrative amendment addressed it negated the process of notifi- that situation. cation. Ms. Silver also suggested that in lines 2 and 3 in 2. 62. - Mr. Penfold said it was 040(A) the Council delete the currently an informal policy of words, "of which. . .given notice. " the Planning Commission to refer 90-165 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 conditional uses and zoning chang- es to the community councils for discussion and input. He reiter- ated that the ordinances formal- ized the current procedure. He expressed concern that the Board of Adjustment didn't follow the same procedure since they also dealt with conditional uses. He said he didn't anticipate that the ordinance would cause delays and said it dealt strictly with zon- ing-related issues. (0 90-20) The meeting adjourned at 9 :40 p.m. COUNCIL CHAIR CITY RECORDER 90-166 smi DEN MS M. SARGENT 1�_\�� ,`� ".�� p`/� 1.i,_Il� CHIEF OF FIRE DEPARTMENT 799-4101 FIRE DEPARTMENT 315 EAST 200 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 To: Salt Lake City Council Date: April 17, 1990 Re: Multijurisdictional Mutual Aid Fire and Emergency Medical Protection Agreement Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council agrees to this Agreement. It provides for fire and emergency medical protection services beween Salt Lake City Corporation, Salt Lake County, West Valley City, Midvale City, Murray City, Sandy City, Draper City, South Jordan City, Riverton City, South Salt Lake City, Orem City, Bluffdale City and the Town of Alta and the Park City Fire Service District and South Davis Fire District. Availability of Funds: None Required. Submitted by: Dennis M. Sargent Fire Chief Salt Lake City Fire Department DMS/aa Attachments - 1 Original - 16 Copies RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND SALT LAKE COUNTY, WEST VALLEY CITY, MIDVALE CITY, MURRAY CITY, SANDY CITY, DRAPER CITY, SOUTH JORDAN CITY, RIVERTON CITY, SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, OREM CITY, BLUFFDALE, THE TOWN OF ALTA, THE PARK CITY FIRE SERVICE DISTRICT AND SOUTH DAVIS FIRE DISTRICT WHEREAS, Title 11 Chapter 13, U.C.A. , 1953 as amended allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1 . That it does hereby approve the attached agreement generally described as follows : A Multijurisdictional Mutual Aid Fire and Emergency Medical Protection Agreement . 2 . Palmer A. DePaulis , Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City this day of , 1990 . SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: AF P;:OVED;A!;TO FORM Salt ik ti;:cat y s - Date _T ° .l� CITY RECORDER RESOLUTION NO. DATE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS- SIONERS OF SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, WEST VALLEY CITY, MIDVALE CITY, MURRAY CITY, SANDY CITY, DRAPER CITY, SOUTH JORDAN CITY, RIVERTON CITY, SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, OREM CITY, BLUFFDALE, THE TOWN OF ALTA, THE PARK CITY FIRE SERVICE DISTRICT AND SOUTH DAVIS FIRE DISTRICT. WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13 , U .C .A. , 1953 as amended, allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services ; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes ; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Salt Lake County, Utah: 1 . It does hereby approve the attached agreement generally described as follows : A Multi jurisdictional Mutual Aid Fire 1 and Emergency Medical Protection ! Agreement . 2 . The Interlocal Cooperation Agreement attached hereto is hereby accepted and approved by the Salt Lake County Board of Commissioners and the Chairman is hereby authorized to execute said agreement for anti on behalf of Salt Lake County and to act in accordance with its terms . APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1990 . SALT LAKE COUNTY ATTEST: By Chairman Board of County Commissioners Salt.: Lake County Clerk R910 Clues • -2- MULTIJURISDICTIONAL MUTUAL AID • FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL PROTECTION AGREEMENT TIHIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of _ 19 by SALT LAKE COUNTY, a body corporate and politic of the State of Utah, and the following municipal corporations of the State of Utah : SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, WEST VALLEY CITY, MIDVALE CITY, MURRAY CITY, SANDY CITY, DRAPER CITY, SOUTH JORDAN CITY, RIVERTON CITY, SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, OREM CITY, BLUFFDALE, and the TOWN OF ALTA, and the PARK CITY FIRE SERVICE DISTRICT and SOUTH DAVIS FIRE DISTRICT. RECITALS A. The parties desire to enter into a mutual interlocal agreement for fire protection services that will be beneficial to all parties . B . The parties are entering into this agreement pursuant to the provisions of the Utah Interlocal Cooperation Act , Section 11-13-1, et seq . , Utah Code 1953 , as amended, to provide a joint mutual agreement relating to mutual response, use of fire fighting equipment and personnel to fight structure fires and the use of equipment and personnel in providing emergency medical response both within and outside the normal geographical jurisdictional limits of each party. C . Each party desires to cooperate with and assist the others in times of fire and in incidents requiring emergency medical response . NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the mutual promises and conditions contained herein, the parties agree as follows : 1 . The area to be served by this agreement is the unincorporated area of Salt Lake County and within the corporate limits of Salt Lake City, West Valley City, Midvale City, Murray City, Sandy City, Draper City, South Jordan City, Riverton City, South Salt Lake City, Bluffdale, Orem City, and the Town of Alta and within the district boundaries of the Park City Fire Service District and the South Davis Fire District . 2 . The fire department of each party agrees to respond to structure fires and fire service-related emergencies within the geographical area of a requesting party to this agreement . The responding party shall provide equipment and manpower based upon the need as determined by the requesting party' s incident commander and the equipment and personnel that are available as determined by the senior officer on duty for the responding party. 3 . The fire department in which the fire or emergency incident occurs shall be first dispatched to handle the initial response . Upon determination by the incident commander, a request for assistance can then be made to the Fire department from the next closest jurisdiction to assist in handling the incident . If the incident commander determines that there is -2- still a need for additional assistance from fire departments that are parties to this agreement, the same dispatching procedure shall be used. 4 . Only upon determination in advance by the requesting department that a fire is of such a nature that more than one fire department (agency) must respond will there be a joint response request . In such a case, upon the request of the incident commander of the jurisdiction where the fire occurs , as many agencies as necessary will be dispatched and respond as provided herein. 5 . Responses by secondary or responding agencies under this agreement shall be made only when the absence of fire or emergency medical personnel and/or equipment will not jeopardize the fire or emergency medical services of the party furnishing assistance to the requesting agency. 6 . Each party to this agreement shall be responsible for its own workmen ' s compensation and other benefits accruing to the members of their own department and such other employee-related matters , including insurance, as would normally occur for their own department . 7 . The responding agencies shall report to the incident commander requesting assistance at the location to which the equipment and personnel are dispatched and shall be subject to the orders of that incident commander . The incident commander shall he the senior fire officer of the fire department of the jurisdiction in which the incident is located ; e . g . , if the -3- incident is within Murray City, then the Murray City Fire Department senior officer shall be in charge. 8 . Equipment and personnel from responding agencies shall be released by the incident commander when the services of the responding agency are no longer required or upon notification that the personnel and equipment of the responding agency are needed within its own jurisdictional area . 9 . Each party waives all claims against the other parties for compensation for any loss, damage, personal injury, or death occurring as a consequence of performing services pursuant to the terms of this agreement . 10 . Each responding agency shall have the same privileges and immunities from liability when responding to a request for assistance outside of its jurisdictional area as it has in the performance of its duties within its own territorial jurisdiction . 11 . The effect of the death or injury of any firefighter who may be killed or injured outside the territorial limits of the governmental entity where he is a member of the fire department and while that department is rendering services outside of its jurisdictional limits pursuant to this agreement shall be the same as if he were killed or injured while that department was functioning within its own territorial limits ; and such death or injury shall be considered to be in the line of duty. -4- 12 . No party to this agreement shall be reimbursed by any other party to this agreement for any costs incurred while rendering services pursuant to the terms of this agreement . 13 . No separate legal entity is created by the terms of this agreement ; to the extent that this agreement requires administration other than as set forth herein, it shall be administered by the governing bodies of the parties acting as a joint board . There shall be no real or personal property acquired jointly by the parties as a result of this agreement . 14 . This agreement shall not relieve any party to this agreement of any obligation or responsibility imposed a party to this agreement by law, except that the performance of a responding party may be offered in satisfaction of any such obligation or responsibility of the requesting party to the extent of actual and timely performance thereof by the responding party. 15 . This agreement shall have no fixed date of expiration but shall continue for not more than a period of five (5) years from the date of execution hereof, and the date of execution shall be the date upon which the last party executes this agreement . Notwithstanding the above, each party reserves the right to cancel this agreement for any reason prior to the expiration date by giving thirty (30) days prior written notice of such cancellation to the other parties . 16 . This agreement shall be submitted to the authorized attorney for each party for approval as to form in accordance -5- with the provisions of Section 11-13-9 , Utah Code 1953 , as amended . 17 . Each party agrees to indemnify, release, hold harmless and defend the other parties hereto from all claims, damages, liabilities, and judgment for injury to persons , loss of life, or damage to property occurring because of the negligent acts or omissions of the party, its officers , or employees . 18 . Nothing contained herein is intended to affect or amend any initial action agreement currently in effect between any of the parties hereto . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this agreement as of the date first written above, which shall be p the date that the last party to this agreement executes the same. SALT LAKE COUNTY ATTEST: By Chairman Board of County Commissioners APPi O': D f.S TO FORA SaM L a C my AHor •ONWO Salt Lake County Clerk By l -.. ly Homey DOB 3-7- 1 d SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION ATTEST: By Mayor City Recorder -6- WEST VALLEY CITY ATTEST: By Mayor City Recorder MIDVALE CITY ATTEST: By____ Mayor City Recorder MURRAY CITY ATTEST: By - Mayor Salt Lake County Clerk SANDY CITY ATTEST: By Mayor City Recorder -7- DRAPER CITY ATTEST: By Mayor City Recorder SOUTH JORDAN CITY ATTEST: By Mayor City Recorder RIVERTON CITY ATTEST: By Mayor City Recorder SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY ATTEST: By Mayor City Recorder - ----- ------ -8- OREM CITY ATTEST: By Mayor City Recorder BLUFFDALE ATTEST: By Mayor City Recorder TOWN OF ALTA ATTEST: By Mayor Town Clerk PARK CITY FIRE SERVICE DISTRICT ATTEST: BY Title -9- SOUTH DAVIS FIRE DISTRICT ATTEST: By Title R951 -10- STATE OF UTAH ) . ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this _ day of , 19 personally appeared before me D. Michael Stewart and H. Dixon Hindley, who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Salt Lake County, and the County Clerk, respectively, and that the within and foregoing instrument was signed in behalf of Salt Lake County by authority of the Board of County Commissioners at a regular meeting held on the day of 19 , and that said persons duly acknowledged that Salt Lake County executed the same . NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My Commission Expires : ******************** STATE OF UTAH ) . ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 , personally appeared before me _ and who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Recorder, respectively, of Salt Lake City Corporation, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My Commission Expires : -11- STATE OF UTAH ) ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 , personally appeared before me and who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Recorder, respectively, of West Valley City, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My Commission Expires : ******************** STATE OF UTAH ) ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 , personally appeared before me and who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Recorder , respectively, of Midvale City, a municipal corporation of the State of Utali, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same . NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at_ My Commission Expires : -12- STATE OF UTAH ) . ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this _ day of , 19 , personally appeared before me and who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Recorder, respectively, of Murray City, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My Commission Expires : ****************** STATE OF UTAH ) . ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 , personally appeared before me and _ who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Recorder , respectively, of Sandy City, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and said persons acknowledged to Inc that said corporation executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My Commission Expires : -13- STATE OF UTAH ) . ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 , personally appeared before me and who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Recorder, respectively, of Draper City, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same . NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at _ My Commission Expires : ****************** STATE OF UTAH ) . ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 , personally appeared before me _ and who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Recorder, respectively, of South Jordan City, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My Commission Expires : -14- STATE OF UTAH ) . ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 personally appeared before me and who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Recorder , respectively, of Riverton City, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same . NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My Commission Expires : ****************** STATE OF UTAH ) . ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 , personally appeared before me and who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Recorder, respectively, of South Salt Lake City, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same . NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My Commission Expires : -15- STATE OF UTAII ) ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this day of 19 personally appeared before me and who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Recorder, respectively, of Orem City, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same . NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My Commission Expires : ****************** STATE OF UTAH ) . ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 personally appeared before me _ and _ who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Recorder, respectively, of Bluffdale, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same . NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at_. My Commission Expires : -16- STATE OF UTAH ) . ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 , personally appeared before me and who being by me duly sworn , did say that they are the Mayor and Town Clerk, respectively, of the Town of Alta , a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same . NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My Commission Expires : ****************** STATE OF UTAH ) ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 , personally appeared before me and who being by me duly sworn , did say that they are the and , respectively, of the Park City Fire Service District , and said persons acknowledged to me that said Park City Fire Service District executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My Commission Expires : -17- STATE OF UTAH ) : ss . County of Salt Lake ) On this _ day of , 19 , personally appeared before me and who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the and , respectively, of the South Davis Fire District , and said persons acknowledged to me that said South Davis Fire District executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My Commission Expires : R 9 51 -18- E l V i C;IY A_ TORNEY'S o -:LE DATE 4- ad DENNIS M. SARGENT SMilp �\aemaf�C? T�l(Vim®_ti©\LA #141 CHIEF OF FIRE DEPARTMENT 7994101 FIRE DEPARTMENT 315 EAST 200 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 April 6, 1990 Frank M. Nakamura Assistant City Attorney 451 South State, Suite 505 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Frank: As per our conversation, please find enclosed a proposed County-wide Interlocal Cooperation Agreement which provides for "Multijurisdictional Mutual Aid Fire and Emergency Medical Protection" . Please review the contract as to form and if it meets the needs of the City, and then return it to me. I will then prepare it for submission through the City process. S 'n erely, 9 rankM . F re ce Acting Chief FEF:mc Enclosure AKF �i BOARD J. Aian Blodgett, Chair PALMER A. DEPAULIS, Mayor Curtis E. Ackerlind, Jr. Don A. Mackey * Eddie P. Mayne i-- L OUIS E. MILLER Joseph Rosenblatt * Patrick A. Shea � Director of Airports Elaine B. Weis • Thomas K. Welch J • �� April 26, 1990 Mr. Alan Hardman, Chairman and the Salt Lake City Council Salt Lake City Council Office 451 South State Street City & County Building Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Chairman Hardman and Council Members: Subject: Interlocal Agreement for Bituminous Material Testing Services for various construction projects at Salt Lake City International Airport between Salt Lake City Corporation and the State of Utah, Department of Transportation, Materials and Research Division. Fiscal Impact: The not-to-exceed total cost is $5,000.00 for FY 1990/91 . Discussion: Salt Lake City Corporation does not have the equipment to perform certain bituminous materials tests and the attached agreement will enable us to obtain these services from the Utah Department of Transportation, Materials and Research Division. Therefore, it is respectfully requested that the City Council adopt the above referenced agreement. Respect dily, L u E. Miller Enclosures City airport Atuthnrhy i_1ian ;_, ;32 _. "E.DI) 575-2400,ITeiefax: {601) 575-2679 DF6 11 01 40 4/80 • STATE OF UTAH PROFESSIONAL CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT This Agreement entered into this 1st day of July , 1990 between the Department of Transportation, Materials & RPSearrh SPnt i nn Department Division and Salt Lake City Corporation (Airport Authority) Name *Social Security No./ AMF BOX 22084 Federal ID No. Address • Salt Lake City, Utah 84122 City State Zip Code is for the purpose of providing temporary (less than one fiscal year) professional services as described below: Viscosity @ 1400 F. abs Viscosity @ 275 F. , cs Penetration @ 770 F. , dmm Ductility @ 39.20 F. , cm Saybolt Viscosity, ssf Toughness and Tenacity in. lb RTFO Test Services are to begin Jv1y 1 , 1990 and will terminate June 30, 1991 The total amount for the services as outlined above shall not exceed $ Payments shall include: Personal Service hours X hourly rate = Travel miles X rate = Other (Description) Tecting nn approximate '3(1 hitnminnuc camplec Amount = pliiq other misc , testi.ag as .r-equested_ Amount = Amount = TOTAL = $5,000.00 DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL PROGRAM DIRECTOR CONTRACTOR DEPARTMENT HEAD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE * Contractor acknowledges by signing this agreement that no Social Security, Federal,or State taxes will be withheld from payments under this contract. However, payments under this contract may be taxable and an information return (IRS Form 1099) showing total contract payments made during the year will be sent to all contractors and to the Internal Revenue Service. RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MATERIALS AND RESEARCH SECTION WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13, Utah Code Ann. , 1953, as amended, allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. It does hereby approve the attached agreement generally described as follows: An agreement for the State's Department of Trans- portation Materials and Research Section to test certain materials for the Salt Lake City Airport. 2. Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah, is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, - Utah, this day of , 1990. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER RLM:rc �.� 6-2 MIKE ZUHL SAL II GITY_ ORPORATION, LEE KING ti r..,:.vim •...w vi..-w. +ia:r w •xrvsa+.•.r ac zwaay.:a INTERIM DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7777 TO: Salt Lake City Council March 20, 1990 Re: Zoning Amendment - Airport Chapter Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on May 8, 1990 at 6:40 p.m. to discuss the Airport's request to amend Section 21.76.080 and 21.76.120 of the Zoning Ordinance relating to airport zoning and height restrictions. Availability of Funds: Not applicable. Background:and Discussion: This amendment will bring the height limitation slope ratios for two runway approach zones into compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77. This change will allow a steeper approach slope which allows a higher height limit closer to the runway. Basically the modification would be: Section 21.76.080 - "Utility runway visual approach zone" slope ratio from a 40" horizontal to 20' horizontal while the 1' vertical remaining the same. Section 21.76.120 - "precision instrument runway approach zone" slope ratio from a 100' horizontal to 50' horizontal while the 1' vertical remains the same. The Planning Couttuission has reviewed this amendment and recommends approval. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's Office has prepared the necessary ordinance and is ready for your action. ._ . Su mitted by: A't/74 B. Z terim Director lf/ 1 ` a40r SALT'LAKE'CITY CORPORATION; - ALLEN C.JOHNSON. AICP PALMER DEPAULIS PLANNING DIRECTOR MAYOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING March 16, 1990 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7757 Mike Zuhl , Director Community and Economic Development - City and County Building Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re : Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Airport Chapter Dear Mike : Attached please find copies of an ordinance amending Sec. 21. 76. 080 and 21. 76. 120 of the Zoning Ordinance relating to airport zoning and height regulations . This amendment to the zoning ordinance will bring the height limitation slope ratios for two runway approach zones into compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77. Simply put, this change will allow a steeper approach slope which allows a higher height limit closer to the runway. Basically, the modification would change : A. Sec. 21. 76. 080 - "utility runway visual approach zone" slope ratio from a 40 ' horizontal to 20 ' horizontal while the 1 ' vertical remains the same . B. Sec. 21. 76. 120 - "precision instrument runway approach zone" slope ratio from a 100 ' horizontal to 50 ' horizontal while the 1 ' vertical remains the same. The Planning Commission reviewed this ordinance amendment'at their regular meeting , March 15, 1990. The Commission voted to recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed text modification to Sec. 21 . 76. 080 and Sec. 21. 76. 120 of the Zoning Ordinance which deals with airport zoning and height regulations . Sinc - 1y, Allen •C. Jphnson,• AICP , Planning Director SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AIRPORT AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR ZONING TEXT MODIFICATION OVERVIEW and BACKGROUND This is a request from -.he Lake City t,irport Authority to amend Sec. 21. 76. 080 and Sec. 21 . 76. 120 of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance which relates to airport: zoning and height regulations. ANALYSIS This amendment to the 7orlin e! din6nce yill hrino, the height limitation slope ratios tor t -::o runway approach zones into compliance with Federal Avi ,-Iton W,gulatiens Part 77. Simply put, this change will allow styeper approach slope which allo'is a higher height limit closer in th,, runway. Basically, the modificalion would change: A. Sec. 21 . 76. 000 - "utility runway visual, approach zone" slope ratio from a 40 " horizontal to 20 ' horizontal while the l ' vertical remains the B. Sec. 21. 76. 120 - "presion instruront runway approach zone" slope ratio f ro' n 100 ' hnrizo;ital tn 50 ' horizontal while the 1 ' vertical 17omaiw; tin' • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends th71 1-hf• p 010 Fuj Co=iflion recommend to the City Council approval of: text r.lodification to Sec. 21. 76. 080 and Sec. 21 . 76 . 120 o the Zonitvi r[dinance which c9eals with airport zoning and hei .jhi cegulotinn!-;. Janice M. Jardine March, 1990 EFFECT OF SLOPE RATIO CHANGE HEIGHT LIMITATION • NEW RATIO EXISTING RATIO •:': DISTANCE FROM RUNWAY • LAKE C' BOARD Elaine B.Weis, Chair PALMER A. DEPAULIS, Mayor Curtis E.Ackerlind,Jr. • J.Alan Blodgett • Don A.Mackey I.— LOUIS E. MILLER Eddie P. Mayne • Joseph Rosenblatt -•``=- Director of Airports Patrick A. Shea • Thomas K.Welch On r A January 29, 1990 Alan Hardman, Chairperson - and Salt Lake City Council City and County Building 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Chairperson Hardman and Council Members: Subject: An ordinance amending Section 21.76.080 and 21. 176. 120 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to' airport zoning -and height .(:) regulations. Fiscal Impact: None Discussion: Salt Lake City Code currently defines visual • approach zone slopes in a forty foot horizontal for each one foot vertical ratio. This height limitation slope is not consistent with Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77, which provides for a twenty to one slope ratio. Although runway visual approaches are currently consistent with FAR 77, the requested ordinance change is to have City Code conform with federal requirements. Recommendation: It is respectfully requested that the Council approve the Ordinance amending Section 21.76.080, Salt Lake City Code, and thereby authorizing Mayor signature. Respect : lly submitted, • Ile ouis E. Miller Fnclosure ,. . - - w -al---.:•.. _ w a•r n_.. n^Ht(1 n_la 1 ..f... P:a.. 1 la_L. n un+a SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. 1990 (Airport Zoning and Height Regulations ) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21.76 .120 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO AIRPORT ZONING AND HEIGHT REGULATIONS. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That Section 21 .76 . 120 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to airport zoning and height regulations, be, and the same is hereby amended as follows: 21.76.120 Precision instrument runway approach zone- Height limitation. The height limitation in a precision runway approach zone slopes upward [one hundred] fifty feet horizontally for each foot vertically, beginning at the end of and at the same elevation as the primary surface, and extends to a horizontal distance of ten thousand feet along the extended runway centerline; and thence slopes upward forty feet horizontally for each foot vertically to an additional distance of forty thousand feet along the extended runway centerline . SECTION 2 . This ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990 . CHAIRPERSON (-51 ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor's Action: - Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER RLM:ap -2- (� T MIKE ZUHL SALT'LAKECITY CORPORATION LEE KING INTERIM DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7777 TO: Salt Lake City Council May 8, 1990 Re: Petition No. 400-786-90 submitted by American Stores Properties Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on June 5, 1990 at 6:40 p.m. to discuss Petition No. 400-786-90 submitted by American Stores Properties. The petitioners are requesting that property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West be rezoned from a Residential "R-2" to a Commercial "C-1" zoning classification. Availability of Funds: Not applicable Discussion and Background: The rezoning has been requested to allow Albertsons and Osco to construct an addition on the north side of the existing building approximately 95' x 135' approximately 12,700 square feet. Osco Drug will move into this new addition and Albertsons will expand and renovate the existing grocery and drug store. The remainder of the property will remain in parking and landscaping. The zoning expansion will not change any of the existing land use but will allow the existing businesses to function competitively in the present drug and grocery store market. The Planning Commission has reviewed and approved this Petition with the stipulation that all store entrances and activity shall be oriented toward 900 West Street. The Planning Commission also directed staff to review the final design with respect to loading docks on the north to ensure compliance with city design standards. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's Office has prepared the necessary ordinance and is ready for your action. Submitted by: 7vtilt/47? a/( ICHAEL B. ZUHL nterim Director SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Rezoning property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West pursuant to Petition No. 400-786-90) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21 . 14.020 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING AND FIXING OF BOUNDARIES OF USE DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, in response to the rezoning petition initiated by American Stores Properties, No. 400-786-90, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, has held public hearings before its own body and before the Planning Commission, and has taken into consideration citizen testimony, filing and demographic details of the area and the Master Plan as part of its deliberation. Pursuant to these deliberations, the Council has concluded that the proposed change of zoning for the property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West is appropriate for the development of the community in that area; THEREFORE, The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, hereby adopts the following amendments to the Use District provisions of Title 21 . Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That the Use District Map, as adopted by Section 21 . 14. 020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries of Use Districts, be, and the same hereby is AMENDED to read as follows: Sec. 21. 14.020. Boundaries of Districts - Use District Map Adopted. That the following-described parcel of real property in Salt Lake City, Utah, presently zoned Residential "R-2" is hereby rezoned Commercial "C-1" and the Use District Map is amended accordingly: Beginning at a point on the south line of 200 North 7_, Street, ( formerly First North Street) , said point / 4 ,1b being the Northwest corner of Block 63, Plat "C" , Salt Lake City Survey, and running thence South 165 feet 7V more or less; thence East 455 feet more or less; thence North 9 feet more or less; thence West 45 feet more or less; thence North 156 feet more or less to the south right of way line of 200 North Street; thence West 410 feet more or less to the point of beginning. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE AND CONDITIONS . This ordinance shall not become effective until recorded and the Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed not to record this Ordinance until the Mayor certifies that the following conditions have been met: 1 . The Petitioner shall submit plans for construction in compliance with the conditions required by the Planning Commission in a form suitable for issuance of a building permit. If the foregoing condition is not completed within one year from the date of passage of this Ordinance, the time may be extended for an additional year by certification from the Mayor. If the condition has not been met by the expiration of one year or any extension, this Ordinance shall be null, void and of no effect and shall not be recorded. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990. CHAIRPERSON iJ -2- ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on . Mayor' s Action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER BRB: rc -3- 13 ALLEN C. JOHNSON, AICP SAL E_ IKE CITY'CORPORATION' PALMER DEPAULIS PLANNING DIRECTOR MAYOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7757 May 7, 1990 Mike Zhul, Interim Director Community and Economic Development City and County Building Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re: Petition 400-786 - Rezoning Osco Drug/Albertsons, 900 West & North Temple Dear Mike: Attached please find Petition 400-786 from American Stores Properties requesting Salt Lake City to rezone property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West from Residential R-2 to Commercial C-1 zoning classification. This property is a portion of the parking lot for the shopping center located on the block. It is the intention of Albertsons and Osco to construct an addition on the north side of the existing building approximately 95 " x 135 ' , approximately 12, 700 sq. ft. Osco Drug will move into this new addition and Albertsons will expand and renovate the existing grocery store and drug store. The remainder of the property will remain in parking and landscaping. At their regular meeting, May 3, 1990, the Planning Commission reviewed this petition and voted to recommend to the City Council the expansion of the zoning on this property from Residential R-2 to Commercial C-1, with the stipulation that all store entrances and activity shall be oriented toward 900 West Street. The Planning Commission also directed staff to review the final design with respect to loading docks on the north to ensure compliance with City design standards. Expansion of the zoning will not change any of the existing land use but will allow the existing business to function competitively in the present drug and grocery store market. Page 2 Mike Zhul May 7, 1990 Re: Petition 400-786 - Rezoning Osco Drug/Albertsons, 900 West & North Temple A copy of the planning staff report and supporting documentation is attached for your reference. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact. Janice Jardine or myself. Sincere , Allen . J hnson, AICP Plann ng D rector attachments ACJ: JJ cc: Ms . Lavone Liddle-Camonal , Planning Commission Chairwoman Mr . John Davidson, American Stores Properties, Petitioner SALT LAKF ITY PLANNING COMMISSION S' 7F REPORT AMERICAN STORES i- OPERTIES REQUESTING TO REZIJNE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 200 NORTH AND 900 WEST FROM RESIDENTIAL R-2 TO COMMERCIAL C-1 OVERVIEW Mr . John Davidson representative for American Stores Properties, Inc. owners of Osco Drug Stores is requesting Salt Lake City to rezone property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West from Residential R-2 to Commercial C-1. The proposed use is a building addition of approximately 12, 700 sq. ft. for Osco Drug. Albertsons will expand into the existing drug store space which will double the size of the grocery store. BACKGROUND In 1958 a conditional use was approved by the Board of Adjustment for a parking lot in a Residential R-6 zone to be used in conjunction with a proposed market. Owner of the property at that time was Grand Central. The existing strip commercial center was constructed in 1966 by Albertsons and Skaggs. Surrounding land uses are residential across 900 West and 200 North; residential and commercial to the east; and commercial to the south. The southern 3/4 of the block is zoned Commercial C-1, and the northern 1/4 which includes this property is zoned Residential R-2. The only portion of the block in residential use is the northeast corner . ANALYSIS With the expansion of the zoning as requested the existing shopping center will be expanded and refurbished. The current use of the property to be rezoned is primarily associated with the commercial uses providing parking for customers and employees . The proposed addition and existing structure will require 181 parking stalls . The site plan submitted with the application shows 178 parking stalls just for the Osco area and does not count the parking which will be removed by the proposed addition. Existing parking for Albertsons is not shown on this site plan, however, it appears that there is adequate existing parking for the proposed expansion and existing commercial uses. There is one curb cut on 200 North which provides access into the parking lot for the shopping center . Any openings such as store entrances should be oriented toward the west in order to mitigate any impacts on the residential uses across 200 North. North Temple and 900 West Streets are arterial streets and should have adequate capacity to handle any additional traffic. The Northwest Community Master Plan and Update both identify this area to remain in commercial use. Staff attended th' March 7, 1990 Northwest Community Council meeting and provi d information concerning t i requested expansion of the Commercial C-1 zoning. The proposal received a favorable consensus from the Community Council. RECOMI4ENDATI ON Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the expansion of the zoning on this property from Residential R-2 to Commercial C-1, with the stipulation that all store entrances and activity shall be oriented toward 900 West Street. Expansion of the zoning will not change any of the existing land use but will allow the existing business to function competitively in the present drug and grocery store market. April 25, 1990 Janice M. Jardine 200 NORTH i ff $ (' .0 NORTH ST 2 9y .r !< V' 4 S AFC g a F t F nii i .—. — — E i R: I: _ Nv - l�a�dt {To ; 1 , ,P. S00 `• NORTH ST .. .....i\s\..1\ ``... .� =_ r.: , STATE 21 S . "" i D !+ ,\\• \ FAIN 200 NORTH WI 1. T i _ �\�� \\`�� f. itI I � 111 :! __ A GROUNDSlarik \ ` ww�\ .'• { i _ �' NORTH 'LE o ; vii o �A a�'� p!' A 11 g ` i v, ,�,. 'i - JACRSON AVE_ON,H.Ti wuE„` `i -A _ ,�1 3 1 ! ; a //,, / g-� 02 )F y A . .. :^ ^V ,7 , • /// 57ii ' Ewa . .q °�1 i. / Ate: ° . o 1OR 1. : 6 ; u ST ' ° / soy-* sr 3 ; o T v7. — 7 RN SOUTH V 4 f r a•. g' 6 ;% I ___. NORTH TEMPLE ', APPLICATION FOR ZONING INC AMENDEMENT To be filed in duplicate with the department of Development Services 324 South State Street Suite #201 Filing Fee $100.00 Advertising Fee* $100.00 (*if a public hearing is held) Application is hereby made to the Mayor and City Council of Salt Lake City Utah, to: Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance. By amending Section N/A (Use reverse side for requested text change) Amend the Use District (Zoning) Map. Of Salt Lake City by reclassifying the follo. irig property located at: A . 3587 acre parcel Iodated at the southeast corner of 200 North Street and 900 West Street in Salt Lake City, Utah from a R-2 classification to a C-1 classification (Use reverse side for legal description) ATTACH TO APPLICATION , 1. The reasons why the present zoning is not proper for the area. 2. Changes which have taken place in the area which justify a change in zoning. 3. Description of the proposed use to be made of the property. 4. Other items which justify a change in the existing zoning. 5. Indication of support for rezoning from all affected property owners. 6. Any other information or exhibits which would aid the planning Commission in arriving at a proper reconiuendation. 7. Sidwell Parcel Identification Number. THE ABOVE INFORMATION, IN DETAIL, MIST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION IN ORDER FOR THE PETITION TO BE PROPERLY OONSIDEHLD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. AMERICAN STARES PROPERTIES, INC. Signature of the applicant By:I;!_ t c t(.t .-Gtt /St-tt Address 5201 Amelia Earhart Dr. Salt Lake City, Utah Telephone/Number 801-539-0112zip Code 84116 FILL OUT REVERSE SIDE Attach all exhibits and supporting data to application. Petition No. Date Receipt No. (� j Ci G'5-(- Amount $ - _:; r C 7. — i ' ' ' r CA/ ‘,)C. ) AINO Sidwell Parcel Identification Number. # 08 - 3 5 - 4 5 4 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 0 Legal description of property covered in the application: Beginning at a point on the South line of 200 North Street, said point being the Northwest corner of Block 63, Plat "C" , Salt Lake City Survey, and running thence South 89° 53' 18" East 125.00 feet; thence South 0° 25' 05" West 125.00 feet; thence North 89° 53' 18" West 125.00 feet to the East line of Eighth Vest Street, thence North 0° 25' 05" East 125.00 feet to the point of beginning. Desired Zoning Text ChanfEI N/A Names and mailing addresses of all abutting and/or affected property owner: 1. address 2. address 3. address 4. r address 5. address 6. address 7. address 8. address 9. address 10. address 11. address 12. address 13. address 14. address 15. address Use additional sheet of paper for more names and addresses. ATTACH ALL INFORNIATICN REQUIRED AS OUTLINED ON THE FRONT OF THIS FORM. SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 324 SOUTH STA'1'h STRF}TI Suite #200 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 Ph: 535-7757 1 ) The reasons why the present zoning is not proper for the area. a) Currently the property is surfaced with asphaltic pavement and is part of an active retail strip shopping center. The property is presently utilized by the existing businesses within the shopping center for customer and employee parking as well as an access way for merchandise deliveries to such businesses . 2) Changes which have taken place in the area which justify a change in zoning. a) There have been no significant changes within the shopping center. However, the application for the change in zoning is made with the anticipation of potential shopping center expansion/refurbishment. 3) Description of the proposed use to be made of the property. a) Provided the change in zoning is granted, an expansion of the shopping center is contemplated via the construction of an additional building adjacent the north wall of the existing structures. The remainder of the property in question would continue to be utilized for parking and landscaping. 4) Other items which justify a change in the existing zoning. a) The current use of the property is primarily associated with a commercial usage. Additionally, due to the property' s configuration and location, there appears little likelihood of a future residential use for the same. 5) Indication of support for rezoning from all affected property owners. 6) Any other information or exhibits which would aid the Planning Commission in arriving at a proper recommendation. a) See attached survey. 7) Sidwell Parcel Identification Number . a) 08-35-454- 001-0000 0224W:12/06/89 AMERICAN STORES PROPERTIES,INC. January 9, 1990 C:_21 VIA AIRBORNE Salt Lake City Planning Division 451 South State, Room 406 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Attention: Janice M. Jardine, Community Planner Re: Rezone Application Parcels #08-35- 4 54-001 -0000 and #08- 35- 454 -002-0000 SEC 900 West and 200 North Streets Salt Lake City, Utah Dear Janice: Per our meeting in late November, 1989, you know of American Stores Properties ' desire to change the zoning classification of the above two (2) parcels from R-2 to C-1 . The reclassification is sought as part of a proposed northern expansion of the current shopping center buildings, but the change is sought without the enlargement as a contingency. Enclosed are the following items : 1 ) The completed originals of an Application for Zoning Amendment for each parcel . 2) An attachment which addresses the seven (7) points set forth on the front page of each Application. 3) An updated survey of the two (2) parcels complete with existing building locations , utility placements , boundary locations and dimensions , present zoning division, and a revised legal description. 4) A site plan which illustrates the proposed building expansion, if completed, with the anticipated parking and delivery layout. A question. . . .as the street designations nearest the parcel have changed since the legal descriptions were placed of record, will replacement descriptions need to be utilized or filed? We have those available. 27 447 LAKE CITY, UTAH 841 0421 539I) 19 ?C 1 L (_i/FAi. 'rC)1)5.-7- Salt Lake City Planning Division January 9 , 1990 Page 2 Hopefully, sufficient material has been included to formally begin the rezone application procedure. With this in mind, please review these enclosures and advise me as to what other information is required . Further, please begin the municipal review process for us by scheduling this issue at the earliest hearing. You mentioned during our meeting that one (1 ) or more neighborhood organizations would need to he addressed . I am prepared to meet with you and them when appropriate. I shall call you on Friday, January 12, 1990 to discuss the above. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, . AMERICAN STORES PROPERTIES, INC. ti.L ik) i 1,V 1 k- J o',1n Davison Real Estate Director JD: lc/0248W Attachments JOSEPH R. ANDERSON SALT' " LT CORPOJflON TIMOTHY P. HARPST, P.E. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 333 SOUTH 200 EAST, SUITE 201 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE (801) 535-6630 February 15 , 1990 Janice Jardine Planning & Zoning 4th Floor - City Hall RE: Petition #400-786 American Stores Properties Dear Janice: The Division of Transportation ' s site review comments and recommendations for the property located on the southeast corner of 200 North and 900 West are : 1 ) The curb , gutter and sidewalk improvements along the public frontage are existing as well as improvements for vehicular use on the private development. 2) There seems to be no change in basic use to abutting property owners and the existing development can absorb the additional impact generated by the expansion within the development, 900 West is a minor arterial and can absorb additional traffic generated by the development. 3 ) All utilities and utility easements shall remain as required and approved by the entity concerned . 4 ) All service areas shall conform to on-site staging requirements and be screened to ease any residential impact . Sincerely, ,464)17 Scott R . Vaterlaus Traffic Engineer I BDW/lh cc : Steve Meyer Barry Walsh File ROGER F. CUTLER '�'i a�any % g1 ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS CITY ATTORNEY RAY L. MONTGOMERY STEVEN W. ALLRED LAW DEPARTMENT GREG R. HAWKINS V. SPENDL DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING LA RY BRUCE R. BAIRDVE CHERYL D. LUKE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 505 FRANK M. NAKAMURA CITY PROSECUTOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS TELEPHONE (801) 535-7788 CECELIA M. ESPENOZA GLEN A. COOK FAX (801) 535-7640 JANICE L. FROST MARSHA ATKIN May 3, 1990 RECEIVFr MAY 0 3 1990 Mayor Palmer A. DePaulis MAYOR'S OFFICE 451 South State Street, Room 306 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re: Conveyance for Value Ordinance Dear Mayor: In reviewing a proposed Executive Order concerning donating property to nonprofit charities we noted a conflict with Section 2. 56. 150, Salt Lake City Code. We are submitting this amendment to allow donations of City property to nonprofit charities which meet the criteria. The amendment is in proper form for submission to the Council. Christine Richman has the background information necessary for this change. Very truly ours, GREG . HA K NS Assistant City Attorney GRH:rc Enclosures DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Conveyance for value) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTION A OF TITLE 2, CHAPTER 56, SECTION 150 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, 1988, RELATING TO CONVEYANCE FOR VALUE, AS FOLLOWS: Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That Subsection E of Title 2, Chapter 56, Section 150 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to Conveyance for value, be and the same hereby is, amended as follows: 2.56.150 Conveyance for value. A. Every transfer of inventoried, city-owned, personal property shall be conducted by the chief procurement officer, or under his/her express written authority. All conveyances of such property shall be based upon the highest and best economic return to the city, except that consideration for property conveyed may be based on other public policy factors when conveyed to units of government or other public or quasi-public organizations[ ] , or to nonprofit corporations which meet each of the following criteria: ( 1 ) Have obtained an exemption pursuant to Section 501(C) (3 ) , Internal Revenue Code, from the Internal Revenue Service, (2) Exist primarily to serve the needs of the public, and (3) The property is used for bona fide public purposes with only incidental benefit to the nonprofit entity. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 1990. Published: GRH:rc -2- c"I CDBG MOTIONS PROPOSED BY COUNCILMEMBERS MAY 1 1 , 1990 NOTE: These motions have been prepared, based on previous discussions and requests, for the convenience of Councilmembers. Councilmembers Wayne Horrocks / Roselyn Kirk / Ron Whitehead I move that we express the Council's intent, as a first/second/third priority, to use prior year's slippage to increase funding to Planning's CDBG Administrative program by $ 45,000, and transfer an equivalent general fund appropriation to Building & Housing to fund a housing inspector position and a data entry position. Councilmember Ron Whitehead I move that we express the Council's intent to fund improvements at the Westpointe park, in the amount of (number available Monday) , from prior year's slippage as first/second/third priority. Councilmember Don Hale: I move that we increase funding for the Children's Museum of Utah Renovation by $),e,00Q -- from $30,000 to $46,000; and that we reduce the contingency by / iY000 .L from 129,600 to $113,600. Or ' j I move that we express our intent to increase funding for the Children's Museum of Utah Renovation by $16,000 through the use of prior year's slippage, as a first/second/third priority. j\L) R () J � V 6,rs `e\o) ,KD \\\..y1(1 o LEE KING SALT r 1_4 QIN GO O ION DIRECTOR Alm COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Capital Planning and Programming CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7902 April 23, 1990 TO: Alan G. Hardman, Chairperson Salt Lake City Council RE: RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT REGARDING 16TH YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE SUBSEQUENT INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the attached resolution specifying allocation of 16th Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds and authorizing the Mayor to sign an interlocal cooperation agreement with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) pending receipt of the original contract documents from HUD. FUNDING: Salt Lake City will receive $3,827, 000 in 16th Year CDBG funds and reprogram $265,000 past CDBG slippage for a total of $4, 092, 000 available July 1, 1990 . BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: CDBG funds will be used as approved by the Mayor and City Council. To facilitate the CDBG process, it is requested that the Council sign a resolution adopting the use of the $4, 092, 000 for 16th Year CDBG projects and authorize the Mayor to sign the interlocal cooperation agreement forthcoming from HUD. The 16th Year CDBG application will be submitted to HUD after Council approval . HUD will review the application and send back a grant agreement to be signed and returned by the City before funding becomes available for approved projects . If the Council now authorizes the Mayor to sign this interlocal cooperation agreement pending the receipt of the original contract documents from HUD, it will be possible to begin projects up to two weeks earlier than before. Included with this transmittal is a copy of Salt Lake City Community Development Block Grant Program Funding Recommendations for 16th Year ( 1990-91) which shall serve as Draft Exhibit "A" until the Council adopts its Final Statement of Community Development Objectives of Salt Lake City for the 16th Year Community Development Block Grant Program which will be Exhibit "A" . In addition, a copy of last year' s CDBG grant agreement is also attached which is substantially similar to the agreement we exepct from HUD in early July. At that time the Finance Department will review the contract and assign account numbers for each project and it will be routed through the Attorney' s Office prior to signing by the Mayor. CONTACT PERSON: Bob Gore, 535-7122 . Sincerely, Lee King 1A ,,/�j Director (/V' RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990 APPROPRIATION RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINAL STATEMENT REGARDING 16TH YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ( 1990-1991 ) AND APPROVING INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, Salt Lake City is entitled under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, (42 USC 5301, et. seq. ) and 24 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) , Part 570, to receive Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U. S . Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the 16th Year CDBG Program (1990-91 ) in the sum of $3,827 , 000 and $265, 000 in CDBG carry-over funds, totalling $4 , 092 , 000; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the people of Salt Lake City that the City file an application with HUD for said 16th year CDBG funds in accordance with 24 CFR 570 . 302; and WHEREAS, the public notices, hearings, and other presubmission requirements as set forth in 24 CFR 570 .301 have been accomplished by the City, including but not limited to the following: 1 . A public hearing held Tuesday, May 1, 1990 to consider a tentative list of projects to be funded with the $3,827,000 in 16th Year Community Development Block Grant funds and $265,000 in CDBG carry-over funding, and to obtain the views of citizens regarding the City' s housing and community development needs; and 2 . The publication in a newspaper of general circulation in Salt Lake County, Utah, of the City's proposed Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds; and WHEREAS, the City Council does now meet in public hearing this May 15, 1990 to consider any citizen comments and views received as a result of the aforementioned hearing and publication and to issue the City's Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1 . That the Final Statement of Community Development Objectives of Salt Lake City regarding the 16th Year Community Development Block Grant Program is hereby adopted. These objectives are to accomplish the primary goal of the Community Development Program to revitalize, redevelop, and preserve our urban community by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate income. More specific goals of Salt Lake City are: I . The prevention of slums and blight and the elimination of blighting influences; II . The elimination of conditions which are detrimental to health, safety and public welfare through rehabilitation and related activities; III . The conservation and expansion of housing stock; IV. A more rational utilization of land and other natural resources; and V. The alleviation of physical and economic distress through the stimulation of private investment and community revitalization. In order to meet the goals of the Community Development Program, specific objectives have been identified. These objectives are: a . To concentrate funds through the targeting of neighborhoods and, in addition, specific areas where these improvements will favorably impact several neighborhoods or areas; b. To offer housing rehabilitation programs to owners of single-family and multifamily homes; c . To provide sidewalk, curb and gutter, and street improvements in target neighborhoods and, in addition, specific areas where these improvements will favorably impact several neighborhoods or areas; d. To improve and provide recreational facilities, specifically parks and community centers; e. To stimulate private investment and community revitalization by improving existing and proposed infrastructure through active capital improvement planning and programming; f. To provide comprehensive planning services encouraging better arrangement of residential, commercial, industrial, and recreational activities; and -2- g. To provide limited public service programs for low and moderate income residents for programs where no alternative funding sources are available. Priority will be given to public service programs which compliment physical development activities . 2. That to meet the aforementioned goals and objectives, Salt Lake City hereby adopts as its Final Statement of Projected Use of the aforementioned $3, 827,000 of the 16th Year Community Development Block Grant funds, and the said $265, 000 in CDBG carry-over funds, the allocation to the projects and program areas as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. 3 . That the Mayor, as the official representative of Salt Lake City, is hereby authorized to submit the Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds as set forth herein, together with such additional information and certifications as may be required under 24 CFR 570 . 302 and 24 CFR 570 . 303, to the U.S . Department of Housing and Urban Development in connection with and application for the aforementioned 16th Year CDBG funds . 4 . That the Mayor, as the official representative of Salt Lake City, is hereby authorized to sign and execute the HUD 16th Year CDBG Grant Agreement which shall be in a form substantially similar to the copy attached hereto for the 15th Year, FY 1989-90, funding, subject to final approval as to form of said Grant Agreement by the City Attorney. This authorization shall constitute compliance with all requirements regarding City Council approval of any interlocal cooperation agreement regarding 16th Year CDBG funds . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of May, 1990 . SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: APPROVED A '•:) FORM CITY RECORDER Salt Lake City/. Ar:crnuy's Office Date ..... .�3,(. Q..._.....__........... —.. By " l S' -3- SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 1 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 HOUSING 0001 Redevelopment To bring housing units up to -16 $1,100,000 $750,000 $725,000 Housing Rehab code. Administered through the $700,000-15 RDA in CD target areas or for $700,000-14 income eligible residents city $803,000-13 wide. At least 60% of funds $824,000-12 used for low/mod income. - 0002 HOUSING 0002 ASSIST - Emergency To provide grants to income -16 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 (Home Repair & Com. eligible people for urgently $240,000-15 Design Assistance needed home repairs. $200,000-14 Citywide. $200,000-13 $192,500-12 0003 HOUSING 0003 NITS Revolving Loan To rehab houses, commercial -16 $137,000 $90,000 $90,000 Fund properties, and problem $90,000-15 properties in the NITS West- $75,000-14 side target area. $90,000-13 $90,000-12 0004 HOUSING 0004 Security Lock To provide dead bolt locks and -16 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 Program other security measures for $30,000-15 income eligible residents. $30,000-14 Citywide. $33,000-13 $33,000-12 0005 HOUSING 0005 BHS Operation Paint To provide technical assist- -16 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 Brush ance & paint for low-income $40,000-15 home owners. Eligible areas. $35,000-14 $39,000-13 $39,000-12 0006 HOUSING 0006 BITS Cleaning & To improve deteriorated vacant -16 $20,000 $20,000 $20.000 Securing properties by boarding, trim- $20,000-15 ming vegetation, demolishing $20,000-14 unsafe accessory bldgs. Lien - placed on property. - Eligible areas. - 0007 HOUSING 0007 BITS Boarded/At Risk Repair and maintenance of -16 $75,000 $0 $0 Building Assistance housing and other structures $75,000-15 Program in CDBG target areas. - SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 2 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0008 HOUSING 0008 Heritage Foundation To help finance and encourage -16 $50,000 $30,000 $0 Revlolving Loan Fund the restoration of historical- - ly and architecturally signi- - ficant housing and improve - deteriorated housing within - the City. - 0009 HOUSING 0009 Neighborhood To fund an attorney to file -16 $13,500 $12,000 $7,000 Attorney Program civil suits against property $7,000-15 owners who have abandonded $5,000-14 and deteriorated properties. $9,000-13 Eligible areas. - 0010 HOUSING 0010 Low-Income Housing To provide maintenance and -16 $30,000 $13,000 $13,000 Maintenance - CSC repairs for elderly and $13,000-15 handicapped people who are - income eligible. Citywide. 0011 HOUSING 0011 Mixed Use Housing/ 4500 Sq. Ft. of vacant ware- -16 $129,000 $0 $70,000 Artspace house space into additional $0-15 low/mod income housing within $100,000-11 the Artspace Pierpont Project. $225,000-08 350 W., 250 So. - 0012 HOUSING 0012 Community To support a non-profit -16 $150,000 $150,000 $80,000 Development Corp. housing program & provide $80,000-15 funding to initiate programs - to meet current housing needs. - Eligible areas. - 0013 HOUSING , 0013 Section 108 Loan To pay back the $1.825 million -16 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 Canterbury Apts. Sec. 108 Loan obtained for $300,000-15 acquisition of the Canterbury - Apts. located at 1357 North - Morton Drive. $300,000 per - year for 6 years. - 0014 HOUSING 0014 City Wide Land-Write This program would allow the -16 $150,000 $95,000 $41,000 Down purchase and resale of land in - the City at a discount for - housing projects benefiting - low/mod families. - SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 3 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0015 HOUSING 0015 Federal Grants To provide (as needed) match -16 $100,000 $0 $0 Matching Fund money for other government or - privately funded housing - related projects such as 202 - elderly housing, drug free,and homeless projects. - TOTALS FOR CLASS $2,584,500 $1,790,000 $1,676,000 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 4 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 BLOCK REDESIGN 0001 Markea Ave. Design Planning for improvements in- -16 $10,000 $0 $0 250 So., 800 E. cluding curb, gutter, and $0-15 sidewalk. - 0002 BLOCK REDESIGN 0002 West Court Design Planning and design. -16 $10,000 $0 $0 835 E., 300 So. $0-15 '`003 BLOCK REDESIGN 0003 Laker Court Design Planning and design. -16 $10,000 $0 $0 820 E., 300 So. $0-15 0004 BLOCK REDESIGN 0004 Reeves and Linden Planning and design. -16 $15,000 $0 $0 Block Redesign 760- $0-15 800 E., 340 So. - 0005 BLOCK REDESIGN 0005 Menlo Ave. Design Planning and design. -16 $10,000 $0 $0 840 E., 200 So. $0-15 0006 BLOCK REDESIGN 0006 Chase Ave. Design Planning and design. -16 $10,000 $0 $0 200-300 South & $0-15 1000-1100 East - 0007 BLOCK REDESIGN 0007 Pennsylvania/Iowa To construct street & drain- -16 $263,000 $10,000 $0 Place Const. age improvements. $0-15 940 E., 200-300 So. $10,000-13 TOTALS FOR CLASS $328,000 $10,000 $0 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 5 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 STREETS 0001 W. Cap Hill Street Improvements to consist of -16 $350,000 $250,000 $250,000 Imp. 700-800 No., street pavement, curb and $0-15 300-400 W. gutter. - 0002 STREETS 0002 Euclid Area Street For street improvements to -16 $100,000 $0 $0 Improvements include curbs, gutters, - 100 S. 750 to 900 W. sidewalks, and drainage. - 0003 STREETS 0003 Euclid Area Street For steet improvements to -16 $100,000 $0 $0 Improvements 100 S. include curbs, gutters, - 900 to 1000 West sidewalks and drainage. - 0004 STREETS 0004 Median Island Rehab. To rebuild islands; land- -16 $380,000 $133,000 $133,000 600 E., 600-900 So. scaping, irrigation, curbs, $25,000-15 gutters, and sidewalks on the - adjacent portions of 600 East. - 0005 STREETS 0005 Learned Ave. Improv. Construction to include -16 $90,000 $0 $0 40 N., 1000-1050 W. pavement, sidewalk, curb, $0-15 gutter & storm drain pipe. - 0006 STREETS 0006 East Capitol Street Construction to include curb, -16 $50,000 $0 $0 Improvements gutter, sidewalk and fencing - 150 to 300 North to adjoin the new 4th avenue - stairs. - 0007 STREETS 0007 Berming/Tree Plant- To create a visual barrier -16 $10,000 $0 $0 ing at Center St. by replanting trees/berming.and 600 No. - ' 0008 STREETS 0008 600 W. Improvements Improvements to include curb, -16 $100,000 $0 $0 500 to 600 North gutter, and drainage system. $0-15 Citizens Congress - 0009 STREETS 0009 Sidewalk Curb and Funding for city wide -16 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Gutter Assessment inventory of streets and East $15,000-15 and Inventory Central block redesigns to be - considered for future - construction. - SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 6 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0010 STREETS 0010 Denver St. Imp. To construct improvements to -16 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 Central City TA include pavement, curb, gutter $5,000-15 440 E., 500-600 So. sidewalk, storm drainage, and - water lines. - 0011 STREETS 0011 Alida Place - Improvements to include -16 $16,000 $0 $0 585 Wall St. to 6th pavement of street and weed - North. control. - J012 STREETS 0012 Richards St. Circle To construct a circle at the -16 $55,000 $0 $0 1360 So. Richards St end of Richard St. and plant - , & California Ave. grass on each side of circle. - 0013 STREETS 0013 Lake St. Const. To construct improvements to -16 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 750 E., 800-900 So. include pavement, curb, gutter $8,000-15 E. Central TA storm drainage and water - lines. - 0014 STREETS 0014 Reed Avenue Cleanup To provide yard clean up -16 $5,000 $0 $0 Reed Ave., 400 W. assistance to elderly - home owners. - 0015 STREETS 0015 Glendale Area Street To construct improvements to -16 $325,000 $0 $0 Improvements 900- include pavement, sidewalks, - 1300 So.,900-1700 W. curb, gutter, storm drainage and water lines. TA - )016 STREETS 0016 Handicapped Access Construction of handicapped -16 $50,000 $0 $0 State Street and access. street corners to - , 5th East provide better access to - lift equipped buses. - 0017 STREETS 0017 Target Area Street To design street and/or drain- -16 $20,000 $0 $20,000 Imp/Drainage Design age imp. in target areas for - construction in 17th year - program. - TOTALS FOR CLASS $1,876,000 $608,000 $628,000 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 7 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT MUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 SIDEWALKS 0001 Target Area Replacement of cracked & dis- -16 $500,000 $300,000 $200,000 Replacement placed sidewalk-100% CD funded $200,000-15 in target areas & other CD $200,000-14 eligible areas. $200,000-13 0002 SIDEWALKS 0002 Capitol Hill Neigh- Target area sidewalk for -16 $10,000 $0 $0 borhood Sidewalk Capitol Hill area. - Replacement - TOTALS FOR CLASS $510,000 $300,000 $200,000 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 8 CMG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 STORM DRAINAGE 0001 Guadalupe/Jackson Installation of drainage sys. -16 $150,000 $0 $0 Neighborhood from 500 No. & 600 W. to 1-15. $0-15 Drainage System - 0002 STORM DRAINAGE 0002 Guadalupe/Jackson To cover open ditch on 500 W., -16 $260,000 $0 $0 Ditch Covering 200-530 No. $9,000-15 0003 STORM DRAINAGE 0003 West Capital Hill To construct drainage improve- -16 $120,000 $0 $0 Storm Drainage Imp. ments to tie into proposed - 700 No. storm drain. - 300 W., 700-800 No. - 0004 STORM DRAINAGE 0004 400 East Storm Drain To construct storm drain on -16 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 400 East to alleviate drainage - problem. 400 E., 500-600 So. - TOTALS FOR CLASS $595,000 $65,000 $65,000 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 9 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 PARKS 0001 Jordan Park-Restroom To reconstruct So. restroom & -16 $95,000 $0 $95,000 and Picnic Shelter construct new roof on existing $95,000-15 1000 So., 900 W. picnic shelter. $20,000-14 $300,000-12 $18,000-11 $50,000-10 0002 PARKS 0002 5TH Ave and "C" To expand the recreational -16 $90,000 $0 $0 Street Tennis Imp. potential of City owned - property. - 0003 PARKS 0003 Playground Installa- To install new playground -16 $100,000 $30,825 $0 tion Citywide equipment which meets current - safety standards in various - parks. Citywide. - 0004 PARKS 0004 Fairmont Park To implement current planning -16 $135,000 $0 $135,000 Irrigation of restrooms, auto.irrigation, $10,000-15 2400 So., 900 E. and artesian well improvements $200,000-10 in SE corner of park. $10,000-09 $155,000-06 0005 PARKS 0005 Elks Park Restroom To construct restrooms for -16 $63,600 $11,000 $11.000 and Lighting, 1300 park users and to provide - So. Main security lighting in key areas - of the park. - 0006 PARKS 0006 Redwood Meadows To expand current linear -16 $250,000 $0 $0 Park Expansion park to provide additional - Redwd Rd., 600 No. recreational opportunities. - 0007 PARKS 0007 Athletic Park- Continuation of current proj. -16 $95,000 $0 $0 Phase III to provide improved restrooms $50,000-15 1300 So., 700-800 E. on No. East side of park and $90,000-14 improve ball diamond in No. $10,000-13 East corner. - 0008 PARKS 0008 Urban Forestry Mgmt. To assess, trim, replant, & -16 $50,000 $60,000 $60,000 spray diseased or infested $50,000-15 trees in CD target areas. $50,000-14 $50,000-13 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 10 CDBG 16TI1 YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0009 PARKS 0009 Glendale Mini-Park To conduct a land search and -16 $5,000 $5,000 $0 WS Comm. Council preliminary planning for a $0-15 mini-park in the Glendale - area. - 0010 PARKS 0010 Jordan River Trail To provide a segment of trail -16 $20,000 $0 $0 1000 So., 900 W. over City owned property on - the East side of the river in - the Peace Gardens. - 0011 PARKS 0011 North Gateway To clean up the North Gateway -16 $15,000 $15,000 $10,000 Improvement Projects into the City, construct new $0-15 1000 No., 300 W. stream bed for Warm Springs, - and add a childrens garden. - 0012 PARKS 0012 Vietnamese Peace To construct a garden rep- -16 $10,000 $0 $0 Garden-Jordan Park resenting Vietnamese culture. - 1000 So., 900 W. - 0013 PARKS 0013 Westpointe Park To complete a new neighborhood -16 $250,000 $0 $75,000 N. Redwood Phase II park. $0-15 1900 W., 1400 No. - 0014 PARKS 0014 Sugar House-Fairmont To utilize City owned property -16 $5,000 $5,000 $0 Urban Trail 1200 E., for a class I urban trail. $0-15 1700-2400 So. $5,000-12 0015 PARKS 0015 Wildflower Park To plant wildfowers on State -16 $1,000 $0 $0 500 No., Victory Rd. owned properties by the - , North Gateway to SLC. - 0016 PARKS 0016 Forest Dale Golf To renovate the club house -16 $60,000 $0 $0 Course Club House as an historic building for - 900 E., 2400 So. use as a public facility. - 0017 PARKS 0017 Park Acquisition/ To buy and improve existing -16 $94,500 $15,000 $15,000 Restoration 742 W. land to provide as open space - and So. Temple for Nettie Gregory Comm. Ctr. - SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 11 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0018 PARKS 0018 300 West Median To plant trees down the -16 $10,000 $0 $0 Plantings 400 No. to center of 300 West at - 200 No. appropriate points. - 0019 PARKS 0019 600 North Median To landscape a narrow median -16 $50,000 $0 $0 between 200 & 300 W. with trees down the center of - 600 No. - 0020 PARKS 0020 200 North Median To place a median with grass -16 $50,000 $0 $0 between West Temple and trees in the center of 200 - and 200 W. North. - 0021 PARKS 0021 Nibley Neighborhood To acquire land and create -16 $100,000 $0 $0 Park park. - 2876 So., 900 E. SH - TOTALS FOR CLASS $1,549,100 $141,825 $401.000 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 12 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED RECOMMENDED LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 PUBLIC BUILDINGS 0001 Sunday Anderson For removal of asbestos in -16 $110,000 $0 $0 Senior Citizen ceiling and construction of a - Center new pitched roof. - 900 So., 900 W. - 0002 PUBLIC BUILDINGS 0002 Children's Museum of To renovate 2nd floor for -16 $46,000 $25,000 $30,000 Utah Renovation expansion purposes to include - public workshop & performance - gallery. 840 No., 300 W. - 0003 PUBLIC BUILDINGS 0003 Tenth East Senior To improve existing parking -16 $150,000 $0 $0 Center Parking/ lot & inner block improvements - Tennis Courts Imp. to park tennis courts. - 237 So., 1000 E. - 0004 PUBLIC BUILDINGS 0004 Troy Laundry Multi- To redevelop the old Troy -16 $120,000 $0 $0 Cultural Facility Laundry Complex into a - facility for small, non- - profit, arts, ethnic, media & - advocacy organizations. - 400 So., 600-700 E. - TOTALS FOR CLASS $426,000 $25,000 $30,000 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 13 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 PUBLIC SERVICES 0001 Renovation of YWCA To renovate heating, lighting -16 $29,235 $29,235 $29,000 322 East 300 So. and ventilation systems. $15,000-14 0002 PUBLIC SERVICES 0002 Housing/Financial To hire an additional housing -16 $23,000 $0 $0 Counseling Program counselor to prevent loss of - CAP housing owned by low/mod - income residents. - 0003 PUBLIC SERVICES 0003 Housing Outreach To assist families in -16 $40,000 $35,500 $35,500 Rental Program obtaining safe, affordable $35,500-15 (HORP) housing and increase the $29,000-14 number of low cost apts. $29,000-13 available. $26,500-12 0004 PUBLIC SERVICES 0004 Westside Food Pantry Operational support for this -16 $29,137 $26,000 $26,000 55 No. Redwood Rd. program which provides food & $26,000-15 social services to people in $24,000-14 emergency situations. $24,000-13 $21,700-12 0005 PUBLIC SERVICES 0005 Repair and Upgrade To bring heating, air condi- -16 $75,000 $0 $0 of Friendship Manor tioning and hot water systems - 500 So., 1300 E. up to code. - 0006 PUBLIC SERVICES 0006 Crime Prevention To fund the civilian crime -16 $81,302 $81,000 $81,000 prevention unit to work with $81,000-15 neighborhoods and educate $70,000-14 people on crime prevention $74,000-13 matters. Eligible CD areas. $76,000-12 0007 PUBLIC SERVICES 0007 Building Acquisi- To purchase a building for -16 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 tion for Fellowship the use of AA meetings. - Foundation 1380 So. Richards St. - 0008 PUBLIC SERVICES 0008 Operation New Men/ To fund Traveler's Aid to -16 $100,000 $88,000 $100,000 Family/Womens operate the Men's/Family/ $88,000-15 Shelters Womens shelters. $63,500-14 210 So. Rio Grande. $36,000-13 $31,500-12 $21,000-11 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 14 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0009 PUBLIC SERVICES 0009 Capitol West Boys & To provide a recreation and -16 $32,000 $30,000 $32,000 Girls Club counseling program for high $28,500-15 300 No., 600 W. risk poverty youth in the Guad $28,500-14 /Jackson area. $36,000-12 $21,000-09 $210,000-06 $20,000-04 0010 PUBLIC SERVICES 0010 New Hope Multi- Funding to help rehab this -16 $23,000 $0 $15,000 Cultural Center bldg. used as a community $16,000-15 Rehab. center for Asians. $11,900-14 1102 W. 400 No. $10,000-13 0011 PUBLIC SERVICES 0011 Crossroads Urban To opperate a food pantry to -16 $15,000 $15,000 $5,000 Center Emegency meet needs of the homeless. - Food Pantry Citywide. - 0012 PUBLIC SERVICES 0012 Transition House To acquire property and -16 $150,000 $0 $0 1900 W., No. Temple operate a drug treatment - program. - Application Withdrawn. - 0013 PUBLIC SERVICES 0013 Wasatch Fish and To provide a food source for -16 $22,000 $22,000 $10,000 Garden Project low income people by operating - 1102 W., 400 No. a community fish pond and - garden. - 0014 PUBLIC SERVICES 0014 Literacy Volunteers To make repairs to their -16 $10,000 $0 $0 Building Rehab. facility at 175 No. 600 W. - TOTALS FOR CLASS $729,674 $376,735 $383,500 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 15 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 URBAN AMENITIES 0001 Neighborhood Funding for typing of doc- -16 $2,000 $0 $0 Documentaries umentaries. Citywide. $0-15 0002 URBAN AMENITIES 0002 Neighborhood Self- Up to $1800 grants for neigh- -16 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Help Grants borhood projects; fairs, news- $15,000-15 Eligible Areas letters, cleanup & trees. $25,000-14 0003 URBAN AMENITIES 0003 Bike Path To develop a bike route from -16 $960 $0 $0 Calif. Ave., No. on Emery St. - to 8th So., & East to 10th W. - 0004 URBAN AMENITIES 0004 Bike Path To develop a bicycle route for -16 $3,360 $0 $0 the East side of downtown. - 0005 URBAN AMENITIES 0005 Bike Path To develop a bicycle route on -16 $960 $0 $0 300 E., 800 So. to So. Temple. - 0006 URBAN AMENITIES 0006 W. High Improvement To purchase land in W. High -16 $200,000 $0 $0 Program District for positive impact. $0-15 0007 URBAN AMENITIES 0007 CDC Blocks To clean up, restore, rehab -16 $50,000 $40,000 $0 West High Area and purchase vacant housing. - 0008 URBAN AMENITIES 0008 Living Traditions To support Folk Arts Program. -16 $22,500 $0 $0 Festival (Washington to bring cultural activity and $15,000-15 Square) vitality to the City. - Application Withdrawn. - 0009 URBAN AMENITIES 0009 Capitol Hill Tree To plant trees on 4th West, -16 $15,000 $8,000 $0 Project Victory Road. - TOTALS FOR CLASS $304,780 $58,000 $10,000 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 16 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 0001 Facade Improvement To provide a source of funding -16 $50,000 $0 $0 Demonstration for businesses to improve the - Project fronts of their buildings. - Eligible areas. - 0002 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 0002 Minority Business To provide management and -16 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 Technical Assistance technical assistance to - potential women and minority - businesses. - 0003 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 0003 Twin Years To restore and develop the -16 $15,000 $0 $0 Centennial Project blighted and neglected - No. West quadrant and gateway - of SLC. Ensign Peak. - TOTALS FOR CLASS $73,000 $8,000 $8,000 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 17 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 PLANNING 0001 Development of New 2 year project to revise and -16 $31,250 $31,250 $31,250 Zoning Ordinance rewrite citywide Zoning $0-15 Ordinance. - 0002 PLANNING 0002 National Main St. To hire a consultant to assess -16 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 Urban Center Site and evaluate the State St., - Assessment Sugarhouse, & Glendale/Calif. - Commercial Districts for - revitalization efforts and - make recommendations. - 0003 PLANNING 0003 Salt Lake Housing To conduct a survey relating -16 $38,440 $38,440 $38,500 Condition Survey to housing conditions for - 43,000 residential structures - in Salt Lake City. - 0004 PLANNING 0004 SLACC Staffing For office space & staff to -16 $50,000 $20,000 $13,000 support the Salt Lake Assoc. $50,000-15 of Community Councils. - 0005 PLANNING 0005 Fairmont Master To complete a neighborhood -16 $10,000 $0 $0 Plan level plan for the area 700 E. $0-15 to 1300 E., 2100 S. - I-80. - 0006 PLANNING 0006 Swede Town Hazardous To investigate and report the -16 $8,000 $0 $0 Waste and Air findings of air pollution - Pollution Project and waste problems in Swede - Town. - 0007 PLANNING 0007 Neighborhood Citywide survey of neighbor- -16 $15,000 $15,000 $0 Identification hood boundries to coordinate - Project with 1990 Census. - TOTALS FOR CLASS $164,690 $116,690 $94,750 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 18 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 ADMINISTRATION 0001 Capital Planning Funding for CDBG functions -16 $252,000 $252,000 $252,000 necessary to administer the $230,000-15 grant. $210,000-14 0002 ADMINISTRATION 0002 Finance Funding for CDBG functions -16 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 necessary to administer the $35,000-15 grant. $30,000-14 0003 ADMINISTRATION 0003 Community Affairs Funding for CDBG functions -16 $51,000 $51,000 $51,000 necessary to administer the $45,000-15 grant. $45,000-14 0004 ADMINISTRATION 0004 Attorney Funding for CDBG functions -16 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 necessary to administer the $42,000-15 grant. $42,000-14 0005 ADMINISTRATION 0005 Planning Funding for CDBG functions -16 $55,000 $55,000 $55,000 necessary to administer the $55,000-15 grant. $55,000-14 0006 ADMINISTRATION 0006 Environmental Funding for CDBG functions -16 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Assessments necessary to administer the $7,500-15 grant. $7,500-14 0007 ADMINISTRATION 0007 City (lousing Funding for CDBG functions -16 $14,595 $14,500 $14,500 Coordination necessary to administer the - grant. - TOTALS FOR CLASS $462,595 $462,500 $462,500 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 19 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 PERCENT FOR ART 0001 Jordan Park To provide decorative pavement -16 $0 $950 railings, sculptures, foun- - tains and other works of art - for certain CDBG funded - Capital Improvement Projects. - 0002 PERCENT FOR ART 0002 Fairmont Park Same as above. -16 $0 $1,350 0003 PERCENT FOR ART 0003 Elks Park Same as above. -16 $0 $100 , 0004 PERCENT FOR ART 0004 Westpointe Park Same as above. -16 $0 $750 0005 PERCENT FOR ART 0005 Childrens Museum Same as above. -16 $250 $500 TOTALS FOR CLASS $250 $3,650 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Date 04/09/90 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAGE 20 CDBG 16TH YEAR (1990-91) PROJECT NUM TITLE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUESTED ****************** RECOMMENDED ****************** LOG NUM Amount Yr CDAC MAYOR COUNCIL 0001 CONTINGENCY 0001 Contingency The amount set aside to cover -16 $175,000 $130,000 $129,600 anticipated cost overruns or $139,250-15 emergency needs. $182,200-14 TOTALS FOR CLASS $175,000 $130,000 $129,600 TOTALS FOR REPORT $9,778,339 $4,092,000 $4,092,000 Funding Approval U.S. Department of Housing APPROVED and Urban Development Under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-383) as Amended Community Ceveloomen; 1989 1 r Fiecx Grant Program AUG 9 I-00515R I. Name of Grantee 2. Grunt No. CITY RECORDER Salt Lake City, Utah I B-89-MC-49-0004 2. Grantees Aaareu i tncruee Steer C.:. Co...n.r S:ate ano Z:o Coe 4. Dale at_uomuton 451 South State Street, Room 404 6/14/89 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 5. Cale otNUC Receipt otsuomun 6/26/89 �{ t Date Grantee Noltlie0 l:1.�� 2 1585 SSias.,„ci o•ocram tear 7/1/89 6.Yd Gnome,Funning Aooro•at _Aamencment.Aemenament no. All section references below are to the Housing ano Community Development Act of 1974.as amenoec.unless otherwise incicated. 7_ Category of Community Dere,00menl Bloc.Grant for This Funamg Action C.:ec,c tile, aXZ:1 _nt:::ernent (Sec. 1 6(C. b. L ;cministerec Srnail r :ies ;Sec. ICE) _. :B` a. E Sec rotary s Discretionary •Sec. 107) 3. Amount of Community Dereiooment Bloc.Grant F' FY =, 1989 a. . ,,. 02BG runts .... _n.:. Reservec far :s .'rant__ S _ S _ 3 ,Q4-/ ,000 C. r„ a. ,,..SG Posts Now 8e: Accrovec Tar.^is Grantee s s _ 3,947,000 c. AMC::::Cf Reser✓atior rc ceC:ancellec IL:ne 9a minus c.,, 5 C _ -0- HUD ACCOUNTING USE ONLY 3� ,coc_a.__,.7 L.-. I.: I 1 . i I-"E-1 ICCC:2 _ 1 =C.,EC- r,-YES. - S I 11 , 31 I I l 1 r 7-=— 1 I 1111 1 V 1 l i 1 Il i t I *01 l I L 1 i I , ! 1 7I018121 l I i ! i , 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 r1 . 9 12 13 1 6 18 23 30 35 I C;.7�•3 IArdOUN7 I 1 '''''''.---'.E.,..re 1 1 I-'.1C'u _ 1 1 SCH - ,ic I 1 ! 1 i Ili Lo' 1 11 'l • ' I 11 8 46 64 60 61 65 70 74 79 9. Dtatnbution of Community Daretooment Bloc.Grant :Ty . i=v 1989 a. Grant amount withneid for payment of princ(pai ane Interest -0- on loans guarantees pursuant to Sec. 108 5 S S b. Grant amount deducted by HUD to settle outstanding Urban -0- Renewal Loans (Sec. 112(a((1)) S S c. Sum of lines 9a. ana 9b 5 5 S -O d. Amount of CDBG Funds available for disbursement 5 5 S 3,947,000 (Line?b minus 9c1 10. Amount or Surotu■Urban Reneol Funo■nsproreo and balenc.arattaofe(Sec.112(b)) a. Amount of surplus U.R. Funas reserves far tnis grantee S N/A b. Amount of surplus U.R. Funas now oeing approved S N/A c. Balance of surDlu_s U.R. Funds available for future use (Line 10a minus 1Cbi S N/A .revnous Ef moons ore Cosoiete HUD•7082 112.831 7d r.FR 57f1 HUD ACCOUNTING USE ONLY 3A TCrl TAC J POGAAM Y IA PEG J AREA I OocuMEN T NC " PAW EC'NumeER — s 115131 I I 1 I 1J7161 I I 7 0 8 2 • Li I 1 4 9 12 13 14 16 18 23 30 35 I zA TEOCRI AMOUNT' CF;ECTIVE OATS �l AMOUNT 2 SCItiECULE NO 38 41 45 50 54 60 61 65 70 74 79 11. )l allmum amount of loan guarantee commitment amiable and amount now Cuing aptncnon. a. Grantee's latest entitlement amount—S x 3 S N/A b. Principal amount of outstanding loans pursuant to Section 108 • S N/A c. Amount of outstanding loan guarantee commitments approved pursuant to Section 108 S N/A d. Maximum amount of loan guarantee commitment available (Line 1 1 a minus 11b.and 11c) S N/A e. Amount of loan guarantee commitment now being approved S N/A 12 RaaeWent of loan guaranta.,Chece apDlreaal.Coo) a. ❑ Grantee identified in block No. 1 b• 0 Public Agency designated to receive loan guarantee(Name and address) N/A 13. 5o.aat eonaltlona iC`ece.+co,,c-1o01(M+, a. ❑ Not applicable b XIE Attached U.S.D rtment of Housing and Urban Development BY Director, Office of CPD Title g • 91411 "8/ Date 13 . (b) Soecial condt: ors E.O. 122772 - SPECIAL CONTRACT CON:ION 1 . Notwithstanding any provision of the Grant Acreement, no funds provided under this agreement may be oblicated or expended for the planning or construction of water or sewer facilities until receipt of written notification from HUO of the release of funds on completion cf the review procedures required under the Executive Order (E.U. ) 12372, lrteroovernmenta i Review of Federal Prc'araris, a`id rUD's implementing regulations at 24 C. F.R. Part 52. The recipient shall also complete the review procedures required under E.C. 12372 and 2c- C. F.F. Part 52 and receive Kritten notification from BUD of the release_ of funds before oolicatinc or expenclnc any ft:ncs provided under ...is 3 greener: fir any new or rev sec activity for the planning or construction of water or sewer facilities net previously reviewed under E.O. 12372 and implementing regulations. Grant Agreement and Loan U.S.Department of Housing /►� and Urban Development a Guarantee Acceptance Provisions r Community Cevelocrrent Biocx Grant ?'cgram Grant Agreement This Grant Agreement is mace cv anc between the Department of Housing anc Urban Development (HUD) and Salt 1 kP City, Utah (the Grantee) pursuant to the authority of Title I of the Housing and Community Devel- opment Act of 1974(Public Law 93-3831, as amended. The Grantee s submissions for Title I assistance and the HUD regulations at 24 CFR Part 570(as now in effect and as may be amended from time to time),which are incorporated by reference.together with the HUD Funding Approval Form 7082 and any special conditions.which are hereto attached.constitute part of the Agreement. In reliance upon and in consideration of the mutual representations and obligations hereunder.HUD and the Grantee agree as follows: Subject to the provisions of this Grant Agreement. HUD will make the funding assistance for Fiscal Year 19 89 specified in the attached HUD Funding Approval Form 7082 available to the Grantee upon execution of the Agreement by the parties.The obligation and utilization of the funding assistance provided is subject to the requirements of the regulations and any special conditions set forth in the HUD Funding Approval Form 7082. including the requirement for a release of funds by HUD under the Environmental Review Procedures at 24 CFR Part 58 for any activities requiring such release. The Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable requirements of Titles II and Ill of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970(42 U.S.C. 4601) as specified in regulations issued by the Secretary and published in 24 CFR Part 42. The Grantee further agrees to assume all of the responsibilities for environmental review.decision making and actions,as specified and required in regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to section 104(f) of the Act and published in 24 CFR Part 58. The Grantee further agrees to accent resoonsibility for adherence to the Agreement by subrecipient entities to which it makes funding assistance r,ereuncer available U.S. D partrnent of Housing anc Uroan Development • • 6y Director, Office of CPD Title �� — Date The Grantee v iff44,4,44 • it• 6 . :<, nBy 1,1 a � PAL MR A nF PA::L!s MAYOR e• '• •Title AUG 91989 'dRajS;;�'` Date •��,• Loan Guarantee Acceptance Provisions (Use only for Section 108 Loan Guarantee Assistance to designated public agency) N/A The public agency hereby accepts the Grant Agreement executed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development on with respect to grant number .as Grantee designated to receive loan guarantee assistance.and agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement applicable regulations.and other requirement of HUD now or hereafter in effect. pertaining to the assistance provided it Name of Public Agency/Grantee Signature of Authorized Official Title Title LINDA HAMILTON $2 ' � t��ii�� 60 ,r PALMER DEPAULIS DIRECTOR OF FINANCE MAYOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT Policy and Budget Division 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 248 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE (801) 535-7810 May 3, 1990 TO: Salt Lake City Council RE: BUDGET AMENDMENT #6 - PUBLIC HEARING Recommendation: That on May 15, 1990 the City Council set a date to hold a public hearing on June 5, 1990 to discuss Budget Amendment #6. Availability of Funds: Not applicable. Discussion and Background: Due to scheduling difficulties, it is necessary to set the date for the hearing much earlier than usual. Therefore, all work necessary for the amendment packets has not been finalized. The Council Executive Director has indicated, however, that it would be acceptable to transmit the amendment packets to the Council office on May 24, 1990, one week prior to the scheduled public hearing date. Additionally, a briefing session will be held with the Council on May 29 to discuss the amendment. Legislative Action: The City Attorney' s office has prepared the necessary ordinance and it is included with this transmittal. Submitted by: Linda Hamilton Director of Finance LH/SF: lc Enclosure SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. OF 1990 (Amending the Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 36 OF 1989 ADOPTING THE BUDGET OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1989 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1990 . PREAMBLE On June 13, 1989 , the Salt Lake City Council (the "City Council" ) adopted the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 and ending June 30 , 1990, in accordance with the requirements of Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah. The Director of Finance, acting as the City' s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public . The City Council fixed a time and place for a public hearing to be held on June 5, 1990 to consider the attached proposed amendments to the budget and ordered notice thereof be published as required by law. Notice of said public hearing to consider the amendments to said budget was duly published and a public hearing to consider the attached amendments to said budget was held on June 5, 1990 in accordance with said notice at which hearing all interested parties for and against the budget amendment proposals were heard and all comments were duly considered by the City Council. All conditions precedent to amend said budget have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah as adopted by Salt Lake City Ordinance 36 of 1989 . SECTION 2 . Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 and ending June 30, 1990, in accordance with requirements of Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated. SECTION 3 . Certification to Utah State Auditor. The Director of the City' s Finance Department, acting as the City' s Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments with the Utah State Auditor. SECTION 4 . Filing of Copies of the Budget Amendments . The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City -2- Recorder, which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 5 . Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990 . SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Approved by the Mayor this day of , 1990 . MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Le -City Attomey's Office Date _ '•- CITY RECORDER By 11` FMN:cc (SEAL) Bill No. of 1990 Published -3- E3 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JOSEPH R. ANDERSON 324 SOUTH STATE STREET PALMER DEPAULIS PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 MAYOR 535.7775 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 24, 1990 REFERENCE: 1990 Central Business District Street Lighting & Beautification S. I.D. Project No. 38-864-1 RECOMMENDATION: The City Council adopts a resolution to create the District. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: Redevelopment Agency funds and property owner assessments through the Special Improvement District. DISCUSSION: This district will provide for installation of new sidewalk with brick pavers, tree planters, irrigation and elec- trical system, street lights and the rehabilitation or abandon- ment of sidewalk vaults. It should be noted a waiver and consent agreement has been entered into by the City to add the Crossroads parking structure on West Temple (Deseret Title Holding Corporation) to the district. This will facilitate the extension of the beautification improvements in this area. Construction will begin in June 1990 with completion by October 1990, if construction funds are made available. Attached are drawings showing the areas to be reconstructed, an information sheet, and a summary of protests against the district. CONTACT PERSON: Daniel C. Noziska, P.E . - Project Manager �Q,� SUBMITTED BY: Joseph R. Anderson - Director of Public Works d� JRA:DCN:pp Attachments cc: Max G. Peterson Daniel C . Noziska Richard Fox Vault INFORMATION SHEET 1990 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT BEAUTIFICATION AND STREET LIGHTING SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 38-864-1 DISCUSSION: The 1990 CBD Beautification and Street Lighting Special Improvement District involves South Temple/Main Street to 300 West; 300 South/West Temple to 200 West; 400 South/State Street - Main Street (north side) ; State Street/300 South - 400 South (west side) ; and 100 South Median/ State Street to Main Street. The improvements for the District include the removal and reconstruc- tion of curb, gutter , sidewalks with brick pavers, driveways and appurtenances ; the removal of illegal or nonstandard driveways; the construction of minor drainage facilities ; the construction of tree planters , placement of soil and trees ; the installation of irrigation and electrical systems ; street lighting ; property drains ; the abandon- ment or rebuilding of sidewalk vaults ; and other miscellaneous work which is necessary to complete the above improvements. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: Funds for the project will come from the Redevelopment Agency and property owner assessments through the Special Improvement District. PRELIMINARY ESTIMATED COSTS: Property Owner Portion $ 860, 950 Redevelopment Agency Portion 790, 000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $1,650, 950 SUMMARY OF PROTESTS CBD-SID 38-864-1 Property Owner 1. Emmett S. Heinrich 279 West South Temple Rate Estimated Front Estimated No Description Unit Cost Footage Total Cost 7 So . Temple Street Lighting $67. 50/LF 115. 5 LF $7, 796. 25 including new poles, con- duit and vaults 9 Operation-maintenance of $ 5. 00/LF 115. 5 LF $ 577 . 50 street lighting for first year TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT $8,373.75 Protest Rate = Value of Work for Protesting Property Owners Total of Property Owner Assessments Protest Rate = $8, 373. 75 = 1. 02% $819, 985. 54 BD6193 (PF) Salt Lake City, Utah May 15, 1990 A regular meeting of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, was held on Tuesday, May 15, 1990, at the hour of 6: 00 p.m. at the offices of the City Council at 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah at which meeting there were present and answering to roll call the following members who constituted a quorum: Alan Hardman Chair Nancy Pace Vice Chair Roselyn N. Kirk Councilmember L. Wayne Horrocks Councilmember Thomas M. Godfrey Councilmember Ronald Whitehead Councilmember Don C. Hale Councilmember Also present: Palmer A. DePaulis Mayor Roger Cutler City Attorney Kathryn Marshall City Recorder Absent: None Thereupon the following proceedings, among others, were duly had and taken: It was noted that notice was published concerning the creation of Salt Lake City, Utah Special Improvement District No. 38-864 (the "District" ) . A public hearing was held on April 17, 1990 at which there was one oral protest. Mr. Emmett Heinrick of 279 West South Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah spoke in opposition to the proposed improvements. His written protest concerning the proposed District and the improvements to be constructed was the only protest received at the office of the City Recorder. The City Engineer has determined that the percentage of written protests for the District, as described originally in the Notice of Intention was approximately 1 . 02% of the total to be assessed. A property owner has requested that a parcel of property facing on West Temple between First South and South Temple Streets be added to the District. By signing a Waiver and Consent the property owner has waived right to notification, right to protest and any other rights in connection with creation of the District and has requested and consented to the inclusion of the West Temple facing portion of its property in the District. It is the recommendation of the City Engineer that the additional property be included in the District and that the District be created. Having considered the protest and the recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilmember introduced a resolution to create the District and Councilmember BD6193 (Pr) 2 moved its adoption. Councilmember seconded the motion to adopt the Resolution. The Resolution was thereupon put to a vote and unanimously adopted on the following recorded vote: YEA: NAY: The resolution reads as follows: BD6193 (PF) 3 RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990 A RESOLUTION TO CREATE SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, NO. 38-864, AS DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF INTENTION CONCERNING THE DISTRICT PLUS AN ADDITIONAL SECTION OF PROPERTY ADDED TO THE DISTRICT IN RELIANCE UPON A WAIVER AND CONSENT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY OFFICIALS TO PROCEED TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS AS SET FORTH IN THE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CREATE THE DISTRICT. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah: Section 1 . It will be in the best interest of Salt Lake City (the "City" ) to construct the improvements identified and described in the Notice of Intention for the Salt Lake City, Utah Special Improvement District, No. 38-864 (the "District" ) . Section 2 . The City Council has heretofore considered the only written protest on file with the City Recorder. A hearing was held to give each and every person who wished to be heard an opportunity to protest against the creation of the District or the construction of any of the improvements therein. The author of the written protest was the only person to object verbally against the proposed District. Section 3 . Improvements proposed and described in the Notice of Intention are hereby authorized and the District is hereby created to construct these improvements. Section 4. The area included within the District is described in the Notice of Intention and the additional BD6193 (PP) 4 property described in the Waiver and Consent. The legal description or tax identification numbers of the included properties are more fully set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Section 5 . As required by law, the City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to file within five days from the date hereof a copy of the Notice of Intention and this Resolution creating the District as finally approved, together with a list of properties proposed to be assessed, described by tax identification number or legal description in the Salt Lake County Recorder' s office. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 15th day of May, 1990. Chair ATTEST: City Recorder ( S E A L ) BD6193 (L'F) 5 After conduct of other business not pertinent to the above, on motion duly made, seconded and carried, the meeting was adjourned. Chair ATTEST: City Recorder ( S E A L ) BD6199 (PP) 6 PRESENTATION TO THE MAYOR The foregoing resolution was presented to the Mayor for his approval or disapproval on the 15th day of May, 1990. Chair MAYOR' S APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this 15th day of May, 1990. Mayor BD6193 (PE) 7 STATE OF UTAH ) ss COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I , Kathryn Marshall, the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, do hereby certify as follows: That the foregoing pages constitute a full, true and correct copy of the record of the proceedings of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, at its regular meeting held on May 15, 1990, insofar as said proceedings relate to the creation of Salt Lake City, Utah Special Improvement District, No. 38-864 as the same appears of record in my office. I personally attended said meeting and the proceedings were in fact held as specified in said minutes. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of said City as of this 15th day of May, 1990. City Recorder ( S E A L ) B1)6193 (PF) 8 STATE OF UTAH ) : ss. CERTIFICATE OF FILING COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I , Kathryn Marshall, the. duly qualified and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, do hereby certify that on the day of May, 1990, pursuant to Section 10-16-7, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, a copy of the Notice of Intention dated March 13, 1990 and the Resolution dated May 15, 1990 creating Salt Lake City, Utah Special Improvement District, No. 38-864 (the "District" ) as finally approved, together with a list of properties proposed to be assessed described by tax identification number or legal description, was filed in the Salt Lake County Recorder' s Office within five (5) days of the date of Creation of the District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said Municipality this day of May, 1990. City Recorder ( S E A L) ED6193 (Pr) 9 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW I , Kathryn Marshall, the undersigned City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the "City" ) , do hereby certify, according to the records of the City in my official possession, and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the requirements of Section 52-4-6(2 ) , Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, I gave not less than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time and place of the May 15, 1990 public meeting held by the City as follows: (a) By causing a Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule "A" , to be posted at the City' s principal offices at the City and County Building, Salt Lake City, Utah on May _ , 1990, at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting, said Notice having continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection until the completion of the meeting; and (b) By causing a copy of such Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule "A" , to be delivered to the Deseret News on May , 1990, at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting. 8D6193 (PE) 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature this 15th day of May, 1990. City Recorder ( S E A L ) BD6193 (PF) 11 SCHEDULE "A" NOTICE OF MEETING BD6193 (PE) 12 EXHIBIT "A" TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF PROPERTIES TO BE ASSESSED [A complete list consisting of pages of Tax I .D. numbers and property descriptions is available for inspection at the Salt Lake City Recorder's and the City Engineer' s office. ] BD6193 (Pr) 13