05/26/1994 - Minutes Minutes of the Salt Lake Valley Solid Waste Management Council held Thursday, May 26, 1994
at 11:00 A.M. in the Conference Room, Administration Building, Salt Lake Valley Solid Waste
Management Facility, 6030 West 1300 South, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Those present: Brad Stewart Salt Lake City
Kent Miner Salt Lake City/Co. Health Dept.
Dr. Ryan Dupont Utah State University
Russell Willardson COG/West Valley City
Others in attendance:
Daniel L. Bauer Solid Waste Disposal
Paul Maughan Salt Lake Co. Attorney
Bud Stanford Solid Waste Disposal
Les Hirschi E.T. Technologies
Jacque Delatorre Utah Recycling
Ralph Bohn Utah DEQ
Ed Rufener South Salt Lake City
Romney M. Stewart Solid Waste Disposal
Pam Derbidge Secretary
1. Approval of Minutes (February 18, 1994)
Russell Willardson made a motion to approve the minutes of the February 18, 1994
meeting as prepared; Dr. Ryan Dupont seconded the motion. The motion passed
unanimously.
2. Approval of Midyear Budget Adjustment Request
Romney Stewart briefly reviewed the highlights of the midyear budget adjustments for
those present. He noted that there were two areas in the request relating to revenue.
The interest received on designated and undesignated funds is ahead of last year;
therefore, a revenue increase of $130,00 is being requested. The Landfill revenue for
the first four months of 1994 was higher than this same period in 1993 because of an
increase of 8000 ton in chargeable waste. It is projected for the remainder of the year
that tonnage will increase the revenue by $200,00. Revenue adjustment will exceed
expenditure adjustments by $55,500.
The major mid year budget adjustments will be for the following items: an Ecology
Specialist; over time to cover time and a half for holidays; the incremental cost for
biodegradable bags for Salt Lake City's leaf collection program; increased fuel costs;
adjustments for depreciation, additional capital purchases to include a composting site
building, testing equipment for freon from appliances, radiation detection equipment, and
a third inbound scale building to cover peak disposal periods.
Kent Miner made a motion to accept the mid year budget adjustments outlined (copy
attached); the motion was seconded by Ryan Dupont. The motion passed unanimously.
3. Approval of Fees for Composting/Mulch
Romney Stewart noted there has been a greater demand for compost/mulch than
anticipated. A proposal has been made to charge a nominal fee ($5.00 per pickup truck)
for the material for residents wishing to load their own vehicles. The cost is $10.00 per
pickup if the material is loaded by the Landfill for private citizens; commercial vehicles
or very large trucks are charged $15.00 per ton. At some point in the near future, the
fees will be increased to cover the cost of processing the material.
Russell Willardson made a motion to approve the fees as outlined for the compost/mulch
material; Dr. Ryan Dupont seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Romney Stewart noted that the Landfill is the largest volume compost/mulch processor
in the Rocky Mountain region. Private citizens are encouraged to separate their green
waste for use in the project; there are also fee incentives to encourage clean loads of
yard waste.
4. Report on Bag-A-Thon - Chris Smart
Christ Smart, Recycling Information Office, distributed a preliminary report on the Bag-
A-Thon. (Copy attached) Approximately 17,000 volunteers gathered 70,000 pounds +
of litter during the Bag-A-Thon campaign during the month of April and the first 10 days
in May. Cleanups of Decker Lake and the Jordan River Parkway areas were successful.
Jan Teasdale and Bonnie Burks organized the elementary schools for litter clean up
campaigns.
Recycled material totals were down for the 1994 campaign. The individual responsible
for organizing the Bag-A-Thon left the Recycling Information Office just as the month
long Bag-A-Thon was to begin. The remaining staff had to complete the program. This
year the litter cleanup campaigns were organized and carried out with minimal assistance
from the Recycling Information Office.
Chris recommended that participation in future Bag-A-Thons should emphasize recycling
efforts rather than litter cleanup. He also recommended that schools and municipalities
organize their own clean up campaigns. Russell Willardson commented that he felt it
would be better to focus on recycling rather than litter cleanup. The Recycling
Information Office would do better in coordinating the municipalities in a recycling
campaign. Chris also suggested coordinating with the State "Take Pride in Utah" clean
up day next year.
The next meeting is tentatively scheduled for June 30, 1994 at 11:00 A.M. at the Landfill.
Meeting adjourned at 11:30 A.M. mins94.may
2
24-May-94 F:ADM\USR\LEM\BUDGET\JUNDOC94 PAGE 6
SALT LAKE COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY OF 1994 JUNE BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS
FUND BALANCE NET ASSET
EXPENDITURE REVENUE TRANSFER FUND BALANCE PURCHASES/ NET CASH
FUND/ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT IN/(OUT) CHANGE CHANGES CHANGE
540 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FUND
540-400-4750 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
INTEREST REVENUE (PAGE ??) $0 $130,000 $0 $130,000 $0 $130,000
LANDFILL CHARGES (PAGE ??) $0 $200,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $200,000
RECYCLING RESEARCH & PLANNING
SPECIALIST (PAGE ??) $6,000 $0 $0 ( $6,000) $0 ($6,000)
ECOLOGY SPECIALIST (PAGE ??) $11,974 $0 $0 ( $11,974) $0 ($11,974)
TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR SOIL
REGENERATION AND STOCKPILING
(PAGE ??) $13,500 $0 $0 ($13,500) $0 ($13,500)
OVERTIME (PAGE ??) $10,000 $0 $0 ($10,000) $0 ($10,000)
BIODEGRADABLE LEAF BAGS (PAGE ??) $50,000 $0 $0 ($50,000) $0 ($50,000)
FUEL PURCHASES (PAGE ??) $72,052 $0 $0 ($72,052) $0 ($72,052)
FUEL FOR COMPOSTING EQUIPMENT
(PAGE ??) $34,000 $0 $0 ($34,000) $0 ($34,000)
CONTRACTED LABOR FOR SPOTTERS
(PAGE ??) $30,000 $0 $0 ($30,000) $0 ($30,000)
DEPRECIATION (PAGE ??) $60,000 $0 $0 ($60,000) ($60,000) $0
CLOSURE & POSTCLOSURE CARE COSTS
--GASH STATEMENT 18 (PAGE 7?) $360,000 $0 $360,000 $0 $0 $0
CAPITAL PURCHASES (PAGE ??) $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,000 ($47,000)
TOTAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL $647,526 $330,000 $360,000 $42,474 ($13,000) $55,474
TOTAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FUND $647,526 $330,000 $360,000 $42,474 ($13,000) $55,474
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FUND-540-400-4750
Interest Revenue
A review of the current interest revenue projection indicates
that the present 1994 projection of $250,000 could be increased. The
Solid Waste Disposal Fund cash balance has increased because of growth
in the restricted cash for the Fund. We estimate that the actual
interest earnings will be $380,000. The actual 1993 interest revenue
was $281,809. The actual 1994 interest revenue posted to the Solid
Waste Disposal Fund to date is higher than in 1993. The Solid Waste
Disposal Division recommends that the revenue line item for interest
(540-400-4750-3411) be increased by $130,000.
Landfill Charges
The year to date tonnage through April, 1994 has increased over
the same period in 1993. Should this amount of increase continue
throughout the rest of 1994, the Landfill could receive an additional
$300,000 in revenue. The accounts receivable totals have also
increased and are not reflected the present financial figures for
1994. The Solid Waste Disposal Division recommends that revenue line
item 540-400-4750-3786 (Landfill Charges) be increased by $200,000 to
reflect a 1% growth over 1993.
Royalty revenue from the soil regeneration project is now
expected to be under the budget estimate but should be offset by sales
revenue from metal, carpet pad, and compost by years end which is
expected to exceed budgeted amounts.
Recycling Research & Planning Specialist
The Board of County Commissioners, at its meeting held February
14, 1994, approved the increase of a part time allocation for the
Recycling Research and Planning Specialist to a full time allocation
for an additional $6,000. This position is to provide assistance with
media and public relations. The Public Works Department requests that
line item 540-400-4750-1130 (Permanent & Provisional) be increased as
a technical adjustment.
Ecology Specialist
A new Ecology Specialist 12/13 allocation is requested. A full
time employee dedicated to bird control at the tipping face will
minimize distractions for operators and annoyances to patrons and
neighbors. This individual will also be involved in monitoring the
22
relationships of animals and plants with various environments at the
Landfill facility. The Solid Waste Disposal Division respectfully
requests the following line item adjustments to fund a new Ecology
Specialist employee allocation starting July 1 1994 :
INCREASE/
(DECREASE)
EXPENDITURES
Permanent & Provisional (1130) $ 8 , 244
244
Social Security Taxes (1210) 631
Retirement Contributions (1230) 692
Sup Retirement 401K (1235) 247
Insurance (1240) 2 , 160
Total Expenditure Request $ 11, 974
Temporary Assistance For Soil Regeneration And Stockpiling
Two Temporary Heavy Equipment Operator 17 allocations are
requested for a period of five months. These allocations will be used
to move E. T. Technologies, Inc regenerated soil and to provide
stockpiled soil to the project with scrapers. Existing operators are
already committed to tipping face, unloading station, compost and
daily cover activities. The Solid Waste Disposal Division
respectfully requests that $13, 500 be added to line item 540-400-4750-
1160 (Temporary) for soil regeneration and stockpiling assistance.
Overtime
The full impact of the policy change to pay time and a half for
holiday work is now being realized. Also, frequent requests by Salt
Lake City, Salt Lake County, and other patrons to remain open after
closing time due to weather, breakdowns, or other delays contributes
to this expenditure. The massive spring cleanup and increases in
government sponsored cleanup programs have further increased over time
in April and May. The Solid Waste Disposal Division respectfully
requests that $10, 000 be added to line item 540-400-4750-1180
(Overtime) .
Biodegradable Leaf Bags
Salt Lake City Waste Management has requested that consideration
be given to providing $50, 000 towards the purchase of biodegradable
leaf bags. Currently plastic bags are used for their fall leaf
collection program and it is very expensive and time consuming to
remove the bags at our compost site. This contribution will further
23
benefit the compost program at the Landfill by ensuring removal of
plastic contaminants from compost products. The Solid Waste Disposal
Division respectfully requests that $50,000 be added to line item 540-
400-4750-6560 (Special Projects) •to aid the compost program.
Fuel Purchases
The Fleet Management Division has recommended adjustments for
County fuel and oil purchase's presently budgeted for 1994. This
recommendation is described in detail in the Fleet Management Fund
section of this document. The adjustment recommended by Fleet
Management for the Solid Waste Disposal Division is to increase line
item 540-400-4750-2510 (Gas and Oil) by $72,052.
Fuel For Composting Equipment
Additional fuel is projected to be needed for the Landfill
composting equipment, in addition to the Fleet Management Division
recommended adjustment above. The commitment last May to do compost
processing in-house has added five items of heavy equipment (grinder,
trommel, turner, loader, truck) which has increased fuel consumption.
The Solid Waste Disposal Division respectfully requests that $34,000
be added to line item 540-400-4750-2510 (Gas and Oil) to provide
needed fuel for the new composting program.
Contracted Labor For Spotters
A $30,000 increase in contract labor is requested for additional
spotters needed to direct unloading activities in the
mulching/composting area and for ongoing litter cleanup. This request
is to change the contract labor line item appropriation from $98,500
to $128,500. The requested total of $128,500 for this line item is
nearly $26,000 below the actual $154,000 1993 year end expenditure
because of recent utilization of Oxbow Jail trustees. The Solid Waste
Disposal Division respectfully requests that $30,000 be added to line
item 540-400-4750-2940 (Contracted Labor) to provide needed spotting
assistance.
Depreciation
The 1991, 1992 and 1993 actual depreciation charges to the Solid
Waste Disposal Division were $495,594, $586,470 and $634,717
respectively. The adopted 1994 budget is presently projected at
$660,000 depreciation. This depreciation expense will increase as new
and more costly assets are placed into service.
Since depreciation increased an average of 13% from 1991 to 1993,
24
the Solid Waste Disposal Division recommends that a like increase be
projected for 1994 . This would mean that depreciation for 1994 could
be as high as $720, 000 for 1994 . The actual January through April
depreciation charges posted by the Auditors office would equal
approximately $701, 000 if the present trend continues. The Public
Works Department recommends that line item 540-400-4750-6580
(Depreciation) be increased by $60, 000. Please note that depreciation
is a non-cash line item and will not affect the cash position of the
Solid Waste Disposal Fund.
Closure And Postclosure Care Costs--GASB Statement 18
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) has issued
Statement #18 titled "Accounting For Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
Closure And Postclosure Care Costs" . This Statement requires that the
estimated total current cost of closure and postclosure care be posted
as expenditures as the landfill capacity is used. The requirements
of this Statement are effective for financial statements for periods
beginning after June 15, 1993 . The County has chosen to implement
this Statement in the 1993 year end financial reports. The 1993
closure and postclosure expenditure is $163 , 389 . 52 . The 1994 closure
and postclosure expenditure is projected to be $360, 000. The facts
of this new Statement was not known when the 1994 budget was requested
last November. These costs are placed in a liability account. The
Solid Waste Disposal Division has anticipated this requirement and has
placed the needed cash is their designated cash fund to cover this
expenditure. This adjustment will not affect the current adopted
operating cash for the Solid Waste Disposal Fund.
The Public Works Department respectfully requests that $360, 000
be added to line item 540-400-4750-6640 (Closure And Postclosure
Costs) .
Capital Purchases
The Solid Waste Division requests that approval be given for the
purchase and/or adjustments for capital items:
$13 , 000 net overage on purchase prices of previously approved
capital equipment items. This was due to the cost of the front-end
loader exceeding the budget estimate.
$4 , 000 for a compost site building. This building is required
to provide shelter at the compost processing area for on-site
operator, logs, gauges, equipment, tools, etc.
$5 , 000 CFC (chlorofluorocarbons) equipment. This equipment is
required by regulation to test and extract CFC's from appliances
entering the landfill in the waste stream. Extraction is required for
recycling.
$10, 000 for radiation detection equipment. This enhances the
waste inspection program by enabling inspection of loads upon entry
and in unloading areas.
25
$15,000 for a security/scalehouse building. Increased amounts
of citizen and commercial loads require periodic use of a third
processing line and scale for customers. With increased capital
investment in buildings and equipment it is vital to provide a
facility so the security guard can easily scan and observe activities
in a wide area.
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following
expenditure and cash appropriation adjustments:
INCREASE/
(DECREASE)
ASSET PURCHASES (CASH CHANGE)
Front end loader overage (Balance Sheet 1640) $ 13,000
Compost site building (Balance Sheet 1620) 4,000
Chlorofluorocarbon equipment (Balance Sheet 1640) 5,000
Radiation detection equipment (Balance Sheet 1640)10,000
Security/scalehouse building (balance Sheet 1620) 15,000
Net Asset Purchase Change $ 47,000
Net Cash Used Requested $ 47,000
26
MEMORANDUM
May 16 , 1994 .
To : Scalehouse Operators
From: Romney M. Stewart, Director
Subject : Mulch/Compost Sales
Beginning 16 May 1994 the division will have mulch/compost for
sale. Both mulch and compost will be sold at the same rates . The
fees and conditions, effective until July, will be as follows .
Single Load/Citizen, Self-Loading $5 . 00/load Code 22
Single Load/Citizen, Loaded $10 . 00/load Code 23
Commercial, Loaded $15 . 00/ton Code 24
DEFINITIONS .
Citizen loads are for home (non-commercial) use and will normally
be in pickup trucks or smaller vehicles. Commercial loads may be in
pickup trucks or larger vehicles and used by income property
owners, landscapers, gardeners, builders or other business
operators .
PROCEDURES .
All sales of mulch/compost are final . No fee refunds are available .
Material returns will not be accepted. All cash mulch/compost
sales are posted to account #00110 . When you receive a request to
have a vehicle loaded, contact the loader operator by radio and
confirm that the product, as well as a loader, are available .
Commercial cash vehicles should weigh-in, leave a deposit ( $20 . 00
min. ) , load and return to weigh out. Issue an interim receipt ( as
we do now for a weighback) so that the loader operator will have
evidence of a legitimate load. When the loaded vehicle returns
call up the receipt, type the gross weight as the tare weight and
type in the new gross weight from the scale. Finish the
transaction as usual . Trucks of businesses who have charge
accounts should weigh in and out as above. No deposit is required.
Fees are charged to the appropriate account .
Thanks .
MLCH.DD
,5\tuA4fr
May, 26 , 1995
Christopher Smart
Public Information & Research
Recycling Information Office
PRELIMINARY BAG-A-THON REPORT
to: SALT LAKE VALLEY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT COUNCIL
The 1994 Glad BAG-A-THON was both a success and a failure.
The Litter Roundup segment of the program was very
successful with at least 14 ,804 volunteers collecting over 70,000
pounds of trash. This exceeds the 1993 volunteer total by more
than 3 ,000 people and some 37,000 pounds of litter.
On the downside, there was so little recycling accomplished
through the BAG-A-THON that statistics were not even kept.
As a note of explanation, the RIO hired a person in December
1993 whose sole responsibility was the organization of the BAG-A-
THON. This individual left the RIO as the month-long BAG-A-THON
was to begin.
This unforeseen departure left the RIO at a great
disadvantage. The remaining staff: Chris Smart, Jan Teasdale, and
Bonnie Burks pitched in to rescue the program from dismal failure
in all areas.
What was observed was that although the departing BAG-A-THON
organizer had spent a lot of money, time and resources mailing
initiations and other epistles, nothing substantive had been
accomplished.
The goals established for the 1994 BAG-A-THON in December
1993 included a large effort toward recycling. In addition, a
used clothing drive was slated. As it turned out, however, no
groundwork had been laid for these programs. The remaining RIO
staff simply did not have time to organize them by the time April
1 was at hand.
Despite some failures, portions of the program were
successful . What was learned from 1994 is that RIO can be a
successful coordinator of this program by interfacing with
municipalities and other organized groups who wish to accomplish
spring cleanups and recycling. For example, successful cleanups
were accomplished by West Valley City and Earth Day Utah, which
sponsored the Jordan River Cleanup.
In both these instances, cleanups were organized and carried
out by the organizations with minimal assistance from RIO. Trash
bags were supplied by Glad and distributed through the RIO.
-more-
2
This seems to be a logical way to proceed with the BAG-A-
THON in the future, rather than having events initiated and
coordinated through the RIO.
However, to bolster recycling, the RIO should consider
organizing - or helping to organize - recycling drives by
municipalities, schools and other organized groups.
For a 1995 BAG-A-THON, the emphasis by RIO should be
recycling rather than litter cleanups. It is apparent that
municipalities, schools and other organizations will take the
lead with community spring cleanup drives.
But it may be left to the RIO to organize or coordinate
recycling drives during the BAG-A-THON.
One final note: most of the elementary schools contacted by
RIO had some type of recycling program already in place.