HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/16/2021 - Work Session - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
REVISED AGENDA
WORK SESSION
November 16,2021 Tuesday 2:00 PM
This Meeting Will be an Electronic Meeting Pursuant to the Chair’s Determination.
SLCCouncil.com
7:00 pm LBA,Board of Canvassers,and Council Formal Meeting
(See separate agenda)
Welcome and public meeting rules
The Work Session is a discussion among Council Members and select presenters.The public is welcome to listen.Items scheduled on the
Work Session or Formal Meeting may be moved and /or discussed during a different portion of the Meeting based on circumstance or
availability of speakers.
Please note:Dates not identified in the FYI -Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined.Item start times and
durations are approximate and are subject to change at the Chair’s discretion.
Generated:09:27:37
This meeting will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Chair’s determination.
As Salt Lake City Council Chair,I hereby determine that conducting the Salt Lake City Council
meeting at an anchor location presents a substantial risk to the health and safety of those who
may be present.
Members of the public are encouraged to participate in meetings.We want to make sure
everyone interested in the City Council meetings can still access the meetings how they feel most
comfortable.If you are interested in watching the City Council meetings,they are available on
the following platforms:
•Facebook Live:www.facebook.com/slcCouncil/
•YouTube:www.youtube.com/slclivemeetings
•Web Agenda:www.slc.gov/council/agendas/
•SLCtv Channel 17 Live:www.slctv.com/livestream/SLCtv-Live/2
If you are interested in participating during the Formal Meeting for the Public Hearings or
general comment period,you may do so through the Webex platform.To learn how to connect
through Webex,or if you need call-in phone options,please visit our website or call us at
801-535-7607 to learn more.
As always,if you would like to provide feedback or comment,please call us or send us an email:
•24-Hour comment line:801-535-7654
•council.comments@slcgov.com
More info and resources can be found at:www.slc.gov/council/contact-us/
Upcoming meetings and meeting information can be found here:www.slc.gov/council/agendas/
We welcome and encourage your comments!We have Council staff monitoring inboxes and
voicemail,as always,to receive and share your comments with Council Members.All agenda-
related and general comments received in the Council office are shared with the Council
Members and added to the public meeting record.View comments by visiting the Council Virtual
Meeting Comments page.
Work Session Items
1.Resolutions:Designating the Central Business Improvement Assessment
Area and to Appoint a Board of Equalization Written Briefing
The Council will receive a written briefing about two resolutions:one designating an assessment area
to be known as the Salt Lake City,Utah Central Business Improvement Assessment Area No.DA-
CBIA22,as described in the Notice of Intention to Designate Assessment Area,to proceed with the
implementation of the economic promotion activities;and the other appointing a Board of
Equalization to hear and consider objections and corrections to proposed assessments and any
arguments from persons claiming to be aggrieved;setting dates for when the Board of Equalization will
meet;and authorizing and directing the City Recorder to provide a Notice of Assessment and Board of
Equalization Hearings.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,July 13,2021 and Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,July 20,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,September 7,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,November 16,2021
2.Ordinance:EPA Revisions to Sewer Regulations Written Briefing
The Council will receive a written briefing on amendments to City Code relating to the City’s
Sewer Pretreatment Program,known as the Pretreatment Affirmative Defense Provision.The
amendments do not change the City’s regulatory practice or procedures,but are housekeeping in
nature to ensure City Code language is consistent with technical federal requirements.
Additional Division of Water Quality (DWQ)public engagement will occur prior to final Council
consideration.No impacts are anticipated to users of the system as a result of these changes.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,December 7,2021
3.Informational:Updates from the Administration ~2:00 p.m.
30 min.
The Council will receive an update from the Administration on major items or projects,including
but not limited to:
•COVID-19,the March 2020 Earthquake,and the September 2020 Windstorm;
•Updates on relieving the condition of people experiencing homelessness;
•Police Department work,projects,and staffing,etc.;and
•Other projects or updates.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Recurring Briefing
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
4.Informational:Updates on Racial Equity and Policing ~2:30 p.m.
15 min.
The Council will hold a discussion about recent efforts on various projects City staff are working
on related to racial equity and policing in the City.The conversation may include issues of
community concern about race,equity,and justice in relation to law enforcement policies,
procedures,budget,and ordinances.Discussion may include:
•An update or report on the Commission on Racial Equity in Policing;and
•Other project updates or discussion.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Recurring Briefing
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
5.Ordinance:Significant Water Consuming Land Uses Zoning Text
Amendment ~2:45 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would limit the amount of City culinary
water that commercial and industrial land uses can utilize.The zoning amendment would
implement a 300,000-gallon a day limit for commercial and industrial land uses.The limit
affects multiple zones and multiple land uses citywide.The ordinance also amends and clarifies
the definitions of related land use terms currently there is a 6-month temporary ordinance in
effect that mirrors the proposed water use restrictions in the ordinance,but will expire on
January 4,2022.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,December 7,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD
6.Ordinance:Rezone at Redwood Road and Indiana Avenue ~3:05 p.m.
15 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning of the
properties at approximately 835 South Redwood Road and 1668 West Indiana Avenue from
R-1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential District)to R-MU-45 (Residential/Mixed Use
District).The property at 1668 W Indiana currently contains an individual single-family dwelling
while the other property is vacant.No specific site development proposal has been submitted at
this time.The change is consistent with changes identified in the Westside Master Plan which
identified the intersection of Redwood and Indiana as the location of a future Community Node.
The Master Plan is not being changed.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to
another zoning district with similar characteristics.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,December 7,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD
7.Ordinance:Allowing Commercial Uses on Rooftops which Exceed 2
Stories ~3:20 p.m.
15 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the FB-SE (Form Based
Special Purpose Corridor Edge Subdistrict)zoning district to allow for rooftop commercial uses
above the second story,subject to meeting a height of 30-feet.The proposed amendment affects
section 21A.27.040.D FB-SE Building Form Standards.All properties,citywide,in the FB-SE
(Form Based Special Purpose Corridor Edge Subdistrict)would be impacted.The FB-SE zone
currently limits commercial or nonresidential uses to first two stories and a height of 30 feet.
Related provisions of Title 21A Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,December 7,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD
8.Ordinance:Master Plan Amendment and Rezone at 129 South 700 East and
758 East Bueno Avenue ~3:35 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning of properties at
724,728,732,738,744,750 and 754 East Bueno Avenue from SR-3 (Special Development Pattern
Residential District)to RMF-45 (Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District).The
applicant is proposing to amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map for the
aforementioned properties from Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density
Residential.The project proposes to consolidate 10 parcels and replace the existing structures with
two buildings:a single-story amenity building fronting 700 East and a 4-story rooming (boarding)
house on the interior of the site.The rooming house would consist of 65 units ranging from 1
bedroom to 4-bedroom units.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another
zoning district with similar characteristics.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,December 7,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,December 14,2021
9.Tentative Break ~3:55 p.m.
20 min.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
10.Ordinance:Alley Vacation at 1200 Block of Kensington and Bryan
Avenues ~4:15 p.m.
15 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would vacate a portion of City-owned
alley situated in the 1200 block of East Kensington and Bryan Avenues that runs east to west
from 1300 East to the McClelland Trail.The intent of the request is to incorporate the unused
alley into the adjacent properties.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,December 7,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,December 14,2021
11.Ordinance:Columbus Street Alley Vacation North of Victory Road ~4:30 p.m.
15 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would vacate a portion of City-owned
alley situated adjacent to properties at 583,585,589 and 595 North Columbus Street;and 590
North Victory Road.The proposal is to vacate this remaining alley segment and incorporate the
vacant land into the neighboring properties.The total area of the proposed vacation is
approximately 2750 square feet.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,December 7,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,December 14,2021
12.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.4 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 Follow-up ~4:45 p.m.
40 min
The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about an ordinance that would amend the final
budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document,for Fiscal Year 2021-22.
Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s
budgets,including proposed project additions and modifications.This amendment includes
creating a new Community Health Access Team or CHAT program,creating a new park ranger
pilot program,several items to spend American Rescue Plan Act or ARPA funds including a
new Westside perpetual housing fund,one-time community grants for non-profits and
businesses,and additional funding for the Community Commitment Program,among other
items.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,November 9,2021 and Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,November 9,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,November 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,December 7,2021
13.Informational:Health Care Innovation Blueprint ~5:25 p.m.
30 min.
The Council will receive a briefing on A Blueprint for Growing Salt Lake City’s Health Care
Innovation Economy,a document produced by the Gardener Institute at the request of the
City’s Department of Economic Development.The Blueprint lays out a rationale and strategy
for the Department to provide targeted support to businesses in the health care innovation
sector and to encourage students to pursue careers in this sector through internships and other
opportunities.The briefing will serve as a kind of mid-project review with the Council for the
Department,which has requested feedback from the Council.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
14.Resolution:Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds,Community Capital
Improvement Projects (Series 2021A and 2021B)Follow-up ~5:55 p.m.
40 min.
The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of
up to $58 million for a tax exempt bond and a taxable bond that would fund several community
capital improvement projects;giving authority to certain officers to approve the final terms and
provisions of the sale within parameters set forth in the resolution;and providing for related
matters.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,September 14,2021 and Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD
15.Board Appointment:Art Design Advisory Board –Angela Dean ~6:35 p.m.
5 min.
The Council will interview Angela Dean prior to considering appointment to the Art Design
Advisory Board for a term ending November 16,2024.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,November 16,2021
16.Ordinance:Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations TENTATIVE
The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would enact
temporary zoning regulations authorizing temporary overflow homeless shelter
use at approximately 1659 West North Temple Street.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,November 16,2021
Standing Items
17.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair
Report of Chair and Vice Chair.
18.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director
Report of the Executive Director,including a review of Council information items and
announcements.The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City
Council business,including but not limited to scheduling items.
19.Tentative Closed Session
The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session.A closed meeting described under
Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including,but not limited to:
a.discussion of the character,professional competence,or physical or mental health of an
individual;
b.strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;
c.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
d.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase,exchange,or lease of real property,including
any form of a water right or water shares,if public discussion of the transaction would:
(i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration;or
(ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible
terms;
e.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property,including any form of a water right
or water shares,if:
(i)public discussion of the transaction would:
(A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration;or
(B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible
terms;
(ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered
for sale;and
(iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the
sale;
f.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel,devices,or systems;and
g.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah
Code §78B-1-137,and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah
Open and Public Meetings Act.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 5:00 p.m.on _____________________,the undersigned,duly appointed City Recorder,
does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1)posted on the Utah Public Notice Website
created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701,and (2)a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake
Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated
interest.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda,including but not
limited to adoption,rejection,amendment,addition of conditions and variations of options
discussed.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation,which may include alternate
formats,interpreters,and other auxiliary aids and services.Please make requests at least two business days
in advance.To make a request,please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com,
801-535-7600,or relay service 711.
Item I1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Russell Weeks
Senior Advisor
DATE:November 16, 2021
RE: MOTION SHEET – RESOLUTIONS: TO DESIGNATE THE CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
ASSESSMENT AREA (CBIA -22); TO APPOINT A BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND SET BOARD OF
EQUALIZATION HEARING DATES
MOTION 1 – To Adopt the Resolutions
I move that the Council adopt the resolutions:
A.Designating an assessment area to be known as the Salt Lake City, Utah Central Business
Improvement Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA22, as described in the Notice of Intention to
Designate Assessment Area (the “Notice of Intention”); Authorizing City officials to
proceed with the implementation of the economic promotion activities as described in the
Notice of Intention; and related matters.
B. Appointing a Board of Equalization for the Salt Lake City, Utah Central Business
Improvement Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA-22, including the appointment of Jennifer
Bruno, Ben Luedtke, or Nick Tarbet as Council representation as needed; setting the
dates for the Board of Equalization to hear and consider objections and corrections to any
proposed assessments, and any arguments from persons claiming to be aggreived;
authorizing the City Recorder to publish and mail a Notice of Assessment and Board of
Equalization Hearings; and related matters.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Russell Weeks
Senior Advisor
DATE:November 17, 2021 at 4:27 PM
RE: RESOLUTIONS: TO DESIGNATE THE CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT AREA
(CBIA -22); TO APPOINT A BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, AND SET BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
HEARING DATES
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
Goal of the briefing: To update the City Council on the status, context of two proposed resolutions to
designate the Central Business Improvement Assessment Area, and to appoint a board of equalization and set
dates the board will meet to hear from property owners. This item also is scheduled for formal consideration
at the City Council’s meeting.
Due to the single written protest received by the deadline to file written protests, one motion to
adopt the ordinance is included in an attached motion sheet. City Recorder Cindy Lou Trishman will orally
report the results of received protests at the Council’s formal meeting before the City Council considers the
resolutions for adoption.
The two resolutions are the next to last legislative steps toward creating an assessment area for what is
known as the Central Business District. The current assessment area expires April 21, 2022. The Administration
would like to initiate another assessment area that would start the same day the current assessment area expires
to seamlessly continue the collection of assessment funds within the defined downtown boundary area.
The City Council held a public hearing September 7 on a notice of intention to create the proposed
assessment area. The Council closed the public hearing after no one from the public spoke. The public hearing
led the way to the resolutions now before the City Council.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: July 13, 2021
Set Date:
Public Hearing: September
7, 2021
Potential Action: November
16, 2021
Page | 2
The deadline for filing written protests to the creation of the proposed district was 5 p.m., November
8. The City published the results of the protests on November 9. The results are: One (1) written protest to the
base assessment – although the protest cited the lack of holiday lighting as the reason for the protest. (Please see
attachment from the City Recorder’s Office.)
To recap:
o The commercial property assessments have a base assessment, based on taxable commercial
property values. Some downtown commercial properties have an additional assessment where
winter holiday lighting is placed on streets. That assessment is based on linear footage. It might
be noted that street corner properties involved in the holiday lighting assessment are assessed
only for one of the two sides of a corner.
o The total assessment revenue over three years would be $5,251,285.1 It might be noted that the
total figure includes $177,378 in revenue for the smaller holiday lighting assessment. The
holiday lighting assessment is based on 13,870 linear feet times $12.79 per linear foot.2
o Minus the holiday lighting assessment, the annual projected assessment revenue for the
proposed assessment area would be $1,691,300 in each of the three years. The proposed
assessment rate for the property is .00142. It might be noted that the proposed rate in the year
2000 was .001425.3
The proposed resolutions do five things:
I. One resolution acknowledges the amount of written protests received at the end of a 60-day protest
period that ended November 8.
II. It also designates the assessment area “to levy assessments to finance the costs of the Economic
Promotion Activities” within the area.
III. The other resolution establishes a board of equalization to hear from property owners about effects
assessments may have on the owners’ individual properties.
IV. It schedules board of equalization meetings on January 11, 12, and 13 in 2022.
V. It also authorizes the City Recorder to publish and mail notices of assessment to property owners and
the board of equalization hearing schedule.
The final legislative step for the City Council tentatively will occur on March 1, 2022. The Council
would accept or modify the board of equalization’s recommendations, and adopt or reject, an assessment
ordinance.4
It should be noted that simultaneous with the release of the written protest figures on November 9,
the Administration issued a request for proposals for interested parties to manage economic promotion
programs in the assessment area. The Downtown Alliance has managed programs in the assessment area since
the area first was created nearly 30 years ago. However, City policy has required the City to seek proposals every
six years. Contracts with the downtown program managers are for three years, but the contracts usually include
an automatic renewal clause to occur in the second three years a program manager is under contract.
ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Page | 3
Assessment Area
Under Utah Law, if property owners representing 40 percent or more of the aggregate taxable value of
commercial property within the assessment area object to the area’s creation, the base assessment may not be
imposed. Similarly, if the property owners representing 40 percent or more of the total linear footage identified
for the holiday lighting assessment area object to its creation, the lighting assessment may not be imposed. The
City Council has the option to reduce the boundaries of the proposed assessment area – but the Council cannot
increase them. Again, the City Recorder’s Office received one written protest to the creation of the base
assessment area, but the written protest cited the lack of holiday lighting in front of the property as the main
reason for the protest.
According to the Administration, the 2020 value of nonexempt taxable property in the assessment
area is $3.573 billion.5 That compares to a 2018 taxable property valuation of $ 3.314 billion.6
Here are the boundaries of the base commercial property assessment area as described in the
assessment resolution:
A – North Temple from State Street to the East right-of-way line of I-15 (includes parcels on both
sides of the street)
B – East right-of-way line of I-15 from North Temple to 400 South
C – 400 South from the East right-of-way line of I-15 to 300 East (includes parcels on both sides of
the street)
D – 300 East from 400 South to South Temple (includes parcels on both sides of the street)
E – South Temple from 300 East to State Street (includes parcels on both sides of the street)
F – State Street from South Temple to North Temple (includes parcels on both sides of the street)
Here are the boundaries of the holiday lighting assessment area as described in the holiday lighting
resolution.
A – 200 South between 300 West and 400 West
B – 200 South between West Temple and 200 West (South side only)
C – Pierpont Street between West Temple and 200 West
D – West Temple between 400 South and 200 South
E – Main Street between 400 South and South Temple
F – Market Street between West Temple and Main Street (North side only)
G – State Street between 400 South and South Temple
Three other things might be noted:
Properties below $20,000 in valuation as well as residential, ecclesiastical and government
owned properties are exempt from the assessments, except for exempted properties whose
owners agree in writing to be assessed.
For the holiday lighting assessment, owners of corner properties would be assessed for the
linear footage of one of the two streets fronting their properties instead of for both streets.
In August the Department of Economic Development said the Department had mailed 1,424
notices to 712 property owners within the proposed assessment area. The mailing addresses
were taken from the Salt Lake County Assessor’s Office list of property owners within the
proposed area. Roughly 27 percent – 381 notices – were returned by the end of August as
undeliverable either because of an incorrect address, or the person listed as the owner no longer
was at the address on the notice. The Department kept all the returned notices for reference if a
property owner indicates having not received a notice. The proposed resolution includes a list of
property owners in the assessment area and their addresses.
Page | 4
Board of Equalization
Because the single written protest and the percentage of property it represents did not meet the legal
threshold to stop the assessment areas from being formed, the second resolution involves establishing a board of
equalization and setting dates for that board to meet.
The function of the board of equalization is “to hear and consider any arguments from persons who
claim to be aggrieved and, following the hearings, to consider all facts and arguments presented at the hearings,
and to and make corrections to the proposed assessments that the Board may deem necessary to meet the
requirements” of Utah law, according to the resolution.
The proposed resolution would appoint a three-member panel. The panel will be made up of “one
member of the City Council or a representative of the City Council; a representative of the City Treasurer’s
Office; and a representative of the City Engineer’s Office.”
The proposed resolution names Marina Scott and Steven Bagley as representatives of the Treasurer’s
Office, and Chris Norlem as the representative of the Engineer’s Office. The proposed resolution leaves the City
Council Member or the Council’s representative up to the Council to determine.
According to the resolution, “After the Board has held all hearings and has made all corrections the
Board considers necessary to comply with the law, the Board will report its findings to the City Council of the
City. Appeal from a decision of the Board of Equalization may be taken to the City Council of the City by filing
with the City Council a written notice of appeal in the office of the City Recorder within fifteen (15) days after the
date the Board’s final report to the City Council is mailed to the affected property owners.”
1 Administration Transmittal, Ben Kolendar, June 22, 2021, Page 2.
2 Administration Transmittal, Ben Kolendar, June 22, 2021, Page 2.
3 Memo, Motion Options for Proposed Renewal of Central Business Economic Improvement District DA-CBID-00,
November 30, 2000.
4 Administration Transmittal, September 17, 2021, Page 3.
5 Administration Transmittal, Ben Kolendar, June 22, 2021, Page 2.
6 City Council staff report, Notice of Intention to Create Central Business Improvement Area, Russell Weeks, August 9,
2018, Page 3.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
CITY RECORDER
ERIN MENDENHALL
MAYOR
LOCATION: 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 415, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111
MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 145515, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5515
TELEPHONE: 801-535-7671 FAX: 801-535-7681
November 9, 2021
To Whom It May Concern:
Please see the statement below regarding documentation or calculation of any and all Central
Business Improvement Area 2022 (CBIA-22) protests files with the Office of the City Recorder
of Salt Lake either in person during regular business hours or by mail on or before 5:00 p.m. on
November 8, 2021.
One property filed a protest.
Total Estimated Based Assessment of the property: $1,113.90
Total Estimated Holiday Lighting Assessment of property: None
Notice of the protests received will be published on the Utah Public Meeting Notice site under
the City Recorder, and the City website. Please see the enclosed protest and tracking sheet as
information for the record. Should you have any questions and desire additional information,
please contact me at (801) 535-6223.
Sincerely,
Cindy Lou Trishman
City Recorder
September 13, 2021
Date Property Owner Parcel Address or Parcel Number Description of ProtestEstimated Base AssessmentEstimated Holiday Lighting Assessment13‐Sep‐21H&M Elite International Consulting15‐01‐285‐041‐000Holiday lights not a benefit for the specific property location $ 1,113.90 None 11/9/2021CBIA‐22.xlsx
DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ERIN MENDENHALL
MAYOR
BEN KOLENDAR
DIRECTOR
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Date Received: ___________ ___________________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ___________
___________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: September 17, 2021
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Ben Kolendar, Director - Department of Economic Development
SUBJECT: Resolution to Designate the Central Business Improvement Assessment
Area (CBIA -22) and to Appoint a Board of Equalization (BOE) and
set Board of Equalization hearing dates.
STAFF CONTACTS: Lorena Riffo Jenson, Deputy Director, Lorena.riffojenson@slcgov.com
Jolynn Walz, Office Manager, jolynn.walz@slcgov.com
William Wright, Project Coordinator, William.wright@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution to Designate the Central Business Improvement
Area 2022 (CB1A-22) and create a Board of Equalization (BOB).
BUDGET IMPACT: The CBIA-22 would be funded through Special Assessment.
COORDINATION: Economic Development, Treasurer’s Office, Engineering, Recorders
Office, City Council, Mayor’s Office, Attorney’s Office & Bonneville Research Consultant
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Salt Lake City established the Central Business Improvement
Area (CBIA) in 1991 as a mechanism to fund marketing, promotions, advocacy, and other
initiatives in Downtown Salt Lake City through a special assessment on property within a
designated area.
The current assessment area, CBIA-19, expires April 21, 2022. The Administration wishes to
initiate another assessment area, CBIA-22, by April 22, 2022 to continue the collection of
assessment funds within a defined downtown boundary area. This allows for the continuation of
Lisa Shaffer (Sep 23, 2021 15:00 MDT)
09/23/2021
09/23/2021
marketing, promotion, advocacy, and other benefits that have and will accrue to the City and
downtown property owners and businesses through services provided by the RFP recipient
contractor (currently the Downtown Alliance). The special assessment also funds an ambassador’s
program in Downtown Salt Lake City. The goal of the ambassador program is to promote
economic growth by increasing local business activity through in-person wayfinding assistance for
visitors and connecting the City’s homeless population with available resources. If approved, the
Administration would like to continue this program and use the downtown special assessment
area as a continued funding source.
Since the inception of the CBIA, commonly known as a Business Improvement District or Special
Assessment Area, the funds collected for the Area have been used to fund the Downtown Alliance
under a contract with Salt Lake City Corporation. The contract with the Downtown Alliance will
expire with the current CBIA-19 and the Administration will announce an RFP which will use the
proceeds of this assessment for a contractor to do the work the Downtown Alliance currently does.
The Downtown Alliance will be able to submit for the RFP.
The creation of the CBIA is a lengthy and complex process that is governed by State law, has
numerous noticing provisions, public hearings, and other requirements that involve a variety of
City Council actions, in order to meet the deadline for continuous funding from the Area.
Board of Equalization: As required by law, a Board of Equalization for the Assessment Area is
appointed by the City Council. The Board will consist of representatives from the City Council
Office, City Treasurer’s Office, and City Engineer’s Office.
The Board of Equalization will meet to hear and consider any arguments from persons or property
owners who claim to be aggrieved. They will consider all facts and arguments presented at the
hearings and make corrections to the proposed assessments when necessary. The Board may elect
to hold the meetings in-person at the City & County Building in room 326 or electronically.
Property owners who desire to protest the assessment area have to provide a written protest to the
City by November 8, 2021, during the 60-day protest period.
The Board of Equalization Hearings Schedule:
January 11, 2022 - between 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m.
January 12, 2022 - between 10:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m.
January 13, 2022, - between 1:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m.
Previous Action/discussion by the Council concerning the CBIA-22:
● April 20, 2021 – Informational: Central Business Improvement Area 2022
● July 13, 2021 – Resolution: Intention to Designate Central Business Improvement Area
2022
● July 20, 2021 – Adoption: Resolution Intention to Designate Central Business
Improvement Area 2022
Remaining Proposed Council Actions:
● November 16, 2021 - City Council announces the protest tally and if it exceeds the
threshold; City Council adopts the Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and
appoints the Board of Equalization
● March 1, 2022 - City Council accepts or modifies the BOE recommendations and adopts or
rejects the Assessment Ordinance
Attachments:
● Resolution to Designate
● Resolution to Appoint Board of Equalization
● Boundary Map
● Holiday Lighting Parcel Map
● CBIA-22 Timeline
Designation Resolution
Salt Lake City, Utah
November 16, 2021
A regular meeting of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), was
held on Tuesday, November 16, 2021, at 7:00 p.m., via electronic means, at which meeting
there were present the following members who constituted a quorum:
Amy Fowler Chair
James Rogers Vice-Chair
Dan Dugan Councilmember
Ana Valdemoros Councilmember
Dennis Faris Councilmember
Darin Mano Councilmember
Chris Wharton Councilmember
Also present:
Erin Mendenhall Mayor
Katherine Lewis City Attorney
Cindy Lou Trishman City Recorder
Absent:
Thereupon the following proceedings, among others, were duly had and taken:
Pursuant to published and posted notice concerning the intent of the City to
designate the Salt Lake City, Utah Central Business Improvement Assessment Area No.
DA-CBIA-22 (the “Assessment Area”), a public hearing was held on September 7, 2021,
at which interested persons were heard concerning comments or objections relating to the
Assessment Area.
On the date hereof, the City Council has counted the written protests and calculated
whether adequate protests have been filed. The City Council then announced the protest
tally and determined that adequate protests were not filed with respect to the Base
Assessment or the Holiday Lighting Assessment (as such terms are used in Resolution 25
of 2021 adopted by the City Council on July 20, 2021 (the “Intent Resolution”)) and
therefore the City Council may designate the Assessment Area as described in the Intent
Resolution. The City Council then concluded that the public interest will best be served
by designating the Assessment Area.
4828-2501-6059, v. 3 2 Designation Resolution
Councilmember __________ then moved and Councilmember ___________
seconded the adoption of the following resolution. The resolution was adopted by the
following vote:
AYE:
NAY:
4828-2501-6059, v. 3 3 Designation Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. ____ OF 2021
A Resolution designating an assessment area to be known as the Salt Lake
City, Utah Central Business Improvement Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA-
22, as described in the Notice of Intention to Designate Assessment Area
(the “Notice of Intention”); Authorizing the City officials to proceed with
the implementation of the economic promotion activities as described in the
Notice of Intention; and Related Matters.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah
(the “City”), as follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Assessment Area Act, Title 11, Chapter 42, Utah Code
Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), on July 20, 2021, the Council adopted a
resolution of intention to designate an assessment area to be known as the “Salt Lake City,
Utah Central Business Improvement Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA-22” (the
“Assessment Area”), and after giving notice as required by the Act, held a public hearing
on September 7, 2021 (the “Public Hearing”), at which interested persons were given an
opportunity to provide objections relating to said Assessment Area; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the City posted the total and percentage of the
written protests it had received on its website at least five days before the date of this
meeting; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11-42-206 of the Act, and consistent with the
Notice of Intention, the Council now desires to designate the Assessment Area.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows:
Section 1. The Council has determined that it will be in the best interest of the
City to finance the proposed activities, which include, but are not limited to, advertising,
marketing, special events, festivals, transportation, newsletters, publications, banners,
Christmas lighting, security, special projects, housing, town meetings, government policy,
cultural promotion, reports, surveys, homeless services and other promotional activities
(the “Economic Promotion Activities”) in the downtown area for the benefit of the
properties within the Assessment Area. The Council has also determined that the
Economic Promotion Activities will benefit all properties within the Assessment Area to
the extent of their proposed assessment.
Section 2. The City hereby designates the Assessment Area to levy
assessments to finance the costs of the Economic Promotion Activities.
Section 3. The tax identification numbers and additional information of the
properties to be assessed within the Assessment Area are more fully set forth in Exhibit B
attached hereto. The Assessments to finance the cost of the Economic Promotion Activities
will be levied based upon (i) 2021 taxable property values of the properties to be assessed
in the Assessment Area (the “Base Assessment”), plus (ii) linear feet (except that corner
lots will not be assessed for both frontages as applicable, only one) on certain properties
4828-2501-6059, v. 3 4 Designation Resolution
with frontage on the Holiday Lighting Streets (as defined in the Notice of Intention) for
special holiday lights (the “Holiday Lighting Assessment”).
The Assessment Area is described by reference to the following streets (the
“Reference Streets”):
A – North Temple from State Street to the East right-of-way line of I-15 (includes
parcels on both sides of the street)
B – East right-of-way line of I-15 from North Temple to 400 South
C – 400 South from the East right-of-way line of I-15 to 300 East
(includes parcels on both sides of the street)
D – 300 East from 400 South to South Temple (includes parcels on both
sides of the street)
E – South Temple from 300 East to State Street (includes parcels on both
sides of the street)
F – State Street from South Temple to North Temple (includes parcels on both
sides of the street)
The area of the Assessment Area shall include all property bounded by Reference
Streets A through F described above. In addition it shall include parcels of property,
subject to the exceptions set out in the Notice of Intention, which abut the Reference Streets
plus all corner parcels which have a corner touching any of the Reference Streets.
The Holiday Lighting Assessment shall apply to the following streets (collectively,
the “Holiday Lighting Streets”):
A – 200 South between 300 West and 400 West
B – 200 South between West Temple and 200 West (South side only)
C – Pierpont Street between West Temple and 200 West
D – West Temple between 400 South and 200 South
E – Main Street between 400 South and South Temple
F – Market Street between West Temple and Main Street (North side only)
G – State Street between 400 South and South Temple
Section 4. As required by law, within fifteen (15) days from the date hereof,
the City Recorder is hereby authorized and directed to (a) record in the Salt Lake County
Recorder’s office an original or certified copy of this Resolution designating the
Assessment Area, and (b) file in the Salt Lake County Recorder’s office a Notice of
Proposed Assessment, in substantially the form of Exhibit C hereof, which states that the
Council has designated the Assessment Area and which lists the properties proposed to be
assessed, described by legal description and tax identification number.
4828-2501-6059, v. 3 5 Designation Resolution
After the conduct of other business not pertinent to the above, the meeting was, on
motion duly made and seconded, adjourned.
(SEAL)
By:_________________________________
Chair
ATTEST:
By:
City Recorder
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
Boyd Ferguson
Senior City Attorney
Boyd Ferguson
4828-2501-6059, v. 3 6 Designation Resolution
4828-2501-6059, v. 3 7 Designation Resolution
PRESENTATION TO THE MAYOR
The foregoing resolution was presented to the Mayor for her approval or
disapproval on ____________, 2021.
By:
Chair
MAYOR’S APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved on this _____________, 2021.
By:
Mayor
4828-2501-6059, v. 3 8 Designation Resolution
STATE OF UTAH )
: ss.
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the duly appointed and qualified City Recorder of Salt Lake
City, Utah (the “City”), do hereby certify according to the records of the City Council of
the City in my official possession that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct excerpt
of the minutes of the meeting of the City Council held on November 16, 2021, including a
resolution (the “Resolution”) adopted at said meeting as said minutes and Resolution are
officially of record in my possession.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my signature and impressed
hereon the official seal of said City, this November 16, 2021.
City Recorder
(SEAL)
4828-2501-6059, v. 3 A-1 Designation Resolution
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH
OPEN MEETING LAW
I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the undersigned City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the
“City”), do hereby certify, according to the records of the City in my official possession,
and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the requirements of
Section 52-4-202, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, I gave not less than twenty-
four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time and place of the November 16, 2021
public meeting held by the City Council of the City (the “City Council”), as follows:
(a) By causing a copy of such Notice, in the form attached hereto as
Schedule 1, to be delivered to the Salt Lake Tribune on ___________, 2021, at least
twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting; and
(b) By causing a copy of such Notice, in the form attached hereto as
Schedule 1, to be published on the Utah Public Notice Website
(http://pmn.utah.gov) at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the
meeting.
In addition, the Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting Schedule for the City Council
(attached hereto as Schedule 2) was given specifying the date, time, and place of the regular
meetings of the City Council to be held during the year, by causing said Notice to be (a)
posted on ___________, 2021, at the principal office of the City Council, (b) provided to
at least one newspaper of general circulation within the City on ___________, 2021, and
(c) published on the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov) during the current
calendar year.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature this
November 16, 2021.
City Recorder
(SEAL)
4828-2501-6059, v. 3 A-2 Designation Resolution
SCHEDULE 1
NOTICE OF MEETING
4828-2501-6059, v. 3 A-3 Designation Resolution
SCHEDULE 2
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING SCHEDULE
4828-2501-6059, v. 3 B-1 Designation Resolution
EXHIBIT B
TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
OF PROPERTIES TO BE ASSESSED
Page 1 of 1Owner NameALTA CLUBBOYER 101 LCMRK FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPBOYER 102 LCMERCIER 102, LLCZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANKZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANKSAB ENTERPRISES LLCSEJ ASSET MANAGEMENT &;INVESTMENT COMPANYNEWHOUSE OFFICE BUILDING LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCTEN W 100, LLCCREF3 CLIFT OWNER, LLCPROPERTY RESERVE, INCVESTAR GATEWAY, LLCREGENT HOLDINGS LLCNBT-ERI PEERY, LLCBROADWAY CENTRE INVESTMENT;LIMITED PARTNERSHIPSOCIAL HALL PROPERTIES LLC111 MAIN LLCPROPERTY RESERVE, INCFJ MANAGEMENT INC115 SOCIAL HALL LLCROYAL WOOD ASSOCIATES39/42 LLCZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK, N AIN/OUT CORPORATION400 SOUTH LLCZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANKVMM ARROW PRESS LLCGATEWAY ASSOCIATES, LTD311 STATE LLCZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANKFEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN;FRANCISCOZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANKVILLAGE 415/PIERPONT SPE, LLC;M-53 ASSOCIATES, LLC; INT122 S MAIN ST 18026 15 01 229 035 0000 PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTON KY 40555-4288122 W PIERPONT AVE 18124 15 01 276 017 0000 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-3175120 S MAIN ST 18025 15 01 229 034 0000 PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTON KY 40555-4288120 S STATE ST 32163 16 06 106 003 0000 101 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-157911 N RIO GRANDE ST 77726 08 36 376 046 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-3104120 E 300 S 32324 16 06 155 002 0000 160 GREENTREE DR DOVER DE 19904-7620118 S MAIN ST 18024 15 01 229 033 0000 PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTON KY 40555-4288119 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18013 15 01 229 011 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764117 W 300 S 18150 15 01 279 002 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917117 W 400 S 72078 15 01 429 013 0000 117 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1916115 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18012 15 01 229 010 0000 51 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2711116 S MAIN ST 18023 15 01 229 032 0000 PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTON KY 40555-4288115 E SOCIAL HALL AVE 32111 16 06 103 176 0000 PO BOX 112347 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84147-2347115 S 300 W 17963 15 01 207 001 0000 PO BOX 738 GREAT FALLS MT 59403-0738113 E 1ST AVE 13901 09 31 379 024 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196115 E 200 S 32172 16 06 107 009 0000 185 S STATE ST PH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-111 E SOCIAL HALL AVE 32110 16 06 103 175 0000 2356 S DALLIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109-1525111 S MAIN ST 76963 16 06 105 062 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196110 W 300 S 18140 15 01 277 020 0000 2101 SUPERIOR AVE 300 CLEVELAND OH 44114-2153111 E 300 S 32304 16 06 154 010 0000 222 S MAIN ST 1760 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-2140110 S 400 W 69821 15 01 177 010 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85016-110 S REGENT ST 76561 16 06 105 057 0000 110 S REGENT ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-190310 W 300 S 18168 15 01 280 033 0000 ONE MARKET PLAZA SPE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-110 N 400 W 9674 08 36 329 008 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119610 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 73941 16 06 101 024 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119610 W 100 S 17991 15 01 227 046 0000 10 W 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1508109 S 300 E 32253 16 06 130 001 0000 PO BOX 711 DALLAS TX 75221-10 E EXCHANGE PL 32946 16 06 302 001 0000 2716 OCEAN PARK BLVD SANTA MONICA CA 90405-5209102 S MAIN ST 18022 15 01 229 031 0000 PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTON KY 40555-4288103 E SOCIAL HALL AVE 32109 16 06 103 174 0000 103 E SOCIAL HALL AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1503102 S 600 W 17824 15 01 107 009 0000 358 S 700 E B507 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102-102 S MAIN ST 18016 15 01 229 017 0000 PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTON KY 40555-4288102 N 300 W 10378 08 36 452 015 0000 118 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-1118102 S 200 E 76941 16 06 107 041 0000 101 S 200 E 200 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-3107100 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 31955 16 06 102 001 0000 100 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1187101 S 200 E 76790 16 06 129 035 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-3104Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183Property Address Account Property IDOwner Address
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183DIAMOND PARKING INCVMM ARROW PRESS LLCZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANKCITY CREEK RESERVE, INCSWEET, JYLLANA BUCHERDHM SALT LAKE CITY HOTEL;LESSEE, LPPAINLESS PARKING LLCSLC 130 WEST OWNER LLCROYAL WOOD ASSOCIATESREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF;SALT LAKE CITYPROPERTY RESERVE INCBROADWAY CENTRE INVESTMENT;LIMITED PARTNERSHIPDHM SALT LAKE CITY HOTEL;LESSEE, LPSLC GATEWAY STORAGE PARTNERS,;LLCPROPERTY RESERVE INCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCHARMON CITY CREEK (EAT) LLCREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF;SALT LAKE CITYVESTAR GATEWAY, LLCLCC STT LLCKEARNS BUILDING JOINT VENTUREPROPERTY RESERVE INCBK HOTEL, LLC140 E SOUTH TEMPLE LLCSLC 140 SOUTH OWNER LLCSLC 130 WEST OWNER LLCPROPERTY RESERVE, INCCOMMUNITY FIRST NATIONAL BANK39/42 TRIBUNE LLCDWB LLC; ET ALPROPERTY RESERVE INCTORIA J MAGLEBY FAM LIV TR;MAGLEBY, TORIA J; TRSLC PARKING OWNER LLCVILLAGE 415, LLC; 40%;M-53 ASSOCIATES, LLC; 60% INTJ & M BOLLWINKEL LLCDINSIMO MANAGEMENT, INCVMM, LLC147 S WEST TEMPLE ST 77518 15 01 229 079 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764145 W 200 S 18119 15 01 276 005 0000 145 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1401145 W PIERPONT AVE 18133 15 01 277 008 0000 30 KEYSTONE AVE MORGAN HILL CA 95037-4325144 S 300 W 76895 15 01 129 039 0000 PO BOX A3956 CHICAGO IL 60690-3956144 W PIERPONT AVE 62659 15 01 276 022 0000 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-3175143 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 64903 08 36 478 022 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196143 W PIERPONT AVE 72076 15 01 277 031 0000 1175 E SECOND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-4115143 S MAIN ST 32159 16 06 105 043 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764143 W 300 S 67730 15 01 278 005 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917141 S REGENT ST 32275 16 06 151 023 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196142 E 200 S 32310 16 06 154 030 0000 PO BOX 5155 SAN RAMON CA 94583-5155140 S 300 W 76894 15 01 129 038 0000 PO BOX A3956 CHICAGO IL 60690-3956140 W 400 S 18773 15 01 428 014 0000 PO BOX A3956 CHICAGO IL 60690-3956139 W 200 S 77855 15 01 276 026 0000 2733 E PARLEYS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109-1619140 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 31957 16 06 102 003 0000 1800 W BERENICE CHICAGO IL 60613-136 S MAIN ST 18033 15 01 229 055 0000 136 S MAIN ST 850 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1652139 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 13914 09 31 380 020 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196135 S 500 W 75874 15 01 185 006 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85016-136 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 31956 16 06 102 002 0000 55 RAILWOOD AVE GREENWICH CT 06830-135 E 100 S 75905 16 06 104 029 0000 3540 S 4000 W 500 WEST VALLEY UT 84120-3296135 E 300 S 32321 16 06 154 048 0000 PO BOX 145518 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114-5518134 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 65240 08 36 476 054 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196135 E 100 S 75904 16 06 104 028 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196133 W 400 S 18781 15 01 429 004 0000 11770 US HIGHWAY 1 202 NORTH PALM BEACH FL 33408-134 S 700 W 72607 15 02 234 017 0000 1242 W JACKSON ST PHOENIX AZ 85034-132 S STATE ST 69994 16 06 151 029 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196133 E 300 S 32322 16 06 154 049 0000 222 S MAIN ST 1760 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-2140131 S 300 W 17964 15 01 207 002 0000 PO BOX 738 GREAT FALLS MT 59403-0738131 S MAIN ST 77685 16 06 105 064 0000 PO BOX 145518 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114-5518128 W 300 S 18147 15 01 277 027 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917130 W 400 S 18774 15 01 428 015 0000 PO BOX A3956 CHICAGO IL 60690-3956126 S 200 W 17970 15 01 207 023 0000 378 N QUINCE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-1643127 W 400 S 18782 15 01 429 005 0000 11770 US HIGHWAY 1 202 NORTH PALM BEACH FL 33408-124 S MAIN ST 18027 15 01 229 036 0000 PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTON KY 40555-4288125 E SOCIAL HALL AVE 72837 16 06 102 022 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196123 E 200 S 32173 16 06 107 010 0000 605 FIRST AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98104-123 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18014 15 01 229 012 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183ROCKY MOUNTAIN BREWERY;HOLDINGS LCEBT LTDCITYCREEKRANCH.COM LLCHB3, LLCPIERPONT INVESTORS, LLPAHO, ED JAMESRICHARDSON, LON R JR; TR150 E SOUTH TEMPLE LLCK M S LIMITED150 S STATE LLCPEG SLC 360 SOUTH LLCPROPERTY RESERVE, INCHOPE PROPERTIES, LLCBOYER 151 LCDHM SALT LAKE CITY HOTEL;LESSEE, LPPROPERTY RESERVE INCDAGHLIAN, RAFFI &;MARLEEN (JT)KBSIII 155 NORTH 400 WEST,;LLCAXIS BUILDING ASSOCIATES, LLCKBSIII 155 NORTH 400 WEST,;LLCTHE ASIAN ASSOCIATION;OF UTAHEVA'S BAKERY LLCPROPERTY RESERVE INCLAKE EFFECT PROPERTY, LLCHOTEL CORNER LLCSUPER LLC257 EAST SALT LAKE LLCWCH LLCREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF;SALT LAKE CITYWCH LLCM N V HOLDINGS159 LLCGAITHER PROPERTIES LLCBERC HOLDINGS LLCTOP DRAWER HOLDINGS, LLCPROPERTY RESERVE INCPIERPONT HOLDINGS, LLCEXCHANGE PLACE GARAGEO C TANNER COMPANY15 E EXCHANGE PL 66884 16 06 301 033 0000 222 S MAIN ST 1760 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-214015 S STATE ST 31962 16 06 102 008 0000 1930 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115-2311159 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 11133 08 36 478 003 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196159 W PIERPONT AVE 18132 15 01 277 006 0000 151 W PIERPONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1902159 W 300 S 67731 15 01 407 001 0000 395 E CLUBVIEW LN LEHI UT 84043-9602159 W 300 S 67740 15 01 407 010 0000 159 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1914159 S MAIN ST 75871 16 06 105 055 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764159 W 300 S 67736 15 01 407 006 0000 159 W 300 S 105 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-158 S REGENT ST 75869 16 06 105 053 0000 175 S MAIN ST 610 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1966158 S STATE ST 32267 16 06 151 012 0000 158 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1506158 S REGENT ST 75870 16 06 105 054 0000 175 S MAIN ST 610 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1966158 S REGENT ST 75868 16 06 105 052 0000 451 S STATE ST 418 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1597156 E 200 S 32328 16 06 176 002 0000 625 S STATE ST D SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-156 S 300 E 32350 16 06 177 009 0000 101 YGNACIO VALLEY RD WALNUT CREEK CA 94596-7018155 W 200 S 18117 15 01 276 003 0000 3362 W 1820 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104-4922155 W 400 S 18779 15 01 429 002 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764155 S MAIN ST 71091 16 06 105 048 0000 155 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917155 S PLUM ALY 68091 16 06 151 025 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196155 N 400 W 77721 08 36 376 057 0000 PO BOX 28270 SANTA ANA CA 92799-155 S 300 W 17965 15 01 207 003 0000 155 S 300 W 101 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1289152 N 500 W 77720 08 36 376 056 0000 PO BOX 28270 SANTA ANA CA 92799-152 W PIERPONT AVE 62658 15 01 276 021 0000 175 S MAIN ST 610 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1966151 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 64945 08 36 478 023 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196152 E 200 S 32327 16 06 176 001 0000 541 E NORTHHILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-3337151 S STATE ST 76943 16 06 107 040 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-3104151 W 400 S 18780 15 01 429 003 0000 11770 US HIGHWAY 1 202 NORTH PALM BEACH FL 33408-151 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 13915 09 31 380 021 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196151 S MAIN ST 32129 16 06 105 011 0000 789 N NORTHVIEW DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-4018150 S STATE ST 32265 16 06 151 010 0000 5288 S COMMERCE DR MURRAY UT 84107-4712150 W 400 S 18770 15 01 428 005 0000 180 N UNIVERSITY AVE PROVO UT 84601-150 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 31958 16 06 102 004 0000 1800 W BERENICE CHICAGO IL 60613-150 S 700 W 19412 15 02 234 008 0000 728 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104-100614 N 600 W 75474 08 36 354 025 0000 14 N 600 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116-343314 S 200 E 31964 16 06 102 012 0000 872 S WOODRUFF WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-1460149 W 200 S 18118 15 01 276 004 0000 1717 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-1839149 W PIERPONT AVE 18142 15 01 277 022 0000 30 KEYSTONE AVE MORGAN HILL CA 95037-4325149 E 200 S 76942 16 06 107 039 0000 242 S 1200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102-2651149 S MAIN ST 32128 16 06 105 010 0000 PO BOX 1209 ARDMORE OK 73402-147 W 300 S 18116 15 01 259 004 0000 147 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1914
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183IA LODGING SALT LAKE CITY, LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCK M S LIMITEDLASALLE, JOEL; 50% INT;YOUNG, JARED; 50% INT200 SOUTH LLCSLC 130 WEST OWNER LLCDESERET TITLE HOLDING CORPOZ7 OPPORTUNITY FUND, LLCWCH LLCPROPERTY RESERVE INC163 LLCKWJ IV INVESTMENTS LLCPROPERTY RESERVE INCDIAMOND PARKING INCPROPERTY RESERVE INCPEG SLC 360 SOUTH LLCSIMANTOB, JACK & EDMOND; TCSPEROS ENTERPRISESDAKOTA PACIFIC REGENT LLCOB-OK, LLCSTEDAV LLCPROPERTY RESERVE, INCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCK M S LIMITED200 SOUTH MAIN STREET;INVESTORS LLCDEBOUZEK, JEANETTE; TR;ET ALHOTEL CORNER LLCPENTAGON-303, LLCSUMNER PLACE LLCHAYS, LARRY J, LAWRENCE J, III;& PATRICK G, TRS (JT)BUSY LANE DEVELOPMENT LLCBUSY LANE DEVELOPMENT LLCBUSY LANE DEVELOPMENT LLCBUSY LANE DEVELOPMENT LLCUPG CITY CENTRE BUILDING;PROPERTY OWNER, LLCUNICO 205 EAST 200 SOUTH;CENTER LLCWCH LLC175 S MAIN ST 32140 16 06 105 023 0000 175 S MAIN ST 610 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1966175 E 400 S 32971 16 06 305 022 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE SEATTLE WA 98161-175 S 200 E 32244 16 06 129 022 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-175 E 200 S 71846 16 06 110 004 0000 313 S MARYFIELD DR EMIGRATN CYN UT 84108-1541175 E 200 S 71844 16 06 110 002 0000 313 S MARYFIELD DR EMIGRATN CYN UT 84108-1541175 E 200 S 71845 16 06 110 003 0000 313 S MARYFIELD DR EMIGRATN CYN UT 84108-1541175 E 200 S 71847 16 06 110 005 0000 313 S MARYFIELD DR EMIGRATN CYN UT 84108-1541174 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 31960 16 06 102 006 0000 1532 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105-1710174 S REGENT ST 32156 16 06 105 040 0000 175 S MAIN ST 610 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1966171 W 400 S 18778 15 01 429 001 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764173 W 300 S 18115 15 01 259 003 0000 PO BOX 980907 PARK CITY UT 84098-170 S MAIN ST 18038 15 01 229 061 0000 PO BOX 1368 CARLSBAD CA 92018-170 S REGENT ST 32155 16 06 105 039 0000 413 10TH ST SW ALBUQUERQUE NM 87102-169 E 100 S 75386 16 06 126 008 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196170 S 700 W 19417 15 02 234 014 0000 728 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104-1006166 E 200 S 32329 16 06 176 003 0000 8248 S OAK CIR SANDY UT 84093-6923168 S STATE ST 32273 16 06 151 021 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196165 S REGENT ST 70806 16 06 151 028 0000 299 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1941165 S WEST TEMPLE ST 75260 15 01 229 077 0000 230 NORTH STREET DANVERS MA 01923-1279165 E 200 S 32176 16 06 107 014 0000 1961 S LA CIENEGA BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90034-165 S MAIN ST 32139 16 06 105 022 0000 PO BOX 17954 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117-0954164 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 31959 16 06 102 005 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196164 W 400 S 18769 15 01 428 004 0000 180 N UNIVERSITY AVE PROVO UT 84601-163 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 11131 08 36 478 001 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196163 W PIERPONT AVE 18128 15 01 277 001 0000 605 FIRST AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98104-163 S MAIN ST 32138 16 06 105 021 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917163 W 200 S 73194 15 01 284 023 0000 547 W 2600 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010-161 S MAIN ST 75867 16 06 105 051 0000 175 S MAIN ST 610 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1966161 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 11132 08 36 478 002 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196160 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 11136 08 36 478 009 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196161 S 600 W 17837 15 01 108 008 0000 1810 W 700 N LINDON UT 84042-160 S STATE ST 32274 16 06 151 022 0000 347 CONGRESS ST BOSTON MA 02210-160 W 400 S 62677 15 01 428 021 0000 PO BOX A3956 CHICAGO IL 60690-3956160 S 700 W 19413 15 02 234 009 0000 728 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104-1006160 S MAIN ST 72308 15 01 229 074 0000 151 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102-190615 W 200 S 67793 15 01 280 061 0000 200 S ORANGE AVE 2700 ORLANDO FL 32801-344615 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 74506 15 01 227 060 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183BVREF 175, LLCAXIS BUILDING ASSOCIATESRICHARDSON, LON R JR; TRBCAL GATEWAY PROPERTY LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE, INCBERNOLFO, DAVID W; TRCOURTSIDE PLAZA, LLC4TH SOUTH ASSOCIATES, LLCFJ MANAGEMENT INCFJ MANAGEMENT INCFJ MANAGEMENT INCFJ MANAGEMENT INCFJ MANAGEMENT INCFJ MANAGEMENT INCFJ MANAGEMENT INCFJ MANAGEMENT INCFJ MANAGEMENT INCFJ MANAGEMENT INCFJ MANAGEMENT INCFJ MANAGEMENT INCFJ MANAGEMENT INCCITY CREEK RESERVE, INCWCH LLCWCH LLCUTAH FIRST FEDERAL CREDIT;UNIONWORTHINGTON TPIII, LLCBOYER BLOCK 57 ASSOCIATESYOUNG JIM LLC202 W VENTURES LLCUNICO 205 EAST 200 SOUTH;CENTER LLC204 BROADWAY, LLCUNICO 205 EAST 200 SOUTH;CENTER LLC205 WEST 400 SOUTH, LLCRED DESERT HOLDINGS, LCMAVERIK COUNTRY STORES INCPROPERTY RESERVE INCSALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION200 SOUTH MAIN STREET;INVESTORS LLCPRIER HOLDINGS LLC20 W 200 S 18040 15 01 229 063 0000 PO BOX 1368 CARLSBAD CA 92018-211 S 300 E 32402 16 06 182 004 0000 13 PARADISE CV ALPINE UT 84004-196120 S 200 E 31965 16 06 102 013 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119620 S 600 W 17792 15 01 101 006 0000 PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114-5460206 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18121 15 01 276 008 0000 1125 N HOVI HILLS DR CEDAR CITY UT 84721-206 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 10391 08 36 452 039 0000 185 S STATE ST 800 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1549205 E 200 S 32246 16 06 129 024 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-205 W 400 S 18755 15 01 406 029 0000 919 CR 4460 DECATUR TX 76234-203 E 200 S 32245 16 06 129 023 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-204 E 300 S 32390 16 06 180 001 0000 347 CONGRESS ST BOSTON MA 02210-202 W 300 S 18109 15 01 257 010 0000 15 W 6TH ST TULSA OK 74119-202 W 400 S 76917 15 01 402 024 0000 473 S STATE ST 415 PROVO UT 84606-5098201 E 300 S 32382 16 06 179 016 0000 1816 11TH AVE SEATTLE WA 98122-201 S MAIN ST 32283 16 06 152 066 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-310419 E 200 S 32157 16 06 105 041 2000 175 S MAIN ST 610 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1966200 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 68089 16 06 127 022 0000 200 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-135518 S MAIN ST 17985 15 01 227 033 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119619 E 200 S 32158 16 06 105 041 2001 175 S MAIN ST 610 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1966185 S STATE ST 32199 16 06 108 014 0000 185 S STATE ST PH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-185 S STATE ST 32192 16 06 108 007 0000 185 S STATE ST PH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-185 S STATE ST 32196 16 06 108 011 0000 185 S STATE ST PH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-185 S STATE ST 32193 16 06 108 008 0000 185 S STATE ST PH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-185 S STATE ST 32189 16 06 108 004 0000 185 S STATE ST 1300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1537185 S STATE ST 32191 16 06 108 006 0000 185 S STATE ST PH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-185 S STATE ST 32188 16 06 108 003 0000 185 S STATE ST PH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-185 S STATE ST 32195 16 06 108 010 0000 185 S STATE ST PH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-185 S STATE ST 32187 16 06 108 002 0000 185 S STATE ST 1300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1537185 S STATE ST 32194 16 06 108 009 0000 185 S STATE ST PH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-185 S STATE ST 32190 16 06 108 005 0000 185 S STATE ST PH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-185 S STATE ST 32197 16 06 108 012 0000 185 S STATE ST PH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-180 W 400 S 18768 15 01 428 003 0000 175 S MAIN ST 610 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1966185 S STATE ST 32198 16 06 108 013 0000 185 S STATE ST PH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-179 W 300 S 71284 15 01 259 005 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-191717 E EXCHANGE PL 70632 16 06 301 037 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764178 S RIO GRANDE ST 73552 15 01 176 019 0000 90 S 400 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1284179 E SOCIAL HALL AVE 31967 16 06 102 017 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196175 W 200 S 77639 15 01 276 024 0000 175 S MAIN ST 610 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1966178 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 31961 16 06 102 007 0000 872 S WOODRUFF WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-1460175 S WEST TEMPLE ST 70391 15 01 229 071 0000 PO BOX 51298 IDAHO FALLS ID 83405-
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183ANDERSON INVESTMENT CORPCOMMUNITY FIRST NATIONAL BANKGATEWAY ASSOCIATES, LTDAXIS BUILDING ASSOCIATESEOS AT PARKSIDE LLCHPTWN PROPERTIES TRUSTANDERSON INVESTMENT CORPCW THE BIRDIE, LLCLEPAPILLON, LLC218 WEST QOZB, LLC200 WEST HOLDING, LCCOURTSIDE PLAZA LLCFIELDING GROUP, LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCJF LUXE PARTNERS II QOZB, LLCOCEAN PROPERTIES LTD; ET ALP.B.R. LLCP.B.R. LLCPRIME US-222 MAIN, LLCHENRIE'S UNION TAILORS &;DRY CLEANERS, INCSWEET CANDY COMPANY BUILDING,;LLC309 WEST LCANDERSON INVESTMENT;CORPORATIONSECOND EAST BUILDING LLCEOS AT PARKSIDE LLCCREF3 AP1 OWNER, LLCSECOND SOUTH HOTEL, LLCEDISON STREET PARTNERS LLCBROWNSTONE ASSOCIATES LLCPRICE-SOUTH TEMPLE COMPANYGREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF;GREATER SALT LAKEARTSPACE CITY CENTER, LLCROYAL WOOD ASSOCIATESMARYLEBONE LLCLIBRARY SQUARE CENTRE, LLCPHINDA, LLCBRIXTON LLCEOS AT PARKSIDE LLC231 W 400 S 18762 15 01 406 037 0000 205 HUDSON ST NEW YORK NY 10013-232 S FLORAL ST 68559 16 06 154 052 0000 PO BOX 28270 SANTA ANA CA 92799-8270231 E 400 S 33026 16 06 326 015 0000 231 E 400 S 380 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2831231 S EDISON ST 76967 16 06 176 027 0000 175 E 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1508230 W 200 S 17973 15 01 207 026 0000 PO BOX 738 GREAT FALLS MT 59403-0738230 W 400 S 18715 15 01 402 015 0000 176 N 2200 W 200 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116-2983230 S 300 W 18069 15 01 251 004 0000 279 S 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1703230 S 500 W 62645 15 01 152 008 0000 150 E VINE ST MURRAY UT 84107-483122 E 100 S 32141 16 06 105 024 0000 22 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1938230 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 32209 16 06 127 003 0000 230 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1205225 W 200 S 77853 15 01 254 026 0000 180 N UNIVERSITY AVE PROVO UT 84601-228 S EDISON ST 65403 16 06 154 050 0000 170 S MAIN ST 1600 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-3665225 S FLORAL ST 32312 16 06 154 034 0000 PO BOX 28270 SANTA ANA CA 92799-8270225 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18172 15 01 280 040 0000 2029 CENTURY PARK EA ST LOS ANGELES CA 90067-2901225 E 400 S 70051 16 06 326 019 0000 5455 W 11000 N 202 HIGHLAND UT 84003-225 S 200 E 32353 16 06 178 003 0000 225 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2437224 S 200 W 77854 15 01 254 027 0000 28128 PACIFIC COAST HWY MALIBU CA 90265-224 S 400 W 17908 15 01 179 007 0000 375 W 200 S 100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1205222 S MAIN ST 72379 15 01 280 065 0000 800 NEWPORT CENTER DR NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660-223 E 300 S 32383 16 06 179 017 0000 223 E BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2413221 W 400 S 18743 15 01 406 004 0000 221 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1824221 W 400 S 18744 15 01 406 005 0000 221 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1824220 S 200 E 32334 16 06 176 013 0000 1216 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014-220 S STATE ST 67146 16 06 152 078 0000 1000 MARKET ST 1 PORTSMOUTH NH 03801-21 N RIO GRANDE ST 77728 08 36 376 048 0000 35 N RIO GRANDE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-126021 S MAIN ST 76541 16 06 101 034 2003 7 WEST 7TH ST CINCINNATI OH 45202-218 W 300 S 18106 15 01 257 006 0000 254 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-180121 E EXCHANGE PL 70633 16 06 301 038 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764218 S 300 E 32365 16 06 178 016 0000 264 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-2001218 W 300 S 18108 15 01 257 009 0000 13858 S 7300 W HERRIMAN UT 84096-3825217 E 400 S 33024 16 06 326 013 0000 5455 W 11000 N 202 AMERICAN FORK UT 84003-8802218 S 200 E 32344 16 06 176 026 0000 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014-215 S STATE ST 68557 16 06 154 051 0000 PO BOX 28270 SANTA ANA CA 92799-8270215 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 17943 15 01 204 031 0000 ONE POST OFFICE SQUA BOSTON MA 02109-214 S 400 W 67363 15 01 179 017 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-3104215 S 200 W 77640 15 01 276 025 0000 175 S MAIN ST 610 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1966213 E 400 S 33023 16 06 326 012 0000 5455 W 11000 N 202 HIGHLAND UT 84003-213 S FLORAL ST 32309 16 06 154 029 0000 PO BOX 5155 SAN RAMON CA 94583-5155
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183ARTSPACE CITY CENTER, LLCJF LUXE PARTNERS QOZB, LLCFORD BUILDING SALT LAKE, LLCHOLY TRINITY GREEK ORTHODOX;CHURCHWEST RIVER, LLCBRIXTON LLCSOTIRIOU INVESTMENT GROUP LCJF LUXE PARTNERS QOZB, LLCPRIMA DONNA HOLDINGS LLCHP SALT LAKE CITY LLC257 EAST SALT LAKE LLCMURRELL, DAVID G, IV &;BECKERLE, MARY C; JTREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF;SALT LAKE CITYEXCHANGE PLAZA LLCJF LUXE PARTNERS QOZB, LLCUNICO 250 EAST 200 SOUTH;TOWER LLCSECOND SOUTH HOTEL, LLCPROPERTY RESERVE, INCBROADWAY EDEN LCJUSTESEN, REBEKAHSOTIRIOU INVESTMENT GROUP LCSOTIRIOU INVESTMENT GROUP LCPRICE SOUTH TEMPLE INVESTMENT,;LLCJF LUXE PARTNERS QOZB, LLCPOPLAR STREET PUB, LLCCITY CREEK ASSOCIATES, LLCMOONWORKS LLCG&M HOLDINGS, LLCAREVKAP, LLCMACARONI FLATS, LLCMT & K, LLCMARYLEBONE LLCMORTON JV TPIII LLCBRINSHORE UTAH, LLCSTUDIO ROW LLCEDISON STREET PARTNERS LLCDAHLE DEVELOPMENT, LLCKATSANEVAS ENTERPRISES INC248 S MAIN ST 61998 15 01 280 058 0000 6190 S STATE ST B MURRAY UT 84107-4079248 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 10367 08 36 452 019 0000 118 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-1118248 E 100 S 32252 16 06 129 033 0000 750 N 1250 W CENTERVILLE UT 84014-248 S EDISON ST 32318 16 06 154 045 0000 170 S MAIN ST 1600 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-3665245 S 200 E 32371 16 06 179 004 0000 524 SECOND AVE SEATTLE WA 98104-245 S STATE ST 76712 16 06 157 003 0000 666 DUNDEE RD NORTHBROOK IL 60062-244 S EDISON ST 32319 16 06 154 046 0000 750 N 1250 W CENTERVILLE UT 84014-244 W 400 S 18718 15 01 402 019 0000 9945 E POWDER RIDGE DR ALTA UT 84092-244 S 400 W 17910 15 01 179 009 0000 1906 E JEREMY DR MURRAY UT 84121-2169244 S 500 W 77168 15 01 152 024 0000 230 S 500 W 235 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1248243 E 400 S 33027 16 06 326 016 0000 243 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2803243 W 400 S 68689 15 01 405 024 0000 2375 E CREEK RD COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84093-6443242 S 200 W 76912 15 01 257 015 0000 242 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1801242 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 10368 08 36 452 020 0000 95 W 100 S 340 LOGAN UT 84321-242 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 32211 16 06 127 005 0000 230 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1205242 S 200 E 32338 16 06 176 017 0000 1148 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014-242 E 300 S 32394 16 06 181 002 0000 250 E 300 S 350 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-242 E 300 S 33054 16 06 328 027 0000 250 E 300 S 350 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-241 E 300 S 32385 16 06 179 019 0000 250 E 300 S 350 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-241 S RIO GRANDE ST 17905 15 01 179 003 0000 1450 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105-2047240 S POPLAR CT 18099 15 01 256 001 0000 180 N UNIVERSITY AVE PROVO UT 84601-240 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 10429 08 36 456 035 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196240 S 200 E 32337 16 06 176 016 0000 1148 W. LEGACY CROSSING B CENTERVILLE UT 84014-240 S 300 E 32376 16 06 179 010 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-239 S MAIN ST 63657 16 06 152 072 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-310423 E 400 S 32950 16 06 302 005 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764238 E 100 S 32250 16 06 129 031 0000 101 YGNACIO VALLEY RD WALNUT CREEK CA 94596-7018238 S EDISON ST 32308 16 06 154 019 0000 337 E ELEVENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-2802236 S 300 E 32375 16 06 179 009 0000 236 S 300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2502236 S MAIN ST 72378 15 01 280 066 0000 222 S MAIN ST 1760 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-2140236 E 300 S 32393 16 06 181 001 0000 250 E 300 S 350 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-236 S 200 E 32336 16 06 176 015 0000 1148 W. LEGACY CROSSING B CENTERVILLE UT 84014-235 S 400 W 17925 15 01 181 012 0000 187 N 100 E PRICE UT 84501-235 W 400 S 18742 15 01 406 001 0000 205 HUDSON ST NEW YORK NY 10013-234 S 400 W 17909 15 01 179 008 0000 30833 NORTHWESTERN HG HWY FARMINGTON HILLS MI 48334-234 W 300 S 18100 15 01 256 002 0000 279 S 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1703233 S 600 W 17872 15 01 151 006 0000 150 E VINE ST MURRAY UT 84107-4831234 S 200 E 32335 16 06 176 014 0000 1148 W. LEGACY CROSSING B CENTERVILLE UT 84014-
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183ETTORI INVESTMENTS LLCEXCHANGE PLACE GARAGEUNICO 250 EAST 200 SOUTH;TOWER LLCUNICO 250 EAST 200 SOUTH;TOWER LLCUNICO 250 EAST 200 SOUTH;TOWER LLCUNICO 250 EAST 200 SOUTH;TOWER LLCUNICO 250 EAST 200 SOUTH;TOWER LLCUNICO 250 EAST 200 SOUTH;TOWER LLCUNICO 250 EAST 200 SOUTH;TOWER LLCUNICO 250 EAST 200 SOUTH;TOWER LLCUNICO 250 EAST 200 SOUTH TOWER;LLCSOTIRIOU INVESTMENT GROUP LCLARKIN MORTUARYJF LUXE PARTNERS QOZB, LLCHANSSEN & HANSSEN PROPERTIES,;INCPAINLESS PARKING LLCKATSANEVAS ENTERPRISES INCAWESOME COUGARS LLCHANSSEN & HANSSEN PROPERTIES,;INCAWESOME COUGARS LLC200 WEST HOLDING, LCGATES BROTHERS LLCFUTURE 500 HOLDINGS COMPANY,;LLCLIN FAMILY HPJ, LLCBRINSHORE UTAH, LLCRLH PARTNERSHIP II LPBERNOLFO, DAVID W; ET ALWADE, LLOYD W & GWENIVERE F;;JTJF LUXE PARTNERS QOZB, LLC257 EAST SALT LAKE LLCDIAMOND PARKING INCDIAMOND PARKING INCJF LUXE PARTNERS QOZB, LLCDIAMOND PARKING INCGATEWAY ASSOCIATES. LTDBV LOTUS REPUBLIC, LLCLARKIN MORTUARYCAMPANIA HOLDINGS, LLCPRISKOS, VASILIOS260 S MAIN ST 18182 15 01 280 054 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764260 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 32219 16 06 127 014 0000 260 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1205260 S 200 W 18111 15 01 257 012 0000 725 E 200 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010-25 N RIO GRANDE ST 77730 08 36 376 050 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-310425 S 300 E 32225 16 06 128 005 0000 PO BOX 51298 IDAHO FALLS ID 83405-1298258 S 200 E 32341 16 06 176 020 0000 1148 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014-259 S 200 W 18143 15 01 277 023 0000 605 FIRST AV 600 SEATTLE WA 98104-257 S 200 W 18130 15 01 277 003 0000 605 FIRST AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98104-257 S 200 W 18129 15 01 277 002 0000 605 FIRST AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98104-256 S 200 E 32340 16 06 176 019 0000 1148 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014-257 E 200 S 32247 16 06 129 028 0000 101 YGNACIO VALLEY RD WALNUT CREEK CA 94596-7018255 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 17940 15 01 204 026 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917256 E 300 S 32396 16 06 181 004 0000 2679 E LAMBOURNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109-2742255 S STATE ST 76710 16 06 157 001 0000 666 DUNDEE RD NORTHBROOK IL 60062-255 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18178 15 01 280 050 0000 1775 TYSONS BLVD 7TH FLR MCLEAN VA 22102-4285254 W 400 S 18714 15 01 402 013 0000 254 W 400 S FL-2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-255 E 400 S 77688 16 06 328 029 0000 255 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2810254 S 200 W 18110 15 01 257 011 0000 254 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1801254 S 300 E 32379 16 06 179 013 0000 364 N 750 E HYDE PARK UT 84318-3347252 S 300 E 32378 16 06 179 012 0000 250 S 300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2502252 S EDISON ST 32315 16 06 154 039 0000 252 S EDISON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2307250 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 10366 08 36 452 018 0000 118 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-1118251 S FLORAL ST 32317 16 06 154 042 0000 252 S EDISON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2307250 S 300 E 32377 16 06 179 011 0000 250 S 300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2502250 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18145 15 01 277 025 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917250 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 32212 16 06 127 007 0000 260 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1205250 S 200 E 32339 16 06 176 018 0000 1148 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014-250 E 200 S 32389 16 06 179 028 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-250 E 300 S 32395 16 06 181 003 0000 250 E 300 S 350 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-250 E 200 S 32360 16 06 178 010 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-250 E 200 S 32361 16 06 178 011 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-250 E 200 S 32358 16 06 178 008 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-250 E 200 S 32359 16 06 178 009 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-250 E 200 S 32357 16 06 178 007 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-250 E 200 S 32356 16 06 178 006 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-250 E 200 S 32366 16 06 178 017 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-250 E 200 S 32355 16 06 178 005 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-249 E 400 S 33039 16 06 328 012 0000 352 S MOFFATT CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-280524 E 300 S 66887 16 06 153 011 0000 222 S MAIN ST 1760 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-2140
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183FUTURE 500 HOLDINGS COMPANY,;LLC261 PLACE LLCRUCKER FAMILY PROPERTIES LLCGLOBAL CONSULTING;INTERNATIONAL, INC.BANDALOOPS LLCOASIS GAMES LLCR & D FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLCJUSTESEN, GARY KHENDRIKS REAL ESTATE, LLCMRK FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPRAVEN ONE LLCWORTHINGTON TPIII, LLCBRINSHORE UTAH, LLCBERNOLFO, DAVID W; ET ALCHRISTENSON BROS PROPERTY LLCALDK SLC, LLCSOTIRIOU INVESTMENT GROUP LCCHRISTENSON BROS PROPERTY LLCFORD BUILDING SALT LAKE, LLCAJ'S KWIK MART LLCCELTIC BANK CORPORATIONCELTIC BANK CORPORATIONCELTIC BANK CORPORATIONHENDRIKS REAL ESTATE, LLCPROPERTY RESERVE INCCOMMERCIAL CLUB BUILDING LLCODD FELLOWS GROUP, LLCGLOBAL CONSULTING;INTERNATIONAL INCLOGICAL PROPERTIES, LLCMRK FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPDTOWN 275 LLCOASIS GAMES LLCCOLUMBIA DEVELOPMENT;CORPORATION172 WEST 300 SOUTH, LLCCORNER 64, LLC3RD & 3RD LLCBNOLLCFORD BUILDING SALT LAKE, LLCALDK SLC, LLC280 S 400 W 17911 15 01 179 010 0000 30833 NORTHWESTERN HG HWY FARMINGTON HILLS MI 48334-285 W 300 S 65242 15 01 258 011 0000 566 W LAKE ST CHICAGO IL 60661-279 E 300 S 77154 16 06 179 029 0000 151 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102-1906279 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 17931 15 01 204 001 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764275 S 200 W 62661 15 01 277 028 0000 PO BOX 2406 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110-2406276 W 100 S 71272 15 01 204 040 0000 19 E 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1905275 E 400 S 33045 16 06 328 018 0000 275 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2810275 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 13941 09 31 383 009 0000 2225 E MURRAY HOLLADAY RD HOLLADAY UT 84117-5309274 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 10379 08 36 452 016 0000 118 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-1118275 E 200 S 78174 16 06 177 010 0000 4655 S 2300 E HOLLADAY UT 84117-4589270 E 100 S 32233 16 06 129 008 0000 270 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1605270 S MAIN ST 66125 15 01 280 059 0000 1863 WAZEE ST DENVER CO 80202-26 E EXCHANGE PL 32948 16 06 302 003 0000 1961 S LA CIENEGA BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90034-26 W MARKET ST 75498 15 01 430 019 0000 26 W MARKET ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-2103268 W 400 S 18711 15 01 402 010 0000 268 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1823269 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 62482 08 36 456 036 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196268 S STATE ST 69923 16 06 156 010 0000 268 S STATE ST 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-5314268 S STATE ST 69924 16 06 156 011 0000 268 S STATE ST 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-5314268 S MAIN ST 71285 15 01 280 064 0000 PO BOX 25531 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84125-0531268 S STATE ST 69925 16 06 156 012 0000 268 S STATE ST 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-5314268 S 200 E 32343 16 06 176 022 0000 PO BOX 17282 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117-0282268 S 400 W 17906 15 01 179 004 0000 30833 NORTHWESTERN HG HWY FARMINGTON HILLS MI 48334-267 W 300 S 71283 15 01 258 013 0000 566 W LAKE ST CHICAGO IL 60661-268 E 300 S 32397 16 06 181 005 0000 250 E 300 S 350 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-265 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 17939 15 01 204 025 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917266 S 200 E 32342 16 06 176 021 0000 PO BOX 17282 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117-0282265 S 200 E 32373 16 06 179 007 0000 1816 11TH AVE SEATTLE WA 98122-265 S STATE ST 76711 16 06 157 002 0000 666 DUNDEE RD NORTHBROOK IL 60062-264 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 10365 08 36 452 017 0000 118 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-1118265 E 100 S 75670 16 06 127 027 0000 PO BOX 4902 JACKSON WY 83001-4902263 S RIO GRANDE ST 17907 15 01 179 005 0000 249 S RIO GRANDE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1105264 W 400 S 18712 15 01 402 011 0000 268 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84025-263 E 400 S 77687 16 06 328 030 0000 275 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2810263 S POPLAR CT 18104 15 01 257 004 0000 PO BOX 712020 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84171-2020262 E 100 S 32248 16 06 129 029 0000 270 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1605262 S MAIN ST 18165 15 01 280 030 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764261 E 300 S 32388 16 06 179 027 0000 376 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2909261 S 300 E 32411 16 06 182 013 0000 990 S 500 W WOODS CROSS UT 84087-260 W 400 S 18713 15 01 402 012 0000 254 W 400 S FL-2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183EXCHANGE PLACE GARAGEPROPERTY RESERVE INCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCWASATCH PLAZA HOLDINGS, LLCASSOCIATED TRAVEL SERVICES INCLIBERTAS LLCZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANKCITY CREEK RESERVE, INCGATEWAY HP, LLCGATEWAY ASSOCIATES LTDGREYHOUND LINES INCREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT;LAKE CITYLARRY H MILLER ARENA CORPREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT;LAKE CITYPRIER REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS,;LLCPAINLESS PARKING, LLCRUCKER, FREDCRANE ASSOCIATES, LCPILONEX, LLCPILONEX, LLCPILONEX, LLCPILONEX, LLCPILONEX, LLCPILONEX, LLCPILONEX, LLCPILONEX, LLCMCINTYRE, BRADYPILONEX, LLCPILONEX, LLCNORTH TEMPLE ENTERPRISES, LLCNAF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP42/43 LLC310 SOUTH MAIN LLC311 STATE LLCBERNOLFO, DAVID WSJD 312 EAST LLC; 25%;PRICE 312 EAST, LLC; 75%AHC, L.L.C.204 BROADWAY, LLC314 W 300 S 18075 15 01 252 005 0000 3684 E KAIBAB CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109-2309315 S 200 E 33012 16 06 326 001 0000 347 CONGRESS ST BOSTON MA 02210-311 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18187 15 01 281 002 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917312 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 71663 16 06 128 010 0000 230 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1205310 S MAIN ST 18192 15 01 281 010 0000 2863 N NORWALK MESA AZ 85215-1133311 S STATE ST 32323 16 06 155 001 0000 160 GREENTREE DR DOVER DE 19904-7620309 E 400 S 77689 16 06 329 010 0000 311 S WACKER DR CHICAGO IL 60606-30 E 300 S 66886 16 06 153 010 0000 51 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2711308 W 300 S 64934 15 01 260 006 0000 PO BOX 655 SPRINGVILLE UT 84663-308 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 77820 08 36 451 012 0000 1153 S 3600 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104-6508308 W 300 S 64930 15 01 260 002 0000 308 W 300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-308 W 300 S 64939 15 01 260 010 0000 PO BOX 655 SPRINGVILLE UT 84663-308 W 300 S 64940 15 01 260 011 0000 PO BOX 655 SPRINGVILLE UT 84663-308 W 300 S 64932 15 01 260 004 0000 PO BOX 655 SPRINGVILLE UT 84663-308 W 300 S 64935 15 01 260 007 0000 PO BOX 655 SPRINGVILLE UT 84663-308 W 300 S 64933 15 01 260 005 0000 PO BOX 655 SPRINGVILLE UT 84663-308 W 300 S 64936 15 01 260 008 0000 PO BOX 655 SPRINGVILLE UT 84663-308 W 300 S 64938 15 01 260 009 0000 PO BOX 655 SPRINGVILLE UT 84663-307 W PIERPONT AVE 64929 15 01 260 001 0000 PO BOX 655 SPRINGVILLE UT 84663-308 W 300 S 64931 15 01 260 003 0000 PO BOX 655 SPRINGVILLE UT 84663-307 E 300 S 32412 16 06 182 016 0000 990 S 500 W WOODS CROSS UT 84087-307 W 200 S 18068 15 01 251 003 0000 307 W 200 S 4001 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1273304 E 200 S 32399 16 06 182 001 0000 13 PARADISE COVE ALPINE UT 84004-1961306 S WEST TEMPLE ST 66123 15 01 279 006 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917301 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 78170 15 01 127 017 2001 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1219301 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 78171 15 01 127 017 6001 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1219300 S 600 W 73551 15 01 109 006 6001 PO BOX 80615 INDIANAPOLIS IN 46280-0615301 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 78169 15 01 127 017 2000 PO BOX 145518 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114-55182 S 400 W 68806 08 36 376 016 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK RD PHOENIX AZ 85016-2 S RIO GRANDE ST 77723 08 36 376 043 0000 101 S 200 E 200 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-310729 W 100 S 18032 15 01 229 054 0000 PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTON KY 40555-428829 W 400 S 18823 15 01 432 007 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119629 E 400 S 32951 16 06 302 006 0000 10706 S OZARKS DR SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009-569329 S STATE ST 32096 16 06 103 150 0000 29 S STATE ST 007 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-152128 S STATE ST 76543 16 06 101 034 2005 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196299 S MAIN ST 63661 16 06 152 075 0000 595 S RIVERWOODS PKY 400 LOGAN UT 84321-28 E 300 S 32932 16 06 301 008 0000 222 S MAIN ST 1760 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-214028 N 400 W 9750 08 36 377 016 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183LAZY B RANCH I, INC.LEDALO LLCGARDINER PROPERTIES;PIERPONT LLCDV-PARAGON LP1169 LLCCHENZO, LLCBEEHIVE STATE BUILDING, LLCEXCHANGE PLACE GARAGEPH UTAH LLCPH UTAH LLCPH UTAH LLCPH UTAH LLCIGL PROPERTIES, LLCBIGGER D INVESTMENTS L.L.C.WICKSON, LLCLEDALO LLCNORITA II ASSOCIATES, LC323 LLCWICKSON, LLCDADS5GIRLS, LLC324 SLC INVESTORS, LLC; 5%;324 SLC INVESTORS, LLC; 95%325 LLCAP 325-331 W PIERPONT AVE,;LLC326 WEST TEMPLE, LLCFRANKS & ASSOCIATED, LCARENA 327 LLCARENA 327 LLC328 VENTURES, LLCMCE INVESTMENTS LLCMAXWELL, STEVEN MEXCHANGE PLACE GARAGECOMMERCIAL CLUB BUILDING LLCCOMMERCIAL CLUB BUILDING LLC200 SOUTH MAIN STREET;INVESTORS LLCPH UTAH LLC330 WEST TEMPLE, LLCSALUTATION LLCIGL PROPERTIES, LLC331 S MAIN ST 32931 16 06 301 006 0000 217 BIRMINGHAM LN NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054-331 S RIO GRANDE ST 71231 15 01 327 017 0000 PO BOX 684304 PARK CITY UT 84068-330 S 300 E 63647 16 06 328 028 0000 77 GRACE ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103-330 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18764 15 01 427 005 0000 1369 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-255732 E EXCHANGE PL 32952 16 06 302 007 0000 1961 S LA CIENEGA BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90034-32 W 200 S 18037 15 01 229 060 0000 PO BOX 1368 CARLSBAD CA 92018-32 E 300 S 32933 16 06 301 009 0000 222 S MAIN ST 1760 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-214032 E EXCHANGE PL 32949 16 06 302 004 0000 1961 S LA CIENEGA BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90034-328 W 200 S 73476 15 01 132 058 0000 328 W 200 S 100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1229328 W 200 S 73477 15 01 132 059 0000 328 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1210327 W 200 S 66085 15 01 261 004 0000 327 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1211328 S STATE ST 75389 16 06 301 040 0000 569 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-1306327 S MAIN ST 32930 16 06 301 005 0000 12 W MARKET ST 270 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-2138327 W 200 S 66082 15 01 261 001 0000 327 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1211325 W PIERPONT AVE 18071 15 01 252 001 0000 1616 CAMDEN RD CHARLOTTE NC 28203-326 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18763 15 01 427 004 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917324 S STATE ST 66309 16 06 301 032 0000 700 MEADOW LANE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55422-325 S MAIN ST 32929 16 06 301 004 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764323 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18791 15 01 430 002 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917324 S 400 W 18599 15 01 327 004 0000 1137 ROBYN WAY FARMINGTON UT 84025-322 S MAIN ST 18806 15 01 430 017 0000 12 W MARKET ST 270 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-2138323 S MAIN ST 32928 16 06 301 003 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764321 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18790 15 01 430 001 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917321 W 400 S 18723 15 01 404 001 0000 434 S 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1705320 S 400 W 61994 15 01 180 003 0000 PO BOX 684304 PARK CITY UT 84068-320 W 200 S 75356 15 01 129 035 0000 320 W 200 S FL-3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-320 S 300 E 33032 16 06 327 004 0000 77 GRACE ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103-320 S 300 E 33033 16 06 327 005 0000 77 GRACE ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103-320 S 300 E 33030 16 06 327 002 0000 77 GRACE ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103-320 S 300 E 33031 16 06 327 003 0000 77 GRACE ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103-31 E 400 S 32953 16 06 302 008 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-276431 E EXCHANGE PL 66883 16 06 301 036 0000 222 S MAIN ST 1760 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-2140317 S MAIN ST 32926 16 06 301 001 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2764319 S MAIN ST 32927 16 06 301 002 0000 319 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2702315 W PIERPONT AVE 77686 15 01 252 007 0000 1075 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106-2349316 W 200 S 71842 15 01 129 031 0000 960 N SAN ANTONIO RD LOS ALTOS CA 94022-315 S MAIN ST 32292 16 06 153 002 0000 1413 W 13200 S RIVERTON UT 84065-6132315 W 400 S 18724 15 01 404 002 0000 434 S 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1705
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183IGL PROPERTIES, LLCAP 325-331 W PIERPONT AVE,;LLCROGERS, RICHARD B;;ETALGW PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, LCDEPOMAX PROPERTIES HOLDINGS;LLC333 SOUTH STATE LLCNORITA II ASSOCIATES, LC330 WEST TEMPLE, LLCLOLA HOLDINGS LLCNEW YORK LIMITED;PARTNERSHIPBARBARA'S COLLEGE, LLCBINGHMAN BROTHERS PARTNERSHIPBINGHAM BROTHERS PARTNERSHIPWEST RIVER, LLCBINGHAM BROTHERS PARTNERSHIPWESTGATE DESIGN, L.L.C.BINGHAM BROTHERS PARTNERSHIPBINGHAM BROTHERS PARTNERSHIPWEST RIVER, LLCWESTGATE DESIGN, L.L.C.BINGHAM BROTHERS PARTNERSHIPROGERS, RICHARD B;;ETAL328 VENTURES, LLCFIELDING GROUP, LLCZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK NAARTSPACE AFFORDABLE HOUSING,;LLCELEVATION CAPITAL, LLCDOWNTOWN 360, LLC298 ALABAMA LLCSIAL, ALTAF HSTAY STOKED PROPERTIES, LLCMOONWORKS LLCPROPERTY RESERVE, INC298 ALABAMA, LLCSLC 345 WEST OWNER LLCMOONWORKS LLC298 ALABAMA LLCSTAY STOKED PROPERTIES, LLCETTORI INVESTMENTS LLC348 S MOFFATT CT 33036 16 06 328 009 0000 352 S MOFFATT CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2805347 S MOFFATT CT 33041 16 06 328 014 0000 77 GRACE ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103-347 W 400 S 18620 15 01 330 005 0000 378 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1846345 W 100 S 76896 15 01 129 040 0000 PO BOX A3956 CHICAGO IL 60690-3956346 S MOFFATT CT 33035 16 06 328 008 0000 243 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2803344 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 9673 08 36 329 007 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196345 S MOFFATT CT 33040 16 06 328 013 0000 77 GRACE ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103-2683343 W 400 S 18621 15 01 330 006 0000 378 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1846344 S MOFFATT CT 33034 16 06 328 007 0000 243 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2803342 S 300 E 33048 16 06 328 021 0000 77 GRACE ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103-2683342 S STATE ST 32938 16 06 301 020 0000 777 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-3821341 S MAIN ST 32941 16 06 301 024 0000 341 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2702341 S RIO GRANDE ST 18601 15 01 327 006 0000 8901 GAYLORD DR 100 HOUSTON TX 77024-304233 W 100 S 18011 15 01 229 007 0000 PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTON KY 40555-4288340 W PIERPONT AVE 17924 15 01 181 011 0000 230 S 500 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1129338 S STATE ST 75390 16 06 301 041 0000 569 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-130633 N RIO GRANDE ST 77725 08 36 376 045 0000 35 N RIO GRANDE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1260336 W 300 S 70481 15 01 186 004 0000 1658 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105-2828338 S SHELMERDINE CT 33022 16 06 326 011 0000 315 W HUENEME ROAD CAMARILLO CA 93012-336 W 300 S 70479 15 01 186 002 0000 187 N 100 E PRICE UT 84501-336 W 300 S 70486 15 01 186 009 0000 1525 E WESTMORELAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105-2722336 W 300 S 70484 15 01 186 007 0000 1658 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105-2828336 W 300 S 70482 15 01 186 005 0000 1658 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105-2828336 W 300 S 70480 15 01 186 003 0000 1658 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105-2828336 W 300 S 70487 15 01 186 010 0000 1525 E WESTMORELAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105-2722336 W 300 S 70485 15 01 186 008 0000 1658 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105-2828336 W 300 S 70478 15 01 186 001 0000 187 N 100 E PRICE UT 84501-336 S 400 W 18600 15 01 327 005 0000 1225 DEER VALLEY DR 201 PARK CITY UT 84060-336 W 300 S 70483 15 01 186 006 0000 1658 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105-2828335 S 200 W 67792 15 01 403 005 0000 388 N MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-1635335 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18792 15 01 430 004 0000 744 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102-2902334 S MAIN ST 18807 15 01 430 018 0000 12 W MARKET ST 270 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-2138334 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18765 15 01 427 006 0000 1369 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-2557333 S RIO GRANDE ST 67670 15 01 327 013 0000 9134 S WILLIAMSBURG CT WEST JORDAN UT 84088-6419333 S STATE ST 75387 16 06 305 030 0000 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY 400 LOGAN UT 84321-6845332 S SHELMERDINE CT 33021 16 06 326 010 0000 315 W HUENEME ROAD CAMARILLO CA 93012-333 S 300 E 33056 16 06 329 002 0000 412 N OLD OAK RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-1685331 S RIO GRANDE ST 67673 15 01 327 012 0000 PO BOX 684304 PARK CITY UT 84068-331 W PIERPONT AVE 17926 15 01 182 001 0000 1616 CAMDEN RD CHARLOTTE NC 28203-
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183ETTORI INVESTMENTS LLCWOOD PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLCTHORNHILL, CURTIS; TR;(CT LIV TRUST)MC METRO, LLCMC METRO, LLCMOONWORKS LLCROMNEY VENTURES LLCPEG SLC 360 SOUTH, LLC358 LLCAXIOM PROPERTIES, LLCAXIOM PROPERTIES, LLCETTORI INVESTMENTS LLCPEG SLC 360 SOUTH LLCLIBRARY SQUARE ANNEX, LLC1400 WEST ASSOCIATES, LLC358 LLCNEST@RIOGRANDE, LLCBOYER 500 WEST LCGRIT PROPERTIES, LLCPETERSEN, ERICPLANET SOFTWARE, LLCPLANET SOFTWARE, LLCPURNHAGEN PROPERTIES, LLCUTP PRODUCTIONS, INC.D N A LAND HOLDINGS GROUP LLCD N A LAND HOLDINGS GROUP LLCD N A LAND HOLDINGS GROUP LLCSTERLING PARTNERS LLCSTERLING PARTNERS LLCSTERLING PARTNERS LLCSTERLING PARTNERS LLCUTP PRODUCTIONS, INC.H&M ELITE INTERNATIONAL;CONSULTING LLCGRIT PROPERTIES, LLCSIAL, IQBALEVEREN T BROWN 360 IMAGES,;LLCTELEGRAPH EXCHANGE, LLCPARRISH PLACE VENTURES LLCPARRISH PLACE VENTURES LLC360 W 300 S 75262 15 01 187 094 0000 950 W SHEPARD CHURCH DR FARMINGTON UT 84025-360 W 300 S 75263 15 01 187 095 0000 950 W SHEPARD CHURCH DR FARMINGTON UT 84025-360 S WEST TEMPLE ST 76918 15 01 428 024 0000 360 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1911360 W 200 S 71840 15 01 129 029 0000 732 E NORTHCREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-331735 W 300 S 77857 15 01 285 042 0000 35 W 300 S 102A SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-360 S STATE ST 32957 16 06 303 005 0000 1207 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-453135 W 300 S 73430 15 01 285 039 0000 35 W BROADWAY ST 201A SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-35 W 300 S 77856 15 01 285 041 0000 35 W 300 S 102 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-35 W 300 S 73404 15 01 285 013 0000 111 E SEGO LILY DR 400 SANDY UT 84070-442235 W 300 S 73405 15 01 285 014 0000 111 E SEGO LILY DR 400 SANDY UT 84070-442235 W 300 S 73402 15 01 285 011 0000 111 E SEGO LILY DR 400 SANDY UT 84070-442235 W 300 S 73403 15 01 285 012 0000 111 E SEGO LILY DR 400 SANDY UT 84070-442235 W 300 S 73400 15 01 285 009 0000 35 W BROADWAY ST 203 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-218835 W 300 S 73401 15 01 285 010 0000 35 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-200435 W 300 S 73398 15 01 285 007 0000 35 W BROADWAY ST 201A SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-35 W 300 S 73399 15 01 285 008 0000 35 W BROADWAY ST 203 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-218835 W 300 S 73396 15 01 285 005 0000 35 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-200435 W 300 S 73397 15 01 285 006 0000 3995 S 2000 E HOLLADAY UT 84124-173935 W 300 S 73394 15 01 285 003 0000 6228 E BRIGHAM FORK CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-361235 W 300 S 73395 15 01 285 004 0000 35 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-200435 S 600 W 72318 15 01 102 007 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-310435 W 300 S 73392 15 01 285 001 0000 35 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-2004358 S 300 E 33051 16 06 328 024 0000 7862 S DANISH DOWNES CT COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121-5783358 S RIO GRANDE ST 18595 15 01 326 002 0000 7233 PURPLE SAGE PARK CITY UT 84098-357 S 200 E 33017 16 06 326 006 0000 231 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2830357 W 200 S 17920 15 01 181 002 0000 573 W STATE ST PLEASANT GROVE UT 84062-352 S MOFFATT CT 33038 16 06 328 011 0000 352 S MOFFATT CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2805355 S 200 W 18767 15 01 428 002 0000 180 N UNIVERSITY AVE PROVO UT 84601-351 W 400 S 18619 15 01 330 004 0000 351 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1707351 W 400 S 18618 15 01 330 003 0000 351 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1707351 S 200 W 62679 15 01 428 023 0000 180 N UNIVERSITY AVE PROVO UT 84601-351 S MOFFATT CT 33043 16 06 328 016 0000 7862 S DANISH DOWNES CT COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121-5783350 S MOFFATT CT 33037 16 06 328 010 0000 243 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2803350 W PIERPONT AVE 69514 15 01 184 101 0000 2265 E MURRAY HOLLADAY RD HOLLADAY UT 84117-5379350 S 200 E 73254 16 06 310 002 0000 525 LOVELL RD KNOXVILLE TN 37932-350 S 200 E 73253 16 06 310 001 0000 525 LOVELL RD KNOXVILLE TN 37932-350 S 200 E 73256 16 06 310 004 0000 720 WESTFIELD RD ALPINE UT 84004-350 S 200 E 73255 16 06 310 003 0000 350 S 200 E 104 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2469349 S MOFFATT CT 33042 16 06 328 015 0000 352 S MOFFATT CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2805
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183PARRISH PLACE VENTURES LLCPARRISH PLACE VENTURES LLCPARRISH PLACE VENTURES LLCPARRISH PLACE VENTURES LLCAXIOM PROPERTIES, LLCOASIS GAMES LLCNEST@RIOGRANDE, LLCREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT;LAKE CITYREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT;LAKE CITYCITY CREEK RESERVE INCCHURCH & STATE BUSINESS;CENTER LLCPANTELAKIS, TERRY S &;BESSIE B; TRSANDERSON INVESTMENT CORPHEB SALT LAKE PROPERTIES LLCUPG CITY CENTRE PARKING;PROPERTY OWNER, LLC309 WEST LCWAGNER PROSTHETIC;MANUFACTURING CO, INCBILL & CAROL BENGTZEN LLCTHE OLIVE QOZB LLCPIONEER 66 INCCORP OF PRESIDING BISHOP OF CH;OF JC OF LDSZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK NAZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK NABAY PACIFIC AMERICAN PLAZA II;LLC370 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE LLCUC SALT LAKE, LLCGUTIERREZ, JUAN &;DODSON, RINA; JTNEST@RIOGRANDE, LLC200 SOUTH MAIN STREET;INVESTORS LLCSCAP 9 LLC400 MAZIK LLCVENTURE 404 WEST LCWASATCH PLAZA HOLDINGS II, LLCPROPERTY RESERVE, INCINTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT &;DEVELOPMENT CORPCORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDSODD FELLOWS GROUP, LLC40 W MARKET ST 77236 15 01 430 020 0000 26 W MARKET ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-210340 E 300 S 32295 16 06 153 005 0000 4505 S WASATCH BLVD 215 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124-470740 N 200 W 11135 08 36 478 007 0000 50 E NORTHTEMPLE FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150-405 S MAIN ST 32975 16 06 306 001 0000 595 S RIVERWOODS PKY 400 LOGAN UT 84321-40 E 100 S 32164 16 06 106 004 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196404 S 300 W 18725 15 01 404 003 0000 1000 S MAIN ST 104 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-3175404 W 400 S 70980 15 01 327 016 0000 404 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-110838 W 200 S 18039 15 01 229 062 0000 PO BOX 1368 CARLSBAD CA 92018-39 E EXCHANGE PL 32935 16 06 301 014 0000 7170 E MCDONALD DR 4 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85253-5424380 W 200 S 64789 15 01 183 005 0000 380 W 200 S 203 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-4201382 S RIO GRANDE ST 18597 15 01 326 004 0000 7233 PURPLE SAGE PARK CITY UT 84098-380 S WEST TEMPLE ST 76919 15 01 428 026 0000 11 PARK PL NEW YORK NY 12207-380 W 200 S 64786 15 01 183 002 0000 39 E EAGLE RIDGE DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054-37 W 100 S 18015 15 01 229 013 0000 PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTON KY 40555-428837 W 200 S 18179 15 01 280 051 0000 2001 UNION ST,SUITE 300 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94123-37 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 13375 09 31 352 006 0000 50 E NORTHTEMPLE FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150-37 W 100 S 18010 15 01 229 006 0000 PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTON KY 40555-4288378 W 300 S 17927 15 01 182 002 0000 1095 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106-2349379 S 300 W 18710 15 01 402 009 0000 379 S 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1704375 W 400 S 18616 15 01 330 001 0000 3212 E DEER HOLLOW DR SANDY UT 84092-4515377 W 100 S 17859 15 01 129 001 0000 377 W 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1209375 S STATE ST 75388 16 06 305 031 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE SEATTLE WA 98161-375 W 200 S 17919 15 01 181 001 0000 375 W 200 S 100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1205375 S 200 E 33028 16 06 326 017 0000 5455 W 11000 N 202 HIGHLAND UT 84003-375 S 300 W 66896 15 01 402 023 0000 375 S 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1704370 S 300 E 33053 16 06 328 026 0000 370 S 300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2504370 S STATE ST 32958 16 06 303 006 0000 3125 E KENNEDY DR 101 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-2169365 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 78173 15 01 127 018 6001 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-121936 S STATE ST 75879 16 06 101 033 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196365 S 500 W 70469 15 01 326 006 0000 7233 PURPLE SAGE PARK CITY UT 84098-365 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 78172 15 01 127 018 2000 PO BOX 145518 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114-5518361 W 400 S 18617 15 01 330 002 0000 351 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1707362 S 300 E 33052 16 06 328 025 0000 275 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2810360 W 300 S 75266 15 01 187 098 0000 950 W SHEPARD CHURCH DR FARMINGTON UT 84025-360 W 300 S 75267 15 01 187 099 0000 950 W SHEPARD CHURCH DR FARMINGTON UT 84025-360 W 300 S 75264 15 01 187 096 0000 950 W SHEPARD CHURCH DR FARMINGTON UT 84025-360 W 300 S 75265 15 01 187 097 0000 950 W SHEPARD CHURCH DR FARMINGTON UT 84025-
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183CITY CREEK RESERVE, INC1051 SOUTH 300 WEST, LCSCAP 9 LLCFIELDING GROUP, LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE, INCWIFCO LCURBAN SUITES MANAGEMENT, LLCGCII INVESTMENTS LCVESTAR GATEWAY, LLCVESTAR GATEWAY, LLCVESTAR GATEWAY, LLCTHE INN GROUP, LLC42EP LLCGATEWAY ASSOCIATES, LTDMCDLA, LLCBERNOLFO, DAVID W; ET ALBCAL GATEWAY PROPERTY LLCVESTAR GATEWAY, LLCVESTAR GATEWAY, LLCVESTAR GATEWAY, LLCVESTAR GATEWAY, LLCJUSTESEN, REBEKAHCONVERT2MEDIA LLCBV LOTUS REPUBLIC, LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCS K HART PROPERTIES L CS K HART PROPERTIES L CS K HART PROPERTIES L CPACKAGING CORPORATION OF;AMERICADAKOTA PACIFIC REGENT, LLCEXCHANGE PLAZA LLCSCAP 9 LLCCW THE BEVERLY, LLCBERNOLFO, DAVID W; ET ALCITY CREEK RESERVE INCBCAL GATEWAY PROPERTY LLCBEEHIVE SPUDS PARTNERS LLC46 S 600 W 62635 15 01 104 005 0000 74 S 600 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-100645 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 75898 15 01 227 062 2007 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196460 W 50 N 76871 08 36 376 041 0000 90 S 400 W 570 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-137245 S 600 W 17810 15 01 105 001 0000 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014-45 W 300 S 18189 15 01 281 004 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-191745 E 400 S 32955 16 06 303 003 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-276445 E EXCHANGE PL 66308 16 06 301 031 0000 7170 E MCDONALD DR 4 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85253-5424455 W 400 S 18604 15 01 329 003 0000 P.O BOX 80615 INDIANAPOLIS IN 46280-45 E 200 S 32261 16 06 151 006 0000 299 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-194144 W 300 S 18206 15 01 283 002 0000 PO BOX 11623 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84147-062344 W 300 S 18207 15 01 283 003 0000 PO BOX 11623 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84147-062344 W 100 S 75899 15 01 227 062 2008 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119644 W 300 S 18208 15 01 283 004 0000 PO BOX 11623 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84147-062344 S 300 E 32220 16 06 127 015 0000 PO BOX 51298 IDAHO FALLS ID 83405-129844 W 100 S 75900 15 01 227 062 2009 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196442 W 300 S 17912 15 01 179 011 0000 1450 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105-204744 E EXCHANGE PL 32963 16 06 303 014 0000 358 S 700 E B147 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102-441 W 100 S 71225 15 01 177 014 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85016-441 W 100 S 68786 15 01 177 003 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85016-441 W 100 S 69823 15 01 177 012 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85016-441 W 100 S 68791 15 01 177 008 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85016-43 W 300 S 18190 15 01 281 005 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917440 W 200 S 71224 15 01 177 013 0000 90 S 400 W 570 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1372430 W 50 N 76794 08 36 376 040 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-3104435 W 400 S 18605 15 01 329 004 0000 1335 S COLONIAL CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-2202425 S 300 W 18741 15 01 405 023 0000 2733 E PARLEYS WY 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109-166142 E EXCHANGE PL 32960 16 06 303 008 0000 42 E EXCHANGE PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2713424 W 100 S 68795 15 01 131 002 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85016-424 W 100 S 68796 15 01 131 003 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85016-424 S 765 W 69739 15 02 428 032 0000 3200 S HIGHLAND DR MILLCREEK UT 84106-3090424 W 100 S 68800 15 01 131 007 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85016-420 S 500 W 18587 15 01 303 010 0000 1947 E ST MARYS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-2245423 W 300 S 61993 15 01 180 002 0000 423 W 300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-41 N RIO GRANDE ST 77727 08 36 376 047 0000 35 N RIO GRANDE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-126041 W 400 S 18822 15 01 432 006 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196412 S 700 W 20253 15 02 428 010 0000 156 E SOUTHSANDRUN RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-41 E EXCHANGE PL 66306 16 06 301 029 0000 7170 E MCDONALD DR 4 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85253-5424410 S MAIN ST 18826 15 01 433 004 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183324 SLC INVESTORS, LLC; 5%;324 SLC INVESTORS, LLC; 95%BAY PACIFIC AMERICAN;PLAZA III, LLCFIELDING GROUP, LLCFIELDING GROUP, LLCPROPERTY RESERVE INCNEW YORK LIMITED;PARTNERSHIPGATEWAY OFFICE 4 LCCW THE BEVERLY, LLCGATEWAY PARKING, LCVESTAR GATEWAY, LLCWIFCO LCTOWNE STORAGE GATEWAY, LLCREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF;SALT LAKE CITYCITY CREEK RESERVE INCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCCORP OF PRES. BIS. OF THE;CH OF J C OF LDSCITY CREEK RESERVE INCCITY CREEK CENTER;ASSOCIATES, LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCTOWNE STORAGE GATEWAY, LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCCONSILIUM PROPERTIES LLCBEEHIVE SPUDS PARTNERS, LLCWIFCO LCDUMBLES HOLDINGS, LLCWIFCO LCCW THE BEVERLY, LLCBERNOLFO, DAVID W; ET ALNORTH TEMPLE PROPERTIES, LLC216 DEVELOPMENT, LLCWIFCO LCSEASTRAND LEHI, LLCCENTRAL STATION APARTMENTS,;LLC549 W 200 S 17871 15 01 151 004 0000 423 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1102543 W 400 S 18584 15 01 303 007 0000 1947 E ST MARYS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-2245546 W 400 S 18574 15 01 302 012 0000 730 W 165 S OREM UT 84058-540 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 75859 08 36 352 039 0000 1775 N 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116-542 W 400 S 18575 15 01 302 013 0000 801 N 500 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010-53 S 600 W 62636 15 01 105 003 0000 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014-53 W 300 S 18188 15 01 281 003 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1917536 W 100 S 17814 15 01 105 006 0000 536 W 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1112537 W 400 S 18585 15 01 303 008 0000 1947 E ST MARYS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-224552 S 600 W 17807 15 01 104 006 0000 717 W COLUMBIA LN PROVO UT 84604-535 W 400 S 18586 15 01 303 009 0000 1947 E ST MARYS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-224551 S MAIN ST 76544 16 06 101 034 2006 200 E LONG LAKE RD 300 BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48304-232452 E EXCHANGE PL 32961 16 06 303 011 0000 52 E EXCHANGE PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-271351 S MAIN ST 76548 16 06 101 034 2010 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119651 S MAIN ST 76547 16 06 101 034 2009 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196510 W 100 S 72320 15 01 106 006 0000 527 E PIONEER RD DRAPER UT 84020-983751 S MAIN ST 76545 16 06 101 034 2007 200 E LONG LAKE RD 300 BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48304-232450 S MAIN ST 75893 15 01 227 062 2002 200 E LONG LAKE RD 300 BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48304-50 S MAIN ST 75892 15 01 227 062 2001 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119650 S 200 E 75385 16 06 126 007 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119650 S MAIN ST 75901 15 01 227 062 2010 200 E LONG LAKE RD 300 BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48304-50 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 76540 16 06 101 034 2002 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119650 N 200 W 11134 08 36 478 006 0000 50 E NORTHTEMPLE FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150-50 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 76542 16 06 101 034 2004 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119650 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 76539 16 06 101 034 2001 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196506 W 100 S 66078 15 01 106 003 0000 527 E PIONEER RD DRAPER UT 84020-983750 E 200 S 67145 16 06 152 077 6001 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-31044 S RIO GRANDE ST 68363 15 01 130 001 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85016-503 W 400 S 18593 15 01 303 017 0000 1947 E ST MARYS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-224549 S 600 W 17811 15 01 105 002 0000 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014-4 S 500 W 76893 15 01 102 010 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-310448 W MARKET ST 18793 15 01 430 005 0000 744 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102-290249 N 400 W 68804 08 36 376 014 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-3104485 W 50 N 77732 08 36 376 052 0000 35 N RIO GRANDE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-126048 N 400 W 9751 08 36 377 019 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119647 W 200 S 66891 15 01 280 060 0000 2001 UNION ST, 300 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94123-485 W 50 N 77731 08 36 376 051 0000 35 N RIO GRANDE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-126047 E EXCHANGE PL 66307 16 06 301 030 0000 700 MEADOW LANE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55422-
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183530 WEST LLCSEASTRAND LEHI, LLCNICHOLAS & CO217 DEVELOPMENT LLCSCHOENFELD INVESTMENTS, LLCCENTRAL STATION APARTMENTS,;LLCUTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITYCENTRAL STATION APARTMENTS,;LLC217 DEVELOPMENT LLCCORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDSBONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL CORPCORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDSCORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDSBONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL CORPBONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL CORPCORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDSCORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDSBONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL CORPBONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL CORPCORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDSCORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDSCORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDSCORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDSBONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL CORPBOYER GATEWAY HOTEL LCBRIDGE WF II UT ALTITUDE ON;FIFTH LLCGATEWAY ASSOCIATES LTDCITY CREEK RESERVE INCBANDALOOPS, LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE, INCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCSCHOENFELD INVESTMENTS LLC216 DEVELOPMENT, LLCZEBRA INVESTMENTS, LC217 DEVELOPMENT LLCYEUNG, JACKIEGAELIC LAND HOLDINGS, LLCCORNER 64, LLC217 DEVELOPMENT LLC566 W 200 S 17840 15 01 108 011 0000 19 E 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-1905567 W 400 S 18579 15 01 303 002 0000 801 N 500 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010-563 W 200 S 66080 15 01 151 017 0000 563 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1116565 W 100 S 77202 15 01 108 032 0000 610 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST 200 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102-1208561 W 200 S 66081 15 01 151 018 0000 1335 S COLONIAL CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-2202561 W 400 S 18580 15 01 303 003 0000 801 N 500 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010-560 W 200 S 17841 15 01 108 012 0000 560 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1115560 W 400 S 18572 15 01 302 010 0000 801 N 500 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010-55 W 400 S 18821 15 01 432 005 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119655 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 75897 15 01 227 062 2006 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119655 S WEST TEMPLE ST 75895 15 01 227 062 2004 PO BOX 2229 SEATTLE WA 98111-222955 W 100 S 18034 15 01 229 056 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-276455 S 500 W 68371 15 01 130 009 0000 111 E SEGO LILY DR SANDY UT 84070-442055 S 500 W 68370 15 01 130 008 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-310455 N 300 W 10443 08 36 457 014 0000 PO BOX 1160 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110-116055 N 400 W 73166 08 36 376 024 0000 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-310455 N 300 W 10418 08 36 455 004 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119655 N 300 W 10438 08 36 457 009 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119655 N 300 W 10432 08 36 457 003 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119655 N 300 W 10439 08 36 457 010 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119655 N 300 W 10441 08 36 457 012 0000 PO BOX 1160 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110-116055 N 300 W 10434 08 36 457 005 0000 PO BOX 1160 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110-116055 N 300 W 10419 08 36 455 005 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119655 N 300 W 10436 08 36 457 007 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119655 N 300 W 10433 08 36 457 004 0000 PO BOX 1160 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110-116055 N 300 W 10431 08 36 457 002 0000 PO BOX 1160 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110-116055 N 300 W 10440 08 36 457 011 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119655 N 300 W 10437 08 36 457 008 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119655 N 300 W 10435 08 36 457 006 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119655 N 300 W 10442 08 36 457 013 0000 PO BOX 1160 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110-1160559 W 200 S 17869 15 01 151 002 0000 423 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1102559 W 400 S 18581 15 01 303 004 0000 801 N 500 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010-555 W 200 S 17870 15 01 151 003 0000 423 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1102555 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 69769 08 36 354 021 0000 669 WEST 200 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-551 W 400 S 18582 15 01 303 005 0000 801 N 500 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010-554 W 200 S 17842 15 01 108 013 0000 2492 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106-3531550 W 400 S 18573 15 01 302 011 0000 730 W 165 S OREM UT 84058-551 W 300 S 75357 15 01 153 012 0000 PO BOX 45005 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84145-0005550 W 200 S 77200 15 01 108 034 0000 220 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-2001
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183OZ7 OPPORTUNITY FUND, LLC216 DEVELOPMENT, LLCBROADWAY DOWNTOWN LLCEXCHANGE PLACE PROPERTIES LLC216 DEVELOPMENT, LLC216 DEVELOPMENT, LLC217 DEVELOPMENT LLCCENTRAL WEST APARTMENTS, LLCUTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITYBAY PACIFIC AMERICAN PLAZA II;LLCBAY PACIFIC AMERICAN PLAZA II;LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCEXCHANGE PLACE PROPERTIES LLCOZ7 OPPORTUNITY FUND, LLCBRIDGE WF II UT ALTITUDE ON;FIFTH LLCBRIDGE WF II UT ALTITUDE ON;FIFTH LLCBRIDGE WF II UT ALTITUDE ON;FIFTH LLCRX CRIBS, L.P.LOVE PARTNERSHIP, LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCCORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDSPROPERTY RESERVE INCVESTAR GATEWAY, LLCMERCIER 615, LLCBEEHIVE SPUDS PARTNERS, LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCRR COMPANY OF AMERICA LLCCORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDSBEEHIVE SPUDS PARTNERS, LLCMIERA, ANDY JLEXI, LLCPROPERTY RESERVE, INCCOURTSIDE PLAZA LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCLEXI, LLCJUHLIN, PATRICK FAZ CAP LLCFAE HOLDINGS 483563R LLC; INT;VMM LLC; INTCITY CREEK RESERVE, INC67 W 400 S 18820 15 01 432 004 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119666 E EXCHANGE PL 32954 16 06 303 002 0000 66 E EXCHANGE PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-271367 W 100 S 18008 15 01 229 002 0000 51 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2711660 W 100 S 72596 15 01 103 013 0000 654 W 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104-1001666 W 100 S 62634 15 01 103 010 0000 3675 S 2210 E MILLCREEK UT 84109-431465 E 400 S 32956 16 06 303 004 0000 51 E 400 S 200 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-275365 S REGENT ST 76546 16 06 101 034 2008 200 E LONG LAKE RD 300 BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48304-2324654 W 100 S 17800 15 01 103 006 0000 654 W 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104-100165 E 200 S 32264 16 06 151 009 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119664 S 600 W 17808 15 01 104 007 0000 717 W COLUMBIA LN PROVO UT 84604-650 W 100 S 75148 15 01 103 017 0000 885 E ROCKY MOUTH LN DRAPER UT 84020-7604630 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 75858 08 36 351 034 0000 1100 CAMELLA BLVD LAFAYETTE LA 70508-63 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 66464 09 31 352 012 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196618 W 100 S 17805 15 01 104 003 0000 717 W COLUMBIA LN PROVO UT 84604-61 S STATE ST 75383 16 06 104 025 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119660 S 400 W 76898 15 01 131 017 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85016-615 W 100 S 17823 15 01 107 008 0000 358 S 700 E B507 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102-60 N 400 W 75878 08 36 379 005 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119660 N STATE ST 65864 09 31 354 009 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119660 E EXCHANGE PL 32966 16 06 303 017 0000 70639 PLACERVILLE RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270-60 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 76708 16 06 101 035 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-11965 S 500 W 68366 15 01 130 004 0000 111 E SEGO LILY DR SANDY UT 84070-4420606 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 9686 08 36 351 020 0000 PO BOX 271351 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84127-13515 S 500 W 68364 15 01 130 002 0000 111 E SEGO LILY DR SANDY UT 84070-44205 S 500 W 68368 15 01 130 006 0000 111 E SEGO LILY DR SANDY UT 84070-442058 E EXCHANGE PL 32965 16 06 303 016 0000 1880 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-1322592 W 200 S 17838 15 01 108 009 0000 1810 W 700 N LINDON UT 84042-57 W 200 S 18170 15 01 280 035 0000 2001 UNION ST 300 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94127-57 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 74505 15 01 227 059 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196579 W NORTH TEMPLE ST 69768 08 36 354 020 0000 669 WEST 200 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-57 W 200 S 18177 15 01 280 048 0000 2001 UNION ST,SUITE 300 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94123-571 W 400 S 18578 15 01 303 001 0000 801 N 500 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010-579 W 200 S 63607 15 01 151 015 0000 423 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1102570 W 400 S 18569 15 01 302 007 0000 801 N 500 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010-570 W 400 S 18570 15 01 302 008 0000 801 N 500 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010-56 E 300 S 32296 16 06 153 006 0000 11661 SAN VICENTE BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90049-56 E EXCHANGE PL 32962 16 06 303 012 0000 1880 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-1322568 W 200 S 17839 15 01 108 010 0000 1810 W 700 N LINDON UT 84042-568 W 400 S 18571 15 01 302 009 0000 801 N 500 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010-
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183CJES ENTERPRISES, LLCMEDURA VENTURES, LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE, INCFERGUSON DOP, LLCVMM, LLC; ET ALJOMAR2 LLCLAS TRES AMIGAS, LLCVMM, LLC; ET ALENTIRELY INVESTMENT LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE, INC.200 SOUTH LLCBERNOLFO, DAVID W; ET ALVESTAR GATEWAY, LLCUTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITYK M S LIMITEDUTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITYK M S LIMITEDTHE BOGUE/FFKR BUILDING, LLCAAM INVESTMENTS, LTDAAM INVESTMENTS LTDK & R INTERIORS INCK M S LIMITEDGENEVA ROCK PRODUCTS INCPROPERTY RESERVE, INCSTARKIE, JOHN & PAUL; TCSTARKIE, JOHN & PAUL; TCGENEVA ROCK PRODUCTS, INCBEEHIVE SPUDS PARTNERS, LLCAAM INVESTMENTS LTD200 SOUTH LLC75 LLCPROPERTY RESERVE INCRICHARDS KIDS LIMITED;LIABILITY COMPANYNELSON, GREGORY H; INT;ET ALAAM INVESTMENTS, LTDCREF3 AP1 OWNER, LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCNICK G KALANTZES FAM TR;KALANTZES, NICK G; TR79 W 100 S 18007 15 01 229 001 0000 1518 S CANTERBURY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108-283377 W 200 S 18169 15 01 280 034 0000 2029 CENTURY PARK EA ST LOS ANGELES CA 90067-290179 S MAIN ST 74330 16 06 101 027 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119675 S WEST TEMPLE ST 17993 15 01 227 049 0000 787 SEVENTH AVE NEW YORK NY 10019-760 W 400 S 20243 15 02 427 001 0000 700 E NORTHCREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-331775 N 200 W 62483 08 36 456 037 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119675 S 600 W 17813 15 01 105 005 0000 9546 S 2500 W SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095-940375 E 200 S 32269 16 06 151 016 0000 347 CONGRESS ST BOSTON MA 02210-75 E 400 S 32959 16 06 303 007 0000 51 E 400 S 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-276474 S 600 W 17809 15 01 104 008 0000 717 W COLUMBIA LN PROVO UT 84604-751 W 300 S 19523 15 02 279 001 0000 700 E NORTHCREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-3317745 W 400 S 20249 15 02 428 006 0000 6282 S LAKE FORK CIR TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129-6845748 W 300 S 66135 15 02 277 010 0000 PO BOX 1955 OREM UT 84059-195573 W 400 S 75519 15 01 432 009 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-1196743 W 400 S 20250 15 02 428 007 0000 6282 S LAKE FORK CIR TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129-6845738 W 200 S 19414 15 02 234 010 0000 728 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104-1006739 W 200 S 19512 15 02 277 001 0000 PO BOX 1955 OREM UT 84059-1955735 W 300 S 62709 15 02 427 002 0000 700 E NORTHCREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-3317736 W 300 S 69574 15 02 278 008 0000 736 W 300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104-1008730 W PACIFIC AVE 20252 15 02 428 009 0000 730 W PACIFIC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104-1021735 W 300 S 19524 15 02 280 001 0000 700 E NORTHCREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-3317716 W 300 S 19521 15 02 278 004 0000 669 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1004728 W 200 S 19415 15 02 234 011 0000 728 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104-1006714 W 300 S 67364 15 02 278 006 0000 669 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1004716 W 200 S 19416 15 02 234 012 0000 728 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104-100669 W 300 S 18186 15 01 281 001 0000 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-19176 N RIO GRANDE ST 68805 08 36 376 015 0000 2425 E CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85016-68 S MAIN ST 18000 15 01 228 005 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119669 E 200 S 32268 16 06 151 015 0000 347 CONGRESS ST BOSTON MA 02210-68 S MAIN ST 18005 15 01 228 010 0000 51 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-271168 S MAIN ST 17998 15 01 228 003 0000 68 S MAIN ST FL-2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-68 S MAIN ST 18002 15 01 228 007 0000 68 S MAIN ST 600 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-151568 S MAIN ST 18003 15 01 228 008 0000 68 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-150668 S MAIN ST 17999 15 01 228 004 0000 68 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-150668 S MAIN ST 18006 15 01 228 011 0000 51 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-271168 S MAIN ST 18001 15 01 228 006 0000 68 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-150668 S MAIN ST 17997 15 01 228 002 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119668 S MAIN ST 18004 15 01 228 009 0000 68 S MAIN ST 8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1525
Page 1 of 1Property Owner Report8/11/2021 12:50:46 PMDistric DA, Extension CBIA-22, SAA 1183WEST BROADWAY INVESTORS, LLCPROPERTY RESERVE, INCJUDGE BUILDING, LLCBCAL GATEWAY PROPERTY LLCCITY CREEK RESERVE INCBOSTON BUILDING LLCFIELDING GROUP, LLCTotal Properties 7329 E EXCHANGE PL 32934 16 06 301 012 0000 1215 FOURTH AVE 600 SEATTLE WA 98161-9 N RIO GRANDE ST 77729 08 36 376 049 0000 35 N RIO GRANDE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-126090 S 400 W 76899 15 01 131 016 0000 90 S 400 W 570 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-137299 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST 75896 15 01 227 062 2005 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-119685 W 400 S 75518 15 01 432 008 0000 PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151-11968 E 300 S 32291 16 06 153 001 0000 967 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103-221880 W 300 S 76916 15 01 280 067 0000 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY LOGAN UT 84321-
4828-2501-6059, v. 3 C-1 Designation Resolution
EXHIBIT C
NOTICE OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
Salt Lake City, Utah
November 16, 2021
A regular meeting of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, was held on Tuesday,
November 16, 2021, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., via electronic means, at which meeting there
were present the following members who constituted a quorum:
Amy Fowler Chair
James Rogers Vice-Chair
Dan Dugan Councilmember
Ana Valdemoros Councilmember
Dennis Faris Councilmember
Darin Mano Councilmember
Chris Wharton Councilmember
Also present:
Erin Mendenhall Mayor
Katherine Lewis City Attorney
Cindy Lou Trishman City Recorder
Absent:
After the conduct of other business not pertinent to the following, the Chair stated
that the Office of the City Engineer had prepared the assessment list for the Salt Lake City,
Utah Central Business Improvement Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA-22, for action and
consideration by the Board of Equalization and by the City Council, which assessment list
is on file in the office of the City Recorder and available for inspection by any interested
property owner.
Thereupon,
.0 the following resolution was considered and fully discussed:
2 Board of Equalization Resolution
4826-2398-8730, v. 4
RESOLUTION NO. __ OF 2021
A Resolution of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, appointing a
Board of Equalization for the Salt Lake City, Utah Central Business
Improvement Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA-22; setting the dates for the
Board of Equalization to hear and consider objections and corrections to
any proposed assessments; authorizing the City Recorder to publish and
mail a Notice of Assessment and Board of Equalization Hearings; and
related matters.
WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City Council”), adopted
a Notice of Intention to Designate Assessment Area on July 20, 2021 (the “Notice of
Intention”), to designate the Salt Lake City, Utah Central Business Improvement
Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA-22 (the “Assessment Area”), and published and posted
said Notice as required by the Assessment Area Act, Title 11, Chapter 42, Utah Code
Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Notice of Intention and as required by the Act,
a hearing was held before the City Council on September 7, 2021 (the “Public Hearing”);
and
WHEREAS, up until 5:00 p.m. on November 8, 2021, persons having an interest
in the Assessment Area were allowed to protest the designation of the Assessment Area,
the inclusion of a property owner’s property in the Assessment Area, the proposed
economic promotion activities, whether the assessment meets the requirements of Utah
Code Section 11-42-409, or any other aspect of the proposed designation of the Assessment
Area; and
WHEREAS, after protests against the designation of the Assessment Area were
counted and considered, the City Council designated the Assessment Area by resolution
adopted on November 16, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared the proposed assessment list that
pertains to all of the properties within the Assessment Area; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a board of equalization for the
purpose of considering any objections and corrections to the proposed assessment list:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT
LAKE CITY, UTAH AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. As required by law, a Board of Equalization for the Assessment
Area is hereby appointed, consisting of one member of the City Council or a representative
of the City Council, a representative of the City Treasurer’s office, and a representative of
the City Engineer’s office (the “Board”) as follows:
3 Board of Equalization Resolution
4826-2398-8730, v. 4
To Be Determined Member of City Council or a representative
Marina Scott, Steven Bagley Representative of City Treasurer’s office
Chris Norlem Representative of City Engineer’s office
Section 2. The Board shall sit as the Board of Equalization on the special
assessments proposed to be levied and assessed on the property within the Assessment
Area and may elect to meet via electronic means or in person at the City & County
Building, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah on January 11, 2022 between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 10:00 a.m.; on January 12, 2022 between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m.;
and on January 13, 2022, between the hours of 1:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m. to hear and consider
any arguments from persons who claim to be aggrieved and, following the hearings, to
consider all facts and arguments presented at the hearings and to and make corrections to
the proposed assessments that the Board may deem necessary to meet the requirements of
the Act.
Section 3. The City Recorder is hereby authorized and directed to publish, post
and mail, as provided by law and the ordinances of the City, a notice of meetings of the
Board, said notice to be in substantially the following form:
4 Board of Equalization Resolution
4826-2398-8730, v. 4
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT AND BOARD OF EQUALIZATION HEARINGS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the assessment list for the Salt Lake City, Utah
Central Business Improvement Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA-22 (the “Assessment
Area”) has now been completed and is available for examination at the Salt Lake City
Recorder’s office located at 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake City, Utah. The
City Council has appointed a Board of Equalization to hear and consider arguments from
any person who claims to be aggrieved by the proposed assessments to be levied within
the Assessment Area, including arguments relating to (a) the amount of benefits accruing
to the property proposed to be assessed or (b) the amount of the proposed assessment.
The assessments levied are for the purpose paying for the proposed activities, which
include, but are not limited to, advertising, marketing, special events, festivals,
transportation, newsletters, publications, banners, Christmas lighting, security, special
projects, housing, town meetings, government policy, cultural promotion, reports, surveys,
homeless services and other promotional activities (the “Economic Promotion Activities”)
in the downtown area (for the benefit of the properties within the Assessment Area). The
total amount of the assessments to be levied against benefitted property within Assessment
Area is expected to be $5,251,285, and will be based upon (i) 2021 taxable property values
(the “Base Assessment”), plus (ii) linear feet (except that corner lots will not be assessed
for both frontages as applicable, only one) on certain properties with frontage on certain
streets for special holiday lights (the “Holiday Light Assessment” and together with the
Base Assessment, the “Assessment”). The unit cost is each property’s proportionate share
of the Economic Promotion Activities applicable to the property as described in this notice.
Funding from assessments provides only a portion of the total budget for the Assessment
Area’s programs and activities. Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”) will not contribute any
of its own funds for the Economic Promotion Activities; however, the City anticipates that
the manager of the Assessment Area will secure non-assessment funds from other sources
such as grants, foundations, promotions, contributions, earned income, and sponsorships.
As required by law, three persons have been duly appointed to act as the Board of
Equalization on the assessments proposed to be levied on the property benefited within the
Assessment Area. The Board of Equalization for assessments proposed to be levied on the
affected property within the Assessment Area will meet via electronic means or in person
at the City & County Building, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah, on January 11, 2022,
between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m.; on January 12, 2022, between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m.; and on January 13, 2022, between the hours of 1:00 p.m. and
2:00 p.m. to hear and consider any objections to and make any corrections of any proposed
assessments that the Board may deem necessary to meet the requirements of the
Assessment Area Act, Title 11, Chapter 42, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended.
The assessment list and amounts of the proposed assessment against each parcel of
property have been completed and are available for public examination from 8:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. at the Office of the City Recorder, 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake
City, Utah.
5 Board of Equalization Resolution
4826-2398-8730, v. 4
After the Board has held all hearings and has made all corrections the Board
considers necessary to comply with the law, the Board will report its findings to the City
Council of the City. Appeal from a decision of the Board of Equalization may be taken to
the City Council of the City by filing with the City Council a written notice of appeal in
the office of the City Recorder within fifteen (15) days after the date the Board’s final
report to the City Council is mailed to the affected property owners.
By resolution of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this November 16, 2021.
(SEAL)
CITY RECORDER
6 Board of Equalization Resolution
4826-2398-8730, v. 4
Section 4. The City Recorder is hereby directed to enter the foregoing
proceedings upon the records of the City, and to cause the notice set forth in Section 3 to
be (i) posted in at least three public places within the City’s boundaries beginning at least
twenty (20) and not more than thirty-five (35) days before the day on which the Board will
begin hearings, and (ii) published on the Utah Public Notice Website created in Utah Code,
Section 63A-16-601 for at least thirty-five (35) days immediately before the day on which
the Board will begin hearings.
A copy of the notice set forth in Section 3 above shall not later than ten (10) days
after the first publication or posting of such notice described in the preceding paragraph,
be mailed, postage prepaid, to each owner of property to be assessed within the Assessment
Area at the last known address of such owner using for such purpose the names and
addresses appearing on the last completed real property assessment rolls of Salt Lake
County. In addition, a copy of such notice shall be addressed to “Owner” and shall be so
mailed, addressed to the street number (or post office box, rural route number, or other
mailing address of the property, if a street number has not been assigned) of each of the
improved properties to be affected by the assessment.
After due consideration of said resolution by the City Council, Councilmember
____________ moved and Councilmember ___________ seconded its adoption and the
same was adopted by the following vote:
AYE:
NAY:
7 Board of Equalization Resolution
4826-2398-8730, v. 4
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this November 16, 2021.
(SEAL)
By:
Chair
ATTEST:
By:
City Recorder
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
Boyd Ferguson
Senior City Attorney
8 Board of Equalization Resolution
4826-2398-8730, v. 4
PRESENTATION TO THE MAYOR
The foregoing resolution was presented to the Mayor for her approval or
disapproval on ____________, 2021.
By:
Chair
MAYOR’S APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved on this ____________, 2021.
By:
Mayor
9 Board of Equalization Resolution
4826-2398-8730, v. 4
STATE OF UTAH )
: ss.
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the duly appointed, qualified, and acting City Recorder of
Salt Lake City, Utah, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy
of the minutes pertaining to the DA-CBIA-22 of a regular meeting of the City Council of
Salt Lake City held by electronic means in Salt Lake City on Tuesday, November 16, 2021,
at 7:00 p.m. as recorded in the regular official book of minutes as kept in my official office,
that said proceedings were duly had and taken as therein shown, and that all the members
of the City Council were given due, legal, and timely notice of said meeting as therein
shown.
I further certify that (i) I posted or caused to be posted in three public places within
the City’s boundaries a Notice of Assessment and Board of Equalization Hearings (the
“Notice”) for the Salt Lake City, Utah Central Business Improvement Assessment Area
No. DA-CBIA-22, beginning at least twenty (20) and not more than thirty-five (35) days
before the day on which said Board will begin its hearings and (ii) I caused the Notice to
be published on the Utah Public Notice Website for at least thirty-five (35) days
immediately before the day on which the Board will begin its hearings.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official
seal of Salt Lake City, Utah, this __________, 2021.
(SEAL)
By:
City Recorder
10 Board of Equalization Resolution
4826-2398-8730, v. 4
STATE OF UTAH )
: ss. MAILING CERTIFICATE
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the duly appointed, qualified, and acting City Recorder of
Salt Lake City, Utah, do hereby certify that I mailed a copy of the Notice of Assessment
and Board of Equalization Hearings (the “Notice”) of the Board of Equalization, postage
prepaid, to each owner of property to be assessed within Salt Lake City, Utah Central
Business Improvement Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA-22, at the last known address of
such owner, using for such purpose the names and addresses appearing on the last
completed real property assessment rolls of Salt Lake County and, in addition, I mailed,
postage prepaid, a copy of such Notice addressed to “Owner” at the street number (or post
office box, rural route number, or other mailing address of the property, if a street number
has not been assigned) of each piece of improved property to be assessed. Said Notices
were mailed by me on ____________, 2021, that being not later than ten (10) days after
the first publication/posting of the Notice as above certified.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official
seal of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ____________, 2021.
(SEAL)
By:
City Recorder
11 Board of Equalization Resolution
4826-2398-8730, v. 4
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW
I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the undersigned City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the
“City”), do hereby certify, according to the records of the City in my official possession,
and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the requirements of
Section 52-4-202, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, I gave not less than twenty-
four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time, and place of the November 16,
2021, public meeting held by the City Council of the City as follows:
(a) By causing a copy of such Notice, in the form attached hereto as
Schedule 1, to be delivered to the Salt Lake Tribune on ___________, 2021, at least
twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting; and
(b) By causing a copy of such Notice, in the form attached hereto as
Schedule 1, to be posted on the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov)
at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting.
In addition, the Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting Schedule for the City Council
(attached hereto as Schedule 2) was given specifying the date, time, and place of the regular
meetings of the City Council to be held during the year, by causing said Notice to be (a)
posted on ___________, 2021 at the principal office of the City Council, (b) provided to
at least one newspaper of general circulation within the City on ___________, 2021 and
(c) published on the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov) during the current
calendar year.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature this
November 16, 2021.
(SEAL)
By:
City Recorder
12 Board of Equalization Resolution
4826-2398-8730, v. 4
SCHEDULE 1
NOTICE OF MEETING
13 Board of Equalization Resolution
4826-2398-8730, v. 4
SCHEDULE 2
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING SCHEDULE
INTERSTATE 15REGENT STEDISON STRICHARDS STVIN
E
A
L
M
O
N
DQUINCE STALMOND30 0 N
CANYONALAME DA
STANTON
BELD ON
GALE STPACIF ICAVE700 WWASHINGTONLACONIAHOYT PL
QUINCECOTTAGE
STRINGFELLOWGR EGORYWAYNEDELMARPOPLAR A R N O L D
DUBEICHATMANCANYON SIDE LNOR PHEUM ROADSPENCER CTJACK SON AV
EMERIL AVE
ELDER CTPIERP ON T
TEMPLE
PACIF IC AVPACIFIC
600 S MOFFATT CTNORT H TEMPLE
PLUM ALLEYPIERP ON T
MA RKET S T
SHELMERDINEBLAIR STIVERSONCONWAYSOCIAL H ALL
WOODBINEBUTTERWORTHMARGUERITEFLORALPLEASANTTEMPLESOUTH
EAST200EDMONDSARGYLEBLISS CTRENDON CTSEWARD
JACKSON AV
ECCLE S
EXCHANGE PL
GA LL IVAN AVLOMAGRAY EASTHILLSIDE AV CAPITOL STRIO GRANDECTOR CHARD P L
MORTENSENCTWALL50 N
SQUARE SQUARE
LIBRARYWASHINGTON
PIONEER
PARKGATEWAYTHEDANSIE DR
40 0 S400 S
500 S500 S
200 W400 W500 W300 W200 W600 S600 S600 WMAIN ST300 E400 E40 0 S
10 0 S
30 0 S 300 S300 S
200 S MAIN ST300 N
20 0 N
200 E300 E400 E700 W600 W500 W400 W(HWY 89)3RD AVE
B STC STD STA ST1ST AVE
600 W500 W200 N
300 N
(HWY 186 )
30 0 S
200 S
10 0 S
700 WINTERSTATE 15WESTTEMPLESTATE STSTATE STWEST TEMPLE300 W200 W400 WWEST TEMPLESal t La ke CityCBIABoundary Ma p 4
50 51
299
375
80
255
131
222206
324
215
380
220
60
61
128
175
111
7
310 8
136
15
9
132
201
316
77
185
36
120
360
102
75
161
170
15
375
15
307
0
10
248
306
122
311
10
10
110
69
239
335
100
111
175
26
250
311
143
48 334322
341 342
360
79
360
51
185
10
163
150
144
334
320
149
321326
135
160165
75
262
149
330
357
319
155
328
260
163151
145
158156
159
323
155
268
159
338
327 331
225
18
149
124
160
325
122 118
270
120116
315
370
317
30
50
55
50
55
55
30
55
50
50
30
99
50
50
555550
5550
5045
55
50
44
44 44
99
9945
55
45
50
994450 65
505065
515151
51
5050
51
50
50
50
51 65
50
50
51
50
51
50
51 50
21
51
51 50
50 655051
200 S200 S
400 S400 S
300 S300 S 200 E200 E400 W400 W300 W300 W200 W200 W100 S100 SMain St Main St State St State St South Temple St South Temple St West Temple St West Temple St Rio Grande St Rio Grande St Edison St Edison St Regent StRegent StExchange Pl Exchange Pl
Pierpont Ave Pierpont Ave Plum Aly Plum Aly Floral St Floral St Social Hall Ave Social Hall Ave
Gallivan Ave Gallivan Ave Poplar Ct Poplar Ct Wayne Ct Wayne Ct Moffatt Ct Moffatt Ct Marguerite Ct Marguerite Ct Shelmerdine Ct Shelmerdine Ct 100 S100 S
Pierpont Ave Pierpont Ave
CBIA 22: Holiday Lighting Parcels (Preliminary)Salt Lake City Geographic Information Systems OHoliday Lighting Streets Included Parcels
CBIA ‐ 22 Tentative Timeline
Step Action Description Group/Lead Deadlines
1 Consultant Contract Contract with a consultant to provide guidance
throughout process.DED 2/1/21 ‐ 4/30/2021
2 Technical Description of the CBIA
Technical Description of the CBIA provided to
Engineering. Engineering prepares tax roll based on this
data.
Consultant 3/12/2021
3 Develop assessment methodology that conforms to
Assessment Area Act.
Develop assessment methodology concerning
Economic Promotion & Lighting Assessment.DED 3/24/2021
4 Salt Lake County Property Tax Information. Numbers should be available by May 22, 2021. Consultant 5/28/2021
5 Bond Counsel Description & Improvement Review Bond Counsel reviews the description of Improvements
and Areas to be Improved.DED 6/1/2021
6 Resolution of intent to designate.Bond Counsel drafts resolution of Intent to Designate. Bond Counsel 6/15/2021
7 Resolution of Intent to Designate and Justification
transmittal. (Mayor)
Resolution of Intent to Designate and justification
documentation transmitted to Mayor’s Office. DED 6/22/2021
8 Resolution of Intent to Designate and Justification
transmittal. (Council Office)
Resolution of Intent to Designate and justification
documentation transmitted to Council Office. Mayor’s Office 6/29/2021
9 City Council Meeting DED will brief the City Council on CBIA‐22 Information. DED 7/13/2021
10 Property Owner Letter
Property Owner letter includes verbiage of preliminary
estimate, rate, notice of intent to designate, common
question and map finalized.
DED 7/17/2021
11 Tax roll prepared for DED approval. Assess County Data. Engineering 7/17/2021
12 DED approval of tax roll. DED approves county data. DED 7/17/2021
13 City Council Meeting City Council adopts the resolution of Intent to
Designate the assessment area.City Council 7/20/2021
14 Draft/Create Notice of Intent to Designate Letter Engineering 7/22/2021
15 Post Notice of Intent to Designate Post notice of intent to designate in at least three
public places within boundaries of jurisdiction DED 8/16/2021
16 Mail out Notice of Intent to Designate Mail out Notice of Intent to Designate to go out within
10 days of notice posting.
DED sends via State
Mail 8/19/2021
17 Minutes prepared for use at protest hearing Distribute to team SAA. Bond Counsel 8/30/2021
18 City Council Meeting City Council Protest Hearing City Council 9/7/2021
19 Draft Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and
appoint the Board of Equalization (BOE).Bond Counsel 9/14/2021
20
Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and
appoint the Board of Equalization Transmittal (Mayor’s
Office)
Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and
appoint the Board of Equalization Transmited to
Mayor’s Office.
DED 9/21/2021
21 Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and
appoint the Board of Equalization (City Council).
Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and
appoint the Board of Equalization Transmited to the
Council Office.
Mayor’s Office 9/28/2021
22 Publish Notice of Intent to Designate Publish Notice of Intent to Designate on the Utah Public
Notice Website DED 10/4/2021
23 Property Owners Written Protests Filing Deadline Property owners who are protesting the assessment
area. Also, the end of 60‐day written protest period.Engineering 11/8/2021
24 Compile Written Protests.Engineering 11/9/2021
25 RFP: Center Business Improvement Assessment Area
Management Request For Propsal (RFP)
Solisitation to find a vendor to manage the assessment
area once approved. DED 11/9/2022
26 Delivery of Compilation of Protests Compilation of protests sent to City Council. Engineering 11/9/2021
27 Publishing of Written Protests Publishing of Written Protests on City & State public
notice website.DED 11/9/2021
28 City Council Meeting City Council announces the protest tally and if it
exceeds 40% threshold.City Council 11/16/2021
29 City Council Meeting
City Council adopts the Resolution to Designate the
Assessment Area and appoints the Board of
Equalization.
City Council 11/16/2021
30 Recording of the Resolution to Designate the
Assessment Area & Notice of Proposed Assesment
Record Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area
and Notice of Proposed Assessment with Salt Lake
County Recorder, within 15 days of adoption.
Salt Lake City
Recorders 11/16/2021 ‐ 12/1/2021
31 BOE Notice and Dates of BOE Meetings.Finalize Verbiage for BOE notice and dates of BOE
meetings.Bond Counsel 11/24/2021
32 Mailing process for the BOE notice. Begins 2 weeks before mailing date. Engineering 12/3/2021
33 RFP: Center Business Improvement Assessment Area
Management submissions Proposals/submission due from interested vendors DED 12/7/2021
34 Publication of the BOE hearings.
Publication and posting of time and location of the 3
consecutive meetings. Posted in at least 3 public places
at least 20 days, but not more than 35 days from the
first BOE hearings dates. Published on the Utah Public
Notice Website.
DED 12/7/2021
35 Mailing due to Recorder’s Office for review. Due 1 week before mailing date. Engineering 12/10/2021
36 Mailing of preliminary assessment & notice of BOE
hearings
Mailing sent to each property owner and each street
address. DED 12/17/2021
37 BOE hearings 9:00 am to 10:00 am (public meeting). Held on consecutive days by statute.Salt Lake City
Recorders 1/11/2022
38 BOE hearings 10:00 am to 11:00 am (public meeting). Held on consecutive days by statute.Salt Lake City
Recorders 1/12/2022
39 BOE hearings 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm (public meeting). Held on consecutive days by statute.Salt Lake City
Recorders 1/13/2022
40 Finalization of BOE Hearings Finalize the report DED 1/18/2022
41 RFP: Center Business Improvement Assessment Area
Management Selection Selection is made from the proposals submitted DED 1/21/2022
42 BOE Report Completion BOE report completed, signed, and forwarded to City
Council and Bond Counsel.DED 1/21/2022
43 Mailing of BOE Final Report BOE report mailed to objecting property owners. Begins
15 day appeal period. Engineering 1/21/2022
44 Assessment Ordinance Bond Counsel Draft Assessment Ordinance Bond Counsel 1/28/2022
45 Assessment Ordinance Transmittal (Mayor’s Office).Assessment Ordinance transmitted to the Mayor's
Office. DED 2/1/2022
46 Assessment Ordinance Transmittal (Council Office).Assessment Ordinance transmitted to the Council
Office. Mayor’s Office 2/8/2022
47 City Council Meeting City Council accepts or modifies BOE recommendations
and adopts or rejects Assessment Ordinance.City Council 3/1/2022
48 RFP: Center Business Improvement Assessment Area
Management Contract drafting and Execution
Agreement between Salt Lake City and the vendor to
manage the assesment area. DED 3/4/2022
49 Budget or budget amendment submittion for CBIA Submit budget to SLC Finance Department DED 3/17/2022
50 Transfer properties into billing status.Engineering 3/17/2022
51 Assessment Invoices and Billing Mail assessment notices and invoices to Property
Owners by April 5, 2022 the latest.Treasurer 3/18/2022
52 Publication & Posting of the Assessment Ordinance
1. Publication of the Assessment Ordinance on the Utah
Public Notice Website.
2. Post a copy of the Assessment Ordinance in at least
three public places within the jurisdiction boundaries.
For at least 21 days
Bond Council 3/20/2022
53 Certificate of Project Engineer Certificate of Project Engineer Signed by DED DED 3/25/2022
54 Record Notice of Assessment Interest with Salt Lake
County Recorder.
I note that Utah Code 11‐42‐404(4)(b)(iii) requires the
notice of assessment interest to “describe the property
assessed by legal description and tax identification
number.” Metes and Bounds legal description provided
by Recorder’s Office.
Salt Lake City
Recorders 4/21/2022
55 Effective start date of the Assessment Ordinance Must be specified in the Assessment Ordinance DED 4/21/2022
56 Assessment Payments Due Invoice Payments due from property owners [15 days
after effective date of Assessment Ordinance]Treasurer 5/6/2022
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Sam Owen, Policy Analyst
DATE: November 16, 2021
RE:Wastewater Control Revisions, Ordinance 17.36.60,
Affirmative Defense Provision
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Department of Public Utilities working with industrial and commercial users of the sewer system on types of
discharge permits for businesses whose operations may dispose of waste through the City’s sewer system. In a
review of the Pretreatment Program, changes to City Code were identified to bring the language into compliance.
The State of Utah’s Division of Water Quality “is requiring that City Code… be updated to properly match
[United States Environmental Protection Agency] requirements regarding affirmative defense and prohibited
discharges.”
The updates will move the City into compliance with state and federal requirements in terms of how the
ordinance is written, but require no changes to the City’s Sewer Utility current regulatory practice.
The City Council is scheduled to take action on this item on December 7, and approval of the
ordinance is understood as conditional, per State law. If the Council conditionally approves the
ordinance, the State’s Division of Water Quality will initiate a public engagement period. The ordinance would
then return to the Council for formal adoption if the pertinent requirements are met.
ISSUE SUMMARY
Basically, the City Code regarding users of the Sewer Utility is being proposed for update. The update adds new
prohibitions from the Environmental Protection Agency, through the State’s Division of Water Quality. The City
Code already meets the standards that would be created through the code update, however the code does not
expressly show that in the way the update requires.
In other words, no changes to the City’s Sewer Utility and its current regulatory practice are expected to occur.
The changes are technical or formal in nature. The updates will move the City into compliance with state and
federal requirements in terms of how the ordinance is written. Conversely, the City practice was already in
compliance.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: November 16, 2021
Public Hearing: n/a (State
process)
Potential Action: December 7,
2021
Page | 2
“Affirmative defenses” are available to Sewer Utility customers who are in the position of violating the
ordinance, when certain events occur that are contemplated and described in the ordinance. An affirmative
defense is available when a customer discharges into the system in a way the code contemplates, but does not
allow. Affirmative defenses expressly provided in the code can attenuate the severity of penalties for a prohibited
release into the City’s sewer system.
The update would expressly eliminate from the affirmative defense list discharge events having to do with fire or
explosion hazards, low pH (highly acidic) discharges, and discharges involving trucked or hauled wastes.
Attachments
1.Administrative transmittal
Lisa Shaffer (Sep 29, 2021 11:55 MDT)
09/29/2021
09/29/2021
Administrative
updates
November 16, 2021
COVID 19
update
Current metrics
26 of 29 counties in the state remain in the
"very high" transmission rate.
COVID ICU utilization is at 41%, with ICUs
93% full statewide.
Statewide, 10% of children aged 5-11 have
had their first shot (36,774 kids).
Kids aged 5-11 are also seeing the highest
infection rates of any time in the pandemic.
COVID 19
update
Current metrics
1,238 cases statewide today, down 320 from
last week.
Of those, 276 were school-aged cases.
13 new deaths reported today.
Statewide 7-day average is 1,592 per day.
54.5% of all Utahns are fully vaccinated.
COVID 19
update
SLCO 14 -day
snapshot
COVID 19
update
Vaccine
now available
for everyone
age 5 and up
There is NO COST for the
vaccine and NO insurance
is required.
Starting Monday, November
8th, the County HD will be at
Elementary schools
throughout the County
during November and
December.
The clinics at elementary
schools are open to the
public and for all authorized
ages.
Community members can
call 2-1-1 to schedule a
free ride to a vaccine clinic.
Clinics this week
See the full list at
SLCSchools.org
or
SaltLakeHealth.org
COVID 19 update: Westside vaccination rates
current metrics
October 5 October 12 October 19 November 9 November 16
84101 77% full
12.34% partial
77.58% full
12.25% partial
78.05% full
12.34% partial
78.86% full
13.45% partial
78.77% full
14.44% partial
84104 46.22% full
6.77% partial
46.71% full
6.64% partial
46.99% full
6.68% partial
47.93% full
7.02% partial
48.21% full
7.68% partial
84116 49.19% full
6.48% partial
49.58% full
6.45% partial
49.96% full
6.37% partial
50.83% full
6.73% partial
51.07% full
7.58% partial
Citywide average = 64.12% fully vaccinated
COVID 19 update: countywide demographics
current metricsOct. 5 Oct. 12 Oct. 19 Nov. 9 Nov. 16
Asian 73%74%74%75%75%
White 70%70%71%72%72%
Black or African
American
58%58%59%60%61%
American Indian or
Alaska Native
66%67%67%68%69%
Native Hawaiian or
Pacific Islander
52%53%54%56%57%
Hispanic ethnicity 44%45%45%46%47%
Other race 47%47%47%48%49%
Homelessness update
shelter occupancy
Previous: November 1, 2021 –November 5, 2021
Current: November 8,2021 –November 12, 2021
Men’s HRC King HRC Miller HRC Total
Shelter capacity 300 200 200 700
Previous Current Previous Current Previous Current Previous Current
Avg. number of beds occupied
each night 292 295 199 198 191 190 682 683
Avg number of beds unoccupied
each night 8 5 1 2 9 10 18 17
Avg % of beds occupied each
night 97.4%98.3%99.4%99%95.6%95%97.5%97.6%
Avg % of beds unoccupied each
night 2.6%1.7%0.6%1%4.4%5%2.5%2.4%
Homelessness
update
current events
Outreach Events
Our last Resource Fair for the year will be on
Nov. 30th. Location is to be determined.
Cleaning and Abatement
There are no Health Department abatements
this week.
Our team is working on a protocol for
response to occupied vehicle encampments
that utilizes the funds the Council set aside
recently to address this challenge.
Homelessness
update
current events
State Funding
Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget
Rescue Plan grant funding awarded for Airport
Inn purchase-$3M
Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation grant
funding recommendation for FY23
is $837,131.92
Salt Lake County
emergency shelter
vs
deeply affordable
housing needs
Housing info taken from the
"Housing Now" document
produced by SLVCEH;
Shelter info taken from Shelter the
Homeless data
Emergency Shelter <40% Housing
'21 1700 beds 2950 units
(1100 permanent)
'22 ongoing 1386
'23 ongoing 1386
'24 ongoing 1386
_________________________________
Total ~1700 beds 7108 Units
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE: November 16, 2021
RE:Text Amendment: Significant Water
Consuming Land Uses
PLNPCM2021-00638
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: November 16, 2021
Set Date: November 16, 2021
Public Hearing: Dec 7, 2021
Potential Action: Dec 7 or 14
2021
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would limit the amount of City culinary water that
commercial and industrial land uses can utilize. The zoning amendment would implement a 300,000-
gallon a day limit for commercial and industrial land uses. The limit affects multiple zones and multiple
land uses citywide. The ordinance also amends and clarifies the definitions of related land use terms.
This petition was initiated by the Mayor on June 6, 2021. On July 8, the City imposed temporary zoning
regulations that prohibited new or expanding land uses that use more than 300,000 gallons per day. This
was done through the “pending ordinance” rule, established by Utah Code (10-9a-509), which allows
prohibiting certain uses for 180 days. The pending ordinance expires on January 4, 2022.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the proposal on September 22, 2021 and voted to
forward a unanimous positive recommendation to the City Council.
Page | 2
POLICY QUESTIONS
The Council may wish to request the administration discuss in depth how they determined the
300,00 gallons per day limit was appropriate and if a lower the maximum allowable usage per day
was considered.
The staff report notes that most of the properties in the northwest quadrant, north of I-80 would be
exempt from this change because the development agreement between the property owners and the
City vests them in 2018 zoning ordinance. See Attachment A -Planning Commission Staff Report
Map
o The Council may wish to further discuss this with the administration, specifically to clarify
which properties are exempt from these proposed changes.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The water use limit is intended to preserve City water resources in the long term, while at the same time
allowing for the City’s continued economic development. Agricultural, institutional, and residential uses
are exempted from the ordinance, as they generally would not reach the water use threshold and in the very
limited cases where such uses may potentially exceed the threshold, they provide other public good or
health benefits that warrant exemption, such as public recreational space.
The Transmittal letter note there are currently two uses in the City that exceed the threshold, the
University of Utah and a refinery. Both uses have full or partial exemptions from compliance with City
zoning regulations due to other State or Federal regulations. All other commercial and industrial uses in
the City currently use less than the proposed 300,000-gallon per day limit.
There are only two existing businesses that currently exceed 200,000-gallons per day. The City is aware of
at least one bottling plant use currently in the process of obtaining City permits that may exceed the
300,000-gallon limit. (Transmittal Letter, Page 2). That business already applied for a building permit
prior to the Mayor’s petition so it would not be affected by the proposed changes as it is vested.
KEY CHANGES (Planning Commission Staff Report, Page 2)
Implements a water use limit on commercial and industrial land uses 300,000-gallons/day
Clarifies definition of bottling plant to cover bottling of beverages in any form, including bottles,
cans, or any other container.
Defines the terms water use report and potable water (used in the proposed regulation).
Adds a footnote to bottling plant land use referencing the existing Inland Port overlay prohibition
on bottling plants
Pages 3-8 of the Planning Commission staff reports includes a discussion about the key issues identified by
the Planning Staff. A short summary of those is provided below. See the planning commission staff report
to view the full analysis.
1.Land Uses and Businesses Impacted by the Proposal
The proposed ordinance is directed at large, intensive commercial and industrial land
uses that have the potential to consume significant amounts of water.
Impacted zoning districts include: Light Manufacturing (M-1) and General Commercial
(CG), Heavy Manufacturing, Downtown, Transit Station Area, Business Park, Research
Park, Form Based Zones, and other Commercial zones.
Page | 3
The City’s Zoning ordinance currently prohibits “bottling plant” uses from anywhere
within the Inland Port overlay. The prohibition was adopted in 2018 as part of the
Inland Port Overlay.
o However, the properties north of I-80 which are part of the development
agreement are vested in the City’s 2018 zoning code. These changes would not
apply to those properties.
o See Map, Attachment A -Planning Commission Staff Report
Other properties exempt from this change include large state-owned properties such as
the State Prison, State and Institutional Trust Land Administration (SITLA) land,
University of Utah, University Medical, and Research Park.
The 300,000 gallons per day limit is based on an analysis of existing uses on the City’s
water system and is intended to balance water resources with continued business
development.
o The 300,000-gallon limit also takes into consideration the City’s deliberate long
term water supply and demand planning, including future development of
additional water resources and climate change risks associated with drought
intensification.
o The City’s long-term planning assumes a variety of future residential,
commercial, industrial, and institutional land uses that generally align with the
current mix of water use intensity, but with a growing population and increased
development.
o This is a proactive approach as there appears to be growing interest in siting
industries within the City that are proposing to use more than 300,000 gallons
of water per day, and in some cases more than 1 million gallons of water per
day.
2. Original Ordinance Proposal and Subsequent Changes
The first version of the ordinance included a blanket limit of 300,000 gallons per day
for all uses and a prohibition on bottling plants citywide, with an exemption for alcohol
related uses.
o Based on additional research and input, the draft ordinance was revised to
directly target commercial and industrial users.
o The ordinance was also revised to remove the proposed blanket citywide
bottling plant ban along with the associated alcohol manufacturer exemption.
The proposal would have treated water, milk, or soda bottling plants
differently than other uses that may have similar water impacts, such as
breweries, and could appear to unfairly target such uses.
3. Public Notice and City Department/Public Input
July 2021, the City posted an “Open House” webpage
Planning sent information to Recognized Community Organizations
Planning staff attended Business Advisory Board meeting
The City’s Sustainability and Economic Development Departments reviewed and
provided comments
State Department of Agriculture provided comments
CITY COUNCIL // NOVEMBER 16, 2021
SIGNIFICANT WATER CONSUMINGLAND USES
•Drought conditions
•Inquiries from large water users
•City evaluating zoning regulations
•Types of uses allowed and potential water
use
•No real limits on water use in City code
•Commercial/industrial uses that use very
large amounts of water are possible
BACKGROUND
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
Limits Commercial/Industrial Uses to 300k Gallons Per Day
•Applies to all commercial or industrial uses
•Both new or expanding
•Enforcement Mechanism:
•Prevents additions to facilities that would cause them to
exceed threshold or to further exceed threshold
•Examples:
•Large commercial/industrial uses, food processing, water
bottling plants, chemical production, data centers, or other
uses that utilize water for cooling
•Exempts: Residential, institutional, agricultural
•Unlikely to use that much City culinary water
•Other public benefits –public open space, local food
Code Administration
•Land use/permit applicants must certify their water use
•Public Utilities can require a report to verify number
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
ZONING CODE / WHAT DOES IT DO?
•What is 300k gallons per day?
•Half an Olympic sized pool per day
•Only a few uses at/near this level
•Why 300k?
•Aligns with Public Utilities’long term water
resource projections
•Protects water resources
•Allows a wide range of businesses
•Prevents very intense users
•Balanced
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
ZONING CODE / WATER LIMIT
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
TOP 25 WATER USERS BY TYPE
*Based on 6 months of 2021 data from SLC Public Utilities. Data subject to change. Gallons Per Day (Average)2.1m 1.4m
Business Categorized by Land Use Type
EXEMPT AREAS
NWQ & State Lands*
U of U
*Includes State Prison and State and Institutional Trust Lands Administration properties
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: PLNPCM2021-00638 Significant Water Consuming Land Uses Zoning Text
Amendment
STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Echeverria, Senior Planner, Planning Division,
daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com or 801-535-7165; Laura Briefer, Director, Public Utilities
Department, laura.briefer@slcgov.com, 801-483-6741
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the proposed ordinance as recommended by the Planning
Commission.
BUDGET IMPACT: None.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall is proposing zoning amendments that would limit the amount of City
culinary water that commercial and industrial land uses can utilize. In the past year there has been
a growing awareness of the current drought conditions and the drought’s potential long-term
impacts on the City’s water resources. Given these drought conditions and concerns related to
future water resources, the Planning Division and Public Utilities Department developed the
proposed land use amendments that would limit commercial and industrial water use and prevent
future very large water users from being located the City. Such uses may have significant impacts
on the City’s water resources. The water use limit is intended to preserve City water resources in
the long term, while at the same time allowing for the City’s continued economic development.
November 1, 2021
Lisa Shaffer (Nov 2, 2021 12:32 MDT)
11/02/2021
11/02/2021
Proposed Ordinance Water Use Limit
The proposed text amendment implements a 300,000 gallon per day limit on the amount of City
culinary water that any commercial and industrial land uses can utilize. These types of uses are
targeted by the proposed ordinance as many of these land uses have the potential to use significant
amounts of City water. Agricultural, institutional, and residential uses are exempted from the
ordinance, as they generally would not reach the water use threshold and in the very limited cases
where such uses may potentially exceed the threshold, they provide other public good or health
benefits that warrant exemption, such as public recreational space.
The limit affects multiple zones where such uses are allowed. The ordinance would require any
person seeking a building permit for a new land use, or an addition to an existing land use, to verify
that their proposal would not result in a facility that uses over 300,000 gallons per day. Facilities
exceeding this limit would not be allowed. Permit applicants would need to certify their anticipated
use with any permit application, and Public Utilities would be able to require additional
documentation to verify the use numbers provided. Ordinance details, including enforcement
mechanisms, can be found in the full Planning Commission staff report. Please see the “Key
Ordinance Components” section on page 2 of that staff report for those details.
Current Impacted Uses
Two uses in the City currently exceed the threshold, specifically the University of Utah and a
refinery. Both uses have full or partial exemptions from compliance with City zoning regulations
due to other State or Federal regulations. All other commercial and industrial uses in the City
currently use less than the 300,000-gallon per day limit. There are only two existing businesses
that currently exceed 200,000-gallons per day. The City is aware of at least one bottling plant use
currently in the process of obtaining City permits that may exceed the 300,000-gallon limit.
Temporary Ordinance in Effect- January 4th Expiration
In July the City temporarily imposed zoning regulations that prohibit new or expanding land uses
that use more than 300,000 gallons per day. While this is in effect, the City will not issue any
permits for a land use that would violate the regulation. State Code allows the City to impose such
temporarily regulations for a period of 6 months while proposed regulations are working through
the public process to City Council. The 6-month period ends on January 4th. If the City Council
doesn’t adopt the proposed regulations before that date, the temporary regulations will expire on
that date and uses that exceed 300,000 gallons per day will be permitted.
Ordinance Update
Following the Planning Commission recommendation, the Attorney’s Office identified that the
term “institutional uses” was not defined in the Zoning ordinance, which could lead to confusion
on what uses are covered by the institutional use exemption in this code. Due to that, a line was
added to the proposed code that defines “institutional land use” for purposes of the water use
regulation to include government uses, places of worship, and hospitals.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
In early July 2021, the City posted an “Open House” webpage with information regarding the
proposal, including a draft code. Information about the proposal and a link to the webpage were
sent out to City recognized community organizations (RCOs) and the Planning listserv. Two RCOs
requested presentations on the proposal and Staff attended their meetings to discuss the proposal,
specifically the Sugar House Community Council (SHCC) and Glendale Community Council.
Notices were also sent in August to potentially affected businesses and property owners based on
research of City water use data and business license records. Details regarding the noticing and
public input received are located in attachment E of the Planning Commission staff report.
In addition to RCO meetings, Staff attended the September 8th meeting of the City’s Business
Advisory Board to discuss the proposal. At the meeting one board member asked whether the
proposal would affect the Inland Port area and another board member expressed their support for
the proposal. A representative of the City’s Economic Development department also expressed
their support for the proposal, noting that it would provide a water use threshold that City staff
could point to when responding to businesses looking to located here.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the proposal on September 22, 2021. Notice
of the public hearing was sent to the Planning listserv, including all recognized organizations, and
to all businesses/property owners previously notified during the initial public engagement.
At the public hearing, the Commission generally discussed how the ordinance would be enforced
and the basis of the proposed water use threshold. Two individuals spoke during the public
hearing, including a representative of the Utah Department of Agriculture and Foods, who spoke
in support of the agriculture exemption in the ordinance, and a representative of the Marathon
Refinery, who spoke generally about their water use and potential facility additions. Following
discussion, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council adopt the
proposed ordinance changes.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a) PC Agenda for September 22, 2021 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes for September 22, 2021 (Click to Access)
c) PC Staff Report for September 22, 2021 (Click to Access)
EXHIBITS:
1) Chronology
2) Notice of City Council Hearing
3) Original Petition
4) Mailing List
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2021
(An ordinance amending various sections of the Salt Lake City Code
pertaining to land uses that use or consume significant amounts of water
pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00635)
An ordinance amending various sections of the Salt Lake City Code to regulate land uses
that use or consume significant amounts of water as provided herein.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held
a public hearing on September 22, 2021 to consider a request by the Salt Lake City Council (the
“City Council”) to amend the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit land uses that use or consume a
significant amount of water; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held
a public hearing on September 22, 2021 to consider petition number PLNPCM2021-00635 (the
“petition”) initiated by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin Mendenhall, to amend Salt Lake City Code to
prohibit land uses that use or consume a significant amount of water; and
WHEREAS, at its September 22, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission voted in favor
of forwarding a positive recommendation of approval to the City Council to adopt changes to the
Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the prohibition of land uses which use or consume significant
amounts of water; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to modify its land use regulations to as
provided herein; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that while the city has adequate water
resources for the current needs of the city’s customers in the city’s designated water service area
2
and the city holds water interests that can be developed in the future for the benefit of its water
customers, the city’s water resource supply is not unlimited and, furthermore changing
environmental conditions are placing significant pressure on the city’s water resources;
WHEREAS, the majority of the city’s water resources emanate from the watershed that
contribute water to Great Salt Lake, and the city is very concerned that a shrinking Great Salt
Lake has significant negative ramifications to the health and welfare of the public and
environment; and
WHEREAS, immediate steps are appropriate to limit use of the city’s water resources by
water consumers that would consume very large quantities of water that would exacerbate the
pressures on the city’s water resources and the Great Salt Lake system ; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to enact land use regulations that protect
and preserve the availability of the city to provide water to its current customers and to future
development in the city that will promote the public health, safety and general welfare of the
present and future city residents; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that modification of its land use regulations
is just one of a number of methods in which Salt Lake City currently regulates water use or
consumption and contemplates that the city will continue to explore further regulatory methods
to help ensure a fair and equitable use of the city’s finite resource; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds, after holding a public hearing on this
matter, that adopting this ordinance promotes the health, safety, and public welfare of the
citizens of the city.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
3
SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.33. That Chapter
21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be and hereby is amended to read and
appear as follows:
SECTION:
21A.33.010: General Provisions
21A.33.020: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts
21A.33.030: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts
21A.33.035: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts
21A.33.040: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts
21A.33.050: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts
21A.33.060: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District
21A.33.070: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts
21A.33.080: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts
21A.33.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS:
A. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in Sections 21A.33.020,
21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and
21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted
provided that they comply with the general standards set forth in Part IV of this title and
all other applicable requirements of this title.
B. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in Sections 21A.33.020,
21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and
21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed
provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses
set forth in Chapter 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable
requirements of this title.
C. Uses Not Permitted: Any use specifically listed without a "P" or a "C" designated in the
table of permitted and conditional uses for a district shall not be allowed in that zoning
district.
D. Prohibited Uses: The following land uses are prohibited in all zoning districts:
1. Commercial and Industrial Land Uses That Exceed 300,000 Gallons of Water per Day.
a. New Land Uses: Any new commercial or industrial land use that consumes or uses
more than an annual average of 300,000 gallons of potable water per day is prohibited
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2021
(An ordinance amending various sections of the Salt Lake City Code
pertaining to land uses that use or consume significant amounts of water
pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00635)
An ordinance amending various sections of the Salt Lake City Code to regulate land uses
that use or consume significant amounts of water as provided herein.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held
a public hearing on September 22, 2021 to consider a request by the Salt Lake City Council (the
“City Council”) to amend the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit land uses that use or consume a
significant amount of water; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held
a public hearing on September 22, 2021 to consider petition number PLNPCM2021-00635 (the
“petition”) initiated by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin Mendenhall, to amend Salt Lake City Code to
prohibit land uses that use or consume a significant amount of water; and
WHEREAS, at its September 22, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission voted in favor
of forwarding a positive recommendation of approval to the City Council to adopt changes to the
Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the prohibition of land uses which use or consume significant
amounts of water; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to modify its land use regulations to as
provided herein; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that while the city has adequate water
resources for the current needs of the city’s customers in the city’s designated water service area
2
and the city holds water interests that can be developed in the future for the benefit of its water
customers, the city’s water resource supply is not unlimited and, furthermore changing
environmental conditions are placing significant pressure on the city’s water resources;
WHEREAS, the majority of the city’s water resources emanate from the watershed that
contribute water to Great Salt Lake, and the city is very concerned that a shrinking Great Salt
Lake has significant negative ramifications to the health and welfare of the public and
environment; and
WHEREAS, immediate steps are appropriate to limit use of the city’s water resources by
water consumers that would consume very large quantities of water that would exacerbate the
pressures on the city’s water resources and the Great Salt Lake system ; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to enact land use regulations that protect
and preserve the availability of the city to provide water to its current customers and to future
development in the city that will promote the public health, safety and general welfare of the
present and future city residents; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that modification of its land use regulations
is just one of a number of methods in which Salt Lake City currently regulates water use or
consumption and contemplates that the city will continue to explore further regulatory methods
to help ensure a fair and equitable use of the city’s finite resource; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds, after holding a public hearing on this
matter, that adopting this ordinance promotes the health, safety, and public welfare of the
citizens of the city.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
3
SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.33. That Chapter
21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be and hereby is amended to read and
appear as follows:
SECTION:
21A.33.010: General Provisions
21A.33.020: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts
21A.33.030: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts
21A.33.035: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts
21A.33.040: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts
21A.33.050: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts
21A.33.060: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District
21A.33.070: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts
21A.33.080: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts
21A.33.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS:
A. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in Sections 21A.33.020,
21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and
21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted
provided that they comply with the general standards set forth in Part IV of this title and
all other applicable requirements of this title.
B. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in Sections 21A.33.020,
21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and
21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed
provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses
set forth in Chapter 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable
requirements of this title.
C. Uses Not Permitted: Any use specifically listed without a "P" or a "C" designated in the
table of permitted and conditional uses for a district shall not be allowed in that zoning
district.
D. Prohibited Uses: The following land uses are prohibited in all zoning districts:
1. Commercial and Industrial Land Uses That Exceed 300,000 Gallons of Water per Day.
a. New Land Uses: Any new commercial or industrial land use that consumes or uses
more than an annual average of 300,000 gallons of potable water per day is prohibited
4
in all zoning districts. The use and consumption limit is based on the total use from all
water meters that serve the land use.
b. Expansions of Existing Uses: No commercial or industrial land use shall expand to an
extent that increases its daily potable water consumption or use to exceed an annual
average of 300,000 gallons of potable water per day. Notwithstanding the provisions
of Subsection 21A.38.040.H, an existing land use that exceeds the water use threshold
may not expand if the expansion will result in a net increase in water consumption or
use. The use and consumption limit is based on the total use from all water meters that
serve the land use.
c. Water Use Report Required: A land use applicant shall certify the anticipated daily
water use of the proposed land use in a manner satisfactory to the Department of
Public Utilities. The Department of Public Utilities may require an anticipated daily
water use report of any land use applicant proposing a new use or expansion of an
existing use.
d. Exemption: Agricultural, residential, and institutional land uses are not subject to the
regulations of this subsection. For purposes of this section, an institutional land use
includes government owned or operated facilities, places of worship, and hospitals.
2. Reserved.
4
in all zoning districts. The use and consumption limit is based on the total use from all
water meters that serve the land use.
b. Expansions of Existing Uses: No commercial or industrial land use shall expand to an
extent that increases its daily potable water consumption or use to exceed an annual
average of 300,000 gallons of potable water per day. Notwithstanding the provisions
of Subsection 21A.38.040.H, an existing land use that exceeds the water use threshold
may not expand if the expansion will result in a net increase in water consumption or
use. The use and consumption limit is based on the total use from all water meters that
serve the land use.
c. Water Use Report Required: A land use applicant shall certify the anticipated daily
water use of the proposed land use in a manner satisfactory to the Department of
Public Utilities. The Department of Public Utilities may require an anticipated daily
water use report of any land use applicant proposing a new use or expansion of an
existing use.
d. Exemption: Agricultural, residential, and institutional land uses are not subject to the
regulations of this subsection. For purposes of this section, an institutional land use
includes government owned or operated facilities, places of worship, and hospitals.
2. Reserved.
5
21A.33.020: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS:
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS in PDF, click HERE
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District
FR-1/
43,560
FR-2/
21,780
FR-3/
12,000
R-1/
12,000
R-1/
7,000
R-1/
5,000
SR-1 SR-2 SR-3 R-2 RMF-
30
MF-35 RMF-
45
RMF-
75
RB R-MU-
35
R-MU-
45
R-MU RO
Accessory use, except those
that are otherwise
specifically regulated
elsewhere in this title
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Adaptive reuse of a
landmark site
C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 P P P P P6
Alcohol, bar establishment
(2,500 square feet or less in
floor area)
C9 C9 C9 C9
Alcohol, brewpub (2,500
square feet or less in floor
area)
C9 C9 C9
Alcohol, tavern (2,500
square feet or less in floor
area)
C9
Animal, veterinary office C C C P P6
Art gallery P P P P P
Artisan food production
(2,500 square feet or less in
floor area)
P3 P3 P3 P3 P
6
Bed and breakfast inn P P P P
Bed and breakfast manor P
Clinic (medical, dental) P P P P P6
Commercial food
preparation
P21 P21 P21 P21 P21
Community garden C C C C C C C C C P P P P P P P P P
Community recreation
center
C
Crematorium C C C
Daycare center, adult C P P P P P P
Daycare center, child C18 C1 8 C18 C18 C1 8 C1 8 C18 C18 C18 P P P P P P
Daycare, nonregistered
home daycare
P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18
Daycare, registered home
daycare or preschool
P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18
Dwelling, accessory guest
and servant’s quarter
P11 P11 P11
Dwelling, accessory unit C C C C C C P P P P P P P P P P P P
Dwelling, assisted living
facility (large)
C P P C P P
Dwelling, assisted living
facility (limited capacity)
C C C C C C C C C P P P P P P P P
7
Dwelling, assisted living
facility (small)
P P P P P P
Dwelling, congregate care
facility (large)
C C C C C C C
Dwelling, congregate care
facility (small)
C C C C C C C C C C P P P P P P P P
Dwelling; dormitory,
fraternity, sorority
P12
Dwelling, group home
(large)
C C C C C14 C C C C14
Dwelling, group home
(small)
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P15 P P P P15
Dwelling, manufactured
home
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Dwelling, multi- family P P P P P P P P P
Dwelling, residential
support (large)
C C C C C16
Dwelling, residential
support (small)
C C P C C P P17
Dwelling, rooming
(boarding) house
C P C C C P P
Dwelling, single- family
(attached)
P P P P P P P P P P
Dwelling, single- family
(detached)
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
8
Dwelling, twin home and
two- family
P P P2 P P P P P P P
Financial institution P P P P6
Funeral home P P P P
Governmental facility C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C6
Home occupation P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20
Laboratory, medical related P21 P21 P21 P21 P21
Library C C C C C
Mixed use development P1 P P P P
Mobile food business
(operation on private
property)
P P P
Municipal service use,
including city utility use and
police and fire station
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
Museum P C P P P
Nursing care facility P P P P P
Office, excluding medical
and dental clinic and office
P P P P P6
Open space on lots less than
4 acres in size
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Park P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Parking, off site (to support
nonconforming uses in a
C C C C C
9
residential zone or uses in
the CN or CB zones)
Parking, park and ride lot
shared with existing use
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Place of worship on lots less
than 4 acres in size
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
Reception center P P P
Recreation (indoor) P P P P P
Research and development
facility
P21 P21
Restaurant P P P P P
Restaurant with drive-
through facility
Retail goods establishment P P P P
Retail goods establishment,
plant and garden shop with
outdoor retail sales area
P P P P
Retail service establishment P P P P
School, music conservatory P C C P
School, professional and
vocational
P C C P P6
School, seminary and
religious institute
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
Seasonal farm stand P P P P P
10
Studio, art P P P P P
Technology facility P21 P21 P21 P21
Temporary use of closed
schools and churches
C19 C19 C19 C19 C1 9 C1 9 C19 C1 9 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19
Theater, live performance C1 3 C13 C13 C13 C1 3
Theater, movie C C C C C
Urban farm P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Utility, building or structure P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5, 7
Utility, transmission wire,
line, pipe or pole
P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5
Wireless
telecommunications facility
(see Section 21A.40.090,
Table 21A.40.090.E of this
title)
Qualifying provisions:
1. A single apartment unit may be located above first floor retail/office.
2. Provided that no more than 2 two-family buildings are located adjacent to one another and no more than 3 such dwellings are located along the same block face (within
subdivisions approved after April 12, 1995).
3. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales.
4. Reserved.
5. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations.
6. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building’s footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of
the building’s footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review.
7. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.02.050 of this title.
11
8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.24.010.S of this title.
9. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title.
10. In the RB zoning district, the total square footage, including patio space, shall not exceed 2,200 square feet in total. Total square footage will include a maximum 1,750
square feet of floor space within a business and a maximum of 450 square feet in an outdoor patio area.
11. Accessory guest or servant’s quarters must be located within the buildable area on the lot.
12. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.150 of this title.
13. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district.
14. Large group homes established in the RB and RO districts shall be located above the ground floor.
15. Small group homes established in the RB and RO districts shall be located above the ground floor.
16. Large residential support established in RO districts shall be located above the ground floor.
17. Small residential support established in RO districts shall be located above the ground floor.
18. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title.
19. Subject to Section 21A.36.170 of this title.
20. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title.
21. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1.
12
21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR COMMERCIAL
DISTRICTS:
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS in PDF, click HERE
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District
CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB
Accessory use, except those that are specifically regulated
elsewhere in this title
P P P P P P P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P P P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment (2,500 square feet or less in floor
area)
C10,11 C10,11 P10 P10 P10 P10
Bar establishment (more than 2,500 square feet in floor
area)
P10 C10 P10 P10
Brewpub (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) C10,11 P10 P10 P10 P10
Brewpub (more than 2,500 square feet in floor area) P10 C10 P10 P10
Distillery P16, 23
Tavern (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) C10,11 P10 P10 P10 P10
Tavern (more than 2,500 square feet in floor area) P10 C10 P10 P10
Ambulance service (indoor) P P P P
Ambulance service (outdoor) P6 P6 P6 P
Amusement park P P
Animal:
Cremation service
P P
Kennel P
Pet cemetery P4
Veterinary office C P P P P P
Antenna, communication tower P P P P P
13
Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum
building height in the zone
C C C C C
Art gallery P P P P P P P
Artisan food production (2,500 square feet or less in floor
area)
P20 P20 P P P20 P
Artisan food production (more than 2,500 square feet in
floor area)
P23 P23 P23
Auction (outdoor) P P
Auditorium P P P P
Bakery, commercial P23
Bed and breakfast P P P P P P P14
Bed and breakfast inn P P P P P P
Bed and breakfast manor C3 C3 P P P
Bio-medical facility P22, 23 P22, 23 P22, 23 P22, 23
Blacksmith shop P23
Blood donation center C P
Brewery P23
Bus line station/terminal P P
Bus line yard and repair facility P
Car wash P P P
Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience
store that sells gas
P P P P
Check cashing/payday loan business P8 P8
Clinic (medical, dental) P P P P P P
Commercial food preparation P23 P23 P23 P23 P23 P23
Community correctional facility, large
Community correctional facility, small C7,17
Community garden P P P P P P P
Contractor’s yard/office C P
14
Crematorium C C C C
Daycare center, adult P P P P P P
Daycare center, child P P P P P P
Daycare, nonregistered home daycare or preschool P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18
Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18
Dwelling:
Assisted living facility (large) P P P P
Assisted living facility (small) P P P P
Congregate care facility (large) C C C C
Congregate care facility (small) P
Group home (large) P C C
Group home (small) when located above or below first
story office, retail, or commercial use, or on the first
story where the unit is not located adjacent to street
frontage
P P P P P P P
Living quarter for caretaker or security guard P P P P P P
Manufactured home P
Multi-family P P P P P P
Residential support (large) C C
Residential support (small) C C
Rooming (boarding) house P P P P P
Single-family attached P
Single-family detached P
Single room occupancy
Twin home P
Two-family P
Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) P P
Farmers’ market C C P P
15
Financial institution P P P P P P
Financial institution with drive-through facility P9 P9 P9 P9 P9
Flea market (indoor) P P P P
Flea market (outdoor) P
Funeral home P P P P
Gas station C P P P P
Government facility C C C C C C
Government facility requiring special design features for
security purposes
P P P P P P
Home occupation P19 P19 P19 P19 P19 P19 P19
Homeless resource center C21
Homeless shelter C21
Hotel/motel C P P P
House museum in landmark sites (see
Subsection 21A.24.010.S of this title)
C
Impound lot C12
Industrial assembly P23
Intermodal transit passenger hub P
Laboratory, medical related P23 P23 P23 P23 P23
Large wind energy system P P P
Laundry, commercial P23
Library P P P P P P C
Limousine service (large) P
Limousine service (small) C C P
Manufactured/mobile home sales and service P
Mixed use development P P P P P P P13
Mobile food business (operation on private property) P P P P P P
16
Municipal service uses, including city utility uses and
police and fire stations
C C C C C C
Museum P P P P P P P
Nursing care facility P P P
Office P P P P P P P15
Office, single practitioner medical, dental, and health P
Offices and reception centers in landmark sites (see
Subsection 21A.24.010.S of this title)
C
Open space P P P P P P
Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P
Park P P P P P P P
Parking:
Commercial C P P
Off site C P P P P P
Park and ride lot C C P P
Park and ride lot shared with existing use P P P P P
Place of worship on lot less than 4 acres in size P P P P P P C
Radio, television station P P P P
Reception center P P P P P
Recreation (indoor) P P P P P P P
Recreation (outdoor) C C P
Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre) C
Recycling collection station P P P P P P
Research and development facility P23 P23 P23 P23
Restaurant P P P P P P
Restaurant with drive-through facility P9 P9 P9 P9 P9
Retail goods establishment P P P P P P P
Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area P P P P P P P
17
With drive-through facility P9 P9 P9 P9 P9
Retail service establishment P P P P P P P
Furniture repair shop C P P P P P
With drive-through facility P9 P9 P9 P9 P9
Reverse vending machine P P P P P P
Sales and display (outdoor) P P P P P P
School:
College or university P P P P P
Music conservatory P P P P P
Professional and vocational P P P P P
Seminary and religious institute P P P P P C
Seasonal farm stand P P P P P P
Sexually oriented business P5
Sign painting/fabrication P
Small brewery C23 P23
Solar array P23
Storage (outdoor) C P
Storage, public (outdoor) C P
Storage, self P P
Store:
Department P P
Mass merchandising P P P
Pawnshop P
Specialty P P P P
Superstore and hypermarket P P
Warehouse club P
Studio, art P P P P P P P
18
Studio, motion picture P
Taxicab facility P
Technology facility P23 P23 P23 P23
Theater, live performance P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Theater, movie C P P P P
Urban farm P P P P P P
Utility, building or structure P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2
Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe, or pole P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2
Vehicle:
Auction P
Automobile repair (major) P P
Automobile repair (minor) C P P P P P
Automobile sales/rental and service P P
Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) P23
Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service P P
Truck repair (large) P
Truck sales and rental (large) P P
Vending cart, private property P
Warehouse P23 P23
Welding shop P
Wholesale distribution P23 P23
Wireless telecommunications facility (see
Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title)
C
Woodworking mill P23
Qualifying provisions:
1. Development in the CS district shall be subject to planned development approval pursuant to the provisions
of Chapter 21A.55 of this title. Certain developments in the CSHBD zone shall be subject to the design review
process pursuant to the provisions of Subsection 21A.26.060.D and Chapter 21A.59 of this title.
19
2. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations.
3. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources (see
Subsections 21A.24.010.S and 21A.26.010.K of this title).
4. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval.
5. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Section 21A.36.140 of this title.
6. Greater than 3 ambulances at location require a conditional use.
7. A community correctional facility is considered an institutional use and any such facility located within the AFPP
Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District is subject to the land use and sound attenuation standards for
institutional uses of the applicable Airport influence zone within Section 21A.34.040 of this title.
8. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than 1/2 mile of other check cashing/payday loan
businesses.
9. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive-through use regulations.
10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this
title.
11. In CN and CB zoning districts, the total square footage, including patio space, shall not exceed 2,200 square feet
in total. Total square footage will include a maximum 1,750 square feet of floor space within a business and a
maximum of 450 square feet in an outdoor patio area.
12. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district.
13. Residential units may be located above or below first floor retail/office.
14. In the SNB zoning district, bed and breakfast use is only allowed in a landmark site.
15. Medical and dental offices are not allowed in the SNB zoning district, except for single practitioner medical,
dental and health offices.
16. Permitted in the CG zoning district only when associated with an on site food service establishment.
17. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of any residential zoning district boundary and subject to Section 21A.36.110 of this
title.
18. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title.
19. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to
Section 21A.36.030 of this title.
20. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales.
21. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.350 of this title, the city may not prohibit
construction of a homeless resource center or homeless shelter if the site is approved by and receives funding
through the State Homeless Coordinating Committee, with the concurrence of the Housing and Community
Development Division within the Department of Workforce Services, in accordance with Section 35A-8-604 of
the Utah Code.
22. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules.
23. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1.
20
21A.33.035: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR TRANSIT STATION AREA
DISTRICTS:
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR TRANSIT STATION AREA DISTRICTS in PDF,
click HERE
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District
TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP
Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition
Accessory use, except those
that are specifically regulated
elsewhere in this title
P P P P P P P P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark
site
P P P P P P P P
Agricultural use P P P P P P P P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment (2,500
square feet or less in floor
area)
P P P P P P P P
Bar establishment (more
than 2,500 square feet in
floor area)
P C P C P C P C
Brewpub (2,500 square feet
or less in floor area)
P P P P P P P P
Brewpub (more than 2,500
square feet in floor area)
P C P C P C P C
Distillery P12 C12 P12 C12 P12 P12 P12 C12
Tavern (2,500 square feet
or less in floor area)
P P P P P P P P
Tavern (more than 2,500
square feet in floor area)
P C P C P C P C
Winery P12 C12 P12 C12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Amphitheater, formal C C
Amphitheater, informal C C
21
Amusement park C C
Animal:
Cremation service P P P P P P P P
Kennel P P P P
Pet cemetery1 P1 P1 P1 P1
Stable, public P P
Veterinary office P P P P P P P P
Antenna, communication
tower
P P P P P P P P
Antenna, communication
tower, exceeding the
maximum building height in
the zone
C C C C C C C C
Art gallery P P P P P P P P
Artisan food production P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Auction (indoor) P P P P
Auditorium P P
Bakery, commercial P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Bed and breakfast P P P P P P P P
Bed and breakfast inn P P P P P P P P
Bed and breakfast manor P P P P P P P P
Bio-medical facility P11,12 P11,12 P11,12 P11,12
Blood donation center P P P P P P P P
Botanical garden P P P P P P P P
Brewery C12 C12 C12 C12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Car wash P P
Car wash as accessory use to
gas station or convenience
store that sells gas
P P
Clinic (medical, dental) P P P P P P P P
22
Commercial food preparation P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Community correctional
facility, small2,8
C2,8
Community garden P P P P P P P P
Convent/monastery P P P P P P P P
Convention center C C
Crematorium P P P P P P
Daycare center, adult P P P P P P P P
Daycare center, child P P P P P P P P
Daycare, nonregistered home
daycare or preschool
P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6
Daycare, registered home
daycare or preschool
P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6
Dwelling:
Artists’ loft/studio P P P P P P P P
Assisted living facility
(large)
P P P P P P P P
Assisted living facility
(small)
P P P P P P P P
Congregate care facility
(large)
C C C C C C C C
Congregate care facility
(small)
P P P P P P P P
Group home (large) P P P P P P P P
Group home (small) P P P P P P P P
Living quarter for caretaker
or security guard
P P P P P P P P
Manufactured home P P P P P P P P
Multi-family P P P P P P P P
Residential support (large) P P P P P P P P
Residential support (small) P P P P P P P P
23
Rooming (boarding) house P P P P P P P P
Single-family attached P P P P P P P P
Single-family detached P P P P
Single room occupancy P P P P P P P P
Twin home P P P P P P P P
Two-family P P P P P P P P
Exhibition hall C C
Farmers’ market P P P P P P P P
Financial institution P P P P P P P P
Financial institution with
drive-through facility
P P
Flea market (indoor) P P P P P P P P
Flea market (outdoor) P P
Food processing P12 P12 P12 P12
Funeral home P P P P P P P P
Gas station P P
Government facility P P P P P P P P
Government facility
requiring special design
features for security purposes
P P P P P P P P
Grain elevator P P P P
Greenhouse P P P P P P P P
Home occupation P7 P7 P7 P7 P7 P7 P7 P7
Hospital, including accessory
lodging facility
P P P P P P P P
Hotel/motel P P P P P P P P
House museum in landmark
sites (see
Subsection 21A.24.010.S of
this title)
P P P P P P P P
24
Industrial assembly P12 P12 P12 P12
Laboratory, medical related P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Laundry, commercial P12 P12
Library P P P P P P P P
Light manufacturing P12 P12 P12 P12
Meeting hall of membership
organization
P P P P P P P P
Mixed use development P P P P P P P P
Mobile food business
(operating on private
property)
P P P P P P P P
Mobile food business
(operation in public right- of-
way)
P P P P P P P P
Mobile food court P P P P P P
Municipal service uses,
including city utility uses and
police and fire stations
P P P P P P P P
Museum P P P P P P P P
Nursing care facility P P P P P P P P
Office P P P P P P P P
Office, publishing company P P P P P P P P
Office, single practitioner
medical, dental, and health
P P P P P P P P
Offices and reception centers
in landmark sites (see
Subsection 21A.24.010.S of
this title)
P P P P P P P P
Open space P P P P P P P P
Park P P P P P P P P
Parking:
Commercial (if located in a
parking structure)
P P P P P P P
25
Commercial (surface lot)3 P3 P3
Off site3 P3 P3 P3 P3 P3 P3 P7 P3
Park and ride lot3 P3 P3
Park and ride lot shared
with existing use
P P
Performing arts production
facility
P P P P P P P P
Philanthropic use P P P P P P P P
Photo finishing lab P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Place of worship P P P P P P P P
Printing plant P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Radio, television station P P P P P P
Railroad passenger station P P P P P P P P
Reception center P P P P P P P P
Recreation (indoor) P P P P P P P P
Recreation (outdoor) P P P P P P P P
Recycling collection station P P P P P P P P
Research and development
facility
P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Restaurant P P P P P P P P
Restaurant with drive-
through facility9
C10
Retail goods establishment P P P P P P P P
Plant and garden shop with
outdoor retail sales area
P P P P P P P P
With drive-through facility
Retail service establishment P P P P P P P P
Furniture repair shop P P P P P P P P
Sales and display (outdoor) P P P P P P P P
26
School:
College or university P P P P P P P P
Music conservatory P P P P P P P P
Professional and vocational P P P P P P P P
Seminary and religious
institute
P P P P P P P P
Seasonal farm stand P P P P P P P P
Small brewery P12 C12 P12 C12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Social service mission and
charity dining hall
C C C C P P P P
Solar array P12 P12 P12 P12
Stadium C C C C C C
Storage, self P P P P
Store:
Convenience P P P P P P P P
Department P P P P P P P P
Mass merchandising P P P P P P P P
Specialty P P P P P P P P
Superstore and
hypermarket
P P
Warehouse club P P
Studio, art P P P P P P P P
Studio, motion picture P P P P
Technology facility P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Theater, live performance4 P4 C4 P4 C4 P4 P4 P4 P4
Theater, movie P P P P P P
Urban farm P P P P P P P P
Utility, building or structure5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5
27
Utility, transmission wire,
line, pipe, or pole5
P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5
Vehicle:
Automobile repair (minor) P P
Vending cart, private
property
P P P P P P P P
Warehouse P12 P12
Wholesale distribution P12
Wireless telecommunications
facility (see
Section 21A.40.090 of this
title)
P P P P P P P P
Wireless telecommunications
facility, exceeding the
maximum building height of
the zone (see
Section 21A.40.090 of this
title)
C C C C C C C C
Woodworking mill P12 P12 P12
Zoological park C C
Qualifying provisions for specific land uses:
1. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval.
2. A community correctional facility is considered an institutional use and any such facility located within the AFPP
Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District is subject to the land use and sound attenuation standards for
institutional uses of the applicable Airport influence zone within Section 21A.34.040 of this title.
3. Surface parking lots as a principal use located on a lot that has frontage on a public street are prohibited.
4. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district.
5. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations.
6. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title.
7. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to
Section 21A.36.030 of this title.
8. Subject to Section 21A.36.110 of this title.
9. Drive-through windows are prohibited on any public street facing facade and automobile stacking is prohibited
between public street facing facades and the adjacent public right-of-way.
10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 for drive-through use regulations.
28
11. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules.
12. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1.
21A.33.040: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MANUFACTURING
DISTRICTS:
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MANUFACTURING DISTRICTS in PDF,
click HERE.
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District M-1 M-2
Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this
title
P P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark site C C7
Agricultural use P P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment C6,10 C6,10
Brewpub P6,10 P6,10
Distillery P19 P19
Tavern C6,10 C6,10
Winery P19 P19
Ambulance services (indoor and/or outdoor) P P
Animal:
Cremation service P P
Kennel P13 P
Pet cemetery P2 P2
Pound P12,13 P12
Raising of furbearing animals C P
Stockyard C12 P12
Veterinary office P P
Antenna, communication tower P P
Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C C
Artisan food production P19 P19
Bakery, commercial P19 P19
Bio-medical facility P18,19 P18,19
29
Blacksmith shop P19 P19
Bottling plant P19,20 P19,20
Brewery P19 P19
Building materials distribution P P
Bus line station/terminal P P
Bus line yard and repair facility P12 P
Cannabis production establishment P P
Check cashing/payday loan business P9
Chemical manufacturing and/or storage C19
Commercial food preparation P19 P19
Community correctional facility, large C8,16
Community correctional facility, small C8,16
Community garden P
Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing C12,13,19 P12,19
Contractor’s yard/office P P
Crematorium P P
Data center P19
Daycare center, adult P
Daycare center, child P
Drop forge industry P19
Dwelling, living quarters for caretaker or security guard, limited to uses on lots 1 acre
in size or larger and is accessory to a principal use allowed by the zoning district
P P
Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) P P
Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) P P
Explosive manufacturing and storage C12,19
Financial institution with or without drive-through facility P11
Flammable liquids or gases, heating fuel distribution and storage P12
Food processing P19 P19
Gas station P P
Golf course P19
Government facility P P
Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P P
Grain elevator C12 P
Greenhouse P
Heavy manufacturing P12,19
Home occupation P15 P15
30
Hotel/motel P
Impound lot P12 P12
Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste C12,19
Industrial assembly P19 P19
Laboratory, medical related P19 P19
Large wind energy system P13,14 P
Laundry, commercial P19 P19
Light manufacturing P19 P19
Limousine service P P
Mobile food business (operation in the public right- of-way) P P
Mobile food business (operation on private property) P P
Mobile food court P P
Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P
Office P
Office, publishing company P
Open space P P
Package delivery facility P P
Paint manufacturing P19
Park P P
Parking:
Commercial P
Off site P P
Park and ride lot P P
Park and ride lot shared with existing use P P
Photo finishing lab P19 P19
Poultry farm or processing plant P12,19
Printing plant P19
Radio, television station P
Railroad, freight terminal facility C4 C4
Railroad, repair shop C19 P19
Recreation (indoor) P
Recreation (outdoor) P
Recycling:
Collection station P P
Processing center (indoor) P19 P19
31
Processing center (outdoor) C12,13,14,19 P12,19
Refinery, petroleum products C12,19
Restaurant with or without drive-through facilities P11
Research and development facility P19 P19
Retail goods establishment with or without drive- through facility P11
Retail service establishment:
Electronic repair shop P
Furniture repair shop P P
Upholstery shop P
Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution C P
School:
Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) P
Professional and vocational (without outdoor activities) P
Seminary and religious institute P
Seasonal farm stand P P
Sexually oriented business P5 P5
Sign painting/fabrication P P
Slaughterhouse P12
Small brewery P19 P19
Solar array P17,19 P19
Storage and display (outdoor) P P
Storage, public (outdoor) P P
Storage, self P P
Store, convenience P P
Studio, motion picture P
Taxicab facility P P
Technology facility P19
Tire distribution retail/wholesale P P
Truck freight terminal P12 P12
Urban farm P P
Utility:
Building or structure P P
Electric generation facility C3,12,19 C3,12,19
Sewage treatment plant C P
Solid waste transfer station C12 P12
32
Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P1 P1
Vehicle:
Auction P P
Automobile and truck repair P P
Automobile and truck sales and rental (including large truck) P P
Automobile part sales P P
Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) P19 P19
Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) C 12,13,14,19 P12,19
Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service P P
Truck repair (large) P P
Vending cart, private property P P
Warehouse P19 P19
Welding shop P19 P19
Wholesale distribution P19 P19
Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E.
of this title)
Woodworking mill P19 P19
Qualifying provisions:
1. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations.
2. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval.
3. Electric generating facilities shall be located within 2,640 feet of an existing 138 kV or larger electric power
transmission line.
4. No railroad freight terminal facility shall be located within 1 mile of a residential zoning district.
5. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Section 21A.36.140 of this title.
6. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the
place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval.
7. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building’s
footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the building’s footprint or new office building
construction are subject to a design review.
8. A community correctional facility is considered an institutional use and any such facility located within the AFPP
Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District is subject to the land use and sound attenuation standards for
institutional uses of the applicable Airport influence zone within Section 21A.34.040 of this title.
9. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than 1/2 mile of other check cashing/payday loan
businesses.
10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this
title.
33
11. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive- through use regulations.
12. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district.
13. Prohibited within the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area of the Northwest Quadrant Overlay District.
14. Prohibited within the Development Area of the Northwest Quadrant Overlay District.
15. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to
Section 21A.36.030 of this title.
16. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of any residential zoning district boundary and subject to Section 21A.36.110 of this
title.
17. Prior to issuance of a building permit in the Development Area and the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area of the
Northwest Quadrant Overlay, consultation with the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources is required to obtain
recommendations on siting and equipment types for all solar arrays on a particular property to mitigate impacts to
wildlife.
18. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules.
19. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1.
20. Prohibited in the IP Inland Port Overlay District. See Subsection 21A.34.150.B.2.f.
21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS:
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS in PDF, click HERE
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District
D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4
Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically
regulated elsewhere in this title
P P P P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P4
Alcohol:
Bar establishment (indoor) P6 C6 C6 P6
Bar establishment (outdoor) P6 C6 C6 P6
Brewpub (indoor) P6 P6 P6 P6
Brewpub (outdoor) P6 P6 P6 P6
Tavern (indoor) P6 C6 C6 P6
Tavern (outdoor) P6 C6 C6 P6
Animal, veterinary office P P
34
Antenna, communication tower P P P P
Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum
building height
C C C C
Art gallery P P P P
Artisan food production P 14,18 P18 P18 P18
Bed and breakfast P P P P
Bed and breakfast inn P P P P
Bed and breakfast manor P P P P
Bio-medical facility P17,18 P17,18 P17,18 P17,18
Blood donation center P
Bus line station/terminal P7 P7 P7 P7
Bus line yard and repair facility P
Car wash P3
Check cashing/payday loan business P5
Clinic (medical, dental) P P P P
Commercial food preparation P18 P18 P18 P18
Community garden P P P P
Convention center P
Crematorium P P P
Daycare center, adult P P P P
Daycare center, child P P P P
Daycare, nonregistered home daycare P 12 P 12 P 12 P 12
Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P 12 P 12 P 12 P 12
Dwelling:
Artists’ loft/studio P P P P
Assisted living facility (large) P P P P
Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P P P
Assisted living facility (small) P P P P
Congregate care facility (large) C C C C
Congregate care facility (small) P P P P
Group home (large) C C
Group home (small) P P P P
Multi-family P P P P
Residential support (large) C C
Residential support (small) C C
Exhibition hall P
35
Farmers’ market P
Financial institution P P P P
Financial institution with drive-through facility P8 P8
Funeral home P P P
Gas station P P7 P7
Government facility C C C C
Government facility requiring special design features for
security purposes
P7 P7
Heliport, accessory C C C
Home occupation P 13 P 13 P 13 P 13
Homeless resource center C 15 C 15
Homeless shelter C 15 C 15
Hotel/motel P P P P
Industrial assembly C18 C18
Laboratory, medical related P18 P18 P18 P18
Laundry, commercial P18
Library P P P P
Limousine service P
Mixed use development P P P P
Mobile food business (operation in the public right-of-way) P P P P
Mobile food business (operation on private property) P P P P
Mobile food court P P P P
Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police
and fire stations
P P P P
Museum P P P P
Office P P P P
Office, publishing company P P P P
Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P7 P7 P7 P7
Park P P P P
Parking, commercial C P C C
Parking, off site P P P P
Performing arts production facility P P P P
Place of worship P11 P11 P11 P11
Radio, television station P P P
Railroad, passenger station P P P P
Reception center P P P P
36
Recreation (indoor) P P P P
Recreation (outdoor) P
Research and development facility P18 P18 P18 P18
Restaurant P P P P
Restaurant with drive-through facility P8
Retail goods establishment P P P P
Retail service establishment P P P P
Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P P
Sales and display (outdoor) P P P P
School:
College or university P P P P
K - 12 private P P
K - 12 public P P
Music conservatory P P P P
Professional and vocational P P P P
Seminary and religious institute P P P P
Small brewery C18
Social service mission and charity dining hall C C
Stadium C C C
Storage, self P 16 P P
Store:
Department P P P
Fashion oriented department P2
Mass merchandising P P P
Pawnshop P
Specialty P P P
Superstore and hypermarket P
Studio, art P P P P
Technology facility P18 P18 P18 P18
Theater, live performance P9 P9 P9 P9
Theater, movie P P P P
Utility, buildings or structure P1 P1 P1 P1
Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P1 P1 P1 P1
Vehicle:
Automobile repair (major) P P7 P7
37
Automobile repair (minor) P P7 P7
Automobile sales/rental and service P10 P P10
Vending cart, private property P P P P
Vending cart, public property
Warehouse P18
Warehouse, accessory P P
Wholesale distribution P18
Wireless telecommunications facility (see
Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title)
Qualifying provisions:
1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title.
2. Uses allowed only within the boundaries and subject to the provisions of the Downtown Main Street Core
Overlay District (Section 21A.34.110 of this title).
3. A car wash located within 165 feet (including streets) of a residential use shall not be allowed.
4. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building’s
footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the building’s footprint or new office building
construction are subject to a design review (Chapter 21A.59 of this title).
5. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than 1/2 mile of other check cashing/payday loan
businesses.
6. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this
title.
7. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Chapter 21A.59, “Design Review”, of this title.
8. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive-through use regulations.
9. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district.
10. Must be located in a fully enclosed building and entirely indoors.
11. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the
place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval.
12. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title.
13. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to
Section 21A.36.030 of this title.
14. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales.
15. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.350 of this title, the city may not prohibit
construction of a homeless resource center or homeless shelter if the site is approved by and receives funding
through the State Homeless Coordinating Committee, with the concurrence of the Housing and Community
Development Division within the Department of Workforce Services, in accordance with Section 35A-8-604 of
the Utah Code.
38
16. Limited to basement/below ground levels only. Not allowed on the ground or upper levels of the building, with
the exception of associated public leasing/office space.
17. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules.
18. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1.
21A.33.060: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE GATEWAY DISTRICT:
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE GATEWAY DISTRICT in PDF, click HERE.
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
Use G-MU
Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this
title
P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment (indoor) P2
Bar establishment (outdoor) P2,5
Brewpub (indoor) P2
Brewpub (outdoor) P2,5
Tavern (indoor) P2
Tavern (outdoor) P2,5
Ambulance service (indoor) C
Amphitheater, formal P
Amphitheater, informal P
Animal, veterinary office P
Antenna, communication tower P
Antenna, communication towers, exceeding the maximum building height C
Art gallery P
Artisan food production P9
Artists’ loft/studio P
Auction (indoor) P
Auditorium P
Bed and breakfast P
Bed and breakfast inn P
Bed and breakfast manor P
Bio-medical facility P8,9
39
Botanical garden P
Bus line station/terminal P3
Clinic (medical, dental) P
Commercial food preparation P9
Community garden P
Crematorium P
Daycare center, adult P
Daycare center, child P
Daycare, nonregistered home daycare P 6
Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P 6
Dwelling:
Assisted living facility (large) P
Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P
Assisted living facility (small) P
Congregate care facility (large) C
Congregate care facility (small) P
Group home (large) C
Group home (small) when located above or below first story office, retail or
commercial use, or on the first story where the unit is not located adjacent to the street
frontage
P
Living quarters for caretaker or security guard P
Multi-family P
Residential support (large) C
Residential support (small) C
Single-family (attached) P
Equipment rental (indoor and/outdoor) P
Farmers’ market P
Financial institution P
Flea market (indoor) P
Funeral home P
Government facility C
Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P3
Heliport, accessory C
Home occupation P 7
Hotel/motel P
Industrial assembly C9
40
Laboratory, medical related P9
Large wind energy system P
Library P
Mixed use development P
Mobile food business (operation in the public right-of-way) P
Mobile food business (operation on private property) P
Mobile food court P
Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P
Museum P
Office P
Open space P
Park P
Parking:
Commercial C
Off site P
Park and ride lot C
Park and ride lot shared with existing use P
Performing arts production facility P
Photo finishing lab P9
Place of worship P
Radio, television station C
Reception center P
Recreation (indoor) P
Recreation (outdoor) C
Research and development facility P9
Restaurant P
Retail goods establishment P
Retail goods establishment, plant and garden shop, with outdoor retail sales area P
Retail service establishment P
Retail service establishment, upholstery shop C
School:
College and university P
K - 12 private P
K - 12 public P
Music conservatory P
41
Professional and vocational P
Seminary and religious institute P
Seasonal farm stand P
Small brewery C9
Social service mission and charity dining hall C
Solar array P9
Stadium C
Storage, self P3
Store:
Department P
Mass merchandising P
Specialty P
Superstore and hypermarket P
Studio, art P
Studio, motion picture C
Technology facility P9
Theater, live performance P4
Theater, movie P
Urban farm P
Utility, building or structure P1
Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole C
Vehicle:
Automobile repair (minor) P
Automobile sales/rental and service (indoor) P
Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) P
Vending cart, private property P
Vending cart, public property P
Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of
this title)
Zoological park C
Qualifying provisions:
1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title.
2. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.300, ”Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this
title.
3. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Chapter 21A.59, “Design Review”, of this title.
42
4. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district.
5. Subject to the requirements set forth in Section 21A.40.065, “Outdoor Dining”, of this title.
6. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title.
7. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to
Section 21A.36.030 of this title.
8. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules.
9. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1.
No conditional use permit shall be granted for any property which abuts a residential zoning district, except for places
of worship, public/private utilities and related facilities, residential facilities for persons with a disability and
educational facilities.
43
21A.33.070: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS:
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS in PDF, click HERE
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District
RP BP FP AG AG-2 AG-5 AG-20 OS NOS A PL PL-2 I UI MH EI MU
Accessory use, except those that are otherwise
specifically regulated elsewhere in this title
P P P P P P P P 20 P P P P P P P P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark site C2 C2 C2 P2
Agricultural use C P P P P P P
Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility P P
Airport P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment (2,500 square feet or less in floor
area)
C12
Brewpub (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) P12 C12
Brewpub (more than 2,500 square feet in floor area) P12
Tavern (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) C12
Ambulance service (indoor) P P
Ambulance service (outdoor) P10 P10
Amphitheater, formal P C
Amphitheater, informal P P
44
Animal:
Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger C P8 P8 P8 P8
Pet cemetery P4 P4 P4 P4 P4,5
Stable (private) P P P P
Stable (public) P P P P
Veterinary office P P
Antenna, communication tower P P C P P P P P 21 P P C P P P
Antenna, communication tower exceeding the maximum
building height in the zone
C C P 21 P P11 C C C
Art gallery P P P P P P
Artisan food production P24 P18,
24
Bed and breakfast P2 P P
Bed and breakfast inn P2 P P
Bed and breakfast manor P2 P P
Bio-medical facility P23,24 P23,24 P23,
24
P23,
24
Botanical garden P P P P
Cannabis production establishment P P P P P
Cemetery P
Clinic (medical, dental) P P P P P
45
Commercial food preparation P24 P24
Community garden P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Convent/monastery P P
Data center P24
Daycare center, adult P P P P P P P P
Daycare center, child P P P P P P P P P
Daycare, nonregistered home daycare P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16
Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16
Dwelling:
Accessory unit P P P P P P
Assisted living facility (large) C P P
Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P P P
Assisted living facility (small) P P P
Congregate care facility (large) C C C
Congregate care facility (small) P P P
Group home (large) C
Group home (small) P P P P
Living quarters for caretaker or security guard P P P C P P P P
Manufactured home P P P
46
Mobile home P
Multi-family P P
Residential support (large) C
Residential support (small) P
Rooming (boarding) house P
Single-family (attached) P
Single-family (detached) P P P P
Twin home and two-family P
Exhibition hall C P C P
Extractive industry P24
Fairground C
Farm stand, seasonal P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Financial institution P P P
Financial institution with drive-through facility P14 P14
Gas station P7
Golf course P24 P24 P24
Government facility C C P P P P P 20 P C C C13 C P C
Government facility requiring special design features for
security purposes
C C
Government office P P P P P P P P
47
Heliport C C P P C C
Home occupation P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17
Hospital, including accessory lodging facility C P P
Hotel/motel C C P P
Hunting club, duck P
Industrial assembly P24 P24
Jail C
Jewelry fabrication P
Laboratory, medical related P24 P24 P24 P24 P24
Large wind energy system C C C C C C C P P
Library P P P P P
Light manufacturing C24 P24
Manufacturing, concrete or asphalt P15,
24
Meeting hall of membership organization P P P P P
Mixed use development P
Mobile food business (operation on private property) P P P P P
Municipal service uses, including city utility uses and
police and fire stations
C C P P P P P C C C14 C P C
Museum C P P P P P P
48
Nursing care facility P P P
Office P P P P P P P P
Open space P P P P P P P P P9 P P P P P P P P
Park P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Parking:
Commercial C
Off site P P P P P C
Off site (to support uses in an OS or NOS zoning
district)
P
Park and ride lot P C
Park and ride lot shared with existing use P P P P P P P P
Performing arts production facility P P
Philanthropic use P P P P
Place of worship P P P P P
Radio, television station P6 P
Reception center C22 C P P P P
Recreation (indoor) C P P P P P P
Recreation (outdoor) P P P P
Research and development facility P24 P24 P24 P24 P24
Restaurant P7 P
49
Restaurant with drive-through facility P7,14 P3
Retail goods establishment P7 P P
Retail, sales and service accessory use when located
within a principal building
P20 P
Retail, sales and service accessory use when located
within a principal building and operated primarily for
the convenience of employees
P P P P P P P P P
Retail service establishment P
School:
College or university P P P
K - 12 private P P P P
K - 12 public P P P P
Music conservatory P P P
Professional and vocational P P P P P
Seminary and religious institute P P C
Small brewery C24
Solar array P24 P24 P19,
24
P24 P24 P24
Stadium C C C
Storage, accessory (outdoor) P P P P
Studio, art P
50
Technology facility P24 P24 P24 P24
Theater, live performance C15 C15 C15 C15 C15 C15 C15
Theater, movie C C
Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking P
Urban farm P P P P P P P P P P P P
Utility, building or structure P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
Vehicle, automobile rental agency P P
Vending cart, private property P P
Vending cart, public property P
Warehouse P24 P24
Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business
(maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate)
P
Wholesale distribution P24 P24
Wireless telecommunications facility (see
Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title)
Zoological park P
Qualifying provisions:
1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title.
2. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources.
51
3. When located on an arterial street.
4. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval.
5. In conjunction with, and within the boundaries of, a cemetery for human remains.
6. Radio station equipment and antennas shall be required to go through the site plan review process to ensure that the color, design and location of all
proposed equipment and antennas are screened or integrated into the architecture of the project and are compatible with surrounding uses.
7. When approved as part of a business park planned development pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 21A.55 of this title.
8. Kennels, whether within penned enclosures or within enclosed buildings, shall not be permitted within 200 feet of an existing single-family dwelling on an
adjacent lot.
9. Trails and trailheads with signage are subject to Section 21A.46.120, “Sign Regulations for Special Purpose Districts”, of this title.
10. Greater than 3 ambulances at location require a conditional use.
11. Maximum of 1 monopole per property and only when it is government owned and operated for public safety purposes.
12. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title.
13. If located on a collector or arterial street according to the Salt Lake City Transportation Master Plan - Major Street Plan: Roadway Functional
Classification map.
14. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive-through use regulations.
15. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district.
16. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title.
17. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title.
18. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales.
19. Prior to issuance of a building permit in the Development Area and the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area of the Northwest Quadrant Overlay, consultation with
the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources is required to obtain recommendations on siting and equipment types for all solar arrays on a particular property
to mitigate impacts to wildlife.
20. When customarily provided with the principal use and is accessory to the principal use.
21. New antennae and communication towers are allowed outside the telecommunication corridor in the OS Open Space District for public safety, public
security or Salt Lake City Public Utilities Department purposes only.
52
22. Reception centers may be allowed in parks of 100 acres or more where the reception center is a subordinate use to the principal use of the property as a
park. Reception centers are allowed in existing buildings, are limited to 1 reception center per park, and hours of operation are limited to park hours.
Removal of existing recreation areas to accommodate the stand alone reception center use, including areas to accommodate parking for the reception
center use, is not permitted.
23. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental
Quality administrative rules.
24. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1.
53
21A.33.080: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN FORM BASED DISTRICTS:
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN FORM BASED DISTRICTS in PDF, click HERE
Note: Uses which are not listed in the following table are not permitted in any Form Based Code Zoning District.
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District
FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-SC FB-SE
Accessory use, except those that are specifically regulated
in this chapter, or elsewhere in this title
P P P P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment P P C
Brewpub P P C
Tavern, 2,500 square feet or less in floor area P P C
Animal, veterinary office P P P
Antenna, communication tower P P P
Art gallery P P P
Artisan food production P3,5 P3,5 P3,5
Bed and breakfast P P P P
Bed and breakfast inn P P P P
Bed and breakfast manor P P P P
Bio-medical facility P4,5 P4,5
Clinic (medical, dental) P P P
Commercial food preparation P5 P5 P5
Community garden P P P P
Community recreation center P P P
Daycare center, adult P P P
Daycare center, child P P P
Daycare, nonregistered home daycare P1 P1 P1 P1
Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P1 P1 P1 P1
Dwelling:
Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P P P P
Assisted living facility (small) P P P
Congregate care facility (large) C C C
Congregate care facility (small) C
Group home (large) P P P
54
Group home (small) when located above or below first
story office, retail, or commercial use, or on the first
story where the unit is not located adjacent to street
frontage
P P P
Multi-family P P P
Residential support (large) P
Residential support (small) P
Rooming (boarding) house P
Single-family attached P P P
Single-family detached P
Single-family detached (cottage development building
form only)
P P
Single room occupancy P
Two-family P
Farmers’ market P P P
Financial institution P P P
Funeral home P P P
Government facility P P P P
Health and fitness facility P P P
Home occupation P2 P2 P2 P2
Hotel/motel P P
House museum in landmark site P P P P
Laboratory, medical related P5 P5 P5
Library P P P
Mixed use developments including residential and other
uses allowed in the zoning district
P P P
Municipal service uses, including city utility uses and
police and fire stations
P P P P
Museum P P P
Nursing care facility P P P
Office P P P
Office and/or reception center in landmark site P P P
Open space P P P P
Park P P P P
Parking, off site P P P P
Photo finishing lab P5 P5
Place of worship P P P
55
Plazas P P P P
Recreation (indoor) P P P
Research and development facility P5 P5 P5
Restaurant P P P
Retail goods establishment P P P
Retail goods establishment, plant and garden shop with
outdoor retail sales area
P P P
Retail service establishment P P P
Sales and display (outdoor) P P P
School:
College or university P P P
Music conservatory P P P
Professional and vocational P P P
Seminary and religious institute P P P
Seasonal farm stand P P P
Solar array P5 P5 P5
Store, specialty P P P
Studio, art P P P
Technology facility P5 P5 P5
Theater, movie P P P
Urban farm P P P P
Utility, building or structure P P P P
Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe, or pole P P P P
Vending cart, private property P P P
Wireless telecommunications facility P P P
Qualifying provisions:
1. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title.
2. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title.
3. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales.
4. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules.
5. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1.
56
SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.60.020. That Section
21A.60.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (List of Defined Terms) shall be and hereby is amended as follows:
a. Adding the Term “Anticipated Daily Water Use Report”. That Section 21A.60.040
shall be and hereby is amended to add the term “Anticipated Daily Water Use Report”, which term shall
be inserted into Section 21A.60.020 in alphabetical order and shall read as follows:
Anticipated Daily Water Use Report.
b. Adding the Term “Potable water”. That Section 21A.60.040 shall be and hereby is
amended to add the term “Potable water”, which term shall be inserted into Section 21A.60.020 in
alphabetical order and shall read as follows:
Potable water.
SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section
21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Definitions of Terms) shall be and hereby is amended as follows:
a. Amending the Definition of “BOTTLING PLANT”. That the definition of the term,
“BOTTLING PLANT” provided in Section 21A.62.040 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows:
BOTTLING PLANT: An establishment that engages in the bottling, canning, or filling of any
container with beverages for distribution. The term “bottling plant” shall not include any beverage or
food manufacturing type use which is otherwise listed specifically in the table of permitted and
conditional uses found in Chapter 21A.33 of this title.
b. Adding the Definition “ANTICIPATED DAILY WATER USE REPORT”. That
Section 21A.62.040 shall be and hereby is amended to add the definition “ANTICIPATED DAILY
WATER USE REPORT”, which definition shall be inserted into Section 21A.62.040 in alphabetical
order and shall read as follows:
57
ANTICIPATED DAILY WATER USE REPORT: A detailed report provided by an applicant that
demonstrates the anticipated daily use and/or consumption of water for the described use based on
commonly accepted standards within the water utility industry.
c. Adding the Definition “POTABLE WATER”. That Section 21A.62.040 shall be and
hereby is amended to add the definition “POTABLE WATER”, which definition shall be inserted into
Section 21A.62.040 in alphabetical order and shall read as follows:
POTABLE WATER: Water that is safe for human consumption and provided by the Salt Lake City
Department of Public Utilities.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance take effect immediately after it has been published in
accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-713.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
58
Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2021.
Published: ______________.
Ordinance regulating high water uses (final)
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney
October 29, 2021
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 1
No. _____ of 2021 2
(An ordinance amending various sections of the Salt Lake City Code 3
pertaining to land uses that use or consume significant amounts of water 4
pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00635) 5
6
An ordinance amending various sections of the Salt Lake City Code to regulate land uses 7
that use or consume significant amounts of water as provided herein. 8
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held 9
a public hearing on September 22, 2021 to consider a request by the Salt Lake City Council (the 10
“City Council”) to amend the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit land uses that use or consume a 11
significant amount of water; and 12
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held 13
a public hearing on September 22, 2021 to consider petition number PLNPCM2021-00635 (the 14
“petition”) initiated by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin Mendenhall, to amend Salt Lake City Code to 15
prohibit land uses that use or consume a significant amount of water; and 16
WHEREAS, at its September 22, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission voted in favor 17
of forwarding a positive recommendation of approval to the City Council to adopt changes to the 18
Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the prohibition of land uses which use or consume significant 19
amounts of water; and 20
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to modify its land use regulations to as 21
provided herein; and 22
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that while the city has adequate water 23
resources for the current needs of the city’s customers in the city’s designated water service area 24
2
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
and the city holds water interests that can be developed in the future for the benefit of its water 25
customers, the city’s water resource supply is not unlimited and, furthermore changing 26
environmental conditions are placing significant pressure on the city’s water resources; 27
WHEREAS, the majority of the city’s water resources emanate from the watershed that 28
contribute water to Great Salt Lake, and the city is very concerned that a shrinking Great Salt 29
Lake has significant negative ramifications to the health and welfare of the public and 30
environment; and 31
WHEREAS, immediate steps are appropriate to limit use of the city’s water resources by 32
water consumers that would consume very large quantities of water that would exacerbate the 33
pressures on the city’s water resources and the Great Salt Lake system ; and 34
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to enact land use regulations that protect 35
and preserve the availability of the city to provide water to its current customers and to future 36
development in the city that will promote the public health, safety and general welfare of the 37
present and future city residents; and 38
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that modification of its land use regulations 39
is just one of a number of methods in which Salt Lake City currently regulates water use or 40
consumption and contemplates that the city will continue to explore further regulatory methods 41
to help ensure a fair and equitable use of the city’s finite resource; and 42
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds, after holding a public hearing on this 43
matter, that adopting this ordinance promotes the health, safety, and public welfare of the 44
citizens of the city. 45
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 46
3
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.33. That Chapter 47
21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be and hereby is amended to read and 48
appear as follows: 49
SECTION: 50
21A.33.010: General Provisions 51
21A.33.020: Table Oof Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Ffor Residential Districts 52
21A.33.030: Table Oof Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Ffor Commercial Districts 53
21A.33.035: Table Oof Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Ffor Transit Station Area 54
Districts 55
21A.33.040: Table Oof Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Ffor Manufacturing Districts 56
21A.33.050: Table Oof Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Ffor Downtown Districts 57
21A.33.060: Table Oof Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Iin Tthe Gateway District 58
21A.33.070: Table Oof Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Ffor Special Purpose Districts 59
21A.33.080: Table Oof Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Iin Form Based Districts 60
61
21A.33.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS: 62
63
A. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sSections 21A.33.020, 64
21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 65
21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted 66
provided that they comply with the general standards set forth in pPart IV of this title and 67
all other applicable requirements of this title. 68
B. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sSections 21A.33.020, 69
21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 70
21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed 71
provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses 72
set forth in cChapter 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable 73
requirements of this title. 74
C. Uses Not Permitted: Any use specifically listed without a "P" or a "C" designated in the 75
table of permitted and conditional uses for a district shall not be allowed in that zoning 76
district. 77
D. Prohibited Uses: The following land uses are prohibited in all zoning districts: 78
1. Commercial and Industrial Land Uses That Exceed 300,000 Gallons of Water per Day. 79
4
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
a. New Land Uses: Any new commercial or industrial land use that consumes or uses 80
more than an annual average of 300,000 gallons of potable water per day is prohibited 81
in all zoning districts. The use and consumption limit is based on the total use from all 82
water meters that serve the land use. 83
b. Expansions of Existing Uses: No commercial or industrial land use shall expand to an 84
extent that increases its daily potable water consumption or use to exceed an annual 85
average of 300,000 gallons of potable water per day. Notwithstanding the provisions 86
of Subsection 21A.38.040.H, an existing land use that exceeds the water use threshold 87
may not expand if the expansion will result in a net increase in water consumption or 88
use. The use and consumption limit is based on the total use from all water meters that 89
serve the land use. 90
c. Water Use Report Required: A land use applicant shall certify the anticipated daily 91
water use of the proposed land use in a manner satisfactory to the Department of 92
Public Utilities. The Department of Public Utilities may require an anticipated daily 93
water use report of any land use applicant proposing a new use or expansion of an 94
existing use. 95
d. Exemption: Agricultural, residential, and institutional land uses are not subject to the 96
regulations of this subsection. For purposes of this section, an institutional land use 97
includes government owned or operated facilities, places of worship, and hospitals. 98
2. Reserved. 99
100
101
102
5
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
21A.33.020: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS: 103
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS in PDF, click HERE 104
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
105
Use Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Bby District
FR-1/
43,560
FR-2/
21,780
FR-3/
12,000
R-1/
12,000
R-1/
7,000
R-1/
5,000
SR-1 SR-2 SR-3 R-2 RMF-
30
MF-35 RMF-
45
RMF-
75
RB R-MU-
35
R-MU-
45
R-MU RO
Accessory use, except those
that are otherwise
specifically regulated
elsewhere in this title
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Adaptive reuse of a
landmark site
C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 P P P P P6
Alcohol, bar establishment
(2,500 square feet or less in
floor area)
C9 C9 C9 C9
Alcohol, brewpub (2,500
square feet or less in floor
area)
C9 C9 C9
Alcohol, tavern (2,500
square feet or less in floor
area)
C9
Animal, veterinary office C C C P P6
Art gallery P P P P P
Artisan food production
(2,500 square feet or less in
floor area)
P3 P3 P3 P3 P
6
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Bed and breakfast inn P P P P
Bed and breakfast manor P
Clinic (medical, dental) P P P P P6
Commercial food
preparation
P21 P21 P21 P21 P21
Community garden C C C C C C C C C P P P P P P P P P
Community recreation
center
C
Crematorium C C C
Daycare center, adult C P P P P P P
Daycare center, child C18 C1 8 C1 8 C18 C1 8 C1 8 C18 C18 C18 P P P P P P
Daycare, nonregistered
home daycare
P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18
Daycare, registered home
daycare or preschool
P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18
Dwelling, accessory guest
and servant’s quarter
P11 P11 P11
Dwelling, accessory unit C C C C C C P P P P P P P P P P P P
Dwelling, assisted living
facility (large)
C P P C P P
Dwelling, assisted living
facility (limited capacity)
C C C C C C C C C P P P P P P P P
7
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Dwelling, assisted living
facility (small)
P P P P P P
Dwelling, congregate care
facility (large)
C C C C C C C
Dwelling, congregate care
facility (small)
C C C C C C C C C C P P P P P P P P
Dwelling; dormitory,
fraternity, sorority
P12
Dwelling, group home
(large)
C C C C C1 4 C C C C1 4
Dwelling, group home
(small)
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P15 P P P P15
Dwelling, manufactured
home
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Dwelling, multi- family P P P P P P P P P
Dwelling, residential
support (large)
C C C C C1 6
Dwelling, residential
support (small)
C C P C C P P17
Dwelling, rooming
(boarding) house
C P C C C P P
Dwelling, single- family
(attached)
P P P P P P P P P P
Dwelling, single- family
(detached)
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
8
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Dwelling, twin home and
two- family
P P P2 P P P P P P P
Financial institution P P P P6
Funeral home P P P P
Governmental facility C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C6
Home occupation P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20 P20
Laboratory, medical related P21 P21 P21 P21 P21
Library C C C C C
Mixed use development P1 P P P P
Mobile food business
(operation on private
property)
P P P
Municipal service use,
including Ccity utility use
and police and fire station
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
Museum P C P P P
Nursing care facility P P P P P
Office, excluding medical
and dental clinic and office
P P P P P6
Open space on lots less than
4 acres in size
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Park P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Parking, off site (to support
nonconforming uses in a
C C C C C
9
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
residential zone or uses in
the CN or CB Zzones)
Parking, park and ride lot
shared with existing use
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Place of worship on lots less
than 4 acres in size
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
Reception center P P P
Recreation (indoor) P P P P P
Research and development
facility
P21 P21
Restaurant P P P P P
Restaurant with drive-
through facility
Retail goods establishment P P P P
Retail goods establishment,
plant and garden shop with
outdoor retail sales area
P P P P
Retail service establishment P P P P
School, music conservatory P C C P
School, professional and
vocational
P C C P P6
School, seminary and
religious institute
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
Seasonal farm stand P P P P P
10
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Studio, art P P P P P
Technology facility P21 P21 P21 P21
Temporary use of closed
schools and churches
C19 C19 C19 C19 C1 9 C1 9 C19 C1 9 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19
Theater, live performance C1 3 C13 C13 C13 C1 3
Theater, movie C C C C C
Urban farm P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Utility, building or structure P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5, 7
Utility, transmission wire,
line, pipe or pole
P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5
Wireless
telecommunications facility
(see sSection 21A.40.090,
tTable 21A.40.090.E of this
title)
Qualifying provisions: 106
1. A single apartment unit may be located above first floor retail/office. 107
2. Provided that no more than 2 two-family buildings are located adjacent to one another and no more than 3 such dwellings are located along the same block face (within 108
subdivisions approved after April 12, 1995). 109
3. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 110
4. Reserved. 111
5. See sSubsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. 112
6. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building’s footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of 113
the building’s footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review. 114
7. Subject to conformance to the provisions in sSection 21A.02.050 of this title. 115
11
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of sSubsection 21A.24.010.S of this title. 116
9. Subject to conformance with the provisions in sSection 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 117
10. In the RB Zzoning Ddistrict, the total square footage, including patio space, shall not exceed 2,200 square feet in total. Total square footage will include a maximum 1,750 118
square feet of floor space within a business and a maximum of 450 square feet in an outdoor patio area. 119
11. Accessory guest or servant’s quarters must be located within the buildable area on the lot. 120
12. Subject to conformance with the provisions of sSection 21A.36.150 of this title. 121
13. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Ssingle- or Ttwo-Ffamily Zzoning Ddistrict. 122
14. Large group homes established in the RB and RO Ddistricts shall be located above the ground floor. 123
15. Small group homes established in the RB and RO Ddistricts shall be located above the ground floor. 124
16. Large residential support established in RO Ddistricts shall be located above the ground floor. 125
17. Small residential support established in RO Ddistricts shall be located above the ground floor. 126
18. Subject to sSection 21A.36.130 of this title. 127
19. Subject to sSection 21A.36.170 of this title. 128
20. Subject to sSection 21A.36.030 of this title. 129
21. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 130
12
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR COMMERCIAL 131
DISTRICTS: 132
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS in PDF, click HERE 133
134
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
135
Use Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Bby District
CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB
Accessory use, except those that are specifically regulated
elsewhere in this title
P P P P P P P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P P P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment (2,500 square feet or less in floor
area)
C10,11 C10,11 P10 P10 P10 P10
Bar establishment (more than 2,500 square feet in floor
area)
P10 C10 P10 P10
Brewpub (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) C10,11 P10 P10 P10 P10
Brewpub (more than 2,500 square feet in floor area) P10 C10 P10 P10
Distillery P16, 23
Tavern (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) C10,11 P10 P10 P10 P10
Tavern (more than 2,500 square feet in floor area) P10 C10 P10 P10
Ambulance service (indoor) P P P P
Ambulance service (outdoor) P6 P6 P6 P
Amusement park P P
Animal:
Cremation service
P P
Kennel P
Pet cemetery P4
Veterinary office C P P P P P
Antenna, communication tower P P P P P
13
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum
building height in the zone
C C C C C
Art gallery P P P P P P P
Artisan food production (2,500 square feet or less in floor
area)
P20 P20 P P P20 P
Artisan food production (more than 2,500 square feet in
floor area)
P23 P23 P23
Auction (outdoor) P P
Auditorium P P P P
Bakery, commercial P23
Bed and breakfast P P P P P P P14
Bed and breakfast inn P P P P P P
Bed and breakfast manor C3 C3 P P P
Bio-medical facility P22, 23 P22, 23 P22, 23 P22, 23
Blacksmith shop P23
Blood donation center C P
Brewery P23
Bus line station/terminal P P
Bus line yard and repair facility P
Car wash P P P
Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience
store that sells gas
P P P P
Check cashing/payday loan business P8 P8
Clinic (medical, dental) P P P P P P
Commercial food preparation P23 P23 P23 P23 P23 P23
Community correctional facility, large
Community correctional facility, small C7,17
Community garden P P P P P P P
Contractor’s yard/office C P
14
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Crematorium C C C C
Daycare center, adult P P P P P P
Daycare center, child P P P P P P
Daycare, nonregistered home daycare or preschool P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18
Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18 P18
Dwelling:
Assisted living facility (large) P P P P
Assisted living facility (small) P P P P
Congregate care facility (large) C C C C
Congregate care facility (small) P
Group home (large) P C C
Group home (small) when located above or below first
story office, retail, or commercial use, or on the first
story where the unit is not located adjacent to street
frontage
P P P P P P P
Living quarter for caretaker or security guard P P P P P P
Manufactured home P
Multi-family P P P P P P
Residential support (large) C C
Residential support (small) C C
Rooming (boarding) house P P P P P
Single-family attached P
Single-family detached P
Single room occupancy
Twin home P
Two-family P
Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) P P
Farmers’ market C C P P
15
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Financial institution P P P P P P
Financial institution with drive-through facility P9 P9 P9 P9 P9
Flea market (indoor) P P P P
Flea market (outdoor) P
Funeral home P P P P
Gas station C P P P P
Government facility C C C C C C
Government facility requiring special design features for
security purposes
P P P P P P
Home occupation P19 P19 P19 P19 P19 P19 P19
Homeless resource center C21
Homeless shelter C21
Hotel/motel C P P P
House museum in landmark sites (see
sSubsection 21A.24.010.S of this title)
C
Impound lot C12
Industrial assembly P23
Intermodal transit passenger hub P
Laboratory, medical related P23 P23 P23 P23 P23
Large wind energy system P P P
Laundry, commercial P23
Library P P P P P P C
Limousine service (large) P
Limousine service (small) C C P
Manufactured/mobile home sales and service P
Mixed use development P P P P P P P13
Mobile food business (operation on private property) P P P P P P
16
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Municipal service uses, including Ccity utility uses and
police and fire stations
C C C C C C
Museum P P P P P P P
Nursing care facility P P P
Office P P P P P P P15
Office, single practitioner medical, dental, and health P
Offices and reception centers in landmark sites (see
sSubsection 21A.24.010.S of this title)
C
Open space P P P P P P
Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P
Park P P P P P P P
Parking:
Commercial C P P
Off site C P P P P P
Park and ride lot C C P P
Park and ride lot shared with existing use P P P P P
Place of worship on lot less than 4 acres in size P P P P P P C
Radio, television station P P P P
Reception center P P P P P
Recreation (indoor) P P P P P P P
Recreation (outdoor) C C P
Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre) C
Recycling collection station P P P P P P
Research and development facility P23 P23 P23 P23
Restaurant P P P P P P
Restaurant with drive-through facility P9 P9 P9 P9 P9
Retail goods establishment P P P P P P P
Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area P P P P P P P
17
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
With drive-through facility P9 P9 P9 P9 P9
Retail service establishment P P P P P P P
Furniture repair shop C P P P P P
With drive-through facility P9 P9 P9 P9 P9
Reverse vending machine P P P P P P
Sales and display (outdoor) P P P P P P
School:
College or university P P P P P
Music conservatory P P P P P
Professional and vocational P P P P P
Seminary and religious institute P P P P P C
Seasonal farm stand P P P P P P
Sexually oriented business P5
Sign painting/fabrication P
Small brewery C23 P23
Solar array P23
Storage (outdoor) C P
Storage, public (outdoor) C P
Storage, self P P
Store:
Department P P
Mass merchandising P P P
Pawnshop P
Specialty P P P P
Superstore and hypermarket P P
Warehouse club P
Studio, art P P P P P P P
18
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Studio, motion picture P
Taxicab facility P
Technology facility P23 P23 P23 P23
Theater, live performance P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Theater, movie C P P P P
Urban farm P P P P P P
Utility, building or structure P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2
Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe, or pole P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2
Vehicle:
Auction P
Automobile repair (major) P P
Automobile repair (minor) C P P P P P
Automobile sales/rental and service P P
Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) P23
Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service P P
Truck repair (large) P
Truck sales and rental (large) P P
Vending cart, private property P
Warehouse P23 P23
Welding shop P
Wholesale distribution P23 P23
Wireless telecommunications facility (see
sSection 21A.40.090, tTable 21A.40.090.E of this title)
C
Woodworking mill P23
136
Qualifying provisions: 137
1. Development in the CS Ddistrict shall be subject to planned development approval pursuant to the provisions 138
of cChapter 21A.55 of this title. Certain developments in the CSHBD Zzone shall be subject to the design review 139
process pursuant to the provisions of sSubsection 21A.26.060.D and cChapter 21A.59 of this title. 140
19
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
2. Subject to conformance to the provisions in sSubsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. 141
3. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City rRegister of cCultural rResources (see 142
sSubsections 21A.264.010.S and 21A.26.010.K of this title). 143
4. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval. 144
5. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in sSection 21A.36.140 of this title. 145
6. Greater than 3 ambulances at location require a conditional use. 146
7. A community correctional facility is considered an institutional use and any such facility located within an the 147
AFPP Airport Noise Flight Path Protection Overlay Zone District is subject to the land use and sound attenuation 148
standards for institutional uses of the applicable Airport Overlay influence Zzone within chapter Section 149
21A.34.040 of this title. 150
8. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than 1/2 mile of other check cashing/payday loan 151
businesses. 152
9. Subject to conformance to the provisions in sSection 21A.40.060 of this title for drive-through use regulations. 153
10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in sSection 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this 154
title. 155
11. In CN and CB Zzoning Ddistricts, the total square footage, including patio space, shall not exceed 2,200 square 156
feet in total. Total square footage will include a maximum 1,750 square feet of floor space within a business and a 157
maximum of 450 square feet in an outdoor patio area. 158
12. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Ssingle- or Ttwo-Ffamily Zzoning Ddistrict. 159
13. Residential units may be located above or below first floor retail/office. 160
14. In the SNB Zzoning Ddistrict, bed and breakfast use is only allowed in a landmark site. 161
15. Medical and dental offices are not allowed in the SNB Zzoning Ddistrict, except for single practitioner medical, 162
dental and health offices. 163
16. Permitted in the CG Zzoning Ddistrict only when associated with an on site food service establishment. 164
17. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of any Rresidential Zzoning Ddistrict boundary and subject to sSection 21A.36.110 of 165
this title. 166
18. Subject to sSection 21A.36.130 of this title. 167
19. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to 168
sSection 21A.36.030 of this title. 169
20. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 170
21. Subject to conformance with the provisions of sSection 21A.36.350 of this title, the Ccity may not prohibit 171
construction of a homeless resource center or homeless shelter if the site is approved by and receives funding 172
through the State Homeless Coordinating Committee, with the concurrence of the Housing and Community 173
Development Division within the Department of Workforce Services, in accordance with sSection 35A-8-604 of 174
the Utah Code. 175
22. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by 176
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 177
20
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
23. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 178
179
180
21A.33.035: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR TRANSIT STATION AREA 181
DISTRICTS: 182
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR TRANSIT STATION AREA DISTRICTS in PDF, 183
click HERE 184
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted 185
186
Use Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Bby District
TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP
Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition
Accessory use, except those
that are specifically regulated
elsewhere in this title
P P P P P P P P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark
site
P P P P P P P P
Agricultural use P P P P P P P P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment (2,500
square feet or less in floor
area)
P P P P P P P P
Bar establishment (more
than 2,500 square feet in
floor area)
P C P C P C P C
Brewpub (2,500 square feet
or less in floor area)
P P P P P P P P
Brewpub (more than 2,500
square feet in floor area)
P C P C P C P C
Distillery P12 C12 P12 C12 P12 P12 P12 C12
Tavern (2,500 square feet
or less in floor area)
P P P P P P P P
Tavern (more than 2,500
square feet in floor area)
P C P C P C P C
Winery P12 C12 P12 C12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Amphitheater, formal C C
21
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Amphitheater, informal C C
Amusement park C C
Animal:
Cremation service P P P P P P P P
Kennel P P P P
Pet cemetery1 P1 P1 P1 P1
Stable, public P P
Veterinary office P P P P P P P P
Antenna, communication
tower
P P P P P P P P
Antenna, communication
tower, exceeding the
maximum building height in
the zone
C C C C C C C C
Art gallery P P P P P P P P
Artisan food production P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Auction (indoor) P P P P
Auditorium P P
Bakery, commercial P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Bed and breakfast P P P P P P P P
Bed and breakfast inn P P P P P P P P
Bed and breakfast manor P P P P P P P P
Bio-medical facility P11,12 P11,12 P11,12 P11,12
Blood donation center P P P P P P P P
Botanical garden P P P P P P P P
Brewery C12 C12 C12 C12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Car wash P P
Car wash as accessory use to
gas station or convenience
store that sells gas
P P
22
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Clinic (medical, dental) P P P P P P P P
Commercial food preparation P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Community correctional
facility, small2,8
C2,8
Community garden P P P P P P P P
Convent/monastery P P P P P P P P
Convention center C C
Crematorium P P P P P P
Daycare center, adult P P P P P P P P
Daycare center, child P P P P P P P P
Daycare, nonregistered home
daycare or preschool
P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6
Daycare, registered home
daycare or preschool
P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6
Dwelling:
Artists’ loft/studio P P P P P P P P
Assisted living facility
(large)
P P P P P P P P
Assisted living facility
(small)
P P P P P P P P
Congregate care facility
(large)
C C C C C C C C
Congregate care facility
(small)
P P P P P P P P
Group home (large) P P P P P P P P
Group home (small) P P P P P P P P
Living quarter for caretaker
or security guard
P P P P P P P P
Manufactured home P P P P P P P P
Multi-family P P P P P P P P
Residential support (large) P P P P P P P P
23
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Residential support (small) P P P P P P P P
Rooming (boarding) house P P P P P P P P
Single-family attached P P P P P P P P
Single-family detached P P P P
Single room occupancy P P P P P P P P
Twin home P P P P P P P P
Two-family P P P P P P P P
Exhibition hall C C
Farmers’ market P P P P P P P P
Financial institution P P P P P P P P
Financial institution with
drive-through facility
P P
Flea market (indoor) P P P P P P P P
Flea market (outdoor) P P
Food processing P12 P12 P12 P12
Funeral home P P P P P P P P
Gas station P P
Government facility P P P P P P P P
Government facility
requiring special design
features for security purposes
P P P P P P P P
Grain elevator P P P P
Greenhouse P P P P P P P P
Home occupation P7 P7 P7 P7 P7 P7 P7 P7
Hospital, including accessory
lodging facility
P P P P P P P P
Hotel/motel P P P P P P P P
House museum in landmark
sites (see
P P P P P P P P
24
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
sSubsection 21A.24.010.S of
this title)
Industrial assembly P12 P12 P12 P12
Laboratory, medical related P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Laundry, commercial P12 P12
Library P P P P P P P P
Light manufacturing P12 P12 P12 P12
Meeting hall of membership
organization
P P P P P P P P
Mixed use development P P P P P P P P
Mobile food business
(operating on private
property)
P P P P P P P P
Mobile food business
(operation in public right- of-
way)
P P P P P P P P
Mobile food court P P P P P P
Municipal service uses,
including Ccity utility uses
and police and fire stations
P P P P P P P P
Museum P P P P P P P P
Nursing care facility P P P P P P P P
Office P P P P P P P P
Office, publishing company P P P P P P P P
Office, single practitioner
medical, dental, and health
P P P P P P P P
Offices and reception centers
in landmark sites (see
sSubsection 21A.24.010.S of
this title)
P P P P P P P P
Open space P P P P P P P P
Park P P P P P P P P
Parking:
25
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Commercial (if located in a
parking structure)
P P P P P P P
Commercial (surface lot)3 P3 P3
Off site3 P3 P3 P3 P3 P3 P3 P7 P3
Park and ride lot3 P3 P3
Park and ride lot shared
with existing use
P P
Performing arts production
facility
P P P P P P P P
Philanthropic use P P P P P P P P
Photo finishing lab P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Place of worship P P P P P P P P
Printing plant P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Radio, television station P P P P P P
Railroad passenger station P P P P P P P P
Reception center P P P P P P P P
Recreation (indoor) P P P P P P P P
Recreation (outdoor) P P P P P P P P
Recycling collection station P P P P P P P P
Research and development
facility
P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Restaurant P P P P P P P P
Restaurant with drive-
through facility9
C10
Retail goods establishment P P P P P P P P
Plant and garden shop with
outdoor retail sales area
P P P P P P P P
With drive-through facility
Retail service establishment P P P P P P P P
Furniture repair shop P P P P P P P P
26
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Sales and display (outdoor) P P P P P P P P
School:
College or university P P P P P P P P
Music conservatory P P P P P P P P
Professional and vocational P P P P P P P P
Seminary and religious
institute
P P P P P P P P
Seasonal farm stand P P P P P P P P
Small brewery P12 C12 P12 C12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Social service mission and
charity dining hall
C C C C P P P P
Solar array P12 P12 P12 P12
Stadium C C C C C C
Storage, self P P P P
Store:
Convenience P P P P P P P P
Department P P P P P P P P
Mass merchandising P P P P P P P P
Specialty P P P P P P P P
Superstore and
hypermarket
P P
Warehouse club P P
Studio, art P P P P P P P P
Studio, motion picture P P P P
Technology facility P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12 P12
Theater, live performance4 P4 C4 P4 C4 P4 P4 P4 P4
Theater, movie P P P P P P
Urban farm P P P P P P P P
27
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Utility, building or structure5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5
Utility, transmission wire,
line, pipe, or pole5
P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5
Vehicle:
Automobile repair (minor) P P
Vending cart, private
property
P P P P P P P P
Warehouse P12 P12
Wholesale distribution P12
Wireless telecommunications
facility (see
sSection 21A.40.090 of this
title)
P P P P P P P P
Wireless telecommunications
facility, exceeding the
maximum building height of
the zone (see
sSection 21A.40.090 of this
title)
C C C C C C C C
Woodworking mill P12 P12 P12
Zoological park C C
187
Qualifying provisions for specific land uses: 188
1. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval. 189
2. A community correctional facility is considered an institutional use and any such facility located within an the 190
AFPP Airport Noise Flight Path Protection Overlay Zone District is subject to the land use and sound attenuation 191
standards for institutional uses of the applicable Airport Overlay influence Zzone within chapter Section 192
21A.34.040 of this title. 193
3. Surface parking lots as a principal use located on a lot that has frontage on a public street are prohibited. 194
4. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Ssingle- or Ttwo-Ffamily Zzoning Ddistrict. 195
5. Subject to conformance to the provisions in sSubsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. 196
6. Subject to sSection 21A.36.130 of this title. 197
7. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to 198
sSection 21A.36.030 of this title. 199
8. Subject to sSection 21A.36.110 of this title. 200
28
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
9. Drive-through windows are prohibited on any public street facing facade and automobile stacking is prohibited 201
between public street facing facades and the adjacent public right-of-way. 202
10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in sSection 21A.40.060 for drive-through use regulations. 203
11. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by 204
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 205
12. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 206
207
21A.33.040: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MANUFACTURING 208
DISTRICTS: 209
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MANUFACTURING DISTRICTS in PDF, 210
click HERE. 211
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
212
Use Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Bby District M-1 M-2
Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this
title
P P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark site C C7
Agricultural use P P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment C6,10 C6,10
Brewpub P6,10 P6,10
Distillery P19 P19
Tavern C6,10 C6,10
Winery P19 P19
Ambulance services (indoor and/or outdoor) P P
Animal:
Cremation service P P
Kennel P13 P
Pet cemetery P2 P2
Pound P12,13 P12
Raising of furbearing animals C P
Stockyard C12 P12
Veterinary office P P
Antenna, communication tower P P
Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C C
29
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Artisan food production P19 P19
Bakery, commercial P19 P19
Bio-medical facility P18,19 P18,19
Blacksmith shop P19 P19
Bottling plant P19,20 P19,20
Brewery P19 P19
Building materials distribution P P
Bus line station/terminal P P
Bus line yard and repair facility P12 P
Cannabis production establishment P P
Check cashing/payday loan business P9
Chemical manufacturing and/or storage C19
Commercial food preparation P19 P19
Community correctional facility, large C8,16
Community correctional facility, small C8,16
Community garden P
Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing C12,13,19 P12,19
Contractor’s yard/office P P
Crematorium P P
Data center P19
Daycare center, adult P
Daycare center, child P
Drop forge industry P19
Dwelling, living quarters for caretaker or security guard, limited to uses on lots 1 acre
in size or larger and is accessory to a principal use allowed by the zoning district
P P
Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) P P
Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) P P
Explosive manufacturing and storage C12,19
Financial institution with or without drive-through facility P11
Flammable liquids or gases, heating fuel distribution and storage P12
Food processing P19 P19
Gas station P P
Golf course P19
Government facility P P
Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P P
Grain elevator C12 P
30
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Greenhouse P
Heavy manufacturing P12,19
Home occupation P15 P15
Hotel/motel P
Impound lot P12 P12
Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste C12,19
Industrial assembly P19 P19
Laboratory, medical related P19 P19
Large wind energy system P13,14 P
Laundry, commercial P19 P19
Light manufacturing P19 P19
Limousine service P P
Mobile food business (operation in the public right- of-way) P P
Mobile food business (operation on private property) P P
Mobile food court P P
Municipal services uses including Ccity utility uses and police and fire stations P
Office P
Office, publishing company P
Open space P P
Package delivery facility P P
Paint manufacturing P19
Park P P
Parking:
Commercial P
Off site P P
Park and ride lot P P
Park and ride lot shared with existing use P P
Photo finishing lab P19 P19
Poultry farm or processing plant P12,19
Printing plant P19
Radio, television station P
Railroad, freight terminal facility C4 C4
Railroad, repair shop C19 P19
Recreation (indoor) P
Recreation (outdoor) P
31
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Recycling:
Collection station P P
Processing center (indoor) P19 P19
Processing center (outdoor) C12,13,14,19 P12,19
Refinery, petroleum products C12,19
Restaurant with or without drive-through facilities P11
Research and development facility P19 P19
Retail goods establishment with or without drive- through facility P11
Retail service establishment:
Electronic repair shop P
Furniture repair shop P P
Upholstery shop P
Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution C P
School:
Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) P
Professional and vocational (without outdoor activities) P
Seminary and religious institute P
Seasonal farm stand P P
Sexually oriented business P5 P5
Sign painting/fabrication P P
Slaughterhouse P12
Small brewery P19 P19
Solar array P17,19 P19
Storage and display (outdoor) P P
Storage, public (outdoor) P P
Storage, self P P
Store, convenience P P
Studio, motion picture P
Taxicab facility P P
Technology facility P19
Tire distribution retail/wholesale P P
Truck freight terminal P12 P12
Urban farm P P
Utility:
Building or structure P P
32
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Electric generation facility C3,12,19 C3,12,19
Sewage treatment plant C P
Solid waste transfer station C12 P12
Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P1 P1
Vehicle:
Auction P P
Automobile and truck repair P P
Automobile and truck sales and rental (including large truck) P P
Automobile part sales P P
Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) P19 P19
Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) C 12,13,14,19 P12,19
Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service P P
Truck repair (large) P P
Vending cart, private property P P
Warehouse P19 P19
Welding shop P19 P19
Wholesale distribution P19 P19
Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E.
of this title)
Woodworking mill P19 P19
213
Qualifying provisions: 214
1. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. 215
2. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval. 216
3. Electric generating facilities shall be located within 2,640 feet of an existing 138 kV or larger electric power 217
transmission line. 218
4. No railroad freight terminal facility shall be located within 1 mile of a Rresidential Zzoning Ddistrict. 219
5. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Section 21A.36.140 of this title. 220
6. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the 221
place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 222
7. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building’s 223
footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the building’s footprint or new office building 224
construction are subject to a design review. 225
8. A community correctional facility is considered an institutional use and any such facility located within an the 226
AFPP Airport Noise Flight Path Protection Overlay Zone District is subject to the land use and sound attenuation 227
standards for institutional uses of the applicable Airport Overlay influence Zzone within chapter Section 228
21A.34.040 of this title. 229
33
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
9. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than 1/2 mile of other check cashing/payday loan 230
businesses. 231
10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this 232
title. 233
11. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive- through use regulations. 234
12. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Ssingle- or Ttwo-Ffamily Zzoning Ddistrict. 235
13. Prohibited within the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area of the Northwest Quadrant Overlay District. 236
14. Prohibited within the Development Area of the Northwest Quadrant Overlay District. 237
15. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to 238
Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 239
16. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of any Rresidential Zzoning Ddistrict boundary and subject to Section 21A.36.110 of 240
this title. 241
17. Prior to issuance of a building permit in the Development Area and the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area of the 242
Northwest Quadrant Overlay, consultation with the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources is required to obtain 243
recommendations on siting and equipment types for all solar arrays on a particular property to mitigate impacts to 244
wildlife. 245
18. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by 246
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 247
19. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 248
20. Prohibited in the IP Inland Port Overlay District. See Subsection 21A.34.150.B.2.f. 249
250
251
21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS: 252
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS in PDF, click HERE 253
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
254
Use Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Bby
District
D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4
Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically
regulated elsewhere in this title
P P P P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P4
Alcohol:
Bar establishment (indoor) P6 C6 C6 P6
Bar establishment (outdoor) P6 C6 C6 P6
Brewpub (indoor) P6 P6 P6 P6
34
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Brewpub (outdoor) P6 P6 P6 P6
Tavern (indoor) P6 C6 C6 P6
Tavern (outdoor) P6 C6 C6 P6
Animal, veterinary office P P
Antenna, communication tower P P P P
Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum
building height
C C C C
Art gallery P P P P
Artisan food production P 14,18 P18 P18 P18
Bed and breakfast P P P P
Bed and breakfast inn P P P P
Bed and breakfast manor P P P P
Bio-medical facility P17,18 P17,18 P17,18 P17,18
Blood donation center P
Bus line station/terminal P7 P7 P7 P7
Bus line yard and repair facility P
Car wash P3
Check cashing/payday loan business P5
Clinic (medical, dental) P P P P
Commercial food preparation P18 P18 P18 P18
Community garden P P P P
Convention center P
Crematorium P P P
Daycare center, adult P P P P
Daycare center, child P P P P
Daycare, nonregistered home daycare P 12 P 12 P 12 P 12
Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P 12 P 12 P 12 P 12
Dwelling:
Artists’ loft/studio P P P P
Assisted living facility (large) P P P P
Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P P P
Assisted living facility (small) P P P P
Congregate care facility (large) C C C C
Congregate care facility (small) P P P P
Group home (large) C C
Group home (small) P P P P
35
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Multi-family P P P P
Residential support (large) C C
Residential support (small) C C
Exhibition hall P
Farmers’ market P
Financial institution P P P P
Financial institution with drive-through facility P8 P8
Funeral home P P P
Gas station P P7 P7
Government facility C C C C
Government facility requiring special design features for
security purposes
P7 P7
Heliport, accessory C C C
Home occupation P 13 P 13 P 13 P 13
Homeless resource center C 15 C 15
Homeless shelter C 15 C 15
Hotel/motel P P P P
Industrial assembly C18 C18
Laboratory, medical related P18 P18 P18 P18
Laundry, commercial P18
Library P P P P
Limousine service P
Mixed use development P P P P
Mobile food business (operation in the public right-of-way) P P P P
Mobile food business (operation on private property) P P P P
Mobile food court P P P P
Municipal services uses including Ccity utility uses and
police and fire stations
P P P P
Museum P P P P
Office P P P P
Office, publishing company P P P P
Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P7 P7 P7 P7
Park P P P P
Parking, commercial C P C C
Parking, off site P P P P
Performing arts production facility P P P P
36
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Place of worship P11 P11 P11 P11
Radio, television station P P P
Railroad, passenger station P P P P
Reception center P P P P
Recreation (indoor) P P P P
Recreation (outdoor) P
Research and development facility P18 P18 P18 P18
Restaurant P P P P
Restaurant with drive-through facility P8
Retail goods establishment P P P P
Retail service establishment P P P P
Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P P
Sales and display (outdoor) P P P P
School:
College or university P P P P
K - 12 private P P
K - 12 public P P
Music conservatory P P P P
Professional and vocational P P P P
Seminary and religious institute P P P P
Small brewery C18
Social service mission and charity dining hall C C
Stadium C C C
Storage, self P 16 P P
Store:
Department P P P
Fashion oriented department P2
Mass merchandising P P P
Pawnshop P
Specialty P P P
Superstore and hypermarket P
Studio, art P P P P
Technology facility P18 P18 P18 P18
Theater, live performance P9 P9 P9 P9
Theater, movie P P P P
37
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Utility, buildings or structure P1 P1 P1 P1
Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P1 P1 P1 P1
Vehicle:
Automobile repair (major) P P7 P7
Automobile repair (minor) P P7 P7
Automobile sales/rental and service P10 P P10
Vending cart, private property P P P P
Vending cart, public property
Warehouse P18
Warehouse, accessory P P
Wholesale distribution P18
Wireless telecommunications facility (see
sSection 21A.40.090, tTable 21A.40.090.E of this title)
255
Qualifying provisions: 256
1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in sSubsection 21A.02.050.B of this title. 257
2. Uses allowed only within the boundaries and subject to the provisions of the Downtown Main Street Core 258
Overlay District (sSection 21A.34.110 of this title). 259
3. A car wash located within 165 feet (including streets) of a residential use shall not be allowed. 260
4. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building’s 261
footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the building’s footprint or new office building 262
construction are subject to a design review (cChapter 21A.59 of this title). 263
5. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than 1/2 mile of other check cashing/payday loan 264
businesses. 265
6. Subject to conformance with the provisions in sSection 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this 266
title. 267
7. Subject to conformance with the provisions of cChapter 21A.59, “Design Review”, of this title. 268
8. Subject to conformance to the provisions in sSection 21A.40.060 of this title for drive-through use regulations. 269
9. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Ssingle- or Ttwo-Ffamily Zzoning Ddistrict. 270
10. Must be located in a fully enclosed building and entirely indoors. 271
11. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the 272
place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 273
12. Subject to sSection 21A.36.130 of this title. 274
13. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to 275
sSection 21A.36.030 of this title. 276
14. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 277
38
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
15. Subject to conformance with the provisions of sSection 21A.36.350 of this title, the Ccity may not prohibit 278
construction of a homeless resource center or homeless shelter if the site is approved by and receives funding 279
through the State Homeless Coordinating Committee, with the concurrence of the Housing and Community 280
Development Division within the Department of Workforce Services, in accordance with sSection 35A-8-604 of 281
the Utah Code. 282
16. Limited to basement/below ground levels only. Not allowed on the ground or upper levels of the building, with 283
the exception of associated public leasing/office space. 284
17. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by 285
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 286
18. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 287
288
21A.33.060: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE GATEWAY DISTRICT: 289
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE GATEWAY DISTRICT in PDF, click HERE. 290
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
291
Use G-MU
Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this
title
P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment (indoor) P2
Bar establishment (outdoor) P2,5
Brewpub (indoor) P2
Brewpub (outdoor) P2,5
Tavern (indoor) P2
Tavern (outdoor) P2,5
Ambulance service (indoor) C
Amphitheater, formal P
Amphitheater, informal P
Animal, veterinary office P
Antenna, communication tower P
Antenna, communication towers, exceeding the maximum building height C
Art gallery P
Artisan food production P9
Artists’ loft/studio P
Auction (indoor) P
Auditorium P
39
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Bed and breakfast P
Bed and breakfast inn P
Bed and breakfast manor P
Bio-medical facility P8,9
Botanical garden P
Bus line station/terminal P3
Clinic (medical, dental) P
Commercial food preparation P9
Community garden P
Crematorium P
Daycare center, adult P
Daycare center, child P
Daycare, nonregistered home daycare P 6
Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P 6
Dwelling:
Assisted living facility (large) P
Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P
Assisted living facility (small) P
Congregate care facility (large) C
Congregate care facility (small) P
Group home (large) C
Group home (small) when located above or below first story office, retail or
commercial use, or on the first story where the unit is not located adjacent to the street
frontage
P
Living quarters for caretaker or security guard P
Multi-family P
Residential support (large) C
Residential support (small) C
Single-family (attached) P
Equipment rental (indoor and/outdoor) P
Farmers’ market P
Financial institution P
Flea market (indoor) P
Funeral home P
Government facility C
Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P3
40
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Heliport, accessory C
Home occupation P 7
Hotel/motel P
Industrial assembly C9
Laboratory, medical related P9
Large wind energy system P
Library P
Mixed use development P
Mobile food business (operation in the public right-of-way) P
Mobile food business (operation on private property) P
Mobile food court P
Municipal services uses including Ccity utility uses and police and fire stations P
Museum P
Office P
Open space P
Park P
Parking:
Commercial C
Off site P
Park and ride lot C
Park and ride lot shared with existing use P
Performing arts production facility P
Photo finishing lab P9
Place of worship P
Radio, television station C
Reception center P
Recreation (indoor) P
Recreation (outdoor) C
Research and development facility P9
Restaurant P
Retail goods establishment P
Retail goods establishment, plant and garden shop, with outdoor retail sales area P
Retail service establishment P
Retail service establishment, upholstery shop C
School:
41
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
College and university P
K - 12 private P
K - 12 public P
Music conservatory P
Professional and vocational P
Seminary and religious institute P
Seasonal farm stand P
Small brewery C9
Social service mission and charity dining hall C
Solar array P9
Stadium C
Storage, self P3
Store:
Department P
Mass merchandising P
Specialty P
Superstore and hypermarket P
Studio, art P
Studio, motion picture C
Technology facility P9
Theater, live performance P4
Theater, movie P
Urban farm P
Utility, building or structure P1
Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole C
Vehicle:
Automobile repair (minor) P
Automobile sales/rental and service (indoor) P
Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) P
Vending cart, private property P
Vending cart, public property P
Wireless telecommunications facility (see sSection 21A.40.090, tTable 21A.40.090.E of
this title)
Zoological park C
292
Qualifying provisions: 293
42
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in sSubsection 21A.02.050.B of this title. 294
2. Subject to conformance with the provisions of sSection 21A.36.300, ”Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this 295
title. 296
3. Subject to conformance with the provisions of cChapter 21A.59, “Design Review”, of this title. 297
4. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Ssingle- or Ttwo-Ffamily Zzoning Ddistrict. 298
5. Subject to the requirements set forth in sSection 21A.40.065, “Outdoor Dining”, of this title. 299
6. Subject to sSection 21A.36.130 of this title. 300
7. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to 301
sSection 21A.36.030 of this title. 302
8. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by 303
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 304
9. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 305
No conditional use permit shall be granted for any property which abuts a Rresidential Zzoning Ddistrict, except for 306
places of worship, public/private utilities and related facilities, residential facilities for persons with a disability and 307
educational facilities. 308
43
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
21A.33.070: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS: 309
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS in PDF, click HERE 310
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
311
Use Permitted Aand Conditional Uses Bby District
RP BP FP AG AG-2 AG-5 AG-20 OS NOS A PL PL-2 I UI MH EI MU
Accessory use, except those that are otherwise
specifically regulated elsewhere in this title
P P P P P P P P 20 P P P P P P P P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark site C2 C2 C2 P2
Agricultural use C P P P P P P
Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility P P
Airport P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment (2,500 square feet or less in floor
area)
C12
Brewpub (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) P12 C12
Brewpub (more than 2,500 square feet in floor area) P12
Tavern (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) C12
Ambulance service (indoor) P P
Ambulance service (outdoor) P10 P10
Amphitheater, formal P C
Amphitheater, informal P P
44
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Animal:
Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger C P8 P8 P8 P8
Pet cemetery P4 P4 P4 P4 P4,5
Stable (private) P P P P
Stable (public) P P P P
Veterinary office P P
Antenna, communication tower P P C P P P P P 21 P P C P P P
Antenna, communication tower exceeding the maximum
building height in the zone
C C P 21 P P11 C C C
Art gallery P P P P P P
Artisan food production P24 P18,
24
Bed and breakfast P2 P P
Bed and breakfast inn P2 P P
Bed and breakfast manor P2 P P
Bio-medical facility P23,24 P23,24 P23,
24
P23,
24
Botanical garden P P P P
Cannabis production establishment P P P P P
Cemetery P
Clinic (medical, dental) P P P P P
45
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Commercial food preparation P24 P24
Community garden P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Convent/monastery P P
Data center P24
Daycare center, adult P P P P P P P P
Daycare center, child P P P P P P P P P
Daycare, nonregistered home daycare P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16
Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16 P 16
Dwelling:
Accessory unit P P P P P P
Assisted living facility (large) C P P
Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P P P
Assisted living facility (small) P P P
Congregate care facility (large) C C C
Congregate care facility (small) P P P
Group home (large) C
Group home (small) P P P P
Living quarters for caretaker or security guard P P P C P P P P
Manufactured home P P P
46
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Mobile home P
Multi-family P P
Residential support (large) C
Residential support (small) P
Rooming (boarding) house P
Single-family (attached) P
Single-family (detached) P P P P
Twin home and two-family P
Exhibition hall C P C P
Extractive industry P24
Fairground C
Farm stand, seasonal P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Financial institution P P P
Financial institution with drive-through facility P14 P14
Gas station P7
Golf course P24 P24 P24
Government facility C C P P P P P 20 P C C C13 C P C
Government facility requiring special design features for
security purposes
C C
Government office P P P P P P P P
47
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Heliport C C P P C C
Home occupation P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17 P 17
Hospital, including accessory lodging facility C P P
Hotel/motel C C P P
Hunting club, duck P
Industrial assembly P24 P24
Jail C
Jewelry fabrication P
Laboratory, medical related P24 P24 P24 P24 P24
Large wind energy system C C C C C C C P P
Library P P P P P
Light manufacturing C24 P24
Manufacturing, concrete or asphalt P15,
24
Meeting hall of membership organization P P P P P
Mixed use development P
Mobile food business (operation on private property) P P P P P
Municipal service uses, including Ccity utility uses and
police and fire stations
C C P P P P P C C C14 C P C
Museum C P P P P P P
48
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Nursing care facility P P P
Office P P P P P P P P
Open space P P P P P P P P P9 P P P P P P P P
Park P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Parking:
Commercial C
Off site P P P P P C
Off site (to support uses in an OS or NOS Zzoning
Ddistrict)
P
Park and ride lot P C
Park and ride lot shared with existing use P P P P P P P P
Performing arts production facility P P
Philanthropic use P P P P
Place of worship P P P P P
Radio, television station P6 P
Reception center C22 C P P P P
Recreation (indoor) C P P P P P P
Recreation (outdoor) P P P P
Research and development facility P24 P24 P24 P24 P24
Restaurant P7 P
49
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Restaurant with drive-through facility P7,14 P3
Retail goods establishment P7 P P
Retail, sales and service accessory use when located
within a principal building
P20 P
Retail, sales and service accessory use when located
within a principal building and operated primarily for
the convenience of employees
P P P P P P P P P
Retail service establishment P
School:
College or university P P P
K - 12 private P P P P
K - 12 public P P P P
Music conservatory P P P
Professional and vocational P P P P P
Seminary and religious institute P P C
Small brewery C24
Solar array P24 P24 P19,
24
P24 P24 P24
Stadium C C C
Storage, accessory (outdoor) P P P P
Studio, art P
50
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Technology facility P24 P24 P24 P24
Theater, live performance C15 C15 C15 C15 C15 C15 C15
Theater, movie C C
Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking P
Urban farm P P P P P P P P P P P P
Utility, building or structure P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
Vehicle, automobile rental agency P P
Vending cart, private property P P
Vending cart, public property P
Warehouse P24 P24
Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business
(maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate)
P
Wholesale distribution P24 P24
Wireless telecommunications facility (see
Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title)
Zoological park P
312
Qualifying provisions: 313
1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title. 314
2. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources. 315
51
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
3. When located on an arterial street. 316
4. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval. 317
5. In conjunction with, and within the boundaries of, a cemetery for human remains. 318
6. Radio station equipment and antennas shall be required to go through the site plan review process to ensure that the color, design and location of all 319
proposed equipment and antennas are screened or integrated into the architecture of the project and are compatible with surrounding uses. 320
7. When approved as part of a business park planned development pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 21A.55 of this title. 321
8. Kennels, whether within penned enclosures or within enclosed buildings, shall not be permitted within 200 feet of an existing single-family dwelling on an 322
adjacent lot. 323
9. Trails and trailheads with signage are subject to Section 21A.46.120, “Sign Regulations Ffor Special Purpose Districts”, of this title. 324
10. Greater than 3 ambulances at location require a conditional use. 325
11. Maximum of 1 monopole per property and only when it is government owned and operated for public safety purposes. 326
12. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 327
13. If located on a collector or arterial street according to the Salt Lake City Transportation Master Plan - mMajor sStreet pPlan: rRoadway fFunctional 328
cClassification map. 329
14. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive-through use regulations. 330
15. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Ssingle- or Ttwo-Ffamily Zzoning Ddistrict. 331
16. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 332
17. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 333
18. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 334
19. Prior to issuance of a building permit in the Development Area and the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area of the Northwest Quadrant Overlay, consultation with 335
the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources is required to obtain recommendations on siting and equipment types for all solar arrays on a particular property 336
to mitigate impacts to wildlife. 337
20. When customarily provided with the principal use and is accessory to the principal use. 338
21. New antennae and communication towers are allowed outside the telecommunication corridor in the OS Open Space District for public safety, public 339
security or Salt Lake City Public Utilities Department purposes only. 340
52
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
22. Reception centers may be allowed in parks of 100 acres or more where the reception center is a subordinate use to the principal use of the property as a 341
park. Reception centers are allowed in existing buildings, are limited to 1 reception center per park, and hours of operation are limited to park hours. 342
Removal of existing recreation areas to accommodate the stand alone reception center use, including areas to accommodate parking for the reception 343
center use, is not permitted. 344
23. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental 345
Quality administrative rules. 346
24. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 347
348
53
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
21A.33.080: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN FORM BASED DISTRICTS: 349
To view TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN FORM BASED DISTRICTS in PDF, click HERE 350
Note: Uses which are not listed in the following table are not permitted in any Form Based Code Zoning District. 351
Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted
352
Use Permitted and Conditional Uses Bby District
FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-SC FB-SE
Accessory use, except those that are specifically regulated
in this chapter, or elsewhere in this title
P P P P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment P P C
Brewpub P P C
Tavern, 2,500 square feet or less in floor area P P C
Animal, veterinary office P P P
Antenna, communication tower P P P
Art gallery P P P
Artisan food production P3,5 P3,5 P3,5
Bed and breakfast P P P P
Bed and breakfast inn P P P P
Bed and breakfast manor P P P P
Bio-medical facility P4,5 P4,5
Clinic (medical, dental) P P P
Commercial food preparation P5 P5 P5
Community garden P P P P
Community recreation center P P P
Daycare center, adult P P P
Daycare center, child P P P
Daycare, nonregistered home daycare P1 P1 P1 P1
Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P1 P1 P1 P1
Dwelling:
Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P P P P
Assisted living facility (small) P P P
Congregate care facility (large) C C C
Congregate care facility (small) C
Group home (large) P P P
54
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Group home (small) when located above or below first
story office, retail, or commercial use, or on the first
story where the unit is not located adjacent to street
frontage
P P P
Multi-family P P P
Residential support (large) P
Residential support (small) P
Rooming (boarding) house P
Single-family attached P P P
Single-family detached P
Single-family detached (cottage development building
form only)
P P
Single room occupancy P
Two-family P
Farmers’ market P P P
Financial institution P P P
Funeral home P P P
Government facility P P P P
Health and fitness facility P P P
Home occupation P2 P2 P2 P2
Hotel/motel P P
House museum in landmark site P P P P
Laboratory, medical related P5 P5 P5
Library P P P
Mixed use developments including residential and other
uses allowed in the zoning district
P P P
Municipal service uses, including Ccity utility uses and
police and fire stations
P P P P
Museum P P P
Nursing care facility P P P
Office P P P
Office and/or reception center in landmark site P P P
Open space P P P P
Park P P P P
Parking, off site P P P P
Photo finishing lab P5 P5
Place of worship P P P
55
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Plazas P P P P
Recreation (indoor) P P P
Research and development facility P5 P5 P5
Restaurant P P P
Retail goods establishment P P P
Retail goods establishment, plant and garden shop with
outdoor retail sales area
P P P
Retail service establishment P P P
Sales and display (outdoor) P P P
School:
College or university P P P
Music conservatory P P P
Professional and vocational P P P
Seminary and religious institute P P P
Seasonal farm stand P P P
Solar array P5 P5 P5
Store, specialty P P P
Studio, art P P P
Technology facility P5 P5 P5
Theater, movie P P P
Urban farm P P P P
Utility, building or structure P P P P
Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe, or pole P P P P
Vending cart, private property P P P
Wireless telecommunications facility P P P
353
Qualifying provisions: 354
1. Subject to sSection 21A.36.130 of this title. 355
2. Subject to sSection 21A.36.030 of this title. 356
3. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 357
4. Prohibited within ½ mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by 358
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 359
5. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 360
56
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.60.020. That Section 361
21A.60.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (List of Defined Terms) shall be and hereby is amended as follows: 362
a. Adding the Term “Anticipated Daily Water Use Report”. That Section 21A.60.040 363
shall be and hereby is amended to add the term “Anticipated Daily Water Use Report”, which term shall 364
be inserted into Section 21A.60.020 in alphabetical order and shall read as follows: 365
Anticipated Daily Water Use Report. 366
b. Adding the Term “Potable water”. That Section 21A.60.040 shall be and hereby is 367
amended to add the term “Potable water”, which term shall be inserted into Section 21A.60.020 in 368
alphabetical order and shall read as follows: 369
Potable water. 370
SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section 371
21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Definitions of Terms) shall be and hereby is amended as follows: 372
a. Amending the Definition of “BOTTLING PLANT”. That the definition of the term, 373
“BOTTLING PLANT” provided in Section 21A.62.040 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 374
BOTTLING PLANT: An establishment commercial facility for the purpose of that engages in the 375
bottling, canning, or filling of any container of with beverages for distribution. The term “bottling 376
plant” shall not include any beverage or food manufacturing type use which is otherwise listed 377
specifically in the table of permitted and conditional uses found in Chapter 21A.33 of this title. 378
379
b. Adding the Definition “ANTICIPATED DAILY WATER USE REPORT”. That 380
Section 21A.62.040 shall be and hereby is amended to add the definition “ANTICIPATED DAILY 381
WATER USE REPORT”, which definition shall be inserted into Section 21A.62.040 in alphabetical 382
order and shall read as follows: 383
57
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
ANTICIPATED DAILY WATER USE REPORT: A detailed report provided by an applicant that 384
demonstrates the anticipated daily use and/or consumption of water for the described use based on 385
commonly accepted standards within the water utility industry. 386
c. Adding the Definition “POTABLE WATER”. That Section 21A.62.040 shall be and 387
hereby is amended to add the definition “POTABLE WATER”, which definition shall be inserted into 388
Section 21A.62.040 in alphabetical order and shall read as follows: 389
POTABLE WATER: Water that is safe for human consumption and provided by the Salt Lake City 390
Department of Public Utilities. 391
392
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance take effect immediately after it has been published in 393
accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-713. 394
395
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2021. 396
______________________________ 397
CHAIRPERSON 398
ATTEST: 399
400
______________________________ 401
CITY RECORDER 402
403
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 404
405
406
407
408
409
410
58
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
411
Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 412
413
______________________________ 414
MAYOR 415
______________________________ 416
CITY RECORDER 417
418
(SEAL) 419
420
Bill No. ________ of 2021. 421
Published: ______________. 422
Ordinance regulating high water uses (legislative) 423
1. CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Significant Water Consuming Land Uses Text Amendment
Petition PLNPCM2021-00638
June 17, 2021 Petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall. Planning Division begins
work on proposal with Public Utilities Department.
July 8, 2021 Project website posted on City website with draft of the ordinance. Public
notices sent to recognized community organizations and Planning listserv.
July 8, 2021 Temporary water use limit ordinance officially imposed. Official temporary
ordinance notification sent to Planning listserv, posted on state website,
and posted on City Planning website.
August 16, 2021 Proposal presented to the Sugar House Community Council Land Use and
Zoning Committee
August 27, 2021 Proposal presented to the Glendale Community Council Chair.
August 31, 2021 Notices mailed to potentially impacted businesses and property owners
based on City data research.
September 8,
2021
Proposal presented to the City’s Business Advisory Board.
September 9,
2021
Public notices for September 22 Planning Commission meeting mailed to
potentially impacted businesses/property owners, sent out via Planning
listserv, including to recognized organizations. and posted on City Planning
Division and State notice websites
September 22,
2021
Planning Commission holds public hearing on the proposal. Planning
Commission votes unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to
the City Council.
2. NOTICE OF CITY
COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2021-00635 – Significant Water
Consuming Land Uses – A request by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to amend the text of the zoning
ordinance related to land uses that consume significant amounts of water. The proposal would
implement a 300,000-gallon a day limit on the amount of water that commercial and industrial
land uses can utilize. The limit affects multiple zones and multiple land uses citywide. The
ordinance also amends and clarifies the definitions of related land use terms. Other related
standards of Title 21A Zoning may be amended as part of this petition. Information on the
proposal can found on the City’s webpage for the proposal at the following website:
https://www.slc.gov/planning/2021/07/07/significant-water-users-text-amendment/
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive
comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE:
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b). Please visit
https://www.slc.gov/council/news/featured-news/virtually-attend-city-
council-meetings/ to learn how you can share your comments live during
electronic City Council meetings. If you would like to provide feedback or
comment, via email or phone, please contact us at: 801-535-7654 (24-
Hour comment line) or by email at: council.comments@slcgov.com .
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Daniel Echeverria at 801-535-7165 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday or via e-mail at daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. (P 19-19)
3. ORIGINAL PETITION
Page 1
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
Petition Initiation
Request
To: Mayor Mendenhall
From: Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director
Date: June 6, 2021
CC: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Blake Thomas, CAN Director; file
Re: Initiating an amendment to Title 21A, the Zoning Ordinance, to review land use types that
involve significant water consumption
This memo is to request that you initiate a petition for the Planning Division to begin the process of amending the
zoning ordinance to review land use types that may involve significant water consumption and prohibit land uses
that exceed an average water usage of gallons per day. The current extreme drought situation may have heightened
the urgency to ensure that future land uses do not threaten Salt Lake City’s ability to provide water to all of its
residents and businesses, but this is a reality we would have to confront in the near future anyway as we plan for
growth in our desert climate.
The Division prepare a land use ordinance to:
1. Prohibit new land uses that would likely consume more than an annual average of 300,000 gallons of water per
day;
2. Restrict the expansion of existing land use types that consume more than an annual average of 300,000 gallons
of water per day;
3. Review existing land use regulations for potential revisions to mitigate demands on the city’s water supply; and
4. Amend definitions and land use tables to clarify that “bottling plant” includes the filling of various container
forms with a liquid product generated from culinary water, and is further, prohibited city-wide. Such
amendments shall continue to allow for small scale alcohol beverage production.
The Planning Division may declare application of the “pending ordinance rule”, which is established in Utah Code
Section 10-9a-509 as a means of prohibiting certain uses for up to 180 days from the time a land use regulation
petition is initiated. The 180-day period is intended to give the municipality time to get the petition through the
planning commission and city council processes.The adoption process of the resulting ordinance will include review
and recommendation by the Planning Commission prior to a review and decision by the City Council.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Page 2
Concurrence to initiating the zoning amendment petition as noted above.
_________________________________ _______________
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date
06/07/2021
4. MAILING LIST
Name Address City State ZIP
Utah Inland Port Authority
ATTN: Jack Hedge 111 South Main Street Suite 550 Salt Lake City UT 84111
Henkel Corporation 3540 W 1987 South Salt Lake City UT 84104
BCG Beverage LLC 1911 S 3850 W Salt Lake City UT 84104
Airgas USA LLC 5190 W 700 South Salt Lake City UT 84104
DS Services of America 1825 S 3730 W Salt Lake City UT 84104
Ice Cold Empire SLC LLC 1675 S Empire Road Salt Lake City UT 84104
Meadow Gold Dairies 3730 W 1820 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Staker & Parson Companies 3313 W Directors Row Salt Lake City UT 84104
Sweet Candy Company 3780 W Directors Row Salt Lake City UT 84104
Tesoro Logistics Operations LLC 474 W 900 N Salt Lake City UT 84103
Thatcher Company 1265 S Wallace Rd Salt Lake City UT 84104
Actavis Laboratories 575 S Chipeta Way Salt Lake City UT 84108
White Wave Foods 11039 S Albion Pass Ct South Jordan Ut 84095
DS Services of America
2300 WINDY RIDGE PARKWAY STE
500N Atlanta GA 30339
Ice Cold Empire SLC LLC 1656 Reunion Ave South Jordan UT 84095
Meadow Gold Dairies PO BOX 26817 Salt Lake City UT 84126
Staker & Parson Companies PO BOX 3429 Ogden UT 84409
Sweet Candy Company PO BOX 22450 Salt Lake City UT 84122
Tesoro Logistics Operations LLC 539 S Main St St Findlay OH 45840
Thatcher Company PO BOX 27407 Salt Lake City UT 84127
Danone North America 1658 S 4370 W Salt Lake City UT 84104
CURRENT OCCUPANT 1722 S FREMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84104
CURRENT OCCUPANT 1745 S MILESTONE Dr STE 3B Salt Lake City UT 84104
CURRENT OCCUPANT 132 S 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84104
CURRENT OCCUPANT 2030 N REDWOOD STE 70 Salt Lake City UT 84116
CURRENT OCCUPANT 5447 W 700 S STE B Salt Lake City UT 84104
ROHA BREWING PROJECT LLC 30 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115
TOASTED BARREL BREWERY 412 W 600 N Salt Lake City UT 84103
RED ROCK BREWERY LC 443 N 400 W Salt Lake City UT 84103
BCG BEVERAGE LLC 1911 S 3850 W Salt Lake City UT 84104
PROPER BREWING COMPANY LLC 857 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111
Perfect Water & Essentials LLC 2484 W CUSTER RD Salt Lake City UT 84104
PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, THE 3388 W 1987 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
UINTA BREWING COMPANY 1722 S FREMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84104
Reddy Ice LLC 1675 S EMPIRE RD Salt Lake City UT 84104
MOUNTAIN WEST CIDER COMPANY
LLC 425 N 400 W Salt Lake City UT 84103
HIGH WEST DISTILLERY, LLC 3555 W 1500 S STE B Salt Lake City UT 84104
TEMPLIN FAMILY BREWING 936 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84101
KIITOS BREWING LLC 608 W 700 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
HAMMER SPRING DISTILLERS INC 3697 W 1987 S BLD 5 Salt Lake City UT 84104
PURE WATER TECHNOLOGIES #1 LLC 11 S JEREMY Salt Lake City UT 84104
L3 Communications 640 N 2200 West Salt Lake City UT 84116
C7 Data Centers 179 E Social Hall AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111
CCI Bakery 902 E LOGAN AVE Salt Lake City UT 84105
CAVALCANTI & VERTAMATTI FOODS
LLC 850 S 3600 W STE F Salt Lake City UT 84104
DRUPEFRUIT 161 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84101
THE NUT GARDEN 3528 W 500 S STE 7 Salt Lake City UT 84104
HONEST JOHN BITTERS CO 331 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111
SUGAR & VICE CORP 57 W 200 S STE 102 Salt Lake City UT 84101
BROOKE & BRADFORD LLC 759 S GLADIOLA ST STE 1 Salt Lake City UT 84104
PRIME SNAX 1750 S 500 W STE 700 Salt Lake City UT 84115
SLC Chow, LLC 751 W 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Chili Beak 751 W 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
GARDEN GATE 928 E 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84105
LA DIANA LLC 46 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104
BARBACOA MEXICAN GRILL 1335 S 700 W Salt Lake City UT 84104
RICO BRAND 945 W FOLSOM AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
L3 COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
WEST 1220 N 2200 W STE 800 Salt Lake City UT 84116
CREMINELLI FINE MEATS LLC 310 N WRIGHT BROTHERS DR Salt Lake City UT 84116
READY WISE INC
3676 W CALIFORNIA AVE STE
B106 Salt Lake City UT 84104
THE CHOCOLATE CONSPIRACY 774 S 300 W STE A Salt Lake City UT 84101
COOKIETREE INC 4010 W ADVANTAGE CIR Salt Lake City UT 84104
Streusel 67 W 1700 S Salt Lake City UT 84115
HOWEY SALT LAKE LLC 675 E 2100 S STE J Salt Lake City UT 84106
LA DIANA TORTILLA AND BAKERY
FACTORY LLC 927 W FOLSOM AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
THE BEAN WHOLE 2153 E 2100 S Salt Lake City UT 84109
LA MEXICANA TORTILLERIA LLC 964 S 200 W STE 3 Salt Lake City UT 84101
VMI NUTRITION INC 391 S ORANGE ST STE E Salt Lake City UT 84104
LOS ANGELES BREAD TWO INC.3683 W 1987 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
CINTAS CORPORATION 1586 S 5350 W STE A Salt Lake City UT 84104
NABISCO INC 4275 W 1980 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
CONDIE MASTERCRAFT CANDY CO 1479 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115
BAGLEY ICE & CARBONIC 221 W PARAMOUNT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115
AMOUR CAFE 1329 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84105
GRANITE BAKERY 902 E 2700 S Salt Lake City UT 84106
PANADERIA FLORES INC 1625 W 700 N STE F Salt Lake City UT 84116
MEADOW GOLD DAIRIES 3730 W 1820 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
GAF PROPERTIES II LLC 61 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
GAF PROPERTIES I LLC 71 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
MARTIN-BROWER COMPANY 1790 S 5200 W NORT Salt Lake City UT 84104
GAF PROPERTIES III, LLC 607 E 100 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
HK BREWING COLLECTIVE, LLC 751 W 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
WIO SMART FOODS INC 729 W 1700 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Solstice Malt 3528 W 500 S STE 6 Salt Lake City UT 84104
Vive Juicery LLC 1597 S 1100 E Salt Lake City UT 84105
BLUE CHIP GROUP INC 1911 S 3850 W Salt Lake City UT 84104
TULIE BAKERY 863 E 700 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
KINGS PEAK COFFEE LLC 412 S 700 W STE 140 Salt Lake City UT 84104
CREMINELLI FINE MEATS, LLC 310 N WRIGHT BROTHERS DR Salt Lake City UT 84116
Z NECTAR, LLC 918 S 500 W Salt Lake City UT 84101
DFS Gourmet Specialties Inc.
3195 W PROFESSIONAL CIR STE
300 Salt Lake City UT 84104
Raw Eddys 751 W 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
DREAM DINNERS OPERATIONS 1140 E BRICKYARD RD STE 28 Salt Lake City UT 84106
BITTERS LAB 850 S 400 W STE 117 Salt Lake City UT 84101
STONE GROUND BAKERY 1025 S 700 W Salt Lake City UT 84104
TOSCA SERVICES LLC 5950 W AMELIA EARHART DR Salt Lake City UT 84116
LAKEVIEW CHEESE PRODUCTS, LLC 1755 S FREMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84104
FILLINGS & EMULSIONS 1475 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115
NUSH FOODS 333 W HOPE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115
MADBROOK DONUT COMPANY 1391 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84115
PROBAR LLC 190 N APOLLO Salt Lake City UT 84116
VEGETABLE EXPRESS LLC 46 S ORANGE ST STE C Salt Lake City UT 84116
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE: November 16, 2021
RE:Rezone: 835 S Redwood Road &
1668 W Indiana Avenue
from R-1/5,000 to R-MU-45
PLNPCM2021-00249
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: November 16, 2021
Set Date: November 16, 2021
Public Hearing: Dec 7, 2021
Potential Action: Dec 7 or 14
2021
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning of properties at
approximately 835 South Redwood Road and 1668 West Indiana Avenue from R-1/5,000 (Single-Family
Residential District) to R-MU-45 (Residential/Mixed Use District). The property at 1668 West Indiana
currently contains an individual single-family dwelling while the other property is vacant. No specific site
development proposal has been submitted at this time. However, the applicant has indicated that if the
zoning change is approved, they intend to consolidate the parcels and develop a mixed use on the
combined property with ground floor commercial/retail and upper floor apartments.
The change is consistent with changes identified in the Westside Master Plan which identified the
intersection of Redwood and Indiana as the location of a future Community Node.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 9, 2021 and forwarded a positive
recommendation to the City Council by a majority vote of 4-2.
Page | 2
Vicinity and Zoning Map
(pages 2-3 of the Planning Commission Staff report)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Page | 3
Pages 3-6 of the Planning Commission staff reports includes a discussion about the key issues
identified by the Planning Staff. A short summary of those is provided below. See the Planning
Commission staff report to view the full analysis.
1. Neighborhood and City-Wide Master Plan Considerations
Planning Staff found the proposed change is generally in compliance with the Westside
Master Plan and vision for this intersection as a future Community Node. A community
Node is defined as:
o Community nodes are larger in scale than their neighborhood counterparts
because they generally offer retail and services that attract people from a
larger area. While some existing community nodes do not have residential
components, new developments at these locations should incorporate housing.
These nodes provide good opportunities to add density with multifamily
residential units. Densities should be on the order of 20 to 30 dwelling units
per acre with appropriate building forms to complement adjacent lower
density uses if necessary. Accessory dwelling units (ADUs), which are fully
separate dwelling units that are located on the same lot as the primary
residence, may be appropriate at community nodes. ADUs are an effective
way to increase density within the stable areas, especially with the
community’s deep single-family lots. Retailers such as grocery stores, clothing
stores or small professional offices are appropriate anchors for community
nodes. These nodes can also be anchored around or include institutional uses,
such as churches, schools or daycares. Community nodes should be
comfortable and safe for pedestrians and bicyclists while providing some off-
site parking that is located behind or to the side of the buildings. Developments
around these type of nodes should also be accessible to regular public
transportation service.”
Planning Staff found the proposed zoning map amendment and overall project is
aligned with the vision and guiding principles contained in Plan Salt Lake and are
supported by policies and strategies that encourage neighborhoods: that provide a safe
environment and opportunity for social interaction, provide people with choices about
where they live and support local businesses.
2. Change in Zoning and Compatibility with Adjacent Properties
Planning staff found given the location of the property and surrounding zoning, the
change in zoning from R-1/5000 to R-MU-45 on these properties would be appropriate
in the context of the area and would not lead to changes that are out of character or
incompatible with the existing development in the area.
The requested R-MU-45 zoning allows for commercial, multi-family and mixed uses
that are not allowed under the current zoning. Since the proposed zone abuts single
family residential zoning, the height limit in the R-MU-45 zoning district would be
strictly limited to 45-feet.
o There is not a process to exceed that height.
Page | 4
When abutting single or two-family zoning, a landscaping buffer of 10-feet would be
required.
The side yard setback would have to be increased one foot (1') for every one foot (1')
increase in height above thirty feet (30') on the subject property.
o The building may be stepped so taller portions of a building are farther away
from the side property line
3. Housing Mitigation Loss Requirements
If the properties are developed strictly for a commercial use without a residential
component, the removal of the existing dwelling would be subject to the provisions of
Chapter 18.97 – Mitigation of Residential Housing Loss of City Code.
o The applicant would have to pay a mitigation fee for removing the existing
housing unit.
o The application and process would be reviewed by the Housing Advisory and
Appeals Board (HAAB).
Note: The Council may wish to ask the Administration for a status update on potential
changes to the Housing Loss Mitigation program and Gentrification/Displacement
study.
4. Consideration of Alternate Zoning Districts
Planning Staff considered and analyzed different zoning districts for the property,
including; Corridor Commercial, Residential Mixed Used-35. But ultimately supported
the applicant’s request for R-MU-45.
PUBLIC PROCESS
The public process is outlined on page two of the transmittal letter. It met the standard requirements
of noticing surrounding property owners, informing the Community Council and a public hearing at
the Planning Commission.
No formal comments have been submitted, nor objections raised in regard to the proposed changes.
Planning Commission
Redwood Road & Indiana Avenue Adjacent Zoning
Planning Commission
Redwood Road & Indiana Avenue Aerial Overview
Planning Commission
Westside Master Plan
Planning Commission
R-MU-45 Limitations by Single-Family
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: Redwood Road and Indiana Avenue Zoning Map Amendment
STAFF CONTACT: David J. Gellner, AICP, Senior Planner, david.gellner@slcgov.com
(385) 226-3860
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to approve an Ordinance to amend the zoning map for the subject properties,
changing them from R-1/5000 (Single-Family Residential) to R-MU-45 (Residential/Mixed
Use).
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Property owner Khiem Tran requesting that the City amend
the zoning map for two (2) properties located at 835 S Redwood Road and 1668 W Indiana Avenue
respectively. The property at 1668 W Indiana currently contains an individual single-family
dwelling while the other property is vacant. The applicant is requesting to change the zoning map
designation of the property from R-1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential) to R-MU-45
(Residential/Mixed Use). No specific site development proposal has been submitted at this time.
The change is consistent with changes identified in the Westside Master Plan which identified the
intersection of Redwood and Indiana as the location of a future Community Node. The Master
Plan is not being changed.
The subject properties are highlighted on the zoning map/aerial photo below.
October 18, 2021
Lisa Shaffer (Oct 19, 2021 16:00 MDT)
10/19/2021
10/19/2021
PUBLIC PROCESS:
• Notice of the project and request for comments sent to the Chair of the Poplar Grove
Community Council on March 25, 2021.
• Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property
owners located within 300 feet of the project site on March 25, 2021 providing notice
about the project and information on how to give public input on the project.
• Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal. The
Online Open House period started on March 29, 2021 and ended on May 10, 2021.
• No formal comments were submitted by the Poplar Grove Community Council.
• No public comments were submitted in relation to this proposal.
• A Planning Commission Public Hearing was held on June 9, 2021. By a majority vote of
4-2, the Planning Commission forwarded a Positive recommendation to City Council for
the proposed zoning map change.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a) PC Agenda of June 9, 2021 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes of June 9, 2021 (Click to Access)
c) Planning Commission Staff Report of June 9, 2021 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3. Original Petition
4. Mailing List
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2021
(Amending the zoning of the properties located at approximately 835 South Redwood Road and
1668 West Indiana Avenue from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to R-MU-45
Residential/Mixed Use District.)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to the properties located at 835 South
Redwood Road and 1668 West Indiana Avenue from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential
District to R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-
00249.
WHEREAS, the property owner, Khiem Tran, submitted a petition number
PLNPCM2021-00249 (the rezone petition ) to rezone the properties located at 835 South
Redwood Road and 1668 West Indiana Avenue (Tax ID Nos. 15-10-205-016 and 15-10-205-
017, respectively -1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to R-
MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the underlying R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000 zoning, the parcels are
further zoned with an overlay zoning designation of Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay; and
WHEREAS, at its June 9, 2021 meeting, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a
public hearing, had discussion, and voted to forward a recommendation of approval to the Salt
Lake City Council (the City Council ) on the rezone petition; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that
adopting this ordinance to amend the Salt Lake City zoning map to change the underlying zoning
as set forth herein ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to retain the overlay designation of the Airport Flight
Path Protection Overlay, and, nothing contained herein should be construed to remove that existing
designation.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the Properties located at 835 South Redwood Road and 1668
West Indiana Avenue, more particularly described and
incorporated by reference shall be and hereby are rezoned from R-1/5000 Single-Family
Residential District to R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District.
SECTION 2.Effective Date. This Ordinance take effect immediately after it has been published
in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-713
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 20___.
Published: ______________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Hannah Vickery,Senior City Attorney
6/17/2021
Legal Description for the Properties to be Rezoned:
Address: 835 South Redwood Road
Tax ID No. 15-10-205-016
LOT 2, TRAN SUBDIVISION
Contains 5,663 sq feet or 0.13 acres more or less.
Address: 1668 West Indiana Avenue
Tax ID No. 15-10-205-017
LOT 1, TRAN SUBDIVISION
Contains 6,432 sq feet or 0.1456 acres more or less.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3. Original Petition
4. Mailing List
1. Project Chronology
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
PETITION: PLNPCM2021-00249 - Redwood Road & Indiana Avenue
Zoning Map Amendment
March 22, 2021 Petition for the zoning map amendment received by the Salt Lake
City Planning Division
March 23, 2021 Petition assigned to David Gellner, Principal Planner, for staff
analysis and processing.
March 25, 2021 Information about the proposal was sent to the Chair of the Poplar
Grove Community Council in order to solicit public comments and
start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment
period.
March 25, 2021 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all
residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project
site providing information about the proposal and how to give
public input on the project.
March 29, 2021 Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on
the proposal. The Online Open House period started on March 29,
2021 and ended on May 10, 2021.
May 10, 2021 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations
ended. No formal comments were submitted to staff by the
recognized organizations to date related to this proposal.
May 27, 2021 Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the
Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting of May
26, 2021. Public hearing notice mailed.
May 27, 2021 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of
the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the
properties.
May 27, 2021 The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on June 9, 2021.
By a majority vote of 4-2, the Planning Commission forwarded a
Positive recommendation to City Council for the proposed zoning
map change.
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2021-00249 – Zoning Map
Amendment at Redwood Road & Indiana Avenue – Khiem Tran, the property owner is requesting
that the City amend the zoning map for two (2) properties located at 835 S Redwood Road and
1668 W Indiana Avenue respectively. The property at 1668 W Indiana currently contains an
individual single-family dwelling while the other property is vacant. The applicant is requesting
to change the zoning map designation of the property from R-1/5,000 (Single-Family
Residential) to R-MU-45 (Residential/Mixed Use). No specific site development proposal has
been submitted at this time. The change is consi stent with changes identified in the Westside
Master Plan which identified the intersection of Redwood and Indiana as the location of a future
Community Node. The Master Plan is not being changed. The property is located within Council
District 2, represented by Dennis Faris. (Staff contact: David J. Gellner at (385) 226 -3860 or
david.gellner@slcgov.com )
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive
comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE:
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b). Please visit
https://www.slc.gov/council/news/featured-news/virtually-attend-city-
council-meetings/ to learn how you can share your comments live during
electronic City Council meetings. If you would like to provide feedback or
comment, via email or phone, please contact us at: 801-535-7654 (24-
Hour comment line) or by email at: council.comments@slcgov.com .
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
David Gellner at 385-226-3860 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday or via e-mail at david.gellner@slcgov.com
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.(P 19-19)
3. Original Petition
Zoning Map Amendment - Khiem Tran
Date:
Mar. 18, 2021
Project Description
A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment.
The Westside community identified several existing and potential community nodes
during outreach and engagement activities. Some nodes were clearly popular choices:
Redwood Road at Indiana Avenue is an example of a potential node that was
mentioned.
The two properties that have Parcel #15102050160000 and 15102050170000 located
at 835 S Redwood Road and 1668 W Indiana Avenue Salt Lake City, UT, 84104,
respectively, are currently zoned as R-1/5000 (single-family residential), and I propose
to change the zone to RMU-45.
A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned.
My buildings would support the Westside Master Plan, which designates the
intersection of Redwood Road and Indiana Avenue as a "Community Node". Rezoning
the property to RMU-45 would allow me to build a complex that supports multi-family
apartments and commercial/retail business rather than two single-family homes.
Specifically, the ground level of the buildings would be for commercial/retail business.
The upper levels would be multi-family apartments. Each floor would have three to four
apartments, with either two or three bedrooms and approximately 1200-1400 square
feet per apartment. This would promote the desired reinvestment and redevelopment
that the Westside Master Plan describes. This location would be appealing to families
with easy access to Salt Lake City and the freeway.
These buildings would promote reinvestment and redevelopment in the Westside
community through changes in land use, improved public infrastructure, and community
investment. Businesses such as grocery stores, clothing stores, fast food and sit-down
restaurants, and offices would be convenient for both the nearby single-family homes,
multi-family residents, and the nearby industrial employees.
The Westside Master Plan emphasizes the need to "maximize use of property”.
Allowing property owners at the identified community nodes to take full advantage of
their properties to add density and commercial intensity to the area will be the best use
for the property and its community. A certain percentage of residential development
should be required for developments over a certain size, and the density benchmarks
should be between 25 to 50 dwelling units per acre. Developers should be encouraged
to aim for three to four stories in height, provided appropriate buffering and landscaping
can make the new development compatible with any surrounding single-family
development.
List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area.
1 - The other three corners at the intersection of Redwood Road and Indiana Ave. are
currently zoned for commercial use. The northwest and southwest corners are already
commercial buildings, and the large property adjacent to the property at the southeast
corner is also a commercial building, meaning that it would not be ideal to build two
single-family homes at the intersection.
2 - The intersection of Redwood Road and Indiana Ave. is one of the entrances to
downtown, so it needs to have an aesthetically-pleasing building to welcome people
downtown instead of two simple single-family homes.
3 - Multi-family dwelling units may require less land than a single-family home.
My proposal to rezone the properties will create a new look at the Redwood
Road at Indiana Avenue Community Node and also contribute a part to making the
Community Node more attractive to the community and also support the designations of
the Westside Master Plan’s expectations. Because of the reasons stated, my proposal
to rezone my properties will benefit the Community Node and its residents.
LEVEL 1 FLOOR
PLAN
LEVEL 2 ( T.O.
CMU WALL)
LEVEL 3 T.O.
FLOOR JOIST
STUCCO MORNING
MIST # 751 CLASSIC
FINISH BY BASF-
SENERGY
STUCCO MORNING MIST
# 751 CLASSIC FINISH BY
BASF-SENERGY
STUCCO REVEAL
DARK GRAY
PARAPET CAP TO
MATCH WALL PANEL
STUCCO REVEAL
T.O. DECK
1
234
7
WINDOWCASEMENT/FIX
WINDOW
DECORATIVE
VERTICAL
ALUMINUM BARS
STUCCO BAND
HARRIER # 3094
CLASSIC FINISH BY
BASF-SENERGY
STUCCO BAND
HARRIER # 3094
CLASSIC FINISH BY
BASF-SENERGY
CORRUGATED DARK
GRAY METAL PANEL
SELECT BY OWNER
5
2
6655
7
22
7 733 3
3336
7 7
3
2
3 3
T.O. FRAME
WINDOW EYEBROW,
TYP.
WINDOW
LEVEL 1 FLOOR
PLAN
100' -0"
LEVEL 2 ( T.O.
CMU WALL)
108' -8"
LEVEL 3 T.O.
FLOOR JOIST
119' -0"
CASEMENT/FIX
WINDOW
T.O. DECK
128' -11 1/2"
1 2 3 4
DECK COVERGLASS OVER
ALUMINUM
CANOPY
GLASS OVER
ALUMINUM CANOPY
CORRUGATED DARK
GRAY METAL PANEL
SELECT BY OWNER
LIGHT FIXTURE
DECORATIVE
VERTICAL ALUMINUM
BARS
LIGHT FIXTURE, TYP.
AC UNIT, TYP.
GUARDRAIL
1
111
1 1
111
4
A603
3
TYP.
T.O. FRAME
129'-11"
STUCCO MORNING MIST #
751 CLASSIC FINISH BY
BASF-SENERGY
STUCCO MORNING
MIST # 751 CLASSIC
FINISH BY BASF-
SENERGY
DARK GRAY
PARAPET CAP TO
MATCH WALL PANEL
STUCCO BAND
HARRIER # 3094
CLASSIC FINISH BY
BASF-SENERGY
STUCCO BAND HARRIER
# 3094 CLASSIC FINISH
BY BASF-SENERGY
CORRUGATED DARK
GRAY METAL PANEL
SELECT BY OWNER
4H"X8"WX16"L CMU
HONED COLOR
NATURAL, BY AMCOR
STUCCO MORNING
MIST # 751 CLASSIC
FINISH BY BASF-
SENERGY
4H"X8"WX16"L CMU
HONED COLOR
NATURAL, BY AMCOR
OR CONCRETE WALL
GLASS OVER
ALUMINUM CANOPY
3/16" = 1'-0"1
3/16" = 1'-0"2 FRONT ELEVATION (WEST)
BACK ELEVATION (EAST)
PROPOSAL 1: MIXED USE
DOOR DOORDOORSTOREFRONT STOREFRONTSTOREFRONTRETAIL 1 RETAIL 2 RETAIL 3
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPT OF PROPERTY
AT 835 S REDWOOD RD. AND 1668 INDIANA AVE.
LEVEL 1 FLOOR
PLAN
LEVEL 2 ( T.O.
CMU WALL)
LEVEL 3 T.O.
FLOOR JOIST
STUCCO MORNING
MIST # 751 CLASSIC
FINISH BY BASF-
SENERGY
DOOR WITH
SIDELIGHT
STUCCO MORNING MIST
# 751 CLASSIC FINISH BY
BASF-SENERGY
STUCCO REVEAL
DARK GRAY
PARAPET CAP TO
MATCH WALL PANEL
STUCCO REVEAL
T.O. DECK
1
234
7
WINDOW
4H"X8"WX16"L
ELBONY SPLITFACE
CMU BY AMCOR
GARAGE DOOR
COLOR DARK GRAY
DOOR WITH
SIDELIGHT
LIGHT FIXTURE,
TYP.
CASEMENT/FIX
WINDOW
DECORATIVE
VERTICAL
ALUMINUM BARS
STUCCO BAND
HARRIER # 3094
CLASSIC FINISH BY
BASF-SENERGY
STUCCO BAND
HARRIER # 3094
CLASSIC FINISH BY
BASF-SENERGY
CORRUGATED DARK
GRAY METAL PANEL
SELECT BY OWNER
5
2
6655
7
22
7 733 3
3336
7 7
3
2
3 3
4H"X8"WX16"L CMU
HONED COLOR
NATURAL, BY AMCOR
4H"X8"WX16"L CMU
HONED COLOR
NATURAL, BY AMCOR
4H"X8"WX16"L CMU
HONED COLOR
NATURAL, BY AMCOR
T.O. FRAME
WINDOW EYEBROW,
TYP.
WINDOW
GARAGE DOOR
COLOR DARK GRAY
GARAGE DOOR
COLOR DARK GRAY
4H"X8"WX16"L CMU
HONED COLOR
NATURAL, BY AMCOR
OR CONCRETE WALL
LEVEL 1 FLOOR
PLAN
LEVEL 2 ( T.O.
CMU WALL)
LEVEL 3 T.O.
FLOOR JOIST
CASEMENT/FIX
WINDOW
T.O. DECK
1 2 3 4
MAIN BREAKER
AND METER PANEL
125 AMP, TYP.
LIGHT FIXTURE,
TYP.
DECK COVERGLASS OVER
ALUMINUM
CANOPY
GLASS OVER
ALUMINUM CANOPY
CORRUGATED DARK
GRAY METAL PANEL
SELECT BY OWNER
DOOR
LIGHT FIXTURE
DECORATIVE
VERTICAL ALUMINUM
BARS
CORRUGATED DARK
GRAY METAL PANEL
SELECT BY OWNER
4H"X8"WX16"L CMU
HONED COLOR
NATURAL, BY AMCOR
4H"X8"WX16"L CMU
HONED COLOR
NATURAL, BY AMCOR
LIGHT FIXTURE, TYP.
AC UNIT, TYP.
GAS METER,
TYP.
AC UNIT, TYP.
GUARDRAIL
1
111
1 1
111
4
A603
3
TYP.
T.O. FRAME
129'-11"
STUCCO MORNING MIST #
751 CLASSIC FINISH BY
BASF-SENERGY
STUCCO MORNING
MIST # 751 CLASSIC
FINISH BY BASF-
SENERGY
DARK GRAY
PARAPET CAP TO
MATCH WALL PANEL
STUCCO BAND
HARRIER # 3094
CLASSIC FINISH BY
BASF-SENERGY
STUCCO BAND HARRIER
# 3094 CLASSIC FINISH
BY BASF-SENERGY
CORRUGATED DARK
GRAY METAL PANEL
SELECT BY OWNER
4H"X8"WX16"L CMU
HONED COLOR
NATURAL, BY AMCOR
STUCCO MORNING
MIST # 751 CLASSIC
FINISH BY BASF-
SENERGY
4H"X8"WX16"L CMU
HONED COLOR
NATURAL, BY AMCOR
OR CONCRETE WALL
CORRUGATED DARK
GRAY METAL PANEL
SELECT BY OWNER
GLASS OVER
ALUMINUM CANOPY
3/16" = 1'-0"1
3/16" = 1'-0"2 FRONT ELEVATION (WEST)
BACK ELEVATION (EAST)
PROPOSAL 2: TOWNHOMES
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPT OF PROPERTY
AT 835 S REDWOOD RD. AND 1668 INDIANA AVE.
4. Mailing List
OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIPVU LINH CAO 1785 MAPLE HILLS DR. BOUNTIFULUT 84010RUSTED SPUR LLC 1717 S REDWOOD RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104SILVER ANTLER, LLC 1717 S REDWOOD RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104BKR HOLDINGS, LLC5845 CRESTRIDGE ROAD BILLINGS MT 59101GARY D TAYLOR 1676 W 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104THANH V TRAN TRUST 08/21/2017; HUONG T.M. LE TR 2852 W MATTERHORN DR TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129MARGARET VALERIO 1660 W 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104GUSTAVO CARRILLO; MELITZA MEJIA CENTENO 1652 W 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104BLAKE A BACKUS; JERALD J THOMPSON (JT) 1644 W 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104ROGELIO RODRIGUEZ 1675 W 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104THANH V TRAN TRUST 08/21/2017; HUONG T.M. LE TR 2852 W MATTERHORN DR TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129KENT V LIVINGSTON 1659 W 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104RANDY L BINGHAM; SERENA L BINGHAM 1651 W 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104RENE LEYVA 1643 W 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104RICHARD W YOUNG 1635 W 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104BRANDON PERRY 1656 W INDIANA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104BLUEMOUNTAIN INC 2441 S 1560 W WOODS CROSS UT 84087ANTONIO A FUENTES; MARIA R FUENTES (JT) 1644 W INDIANA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104MIKE NIELSON; KELLY E NIELSON (JT) 1638 W INDIANA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104KHIEM T TRAN; YEN TRAN (JT) 5830 S STONE BLUFF WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84118D. AMY WILLIAMS 1657 W INDIANA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104D E WILLIAMS 1651 W INDIANA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104JAMES A LEROY; LISA M LEROY (JT) 1647 W INDIANA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104MARY ROBERTS 1639 W INDIANA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104HASIB ODOBASIC 6308 S TIMPANOGOS WY TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129APPLIED INSTALLATION AND ERECTION INC 875 S REDWOOD RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PO BOX 148420 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114Current Occupant 836 S REDWOOD RD Salt Lake City UT 84104Current Occupant 762 S REDWOOD RD Salt Lake City UT 84104Current Occupant 1720 W INDIANA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104Current Occupant 850 S REDWOOD RD Salt Lake City UT 84104Current Occupant 1668 W 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84104Current Occupant 811 S REDWOOD RD Salt Lake City UT 84104Current Occupant 1667 W 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84104Current Occupant 1648 W INDIANA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104Current Occupant 835 S REDWOOD RD Salt Lake City UT 84104Current Occupant 1668 W INDIANA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104Current Occupant 1633 W INDIANA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104Salt Lake City Planning ‐ David GellnerPO BOX 145480 Salt Lake City UT 84114
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE: November 16, 2021
RE:Text Amendment: Amend FB-SE to allow for
rooftop commercial uses above the second
story.
PLNPCM2021-00431
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: November 16, 2021
Set Date: November 16, 2021
Public Hearing: Dec 7, 2021
Potential Action: Dec 7 or 14
2021
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the FB-SE (Form Based Special
Purpose Corridor Edge Subdistrict) zoning district to allow for rooftop commercial uses above the second
story, subject to meeting a height of 30-feet. All properties, citywide, in the FB-SE zoning district would be
impacted, although the FB-SE is primarily located within the Sugar House Community.
Current regulations only limit commercial uses above the second story, and the proposed text amendment
simply addresses those commercial rooftop uses above the second story, still capping the height at 30 feet
for commercial uses. If someone in the FB-SE zone wants to build a one-story restaurant with rooftop
dining, that is currently permitted.
The applicant has an existing two-story building that he intends to use as a restaurant, which is a
permitted use in the FB-SE zone. The applicant would like the ability to add outdoor dining on
the rooftop above the second story.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 25, 2021 and voted 5-1 to forward a positive
recommendation to the City Council.
Page | 2
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Pages 3-6 of the Planning Commission staff report includes a discussion about the key issues
identified by Planning Staff. A short summary of those is provided below. See the planning
commission staff report to view the full analysis.
1. Compliance with Master Plan Policies
Planning staff found the proposal is consistent with policies outlined in Plan Salt
Lake and would help support small businesses and provide vibrant, mixed-use
development.
2. Conditional Use for Rooftop Uses
The Sugar House Land Use Committee requested rooftop uses be a conditional use.
Planning staff reviewed the request and determined it was not appropriate because
that change would be beyond the scope of the petition, any impacts from rooftop
uses would be negligible and the use is generally compatible with the zoning
district.
3. Impacts of the Proposed Text Amendment
Staff found that the proposed amendment for rooftop uses above the second story
does not have more of an impact than a rooftop commercial use above the first
story.
4. Height Exceptions
Some members of the public suggested including height exceptions for some
rooftop structures like pergolas, sound walls, and elevator/stair bulkheads.
Planning staff feels a two-story building with a pergola, sound wall, elevator
bulkhead, or other similar structure on the rooftop area will likely still be under the
30 FT height requirement, so an exception is not necessary.
Policy Questions
The Council may wish to review where these zones abut single family structures, and discuss
whether a conditional use would be helpful at a minimum so that notice is provided when a
development is under consideration?
PUBLIC PROCESS
The public process is outlined on page two of the transmittal letter. It met the standard requirements
of noticing surrounding property owners, informing the Community Council and a public hearing at
the Planning Commission.
Page | 3
Properties Zoned FB-SE
Page 5, Planning Commission Staff Report
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT
•Land use tables for the FB-SE zone are not changing with this proposal –
permitted and conditional uses will remain the same
The FB-SE zoning regulations currently limit commercial uses to the first two stories
and a height of 30 feet. The proposed text amendment would allow for rooftop
commercial uses above the two-story limitation subject to meeting the 30-foot
height requirement.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: FB-SE 2nd Story Rooftop Commercial Uses, Petition PLNPCM2021-00431
STAFF CONTACT: Amy Thompson, Planning Manager, amy.thompson@slcgov.com, 385-226-9001
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council amend the text of the zoning ordinance as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
BUDGET IMPACT: None.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
This petition was submitted by Bill Grodnik, the owner of the property at 2166 S 900 East which is
located in the FB-SE zoning district. The FB-SE zoning regulations currently limit commercial uses to
the first two stories and a height of 30 feet. The proposed text amendment would allow for rooftop
commercial uses above the two-story limitation subject to meeting the 30-foot height requirement.
The proposed zoning text amendment impacts the FB-SE zoning district citywide.
A rooftop use above the second story is not considered an additional story, but it is considered
above the two-story limitation and the proposed text amendment is seeking to address that. The
proposal does not change the land use table – existing permitted and conditional uses for the FB-SE
zone will remain the same.
Under the current FB-SE building form regulations, a commercial use is permitted or conditional
(depending on the use) above the first story. The current regulations only limit commercial uses
above the second story, and the proposed text amendment simply addresses those commercial
October 18, 2021
Lisa Shaffer (Oct 20, 2021 15:02 MDT)
10/20/2021
10/20/2021
rooftop uses above the second story, still capping the height at 30 feet for commercial uses. If
someone in the FB-SE zone wants to build a one-story restaurant with rooftop dining, that is
currently permitted.
The applicant has an existing two-story building that he intends to use as a restaurant, which is a
permitted use in the FB-SE zone. The applicant would like the ability to add outdoor dining on
the rooftop above the second story. Because the FB-SE zoning regulations limit commercial uses
to the first two stories, he submitted an application for a text amendment that would allow him to
utilize the rooftop above the second story for additional outdoor seating. Although the applicant
is applying for these changes because of plans for his specific building, the proposed changes
would impact all properties zoned FB-SE, and not just his specific property.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
•Community Council: Notice of the proposal was sent to the Sugar House and Liberty
Wells Community Council Chairs on May 26, 2021. The Sugar House Land Use
Committee requested a presentation of this item at their June 21, 2021 meeting. Both
planning staff and the applicant were in attendance. The Sugar House Community Council
submitted a letter regarding the proposal. The letter is included in the Planning Commission
Staff Report.
•Early Notification: On June 3, 2021, early notification of the project was provided to all
property owners and residents with property currently zoned FB-SE. Early notification was
also provided to all property owners and residents within 300 FT of FB-SE zoned property.
•Public Open House: The Planning Division hosted an online Open House to solicit public
comments on the proposal. The Online Open House comment period started on June 14,
2021 and ended on July 10, 2021.
•Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on
August 25, 2021. Notice of the hearing was sent to all registered recognized organization,
was posted on the Planning Commission agenda page, the State of Utah Public Notice page,
and was emailed to the Planning Division email list. The Planning Commission voted 5-1
to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
PC Agenda for August 25, 2021 (Click to Access)
PC Minutes of August 25, 2021 (Click to Access)
PC Staff Report for August 25, 2021 (Click to Access Staff Report)
EXHIBITS
1. Chronology
2.Notice of City Council Hearing
3.Petition Application
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 1
No. _____ of 2021 2
3
(An ordinance amending Section 21A.27.040 to allow for commercial uses on rooftops which 4
exceed 2 stories in the FB-SE Zoning District) 5
6
An ordinance amending sections of 21A.27.040 of the Salt Lake City Code to allow for 7
commercial uses on rooftops which exceed 2 stories in the FB-SE Zoning District pursuant to 8
Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00431. 9
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held a 10
public hearing on August 25, 2021 to consider a petition number PLNPCM2021-00431 (the 11
“petition”) initiated by Bill Grodnik, owner of property at approximately 2166 South 900 East Street, 12
to amend the Salt Lake City Code to more allow for commercial and nonresidential uses on rooftops 13
which exceed 2 stories; and 14
WHEREAS, at its August 25, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission voted in favor of 15
forwarding a positive recommendation of approval to the Salt Lake City Council (the “City 16
Council”) to adopt changes to the Salt Lake City Code as requested in the petition; and 17
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to modify its land use regulations as 18
provided herein; and 19
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds, after holding a public hearing on this 20
matter, that adopting this ordinance promotes the health, safety, and public welfare of the 21
citizens of the City. 22
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 23
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.27.040.D. That Section 24
21A.27.040.D of the Salt Lake City Code (FB-SE Building Form Standards) shall be and hereby is 25
amended as follows: 26
D. FB-SE Building Form Standards: Building form standards are listed in table 21A.27.040.D of 27
this section. 28
29
Table 21A.27.040.D FB-SE BUILDING FORM STANDARDS 30
Permitted Building Forms
Cottage, Row House, Multi-Family And Storefront
H Maximum building height Maximum building height in
the FB-SE is 45 ft.
Limitation on commercial uses Commercial or nonresidential
uses are limited to the first 2
stories and a height of 30 ft.
Commercial and nonresidential
rooftop uses are allowed above
the second story subject to
meeting the 30 ft. height
requirement.
F Front
and
corner
side
yard
setback
Greenway Minimum of 5 ft. Maximum of
15 ft.
Neighborhood Minimum of 15 ft. Maximum of
25 ft.
Avenue Minimum of 5 ft. Maximum of
10 ft.
Boulevard Minimum of 15 ft. Maximum of
25 ft.
B Required build-to Minimum of 50% of street
facing facade shall be built to
the minimum setback line.
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
S Interior side yard When adjacent to a residential
district, a minimum setback of
25% of the lot width, up to 25
ft., is required. Any portion of
the building taller than 30 ft.
must be stepped back 2 ft. from
the required building setback
line for every 1 ft. of height over
30 ft. When adjacent to other
zoning districts, no minimum
setback is required. See
illustration below.
R Rear yard When adjacent to a residential
district, a minimum setback of
25% of the lot width, up to 25
ft., is required. Any portion of
the building taller than 30 ft.
must be stepped back 2 ft. from
the required building setback
line for every 1 ft. of height over
30 ft. When adjacent to other
zoning districts, no minimum
setback is required. See
illustration below.
L Minimum lot size 4,000 sq. ft.; not to be used to
calculate density.
W Minimum lot width 50 ft.
DU Dwelling units per building
form
No minimum or maximum.
BF Number of building forms per
lot
1 building form permitted for
every 4,000 sq. ft. of lot area
provided all building forms
have frontage on a street.
31
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance take effect immediately after it has been 32
published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code 33
§10-3-713. 34
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of 35
______________, 2021. 36
______________________________ 37
CHAIRPERSON 38
39
ATTEST: 40
41
______________________________ 42
CITY RECORDER 43
44
45
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 46
47
48
Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 49
50
51
______________________________ 52
MAYOR 53
54
______________________________ 55
CITY RECORDER 56
57
(SEAL) 58
59
Bill No. ________ of 2021. 60
Published: ______________. 61
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: _________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Hannah Vickery, Senior City Attorney
By: ___________________________________
Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney
10/7/21
1) CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2021-00431
April 29, 2021 Bill Grodnik submitted an application for a Zoning Text
Amendment.
May 18, 2021 Petition PLNPCM2021-00431was assigned to Amy Thompson,
Senior Planner, for staff analysis and processing.
May 26, 2021 Notice sent to Recognized Community Organizations informing
them of the petition. Early notification of the project was also sent
to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the proposal.
June 3, 2020 Early Notification of the project was sent to property owners and
residents with FB-SE zoned parcels as wells as property owners
and residents within 300 FT of FB-SE zoned parcels.
June 14, 2021 The Planning Division held an online open house to solicit
comments on the proposal. The open house commenting period
was open from June 14, 2021 – July 10, 2021.
June 21, 2021 The proposal was presented at the Sugar House Land Use
Committee Meeting. The applicant and planning staff were both in
attendance to answer questions about the proposal.
August 11, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing notices emailed to interested
parties and residents/property owners who requested notice.
Agenda posted to the Planning Commission website and the State
of Utah Public Notice webpage.
August 19, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report posted.
August 25, 2021 Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a positive
recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed text
amendment.
2) NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2021-00431 – A request by Bill
Grodnik, owner of the property at approximately 2166 S 900 East, for a zoning text amendment
that would impact all properties in the FB-SE (Form Based Special Purpose Corridor Edge
Subdistrict) citywide. The FB-SE zone currently limits commercial or nonresidential uses to
first two stories and a height of 30 feet. The proposed text amendment would allow for rooftop
commercial uses above the second story, subject to meeting a height of 30-feet. The proposed
amendment affects section 21A.27.040.D FB-SE Building Form Standards. Related provisions of
Title 21A Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition. Information on this proposal can
be found in the staff report prepared for the Planning Commission accessible from this link -
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/08.August/Final%20Staff%20
Report%20-%20FB-SE%20Rooftop%20Text%20Amendment.pdf
As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive
comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider
adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE: Date #1 and Date #2
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: **This meeting will not have a physical location.
**This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation. If you are interested in participating in the Public Hearing, please visit our
website at https://www.slc.gov/council/ to learn how you can share your comments during
the meeting. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at
(801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments
received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Amy Thompson at 385-226-9001 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday or via e-mail at amy.thompson@slcgov.com
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours
in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days
in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.
3) PETITION APPLICATION
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:November 16, 2021
RE: Bueno Avenue Apartments Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendment
at Approximately 129 South 700 East
PLNPCM2021-00047 & PLNPCM2021-00048
The Council will be briefed about an ordinance that would amend zoning of the properties at 724, 728, 732,
738, 744, 750 and 754 East Bueno Avenue from SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential District) to
RMF-45 (Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District). The applicant is also proposing to
consolidate these and parcels at 129 South 700 East, and 758 East Bueno Avenue already zoned RMF-45
into one parcel. Additionally, the proposal would amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land
Use Map for the properties from Medium-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential.
The property is on the block interior bordered by 100 and 200 South and between 700 and 800 East as
shown in the image below. The applicant proposes constructing a 4-story apartment building with 65 1–4-
bedroom apartments (192 bedrooms total). Each bedroom would be leased individually and have a private
bathroom. Kitchen and living room spaces in each apartment would be shared among residents within the
unit. 72 on-site parking spaces are included in the proposal. A single-story amenity and leasing building
fronting on 700 East is also proposed as part of the development.
According to the applicant’s proposal, “This development provides attainably priced housing with a
bedroom rental to be at or near the 60% AMI Rent restriction level. This is achieved without the
requirement of city, state, or federal funding, or any other type of public incentive.”
Under the proposed development a six-unit multi-family building and seven single-family homes on the
private, unpaved road would be removed. The homes are reportedly in poor condition as shown in the
Housing Condition Report found on pages 141-183 of the Planning Commission staff report. The applicant
states it is economically unfeasible to rehabilitate the homes.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: November 16, 2021
Set Date: November 16, 2021
Public Hearing: December 7, 2021
Potential Action: December 14, 2021
Page | 2
It should be noted the applicant stated in their application the homes will be removed regardless of the
outcome of the master plan and zoning map amendments. If the proposed amendments are not approved,
the applicant’s expressed plans are to construct luxury for sale townhomes on the site which would be
allowed “by right” under current zoning.
These proposed master plan and zoning map amendments were reviewed at the June 23, 2021 Planning
Commission meeting and a public hearing was held. Several people spoke or had their comments read
during the hearing. Most expressed opposition to the proposal. The Planning Commission voted to table
planned development and conditional use applications associated with this proposal and may review them
at a future date depending on the City Council’s decision on the master plan and zoning map amendments.
The Council’s role is to determine if the proposed master plan amendment and rezone are appropriate for
the interior block parcels.
On June 23 the Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation to the Council on the
proposed master plan and zoning map amendments. However, that vote was recalled at the July 14
Planning Commission meeting when it was discovered a housing mitigation loss report was not presented
to the Planning Commission.
Acco0rding to the Housing Mitigation ordinance, “any petition for a zoning change that would permit a
nonresidential use of land, that includes within its boundaries residential dwelling units, may not be
approved until a housing mitigation plan is approved by the city.” (18.97.020.A) Because existing use of the
property is residential and the proposed RMF-45 zoning district would allow nonresidential land uses, the
proposed amendment is subject to the housing loss mitigation process. The report found the petition
amending zoning for the subject parcels from SR-3 to RMF-45 would replace lost housing stock. It further
found replacement costs exceed market value of the existing homes, so no mitigation fee is required. The
Community and Neighborhoods Director signed the report associated with this proposal.
This proposal was reviewed again at the September 8, 2021 Planning Commission meeting and a housing
mitigation report was presented. A second public hearing on the proposal was held and more than 20
people spoke or provided written comments with the majority expressing opposition. Planning staff
recommended the Commission forward a positive recommendation to the City Council.
The Commission voted 3-2 to forward a negative recommendation on the master plan and zoning map
amendments. Commissioners who voted to forward a negative recommendation stated the proposed
rezone was not compatible with the master plan and neighborhood context. A desire for lower density
development in the area was also expressed. Commissioners who voted in support of forwarding a positive
recommendation to the City Council did not comment.
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments, determine if the
Council supports moving forward with the proposal.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. The Council may wish to discuss how impacts such as additional residents and traffic in this area
would be managed.
2. The Council may wish to ask what the minimum lease period is. Will it be less than six months?
3. Does each bedroom accommodate only one individual?
a. If so, how will this be monitored and enforced?
Page | 3
b. Is that permitted under the Fair Housing Act?
4. The Council may wish to discuss how and if this project helps address housing demands and needs
of the city and neighborhood
5. This type of project is raising concerns about the loss of naturally occurring affordable housing in
favor of newer, market rate units.
a. The Council may wish to ask the administration for a status report on updates to the
housing loss mitigation plan.
6. The dense nature of this project raised questions about traffic flow in and out of the property as
there is only one entrance/exit. Was this addressed by the Administration?
7. Did the Administration discuss potential parking issues with the proposed development given the
lack of on-street parking in the area? Are the 72 on-site parking spaces adequate to serve 192
residents of the development plus visitors?
Proposed Bueno Avenue Apartments Site Plan
Page | 4
Vicinity zoning map with subject project area outlined in yellow.
Parcels proposed to be rezoned from SR-3 to RMF-45 outlined in red.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Planning staff identified three key issues with this proposal. They are summarized below. Please see pages
11-13 for full details.
Issue 1-Zoning and Master Plan Amendment
There are separate planned development and conditional use applications associated with this proposal.
They are dependent on the zoning and master plan amendments being approved and will be considered by
the Planning Commission later if the zoning and master plan amendments are approved.
As stated above, if the zoning and master plan amendments are not approved development on the site
under existing zoning designations could result in development of luxury townhomes and a loss of
affordable housing stock.
Issue 2-Housing Mitigation
As noted above, a housing loss mitigation report was reviewed by the Administration and the Community
and Neighborhoods Director approved the report. No housing loss mitigation fee is required.
Issue 3-Rooming House/Co-Living - Innovative Housing Development
An objective of the Growing SLC Housing Plan is to “lead in the construction of innovative housing
solutions.” Rooming houses/co-living buildings are new to Salt Lake City, but, according to Planning staff,
is popular in many metro areas. (The Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance uses the term “rooming (boarding)
house.” Co-living is an updated term and used by the applicant.)
Page | 5
Development of co-living communities is largely in response to rising housing costs and need for more
affordable housing options. Co-living is often targeted toward 25- to 35-year-olds who are entering the
workforce and priced out of the market but is not limited to this age range.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The table below compares building height and yard requirements for the SR-3 zoning designation with
RMF-45 zoning.
SR-3 RMF-45
Maximum Building Height The maximum height of buildings
with pitched roofs shall be:
a. Twenty-eight feet (28')
measured to the ridge of the roof;
or
b. The average height of
other principal buildings on the
block face.
2. The maximum height of a
flat roof building shall be twenty
feet (20').
The maximum building height
permitted in this district is forty
five feet (45').
General Yard Requirements Minimum Yard Requirements:
1. Front Yard: The minimum
depth of the front yard for all
principal buildings shall be equal to
the average of the front yards of
existing buildings within the block
face. Where there are no existing
buildings within the block face, the
minimum depth shall be ten feet
(10'). Where the minimum front
yard is specified in the recorded
subdivision plat, the requirement
specified on the plat shall prevail.
For buildings legally existing on
April 12, 1995, the required front
yard shall be no greater than the
established setback line of the
existing building.
2. Corner Side Yard: Ten feet
(10'). For buildings legally existing
on April 12, 1995, the required
corner side yard shall be no greater
than the established setback line of
the existing building.
3. Interior Side Yard:
a. Single-family detached
dwellings: Four feet (4').
b. Single-family attached and
twin home dwellings: When
abutting a single-family dwelling, a
four foot (4') yard is required,
otherwise no interior yard is
required. Where a yard is provided,
it shall be not less than four feet
(4').
Minimum Yard Requirements:
1. Front Yard: Twenty percent
(20%) of lot depth, but need not
exceed twenty five feet (25'). For
buildings legally existing on April
12, 1995, the required front yard
shall be no greater than the existing
yard.
2. Corner Side Yard:
a. Single-family attached
dwellings: Ten feet (10').
b. Multi-family dwellings:
Twenty feet (20').
c. All other permitted and
conditional uses: Twenty feet (20').
3. Interior Side Yard:
a. Single-family attached
dwelling: No yard is required,
however if one is provided it shall
not be less than four feet (4').
b. Multi-family dwellings:
The minimum yard shall be eight
feet (8'); provided, that no
principal building is erected within
ten feet (10') of a building on an
adjacent lot.
c. All other permitted and
conditional uses: Ten feet (10') on
each side.
4. Rear Yard: The rear yard
shall be twenty five percent (25%)
of the lot depth, but need not
exceed thirty feet (30').
Page | 6
4. Rear Yard: Twenty percent
(20%) of the lot depth but not less
than fifteen feet (15') and need not
exceed thirty feet (30').
MASTER PLAN CONSIDERATIONS
Planning staff identified master plan considerations applicable to the proposed master plan and zoning
map amendments which are summarized below. Please see pages 91-92 of the staff report for additional
information.
Growing SLC: A Five-Year Housing Plan 2018-2022
A goal to increase housing options is included in Growing SLC. The following objectives are listed:
Objective 1: Review and modify land-use and zoning regulations to reflect the affordability needs of
a growing, pioneering city.
Objective 2: Remove impediments in City processes to encourage housing development.
Objective 3: Lead in the construction of innovative housing solutions.
Plan Salt Lake (2015)
Plan Salt Lake, the citywide master plan includes policies related to providing additional housing options.
Policies related to the proposed project include growth, housing, and air quality. Planning staff identified
several objectives of these policies that align with the proposal such as:
Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land.
Increase diversity of housing types for all income levels throughout the city.
Enable moderate density increases within existing neighborhoods where appropriate.
Promote high density residential in areas served by transit.
Minimize impact of car emissions.
Central Community Master Plan (2005)
The subject properties are in the Bryant neighborhood and within the Central Community Master Plan
area. The associated Future Land Use Map designates the SR-3 zoned parcels as “medium-density
residential” and the RMF-45 parcels as “medium-high density residential.” Planning staff stated the
medium-density residential designation is due to the block’s interior and existing lower density housing.
Planning staff listed several residential land use goals and policies along with residential new construction
policies in the Master Plan including:
Reduce excessive density potential, stabilize the neighborhood, and conserve the neighborhood’s
residential character.
Ensure new multi-family development is carefully sited, well designed, and compatible in scale.
Provide more affordable housing (owner occupied and rental).
Based on the Future Land Use map use residential zoning to establish and maintain a variety of
housing opportunities that meet social needs and income levels of a diverse population.
Promote construction of a variety of housing options that are compatible with the character of the
neighborhoods of the Central Community.
Planning staff stated “Further development on this site under the current zoning and master plan
designation could result in the removal of affordable housing stock, to be replaced by very high-priced
housing. This would be counterproductive to the growing need of increasing attainably priced housing
stock in the area.
Page | 7
The requested master plan amendment would promote the redevelopment of this site and would help meet
City growth and housing goals.”
ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
Attachment I (pages 95-97) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment
standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. Planning staff found the
proposed amendment complies with all applicable standards, provided the Master Plan future land use
map is amended. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for full details.
PUBLIC PROCESS
• March 1, 2021-Notice of the project and request for comments sent to East Central Community
Council and Central City Neighborhood Council chairs. The East Central Community Council
Chair submitted a letter to Planning staff expressing opposition to the proposal.
• March 26, 2021-Early notification sent to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the
project area.
• April 5, 2021-Project included in Planning Division online open house.
• June 23, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing. The Commission tabled associated planned
development and conditional use items until a City Council vote on the Master Plan and zoning
map amendments. The Commission voted 4-3 to forward a positive recommendation to the City
Council.
• July 14, 2021-Planning Commission recalled vote from June 23, 2o21 meeting because a housing
mitigation report was not considered prior to making recommendation to the City Council.
• September 8, 2021-Planning Commission was presented a housing mitigation report. A second
public hearing was held, and the Commission voted 3-2 to forward a negative recommendation to
the City Council for the proposed Master Plan and zoning map amendments.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Date Received:
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council:
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: Bueno Apartments @ 724, 728, 732, 738, 744, 750 and 754 East Bueno Avenue -
Zoning Map Amendment (PLNPCM2021-00048) from SR-3 to RMF-45 and Master Plan
Amendment (PLNPCM2021-00047)
STAFF CONTACT: Katia Pace, Principal Planner, katia.pace@slcgov.com, 385-226-8499
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
•Planning Staff recommended approval.
•On June 23, 2021 the Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation
to the City Council.
•On July 14, 2021 the Planning Commission recalled the vote from the June 23, 2021
meeting because the Planning Commission is required to consider a housing mitigation
report for zoning amendments prior to making a recommendation to the City Council.
•On September 8, 2021 the Planning Commission held a second public hearing and voted
to forward a negative recommendation to the City Council.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Kevin Perry, representing the property owner, is requesting approval for a master plan and
zoning map amendment to accommodate the Bueno Avenue Apartments, a Rooming (boarding)
House. The location would be at approximately 129 S 700 East and 758 East Bueno Avenue
October 18, 2021
Lisa Shaffer (Oct 19, 2021 15:58 MDT)
10/19/2021
10/19/2021
(already RMF-45 parcels), together with the properties at 724, 728, 732, 738, 744, 750 and 754
East Bueno Avenue to be rezoned.
Area in red shows the parcels that would be rezoned from SR-3 to RMF-45 and have the master
plan designation changed from Medium Density to Medium Hight Density. Area in blue is the
remainder area for the project that is zoned RMF-45.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 23, 2021. The commission voted to
table the Planned Development and Conditional Use and voted 4-2 to forward a positive
recommendation for the master plan and zoning map amendment to the City Council.
The vote from the June 23rd meeting was recalled at the following Planning Commission
meeting, on July 14, 2021, because according to Salt Lake City Code Section 18.97, Mitigation
of Residential Housing Loss, the Planning Commission is required to consider a housing loss
mitigation report for the zoning amendment prior to making a recommendation to the City
Council and the report was not presented to the Planning Commission before the vote on the
June 23rd meeting.
On September 8, 2021, the Planning Commission held a second public hearing and reviewed the
housing loss mitigation report. The report was approved and signed by the Department of
Community and Neighborhoods director prior to being presented to the Planning Commission.
The commission voted to recommend denial to the City Council for the following applications:
a. Zoning Map Amendment – To rezone 7 parcels on the site from SR-3 to RMF-45.
b. Master Plan Map Amendment - To amend the Central Community Master Plan future
land use map from "Medium Density Residential" to "Medium High Density Residential"
Proposed Project
The final project proposes to consolidate 10 parcels and replace the existing structures with two
buildings: a single-story amenity building fronting 700 East and a 4-story rooming house on the
interior of the site. The rooming house would consist of 65 units ranging from 1 bedroom to 4-
bedroom units. Each unit would share cooking and living room facilities and would have a
bathroom for each bedroom. The total site is approximately 1.55 acres or 67,518 square feet.
The breakdown of the 65 units would be:
1 Bed – 4 units (1 x 4 = 4)
2 Bed – 24 units (2 x 24 = 48)
3 Bed – 8 units (3 x 8 = 24)
4 Bed – 29 units (4 x 29 = 116)
Existing Conditions
Bueno Avenue is a private right-of-way, that runs across the site granting exclusive access to the
parcels on this site and to the adjacent parcel to the south. At the entrance of the site, there is an
existing multifamily building with garages/storage facilities. At the interior of the site there are
seven single family homes. Several of these homes are currently vacant and have major
structural and foundation issues, electrical code deficiencies, and plumbing problems.
The condition of Bueno Avenue on this block is in disrepair, with an unmaintained dirt roadway.
The utilities are severely outdated and require replacement.
Housing Loss Mitigation Report
The site is divided between RMF-45 and SR-3 zoning designation. Seven of the parcels with
single-family homes and a vacant parcel are zoned SR-3; the other parcels are zoned RMF-45.
The Mitigation of Residential Housing Loss ordinance (Salt Lake City Code Section 18.97)
requires that any petition for a zoning change that would permit a nonresidential use of land and
includes within its boundaries residential dwelling units, may not be approved until a housing
mitigation plan is reviewed by the city.
Because the proposed RMF-45 zoning district would allow for nonresidential land uses, the
zoning amendment is subject to the housing loss mitigation process. As required by the housing
loss mitigation ordinance, the Director of the Department of Community and Neighborhoods has
signed the report. The report found that the petition to rezone these parcels from SR-3 to RMF-
45 zone would result in replacement of housing stock that allows for housing for 192 individuals.
Block showing site in yellow line and RMF-45, RMF-35, and SR-3 zoning designations
Recommendations
On June 23, 2021, the Planning Commission voted 4-2 to forward a positive recommendation for
the master plan and zoning map amendment to the City Council based on the initial staff report
and the information presented and the input received in the public hearing.
On September 8, 2021, the Planning Commission voted 3-2 to forward a negative
recommendation for denial based on the request not being compatible with the master plan and
the context of the neighborhood.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
• Notice of the project and request for comments was sent to the East Central Community
Council and the Central City Neighborhood Council on March 1, 2021. The East Central
Community Council wrote a letter with a negative recommendation based on the loss of
affordable housing. The Central City Neighborhood Council did not respond.
• Notices were mailed to property owners/residents within ~300 feet of the proposal on
March 26, 2021.
• Online Open House with information about the proposal, was published on April 5, 2021
in the Salt Lake City Planning’s website https://www.slc.gov/planning/open-houses/.
• The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 23, 2021. The commission voted
to table the Planned Development and Conditional Use and voted 4-2 to forward a positive
recommendation for the Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to the City Council.
• On July 14, 2021 the Planning Commission recalled the vote from the June 23, 2021
meeting because the Planning Commission is required to consider a housing mitigation
report for zoning amendments prior to making a recommendation to the City Council.
• On September 8, 2021 the Planning Commission held a second public hearing as decided
by the Chair and voted 3-2 to forward a negative recommendation to the City Council for
the proposed master plan and zoning map amendment.
Planning Commission Records:
a) Planning Commission Agenda of June 23, 2021 (Click to Access)
b) Planning Commission Minutes of June 23, 2021 (Click to Access)
c) Planning Commission Staff Report of June 23,2021 (Click to Access Report)
d) Planning Commission Minutes of July 14, 2021 (Click to Access)
e) Planning Commission Agenda of September 8, 2021 (Click to Access)
f) Planning Commission Minutes of September 8, 2021 (Click to Access)
g) Planning Commission Staff Report of September 8, 2021 with Housing Loss Mitigation
Report (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1. Project Chronology
2. Additional Comments (Not on Staff Report)
3. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
4. Original Petition
5. Mailing List
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2021
(Amending the zoning of properties located at 724, 728, 732, 738, 744, 750 and 754 East Bueno
Avenue from SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential District) to RMF-45
(Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District), and amending the Central
Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map for the aforementioned properties from Medium
Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 724, 728, 732,
738, 744, 750 and 754 East Bueno Avenue from SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential
District) to RMF-45 (Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District) pursuant to
Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00048 and amending the Central Community Master Plan Future
Land Use Map for the aforementioned properties from Medium Density Residential to Medium
High Density Residential pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00047.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held
a public hearing on June 23, 2021 on an application submitted by Kevin Perry representing Alta
Terra Real Estate, on behalf of- Four Square Holdings LLC, the owner of real property located at
located at 724, 728, 732, 738, 744, 750 and 754 East Bueno Avenue (the “Properties”), to rezone
the Properties from SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential District) to RMF-45
(Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District) pursuant to Petition No.
PLNPCM2021-00048, and to amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map
(the “Future Land Use Map”) with respect to the Properties from Medium Density Residential to
Medium High Density Residential pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00047;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission during their June 23, 2021 meeting voted to favor
a recommendation to approve the rezone and amendments to the Future Land Use Map pursuant
to the aforementioned petitions (the “June 23rd vote”);
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2021 during a regularly scheduled meeting the Planning
Commission recalled the June 23rd vote;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a subsequent public hearing on the
aforementioned petitions on September 8, 2021 and following the public hearing voted to
forward a recommendation to the City Council to deny the request to rezone and amend the
Future Land Use Map as requested in the aforementioned petitions;
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that
adopting this ordinance to amend the Salt Lake City zoning map to change the underlying zoning
and amend the Future Land Use Map as set forth herein is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the Properties identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be
and hereby are rezoned from SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential District) to RMF-
45 (Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District).
SECTION 2. Amending the Central Community Master Plan. The Future Land Use
Map of the Central Community Master Plan shall be and hereby is amended to change the future
land use designation of the Properties identified in Exhibit “A” from Medium Density
Residential to Medium High Density Residential.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has
been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah
Code §10-3-713.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2021.
Published: ______________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Hannah Vickery, Senior City Attorney
10/13/21
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Description of Properties to be Rezoned
and Subject to Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment:
724 East Bueno Avenue
Parcel ID No. 16-05-107-002-0000
BEG 10 RD E FR SW COR LOT 4 BLK 54 PLAT B SLC SUR E 2.5 RD N 71.25 FT W 2.5 RD S
71.25 FT TO BEG.
CONTAINS 3.049 SQUARE FEET OR 0.07 ACRE, MORE OR LESS.
728 East Bueno Avenue
Parcel ID No. 16-05-107-003-0000
BEG 12.5 RD E FR SW COR LOT 4 BLK 54 PLAT B SLC SUR E 2.5 RD N 71.25 FT W 2.5 RD
S 71.25 FT TO BEG.
CONTAINS 2,940 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0675 ACRE, MORE OR LESS.
732 East Bueno Avenue
Parcel ID No. 16-05-107-004-0000
BEG 2.5 RD W FR SE COR LOT 4 BLK 54 PLAT B SLC SUR W 2.5 RD N 71.25 FT; E 2.5
RDS; S 71.25 FT TO BEG.
CONTAINS 2,940 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0675 ACRE, MORE OR LESS.
738 East Bueno Avenue
Parcel ID No. 16-05-107-005-0000
BEG AT SE COR LOT 4 BLK 54 PLAT B SLC SUR N 5 RDS W 2.5 RDS S 5 RDS E 2.5 RDS
TO BEG.
CONTAINS 2,971 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0682 ACRE, MORE OR LESS.
744 East Bueno Avenue
Parcel ID No. 16-05-155-001-0000
BEG 248 FT W & 8.5 FT S FR NE COR LOT 7 BLK 54 PLAT B SLC SUR W 63 FT S 45^ W
14.14 FT S 31.5 FT E 73 FT M OR L TO PT DUE S FR BEG N 42 FT TO BEG.
CONTAINS 2,945 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0676 ACRE, MORE OR LESS.
750 East Bueno Avenue
Parcel ID No. 16-05-155-002-0000
BEG AT SW COR LOT 7 BLK 54 PLAT B SLC SUR E 82 FT N 7 RD W 57.25 FT S 2 RD W 1.5
RD S 5 RD TO BEG.
CONTAINS 8,725 SQUARE FEET OR 0.2003 ACRE, MORE OR LESS.
754 East Bueno Avenue
Parcel ID No. 16-05-155-003-0000
BEG 205 FT W & 8.5 FT S OF THE NE COR LOT 7, BLK 54, PLAT B, SLC SUR; W 43 FT; S
42 FT; E 43 FT; N 42 FT TO BEG, ALSO COM 82 FT E FR SW COR SD LOT 7; E 43 FT; N 7
RDS; W 43 FT; S 7 RDS TO*
CONTAINS 6,730 SQUARE FEET OR 0.1545 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petitions: PLNPCM2021-00048 & PLNPCM2021-00047
January 15, 2021 The following petitions were received by the Planning Division:
• Planned Development (PLNPCM2021-00045)
• Conditional Use (PLNPCM2021-00046)
• Zoning Map Amendment (PLNPCM2021-00048)
• Master Plan Amendment (PLNPCM2021-00047)
February 17, 2021 Petitions were assigned to Katia Pace.
March 1, 2021 Notice of the project and request for comments sent to the
Chairs of the East Central Community Council and the
Central City Neighborhood Council.
March 26, 2021 Early notification was sent to property owners and residents
within 300 feet of the project area.
April 5, 2021 Online Open House with information about the proposal,
where to get more information, and who to contact for
questions and comments.
April 14, 2021 Planning Staff emailed applicant with issue that the height
of the Rooming House building exceeded requirement.
May 24, 2021 Received new information from applicant with building
height.
June 23, 2021 Planning Commission held a public hearing. The commission
voted to table the Planned Development and Conditional Use until
the City Council decides on the Master Plan and Zoning Map
Amendment. The commission also voted 4-2 to forward a positive
recommendation to City Council.
July 14, 2021 Planning Commission recalled the vote from the June 23, 2021
meeting because the Planning Commission is required to consider
a housing mitigation report for zoning amendments prior to
making a recommendation to the City Council.
September 8, 2021 Planning Commission held a second public hearing, were
presented a Housing Loss Mitigation Report and voted 3-2 to
forward a negative recommendation to the City Council for the
proposed Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendment.
2. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
(Not on Staff Report)
From:
To:Planning Public Comments; Pace, Katia
Subject:(EXTERNAL) NO on Bueno apartments spot up-zone request!
Date:Monday, June 21, 2021 11:24:12 PM
Attachments:Comments re proposed re-zone of Bueno Avenue Apartments.docx
Salt Lake Planning Commission and Planning Staff:
Please read and consider my attached comments re the proposed up-zone
for the mid-block properties referred to as the Bueno Apartments. It
is discouraging (to put it mildly) to have to continually prod the
city to uphold its own planning documents and codes in the face of
pressure from opportunistic developers who evidently see easy money in
requesting spot up-zones in lieu of pursuing proposals on properties
already zoned for the uses they propose. The city's failures in this
regard are in part responsible for the many tracts of under-developed
and derelict properties that plague the central city and the
concurrent run-away price increases for properties in adjacent
neighborhoods. Please work with the developer in question at these
properties to devise a plan that doesn't entail tearing down existing
affordable housing and that is compatible with the stated goals of the
existing neighborhood planning documents.
Thank you for your diligent work on this matter,
Rich
Rich Wilcox
Comments re proposed re-zone of Bueno Avenue Apartments
It was disheartening to see a SLC Planning Staff report in favor of a proposal to grant a spot up-zone to a
developer who plans to tear down existing affordable housing on Bueno Avenue to built a single-room
occupancy “dorm” in this location. SRO units, if really needed, should be built in areas already zoned for
this use (in which there are many lots suitable for building or redevelopment), or as part of a university
housing project, on campus. This is not a good time to be demolishing occupied, affordable housing
units in our city. The positive report from the planning staff flies in the face of the negative
recommendation from the East Central Community Council and is in direct conflict with the Central
Community Master Plan. It also is further fuel for the bonfire of speculative investment in our
community, where the city’s willingness to grant up-zoning requests from developers is driving property
and housing costs through the roof. The city needs to encourage this type of development in areas
already zoned for these purposes by standing by its own planning and land use documents. Failure to
do so will result in the underdeveloped and blighted properties of downtown remaining in that state,
while turning the surrounding neighborhoods into a sea of cookie-cutter apartments that won’t meet
the housing needs of low- and moderate-income families.
Any developer with an imagination and a constructive vision could come up with a proposal for this
property that preserves the existing housing while adding additional units in place of the abandoned
garage structures. The city planning staff and planning council should have the ability and motivation to
push a developer lacking these characteristics into a better development plan.
Please stand by the city’s own clear planning and land use documents, and the housing needs of the
low-income residents already living on these properties, by voting “no” on the re-zoning request for
these properties on Bueno Avenue. And (an apparently needed) nudge towards a proposal that
preserves the existing affordable housing would be a helpful step.
From:Anderson, John
To:nils adey; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Pace, Katia
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Support for zoning change SR-3 to RMF-45 for Bueno Avenue
Date:Wednesday, September 8, 2021 9:00:22 AM
Nils,
Your comments are appreciated and will be shared with the Planning Commission prior to their meeting tonight. If you'd
like to participate in that meeting please follow the instructions found on the agenda:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/09.%20September/PC09.08.2021agendaAMENDED.pdf
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as
accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to
application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response to a
complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do so at
their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
-----Original Message-----
From: nils adey <nilsadey1@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 9:21 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Support for zoning change SR-3 to RMF-45 for Bueno Avenue
To whom it concerns,
I am writing to show my support for the proposed SR-3 to RMF-45 zoning change for Bueno Avenue. Salt Lake City is in
significant need for additional housing, particularly affordable housing, and this zoning change would be a step in the
right direction.
Thank you,
Nils Adey
From:Anderson, John
To:Bojan Tomic; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Pace, Katia
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Bueno Ave. Rezone
Date:Wednesday, September 8, 2021 9:00:39 AM
Bojan,
Your comments are appreciated and will be shared with the Planning Commission prior to
their meeting tonight. If you'd like to participate in that meeting please follow the
instructions found on the agenda:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/09.%20September/PC
09.08.2021agendaAMENDED.pdf
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
From: Bojan Tomic
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 10:16 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Bueno Ave. Rezone
To whom it may concern,
After reviewing the attached file, I believe this would be a worth while concept. Living in Salt
Lake City has become hard for many individuals. A concept such as Bueno Avenue Apartments could
help residents who may bot be able to afford living in the city.
Best,
Bojan Tomic
From:Mills, Wayne
To:Rankins, Marlene
Cc:Pace, Katia; Clark, Aubrey
Subject:FW: (EXTERNAL) Bueno Avenue Apartments
Date:Wednesday, September 8, 2021 9:54:36 AM
Hi Marlene-
I think your doing the meeting tonight. Please forward these comments to the PC. Thanks.
WAYNE MILLS
Planning Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7282
FAX 801-535-6174
WWW.slc.gov/planning
Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights.
From: hunter
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 8:52 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Bueno Avenue Apartments
To whom it may concern,
I'm a Park City, UT resident, but I work in Salt Lake City. I am writing to you in support of the
affordable housing option being proposed in the Bueno Avenue Apartments. As you likely know, the
proposed strategy has proven effective in other cities where affordable housing has been
challenging. Affordable housing will allow SLC's continued economic growth by providing a safe,
clean, and desirable housing option within the community to attract the best job applicants.
Allowing continued growth without providing strong living options for all economic levels will lead to
tremendous challenges in the future. Now is the time to be proactive. I strongly urge you to vote in
favor of the rezoning so that Bueno Avenue Apartments can move forward. I hope that a similar
proposal will be brought forward to the PC community too as we are in desperate need of affordable
housing.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Hunter Underhill
From:John Davis
To:Pace, Katia
Subject:(EXTERNAL) "Bueno Avenue Co-Living Apartments" Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendment
Date:Wednesday, September 8, 2021 10:03:24 AM
Master Plan Amendment (PLNPCM2021-00047)
Zoning Map Amendment (PLNPCM2021-00048)
"Bueno Avenue Co-Living Apartments" Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendment
Katia: Please ensure my comments below are received by the Planning
Commissioners. Thank you!
Dear Planning Commissioners,
I want to thank you all for the time and attention you have given thus far in
carefully considering the myriad of planning applications associated with the Bueno
Avenue development proposal. As I am sure you appreciate, this is a massively
complex proposal, touching on housing affordability issues, displacement of existing
residents, compatible neighborhood infill development, and a co-living housing type
that is relatively new to our City in this context. After considering the proposal, I
strongly encourage that you vote to forward a negative recommendation
relative to the master plan and zoning map amendment proposals.
I strongly believe that any planning proposal that directly results in (or is likely to
result in) a loss or erosion of existing housing should be denied until Salt Lake City
has targeted and effective housing loss mitigation and displacement policies in place.
The instant proposal will result in a direct loss of existing naturally occurring
affordable housing, with many current residents in the area likely unable to find new
housing within Salt Lake City. In fact, current residents have communicated to others
in the neighborhood that this redevelopment proposal will result in their displacement
and that they will likely find themselves subsequently unhoused and seeking
emergency shelter.
Housing loss mitigation and displacement policies are essential to ensure our City
grows in a way that is sensitive to existing housing-vulnerable residents. Housing
loss mitigation and displacement policies are currently in the process of being
developed and refined by the Administration, and decisionmakers including
yourselves should be extraordinarily careful in considering proposals that impact
housing in our City until these important protections are in place.
In addition, while well intended, I am not convinced that the proposed co-living space
is a true solution to addressing affordability in the way it is being marketed by the
developers, especially when defined affordably is not explicitly required and enforced
as a condition of approval. In many growing cities in the U.S., market developed co-
living spaces – either new construction or rehabilitation/conversion of existing
buildings – have not resulted in new affordable housing. Instead, many of these
market rate co-living spaces are designed and marketed as luxury co-living and/or co-
working arrangements for affluent students and young professionals. While more
affordable than normal market rate one bedroom or studio units, they are often not
the type of deeply affordable housing Salt Lake City requires. Moreover, co-living
units by their nature will often not be suitable for families and other multi-generational
households.
The vast majority of the new development in our City in the last decade has indeed
been primarily studio/1-bedroom units, and the housing needs of both families with
children and multigenerational households have been ignored by the private
development market and not fully supported by the City through effective policy. This
immediate proposal appears to be a continuation of this trend.
Thank you for your time in considering the above.
Jack Davis
From:Anderson, John
To:Stephanie Anglin; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Pace, Katia
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Vote Against The Bueno Avenue Apartments Proposal
Date:Wednesday, September 8, 2021 10:44:20 AM
Stephanie,
Your comments are appreciated and will be shared with the Planning Commission prior to
their meeting tonight. If you'd like to participate in that meeting please follow the
instructions found on the agenda:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/09.%20September/PC
09.08.2021agendaAMENDED.pdf
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
From: Stephanie Anglin
Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 10:16 AM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Vote Against The Bueno Avenue Apartments Proposal
I am asking you to vote against the proposal for the Bueno Avenue apartments.
This rezone will negatively impact the standard of living in the East Central neighborhood. The city
should not allow developers to force working-class people to share kitchens. It is becoming ever
more clear that COVID-19 isn't going away any time soon. Even without COVID-19, people still get
sick and will be forced to use a communal kitchen, threatening the safety of their neighbors. After
working all day, would you want to cook in a communal kitchen where you are elbowing your
neighbors for space to make dinner? Or would you rather have your own kitchen where you can
cook with your family, safely and without as much stress?
Furthermore, these apartments will dramatically increase rent in the area. Some micro-apartments
in the valley have increased rent by almost 30% in only one year. There are no requirements for
affordability in this proposal.
This proposal is not a solution to the housing shortage. In fact, these apartments will displace
mothers, children, and families. Frankly, this proposal is extremely disrespectful to the people in the
East Central area.
I am urging you to vote against this disrespectful and harmful proposal. You have the power to
change the course of people's lives. Why would you want to put their lives in danger by voting for a
proposal like this? Please, do the right thing.
Sincerely,
Stephanie Anglin
From:cindy cromer
To:Pace, Katia; Planning Public Comments
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Re: zoning amendments: Bueno Ave.
Date:Wednesday, September 8, 2021 2:33:19 PM
To members of the Planning Commission
From cindy cromer
comment on zoning amendments: Bueno
9/8/21 part 2
First, thank you for separating the planned development and conditional use from the
requests in front of you tonight. The bundling of the 4 requests conveyed that the project was
a done deal to tenants, property owners, and business people on the block. Your vote in favor
of the rezoning led some tenants to move soon after your vote. Never doubt that what you
do and say makes a difference in people's lives.
Secondly, the most important thing I learned from Izzy Wagner was the concept of "sweating
the land." That is what this proposal does....It pushes the land beyond its carrying capacity, if
you can think of a parallel between people and livestock.
In previous messages, I have emphasized the development potential on this block and the
constraints imposed by the existing condominiums. The staff report emphasizes the existing
RMF-45 zoning but the reality is that the condominiums dating from the 1970's and 1990's
determine the potential for a large portion of the block. The perimeter can certainly
redevelop as RMF-45 and RMU-45 but the interior will be considerably lower based on divided
ownership.
Standard 1 for a zoning amendment: It has been the City's clear intent to protect the interior
block streets in the older portions of the City since the adoption of the SR-3 zone in 1995.
Standards 2 and 3 Without a major fire or earthquake and the proposed zoning change, the
average height on the interior of this block would continue to be that of the Watts condos.
The staff report refers to zoning, but because of the condominiums, the adjacent zoning is
irrelevant to the impact on properties which are not going to redevelop.
I suspect that you believe that proposals you addressed years ago have now been adopted by
the City Council but they haven't been. There is a log jam of ordinances in the City Council
office which are relevant to this proposal. You are being asked to support loopholes in
ordinances such as housing loss mitigation which should have been taken care of years ago.
From:JIM WELLS
To:Pace, Katia
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Comments on proposed re-zone on129 S. 700 E. Bueno boarding house
Date:Wednesday, September 8, 2021 6:54:44 PM
I oppose the re-zone for this project for 2 reasons
1. The 4 bedroom apt. described would rent for 4x $900 =$3600/month. That is an
expensive apt. especially when you have no control over who your room mates are.
2. Parking depicted appears to account for ~ 20% of the rooms. They would be making a
bad situation worse.
Thanks , Jim Wells
From:Mills, Wayne
To:Pace, Katia
Cc:Planning Public Comments
Subject:FW: (EXTERNAL) Bueno Park Apartment Project 100 S 700 E
Date:Monday, September 13, 2021 3:30:26 PM
Katia-
Please include these comments in your transmittal to the City Council.
Thanks.
WAYNE MILLS
Planning Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7282
FAX 801-535-6174
WWW.slc.gov/planning
Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights.
From: Casey Walrath <
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 3:25 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>; Council Comments
<Comments.Council@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Bueno Park Apartment Project 100 S 700 E
Regarding the Planning Commission's recent negative recommendation of the proposed Bueno Park
apartments zoning and master plan amendment on the 100 S 700 E block, I am disappointed and
angry that, in the midst of an unprecedented housing crisis caused primarily by a regional shortage
of affordable market-rate units, that a planning commissioner member would oppose an SRO project
on the grounds that she "would much rather see a lower scale of development like townhouses" on
the site.
Simply put, we need more, not less, intensive development in this city, particularly near the
downtown area, and for an appointed official whose home value, per county records, has
appreciated nearly 40% in just five years to deny an affordable market rate project on the basis of
arbitrary aesthetic preferences is deeply insulting to those of us being priced out of the city, whether
we as individuals prefer the typology or not.
I am writing this as an SLC resident to urge Planning Commission members to remember the needs
of people who are not in a position to profit from the housing shortage, and for the council to ignore
the commission's recommendation on this project and future ones like it. Thank you.
- Casey Walrath
3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2021-00048 & PLNPCM2021-
00047 - Bueno Avenue Apartments - Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendment - Kevin
Perry, representing the property owner, is requesting approval for a master plan and zoning map
amendment to accommodate a new residential development, the Bueno Avenue Apartments, at
the stated location. The project proposes to consolidate 10 parcels and replace the existing
structures with two buildings: a single-story amenity building fronting 700 East and a 4-story
rooming (boarding) house on the interior of the site. The rooming house would consist of 65
units ranging from 1 bedroom to 4-bedroom units. The total site is approximately 1.55 acres.
This project requires both a Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendment.
a. Zoning Map Amendment – The current zoning of 7 of parcels on the site is SR-3, and
zoning on 3 of the parcels is RMF-45. As part of the Zoning Amendment the Planning
Commission will review a Housing Loss Mitigation Report. The applicant is requesting
to amend the zoning map designation of the seven parcels zoned SR-3 to RMF-45. Case
number PLNPCM2021-00048
b. Master Plan Map Amendment - The associated future land use map in the Central
Community Master Plan currently designates the property as "Medium Density
Residential". The petitioner is requesting to amend the future land use map for the parcels
to be "Medium High Density Residential". Case number PLNPCM2021-00047
As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive
comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider
adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE:
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: **This meeting will not have a physical location.
**This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation. If you are interested in participating in the Public Hearing, please visit our
website at www.slccouncil.com to learn how you can share your comments during the
meeting. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-
7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through
any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Katia Pace at 385-226-8499 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday or via e-mail at katia.pace@slcgov.com
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours
in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days
in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.
4. ORIGINAL PETITION
5. MAILING LIST
150 SOUTH, LLC 2236 S BERKELEY ST SALT LAKE CUT 84109
AARON H LEIFER; NORMAN LEIFER; CAROL 150 S 800 E #I-1 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
ADELE BREEDEN 126 S 700 E SALT LAKE CUT 84102
AIRA GYLLENBOGEL 127 S 800 E # 14 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
ALLISON UCHIDA 150 S 800 E #A2 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
AMEL STOVRAG; SELMA HERCINOVIC (JT)110 S 800 E # 406 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
ANDREW STORY; JENNIFER THOMPSON (JT2593 POLI ST VENTURA CA 93003
ARNOLD LIU; STEPHANIE YI-FANG LIU (JT)PO BOX 541 SANDY UT 84091
BELINDA TRIEU 1619 E KENSINGTON AV SALT LAKE CUT 84105
BIRTOK LLC 561 KEYSTONE AVE #42 RENO NV 89503
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF S L CITY 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CUT 84111
BRAD RASMUSSEN; PAULA RASMUSSEN (J 1487 E VINEYARD CT BOUNTIFULUT 84010
BRADLEY D HARPER 150 S 800 E # D6 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
BRIAN VOGEL 110 S 800 E # 202 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
BUTTERFLY RENTAL PROPERTIES LLC 952 E AVILA CT SANDY UT 84094
C FAM TR 512 KEELSON CIR REDWOOD CA 94065
CARY A SELF; JUDY H SELF (JT)2254 E LONSDALE DR COTTONWO UT 84121
CHARLES H LIVSEY 3893 MONARCH DR BOUNTIFULUT 84010
CLARENCE R III HENRIKSEN 155 E 900 S SALT LAKE CUT 84111
CONOR MCMULLIN; PAUL & KAREN MCM 1057 E 400 S SALT LAKE CUT 84102
CRAIG P LINDSEY 446 E DOWNINGTON A SALT LAKE CUT 84115
CRAIG WALKER 1450 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CUT 84105
CREED WARDROP 150 S 800 E # H3 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
Current Occupant 77 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 717 E 100 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 40 S 800 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 680 E 100 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 682 E 100 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 684 E 100 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 688 E 100 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 114 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 118 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 122 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 144 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 154 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 130 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 136 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 113 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 125 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 129 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 732 E 100 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 736 E 100 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 740 E 100 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 742 E 100 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 750 E 100 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 760 E 100 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 116 S 800 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #200 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #201 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #202 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #203 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #205 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #206 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #300 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #301 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #302 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #303 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #304 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #305 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #306 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #307 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #402 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #403 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #404 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #405 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #406 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 110 S 800 E #407 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 135 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 724 E BUENO AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 728 E BUENO AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 732 E BUENO AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 738 E BUENO AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 145 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 149 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #A1 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #A4 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #A5 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #A6 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #A7 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #A8 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #A9 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #A10 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #A11 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #A12 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #B1 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #C1 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #C2 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #C3 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #C4 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #D1 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #D2 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #D5 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #D6 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #D10 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #E1 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #E2 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #E3 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #E4 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #E7 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #E8 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #E9 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #E10 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #E11 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #E12 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #F1 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #F2 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #G-3 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #G-4 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #G-5 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #G-6 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #G-7 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #G-8 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #G-9 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #G-10 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #H-8 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #H-9 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #I-2 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E #I-3 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 150 S 800 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 744 E BUENO AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 750 E BUENO AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 754 E BUENO AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 758 E BUENO AVE #FRO Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 758 E BUENO AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 161 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 165 S 700 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 717 E 200 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 745 E 200 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 753 E 200 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 755 E 200 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 130 S 800 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 140 S 800 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 105 S 800 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
Current Occupant 139 S 800 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 10 SALT LAKE CUT 84103
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 12 SALT LAKE CUT 84105
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 13 SALT LAKE CUT 84106
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 15 SALT LAKE CUT 84108
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 17 SALT LAKE CUT 84110
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 21 SALT LAKE CUT 84112
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 22 SALT LAKE CUT 84113
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 23 SALT LAKE CUT 84114
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 24 SALT LAKE CUT 84115
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 25 SALT LAKE CUT 84116
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 27 SALT LAKE CUT 84118
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 31 SALT LAKE CUT 84120
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 32 SALT LAKE CUT 84121
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 33 SALT LAKE CUT 84122
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 34 SALT LAKE CUT 84123
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 35 SALT LAKE CUT 84124
CURRENT OCCUPANT 127 S 800 E # 36 SALT LAKE CUT 84125
DANIEL A LOEWN PO BOX 695 CENTERVIL UT 84014
DANIEL PAINTER 150 S 800 E #E6 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
DARISA, LLC 3 E JOY DR FARMINGT UT 84025
DARREN L STIRLAND; CHIUNG-TZU WU (JT 150 S 800 E # C2 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
DARYL TUNG 1034 SUTTER ST #3 SAN FRANCCA 94109
DEXINGHUI KONG 127 S 800 E # 11 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
DIGITAL RAFT ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 901286 SANDY UT 84090
DOUGLAS BABB; SUE BABB (JT)1785 E MEADOW DOW COTTONWO UT 84121
DOUGLASS G ADAMS; DIANE S ADAMS PO BOX 95452 SOUTH JOR UT 84095
DOW D YANG; LIYAN REN (JT)2127 E AVELINE AVE SALT LAKE CUT 84109
DRS TR 2084 E HARVARD OAKS SALT LAKE CUT 84108
DSSLCE11 LLC 150 S 800 E # E11 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
DSSLCE12 LLC 150 S 800 E # E11 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
DSSLCG1 LLC 150 S 800 E #G- SALT LAKE CUT 84102
DWIGHT H BUTLER; CHARLES C BUTLER (T 702 E 100 S SALT LAKE CUT 84102
EASTGATE CONDM COMMON AREA MAST PO BOX 9243 SALT LAKE CUT 84109
ELIZABETH BENNETT 150 S 800 E # D2 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
ERIC & KARLA MASCHOFF FAMILY TRUST D 150 S 800 E # A7 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
FOURSQUARE HOLDINGS LLC 6055 S HOLLADAY BLVD HOLLADAY UT 84121
GEORGE AUN; HOLLY AUN (JT)2012 W FARM RIDGE R TAYLORSVI UT 84129
GEORGE E MULLIGAN FAMILY TRUST 03/0 147 S 700 E SALT LAKE CUT 84102
GEORGE GOLDHOFF 1504 RACE ST CINCINNAT OH 45202
GREGORY K MORRELL; SUSAN B TALLEY (JT110 S 800 E # 405 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
H FAM TRUST; ALLAN R HODGSON; MARG 1996 PADDINGTON DR PARK CITY UT 84060
HARVARD PLUMB LLC 1468 E HARVARD AVE SALT LAKE CUT 84105
HIVE 55, LLC 350 S 200 E SALT LAKE CUT 84111
HUGH BROWN; JANE BROWN (JT)150 N SNOW CANYON IVINS UT 84738
IRONWOOD PROPERTIES LC 1967 S 300 W SALT LAKE CUT 84115
JAMES L JANNEY 127 S 800 E # 20 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
JAMIE YOUNG 1952 BLUEBELL DR BOUNTIFULUT 84010
JEREMY MOORE; SAYA MOORE (JT)160 S 700 E SALT LAKE CUT 84102
JOHN C BOUZEK 407 E 300 S SALT LAKE CUT 84111
JOHN CHRISTOPHER BOUZEK 15 SAINT MORITZ TERR PARK CITY UT 84098
JOHN H NEWTON 4514 S BUTTERNUT RD HOLLADAY UT 84117
JOHN HANSEN 637 RANCHO ARROYO FREMONT CA 94336
JOHN MICHAEL HEAGIN 110 S 800 E # 403 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
JONATHAN JUDD; CHRISTI JUDD (JT)127 S 800 E # 26 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
JONNICA KAIRN; JEFFREY L KAIRN (JT)19282 MAUNA LN HUNTINGTO CA 92646
JOSHUA S MORRILL 127 S 800 E # 30 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
JRD HOLDINGS LLC 8791 S TERRA POINTE W WEST JORDUT 84088
JULIANA POWELL 9863 S COUNTRYWOOD SANDY UT 84092
JULIE M BRADFORD 150 S 800 E # A12 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
KEMEI LIN 150 S 800 E #A3 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
KESI SAINSBURY 110 S 800 E # 404 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
KIMBERLI D BROWN 3006 MOUNTAIN RIDG PARK CITY UT 84060
KRIDIT INVESTMENTS, LLC PO BOX 695 CENTERVIL UT 84014
KRISTEN KANACK 654 E OXFORD HOLLOW MURRAY UT 84107
KRISTIAN KALLAKER 127 S 800 E #16 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
KURT S WERDER; KRISTIN N BAER-WERDER150 S 800 E # A8 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
KYLE K RICHARDS 143 S 800 E SALT LAKE CUT 84102
LAS TRUST 110 S 800 E # 307 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
LEE LIVENGOOD; MELISSA LIVENGOOD (JT 490 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CUT 84103
LEIGH ANNE BERNAL 846 E GARFIELD AVE SALT LAKE CUT 84105
LESLIE C HAARUP 838 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CUT 84102
LEVI P GEPHART; LINDSAY GEPHART (JT)11241 S TRENT DR SOUTH JOR UT 84095
LOUIS D CURTIS; JULIET T CURTIS (JT)2007 E MALIBU DR TEMPE AZ 85282
LP 150 APARTMENTS 3021 CITRUS CIR WALNUT C CA 94598
LUND 700 LLC 357 W 200 S # 200 SALT LAKE CUT 84101
MARCI MOON 730 E 100 S SALT LAKE CUT 84102
MARIANNE C NEWELL; ANGELINA B NEWE 110 S 800 E #20 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
MARK F ROARK 249 S 100 W PROVIDENCUT 84332
MARK S THORSEN; GIGI N THORSEN (JT)150 S 800 E # C1 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
MFSF 13 MARLBOROUGH STR CAULFIELD IC 3161
MICHAEL D HILL 14737 S ALPINE VIEW D HERRIMAN UT 84096
MICHELLE O ILK; MICHAEL J ILK (JT)3558 E DOVERHILL DR COTTONWO UT 84121
MILLAR 2016 FAMILY TRUST 12/14/2016; 4085 HIGHWAY 4 ANGELS CA CA 95222
NATHAN J MEMMOTT 110 S 800 E # 407 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
NIC CITY INVESTMENTS LLC 380 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CUT 84103
NORA C GALLEGOS; JOE M GALLEGOS (JT)231 E HAMPTON AVE SALT LAKE CUT 84111
OLIVER FLATT; MATTHEW RAYMOND FLAT 2285 S BENCHMARK CI SALT LAKE CUT 84109
PADDOCK PROPERTY LLC 150 S 800 E #G- SALT LAKE CUT 84102
PAIGE N ROCKWELL 150 S 800 E #E5 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
PARTRIDGE PLACE 25 LLC 2070 W 5025 S ROY UT 84067
PATRICK ECCLES 150 S 800 E # A11 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
PETER HASLAM 751 E 200 S SALT LAKE CUT 84102
PETER HILDYARD 147 S 800 E SALT LAKE CUT 84102
PRINCETON LOFTS LLC 357 W 200 S # 250 SALT LAKE CUT 84101
R CORY LLEWELYN; KOREY C LLEWELYN (JT127 S 800 E # 37 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
RAHMAN BADARANE; DEYZE B BADARANE 9245 REGENTS RD # M1 LA JOLLA CA 92037
RICHARD & JANICE WRIGHT LIVING TRUST 634 E 4630 S MURRAY UT 84107
ROBERT L GRAHAM 7911 S PONDEROSA WY SANDY UT 84094
ROGER L NIELSON; NYRA S NIELSON (JT)476 E 300 N EPHRAIM UT 84627
RYAN M ANDERSON 127 S 800 E #18 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CUT 84111
SAMUEL G TURNER; TIERNEY D TURNER (J 110 S 800 E #20 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
SANDRINE C MCDONALD LIVING TRUST 122322 E ELLISONWOODS COTTONWO UT 84121
SERIES PARTRIDGE PLACE 32 OF SYCAMOR 231 E 400 S SALT LAKE CUT 84111
SHARA J HILLIER 110 S 800 E # 207 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
SMITHS FORK LLC 30125 HILLSIDE TERRAC SAN JUAN CCA 92675
SNOWBALL CAPITAL LLC 1649 N 2600 W LEHI UT 84043
STOKER ENTERPRISES LLC 144 S 700 E # 2 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
TABOR LUTHERAN CHURCH 175 S 700 E SALT LAKE CUT 84102
TERRY J HARDING; DEBRA J HARDING (JT)4218 S FOOTHILL DR BOUNTIFULUT 84010
TROLLEY REGENT CONDOMINIUMS PH 1 2 5200 S HIGHLAND DR # HOLLADAY UT 84117
OCCUPANT/PROPERTY OWNER 768 E 800 S SALT LAKE CUT 84102
OCCUPANT/PROPERTY OWNER 17065 EDGEWATER LN HUNTINGTO CA 92649
OCCUPANT/PROPERTY OWNER 8625 E VIA DEL PALACIO SCOTTSDALAZ 85258
OCCUPANT/PROPERTY OWNER 485 TOWERS DR SALEM UT 84653
OCCUPANT/PROPERTY OWNER 1685 CORONADO ST IDAHO FAL ID 83404
OCCUPANT/PROPERTY OWNER 150 S 800 E # G4 SALT LAKE CUT 84102
OCCUPANT/PROPERTY OWNER 315 W HUENEME RD CAMARILLOCA 93012
TUTTO TRANQUILO, LLC 8690 S ESCALADE CIR COTTONWO UT 84121
UTAH COMPLEX, LLC PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CUT 84152
UTNV PARKLANE LLC 1422 CLARKVIEW ROAD BALTIMOREMD 21209
VICTOR MIELE 1411 S UTAH ST # 6 SALT LAKE CUT 84104
WALTER GOINS 4671 W DAYBREAK RIM SOUTH JOR UT 84009
WANDA I RAMOS; F LAMAR PENOVICH (JT 1620 E CREEK RD SANDY UT 84093
WASATCH PROPERTIES SLC LLC 3693 E COVEPOINT DR SALT LAKE CUT 84109
WISE NG; KUO-YEN HWANG (JT)1783 S MOHAWK WY SALT LAKE CUT 84108
Kevin Perry Alta Terra Real Estate 3100 Pinebrook Rd. Ste Park City UT 84098
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:November 16, 2021
RE: Alley Vacation at 1200 Block of Kensington and Bryan Avenues
PLNPCM2021-00413
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will be briefed about a proposal to vacate an east/west City-owned alley from the McClelland
Trail (~1200 East) to 1300 East between homes on Kensington and Bryan Avenues. It is approximately 11
feet wide and 717 feet long, adjacent to 28 properties on Kensington and Bryan Avenues, and homes at
1542 and 1550 South 1300 East. The alley does not continue west beyond the McClelland Trail or east of
1300 East. It should be noted access to and use of the McClelland Trail will not be impacted if the alley is
vacated.
The applicant included signatures supporting the alley vacation from 23 of the 28 adjacent property
owners. None of the remaining property owners have communicated any objection to Planning or Council
staff as of the date of this report.
During City department and division review of the alley vacation application, the Engineering Division
objected to the proposal stating the division gererally opposes any vacation of rights-of-way. Rocky
Mountain Power stated establishing an 11’ wide utility easement on the alley property would be acceptable.
The applicant is aware of and amenable to a utility easement.
The subject alley is impassable due to a garage obstructing access at the east end and various
encroachments from other abutting properties. Historic photographs indicate the structure at the alley’s
eastern end and potentially other encroachments have been in place since at least 1970. Planning staff
stated that other than a curb cut and some concrete slabs to access the garage from 1300 East, there is little
evidence the alley ever existed through the block other than on paper.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: November 16, 2021
Set Date: November 16, 2021
Public Hearing: December 7, 2021
Potential Action: December 14, 2021
Page | 2
Planning staff recommended and the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to
vacate the alley to the City Council. In its recommendation the Commission also included a condition to
establish a public utility easement along the alley property.
If approved by the City Council, the subject alley property would be vacated and incorporated into abutting
property owners’ parcels.
Image courtesy Salt Lake City Planning Division
Goal of the briefing: To review the proposed alley closure, address questions Council Members may
have and prepare for a public hearing.
POLICY QUESTION
1. If the Council is supportive of this alley closure request, will it include the public utilities easement
recommendation?
ADDITONAL INFORMATION
Alley vacation requests receive three phases of review, as outlined in section 14.52.030 Salt Lake City Code
(see pages 5 - 7 below). Those phases include an administrative determination of completeness; a public
hearing, including a recommendation from the Planning Commission; and a public hearing before the City
Council.
The Planning Commission staff report provides information relating to the following five key
considerations related to this alley vacation. A short description of each issue is provided below for
reference. Please see pages 3-4 of the Planning Commission staff report for full analysis of these issues.
Page | 3
1. Property Owner Consent
Section 14.52.030.A.1 Salt Lake City Code states “the petition must bear the signatures of no less
than seventy five percent (75%) of the neighbors owning property which abuse the subject alley
property.” As noted above, 23 of 28 abutting property owners (82%) signed the petition supporting
the alley vacation.
2.Policy Considerations
City Code states alley vacations will be considered only when proposals satisfy at least one of the
following policy considerations: Lack of Use; Public Safety; Urban Design; Community Purpose.
Planning staff found the proposed alley vacation is consistent with the lack of use policy
consideration. It is Planning staff’s belief sidewalks on Kensington and Bryan Avenues are a
sufficient connection between the McClelland Trail and 1300 East.
3.Master Plan Considerations
Planning staff found using the subject alley as a pedestrian walkway would be redundant in
accomplishing the goals of the Central Community Master Plan and Plan Salt Lake
recommendations for mid-block access and connections. The McClelland Trail provides
north/south access, and as discussed above, sidewalks on Kensington and Bryan Avenues are
east/west connections between the trail and 1300 East.
4.Nature of the Alley
As noted above, there is little evidence the alley existed other than on paper. Attachment B (pages
6-12 of the Planning Commission staff report) includes aerial photographs of the alley and ground
level photos of the eastern and western ends of the alley.
5. Future Public Use of the Alley
Planning staff stated providing pedestrian or vehicle access to the alley would require significant City
resources to remove trees and buildings and pave the alley. It would also likely be unpopular with
adjacent residents.
Planning noted the power lines currently running through the alley and stated a utility easement within
the alley would preserve access for public utility providers.
Attachment D (pages 32-34 of the Planning Commission staff report) is an analysis of factors City Code requires
the Planning Commission to consider for alley vacations (Section 14.52.030 B Salt Lake City Code). In addition
to the information above, other factors are summarized below. Planning staff found the proposed alley vacation
complies with seven of the eight factors below. For the complete analysis, please refer to the staff report.
City Code required analysis: The City Police Department, Fire Department, Transportation Division
and all other relevant City departments and divisions have no reasonable objection to the proposed
disposition of the property.
Finding: Does not comply. As noted above, City Engineering objected to the alley vacation. According
to Engineering staff, the division generally opposes any vacation of public rights-of-way. Other City
departments and divisions had no issues with the proposal or provided no comments. Rocky Mountain
Power stated establishing an 11’ wide utility easement on the alley property would be acceptable.
City Code required analysis: The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations for closure,
vacation or abandonment of City owned alleys (Lack of Use, Public Safety, Urban Design, Community
Purpose).
Page | 4
Finding: Complies. Planning staff determined the proposed alley vacation satisfies the Lack of Use
policy consideration.
City Code required analysis: The petition must not deny sole access or required off-street parking to
any adjacent property.
Finding: Complies. No abutting properties use the subject alley for required off-street parking.
City Code required analysis: The petition will not result in any property being landlocked.
Finding: Complies. All abutting properties have public street access. No property would be landlocked
as a result of this alley vacation request.
City Code required analysis: The disposition of the alley property will not result in a use which is
otherwise contrary to the policies of the City, including applicable master plans and other adopted
statements of policy which address, but which are not limited to, mid-block walkways, pedestrian paths,
trails, and alternative transportation uses.
Finding: Complies. Vacating the subject alley will not create or result in any use that is contrary to City
policies. The residential character of the block would remain essentially the same as it is now since all
abutting properties already encroach on the subject alley.
City Code required analysis: No opposing abutting property owner intends to build a garage
requiring access from the property, or has made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has
been issued, construction has been completed within 12 months of issuance of the building permit.
Finding: Complies. While five abutting property owners did not sign the initial petition, they have not
raised any opposition to the vacation. Additionally, as of the publishing date of this report, the Building
Services Division has not received any building permit application to construct a garage that would use
the existing public right of way for access.
City Code required analysis: The petition furthers the City preference for disposing of an entire
alley, rather than a small segment of it.
Finding: Complies. The applicant has requested to vacate the entire length of the alley between 1300
East and the McClelland Trail (Jordan & Salt Lake City Canal). No segment would remain if the vacation
were approved.
City Code required analysis: The alley property is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to
residences or for accessory uses.
Finding: Complies. None of the properties abutting the subject alley use it for rear access.
PUBLIC PROCESS
June 7, 2021-Notice of the alley vacation request sent to the East Liberty Park and Wasatch Hollow
Community Council Chairs with a link to the online open house webpage. Neither community council
asked Planning staff or the applicant to attend one of their meetings.
The Wasatch Hollow Community Council expressed support for the proposed alley vacation provided it
does not interfere with the Jordan and Salt Lake Canal (which it does not).
Early notification announcement sent to residents and owners within 300 feet of the subject alley. The
notice included information about the online open house webpage and how to provide public comment.
July 15, 2021-Public Hearing notice mailed.
July 16, 2021-Public notice posted on City and State websites and Planning Division listserv.
Page | 5
July 28, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing. There were no comments at the hearing. The
Commission closed the hearing and voted to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council.
The process for closing or vacating a City-owned alley is outlined in Section 14.52 Salt Lake City Code.
14.52.010: DISPOSITION OF CITY'S PROPERTY INTEREST IN ALLEYS:
The city supports the legal disposition of Salt Lake City's real property interests, in whole or in part,
with regard to city owned alleys, subject to the substantive and procedural requirements set forth
herein.
14.52.020: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CLOSURE, VACATION OR
ABANDONMENT OF CITY OWNED ALLEYS:
The city will not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it receives a
petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one of the following
policy considerations:
A. Lack Of Use: The city's legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an
applicable plat; however, it is evident from an onsite inspection that the alley does not
physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public
right of way;
B. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful
activity, unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area;
C. Urban Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element;
or
D. Community Purpose: The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of
the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. (Ord. 24-02
§ 1, 2002)
14.52.030: PROCESSING PETITIONS:
There will be three (3) phases for processing petitions to dispose of city owned alleys under this
section. Those phases include an administrative determination of completeness; a public hearing,
including a recommendation from the Planning Commission; and a public hearing before the City
Council.
A. Administrative Determination Of Completeness: The city administration will determine whether
or not the petition is complete according to the following requirements:
1. The petition must bear the signatures of no less than seventy five percent (75%) of the
neighbors owning property which abuts the subject alley property;
2. The petition must identify which policy considerations discussed above support the petition;
3. The petition must affirm that written notice has been given to all owners of property located in
the block or blocks within which the subject alley property is located;
4. A signed statement that the applicant has met with and explained the proposal to the
appropriate community organization entitled to receive notice pursuant to title 2, chapter 2.60
of this code; and
Page | 6
5. The appropriate city processing fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule has
been paid.
B. Public Hearing and Recommendation From The Planning Commission: Upon receipt of a
complete petition, a public hearing shall be scheduled before the planning commission to
consider the proposed disposition of the city owned alley property. Following the conclusion of
the public hearing, the planning commission shall make a report and recommendation to the
city council on the proposed disposition of the subject alley property. A positive
recommendation should include an analysis of the following factors:
1. The city police department, fire department, transportation division, and all other relevant city
departments and divisions have no reasonable objection to the proposed disposition of the
property;
2. The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated above;
3. Granting the petition will not deny sole access or required off street parking to any property
adjacent to the alley;
4. Granting the petition will not result in any property being landlocked;
5. Granting the petition will not result in a use of the alley property which is otherwise contrary
to the policies of the city, including applicable master plans and other adopted statements of
policy which address, but which are not limited to, mid-block walkways, pedestrian paths,
trails, and alternative transportation uses;
6. No opposing abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the
property, or has made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has been issued,
construction has been completed within twelve (12) months of issuance of the building permit;
7. The petition furthers the city preference for disposing of an entire alley, rather than a small
segment of it; and
8. The alley property is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for
accessory uses.
C. Public Hearing Before The City Council: Upon receipt of the report and recommendation from
the planning commission, the city council will consider the proposed petition for disposition of
the subject alley property. After a public hearing to consider the matter, the city council will
make a decision on the proposed petition based upon the factors identified above. (Ord. 58-13,
2013: Ord. 24-11, 2011)
14.52.040: METHOD OF DISPOSITION:
If the city council grants the petition, the city owned alley property will be disposed of as follows:
A. Low Density Residential Areas: If the alley property abuts properties which are zoned for low
density residential use, the alley will merely be vacated. For the purposes of this section, "low
density residential use" shall mean properties which are zoned for single-family, duplex or twin
home residential uses.
B. High Density Residential Properties And Other Nonresidential Properties: If the alley abuts
properties which are zoned for high density residential use or other nonresidential uses, the
alley will be closed and abandoned, subject to payment to the city of the fair market value of
that alley property, based upon the value added to the abutting properties.
Page | 7
C. Mixed Zoning: If an alley abuts both low density residential properties and either high density
residential properties or nonresidential properties, those portions which abut the low density
residential properties shall be vacated, and the remainder shall be closed, abandoned and sold
for fair market value. (Ord. 24-02 § 1, 2002)
14.52.050: PETITION FOR REVIEW:
Any party aggrieved by the decision of the city council as to the disposition of city owned alley
property may file a petition for review of that decision within thirty (30) days after the city council's
decision becomes final, in the 3rd district court.
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: October 18, 2021
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: PLNPCM2021-00413 - Alley Vacation at 1200 Block of Kensington and Bryan
Avenues
STAFF CONTACT: Aaron Barlow, Principal Planner, aaron.barlow@slcgov.com, 385-386-2764
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The City Council follows the Planning Commission’s recommendation
to approve the ordinance to Vacate the Alley located within the 1200 Block of Kensington and
Bryan Avenues on the condition that a public utility easement is established in its place.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
This is a request from Steven Black, property owner of 1236 East Kensington Avenue,
representing the property owners of the adjacent parcels, to vacate the 11-foot-wide, 717-foot-long
alley located within the 1200 block of East Kensington and Bryan Avenues that runs east to west
from 1300 East to the McClelland Trail (Jordan & Salt Lake City Canal). The petition to vacate
the alley was signed by 23 of the 28 owners of property abutting the alley. The alley is essentially
unused as a public right of way and impassible to travel because of encroachment from the adjacent
properties. The intent of the request is to incorporate the unused alley into the adjacent properties.
With their positive recommendation, the Planning Commission recommended establishing a
public utility easement in the alley’s place. Additional information regarding this request can be
found in Planning Commission Record C, (Planning Commission Staff Report of July 28, 2021).
Lisa Shaffer (Oct 19, 2021 15:56 MDT)
10/19/2021
10/19/2021
PUBLIC PROCESS:
• Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners
located within 300 feet of the subject Alley on June 7, 2021.
• Notice was also sent to the Chairs of the East Liberty Neighborhood Organization and Wasatch
Hollow Community Council on June 7, 2021.
• Staff hosted an online open house to solicit public comments on the proposal. The online Open
House period started on June 7, 2021 and ended on July 14, 2021.
• Staff received letters from both the East Liberty Neighborhood Organization and the Wasatch
Hollow Community Council. They were included with the Planning Commission report.
• Staff also received seven public comments, which were included with the Planning
Commission report.
• The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing for this request on July 28, 2021. By a vote
of 5-1, they forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed Alley
Vacation with the condition that a utility easement be established in its place.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
A. PC Agenda of July 28, 2021 (Click to Access)
B. PC Minutes of July 28, 2021 (Click to Access)
C. Planning Commission Staff Report of July 28, 2021 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3. Original Petition
4. Mailing List
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ________ of 20___
(Vacating a city-owned alley situated in the Amended Plat of Whitaker Subdivision of Lots 18
and 19, Block 16A, 5Acre Plat A. Big Field Survey located between lots 1-55 running from 1300
East Street and the Salt Lake & Jordan Canal)
An ordinance vacating an 11 foot wide unnamed city-owned alley situated in the
Amended Plat of Whitaker Subdivision of Lots 18 and 19, Block 16A, 5Acre Plat A. Big Field
Survey located between lots 1-55 running from 1300 East Street and the Salt Lake & Jordan
Canal, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00413.
WHEREAS, an 11 foot wide public alley running east and west through Block 2 of the
Amended Plat of Whitaker Subdivision of Lots 18 and 19, Block 16A, 5 Acre Plat A. Big Field
Survey was dedicated for public use;
WHEREAS, the City has authority by state law to vacate public streets, including alleys;
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “planning commission”) held
a public hearing on July 28, 2021, to consider a request made by Steven Black (“Applicant”)
(Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00413) on behalf of the alley’s 28 adjacent property owners; and
WHEREAS, at its July 28, 2021, hearing, the planning commission voted in favor of
forwarding a positive recommendation on said petition to the Salt Lake City Council;
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council (the “city council”) held a legally notified public
hearing as per section 10-9a-208 of the Utah Code on _____________;
WHEREAS, the city council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter, that the
city’s interest in the city-owned alley as more particularly described in Exhibit A,” attached
hereto and incorporated by reference, is reflected on a plat; however, the alley has been
materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right of way;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there is good cause for the vacation of the alley
and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the proposed
vacation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the vacation of the alley upon the conditions set
forth herein are in the best interest of Salt Lake City.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Vacating City-Owned Alley. That an unnamed, city-owned alley situated
in the Amended Plat of Whitaker Subdivision of Lots 18 and 19, Block 16A, 5Acre Plat A. Big
Field Survey located between lots 1-55 running from 1300 East Street and the Salt Lake &
Jordan Canal, which is the subject of Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00413, and which is more
particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto, hereby is, vacated and declared not
presently necessary or available for public use.
SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The vacation is expressly made subject to
all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now
located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry
thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities,
including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing
rights-of-way or easements of private third parties.
SECTION 3. Conditions. This proposed alley vacation is conditioned upon the
following:
1.) A reservation of easement, evidenced by a declaration of easement, recorded by and
for the benefit of the City for purposes of the use and location of public utilities.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. The city recorder is
instructed not to publish or record this ordinance until Real Estate Services certifies that the
condition has been satisfied.
SECTION 5. Time. If the conditions identified above have not been met within one year
after adoption, this ordinance shall become null and void. The city council may, for good cause
shown, by resolution, extend the time period for satisfying the conditions identified above.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of
______________, 20___.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 20___
Published: ______________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Hannah Vickery, Senior City Attorney
9/22/21
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal description of the unnamed, city-owned
alley to be vacated:
AN 11.00 FOOT WIDE ALLEY TO BE VACATED WITHIN BLOCK 2 OF WHITAKER
SUBDIVISION AMENDED, SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;
COMMENCING AT THE MONUMENT IN THE INTERSECTION OF KENSINGTON
AVENUE & 1300 EAST STREET (POC); THENCE S89⁰56’37W ALONG THE MONUMENT
LINE IN KENSINGTON AVENUE (BASIS OF BEARINGS) A DISTANCE OF 6.55 FEET
AND S00⁰10’33”W A DISTANCE OF 29.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
BLOCK 2, WHITAKER SUBDIVISION AMENDED, AND CONTINUING S00⁰10’33”W
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF BLOCK 2 (ALSO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 55) A
DISTANCE OF 105.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 55 TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING (POB).
THENCE N89⁰55’03”W ALONG THE SOUTH LINES OF LOTS 29-55 A DISTANCE OF
715.62 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 29;
THENCE S06⁰32’02”W A DISTANCE OF 3.96 FEET;
THENCE S13⁰00’36”W A DISTANCE OF 7.25 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
LOT 28 OF SAID BLOCK;
THENCE S89⁰55’03”E ALONG THE NORTH LINES OF LOTS 1-28 A DISTANCE OF
717.67 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 AND A POINT ON THE EAST
LINE OF SAID BLOCK 2;
THENCE N00⁰10’33”E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF BLOCK 2 A DISTANCE OF 11.00
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 0.18 ACRES.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3. Original Petition
4. Mailing List
1. Project Chronology
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2021-00413 – Alley Vacation at 1200 Block of Kensington and Bryan Avenues
April 27, 2021 Petition for Alley Vacation received by the Planning Division.
May 27, 2021 Petition assigned to Aaron Barlow, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing.
June 7, 2021 Notice of the project and request for comments sent to the Chairs of the East Liberty
Neighborhood Organization and the Wasatch Hollow Community Council.
June 7, 2021 Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal. The
online open house period started on June 7, 2021, and ended on July 14, 2021.
July 14, 2021 Public Hearing Notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning
listserv for the July 28, 2021, Planning Commission meeting. Public hearing notice
mailed to owners and tenants of property within 300 feet of the alley.
July 16, 2021 Public hearing notice sign with project information posted around block containing
subject alley.
July 28, 2021 Planning Commission reviewed the petition and conducted a public hearing. The
Commission then voted to send a positive recommendation to the City Council.
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2021-00413 - Alley
Vacation at 1200 Block of Kensington and Bryan Avenues - This is a request from
Steven Black, representing the property owners of the adjacent parcels, to vacate the 11-
foot wide alley within the 1200 block of East Kensington and Bryan Avenues that runs
east to west from 1300 East to the McClelland Trail. The intent of the request is to
incorporate the unused alley into the adjacent properties. The subject alley is located
within the R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District and is within Council District 5,
represented by Darin Mano. (Staff contact: Aaron Barlow at 385-386-2764 or
aaron.barlow@slcgov.com).
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive
comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be
held:
DATE:
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b). Please visit slc.gov/council/news/featured-
news/virtually-attend-city-council-meetings-2/ to learn how you can share
your comments live during electronic City Council meetings. If you would like
to provide feedback or comments via email or phone, please contact us
through our 24-hour comment line at 801-535-7654 or by email at
council.comments@slcgov.com.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please
call Aaron Barlow at 385-386-2764 between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday or via e-mail at aaron.barlow@slcgov.com.
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make
requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats,
interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two
business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535- 7600, or relay service 711.
3. Original Petition
4. Mailing List
NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
W&NE FAM TR 10023 S WASATCH BLVD SANDY UT 84092
KATELIN GOINGS 1089 S MCCLELLAND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
ALEXANDER A ZUHL 1147 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
MARGARET D & MARK K MEYERS 1165 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
CECILY A LIGHT 1167 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JOHN W BRANSON 1170 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
MICHAEL HESS 1172 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
TIFFANY ROUSCULP & CHRIS LIPPARD 1172 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
CAROL SHINKOSKEY 1175 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
KLAIR WHITE 1176 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
ELLEN E GOLDBERG & CLONTON PERSCHON 1177 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
SHELLEY L HENSON 1179 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JAMIE CHRISTENSEN; DI GIACOMO, LISA CHRISTENSEN 1179 E MILTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
FELICIA ALVAREZ 1180 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JAKE C & SUZANNE RICKER 1182 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
ASHLIN V SMITH 1184 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
MATTHEW RAY & MADISON BLOCKER 1186 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
DAVID M SUHRE & BRIDGET A FARFEL 1188 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
HOA HOANG 1189 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
GREG & EMILY VANDYKE 1193 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
PEGGY ANDERSON 1195 E MILTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
CHRISTINE E JAHJA &INGRID B BLANKEVOORT 1199 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
ALEXANDER J ALLEN 1206 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
THOMAS A & LESLIE A KEMP 1207 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
MICHAEL J & JILL NICOLE MOSDELL 1211 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
ERICK R BILLETDEAUX & STEPHANIE J ATHERTON 1212 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
MARC MOODY 1216 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
RICHELLE RASMUSSEN & ANDREA T JAGER 1218 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
STEVEN L & JUNE A OLSEN 1218 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JESSICA THOMAS 1218 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JOHN G ALLEMAN 1220 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
ANDREW C & HANNAH E ETHERINGTON 1225 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JRH FAM TRUST 1225 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
RODNEY J GORDON 1226 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
SHAHRAM KARAKHANI 1226‐1228 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
CHAD M & PAMELA A SALVADORE 1228 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JEFFREY A C LEFAVOR 1229 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
WENDY L NELSON 1230 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
RUDY J & YVONNE M SCHENK 1230 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
RUSSELL E COSTA 1233 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
PAVLIK‐LOUDERBACK REVOCABLE TRUST 1233 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
DANIELLE & ELIJAH SZASZ 1234 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
DARRELL L PETERSEN 1234 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
STEVE BLACK 1236 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JOI T MATSUKAWA 1236 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
KRISTEN AMEEL 1238 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
BICYCLE KICK, LLC 124 19TH ST HERMOSA BEACH CA 90254
AARON BARLOW 1242 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
J RICH WHITTAKER 1244 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
MICHAEL K KING 1246 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
ZAHRA GHORBANI 1247 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
WILL JAMISON 1248 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
CHRISTOPHER A & SARAH H TAYLOR 1250 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
PATRICK WILSON 1250 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
PETER REGIS & THOMAS CHILTON BENNETT 1253 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
STEVENSON FAMILY TRUST 1255 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
RALPH D & COLLEEN S CHIPMAN FAMILY TRUST 1256 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
HAYES, DELBERT K & HONG‐HAYES, HUI C 1258 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JENNA M PIKE 1259 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
LWH LIV TRUST 1260 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
DUNCAN HILTON 1262 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
WILHELM KAPFHAMMER 1265 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
LISA C KRILEY 1266 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JODIE L SWANSON 1268 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
PAUL GREGORY RUBIN 1271 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
STEPHEN GRAY & KRISTINE FERREIRA 1273 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
VIRGIL L & MIRIAM MERRILL 1276 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
TERRY K SMITH & EILEEN NAUGHTON 1276 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
BRIAN P DANG 1280 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JASON ALBINO & CARI LYNN NICHOLSON 1284 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JEFFERY C & NICOLE R BECK 1315 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
NICHOLAS W & JODI L NORRIS 1319 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
MARC KORBULY 1321 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
ANDERSEN, KAI A & ILENE S; TRS 1323 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
DAVID & DENA DEBRY 1324 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
RYAN S & BETH A STUTSMAN 1324 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
CHRISTINA & JEREMY FALK 1327 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
LOUIS W PITT 1330 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
WILLIAM C & JOANN HANSON 1332 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
HECTOR JR & MARLENE SUAREZ 1371 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
1175 MILTON LLC 14029 S 8TH PL PHOENIX AZ 85048
JACKIE & PAUL EDGCOMB 1405 US HIGHWAY 130 HIGHTSTOWN NJ 08520
M. KEITH & ELLIE D. PENDLETON 1514 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
EMOND, ABRAHAM M & HEUSCHER, SONJA A 1515 SCENIC LOOP FAIRBANKS AK 99709
MATTHEW A BARRAZA & RICHARD ANTHONY MILLER 1520 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JULIE A STOUT 1535 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
WILLIAM V & TAMARA RUESCH 1536 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
WILFORD W WHITAKER & SUSAN ANN BOHNING 1537 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JEFFERY OLESEN 1541 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
LEANN KAMAU 1549 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
ALBORZ GHANDEHARI 1550 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JIMMY KHUE NGO 1567 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
DNH REV TRUST 1570 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
MICHAEL MIKE VARDAKIS 1573 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
BV 1300 EAST, LLC 1580 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
RICHARD ANDREW GODFREY & JOSEPH PIETRAFESA 1588 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
CHRISTOPHER C LINDSEY & LAURA E GILCHRIST 1589 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
BLAKE & SUSANNA G KARRINGTON 1593‐1595 S 1200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
MJRFT 1646 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108
W.J.H. PROPERTY, LLC 1694 E MILLBROOK RD MILLCREEK UT 84106
PARTH GANDHI 1809 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108
CLOVER ENTERPRISES, LLC 187 E DORCHESTER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SUGAR HOUSE PROJECT LLC 1943 BEAR HOLLOW DR PARK CITY UT 84098
MOUNTAIN SUNSHINE LLC 2466 S PROMONTORY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109
VINCENT & EUGENIA DREYER 2553 N CYPRESS WAY LEHI UT 84043
MARK ALDER 2779 E 2880 S MILLCREEK UT 84109
MIRIAM ELLIS 2883 E BELTON CIR SANDY UT 84093
ANTON BURTSEV & GANNA M SHESTAKOVA 3007 BARCLAY WAY ANN ARBOR MI 48105
STEPHEN A REGAN 3031 E MORNINGSIDE DR HOLLADAY UT 84124
KIMBERLY NORMAN & DALE W HARRELL JR 3166 S 2700 E MILLCREEK UT 84109
BENJAMIN M & MARY W WHEELER 4065 S EVELYN DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124
HMTW INVESTMENT LLC 4088 W 1630 N LEHI UT 84043
LEHUA 1224, LLC 4115 NE 66TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97218
CAMASASLC, LLC 4275 PALOMINO CIR RENO NV 89519
JESSE J HEINEMAN & KIMBERLY S SHELDON 4512 GARDEN RD KNOXVILLE TN 37919
KOTA & ANASTASIA IKEDA 4666 MISSION AVE # 5 SAN DIEGO CA 92116
SUZANNE DOUTRE 4762 S NANILOA DR HOLLADAY UT 84117
RVM REV TR 5141 S EASTMOOR RD HOLLADAY UT 84117
INDY REVOCABLE TRUST 516 DAWSON RD AUSTIN TX 78704
HIRSCHEL ADLER PROPERTIES LLC 6 STILLWATER IRVINE CA 92603
TIMOTHY S & CAMILLE ALEXANDER 6127 SW NEVADA CT PORTLAND OR 97219
CLG LIV TR 6149 GLEN OAK ST LOS ANGELES CA 90068
JON K SIMONSEN & PHILLIP MOULTON 69 BRUCKNER BLVD APT 3 BRONX NY 10454
DAVID BODELL & TRISHA CALLELLA 8680 SHANNON RIVER CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
DENNIS OWENS 921 S GREENWOOD TER SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JOSE T & MARIA S TOFOLLA 962 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
PLATINUM CENTURY INVESTMENTS LLC 965 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108
MELROY & DONNA HARWARD 9928 S TREASURE CIR SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095
ELEANOR M MILLER PO BOX 521141 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152
ALAN T & TINA M DROEGEMEIER PO BOX 526383 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152
Current Occupant 1178 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1180 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1163 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1185 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1234 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1236 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1256 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1278 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1498 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1219 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1245 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1249 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1265 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1205 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1511 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1515 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1315 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1170 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1192 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1196 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1175 E MILTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1208 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1216 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1224 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1213 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1219 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1229 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1273 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1542 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1558 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1560 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1241 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1202 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1206 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1242 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1252 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1258 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1266 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1568 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1578 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1595 S 1200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1256 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1592 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1226 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1555 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1316 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1312 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
Current Occupant 1581 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:November 16, 2021
RE: Columbus Street Alley North of Victory Road
PLNPCM2020-00564
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will be briefed about a proposal to vacate a north/south City-owned alley north of Victory
Road and adjacent to properties at 583, 585, 589, and 595 North Columbus Street, and 590 North Victory
Road as shown in the image below. The five properties have a total of four property owners, all of whom
signed a petition supportive of the alley vacation.
Properties adjacent to the alley are zoned R-2 (Single- and two-family residential district), and OS (Open
Space). The subject alley is approximately 150 feet long and total area is approximately 2,750 square feet.
An alley segment north of the subject alley was previously vacated, and the southern end of the alley
terminates at a UDOT right-of-way. The alley was recorded but undeveloped and exists only on paper. It is
unlikely the alley could ever be developed due to steep topography of the hillside on which it is located.
Planning staff recommended and the Planning Commission forwarded a unanimous positive
recommendation to the City Council for the alley vacation.
If approved by the City Council, the subject alley property would be vacated and incorporated into abutting
property owners’ parcels. Owners of the residential properties would not be charged for their ½ width
portions of the alley. The Open Space zoned parcel is privately owned, and that property owner would be
charged market value for the ½ width alley property abutting theirs.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: November 16, 2021
Set Date: November 16, 2021
Public Hearing: December 7, 2021
Potential Action: December 14, 2021
Page | 2
Image courtesy Salt Lake City Planning Division
Goal of the briefing: To review the proposed alley closure, address questions Council Members may
have and prepare for a public hearing.
ADDITONAL INFORMATION
Alley vacation requests receive three phases of review, as outlined in section 14.52.030 Salt Lake City Code
(see pages 4-6 below). Those phases include an administrative determination of completeness; a public
hearing, including a recommendation from the Planning Commission; and a public hearing before the City
Council.
The Planning Commission staff report provides information relating to the following four key
considerations related to this alley vacation. A short description of each issue is provided below for
reference. Please see pages 3-4 of the Planning Commission staff report for full analysis of these issues.
1. Property Owner Consent
Section 14.52.030.A.1 Salt Lake City Code states “the petition must bear the signatures of no less
than seventy five percent (75%) of the neighbors owning property which abuse the subject alley
property.” As noted above, all four abutting property owners signed the petition supporting the
alley vacation.
Page | 3
2.Creation/History of the Alley and Disposition if Vacated
The City Surveyor found the subject alley was not dedicated through the usual subdivision process.
Rather, it was dedicated as a public right-of-way through the original platting of the city.
As stated above, if the alley vacation is approved by the City Council, residential property owners
would not be charged for the alley abutting their property. The Open Space property owner would
be charged fair market value for the abutting alley property. The method of disposition is included
in Chapter 14.52.040.C Salt Lake City Code below.
3.Existence of the Alley
The alley was platted but exists only on paper. Planning staff noted “While the history is not clear,
it is possible that there may not have been an intent to actually establish an alley in this location.
Given the angle of slope coming off of Victory Road, a UDOT road, it is also likely that if an alley
was planned, it was never built due to the physical constraints of the property grade.”
4.Future Public Uses of the Alley
It is Planning staff’s belief there is no viable future use for the subject alley. No City department
identified potential public uses and did not raise any objections to the alley vacation.
Attachment E (pages 14-16 of the Planning Commission staff report) is an analysis of factors City Code requires
the Planning Commission to consider for alley vacations (Section 14.52.030 B Salt Lake City Code). In addition
to the information above, other factors are summarized below. Planning staff found the proposed alley vacation
complies with all eight factors below. For the complete analysis, please refer to the staff report.
City Code required analysis: The City Police Department, Fire Department, Transportation Division
and all other relevant City departments and divisions have no reasonable objection to the proposed
disposition of the property.
Finding: Complies. No City department raised objection to the alley vacation.
City Code required analysis: The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations for closure,
vacation or abandonment of City owned alleys (Lack of Use, Public Safety, Urban Design, Community
Purpose).
Finding: Complies. Planning staff determined the proposed alley vacation satisfies the Lack of Use
policy consideration.
City Code required analysis: The petition must not deny sole access or required off-street parking to
any adjacent property.
Finding: Complies. Vacating the alley would not impact parking or access to any property.
City Code required analysis: The petition will not result in any property being landlocked.
Finding: Complies. No property would be landlocked as a result of this alley vacation request.
City Code required analysis: The disposition of the alley property will not result in a use which is
otherwise contrary to the policies of the City, including applicable master plans and other adopted
statements of policy which address, but which are not limited to, mid-block walkways, pedestrian paths,
trails, and alternative transportation uses.
Finding: Complies. Vacating the subject alley will not create or result in any use that is contrary to City
policies. There is no use for the alley and it likely could never be built due to site constraints.
Page | 4
City Code required analysis: No opposing abutting property owner intends to build a garage
requiring access from the property, or has made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has
been issued, construction has been completed within 12 months of issuance of the building permit.
Finding: Complies. No abutting property owner opposed the alley vacation and no building permit
applications have been submitted.
City Code required analysis: The petition furthers the City preference for disposing of an entire
alley, rather than a small segment of it.
Finding: Complies. The request is to close a remaining alley segment. A continuation of the alley to the
north was previously vacated, though the City Surveyor was not able to determine when that occurred.
The remaining alley segment would be considered an “entire alley” and as such meets this factor.
City Code required analysis: The alley property is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to
residences or for accessory uses.
Finding: Complies. None of the properties abutting the subject alley use it for rear access.
PUBLIC PROCESS
August 10, 2020-Notice of the project and request for comments sent to the Capitol Hill Neighborhood
Council Chair.
August 11, 2020-Early notification announcement sent to residents and owners within 300 feet of the
subject alley. The notice included information about how to provide public comment.
May 13, 2021-
Public hearing notice mailed
Public hearing notice signs posted on property
Public notice posted on City and State websites, and Planning Division listserv.
May 26, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing. There were no comments at the hearing. The
Commission closed the hearing and voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City
Council.
The process for closing or vacating a City-owned alley is outlined in Section 14.52 Salt Lake City Code.
14.52.010: DISPOSITION OF CITY'S PROPERTY INTEREST IN ALLEYS:
The city supports the legal disposition of Salt Lake City's real property interests, in whole or in part,
with regard to city owned alleys, subject to the substantive and procedural requirements set forth
herein.
14.52.020: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CLOSURE, VACATION OR
ABANDONMENT OF CITY OWNED ALLEYS:
The city will not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it receives a
petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one of the following
policy considerations:
A. Lack Of Use: The city's legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an
applicable plat; however, it is evident from an onsite inspection that the alley does not
physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public
right of way;
Page | 5
B. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful
activity, unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area;
C. Urban Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element;
or
D. Community Purpose: The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of
the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. (Ord. 24-02
§ 1, 2002)
14.52.030: PROCESSING PETITIONS:
There will be three (3) phases for processing petitions to dispose of city owned alleys under this
section. Those phases include an administrative determination of completeness; a public hearing,
including a recommendation from the Planning Commission; and a public hearing before the City
Council.
A. Administrative Determination Of Completeness: The city administration will determine whether
or not the petition is complete according to the following requirements:
1. The petition must bear the signatures of no less than seventy five percent (75%) of the
neighbors owning property which abuts the subject alley property;
2. The petition must identify which policy considerations discussed above support the petition;
3. The petition must affirm that written notice has been given to all owners of property located in
the block or blocks within which the subject alley property is located;
4. A signed statement that the applicant has met with and explained the proposal to the
appropriate community organization entitled to receive notice pursuant to title 2, chapter 2.60
of this code; and
5. The appropriate city processing fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule has
been paid.
B. Public Hearing and Recommendation From The Planning Commission: Upon receipt of a
complete petition, a public hearing shall be scheduled before the planning commission to
consider the proposed disposition of the city owned alley property. Following the conclusion of
the public hearing, the planning commission shall make a report and recommendation to the
city council on the proposed disposition of the subject alley property. A positive
recommendation should include an analysis of the following factors:
1. The city police department, fire department, transportation division, and all other relevant city
departments and divisions have no reasonable objection to the proposed disposition of the
property;
2. The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated above;
3. Granting the petition will not deny sole access or required off street parking to any property
adjacent to the alley;
4. Granting the petition will not result in any property being landlocked;
5. Granting the petition will not result in a use of the alley property which is otherwise contrary
to the policies of the city, including applicable master plans and other adopted statements of
Page | 6
policy which address, but which are not limited to, mid-block walkways, pedestrian paths,
trails, and alternative transportation uses;
6. No opposing abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the
property, or has made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has been issued,
construction has been completed within twelve (12) months of issuance of the building permit;
7. The petition furthers the city preference for disposing of an entire alley, rather than a small
segment of it; and
8. The alley property is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for
accessory uses.
C. Public Hearing Before The City Council: Upon receipt of the report and recommendation from
the planning commission, the city council will consider the proposed petition for disposition of
the subject alley property. After a public hearing to consider the matter, the city council will
make a decision on the proposed petition based upon the factors identified above. (Ord. 58-13,
2013: Ord. 24-11, 2011)
14.52.040: METHOD OF DISPOSITION:
If the city council grants the petition, the city owned alley property will be disposed of as follows:
A. Low Density Residential Areas: If the alley property abuts properties which are zoned for low
density residential use, the alley will merely be vacated. For the purposes of this section, "low
density residential use" shall mean properties which are zoned for single-family, duplex or twin
home residential uses.
B. High Density Residential Properties And Other Nonresidential Properties: If the alley abuts
properties which are zoned for high density residential use or other nonresidential uses, the
alley will be closed and abandoned, subject to payment to the city of the fair market value of
that alley property, based upon the value added to the abutting properties.
C. Mixed Zoning: If an alley abuts both low density residential properties and either high density
residential properties or nonresidential properties, those portions which abut the low density
residential properties shall be vacated, and the remainder shall be closed, abandoned and sold
for fair market value. (Ord. 24-02 § 1, 2002)
14.52.050: PETITION FOR REVIEW:
Any party aggrieved by the decision of the city council as to the disposition of city owned alley
property may file a petition for review of that decision within thirty (30) days after the city council's
decision becomes final, in the 3rd district court.
________________
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Date Received:
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council:
09/24/2021
09/28/2021
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Amy Fowler, Chair
September 24, 2021
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
SUBJECT: Columbus Street Alley Vacation North of Victory Road
STAFF CONTACT: David J. Gellner, AICP, Senior Planner, david.gellner@slcgov.com
(385) 226-3860
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to approve an Ordinance to vacate the alley.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Nicholas Kanaan, a property owner at 585 N. Columbus Street
and James Carr, a property owner at 583 N. Columbus Street are co-petitioners asking to vacate
an approximately 150-foot long section of platted alley adjacent to their respective properties. The
recorded but completely undeveloped alley segment runs north-south of Victory Road and abuts a
total of five (5) properties owned by four (4) different property owners. The continuation of the
alley to the north of this segment was previously vacated. The proposal is to vacate this remaining
alley segment and incorporate the vacant land into the neighboring properties. The total area of the
proposed vacation is approximately 2750 square feet.
The platted alley is highlighted on the aerial photo below. The alley starts north of the UDOT
right-of-way on Victory Road and runs approximately 150 feet to the north. The applicant’s
reason for the request is based on the alley being platted but never having been developed. The
area is filled with tall weeds and the alley could likely never be developed based on the steep
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
Lisa Shaffer (Sep 24, 2021 12:24 MDT)
topography. The applicant asserts that there are no potential future uses for the alley and no
reason to keep it in place.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
• Notice of the project and request for comments sent to the Chair of the Capitol Hill
Neighborhood Council on August 10, 2020.
• Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property
owners located within 300 feet of the project site on August 11, 2020 providing notice
about the project and information on how to give public input on the project.
• No formal comments were submitted by the Capitol Hill Neighborhood Council.
• No public comments were submitted in relation to this proposal.
• A Planning Commission Public Hearing was held on May 26, 2021.
• The Commission also voted unanimously to forward a Positive recommendation to City
Council for the alley vacation.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a) PC Agenda of May 26, 2021 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes of May 26, 2021 (Click to Access)
c) Planning Commission Staff Report of May 26, 2021 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3. Original Petition
4. Mailing List
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2021
(Vacating a city-owned alley situated adjacent to properties located at
583, 585, 589 and 595 North Columbus Street; and; 590 North Victory Road)
An ordinance vacating an unnamed city-owned alley adjacent to properties located at
583, 585, 589 and 595 North Columbus Street; and; 590 North Victory Road, pursuant to
Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00564.
WHEREAS, Nicholas Kanaan, owner of 585 North Columbus Street filed a written
petition, Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00564, to vacate a city-owned alley situated
between properties 583, 585, 589 and 595 North Columbus Street and 590 North Victory Road
and as more particularly described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated by
reference ; and
WHEREAS, the neighboring property owners of 605 North Ensign Street, 589 North
Columbus Street, and 583 North Columbus Street reviewed and also designated in writing their
approval of the petition; and
WHEREAS, the petition demonstrates that the alley does not physically exist despite the
and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 26,
2021, to consider the petition; and
WHEREAS, at its May 26, 2021 meeting, the planning commission following the public
hearing and discussion voted in favor of forwarding a recommendation of approval on the
petition to the Salt Lake City Council ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter, that
there is good cause to vacate the alley and that vacating the alley will not materially injure the
public interest or any person.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Vacating City-Owned Alley. That an unnamed, city-owned alley adjacent
to properties located at 583, 585, 589 and 595 North Columbus Street; and; 590 North Victory
Road, which is the subject of Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00564, and which is more particularly
vacated and declared not presently
necessary or available for public use.
SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The vacation is expressly made subject to
all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now
located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry
thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities,
o any existing rights-
of-way or easements of private third parties.
SECTION 3. Conditions. This vacation is conditioned upon the following:
1) The proposed method of disposition of the alley property shall be consistent with the
the Salt Lake City Code,
and all other applicable laws; and
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. The city recorder is
instructed not to publish or record this ordinance until the conditions identified above have been
met real property manager.
,
SECTION 5. Time. If the conditions identified above have not been met within one year
after adoption, this ordinance shall become null and void. The city council may, for good cause
shown, by resolution, extend the time period for satisfying the conditions identified above.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of
, 2021.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2021
Published: .
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City
Date:_7__/2/_2_02_1
By:
Hannah Vickery, Senior City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal description of the city-owned
alley to be vacated:
A portion of a 20.00 foot wide alleyway located within Block 15, Plat "J", Salt Lake City Survey, Salt Lake
Base & Meridian; Being described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest corner of lot 17, Block 15, Plat "J" Salt Lake City Survey; and running thence
South 00°00'47" East 150.00 feet, more or less along the east line of an existing alleyway to a point on
the Northerly right of way line of Victory Road; thence North 38°37'47" West 32.05 feet along said right
of way line to a point on the west line of an existing alleyway; thence North 00°00'47" West 124.96 feet
along said west line of alleyway; thence North 89°59'13" East 20.00 feet to the point of beginning.
The above described parcel contains 2,750 square feet or 0.06 acre, more or less.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3. Original Petition
4. Mailing List
1. Project Chronology
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
PETITION: PLNPCM2020-00564 - Columbus Street Alley Vacation North
of Victory Road
July 27, 2020 Petition for the alley vacation received by the Salt Lake City
Planning Division
August 3, 2020 Petition assigned to David Gellner, Principal Planner, for staff
analysis and processing.
August 10, 2020 Information about the proposal was sent to the Chair of the Capitol
Hill Neighborhood Council in order to solicit public comments and
start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment
period.
August 11, 2020 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all
residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project
site providing information about the proposal and how to give
public input on the project.
September 28, 2020 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations
ended. No formal comments were submitted to staff by the
recognized organizations to date related to this proposal.
May 13, 2021 Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the
Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting of May
26, 2021. Public hearing notice mailed.
May 13, 2021 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of
the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the
property.
May 26, 2021 The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on May 26, 2021.
The Commission voted unanimously to forward a Positive
recommendation to City Council for the proposed alley vacation.
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2020-00564 - Columbus Street
Alley Vacation North of Victory Road – Nicholas Kanaan, a property owner at 585 N. Columbus
Street and James Carr, a property owner at 583 N. Columbus Street are co -petitioners asking to
vacate an approximately 150-foot long section of platted alley adjacent to their respective
properties. The recorded but completely undeveloped alley segment runs north-south of Victory
Road and abuts a total of five (5) properties owned by four (4) different property owners. The
platted alley north of this appears to have been previously vacated. The proposal is to vacate this
remaining alley segment and incorporate the vacant land into the neighboring properties. The
total area of the proposed vacation is approximately 2750 square feet. The subject alley is located
within Council District 3, represented by Chris Wharton. (Staff contact: David J. Gellner at (385 -
226-3860 or david.gellner@slcgov.com )
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive
comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE:
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b). Please visit
https://www.slc.gov/council/news/featured-news/virtually-attend-city-
council-meetings/ to learn how you can share your comments live during
electronic City Council meetings. If you would like to provide feedback or
comment, via email or phone, please contact us at: 801-535-7654 (24-
Hour comment line) or by email at: council.comments@slcgov.com .
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
David Gellner at 385-226-3860 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday or via e-mail at david.gellner@slcgov.com
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.(P 19-19)
3. Original Petition
,,,
S:lgnatnreh&e
The previous Alley Vacation / Closure Request document was reviewed and
approved by all parties who own land adjacent to the proposed alley vacation/
closure request
The alley is located on a steep sloping hill side that is currently fallow with weeds
and grasses overgrowing it and unused. Due to the steep topography, this alley is
completely unusable and cannot be accessed by a vehicle safely. The alley has never
been in use, and does nothave potential for future use. There are no city structures
or improvements on the alley, and as such it seems there is no utility to keeping this
small plot of land as an alley any longer.
The alley is located off of Victory Road between Ensign St and Columbus St and has
width of 20', length on West of127.5', length on East of 150', and a total area of
2612.5 square feet (please see attached SIDWELL and PLAT maps.
Keri HoUand t,,fV r.alumbus 101-023
First Name Last Name n Date Address Parcel
• I
l ---sss""fJ.Colµalbus St. 7 I 60 Norris & G Yaldine
11 1031 Gary bd Family
l'I
T""
589 N. Columbus St.
6 17 Keri Holland 0
1 101023 LO
585 N. Columbus St. 18 DocProperties 0
Nicholas Kanaan LO
101024 7- 583 N. Columbus St.
9p.t.
19 James & Debbie Carr 0
101025 LO
20 0
I . - ,..
I ,
Aney Vacation/ Closure Request
ID
101026
1
1...,
20' Wide, 127.S "!a_ t Length, 150' East Length
1 0
101027 LO
0
LO 7 102012
0
LO 6
0
LO 5
102013
I
l
102014
I l ·,
I
'
g 4 102015
I
J
i
!
0
LO 3 102016
I
0
LO 2 10201i
g
.. ..
..
..
1,•• ..,-
[... .
t'
-- .......................
--
l '
.• .t :,,
- . ..-
i I
...10
.-.-
I ' -
...
I • -,
I-
< 'I •
.•• u II.
--
" >-
• " UI ·>-
I :::,
'·,"4'-
I '
.•.• -I-
I •
,w
t I "'-'
'G!Llk'--........
....-:,.-n.-•.,.·....-...-..
-•Id...
W 1/2 NW 1/4 Sec 31 TIN RIE
SALT LAKECOlJNTY. UTAH
09-31-11
_ ,_a:
.
.
\.
1-._
'(,·
.
t"'cor i , .., ti
4. Mailing List
OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP
MARK R MILLIGAN; JENNIFER M MILLIGAN (JT) 580 N WESTCAPITOL ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MARTIN I STEINBERG; MARGARET CHANDLER (JT) 576 N WESTCAPITOL ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
AMELIA K MATHISON 42 W GIRARD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 36 W GIRARD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CAPITOL VIEW PROPERTIES, LLC 1559 W 3860 S WEST VALLEY UT 84119
599 NORTH DARWIN, LLC 672 E UNION SQ SANDY UT 84070
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 579 N DARWIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ED ISABELLE 30 W GIRARD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KELLI A FRAME 28 W GIRARD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
STEVEN B BOYINGTON; STUART N STONE (JT) 633 N VICTORY RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
RALPH W PATTERSON; JODI A PATTERSON (JT) 554 N WESTCAPITOL ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ZAFFIRO PROPERTIES LLC 141 ASPEN DALE WY SW CALGARY, ALBE TA T3H0R
GIRARD PROPERTIES UT, LLC 65 W 700 N BOUNTIFUL UT 84010
NORRIS W FAMILY GOOLD; TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 595 N COLUMBUS ST # B SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CHRISTOPHER LEE 655 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
651 COLUMBUS, LLC 651 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KERI LYNNE HOLLAND 589 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DOCPROPERTIES, LLC 585 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DEBBIE A CARR; JAMES A CARR (JT) 583 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
S REV TRUST 1169 E 5290 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117
SHAWN CLAY; CORIN J CLAY (JT) 563 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DANIEL A HERSHKOWITZ; ALYSSA M HERSHKOWITZ (JT) 135 S LAKE MERCED HILL SAN FRANCISCO CA 94132
MARK T WOOD 12861 VIAVISTA DEL PASADO ORO VALLEY AZ 85755
GALEN C BAGLEY; LESLEY H BAGLEY (JT) 642 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
FABERT PROPERTIES, LLC 6914 S 2160 W WEST JORDAN UT 84084
G WILKING PROPERTIES, LLC 1610 E DEAUVILLE AVE MURRAY UT 84121
ERIC J YOUSSEFI 612 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 2560 VIA ANITA PLS VRDS EST CA 90274
CLEMENS A LANDAU; JOANNA E LANDAU (JT) 600 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KEVIN M MACK; HEIDI D RISTER (TC) 594 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
FOSTER/MAZZOLINI FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 12/18/2018 588 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MATTHEW V WENNER; JODY L WENNER (JT) 582 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PATRICIA C OGDEN; PATRICK R OGDEN (JT) 576 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BRAEWICK, PROPERTIES LLC 142 E BRAEWICK RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JOHN HOWA 564 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MICHAEL S HATCH 617 N DESOTO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
FRED S IV EDWARDS 611 N DESOTO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RICHARD M BROWN; SHEILA BROWN (JT) 605 N DESOTO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ALAN L OKAWA; ALLISON OKI (JT) 599 N DESOTO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LARRY L FRY; SHAWN E FRY (JT) 593 N DESOTO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LAURA L ARELLANO 587 N DESOTO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JOHN GEOFFREY FITZWILLIAM; MELANIE GALL FITZWILLIAM (JT) 581 N DESOTO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RICHARD D OLSEN 575 N DESOTO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CHARLES P MORGAN; PETER J MORGAN (JT) 571 N DESOTO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
STERLING S HOLDEN; MIA M HOLDEN (JT) 31 E GIRARD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
AF RENT LLC 1361 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 6852 S HOLLOW MILL DR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121
TANYA F BARRON 743 23RD ST APT 1F OGDEN UT 84401
LINDA SMITH‐HUNTER 1319 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
WEST GIRARD APARTMENTS LLC PO BOX 712416 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84171
JEREMIAH P JOHNSON; DEBORAH L JOHNSON (JT) 1029 N MAIN ST FARMINGTON UT 84025
NICOLE CHRISTINE ZAATAR 3 W GIRARD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LELAND B SWANSON; JOANN B SWANSON (JT) 545 N DARWIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 558 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
EJAELA2 LLC 548 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DANIEL EYLAN; MI OLSZEWSKA (JT) 546 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TODD ANDREWS; CATHERINE OSBORNE (JT) 559 N DESOTO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
Current Occupant 660 N VICTORY RD Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 580 N WEST CAPITOL ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 578 N WEST CAPITOL ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 576 N WEST CAPITOL ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 610 N WEST CAPITOL ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 599 N DARWIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 620 N VICTORY RD Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 554 N WEST CAPITOL ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 49 W GIRARD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 57 W GIRARD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 665 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 605 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 600 N VICTORY RD Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 590 N VICTORY RD Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 605 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 599 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 573 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 595 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 611 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 613 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 623 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 559 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 636 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 632 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 608 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 570 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 617 N DE SOTO ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 611 N DE SOTO ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 605 N DE SOTO ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 599 N DE SOTO ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 593 N DE SOTO ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 587 N DE SOTO ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 581 N DE SOTO ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 575 N DE SOTO ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 571 N DE SOTO ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 635 N DE SOTO ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 631 N DE SOTO ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 616 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 614 N COLUMBUS ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 26 W GIRARD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 41 W GIRARD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 37 W GIRARD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 559 N DE SOTO ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Salt Lake City Planning ‐ David Gellner PO BOX 145480 Salt Lake City UT 84114
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Ben Luedtke, Sylvia Richards,
Allison Rowland, and Kira Luke
Budget and Policy Analysts
DATE:November 9, 2021
RE: Budget Amendment Number Four FY2022
________________________________________________________________________________
Budget Amendment Number Four includes forty-one proposed amendments and requested changes to thirteen
funds. Total expenditures coming from Fund Balance are $2,884,735, and the Administration is requesting straw
polls for two items which are found in Section A (New Budget Items). Additionally, the Council may wish to note
that the Administration is proposing to add twenty-two ongoing FTE’s paid with one-time grant funding. If all the
items are adopted as proposed, then Fund Balance would be $502,894 below the 13% minimum target established
by the Council in FY 20. Fund Balance would however remain $3 million above 12%.
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Proposed Spending Items
There are several proposed items that would spend nearly $14.5 million of American Rescue Plan Act or ARPA
funding. This is one-time funding from the Federal Government for the City to respond to pandemic-related
impacts and address recovery needs including revenue loss replacement and employee compensation. Many of the
proposed ARPA-funded items would use one-time funding for one-time uses. However, a few items like the park
ranger pilot program and expanded Community Commitment Program would add new full-time employees (FTEs)
which create new ongoing costs. This is in addition to ongoing costs (FTEs/programs) paid for with ARPA dollars in
the F22 budget, totaling approximately $22.3 million. These would add to the General Fund’s growing structural
budget deficit in future fiscal years.
It’s important to note that approving the items as proposed would also set in motion the need to spend ARPA
dollars in FY23 (or use another funding source or identify budget cuts) to cover some of the new ongoing costs
particularly new FTEs and ongoing police overtime. The Administration’s transmittal includes a summary
spreadsheet showing how the City’s entire $85 million ARPA award has been used to-date, items proposed in this
budget amendment and potential uses in FY23 and FY24. The Council may wish to discuss with the
Administration how the City’s FY23 and FY24 annual budgets could be impacted by ARPA-funded
items proposed in this budget amendment plus the $22.3 million of ongoing expenses in the FY22
annual budget paid for with one-time ARPA funding.
Sales Tax Update (See Attachment 1)
This attachment shows the confirmed sales tax revenues through the end of FY21. The data table shows sales tax in
FY21 was $7.4 million higher than FY20 particularly the months of February through June. June was the highest
sales tax revenue month on record for the City. The wholesale trade increased, and the biggest decline remains
accommodation and food services. Inflation could also be a contributing factor to greater sales tax receipts.
Project Timeline:
Set Date: Nov. 9, 2021
1st Briefing: Nov. 9, 2021
2nd Briefing: Nov. 16, 2021
Public Hearing: Nov. 16, 2021
3rd Briefing: December 7, 2021 (if needed)
Potential Action: December 7, 2021
Page | 2
Revenue for FY 2021-22 Budget Adjustments
Because the fiscal year just started the Fiscal Year 2022 projections are at budget. The following chart shows a
current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2022. Updated revenue projections are expected to be
available for the next budget amendment and after the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is completed.
Page | 3
Fund Balance Update
The Administration is recommending to go below the 13% minimum target established by the Council in FY 20.
This means the Fund Balance would be $502,894 below the target. Fund Balance would however remain $3 million
above 12%. Previously the City has been advised that downward trends in fund balance percentage could have the
potential to impact the City’s bond rating (needed to get desirable interest rates), and the previous minimum
threshold was identified at 10%. Updated Fund Balance projections are expected to be available for the next budget
amendment and after the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is completed.
Impact Fees Update
The Administration provided a summary of impact fee tracking, details on refunding amounts and dates and lists of
unfinished projects with impact fee funding. The information is current as of October 29, 2021. An update since the
information was transmitted is that the four police impact fee refunds listed for July through October in FY22 are
not needed based on the adopted annual budget.
As a result, the City is on-track with impact fee budgeting to have no refunds during all FY22.
The Administration reports work is nearing completion to update the fire and parks sections of the impact fee plan.
The transportation section was updated last year. Eligible projects for police impact fees are being identified.
Page | 4
Type Unallocated Cash
“Available to Spend”Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring
Impact Fees
Fire $1,487,183 More than a year away -
Parks $8,948,216 More than a year away -
Police $415,503 More than a year away -
Transportation $6,101,644 More than a year away -
Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract
$1,583,500 ARPA Holding Account Update
In the FY22 annual budget, the Council placed $1,583,500 into a holding account from 10 items proposed by the
Administration. The Administration indicates that the holding account items are no longer being recommended.
During deliberations in May and June the 10 items were determined to not be eligible for ARPA funding under the
U.S. Treasury’s ARPA guidance. The holding account was created to give the Administration time for exploring
whether any of the 10 items could be modified to be ARPA eligible. The Council could act in this budget
amendment to free these dollars.
Section A: New Items
(note: to expedite the processing of this staff report, staff has included the Administration’s descriptions from the
transmittal for some of these items)
A-1: Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs ($128,888 from General Fund Balance and
$294,820 from Enterprise Funds)
The City has carried both excess liability and cyber security insurance since Fiscal Year 17 (FY17) and has not yet
had to use either. However, premiums for each rose significantly higher than budgeted in the current fiscal year.
Excess liability
The Administration shared the following definition of excess liability insurance:
Excess liability insurance covers judgments and claim settlements in excess of the City's $1,000,000 self-insured
retention. While most claims against the City are subject to judgment limitations under the Governmental
Immunity Act, federal claims, such as civil rights and employment claims, are not.
The Administration attributes the increase to claims in the past year that met thresholds the City is required to
report to the City’s insurance carrier.
Cyber security
The Administration shared the following definition of cyber security insurance:
Cyber insurance covers third-party liability resulting from security breaches. It also covers data recovery, data
breach response and crisis management, cyber-extortion, and ransomware.
In recent years, the City has funded upgraded security resources, including more advanced systems and more
cybersecurity training for City staff. The FY22 budget for the IMS Department also included $50,000 for an audit of
the City’s current network security. Requests in future budgets are likely to continue including hardware and
software upgrades that will improve security, as the City works to keep up with rapidly-advancing technology and
increasing threats. Although these investments ultimately reduce the need to use the insurance, trade publications
for the municipal information technology sector report a large increase in cyberattacks across the board, leading to
higher premiums throughout the industry.
Policy Question: The Council could confirm with the City Attorney's office whether an executive session on
deployment of security and/or pending litigation could allow the Council to learn about any current claims and
the City’s security profile.
A-2: Department of Air Quality Lawnmower Exchange ($250,000 from General Fund Balance)
The Utah Department of Air Quality (UDAQ) administers an annual gas-powered lawnmower and yard equipment
exchange in order to reduce criteria pollutants in the areas of the Wasatch Front that are in non-attainment with the
Clean Air Act air quality standards. Because the Wasatch Front is on track for attainment of wintertime PM2.5,
Page | 5
UDAQ is not running a snowblower exchange this year. Instead, they are focusing on programs to reduce
summertime ozone pollution, for which the Wasatch Front is out of attainment. UDAQ has $900,000 set aside to
continue the exchanges for the foreseeable future. The size of the lawnmower exchange varies each year depending
on the size of financial contributions from partners. UDAQ typically contributes between $300,000 and $400,000.
The Sustainability Department is proposing a budget amendment of $250,000 from General Fund Balance to
partner with UDAQ in FY22 on a gas-powered lawnmower exchange. This would facilitate exchanges for
approximately 1,000 Salt Lake City residents. Salt Lake City participated in 2021, spending nearly $161,000 which
helped 582 residents participate. In total, 509 gas powered mowers were exchanged (the remaining participants
bought new mowers without exchanging an old one). This is the equivalent of removing 4.02 tons of pollution from
the airshed each year. A majority of residents also opted to participate in the City’s Call 2 Haul program to have
their gas mower picked up curbside and recycled by Salt Lake City Waste and Recycling.
The Administration proposes continuing this program in FY 22 (spring 2022). The goal will be to increase
participation from 582 to 1,000 with a continued focus on our Westside neighborhoods. The Administration
anticipates greater awareness and uptake of the program in the coming year due to increased familiarity with the
program, and plans to work with UDAQ on earlier, targeted outreach given the lessons learned from spring 2021.
UDAQ anticipates the program logistics will change in FY 22 to facilitate easier participation and lower
administrative burden. In particular, they are hoping to develop a phone app that participants will use to sign up
and upload any required receipts.
UDAQ is also envisioning the next program will offer a promotional discount code to be used toward the purchase
of electric lawn equipment and an app would also help separate Salt Lake City residents from other participating
Wasatch Front residents. This will reduce confusion as to who is eligible for curbside pickup of their old mowers.
The Administration also indicates that they also hope the app will help keep the exchange open longer for Salt Lake
City residents instead of opening, closing it, and opening it again while UDAQ verifies addresses.
While the exact amount of the discounts have yet to be determined, the Sustainability Department proposes using
$250,000 in City General Funds to facilitate approximately 1,000 gas-powered mower exchanges. This budget
amendment would also fund temporary staffing expenses to assist with running curbside collection of old mowers
through Call 2 Haul. This benefit was very popular last year and helped make this program more equitable to those
who might not have the ability to haul their own mower to a metal recycler.
Policy Questions:
Expanding Program Beyond Lawnmowers – Council Members recently expressed interest in expanding this
exchange to include other common gas-powered yard maintenance equipment like leaf blowers, chainsaws,
trimmers, etc. The Council may wish to ask the Administration what would be necessary to expand the
exchange program along these lines?
Sustainability Funding Contributions – The Council may wish to ask if the Sustainability Department’s
refuse, energy, or environment dollars could be available to contribute to this program?
Context with the Annual budget – Given that this program is proposed to be funded with General Fund
dollars, the Council could ask that it be included in the annual budget in future years.
A-3: COVID Safe Building Improvements ($844,000 from General Fund Balance; $131,000 goes to
IMS Fund)
The Public Services Department identified several recommended building improvements to provide a safer
environment protecting against the spread of disease. Consultants, health officials and current employees
collaborated to identify these changes. The total cost is estimated at $844,000 and includes the following:
- $250,000 for improved indoor air quality by upgrading existing HVAC systems to better capture airborne
particles and contaminants using needlepoint devices
- $165,000 for enhanced janitorial cleaning five days a week for the rest of the fiscal year. The cleaning
schedule would adjust to COVID case counts and feedback from the public and employees
Page | 6
- $131,000 for teleconferencing and meeting equipment for virtual and hybrid public meetings. This
equipment and training would be available to the Mayor’s Office, Council Office and the City’s two dozen
boards and commissions
- $100,000 for reconfiguring cubicle office spaces
- $100,000 for various personal protective equipment (PPE) and cleaning supplies including facemasks,
hand sanitizer, disposable gloves, etc.
- $44,000 for new chairs, tables, reconfigurations and small digital signs in meeting rooms (potentially
including Room 138, Cannon Room and others)
- $17,000 for one seasonal employee working 40 hours/week for six months except holidays to assist with
visitors to the City & County Building
- $16,000 for new chairs in the Committee of the Whole room
- $10,000 for a public noticing digital sign within the ADA entrance at the City & County Building and at
Plaza 349
- $6,000 for desks and chairs to create two check-in areas: one on the first floor between elevators, a second
near the east entrance
o CBI guards would cover the check-in desk as part of the City’s existing contract
o Procedures are being developed for this new function
- $5,000 for appointment management software at the entrance of the building which allows IDing and
monitoring building occupancy
Policy Questions:
Equipment for Hybrid Meetings – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what virtual and hybrid
meeting equipment and training would be made available to the City’s two dozen boards and commissions.
The Council may also wish to ask if the Administration has looked into providing hybrid meeting training to
community councils.
Public Access to City & County Building – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if a policy is
being developed to govern public access during the pandemic to the City & County Building and how the
public would make appointments on the new management software. Currently some departments report
offering limited hours for walk-in visitors and other departments are scheduling appointments.
Public Notice Digital Signs – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if public noticing digital signs
are also needed at the Main Library and the Public Safety Building so the same information is available at
multiple locations across the Civic Campus. Many notices are currently posted on doors with paper.
Other Funding Sources for this Project – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if ARPA dollars
could be used for these expenses (note: this is not recommended for ARPA dollar use by the
Administration).
A-4: Pulled prior to Submission
A-5: Community Health Access Team (CHAT) Program Vehicles ($150,000 from $2 Million Holding
Account; $150,000 goes to Fleet Fund) *straw poll requested*
Note this item is related to items A-10 and C-1
In the FY22 annual budget, the Council created a holding account with just over $2 million from “Funding our
Future” public safety dollars, for diversifying public safety civilian response models. This item is requesting
$150,000 which would be the first use of that holding account. Note that the Council carried over into FY22 a
separate almost $2.3 million holding account originally created in FY21 for implementing recommendations from
the Racial Equity in Policing Commission, the Council’s audit of the Police Department, and the public.
The $150,000 would purchase three new hybrid Ford Explorer SUVs to accommodate increased program staffing.
Two of the vehicles will be used by CHAT staff and the third by the Medical Division in the Fire Department
supporting the program. The estimated cost per vehicle is $50,000 including fuel, upgrades, and maintenance.
The CHAT program currently has one vehicle for two paramedics responding as a team. The program is overseen by
a captain. Item A-10 proposes transferring three social worker FTEs from the Police Department to the Fire
Department. This staffing increase and corresponding vehicle increase would allow the CHAT program to operate
Page | 7
two separate teams. The social workers in the CHAT Program would operate out of the Public Safety Building rather
than the Community Connections Center. The Administration stated the CHAT Program would operate
independent of the Social Worker Program.
The paramedic would assess a subject’s medical condition and the social worker would assess their psychological
condition. The Fire Department responds to approximately 24,000 medical assessment calls annually. If the CHAT
program provides better response options to this frequent call type, then the Fire Department may seek to further
expand the program in the future. The Fire Department and 911 Department presented the expanded CHAT
program proposal to the REP Commission in September which was supportive of this proposal.
An expanded CHAT program with the added skillsets of social workers would respond to calls related to mental
health and homelessness. Some call types are ineligible for CHAT program response including when a weapon is
present or there are threats of violence. This has the potential to divert some calls away from a law enforcement
response so police officers could address other calls for service. The Administration stated the CHAT program
responds to calls for service that (1) do not meet the criteria for emergency service or (2) do not benefit from the
scope of training provided to paramedics and EMTs
Policy Questions:
Identifying and Tracking Calls for Service Diversions from Police to CHAT Program – The Council may
wish to ask the Administration if there are plans to track calls for service diverted from a police officer
response to the CHAT program or other alternative response models. The information could help measure
the success and demand for the City’s civilian response models. The Council may also wish to ask how the
911 Department identifies calls for service that are good candidates for diversion. The City’s alternative
response options include the CHAT program, Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) and the Social Worker
Program (potentially a new Park Ranger program and police civilian responder program too).
Equity in Access to Medical and Mental Health Services – The Council may wish to ask the Administration
how an expanded CHAT program could improve access to medical and mental health services, especially in
communities that historically have disproportionately less access.
Aligning Operating Hours to Mental Health Crisis Call Times – The Council’s operational audit of the Police
Department recommended social worker program and Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) hours change to
include evenings. The Council may wish to ask the Administration if an expanded CHAT program would
have operating hours in the evening. The auditors provided the below graphics showing most mental
health-related calls occur in the evening which is outside the CIT program’s operating hours.
Mental Health-related Calls for Service by Hour of the Day
Page | 8
Straw Poll Request: Does the Council wish to hold a straw poll for this item? The Administration has requested a
straw poll given the significant delays in receiving vehicle orders during pandemic-related supply shortages.
A-6: Non-Represented Employees’ Job Salary Survey ($75,000 from General Fund Balance)
*straw poll requested*
This request is intended for consultative services to be provided by a qualified third-party consultant or firm to
conduct a compensation survey to assess, evaluate and compare the overall pay structure, including actual base pay
and other job elements, of Salt Lake City’s non-represented employees to other public and private sector entities
with whom the City competes for talent. The recommended survey project includes data collection, analysis, and the
development and presentation of a report with recommendations for the City’s Department of Human Resources,
Citizens Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC), and elected officials to consider. The survey will be conducted
with a primary focus on cash compensation and rely on the same caliber and methodology as surveys previously
completed for the City's public safety and AFSCME-covered employee groups (as completed by Mercer in early 2019
and 2020, respectively).
Straw Poll Request: Does the Council wish to hold a straw poll for this item? The Administration has requested a
straw poll to allow additional time for selecting a consultant, allowing the CCAC to review at a special meeting in
the spring, and so that results might be available to inform the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for FY2023.
A-7: Sugar House Special Assessment Area Analysis (SAA) ($60,000 from General Fund Balance)
In June, the Sugar House Community Council wrote a letter to the Economic Development Department requesting
the City explore an SAA for economic promotion in the business district. The only existing economic promotion
SAA in the City is for the Downtown. Utah Code defines eligible economic promotion activities as “sponsoring
festivals and markets, promoting business investment or activities, helping to coordinate public and private actions,
and developing and issuing publications designed to improve the economic well-being of the commercial area.”
(Utah Code 11-42-102 Section 19)
The $60,000 of funding would allow the Department to hire consultants and bond counsel to determine specific
rates and revenue estimates, impacted parcels, cost per property owner, legal description of the boundaries and
draft the notice of intent to designate. There is a potential for the assessment to reimburse the General Fund for
those upfront costs.
Page | 9
There is some flexibility in what method is used to measure the assessment such as property frontage, property
area, taxable value or a combination of these. The Council would need to adopt a resolution designating the rates,
budgets, allowable uses and boundaries. An RFP would be issued to accept bids of interested organizations. The
Sugar House Chamber may submit a bid. A letter would also be sent to all impacted property owners notifying them
of the SAA process. An SAA requires support from at least 61% of property owners (not tenants / businesses leasing
space) and periodic approval such as every three years for the Downtown SAA.
Policy Questions:
SAA Activities – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration what activities the new SAA
would provide. For example, would an ambassador program be paid for like in the Downtown, North
Temple, and Central Ninth/Ballpark areas?
SAA Reimburse General Fund Balance – The Council may wish to request the Administration include
reimbursement of the General Fund Balance for upfront costs be included in the SAA analysis.
SAA Boundaries – The Council may wish to discuss whether to support the potential boundaries or if
adjustments should be considered. For example, should the residential neighborhood north and south of
Simpson Avenue be included when the SAA is focused on commercial areas and economic promotion?
Council staff created the below map to show the potential boundaries. Note: once notices are sent it is very
expensive to change boundaries, and may cause additional delays.
Context with Annual Budget - Given that this is a new proposal to be funded with General Fund dollars, the
Council could ask that it be evaluated in the context of the annual budget rather than a budget amendment.
Approximate Potential Boundaries for Sugar House SAA
700 East; Interstate 80; 1300 East;
Hollywood Avenue with extension north on 1100 East to Ramona Ave to 1200 East
Page | 10
A-8: Sorenson Impact Center Social Investment Study – Phase 2 Funding – ($150,000 from General
Fund Balance)
The Administration is requesting $150,000 from General Fund balance to continue the contract with the Sorenson
Impact Center to work on Phase 2 of a Social Impact Investment study. A separate agenda item and staff report is
planned for the larger scope of this topic. The Council may discuss adding the following principles/conditions in
considering allocating the funding for the phase 2 work (note: this may change given the discussion during that
agenda item):
- The Council allocates $150,000 in Budget Amendment #4, for the Sorenson Impact Center to continue
work on this potential program, with the understanding that:
o The goal of the program is generational change, and in order to do that it must be ongoing beyond
the initial investment term.
o The City’s investment will not supplant existing programs and funding, and that assurances are
obtained from partner agencies that this understanding will continue for the duration of any
program created with this seed money.
o The Sorenson Impact Center engage the totality of groups that provide these services and conduct
transparent evaluation processes to determine which partners are best positioned to deliver this
long-term generational change.
o There be strict and transparent metrics to show goals are reached, particularly that the opportunity
index score is improving in areas where it currently lags.
A-9: Pulled prior to Submission
A-10: Community Health Access Team (CHAT) Program Personnel Transfer (Budget Neutral)
Note this item is related to items A-5 and C-1
This item would transfer three FTEs from the Police Department to the Fire Department including two social
workers and one case manager that is a licensed clinical social worker. See A-5 for the full write-up.
A-11: Rose Park Golf Course Water & Energy Efficiency Grant (Matching Funds) ($1,800,000 from
the Golf Fund) *straw poll requested*
The Departments of Public Lands and Public Utilities are working together on a grant application to help fund
installation of an updated landscape irrigation system and other water conservation measures at Rose Park Golf
Course. The grant is sponsored by the federal Bureau of Reclamation and would total $1,889,371. Salt Lake City’s
match for the grant would consist of the following:
Cash
Staff
Labor
Contracted
Services
Department of Public Lands | Golf Division $1,800,000 $61,023 $0
Department of Public Utilities $0 $21,348 $7,000
Subtotal $1,800,000 $82,371 $7,000
Total City Cost-Share $1,889,371
The resulting $3,778,742 would be used to replace the existing irrigation system with new equipment, including
high-efficiency nozzles that allow the watering levels to match turf type. In addition, some areas of fairway grass,
which requires a lot of water, will be removed and re-seeded with drought-tolerant grasses, and the square footage
of out-of-bounds rough areas will increase. The Golf Division estimates that Rose Park’s total irrigated areas can be
reduced by 25% this way without impacting play, leading to significant water savings and furthering the goal of this
grant funding. Note that these changes are distinct from those begun in 2015, under a contract with Siemens, in
which a process was developed and implemented to draw secondary water from the Jordan River. That work
included a new storage vault, pump system and some existing head upgrades, while this grant and the City’s match
would fund the irrigation system itself, as well as the turf changes.
In response to a Council staff question about the potential to access Bureau of Reclamation funds for similar
projects at the City’s other courses, the Golf Division identified two limits:
Page | 11
1.the challenges the Division faces with setting aside large amounts for matching funds; and
2.the level of competition for these grants. They believe that Rose Park is a particularly attractive candidate
for these funds because of the potential to shift such a large share of fairway turf to be drought tolerant. The
three other courses the Division reports as needing irrigation system replacements are Mountain Dell,
Nibley and Forest Dale. Bonneville and Glendale were upgraded as part of the 2015 Siemens contract.
Straw Poll Request: Does the Council wish to hold a straw poll for this item? The Administration has requested a
straw poll given the timing of the expected grant award and when the City would need to confirm acceptance if
the application is successful.
A-12: Public Lands Park Ranger Pilot Program ($1,577,291 from General Fund Balance; $195,720
goes to Fleet Fund; $69,247 from ARPA)
Note: this item is related to items C-1, E-3 and E-4
The Administration is proposing creation of a pilot program with 19 new FTEs in the Public Lands Department
including two sergeants, 16 rangers and one support position. The total annual cost for a sergeant is estimated at
$138,787 and for a ranger is estimated at $111,400. Job descriptions for the two positions were pending at the time
of publishing this staff report. The Administration stated 12 rangers would be needed at a minimum to launch this
new pilot program. The 19 FTEs are being recommended for a larger program.
The program would operate from 8am to midnight seven days a week. The Administration states the rangers may
serve as law enforcement officers. However, rangers would be unarmed and unlike police officers would not be
Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) certified. Rangers would operate out of existing City facilities in parks
including the soon to be redeveloped Fisher Mansion Carriage House and possibly temporary trailers. Rangers
would focus on the Jordan River Trail, Pioneer Park, Liberty Park, and Fairmont Park. Rangers are not expected to
operate in the Foothills or outlying natural areas.
The total annual cost is estimated at $2,350,983. The request before the Council is for a half year funding of
$1,175,491 and $401,800 of one-time costs including three trucks and two light response vehicles. The total cost for
the remainder of FY22 is estimated at $1,577,291.
The nearly $1.6 million cost in FY22 is proposed to be paid for from General Fund Balance. This item also proposes
a reimbursement to Fund Balance for salary restorations resulting from the FY21 hiring freeze. ARPA dollars would
provide $1,508,044 to Fund Balance as flexible General Fund dollars available for any use. This is the maximum
salary restoration amount allowed under U.S. Treasury guidance. The remaining gap of $69,247 would come
directly from ARPA for eligible supplies and services such as homeless outreach.
The salary restoration using ARPA dollars in FY23 is estimated at $1,545,746 which creates a funding gap of
$805,237 compared to the program’s annual cost. Creation of this new ongoing pilot program and the limited
available use of one-time ARPA dollars means the structural deficit in the annual budget could be larger in FY23.
The Public Lands Department (formerly Parks Division within Public Services Department) previously paid for
police officer overtime in parks. The table below summarizes these costs from recent fiscal years.
Fiscal Year Police Officer Overtime Cost Notes
FY2018 $63,226 Overtime was paid over a four month period
FY2019 $226,569 Overtime was paid over a seven month period
FY2020 $23,835 Prolonged reduced staffing of police officers resulted in
significantly reduced overtime in parks
FY2021 $9,738 Prolonged reduced staffing of police officers resulted in
significantly reduced overtime in parks
FY2022 $0 Private security firm used to lock park restrooms at
night and provide park security patrols
The pilot program’s purpose and goals include:
- Serving as law enforcement officers in parks (not POST-certified like police officers)
Page | 12
- Providing services and information to park users
- Assisting with homeless outreach efforts
- Making people feel welcome and safe in parks
- Deterring inappropriate activity
- Gaining voluntary compliance of park codes and rules
- Reducing the number of annual vandalism incidents and associated costs for repair/replacement
Policy Questions:
Effectiveness of Civilian Rangers Addressing Criminal Issues in Parks – The Council may wish to discuss
with the Administration the limits of civilian park rangers addressing criminal issues in parks and when
rangers would need to rely on a police officer response. The Administration states the rangers may serve as
law enforcement officers but would not be POST-certified like police officers. The Council may also wish to
ask the Administration how park rangers would coordinate with the Police Department’s parks bike squad.
Private Security Guards in Parks – The Public Lands Department currently hires private security guards to
lock restrooms in parks and provide security patrols. The Council may wish to ask the Administration for
the pros and cons of creating a park ranger program instead of continuing the current practice of hiring
private security guards.
Identifying and Tracking Calls for Service Diversions from Police to CHAT Program – The Council may
wish to ask the Administration if there are plans to track calls for service diverted from a police officer
response to park rangers or other alternative response models. The information could help measure the
success and demand for the City’s civilian response models. The Council may also wish to ask how the 911
Department identifies calls for service that are good candidates for diversion. The City’s alternative
response options include the CHAT program, Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) and the Social Worker
Program (potentially this new Park Ranger program and police civilian responder program too).
Growing Structural Deficit for FY23 Budget – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to provide a
mid-year briefing on the estimated structural deficit for FY23 and how ARPA funding this fiscal year creates
ongoing costs that could need ARPA funding next fiscal year.
Request REP Commission Review – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to present the park
ranger proposal to the REP Commission and share feedback and recommendations.
Training and Equipment for Park Rangers – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what training
and equipment would be provided to park rangers. The rangers would not have firearms.
Reviewing Staffing Level – The Council may wish to ask the Administration when and how the pilot
program’s staffing level will be reviewed to determine if fewer or more positions are warranted to meet the
level of community need.
A-13: WITHDRAWN BY THE ADMINISTRATION
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section
(None)
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section
C-1: ARPA Funding – Public Safety and Homeless Outreach – Public Lands Park Ranger Program
($1,064,368 – Miscellaneous Grants) (See Items A-12, E-3 and E-4.)
Note: this item is related to items A-12, E-3 and E-4. See item A-12 for the full write-up. This item is an accounting
step for transferring funding to the General Fund.
C-2: Community Commitment Program Rapid Intervention Team ($164,750 from ARPA)
Note: this item is related to items E-5, E-6 and E-8
The Administration is requesting the Council approve three new FTEs to work in the Waste & Recycling Division of
the Sustainability Department. The employees would provide a new City cleaning team working with Advantage
Page | 13
Services and the Homeless Engagement and Response Team coordinator in CAN. Sometimes employees in the
Public Services and Sustainability departments are diverted from regular duties to assist the Community
Commitment Program and Health Department.
The titles and job descriptions for the three new FTEs were pending at the time of publishing this staff report. The
total annual estimated cost per FTE is $87,600 which would be $262,800 for a full fiscal year. This item is
requesting $164,750 to provide seven and a half months of funding in FY22.
The three FTEs would be listed on the grant-funded section of the staffing document. As with the park ranger
program in earlier items, these new FTEs could add to the structural budget deficit by using one-time funding for a
new ongoing cost.
Policy Questions:
Three New FTEs Sunsetting with ARPA – The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether the
three new FTEs would sunset with ARPA funding availability.
Staffing Level and Community Need – the Council may wish to discuss with the Administration if the three
additional FTEs would meet the level of need in the community and maximize the City’s partnership with
the County Health Department.
CAN Supervising Sustainability Employees – The Council may wish to ask why the three new employees
would be in the Waste & Recycling Division of Sustainability but be coordinated by a supervisor in CAN?
Section D: Housekeeping
D-1: Economic Development Loan Fund Move Housing ($100,000 – Housing and $100,000 –
General Fund)
Last March, in Budget Amendment #7 of FY21, the Administration requested, and the Council approved, a
$100,000 appropriation to the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF) to assist restaurants and bars by
offering funding to expand outdoor dining as an aid to pandemic recovery. The Department of Economic
Development (DED) stated at that time that its intent in using the EDLF was to ensure that funding would not lapse
due to delays caused by the processes of program development and identification of recipients. As it turned out,
DED did not distribute any of these funds because “forgivable loans are not permitted under the EDLF Loan
guidelines.” Now the Department is requesting the funds be moved from EDLF to a separate account so that these
funds may be distributed as grants, rather than loans.
If the Council chooses to do so, DED would transmit a resolution for consideration to set the guidelines for the
proposed Outdoor Business Activity Grant Program. The program would provide up to $5,000 for outdoor
dining/retail costs or $10,000 for costs incurred in hosting an “Open Streets” event.
The Department noted in the BA #7 discussions that they would prioritize areas of the City using “social justice
datasets,” and reach out directly to businesses located within these areas, as well as work with the diverse Chambers
of Commerce, Community Councils, and other community partners. Since that time, the City’s Chief Equity Officer
has been named and is working on frameworks and measurements to be implemented Citywide. In the meantime,
the Chief Equity Officer provided DED the GARE (Government Alliance on Race and Equity) Racial Equity Toolkit,
and DED is using that framework in all new project creation, including this project.
Policy Question: Would the Council like to consider its support for this program now or after more specific
guidelines are proposed by the Department? If these funds stay in the EDLF they will not drop to fund balance.
D-2: Increase Grant Fund ($0.00 – Miscellaneous Grants)
The annual budget proposed funding from the American Recovery Plan Act (ARPA) for revenue replacement.
During budget adoption, the expense was adjusted based on updated grant guidelines. This increased the expense
side of the grant fund, but recognition of the revenue was not included. This request adjusts the revenue side to
recognize the revenue side of the transaction in the Grant Fund. This proposal will bring the Fund into balance in
accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
Page | 14
D-3: Premium Holiday – Other Funds (Refuse, Golf, Fleet and IMs) ($0.00 – Miscellaneous Grants)
The Premium Holiday was submitted with the budget with the transfer from the Insurance Fund, but the transfer
into other funds was not included. This amendment is to balance the inter-fund transfers.
D-4: GPS Housekeeping ($74,600 – General Fund and Fleet Fund)
For FY22 there is an accounting change to put the GPS fees for vehicles in the Fleet budget. We missed the piece to
move the current budgets over to Fleet. Public Services has a budget of $39,203; Public Lands has a budget of
$26,797; and CAN has a budget $8,600 that we need to move to Fleet.
D-5: Signage FTE Correction ($51,847 – General Fund)
In the Mayor's Recommended Budget, an FTE for Signage for the Planning & Ecological Services Division was
initially approved, but later reduced. However, the funding was again inadvertently reduced at the Council level,
thus doubling the reduction. This housekeeping request is to replace the funding that was inadvertently cut from
the Signage budget.
D-6: General Obligation Series 2021A Bonds ($23,400,000 – CIP Fund, and $200,000 – Debt
Service)
In November 2018, voters authorized the issuance of up to $87 million in general obligation bonds to fund street
construction. The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021A will be issued in November 2021 as the third issuance of
the authorization. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the receipt of bond proceeds and the expenditure
budget to pay for construction of the street projects associated with the bonds. It also creates expenditure budget
to pay the costs of issuance for the bonds.
Bond proceeds will be allocated to five project cost centers in Fund 83 and one cost center in Fund 81 for the costs
of issuance associated with the bond. Two cost centers will receive $6,000,000 each for the 200 South Phase 1 & 2
(400 W to 900 E) projects. A third cost center will receive $6,800,000 for the 1100 East (900 S to Warnock Ave)
project. The fourth cost center will receive $1,600,000 for the 300 North (300 W to 1000 W) project. The fifth cost
center will receive $3,000,000 for local streets. The proceeds to pay the costs of issuance associated with the bonds
will be deposited to the debt service cost center in Fund 81.
D-7: Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds Series 2021A ($10,665,000, $10,400,000 and $4,900,000
– Debt Service)
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, were issued in June 2012 for the purpose of replacing the North
Temple Viaduct and improving North Temple Boulevard. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B, were
issued in November 2013 for the purpose of financing a portion of the costs of the Sugarhouse Streetcar and paying
for the portion of various improvements to create a "greenway" within the corridor.
The Series 2012A and 2013B bonds are being refunded with the Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A.
This budget amendment will create the revenue budget for the receipt of bond proceeds and the expenditure budget
to pay off the old bonds and to pay the costs of issuance for the bonds. Two Local Building Authority bonds will also
be refunded by the Series 2021A bonds. This budget amendment creates the budget for the transfer to the LBA to
pay those off. A separate LBA budget amendment is being submitted to create budget for paying off those bonds.
D-8: Budget Carry Forward ($1,175,000 – General Fund)
In the General Fund there were several budgets that did not have encumbrances at the close of fiscal year 2021 the
Administration would request Council approval to roll budget for the projects into fiscal year 2022. The budgets
requested are listed below:
CC CC Name OC OC Description Amount
0900503 Demographer Contract 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $50,000.00
0900925 Financial Risk Assessment 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $100,000.00
0900930 Gentrification Mitigation Study 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $100,000.00
0900705 Washington DC Contract 2324 Special Consultant $75,000.00
0900513 NW Northpoint Plan Airport 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $50,000.00
0900508 Home to Transit Program 2590 Other Expenses $800,000.00
TOTAL $1,175,000.00
Page | 15
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
E-1: COVID-19 Local Assistance Matching Grant Program – New Water Reclamation Facility:
Influent Pump Station and Force Mains (Water and Sewer Infrastructure) ($2 million from ARPA)
See Attachment 2 for the grant memo and Council staff report
The Mayor‘s Administration has submitted a grant application requesting funding of $10 million from the State of
Utah to help fund the construction of the new Influent Pump Station force mains, (a sub-project of the Water
Reclamation Facility), and replace the existing pump station and force mains which are at the end of their service
life. This budget amendment item proposes to set aside $2 million in ARPA funds for the required match. The
Council may wish to note that as part of the grant application, the City has committed a $40 million dollar match
for the grant to increase the competitiveness of the application. According to the Administration, the source of the
match includes the Department of Public Utilities planned utility revenue bond issuances, and the secured loan
through the Federal Water Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act.
E-2: Winter Shelter Support ($1 million from ARPA)
This item would provide $1 million of flexible funding for emergency winter shelter support potentially including
shelter operations. The funding is for winter shelter anywhere in Salt Lake County. U.S. Treasury guidance allows
municipalities to spend outside of city limits and/or pool ARPA funding for regional projects and programs for
eligible activities subject to compliance with reporting requirements and showing a benefit is being received for City
residents proportionate to the ARPA funding amount.
Policy Questions
Funding Winter Shelter Outside or Inside City Limits – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if
the funding would go to a winter shelter outside or inside of city limits.
Hotel/Motel Voucher Flexibility – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if the funding could be
used for hotel/motel vouchers instead of costs related to a winter shelter.
E-3: Public Safety and Homeless Outreach – Salary Restoration – Public Lands Park Ranger
Program (See Items A-12, C-1, and E-4) ($443,677 from ARPA)
Note: this item is related to items A-12, C-1, and E-4. See item A-12 for the full write-up. This item is an accounting
step for transferring funding to the General Fund.
E-4: Public Safety and Homeless Outreach – Public Lands Park Rangers (See Item A-12, C-1 and E-3)
($69,244 from ARPA)
Note: this item is related to items A-12, C-1 and E-3. See item A-12 for the full write-up. This item is an accounting
step for using ARPA to directly fund eligible homeless outreach services and supplies in the new program.
E-5: Community Commitment Program Rapid Intervention Team Vehicles ($160,500 from ARPA)
Note: this item is related to items C-2, E-6 and E-8. See the other items for additional info.
This item would purchase two F-350 pickup trucks and a trailer to be used by the three new employees in Waste
and Recycling as part of the expanded Community Commitment Program.
E-6: Community Commitment Program Additional Police Support ($1,505,920 from ARPA)
Note: this item is related to items C-2, E-6 and E-8
The Administration is requesting $1,505,920 of funding for the Police Department to provide staffing to support the
homeless encampment cleanup and camp re-establishment stabilization as requested by the Salt Lake County
Health Department. Police officers working extra overtime shifts will provide security to ensure the cleanups can
proceed in an environment that will be safe for all involved. Staffing numbers will vary depending on the size,
number of cleanups and the location.
Activity # days Officers # hours Rate Amount Requested
Major Cleanups 14 40 10 $65 $364,000
Minor Cleanups*and area stabilization 122 24 6 $65 $1,141,920
Total Requested $1,505,920
*previously utilized on-duty resources that are no longer available
Page | 16
It’s important to note that these overtime shifts are voluntary and there is no guarantee all shifts will be filled. Prior
overtime shifts for the Community Commitment Program were approximately 75% filled.
As of the October 2, the Police Department had spent $859,460 of the $1,741,890 overtime budget which is 49% of
the available budget. If this trend continues, then the Police Department would be projected to go over the available
overtime budget around mid-fiscal year. The Council increased the ongoing overtime budget by $650,000 as part of
the FY22 annual budget.
Policy Questions:
Total Cost of the Community Commitment Program – The Council may wish to ask the Administration
what is the total cost of the Community Commitment Program if Budget Amendment #4 is approved as
requested? This information was requested and was pending at the time of publishing this staff report.
Area Stabilization Examples – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for examples of area
stabilization outside of immediate cleanup sites.
E-7: Pulled prior to Submission to allow for the completion of Phase 2 of the Social Impact
Investment.
E-8: Community Commitment Program Rapid Intervention Team Cleaning by Advantage Services
($57,000 from ARPA)
Note: this item is related to items C-2, E-5, and E-6
This item would provide $57,000 of additional funding for Advantage Services to conduct cleaning services related
to the Community Commitment Program.
Policy Questions:
Public and/or Private Property Cleaning – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if Advantage
Services cleaning is limited to publicly owned property or if private property is ever eligible.
Quintuple Funding Next Fiscal Year – The Administration indicates the use of ARPA for cleaning by
Advantage Services is expected to increase five-fold from $57,000 to $290,000 in FY23. The Council may
wish to ask why the increase is planned and what changes to the cleaning services could the public expect.
E-9: ARPA Westside Community Initiative (Perpetual Housing Fund) ($4 million from ARPA going
to a New Holding Account in the Grant Fund)
See Attachment 3 for the September 14 transmittal with the proposed framework.
The Administration is requesting $4 million from ARPA to seed a perpetual housing fund dedicated to the Westside
of the City defined as west of Interstate 15. The dedicated housing funds from the Inland Port Authority
Jurisdictional Boundary would provide an ongoing revenue stream. The RDA Board received an initial briefing on
this concept at the September 14 meeting. RDA staff are refining the draft policy and will return to the Board for a
follow up discussion in the coming months. The Council could wait to appropriate the $4 million or place it into a
holding account until the policy is adopted by the RDA Board. The draft program goals include:
- Develop land with a long-term approach to continuously serve a community-defined purpose (could use a
ground-lease approach)
- Create opportunities for revenue generation while balancing the implementation of public benefits (revenue
would be reinvested back into the fund)
- Assist the Westside in mitigating gentrification and displacement (the City’s ongoing study to mitigate
gentrification could inform the program policy)
- Give lower income households the opportunity to build wealth through ownership (similar to a community
land trust model aka a shared-equity model)
- Engage community members in development decisions
- Leverage resources for other neighborhood development purposes (such as subsidizing deeply affordable
housing, commercial space, public infrastructure and art)
- Collaborate with other partners to broaden the pool of funding and expertise
Page | 17
- Carry out efforts with a collective impact approach (including measurable results to report back to the RDA
Board and the public)
E-10: Nonprofit and Business Assistance Community Grants ($4 million from ARPA going to a New
Account in the Grant Fund)
The Administration is proposing $4 million for new one-time community grants split into two separate offerings:
$2 million for business assistance managed by the Economic Development Department (EDD) and $2 million for
nonprofit assistance managed by the Community and Neighborhoods (CAN) Department. The grants must be used
for eligible activities under the U.S. Treasury’s ARPA guidance and meet Federal reporting, compliance and
spending deadlines. Meeting these requirements could create a significant workload for the City’s Finance
Department and Attorney’s Office. For example, some potential categories are narrowly eligible only for evidence
based programs and practices which must have published research supporting interventions producing desired
outcomes. The Treasury is also expected to issue updated final guidance in the coming months.
An ad-hoc committee, or two (unclear at time of publishing this report), would be created to review applications,
question applicants, and have delegated final funding authority from the Council to make funding awards. The
committee(s) would include staff from the two departments managing the grants (EDD and CAN), Mayor’s Office,
Council Office, and a to be determined number of volunteers from several City boards and commissions.
The two departments report a request for proposals would be issued with a one-month window for applicants to
submit proposals. Then the committee(s) would score and rank applications over two weeks and make final
decisions. Funding would be distributed the following month.
Policy Questions:
Delegation of Authority for Deciding Funding Awards – The Council may wish to discuss whether to
delegate authority to the ad-hoc committee(s) or use another approach. For example, the Council could
elect to use the established process the City has for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), annual grants
like CDBG from the U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Department, and one-time CARES Act
relief grants. Under the existing process, the CDCIP Board reviews applications submitted during the open
and competitive process, asks questions of applicants at public meetings, then provides funding
recommendations to the Mayor who provides a second set of funding recommendations, next the Council
deliberates the proposed recommendations, holds a public hearing and makes final funding awards.
Equity Considerations – The Council may wish to discuss whether funding should have equity
considerations built-in to the framework. For example, during the pandemic Council Members discussed
the following categories in other grant programs: businesses in and nonprofits serving the Westside,
women-owned and/or minority-owned businesses, nonprofits serving low-income residents, programs
bridging the digital divide, food insecurity, increasing access to medical services and vaccines, etc.
Applicant Assistance – The Council may wish to ask the departments what community assistance resources
will be available for interested organizations to fill out applications? For example, where will in-person
computer labs be publicly accessible, in what languages will the applications and instructions be available,
who is the single-point of contact for each of the two grant programs, how will potential applicants learn
about the opportunity, etc.
Framework for the Grants – The Council may wish to ask the departments to return with proposed details
of a grants framework such as the CIP and CDBG processes. This could include information like
recommended grant program categories, funding minimums and/or maximums, required application
information, and public engagement steps.
Section F: Donations
(None)
Section G: Council Consent Agenda
Page | 18
G-1: Police Department Asset Forfeiture Grant ($1,500 – Miscellaneous Grants)
The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for and received a $1,500 grant award from the State of Utah,
Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), under the State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) program. The
SAFG program funds crime prevention and law enforcement activities within specific guidelines. CCJJ developed
the SAFG program as a means of evaluating and distributing state forfeiture funds.
The funds will be used for confidential informant funds to enhance investigations in narcotics-related cases. A
public hearing was held 9/7/21 for this grant application.
G-2: Utah Department of Health – Bureau of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Grant, FY22 Per
Capita Allocation ($10,250 – Miscellaneous Grants)
The Fire Department applied for and was awarded $10,250 of grant funding from the Utah Department of Health,
Bureau of Emergency Medical Services. This funding will be used towards the purchase of a 12-Lead Cardiac
Monitor and medical supplies relating to the provision of Emergency Medical Services as funding permits. A Public
Hearing was held on 2/16/21 for the grant applications on this award.
G-3: State of Utah, CCJJ (Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice), Jurisdictions with
Halfway Houses and Parole Violator Center Grant, Law Enforcement Services Account (LESA)
The Police Department has applied for and been awarded a $295,570 grant from the State of Utah, Commission on
Criminal and Juvenile Justice, in support of the Jurisdictions with Halfway Houses and Parole Violator Centers
grant. This grant provides funding for law enforcement agencies that provide services directly to areas with halfway
houses or parole violator centers, or both. The Police Department will use these funds for law enforcement overtime
related to reducing criminal activity including targeted enforcement operations, increased patrol response, and
responding to mental health calls for service. The Department will also utilize funds for case transcription services,
six overt camera units and maintenance/repairs/supplies for units in the Department's camera program. A public
hearing was held 9/7/21 for this grant application.
G-4: Utah State Office for Victims of Crime, 2021-23 VOCA Victims of Crime Act Grant ($364,162 –
Miscellaneous Grants)
The Police Department applied for and received a $364,162.48 grant from the State of Utah, Office for Victims of
Crime under the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) program, to be used for the continuation of the Victim Advocate
Program. These funds will be used to pay for salary and fringe for 4 existing full-time Victim Advocate positions and
all of the part-time Victim Advocate positions. This grant also covers the costs for Rita, the program's facility dog.
Additionally, there are supplies for the program, emergency funds for assisting victims, and training for Advocate
staff. No match is required by the funding agency.
VOCA funds cover local and national conferences and trainings needed to meet statutory training requirements for
the Victim Advocates. It also provides and emergency fund that can be used when no other victim funding options
are available - these funds can be used for food, clothing, shelter, transportation and 911 phones for victims of
violent crime. Additionally, it provides for supplies such as Victim Advocate brochures, Traumatic Death
Handbooks, cell phone costs, etc. A $109,938.89 match is required which will be satisfied by the salary and
benefits of City funded Victim Advocates and the Program Coordinator. In-kind matching funds are provided by
the student interns/volunteers that participate in the Victim Advocate Program. A Public Hearing was held 9/7/21
on this grant application.
G-5: Department of Workforce Services, Housing & Community Development Division, FY22
Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant Program ($370,735 – Miscellaneous Grants)
The Community and Neighborhoods Dept. applied for and received State Department of Workforce Services funding
of $370,735 to continue efforts to encourage businesses, residents, Homeless Resource Center (HRC) operators and
guests to participate in constructive community engagement opportunities and encourage service-based
interventions in order to successfully integrate the HRCs into the fabric of their host neighborhoods and ensure the
safety of those neighborhoods.
The SLC Mitigation team currently consists of a SLC Community Engagement Coordinator, VOA Business and
Community Liaison, and VOA Outreach Case Manager. This application requests to continue the current team and
expand the team to include an additional VOA Business and Community Liaison, additional VOA Outreach Case
Manager, and a VOA Outreach Peer Support Specialist, and three new positions as part of the City's existing
Page | 19
Downtown Ambassador program - tailored to the areas surrounding the HRCs (King, Miller, and Youth). A Public
Hearing was held on October 5, 2021.
G-6: Utah State Department of Public Safety – 2021 Emergency Management Performance Grant
(EMPG) ($42,500 – Miscellaneous Grants)
The Emergency Management Services Division received a $42,500 FY2021 EMPG grant from the State of Utah,
Department of Public Safety. This grant is awarded on an annual basis to jurisdictions to help offset costs of
planning and updating emergency preparedness plans, conduct emergency preparedness exercises and produce
materials and other media for public educational outreach and training pertaining to emergency preparedness.
SLC's population increases from 180,000 to an estimated 310,000 each workday. Should a disaster occur during the
workday, employees become a part of the SLC emergency response, but are not trained to assist themselves or
others. These funds will offset costs in providing National Incident Management System (NIMS) training to SLC
staff with emergency response responsibilities during a disaster or other significant event. The funds will be used to
fund community preparedness activities, purchase training materials, supplies and equipment including books,
brochures, handouts, etc. The grant requires a 50% match which will be satisfied with the Community Preparedness
Coordinator's time and budgeted for within Emergency Management’s general fund. A public hearing will be held
for this grant application.
G-7: Cities of Service, Johns Hopkins, Justice for the Jordan Grant – Love your Block – ($100,000 –
Miscellaneous Grants)
The office of the Mayor applied for and received $100,000 in grant funding for the Justice for the Jordan, Love your
Block grant. The grant provides:
1. $60,000 to hire a Love your Block Fellow for 2 years.
2. $40,000 to distribute to the community as mini grants
3. The City is also required to engage 2 AmeriCorps VISTA volunteers, one each year of the grant.
4. The City also receives technical assistance from Cities of Service
The Cities of Service Love Your Block program connects mayor’s offices with community residents to revitalize their
neighborhoods one block at a time. Typically, cities implementing Love Your Block invite community groups to
identify priority projects and award mini-grants to support volunteer-fueled solutions that the community can
implement. The City identifies a problem and then engages with volunteers within the neighborhoods of focus and
engages them early in the project design phase as well as implementation and evaluation. The City identified the
neighborhoods adjacent to the Jordan River in Glendale (census tract 1026, 1027.01, and 1028.01) as the target
area. A public hearing was held October 5, 2021.
G-8: Utah State Office for Victims of Crime, Violence Against Women Act, Domestic Violence Victim
Advocate
The City Prosecutors office applied for and received a $101,039 grant from the State of Utah, Office for Victims of
Crime under the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) program, to be used for the Violence Against Women’s Act to fund
Salt Lake City Prosecutor Domestic Violence Victim Advocate. The Prosecutor’s Office is requesting a Victim
Advocate to assist and support victims of domestic violence as their cases move to the prosecution and adjudication
phases. The services include information, education and advocacy through the case and prosecution, assistance
with victim impact statements, support and accompaniment to court and meetings with investigators and
prosecutors. The Victim Advocate assists in post release safety planning, preparation for court appearances, and jail
release agreements.
Until this year, Salt Lake County District Attorney Victim Services has provided this support for victims whose cases
are adjudicate in Salt Lake City Justice Court. Funding cutbacks required the county to reassign the advocates to
County prosecutions. Salt Lake City is applying for this new city position to fill the gap in services. The match is
$12,630 each fiscal year, for a total of $25,260 for the two-year performance period of the grant. The match is met
with cash available in the Office of the Attorney’s budget. A Public Hearing was held 6/15/21 on this grant
application.
Page | 20
Section I: Council Added Items
I-1: Council Office Reclassifications and Amending FY22 Appointed Pay Plan
The table below summarizes the reclassifications of six FTE appointed positions in the Council Office. Vacancy
savings will cover the cost difference for the current fiscal year.
Old Title / Grade New Title / Grade
Communications Director / 31x Public Engagement & Communications Specialist III / 31x
Public Engagement & Communications Specialist I / 26x Public Engagement & Communications Specialist II / 28x
Public Policy Analyst II / 31x Senior Public Policy Analyst / 33x
Public Policy Analyst II / 31x Senior Public Policy Analyst / 33x
Associate Deputy Director / 37x Deputy Director / 39x
Senior Public Policy Analyst / 33x Legislative & Policy Manager / 37x
ATTACHMENTS
1. Sales Tax Update and Chart
2. COVID-19 Local Assistance Matching Grant Program – New Water Reclamation Facility: Influent Pump Station
and Force Mains (Memo from Administration and Council staff report)
3. Westside Communities Initiative RDA Transmittal from September 14
ACRONYMS
ADA – Americans with Disabilities Act
AFSCME – American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
ARPA – American Rescue Plan Act
CAN – Community and Neighborhoods Department
CCAC – Citizens Compensation Advisory Committee
CCJJ – Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice
CCP – Community Commitment Program
CDBG – Community Development Block Grant
CHAT – Community Health Access Team
CIP – Capital Improvement Program
CIT – Crisis Intervention Team
EDLF – Economic Development Loan Fund
EMPG – Emergency Management Performance Grant
EMT – Emergency Medical Technician
FTE – Full Time Equivalent Position
FY – Fiscal Year
GARE – Government Alliance on Race and Equity
HRC – Homeless Resource Center
HUD – United States Housing and Urban Development Department
HVAC – Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
PPE – Personal Protective Equipment
RDA – Redevelopment Agency
REP – Racial Equity in Policing Commission
SAA – Special Assessment Area
TBD – To Be Determined
UDAQ – Utah Department of Air Quality
VISTA – Volunteers in Service to America
VOCA – Victims of Crime Act
1Subject:FW: Sales Tax Update Through FY 2021These are the Actuals of the 1% Sales Tax Through FY 2021. The last half of the year was big especially in the last quarter averaging 33.8% higher than the previous year. There are inflationary factors that play into this as well. The last 3 quarters have shown record highs, when you adjust the revenue by cpi the last month of June was the still the highest month on record. 1% sales tax revenue received, not adjusted for inflation Month of Sale 2019 2020 diff 20‐19 % Change 2021 diff 21‐20 %Change Note July 5,166,159 5,509,305 343,146 6.6% 5,506,282 (3,023) ‐0.1% August 5,494,943 5,453,557 (41,386) ‐0.8% 5,363,921 (89,636) ‐1.6% September 5,990,942 5,979,661 (11,281) ‐0.2% 6,506,479 526,818 8.8% October 4,966,702 5,463,847 497,146 10.0% 5,190,694 (273,154) ‐5.0% November 5,186,889 5,461,007 274,119 5.3% 5,880,648 419,640 7.7% December 6,321,763 6,883,312 561,549 8.9% 7,020,529 137,217 2.0% January 4,901,735 5,697,416 795,681 16.2% 5,255,105 (442,311) ‐7.8% February 4,925,841 4,468,260 (457,581) ‐9.3% 5,280,150 811,890 18.2% March 5,739,003 5,980,157 241,154 4.2% 7,133,537 1,153,380 19.3% April 4,743,045 4,607,410 (135,635) ‐2.9% 6,304,088 1,696,678 36.8% May 5,480,257 4,834,144 (646,112) ‐11.8% 6,319,024 1,484,880 30.7% June 5,980,148 5,986,060 5,912 0.1% 8,017,577 2,031,517 33.9% Total 64,897,427 66,324,138 1,426,711 73,778,034 7,453,896 Accommodation and Food Services is still slow because of the pandemic. 2020 to 2021 ‐ Sale Tax Actuals 2020 2021 Sector Name sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total Retail Trade 37,076,952 1,471,251 4% 41.4% 36,696,900 (380,052) ‐1% 42.4% Wholesale Trade 11,887,403 523,932 5% 13.3% 12,281,114 393,711 3% 14.2% Accommodation and Food Services 10,358,167 (2,386,736) ‐19% 11.6% 7,629,468 (2,728,698) ‐26% 8.8% Manufacturing 5,846,937 496,178 9% 6.5% 5,755,063 (91,874) ‐2% 6.7% Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 4,261,171 (610,243) ‐13% 4.8% 3,810,664 (450,508) ‐11% 4.4% Attachment 1 - Sales Tax Revenues Update through End of Fiscal Year 2021
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE: November 16, 2021
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSION
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: Nov. 16, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted seven grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them, the
grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under Public
Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
2. New Water Reclamation Facility: Influent Pump Station and Force Mains –
COVID-19 Local Assistance Matching Grant Program
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: If awarded, the grant monies will be used to help fund the
construction of the new Influent Pump Station Force Mains, (a sub-project of the Water
Reclamation Facility), and replace the existing pump station and force mains that are at the end
of their service life.
Grant Amount: $10 million dollars
Requested by: Department of Public Utilities
Funding Agency: Utah’s Governor’s Office for Policy and Budget in conjunction with
Utah Division of Water Quality
Match Requirement: $40 million dollars – Sources: The Department of Public Utilities
planned utility revenue bond issuances, and the secured loan through the Federal Water
Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act. The City committed a $40 million dollar
match for this project to increase the competitiveness of the application. Note: There is a
request in Budget Amendment #4 to set aside $2 million in miscellaneous grant funds
towards the $40 million required match.
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust-Jenson, Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson
CC: Sarah Behrens, Laura Briefer, Jaysen Oldroyd, Melyn Osmond, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Recorders
(All), Jordan Smith, Jesse Stewart, Lehua Weaver
FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg
DATE: September 17, 2021
SUBJECT: COVID-19 Local Assistance Matching Grant Program – New Water Reclamation Facility: Influent Pump
Station and Force Mains
FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Governor’s Office for Policy & Budget
GRANT PROGRAM: COVID-19 Local Assistance Matching Grant Program
REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $10,000,000
DEPARTMENT: Department of Public Utilities
COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Utah Division of Water Quality
DATE SUBMITTED: September 15, 2021
SPECIFICS:
□ Equipment/Supplies Only
□ Technical Assistance
□ Provides FTE
□ Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
□ Match Required □ In-Kind and □ Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities requested $10,000,000 for the New Water Reclamation Facility:
Influent Pump Station and Force Mains project.
The Influent Pump Station and Force Mains is a sub-project of the new Water Reclamation Facility and replaces
the existing pump station and force mains that are at the end of their service life.
Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities committed a $40 million match for the influent pump station and
force mains construction from its planned utility revenue bond issuances and from the secured loan through
federal Water Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act for the new Water Reclamation Facility to increase
the competitiveness of the application.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 118 WWW.SLC.GOV · WWW.SLCRDA.COM
P.O. BOX 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5518 TEL 801-535-7240 · FAX 801-535-7245
MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL
Executive Director
DANNY WALZ
Director
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY
STAFF MEMO
DATE: August 26, 2021
PREPARED BY: Tammy Hunsaker
RE: Westside Community Initiative – Initial Briefing
REQUESTED ACTION: Briefing on the framework for a new program intended to utilize Inland
Port Housing Funds to advance development activities on the City’s
Westside.
POLICY ITEM: Affordable housing; 9 Line and North Temple project area
development.
BUDGET IMPACTS: Inland Port Housing Funds.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Earlier this year, the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency
of Salt Lake City (“RDA”) directed staff to develop a proposed program for the utilization of funds
received by the RDA from the Inland Port Authority. These funds are received pursuant to Utah
Code Title 11-58 Utah Inland Port Authority Act, which provides that a portion of tax differential
generated within Inland Port Authority Jurisdictional Land shall be paid to the RDA to be utilized for
housing. As such, RDA staff is working to develop a new program, tentatively called the Westside
Community Initiative (“WCI”). While the proposed WCI is based on community land trust and
cooperative-style housing development, it is broader in nature to carry out other project types for a
collective impact.
As proposed, the WCI shall facilitate the implementation of transformative housing and mixed-use
projects with a focus on affordable homeownership as a way of building community cohesion and
personal wealth. The geographic scope of the initiative is proposed to be the City’s Westside defined
as west of I-15. The RDA’s 9 Line and North Temple project areas are included in this larger
geographic area. Affordable and mixed-income housing projects will be leveraged with additional
public benefits including neighborhood services, economic opportunity, and transit-oriented
development. By taking a long-term approach to development projects, the WCI will balance the
implementation of public benefits with the ability to generate revenue to be reinvested back into the
community.
Inland Port Housing Funds are required to be utilized for the purposes outlined in Utah 17C -
Community Reinvestment Agency Act, section 17-C-1-412 – Use of Housing Allocation, which
generally limits eligible activities to the development and preservation of housing targeted to
households at or below 80% of the area median income (“AMI”). Under the statute, funds can be
utilized to implement mixed-income projects, mixed-use projects, and related improvements. As
such, funds can be leveraged as part of housing projects for a broad array of other public benefits,
including infrastructure improvements, economic development, sustainable building practices, and
the redevelopment of undesirable land uses. While the primary source of revenue for the initiative is
anticipated to be Inland Port Housing Funds, the Board would be able to allocate other revenue
sources to the WCI. In addition, the RDA would actively work to acquire outside funding sources
and resources to collaborate on projects and activities. This could broaden the eligible uses of
funding dedicated to the WCI.
This memorandum includes initial information on the proposed framework for the WCI , including
the budget and policy structure, goals, and activities. RDA staff will incorporate the Board’s
feedback as specific details of the initiative are developed for the Board’s consideration at a future
date.
ANALYSIS & ISSUES: Additional details on the proposed framework of the WCI are as follows:
I. Budget & Policy Structure: To implement the WCI, the following efforts would need to be
carried out by the Board:
1. Update the RDA Housing Allocation Funds Policy, resolution R-4-2021, to earmark
the Inland Port Housing Funds for the WCI and to allow for allocations from other
revenue sources. This would be a minor change to the existing policy.
2. Create a new policy for the WCI that establishes the purpose, goals, activities,
metrics, and reporting requirements for the initiative. If the Board is supportive, this
policy would be based on the information contained herein.
While the WCI policy would identify the purposes, goals, and activities of the initiative,
projects would be administered pursuant to existing RDA programs and tools. Additionally, a
new policy would be developed for a Shared Equity Development program. Programs and
tools the WCI would be administered pursuant to are as follows:
• RDA Loan Program Policy: Resolution R-37-2016
• Tax Increment Reimbursement Program Policy: Resolution R-9-2017
• RDA Real Property Disposition Policy: Resolution R-6-2021
• Housing Development Loan Program: Resolution R-7-2021
• Shared Equity Housing Program: Resolution Forthcoming
Refer to Attachment A for a chart depicting the proposed structure of the WCI.
II. Goals: The goals for the WCI are proposed as follows:
• Develop Land with a Long-Term Approach to Continuously Serve a Community-
Defined Purpose
WCI will take a long-term approach to land development and community building so that the
RDA may retain the fee ownership to and a reversionary interest in the property. By ground
leasing to development partners, the RDA will provide an opportunity to receive revenue
generation to serve other public benefits.
• Create Opportunities for Revenue Generation while Balancing the Implementation of
Public Benefits
WCI will strive to balance the development of property with the incorporation of public
benefits. Benefits such as affordable housing and below-market commercial space which
generate limited or no cash flow would potentially be subsidized with land uses that generate
positive cash flow. Revenue generated by projects and received by the RDA will then be
reinvested back into the WCI with the goal of furthering shared prosperity.
• Assist the Westside in Mitigating Gentrification and Displacement
WCI will acquire land with the goal of holding it for the community in perpetuity, thereby
removing land from the speculative market so that it serves low and moderate -income
residents in perpetuity. Housing will remain affordable even as neighborhood change occurs
and gentrification pressures mount, which protects families from displacement.
• Give Lower Income Households the Opportunity to Build Wealth Through Ownership
WCI will create opportunities for families to buy homes at affordable prices by focusing on a
shared-equity model. A shared equity model offers an alternative form of ownership that
provides benefits traditional markets cannot, such as long-term housing affordability and the
ability for low and moderate-income families to build equity. When families decide to sell,
they will receive their portion of the appreciation but the RDA remains as the land owner and
is in the position to continue to sell the home at a below-market price, making it affordable to
another family of limited means. Keeping the home affordable, from family to family, will
benefit future generations by acting as a steppingstone for low-income families to go from
renting to building wealth.
• Engage Community Members in Development Decisions
The RDA will involve the community in the planning and goals regarding long term land use
and housing development. This can translate into residents actively involved in creating
positive change within their communities and projects that reflect the value of its residents.
The result will be projects that incorporate a shared mission and vision with the community.
• Leverage Resources for Other Neighborhood Development Purposes
Revenues acquired through ground leases or partnerships could contribute to other purposes,
including subsidizing deeply affordable housing, below-market commercial space,
infrastructure, public art, etc.
• Collaborate with Other Partners to Broaden the Pool of Funding and Expertise
The RDA would actively work to acquire outside funding sources and professional resources
by bringing together financial institutions, the private sector, nonprofits, public officials,
other government agencies, researchers, and practitioners to collaborate on community and
economic development activities.
• Carry Out Efforts with a “Collective Impact” Approach
The RDA will continuously evaluate how projects work together to address common goals
through a “collective impact” approach that produces measurable results. These measurable
results will be tracked and reported on to promote data-driven and outcome-based decisions.
III. Activities: The activities of the WCI are proposed as follows:
• Strategic Acquisitions
Strategic property acquisitions that may include distressed properties characterized by high
crime rates, properties that are located at target locations, and other opportunities that align
with the City’s objectives and meet predefined policy priorities. Properties will be
redeveloped as elevated real estate development projects that have profound impacts on
people, particularly low-income and vulnerable populations, in order to uplift others, create
economic opportunities, improve health outcomes, and influence the physical and
socioeconomic landscape of Salt Lake City.
• Shared Equity Models of Development
o Land Trust Development
The RDA will retain ownership of land and provide for the sale or rental of housing
to lower-income households. To make certain would-be homeowners and renters
benefit from the arrangement for years to come, the resale prices and rents of the
housing will be capped, maintaining affordability for the next family.
o Multifamily Cooperative Housing Development
The RDA will facilitate the development of cooperative housing projects to provide a
framework for homeownership by bringing people together to own the building in
which they live. A housing cooperative or "co-op" is a type of residential housing
option that is a corporation whereby the owners do not own their units outright.
Instead, each resident is a shareholder in the corporation based in part on the relative
size of the unit that they live in. The co-op housing model provides low-income
households with a way to accumulate personal wealth, through equity accumulation
and mortgage interest deductions.
• Residential and Mixed-Use Rental Housing Development
The RDA will facilitate the development of rental mixed-income and mixed-use projects that
are part of a larger coordinated effort to co-locate housing with the services and resources to
increase a person’s likelihood for upward mobility.
• Other Public Benefits
While it is anticipated that the WCI will focus on affordable housing due to certain funding
source restrictions, there is opportunity to leverage housing projects with broader public
benefits. Furthermore, there is opportunity to broaden the WCI’s funding sources, with both
internal and external sources, to expand the eligible activities funded through the WCI. Other
public benefits could include infrastructure improvements (both street and green
infrastructure), housing for a broad array of AMIs, job creation, small-business development,
street activation, publicly visible art, historic preservation, adaptive reuse, neighborhood
services, among others.
IV. Next Steps
RDA staff will incorporate the Board’s feedback on the information contained herein and
will return to the Board with the following:
1. Revisions to the RDA Housing Allocation Funds Policy, resolution R-4-2021, to
earmark Inland Port Funds for the WCI. The policy will also be revised to allow for
allocations of other sources of revenue to the initiative.
2. A new policy resolution for the WCI that establishes the purpose, goals, activities,
metrics, and reporting requirements for the initiative.
3. A new policy for a Shared Equity Housing Development program that provides for
homeownership by bringing people together to own the building in which they live
while the land is owned by the RDA, or another entity, to preserve affordability in
perpetuity.
PREVIOUS BOARD ACTION:
• May 2021 – The RDA Board directed RDA staff to develop a proposed program for a
community land trust type program for the City’s Westside that utilizes Inland Port funds.
ATTACHMENTS:
• A – Westside Community Initiative: Proposed Framework Chart
WESTSIDE COMMUNITY INITIATIVE (WCI)
PROPOSED FRAMEWORK
Note: The Initiative’s activities shall be administered pursuant to the following policies:
RDA Loan Program Policy: Resolution R-37-2016
Tax Increment Reimbursement Program Policy: Resolution R-9-2017
RDA Real Property Disposition Policy: Resolution R-6-2021
Housing Development Loan Program: Resolution R-7-2021
Shared Equity Housing Program: Resolution Forthcoming
• Develop Land with a Long-Term Approach to Continuously Serve a Community-Defined Purpose
• Create Opportunities for Revenue Generation while Balancing the Implementation of Public Benefits
• Assist the Westside in Mitigating Gentrification and Displacement
• Give Lower Income Households the Opportunity to Build Wealth Through Ownership
• Engage Community Members in Development Decisions
• Leverage Resources for Other Neighborhood Development Purposes
• Collaborate with Other Partners to Broaden the Pool of Funding and Expertise
• Carry Out Efforts with a “Collective Impact” Approach
GOALS
PURPOSE
The implementation of transformative housing and mixed-use projects with a focus
on homeownership and affordability as a way of building community cohesion and personal wealth.
Housing projects will be leveraged with additional public benets including
neighborhood services, economic opportunities, and transit-oriented development.
A Westside Community Initiative policy will be created that identies the purpose, goals, and activities of the initiative.
Projects will align with the intent of the WCI and will be administered through RDA programs and polices.
INLAND PORT
HOUSING
DIFFERENTIAL
OTHER
SOURCES
ALLOCATED BY
BOARD
WCI
REVENUE
WCI
HOUSING
FUND
FUNDING SOURCES
(revenues)
ACTIVITIES
(expenses)
STRATEGIC
ACQUISITION
SHARED
EQUITY
DEVELOPMENT
OTHER
PUBLIC
BENEFITS
RESIDENTIAL
&
MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT
Note: The RDA Housing Allocation Funds
policy, resolution R-4-2021, will be updated
to provide for the earmarking of Inland Port
Housing Funds, WCI revenue, and other funds
as determined by the BOD for the WCI. As the
Policy currently stands, there is a NWQ Housing
Fund that receives Inland Port Housing revenue.
This fund would be renamed to the WCI Housing
Fund.
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
MARY BETH THOMPSON
Chief Financial Officer
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
___________________________________ Date Received: ________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ___________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: October 25, 2021
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT: Budget Amendment #4 - Revised
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director (801) 535-6394 or
Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403
DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing,
the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2021-22 adopted budget.
BUDGET IMPACT:
REVENUE EXPENSE
GENERAL FUND $ 1,772,794.00 $ 4,657,529.00
WATER FUND 0.00 18,118.00
SEWER FUND 0.00 7,941.00
STORM WATER FUND 0.00 2,278.00
AIRPORT FUND 0.00 39,790.00
REFUSE FUND 24,907.00 4,109.00
GOLF FUND 14,310.00 1,802,257.00
FLEET FUND 438,905.00 423,258.00
IMS FUND 161,380.00 135,492.00
MISCELLANEOUS GRANT FUND 17,497,861.48 15,751,215.48
DEBT SERVICE FUND 26,165,000.00 26,165,000.00
CIP FUND 23,400,000.00 23,400,000.00
RISK FUND 212,897.00 212,897.00
TOTAL $ 69,688,054.48 $ 72,619,884.48
Lisa Shaffer (Oct 25, 2021 17:23 MDT)
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Revenue for FY 2021-22 Budget Adjustments
Because the fiscal year just started the Fiscal Year 2022 projections are at budget. The following
chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2022.
Projections for fiscal year 2021 are coming in better than expected, more detail will be shared as
the audit progresses.
Given the available information fund balance would be projected as follows:
With the current use of fund balance from this budget amendment fund balance drops to 12.86%.
FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL
Beginning Fund Balance 6,625,050 82,617,126 89,242,176 7,018,483 50,124,619 57,143,102
Budgeted Change in Fund Balance 2,924,682 (7,810,302) (4,885,620) (4,759,137) (19,471,917) (24,231,054)
Prior Year Encumbrances (3,733,743) (6,165,453) (9,899,196) - - -
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 5,815,989 68,641,371 74,457,360 2,259,346 30,652,702 32,912,048
Beginning Fund Balance Percent 16.62%23.32%22.61%5.60%9.64%9.18%
Year End CAFR Adjustments
Revenue Changes - - - - - -
Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) - (5,676,583) (5,676,583) 5,759,137 7,652,037 13,411,174
Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 5,815,989 62,964,788 68,780,777 8,018,483 38,304,739 46,323,222
Final Fund Balance Percent 16.62%21.39%20.88%19.87%12.05%12.93%
Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance
BA#1 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - -
BA#1 Expense Adjustment - - - - 5,138,235 5,138,235
BA#2 Revenue Adjustment - - - - 490,847 490,847
BA#2 Expense Adjustment - (288,488) (288,488) - (986,298) (986,298)
BA#3 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - -
BA#3 Expense Adjustment - (6,239,940) (6,239,940) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (2,000,000)
BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - - - 1,772,794 1,772,794
BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - - - (4,657,529) (4,657,529)
BA#5 Revenue Adjustment - (242,788) (242,788) - - -
BA#5 Expense Adjustment - (2,783,685) (2,783,685) - - -
BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - -
BA#6 Expense Adjustment - (63,673) (63,673) - - -
BA#7 Revenue Adjustment - 540,744 540,744 - - -
BA#7 Expense Adjustment - (6,582,824) (6,582,824) - - -
BA#8 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - -
BA#8 Expense Adjustment (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (2,000,000) - - -
BA#9 Revenue Adjustment - 439,809 439,809 - - -
BA#9 Expense Adjustment - 362,532 1,555,532 - - -
Change in Revenue 2,202,494 3,018,144 5,220,638 - - -
Fund Balance Budgeted Increase - - - - - -
- - Adjusted Fund Balance 7,018,483 50,124,619 58,336,102 7,018,483 39,062,788 46,081,271
Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 20.05%17.03%17.71%17.39%12.28%12.86%
Projected Revenue 35,000,000 294,345,168 329,345,168 40,359,137 317,980,599 358,339,736
2021 Projection 2022 Projection
The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $69,688,054.48 of revenue and
expense of $72,619,884.48. The amendment proposes changes in thirteen funds, with
$2,884,735.00 from the General Fund fund balance. The proposal includes forty-one initiatives
for Council review. Including the addition of 22 FTEs in the General Fund supported by grant
funding.
A summary spreadsheet document, outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The
Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council.
The revision corrects numbering issues in section E of the Detail Document.
The budget opening is separated in eight different categories:
A. New Budget Items
B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources
C. Grants for New Staff Resources
D. Housekeeping Items
E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
F. Donations
G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards
I. Council Added Items
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2021
Fourth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including
the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2021-2022
In June of 2021, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City,
Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
2021 and ending June 30, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the
Utah Code.
The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with
the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments
to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically
stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and
inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document as provided above, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of
Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized
by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2021.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes
specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the
same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the
amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning
2
July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128
of the Utah Code.
SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is
authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in
the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2021.
________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________
Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed
_________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _________ of 2021.
Published: ___________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
Senior City Attorney
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance
Costs
Risk 212,897.00 212,897.00 - - One-time -
1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance
Costs
GF 128,888.00 - - One-time -
1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance
Costs
Water 18,118.00 - - One-time -
1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance
Costs
Sewer 7,941.00 - - One-time -
1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance
Costs
Storm Water 2,278.00 - - One-time -
1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance
Costs
Airport 39,790.00 - - One-time -
1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance
Costs
Refuse 4,109.00 - - One-time -
1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance
Costs
Golf 2,257.00 - - One-time -
1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance
Costs
Fleet 2,938.00 - - One-time -
1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance
Costs
IMS 4,492.00 - - One-time -
2 Department of Air Quality Lawnmower
Exchange
GF - 250,000.00 - - One-time -
3 COVID Safe Building Improvements GF - 844,000.00 - - One-time -
3 COVID Safe Building Improvements IMS 131,000.00 131,000.00 - - One-time -
4 Pulled Prior to Submission - - - -
5 Community Health Access Team Vehicles GF - 150,000.00 - - One-time -
5 Community Health Access Team Vehicles Fleet 150,000.00 150,000.00 - - One-time -
6 Non Represented Employee Job Salary
Survey
GF - 75,000.00 - - One-time -
7 Sugar House SAA GF - 60,000.00 - - One-time -
8 Sorenson Impact Center Social Investment GF - 150,000.00 - - One-time -
9 Pulled Prior to Submission - - - - -
10 Community Health Access Team (CHAT)
FTE Transfer
GF - - - - Ongoing -
11 Rose Park Golf Course Water & Energy
Efficiency Grant (Matching Funds)
Golf - 1,800,000.00 - - One-time -
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed
Section A: New Items
1
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
(Continued)
12 ARPA Funding -Housing & Homelessness -
Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park
Ranger program (see Item C-1 & E-3 & E-4)
GF 1,064,368.00 1,064,368.00 - - Ongoing 19.00
12 ARPA Funding -Housing & Homelessness -
Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park
Ranger program (see Item C-1 & E-3 & E-4)
GF 443,676.00 443,676.00 - - One-time -
12 ARPA Funding -Housing & Homelessness -
Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park
Ranger program (see Item C-1 & E-3 & E-4)
Fleet 195,720.00 195,720.00 - - One-time -
13 ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness -
CCP Rapid Intervention Teams (See Item C-
2 & E-5)
GF 164,750.00 164,750.00 - - Ongoing 3.00
1 ARPA Funding -Housing & Homelessness -
Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park
Ranger program (See Item A-12 & E-3 &
E4)
Misc Grants 1,064,368.00 1,064,368.00 - - Ongoing -
2 ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness -
CCP Rapid Intervention Team (See Item A-
13 & E-5)
Misc Grants 164,750.00 164,750.00 - - Ongoing -
Council Approved
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Administration Proposed
Section A: New Items
2
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 Economic Development Loan Fund Move Housing - (100,000.00) - - One-time -
1 Economic Development Loan Fund Move Housing 100,000.00 - - One-time -
1 Economic Development Loan Fund Move GF 100,000.00 100,000.00 - - One-time -
2 Increase Grant Fund Misc Grants 1,746,646.00 - - - Ongoing -
3 Premium Holiday - Other Funds Refuse 24,907.00 - - - One-time
3 Premium Holiday - Other Funds Golf 14,310.00 - - - One-time
3 Premium Holiday - Other Funds Fleet 18,585.00 - - - One-time
3 Premium Holiday - Other Funds IMS 30,380.00 - - - One-time
4 GPS Housekeeping GF - (74,600.00) - - One-time -
4 GPS Housekeeping GF - 74,600.00 - - One-time -
4 GPS Housekeeping Fleet 74,600.00 74,600.00 - - One-time -
5 Signage FTE Correction GF - 51,847.00 - - Ongoing -
6 General Obligation Series 2021A Bonds CIP 23,400,000.00 23,400,000.00 - - One-time -
6 General Obligation Series 2021A Bonds Debt Service 200,000.00 200,000.00 - - One-time -
7 Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series
2021A
Debt Service 10,665,000.00 10,665,000.00 - - One-time -
7 Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series
2021A
Debt Service 10,400,000.00 10,400,000.00 - - One-time -
7 Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series
2021A
Debt Service 4,900,000.00 4,900,000.00 - - One-time -
8 Budget Carry Forward GF - 1,175,000.00 One-time -
Council Approved
Section D: Housekeeping
Administration Proposed
3
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 ARPA Funding - Water and Sewer
Infrastructure Projects
Misc Grants 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 - - One-time -
2 ARPA Funding - Housing & Homelessness -
Winter Shelter Support
Misc Grants 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 - - One-time -
3 ARPA Funding - Housing & Homelessness -
Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park
Ranger program (See Item A-12, C-1 & E4)
Misc Grants 443,676.00 443,676.00 - - Ongoing -
4 ARPA Funding - Housing & Homelessness -
Public Lands Park Ranger program (See
Item A-12, C-1 & E-3)
Misc Grants 69,244.00 69,244.00 - - Ongoing -
5 ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness
– CCP Rapid Intervention Team (See Item
A-13 & C-2)
Misc Grants 160,500.00 160,500.00 - - One-time -
6 ARPA Funding - Housing & Homelessness -
CCP Rapid Intervention Team (Police
Support)
Misc Grants 1,505,920.00 1,505,920.00 - - One-time -
7 Pulled Prior to Submission to allow for the
completion of phase 2 of the Social Impact
Investment
Misc Grants - - - - -
8 ARPA Funding - Housing and
Homelessness - HEART Rapid Intervention
Team (Advantage Services)
Misc Grants 57,000.00 57,000.00 - - One-time -
9 ARPA Funding – Building the lifeboat with
Urban Land Fund
Misc Grants 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 - - One-time -
10 ARPA Funding – Community Grants Misc Grants 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 - - One-time -
-
Section F: Donations
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Administration Proposed Council Approved
4
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
Consent Agenda #2
1 Police Department State Asset Forfeiture
Grant
Misc Grants 1,500.00 1,500.00 - - One-time -
2 Utah Department of Health - Bureau of
Emergency Medical Services (EMS)grant,
FY22 Per Capita Allocation
Misc Grants 10,250.00 10,250.00 - - One-time -
3 State of Utah, CCJJ (Commission on
Criminal and Juvenile Justice),
Jurisdictions with Halfway Houses and
Parole Violator Centers Grant, Law
Enforcement Services Account (LESA)
Misc Grants 295,571.00 295,571.00 - - One-time -
4 Utah State Office for Victims of Crime, 2021-
2023 VOCA Victims of Crime Act Grant
Misc Grants 364,162.48 364,162.48 - - One-time -
5 Department of Workforce Services,
Housing & Community Development
Division, FY22 Homeless Shelter Cities
Mitigation Grant Program
Misc Grants 370,735.00 370,735.00 - - One-time -
6 Utah State Department of Public Safety -
2021 Emergency Management Performance
Grant (EMPG)
Misc Grants 42,500.00 42,500.00 - - One-time -
7 Cities of Service, Johns Hopkins, Justice for
the Jordan Grant, Love Your Block
Misc Grants 100,000.00 100,000.00 - - One-time -
8 Utah State Office for Victims of Crime,
Violence Against Women Act, Domestic
Violence Victim Advocate
Misc Grants 101,039.00 101,039.00 - - One-time -
Total of Budget Amendment Items 69,688,054.48 72,619,884.48 - - 22.00
Administration Proposed Council Approved
Section I: Council Added Items
Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards
5
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
Total by Fund Class, Budget Amendment #4:
General Fund GF 1,772,794.00 4,657,529.00 - - 22.00
Water Fund Water - 18,118.00 - - -
Sewer Fund Sewer - 7,941.00 - - -
Storm Water Fund Storm Water - 2,278.00 - - -
Airport Fund Airport - 39,790.00 - - -
Refuse Fund Refuse 24,907.00 4,109.00 - - -
Golf Fund Golf 14,310.00 1,802,257.00 - - -
Fleet Fund Fleet 438,905.00 423,258.00 - - -
IMS Fund IMS 161,380.00 135,492.00 - - -
Miscellaneous Grants Fund Misc Grants 17,497,861.48 15,751,215.48 - - -
Housing Fund Housing - - - - -
Debt Service Fund Debt Service 26,165,000.00 26,165,000.00 - - -
CIP Fund CIP 23,400,000.00 23,400,000.00
Risk Fund Risk 212,897.00 212,897.00 - - -
- - -
Total of Budget Amendment Items 69,688,054.48 72,619,884.48 - - 22.00
Administration Proposed Council Approved
6
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only
FY 2021-22 Budget, Including Budget Amendments
FY 2021-22
Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total
^^ Total Through
BA#5 ^^
General Fund (FC 10)367,582,070 (5,138,235.00) 986,298.00 2,000,000.00 4,657,529.00 370,087,662.00
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00
DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)2,033,573 2,033,573.00
Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,550,000 1,550,000.00
Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,699,663 7,098.00 5,706,761.00
Water Fund (FC 51)127,365,555 460,716.00 18,118.00 127,844,389.00
Sewer Fund (FC 52)268,213,796 221,826.00 7,941.00 268,443,563.00
Storm Water Fund (FC 53)19,201,013 19,705.00 2,278.00 19,222,996.00
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)706,792,500 1,350,949.00 39,790.00 708,183,239.00
Refuse Fund (FC 57)24,713,505 36,538.00 4,109.00 24,754,152.00
Golf Fund (FC 59)9,697,417 19,649.00 88,749.00 1,802,257.00 11,608,072.00
E-911 Fund (FC 60)4,056,856 4,056,856.00
Fleet Fund (FC 61)28,090,576 18,999.00 112,646.00 423,258.00 28,645,479.00
IMS Fund (FC 65)24,302,487 219,193.00 135,492.00 24,657,172.00
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for
Transportation (FC 69)
5,307,142 5,307,142.00
CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,341,332 5,341,332.00
Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)18,684,617 10,427,551.76 1,522,743.00 15,751,215.48 46,386,127.24
Other Special Revenue (FC 73)273,797 273,797.00
Donation Fund (FC 77)2,752,565 2,752,565.00
Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)16,121,000 - 16,121,000.00
Debt Service Fund (FC 81)31,850,423 26,165,000.00 58,015,423.00
CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)29,503,216 (150,753.00) 23,400,000.00 52,752,463.00
Governmental Immunity (FC 85)2,933,913 24,843.00 2,958,756.00
Risk Fund (FC 87)52,939,489 19,705.00 212,897.00 53,172,091.00
Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,755,009,505 7,688,537.76 2,559,683.00 2,000,000.00 72,619,884.48 - 1,839,877,610.24
Budget Manager
Analyst, City Council
Contingent Appropriation
7
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
1
Section A: New Items
A-1: Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs Risk $212,897.00
GF $128,888.00
Water $18,118.00
Sewer $7,941.00
Storm Water $2,278.00
Airport $39,790.00
Refuse $4,109.00
Golf $2,257.00
Fleet $2,938.00
IMS $4,492.00
Department: Attorney - Risk Prepared By: Tamra Turpin
For Questions Please Include: Tamra Turpin, Sandee Moore, Katherine Lewis, Aaron Bentley
(1) The cost of excess liability insurance increased significantly for FY22 – more than a 65% increase in premium cost over
the previous policy period. The bulk of this is driven by recent claim development.
Last year’s premium was $267,278. The renewal premium cost is $443,112.54. We had projected a 15% increase and the
actual cost is more than we could cover with our allocated budget.
The City’s insurance brokers were able to arrange for us to pay the premium in two installments with the second half
($221,556.27) being due by 1/1/2022 to give us time to request a budget amendment.
(2) The cost of cyber liability insurance also increased significantly for FY22 -- 320%. Last year’s premium was $45,490.
The renewal premium cost is $190,887.60. Although we had projected an increase, the actual cost is far more than we could
have anticipated. There are a number of reasons for this; particularly the fact that public agencies are becoming frequent
targets, and the number and cost of claim payouts have increased exponentially. After conferring with the City's Chief
Information Officer and City Attorney, it was agreed that allowing the City's cyber coverage to lapse would be too risky.
The City’s insurance brokers were able to arrange a 45-day extension and then a 90-day premium payment deferral in
order to get a budget amendment in place. The cost will be allocated to all funds as shown in the amendment.
A-2: Department of Air Quality Lawnmower Exchange GF $250,000.00
Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Gregg Evans
For Questions Please Include: Debbie Lyons, Sophia Nicholas, Gregg Evans
The Utah Department of Air Quality (UDAQ) administers an annual gas-powered lawnmower and yard equipment
exchange in order to reduce criteria pollutants in the areas of the Wasatch Front that are in non-attainment with the Clean
Air Act air quality standards. Because the Wasatch Front is on track for attainment of wintertime PM2.5, UDAQ is not
running a snowblower exchange this year. Instead, they are focusing on programs to reduce summertime ozone pollution,
for which the Wasatch Front is out of attainment .
UDAQ has $900,000 set aside to continue the exchanges for the foreseeable future. The size of the lawnmower exchange
varies each year depending on the size of financial contributions from partners. Typically, UDAQ contributes between
$300,000 and $400,000 per exchange.
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
2
The Sustainability Department is proposing a budget amendment of $250,000 General Funds to partner with UDAQ in
FY22 on a gas-powered lawnmower exchange. This would facilitate exchanges for approximately 1,000 Salt Lake City
residents
Salt Lake City participated in 2021, spending nearly $161,000 which helped 582 residents participate. In total, 509 gas -
powered mowers were exchanged (the remaining participants bought new mowers without exchanging an old one). This is
the equivalent of removing 4.02 tons of pollution from the airshed each year. A majority of residents also opted to
participate in our Call 2 Haul program to have their gas mower picked up curbside and recycled by Salt Lake City Waste
and Recycling.
The Administration proposes continuing this program in FY 22 (spring 2022). The goal will be to increase participation
from 582 to 1,000 with a continued focus on our Westside neighborhoods. The Administration anticipates greater
awareness and uptake of the program in the comin g year due to increased familiarity with the program, and plans to work
with UDAQ on earlier, targeted outreach given the lessons learned from spring 2021. UDAQ anticipates the program
logistics will change in FY 22 to facilitate easier participation and lower administrative burden. In particular, they are
hoping to develop a phone app that participants will use to sign up and upload any required receipts.
UDAQ is also envisioning the next program will offer a promotional discount code to be used towar d the purchase of
electric lawn equipment and an app would also help separate Salt Lake City residents from other participating Wasatch
Front residents. This will reduce confusion as to who is eligible for curbside pickup of their old mowers. We also hope the
app will help us keep the exchange open for longer for Salt Lake City residents instead of opening, closing it, and opening i t
again while UDAQ verifies addresses.
While the exact amount of the discounts have yet to be determined, the Sustainability D epartment proposes using
$250,000 in City General Funds to facilitate approximately 1,000 gas-powered mower exchanges. This budget amendment
would also fund temporary staffing expenses to assist with running curbside collection of old mowers through Call 2 Haul.
This benefit was very popular last year and helped make this program more equitable to those who might not have the
ability to haul their own mower to a metal recycler.
A-3: COVID Safe Building Improvements GF $844,000.00
IMS $131,000.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dawn Valente
For Questions Please Include: Lorna Vogt, Dawn Valente
At the beginning of the year, and in anticipation of the reopening of the City and County Building, the Public Services
Department identified a series of critical improvements to minimize the spread of diseases such as COVID -19. Following
recommendations from hired consultants (see attached COVID annex) as well as health officials, changes include a multi -
level approach to keeping building occupants safe, from controlled access through a check-in desk and appointment
management software, to improved indoor air quality. The Department has been informed previously that the following list
of items are likely eligible to be covered under ARPA:
* Needlepoint Devices. When installed in the air handling system of a building, indoor air quality improves reducing
airborne contaminants $250,000 (CCB)
* Open and Public Meeting Rooms: Redesign public meeting rooms for spacing and cleaning considerations. This i ncludes
replacing chairs for disinfecting purposes. $60,000
* Lobby Appointment management software to be installed at the entrance to the building, allowing for IDing and
occupancy control. $5,000
* Entrance furniture. Desk and chairs to be installed at the entrance to the building, creating a check-in area $6,000
* Noticing Board outside of the City & County and Plaza 349 Buildings: Due to State noticing adjustments and the building
access being limited, public notices are not addressing the community in the various accessible options (walking public,
visitors to the building, etc.). Hybrid meetings and other noticing requirements are required to be completed and are
currently being posted on the doors that are frequently accessed. $10,000
* Staffing Entrance. Customer service-oriented staff, under seasonal status, to welcome and direct visitors to the building.
$17,000
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
3
* Enhanced Janitorial. Adjusting the cleaning schedule of all areas of the building from 3 to 5 days a week. (9 months)
$165,000
* Cubicle Pieces. To accommodate office reconfigurations. $100,000
* COVID Supplies/PPE. These supplies are being made available throughout buildings, including facemasks, hand sanitizer
and disposable gloves. $100,000
* Teleconference and Recording Meeting Equipment. Required to accommodate virtual and hybrid public meetings, and
training/orientation including those for Mayor's Board & Commissions, and City Council. $131,000
$844,000 TOTAL
A-4: Pulled Prior to Submission
A-5: Community Health Access Team Vehicles GF $150,000.00
Fleet $150,000.00
Department: Fire/Public Services Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Karl Lieb, Chris Milne, Clint Rasmussen, Lorna Vogt, Nancy Bean, Dawn
Valente
Community Health Access Team, CHAT (formerly known as the Community Healthcare Paramedic Team) was initially
established in 2013, comprised of one SLCFD paramedic. It quickly grew to include a SLCFD Captain and then another
paramedic. The two Paramedics responded as a team to patients that were identified by fire EMS crews as: (1) not meeting
the criteria for emergency service, or (2) not benefitting from the scope of training provided to fire department Paramedics
and EMTs. The CHAT initiative proposes adding two (2) social workers to increase the team’s scope and the ability of the
team to address the overall needs of their patients particularly pertaining to the challenges of mental health and
homelessness.
Currently, the Community Heath team operates with one vehicle. The addition of two social workers will create the need
for two vehicles as two teams will be operating simultaneously. This budget amendment will allow the fire department to
replace the current vehicle, a larger inefficient Chevy Tahoe with a fuel-efficient hybrid Ford Explorer. Additionally, a
second vehicle of the same kind will be purchased for the additional team. The third purchased fuel -efficient hybrid Ford
Explorer will replace an additional Chevy Tahoe in the Medical Division which will be used to support the CHAT initiative
immediately and provide for the anticipated rapid expansion of the CHAT program.
The three hybrid Ford Explorers will need to be outfitted with graphics, radios, tablets, etc. The $50,000 cost pe r vehicle is
the fully loaded cost.
Cost of Vehicle 42,500 127,500
Make ready 2,500 7,500
GPS 316 948
Fuel 2,950 8,850
Maintenance 1,734 5,202
TOTAL 50,000 150,000
A-6: Non-Represented Employees' Job Salary Survey GF $75,000.00
Department: Human Resources Prepared By: David Salazar
For Questions Please Include: Debra Alexander, David Salazar, John Vuyk
This request is intended for consultative services to be provided by a qualified third -party consultant or firm to conduct a
compensation survey to assess, evaluate and compare the overall pay structure, including actual base pay and other job
elements, of SLC’s non-represented employees to other public and private sector entities with whom the city competes for
talent. The recommended survey project includes data collection, analysis, and the development and presentation of a
report with recommendations for the City’s Department of Human Resources, Citizens Compensation Advisory Committee
(CCAC), and elected officials to consider. The survey will be conducted with a primary focus on cash compensation and rely
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
4
on the same caliber and methodology as surveys previously completed for the City's public safety and AFSCME-covered
employee groups (as completed by Mercer in early 2019 and 2020, respectively).
A-7: Sugar House SAA GF $60,000.00
Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Ben Kolendar
For Questions Please Include: Ben Kolendar
The City received a request from the Sugar House Community Council regarding the creation of an economic promotion
special assessment area (SAA) for the Sugar House for roughly west/east boundaries of 700 East to 1300 East and
north/south of Hollywood Avenue (possibly extending north on 1100 East to Ramona Avenue to include supporters in that
area) to I-80. The Department of Economic Development would run the Initial phases of the assessment and present
considerations to Council prior to formal action.
The funding request will provide consulting services for shape files, tax revenue estimates. The funding will also provide
bond counsel for the language in the draft notice of Intent to designate.
A-8: Sorenson Impact Center Social Investment GF $150,000.00
Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Ben Kolendar
For Questions Please Include: Ben Kolendar
The Administration would like to request $150,000 for the completion of Phase II of the Sorenson Social Impact
investment project.
A-9: Pulled Prior to Submission
A-10: Community Health Access Team (CHAT)
Personnel Transfer
GF $0.00
Department: Fire Development Prepared By: Clint Rasmussen
For Questions Please Include: Karl Lieb, Clint Rasmussen
CHAT (formerly known as the Community Healthcare Paramedic Team) was initially established in 2013, comprised of one
SLCFD paramedic. It quickly grew to include a SLCFD Captain and then another paramedic. The two Paramedics
responded as a team to patients that were identified by fire EMS crews as: (1) not meeting the criteria for emergency
service, or (2) not benefitting from the scope of training provided to fire department Paramedics and EMTs. The CHAT
initiative proposes transferring two (2) social workers and one (1) case manager (LCSW) from the Police Department to
increase the team’s scope and the ability of the team to address the overall needs of their patients particularly pertaining to
the challenges of mental health and homelessness.
This amendment would transfer three (3) PCNs from the Police Department to the Fire Department and adjust the staffing
document. The funding for these positions remains in Non-Departmental.
A-11: Rose Park Golf Course Water & Energy Efficiency
Grant (Matching Funds)
Golf $1,800,000.00
Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Bryce Lindeman
Dawn Valente
For Questions Please Include: Kristen Riker, Bryce Lindeman, Dawn Valente, Laura Briefer
The Administration is recommending recognizing $1.8 million in Golf revenue as matching funds for a potential grant. The
grant funds and cash match will be used for the installation of water conservation landscape irrigation measures for the
Rose Park Golf Course. The existing simple grid irrigation system will be replaced with a head-to-head system with high
efficiency nozzles that enable watering to match turf type. Turf removal will reduce square footage of high -water fairway
grass types and increase square footage of out of bounds rough areas re -seeded with low water grass types.
The project is a shared priority for the City's Department of Public Utilities and Department of Public Lands. Department
of Public Utilities is the project lead for the grant application. Any additional match committed at the time of application
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
5
that is over and above $1.8 million requested in this budget amendment will be in the form of the cash value of the
dedication of effort by existing full-time position(s) in the Department of Public Utilities and/or Department of Public
Lands to the project.
A-12: ARPA Funding -Public Safety and Homelessness
Outreach - Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park
Ranger program (see Item C-1, E-3 & E-4)
GF $1,064,368.00
GF $443,676.00
Fleet $195,720.00
Department: Mayor’s Office & Public Lands Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, Kristen Riker, John
Vuyk
Over the past few years, Public Lands has experienced a dramatic increase of individuals experiencing homelessness using
the parks for overnight camping. This vulnerable population also attracts an increase in people who prey upon them and
impact other park users with drug use, drug sales, and other crime. Public Lands employees have found themselves in the
middle of this extremely complex community crisis, without training or resources to work in this new environment. Public
Lands relies on the SLCPD to enforce camping and anti-loitering ordinances, to assist in clearing areas so staff can
complete their duties, and to respond to calls for public safety in parks. However, SLCPD has city-wide responsibilities and
is not always available for non-urgent park safety needs.
SLC Public Lands is proposing a Park Ranger program to maximize public safety, protect park resources, and to provide
services and information to park visitors. Park rangers may serve as law enforcement officers, environmental experts,
interpreter of cultural and historical points of interest or a combination of the three. This proposal is intended to meet the
following program success indicators:
Making people feel welcome and safe in our parks
Deterring inappropriate activity
Gaining voluntary compliance of park codes and rules
Reducing the number of annual vandalism incidents
Reducing annual costs to repair/replace damaged landscape & infrastructure
The Mayor is proposing to allocate $5.1 million toward a Public Lands Park Ranger program. Funding for the program will
be partially supported through the use of eligible salary restoration dollars. The program will help ensure park safety,
including homeless outreach in the parks.
The Program will include the addition of nineteen employees in the Public Lands Department. The positions are two Park
Ranger Sergeants, sixteen Park Ranger Officers and one support person. The projected annual cost for personnel including
uniforms, training and operational costs is $2,350,983. The amendment proposes to add these positions on January 1 at a
cost of $1,175,491 for the current fiscal year.
The proposed funding will also support one-time costs to implement the program of $401,800, including the purchase of
three trucks and two light response vehicles. Funding for personnel and ongoing costs will be transferred to the General
Fund while funding for the vehicles will be transferred to Fleet.
This funding will be established through a capture of funding for salary restoration from the current fiscal year.
A-13: ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness - Salary
Restoration – CCP Rapid Intervention Team – (See Item
C-2 & E-5)
GF $164,750.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson and John Vuyk
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
6
In September 2020, Mayor Mendenhall launched the Community Commitment Program through the Homeless
Engagement and Response Team. The CCP prioritizes outreach to indi viduals experiencing homelessness while also
emphasizing the need to keep public spaces safe, clean, and accessible to all. The first phase of the CCP was a 12 -week
enhanced neighborhood cleaning program based on neighborhood hot spots reported in CitySour ced via the SLC Mobile
app. The second phase, which has transitioned into an ongoing partnership with Salt Lake County and over a dozen service
providers, focused on intensive encampment outreach of varying lengths of time depending on the size and other
characteristics of camps. After approximately 9 months of this second phase, the City and our partners have been in a
maintenance stage, during which the City has fewer large encampments but is still attempting to handle the nearly 6,000
CitySourced reports over this past year. This figure is triple the number of complaints reported in the app in years past.
To more effectively and rapidly address these complaints from residents and businesses, the Mayor is proposing the
creation of a Rapid Intervention Team coordinated through HEART. The HEART coordinator (via a position that was
funded by the Council in the FY23 budget) will ensure that complaints are responded to with the appropriate level of
outreach through the SLCPD’s CCC or VOA, SLCPD officers to standby if necessary, as well as a City cleaning team working
with Advantage Services. By having a dedicated team to respond, Public Services and Waste & Recycling employees will not
be pulled away from their regular duties, as they are currently when the Cou nty Health Department requires camp
abatement support. The Public Services and Waste and Recycling employees will also be available to respond to illegal
dumping complaints throughout the City.
The program will add three FTE’s for the Rapid Intervention Team. These employees will be covered in part the first year.
This funding will be established through a capture of funding for salary restoration from the current fiscal year.
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
C-1: ARPA Funding – Public Safety and Homeless
Outreach – Public Lands Park Ranger program (See Item
A-12, E-3 & E-4)
Misc Grants $1,064,368.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
Over the past few years, Public Lands has experienced a dramatic increase of individuals experiencing homelessness using
the parks for overnight camping. This vulnerable population also attracts an increas e in people who prey upon them and
impact other park users with drug use, drug sales, and other crime. Public Lands employees have found themselves in the
middle of this extremely complex community crisis, without training or resources to work in this new environment. Public
Lands relies on the SLCPD to enforce camping and anti-loitering ordinances, to assist in clearing areas so staff can
complete their duties, and to respond to calls for public safety in parks. However, SLCPD has city -wide responsibilities
and is not always available for non-urgent park safety needs.
SLC Public Lands is proposing a Park Ranger program to maximize public safety, protect park resources, and to provide
services and information to park visitors. Park rangers may serve as law enforcement officers, environmental experts,
interpreter of cultural and historical points of interest or a combination of the three. This proposal is intended to meet th e
following program success indicators:
Making people feel welcome and safe in our parks
Deterring inappropriate activity
Gaining voluntary compliance of park codes and rules
Reducing the number of annual vandalism incidents
Reducing annual costs to repair/replace damaged landscape & infrastructure
•
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
7
The Mayor is proposing to allocate $5.1 million toward a Public Lands Park Ranger program. Funding for the program will
be partially supported through the use of eligible salary restoration dollars. The program will help ensure park safety,
including homeless outreach in the parks.
The Program will include the addition of nineteen employees in the Public Lands Department. The positions are two Park
Ranger Sergeants, sixteen Park Ranger Officers and one support person. The projected annual cost for personnel including
uniforms, training and operational costs is $2,350,983. The amen dment proposes to add these positions on January 1 at a
cost of $1,175,491 for the current fiscal year.
The proposed funding will also support one-time costs to implement the program of $401,800, including the purchase of
three trucks and one light response vehicle. Funding for personnel and ongoing costs will be transferred to the General
Fund while funding for the vehicles will be transferred to Fleet.
This funding will be established through a capture of funding for salary restoration from the current and future fiscal years.
C-2: ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness– CCP
Rapid Intervention Team (See Item A-13 & E-5)
Misc Grants $164,750.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
In September 2020, Mayor Mendenhall launched the Community Commitment Program through the Homeless
Engagement and Response Team. The CCP prioritizes outreach to individuals experiencing homelessness while also
emphasizing the need to keep public spaces saf e, clean, and accessible to all. The first phase of the CCP was a 12-week
enhanced neighborhood cleaning program based on neighborhood hot spots reported in CitySourced via the SLC Mobile
app. The second phase, which has transitioned into an ongoing partne rship with Salt Lake County and over a dozen service
providers, focused on intensive encampment outreach of varying lengths of time depending on the size and other
characteristics of camps. After approximately 9 months of this second phase, the City and ou r partners have been in a
maintenance stage, during which the City has fewer large encampments but is still attempting to handle the nearly 6,000
CitySourced reports over this past year. This figure is triple the number of complaints reported in the app in years past.
To more effectively and rapidly address these complaints from residents and businesses, the Mayor is proposing the
creation of a Rapid Intervention Team coordinated through HEART. The HEART coordinator (via a position that was
funded by the Council in the FY23 budget) will ensure that complaints are responded to with the appropriate level of
outreach through the SLCPD’s CCC or VOA, SLCPD officers to standby if necessary, as well as a City cleaning team working
with Advantage Services. By having a dedicated team to respond, Public Services and Waste & Recycling employees will not
be pulled away from their regular duties, as they are currently when the County Health Department requires camp
abatement support. The Public Services and Waste and Recycling employees will also be available to respond to illegal
dumping complaints throughout the City.
The program will add three FTE’s for the Rapid Intervention Team. These employees will be covered in part the first year.
Section D: Housekeeping
D-1: Economic Development Loan Fund Move Housing -$100,000.00
Housing $100,000.00
GF $100,000.00
Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jolynn Walz / Randy Hillier
For Questions Please Include: Ben Kolendar, Loreno Riffo Jensen, Jolynn Walz, Randy Hillier
Under Budget Amendment #7 of FY 2021, $100,000 was appropriated to the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF)
within the Housing Fund (FC78) to provide funding for outdoor dining activities and events in the form of forgivable lo ans.
The purpose of these loans is to assist restaurants and bars recover from the financial effects of the pandemic by offering
funding to expand outdoor dining.
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
8
After further examination of the EDLF guidelines, DED was unable to provide forgivable loans . DED has determined that a
traditional grant program is the best way to distribute these funds to businesses and is proposing the $100,000 be moved
to a separate account, allowing DED to administer the grant program.
D-2: Increase Grant Fund Misc Grants $0.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
The annual budget proposed funding from the American Recovery Plan Act (ARPA) for revenue replacement. During
budget adoption, the expense was adjusted based on updated grant guidelines. This increased the expense side of the grant
fund, but recognition of the revenue was not included. This request adjusts the revenue side to recognize the revenue side
of the transaction in the Grant Fund.
This proposal will bring the Fund into balance in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
D-3: Premium Holiday – Other Funds Refuse $0.00
Golf $0.00
Fleet $0.00
IMS $0.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
The Premium Holiday was submitted with the budget with the transfer from the Insurance Fund, but the transfer into
other funds was not included. This amendment is to balance the inter-fund transfers.
D-4: GPS Housekeeping GF -$74,600.00
GF $74,600.00
Fleet $74,600.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dawn Valente
For Questions Please Include: Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk, Dawn Valente
For FY22 there is an accounting change to put the GPS fees for vehicles in the Fleet budget. We missed the piece to move
the current budgets over to Fleet. Public Services has a budget of $39,203; Public Lands has a budget of $26,797; and CAN
has a budget $8,600 that we need to move to Fleet.
D-5: Signage FTE Correction GF $51,847.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dawn Valente
For Questions Please Include: Lorna Vogt, Dawn Valente, John Vuyk
In the Mayor's Recommended Budget, an FTE for Signage for the Planning & Ecological Services Division was initially
approved, but later reduced . However, the funding was again inadvertently reduced at the Council level, thus doubling the
reduction. This housekeeping request is to replace the funding that was inadvertently cut from the Signage budget.
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
9
D-6: General Obligation Series 2021A Bonds CIP $23,400,000.00
Debt Service $200,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Brandon Bagley / Marina Scott
For Questions Please Include: Brandon Bagley, Marina Scott, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
In November 2018, voters authorized the issuance of up to $87 million in general obligation bonds to fund street
construction. The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021A will be issued in November 2021 as the third issuance of the
authorization. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the receipt of bond proceeds and the expenditure budget to
pay for construction of the street projects associated with the bonds. It also creates expenditure budget to pay the costs of
issuance for the bonds.
Bond proceeds will be allocated to five project cost centers in Fund 83 and one cost center in Fund 81 for the costs of
issuance associated with the bond. Two cost centers will receive $6,000,000 each for the 200 South Phase 1 & 2 (400 W to
900 E) projects. A third cost center will receive $6,800,000 for the 1100 East (900 S to Warnock Ave) project. The fourth
cost center will receive $1,600,000 for the 300 North (300 W to 1000 W) project. The fifth cost ce nter will receive
$3,000,000 for local streets. The proceeds to pay the costs of issuance associated with the bonds will be deposited to the
debt service cost center in Fund 81.
D-7: Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A Debt Service $10,665,000.00
Debt Service $10,400,000.00
Debt Service $4,900,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Brandon Bagley / Marina Scott
For Questions Please Include: Brandon Bagley, Marina Scott, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, were issued in June 2012 for the purpose of replacing the North
Temple Viaduct and improving North Temple Boulevard.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B, were issued in November 2013 for the purpose of financing a portion of
the costs of the Sugarhouse Streetcar and paying for the portion of various improvements to create a "greenway" within the
corridor.
The Series 2012A and 2013B bonds are being refunded with the Sales Tax Refunding Revenu e Bonds, Series 2021A. This
budget amendment will create the revenue budget for the receipt of bond proceeds and the expenditure budget to pay off
the old bonds and to pay the costs of issuance for the bonds. Two Local Building Authority bonds will also b e refunded by
the Series 2021A bonds. This budget amendment creates the budget for the transfer to the LBA to pay those off. A separate
budget amendment for the LBA is being submitted to create budget for the payoff of those bonds.
D-8: Budget Carry Forward GF $1,175,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk, Teresa Beckstrand
In the General Fund there were a number of budgets that did not have encumbrances at the close of fiscal year 2021 the
Administration would request Council approval to roll budget for the projects into fiscal year 2022. The budgets requested
are listed below:
CC CC Name OC OC Description Amount
0900503 Demographer Contract 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $50,000.00
0900925 Financial Risk Assessment 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $100,000.00
0900930 Gentrification Mitigation Study 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $100,000.00
0900705 Washington DC Contract 2324 Special Consultant $75,000.00
0900513 NW Northpoint Plan Airport 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $50,000.00
0900508 Home to Transit Program 2590 Other Expenses $800,000.00
TOTAL $1,175,000.00
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
10
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
E-1: ARPA Funding – Water and Sewer Infrastructure
Projects Misc Grants $2,000,000.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Laura Briefer, Mary Beth Thompson, John
Vuyk
The Mayor proposes to set aside $2 million for required matching funding as we prepare to apply for State funds for water
and sewer infrastructure projects.
E-2: ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness –Winter
Shelter Support Misc Grants $1,000,000.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
Mayor Mendenhall is proposing that the Council set aside approximately $1 million of the City’s Rescue Plan allocation for
emergency shelter needs. Such funds could be used to assist the shelter operator with operations costs or go toward other
expenses such as public safety or neighborhood mitigation.
E-3: ARPA Funding – Public Safety and Homeless
Outreach – Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park
Ranger program (See Item A-12, C-1 & E-4)
Misc Grants $443,677.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
Over the past few years, Public Lands has experienced a dramatic increase of individuals experiencing homelessness using
the parks for overnight camping. This vulnerable population also attracts an increase in people who prey upon them and
impact other park users with drug use, drug sales, and other crime. Public Lands employees have found themselves in the
middle of this extremely complex community crisis, without training or resources to work in this new environment. Public
Lands relies on the SLCPD to enforce camping and anti-loitering ordinances, to assist in clearing areas so staff can
complete their duties, and to respond to calls for public safety in parks. However, SLCPD has city -wide responsibilities
and is not always available for non-urgent park safety needs.
SLC Public Lands is proposing a Park Ranger program to maximize public safety, protect park resources, and to provide
services and information to park visitors. Park rangers may serve as law enforcement officers, environmental experts,
interpreter of cultural and historical points of interest or a combination of the three. This proposal is intended to meet t he
following program success indicators:
Making people feel welcome and safe in our parks
Deterring inappropriate activity
Gaining voluntary compliance of park codes and rules
Reducing the number of annual vandalism incidents
Reducing annual costs to repair/replace damaged landscape & infrastructure
The Mayor is proposing to allocate $5.1 million toward a Public Lands Park Ranger program. Funding for the program will
be partially supported through the use of eligible salary restoration dollars. The program will help ensure park safety,
including homeless outreach in the parks.
The Program will include the addition of nineteen employees in the Public Lands Department. The positions are two Park
Ranger Sergeants, sixteen Park Ranger Officers and one support person. The projected annual cost for personnel including
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
11
uniforms, training and operational costs is $2,350,983. The amendment proposes to add these positions on January 1 at a
cost of $1,175,491 for the current fiscal year.
The proposed funding will also support one-time costs to implement the program of $401,800, including the purchase of
three trucks and one light response vehicle. Funding for personnel and ongoing costs will be transferred to the General
Fund while funding for the vehicles will be transferred to Fleet.
This funding will be established through a capture of funding for salary restoration from the curren t fiscal year.
E-4: ARPA Funding – Public Safety and Homeless
Outreach – Public Lands Park Rangers (See Item A12, C-1
& E3)
Misc Grants $69,244.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
Over the past few years, Public Lands has experienced a dramatic increase of individuals experiencing homelessness using
the parks for overnight camping. This vulnerable population also attracts an increase in people who prey upon them and
impact other park users with drug use, drug sales, and other crime. Public Lands employees have found themselves in the
middle of this extremely complex community crisis, without training or resources to work in this new environment. Public
Lands relies on the SLCPD to enforce camping and anti-loitering ordinances, to assist in clearing areas so staff can
complete their duties, and to respond to calls for public safety in parks. However, SLCPD has city -wide responsibilities
and is not always available for non-urgent park safety needs.
SLC Public Lands is proposing a Park Ranger program to maximize public safety, protect park resources, and to provide
services and information to park visitors. Park rangers may serve as law enforcement officers, environmental experts,
interpreter of cultural and historical points of interest or a combination of the three. This proposal is intended to meet t he
following program success indicators:
Making people feel welcome and safe in our parks
Deterring inappropriate activity
Gaining voluntary compliance of park codes and rules
Reducing the number of annual vandalism incidents
Reducing annual costs to repair/replace damaged landscape & infrastructure
The Mayor is proposing to allocate $5.1 million toward a Public Lands Park Ranger program. Funding for the program will
be partially supported through the use of eligible salary restoration dollars. The program will help ensure park safety,
including homeless outreach in the parks.
The Program will include the addition of nineteen empl oyees in the Public Lands Department. The positions are two Park
Ranger Sergeants, sixteen Park Ranger Officers and one support person. The projected annual cost for personnel including
uniforms, training and operational costs is $2,350,983. The amendment proposes to add these positions on January 1 at a
cost of $1,175,491 for the current fiscal year.
The proposed funding will also support one-time costs to implement the program of $401,800, including the purchase of
three trucks and one light response vehicle. Funding for personnel and ongoing costs will be transferred to the General
Fund while funding for the vehicles will be transferred to Fleet.
This funding will be a direct charge to the ARPA grant..
E-5: ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness – CCP
Rapid Intervention Team (See Item A-13 & C-2) Misc Grants $160,500.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
12
In September 2020, Mayor Mendenhall launched the Community Commitment Program through the Homeless
Engagement and Response Team. The CCP prioritizes outreach to individuals experiencing homelessness while also
emphasizing the need to keep public spaces saf e, clean, and accessible to all. The first phase of the CCP was a 12-week
enhanced neighborhood cleaning program based on neighborhood hot spots reported in CitySourced via the SLC Mobile
app. The second phase, which has transitioned into an ongoing partne rship with Salt Lake County and over a dozen service
providers, focused on intensive encampment outreach of varying lengths of time depending on the size and other
characteristics of camps. After approximately 9 months of this second phase, the City and ou r partners have been in a
maintenance stage, during which the City has fewer large encampments but is still attempting to handle the nearly 6,000
CitySourced reports over this past year. This figure is triple the number of complaints reported in the app in years past.
To more effectively and rapidly address these complaints from residents and businesses, the Mayor is proposing the
creation of a Rapid Intervention Team coordinated through HEART. The HEART coordinator (via a position that was
funded by the Council in the FY23 budget) will ensure that complaints are responded to with the appropriate level of
outreach through the SLCPD’s CCC or VOA, SLCPD officers to standby if necessary, as well as a City cleaning team working
with Advantage Services. By having a dedicated team to respond, Public Services and Waste & Recycling employees will not
be pulled away from their regular duties, as they are currently when the County Health Department requires camp
abatement support. The Public Services and Waste and Recycling employees will also be available to respond to illegal
dumping complaints throughout the City.
The program will add three FTE’s for the Rapid Intervention Team. These employees will be covered in part the first year.
This funding will be established through a capture of funding for salary restoration from the current fiscal year.
E-6: ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness – CCP
Rapid Intervention Team (Police Support) Misc Grants $1,505,920.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
The Administration is requesting $1,505,920 of funding, to provide funding for Clean Neighborhoods Teams for the Police
Department to provide staffing to support the homeless encampment cleanup and camp re -establishment stabilization as
requested by the Salt Lake County Health Department. Police of ficers working extra overtime shifts will provide security to
ensure the cleanups can proceed in an environment that will be safe for all involved. Staffing numbers will vary depending
on the size, number of cleanups and the location.
Activity # days Officers # hours Rate Amount Requested
Major Cleanups 14 40 10 $65 $364,000
Minor Cleanups* 122 24 6 $65 $1,141,920
And area stabilization
Total Requested $1,505,920
*previously utilized on-duty resources that are no longer available
E-7: Pulled Prior to Submission to allow for the completion of
phase 2 of the Social Impact Investment
In Budget Amendment 4, Mayor Mendenhall proposes to allocate $150,000 in General Fund money to complete Phase 2 of
this study (Item A-9). Mayor Mendenhall further proposes that the City Council hold approximately $10 million of the
City’s Rescue Plan appropriation until the completion of Phase 2, when the City and Sorenson Impact Center have fully
completed a recommendation on the financial structure of the investment, including but not limited to the contributions of
private investors and the long-term financial viability of these programs. Because Rescue Plan funds need not be spent
until the end of 2024, Mayor respectfully requests that the Council leave a portion of the City’s funds un -allocated until the
completion of Phase 2, which is anticipated to t ake 6-9 months, at which point the Administration and Council can make
an informed decision on seed funding for this initiative. During this time, the Administration will also be working with
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
13
potential investment partners with the ultimate goal of funding a $100 million social impact project on the two
interventions Sorenson has identified as the most impactful to the long -term economic health of City residents.
E-8: ARPA Funding – CCP HEART Rapid Intervention Team Misc Grants $57,000.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk, Michelle
Hoon
To more effectively and rapidly address these complaints from residents and businesses, the Mayor is proposing the
creation of a Rapid Intervention Team coordinated through HEART. The HEART coordinator (via a position that was
funded by the Council in the FY23 budget) will ensure that complaints are responded to with the appropriate level of
outreach through the SLCPD’s CCC or VOA, SLCPD officers to standby if necessary, as well as a City cleaning team working
with Advantage Services. By having a dedicated team to respond, Public Services and Waste & Recycling employees will not
be pulled away from their regular duties, as they are currently when the County Health Department requires camp
abatement support. The Public Services and Waste and Recycling employees will also be available to respond to illegal
dumping complaints throughout the City.
Work will be coordinated with Advantage Services. The program will be monitored for the first six months to evaluate the
effectiveness of the service.
E-9: ARPA Funding – Westside Community Initiative Misc Grants $4,000,000.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Ben Kolendar, Danny Walz, Mary Beth
Thompson, John Vuyk
As a function of utilizing the tax differential collected by the Inland Port Authority and allocated to the RDA for affordabl e
housing, the RDA Board has endorsed the creation of an Urban Land Fund in order to develop and secure perpetual
housing affordability on the City’s west side. Under the direction of the RDA, the fund would look to maximize
opportunities for affordability in both rental housing and home ownership as well as limited commercial uses
within mixed use developments. RDA staff is currently working on potential options for the structure of the land fund. This
process includes the evaluation of opportunities for community wealth building and cooperative housing models within a
perpetual housing fund. The allocation of this funding source is intended to offset the impacts on the west side from the
Inland Port development. The opportunity of this program is to strengthen the commun ity by providing a mechanism to
help reverse the historical impacts of disinvestment and inequality on the residents in this area of the City. Mayor
Mendenhall proposes the allocation of $4 million in seed funds for implementing the policy proposals that emerge from
the current study, including the following goals:
Develop Land with a Long-Term Approach to Continuously Serve a Community-Defined Purpose
WCI will take a long-term approach to land development and community building so that the RDA may retain the
fee ownership to and a reversionary interest in the property. By ground leasing to development partners, the RDA
will provide an opportunity to receive revenue generation to serve other public benefits.
Create Opportunities for Revenue Generation while Balancing the Implementation of Public
Benefits
WCI will strive to balance the development of property with the incorporation of public benefits. Benefits such as
affordable housing and below-market commercial space which generate limited or no cash flow would potentially
be subsidized with land uses that generate positive cash flow. Revenue generated by projects and received by the
RDA will then be reinvested back into the WCI with the goal of furthering shared prosperity.
Assist the Westside in Mitigating Gentrification and Displacement
WCI will acquire land with the goal of holding it for the community in perpetuity, thereby removing land from the
speculative market so that it serves low and moderate-income residents in perpetuity. Housing will remain
affordable even as neighborhood change occurs and gentrification pressures mount, which protects families from
displacement.
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
14
Give Lower Income Households the Opportunity to Build Wealth Through Ownership
WCI will create opportunities for families to buy homes at affordable prices by focusing on a shared-equity model.
A shared equity model offers an alternative form of ownership that provides benefits traditional markets cannot,
such as long-term housing affordability and the ability for low and moderate -income families to build
equity. When families decide to sell, they will receive their portion of the appreciation but the RDA remains as the
land owner and is in the position to continue to sell the home at a below-market price, making it affordable to
another family of limited means. Keeping the home affordable, from family to family, will benefit future
generations by acting as a steppingstone for low-income families to go from renting to building wealth.
Engage Community Members in Development Decisions
The RDA will involve the community in the planning and goals regarding long term land use and housing
development. This can translate into residents actively involved in creating positive change within their
communities and projects that reflect the value of its residents. The result will be projects that incorporate a
shared mission and vision with the community.
Leverage Resources for Other Neighborhood Development Purposes
Revenues acquired through ground leases or partnerships could contribute to othe r purposes, including
subsidizing deeply affordable housing, below-market commercial space, infrastructure, public art, etc.
Collaborate with Other Partners to Broaden the Pool of Funding and Expertise
The RDA would actively work to acquire outside funding sources and professional resources by bringing together
financial institutions, the private sector, nonprofits, public officials, other government agencies, researchers, and
practitioners to collaborate on community and economic development activities.
Carry Out Efforts with a “Collective Impact” Approach
The RDA will continuously evaluate how projects work together to address common goals through a “collective
impact” approach that produces measurable results. These measurable results will be tracked and reported on to
promote data-driven and outcome-based decisions.
E-10: ARPA Funding – Community Grants Misc Grants $4,000,000.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Ben Kolendar, Blake Thomas, Mary Beth
Thompson, John Vuyk
Community grants
Mayor Mendenhall proposes an allocation of $ 4 million toward community grants. These grants will give community
organizations and local businesses the opportunity to propose to the City what COVID -related problems they are trying to
solve City staff and volunteers from relevant City boards and commissions would select grantees at the conclusion of an
open solicitation process. The Administration proposes to split these grant funds into two categories, with half of the
allocation going to Economic Development and half to Community and Neighborhoods. These departments will scope the
challenge facing residents and businesses, and launch two solicitations seeking proposals on the COVID -related problem
that the applicant desires to address under the following broad categories:
o CAN grants -- Nonprofit support (to be further refined by CAN): This could include programs like
retraining of displaced workers, nonprofit legal services for eviction assistance, expanded educational
opportunities, resources to mitigate the digital divide, access to healthcare for underserved populations,
mental health assistance, etc.
o DED grants -- Business assistance (to be further refined by DED): This could include grants for
businesses not included in other government programs during the pandemic, especially small and local
businesses, and support for artist/artisan businesses.
Section F: Donations
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
15
Section G: Consent Agenda
Consent Agenda #2
G-1: Police Department Asset Forfeiture Grant Misc. Grants $1,500.00
Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond
For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Jordan Smith, Shellie Dietrich
The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for and received a $1,500 grant award from the State of Utah, Commission
on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), under the State Asset For feiture Grant (SAFG) program. The SAFG program
funds crime prevention and law enforcement activities within specific guidelines. CCJJ developed the SAFG program as a
means of evaluating and distributing state forfeiture funds.
The funds will be used for confidential informant funds to enhance investigations in narcotics-related cases.
A public hearing was held 9/7/21 for this grant application.
G-2: Utah Department of Health - Bureau of Emergency Medical
Services (EMS)grant, FY22 Per Capita Allocation Misc. Grants $10,250.00
Department: Emergency Management Prepared By: Brittany Blair/ Melyn Osmond
For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Clint Rasmussen, Brittany Blair
The Fire Department applied for and was awarded $10,250 of grant funding from the Utah Department of Health, Bureau
of Emergency Medical Services. This funding will be used towards the purchase of a 12 -Lead Cardiac Monitor and medical
supplies relating to the provision of Emergency Medical Services as funding permits.
A Public Hearing was held on 2/16/21 for the grant applications on this award.
G-3: State of Utah, CCJJ (Commission on Criminal and Juvenile
Justice), Jurisdictions with Halfway Houses and Parole Violator
Centers Grant, Law Enforcement Services Account (LESA)
Misc. Grants $295,571.00
Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond
For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Clint Rasmussen, Brittany Blair
The Police Department has applied for and been awarded a $295,570 grant from the State of Utah, Commission on
Criminal and Juvenile Justice, in support of the Jurisdictions with Halfway Houses and Parole Violator Centers grant.
This grant provides funding for law enforcement agencies that provide services directly to areas with halfwa y houses or
parole violator centers, or both. The Police Department will use these funds for law enforcement overtime related to
reducing criminal activity including targeted enforcement operations, increased patrol response, and responding to mental
health calls for service. The Department will also utilize funds for case transcription services, six overt camera units and
maintenance/repairs/supplies for units in the Department's camera program.
A public hearing was held 9/7/21 for this grant application.
G-4: Utah State Office for Victims of Crime, 2021-2023 VOCA Victims
of Crime Act Grant Misc. Grants $364,162.48
Department: Police Department Prepared By: Wendy Isom/ Melyn Osmond
For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Wendy Isom, Jordan Smith, Shellie Dietrich
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
16
The Police Department applied for and received a $364,162.48 grant from the State of Utah, Office for Victims of Crime
under the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) program, to be used for the continuation of the Victim Advocate Program. These
funds will be used to pay for salary and fringe for 4 existing full-time Victim Advocate positions and all of the part-time
Victim Advocate positions. This grant also covers the costs for Rita, the program's facility dog. Additionally, there are
supplies for the program, emergency funds for assisting victims, and training for Advocate staff.
No match is required by the funding agency.
VOCA funds cover local and national conferences and trainings needed to meet statutory training requirements for the
Victim Advocates. It also provides and emergency fund that can be used when no other victim funding options are available
- these funds can be used for food, clothing, shelter, transportation and 911 phones for victims of violent crime.
Additionally, it provides for supplies such as Victim Advocate brochures, Traumatic Death Handbooks, cell phone costs,
etc.
A $109,938.89 match is required which will be satisfied by the salary and benefits of City funded Victim Advocates and the
Program Coordinator. In-kind matching funds are provided by the student interns/volunteers that participate in the
Victim Advocate Program.
A Public Hearing was held 9/7/21 on this grant application.
G-5: Department of Workforce Services, Housing & Community
Development Division, FY22 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation
Grant Program
Misc. Grants $370,735.00
Department: Community and Neighborhoods Prepared By: Michelle Hoon / Melyn Osmond
For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Michelle Hoon, Brent Beck
The Community and Neighborhoods Dept. applied for and received State Department of Workforce Services funding of
$370,735 to continue efforts to encourage businesses, residents, Homeless Resource Center (HRC) operators and guests to
participate in constructive community engagement opportunities and encourage service-based interventions in order to
successfully integrate the HRCs into the fabric of their host neighborhoods and ensure the safety of those
neighborhoods.
The SLC Mitigation team currently consists of a SLC Community Engagement Coordinator, VOA Business and Community
Liaison, and VOA Outreach Case Manager. This application requests to continue the current team and expand the team to
include an additional VOA Business and Community Liaison, additional VOA Outreach Case Manager, and a VOA
Outreach Peer Support Specialist, and three new positions as part of the City's existing Downtown Ambassador program -
tailored to the areas surrounding the HRCs (King, Miller, and Youth).
A Public Hearing will be scheduled for the application on this grant.
G-6: Utah State Department of Public Safety - 2021 Emergency
Management Performance Grant (EMPG) Misc. Grants $42,500.00
Department: Emergency Management Services Prepared By: Audrey Pierce / Melyn Osmond
For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Audrey Pierce, Clint Rasmussen
The Emergency Management Services Division received a $42,500 FY2021 EMPG grant from the State of Utah,
Department of Public Safety. This grant is awarded on an annual basis to ju risdictions to help offset costs of planning and
updating emergency preparedness plans, conduct emergency preparedness exercises and produce materials and other
media for public educational outreach and training pertaining to emergency preparedness.
SLC's population increases from 180,000 to an estimated 310,000 each workday. Should a disaster occur during the
workday, employees become a part of the SLC emergency response, but are not trained to assist themselves or others.
These funds will offset costs in providing National Incident Management System (NIMS) training to SLC staff with
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
17
emergency response responsibilities during a disaster or other significant event. The funds will be used to fund community
preparedness activities, purchase training materials, supplies and equipment including books, brochures, handouts, etc.
The grant requires a 50% match which will be satisfied with the Community Preparedness Coordinator's time and
budgeted for within Emergency Managements general fund.
A public hearing will be held for this grant application.
G-7: Cities of Service, Johns Hopkins, Justice for the Jordan Grant,
Love Your Block Misc. Grants $100,000.00
Department: Office of the Mayor Prepared By: Hailey Leek / Melyn Osmond
For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Hailey Leek
The office of the Mayor applied for and received $100,000 in grant funding for the Justice for the Jordan, Love your Block
grant.
The grant provides:
1. $60,000 to hire a Love your Block Fellow for 2 years.
2. $40,000 to distribute to the community as mini grants
3. The City is also required to engage 2 AmeriCorps VISTA volunteers, one each year of the grant.
4. The City also receives technical assistance from Cities of Service
The Cities of Service Love Your Block program connects mayor’s offices with community residents to revitalize their
neighborhoods one block at a time. Typically, cities implementing Love Your Block invite community groups to identify
priority projects and award mini-grants to support volunteer-fueled solutions that the community can implement. The City
identifies a problem and then engages with volunteers within the neighborhoods of focus and engages them early in the
project design phase as well as implementation and evaluation. The City identified the neighborhoods adjacent to the
Jordan River in Glendale (census tract 1026, 1027.01, & 1028.01) as the target area.
A public hearing will be held for this grant application.
G-8: Utah State Office for Victims of Crime, Violence Against Women
Act, Domestic Violence Victim Advocate Misc. Grants $101,039.00
Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Scott Fisher / Melyn Osmond
For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Katherine Lewis, Scott Fisher
The City Prosecutors office applied for and received a $101,039 grant from the State of Utah, Office for Victims of Crime
under the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) program, to be used for the Violence Against Women’s Act to fund Salt Lake City
Prosecutor Domestic Violence Victim Advocate.
The Prosecutor’s Office is requesting a Victim Advocate to assist and support victims of domestic violence as their cases
move to the prosecution and adjudication phases. The services include information, education and advocacy through the
case and prosecution, assistance with victim impact statements, support and accompaniment to court and meetings with
investigators and prosecutors. The Victim Advocate assist in post release safety planning, preparation for court
appearances, and jail release agreements.
Until this year, Salt Lake County District Attorney Victim Services has provided this support for victims whose cases are
adjudicate in Salt Lake City Justice Court. Funding cutbacks required the county to reassign the advocates to County
prosecutions. Salt Lake City is applying for this new city position to fill the gap in services.
The match is $12,630 each fiscal year, for a total of $25,260 for the two-year performance period of the
grant. The match is met with cash available in the Office of the Attorney’s budget.
A Public Hearing was held 6/15/21 on this grant application
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
18
Section I: Council Added Items
FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 TOTAL
Taking Care of the City:
Revenue Loss (Based on Calendar Year Calculations)11,432,646$ 34,372,399$ -$ 45,805,045$ 1
Salary: Bonus 1,193,000$ 1,193,000$
Salary: Police Retention and Recruitment 7,798,233$ 7,798,233$
Council Adopted ARP Allocation
- Special Projects Assistant for Community Commitment Program (CAN)93,829$ 93,829$
- Youth & Family Community and Program Manager (from BA#2) (CAN)90,633$ 90,633$
- Youth & Family COVID Programming Continuation (CAN)711,350$ 711,350$
- Economic Development Strategic Plan (Economic Development)50,000$ 50,000$
- Economic Development Staff (Economic Development)290,000$ 290,000$
- Grant Administrator (Finance)101,020$ 101,020$
- Grant Manager (Finance)95,000$ 95,000$
- Apprenticeship Program (All Departments)1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
- MRT Expansion [6 Months] (Fire)136,762$ 136,762$
- MRT Expansion [One-Time $46,700] (Fire)46,700$ 46,700$
Water and Sewer Infrastructure 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$
Council Added BA2 - Annex Building Renovation for Odyssey House 500,000$ 500,000$
Homelessness and Public Safety: the City's Greatest Current Need
Clean Neighborhoods teams 1,505,920$ 1,505,920$
Public Lands Park Rangers (from Salary Restoration)1,508,044$ 1,545,746$ 792,195$ 3,845,985$ 2
Public Lands Park Rangers (One-time directly from ARPA funding)69,247$
CCP clean-up 325,250$ 329,500$ 164,750$ 819,500$
HEART 57,000$ 290,000$ 290,000$ 637,000$
Advantage Services Contract -$
Emergency Shelter Set Aside 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
Building Community Resilience
Social Impact Investment 10,000,000$ 10,000,000$ 3
Urban Land Fund 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$
Community Grants
Community Grants 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$
TOTAL 1,193,000$ 36,811,634$ 46,537,645$ 1,246,945$ 85,719,977$
Amount of Distibution 85,411,572$
Salt Lake City
ARPA Budgeted Funding
FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 TOTAL
Salt Lake City
ARPA Budgeted Funding
Items listed in Blue are new proposals.
1 Projected Amount. This funding is not allocated to projects, creates flexible spending dollars.
Revenue Loss Dollars can potentially cover all or a portion of these expenses in FY2023 and FY2024
Police Retention and Recruitment (Salary Enhancements)7,993,189$ 4,096,509$ 12,089,698$
Special Projects Assistant for Community Commitment Program (CAN)96,175$ 49,290$ 145,464$
Youth & Family Community and Program Manager (from BA#2) (CAN)92,899$ 47,611$ 140,509$
Youth & Family COVID Programming Continuation (CAN)729,134$ 373,681$ 1,102,815$
Economic Development Strategic Plan (Economic Development)51,250$ 26,266$ 77,516$
Economic Development Staff (Economic Development)297,250$ 152,341$ 449,591$
Grant Administrator (Finance)103,546$ 53,067$ 156,613$
Grant Manager (Finance)97,375$ 49,905$ 147,280$
Apprenticeship Program (All Departments)1,025,000$ 525,313$ 1,550,313$
MRT Expansion [6 Months] (Fire)140,181$ 71,843$ 212,024$
Park Ranger Program 805,237$ 383,297$ 1,188,534$
Fiscal Year 2022 One-Time Revenues
ARPA Revenue Loss 11,432,646$ 11,432,646$
One Time Use of General Fund Balance 15,335,334$ 15,335,334$
One Time Use of General Fund Balance (FOF)2,129,483$ 2,129,483$
46,157,818$
2 Park Ranger Program
Annual Costs 1,175,491$ 2,350,983$ 1,175,492$
One-Time Costs 401,800$
TOTAL 1,577,291$ 2,350,983$ 1,175,492$
Available Salary Restoration Funding 1,508,044$ 1,545,746$ 792,195$
Difference (Another Funding Source is needed, possibly revenue loss)(805,237)$ (383,297)$
3 Social Impact Investment
Focus will be on two specific interventions -- early childhood education and workforce training -- that will increase residents’ access to opportunity and
economic mobility.
Request to hold allocation of approximately $10 mil until the completion of Phase 2. Can be adjusted based on actual spending.
Impact Fees ‐ Summary Confidential
Data pulled 7/27/2021
Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area
Area Cost Center UnAllocated
Cash Notes:
Impact fee - Police 8484001 525,991$ A
Impact fee - Fire 8484002 1,084,253$ B
Impact fee - Parks 8484003 9,384,420$ C
Impact fee - Streets 8484005 5,571,233$ D
16,565,896$
Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month
202007 (Jul2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202008 (Aug2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202009 (Sep2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202010 (Oct2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202011 (Nov2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202012 (Dec2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202101 (Jan2021)2021Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202102 (Feb2021)2021Q3 16,273$ -$ -$ -$ 16,273$
202103 (Mar2021)2021Q3 16,105$ -$ -$ -$ 16,105$
202104 (Apr2021)2021Q4 1,836$ -$ -$ -$ 1,836$
202105 (May2021)2021Q4 14,542$ -$ -$ -$ 14,542$
202106 (Jun2021)2021Q4 30,017$ -$ -$ -$ 30,017$ Current Month
202107 (Jul2021)2022Q1 10,107$ -$ -$ -$ 10,107$
202108 (Aug2021)2022Q1 6,804$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 6,804$
202109 (Sep2021)2022Q1 5,554$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 5,554$
202110 (Oct2021)2022Q2 3,106$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 3,106$
202111 (Nov2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202112 (Dec2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202201 (Jan2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202202 (Feb2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202203 (Mar2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202204 (Apr2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202205 (May2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202206 (Jun2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202207 (Jul2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202208 (Aug2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202209 (Sep2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202210 (Oct2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202211 (Nov2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202212 (Dec2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202301 (Jan2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202302 (Feb2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202303 (Mar2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202304 (Apr2023)2023Q4 118$ -$ -$ -$ 118$
202305 (May2023)2023Q4 469$ -$ -$ -$ 469$
202306 (Jun2023)2023Q4 276$ -$ -$ -$ 276$
Total, Currently Expiring through June 2021 78,774$ -$ -$ -$ 78,774$
Notes
^1 FY 2023Calendar
Month
7/27/21: We are currently in a refund situation. We will refund $15k in the next 3 months without offsetting expendituresFiscal Year 2021FY 2022Fiscal
Quarter
E = A + B + C + D
Police Fire Parks Streets
Total
Impact Fees Confidential
Data pulled 7/27/2021 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC
Police
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Police Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Police Allocation
Encumbrances Sum of Police Allocation YTD Expenditures
Sum of Police Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
Impact fee - Streets Westside 8484005 -$ -$ -$ -$
Police'sConsultant'sContract 8419205 5,520$ 3,507$ 1,955$ 58$
Police Impact Fee Refunds 8421102 438,897$ -$ -$ 438,897$
Police Refunds 8418013 539,687$ -$ 69,291$ 470,396$ A
PolicePrecinctLandAquisition 8419011 1,410,243$ 239,836$ -$ 1,170,407$
Grand Total 2,440,385$ 289,381$ 71,246$ 2,079,759$
Fire
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Fire refunds 8416007 82,831$ -$ -$ 82,831$
Fire Station #14 8415001 6,650$ 6,083$ 567$ -$
Fire Station #14 8416006 52,040$ -$ 7,428$ 44,612$
Fire Station #3 8415002 1,568$ -$ -$ 1,568$
Fire Station #3 8416009 1,050$ 96$ 485$ 469$
Impact fee - Fire 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$
Impact fee - Streets Westside 8484005 -$ -$ -$ -$
Study for Fire House #3 8413001 15,700$ -$ -$ 15,700$ B
FireTrainingCenter 8419012 46,550$ -$ 46,550$ -$
Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 10,965$ 4,883$ 6,024$ 58$
FY20 FireTrainingFac. 8420431 66,546$ -$ 10,516$ 56,031$
Fire Station #3 Debt Service 8421200 541,106$ -$ 541,106$ -$
Fire Station #14 Debt Service 8421201 339,172$ -$ 339,172$ -$
Grand Total 1,164,177$ 11,063$ 951,846$ 201,268$
Parks
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Impact fee - Parks 8484003 -$ -$ -$ -$
JR Boat Ram 8420144 125,605$ 15,561$ 110,044$ -$
Three Creeks Confluence 8419101 173,017$ -$ 173,017$ -$
Cnty #2 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420426 515,245$ 88$ 515,157$ -$
Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 7,643$ 4,815$ 2,786$ 42$
Folsom Trail/City Creek Daylig 8417010 766$ -$ 620$ 146$
Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 24,056$ 23,000$ 526$ 530$ C
Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 16,087$ -$ 14,977$ 1,110$
Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 11,856$ -$ 10,287$ 1,570$
9line park 8416005 86,322$ 19,702$ 64,364$ 2,256$
Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$
Warm Springs Off Leash 8420132 27,000$ 15,811$ 6,589$ 4,600$
Fairmont Park Lighting Impr 8418004 50,356$ 43,597$ 605$ 6,155$
FY Parks and Public Lands Compreh 8417008 7,500$ -$ -$ 7,500$
Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 27,478$ 4,328$ 14,683$ 8,467$
Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 15,939$ -$ 6,589$ 9,350$
ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 10,830$ -$ -$ 10,830$
Park refunds 8416008 11,796$ -$ -$ 11,796$
IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 350,000$ 1,905$ 291,986$ 56,109$
Parks Impact Fees 8418015 102,256$ -$ 875$ 101,381$
UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 200,000$ 22,524$ 64,916$ 112,560$
FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 727,000$ 574,709$ 4,080$ 148,211$
9Line Orchard 8420136 195,045$ -$ -$ 195,045$
Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 225,000$ -$ 753$ 224,247$
Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 275,000$ -$ -$ 275,000$
Bridge to Backman 8418005 350,250$ 10,285$ 59,974$ 279,990$
Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$
Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 400,000$ 7,790$ 11,523$ 380,688$
Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 431,000$ -$ -$ 431,000$
Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 490,830$ -$ 1,142$ 489,688$
Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 540,732$ 1,883$ 16,843$ 522,007$
Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,145,394$ 34,222$ 50,965$ 1,060,208$
Fisher Carriage House 8420130 1,098,764$ -$ -$ 1,098,764$
Pioneer Park 8419150 3,442,199$ 229,022$ 98,295$ 3,114,882$
Grand Total 11,415,591$ 1,009,242$ 1,521,594$ 8,884,756$
Streets
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 152,500$ 152,500$ -$ -$
IF Roundabout 2000 E Parleys 8420122 455,000$ -$ 455,000$ -$
Impact fee - Streets Westside 8484005 -$ -$ -$ -$
500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 41,027$ 32,718$ 8,309$ -$
Transportation Safety Imp 8418007 147,912$ -$ 147,912$ -$
500 to 700 S 8418016 575,000$ 96,637$ 478,363$ -$
Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ 13,000$ -$ -$
700 South Reconstruction 8414001 310,032$ -$ 310,032$ -$ D
700 South Reconstruction 8415004 1,157,506$ 2,449$ 1,155,057$ -$
LifeOnState Imp Fee 8419009 124,605$ -$ 124,605$ -$
Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 22,360$ -$ 20,916$ 1,444$
Gladiola Street 8406001 16,544$ 13,865$ 435$ 2,244$
Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 210,752$ 87,472$ 115,100$ 8,180$
Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 39,176$ 17,442$ 9,360$ 12,374$
Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 125,000$ -$ 89,608$ 35,392$
Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 250,000$ 20,697$ 191,220$ 38,083$
1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$
Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$
Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 200,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$
TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 375,000$ -$ 72,947$ 302,053$
IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$
Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 2,858,090$ 1,469,774$ 607,870$ 780,446$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8419008 251,316$ -$ 29,628$ 221,688$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8420105 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 875,000$ -$ -$ 875,000$
Grand Total 9,292,247$ 2,206,554$ 3,816,363$ 3,269,330$
Total 24,312,401$ 3,516,240$ 6,361,049$ 14,435,112$
E = A + B + C + D
TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE
9,384,420$
5,571,233$
16,565,896$
8484002
8484003
8484005
525,991$
$1,084,253
8484001
UnAllocated
Budget
Amount
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Allison Rowland
Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:November 16, 2021
RE: INFORMATIONAL: HEALTH CARE INNOVATION BLUEPRINT
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has been working to develop and refine a “blueprint” for supporting
businesses in the health care innovation sector, as well as students who may be encouraged to
pursue careers in this sector through internships and other opportunities. A Blueprint for
Growing Salt Lake City’s Health Care Innovation Economy is the product of work by the
Gardener Policy Institute with 20 local stakeholders drawn from economic development and
health care innovation, including Council Member Dan Dugan and two City department directors
(Blake Thomas and Danny Walz), who met for five discussions over the spring and summer of
2021. Since then, according to the transmittal, the Gardener Institute and City Department of
Economic Development (DED) staff have met with other organizations and requested feedback on
the ideas and draft recommendations in the Blueprint. While this briefing is informational only,
the Administration is asking for Council guidance on this work, as this could be considered a
midpoint in this process, analogous to the Council’s master plan check-in process. Full
implementation of the Blueprint may require Council approval of new ongoing City budget
expenses or zoning changes in coming years.
In summary, the reasoning behind this new City initiative is as follows:
-The Department of Economic Development (DED) is already working through the
Mayor’s Tech Lake City initiative and the State’s Biohive initiative to connect and
promote the growing presence of health care innovation firms in the SLC area.
-Jobs in the health care innovation sector are characterized as offering higher-than-
average wages and multiple entry points at different salary levels, in addition to
opportunities for internships and apprenticeships for high school and college
students.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: November 16, 2021
Set Date: n/a
Public Hearing: n/a
Potential Action: n/a
Page | 2
-Through the Tech Lake City initiative, the Administration wishes to help provide
better access to City residents from underserved and diverse communities to
apprenticeships and internships that can lead to high-paying jobs.
-The focus on health care innovation forms part of the Administration’s shift to a
“more proactive” and “people-centered” approach to the City’s economic
development.
Goal of the briefing: Review and provide guidance on the Blueprint for Growing Salt Lake
City’s Health Care Innovation Economy.
ADDITIONAL AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.Blueprint Recommendations. The recommendations in the Blueprint are summarized
below.
1. Brand, Promote, & Grow
Build global brand
Increase awareness of job opportunities
Highlight successes
2. Increase Investment
Maximize industry partnership
Capitalize on private capital
Target social impact investments
3. Emphasize Pathways & Partnerships
Create education-to-workforce partnerships
Connect pathways to education and employment
Identify alternative pathways to education and employment
4. Strengthen Foundation & Remove Barriers
Create a baseline
Reduce business barriers (review City regulations and zoning)
Inventory R&D opportunities
Ensure lab and office space is available
The Blueprint does not define which of these activities are foreseen as exclusive
responsibilities of the City, and which would involve partnerships with organizations outside
the City. In response to a staff question, DED stated,
“Most of this is done through partnerships and convening. The most
strategic consideration for the City as it pertains to potential Council
action will be the ‘strengthen foundation’ category. The council has already
heard the proposed zoning changes as an early example.”
See Policy Question F for more on the topic of role clarity for the future.
Page | 3
B.Potential Funding Requests. DED stated that City funding and other City resources may
be requested through the annual budget process to implement aspects of the Blueprint.
Examples they included the following:
●“Ongoing support for the BioHive may be a consideration the
administration might recommend to the Council
●Staff time to coordinate initiatives and convene partners around
recommended priorities in the document
●Support for BioUtah may be a consideration the administration might
recommend to the Council
●Staff time to conceptualize supporting lab and office space development
to support this industry may result in considerations to come before the
Council”
The Department also noted that some of the organizations whose members participated in
Blueprint’s Advisory Group might contribute to City initiatives in the future, but that “No
expectations have been set in this document for funding commitments.”
The Blueprint itself suggests some additional potential sources of funding beyond the City
(page 5):
“Local, regional, and national banks, along with Utah’s many industrial loan
corporations (ILCs) and other financial institutions, provide opportunities for
tapping into Community Reinvestment Act funds and other sources. Partnering
with the Federal Reserve is one way to convene and educate banks about the
City’s people focused approach and how it offers new prospects for investing in
meaningful and lasting community and social impact. In addition, convening
an ongoing advisory group of local, national, and global funders with industry
expertise can help Salt Lake City officials understand funding structures and
opportunities, brainstorm and strategize funding approaches, and seek advice
on economic development efforts.”
C.Potential Benefits. The Blueprint states that over 83% of jobs located within Salt Lake City
currently are held by residents of other jurisdictions. DED does appear to recognize, at least
tacitly, that there is potential for “spillover” benefits from its focus on the health care
innovation sector to residents of surrounding jurisdictions. In response to staff questions
about whether, for example, new jobs in health care innovation or internship possibilities
intended for underserved high school and college students—which would be funded in part by
Salt Lake City taxpayers—could end up benefitting people who live in the surrounding
metropolitan areas, the Department responded as follows:
“Choosing a fast growing, high wage, economically stable, and
entrepreneurial & capital centered industry as well as an industry with
multiple entry points for career opportunities makes sense and since the
concentration of these jobs and careers are here, the city has the
opportunity to take a lead role in coordinating stakeholders.”
“This exercise [of creating the Blueprint] has already brought together
partners at the [Salt Lake City] school district and companies in
healthcare innovation. The City seeks to advance this work through
aligning those partners with STEM pathways and classroom
engagement opportunities. One lever could be to place requirements on
Page | 4
any considerations regarding ongoing funding for the BioHive. Our
outreach is focused on the community groups who interact and provide
services to the underserved communities and is aligned with the Biohive
and other partners in education, industry, and other organizations in
the community.”
“This effort acknowledges and emphasizes that economic opportunities
in SLC aren’t equally available despite our economic strengths as the
capital city. Those decisions will be made by the companies, though the
Council may consider DEI requirements and engagement with diverse
community organizations for future BioHive funding considerations.”
D.Additional Information
1. The Blueprint mentions that BioHive has raised more than $1,100,000 in public and
private investment. DED reports that these funds have come from the State
legislature (through GoUtah), the University of Utah, EDCUtah, and World Trade
Center Utah, as well as private companies in the industry. The Department describes
BioHive as
“[…] the story telling arm for health care innovation in Utah focused on
branding and marketing the industry. They are working with the city and other
stakeholders to support apprenticeships and workforce development programs
with the city and other groups across the state. They write articles, podcasts,
and run social media accounts, provide marketing collateral, hold events, and
are leading diversity and inclusion initiatives through their parity pledge
focused on women and people of color.”
2. In response to a staff question about the potential economic risks and costs of City
government choosing a single industry for its focus, DED responded, in part:
“In practice, an economy with only one industry is exposed to greater
economic risk as its success is correlated with industry success, rather
than broader economic success; however, Utah is the most diverse
economy in the United States with a 2019 Hatchman Index of 97.3 -
meaning that the state is correlated with the wider economy of the
United States to a very large extent. Within the State, Salt Lake County
has the highest Hatchman Index rating of 94, so these risks are very
minimal and in fact add value to our efforts as there is diversity within
the industry focus as a result of our existing diverse economy.”
The Department also stressed the importance of data that refers to the existing
concentration of these types of businesses in the City relative to other places, and the
sector’s recent high growth rates.
POLICY QUESTIONS
A. The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether the Blueprint’s Advisory Group will
remain available to provide feedback on questions and unanticipated complexities that may
arise in DED’s work, and how that feedback process might occur. The Council may also wish
Page | 5
to request regular feedback from the Advisory Group to provide advance notice and input on
any potential funding requests that may arise.
B. Would the Council like to request the Administration develop an implementation strategy for
new City tasks associated with the Blueprint’s Recommendations, and that this include some
elaboration on potential future budget and staffing requests?
C. Would the Council like to request information on the potential environmental costs of
significant expansion in the health care innovation sector, particularly on research, testing,
and medical laboratories? For example, would the need for hazardous waste disposal services
increase? Other sustainability considerations could include water use and the potential need
for testing for toxins released into the water and air. The Council could request that the
Department of Economic Development engage with the City’s Sustainability Department to
ensure these concerns are addressed.
D. The Blueprint mentions that Salt Lake City has “adopted the Opportunity Index as a measure
of how well economic growth is distributed to the City’s residents.” The Council may wish to
ask the Administration about efforts referred to in the Blueprint to adapt this metric for use at
the City level, given that it is computed by OpportunityIndex.org only at the county and state
levels. The Council also may wish to ask DED to develop additional, City-specific, short-term
measures of the effectiveness of their work to achieve the goals outlined in the Blueprint. The
Department has indicated that it is working with IMS on developing a more City-focused
approach. It is not clear, though, whether this may require more staff and/or budget for IMS
given their already-full workload. It is also unclear if IMS would be collecting this data or
interpreting existing data in a usable way.
E. The Council may wish to request the Administration research and consider options for
ensuring that the bulk of the expected benefits of the City’s support for the health care
innovation sector accrue to City residents, rather than the broader metropolitan area.
F. The Council might wish to consider specifying that any future funding requests for the health
care innovation initiative reflect existing government roles, responsibilities, and funding
sources. For example, that the Council would consider any allocation for the activities
described in the Blueprint with the understanding that:
The City’s investment will not supplant existing State or private programs and
funding, or the potential for those programs’ independent expansion.
Rigorous and transparent metrics will be developed to show goals are reached,
particularly that the opportunity index score is improving in areas where it
currently lags.
ATTACHMENT
Attachment C1. Department of Economic Development Responses to Council Staff Questions
Attachment C1. Responses of Department of Economic Development to Council Staff
Questions.
1. Of the recommendations listed in the Blueprint (summarized below), which are foreseen as exclusive
responsibility of the City, and which would involve partnerships with organizations outside the City?
- Brand, Promote, & Grow: Build global brand; Increase awareness of job
opportunities; Highlight successes.
- Increase Investment: Maximize industry partnerships; Capitalize on private
capital; Target social impact investments.
- Emphasize Pathways & Partnerships: Create education-to-workforce
partnerships; Connect pathways to education and employment; Identify alternative
pathways to education and employment.
- Strengthen Foundation & Remove Barriers: Create a baseline; Reduce
business barriers (review City regulations and zoning); Inventory R&D opportunities;
Ensure lab and office space is available.
The Tech Lake City initiative intends to place a primary emphasis on this industry. Most of this is done
through partnerships and convening. The most strategic consideration for the City as it pertains to
potential Council action will be the “strengthen foundation” category. The council has already heard the
proposed zoning changes as an early example.
2. Has the Administration developed a strategy for the timing of new City tasks associated with the
Recommendations? The blueprint is not meant to be a document which outlines the details of tasks, but
rather serves as a collection of multidisciplinary feedback for what considerations are for partners, the
industry, and the city to serve the industry as well as to provide inclusive economic opportunity for
residents. One consideration that currently does have a timeline associated is the proposed zoning
amendments for tech uses.
3. Funding:
a. What City funding and other City resources may be needed in the future to
implement the Blueprint? While this document is not meant to approve future
requests, additional funding or policy considerations may be requested for the
following:
●Ongoing support for the BioHive may be a consideration the
administration might recommend to the Council
●Staff time to coordinate initiatives and convene partners around
recommended priorities in the document
●Support for BioUtah may be a consideration the administration might
recommend to the Council
●Staff time to conceptualize supporting lab and office space development
to support this industry may result in considerations to come before the
Council
b. Which other entities are expected to contribute funding or other support for the
actions recommended for the City in the Blueprint? Which have committed to helping
fund and support City actions? Those partners mentioned on page 13 have been
highly engaged with their time on this project and may be sources of funding in the
future. No expectations have been set in this document for funding commitments.
c. Will the request for any new resources come to the Council in the context of the
annual budget, or at some other time? Items referenced in part “a” are considerations
that may be presented to the Council from the administration depending on
prioritization of future budget recommendations from the Mayor’s Office.
4. Please provide more information and documentation about this item listed in the transmittal:
“BioHive has raised more than $1,100,000 in public and private investment.”
a. How many other public and private entities have contributed? State legislature
through GoUtah, University of Utah, EDC Utah, World Trade Center Utah, private
companies and from within the industry, and other organizations that support the
industry.
b. What kinds of investments have been made, or could be made, with the funds raised
by BioHive? BioHive is the story telling arm for health care innovation in Utah
focused on branding and marketing the industry. They are working with the city and
other stakeholders to support apprenticeships and workforce development programs
with the city and other groups across the state. They write articles, podcasts, and run
social media accounts, provide marketing collateral, hold events, and are leading
diversity and inclusion initiatives through their parity pledge focused on women and
people of color.
c. Are BioHive investments limited to activities in Salt Lake City? The BioHive is a
statewide effort to brand and message industry success and economic opportunity
across the state in Healthcare Innovation, however the density and hub of activity
within this industry is centered in Salt Lake City. Our partnership with the Biohive
ensures their investments and activities are taking place in Salt Lake City.
5. Salt Lake City’s (and Utah’s) economic successes in recent years are due in part to the successful
diversification of its economy relative to many other cities.
a. What are the potential risks and costs of the City government picking a single
industry to focus on? It is this administration’s priority to attract the innovative jobs
of the future and those technologies with the most potential are in healthcare
innovation. Health care Innovation is a broader term for biotech, medtech, life
sciences and digital health to be more inclusive of supporting industries. In practice,
an economy with only one industry is exposed to greater economic risk as its success
is correlated with industry success, rather than broader economic success; however,
Utah is the most diverse economy in the United States with a 2019 Hatchman Index
of 97.3 - meaning that the state is correlated with the wider economy of the United
States to a very large extent. Within the State, Salt Lake County has the highest
Hatchman Index rating of 94, so these risks are very minimal and in fact add value to
our efforts as there is diversity within the industry focus as a result of our existing
diverse economy. Within this industry Utah is just 1 of 4 states with industry
concentrations in multiple health care innovation sectors, including pharmaceuticals,
medical devices and research, testing, and medical laboratories. In short, this
industry is one of the most diverse in and of itself which is noteworthy. (Source: The
Bioscience Economy: Propelling life-saving treatments, supporting state & local
communities 2020; Teconomy Partners, LLC; Biotechnology Innovation
Organization; Public Affairs Consultants: 2020)
b. Did the administration evaluate options for similar efforts in other industries? Yes.
Healthcare Innovation was prioritized given that SLC is uniquely positioned in the
state, but also the nation. Salt Lake is 2nd in the nation for medical device
employment concentration, 2nd in the nation for annual growth in life sciences and
has the nation’s highest concentration of life sciences jobs. 7.2% growth in life
sciences jobs in 2020 compared to 0.5% in life science job growth nationally, ranking
Utah #2 in the nation. Life Science job concentration reached 1.9%- highest in the
nation more than double the national average of 0.9%. For the period 2012-2020,
Utah life sciences employment grew at an annual rate of 4.8% ranking Utah #2 in the
nation, only .06% less than Arizona.
6. The Blueprint suggests that health care innovation is already thriving in Salt Lake City, and in Utah.
Why, then, does it need City taxpayers to support its growth? This exercise was meant to bring together
partners to understand how to enable the industry, and also how to harness its growth for the benefits of
SLC residents through inclusive economic opportunity and improved health and well-being for all
residents. This industry has not received the attention like others in our state which provides an
opportunity to harness the growth, high wages, multiple entry points to start a career, upskill capabilities,
and the overall trajectory. As we create pathway programs, apprenticeships, mentorships, and better
connectivity with K-12 and higher education we can convene the companies within this industry to
provide entry points that will empower communities within the city to utilize these components to better
their lives and provide better opportunities for upward mobility.
7. Utah’s health care innovation jobs are said to be focused on research, testing, and medical
laboratories. What are the associated costs for cities that have large or increasing concentrations of these
kinds of industries? The questions below were outside of the scope of this exercise. They can be further
explored if desired by the Council.
a. For example, does the need for hazardous waste disposal services increase?
b. What about water use and testing for toxins released into the water and air?
8. How will potential benefits from investments paid for by Salt Lake City taxpayers, like access to new
jobs in health care innovation, be targeted to City residents, rather than people who live in the
surrounding metropolitan areas? Choosing a fast growing, high wage, economically stable, and
entrepreneurial & capital centered industry as well as an industry with multiple entry points for career
opportunities makes sense and since the concentration of these jobs and careers are here in the city has
the opportunity to take a lead role in coordinating stakeholders.
9. One of the public benefits associated with this initiative is providing more internship possibilities for
high school and college students.
a. How would the City ensure that these opportunities reach residents who
traditionally have inequitable access to these? This exercise has already brought
together partners at the school district and companies in healthcare innovation. The
City seeks to advance this work through aligning those partners with STEM pathways
and classroom engagement opportunities. One lever could be to place requirements
on any considerations regarding ongoing funding for the BioHive. Our outreach is
focused on the community groups who interact and provide services to the
underserved communities and is aligned with the Biohive and other partners in
education, industry, and other organizations in the community.
b. Would the opportunities be reserved for specific community members, for example,
people of color? This effort acknowledges and emphasizes that economic
opportunities in SLC aren’t equally available despite our economic strengths as the
capital city. Those decisions will be made by the companies, though the Council may
consider DEI requirements and engagement with diverse community organizations
for future BioHive funding considerations.
10. The Opportunity Index appears to be available for Salt Lake County, but not Salt Lake City. This is an
identified need in the City that DED has been working with IMS on.
a. Would a similar database be developed for the City to track the potential impacts of
the Health Care Innovation Blueprint? This is a goal that the department would
welcome and could work with IMS on. This would require staff time in IMS and/or
additional funding.
b. If so, which entity or City department would be charged with developing and
updating this information over time? This would require additional scoping of a
project to address the question in section a. There would likely be several options to
consider.
c. Is City-level data reliably available for all the indicators in the Opportunity Index?
DED does not yet know the answer to this question; however, this is an identified gap
in using the index for the City’s equity measure. In addition, the index does not
include information about racial diversity. The index does offer the interventions in
detail, however. We have explored elements of this important data and have received
positive feedback that the City could develop and request access to city level data sets
through our own sources or in partnership with other organizations.
11. Which organizations that were not involved in the creation of the Blueprint were asked by the City to
provide feedback on it? What were the most common questions and concerns of these organizations
Those listed in the document were the audience brought in for the recommendations contained in the
blueprint.
12. The Blueprint states that early childhood development and workforce interventions can be integrated
with the City’s approach to focusing economic development in the health care innovation industry. Could
you elaborate on the potential relationship between early childhood development and the health care
innovation industry?
Much research shows that the earlier children are exposed to STEM, the greater the probability they will
pursue STEM education and STEM careers. These Healthcare Innovation industries have the unique
opportunity to engage with young children and “spark an interest” in STEM opportunities. Salt Lake City
School District is currently highly engaged in a “STEM Ecosystem” development process, which will
include meaningful pathways into STEM education, capturing that “sparked interest and leading to career
exposure, all with the hope in mind young people will train and be retained within Utah companies. DED
has been engaged with both the school district and the companies about their pathway development.
Advancements within the life science industry impact the lives and well-being of our community. The
health care innovation ecosystem (life sciences + digital health) is critical to improving individual and
public health outcomes, in addition to quality of life through technology and innovation. A higher
concentration of digital health, life science, and healthcare professionals lead to a more health conscious,
higher educated, and economically resilient community.
13. Could you elaborate on the meaning and relevance of the following Opportunities and Challenges
listed in the chart on page 12 of the Blueprint? These items were identified as opportunities and
challenges by the multidisciplinary task force convened for this effort. These are high level observations
by the group.
a. Competency vs. credential gap for available workers
b. Established Research Park in SLC
c. Interconnected transportation systems
d. Limited resources (e.g. land, real estate, water, broadband, lab space)
e. Lack of "center" for health care innovation
f. No philanthropic focus for health care innovation
g. Lack of CRA/city coordination
A Blueprint for Salt Lake City’s
Health Care Innovation Economy
Vision
Salt Lake City will be a premier health care
innovation hub that provides expanded
economic opportunity and improved health
and well-being for all residents.
Utah’s Economic Heart
-Large and diverse economy
-Nearly 300,000 jobs located in Salt Lake City
-Approximately 40% of Salt Lake County’s jobs
-Approximately 20% of Utah’s jobs
Health Care Innovation (noun)
An industry that includes companies from the life sciences,
med tech, pharmaceuticals, health tech, and device
manufacturing. It does not include doctor-patient care.
Health Care Innovation
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of Utah Dept. of Workforce Services data
Health Care Innovation
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Life Sciences Workforce Specialization, 2020
Health Care Innovation
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis
of data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Advisory Group
Jared Bauer
CEO, IONIQ Sciences
David Bearss
Senior Managing Director,
Therapeutic Labs
Silvia Castro
Director, Suazo Business Center
Ginger Chinn
VP of Public Policy, Salt Lake
Chamber
Colby Cooley
VP of Business Development,
EDCUtah
Kelvyn Cullimore
CEO, BioUtah
Daniel Dugan
Council member, Salt Lake City
Victor Garcia
Global VP, Varex Imaging
Miles Hansen
President and CEO, World
Trade Center Utah
Chandana Haque
Executive Director, Altitude
Lab & Recursion
Anh Hoang
Chief Science Officer, Co-Founder
Sofregen Medical Inc.
Sara Jones
CEO and Founder, Inclusion Pro
Ben Kolendar
Economic Development Director,
Salt Lake City
John Librett
CEO, Survivor Wellness
Keith Marmer
Chief Innovation & Economic
Engagement Officer,
University of Utah
Jacob Maxwell
Workforce Development
Manager, Salt Lake City
Heidi Hall
Senior Advisor and Project
Consultant, Intermountain
Healthcare
Katelin Roberts
Executive Director, BioHive
Scott Romney
Manager Talent Ready Utah,
GoUtah
Melisa Stark
Commissioner of Apprenticeship
Program, Department of
Workforce Services
Blake Thomas
Director, SLC Community &
Neighborhoods Department
Danny Walz
Director, SLC Redevelopment
Agency
Timeline
Opportunities & Challenges
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Recommendations
Brand, Promote,
& Grow
Increase
Investment
Emphasize Pathways
& Partnerships
Strengthen Foundation
& Remove Barriers
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Brand, Promote and Grow
•Build Global Brand
•Increase Awareness of Job Opportunities
•Highlight Successes
•Maximize Industry Partnerships
•Capitalize on Private Capital
•Target Social Impact Investments
Increase Investment
•Create Education-to -Workforce Partnerships
•Connect Pathways
•Identify Alternative Pathways
Emphasize Pathways & Partnerships
•Create a Baseline
•Reduce Business Barriers
•Inventory R&D Opportunities
•Ensure Space is Available
Strengthen and Foundation
and Remove Barriers
A Blueprint for Health Care Innovation
Salt Lake City will be a premier health care
innovation hub that provides expanded
economic opportunity and improved health
and well-being for all residents.
A Blueprint for Growing Salt Lake City’s
Health Care Innovation Economy
November 2021
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURINGii
VISION
Salt Lake City will be a premier health care innovation
hub that provides expanded economic opportunity and
improved health and well-being for all residents.
Table of Contents
Letter from Mayor Mendenhall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
Recommendations in Brief . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Brand, Promote, & Grow ............................4
Increase Investment ................................5
Emphasize Pathways & Partnerships ................6
Strengthen Foundation & Remove Barriers ..........7
Utah Health Care innovation industry . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
Measurements for Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
Opportunities and Challenges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
Health Care innovation Advisory Group . . . . . . . . . .13
Advisory Group and Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
November 2021
Dear Friends,
Salt Lake City enjoys a well-rounded and growing economy that offers most residents and businesses plentiful
opportunities for success and prosperity.
Some residents, though, lack access to the educational and employment opportunities that many take for
granted. This leaves individuals and families behind, economically and socially, and creates an imbalance in our
community’s overall wealth and well-being that affects us all.
We’re working to change that. Everyone in Salt Lake City deserves a chance to learn, earn, and be part of a
thriving community.
That’s why my administration, through our Tech Lake City initiative, is invigorating our focus on inclusive growth
that empowers upward mobility for both residents and businesses. Our focus for this human-centered approach
is the health care sector, an area in which Salt Lake City already boasts a flourishing foundation of institutions and
businesses. With the highest concentration of life science-related jobs in the state located in the Capital City, we
have a tremendous opportunity to become a world-class hub for health care innovation.
This blueprint includes our vision, mission, guiding principles, action steps, and recommendations, to guide the
daily and long-term direction of Salt Lake City’s economic and social development efforts. It reflects our desire to
identify and strengthen community assets to ensure the City’s foundation supports structures that are fair,
equitable, inclusive, and diverse.
Much effort and many ideas have gone into building this plan, including the work of a multidisciplinary Health
Care Innovation Advisory Group convened for this purpose, along with work by City staff, the Gardner Institute,
and many other individuals and groups. It will be a management tool to guide our common vision, to unite people
and organizations, and to shape our City’s unique assets to build upward mobility of both businesses and people
to solve global challenges.
Not only will this approach improve the health of people locally and around the world, it will extend the capacity
to succeed to those who haven’t had the opportunity to do so.
Success will require collaboration and long-term effort by the private and public sectors. By working together,
we will reach our goal of raising Salt Lake City’s prominence as a worldwide hub for health care innovation, we will
build a more diverse, inclusive, and fair community.
We have an amazing opportunity in front of us, and we have momentum on our side. Let’s take up the challenge
to combine innovation with compassion to establish a thriving, inclusive, and equitable place called Salt Lake City.
Warmly,
Mayor Erin Mendenhall
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING2
Utah’s economic heart . Salt Lake City is well-established as the economic hub of the
Wasatch Front, Utah as a whole, and the Intermountain West region. With nearly 300,000
jobs – 40% of all jobs in Salt Lake County; and nearly 20% of Utah’s total jobs – Salt Lake
City’s economy is large and diverse, although inextricably linked to the local and regional
economies.
Opportunities aren’t equally available . Despite its strengths and resiliency, not all residents
share in Salt Lake City’s economic success because of lack of opportunity, or more
specifically, lack of access to opportunity. Indeed, the Opportunity Index score for Salt Lake
County is a below-par C+. The Opportunity Index measures not just a community’s
economic health, but how available economic opportunities are to all residents, and how
well a community provides the social support needed to increase economic mobility.
Recognizing that 36 percent of the City's residents are members of ethnic and racial
minority groups, one of the four main objectives of Mayor Mendenhall’s SLC 2021 Plan –
“Creating inclusive and equitable opportunity for all” – aims to address this need head-on.
Unique initiative considers social values and needs . Mayor Mendenhall has challenged
the City’s economic development team to create a strategy that addresses residents’
social, as well as economic, needs; reaches all communities; and considers the City’s
human capital, and not just its physical, financial, and intellectual forms of capital.
Focusing on health care innovation will broaden opportunity . With life sciences already a
pillar of the economy, Salt Lake City chooses to leverage it with the strengths in research
and development, manufacturing, financial services, entrepreneurship to emphasize the
region's leadership in healthcare innovation. Careers in health care innovation offer higher
than average wages, are "sticky" and not easily transferrable, are more recession-proof
compared to any other major industry in the state and provide a range of entry points at
different salary levels. This industry already has a diverse workforce, along with the ability to
scale apprenticeship and mentorship opportunities and connect to STEM education within
our school district. Our community colleges and universities offer a wide range of programs
from lab technician training, biomedical informatics, and genetic discovery, along with
programming that assists in re-skilling and up-skilling our community.
What is
Health Care
Innovation?
The health care innovation
industry is a disruptor industry
including companies from the
life sciences, med tech, and
health tech industries aimed at
innovating and improving the
health care ecosystem.
It does not include doctor-
patient care.
A People-focused Approach to
Economic Development
The premise for this blueprint is simple: Build on Salt Lake City's economic strengths in
health care innovation and provide expanded economic opportunity and improved health
and well-being for all residents. This is a people-focused approach to economic development.
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 3
Brand, Promote, & Grow
Growing and maintaining Salt Lake City's
reputation as one of the nation's top
locations for health care innovation is
instrumental to the city's success. We offer three
recommendations to help accomplish this:
1. Build global brand;
2. Increase awareness of job opportunities; and
3. Highlight successes.
increase investment
With the objective of increasing social and
income mobility through the health care
innovation industry, the city can help
inform and connect available public and private funding
to support innovation ecosystem in the City. We offer
three recommendations to help accomplish this:
1. Maximize industry partnerships;
2. Capitalize on private capital; and
3. Target social impact investments.
Emphasize Pathways &
Partnerships
Available, accessible, and affordable
education and training opportunities are
imperative to supply as workforce for Salt Lake City's fast-
growing health care innovation economy. We offer three
recommendations to help accomplish this:
1. Create education-to-workforce partnerships;
2. Connect pathways; and
3. Identify alternative pathways.
Strengthen Foundation &
Remove Barriers
Salt Lake City's health care innovation
ecosystem is only as strong as the foundation
that supports it. Streamlined regulations and up-to-date
information can help the industry flourish. We offer four
recommendations to help accomplish this:
1. Create a baseline;
2. Reduce business barriers;
3. Inventory R&D opportunities; and
4. Ensure lab and office space is available.
Recommendations in Brief
These four pillars create the foundation to building a strong and sustainable
health care innovation industry and providing hyper-localized opportunities
for all of Salt Lake City’s residents.
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING4
Growing and maintaining
Salt Lake City’s reputation
as one of the nation’s and
world’s top locations for
health care innovation is
instrumental to the City’s
success. Here are
recommendations to
help accomplish this:
Build Global Brand – Establish and sustain Salt Lake City’s unique
position and brand in the national health care innovation ecosystem and
participate in national and global organizations to glean best practices and
raise awareness about the City. Partner with BioHive, BioUtah, the University
of Utah, and others, to expand the City’s reach by sharing stories of our talent
base to attract interest, attend and sponsor events inside and outside the
state, and promote innovative efforts of local companies and initiatives.
increase Awareness of Job Opportunities – Create a powerful
grassroots messaging and outreach campaign focused on engaging and
educating underserved communities about opportunities in the health care
innovation sector. Partner with BioHive, BioUtah, local nonprofit organizations,
the Salt Lake City School District, and others, to educate about potential career
pathways, showcase successful role models, and raise awareness of easy-to-
access education and training options.
Highlight Successes – Demonstrate the City’s shift to people-focused
economic development efforts by promoting innovative and successful
ways the City and partner organizations are uplifting underserved
populations through the news media (local, national, and global), social
media, awards, and other channels. Continue to build and strengthen
relationships with public and private agencies in the health care innovation
sector and engage their support in coordinating a consistent program of
media relations.
Brand, Promote, & Grow
“Tech Lake City” is the overarching concept guiding Salt Lake City’s
current and future economic development efforts, the centerpiece of
which is the fast-growing health care innovation sector.
Mayor Mendenhall launched the Tech Lake City initiative in January
of 2020 to attract more innovation and tech talent to the City, and to
help improve pathways to tech education and employment for all City
residents, particularly those in underserved communities.
Tech Lake City represents a pivot to a more-proactive, non-traditional
approach to economic development focusing on strengthening key
sectors, starting with health care innovation.
A key example of this new approach is the City’s work to secure
investment to create BioHive, a public-private agency designed to
connect and promote the 1,100+ life sciences and health care
innovation companies in and around Salt Lake City. BioHive coordinates
with its statewide sibling, BioUtah, and interacts with related
innovation-focused efforts like the Salt Lake Chamber’s newly created
Wasatch Innovation Network.
The Tech Lake City initiative is managed by Clark Cahoon, technology
and innovation advisor in the Department of Economic Development,
and overseen by department director, Ben Kolendar.
Salt Lake City
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 5
With the objective of
increasing social and
income mobility through
the health care
innovation industry, the
City can help inform and
connect available public
and private funding to
support the innovation
ecosystem in the City.
Maximize industry Partnerships – To be successful, Salt Lake City’s
efforts require working closely with economic development agencies at the
state and local levels, as well as with health care innovation industry
organizations like BioUtah and BioHive, of which the City is a founder. By closely
analyzing the City’s specific needs, officials can identify and fill gaps, while
deepening important and symbiotic relationships.
Capitalize on Private Capital – Local, regional, and national banks, along
with Utah’s many industrial loan corporations (ILCs) and other financial
institutions, provide opportunities for tapping into Community Reinvestment
Act funds and other sources. Partnering with the Federal Reserve is one way to
convene and educate banks about the City’s people-focused approach and how
it offers new prospects for investing in meaningful and lasting community and
social impact. In addition, convening an ongoing advisory group of local, national,
and global funders with industry expertise can help Salt Lake City officials
understand funding structures and opportunities, brainstorm and strategize
funding approaches, and seek advice on economic development efforts.
Target Social impact investments – Salt Lake City is investigating
novel opportunities, such as directing public investment into community-based
programs to increase opportunity and economic mobility, particularly on the
City's west side, which historically has been redlined, marginalized, and
underserved. The two areas of focus are early childhood development and
workforce interventions, both of which can be integrated with the City’s approach
to focusing economic development in the health care innovation industry.
Increase Investment
Chandana Haque
Selected as one of 30 Women
to Watch in 2021 by Utah
Business magazine, Chandana
is Executive Director of
Altitude Lab, Utah’s largest
incubator for growing
early-stage life science and
health care companies.
A collaboration launched in 2020 by biotech firm
Recursion and the University of Utah’s PIVOT Center,
Altitude Lab fills the critical role of lowering hurdles
for underrepresented entrepreneurs. The
organization’s aim is to foster socially responsible
entrepreneurship, job creation, and economic
productivity.
I’m proud that 80 percent of startups at Altitude Lab are led
by women and minorities. Their diversity enables them to
innovate and address the disparities they have experienced
first-hand. Providing founders with a network of top-tier, national
investors, something that is difficult for underrepresented
founders to access, can completely change the trajectory of their
startup, propelling them to not only compete but excel in our
fast-changing health care innovation landscape.
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING6
Available, accessible, and
affordable education and
training opportunities are
imperative to supply a
sustainable workforce for
Salt Lake City’s fast-
growing health care
innovation economy.
Tapping into existing
programs, and filling in
gaps to meet specific
needs, is fundamental to
the City’s success.
Create Education-to-Workforce Partnerships – Partner
with the Salt Lake City School District, STEM Action Center, BioHive,
BioUtah, and others, to help better meet the community’s education-to-
workforce needs. Involve higher education and industry partners to define,
refine, and customize, training and education efforts. Seek one or more
industry firms to join the effort as partners for mentoring and internship/
apprenticeship opportunities.
Connect Pathways – Partner with Talent Ready Pathways program to
create localized opportunities for students to engage in the health care
innovation industry. Create city-specific metrics to help guide the success
of the program within Salt Lake City.
identify Alternative Pathways – Survey industry businesses to
identify positions that typically require higher education or certification
that could be reassessed to include alternative pathways such as
apprenticeship, internships, skills tests, etc. Use survey results to create a
strategic plan on how to inform and motivate businesses to create more
alternative pathway opportunities for employees.
Emphasize Pathways & Partnerships
Keith Marmer
A holder of three patents and
founder of four companies,
Keith has helped raise more
than $1 billion in investment
capital for multiple startups
and overseen the creation of
more than 140 companies
during the last 30 years.
Now, as Chief Innovation & Economic Engagement
Officer for the University of Utah (the U), Keith
oversees the school’s globally-recognized PIVOT
Center. On behalf of the U, PIVOT Center serves as a
catalyst for the regional innovation economy,
integrating technology commercialization, corporate
engagement, and economic development.
Health care innovation is an area of existing strength for Salt
Lake City and Utah and the city and state are positioned well to
continue to make global impact. It’s a field that thrives and relies on a
constant supply of new ideas and approaches; the PIVOT Center sits
at that critical junction where laboratory innovations become
marketable, life-saving products and treatments. Moving the
economic needle – particularly to benefit those innovations with less
access to opportunity – will require ever-stronger partnerships
between education, industry, and government, something I’m
excited to see in this effort led by Mayor Mendenhall.
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 7
Salt Lake City’s health
care innovation
ecosystem is only as
strong as the foundation
that supports it.
Streamlined regulations
and up-to-date
information can help
the industry and
businesses flourish.
Create a Baseline – Collect citywide data on workforce development
needs, job growth, and wage growth within the health care innovation
industry to provide a baseline measurement and the ability to set thoughtful
and strategic goals. Identify and track a handful of key metrics to understand
how well the City’s economic development and social mobility objectives are
being met over time.
Reduce Business Barriers – Identify ways that city regulations and
zoning laws may be impeding the success of building a thriving health care
innovation ecosystem; then, identify and implement ways to resolve concerns.
inventory R&D Opportunities – Work with partners, identify current
and planned research and development activities by colleges and universities,
health care providers, nonprofit organizations, and private companies.
Compile and analyze existing inventories to identify gaps and potential
opportunities, such as promising but unrealized patents, then determine
how best to move forward with a short list of encouraging possibilities.
Ensure Space is Available – Create a streamlined and collaborative
real estate plan to promote health care innovation industry incubator
development, wet lab spaces, and industry-friendly commercial land
development, prioritize real estate opportunities to support the innova tion
ecosystem. Focus on the Innovation Corridor already underway, options for the
development of city assets, and aligning plans with University of Utah, Research
Park, and real estate development leaders.
Strengthen Foundation & Remove Barriers
Anh Hoang, PhD
A native of Salt Lake City’s Glendale
neighborhood, Anh has built a
successful career as a life sciences
entrepreneur with a doctorate in
biomedical engineering, thanks in
part to a college scholarship
from her father’s employer,
O.C. Tanner Company.
Anh co-founded Sofregen Medical Inc. in the Boston
area and serves as the firm’s Chief Science Officer. Under
her guidance, Sofregen developed the first product made
from reconstituted silk protein to be cleared by the FDA
for a medical use. Anh is also a faculty member at
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Catalyst
LinQ program and was a recipient of the 2018 Medtech
Boston 40 under 40 Healthcare Innovators.
My success can be anyone’s success if they have access to
education, training, and most importantly, mentors and role
models. That can be especially difficult for people living in
underserved communities like the one I grew up in. We need a
more direct approach to engage young people and demonstrate
the world of opportunities that await them. That’s why I’m excited
about Salt Lake City’s health care innovation initiative and am
eager to return to Utah to help make it a reality.
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING8
Cementing Salt Lake City’s role as a worldwide
health care innovator and leader rests on Utah’s
historic and current success. The fact is that many
innovative and economically strong health care
elements already support our community. Amplifying
this advantage will strengthen and broaden our
economic foundation of larger anchor firms, as well
as innovative spin-offs, that create new ways of
helping the world and offer opportunities for well-
paying and satisfying jobs for Salt Lake City residents.
Being more successful requires the City and its
partners to effectively tell the story of our health
care innovation economy, within Utah and across
the nation and globe. BioUtah's recently established
industry association, BioHive, is working to fill this
need with support from the City and public and
private partners.
Our legacy of health care innovation and new
partnerships like BioHive allow us to seize the
moment and proactively shape the way our City
grows – with a clear focus on equity, social and
human capital, and a desire to reach our full potential
within an industry that improves and extends the
health and well-being of not only our residents, but
people everywhere.
Home-Grown Health Care Innovations
n Salt Lake City was the home of the first artificial heart
successfully implanted in a human. Retired dentist
Barney Clark lived 112 days with the device in his chest,
an advancement that attracted worldwide media
attention to University Hospital.
n The first hospital information system to integrate
patient data for clinical decision support – Health
Evaluation through Logical Programming, or HELP –
was developed here and led the way to worldwide
adoption of electronic medical records.
n The University of Utah is home to the Utah Population
Database, the nation’s only and world’s largest
repository for genetics, epidemiology, demography,
and public health data.
n We also have steady grant funding from the National
Institutes of Health, a top five technology transfer
ranking, as well as an overall employment growth rate
of 26% from 2012 to 2016.
n Founded in 1984 by University of Utah pathologists,
ARUP Laboratories has grown into a national nonprofit
and academic reference laboratory at the forefront of
diagnostic medicine. With more than 4,000 employees,
ARUP offers 3,000+ tests and test combinations and
processes over 50,000 specimens every day, 24/7.
Utah's Health Care Innovation Industry
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute; BioHive
More Than 1,100
companies are part of the ecosystem.
Life sciences
produce 8% of
Utah’s total GDP.
Utah is 6th per capita
in life sciences investment in the U.S.
Salt Lake area is
2nd in the nation
for medical device
employment concentration.
Economic Proof Points
Utah is 2nd in the nation
for annual growth
in life sciences employment growth
between 2012 and 2020.
Nation's highest
concentration of life sciences jobs – twice the national average.
Utah is 1 of just 4 states
with industry concentrations in multiple
health care innovation sectors, including
pharmaceuticals, medical devices and research,
testing, and medical laboratories.
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 9
Utah Life Sciences: Comparisons with Other Leading States
In 2020, Utah’s life sciences job growth reached an exceptional
7.2% amid nationwide employment gains in the industry
averaging 0.5%. Utah’s growth ranked second among the 20
largest state life sciences industries, eight of which contracted
since 2019.
Since 2007, even through business cycle fluctuations, growth
in the life sciences industry has outpaced the rest of Utah’s
economy. For example, life sciences employment gains were
robust in 2020 when the state experienced an overall 1.8%
contraction in average employment.
In 2020, Utah’s workforce concentration in life sciences
reached 1.9% of all employees, first among states and more
than double the national average of 0.9%. Utah had the 15th
most life sciences jobs of any state, which was high for the 31st
largest employed workforce in the U.S.
Within the life sciences industry, Utah compares favorably
among states in terms of workforce specialization in devices
(second), pharmaceuticals (fourth), research and laboratories
(eighth), and distribution (16th).
Figure 2 . Life Sciences Workforce Specialization,
2015 and 2020
(Life Sciences Share of Total Employment in the Top 20 States)
Note: Employment shares represent all employees at life sciences companies, regardless
of occupation. Top 20 states selected by their 2020 life sciences employment level.
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
GA
TXWA
OH
NY
MI
FLTN
AZ
PA
CO
WI
CANC
MA
NJ
IN
MN
UT
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
1.8%
2.0%
0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000Life Sciences Employment as a Percent of Total EmploymentLife Sciences Employment
U.S. median = 0.6%
U.S. average = 0.9%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.7%
0.7%
0.8%
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
1.0%
1.2%
1.2%
1.4%
1.5%
1.7%
1.7%
1.9%
0.9%
0.5%
0.5%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.7%
0.8%
0.7%
0.7%
0.8%
0.9%
0.8%
0.7%
1.1%
1.1%
1.3%
1.4%
1.5%
1.4%
1.6%
0.8%
0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%
Georgia
Texas
Washington
Ohio
New York
Michigan
Florida
Tennessee
Arizona
Illinois
Pennsylvania
Colorado
Wisconsin
California
North Carolina
Massachusetts
New Jersey
Indiana
Minnesota
Utah
U.S.
2015 2020
IL
166.6
121.6
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020Life Sciences Industry Other Industries
Single-Year, 2019–2020
Figure 1 . Life Sciences industry Annual Job Growth
Percentage Change for States with the 20 Largest Life Sciences
Industries
Note: Top 20 states selected by their 2020 life sciences employment level. Alaska and
Hawaii, not shown, were not among the states providing the most life sciences jobs.
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
0.3%
-0.2%
3.6%
1.1%-1.4%
-1.3%
2.0%
-2.8%
1.9%
3.2%
0.6%
-2.2%
-0.6%
-4.0%
1.8%
4.4%
7.1%
7.2%10.2%
-1.3%
-4.0% to 0.0%0.0% to 1.9%2.0% to 3.9%4.0% to 10.2%Not top 20
5.5%
7.0%
4.1%4.8%
6.1%
2.6%
2.1%
3.4%
2.5%
0.8%
1.8%
1.9%1.4%
3.6%
1.3%
0.9%
2.7%
3.8%2.1%
1.3%
Five-Year Average, 2015–2020
0.3%
-0.2%
3.6%
1.1%-1.4%
-1.3%
2.0%
-2.8%
1.9%
3.2%
0.6%
-2.2%
-0.6%
-4.0%
1.8%
4.4%
7.1%
7.2%10.2%
-1.3%
-4.0% to 0.0%0.0% to 1.9%2.0% to 3.9%4.0% to 10.2%Not top 20
5.5%
7.0%
4.1%4.8%
6.1%
2.6%
2.1%
3.4%
2.5%
0.8%
1.8%
1.9%1.4%
3.6%
1.3%
0.9%
2.7%
3.8%2.1%
1.3%
0.3%
-0.2%
3.6%
1.1%-1.4%
-1.3%
2.0%
-2.8%
1.9%
3.2%
0.6%
-2.2%
-0.6%
-4.0%
1.8%
4.4%
7.1%
7.2%10.2%
-1.3%
-4.0% to 0.0%0.0% to 1.9%2.0% to 3.9%4.0% to 10.2%Not top 20
5.5%
7.0%
4.1%4.8%
6.1%
2.6%
2.1%
3.4%
2.5%
0.8%
1.8%
1.9%1.4%
3.6%
1.3%
0.9%
2.7%
3.8%2.1%
1.3%
0.3%
-0.2%
3.6%
1.1%-1.4%
-1.3%
2.0%
-2.8%
1.9%
3.2%
0.6%
-2.2%
-0.6%
-4.0%
1.8%
4.4%
7.1%
7.2%10.2%
-1.3%
-4.0% to 0.0%0.0% to 1.9%2.0% to 3.9%4.0% to 10.2%Not top 20
5.5%
7.0%
4.1%4.8%
6.1%
2.6%
2.1%
3.4%
2.5%
0.8%
1.8%
1.9%1.4%
3.6%
1.3%
0.9%
2.7%
3.8%2.1%
1.3%
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING10
Salt Lake City Employment
Salt Lake City hosts more than 294,000 jobs, or about 19 percent of all jobs in
Utah, and 40 percent of all jobs in Salt Lake County. As Figure 1 shows, Utah
specializes in research, testing, and medical laboratories – a noted strength of
Salt Lake City, which is home to 46% of Utah’s professional, scientific, and
technical services employment. Salt Lake City is not just a premier employment
center for the state, it is a growth center for life sciences jobs.
While these industries include jobs outside of life sciences or health care, they
are indicators of the general state of jobs in the health care innovation sector
with companies in the life sciences manufacturing and research and
development industries.
Salt Lake City also employs a labor pool made up of non-resident commuters.
Of Salt Lake City’s residents, 43.2 percent of the working residents live and work
in the City while 56.8 percent of citizens commute outside of Salt Lake for work.
Of those employed in Salt Lake City, 83.1 percent live outside the area.
Salt Lake City Resident Commuting Patterns
43.2
56.8
SLC Resident and
Employed in SLC
SLC Resident
Commuting Outside
16.9
83.1
SLC Resident
Employees
Non-SLC Resident
Employees
43.2
56.8
SLC Resident and
Employed in SLC
SLC Resident
Commuting Outside
16.9
83.1
SLC Resident
Employees
Non-SLC Resident
Employees
Salt Lake City Employment Commuting Patterns
43.2
56.8
SLC Resident and
Employed in SLC
SLC Resident
Commuting Outside
16.9
83.1
SLC Resident
Employees
Non-SLC Resident
Employees
43.2
56.8
SLC Resident and
Employed in SLC
SLC Resident
Commuting Outside
16.9
83.1
SLC Resident
Employees
Non-SLC Resident
Employees
Table 2: Employment by industry, 2019
Employment Financial Services Life Sciences iT/Software
Salt Lake County 736,746 57,538 28,848 44,930
State of Utah 1,559,843 86,784 43,584 86,602
County Share of Industry Employment 47%66%66%52%
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Insititute analysis of Utah Department of Workforce Services data
Table 1: industries in Health Care innovation Employment, 2019
industry Salt Lake City
Salt Lake
County
Utah
County State of Utah
Share of industry in
Salt Lake County
Share of industry
in Utah
Manufacturing 25,895 57,834 19,679 136,893 44.8%18.9%
Professional/Scientific/Technical Services 50,506 60,548 21,946 109,824 83.4%46.0%
Health Care and Social Assistance 23,796 81,706 32,005 179,929 29.1%13.2%
Subtotal 100,197 200,088 73,630 426,646 50.1%23.5%
Total Employment 294,156 736,746 266,837 1,559,843 39.9%18.9%
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Insititute analysis of Utah Department of Workforce Services data
70.4%
22.6%
24.6%
81.3%
18.0%
58.2%
55.2%
15.2%
11.6%
19.1%
20.2%
3.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Life Sciences Distribution
Drugs and Pharmaceuticals
Medical Devices and Equipment
Research, Testing, and Medical Laboratories
Utah Other States Other Countries
Figure 1: Utah Life Sciences industry Components, Share of Output Sold by Destination, 2017
Source: Utah Department of Workforce Services, Bureau of Economic Analysis, REMI PI+ economic model, and Biotechnology Innovation Organization.
Source: US. Census Bureau
The City's Blueprint incorporates economic metrics to pair
with broader City initiatives to create more opportunity for
residents. In this way, the Blueprint serves as both a community
and economic development tool.
The Blueprint's long-term goals on social mobility require
metrics beyond the traditional economic development
measurements.
Tracking the City’s Opportunity index Score
Traditional economic development metrics track growth
indicators like the growth of the city’s tax base, job growth,
wage growth, private investment, and the amount of real estate
dedicated to life sciences. These metrics provide an
understanding of how much growth is happening, where, and
why it may be happening. By creating a baseline of these more
traditional economic development, or placemaking, metrics,
the City is able to track the progress and efficacy of the Blueprint
and make course corrections as necessary.
The City also intends to implement a version of the Opportunity
Index as a measure of how well economic growth is distributed
among City residents. This Index includes metrics housed in
four areas of community well-being:
• Economy
• Education
• Health
• Community
These metrics include data on employment, wages, income
inequality, housing, educational attainment, and insurance
coverage, among others.
Considering the Benefits of Social Capital
Access to economic opportunity for individuals varies across
geographies. Nationally, rates of income mobility have steadily
fallen since 1940. This is primarily due to decreasing economic
growth and an increasingly unequal distribution of growth.
Increasing economic growth is not enough to increase rates of
income mobility, the growth must occur across the income
distribution.1, 2 Areas with high income mobility share five basic
characteristics, including less residential segregation, less
income inequality, better primary schools, greater social capital,
and greater family stability.3
Of these characteristics, social capital is one of the most
important connections between economic development and
increasing opportunity for all. Social capital refers to the
existence of mutual support and cooperation, networks of
trust, institutional effectiveness, goodwill and civic virtue.4, 5
Community development efforts, like the City’s blueprint,
encompass these characteristics into a structure for positive
and purposeful collective action.6 It builds a community’s
capacity to improve the well-being of its residents based on
existing human, social, and economic assets.7 It also recognizes
that some factors affecting well-being are nonlocal factors, and
provides a realistic appraisal of opportunities and constraints.8
1. Chetty, R., et al. (2017). The Fading American Dream: Trends in Absolute Mobility. Science 356(6336): 398-406. Retrieved from https://opportunityinsights.org/paper/the-fading-
american-dream/
2. Wilkinson, K. (1991). The Community in Rural America. New York: Greenwood Press.
3. Chetty, R. et al. (2014). Where is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics 129(4): 1553-1623, 2014.
Retrieved from https://opportunityinsights.org/paper/land-of-opportunity/
4. U.S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee. (2018). Social Capital Project: “The Geography of Social Capital in America.” Retrieved from https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/
republicans/2018/4/the-geography-of-social-capital-in-america
5. Wilkinson, K. (1991). The Community in Rural America. New York: Greenwood Press.
6. Wilkinson, K. (1991). The Community in Rural America. New York: Greenwood Press.
7. Flora, C.B. and Luther, V. (2000). An Introduction to Building Community Capacity. Small Tow and Rural Economic Development: A Case Studies Approach. Connecticut: Praeger
Publishers.
8. Wilkinson, K. (1991). The Community in Rural America. New York: Greenwood Press.
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 11
Measurements for Growth
The Blueprint's long-term goals on social mobility requires metrics beyond the traditional
economic development measurements.
Opportunity index
The Opportunity Index was jointly developed by
Opportunity Nation and Measure of America and measures
16 indicators, scoring all 50 states plus Washington DC on a
scale of 0-100 each year. In addition, more than 2,600
counties are graded A-F, giving policymakers and leaders a
useful tool to identify areas for improvement and to gauge
progress over time.
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING12
A crucial part of developing this blueprint was to identify
opportunities and challenges facing Salt Lake City and the
health care innovation industry. Members of the Advisory
Group, stakeholders, and the project team, viewed this task
through the lens of the guiding principles, a set of foundational
concepts embedded throughout the process.
Opportunities and challenges were identified for four types
of “capital,” three of which – physical capital, intellectual capital,
and financial capital – are commonly assessed in economic
development planning. The fourth, human and social capital,
adds the perspective of the City’s current and future workforce
and residents, and their ability to succeed – a complex,
undervalued, and critical factor for creating this plan.
Once articulated, the opportunities and challenges were
analyzed and organized into four common thematic areas to
help define and shape Salt Lake City’s approach to people-
centered economic development. In turn, the thematic areas
provided structure to help organize the blueprint’s
recommendations, which are outlined on the following pages.
Physical Capital
Opportunities:
n Crossroads of the West
n Interconnected transportation
systems
n Utah's urban & cultural core
Challenges:
n Limited resources (e.g. land, real
estate, water, broadband, lab space)
n Lack of "center" for health care
innovation
Human & Social Capital
Opportunities:
n Growing # of STEM grads (but still need more)
n Strong social & economic mobility in SLC
n Strong sense of community
n Relatively low wages/COL compared nationally
n Growing support networks (BioHive, BioUtah, etc.)
Challenges:
n Lack of engaged diverse communities
n Lack of coordination between support networks
n Competency vs. credential gap for available workers
n Negative cultural & environmental concerns
Financial Capital
Opportunnities:
n Low tax rate
n Strong small business programs
n Strong philanthropic culture
n Strong banks & ILCs
Challenges:
n Low VC funding
n No philanthropic focus for health
care innovation
n Lack of CRA/city coordination
intellectual Capital
Opportunities:
n Research university with robust health
sciences in SLC
n Established Research Park in SLC
n Growing population of potential workers
Challenges:
n Lack of incubators & accelerators from
Research Park
n Lack of representation of diverse
communities in industry & government
Common Themes
That Define
Salt Lake City's Role
Frame & Brand
Convene & Connect
Inspire & Invest
Support & Sustain
FOUNDATiON—Elements integral to All Activities
n Inclusive, equitable growth
n Global perspective, interconnected region
n Leverage existing assets
n Focused attention, long-term horizon
n Public/private/community collaboration
n Time-constrained, data-driven, measurable
Opportunities and Challenges
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 13
Health Care Innovation Advisory Group
These advisory group members were selected to create a fabric across the city that will create an interconnected web within our
health care innovation community as we embark on filling gaps, building upon our strengths, and bring organizations together as
we tap into the capital city’s full potential.
Jared Bauer
CEO, IONIQ Sciences
David Bearss
Senior Managing Director, Therapeutic Labs
Silvia Castro
Director, Suazo Business Center
Ginger Chinn
VP of Public Policy, Salt Lake Chamber
Colby Cooley
VP of Business Development, EDCUtah
Kelvyn Cullimore
CEO, BioUtah
Daniel Dugan
Council member, Salt Lake City
Victor Garcia
Global VP, Varex Imaging
Miles Hansen
President and CEO, World Trade Center Utah
Chandana Haque
Executive Director, Altitude Lab & Recursion
Anh Hoang
Chief Science Officer, Co-Founder Sofregen Medical Inc.
Sara Jones
CEO and Founder, Inclusion Pro
Ben Kolendar
Economic Development Director, Salt Lake City
John Librett
CEO, Survivor Wellness
Keith Marmer
Chief Innovation & Economic Engagement Officer,
University of Utah
Jacob Maxwell
Workforce Development Manager, Salt Lake City
Heidi Hall
Senior Advisor and Project Consultant,
Intermountain Healthcare
Katelin Roberts
Executive Director, BioHive
Scott Romney
Manager Talent Ready Utah, GoUtah
Melisa Stark
Commissioner of Apprenticeship Program,
Department of Workforce Services
Blake Thomas
Director, SLC Community & Neighborhoods Department
Danny Walz
Director, SLC Redevelopment Agency
Supporting Staff:
Max Backlund, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Clark Cahoon, Salt Lake City Economic Development
Meredith King, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Siobhan Locke, The Langdon Group
Dianne Olson, The Langdon Group
Jennifer Robinson, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Paul Springer, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Brian Wilkinson, Wilkinson Ferrari & Co
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING14
The following principles guide the Gardner Institute and the
Governance Advisory Group in the discussion and
development of the Blueprint.
Leverage our unique assets to unite people and
organizations .
We acknowledge the significant role that health care research,
systems, design, and manufacturing play in Salt Lake City,
home to two-thirds of Utah’s jobs in this sector. We seek to
better connect organizations and people to increase
employment, raise average incomes, and improve the
community’s health and well-being. We will identify needs and
gaps to build on our advantages and ensure long-term
economic competitiveness.
Lasting economic prosperity requires focused attention
and willingness to forego short-term gains when needed .
We seek to unlock the full potential of our health care
innovation ecosystem to ensure opportunity and advance
prosperity for all residents of Salt Lake City. We will do this by
broadening traditional economic development approaches to
focus equally on equity, diversity, and inclusion of those who
are often overlooked. We also recognize that fundamental,
lasting economic improvements may require changes by
governments and the investment of public and private dollars
in different ways.
Our regional economy is an interconnected web .
We recognize that health care innovation and economic
development do not respect jurisdictional boundaries. While
our efforts are focused on Salt Lake City, the entire Wasatch
Front region will share in opportunities and positive outcomes
from our work. We support the idea that everyone can thrive if
we all work together toward common goals.
Collaboration is crucial to our success .
Achieving success in our economic development and social
equity aims will require strong partnerships between
government, business, and community. Collaboration between
the public and private sectors, combined with engagement
from all parts of society, is required for our visionary plan to
produce enduring, life-changing outcomes.
Efforts must be time-constrained, data-driven, and
measurable .
We will develop a blueprint with specific strategies and tactics
designed to produce tangible results within 500 days (1⅓ years)
and long-term, transformational changes within a 5,000-day
time horizon (about 13.5 years). Our efforts will be driven by
data and informed by community experience and needs. We
will measure results with established methods, such as the
Opportunity Index, and create others that are customized to
our situation.
Process Timeline
The Health Care Innovation Advisory Group met five times between April and July 2021, identifying the opportunities and
challenges with the industry, and discussing recommendations to help create a health care innovation hub in Salt Lake City,
providing opportunity for all SLC residents.
Kickoff Meeting
Wednesday, April 28th
Noon to 1:30pm
2nd Meeting
Wednesday, May 19th
10am to 11:30am
3rd Meeting
Wednesday, June 9th
10am to 11:30am
4th Meeting
Wednesday, June 30th
10am to 11:30am
5th Meeting
Wednesday, July 21st
10am to 11:30am
Advisory Group & Process
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 15
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING16
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute I 411 East South Temple Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 I 801-585-5618 I gardner.utah.edu
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute Staff and Advisors
Leadership Team
Natalie Gochnour, Associate Dean and Director
Jennifer Robinson, Associate Director
Shelley Kruger, Accounting and Finance Manager
Colleen Larson, Administrative Manager
Dianne Meppen, Director of Survey Research
Pamela S. Perlich, Director of Demographic Research
Juliette Tennert, Chief Economist
Nicholas Thiriot, Communications Director
James A. Wood, Ivory-Boyer Senior Fellow
Staff
Eric Albers, Research Associate
Max Backlund, Senior Research Associate
Max Becker, Research Associate
Samantha Ball, Senior Research Associate
Mallory Bateman, Senior Research Analyst
Andrea Thomas Brandley, Research Associate
Kara Ann Byrne, Senior Research Associate
Mike Christensen, Scholar-in-Residence
Phil Dean, Public Finance Senior Research Fellow
John C. Downen, Deputy Director of Economic
and Public Policy Research
Dejan Eskic, Senior Research Fellow
Emily Harris, Senior Demographer
Michael T. Hogue, Senior Research Statistician
Mike Hollingshaus, Senior Demographer
Thomas Holst, Senior Energy Analyst
Meredith King, Research Associate
Jennifer Leaver, Senior Tourism Analyst
Levi Pace, Senior Research Economist
Shannon Simonsen, Research Coordinator
Joshua Spolsdoff, Senior Research Economist
Paul Springer, Senior Graphic Designer
Laura Summers, Senior Health Care Analyst
Natalie Young, Research Analyst
Faculty Advisors
Matt Burbank, College of Social and
Behavioral Science
Adam Meirowitz, David Eccles School of Business
Elena Patel, David Eccles School of Business
Nathan Seegert, David Eccles School of Business
Senior Advisors
Jonathan Ball, Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst
Silvia Castro, Suazo Business Center
Gary Cornia, Marriott School of Business
Wes Curtis, Community-at-Large
Theresa Foxley, EDCUtah
Dan Griffiths, Tanner LLC
Emma Houston, University of Utah
Beth Jarosz, Population Reference Bureau
Darin Mellott, CBRE
Chris Redgrave, Community-at-Large
Wesley Smith, Western Governors University
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute Advisory Board
Conveners
Michael O. Leavitt
Mitt Romney
Board
Scott Anderson, Co-Chair
Gail Miller, Co-Chair
Doug Anderson
Deborah Bayle
Cynthia A. Berg
Roger Boyer
Wilford Clyde
Sophia M. DiCaro
Cameron Diehl
Lisa Eccles
Spencer P. Eccles
Christian Gardner
Kem C. Gardner
Kimberly Gardner
Natalie Gochnour
Brandy Grace
Rachel Hayes
Clark Ivory
Mike S. Leavitt
Derek Miller
Ann Millner
Sterling Nielsen
Cristina Ortega
Jason Perry
Ray Pickup
Gary B. Porter
Taylor Randall
Jill Remington Love
Brad Rencher
Josh Romney
Charles W. Sorenson
James Lee Sorenson
Vicki Varela
Ex Officio (invited)
Governor Spencer Cox
Speaker Brad Wilson
Senate President
Stuart Adams
Representative Brian King
Senator Karen Mayne
Mayor Jenny Wilson
Mayor Erin Mendenhall
Partners in the
Community
The following individuals
and entities help support
the research mission of the
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute.
Legacy Partners
The Gardner Company
Intermountain Healthcare
Clark and Christine Ivory
Foundation
KSL and Deseret News
Larry H. & Gail Miller Family
Foundation
Mountain America Credit Union
Salt Lake City Corporation
Salt Lake County
University of Utah Health
Utah Governor’s Office of
Economic Opportunity
WCF Insurance
Zions Bank
Executive Partners
Mark and Karen Bouchard
The Boyer Company
Salt Lake Chamber
Sustaining Partners
Clyde Companies
Dominion Energy
Staker Parson Materials and
Construction
(HC)SLCHI Report B Nov2021
DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ERIN MENDENHALL
MAYOR
BEN KOLENDAR
DIRECTOR
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
_______________________ DATE RECEIVED: ___________
LISA SHAFFER, CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER DATE SENT TO COUNCIL: ___________
__________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: October 6th 2021
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Ben Kolendar, Department of Economic Development Director
SUBJECT: Health Care Innovation Blueprint
STAFF CONTACTS: Clark Cahoon, Technology and Innovation Advisor
(clark.cahoon@slcgov.com)
DOCUMENT TYPE: Information Item
RECOMMENDATION: Requesting direction and next steps from the City Council.
BUDGET IMPACT: NA
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Mayor Mendenhall launched the Tech Lake City initiative in January 2020 to attract more
innovation and technology talent to the City, and to help improve pathways to technology -based
education and employment for all City residents, particularly those in underserved and diverse
communities. This initiative has been executed alongside traditional economic dev elopment
activities, such as responding to developers’ requests for information and coordinating business
recruitment with state and regional agencies. Tech Lake City also represents a pivot to a more -
proactive approach focused on strengthening key sectors , starting with health care innovation, an
industry with tremendous potential for the future as the City explores apprenticeships and
internships that can lead to high-paying jobs. The culmination of this work by a multidisciplinary
group has led to the development of a Health Care Innovation Blueprint that will catalyze
economic development in the industry and forge Salt Lake City as a global leader in this sector
which has some of our best and brightest innovators and business leaders in the City and the
State.
Lisa Shaffer (Oct 7, 2021 14:48 MDT)
10/07/2021
10/07/2021
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
PREVIOUS WORK
• May 2019: Growing the life sciences industry has been a focus of the Salt Lake City
Economic Development team for a few years now. In early 2019, the Department of
Economic Development released a Life Sciences and Opportunity Zones Prospectus, which
was a first draft, a conceptual analysis of how to utilize Opportunity Zones to attract Life
Sciences companies to Salt Lake City. In that prospectus, there is a loosely -defined Life
Sciences corridor proposed, based largely on where existing companies are located.
• May 2020: The City Council created and funded the position of a Technology and
Innovation Advisor to further support this strategic industry. An early success is the City’s
work to secure public investment to match industry funding which ultimately led to the
creation of the BioHive in November of 2020, a public -private agency designed to connect
and promote the 1,100+ life sciences and health care innovation companies in and around
Salt Lake City.
• September 2020: City Council supported the initiative with a $50,000 investment,
which to date has raised more than $1,100,000 in public and private investment. BioHive
coordinates with its statewide sibling, BioUtah, and interacts with related innovation -
focused efforts like the Salt Lake Chamber’s newly created Wasatch I nnovation Network.
The work will also focus on Mayor Mendenhall’s desire to develop a ‘tech corridor,’ a
concentration of technology-based businesses in Salt Lake City to drive economic
development in the health care innovation sector and create high -paying jobs and
economic mobility for residents.
• May 2021: The Department of Economic Development collaborated with the Planning
Division to update the zoning code to allow for research and development, lab space, and
general technology and innovation activity to meet the needs of these industries and city
staff. This process is currently in motion as we make these necessary changes to help
connect with our overall strategy with Tech Lake City.
• 2021: The Department of Economic Development convened an advisory board with Kem
C. Gardner Policy Institute at the University of Utah to develop a Blueprint for Growing
Salt Lake City’s Health Care Innovation Economy, which would serve to catalyze this
health care innovation initiative. City Council selected Councilmember Dan Dugan to
participate in the convening. He was among the first to support and actively participate in
the development of the Health Care Blueprint. That support has been critical in getting
this Blueprint across the finish line. A final draft of th e document will be shared and
discussed with the City Council at an upcoming work session briefing.
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY & HEALTH CARE INNOVATION
The premise for this Blueprint is simple: Build on Salt Lake City's economic strengths in health
care innovation, provide expanded economic opportunity and improved health and well -being for
all residents. This is a new, deliberately people -focused approach to economic development that
looks to address underlying communitywide challenges like improving residents’ income mobility
and access to economic opportunities.
The opportunities in the health care innovation sector are plentiful and “sticky,” meaning they
tend to stay in one place once they are established – for example, at the University of Utah’s
health sciences campus, Research Park, and, increasingly, in and near downtown Salt Lake City.
These jobs also tend to offer higher-than-average wages, provide multiple entry points at different
salary levels, and provide internships, apprenticeships and other oppor tunities for high school
and college students, making them particularly attractive for individuals from less -advantaged
and diverse communities.
Salt Lake City hosts more than 294,000 jobs, or about 19 percent of all jobs in Utah, and 40
percent of all jobs in Salt Lake County. Utah’s health care innovation jobs are focused on research,
testing, and medical laboratories – a noted strength of Salt Lake City, which is home to 46 percent
– nearly half – of the state’s total Utah’s professional, scientific, and technical services
employment.
Salt Lake City is the state’s premier employment center and the growth center for life sciences
jobs, but many of these opportunities are filled by non -resident commuters. Of Salt Lake City’s
residents, 43.2 percent of working residents live and work in Salt Lake City, while 56.8 percent of
City residents commute elsewhere for work. Of those employed in Salt Lake City, 83.1 percent live
outside the area.
While jobs in the City are plentiful, opportunities to secure aren’t equ ally available to residents
because of lack of opportunity, or more specifically, lack of access to opportunity. Indeed, the
Opportunity Index score for Salt Lake County is a below-par C+. The Opportunity Index,
produced by the nonprofit group Opportunity Nation, measures not just a community’s economic
health, but how available economic opportunities are to all residents, and how well a community
provides the social support needed to increase economic mobility. The Opportunity Index, in
whole or part, will be an ongoing measure of success for the City’s economic development efforts.
Access to economic opportunity for individuals varies across geographies. Nationally, rates of
income mobility have steadily fallen since 1940. This is primarily due to decreasi ng economic
growth and an increasingly unequal distribution of growth. Increasing economic growth is not
enough to increase rates of income mobility; growth must occur across the income
spectrum. Areas with high income mobility share five basic characteri stics: less residential
segregation, less income inequality, better primary schools, greater social capital, and greater
family stability.3
Of these characteristics, social capital is one of the most important connections between economic
development and increasing opportunity for all. Social capital refers to the existence of mutual
support and cooperation, networks of trust, institutional effectiveness, goodwill, and civic virtue.
Community development efforts, like the City’s Blueprint, encompass these c haracteristics into a
structure for positive and purposeful collective action.
PUBLIC PROCESS
The process to develop the Blueprint included outreach to multiple economic development and
health care-related agencies and enterprises to gather data and request involvement. An Advisory
Group was established with 20 representatives from these organizations to provide expert advice
on industry and community needs and opportunities, along with input on potential
recommendations. This highly engaged group, which includes Salt Lake City Council Member Dan
Dugan, met five (5) times over six (6) months to help shape the Blueprint.
In addition, representatives from the Kem C. Gardner Institute and the City’s Department of
Economic Development have met with a variety of organizations to seek feedback on the ideas and
draft recommendations in the Blueprint. These meetings to check in with interested groups and
individuals continue to take place.
VISION OF THE BLUEPRINT
Vision: Salt Lake City will be a premier health care innovation hub that provides expanded
economic opportunity and improved health and well-being for all residents.
HIGH LEVEL RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BLUEPRINT
• Growing and maintaining Salt Lake City's reputation as one of the nation's top
locations for health care innovation is instrumental to the City's success. We offer
three recommendations to help accomplish this:
o Build global brand;
o Reach out, lift up; and
o Highlight successful innovation.
• Identify available, accessible, and affordable education a nd training opportunities to
supply the workforce for Salt Lake City's fast-growing health care innovation
economy. We offer four recommendations to help accomplish this:
o Promote STEM learning;
o Create education-to-workforce partnership;
o Connect pathways;
o identify alternative pathways.
• Increase Investment. With the objective of increasing social and income mobility through
the Health Care Innovation industry, the City can help inform and connect available public
and private funding to innovative entrepreneurs. We offer three recommendations to help
accomplish this:
o Pursue untapped resources;
o Capitalize on private capital; and
o maximize social impact bonds.
• Strengthen Foundation & Remove Barriers. Salt Lake City's health care innovation
ecosystem is only as strong as the foundation that supports it. Streamlined regulations and
up-to-date information can help the industry flourish. We offer four recommendations to
help accomplish this:
o Create a baseline;
o Reduce business barriers;
o Inventory R&D opportunities;
o Ensure space is available.
Scheduling a work session briefing soon for the City Council is the subject of this transmittal.
While City Council approval of the Blueprint is not required, recommendations may require future
financial resources to implement.
Mayor Mendenhall, Natalie Gochnour, Ben Kolendar and Clark Cahoon will be at the table to
present and answer any questions.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Draft Health Care Innovation Blueprint
A Blueprint for Growing Salt Lake City’s
Health Care Innovation Economy
October 2021
[SLC
Logo]
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURINGii
VISION
Salt Lake City will be a premier health care innovation
hub that provides expanded economic opportunity and
improved health and well-being for all residents.
Table of Contents
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 1
October 2021
Dear Friends,
Salt Lake City enjoys a well-rounded and growing economy that offers most residents and businesses plentiful
opportunities for success and prosperity.
Some residents, though, lack access to the educational and employment opportunities that many take for
granted. This leaves individuals and families behind, economically and socially, and creates an imbalance in our
community’s overall wealth and well-being that affects us all.
We’re working to change that. Everyone in Salt Lake City deserves a chance to learn, earn, and be part of a
thriving community.
That’s why my administration, through our Tech Lake City initiative, is invigorating our focus on inclusive growth
that empowers upward mobility for both residents and businesses. Our focus for this human-centered approach
is the health care sector, an area in which Salt Lake City already boasts a flourishing foundation of institutions and
businesses. With the highest concentration of life science-related jobs in the state located in the Capital City, we
have a tremendous opportunity to become a world-class hub for health care innovation.
This blueprint includes our vision, mission, guiding principles, action steps, and recommendations, to guide the
daily and long-term direction of Salt Lake City’s economic and social development efforts. It reflects our desire to
identify and strengthen community assets to ensure the City’s foundation supports structures that are fair,
equitable, inclusive, and diverse.
Much effort and many ideas have gone into building this plan, including the work of a multidisciplinary Health
Care Innovation Advisory Group convened for this purpose, along with work by City staff, the Gardner Institute,
and many other individuals and groups. It will be a management tool to guide our common vision, to unite people
and organizations, and to shape our City’s unique assets to build upward mobility of both businesses and people
to solve global challenges.
Not only will this approach improve the health of people locally and around the world, it will extend the capacity
to succeed to those who haven’t had the opportunity to do so.
Success will require collaboration and long-term effort by the private and public sectors. By working together,
we will reach our goal of raising Salt Lake City’s prominence as a worldwide hub for health care innovation, we will
build a more diverse, inclusive, and fair community.
We have an amazing opportunity in front of us, and we have momentum on our side. Let’s take up the challenge
to combine innovation with compassion to establish a thriving, inclusive, and equitable place called Salt Lake City.
Warmly,
Mayor Erin Mendenhall
Can/should we add a signature?
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING2
Utah’s economic heart. Salt Lake City is well-established as the economic hub of the
Wasatch Front, Utah as a whole, and the Intermountain West region. With nearly 300,000
jobs – 40% of all jobs in Salt Lake County; and nearly 20% of Utah’s total jobs – Salt Lake
City’s economy is large and diverse, although inextricably linked to the local and regional
economies.
Opportunities aren’t equally available. Despite its strengths and resiliency, not all residents
share in Salt Lake City’s economic success because of lack of opportunity, or more
specifically, lack of access to opportunity. Indeed, the Opportunity Index score for Salt Lake
County is a below-par C+. The Opportunity Index measures not just a community’s
economic health, but how available economic opportunities are to all residents, and how
well a community provides the social support needed to increase economic mobility. One
of the four main objectives of Mayor Mendenhall’s SLC 2021 Plan – “Creating inclusive and
equitable opportunity for all” – aims to address this need head-on.
Unique initiative considers social values and needs. Mayor Mendenhall has challenged
the City’s economic development team to create a strategy that addresses residents’
social, as well as economic, needs; reaches all communities; and considers the City’s
human capital, and not just its physical, financial, and intellectual forms of capital.
Focusing on health care innovation will broaden opportunity. With life sciences already a
pillar of the economy, Salt Lake City chooses to leverage it with the strengths in research
and development, manufacturing, financial services, entrepreneurship to emphasize the
region's leadership in healthcare innovation. Careers in health care innovation offer higher
than average wages, are "sticky" and not easily transferrable, are more recession-proof
compared to any other major industry in the state and provide a range of entry points at
different salary levels. This industry already has a diverse workforce, along with the ability to
scale apprenticeship and mentorship opportunities and connect to STEM education within
our school district. Our community colleges and universities offer a wide range of programs
from lab technician training, biomedical informatics, and genetic discovery, along with
programming that assists in re-skilling and up-skilling our community.
What is
‘Health Care
Innovation’?
The health care innovation
industry is a disruptor industry
including companies from the
life sciences, med tech, and
health tech industries aimed at
innovating and improving the
health care ecosystem.
It does not include doctor-
patient care.
A People-focused Approach to
Economic Development
The premise for this blueprint is simple: Build on Salt Lake City's economic strengths in
health care innovation and provide expanded economic opportunity and improved health
and well-being for all residents. This is a people-focused approach to economic development.
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 3
Brand, Promote, & Grow
Growing and maintaining Salt Lake City's
reputation as one of the nation's top
locations for health care innovation is
instrumental to the city's success. We offer three
recommendations to help accomplish this:
1. Build global brand;
2. Increase awareness of job opportunities; and
3. Highlight successes.
increase investment
With the objective of increasing social and
income mobility through the health care
innovation industry, the city can help
inform and connect available public and private funding
to support innovation ecosystem in the City. We offer
three recommendations to help accomplish this:
1. Maximize industry partnerships;
2. Capitalize on private capital; and
3. Target social impact investments.
Emphasize Pathways &
Partnerships
Available, accessible, and affordable
education and training opportunities are
imperative to supply as workforce for Salt Lake City's fast-
growing health care innovation economy. We offer three
recommendations to help accomplish this:
1. Create education-to-workforce partnerships;
2. Connect pathways; and
3. Identify alternative pathways.
Strengthen Foundation &
Remove Barriers
Salt Lake City's health care innovation
ecosystem is only as strong as the foundation
that supports it. Streamlined regulations and up-to-date
information can help the industry flourish. We offer four
recommendations to help accomplish this:
1. Create a baseline;
2. Reduce business barriers;
3. Inventory R&D opportunities; and
4. Ensure lab and office space is available.
Recommendations in Brief
These four pillars create the foundation to building a strong and sustainable
health care innovation industry and providing hyper-localized opportunities
for all of Salt Lake City’s residents.
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING4
Growing and maintaining
Salt Lake City’s reputation
as one of the nation’s and
world’s top locations for
health care innovation is
instrumental to the City’s
success. Here are
recommendations to
help accomplish this:
Build Global Brand – Establish and sustain Salt Lake City’s unique
position and brand in the national health care innovation ecosystem and
participate in national and global organizations to glean best practices
and raise awareness about the City. Partnering with BioHive, BioUtah, the
University of Utah, and others, is essential to expand the City’s reach by
sharing stories of our talent base to attract interest, attending and
sponsoring events inside and outside the state, and promoting innovative
efforts of local companies and initiatives.
increase Awareness of Job Opportunities – Create a
powerful grassroots messaging and outreach campaign focused on
engaging and educating underserved communities about opportunities
in the health care innovation sector. Partner with BioHive, BioUtah, local
nonprofit organizations, the Salt Lake City School District, and others, to
educate about potential career pathways, showcase successful role models,
and raise awareness of easy-to-access education and training options.
Highlight Successes – Demonstrate the City’s shift to people-
focused economic development efforts by promoting innovative and
successful ways the City and partner organizations are uplifting
underserved populations through the news media (local, national, and
global), social media, awards, and other channels. Continue to build and
strengthen relationships with public and private agencies in the health
care innovation sector and engage their support in coordinating a
consistent program of media relations.
Brand, Promote, & Grow
“Tech Lake City” is the overarching concept guiding Salt Lake City’s
current and future economic development efforts, the centerpiece of
which is the fast-growing health care innovation sector.
Mayor Mendenhall launched the Tech Lake City initiative in January
of 2020 to attract more innovation and tech talent to the City, and to
help improve pathways to tech education and employment for all City
residents, particularly those in underserved communities.
Tech Lake City represents a pivot to a more-proactive, non-traditional
approach to economic development focusing on strengthening key
sectors, starting with health care innovation.
A key example of this new approach is the City’s work to secure
investment to create BioHive, a public-private agency designed to
connect and promote the 1,100+ life sciences and health care
innovation companies in and around Salt Lake City. BioHive coordinates
with its statewide sibling, BioUtah, and interacts with related
innovation-focused efforts like the Salt Lake Chamber’s newly created
Wasatch Innovation Network.
The Tech Lake City initiative is managed by Clark Cahoon, technology
and innovation advisor in the Department of Economic Development,
and overseen by department director, Ben Kolendar.
Salt Lake City
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 5
With the objective of
increasing social and
income mobility through
the health care
innovation industry, the
City can help inform and
connect available public
and private funding to
support the innovation
ecosystem in the City.
Maximize industry Partnerships – To be successful, Salt Lake
City’s efforts require working closely with economic development
agencies at the state and local levels, as well as with health care innovation
industry organizations like BioUtah and BioHive, of which the City is a
founder. By closely analyzing the City’s specific needs, officials can identify
and fill gaps, while deepening important and symbiotic relationships.
Capitalize on Private Capital – Local, regional, and national banks,
along with Utah’s many industrial loan corporations (ILCs) and other
financial institutions, provide opportunities for tapping into Community
Reinvestment Act funds and other sources. Partnering with the Federal
Reserve is one way to convene and educate banks about the City’s people-
focused approach and how it offers new prospects for investing in
meaningful and lasting community and social impact. In addition,
convening an ongoing advisory group of local, national, and global funders
with industry expertise can help Salt Lake City officials understand funding
structures and opportunities, brainstorm and strategize funding approaches,
and seek advice on economic development efforts.
Target Social impact investments -- Salt Lake City is investigating
novel opportunities, such as directing public investment into community-
based programs to increase opportunity and economic mobility, particularly
on the City's west side, which historically has been redlined, marginalized,
and underserved. The two areas of focus are early childhood development
and workforce interventions, both of which can be integrated with the
City’s approach to focusing economic development in the health care
innovation industry.
Increase Investment
Chandana Haque
Selected as one of 30 Women
to Watch in 2021 by Utah
Business magazine, Chandana
is Executive Director of
Altitude Lab, Utah’s largest
incubator for growing
early-stage life science and
health care companies.
A collaboration launched in 2020 by biotech firm
Recursion and the University of Utah’s PIVOT Center,
Altitude Lab fills the critical role of lowering hurdles
for underrepresented entrepreneurs. The
organization’s aim is to foster socially responsible
entrepreneurship, job creation, and economic
productivity.
I’m proud that 80 percent of startups at Altitude Lab are led
by women and minorities. Their diversity enables them to
innovate and address the disparities they have experienced
first-hand. Providing founders with a network of top-tier, national
investors, something that is difficult for underrepresented
founders to access, can completely change the trajectory of their
startup, propelling them to not only compete but excel in our
fast-changing health care innovation landscape.
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING6
Available, accessible, and
affordable education and
training opportunities are
imperative to supply a
sustainable workforce for
Salt Lake City’s fast-
growing health care
innovation economy.
Tapping into existing
programs, and filling in
gaps to meet specific
needs, is fundamental to
the City’s success.
Create Education-to-Workforce Partnerships – Partner
with the Salt Lake City School District, STEM Action Center, BioHive,
BioUtah, and others, to help better meet the community’s education-to-
workforce needs. Involve higher education and industry partners to
define, refine, and customize, training and education efforts. Seek one or
more industry firms to join the effort as partners for mentoring and
internship/apprenticeship opportunities.
Connect Pathways – Partner with Talent Ready Pathways program to
create localized opportunities for students to engage in the health care
innovation industry. Create city-specific metrics to help guide the success
of the program within Salt Lake City.
identify Alternative Pathways - Survey industry businesses to
identify positions that typically require higher education or certification
that could be reassessed to include alternative pathways such as
apprenticeship, internships, skills tests, etc. Use survey results to create a
strategic plan on how to inform and motivate businesses to create more
alternative pathway opportunities for employees.
Emphasize Pathways & Partnerships
Keith Marmer
A holder of three patents and
founder of four companies,
Keith has helped raise more
than $1 billion in investment
capital for multiple startups
and overseen the creation of
more than 140 companies
during the last 30 years.
Now, as Chief Innovation & Economic Engagement
Officer for the University of Utah (the U), Keith
oversees the school’s globally-recognized PIVOT
Center. On behalf of the U, PIVOT Center serves as a
catalyst for the regional innovation economy,
integrating technology commercialization, corporate
engagement, and economic development.
Health care innovation is an area of existing strength for Salt
Lake City and Utah and the city and state are positioned well to
continue to make global impact. It’s a field that thrives and relies on a
constant supply of new ideas and approaches; the PIVOT Center sits
at that critical junction where laboratory innovations become
marketable, life-saving products and treatments. Moving the
economic needle – particularly to benefit those innovations with less
access to opportunity – will require ever-stronger partnerships
between education, industry, and government, something I’m
excited to see in this effort led by Mayor Mendenhall.
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 7
Salt Lake City’s health
care innovation
ecosystem is only as
strong as the foundation
that supports it.
Streamlined regulations
and up-to-date
information can help the
industry and businesses
flourish.
Create a Baseline – Collect citywide data on workforce development
needs, job growth, and wage growth within the health care innovation
industry to provide a baseline measurement and the ability to set thoughtful
and strategic goals. Identify and track a handful of key metrics to understand
how well the City’s economic development and social mobility objectives are
being met over time.
Reduce Business Barriers – Identify ways that city regulations and
zoning laws may be impeding the success of building a thriving health care
innovation ecosystem; then, identify and implement ways to resolve concerns.
inventory R&D Opportunities – Working with partners, identify cur-
rent and planned research and development activities by colleges and univer-
sities, health care providers, nonprofit organizations, and private companies.
Compile and analyze existing inventories to identify gaps and potential oppor-
tunities, such as promising but unrealized patents, then determine how best to
move forward with a short list of encouraging possibilities.
Ensure Space is Available – Creating a streamlined and collaborative
real estate plan to promote health care innovation industry incubator
development, wet lab spaces, and industry-friendly commercial land
development, prioritizing real estate opportunities to support the innova tion
ecosystem. Immediate efforts should focus on the Innovation Corridor already
underway, options for the development of city assets, and aligning plans with
University of Utah, Research Park, real estate development leaders.
Strengthen Foundation & Remove Barriers
Anh Hoang, PhD
A native of Salt Lake City’s Glendale
neighborhood, Anh has built a
successful career as a life sciences
entrepreneur with a doctorate in
biomedical engineering, thanks in
part to a college scholarship
from her father’s employer,
O.C. Tanner Company.
Anh co-founded Sofregen Medical Inc. in the Boston
area and serves as the firm’s Chief Science Officer. Under
her guidance, Sofregen developed the first product made
from reconstituted silk protein to be cleared by the FDA
for a medical use. Anh is also a faculty member at
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Catalyst
LinQ program and was a recipient of the 2018 Medtech
Boston 40 under 40 Healthcare Innovators.
My success can be anyone’s success if they have access to
education, training, and most importantly, mentors and role
models. That can be especially difficult for people living in
underserved communities like the one I grew up in. We need a
more direct approach to engage young people and demonstrate
the world of opportunities that await them. That’s why I’m excited
about Salt Lake City’s health care innovation initiative and am
eager to return to Utah to help make it a reality.
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING8
Cementing Salt Lake City’s role as a worldwide
health care innovator and leader rests on Utah’s
historic and current success. The fact is that many
innovative and economically strong health care
elements already support our community.
Amplifying this advantage will strengthen and
broaden our economic foundation of larger anchor
firms, as well as innovative spin-offs, that create new
ways of helping the world and offer opportunities
for well-paying and satisfying jobs for Salt Lake City
residents.
Being more successful requires the City and its
partners to effectively tell the story of our health care
innovation economy, within Utah and across the
nation and globe. BioHive, a recently established
industry association, is working to fill this need with
support from the City and public and private partners.
Our legacy of health care innovation and new
partnerships like BioHive allow us to seize the
moment and proactively shape the way our City
grows – with a clear focus on equity, social and
human capital, and a desire to reach our full potential
within an industry that improves and extends the
health and well-being of not only our residents, but
people everywhere.
Home-Grown Health Care Innovations
n Salt Lake City was the home of the first artificial heart
successfully implanted in a human. Retired dentist
Barney Clark lived 112 days with the device in his chest,
an advancement that attracted worldwide media
attention to University Hospital.
n The first hospital information system to integrate
patient data for clinical decision support – Health
Evaluation through Logical Programming, or HELP –
was developed here and led the way to worldwide
adoption of electronic medical records.
n The University of Utah is home to the Utah Population
Database, the nation’s only and world’s largest
repository for genetics, epidemiology, demography,
and public health data.
n We also have steady grant funding from the National
Institutes of Health, a top five technology transfer
ranking, as well as an overall employment growth rate
of 26% from 2012 to 2016.
n Founded in 1984 by University of Utah pathologists,
ARUP Laboratories has grown into a national nonprofit
and academic reference laboratory at the forefront of
diagnostic medicine. With more than 4,000 employees,
ARUP offers 3,000+ tests and test combinations and
processes over 50,000 specimens every day, 24/7.
Utah's Health Care Innovation Industry
More Than 1,100
Companies are part of the ecosystem
Life sciences
produces 8% of
Utah’s total GDP
Utah is 6th per capita
in life sciences investment in the U.S
Salt Lake area is
2nd in the nation
for medical device
employment concentration.
Economic Proof Points
Utah is 2nd in the nation
for annual growth
in life sciences employment growth
between 2012 and 2020.
Nation's highest
concentration of life sciences jobs – twice the national average.
Utah is 1 of just 4 states
with industry concentrations in multiple
health care innovation sectors, including
pharmaceuticals, medical devices and research,
testing, and medical laboratories.
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 9
Utah Life Sciences: Comparisons with Other Leading States
In 2020, Utah’s life sciences job growth reached an exceptional
7.2% amid nationwide employment gains in the industry
averaging 0.5%. Utah’s growth ranked second among the 20
largest state life sciences industries, eight of which contracted
since 2019.
Since 2007, even through business cycle fluctuations, growth
in the life sciences industry has outpaced the rest of Utah’s
economy. For example, life sciences employment gains were
robust in 2020 when the state experienced an overall 1.8%
contraction in average employment.
In 2020, Utah’s workforce concentration in life sciences
reached 1.9% of all employees, first among states and more
than double the national average of 0.9%. Utah had the 15th
most life sciences jobs of any state, which was high for the 31st
largest employed workforce in the U.S.
Within the life sciences industry, Utah compares favorably
among states in terms of workforce specialization in devices
(second), pharmaceuticals (fourth), research and laboratories
(eighth), and distribution (16th).
Figure 2. Life Sciences Workforce Specialization,
2015 and 2020
(Life Sciences Share of Total Employment in the Top 20 States)
Note: Employment shares represent all employees at life sciences companies, regardless
of occupation. Top 20 states selected by their 2020 life sciences employment level.
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
GA
TXWA
OH
NY
MI
FLTN
AZ
PA
CO
WI
CANC
MA
NJ
IN
MN
UT
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
1.8%
2.0%
0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000Life Sciences Employment as a Percent of Total EmploymentLife Sciences Employment
U.S. median = 0.6%
U.S. average = 0.9%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.7%
0.7%
0.8%
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
1.0%
1.2%
1.2%
1.4%
1.5%
1.7%
1.7%
1.9%
0.9%
0.5%
0.5%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.7%
0.8%
0.7%
0.7%
0.8%
0.9%
0.8%
0.7%
1.1%
1.1%
1.3%
1.4%
1.5%
1.4%
1.6%
0.8%
0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%
Georgia
Texas
Washington
Ohio
New York
Michigan
Florida
Tennessee
Arizona
Illinois
Pennsylvania
Colorado
Wisconsin
California
North Carolina
Massachusetts
New Jersey
Indiana
Minnesota
Utah
U.S.
2015 2020
IL
166.6
121.6
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020Life Sciences Industry Other Industries
Single-Year, 2019–2020
Figure 1. Life Sciences industry Annual Job Growth
Percentage Change for States with the 20 Largest Life Sciences
Industries
Note: Top 20 states selected by their 2020 life sciences employment level. Alaska and
Hawaii, not shown, were not among the states providing the most life sciences jobs.
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
0.3%
-0.2%
3.6%
1.1%-1.4%
-1.3%
2.0%
-2.8%
1.9%
3.2%
0.6%
-2.2%
-0.6%
-4.0%
1.8%
4.4%
7.1%
7.2%10.2%
-1.3%
-4.0% to 0.0%0.0% to 1.9%2.0% to 3.9%4.0% to 10.2%Not top 20
5.5%
7.0%
4.1%4.8%
6.1%
2.6%
2.1%
3.4%
2.5%
0.8%
1.8%
1.9%1.4%
3.6%
1.3%
0.9%
2.7%
3.8%2.1%
1.3%
Five-Year Average, 2015–2020
0.3%
-0.2%
3.6%
1.1%-1.4%
-1.3%
2.0%
-2.8%
1.9%
3.2%
0.6%
-2.2%
-0.6%
-4.0%
1.8%
4.4%
7.1%
7.2%10.2%
-1.3%
-4.0% to 0.0%0.0% to 1.9%2.0% to 3.9%4.0% to 10.2%Not top 20
5.5%
7.0%
4.1%4.8%
6.1%
2.6%
2.1%
3.4%
2.5%
0.8%
1.8%
1.9%1.4%
3.6%
1.3%
0.9%
2.7%
3.8%2.1%
1.3%
0.3%
-0.2%
3.6%
1.1%-1.4%
-1.3%
2.0%
-2.8%
1.9%
3.2%
0.6%
-2.2%
-0.6%
-4.0%
1.8%
4.4%
7.1%
7.2%10.2%
-1.3%
-4.0% to 0.0%0.0% to 1.9%2.0% to 3.9%4.0% to 10.2%Not top 20
5.5%
7.0%
4.1%4.8%
6.1%
2.6%
2.1%
3.4%
2.5%
0.8%
1.8%
1.9%1.4%
3.6%
1.3%
0.9%
2.7%
3.8%2.1%
1.3%
0.3%
-0.2%
3.6%
1.1%-1.4%
-1.3%
2.0%
-2.8%
1.9%
3.2%
0.6%
-2.2%
-0.6%
-4.0%
1.8%
4.4%
7.1%
7.2%10.2%
-1.3%
-4.0% to 0.0%0.0% to 1.9%2.0% to 3.9%4.0% to 10.2%Not top 20
5.5%
7.0%
4.1%4.8%
6.1%
2.6%
2.1%
3.4%
2.5%
0.8%
1.8%
1.9%1.4%
3.6%
1.3%
0.9%
2.7%
3.8%2.1%
1.3%
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING10
Salt Lake City Employment
Salt Lake City hosts more than 294,000 jobs, or about 19 percent of all jobs in
Utah, and 40 percent of all jobs in Salt Lake County. As Figure 1 shows, Utah
specializes in research, testing, and medical laboratories – a noted strength of
Salt Lake City, which is home to 46% of Utah’s professional, scientific, and
technical services employment. Salt Lake City is not just a premier employment
center for the state, it is a growth center for life sciences jobs.
While these industries include jobs outside of life sciences or health care, they
are indicators of the general state of jobs in the health care innovation sector
with companies in the life sciences manufacturing and research and
development industries.
Salt Lake City also employs a labor pool made up of non-resident commuters.
Of Salt Lake City’s residents, 43.2 percent of the working residents live and work
in the City while 56.8 percent of citizens commute outside of Salt Lake for work.
Of those employed in Salt Lake City, 83.1 percent live outside the area.
Table 2: Employment by industry, 2019
Employment Financial Services Life Sciences iT/Software
Salt Lake County 736,746 57,538 28,848 44,930
State of Utah 1,559,843 86,784 43,584 86,602
County Share of Industry Employment 47%66%66%52%
Source:
Table 1: industries in Healthcare innovation Employment, 2019
industry Salt Lake City
Salt Lake
County
Utah
County State of Utah
Share of industry in
Salt Lake County
Share of industry
in Utah
Manufacturing 25,895 57,834 19,679 136,893 44.8%18.9%
Professional/Scientific/Technical Services 50,506 60,548 21,946 109,824 83.4%46.0%
Health Care and Social Assistance 23,796 81,706 32,005 179,929 29.1%13.2%
Subtotal 100,197 200,088 73,630 426,646 50.1%23.5%
Total Employment 294,156 736,746 266,837 1,559,843 39.9%18.9%
Source:
Salt Lake City Resident Commuting Patterns
43.2
56.8
SLC Resident and
Employed in SLC
SLC Resident
Commuting Outside
16.9
83.1
SLC Resident
Employees
Non-SLC Resident
Employees
43.2
56.8
SLC Resident and
Employed in SLC
SLC Resident
Commuting Outside
16.9
83.1
SLC Resident
Employees
Non-SLC Resident
Employees
Salt Lake City Employment Commuting Patterns
43.2
56.8
SLC Resident and
Employed in SLC
SLC Resident
Commuting Outside
16.9
83.1
SLC Resident
Employees
Non-SLC Resident
Employees
43.2
56.8
SLC Resident and
Employed in SLC
SLC Resident
Commuting Outside
16.9
83.1
SLC Resident
Employees
Non-SLC Resident
Employees
70.4%
22.6%
24.6%
81.3%
18.0%
58.2%
55.2%
15.2%
11.6%
19.1%
20.2%
3.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Life Sciences Distribution
Drugs and Pharmaceuticals
Medical Devices and Equipment
Research, Testing, and Medical Laboratories
Utah Other States Other Countries
Figure 1: Utah Life Sciences industry Components, Share of Output Sold by Destination, 2017
Source: Utah Department of Workforce Services, Bureau of Economic Analysis, REMI PI+ economic model, and Biotechnology Innovation Organization.
The City's Blueprint incorporates economic metrics to pair
with broader City initiatives to create more opportunity for
residents. In this way, the Blueprint serves as both a community
and economic development tool.
The Blueprint's long-term goals on social mobility requires
metrics beyond the traditional economic development
measurements.
Tracking the City’s Opportunity index Score
Traditional economic development metrics track growth
indicators like the growth of the city’s tax base, job growth,
wage growth, private investment, and the amount of real estate
dedicated to life sciences. These metrics provide an
understanding of how much growth is happening, where, and
why it may be happening. By creating a baseline of these more
traditional economic development, or placemaking, metrics,
the City is able to track the progress and efficacy of the Blueprint
and make course corrections as necessary.
The City has also adopted Opportunity Index as a measure of
how well economic growth is distributed to the City’s
residents. This Index includes metrics housed in four areas of
community well-being:
• Economy
• Education
• Health
• Community
These metrics include data on employment, wages, income
inequality, housing, educational attainment, and insurance
coverage, among others.
Considering the Benefits of Social Capital
Access to economic opportunity for individuals varies across
geographies. Nationally, rates of income mobility have steadily
fallen since 1940. This is primarily due to decreasing economic
growth and an increasingly unequal distribution of growth.
Increasing economic growth is not enough to increase rates of
income mobility, the growth must occur across the income
distribution.1, 2 Areas with high income mobility share five basic
characteristics, including less residential segregation, less
income inequality, better primary schools, greater social capital,
and greater family stability.3
Of these characteristics, social capital is one of the most
important connections between economic development and
increasing opportunity for all. Social capital refers to the
existence of mutual support and cooperation, networks of
trust, institutional effectiveness, goodwill and civic virtue.4, 5
Community development efforts, like the City’s blueprint,
encompass these characteristics into a structure for positive
and purposeful collective action.6 It builds a community’s
capacity to improve the well-being of its residents based on
existing human, social, and economic assets.7 It also recognizes
that some factors affecting well-being are nonlocal factors, and
provides a realistic appraisal of opportunities and constraints.8
1. Chetty, R., et al. (2017). The Fading American Dream: Trends in Absolute Mobility. Science 356(6336): 398-406. Retrieved from https://opportunityinsights.org/paper/the-fading-
american-dream/
2. Wilkinson, K. (1991). The Community in Rural America. New York: Greenwood Press.
3. Chetty, R. et al. (2014). Where is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics 129(4): 1553-1623, 2014.
Retrieved from https://opportunityinsights.org/paper/land-of-opportunity/
4. U.S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee. (2018). Social Capital Project: “The Geography of Social Capital in America.” Retrieved from https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/
republicans/2018/4/the-geography-of-social-capital-in-america
5. Wilkinson, K. (1991). The Community in Rural America. New York: Greenwood Press.
6. Wilkinson, K. (1991). The Community in Rural America. New York: Greenwood Press.
7. Flora, C.B. and Luther, V. (2000). An Introduction to Building Community Capacity. Small Tow and Rural Economic Development: A Case Studies Approach. Connecticut: Praeger
Publishers.
8. Wilkinson, K. (1991). The Community in Rural America. New York: Greenwood Press.
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 11
Measurements for Growth
The Blueprint's long-term goals on social mobility requires metrics beyond the traditional
economic development measurements.
Opportunity index
The Opportunity Index was jointly developed by
Opportunity Nation and Measure of America and measures
16 indicators, scoring all 50 states plus Washington DC on a
scale of 0-100 each year. In addition, more than 2,600
counties are graded A-F, giving policymakers and leaders a
useful tool to identify areas for improvement and to gauge
progress over time.
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING12
A crucial part of developing this blueprint was to identify
opportunities and challenges facing Salt Lake City and the
health care innovation industry. Members of the Advisory
Group, stakeholders, and the project team, viewed this task
through the lens of the guiding principles, a set of foundational
concepts embedded throughout the process.
Opportunities and challenges were identified for four types
of “capital,” three of which – physical capital, intellectual capital,
and financial capital – are commonly assessed in economic
development planning. The fourth, human and social capital,
adds the perspective of the City’s current and future workforce
and residents, and their ability to succeed – a complex,
undervalued, and critical factor for creating this plan.
Once articulated, the opportunities and challenges were
analyzed and organized into four common thematic areas to
help define and shape Salt Lake City’s approach to people-
centered economic development. In turn, the thematic areas
provided structure to help organize the blueprint’s
recommendations, which are outlined on the following pages.
Physical Capital
Opportunities:
n Crossroads of the West
n Interconnected transportation
systems
n Utah's urban & cultural core
Challenges:
n Limited resources (e.g. land, real
estate, water, broadband, lab space)
n Lack of "center" for health care
innovation
Human & Social Capital
Opportunities:
n Growing # of STEM grads (but still need more)
n Strong social & economic mobility in SLC
n Strong sense of community
n Relatively low wages/COL compared nationally
n Growing support networks (BioHive, BioUtah, etc.)
Challenges:
n Lack of diversity
n Lack of coordination between support networks
n Competency vs. credential gap for available workers
n Negative cultural & environmental concerns
Financial Capital
Opportunnities:
n Low tax rate
n Strong small business programs
n Strong philanthropic culture
n Strong banks & ILCs
Challenges:
n Low VC funding
n No philanthropic focus for health
care innovation
n Lack of CRA/city coordination
intellectual Capital
Opportunities:
n Research university with robust health
sciences in SLC
n Established Research Park in SLC
n Growing population of potential workers
Challenges:
n Lack of incubators & accelerators from
Research Park
n Lack of diversity in industry & government
Common Themes
That Define
Salt Lake City's Role
Frame & Brand
Convene & Connect
Inspire & Invest
Support & Sustain
FOUNDATiON—Elements integral to All Activities
n Inclusive, equitable growth
n Global perspective, interconnected region
n Leverage existing assets
n Focused attention, long-term horizon
n Public/private/community collaboration
n Time-constrained, data-driven, measurable
Opportunities and Challenges
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 13
Health Care Innovation Advisory Group
These advisory group members were selected to create a fabric across the city that will create an interconnected web within our
health care innovation community as we embark on filling gaps, building upon our strengths, and bring organizations together as
we tap into the capital city’s full potential.
Jared Bauer
CEO, IONIQ Sciences
David Bearss
Senior Managing Director, Therapeutic Labs
Silvia Castro
Director, Suazo Business Center
Ginger Chinn
VP of Public Policy, Salt Lake Chamber
Colby Colley
VP of Business Development, EDCUtah
Kelvyn Cullimore
CEO, BioUtah
Victor Garcia
Global VP, Varex Imaging
Miles Hansen
President and CEO, World Trade Center Utah
Chandana Haque
Executive Director, Altitude Lab & Recursion
Anh Hoang
Founder, Life Science Fund
Sara Jones
CEO and Founder, Inclusion Pro
John Librett
President, Survivor Wellness
Keith Marmer
Chief Innovation & Economic Engagement Officer, University
of Utah
Heidi Hall
Senior Advisor and Project Consultant, Intermountain
Healthcare
Katelin Roberts
Interim Director, BioHive
Scott Romney
Manager Talent Ready Utah, GoUtah
Melisa Stark
Commissioner of Apprenticeship Program, Dept. of
Workforce Services
Blake Thomas
Director of SLC Community & Neighborhoods Department
Danny Walz
CEO, SLC RDA
Supporting Staff:
Max Backlund, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Clark Cahoon, Salt Lake City Economic Development
Meredith King, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Siobhan Locke, The Langdon Group
Dianne Olson, The Langdon Group
Jennifer Robinson, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Paul Springer, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Brian Wilkinson, Wilkinson Ferrari & Co
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING14
The following principles guide the Gardner Institute and the
Governance Advisory Group in the discussion and
development of the Blueprint.
Leverage our unique assets to unite people and
organizations.
We acknowledge the significant role that health care research,
systems, design, and manufacturing play in Salt Lake City,
home to two-thirds of Utah’s jobs in this sector. We seek to
better connect organizations and people to increase
employment, raise average incomes, and improve the
community’s health and well-being. We will identify needs and
gaps to build on our advantages and ensure long-term
economic competitiveness.
Lasting economic prosperity requires focused attention
and willingness to forego short-term gains when needed.
We seek to unlock the full potential of our health care
innovation ecosystem to ensure opportunity and advance
prosperity for all residents of Salt Lake City. We will do this by
broadening traditional economic development approaches to
focus equally on equity, diversity, and inclusion of those who
are often overlooked. We also recognize that fundamental,
lasting economic improvements may require changes by
governments and the investment of public and private dollars
in different ways.
Our regional economy is an interconnected web.
We recognize that health care innovation and economic
development do not respect jurisdictional boundaries. While
our efforts are focused on Salt Lake City, the entire Wasatch
Front region will share in opportunities and positive outcomes
from our work. We support the idea that everyone can thrive if
we all work together toward common goals.
Collaboration is crucial to our success.
Achieving success in our economic development and social
equity aims will require strong partnerships between
government, business, and community. Collaboration between
the public and private sectors, combined with engagement
from all parts of society, is required for our visionary plan to
produce enduring, life-changing outcomes.
Efforts must be time-constrained, data-driven, and
measurable.
We will develop a blueprint with specific strategies and tactics
designed to produce tangible results within 500 days (1⅓ years)
and long-term, transformational changes within a 5,000-day
time horizon (about 13.5 years). Our efforts will be driven by
data and informed by community experience and needs. We
will measure results with established methods, such as the
Opportunity Index, and create others that are customized to
our situation.
Process Timeline
The Health Care Innovation Advisory Group met five times between April and July 2021, identifying the opportunities and
challenges with the industry, and discussing recommendations to help create a health care innovation hub in Salt Lake City,
providing opportunity for all SLC residents.
Kickoff Meeting
Wednesday, April 28th
Noon to 1:30pm
2nd Meeting
Wednesday, May 19th
10am to 11:30am
3rd Meeting
Wednesday, June 9th
10am to 11:30am
4th Meeting
Wednesday, June 30th
10am to 11:30am
5th Meeting
Wednesday, July 21st
10am to 11:30am
Advisory Group & Process
A BLUEPRINT FOR GROWING SALT LAKE CITY’S HEALTH CARE INNOVATION ECONOMY 15
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute I 411 East South Temple Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 I 801-585-5618 I gardner.utah.edu
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute Staff and Advisors
Leadership Team
Natalie Gochnour, Associate Dean and Director
Jennifer Robinson, Associate Director
Shelley Kruger, Accounting and Finance Manager
Colleen Larson, Administrative Manager
Dianne Meppen, Director of Survey Research
Pamela S. Perlich, Director of Demographic Research
Juliette Tennert, Chief Economist
Nicholas Thiriot, Communications Director
James A. Wood, Ivory-Boyer Senior Fellow
Staff
Eric Albers, Research Associate
Max Backlund, Senior Research Associate
Max Becker, Research Associate
Samantha Ball, Senior Research Associate
Mallory Bateman, Senior Research Analyst
Andrea Thomas Brandley, Research Associate
Kara Ann Byrne, Senior Research Associate
Mike Christensen, Scholar-in-Residence
Phil Dean, Public Finance Senior Research Fellow
John C. Downen, Deputy Director of Economic
and Public Policy Research
Dejan Eskic, Senior Research Fellow
Emily Harris, Senior Demographer
Michael T. Hogue, Senior Research Statistician
Mike Hollingshaus, Senior Demographer
Thomas Holst, Senior Energy Analyst
Meredith King, Research Associate
Jennifer Leaver, Senior Tourism Analyst
Levi Pace, Senior Research Economist
Shannon Simonsen, Research Coordinator
Joshua Spolsdoff, Senior Research Economist
Paul Springer, Senior Graphic Designer
Laura Summers, Senior Health Care Analyst
Natalie Young, Research Analyst
Faculty Advisors
Matt Burbank, College of Social and
Behavioral Science
Adam Meirowitz, David Eccles School of Business
Elena Patel, David Eccles School of Business
Nathan Seegert, David Eccles School of Business
Senior Advisors
Jonathan Ball, Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst
Silvia Castro, Suazo Business Center
Gary Cornia, Marriott School of Business
Wes Curtis, Community-at-Large
Theresa Foxley, EDCUtah
Dan Griffiths, Tanner LLC
Emma Houston, University of Utah
Beth Jarosz, Population Reference Bureau
Darin Mellott, CBRE
Chris Redgrave, Community-at-Large
Wesley Smith, Western Governors University
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute Advisory Board
Conveners
Michael O. Leavitt
Mitt Romney
Board
Scott Anderson, Co-Chair
Gail Miller, Co-Chair
Doug Anderson
Deborah Bayle
Cynthia A. Berg
Roger Boyer
Wilford Clyde
Sophia M. DiCaro
Cameron Diehl
Lisa Eccles
Spencer P. Eccles
Christian Gardner
Kem C. Gardner
Kimberly Gardner
Natalie Gochnour
Dr. Michael Good
Brandy Grace
Rachel Hayes
Clark Ivory
Mike S. Leavitt
Derek Miller
Ann Millner
Sterling Nielsen
Cristina Ortega
Jason Perry
Ray Pickup
Gary B. Porter
Taylor Randall
Jill Remington Love
Brad Rencher
Josh Romney
Charles W. Sorenson
James Lee Sorenson
Vicki Varela
Ted Wilson
Ex Officio (invited)
Governor Spencer Cox
Speaker Brad Wilson
Senate President
Stuart Adams
Representative Brian King
Senator Karen Mayne
Mayor Jenny Wilson
Mayor Erin Mendenhall
Partners in the
Community
The following individuals
and entities help support
the research mission of the
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute.
Legacy Partners
The Gardner Company
Intermountain Healthcare
Clark and Christine Ivory
Foundation
KSL and Deseret News
Larry H. & Gail Miller Family
Foundation
Mountain America Credit Union
Salt Lake City Corporation
Salt Lake County
University of Utah Health
Utah Governor’s Office of
Economic Opportunity
WCF Insurance
Zions Bank
Executive Partners
Mark and Karen Bouchard
The Boyer Company
Salt Lake Chamber
Sustaining Partners
Clyde Companies
Dominion Energy
Staker Parson Materials and
Construction
INCLUSIVE, EQUITABLE & ENDURING16
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke
Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:November 16, 2021
RE: Up to $55 Million of Bonds for Capital
Improvements (Series 2021A and 2021B)
NEW INFORMATION
The Administration transmitted a revised proposal for the capital improvements bond. The original and revised
proposals are compared in the summary table on the next two pages. The bond has fewer projects and increased
funding for several projects which reflect increased cost estimates partly caused by pandemic-related economic
circumstances as well as time lapse from original estimates. Major changes include:
- Total project costs for bond funding decreased by $4,137,000 from $57,090,000 to $52,953,000
- The split of projects between the three categories is nearly evenly split in the revised proposal:
o 38% for parks and public lands projects
o 32% for transportation projects
o 30% for facilities projects
- 11 projects are recommended for funding instead of the original 16
- 7 projects have increased funding amounts
- 6 projects were removed
- 1 project has decreased funding (Glendale Water Park Redevelopment)
o The Administration indicates an upcoming budget amendment would include transferring $3.2
million of parks impact fee from Pioneer Park Redevelopment to Glendale Water Park
Redevelopment.
- 1 new project is added (Folsom Trail Landscaping)
Design to Budget Approach: Three parks projects (Glendale Water Park, Pioneer Park and Westside
Neighborhood Parks) would use a “design to budget approach” meaning there are no current designs to use for
an Engineering provided cost estimate. Rather the projects would be designed later to fit within the bond
funding level based on public engagement feedback and construction prices at a future date. (note: sometimes
there is a gap between public expectations during the engagement phase, and available budget during the
construction phase such as scope reductions due to increased costs)
30% Contingencies for Five Projects: Transformer Replacements, Fisher Mansion, Warm Springs, Urban Wood
Reutilization, and Cemetery Road Repairs include 30% contingencies in the estimated costs to account for the
uncertainty of construction prices and inflationary pressures.
Project Timeline:
Budget Hearings: May 18 & June 1, 2021
1st Briefing: June 1, 2021
2nd Briefing: September 14, 2021
3rd Briefing: November 16, 2021
4th Briefing: TBD
Bond Public Hearing: TBD
Potential Action: TBD
Note: there is no legal deadline for the Council to
authorize, adjust or decline the proposed bond
Page | 2
Priority Revised
Funding
Original
Funding Project Name %Notes
1 $6,100,000 $2,500,000
Central Plant
Electrical
Transformer Upgrade
& Emergency Backup
Generators
11%
• Rocky Mountain Power requires by 2024
• Without backup generators some systems
and public services would be unavailable
during a power outage
• $3.6 million increase over original
• Cost based on 70% construction designs
2 $6,800,000 $10,000,000 Glendale Water Park
Redevelopment 12%
• In FY22 CIP, the Council approved $3.2
million for this project, and in FY21
$225,000 for creating a redevelopment plan
• $3.2 million decrease from original, offset
by future budget amendment to shift parks
impact fees (bringing total back to $10m)
• Administration would propose in a future
budget opening to shift $3.2 million of parks
impact fees from Pioneer Park to this project
• Federal requirement for at least some
active recreation by April 27, 2024
• Design to budget approach
3 $8,600,000 $5,200,000 Pioneer Park
Improvements 15%
• In FY20 CIP, the Council approved $3.445
million of parks impact fees for Pioneer Park
improvements. Admin is proposing to shift
these to Glendale Water park.
• $3.4 million increase over original
• Design to budget approach
4 $6,100,000 $6,100,000 Westside Railroad
Quiet Zones 11%
• Three at grade crossings would be
improved to create a single quiet zone in
residential neighborhood
5 $4,000,000 $3,400,000 Westside Park
Improvements 7%
• Locations are Modesto Park, Poplar Grove
Park and Jackson Park
• See Attachment 2 for the project
description was missing from the transmittal
• $600,000 increase over original
• Design to budget approach
6 $1,800,000 $1,500,000 Fisher Mansion
Stabilization 3%
• This funding is for structure stabilization
• Building would not be ready for public or
private uses
• In FY20 CIP, the Council funded almost
$1.4 million for restoration of the Carriage
House, and in FY21 another $504,732 for
construction overages
• $300,000 increase over original
• Could be combined with Warm Springs
Historic Plunge for $7.8 million available to
both historic buildings
7 $6,000,000 $3,000,000
Warm Spring Historic
Plunge Structure
Stabilization
11%
• Building would not be ready for public or
private uses
• $3 million increase over original
• Could be combined with Fisher Mansion
for $7.8 million available to both buildings
8 $2,000,000 $1,700,000
Urban Wood
Reutilization
Equipment and
Storage Additions
4%
• New program would also require one or
two new full-time City employees
• Program is focused on recycling wood
rather sending to the landfill and could
generate modest savings / revenue
• $300,000 increase over original
Page | 3
Priority Revised
Funding
Original
Funding Project Name %Notes
9 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
City Cemetery Road
Repairs /
Reconstruction
2%
• Total road repairs and reconstruction
estimated at $12.5 million
10 $9,753,000 $4,000,000 600 North Corridor
Transformation 17%
• In FY22 CIP, the Council approved over
$1.8 million for this project
• $5,753,000 increase over original
• Large cost increase from $8.7 million
earlier this year to $14.5 million
11 $800,000 NEW Folsom Trail
Landscaping 1%
• New; not included in the original proposal
• 10 feet on both sides of trail including
irrigation, seeding, trees and surface cover
• Over $3.5 million total budget for
construction from multiple sources,
landscaping, lighting, and other amenities
were largely removed due to cost increases
REMOVED $7,500,000 Fisher Mansion
Restoration
• Building would be ready for public or
private uses with both projects funded
• In FY20 CIP, the Council funded almost
$1.4 million for restoring the Carriage House
REMOVED $3,000,000 Smith's Ballpark
Improvements
• Total deferred maintenance and
improvements identified by the Facilities
condition index (industry best practice) is
estimated at over $12.7 million
REMOVED $5,250,000
Foothills Master Plan
Phase 2 & 3
Trailheads
• Five trailhead locations are identified,
three would have restrooms, no property
acquisitions would be necessary
• In FY19 and FY21 CIP, the Council
approved over $1.1 million for Phase 1
implementation
• In FY22 CIP, the Council approved $1.7
million for implementing the Foothills
Master Plan
REMOVED $1,300,000
Allen Park Historic
Structures
Improvements,
Utilities including
Power and Activation
• The City purchased Allen Park in FY20 for
$7.5 million
• In FY21 CIP, the Council approved
$450,000 for property protection, public
pathways and consultant services
• In FY22 CIP, the Council approved
$420,000 for this same project
REMOVED $1,200,000
Public Lands
Multilingual
Wayfinding Signs
• Locations are TBD, approximately 35 signs
per Council District
• See Attachment 2 for an additional project
description
REMOVED $440,000 Jordan River Paddle
Share at 1700 South
• Three already funded boat ramps within
Salt Lake City are expected to be complete
this year for a total of four
TOTALS 52,953,000 57,090,000
Green = Parks &
Public Lands
Blue = Facilities
Orange =
Transportation
100%
• Additional funding up to $55 million
includes costs of issuing the bonds and
premium from investors
• Depending on timing of Council approval
and bond sales, an interest only payment
may be needed in FY22 and the first full
payment would be in FY23
Page | 4
NEW POLICY QUESTIONS
Many of the project-specific and general policy questions in the first staff report (listed down below) remain
relevant to the revised proposal. The Council may wish to review the earlier questions in addition to the new
ones listed in this section.
1.Splitting $7.8 Million between Fisher Mansion and Warm Springs Historic Plunge – The
Council may wish to discuss with the Administration whether the funding should be considered
combined or separate for these two buildings. The revised proposal includes a note stating the $1.8
million to stabilize Fisher Mansion and the $6 million for Warm Springs Historic Plunge could be
combined. However, the two funding amounts are listed, and the projects ranked separately. It’s worth
noting that the Fisher Mansion is estimated to be 2,800 square feet of interior space and Warm Springs
40,785 square feet. A 2018 development scenario to make Warm Springs ready for public and/or private
uses estimated the total construction cost at $6.5 million. The cost for a similar development is likely
significantly higher in the current economy.
2.Historic Preservation and Disposal of Underutilized Property – In earlier discussions some
Council Members raised the question to what extent is the City’s role in preserving historic buildings?
Council Members also expressed an interest in fully funding a development scenario for the Fisher
Mansion and/or Warm Springs Historic Plunge to be ready for public and/or private uses. Council
Members may wish to discuss the City’s role and what amount would be necessary for the bond to make
these historic buildings ready for use.
3.Conditions on Projects and/or Bond – The Council may wish to discuss whether to add any
conditions on the bond funding or requests to the Administration such as providing status updates to
the public as projects progress, notification of any scope reductions or making project funding
contingent upon certain conditions.
4.How to Use $3.3 Million Not Needed this Fiscal Year – In the annual budget, the Council added
$3.6 million into CIP as a placeholder for the first full debt payment on the new bonds. Depending on
the timing of Council approval and sale of the bonds there might be an interest only payment near the
end of the current fiscal year. This means approximately $3.3 million would not be needed this fiscal
year and could be used for another purpose such as moving to Fund Balance or on other capital projects.
The Administration has recently suggested that this funding could be used to match a legislative ask
relating to irrigation at the Cemetery. Any usage of these funds would need to be approved by the
Council in a budget amendment (or annual budget). The Council may wish to discuss if it makes sense
strategically to approve this prior to the upcoming legislative session.
5.Larger Margin between Project Costs and Authorized Bond Total – The Council may wish to
ask the Administration why the margin more than doubled between the project costs and the authorized
bond total the Council would approve in the resolution. The original resolution had a $910,000 margin
which covers additional costs of issuance for the bond. The revised proposal has a resolution with a
$2,047,000 margin.
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
On May 21, the Council received the Mayor’s bond proposal (Attachment 1) requesting the Council approve a
bond up to $58 million for 16 capital improvements. Project descriptions are shown on pages three and four of
Attachment 1. A table summarizing the proposed bond-funded projects is also available in this report on pages
two and three. The projects include restoration of historic City-owned buildings, quality of life and safety
improvements on streets, and nearly half the funding would go to enhancements of parks and public lands.
Two Bonds: One Taxable, Another Tax-exempt – The proposed funding is split between $22,490,000 for tax-
exempt projects and $34,600,000 for taxable projects. A project requires partial or full taxable bond funding if
the resulting use is for private and/or for-profit. A taxable bond is more expensive financing than tax-exempt
because of the additional tax cost and potential for a higher interest rate. The bonds can be structured to only
pay interest for the first six months, 12 months, or 18 months. This approach could delay the first full debt
payment of interest and principal until next fiscal year but at a greater total cost because a larger amount of
interest would be paid over the life of the bond.
Project Cost Estimates – The Council could discuss with the Administration about doing additional public
engagement and/or design for some projects to better define designs (amenities, locations, programming, etc.)
Page | 5
and costs before approving a bond. Most of the proposed projects do not have detailed budget breakdowns or
engineering reviewed designs. Note that a few projects have gone through public engagement efforts such as the
600 North corridor transformation and Glendale Waterpark redevelopment. Some City construction projects
have experienced double-digit price increases this year due to pandemic-related economic impacts. It’s unclear
how long these price fluctuations will continue. The Council could request a review of cost estimates, increase
project-specific contingency funding, and/or add a general contingency reserve available to any project.
Process to Adopt – It’s important to note that the proposed sales tax revenue bond only requires Council
approval unlike a General Obligation bond which requires voter approval at the ballot box. The Council would
need to adopt a public hearing resolution, set the date, and hold at least one public hearing about the bond. The
Council would also need to adopt a delegating bond resolution that formally authorizes the bond sales and
identifies eligible projects and scopes. There is no legal deadline for the Council to authorize, adjust or decline
the proposed bond.
Funding Opportunity after Older Bond Paid Off Last Year – The Administration is proposing the bond now
because an approximately $80 million bond was paid off in FY21 which removed $5.3 million of annual debt
payments. The Mayor is recommending a new, smaller bond up to $58 million for 16 capital improvements
around the City. In large part the size of the bond proposed is to account for the size of the debt service fitting
into the proposed FY 22 budget (the proposed budget had a placeholder). As part of the FY21 CIP debt service
budget, the Council included $3,657,667 for a first-year payment on the proposed bond. This funding could be
used for other purposes if the Council declines to proceed with the bond or approves a smaller bond. If the
Council approves a bond larger than $58 million, then
additional funding would need to be identified to make the
first-year payment, or the Council could work with the
Administration to identify timing of first-year payment. Long
term the Council could accommodate larger bond payments
but would need to adjust the budget to remain balanced.
Projects Overview of $58 Million Bond Proposal – The pie
chart shows almost half of the bond funding would construct
enhancements to parks and public lands, a third would
address deferred maintenance at City buildings and create a
new facility and the remaining 19% would go to
transportation and streets reconstruction. Note that the City
is about halfway through the 2018 voter-approved $87
Million Streets Reconstruction Bond. More ongoing funding
for street reconstructions and overlays will be needed after
the bond funds are gone. A third of four bond issuances
totaling $87 million is planned later this year. The table below
summarizes projects by category, proposed funding,
percentage of total bond funding and notes such as recent
Council funding for the project from other sources, total
funding needs when known and related info.
Category $ Amount Project Name % of
Bond Notes
$ 7,500,000 Fisher Mansion
Restoration 13%
- Building would be ready for public or private
uses with both projects funded
- In FY20 CIP, the Council funded almost $1.4
million for restoration of the Carriage House
$ 3,000,000
Warm Spring
Historic Plunge
Structure
Stabilization
5%
- This would be for initial life/safety
improvements. Building would not be ready
for public or private uses
$ 3,000,000 Smith's Ballpark
Improvements 5%
- Total deferred maintenance and
improvements identified by the Facilities
condition index (industry best practice) is
estimated at over $12.7 million
Facilities &
Real Estate
$ 2,500,000 Central Plant
Electrical 4%- Required by Rocky Mountain Power by 2024
Facilities &
Real Estate,
34%
Transportation
& Streets, 19%
Parks & Public
Lands, 47%
% of $58 Million Bond by Category
$19.2 Million
$11.1 Million
$26.79 Million
Page | 6
Category $ Amount Project Name % of
Bond Notes
Transformer
Upgrade
$ 1,700,000
Urban Wood
Reutilization
Equipment and
Storage
3%
- New program would also require one or two
new full-time City employees
- Program is focused on recycling wood rather
sending to the landfill and could generate
modest savings / revenue
$ 1,500,000 Fisher Mansion
Improvements 3%
- This funding is for structure stabilization
- Building would be ready for public or private
uses with both projects funded
- In FY20 CIP, the Council funded almost $1.4
million for restoration of the Carriage House
Subtotal $ 19,200,000 34%
$ 6,100,000
Westside
Railroad Quiet
Zones
11%
- Three at grade crossings would be improved
to create a single quiet zone in residential
neighborhood
$ 4,000,000
600 North
Corridor
Transformation
7%
- In FY22 CIP, the Council approved over $1.8
million for this projectTransportation
& Streets
$ 1,000,000
City Cemetery
Road Repairs /
Reconstruction
2%
- Total road repairs and reconstruction
estimated at $12.5 million
Subtotal $ 11,100,000 19%
$ 10,000,000
Glendale Water
Park
Redevelopment
18%
- In FY22 CIP, the Council approved 3.2
million for this project
$ 5,200,000 Pioneer Park
Improvements 9%
- In FY20 CIP, the Council approved $3.445
million of parks impact fees for Pioneer Park
improvements. Public engagement is currently
ongoing for selecting amenities and locations
$ 5,250,000
Foothills Master
Plan Phase 2 & 3
Trailheads
9%
- Five trailhead locations are identified, three
would have restrooms, no property
acquisitions would be necessary
- In FY19 and FY21 CIP, the Council approved
over $1.1 million for Phase 1 implementation
- In FY22 CIP, the Council approved $1.7
million for implementing the Foothills Master
Plan
$ 3,400,000 Westside Park
Improvements 6%
$ 1,300,000
Allen Park
Historic
Structures
Improvements,
Utilities
including Power
and Activation
2%
- The City purchased Allen Park in FY20 for
$7.5 million
- In FY21 CIP, the Council approved $450,000
for property protection, public pathways, and
consultant services
- In FY22 CIP, the Council approved $420,000
for this same project
Parks & Public
Lands
$ 1,200,000
Public Lands
Multilingual
Wayfinding
Signs
2%
Page | 7
Category $ Amount Project Name % of
Bond Notes
$ 440,000
Jordan River
Paddle Share at
1700 South
1%
- Three already funded boat ramps into the
Jordan River within Salt Lake City are
expected to be complete this year for a total of
four
Subtotal $ 26,790,000 47%
TOTAL $ 57,090,000 100%
$300+ Million Unfunded Capital Needs Over Next Decade – Below is a list of the City’s unfunded capital needs
from large single-site projects to long-term best management of capital assets like buildings, streets, and
vehicles. This list is not comprehensive, and some costs may be higher since originally estimated. The total
unfunded needs of the below list exceed $300 million and may be closer to $500 million depending on the
specifics of new construction and major redevelopments in the first section. Note that these estimates for new
assets do not include maintenance costs. The Council may wish to ask the Administration about their progress
on a City Capital Facilities Plan. Typically, these documents identify, track, prioritize and schedule unfunded
capital needs over a long-term horizon. This could include identifying future bond opportunities based on the
City’s current schedule of when bonds will be paid off. Note that the proposed bond includes funding for some
projects in the below list. Redevelopment Agency projects are not included in the below list. However, the
Council has previously taken a “whole City” perspective and leveraged multiple funding sources to complete
RDA projects including use of the City’s bonding capacity.
Costs TBD for potential new construction and major redevelopments:
o Old Public Safety Building
o Fleet Block mixed-use redevelopment potentially including housing, green space and
commercial
o Eastside Police Precinct
o Crime lab building out (currently leasing space)
o Multiple aging fire stations and training facilities need renovations or possible demolition and
rebuild
o Renovation of historic structures like Fisher Mansion and Warm Springs Historic Plunge
o The old main library downtown (The Leonardo) renovations such as escalator
replacement/removal
o Expansion of the S-Line Streetcar which received $12 million in State funding to reach Highland
Drive
o Downtown and/or 400 West TRAX loops
o Railroad quiet zones on the westside
o Undergrounding rail lines that divide the City’s west and east sides (aka “Train Box” proposal)
o Implementing rest of the 9-Line and McClelland urban trails construction, landscaping,
amenities, and ongoing maintenance
o Downtown Green Loop regional park
o Build out of the multi-phase Foothills Master Plan
o Wingpointe Levee on Surplus Canal reconstruction to meet federal and state standards
$133 million over ten years (in addition to existing ongoing funding level) to increase the overall
condition index of the City's street network from poor to fair
$50.9 million above the FY22 recommended funding level over next 10 years to fully fund the City’s
Fleet needs
$47.7 million over ten years to bring all actively used City facilities out of deferred maintenance
$25 million for capital improvements at the City Cemetery, of which $12.5 million is for road repairs
$20 million for a new bridge at approx. 4900 West from 500 South to 700 South
$12.7 million for deferred maintenance and improvements at the Smiths Ballpark
$7 million for multiple bridge replacements that span the Jordan River
$6 million for planned upgrades to the Regional Athletic Complex
$3.1 million for downtown irrigation system replacement
$2 million for streets crew facility upgrades like asphalt steam bay and salt storage
$1.3 million for solar panels, parking canopy and security upgrade at Plaza 349
Page | 8
PROJECT SPECIFIC POLICY QUESTIONS
A.Adding, Removing and/or Changing Funding Level for Projects – The Council may wish to
discuss with the Administration if there are projects the Council wants to add, remove, and/or change
the proposed funding level. Does the Council want additional information on any proposed projects
before scheduling a vote? The Council may also wish to discuss if the bond funding by category (see pie
chart and table above) aligns with the Council’s policy priorities.
B.Cost Estimates and Contingency Funding – The Council may wish to ask the Administration when
the cost estimates were calculated and to what extent contingency funding accounts for the uncertainty
of market pricing caused by global supply chain fluctuations and other pandemic impacts to the
economy. The Administration stated projects include a 20% contingency. The Council could explore
adding a larger contingency to each project or adding a contingency / reserve available to all projects.
C.Conflicting Proposals for Same Property: Urban Wood Reutilization Program and Tiny
Home Village – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if either project could be located at
another location. The Public Lands Department stated that the location is important for a new urban
wood reutilization program and is located next to the existing Public Lands building, which staff
understands is the same location as the proposed Tiny home village.
D.End User(s) for Restoration of Fisher Mansion, Warm Springs Historic Plunge and Allen
Park – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration what end users are intended for
restoration of these three historic facilities?
E.Projects Increasing Workload and Need for New Full-time Employees: The Council may wish
to ask the Administration which projects would create the need for new full-time employees, when that
new staffing need would begin (pending completion of construction in some cases), and how they would
be funded. An initial review of the 16 proposed projects indicates the following would create new
ongoing staffing workloads: Allen Park for property management and art programming/events, Urban
Wood Reutilization new program needs staff to operate equipment, paddle share new program with
some locker automation but also new administration and logistics work.
F.Expanding the City’s in-house Sign Shop – The Council may wish to continue the discussion from
the annual budget about options to expand the City’s existing in-house sign shop. The Public Services
Department stated the shop operates at capacity and additional employees would be needed.
GENERAL POLICY QUESTIONS
1.Need and Ability to Spend Tax-exempt Bond Funds within Three Years – The Council may
wish to ask the Administration how tax-exempt bond funds will be spent within the legally required
three years, especially if additional engagement/design work is needed to finalize costs. This could
include the Engineering Division’s capacity to absorb the additional workload, availability of contractors
in the local market, phasing projects over multiple bond issuances (which is a common strategy), and if
CIP projects could be delayed because they are not subject to the three-year spending deadline. While
taxable bond funds do not have a legally required spending deadline there is a practice concern to spend
before they lose significant amounts of purchasing power.
2.$300+ Million Unfunded Capital Needs and $58 Million Bond Proposal – The Council may
wish to discuss how to balance the City’s $300+ million unfunded capital needs including deferred
maintenance for existing assets with funding construction of new assets that will create new unfunded
maintenance needs including increased staffing workloads.
3.Public Engagement – The Council may wish to discuss what public engagement should look like for
the bond and individual projects. The Council may also wish to ask the Administration about public
engagement efforts for projects so far and how residents can provide feedback on the other projects.
4.Project Prioritization – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration which projects to
prioritize for the following situations:
a. Excess funds are available to go to another project
b. Actual costs exceed available project budget, and a project (or multiple projects) must be
reduced in scope
Page | 9
c. A project will not be constructed because available funding is significantly less than needed even
after scope reductions
5.American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funding for Bond Projects – The Council may wish to
discuss with the Administration the option to use ARPA funding for two bond projects that are eligible
under the Treasury’s interim guidance: $4 million West Side Neighborhood Park Improvements and
$1.2 million Multilingual Wayfinding Signs. Note that the projects would need to be within qualified
Census tracts to be fully eligible. See Attachment 3 for the ARPA infographic and Attachment 4 for a
map of qualified Census tracts.
6.CIP Debt Level – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration what debt level in CIP is
preferred to balance long-term bond payments with annual CIP project funding needs. The proposed
bonds would have an annual debt service payment over $3.6 million. See Additional Info section for
debt service projects to FY26.
7.Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for a status update
on the CFP (10-Year Comprehensive CIP Plan). It’s envisioned as a living document that prioritizes
capital needs across City plans and departments within funding constraints. The Council held a briefing
in January 2019 about a first draft and expressed interest in identifying measurable goals to accomplish
through the CFP and guide prioritization of project planning (see Attachment 5).
ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION
CIP Debt Load Projections through FY26
The Administration provided the following chart to illustrate the ratio of ongoing commitments to available
funding for projects over the next six fiscal years. Most of these commitments are debt payments on existing
bonds. Other commitments include, ESCO debt payments, the Crime Lab lease, capital replacement funding for
parks and facilities, contributions to the CIP cost overrun account and the 1.5% for art fund. The CIP Budget
Book includes an overview and details on each of the ongoing commitments. 79% of the General Fund transfer
into CIP was needed for these ongoing commitments in FY21. Note that the chart does not reflect the proposed
bond which would increase annual debt service payments and reduce funding available for CIP projects.
The projected debt load significantly decreased in FY22 because Series 2014A Taxable Refunding of 2005 bonds
matured (paid off). It was approximately $80 million when the bond was originally issued (before refunding).
This reduces the debt load from 79% to 45% and removes a $5.3 million annual debt payment. The Mayor is
recommending a new sales tax revenue bond totaling $58 million with an estimated annual debt payment over
$3.6 million. Note that General Obligation (G.O.) bonds are not paid from CIP because they are funded through
a separate, dedicated voter-approved property tax increase.
Page | 10
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Allocation of CIP General Fund Transfer Amount, 6 Year
Projection, assuming 2% revenue growth per year, and
continued allocation of 7% of GF revenue to CIP
Debt Service On Bonds Other Debt Service Othe r Commit ments Pay as You G o Pro jec ts
Cost Overrun Account
At the time of publishing this staff report, the account has an available to spend balance of $910,720. The
Council established this account for projects that experience costs slightly higher than budgeted. A formula
determines how much additional funding may be pulled from the Cost Overrun account depending on the total
Council-approved budget. This process allows the Administration to add funding to a project without returning
to the Council in a budget amendment. A written notification to the Council on uses is required. The purpose is
to allow projects to proceed with construction instead of delaying projects until the Council can act in a budget
amendment which typically takes a few months.
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) (See Attachment 5)
The CFP is a comprehensive 10-year CIP plan. See Attachment 6 for a summary of the Council’s requests and
guidance during the January 2019 briefing from the Administration and discussion. It’s important to note, the
Council expressed interest in identifying a couple measurable goals to accomplish through the CFP and guide
prioritization of project planning.
Fisher Mansion Feasibility Analysis
SLC has commissioned CRSA Architects to conduct a feasibility analysis for restoring and establishing active use
in the Fisher Mansion building. CRSA’s work will look at a series of conceptual alternatives, including the
adaptive reuse of the Mansion as a food & beverage + music & art venue, and alternately as a café and exhibition
gallery space with office space for city staff and/or community organizations, along with a reimagined outdoor
plaza for activities and events.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Transmittal for Proposed $58 Million Sales Tax Bonds Series 2021A and 2021B
2. Description for $3.4 Million Investment in Westside Parks (was not included in transmittal)
3. ARPA Budget Update Infographic August 17, 2021
4. 2021 HUD Qualified Census Tracts Map
5. Capital Facilities Plan Council Requests from January 2019
Page | 11
ACRONYMS
ARPA – American Rescue Plan Act
CAN – Community and Neighborhoods Department
CFP – Capital Facilities Plan
CIP – Capital Improvement Program
ESCO – Energy Service Companies
FY – Fiscal Year
G.O. Bond – General Obligation bond
HUD – U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department
MARY BETH THOMPSON
Chief Financial Officer
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 245
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114
TEL 801-535-6403
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
_________________________ Date Received: __________________
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: ______________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: May 20, 2021
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer ________________________________
SUBJECT: Salt Lake City Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A and 2021B
STAFF CONTACT: Marina Scott, City Treasurer
801-535-6565
DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing
RECOMMENDATION: 1) That the City Council hold a discussion on June 15, 2021 in anticipation of
adopting a Bond Resolution for the aforementioned bond issue; 2) That the City Council consider
adopting a Bond Resolution on July 13, 2021 approving the issuance and sale of up to $58,000,000
principal amount of Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A and 2021B (the “Bonds”), and
give authority to certain officers to approve the final terms and provisions of and confirm the sale of
the Bonds within certain parameters set forth in the attached Bond Resolution.
BUDGET IMPACT:
Tax- Exempt Sales Tax and Excise Tax Revenue Bond, Series 2021A – $22,490,000:
Proceeds from the Bonds will be used to finance the cost of the various capital improvement
projects. The list of the capital improvement projects to be financed by this bond issue is attached.
The City’s Bond Counsel has reviewed the attached list of projects and provided their
recommendations to the tax status of the bonds. The list is color-coded to reflect their responses.
Responses highlighted in green are for projects that are eligible for tax-exempt financing.
Responses highlighted in yellow are for projects that are eligible for tax-exempt financing but have
potential private business use.
rachel otto (May 21, 2021 13:58 MDT)
05/21/2021
05/21/2021
Salt Lake City Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A and 2021B
Transmittal to City Council
May 11, 2021
Page 2 of 2
Responses highlighted in red are projects that either have or are likely to have private business use.
The Administration proposes to issue tax-exempt bonds for the projects highlighted in green for the
total of $22,490,000.
Based on preliminary estimates and the current interest rate environment, annual debt service costs
would average $1,307,595 per year for 21 years. Attached are preliminary numbers including
estimated sources and uses of funds as well as debt amortization schedules.
Taxable Sales Tax and Excise Tax Revenue Bond, Series 2021B - $34,600,000:
The Administration proposes to issue taxable bonds for the projects highlighted in yellow and red for
the total of $34,600,000.
Based on preliminary estimates and the current interest rate environment, annual debt service costs
would average $2,111,765 per year for 21 years. Attached are preliminary numbers including
estimated sources and uses of funds as well as debt amortization schedules.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The table below summarizes the proposed bond issue:
NEW MONEY
New Money Project List $57,090,000
Tax-Exempt (green highlight) $22,490,000
Taxable (red & yellow
highlights) $34,600,000
The current plan calls for the Bonds to be sold on August 25, 2021.
An estimated debt service, a draft copy of the authorizing resolution of the City are included for your
review. Please keep in mind that these are preliminary drafts and are subject to change.
The Certificate of Determination will need to be signed by the Mayor and Council Chair or their
respective designees on the afternoon of the date of pricing and sale of the bonds, which is currently
scheduled for August 25, 2021.
Attachments
cc: Mary Beth Thompson, Boyd Ferguson, Steven Bagley, Lisa Shaffer, Mathew Cassel, Lorna Vogt,
Cory Rushton, Blake Thomas.
Department Project Dollar Amount Description
Facilities CCB Transformer 2,500,000$ CCB Transformer Need square footage of all buildings served by the transformer. May have
private business use of the portion serving the Leonardo. Depending on private
payments and other private business use, consider financing portion relating to
Leonardo on a taxable basis.
CAN Warm Springs historic
structure stabilization
3,000,000$ Full roof, flashing, drain replacement. Chimney stabilization. Lateral force tier 3 seismic
upgrade. Stucco and window treatment.
Since the City is treating the direct and indirect costs of the improvements as a
capital expenditure, entire project is eligible for tax-exempt financing.
PL Urban Wood Reutilization
Equipment and Storage
Additions
1,700,000$ Storage Building, Equipment Awning, Fencing, Lighting, Utilities to develop a fully
functional Urban Wood Reutilization facility $1,700,000. Horizontal Grinder: Primary
piece of equipment, will produce landscape mulch and EWF playground surface
$1,100,000. Wood Mill: Mill will produce lumber products from urban trees $200,000.
Base on project as described, including usage of wood, entire project is eligible
for tax-exempt financing. Wood sales, if any, should be to general public.
PL Public Lands Multilingual
Wayfinding Signage
1,200,000$ This proposal is for Wayfinding signage throughout the City for the Parks, trails and
natural lands system.
Eligible for tax-exempt financing.
PL Jordan River Paddle Share
improvements at Exchange
Club Marina 1700 S 7 JR
440,000$
Bond-funded infrastructure includes paddle share lockers (2 locations) with functional life
of 20+ years, reconstruction of Paddle Share/River Access parking with improved
entryway, signage & crosswalk/RRFB pedestrian crossing to existing restroom at 17th
South River Park. Funding for additional paddle-share stations that would compliment
this project is currently being requested from other sources (grants).
Eligible for tax-exempt financing.
CAN Fisher Mansion
improvements and
1,500,000$
Concrete, masonry and seismic, thermal and moisture protection.
Since the City is treating the direct and indirect costs of the improvements as a
capital expenditure, entire project is eligible for tax-exempt financing.
PL Allen Park Activation Historic
Structures
1,300,000$ Adaptive re-use/restoration of historic residences in Allen Park to allow them to serve as
artist studio spaces similar to Balboa Park Spanish Village model, with more frequent
rotation of artists & art residencies. Improvements to Allen Park site to accommodate
frequent gallery strolls, art & music festivals, etc. Will it include power source to allow
food trucks, events, etc.? Will full utility upgrades be needed as the structures are now on
septic systems.
Based on currently described project and the City's intention to treat the direct
and indirect costs of the improvements as capital expenditures, the project is
eligible for tax-exempt financing; however, there could be private business use
and payments. The City will need to actively monitor to ensure compliance with
short term exceptions and potentially management contracts (see prior email
and memo).
Trans 600 North Complete Street
Transformation
4,000,000$ A low-cost phase 1 is already funded. Our latest cost estimate shows that we only need
$8.7M, but construction prices keep going up, so that doesn't give much wiggle room. Any
construction that impacts PU? Yes. We have been and will continue to coordinate with
them.
Eligible for tax-exempt financing.
PL West Side Neighborhood
Parks
3,400,000$ Early stages of planning. Should be able to finance with tax-exempt financing;
however, repairs could count against 5% working capital limit and there could be
private business use. The City will likely need to actively monitor to ensure
compliance with short term exceptions.
CAN Fisher Mansion restoration 7,500,000$
The full restoration would allow for end uses including community gathering space, venue
for music/art & special events, and potentially a commercial kitchen for food & beverage
service and/or leasable office space.
Leasable office space would create private business use and private payments.
Consider financing office space portion with taxable financing. Other portions of
the project could be financed on a tax-exempt basis since the City will treat the
direct and indirect costs of the improvements as capital expenditures. The City
would need to monitored to ensure compliance with short term exceptions.
PL Cemetery Road Repairs 1,000,000$ Eligible for tax-exempt financing.
PL Foothills Trails System, Phase
II, III, Trailheads & Signage
5,250,000$ See Foothills Trails System Plan for Trails Plan Phase II Scope. Major trailhead project
locations = Victory Road: 670 North Victory Road, Popperton Park: 1375 East Popperton
Park Way, Bonneville Blvd: 675 North Bonneville Boulevard, I Street: 925 Hilltop Road
Emigration: 2755 East Sunnyside. Bathrooms included at Bonneville Blvd, Popperton Park
and Victory Road. No Bathrooms included at Emigration or I Street. Phase III Trails
probably not feasible for construction within 3-year window so are excluded from this
budget and planned for future phase, and very possibly funded through external sources
including grants and private donations.
Eligible for tax-exempt financing.
Ballpark 3,000,000$ 1M-Security & Fencing 1M-Stadium Seating/Stairs Railings 1M Interiors Restrooms &
Elevator Still under evaluation and need additional information, but private business use
is probable as are private payments. Depending on determinations made with
other projects may want to consider taxable financing to provide flexibility.
Quiet Zones 6,100,000$ Eligible for tax-exempt financing.
PL Pioneer Park 5,200,000$ Pioneer Park has impact fee funding to develop new components in the park. This funding
would be utilized to rebuild comfort stations (restrooms), take out existing and build new
playground, tennis/pickleball reconstruction and to rebuild the event power for farmers
market and larger scale events. PL has a consultant preparing to start public engagement
in summer of 2021. This project can easily fit in the 3 year time line.
Based on currently described project and the City's intention to treat the direct
and indirect costs of the improvements as capital expenditures, the project is
eligible for tax-exempt financing; however, there could be private business use
and payments. The City will need to actively monitor to ensure compliance with
short term exceptions and any management contract for the concession stand
would need to be reviewed for compliance. May want to consider taxable
financing for the concession stand portion to provide flexibility.
PL Glendale Water Park 10,000,000$ The community's initial requests include a water feature (splash pad, indoor/outdoor pool
etc.) as well as options for open space use including increasing tree canopy, create natural
buffer zones for the river, community open spaces using the site's hills for viewing sheds
and outdoor classrooms. nostalgia-related public art installations to reflect the site’s
original water park use, a food truck court with eating areas, water sports rentals (in
coordination with the Jordan River), and a variety of meeting and seating areas around
the park. The community also has suggested nostalgia-related public art installations to
reflect the sites original water park use, foot truck court, water sports rentals and meeting
/ seating areas around the park, sports courts, recreation fields, perimeter
walking/running trails and an ADA-accessible playground. Lastly the community sees a
connected regional park, similar in scope to Liberty Park or Sugarhouse, connecting the
existing Glendale Park, 1700 South Park, Glendale Golf Course and the former Raging
waters site.
Early stages of planning. Should be able to finance with tax-exempt financing;
however, there could be private business use. The City needs to actively monitor
to ensure compliance with short term exceptions and management contract
guidelines, if applicable.
Total 57,090,000$
Preliminary; subject to change.
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
$53,640,000 SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2021 A&B
(September 16, 2021 )
($57.09M Projects)
Total Issue Sources And Uses
Dated 09/16/2021 | Delivered 09/16/2021
2021A TAX-
EXEMPT
2021B
TAXABLE
Issue
Summary
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $18,840,000.00 $34,800,000.00 $53,640,000.00
Reoffering Premium 3,759,835.65 -3,759,835.65
Total Sources $22,599,835.65 $34,800,000.00 $57,399,835.65
Uses Of Funds
Total Underwriter's Discount (0.275%)51,810.00 95,700.00 147,510.00
Costs of Issuance 56,520.00 104,400.00 160,920.00
Deposit to Project Construction Fund 22,490,000.00 34,600,000.00 57,090,000.00
Rounding Amount 1,505.65 (100.00)1,405.65
Total Uses $22,599,835.65 $34,800,000.00 $57,399,835.65
2021AB Comb New Money | Issue Summary | 5/20/2021 | 10:12 AM
Stifel
Prepared by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (EJR)Page 1
Preliminary; subject to change.
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
$53,640,000 SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2021 A&B
(September 16, 2021 )
($57.09M Projects)
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total
09/16/2021 -----
04/01/2022 --803,666.50 803,666.50 -
06/30/2022 ----803,666.50
10/01/2022 2,080,000.00 1.593%741,846.00 2,821,846.00 -
04/01/2023 --725,277.50 725,277.50 -
06/30/2023 ----3,547,123.50
10/01/2023 2,115,000.00 1.674%725,277.50 2,840,277.50 -
04/01/2024 --707,577.50 707,577.50 -
06/30/2024 ----3,547,855.00
10/01/2024 2,155,000.00 1.899%707,577.50 2,862,577.50 -
04/01/2025 --687,113.50 687,113.50 -
06/30/2025 ----3,549,691.00
10/01/2025 2,200,000.00 2.202%687,113.50 2,887,113.50 -
04/01/2026 --662,893.50 662,893.50 -
06/30/2026 ----3,550,007.00
10/01/2026 2,250,000.00 2.408%662,893.50 2,912,893.50 -
04/01/2027 --635,808.50 635,808.50 -
06/30/2027 ----3,548,702.00
10/01/2027 2,310,000.00 2.644%635,808.50 2,945,808.50 -
04/01/2028 --605,271.00 605,271.00 -
06/30/2028 ----3,551,079.50
10/01/2028 2,370,000.00 2.800%605,271.00 2,975,271.00 -
04/01/2029 --572,091.00 572,091.00 -
06/30/2029 ----3,547,362.00
10/01/2029 2,445,000.00 2.939%572,091.00 3,017,091.00 -
04/01/2030 --536,162.50 536,162.50 -
06/30/2030 ----3,553,253.50
10/01/2030 2,515,000.00 3.024%536,162.50 3,051,162.50 -
04/01/2031 --498,133.50 498,133.50 -
06/30/2031 ----3,549,296.00
10/01/2031 2,590,000.00 2.752%498,133.50 3,088,133.50 -
04/01/2032 --462,497.25 462,497.25 -
06/30/2032 ----3,550,630.75
10/01/2032 2,665,000.00 2.826%462,497.25 3,127,497.25 -
04/01/2033 --424,843.75 424,843.75 -
06/30/2033 ----3,552,341.00
10/01/2033 2,740,000.00 2.895%424,843.75 3,164,843.75 -
04/01/2034 --385,181.25 385,181.25 -
06/30/2034 ----3,550,025.00
10/01/2034 2,820,000.00 2.965%385,181.25 3,205,181.25 -
04/01/2035 --343,369.75 343,369.75 -
06/30/2035 ----3,548,551.00
10/01/2035 2,910,000.00 3.035%343,369.75 3,253,369.75 -
04/01/2036 --299,207.50 299,207.50 -
06/30/2036 ----3,552,577.25
10/01/2036 3,000,000.00 3.104%299,207.50 3,299,207.50 -
04/01/2037 --252,649.50 252,649.50 -
06/30/2037 ----3,551,857.00
10/01/2037 3,095,000.00 3.171%252,649.50 3,347,649.50 -
04/01/2038 --203,584.00 203,584.00 -
06/30/2038 ----3,551,233.50
10/01/2038 3,195,000.00 3.236%203,584.00 3,398,584.00 -
04/01/2039 --151,891.75 151,891.75 -
06/30/2039 ----3,550,475.75
10/01/2039 3,295,000.00 2.920%151,891.75 3,446,891.75 -
04/01/2040 --103,792.75 103,792.75 -
06/30/2040 ----3,550,684.50
10/01/2040 3,395,000.00 2.981%103,792.75 3,498,792.75 -
04/01/2041 --53,182.75 53,182.75 -
06/30/2041 ----3,551,975.50
10/01/2041 3,495,000.00 3.043%53,182.75 3,548,182.75 -
06/30/2042 ----3,548,182.75
Total $53,640,000.00 -$18,166,570.00 $71,806,570.00 -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $615,750.00
Average Life 11.479 Years
Average Coupon 2.9503159%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)2.3636613%
True Interest Cost (TIC)2.2524970%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.1028374%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)2.2817455%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 2.1873941%
Weighted Average Maturity 11.474 Years
2021AB Comb New Money | Issue Summary | 5/20/2021 | 10:12 AM
Stifel
Prepared by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (EJR)Page 2
Preliminary; subject to change.
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
$18,840,000 SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS
SERIES 2021A (September 16, 2021 )
($22.49M New Money, 20-Years Level)
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total
09/16/2021 -----
04/01/2022 --422,391.67 422,391.67 -
06/30/2022 ----422,391.67
10/01/2022 585,000.00 5.000%389,900.00 974,900.00 -
04/01/2023 --375,275.00 375,275.00 -
06/30/2023 ----1,350,175.00
10/01/2023 615,000.00 5.000%375,275.00 990,275.00 -
04/01/2024 --359,900.00 359,900.00 -
06/30/2024 ----1,350,175.00
10/01/2024 650,000.00 5.000%359,900.00 1,009,900.00 -
04/01/2025 --343,650.00 343,650.00 -
06/30/2025 ----1,353,550.00
10/01/2025 680,000.00 5.000%343,650.00 1,023,650.00 -
04/01/2026 --326,650.00 326,650.00 -
06/30/2026 ----1,350,300.00
10/01/2026 715,000.00 5.000%326,650.00 1,041,650.00 -
04/01/2027 --308,775.00 308,775.00 -
06/30/2027 ----1,350,425.00
10/01/2027 755,000.00 5.000%308,775.00 1,063,775.00 -
04/01/2028 --289,900.00 289,900.00 -
06/30/2028 ----1,353,675.00
10/01/2028 790,000.00 5.000%289,900.00 1,079,900.00 -
04/01/2029 --270,150.00 270,150.00 -
06/30/2029 ----1,350,050.00
10/01/2029 835,000.00 5.000%270,150.00 1,105,150.00 -
04/01/2030 --249,275.00 249,275.00 -
06/30/2030 ----1,354,425.00
10/01/2030 875,000.00 5.000%249,275.00 1,124,275.00 -
04/01/2031 --227,400.00 227,400.00 -
06/30/2031 ----1,351,675.00
10/01/2031 915,000.00 4.000%227,400.00 1,142,400.00 -
04/01/2032 --209,100.00 209,100.00 -
06/30/2032 ----1,351,500.00
10/01/2032 955,000.00 4.000%209,100.00 1,164,100.00 -
04/01/2033 --190,000.00 190,000.00 -
06/30/2033 ----1,354,100.00
10/01/2033 990,000.00 4.000%190,000.00 1,180,000.00 -
04/01/2034 --170,200.00 170,200.00 -
06/30/2034 ----1,350,200.00
10/01/2034 1,030,000.00 4.000%170,200.00 1,200,200.00 -
04/01/2035 --149,600.00 149,600.00 -
06/30/2035 ----1,349,800.00
10/01/2035 1,075,000.00 4.000%149,600.00 1,224,600.00 -
04/01/2036 --128,100.00 128,100.00 -
06/30/2036 ----1,352,700.00
10/01/2036 1,120,000.00 4.000%128,100.00 1,248,100.00 -
04/01/2037 --105,700.00 105,700.00 -
06/30/2037 ----1,353,800.00
10/01/2037 1,165,000.00 4.000%105,700.00 1,270,700.00 -
04/01/2038 --82,400.00 82,400.00 -
06/30/2038 ----1,353,100.00
10/01/2038 1,210,000.00 4.000%82,400.00 1,292,400.00 -
04/01/2039 --58,200.00 58,200.00 -
06/30/2039 ----1,350,600.00
10/01/2039 1,255,000.00 3.000%58,200.00 1,313,200.00 -
04/01/2040 --39,375.00 39,375.00 -
06/30/2040 ----1,352,575.00
10/01/2040 1,295,000.00 3.000%39,375.00 1,334,375.00 -
04/01/2041 --19,950.00 19,950.00 -
06/30/2041 ----1,354,325.00
10/01/2041 1,330,000.00 3.000%19,950.00 1,349,950.00 -
06/30/2042 ----1,349,950.00
Total $18,840,000.00 -$8,619,491.67 $27,459,491.67 -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $225,240.00
Average Life 11.955 Years
Average Coupon 3.8268033%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)2.1805479%
True Interest Cost (TIC)1.9544659%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.4430546%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.9803279%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 1.8125237%
Weighted Average Maturity 11.864 Years
2021AB Comb New Money | 2021A TAX-EXEMPT | 5/20/2021 | 10:12 AM
Stifel
Prepared by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (EJR)Page 4
Preliminary; subject to change.
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
$34,800,000 TAXABLE SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES
2021B (September 16, 2021 )
($34.6M New Money, 20-Years Level)
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total
09/16/2021 -----
04/01/2022 --381,274.83 381,274.83 -
06/30/2022 ----381,274.83
10/01/2022 1,495,000.00 0.260%351,946.00 1,846,946.00 -
04/01/2023 --350,002.50 350,002.50 -
06/30/2023 ----2,196,948.50
10/01/2023 1,500,000.00 0.310%350,002.50 1,850,002.50 -
04/01/2024 --347,677.50 347,677.50 -
06/30/2024 ----2,197,680.00
10/01/2024 1,505,000.00 0.560%347,677.50 1,852,677.50 -
04/01/2025 --343,463.50 343,463.50 -
06/30/2025 ----2,196,141.00
10/01/2025 1,520,000.00 0.950%343,463.50 1,863,463.50 -
04/01/2026 --336,243.50 336,243.50 -
06/30/2026 ----2,199,707.00
10/01/2026 1,535,000.00 1.200%336,243.50 1,871,243.50 -
04/01/2027 --327,033.50 327,033.50 -
06/30/2027 ----2,198,277.00
10/01/2027 1,555,000.00 1.500%327,033.50 1,882,033.50 -
04/01/2028 --315,371.00 315,371.00 -
06/30/2028 ----2,197,404.50
10/01/2028 1,580,000.00 1.700%315,371.00 1,895,371.00 -
04/01/2029 --301,941.00 301,941.00 -
06/30/2029 ----2,197,312.00
10/01/2029 1,610,000.00 1.870%301,941.00 1,911,941.00 -
04/01/2030 --286,887.50 286,887.50 -
06/30/2030 ----2,198,828.50
10/01/2030 1,640,000.00 1.970%286,887.50 1,926,887.50 -
04/01/2031 --270,733.50 270,733.50 -
06/30/2031 ----2,197,621.00
10/01/2031 1,675,000.00 2.070%270,733.50 1,945,733.50 -
04/01/2032 --253,397.25 253,397.25 -
06/30/2032 ----2,199,130.75
10/01/2032 1,710,000.00 2.170%253,397.25 1,963,397.25 -
04/01/2033 --234,843.75 234,843.75 -
06/30/2033 ----2,198,241.00
10/01/2033 1,750,000.00 2.270%234,843.75 1,984,843.75 -
04/01/2034 --214,981.25 214,981.25 -
06/30/2034 ----2,199,825.00
10/01/2034 1,790,000.00 2.370%214,981.25 2,004,981.25 -
04/01/2035 --193,769.75 193,769.75 -
06/30/2035 ----2,198,751.00
10/01/2035 1,835,000.00 2.470%193,769.75 2,028,769.75 -
04/01/2036 --171,107.50 171,107.50 -
06/30/2036 ----2,199,877.25
10/01/2036 1,880,000.00 2.570%171,107.50 2,051,107.50 -
04/01/2037 --146,949.50 146,949.50 -
06/30/2037 ----2,198,057.00
10/01/2037 1,930,000.00 2.670%146,949.50 2,076,949.50 -
04/01/2038 --121,184.00 121,184.00 -
06/30/2038 ----2,198,133.50
10/01/2038 1,985,000.00 2.770%121,184.00 2,106,184.00 -
04/01/2039 --93,691.75 93,691.75 -
06/30/2039 ----2,199,875.75
10/01/2039 2,040,000.00 2.870%93,691.75 2,133,691.75 -
04/01/2040 --64,417.75 64,417.75 -
06/30/2040 ----2,198,109.50
10/01/2040 2,100,000.00 2.970%64,417.75 2,164,417.75 -
04/01/2041 --33,232.75 33,232.75 -
06/30/2041 ----2,197,650.50
10/01/2041 2,165,000.00 3.070%33,232.75 2,198,232.75 -
06/30/2042 ----2,198,232.75
Total $34,800,000.00 -$9,547,078.33 $44,347,078.33 -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $390,510.00
Average Life 11.222 Years
Average Coupon 2.4447718%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)2.4692782%
True Interest Cost (TIC)2.4424344%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.4136979%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)2.4739105%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 2.4447718%
Weighted Average Maturity 11.222 Years
2021AB Comb New Money | 2021B TAXABLE | 5/20/2021 | 10:12 AM
Stifel
Prepared by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (EJR)Page 7
Draft of
5/20/21
Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) v3
8709966/RDB/mo
RESOLUTION NO. __ OF 2021
A Resolution authorizing the issuance and the sale of not to exceed
$58,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Sales and Excise Tax
Revenue Bonds, in one or more series, on a taxable or tax-exempt
basis, for the purpose of financing various City capital improvement
projects; authorizing the execution and delivery of one or more
supplemental trust indentures to secure said bonds; giving authority to
certain officials and officers to approve the final terms and provisions
of the bonds within the parameters set forth herein; authorizing the
taking of all other actions necessary for the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this resolution; and related matters.
*** *** ***
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), is a duly organized and existing city of the
first class, operating under the general laws of the State of Utah (the “State”);
WHEREAS, the City considers it necessary and desirable and for the benefit of the City to
issue its sales and excise tax revenue bonds, in one or more series, on a taxable or tax-exempt
basis, as hereinafter provided for the purpose of (a) financing all or a portion of the cost of (i)
acquiring, constructing and improving [various City parks, trails, historic structures, roads, streets,
intersections and electrical facilities], as further described in the below defined Supplemental
Indenture, and (ii) acquiring, constructing, improving and remodeling various other capital
improvement program projects (collectively, the “Series 2021 Project”); (b) funding any
necessary reserves and contingencies in connection with the Series 2021 Bonds (defined below)
and (c) paying all related costs authorized by law pursuant to authority contained in the the Local
Government Bonding Act, Chapter 14 of Title 11 (the “Act”), Utah Code Annotated 1953, as
amended (the “Utah Code”), and other applicable provisions of law;
WHEREAS, for the purposes set forth above, the City has determined (a) to issue its Sales
and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, in one or more series, in an aggregate principal amount not to
exceed $58,000,000 (the “Series 2021 Bonds”) (subject to the further limitations outlined herein)
pursuant to the Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as amended and
supplemented to the date hereof (the “Master Indenture”), a copy of which is attached here as
Exhibit A and one or more Supplemental Trust Indentures (the “Supplemental Indenture”),
between the City and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) (the
Master Indenture and the Supplemental Indenture are sometimes collectively referred to
hereinafter as the “Indenture”), and (b) to cause the proceeds of the sale of the Series 2021 Bonds
to be applied in accordance with the Indenture;
WHEREAS, the City is authorized by the Act to finance the Series 2021 Project, to enter into
the Supplemental Indenture, and to issue the Series 2021 Bonds to finance all or a portion of the
costs of financing the Series 2021 Project, to fund any necessary reserves, and to pay all related
costs authorized by law;
- 2 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
WHEREAS, Section 11-14-316 of the Utah Code provides for the publication of a Notice of
Bonds to be Issued (the “Notice of Bonds”) and the running of a 30-day contest period, and the
City desires to cause the publication of such Notice of Bonds at this time in compliance with said
section with respect to the Series 2021 Bonds;
WHEREAS, Section 11-14-318 of the Utah Code requires that a public hearing be held to
receive input from the public with respect to the issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds and the
potential economic impact that the Series 2021 Project will have on the private sector and that
notice of such public hearing be given as provided by law and, in satisfaction of such requirement,
the City desires to publish a Notice of Public Hearing and Intent to Issue Sales and Excise Tax
Revenue Bonds (the “Notice of Public Hearing”) pursuant to such Section;
WHEREAS, Section 11-14-307(7) of the Utah Code requires the City to submit the question
of whether or not to issue the Series 2021 Bonds to voters for their approval or rejection if, within
30 calendar days after the publication of the Notice of Public Hearing, a written petition requesting
an election and signed by at least 20% of the registered voters in the City is filed with the City;
and
WHEREAS, in the opinion of the City, it is in the best interests of the City that (a) the
Designated Officers (defined below) be authorized to approve the final terms and provisions
relating to the Series 2021 Bonds and to execute the Certificate of Determination (defined below)
containing such terms and provisions and to accept the offer of the underwriter for the Series 2021
Bonds (the “Underwriter”) for the purchase of the Series 2021 Bonds; and (b) the Mayor, the
Deputy Mayor or the Mayor’s designee (the “Mayor”), be authorized to execute the Official
Statement with respect to the Series 2021 Bonds, all as provided herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows:
Section 1. Issuance of Bonds. (a) For the purposes set forth above, there is hereby
authorized and directed the execution, issuance, sale and delivery of the Series 2021 Bonds in one
or more series (with such adjustments to the series designation as are necessary), on a taxable or
tax-exempt basis, in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $58,000,000. The Series 2021
Bonds shall be dated as of the date of the initial delivery thereof. The Series 2021 Bonds shall be
in authorized denominations, shall be payable, and shall be executed and delivered all as provided
in the Indenture. The Series 2021 Bonds shall be subject to redemption prior to maturity as
provided in the Indenture.
(b) The form of the Series 2021 Bonds set forth in the form Supplemental Indenture,
subject to appropriate insertions and revisions in order to comply with the provisions of the
Indenture, is hereby approved.
(c) The Series 2021 Bonds shall be special obligations of the City, payable from and
secured by a pledge and assignment of the Revenues (as defined in the Indenture) received by the
City and of certain other moneys held under the Indenture on a parity with any other Bonds (as
defined in the Indenture) issued from time to time under the Master Indenture, including but not
limited to the City’s (i) Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, (ii) Sales Tax Revenue Bonds,
- 3 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
Series 2013B, (iii) Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series
2014A, (iv) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B, (v) Sales and Excise Tax
Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A, (vi) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds,
Series 2019A and (vii) Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series
2019B. The Series 2021 Bonds shall not be obligations of the State or any other political
subdivision thereof, other than the City, and neither the faith and credit nor the ad valorem taxing
or appropriation power of the State or any political subdivision thereof, including the City, is
pledged to the payment of the Series 2021 Bonds. The Series 2021 Bonds shall not constitute
general obligations of the City or any other entity or body, municipal, state or otherwise.
Section 2. Series 2021 Bond Details; Delegation of Authority. (a) The Series 2021
Bonds shall mature on October 1 (or such other dates as specified in the Certificate of
Determination) of the years and in the principal amounts, and shall bear interest (calculated on the
basis of a year of 360 days consisting of twelve 30-day months) from the Closing Date, payable
semiannually on April 1 and October 1 (or such other dates as specified in the Certificate of
Determination) of each year, and at the rates per annum and commencing on the dates, all as
provided in that certain Certificate of Determination, a form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
C, of the Designated Officers (defined below) delivered pursuant to this Section 2, setting forth
certain terms and provisions of the Series 2021 Bonds (the “Certificate of Determination”).
(b) There is hereby delegated to the Designated Officers, subject to the limitations
contained in this resolution, the power to determine and effectuate the following with respect to
the Series 2021 Bonds and the Designated Officers are hereby authorized to make such
determinations and effectuations:
(i) the principal amount of each series of the Series 2021 Bonds necessary to
accomplish the purpose of the Series 2021 Bonds set forth in the recitals hereto and the
aggregate principal amount of each series of the Series 2021 Bonds to be executed and
delivered pursuant to the Indenture; provided that the aggregate principal amount of the
Series 2021 Bonds shall not exceed Fifty-eight Million Dollars ($58,000,000);
(ii) the maturity date or dates and principal amount of each maturity of the
Series 2021 Bonds to be issued; provided, however, that the Series 2021 Bonds mature
over a period of not to exceed twenty-two (22) years from their date or dates;
(iii) the interest rate or rates, which may be taxable or tax-exempt rates, of the
Series 2021 Bonds and the date on which payment of such interest commences, provided,
however, that the interest rate or rates to be borne by any Series 2021 Bond shall not exceed
__________ percent (____%) per annum;
(iv) the sale of the Series 2021 Bonds and the purchase price to be paid by the
Underwriter of such Series 2021 Bonds; provided, however, that the discount from par of
each series of the Series 2021 Bonds shall not exceed two percent (2.00%) (expressed as a
percentage of the principal amount);
- 4 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
(v) the Series 2021 Bonds, if any, to be retired from mandatory sinking fund
redemption payments and the dates and the amounts thereof;
(vi) the time and redemption price, if any, at which the Series 2021 Bonds may
be called for redemption prior to their maturity at the option of the City; provided, however,
the first optional redemption date shall not be later than ten and a half years from the date
of delivery of the Series 2021 Bonds;
(vii) the amount of reserves necessary to be maintained in connection with each
series of the Series 2021 Bonds, if any;
(viii) the use and deposit of the proceeds of the Series 2021 Bonds; and
(ix) any other provisions deemed advisable by the Designated Officers not
materially in conflict with the provisions of this resolution.
For purposes of this resolution and the Series 2021 Bonds, “Designated Officers” means
(a) the (i) Mayor of the City; or (ii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Mayor, the
Mayor’s Chief of Staff; or (iii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of both the Mayor and the
Mayor’s Chief of Staff, the City Treasurer; or (iv) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the
Mayor, the Mayor’s Chief of Staff and the City Treasurer, the Deputy Treasurer of the City and
(b) (i) the Chair of the City Council; or (ii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Chair
of the City Council, the Vice Chair of the City Council; or (iii) in the event of the absence or
incapacity of both the Chair and Vice Chair of the City Council, any other member of the City
Council.
Following the sale of the Series 2021 Bonds, the Designated Officers shall obtain such
information as they deem necessary to make such determinations as provided above and shall make
such determinations as provided above and shall execute the Certificate of Determination
containing such terms and provisions of such series of the Series 2021 Bonds, which execution
shall be conclusive evidence of the action or determination of the Designated Officers as to the
matters stated therein. The provisions of the Certificate of Determination shall be deemed to be
incorporated into this Section 2.
Section 3. Approval and Execution of the Supplemental Indenture. One or more
Supplemental Indentures, in substantially the form of the Thirteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture
attached hereto as Exhibit B, is hereby authorized and approved, and the Mayor is hereby
authorized, empowered and directed to execute and deliver each Supplemental Indenture on behalf
of the City, and the City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder is hereby authorized, empowered
and directed to affix to each Supplemental Indenture the seal of the City and to attest such seal and
countersign each such Supplemental Indenture, with such changes to each Supplemental Indenture
from the form attached hereto as are approved by the Mayor, her execution thereof to constitute
conclusive evidence of such approval. The provisions of each Supplemental Indenture, as
executed and delivered, are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this resolution. The Master
Indenture and the Supplemental Indenture shall constitute a “system of registration” for all
purposes of the Registered Public Obligations Act of Utah.
- 5 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
Section 4. Final Official Statement. A final Official Statement of the City in
substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement presented at this meeting and in the
form attached hereto as Exhibit D, is hereby authorized with such changes, omissions, insertions
and revisions as the Mayor shall deem advisable, including the completion thereof with the
information established at the time of the sale of any Series 2021 Bonds by the Designated Officers
and set forth in the Certificate of Determination. The Mayor shall sign and deliver a final Official
Statement for distribution to prospective purchasers of each series of the Series 2021 Bonds and
other interested persons. The approval of the Mayor of any such changes, omissions, insertions
and revisions shall be conclusively established by the Mayor’s execution of such final Official
Statement.
Section 5. Preliminary Official Statement to be Deemed Final. The use and distribution
of a Preliminary Official Statement, in substantially the form presented at this meeting and in the
form attached hereto as Exhibit D, is hereby authorized and approved, with such changes,
omissions, insertions and revisions as the Mayor and the City Treasurer, or the Deputy Treasurer
of the City (the “City Treasurer”), shall deem advisable. The Mayor and the City Treasurer are,
and each of them is, hereby authorized to do or perform all such acts and to execute all such
certificates, documents and other instruments as may be necessary or advisable to provide for the
issuance, sale and delivery of any Series 2021 Bonds and to deem final each Preliminary Official
Statement within the meaning and for purposes of paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 15c2-12 of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, subject to completion thereof with the information
established at the time of the sale of any Series 2021 Bonds.
Section 6. Other Certificates and Documents Required to Evidence Compliance with
Federal Tax and Securities Laws. Each of the Mayor, the City Recorder or any Deputy City
Recorder and the City Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to execute (a) such certificates
and documents as are required to evidence compliance with the federal laws relating to the tax-
exempt status of interest on any Series 2021 Bonds and (b) a Continuing Disclosure Agreement,
in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit E, and such other certificates and documents
as shall be necessary to comply with the requirements of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and other applicable federal securities laws.
Section 7. Other Actions With Respect to the Series 2021 Bonds. The officers and
employees of the City shall take all action necessary or reasonably required to carry out, give effect
to, and consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and shall take all action necessary in
conformity with the Act to carry out the issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds, including, without
limitation, the execution and delivery of any closing and other documents required to be delivered
in connection with the sale and delivery of the Series 2021 Bonds. If (a) the Mayor, (b) the City
Recorder or (c) the City Treasurer shall be unavailable or unable to execute or attest and
countersign, respectively, the Series 2021 Bonds or the other documents that they are hereby
authorized to execute, attest and countersign, the same may be executed, or attested and
countersigned, respectively, (i) by the Chief of Staff, (ii) by any Deputy City Recorder or (iii) by
the Deputy Treasurer of the City. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the officers
and employees of the City are authorized and directed to take such action as shall be necessary and
appropriate to issue the Series 2021 Bonds.
- 6 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
Section 8. Notice of Bonds to be Issued; Contest Period. In accordance with the
provisions of Section 11-14-316 of the Utah Code, the City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder
shall cause the Notice of Bonds, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit F, to be
published one time in The Salt Lake Tribune, a newspaper published and of general circulation
within the City.
For a period of thirty (30) days from and after publication of the Notice of Bonds, any
person in interest shall have the right to contest the legality of this resolution (including the
Supplemental Indenture attached hereto) or the Series 2021 Bonds hereby authorized or any
provisions made for the security and payment of the Series 2021 Bonds. After such time, no one
shall have any cause of action to contest the regularity, formality or legality of this resolution
(including the Supplemental Indenture) or the Series 2021 Bonds or any provisions made for the
security and payment of the Series 2021 Bonds for any cause.
Section 9. Public Hearing. In satisfaction of the requirements of Section 11-14-318 of
the Act, a public hearing shall be held by the Council on Tuesday, August 17, 2021, during the
Council meeting which begins at 7:00 p.m., which, as determined by the Council Chair, shall be
held either virtually, at the regular meeting place of the Council in the Council Chambers, Room
315 in the City and County Building, 451 South State Street, in Salt Lake City, Utah, or any
combination thereof, to receive input from the public with respect to the issuance by the City of
the Bonds and the potential economic impact that the Series 2021 Project will have on the private
sector.
Section 10. Publication of Notice of Public Hearing. The City Recorder or any Deputy
City Recorder (the “City Recorder”) shall publish or cause to be published the Notice of Public
Hearing on the Utah Public Notice Website, created under Section 63F-1-701 of the Utah Code,
no less than 14 days before the public hearing. The Notice of Public Hearing shall be in
substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit H.
Section 11. Form of Petition. The form of the petition to be used by registered voters in
requesting that an election be called to authorize the Series 2021 Bonds shall be in substantially
the form attached hereto as Exhibit I.
Section 12. Issuance of Bonds After Thirty-Day Period. In accordance with the
provisions of Section 11-14-307(7) of the Act, if within thirty days after the publication of the
Notice of Public Hearing by posting on the Utah Public Notice Website, a petition or petitions, in
the form specified by Section 11 hereof, are filed with the City Recorder, signed by not less than
twenty percent (20%) of the registered voters of the City (as certified by the County Clerk of Salt
Lake County) requesting that an election be called to authorize the Series 2021 Bonds, then the
Council shall proceed to call and hold an election on the Series 2021 Bonds. If such election is
held and a majority of the registered voters of the City voting thereon approve the Series 2021
Bonds, then, in accordance with the provisions of the Act, the City shall thereupon be authorized
to issue the Series 2021 Bonds. If no petition is filed within the thirty-day period after the date of
the final publication of such notice, or if it is determined that the number of signatures on the
petitions filed within the thirty-day period after the date of the final publication of such notice is
less than the required number, the City shall proceed to issue the the Series 2021 Bonds.
- 7 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
Section 13. Sale of the Series 2021 Bonds; Purchase Contract. The Series 2021 Bonds
authorized to be issued herein are hereby authorized to be sold and delivered to the Underwriter,
upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase Contract. The Mayor is hereby authorized,
empowered and directed to execute and deliver the Purchase Contract on behalf of the City in
substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit G, with such changes therein from the form
attached hereto as are approved by the Mayor, her execution thereof to constitute conclusive
evidence of such approval. The City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder is hereby authorized,
empowered and directed to affix to the Purchase Contract the seal of the City and to attest such
seal and countersign the Purchase Contract.
Section 14. City Recorder to Perform Certain Acts. The City Recorder is hereby directed
to maintain a copy of this Resolution (together with all exhibits hereto), a copy of the Master
Indenture and the form of the Supplemental Indenture on file in the City Recorder’s office (or the
City Recorder’s temporary office, as applicable) during regular business hours 1 for public
examination by registered voters of the City and other interested persons until at least thirty (30)
days from and after the date of publication of the Notice of Bonds and upon request to supply
copies of the form of petition specified in Section 11 hereof.
Section 15. Prior Acts Ratified, Approved and Confirmed. All acts of the officers and
employees of the City in connection with the issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds are hereby ratified,
approved and confirmed.
Section 16. Resolution Irrepealable. Following the execution and delivery of a
Supplemental Indenture, this resolution shall be and remain irrepealable until all of the Series 2021
Bonds and the interest thereon shall have been fully paid, cancelled, and discharged.
Section 17. Severability. If any section, paragraph, clause, or provision of this resolution
shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of
such section, paragraph, clause, or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of
this resolution.
Section 18. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon its
approval and adoption.
(Signature page follows.)
1 Appointments are encouraged as the temporary office is not occupied during business hours due to the COVID-19
pandemic.
- 8 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 13th day of July
2021.
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
_______________________________________
Chair
Salt Lake City Council
ATTEST:
____________________________________
City Recorder
[SEAL]
APPROVED:
By ____________________________________
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By ____________________________________
Senior City Attorney
A-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
EXHIBIT A
[ATTACH COPY OF MASTER TRUST INDENTURE]
B-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
EXHIBIT B
[ATTACH FORM OF THIRTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE]
C-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
EXHIBIT C
[ATTACH FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION]
D-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
EXHIBIT D
[ATTACH FORM OF PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT]
E-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
EXHIBIT E
[ATTACH FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT]
F-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
EXHIBIT F
NOTICE OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of Section 11-14-316, Utah Code
Annotated 1953, as amended, that on July 13, 2021, the City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake
City, Utah (the “City”), adopted a resolution (the “Resolution”) in which it authorized and
approved the issuance of its sales and excise tax revenue bonds in one or more series, on a taxable
or tax-exempt basis (collectively, the “Bonds”), in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed
$58,000,000, to bear interest at a rate or rates of not to exceed ____% per annum and to mature
not later than 22 years from their date or dates and to be sold at a discount from par not to exceed
2.00%. The Bonds shall be subject to such optional and mandatory redemption and other
provisions as are contained in the Master Trust Indenture, described below, and the final form of
the Bonds and a Supplemental Trust Indenture, described below.
Pursuant to the Resolution, the Bonds are to be issued for the purpose of paying all or part
of the cost of (a) (i) acquiring, constructing and improving [various City parks, trails, historic
structures, roads, streets, intersections and electrical facilities] and (ii) acquiring, constructing,
improving and remodeling various other capital improvement program projects; (b) funding any
necessary reserves and contingencies in connection with the Bonds and (c) paying all related costs
authorized by law. The Bonds are to be issued and sold by the City pursuant to the Resolution,
including as part of the Resolution a draft, in substantially final form, of a Supplemental Trust
Indenture, and a copy of the Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as heretofor
amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and Zions
Bancorporation, National Association, a trustee, that were before the Council and attached to the
Resolution at the time of the adoption of the Resolution. The City will cause one or more
Supplemental Trust Indentures to be executed and delivered in such form and with such changes
thereto as certain designated officers of the City shall approve, provided that the principal amount,
interest rate or rates, maturity and discount, if any, will not exceed the respective maximums
described above.
The repayment of the Bonds will be secured by a pledge of the legally available revenues
from: (a) Local Sales and Use Taxes received by the City pursuant to Title 59, Chapter 12, Part 2,
Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.04 of the Salt Lake City Code);
(b) Municipal Energy Sales and Use Taxes received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1,
Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.06 of the Salt Lake City
Code); (c) the franchise fees for energy and utilities received by the City pursuant to Title 10,
Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.06 of Salt Lake
City Code); (d) the Municipal Telecommunications License Tax revenues received by the City
pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 4, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to
Chapter 3.10 of Salt Lake City Code); (e) the franchise fees associated with public utilities received
by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected
pursuant to Chapter 17.16.070 of Salt Lake City Code); and (f) the franchise fees associated with
cable television received by the City pursuant to Salt Lake City Code Chapter 5.20 (collectively,
the “Pledged Taxes”).
F-2 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
The City currently has $102,490,000 par amount of bonds or notes currently outstanding
that are secured by the Pledged Taxes. More detailed information relating to the City’s outstanding
bonds can be found in the City’s most recent Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that is
available on the Office of the Utah State Auditor’s website (www.sao.state.ut.us).
Assuming a final maturity for the Bonds of approximately 21 years from the date hereof
and that the Bonds are issued in an aggregate principal amount of $__________ and are held until
maturity, based on the City’s currently expected financing structure and interest rates in effect
around the time of publication of this notice, the estimated total cost to the City of the proposed
Bonds is $__________.
A copy of the Resolution (including the draft of the Supplemental Trust Indenture and a
copy of the Master Indenture attached to the Resolution) may be examined by appointment at the
temporary office of the City Recorder located at Plaza 349, 349 South 200 East in Salt Lake City,
Utah, during regular business hours from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. To schedule an appointment
please call (801) 535-7671. Additionally, a protected, pdf copy of the Resolution may be requested
by sending an email to the City Recorder at SLCRecorder@slcgov.com. The Resolution shall be
so available for inspection for a period of at least thirty (30) days from and after the date of the
publication of this notice.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that pursuant to law for a period of thirty (30) days from and
after the date of the publication of this notice, any person in interest shall have the right to contest
the legality of the Resolution (including the Supplemental Trust Indenture attached thereto) of the
City or the Bonds authorized thereby or any provisions made for the security and payment of the
Bonds. After such time, no one shall have any cause of action to contest the regularity, formality
or legality of the Resolution, the Bonds or the provisions for their security or payment for any
cause.
DATED this 13th day of July, 2021.
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
By ____________________________________
City Recorder
[SEAL]
G-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
EXHIBIT G
[ATTACH FORM OF PURCHASE CONTRACT]
H-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
EXHIBIT H
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND INTENT TO ISSUE
SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on July 13, 2021, the City Council (the “Council”)
of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), adopted a resolution (the “Resolution”), calling for a public
hearing to receive input from the public with respect to the issuance of its Sales and Excise Tax
Revenue Bonds (the “Bonds”) to finance all or a portion of the cost of acquiring, constructing and
improving [various City parks, trails, historic structures, roads, streets, intersections and electrical
facilities] and acquiring, constructing, improving and remodeling various other capital
improvement program projects (collectively, the “Project”) and the potential economic impact
that the Project will have on the private sector, pursuant to the Local Government Bonding Act,
Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”).
PURPOSE FOR ISSUING BONDS
The City intends to issue the Bonds for the purpose of (1) financing all or a portion of the
costs of the Project, (2) funding any necessary reserves and contingencies in connection with the
Bonds, and (3) paying the costs incurred in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds.
MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE BONDS
The City intends to issue the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding Fifty-
eight Million Dollars ($58,000,000) to finance the Project. The Bonds may be issued with other
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds being issued for other purposes so the principal amount may
exceed the amount listed above to finance the costs of the Project.
SALES TAXES PROPOSED TO BE PLEDGED
The City proposes to pledge to the payment of the Bonds all of the legally available
revenues from: (a) Local Sales and Use Taxes received by the City pursuant to Title 59, Chapter
12, Part 2, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.04 of the Salt Lake
City Code); (b) Municipal Energy Sales and Use Taxes received by the City pursuant to Title 10,
Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.06 of the Salt
Lake City Code); (c) the franchise fees for energy and utilities received by the City pursuant to
Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.06 of
Salt Lake City Code); (d) the Municipal Telecommunications License Tax revenues received by
the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 4, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant
to Chapter 3.10 of Salt Lake City Code); (e) the franchise fees associated with public utilities
received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and
collected pursuant to Chapter 17.16.070 of Salt Lake City Code); and (f) the franchise fees
associated with cable television received by the City pursuant to Salt Lake City Code Chapter 5.20.
H-2 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
TIME, PLACE AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
The City will hold a public hearing during its City Council meeting which begins at
7:00 p.m. on August 17, 2021. The public hearing will be held either virtually, at the regular
meeting place of the Council in the Council Chambers, Room 315 in the City and County Building,
451 South State Street, in Salt Lake City, Utah, or any combination thereof, as determined by the
Chair of the City Council. All members of the public are invited to attend and participate in the
public hearing in the manner that will be described in the agenda for the meeting. Written
comments may be submitted to the City, to the attention of the City Recorder, prior to the public
hearing.
PURPOSE FOR HEARING
The purpose of the hearing is to receive input from the public with respect to the issuance
of the Bonds and the potential economic impact that the Project will have on the private sector.
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO FILE PETITION TO HOLD AN ELECTION
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that pursuant to Section 11-14-307(7), Utah Code, if within 30
calendar days of the publication of this notice on July __, 2021, by posting on the Utah Public
Notice Website, a written petition requesting an election and signed by at least twenty percent
(20%) of the registered voters of the City is filed with the City, then the City shall submit the
question of whether or not to issue the Bonds to the voters of the City for their approval or rejection.
If no written petition is filed or if fewer than 20% of the registered voters of the City sign
a written petition, in either case, within 30 calendar days of the posting of this notice on July __,
2021, the City may proceed to issue the Bonds without an election.
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
By ____________________________________
City Recorder
I-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
EXHIBIT I
PETITION
To: City Recorder
Salt Lake City, Utah
We, the undersigned citizens and registered voters of Salt Lake City, Utah, respectfully
request that an election be called by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, pursuant to the
provisions of Section 11-14-307(7), Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, to authorize the
issuance by Salt Lake City, Utah, of its Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, in a maximum
principal amount not exceeding $58,000,000, as to which notice of intention to issue was published
on July __, 2021, by posting on the Utah Public Notice Website, pursuant to the provisions of a
resolution passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on July 13, 2021, and each for himself or herself says: I have personally signed this
petition; I am a registered voter of Salt Lake City, Utah; my residence and post office address are
correctly written after my name:
I-2 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
WARNING
It is a felony for any one to sign any initiative or referendum petition with any other name
than one’s own, or knowingly to sign one’s name more than once for the same measure, or to sign
such petition when one knows that he or she is not a registered voter.
REGISTERED VOTER’S PRINTED
NAME (MUST BE LEGIBLE TO BE
COUNTED)
SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED
VOTER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE,
ZIP CODE
[The following certification shall appear on the reverse side of each page
[attached to the Petition containing the signature of voters]
I-3 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects)
STATE OF UTAH )
: ss.
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
I, _________________________, of _____________________, hereby certify that I am a
registered voter of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, that all the names which appear on this
sheet were signed by persons who professed to be the persons whose names appear thereon, and
each of them signed his or her name thereto in my presence, I believe that each has printed and
signed his or her name, and written his or her post office address and residence correctly, and that
each signer is a registered voter of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this _____ day of __________, 2021.
Notary Public (or other official title)
Signature:
Email:Garrett.Danielson@slcgov.com
ATTACHMENT 2 – Description for $3.4 Million Investment in Westside Parks
(was not included in Attachment 1 transmittal)
The $3.4 million listed in the bond proposal for Westside Parks will cover robust community
engagement, park design and construction of new improvements to Modesto, Poplar Grove
and Jackson Parks. Utilizing this funding for the Westside Parks is consistent with Strategy
W-1 of the Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan which states “Neighborhood parks
are designed and programmed to highlight the unique natural, historical, cultural and
economic identity of the surrounding area and community in which they are located.” The
policies that support this major strategy which will be included in the project scope include
data collection on park use and engagement, engaging the surrounding community in the
visioning of public spaces with particular emphasis on fostering engagement with under-
represented groups, and enhancing community pride and placemaking characteristics
within the parks. The overarching purpose of the funding is to create high-quality
experiences within these parks. As defined by the Urban Land Institutei, high-quality parks
are in excellent physical condition, are accessible to all potential users, provide positive
experiences and are relevant to the communities they serve, and are flexible to changing
circumstances. These are all standards that will be sustained in the development of this
project. Based on these qualities, the specific goals for the Westside Parks project are as
follows:
Improve west side parks so that they are in excellent physical condition. Evaluate the
condition of all assets to determine replacement or rehabilitation needs.
Improve circulation in the park and access to the park so that it is accessible to all
potential users. Create a circulation network in the park to encourage walking and
improve access to park amenities and the neighborhood.
Collaborate with the community to identify multiple uses and opportunities to a
wide variety of users. This may include new passive recreation areas or new active
recreation options.
Include placemaking elements that are relevant to the communities they serve and
accurately reflect the community character. This might include public art,
interpretive signage or the development of special use or gathering areas.
Improve the climate resilience of the landscape by reducing the amount of
underutilized turf and replace it with a regionally appropriate and biodiverse
planting composition and potential accompanying irrigation. Include more shade
trees and pollinator gardens.
Funding will specifically go towards hiring of a consultant for comprehensive public
engagement and design, and a contractor for construction of the project. Project scope
will be developed with public input and may need to be phased based on costs and
funding capacity.
$1.2 Million will make a significant and noticeable difference in the City’s wayfinding
signage. There will always be a need to add, change or modify existing signage.
$1,200,000:
$300,000 Community engagement, consultant Services (planning and design),
permits, engineering project management and fees, project contingency and other
soft costs
Approximately $120,000 will be allocated for consultant services, master planning
and design, to develop a wayfinding best practices document and plan. This plan will
build on the recently completed SLC Public Lands Signage Guidelines. The
wayfinding plan will create an easy to replicate approach for identifying key
locations for wayfinding signage and appropriate sign type. This document will
provide guidance on immediate implementation as well as planning for future
additions to the wayfinding system. The goal of the project is to connect people to
the green space resources in the city including public lands and other public
resources like libraries and recreation centers.
$900,000 Construction Budget
Approximately $900,000 is allocated for wayfinding signage construction and
installation. Signage will include, but not be limited to, wayfinding, directional, and
naming signs to be installed across all districts. 2020 costs for signs range from
$2,250 to $5,000. Using an average sign cost of $3,500, an estimated 250
(approximately 35 + signs per council district) will be installed as part of this
project. The estimated number of signs installed as part of this project are based on
historic costs, actual numbers may differ, due to unforeseen future cost increases.
This project will make a substantial improvement to the city wayfinding system that
is an ongoing effort as we continue to add to the public amenities in our City
environment.
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
BUDGET UPDATE
Learn more about funds spent at www.tinyurl.com/SLCBudgetFY21
AUGUST 17, 2021
Balancing Our Priorities
Funds Spent by Department
DEADLINE TO SPEND ONE-TIME ARPA FUNDS: DECEMBER 2024
Some ARPA-Eligible Spending Options
As suggested/asked by Council Members
1
Policy Questions
How much should we reserve for FY23?
Should we use ARPA for CIP/Bond to
preserve bond capacity/fund balance?
How do we balance one-time projects with
ongoing people and program expenses?
What are our unmet community needs?
What have we heard from the community?
*When will we revisit the $1.5 million
holding account from 10 ARPA-ineligible
administration funding requests?
1
2
3
4
5
6
3
FY23 Estimated
Funding Needs
$36 million
Ongoing expenses on
employees & programs
(e.g. police salaries, YouthCity,
10 new FTEs) and larger
revenue loss replacement
**Could be funded using other
sources; final amount TBD
2
General Fund Balance
Reimbursement
$3 million
$1 million
for small business loans
$2 million
for low-income senior
and veteran housing
Capital Improvement
Program (CIP)
$6+ million
Improve outdoor spaces
$500,000
to repair the Annex Building
(Odyssey House application #3)
Improve drainage on streets
4
Sales Tax
Bond
$5.2 million
Improve outdoor spaces
Holding account* (1.9%)
$1,583,500
FY23 estimated funding needs** (42.1%)
$36,000,000
Financial Overview
$85,411,572
$22,555,258
Total funds
Funds spent (26.4%)Funds remaining (71.7%)
50.7%
Revenue
Replacement
(General
Fund)
37.7%
Police
(Ocer
existing
salaries)
Apprenticeship Program
(Multiple Departments)
Community &
Neighborhoods
Economic
Development
Finance
Fire
4.4%
4%
1.5%
0.9%
0.8%
$61,272,814
Remainder (29.6%)
$25,272,814
Revenue Replacement for the General Fund
Police Ocer Salary Increases
Apprenticeship Program
Youth & Family COVID-19 Programming Continuation
Economic Development Sta (2 New FTEs)
Medical Response Team Expansion (4 New FTEs funded for 6 Months)
ARPA Grant Administrator (1 New FTE Sunsets with ARPA Funding)
ARPA Grant Manager (1 New FTE Sunsets with ARPA Funding)
Community & Neighborhoods Special Projects Assistant (1 New FTE)
Youth & Family Community & Program Manager (1 New FTE)
Economic Development Strategic Plan
Medical Response Team Equipment for Expansion
Total ARPA Funds Spent
98.7% spent on ongoing expenses
4% spent on 10 New FTEs
$11,432,646
$8,507,318
$1,000,000
$711,350
$290,000
$136,762
$101,020
$95,000
$93,829
$90,633
$50,000
$46,700
$22,555,258
$22,262,538
$807,244
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Arts Council Sta (3 FTEs), Operational Costs TBD
Associate Planners (3 FTEs)
Forest Preservation & Growth (1 FTE), Operational Costs TBD
Small Business Construction Mitigation Pilot Program
Transportation Right of Way Utilization Manager (1 FTE)
Business & Cultural Districts (1 FTE)
Forest Preservation & Growth Program Equipment & Supplies (one-time)
Business Analyst (1 FTE)
Tech Lake City
American Express Card Merchant Fees
Holding Account
78% of holding account proposed for 10 FTEs and merchant fees (ongoing expenses)
$350,000
$235,000
$219,000
$200,000
$160,000
$150,000
$95,000
$89,500
$45,000
$40,000
$1,583,500
$1,243,500
ARPA-Funded Projects
Holding Account Proposals
650 North Bridge Replacement (partially ARPA eligible)
Damaged from March 2020 earthquake. The Administration applied to UDOT for replacement funding.
200 South Reconstruction and Transit Complete Streets (15% eligible)
For drainage, curb, and gutter.
9-Line Asphalt Pump Track
Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathways (100% eligible)
Odyssey House (100% eligible)
Three Creeks West Bank Trailway (100% eligible)
Street Improvements (15% eligible)
For drainage, curb, and gutter. Total estimated cost - $3 million.
Poplar Grove Sportcourt (100% eligible)
900 South Reconstruction and Signal Improvements
For drainage, curb, and gutter.
Three Creeks West Bank New Park (100% eligible)
Downtown Green Loop (partially eligible)
All of project may not be entirely eligible in a qualified census tract
West Side Neighborhood Parks (partially eligible)
TBD until more details are available.
Public Lands Multilingual Wayfinding Signage (partially eligible)
TBD until more details are available.
ARPA-Eligible CIP & Bond Projects
CIP
Bond
$5,600,000
$1,800,000
$615,777
$510,000
$500,000
$484,146
$450,000
$433,333
$375,000
$150,736
$4,000,000
$1,200,000
$16,118,992
$10,918,992
$5,200,000
ARPA-Eligible CIP & Bond Projects
= ongoing expense
CIPBond
Attachment 4 - Qualified Census Tracts for 2021 from HUD
ATTACHMENT 5 – Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Council Requests from January 2019
1.Policy Goals and Metrics – Council Members requested high-level cost estimates for the City
to implement the below policy goals as well as any metrics. The Administration was invited to
recommend policy goals to the Council. Three cost estimates are included based on prior
discussions but may not represent the best currently available information. The table is intended
for discussion purposes and does not represent a comprehensive list of policy goals for Council
consideration.
Potential Policy Goals Potential Metrics High-level Cost
Estimate
Bring all facilities out of
deferred maintenance
Appropriations vs. funding
need identified in Public
Services’ Facilities Dashboard
that tracks each asset
$6.8 million
annually or $68
million over ten
years
Expand the City's urban trail
network with an emphasis on
East-West connections
Total paved/unpaved network
miles; number and funding
for improved trail features;
percentage of 9-Line
completed
$21 million for 9-
Line
implementation
Increase the overall condition
index of the City's street
network from poor to fair
Overall Condition Index
(OCI); pavement condition
survey every five years
$133 million cost
estimate (in addition
to existing funding
level)
Implement the Foothill Trails
Master Plan
Distance of improved trails
completed; number and
funding for improved
trailheads
$TBD
Advance the City's
sustainability goals through
building energy efficiency
upgrades
Energy savings; carbon
emission reductions $TBD
Focus on renewal and
maintenance projects over
creating new assets
Number, funding level and
ratio of renewed assets vs.
new assets
$TBD
2.Project Location Mapping – Council Members requested a map of all CFP projects. The idea
of multiple maps based on dollar value was discussed such as $50,000 - $999,999, $1 million - $5
million, and over $5 million.
3.Measure CFP to CIP Alignment – Council Members expressed support for annually
measuring the alignment of how many CIP Funding Log projects were previously listed in the CFP
and how many CIP projects receiving appropriations were previously listed in the CFP. A high
alignment would indicate the CFP is successfully identifying the City’s capital needs.
4.Council Adoption of CFP – The question arose if the Council should adopt the CFP each year
with the annual budget or potentially in the summer when reviewing project specific funding.
Does the Administration have a preference?
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 10/19/2021
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 10/19/2021
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 10/19/2021
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Art Design Advisory Board.
STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan
jessi.eagan@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Art Design Advisory Board.
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Angela Dean as a member of
the Art Design Advisory Board.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
October 19, 2021
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Fowler,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Art Design Advisory
Board.
Angela Dean - to be appointed for a three year term starting from the date of City Council advice
and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
WWW.COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE:November 16, 2021
RE: Temporary Land Use Regulation
Motion 1 –
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance enacting temporary zoning regulations authorizing a
temporary overflow homeless shelter use at approximately 1659 West North Temple Street, subject to a
restriction that the temporary certificate of occupancy is not issued until:
A perimeter fence around the building is completed; also
The security and operations plan has been submitted to the City
I further move the Salt Lake City Police Department work with other law enforcement agencies to
develop a collaborative plan to provide public safety services in the area surrounding the temporary
shelter.
I further move that, to the extent possible, the Administration utilize the resources of the Salt Lake City
Economic Development Department to work with businesses in the immediate area to help mitigate
the impact to them from the temporary shelter.
I further move the Council initiate a legislative action asking the Administration review and come back
with recommendations for prohibiting temporary shelters until other jurisdictions in Salt Lake County
permit them.
Motion 2 –
I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ____ of 2021
(An Ordinance Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations Authorizing
Temporary Overflow Homeless Shelter Use at 1659 West North Temple Street)
WHEREAS, Section 10-9a-504 of the Utah Code permits a municipality, without prior
consideration and recommendation from the municipality’s planning commission, to
enact a temporary land use regulation for any part or all of a municipality if the governing body
makes a finding of compelling countervailing public interest; and
WHEREAS, in late 2019 three new shelter sites funded significantly by the State of Utah
(the “three new shelters”) were open to provide a new dispersed model for providing sleeping
accommodations and resources for individuals experiencing homelessness; and
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City (“City”), Salt Lake County (“County”), the State of Utah
(“State”), and community organizations have worked cooperatively over the past five years to
address the rise in numbers of persons experiencing homelessness; and
WHEREAS, despite the efforts at various levels of government, the number of
individuals experiencing homelessness and the efforts to address the needs of those experiencing
homelessness has been compounded by the economic, humanitarian, and public health crisis
stemming from the global COVID-19 pandemic, the affordable housing crises, the ongoing
opioid epidemic, and other various rising social crises that create economic disparities; and
WHEREAS, homelessness is not an issue to be addressed only by those municipalities
where shelters are currently located; and
WHEREAS, the City is hopeful that other local governments in the Salt Lake Valley and
surrounding areas will acknowledge that all jurisdictions have an obligation to shelter those who
are experiencing homelessness and will do their part to achieve solutions to the challenges
presented by homelessness; and
WHEREAS, the City finds that it is critical for the State to increase funding for
mitigation of homelessness-related impacts and urges the State to do so, potentially from a
source other than the centralized mitigations funds; and
WHEREAS, assistance from other jurisdictions’ law enforcement agencies such as the
Utah Highway Patrol and the Salt Lake County Sheriff/Unified Police District to patrol the area
near the proposed temporary overflow homeless shelter would help to alleviate the burden on
Salt Lake City Police Department resources, in light of the issue’s regional significance; and
WHEREAS, before the effective date of this ordinance, the operator of the proposed
temporary overflow homeless shelter (“Operator”) located at 1659 West North Temple Street
(“Property”) will provide a commitment to the City that, by mid-March, Operator will forward a
plan to the appropriate State entities to request funding to shelter persons experiencing
homelessness during winter 2022 that does not include emergency overflow shelter in Salt Lake
City; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to ensuring that persons experiencing homelessness
have access to shelter during these winter months when cold temperatures are often extreme
during the night in the Salt Lake Valley; and
WHEREAS, exposure to extreme cold temperatures can cause death, and in the past has
caused deaths among unsheltered persons experiencing homelessness in Salt Lake City and other
nearby communities; and
WHEREAS, in order to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 among those experiencing
homelessness it is necessary to promote social distancing practices and avoid over concentrating
any one particular shelter location with those individuals experiencing homelessness; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to allow: for a period not to extend past April 15,
2022, overnight sleeping accommodations at 1659 West North Temple Street provided on an
emergency basis when additional shelter beds beyond those provided by the three new shelters is
necessary to provide shelter to individuals experiencing homelessness (a “temporary overflow
homeless shelter use”), subject to the provisions herein; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that authorizing additional space where a
temporary overflow homeless shelter use is allowed encourages and further promotes responsible
social distancing practices among the population experiencing homelessness, especially during
the winter months when individuals tend to remain indoors for the significant portions of each
day; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that protecting lives from the potentially
deadly consequences of severe winter weather and providing responsible socially distant housing
for the City’s unsheltered population during the pandemic constitutes a compelling,
countervailing public interest which justifies a temporary land use regulation; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council intends for this temporary ordinance to be
effective only during the 2021-2022 winter season and only until April 15, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages the State, County, public interest
groups, other cities, and community organizations to continue to work together with the City
to proactively address the causes and effects of the myriad of social, economic, humanitarian,
and public health crises that continue to increase the number of individuals experiencing
homelessness and compound the efforts to address the needs of those experiencing
homelessness; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages other cities in Utah to permit shelter
locations in their communities; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council understands the County, State, Service
Providers and other stakeholders are currently working on plan to identify potential locations in
Salt Lake Valley for a permanent overflow facility, Salt Lake City encourages stakeholder to
diligently work to have this plan be fully funded and implemented in time for next winter; and
WHEREAS, the Operator and Community Stakeholders have committed to applying for
funding to pay the additional costs the City will incur due to the increased police patrols that will
be needed in the area to maintain public safety; and
WHEREAS other governmental entities are being encouraged to provide support in the
form of funds or staffing to assist with public safety.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Finding of Compelling Countervailing Public Interest. Pursuant to Section
10-9a-504 of the Utah Code, the City Council finds that protecting lives from the potentially
deadly consequences of severe winter weather and providing safe, socially distant housing for
the City’s unsheltered population during the pandemic constitutes a compelling, countervailing
public interest sufficient to justify these temporary land use regulations.
SECTION 2. Location. These temporary land use regulations shall apply to the
property located at 1659 West North Temple Street which is currently operated as a motel.
SECTION 3. Uses Authorized. A temporary overflow homeless shelter use at the
location identified in Section 2 above is hereby authorized subject to the conditions listed in
Section 4.
SECTION 4. Conditions. The temporary use of the location for an overflow shelter is
authorized subject to the following:
a. The structure to be used for temporary overflow homeless shelter use shall
meet all building and fire code requirements for such use unless other
reasonable means or methods are approved, in writing, by the Fire Marshal
and/or the Chief Building Official. A decision on whether a plan for
alternative means and methods under this section provides sufficient
assurance for life safety protection shall be made in the sole discretion of the
Building Official and/or Fire Marshall and shall not be appealable.
b. The Provider will maintain a staff to client ratio of about 1 staff to 25 clients
during daily periods of peak activity, always ensuring compliance with
minimums set forth in state licensing code. Overflow operator will notify the
city when staffing levels may drop below approved ratios and provide plans to
maintain safety and security until levels can be regained. Security guards may
not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
c. The overnight occupancy, including supervisory staff, shall not exceed the
occupancy limits identified in a temporary certificate of occupancy issued by
the City, but in no case shall the number of overnight occupants exceed 250
individuals, excluding staff. In cases where, due to extreme weather and lack
of available beds in the emergency system, the Operator may increase the
number of sleeping accommodations in predetermined spaces in the facility
overnight up to the maximum occupancy allowed by the Fire Marshal.
Operator must report the use of additional spaces to Salt Lake City Mayor’s
Office, the Salt Lake City Council Office, and City’s Chief Building Official
within 24 hours of the Operator utilizing the additional sleeping
accommodations. Such temporary certificate of occupancy must be issued
prior to any overnight occupancy of the building.
d. Operator shall submit a security and operations plan that meets the
requirements set forth in Subsection 21A.36.350.A.2 of the Salt Lake City
Code. In addition to the requirements in that subsection, the security and
operations plan shall address the impacts of the proposed temporary overflow
homeless shelter for up to ¼ mile from the Property, and identify actions to
mitigate those impacts including, but not limited to:
i. Employing two to three security personnel 24 hours per day, 7 days
per week to regularly patrol the premises of the Property;
ii. Coordinating with law enforcement agencies to patrol public areas
within a ¼ mile radius of the facility;
iii. Documenting security patrols, which shall demonstrate an increase in
the current level of service; and
iv. Communicating with the Salt Lake City Police Department frequently
including coordinating with the SLCPD’s use of CompStat
information to ensure public nuisance issues are mitigated.
e. Operator shall obtain or prepare a CPTED review of the Property.
f. Operator shall obtain or prepare a fire structural review for long term
residents.
g. The temporary overflow homeless shelter shall ensure that fencing is installed
on the Property to provide controlled access to areas where patrons of the
temporary shelter will stay. Installed fencing may be up to 6 feet tall in all
areas of the Property during the period that this temporary land use is in
effect, but any fencing that exceeds allowable fence heights or otherwise do
not comply with the requirements set forth in Salt Lake City Code Section
21A.40.120 shall be removed on April 15, 2022.
h. The Operator shall require all patrons of the temporary overflow homeless
shelter to check in and check out and maintain an accurate log of those staying
at the facility.
i. The Operator shall require all visitors to patrons of the temporary overflow
homeless shelter to register with the main officer when entering and existing
the facility and are subject to possession being searched.
j. The Operator will provide two to three meals per day to residents of the
facility.
k. The Operator will provide onsite laundry services for clients of the facility.
l. The Operator will provide a shuttle to help transport clients to other services
and providers they need to visit.
m. Operator shall not receive a temporary certificate of occupancy until the
fencing described herein is installed and a security and operations plan
described above is approved in accordance with Salt Lake City Code Section
21A.36.350.
SECTION 5. Duration. This temporary zoning ordinance shall remain in effect until
April 15, 2022 unless earlier amended, modified, or repealed.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has
been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah
Code §10-3-713.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2021.
Published: ______________.
TLUR overflow shelter Ramada 11.16.2021
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: _________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney
Paul Nielson (Nov 16, 2021 19:13 MST)
Nov 16, 2021
TLUR overflow shelter Ramada 11.16.2021
Final Audit Report 2021-11-17
Created:2021-11-17
By:Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com)
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAoZwIGD1kczmNMCQGZWQt7bXPMrbJ4hQA
"TLUR overflow shelter Ramada 11.16.2021" History
Document created by Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com)
2021-11-17 - 2:10:56 AM GMT
Document emailed to Paul Nielson (paul.nielson@slcgov.com) for signature
2021-11-17 - 2:11:35 AM GMT
Email viewed by Paul Nielson (paul.nielson@slcgov.com)
2021-11-17 - 2:13:14 AM GMT
Document e-signed by Paul Nielson (paul.nielson@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2021-11-17 - 2:13:31 AM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2021-11-17 - 2:13:31 AM GMT
City Council Announcements
November 16, 2021
Information Needed By Staff
A. Reminder - Council School Board Leadership Meeting
The Council/School Board leadership is scheduled to meet on Friday, November 19, 2021.
Please let Council staff know if you have any topics you wish to have
on the agenda for leadership to discuss. Redistricting is a topic that
has been suggested by Council staff.