Loading...
02/15/2022 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FORMAL MEETING February 15,2022 Tuesday 7:00 PM Council Work Room 451 South State Street Room 326 Salt Lake City,UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Dan Dugan,Chair District 6 Darin Mano,Vice Chair District 5 Victoria Petro-Eschler District 1 Alejandro Puy District 2 Chris Wharton District 3 Ana Valdemoros District 4 Amy Fowler District 7 Generated:12:59:20 The Council has returned to a hybrid meeting approach.Hybrid Council meetings allow people to join online through Webex or in person at the City &County Building. Public Comments:The public can give comments to the Council during their 7 p.m.formal meetings online through Webex and in-person in Room 326 of the City and County Building.For more information,including Webex connection information,please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings.(A phone line will also be available for people whose only option is to call in.) What to Expect:The hybrid format allows in-person participation and remains mindful of existing COVID-19 protocols and gathering limits.A maximum of 24 people,including Council members and City staff,will be permitted in a meeting room.If the capacity has been reached in the primary meeting room,overflow space will be provided.Social distancing will be maintained. Per an executive order signed by Mayor Mendenhall,face coverings are required for vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals inside Salt Lake City facilities. Please note:Dates not identified in the FYI -Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Dan Dugan will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of March 23,2021; April 6,2021;January 4,2022;January 11,2022;and February 1,2022 as well as the formal meeting minutes of April 20,2021;June 8,2021;August 17,2021;and January 18,2022 as well as the minutes for the January 3,2022 Oath of Office Ceremony and the January 25,2022 Council retreat. 5.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing February as Black History Month in Salt Lake City. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document,for Fiscal Year 2021-22.Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets,including proposed project additions and modifications.The proposed amendment includes funding for new Arts Council employees,adding a second sergeant to the Special Victims Unit,and additional Emergency Rental Assistance Program funding from the Federal Government,among other items. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022;Tuesday,February 8,2022;and Tuesday, February 15,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). 2.Ordinance:Rezone and Master Plan Amendment for the Former Fire Station No.3 Property The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 1085 East Simpson Avenue,1095 East Simpson Avenue,1097 East Simpson Avenue,and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive to rezone those properties from PL (Public Lands) District to CSHBD1 (Sugar House Business District)and would amend the Sugar House Community Plan Future Land Use Map.The purpose for the proposal is to consolidate the subject properties with the property to the east for future development.Both properties are owned by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City.There is no development proposal associated with this request.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-01007 and PLNPCM2021-00914 FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). 3.Ordinance:Rezone at 1193 West California Avenue The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property located at approximately 1193 West California Avenue from R-1/7,000 (Single Family Residential District)to R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential District).If approved,the property owner intends to subdivide the property,remove the existing home and construct two new homes,potentially with attached ADUs.The owner anticipates retaining ownership of both properties.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-00709 FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). 4.Ordinance:Rezone at 2060 North 2200 West The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map pertaining to one parcel of property located at 2060 North 2200 West Street to rezone the property from AG-2 (Agricultural District) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing District).The amendment is to implement the master plan zoning and to accommodate future commercial land uses.No specific site development proposal has been submitted at this time.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-00575 FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.4 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document,for Fiscal Year 2021-22.Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets,including proposed project additions and modifications.This amendment includes potential funding related to the emergency winter overflow shelter,among other items.The Council adopted most items in this amendment at previous public meetings. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,November 9,2021;Tuesday,November 16,2021;Tuesday, December 7,2021;Tuesday,December 14,2021;and Tuesday,February 15,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,November 9,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,November 16,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,December 14,2021 and Tuesday,February 15,2022 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2.Comments to the City Council.(Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing,as well as on any other City business.Comments are limited to two minutes.) E.NEW BUSINESS: NONE. F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Ordinance:Accessibility and Disability Commission The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Section 2.07.020,Section 10.02.040,Section 10.02.110 and enact chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission.The proposed changes would formalize the Commission,recognizing its important advisory role in improving and enhancing accessibility for community members experiencing a disability through a practice,systematic,and solution-based approach. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 15,2022 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). G.CONSENT: 1.One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant & Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will set the date of March 1,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public comment and consider a resolution adopting the Mayor’s funding recommendations and an appropriations resolution that would adopt the One-Year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2022-23.The plan includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)funding,HOME Investment Partnership Program funding,Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)funding,Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)funding.The resolution would approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 8,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 15,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 1,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation -Set date. 2.Ordinance:Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 1583 East Stratford Avenue The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 1,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property located at approximately 1583 East Stratford Avenue from RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District)to CN (Neighborhood Commercial District)and would amend the Sugar House Master Plan Future Land Use Map.No specific site development proposal has been submitted at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.Petition No.:PLNPCM2020-00393 and 00394 FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 15,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 15,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 1,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Staff Recommendation -Set date. 3.Board Appointment:Public Utilities Advisory Committee (PUAC): Alexander Lovell The Council will consider approving the appointment of Alexander Lovell to the PUAC for a term ending January 19,2026. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 15,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 15,2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 4.Board Appointment:Public Utilities Advisory Committee (PUAC): Kathryn Floor The Council will consider approving the appointment of Kathryn Floor to the PUAC for a term ending January 19,2026. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 15,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 15,2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 5.Board Reappointment:Parks,Natural Lands,Trails,and Urban Forestry (PNUT)Board –Jenny Hewson The Council will consider the reappointment of Jenny Hewson to the Parks, Natural Lands,Trails,and Urban Forestry Advisory (PNUT)Board for a term extending through February 15,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 15,2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 6.Board Reappointment:Parks,Natural Lands,Trails,and Urban Forestry (PNUT)Board –Samantha Finch The Council will consider the reappointment of Samantha Finch to the Parks, Natural Lands,Trails,and Urban Forestry Advisory (PNUT)Board for a term extending through February 15,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 15,2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. H.ADJOURNMENT: CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 5:00 p.m.on _____________________,the undersigned,duly appointed City Recorder,does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1)posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701,and (2)a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. CINDY LOU TRISHMAN SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda,including but not limited to adoption,rejection,amendment,addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City &County Building is an accessible facility.People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation,which may include alternate formats,interpreters,and other auxiliary aids and services.Please make requests at least two business days in advance.To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com,801-535-7600,or relay service 711. PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Work Session on Tuesday,March 23,2021 in an Electronic Meeting,pursuant to the Chair’s determination and Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b). The following Council Members were present: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,James Rogers Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Cindy Lou Trishman –Clerk,Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Allison Parks –Public Policy Analyst, Ben Luedtke –Senior Public Policy Analyst,Kira Luke –Policy Analyst/Public Engagement,Robert Nutzman –Administrative Assistant,Russell Weeks –Senior Advisor,Blake Thomas –Community &Neighborhoods Director,Lorna Vogt –Public Services Director,Keith Reynolds –Deputy City Recorder,Tony Milner –Housing &Neighborhood Development Policy &Program Manager,Nick Norris –Director of Planning ,David Salazar –Human Resource Program Manager II,Paul Nielson –Senior City Attorney Council Member Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 pm Work Session items MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 1 1.Informational:Updates from the Administration ~4:00 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive an update from the Administration on major items or projects, including but not limited to: •COVID-19,the March 2020 Earthquake,and the September 2020 Windstorm; •Updates on relieving the condition of people experiencing homelessness; •Police Department work,projects,and staffing,etc.;and •Other projects or updates. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Mayor Mendenhall reviewed the COVID-19 statistics,vaccination locations,operation times and dates,reported on the Rio Grande and Fleet Block regarding housing,camping,and crime affecting individuals experiencing homelessness. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 2 2.Informational:Updates on Racial Equity and Policing ~4:30 p.m. 10 min. The Council will hold a discussion about recent efforts on various projects City staff are working on related to racial equity and policing in the City.The conversation may include issues of community concern about race,equity,and justice in relation to law enforcement policies,procedures,budget,and ordinances.Discussion may include: •An update or report on the Commission on Racial Equity in Policing;and •Other project updates or discussion. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Kira Luke stated the Police Budget Audit would be available in early April 2021 and the Racial Equity and Policing Commission’s next meeting would be held March 24,2021,at 5:00 PM. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 3 3.Ordinance:Shared Housing Zoning Text Amendments Follow-up Briefing (formerly Single Room Occupancy or SROs)~4:40 p.m. 40 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about a new proposal for Shared Housing zoning text amendments.The proposed amendments would redefine what was previously Single Room Occupancy (SRO)housing to Shared Housing,and defines it as a residential building,or part of one that contains smaller housing units consisting of one or more sleeping rooms and contains either a private kitchen or private bathroom,but not both.In the updated proposal,units could contain multiple sleeping rooms,rather than limiting the unit to one sleeping room. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 14,2020;Tuesday,October 6,2020;and Tuesday,March 23,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,October 6,2020 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,October 20,2020 and Tuesday,November 10, 2020 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Minutes: Russell Weeks presented the Shared Housing Zoning Text Amendments Ordinance. Council Member Johnston asked how regulations differed between motels versus shared housing.Nick Norris stated the difference was the amenities offered. Council Member Johnston expressed concerns on the impact to communities by shared housing and the activities that resulted in the neighborhoods from these facilities. Mr.Norris stated zoning was not a great tool to regulate behavior that happened outside of the use;reviewed how activities were regulated with zoning such as management plans that bars were required to provide.He stated it was important to note the establishments could discuss the issues with the neighborhood and help solve any issues that might arise. Council Member Fowler asked how the role of a property manager could help address issues surrounding homeless shelters. Cindy Gust-Jenson stated the Council had tried to regulate activities around facilities and asked if there was a clause in the Bar Management Plan that required property clean up, regulations for smoking,zoning regulations for sororities and fraternities in terms of noise and trash. Mr.Norris reviewed the typical language in a bar’s management plan and noted a designated area for smoking was required for all establishments. Council Members Mano and Valdemoros expressed the need to clarify how enforcement would be implemented,24 hour management was a must,and the need to spread the facilities throughout the City (not in just one area). Council Members Fowler,Rogers,and Wharton stated single family homes could create the MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 4 same issues;needing to change the narrative about creating housing,shared housing was a solution for people unable or unwilling to be in a shelter,diversity in housing was greatly needed in the City,the conversation was similar to the concerns over Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)zoning which helped housing diversity,and shared housing was a way to help unhoused people and if nothing changed the problem would persist. Council Members discussed the need to expand the ordinance throughout the City,how to ensure one area was not inundated with this type of housing,the timeline for approving, reviewing and changing the proposed ordinance including business licensing, Mayor Mendenhall spoke in favor of approving the ordinance and also wanted it expanded. Russell Weeks suggested measurements be required for the ordinance to study the impacts the zoning would have on a neighborhood. Paul Nielsen reviewed the approval process for the ordinance. Council Members discussed the approval process,whether to “sunset”of “soft set”the ordinance,what each option would require and when to expand the locations for the zoning. Mr.Weeks stated the Council could adopt the ordinance and included the following: Management Plan,Yearly Review,expand the geographic equity,buffer zone (one per X number of feet),and business license enforcement. 4.Ordinance*:Zoning Text Amendment to Increase Building Height Limits in a Portion of the G-MU Zone Follow-up ~5:20 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about a request to increase the building heights within a portion of the G-MU (Gateway Mixed Use)zoning district from a current maximum of 120 feet up to 190 feet across portions of two separate blocks located between 500 West Street and the railroad tracks west of UTA’s Salt Lake Central Station (approximately 625 West)and 200 South and 400 South.The applicant is requesting the change for a specific area and is not seeking to alter height limits across the entirety of the GMU zone. *The Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation,therefore an ordinance was not drafted with the original transmittal but has since been added for the Council's formal consideration. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 14,2020;Tuesday,April 21,2020;Tuesday,August 11,2020; Tuesday,October 20,2020;and Tuesday,March 23,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,August 11,2020 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,September 1,2020 and Tuesday,September 15, 2020 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Minutes: Russell Weeks presented the Zoning Text Amendment to Increase Building Height Limits in MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 5 a portion of the G-MU Zone Ordinance,reviewed the area being discussed and explained the developers had asked for an increased height limit in the undeveloped area. Council Members Mano and Johnston expressed interest in all of the options presented,both wanted affordable housing in the development and questioned the negative recommendation from the Planning Commission. Council Member Rogers stated the project was not looking at affordable housing and posed questions about how to incentivize it,expressed his comfort moving forward and the length of time the petition had been under review. Andrew Bybee (Petitioner)stated the development was for office space,not housing and addressed the Planning Commission’s recommendation. 5.Ordinance:Amending Chapter 2.30 of the Salt Lake City Code (Percent for Art Ordinance Revision)Follow-up ~5:50 p.m. 10 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about an ordinance amendment that would increase the ongoing annual Capital Improvement Program (CIP)funding minimum for art from 1%to 1.5%.The proposal would also create a public art maintenance fund and adjust the Art Design Board powers and membership limits. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 19,2021 and Tuesday,March 23,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 6,2021 Minutes: Ben Luedtke presented the Percent for Art Ordinance Revision and its required funding. Allison Parks clarified the ordinance would become effective except the reporting requirement would be delayed. No discussion was held. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 6 6.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.7 for Fiscal Year 2020-21 Follow- up ~6:00 p.m. 25 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about Budget Amendment No.7 for the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget.Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets,including proposed project additions and modifications.The proposed amendment includes $6 million from the U.S.Treasury Department for rental assistance,funding to host the National League of Cities Conference in November 2021,and an outdoor business activity assistance pilot program,among many other items. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 16,2021 and Tuesday,March 23,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,March 16,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 6,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Minutes: Ben Luedke reviewed Budget Amendment No.7 for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Council Members and Staff discussed the funding from the American Rescue Act (ARA),the condition of the boiler that heats the Library and the City and County Buildings,funding for the boiler repair,and projects that would not be completed due to the necessary repairs. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 7 Council Member Mano asked how the delayed projects would be addressed and how funding would be provided to accommodate improvements. Lorna Vogt reviewed the process of ensuring building maintenance was adequately addressed and how large unexpected repairs were funded. Council Member Johnston asked about the ARA funding and what was eligible for the funding.Ms.Vogt stated the City was researching the use of the ARA funds. A Straw Poll to approve the funding for the boiler was supported by all present Council Members. 7.Dinner Break ~6:25 p.m. 30 min. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 8.Informational:Citizens’Compensation Advisory Committee 2021 Annual Report ~6:55 p.m. 30 min. The Council will be briefed by the Citizens’Compensation Advisory Committee to review the 2021 Annual Report.The report includes information and recommendations pertaining to the compensation levels of the City's employees,pay equity,and turnover data,and is presented for consideration each year prior to the City's budget review process. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 23,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: David Salazar presented the Citizens’Compensation Advisory Committee 2021 Annual Report,introduced Kimberly Taylor to present the reports. Kimberly Taylor (Pay Scale,consultant),reviewed the pay equity audit. Council Member Fowler asked if any Salt Lake City policies should be reviewed to prevent further inequity.Ms.Taylor stated Salt Lake City was doing very well and did not need to change any policies at this time. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 8 Council Member Johnston asked about the four dollar and hour discrepancies,how the gap could be lessened and the cost to lessen the gap.Ms.Taylor reviewed the three employees flagged within the report and how the gap could be lessened. Council Member Mano asked if the report showed if employees were being over paid or just under paid.Ms.Taylor stated the analysis was to review the wage similarity across the City and the law regulating wage decreases and increases. Mayor Mendenhall thanked Kimberly for her work and the knowledge she gave to the City’s Human Resource team. Jeff Worthington (Chair of the Citizens’Compensation Committee)reported on the impact of COVID-19 on salary budgets,labor and recruitment adjustments. Marlene Sloan (Citizens’Compensation Committee)reported on the city living wage and local market pay comparison. 9.One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant &Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2021-22 ~7:25 p.m. 45 min. The Council will be briefed about the Mayor’s funding recommendations and an appropriations resolution that would adopt the One-Year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2021-22.The plan includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)funding,HOME Investment Partnership Program funding,Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)funding,Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)funding.The resolution would approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 23,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,March 16,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 6,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Minutes: Ben Luedtke reviewed the One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant and Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Blake Thomas gave an overview of funding and available grant programs. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 9 Tony Milner discussed the use of the $6.7 million for the HUD program. Council Member Johnston asked for information regarding the CDBG funding discrepancies between the Redevelopment Agency Board and the Mayor.Mr.Milner stated it was CDBG funds that were unspent in previous years and needed to be allocated to similar projects,the Board assigns some of the funds and the Mayor the other portion.The remaining funds are what was recommended to be allocated to the Assist program. Council Member Valdemoros asked about the double application for the Geraldine King Resource Center and if both requests would be funded.Mr.Milner reviewed the process for allocating funds,the Geraldine King Resource Center and what funding they were recommended to receive. Council Member Mano asked about the score for the Journey of Hope application .Mr.Milner reviewed the request from Journey of Hope and reasoning for the low score they received. Council Member Fowler asked for clarification on where ARA funding could be allocated.Mayor Mendenhall reviewed the ARA funding guidelines. Standing Items 10.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. Minutes: Item not held. 11.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director Report of the Executive Director,including a review of Council information items and announcements.The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business,including but not limited to; •Ranked Choice Voting;and •Scheduling Items. Minutes: Cindy Gust-Jenson updated the Council on Ranked Choice Voting. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 10 12.Tentative Closed Session The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session.A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including,but not limited to: a.discussion of the character,professional competence,or physical or mental health of an individual; b.strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase,exchange,or lease of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if public discussion of the transaction would: (i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration;or (ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if: (i)public discussion of the transaction would: (A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration;or (B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale;and (iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 11 f.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel,devices,or systems;and g.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code §78B-1-137,and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Minutes: Item not held. Meeting adjourned at 9:00 pm Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 12 This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday,March 23,2021. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,March 23,2021 13 PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Work Session on Tuesday,April 6,2021 in an Electronic Meeting,pursuant to the Chair’s determination and Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b). The following Council Members were present: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,James Rogers Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Cindy Lou Trishman –Salt Lake City Recorder,Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Amanda Lau –Public Engagement &Communication Specialist,Ben Luedtke –Senior Public Policy Analyst,Brian Fullmer –Constituent Liaison,Policy Analyst,Robert Nutzman –Administrative Assistant,Sam Owen –Public Policy Analyst,DeeDee Robinson –Deputy City Recorder,Chief Mike Brown –Police Chief, Tony Milner –Housing &Neighborhood Development Policy &Program Manager,Lauren Shafer –Assistant City Recorder,Debbie Lyons –Sustainability Director,Jennifer Schumann –CED,HAND, Nick Norris –Planning Director,Aaron Barlow –Principal Planner,Paul Nielson –Senior City Attorney,Wayne Mills –Planning Manager,Anna Anglin –Principal Planner Council Member Amy Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 2:07 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 1 Work Session Items 1.Informational:Updates from the Administration ~2:00 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive an update from the Administration on major items or projects,including but not limited to: •COVID-19,the March 2020 Earthquake,and the September 2020 Windstorm; •Updates on relieving the condition of people experiencing homelessness; •Police Department work,projects,and staffing,etc.;and •Other projects or updates. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Mayor Mendenhall reviewed the COVID-19 mask mandate discontinuing on April 10,2021, COVID-19 statistics for Salt Lake City/County,vaccination data,locations and availability;Community Connection Program Update that provided court services,vaccines,and other services to the homeless population;reviewed the expansion of the Downtown Ambassador program extended along the North Temple corridor and the success of the Police Bike Squad. Chief Mike Brown provided an update on the program and the role of the Police Department,identifying their role as safety and security for everyone;reviewed homeless camp abatements,and providing adequate notice with the Health Department. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 2 2.Informational:Updates on Racial Equity and Policing ~2:30 p.m. 20 min. The Council will hold a discussion about recent efforts on various projects City staff are working on related to racial equity and policing in the City.The conversation may include issues of community concern about race,equity,and justice in relation to law enforcement policies, procedures,budget,and ordinances.Discussion may include: •An update or report on the Commission on Racial Equity in Policing; ◦a presentation of recommendations from the School Safety Subcommittee;and, •Other project updates or discussion. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Allison Rowland introduced the Commission Members and the recommendations provided by the School Safety Subcommittee. Nicole Salazar-Hall (Racial Equity in Policing Commission Member)and Moises Prospero (Racial Equity in Policing Commission Member)presented the recommendations from the subcommittee,noting:significant reform with the juvenile justice system because of the involvement of Salt Lake City Police;reviewed citation statistics,and the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between the City and the School District.They stated the goal of the Commission was to keep kids out of the school to prison pipeline by identifying at risk individuals,providing services with intense case management,following through and building success for these individuals with support from the Promising Youth Program (Ashley Fletcher,inside the Police Department).They discussed the issue of space in the Public Safety Building for the program,potential issues with the program being under the Police Department and asked the Council to consider moving the program under the City umbrella outside of the SLCPD.They reviewed the summer program,Promising Youth,that helped build relationships with high-risk youth,providing outside youth programs and continuing the relationship building efforts to make progress. Ms.Salazar-Hall reviewed the Commission’s recommendation for a full-time City employee who will act as a liaison between the SLCPD,School District,and the Senior Advisor of Education to contribute to information sharing,building relationships,ensuring funding and students were being served adequately.The full-time employee could fulfill the role to meet quarterly or monthly,meet goals in the oversight commission meetings,increase information outlining the School Resource Officer program with measurable goals of the MOU;comprehension and understanding of the purpose of the program and to confirm whether it was helping,harming,or doing nothing for students. Council Member Valdemoros inquired if there were scholarships or apprenticeship programs that were being developed for those graduating high school,giving the students something to MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 3 look forward to.Mr.Prospero stated that had not been addressed but would be a great option. Council Member Wharton inquired what office the full-time employee would work under. Commissioner Salazar-Hall responded it could be best housed in the Mayor’s office. Rogelio Romero Paredes (Racial Equity in Policing Commission Member)reviewed the Peer Court Program that helped keep youth out of the system. Council Member Johnston inquired about the metrics for the School Resource Officer,the citation count,and whether there was an outline to measure success of the program.Siobhan Locke (Racial Equity in Policing Commission Facilitator,Langdon Group)stated the metrics was a work in progress.Council Member Johnston asked about the proposed budget for peer court.Mr.Prospero reviewed the current employees for the program and the number of kids that used the program. Mayor Mendenhall stated the Mayor’s Office would research funding for the Peer Court program. Ms.Rowland stated the Commission was not asked to provided budget requests. Mr.Prospero stated connecting the peer court and Promising Youth programs was a valuable idea. Council Member Dugan inquired if Highland and West High Schools participated in the peer court program and if the individuals on the court rotated roles.Commissioner Romero reviewed the students involved in the program and their roles,explained the program began at West High,and was intended to be throughout Salt Lake City. Council Member Dugan questioned the number School Resource Officers during the year and how many would continue with the program through the summer.Mr.Prospero reviewed the number of School Resource Officers currently working in the schools and the preferred number of officers to work in the program as schools reopened. Ben Luedtke provided an update on the Police Audit that was tentatively scheduled for a briefing on April 20,2021. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 4 3.Informational:Ranked Choice Voting Overview and Pilot Project Follow- up ~2:50 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about an option to participate in the State- authorized Municipal Alternative Voting Method Pilot Program project,otherwise known as single-winner ranked-choice voting or instant runoff voting.Discussion will include how the ranked-choice voting process works,how the elections would be conducted,relevant bills in the Legislature’s 2021 General Session and public education efforts. Under ranked choice voting,voters rank the candidates in order of preference.Election equipment tabulates the preference numbers for each ballot.If none of the candidates receive more than 50%of the overall vote after the first round of tabulation,the candidate with the least number of votes is eliminated.The voters who had selected the eliminated candidate as their first choice would then have their votes tabulated for their second-choice candidate.This process of elimination continues until a candidate crosses the 50%threshold and is declared the winner. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021 and Tuesday,April 6,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Ben Luedtke presented the report on Ranked Choice Voting (RCV)and its associated costs. Cindy Lou Trishman reviewed the deadlines for publishing in local newspapers. Lauren Shafer reviewed the materials that would be provided by the Lieutenant Governor’s Office and the data from other cities regarding candidate spending with or without a primary election. Council Members and Staff discussed if a primary election was or was not necessary with RCV, voter education,funding for voter education and multiple page balloting,cost for RCV,fiscal impacts to candidates with or without a primary,funding from the Lieutenant Governor’s Office, the importance of Salt Lake City being a leader to roll out RCV,and if Council Members seeking re-election should or should not be involved in the decision. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 5 4.Ordinance:Idling of Vehicles Ordinance Amendments ~3:20 p.m. 20 min. The Council will be briefed about an ordinance that would amend a section of the Salt Lake City Code related to idling of vehicles,penalty amendments,and exemption amendments.The proposed changes include updated language for idling restriction exceptions,such as during extreme temperatures,operation of equipment in emergency and law enforcement vehicles,or stopped for traffic control devices.The proposed update would also allow the City to issue a citation after only one warning. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 6,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Samuel Owen presented the Idling of Vehicles Ordinance Amendments. Debbie Lyons reviewed the warning and citation statistics for the Ordinance,stated idling was harmful to the health and safety of the City and its residents,was against the law,and the amendments would bring the language inline with what was practiced across the valley. Council Members and Staff discussed language being removed or added to the ordinance,the intent of the ordinance,and if it was enforceable. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 6 5.One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant &Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2021-22 Follow-up ~3:40 p.m. 45 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about the Mayor’s funding recommendations and an appropriations resolution that would adopt the One-year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2021-22.The plan includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)funding,HOME Investment Partnership Program funding,Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)funding,Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)funding.The resolution would approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 23,2021 and Tuesday,April 6,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,March 16,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 6,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Minutes: Council Member Fowler reviewed the One-Year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant &Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2021-22,the timeline for discussion and approval. Ben Luedtke reminded the Council that the Public Services portion of CDBG was limited to 15%of the total CDBG award. Council Member Valdemoros spoke regarding the application for Utah AIDS Foundation regarding housing for people with AIDS and the recommendation to fund health services for those individuals. Tony Milner stated the mental health application was new,reviewed the Housing Authority’s rent assistance program and how taking money from the housing fund might be detrimental to the overall program. Council Member Fowler sought clarification on how decreasing funds for the Housing Authority programs would effect the program and if funds could be supplemented from elsewhere. Jennifer Schumann stated there were no additional funds,that have not already been allocated,to grant to the Aids Foundation. Council and Staff discussed the different areas funding may be available,the grant requests,and if other programs could help with funding mental health services for people with AIDS. Council Member Johnston inquired about the Public Services request in Section 18 &20 for the Miller Resource and Gale A.King Resource Center funding,what was the reasoning for the result in funding for these entities differently.Mr.Milner reviewed the history of grant funding for the two resource centers and what lead to the final determination for allocating the different funding amounts to the two programs. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 7 Council Member Johnston asked for further clarification on the application scoring and if any other mitigating factor played a part in the decision.This would help the Council understand the reasoning behind the decision for allocating funding differently for each program. Council Member Dugan stated there were some areas that were not being funded that greatly impacted the community such as homeless services and inquired if the Council would be willing to redirect some of the money granted to other programs to these services. Council and Staff discussed the impacts to funding one program versus the other,what would happen if funding was decreased or re-allocated to other areas,and reviewed the allocation process. Council Member Fowler asked about the Homeless Youth Resource Center security remodel and upgrades application and if there was a way to teach the applicants about the process,in order for them to obtain funding in the future. Mr.Milner stated the request did not fit in the consolidated plan at this time therefore it was not funded. Council Member Valdemoros asked the difference between the Small Repair program and the Housing rehab program.Ms.Shumann reviewed the difference in the projects and the cost of the repairs each program offered. 6.Tentative Break ~4:25 p.m. 20 min. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 8 7.Informational:Accessory Dwelling Unit Annual Report ~4:45 p.m. 15 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)annual report.The report is required to include the number of applications received,the address of each unit for which an application was submitted,an explanation of why an application was denied,and a map showing approved accessory dwelling units.This report covers the time period from October 2018 to December 31,2020.The report is required by ordinance to be transmitted to the City Council by February 15,2021. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 6,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Nick Norris presented the Accessory Dwelling Unit Annual Report. Council Member Wharton questioned the affect Conditional Use approval had on ADUs.Mr. Norris reviewed the cost,time frame,and impacts of the Conditional Use Ordinance on ADUs. Council Member Johnston inquired how owner occupancy was verified.Mr.Norris reviewed the registration for ADU,clarified that most ADUs were rented by family members,and enforcement addressed if the units were zoning compliant and verified occupancy at that time. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 9 Council Member Johnston asked for an update on the incentive programs for ADUs.Jennifer Bruno stated that information would be in the Redevelopment Agency (RDA)report. Council Member Johnston stated he favored the recommendations and would suggest adding the policies to future ordinances with regard to housing. Council Member Mano agreed with the favorable recommendation however,square footage needed to be addressed to offer adequate housing. Council Member Wharton discussed areas of the City that could allow for ADUs to be constructed. Council Member Fowler stated the hesitation could also be due to the district not wanting to add ADUs,and not due to lack of space. Council Member Valdemoros stated that she was concerned with accessibility for this program in regard to those who might not be able to afford specialists to help walk them through this process,and there would need to be a way of opening it up to those households. Council discussed where ADUs could be constructed due to density,what was driving/deterring the development of ADUs,and how AirBnBs were enforced with ADUs. 8.Ordinance:Learned Alley Vacation (1025 West North Temple and 1022, 1028,1030,and 1032 West Learned Avenue)~5:00 p.m. 20 min. The Council will be briefed about an ordinance that would vacate a City-owned alley adjacent to properties at 1025 West North Temple and 1022,1028,1030 and 1032 West Learned Avenue.The applicant petitioned to vacate the 180-foot long section of public alley to consolidate the properties immediately abutting the alley.If approved,the applicant plans to consolidate the lots adjacent to the alley and construct a multi-family residential structure.The proposed project would still need to meet relevant zoning requirements and the applicant would need to submit a separate petition.The closure will not impact traffic or access. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 6,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 6,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,May 18,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 1,2021 Minutes: Brian Fullmer presented the Learned Alley Vacation at 1025 West North Temple and 1022, 1028,1030,and 1032 West Learned Avenue. Aaron Barlow spoke to the Planning Commissions recommendations,the benefit of the alley vacation and the future use of the surrounding homes for affordable housing. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 10 Council Member Mano asked about the legality of making an alley vacation contingent on a future petition.Paul Nielson stated the condition,recommended by the Planning Commission, was possible to add to the approval of this petition. Cindy Gust-Jenson stated the alley vacation was a discretionary determination by the Council. Riley Rogers (applicant)gave a presentation on the alley,said it was used by the neighboring restaurant and homes as parking and entry to their respective properties.He reviewed the relocation practices used for the residences of the homes. Jarod Hall (project architect)reviewed the benefits of the proposal for the City,and the proposed development for the property. Wayne Mills stated conditions had been placed on alley vacations in the past but not to the nature of the Planning Commission’s recommendation. Council discussed the process to add the condition for affordable housing to the alley vacation,if it was something the applicant was willing to add to the development,and if it was something that would halt this petition. Mr.Rogers stated the development was not designed with affordable housing units but would like to incorporate affordable housing into his future projects. 9.Ordinance:Fern Subdivision Alley Vacation ~5:20 p.m. 20 min. The Council will be briefed about a proposal that would vacate a City-owned alley known as the Fern Subdivision Alley located between 1000 East and 1100 East and between Wood Avenue and Logan Avenue.The east-west portion of the alley runs behind eight homes between 1019 East and 1053 East Logan Avenue. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 6,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 6,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,May 18,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 1,2021 Minutes: Brian Fullmer presented the Fern Subdivision Alley Vacation. Anna Anglin stated the alley was only visible on paper,reviewed the number of property owners that signed the petition,and detailed the use of the alley by the surrounding properties. Kathleen A.Bratcher (applicant)stated she was available to answer any questions. 10.Informational:Engineering Division's Six Year Pavement Plan and Roadway Selection Committee Presentation Written Briefing MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 11 The Council will receive a written briefing about the 2020 Six Year Pavement Plan regarding street conditions and projects in the City.A presentation to the Roadway Selection Committee is also included.The plan and presentation identify upcoming street reconstruction locations and estimated costs.The reconstructions are largely funded by an $87 million voter-approved bond which is part of the Funding Our Future initiative.Other information provided includes the street network overall pavement condition,recently completed street reconstructions,and the City’s approach to street maintenance. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 6,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Council requested Staff to add Council District boundaries to the map. Ben Luedtke reviewed the rotation of the street plan throughout the Council Districts. Standing Items 11.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. Minutes: Item not held. 12.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director Report of the Executive Director,including a review of Council information items and announcements.The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business,including but not limited to scheduling items. Minutes: Item not held. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 12 13.Closed Session The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session.A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including,but not limited to: a.discussion of the character,professional competence,or physical or mental health of an individual; b.strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase,exchange,or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares,if public discussion of the transaction would: (i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration;or (ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if: (i)public discussion of the transaction would: (A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration;or MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 13 (B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale;and (iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel,devices,or systems; and g.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code §78B-1-137,and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Minutes: Item not held. Meeting adjourned at 6:00 pm. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 14 Work Session meeting held Tuesday,April 6,2021. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 6,2021 15 PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Work Session on Tuesday,January 4,2022 in an Electronic Meeting. The following Council Members were present: Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Victoria Petro-Eschler, Alejandro Puy Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Amanda Lau –Public Engagement &Communication Specialist,Ben Luedtke –Senior Public Policy Analyst,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,Sam Owen –Public Policy Analyst,Chief Karl Lieb –Fire Chief,Chief Mike Brown –Police Chief,Mary Beth Thompson –Chief Financial Officer,Taylor Hill –City Council Staff,Michelle Barney –Minutes &Records Clerk, Thais Stewart –Deputy City Recorder,Kaletta Lynch –Chief Equity Officer,Moana Uluave-Hafoka –Equity Manager,Nole Walkingshaw –Deputy Director of Administrative Services,Elizabeth Buehler –Civic Engagement Manager,Richard Boden –Battalion Chief Council Member Amy Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 2:03 Work Session Items MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 1 1.Nomination of Council Chair and Vice Chair for Calendar Year 2022 ~2:00 p.m. 15 min. The Council will take a straw poll to nominate the Council Chair and Vice Chair for calendar year 2022.The process includes expressions of interest from Council Members,nominations for each position,and then voting each for the Chair and Vice Chair positions. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 4,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 4,2022 Minutes: Council Member Fowler welcomed everyone to the meeting,reviewed the COVID-19 protocols and the process to elect a new Chair and Vice Chair for the 2022 calendar year. Council Member Mano nominated Council Member Dugan for the position of Chair. Council Member Dugan accepted the nomination and thanked Council Member Fowler for her service,intent and conduct while serving as Council Chair. A Poll was held by ballot to elect Council Member Dugan as the Chair for the 2022 calendar year. Council Member Dugan nominated Council Member Mano for the position of Vice Chair. Council Member Mano accepted the nomination;expressed his desire to work along side Council Member Dugan to lead the Council and address challenging issues. A Poll was held by ballot to elect Council Member Mano as the Vice Chair for the 2022 calendar year. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 2 2.Informational:Updates from the Administration ~2:15 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive an update from the Administration on major items or projects, including but not limited to: •COVID-19,the March 2020 Earthquake,and the September 2020 Windstorm; •Updates on relieving the condition of people experiencing homelessness; •Police Department work,projects,and staffing,etc.;and •Other projects or updates. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Mayor Mendenhall reviewed the COVID-19 statistics for Utah and vaccination locations. Andrew Johnston reviewed the statistics of people experiencing homelessness in Salt Lake City,outreach events,shelter capacities and operation hours,scheduled cleaning and abatement activities,outreach conducted for staffing shelters and the status of renovations for the emergency shelter. Mayor Mendenhall spoke to the request of the State to open the Sugar House overflow shelter and a warming center as was done in the past. Council,Mayor,and staff discussed addressing complaints regarding RVs parked and used as shelters,encampments,the Health Department authority and discretion,opportunities for assistance to operate warming centers,shelters and overflow shelters.Additionally,discussion regarding the shortage of staff available and wages was held. Council Members requested additional discussion and information about the Code Blue Ordinance option,and how its application might impact commitments and prior ordinances made with regard to homeless resource centers and the surrounding communities. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 3 3.Informational:Updates on Racial Equity and Policing ~2:45 p.m. 15 min. The Council will hold a discussion about recent efforts on various projects City staff are working on related to racial equity and policing in the City.The conversation may include issues of community concern about race,equity,and justice in relation to law enforcement policies, procedures,budget,and ordinances.Discussion may include: •An update or report on the Commission on Racial Equity in Policing;and •Other project updates or discussion. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Allison Rowland reviewed the schedule for the Racial Equity in Policing (REP)Commission meetings. Kaletta Lynch thanked Chief Brown and his staff for their time/commitment to working with REP commissioners and (thanked)the public for their feedback throughout Phase I of the process for the REP commission. Moana Uluave-Hafoka noted the Phase I plan was presented by Chief Brown to the REP Commission on December 20,2021 (also forwarded to Council Staff).During the meeting, feedback from the commission was provided to Chief Brown,including budgetary review items to be provided to the Council at a future date after further deliberation from the REP Commission."reviewed the Phase 1 response from Chief Brown and asked for questions. Chief Mike Brown reviewed the Phasetha 1 plan and the budgetary needs to implement the plan. Council and staff discussed the position of a full time recruiter,determining if it should be a police officer or a citizen;who would be developing the script for responses and determining where calls were directed,the Critical Response Team development and timeline for implementation. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 4 4.Informational:SLC Emergency Management Update 2022 ~3:00 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive an annual report of the City’s emergency procedures,the Council’s role in an emergency,and an overview of Emergency Management’s current programs and efforts. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 4,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Fire Chief Karl Lieb welcomed the Council Members and commended them on the Oath of Office Ceremony,welcomed Battalion Chief Richard Boden,reviewed goals of the SLC Emergency Management system,the increase in the number of full time staff employed by SLCPD,Fix the Bricks program would be moved to the Community and Neighborhood Department,24/7 emergency contact line for City Administrators,partnership with County, State and Federal agencies,maximizing current Public Safety Building office space to accommodate increased staff,modifying City Emergency notification system (Rave Mobile Safety),coordinating with all City departments to create or update Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP),joint venture with Sustainability Department to implement new Community Resilience program,and implementing new Employee Preparedness apps (guidebook & SLCImOK). Battalion Chief Richard Boden reviewed the emergency activation levels and notifications, Emergency Operations Coordination operation details and the Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 5 5.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 ~3:30 p.m. 15 min. The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document,for Fiscal Year 2021-22.Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications.The proposed amendment includes funding for low-income senior and veteran transitional housing and public safety overtime in neighborhoods hosting homeless shelters,among other items. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 4,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,December 14,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,January 4,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Minutes: Ben Luedtke reviewed the Ordinance for the Budget Amendment No.5 for fiscal year 2021-22,the request for adopting time sensitive items,A-1:Salt Lake County Police Services at Homeless Resource Centers Contract ($400,000 from Fund Balance),E-1:COVID-19 Local Assistance Matching Grant for the Switchpoint Hotel Project ($3 million from Misc. Grants),I-1:Council Office Reclassification and Amending FY22 Appointed Pay Plan (-0-)and I-2:CARES Act Unused Funds –Firefighter Personnel Expenses (Estimated at $47,000 and presumption authorization was for all unused funds). Council and staff discussed the relationship between private groups leasing City property and how improvements were regulated,public benefits of improving the tennis courts and Wasatch Hills Tennis program,how the process differed when there was a privately funded capital improvement or a City funded capital improvement,the City’s donation ordinance,state regulations for donations and construction of City owned property,the CIP Board’s recommendation on the proposal and the collapse of the tennis bubble at Liberty Park. Council Members requested to keep in mind maintenance costs at all times. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 6 6.Informational:2020 Census Results for Salt Lake City and Council Districts ~3:45 p.m. 45 min. The Council will receive a briefing from the Gardner Policy Institute about the 2020 Census results for Salt Lake City and individual results for the seven Council Districts.This information will be used as part of the City's Council redistricting process over the coming months. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 4,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Ben Luedtke introduced the results of the 2020 Census,presented the ideal district populations based on the results,the 2020 Census results by Council District Summary Table, and the possible need to redistrict in Salt Lake City. Mallory Bateman (Kem C.Gardner Policy Institute),presented the 2020 Census Redistricting Data including:total populations for states,counties,cities,and other statistical geographies;detailed race and ethnicity;over and under 18 year old populations;housing unit data –occupied or vacant,stated they had not received information regarding relationships in household,tenure,ancestry,sex and full age detail,reported Salt Lake was the largest city in Utah and reviewed the population growth for cities in Salt Lake County,council district population and change,Census Tract changes,the decline in the under 18 population between 2010 and 2020,and increased racial and ethnic diversity. Council and staff discussed if the diversity numbers reflected what was happening in the world, the definition of absolute truth in the results,the location of new apartment construction versus the growth in population,the process of redistricting and why it was necessary,and the timeline for redistricting. 7.Tentative Break ~4:30 p.m. 20 min. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 7 8.Informational:Chart of Account Updates ~4:50 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the Chart of Accounts update.The Chart of Accounts is the collection of cost centers and object codes staff uses to track expenses.This is a critical component for the Workday ERP project because the Chart of Accounts serves as the foundation for the financial system and all financial transactions.A revised Chart of Accounts will allow staff to easily report out on leadership priorities with a cleaner,simpler structure. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 4,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Mary Beth Thompson reviewed the ERP program for the new Human Resources and Finance Department software,implementation of Workday software,funding for program based funding and revenues,next steps for implementing the system throughout the City,and the Fall 2021 budget survey results. Rob Roque (GFOA),introduced the Workday ERP project stating it served as a foundation for financial systems and all financial transactions,provided Workday concepts,and GFOA Recommended practices. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 8 9.Resolution:Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds,Community Capital Improvement Projects (Series 2021A and 2021B)Follow-up ~5:10 p.m. 40 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of up to $58 million for a tax exempt bond and a taxable bond that would fund several community capital improvement projects;giving authority to certain officers to approve the final terms and provisions of the sale within parameters set forth in the resolution;and providing for related matters. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,September 14,2021;Tuesday,November 16,2021;and Tuesday,January 4, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Minutes: Ben Luedtke reviewed the resolution for the Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Community Capital Improvement Projects (Series 2021A and 2021B),the time frame for the Bond. Council and staff discussed the possible changes coming in the next transmittal that would greatly change the proposal,how inflation had affected the proposal and if the values would increase if the review process was drawn out,time line and budget amount,the process in selecting which projects were funded,the tax status of the bonds and timeframe for each. Council Members requested additional conversation regarding prioritization with the Mayor’s Office. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 9 10.Informational:State Legislative Briefing ~5:50 p.m. 30 min. The Council will be briefed by the Administration and Governmental Affairs Leader about the upcoming 2022 State Legislative session. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 4,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Kate Bradshaw (Lobbyist Representative)reviewed key policy issues that would be addressed with the Legislature,specifically homelessness and affordable housing,maintaining local control regarding land use and fireworks,law enforcement,inland port,water and related land use issues,Olympics,airport,and Salt Lake City Cemetery, Council Member Fowler explained the legislative committee was comprised of the Council Chair,Former Chair,and RDA Chair,working with the lobbyist to address policy issues. Council and Ms.Bradshaw discussed the bills presented to the Legislature regarding COVID-19,affordable housing initiatives,funding for the Cemetery,alcohol licenses,land use controls,threats to City watershed,Speaker Wilson’s summit on the Great Salt Lake scheduled for January 5,2022,regulation of hard seltzer,urgency to address the Great Salt Lake,and Accessory Dwelling Units. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 10 11.Board Appointment:Bicycle Advisory Committee –Ashley Lodmell ~6:20 p.m. 5 min. The Council will interview Ashley Lodmell prior to considering appointment to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending January 4,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 4,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 4,2022 Minutes: Council Member Fowler introduced Ashley Lodmell as a candidate for the Bicycle Advisory Committee. Ashley Lodmell gave a brief job history and expressed her desire to serve on the Bicycle Advisory Committee. Council Member Fowler stated the appoinment would be on the Formal Consent Agenda. 12.Resolution:Amending Resolution No.31 of 2021 relating to a State Infrastructure Bank Loan to the City Written Briefing - The Council will receive a written briefing about a resolution that would amend resolution No.31 of 2021,relating to a State Infrastructure (SIB)loan to the City from UDOT,to state and clarify that the loan will be payable from the City’s Innkeepers Tax rather than from sales tax revenue;and providing for related matters. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 4,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Minutes: Written briefing only. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 11 Standing Items 13.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. Minutes: Item not held. 14.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director Report of the Executive Director,including a review of Council information items and announcements.The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business,including but not limited to; •Financial Disclosure;and •Scheduling Items. Minutes: Cindy Gust Jenson reviewed Conflict of Interest forms that might need to be submitted or revised. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 12 15.Tentative Closed Session The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session.A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including,but not limited to: a.discussion of the character,professional competence,or physical or mental health of an individual; b.strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase,exchange,or lease of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if public discussion of the transaction would: (i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration;or (ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if: (i)public discussion of the transaction would: (A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration;or (B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale;and (iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel,devices,or systems;and g.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code §78B-1-137,and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to enter into Closed Session for the purposes of:discussion regarding deployment of security personnel,devices,or systems;and for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code §78B-1-137,and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. AYE:Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Victoria Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy Final Result:7 –0 Pass Minutes: Closed Session Started at 6:20 pm Council Members in Attendance:Council Members Dugan,Fowler,Petro-Eschler,Puy,Mano, Wharton and Valdemoros (online) MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 13 City Staff in Attendance:Mayor Mendenhall,Katherine Lewis,Nathan Kobs,Brendan Cochrane,Berenice Zuenguaz,Lisa Shaffer,Mary Beth Thompson,Beatrix Sieger,Allison Rowland,Ben Luedtke,Taylor Hill,Rachel Otto,Sam Owen,Tracey Fletcher,Cindy Gust- Jenson,Jennifer Bruno,Cindy Lou Trishman. Council Member Wharton moved,and Council Member Dugan seconded to exit the Closed Session.A roll call vote was held and was unanimous by all present. Closed Session ended at 6:32 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 14 Meeting adjourned at 6:30 pm Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday,January 4,2022. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 4,2022 15 PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Work Session on Tuesday,January 11,2022 in an electronic meeting pursuant to the Chair’s determination. The following Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros,Amy Fowler,Darin Mano,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Victoria Petro-Eschler, Alejandro Puy Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Ben Luedtke –Senior Public Policy Analyst,Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Chief Mike Brown –Police Chief,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,Andrew Johnston –Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach,DeeDee Robinson –Minutes and Records Clerk,Nick Tarbet –Senior Public Policy Analyst,Sam Owen –Public Policy Analyst,Taylor Hill –City Council Staff,Laura Briefer –Public Utilities Director,Mary Beth Thompson –Chief Financial Officer,Isaac Canedo –City Council Staff,Matt Cassel –City Engineer Council Member Dugan presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 2:05 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 1 Work Session Items MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 2 1.Informational:Updates from the Administration ~2:00 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive an update from the Administration on major items or projects, including but not limited to: •COVID-19,the March 2020 Earthquake,and the September 2020 Windstorm; •Updates on relieving the condition of people experiencing homelessness; •Police Department work,projects,and staffing,etc.;and •Other projects or updates. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Mayor Mendenhall provided information regarding: COVID-19 Updates: •Current Metrics •14-day case rate in Salt Lake County was up by 161% •Cases were currently surging (Omicron variant) •Vaccination rates •30-day mask mandate for Salt Lake County in effect until February 7,2022 •Respirator masks being required indoors/public spaces •Salt Lake City’s 14-day snapshot (case data) •ICU rates (at capacity today) •Citywide vaccination average:67.16% Andrew Johnston provided information regarding: Homelessness Update •Homeless Resource Center and Overflow Occupancy (January 1 –January 7); shelter/bed capacity •Resource Fairs:Next one to be held January 21 (location TBD) •Cleaning and abatement beginning this week,occupied vehicle response had begun (900 South being addressed last week) •Overflow shelter status:Weigand Center opened doors last night (nightly capacity for 35 people),High Needs Temporary Housing Program (formerly Ramada Inn)would be opened in phases beginning next week for elderly and medically vulnerable persons, Emergency Shelter beds (801 990-9999 –best way for referrals) •Annual Point In Time count to occur two weeks from now,looking for 500 volunteers from Salt Lake County,Jan 27,28,29 4-6 am,sign up at endutahhomelessness.org, helpful for gathering accurate information for funding (services)and planning MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 3 Council Member Fowler requested more information regarding the Point In Time count to provide to Community Councils in her district and for distribution in her newsletter. Chief Mike Brown provided information regarding: Update on Response Times •Timing for Priority 1 through 3 call types •Improvements from November 2021 to December 2021 •2021 Salt Lake City Police Department (SLCPD)received 127,668 calls for service, increase of 4,303 from 2020,response times continued to improve •Implementation of telephonic/reporting capabilities –October 20,2021 to January 3, 2022 SLCPD officers having handled 2,092 calls for service,SLCPD generated 577 police written reports during the program,average telephonic officer handling about 29 calls for service per shift •CompStat Update:First week of 2021 to December 2021:overall crime Citywide down 5.4% •New recruit class 156 started Monday (January 10,2022):27 new officers (eight female, many with diverse backgrounds)graduation date estimated June 2022 •Sworn vacant positions down to 33 2.Informational:Updates on Racial Equity and Policing TENTATIVE - The Council will hold a discussion about recent efforts on various projects City staff are working on related to racial equity and policing in the City.The conversation may include issues of community concern about race,equity,and justice in relation to law enforcement policies,procedures,budget,and ordinances.Discussion may include: •An update or report on the Commission on Racial Equity in Policing;and •Other project updates or discussion. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Item not held. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 4 3.Ordinance:Amendment to Require Notice for Permits to Work in the Public Way Follow-up ~2:30 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing on proposed amendments to City code that would require notice for permits to work in the public way.The Council has requested that Engineering codify and expand the policy that adjacent property owners are notified of work being performed in the right of way. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 12,2021;Tuesday,February 9,2021;Tuesday,January 11,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,December 8,2020 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,January 19,2021 TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Minutes: Nick Tarbet provided a brief overview of the proposed amendments,noted Council Member previous concerns were addressed within the briefing materials,and noted feedback from the Council was sought if changes made were satisfactory and recommendation for further public comment. Council Member Dugan expressed the importance of providing local contact information for residents to reach and not someone that was out of state or in a remote location. Matt Cassel said he would ensure that a local contact be required,there would be a one- MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 5 time attempt to contact residents (and ensure successful contact was made)before issuance of a permit to work in the public way;a pre-permit notification would be made as well as a pre-construction notification made so residents were made aware of potential work.He added that the contact information provided to residents would include the contractor’s information as well as Engineering’s information and could be used for late evening/emergency issues. 4.City’s Annual Financial Audit Report ~2:50 p.m. 30 min. The Council will be briefed about the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the previous fiscal year,and the Management Auditor's letters regarding internal controls and compliance. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 11,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Cindy Gust-Jenson provided an overview regarding: •Contract for annual financial audit was with the legislative body (Council/RDA Board) •By statute,the Council was responsible to assure the City’s finances were audited annually •Components of overall audit included Airport and Public Utilities audits •EideBailly was the audit firm and was available for follow-up work and directly to Council Members as a resource Paul Skeen (EideBailly Consultant),provided information regarding: •Overview of reporting;“clean audit”–issuance of an unqualified opinion (no MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 6 exceptions to opinion) •Audit procedures started end of July through December 2021 •Noted the City’s Finance team was well staffed and was a critical knowledge source •Area of emphasis included housing loans being reconciled to the records of the Finance team (more effort needed for reconciliation/communication between the two departments) •Roles of the audit firm Michael Michelsen (EideBailly Consultant),provided information regarding: •Issuance of a single audit reporting package that included three additional auditors reports:Government auditing standards (reporting on internal controls),State compliance (fraud risk assessments),and single audit of federal funds (COVID relief funding distribution;Airport improvement program,City’s CDBG program,etc.) •No instances of non-compliance and no instances of internal control related to non- compliance for single audit of federal funds •Additional details were available regarding management’s summary of findings from last year and how they were remediated as well as findings related to the financial statements within the provided document Mary Beth Thompson spoke on the new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)system being able to properly track receivables and revenues and be balanced on a monthly basis (satisfying the recommendation for better tracking of housing loans),and said the risk assessment ending FY 2021 (as part of the state compliance portion of the annual audit)was available within the Council’s packet. 5.Informational:Redistricting Legal Requirements and Considerations ~3:20 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive a briefing from the City Attorney’s Office about the legal requirements and considerations of redistricting.The Council District boundaries are evaluated and potentially adjusted every ten years based on the Census results.Legal requirements and considerations exist in several laws and case law as established in the courts. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 11,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Benjamin Luedtke provided the following information: •Memo available to the Council providing legal requirements and considerations from last redistricting (10 years ago)that included statutes (for multiple levels of government)and case law established in the courts MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 7 •Timeline;two week application period beginning this week for Redistricting Advisory Commission (RAC)–to recommend maps to the Council,commission expected to meet in February and March approximately four times,the Council would review recommended maps in April and hold public hearings,legal deadline to adopt new map was May 10,2022 •Commission envisioned to have at least one member (or more)for each Council district •Citywide postcard to all residents for information on how to participate in the redistricting process •Dedicated redistricting website:tinyurl.com/slcredistricting, •New voting precincts to be decided by Salt Lake County Council possibly today •Rundown of typical application process (starting the clock tomorrow,closing two weeks from now,application could be filled out online) •Council Members could provide direction to the RAC to be better prepared for their role Council Member Fowler requested a graphic for timeline of the redistricting process to provide to City residents. Further discussion among Council Members ensued regarding application criteria and eligibility requirements for RAC members. Katherine Lewis provided information regarding: •Eligibility of commission members/participants being the decision of the Council •General rule (State/Federal law and City Code)that each district (City Council/School) must be in substantial equal population •History of previous redistricting process •This year’s issue of one portion of Salt Lake City’s School District residing in Millcreek (County Council having authority for redistricting in that area) •Legal requirement of each district’s population to be similar in size (equal representation) •Principles of school district redistricting and how they should be considered for City redistricting •Should the Council Member’s place of residence be moved into a different district during the redistricting process,the Council Member could remain on the Council, representing their current district MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 8 6.Tentative Break ~3:50 p.m. 20 min. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 9 7.Informational:City's Watershed and Water Policy ~4:10 p.m. 25 min. Council Members will receive information about the city’s watershed policy and history, including its connection with water rights and water issues.The discussion will also include history surrounding the city’s service of water outside our municipal boundaries,and the connected issues. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 11,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Sam Owen provided a brief introduction to the City’s Watershed and Water Policies. Laura Briefer provided information regarding: •Sources of Drinking Water –Streams (accounting for 55%)including Little Cottonwood Creek,Big Cottonwood Creek,City Creek,Reservoirs (35%)including Deer Creek, Jordanelle,Mountain Dell/Little Dell,and Groundwater (10%) •Water Supply Areas in relation to City boundaries •History of the City’s water supply;first diversion of City Creek,first long-range water planning effort,water treatment facilities constructed for Wasatch Front streams,etc. •Water Right Exchange contracts;history concerning needs (growing population,reliable supply sources,etc),50 exchanges remaining in place today •Utah Lake Jordan River State Water Right Adjudication:action in District Court,binds water users and the State Engineer (Division of Water Rights),governed by Utah State Code:Title 73,Chapter 4. •Salt Lake City’s Protected Watersheds:City Creek Canyon,Parley’s Canyon,Big Cottonwood Canyon,and Little Cottonwood Canyon •Watershed statistics:190 square miles in area;elevations from 5,000,to 11,500 feet, comprises 50%to 60%of water supply,residing in multiple government jurisdictions, visitation greater than Yellowstone Nation Park (5 million people a year) •Historical watershed context:rehabilitation from mining/logging,typhoid outbreaks due to high recreation in watershed areas,runoff flu causing illness due to mining/de- forestation in the canyons •Regulatory and policy context for watershed protection;Federal/State Safe Drinking Water Statutes and Rules,regulating for contaminants in drinking water,Salt Lake City Watershed Ordinance (17.04 and 17.08),SLC Watershed Management Plan,etc. •Managing watersheds;land conservation and stewardship,partnerships,public education,purchase of irrigation shares,monitoring,and regulation (ordinances),water quality report prepared annually •Interrelated resource plans/studies informing Management &Policy:Watershed Management Policy (currently being updated),Water Conservation Plan (updated 2020),etc. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 10 •2022 Water Legislation:HB 21 –Water Testing Requirements for lead (school/childcare),HB 33 –Instream water flow amendments,HB 37 –State Water Policy Amendments,HB 64 –Drinking Water Amendments,SB 31 –Water Rights Proofs,and any legislation impacting watersheds 8.Ordinance:City's Designated Water Service Area ~4:35 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a current proposal for the City to establish by ordinance and map a designated water service area.The proposed water service area is congruent with existing and historical service commitments.The proposal is the result of a new requirement cascading from Utah's 2020 constitutional amendment D,which passed. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 11,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Minutes: Laura Briefer provided information regarding: •Salt Lake City’s water service area;developed over the last century through unincorporated Salt Lake County,annexations to the City considered where water was served but not carried out historically,several cities incorporated on top of the system over time,not including the canyon areas •State Legislation driving creation of Designated Water Service Area;Constitutional Amendment D;HJR (House Joint Resolution)3 (2020)resolved ambiguity regarding municipal authority to provide water outside City boundaries,HB 31 (2019) required cities to create a map showing its designated water service area upon passage of constitutional amendment MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 11 9.Resolution:Utah Inland Port Authority Board ~4:55 p.m. 15 min. The Council will discuss a new appointment to the Utah Inland Port Authority Board. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 11,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 18,2022 Minutes: Council Member Fowler nominated Council Member Petro-Eschler to serve on the Inland Port Authority Board due to her district’s proximity (Westside representation). Council Member Petro-Eschler accepted the nomination and said she was prepared to hold the important seat,it was a top issue for her constituents,and appreciated the opportunity to advocate for not only the Westside,but the City as a whole. Straw Poll:Unanimous support for Council Member Petro-Eschler’s appointment to the Inland Port Authority Board. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 12 Standing Items 10.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. Minutes: Item not held. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 13 11.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director - - Report of the Executive Director,including a review of Council information items and announcements.The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business,including but not limited to; •Council District Newsletters for Public Utilities Mailing;and •Scheduling Items. Minutes: A.Council District Newsletters for Public Utilities Mailing At the beginning of each calendar year,the Public Utilities Department identifies certain months for Council Members to include Council District newsletters as an insert in residents’monthly utility bills.Each Council Member may opt to use the Public Utility billing for outreach purposes once per calendar year. The advantage of sharing in the Public Utilities mailings is Council Members only pay for printing expenses out of their communication budget,saving on costs associated with postage. Due to limitations with mail sorting machines,only three Council District newsletters can be accommodated each month. Ø The following months have been identified for the Council to include a newsletter insert.Please let staff know which month you would like to include a newsletter as part of the Public Utilities billing: o April o August o December MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 14 Council Members Puy and Fowler requested December,Council Members Mano and Dugan requested August,Council Members Petro- Eschler and Wharton indicated they were flexible (any open option), and Council Member Valdemoros requested April. B.Association of Municipal Council (AMC)–Council Member Representative Needed With Council Member Mano moving into the Council leadership an opportunity to participate on the AMC has opened up. The AMC consists of Council Members who represent each municipality within Salt Lake County.They meet to discuss hot topics of interest in their communities, collaborate with members of other councils and see how they are handling issues that each other may have in common. The AMC meetings are held virtually and occurs on the second Tuesday of every month at noon-1pm. Ø Is there a Council Member interested in being appointed to represent Salt Lake City at these AMC monthly meetings? Council Member Fowler said she would be interested in representing the City for AMC meetings.It was agreed among Council Members for Council Member Fowler to attend the monthly meetings. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 15 12.Tentative Closed Session - - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session.A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including,but not limited to: a.discussion of the character,professional competence,or physical or mental health of an individual; b.strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase,exchange,or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares,if public discussion of the transaction would: (i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if: (i)public discussion of the transaction would: (A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration;or (B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale;and (iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel,devices,or systems;and g.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code §78B-1-137,and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Minutes: Item not held. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 16 Meeting adjourned at:5:16 pm. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday,January 11,2022. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 11,2022 17 PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Work Session on Tuesday,February 1,2022 in an electronic meeting pursuant to the Chair’s determination. The following Council Members were present: Amy Fowler,Darin Mano,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Victoria Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy The following Council Members were absent: Ana Valdemoros Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Ben Luedtke –Senior Public Policy Analyst,Brian Fullmer –Constituent Liaison,Policy Analyst, Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Chief Mike Brown –Police Chief,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,Andrew Johnston –Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach,DeeDee Robinson –Minutes and Records Clerk,Ben Kolendar –Economic Development Director,Sylvia Richards –Public Policy Analyst,Taylor Hill –City Council Staff,Mary Beth Thompson –Chief Financial Officer,Nick Norris –Planning Director,Allison Rowland –Public Policy Analyst,Felica Baca –Arts Division Director,Kaletta Lynch –Chief Equity Officer,Amanda Roman –Principal Planner,Ashley Lichtle –Community Liaison,Kristina Gilmore –Principal Planner Council Member Dugan presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 2:08 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 1 Work Session Items MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 2 1.Informational:Updates from the Administration ~2:00 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive an update from the Administration on major items or projects, including but not limited to: •COVID-19,the March 2020 Earthquake,and the September 2020 Windstorm; •Updates on relieving the condition of people experiencing homelessness; •Police Department work,projects,and staffing,etc.;and •Other projects or updates. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Mayor Mendenhall provided information regarding: COVID-19 Update •All but one Utah county reporting “high transmission” •Cases beginning to plateau based on hospitalizations •Salt Lake County vaccination rates •Significant strain remaining on hospitals –increased by 57%since early January •30.5%of eligible population were up to date on COVID-19 vaccination •Total cases,current cases,total hospitalized for Salt Lake County •Citywide vaccination average:67.67% Andrew Johnston provided information regarding: Homelessness Update •Shelter capacities/bed availability for Homeless Resource Center (HRC)and Overflow •Resource fair on January 21,2022 including engagement,vaccinations,provided meals, etc. •Cleaning and abatement to be addressed this week and next •Overflow shelter status for St.Vincent de Paul,Weigand Center,motel rooms,High Needs Temporary Housing Program,Redwood Overflow beds •Emergency shelter access line:801 990-9999 Chief Mike Brown provided information regarding: •Rate of pay for Full Time Officers;recently issued raises,additional discussion planned for next week regarding a comparison between other agencies in the valley/across the state •Staffing update;currently 37 vacancies –down from 60 in July 2021,14 new officers (including new and lateral hires)graduating from the academy on February 4,2022 –ready for deployment on the streets in June 2022,26 additional officers started academy in January 2021 and expected to be deployed in November 2022 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 3 2.Informational:Redistricting Update ~2:30 p.m. 10 min. The Council will receive an update on the City's redistricting process to update Council District boundaries based on the 2020 Census results.A resident Redistricting Advisory Commission will recommend maps to the Council. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Benjamin Luedtke provided information regarding: •Public hearings were tentatively scheduled for April 2022 •Potential action expected from the Council in early May 2022 •Advisory Commission shall have at least one member from each Council district •Application period was now closed •Commission to meet in February and March (four times) •Post card planned to reach all households in the City to notify residents on potential involvement •May 10,2022 was the legal deadline to adopt a new map •40 applications received (eight applications received after the submission deadline), and policy questions for the Council. Council Member Dugan provided selection process suggestions,including:one member on the board from each district,up to 9 to 11 members,sub-committee of three Council Members to bring board member recommendations back to the full Council for approval. Council Members Puy and Fowler expressed support to volunteer for the sub-committee. Council Member Puy suggested the Council accept all applications including those that were submitted late. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 4 3.Informational:Equity Update ~2:40 p.m. 15 min The Council will hold a discussion about various initiatives led by the City's Office of Equity and Inclusion.These initiatives include,but are not limited to,improving racial equity and justice in policing.Discussion may also include updates on the City's other work to achieve equitable service delivery,decision-making,and community engagement through the Citywide Equity Plan,increased ADA resources,language access,and other topics addressed in the ongoing work of the Human Rights Commission and the Racial Equity in Policing Commission. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Item not held. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 5 4.Ordinance:Accessibility and Disability Commission ~2:55 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a resolution that would amend Section 2.07.020, Section 10.02.040,Section 10.02.110 and enact chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission.The proposed changes would formalize the Commission,recognizing its important advisory role in improving and enhancing accessibility for community members experiencing a disability through a practice, systematic,and solution-based approach. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 15,2022 Minutes: Allison Rowland provided a brief introduction to the ordinance,detailed policy questions for the Council,and noted the Council was scheduled for a potential vote on February 15, 2022. Ashley Lichtle and Kaletta Lynch provided information regarding: •Membership of the Accessibility Advisory Committee (made up of 12 persons) •Committee already having served as an advisory committee to the Mayor with a potential change to advise both Mayor and Council •Work the committee had completed so far (visual interpretation service for blind/low- vision,recommending accessibility improvements for the Airport,Eccles Theater,and dockless scooters,epilepsy training for Airport staff,involved in providing feedback for visual accessibility for City surveys,etc.) •Ordinance proposed a make up of 15 members (increase from 12) •Proposal for all members of Accessibility Advisory Committee to be appointed to the Accessibility and Disability Commission •Involvement of the Human Rights Commission (HRC)within the structure of the newly proposed commission Council Member Wharton stated the importance of the HRC (along with its involvement in the newly proposed commission),and noted its general underutilization. Council Member Dugan said the policy questions were valuable,including available child care during committee meetings,and said separate discussions on all questions should be held. Council Member Puy said this topic was important to him and he supported the effort. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 6 5.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 ~3:15 p.m. 45 min The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document,for Fiscal Year 2021-22.Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications.The proposed amendment includes funding for new Arts Council employees,adding a second sergeant to the Special Victims Unit,and additional Emergency Rental Assistance Program funding from the Federal Government,among other items. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 Minutes: Benjamin Luedtke provided an introduction to the ordinance,public hearing for the item was scheduled for February 15,2022,35 items were in the budget amendment for the Council to consider totaling $2.7M from fund balance,impact fee use information,and provided information regarding: •Item A-1:$25,000 (Fund Balance)–Annual Membership for Suazo Business Center •Item A-2:$66,000 (Fund Balance)–Moving Grants Manager full time employee (FTE)from ARPA funding to General Fund •Item A-3:$50,000 (Fund Balance)–Healthcare Innovation Branding Biohive •Item A-4:(Budget Neutral)–Fix the Bricks Program and FTE transfer from Fire Department to Community and Neighborhoods Department •Item A-5:$135,971 (Fund Balance)–Additional Police Sergeant for Special Victims Unit •Item A-6:$214,538 (Fund Balance)–Police Access Control Upgrade and Support •Item A-7:$25,000 (Fund Balance)–Fireworks Budget •Item A-9:$175,000 (Fund Balance)–Arts Council Staff Increase of 3 FTEs •Item A-10:(Budget Neutral)–Allen Park CIP Rescope •Item A-11:$39,792 (Fund Balance)–Executive Assistant in the Mayor’s Office •Item A-12:$90,000 (Fund Balance)–Citywide Equity Study •Item A-13:$938,076 (to Fleet Fund from Several Sources)–Fuel Cost Increases •Item A-14:$200,000 (General Fund)–COVID Personal Protective Equipment Mary Beth Thompson provided information regarding expiration of Impact Fees,and an overview regarding revenue for FY 2022 budget adjustments,including: •Sales &Use Tax projections ($3.8M increase) •Franchise Tax (down $402K) •Licensing &Permits projection ($4.6M increase) •Sales &Use Tax –½cent ($2.3M increase) •Total General Fund projection at $10.8M MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 7 Discussion was held between Council,Administration,and staff regarding timing of Suazo Business Center membership (through mid-year budget amendment process or general annual budget process),and details of the request for additional sergeant for Special Victims Unit –reasoning for being presented in the budget amendment and timeline to hire for the position. Council Member Puy expressed concern for the funding proposed on Item A-7 due to the City’s air quality issues.Mayor Mendenhall responded in agreement of the concern and shared reasoning for the proposal (when formal shows were not hosted,more people participated in lighting fireworks themselves in unsafe areas).Council Member Puy appreciated the response,and requested data for the purpose of hosting the shows. Council Member Dugan requested answers to policy questions on Item A-4.(Written briefing was preferable to a verbal briefing.) Council Member Fowler requested a future small group meeting to discuss Arts Council requested items;possible pay disparity,job details,scope of the City’s responsibility (role clarity/function),funding,etc. 6.Ordinance:Rezone and Master Plan Amendment for the Former Fire Station No.3 Property ~4:00 p.m. 15 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 1085 East Simpson Avenue,1095 East Simpson Avenue, 1097 East Simpson Avenue,and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive to rezone those properties from PL (Public Lands)District to CSHBD1 (Sugar House Business District)and amending the Sugar House Community Plan Future Land Use Map.The purpose for the proposal is to consolidate the subject properties with the property to the east for future development.Both properties are owned by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City.There is no development proposal associated with this request.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 8 Minutes: Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction for the ordinance. Nick Norris provided information regarding: •Project request (existing/proposed zoning) •Details of the Future Land Use Map •Plan being supportive of expanding the Sugar House Business District •Current zoning designation of the area (proposal being consistent with surrounding properties) •Planning Commission/Planning Division having forwarded approval of the proposal Council Member Fowler expressed support for the proposal and inquired if the proposal would fit into the special assessment area in Sugar House.Ben Kolendar said he was fairly certain this proposal would fit into the assessment area.Jennifer Bruno provided information regarding tax assessment for the proposal. Council Member Petro-Eschler joined the meeting at 3:05 pm. 7.Tentative Break ~4:15 p.m. 20 min. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 8.Ordinance:Rezone at 1193 West California Avenue ~4:35 p.m. 15 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning of property located at approximately 1193 West California Avenue from R-1/7,000 (Single Family Residential District)to R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential District).If approved,the property owner intends to subdivide the property,remove the existing home and construct two new homes,potentially with attached ADUs.The owner anticipates retaining ownership of both properties.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 9 district with similar characteristics. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 Minutes: Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the ordinance and proposal. Amanda Roman and Nick Norris provided information regarding: •Project request (one parcel –approx.12,200 SF,change from R-1/7000 to R-1/5,000) •Considerations and staff analysis (compliance with Master Plan Policies,compatibility with adjacent properties,comparison made between R-1/5,000 and R-1/7,000) •Surrounding area zoning designations •Planning Department and Planning Commission having recommended approval for the proposal •Possible use/process of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)within the proposal •Pending request from the Planning Commission for the City to initiate a petition to make ADUs a permitted use –with a discussion scheduled about the topic on February 9,2022 9.Ordinance:Rezone at 2060 North 2200 West ~4:50 p.m. 15 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning map pertaining to one parcel of property located at 2060 North 2200 West Street to rezone the property from AG-2 (Agricultural District)to M-1 (Light Manufacturing District).The amendment is to implement the master plan zoning and to accommodate future commercial land uses.No specific site development proposal has been submitted at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 Minutes: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 10 Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the proposal/ordinance. Krissy Gilmore provided information regarding: •Project request (one parcel –approx..64 acres,change from AG-2 to M-1 zonings,plans to accommodate future development of the property) •Considerations and staff analysis (nature of the general area,Master Plan recommendations,Inland Port overlay regulations,compatibility with adjacent properties) •Planning Commission having forwarded a positive recommendation for the proposal Nick Smith (applicant)thanked the Council for their time,said no plans had been formalized yet for the property,but wanted to move forward with the consolidation of the lots to maximize the future use,should the Council approve the proposal. 10.Resolution:Art Barn Public Benefits Analysis ~5:05 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a resolution that would authorize the waiver of lease fees for the use of the Art Barn by the Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation.The Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation &Arts Council Division is requesting to continue utilizing 54 Finch Lane,or the “Art Barn”as the administrative headquarters,housing 6.5 Arts Council FTEs and multiple seasonal and part-time employees,as well as to provide a home for the Finch Lane Art Gallery and its numerous exhibitions. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 1,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Minutes: Sylvia Richards provided a brief introduction to the proposal/resolution. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 11 Felicia Baca said the timing of this item was fortuitous because the Art Barn was born of need for service to the arts community during the great depression,built in 1931 as an arts center that was in part funded by Salt Lake City and Mayor Marcus and was named after the Commissioner of City Parks –Harry Finch (who helped secure the lease for a $1 month from the City),and its history was embeded in the social and cultural infrastructure during hard times. Council Member Dugan shared that his wedding party was held at the Finch Gallery a few years ago.Ms.Baca said a hopeful project of hers was to complete a oral history of the many people who lived there,taken art classes,and had weddings there since the 30’s and was happy to include Council Member Dugan to her list. Council Member Petro-Eschler noted her appreciation for the positive impact of the Art Barn on the community. 11.Informational:Apartment Study from the Gardner Institute ~5:25 p.m. 30 min The Council will receive a briefing from Jim Wood,Ivory-Boyer Senior Fellow at the Gardner Policy Institute,about the apartment market in Salt Lake City,and a forthcoming study that will be published by the Institute. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Jim Wood (Kem C.Gardner Policy Institute)provided information regarding: •Comparison of additional housing units to additional households (remaining in a housing shortage currently) •Market indicators including:rental market –vacancy rates remain low overall,new MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 12 home market –high rates building and demand,existing home market –price increases,sales,and days on market indicate shortage •Building permits issued for apartments and all residential units •Apartment units as percent of all residential units (having accounted for 25-30%of market), •Permits issued for apartment units in the City and Salt Lake County (County –6,000/City –3,400) •Apartment units receiving permits by City (2010 to 2021 –Salt Lake City at 46.90%) •Units under construction vs.proposed (including downtown,Salt Lake City,and suburban Salt Lake County) •Apartment projects proposed across Salt Lake County (with highest density in Salt Lake City) •Rent comparison between downtown Salt Lake City to Salt Lake County (Salt Lake City approx.40%higher) •Housing price increases by metropolitan area (Tooele and Salt Lake County) •Demonstration of impact for potential homebuyers mortgage payment for median priced home in Salt Lake County (2015 –$280,000 to 2021 –$550,000) •Apartment market being a critical component of housing supply (providing some measure of affordability,relieving doubling-up in households,needed to counter conditions in ownership market,and projections of vacancy rates into 2024 for the suburban and downtown markets) •Tax credit program information and its use within the City •Suggestions/recommendations to improve/increase affordable housing in Salt Lake City (housing programs targeting units for low-income near transit areas,higher mix of units,targeting units for certain levels of income). 12.Informational:State Legislative Briefing ~5:55 p.m. 30 min The Council will be briefed about issues affecting the City that may arise during the 2022 Utah State Legislative Session. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Minutes: Kate Bradshaw (Holland &Hart Law Firm,contract lobbyist),provided an overview of current legislation aligning with the City’s priorities,including: •Bills targeting water;Senate Bill (SB)33 –beneficial use of water,SB 110 –landscaping alternatives/water use during droughts,allowing municipal control of landscaping ordinances,etc. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 13 •Water bills of concern regarding extraterritorial jurisdiction and surplus water contracts •Bill for local government to provide retail incentives •Housing and homelessness legislation;target goal of $3M of homeless mitigation funding (with the addition of State funds) •Prioritization of funding for the Salt Lake City Cemetery ($5M) •Law enforcement legislation;a bill requested by the City for illegal racing would be in committee meeting tomorrow in which Police Chief Mike Brown was scheduled to testify before,along with other property owners affected by the racing/illegal activity. 13.Board Appointment:Arts Council Board –Richard Taylor ~6:25 p.m. 5 min. The Council will interview Richard Taylor prior to considering appointment to the Arts Council Board for a term ending February 1,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Minutes: Interview was held.Council Member Dugan said Richard Taylor’s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration. 14.Board Appointment:Arts Council Board –Ayanna Allen ~6:30 p.m. 5 min. The Council will interview Ayanna Allen prior to considering appointment to the Arts Council Board for a term ending February 1,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Minutes: Interview was held.Council Member Dugan said Ayanna Allen’s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 14 Standing Items 15.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. Minutes: Council Member Mano informed Council Member Petro-Eshler,in her absence,there was a call for Council Member volunteers for the Redistricting sub-committee discussed during Agenda Item No.2.Council Member Petro-Eschler welcomed the invitation and volunteered for the three member committee. 16.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director - - Report of the Executive Director,including a review of Council information items and announcements.The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business,including but not limited to scheduling items. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 15 Minutes: Information Needed by Council Staff A.Reminder -The Council and School Board Leadership Meeting The Council and School Board leadership meeting is scheduled for this Friday,February 4 from 9 am to 10:30 am to discuss legislative issues.Attached is a list of Council legislative issues that will be shared with School Board leadership for this meeting. Please let Council staff know if you have other topics you wish to add to the agenda for this leadership meeting. Council leadership includes:Council Chair Dan Dugan;Council Vice Chair Darin Mano;and RDA Chair Ana Valdemoros. School Board leadership includes:School Board President Melissa Ford;School Board Vice President Nate Salazar,and School Board Member Kristi Swett. No discussion was held. 17.Tentative Closed Session The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session.A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including,but not limited to: a.discussion of the character,professional competence,or physical or mental health of an individual; b.strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase,exchange,or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares,if public discussion of the transaction would: (i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if: (i)public discussion of the transaction would: (A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 16 consideration;or (B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale;and (iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel,devices,or systems;and g.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code §78B-1-137,and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Minutes: Item not held. Meeting adjourned at:6:07 pm. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 17 To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday,February 1,2022. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 18 PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Formal Session on Tuesday,April 20,2021 in an Electronic Meeting,pursuant to the Chair’s determination and Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b). The following Council Members were present: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano, James Rogers Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,Robert Nutzman –Administrative Assistant,Sylvia Richards –Public Policy Analyst,Lauren Shafer –Assistant City Recorder,Taylor Hill –Council Staff Council Member Chris Wharton presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 1 A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Chris Wharton will conduct the formal meetings. Minutes: Council Member Wharton welcomed everyone in attendance. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. Minutes: An image of the flag with the text of the pledge of allegiance in English and Spanish was shared on the screen during the moment of silence. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. Minutes: Council Member Wharton stated the rules of decorum would be reviewed prior to the Public Comment portion of the meeting. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of Tuesday,June 2, 2020 and Tuesday,June 16,2020. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to approve the Work Session minutes from June 2,2020 and June 16,2020. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers Final Result:7 –0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 2 5.YouthCity Government will present the Youth State of the City Address. Minutes: Council Member Wharton welcomed the YouthCity Government. Hattie Wall (YouthCity Member?)expressed her reasoning for becoming involved in politics,efforts of learning law functions and history,and desire to help underserved populations with policies.Ms.Wall stated the policies that made the most impact were those that were made at the City and state level. Daffodil Buchert (YouthCity Member?)addressed policy issues important to her including the responsibility to work towards racial equality and equity,importance of police reform,and sexual education in schools. Gregoria Alegria (YouthCity Member?)read a letter from Mia Feldman (YouthCity member)addressing the opportunities YouthCity Government provided including affect on perspective,empowered open-minded conversations,and promoted mindset of standing for what youth believe.The letter included the value of service,unified voices, and the valuable role youth engaged as advocates for social justice.Ms.Alegria thanked those involved in YouthCity for the opportunities through the program,stated they spend a majority of their time discussing systemic racism,reported on a discussion titled “Black History is SLC History”moderated by State Representative Hollins that was a great success and encouraged the Council to continue to have discussions on systemic racism. Representative (FIRST NAME)Romero thanked Ms.Alegria for mentoring and working with the youth,shared her desire to continue working with the Council,reviewed the number of students on the council,and how current national activities impacted their lives. Council Member Fowler shared gratitude for those in attendance,expressing interest to be a resource for the program. Council Member Wharton asked if YouthCity Government reviewed HB 338 which would allow people 16 and older to vote in school board elections. Representative Romero stated one student was involved in the process but joined the discussion toward the end of the process.She explained that the focus was police reform and sex education. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items B1 &B2 will be heard as one public hearing MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 3 1.Grant Application:2022 Distracted Driving Prevention Program Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Utah Highway Safety Office.If awarded,this grant would fund the distracted driving enforcement and education overtime shifts for a twelve-month period beginning October 1,2021. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 20,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 4 2.Grant Application:2022 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Utah Highway Safety Office.If awarded,this grant would fund the crosswalk enforcement/education overtime and youth bicycle rodeo overtime for a twelve-month period beginning October 1,2021. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 20,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Rogers to close the Public Hearing and refer the items for future action. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers Final Result:7 –0 Pass Minutes: Council Member Wharton reviewed the rules of decorum. Sylvia Richards presented the Grant Application for the 2022 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Plan. Anne Charles spoke in opposition to the grant,suggesting the police issue tickets through a mailing process with the use of license plate data due to COVID transmission. Emily Alworth spoke in opposition to the grant,requesting the defunding of the police,similar community groups could use the money in better ways than the police. George Chapman spoke in support of the increase in funding for the police,stated distracting driving laws significantly increased situations that could escalate into critical incidents and urged the Council to not accept the grant application. C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 5 1.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.7 for Fiscal Year 2020-21 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document,for Fiscal Year 2020-21.The proposed amendment includes $6 million from the U.S. Treasury Department for rental assistance,funding to host the National League of Cities Conference in November 2021,and an outdoor business activity assistance pilot program,among many other items. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 16,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,March 16,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 6,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to adopt Ordinance 09 of 2021,amending the FY 2020-21 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document as shown below: A-1:National League of Cities Conference –($300,000 –Fund Balance) A-2:World Trade Center Membership ($50,000 –Fund Balance) A-3:Encampment Reestablishment Prevention ($650,000 –Fund Balance) A-4:Emergency Management Moved to Fire Department ($31,844 –Fund Balance) A-5:Outdoor Business Activity Assistance Program via the Economic Development Loan Fund ($100,000 –Fund Balance) A-6:Pulled Prior to Submission A-7:Pulled Prior to Submission A-8:U.S.Department of the Treasury;Emergency Rental Assistance ($6,067,033 –Misc.Grants) A-9:Move City GIS (Geographic Information Systems)Personnel to IMS GIS Division –Budget Neutral A-10:Inland Port Tax Revenue –Budget Neutral A-11:Employee Bonuses ($4,943,048 –Fund Balance) A-12:Withdrawn A-13:Police Contractual Costs –Salt Lake County ($218,858 –General Fund) A-14:Police Contractual Costs –Department of Natural Resources ($24,541 – General Fund) A-15:Police Contractual Costs –U.S.Marshal’s Office ($34,734 –General Fund) A-16:Police COVID Costs ($241,224 –Fund Balance) A-17:Police Protest Costs ($537,337 –Fund Balance) MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 6 A-18:Police Vice-Presidential Debate Cost Reimbursement ($209,521 Reimbursement) A-19:Central Plant Boilers ($1 million –Fund Balance and Rescope $1.5 million of FY21 CIP Facilities Capital Asset Replacement Program Funds) D-1:Remove CARES Grant Budget from Other Funds D-2:SLC Foundation Reappropriation ($3,000 –Non-Departmental) D-3:Social Worker Funding Back to Police (Housekeeping Adjustment) D-4:Transportation Budget Carryforward ($274,638) D-5:Transportation On-Demand Ride Services (Trips to Transit Pilot Program)($700,285 –Transit Key Routes and $99,715 from Transit Holding Account) D-6:Public Utilities Bond Proceeds and Debt Service ($1,002,936 –Water Fund) D-7:Interest Income on Bonding,GO Series 2019A ($281,866 –CIP Fund) D-8:911 Dispatch –UCA Reimbursement ($72,332 –General Fund) D-9 Pulled Prior to Submission D-10:Tree Removal Mitigation Funding ($520,150) D-11:Frequent Transit Network (FTN)CIP Funding Allocation E-1:Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),Utah State Division of Emergency Management, Pre-Disaster Mitigation ($3,768,091 –Misc.Grants) Council Consent Agenda No.3 G-1:Salt Lake Rotary Foundation Grant (YouthCity)($20,000 –Misc.Grants) G-2:Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ),State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) ($10,800 –Misc.Grants) G-3:Utah State Office of Education,Child and Adult Care Food Program - Youth After School Programs (YouthCity)($22,000 –Misc.Grants) G-4:Fairmont Park,School-Age Program Grant 2020,State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services (YouthCity –Fairmont Park)($78,400 –Misc.Grants) G-5:Liberty Park,School-Age Program Grant 2020,State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services (YouthCity –Liberty Park)($78,400 –Misc.Grants) G-6:Main Library,School-Age Program Grant 2020,State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services (YouthCity)($156,800 –Misc.Grants) G-7:Plaza 349,School-Age Program Grant 2020,State of Utah,Department of Workforce Services (YouthCity)($117,600 –Misc.Grants) G-8:Sorenson Center,School-Age Program Grant 2020,State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services (YouthCity)($156,800 –Misc.Grants) G-9:US Department of Justice,2020 Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)($300,713 –Misc. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 7 Grants) G-10:State of Utah,Utah Highway Safety Office,Distracted Driving Prevention Program ($12,000 – Misc.Grants) G-11:State of Utah,The Utah Highway Safety Office,Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program ($10,296 – Misc.Grants) Council Consent Agenda No.4 G-1:State of Utah,CCJJ (Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice), Jurisdictions with Halfway Houses and Parole Violator Centers Grant ($248,064 –Misc.Grants) G-2:Department of Workforce Services,Housing &Community Development Divisions,FY 21 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant Program ($160,100 –Misc.Grants) G-3:Utah State Utah Department of Health,Bureau of Emergency Medical Services ($6,275 –Misc. Grants) G-4:Utah Department of Natural Resources,Division of Forestry,Fire and State Lands,FY21 Jordan River Vegetation Improvement,2100 South Oxbow Restoration Project ($9,920 –Misc.Grants) AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers Final Result:7 –0 Pass 2.Resolution:One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant &Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would approve the Mayor’s funding recommendations and an appropriations resolution that would adopt the One-Year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2021-22.The plan includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)funding,HOME Investment Partnership Program funding,Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)funding, Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)funding.The resolution would approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 23,2021;Tuesday,April 6,2021;and Tuesday,April 13, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,March 16,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 6,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 8 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to approve an Resolution 14 of 2021,adopting the action plan as exhibit A and allocate the fund grant money. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers Final Result:7 –0 Pass Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to to reconsider the previous motion of approval of Resolution 14 of 2021.Council Member Fowler having voted on the prevailing side of the vote made the motion. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,James Rogers RECUSED:Andrew Johnston Final Result:6 –0 Pass Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to approve an Resolution 14 of 2021,appropriating the funding as outlined in Exhibit A, adopt the Action Plan,and allocate the fund grant money. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,James Rogers RECUSED:Andrew Johnston Final Result:6 –0 Pass Minutes: Following the Public Comment portion of the agenda,the original motion was reviewed due to a conflict of interest from Council Member Johnston due to his employment with Volunteers of America. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 9 3.Ordinance:Zoning Map Amendment located at approximately 706 to 740 West 900 South 710 to 739 West Genesee Avenue The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would rezone properties at 706 to 740 West 900 South and 710 to 739 West Genesee Avenue,including portions of two alleys,from M-1 (Light Manufacturing)to R-MU (Residential Mixed Use).The applicant intends to develop the remaining portion of the site with multi-family residential housing that is not currently permitted under the existing zoning designation.The developer has not proposed a specific development plan as part of the rezone application.The applicant also intends to renovate two vacant commercial buildings on the site for commercial uses. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.Other sections of Title 21A –Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition.Petition Nos.:PLNPCM2019-01137 and PLN2020-00442 FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 16,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 2,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Valdemoros to adopt Ordinance 10 of 2021 to amend the Zoning Map at the property located at approximately 706 to 740 West 900 South 710 to 739 West Genesee Avenue. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers Final Result:7 –0 Pass D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Minutes: Council Members thanked Council Member Johnston for his service on the Council and expressed their gratitude for his friendship and knowledge. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 10 2.Comments to the City Council.(Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing,as well as on any other City business.Comments are limited to two minutes.) Minutes: Susan Sandacks,Stephanie Finley,David Berg,Sarah Balland,and Anne Charles spoke in support of Ranked Choice Voting for the upcoming municipal election including summarized comments:strengthening voter rights,saving the City valuable funds,and the allowance for more choice in representation of leadership. Stephanie Finley expressed support to move funds from the police back to social services. Sarah Balland stated her opposition to the idle-free ordinance and its enforcement being predatory,urging the Council to not pass the ordinance. George Chapman stated voters would benefit with a primary in Ranked Choice Voting, providing more time for debates,and thanked Council Member Johnston for his service on the Council. Regan Duckworth thanked Council Member Johnston for his service on the City Council. Emily Alworth expressed appreciation for the YouthCity Government presentation, suggested the Council follow the advice of constituents about policing the homeless and eliminating the involvement of law enforcement and to create better,long-term solutions for access to resources. Anne Charles thanked the YouthCity Government,expressed opposition to the idle-free ordinance and stated more information would be helpful for clarifying the action of the Council during meetings. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 11 E.NEW BUSINESS: 1.Resolution:County Election Services Interlocal Agreement The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize approval of an election services interlocal agreement between the City and Salt Lake County. The agreement would provide vote-by-mail election services and potentially ranked choice voting services for the 2021 municipal election.The Council will separately consider and vote on a resolution for ranked choice voting. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Fowler to approve Resolution 10 of 2021,authorizing an election services interlocal agreement with Salt Lake County for the 2021 municipal election. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers Final Result:7 –0 Pass F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 12 1.Resolution:Interlocal Agreement for the 700 South Re-Construction Project Corridor Preservation Funds The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize approval of an interlocal cooperation agreement between the City and Salt Lake County for the transfer of County corridor preservation funds.The funds would be used for certain transportation projects within the County and the City relating to the re- construction of 700 South Street. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 13,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Fowler to adopt Resolution 11 of 2021.authorizing an interlocal agreement between Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County for 700 South reconstruction corridor preservation funds. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers Final Result:7 –0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 13 2.Resolution:Ranked Choice Voting Overview and Pilot Project The Council will consider approving a resolution to participate in the State- authorized Municipal Alternative Voting Method Pilot Program,otherwise known as single-winner ranked-choice voting or instant runoff voting.Discussion included how the ranked-choice voting process works,how the elections would be conducted,relevant bills in the Legislature’s 2021 General Session and public education efforts. Under ranked choice voting,voters rank the candidates in order of preference. Election equipment tabulates the preference numbers for each ballot.If none of the candidates receive more than 50%of the overall vote after the first round of tabulation,the candidate with the least number of votes is eliminated.The voters who had selected the eliminated candidate as their first choice would then have their votes tabulated for their second-choice candidate.This process of elimination continues until a candidate crosses the 50%threshold and is declared the winner. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021 and Tuesday,April 6,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan,seconded by Councilmember Valdemoros to approve Resolution 12 of 2021,notifying the Lieutenant Governor that Salt Lake City will participate in the instant runoff (Ranked Choice Voting)pilot program for the 2021 municipal election without a primary election. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano NAY:James Rogers Final Result:6 –1 Pass Minutes: Council Member Fowler expressed support of the action,including the desire to make this decision earlier;however the County did not have the adequate technology to support the Ranked Choice Voting method. Council Member Rogers shared his opposition to investing in the pilot project due to the number of Council Member seats up for election,the timing of the decision in an election year,and concern of the short time to educate and inform voters of the change. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 14 Council Member Johnston stated it was a difficult change this year,he was in favor and requested clarification on the motion to determine if there would be a primary election. Council Member Dugan stated his motion was for Ranked Choice Voting without a Primary election.Council Member Valdemoros confirmed her second to the motion. Lauren Shafer was recognized by the Chair to explain that opting into the Ranked Choice Voting project impacted: •Primary Election elimination (optional,but if held created a traditional voting method at the General Election as only two winners move from the Primary to the General) •General Election remained November 2 •Declaration of Candidacy moved from June to August •Clarification of the option for interested candidates to open a Campaign Finance Committee anytime during an election cycle to begin campaigning Council Member Rogers remained in opposition to the proposed involvement. Mayor Mendenhall was recognized by the Chair,and shared her thoughts on the decision of the Council to opt into the Ranked Choice Voting program without a Primary; as she believed there was value in the Primary timing and connection with community opportunities,concluding that removing the Primary was a mistake by the City Council although overall she supported the Ranked Choice Voting method. 3.Ordinance:Idling of Vehicles Ordinance Amendments The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend a section of the Salt Lake City Code related to idling of vehicles,penalty amendments,and exemption amendments.The proposed changes include updated language for idling restriction exceptions,such as during extreme temperatures,operation of equipment in emergency and law enforcement vehicles,or stopped for traffic control devices.The proposed update would also allow the City to issue a citation after only one warning.The amendment retains exceptions for health and safety. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 6,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to adopt MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 15 Ordinance 11 of 2021,amending the section of the Salt Lake City Code relating to idling of Vehicles Ordinance penalty and exception amendments. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers Final Result:7 –0 Pass 4.Resolution:Recycling Market Development Zone Program The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would approve the Sustainability Department’s application to the Recycling Market Development Zone Program.The City has participated in the program since 2010.The State program assists qualifying businesses that use or produce recycled materials in their manufacturing operations,or compost,by providing State income tax credits.Local government entities must apply to participate in the State’s program every five years so qualifying businesses within their jurisdictions can access the tax credits.The City’s application limits its program to businesses in the M-1 and M-2 zoning designations and does not alter what is currently allowed by zoning regulations. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 13,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 16 Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Rogers to adopt Resolution 13 of 2021,authorizing the Sustainability Department’s application to the Recycling Market Development Zone Program. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers Final Result:7 –0 Pass 5.Ordinance:Amending the Annual Compensation Plan for Non- Represented Employees The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Fiscal Year 2021 Annual Compensation Plan Appendix B for appointed employees.This would add six new appointed positions,modify the job title and increase the pay grade of one existing appointed position,and increase the pay grades associated with three other existing appointed positions. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 16,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Fowler to MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 17 adopt Ordinance 12 of 2021,amending the Fiscal Year 2021 Annual Compensation Plan Appendix B for appointed employees and non- represented employees. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers Final Result:7 –0 Pass G.CONSENT: 1.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.8 for Fiscal Year 2020-21 The Council will set the date of Tuesday,May 4,2021 at 7 p.m.to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document,for Fiscal Year 2020-21.The proposed amendment includes funding for Crisis Intervention Team (CIT)training certifications and re-certifications,hiring a class of lateral police officers,and a donation to create a shelter for low-income seniors and veterans, among other changes. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,May 4,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,May 18,2021 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 18 Staff Recommendation -Set date. 2.Board Appointment:Library Board –Ronald McClain The Council will consider appointing Ronald McClain to the Library Board for a term ending June 30,2024. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 3.Board Appointment:Library Board –Daniel Cairo The Council will consider approving the appointment of Daniel Cairo to the Library Board for a term ending June 30,2024. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 4.Board Appointment:Parks,Natural Lands,Urban Forestry and Trails (PNUT)Advisory Board –Chad Whittaker The Council will consider approving the appointment of Chad Whittaker to the PNUT Board for a term ending April 20,2024. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 19 FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 5.Board Appointment:Parks,Natural Lands,Urban Forestry and Trails (PNUT)Advisory Board –Melanie Pehrson The Council will consider approving the appointment of Melanie Pehrson to the PNUT Board for a term ending April 20,2024. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 6.Board Appointment:Parks,Natural Lands,Urban Forestry,and Trails Advisory Board –Philip Carroll The Council will consider appointing Phillip Carroll to the PNUT Board for a term ending April 20,2024. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 7.Ordinances relating to Fiscal Year 2021-22 City Budget,including the budget for the Library Fund The Council will set the dates of Tuesday,May 18,2021 and Tuesday,June 1,2021 at 7 p.m.to accept public comment regarding an ordinance adopting the final MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 20 budget and the employment staffing document for Salt Lake City,Utah and related ordinances for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,May 18,2021 and Tuesday, June 1,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Staff Recommendation -Set date. The Council will consider a motion to adjourn as the City Council and to convene as the Board of Directors of the Local Building Authority Motion: Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Fowler to approve the Consent Agenda. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers Final Result:7 –0 Pass 8.Resolution:Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Board will set the dates of Tuesday,May 18,2021 and Tuesday,June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.to accept public comment and consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City,Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,May 18,2021 and Tuesday, June 1,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Staff Recommendation -Set date. Motion: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 21 Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Fowler to as the Local Building Authority,approve the dates specified for the public comment and consider approving Resolution xx of 2021 adopting the final budget for the Capital Projects Funds of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City,Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers Final Result:7 –0 Pass H.ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 8:41 pm Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 22 §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday,April 20,2021. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,April 20,2021 23 PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority,the Redevelopment Agency,and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday,June 8,2021 in an Electronic Meeting, pursuant to the Redevelopment Agency and City Council Chairs’determination. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer; Danny Walz,Redevelopment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,DeeDee Robinson –Minutes and Records Clerk,Robert Nutzman –Administrative Assistant,Russell Weeks –Senior Advisor,Taylor Hill –Council Staff Councilmember Amy Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meeting. Minutes: Councilmember Fowler welcomed attendees and began the meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. Minutes: A moment of silence was held while the American Flag and Pledge text was displayed on the screen. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. Minutes: Councilmember Fowler welcomed attendees to the meeting and gave a brief discription of the meeting rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of Tuesday,October 13,2020 and Tuesday,October 20,2020. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to Motion to Approve the work session meeting minutes of Tuesday,October 13, 2020 and Tuesday,October 20,2020. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,James Rogers,Dennis Faris ABSENT:Chris Wharton Final Result:6 –0 Pass B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1.Ordinance:Library Budget Amendment No.2 for Fiscal Year 2020-21 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the budget for the Library Fund for Fiscal Year 2020-21.Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets,including proposed project additions and modifications.The proposed amendment includes a request to increase the Library’s General Fund budget to account for pass-through property tax revenue collected by Salt Lake County which goes directly to the Utah Inland Port Authority and the Convention Facility. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,May 18,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,May 18,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,June 8,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 15,2021 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Russell Weeks reviewed the proposed ordinance for the Library Budget Amendment No.2 for fiscal year 2020-21. Annie Charles expressed concern over the proposed budget amendment specifically funding the inland port and convention hotel. Emily Alworth spoke in opposition to funding earmarked for the library being used for the inland port and asked Council to defund the police. Hailey Lumber suggested increasing the library funds to serve the community. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to Close the Public Hearing and consider the ordinance at a future meeting. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,James Rogers,Dennis Faris Final Result:7 –0 Pass C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: NONE. D.COMMENTS: NONE. E.NEW BUSINESS: NONE. F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE. G.CONSENT: 1.Resolution:Capital Improvement Program Projects The Council will set the dates of Tuesday,July 13,2021 at 7 p.m.and Tuesday, August 17,2021 at 6 p.m.to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program, which involves the construction,purchase or renovation of buildings,parks,streets or other physical structures.Generally,projects have a useful life of five or more years and cost $50,000 or more.The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in the annual budget process,while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same year. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,June 1,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,July 13,2021 at 7 p.m.and Tuesday,August 17,2021 at 6 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation -Set date. 2.Ordinance:Rezone at Approximately 860 and 868 East 3rd Avenue The Council will set the date of July 13,2021 at 7 p.m.to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map for property at 860 and 868 East 3rd Avenue.The proposal would rezone the parcels from CN (Neighborhood Commercial District)and SR-1A (Special Development Pattern Residential District)to R-MU-35 (Residential/Mixed Use District).The applicant would like to build a multi-family development on the lots,however the request is not tied to a development proposal.The properties are located within the Avenues Local Historic District and any demolition or construction must be approved by the Historic Landmark Commission.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.Other sections of Title 21A –Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.:PLNPCM2020-00703 FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,July 13,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,July 20,2021 Staff Recommendation -Set date. 3.Board Appointment:Police Civilian Review Board (PCRB)–Justin Rodriguez The Council will consider approving the appointment of Justin Rodriguez to the PCRB for a term ending September 2,2024. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 4.Board Appointment:Police Civilian Review Board (PCRB)–Raheem Bennett The Council will consider approving the appointment of Raheem Bennett to the PCRB for a term ending September 2,2024. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 5.Board Appointment:Housing Authority of Salt Lake City –Tina Padilla The Council will consider approving the appointment of Tina Padilla to the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City for a term ending June 8,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 6.Board Appointment:Housing Authority of Salt Lake City –Amy Hawkins The Council will consider approving the appointment of Amy Hawkins to the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City for a term ending June 8,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 7.Board Reappointment:Planning Commission –Brenda Scheer The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Brenda Scheer to the Planning Commission for a term ending June 8,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 8.Board Reappointment:Bicycle Advisory Committee –Joshua Poppel The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Joshua Poppel to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending June 8,2024. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 9.Board Reappointment:Housing Authority of Salt Lake City –Cindy Gust-Jenson The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Cindy Gust-Jenson to the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City for a term ending June 8,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 8,2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Faris to approve the consent agenda except item G-3 as the interview had not taken place. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result:7 –0 Pass H.ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:25 pm Minutes Approved: _______________________________ Local Building Authority and City Council Chair _______________________________ Redevelopment Agency Chair _______________________________ City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitute the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday,June 8,2021. PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Formal Session on Tuesday,August 17,2021 in an Electronic Meeting,pursuant to the Chair’s determination. The following Council Members were present: Dennis Faris,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,Robert Nutzman –Administrative Assistant Council Member Amy Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17,2021 1 A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meeting. Minutes: Council Member Fowler welcomed everyone to the meeting and reviewed the purpose for the Limited Formal Meeting. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17,2021 2 1.Ordinances:Truth-in-Taxation Hearing for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting one or more ordinances adopting the final rate of tax levy,for all City funds including the Library Fund,in an amount greater than the Certified Tax Rate,upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and adopting the final budget,including the Library Budget,for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,July 13,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,August 17,2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 17,2021 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: George Chapman spoke in opposition to the Ordinance,any form of tax increase and the public should know where the additional money was to be spent. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Mano,seconded by Councilmember Wharton to close the Public Hearing and and adopt Ordinance 34 of 2021,Truth-in-Taxation Hearing for Fiscal Year 2021-22 establishing the final rate of tax levy,including the final levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City ,made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-2022,and ratify the budget as adopted by the City Council in June. AYE:Dennis Faris,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton Final Result:7 –0 Pass C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: D.COMMENTS: E.NEW BUSINESS: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17,2021 3 F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: G.CONSENT: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17,2021 4 H.ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:07 pm Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday,August 17,2021. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17,2021 5 PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Formal Session on Tuesday,January 18, 2022 in an electronic meeting pursuant to the Chair’s determination. The following Council Members were present: Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy The following Council Members were absent: Ana Valdemoros Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,Amanda Lau –Public Engagement &Communication Specialist,Ben Luedtke –Senior Public Policy Analyst,Sylvia Richards –Public Policy Analyst,Thais Stewart –Deputy City Recorder,Michelle Barney –Minutes &Records Clerk,Isaac Canedo –Council Staff,Beatrix Sieger –Council Staff,Taylor Hill –City Council Staff,Delaney Sillman –Council Staff Council Member Dan Dugan presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:15 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 1 A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Dan Dugan will conduct the formal meeting. Minutes: Council Member Dugan welcomed attendees to the meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. Minutes: A moment of silence was held while the Pledge of Allegiance was recited and the American Flag and Pledge text was displayed on the screen. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. Minutes: Council Member Dugan reviewed the rules of decorum. 4.The Council will approve the work session and formal meeting minutes of Tuesday, September 21,2021. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Mano to approve the Work Session and Formal meeting minutes from Tuesday,September 21,2021. AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result:6 –0 Pass B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items B1-B3 will be heard as one public hearing MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 2 1.Grant Application:Salt Lake County Corridor Preservation Fund Grant –400 South Between 550 West and 600 West The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Transportation to the Salt Lake County.If awarded,this grant would fund the purchase 0.174 acres of property on 400 South between 550 West and 600 West to preserve a full block as a transit corridor.A second 0.174 acre parcel of property owned by the RDA (immediately adjacent to the first)will be contributed to the project to secure the necessary right-of-way. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,January 18,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda. 2.Grant Application:Marathon Petroleum Foundation Thriving Communities –YouthCity Transportation Solutions Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Marathon Petroleum Foundation.If awarded,this grant would fund the purchase of two new 14-passenger vans to transport youth participants from neighborhood elementary schools to the YouthCity Northwest Recreation Center for afterschool programming. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,January 18,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 3 3.Grant Application:Mental Health First Responders Grant –Increased Capacity for Employee Assistance Program The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Human Resources to the Utah Department of Human Services.If awarded,this grant would be used to expand the capacity of the City’s existing EAP program targeting first responders in a one-year pilot program.The two clinicians currently under contract with ComPsych will increase their hours of availability to provide onsite,in person,phone,and virtual counseling,particularly emergency services for individuals who may be in crisis.The total hours will increase 815 hours over the course of the one-year pilot program. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,January 18,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda. Minutes: Sylvia Richards presented the grants:Salt Lake County Corridor Preservation Fund Grant for a transit corridor at approximately 400 South between 550 West and 600 West, Marathon Petroleum Foundation Thriving Communities YouthCity Transportation Solutions Grant,and Mental Health First Responders Grant for Increased Capacity for Employee Assistance Program. George Chapman spoke against the Salt Lake County Corridor Preservation Fund Grant for 400 South,what it implied and stated there were better ways to use the funding in the City. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Puy,seconded by Councilmember Fowler to close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-3 to a future Consent Agenda for action. AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler, Alejandro Puy ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result:6 –0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 4 4.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document,for Fiscal Year 2021-22.Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications.The proposed amendment includes funding for low-income senior and veteran transitional housing and public safety overtime in neighborhoods hosting homeless shelters, among other items. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 4,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,December 14,2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,January 4,2022 and Tuesday, January 18,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: George Chapman suggested the funding should go to policing the homeless shelters, and drug dogs should be returned to use in the City. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Petro- Eschler to close the Public Hearing and adopt an Ordinance 2 of 2022, amending the FY 2021-22 final budget of Salt Lake City only for items as shown on the motion sheet. I-3:Rescope FY22 CIP Funds for Tennis Improvements at a New Location from Wasatch Hills Tennis Center to Liberty Park Tennis Center ($400,000 in CIP Fund) AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler, Alejandro Puy ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result:6 –0 Pass C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 5 NONE. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 6 D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Minutes: Council Member Wharton thanked the Mayor for activating the Emergency Mask Mandate to protect the citizens of Salt Lake City. 2.Comments to the City Council.(Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing,as well as on any other City business.Comments are limited to two minutes.) Minutes: Polly Hart reviewed the issues with the Foothill Trails Plan,previously paused to re-prioritize the protection of the environment;however,Phase 2 continued and the plan still needed review and the Foothill trails needed protection. Janet Hemming asked the Council to stop the disappearance of the Miller Bird Refuge in Yalecrest,suggested a one year moratorium,stop cutting trees and using chemicals,fix the sprinkler system,and protect the area and save it for the future. Demetri Vallejos spoke to the decriminalization of plants and fungi in reference to HB 167,wanted to work with the Council on legalizing the use of regulated plants and fungi for medical and healing purposes. Hilary Jacobs spoke to the need to protect the Foothill Trails,the criteria for funding the development of the trails and lack of Public Lands staff knowledge in complying with the regulations for developing the area. George Chapman spoke to the need to recount the number of residents in District 2,stop luxury apartment developments,stop cutting of trees and using herbicides in Miller park,and update policies regarding police rifle use. E.NEW BUSINESS: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 7 1.Resolution:Appointment to the Utah Inland Port Authority Board The Council will consider approving a resolution confirming a Council Member appointment to the Utah Inland Port Authority Board. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 11,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 18,2022 Staff Recommendation -Suspend the rules and adopt. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Puy to approve Resolution 1 of 2022,appointing Council Member Victoria Petro- Eschler to the Utah Inland Port Authority Board. AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler, Alejandro Puy ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result:6 –0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 8 F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Resolution:Amending Resolution No.31 of 2021 relating to a State Infrastructure Bank Loan to the City The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would amend resolution No. 31 of 2021,relating to a State Infrastructure (SIB)loan to the City from UDOT,to state and clarify that the loan will be payable from the City’s Innkeepers Tax rather than from sales tax revenue;and providing for related matters. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 4,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 18,2022 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Mano to adopt Resolution 2 of 2022,Amending Resolution 31 of 2021 relating to the State Infrastructure Bank Loan. AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler, Alejandro Puy ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result:6 –0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 9 2.Ordinance:Establishing the City's Designated Water Service Area The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would establish the City’s designated water service area.The proposed water service area is congruent with existing and historical service commitments.The proposal is the result of a new requirement cascading from Utah's 2020 constitutional amendment D,which passed. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 11,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 18,2022 Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Petro- Eschler to adopt Ordinance 3 of 2022,establishing the Salt Lake City Designated Water Service Area and approve the map that identifies the area. AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler, Alejandro Puy ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result:6 –0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 10 G.CONSENT: 1.Board Appointment:Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs (CDCIP)Advisory Board –Richard Nazzaro The Council will consider approving the appointment of Richard Nazzaro to the CDCIP Advisory Board for a term ending June 2,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 18,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 18,2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 2.Board Appointment:Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs (CDCIP)Advisory Board –Jenny Bonk The Council will consider approving the appointment of Jenny Bonk to the CDCIP Advisory Board for a term ending June 2,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 18,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 18,2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 11 3.Board Appointment:Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs (CDCIP)Advisory Board –Jacob Skog The Council will consider approving the appointment of Jacob Skog to the CDCIP Advisory Board for a term ending June 2,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 18,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 18,2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Mano,seconded by Councilmember Fowler to approved the consent agenda AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result:6 –0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 12 H.ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:57 pm Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday,January 18,2022. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,January 18,2022 13 PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Formal Session on Tuesday, February 1,2022 in an electronic meeting pursuant to the Chair’s determination. The following Council Members were present: Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy The following Council Members were absent: Ana Valdemoros Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,Mary Beth Thompson –Chief Financial Officer,Thais Stewart –Deputy City Recorder,Michelle Barney –Minutes & Records Clerk,Isaac Canedo –Council Staff,Taylor Hill –City Council Staff,Nick Tarbet –Public Policy Analyst,Delaney Sillman –Council Staff Council Member Daniel Dugan presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 1 A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Dan Dugan will conduct the formal meeting. Minutes: Council Member Dugan welcomed all in attendance to the meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. Minutes: A moment of silence was held while the Pledge of Allegiance was recited and the American Flag and Pledge text was displayed on the screen. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. Minutes: Council Member Dugan reviewed the rules of decorum. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of March 2,2021 as well as the formal meeting minutes of March 2,2021,March 16,2021,and January 4,2022. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Puy,seconded by Councilmember Mano to approve the Work Session minutes from March 2,2021 and Formal Meeting Minutes from March 2,2021,March 16,2021 and January 4, 2022. AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result:6 –0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 2 5.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall celebrating the 20th anniversary of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games, and expressing the City’s support and goals for hosting a future games beneficial to the community. Minutes: Council Member Mano read the resolution. Catherine Raney,(Olympic Committee)thanked the Council for their support of the Committee and expressed excitement to bringing the Olympics back to Salt Lake City. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Mano to adopt Resolution 3 of 2022,adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall celebrating the 20th anniversary of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games,and expressing the City’s support and goals for hosting a future games beneficial to the community. AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result:6 –0 Pass B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 3 1.Ordinance:Amendment to Require Notice for Permits to Work in the Public Way The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would require notice for permits to work in the public way.The Council has requested that Engineering codify and expand the policy that adjacent property owners are notified of work being performed in the right of way. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,January 12,2021;Tuesday,February 9,2021;Tuesday, January 11,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,December 8,2020 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,January 19,2021 and Tuesday, February 1,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Nick Tarbet presented the ordinance for an amendment to require notice for permits to work in the public way. Melissa Reagan (Verizon Wireless)spoke in support of the ordinance,would like clarity on who was responsible to provide the notice,if the applicant was to provide the ordinance then would ask for the notice to be sent at the time of construction. Maclain Drake (First Digital Telecom)agreed with the comments from Verizon Wireless regarding notifications,spoke in support of the ordinance. Nigel Swaby spoke in support of the ordinance,property owners should be notified if there were proposed changes for the park strip to ensure landscaping was accommodated. Cindy Cromer stated the the property was public and the City should be responsible to notify the property owners when installations were being made and gave an experience working with Google Fiber,supported the proposed ordinance. Mark Soltes (Lumin/Century Link)reviewed proposed changes that were sent to staff, supported the ordinance with the changes stated by others. Curtis Cox expressed concern over the timeframe as to when the notice would be provided,notice would be most effective 72-48 hours in advance of construction and the need to provide the notice at the time above ground work was conducted versus underground construction. Council Member Wharton conveyed concern that further delay may occur,noting his MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 4 surprise the City didn’t have anything in place when his question was asked months ago and desired the wait be minimal for the ordinance to be returned to the Council. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Puy to close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler, Alejandro Puy ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result:6 –0 Pass C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: NONE. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 5 D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Minutes: No questions at this time. 2.Comments to the City Council.(Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing,as well as on any other City business.Comments are limited to two minutes.) Minutes: Keiko Jones requested a moratorium for all multiple unit dwellings;Madison Park closure expired in five days and would not be a benefit to open the park,the park needed to remain closed until improvements were made,expressed excitement about having the Olympics here again. Nigel Swaby spoke to the need for continued closure to Madison Park,closure being a great benefit to the area,police cameras had been helpful,park should remain closed for another 60 days until further mitigation aspects were provided. E.NEW BUSINESS: NONE. F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 6 G.CONSENT: 1.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will set the date of Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document,for Fiscal Year 2021-22.Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets,including proposed project additions and modifications.The proposed amendment includes funding for new Arts Council employees,adding a second sergeant to the Special Victims Unit,and additional Emergency Rental Assistance Program funding from the Federal Government, among other items. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 Staff Recommendation -Set date. Minutes: 2.Resolution:Art Barn Public Benefits Analysis The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 1,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the waiver of lease fees for the use of the Art Barn by the Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation.The Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation &Arts Council Division is requesting to continue utilizing 54 Finch Lane,or the “Art Barn”as the administrative headquarters,housing 6.5 Arts Council FTEs and multiple seasonal and part-time employees,as well as to provide a home for the Finch Lane Art Gallery and its numerous exhibitions. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 7 FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 1,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Staff Recommendation -Set date. 3.Ordinance:Rezone and Master Plan Amendment for the Former Fire Station No.3 Property The Council will set the date of Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 1085 East Simpson Avenue,1095 East Simpson Avenue,1097 East Simpson Avenue,and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive to rezone those properties from PL (Public Lands)District to CSHBD1 (Sugar House Business District),and would amend the Sugar House Community Plan Future Land Use Map.The purpose for the proposal is to consolidate the subject properties with the property to the east for future development.Both properties are owned by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City.There is no development proposal associated with this request.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-01007 and PLNPCM2021-00914 FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 Staff Recommendation -Set date. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 8 4.Ordinance:Rezone at 1193 West California Avenue The Council will set the date of February 15,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property located at approximately 1193 West California Avenue from R-1/7,000 (Single Family Residential District)to R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential District).If approved,the property owner intends to subdivide the property, remove the existing home and construct two new homes,potentially with attached ADUs.The owner anticipates retaining ownership of both properties.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-00709 FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 Staff Recommendation -Set date. 5.Ordinance:Rezone at 2060 North 2200 West The Council will set the date of Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map pertaining to one parcel of property located at 2060 North 2200 West Street to rezone the property from AG-2 (Agricultural District)to M-1 (Light Manufacturing District).The amendment is to implement the master plan zoning and to accommodate future commercial land uses.No specific site development proposal has been submitted at this time.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-00575 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 9 FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 Staff Recommendation -Set date. 6.Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.4)Associated with BAM No.6 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.4) for Fiscal Year 2021-22 Associated with Budget Amendment No.6. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 7.Board Appointment:Arts Council Board –Richard Taylor The Council will consider approving the appointment of Richard Taylor to the Arts Council Board for a term ending February 1,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 8.Board Appointment:Arts Council Board –Ayanna Allen The Council will consider approving the appointment of Ayanna Allen to the Arts Council Board for a term ending February 1,2025. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 10 FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Mano to approve the consent agenda. AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler, Alejandro Puy ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result:6 –0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 11 H.ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:40 pm Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday,February 1,2022. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,February 1,2022 12 PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in an Annual Retreat/Workshop on Tuesday, January 25,2022,in an electronic meeting pursuant to Chair’s determination. The following Council Members were present: Victoria Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy,Chris Wharton,Ana Valdemoros,Darin Mano,Daniel Dugan,Amy Fowler Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: DeeDee Robinson –Minutes &Records Clerk,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,Taylor Hill –Attendee Council Member Dugan presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 11:10 am. City Council Retreat Minutes: Council Members Dugan and Mano welcomed those present and outlined the Council Retreat details. Ice Breaker Activity –Council Members engaged in an ice breaker activity. Interests &Priorities Council Member Fowler provided Citywide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •Modifying/expanding the City’s mobile business ordinance to include other businesses (other than food) •Having an ordinance in place like the the emergency land use ordinance for warming/cooling centers (code blue/code red ordinances) •Enforcement of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)being used as Airbnb (needing more strict enforcement) •Net-zero goals for the City •Criminal justice reform/police reform/reducing recidivism (looking at treatment within the programs,revisit City criminal code –removing non-criminal items) •Completion of pending ordinances (items/topics not dependent on funding/City budget) •Policies/Ordinances/Budget research on police reform (continuing the work) District wide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •Working with private partnerships for boys/girls club and restoration of courts (by the S Line) •Neighborhood branding;tool kits for creating neighborhood identity (preservation of history/identity) •Transportation/Street improvements and design (900 East)–including expansion of the S Line going east •Encourage wider use of public transportation and increasing walkability (better pedestrian/ADA access on sidewalks) •Forest Dale Golf course;receiving historic designation Last thoughts:Virtual meetings were not impeding the connection of this Council,this discussion allowed for Council Members to find commonalities across the City,expressed appreciation for the opportunity to know that other districts faced similar issues to her own,and thanked Council Staff and Mayor for their support. Council Member Wharton provided Citywide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •Modifying Xeriscaping ordinances/percentage of yard space requiring plants –wanting to encourage more native plants/eco-friendly yards and allowing faux terf/grass •Expanding the Park Ranger and Non-Police enforcement of traffic/other issues (moving the issue forward) •Stricter enforcement of noise for hospitals/clinics (lower decibel levels) •Fairpark Market –making steps forward this year (tearing down wall for entrance, progress with building,etc.) •Support for a LGBTQ focused housing development for seniors and veterans through the City Housing Authority •New/additional signage/historic markers in areas of the City noting important areas/structures and associated funding/approval/vendor selection suggestions. •Amending downtown zoning to allow for wineries and distilleries District wide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •More oversight/public hearings for Trails Master Plan (needed improvements,corrections, etc.) •Utilizing CARES funding for cemetery from the State (matching funds with the City –storm drainage for the cemetery) •Enforcement of traffic calming,exhibition driving/modified exhaust vehicles,large amount of industrial traffic cutting through neighborhoods •Enforcement on nuisance issues on City trails;human waste,parties,drug paraphernalia, firing of guns,illegal fires,drug/alcohol use,etc. •Wasatch Plunge Building;finding ways to save the building from deterioration (important City asset) Last thoughts:Expressed appreciation for the discussion,was excited to be working with all Council Members and the Mayor in accomplishing goals,and appreciation for Council Staff for all their work bringing forth issues that concerned the Council. Council Member Valdemoros provided Citywide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •City real estate assets;pushing for retention (reuse/improvement),for example the old Public Safety Building could be re-purposed for housing.(Important for the City and the budget) •Resource Center activity;more awareness/understanding of operations •Preparing the City for the Olympics (infrastructure,resources,etc.). •Traffic calming,zoning ordinance progress,funding for City projects (how to create revenue). •Being accountable for the priorities mentioned today (understanding commonalities,what changes could be made quickly/without funding/with funding/etc.) District wide topics/priorities,including (summary): •Crime in the City/public safety,creating a safe/clean/friendly downtown •Shelters;exploring if the City should allow more,more involvement with mental health issues (assisting vulnerable populations)and providing safety •Streets/curbing in disrepair;needing paint,employing volunteer groups to help beautify the City •Assessments on vacant buildings needed (contributing to graffiti,vagrancy,eyesores) –assist with funding to repair properties and enforcement •City real estate assets;consider leasing,preserving for future generations •Supporting the Farmers Market in cooperation with the State Last thoughts:thanked fellow Council Members for sharing their priorities and the Mayor for her involvement –budget was always in mind when considering needs.Wishes for serious investment in bringing order back to the downtown area. Council Member Mano provided Citywide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •Completion of all pending zoning ordinances (needing to be voted on and passed), amending of all Residential Multi-Family (RMF)zones,funding a Citywide re-zoning effort for equity •Traffic Calming –supportive of 20 mph default speed limit in the City,Streets Master Plan, and low cost street safety options •Procurement Ordinance;rework for hiring outside contractors (consideration of local,and minority-owned businesses)and utilizing apprenticeship programs in the City •Focus on historic preservation (Warm Springs Plunge,Leonardo,old Public Safety Building,etc.)and strategies for assisting with preservation •Air quality/environment goals;high water user fees,trash collection fee changes,zero fare for all public transit,preservation of the Great Salt Lake,fixed rail street car system (getting around the city w/out a car) •Equity Goals:supporting the Racial Equity in Policing (REP)Commission,specific planning on equity,the City being seen as a leader in adopting Building Code amendments to support gender neutral restrooms for use in existing public buildings and all newly built buildings (currently illegal within the Building Code)–supporting real change to create equity •Projects of high interest;Japan Town Street,Depot District,Fleet Block,Glendale Water Park,and others District wide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •Ballpark Station Area Plan completion,adopting/rezoning State Street/Ball Park corridors to match the goals within that plan •Reallocate funding for alleyway maintenance and repaving (along with establishing longer- term priorities),potential for developing housing fronting alleyways,or longer public ways, courts,etc. •Supporting 900 S.business corridor (consider a Community Redevelopment Area [CRA] for the area),placemaking element for Harvey Milk Blvd,campus move for Public Utilities, redesign State Street and Main Street to be more pedestrian friendly •Liberty Park;use of the Park Ranger program,finding ways for saving the Seven Canyons Fountain Last thoughts:Alignment found with other Council Members,hoping to bring forward top priorities found during this session and push forward with them. Council Member Petro-Eschler provided Citywide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •Anti-gentrification efforts were a top priority •Ordinances to be evaluated:Single Room Occupancy (SRO),parking,and housing mitigation •Optimize Redevelopment Agency (RDA)funding for family-sized consideration •Homelessness –long term planning,immediate short term responses,no comprehensive plan inviting investment/partnership,clear interventions:chaos containment,protected camping,no street RV camping,homeless shelter zoning,improve partner relationships •Public Safety;traffic calming measures,be responsive to REP,supporting seismic preparedness/Fix the Bricks programming •Food deserts;cautious about food access and price point diversity,ethnic food accessibility •Evaluation of the distribution of funding for equity (CIP,EDLF) •Early childhood needs –needing robust conversation about sustainability of the program, ensuring investment went to actual needs •Maintaining City presence on Inland Port;protecting constituents,economic development, etc. •Public comments for Council meetings;when its received,how its received and interaction with the public District wide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •Homelessness crisis;unsheltered and housed individuals,promoting homeownership, looking at good landlord ordinance for any revisions •Economic Development;apprenticeship utilization,offering support for international market,establish voice/presence for Rocky Mountain Power development •Sound pollution;major highways nearby,advocating for change for more sound mitigation •Sidewalks;in disrepair and needing attention •Digital divide issues;incentivize pricepoint with multiple levels of service with providers •Lighting was needed in Riverside Park •Investment in golf courses;green space was invaluable,could be rented out for public use to draw income,serving an important social/community function Last thoughts:Expressed appreciation for the opportunity to elevate priorities,thanked Council and Staff for their collaboration and providing the necessary tools to be successful,and expressed appreciation for working with a Council that helped her be confident. Council Member Puy provided Citywide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •Housing;inclusionary zoning,Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs);removing barriers (pre- approved architectural designs),down payment assistance funding,etc. •Zoning issues;R-2 zoning having limits on building area,corrections to ordinances needed •Speeding/traffic and safety issues;support for traffic calming/cameras,deterring violence in the City •Spring Cleaning for the westside –junk piling on the roads (equity issue),update vegetation ordinance for park strips/front lawns,utilize apprenticeship programs, prioritize and support City/Utah based companies •Homelessness;find solutions for encampments,use of hotels being problematic,RV lots (instead of City streets) •More diversity was needed in the Council Chambers;additional historical City figures added to the walls and technology updated for hybrid meetings •Relationship building with local legislators District wide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •Trains;cameras on train crossings/intersections were needed,vehicles were crossing under train arms •Sidewalk repair funding;equity issues on the westside,creation of a fund for assistance •Safety/Crime;high amount of drugs and crime in the North Temple area,looking for solutions (more cameras),and more support for the international market •Speeding;finding ways to slow down traffic •City Council Meetings;more meetings located on the westside,bringing government closer to the community,encourage more participation for westside representatives on City boards •Spring cleaning/illegal dumping;needing better public engagement Last thoughts:Expressed appreciation for the opportunity;gained an understanding of other issues in the City,shared goals,and alignment with other district’s goals.Expressed interest in the Council considering the westside and the issues it faced. Note:A break was taken at 12:40 pm.The retreat reconvened at 12:55 pm. Council Member Dugan provided Citywide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •City focus on impact of the Inland Port (air quality,environmental impact study, infrastructure,transportation,etc.) •Rio Grande Train Box;feasibility study was needed •Completion of pending zoning ordinances/amendments •Equity;continuing to move forward on recommendations from REP •Transportation;alternative modes needed,higher use of Public Transportation •Water conservation;continuing to press on improving Citywide consumption •Street repairs needed focus,utilize bond funds,keep it moving forward District wide topics/priorities,including (in summary): •Foothill intersections/crosswalks;high traffic area (street calming/traffic a big concern) •Research Park;increasing traffic,needing a transit hub,ensure environmental impact was mitigated •Miller Park;completion of CIP process •Bonneville shoreline bike trail (CIP);continue discussions and push for completion of the trail •Traffic was a big issue;alternative transportation,street calming,etc. Last thoughts:Expressed gratitude to Council Members for engaging and taking the time to reflect on Citywide issues as well as their respective district’s issues,thanked the Mayor for her participation,and thanked Council Staff. Mayor Mendenhall thanked the Council for providing their priorities,noting many aligned with her own priorities,and thanked the Council for the combined participation. Council Member Dugan described the next steps that would include the information provided today and plans to meet again to address the top priorities. Meeting adjourned at:2:07 pm. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday,January 25,2022. PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met for the Oath of Office Ceremony on Monday, January 3,2022. The following Council Members were present: Victoria Petro-Eschler,Dennis Faris,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano, Ana Valdemoros Upon taking the Oath of Office Alejandro Puy took his seat on the Council. Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Linda Sanchez –City Council Staff,Michelle Barney –Minutes &Records Clerk,Cindy Lou Trishman –Salt Lake City Recorder,DeeDee Robinson –Minutes and Records Clerk,Keith Reynolds –Deputy City Recorder,Thais Stewart –Minutes &Records Clerk,Lauren Shafer –Deputy City Recorder,Sylvia Richards –Attendee,Jan Aramaki –Attendee Council Member Amy Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at noon. Opening Ceremony Minutes: Call to Order Council Member Amy Fowler welcomed those in attendance,reviewed the purpose of the ceremony,and read the names of the five individuals being sworn in as members of the City Council. Flag Ceremony Salt Lake City Police Department Motor Squad conducted the flag ceremony. National Anthem The National Anthem was performed by Liliena Pupu’a from the Tongan-American Free Wesleyan Church. Musical Number A musical number was performed by Salty Cricket Students titled “Cielito Lindo”. Administration of the Oath of Office and Remarks Council Member Victoria Petro-Eschler was joined by her children at the podium. Notary Public,Alejandro Puy administered the Oath of Office for Council Member Victoria Petro-Eschler. Council Member Victoria Petro-Eschler discussed her educational background,thanked individuals that had helped and lead her to become a Council Member and achieve her goals. Council Member Petro-Eschler expressed her excitement to serve on the City Council as part of the most diverse City Council in Utah’s history. Council Member-Elect Alejandro Puy was joined by his dog Petunia. Salt Lake County Clerk,Sherrie Swensen administered the Oath of Office for Council Member- Elect Alejandro Puy . Council Member Alejandro Puy acknowledged those who helped him reach his goals,the westside neighborhood,provided history of his last name and his childhood,and expressed the importance of the City’s westside and the people who called it home. Council Member Chris Wharton was accompanied by husband Christopher Jensen. Salt Lake City Recorder Cindy Lou Trishman administered the Oath of Office for Council Member Chris Wharton. Council Member Chris Wharton expressed gratitude,reviewed the challenges of the past four years,thanked the people of Salt Lake City,City employees,family,friends,campaign workers, community and others for all their support,along with past and present Council Members for their service and guidance.Council Member Wharton stated he was excited to serve with the most diverse City Council in Utah’s history. Council Member Darin Mano was accompanied by Fiancé Kevin Randall. Salt Lake City Recorder Cindy Lou Trishman administered the Oath of Office for Council Member Darin Mano. Council Member Darin Mano spoke to the importance of diverse representation on the Council and how it had changed,the challenges and successes of his campaign,his father’s immigration into Salt Lake City during WWII,reviewed his goals to continue to keep Salt Lake a safe place where people could grow up and achieve great things.Council Member Mano thanked his opponents,campaign staff,many businesses,and campaign supporters.He thanked his family and fiance for their support through life and the campaign process. Council Member Amy Fowler was accompanied by former Council Member James Rogers. Judge John Baxter administered the Oath of Office for Council Member Amy Fowler. Council Member Amy Fowler thanked everyone in attendance for supporting those being sworn in,acknowledged Judge Baxter;reciting an experience in his courtroom that lead to her inspiration to become a member of the City Council,reviewed the challenges of the past year,the opportunity to rise,and be better as a result of the challenges faced,and expressed gratitude to the residents of District 7 for re-electing her and having faith in her to represent the City efficiently and appropriately. Musical Number A musical number was performed by Shaadie and Kurt titled “We Don’t Know”. Shaadie gave a history of his work and thanked everyone for inviting him to participate in the ceremony. Closing Remarks Council Member Amy Fowler welcomed the Council Members to the City Council and thanked all those in attendance. Meeting adjourned at:1:08 pm. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Monday,January 3,2022. JOINT RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING FEBRUARY AS BLACK HISTORY MONTH IN SALT LAKE CITY WHEREAS, Black History Month is a time to celebrate the far-reaching contributions made by Black Americans throughout our country’s history, that have shaped our nation and our city for the better; and WHEREAS, the origin of Black History Month can be traced back to 1926 when Dr. Carter G. Woodson and the Association for the Study of Negro Life and History, which he co-founded, declared the second week of February “Negro History Week;” and WHEREAS, expounding upon the work of Dr. Carter G. Woodson, Black History Month was first proposed by Black educators, students, and the Black United Students group at Kent State University in 1969. In 1970, the first celebration of Black History Month took place at Kent State and six years later, in 1976, was recognized by President Gerald Ford urging Americans to “honor the too-often neglected accomplishments of Black Americans in every area of endeavor throughout our history;” and WHEREAS, contributions by Black Americans have influenced all facets of society, from culture to religion, from education to business and public service, and more; and WHEREAS, it is our honor to acknowledge and celebrate the heritage, perseverance, and achievements of Black Americans in our nation’s history. We acknowledge their struggle as an American struggle and at its core reflects upon our society; and WHEREAS, while we celebrate and recognize Black leaders, inventors, artists, musicians, and creators on a national level such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, George Washington Carver, Jackie Robinson, Billie Holiday, and many more, we also acknowledge those locally who have contributed to the rich history of our community in Salt Lake City and Utah; and WHEREAS, in Salt Lake City and Utah, we have many heroes to look up to and learn from. From trailblazers of the past like Shirley and Carl Kinsey and Bettye Gillespie, to advocates of today, such as Rev. France Davis (Civil Rights Activist and Emeritus Pastor of Calvary Baptist Church, retired), Jeanetta Williams (President of the SLC and Utah NAACP), and Rep. Sandra Hollins (first Black woman elected to serve in the Utah State Legislature), as well as the luminaries of the future; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Salt Lake City recognizes the month of February as Black History Month and the importance of Black History Month as an opportunity to reflect on the complex history of the United States, while remaining hopeful and confident about the path ahead. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor of Salt Lake City remain dedicated to dismantling racial inequality while advancing equity and justice to all. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Salt Lake City is committed to continuing the progress made throughout Black history, but also to ensure a positive Black future. We create history every day, and if we work together to make our today better than yesterday, our tomorrow will only be that much brighter. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the theme for Black History Month 2022 is “Black History and Wellness.” We have the opportunity and responsibility, today, to not only reflect on the obstacles overcome, but to also make the present a time where Black Americans continue to excel and thrive. Adopted this _____ day of February 2022 ________________________ _________________________ Erin Mendenhall Dan Dugan, Chair Salt Lake City Mayor Salt Lake City Council Member, District Six _________________________ ____________________________ Darin Mano, Vice Chair Victoria Petro-Eschler Salt Lake City Council Member, District Five Salt Lake City Council Member, District One __________________________ ____________________________ Alejandro Puy Chris Wharton Salt Lake City Council Member, District Two Salt Lake City Council Member, District Three __________________________ __________________________ Ana Valdemoros Amy Fowler Salt Lake City Council Member, District Four Salt Lake City Council Member, District Seven Item B1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards Budget Analysts DATE:February 15, 2022 RE: Budget Amendment Number Six FY22 MOTION 1 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date. MOTION 2 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. MOTION 3 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING and ADOPT ORDINANCE I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt an ordinance amending the FY 2021-22 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document only for items as shown on the motion sheet. Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the individual items being approved below; they are listed for reference. A-1: Suazo Membership ($25,000 from General Fund Balance) A-2: Move Grants Manager from ARPA to General Fund ($66,000 from General Fund Balance) A-3: Healthcare Innovation – Biohive ($50,000 from General Fund Balance) A-4: Fix the Bricks Grant – Transfer Grant Funded FTE from Fire Department to Department of Community & Neighborhoods – Budget Neutral A-5: Additional Sergeant FTE for Special Victims Unit ($81,671 and $54,300 from General Fund Balance) A-6: Police Access Control Update and Support ($214,538 from General Fund Balance) A-7: Fireworks Budget ($25,000 from General Fund Balance) A-9: Arts Council Staff Increase of 3 FTEs ($175,000 from General Fund Balance) A-10: Allen Park Plan CIP Project Rescope (Budget Neutral) A-11: Additional FTE - Executive Assistant in the Mayor’s Office ($39,792 from General Fund Balance) A-12: Citywide Equity Study ($90,000 from General Fund Balance) A-13: Fleet Fuel Cost Increases ($498,887 from General Fund Balance and $938,076 from Fleet Fund) A-14: COVID Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) ($200,000 from General Fund Balance) B-1: ARPA HOME Admin and Planning Funds ($176,660 from Miscellaneous Grants Fund) D-1: Interest Income on Bonding ($64,140 and $80,977 from CIP Fund) D-2: Housing Program Construction Costs ($1,100,000 from Housing Fund) D-3: Reimburse Miscellaneous Grants for Unreimbursed HUD HOPWA Funds ($32,495 from Housing Fund and $ -0- from Misc. Grant Fund) D-4: Treasury ERAP 1 Reallocated Funds ($3 million from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) D-5: Treasury ERAP 2 Reallocated Funds ($2,880,366 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) D-6: Annex Building Renovation – Moving Funds from Misc. Grants to CIP Fund ($500,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) D-7: State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan ($7 million from Debt Service Fund) E-1: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant ($86,750 from CIP Fund) E-2: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant, Round 2 ($93,750 from CIP Fund) E-3: Utah Department of Transportation, 600/700 N Frequent Transit Network Improvement Grant ($228,000 from CIP Fund) E-4: State of Utah, Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail Grant Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 3 G-1: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Distracted Driving Prevention Program Grant ($13,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) G-2: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program Grant ($9,690 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) G-3: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 De-Escalation Training Solicitation Grant ($92,230 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) G-4: U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Grant ($59,360 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) G-5: US Department of Justice, 2021 Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Grant ($340,246 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) G-6: Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) ($10,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 4 G-1: Utah State Office of Education, Child and Adult Care Food Program - Youth After School Programs Grant ($46,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) G-2: Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Grant Program, Marathon Petroleum Foundation Grant ($100,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) G-3: Mental Health First Responders, Utah Department of Human Services Grant ($80,010 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) I-1: Additional Funding for Planning Division Mailings ($90,000 from General Fund Balance) MOTION 4 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING and NOT ADOPT I move that the Council close the public hearing and proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke, Sylvia Richards, and Allison Rowland Budget and Policy Analysts DATE:February 15, 2022 RE: Budget Amendment Number Six FY2022 ________________________________________________________________________________ NEW INFORMATION At the February 8 briefing, the Council finished reviewing remaining items that weren’t discussed during the February 1 briefing. The discussion included potentially adding requests for new fulltime employees to the upcoming FY2023 annual budget deliberations so all the City’s competing needs could be considered in context together. Summarized below are Administration responses to the Council’s follow up questions. A-1: Suazo Business Center The Council asked when the City’s current membership expires, how much funding would be needed to continue the membership until the annual budget (to align the membership and annual funding cycles), and if other membership levels are available. The Administration indicated the City’s membership expired in September 2021. The Department reports services have been voluntarily continued while the funding request goes through the City’s budget process. Funding nine months at a cost of $18,750 would cover October 2021 through June 2022. Then, the full annual cost of $25,000 would need to be included in the next annual budget to continue membership. There is no higher or lower-level membership for governments. However, the State and County have chosen to provide funding above the $25,000 membership level. The County provides $130,000 annually towards the Center’s work supporting minority-owned businesses located within county limits, and the State through the Governor’s Office of Economic Development (GOED) provides $267,500 annually for services offered statewide. A-3: Healthcare Innovation Branding aka Biohive The Council asked when the City’s current membership expires, how much funding would be needed to continue the membership until the annual budget (to align the membership and annual funding cycles), if this is an ongoing or one-time expense, and how the first $50,000 appropriation was spent. The Administration indicated the City’s membership expired in September 2021. The Department reports services have been voluntarily continued while the funding request goes through the City’s budget process. Funding nine months at a cost of $37,500 would cover October 2021 through June 2022. This expense was originally identified as one-time. However, the Department states the expense should be considered ongoing and would need to be included in the next annual budget. The first $50,000 appropriation was used for the Utah Life Science Summit pandemic recovery information and services. The funds also contributed to a Biohive newsletter, branding and marketing. Project Timeline: Set Date: February 1, 2022 1st Briefing: February 1, 2022 2nd Briefing: February 8, 2022 3rd Briefing: February 15, 2022 Public Hearing: February 15, 2022 4th Briefing: TBD Potential Action: March 1, 2022 Page | 2 A-4: Fix the Bricks The Council asked what additional resources and program changes could decrease wait times for residents, if FEMA has any timeliness requirements or expectations for use of grant funding information on the program’s geographic equity. The Administration responded greater involvement of existing employees in the Housing Stability Division may be able to decrease wait times for program participants. In addition, the City is applying for State funding to increase the number of single-family homes participating in the program and potentially expand the program to multifamily and commercial properties. The City requested and received grant agreement extensions related to the pandemic and the March 2020 earthquake. Applications will be submitted for additional rounds of Fix the Bricks grant funding from FEMA. The Administration is exploring funding options to assist low- and moderate-income homeowners with covering the 25% match requirement but has not identified preferred funding options at this time. Other federal funds such as CDBG dollars are ineligible for covering the 25% match. The IMS Department is working with the Housing Stability Division to map program recipients and those on the waiting list. This information would allow the City to see relative participation rates between neighborhoods. A 2019 analysis showed most program applicants on the waiting list were from high- and middle-income areas. A-6: Public Safety Building Access Control Upgrade and Support The Council asked if there is a State or Federal deadline for meeting security compliance rules and whether there are any other time sensitivities the Council should know. The Administration responded there is no specific deadline date, but the risk of a security failure increases the longer the original system is used. The City is experiencing four to six month delays in server and network infrastructure orders which are needed for the system upgrade. Similar delays are expected for parts needed to repair the current system in case of failure. A-7: Restore July Fireworks Shows Funding The Council asked for any data showing that personal fireworks use increases when large public fireworks shows are unavailable. No such data currently exists to identify the impact, if any, of large public fireworks shows on personal fireworks usage. The Fire Department suggests community level risks may anecdotally be lower when large public fireworks shows are available. The Administration reiterated that the fireworks shows would be cancelled if the Air Quality Index or AQI exceeds 100 or if the U.S. Drought Monitor exceeds level 1.2. The City would receive a full refund if the show is cancelled more than 10 days in advance. A-9: Arts Council Staff Increase of 3 FTES The Council asked for clarification about to what extent, if any, the three additional FTEs requested would perform work for the nonprofit vs. the City. At the time of publishing this staff report, a small group meeting was being scheduled with the Administration to discuss this request. A-12: Citywide Equity Study The Council asked for a status update on the equity study. The study is expected to be completed August 2022 assuming additional funding is approved as requested in this budget amendment. The additional study tasks are focused on outreach to and findings related to the City’s Westside. The best place for the public to learn more as the study proceeds is the project webpage: www.keenindependent.com/saltlakecityequity2021/ Note that the webpage is currently being updated to show completed work and tasks in progress. The Administration provided the follow status update: “In 2021, Keen Independent Research Team administered equity surveys to employees, community members, residents, focus groups with strong ties to SLC, and HRC/REP/AAC commissions. They have analyzed all virtual workshop responses from external and internal participants. Also, Keen created and collected completed equity matrices that track the equity, inclusion, and belonging efforts of all City departments. They received all of this information at the end of 2021 and are currently collaborating with the Chief Equity Officer to meet with departments and analyze completed matrices. The findings from these matrices and analysis will be included in the final equity report. Drafting of the EI&B plan is still in progress but at least 90% complete.” Page | 3 B-1: ARPA Authorized HUD HOME Grant Funding for Admin and Planning Funds The Council asked is the 5% requested the maximum allowed by HUD for administration of the grant, will new employees be hired, will the funds pay for existing employees and additional info on the consultant contract. Council staff met with Housing Stability Division staff who shared the following details. - The HOME-ARPA grant has a 15% maximum for the costs of administering it. HUD is allowing early access to 5% (the amount of funding requested in this budget amendment) for staff to create the community assessment and allocation plan. The remainder of the grant funds may not be used until HUD approves the plan and the Council authorizes the budget. - The Division is not hiring new employees to administer the HOME-ARPA grant. - Most of the $176,660 will be used to pay existing employees for time working on administration of the HOME-ARPA grant this fiscal year and over the next few years. Staff have attended trainings, webinars, and weekly meetings with consultants to work on developing the HUD required community assessment and allocation plan. Some positions in the Division are funded by multiple grants proportional to the amount of work spent on eligible activities administering each grant and are not entirely covered by General Fund budget. - The Division has an existing contract with Zions Public Finance which runs concurrently with the 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan. HUD requires the City have the plan and update it to reflect allowable reuses, Council-identified spending priorities, grant funds received and many other details. $25,000 was encumbered under the contract from last fiscal year and is being used this fiscal year for developing the community assessment and allocation plan. The County and City are partnering on the effort to split these costs and streamline engagement with community stakeholders. HUD does not allow the use of HOME- ARPA grant funds on consultants until the community assessment and allocation plan are approved. The Division decided to use encumbered funds for the consultant to speed up development of those documents instead of adding to existing staff’s workload. Approximately $15,000 of the $176,660 could be used to reimburse the Division for use of the encumbered City funds. E-4: State of Utah, Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail Grant The Council asked the Parks and Public Lands Department how this project relates to the pause in work from the FY2022 annual budget contingency for implementing the Foothills Trails Plan. At the time of publishing this staff report a response from the Department was pending. Potential Council-added item: I-2: Rescope $1.3 Million of Parks Impact Fees as Match to State Grant for Five New Foothills Trailheads (Budget Neutral) At the February 8 briefing, the Council discussed the potential need to rescope funding approved as part of FY2022 CIP for two new trailheads in the Foothills. Item E-4 in this budget amendment is a $1.3 million State grant for five new trailheads in the Foothills. The Public Lands Department wants to use the CIP funding as a match to the State grant funding. This would require rescoping the CIP funding to be allowed to use on the five trailhead locations identified in the State grant application instead of the two specifically approved by the Council. The two trailheads using the CIP funding are also included in the five trailheads receiving the grant funding. 10 New Police Officers and Diversifying Public Safety Response Options The below item has not been discussed at earlier budget amendment briefings. This is part of a larger discussion about the City’s efforts to diversify public safety response options to better match the variety of situations experienced by people contacting the City for help. A-8: Violent Crimes Unit COPS Hiring Grant City Match ($1,181,460 from General Fund Balance) (Staff Note: The Council has requested additional information about other staffing and response model changes that the Police Department has put into place so that this request can be evaluated in the context of overall Department services and public safety. A briefing on this broader conversation will be scheduled once the information is available. The Council has requested that this budget amendment item be held until after that briefing, but this information is included for the purposes of the public hearing.) In 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) awarded a $1.25 million COPS Hiring Grant to the City for 10 new police officers. The grant requires the City to match funding and maintain employment of the new officers for three years. Over the grant period, the federal funding covers approximately 25% of the total cost and the City pays the Page | 4 other 75%. This funding request covers the FY2022 City match including new vehicles, computers and other equipment. The City match for ongoing personnel costs would be included in the FY2023 and FY2024 annual budgets and is estimated at $1.1 million. The 10 new patrol officers would form a new Violent Crimes Unit. Note that this would be in addition to Project Safe Neighborhoods which is a partnership between local, state and federal law enforcement agencies to reduce gun violence. The new officers would also participate in investigations and patrols. The Police Department is requesting DOJ approval for one of the 10 new officers to be a sergeant overseeing the Violent Crimes Unit. The City received COPS hiring grants several times before. The new police officers partially funded by the grant were retained and moved to be fully funded by the General Fund when the grant period ended. At the time of publishing this staff report, the Administration was preparing information about how this request fits into the City’s efforts to diversity public safety response options. In addition, Council staff is working with the Administration on creating a Council-requested infographic summarizing the several alternative response options. Policy Questions: 29 New Police Officers from Three Requests – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to brief the Council about plans to hire 29 new police officers which is composed of three separate requests listed below. The briefing could also include civilian staffing updates and efforts to diversify civilian-led public safety responses such as social workers, old police reports and traffic enforcement. o 10 patrol police officers for Violent Crimes Unit using DOJ COPS Grant funding (this item A-8) o 15 patrol officers and three sergeants for issues at and around the two homeless resource centers in the City using the State FY22 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant funding (pending Legislature decision on grant award amount and Council approval) o One additional sergeant for the Special Victims Unit using General Fund dollars (item A-5 above) Consider Request in Annual Budget Context – The Council may wish to consider if the new FTEs would be better evaluated in context of the annual budget and all the City’s competing needs. REP Commission Review – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if the additional staffing proposals have been presented to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission for review and feedback.  Information below was provided to the Council at earlier briefings  Budget Amendment Number Six includes thirty-five proposed amendments and requested changes to seven funds. Total expenditures coming from fund balance are $2,701,648. The Council may wish to note that the Administration is proposing to add sixteen ongoing FTE’s using Fund Balance, and those positions would need to be added to the upcoming annual budget. If all the items are adopted as proposed, then Fund Balance would be $29,721,935 or 21.29% above the 13% minimum target established by the Council in FY2020. State law was updated and set a maximum General Fund Balance limit of 35%. The increase is a result of higher- than-expected revenues and unspent funds dropping to Fund Balance at the end of FY2021. The Finance Department will be available at the briefing to provide a more detailed revenues update as summarized in the table later in this report. Inflation Impacts for Upcoming FY2023 Annual Budget Although there are positive revenue and fund balance reports, staff wanted to mention that there will likely be several inflationary impacts that may offset that positive news. Some departments have mentioned they expect significant cost increases for existing services and contract renewals as part of the upcoming FY2023 annual budget. For example, item A-13 in this budget amendment represents a 36% budget increase for fuel purchases. In addition, the CIP Cost Overrun Account is less able to offset project cost increases in response to pandemic-related construction supplies inflation so either project scopes are reduced, or additional funding may be needed. The FY2022 annual budget included significant use of one-time funding for ongoing expenses which will need to have ongoing revenue identified in future fiscal years to continue. The Council may wish to consider if some Page | 5 proposed items in this budget amendment would be better evaluated during the annual budget with the full context of the City’s competing needs. Revenue for FY2022 Budget Adjustments The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for Fiscal Year 2022. The Finance Department will be available at the briefing to review individual revenue line-item changes. Page | 6 According to the Administration, projections for fiscal year 2021 were better than expected, while projections for fiscal year 2022 continue to trend above budget. Sales tax for the first quarter was well above budget and the prior year. Franchise tax is lagging below budget from a decrease in water franchise ($250,000) and telephone ($150,000) franchise taxes. Other notable increases include licenses which are above budget driven by increases in airport parking taxes and innkeepers’ tax. Permits remain very strong with increases in plan check fees and building permits. Field reservations, land leases and building leases are leading to an increase in Charges, Fees and Rentals. Notable decreases include a decrease in moving violations and justice court fines. Fire reimbursement from the airport is also below budget. Fund Balance The Administration’s chart below shows the current General Fund Balance figures. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) has confirmed amounts that lapsed to General Fund Balance at the end of Fiscal Year 2021. If all items are approved as proposed by the Administration, then combined General Fund Balance would be 21.29% or $29,721,935 above the 13% minimum target. Impact Fees Update Page | 7 The Administration provided a summary of impact fee tracking, details on refunding amounts and dates and lists of unfinished projects with impact fee funding. The information is current as of December 13, 2021. As a result, the City is on-track with impact fee budgeting to have no refunds during all FY2022. The Administration reports work is nearing completion to update the fire and parks sections of the impact fee plan. The transportation section was updated last year. Eligible projects for police impact fees are being identified. Type Unallocated Cash “Available to Spend”Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring Impact Fees Fire $1,644,113 More than a year away - Parks $11,709,246 More than a year away - Police $471,211 More than a year away - Transportation $6,585,173 More than a year away - Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract Section A: New Items (note: to expedite the processing of this staff report, staff has included the Administration’s descriptions from the transmittal for some of these items) A-1: Suazo Business Center Membership ($25,000 from General Fund Balance) This $25,000 would fund an annual membership for the Suazo Business Center, resulting in an ongoing partnership with an organization that provides technical support for businesses owned by Latinx residents and members of other underrepresented groups. The Center's location on the West Side facilitates access for area residents, and it was able to expand its services last year because of $25,000 that the Council approved in FY2021 Budget Amendment #2. At the time, one-time federal CARES Act funding was available to cover this amount for one year, but this request is for ongoing City general fund support. Policy Questions: Membership Level – The Council may wish to ask the Administration is there are other membership levels available for the City. Evaluate During Upcoming Annual Budget – The Council may wish to clarify with the Administration whether this item could be addressed in the upcoming annual budget rather than in a budget amendment. Would the Council prefer to address this in the annual budget? A-2: Move Grants Manager from ARPA to General Fund ($66,000 from General Fund Balance) In the FY2022 annual budget the Council approved one Grants Manager FTE in the Finance Department using ARPA funding assuming the final guidance from the U.S. Treasury allowed such a use. The Finance Department has determined the position is not a qualified use and requests the Council shift the position to the General Fund. The position will continue to assist with tracking, reporting and compliance of ARPA funding as well as other grants. The City has seen an increase in grant applications to approximately 100 in the last two fiscal years. The City is on track for a similar number of grants in FY2022. The bipartisan infrastructure bill recently passed in Congress and signed by the President increases funding opportunities over the next several years and could also result in more grant applications. A-3: Healthcare Innovation Branding Biohive ($50,000 from General Fund Balance) Council staff asked DED why another $50,000 was needed after the same amount, also identified as one-time, was approved in Budget Amendment #4 of FY2021, and what deliverables would result from this amount of spending. The Department’s response did not address this specific question about the additional funding. The Department has provided general information about the goals of the program (see Attachment 1). Policy Questions: Ongoing or One-time Need – The Council may wish to clarify with the Administration if this is in fact more of an ongoing need, and if so whether it should be addressed in the upcoming annual budget rather than as sequential budget amendment requests. Page | 8 Status of Earlier $50,000 – The Council may wish to ask the Department if funds from FY2021 are fully spent or encumbered, and what data was collected because of the previous expenditure. A-4: Fix the Bricks Program and FTE Transfer from Fire Department to Community and Neighborhoods Department (Budget Neutral) This item would transfer an Office Technician II FTE and an hourly Office Technician from the Emergency Division within the Fire Department to the Housing Stability Division within the CAN Department. No budget impact would be incurred as the positions already exist. Note that both positions are currently vacant. Ongoing administration of the FEMA grant which funds Fix the Bricks and the two positions would also transfer to the CAN Department. The Housing Stability Division administers several other ongoing Federal grants, many from the U.S. HUD Department, and could apply those existing skillsets to this FEMA grant. The Division’s housing rehabilitation employees have also assisted Fix the Bricks operations in the past such as environmental reviews, floodplains, historic preservation, noise abatement and control, etc. There may be benefits of combining Fix the Bricks with the housing rehabilitation programs that offer small and medium sized repairs to qualified low- and moderate-income homeowners. The two Fix the Bricks employees would be supervised by the Housing Project Manager that also oversees the housing rehabilitation program. Demand has exceeded program capacity since launching several years ago. Last year an engineering firm was contracted with for home inspection and repair approvals which is speeding up that step of the process. Contractors must be on the approved list to submit seismic improvement project bids. A training program for contractors is being developed to try and get more added to the approved list. Issues related to supply chains and job vacancies are also reported to be slowing the pace of contractor’s work. The multiple emergencies of the past two years and ongoing pandemic have reduced Emergency Management staff’s ability to work on Fix the Bricks. Policy Questions: Resources to Increase Pace of Seismic Improvements – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what additional resources, staffing and/or program changes could decrease wait times for residents. FEMA’s Use of Funding Timeliness Expectations – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if FEMA has any timeliness requirements or expectations about the use of grant funds awarded to the City. The program recently completed using funding from 2017. Geographic Equity – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration potential changes to improve geographic equity of program participants such as helping low- and moderate-income residents cover the 25% cost share, using a sliding scale based on income, and assistance navigating funding options (historic tax credits, grants, local community organizations, etc.). The Council may also wish to ask if information is available on the current distribution of participants for completed projects and those on the waiting list. A-5: Additional Police Sergeant for Special Victims Unit ($135,971 from General Fund Balance) This request would create a second sergeant for the Special Victims Units (SVU) in the Police Department and provide funding for a vehicle, computer, and other equipment. The current sergeant supervises 12 detectives which is more than best practice and raises span of control issues. The SVU caseload has increased in recent years. A major driver of the growing caseload is sexual assault evidence kit DNA matches in the national database. A DNA match can provide suspect identification and other new information for investigation. In 2014 and 2015 over 700 sexual assault evidence kits from cold cases were submitted to the State Crime Lab for processing. The Police Department reports over 400 DNA matches have been identified which provides new leads to investigate. If the second sergeant is approved, then the SVU would designate a team focused on sex crimes investigations including the new DNA leads from the older sexual assault evidence kits. This is expected to improve case investigations and the Department’s ability to process the cold cases. The Department reports similar workload and span of control issues are being experienced for victim advocates working with the SVU. A grant funded advocate was embedded in the SVU to directly work with detectives Page | 9 investigating cold cases. However, the grant funding ends September 2022. Continuing the position by using General Fund dollars could be a request in the FY2023 annual budget. The Department reports one or two more SVU detectives may also be requested given the high number of DNA matches from sexual assault evidence kits. Policy Question: Resources to Increase Pace of Cold Case Investigations – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what resources in addition to SVU police officers could improve the pace of cold case investigations. For example, are there upstream or downstream resources that could help crime lab evidence processing, victim advocates, the justice court or prosecutor’s office? Evaluate During Upcoming Annual Budget – The Council may wish to ask if this position should be considered in the context of the annual budget, or if the need is more immediate/urgent because of the caseload? A-6: Police Access Control Upgrade and Support ($214,538 from General Fund Balance) This request would replace the original security access control system at the Public Safety Building which was installed nine years ago. The funding includes $113,198 for hardware (controllers, readers, and server), $56,340 for installation and ongoing maintenance and support estimated at $45,000 annually. The new system allows the building to continue meeting Federal and State security compliance rules. The hardware includes a new server that could act as the backbone for a new standard security system across all city facilities. The approach was developed by IMS, Facilities and Engineering. The Police Department would be the first to move to the new system. Additional funding may be needed to transfer other departments and facilities into the new system A-7: Fireworks Budget ($25,000 from General Fund Balance) This request would fund two fireworks shows in July 2022: one at Jordan Park on Independence Day, July 4th, and another at Liberty Park on Pioneer Day, July 24th. Funding and contracts for the two shows are typically needed in the spring to ensure vendor availability. The Administration states the shows could be cancelled based on certain conditions such as an air quality index of 100+ and severe drought. The Council removed funding for the shows in the FY2022 annual budget because of the ongoing drought. At the time some Council Members expressed concern about fireworks in general, that they are always bad for air quality. Some current Council Members have expressed similar concerns. Policy Question: Alternative Celebration Options – The Council may wish to discuss alternative options to celebrate the two July holidays such as festivals, laser & light shows, drone shows, etc. A-8: This item will be held as a future briefing about the City’s efforts to diversify public safety response options A-9: Arts Council Staff Increase of 3 FTEs ($175,000 from General Fund Balance) The Administration indicates that the Arts Council needs additional staff support to handle current workload as well as the duties/role of the Mayor’s Advisor on Arts and Culture which was shifted from the Mayor’s Office to the Arts Council. A total of three (3) FTEs are being requested: two (2) Arts Council Program Coordinators and one (1) Arts Council Program Manager. The Council may wish to note that these same positions were initially proposed in the last annual budget process requesting the use of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) monies to fund the positions, however, these positions did not qualify for ARPA funds, and the Council did not prioritize them for funding with General Fund dollars when balancing the budget before adoption. The Administration is requesting that these positions be funded now using fund balance – six months each for two program coordinators and six months for one program manager. The job descriptions are as follows: Arts Council Program Coordinators (Annual salary and benefits $94,383 – Six months is $47,192) The incumbents would coordinate, organize, and implement Arts Council & Economic Development-related programs and services; implement marketing efforts, collaborate on grant writing and reporting; provide Page | 10 information and technical assistance as needed to artists, arts organizations, and the public; and track income and expenses. Arts Council Program Manager (Annual salary and benefits $121,116 – Six months is $60,558) The incumbent would direct one or more major program and initiative(s) within the City’s Department of Economic Development, including arts and culture programming, small business and entrepreneurship support, and recruitment and retention activities. Activities would include being responsible for the department programs, working with community members, advisory boards, and project management with the end goal to support the City’s arts, economic and equity master plan goals. Policy Questions: Work for the Non-profit and/or the City – The Council may wish to ask whether the new staff members will perform work that relates to the non-profit organization, or whether the work will be directly for Salt Lake City. Evaluate During Upcoming Annual Budget – The Council may wish to discuss if this proposal would be better evaluated during the annual budget with the full context of the City’s competing needs. The FY2022 annual budget tentatively included using ARPA funding for three new Arts Council FTEs, but U.S. Treasury guidance determined those positions were an ineligible use. The Administration shared the following context regarding this policy question: 1. “ZAP Grant Funding: Since 2016, the Arts Council’s award from Salt Lake County Zoo, Arts, and Parks (ZAP) Tier I grant funding has averaged $360,000 annually, based on qualifying programming and operating expenses. This prestigious grant, of which the Arts Council is the only local Arts Agency within among only 22 organizations countywide, is a continuing opportunity to leverage funds outside the City. Due to strategic shifts in programming in 2018, the Arts Council no longer incurs the $1.5 to 2 million dollars cost of in-house expenses to the Twilight Concert Series. A natural consequence of this shift is that the annual ZAP award is calculated based on three years of qualifying expenditures; thus, the organization’s qualifying expenditures have been significantly decreasing with compounding effects. The Arts Council projects over $175,000 in losses by 2022. The additional staffing costs will qualify as expenditures to begin to mitigate and stabilize this award in the next three years (although it will not reach its previous levels due to lower expenditures). So, less expenditures lead to a lesser grant award. It should be noted that the ZAP grant revenue losses will still occur and compound despite new staffing expenditures mitigating the stabilization of this critical funding. In preparation for FY23 the staff and board are currently considering tiered approaches and scenarios to programmatic cuts while mitigating service losses to the arts community during one of the hardest hit industries through the COVID-19 pandemic. 2. Programmatic & Mayoral goal execution and staffing capacity: Since 2013, the Arts Council has been a staff of six full-time City employees (5 in 2011). Since that time significant changes to programming scope, budget, and priorities/values-and a rapidly growing city-have occurred with no increases to full- time support. Over the years, there have been increases to program funds and the grants budget without additional staffing support. Major impacts include our ability to deliver program services namely in Public Art and the new maintenance fund, all public programs such as Living Traditions Presents, City Arts Grants; and new initiatives of the City, and the Mayor’s Plan-all outside the scope of baseline programs and functions of our Local Arts Agency designation. Additionally, in 2020 the full-time policy role of Mayor’s Advisor on Arts & Culture was eliminated from the Mayor’s Office and that role condensed to the Arts Division Executive Director. This has resulted in expanded Citywide and external communications, projects, policy, and consultation (internal and external) asked of the Executive Director as a result, and the incorporation of the management of the Cultural Core project into the Arts Council. For the Arts Council to continue its development efforts (which have shown measurable increases in recent years) to begin to mitigate the ZAP losses, and leverage value to the City, capacity needs to exist to staff the above efforts. [If the Council were to wait to fund the positions during the annual budget process], the above considerations would just be further postponed and continue the strains mentioned. The Arts Council has Page | 11 requested staffing at the Department since FY21 to mitigate these challenges. It has been in the Mayors Plan to “Stabilize the Structure and Funding of the Arts Council” in Plans 2020-2022. While our team is passionate and committed, we have experienced staff retention and morale issues related to high volumes of work. Retaining the incredible talent that we currently have is of the utmost importance for service continuity to the arts community.” A-10: Allen Park CIP Rescope (Budget Neutral to Swap Funding Sources) In FY2021 CIP, the Council approved $450,000 of recaptured bond funds to create an Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan for Allen Park. In FY2022 CIP, the Council approved $420,000 of parks impact fees for historic preservation and renovation work at 11 structures in the park and capital improvements like pedestrian stairway connections and new amenities. The funding includes analysis, cost estimates and construction ready designs. Additional funding requests for construction would come to the Council in future budget openings. This request is to rescope the FY2022 CIP funding of $420,000 to be used on the Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan instead of the pre-construction work for structure renovations and capital improvements. This change accommodates legal limitations that bond funds may not be spent on the plan. The FY2021 CIP funding of $450,000 would be used for the pre-construction work instead of developing the Reuse Plan. The total funding available for Allen Park would not change. The Parks and Public Lands Department provided the below breakdown of how the bond funds have been spent so far. $284,253 of bond funds remain and need to be spent quickly to comply with spending deadlines. The remaining bond funds are anticipated to be fully spent on waterline replacements, water meter replacements and roof upgrades. Construction schedules estimate the work could be completed over the coming summer months. -$75,000 for Assets & Structures Inventory & Documentation/Assessments of Historic Features -$33,993 for Roof Stabilization & Leak Repair, George Allen Home -$31,433 for Construction Documents for Water Line / Water Meter Replacement & Irrigation Upgrade -$11,560 for Installation of Power Boxes for Site Power / Event Infrastructure -$11,505 for Waste and Hazardous Materials Removal from Historic Residences -$2,256 for Engineering fees charged for review of construction documents A-11: Executive Assistant in the Mayor’s Office ($39,792 from General Fund Balance) This item would add one executive assistant FTE to the Mayor’s Office. The requested funding is for five months. The fully loaded annual cost is estimated at $95,501 and would be added to the FY2023 annual budget. A-12: Citywide Equity Study ($90,000 from General Fund Balance) The Council approved $100,000 for this study in Budget Amendment #4 of FY2020. This additional funding adds several tasks to the study scope: -Task 1. Additional project coordination and management for 2022. -Task 2. Documentation and mapping of current community engagement processes at the City, including those spearheaded by the Civic Engagement Team and those led by departments. -Task 3. Review of current City data on how/whether constituents receive information or provide feedback. -Task 4. Review of representation of different constituencies on City advisory boards and other groups. -Task 4. Interviews, virtual workshops, focus groups and other discussions with City staff and community leaders. -Task 5. Review of the literature concerning good practices for public sector communication and engagement with hard-to-reach populations. -Task 6. Case studies of good practices employed by state or local governments. -Task 7. Recommendations for solidifying and strengthening current efforts and creating new avenues for outreach and engagement. -Task 8. Piloting new community engagement strategies. -Task 9. Report and three presentations. A-13: Fuel Cost Increases ($938,076 to Fleet Fund from Several Sources) Page | 12 Fuel inflation in the market has caused costs to exceed the FY2022 Fleet Fund budget for fuel. This item will increase the fuel budget to be enough to reach the end of the fiscal year. The FY2022 budget has $2.6 for fuel purchases which would be increased 36% to $3.5 million. Council staff requested a funding source breakdown for the additional budget. The information was not available at the time of publishing this staff report. A-14: COVID Personal Protective Equipment ($200,000 from General Fund Balance) The City’s supply of masks and other PPE to combat COVID is depleting. This request is for an additional $200,000 to purchase additional supplies to keep citizens, visitors, and employees safe in City owned buildings. The new masks will be medical grade and tests will also be procured. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section B-1: ARPA Authorized HUD HOME Grant Funding for Admin and Planning Funds ($176,660 from HOME-ARPA Grant) HUD has authorized the City to access 5% ($176,659.75) of admin and planning funds of the City's 2021 HUD HOME-ARPA award (total award, $3,533.195). HOME-ARPA funds are designated for housing opportunities for individuals experiencing homelessness. These admin and planning funds will facilitate existing City staff and expenses related to the HUD-required HOME-ARPA Community Assessment. The Community Assessment will identify needs and opportunities to help direct the HOME-ARPA funds. It’s important to note that the total award is one-time additional grant funding from HUD. This is separate from the annual HOME grant funding the City receives. After HUD reviews and approves the Community Assessment, the Council would need to adopt a substantial amendment to the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan for the City to accept and be able to use the funding. Housing Stability staff will provide the Council with a quick overview of this one-time funding, the process and timeline. Policy Question: Community Needs for this Funding – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration what community needs should be prioritized for this funding and any recommendations for stakeholders to be included in developing the Community Assessment. Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section (None) Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Interest Income on Bonding ($64,140 and $80,977 from CIP Fund) The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019A, were issued in October 2019 for the purpose of funding the reconstruction of City streets. The total par amount of the bonds issued were $17,540,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, the unspent bond proceeds have been earning interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect the actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from October 2020 through August 2021. The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020, were issued in September 2020 for the purpose of funding the reconstruction of City streets. The total par amount of the bonds issued were $17,745,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, the unspent bond proceeds have been earning interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect the actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from February 2021 through August 2021. D-2: WITHDRAWN D-3: Reimburse Misc. Grants for Unreimbursed HUD HOPWA Funds ($32,495 from Bank Pool Clearing Account) Finance discovered that $32,494.55 was paid out to a subgrantee in 2017, but never reimbursed from HUD for HOPWA Cost Center 7261611. The HUD reimbursement deadline of three years has passed for these funds. Housing Page | 13 Stability has identified unrestricted funds from 7800404 Bank Pool Clearing to make the City whole. This budget amendment will facilitate the transfer of funds from a 78 Fund Class to a 72 Fund Class. The Bank Pool Clearing account is used for housing related expenses like credit and title reports, mortgage insurance premiums, and loan fees. The Finance Department worked with the Housing Stability Division to change policies, procedures and staff training to avoid the City losing out on missed reimbursements in the future. D-4: Treasury ERAP 1 Reallocated Funds ($3 million from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Treasury has reallocated unspent Emergency Rent Assistance Program (ERAP) 1 funds set-aside for the State of Utah by low-performing cities and made these funds available to apply for by high-performing cities, such as Salt Lake City. These reallocated funds are for direct client assistance only. To administer Salt Lake City’s initial ERAP 1 award, the City contracted with the State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services’ (DWS) online Utah Rent Relief application portal, https://rentrelief.utah.gov/. Coordinating with DWS, Housing Stability staff have determined that Salt Lake City could apply for $3,000,000 in reallocated ERAP 1. These funds will further assist Salt Lake City residents with deposit, rent, utilities, rent arrears, and utility arrears, again utilizing the Utah Rent Relief application portal. Note: This new request is separate from, and does not affect, the City’s other Treasury ERAP 1 ($6,067,033) and ERAP 2 ($4,800,559.40) awards. See attached funding agreement. (Note: 7262150- Treasury ERA Direct Financial Assistance, is the current Cost Center for ERAP 1 Direct Client Assistance) Nearly all of the $6 million from ERAP 1 has been spent with some outstanding invoices pending processing. The deadline to spend ERAP 1 funds is September 30, 2022. The deadline to spend ERAP 2 funds is September 30, 2025. If D-4 and D-5 are approved as requested, then the City’s total funding from ERAP would be $13,867,632. D-5: Treasury ERAP 2 Reallocated Funds ($2,880,366 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) This budget amendment is to recognize the City's second allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act, Treasury Emergency Rent Assistance (ERAP) 2 funds, in the amount of $2,880,335.64, for the purpose of addressing housing stability for Salt Lake City residents. See attached funding agreement. The City approved the first allocation of the ERAP 2 funds in BA1 of FY 21-22, in the amount of $1,920,233.76. The City's total ERAP 2 award is $4,800,599.40. BA1 included the following budget items for those funds: Direct Client Assistance $1,632,199, and Community Partner Admin $288,034.76. To administer Salt Lake City’s first and second allocations of ERAP 2, the City will contract with the State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services’ (DWS) online Utah Rent Relief application portal, https://rentrelief.utah.gov/. The City has previously and successfully contracted with DWS for the City’s ERAP 1 funds. This budget amendment aligns with Treasury guidance on eligible activities and allowable percentage amounts for ERPA 2. In addition to further supporting Direct Client Assistance (deposits, rent, utilities, rent arrears, and utility arrears), and the associated Community Partner Admin to facilitate the proper distribution of these funds, Housing Stability is requesting City Admin to support one (1) FTE, and funds to support Housing Stability services. Re: the one (1) FTE: Currently, the City’s ERAP 1 and 2 funds are being administered by 1 PTE. This position is necessary to facilitate the City administration, coordination, and compliance monitoring. This position was pervious approved by Council with ERAP 1 funding. Since then, the administration of these funds has demonstrated that a FTE is required. This one (1) requested position would be Grade 26, Community Development Grant Specialist, fully loaded for 39 months. (April 2022 - Jun 2025, at $34.50 an hour [$215,280], plus benefits [$53,820]. Total $269,100.) This position would be fully funded by ERAP funding and would sunset when funding expires. Re: Housing Stability services: According to the Treasury, eligible “Housing Stability” services include: Case management, Eviction prevention, Eviction diversion programs, Mediation between landlords and tenants, Housing counseling, Fair housing counseling, Housing navigators or promotors that help households access ERA programs or find housing, Housing-related services for survivors of domestic abuse or human trafficking, Legal services or attorney’s fees related to eviction proceedings and maintaining housing stability, Specialized services for individuals with disabilities or seniors that support their ability to access or maintain housing. A public competitive process would receive applications from providers for eligible Housing Stability services. Staff note: after transmittal updated numbers confirmed the total amount should actually be $41 less than the originally requested budget. This will be adjusted for the Council’s final adoption vote. D-6: Annex Building Renovation – Moving Funds from Misc. Grants to CIP Fund ($500,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) Page | 14 In Budget Amendment #2, the Council added an item totaling $500,000 in grant funding to be used for Annex Building Renovations. This amount was approved within the Miscellaneous Grants Fund. Since the associated annex building renovation should be done through CIP, the budget needs to be moved. D-7: State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan ($7 million from Debt Service Fund) On December 6, 2021, the City and the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) entered into a loan agreement which will be used to finance a portion of a neighborhood parking structure between 400 West and 500 West and 600 South and 700 South. The loan is expected to be repaid with funds allocated to the City by H.B. 244 (2021). The City has received funds for the State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the receipt of loan proceeds and the expenditure budget to disburse the proceeds for the project. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant ($86,750 from CIP Fund) The Dept. of Community & Neighborhood, Division of Engineering applied for and received $86,750 for the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 (round 1) for safety improvements to the railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South. Planned safety improvements include widening the roadway, improving sight distance by raising the street grade approach, adding sidewalk on the south side of the crossing, adding bike lanes, and replacing the railroad crossing signals. The funding plan is to request an additional $260,250 in the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 Round 2 competition to complete the funding package for the project. A Public hearing was held 7/5/21. E-2: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant, Round 2 ($93,750 from CIP Fund) The Dept. of Community & Neighborhood, Division of Engineering applied for and received $93,750 for the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 (round 2) for safety improvements to the railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South. Planned safety improvements include widening the roadway, improving sight distance by raising the street grade approach, adding sidewalk on the south side of the crossing, adding bike lanes, and replacing the railroad crossing signals. This grant has no match requirement. A public hearing was held 12/7/21. E-3: Utah Department of Transportation, 600/700 N Frequent Transit Network Improvement Grant ($228,000 from CIP Fund) The Dept. of Community & Neighborhood, Division of Engineering applied for and received $93,750 for the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 (round 2) for safety improvements to the railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South. Planned safety improvements include widening the roadway, improving sight distance by raising the street grade approach, adding sidewalk on the south side of the crossing, adding bike lanes, and replacing the railroad crossing signals. This grant has no match requirement. A public hearing was held 12/7/21 for the original grant application for this award. E-4: State of Utah, Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail Grant The Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands received $1,300,000 for the Foothills Natural Area & Bonneville Shoreline Trailhead Infrastructure Improvements. The project proposes to construct five public access trailheads along the stretch of the Bonneville Shoreline Trail that runs through the Salt Lake City foothills between Emigration Canyon and Davis County. Proposed trailhead locations are: 1) Bonneville Boulevard near City Creek Canyon and Utah State Capitol, 2) Emigration Canyon near This Is The Place Heritage Park, 3) Popperton Park near the University of Utah, 4) 18th Avenue in the upper Avenues neighborhood, and 5) Victory Road northwest of the Utah State Capitol. This grant has a match requirement of $1,300,000. Parks & Public Lands has committed matching funds is from parks impact fees adopted in FY 2022 Capital Improvement Program for the Foothills Trailhead Development Phase II. The $2.6 million total project funding will fully cover construction costs at all five locations based on current plans and estimates. Note: This funding is not subject to the FY2022 annual budget adoption ordinance contingency on all Foothill trails funding because this project is constructing trailhead infrastructure. Policy Question: Pausing Trail Construction and Building Trailhead Infrastructure – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how this relates to the pause in work relating to the Foothills Trails Plan. Section F: Donations (None) Page | 15 Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 3 G-1: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Distracted Driving Prevention Program Grant ($13,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Police Department applied for and received a $13,000 grant from the Utah Highway Safety Office for the 2022 Distracted Driving Prevention Program. The grant funding is for overtime to conduct distracted driving enforcement/education shifts. A Public Hearing was held on 4/20/21 for the grant application on this award. G-2: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program Grant ($9,690 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Police Department applied for and received a $9,690 grant from the Utah Highway Safety Office for the 2022 Salt Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program. This award is to fund crosswalk enforcement/education overtime and Youth bicycle rodeo overtime. A Public Hearing was held on 4/20/21. G-3: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 De-Escalation Training Solicitation Grant ($92,230 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Police Department applied for and received a $92,320 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services through the FY21 Community Policing Development De-Escalation Training Program. The grant will fund the Apex Officer Interactive Crisis Intervention, De-Escalation and Force Options Virtual Reality Training Simulator. It will also provide funding for up to 20 officers to attend an ICAT (Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics) de-escalation train-the-trainer course as well as training staff overtime/supplies to implement the ICAT and virtual reality curriculums. The Apex Officer Virtual Reality Training System is a comprehensive solution that is designed to allow trainers the ability to give presentations and classes, conduct interactive testing and assessment, and provide immersive, hands-on scenario-based exercises with detailed debriefing and after-action review. ICAT is a training program that provides first responding police officers with the tools, skills, and options they need to successfully and safely defuse a range of critical incidents. The only costs being funded are for per diem. Remaining travel costs will be covered by other funding sources. A Public Hearing was held on 10/5/21. G-4: U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Grant ($59,360 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Police Department applied for and received a $59,360 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services through the FY21 Community Policing Development Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act. The grant will fund training for Employee Wellness and Peer Support Teams, Wellness Initiative, chaplain uniforms, program education and marketing materials, supplies, program evaluation, instructor fees for Family Wellness Workshops, and overtime. A Public Hearing was held on 9/7/21. G-5: US Department of Justice, 2021 Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Grant ($340,246 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Police Department applied for and received a grant award from the U.S. Department of Justice under the 2021 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) program. The total grant award is $340,246. Of that total the City will subaward $57,055 to the Unified Police Department and $57,054 to Salt Lake County (Sheriff's Office). The subaward amounts are determined by a federal funding allocation formula. The Police Department will use its award to provide training for sworn and civilian personnel, to support directed community policing overtime, and to purchase the following: a tactical robot, less lethal shotguns and ammo, tactical operation center throw phone capability enhancements, a laptop for Crime Lab FARO software, vest carriers and plates for Crime Lab personnel, LEAPS (Law Enforcement Automated Personnel Software), and camera systems for the Internal Affairs Unit and the HOP physical training facility. No Match is required. A Public Hearing was held on 10/5/21. G-6: Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) ($10,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for additional grant funding and was awarded $10,000 from the State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), under the State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) program. The State is combining these new funds with the previously funded amount of $1,500. The funds will be used for an overt pole camera kit, Narcan nasal spray, and drug prevention resource cards. A public hearing was held 9/7/21. Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 4 Page | 16 G-1: Utah State Office of Education, Child and Adult Care Food Program - Youth After School Programs Grant ($46,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Youth & Family Division of Public Services applied for and received a continuation grant offered annually by the Utah State Office of Education, under the Child and Adult Care Food Program. These funds are available to youth service providers as part of the At-Risk Snack Program to reimburse the costs of snacks served to children participating in the after-school programs. Central City Rec. Center, Fairmont Park, Glendale Library, Liberty Park, Northwest Rec. Center, Ottinger Hall, the Youth and Family Division Office, and Sorenson Campus will receive reimbursement directly through the State Office of Education and will receive up to $46,000, based on qualified snack expenses. SLC is reimbursed on a monthly basis and only qualified healthy snacks and meals served to children participating in the after-school enrichment/education activities during the afterschool program hours are eligible for reimbursement. A public hearing was held 10/5/21. G-2: Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Grant Program, Marathon Petroleum Foundation Grant ($100,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Division of Youth & Family Services applied for and received $100,000 in grant funding for the Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Program. The funding will be used to purchase two 14-passenger vans that will be used by program staff to transport youth participants from neighborhood elementary schools to the YouthCity Northwest Recreation center site for afterschool programming. No match is required. A public hearing was held 1/18/22. G-3: Mental Health First Responders, Utah Department of Human Services Grant ($80,010 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Human Resource Dept. applied for and received $80,010 in grant funding for the Mental Health First Responders grant program from Utah Dept. of Human Services. The funding will be used to increase the capacity of the City's existing EAP (Employee Assistance Program), targeting first responders. The two clinicians currently under contract with ComPsych will increase their hours of availability to provide onsite, in person, telephone, and virtual counselling particularly emergency services for individuals who may be in crisis. The total hours will increase by 815 over the course of the pilot projecting. No match is required. A public hearing was held 1/18/22. Section I: Council Added Items I-1: PLACEHOLDER: Additional Funding for Planning Division Mailings ($90,000 – General Fund Balance) The Planning Division needs additional funding to complete mailings for several projects between now and the end of the fiscal year. The Council Chair has suggested using fund balance to supplement the cost of Planning Division mailings as detailed below. The additional $3,980 would be flexible funding in case the number of land use applications and/or the citywide mailing costs come in higher than expected. -$78,120 for two citywide mailings -$1,600 for land use application mailings -$6,300 for Ballpark Station Area Plan and Downtown Building Height code amendments mailings -$86,020 Total ATTACHMENTS 1.Item A-3: Healthcare Innovation Branding Biohive Response from Department of Economic Development to Council Staff’s Questions ACRONYMS ADA – Americans with Disabilities Act ARPA – American Rescue Plan Act CAFR – Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CAN – Community and Neighborhoods Department CCJJ – Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice CIP – Capital Improvement Program COPS – Community Oriented Policing Services COVID – Name for the disease caused by the 2019 Novel Coronavirus ERAP – Emergency Rental Assistance Program Page | 17 FTE – Full Time Equivalent Position FY – Fiscal Year GF – General Fund HOPWA – Housing Opportunities For People With Aids HUD – United States Housing and Urban Development Department JAG – Justice Assistance Grant PPE – Personal Protective Equipment RDA – Redevelopment Agency SAFG – Utah State Asset Forfeiture Grant Program SIB – State Infrastructure Bank UDOT – Utah Department of Transportation Attachment 1. Department of Economic Development’s "Response" to Council Staff Questions about Item A-3, Healthcare Innovation Branding Biohive Council Staff Questions: The Council approved $50,000 in Budget Amendment #4 of FY21 for this same use and it was identified as one-time. Could you please discuss why additional funding is needed and what deliverables are expected? Department of Economic Development Response: In 2020, the Mayor convened stakeholders in the life science industry to help shape the City’s economic development approach around health care innovation. The goal of this was to harness the impact and growth of this industry and to connect companies and organizations to workforce development, STEM education, and other programs and policies that will help provide economic opportunity to underserved communities in the City. The partnerships created between Salt Lake City, GoUtah, WTC Utah, BioUtah, EDC Utah, University of Utah, as well as companies representing various sub-sectors of health care innovation are focused on elevating the awareness of this industry with a focus on branding and marketing it through the new entity known as Biohive. This partnership is in alignment to not duplicate efforts, but to harness the collective goals of key organizations and the City to retain and help grow this industry together for the benefit of City residents. This will be accomplished through the following deliverables and activities: i.Marketing and branding of the industry that has the City at the central hub of activity to connect residents to an industry that creates high wage jobs (multiple entry points for careers and jobs), pipeline of new talent through new technologies being created at the University of Utah, and an already strong yet not well-known history of diagnostic and medical device companies. ii.Workforce development programing in partnership with the Salt Lake School District, Salt Lake Community College, and higher education by providing new opportunities for communities who have not participated before in the life science industry. Page | 18 iii.Programming and activities to ensure the momentum of this industry continues to be retention and growth. iv.A report that updates on these fronts within Salt Lake City. Violent Criminal Apprehension Team (V-CAT) Chief Mike Brown Summary •SLCPD has received a grant award from the COPS Hiring program to fund 10 new police officers. •If approved and funded, SLCPD will create the Violent Criminal Apprehension Team (V-CAT). •This team will specifically address emerging violent crime patterns and repeat violent crime offenders in Salt Lake City. •It is known that a small number of repeat violent individuals are responsible for a disproportionate number of crimes in our city. •Identifying and apprehending the most violent offenders can have a significant impact on crime trends. Funding •Funding agency: U.S. DOJ Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Office •Grant program: 2020 COPS Hiring Program •Length of award: The performance period is 36 months -available for 60 months to facilitate hiring etc., which would allow the grant to run until 06/30/2025 •Amount awarded: $1,250,000 •FY 22 Budget Request: $ 1,181,460 •12-month retention requirement for each officer position funded. Personnel $364,030 Officer Equipment and Supplies $287,430 Fleet $495,000 IMS $35,000 Total $1,181,460 Violent Criminal Apprehension Team (V-CAT) •V-CAT will be comprised of nine detectives and one sergeant. •Funds will be used to create two Intelligence -led Policing (ILP) squads to specifically address emerging violent crime patterns and repeat violent crime offenders in Salt Lake City. •The team will be housed within the Investigations Unit and will use intelligence led policing strategies and performance measures. •V-CAT will work directly with Patrol, Homicide Squad, Robbery Unit, Special Victims Unit and other Investigation Divisions to dedicate resources to lead the effort to address emerging violent crime patterns and increase accountability for repeat offenders of violent crime. Violent Criminal Apprehension Team (V-CAT) •V-CAT will seek to locate and safely apprehend violent offenders and those who commit crimes using weapons. Case examples include homicide suspects, aggravated assault suspects, domestic violence suspects, child abuse suspects, suspects in sex-crimes cases. •Updates on V-CAT will be provided to community members through updates to the Mayor’s Office and City Council. •V-CAT will obtain data on violent crime statistics from SLCPD CompStat. •V-CAT will work with AP&P, the Salt Lake County District Attorney’s Office and the United States Attorney’s Office. Violent Criminal Apprehension Team (V-CAT) •V-CAT is intended to leverage existing department-wide resources for more effective problem solving and to enhance the department’s ability to proactively locate and safely arrest violent crime offenders and to address the immediate conditions that give rise to violent crime issues. •Patrol officers and detectives are not able to dedicate the staff hours required to locate and apprehend these offenders. •Having a team of officers available to focus on that task would be a force multiplier in solving crimes and holding offenders accountable. •This is not a team that would be used for low level enforcement or for the enforcement of minor infractions. Citywide Approach to Public Safety •V-CAT will supplement the already existing –and future –programs within the city to expand public safety. •SLCPD will continue utilizing Social Workers to provide a safe environment for people to access individualized care, support, and appropriate community resources. •SLCPD will continue utilizing its Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Program, which includes specially trained law enforcement officers to effectively deal with a situation involving a person experiencing a mental health crisis. All sworn officers will be CIT -certified by December 2022. •SLCPD will develop its Police Civilian Response Team (PCRT) and expand its Call Diversion Program to process lower priority calls for service that can be handled by phone. SLC Public Lands Park Rangers Salt Lake City’s Park Ranger program will provide educational services and safety in City parks, trails and natural areas through quality customer service to all park users and visitors. Salt Lake City’s Park Rangers will: •Serve as a friendly representative for the City, build relationships, create community, and assist park visitors. •Support positive use of the downtown parks and natural areas, aid in constructive activation efforts and maintenance. •Support the outreach efforts of human services organizations to assist people who are in need of support. •Promote voluntary compliance by educating the public about the Parks Code and Parks rules. Community Health Access Team What is CHAT? Teams a social worker with a firefighter to respond as a 2- person unit to specific, low-acuity call types Responds to individuals in need of assistance beyond that which can be provided by emergency services Connects individuals to answers, information, and service providers Helps to establish a treatment plan for a wide array of patients with various needs CHAT is not designed to respond to violent situations or life-threatening emergencies. February 2022 Mobile Crisis Outreach Teams [MCOT] What is MCOT? •MCOT teams have both licensed clinicians who are highly trained and peer support specialists (also certified). Have personal experience with past mental health or substance use challenges. •The team arrives in unmarked vehicles to support privacy, they strive to keep those that they serve in their communities and out of hospitals and detention facilities. •SLC911 works closely with the leadership of MCOT to develop a seamless call flow to ensure that we can meet the needs of our callers and provide mental health options where appropriate as an alternative response to the call for help. •Since Feb 2021 Dispatch has referred 516 calls to MCOT. •Out of the 516 calls only 39 were later determined to need law enforcement . •234 Calls were able to be resolved just over the phone with a cris is support professional. •232 Calls were handled by contacting the caller in person. Community Health Access Team What is CHAT? Teams a social worker with a firefighter to respond as a 2- person unit to specific, low-acuity call types Responds to individuals in need of assistance beyond that which can be provided by emergency services Connects individuals to answers, information, and service providers Helps to establish a treatment plan for a wide array of patients with various needs CHAT is not designed to respond to violent situations or life-threatening emergencies. February 2022 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238 PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ___________________________________ Date Received: ________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ___________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 14,2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Budget Amendment #6 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director (801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2021-22 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $ 0.00 $ 2,701,648.00 FLEET FUND 1,482,576.00 1,482,576.00 IMS FUND 259,338.00 259,338.00 MISCELLANEOUS GRANT FUND 6,840,147.00 7,227652.00 HOUSING FUND 1,100,000.00 1,132,495.00 DEBT SERVICE FUND 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 CIP FUND 3,658,298.75 3,658,298.75 TOTAL $ 20,340,359.75 $ 23,462,007.75 Lisa Shaffer (Jan 14, 2022 12:34 MST) BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2021-22 Budget Adjustments The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2022. Projections for fiscal year 2021 were better than expected, while projections for fiscal year 2022 continue to trend above budget. Sales tax for the first quarter was well above budget and the prior year. Franchise tax is lagging below budget from a decrease in water franchise ($250,000) and telephone ($150,000) franchise taxes. Other notable increases are licenses are above budget driven by increases in airport parking taxes and innkeepers tax. Permits remain very strong with increases in plan check fees and building permits. Field reservations, land leases and building leases are leading to an increase in Charges, Fees and Rentals. Notable decreases include a decrease in moving violations and justice court fines and fire reimbursement from the airport is also below budget. FY21-22 Variance Annual Revised Favorable Revenue Budget Forecast (Unfavorable) Property Taxes 112,726,044 112,726,044 - Sales and Use Tax 89,556,472 93,436,473 3,880,001 Franchise Tax 12,102,129 11,700,054 (402,075) PILOT Taxes 1,562,041 1,562,041 - TOTAL TAXES 215,946,686 219,424,612 3,477,926 License and Permits 29,904,360 34,561,893 4,657,533 Intergovernmental 4,644,018 5,166,761 522,743 Interest Income 1,271,153 1,271,153 - Fines & Forfeiture 3,474,455 3,425,328 (49,127) Parking Meter Collection 2,693,555 2,693,555 - Charges and Services 3,934,570 4,252,996 318,426 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,372,272 3,329,733 (42,539) Interfund Reimbursement 22,032,892 21,523,465 (509,427) Transfers 21,079,600 21,079,601 1 TOTAL W/OUT SPECIAL TAX 308,353,561 316,729,097 8,375,536 Sales and Use Tax - 1/2 cent 35,600,001 38,000,000 2,399,999 Sales and Use Tax - County Option - - - TOTAL GENERAL FUND 343,953,562 354,729,097 10,775,535 With the completion of the CAFR fund balance would be projected as follows for FY2021 and FY2022: With the use of fund balance from this budget amendment fund balance is projected to be at 21.29%. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 6,625,050 82,617,126 89,242,176 12,114,190 104,171,780 116,285,970 Budgeted Change in Fund Balance 2,924,682 (7,810,302) (4,885,620) (2,879,483) (15,335,334) (18,214,817) Prior Year Encumbrances (3,733,743) (6,165,453) (9,899,196) (1,879,654) (10,259,789) (12,139,443) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 5,815,989 68,641,371 74,457,360 7,355,053 78,576,657 85,931,710 Beginning Fund Balance Percent 14.51%23.16%22.13%18.22%24.71%23.98% Year End CAFR Adjustments Revenue Changes - - - - - - Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) - (5,676,583) (5,676,583) - (7,535,897) (7,535,897) Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 5,815,989 62,964,788 68,780,777 7,355,053 71,040,760 78,395,813 Final Fund Balance Percent 14.51%21.24%20.44%18.22%22.34%21.88% Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance (1,000,000) (15,858,313) (16,858,313) BA#1 Revenue Adjustment - - - - BA#1 Expense Adjustment - - 5,138,235 5,138,235 BA#2 Revenue Adjustment - - 490,847 490,847 BA#2 Expense Adjustment - - (986,298) (986,298) BA#3 Revenue Adjustment - - - - BA#3 Expense Adjustment - (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (2,000,000) BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - 1,508,044 1,508,044 BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - (4,242,779) (4,242,779) BA#5 Revenue Adjustment - - 400,000 400,000 BA#5 Expense Adjustment - - (400,000) (400,000) BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - - - - BA#6 Expense Adjustment - - (1,997,761) (1,997,761) BA#7 Revenue Adjustment - - - - BA#7 Expense Adjustment - - - - Change in Revenue 7,298,201 10,388,598 17,686,799 - - - Fund Balance Budgeted Increase - - - - - - - - Adjusted Fund Balance 12,114,190 57,495,073 69,609,263 6,355,053 69,951,048 76,306,101 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 30.21%19.40%20.69%15.75%22.00%21.29% Projected Revenue 40,095,707 296,422,894 336,518,601 40,359,137 317,980,599 358,339,736 2021 Projection 2022 Projection The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $20,340,359.75 of revenue and expense of $23,462,007.75. The amendment proposes changes in seven funds, including the addition of 16 new FTEs. The amendment also includes the use of $2,701,648.00 from the General Fund fund balance. The proposal includes 35 initiatives for Council review. A summary spreadsheet document, outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget opening is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ______ of 2022 Sixth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 In June of 2021, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2021. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning 2 July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2022. ________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________ Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed _________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. _________ of 2022. Published: ___________________. Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Senior City Attorney Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 Suazo Membership GF - 25,000.00 - - Ongoing - 2 Move Grants Manager from ARPA to GF Funding GF - 66,000.00 - - Ongoing 1.00 2 Move Grants Manager from ARPA to GF Funding Misc Grants - (80,000.00) - - Ongoing (1.00) 3 Healthcare Innovation - Biohive GF - 50,000.00 - - One-time - 4 Fix the Bricks Grant - Transfer Grant Funded PCN GF - - - - Ongoing - 5 Additional Sergeant for Special Victims Unit GF - 81,671.00 - - Ongoing 1.00 5 Additional Sergeant for Special Victims Unit GF - 54,300.00 - - One-time - 5 Additional Sergeant for Special Victims Unit Fleet 49,500.00 49,500.00 - - One-time - 5 Additional Sergeant for Special Victims Unit IMS 4,800.00 4,800.00 - - One-time - 6 Police Access Control Upgrade and Support GF - 214,538.00 - - One-time - 6 Police Access Control Upgrade and Support IMS 214,538.00 214,538.00 - - One-time - 7 Fireworks Budget GF - 25,000.00 - - One-time - 8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match GF - 364,030.00 - - Ongoing 10.00 8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match GF - 282,430.00 - - Ongoing - 8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match GF - 535,000.00 - - One-time - 8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match Fleet 495,000.00 495,000.00 - - One-time - 8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match IMS 40,000.00 40,000.00 - - One-time - 9 Arts Council Staff GF - 175,000.00 - - Ongoing 3.00 10 Allen Part Plan CIP [Project Rescope]CIP - - One-time - 11 Executive Assistant in Mayors Office GF - 39,792.00 Ongoing 1.00 12 Citywide Equity Study GF - 90,000.00 One-time - 13 Fuel Cost Increases GF - 498,887.00 Ongoing - 13 Fuel Cost Increases Fleet 938,076.00 938,076.00 Ongoing - 14 COVID PPE GF - 200,000.00 One-time - Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed Section A: New Items 1 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 ARPA HOME Admin and Planning Funds Misc Grants 176,660.00 176,660.00 - - One-time - 1 Interest Income on Bonding CIP 64,139.78 64,139.78 - - One-time - 1 Interest Income on Bonding CIP 80,976.97 80,976.97 - - One-time - 2 Housing Program Construction Costs Housing 1,100,000.00 1,100,000.00 - - One-time - 3 Reimburse Misc Grants for Unreimbursed HUD HOPWA Funds Misc Grants 32,495.00 - - - One-time - 3 Reimburse Misc Grants for Unreimbursed HUD HOPWA Funds Housing - 32,495.00 - - One-time - 4 Treasury ERAP 1 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 - - One-time - 5 Treasury ERAP 2 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants 2,880,366.00 2,880,366.00 - - One-time 6 Annex Building Renovation - Moving Funds from Misc Grants to CIP Misc Grants - 500,000.00 - - One-time - 6 Annex Building Renovation - Moving Funds from Misc Grants to CIP CIP 500,000.00 500,000.00 - - One-time - 7 State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan Debt Service 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 - - One-time - Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 UDOT Railroad Safety Grant CIP 86,750.00 86,750.00 - - One-time - 2 UDOT Railroad Safety Grant, Round 2 CIP 93,750.00 93,750.00 - - One-time - 3 Utah Dept. of Transportation, 600/700 N FREQUENT TRANSIT NETWORK IMP CIP 228,000.00 228,000.00 - - One-time - 3 Utah Dept. of Transportation, 600/700 N FREQUENT TRANSIT NETWORK IMP CIP (152,000.00) (152,000.00) - - One-time - 3 Utah Dept. of Transportation, 600/700 N FREQUENT TRANSIT NETWORK IMP CIP 152,000.00 152,000.00 - - One-time - 4 State of Utah, Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail CIP 1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 - - One-time - 4 State of Utah, Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail CIP 1,304,682.00 1,304,682.00 - - One-time - - Council Approved Section D: Housekeeping Section F: Donations Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Administration Proposed Council Approved Administration Proposed 2 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Consent Agenda #3 1 State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Distracted Driving Prevention Program Misc Grants 13,000.00 13,000.00 - - One-time - 2 State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program Misc Grants 9,690.00 9,690.00 - - One-time - 3 US Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 De- Escalation Training Solicitation Misc Grants 92,320.00 92,320.00 - - One-time - 4 US Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Misc Grants 59,360.00 59,360.00 - - One-time - 5 US Department of Justice, 2021 Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Misc Grants 340,246.00 340,246.00 - - One-time - 6 Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ) , State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) Misc Grants 10,000.00 10,000.00 - - One-time - 1 Utah State Office of Education, Child and Adult Care Food Program - Youth After School Programs Misc Grants 46,000.00 46,000.00 - - One-time - 2 Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Grant Program, Marathon Petroleum Foundation Misc Grants 100,000.00 100,000.00 - - One-time - 3 Mental Health First Responders, Utah Department of Human Services Misc Grants 80,010.00 80,010.00 - - One-time - Total of Budget Amendment Items 20,340,359.75 23,462,007.75 - - 15.00 Administration Proposed Council Approved Section I: Council Added Items Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards Consent Agenda #4 3 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund Class, Budget Amendment #6: General Fund GF - 2,701,648.00 - - 16.00 Fleet Fund Fleet 1,482,576.00 1,482,576.00 - - - IMS Fund IMS 259,338.00 259,338.00 - - - Miscellaneous Grants Fund Misc Grants 6,840,147.00 7,227,652.00 - - (1.00) Housing Fund Housing 1,100,000.00 1,132,495.00 - - - Debt Service Fund Debt Service 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 - - - CIP Fund CIP 3,658,298.75 3,658,298.75 - - - - - - Total of Budget Amendment Items 20,340,359.75 23,462,007.75 - - 15.00 Administration Proposed Council Approved 4 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2021-22 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2021-22 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total ^^ Total Through BA#5 ^^ General Fund (FC 10)367,582,070 (5,138,235.00) 986,298.00 2,000,000.00 4,242,779.00 400,000.00 370,072,912.00 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)2,033,573 2,033,573.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,550,000 1,550,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,699,663 7,098.00 5,706,761.00 Water Fund (FC 51)127,365,555 460,716.00 18,118.00 127,844,389.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)268,213,796 221,826.00 7,941.00 268,443,563.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)19,201,013 19,705.00 2,278.00 19,222,996.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)706,792,500 1,350,949.00 39,790.00 708,183,239.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)24,713,505 36,538.00 4,109.00 24,754,152.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)9,697,417 19,649.00 88,749.00 1,802,257.00 11,608,072.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)4,056,856 4,056,856.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)28,090,576 18,999.00 112,646.00 423,258.00 28,645,479.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)24,302,487 219,193.00 135,492.00 24,657,172.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69) 5,307,142 5,307,142.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,341,332 5,341,332.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)18,684,617 10,427,551.76 1,522,743.00 11,151,215.48 3,447,000.00 45,233,127.24 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)273,797 273,797.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)2,752,565 2,752,565.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)16,121,000 16,121,000.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)31,850,423 26,165,000.00 58,015,423.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)29,503,216 (150,753.00) 23,400,000.00 52,752,463.00 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)2,933,913 24,843.00 2,958,756.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)52,939,489 19,705.00 212,897.00 53,172,091.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,755,009,505 7,688,537.76 2,559,683.00 2,000,000.00 67,605,134.48 3,847,000.00 1,838,709,860.24 5 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 ^^ Total Through BA#5 ^^ BA #6 Total ^^ Total Through BA#6^^ General Fund (FC 10)370,072,912.00 2,701,648.00 372,774,560.00 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000.00 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)2,033,573.00 2,033,573.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,550,000.00 1,550,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,706,761.00 5,706,761.00 Water Fund (FC 51)127,844,389.00 127,844,389.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)268,443,563.00 268,443,563.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)19,222,996.00 19,222,996.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)708,183,239.00 708,183,239.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)24,754,152.00 24,754,152.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)11,608,072.00 11,608,072.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)4,056,856.00 4,056,856.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)28,645,479.00 1,482,576.00 30,128,055.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)24,657,172.00 259,338.00 24,916,510.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for 5,307,142.00 5,307,142.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,341,332.00 5,341,332.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)45,233,127.24 7,227,652.00 52,460,779.24 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)273,797.00 273,797.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)2,752,565.00 2,752,565.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)16,121,000.00 1,132,495.00 17,253,495.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)58,015,423.00 7,000,000.00 65,015,423.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)52,752,463.00 3,658,298.75 56,410,761.75 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)2,958,756.00 2,958,756.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)53,172,091.00 53,172,091.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,838,709,860.24 23,462,007.75 - - - - 1,862,171,867.99 BA#4 and BA#5 remain open with the City Council. Budget Manager Analyst, City Council Contingent Appropriation 6 Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 1 Section A: New Items A-1: Suazo Membership GF $25,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar For Questions Please Include: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar, Randy Hillier This funding would continue to allow Salt Lake City to be represented on the Suazo Board. According to the organization’s website, “The Suazo Business Center is a business Resource committed to the development and empowerment of the Latino/Hispanic and other underserved communities. We provide assistance to help existing and potential minority entrepreneurs succeed and build wealth.” The Administration stated Economic Development would identify a staff person to serve on the Board. A-2: Move Grants Manager from ARPA to GF Funding GF $66,000.00 Misc Grants -$80,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson For Questions Please Include: Mary Beth Thompson , John Vuyk The position associated with this move will be managing all grants, including ARPA. Since ARPA funds need to be specifically dedicated, this position doesn’t qualify for ARPA funding and will need to be moved to and funded by the General Fund. A-3: Healthcare Innovation - Biohive GF $50,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar For Questions Please Include: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar, Randy Hillier Salt Lake City has focused a substantial amount of economic recovery efforts on the healthcare innovation industry as a part of the Tech Lake City initiative. This industry has a strong presence in the City and has high growth potential. This industry is particularly strategic for the City as these jobs are anchor ed with research and development and have high potential for upward mobility. This funding will go towards a collaborative effort alongside industry partners to brand the industry, highlight opportunities within it for underserved communities, and elevate apprenticeships, internships, and upward career mobility. A-4: Fix the Bricks Grant – Transfer Grant Funded PCN GF $0.00 Department: Fire Prepared By: Clint Rasmussen For Questions Please Include: Clint Rasmussen, Randy Hillier Emergency Management recently integrated into the Fire Department. Its existing programs have improved, and new projects are in the works. Emergency Management has several federal grants that it manages including "Fix the Bricks". Part of this specific grant funds the salary/benefits of one FTE to help administer the program. It was determined that the 'Fix the Bricks' grant would be more appropriately administered in the Department of Community and Neighborhood's Housing Stability. This budget amendment would amend the staffing document to reflect the move of 1 PCN/FTE from Fire to Community and Neighborhoods. As the FTE is funded through the grant, no transfer of budget needs to occur. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 2 A-5: Additional Sergeant for Special Victims Unit GF $81,671.00 GF $54,300.00 Fleet $49,500.00 IMS $4,800.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith For Questions Please Include: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith, Sandee Moore Currently, the SVU Sergeant is supervising 12 detectives which is not manageable. SVU caseloads have continued to increase and additional detectives have been assigned to the squad over the past few years in an effort to manage the caseload. Also, over 700 Sexual Assault Kit Initiative (SAKI) kits were submitted a few years ago and the state lab has been making good progress, now returning Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) hits at an increasingly rapid rate. Due to the response of the State lab, we currently have over 400 CODIS hits from the SAKI kits producing cold case leads. These cases need follow up and investigation in a timely manner which we cannot facilitate without additional resources. The benefit of an additional Sergeant, outside rectifying the immense span of control currently handled by a single Sergeant, is the ability to focus efforts on the SAKI and cold case queue. Separating the functions of the squad, overseen by a second Sergeant, to investigate sex crimes committed against adults and children from cold cases, SAK cases, and lesser, but still serious sex crimes (voyeurism, sexual battery, gross lewdness, etc.) would reduce individual caseloads and allow for better case investigation of these crimes as well as increase our ability to make progress on the SAKI cases with CODIS hits. This request for an additional Sgt includes funding for fleet and IMS. This request facilitates an immediate need and future budget requests may be considered for two additional SAKI cold case detectives, overtime, or other resources to facilitate investigation of these cases in a timely manner. A-6: Police Access Control Upgrade and Support GF $214,538.00 IMS $214,538.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich, Captain Teerlink For Questions Please Include: Shellie Dietrich, Captain Teerlink, Sandee Moore, Aaron Bentley Budget request for an update of the security access control system at PSB and ancillary PD facilities. The current system needs to be replaced to prevent a critical failure of building security required for state compliance. PD has worked with facilities to identify a state contracted vendor that will provide the hardware, software and support for access control. The server that is specified in this system has capacity to add other city access control systems as the city system expands. Ongoing cost for support is $45,000 per year and is included in the initial cost for the first yea r. The Police Department has coordinated on this request with Facilities IMS and public works to ensure functionality for all departments as the system is expanded throughout the city. This request is for the first phase of the implementation that covers the police department system. A-7: Fireworks Budget GF $25,000.00 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Gregg Evans For Questions Please Include: Gregg Evans, Kristin Riker, John Vuyk The Public Lands Department Community Events group is requesting $25,000 from General Funds to cover the annual July firework shows that would occur during calendar year 2022. Due to the severe drought, we experienced this past summer the City Council cut the firework funding "one -time" from the FY22 budget. Due to the firework show contract requirements the FY22 show was already prepaid in March of FY21 to reserve the fireworks show in July of FY22. Cutting the funding in FY22 actually impacts the FY23 firework shows. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 3 This budget amendment request would reinstate those funds and provide spending authority to purchase the firework display in advance for the following fiscal year. A-8: Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match GF $364,030.00 GF $282,430.00 GF $535,000.00 Fleet $495,000.00 IMS $40,000.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith For Questions Please Include: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith, Sandee Moore The COPS Hiring Grant was funded by DOJ in 2019 and accepted by the City and approved by City Council. A condition o f the grant is that the 3-year project must be completed within a 5-year project period as extensions allow. This will require hiring in January or February of 2022 to facilitate the 3-year project period within the 5 years allowed. The requested budget would be the city portion of the hiring costs for FY 22. Funding would also be required in FY 23 and FY 24 . In FY 25, 6 months of funding would be the city portion and then the city would take on full budget for these 10 positions. The total grant funding is $1,250,000 which will equate to approximately 25% of the cost over 3 years. The 10 officer positions were identified to create a squad dedicated to addressing Violent Crime in the community. These positions, in conjunction with the cooperative Project Safe Neighborhoods program, will have a major impact on the ability to proactively work to reduce violent crime in the city by enforcement and prosecution. A-9: Arts Council Staff GF $175,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar For Questions Please Include: Ben Kolendar, Lorena Riffo Jensen, Jolynn Walz, Randy Hillier The Arts Council is in need of additional staffing support to accommodate duties shifted from the Mayor’s Advisor on Arts & Culture role. In addition, challenges remain to keep up with current workload, fundraising needs due to ZAP loss of qualifying expenditures, and new initiatives requested of the Arts Council. Attrition has been a challenge at the Arts Council due to workload. The request is for 3.0 FTEs which is approximately $350,000 in ongoing expenses and approximately $175,000 in FY22 if funded mid-year. The Arts Council currently has 6.5 FTE to run the full operations of a non-profit, the City’s growing public art program (including maintenance), the city’s arts grants program, programming such as Living Traditions and the Twilight Concert Series and serve as an ombudsman to the arts community. A-10: Allen Park Plan CIP Project Rescope CIP $0.00 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Gregg Evans For Questions Please Include: Kristin Riker, Lewis Kogan, Katherine Maus, Gregg Evans Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment to revise the scope of submitted CIP application for FY 2021 -2022. The original scope for Historic Structure Renovation and Activation at Allen Park included funding for structural and occupancy analysis of historic structures; drawings, plans and cost estimates for reconstruction of the George Allen Home, the "Rooster House," septic system removal, sewer line construction, water infrastructure, stabilization of exterior art pieces, and pedestrian stairway connections; and reconstruction of lighting and driveways. The current scope also lists reconstruction of the George Allen Home and "Rooster House" to serve as a small cafe with dining opportunities. Due to initial public engagement and feedback, Public Lands is requesting a scope change to engage in robust community and stakeholder engagement to create an Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan for Allen Park which will determine the future use of the structures. In order to preserve the strong community investment in the site, Public Lands believes it would be necessary to engage in extensive public engagement to inform a plan that will guide future management decisions and capital improvement projects in the Park. Public Lands is currently engaging with a consultant to complete a Cultural Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 4 Landscape Report, which will also influence the Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan and be completed in a timely manner, in conjunction with public engagement for the plan. Funding for an Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan for Allen Park was awarded in 2020 with reallocated emergency bond funding. However, it was ultimately discovered that it was not legally permit ted for bond funding to be utilized for a non- capital expense. Public Lands is currently utilizing the emergency bond funding for emergency repairs to minimize damage to the structures and the property, including but not limited to roof repair, restoring e xternal power to select structures, investigation and construction documentation for sewer and water line installation, failing appliance removal, septic infrastructure removal, etc. Project tasks within the new scope may include but are not limited to: - Robust community engagement with key stakeholders, the Sugarhouse community, and the broader public - Development of an Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan, informed by the Cultural Landscape Report and public engagement, to guide future management of the site including over-arching goals, specific projects, objectives and prioritization - Structural and occupancy analysis of the historic structures - Development of conceptual and construction documents, and cost estimates for adaptive reuse and activation projects listed in the Plan - Investigation into the feasibility of Allen Park becoming a Historic Landmark Site A-11: Executive Assistant in the Mayor’s Office GF $39,792.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Dawn Valente, John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk The budget proposes to increase staffing in the Mayor’s Office by one additional executive assistant. The budget is for five month’s salary and costs for computers and other supplies. A-12: Citywide Equity Study GF $90,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Kaletta Lynch, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk The City has been working with Keen Independent Research to review equity practices in the City. The Administration is seeking funding to continue to work with Keen in developing plans to bring equity to Salt Lake City. Funding will allow the City to work with the vendor through this fiscal year to complete the plans. A-13: Fuel Cost Increases GF $498,887.00 Fleet $938,076.00 Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dawn Valente, John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Lorna Vogt, Dawn Valente, Nancy Bean, Denise Sorensen, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk The City has seen an increase in fuel cost. The budget will provide Fleet funding to purchase the required fuel for the remainder of the fiscal year. The budget also proposes to transfer funding from personnel within the Police [$300,000] and CAN [$12,622] Department to cover fuel increases. The budget also proposes additional funding from Non- Departmental to cover the costs not covered by general fund department budgets. The fuel increase has also impacted the Public Utilities, Sustainability, and Golf funds. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 5 A-14: COVID PPE GF $200,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk, Lorna Vogt The City’s supply of masks and other PPE to combat COVID is depleting. This request is for an additional $200,000 to purchase additional supplies to keep citizens, visitors and employees safe in City owned buildings. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources B-1: ARPA HOME Admin and Planning Funds Misc Grants $176,660.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Melyn Osmond HUD has authorized the City to access 5% ($176,659.75) of admin and planning funds of the City's 2021 HUD HOME - ARPA award (total award, $3,533.195). HOME-ARPA funds are designated for housing opportunities for individuals experiencing homelessness. These admin and planning funds will facilitate admin for existing City staff and expenses related to the HUD-required HOME-ARPA Community Assessment. The Community Assessment will identify needs and opportunities to help direct the HOME-ARPA funds. Please see attached funding agreement. Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Interest Income on Bonding CIP $64,139.78 CIP $80,976.97 Department: Finance Prepared By: Jared Jenkins For Questions Please Include: Jared Jenkins, Brandon Bagley, Marina Scott, Mary Beth Thompson The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019A, were issued in October 2019 for the purpose of funding the reconstruction of City streets. The total par amount of the bonds issued were $17,540,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, the unspent bond proceeds have been earning interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect the actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from October 2020 through August 2021. The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020, were issued in September 2020 for the purpose of funding the reconstruction of City streets. The total par amount of the bonds issued were $17,745,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, the unspent bond proceeds have been earning interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect the actual proceeds available including accumulat ed interest from February 2021 through August 2021. D-2: Housing Program Construction Costs Housing $1,100,000.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Suzanne Swanson Recognize $1,100,000 in unbudgeted revenue for the purpose of offsetting increases in constructions costs for three affordable single-family homes currently in development. This revenue was not included in the initial budget due to the timing of other home sales in the Housing Program that generated the revenue. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 6 D-3: Reimburse Misc Grants for Unreimbursed HUD HOPWA Funds Misc Grants $0.00 Housing $32,495.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Suzanne Swanson Finance discovered that $32,494.55 was paid out to a subgrantee in 2017, but never reimbursed from HUD for HOPWA Cost Center 7261611. The HUD reimbursement deadline of three years has passed for these funds. Housing Stability has identified unrestricted funds from 7800404 Bank Pool Clearing to make the City whole. This budget amendment will facilitate the transfer of funds from a 78 Fund Class to a 72 Fund Class. D-4: Treasury ERAP 1 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants $3,000,000.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Suzanne Swanson The Treasury has reallocated unspent Emergency Rent Assistance Program (ERAP) 1 funds set -aside for the State of Utah by low-performing cities and made these funds available to apply for by high-performing cities, such as Salt Lake City. These reallocated funds are for direct client assistance only. To administer Salt Lake City’s initial ERAP 1 award, the City contracted with the State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services’ (DWS) online Utah Rent Relief application portal, https://rentrelief.utah.gov/. Coordinating with DWS, Housing Stability staff have determined that Salt Lake City could apply for $3,000,000 in reallocated ERAP 1. These funds will further assist Salt Lake City residents with deposit, rent, utilities, rent arrears, and utility arrears, again utilizing the Utah Rent Relief application portal. Note: This new request is separate from, and does not affect, the City’s other Treasury ERAP 1 ($6,067,033) and ERAP 2 ($4,800,559.40) awards. See attached funding agreement. (Note: 7262150-Treasury ERA Direct Financial Assistance, is the current Cost Center for ERAP 1 Direct Client Assistance) D-5: Treasury ERAP 2 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants $2,880,366.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Suzanne Swanson This budget amendment is to recognize the City's second allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act, Treasury Emergency Rent Assistance (ERAP) 2 funds, in the amount of $2,880,335.64, for the purpose of addressing housing stability for Salt Lake City residents. See attached funding agreement. The City approved the first allocatio n of the ERAP 2 funds in BA1 of FY 21-22, in the amount of $1,920,233.76. The City's total ERAP 2 award is $4,800,599.40. BA1 included the following budget items for those funds: Direct Client Assistance $1,632,199, and Community Partner Admin $288,034.76. To administer Salt Lake City’s first and second allocations of ERAP 2, the City will contract with the State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services’ (DWS) online Utah Rent Relief application portal, https://rentrelief.utah.gov/. The City has previously and successfully contracted with DWS for the City’s ERAP 1 funds. This budget amendment aligns with Treasury guidance on eligible activities and allowable percentage amounts for ERPA 2. In addition to further supporting Direct Client Assistance (deposits, rent, utilities, rent arrears, and utility arrears), an d the Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 7 associated Community Partner Admin to facilitate the prop er distribution of these funds, Housing Stability is requesting City Admin to support one (1) FTE, and funds to support Housing Stability services. Re: the one (1) FTE: Currently, the City’s ERAP 1 and 2 funds are being administered by 1 PTE. This positio n is necessary to facilitate the City administration, coordination, and compliance monitoring. This position was pervious approved by Council with ERAP 1 funding. Since then, the administration of these funds has demonstrated that a FTE is required. This one (1) requested position would be Grade 26, Community Development Grant Specialist, fully loaded for 39 months. (April 2022 - Jun 2025, at $34.50 an hour [$215,280], plus benefits [$53,820].Total $269,100.) This position would be fully funded by ERAP funding and would sunset when funding expires. Re: Housing Stability services: According to the Treasury, eligible “Housing Stability” services include: Case management, Eviction prevention, Eviction diversion programs, Mediation between landlords and tenants , Housing counseling, Fair housing counseling, Housing navigators or promotors that help households access ERA programs or find housing, Housing-related services for survivors of domestic abuse or human trafficking, Legal services or attorney’s fees related to eviction proceedings and maintaining housing stability, Specialized services for individuals with disabilities or seniors tha t support their ability to access or maintain housing. A public competitive process would receive applications from providers for eligible Housing Stability services. D-6: Annex Building Renovation – Moving Funds from Misc Grants to CIP Misc Grants $500,000.00 CIP $500,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Randy Hillier For Questions Please Include: Teresa Beckstrand, John Vuyk, Randy Hillier In Budget Amendment #2, the Council added an item totaling $500,000 in grant funding to be used for Annex Building Renovations. This amount was approved within the Miscellaneous Grants Fund. Since the associated annex building renovation should be done through CIP, the budget needs to be moved. D-7: State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan Debt Service $7,000,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Brandon Bagley For Questions Please Include: Marina Scott, Brandon Bagley, Jared Jenkins, Mary Beth Thompson On December 6, 2021, the City and the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) entered into a loan agreement which will be used to finance a portion of a neighborhood parking structure between 400 West and 500 West and 600 South and 700 South. The loan is expected to be repaid with funds allocated to the City by H.B. 244 (2021). The City has received funds for the State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the receipt of loan proceeds and the expenditure budget to disburse the proceeds for the project. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant CIP $86,750.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Mary Beth Thompson, Jon Larsen, Orion Goff The Dept. of Community & Neighborhood, Division of Engineering applied for and received $86,750 for the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 (round 1) for safety improvements to the railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South. Planned safety improvements include widening the roadway, improving sight distance by raising the street grade approach, adding sidewalk on the south side of the crossing, adding bike lanes, and replacing the railroad crossing signals . The funding plan is to request an additional $260,250 in the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 Round 2 competition to complete the funding package for the project. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 8 This grant has no match requirement. A public hearing was held 4/6/21 for the original grant application for this award. E-2: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant, Round 2 CIP $93,750.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Mary Beth Thompson, Jon Larsen, Orion Goff The Dept. of Community & Neighborhood, Division of Engineering applied for and received $93,750 for the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 (round 2) for safety improvements to the railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South. Planned safety improvements include widening the roadway, improving sight distance by raising the street grade approach, adding sidewalk on the south side of the crossing, adding bike lanes, and replacing the railroad crossing signals. This grant has no match requirement. A public hearing was held 12/7/21 for the original grant application for this award. E-3: Utah Department of Transportation, 600/700 N Frequent Transit Network Improvement CIP $228,000.00 CIP -$152,000.00 CIP $152,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Mary Beth Thompson, Jon Larsen, Orion Goff Salt Lake City Division of Transportation nominated 600/700 North Frequent Transit Network Improvements (Near Term) for $228,000 from the TTIF: Transit Projects funding. The project installs approximately 20 new Level III transit shelters along 600/700 North from 2200 West to 300 West. This grant has a match requirement of $152,000 coming from the Funding Our Futures sales tax transit funding. A public hearing was held 4/7/20 for the original grant application for this award. E-4: State of Utah, Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail CIP $1,300,000.00 Impact Fee $1,304,682.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Mary Beth Thompson, Kristin Riker The Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands received $1,300,000 for the Foothills Natural Area & Bonneville Shoreline Trailhead Infrastructure Improvements. The project proposes to construct five public access trailheads along the stretch of the Bonneville Shoreline Trail that runs through the Salt Lake City foothills between Emigration Canyon and Davis County. Proposed trailhead locations are: 1) Bonneville Boulevard near City Creek Canyon and U tah State Capitol, 2) Emigration Canyon near This Is The Place Heritage Park, 3) Popperton Park near the University of Utah, 4) 18th Avenue in the upper Avenues neighborhood, and 5) Victory Road northwest of the Utah State Capitol. This grant has a match requirement of $1,300,000. Parks & Public Lands has committed matching funds is from parks impact fees adopted in FY 2022 Capital Improvement Program for the Foothills Trailhead Development Phase II. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 9 A public hearing was held on 12/7/21 on the grant appl ication for this award. Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda #3 G-1: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Distracted Driving Prevention Program Misc. Grants $13,000.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond The Police Department applied for and received a $13,000 grant from the Utah Highway Safety Office for the 2022 Distracted Driving Prevention Program. The grant funding for overtime to conduct distracted driving enforcement/education shifts. A Public Hearing was held on 4/20/21 for the grant application on this award. G-2: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program Misc. Grants $9,690.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith/ Melyn Osmond The Police Department applied for and received a $9,690 grant from the Utah Highway Safety Office for the 2022 Salt Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program. This award is to fund Crosswalk enforcement/education overtime and Youth bicycle rodeo overtime. A Public Hearing was held on 4/20/21 for the grant application on this award. G-3: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 De-Escalation Training Solicitation Misc. Grants $92,320.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond The Police Department applied for and received a $92,320 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services through the FY21 Community Policing Development De-Escalation Training Program. The grant will fund the Apex Officer Interactive Crisis Intervention, De-Escalation and Force Options Virtual Reality Training Simulator. It will also provide funding for up to 20 officers to attend an ICAT (Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics) de-escalation train-the-trainer course as well as training staff overtime/supplies to implement the ICAT and virtual reality curriculums. The Apex Officer Virtual Reality Training System is a comprehensive solution that is designed to allow trainers the ability to give presentations and classes, conduct interactive testing and assessment, and provide immersive, hands -on scenario- based exercises with detailed debriefing and after-action review. ICAT is a training program that provides first responding police officers with the tools, skills, and options they need to successfully and safely defuse a range of critical incidents. The only costs b eing funded are for per diem, remaining travel costs will be covered by other funding sources. A Public Hearing was held on 10/5/21 for the grant application on this award. G-4: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Misc. Grants $59,360.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith/ Melyn Osmond The Police Department applied for and received a $59,360 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services through the FY21 Community Policing Development Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act. The grant will fund: Training for Employee Wellness and Peer Support Teams, Wellness Initiative and Chaplain Program Uniforms, Program Education and Marketing Materials, Class Supplies, Program Evaluation, Instructor Fees for Family Wellness Workshops, and Overtime. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 10 A Public Hearing was held on 9/7/21 for the grant application on this award. G-5: US Department of Justice, 2021 Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Misc. Grants $340,246.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond The Police Department applied for and received a grant award from the U.S. Department of Justice under the 2021 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) program. The total grant award is $340,246. Of that total the City will subaward $57,054.50 to the Unified Police Department and $57,054.50 to Salt Lake County (Sheriff's Office). The subaward amounts are determined by a federal funding allocation formula. The Police Department will use its award to provide training for sworn and civilian personnel, to support directed community policing overtime, and to purchase the following: a tactical robot, less lethal shotguns and ammo, tactical operation center throw phone capability enhancements, a laptop for Crime Lab FARO software, vest carriers and plates for Crime Lab personnel, LEAPS (Law Enforcement Automated Personnel Software), and camera systems for the Internal Affairs Unit and the HOP physical training facility. No Match is required. A Public Hearing was held on 10/5/21 for the grant application on this award. G-6: Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) Misc. Grants $10,000.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for additional grant funding and was awarded $10,000 from the State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), under the State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) program. The State is combining these new funds with the previously funded amount of $1,500. The funds will be used for an overt pole camera kit, Narcan nasal spray, and drug prevention/resource cards A public hearing was held 9/7/21 for this grant application. Consent Agenda #4 G-1: Utah State Office of Education, Child and Adult Care Food Program - Youth After School Programs Misc Grants $46,000.00 Department: CAN (Youth & Family) Prepared By: Kim Thomas / Melyn Osmond The Youth & Family Division of Public Services applied for and received a continuation grant offered annually by the Utah State Office of Education, under the Child and Adult Care Food Program. These funds are available to youth service providers as part of the At-Risk Snack Program to reimburse for the costs of snacks served to children participating in the after-school programs. Central City Rec. Center, Fairmont Park, Glendale Library, Liberty Park, Northwest Rec. Center, Ottinger Hall, the Youth and Family Division Office, and Sorenson Campus will receive reimbursement directly through the State Office of Education and will receive up to $46,000, based on qualified snack expenses. SLC is reimbursed on a monthly basis and only qualified healthy snacks and meals served to children participating in the after-school enrichment/education activities during the afterschool program hours are eligible for reimbursement. A public hearing will be held for the grant application. G-2: Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Grant Program, Marathon Petroleum Foundation Misc Grants $100,000.00 Department: CAN (Youth & Family) Prepared By: Ken Perko / Melyn Osmond The Division of Youth & Family Services applied for and received $100,000 in grant funding for the Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Program. The funding will be used to purchase two 14 -passenger vans that will be used by program staff to transport youth participants from a variety of neighborhood elementary schools to the YouthCity Northwest Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 11 Recreation center site for afterschool programming. No match is required. A public hearing will be held for this grant application. G-3: Mental Health First Responders, Utah Department of Human Services Misc Grants $80,010.00 Department: Human Resources Prepared By: Trent Steele / Melyn Osmond The Human Resource Dept. applied for and received $80,010 in grant funding for the Mental Health First Responders grant program from Utah Dept. of Human Services. The funding will be used to increase the capacity of the City's existing EAP (Employee Assistance Program), targeting first responders. The two clinicians currently under contract with ComPsych will increase their hours of availability to provide onsite, in person, telephone, and virtual counselling particularly emergency services for individuals who may be in crisis. The total hours will increase by 815 over the course of the pilot projecting. No match is required. A public hearing will be held for this grant application. Section I: Council Added Items Impact Fees ‐ Summary Confidential Data pulled 12/13/2021 Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area Area Cost Center UnAllocated Cash Notes: Impact fee - Police 8484001 471,211$ A Impact fee - Fire 8484002 1,644,113$ B Impact fee - Parks 8484003 11,709,246$ C Impact fee - Streets 8484005 6,585,173$ D 20,409,744$ Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month 202107 (Jul2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202108 (Aug2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202109 (Sep2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202110 (Oct2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Current Month 202111 (Nov2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202112 (Dec2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202201 (Jan2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202202 (Feb2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202203 (Mar2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202204 (Apr2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202205 (May2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202206 (Jun2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202207 (Jul2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202208 (Aug2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202209 (Sep2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202210 (Oct2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202211 (Nov2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202212 (Dec2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202301 (Jan2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202302 (Feb2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202303 (Mar2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202304 (Apr2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202305 (May2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202306 (Jun2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202307 (Jul2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202308 (Aug2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202309 (Sep2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202310 (Oct2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202311 (Nov2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202312 (Dec2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202401 (Jan2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202402 (Feb2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202403 (Mar2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202404 (Apr2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202405 (May2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202406 (Jun2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total, Currently Expiring through June 2021 0$ -$ -$ -$ 0$ Fiscal Quarter E = A + B + C + D Police Fire Parks Streets Total FY 2023Calendar Month FY 2022FY 2024 Impact Fees Confidential Data pulled 12/13/2021 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Police Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Police Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Police Allocation YTD Sum of Police Allocation Remaining Appropriation ReimbExcessPoliceCapacity IF 8422800 1,898,497$ -$ 1,898,497$ -$ Police'sConsultant'sContract 8419205 3,565$ -$ 3,565$ -$ Sugarhouse Police Precinct 8417016 10,331$ 10,331$ -$ -$ PolicePrecinctLandAquisition 8419011 239,836$ 239,836$ -$ -$ Eastside Precint 8419201 21,639$ 21,639$ -$ -$ A Public Safety Building Replcmn 8405005 14,068$ 14,068$ -$ 0$ Police Refunds 8418013 -$ -$ (3,588)$ 3,588.33$ Police Impact Fee Refunds 8421102 338,448$ -$ 68,100$ 270,348$ Grand Total 2,526,385$ 285,875$ 1,966,574$ 273,937$ Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Fire Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Fire Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Fire Allocation YTD E Sum of Fire Allocation Remaining Appropriation Fire refunds 8416007 82,831$ -$ -$ 82,830.52$ Fire Station #14 8415001 6,083$ 6,083$ -$ -$ Fire Station #14 8416006 44,612$ -$ -$ 44,612$ Fire Station #3 8415002 1,568$ -$ -$ 1,568.09$ Fire Station #3 8416009 565$ 96$ -$ 469$ Study for Fire House #3 8413001 15,700$ -$ -$ 15,700$ Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 4,941$ 3,021$ 1,862$ 58$ FY20 FireTrainingFac. 8420431 56,031$ -$ -$ 56,031$ B Grand Total 212,331$ 9,200$ 1,862$ 201,268$ Parks Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Parks Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Parks Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Parks Allocation YTD Sum of Parks Allocation Remaining Appropriation Cnty #2 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420426 88$ -$ 88$ -$ Parks and Public Lands Compreh 8417008 7,500$ -$ 7,500$ -$ Fairmont Park Lighting Impr 8418004 49,752$ 12,155$ 37,597$ -$ Fisher Carriage House 8420130 1,098,764$ 1,038,968$ 59,796$ -$ FY Warm Springs Off Leash 8420132 20,411$ -$ 20,411$ -$ Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 4,857$ 2,596$ 2,219$ 42$ Folsom Trail/City Creek Daylig 8417010 146$ -$ -$ 146$ Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 23,530$ 23,000$ -$ 530$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,110$ -$ -$ 1,110$ Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 224,247$ 188,467$ 34,134$ 1,646$ C 9line park 8416005 21,958$ 19,702$ -$ 2,256$ Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ JR Boat Ram 8420144 15,561$ -$ 7,763$ 7,798$ Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 12,795$ 4,328$ -$ 8,467$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 10,830$ -$ -$ 10,830$ Park refunds 8416008 11,796$ -$ -$ 11,796.28$ IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 58,014$ -$ 1,905$ 56,109$ Parks Impact Fee Refunds 8418015 101,381$ -$ -$ 101,381.06 UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 135,084$ 21,169$ 1,355$ 112,560$ FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 722,920$ 571,809$ 3,343$ 147,769$ Three Creeks West Bank NewPark 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$ 9Line Orchard 8420136 195,045$ 32,650$ -$ 162,395$ RAC Playground with ShadeSails 8422415 180,032$ -$ -$ 180,032$ Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 523,889$ 284,846$ 11,297$ 227,746$ Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 388,477$ 59,106$ 64,495$ 264,877$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 275,000$ -$ -$ 275,000$ Bridge to Backman 8418005 290,276$ 10,285$ 4,515$ 275,475$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Historic Renovation AllenParK 8422410 420,000$ -$ -$ 420,000$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 425,000$ -$ -$ 425,000$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 489,688$ 64,333$ -$ 425,355$ Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 431,000$ -$ -$ 431,000$ Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 510,000$ -$ -$ 510,000$ Green loop 200 E Design 8422408 610,000$ -$ -$ 610,000$ Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,094,430$ 8,302$ 25,921$ 1,060,208$ SLCFoothillsTrailheadDevelpmnt 8422412 1,304,682$ -$ -$ 1,304,682$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,343,904$ 107,850$ 121,172$ 3,114,882$ GlendaleWtrprk MstrPln&Rehab 8422406 3,200,000$ 21,800$ -$ 3,178,200$ Grand Total 16,694,447$ 2,471,367$ 403,507$ 13,819,573$ Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Street Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Street Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YTD Sum of Street Allocation Remaining Appropriation 700 South Reconstruction 8415004 2,449$ -$ 2,449$ -$ 9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 152,500$ 139,280$ 13,220$ -$ Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ 13,000$ -$ -$ 500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 32,718$ 16,691$ 16,027$ -$ Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 95,653$ 20,953$ 73,999$ 700$ D Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 1,444$ -$ -$ 1,444$ Gladiola Street 8406001 16,109$ 13,865$ -$ 2,244$ Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$ Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 25,398$ -$ -$ 25,398$ 900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 28,000$ -$ -$ 28,000$ 1700S Corridor Transfrmtn IF 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$ Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 35,392$ -$ -$ 35,392$ 200S TransitCmpltStrtSuppl IF 8422602 37,422$ -$ -$ 37,422$ Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 58,780$ 20,697$ -$ 38,083$ 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$ Transportatn Safety Imprvmt IF 8422620 44,400$ -$ -$ 44,400$ Local Link Construction IF 8422606 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 900 S Signal Improvements IF 8422615 70,000$ -$ -$ 70,000$ 400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 90,000$ -$ -$ 90,000$ Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 200,000$ -$ 12,484$ 187,516$ TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 302,053$ -$ -$ 302,053$ IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$ Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 2,250,220$ 290,460$ 1,216,451$ 743,309$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8419008 221,688$ 213,483$ 8,205$ -$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8420105 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 875,000$ 87,063$ -$ 787,937$ Grand Total 5,967,404$ 1,155,677$ 1,416,728$ 3,394,999$ Total 25,400,567$ 3,922,119$ 3,788,672$ 17,689,776$ E = A + B + C + D TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE UnAllocated Budget Amount 8484001 471,211$ $1,644,113 20,409,744$ 8484002 8484003 8484005 11,709,246$ 6,585,173$ Item B2 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:February 15, 2022 RE: Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendments for Former Fire Station #3 Properties at Approximately 1085, 1095, and 1097 East Simpson Avenue, and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive PLNPCM2021-00914 & PLNPCM2021-01007 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:February 15, 2022 RE: Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendments for Former Fire Station #3 Properties at Approximately 1085, 1095, and 1097 East Simpson Avenue, and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive PLNPCM2021-00914 & PLNPCM2021-01007 BRIEFING UPDATE At the February 1 briefing the Council expressed general support for the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments. A Council Member asked if the subject parcels are in the Sugar House Special Assessment Area (SAA). Administrative staff stated they believe so and later confirmed it isthey are. Another question focused on SAA payments and if the City would pay those. Council staff stated if the property was leased to a for-profit entity or for commercial use, then the City would make payments to the SAA. Those fees are often passed on to the lessee through a development agreement, or payments are made in lieu of the assessment. Details of how payments are made would need to be worked out. A request was made to for early community involvement before a request for proposal is issued. A council Member noted community engaged development being done for the Fleet Block. It was suggested a similar process be explored for the subject parcels. The following information was provided for the February 1, 2022 Council briefing. It is provided again for background purposes. The Council will be briefed about an ordinance that would amend zoning of Redevelopment Agency (RDA) properties at approximately 1085, 1095, and 1097 East Simpson Avenue from the current PL (Public Lands) zoning designation to CHSBD1 (Sugar House Central Business District 1) as shown in the image below. The proposal would also amend the Sugar House Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map Item Schedule: Briefing: February 1, 2022 Set Date: February 1, 2022 Public Hearing: February 15, 2022 Potential Action: March 1, 2022 Page | 2 for the properties from “Public Lands and Institutional” to “Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale.” It is anticipated the subject properties will be consolidated with adjacent property to the east for future development, but no development proposal is being considered at this point. Planning staff noted a future project would likely be a mixed-use development including housing and commercial uses. If approved by the Council, the subject properties’ zoning designation would match that of property to the east, which is also owned by the RDA. Properties to the north and south are privately owned and are also zoned CSHBD1. Fairmont Park and Aquatic Center are to the west and zoned OS (Open Space). Two buildings are on the subject properties. The first is the former fire station #3 which served the Sugar House neighborhood. A new station was built at 2425 South 900 East which serves the Sugar House community, and the former station is no longer being used. The second is a Sugar House Business District maintenance building used by crews that maintain the area’s public spaces. If the properties are used for future development a new location would need to be found for the maintenance building. Planning staff recommended and the Planning Commission forwarded a unanimous positive recommendation to the City Council on the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments. Area zoning map with subject properties shaded blue inside circle Image courtesy Salt Lake City Planning Division Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an update on plans to solicit development on this property, including whether a long-term lease is the preferred approach. The Council may also wish to further consider/discuss community input about future uses. 2. The Council may wish to ask the Administration if a space has been identified for maintenance needs in the business district, and if any funding is needed to secure that location? Page | 3 3. The Council may wish to ask the Administration if the potential future extension of the S-Line streetcar to the east would impact redevelopment of this property or if it should be coordinated? 4. Is the Council supportive of the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CSHBD1 Zoning Summary (21A.26.060 Salt Lake City Code) Purpose Statement The purpose of the CSHBD Sugar House Business District is to promote a walkable community with a transit oriented, mixed use town center that can support a twenty-four (24) hour population. The CSHBD provides for residential, commercial and office use opportunities, with incentives for high density residential land use in a manner compatible with the existing form and function of the Sugar House master plan and the Sugar House Business District. The tables below include standards for the CSHBD1 zoning designation. CSHBD1 Lot and Yard Standards Lot Width Lot Area Front/Corner Side Yard Interior Side Yard Rear Yard Building Coverage Buffer yard (Not applicable in this instance) None required None required None required Max setback of 15 feet None required None required No maximum Next to any residential zone: 7-foot landscaped yard. Next to single family: one additional foot setback for every 3 feet in height over 30 feet. SCHBD1 Building Height Standards Lot Width Minimum Height Maximum Height Design Review Residential Uses No minimum 105 feet When over 50 feet in height or if building is over 20,000 square feet in size. Non- residential Uses No minimum 30 feet; 75 feet if equal amount of non-residential and residential square footage; 105 feet if 90% of parking is structured and residential uses are provided off-site. When over 50 feet in height or if building is over 20,000 square feet in size. CSHBD1 Ground Floor Use Requirements Must be residential, retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. MASTER PLAN CONSIDERATIONS The subject parcels are within the area covered by the Sugar House Community Plan, adopted in 2005. The Plan’s future land use map designates the subject parcels as “Institutional and Public Lands,” which aligned with the previous use. As noted above, a new fire station was constructed at 2425 South 900 East. The Plan also recommends expanding the Sugar House Business District to include the subject parcels. It is Planning staff’s opinion the Plan supports changing the future land use map and zoning map to align with the recommended Business District expansion. Page | 4 ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Attachment C (pages 10-11) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. Planning staff found the proposed amendment does not conflict with applicable standards. PUBLIC PROCESS • September 27, 2021-Notice of the project and request for comments sent to the Sugar House Community Council. • September 28, 2021-Notice mailed to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the subject properties. Digital open house notice posted to the Planning Division website and emailed to Planning’s list serve. • October 11, 2021-Sugar House Community Council Land Use Committee presentation and discussion on the proposal. • November 1, 2021-Sugar House Community Council sent a letter expressing support for the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments. • November 24, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing notice sent to Planning Division list serve, posted on City and Utah Public Meeting websites. Public hearing notice posted on property. • December 8, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing. One person spoke at the hearing expressing support for the proposal. The Commission closed the hearing and voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. • The Sugar House Community Council forwarded a few comments received on the proposal. Most are generally supportive, with suggestions on what the land could be used for. These include a community-oriented project rather than luxury apartments; a senior center; or extension of the Fairmont Aquatic Center adding a recreation center. One commenter suggested retaining the property as open space, a public plaza or other public amenity. The Sugar House Community Council letter to Planning and public comments are found on pages 13-15 of the Planning Commission staff report. ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: PLNPCM2021-01007 Sugar House Community Plan Future Land Use Map and PLNPCM2021-00914 Zoning Map Amendment for the former Fire Station #3 property STAFF CONTACT: Nick Norris Planning Director, nick.norris@slcgov.com or 801-535-6173 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the proposed amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This proposal would change the future land use map found in the Sugar House Community Master Plan from “Public Lands and Institutional” to Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale” and change the zoning map from PL Public Lands to CSHBD1 Sugar House Central Business District 1. The purpose for the proposal is to consolidate the subject properties with the property to the east for future development. Both properties are owned by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City. There is no development proposal associated with this request. The subject properties include four parcels of land. All four parcels are included in the proposal. The total land area included in this proposal is approximately 0.75 acres. January 14, 2021 Lisa Shaffer (Jan 14, 2022 11:29 MST) 01/14/2022 01/14/2022 The property currently contains two buildings: one was the former fire station for the Sugar House neighborhood, and one contains a maintenance building for the business improvement district that maintains public spaces in the area. The subject properties are in an area that the Sugar House Community Plan identifies as an expansion of the Sugar House central business district. Updating the future land use map and the zoning map are consistent with the goals and policies recommended in the Sugar House Community Plan. PUBLIC PROCESS: The Sugar House Community Council was notified of the proposal on September 27, 2021, starting the 45-day public comment period. The Sugar House Community Council Land Use Committee discussed the item at their October 11, 2021 meeting. Property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified of the 45-day public comment period. Information was posted on the Planning Division website and the notices provided a link to the online information. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 8, 2022. The public hearing was noticed by a direct mailing to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the subject properties, posted on the City and Statue of Utah Public Notice website, emailed to the Planning Division list serve, and signs were posted on the property advertising the meeting. After he public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted a motion recommending that the City Council adopt the proposal. More detailed information on public input can be found in the Planning Commission staff report. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of December 8, 2021 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of December 8, 2021 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of December 8, 2021 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3) Original Petition 4) Mailing List 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2021 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 1085 East Simpson Avenue, 1095 East Simpson Avenue, 1097 East Simpson Avenue, and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive to rezone those properties from PL Public Lands District to CSHBD1 Sugar House Business District) and amending the Sugar House Community Plan Future Land Use Map) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 1085 East Simpson Avenue, 1095 East Simpson Avenue, 1097 East Simpson Avenue and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive to rezone those properties from PL Public Lands District to CSHBD 1 Sugar House Business District pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2021-00914 and amending the Sugar House Community Future Land Use Map pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2021- 01007. WHEREAS, Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a petition to rezone properties located at 1085 East Simpson Avenue, 1095 East Simpson Avenue, 1097 East Simpson Avenue and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive to rezone those properties from PL Public Lands District to CSHBD1 Sugar House Business District pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2021-00914 and amending the Sugar House Community Future Land Use Map with respect to the property from Public Lands and Institutional to Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2021-01007; and WHEREAS, at its December 8, 2021 meeting, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said applications; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on this matter, the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 2 SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the properties located at 1085 East Simpson Avenue, 1095 East Simpson Avenue, 1097 East Simpson Avenue and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive (Tax ID Nos. 16- 20-252-001; 16-20-252-002; 21-20-252-003 and 16-20-252-005), which are more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, are rezoned from PL Public Lands District to CSHBD1 Sugar House Business District. SECTION 2. Amending the Sugar House Community Master Plan. The Future Land Use Map of the Sugar House Community Master Plan shall be and hereby is amended to change the future land use designation of the properties identified in Exhibit “A” from Public Lands and Institutional to Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of ____________, 2022. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 3 Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2022 Published: ______________. APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney December 20, 2021 4 Exhibit “A” Legal descriptions of the properties to be rezoned: Parcel 16-20-252-001 COM AT NW COR LOT 4 BLK 3 GRANITE SUB PLAT A S 0^14’48” W 151.61 FT N 46^19’51” W 60.28 FT NW’LY ALG CURVE TO LEFT 202.5 FT S 89^45’15” E 211.65 FT S 0^14’48” W 1.31 FT TO BEG0.32 AC BEING IN LOT 11 BLK 45 10 AC A. Parcel 16-20-252-002 COM NW COR LOT 4, BLK 3, GRANITE SUB PLAT “A”, SE’LY ALG CURVE TO RIGHT 105.05 FT; S 43^40’09” W 119.64 FT; N 0^14’48” E 151.61 FT TO BEG. Parcel 16-20-252-003 COM N 0^14’48” E 47 FT FR SW COR LOT 4, BLK 3, GRANITE SUB PLAT A; S 46^19’51” E 68.15 FT; S 89^56’ E 53.396 FT; N 0^14’48” E 109.306 FT; NW’LY ALG CURVE TO L 31.88 FT; S 43^40’09” W 119.641 FT TO BEG. Parcel 16-20-252-005 COM AT NW COR LOT 4, BLK 3, GRANITE SUB PLAT A, SE’LY ALG CURVE TO R 136.933 FT; N 0^14’48” E 46.093 FT; NW’LY ALG CURVE TO L 64.526 FT; N 89^45’15” W 54.792 FT TO BEG. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. MAILING LIST 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2021-00914 and PLNPCM20221-01007 August 23, 2021 The mayor initiated a petition to update the community master plan and zoning of the property where the former Sugar House Fire Station was located. September 27, 2021 Petition assigned to Nick Norris, Planning Director, for staff analysis and processing. September 28, 2021 Petition routed to each City Department and Division for review and comment. September 28, 2021 Early engagement period started by sending an email containing preliminary information sent to all Community Council Chairs informing them of the proposed text amendments, and that Planning Commission and City Council meetings would be scheduled in the future. Notice also sent to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the proposal. September 28, 2021 Public information posted to the Planning Division website explaining the proposal and containing proposed text of code changes. September 28, 2021 Email notice of the digital open house sent to the Planning Division list- serve. This email is sent every two weeks with each item that is in the public engagement phase. October 11, 2021 Presentation to the Sugar House Land Use Committee. November 24, 2021 Public notice for December 20, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing sent to Division list serve, posted on city website, and posted on Utah Public Meeting website. Property posted with sign advertising publich earing. December 8, 2021 Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and conducted a public hearing. The Planning Commission adopted a motion recommending that the City Council adopt the proposal. 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition P:NPCM2021-00914 and PLNPCM2021-01007 – A petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to amend the Sugar House Community Master Plan and the Salt Lake City Zoning Map for properties located at approximately 1085 Simpson (2 parcels with the same address), 1095 Simpson, 1097 Simpson and 1104 Sugarmont Drive. The proposal would modify the future land use designation in the Sugar House Community Plan from "Public Lands and Institutional" to " Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale" and the zoning map from PL Public Lands to CSHBD-1 Central Sugar House Business District 1. The purpose of the proposal is to facility the future development of the site. No development proposals are being considered at this time. The City Council may consider other future land use designations or zoning districts as part of this proposal. DATE: Date #1 and Date #2 TIME: 7:00 p.m. All persons interested and present will be given an opportunity to be heard in this matter. This meeting will be held via electronic means, while potentially also providing for an in- person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. If you are interested in participating during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting, please visit the website www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings/ or call 801-535-7654 to obtain connection information. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Nick Norris at 801-535-6173 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at nick.norris@slcgov.com People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY 669 WEST 200 SOUTH       SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SUGARHOUSE VETERINARY HOSPITAL BUILDING PTRN 2206 S MCCLELLAND ST     SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK PO BOX 54288             LEXINGTON KY 40555 SUGARMONT LLC 2121 S MCCLELLAND ST #303 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 S STATE ST # 425     SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 SUGARHOUSE DIXON, LLC 11 SPANISH BAY DR        NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 SALT LAKE COUNTY PO BOX 144575            SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 145460            SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 S STATE ST           SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 SALT LAKE CITY PO BOX 145460            SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 SALT LAKE CITY CORP.PO BOX 145460            SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 Unknown PO BOX 145518            SALT LAKE CITY UT  UT 84114 YORK FAMILY 2257, LLC 2257 S 1100 E            SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK OF SALT LAKE CITY UTAH 425 PIKE ST # BRO79      SEATTLE WA 98101 CMRK LLC; RLR INVESTMENTS #1 LLC 2280 S HIGHLAND DR       SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 DEE'S SUGARHOUSE INVESTMENTS LLC 777 E 2100 S             SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 Current Occupant 975 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2200 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2220 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2191 S MCCLELLAND ST Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1055 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1044 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1040 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1085 E SIMPSON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1095 E SIMPSON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1097 E SIMPSON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1104 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1116 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2234 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2262 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2274 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2227 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2201 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106 Nick Norris c/o Planning Division PO BOX 145480 Salt Lake City UT 84111 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLCGOV.COM PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-5357757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Staff Report To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Nick Norris Planning Director Date: December 1, 2021 Re: PLNPCM2021-01007 Sugar House Community Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment and PLNPCM2021-00914 Zoning Map Amendment Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendment PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1085 Simpson (2 parcels with the same address), 1095 Simpson, 1097 Simpson and 1104 Sugarmont Drive. PARCEL ID: 16-20-252-001; 16-20-252-002; 16-20-252-005; 16-20-252-003; 16-20-252-004 MASTER PLAN: Sugar House Community Plan ZONING DISTRICT: Current zoning designation is PL Public Lands, proposed zoning designation is CSHBD1 Sugar House Central Business District MEETING DATE: December 8, 2021 REQUEST: Mayor Erin Mendenhall has initiated an amendment to the Sugar House Community Master Plan and the Salt Lake City Zoning Map for properties located at 1085 Simpson (2 parcels with the same address), 1095 Simpson, and 1104 Sugarmont Drive. The proposal would modify the future land use designation in the Sugar House Community Plan from "Public Lands and Institutional" to " Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale" and the zoning map from PL Public Lands to CSHBD-1 Central Sugar House Business District 1. The purpose of the proposal is to facilitate the future development of the site. No development proposals are being considered at this time. The property is in City Council District 7, represented by Amy Fowler. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information in this staff report and the factors to consider for zoning map, Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to the City Council regarding this proposal. ATTACHMENTS: A. Vicinity Map B. Existing Conditions C. Analysis of Standards D. Public Process and Comments E. Dept. Comments furnishings, lighting, and landscaping or a delineated and developed open space system of the same character. The street level businesses are commercial and retail in nature, while the upper levels can be either residential or office depending on compatibility of the adjacent uses. Town Center Scale Mixed Use occurs primarily in the core area of the Business District surrounded by the Neighborhood Scale Mixed Use. The Sugar House Community Plan also includes a section about the expansion of the Sugar House Business District. The expansion area recommended in the plan includes the subject property (the map below can be found on Page 16 of the plan). The subject property is within the red circle on the map. Based on this, the plan supports the proposal to officially change the designation on the future land use map and the zoning map to align with the recommendations in the Sugar House Community Plan. The future land use map in the Sugar House Community Plan is proposed to be updated so that it matches the surrounding property and reflects the zoning. Furthermore, the update helps implement the plan by matching the proposed expansion of the Sugar House Business District. Proposed Zoning Map Amendment The purpose of the zoning map amendment is to match the zoning of the property directly to the east, which is also owned by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City. The intent is to combine the properties and then develop the site. A proposal to amend the zoning map of the city is subject to the factors found in 21A.50 of the Zoning Code. It is important to note that the factors are not standards and that the proposal does not need to comply with each factor listed. This is considered a legislative action and the Planning Commission is legally required to make a recommendation to the City Council. The standards from 21A.50.050 that apply to zoning map amendments are found in Attachment C. The subject property (indicated in the red circle) is proposed to change from PL to CSHBD1 PUBLIC INPUT This proposal is subject to the 45-day engagement process outlined in City Code. Notice was provided to the surrounding property owners and the Sugar House Community Council on September 27, 2021. The 45-day public input period ended on November 12, 2021. The proposal was presented to the Sugar House Community Council Land Use Committee on October 11, 2021. The Sugar House Community Council provided a letter outlining their position that can be found in attachment D. Several other comments were submitted to the Sugar House Committee Council that can also be found in attachment D. The comments are summarized below: • Sugar House Community Council: The community council stated, “We believe this change is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the City through the Sugar House master plan.” The letter does not identify any issues to consider with the proposal. • Other Public Comments received: o it makes sense to rezone the property to match the zoning of the parcel to the East. o the rezoning should be approved, but nor for more luxury apartments and would prefer a truly community-oriented project for everyone. o Would love the site to be a senior center. o Would prefer to see the site be retained as public lands and used for open space, a public plaza, or some other public amenity that can service the growth in the neighborhood. o Should be an extension of the Fairmont Aquatic Center, Sugar House needs a rec center. Response to Public Input: The proposal does not include any development proposals at this time, but it is highly likely that a future project would be a mixed-use development that includes housing and commercial uses. It is highly likely that the site will be used as open space given the proximity to Fairmont Park and the S Line, but the opportunity for some public space on the site and the site to the east would be possible with the proposed zoning change. Those details will be determined by the Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency. The RDA Board ultimately determines what sort of community benefits and uses are included in an RDA project. The RDA Board holds public hearings and receives public input on these proposals. Those that are interested in providing input on the future development are encouraged to visit the RDA website to learn more about RDA projects and for ways to be involved: https://slcrda.com/ The proposal has not been modified based on the public comment received as of November 29, 2021 and there are no proposed modifications being recommended by the Planning Division. IMPACTS: The proposal is not anticipated to have significant impacts to the area. No existing residents or businesses will be displaced by this proposal. The existing Sugar House Business District facility will have to be relocated or included in the future development of the site. That is an issue that can be resolved by the RDA and the Public Services Department and does not require any specific action or recommendation from the Planning Commission. NEXT STEPS: The City Council is the final decision maker regarding zoning map amendments and will consider the proposal regardless of the Planning Commission’s recommendation. If approved by the City Council, the RDA would likely start the process of seeking out a development partner to come up with a development plan for the property. Any future development would have to comply with the zoning approved by the City Council and any conditions or agreements decided by the City Council. It is typical that developments using RDA land and/or resources to include requirements that align with city goals. Common examples of requirements include affordable housing units, public space, energy efficiency, and other benefits that are determined as part of the solicitation for development. These are just examples and no decisions have been made regarding what may be required in any development proposal. ATTACHMENT A: VICINITY MAP Subject property outlined in red ATTACHMENT B: Existing Conditions Current Zoning: PL Public Lands Proposed Zoning: CSHBD Sugar House Business District 1 CSHBD1 Purpose Statement: The purpose of the CSHBD Sugar House Business District is to promote a walkable community with a transit oriented, mixed use town center that can support a twenty-four (24) hour population. The CSHBD provides for residential, commercial and office use opportunities, with incentives for high density residential land use in a manner compatible with the existing form and function of the Sugar House master plan and the Sugar House Business District. Allowed Uses: a mix of uses typically found in an urban neighborhood such as this. Dense residential buildings, ground floor commercial uses on primary streets, a mix of retail and restaurants, office buildings, retail service, and public uses are found in the business district. Building Height varies based on the use. Residential buildings can potentially be as tall as 105 feet. Nonresidential uses are limited to 30 feet. Mixed use buildings that contain residential can go up to 105 feet in some instances. Setbacks: There are no minimum setbacks in the zoning district. There is a maximum setback of 15 feet, which means no building can be more than 15 feet from a front property line. Public Review Processes: • Conditional Uses: some uses are required to obtain conditional use approval and are subject to a 45-day early engagement period. • Design Review if buildings are over a certain height or over a certain square footage the 45-day engagement period applies. Minor modifications to a building design standard are not subject to the 45-day engagement period. Surrounding Properties Future Land Use Current Zoning Current Use East Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale CSHBD1 Commercial (vacant building) South Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale CSHBD1 Commercial West Open Space Open Space Fairmont Park and Fairmont Aquatic Center North Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale CSHBD1 Apartments, Commercial CSHBD1 Zoning Summary 21A.26.060 ATTACHMENT D: Public Process and Comments The proposal was sent to the Sugar House Community Council on September 27, 2021 with a 45-day comment period that expired on November 12, 2021. The Sugar House Community Council Land Use Committee met on October 11, 2021 to discuss the proposal. The Sugar House Community Council provided a letter of support for the proposal and included comments received related to the proposal. Those comments follow. Norris, Nick From:Judi Short <judi.short@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 3, 2021 10:36 AM To:Norris, Nick Subject:(EXTERNAL) Fwd: Rezone the Old SH Fire Station to CSHBD2 Here is an additional comment about the fire station rezone.  Judi    ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Heather Hendrikse   Date: Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 10:39 PM  Subject: Rezone the Old SH Fire Station to CSHBD2  To:       From: Heather Hendriksen   Subject:Rezone the Old SH Fire Station to CSHBD2  The former fire house and Deseret Industries should be turned into an extension of Fairmont Aquatic center making it an  actual rec center similar to the county facilities throughout the county. Sugar House needs a county rec center.  Ideas  could include a basketball court with an indoor track, racquetball courts, fitness and weight equipment. I wonder if you  could even close the road behind the aquatic center and build a little bigger since there’s a road next to the apartments  being built where Granite Furniture used to be.        ‐‐   This email was sent from a contact form on Sugar House Community Council (https://www.sugarhousecouncil.org )        ‐‐   Judi Short      ATTACHMENT E: Deparment Comments The proposal was routed to the following Departments. The comments that follow are what was provided. • Building Services (Heather Gilcrease): No comments provided • Economic Development (Lorena Riffo Jenson) Business Development supports the zoning change to “Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale,” and encourages that the zoning changes promotes commercial space and especially small-scale retail. • Engineering (Scott Weiler): Engineering has no objections to this. • Transportation (Kevin Young) No comments provided • Public Utilities (Jason Draper): No utility objections to the proposed master plan and zoning map amendment. Redevelopment of this property may require relocation of storm drain facilities and may require utility improvements for water and sewer service. • Police Department (Lamar Ewell): no comments provided • Sustainability (Debbie Lyons) No comments provided • Parks and Public Lands (Kristen Riker) No comments provided • Public Services (Lorna Vogt): Inquired about how the zoning change impacts the existing maintenance building for the Sugar House Business Improvement District. The use is considered a conditional use in the proposed zone and if relocated to another site in the zoning district would need a new conditional use. If incorporated into a new development it may require a new conditional use. • Redevelopment Agency (Danny Walz); no direct comments provided; however, the RDA owns the property and requested the zoning change. Item B3 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:February 15, 2022 RE: 1193 West California Avenue Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2021-00914 & PLNPCM2021-00709 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:February 15, 2022 RE: 1193 West California Avenue Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2021-00914 & PLNPCM2021-00709 BRIEFING UPDATE At the February 1 briefing the Council expressed general support for the proposed zoning map amendment. A Council Member asked if the Council can ensure potential ADUs on the properties are constructed. Planning staff stated they cannot be required. Planning also noted the applicant expressed plans to retain ownership of the parcels for family members to occupy. A question was asked about whether ADUs are a permitted or conditional use within the R-1/5,000 zoning designation. Planning staff stated interior ADUs are permitted and detached ADUs are a conditional use. They further stated the Planning Commission intends to initiate the process to make all ADUs a permitted use. A Council Member asked about curb cut placement if the zoning map amendment is adopted. Planning staff stated development plans have not been submitted at this point. Details such as curb cuts would be addressed during plan review. Note: A Council staff report was not prepared for this item. Item Schedule: Briefing: February 1, 2022 Set Date: February 1, 2022 Public Hearing: February 15, 2022 Potential Action: March 1, 2022 ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2021-00709 1193 W California Avenue Zoning Map Amendment STAFF CONTACT: Amanda Roman, Principal Planner amanda.roman@slcgov.com or (801) 535-7660 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the proposed Zoning Map amendment. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Kesaia Young, the property owner of 1193 W California Avenue, initiated a petition to amend the Zoning Map in July of 2021. The request is to rezone the property from R-1/7,000 (Single Family Residential) to R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential). On October 27, 2021, the Planning Commission heard the petition and forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council to amend the Zoning Map. If approved, the property owner intends to subdivide the property and build two new single family homes that will potentially include two attached ADUs. The property owner anticipates retaining ownership of both properties. The proposed rezone is compatible with the platted South Salt Lake subdivision and reflects the existing development pattern, which consists of single- and two-family dwellings on lots less than 7,000 square feet in size. The permitted and conditional land uses are identical in both the R- 1/7,000 and R-1/5,000 zones. January 14, 2021 Lisa Shaffer (Jan 14, 2022 11:28 MST) 01/14/2022 01/14/2022 In addition to the difference in minimum lot square footage, the R-1/5,000 zone also has reduced rear and side yard building setbacks. The proposed change would allow for the subdivision of the property but is not expected to change the character of the neighborhood or have adverse impacts on future growth. If the zoning map amendment is approved, the property owner would be allowed to redevelop the site in accordance with the R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential) zoning district standards and permitted land uses. PUBLIC PROCESS: •Information concerning this petition was sent to the chair of the Glendale Community Council on July 27, 2021. o The Glendale Community Council did not provide formal comments. •The surrounding property owners within 300’ received an early notification by mail on July 28, 2021. •Public notification for the Planning Commission Hearing was mailed October 15, 2021 to all neighbors within 300’ of the Zoning Map amendment site. •The petition was heard by the Planning Commission on October 27, 2021. The Planning Commission voted unanimously (8-0) to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. o There were no public comments received prior to or during the Planning Commission meeting. California Avenue 1200 West Emery St. Concord St. Subject Property PLANNING COMMISSION RECORDS of OCTOBER 27, 2021: Planning Commission Agenda Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Staff Report EXHIBITS: 1. Project Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Hearing 3. Original Petition 4. Mailing List SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2022 (Amending the zoning of property located at approximately 1193 West California Avenue from R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential District to R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential District) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located approximately 1193 West California Avenue from R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential District to R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00709. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 27, 2021 on an application submitted by Kesaia Young (“Applicant”), property owner, to rezone property located at 1193 West California Avenue (Tax ID No. 15-14-104-001) (the “Property”) from R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential District to R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00709; and WHEREAS, at its October 27, 2021 meeting, the planning commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said application; and WHEREAS, following a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Property identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be and hereby is rezoned from R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential District to R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential District. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2022. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2022. Published: ______________. Ordinance rezoning 1193 W California Avenue APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney January 3, 2022 EXHIBIT “A” Legal Description of Property to be Rezoned: 1193 W California Avenue Tax ID No. 15-14-104-001 0702 BEG S 7.5 FT FR NW COR LOT 1, BLK 2, SOUTH SALT LAKE SUB; S 92.4 FT; E 128.8 FT; N 94.63 FT; W'LY 129.8 FT TO BEG 4902-1099 5426-1472 5460-3011 6238-1762 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.Project Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3. Original Petition 4. Mailing List 1. Project Chronology PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PETITION: July 12, 2021 July 20, 2021 July 27, 2021 July 28, 2021 July 30, 2021 September 10, 2021 October 15, 2021 October 15, 2021 October 27, 2021 PLNPCM2021-00709 - 1193 W California Avenue Zoning Map Amendment Petition for the zoning map amendment received by the Salt Lake City Planning Division Petition assigned to Amanda Roman, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. Information about the proposal was sent to the Chair of the Glendale Community Council in order to solicit public comments and start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment period. Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal. The Online Open House period started on July 30, 2021 and ended on September 10, 2021. The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. No formal comments were submitted to staff by the recognized organizations to date related to this proposal. Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting of October 27, 2021. Public hearing notice mailed. Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on October 27, 2021. By a unanimous vote of 8-0, the Planning Commission forwarded a Positive recommendation to City Council for the proposed zoning map change. 2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2021-00709 1193 W California Avenue Zoning Map Amendment – Salt Lake City received a request from Kesaia Young, the property owner, to amend the zoning map for a property located at approximately 1193 W California Avenue. The proposal would rezone the entire property from R-1/7,000 (Single Family Residential) to R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential). The amendment would allow the property to be subdivided into two lots that each meet the minimum lot area for a single-family dwelling. The Master Plan is not being changed. The property is located within Council District 2, represented by Dennis Faris. (Staff contact: Amanda Roman at 801-535-7660 or amanda.roman@slcgov.com) As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b). Please visit https://www.slc.gov/council/news/featured-news/virtually-attend-city- council-meetings/ to learn how you can share your comments live during electronic City Council meetings. If you would like to provide feedback or comment, via email or phone, please contact us at: 801-535-7654 (24- Hour comment line) or by email at: council.comments@slcgov.com . If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Amanda Roman at 801-535-7660 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at amanda.roman@slcgov.com. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.(P 19-19) 3. Original Petition Linda Mitchell Accepted - July 12, 2021 PLNPCM2021-00709 Zoning Amendment Questionnaire Parcel Number: 15141040010000 1.A statement declaring the purpose of the zoning amendment: The proposed Master Plan zoning amendment change from the R-1-7000 designation to a R-1-5000 designation supports the Westside Master Plan and 5YP for community growth through the subdivision of a large, underutilized lot. This Master Plan zoning amendment will enable the parcel to support more housing by subdividing the lot to build single-family homes with ADUs on each lot. The Growing SLC: Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 (“5YP”) acknowledges that “such options would also help restore the ‘missing middle’ housing types…restoring choices for a wider variety of household sizes, from seniors to young families” (5YP pg. 19). The proposed development would allow for two single family homes with ADUs on the large, underutilized lot while blending into the existing neighborhood and provide housing solutions for diverse demographics (students, seniors, young families, multi-generational families). The development can further materialize the objectives stated in the Five Year Housing Plan. The first Goal expounded in the Five Year Plan recognizes the need to “increase housing options…by seeking policy reforms that can enhance the flexibility of the land-use code and create an efficient and predictable development process for community growth” (5YP pg. 17). 2.A description of the proposed zoning amendment: The property is currently zoned as R-1-7000 Glendale Residential Neighborhood in the Westside Community. The purpose of the R-1-7000 Glendale residential neighborhood is to promote lots not less than seven thousand (7,000) square feet in size, suitable for parts of Glendale locations. The proposed zoning designation for the property is R-1-5000; a zoning designation that allows for a majority of single family homes, up to twenty eight eight feet (28’) in height measured to the ridge of the roof. The master plan zoning amendment would continue to allow lots not less than seven thousand (7,000) square feet in size as envisioned in the Glendale residential neighborhood zoning, and would further provide the flexibility to enhance housing type diversity in the neighborhood. 3.List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area: The current zone does not accurately reflect much of the existing housing stock adjacent to the subject property. In fact, the surrounding land uses, with the exception of the southern boundary and across the street along the western boundary, are much more dense than what could be built on the subject property under the current zone. Adjoining this property to the east is duplex on a lot less than five thousand (5,000) square feet in size, as well as a single-family residential home on a lot less than five thousand (5,000) square fees in size. One block to the east is a two story, stacked condominium complex zoned RMF-35, arguably the most dense zoning island of property in the area. Across California Avenue to the north are single family homes in the R-1-5000 Glendale zone, and duplex multi-family homes in the R-2 Glendale zone, which is the reasoning behind the proposed change of zoning that would be consistent with the majority of adjoining homes and neighborhood directly across California Avenue. Glendale is a unique and historic neighborhood including single-family and two-family dwellings with a variety of yards, lot sizes, and bulk characteristics. The RMF-35 zone is really the outlier in an area that is mostly surrounded by single-family and duplex housing types. Rezoning the property to R-1-5000 will provide the ability to add additional housing that blends well with neighboring community. At the same time the rezoning of the property will allow for the “underutilized parcel to allow for small lot single-family residential…with ADU…in fill development…that will meet size and design standards to ensure community compatibility,” which is envisioned in Salt Lake City’s The Westside Master Plan (WMP pg. 33). 4.Is the request amending the zoning map? The request is amending the Zoning Map. The parcel number to be changed is 15141040010000. 5.Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance? there is no request to amend the text. 4. Mailing List OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STATOWN_ZIP STEFAN JULIUS NIEDERAUER; MARK QUINN NIEDERAUER; GABRIELE NIEDERA 1305 S CONCORD ST SALT LAKE UT 84104 V & K INVESTMENTS, LLC PO BOX 25512 SALT LAKE UT 84125 CYNTHIA GROW 1300 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104 STEVE R SR MCCOY; STEVE R JR MCCOY (JT)1208 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104 N.P.M.C., INC.20 W CENTURY PARK WY SOUTH SAL UT 84115 CONCORD, LLC 1947 E STAG HILL CIR DRAPER UT 84020 CORP OF PRES BISHOP OF CH OF JC OF LDS 50 E NORTH TEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE UT 84150 MARGARETA B DIAZ 1316 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104 AUSTIN BLACK; TRISTANA YEGGE (JT)1320 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104 LIEM T NGUYEN; TUYET DAO THI LE (JT)963 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104 JUAN GONZALEZ GARCIA; MAYRA PRADO (JT)1308 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104 RONALD BARRETT; RODOLFO G REVELES (JT)1285 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104 LTD SHARED EQUITIES A 1373 E SKYLINE DR BOUNTIFU UT 84010 SALT LAKE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION PO BOX 18894 SALT LAKE UT 84118 FAITH M SAVAGE; JAMES DENZIL SAVAGE (JT)1352 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104 MOSIANA L MAU 1366 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104 UTAH LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY OF SALT LAKE CITY PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE UT 84114 MICHAEL R WEIS; LUCIA R WEIS (JT)12235 S 4000 W RIVERTON UT 84096 SIONE T TONGAMANA; DUSTIN PAUL BISHOP 1207 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104 YONI MENDOZA (JT)1344 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104 AVALISI LAPUAHO; ANA LAPUAHO (JT)1193 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104 ERIC NESS 1345 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104 PERLITA N RAMIREZ; JULIO A RAMIREZ (TC)1361 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104 ANNETTE S JENSEN 1367 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104 JOSE JESUS RIOS 1373 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104 MARIANNE WILLIAMS 1379 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104 GORDON G WATKINS; CLARINDA S WATKINS (JT)1338 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104 RAUL M FIGUEROA; CANDELARIA FIGUEROA (JT)1344 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104 RONALD L JOHNSON; VICKI JO JOHNSON (JT)1350 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104 GHB TR 1356 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104 CIPRIANO OROZCO 1362 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104 VICTORIA RICCARDI RICHARDS; JANETTE RICCARDI (JT)1368 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104 NAGENDRA DEV 1374 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104 EUSEBIO REYES-RODRIGUEZ; IGNACIO REYES-RODRIGUEZ (TC)1353 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104 ROBERT KELLER (JT)1788 E 5600 S HOLLADAY UT 84121 SOUTHLAND CORPORATION PO BOX 711 DALLAS TX 75221 KYLE J HAMMOND; JAMIE B HAMMOND (JT)459 COUNTRY CLUB STANSBURY UT 84074 GERALD D BURT; CHRISTOPHER S BURT (TC)3045 E LOUISE AVE SALT LAKE UT 84109 Current Occupant 1226 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1306 S 1200 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1281 S CONCORD ST Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1301 S 1200 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1172 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1315 S 1200 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1291 S EMERY ST Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1235 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1365 S CONCORD ST Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1372 S 1200 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1177 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1165 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1363 S EMERY ST Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1369 S EMERY ST Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1157 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1353 S UTAHNA DR Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 Current Occupant 1357 S UTAHNA DR Salt Lake Ci UT 84104 PLNPCM2021-00709 1 October 27, 2021 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Staff Report To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Amanda Roman, Principal Planner Amanda.Roman@slcgov.com or 385-386-2765 (Cell) / 801-535-7660 (Voicemail) Date: October 27, 2021 Re: PLNPCM2021-00709 – Zoning Map Amendment Zoning Map Amendment PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1193 W California Avenue PARCEL SIZE: Total of .28 acres (Approx. 12,200 square feet) PARCEL ID: 15-14-104-001-0000 MASTER PLAN: Westside Master Plan (2014) ZONING DISTRICT: R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential REQUEST: Salt Lake City has received a request from Kesaia Young, property owner, requesting that the City amend the zoning map designation for the property at 1193 W California Avenue. The proposal would rezone the property from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential) to R-1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential). The rezone would allow the property to be subdivided into two lots that each meet the minimum lot area for a single-family dwelling. A specific development proposal was not submitted with the Zoning Map Amendment, but if approved, the property owner intends to redevelop the site by replacing the existing single-family home with two new single-family homes, each on their own parcel. The Planning Commission’s role in this application is to provide a recommendation to the City Council, who will make the final decision on the requested zoning map amendment. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information in this staff report, Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment. ATTACHMENTS: A. Current Zoning Map & Future Land Use Map B. Applicant Information C. Site and Vicinity Photos D. Analysis of Amendment Standards E. Public Process and Comments F. Department Comments PLNPCM2021-00709 2 October 27, 2021 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The property owner is requesting to change the zoning map designation of the property at 1193 W California Avenue from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential) to R-1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential) with the intent to subdivide the parcel into two lots to build two new single-family homes and potentially two attached ADUs. The lots would remain under the same ownership and the dwelling units would be occupied by additional family members. A specific site development proposal has not been submitted, but the existing single-family home that was built in 1946 would be replaced. The subject property is approximately 12,200 square feet. The current R-1/7,000 zoning district requires a minimum lot area of 7,000 square feet for a single-family dwelling. Under the existing R-1/7,000 zoning, the subject property does not have the minimum 14,000 square feet to subdivide the property and build two single family dwellings. The proposed request to amend the zoning map from R-1/7,000 to R-1/5,000 would allow for the property to be subdivided into two separate lots that each meet the minimum lot size requirements of 5,000 square feet with the intent of building a single-family dwelling on each parcel. The property is located in the South Salt Lake Subdivision, recorded in 1890. The original lots were narrow and deep, measuring between 4,092 and 4,224 square feet. The residential development pattern largely remains intact, but most of the properties were consolidated to create larger lots and the north-south alleyway between the properties was vacated. The neighborhood consists of single-and two-family homes, institutional uses, as well as some interspersed commercial. The Jordan River Parkway Trail is less than 600 feet to the east and two “Community Nodes”, as identified in the Westside Master Plan, are less than 600 feet to the west, at approximately California Avenue and between 1300 W and Concord Street. The Westside Master Plan is not being changed and the proposed zoning is supported by the neighborhood and housing visions identified in the plan which states, “All new infill development, whether single-, two- or multi-family residential, should adhere to the prevailing development pattern in the immediate area.” The prevailing development pattern in the neighborhood, and on the westside, is single-family residential. The proposed rezone would not change the character of the existing single-family neighborhood but would allow for the subject property to be subdivided, resulting in two lots that could be developed with single-family dwellings. The applicant provided a project narrative explaining the rationale for the zoning map amendment request that can be found in Attachment B of this report. PLNPCM2021-00709 3 October 27, 2021 KEY CONSIDERATIONS The key considerations associated with this proposal are: 1. Compliance with Master Plan Policies 2. Compatibility with Adjacent Properties 3. R-1/5,000 and R-1/7,000 Zoning District Comparison Consideration 1: Compliance with Master Plan Policies Westside Master Plan (2014) Through changes in land use, improved public infrastructure and increased community investment, the Westside Master Plan envisions redevelopment that maintains the character of existing stable neighborhoods, while diversifying commercial centers and growing recreational assets. The plan supports higher density residential growth where appropriate and encourages the reinvestment in and protect of existing low density residential neighborhoods. The master plan anticipates that the overall level of change within single-family neighborhoods will be low, but they are viewed as areas of opportunity for incremental growth and redevelopment. As stated in the master plan, “The established and stable neighborhoods of the Westside will remain the core of the community, retaining traditional development patterns while also providing new housing opportunities.” The Westside Community is comprised of the Glendale and Poplar Grove neighborhoods, both of which have designated neighborhood, community and regional nodes where future growth is to be accommodated. The subject property is located within the Glendale neighborhood and adjacent to a “Community Node” located at California Avenue and Concord Street, where the Glendale City Library and a Baptist and LDS church are located. A “Community Node” is defined as “an intersection consisting of at least one major road where there is potential for changes in land use and the development pattern.” Community nodes support adding residential density in low-density neighborhoods in the form of infill development and appropriately scaled multi-family units and ADUs. Community nodes are also areas where smaller commercial and institutional uses should be established as anchoring businesses within residential areas. The proposed zoning map amendment is compatible with the traditional development pattern of the neighborhood and the increase in allowable density is supported by the property’s location near a community node. Plan Salt Lake (2015) The proposed zoning map amendment adheres to the initiatives within Plan Salt Lake, a citywide plan that outlines the City’s overall vision for sustainable growth and development. This includes the development of a diverse mix of uses and housing options, which are essential to accommodate the growing population in a responsible manner. The compatibility of new development and how it fits into the scale and character of existing neighborhoods is also an important consideration. Applicable growth and housing initiatives that the proposed zoning map amendment would help implement are below. Growth: • Locate new development in areas with existing infrastructure and amenities, such as transit and transportation corridors. • Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land. • Accommodate and promote an increase in the City’s population. • Provide access to opportunities for a healthy lifestyle (including parks, trails, recreation, and healthy food). PLNPCM2021-00709 4 October 27, 2021 Housing: • Encourage housing options that accommodate aging in place. • Direct new growth toward areas with existing infrastructure and services that have the potential to be people-oriented. • Enable moderate density increases within existing neighborhoods where appropriate. • Increase the number of medium density housing types and options. Guiding Principles outlined in Plan Salt Lake that would relate to the proposed change include the following: • Neighborhoods that provide a safe environment, opportunity for social interaction, and services needed for the wellbeing of the community therein. • Growing responsibly while providing people with choices about where they live, how they live, and how they get around. • Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the city, providing the basic human need for safety and responding to changing demographics. The proposed zoning map amendment is aligned with the vision and guiding principles outlined in Plan Salt Lake relating to growth and housing opportunities. Additionally, the subject property is located on a major transit corridor and nearby recreation and outdoor amenities, which can support the increase in density. Consideration 2: Compatibility with Adjacent Properties The subject property is located on the south-east corner of California Avenue and 1200 West. California Avenue is one of the largest east-west roads in the area and is surrounded by primarily residential development. Surrounding uses include churches, public libraries, and the Jordan River Parkway Trail. The residential zoning designation on the south side of California Avenue is R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential. While it is a single-family zoning designation, there are existing duplexes in the neighborhood, including one directly east of the subject property. There are three nearby corners that are designated as Community Nodes and zoned Neighborhood Commercial, which are intended to support small scale commercial development. The properties on the north side of California Avenue are primarily zoned R- 1/5,000 Single-Family Residential with one north-south block face that is zoned R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential. CALIFORNIA AVE 1200 EMERY ST. CONCORD ST. PLNPCM2021-00709 5 October 27, 2021 While the proposed rezone would create the only R-1/5,000 property on the south side of California Avenue, the existing development pattern is more compatible with the R-1/5,000 zoning standards than the R-1/7,000 zoning standards. As discussed above, the recorded South Salt Lake Subdivision plat consisted of narrow lots just over 4,000 square feet in size. The built development pattern differs from the original subdivision as most of the lots have been consolidated and the north-south alleyway was vacated. For comparison, staff reviewed the average lot sizes of the lots between California Avenue and Utahna Drive and between 1200 W and Emery Street. The 1890 South Salt Lake Subdivision plat has 72 lots, which have since been consolidated into 42 total lots. Of the 42 lots, only three, including the subject property, exceed 7,000 square feet. The other 39 lots are approximately 6,500 square feet and therefore, do not meet the current R-1/7,000 zoning standards, even after being consolidated. The change in zoning would reflect the original and current residential development pattern and provide a compatible infill housing opportunity. Consideration 3: R-1/5,000 and R-1/7,000 Zoning District Comparison A comparison of the R-1/5,000 and R-1/7,000 zoning standards is below. In addition to the difference in minimum lot square footage, the R-1/5,000 zone also has reduced rear and side yard building setbacks. The permitted building height, lot width, lot coverage, front yard setback, and parking requirements are the same in both zones. The permitted and conditional land uses are also identical in both zones. Staff does not anticipate any significant impacts to the surrounding property owners or occupants if the rezone is approved and the lot is subsequently subdivided and developed under the R-1/5,000 zoning standards. ZONING STANDARDS MIN. LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT MIN. LOT WIDTH MAX. LOT COVERAGE FRONT YARD REAR YARD CORNER SIDE YARD INTERIOR SIDE YARD R-1/5,000 5,000 SF 28 feet for pitched roofs 20 feet for flat roofs 50 feet 40% Average of front yards for existing buildings on block face. Where none, 20 feet minimum 25% of lot depth or 20 feet, whichever is less Corner: 10 feet Interior: 4 feet on corner lots 4 feet on one side and 10 feet on the other for interior lots R-1/7,000 7,000 SF 28 feet for pitched roofs 20 feet for flat roofs 50 feet 40% Average of front yards for existing buildings on block face. Where none, 20 feet minimum 25 feet Corner: Equal to the average of the existing buildings on the block face. Where none, 20 feet Interior: 6 feet on corner lots 6 feet on one side and 10 feet on the other for interior lots PLNPCM2021-00709 6 October 27, 2021 DISCUSSION The proposed rezone is compatible with the platted subdivision and reflects the existing development pattern, which consists of single- and two-family dwellings on lots less than 7,000 square feet in size. The proposed change would allow for the subdivision of the property but is not expected to change the character of the neighborhood or have adverse impacts on future growth. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map meets the vision of the Westside Master Plan and Plan Salt Lake housing and growth initiatives. Furthermore, rezoning the property to R-1/5,000 meets the intent of the zoning district which is to, “provide for conventional single-family residential neighborhoods on lots not less than five thousand (5,000) square feet in size. This district is appropriate in areas of the City as identified in the applicable community Master Plan. Uses are intended to be compatible with the existing scale and intensity of the neighborhood. The standards for the district are intended to provide for safe and comfortable places to live and play, promote sustainable and compatible development patterns and to preserve the existing character of the neighborhood”. The subject property is also near transit, parks, and other amenities which are intended to support housing in the city. The proposed rezone is compatible with the neighborhood and supports the Westside community’s vision for neighborhood growth as outlined in the Westside Master Plan. NEXT STEPS The Planning Commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration as part of the final decision on this petition. If the zoning map amendment is approved, the applicant may proceed with subdividing and developing the property under the applicable R-1/5,000 zoning standards. PLNPCM2021-00709 7 October 27, 2021 ATTACHMENT A: Current Zoning Map PLNPCM2021-00709 8 October 27, 2021 Future Land Use Map in the Westside Master Plan Subject Property PLNPCM2021-00709 9 October 27, 2021 ATTACHMENT B: Applicant Information PLNPCM2021-00709 10 October 27, 2021 PLNPCM2021-00709 11 October 27, 2021 ATTACHMENT C: Site and Vicinity Photos Subject Property – east façade and driveway 2 on California Ave Subject Property –north façade fronting California Ave Subject Property – west façade and driveway 1 on 1200 West Subject Property – rear facade PLNPCM2021-00709 12 October 27, 2021 North: LDS church East: duplex and 7-11 South: single-family home West: single-family home PLNPCM2021-00709 13 October 27, 2021 ATTACHMENT D: ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS 21A.50.050: A decision to amend the text of this title or the zoning map by general amendment is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the city council and is not controlled by any one standard. In making a decision to amend the zoning map, the City Council should consider the following: Factor Finding Rationale 1. Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents; Complies with Master Plan policy statements and Future Land Use Map The proposed Zoning Map Amendment meets the purpose and vision of the Westside Master Plan and Plan Salt Lake. Based on the existing land uses, development pattern and the adopted master plans, rezoning the parcel to the R-1/5,000 zoning district is appropriate for the following reasons: • The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the future land use map in the Master Plan which identifies this as a neighborhood use near Community Nodes. • The proposed change is in compliance with the future vision for the area. • The proposed zoning map amendment is aligned with the vision and guiding principles contained in Plan Salt Lake. 2. Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies The proposed rezone is from single-family residential to single- family residential. The purpose of residential zoning districts is: “The residential districts are intended to provide a range of housing choices to meet the needs of Salt Lake City’s citizens, to offer a balance of housing types and densities, to preserve and maintain the City’s neighborhoods as safe and convenient places to live, to promote the harmonious development of residential communities, to ensure compatible infill development, and to help implement adopted plans.” Other than the difference in the required minimum lot size, the purpose statement of both the R-1/5,000 and R-1/7,000 Zoning Districts is to provide for single-family neighborhoods with uses that are compatible with the existing scale and intensity of the neighborhood. The proposed rezone from R-1/7,000 to R-1/5,000 would support the purpose statements within the zoning ordinance and is compatible with the existing scale and intensity of the neighborhood. 3. The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent properties; Complies As discussed in Consideration 2, while the surrounding properties are zoned R-1/7,000, the existing development pattern more closely reflects the R-1/5,000 zone. The lots in the platted 1890 subdivision were just over 4,000 SF in size. Since being subdivided, most of the lots have been consolidated with others, but even so, the majority of them are less than the prescribed minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet. If the zone change is approved and the subject property is subdivided into two lots, the two lots would be compatible in size to the existing lots PLNPCM2021-00709 14 October 27, 2021 and could be developed in a similar manner. The zone change would reduce the lot size and setback requirements but would not change the standards related to building height, lot width, lot coverage, or parking. Staff does not anticipate there being adverse impacts related to the change in zone from single-family to single-family. 4. Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards Complies The subject property does not fall within an overlay zoning district. 5. The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection. Complies The petition was reviewed by the necessary city departments and there were no concerns regarding the rezone. The applicant also went to a DRT meeting to discuss subdividing the property if the rezone is approved. The DRT comments are included in Attachment F. The property is located within an established residential development where public facilities, roadways, and services are existing. If the rezone is approved, any future subdivision or development would be required to comply with the applicable R- 1/5,000 standards. PLNPCM2021-00709 15 October 27, 2021 ATTACHMENT E: Public Process and Comments Public Notice, Meetings, Comments The following is a list of public meetings that have been held, and other public input opportunities, related to the proposed project: • Notice of the project and request for comments sent to the Chair of the Glendale Community Council on July 27, 2021. • Staff sent an early notification announcement of the proposal to all residents and property owners located within 300 feet of the subject property on July 28, 2021. • The petition information was posted to the Online Open House webpage to solicit public comments on the proposal. The Online Open House period started on July 30, 2021 and will be open until after the Planning Commission meeting. • The 45-day recognized organization comment period expired on September 10, 2021. The Glendale Community Council did not provide comments. Notice of the public hearing for the proposal included: • Public hearing notice mailed: October 15, 2021 • Public hearing notice signs posted on property: October 15, 2021 • Public notice posted on City & State websites and Planning Division list serves: October 15, 2021 Public Input: No comments in favor or opposition of the petition were submitted by members of the public. If any comments are submitted after the publication of the staff report they will be forwarded to the Planning Commission and included in the public record. PLNPCM2021-00709 16 October 27, 2021 ATTACHMENT F: Department Comments Planning staff routed the proposed rezone to Building, Engineering, Transportation, Public Utilities, Fire, and Sustainability. There were no concerns regarding the rezone from any of the departments. Staff asked the applicant to attend a DRT meeting prior to moving forward with the petition to make sure there were no upfront issues with subdividing the property if the rezone were to be approved. The DRT group did not have any concerns regarding subdividing the property under the R-1/5,000 zoning standards, but a formal review of a preliminary and final plat will be completed if rezone is approved by the City Council. As of October 2021, internal ADUs are permitted uses and would not be reviewed by Planning staff or approved by the Planning Commission. Item B4 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:February 15, 2022 RE: 2060 North 2200 West Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2021-00575 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:February 15, 2022 RE: 2060 North 2200 West Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2021-00575 BRIEFING UPDATE At the February 1 briefing the Council expressed general support for the proposed zoning map amendment. The applicant stated they do not have specific plans for the property other than hoping to consolidate the subject parcel with their parcel that surrounds on three sides. Future use will be determined at a later date. Note: A Council staff report was not prepared for this item. Item Schedule: Briefing: February 1, 2022 Set Date: February 1, 2022 Public Hearing: February 15, 2022 Potential Action: March 1, 2022 ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: Zoning Map Amendment at approximately 2060 North 2200 W, Petition PLNPCM2021-00575 STAFF CONTACT: Krissy Gilmore, Principal Planner, Kristina.Gilmore@slcgov.com, 385- 535-7780 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission to change the zoning map to M-1 (Light Manufacturing) from the current designation of AG-2 (Agricultural) for one parcel. BUDGET IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Chad Salmon, property owner, has submitted a zoning map amendment to amend the existing zoning of AG-2 (Agricultural District) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing). The subject property is located at 2060 North 2200 West and is surrounded by M-1 zoning. The amendment is to implement the master plan zoning and to accommodate future commercial land uses. No specific site development proposal has been submitted at this time. For specific information regarding the proposal, please refer to the Planning Commission Staff Report. One parcel is part of this request and contains a single-family dwelling and related agricultural accessory structures. The property is located within the boundaries of the Inland Port (IP) Overlay District. The IP Overlay permits uses not currently allowed in the AG-2 zoning by allowing all M- 1 uses through the City’s conditional use process. The change in zoning designation only impacts the approval process that must be followed for a proposed use and has negligible impact on what could ultimately be developed on the property. January 14, 2021 Lisa Shaffer (Jan 14, 2022 11:16 MST) 01/14/2022 01/14/2022 PUBLIC PROCESS: • Information about this petition and a request for comments was sent to the Chair of the Westpointe Community Council on June 23, 2021. • Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing notice about the proposal and information on how to give public input on the project on June 23, 2021. • The Westpointe Community Council requested attendance from city staff at a community event on August 3, 2021. Staff attended the event and did not receive any comments regarding the proposal at that time. • At the Public Hearing of August 25, 2021, written comments were submitted via email from the Chair of the Westpointe CC for the Planning Commission’s consideration. Those comments were not reflected in the staff report. A copy of the submitted letter is included in Attachment 4 of this transmittal - Written Comments Submitted to Planning Commission. Planning Commission (PC) Records PC Agenda for August 25, 2021 (Click to Access) PC Minutes of August 25, 2021 (Click to Access) PC Staff Report for August 25, 2021 (Click to Access Staff Report) EXHIBITS 1. Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Hearing 3. Petition Application 4. Written Comments Submitted to Planning Commission 2200 W 2100 N SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2022 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to one parcel of property located at 2060 North 2200 West Street to rezone the property from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to one parcel of property located at 2060 North 2200 West Street to rezone the property from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00575. WHEREAS, Chad Salmon submitted an application on behalf of the property owner, Salmon Investments, LLC, to rezone property located at 2060 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No. 08-21-226-001-0000) from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00575; and WHEREAS, at its August 25, 2021 meeting, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said application; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the parcel located at 2060 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No. 08-21-226-001-0000), and as more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, shall be and hereby is rezoned from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2022. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2022. Published: ______________. APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney December 17, 2021 Exhibit “A” Legal Descriptions of the four to be rezoned to M-1 Light Manufacturing District Parcel located at 2060 North 2200 West Street: Parcel No. 08-21-226-001-0000 0106 COM 1309 FT W & 153 FT S FR NE COR SEC 21 T 1N R 1W SL MER S 140 FT E 200 FT N 140 FT W 200 FT TO BEG 0.64 AC 6150-2588 7490-2237 9980-8541 1) CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2021-00575 June 3, 2021 Salmon Investments, LLC submitted an application for a Zoning Map Amendment. June 15, 2021 Petition PLNPCM2021-00575 was assigned to Krissy Gilmore, Senior Planner, for staff analysis and processing. June 23, 2021 Notice sent to Recognized Community Organizations informing them of the petition. Early notification of the project was also sent to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the proposal. August 3, 2021 The proposal was presented at the Westpointe Night Out community event. Planning staff was in attendance to answer questions about the proposal. August 11, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing notices emailed to interested parties and residents/property owners who requested notice. Agenda posted to the Planning Commission website and the State of Utah Public Notice webpage. August 19, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report posted. August 25, 2021 Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a positive recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed text amendment. 2) NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2021-00535 – Chad Salmon, property owner, has submitted a zoning map amendment to amend the existing AG-2 (Agricultural District) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing). The amendment is to implement the master plan zoning and to accommodate future commercial land uses. The subject property is located at 2060 North 2200 West. No specific site development proposal has been submitted at this time. Information on this proposal can be found in the staff report prepared for the Planning Commission accessible from this link - http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/08.August/00575.2200WRezo ne.StaffReport.pdf As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held electronically: DATE: Date #1 and Date #2 TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: **This meeting will not have a physical location. **This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation. If you are interested in participating in the Public Hearing, please visit our website at https://www.slc.gov/council/ to learn how you can share your comments during the meeting. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Krissy Gilmore at 385-535-7780 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at Kristina.gilmore@slcgov.com. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 3) PETITION APPLICATION 4) WRITTEN COMMENTS SUBMITTED TO PLANNING COMMISSION From: To:Planning Public Comments Cc:Rebollo, Joshua; Amy@treeutah.org; DennisFaris@gmail.com; Rogers, James; Norris, Nick; Gilmore, Kristina Subject:(EXTERNAL) Comments for Aug 25 Planning Commission mtg regarding PLNPCM2021-00575 (agenda item #5) Date:Tuesday, August 24, 2021 12:24:49 PM Importance:High Salt Lake City under Mayor Mendenhall has been very active in promoting the planting of trees on the westside in order to mitigate air pollution and improve the area. Additionally Ivory Homes has augmenting the City’s efforts with their own 30,000 tree planting initiative. It is therefore more than frustrating that the Planning Commission is now considering a re-zoning request which would unnecessarily destroy a mature tree canopy on 2200 West. (See attached photos). Therefore, members of the local Community Council, are submitting an objection to the AG-2 to M-1 rezoning at 2060 N. 2200 West. Consideration of such rezoning should be delayed until the updated North Point Master Plan is completed. Such planning will allow the City, in concert with residents, professional planners, and other stakeholders to determine whether it is in the City’s best interest to allow the numerous mature trees located on this parcel to be cut-down as part of an effort to construct a Maverick gas station on the site. The summary in the Aug 25th planning commission agenda (item #5) states the purpose of the change is “to implement the master plan zoning…” This is not just misleading but incorrect. The 2060 N 2200 West property lies within the Northpoint Small Area Master Plan whose stated goal is to “eliminate potential land use conflicts with the Salt Lake International Airport while preserving and enhancing the existing agricultural lifestyle.” This master plan, adopted in 2000, does NOT contain any M-1 zoning. Instead, the plan’s zoning map consists of parcels zoned BP (Business Park ), AG-2 and AG-5. Whether area properties should include M-1 zoning is one of the reasons both developers and residents agree on the need to update the Northpoint Small Area Master Plan. The community’s experience with Ivory Development in developing a BP zoning overlay for the area illustrated the need and ability to update the master plan with strategies that resolve existing problems. Not long afterward (Jan 2019) , the City Council agreed to fund such an update. Currently Salt Lake City has entered a $100,000 contract with Logan Simpson to update this master plan. Members of the consulting team have already attended community council meetings, manned booths at community events, and started discussions with a diverse steering committee of area stakeholders. This planning process needs to be supported rather than undermined. Such efforts should not be “undercut” by adopting premature re-zoning proposals. It is ironic that the Northpoint Small Area Master Plan came about as a result of circumstances similar to what we face today. According to the Plan’s historical Introduction when Salt Lake City took steps to rezone Northpoint for development residents pushed back. The City Council responded in 1999 by adopting “a six-month moratorium to allow the creation of a small area plan for Northpoint.” More than twenty years later, the residents of this unique area again ask the City to adopt a moratorium to ensure the update master planning process is successfully implemented. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Dorothy P. Owen, chair Westpointe Community Council PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Staff Report To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Krissy Gilmore, Principal Planner, (385) 214-9714 or Kristina.gilmore@slcgov.com Date: August 25, 2021 Re: PLNPCM2021-00575 2200 West Zoning Map Amendment Zoning Map Amendment PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2060 North 2200 West PARCEL ID: 08-21-226-001-0000 MASTER PLAN: North Point Small Area Plan ZONING DISTRICT: AG-2 (Agricultural District) REQUEST: Chad Salmon, property owner, has submitted a zoning map amendment to amend the existing AG-2 (Agricultural District) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing). The amendment is to implement the master plan zoning and to accommodate future commercial land uses. The subject property is located at 2060 North 2200 West. No specific site development proposal has been submitted at this time. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the findings in the staff report, Planning Staff recommends that the zoning of the subject property located at 2060 N. 2200 W. be amended from AG-2 (Agricultural District) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zoning district. Based on the information in this staff report and the factors to consider for zoning map amendments, Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to the City Council regarding this proposal. ATTACHMENTS: A. Vicinity Map a. Northpoint Small Area Plan Future Land Use Map B. Additional Applicant Information C. AG-2 and M-1 Allowed Uses Comparison D. Existing Conditions E. Photos of Subject Property F. Analysis of Standards G. Public Process and Comments H. City Department Comments PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request by a private land owner to amend the existing AG-2 (Agricultural District) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zoning district. The property owner is seeking to amend the subject property to implement the future land use designations noted in the applicable master plan and to increase the economic viability of the subject property. M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zoning district aligns with the future anticipated use of the subject property. Additionally, the properties located to the south along 2200 West were rezoned from BP (Business Park) zoning district to M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zoning district in 2017. The horseshoe property surrounding the subject parcel was rezoned from AG-2 to M-1 with final approval from the City Council in May 2021 (PLNPCM2018-00657). Agricultural District (AG-2) VS. Light Industrial (M-1) Zoning The following are the purpose statements of the AG-2 (existing zoning) and M-1 (proposed zoning) districts: The purpose of the AG-2 Agricultural District is to preserve and protect agricultural uses in suitable portions of Salt Lake City on lots not less than two (2) acres. These regulations are also designed to minimized conflicts between agricultural and nonagricultural uses. This district is appropriate in areas of the City where the applicable Master Plans support this type of land use. The purpose of the M-1 Light Manufacturing District is to provide an environment for light industrial uses that produce no appreciable impact on adjacent properties, that desire a clean attractive industrial setting, and that protects nearby sensitive lands and waterways. This zone is appropriate in locations that are supported by the applicable Master Plan policies adopted by the City. This district is intended to provide areas in the City that generate employment opportunities and to promote economic development. The uses include other types of land uses that support and provide service to manufacturing and industrial uses. Safe, convenient and inviting connections that provide access to businesses from public sidewalks, bike paths and streets are necessary and to be provided in an equal way. Certain land uses are prohibited in order to preserve land for manufacturing uses and to promote the importance of nearby environmentally sensitive lands. The purpose of the amendment is to facilitate future commercial land uses along the 2200 West corridor and to provide a contiguous district along 2200 West. The remaining AG-2 (Agricultural District) will be appropriately buffered with the adopted amendments that were incorporated into the M-1 Zoning District regulations. KEY ISSUES: The key issues listed below have been identified through the analysis of the project, neighbor and community input and department review comments. 1. Mater Plan Recommendations 2. Inland Port Overlay Issue 1: Master Plan Recommendations The Northpoint Small Area Plan was adopted in 2000 and includes the subject property. The plan shows the future land use of this area as Business Park which was consistent with the zoning put in place during the Citywide zoning amendment project in 1995. While the Northpoint Small Area Plan identifies the area as a Business Park, it also states that the Business Park zone should be amended to allow retail and service type businesses that would support the employee base in the area. The Business Park zoning district allows retail and restaurant uses only if they are approved as part of an overall business park planned development. They are not allowed as single uses on a property, which limits the feasibility of these uses occurring in the area. In addition to the Business Park land use designation, the Northpoint Small Area Plan also states that future business park development should be buffered from the existing agricultural properties. The buffer includes a 100 foot building setback, a 50 foot parking lot setback, and landscaping with a five foot tall berm. Although the proposed Light Manufacturing zoning district is not strictly consistent with the future land use designation as stated in the Northpoint Small Area Plan, it is Staff’s opinion that the zoning amendment is consistent with the intent of the plan for the following reasons: 1. The plan highlights the need for retail and service uses to serve the future employee s of the area. The Light Manufacturing district allows single-tenant retail and service uses, which would serve the employees of the area. 2. The uses allowed in the Light Manufacturing District are required to be environmentally clean, light industrial. Heavy manufacturing is not allowed in the Light Manufacturing zoning district. Of note, the Northpoint Small Area Plan is in the beginning stages of a rewrite and update. That said, a privately initiated petition must still be processed regardless of the update process. The request is subject to review comparing the existing Northpoint Small Area Plan. In addition to the Northpoint Small Area Plan, the proposal is also supported by Plan Salt Lake’s Economy Principal and Initiatives. The plan discusses initiatives to support the growth of industrial areas of the City (Initiative 9), as well as recruiting headquarters and large scale businesses. Issue 2: Inland Port Overlay The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Inland Port Overlay District (IP Overlay). The IP Overlay was adopted in December 2018. One impact of the IP Overlay is that it allows for all properties in the IP Overlay to follow the uses allowed in the M-1 Light Manufacturing Zoning District regardless of their underlying or base zoning designation. Where uses are allowed in the M-1 district but not allowed in the underlying base zone, the use is allowed through the Conditional Use process. As such, the full range of uses allowed in the M-1 district would already be allowed on the AG-2 zoned subject properties via the IP Overlay rules but some uses would have to go through the Conditional Use process since they are not allowed under the AG-2 base zoning designation. The change in zoning designation therefore has negligible impact on what could eventually be developed on the property and only impacts the approval process that must be followed for approval depending upon the proposed use. DISCUSSION: The proposal complies with the standards for zoning map amendments, see Attachment D. After analyzing the proposal and the applicable standards, Planning Staff is of the opinion that a positive recommendation should be forwarded to the City Council for this request. NEXT STEPS: The City Council has the final authority to make changes to the zoning map. The recommendation of the Planning commission for this request will be forwarded to the City Council for their review and decision. ATTACHMENT A: VICINITY MAP Note: The AG-2 property surrounding the subject property was rezoned to M-1 in May 2021. The City’s GIS layer has not been updated as of publishing of this report. Neighboring parcel rezoned to M-1 Subject Property Subject Property Northpoint Small Area Plan Future Land Use Map Subject Property ATTACHMENT B: ADDITIONAL APPLICANT INFORMATION ATTACHMENT C: AG-2 AND M-1 ALLOWED USES COMPARISON PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES – AG-2 & M-1 DISTRICTS COMBINED LIST Uses AG-2 M-1 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P P Adaptive reuse of a landmark site C Agricultural use P P Alcohol: Bar establishment C6,10 Brewpub P6,10 Distillery P Tavern C6,10 Winery P Ambulance services (indoor and/or outdoor) P Animal: Cremation service P Kennel P8 P13 Pet cemetery P4 P2 Pound P12,13 Raising of furbearing animals C Stockyard C12 Stable (private) P Stable (Public) P Veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height P C Artisan food production P Bakery, commercial P Blacksmith shop P Bottling plant P Brewery P Building materials distribution P Bus line station/terminal P Bus line yard and repair facility P12 Check cashing/payday loan business P9 Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation P Community correctional facility, large C8,16 Community correctional facility, small C8,16 Community garden P P Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing C12,13 Contractor’s yard/office P Crematorium P Daycare, nonregistered home daycare P22 P Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P22 P Daycare center, adult P Daycare center, child P Drop forge industry Dwelling, living quarters for caretaker or security guard, limited to uses on lots 1 acre in size or larger and is accessory to principal use allowed by the zoning district P Dwelling: Assisted living facility (large) Assisted living facility (limited capacity) Assisted living facility (small) Group home (large) Group home (small) P Living quarters for caretaker or security guard Manufactured home P Mobile home Multi-family Residential support (large) Residential support (small) Rooming (boarding) house Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) P Twin home and two-family Eleemosynary facilities Exhibition hall Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) P Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) P Explosive manufacturing and storage Farm stand, seasonal P Financial institution with or without drive-through facility P11 Flammable liquids or gases, heating fuel distribution and storage Food processing P Gas station P Government facility P Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P Grain elevator P12 Greenhouse P Heavy manufacturing P15 Home occupation P Hotel/motel P Impound lot P12 Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly P Laboratory (medical, dental, optical) P Laboratory, testing P Large wind energy system C P13,14 Laundry, commercial P Light manufacturing P Limousine service P Mobile food business (operation in the public right- of-way) P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space P P Package delivery facility P Paint manufacturing Parking: Commercial P Off site P Park and ride lot P Park and ride lot shared with existing use P Photo finishing lab P Poultry farm or processing plant Printing plant P Radio television station P Railroad, freight terminal facility C4 Railroad, repair shop P Recreation (indoor) P Recreation (outdoor) P Recycling: Collection station P Processing center (indoor) P Processing center (outdoor) C12,13,14 Refinery, petroleum products Restaurant with or without drive-through facilities P Retail goods establishment with or without drive- through facility P Retail service establishment: Electronic repair shop P Furniture repair shop P Upholstery shop P Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution C School: Profession and vocational (with outdoor activities) P Professional and vocational (without outdoor activities) P Seminary and religious institute P Seasonal farm stand P Sexually oriented business P5 Sign painting/fabrication P Slaughterhouse Small brewery P Solar array P Storage and display (outdoor) P Storage, public (outdoor) P Store, convenience P Studio, motion picture P Taxicab facility P Tire distribution retail/wholesale P Truck freight terminal P12 Urban farm P P Utility: Building or structure P1 P Electric generation facility C3,12 Sewage treatment plant C Solid waste transfer station C12 Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P1 P1 Vehicle: Auction P Automobile and truck repair P Automobile and truck sales and rental (including large truck) P Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) P Automobile salvage recycling (outdoor) C12,13,14 Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service P Truck repair (large) P Vending cart, private property P Warehouse P Welding shop P P Wholesale distribution P P Wireless telecommunications facility Woodworking mill P QUALIFYING PROVISIONS (COMBINED FROM AG-2 AND M-1) 1. See subjection 21A.02.050B of this title for utility regulations. 2. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval. 3. Electric generating facilities shall be located within 2,640 feet of an existing 138kV or larger electric power transmission line. 4. No railroad freight terminal facility shall be located within 1 mile of a residential zoning district. 5. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in section 21A.36.140 of this title. 6. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the place worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 7. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building’s footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the building’s footprint or new office building construction are subject to a conditional building and site design review. 8. A community correctional facility is considered an institutional use and any such facility located within an airport noise overlay zone is subject to the land use and sound attenuation standards for institutional uses of the applicable airport overlay zone within chapter 21A.34 of this title. 9. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than ½ mile of other check cashing/payday loan businesses. 10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in section 21A.36.300 “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 11. Subject to conformance to the provisions in section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive-through use regulations. 12. Prohibited within 1,000feet of a single- or two-family zoning district. 13. Prohibited within the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area of the Northwest Quadrant Overlay District. 14. Prohibited within the Development Area of the Northwest Quadrant Overlay District. 15. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to section 21A.36.030 of this title. 16. Prohibited within ½ mile of any residential zoning district boundary and subject to section 21A.36.110 of this title. 17. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of cultural Resources. 18. When located on an arterial street. 19. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval. 20. In conjunction with, and within the boundaries of, a cemetery for human remains. 21. Radio station equipment and antennas shall be required to go through the site plan review process to ensure that the color, design and location of all proposed equipment and antennas are screened or integrated into the architecture of the project and are compatible with surrounding uses. 22. When approved as part of a business park planned development pursuant to the provisions of chapter 21A.55 of this title. 23. Kennels, whether within penned enclosures or within enclosed buildings, shall not be permitted within 200 feet of an existing single-family dwelling on an adjacent lot. 24. Trails and trailheads without parking lots and without directional and informational signage specific to trail usage shall be permitted. 25. Greater than 3 ambulances at location require a conditional use. 26. Maximum of 1 monopole per property and only when it is government owned and operated for public safety purposes. 27. If located on a collector or arterial street according to the Salt Lake City Transportation Master Plan – major street plan: roadway functional classification map. 28. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district. 29. Occupancy shall be limited to 25 persons. 30. No large group home shall be located within 800 feet of another group home. 31. No small group home shall be located within 800 feet of another group home. 32. No large residential support shall be located within 800 feet of another residential support. 33. No small residential support shall be located within 800 feet of another residential support. 34. No eleemosynary facility shall be located within 800 feet of another eleemosynary, group home or residential support. 35. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to section 21A.36.130 of this title. 36. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to section 21A.36.030 of this title. 37. Must contain retail component for on-site foot sales. 38. Prior to issuance of a building permit in the Development Area and the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area of the Northwest Quadrant Overlay, consultation with the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources is required to obtain recommendations on siting and equipment types for all solar arrays on a particular property to mitigate impacts to wildlife. ATTACHMENT D: EXISTING CONDITIONS Uses in the Immediate Vicinity of the Property Surrounding the property and to the east of the subject property is zoned M-1. To the south of the subject property, except for 1998, 2004 and 1980 North 2200 West, all of the properties are zoned M-1 (Light Manufacturing). The properties noted above are zoned AG-2 (Agricultural District). AG-2 Agricultural District: The purpose of the AG-2 Agricultural District is to preserve and protect agricultural uses in suitable portions of Salt Lake City on lots not less than two (2) acres. These regulations are also designed to minimize conflicts between agricultural and nonagricultural uses. This district is appropriate in areas of the City where the applicable Master Plans support this type of land use. AG-2 Agricultural District Development Standards (21A.32.052) Maximum Building Height Front Yard Corner Side Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Lot Coverage Landscape Yards Buildable Area for Principal Dwelling Restrictions on Agricultural Uses Single- Family Dwellings: Thirty feet (30’) Thirty feet (30’) Thirty feet (30’) None Thirty five feet (35’) The surface coverage of the principal dwelling shall not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the buildable area for residential uses of the lot. All front and corner side yards shall be maintained as landscape yards in conformance with the requirements of chapter 21A.48 of this title. A residential structure shall not be located farther than two hundred feet (200’) from the front property line. In addition to the applicable foregoing regulations, agricultural uses shall comply with the following requirements: No feeding, grazing, or sheltering of livestock and poultry, whether within penned enclosures or within enclosed buildings, shall be permitted within fifty feet (50’) of an existing single-family dwelling on an adjacent lot. Small Group Homes: Thirty feet (30’) Thirty feet (30’) Thirty feet (30’) None Thirty five feet (35’) The surface coverage of the principal dwelling shall not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the buildable area for residential uses of the lot. All front and corner side yards shall be maintained as landscape yards in conformance with the requirements of chapter 21A.48 of this title. A residential structure shall not be located farther than two hundred feet (200’) from the front property line. Agricultural Uses: Forty five feet (45’) Thirty feet (30’) Thirty feet (30’) None Thirty five feet (35’) The surface coverage of the principal dwelling shall not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the buildable area for residential uses of the lot. All front and corner side yards shall be maintained as landscape yards in conformance with the requirements of chapter 21A.48 of this title. A residential structure shall not be located farther than two hundred feet (200’) from the front property line. Conditional Uses: Forty five feet (45’) Thirty feet (30’) Thirty feet (30’) None Thirty five feet (35’) The surface coverage of the principal dwelling shall not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the buildable All front and corner side yards shall be maintained as landscape yards in conformance with the requirements of chapter A residential structure shall not be located farther than two hundred feet (200’) from the front area for residential uses of the lot. 21A.48 of this title. property line. M-1 Light Manufacturing District: The purpose of the M-1 Light Manufacturing District is to provide an environment for light industrial uses that produce no appreciable impact on adjacent properties, that desire a clean attractive industrial setting, and that protects nearby sensitive lands and waterways. This zone is appropriate in locations that are supported by the applicable Master Plan policies adopted by the City. This district is intended to provide areas in the City that generate employment opportunities and to promote economic development. The uses include other types of land uses that support and provide service to manufacturing and industrial uses. Safe, convenient and inviting connections that provide access to businesses from public sidewalks, bike paths and streets are necessary and to be provided in an equal way. Certain land uses are prohibited in order to preserve land for manufacturing uses and to promote the importance of nearby environmentally sensitive lands. M-1 Light Manufacturing District Development Standards (21A.28.020) Minimum Lot Size Front Yard Corner Side Yard Interior Side Yard Rear Yard Additional Setback Landscape Yards Maximum Height Minimum Lot Area: ten thousand (10,000) square feet. Minimum Lot Width: Eighty feet (80’). Existing Lots: Lots legally existing as of April 12, 1995, shall be considered legal conforming lots. Fifteen feet (15’) Fifteen feet (15’) None Required. None Required. When adjacent to a lot in the AG-2 or AG-5 Zoning District, buildings or portions of buildings, shall be set back one foot (1’) beyond the required landscape buffer as required in section 21A.48.080 of this title for every one foot (1’) of building height above Front and Corner Side Yards: All required front and corner side yards shall be maintained as landscape yards in conformance with the requirements of chapter 21A.48 of this title. Buffer Yards: All lots abutting a lot in a residential district shall conform to the buffer yard requirements Distillation Column Structures; Development in AFPP Overlay District: No building shall exceed sixty five feet (65’) except that emission free distillation column structures, necessary for manufacture processing purposes, shall be permitted up to the most restrictive Federal Aviation Administration imposed minimal approach surface elevations, or one hundred twenty feet (120’) thirty feet (30’) of chapter 21A.48 of this title. Northwest Quadrant Overlay District: Properties located within the Northwest Quadrant Overlay District are subject to special landscape requirements as outlined in subsection 21A.34.140B2 of this title. maximum, whichever is less. Said approach surface elevation will be determined by the Salt Lake City Department of Airports at the proposed locations of the distillation column structure. Any proposed development in the Airport Flight Path Protection (AFPP) Overlay District, as outlined in section 21A.34.040 of this title, will require approval of the Department of Airports prior to issuance of a building permit. All proposed development within the AFPP Overlay District which exceeds fifty feet (50’) may also require site specific approval from the Federal Aviation Administration. Location Exception: In the M-1 Zoning Districts located west of the Sale City International Airport and north of Interstate 80 (I-80), buildings may exceed sixty five feet (65’) in height subject to the conditional building and site design review standards and procedures of chapter 21A.59 of this title. In no case shall any building exceed eighty five feet (85’). Railroad Offloading Structures: Cranes, lifts, and other similar offloading structures related to the operation of a railroad terminal are allowed up to eighty five feet (85’) in height and are also subject to the Airport Flight Path Protection (AFPP) Overlay District and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements. ATTACHMENT E: PHOTOS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Photo of Subject Property Looking East Photo of Subject Property Looking East Photo of 2200 West Looking South Photo of Adjacent Property Looking West Photo of 2200 West Looking North ATTACHMENT F: ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS 21A.50.050: A decision to amend the text of this title or the zoning map by general amendment is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the city council and is not controlled by any one standard. In making a decision to amend the zoning map, the City Council should consider the following: Factor Finding Rationale 1. Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents; Complies As stated in the Key Issues section of this report, changing the zoning of the subject property to M-1 is consistent with the Northpoint Small Area Master Plan and Plan Salt Lake. Staff is of the opinion that the proposal is consistent with the intent of this master plan. The regulations of the M-1 zoning district were amended in 2017. 2. Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies Section 21A.02.030 of the Salt Lake city Code provides the Purpose and Intent of the Zoning Ordinance and states: “The purpose of this title is to promote the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of a present and future inhabitants of Salt Lake City, to implement the adopted plans of the city, and to carry out the purposes of the municipal land use development and management act, title 10, chapter 9, of the Utah Code Annotated or its successor, and other relevant statutes.” The purpose and intent statement then provides eight additional points describing the intent of the zoning code, two of which are applicable to the rezone proposal: • Protect the tax base • Foster the city’s industrial, business and residential development. The purpose of amending the zoning of the subject property is to maximize the development potential by allowing more land uses than allowed in the current zone and expanding the development area of the lots. This is consistent with the overall purpose of the Zoning Ordinance in that it promotes the “prosperity” of the “future inhabitants of Salt Lake City.” It is also consistent with the purpose and intent points stated above. 3. The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent properties; Complies The surrounding property was rezoned to M-1 in 2021, therefore, the affect is considered to be minimal since the proposal is for the same zone. Since the property is located within the boundaries of the Inland Port Overlay, the full range of uses allowed in the M-1 zoning district are allowed on the property under the current AG-2 zoning designation although they must follow the Conditional Use process if the use is not allowed in the underlying AG-2 zone. The change in zoning designation therefore only impacts the approval process that must be followed depending on the proposed use and has negligible impact on what could be developed on the subject property. Staff finds the proposed map amendment to M-1 will have a negligible impact on surrounding properties given that M-1 uses are allowed on the property due to the Inland Port Overlay. 4. Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards Complies The project area is partially located in the Airport Flight Path Protection Zone A and B. These overlay districts provides special regulations that pertain to building height and land use. In the event that there is a conflict on a particular property, the regulations in the overlay district would prevail. 5. The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, storm water drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection. Complies The proposal was reviewed by other city division and no concerns were raised regarding ability to service the subject property under the M-1 development capacity. All requests for a new use would be reviewed to ensure compliance with City codes and policies. ATTACHMENT G: PUBLIC PROCESS AND COMMENTS A letter was mailed to residents and property owners within 300 of the subject property on June 23, 2021. The letter provided early notification of the proposed zoning map amendment. Additionally, early notification was emailed the Westpointe Community Council on June 23, 2021. The early engagement period expired on August 9th. The Westpointe Community Council requested attendance from city staff at a community event on August 3, 2021. Staff attended the event and did not receive any comments regarding the proposal. As of publishing of this report, staff has not received a letter indicating a position from the Westpointe Community Council. Notice of the public hearing for the proposal included: • Public hearing notice mailed on: August 12, 2021 • Public hearing notice sign posted on property: August 12, 2021 • Public notice posted on City and State websites and Pl anning Division list serve: August 12, 2021 ATTACHMENT I: DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS The proposed zoning amendment was sent to the following City Departments/Divisions for review: • Building Services; • Engineering; • Public Utilities; • Transportation; • and Sustainability. There were no objections raised by any of the City Departments. Additionally, notice was mailed to UDOT. Item C1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards Budget Analysts DATE:February 15, 2022 UPDATED 6:36 PM RE: Budget Amendment Number Four FY22 MOTION 1 – PARTIALLY ADOPT I move that the Council adopt an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2021-22 final budget of Salt Lake City only for the item as shown on the motion sheet. Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the individual items below; they are listed for reference. The Council adopted other items at the November 16 and December 14 formal meetings. The Budget Amendment is still open, and the remaining items are held for more information and discussions. Item Being Adopted -E-2: Emergency Winter Overflow Shelter Lease Payment Support ($301,456 from ARPA) o Note that the remaining $298,544 remains available for future Council action MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget TO:City Council Members FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Ben Luedtke, Sylvia Richards, Allison Rowland, and Kira Luke Budget and Policy Analysts DATE:February 15, 2022 RE: Budget Amendment Number Four FY2022 ________________________________________________________________________________ NEW INFORMATION The Council voted on most items in this budget amendment on November 16 and December 14. For item E-2: Emergency Winter Overflow Shelter Support, the Council took a unanimous straw poll (with Council Member Mano absent) that the remaining $600,000 from ARPA will be considered for community activities and potentially business assistance in the area around the temporary overflow shelter pending further discussions. The Administration provided Attachment 6 which provides a budget breakdown and gap analysis for funding the overflow shelter through April 15, 2022. The breakdown shows funding is split between the State (33%), County (50%) and City (17%). However, the total available funding is $602,912 less than total estimated expenses ($2,383,381 funding subtracting $2,986,293 expenses). At the time of publishing this staff report, the State Homelessness Council was scheduled to discuss possible funding to Shelter the Homeless to cover half of the $602,912 funding gap. The Administration recommends that if State funding is secured, then the City provide matching funds to cover the other half of the funding gap. In this scenario, the State and City would each provide $300,000 from ARPA funding. The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration: -To what extent voluntary overtime shifts are being filled for law enforcement at and around the shelter (hoped to be covered by multiple jurisdictions), -Potential funding for community activities and business assistance, -If the proposed uses have been confirmed as ARPA eligible activities under the U.S. Treasury’s final guidance, and -Whether additional resources may be needed at and around the overflow shelter, including after the scheduled closing date of April 15.  Information below was provided to the Council at earlier briefings  At the December 7 briefing, the Council discussed remaining items which were not appropriated at the November 16 formal meeting. Council staff drafted an adoption motion sheet (Attachment 4) based on the Council’s discussion for the December 14 formal meeting. The Council may wish to review the draft motion sheet at the follow up briefing so any requested changes can be made before a vote later that day. Project Timeline: Set Date: Nov. 9, 2021 1st Briefing: Nov. 9, 2021 2nd Briefing: Nov. 16, 2021 Public Hearing & Partial Adoption: Nov. 16, 2021 3rd Briefing: December 7, 2021 4th Briefing: December 14, 2021 Partial Adoption: December 14, 2021 5th Briefing & Partial Adoption: February 15, 2022 Page | 2 The Council identified three items to be held until next calendar year for more information and discussions. The items are: - A-8: Sorenson Impact Center Social Investment Study – Phase 2 Funding – ($150,000 from General Fund Balance) - D-1: Economic Development Loan Fund Move Housing ($100,000 – Housing and $100,000 – General Fund) - E-10: Nonprofit and Business Assistance Community Grants ($4 million from ARPA going to a New Account in the Grant Fund) Straw Poll Request The Administration is requesting the Council take a straw poll to prevent the City returning to the Federal Government unused CARES Act funding. The Finance Department is confirming the unused amounts with external entities that received CARES Act funding from the City. At the time of publishing this staff report, the Department estimates approximately $47,000 for the Downtown Alliance’s Ambassador program is at risk. The straw poll would be: does the Council support using remaining CARES Act funds for Fire Department personnel expenses which are presumptively eligible expenses under U.S. Treasury Department guidance? It’s worth noting that the Council used this approach in Budget Amendment #4 of FY 2021 for the third round of CARES Act funding because at the time the City did not know an exact amount to be received and needed to appropriate the funds by fast approaching deadline. The Council could request that the Administration send a written report when the final amounts are confirmed for unused CARES Act funds and from which uses. Responses to Council Follow-up Questions The Administration provided the below responses to the Council’s follow up questions and policy questions listed in prior versions of this staff report. Some responses were pending at the time of publishing this staff report and the Council may wish to ask the Administration for status updates at the briefing. A-12: Public Lands Park Ranger Pilot Program See Attachment 5 for park ranger sergeant job description. A park ranger description was pending at the time of publishing this staff report. Effectiveness of Civilian Rangers Addressing Criminal Issues in Parks – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration the limits of civilian park rangers addressing criminal issues in parks and when rangers would need to rely on a police officer response. The Administration states the rangers may serve as law enforcement officers but would not be POST-certified like police officers. The Council may also wish to ask the Administration how park rangers would coordinate with the Police Department’s parks bike squad. The Administration has provided the following additional information Park rangers will not be sworn, certified peace officers. They will be civilians, similar to Compliance Officers. If there is a desire to allow Park Rangers to write civil citations for items such as off-leash dog and parking violations, there will likely be some ordinance code changes necessary. As this is a pilot program, we do not intent to implement a citation component until after the program has been in practice for six months to one year. A collaborative partnership between Park Rangers and the Police Department’s bike squad will take a great deal of cooperation to enhance the safety and security of our parks. The Park Ranger program is intended to extend their efforts, by seeking voluntary compliance through education of park codes and rules. Park rangers are an extra set of eyes in the parks who can share observations and monitor trends. Police can communicate with the rangers about possible threats and give them photos of wanted individuals to look for. Page | 3 Communication and cooperation between both groups is crucial. Our hope is that the rangers can relieve the PD of some of their service calls. The key will be to develop relationships between the rangers and the park squad so that they help each other when needed. Once the public understands that SLCPD will respond quickly to ranger calls, the rangers will hold more authority in the parks and can make a significant impact on the safety and security of park visitors. Private Security Guards in Parks – The Public Lands Department currently hires private security guards to lock restrooms in parks and provide security patrols. The Council may wish to ask the Administration for the pros and cons of creating a park ranger program instead of continuing the current practice of hiring private security guards. The Administration has provided the following additional information Park rangers would be more welcoming than security guards. An inhouse program can allow for more training and accountability. People experiencing homelessness are often victims of crimes themselves and security guards are not trained to be first responders to calls for service, provide medical care or to help connect people to services. Rangers will work closely with the Police Department; they’ll know the ins and outs of our parks and have good relationships with neighbors. The intent is for them to be more approachable than security guards. Identifying and Tracking Calls for Service Diversions from Police to CHAT Program – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if there are plans to track calls for service diverted from a police officer response to park rangers or other alternative response models. The information could help measure the success and demand for the City’s civilian response models. The Council may also wish to ask how the 911 Department identifies calls for service that are good candidates for diversion. The City’s alternative response options include the CHAT program, Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) and the Social Worker Program (potentially this new Park Ranger program and police civilian responder program too). Answer was pending at the time of publishing this staff report. Growing Structural Deficit for FY23 Budget – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to provide a mid-year briefing on the estimated structural deficit for FY23 and how ARPA funding this fiscal year creates ongoing costs that could need ARPA funding next fiscal year. Answer was pending at the time of publishing this staff report. Request REP Commission Review – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to present the park ranger proposal to the REP Commission and share feedback and recommendations. The Racial Equity in Policing Commission was presented with the Park Ranger proposal at their November 3rd meeting. The Commission was supportive of the program. Their comments were primarily around concern for ranger safety, and they were curious about training and equipment. They would like another update in January. Training and Equipment for Park Rangers – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what training and equipment would be provided to park rangers. The rangers would not have firearms. Training: -Basic CPR, AED, and First Aid training. Possible EMT and Naloxone training for lead rangers -Pepper Spray Training -Radio Use training -SLC Code Training -Vistelar an online training course program is used by SLC Compliance. Page | 4 -Management of Aggressive Behavior (MOAB Used by Seattle Parks Dept.) o De-Escalation o Conflict management o Crisis Intervention o Personal Safety o Understanding bias and triggers – Implicit Bias Training o Cultural Sensitivity & Public Relations o Radio Training Equipment: -Light duty truck -Side by side -Mountain Bikes -Uniform -Cell phone, radio, laptop, flashlight, etc. Reviewing Staffing Level – The Council may wish to ask the Administration when and how the pilot program’s staffing level will be reviewed to determine if fewer or more positions are warranted to meet the level of community need. Software such as Report Exec. Is available to track incidents that can be analyzed to better understand where incidents are happening, track daily logs and report incidents. Once created, the pilot program can be evaluated every six months to determine if fewer or more positions are warranted to meet the level of community need. Calls for Service in Foothills – Could you please share the calls for service and on-views from the Foothills and natural lands for October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021? This is the same time period analyzed for City parks. Answer was pending at the time of publishing this staff report. C-2: Community Commitment Program Rapid Intervention Team Three New FTEs Sunsetting with ARPA – The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether the three new FTEs would sunset with ARPA funding availability. These positions would be solely expensed to ARPA funding and would sunset when the funding expires. Staffing Level and Community Need – the Council may wish to discuss with the Administration if the three additional FTEs would meet the level of need in the community and maximize the City’s partnership with the County Health Department. The role of this new Rapid Intervention Team would not replace or compete with the County Health Department abatements, instead this new program will assist individuals in smaller encampments and decrease the likelihood of smaller encampments becoming larger encampments. CAN Supervising Sustainability Employees – The Council may wish to ask why the three new employees would be in the Waste & Recycling Division of Sustainability but be coordinated by a supervisor in CAN? Because of the duties and responsibilities of these new proposed FTEs, they would require direct supervision from Sustainability. CAN will coordinate the logistics for all City staff involved with the new Rapid Intervention Team, such as the Police Department and the Waste and Recycling Division of Sustainability. On November 16, the Council held a second briefing, public hearing, and then closed the public hearing to adopt some items including: Page | 5 - A-5: Community Health Access Team (CHAT) Program Vehicles ($150,000 from $2 Million Holding Account; $150,000 goes to Fleet Fund) - A-6: Non-Represented Employees’ Job Salary Survey ($75,000 from General Fund Balance) - A-10: Community Health Access Team (CHAT) Program Personnel Transfer (Budget Neutral) - A-11: Rose Park Golf Course Water & Energy Efficiency Grant (Matching Funds) ($1,800,000 from the Golf Fund - All items in Section D Housekeeping except D-1 - All items in Section G Consent Agenda for Grant Awards - I-1: Council Office Reclassifications and Amending FY22 Appointed Pay Plan The Council is scheduled to continue deliberation of the remaining proposed items at the December 7 work session. The Council could take a final vote on some items at the formal meeting that same day, at a future formal meeting or decline to approve a proposed item. Budget Amendment Number Four includes forty-one proposed amendments and requested changes to thirteen funds. Total expenditures coming from Fund Balance are $2,884,735, and the Administration is requesting straw polls for two items which are found in Section A (New Budget Items). Additionally, the Council may wish to note that the Administration is proposing to add twenty-two ongoing FTE’s paid with one-time grant funding. If all the items are adopted as proposed, then Fund Balance would be $502,894 below the 13% minimum target established by the Council in FY 20. Fund Balance would however remain $3 million above 12%. American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Proposed Spending Items There are several proposed items that would spend nearly $14.5 million of American Rescue Plan Act or ARPA funding. This is one-time funding from the Federal Government for the City to respond to pandemic-related impacts and address recovery needs including revenue loss replacement and employee compensation. Many of the proposed ARPA-funded items would use one-time funding for one-time uses. However, a few items like the park ranger pilot program and expanded Community Commitment Program would add new full-time employees (FTEs) which create new ongoing costs. This is in addition to ongoing costs (FTEs/programs) paid for with ARPA dollars in the F22 budget, totaling approximately $22.3 million. These would add to the General Fund’s growing structural budget deficit in future fiscal years. It’s important to note that approving the items as proposed would also set in motion the need to spend ARPA dollars in FY23 (or use another funding source or identify budget cuts) to cover some of the new ongoing costs particularly new FTEs and ongoing police overtime. The Administration’s transmittal includes a summary spreadsheet showing how the City’s entire $85 million ARPA award has been used to-date, items proposed in this budget amendment and potential uses in FY23 and FY24. The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration how the City’s FY23 and FY24 annual budgets could be impacted by ARPA-funded items proposed in this budget amendment plus the $22.3 million of ongoing expenses in the FY22 annual budget paid for with one-time ARPA funding. Sales Tax Update (See Attachment 1) This attachment shows the confirmed sales tax revenues through the end of FY21. The data table shows sales tax in FY21 was $7.4 million higher than FY20 particularly the months of February through June. June was the highest sales tax revenue month on record for the City. The wholesale trade increased, and the biggest decline remains accommodation and food services. Inflation could also be a contributing factor to greater sales tax receipts. Revenue for FY 2021-22 Budget Adjustments Because the fiscal year just started the Fiscal Year 2022 projections are at budget. The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2022. Updated revenue projections are expected to be available for the next budget amendment and after the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is completed. Page | 6 Fund Balance Update The Administration is recommending to go below the 13% minimum target established by the Council in FY 20. This means the Fund Balance would be $502,894 below the target. Fund Balance would however remain $3 million above 12%. Previously the City has been advised that downward trends in fund balance percentage could have the potential to impact the City’s bond rating (needed to get desirable interest rates), and the previous minimum threshold was identified at 10%. Updated Fund Balance projections are expected to be available for the next budget amendment and after the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is completed. Page | 7 Impact Fees Update The Administration provided a summary of impact fee tracking, details on refunding amounts and dates and lists of unfinished projects with impact fee funding. The information is current as of October 29, 2021. An update since the information was transmitted is that the four police impact fee refunds listed for July through October in FY22 are not needed based on the adopted annual budget. As a result, the City is on-track with impact fee budgeting to have no refunds during all FY22. The Administration reports work is nearing completion to update the fire and parks sections of the impact fee plan. The transportation section was updated last year. Eligible projects for police impact fees are being identified. Type Unallocated Cash “Available to Spend”Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring Impact Fees Fire $1,487,183 More than a year away - Parks $8,948,216 More than a year away - Police $415,503 More than a year away - Transportation $6,101,644 More than a year away - Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract Page | 8 $1,583,500 ARPA Holding Account Update In the FY22 annual budget, the Council placed $1,583,500 into a holding account from 10 items proposed by the Administration. The Administration indicates that the holding account items are no longer being recommended. During deliberations in May and June the 10 items were determined to not be eligible for ARPA funding under the U.S. Treasury’s ARPA guidance. The holding account was created to give the Administration time for exploring whether any of the 10 items could be modified to be ARPA eligible. The Council could act in this budget amendment to free these dollars. Section A: New Items (note: to expedite the processing of this staff report, staff has included the Administration’s descriptions from the transmittal for some of these items) A-1: Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs ($128,888 from General Fund Balance and $294,820 from Enterprise Funds) The City has carried both excess liability and cyber security insurance since Fiscal Year 17 (FY17) and has not yet had to use either. However, premiums for each rose significantly higher than budgeted in the current fiscal year. Excess liability The Administration shared the following definition of excess liability insurance: Excess liability insurance covers judgments and claim settlements in excess of the City's $1,000,000 self-insured retention. While most claims against the City are subject to judgment limitations under the Governmental Immunity Act, federal claims, such as civil rights and employment claims, are not. The Administration attributes the increase to claims in the past year that met thresholds the City is required to report to the City’s insurance carrier. Cyber security The Administration shared the following definition of cyber security insurance: Cyber insurance covers third-party liability resulting from security breaches. It also covers data recovery, data breach response and crisis management, cyber-extortion, and ransomware. In recent years, the City has funded upgraded security resources, including more advanced systems and more cybersecurity training for City staff. The FY22 budget for the IMS Department also included $50,000 for an audit of the City’s current network security. Requests in future budgets are likely to continue including hardware and software upgrades that will improve security, as the City works to keep up with rapidly-advancing technology and increasing threats. Although these investments ultimately reduce the need to use the insurance, trade publications for the municipal information technology sector report a large increase in cyberattacks across the board, leading to higher premiums throughout the industry. Policy Question: The Council could confirm with the City Attorney's office whether an executive session on deployment of security and/or pending litigation could allow the Council to learn about any current claims and the City’s security profile. A-2: Department of Air Quality Lawnmower Exchange ($250,000 from General Fund Balance) The Utah Department of Air Quality (UDAQ) administers an annual gas-powered lawnmower and yard equipment exchange in order to reduce criteria pollutants in the areas of the Wasatch Front that are in non-attainment with the Clean Air Act air quality standards. Because the Wasatch Front is on track for attainment of wintertime PM2.5, UDAQ is not running a snowblower exchange this year. Instead, they are focusing on programs to reduce summertime ozone pollution, for which the Wasatch Front is out of attainment. UDAQ has $900,000 set aside to continue the exchanges for the foreseeable future. The size of the lawnmower exchange varies each year depending on the size of financial contributions from partners. UDAQ typically contributes between $300,000 and $400,000. The Sustainability Department is proposing a budget amendment of $250,000 from General Fund Balance to partner with UDAQ in FY22 on a gas-powered lawnmower exchange. This would facilitate exchanges for approximately 1,000 Salt Lake City residents. Salt Lake City participated in 2021, spending nearly $161,000 which Page | 9 helped 582 residents participate. In total, 509 gas powered mowers were exchanged (the remaining participants bought new mowers without exchanging an old one). This is the equivalent of removing 4.02 tons of pollution from the airshed each year. A majority of residents also opted to participate in the City’s Call 2 Haul program to have their gas mower picked up curbside and recycled by Salt Lake City Waste and Recycling. The Administration proposes continuing this program in FY 22 (spring 2022). The goal will be to increase participation from 582 to 1,000 with a continued focus on our Westside neighborhoods. The Administration anticipates greater awareness and uptake of the program in the coming year due to increased familiarity with the program, and plans to work with UDAQ on earlier, targeted outreach given the lessons learned from spring 2021. UDAQ anticipates the program logistics will change in FY 22 to facilitate easier participation and lower administrative burden. In particular, they are hoping to develop a phone app that participants will use to sign up and upload any required receipts. UDAQ is also envisioning the next program will offer a promotional discount code to be used toward the purchase of electric lawn equipment and an app would also help separate Salt Lake City residents from other participating Wasatch Front residents. This will reduce confusion as to who is eligible for curbside pickup of their old mowers. The Administration also indicates that they also hope the app will help keep the exchange open longer for Salt Lake City residents instead of opening, closing it, and opening it again while UDAQ verifies addresses. While the exact amount of the discounts have yet to be determined, the Sustainability Department proposes using $250,000 in City General Funds to facilitate approximately 1,000 gas-powered mower exchanges. This budget amendment would also fund temporary staffing expenses to assist with running curbside collection of old mowers through Call 2 Haul. This benefit was very popular last year and helped make this program more equitable to those who might not have the ability to haul their own mower to a metal recycler. Policy Questions: Expanding Program Beyond Lawnmowers – Council Members recently expressed interest in expanding this exchange to include other common gas-powered yard maintenance equipment like leaf blowers, chainsaws, trimmers, etc. The Council may wish to ask the Administration what would be necessary to expand the exchange program along these lines? Sustainability Funding Contributions – The Council may wish to ask if the Sustainability Department’s refuse, energy, or environment dollars could be available to contribute to this program? Context with the Annual budget – Given that this program is proposed to be funded with General Fund dollars, the Council could ask that it be included in the annual budget in future years. A-3: COVID Safe Building Improvements ($844,000 from General Fund Balance; $131,000 goes to IMS Fund) The Public Services Department identified several recommended building improvements to provide a safer environment protecting against the spread of disease. Consultants, health officials and current employees collaborated to identify these changes. The total cost is estimated at $844,000 and includes the following: - $250,000 for improved indoor air quality by upgrading existing HVAC systems to better capture airborne particles and contaminants using needlepoint devices - $165,000 for enhanced janitorial cleaning five days a week for the rest of the fiscal year. The cleaning schedule would adjust to COVID case counts and feedback from the public and employees - $131,000 for teleconferencing and meeting equipment for virtual and hybrid public meetings. This equipment and training would be available to the Mayor’s Office, Council Office and the City’s two dozen boards and commissions - $100,000 for reconfiguring cubicle office spaces - $100,000 for various personal protective equipment (PPE) and cleaning supplies including facemasks, hand sanitizer, disposable gloves, etc. - $44,000 for new chairs, tables, reconfigurations and small digital signs in meeting rooms (potentially including Room 138, Cannon Room and others) - $17,000 for one seasonal employee working 40 hours/week for six months except holidays to assist with visitors to the City & County Building Page | 10 - $16,000 for new chairs in the Committee of the Whole room - $10,000 for a public noticing digital sign within the ADA entrance at the City & County Building and at Plaza 349 - $6,000 for desks and chairs to create two check-in areas: one on the first floor between elevators, a second near the east entrance o CBI guards would cover the check-in desk as part of the City’s existing contract o Procedures are being developed for this new function - $5,000 for appointment management software at the entrance of the building which allows IDing and monitoring building occupancy Policy Questions: Equipment for Hybrid Meetings – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what virtual and hybrid meeting equipment and training would be made available to the City’s two dozen boards and commissions. The Council may also wish to ask if the Administration has looked into providing hybrid meeting training to community councils. Public Access to City & County Building – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if a policy is being developed to govern public access during the pandemic to the City & County Building and how the public would make appointments on the new management software. Currently some departments report offering limited hours for walk-in visitors and other departments are scheduling appointments. Public Notice Digital Signs – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if public noticing digital signs are also needed at the Main Library and the Public Safety Building so the same information is available at multiple locations across the Civic Campus. Many notices are currently posted on doors with paper. Other Funding Sources for this Project – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if ARPA dollars could be used for these expenses (note: this is not recommended for ARPA dollar use by the Administration). A-4: Pulled prior to Submission A-5: Community Health Access Team (CHAT) Program Vehicles ($150,000 from $2 Million Holding Account; $150,000 goes to Fleet Fund) *straw poll requested* Note this item is related to items A-10 and C-1 In the FY22 annual budget, the Council created a holding account with just over $2 million from “Funding our Future” public safety dollars, for diversifying public safety civilian response models. This item is requesting $150,000 which would be the first use of that holding account. Note that the Council carried over into FY22 a separate almost $2.3 million holding account originally created in FY21 for implementing recommendations from the Racial Equity in Policing Commission, the Council’s audit of the Police Department, and the public. The $150,000 would purchase three new hybrid Ford Explorer SUVs to accommodate increased program staffing. Two of the vehicles will be used by CHAT staff and the third by the Medical Division in the Fire Department supporting the program. The estimated cost per vehicle is $50,000 including fuel, upgrades, and maintenance. The CHAT program currently has one vehicle for two paramedics responding as a team. The program is overseen by a captain. Item A-10 proposes transferring three social worker FTEs from the Police Department to the Fire Department. This staffing increase and corresponding vehicle increase would allow the CHAT program to operate two separate teams. The social workers in the CHAT Program would operate out of the Public Safety Building rather than the Community Connections Center. The Administration stated the CHAT Program would operate independent of the Social Worker Program. The paramedic would assess a subject’s medical condition and the social worker would assess their psychological condition. The Fire Department responds to approximately 24,000 medical assessment calls annually. If the CHAT program provides better response options to this frequent call type, then the Fire Department may seek to further expand the program in the future. The Fire Department and 911 Department presented the expanded CHAT program proposal to the REP Commission in September which was supportive of this proposal. Page | 11 An expanded CHAT program with the added skillsets of social workers would respond to calls related to mental health and homelessness. Some call types are ineligible for CHAT program response including when a weapon is present or there are threats of violence. This has the potential to divert some calls away from a law enforcement response so police officers could address other calls for service. The Administration stated the CHAT program responds to calls for service that (1) do not meet the criteria for emergency service or (2) do not benefit from the scope of training provided to paramedics and EMTs Policy Questions: Identifying and Tracking Calls for Service Diversions from Police to CHAT Program – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if there are plans to track calls for service diverted from a police officer response to the CHAT program or other alternative response models. The information could help measure the success and demand for the City’s civilian response models. The Council may also wish to ask how the 911 Department identifies calls for service that are good candidates for diversion. The City’s alternative response options include the CHAT program, Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) and the Social Worker Program (potentially a new Park Ranger program and police civilian responder program too). Equity in Access to Medical and Mental Health Services – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how an expanded CHAT program could improve access to medical and mental health services, especially in communities that historically have disproportionately less access. Aligning Operating Hours to Mental Health Crisis Call Times – The Council’s operational audit of the Police Department recommended social worker program and Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) hours change to include evenings. The Council may wish to ask the Administration if an expanded CHAT program would have operating hours in the evening. The auditors provided the below graphics showing most mental health-related calls occur in the evening which is outside the CIT program’s operating hours. Mental Health-related Calls for Service by Hour of the Day Page | 12 Straw Poll Request: Does the Council wish to hold a straw poll for this item? The Administration has requested a straw poll given the significant delays in receiving vehicle orders during pandemic-related supply shortages. A-6: Non-Represented Employees’ Job Salary Survey ($75,000 from General Fund Balance) *straw poll requested* This request is intended for consultative services to be provided by a qualified third-party consultant or firm to conduct a compensation survey to assess, evaluate and compare the overall pay structure, including actual base pay and other job elements, of Salt Lake City’s non-represented employees to other public and private sector entities with whom the City competes for talent. The recommended survey project includes data collection, analysis, and the development and presentation of a report with recommendations for the City’s Department of Human Resources, Citizens Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC), and elected officials to consider. The survey will be conducted with a primary focus on cash compensation and rely on the same caliber and methodology as surveys previously completed for the City's public safety and AFSCME-covered employee groups (as completed by Mercer in early 2019 and 2020, respectively). Straw Poll Request: Does the Council wish to hold a straw poll for this item? The Administration has requested a straw poll to allow additional time for selecting a consultant, allowing the CCAC to review at a special meeting in the spring, and so that results might be available to inform the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for FY2023. A-7: Sugar House Special Assessment Area Analysis (SAA) ($60,000 from General Fund Balance) In June, the Sugar House Community Council wrote a letter to the Economic Development Department requesting the City explore an SAA for economic promotion in the business district. The only existing economic promotion SAA in the City is for the Downtown. Utah Code defines eligible economic promotion activities as “sponsoring festivals and markets, promoting business investment or activities, helping to coordinate public and private actions, and developing and issuing publications designed to improve the economic well-being of the commercial area.” (Utah Code 11-42-102 Section 19) The $60,000 of funding would allow the Department to hire consultants and bond counsel to determine specific rates and revenue estimates, impacted parcels, cost per property owner, legal description of the boundaries and draft the notice of intent to designate. There is a potential for the assessment to reimburse the General Fund for those upfront costs. Page | 13 There is some flexibility in what method is used to measure the assessment such as property frontage, property area, taxable value or a combination of these. The Council would need to adopt a resolution designating the rates, budgets, allowable uses and boundaries. An RFP would be issued to accept bids of interested organizations. The Sugar House Chamber may submit a bid. A letter would also be sent to all impacted property owners notifying them of the SAA process. An SAA requires support from at least 61% of property owners (not tenants / businesses leasing space) and periodic approval such as every three years for the Downtown SAA. Policy Questions: SAA Activities – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration what activities the new SAA would provide. For example, would an ambassador program be paid for like in the Downtown, North Temple, and Central Ninth/Ballpark areas? SAA Reimburse General Fund Balance – The Council may wish to request the Administration include reimbursement of the General Fund Balance for upfront costs be included in the SAA analysis. SAA Boundaries – The Council may wish to discuss whether to support the potential boundaries or if adjustments should be considered. For example, should the residential neighborhood north and south of Simpson Avenue be included when the SAA is focused on commercial areas and economic promotion? Council staff created the below map to show the potential boundaries. Note: once notices are sent it is very expensive to change boundaries, and may cause additional delays. Context with Annual Budget - Given that this is a new proposal to be funded with General Fund dollars, the Council could ask that it be evaluated in the context of the annual budget rather than a budget amendment. Approximate Potential Boundaries for Sugar House SAA 700 East; Interstate 80; 1300 East; Hollywood Avenue with extension north on 1100 East to Ramona Ave to 1200 East Page | 14 A-8: Sorenson Impact Center Social Investment Study – Phase 2 Funding – ($150,000 from General Fund Balance) The Administration is requesting $150,000 from General Fund balance to continue the contract with the Sorenson Impact Center to work on Phase 2 of a Social Impact Investment study. A separate agenda item and staff report is planned for the larger scope of this topic. The Council may discuss adding the following principles/conditions in considering allocating the funding for the phase 2 work (note: this may change given the discussion during that agenda item): - The Council allocates $150,000 in Budget Amendment #4, for the Sorenson Impact Center to continue work on this potential program, with the understanding that: o The goal of the program is generational change, and in order to do that it must be ongoing beyond the initial investment term. o The City’s investment will not supplant existing programs and funding, and that assurances are obtained from partner agencies that this understanding will continue for the duration of any program created with this seed money. o The Sorenson Impact Center engage the totality of groups that provide these services and conduct transparent evaluation processes to determine which partners are best positioned to deliver this long-term generational change. o There be strict and transparent metrics to show goals are reached, particularly that the opportunity index score is improving in areas where it currently lags. A-9: Pulled prior to Submission A-10: Community Health Access Team (CHAT) Program Personnel Transfer (Budget Neutral) Note this item is related to items A-5 and C-1 This item would transfer three FTEs from the Police Department to the Fire Department including two social workers and one case manager that is a licensed clinical social worker. See A-5 for the full write-up. A-11: Rose Park Golf Course Water & Energy Efficiency Grant (Matching Funds) ($1,800,000 from the Golf Fund) *straw poll requested* The Departments of Public Lands and Public Utilities are working together on a grant application to help fund installation of an updated landscape irrigation system and other water conservation measures at Rose Park Golf Course. The grant is sponsored by the federal Bureau of Reclamation and would total $1,889,371. Salt Lake City’s match for the grant would consist of the following: Cash Staff Labor Contracted Services Department of Public Lands | Golf Division $1,800,000 $61,023 $0 Department of Public Utilities $0 $21,348 $7,000 Subtotal $1,800,000 $82,371 $7,000 Total City Cost-Share $1,889,371 The resulting $3,778,742 would be used to replace the existing irrigation system with new equipment, including high-efficiency nozzles that allow the watering levels to match turf type. In addition, some areas of fairway grass, which requires a lot of water, will be removed and re-seeded with drought-tolerant grasses, and the square footage of out-of-bounds rough areas will increase. The Golf Division estimates that Rose Park’s total irrigated areas can be reduced by 25% this way without impacting play, leading to significant water savings and furthering the goal of this grant funding. Note that these changes are distinct from those begun in 2015, under a contract with Siemens, in which a process was developed and implemented to draw secondary water from the Jordan River. That work included a new storage vault, pump system and some existing head upgrades, while this grant and the City’s match would fund the irrigation system itself, as well as the turf changes. In response to a Council staff question about the potential to access Bureau of Reclamation funds for similar projects at the City’s other courses, the Golf Division identified two limits: Page | 15 1.the challenges the Division faces with setting aside large amounts for matching funds; and 2.the level of competition for these grants. They believe that Rose Park is a particularly attractive candidate for these funds because of the potential to shift such a large share of fairway turf to be drought tolerant. The three other courses the Division reports as needing irrigation system replacements are Mountain Dell, Nibley and Forest Dale. Bonneville and Glendale were upgraded as part of the 2015 Siemens contract. Straw Poll Request: Does the Council wish to hold a straw poll for this item? The Administration has requested a straw poll given the timing of the expected grant award and when the City would need to confirm acceptance if the application is successful. A-12: Public Lands Park Ranger Pilot Program ($1,577,291 from General Fund Balance; $195,720 goes to Fleet Fund; $69,247 from ARPA) Note: this item is related to items C-1, E-3 and E-4 The Administration is proposing creation of a pilot program with 19 new FTEs in the Public Lands Department including two sergeants, 16 rangers and one support position. The total annual cost for a sergeant is estimated at $138,787 and for a ranger is estimated at $111,400. Job descriptions for the two positions were pending at the time of publishing this staff report. The Administration stated 12 rangers would be needed at a minimum to launch this new pilot program. The 19 FTEs are being recommended for a larger program. The program would operate from 8am to midnight seven days a week. The Administration states the rangers may serve as law enforcement officers. However, rangers would be unarmed and unlike police officers would not be Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) certified. Rangers would operate out of existing City facilities in parks including the soon to be redeveloped Fisher Mansion Carriage House and possibly temporary trailers. Rangers would focus on the Jordan River Trail, Pioneer Park, Liberty Park, and Fairmont Park. Rangers are not expected to operate in the Foothills or outlying natural areas. The total annual cost is estimated at $2,350,983. The request before the Council is for a half year funding of $1,175,491 and $401,800 of one-time costs including three trucks and two light response vehicles. The total cost for the remainder of FY22 is estimated at $1,577,291. The nearly $1.6 million cost in FY22 is proposed to be paid for from General Fund Balance. This item also proposes a reimbursement to Fund Balance for salary restorations resulting from the FY21 hiring freeze. ARPA dollars would provide $1,508,044 to Fund Balance as flexible General Fund dollars available for any use. This is the maximum salary restoration amount allowed under U.S. Treasury guidance. The remaining gap of $69,247 would come directly from ARPA for eligible supplies and services such as homeless outreach. The salary restoration using ARPA dollars in FY23 is estimated at $1,545,746 which creates a funding gap of $805,237 compared to the program’s annual cost. Creation of this new ongoing pilot program and the limited available use of one-time ARPA dollars means the structural deficit in the annual budget could be larger in FY23. The Public Lands Department (formerly Parks Division within Public Services Department) previously paid for police officer overtime in parks. The table below summarizes these costs from recent fiscal years. Fiscal Year Police Officer Overtime Cost Notes FY2018 $63,226 Overtime was paid over a four month period FY2019 $226,569 Overtime was paid over a seven month period FY2020 $23,835 Prolonged reduced staffing of police officers resulted in significantly reduced overtime in parks FY2021 $9,738 Prolonged reduced staffing of police officers resulted in significantly reduced overtime in parks FY2022 $0 Private security firm used to lock park restrooms at night and provide park security patrols The pilot program’s purpose and goals include: - Serving as law enforcement officers in parks (not POST-certified like police officers) Page | 16 - Providing services and information to park users - Assisting with homeless outreach efforts - Making people feel welcome and safe in parks - Deterring inappropriate activity - Gaining voluntary compliance of park codes and rules - Reducing the number of annual vandalism incidents and associated costs for repair/replacement Policy Questions: Effectiveness of Civilian Rangers Addressing Criminal Issues in Parks – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration the limits of civilian park rangers addressing criminal issues in parks and when rangers would need to rely on a police officer response. The Administration states the rangers may serve as law enforcement officers but would not be POST-certified like police officers. The Council may also wish to ask the Administration how park rangers would coordinate with the Police Department’s parks bike squad. Private Security Guards in Parks – The Public Lands Department currently hires private security guards to lock restrooms in parks and provide security patrols. The Council may wish to ask the Administration for the pros and cons of creating a park ranger program instead of continuing the current practice of hiring private security guards. Identifying and Tracking Calls for Service Diversions from Police to CHAT Program – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if there are plans to track calls for service diverted from a police officer response to park rangers or other alternative response models. The information could help measure the success and demand for the City’s civilian response models. The Council may also wish to ask how the 911 Department identifies calls for service that are good candidates for diversion. The City’s alternative response options include the CHAT program, Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) and the Social Worker Program (potentially this new Park Ranger program and police civilian responder program too). Growing Structural Deficit for FY23 Budget – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to provide a mid-year briefing on the estimated structural deficit for FY23 and how ARPA funding this fiscal year creates ongoing costs that could need ARPA funding next fiscal year. Request REP Commission Review – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to present the park ranger proposal to the REP Commission and share feedback and recommendations. Training and Equipment for Park Rangers – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what training and equipment would be provided to park rangers. The rangers would not have firearms. Reviewing Staffing Level – The Council may wish to ask the Administration when and how the pilot program’s staffing level will be reviewed to determine if fewer or more positions are warranted to meet the level of community need. A-13: WITHDRAWN BY THE ADMINISTRATION Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section (None) Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section C-1: ARPA Funding – Public Safety and Homeless Outreach – Public Lands Park Ranger Program ($1,064,368 – Miscellaneous Grants) (See Items A-12, E-3 and E-4.) Note: this item is related to items A-12, E-3 and E-4. See item A-12 for the full write-up. This item is an accounting step for transferring funding to the General Fund. C-2: Community Commitment Program Rapid Intervention Team ($164,750 from ARPA) Note: this item is related to items E-5, E-6 and E-8 The Administration is requesting the Council approve three new FTEs to work in the Waste & Recycling Division of the Sustainability Department. The employees would provide a new City cleaning team working with Advantage Page | 17 Services and the Homeless Engagement and Response Team coordinator in CAN. Sometimes employees in the Public Services and Sustainability departments are diverted from regular duties to assist the Community Commitment Program and Health Department. The titles and job descriptions for the three new FTEs were pending at the time of publishing this staff report. The total annual estimated cost per FTE is $87,600 which would be $262,800 for a full fiscal year. This item is requesting $164,750 to provide seven and a half months of funding in FY22. The three FTEs would be listed on the grant-funded section of the staffing document. As with the park ranger program in earlier items, these new FTEs could add to the structural budget deficit by using one-time funding for a new ongoing cost. Policy Questions: Three New FTEs Sunsetting with ARPA – The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether the three new FTEs would sunset with ARPA funding availability. Staffing Level and Community Need – the Council may wish to discuss with the Administration if the three additional FTEs would meet the level of need in the community and maximize the City’s partnership with the County Health Department. CAN Supervising Sustainability Employees – The Council may wish to ask why the three new employees would be in the Waste & Recycling Division of Sustainability but be coordinated by a supervisor in CAN? Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Economic Development Loan Fund Move Housing ($100,000 – Housing and $100,000 – General Fund) Last March, in Budget Amendment #7 of FY21, the Administration requested, and the Council approved, a $100,000 appropriation to the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF) to assist restaurants and bars by offering funding to expand outdoor dining as an aid to pandemic recovery. The Department of Economic Development (DED) stated at that time that its intent in using the EDLF was to ensure that funding would not lapse due to delays caused by the processes of program development and identification of recipients. As it turned out, DED did not distribute any of these funds because “forgivable loans are not permitted under the EDLF Loan guidelines.” Now the Department is requesting the funds be moved from EDLF to a separate account so that these funds may be distributed as grants, rather than loans. If the Council chooses to do so, DED would transmit a resolution for consideration to set the guidelines for the proposed Outdoor Business Activity Grant Program. The program would provide up to $5,000 for outdoor dining/retail costs or $10,000 for costs incurred in hosting an “Open Streets” event. The Department noted in the BA #7 discussions that they would prioritize areas of the City using “social justice datasets,” and reach out directly to businesses located within these areas, as well as work with the diverse Chambers of Commerce, Community Councils, and other community partners. Since that time, the City’s Chief Equity Officer has been named and is working on frameworks and measurements to be implemented Citywide. In the meantime, the Chief Equity Officer provided DED the GARE (Government Alliance on Race and Equity) Racial Equity Toolkit, and DED is using that framework in all new project creation, including this project. Policy Question: Would the Council like to consider its support for this program now or after more specific guidelines are proposed by the Department? If these funds stay in the EDLF they will not drop to fund balance. D-2: Increase Grant Fund ($0.00 – Miscellaneous Grants) The annual budget proposed funding from the American Recovery Plan Act (ARPA) for revenue replacement. During budget adoption, the expense was adjusted based on updated grant guidelines. This increased the expense side of the grant fund, but recognition of the revenue was not included. This request adjusts the revenue side to recognize the revenue side of the transaction in the Grant Fund. This proposal will bring the Fund into balance in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Page | 18 D-3: Premium Holiday – Other Funds (Refuse, Golf, Fleet and IMs) ($0.00 – Miscellaneous Grants) The Premium Holiday was submitted with the budget with the transfer from the Insurance Fund, but the transfer into other funds was not included. This amendment is to balance the inter-fund transfers. D-4: GPS Housekeeping ($74,600 – General Fund and Fleet Fund) For FY22 there is an accounting change to put the GPS fees for vehicles in the Fleet budget. We missed the piece to move the current budgets over to Fleet. Public Services has a budget of $39,203; Public Lands has a budget of $26,797; and CAN has a budget $8,600 that we need to move to Fleet. D-5: Signage FTE Correction ($51,847 – General Fund) In the Mayor's Recommended Budget, an FTE for Signage for the Planning & Ecological Services Division was initially approved, but later reduced. However, the funding was again inadvertently reduced at the Council level, thus doubling the reduction. This housekeeping request is to replace the funding that was inadvertently cut from the Signage budget. D-6: General Obligation Series 2021A Bonds ($23,400,000 – CIP Fund, and $200,000 – Debt Service) In November 2018, voters authorized the issuance of up to $87 million in general obligation bonds to fund street construction. The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021A will be issued in November 2021 as the third issuance of the authorization. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the receipt of bond proceeds and the expenditure budget to pay for construction of the street projects associated with the bonds. It also creates expenditure budget to pay the costs of issuance for the bonds. Bond proceeds will be allocated to five project cost centers in Fund 83 and one cost center in Fund 81 for the costs of issuance associated with the bond. Two cost centers will receive $6,000,000 each for the 200 South Phase 1 & 2 (400 W to 900 E) projects. A third cost center will receive $6,800,000 for the 1100 East (900 S to Warnock Ave) project. The fourth cost center will receive $1,600,000 for the 300 North (300 W to 1000 W) project. The fifth cost center will receive $3,000,000 for local streets. The proceeds to pay the costs of issuance associated with the bonds will be deposited to the debt service cost center in Fund 81. D-7: Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds Series 2021A ($10,665,000, $10,400,000 and $4,900,000 – Debt Service) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, were issued in June 2012 for the purpose of replacing the North Temple Viaduct and improving North Temple Boulevard. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B, were issued in November 2013 for the purpose of financing a portion of the costs of the Sugarhouse Streetcar and paying for the portion of various improvements to create a "greenway" within the corridor. The Series 2012A and 2013B bonds are being refunded with the Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A. This budget amendment will create the revenue budget for the receipt of bond proceeds and the expenditure budget to pay off the old bonds and to pay the costs of issuance for the bonds. Two Local Building Authority bonds will also be refunded by the Series 2021A bonds. This budget amendment creates the budget for the transfer to the LBA to pay those off. A separate LBA budget amendment is being submitted to create budget for paying off those bonds. D-8: Budget Carry Forward ($1,175,000 – General Fund) In the General Fund there were several budgets that did not have encumbrances at the close of fiscal year 2021 the Administration would request Council approval to roll budget for the projects into fiscal year 2022. The budgets requested are listed below: CC CC Name OC OC Description Amount 0900503 Demographer Contract 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $50,000.00 0900925 Financial Risk Assessment 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $100,000.00 0900930 Gentrification Mitigation Study 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $100,000.00 0900705 Washington DC Contract 2324 Special Consultant $75,000.00 0900513 NW Northpoint Plan Airport 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $50,000.00 0900508 Home to Transit Program 2590 Other Expenses $800,000.00 TOTAL $1,175,000.00 Page | 19 Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: COVID-19 Local Assistance Matching Grant Program – New Water Reclamation Facility: Influent Pump Station and Force Mains (Water and Sewer Infrastructure) ($2 million from ARPA) See Attachment 2 for the grant memo and Council staff report The Mayor‘s Administration has submitted a grant application requesting funding of $10 million from the State of Utah to help fund the construction of the new Influent Pump Station force mains, (a sub-project of the Water Reclamation Facility), and replace the existing pump station and force mains which are at the end of their service life. This budget amendment item proposes to set aside $2 million in ARPA funds for the required match. The Council may wish to note that as part of the grant application, the City has committed a $40 million dollar match for the grant to increase the competitiveness of the application. According to the Administration, the source of the match includes the Department of Public Utilities planned utility revenue bond issuances, and the secured loan through the Federal Water Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act. E-2: Winter Shelter Support ($1 million from ARPA) This item would provide $1 million of flexible funding for emergency winter shelter support potentially including shelter operations. The funding is for winter shelter anywhere in Salt Lake County. U.S. Treasury guidance allows municipalities to spend outside of city limits and/or pool ARPA funding for regional projects and programs for eligible activities subject to compliance with reporting requirements and showing a benefit is being received for City residents proportionate to the ARPA funding amount. Policy Questions Funding Winter Shelter Outside or Inside City Limits – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if the funding would go to a winter shelter outside or inside of city limits. Hotel/Motel Voucher Flexibility – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if the funding could be used for hotel/motel vouchers instead of costs related to a winter shelter. E-3: Public Safety and Homeless Outreach – Salary Restoration – Public Lands Park Ranger Program (See Items A-12, C-1, and E-4) ($443,677 from ARPA) Note: this item is related to items A-12, C-1, and E-4. See item A-12 for the full write-up. This item is an accounting step for transferring funding to the General Fund. E-4: Public Safety and Homeless Outreach – Public Lands Park Rangers (See Item A-12, C-1 and E-3) ($69,244 from ARPA) Note: this item is related to items A-12, C-1 and E-3. See item A-12 for the full write-up. This item is an accounting step for using ARPA to directly fund eligible homeless outreach services and supplies in the new program. E-5: Community Commitment Program Rapid Intervention Team Vehicles ($160,500 from ARPA) Note: this item is related to items C-2, E-6 and E-8. See the other items for additional info. This item would purchase two F-350 pickup trucks and a trailer to be used by the three new employees in Waste and Recycling as part of the expanded Community Commitment Program. E-6: Community Commitment Program Additional Police Support ($1,505,920 from ARPA) Note: this item is related to items C-2, E-6 and E-8 The Administration is requesting $1,505,920 of funding for the Police Department to provide staffing to support the homeless encampment cleanup and camp re-establishment stabilization as requested by the Salt Lake County Health Department. Police officers working extra overtime shifts will provide security to ensure the cleanups can proceed in an environment that will be safe for all involved. Staffing numbers will vary depending on the size, number of cleanups and the location. Activity # days Officers # hours Rate Amount Requested Major Cleanups 14 40 10 $65 $364,000 Minor Cleanups*and area stabilization 122 24 6 $65 $1,141,920 Total Requested $1,505,920 *previously utilized on-duty resources that are no longer available Page | 20 It’s important to note that these overtime shifts are voluntary and there is no guarantee all shifts will be filled. Prior overtime shifts for the Community Commitment Program were approximately 75% filled. As of the October 2, the Police Department had spent $859,460 of the $1,741,890 overtime budget which is 49% of the available budget. If this trend continues, then the Police Department would be projected to go over the available overtime budget around mid-fiscal year. The Council increased the ongoing overtime budget by $650,000 as part of the FY22 annual budget. Policy Questions: Total Cost of the Community Commitment Program – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what is the total cost of the Community Commitment Program if Budget Amendment #4 is approved as requested? This information was requested and was pending at the time of publishing this staff report. Area Stabilization Examples – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for examples of area stabilization outside of immediate cleanup sites. E-7: Pulled prior to Submission to allow for the completion of Phase 2 of the Social Impact Investment. E-8: Community Commitment Program Rapid Intervention Team Cleaning by Advantage Services ($57,000 from ARPA) Note: this item is related to items C-2, E-5, and E-6 This item would provide $57,000 of additional funding for Advantage Services to conduct cleaning services related to the Community Commitment Program. Policy Questions: Public and/or Private Property Cleaning – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if Advantage Services cleaning is limited to publicly owned property or if private property is ever eligible. Quintuple Funding Next Fiscal Year – The Administration indicates the use of ARPA for cleaning by Advantage Services is expected to increase five-fold from $57,000 to $290,000 in FY23. The Council may wish to ask why the increase is planned and what changes to the cleaning services could the public expect. E-9: ARPA Westside Community Initiative (Perpetual Housing Fund) ($4 million from ARPA going to a New Holding Account in the Grant Fund) See Attachment 3 for the September 14 transmittal with the proposed framework. The Administration is requesting $4 million from ARPA to seed a perpetual housing fund dedicated to the Westside of the City defined as west of Interstate 15. The dedicated housing funds from the Inland Port Authority Jurisdictional Boundary would provide an ongoing revenue stream. The RDA Board received an initial briefing on this concept at the September 14 meeting. RDA staff are refining the draft policy and will return to the Board for a follow up discussion in the coming months. The Council could wait to appropriate the $4 million or place it into a holding account until the policy is adopted by the RDA Board. The draft program goals include: - Develop land with a long-term approach to continuously serve a community-defined purpose (could use a ground-lease approach) - Create opportunities for revenue generation while balancing the implementation of public benefits (revenue would be reinvested back into the fund) - Assist the Westside in mitigating gentrification and displacement (the City’s ongoing study to mitigate gentrification could inform the program policy) - Give lower income households the opportunity to build wealth through ownership (similar to a community land trust model aka a shared-equity model) - Engage community members in development decisions - Leverage resources for other neighborhood development purposes (such as subsidizing deeply affordable housing, commercial space, public infrastructure and art) - Collaborate with other partners to broaden the pool of funding and expertise Page | 21 - Carry out efforts with a collective impact approach (including measurable results to report back to the RDA Board and the public) E-10: Nonprofit and Business Assistance Community Grants ($4 million from ARPA going to a New Account in the Grant Fund) The Administration is proposing $4 million for new one-time community grants split into two separate offerings: $2 million for business assistance managed by the Economic Development Department (EDD) and $2 million for nonprofit assistance managed by the Community and Neighborhoods (CAN) Department. The grants must be used for eligible activities under the U.S. Treasury’s ARPA guidance and meet Federal reporting, compliance and spending deadlines. Meeting these requirements could create a significant workload for the City’s Finance Department and Attorney’s Office. For example, some potential categories are narrowly eligible only for evidence based programs and practices which must have published research supporting interventions producing desired outcomes. The Treasury is also expected to issue updated final guidance in the coming months. An ad-hoc committee, or two (unclear at time of publishing this report), would be created to review applications, question applicants, and have delegated final funding authority from the Council to make funding awards. The committee(s) would include staff from the two departments managing the grants (EDD and CAN), Mayor’s Office, Council Office, and a to be determined number of volunteers from several City boards and commissions. The two departments report a request for proposals would be issued with a one-month window for applicants to submit proposals. Then the committee(s) would score and rank applications over two weeks and make final decisions. Funding would be distributed the following month. Policy Questions: Delegation of Authority for Deciding Funding Awards – The Council may wish to discuss whether to delegate authority to the ad-hoc committee(s) or use another approach. For example, the Council could elect to use the established process the City has for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), annual grants like CDBG from the U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Department, and one-time CARES Act relief grants. Under the existing process, the CDCIP Board reviews applications submitted during the open and competitive process, asks questions of applicants at public meetings, then provides funding recommendations to the Mayor who provides a second set of funding recommendations, next the Council deliberates the proposed recommendations, holds a public hearing and makes final funding awards. Equity Considerations – The Council may wish to discuss whether funding should have equity considerations built-in to the framework. For example, during the pandemic Council Members discussed the following categories in other grant programs: businesses in and nonprofits serving the Westside, women-owned and/or minority-owned businesses, nonprofits serving low-income residents, programs bridging the digital divide, food insecurity, increasing access to medical services and vaccines, etc. Applicant Assistance – The Council may wish to ask the departments what community assistance resources will be available for interested organizations to fill out applications? For example, where will in-person computer labs be publicly accessible, in what languages will the applications and instructions be available, who is the single-point of contact for each of the two grant programs, how will potential applicants learn about the opportunity, etc. Framework for the Grants – The Council may wish to ask the departments to return with proposed details of a grants framework such as the CIP and CDBG processes. This could include information like recommended grant program categories, funding minimums and/or maximums, required application information, and public engagement steps. Section F: Donations (None) Section G: Council Consent Agenda Page | 22 G-1: Police Department Asset Forfeiture Grant ($1,500 – Miscellaneous Grants) The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for and received a $1,500 grant award from the State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), under the State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) program. The SAFG program funds crime prevention and law enforcement activities within specific guidelines. CCJJ developed the SAFG program as a means of evaluating and distributing state forfeiture funds. The funds will be used for confidential informant funds to enhance investigations in narcotics-related cases. A public hearing was held 9/7/21 for this grant application. G-2: Utah Department of Health – Bureau of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Grant, FY22 Per Capita Allocation ($10,250 – Miscellaneous Grants) The Fire Department applied for and was awarded $10,250 of grant funding from the Utah Department of Health, Bureau of Emergency Medical Services. This funding will be used towards the purchase of a 12-Lead Cardiac Monitor and medical supplies relating to the provision of Emergency Medical Services as funding permits. A Public Hearing was held on 2/16/21 for the grant applications on this award. G-3: State of Utah, CCJJ (Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice), Jurisdictions with Halfway Houses and Parole Violator Center Grant, Law Enforcement Services Account (LESA) The Police Department has applied for and been awarded a $295,570 grant from the State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice, in support of the Jurisdictions with Halfway Houses and Parole Violator Centers grant. This grant provides funding for law enforcement agencies that provide services directly to areas with halfway houses or parole violator centers, or both. The Police Department will use these funds for law enforcement overtime related to reducing criminal activity including targeted enforcement operations, increased patrol response, and responding to mental health calls for service. The Department will also utilize funds for case transcription services, six overt camera units and maintenance/repairs/supplies for units in the Department's camera program. A public hearing was held 9/7/21 for this grant application. G-4: Utah State Office for Victims of Crime, 2021-23 VOCA Victims of Crime Act Grant ($364,162 – Miscellaneous Grants) The Police Department applied for and received a $364,162.48 grant from the State of Utah, Office for Victims of Crime under the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) program, to be used for the continuation of the Victim Advocate Program. These funds will be used to pay for salary and fringe for 4 existing full-time Victim Advocate positions and all of the part-time Victim Advocate positions. This grant also covers the costs for Rita, the program's facility dog. Additionally, there are supplies for the program, emergency funds for assisting victims, and training for Advocate staff. No match is required by the funding agency. VOCA funds cover local and national conferences and trainings needed to meet statutory training requirements for the Victim Advocates. It also provides and emergency fund that can be used when no other victim funding options are available - these funds can be used for food, clothing, shelter, transportation and 911 phones for victims of violent crime. Additionally, it provides for supplies such as Victim Advocate brochures, Traumatic Death Handbooks, cell phone costs, etc. A $109,938.89 match is required which will be satisfied by the salary and benefits of City funded Victim Advocates and the Program Coordinator. In-kind matching funds are provided by the student interns/volunteers that participate in the Victim Advocate Program. A Public Hearing was held 9/7/21 on this grant application. G-5: Department of Workforce Services, Housing & Community Development Division, FY22 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant Program ($370,735 – Miscellaneous Grants) The Community and Neighborhoods Dept. applied for and received State Department of Workforce Services funding of $370,735 to continue efforts to encourage businesses, residents, Homeless Resource Center (HRC) operators and guests to participate in constructive community engagement opportunities and encourage service-based interventions in order to successfully integrate the HRCs into the fabric of their host neighborhoods and ensure the safety of those neighborhoods. The SLC Mitigation team currently consists of a SLC Community Engagement Coordinator, VOA Business and Community Liaison, and VOA Outreach Case Manager. This application requests to continue the current team and expand the team to include an additional VOA Business and Community Liaison, additional VOA Outreach Case Manager, and a VOA Outreach Peer Support Specialist, and three new positions as part of the City's existing Page | 23 Downtown Ambassador program - tailored to the areas surrounding the HRCs (King, Miller, and Youth). A Public Hearing was held on October 5, 2021. G-6: Utah State Department of Public Safety – 2021 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) ($42,500 – Miscellaneous Grants) The Emergency Management Services Division received a $42,500 FY2021 EMPG grant from the State of Utah, Department of Public Safety. This grant is awarded on an annual basis to jurisdictions to help offset costs of planning and updating emergency preparedness plans, conduct emergency preparedness exercises and produce materials and other media for public educational outreach and training pertaining to emergency preparedness. SLC's population increases from 180,000 to an estimated 310,000 each workday. Should a disaster occur during the workday, employees become a part of the SLC emergency response, but are not trained to assist themselves or others. These funds will offset costs in providing National Incident Management System (NIMS) training to SLC staff with emergency response responsibilities during a disaster or other significant event. The funds will be used to fund community preparedness activities, purchase training materials, supplies and equipment including books, brochures, handouts, etc. The grant requires a 50% match which will be satisfied with the Community Preparedness Coordinator's time and budgeted for within Emergency Management’s general fund. A public hearing will be held for this grant application. G-7: Cities of Service, Johns Hopkins, Justice for the Jordan Grant – Love your Block – ($100,000 – Miscellaneous Grants) The office of the Mayor applied for and received $100,000 in grant funding for the Justice for the Jordan, Love your Block grant. The grant provides: 1. $60,000 to hire a Love your Block Fellow for 2 years. 2. $40,000 to distribute to the community as mini grants 3. The City is also required to engage 2 AmeriCorps VISTA volunteers, one each year of the grant. 4. The City also receives technical assistance from Cities of Service The Cities of Service Love Your Block program connects mayor’s offices with community residents to revitalize their neighborhoods one block at a time. Typically, cities implementing Love Your Block invite community groups to identify priority projects and award mini-grants to support volunteer-fueled solutions that the community can implement. The City identifies a problem and then engages with volunteers within the neighborhoods of focus and engages them early in the project design phase as well as implementation and evaluation. The City identified the neighborhoods adjacent to the Jordan River in Glendale (census tract 1026, 1027.01, and 1028.01) as the target area. A public hearing was held October 5, 2021. G-8: Utah State Office for Victims of Crime, Violence Against Women Act, Domestic Violence Victim Advocate The City Prosecutors office applied for and received a $101,039 grant from the State of Utah, Office for Victims of Crime under the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) program, to be used for the Violence Against Women’s Act to fund Salt Lake City Prosecutor Domestic Violence Victim Advocate. The Prosecutor’s Office is requesting a Victim Advocate to assist and support victims of domestic violence as their cases move to the prosecution and adjudication phases. The services include information, education and advocacy through the case and prosecution, assistance with victim impact statements, support and accompaniment to court and meetings with investigators and prosecutors. The Victim Advocate assists in post release safety planning, preparation for court appearances, and jail release agreements. Until this year, Salt Lake County District Attorney Victim Services has provided this support for victims whose cases are adjudicate in Salt Lake City Justice Court. Funding cutbacks required the county to reassign the advocates to County prosecutions. Salt Lake City is applying for this new city position to fill the gap in services. The match is $12,630 each fiscal year, for a total of $25,260 for the two-year performance period of the grant. The match is met with cash available in the Office of the Attorney’s budget. A Public Hearing was held 6/15/21 on this grant application. Page | 24 Section I: Council Added Items I-1: Council Office Reclassifications and Amending FY22 Appointed Pay Plan The table below summarizes the reclassifications of six FTE appointed positions in the Council Office. Vacancy savings will cover the cost difference for the current fiscal year. Old Title / Grade New Title / Grade Communications Director / 31x Public Engagement & Communications Specialist III / 31x Public Engagement & Communications Specialist I / 26x Public Engagement & Communications Specialist II / 28x Public Policy Analyst II / 31x Senior Public Policy Analyst / 33x Public Policy Analyst II / 31x Senior Public Policy Analyst / 33x Associate Deputy Director / 37x Deputy Director / 39x Senior Public Policy Analyst / 33x Legislative & Policy Manager / 37x ATTACHMENTS 1. Sales Tax Update and Chart 2. COVID-19 Local Assistance Matching Grant Program – New Water Reclamation Facility: Influent Pump Station and Force Mains (Memo from Administration and Council staff report) 3. Westside Communities Initiative RDA Transmittal from September 14 4. Draft Motion Sheet for Adopting Some Items 5. Park Ranger Sergeant Job Description 6. Gap Funding Analysis for Emergency Winter Overflow Shelter (February 2022) ACRONYMS ADA – Americans with Disabilities Act AFSCME – American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees ARPA – American Rescue Plan Act CAN – Community and Neighborhoods Department CCAC – Citizens Compensation Advisory Committee CCJJ – Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice CCP – Community Commitment Program CDBG – Community Development Block Grant CHAT – Community Health Access Team CIP – Capital Improvement Program CIT – Crisis Intervention Team EDLF – Economic Development Loan Fund EMPG – Emergency Management Performance Grant EMT – Emergency Medical Technician FTE – Full Time Equivalent Position FY – Fiscal Year GARE – Government Alliance on Race and Equity HRC – Homeless Resource Center HUD – United States Housing and Urban Development Department HVAC – Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning PPE – Personal Protective Equipment RDA – Redevelopment Agency REP – Racial Equity in Policing Commission SAA – Special Assessment Area TBD – To Be Determined UDAQ – Utah Department of Air Quality VISTA – Volunteers in Service to America VOCA – Victims of Crime Act Homelessness Related Issues Diagram February 8, 2022 Permanent High Needs Hotel/ Emergency Overflow -StH ongoing search for location somewhere in the county -City/County/State discussion about how to make it happen -Pending request of county council for $6m acquisition funding (March ’22) High Needs Motel/ Overflow Funding Gap- $603k -State Homelessness Council mtg Thurs Feb 10th. State proposal to allocate $300k to current overflow gap (Would deplete state permanent overflow funds from $3.7m to $3.4m) -Salt Lake City allocates $300k from remaining Rescue Act to cover remainder of overflow gap. (Would leave $300k remaining from mayor’s original request for council’s discretionary use) City HRC/ Emergency Shelter Zoning -negative planning comm recommendation on text amendment -Internal city meetings on overlay zone concept State Homelessness Mitigation Fund Expansion/ Formula -ULCT facilitating discussions and possible proposal -current proposed formula would provide $3.1M to SLC but, a proposed hard cap would limit SLC portion to $2.75M. -Rep. Eliason running bill this session. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238 PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ___________________________________ Date Received: ________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ___________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 14,2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Budget Amendment #4 - Revised SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director (801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2021-22 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $ 1,772,794.00 $ 4,657,529.00 WATER FUND 0.00 18,118.00 SEWER FUND 0.00 7,941.00 STORM WATER FUND 0.00 2,278.00 AIRPORT FUND 0.00 39,790.00 REFUSE FUND 24,907.00 4,109.00 GOLF FUND 14,310.00 1,802,257.00 FLEET FUND 438,905.00 423,258.00 IMS FUND 161,380.00 135,492.00 MISCELLANEOUS GRANT FUND 17,497,861.48 15,751,215.48 DEBT SERVICE FUND 26,165,000.00 26,165,000.00 CIP FUND 23,400,000.00 23,400,000.00 RISK FUND 212,897.00 212,897.00 TOTAL $ 69,688,054.48 $ 72,619,884.48 Lisa Shaffer (Feb 14, 2022 17:31 MST) BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2021-22 Budget Adjustments Because the fiscal year just started the Fiscal Year 2022 projections are at budget. The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2022. Projections for fiscal year 2021 are coming in better than expected, more detail will be shared as the audit progresses. Given the available information fund balance would be projected as follows: With the current use of fund balance from this budget amendment fund balance drops to 12.86%. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 6,625,050 82,617,126 89,242,176 7,018,483 50,124,619 57,143,102 Budgeted Change in Fund Balance 2,924,682 (7,810,302) (4,885,620) (4,759,137) (19,471,917) (24,231,054) Prior Year Encumbrances (3,733,743) (6,165,453) (9,899,196) - - - Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 5,815,989 68,641,371 74,457,360 2,259,346 30,652,702 32,912,048 Beginning Fund Balance Percent 16.62%23.32%22.61%5.60%9.64%9.18% Year End CAFR Adjustments Revenue Changes - - - - - - Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) - (5,676,583) (5,676,583) 5,759,137 7,652,037 13,411,174 Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 5,815,989 62,964,788 68,780,777 8,018,483 38,304,739 46,323,222 Final Fund Balance Percent 16.62%21.39%20.88%19.87%12.05%12.93% Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#1 Expense Adjustment - - - - 5,138,235 5,138,235 BA#2 Revenue Adjustment - - - - 490,847 490,847 BA#2 Expense Adjustment - (288,488) (288,488) - (986,298) (986,298) BA#3 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#3 Expense Adjustment - (6,239,940) (6,239,940) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (2,000,000) BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - - - 1,772,794 1,772,794 BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - - - (4,657,529) (4,657,529) BA#5 Revenue Adjustment - (242,788) (242,788) - - - BA#5 Expense Adjustment - (2,783,685) (2,783,685) - - - BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#6 Expense Adjustment - (63,673) (63,673) - - - BA#7 Revenue Adjustment - 540,744 540,744 - - - BA#7 Expense Adjustment - (6,582,824) (6,582,824) - - - BA#8 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#8 Expense Adjustment (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (2,000,000) - - - BA#9 Revenue Adjustment - 439,809 439,809 - - - BA#9 Expense Adjustment - 362,532 1,555,532 - - - Change in Revenue 2,202,494 3,018,144 5,220,638 - - - Fund Balance Budgeted Increase - - - - - - - - Adjusted Fund Balance 7,018,483 50,124,619 58,336,102 7,018,483 39,062,788 46,081,271 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 20.05%17.03%17.71%17.39%12.28%12.86% Projected Revenue 35,000,000 294,345,168 329,345,168 40,359,137 317,980,599 358,339,736 2021 Projection 2022 Projection The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $69,688,054.48 of revenue and expense of $72,619,884.48. The amendment proposes changes in thirteen funds, with $2,884,735.00 from the General Fund fund balance. The proposal includes forty-one initiatives for Council review. Including the addition of 22 FTEs in the General Fund supported by grant funding. The revision from February 14th includes funding proposals for homeless services provided through Shelter the Homeless. The transmittal includes three attached documents to provide additional information for the Council. The revision from December 3rd included detail for police spending around the homeless resource centers. A summary spreadsheet document, outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The revision corrects numbering issues in section E of the Detail Document. The budget opening is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ______ of 2021 Fourth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 In June of 2021, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2021. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning 2 July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2021. ________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________ Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed _________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. _________ of 2021. Published: ___________________. Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Senior City Attorney Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs Risk 212,897.00 212,897.00 212,897.00 212,897.00 One-time - 1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs GF 128,888.00 128,888.00 One-time - 1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs Water 18,118.00 18,118.00 One-time - 1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs Sewer 7,941.00 7,941.00 One-time - 1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs Storm Water 2,278.00 2,278.00 One-time - 1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs Airport 39,790.00 39,790.00 One-time - 1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs Refuse 4,109.00 4,109.00 One-time - 1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs Golf 2,257.00 2,257.00 One-time - 1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs Fleet 2,938.00 2,938.00 One-time - 1 Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs IMS 4,492.00 4,492.00 One-time - 2 Department of Air Quality Lawnmower Exchange GF - 250,000.00 - 250,000.00 One-time - 3 COVID Safe Building Improvements GF - 844,000.00 - 844,000.00 One-time - 3 COVID Safe Building Improvements IMS 131,000.00 131,000.00 131,000.00 131,000.00 One-time - 4 Pulled Prior to Submission - - - - 5 Community Health Access Team Vehicles GF - 150,000.00 - 150,000.00 One-time - 5 Community Health Access Team Vehicles Fleet 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 One-time - 6 Non Represented Employee Job Salary Survey GF - 75,000.00 - 75,000.00 One-time - 7 Sugar House SAA GF - 60,000.00 - 60,000.00 One-time - 8 Sorenson Impact Center Social Investment GF - 150,000.00 - - One-time - 9 Pulled Prior to Submission - - - - - 10 Community Health Access Team (CHAT) FTE Transfer GF - - - - Ongoing - 11 Rose Park Golf Course Water & Energy Efficiency Grant (Matching Funds) Golf - 1,800,000.00 - 1,800,000.00 One-time - Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed Section A: New Items 1 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs (Continued) 12 ARPA Funding -Housing & Homelessness - Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park Ranger program (see Item C-1 & E-3 & E-4) GF 1,064,368.00 1,064,368.00 1,064,368.00 1,064,368.00 Ongoing 19.00 12 ARPA Funding -Housing & Homelessness - Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park Ranger program (see Item C-1 & E-3 & E-4) GF 443,676.00 443,676.00 443,676.00 443,676.00 One-time - 12 ARPA Funding -Housing & Homelessness - Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park Ranger program (see Item C-1 & E-3 & E-4) Fleet 195,720.00 195,720.00 195,720.00 195,720.00 One-time - 13 Withdrawn GF - - - - - 1 ARPA Funding -Housing & Homelessness - Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park Ranger program (See Item A-12 & E-3 & E4) Misc Grants 1,064,368.00 1,064,368.00 1,064,368.00 1,064,368.00 Ongoing - 2 ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness - CCP Rapid Intervention Team (See Item A- 13 & E-5) Misc Grants 164,750.00 164,750.00 164,750.00 164,750.00 Ongoing 3.00 Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Administration Proposed Section A: New Items Council Approved 2 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 Economic Development Loan Fund Move Housing - (100,000.00) - - One-time - 1 Economic Development Loan Fund Move Housing 100,000.00 - - One-time - 1 Economic Development Loan Fund Move GF 100,000.00 100,000.00 - - One-time - 2 Increase Grant Fund Misc Grants 1,746,646.00 - 1,746,646.00 - Ongoing - 3 Premium Holiday - Other Funds Refuse 24,907.00 - 24,907.00 - One-time 3 Premium Holiday - Other Funds Golf 14,310.00 - 14,310.00 - One-time 3 Premium Holiday - Other Funds Fleet 18,585.00 - 18,585.00 - One-time 3 Premium Holiday - Other Funds IMS 30,380.00 - 30,380.00 - One-time 4 GPS Housekeeping GF - (74,600.00) - (74,600.00)One-time - 4 GPS Housekeeping GF - 74,600.00 - 74,600.00 One-time - 4 GPS Housekeeping Fleet 74,600.00 74,600.00 74,600.00 74,600.00 One-time - 5 Signage FTE Correction GF - 51,847.00 - 51,847.00 Ongoing - 6 General Obligation Series 2021A Bonds CIP 23,400,000.00 23,400,000.00 23,400,000.00 23,400,000.00 One-time - 6 General Obligation Series 2021A Bonds Debt Service 200,000.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 One-time - 7 Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A Debt Service 10,665,000.00 10,665,000.00 10,665,000.00 10,665,000.00 One-time - 7 Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A Debt Service 10,400,000.00 10,400,000.00 10,400,000.00 10,400,000.00 One-time - 7 Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A Debt Service 4,900,000.00 4,900,000.00 4,900,000.00 4,900,000.00 One-time - 8 Budget Carry Forward GF - 1,175,000.00 - 1,175,000.00 One-time - Section D: Housekeeping Administration Proposed Council Approved 3 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 ARPA Funding - Water and Sewer Infrastructure Projects Misc Grants 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 One-time - 2 ARPA Funding - Housing & Homelessness - Winter Shelter Support - Police Overtime Misc Grants 400,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 One-time - 2 ARPA Funding - Housing & Homelessness - Winter Shelter Support - Shelter the Homeless Funding Misc Grants 301,456.00 301,456.00 One-time - 2 ARPA Funding - Housing & Homelessness - Winter Shelter Support - TBD Misc Grants 298,544.00 298,544.00 One-time - 3 ARPA Funding - Housing & Homelessness - Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park Ranger program (See Item A-12, C-1 & E4) Misc Grants 443,676.00 443,676.00 443,676.00 443,676.00 Ongoing - 4 ARPA Funding - Housing & Homelessness - Public Lands Park Ranger program (See Item A-12, C-1 & E-3) Misc Grants 69,244.00 69,244.00 69,244.00 69,244.00 Ongoing - 5 ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness – CCP Rapid Intervention Team (See Item A-13 & C-2) Misc Grants 160,500.00 160,500.00 160,500.00 160,500.00 One-time - 6 ARPA Funding - Housing & Homelessness - CCP Rapid Intervention Team (Police Support) Misc Grants 1,505,920.00 1,505,920.00 1,505,920.00 1,505,920.00 One-time - 7 Pulled Prior to Submission to allow for the completion of phase 2 of the Social Impact Investment Misc Grants - - - - - 8 ARPA Funding - Housing and Homelessness - HEART Rapid Intervention Team (Advantage Services) Misc Grants 57,000.00 57,000.00 57,000.00 57,000.00 One-time - 9 ARPA Funding – Building the lifeboat with Urban Land Fund Misc Grants 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 One-time - 10 ARPA Funding – Community Grants Misc Grants 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 - - One-time - - Section F: Donations Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Administration Proposed Council Approved 4 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Consent Agenda #2 1 Police Department State Asset Forfeiture Grant Misc Grants 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 One-time - 2 Utah Department of Health - Bureau of Emergency Medical Services (EMS)grant, FY22 Per Capita Allocation Misc Grants 10,250.00 10,250.00 10,250.00 10,250.00 One-time - 3 State of Utah, CCJJ (Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice), Jurisdictions with Halfway Houses and Parole Violator Centers Grant, Law Enforcement Services Account (LESA) Misc Grants 295,571.00 295,571.00 295,571.00 295,571.00 One-time - 4 Utah State Office for Victims of Crime, 2021- 2023 VOCA Victims of Crime Act Grant Misc Grants 364,162.48 364,162.48 364,162.48 364,162.48 One-time - 5 Department of Workforce Services, Housing & Community Development Division, FY22 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant Program Misc Grants 370,735.00 370,735.00 370,735.00 370,735.00 One-time - 6 Utah State Department of Public Safety - 2021 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) Misc Grants 42,500.00 42,500.00 42,500.00 42,500.00 One-time - 7 Cities of Service, Johns Hopkins, Justice for the Jordan Grant, Love Your Block Misc Grants 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 One-time - 8 Utah State Office for Victims of Crime, Violence Against Women Act, Domestic Violence Victim Advocate Misc Grants 101,039.00 101,039.00 101,039.00 101,039.00 One-time - 1 Council Office Reclassifications GF - - - - On-Going Total of Budget Amendment Items 69,523,304.48 72,455,134.48 64,823,304.48 67,605,134.48 22.00 Section I: Council Added Items Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards Administration Proposed Council Approved 5 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund Class, Budget Amendment #4: General Fund GF 1,608,044.00 4,492,779.00 1,508,044.00 4,242,779.00 19.00 Water Fund Water - 18,118.00 - 18,118.00 - Sewer Fund Sewer - 7,941.00 - 7,941.00 - Storm Water Fund Storm Water - 2,278.00 - 2,278.00 - Airport Fund Airport - 39,790.00 - 39,790.00 - Refuse Fund Refuse 24,907.00 4,109.00 24,907.00 4,109.00 - Golf Fund Golf 14,310.00 1,802,257.00 14,310.00 1,802,257.00 - Fleet Fund Fleet 438,905.00 423,258.00 438,905.00 423,258.00 - IMS Fund IMS 161,380.00 135,492.00 161,380.00 135,492.00 - Miscellaneous Grants Fund Misc Grants 17,497,861.48 15,751,215.48 12,897,861.48 11,151,215.48 3.00 Housing Fund Housing - - - - - Debt Service Fund Debt Service 26,165,000.00 26,165,000.00 26,165,000.00 26,165,000.00 - CIP Fund CIP 23,400,000.00 23,400,000.00 23,400,000.00 23,400,000.00 Risk Fund Risk 212,897.00 212,897.00 212,897.00 212,897.00 - - - - Total of Budget Amendment Items 69,523,304.48 72,455,134.48 64,823,304.48 67,605,134.48 22.00 Administration Proposed Council Approved 6 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2021-22 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2021-22 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total ^^ Total Through BA#5 ^^ General Fund (FC 10)367,582,070 (5,138,235.00) 986,298.00 2,000,000.00 4,242,779.00 369,672,912.00 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)2,033,573 2,033,573.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,550,000 1,550,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,699,663 7,098.00 5,706,761.00 Water Fund (FC 51)127,365,555 460,716.00 18,118.00 127,844,389.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)268,213,796 221,826.00 7,941.00 268,443,563.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)19,201,013 19,705.00 2,278.00 19,222,996.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)706,792,500 1,350,949.00 39,790.00 708,183,239.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)24,713,505 36,538.00 4,109.00 24,754,152.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)9,697,417 19,649.00 88,749.00 1,802,257.00 11,608,072.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)4,056,856 4,056,856.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)28,090,576 18,999.00 112,646.00 423,258.00 28,645,479.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)24,302,487 219,193.00 135,492.00 24,657,172.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69)5,307,142 5,307,142.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,341,332 5,341,332.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)18,684,617 10,427,551.76 1,522,743.00 11,151,215.48 41,786,127.24 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)273,797 273,797.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)2,752,565 2,752,565.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)16,121,000 - 16,121,000.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)31,850,423 26,165,000.00 58,015,423.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)29,503,216 (150,753.00) 23,400,000.00 52,752,463.00 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)2,933,913 24,843.00 2,958,756.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)52,939,489 19,705.00 212,897.00 53,172,091.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,755,009,505 7,688,537.76 2,559,683.00 2,000,000.00 67,605,134.48 - 1,834,862,860.24 Budget Manager Analyst, City Council Contingent Appropriation The Council adopted the items highlighted in yellow at the Council meeting on November 16th. 7 Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 1 Section A: New Items A-1: Risk Excess Liability and Cyber Insurance Costs Risk $212,897.00 GF $128,888.00 Water $18,118.00 Sewer $7,941.00 Storm Water $2,278.00 Airport $39,790.00 Refuse $4,109.00 Golf $2,257.00 Fleet $2,938.00 IMS $4,492.00 Department: Attorney - Risk Prepared By: Tamra Turpin For Questions Please Include: Tamra Turpin, Sandee Moore, Katherine Lewis, Aaron Bentley (1) The cost of excess liability insurance increased significantly for FY22 – more than a 65% increase in premium cost over the previous policy period. The bulk of this is driven by recent claim development. Last year’s premium was $267,278. The renewal premium cost is $443,112.54. We had projected a 15% increase and the actual cost is more than we could cover with our allocated budget. The City’s insurance brokers were able to arrange for us to pay the premium in two installments with the second half ($221,556.27) being due by 1/1/2022 to give us time to request a budget amendment. (2) The cost of cyber liability insurance also increased significantly for FY22 -- 320%. Last year’s premium was $45,490. The renewal premium cost is $190,887.60. Although we had projected an increase, the actual cost is far more than we could have anticipated. There are a number of reasons for this; particularly the fact that public agencies are becoming frequent targets, and the number and cost of claim payouts have increased exponentially. After conferring with the City's Chief Information Officer and City Attorney, it was agreed that allowing the City's cyber coverage to lapse would be too risky. The City’s insurance brokers were able to arrange a 45-day extension and then a 90-day premium payment deferral in order to get a budget amendment in place. The cost will be allocated to all funds as shown in the amendment. A-2: Department of Air Quality Lawnmower Exchange GF $250,000.00 Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Gregg Evans For Questions Please Include: Debbie Lyons, Sophia Nicholas, Gregg Evans The Utah Department of Air Quality (UDAQ) administers an annual gas-powered lawnmower and yard equipment exchange in order to reduce criteria pollutants in the areas of the Wasatch Front that are in non-attainment with the Clean Air Act air quality standards. Because the Wasatch Front is on track for attainment of wintertime PM2.5, UDAQ is not running a snowblower exchange this year. Instead, they are focusing on programs to reduce summertime ozone pollution, for which the Wasatch Front is out of attainment. UDAQ has $900,000 set aside to continue the exchanges for the foreseeable future. The size of the lawnmower exchange varies each year depending on the size of financial contributions from partners. Typically, UDAQ contributes between $300,000 and $400,000 per exchange. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 2 The Sustainability Department is proposing a budget amendment of $250,000 General Funds to partner with UDA Q in FY22 on a gas-powered lawnmower exchange. This would facilitate exchanges for approximately 1,000 Salt Lake City residents Salt Lake City participated in 2021, spending nearly $161,000 which helped 582 residents participate. In total, 509 gas - powered mowers were exchanged (the remaining participants bought new mowers without exchanging an old one). This is the equivalent of removing 4.02 tons of pollution from the airshed each year. A majority of residents also opted to participate in our Call 2 Haul program to have their gas mower picked up curbside and recycled by Salt Lake City Waste and Recycling. The Administration proposes continuing this program in FY 22 (spring 2022). The goal will be to increase participation from 582 to 1,000 with a continued focus on our Westside neighborhoods. The Administration anticipates greater awareness and uptake of the program in the comin g year due to increased familiarity with the program, and plans to work with UDAQ on earlier, targeted outreach given the lessons learned from spring 2021. UDAQ anticipates the program logistics will change in FY 22 to facilitate easier participation and lower administrative burden. In particular, they are hoping to develop a phone app that participants will use to sign up and upload any required receipts. UDAQ is also envisioning the next program will offer a promotional discount code to be used towar d the purchase of electric lawn equipment and an app would also help separate Salt Lake City residents from other participating Wasatch Front residents. This will reduce confusion as to who is eligible for curbside pickup of their old mowers. We also hope the app will help us keep the exchange open for longer for Salt Lake City residents instead of opening, closing it, and opening i t again while UDAQ verifies addresses. While the exact amount of the discounts have yet to be determined, the Sustainability D epartment proposes using $250,000 in City General Funds to facilitate approximately 1,000 gas-powered mower exchanges. This budget amendment would also fund temporary staffing expenses to assist with running curbside collection of old mowers through Call 2 Haul. This benefit was very popular last year and helped make this program more equitable to those who might not have the ability to haul their own mower to a metal recycler. A-3: COVID Safe Building Improvements GF $844,000.00 IMS $131,000.00 Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dawn Valente For Questions Please Include: Lorna Vogt, Dawn Valente At the beginning of the year, and in anticipation of the reopening of the City and County Building, the Public Services Department identified a series of critical improvements to minimize the spread of diseases such as COVID -19. Following recommendations from hired consultants (see attached COVID annex) as well as health officials, changes include a multi - level approach to keeping building occupants safe, from controlled access through a check-in desk and appointment management software, to improved indoor air quality. The Department has been informed previously that the following list of items are likely eligible to be covered under ARPA: * Needlepoint Devices. When installed in the air handling system of a building, indoor air quality improves reducing airborne contaminants $250,000 (CCB) * Open and Public Meeting Rooms: Redesign public meeting rooms for spacing and cleaning considerations. This i ncludes replacing chairs for disinfecting purposes. $60,000 * Lobby Appointment management software to be installed at the entrance to the building, allowing for IDing and occupancy control. $5,000 * Entrance furniture. Desk and chairs to be installed at the entrance to the building, creating a check-in area $6,000 * Noticing Board outside of the City & County and Plaza 349 Buildings: Due to State noticing adjustments and the building access being limited, public notices are not addressing the community in the various accessible options (walking public, visitors to the building, etc.). Hybrid meetings and other noticing requirements are required to be completed and are currently being posted on the doors that are frequently accessed. $10,000 * Staffing Entrance. Customer service-oriented staff, under seasonal status, to welcome and direct visitors to the building. $17,000 Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 3 * Enhanced Janitorial. Adjusting the cleaning schedule of all areas of the building from 3 to 5 days a week. (9 months) $165,000 * Cubicle Pieces. To accommodate office reconfigurations. $100,000 * COVID Supplies/PPE. These supplies are being made available throughout buildings, including facemasks, hand sanitizer and disposable gloves. $100,000 * Teleconference and Recording Meeting Equipment. Required to accommodate virtual and hybrid public meetings, and training/orientation including those for Mayor's Board & Commissions, and City Council. $131,000 $844,000 TOTAL A-4: Pulled Prior to Submission A-5: Community Health Access Team Vehicles GF $150,000.00 Fleet $150,000.00 Department: Fire/Public Services Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Karl Lieb, Chris Milne, Clint Rasmussen, Lorna Vogt, Nancy Bean, Dawn Valente Community Health Access Team, CHAT (formerly known as the Community Healthcare Paramedic Team) was initially established in 2013, comprised of one SLCFD paramedic. It quickly grew to include a SLCFD Captain and then another paramedic. The two Paramedics responded as a team to patients that were identified by fire EMS crews as: (1) not meeting the criteria for emergency service, or (2) not benefitting from the scope of training provided to fire department Paramedics and EMTs. The CHAT initiative proposes adding two (2) social workers to increase the team’s scope and the ability of the team to address the overall needs of their patients particularly pertaining to the challenges of mental health and homelessness. Currently, the Community Heath team operates with one vehicle. The addition of two social workers will create the need for two vehicles as two teams will be operating simultaneously. This budget amendment will allow the fire department to replace the current vehicle, a larger inefficient Chevy Tahoe with a fuel-efficient hybrid Ford Explorer. Additionally, a second vehicle of the same kind will be purchased for the additional team. The third purchased fuel -efficient hybrid Ford Explorer will replace an additional Chevy Tahoe in the Medical Division which will be used to support the CHAT initiative immediately and provide for the anticipated rapid expansion of the CHAT program. The three hybrid Ford Explorers will need to be outfitted with graphics, radios, tablets, etc. The $50,000 cost pe r vehicle is the fully loaded cost. Cost of Vehicle 42,500 127,500 Make ready 2,500 7,500 GPS 316 948 Fuel 2,950 8,850 Maintenance 1,734 5,202 TOTAL 50,000 150,000 A-6: Non-Represented Employees' Job Salary Survey GF $75,000.00 Department: Human Resources Prepared By: David Salazar For Questions Please Include: Debra Alexander, David Salazar, John Vuyk This request is intended for consultative services to be provided by a qualified third -party consultant or firm to conduct a compensation survey to assess, evaluate and compare the overall pay structure, including actual base pay and other job elements, of SLC’s non-represented employees to other public and private sector entities with whom the city competes for talent. The recommended survey project includes data collection, analysis, and the development and presentation of a report with recommendations for the City’s Department of Human Resources, Citizens Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC), and elected officials to consider. The survey will be conducted with a primary focus on cash compensation and rely Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 4 on the same caliber and methodology as surveys previously completed for the City's public safety and AFSCME-covered employee groups (as completed by Mercer in early 2019 and 2020, respectively). A-7: Sugar House SAA GF $60,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Ben Kolendar For Questions Please Include: Ben Kolendar The City received a request from the Sugar House Community Council regarding the creation of an economic promotion special assessment area (SAA) for the Sugar House for roughly west/east boundaries of 700 East to 1300 East and north/south of Hollywood Avenue (possibly extending north on 1100 East to Ramona Avenue to include supporters in that area) to I-80. The Department of Economic Development would run the Initial phases of the assessment and present considerations to Council prior to formal action. The funding request will provide consulting services for shape files, tax revenue estimates. The funding will also provide bond counsel for the language in the draft notice of Intent to designate. A-8: Sorenson Impact Center Social Investment GF $150,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Ben Kolendar For Questions Please Include: Ben Kolendar The Administration would like to request $150,000 for the completion of Phase II of the Sorenson Social Impact investment project. A-9: Pulled Prior to Submission A-10: Community Health Access Team (CHAT) Personnel Transfer GF $0.00 Department: Fire Development Prepared By: Clint Rasmussen For Questions Please Include: Karl Lieb, Clint Rasmussen CHAT (formerly known as the Community Healthcare Paramedic Team) was initially established in 2013, comprised of one SLCFD paramedic. It quickly grew to include a SLCFD Captain and then another paramedic. The two Paramedics responded as a team to patients that were identified by fire EMS crews as: (1) not meeting the criteria for emergency service, or (2) not benefitting from the scope of training provided to fire department Paramedics and EMTs. The CHAT initiative proposes transferring two (2) social workers and one (1) case manager (LCSW) from the Police Department to increase the team’s scope and the ability of the team to address the overall needs of their patients particularly pertaining to the challenges of mental health and homelessness. This amendment would transfer three (3) PCNs from the Police Department to the Fire Department and adjust the staffing document. The funding for these positions remains in Non-Departmental. A-11: Rose Park Golf Course Water & Energy Efficiency Grant (Matching Funds) Golf $1,800,000.00 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Bryce Lindeman Dawn Valente For Questions Please Include: Kristen Riker, Bryce Lindeman, Dawn Valente, Laura Briefer The Administration is recommending recognizing $1.8 million in Golf revenue as matching funds for a potential grant. The grant funds and cash match will be used for the installation of water conservation landscape irrigation measures for the Rose Park Golf Course. The existing simple grid irrigation system will be replaced with a head-to-head system with high efficiency nozzles that enable watering to match turf type. Turf removal will reduce square footage of high -water fairway grass types and increase square footage of out of bounds rough areas re -seeded with low water grass types. The project is a shared priority for the City's Department of Public Utilities and Department of Public Lands. Department of Public Utilities is the project lead for the grant application. Any additional match committed at the time of application Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 5 that is over and above $1.8 million requested in this budget amendment will be in the form of the cash value of the dedication of effort by existing full-time position(s) in the Department of Public Utilities and/or Department of Public Lands to the project. A-12: ARPA Funding -Public Safety and Homelessness Outreach - Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park Ranger program (see Item C-1, E-3 & E-4) GF $1,064,368.00 GF $443,676.00 Fleet $195,720.00 Department: Mayor’s Office & Public Lands Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, Kristen Riker, John Vuyk Over the past few years, Public Lands has experienced a dramatic increase of individuals experiencing homelessness using the parks for overnight camping. This vulnerable population also attracts an increase in people who prey upon them and impact other park users with drug use, drug sales, and other crime. Public Lands employees have found themselves in the middle of this extremely complex community crisis, without training or resources to work in this new environment. Public Lands relies on the SLCPD to enforce camping and anti-loitering ordinances, to assist in clearing areas so staff can complete their duties, and to respond to calls for public safety in parks. However, SLCPD has city-wide responsibilities and is not always available for non-urgent park safety needs. SLC Public Lands is proposing a Park Ranger program to maximize public safety, protect park resources, and to provide services and information to park visitors. Park rangers may serve as law enforcement officers, environmental experts, interpreter of cultural and historical points of interest or a combination of the three. This proposal is intended to meet the following program success indicators:  Making people feel welcome and safe in our parks  Deterring inappropriate activity  Gaining voluntary compliance of park codes and rules  Reducing the number of annual vandalism incidents  Reducing annual costs to repair/replace damaged landscape & infrastructure The Mayor is proposing to allocate $5.1 million toward a Public Lands Park Ranger program. Funding for the program will be partially supported through the use of eligible salary restoration dollars. The program will help ensure park safety, including homeless outreach in the parks. The Program will include the addition of nineteen employees in the Public Lands Department. The positions are two Park Ranger Sergeants, sixteen Park Ranger Officers and one support person. The projected annual cost for personnel including uniforms, training and operational costs is $2,350,983. The amendment proposes to add these positions on January 1 at a cost of $1,175,491 for the current fiscal year. The proposed funding will also support one-time costs to implement the program of $401,800, including the purchase of three trucks and two light response vehicles. Funding for personnel and ongoing costs will be transferred to the General Fund while funding for the vehicles will be transferred to Fleet. This funding will be established through a capture of funding for salary restoration from the current fiscal year. A-13: Pulled Prior to Submission Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 6 C-1: ARPA Funding – Public Safety and Homeless Outreach – Public Lands Park Ranger program (See Item A-12, E-3 & E-4) Misc Grants $1,064,368.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk Over the past few years, Public Lands has experienced a dramatic increase of individuals experiencing homelessness using the parks for overnight camping. This vulnerable population also attracts an increase in people who prey upon them and impact other park users with drug use, drug sales, and other crime. Public Lands employees have found themselves in the middle of this extremely complex community crisis, without training or resources to work in this new environment. Public Lands relies on the SLCPD to enforce camping and anti-loitering ordinances, to assist in clearing areas so staff can complete their duties, and to respond to calls for public safety in parks. However, SLCPD has city -wide responsibilities and is not always available for non-urgent park safety needs. SLC Public Lands is proposing a Park Ranger program to maximize public safety, protect park resources, and to provide services and information to park visitors. Park rangers may serve as law enforcement officers, environmental experts, interpreter of cultural and historical points of interest or a combination of the three. This proposal is intended to meet t he following program success indicators:  Making people feel welcome and safe in our parks  Deterring inappropriate activity  Gaining voluntary compliance of park codes and rules  Reducing the number of annual vandalism incidents  Reducing annual costs to repair/replace damaged landscape & infrastructure • The Mayor is proposing to allocate $5.1 million toward a Public Lands Park Range r program. Funding for the program will be partially supported through the use of eligible salary restoration dollars. The program will help ensure park safety, including homeless outreach in the parks. The Program will include the addition of nineteen employees in the Public Lands Department. The positions are two Park Ranger Sergeants, sixteen Park Ranger Officers and one support person. The projected annual cost for personnel including uniforms, training and operational costs is $2,350,983. The amendment proposes to add these positions on January 1 at a cost of $1,175,491 for the current fiscal year. The proposed funding will also support one-time costs to implement the program of $401,800, including the purchase of three trucks and one light response vehicle. Funding for personnel and ongoing costs will be transferred to the General Fund while funding for the vehicles will be transferred to Fleet. This funding will be established through a capture of funding for salary restoration from the current and future fiscal years. C-2: ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness– CCP Rapid Intervention Team (See Item A-13 & E-5) Misc Grants $164,750.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk In September 2020, Mayor Mendenhall launched the Community Commitment Program through the Homeless Engagement and Response Team. The CCP prioritizes outreach to individuals experiencing homelessness while also emphasizing the need to keep public spaces safe, clean, and accessible to all. The first phase of the CCP was a 12-week enhanced neighborhood cleaning program based on neighborhood hot spots reported in CitySourced via the SLC Mobile app. The second phase, which has transitioned into an ongoing partnership with Salt Lake County and over a dozen service providers, focused on intensive encampment outreach of varying lengths of time depending on the size and other characteristics of camps. After approximately 9 months of this sec ond phase, the City and our partners have been in a maintenance stage, during which the City has fewer large encampments but is still attempting to handle the nearly 6,000 CitySourced reports over this past year. This figure is triple the number of complai nts reported in the app in years past. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 7 To more effectively and rapidly address these complaints from residents and businesses, the Mayor is proposing the creation of a Rapid Intervention Team coordinated through HEART. The HEART coordinator (via a positi on that was funded by the Council in the FY23 budget) will ensure that complaints are responded to with the appropriate level of outreach through the SLCPD’s CCC or VOA, SLCPD officers to standby if necessary, as well as a City cleaning team working with Advantage Services. By having a dedicated team to respond, Public Services and Waste & Recycling employees will not be pulled away from their regular duties, as they are currently when the County Health Department requires camp abatement support. The Public Services and Waste and Recycling employees will also be available to respond to illegal dumping complaints throughout the City. The program will add three FTE’s for the Rapid Intervention Team. These employees will be covered in part the first year. Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Economic Development Loan Fund Move Housing -$100,000.00 Housing $100,000.00 GF $100,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jolynn Walz / Randy Hillier For Questions Please Include: Ben Kolendar, Loreno Riffo Jensen, Jolynn Walz, Randy Hillier Under Budget Amendment #7 of FY 2021, $100,000 was appropriated to the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF) within the Housing Fund (FC78) to provide funding for outdoor dining activities and events in the form o f forgivable loans. The purpose of these loans is to assist restaurants and bars recover from the financial effects of the pandemic by offering funding to expand outdoor dining. After further examination of the EDLF guidelines, DED was unable to provide forgivable loans. DED has determined that a traditional grant program is the best way to distribute these funds to businesses and is proposing the $100,000 be moved to a separate account, allowing DED to administer the grant program. D-2: Increase Grant Fund Misc Grants $0.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk The annual budget proposed funding from the American Recovery Plan Act (ARPA) for revenue replacement. During budget adoption, the expense was adjusted based on updated grant guidelines. This increased the expense side of the grant fund, but recognition of the revenue was not included. This request adjusts the revenue side to recognize the revenue side of the transaction in the Grant Fund. This proposal will bring the Fund into balance in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. D-3: Premium Holiday – Other Funds Refuse $0.00 Golf $0.00 Fleet $0.00 IMS $0.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk The Premium Holiday was submitted with the budget with the transfer from the Insurance Fund, but the transfer into other funds was not included. This amendment is to balance the inter-fund transfers. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 8 D-4: GPS Housekeeping GF -$74,600.00 GF $74,600.00 Fleet $74,600.00 Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dawn Valente For Questions Please Include: Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk, Dawn Valente For FY22 there is an accounting change to put the GPS fees for vehicles in the Fleet budget. We missed the piece to move the current budgets over to Fleet. Public Services has a budget of $39,203; Public Lands has a budget of $26,797; and CAN has a budget $8,600 that we need to move to Fleet. D-5: Signage FTE Correction GF $51,847.00 Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dawn Valente For Questions Please Include: Lorna Vogt, Dawn Valente, John Vuyk In the Mayor's Recommended Budget, an FTE for Signage for the Planning & Ecological Services Division was initially approved, but later reduced . However, the funding was again inadvertently reduced at the Council level, thus doubling the reduction. This housekeeping request is to replace the funding that was inadvertently cut from the Signage budget. D-6: General Obligation Series 2021A Bonds CIP $23,400,000.00 Debt Service $200,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Brandon Bagley / Marina Scott For Questions Please Include: Brandon Bagley, Marina Scott, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk In November 2018, voters authorized the issuance of up to $87 million in general obligation bonds to fund street construction. The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021A will be issued in November 2021 as the third issuance of the authorization. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the receipt of bond proceeds and the expenditure budget to pay for construction of the street projects associated with the bonds. It also creates expenditure budget to pay the costs of issuance for the bonds. Bond proceeds will be allocated to five project cost centers in Fund 83 and one cost center in Fund 81 for the costs of issuance associated with the bond. Two cost centers will receive $6,000,000 each for the 200 Sou th Phase 1 & 2 (400 W to 900 E) projects. A third cost center will receive $6,800,000 for the 1100 East (900 S to Warnock Ave) project. The fourth cost center will receive $1,600,000 for the 300 North (300 W to 1000 W) project. The fifth cost center wi ll receive $3,000,000 for local streets. The proceeds to pay the costs of issuance associated with the bonds will be deposited to the debt service cost center in Fund 81. D-7: Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A Debt Service $10,665,000.00 Debt Service $10,400,000.00 Debt Service $4,900,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Brandon Bagley / Marina Scott For Questions Please Include: Brandon Bagley, Marina Scott, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, were issued in June 2012 for the purpose of replacing the North Temple Viaduct and improving North Temple Boulevard. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 9 Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B, were issued in November 2013 for the purpose of financing a portion of the costs of the Sugarhouse Streetcar and paying for the portion of various improvements to create a "greenway" within the corridor. The Series 2012A and 2013B bonds are being refunded with the Sales Tax Refunding Revenu e Bonds, Series 2021A. This budget amendment will create the revenue budget for the receipt of bond proceeds and the expenditure budget to pay off the old bonds and to pay the costs of issuance for the bonds. Two Local Building Authority bonds will also b e refunded by the Series 2021A bonds. This budget amendment creates the budget for the transfer to the LBA to pay those off. A separate budget amendment for the LBA is being submitted to create budget for the payoff of those bonds. D-8: Budget Carry Forward GF $1,175,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk, Teresa Beckstrand In the General Fund there were a number of budgets that did not have encumbrances at the close of fiscal year 2021 the Administration would request Council approval to roll budget for the projects into fiscal year 2022. The budgets requested are listed below: CC CC Name OC OC Description Amount 0900503 Demographer Contract 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $50,000.00 0900925 Financial Risk Assessment 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $100,000.00 0900930 Gentrification Mitigation Study 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $100,000.00 0900705 Washington DC Contract 2324 Special Consultant $75,000.00 0900513 NW Northpoint Plan Airport 2329 Other Professional & Tech Serv $50,000.00 0900508 Home to Transit Program 2590 Other Expenses $800,000.00 TOTAL $1,175,000.00 Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: ARPA Funding – Water and Sewer Infrastructure Projects Misc Grants $2,000,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Laura Briefer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk The Mayor proposes to set aside $2 million for required matching funding as we prepare to apply for State funds for water and sewer infrastructure projects. E-2: ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness –Winter Shelter Support Misc Grants $400,000.00 Misc Grants $301,456.00 Misc Grants $298,544.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk Mayor Mendenhall is proposing that the Council set aside approximately $1 million of the City’s Rescue Plan allocation for emergency shelter needs. Such funds could be used to assist the shelter operator with operations costs or go toward other expenses such as public safety or neighborhood mitigation. Under the revised transmittal the Administration is recommending $400,000 for Public Safety, Police, needs associated with homeless shelters. Two documents outlining the expenses are attached to the revised transmittal as backup information. The revised transmittal from February 14th includes funding proposals for homeless services provided through Shelter the Homeless. The transmittal includes three attached documents to provide additional information for the Council. Laurie Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 10 Hopkins from Shelter the Homeless noted they are comfortable restricting City ARPA funding of $300k to "leasing the non-congregant motel for emergency overflow shelter due to the need for social distancing and smaller rooms to limit COVID transmission amongst those experiencing homelessness." This language will ensure the funding is eligible under ARPA guidelines. E-3: ARPA Funding – Public Safety and Homeless Outreach – Salary Restoration - Public Lands Park Ranger program (See Item A-12, C-1 & E-4) Misc Grants $443,677.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk Over the past few years, Public Lands has experienced a dramatic increase of individuals experiencing homelessness using the parks for overnight camping. This vulnerable population also att racts an increase in people who prey upon them and impact other park users with drug use, drug sales, and other crime. Public Lands employees have found themselves in the middle of this extremely complex community crisis, without training or resources to work in this new environment. Public Lands relies on the SLCPD to enforce camping and anti-loitering ordinances, to assist in clearing areas so staff can complete their duties, and to respond to calls for public safety in parks. However, SLCPD has city -wide responsibilities and is not always available for non-urgent park safety needs. SLC Public Lands is proposing a Park Ranger program to maximize public safety, protect park resources, and to provide services and information to park visitors. Park rangers may serve as law enforcement officers, environmental experts, interpreter of cultural and historical points of interest or a combination of the three. This proposal is intended to meet t he following program success indicators:  Making people feel welcome and safe in our parks  Deterring inappropriate activity  Gaining voluntary compliance of park codes and rules  Reducing the number of annual vandalism incidents  Reducing annual costs to repair/replace damaged landscape & infrastructure The Mayor is proposing to allocate $5.1 million toward a Public Lands Park Ranger program. Funding for the program will be partially supported through the use of eligible salary restoration dollars. The program will help ensure park safety, including homeless outreach in the parks. The Program will include the addition of nineteen employees in the Public Lands Department. The positions are two Park Ranger Sergeants, sixteen Park Ranger Officers and one support person. The projected annual cost for personne l including uniforms, training and operational costs is $2,350,983. The amendment proposes to add these positions on January 1 at a cost of $1,175,491 for the current fiscal year. The proposed funding will also support one-time costs to implement the program of $401,800, including the purchase of three trucks and one light response vehicle. Funding for personnel and ongoing costs will be transferred to the General Fund while funding for the vehicles will be transferred to Fleet. This funding will be established through a capture of funding for salary restoration from the current fiscal year. E-4: ARPA Funding – Public Safety and Homeless Outreach – Public Lands Park Rangers (See Item A12, C-1 & E3) Misc Grants $69,244.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk Over the past few years, Public Lands has experienced a dramatic increase of individuals experiencing homelessness using the parks for overnight camping. This vulnerable population also attracts an increase in people who prey upon them and impact other park users with drug use, drug sales, and other crime. Public Lands employees have found themselves in the middle of this extremely complex community crisis, without training or resources to work in this new environment. Public Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 11 Lands relies on the SLCPD to enforce camping and anti-loitering ordinances, to assist in clearing areas so staff can complete their duties, and to respond to calls for public safety in parks. However, SLCPD has city -wide responsibilities and is not always available for non-urgent park safety needs. SLC Public Lands is proposing a Park Ranger program to maximize public safety, protect park resources, and to provide services and information to park visitors. Park rangers may serve as law enforcement officers, environmental experts, interpreter of cultural and historical points of interest or a combination of the three. This proposal is intended to meet t he following program success indicators:  Making people feel welcome and safe in our parks  Deterring inappropriate activity  Gaining voluntary compliance of park codes and rules  Reducing the number of annual vandalism incidents  Reducing annual costs to repair/replace damaged landscape & infrastructure The Mayor is proposing to allocate $5.1 million toward a Public Lands Park Ranger program. Funding for the program will be partially supported through the use of eligible salary restoration dollars. The program will help ensure park safety, including homeless outreach in the parks. The Program will include the addition of nineteen employees in the Public Lands Department. The positions are two Park Ranger Sergeants, sixteen Park Ranger Officers and one support person. The projected annual cost for personne l including uniforms, training and operational costs is $2,350,983. The amendment proposes to add these positions on January 1 at a cost of $1,175,491 for the current fiscal year. The proposed funding will also support one-time costs to implement the program of $401,800, including the purchase of three trucks and one light response vehicle. Funding for personnel and ongoing costs will be transferred to the General Fund while funding for the vehicles will be transferred to Fleet. This funding will be a direct charge to the ARPA grant.. E-5: ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness – CCP Rapid Intervention Team (See Item A-13 & C-2) Misc Grants $160,500.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk In September 2020, Mayor Mendenhall launched the Community Commitment Program through the Homeless Engagement and Response Team. The CCP prioritizes outreach to individuals experiencing homelessness while also emphasizing the need to keep public spaces safe, clean, and accessible to all. The first phase of the CCP was a 12 -week enhanced neighborhood cleaning program based on neighborhood hot spots reported in CitySourced via the SLC Mobile app. The second phase, which has transitioned into an ongoing partnership with Salt Lake County and over a dozen service providers, focused on intensive encampment outreach of varying lengths of time depending on the size and other characteristics of camps. After approximately 9 mont hs of this second phase, the City and our partners have been in a maintenance stage, during which the City has fewer large encampments but is still attempting to handle the nearly 6,000 CitySourced reports over this past year. This figure is triple the number of complaints reported in the app in years past. To more effectively and rapidly address these complaints from residents and businesses, the Mayor is proposing the creation of a Rapid Intervention Team coordinated through HEART. The HEART coordinator (via a position that was funded by the Council in the FY23 budget) will ensure that complaints are responded to with the appropriate level of outreach through the SLCPD’s CCC or VOA, SLCPD officers to standby if necessary, as well as a City cleaning team working with Advantage Services. By having a dedicated team to respond, Public Services and Waste & Recycling employees will not be pulled away from their regular duties, as they are currently when the County Health Department requires camp abatement support. The Public Services and Waste and Recycling employees will also be available to respond to illegal dumping complaints throughout the City. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 12 The program will add three FTE’s for the Rapid Intervention Team. These employees will be covered in part the f irst year. This funding will be established through a capture of funding for salary restoration from the current fiscal year. E-6: ARPA Funding – Housing & Homelessness – CCP Rapid Intervention Team (Police Support) Misc Grants $1,505,920.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk The Administration is requesting $1,505,920 of funding, to provide funding for Clean Neighborhoods Teams for the Police Department to provide staffing to support the homeless encampment cleanup and camp re -establishment stabilization as requested by the Salt Lake County Health Department. Police of ficers working extra overtime shifts will provide security to ensure the cleanups can proceed in an environment that will be safe for all involved. Staffing numbers will vary depending on the size, number of cleanups and the location. Activity # days Officers # hours Rate Amount Requested Major Cleanups 14 40 10 $65 $364,000 Minor Cleanups* 122 24 6 $65 $1,141,920 And area stabilization Total Requested $1,505,920 *previously utilized on-duty resources that are no longer available E-7: Pulled Prior to Submission to allow for the completion of phase 2 of the Social Impact Investment E-8: ARPA Funding – CCP HEART Rapid Intervention Team Misc Grants $57,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk, Michelle Hoon To more effectively and rapidly address these complaints from residents and businesses, the Mayor is proposing the creation of a Rapid Intervention Team coordinated through HEART. The HEART coordinator (via a position that was funded by the Council in the FY23 budget) will ensure that complaints are responded to with the appropriate level of outreach through the SLCPD’s CCC or VOA, SLCPD officers to standby if necessary, as well as a City cleaning team working with Advantage Services. By having a dedicated team to respond, Public Services and Waste & Recycling employees will not be pulled away from their regular duties, as they are currently when the County Health Department requires camp abatement support. The Public Services and Waste and Recycling employe es will also be available to respond to illegal dumping complaints throughout the City. Work will be coordinated with Advantage Services. The program will be monitored for the first six months to evaluate the effectiveness of the service. E-9: ARPA Funding – Westside Community Initiative Misc Grants $4,000,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Ben Kolendar, Danny Walz, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk As a function of utilizing the tax differential collected by the Inland Port Authority and allocated to the RDA for affordabl e housing, the RDA Board has endorsed the creation of an Urban Land Fund in order to develop and secure perpetual housing affordability on the City’s west side. Under the direction of the RDA, the fund would look to maximize opportunities for affordability in both rental housing and home ownership as well as limited commercial uses Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 13 within mixed use developments. RDA staff is currently working on potential options for the structure of the land fund. This process includes the evaluation of opportunities for community wealth building and cooperative housing models within a perpetual housing fund. The allocation of this funding source is i ntended to offset the impacts on the west side from the Inland Port development. The opportunity of this program is to strengthen the community by providing a mechanism to help reverse the historical impacts of disinvestment and inequality on the residents in this area of the City. Mayor Mendenhall proposes the allocation of $4 million in seed funds for implementing the policy proposals that emerge from the current study, including the following goals:  Develop Land with a Long-Term Approach to Continuously Serve a Community-Defined Purpose WCI will take a long-term approach to land development and community building so that the RDA may retain the fee ownership to and a reversionary interest in the property. By ground leasing to development partners, the RD A will provide an opportunity to receive revenue generation to serve other public benefits.  Create Opportunities for Revenue Generation while Balancing the Implementation of Public Benefits WCI will strive to balance the development of property with the in corporation of public benefits. Benefits such as affordable housing and below-market commercial space which generate limited or no cash flow would potentially be subsidized with land uses that generate positive cash flow. Revenue generated by projects and received by the RDA will then be reinvested back into the WCI with the goal of furthering shared prosperity.  Assist the Westside in Mitigating Gentrification and Displacement WCI will acquire land with the goal of holding it for the community in perpetuity, thereby removing land from the speculative market so that it serves low and moderate-income residents in perpetuity. Housing will remain affordable even as neighborhood change occurs and gentrification pressures mount, which protects families f rom displacement.  Give Lower Income Households the Opportunity to Build Wealth Through Ownership WCI will create opportunities for families to buy homes at affordable prices by focusing on a shared -equity model. A shared equity model offers an alternative form of ownership that provides benefits traditional markets cannot, such as long-term housing affordability and the ability for low and moderate -income families to build equity. When families decide to sell, they will receive their portion of the appreciation but the RDA remains as the land owner and is in the position to continue to sell the home at a below-market price, making it affordable to another family of limited means. Keeping the home affordable, from family to family, will benefit future generations by acting as a steppingstone for low-income families to go from renting to building wealth.  Engage Community Members in Development Decisions The RDA will involve the community in the planning and goals regarding long term land use and housing development. This can translate into residents actively involved in creating positive change within their communities and projects that reflect the value of its residents. The result will be projects that incorporate a shared mission and vision with the community.  Leverage Resources for Other Neighborhood Development Purposes Revenues acquired through ground leases or partnerships could contribute to other purposes, including subsidizing deeply affordable housing, below-market commercial space, infrastructure, public art, etc.  Collaborate with Other Partners to Broaden the Pool of Funding and Expertise The RDA would actively work to acquire outside funding sources and professional resources by bringing together financial institutions, the private sector, nonprofits, public officials, other government agencies, researchers, and practitioners to collaborate on community and economic development activities.  Carry Out Efforts with a “Collective Impact” Approach The RDA will continuously evaluate how projects work together to address common goals through a “collective impact” approach that produces measurable results. These measurable results will be tracked and reported on to promote data-driven and outcome-based decisions. E-10: ARPA Funding – Community Grants Misc Grants $4,000,000.00 Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 14 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Ben Kolendar, Blake Thomas, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk Community grants Mayor Mendenhall proposes an allocation of $ 4 million toward community grants. These grants will give community organizations and local businesses the opportunity to propose to the City what COVID -related problems they are trying to solve City staff and volunteers from relevant City boards and commissions would select grantees at the conclusion of an open solicitation process. The Administration proposes to split these grant funds into two categories, with half of the allocation going to Economic Development and half to Community and Neighborhoods. These departments will scope the challenge facing residents and businesses, and launch two solicitations seeking proposals on the COVID -related problem that the applicant desires to address under the following broad categories: o CAN grants -- Nonprofit support (to be further refined by CAN): This could include programs like retraining of displaced workers, nonprofit legal services for eviction assistance, expanded educational opportunities, resources to mitigate the digital divide, access to healthcare for underserved populations, mental health assistance, etc. o DED grants -- Business assistance (to be further refined by DED): This could include grants for businesses not included in other government programs during the pandemic, especially small and local businesses, and support for artist/artisan businesses. Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda #2 G-1: Police Department Asset Forfeiture Grant Misc. Grants $1,500.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Jordan Smith, Shellie Dietrich The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for and received a $1,500 grant award from the State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), under the State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) program. The SAFG program funds crime prevention and law enforcement activities within specific guidelines. CCJJ developed the SAFG program as a means of evaluating and distributing state forfeiture funds. The funds will be used for confidential informant funds to enhance investigations in narcotics-related cases. A public hearing was held 9/7/21 for this grant application. G-2: Utah Department of Health - Bureau of Emergency Medical Services (EMS)grant, FY22 Per Capita Allocation Misc. Grants $10,250.00 Department: Emergency Management Prepared By: Brittany Blair/ Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Clint Rasmussen, Brittany Blair The Fire Department applied for and was awarded $10,250 of grant funding from the Utah Department of Health, Bureau of Emergency Medical Services. This funding will be used towards the purchase of a 12 -Lead Cardiac Monitor and medical supplies relating to the provision of Emergency Medical Services as funding permits. A Public Hearing was held on 2/16/21 for the grant applications on this award. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 15 G-3: State of Utah, CCJJ (Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice), Jurisdictions with Halfway Houses and Parole Violator Centers Grant, Law Enforcement Services Account (LESA) Misc. Grants $295,571.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Clint Rasmussen, Brittany Blair The Police Department has applied for and been awarded a $295,570 grant from the State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice, in support of the Jurisdictions with Halfway Houses and Parole Violator Centers grant. This grant provides funding for law enforcement agencies that provide services directly to areas with halfway houses or parole violator centers, or both. The Police Department will use these funds for law enforcement overtime related to reducing criminal activity including targeted enforcement operations, increased patrol response, and re sponding to mental health calls for service. The Department will also utilize funds for case transcription services, six overt camera units and maintenance/repairs/supplies for units in the Department's camera program. A public hearing was held 9/7/21 for this grant application. G-4: Utah State Office for Victims of Crime, 2021-2023 VOCA Victims of Crime Act Grant Misc. Grants $364,162.48 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Wendy Isom/ Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Wendy Isom, Jordan Smith, Shellie Dietrich The Police Department applied for and received a $364,162.48 grant from the State of Utah, Office for Victims of Crime under the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) program, to be used for the continuation of the Victim Advocate Program. These funds will be used to pay for salary and fringe for 4 existing full-time Victim Advocate positions and all of the part-time Victim Advocate positions. This grant also covers the costs for Rita, the program's facility dog. Additiona lly, there are supplies for the program, emergency funds for assisting victims, and training for Advocate staff. No match is required by the funding agency. VOCA funds cover local and national conferences and trainings needed to meet statutory training re quirements for the Victim Advocates. It also provides and emergency fund that can be used when no other victim funding options are available - these funds can be used for food, clothing, shelter, transportation and 911 phones for victims of violent crime. Additionally, it provides for supplies such as Victim Advocate brochures, Traumatic Death Handbooks, cell phone costs, etc. A $109,938.89 match is required which will be satisfied by the salary and benefits of City funded Victim Advocates and the Program Coordinator. In-kind matching funds are provided by the student interns/volunteers that participate in the Victim Advocate Program. A Public Hearing was held 9/7/21 on this grant application. G-5: Department of Workforce Services, Housing & Community Development Division, FY22 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant Program Misc. Grants $370,735.00 Department: Community and Neighborhoods Prepared By: Michelle Hoon / Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Michelle Hoon, Brent Beck The Community and Neighborhoods Dept. applied for and received State Department of Workforce Services funding of $370,735 to continue efforts to encourage businesses, residents, Homeless Resource Center (HRC) operators and guests to participate in constructive community engagement opportunities and encourage service-based interventions in order to successfully integrate the HRCs into the fabric of their host neighborhoods and ensure the safety of those neighborhoods. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 16 The SLC Mitigation team currently consists of a SLC Community Engagement Coordinator, VOA Business and Community Liaison, and VOA Outreach Case Manager. This application requests to continue the current team and expand the team to include an additional VOA Business and Community Liaison, additional VOA Outreach Case Manager, and a VOA Outreach Peer Support Specialist, and three new positions as part of the City's existing Downtown Ambassador program - tailored to the areas surrounding the HRCs (King, Miller, and Youth). A Public Hearing will be scheduled for the application on this grant. G-6: Utah State Department of Public Safety - 2021 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) Misc. Grants $42,500.00 Department: Emergency Management Services Prepared By: Audrey Pierce / Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Audrey Pierce, Clint Rasmussen The Emergency Management Services Division received a $42,500 FY2021 EMPG grant from the State of Utah, Department of Public Safety. This grant is awarded on an annual basis to jurisdictions to help offset costs of planning and updating emergency preparedness plans, conduct emergency preparedness exercises and produce materials and other media for public educational outreach and training pertaining to emergency preparedn ess. SLC's population increases from 180,000 to an estimated 310,000 each workday. Should a disaster occur during the workday, employees become a part of the SLC emergency response, but are not trained to assist themselves or others. These funds will offset costs in providing National Incident Management System (NIMS) training to SLC staff with emergency response responsibilities during a disaster or other significant event. The funds will be used to fund community preparedness activities, purchase training materials, supplies and equipment including books, brochures, handouts, etc. The grant requires a 50% match which will be satisfied with the Community Preparedness Coordinator's time and budgeted for within Emergency Managements general fund. A public hearing will be held for this grant application. G-7: Cities of Service, Johns Hopkins, Justice for the Jordan Grant, Love Your Block Misc. Grants $100,000.00 Department: Office of the Mayor Prepared By: Hailey Leek / Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Hailey Leek The office of the Mayor applied for and received $100,000 in grant funding for the Justice for the Jordan, Love your Block grant. The grant provides: 1. $60,000 to hire a Love your Block Fellow for 2 years. 2. $40,000 to distribute to the community as mini grants 3. The City is also required to engage 2 AmeriCorps VISTA volunteers, one each year of the grant. 4. The City also receives technical assistance from Cities of Service The Cities of Service Love Your Block program connects mayor’s offices with community residents to revitalize their neighborhoods one block at a time. Typically, cities implementing Love Your Block invite community groups to identify priority projects and award mini-grants to support volunteer-fueled solutions that the community can implement. The City identifies a problem and then engages with volunteers within the neighborhoods of focus and engages them early in the project design phase as well as implementation and evaluation. The City i dentified the neighborhoods adjacent to the Jordan River in Glendale (census tract 1026, 1027.01, & 1028.01) as the target area. A public hearing will be held for this grant application. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #4 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 17 G-8: Utah State Office for Victims of Crime, Violence Against Women Act, Domestic Violence Victim Advocate Misc. Grants $101,039.00 Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Scott Fisher / Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Katherine Lewis, Scott Fisher The City Prosecutors office applied for and received a $101,039 grant from the State of Utah, Office for Victims of Crime under the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) program, to be used for the Violence Against Women’s Act to fund Salt Lake City Prosecutor Domestic Violence Victim Advocate. The Prosecutor’s Office is requesting a Victim Advocate to assist and support victims of domestic violence as their cases move to the prosecution and adjudication phases. The services include information, education and advocacy through the case and prosecution, assistance with victim impact statements, support and accompaniment to court and meetings with investigators and prosecutors. The Victim Advocate assist in post release safety planning, preparation for court appearances, and jail release agreements. Until this year, Salt Lake County District Attorney Victim Services has provided this support for victims whose cases are adjudicate in Salt Lake City Justice Court. Funding cutbacks required the county to reassign the advocates to County prosecutions. Salt Lake City is applying for this new city position to fill the gap in services. The match is $12,630 each fiscal year, for a total of $25,260 for the two-year performance period of the grant. The match is met with cash available in the Office of the Attorney’s budget. A Public Hearing was held 6/15/21 on this grant application Section I: Council Added Items Impact Fees ‐ Summary Confidential Data pulled 10/29/2021 Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area Area Cost Center UnAllocated Cash Notes: Impact fee - Police 8484001 415,503$ A Impact fee - Fire 8484002 1,487,183$ B Impact fee - Parks 8484003 8,948,216$ C Impact fee - Streets 8484005 6,101,644$ D 16,952,545$ Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month 202007 (Jul2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202008 (Aug2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202009 (Sep2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202010 (Oct2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202011 (Nov2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202012 (Dec2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202101 (Jan2021)2021Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202102 (Feb2021)2021Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202103 (Mar2021)2021Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202104 (Apr2021)2021Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202105 (May2021)2021Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202106 (Jun2021)2021Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202107 (Jul2021)2022Q1 (0)$ -$ -$ -$ (0)$ 202108 (Aug2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202109 (Sep2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Current Month 202110 (Oct2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202111 (Nov2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202112 (Dec2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202201 (Jan2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202202 (Feb2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202203 (Mar2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202204 (Apr2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202205 (May2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202206 (Jun2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202207 (Jul2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202208 (Aug2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202209 (Sep2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202210 (Oct2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202211 (Nov2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202212 (Dec2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202301 (Jan2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202302 (Feb2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202303 (Mar2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202304 (Apr2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202305 (May2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202306 (Jun2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total, Currently Expiring through June 2021 0$ -$ -$ -$ 0$ FY 2023Calendar Month Fiscal Year 2021FY 2022Fiscal Quarter E = A + B + C + D Police Fire Parks Streets Total Impact Fees Confidential Data pulled 10/29/2021 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Police Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Police Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Police Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Police Allocation Remaining Appropriation Public Safety Building Replcmn 8405005 14,068$ 14,068$ -$ 0$ Police Impact Fee Refunds 8421102 338,448$ -$ 60,722$ 277,727$ Sugarhouse Police Precinct 8417016 10,331$ 10,331$ -$ -$ Police Refunds 8418013 -$ -$ (3,588)$ 3,588$ PolicePrecinctLandAquisition 8419011 239,836$ 239,836$ -$ -$ Eastside Precint 8419201 21,639$ 21,639$ -$ -$ Police'sConsultant'sContract 8419205 3,565$ -$ 3,565$ -$ ReimbExcessPoliceCapacity IF 8422800 1,898,497$ -$ 1,898,497$ -$ A Grand Total 2,526,385$ 285,875$ 1,959,195$ 281,315$ Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Study for Fire House #3 8413001 15,700$ -$ -$ 15,700$ Fire Station #3 8415002 1,568$ -$ -$ 1,568$ Fire Station #3 8416009 565$ 96$ -$ 469$ Fire Station #14 8415001 6,083$ 6,083$ -$ -$ Fire Station #14 8416006 44,612$ -$ -$ 44,612$ Fire refunds 8416007 82,831$ -$ -$ 82,831$ Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 4,941$ 3,021$ 1,862$ 58$ FY20 FireTrainingFac. 8420431 56,031$ -$ -$ 56,031$ B Grand Total 212,331$ 9,200$ 1,862$ 201,268$ Parks Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values 9line park 8416005 21,958$ 19,702$ -$ 2,256$ Park refunds 8416008 11,796$ -$ -$ 11,796$ Parks and Public Lands Compreh 8417008 7,500$ -$ -$ 7,500$ Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,094,430$ 9,402$ 24,821$ 1,060,208$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,110$ -$ -$ 1,110$ C Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 23,530$ 23,000$ -$ 530$ Fairmont Park Lighting Impr 8418004 49,752$ 6,000$ 37,597$ 6,155$ Bridge to Backman 8418005 290,276$ 10,285$ 4,515$ 275,475$ ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 10,830$ -$ -$ 10,830$ Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 4,857$ 2,596$ 2,219$ 42$ Fisher Carriage House 8420130 1,098,764$ 1,038,968$ 59,796$ -$ Warm Springs Off Leash 8420132 20,411$ -$ 20,411$ -$ Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 431,000$ -$ -$ 431,000$ 9Line Orchard 8420136 195,045$ 32,650$ -$ 162,395$ Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 12,795$ 4,328$ -$ 8,467$ JR Boat Ram 8420144 15,561$ 6,378$ -$ 9,183$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 489,688$ 64,333$ -$ 425,355$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,343,904$ 169,077$ 59,946$ 3,114,882$ UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 135,084$ 21,169$ 1,355$ 112,560$ Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 388,477$ 92,174$ 30,958$ 265,346$ Cnty #2 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420426 88$ -$ 88$ -$ FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 722,920$ 571,809$ 3,343$ 147,769$ IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 58,014$ 1,905$ -$ 56,109$ Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 523,889$ 287,290$ 8,852$ 227,746$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 224,247$ 173,467$ 34,134$ 16,646$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 275,000$ -$ -$ 275,000$ Parks Impact Fee Refunds 8418015 101,381$ -$ -$ 101,381$ Three Creeks West Bank NewPark 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$ GlendaleWtrprk MstrPln&Rehab 8422406 3,200,000$ -$ -$ 3,200,000$ Green loop 200 E Design 8422408 610,000$ -$ -$ 610,000$ Historic Renovation AllenParK 8422410 420,000$ -$ -$ 420,000$ SLCFoothillsTrailheadDevelpmnt 8422412 1,304,682$ -$ -$ 1,304,682$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 425,000$ -$ -$ 425,000$ Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 510,000$ -$ -$ 510,000$ RAC Playground with ShadeSails 8422415 180,032$ -$ -$ 180,032$ Grand Total 16,694,447$ 2,534,534$ 288,033$ 13,871,881$ Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Gladiola Street 8406001 16,109$ 13,865$ -$ 2,244$ 500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 32,718$ 16,691$ 16,027$ -$ Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ 700 South Reconstruction 8415004 2,449$ -$ 2,449$ -$ 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$ Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 1,444$ -$ -$ 1,444$ 500 to 700 S 8418016 96,637$ 22,744$ 73,893$ -$ 9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 152,500$ 139,280$ 13,220$ -$ D Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 200,000$ -$ 12,484$ 187,516$ Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 35,392$ -$ -$ 35,392$ Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 95,653$ 44,088$ 50,864$ 700$ Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ 13,000$ -$ -$ Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8419008 221,688$ 10,244$ 7,033$ 204,411$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8420105 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 875,000$ -$ -$ 875,000$ Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 58,780$ 20,697$ -$ 38,083$ Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 2,250,220$ 290,460$ 1,216,451$ 743,309$ TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 302,053$ -$ -$ 302,053$ IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$ 200S TransitCmpltStrtSuppl IF 8422602 37,422$ -$ -$ 37,422$ 900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 28,000$ -$ -$ 28,000$ Local Link Construction IF 8422606 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 25,398$ -$ -$ 25,398$ 400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 90,000$ -$ -$ 90,000$ Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ 900 S Signal Improvements IF 8422615 70,000$ -$ -$ 70,000$ Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Transportatn Safety Imprvmt IF 8422620 44,400$ -$ -$ 44,400$ 1700S Corridor Transfrmtn IF 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$ Grand Total 5,967,404$ 888,511$ 1,392,421$ 3,686,472$ Total 25,400,567$ 3,718,120$ 3,641,511$ 18,040,936$ E = A + B + C + D TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE 8,948,216$ 6,101,644$ 16,952,545$ 8484002 8484003 8484005 415,503$ $1,487,183 8484001 UnAllocated Budget Amount ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 February 8, 2022 Dear City Council Chair Dugan, This letter is to follow up on the City Council discussions from December 2021, within Budget amendment #4, regarding Mayor Mendenhall’s request of $1 million in American Rescue Act funding be allocated to emergency homeless overflow, located at North Temple and Redwood Road, this winter. Subsequently, the City Council allocated $400,000 of those funds to pay for overtime police officers shifts for safety and security needs in that neighborhood. Shelter the Homeless requested, from the city, the remaining $600,000 to cover most of their current operations funding gap (they report the total gap is: $602,912). The City Council did not allocate those funds at that time but held them for further evaluation and discussion. The administration has worked with The State Office of Homelessness regarding their funding options for overflow operations. State office staff have recommended that the State Homelessness Council fund $301,456 from their state funds to cover a portion of the needed operations funds. The administration requests that the City Council appropriate $301,456 from remaining American Rescue Act funds to match the state funds to fulfill the overflow operations request. This would leave just under $300,000 remaining from the Rescue Act funds for use by the City Council at their discretion. We have included a diagram of current city-related homelessness system issues and needs, as well as an emergency homeless overflow budget from Shelter the Homeless for your review. Thank you for your consideration. ANDREW JOHNSTON Director of Homeless Policy & Outreach BUDGET ANALYSIS for 2021/2022 High Needs Temp Housing Program/Winter Overflow High Needs Temp Housing Program Funding Salt Lake County Funding 779,988.00 State of Utah Funding 787,393.00 1,567,381.00$ High Needs Law Enforcement Plan Funding Salt Lake County Funding 400,000.00 Salt Lake City Funding 416,000.00 816,000.00$ Total Current Funding 2,383,381.00$ Lease and Security Expenses - STH Lease Costs 1,105,912.50 Security 189,000.00 Meals 35,700.00 Transportation 35,000.00 Staffing and administration 117,775.50 1,483,388.00$ Operational and Services Expenses - TRH Staffing and administration - case mgmt, ops staff 479,808 Supplies, cleaning, insurance, communications 207,097 686,905.00$ High Needs Law Enforcement Plan Costs 816,000.00$ Total Projected Expenses 2,986,293.00$ Funding for each organization STH Funding committed 880,476.00 TRH Funding committed 686,905.00 SLC Police Funding committed 816,000.00 2,383,381.00$ STH Funding Gap (602,912.00)$ Funding by Type Total SLCo Funding 1,179,988.00 Total State Funding 787,393.00 Total SLC Funding (up to $1M to be allocated)416,000.00 Total Overflow Allocation 2,383,381.00$ Funding Gap (602,912.00)$ Homelessness Related Issues Diagram February 8, 2022 Permanent High Needs Hotel/ Emergency Overflow -StH ongoing search for location somewhere in the county -City/County/State discussion about how to make it happen -Pending request of county council for $6m acquisition funding (March ’22) High Needs Motel/ Overflow Funding Gap- $603k -State Homelessness Council mtg Thurs Feb 10th. State proposal to allocate $300k to current overflow gap (Would deplete state permanent overflow funds from $3.7m to $3.4m) -Salt Lake City allocates $300k from remaining Rescue Act to cover remainder of overflow gap. (Would leave $300k remaining from mayor’s original request for council’s discretionary use) City HRC/ Emergency Shelter Zoning -negative planning comm recommendation on text amendment -Internal city meetings on overlay zone concept State Homelessness Mitigation Fund Expansion/ Formula -ULCT facilitating discussions and possible proposal -current proposed formula would provide $3.1M to SLC but, a proposed hard cap would limit SLC portion to $2.75M. -Rep. Eliason running bill this session. 1 Weisberg, Brent From:Brown, Mike Sent:Wednesday, December 1, 2021 03:56 PM To:'rruso@ch.utah.gov'; 'j.eining@draper.ut.us'; Troy D. Carr; 'cburnett@murray.utah.gov'; 'dhutson@rivertonpd.org'; 'gseverso@sandy.ut.gov'; 'Jeff Carr'; 'dcarruth@southsaltlakecity.com'; 'btcottam@taylorsvilleut.gov'; 'fross@rideuta.com'; Ken Wallentine; 'colleen.jacobs@wvc-ut.gov'; Sheriff Rosie Rivera; 'dcarruth@sslc.com'; 'ken.wallentine@westjordan.utah.gov' Cc:Brown, Mike; VanDongen, Lance; Zayas, Yvette; Weisberg, Brent; Ewell, Lamar; Purvis, Brian Subject:Winter Shelter Outside Agencies Chiefs and Sheriff: As you may know, after many months of effort to find a location for a temporary winter emergency homeless shelter, the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness has requested the use of a motel within Salt Lake City for winter overflow shelter. The intent of this facility is to allow access to indoor beds through this winter to adults in the county experiencing homelessness. Salt Lake City has agreed to allow this use. However, the city needs support to ensure the safety and security of those accessing shelter, as well as for the surrounding neighborhood. I understand that all of our departments are experiencing staffing shortages. SLCPD is not immune to this reality as well. Hosting this county-wide service requires all of us to share some level of responsibility for its support to allow all to benefit from the services. Below is a proposed plan and a request of each of you, as our partner agencies, to assist in making this winter service available as soon as possible.  SLCPD will contribute four officers and a supervisor. The city would be responsible for coordinating the schedule.  Our ask is that at least three other agencies, or a combination of agencies, contribute four officers (on overtime) to fill the four, five-hour shifts each day.  The hourly rate is $80 with $15 going back to the agency for vehicle, fuel, and maintenance reimbursement.  The remaining $65 is paid in overtime to the officer.  Shifts will be scheduled starting as soon as the program can open in December and will last until the end of the winter program in April. As this is both a county and state involved program, Unified PD and the State Department of Public Safety have been contacted and invited to provide support as well. Please review this draft and let me know how your department will be able to contribute to this multi- jurisdictional approach. I will be reaching out to all of you by phone in the very near future to have additional conversations. 2 Thank you, Mike MIKE BROWN Chief of Police Salt Lake City Police Department 801.799.3801 | mike.brown@slcgov.com www.slcpd.com | @slcpdPAGE 1 UTAH EMERGENCY WINTER HOUSING SHELTER dATE RANGE FOR OPERATION: DECEMBER 15, 2021 - APRIL 15, 2022 (120 d AYS) www.slcpd.com | @slcpd LAW ENFORCEMENT BUDGET AND STAFFING 4 OFFICERS A DAY 5 HOUR SHIFTS $80 AN HOUR $15 goes to the agency as a vehicle, fuel, maintenance reimbursement. $65 goes to the officer as overtime pay. = $1600 DAILY RATE X 120 DAYS (Estimated shelter operating period.) = $192,000 SHIFT 1 SHIFT 3 SHIFT 4 SHIFT 2 AGENCY AGENCY AGENCY SLCPD A B C SLCPD WILL PROVIDE 1 SUPERVISOR PER DAY SUPERVISOR 5 HOUR SHIFTS = $400 DAILY RATE X 120 DAYS = $48,000 THE TOTAL OVERTIME COST FOR THE SAFETY PLAN IS $816,000. FUNDING SOURCES FOR PARTICIPATING AGENCIES ARE STILL BEING IDENTIFIED AT THIS TIME AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT A LATER DATE. FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 TOTAL Taking Care of the City: Revenue Loss (Based on Calendar Year Calculations)11,432,646$ 34,372,399$ -$ 45,805,045$ 1 Salary: Bonus 1,193,000$ 1,193,000$ Salary: Police Retention and Recruitment 7,798,233$ 7,798,233$ Council Adopted ARP Allocation - Special Projects Assistant for Community Commitment Program (CAN)93,829$ 93,829$ - Youth & Family Community and Program Manager (from BA#2) (CAN)90,633$ 90,633$ - Youth & Family COVID Programming Continuation (CAN)711,350$ 711,350$ - Economic Development Strategic Plan (Economic Development)50,000$ 50,000$ - Economic Development Staff (Economic Development)290,000$ 290,000$ - Grant Administrator (Finance)101,020$ 101,020$ - Grant Manager (Finance)95,000$ 95,000$ - Apprenticeship Program (All Departments)1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ - MRT Expansion [6 Months] (Fire)136,762$ 136,762$ - MRT Expansion [One-Time $46,700] (Fire)46,700$ 46,700$ Water and Sewer Infrastructure 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ Council Added BA2 - Annex Building Renovation for Odyssey House 500,000$ 500,000$ Homelessness and Public Safety: the City's Greatest Current Need Clean Neighborhoods teams 1,505,920$ 1,505,920$ Public Lands Park Rangers (from Salary Restoration)1,508,044$ 1,545,746$ 792,195$ 3,845,985$ 2 Public Lands Park Rangers (One-time directly from ARPA funding)69,247$ CCP clean-up 325,250$ 329,500$ 164,750$ 819,500$ HEART 57,000$ 290,000$ 290,000$ 637,000$ Advantage Services Contract -$ Emergency Shelter Set Aside 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ Building Community Resilience Social Impact Investment 10,000,000$ 10,000,000$ 3 Urban Land Fund 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ Community Grants Community Grants 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ TOTAL 1,193,000$ 36,811,634$ 46,537,645$ 1,246,945$ 85,719,977$ Amount of Distibution 85,411,572$ Salt Lake City ARPA Budgeted Funding FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 TOTAL Salt Lake City ARPA Budgeted Funding Items listed in Blue are new proposals. 1 Projected Amount. This funding is not allocated to projects, creates flexible spending dollars. Revenue Loss Dollars can potentially cover all or a portion of these expenses in FY2023 and FY2024 Police Retention and Recruitment (Salary Enhancements)7,993,189$ 4,096,509$ 12,089,698$ Special Projects Assistant for Community Commitment Program (CAN)96,175$ 49,290$ 145,464$ Youth & Family Community and Program Manager (from BA#2) (CAN)92,899$ 47,611$ 140,509$ Youth & Family COVID Programming Continuation (CAN)729,134$ 373,681$ 1,102,815$ Economic Development Strategic Plan (Economic Development)51,250$ 26,266$ 77,516$ Economic Development Staff (Economic Development)297,250$ 152,341$ 449,591$ Grant Administrator (Finance)103,546$ 53,067$ 156,613$ Grant Manager (Finance)97,375$ 49,905$ 147,280$ Apprenticeship Program (All Departments)1,025,000$ 525,313$ 1,550,313$ MRT Expansion [6 Months] (Fire)140,181$ 71,843$ 212,024$ Park Ranger Program 805,237$ 383,297$ 1,188,534$ Fiscal Year 2022 One-Time Revenues ARPA Revenue Loss 11,432,646$ 11,432,646$ One Time Use of General Fund Balance 15,335,334$ 15,335,334$ One Time Use of General Fund Balance (FOF)2,129,483$ 2,129,483$ 46,157,818$ 2 Park Ranger Program Annual Costs 1,175,491$ 2,350,983$ 1,175,492$ One-Time Costs 401,800$ TOTAL 1,577,291$ 2,350,983$ 1,175,492$ Available Salary Restoration Funding 1,508,044$ 1,545,746$ 792,195$ Difference (Another Funding Source is needed, possibly revenue loss)(805,237)$ (383,297)$ 3 Social Impact Investment Focus will be on two specific interventions -- early childhood education and workforce training -- that will increase residents’ access to opportunity and economic mobility. Request to hold allocation of approximately $10 mil until the completion of Phase 2. Can be adjusted based on actual spending. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Allison Rowland Budget and Policy Analyst DATE:February 15, 2022 RE: ORDINANCE: ACCESSIBILITY AND DISABILITY COMMISSION MOTION 1 – ADOPT ORDINANCE I move that the Council adopt the ordinance changes needed to formalize the Accessibility and Disability Commission as one of the City’s permanent Boards and Commissions. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance changes needed to formalize the Accessibility and Disability Commission as one of the City’s permanent Boards and Commissions, and to proceed to the next agenda item. SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2022 (An ordinance amending Section 2.07.020, Section 10.02.040, Section 10.02.110 and enacting Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission) An ordinance amending Section 2.07.020, Section 2.07.040, Section 10.02.040, and Section 10.02.110 and enacting Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council (the “Council”) desires to create an Accessibility and Disability Commission for the purposes identified herein; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that adopting this ordinance promotes the health, safety, and public welfare of the citizens of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 2.07.020. That Section 2.07.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (City Board and Commissions Named) shall be and hereby is amended to add Accessibility and Disability Commission to the list of City boards and commissions as follows: 2.07.020: CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS NAMED: Accessibility and disability commission Airport board Board of appeals and examiners Business advisory board Citizens' compensation advisory committee City and county building conservancy and use committee Community development and capital improvement programs advisory board Fire code board of appeals Golf enterprise fund advisory board Historic landmark commission Housing advisory and appeals board Housing trust fund advisory board Human rights commission Library board Parks, natural lands, trails, and urban forestry advisory board Planning commission Public utilities advisory committee Racial equity in policing commission Salt Lake art design board Salt Lake City arts council board Salt Lake City sister cities board Transportation advisory board SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 2.07.040. That Section 2.07.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Appointment; Advice and Consent:) shall be and hereby is amended as follows: 2.07.040: APPOINTMENT; ADVICE AND CONSENT: A. Appointments of city board members shall be made by the mayor with the advice and consent of the city council unless otherwise provided by this code or other law regarding a particular city board. B. City boards should represent a cross section of the city. To ensure that a cross section is represented, the city council should apply the following criteria in considering appointments to city boards: 1. Individuals should serve on only one board at a time, thus allowing more people to serve on boards. 2. City boards should have representatives from all geographic areas of the city. 3. Individuals who have not been involved in city government should be encouraged to participate through appointment to city boards. 4. Equal opportunity principles should be recognized in appointments. 5. Appointees should be city residents unless an exception in this code or other law applicable to a particular city board provides otherwise. C. Employees of Salt Lake City Corporation, whether merit or appointed, shall not be eligible for membership on a city board unless an exception in this code or other law applicable to a particular board allows such appointments. D. Spouses and family members of city employees may be considered for appointment to a city board when the board is not advisory to the employee's department or job responsibilities. SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 10.02.040. That Section 10.02.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Creation and Organization) shall be and hereby is amended and reads as follows: 10.02.040: CREATION AND ORGANIZATION: A. There is created the human rights commission which shall be composed of nine (9) members. B. Seven (7) representatives shall be appointed with one representative from each of the seven (7) council districts; and two (2) representatives shall be appointed from the community who represent the diversity of the city. C. Notwithstanding Section 2.07.040.B.1, at least one (1), but no more than two (2), of the members of the human rights commission shall also serve on the racial equity in policing commission and one other member of the human rights commission shall also serve on the accessibility and disability commission. Membership eligibility requirements for the racial equity in policing commission and the accessibility and disability commission are independent of the eligibility requirements for the human rights commission. SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 10.02.110. That Section 10.02.110 shall be and is hereby amended and reads as follows: 10.02.110: POWERS AND DUTIES: A. The commission shall make recommendations to the mayor and the council regarding the commission's: 1. Ongoing review of ordinances or policies; 2. Use of educational resources on issues of discrimination and equal treatment; 3. Review of complaints of discrimination involving city departments or city services for the purpose of identifying the possible systemic or institutional sources of such instances of discrimination; 4. Review of legislation, policies, or other action by the city designed to further the elimination of prejudice and discrimination; 5. Review of any pending legislation, policy changes, or other city action that may impact human rights and relations; 6. Research conducted or factual data obtained, within budgetary constraints, on the status and treatment of diverse populations and the best ways to improve human relations, to eliminate discrimination and to secure full and equal participation; 7. Investigation of opportunities to collaborate with other groups to foster nondiscrimination education; 8. Work in partnership to foster positive intergroup relations by instituting and conducting educational programs; 9. Actions as a resource at the request of community councils; and B. In addition to the powers and duties set forth in Subsection 10.02.110.A, the commission may review recommendations brought by the racial equity in policing commission and the accessibility and disability commission and issue a position of opposition or support of those recommendation. C. The commission shall report to the council and the mayor no less than once each year on its activities, recommendations, and findings concerning matters on human rights and nondiscrimination policies. The report shall be in writing and made accessible to the public. D. Beginning September 30, 2010, the commission shall prepare an annual report for the mayor and council assessing the effectiveness of the city's actions in implementing chapters 10.04 and 10.05 of this title. SECTION 5. Enacting the Text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 10.07. That Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and is hereby enacted to read as follows: CHAPTER 10.07 ACCESSIBILITY AND DISABILITY COMMISSION SECTION: 10.07.010: General Provisions 10.07.020: Purpose & Goals 10.07.030: Definitions 10.07.040: Creation and Organization 10.07.050: Term 10.07.060: Vacancy 10.07.070: Eligibility for Membership 10.07.080: Compensation 10.07.090: Meetings 10.07.100: Powers and Duties 10.07.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS: The provisions of chapter 2.07 of this title shall apply to the accessibility and disability commission except as otherwise set forth in this chapter. 10.07.020: PURPOSE & GOALS: The City of Salt Lake is comprised of diverse and varied groups, communities, and individuals, including people at all level of abilities. The accessibility and disability commission shall serve as an advisor to the mayor and the council on how the City can improve and generally enhance accessibility and the experience of the disability community through a practice, systematic, and solution-based approach 10.07.030: DEFINITIONS: Unless otherwise specified, as used in this chapter: CITY: Salt Lake City, a municipal corporation of the state of Utah. COMMISSION: Salt Lake City accessibility and disability commission created in section 10.62.040 of this chapter. COUNCIL: Salt Lake City Council. DISABILITY: has the same meaning as is defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 USC section 12102. MAYOR: The duly elected or appointed and qualified mayor of Salt Lake City. MEMBER: A person appointed by the mayor with the advice and consent of the council who is duly qualified as an acting and voting member of the commission. NATIONAL ORIGIN: The place of birth of an individual or any lineal ancestors. PERSON: An individual. 10.07.040: CREATION AND ORGANIZATION: A. There is created the accessibility and disability commission which shall be composed of fifteen (15) members. B. The Mayor shall appoint, with advice and consent of the Council, fifteen (15) members who represent a diverse range of accessibility and disability community perspectives. Notwithstanding Section 2.07.040.B.1, one (1) of the fifteen (15) members shall also be a member of the human rights commission. 10.07.050: TERM: The term of members of the commission shall be as set forth in Section 2.07.050, except that the initial term of five (5) members of the commission first appointed to the commission shall be for two (2) years to establish staggered terms. Each member's term shall expire on the applicable last Monday in December. 10.07.060: VACANCY: If a vacancy occurs for any reason before the member's term expires, the mayor, in exercising his or her discretion in making appointments, shall take into consideration the existing representation on the commission. 10.07.070: ELIGIBILITY FOR MEMBERSHIP: Each member of the commission shall either live, work, or own real property in Salt Lake City; own a business in Salt Lake City; or be employed by or otherwise serve as a representative of an organization or government agency serving the accessibility or disability community of Salt Lake City. Notwithstanding section 2.07.040.C, up to one member of the board shall be a city employee. 10.07.080: COMPENSATION: A member may receive reasonable compensation for their service as a commission member pursuant to applicable Salt Lake City policies. In the event that a commission member serves in their capacity as an employee of the State of Utah or any other governmental entity that commission member shall be ineligible to receive compensation. 10.07.090: MEETINGS: The commission is expected to meet monthly but shall meet no less than once quarterly. The annual meeting schedule shall be set at the first regular meeting in January of each year. 10.07.100: POWERS AND DUTIES: A. The commission shall: 1. Identify issues of importance to the accessibility and disability community and provide information to the mayor and the council pertinent to those issues, 2. Advise and assist the mayor and council on issues affecting the accessibility and disability community, and 3. Evaluate city policies and practices and make recommendations on how to increase access and participation among individuals with disabilities. B. Before making any recommendations to the mayor or the council, the Commission shall first share the recommendation with the Human Rights Commission who may review the recommendation and issue a position of support or opposition to the Commission’s recommendation. C. In addition to the powers and duties specified in this Section, the commission may review recommendations issued by the human rights commission and issue a statement of support or opposition to recommendations of the human rights commission which are relevant to the goals of the accessibility and disability commission. Positions of support or opposition issued pursuant to this subpart need not be reviewed by the human rights commission. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2022. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2022. Published: ______________. Ordinance Creating Accessibility and Disability Commission SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2022 (An ordinance amending Section 2.07.020, Section 10.02.040, Section 10.02.110 and enacting Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission) An ordinance amending Section 2.07.020, Section 2.07.040, Section 10.02.040, and Section 10.02.110 and enacting Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council (the “Council”) desires to create an Accessibility and Disability Commission for the purposes identified herein; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that adopting this ordinance promotes the health, safety, and public welfare of the citizens of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 2.07.020. That Section 2.07.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (City Board and Commissions Named) shall be and hereby is amended to add Accessibility and Disability Commission to the list of City boards and commissions as follows: 2.07.020: CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS NAMED: Accessibility and disability commission Airport board Board of appeals and examiners Business advisory board Citizens' compensation advisory committee City and county building conservancy and use committee Community development and capital improvement programs advisory board Fire code board of appeals Golf enterprise fund advisory board Historic landmark commission Housing advisory and appeals board Housing trust fund advisory board Human rights commission Library board Parks, natural lands, trails, and urban forestry advisory board Planning commission Public utilities advisory committee Racial equity in policing commission Salt Lake art design board Salt Lake City arts council board Salt Lake City sister cities board Transportation advisory board SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 2.07.040. That Section 2.07.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Appointment; Advice and Consent:) shall be and hereby is amended as follows: 2.07.040: APPOINTMENT; ADVICE AND CONSENT: A. Appointments of city board members shall be made by the mayor with the advice and consent of the city council unless otherwise provided by this code or other law regarding a particular city board. B. City boards should represent a cross section of the city. To ensure that a cross section is represented, the city council should apply the following criteria in considering appointments to city boards: 1. Individuals should serve on only one board at a time, thus allowing more people to serve on boards. 2. City boards should have representatives from all geographic areas of the city. 3. Individuals who have not been involved in city government should be encouraged to participate through appointment to city boards. 4. Equal opportunity principles should be recognized in appointments. 5. Appointees should be city residents unless an exception in this code or other law applicable to a particular city board provides otherwise. C. Employees of Salt Lake City Corporation, whether merit or appointed, shall not be eligible for membership on a city board unless an exception in this code or other law applicable to a particular board allows such appointments. D. Spouses and family members of city employees may be considered for appointment to a city board when the board is not advisory to the employee's department or job responsibilities. SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 10.02.040. That Section 10.02.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Creation and Organization) shall be and hereby is amended and reads as follows: 10.02.040: CREATION AND ORGANIZATION: A. There is created the human rights commission which shall be composed of nine (9) members. B. Seven (7) representatives shall be appointed with one representative from each of the seven (7) council districts; and two (2) representatives shall be appointed from the community who represent the diversity of the city. C. Notwithstanding Section 2.07.040.B.1, at least one (1), but no more than two (2), of the members of the human rights commission shall also serve on the racial equity in policing commission and one other member of the human rights commission shall also serve on the accessibility and disability commission. Membership eligibility requirements for the racial equity in policing commission and the accessibility and disability commission are independent of the eligibility requirements for the human rights commission. SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 10.02.110. That Section 10.02.110 shall be and is hereby amended and reads as follows: 10.02.110: POWERS AND DUTIES: A. The commission shall make recommendations to the mayor and the council regarding the commission's: 1. Ongoing review of ordinances or policies; 2. Use of educational resources on issues of discrimination and equal treatment; 3. Review of complaints of discrimination involving city departments or city services for the purpose of identifying the possible systemic or institutional sources of such instances of discrimination; 4. Review of legislation, policies, or other action by the city designed to further the elimination of prejudice and discrimination; 5. Review of any pending legislation, policy changes, or other city action that may impact human rights and relations; 6. Research conducted or factual data obtained, within budgetary constraints, on the status and treatment of diverse populations and the best ways to improve human relations, to eliminate discrimination and to secure full and equal participation; 7. Investigation of opportunities to collaborate with other groups to foster nondiscrimination education; 8. Work in partnership to foster positive intergroup relations by instituting and conducting educational programs; 9. Actions as a resource at the request of community councils; and B. In addition to the powers and duties set forth in Subsection 10.02.110.A, the commission may review recommendations brought by the racial equity in policing commission and the accessibility and disability commission and issue a position of opposition or support of those recommendation. C. The commission shall report to the council and the mayor no less than once each year on its activities, recommendations, and findings concerning matters on human rights and nondiscrimination policies. The report shall be in writing and made accessible to the public. D. Beginning September 30, 2010, the commission shall prepare an annual report for the mayor and council assessing the effectiveness of the city's actions in implementing chapters 10.04 and 10.05 of this title. SECTION 5. Enacting the Text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 10.07. That Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and is hereby enacted to read as follows: CHAPTER 10.07 ACCESSIBILITY AND DISABILITY COMMISSION SECTION: 10.07.010: General Provisions 10.07.020: Purpose & Goals 10.07.030: Definitions 10.07.040: Creation and Organization 10.07.050: Term 10.07.060: Vacancy 10.07.070: Eligibility for Membership 10.07.080: Compensation 10.07.090: Meetings 10.07.100: Powers and Duties 10.07.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS: The provisions of chapter 2.07 of this title shall apply to the accessibility and disability commission except as otherwise set forth in this chapter. 10.07.020: PURPOSE & GOALS: The City of Salt Lake is comprised of diverse and varied groups, communities, and individuals, including people at all level of abilities. The accessibility and disability commission shall serve as an advisor to the mayor and the council on how the City can improve and generally enhance accessibility and the experience of the disability community through a practice, systematic, and solution-based approach 10.07.030: DEFINITIONS: Unless otherwise specified, as used in this chapter: CITY: Salt Lake City, a municipal corporation of the state of Utah. COMMISSION: Salt Lake City accessibility and disability commission created in section 10.62.040 of this chapter. COUNCIL: Salt Lake City Council. DISABILITY: has the same meaning as is defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 USC section 12102. MAYOR: The duly elected or appointed and qualified mayor of Salt Lake City. MEMBER: A person appointed by the mayor with the advice and consent of the council who is duly qualified as an acting and voting member of the commission. NATIONAL ORIGIN: The place of birth of an individual or any lineal ancestors. PERSON: An individual. 10.07.040: CREATION AND ORGANIZATION: A. There is created the accessibility and disability commission which shall be composed of fifteen (15) members. B. The Mayor shall appoint, with advice and consent of the Council, fifteen (15) members who represent a diverse range of accessibility and disability community perspectives. Notwithstanding Section 2.07.040.B.1, one (1) of the fifteen (15) members shall also be a member of the human rights commission. 10.07.050: TERM: The term of members of the commission shall be as set forth in Section 2.07.050, except that the initial term of five (5) members of the commission first appointed to the commission shall be for two (2) years to establish staggered terms. Each member's term shall expire on the applicable last Monday in December. 10.07.060: VACANCY: If a vacancy occurs for any reason before the member's term expires, the mayor, in exercising his or her discretion in making appointments, shall take into consideration the existing representation on the commission. 10.07.070: ELIGIBILITY FOR MEMBERSHIP: Each member of the commission shall either live, work, or own real property in Salt Lake City; own a business in Salt Lake City; or be employed by or otherwise serve as a representative of an organization or government agency serving the accessibility or disability community of Salt Lake City. Notwithstanding section 2.07.040.C, up to one member of the board shall be a city employee. 10.07.080: COMPENSATION: A member may receive reasonable compensation for their service as a commission member pursuant to applicable Salt Lake City policies. In the event that a commission member serves in their capacity as an employee of the State of Utah or any other governmental entity that commission member shall be ineligible to receive compensation. 10.07.090: MEETINGS: The commission is expected to meet monthly but shall meet no less than once quarterly. The annual meeting schedule shall be set at the first regular meeting in January of each year. 10.07.100: POWERS AND DUTIES: A. The commission shall: 1. Identify issues of importance to the accessibility and disability community and provide information to the mayor and the council pertinent to those issues, 2. Advise and assist the mayor and council on issues affecting the accessibility and disability community, and 3. Evaluate city policies and practices and make recommendations on how to increase access and participation among individuals with disabilities. B. Before making any recommendations to the mayor or the council, the Commission shall first share the recommendation with the Human Rights Commission who may review the recommendation and issue a position of support or opposition to the Commission’s recommendation. C. In addition to the powers and duties specified in this Section, the commission may review recommendations issued by the human rights commission and issue a statement of support or opposition to recommendations of the human rights commission which are relevant to the goals of the accessibility and disability commission. Positions of support or opposition issued pursuant to this subpart need not be reviewed by the human rights commission. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2022. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2022. Published: ______________. Ordinance Creating Accessibility and Disability Commission 2/14/22 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date Received: 1/11/22 Date Sent to Council: 1/21/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 1/11/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Kaletta Lynch, Chief Equity Officer __________________________ SUBJECT: Accessibility and Disability Commission Ordinance STAFF CONTACTS: Ashley Lichtle, ADA Coordinator, Ashley.Lichtle@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Draft a n ordinance amending Section 2.07.020, Section 10.02.040, Section 10.02.110 and enacting Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Accessibility Advisory Committee was formed to serve as an advisor on how the City can improve and generally enhance accessibility and the experience of the disability community through a practice, systematic, and solution-based approach. The Accessibility Advisory Committee provides a deep and complex understanding of disability and disability resources in the City and statewide, and each member has a commitment to and passion for making Salt Lake City accessible and inclusive to all. Current Accessibility Advisory Committee have been active on the Accessibility Advisory Committee for many years and represent a diverse range of accessibility and disability community perspectives. The Accessibility Advisory Committee has spent years identifying issues of importance to the accessibility and disability community and providing information pertinent to those issues The Accessibility Advisory Committee also advises and assists the City on issues affecting the accessibility and disability community and evaluates City policies and practices and makes Lisa Shaffer (Jan 21, 2022 16:32 MST) ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 recommendations on how to increase access and participation among individuals with disabilities. This proposal is to transition the Accessibility Advisory Committee into the Accessibility and Disability Commission by amending Section 2.07.020, Section 10.02.040, Section 10.02.110 and enacting Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission EXHIBITS: •Proposed ordinance amending Section 2.07.020, Section 10.02.040, Section 10.02.110 and enacting Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission NOTES: •Kaletta Lynch, Chief Equity Officer, and Ashley Lichtle, ADA Coordinator, plan to attend VIRTUALLY to present this ordinance proposal. •The current Accessibility Advisory Committee has reviewed this proposed ordinance and are in agreement with the terms and proposed changes included. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 1 No. _____ of 2022 2 3 (An ordinance amending Section 2.07.020, Section 10.02.040, Section 10.02.110 and enacting 4 Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission) 5 6 An ordinance amending Section 2.07.020, Section 2.07.040, Section 10.02.040, and Section 7 10.02.110 and enacting Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and 8 Disability Commission. 9 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council (the “Council”) desires to create an Accessibility and 10 Disability Commission for the purposes identified herein; and 11 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that adopting this ordinance promotes the 12 health, safety, and public welfare of the citizens of the City. 13 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 14 SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 2.07.020. That Section 15 2.07.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (City Board and Commissions Named) shall be and hereby is 16 amended to add Accessibility and Disability Commission to the list of City boards and commissions 17 as follows: 18 2.07.020: CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS NAMED: 19 Accessibility and disability commission 20 Airport board 21 Board of appeals and examiners 22 Business advisory board 23 Citizens' compensation advisory committee 24 City and county building conservancy and use committee 25 Community development and capital improvement programs advisory board 26 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Fire code board of appeals 27 Golf enterprise fund advisory board 28 Historic landmark commission 29 Housing advisory and appeals board 30 Housing trust fund advisory board 31 Human rights commission 32 Library board 33 Parks, natural lands, trails, and urban forestry advisory board 34 Planning commission 35 Public utilities advisory committee 36 Racial equity in policing commission 37 Salt Lake art design board 38 Salt Lake City arts council board 39 Salt Lake City sister cities board 40 Transportation advisory board 41 42 SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 2.07.040. That Section 43 2.07.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Appointment; Advice and Consent:) shall be and hereby is 44 amended as follows: 45 2.07.040: APPOINTMENT; ADVICE AND CONSENT: 46 A. Appointments of city board members shall be made by the mayor with the advice and consent of 47 the city council unless otherwise provided by this code or other law regarding a particular city board. 48 B. City boards should represent a cross section of the city. To ensure that a cross section is 49 represented, the city council should apply the following criteria in considering appointments to 50 city boards: 51 1. Individuals should serve on only one board at a time, thus allowing more people to serve 52 on boards. 53 2. City boards should have representatives from all geographic areas of the city. 54 3. Individuals who have not been involved in city government should be encouraged to 55 participate through appointment to city boards. 56 4. Equal opportunity principles should be recognized in appointments. 57 5. Appointees should be city residents unless an exception in this code or other law 58 applicable to a particular city board provides otherwise. 59 C. Employees of Salt Lake City Corporation, whether merit or appointed, shall not be eligible 60 for membership on a city board unless an exception in this code or other law applicable to a 61 particular board allows such appointments. Such exceptions include the: 62 1. Housing authority board, as provided in section 35A-8-404, Utah code; and 63 2. Utah performing arts center board, as provided in section 2.96.020 of this title. 64 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT D. Spouses and family members of city employees may be considered for appointment to a 65 city board when the board is not advisory to the employee's department or job responsibilities. 66 67 SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 10.02.040. That Section 68 10.02.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Creation and Organization) shall be and hereby is amended 69 and reads as follows: 70 10.02.040: CREATION AND ORGANIZATION: 71 A. There is created the human rights commission which shall be composed of nine (9) 72 members. 73 B. Seven (7) representatives shall be appointed with one representative from each of the seven 74 (7) council districts; and two (2) representatives shall be appointed from the community who 75 represent the diversity of the city. 76 C. Notwithstanding Section 2.07.040.B.1, at least one (1), but no more than two (2), of the 77 members of the human rights commission shall also serve on the racial equity in policing 78 commission and one other member of the human rights commission shall also serve on the 79 accessibility and disability commission. Membership eligibility requirements for the racial equity 80 in policing commission and the accessibility and disability commission are is independent of the 81 eligibility requirements for the human rights commission. 82 83 SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 10.02.110. That Section 84 10.02.110 shall be and is hereby amended and reads as follows: 85 10.02.110: POWERS AND DUTIES: 86 A. The commission shall make recommendations to the mayor and the council regarding the 87 commission's: 88 1. Ongoing review of ordinances or policies; 89 2. Use of educational resources on issues of discrimination and equal treatment; 90 3. Review of complaints of discrimination involving city departments or city services for 91 the purpose of identifying the possible systemic or institutional sources of such instances of 92 discrimination; 93 4. Review of legislation, policies, or other action by the city designed to further the 94 elimination of prejudice and discrimination; 95 5. Review of any pending legislation, policy changes, or other city action that may impact 96 human rights and relations; 97 6. Research conducted or factual data obtained, within budgetary constraints, on the status 98 and treatment of diverse populations and the best ways to improve human relations, to eliminate 99 discrimination and to secure full and equal participation; 100 7. Investigation of opportunities to collaborate with other groups to foster nondiscrimination 101 education; 102 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 8. Work in partnership to foster positive intergroup relations by instituting and conducting 103 educational programs; 104 9. Actions as a resource at the request of community councils; and 105 B. In addition to the powers and duties set forth in Subsection 10.02.110.A, the commission 106 may review recommendations brought by the racial equity in policing commission and the 107 accessibility and disability commission and issue a position of opposition or support of those 108 recommendation. 109 C. The commission shall report to the council and the mayor no less than once each year on its 110 activities, recommendations, and findings concerning matters on human rights and 111 nondiscrimination policies. The report shall be in writing and made accessible to the public. 112 D. Beginning September 30, 2010, the commission shall prepare an annual report for the mayor 113 and city council assessing the effectiveness of the city's actions in implementing chapters 10.04 114 and 10.05 of this title. 115 116 SECTION 5. Enacting the Text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 10.07. That Chapter 10.07 of 117 the Salt Lake City Code shall be and is hereby enacted to read as follows: 118 CHAPTER 10.07 119 ACCESSIBILITY AND DISABILITY COMMISSION 120 SECTION: 121 10.07.010: General Provisions 122 10.07.020: Purpose & Goals 123 10.07.030: Definitions 124 10.07.040: Creation and Organization 125 10.07.050: Term 126 10.07.060: Vacancy 127 10.07.070: Eligibility for Membership 128 10.07.080: Compensation 129 10.07.090: Meetings 130 10.07.100: Powers and Duties 131 132 10.07.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS: 133 The provisions of chapter 2.07 of this title shall apply to the accessibility and disability 134 commission except as otherwise set forth in this chapter. 135 136 10.07.020: PURPOSE & GOALS: 137 The City of Salt Lake is comprised of diverse and varied groups, communities, and individuals, 138 including people at all level of abilities. The accessibility and disability commission shall serve 139 as an advisor to the mayor on how the City can improve and generally enhance accessibility and 140 the experience of the disability community through a practice, systematic, and solution-based 141 approach 142 143 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 10.07.030: DEFINITIONS: 144 Unless otherwise specified, as used in this chapter: 145 CITY: Salt Lake City, a municipal corporation of the state of Utah. 146 COMMISSION: Salt Lake City accessibility and disability commission created in section 147 10.62.040 of this chapter. 148 COUNCIL: Salt Lake City council. 149 DISABILITY: has the same meaning as is defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 150 1990, 42 USC section 12102. 151 MAYOR: The duly elected or appointed and qualified mayor of Salt Lake City. 152 MEMBER: A person appointed by the mayor with the advice and consent of the council who is 153 duly qualified as an acting and voting member of the commission. 154 NATIONAL ORIGIN: The place of birth of an individual or any lineal ancestors. 155 PERSON: An individual. 156 157 10.07.040: CREATION AND ORGANIZATION: 158 A. There is created the accessibility and disability commission which shall be composed of 159 fifteen (15) members. 160 B. The Mayor shall appoint, with advice and consent of the Council, fifteen (15) members 161 who represent a diverse range of accessibility and disability community perspectives. 162 Notwithstanding Section 2.07.040.B.1, one (1) of the fifteen (15) members shall also be a 163 member of the human rights commission. 164 165 10.07.050: TERM: 166 The term of members of the commission shall be as set forth in Section 2.07.050, except that the 167 initial term of five (5) members of the commission first appointed to the commission shall be for 168 two (2) years to establish staggered terms. Each member's term shall expire on the applicable 169 last Monday in December. 170 171 10.07.060: VACANCY: 172 If a vacancy occurs for any reason before the member's term expires, the mayor, in exercising his 173 or her discretion in making appointments, shall take into consideration the existing 174 representation on the commission. 175 176 10.07.070: ELIGIBILITY FOR MEMBERSHIP: 177 Each member of the commission shall either live, work, or own real property in Salt Lake City; 178 own a business in Salt Lake City; or be employed by or otherwise serve as a representative of an 179 organization or government agency serving the accessibility or disability community of Salt 180 Lake City. Notwithstanding section 2.07.040.C, up to one member of the board shall be a city 181 employee. 182 183 10.07.080: COMPENSATION: 184 A member may receive reasonable compensation for their service as a commission member 185 pursuant to applicable Salt Lake City policies. In the event that a commission member serves in 186 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT their capacity as an employee of the State of Utah or any other governmental entity that 187 commission member shall be ineligible to receive compensation. 188 189 10.07.090: MEETINGS: 190 The commission is expected to meet monthly but shall meet no less than once quarterly. The 191 annual meeting schedule shall be set at the first regular meeting in January of each year. 192 193 10.07.100: POWERS AND DUTIES: 194 A. The commission shall: 195 1. Identify issues of importance to the accessibility and disability community and provide 196 information to the Mayor pertinent to those issues 197 2. Advise and assist the Mayor on issues affecting the accessibility and disability 198 community 199 3. Evaluate City policies and practices and make recommendations on how to increase 200 access and participation among individuals with disabilities. 201 B. Before making any recommendations to the Mayor, the Commission shall first share the 202 recommendation with the Human Rights Commission who may review the recommendation and 203 issue a position of support or opposition to the Commission’s recommendation. 204 205 SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance take effect immediately after it has been 206 published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code 207 §10-3-713. 208 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of 209 ______________, 2022. 210 ______________________________ 211 CHAIRPERSON 212 213 ATTEST: 214 215 ______________________________ 216 CITY RECORDER 217 218 219 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 220 221 222 Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 223 224 225 ______________________________ 226 MAYOR 227 228 ______________________________ 229 CITY RECORDER 230 231 (SEAL) 232 233 Bill No. ________ of 2022. 234 Published: ______________. 235 Ordinance Creating Accessibility and Disability Commission 236 237 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2022 (An ordinance amending Section 2.07.020, Section 10.02.040, Section 10.02.110 and enacting Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission) An ordinance amending Section 2.07.020, Section 2.07.040, Section 10.02.040, and Section 10.02.110 and enacting Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council (the “Council”) desires to create an Accessibility and Disability Commission for the purposes identified herein; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that adopting this ordinance promotes the health, safety, and public welfare of the citizens of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 2.07.020. That Section 2.07.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (City Board and Commissions Named) shall be and hereby is amended to add Accessibility and Disability Commission to the list of City boards and commissions as follows: 2.07.020: CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS NAMED: Accessibility and disability commission Airport board Board of appeals and examiners Business advisory board Citizens' compensation advisory committee City and county building conservancy and use committee Community development and capital improvement programs advisory board Fire code board of appeals Golf enterprise fund advisory board Historic landmark commission Housing advisory and appeals board Housing trust fund advisory board Human rights commission Library board Parks, natural lands, trails, and urban forestry advisory board Planning commission Public utilities advisory committee Racial equity in policing commission Salt Lake art design board Salt Lake City arts council board Salt Lake City sister cities board Transportation advisory board SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 2.07.040. That Section 2.07.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Appointment; Advice and Consent:) shall be and hereby is amended as follows: 2.07.040: APPOINTMENT; ADVICE AND CONSENT: A. Appointments of city board members shall be made by the mayor with the advice and consent of the city council unless otherwise provided by this code or other law regarding a particular city board. B. City boards should represent a cross section of the city. To ensure that a cross section is represented, the city council should apply the following criteria in considering appointments to city boards: 1. Individuals should serve on only one board at a time, thus allowing more people to serve on boards. 2. City boards should have representatives from all geographic areas of the city. 3. Individuals who have not been involved in city government should be encouraged to participate through appointment to city boards. 4. Equal opportunity principles should be recognized in appointments. 5. Appointees should be city residents unless an exception in this code or other law applicable to a particular city board provides otherwise. C. Employees of Salt Lake City Corporation, whether merit or appointed, shall not be eligible for membership on a city board unless an exception in this code or other law applicable to a particular board allows such appointments. D. Spouses and family members of city employees may be considered for appointment to a city board when the board is not advisory to the employee's department or job responsibilities. SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 10.02.040. That Section 10.02.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Creation and Organization) shall be and hereby is amended and reads as follows: 10.02.040: CREATION AND ORGANIZATION: A. There is created the human rights commission which shall be composed of nine (9) members. B. Seven (7) representatives shall be appointed with one representative from each of the seven (7) council districts; and two (2) representatives shall be appointed from the community who represent the diversity of the city. C. Notwithstanding Section 2.07.040.B.1, at least one (1), but no more than two (2), of the members of the human rights commission shall also serve on the racial equity in policing commission and one other member of the human rights commission shall also serve on the accessibility and disability commission. Membership eligibility requirements for the racial equity in policing commission and the accessibility and disability commission are independent of the eligibility requirements for the human rights commission. SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 10.02.110. That Section 10.02.110 shall be and is hereby amended and reads as follows: 10.02.110: POWERS AND DUTIES: A. The commission shall make recommendations to the mayor and the council regarding the commission's: 1. Ongoing review of ordinances or policies; 2. Use of educational resources on issues of discrimination and equal treatment; 3. Review of complaints of discrimination involving city departments or city services for the purpose of identifying the possible systemic or institutional sources of such instances of discrimination; 4. Review of legislation, policies, or other action by the city designed to further the elimination of prejudice and discrimination; 5. Review of any pending legislation, policy changes, or other city action that may impact human rights and relations; 6. Research conducted or factual data obtained, within budgetary constraints, on the status and treatment of diverse populations and the best ways to improve human relations, to eliminate discrimination and to secure full and equal participation; 7. Investigation of opportunities to collaborate with other groups to foster nondiscrimination education; 8.Work in partnership to foster positive intergroup relations by instituting and conducting educational programs; 9.Actions as a resource at the request of community councils; and B. In addition to the powers and duties set forth in Subsection 10.02.110.A, the commission may review recommendations brought by the racial equity in policing commission and the accessibility and disability commission and issue a position of opposition or support of those recommendation. C. The commission shall report to the council and the mayor no less than once each year on its activities, recommendations, and findings concerning matters on human rights and nondiscrimination policies. The report shall be in writing and made accessible to the public. D.Beginning September 30, 2010, the commission shall prepare an annual report for the mayor and city council assessing the effectiveness of the city's actions in implementing chapters 10.04 and 10.05 of this title. SECTION 5. Enacting the Text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 10.07. That Chapter 10.07 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and is hereby enacted to read as follows: CHAPTER 10.07 ACCESSIBILITY AND DISABILITY COMMISSION SECTION: 10.07.010: General Provisions 10.07.020: Purpose & Goals 10.07.030: Definitions 10.07.040: Creation and Organization 10.07.050: Term 10.07.060: Vacancy 10.07.070: Eligibility for Membership 10.07.080: Compensation 10.07.090: Meetings 10.07.100: Powers and Duties 10.07.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS: The provisions of chapter 2.07 of this title shall apply to the accessibility and disability commission except as otherwise set forth in this chapter. 10.07.020: PURPOSE & GOALS: The City of Salt Lake is comprised of diverse and varied groups, communities, and individuals, including people at all level of abilities. The accessibility and disability commission shall serve as an advisor to the mayor on how the City can improve and generally enhance accessibility and the experience of the disability community through a practice, systematic, and solution-based approach 10.07.030: DEFINITIONS: Unless otherwise specified, as used in this chapter: CITY: Salt Lake City, a municipal corporation of the state of Utah. COMMISSION: Salt Lake City accessibility and disability commission created in section 10.62.040 of this chapter. COUNCIL: Salt Lake City council. DISABILITY: has the same meaning as is defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 USC section 12102. MAYOR: The duly elected or appointed and qualified mayor of Salt Lake City. MEMBER: A person appointed by the mayor with the advice and consent of the council who is duly qualified as an acting and voting member of the commission. NATIONAL ORIGIN: The place of birth of an individual or any lineal ancestors. PERSON: An individual. 10.07.040: CREATION AND ORGANIZATION: A. There is created the accessibility and disability commission which shall be composed of fifteen (15) members. B. The Mayor shall appoint, with advice and consent of the Council, fifteen (15) members who represent a diverse range of accessibility and disability community perspectives. Notwithstanding Section 2.07.040.B.1, one (1) of the fifteen (15) members shall also be a member of the human rights commission. 10.07.050: TERM: The term of members of the commission shall be as set forth in Section 2.07.050, except that the initial term of five (5) members of the commission first appointed to the commission shall be for two (2) years to establish staggered terms. Each member's term shall expire on the applicable last Monday in December. 10.07.060: VACANCY: If a vacancy occurs for any reason before the member's term expires, the mayor, in exercising his or her discretion in making appointments, shall take into consideration the existing representation on the commission. 10.07.070: ELIGIBILITY FOR MEMBERSHIP: Each member of the commission shall either live, work, or own real property in Salt Lake City; own a business in Salt Lake City; or be employed by or otherwise serve as a representative of an organization or government agency serving the accessibility or disability community of Salt Lake City. Notwithstanding section 2.07.040.C, up to one member of the board shall be a city employee. 10.07.080: COMPENSATION: A member may receive reasonable compensation for their service as a commission member pursuant to applicable Salt Lake City policies. In the event that a commission member serves in their capacity as an employee of the State of Utah or any other governmental entity that commission member shall be ineligible to receive compensation. 10.07.090: MEETINGS: The commission is expected to meet monthly but shall meet no less than once quarterly. The annual meeting schedule shall be set at the first regular meeting in January of each year. 10.07.100: POWERS AND DUTIES: A. The commission shall: 1. Identify issues of importance to the accessibility and disability community and provide information to the Mayor pertinent to those issues 2. Advise and assist the Mayor on issues affecting the accessibility and disability community 3. Evaluate City policies and practices and make recommendations on how to increase access and participation among individuals with disabilities. B. Before making any recommendations to the Mayor, the Commission shall first share the recommendation with the Human Rights Commission who may review the recommendation and issue a position of support or opposition to the Commission’s recommendation. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2022. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2022. Published: ______________. Ordinance Creating Accessibility and Disability Commission 1/21/2022 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:February 15, 2022 RE: 1583 East Stratford Avenue Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendments PLNPCM2020-00393 & PLNPCM2020-00394 The Council will be briefed about an ordinance that would amend zoning of the parcel at approximately 1583 East Stratford Avenue from its current RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-family) zoning designation to CN (Neighborhood Commercial). The proposal would also amend the Sugar House Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map for the properties from “Medium Density Residential” to “Neighborhood Business.” The applicant originally proposed changing use of the site on the northeast corner of Stratford Avenue and Glenmare Street from residential condominiums to office use. It should be noted the subject property is under the same ownership as the parcel immediately west across Glenmare Street, which is also used for offices and, if the proposal is approved, would extend its business campus to the subject property. Planning staff recommended and the Planning Commission forwarded a unanimous negative recommendation to the City Council for the proposed amendments. Eight people spoke at the March 24, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing. All were opposed to the rezone request. Concerns cited include a loss of naturally occurring affordable housing units in a neighborhood largely comprised of single-family homes, reducing already limited multi-family housing units (Planning staff found 17 multi-family housing units in the area), the proposed business use doesn’t serve the neighborhood, additional traffic and parking, and construction without permits converting two of the residential condominiums into one commercial unit. Following the Planning Commission’s negative recommendation, the applicant worked with Planning staff to amend their request and agreed to keep six residential units on site through a condition of approval. The updated proposal includes constructing a building on the property for office use north of the existing Item Schedule: Briefing: February 15, 2022 Set Date: February 15, 2022 Public Hearing: March 1, 2022 Potential Action: March 22, 2022 Page | 2 building or demolishing the existing condominium structure and replacing it with a new mixed-use building. It is unclear if a new building north of the current condominium structure, of sufficient size for offices, would meet setback and buffer requirements. Mixed-use including offices and residential units are allowed “by right” under the proposed CN zoning designation. Mixed-use developments are not allowed within the existing RMF-35 zoning designation. Aerial image with subject property outlined in red. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. The Council may wish to ask if any of the potential new housing units will be affordable. If so, at what percentage of AMI and for how long? 2. The Council may wish to ask if the applicant plans to assist current tenants with relocation. 3. Is the Council supportive of the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The current structure was developed in 1985 as an apartment building. At that time, it was in the B-3 zoning district which allowed all types of housing, retail shops, and retail services. During the 1995 citywide zoning ordinance and zoning map update the subject property was rezoned to RMF-35 based on its use as multi-family residential. The subject parcel is in a small commercial node well-known in the community. This node includes offices, restaurants, and retail shops. Other multi-family residential housing in the area includes a three-unit condominium building adjacent to the east of the subject property, and a six-unit condominium building located on the southwest corner of Stratford Avenue and Glenmare Street. Parcels in the commercial node are zoned either RMF-35 or CN as shown in the area zoning map below. Page | 3 Area zoning map with subject parcel outlined in red. Planning staff identified three key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 3-9 of the Planning Commission staff report. They are summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the staff report. Consideration 1-Compatibility with Master Plan Policies Planning staff noted the subject property meets the intent and location criteria of the Medium Density Residential future land use map in the Sugar House Master Plan, as the current building meets the building height and garden type of apartment development. However, it is Planning’s opinion the original proposed use as office space is not consistent with the future land use map because it would not provide desired residential services within walking distance. Eliminating residential in favor of increasing office space rather than services would not further the neighborhood commercial node. Growing SLC, the city-wide plan, includes goals to address issues resulting from the city’s growing population and ensure access to affordable housing. One of the Plan’s goals is to “increase housing opportunities for cost burdened households.” It includes housing opportunities in neighborhoods without many choices for cost burdened families. Planning staff believes the proposed amendments do not align with the goals of Growing SLC. Plan Salt Lake, another city-wide plan also includes goals for providing a variety of housing types throughout the city which include: “Ensure access to affordable housing citywide (including rental and very low income).” “Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the City, providing the basic human need for safety and responding to changing demographics.” Page | 4 Consideration 2-Urban Resiliency and Diversity of Housing Planning staff noted an attribute of resilient places is a diversity of housing. They referenced a National Science Foundation study that found diverse housing types promotes stability in the community and market changes have an impact on affordable housing. An American Planning Association Policy Guide on Housing was also mentioned by Planning staff. It notes housing diversity in neighborhoods helps assure community viability by allowing for housing throughout life phases, different income levels, and different lifestyles. These help lead to more stable housing demand in communities through market changes. Planning staff found the existing condominiums are naturally occurring affordable housing. It is unknown if housing units in a new building would be affordable or market rate. Consideration 3-CN District Compatibility and RMF-35/CN Zoning District Comparison The CN District purpose statement says: The CN Neighborhood Commercial District is intended to provide for small scale, low intensity commercial uses that can be located within and serve residential neighborhoods. This district is appropriate in areas where supported by applicable master plans and along local streets that are served by multiple transportation modes, such as pedestrian, bicycle, transit and automobiles. The standards for the district are intended to reinforce the historic scale and ambiance of traditional neighborhood retail that is oriented toward the pedestrian while ensuring adequate transit and automobile access. Uses are restricted in size to promote local orientation and to limit adverse impacts on nearby residential areas. The table below compares standards for the RMF-35 and CN zoning designations. It might be noted the existing building setbacks are 27’ from the front and corner side yard property lines. If the property is rezoned to CN it would result in the existing structure being in non-compliance with setback requirements. That said, a new structure could be built in compliance with setbacks. Zone Max. Building Height Front Yard Min.Front Yard Max. Side/Corner Side Yard Minimums Rear Yard RMF-35 35’20’No Maximum 4’/10’20’-25’ CN 25’15’25’Same as Front Yard 10’ The existing RMF-35 zoning district requires a 10’ landscape buffer when adjacent to a single-family residential district. The subject parcel requires a buffer on the north and east property lines. Planning staff stated it appears the requirement is not currently being met. In the proposed CN zoning designation, a 7’ landscape buffer is required when abutting residential districts. If the proposed amendments are approved, landscape buffers would be required on the north and east property lines. ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Attachment C (pages 27-28) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Page | 5 Factor Finding Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Does not comply Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Does not comply The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent properties Complies Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Complies The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection. Complies PUBLIC PROCESS • June 5, 2020-Information about petition sent to the Sugar House Community Council. • June 20, 2020-Sugar House Community Council meeting discussion. Comments included concerns about loss of housing/affordable housing, traffic and parking, offices not useful to the neighborhood, current enforcement issues, liked live/work type of neighborhood. • June 20, 2020-Early notification mailed to property owners within 300’ of the subject parcel. • March 11, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing notice mailed to neighbors within 300’ of the zoning map amendment site. • March 11, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing newspaper notice. • March 12, 2021-Planning Commission notice posted on property. • March 24, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a negative recommendation to the City Council. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION // FEBRUARY 15, 2022 1583 EAST STRATFORD AVE: MASTER PLAN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS PLNPCM2020-00393/00394 1583 EAST STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City // Planning Division VICINITY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS •Current: RMF-35 •Proposed: CN Salt Lake City // Planning Division ZONING MAP Future Land Use Map •Current: Medium Density Residential •Proposed: Neighborhood Business Salt Lake City // Planning Division MASTER PLAN Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Neighborhood Business Yard Standards Salt Lake City // Planning Division ZONE COMPARISON Zone Front Yard Min.Front Yard Max.Side/Corner Side Yards Rear Yard RMF-35 20’No Max.4’/10’20’-25’ CN 15’25’0’/ 25’10’ Zone When Abutting Res. District RMF-35 10’ CN 7’ Landscape Buffer Zone Max. Building Height RMF-35 35’ CN 25’ Building Height Land Use •Significant permitted and conditional land use differences. Sugar House Master Plan •“Prohibit the expansion of non- residential land uses into areas of medium-density residential” •Identifies the Stratford/Glenmare intersection as a commercial node. •The intent is to allow adjacent neighborhoods access to services that are within walking distance. The commercial node, “may consist of four corner sites or isolated parcels”. •Encourages increasing opportunities for affordable housing. Salt Lake City // Planning Division COMPATIBILITY WITH MASTER PLANS Growing SLC •“Increasing housing opportunities for cost-burdened households” •Ensure life cycle housing types are available for different life stages Plan Salt Lake •“Ensure access to affordable housing citywide” •“Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the City,…responding to changing demographics” QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS Salt Lake City // Planning Division Nan Larsen // Senior Planner Nannette.Larsen@slcgov.com Erin Mendenhall DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 27, 2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: PLNPCM2020-00393/00394 – 1583 East Stratford Avenue Master Plan & Zoning Map Amendments STAFF CONTACT: Nannette Larsen, Senior Planner, nannette.larsen@slcgov.com 801-535-7645 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission forwarded a unanimous decision recommending denial of the proposed amendments. The applicant has modified his request agreeing to enter into a development agreement to retain the existing residential uses. Staff recommends that the Council consider this request with the proposed modifications. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Spring of 2020 the applicant, Erin Hoffman, representing the property owner Stratford Investment Properties initiated a petition to amend the Master Plan’s Future Land Use Map and the Zoning Map. The request is for a property located at approximately 1583 East Stratford Avenue, the site is presently used as a residential condominium complex. The petition would amend the property from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Business on the Sugar House Future Land Use Map and amend the zoning map from RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial). Planning Staff recommended that the Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation to City Council at the time. The Planning Commission heard the petition on March 24 of 2021 where they forwarded a recommendation to deny the proposal to City Council. Lisa Shaffer (Jan 28, 2022 14:52 MST)01/28/2022 01/28/2022 After the Planning Commission public hearing the applicant worked with Staff to amend the proposal to better conform to the Sugar House Master Plan and the City-wide Plan Salt Lake. The applicant amended their proposal after a number of meetings with city staff. Initially, the applicant was proposing to remove the 6-residential units on the site and convert the building to an office use. The CN district permits both residential and office uses as by right. Because there was concerns about losing naturally occurring affordable housing in a predominantly single-family neighborhood, there were also concerns regarding diversity of housing in the neighborhood. Presently there are a limited number of multi-family houses in the area (only 17- residential units) that losing 6- residential units sufficiently reduces housing choices in the neighborhood. After the Planning Commission public hearing the applicant worked with staff on changes to the proposal to amend the Master Plan and Zoning Map. The applicant agreed to keeping the 6-residential units on site through a condition of approval of the proposed amendments. The updated proposal would include an additional office building on the site with the 6- residential units that will remain. The proposed mixed- use development of the site will likely be designed so that it is permitted by right in the proposed CN district. The subject property is located on a corner site, fronting along two streets of Stratford Avenue and Glenmare Street. The site is within the Highland Park Place A subdivision in 1909 as a residential site. While there was no zoning designation in Salt Lake City at the time, the parcel layout in this subdivision was for a residential type of development. At the time the site was developed it was within the B-3 district, which permitted all types of housing, retail shops, and retail services. In 1995, during the complete rewrite of the zoning ordinance and zoning map, the subject site was rezoned to RMF-35 which was based on its existing use of multi- family residential. The current multi-family structure was developed in 1985 as an apartment building. In 2009 the apartment building was converted to a condominium through the Glenmore Condominium subdivision. This subdivision created 6-residential units, each approximately 850 square feet in area. Since its construction it appears these residential uses have been occupied since. If the master plan amendment and zoning map amendment is approved the property owner would be allowed to fully redevelop the site in accordance with the CN (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district standards and permitted land uses. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Information concerning this petition was sent to the chair of the Sugar House Community Council on June 5, 2020. o The Sugar House Community Council met on the proposed amendment on June 20, 2020 through a Zoom meeting.  Some of the comments included: housing being removed, office not useful to neighborhood, traffic and parking concerns, current enforcement issues, affordable housing, liked the live/work type of neighborhood. • The surrounding property owners within 300’ received an early notification by mail on June 20, 2020. • Public notification for the Planning Commission Hearing was mailed March 11, 2021 to all neighbors within 300’ of the Zoning Map amendment site. • Public notification for the Planning Commission hearing was posted in the newspaper, March 11, 2021. • The property was posted March 12, 2021 noticing the Planning Commission. • The petition was heard by the Planning Commission on March 24, 2021. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a recommendation to deny the proposed amendments to the City Council. Planning Commission (PC) Records: a) PC Agenda of March 24, 2021 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of March 24, 2021 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of March 24, 2021 (Click to Access Report) SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2022 (Amending the zoning of property located at approximately 1583 East Stratford Avenue from RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District to CN Neighborhood Commercial District, and amending the Sugar House Master Plan Future Land Use Map) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at approximately 1583 East Stratford Avenue from RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District to CN Neighborhood Commercial District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00393, and amending the Sugar House Master Plan Future Land Use Map pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00394. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 24, 2021 on an application submitted by Erin Hoffman (“Applicant”) on behalf of the property owner, Stratford Investment Properties, LLC, to rezone property located at 1583 East Stratford Avenue (Tax ID Nos. 16-21-332-001, 16-21-332-002, 16-21-332-003, 16-21-332-004, 16-21- 332-005, 16-21-332-006, and 16-21-332-007) (the “Property”) from RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District to CN Neighborhood Commercial District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00393, and to amend the Sugar House Master Plan Future Land Use Map with respect to those parcels from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Business pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00394; and WHEREAS, at its March 24, 2021 meeting, the planning commission voted to forward a negative recommendation on these petitions to the Salt Lake City Council; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the planning commission’s recommendation, following a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Property identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be and hereby is rezoned from RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District to CN Neighborhood Commercial District. SECTION 2. Amending the Sugar House Master Plan. The Future Land Use Map of the Sugar House Master Plan shall be and hereby is amended to change the future land use designation of the Property identified in Exhibit “A” from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Business. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2022. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2022. Published: ______________. Ordinance amending zoning and MP 1583 E Stratford Ave APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney December 29, 2021 EXHIBIT “A” Legal Description of Property to be Rezoned and Subject to Sugar House Master Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment: 1583 East Stratford Avenue Tax ID No. 16-21-332-007 ALL OF LOTS 799 TO 802, HIGHLAND PARK PL A SUB & THE S 1/2 OF VACATED ALLEY TO THE N. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEG AT SW COR OF LOT 802, HIGHLAND PARK PL A SUB; N 0̊ 01'00" W 131.12 FT; S 89̊ 52'13" E 102.09 FT; S 0̊ 01'00" E 131.12 FT; N 89̊ 52'13" W 102.09 FT TO BEG. 0.31 AC. LESS UNITS. (BEING THE COMMON AREA FOR GLENMARE CONDO). 9739-8636 Tax ID No. 16-21-332-006 UNIT 6, GLENMARE CONDO. 9739-8636 Tax ID No. 16-21-332-005 GLENMARE CONDO 1S 0313 UNIT 5, GLENMARE CONDO. 9739-8636 Tax ID No. 16-21-332-004 GLENMARE CONDO 1S 0313 UNIT 4, GLENMARE CONDO. 9739-8636 Tax ID No. 16-21-332-003 GLENMARE CONDO 1S 0313 UNIT 3, GLENMARE CONDO. 9739-8636 Tax ID No. 16-21-332-002 GLENMARE CONDO 1S 0313 UNIT 2, GLENMARE CONDO. 9739-8636 Tax ID No. 16-21-332-001 GLENMARE CONDO 1S 0313 UNIT 1, GLENMARE CONDO. 9739-8636 EXHIBITS: 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Hearing 3) Mailing List 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 1583 East Stratford Avenue Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendment Project Chronology Located at approximately 1583 East Stratford Avenue PLNPCM2020-00393/00394 May 19, 2020 Zoning Amendment application received by the City. May 20, 2020 Master Plan Amendment application received by the City. May 21, 2020 Petition assigned to and received by Nannette Larsen. June 4, 2020 Housing Mitigation application requested June 5, 2020 Notice of the amendments was provided to the Sugar House Community Council. July 21, 2020 Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendments routed for review August 3, 2020 A number of public comments received through email from the Sugar House Community Council July 14, 2020 Email received regarding concerns site was being used as an office. July 20, 2020 Housing Mitigation application received by the City. March 16, 2021 Public comment received through email regarding concerns over the amendments March 17, 2021 Public comment received through email regarding concerns over the amendments July 20, 2020 Sugar House Community Council meets on requested amendments August 3, 2020 Sugar House Community Council submitted letter to Planning Commission through email. August 11, 2020 Staff recommendation of denial is discussed with applicant. Discussed additional items needed before item is presented to Planning Commission. September 14, 2020 Planning staff met with applicant to discuss the recommendation to Planning Commission on retaining the 6-residential units. October 15, 2020 Email sent to applicant asking how to proceed with the proposal. October 22, 2020 Email received from applicant asking how to proceed to the Planning Commission. October 26, 2020 Voicemail and Email sent explaining needed item to proceed to Planning Commission. Explained housing mitigation calculation and expectations. November 8, 2020 Public Comment received through email regarding concerns over the amendments. November 9, 2020 Received email from applicant stating they are working on updated information February 11, 2021 Received email from applicant concerning Housing Mitigation calculations. I confirmed their understanding of those calculations are correct. February 16, 2021 Received some updated information from applicant and a request to proceed to the Planning Commission with the established recommendation of denial. February 24, 2021 Staff sent email asking for full information initially requested, and confirmed updated information. February 25, 2021 Received information needed in full from applicant. March 1, 2021 Staff emailed applicant the date of the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. March 11, 2021 Newspaper notice posted March 12, 2021 Property posted March 16, 2021 Received supplemental letter from applicant to present to Planning Commission March 19, 2021 Public comment received through email regarding concerns over the amendments March 22, 2021 Staff report posted online and emailed to applicant. March 22, 2021 Public comment received through email regarding concerns over the amendments March 24, 2021 Planning Commission recommended unanimously that City Council deny the proposed amendments. April 1, 2021 Received email from applicant with questions on next steps. April 13, 2021 Met with applicants and discussed next steps, applicant stated they will let me know when they are ready to proceed forward to City Council. June 15, 2021 Met with consultant to the applicant and explained next steps and possible amendments to the application. October 28, 2021 Applicant requested a Pre-submittal meeting with Staff. Discussed steps forward and possible zoning districts for a mixed-use development. November 18, 2021 Updated application submitted by email requested mixed-use redevelopment with a development agreement to maintain 6- residential units. 2. NOTICE OF COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2020-00393 & PLNPCM2020- 00394 1583 East Stratford Avenue Master Plan & Zoning Map Amendment – Salt Lake City received a request from Erin Hoffman with Stratford Investment Properties, the property owner, to amend the Sugar House Master Plan and the zoning map for a property located at approximately 1583 East Stratford Ave. The proposal would rezone the entire property from RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial) and amend the Sugar House Future Land Use Map from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Business. The proposed amendment to the Master Plan & Zoning Map is intended to accommodate an office and residential uses on the site. The subject property is zoned RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential) and is located in Council District 7, represented by Amy Fowler. (Staff contact: Nannette Larsen, 801-535-7645) Case Number: PLNPCM2020- 00393/00394. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Room 315 City & County Building 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Nannette Larsen at 801-535-7645 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at nannette.larsen@slcgov.com. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to attend this hearing. Accommodations may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids. This is an accessible facility. For questions, requests, or additional information, please contact the Planning Division at (801) 535-7757; TDD (801) 535- 6021. 3. MAILING LIST 1583 East Stratford Avenue Mailing List STRATFORD 1588 LLC 1408 E STRATFORD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 MARLO D BANFORD 1495 E 3000 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 CAMERON HOLT; EMILY HOLT (JT) 1502 S WASATCH DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 Current Occupant 1550 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1555 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 WILSON-DEVERAUX LC 1555 E STRATFORD AVE, #100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 PKS TR 1556 E STRATFORD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 Current Occupant 1560 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1560 E STRATFORD AVE, #1 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1560 E STRATFORD AVE, #2 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1560 E STRATFORD AVE, #3 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1560 E STRATFORD AVE, #4 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1560 E STRATFORD AVE, #5 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1560 E STRATFORD AVE, #6 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1560 E STRATFORD AVE, #7 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1560 E STRATFORD AVE, #8 Salt Lake City UT 84106 STRATFORD INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LLC 1567 E STRATFORD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 Current Occupant 1571 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 STRATFORD, LLC 1582 E BRIDLEBROOK CIR HOLLADAY UT 84117 Current Occupant 1583 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1583 E STRATFORD AVE, #1 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1583 E STRATFORD AVE, #2 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1583 E STRATFORD AVE, #3 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1583 E STRATFORD AVE, #4 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1583 E STRATFORD AVE, #5 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1583 E STRATFORD AVE, #6 Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1586 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1588 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1592 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1595 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 JLO PROPERTIES, LLC 1596 E STRATFORD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 Current Occupant 1597 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1599 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 JOSLIN CHRISTENSEN 1602 E STRATFORD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 Current Occupant 1603 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 ALYSSA SCHRACK 1608 E STRATFORD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 Current Occupant 1629 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1632 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1635 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 1636 E STRATFORD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 RHETT EVANS 1857 E HARVARD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 EINAR W SWENSEN (JT) 1946 E ATKIN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 EAST STRATFORD CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 2053C TUSTIN AVE COSTA MESA CA 92627 REESE CONDOMINIUM COMMON AREA MASTER CARD 224 E ENSIGN VISTA DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 RBC LIV TRUST 2265 E FARDOWN AVE HOLLADAY UT 84121 RED BRICK AVE INC 2319 S FOOTHILL DR # 160 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 KEVIN F & DEBRA D KAVANAGH TRUST 03/15/2007 24235 VALLEY ST NEWHALL CA 91321 Current Occupant 2521 S GLENMARE ST Salt Lake City UT 84106 BRADY MCKAY DUNCAN; JULIE NITA DUNCAN (JT) 2522 S GLENMARE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 JAMES F OGDEN 2522 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 RIO-DEAN CROCETTI MARTIN 2525 S GLENMARE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 MICHELLE RASMUSSEN 2526 S GLENMARE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 CHRISTINA STEELE; NATHAN STEELE (JT) 2526 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 Current Occupant 2527 S FILMORE ST Salt Lake City UT 84106 MIHO A UJIIE 2527 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 Current Occupant 2533 S FILMORE ST Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2533 S GLENMARE ST Salt Lake City UT 84106 ZACHARY S DURFEE; MICHAEL D MADSEN; YVONNE C MADSEN (JT) 2533 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 BNK TRUST 2534 S GLENMARE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 J SHANE MATHER; JEANNE J MATHER (JT) 2534 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 Current Occupant 2539 S FILMORE ST Salt Lake City UT 84106 AARON CROWDER 2539 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 DEBBIE YORK; THOMAS YORK 2540 S GLENMARE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 DEBRA G GRIFFITHS 2540 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 ANN M KRUEGER 2541 S GLENMARE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 MND FAM TRUST 2545 S FILMORE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 KORI A WETSEL 2545 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 KAYLEY MILLER; STEPHEN D MILLER (JT) 2546 S GLENMARE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 DANIELLE B PROBST; GERALD G PROBST (JT) 2546 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 DEBRA A MAYO 2549 S GLENMARE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 DOUGLASS R & KATHRYN B HUNTER FAMILY TRUST 11/16/2016 2551 S FILMORE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 KRISTA TODD; ANNA E DEMOTT (JT) 2551 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 CARRIE B MILLER 2552 S GLENMARE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 2552 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 SCOTT C SNOW; KARALEE SNOW (JT) 2579 E SAGE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 Current Occupant 2611 S FILMORE ST Salt Lake City UT 84106 MICHAEL & LYNDA PATRICK FAMILY TRUST 08/30/2018 2617 S FILMORE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 MARIAN DECKER 2624 S GLENMARE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 Current Occupant 2625 S GLENMARE ST Salt Lake City UT 84106 SERGIO COPPA; ELISABETH COPPA (JT) 2625 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 MARIE L BLACK 2626 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 SYDNEY STONER; ERIK KISH-TRIER (JT) 2628 S GLENMARE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 Current Occupant 2629 S GLENMARE ST Salt Lake City UT 84106 JENNIFER JONES; DEREK ROCHE (JT) 2630 S HARTFORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 BRIGHT HORIZONTAL REALTY LLC 2632 E ROBIDOUX RD SANDY UT 84093 SJC MANAGEMENT LLC 3336 E OAK HOLLOW CIR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84093 GIAN J SEXSMITH; CORINNE D SEXSMITH (JT) 3480 S 3650 E MILLCREEK UT 84109 L FAM TRUST 3546 E BROCKBANK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 ECHC HOLDINGS LLC 3793 E PARKVIEW DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 DAVE E RANDLE 4480 S ADONIS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 JEFFREY D EISENBERG 4563 S PEACH ST HOLLADAY UT 84117 CHRISTOPHER CANNON; SUNITA CANNON (JT) 5405 236TH AVE NE REDMOND WA 98053 COOLEY FILMORE LLC 6863 S BELLA VISTA DR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 MATTHEW M COWLEY; JON COWLEY (JT) 7858 S PHEASANT WOOD DR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84093 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLCGOV.COM PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-5357757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Staff Report To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Nannette Larsen, Principal Planner, 801-535-7645 or nannette.larsen@slcgov.com Date: March 24, 2021 Re: PLNPCM2020-00393/00394 – 1583 East Stratford Avenue Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendments Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendments PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1583 East Stratford Avenue PARCEL ID: 1621332001, 1621332002, 1621332003, 1621332004, 1621332005, 1621332006, 1621332007 MASTER PLAN: Sugar House – Medium Density Residential ZONING DISTRICT: RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential) REQUEST: Salt Lake City received a request from Erin Hoffman with Stratford Investment Properties, the property owner, to amend the Sugar House Master Plan and the zoning map for a property located at approximately 1583 East Stratford Ave. The proposal would rezone the entire property from RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial) and amend the Sugar House Future Land Use Map from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Business. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information in this staff report, Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that they deny the proposed zoning map and master plan amendment. ATTACHMENTS: A. Applicant Submittal and Information B. Zoning Map C. Sugar House Future Land Use Map D. Site Photos E. Analysis of Amendment Standards F. RMF-35 Zoning Standards G. CN Zoning Standards H. Department Comments I. Public Process and Comments 3 | Page The current multi-family structure was developed in 1985 as an apartment building. In 2009 the apartment building was converted to a condominium through the Glenmore Condominium subdivision. This subdivision created 6 residential units, each approximately 850 square feet in area. Since its construction it appears these residential uses have been occupied since. The current configuration of the site is similar to other multi-family residential structures constructed at that time in the city. The building is setback an approximate of 27’ from the south and west property lines. This area is landscaped and maintained by the property owner. Parking is permitted and located behind the structure towards the rear of the site. This parking lot includes both covered and uncovered stalls and has accessibility from Glenmare street to the west. The height of the building is approximately 25’. In July of 2020 the site came under enforcement for internal construction in the structure without a building permit. The work being conducted was to combine two residential condominiums into one, a stop work order was issued and the construction on the site ceased until a building permit was obtained. The subject property fronts on Stratford Avenue to the south and Glenmare Avenue to the west. Both Stratford and Glenmare Avenues are listed as local streets in Salt Lake City’s Transportation Master Plan. Local streets provide access to private property to a few number of cars and at low level speeds. The uses around these local streets are generally directed to lower frequency of trips and are directed toward the local neighborhood. The subject sites are surrounded by single family residential houses at a small scale, generally these houses were built in the 1940s. At the intersection of Glenmare and Stratford is a historic commercial node that is well-known in the community. This commercial node includes 7 properties and is occupied by offices, restaurants, financial institutions, and retail shops. Similar commercial nodes are generally located on corner lots. Residential multi-family sites are also located within this commercial node, the sites located on the south west corner of Glenmare and Stratford houses a 6-unit condominium and is zoned RMF-35. To the immediate east of the subject site is also a multi-family 3-unit condominium and is designated RMF-35. The multi-family structures near this intersection have a similar site layout with approximately 20’ landscaped yards with parking located in or behind the structure. The nearest bus line is a north/south line located on 1700 East, approximately two-blocks to the east, this bus runs every half hour. The other transit line is another bus route on 1300 East, another half hour bus frequency. KEY CONSIDERATIONS: The key considerations listed below have been identified through the analysis of the project, neighbor and community input, and department review comments. 1.Compatibility with Master Plans 2.Urban Resiliency 3.RMF-35 and CN Zoning District Comparison and Zoning Compatibility with Adjacent Properties 4 | Page Consideration 1 – Compatibility with Master Plan Policies Sugar House Master Plan The site under review for the Master Plan Future Land Use Map amendment is within the Sugar House Master Plan. This site is presently designated Medium Density Residential. Medium Density Residential allow areas to accommodate for a mix of low-rise housing types – these housing types include four-plex units, garden apartments, townhouses, and live/work units. The density of this designation is between 10 and 20 dwelling units per acre. The Medium Density Residential future land use has a location criteria that includes: • “Proximity to arterial or collector streets; • Proximity to higher design residential areas, mixed-use areas, neighborhood commercial nodes or the urban town center of the Business District; • Proximity to existing and proposed parks and open space; • Prohibit the expansion of non-residential land uses into areas of medium-density residential.” The site’s location and use meet the intent and location criteria of the Medium Density Residential future land use type in that the existing structure located at 1583 E Stratford meets the building height and garden type of apartment development, it is also located within a commercial node at Stratford and Glenmare avenues. These location criteria state that expansion of non-residential land uses into areas of medium-density residential is discouraged, and that it is recommended that these spaces remain residential in some form. The purpose of the Neighborhood Business designation is to provide an area for services, products and attraction on a small scale and within close proximity to residential neighborhoods. This land use designation allows for both residential and small business uses. Within the Sugar House Master Plan is language that identifies the Stratford/Glenmare intersection as a commercial node in the Stratford neighborhood. The intent of the commercial node is to allow adjacent neighborhoods access to services that are within walking distance. It is stated that these Neighborhood Commercial areas, “may consist of four corner sites or isolated parcels”, and the “businesses range from grocery stores to restaurants”. It doesn’t appear that the intent of the commercial node in the Stratford neighborhood, located at the intersection of Stratford Avenue and Glenmare Avenue, is met with the proposed amendment to the Sugar House Future Land Use Map from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Business. The intent of this commercial node is to allow residents access to services that are within walking distance. Because the amendments would result in the conversion of residences to office space rather than services it would not further the purpose of the Stratford commercial node. While the Stratford/Glenmare is identified as a commercial node in the Sugar House Master Plan, it identifies this commercial node as consisting of 4 corner sites or isolated parcels. The existing Future Land Use Map presently identifies isolated parcels on 2 corner properties of the Stratford/Glenmare intersection, therefore the intent of the mater plan commercial node is currently being met. 5 | Page Housing, particularly affordable housing, is addressed in the Sugar House Master Plan as well. The Master Plan encourages increasing opportunities for affordable housing, it also promotes, “Developing and implementing programs that encourage the provision of affordable housing”. The proposed amendments do not meet the goals of the Sugar House Master Plan as it removes housing that is considered to be more affordable from the City’s housing stock. Further, the propose amendments also would remove naturally occurring affordable housing in an area with an already limited number of affordable housing units. The configuration of the site allows for naturally occurring affordable housing, in that the units encompass approximately 900 square feet and the structure is over 30-years old. This is one of the few places in this area of the Sugar House Master Plan where naturally occurring affordable housing is available, this site is generally surrounded by single-family housing on privately owned lots, as shown in figure 2. The Sugar House Master Plan emphasizes the importance of a diversified approach to affordable housing in the community, stating that it is important that affordable housing is evenly distributed through the community and city-wide. Maintaining the City’s housing stock is addressed in the City’s Housing Loss Mitigation Ordinance that was codified in 2012. Housing Loss Mitigation application and calculation is attached to this report as Attachment A. The housing mitigation ordinance goes into effect when a proposal includes the removal of housing within Salt Lake City boundaries. This application is administratively approved by the Director of Community and Neighborhoods and is calculated as the difference between the assessor’s estimate of the building value and the price to replace the building. Growing SLC Growing SLC is a city-wide plan aimed at establishing housing goals and objectives in addressing issues related in Salt Lake City’s growing population and ensure access to affordable housing. The goals within this city-wide plan include “increasing housing opportunities for cost-burdened households” in the City. This includes housing opportunities in neighborhoods that do not have many choices available for cost-burdened families as well as established affordable spaces. The proposed amendments go Figure 2: Surrounding Zoning Map 6 | Page against this stated goal that was approved by City Council, by converting the building from residential to office the affordable units are removed from the city housing stock. Another objective within Growing SLC is to implement life cycle housing in each neighborhood in the city. Life cycle housing is ensuring that housing types are available for different life stages in each neighborhood throughout the City. Life cycle housing requires that a diversity of housing types are provided in each neighborhood. The proposed amendments do not meet this objective as it further reduces multi-family housing in a neighborhood that almost exclusively single-family residential. Plan Salt Lake Finally, Plan Salt Lake, another city-wide plan intended to provide guidance outlines initiatives to support the guide the growth and changes as they occur in the City. Plan Salt Lake, in addition to the Sugar House Master Plan, also has goals relating to providing differing housing types throughout the city. “Ensure access to affordable housing citywide (including rental and very low income).” “Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the City, providing the basic human need for safety and responding to changing demographics.” The proposed amendments to the Sugar House Master Plan to facilitate the removal of 6 residential units do not meet the purpose or intent of the Sugar House Master Plan, nor do the amendments meet the initiatives of Plan Salt Lake. The existing multi-family residential units at 1583 E Stratford are one of the very few multi-family uses available in the neighborhood that is mostly single-family. The intent of the Master Plan at the intersection of Stratford and Glenmare is to provide an area for services or retail within walking distance of the surrounding residential neighborhood. The conversion of residential to office would reduce this environment as office types of uses generally are not limited to the community but rather service a larger area and would encourage commuting into a residential neighborhood. Consideration 2 – Urban Resiliency and Diversity of Housing Another significant consideration for any proposed Master Plan or Zoning map amendment is whether the proposed amendments furthers the resiliency of the community. One attribute of resilient places is a diversity of housing. One study, funded by the National Science Foundation, found that allowing for a diversity of housing types promotes stability in the community as shifts in the market impact affordability of housing, providing a mix of housing ensures that housing will remain available and maintained within the community. The American Planning Association in their Policy Guide on Housing notes that a diversity of housing in neighborhoods also helps assure the viability of communities as it allows for housing of all life phases, many different income types, and different lifestyles. Encouraging housing for all life phases allows residents the chance to remain within their community and near people with whom they are familiar as their need for housing changes. Diversity in housing also allows for different income types so that as trends in the market fluctuate housing demand is more stable in the community. Attainable and affordable housing is essential to preserve as demand for housing in these communities increases. Ensuring that there is attainable or affordable housing options in every community allows low-income households the opportunity to live in areas that are established or developing towards 9 | Page While neither zoning district landscape standards are presently being met, the site is able to be updated so that it is in complying whether the proposed amendments to the master plan or zoning map are approved or denied. Use The applicant is proposing to convert the existing multi-family residential structure to office. The RMF- 35 district permits residential multi-family as a permitted use, residential multi-family is not permitted in the CN district however. Office is allowed in the CN district as well as mixed use development (commercial/residential). Because RMF-35 is a residential district, generally only residential or uses related to residential are permitted in this district. CN allows a greater range of uses that are oriented to the surrounding residential uses. DISCUSSION: It is necessary that the purpose and goals of the Sugar House Master Plan are shown to be met prior to any amendment to the master plan and zoning map. It is also necessary that a rezone of the site complies with the requirements of the proposed zoning district. It was found during the review of the Key Considerations of the proposed amendments that the conversion from multi-family residential to office is contrary to the intended purpose and goals of Salt Lake City’s master plan and large area plans. The intent of the Medium Density Residential designation and the commercial node near the intersection of Stratford and Glenmare Avenues are presently being met and the requested amendment would disrupt this. Further, it was found that reducing the available housing types in this Sugar House community would diminish the resilient nature of this area and reduce the number of affordable residential units within the City. Finally, approval of the Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendments would create a noncompliance that is not already existing on the site. The maximum setback in the CN district is 25’, the structure exceeds this by 2’ at 27’ front and corner side yard setback. The RMF-35 does not limit the maximum setback so keeping the subject property within the RMF-35 zoning district would allow the site to stay in compliance. While the proposed amendments to the Master Plan and Zoning Map may bring additional jobs into the City, the goals, initiatives, and purpose of the Sugar House Master Plan and the city-wide plan, Plan Salt Lake, have been found are not being met. NEXT STEPS: A recommendation of approval or denial by the Planning Commission will result in the proposed Master Plan and Zoning Map amendment to be sent to the City Council for a final decision. Master Plan and Zone Amendment Approval If the master plan and zone amendments are approved, the applicant will be permitted to build or operate any use allowed in the CN, Neighborhood Commercial, zone on the site. A list of uses allowed in the zone is included in this report as Attachment G. The developer will need to obtain a building permit or business license for any new development or new business and will need to comply with all applicable zoning standards. Also, prior to the elimination the Housing Loss Mitigation Report will need to be approved and the corresponding fees paid to the City. 10 | Page Master Plan and Zone Amendment Denial If the master plan and zone amendments are denied, the property will remain zoned RMF-35, Moderate Density Residential. This zone allows the continued use of residential, whether that is residential rental units or individually owned. 11 | Page ATTACHMENT A: APPLICANT SUBMITTAL AND INFORMATION 1 106139586.1 0069070-00003 MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION ATTACHMENT 1583 East Stratford Ave 1. Describe the proposed master plan amendment. We are the owners of the property located at 1583 East Stratford Ave, SLC, UT 84106 (the “Property). We intend to convert the building on the Property from a residential condominium six-plex building into a commercial office building. We are therefore applying to change the Land Use Map in the Sugar House Master Plan to identify the Property as Neighborhood Business. This is a much better use of the Property given its location and the use of the neighboring properties, and fits well with recent development in Sugarhouse to create a livable walking community. 2. A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment. Our plan is to maintain the structure currently on the Property but upgrade and convert the building to be used as an office space. We would take the old, run-down building that has collected a junkyard behind it and make it into something the community and city could be proud of. This would include exterior improvements to the aesthetics of the building (paint, landscaping, and structural repair) as well as reconfiguring and upgrading the interior of the existing structure to meet building codes and exceed environmental and efficiency standards. This requires the Land Use Map to change the use of the Property to Neighborhood Business. 3. Declare why the present master plan requires amending. This Property is an ideal location for commercial use, as currently outlined in the master plan. The properties to the east, west, and south of the Property are currently identified as Neighborhood Business. The Property is located on the corner of a prominent 4-way intersection. It is a better and higher use of the Property to identify it as Neighborhood Business. The Sugar House Master Plan specifically calls out this intersection as an ideal location for Neighborhood Commercial use: “Neighborhood Commercial areas may consist of four corner sites or isolated parcels. The businesses range from grocery stores to restaurants. Some neighborhood business centers identified in the land use plan are at 2100 South and 2100 East, Stratford Avenue and Glenmare Street, 2700 South and 2000 East, and portions of 2300 East and Parley's Way. The community supports a Citywide effort to revise and strengthen the Neighborhood Commercial zoning district.” Sugar House Master Plan, Pg. 6. Changing this Property to Neighborhood Business on the Land Use Map unifies the use of the intersection and is supported in the area’s master plan. Recent development in Sugarhouse has established a unified neighborhood that includes offices, shopping, restaurants, and an upgraded 2 106139586.1 0069070-00003 trail system within a residential area to encourage social gatherings and reduce transportation impact. Many of the employees at the existing adjacent businesses walk or ride bikes to work, reducing vehicular traffic and environmental impact. Offering additional walkable office space reduces after-hours neighborhood noise and impact and adds an attractive, efficient, and environmentally friendly building to a revitalized and thriving area. The added commercial space, while a small addition to a growing area, would offer patronage of the adjacent shops, restaurants, and salons, ensuring the intersection’s small business success for years to come. 4. Is the request amending the Land Use Map? If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed. 16213320010000, 16213320020000, 16213320030000, 16213320040000, 16213320050000, 16213320060000, and 16213320070000 1 106139585.1 0069070-00003 ZONING AMENDMENT APPLICATION ATTACHMENT 1583 East Stratford Ave 1. A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment. We are the owners of the property located at 1583 East Stratford Ave, SLC, UT 84106 (the “Property). We intend to convert the building on the Property from a residential six-plex condominium building into a commercial office building. We are therefore applying to change the zoning of the Property from Moderate Density Multifamily Residential (“RMF-35”) to Neighborhood Commercial (“CN”). This is a much better use of the Property given its location and the use of the neighboring properties, and fits well with recent development in Sugarhouse to create a livable walking community. 2. A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned. Our plan is to maintain the structure currently on the Property but upgrade and convert the building to be used as an office space. We would take the old, run-down building that has collected a junkyard behind it and make it into something the community and city could be proud of. This would include exterior improvements to the aesthetics of the building (paint, landscaping, and structural repair) as well as reconfiguring and upgrading the interior of the existing structure to meet building codes and exceed environmental and efficiency standards.. This requires the zoning on the Property to be changed to CN. 3. List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area. This Property is an ideal location for commercial use, as currently outlined in the master plan. The properties to the east, west, and south of the Property are currently zoned CN. Changing the zoning of the Property to CN would be more in line with the uses of the neighboring properties and create a centralized neighborhood commercial location. The Sugar House Master Plan specifically calls out this intersection as an ideal location for CN zoning: “Neighborhood Commercial areas may consist of four corner sites or isolated parcels. The businesses range from grocery stores to restaurants. Some neighborhood business centers identified in the land use plan are at 2100 South and 2100 East, Stratford Avenue and Glenmare Street, 2700 South and 2000 East, and portions of 2300 East and Parley's Way. The community supports a Citywide effort to revise and strengthen the Neighborhood Commercial zoning district.” Sugar House Master Plan, Pg. 6. Changing this Property to Neighborhood Commercial zoning unifies the use of the intersection and is supported in the neighborhood’s master plan. Recent development in Sugarhouse has 2 106139585.1 0069070-00003 established a unified neighborhood that includes offices, shopping, restaurants, and an upgraded trail system within a residential area to encourage social gatherings and reduce transportation impact. Many of the employees at the existing adjacent businesses walk or ride bikes to work, reducing vehicular traffic and environmental impact. Offering additional walkable office space reduces after-hours neighborhood noise and impact and adds an attractive, efficient, and environmentally friendly building to a revitalized and thriving area. The added commercial space, while a small addition to a growing area, would offer patronage of the adjacent shops, restaurants, and salons, ensuring the intersection’s small business success for years to come. 4. Is the request amending the Zoning Map? If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed. 16213320010000, 16213320020000, 16213320030000, 16213320040000, 16213320050000, 16213320060000, and 16213320070000 Salt Lake City Planning Division March 16, 2021 Page 2 110057061.1 0069070-00003 is identified as a neighborhood business center. Moreover, the Master Plan states that “The Stratford Avenue and Glenmare Street neighborhood shopping node is an example of a center that is underutilized.” 2. Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. The “zoning ordinance” refers to Title 21A of the Code. The overall purpose of the zoning ordinance is “to promote the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of Salt Lake City, to implement the adopted plans of the City, and to carry out the purposes of the Municipal Land Use Development and Management Act.” Code § 21A.02.030. The purpose of the CN Zone is “to provide for small scale, low intensity commercial uses that can be located within and serve residential neighborhoods.” Code § 21A.26.020. But for other commercial uses on the same intersection, as further described below, the Property is within a residential neighborhood and is ideally positioned to provide just such small scale, low intensity commercial use. The conversion of the existing residential units to commercial offices would have the same intensity of use as previously existed, but would provide walkable office space for the neighborhood. Commercial use of the Property would also promote convenience for local residents and would help establish and support this intersection as a thriving commercial node. 3. The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent properties. Both the northwest and southeast corners of this intersection are already within the CN Zone and used for commercial purposes. The property to the east is also within the CN Zone. Rezoning the Property to the CN Zone would draw additional local residents to those existing businesses and would offer patronage to those businesses from individuals working at the Property. This would also provide walkable office space for the neighborhood. Allowing commercial use on the Property would promote this intersection as a viable neighborhood commercial center. 4. Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. There are no applicable overlay zoning districts. 5. The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection. The existing building will undergo some updates and improvements, but the structure, and need for public facilities and services, will remain the same. Analysis of these five items demonstrates that the Property is appropriate for the CN Zone. We therefore respectfully request that the Applications be approved. 13 | Page ATTACHMENT C: SUGAR HOUSE FUTURE LAND USE MAP 14 | Page ATTACHMENT D: SITE PHOTOS View of Site, looking north/east on Stratford Avenue View of Site, looking east on Glenmare Avenue 15 | Page View of Site, looking south/west on Denver Street. View of Site, looking south/east on Glenmare Avenue ATTACHMENT F: RMF-35 ZONING STANDARDS 21A.24.130: RMF-35 MODERATE DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: A.Purpose Statement: The purpose of the RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District is to provide an environment suitable for a variety of moderate density housing types, incl uding single-family, two-family, and multi-family dwellings with a maximum height of thirty five feet (35 '). This district is appropriate in areas where the applicable Master Plan policies recommend a density ofless than thirty (30)dwelling units per acre. This district incl udes other uses that are typically found in a multi-family residential neighborhood of this density for the purpose of serving the neighborhood. Uses are intended to be compatible with the existing scale and intensity of the ne ighborhood. The standards for the district are intended to provide for safe and comfortable places to live and play, promote sustainable and comp atible development patterns and to preserve the existing character of the neighborhood. B.Uses: Uses in the RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District, as specified in section 21A.33.020. "Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Residential Districts", of this title, are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in section 21 A 24 010 of this chapter and this section. C.Minimum Lot Area And Lot Widtl1: The minimum lot areas and lot widths required in this district are as follows: Land Use Minim1un Lot Area Mininnun Lot Width Multi-family dwellings (3 through n units) 9,000 square feet' 8ofeet Multi-family dwellings (12 or more units) 26,000 square feetl 8ofeet Municipal se1vice uses, including City No minimum No minimum utility uses and police and fire stations Natural open sp ace and conse 1vation Nomininmm No minimum areas, public and private Places of worship less than 4 acres in size 12,000 square feet 14ofeet Public pedest1ian pathways, trails and No mininmm No minin1um greenways Public/private utility transmission wi res, No minimum No minin1um lines, pipes and poles Single-family attaclied dwellings (3 or 3,000 square feet per unit Inte1ior: 22 feet more) Corner: 32 feet Single-family detached dwellings 5,000 square feet 5ofeet Twin home dwellings 4,000 square feet per unit 25 feet Two-family dwellings 8,000 square feet 50 feet Utility substations and buildings 5,000 square feet 5ofeet Other permitted or conditiona l uses as 5,000 square feet 5ofeet listed in section 21.A.33.020 of this title 181 Page 19 | Page Qualifying provisions: 1. 9,000 square feet for 3 units, plus 2,000 square feet for each additional dwelling unit up to and including 11 units. 26,000 square feet for 12 units, plus 1,000 square feet for each additional dwelling unit up to 1 acre. For developments greater than 1 acre, 1,500 square feet for each dwelling unit is required. D. Maximum Building Height: The maximum building height permitted in this district is thirty five feet (35'). E. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Front Yard: Twenty feet (20'). 2. Corner Side Yard: Ten feet (10'). 3. Interior Side Yard: a. Single-family detached and two-family dwellings: (1) Interior lots: Four feet (4') on one side and ten feet (10') on the other. (2) Corner lots: Four feet (4'). b. Single-family attached: No yard is required, however, if one is provided it shall not be less than four feet (4'). c. Twin home dwelling: No yard is required along one side lot line while a ten foot (10') yard is required on the other. d. Multi-family dwellings: (1) Interior lots: Side yard shall be at least ten feet (10'). e. All other permitted and conditional uses: Ten feet (10') on each side. 4. Rear Yard: Twenty five percent (25%) of the lot depth, but not less than twenty feet (20') and need not exceed twenty five feet (25'). 5. Accessory Buildings And Structures In Yards: Accessory buildings and structures may be located in a required yard subject to section 21A.36.020, table 21A.36.020B, "Obstructions In Required Yards", of this title. 6. Existing Yards: For buildings legally existing on April 12, 1995, the required yard shall be no greater than the established setback line of the existing building unless the proposed yard encroachment is to accommodate additional units. New principal buildings must conform to current yard area requirements, unless the new principal two-family dwelling or twin home has legal conforming status as outlined in section 21A.38.070 of this title. F. Required Landscape Yards: The front yard, corner side and, for interior multi-family lots, one of the interior side yards shall be maintained as landscape yards. G. Maximum Building Coverage: 1. Single-Family Detached: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed forty five percent (45%) of the lot area. 2. Single-Family Attached Dwellings: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. 3. Two-Family And Twin Home Dwellings: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot area. 4. Multi-Family Dwellings: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. 5. Existing Dwellings: For dwellings existing on April 12, 1995, the coverage of such existing buildings shall be considered legally conforming. 6. Nonresidential Land Uses: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. 20 | Page ATTACHMENT G: CN ZONING STANDARDS 21A.26.020: CN NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT: A.Purpose Statement: The CN Neighborhood Commercial District is intended to provide for small scale, low intensity commercial uses that can be located within and serve residential neighborhoods. This district is appropriate in areas where supported by applicable master plans and along local streets that are served by multiple transportation modes, such as pedestrian, bicycle, transit and automobiles. The standards for the district are intended to reinforce the historic scale and ambiance of traditional neighborhood retail that is oriented toward the pedestrian while ensuring adequate transit and automobile access. Uses are restricted in size to promote local orientation and to limit adverse impacts on nearby residential areas. B.Uses: Uses in the CN Neighborhood Commercial District as specified in section 21A.33.030, "Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Commercial Districts", of this title, are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in section 21A.26.010 of this chapter and this section. C.Planned Development Review: Planned developments, which meet the intent of the ordinance, but not the specific design criteria outlined in the following subsections, may be approved by the Planning Commission pursuant to the provisions of chapter 21A.55 of this title. D.Lot Size Requirements: No minimum lot area or lot width is required. No lot shall be larger than sixteen thousand five hundred (16,500) square feet. E.Maximum District Size: The total area of a contiguously mapped CN District shall not exceed ninety thousand (90,000) square feet, excluding all land in public rights-of-way. F.Minimum Yard Requirements:1.Front Or Corner Side Yard: A fifteen foot (15') minimum front or corner side yard shall be required. Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized as design review, subject to the requirements of chapter 21A.59 of this title, and the review and approval of the Planning Commission. 2.Interior Side Yard: None required.3.Rear Yard: Ten feet (10').4.Buffer Yards: Any lot abutting a lot in a Residential District shall conform to the buffer yard requirements of chapter 21A.48 of this title. 5.Accessory Buildings And Structures In Yards: Accessory buildings and structures may be located in a required yard subject to section 21A.36.020, table 21A.36.020B of this title. 6.Maximum Setback: A maximum setback is required for at least sixty five percent (65%) of the building facade. The maximum setback is twenty five feet (25'). Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of chapter 21A.59 of this title, and the review and approval of the Planning Commission. The Planning Director, in consultation with the Transportation Director, may modify this requirement if the adjacent public sidewalk 21 | Page is substandard and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The Planning Director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansion, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than fifty percent (50%) if the Planning Director finds the following: a.The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture. b.The addition is not part of a series of incremental additions intended to subvert the intent of the ordinance. Appeal of administrative decision is to the Planning Commission. 7.Parking Setback: Surface parking lots within an interior side yard shall maintain a thirty foot (30') landscape setback from the front property line or be located behind the primary structure. Parking structures shall maintain a forty five foot (45') minimum setback from a front or corner side yard property line or be located behind the primary structure. There are no minimum or maximum setback restrictions on underground parking. The Planning Director may modify or waive this requirement if the Planning Director finds the following: a.The parking is compatible with the architecture/design of the original structure or the surrounding architecture. b.The parking is not part of a series of incremental additions intended to subvert the intent of the ordinance. c.The horizontal landscaping is replaced with vertical screening in the form of berms, plant materials, architectural features, fencing and/or other forms of screening. d.The landscaped setback is consistent with the surrounding neighborhoodcharacter. e.The overall project is consistent with section 21A.59.050 of this title.Appeal of administrative decision is to the Planning Commission. G.Landscape Yard Requirements: Front and corner side yards shall be maintained as landscape yards. Subject to site plan review approval, part or all of the landscape yard may be a patio or plaza, conforming to the requirements of section 21A.48.090 of this title. H.Maximum Height: Twenty five feet (25'). (Ord. 14-19, 2019: Ord. 12-17, 2017) 23 | Page ATTACHMENT I: PUBLIC PROCESS AND COMMENTS Public Notice, Meetings, Comments The following is a list of public meetings that have been held, and other public input opportunities, related to the proposed project: PUBLIC PROCESS AND INPUT Timeline • The application for a rezone was submitted on May 19, 2020. • The application for a master plan amendment was submitted on May 20, 2020. • Notice of the proposal, and request for input, was provided to the Sugar House Community Council on June 5, 2020. o The Sugar House Community Council met and discussed the proposed amendments on July 20, 2020 through a Zoom Meeting.  Some of the comments included: housing being removed, office no useful to neighborhood, traffic and parking concerns, current enforcement issues, affordable housing, liked the live/work type of neighborhood. • Early Notification mailings were sent out on July 20, 2020 to property owners and residents within 300’ of all four corners of the project site. • Public notice of the Planning Commission hearing was mailed to property owners and residents within 300’ of the subject site. • A public notice sign was posted on both frontages of the subject site on March 11, 2021. • Public comments were received through email before the writing of this report. They are attached to this report. From:Judi Short To:Larsen, Nannette Subject:(EXTERNAL) Fwd: 1583 E Stratford Avenue Date:Monday, August 3, 2020 1:30:34 PM I just got this, so it isn't in what I sent you yesterday, thought I would start a second COMMENTS document and see if we get more. I thought I would send this to you now, since it is one of the few that thinks the rezone is a good idea. udi ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: David Fernandez Date: Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 3:32 PM Subject: 1583 E Stratford Avenue To: From: David Fernandez <2685 S Hartford> Subject: 1583 Stratford Ave Message Body: I virtually attended the Sugar House Council meeting on the property located at 1583 Stratford Ave on 7/20/20. I strongly approve of changing the zoning to CN (Neighborhood Commercial) to allow the owner to convert the existing building to additional office space. The Joint Orthography is exactly the business that fits in this neighborhood. A small low impact, non-obtrusive business that employees highly educated and community oriented personnel. They have been part of this community for quite some time. With the recent Covid-19 stay at home order it has demonstrated that the amount of personnel parking in the area was reduced. Upgrading the existing horrible apartment complex even a little will enhance the neighborhood and provide them even more business parking. It was suggested during the meeting that a variance be granted for the upgrade to prevent the owner from flipping the property without another chance to bring it before the City Council. However, since the Sugar House Master Plan does not allow this type of variance, I support the change of zoning to neighborhood commercial. Even though the owners and the Sugar House Council may not have followed all the codes and regulations according to Hoyle, in the end I trust the owner’s to do the right thing rather than any legislation, enforcement, punitive actions, or codes. -- This e-mail was sent from a contact form on Sugar House Community Council (https://www.sugarhousecouncil.org) -- Judi Short 1 Larsen, Nannette From:Debbie Mayo Sent:Wednesday, March 17, 2021 2:48 PM To:Larsen, Nannette Cc:Tim Krueger; Brenda Koga; Judi Short Subject:(EXTERNAL) 83 East Stratford Ave conversion of residential property to commercial with a request to rezone to CN APN: 16-21-332-001 thru 007; PLNPCM2020-00393; PLNPCM2020-00394 Hello Nanette, I have been copied on all the emails that have been going around about the above rezone at 1583 E. Stratford. I would like to make a comment to be included in your report to the Planning Commission. I live at 2549 S. Glenmare St. and share a property line with this apartment building. I have serious concerns about this lot getting rezoned to commercial. The owners of this property have already built a new large multistory building on their property across the street on the opposite corner of Stratford and Glenmare. This building went right up to the property line of the home next door to it and has completely blocked that home off. That homeowner looks from both her home and her yard into this commercial building. I am afraid that if the apartment building is rezoned commercial, the same thing will happen to me. When I bought my home 20 years ago, the apartment building was already there and they have been fine neighbors for the most part and no bother. If there was a commercial business on that property, I would never have purchased my home. This is a residential neighborhood with with a few small businesses on that intersection. They are neighborhood friendly businesses, a hair salon, a small restaurant and so on. Things that are a good and useful addition to a neighborhood. Total Joint Orthopedics is not a good and useful addition to our neighborhood. They are a design, manufacturing and sales business that has no business being in a residential neighborhood. No one in our neighborhood is able to utilize their products or services. Since Erin Hoffman has made this application for the rezone, she has proven time and again to disregard the entire process. Construction started almost immediately and has continued to the point where now they have moved in and are occupying the 2 lower units (which have now been combined into one) of the apartment building. All of this was despite not having a work permit, despite have a work stop order placed and despite not having a business license or this zoning change in place. I have documented this process and have sent photos to Judi Short, Amy Fowler and Les Koch. At one point I went over and spoke with the man who did most of the construction work. He told me the 2 lower units were being remodeled to be one large 4 bedroom/4 bathroom apartment. As I glanced around this was obviously not the case at the time and I was quite surprised he would tell me that. It is definitely not the case today. I took a photo this morning that clearly shows it is not an apartment and that it is being moved into as a business. Another of my concerns is that if the zoning change is approved, Erin will evict the tenants on the upper floors and covert the entire building into an expansion of Total Joint Orthopedics. I have actually had the thought that she might do that whether she gets the zoning change approved or not as she seems to think rules do not apply to her. Sugarhouse is being overrun with new apartment buildings these days. I should think it is not the best use of land to convert an existing apartment building into office and manufacturing space, especially in a residential neighborhood. There is not enough parking space to support this building being converted totally to a business. Currently there are parking issues with the existing Total Joint Orthopedics. They don't begin to have enough parking space for all their employees and they park all up and down the adjacent residential streets. If they continue to grow their business, they will have more commercial trucks coming on our streets as well. There are a lot of kids in this neighborhood that play in front yards. They frequently run over to friend's houses so increased truck traffic would be a danger to them. Again, I can't say enough that this type of business does not belong in a residential neighborhood. I would encourage the Planning Commission members to please deny this application for a zoning change. I am planning on attending the Planning Commission meeting on March 24th.. Regards, 1 Larsen, Nannette From:Larsen, Nannette Sent:Monday, August 3, 2020 1:54 PM To:'Judi Short' Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: 1583 E Stratford Avenue Thank you Judi,    I will be sure to include all of these comments in my report to the Planning Commission.    Best,  Nan    From: Judi Short <judi.short@gmail.com>   Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 1:30 PM  To: Larsen, Nannette <Nannette.Larsen@slcgov.com>  Subject: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: 1583 E Stratford Avenue    I just got this, so it isn't in what I sent you yesterday, thought I would start a second COMMENTS document  and see if we get more.  I thought I would send this to you now, since it is one of the few that thinks the rezone is a good idea.  udi    ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: David Fernandez   Date: Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 3:32 PM  Subject: 1583 E Stratford Avenue  To:       From: David Fernandez ><2685 S Hartford>  Subject: 1583 Stratford Ave  Message Body:  I virtually attended the Sugar House Council meeting on the property located at 1583 Stratford Ave on 7/20/20.  I  strongly approve of changing the zoning to CN (Neighborhood Commercial) to allow the owner to convert the existing  building to additional office space.  The Joint Orthography is exactly the business that fits in this neighborhood.  A small  low impact, non‐obtrusive business that employees highly educated and community oriented personnel.  They have  been part of this community for quite some time.  With the recent Covid‐19 stay at home order it has demonstrated that  the amount of personnel parking in the area was reduced.  Upgrading the existing horrible apartment complex even a  little will enhance the neighborhood and provide them even more business parking. It was suggested during the meeting  that a variance be granted for the upgrade to prevent the owner from flipping the property without another chance to  bring it before the City Council.  However, since the Sugar House Master Plan does not allow this type of variance, I  support the change of zoning to neighborhood commercial. Even though the owners and the Sugar House Council may  not have followed all the codes and regulations according to Hoyle, in the end I trust the owner’s to do the right thing  rather than any legislation, enforcement, punitive actions, or codes.        ‐‐   This e‐mail was sent from a contact form on Sugar House Community Council (https://www.sugarhousecouncil.org)  2       ‐‐   Judi Short      ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 1/26/2022 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 1/26/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 1/26/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Public Utilities Advisory Committee STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan jessi.eagan@slcgov.com Board Appointment Recommendation: Public Utilities Advisory DOCUMENT TYPE: Committee. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Alexander Lovell as a member of the Public Utilities Advisory Committee. / ( ) ,,,,,,,11111 ,,.,,,' ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 January 26, 2022 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Dugan, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Public Utilities Advisory Committee. Alexander Lovell - to be appointed for a four year term ending January 19, 2026, starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File .. Ji. .. '• / ;\ trfj \ .. l ,,,,, u111 ,v·' ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 1/26/2022 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 1/26/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 1/26/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Public Utilities Advisory Committee. STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan jessi.eagan@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Public Utilities Advisory Committee. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Kathryn Floor as a member of the Public Utilities Advisory Committee. ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 January 26, 2022 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Dugan, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Public Utilities Advisory Committee. Kathryn Floor - to be appointed for a four year term ending January 19, 2026, starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 1/26/2022 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 1/26/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 1/26/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Reappointment Recommendation: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan jessi.eagan@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Reappointment Recommendation: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. . RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and reappoint Jenny Hewson as a member of the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. / ( ) ,,,,,,,11111 ,,.,,,' ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 January 26, 2022 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Dugan, Listed below is my recommendation for membership reappointment to the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. Jenny Hewson - to be reappointed for a three year term starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this reappointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File .. Ji. .. '• / ;\ trfj \ .. l ,,,,, u111 ,v·' ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 1/26/2022 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 1/26/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 1/26/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Reappointment Recommendation: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan jessi.eagan@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Reappointment Recommendation: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. . RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and reappoint Samantha Smith as a member of the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. / ( ) ,,,,,,,11111 ,,.,,,' ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 January 26, 2022 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Dugan, Listed below is my recommendation for membership reappointment to the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. Samantha Finch - to be reappointed for a three year term starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this reappointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File .. Ji. .. '• / ;\ trfj \ .. l ,,,,, u111 ,v·' Date/Time Opened Popular Topic Contact Name Description 2/9/2022 14:53 Liesa Covey Hello,As a manager at a store in the Gateway mall,I have gotten very used to the homeless situation down in this area.I have been punched by them,yelled at by them on a daily basis,and I have our mall's security on speed dial so I can receive back up when dealing with homeless people at my store.More and more I am becoming a babysitter where I have to watch them come in and steal things.Depending on the size of them determines if I confront them or not.I am not about to go up against anybody on drugs who is bigger than me.Unfortunately the mall security really can't do much except kick them out after they've continuously stolen from us.And then they just disappear onto 500 W where they can't be touched by the security.And then they come back the next day,only to have the same situation happen.I live right above the Gateway mall at 55 5 500 W at the Altitude on Fifth.Despite our new locks on the front doors,I have run into a lot of homeless people in our apartment.Just this week I caught a homeless woman on drugs looking into my patio and my neighbors patios.After talking to my neighbor,my neighbor told me that she had caught her on camera going through her trash and had seen her hiding in the stairways.But,unfortunately the security can only kick them out and then the homeless find their way back in only hours later.Last night,not only did!see the same woman at my work,who I promptly kicked out,but then she was in the stairway again.Not only that,there was another homeless person sleeping on patios by our fire escape.If the homeless can't get in through the front door,I have seen them roll under the garage gate into the garage below.I have had my car broken into and I know quite a few people who have also had their cars broken into.I understand that this isn't an easy fix.But it's getting to the point where my neighbors and I are going to start calling the police-which I think they have bigger fish to fry than deal with homeless junkies who are trespassing and causing havoc at local businesses.We really don't want to call the police if we don't have to because they have other things they should be doing.But it's getting really bad here at the Gateway,and unfortunately we don't have the resources to do much to maintain our safety.I've told my coworkers to have the mall security walk them home if they need it,I never walk alone by myself here at night,and I always carry pepper spray throughout my apartment complex just in case I run into anyone who doesn't live here.It's very unsettling to have my patio and my apartment be open to anybody who can walk up.I will be passing along your email address to my neighbors and a few fellow business owners as we all have had our own accounts with the homeless and are getting to our wit's end. 2/14/2022 16:29 Casey Mcdonough Everyone,I am writing to you regarding the attached article about the hesitancy for some to get vaccines.I found it not only very interesting,but one of the best in depth looks into the psychological and other reasons some are avoidant and anxious to get the COVID or other vaccines.I find a quote used in the article where Rishi Manchanda said that"...public health moves at the speed of trust..."I believe trust,especially in our representative form of government;is earned. Earned with transparency,openness,and a constant and never-ending willingness to speak with everyone on those terms.I have heard more than once from those who are for all vaccinations,that those who don't vaccinate or mask therefore deserve to die if they get COVID.I can't think of a more unempathetic and divisive view to hold than that and when I hear it I can't help but remember similar statements made during the AIDS epidemic.I do not believe we can continue to minimize or demonize those who take issue with vaccinations,mask mandates,or anything else regarding public health;regardless of which side of the argument they are on.Thank you for your time and consideration,and I have to say again,I can't encourage you enough to read this article.Article Online-Why Is There So Much Vaccine Hesitancy?-Tablet Magazine<https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/needle-points-vaccinations-chapter one>Author Reading Article-Needle Points I Norman Doidge I The Jordan B.Peterson Podcast 54:E79-Bing video <https://www.bi ng.com/videos/search?q=jorda n+peterson+need lepoints+norms n&docid=20696661644175&mid=0580 3210D0776DA0A02305803210D0776DA0A023&view=detail&FORM=VIRE>You can also listen to the author read the article on episode 79.of The Jordan B.Peterson Podcast.Casey O'Brien McDonough 801-971-9053 yalpyesacnac@hotmail.com 2/14/2022 17:31 Robert Williams Constituent called in to express gratitude for for the garden near Jordan River in the Fairpark neighborhood.They state that there are very diverse people there and that they have had the oportunity to volunteer there. 2/15/2022 9:52 Michael Mejia Dear Councilmember Valdemoros,My name is Michael Mejia and I serve on the Salt Lake Art+Design Board for District 4.I am writing you today to ask for your support of the Arts Council's request for additional staff positions in Budget Amendment 6.I understand that many Departments within Salt Lake City are struggling with needs for staffing support, and you have many staffing requests in this budget amendment for consideration.It is a challenging position to be in and I appreciate your consideration and service to our community.*Many of the Arts Council's programs have grown over the last few years including the creation of the Living Legacy Video Series and Finch Lane Flash Projects,maintenance responsibilities for the newly passed percent for art ordinance,new City Arts Grants categories and an ever increasing volume of requests and grants,participation in multiple City stakeholder and advisory groups and initiatives such as Fleet Block and Gentrification Mitigation,and increased efforts with equity,inclusion,and community outreach.More simply put,the Arts Council staff have been asked to do more with flat staffing since 2012.*In 2019 the Mayor's Advisor on Arts&Culture full-time position was eliminated with all of the project and policy responsibilities of this position being added to the responsibilities of the Arts Council's Executive Director as well as management of the Cultural Core project. *The Arts Council leverages City investment by raising 30-35%of all operating and programming expenses from sources outside of the City budget.*Additional staff would also serve the purpose of stabilizing qualifying expenditures of the organization to leverage critical grant funds from the prestigious Salt Lake County Zoo,Arts,and Parks grant program.* The Arts Council works diligently to continue to find additional funding opportunities through grant writing and development.One recent success is that the Arts Council is just one of 66 awardees nationally and the only awardee in the state of Utah to receive ARPA funding to sub-grant to our community from the National Endowment for the Arts.The $500,000 in funding will go directly to our local artists and arts organizations aiding in a more swift and equitable economic recovery than what might have otherwise been possible.This increases the City's impact.As outlined in the Mayor's plan from 2020 to 2021,we have been strategically working on the"stabilization of the structure and funding of the Arts Council."Part of that work has included staff working diligently to increase the visibility and impact of the arts and culture sector of Salt Lake.I would appreciate your support for this critical public service that provides so many community benefits from a small and mighty team.Our city is a beacon for creative vitality,economic vibrancy,and inclusive communities.Arts Council programs represent the best of what our city has to offer residents and visitors alike. I am available should you have any questions about my comments above at 706.346.3519 or mfmejia@gmail.com.All best and stay well—Michael Mejia Associate Professor Department of English University of Utah