03/01/2022 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
REVISED AGENDA
FORMAL MEETING
March 1,2022 Tuesday 7:00 PM
Council Chambers
451 South State Street Room 326
Salt Lake City,UT 84111
SLCCouncil.com
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Dan Dugan,Chair
District 6
Darin Mano,Vice Chair
District 5
Victoria Petro-Eschler
District 1
Alejandro Puy
District 2
Chris Wharton
District 3
Ana Valdemoros
District 4
Amy Fowler
District 7
Generated:14:47:00
The Council has returned to a hybrid meeting approach.Hybrid Council meetings
allow people to join online through Webex or in person at the City &County
Building.
Public Comments:The public can give comments to the Council during their 7
p.m.formal meetings online through Webex and in-person in Room 326 of the
City and County Building.For more information,including Webex connection
information,please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings.(A phone line will
also be available for people whose only option is to call in.)
What to Expect:The hybrid format allows in-person participation and remains
mindful of existing COVID-19 protocols and gathering limits.A maximum of 24
people,including Council members and City staff,will be permitted in a meeting
room.If the capacity has been reached in the primary meeting room,overflow
space will be provided.Social distancing will be maintained.
Per an executive order signed by Mayor Mendenhall,face coverings are required
for vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals inside Salt Lake City facilities.
Please note:Dates not identified in the FYI -Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet
determined.
WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES
A.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.Council Member Dan Dugan will conduct the formal meeting.
2.Pledge of Allegiance.
3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules.
4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of January 18,2022 as
well as the formal meeting minutes of February 15,2022.
5.The Mayor will present recommendations to the Council regarding proposed
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)funding,Emergency Shelter Grant
(ESG)funding,Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME)funding,and
Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)funding.
B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1.Resolution:Art Barn Public Benefits Analysis
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that
would authorize the waiver of lease fees for the use of the Art Barn by the Salt Lake
City Arts Council Foundation.The Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation &Arts
Council Division is requesting to continue utilizing 54 Finch Lane,or the “Art
Barn”as the administrative headquarters,housing 6.5 Arts Council FTEs and
multiple seasonal and part-time employees,as well as to provide a home for the
Finch Lane Art Gallery and its numerous exhibitions.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 1,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 22,2022
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
2.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an
ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the
employment staffing document,for Fiscal Year 2021-22.Budget amendments
happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets,
including proposed project additions and modifications.The proposed
amendment includes funding for new Arts Council employees,adding a second
sergeant to the Special Victims Unit,and additional Emergency Rental Assistance
Program funding from the Federal Government,among other items.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022;Tuesday,February 8,2022;and Tuesday,
February 15,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 and Tuesday
March 1,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
3.Postponed –One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block
Grant &Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2022-23
Due to public information not being available,this item is rescheduled
to March 22,2022 at 7 p.m.
The Council will accept public comment and consider a resolution adopting the
Mayor’s funding recommendations and an appropriations resolution that would
adopt the One-Year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2022-23.The plan
includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)funding,HOME
Investment Partnership Program funding,Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)
funding,Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)funding.The
resolution would approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake
City and the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,March 8,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 15,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 22,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
1.Ordinance:Rezone and Master Plan Amendment for the Former Fire
Station No.3 Property
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning
map pertaining to properties located at 1085 East Simpson Avenue,1095 East
Simpson Avenue,1097 East Simpson Avenue,and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive to
rezone those properties from PL (Public Lands)District to CSHBD1 (Sugar House
Business District),and would amend the Sugar House Community Plan Future
Land Use Map.The purpose for the proposal is to consolidate the subject
properties with the property to the east for future development.Both properties
are owned by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City.There is no
development proposal associated with this request.Consideration may be given to
rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.
Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-01007 and PLNPCM2021-00914
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
2.Ordinance:Rezone at 1193 West California Avenue
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of
property located at approximately 1193 West California Avenue from R-1/7,000
(Single Family Residential District)to R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential
District).If approved,the property owner intends to subdivide the property,
remove the existing home and construct two new homes,potentially with attached
ADUs.The owner anticipates retaining ownership of both
properties.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning
district with similar characteristics.Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-00709
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
3.Ordinance:Rezone at 2060 North 2200 West
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning
map pertaining to one parcel of property located at 2060 North 2200 West Street
to rezone the property from AG-2 (Agricultural District)to M-1 (Light
Manufacturing District).The amendment is to implement the master plan zoning
and to accommodate future commercial land uses.No specific site development
proposal has been submitted at this time.Consideration may be given to rezoning
the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.Petition
No.:PLNPCM2021-00575
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
D.COMMENTS:
1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
2.Comments to the City Council.(Comments are taken on any item not scheduled
for a public hearing,as well as on any other City business.Comments are limited
to two minutes.)
E.NEW BUSINESS:
NONE.
F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1.Ordinance:Assessment for the Central Business Improvement Area –
22 (CBIA-22)
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would confirm the equalized
assessment list and levying an assessment against certain properties in the Salt
Lake City,Utah Central Business Improvement Assessment Area No.DA-CBIA-22
(the Assessment Area),for the purpose of financing certain economic promotion
activities in the downtown area over the next three years,and related matters.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
G.CONSENT:
1.Ordinance:Special Event Permits of Less than 31 Days
The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 22,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Section 2.58.040
of the Salt Lake City Code,relating to the sale of significant parcels of real
property,and Section 2.90.070 of the Salt Lake City Code,relating to the removal
of lands from the open space lands inventory.Proposed changes to these two
ordinances would allow special events lasting less than 31 days to occur on City
property with the approval of the Mayor for a reason identified by the Mayor in
writing.Note that although these amendments would affect sections of Code titled
“Sale of Significant Parcels of Real Property”(Section 2.58.040),and “Removal of
Lands from the Open Space Lands Inventory”(Section 2.90.070),the proposed
amendments would make no changes to the processes of sale or removal of open
space lands.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 22,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD
Staff Recommendation -Set date.
2.Ordinance:Rezone at approximately 2333 West North Temple Street
The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 22,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map
pertaining to a parcel at approximately 2333 W North Temple Street to remove the
Airport Flight Path Protection (AFPP)Overlay District Influence Zone A.The
property is currently occupied by a commercial building,the Airport Inn,and
associated parking.This proposal would allow the Airport Inn to operate a new
model of extended-stay hotels as transitional housing to advance the City’s overall
goals related to homelessness.Consideration may be given to rezoning the
property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.Petition
No.:PLNPCM2021-00915
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 22,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 5,2022
Staff Recommendation -Set date.
3.Ordinance -Street Vacation at 601 South 900 East
The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 22,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would partially vacate the
public right of way on 600 South and on 900 East adjacent to the corner property
located at 601 South 900 East.This request would not impact the adjacent
sidewalk or streets.Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-00614
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 22,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 5,2022
Staff Recommendation -Set date.
4.Ordinance:Homeless Resource Center and Homeless Shelter Text
Amendments
The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 22,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake
City Zoning Code by removing Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters
as conditional uses from the land use tables for the CG General Commercial,D-2
Downtown Support,and D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential Zoning Districts,
modify 21A.33.010 to clarify when listed land uses are prohibited,modify the
applicability section of 21A.36.350 Qualifying Provisions for Homeless Resource
Centers and Homeless Shelters,and modify the definitions of homeless resource
centers and homeless shelters in 21A.62.Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-01033
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,March 8,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 22,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD
Staff Recommendation -Set date.
5.Board Appointment:Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board –Katie
Darter
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Katie Darter to the
Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board for a term ending December 29,2025.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
6.Board Appointment:Business Advisory Board –Kristina Olivas
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Kristina Olivas to the
Business Advisory Board for a term ending December 28,2026.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
7.Board Appointment:Airport Board –John Bradshaw
The Council will consider approving the appointment of John Bradshaw to the
Airport Board for a term ending June 30,2025.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
8.Board Appointment:Library Board –Sarah Reale
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Sarah Reale to the Library
Board for a term ending June 30,2025.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
9.Board Reappointment:Business Advisory Board –Darin Piccoli
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Darin Piccoli to the
Business Advisory Board for a term ending December 28,2026.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
H.ADJOURNMENT:
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 3:00 pm.on Monday,February 28,2022,the undersigned,duly appointed City
Recorder,does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1)posted on the Utah Public
Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701,and (2)a copy of the foregoing provided
to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any
others who have indicated interest.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda,including but
not limited to adoption,rejection,amendment,addition of conditions and variations
of options discussed.
The City &County Building is an accessible facility.People with disabilities may make requests for
reasonable accommodation,which may include alternate formats,interpreters,and other auxiliary
aids and services.Please make requests at least two business days in advance.To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com,801-535-7600,or relay
service 711.
PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED
The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Work Session on Tuesday,January 18,2022 in
an electronic meeting pursuant to the Chair’s determination.
The following Council Members were present:
Ana Valdemoros,Amy Fowler,Darin Mano,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Victoria Petro-
Eschler,Alejandro Puy
Present Legislative leadership:
Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua
Weaver,Associate Deputy Director
Present Administrative leadership:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer
Present City Staff:
Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,Andrew Johnston
–Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach,DeeDee Robinson –Minutes and Records
Clerk,Taylor Hill –City Council Staff,Kaletta Lynch –Chief Equity Officer,Roxana Orellana
–City Language Coordinator
Council Member Dugan presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 4:14 pm.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,January 18,2022
1
Work Session Items
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,January 18,2022
2
1.Informational:Updates from the Administration ~4:15 p.m.
30 min.
The Council will receive an update from the Administration on major items or projects,
including but not limited to:
•COVID-19,the March 2020 Earthquake,and the September 2020 Windstorm;
•Updates on relieving the condition of people experiencing homelessness;
•Police Department work,projects,and staffing,etc.;and
•Other projects or updates.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Recurring Briefing
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Minutes:
Mayor Mendenhall and Rachel Otto provided information regarding:
COVID-19 Updates
•Current status;cases surging/record case numbers daily,limited testing resources in
the State,current goal to reduce hospitalizations,vaccinations still available and
high-quality masks should be worn by all,additional information found at
thisisourshot.com
•Free at-home tests available (COVIDtests.gov)
•Data updates;syndromic surveillance and hospitalizations,hospitalizations in Salt
Lake County was doubling every 14 days (43.5 new cases everyday),etc.
•Citywide vaccination average at 67.28%
•Statewide metrics compared to Utah’s transmission index
•Current legislation;Senate Joint Resolution (SJR)2 (terminating JR public health
order issued by local health department),HB 182 (prohibiting City Mayor from
issuing any order related to public health/exempts State facilities from local health
order),SB 113 (Test to Stay authority by governor,Senate president,Speaker of the
House and the State Superintendent of the school and Local Education Agency)
Andrew Johnston provided information regarding:
Homelessness Update
•Current Homeless Resource Center (HRC)and Overflow occupancy;shelter
capacity/bed availability
•Resource fairs;next one held on January 21,2022 (likely in the Ballpark
neighborhood)
•Cleaning and abatement;minimal abatement occurring due to low staffing levels
•Annual Point in Time Count scheduled for January 27 through 29,4-6 am.each
morning,500 volunteers needed
•Overflow status:St.Vincent DePaul (open nightly),Weigand Center (open nightly),
High Needs Temporary Housing (referral only for elderly and medically vulnerable
beginning today),Redwood Overflow Beds (open nightly beginning at the end of
January 2022),access line for emergency shelter beds:801 990-9999
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,January 18,2022
3
2.Informational:Equity Update ~4:45 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will hold a discussion about various initiatives led by the City's Office of
Equity and Inclusion.These initiatives include,but are not limited to,improving racial
equity and justice in policing.Discussion may also include updates on the City's other
work to achieve equitable service delivery,decision-making,and community engagement
through the Citywide Equity Plan,increased ADA resources,language access,and other
topics addressed in the ongoing work of the Human Rights Commission and the Racial
Equity in Policing Commission.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Recurring Briefing
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Minutes:
Kaletta Lynch provided information regarding:
•Racial Equity in Policing (REP)Commission meeting remotely today at 5:30 pm,
accessible by:www.slc.gov/boards/,agenda included:public comment available,
Park Ranger Program update,goals/priorities for 2022,sub-committee chair
updates,etc.
•Vacancies on the REP Commission (three positions);applications reviewed in the
meeting tonight
•Vacancies for Human Rights Commission (two positions)
•February 1,2022;Accessibility and Disability proposal to be brought to the Council
Roxana Orellana,new to Mayor’s Communications Team,introduced herself to the
Council.
Council Member Valdemoros welcomed Ms.Orellana to the City,and offered support
from herself and possibly other Council Members with assisting/motivating the spanish
speaking public to engage more in local government.She expressed excitement to be able
to provide the community more opportunities to engage.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,January 18,2022
4
3.Informational:Economic Outlook Presentation ~5:05 p.m.
40 min.
The Council will receive a briefing from the Gardner Policy Institute about their Economic
Outlook presentation to gain insights on the future of Utah’s economy.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,January 18,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Minutes:
Phil Dean (Kem C.Gardner Policy Institute)provided information regarding:
Top Takeaways
•Taking care of your people (labor shortages)
•Being prepared for economic re-sorting (supply chains shifting,demographic
changes,etc.)
•Caring for those left behind
Major Economic Indicators (in summary)
•Utah leading the nation in population growth at 18.4%
•Pandemic reducing life expectancy (demographic impacts)
•Utah’s Gross domestic product (GDP)vs.United States GDP
•Pandemic response (“unprecedented”Federal fiscal support)
•Lower household debt payments (debt being paid off/savings were up)
•Job growth (employment change from 2000 to 2021)
•Strong broad-based jobs recovery in Utah
•Resignation and labor shortages (quit rates from September 2001 to September
2021)
•Supply and demand (wages being too low)
•Increasing wages (for ages 16-24)
•Accelerating inflation (producer price index vs.consumer price index)
•Supply chain disruptions (global supply chain pressure index from September 1997
to January 2021)
•Historic low mortgage interest rates (30 year fixed)
•Rent on new leases up 17.2%in Salt Lake City/Salt Lake County
Utah Economic Forecast
•Continued low unemployment at 2.1%
•Job growth at 2.7%
•Continued population growth at 1.8%
•Increase in home values an total wages
•Forecast risks pros and cons;lingering pandemic,overall inflation,quality of life,
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,January 18,2022
5
infrastructure investments,strong pandemic recovery,etc.
Council Member Valdemoros requested more information regarding groups that might be
impacted more than others (an overview of income levels –percentages of those effected)
for the City/County as a whole.Mr.Dean said he would provide online resources
(containing more detailed information)to Council Staff for distribution and added that
more information could possibly be sought from tax data at the City level or from the
County as a whole,and eventual Census data would be released.
4.Board Appointment:Community Development and Capital
Improvement Programs (CDCIP)Advisory Board –Richard
Nazzaro
~5:45 p.m.
5 min.
The Council will interview Richard Nazzaro prior to considering her appointment to the
CDCIP Advisory Board for a term ending June 2,2025.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,January 18,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 18,2022
Minutes:
Interview held.Council Member Dugan said Richard Nazzaro’s name was on the Consent
Agenda for formal consideration.
5.Board Appointment:Community Development and Capital
Improvement Programs (CDCIP)Advisory Board –Jenny Bonk ~5:50 p.m.
5 min.
The Council will interview Jenny Bonk prior to considering her appointment to the CDCIP
Advisory Board for a term ending June 2,2025.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,January 18,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 18,2022
Minutes:
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,January 18,2022
6
Interview held.Council Member Dugan said Jenny Bonk’s name was on the Consent
Agenda for formal consideration.
6.Board Appointment:Community Development and Capital
Improvement Programs (CDCIP)Advisory Board –Jacob Skog ~5:55 p.m.
5 min.
The Council will interview Jacob Skog prior to considering her appointment to the CDCIP
Advisory Board for a term ending June 2,2025.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,January 18,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 18,2022
Minutes:
Interview held.Council Member Dugan said Jacob Skog’s name was on the Consent
Agenda for formal consideration.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,January 18,2022
7
Standing Items
7.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair
Report of Chair and Vice Chair.
Minutes:
Council Member Dugan noted the redistricting application period ended January 26,
2022 and spoke on the grim statistics of COVID-19 in Utah (ICUs were full,fourth highest
for COVID-19 cases in the United States,etc.);suggested getting vaccinated and wearing
masks to protect first responders and essential workers.
8.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director
Report of the Executive Director,including a review of Council information items and
announcements.The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to
City Council business,including but not limited to scheduling items.
Minutes:
Item not held.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,January 18,2022
8
9.Tentative Closed Session
The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session.A closed meeting described
under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including,but not limited to:
a.discussion of the character,professional competence,or physical or mental health
of an individual;
b.strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;
c.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
d.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase,exchange,or lease of real property,
including any form of a water right or water shares,if public discussion of the
transaction would:
(i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration;or
(ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
e.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property,including any form of a water
right or water shares,if:
(i)public discussion of the transaction would:
(A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration;or
(B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
(ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be
offered for sale;and
(iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves
the sale;
f.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel,devices,or systems;and
g.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to
Utah Code §78B-1-137,and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements
of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.
Minutes:
Item not held.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,January 18,2022
9
Meeting adjourned at:5:51 pm.
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
City Council Chair
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been
discussed;please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code
§52-4-203(2)(b).
To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake
City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body
Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of
your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view
meeting materials.
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City
Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday,January 18,2022.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,January 18,2022
10
PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED
The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Formal Session on Tuesday,February 15,2022.
The following Council Members were present:
Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-
Eschler,Alejandro Puy
Present Legislative leadership:
Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua
Weaver,Associate Deputy Director
Present Administrative leadership:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer
Present City Staff:
Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,DeeDee Robinson
–Minutes and Records Clerk,Ben Luedtke –Senior Public Policy Analyst,Brian Fullmer
–Constituent Liaison,Policy Analyst,Thais Stewart –Deputy City Recorder,Isaac Canedo
–Council Staff,Taylor Hill –City Council Staff,Delaney Sillman –City Council Staff
Council Member Dugan presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 pm.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
1
A.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.Council Member Dan Dugan will conduct the formal meeting.
Minutes:
Council Member Dugan welcomed attendees and detailed the hybrid meeting
format.
2.Pledge of Allegiance.
Minutes:
A moment of silence was held while the American Flag and Pledge were displayed.
3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules.
Minutes:
Council Member Dugan presented the rules of decorum.
4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of March 23,2021;
April 6,2021;January 4,2022;January 11,2022;and February 1,2022 as well as
the formal meeting minutes of April 20,2021;June 8,2021;August 17,2021;and
January 18,2022 as well as the minutes for the January 3,2022 Oath of Office
Ceremony and the January 25,2022 Council retreat.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember
Fowler to approve the work session meeting minutes of March 23,
2021;April 6,2021;January 4,2022;January 11,2022;February 1,
2022 as well as the formal meeting minutes of April 20,2021;June 8,
2021;August 17,2021;January 18,2022 as well as the minutes for the
January 3,2022 Oath of Office Ceremony and the January 25,2022
Council retreat.
AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-
Eschler,Alejandro Puy
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
2
5.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor
Mendenhall recognizing February as Black History Month in Salt Lake City.
Minutes:
Council Member Dugan read the resolution.
Pastor France Davis expressed gratitude to the Council for the resolution and
recognition of Black History Month.
Jeanetta Williams (NAACP President –Salt Lake Branch)expressed gratitude
to the Council for the joint resolution on behalf of the NAAP Executive Committee.
Council Member Puy spoke on immigrants and refugees throughout the City’s
westside (and throughout the City),and said this was also a celebration of their
history.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember
Wharton to adopt Resolution 4 of 2022,Joint Ceremonial Resolution
Recognizing February as Black History Month in Salt Lake City.
AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-
Eschler,Alejandro Puy
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
3
1.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing
document,for Fiscal Year 2021-22.Budget amendments happen several times
each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets,including proposed project
additions and modifications.The proposed amendment includes funding for new
Arts Council employees,adding a second sergeant to the Special Victims Unit,and
additional Emergency Rental Assistance Program funding from the Federal
Government,among other items.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022;Tuesday,February 8,2022;and Tuesday,
February 15,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Benjamin Luedtke provided a brief introduction to Budget Amendment No.6 for FY
2021-22.
There were no public comments.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Mano,seconded by Councilmember Fowler to
continue public hearing
AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Victoria
Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
4
2.Ordinance:Rezone and Master Plan Amendment for the Former Fire
Station No.3 Property
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would amend the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 1085 East
Simpson Avenue,1095 East Simpson Avenue,1097 East Simpson Avenue,and
1104 East Sugarmont Drive to rezone those properties from PL (Public Lands)
District to CSHBD1 (Sugar House Business District)and would amend the Sugar
House Community Plan Future Land Use Map.The purpose for the proposal is to
consolidate the subject properties with the property to the east for future
development.Both properties are owned by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt
Lake City.There is no development proposal associated with this
request.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning
district with similar characteristics.Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-01007
and PLNPCM2021-00914
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the proposed ordinance.
There were no public comments.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Valdemoros
to Close the public hearing and defer action
AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Victoria
Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
5
3.Ordinance:Rezone at 1193 West California Avenue
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would amend the zoning of property located at approximately 1193 West California
Avenue from R-1/7,000 (Single Family Residential District)to R-1/5,000 (Single
Family Residential District).If approved,the property owner intends to subdivide
the property,remove the existing home and construct two new homes,potentially
with attached ADUs.The owner anticipates retaining ownership of both
properties.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning
district with similar characteristics.Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-00709
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the proposed ordinance.
There were no public comments.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Puy to
Close the public hearing and defer action
AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Victoria
Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
6
4.Ordinance:Rezone at 2060 North 2200 West
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would amend the zoning map pertaining to one parcel of property located at 2060
North 2200 West Street to rezone the property from AG-2 (Agricultural District)
to M-1 (Light Manufacturing District).The amendment is to implement the master
plan zoning and to accommodate future commercial land uses.No specific site
development proposal has been submitted at this time.Consideration may be
given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar
characteristics.Petition No.:PLNPCM2021-00575
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the proposed ordinance.
There were no public comments.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Petro-Eschler,seconded by Councilmember
Wharton to Close the public hearing and defer action
AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Victoria
Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
7
C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
1.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.4 for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final
budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document,for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect
adjustments to the City’s budgets,including proposed project additions and
modifications.This amendment includes potential funding related to the
emergency winter overflow shelter,among other items.The Council adopted most
items in this amendment at previous public meetings.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,November 9,2021;Tuesday,November 16,2021;Tuesday,
December 7,2021;Tuesday,December 14,2021;and Tuesday,February 15,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,November 9,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,November 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,December 14,2021 and Tuesday,February
15,2022
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Wharton to
adopt Ordinance 4 of 2022:Budget Amendment No.4 for Fiscal Year 2021-22,
only for item E-2:Emergency Winter Overflow Shelter Lease Payment
Support.
AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Chris Wharton,Alejandro Puy
NAY:Ana Valdemoros,Victoria Petro-Eschler
Final Result:5 –2 Pass
D.COMMENTS:
1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
Minutes:
There were no questions.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
8
2.Comments to the City Council.(Comments are taken on any item not scheduled
for a public hearing,as well as on any other City business.Comments are limited
to two minutes.)
Minutes:
Keiko Jones spoke regarding rezoning;in general was opposed to rezoning one
property at time (to accomodate higher density),suggested creating environments
that were supportive of families and a moratorium (or slow down)on development
of all new multi-level apartments (and find better solutions).
Debbie Mayo expressed gratitude to the Council for their decision during the
Work Session to refer the rezoning of 1583 East Stratford Avenue back to the
Planning Commission.
Wendy Garvin,Denise Weaver,Kelly Lake and Loni Newby spoke
regarding and shared a story about funding the Ramada Inn High Needs Shelter,
current shelter options not being adequate,the vulnerable community needing
this important shelter,multiple new shelters were needed,needs for non-
congregate style housing,etc.
Cindy Cromer spoke regarding the previous Work Session discussion of Pioneer
Park and the need for retaining the City’s parks,past efforts for green space in the
City,and open space preservation in the City was of high importance.
E.NEW BUSINESS:
NONE.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
9
F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1.Ordinance:Accessibility and Disability Commission
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Section
2.07.020,Section 10.02.040,Section 10.02.110 and enact chapter 10.07 of the Salt
Lake City Code pertaining to the Accessibility and Disability Commission.The
proposed changes would formalize the Commission,recognizing its important
advisory role in improving and enhancing accessibility for community members
experiencing a disability through a practice,systematic,and solution-based
approach.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 15,2022
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Mano to
adopt Ordinance 5 of 2022:Accessibility and Disability Commission.
AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Victoria
Petro-Eschler,Alejandro Puy
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
10
G.CONSENT:
1.One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant &
Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2022-23
The Council will set the date of March 1,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public comment
and consider a resolution adopting the Mayor’s funding recommendations and an
appropriations resolution that would adopt the One-Year Annual Action Plan for
Fiscal Year 2022-23.The plan includes Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG)funding,HOME Investment Partnership Program funding,Emergency
Solutions Grant (ESG)funding,Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS
(HOPWA)funding.The resolution would approve an Interlocal Cooperation
Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD).
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,March 8,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 15,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 1,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD
Staff Recommendation -Set date.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
11
2.Ordinance:Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 1583 East
Stratford Avenue
The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 1,2022 at 7 p.m.to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of
property located at approximately 1583 East Stratford Avenue from RMF-35
(Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District)to CN (Neighborhood
Commercial District)and would amend the Sugar House Master Plan Future Land
Use Map.No specific site development proposal has been submitted at this time.
Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district
with similar characteristics.Petition No.:PLNPCM2020-00393 and 00394
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 15,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 15,2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 1,2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 22,2022
Staff Recommendation -Set date.
3.Board Appointment:Public Utilities Advisory Committee (PUAC):
Alexander Lovell
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Alexander Lovell to the
PUAC for a term ending January 19,2026.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 15,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 15,2022
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
12
4.Board Appointment:Public Utilities Advisory Committee (PUAC):
Kathryn Floor
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Kathryn Floor to the
PUAC for a term ending January 19,2026.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 15,2022
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 15,2022
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
5.Board Reappointment:Parks,Natural Lands,Trails,and Urban
Forestry (PNUT)Board –Jenny Hewson
The Council will consider the reappointment of Jenny Hewson to the Parks,
Natural Lands,Trails,and Urban Forestry Advisory (PNUT)Board for a term
extending through February 15,2025.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 15,2022
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
13
6.Board Reappointment:Parks,Natural Lands,Trails,and Urban
Forestry (PNUT)Board –Samantha Finch
The Council will consider the reappointment of Samantha Finch to the Parks,
Natural Lands,Trails,and Urban Forestry Advisory (PNUT)Board for a term
extending through February 15,2025.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 15,2022
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
Minutes:
Council Member Mano asked if he needed to clarify his recusal on Item No.2 (rezone at
1583 Stratford)on the Consent Agenda and was assured it was unnecessary to recuse as
that item had been removed in the motion.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Fowler,seconded by Councilmember Wharton to
approve the Consent Agenda with the exclusion of Item No.2.
AYE:Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Victoria Petro-Eschler,
Alejandro Puy
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
14
H.ADJOURNMENT:
Meeting adjourned at:8:17 pm.
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
City Council Chair
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been
discussed;please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code
§52-4-203(2)(b).
To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake
City Public Body Minutes library,available at www.data.slc.gov,selecting the Public Body
Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of
your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’information to listen to the audio or view
meeting materials.
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City
Council Formal meeting held Tuesday,February 15,2022.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 15,2022
15
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Office Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 23,2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community and Neighborhoods (CAN)
__________________________
SUBJECT: Appropriation Resolution adopting the One-Year Action Plan for Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding, Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funding, HOME
Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funding, and Housing Opportunities for Person With
AIDS (HOPWA) funding for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and approval of the signing of an Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD).
STAFF CONTACT: Tony Milner, Director, Housing Stability Division
801-535-6168, tony.milner@slcgov.com
Dillon Hase, Community Development Grant Supervisor,
Housing Stability Division
801-535-6402, dillon.hase@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the included resolution and set the following schedule for
work sessions and required public hearing. This will help the Administration ensure compliance
with HUD regulations requiring submission of the 2022-2023 One-Year Action Plan (also
referred to as the Annual Action Plan) by May 15, 2022.
We also request the City Council:
1.Schedule the following required public hearings:
a.March 1, 2022, Council Public Hearing to accept the Mayor’s grant
recommendations and to hear comments from the public on the One-Year Action
Plan.
Lisa Shaffer (Feb 24, 2022 07:09 MST)02/24/2022
02/24/2022
b. March 22, 2022, HUD-Required Public Hearing to meet public comment
requirements.
2. Schedule the following work sessions:
a. March 8, 2022, first full briefing/funding discussion.
b. March 22, 2022, follow-up briefing/funding discussion.
c. April 5, 2022, if needed, follow-up briefing/funding discussion.
3. Schedule the formal adoption of the One-Year Action Plan:
a. April 19, 2022, formal meeting: to potentially adopt the One-Year Action Plan as
outlined in the attached resolution for CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funds
as provided through HUD.
BUDGET IMPACT: No impact to City General Fund. Grant funds will be received from HUD
for 2022-2023.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City is an entitlement entity and eligible under Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 24, Part 91, et. al., to receive estimated 2022-2023 CDBG funds
in the amount of $3,570,517, ESG funds in the amount of $299,267, HOME funds in the amount
of $974,863, and HOPWA funds in the amount of $840,196 from HUD for the 2022-2023
program year.
The City’s process for allocating these funds includes a competitive application process followed
by a thorough review of applications by certain resident advisory boards. The resident advisory
boards provide funding recommendations that are forwarded to the Mayor for consideration. The
Mayor then provides funding recommendations that are forwarded along with the resident
advisory board recommendations to the City Council. To receive and reallocate these funds to
specific subrecipients, the City Council is required to adopt the One-Year Action Plan allocating
HUD funds that principally benefit low- to-moderate income (LMI) residents. The One-Year
Action Plan must align with the Salt Lake City 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan (“Consolidated
Plan”) as adopted by the City Council and approved by HUD. The City Attorney’s Office
reviewed the included resolution (Exhibit A: Resolution 2022-2023 Federal Grant Award and
One-Year Action Plan) and approves it as to form.
Please be aware that the entitlement award amounts contained herein are estimates based on the
previous year’s allocations and most recent information from HUD. As of the date of this
transmittal, the City has not received notification by HUD of the final award amounts.
Due to the Federal Government operating under a Continuing Resolution (CR), and the timing of
receiving the City’s awards notifications from HUD, the City may not have final award amounts
prior to the Council’s formal meeting in April to adopt the One-Year Action Plan. In this case,
the Administration will look for direction from the Council, regarding adjustments to final award
amounts for any increases or decreases in HUD funding. The Housing Trust Fund Advisory
Board (HTFAB) and the Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs (CD-
CIP) Advisory Board have also provided recommendations for any increases or decreases in
HUD funding. Housing Stability staff can provide guidance to the Council in making such
determinations.
In addition to the annual entitlement award amounts, the City will also reallocate CDBG funds in
the amount of $1,100,000, ESG funds in the amount of $27,000, HOME funds in the amount of
$146,240, and HOPWA funds in the amount of $69,930.
The following table represents the estimated entitlement funding the City will receive for the
2022-2023 program year.
Entitlement Funding
Grant Amount
Community Development Block Grant $ 3,570,517
Emergency Solutions Grant $ 299,267
HOME Investment Partnerships Program $ 974,863
Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS $ 840,196
Note: This table represents estimated 2022-2023 entitlement funding awards based on the grant
award from the previous funding program year. 2022-2023 Entitlement Funding amounts will be
updated once HUD issues notification of final funding awards.
The following table represent the dollar amounts for funds that have been recaptured from
previous program years and are available for reallocation for the 2022-2023 program year. These
are funds that were positively identified as available for recapture, because of agreement
expiration or project completion, at the end of the most recently closed HUD program year. Any
recaptured funds retain the federal requirements, eligibility criteria and limitations of the original
federal funding source. Also of note, the 20% Administrative and Planning cap and the 15%
Public Services cap for CDBG are both hard tied to the HUD program year and do not carry
forward. Therefore, any recaptured CDBG funding may not be allocated to administration or
public services programs, rather they would only be available to use for the Housing and
Neighborhood Improvements category as defined within the Consolidated Plan.
Reallocated Funding
Grant Amount
Community Development Block Grant $ 1,100,000
Emergency Solutions Grant $ 27,000
HOME Investment Partnerships Program $ 146,240
Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS $ 69,930
The following table represent the estimated entitlement funding the City will receive for the
2022-2023 program year plus the funds that have been recaptured from previous program years
and are available for reallocation for the 2022-2023 program year. The funding
recommendations contained within Exhibit A are based on this amount of total funding
availability.
Total Funding
Grant Amount
Community Development Block Grant $ 4,670,517
Emergency Solutions Grant $ 326,267
HOME Investment Partnership Program $ 1,121,103
Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS $ 910,126
Note: 2022-2023 Entitlement Funding amounts will be updated once HUD issues notification of
final funding awards.
The Community Development and Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) Advisory Board and
the Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board (HTFAB) reviewed applications for CDBG and ESG,
and HOME and HOPWA respectively. After thorough review and scoring each board made
funding recommendations. The boards use an estimated amount of funding for each grant, based
upon the grant award from the prior federal program year. The boards also included
recommendations on projects that should receive increases or decreases of funding if the final
allocation amounts would be different than amounts estimated at the time of the board meetings.
The boards’ recommendations were forwarded to the Mayor for review and consideration. The
2022-2023 One-Year Action Plan Funding Recommendations Log (attached to Exhibit A) for all
grants will be attached to the resolution after the City Council has made final funding decisions.
PUBLIC PROCESS: From July 2021 to January 2022, Housing Stability staff conducted a
survey to engage members of the public and receive input on how federal funding could be
prioritized. In the past Housing Stability staff would have attended over a dozen in-person
community events. Due to COVID-19 precautions, Housing Stability staff worked with the
City’s Civic Engagement team and pivoted to an online community engagement survey, reaching
out electronically to Salt Lake City’s resident, Recognized Community Organizations, and over
100 non-profits and community partners. The survey was offered in English and Spanish.
Additionally, to hear from vulnerable populations without access to computers, paper versions of
the survey were safely collected at the Homeless Resources Centers, two adult Detox locations,
the Homeless Youth Resource Center, the Sorensen Community Center, and two local food
banks, as well as a few outdoor community events. A total of 501 responses were received.
The public was asked to give input on their top priorities of the goals identified in the
Consolidated Plan. Priority ranking for each goal of the Consolidated Plan were provided, as
follows:
• Housing – Build new affordable housing and homeownership for low-income
populations.
• Transportation – Provide transit passes to low-income populations.
• Build Community Resiliency – Early childhood education.
• Homeless Services – Homeless Resources Centers operations and emergency shelter.
• Behavioral Health – Treatment, counseling, and case management for behavioral health.
The CDCIP and HTFAB Boards considered these priorities and how they align with the goals of
the Consolidated Plan when identifying projects to be recommended for the 2022-2023 program
year.
A General Needs Hearing was held on November 10, 2021, as a required HUD forum to allow
the public an opportunity to voice general ideas or concerns regarding community needs. This
hearing is an opportunity for the CDCIP and HTFAB boards to consider the public’s ideas and
how these ideas align with the goals of the Consolidated Plan. The ideas presented during a
General Needs Hearing are typically discussed during subsequent board meetings to help identify
which funding requests would be recommended by the boards. At the General Needs Hearing
held on November 10, 2021, a total of seven (7) public comments were received with all of them
relating to the need for additional and more comprehensive homeless services.
The HOME and HOPWA applications were reviewed during a public meeting by the HTFAB on
November 18, 2021, December 1, 2021, and February 2, 2022. The CDBG and ESG applications
were reviewed during eight (8) public meetings by the CDCIP board between November 15,
2021, and January 24, 2022.
On February 9, 2022, CAN and Housing Stability leadership met with Mayor Mendenhall to
review the CDCIP and HTFAB recommendations. The Mayor accepted the recommendations
from the CDCIP and HTFAB boards.
Council is scheduled to hold a Public Hearing on March 1, 2022, to hear the Mayor’s funding
recommendations and begin their funding allocation process. It is proposed that the Council hold
a HUD required Public Hearing on March 22, 2022, to receive feedback from the general public,
including applicants, regarding HUD funding for the 2022-2023 program year.
EXHIBIT:
A. Resolution 2022-2023 Federal Grant Award and One-Year Action Plan, attached with
2022-2023 One-Year Action Plan Funding Recommendation Log
EXHIBIT A:
Resolution 2022-2023 Federal Grant Award and One-Year Action Plan, and 2022-2023
One-Year Action Plan Funding Recommendation Log
1
RESOLUTION NO.________ OF 2022
An appropriations resolution adopting the One-Year Annual Action Plan for 2022-2023 that
includes Community Development Block Grant funding, Emergency Solutions Grant funding,
HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding, Housing Opportunities for Persons With
AIDS funding, and approving the signing of an Interlocal Cooperation agreement between Salt
Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City (City) is eligible under Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Title 24, Part 91, et. al., to receive 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funds in the amount of $3,518,665, Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds in the amount of
$299,267, HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funds in the amount of $974,863,
and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funds in the amount of $840,196
from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the program year;
WHEREAS, the City will also reallocate CDBG funds in the amount of $1,100,000, ESG
funds in the amount of $27,000, HOME funds in the amount of $146,240, and HOPWA funds in
the amount of $69,930;
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the people of Salt Lake City that the City file an
application with HUD for said funds in accordance with 24 CFR Part 91;
WHEREAS, in order to receive said funds, the City is required to adopt a One-Year
Annual Action Plan;
WHEREAS, the public notices, hearings, and other pre-submission requirements as set
forth in 24 CFR Part 91 have been accomplished by the City, including but not limited to the
following: A City Council public hearing was held March 22, 2022 to consider the projects
funded through the 2022-2023 One-Year Annual Action Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does now meet on this day of , 2022 to adopt
the City s 2022-2023 One-Year Action Plan for CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as
follows:
1. That the City hereby adopts the 2022-2023 One-Year Annual Action Plan for
CDBG, ESG, HOME and HOPWA funds as set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto and made a part hereof by this reference.
2. That the Mayor, as the official representative of Salt Lake City, or her designee,
is hereby authorized to submit the 2022-2023 One-Year Annual Action Plan for
CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funds together with such additional
information and certifications as may be required under 24 CFR Part 91 to the
U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development.
2
3. That the Mayor, as the official representative of Salt Lake City, or her designee,
is hereby authorized to sign and execute a grant agreement with HUD (the
HUD Grant Agreement ) regarding the aforementioned federal grant funds,
and any and all subsequent agreements between the City and other public
entities resulting from and consistent with the HUD Grant Agreement, subject
to final approval as to form by the City Attorney.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2022.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By _____________________________
CHAIR
Approved as to form: __________________________
Kimberly Chytraus
Date: ___________________________
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY RECORDER
3
EXHIBIT A
Funding Recommendations for 2022-2023. Exhibit A attached hereto, shall include Funding
Recommendations for the CDBG Program, Funding Recommendations for the ESG Program,
Funding Recommendations for the HOME Program, and Funding Recommendations for the
HOPWA Program (the Funding Recommendations are collectively referred to as the One-Year
Annual Action Plan ).
Estimated 2022-2023 Funding Available: 4,670,517$
Category Maximum Allocated Balance
2022-2023 Admin (20%):714,103$ -$ 714,103$
2022-2023 Public Services (15%):535,577$ -$ 535,577$
2022-2023 Housing & Neighborhood Improvements:2,876,438$ -$ 3,420,837$
1 Attorney's Office FY21-22 29,827$ REQUEST:28,564$
FY20-21 29,869$ CDCIP:28,564$
FY19-20 24,427$ MAYOR:28,564$
FY18-19 25,090$ COUNCIL:
FY17-18 24,369$
5 YR TOTAL 133,582$
2 Finance Department FY21-22 60,989$ REQUEST:64,270$
FY20-21 61,035$ CDCIP:64,270$
FY19-20 54,565$ MAYOR:64,270$
FY18-19 56,047$ COUNCIL:
FY17-18 56,047$
5 YR TOTAL 288,683$
3 FY21-22 611,016$ REQUEST:621,269$
FY20-21 610,929$ CDCIP:621,269$
FY19-20 607,799$ MAYOR:621,269$
FY18-19 624,299$ COUNCIL:
FY17-18 566,616$
5 YR TOTAL 3,020,659$
REQUEST:714,103$
CDCIP:714,103$
MAYOR:714,103$
COUNCIL:-$
1 ASSIST, Inc. FY21-22 700,000$ REQUEST:700,000$
FY20-21 391,373$ CDCIP:700,000$
FY19-20 391,000$ MAYOR:700,000$
FY18-19 320,000$ COUNCIL:Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 330,000$
5 YR TOTAL 2,132,373$
2 First Step House New REQUEST:322,000$
Recovery Residence Rehabilitation CDCIP:322,000$
MAYOR:322,000$
COUNCIL:Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
0.0%
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED
2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
% OF GRANT AWARD
Funding for salaries and operational expenses of Housing Stability to
administer and monitor the federal grants and to conduct the community
processes.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Supporting salaries, operational, and rehabilitation activities including
plumbing, heating & electrical, radon testing/mitigation, roof repair,
accessibility ramps, and accessibility design projects, etc.
102.17
Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging
housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and
diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
Funds for critical rehabilitation at 4 recovery residences (transitional housing)
for sober living.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114 99.17
Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging
housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and
diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2022/2023
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
% OF GRANT AWARD
HOUSING
FUNDING CAPS AS REQUIRED BY FEDERAL REGULATION
Emergency Home Repair & Accessibility and
Community Design
CITY ADMINISTRATION
Partial funding for staff salary to provide contract administration for federal
grants.
Partial funding for staff salary to provide financial administration and
accounting services for federal grants.
Housing Stability Division
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME
Note: 20% is the maximum amount allowed. Will auto adjust to 20% when SLC receives HUD award
CITY ADMINISTRATION TOTAL
20.0%
20.0%
20.0%
CDBG Page 1
3 New REQUEST:474,976$
CDCIP:300,000$
MAYOR:300,000$
COUNCIL:Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
4 FY21-22 600,000$ REQUEST:600,000$
FY20-21 485,600$ CDCIP:500,000$
FY19-20 439,873$ MAYOR:500,000$
FY18-19 577,542$ COUNCIL:Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 565,000$
5 YR TOTAL 2,668,015$
5 Salt Lake City - Housing Stability Division FY21-22 60,000$ REQUEST:30,000$
FY20-21 60,000$ CDCIP:30,000$
Salt Lake City Small Repair Program FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 60,000$
5 YR TOTAL 180,000$
6 Neighborworks of Salt Lake New REQUEST:200,000$
CDCIP:196,837$
Home Rehabilitation & Improvement MAYOR:196,837$
COUNCIL:Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
REQUEST:2,326,976$
CDCIP:2,048,837$
MAYOR:2,048,837$
COUNCIL:-$
1 New REQUEST:550,000$
CDCIP:550,000$
MAYOR:550,000$
COUNCIL:Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
2 FY21-22 322,000$ REQUEST:750,000$
FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:172,000$
FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:172,000$
FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 -$
5 YR TOTAL 322,000$
3 Salt Lake City - Housing Stability Division FY21-22 502,000$ REQUEST:650,000$
FY20-21 425,883$ CDCIP:650,000$
FY19-20 319,642$ MAYOR:650,000$
FY18-19 425,000$ COUNCIL:
FY17-18 200,000$
5 YR TOTAL 1,872,525$
REQUEST:1,950,000$
CDCIP:1,372,000$
MAYOR:1,372,000$
COUNCIL:-$
86.50
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Transportation: Improve bus stop amenities as a way to encourage
the accessibility of public transit and enhance the experience of
public transit in target areas.
41.8%
29.4%
International Center for Appropriate and
Sustainable Technology (ICAST)
Rehabilitate Safe Haven supportive housing apartment complex, by replacing
gas heating with very high-efficiency heating and hot water systems.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Decarbonizing Supportive Housing
Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging
housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and
diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
Ballpark TRAX Accessible Pedestrian Crossing
Salt Lake City Housing Rehabilitation and
Homebuyer Program
Community Resiliency: Economic Development efforts via
supporting the improvement and visibility of small businesses
through façade improvement programs.
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
% OF GRANT AWARD
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114 90.17
Transportation: Expand and support the installation of bike racks,
stations, and amenities as a way to encourage use of alternative
modes of transportation.
Salt Lake City - Housing Stability Division Salaries and operational support for the Housing Rehab, Welcome Home SLC
Homebuyer, Handyman, and West Side Node Improvement projects.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114 89.83
Housing: Support programs that provide access to home ownership
via down payment assistance, and/or housing subsidy, and/or
financing.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
90.50
86.20
Housing: Expand housing support for aging resident that ensure
access to continued stable housing.
Home Rehabilitation & Improvement (NHRI) will provide grants and loans to
low-to-moderate income Salt Lake City homeowners to fund necessary
repairs and improvements to their home. Grants will be issued up to $10,000
and loans up to $25,000.
Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging
housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and
diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
HOUSING TOTAL
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS
Salt Lake City - Transportation Division
Salt Lake City - Transportation Division
Target Area Bus Stop Improvements
Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
49.8%
43.9%
43.9%
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS: TRANSPORTATION & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFASTRUCTURE
Construction of 2 ADA-compliant crosswalks on 1300 South, in either
direction, to the Ballpark TRAX transit stop.
93.67
Construction of multiple ADA-compliant bus stops and/or transit-critical
crosswalks in the Consolidated Plan target areas, to include bus shelters,
benches, trash cans, and bike racks as appropriate.
0.00%
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114 97.67Neighborhood Business Improvement
Program (NBIP)
Provide grant money to businesses for facade improvements, focusing on
small businesses and target areas.
29.4%
0.0%
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS: TRANSPORTATION & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFASTRUCTURE TOTAL
Targeting qualifying seniors and persons with disabilities to provide small
dollar value services for home improvement and service or repair.
CDBG Page 2
1 FY21-22 60,250$ REQUEST:85,000$
FY20-21 64,809$ CDCIP:55,000$
FY19-20 68,884$ MAYOR:55,000$
FY18-19 55,000$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 30,000$
5 YR TOTAL 278,943$
2 Catholic Community Services of Utah New REQUEST:50,000$
CDCIP:35,000$
MAYOR:35,000$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
3 Community Development Corporation FY21-22 74,800$ REQUEST:$47,766
Housing Counseling FY20-21 68,100$ CDCIP:-$
FY19-20 67,447$ MAYOR:-$
FY18-19 70,500$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 70,000$
5 YR TOTAL 350,847$
4 English Skills Learning Center FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:38,500$
FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY19-20 30,000$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY18-19 30,000$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 -$
5 YR TOTAL 60,000$
5 First Step House FY21-22 41,700$ REQUEST:45,000$
FY20-21 47,000$ CDCIP:30,299$
FY19-20 30,000$ MAYOR:30,299$
FY18-19 COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18
5 YR TOTAL 118,700$
6 First Step House FY21-22 48,000$ REQUEST:58,115$
FY20-21 50,000$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY19-20 38,806$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY18-19 30,000$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 36,833$
5 YR TOTAL 203,639$
7 International Rescue Committee FY21-22 54,400$ REQUEST:63,407$
FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:40,000$
FY19-20 44,629$ MAYOR:40,000$
FY18-19 COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18
5 YR TOTAL 99,029$
8 Neighborhood House Association FY21-22 38,449$ REQUEST:52,009$
FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:40,000$
FY19-20 36,867$ MAYOR:40,000$
FY18-19 33,858$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 30,000$
5 YR TOTAL 139,174$
9 Odyssey House New REQUEST:60,000
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
Provide case management services to individuals experiencing homelessness
at the Weigand Homeless Resource Center.
Peer Support Services
86.67
67.83
Digital Skills & Education Access to Build
Resiliency Refugees and New Americans
Funds will facilitate Digital Inclusion staff to support refugee and other new
Americans access/learn digital technology skills, critical to improving their
economic and housing stability.
Employment Preparation and Placement
(EPP) Program
Salaries and administrative costs for Peer Support Services (PSS) Program
which provides peer-based supportive services, delivered by certified Peer
Support Specialists.
Community Resiliency: Expand access to early childhood education
to set the stage for academic achievement, social development,
and change the cycle of poverty.
Neighborhood House Early Education
Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational training
programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114 88.00
Assistance for families with childcare as they search for and maintain
employment. Funds will support early education teacher salaries and benefits.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
97.33
Housing: Support programs that provide access to home ownership
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Provisional Supportive Employment
Program
98.33
100.67
Provide employment opportunities to homeless individuals or formerly
homeless.
Procurement of three vehicles for staff to assist clients with the following
appointments: Odyssey House primarily provides transportation for medical,
legal, DCFS appointments, school, grocery shopping, recreational therapy, etc.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational training
programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations.
93.83
Case Manager-Weigand Homeless
Resource Center
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED
% OF GRANT AWARD
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
PUBLIC SERVICES
Homeless Services: Expand case management support as a way to
connect those experiencing homelessness with
permanent housing and supportive services
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Advantage Services, Inc Formerly Valley
Services
Residential Treatment Transportation
Provide housing counseling classes and help connect individuals and families
with public resources and information on fair housing, fair lending and
accessibility rights.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Bring free and accessible content-based English language instruction to adult
immigrants and refugees living at or below the poverty line.
Provide supportive employment services to high-risk, high-need individuals in
our community caught in the cycles of relapse, mental illness, incarceration,
homelessness, and unemployment.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
94.50
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Empowering Parents with English, Digital,
Financial, and Family Literacy
79.33
Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options, counseling support,
and case management for those experiencing behavioral health
crisis.
Community Resiliency: Promote digital inclusion through access to
digital communication technologies and the internet.
Community Resiliency: Expand access to early childhood education
to set the stage for academic achievement, social development,
and change the cycle of poverty.
Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options, counseling support,
and case management for those experiencing behavioral health
crisis.
CDBG Page 3
10 Odyssey House
Transitional Living Program
New REQUEST:84,000
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$
11 New REQUEST:100,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
12 Salt Lake City Bicycle Collective New REQUEST:100,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
13 Salt Lake City Division of Transportation FY21-22 34,700$ REQUEST:45,000$
FY20-21 45,000$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY18-19 45,000$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 30,000$
5 YR TOTAL 154,700$
14 Salt Lake Donated Dental Services FY21-22 44,400$ REQUEST:50,000$
FY20-21 44,000$ CDCIP:42,500$
FY19-20 48,510$ MAYOR:42,500$
FY18-19 30,000$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 30,000$
5 YR TOTAL 196,910$
15 Shelter The Homeless Committee Inc FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:136,130$
FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:57,778$
FY19-20 MAYOR:57,778$
FY18-19 COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18
5 YR TOTAL -$
16 South Valley Sanctuary FY21-22 100,000$ REQUEST:100,000$
FY20-21 30,000$ CDCIP:50,000$
FY19-20 -MAYOR:50,000$
FY18-19 -COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 -
5 YR TOTAL 130,000$
17 The Children's Center New REQUEST:110,000$
Therapeutic Preschool Program CDCIP:55,000$
MAYOR:55,000$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
18 The Inn Between FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:96,600$
End of Life Care and Medical Respite FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:-$
FY19-20 45,599$ MAYOR:-$
FY18-19 45,543$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 33,125$
5 YR TOTAL 124,267$
Homelessness Prevention & Employment
Assistance Program
Provide free bicycle transportation to low-income communities, offer
technical training to become a skilled bicycle mechanic, and creates a safe
space for marginalized and underrepresented people to comfortably work on
their own bicycles.
Community Resiliency: Expand access to early childhood education
to set the stage for academic achievement, social development,
and change the cycle of poverty.
Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless services including
Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow
operations.
84.00
53.33
97.17
104.17
97.50
85.67Domestic Violence Case Manager and
Housing Assistance
Bikes for Goodwill
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Transitional Living Program
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Low Income Transit Passes
Transportation: Support access to transportation prioritizing very
low-income and vulnerable populations.
Greater Equatoria Region Association
(GERA)
Salaries, supplies, and lab fees for Community Dental Project, to support
homeless and low-income individuals with dental services.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114Community Dental Project
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Assist refugee and immigrant clients with the following services: negotiating
with a landlord, supporting opportunities for housing, providing emergency
rent assistance, and utilities support.
80.83
Provide affordable transportation to individuals experiencing homelessness in
Salt Lake City. The program partners with local social service providers to
provide transit passes to their clients at no cost to overcome transportation
barriers.
Homeless Services: Expand support for medical and dental care
options for those experiencing homelessness.
Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless services including
Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow
operations.
Homeless Services: Expand case management support as a way to
connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing
and supportive services.
This program provides treatment for preschool-aged children, who have been
the victims of assault or trauma, and who are struggling to succeed in
childcare or preschool. Follow up with intensive group therapy to gain
resilience and learn essential skills.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Pay for partial meal costs of the two Salt Lake City Homeless Resource
Centers. Costs will cover lunch and dinner costs for meal prep and delivery.
Domestic Violence Case Manager salary, benefits, mileage and client rental
assistance.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114Homeless Resource Centers Meals
87.83
Provides homeless individuals who need hospice or other end of life care and
temporary medical respite housing for homeless individuals experiencing a
medical crisis.
Transportation: Support access to transportation prioritizing very
low-income and vulnerable populations.
Staff increase for Odyssey House’s Transitional Living program which provides
affordable, temporary housing for low to moderate-income families who
recently graduated from Odyssey House or other treatment programs.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
81.67
Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options, counseling support,
and case management for those experiencing behavioral health
crisis.
Community Resiliency: Provide support for programs that reduce
food insecurity for vulnerable population.
CDBG Page 4
19 The Road Home FY21-22 72,000$ REQUEST:80,000$
FY20-21 CDCIP:-$
FY19-20 MAYOR:-$
FY18-19 COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18
5 YR TOTAL 72,000$
20 The Road Home New REQUEST:45,950$
CDCIP:40,000$
MAYOR:40,000$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
21 The Road Home New REQUEST:222,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
22 The Road Home FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:70,000$
FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:-$
FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:-$
FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 -$
5 YR TOTAL -$
23 Utah AIDS Foundation New REQUEST:45,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
24 Wasatch Community Gardens New REQUEST:58,520$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
25 YWCA Utah FY21-22 33,900$ REQUEST:172,161$
FY20-21 58,285$ CDCIP:-$
FY19-20 58,285$ MAYOR:-$
FY18-19 51,260$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY17-18 34,971$
5 YR TOTAL 236,701$
REQUEST:2,015,158$
CDCIP:535,577$
MAYOR:535,577$
COUNCIL:-$
Provides farm-based employment, work readiness training, job placement
assistance, and mentoring for women facing and/or experiencing
homelessness. Request for One-time expenses related to farm move including
partial soil removal and disposal, Geotextile layer, Importing clean soil, and
palletizing and moving supplies.Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational training
programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations.
Magnolia Apartments
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114Women in Jeopardy Program
Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless services including
Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow
operations.
94.00
84.33
89.33
Housing Staffing
95.17
64.83
83.67
Housing: Provide housing and essential supportive services to
persons with HIV/AIDS
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114St. Vincent de Paul Overflow
Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless services including
Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow
operations.
Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless services including
Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow
operations.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Homeless Services: Expand case management support as a way to
connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing
and supportive services.
The housing navigation staff work at four of the resource centers and
coordinate with other service providers to serve households referred into the
program.
Gail Miller Resource Center
15.0%
15.0%
56.4%
Note: 15% is the maximum amount allowed per HUD regulations PUBLIC SERVICES TOTAL
Onsite case managers provide supportive services to individuals to help them
maintain their housing and avoid exiting to homelessness.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Respond to a persistent need among clients living with HIV and AIDS for
increased access to behavioral health counseling that specifically targets the
needs of their population.Hous
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114Green Team Program
Clinical Mental Health
The winter shelter provides overflow services during the coldest months of
the year to individuals who are unlikely to seek traditional shelter, due to
barriers.
The Gail Miller Resource Center provides emergency shelter to men and
women experiencing homelessness in Salt Lake County. Shelter is available
24/7, 365 days each year.
Homeless Services: Expand case management support as a way to
connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing
and supportive services.
YWCA’s secure, emergency shelter offers 36 onsite and 4 overflow units to
victims left homeless due to domestic violence. Provide salary and benefits
for essential shelter staffing infrastructure.
89.50
0.0%
CDBG Page 5
FUND REQUEST
Housing 2,326,976$
Neighborhood Improvements: Transp & ED 1,950,000$
Public Services 2,015,158$
Administration 714,103$
TOTAL FUNDS REQUESTED:7,006,237$
CDCIP Board Recommendations:
If a decrease in funding:
Administration Staff Analysis:
71-46099 $391,846.69
71-45099 $708,153.31
Total:$1,100,000.00
Total:-$
PROGRAM INCOME:
For Finance Purposes Only:
-$
Maximize admin at 20%, then allocate additional funding to Shelter The Homeless Homeless
Center Resource Meals up to 15% Public Services Cap, allocate remaining funds to Transportation
Bus Stop Improvements
COUNCIL:
4,670,517$
FUND AVAILABILITY
ESTIMATED GRANT AWARD:3,570,517$
REALLOCATION:1,100,000$
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE:4,670,517$
FUNDS ALLOCATED
MAYOR:
If an increase in funding:
COUNCIL:
-$ MAYOR:
4,670,517$ CDCIP:
CDCIP:
Maximize admin at 20%, reduce funding from Transportation Bus Stop Improvements, reduce
funding in Public Services from Advantage Services, but keep PS at 15% cap
REALLOCATION FUNDING:
4,670,517$
TOTALS
-$
AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION
CDBG Page 6
-$ Max Allowed for Part 1:179,560$
-$
326,267$
1 Catholic Community Services FY21-22 41,000$ REQUEST:50,000$
FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:-$
FY19-20 30,000$ MAYOR:-$
FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY17-18 30,000$
5 YR TOTAL 101,000$
2 Family Promise Salt Lake New REQUEST:56,984$
Community Family Shelter CDCIP:30,046$
MAYOR:30,046$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
3 First Step House FY21-22 49,250$ REQUEST:60,000$
FY20-21 60,000$ CDCIP:36,046$
FY19-20 50,000$ MAYOR:36,046$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
5 YR TOTAL 159,250$
4 Shelter the Homeless FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:88,000$
FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
5 YR TOTAL -$
5 Soap2Hope New REQUEST:295,280$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
5 YR TOTAL -$
6 The Road Home FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:30,000$
FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:-$
FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:-$
FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY17-18 -$
5 YR TOTAL -$
7 The Road Home FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:80,000$
FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:-$
FY19-20 40,000$ MAYOR:-$
FY18-19 66,384$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY17-18 58,123$
5 YR TOTAL 164,507$
8 The Road Home New REQUEST:50,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
9 Valley Behavioral Health New REQUEST:62,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
98.50
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
Street Outreach
Case management support for homeless and formerly homeless persons,
who have mental and behavioral health needs.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114 84.00Storefront/SafeHaven Case Manager
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114 93.83Provide outreach services to families experiencing homelessness across
Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County. Outreach workers will locate
homeless families and connect them to school systems for their children,
benefits, and housing.Homeless Services: Homeless outreach programs
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114 93.00Homeless Resource Center Utilities
First Step House will provide on-site behavioral health assessment,
referral, and peer support services to individuals at the Men's Homeless
Resource Center.
SALT LAKE CITY ESG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2022/2023
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME REQUEST/RECOMMENDED
% OF GRANT AWARD
Part 1 Funding: Street Outreach and Emergency Shelter:
Part 2 Funding: Homelessness Prevention, RRH, HMIS, and Admin:
2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
96.67
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
2022-2023 Funding Available:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS
STREET OUTREACH AND EMERGENCY SHELTER
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Operational support for the Weigand Homeless Resource Center, a day
shelter for individuals experiencing homelessness.
The FPSL family shelter program utilizes 12 Salt Lake Valley buildings to
shelter homeless families. Each shelter location houses 3-4 families at a
time for one week at a time.
Homeless Resource Center Program
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
Operational expenses for St. Vincent's de Paul Dining Hall as overflow
winter emergency shelter.
Shelter the Homeless (STH) is requesting ESG funding to assist with the
utilities for the two new Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs) in SLC.
The program’s primary goal is to provide street-based services to people
living on the street. By providing outreach services to high risk
individuals.
93.67
84.00
Emergency Shelter - St. Vincent's Overflow
Shelter
ESG- Gail Miller Resource Center
Soap2Hope Street Outreach Program
Homeless Services: Homeless outreach programs
Provide support for essential shelter services, including case management
and transportation. Also supporting shelter operations, maintenance,
rent, supplies, utilities, insurance, security, fuel, and equipment.
97.33
Weigand Homeless Resource Center Client
Intake/Operations
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
86.00
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
ESG Page 1
10 Volunteers of America, Utah FY21-22 30,000$ REQUEST:108,000$
FY20-21 38,000$ CDCIP:64,846$
MAYOR:64,846$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
5 YR TOTAL 38,000$
11 Volunteers of America, Utah FY21-22 44,000$ REQUEST:75,000$
FY20-21 46,000$ CDCIP:45,047$
FY19-20 44,115$ MAYOR:45,047$
FY18-19 60,000$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY17-18 45,992$
5 YR TOTAL 240,107$
REQUEST:955,264$ 319.20%
CDCIP:175,985$ 58.81%Max 60%
MAYOR:175,985$ 58.81%Max 60%
COUNCIL:-$ 0.00%Max 60%
1 FY21-22 40,000$ REQUEST:59,784$
FY20-21 30,000$ CDCIP:-$
FY19-20 53,000$ MAYOR:-$
FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Objective:
FY17-18 -$
5 YR TOTAL 123,000$
2 FY21-22 82,022$ REQUEST:121,974$
FY20-21 30,000$ CDCIP:46,021$
FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:46,021$
FY18-19 30,000$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Objective:
FY17-18 32,000$
5 YR TOTAL 174,022$
3 The Road Home FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:86,360$
FY20-21 40,765$ CDCIP:51,816$
FY19-20 84,077$ MAYOR:51,816$
FY18-19 85,382$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Objective:
FY17-18 85,508$
5 YR TOTAL 295,732$
4 The Road Home New REQUEST:30,000$
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Objective:
REQUEST:298,118$
CDCIP:127,837$
MAYOR:127,837$
COUNCIL:-$
1 Salt Lake City Corporation FY21-22 22,630$ REQUEST:22,445$
FY20-21 22,446$ CDCIP:22,445$
FY19-20 21,843$ MAYOR:22,445$
FY18-19 21,659$ COUNCIL:
FY17-18 18,666$
5 YR TOTAL 107,244$
REQUEST:1,275,827$
CDCIP:326,267$
MAYOR:326,267$
COUNCIL:-$
Operational and essential services of the VOA Youth Resource Center,
which serves homeless and at risk teens age 15-22.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114 98.17Homeless Youth Resource Center
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
Operational and service expenses for the Geraldine E. King Women's
Resource Center.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114 98.17Geraldine King Women's Resource Center
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
Provide assistance with housing costs for families facing financial
burderns and temporary loss of income, to prevent re-entry into
homelessness, and maintain their housing.
STREET OUTREACH AND EMERGENCY SHELTER TOTAL
7.5%
0.0%
7.5%
7.5%
Rapid Re-housing Program
Salt Lake Community Action dba Utah
Community Action
Salt Lake Community Action dba Utah
Community Action
*FUNDING FOR PART 1 CANNOT EXCEED $179,560
HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION, RAPID RE-HOUSING, AND HMIS
Diversion Program
Diversion program support in the form of salaries and operational
support. Diversion is a light-touch approach working to find safe,
alternatives for clients to remain in housing rather than entering into
shelter. Housing Programs: Rent assistance in the form of rapid
rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization
assistance
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 114
ADMINISTRATION
Rapid Re-Housing Program
Housing Programs: Rent assistance in the form of rapid
rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization
assistance
Provide case management support for individuals experiencing
homelessness through deposit and rental assistance and holistic case
management.
94.50
95.00
101.83
Housing Programs: Rent assistance in the form of rapid
rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization
assistance
Salary support for case managers in The Road Home’s Rapid Re-housing
Program working with participants, combined with short-term rental
assistance.
HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION, RAPID RE-HOUSING, HMIS, AND ADMINISTRATION
103.17
Housing Programs: Rent assistance in the form of rapid
rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization
assistance
HOMELESS PREVENTION & RAPID REHOUSING & HMIS TOTAL
Program Administration
Homelessness Prevention
To provide management, oversight, and monitoring of the ESG program.
Administration: 7.5% of ESG allocation.
ESG Page 2
1,275,827$
AVAILABLE TO ALLOCATE:
Estimated 22-23 GRANT AWARD:299,267$ CDCIP BOARD:326,267$ -$
REALLOCATION:27,000$ MAYOR:326,267$ -$
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $ 326,267 COUNCIL:-$ 326,267$
If an increase in funding
Maximize admin at 7.5%, and give ESG Part 1 agencies(VOA Youth
Resource Center, VOA GEK, First Step House Resource Center, and Family
Promise Community Family Shelter) funding spread out equally amongst
the selected four agencies, up to the ESG Part 1 cap.
If a decrease in funding
Maximize admin at 7.5%, and spread the decrease across the agencies as
long as it doesn't go under $30,000 per award.
72-62197 27,000.00$
Total:27,000.00$
CDCIP Board Recommendation:
AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION:FUNDS ALLOCATED:
Requested Funds
For Finance Purposes Only:Administration Staff Analysis:
REALLOCATION FUNDING:
ESG Page 3
Estimated 2022-2023 Funding Available:1,121,103$ Available to Allocate 1,121,103$
1 FY21-22 200,000$ REQUEST:374,800$
FY20-21 200,000$ HTFAB:200,000$
Down Payment Assistance FY19-20 200,000$ MAYOR:200,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY18-19 200,000$ COUNCIL:-$
FY17-18 150,000$
5 YR TOTAL 950,000$
2 Neighborworks New REQUEST:315,000$
Affordable Home Buydown Program HTFAB:-$
MAYOR:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
COUNCIL:-$
3 Salt Lake City Corporation FY21-22 984,634$ REQUEST:900,000$
Home Development Fund FY20-21 1,066,667$ HTFAB:317,448$
FY19-20 939,266$ MAYOR:317,448$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY18-19 1,061,368$ COUNCIL:-$
FY17-18 798,221$
5 YR TOTAL 4,850,156$
4 South Valley Sanctuary New REQUEST:138,500$ Combined Admin & HTFAB Score:
Maximum Score: 114HTFAB:138,500$
DV Survivor Housing Assistance MAYOR:138,500$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
COUNCIL:-$
5 The Road Home FY21-22 200,000$ REQUEST:300,000$
TBRA program FY20-21 200,000$ HTFAB:200,000$
FY19-20 200,000$ MAYOR:200,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY18-19 200,000$ COUNCIL:-$
FY17-18 200,000$
5 YR TOTAL 1,000,000$
6 Utah Community Action FY21-22 167,669$ REQUEST:177,699$
TBRA Program FY20-21 70,000$ HTFAB:167,669$
FY19-20 70,000$ MAYOR:167,669$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY18-19 70,000$ COUNCIL:-$
FY17-18 70,000$
5 YR TOTAL 447,669$
7 Salt Lake City Corporation FY21-22 97,486$ REQUEST:97,486$
Program Administration FY20-21 95,750$ HTFAB:97,486$
FY19-20 88,507$ MAYOR:97,486$
FY18-19 99,994$ COUNCIL:-$
FY17-18 71,357$
10% of Home Allocation 5 YR TOTAL 453,094$ 10% of HOME Award:97,486$
REQUEST:2,303,485$
HTFAB:1,121,103$
MAYOR:1,121,103$
COUNCIL:-$
Estimated 22-23 GRANT AWARD:974,863$
PROGRAM INCOME:-$
REALLOCATION:146,240.00$
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE:1,121,103$
If a decrease in funding
Maximize admin at 10%, then award the additional funds to SLC HOME
Development Fund
If an increase in funding
Maximize admin at 10% and reduce funds from SLC HOME Development
Fund 72-62198 146,240.00$
Total:146,240.00$
Total:-$
Direct aid in the form of grants/loans not to exceed each to first-time LMI
home buyers in Salt Lake City for down payment assistance.
Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition, new
construction, and rehabilitation of existing housing.
Combined Admin & HTFAB Score:
Maximum Score: 114 86.60
69.00
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide access
to home ownership via down paiyment assistance and/or
housing subsidy and/or financing.
Housing Programs: Housing development that increases
the nummber of units available for income eligible
residents (Acquistion, New Construction).
Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition, new
construction, and rehabilitation of existing housing.
89.60
COUNCIL:
For Finance Purposes Only:
REALLOCATION FUNDING:
HOUSING TRUST FUND ADVISORY BRD:
1,121,103$
-$
-$
Housing Programs: Housing development that increases
the nummber of units available for income eligible
residents (Acquistion, New Construction).
95.80Combined Admin & HTFAB Score:
Maximum Score: 114
97.40
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing,
homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance.
2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY HOME PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2022/2023
REQUEST/
RECOMMENDED
APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
Community Development Corporation of
Utah
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing,
homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance.
Combined Admin & HTFAB Score:
Maximum Score: 114 101.00
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing,
homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance.
Tenant Based Rental Assistance for eligible clients in The Road Home's
Rapid Re-housing Program.
Tenant Based Rental Assistance for survivors of domestic violence.
PROGRAM INCOME:
Combined Admin & HTFAB Score:
Maximum Score: 114
MAYOR:
FUND AVAILABILITY:AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION:
Funding to administer the HOME program (10% of the total HOME
allocation).
TOTAL
HTF Board Recommendation: Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation
Administration Staff Analysis:
Operational support, direct client rental assistance through Tenant Based
Rental Assistance.
Combined Admin & HTFAB Score:
Maximum Score: 114
HOME Page 1
Estimated 2022-2023 Funding Available: 910,126$ Available to Allocate 910,126$
1 Housing Connect FY21-22 489,332$ REQUEST:519,185$
Tenant Based Rental Assistance FY20-21 510,797$ HTFAB:519,185$
FY19-20 438,020$ MAYOR:519,185$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY18-19 321,015$ COUNCIL:-$
FY17-18 297,102$
5 YR TOTAL 2,056,266$
2 Utah AIDS Foundation FY21-22 30,000.00$ REQUEST:45,000$
HOPWA Supportive Services FY20-21 30,000$ HTFAB:70,000$
FY19-20 30,000$ MAYOR:70,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY18-19 30,000$ COUNCIL:-$
FY17-18 30,000$
5 YR TOTAL 150,000$
3 Utah AIDS Foundation FY21-22 50,000$ REQUEST:50,000$
Mental Health Services FY20-21 -$ HTFAB:100,000$
FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:100,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:-$
FY17-18 -$
5 YR TOTAL 50,000.00$
4 Utah Community Action FY21-22 85,099$ REQUEST:165,000$
STRMU/PHP/Supportive Services FY20-21 162,044$ HTFAB:195,736$
FY19-20 127,099$ MAYOR:195,736$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY18-19 142,501$ COUNCIL:-$
FY17-18 104,388$
5 YR TOTAL
5 Salt Lake City Corporation FY21-22 20,240$ REQUEST:25,205$
Program Administration FY20-21 18,026$ HTFAB:25,205$
FY19-20 16,003$ MAYOR:25,205$
FY18-19 14,166$ COUNCIL:-$
Administration: 3% of HOPWA allocation.FY17-18 12,505$
5 YR TOTAL 80,940$ 3% of HOPWA Award:25,205.88$
804,390$
910,126$
910,126$
-$
Estimated 2022-2023 GRANT AWARD: $ 840,196 -$
REALLOCATION:69,930$ -$
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE:910,126$ 910,126$
If a decrease Maximize admin at 3%, then reduce funds from UCA down to $165,000 72-61999 48,026.78$
72-62099 21,903.22$
Total:69,930.00$
Housing Programs: Support rent assistance programs to
emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and
end homelessness.
Housing Programs: Support rent assistance programs to
emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and
end homelessness.
102.20
102.20
98.00
97.80
Behavioral Health: Support programs that provide connection to
permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs.
COUNCIL:
MAYOR:
MAYOR:
COUNCIL:
REQUEST:
HOUSING TRUST FUND ADVISORY BRD:
Combined Admin & HTFAB Score:
Maximum Score: 114
Combined Admin & HTFAB Score:
Maximum Score: 114
FUND AVAILABILITY:AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION:
HOUSING TRUST FUND ADVISORY BRD:
TOTAL
Combined Admin & HTFAB Score:
Maximum Score: 114
Combined Admin & HTFAB Score:
Maximum Score: 114
Provides Mental Health Services to persons with HIV/AIDS
SALT LAKE CITY HOPWA PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2022/2023
AWARDS
Provides Supportive Services to persons with HIV/AIDS
APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION REQUEST/
RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLANPREVIOUS GRANT
To provide management, oversight, and monitoring of the HOPWA program.
Provides Tenant Based Rental Assistance to persons with HIV/AIDS
HTF Board Recommendation: The funds be awarded in the following manner as seen in the HTFAB Final Funding
Recommendation
Housing Programs: Support rent assistance programs to
emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and
end homelessness.
Provides short term rental, mortgage, and/or utilities assistance, permanent
housing placement, and supportive services to persons with HIV/AIDS
Administration Staff Analysis:
If an increase
Maximize admin at 3%, then award additional funds to UCA up to $235,000,
award any additional funds to Housing Connect
For Finance Purposes Only:
REALLOCATION FUNDING:
HOPWA Page 1
Item B1
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:March 1, 2022
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Item B-1 to a future Consent
Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: March 1, 2022
Action: March 22, 2022
MARY BETH THOMPSON
Finance Director
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: ___________
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: ___________
____________________________________________ ____________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: November 23, 2021
Amy Fowler
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
Katie Lewis, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Sustained occupation and usage of Salt Lake City Corporation property located at
54 Finch Lane, also known as the “Art Barn,” to Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation, a Utah
nonprofit corporation: Public Benefit Analysis under Utah Code Section 10-8-2.
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT: Randy Hillier, Policy and Budget Analyst (801) 535-6606,
Felicia Baca, Executive Director, Salt Lake City Arts Council, Taylor
Knuth, Deputy Director, Salt Lake City Arts Council or Megan DePaulis,
City Attorney (801) 535-7685
DOCUMENT TYPE: Public Benefits Analysis and Recommendation
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that a public hearing be held on the
matter of the Public Benefits Analysis and to consider adopting a resolution allowing the
sustained occupation and usage of the Salt Lake City Corporation property located at 54 Finch
Lane, also known as the “Art Barn” to the Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation.
BUDGET IMPACT: NA
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation & Arts Division is requesting to continue utilizing
54 Finch Lane, or the “Art Barn” as the administrative headquarters, housing 6.5 Arts Council
FTEs and multiple seasonal and part-time employees, as well as to provide a home for the Finch
Lane Art Gallery and its numerous exhibitions.
Katherine Lewis (Nov 23, 2021 18:11 MST)
rachel otto (Nov 24, 2021 07:07 MST)
Over the past 18+months, the Arts Council was tasked with formalizing an Operating Agreement
between the Arts Council Foundation and Salt Lake City. As part of this work, the Arts Council
completed drafts of the Operating Agreement, revised the Foundation Bylaws, and completed a
comprehensive Human Resource policies and procedures manual for the Salt Lake Arts Council
Foundation.
Although the Arts Council has utilized the Art Barn for decades, a Public Benefits Analysis, as
per Utah Code 10-8-2, has never been completed. With the completion of the newly formalized
operating agreement, the Attorney’s Office thought it would be appropriate to complete a Public
Benefits Analysis to satisfy the requirements of this code.
Utah Code 10-8-2 (1) (a) (v) states that after first holding a public hearing, a municipal
legislative body may authorize municipal services or other nonmonetary assistance to be
provided to or waive fees required to be paid by a nonprofit entity, whether or not the
municipality receives consideration in return.
While a study is not required under Utah Code 10-8-2 before the City can enter an agreement for
a below market value lease, it is beneficial to consider whether such an agreement will meet the
public benefit requirements under Utah Code 10-8-2.
The attached memo to Rachel Otto, Mayor’s Chief of Staff, outlines the public benefits identified
by the Administration that the City will realize from allowing the continued usage of the City-
owned 54 Finch Lane “Art Barn” as the primary administrative headquarters of the Salt Lake
City Foundation & Arts Division.
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rachel Otto
Chief of Staff
FROM: Felicia Baca
Executive Director
Salt Lake City Arts Council
DATE: March 16, 2021
SUBJECT: Sustained occupation and usage of Salt Lake City Corporation property located at
54 Finch Lane, also known as the “Art Barn,” to Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation, a Utah
nonprofit corporation: Public Benefit Analysis under Utah Code Section 10 -8-2.
____________________________________________________________________________________
In continuation of longstanding support from Salt Lake City since 1979, the Salt Lake Arts Council
Foundation & Arts Division respectfully requests the continued usage of the Art Barn in Salt Lake City as
both the administrative headquarters of 6.5 Salt Lake City Government staff and multiple seasonal and
part time employees of the Arts Council foundation. Additionally, maximizing efficient usage, this site
serves the community and local artists as the Finch Lane Art Gallery, home to exhibitions of diverse
emerging and established Utah artists since 1931. The Salt Lake City Arts Council has served as an
integral component of Salt Lake City as a governmental non-profit under Utah Code 11-13a-101.
Over the past 18+months, the Arts Council was tasked with formalizing an Operating Agreement between
the Arts Council Foundation and Salt Lake City, As part of this work, the Arts Council completed drafts of
the Operating Agreement, revised the Foundation Bylaws, and completed a comprehensive Human
Resource policies and procedures manual for the Salt Lake Arts Council Foundation.
Under Utah law, after first holding a public hearing, a municipality may “authorize municipal services or
other nonmonetary assistance to be provided to a nonprofit entity, whether or not the municipality
receives consideration in return.” Utah Code §10-8-2(1)(a)(v). Because Salt Lake City Arts Council is a
nonprofit entity, the City may waive the consideration it would ordinarily collect in exchange for
conveyance of the City Property so long as the municipal legislative body holds a public hearing and
authorizes the waiver.
Though a formal study is not required under Utah Code section 10-8-2(3)(e) for services or assistance
provided to a nonprofit entity after public hearing, an informal analysis considering the same factors as a
formal study is set forth below to assist the Salt Lake City Council in their consideration of the costs and
benefits of the requested waiver. Utah Code § 10-8-2(2)(a). Those factors are:
(1) The specific benefits (including intangible benefits) to be received by the City in return for
the arrangement;
(2) The City’s purpose in making the appropriation, including an analysis of how the safety,
health, prosperity, moral well-being, peace, order, comfort or convenience of the residents of Salt
Lake City will be enhanced; and
(3) Whether the appropriation is “necessary and appropriate” to accomplish the reasonable
goals and objectives of the City in the area of economic development, job creation, affo rdable
housing, blight elimination, resource center development, job preservation, the preservation of
historic structures and property, and any other public purpose.
See Utah Code §10-8-2(3)(e).
Background:
The Salt Lake Arts Council Foundation is a nonpr ofit organization that was established in November of
1979, under the direction of Mayor Ted Wilson, with objectives to promote and support artistic programs;
to ascertain community cultural needs; to facilitate community efforts in developing cultural and artistic
programs to reach the public in new ways in Salt Lake City; to act as the advisory body to the City in
relation to the arts; and to bridge communication between the cultural community and City government.
These objectives are related in City Ordinance Chapter 2.32, which connects the City to the nonprofit via
the appointment of board members by the Mayor and confirmation by the City Council, by defining the
responsibilities of the Executive Director, and by providing staff support to the Salt Lake City Arts Council.
The affairs of the Foundation are managed by a Board of Trustees who are also the officers of the Salt
Lake City Arts Council Board.
While the goals of the Arts Council have grown over the last forty-three years, these elements remain at
the core of the organization. City employees of the Arts Division manage the day-to-day operations of
programs and Division initiatives, with oversight and direction from both City Administration and
leadership of the Department of Economic Development. The Foundation is considered a component unit
of the City by the IRS, which means that the Foundation’s annual financial audit is considered as a par t of
the City’s annual financial audit. The City funds the Arts Council by providing funds in a City department
cost center, mainly consisting of salary and benefits, as well as through a non-departmental funding
contract with the Foundation for grantmaking and programming. The Foundation raises additional funding
from private donors/sponsors, other government entities, and through earned income.
Collaboratively, over the past 18+ months the City, and Foundation Board’s Executive and Governance
committees revisited the subject of this Operating Agreement. Board members and the Arts Council’s
Executive Director worked with Bruce White, an attorney at Parsons Behle & Latimer specializing in
nonprofit organizations and governmental non-profits to develop an updated draft of the Operating
Agreement in order to articulate this long standing relationship between the two entities. This draft was
presented to the City Attorney Megan DePaulis for review and comment in March 2020 (see in
References). The Bylaws for the Foundation (last updated in the 90’s) were also re-drafted to comply with
City ordinance and current best practice. In addition to this, a comprehensive Human Resources
handbook was contracted for the Foundation employees regarding policies and procedures specific to the
non-profit who employs non-City employees. The Operating Agreement and Bylaws revision are major
steppingstones in a mutually beneficial relationship.
On average, the Arts Council’s programs have reached approximately 100,000 individual au dience
members and over 1,000 artists per year. These programs are intended to serve residents along the
Wasatch Front, with a focus on the Salt Lake County area. However, events such as the Living Traditions
Festival attract attendees from across Utah and throughout the region. Programs are thoughtfully curated
each year with the intention of supporting artists and arts organizations and making Salt Lake City a more
vibrant, equitable, and engaging place to live.
The Arts Council’s programs:
Finch Lane Gallery hosts year-round visual art exhibitions in three gallery spaces at the historic Art Barn
in Reservoir Park. The gallery gives local artists an opportunity to exhibit a current body of work, explore
exhibition themes or media relevant to the community and field of arts at large, and foster the
development of curatorial skills through exhibition production and collaboration. Through a new initiative,
Flash Projects, the Gallery opened its spaces for short-term, interdisciplinary, community-oriented, and/or
experimental projects in 2020. In response to COVID-19, the Gallery is currently hosting exhibitions
online, virtual experiences, as well as limited in-person gallery visits by appointment only.
Living Traditions Presents features the traditional artforms of Salt Lake’s native, immigrant, and
ethnically diverse communities. Over the years, program offerings have been expanded in an effort to
reach more geographically diverse communities in typical programming years, this includes a three-day
festival; Mondays in the Park, a concert series throughout the summer at the Chase Home in Liberty
Park; hands-on workshops with traditional folk artists at libraries and community centers throughout Salt
Lake; and a summer end Garden Party which is a smaller festival event at Jordan Park. We hope that
future years will allow us to continue this series of events. We have budgeted for these events in 2020-
2021 in the event social distancing changes are made, but for now these events have been postponed or
modified.
Twilight Concert Series is a music concert series presented each summer featuring nationally
recognized and upcoming musicians from across the country and around the world. The series is held at
the Gallivan Center and produced through a more sustainable private partnership that ensures continued
access to residents and enables the Arts Council to focus on more diversity in its general programming.
Musical acts are prioritized on the basis of diversity through both musical genres and those that
represent, speak to, and serve as role models to multiple communities including underrepresented
demographics. For almost 35 years the Twilight Concert Series has brought communities together to
share this experience, creating a vibrant and relevant downtown atmospher e, and promoting Salt Lake
City through the arts. The 2020 series was cancelled due to COVID -19, but our new and modified efforts
are expanded on in the description below.
Outreach and Engagement is a priority for our organization. The Salt Lake Arts Council provides
additional professional development and activation opportunities to local performing artists to engage with
audiences through such programs as the Brown Bag Concert Series and Busker Festival, among others.
These programs contribute to the cultural vibrancy of public parks, plazas and businesses by creating
temporary placemaking. Modified presentations in 2020 included the Cultural Caravan, which was a
traveling pop-up version of the Busker Festival and presented with social distancing measures in place in
all seven City Council Districts. Additionally, the Art Barn serves as a facility that can be rented by the
community and that other City agencies can utilize for meetings and events. A variety of venue rentals
and partnerships facilitate long standing Literary Arts programs in the community. In 2020 in response to
the pandemic, the Arts Council partnered with Emergency Management and the Salt Lake City School
district to act as a food distribution center for families in need. Recent partnership s and programs related
to exhibition at Finch Lane have facilitated tree plantings in Reservoir Park, and trainings related to
exhibitions on Suicide Prevention and Domestic Abuse Survivor Training.
Salt Lake City’s Public Art Program provides opportunities for artists to create site-specific artwork that
enhances or is integrated into public buildings and spaces. Approximately four new projects are
commissioned each year with 2019 resulting in the installation of the State’s largest dollar art commission
in history. The Arts Council recognizes that art in public spaces reflects the history, culture, and pride of
our people and civic spaces.
City Arts Grants Program supports the arts activities of artists, arts organizations, nonprofits, and
elementary schools conducting programming across Salt Lake City through five grant categories. The
City Arts Grant program allows the Arts Council to reach more geographically diverse areas, support
multiple artistic disciplines, and fill gaps that may exist in education and programming for residents.
Technical Assistance, Services, & Research Arts Council staff members have expertise in various
artistic disciplines and provide assistance to artists, organizations, and community members through
communication efforts (such as a monthly newsletter, website blog posts, and a strong social-media
presence), technical assistance (by providing on-site support to performing arts partners, artist
consultation, and by serving on committees and boards), and through referrals. Additionally, the
organization participates in national studies such as the Americans for the Arts & Economic Prosperity® V
study and conducts local-level research for the benefit of the arts and creative industries.
The City Property:
The City Property in question consists of approximately 7,000 leasable square feet on .34 acres with a
fair market lease value (based upon an average price per square foot formula comparing approximately
nine similar facilities in the area) of approximately $194,250 averaged at market rate provided by Real
Estate Services at $27.75 per square foot See highlighted parcel on diagram below.
A Brief History of the Art Barn:
The Art Barn was built during the Great Depression with assistance from the City of Salt Lake, the federal
Works Projects Administration, private contributors, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Alta Rawlins Jensen was one of the visionaries who worked toward the building of a community arts
center that was described in the Salt Lake Telegram as “A Greenwich Village for Salt Lake.” Ms. Jensen
believed that despite desperate economic times, an art center could help to lift the spirit and rekindle the
dreams of the community.
In March of 1931, the Salt Lake City Commission gave the Art Barn founding group permission to build in
Reservoir Park. Designed by architect Taylor Woolley, a former associate of Frank Lloyd Wright, the Art
Barn’s projected construction cost was $10,000. The groundbreaking took place in October 1931, and the
cornerstone was laid in December of the same year. Difficulties in raising the funds necessary to
complete construction delayed the official opening until June 11, 1933. Governor Henry H. Blood and
Mayor Louis Marcus addressed the crowd that filled the building and the lawn surrounding it. The Art Barn
has been a significant community center for arts activities since that time.
The road that runs through Reservoir Park in front of the Art Barn, at the insistence of the founders, was
named Finch Lane to honor the Commissioner of City Parks, Harry L. Finch. Commissioner Finch had
been instrumental in securing the property from the City at a lease rate of $1 per year, and in obtaining
the Federal funds to hire unemployed laborers for this public building project.
In its 90th anniversary year, this space has touched thousands of people, serving artists of all disciplines
and those who experienced their work. Not only has the physical facility survived, with occasional
renovations and additions, but it is still serving the public as its founders intended.
Benefits to Salt Lake City:
All Arts Council programs and services are provided at no charge or at an affordable, low cost to the
public (Twilight Concert Series). Annually, the Arts Council obtains operating and programming funding
from numerous resources, including federal, state, county, and private funding with Salt Lake City
providing on average 65% of our total support. In late 2018 Union Creative Agency analyzed the
operating model of the organization reporting, “The hybrid model has potential to be a premier and
innovative model for Local Arts Agencies. While this model may require more work and development than
simpler models, it has the capacity to deliver unprecedented impact.” This hybrid model of operations,
recently also adopted by the State’s Utah Department of Heritage and Arts as an innovative model,
benefits the City and residents in myriad ways:
● Ability to fundraise a significant portion of the funds that support programming and
staff, creating a direct benefit to residents through leveraging City dollars.
● Wide community buy-in from other government and private funders both national
and local. Increases accountability to community and public when funding sources are
diverse.
● Procurement and commissioning procedures that are effective for best practices in
the field, resulting in responsiveness, efficiency, and effective partner collaboration-in
particular when it comes to executing on issues of equity and inclusion.
● Ability to engage in Citywide issues relevant to the community through Mayor, City
Departments, etc. Effective collaboration, access to information, and resources.
● Mission as an Arts Council to fill niche gaps, incubate, and fulfill community needs.
● Staff and public presence at the facility maintain a constant presence and
awareness in Reservoir Park, as many parks in Salt Lake City see usage by unsheltered
populations, as well as an active University of Utah Student population nearby.
Accomplishing Salt Lake City’s Goals:
The Salt Lake City Arts Council recently completed a 5-year strategic plan in concert with the Salt Lake
City Arts Council Board, Mayor, Department of Economic Development, and multi-year stakeholder
engagement process involving residents, stakeholders and City Departments. Additionally, the Executive
Director is tasked with implementation of the goals of PLAN SLC, the Mayor’s Current Plans, and guiding
strategic plans and policies of the Department of Economic Development. The Board of the Salt Lake City
Arts Council acts as an advisory body to the City in all matters pertaining to the arts and cultural
development of the City.
● FELICIA DROP IN A FEW GOALS RELATED TO THIS…
● Streamline City art initiatives and improve the structure and funding of the Arts Council (Mayor’s
Plan 2021)
● Ensure access to, and support for, a diversity of cultural facilities citywide.(Plan SLC)
● Increase Overall Participation in arts and cultural activities (Plan SLC)
● Strengthen Organization Health and Development (Salt Lake City Arts Council Strategic Plan)
Below is a breakdown of funding sources from the previous three years.
FY 2018-2019 FY 2019-2020 FY 2020-2021 FY 2020-2021
ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROVED
BUDGET
APPROVED
AMENDED
BUDGET
CITY REVENUE 1,149,148.00 1,063,941.00 1,223,801.00 1,411,437.00
CONTRIBUTIONS 107,514.24 8,188.10 110,000.00 139,645.00
EARNED INCOME 136,288.76 106,823.98 46,250.00 18,500.00
GOVERNMENT GRANTS 409,054.45 345,980.00 304,552.00 505,647.00
OTHER REVENUE 10,622.36 4,013.65 2,505.00 5,160.00
TOTAL REVENUE $ 1,812,627.81 $ 1,528,946.73 $ 1,687,108.00 $ 2,080,389.00
The Arts Council receives funding from Salt Lake City’s Non-departmental each year to help with the
expenses of managing the Art Barn facility. In FY19 and FY20 support was given at $7,500 and in FY21
support was at $10,000. The Arts Council Foundation uses this funding to pay for the building utilities.
The Arts Council Foundation also incurs the cost of monthly building cleaning, building security, and
purchases building supplies such as cleaning products, bathroom paper supplies, and PPE.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, we would like to take this opportunity to thank both the City Administration and the City
Council for this opportunity to present our Public Benefits Analysis for the Salt Lake City Arts Council. We
have demonstrated in this document that the Salt Lake City Arts Council and Salt Lake City Arts Council
Foundation provide a clear, direct, and substantial benefit to not only Salt Lake City Residents and
Visitors, but to the Greater Salt Lake City Area. Additionally, we believe that our hybrid structure as both a
division of Salt Lake City Government and as a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization provides an excellent
example of; (1) robust and healthy public-nonprofit partnerships to our industry at large,(2) remarkable
stewardship of public funds, (3) innovative and solutions focused business practices, and (4) sustainable
and inclusive organizational structure. In closing, we invite any member of the Administration or Council,
as well as members of the general public, to request additional information to clarify any remaining
questions you might have regarding our Public Benefits Analysis. Thank you!
References:
Draft Operating Agreement
Draft Salt Lake Arts Council Foundation Bylaws
Articles of Incorporation and supporting City documents establishing the agency
Salt Lake City Arts Council Board Chapter 2.32 (City Ordinance)
Salt Lake Arts Council Foundation Bylaws (current)
City Commission Minutes 1976 Establishment of Arts Council
RESOLUTION NO. _____ OF 2021
A Resolution Authorizing the Waiver of Lease Fees for the Use of the Art Barn by the Salt Lake
City Arts Council Foundation
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation (“City”) desires to execute a below-market rate
lease agreement (the “Nonmonetary Assistance”) with the Salt Lake City Arts Council
Foundation, a Utah nonprofit corporation (“Foundation”) for use of the Art Barn located at 54
Finch Lane (“Art Barn”); and
WHEREAS, the Foundation utilizes the Art Barn as its administrative headquarters,
which allows the Foundation to operate in furtherance of its objectives in promoting and
supporting the arts in the community as outlined under Salt Lake City Code 2.32; and
WHEREAS, Utah Code Section 10-8-2(1)(a)(v) allows a municipal corporation to provide
nonmonetary assistance to and waive fees for nonprofit entities, such as the Foundation, after first
holding a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, although Utah Code Section 10-8-2 does not require a study for such
nonmonetary assistance to a nonprofit entity, the City has voluntarily performed an informal
analysis setting forth the benefits afforded to Salt Lake City residents and how the Nonmonetary
Assistance for the Foundation’s use of the Art Barn facilitate provision of such benefits and the
achievement of the Salt Lake City Arts Council’s goals outlined under City Code 2.32
(“Analysis”), which Analysis was included in the transmittal to the City Council and made publicly
available before the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the Analysis and has fully considered all
comments made during the public hearing.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as
follows:
1. The City Council hereby adopts the conclusions set forth in the Analysis, and
hereby finds and determines that, for the reasons set forth in the Analysis, the Nonmonetary
Assistance is appropriate.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of _________, 2021.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By: ______________________
CHAIRPERSON
2
ATTEST:
____________________________
CITY RECORDER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
______________________________
Sara Montoya, Senior City Attorney
Date: ______________________ November 23, 2021
MARY BETH THOMPSON
Finance Director
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: ___________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ___________
____________________________________________ ____________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 21, 2022
Dan Dugan
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
Katie Lewis, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Sustained occupation and usage of Salt Lake City Corporation property located at
54 Finch Lane, also known as the “Art Barn,” to Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation, a Utah
nonprofit corporation: Public Benefit Analysis under Utah Code Section 10-8-2.
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT: Randy Hillier, Policy and Budget Analyst (801) 535-6606,
Felicia Baca, Executive Director, Salt Lake City Arts Council, Taylor
Knuth, Deputy Director, Salt Lake City Arts Council or Sara Montoya,
City Attorney (801) 535-7685
DOCUMENT TYPE: Public Benefits Analysis and Recommendation (Revised to correct
typographical error)
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that a public hearing be held on the
matter of the Public Benefits Analysis and to consider adopting a resolution allowing the
sustained occupation and usage of the Salt Lake City Corporation property located at 54 Finch
Lane, also known as the “Art Barn” to the Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation.
BUDGET IMPACT: NA
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation & Arts Division is requesting to continue utilizing
54 Finch Lane, or the “Art Barn” as the administrative headquarters, housing 6.5 Arts Council
FTEs and multiple seasonal and part-time employees, as well as to provide a home for the Finch
Lane Art Gallery and its numerous exhibitions.
Katherine Lewis (Jan 21, 2022 12:35 MST)
Lisa Shaffer (Jan 28, 2022 15:54 MST)
Over the past 18+months, the Arts Council was tasked with formalizing an Operating Agreement
between the Arts Council Foundation and Salt Lake City. As part of this work, the Arts Council
completed drafts of the Operating Agreement, revised the Foundation Bylaws, and completed a
comprehensive Human Resource policies and procedures manual for the Salt Lake Arts Council
Foundation.
Although the Arts Council has utilized the Art Barn for decades, a Public Benefits Analysis, as
per Utah Code 10-8-2, has never been completed. With the completion of the newly formalized
operating agreement, the Attorney’s Office thought it would be appropriate to complete a Public
Benefits Analysis to satisfy the requirements of this code.
Utah Code 10-8-2 (1) (a) (v) states that after first holding a public hearing, a municipal
legislative body may authorize municipal services or other nonmonetary assistance to be
provided to or waive fees required to be paid by a nonprofit entity, whether or not the
municipality receives consideration in return.
While a study is not required under Utah Code 10-8-2 before the City can enter an agreement for
a below market value lease, it is beneficial to consider whether such an agreement will meet the
public benefit requirements under Utah Code 10-8-2.
The attached memo to Rachel Otto, Mayor’s Chief of Staff, outlines the public benefits identified
by the Administration that the City will realize from allowing the continued usage of the City-
owned 54 Finch Lane “Art Barn” as the primary administrative headquarters of the Salt Lake
City Foundation & Arts Division.
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lisa Shaffer
Chief Administrative Officer
FROM: Felicia Baca
Executive Director
Salt Lake City Arts Council
DATE: January 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Sustained occupation and usage of Salt Lake City Corporation property located at
54 Finch Lane, also known as the “Art Barn,” to Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation, a Utah
nonprofit corporation: Public Benefit Analysis under Utah Code Section 10 -8-2.
____________________________________________________________________________________
In continuation of longstanding support from Salt Lake City since 1979, the Salt Lake Arts Council
Foundation & Arts Division respectfully requests the continued usage of the Art Barn in Salt Lake City as
both the administrative headquarters of 6.5 Salt Lake City Government staff and multiple seasonal and
part time employees of the Arts Council foundation. Additionally, maximizing efficient usage, this site
serves the community and local artists as the Finch Lane Art Gallery, home to exhibitio ns of diverse
emerging and established Utah artists since 1931. The Salt Lake City Arts Council has served as an
integral component of Salt Lake City as a governmental non-profit under Utah Code 11-13a-101.
Over the past 18+months, the Arts Council was tasked with formalizing an Operating Agreement between
the Arts Council Foundation and Salt Lake City, As part of this work, the Arts Council completed drafts of
the Operating Agreement, revised the Foundation Bylaws, and completed a comprehensive Human
Resource policies and procedures manual for the Salt Lake Arts Council Foundation.
Under Utah law, after first holding a public hearing, a municipality may “authorize municipal services or
other nonmonetary assistance to be provided to a nonprofit entity, whether or not the municipality
receives consideration in return.” Utah Code §10-8-2(1)(a)(v). Because Salt Lake City Arts Council is a
nonprofit entity, the City may waive the consideration it would ordinarily collect in exchange for
conveyance of the City Property so long as the municipal legislative body holds a public hearing and
authorizes the waiver.
Though a formal study is not required under Utah Code section 10-8-2(3)(e) for services or assistance
provided to a nonprofit entity after public hearing, an informal analysis considering the same factors as a
formal study is set forth below to assist the Salt Lake City Council in their consideration of the costs and
benefits of the requested waiver. Utah Code § 10-8-2(2)(a). Those factors are:
(1) The specific benefits (including intangible benefits) to be received by the City in return for
the arrangement;
(2) The City’s purpose in making the appropriation, including an analysis of how the safety,
health, prosperity, moral well-being, peace, order, comfort or convenience of the
residents of Salt Lake City will be enhanced; and
(3) Whether the appropriation is “necessary and appropriate” to accomplish the reasonable
goals and objectives of the City in the area of economic development, job creation,
affordable housing, blight elimination, resource center development, job preservation, the
preservation of historic structures and property, and any other public purpose.
See Utah Code §10-8-2(3)(e).
Background:
The Salt Lake Arts Council Foundation is a nonprofit organization that was established in November of
1979, under the direction of Mayor Ted Wilson, with objectives to promote and support artistic programs;
to ascertain community cultural needs; to facilitate community efforts in developing cultural and artistic
programs to reach the public in new ways in Salt Lake City; to act as the advisory body to the City in
relation to the arts; and to bridge communication between the cultural community and City government.
These objectives are related in City Ordinance Chapter 2.32, which connects the City to the nonprofit via
the appointment of board members by the Mayor and confirmation by the City Council, by defining the
responsibilities of the Executive Director, and by providing staff support to the Salt Lake City Arts Council.
The affairs of the Foundation are managed by a Board of Trustees who are also the officers of the Salt
Lake City Arts Council Board.
While the goals of the Arts Council have grown over the last forty-three years, these elements remain at
the core of the organization. City employees of the Arts Division manage the day-to-day operations of
programs and Division initiatives, with oversight and direction from both City Administration and
leadership of the Department of Economic Development. The Foundation is c onsidered a component unit
of the City by the IRS, which means that the Foundation’s annual financial audit is considered as a part of
the City’s annual financial audit. The City funds the Arts Council by providing funds in a City department
cost center, mainly consisting of salary and benefits, as well as through a non-departmental funding
contract with the Foundation for grantmaking and programming. The Foundation raises additional funding
from private donors/sponsors, other government entities, and through earned income.
Collaboratively, over the past 18+ months the City, and Foundation Board’s Executive and Governance
committees revisited the subject of this Operating Agreement. Board members and the Arts Council’s
Executive Director worked with Bruce White, an attorney at Parsons Behle & Latimer specializing in
nonprofit organizations and governmental non-profits to develop an updated draft of the Operating
Agreement in order to articulate this long standing relationship between the two entities. This draft was
presented to the City Attorney Megan DePaulis for review and comment in March 2020 (see in
References). The Bylaws for the Foundation (last updated in the 90’s) were also re-drafted to comply with
City ordinance and current best practice. In addition to this, a comprehensive Human Resources
handbook was contracted for the Foundation employees regarding policies and procedures specific to the
non-profit who employs non-City employees. The Operating Agreement and Bylaws revision are major
steppingstones in a mutually beneficial relationship.
On average, the Arts Council’s programs have reached approximately 100,000 individual audience
members and over 1,000 artists per year. These programs are intended to serve residents along the
Wasatch Front, with a focus on the Salt Lake County area. However, events such as the Living Traditions
Festival attract attendees from across Utah and throughout the region. Programs are thoughtfully curated
each year with the intention of supporting artists and arts organizations and making Salt Lake City a more
vibrant, equitable, and engaging place to live.
The Arts Council’s programs:
Finch Lane Gallery hosts year-round visual art exhibitions in three gallery spaces at the historic Art Barn
in Reservoir Park. The gallery gives local artists an opportunity to exhibit a current body of work, explore
exhibition themes or media relevant to the community and field of arts at large, and foster the
development of curatorial skills through exhibition production and collaboration. T hrough a new initiative,
Flash Projects, the Gallery opened its spaces for short-term, interdisciplinary, community-oriented, and/or
experimental projects in 2020. In response to COVID-19, the Gallery is currently hosting exhibitions
online, virtual experiences, as well as limited in-person gallery visits by appointment only.
Living Traditions Presents features the traditional artforms of Salt Lake’s native, immigrant, and
ethnically diverse communities. Over the years, program offerings have been expanded in an effort to
reach more geographically diverse communities in typical programming years, this includes a three-day
festival; Mondays in the Park, a concert series throughout the summer at the Chase Home in Liberty
Park; hands-on workshops with traditional folk artists at libraries and community centers throughout Salt
Lake; and a summer end Garden Party which is a smaller festival event at Jordan Park. We hope that
future years will allow us to continue this series of events. We have budgeted for these events in 2020-
2021 in the event social distancing changes are made, but for now these events have been postponed or
modified.
Twilight Concert Series is a music concert series presented each summer featuring nationally
recognized and upcoming musicians from across the country and around the world. The series is held at
the Gallivan Center and produced through a more sustainable private partnership that ensures continued
access to residents and enables the Arts Council to focus on more diversity in its gene ral programming.
Musical acts are prioritized on the basis of diversity through both musical genres and those that
represent, speak to, and serve as role models to multiple communities including underrepresented
demographics. For almost 35 years the Twilight Concert Series has brought communities together to
share this experience, creating a vibrant and relevant downtown atmosphere, and promoting Salt Lake
City through the arts. The 2020 series was cancelled due to COVID -19, but our new and modified efforts
are expanded on in the description below.
Outreach and Engagement is a priority for our organization. The Salt Lake Arts Council provides
additional professional development and activation opportunities to local performing artists to engage with
audiences through such programs as the Brown Bag Concert Series and Busker Festival, among others.
These programs contribute to the cultural vibrancy of public parks, plazas and businesses by creating
temporary placemaking. Modified presentations in 2020 included the Cultural Caravan, which was a
traveling pop-up version of the Busker Festival and presented with social distancing measures in place in
all seven City Council Districts. Additionally, the Art Barn serves as a facility that can be rented by the
community and that other City agencies can utilize for meetings and events. A variety of venue rentals
and partnerships facilitate long standing Literary Arts programs in the community. In 2020 in response to
the pandemic, the Arts Council partnered with Emergency Management and the Salt Lake City School
district to act as a food distribution center for families in need. Recent partnerships and programs related
to exhibition at Finch Lane have facilitated tree plantings in Reservoir Park, and trainings related to
exhibitions on Suicide Prevention and Domestic Abuse Survivor Training.
Salt Lake City’s Public Art Program provides opportunities for artists to create site-specific artwork that
enhances or is integrated into public buildings and spaces. Approximately four new projects are
commissioned each year with 2019 resulting in the installation of the State’s largest dollar art commission
in history. The Arts Council recognizes that art in public spaces reflects the history, culture, and pride of
our people and civic spaces.
City Arts Grants Program supports the arts activities of artists, arts organizations, nonprofits, and
elementary schools conducting programming across Salt Lake City through five grant categories. The
City Arts Grant program allows the Arts Council to reach more geographically diverse areas, support
multiple artistic disciplines, and fill gaps that may exist in education and programming for residents.
Technical Assistance, Services, & Research Arts Council staff members have expertise in various
artistic disciplines and provide assistance to artists, organizations, and community members through
communication efforts (such as a monthly newsletter, website blog posts, and a strong social-media
presence), technical assistance (by providing on-site support to performing arts partners, artist
consultation, and by serving on committees and boards), and through referrals. Additionally, the
organization participates in national studies such as the Americans for the Arts & Economic Prosperity® V
study and conducts local-level research for the benefit of the arts and creative industries.
The City Property:
The City Property in question consists of approximately 7,000 leasable square feet on .34 acres with a
fair market lease value (based upon an average price per square foot formula comparing approximately
nine similar facilities in the area) of approximately $194,250 averaged at market rate provided by Real
Estate Services at $27.75 per square foot See highlighted parcel on diagram below.
A Brief History of the Art Barn:
The Art Barn was built during the Great Depression with assistance from the City of Salt Lake, the federal
Works Projects Administration, private contributors, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Alta Rawlins Jensen was one of the visionaries who worked toward the building of a community arts
center that was described in the Salt Lake Telegram as “A Greenwich Village for Salt Lake.” Ms. Jensen
believed that despite desperate economic times, an art center could help to lift the spirit and rekindle the
dreams of the community.
In March of 1931, the Salt Lake City Commission gave the Art Barn founding group permission to build in
Reservoir Park. Designed by architect Taylor Woolley, a former associate of Frank Lloyd Wright, the Art
Barn’s projected construction cost was $10,000. The groundbreaking took place in October 1931, and the
cornerstone was laid in December of the same year. Difficulties in raising the funds necessary to
complete construction delayed the official opening until June 11, 1933. Governor Henry H. Blood and
Mayor Louis Marcus addressed the crowd that filled the building and the lawn surrounding it. The Art Barn
has been a significant community center for arts activities since that time.
The road that runs through Reservoir Park in front of the Art Barn, at the insistence of the founders, was
named Finch Lane to honor the Commissioner of City Parks, Harry L. Finch. Commissioner Finch had
been instrumental in securing the property from the City at a lease rate of $1 per year, and in obtaining
the Federal funds to hire unemployed laborers for this public building project.
In its 90th anniversary year, this space has touched thousands of people, serving artists of all disciplines
and those who experienced their work. Not only has the physical facility survived, with occasional
renovations and additions, but it is still serving the public as its founders intended.
Benefits to Salt Lake City:
All Arts Council programs and services are provided at no charge or at an affordable, low cost to the
public (Twilight Concert Series). Annually, the Arts Council obtains operating and programming funding
from numerous resources, including federal, state, county, and private funding with Salt Lake City
providing on average 65% of our total support. In late 2018 Union Creative Agency analyzed the
operating model of the organization reporting, “The hybrid model has potential to be a premier and
innovative model for Local Arts Agencies. While this model may require more work and development than
simpler models, it has the capacity to deliver unprecedented impact.” This hybrid model of operations,
recently also adopted by the State’s Utah Department of Heritage and Arts as an innovative model,
benefits the City and residents in myriad ways:
● Ability to fundraise a significant portion of the funds that support programming and
staff, creating a direct benefit to residents through leveraging City dollars.
● Wide community buy-in from other government and private funders both national
and local. Increases accountability to community and public when funding sources are
diverse.
● Procurement and commissioning procedures that are effective for best practices in
the field, resulting in responsiveness, efficiency, and effective partner collaboration -in
particular when it comes to executing on issues of equity and inclusion.
● Ability to engage in Citywide issues relevant to the community through Mayor, City
Departments, etc. Effective collaboration, access to information, and resources.
● Mission as an Arts Council to fill niche gaps, incubate, and fulfill comm unity needs.
● Staff and public presence at the facility maintain a constant presence and
awareness in Reservoir Park, as many parks in Salt Lake City see usage by unsheltered
populations, as well as an active University of Utah Student population nea rby.
Accomplishing Salt Lake City’s Goals:
The Salt Lake City Arts Council recently completed a 5-year strategic plan in concert with the Salt Lake
City Arts Council Board, Mayor, Department of Economic Development, and multi-year stakeholder
engagement process involving residents, stakeholders and City Departments. Additionally, the Executive
Director is tasked with implementation of the goals of PLAN SLC, the Mayor’s Current Plans, and guiding
strategic plans and policies of the Department of Economic Development. The Board of the Salt Lake City
Arts Council acts as an advisory body to the City in all matters pertaining to the arts and cultural
development of the City.
● Streamline City art initiatives and improve the structure and funding of the Arts Council (Mayor’s
Plan 2021)
● Ensure access to, and support for, a diversity of cultural facilities citywide.(Plan SLC)
● Increase Overall Participation in arts and cultural activities (Plan SLC)
● Strengthen Organization Health and Development (Salt Lake City Arts Council Strategic Plan)
Below is a breakdown of funding sources from the previous three years.
FY 2018-2019 FY 2019-2020 FY 2020-2021 FY 2020-2021
ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROVED
BUDGET
APPROVED
AMENDED
BUDGET
CITY REVENUE 1,149,148.00 1,063,941.00 1,223,801.00 1,411,437.00
CONTRIBUTIONS 107,514.24 8,188.10 110,000.00 139,645.00
EARNED INCOME 136,288.76 106,823.98 46,250.00 18,500.00
GOVERNMENT GRANTS 409,054.45 345,980.00 304,552.00 505,647.00
OTHER REVENUE 10,622.36 4,013.65 2,505.00 5,160.00
TOTAL REVENUE $ 1,812,627.81 $ 1,528,946.73 $ 1,687,108.00 $ 2,080,389.00
The Arts Council receives funding from Salt Lake City’s Non-departmental each year to help with the
expenses of managing the Art Barn facility. In FY19 and FY20 support was given at $7,500 and in FY21
support was at $10,000. The Arts Council Foundation uses this funding to pay for the building utilities.
The Arts Council Foundation also incurs the cost of monthly building cleaning, building security, and
purchases building supplies such as cleaning products, bathroom paper supplies, and PPE.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, we would like to take this opportunity to thank both the City Administration and the City
Council for this opportunity to present our Public Benefits Analysis for the Salt Lake City Arts Council. We
have demonstrated in this document that the Salt Lake City Arts Council and Salt Lake City Arts Council
Foundation provide a clear, direct, and substantial benefit to not only Salt Lake City Residents and
Visitors, but to the Greater Salt Lake City Area. Additionally, we believe that our hybrid st ructure as both a
division of Salt Lake City Government and as a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization provides an excellent
example of; (1) robust and healthy public-nonprofit partnerships to our industry at large,(2) remarkable
stewardship of public funds, (3) innovative and solutions focused business practices, and (4) sustainable
and inclusive organizational structure. In closing, we invite any member of the Administration or Council,
as well as members of the general public, to request additional information to clarify any remaining
questions you might have regarding our Public Benefits Analysis. Thank you!
References:
Draft Operating Agreement
Draft Salt Lake Arts Council Foundation Bylaws
Articles of Incorporation and supporting City documents establishing the agency
Salt Lake City Arts Council Board Chapter 2.32 (City Ordinance)
Salt Lake Arts Council Foundation Bylaws (current)
City Commission Minutes 1976 Establishment of Arts Council
Item B2
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards
Budget Analysts
DATE:March 1, 2022
RE: Budget Amendment Number Six FY22
MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AND PARTIALLY ADOPT
(See Motion 2 and 3 for items some Council Members requested be voted on separately)
I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt an ordinance amending the FY 2021-22 final
budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document only for items as shown on the
motion sheet.
Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the individual items being approved below; they are
listed for reference. The budget amendment is still open, and the remaining items are held for more
information and discussions.
A-1: Suazo Membership ($18,750 from General Fund Balance)
-Note this would be nine-months funding to bring the ongoing cost into alignment with the
City’s annual budget cycle; the Council requests that the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for
FY2023 include full year funding
A-2: Move Grants Manager from ARPA to General Fund ($66,000 from General Fund Balance)
A-4: Fix the Bricks Transfer Grant Funded FTE and Program from Fire Department to Department of
Community & Neighborhoods (Budget Neutral)
A-5: Additional Police Sergeant FTE for Special Victims Unit ($135,971 from General Fund Balance)
A-6: Police Access Control Upgrade and Support ($214,538 from General Fund Balance)
A-10: Allen Park Plan CIP Project Rescope (Budget Neutral)
A-11: Executive Assistant in the Mayor’s Office ($39,792 from General Fund Balance)
A-12: Citywide Equity Study ($90,000 from General Fund Balance)
A-13: Fleet Fuel Cost Increases ($938,076 to Fleet Fund from Several Sources)
A-14: COVID Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) ($200,000 from General Fund Balance)
B-1: ARPA HOME Admin and Planning Funds ($176,660 from HOME-ARPA in Miscellaneous Grants
Fund to the General Fund to Offset Eligible Expenses)
-Note these funds would be for switching the source for an existing contract that encumbered
FY2021 General Fund dollars and the rest to make the General Fund whole for existing
personnel expenses eligible under the grant
D-1: Interest Income on Bonding ($64,140 and $80,977 from CIP Fund)
D-3: Reimburse Miscellaneous Grants for Unreimbursed HUD HOPWA Funds ($32,495 from Bank Pool
Clearing Account)
D-4: Treasury ERAP 1 Reallocated Funds ($3 million from ARPA in Miscellaneous Grant Fund)
D-5: Treasury ERAP 2 Reallocated Funds ($2,880,366 from ARPA in Miscellaneous Grant Fund)
D-6: Annex Building Renovation – Moving Funds from Misc. Grants to CIP Fund ($500,000 from
ARPA in Miscellaneous Grant Fund)
D-7: State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan ($7 million from Debt Service Fund)
E-1: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant ($86,750 from CIP Fund)
E-2: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant, Round 2 ($93,750 from CIP Fund)
E-3: Utah Department of Transportation, 600/700 N Frequent Transit Network Improvement Grant
($228,000 from CIP Fund)
Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 3
G-1: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Distracted Driving Prevention Program Grant
($13,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund)
G-2: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program Grant
($9,690 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund)
G-3: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 De-Escalation
Training Solicitation Grant ($92,230 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund)
G-4: U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 Law Enforcement
Mental Health and Wellness Grant ($59,360 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund)
G-5: US Department of Justice, 2021 Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Grant ($340,246 from
Miscellaneous Grant Fund)
G-6: Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG)
($10,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund)
Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 4
G-1: Utah State Office of Education, Child and Adult Care Food Program - Youth After School Programs
Grant ($46,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund)
G-2: Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Grant Program, Marathon Petroleum Foundation
Grant ($100,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund)
G-3: Mental Health First Responders, Utah Department of Human Services Grant ($80,010 from
Miscellaneous Grant Fund)
I-1: Additional Funding for Planning Division Mailings ($90,000 from General Fund Balance)
Items Referred to a Future Date (Not Adopted)
The Council identified four items to be held for more information and discussions. The items are:
A-3: Healthcare Innovation – Biohive ($50,000 from General Fund Balance)
A-8: Violent Crimes Unit COPS Hiring Grant City Match (Budget Neutral using $1,181,460 of Vacancy
Savings in Police Department)
E-4: State of Utah, Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail Grant ($1.3
million)
I-2: Rescope $1.3 Million of Parks Impact Fees as Match to State Grant for Five New Foothills
Trailheads (Budget Neutral)
MOTION 2 – ADOPT JULY FIREWORKS BUDGET
I further move that the Council approve item A-7 as part of Budget Amendment #6.
A-7: Restore July Fireworks Budget ($25,000 one-time from General Fund Balance)
-Note the Council requests that the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for FY2023 include funding
for alternative celebrations in calendar year 2023 that do not use fireworks
MOTION 3 – ADOPT ARTS COUNCIL STAFFING INCREASE
I further move that the Council approve item A-9 as part of Budget Amendment #6.
A-9: Arts Council Staff Increase of 3 FTEs ($175,000 from General Fund Balance)
MOTION 4 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action.
MOTION 5 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date.
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
MARY BETH THOMPSON
Chief Financial Officer
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
___________________________________ Date Received: ________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ___________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 14,2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT: Budget Amendment #6
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director (801) 535-6394 or
Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403
DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing,
the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2021-22 adopted budget.
BUDGET IMPACT:
REVENUE EXPENSE
GENERAL FUND $ 0.00 $ 2,701,648.00
FLEET FUND 1,482,576.00 1,482,576.00
IMS FUND 259,338.00 259,338.00
MISCELLANEOUS GRANT FUND 6,840,147.00 7,227652.00
HOUSING FUND 1,100,000.00 1,132,495.00
DEBT SERVICE FUND 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00
CIP FUND 3,658,298.75 3,658,298.75
TOTAL $ 20,340,359.75 $ 23,462,007.75
Lisa Shaffer (Jan 14, 2022 12:34 MST)
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Revenue for FY 2021-22 Budget Adjustments
The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2022.
Projections for fiscal year 2021 were better than expected, while projections for fiscal year 2022
continue to trend above budget. Sales tax for the first quarter was well above budget and the
prior year. Franchise tax is lagging below budget from a decrease in water franchise ($250,000)
and telephone ($150,000) franchise taxes.
Other notable increases are licenses are above budget driven by increases in airport parking taxes
and innkeepers tax. Permits remain very strong with increases in plan check fees and building
permits. Field reservations, land leases and building leases are leading to an increase in Charges,
Fees and Rentals.
Notable decreases include a decrease in moving violations and justice court fines and fire
reimbursement from the airport is also below budget.
FY21-22 Variance
Annual Revised Favorable
Revenue Budget Forecast (Unfavorable)
Property Taxes 112,726,044 112,726,044 -
Sales and Use Tax 89,556,472 93,436,473 3,880,001
Franchise Tax 12,102,129 11,700,054 (402,075)
PILOT Taxes 1,562,041 1,562,041 -
TOTAL TAXES 215,946,686 219,424,612 3,477,926
License and Permits 29,904,360 34,561,893 4,657,533
Intergovernmental 4,644,018 5,166,761 522,743
Interest Income 1,271,153 1,271,153 -
Fines & Forfeiture 3,474,455 3,425,328 (49,127)
Parking Meter Collection 2,693,555 2,693,555 -
Charges and Services 3,934,570 4,252,996 318,426
Miscellaneous Revenue 3,372,272 3,329,733 (42,539)
Interfund Reimbursement 22,032,892 21,523,465 (509,427)
Transfers 21,079,600 21,079,601 1
TOTAL W/OUT SPECIAL TAX 308,353,561 316,729,097 8,375,536
Sales and Use Tax - 1/2 cent 35,600,001 38,000,000 2,399,999
Sales and Use Tax - County Option - - -
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 343,953,562 354,729,097 10,775,535
With the completion of the CAFR fund balance would be projected as follows for FY2021 and FY2022:
With the use of fund balance from this budget amendment fund balance is projected to be at 21.29%.
FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL
Beginning Fund Balance 6,625,050 82,617,126 89,242,176 12,114,190 104,171,780 116,285,970
Budgeted Change in Fund Balance 2,924,682 (7,810,302) (4,885,620) (2,879,483) (15,335,334) (18,214,817)
Prior Year Encumbrances (3,733,743) (6,165,453) (9,899,196) (1,879,654) (10,259,789) (12,139,443)
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 5,815,989 68,641,371 74,457,360 7,355,053 78,576,657 85,931,710
Beginning Fund Balance Percent 14.51%23.16%22.13%18.22%24.71%23.98%
Year End CAFR Adjustments
Revenue Changes - - - - - -
Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) - (5,676,583) (5,676,583) - (7,535,897) (7,535,897)
Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 5,815,989 62,964,788 68,780,777 7,355,053 71,040,760 78,395,813
Final Fund Balance Percent 14.51%21.24%20.44%18.22%22.34%21.88%
Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance (1,000,000) (15,858,313) (16,858,313)
BA#1 Revenue Adjustment - - - -
BA#1 Expense Adjustment - - 5,138,235 5,138,235
BA#2 Revenue Adjustment - - 490,847 490,847
BA#2 Expense Adjustment - - (986,298) (986,298)
BA#3 Revenue Adjustment - - - -
BA#3 Expense Adjustment - (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (2,000,000)
BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - 1,508,044 1,508,044
BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - (4,242,779) (4,242,779)
BA#5 Revenue Adjustment - - 400,000 400,000
BA#5 Expense Adjustment - - (400,000) (400,000)
BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - - - -
BA#6 Expense Adjustment - - (1,997,761) (1,997,761)
BA#7 Revenue Adjustment - - - -
BA#7 Expense Adjustment - - - -
Change in Revenue 7,298,201 10,388,598 17,686,799 - - -
Fund Balance Budgeted Increase - - - - - -
- - Adjusted Fund Balance 12,114,190 57,495,073 69,609,263 6,355,053 69,951,048 76,306,101
Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 30.21%19.40%20.69%15.75%22.00%21.29%
Projected Revenue 40,095,707 296,422,894 336,518,601 40,359,137 317,980,599 358,339,736
2021 Projection 2022 Projection
The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $20,340,359.75 of revenue and
expense of $23,462,007.75. The amendment proposes changes in seven funds, including the
addition of 16 new FTEs. The amendment also includes the use of $2,701,648.00 from the
General Fund fund balance. The proposal includes 35 initiatives for Council review.
A summary spreadsheet document, outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The
Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council.
The budget opening is separated in eight different categories:
A. New Budget Items
B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources
C. Grants for New Staff Resources
D. Housekeeping Items
E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
F. Donations
G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards
I. Council Added Items
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2022
Sixth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including
the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2021-2022
In June of 2021, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City,
Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
2021 and ending June 30, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the
Utah Code.
The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with
the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments
to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically
stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and
inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document as provided above, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of
Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized
by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2021.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes
specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the
same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the
amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning
2
July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128
of the Utah Code.
SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is
authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in
the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2022.
________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________
Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed
_________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _________ of 2022.
Published: ___________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
Senior City Attorney
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 Suazo Membership GF - 25,000.00 - - Ongoing -
2 Move Grants Manager from ARPA to GF
Funding
GF - 66,000.00 - - Ongoing 1.00
2 Move Grants Manager from ARPA to GF
Funding
Misc Grants - (80,000.00) - - Ongoing (1.00)
3 Healthcare Innovation - Biohive GF - 50,000.00 - - One-time -
4 Fix the Bricks Grant - Transfer Grant
Funded PCN
GF - - - - Ongoing -
5 Additional Sergeant for Special Victims
Unit
GF - 81,671.00 - - Ongoing 1.00
5 Additional Sergeant for Special Victims
Unit
GF - 54,300.00 - - One-time -
5 Additional Sergeant for Special Victims
Unit
Fleet 49,500.00 49,500.00 - - One-time -
5 Additional Sergeant for Special Victims
Unit
IMS 4,800.00 4,800.00 - - One-time -
6 Police Access Control Upgrade and Support GF - 214,538.00 - - One-time -
6 Police Access Control Upgrade and Support IMS 214,538.00 214,538.00 - - One-time -
7 Fireworks Budget GF - 25,000.00 - - One-time -
8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City
Match
GF - 364,030.00 - - Ongoing 10.00
8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City
Match
GF - 282,430.00 - - Ongoing -
8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City
Match
GF - 535,000.00 - - One-time -
8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City
Match
Fleet 495,000.00 495,000.00 - - One-time -
8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City
Match
IMS 40,000.00 40,000.00 - - One-time -
9 Arts Council Staff GF - 175,000.00 - - Ongoing 3.00
10 Allen Part Plan CIP [Project Rescope]CIP - - One-time -
11 Executive Assistant in Mayors Office GF - 39,792.00 Ongoing 1.00
12 Citywide Equity Study GF - 90,000.00 One-time -
13 Fuel Cost Increases GF - 498,887.00 Ongoing -
13 Fuel Cost Increases Fleet 938,076.00 938,076.00 Ongoing -
14 COVID PPE GF - 200,000.00 One-time -
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed
Section A: New Items
1
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 ARPA HOME Admin and Planning Funds Misc Grants 176,660.00 176,660.00 - - One-time -
1 Interest Income on Bonding CIP 64,139.78 64,139.78 - - One-time -
1 Interest Income on Bonding CIP 80,976.97 80,976.97 - - One-time -
2 Housing Program Construction Costs Housing 1,100,000.00 1,100,000.00 - - One-time -
3 Reimburse Misc Grants for Unreimbursed
HUD HOPWA Funds
Misc Grants 32,495.00 - - - One-time -
3 Reimburse Misc Grants for Unreimbursed
HUD HOPWA Funds
Housing - 32,495.00 - - One-time -
4 Treasury ERAP 1 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 - - One-time -
5 Treasury ERAP 2 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants 2,880,366.00 2,880,366.00 - - One-time
6 Annex Building Renovation - Moving Funds
from Misc Grants to CIP
Misc Grants - 500,000.00 - - One-time -
6 Annex Building Renovation - Moving Funds
from Misc Grants to CIP
CIP 500,000.00 500,000.00 - - One-time -
7 State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan Debt Service 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 - - One-time -
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 UDOT Railroad Safety Grant CIP 86,750.00 86,750.00 - - One-time -
2 UDOT Railroad Safety Grant, Round 2 CIP 93,750.00 93,750.00 - - One-time -
3 Utah Dept. of Transportation, 600/700 N
FREQUENT TRANSIT NETWORK IMP
CIP 228,000.00 228,000.00 - - One-time -
3 Utah Dept. of Transportation, 600/700 N
FREQUENT TRANSIT NETWORK IMP
CIP (152,000.00) (152,000.00) - - One-time -
3 Utah Dept. of Transportation, 600/700 N
FREQUENT TRANSIT NETWORK IMP
CIP 152,000.00 152,000.00 - - One-time -
4 State of Utah, Governor's Office of
Economic Opportunity, Bonneville
Shoreline Trail
CIP 1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 - - One-time -
4 State of Utah, Governor's Office of
Economic Opportunity, Bonneville
Shoreline Trail
CIP 1,304,682.00 1,304,682.00 - - One-time -
-
Council Approved
Section D: Housekeeping
Section F: Donations
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Administration Proposed Council Approved
Administration Proposed
2
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
Consent Agenda #3
1 State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety
Office, Distracted Driving Prevention
Program
Misc Grants 13,000.00 13,000.00 - - One-time -
2 State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety
Office, Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety
Program
Misc Grants 9,690.00 9,690.00 - - One-time -
3 US Department of Justice, Community
Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 De-
Escalation Training Solicitation
Misc Grants 92,320.00 92,320.00 - - One-time -
4 US Department of Justice, Community
Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21
Law Enforcement Mental Health and
Wellness
Misc Grants 59,360.00 59,360.00 - - One-time -
5 US Department of Justice, 2021 Bureau of
Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
Misc Grants 340,246.00 340,246.00 - - One-time -
6 Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile
Justice (CCJJ) , State Asset Forfeiture
Grant (SAFG)
Misc Grants 10,000.00 10,000.00 - - One-time -
1 Utah State Office of Education, Child and
Adult Care Food Program - Youth After
School Programs
Misc Grants 46,000.00 46,000.00 - - One-time -
2 Marathon Petroleum Thriving
Communities Grant Program, Marathon
Petroleum Foundation
Misc Grants 100,000.00 100,000.00 - - One-time -
3 Mental Health First Responders, Utah
Department of Human
Services
Misc Grants 80,010.00 80,010.00 - - One-time -
Total of Budget Amendment Items 20,340,359.75 23,462,007.75 - - 15.00
Administration Proposed Council Approved
Section I: Council Added Items
Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards
Consent Agenda #4
3
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
Total by Fund Class, Budget Amendment #6:
General Fund GF - 2,701,648.00 - - 16.00
Fleet Fund Fleet 1,482,576.00 1,482,576.00 - - -
IMS Fund IMS 259,338.00 259,338.00 - - -
Miscellaneous Grants Fund Misc Grants 6,840,147.00 7,227,652.00 - - (1.00)
Housing Fund Housing 1,100,000.00 1,132,495.00 - - -
Debt Service Fund Debt Service 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 - - -
CIP Fund CIP 3,658,298.75 3,658,298.75 - - -
- - -
Total of Budget Amendment Items 20,340,359.75 23,462,007.75 - - 15.00
Administration Proposed Council Approved
4
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only
FY 2021-22 Budget, Including Budget Amendments
FY 2021-22
Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total
^^ Total Through
BA#5 ^^
General Fund (FC 10)367,582,070 (5,138,235.00) 986,298.00 2,000,000.00 4,242,779.00 400,000.00 370,072,912.00
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00
DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)2,033,573 2,033,573.00
Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,550,000 1,550,000.00
Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,699,663 7,098.00 5,706,761.00
Water Fund (FC 51)127,365,555 460,716.00 18,118.00 127,844,389.00
Sewer Fund (FC 52)268,213,796 221,826.00 7,941.00 268,443,563.00
Storm Water Fund (FC 53)19,201,013 19,705.00 2,278.00 19,222,996.00
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)706,792,500 1,350,949.00 39,790.00 708,183,239.00
Refuse Fund (FC 57)24,713,505 36,538.00 4,109.00 24,754,152.00
Golf Fund (FC 59)9,697,417 19,649.00 88,749.00 1,802,257.00 11,608,072.00
E-911 Fund (FC 60)4,056,856 4,056,856.00
Fleet Fund (FC 61)28,090,576 18,999.00 112,646.00 423,258.00 28,645,479.00
IMS Fund (FC 65)24,302,487 219,193.00 135,492.00 24,657,172.00
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for
Transportation (FC 69)
5,307,142 5,307,142.00
CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,341,332 5,341,332.00
Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)18,684,617 10,427,551.76 1,522,743.00 11,151,215.48 3,447,000.00 45,233,127.24
Other Special Revenue (FC 73)273,797 273,797.00
Donation Fund (FC 77)2,752,565 2,752,565.00
Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)16,121,000 16,121,000.00
Debt Service Fund (FC 81)31,850,423 26,165,000.00 58,015,423.00
CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)29,503,216 (150,753.00) 23,400,000.00 52,752,463.00
Governmental Immunity (FC 85)2,933,913 24,843.00 2,958,756.00
Risk Fund (FC 87)52,939,489 19,705.00 212,897.00 53,172,091.00
Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,755,009,505 7,688,537.76 2,559,683.00 2,000,000.00 67,605,134.48 3,847,000.00 1,838,709,860.24
5
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
^^ Total Through
BA#5 ^^ BA #6 Total
^^ Total Through
BA#6^^
General Fund (FC 10)370,072,912.00 2,701,648.00 372,774,560.00
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000.00 3,000.00
DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)2,033,573.00 2,033,573.00
Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,550,000.00 1,550,000.00
Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,706,761.00 5,706,761.00
Water Fund (FC 51)127,844,389.00 127,844,389.00
Sewer Fund (FC 52)268,443,563.00 268,443,563.00
Storm Water Fund (FC 53)19,222,996.00 19,222,996.00
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)708,183,239.00 708,183,239.00
Refuse Fund (FC 57)24,754,152.00 24,754,152.00
Golf Fund (FC 59)11,608,072.00 11,608,072.00
E-911 Fund (FC 60)4,056,856.00 4,056,856.00
Fleet Fund (FC 61)28,645,479.00 1,482,576.00 30,128,055.00
IMS Fund (FC 65)24,657,172.00 259,338.00 24,916,510.00
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for 5,307,142.00 5,307,142.00
CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,341,332.00 5,341,332.00
Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)45,233,127.24 7,227,652.00 52,460,779.24
Other Special Revenue (FC 73)273,797.00 273,797.00
Donation Fund (FC 77)2,752,565.00 2,752,565.00
Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)16,121,000.00 1,132,495.00 17,253,495.00
Debt Service Fund (FC 81)58,015,423.00 7,000,000.00 65,015,423.00
CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)52,752,463.00 3,658,298.75 56,410,761.75
Governmental Immunity (FC 85)2,958,756.00 2,958,756.00
Risk Fund (FC 87)53,172,091.00 53,172,091.00
-
Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,838,709,860.24 23,462,007.75 - - - - 1,862,171,867.99
BA#4 and BA#5 remain open with the City Council.
Budget Manager
Analyst, City Council
Contingent Appropriation
6
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
1
Section A: New Items
A-1: Suazo Membership GF $25,000.00
Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar
For Questions Please Include: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar, Randy Hillier
This funding would continue to allow Salt Lake City to be represented on the Suazo Board. According to the organization’s
website, “The Suazo Business Center is a business Resource committed to the development and empowerment of the
Latino/Hispanic and other underserved communities. We provide assistance to help existing and potential minority
entrepreneurs succeed and build wealth.” The Administration stated Economic Development would identify a staff person
to serve on the Board.
A-2: Move Grants Manager from ARPA to GF Funding GF $66,000.00
Misc Grants -$80,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson
For Questions Please Include: Mary Beth Thompson , John Vuyk
The position associated with this move will be managing all grants, including ARPA. Since ARPA funds need to be
specifically dedicated, this position doesn’t qualify for ARPA funding and will need to be moved to and funded by the
General Fund.
A-3: Healthcare Innovation - Biohive GF $50,000.00
Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar
For Questions Please Include: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar, Randy Hillier
Salt Lake City has focused a substantial amount of economic recovery efforts on the healthcare innovation industry as a
part of the Tech Lake City initiative. This industry has a strong presence in the City and has high growth potential. This
industry is particularly strategic for the City as these jobs are anchor ed with research and development and have high
potential for upward mobility. This funding will go towards a collaborative effort alongside industry partners to brand the
industry, highlight opportunities within it for underserved communities, and elevate apprenticeships, internships, and
upward career mobility.
A-4: Fix the Bricks Grant – Transfer Grant Funded
PCN GF $0.00
Department: Fire Prepared By: Clint Rasmussen
For Questions Please Include: Clint Rasmussen, Randy Hillier
Emergency Management recently integrated into the Fire Department. Its existing programs have improved, and new
projects are in the works. Emergency Management has several federal grants that it manages including "Fix the Bricks".
Part of this specific grant funds the salary/benefits of one FTE to help administer the program. It was determined that the
'Fix the Bricks' grant would be more appropriately administered in the Department of Community and Neighborhood's
Housing Stability.
This budget amendment would amend the staffing document to reflect the move of 1 PCN/FTE from Fire to Community
and Neighborhoods. As the FTE is funded through the grant, no transfer of budget needs to occur.
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
2
A-5: Additional Sergeant for Special Victims Unit GF $81,671.00
GF $54,300.00
Fleet $49,500.00
IMS $4,800.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith
For Questions Please Include: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith, Sandee Moore
Currently, the SVU Sergeant is supervising 12 detectives which is not manageable. SVU caseloads have continued to
increase and additional detectives have been assigned to the squad over the past few years in an effort to manage the
caseload. Also, over 700 Sexual Assault Kit Initiative (SAKI) kits were submitted a few years ago and the state lab has been
making good progress, now returning Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) hits at an increasingly rapid rate. Due to the
response of the State lab, we currently have over 400 CODIS hits from the SAKI kits producing cold case leads. These cases
need follow up and investigation in a timely manner which we cannot facilitate without additional resources.
The benefit of an additional Sergeant, outside rectifying the immense span of control currently handled by a single
Sergeant, is the ability to focus efforts on the SAKI and cold case queue. Separating the functions of the squad, overseen by
a second Sergeant, to investigate sex crimes committed against adults and children from cold cases, SAK cases, and lesser,
but still serious sex crimes (voyeurism, sexual battery, gross lewdness, etc.) would reduce individual caseloads and allow
for better case investigation of these crimes as well as increase our ability to make progress on the SAKI cases with CODIS
hits.
This request for an additional Sgt includes funding for fleet and IMS.
This request facilitates an immediate need and future budget requests may be considered for two additional SAKI cold case
detectives, overtime, or other resources to facilitate investigation of these cases in a timely manner.
A-6: Police Access Control Upgrade and Support GF $214,538.00
IMS $214,538.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich, Captain Teerlink
For Questions Please Include: Shellie Dietrich, Captain Teerlink, Sandee Moore, Aaron Bentley
Budget request for an update of the security access control system at PSB and ancillary PD facilities. The current system
needs to be replaced to prevent a critical failure of building security required for state compliance. PD has worked with
facilities to identify a state contracted vendor that will provide the hardware, software and support for access control. The
server that is specified in this system has capacity to add other city access control systems as the city system expands.
Ongoing cost for support is $45,000 per year and is included in the initial cost for the first yea r.
The Police Department has coordinated on this request with Facilities IMS and public works to ensure functionality for all
departments as the system is expanded throughout the city. This request is for the first phase of the implementation that
covers the police department system.
A-7: Fireworks Budget GF $25,000.00
Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Gregg Evans
For Questions Please Include: Gregg Evans, Kristin Riker, John Vuyk
The Public Lands Department Community Events group is requesting $25,000 from General Funds to cover the annual
July firework shows that would occur during calendar year 2022. Due to the severe drought, we experienced this past
summer the City Council cut the firework funding "one -time" from the FY22 budget. Due to the firework show contract
requirements the FY22 show was already prepaid in March of FY21 to reserve the fireworks show in July of FY22. Cutting
the funding in FY22 actually impacts the FY23 firework shows.
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
3
This budget amendment request would reinstate those funds and provide spending authority to purchase the firework
display in advance for the following fiscal year.
A-8: Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match GF $364,030.00
GF $282,430.00
GF $535,000.00
Fleet $495,000.00
IMS $40,000.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith
For Questions Please Include: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith, Sandee Moore
The COPS Hiring Grant was funded by DOJ in 2019 and accepted by the City and approved by City Council. A condition o f
the grant is that the 3-year project must be completed within a 5-year project period as extensions allow. This will require
hiring in January or February of 2022 to facilitate the 3-year project period within the 5 years allowed. The requested
budget would be the city portion of the hiring costs for FY 22. Funding would also be required in FY 23 and FY 24 . In FY
25, 6 months of funding would be the city portion and then the city would take on full budget for these 10 positions. The
total grant funding is $1,250,000 which will equate to approximately 25% of the cost over 3 years. The 10 officer positions
were identified to create a squad dedicated to addressing Violent Crime in the community. These positions, in conjunction
with the cooperative Project Safe Neighborhoods program, will have a major impact on the ability to proactively work to
reduce violent crime in the city by enforcement and prosecution.
A-9: Arts Council Staff GF $175,000.00
Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar
For Questions Please Include: Ben Kolendar, Lorena Riffo Jensen, Jolynn Walz, Randy Hillier
The Arts Council is in need of additional staffing support to accommodate duties shifted from the Mayor’s Advisor on Arts
& Culture role. In addition, challenges remain to keep up with current workload, fundraising needs due to ZAP loss of
qualifying expenditures, and new initiatives requested of the Arts Council. Attrition has been a challenge at the Arts
Council due to workload. The request is for 3.0 FTEs which is approximately $350,000 in ongoing expenses and
approximately $175,000 in FY22 if funded mid-year. The Arts Council currently has 6.5 FTE to run the full operations of a
non-profit, the City’s growing public art program (including maintenance), the city’s arts grants program, programming
such as Living Traditions and the Twilight Concert Series and serve as an ombudsman to the arts community.
A-10: Allen Park Plan CIP Project Rescope CIP $0.00
Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Gregg Evans
For Questions Please Include: Kristin Riker, Lewis Kogan, Katherine Maus, Gregg Evans
Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment to revise the scope of submitted CIP application for FY 2021 -2022. The
original scope for Historic Structure Renovation and Activation at Allen Park included funding for structural and
occupancy analysis of historic structures; drawings, plans and cost estimates for reconstruction of the George Allen Home,
the "Rooster House," septic system removal, sewer line construction, water infrastructure, stabilization of exterior art
pieces, and pedestrian stairway connections; and reconstruction of lighting and driveways. The current scope also lists
reconstruction of the George Allen Home and "Rooster House" to serve as a small cafe with dining opportunities. Due to
initial public engagement and feedback, Public Lands is requesting a scope change to engage in robust community and
stakeholder engagement to create an Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan for Allen Park which will determine the future
use of the structures. In order to preserve the strong community investment in the site, Public Lands believes it would be
necessary to engage in extensive public engagement to inform a plan that will guide future management decisions and
capital improvement projects in the Park. Public Lands is currently engaging with a consultant to complete a Cultural
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
4
Landscape Report, which will also influence the Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan and be completed in a timely manner,
in conjunction with public engagement for the plan.
Funding for an Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan for Allen Park was awarded in 2020 with reallocated emergency bond
funding. However, it was ultimately discovered that it was not legally permit ted for bond funding to be utilized for a non-
capital expense. Public Lands is currently utilizing the emergency bond funding for emergency repairs to minimize damage
to the structures and the property, including but not limited to roof repair, restoring e xternal power to select structures,
investigation and construction documentation for sewer and water line installation, failing appliance removal, septic
infrastructure removal, etc.
Project tasks within the new scope may include but are not limited to:
- Robust community engagement with key stakeholders, the Sugarhouse community, and the broader public
- Development of an Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan, informed by the Cultural Landscape Report and public
engagement, to guide future management of the site including over-arching goals, specific projects, objectives and
prioritization
- Structural and occupancy analysis of the historic structures
- Development of conceptual and construction documents, and cost estimates for adaptive reuse and activation
projects listed in the Plan
- Investigation into the feasibility of Allen Park becoming a Historic Landmark Site
A-11: Executive Assistant in the Mayor’s Office GF $39,792.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Dawn Valente, John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
The budget proposes to increase staffing in the Mayor’s Office by one additional executive assistant. The budget is for five
month’s salary and costs for computers and other supplies.
A-12: Citywide Equity Study GF $90,000.00
Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Kaletta Lynch, Mary Beth Thompson, John
Vuyk
The City has been working with Keen Independent Research to review equity practices in the City. The Administration is
seeking funding to continue to work with Keen in developing plans to bring equity to Salt Lake City. Funding will allow the
City to work with the vendor through this fiscal year to complete the plans.
A-13: Fuel Cost Increases GF $498,887.00
Fleet $938,076.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dawn Valente, John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Lorna Vogt, Dawn Valente, Nancy Bean, Denise Sorensen, Mary Beth
Thompson, John Vuyk
The City has seen an increase in fuel cost. The budget will provide Fleet funding to purchase the required fuel for the
remainder of the fiscal year. The budget also proposes to transfer funding from personnel within the Police [$300,000]
and CAN [$12,622] Department to cover fuel increases. The budget also proposes additional funding from Non-
Departmental to cover the costs not covered by general fund department budgets.
The fuel increase has also impacted the Public Utilities, Sustainability, and Golf funds.
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
5
A-14: COVID PPE GF $200,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk
For Questions Please Include: Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk, Lorna Vogt
The City’s supply of masks and other PPE to combat COVID is depleting. This request is for an additional $200,000 to
purchase additional supplies to keep citizens, visitors and employees safe in City owned buildings.
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
B-1: ARPA HOME Admin and Planning Funds Misc Grants $176,660.00
Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner
For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Melyn Osmond
HUD has authorized the City to access 5% ($176,659.75) of admin and planning funds of the City's 2021 HUD HOME -
ARPA award (total award, $3,533.195). HOME-ARPA funds are designated for housing opportunities for individuals
experiencing homelessness. These admin and planning funds will facilitate admin for existing City staff and expenses
related to the HUD-required HOME-ARPA Community Assessment. The Community Assessment will identify needs and
opportunities to help direct the HOME-ARPA funds. Please see attached funding agreement.
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section D: Housekeeping
D-1: Interest Income on Bonding CIP $64,139.78
CIP $80,976.97
Department: Finance Prepared By: Jared Jenkins
For Questions Please Include: Jared Jenkins, Brandon Bagley, Marina Scott, Mary Beth Thompson
The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019A, were issued in October 2019 for the purpose of funding the reconstruction of
City streets. The total par amount of the bonds issued were $17,540,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds
were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, the unspent bond proceeds have been earning interest. This amendment will
adjust the budget to reflect the actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from October 2020 through
August 2021.
The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020, were issued in September 2020 for the purpose of funding the reconstruction
of City streets. The total par amount of the bonds issued were $17,745,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds
were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, the unspent bond proceeds have been earning interest. This amendment will
adjust the budget to reflect the actual proceeds available including accumulat ed interest from February 2021 through
August 2021.
D-2: Housing Program Construction Costs Housing $1,100,000.00
Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner
For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Suzanne Swanson
Recognize $1,100,000 in unbudgeted revenue for the purpose of offsetting increases in constructions costs for three
affordable single-family homes currently in development. This revenue was not included in the initial budget due to the
timing of other home sales in the Housing Program that generated the revenue.
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
6
D-3: Reimburse Misc Grants for Unreimbursed HUD
HOPWA Funds Misc Grants $0.00
Housing $32,495.00
Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner
For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Suzanne Swanson
Finance discovered that $32,494.55 was paid out to a subgrantee in 2017, but never reimbursed from HUD for HOPWA
Cost Center 7261611. The HUD reimbursement deadline of three years has passed for these funds. Housing Stability has
identified unrestricted funds from 7800404 Bank Pool Clearing to make the City whole. This budget amendment will
facilitate the transfer of funds from a 78 Fund Class to a 72 Fund Class.
D-4: Treasury ERAP 1 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants $3,000,000.00
Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner
For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Suzanne Swanson
The Treasury has reallocated unspent Emergency Rent Assistance Program (ERAP) 1 funds set -aside for the State of Utah
by low-performing cities and made these funds available to apply for by high-performing cities, such as Salt Lake City.
These reallocated funds are for direct client assistance only.
To administer Salt Lake City’s initial ERAP 1 award, the City contracted with the State of Utah, Department of Workforce
Services’ (DWS) online Utah Rent Relief application portal, https://rentrelief.utah.gov/.
Coordinating with DWS, Housing Stability staff have determined that Salt Lake City could apply for $3,000,000 in
reallocated ERAP 1. These funds will further assist Salt Lake City residents with deposit, rent, utilities, rent arrears, and
utility arrears, again utilizing the Utah Rent Relief application portal.
Note: This new request is separate from, and does not affect, the City’s other Treasury ERAP 1 ($6,067,033) and ERAP 2
($4,800,559.40) awards.
See attached funding agreement.
(Note: 7262150-Treasury ERA Direct Financial Assistance, is the current Cost Center for ERAP 1 Direct Client Assistance)
D-5: Treasury ERAP 2 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants $2,880,366.00
Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner
For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Suzanne Swanson
This budget amendment is to recognize the City's second allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act, Treasury Emergency
Rent Assistance (ERAP) 2 funds, in the amount of $2,880,335.64, for the purpose of addressing housing stability for Salt
Lake City residents. See attached funding agreement. The City approved the first allocatio n of the ERAP 2 funds in BA1 of
FY 21-22, in the amount of $1,920,233.76. The City's total ERAP 2 award is $4,800,599.40.
BA1 included the following budget items for those funds: Direct Client Assistance $1,632,199, and Community Partner
Admin $288,034.76.
To administer Salt Lake City’s first and second allocations of ERAP 2, the City will contract with the State of Utah,
Department of Workforce Services’ (DWS) online Utah Rent Relief application portal, https://rentrelief.utah.gov/. The
City has previously and successfully contracted with DWS for the City’s ERAP 1 funds.
This budget amendment aligns with Treasury guidance on eligible activities and allowable percentage amounts for ERPA 2.
In addition to further supporting Direct Client Assistance (deposits, rent, utilities, rent arrears, and utility arrears), an d the
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
7
associated Community Partner Admin to facilitate the prop er distribution of these funds, Housing Stability is requesting
City Admin to support one (1) FTE, and funds to support Housing Stability services.
Re: the one (1) FTE: Currently, the City’s ERAP 1 and 2 funds are being administered by 1 PTE. This positio n is necessary
to facilitate the City administration, coordination, and compliance monitoring. This position was pervious approved by
Council with ERAP 1 funding. Since then, the administration of these funds has demonstrated that a FTE is required. This
one (1) requested position would be Grade 26, Community Development Grant Specialist, fully loaded for 39 months.
(April 2022 - Jun 2025, at $34.50 an hour [$215,280], plus benefits [$53,820].Total $269,100.) This position would be
fully funded by ERAP funding and would sunset when funding expires.
Re: Housing Stability services: According to the Treasury, eligible “Housing Stability” services include: Case management,
Eviction prevention, Eviction diversion programs, Mediation between landlords and tenants , Housing counseling, Fair
housing counseling, Housing navigators or promotors that help households access ERA programs or find housing,
Housing-related services for survivors of domestic abuse or human trafficking, Legal services or attorney’s fees related to
eviction proceedings and maintaining housing stability, Specialized services for individuals with disabilities or seniors tha t
support their ability to access or maintain housing. A public competitive process would receive applications from providers
for eligible Housing Stability services.
D-6: Annex Building Renovation – Moving Funds
from Misc Grants to CIP Misc Grants $500,000.00
CIP $500,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Randy Hillier
For Questions Please Include: Teresa Beckstrand, John Vuyk, Randy Hillier
In Budget Amendment #2, the Council added an item totaling $500,000 in grant funding to be used for Annex Building
Renovations. This amount was approved within the Miscellaneous Grants Fund. Since the associated annex building
renovation should be done through CIP, the budget needs to be moved.
D-7: State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan Debt Service $7,000,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Brandon Bagley
For Questions Please Include: Marina Scott, Brandon Bagley, Jared Jenkins, Mary Beth Thompson
On December 6, 2021, the City and the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) entered into a loan agreement which
will be used to finance a portion of a neighborhood parking structure between 400 West and 500 West and 600 South and
700 South. The loan is expected to be repaid with funds allocated to the City by H.B. 244 (2021). The City has received
funds for the State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the receipt of loan
proceeds and the expenditure budget to disburse the proceeds for the project.
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
E-1: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant CIP $86,750.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond
For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Mary Beth Thompson, Jon Larsen, Orion Goff
The Dept. of Community & Neighborhood, Division of Engineering applied for and received $86,750 for the Utah Railroad
Safety Grant 2021 (round 1) for safety improvements to the railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South.
Planned safety improvements include widening the roadway, improving sight distance by raising the street grade
approach, adding sidewalk on the south side of the crossing, adding bike lanes, and replacing the railroad crossing signals .
The funding plan is to request an additional $260,250 in the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 Round 2 competition to
complete the funding package for the project.
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
8
This grant has no match requirement. A public hearing was held 4/6/21 for the original grant application for this award.
E-2: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant, Round 2 CIP $93,750.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond
For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Mary Beth Thompson, Jon Larsen, Orion Goff
The Dept. of Community & Neighborhood, Division of Engineering applied for and received $93,750 for the Utah Railroad
Safety Grant 2021 (round 2) for safety improvements to the railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South.
Planned safety improvements include widening the roadway, improving sight distance by raising the street grade
approach, adding sidewalk on the south side of the crossing, adding bike lanes, and replacing the railroad crossing signals.
This grant has no match requirement. A public hearing was held 12/7/21 for the original grant application for this award.
E-3: Utah Department of Transportation, 600/700 N
Frequent Transit Network Improvement CIP $228,000.00
CIP -$152,000.00
CIP $152,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond
For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Mary Beth Thompson, Jon Larsen, Orion Goff
Salt Lake City Division of Transportation nominated 600/700 North Frequent Transit Network Improvements (Near
Term) for $228,000 from the TTIF: Transit Projects funding.
The project installs approximately 20 new Level III transit shelters along 600/700 North from 2200 West to 300 West.
This grant has a match requirement of $152,000 coming from the Funding Our Futures sales tax transit funding. A public
hearing was held 4/7/20 for the original grant application for this award.
E-4: State of Utah, Governor’s Office of Economic
Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail CIP $1,300,000.00
Impact Fee $1,304,682.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond
For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Mary Beth Thompson, Kristin Riker
The Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands received $1,300,000 for the Foothills Natural Area & Bonneville Shoreline
Trailhead Infrastructure Improvements.
The project proposes to construct five public access trailheads along the stretch of the Bonneville Shoreline Trail that runs
through the Salt Lake City foothills between Emigration Canyon and Davis County.
Proposed trailhead locations are: 1) Bonneville Boulevard near City Creek Canyon and U tah State Capitol, 2) Emigration
Canyon near This Is The Place Heritage Park, 3) Popperton Park near the University of Utah, 4) 18th Avenue in the upper
Avenues neighborhood, and 5) Victory Road northwest of the Utah State Capitol.
This grant has a match requirement of $1,300,000. Parks & Public Lands has committed matching funds is from parks
impact fees adopted in FY 2022 Capital Improvement Program for the Foothills Trailhead Development Phase II.
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
9
A public hearing was held on 12/7/21 on the grant appl ication for this award.
Section F: Donations
Section G: Consent Agenda
Consent Agenda #3
G-1: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Distracted Driving
Prevention Program
Misc.
Grants $13,000.00
Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond
The Police Department applied for and received a $13,000 grant from the Utah Highway Safety Office for the 2022
Distracted Driving Prevention Program.
The grant funding for overtime to conduct distracted driving enforcement/education shifts.
A Public Hearing was held on 4/20/21 for the grant application on this award.
G-2: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Bicycle and
Pedestrian Safety Program
Misc.
Grants $9,690.00
Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith/ Melyn Osmond
The Police Department applied for and received a $9,690 grant from the Utah Highway Safety Office for the 2022 Salt
Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program.
This award is to fund Crosswalk enforcement/education overtime and Youth bicycle rodeo overtime.
A Public Hearing was held on 4/20/21 for the grant application on this award.
G-3: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services
(COPS), FY21 De-Escalation Training Solicitation
Misc.
Grants $92,320.00
Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond
The Police Department applied for and received a $92,320 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, Community
Oriented Policing Services through the FY21 Community Policing Development De-Escalation Training Program.
The grant will fund the Apex Officer Interactive Crisis Intervention, De-Escalation and Force Options Virtual Reality
Training Simulator. It will also provide funding for up to 20 officers to attend an ICAT (Integrating Communications,
Assessment, and Tactics) de-escalation train-the-trainer course as well as training staff overtime/supplies to implement
the ICAT and virtual reality curriculums.
The Apex Officer Virtual Reality Training System is a comprehensive solution that is designed to allow trainers the ability
to give presentations and classes, conduct interactive testing and assessment, and provide immersive, hands -on scenario-
based exercises with detailed debriefing and after-action review.
ICAT is a training program that provides first responding police officers with the tools, skills, and options they need to
successfully and safely defuse a range of critical incidents. The only costs b eing funded are for per diem, remaining travel
costs will be covered by other funding sources.
A Public Hearing was held on 10/5/21 for the grant application on this award.
G-4: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services
(COPS), FY21 Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness
Misc.
Grants $59,360.00
Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith/ Melyn Osmond
The Police Department applied for and received a $59,360 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, Community
Oriented Policing Services through the FY21 Community Policing Development Law Enforcement Mental Health and
Wellness Act.
The grant will fund: Training for Employee Wellness and Peer Support Teams, Wellness Initiative and Chaplain Program
Uniforms, Program Education and Marketing Materials, Class Supplies, Program Evaluation, Instructor Fees for Family
Wellness Workshops, and Overtime.
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
10
A Public Hearing was held on 9/7/21 for the grant application on this award.
G-5: US Department of Justice, 2021 Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant
(JAG)
Misc.
Grants $340,246.00
Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond
The Police Department applied for and received a grant award from the U.S. Department of Justice under the 2021 Edward
Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) program. The total grant award is $340,246. Of that total the City will
subaward $57,054.50 to the Unified Police Department and $57,054.50 to Salt Lake County (Sheriff's Office). The
subaward amounts are determined by a federal funding allocation formula.
The Police Department will use its award to provide training for sworn and civilian personnel, to support directed
community policing overtime, and to purchase the following: a tactical robot, less lethal shotguns and ammo, tactical
operation center throw phone capability enhancements, a laptop for Crime Lab FARO software, vest carriers and plates for
Crime Lab personnel, LEAPS (Law Enforcement Automated Personnel Software), and camera systems for the Internal
Affairs Unit and the HOP physical training facility.
No Match is required.
A Public Hearing was held on 10/5/21 for the grant application on this award.
G-6: Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), State
Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG)
Misc.
Grants $10,000.00
Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond
The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for additional grant funding and was awarded $10,000 from the State of
Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), under the State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) program. The
State is combining these new funds with the previously funded amount of $1,500.
The funds will be used for an overt pole camera kit, Narcan nasal spray, and drug prevention/resource cards
A public hearing was held 9/7/21 for this grant application.
Consent Agenda #4
G-1: Utah State Office of Education, Child and Adult Care Food
Program - Youth After School Programs
Misc
Grants $46,000.00
Department: CAN (Youth & Family) Prepared By: Kim Thomas / Melyn Osmond
The Youth & Family Division of Public Services applied for and received a continuation grant offered annually by the Utah
State Office of Education, under the Child and Adult Care Food Program. These funds are available to youth service
providers as part of the At-Risk Snack Program to reimburse for the costs of snacks served to children participating in the
after-school programs. Central City Rec. Center, Fairmont Park, Glendale Library, Liberty Park, Northwest Rec. Center,
Ottinger Hall, the Youth and Family Division Office, and Sorenson Campus will receive reimbursement directly through
the State Office of Education and will receive up to $46,000, based on qualified snack expenses. SLC is reimbursed on a
monthly basis and only qualified healthy snacks and meals served to children participating in the after-school
enrichment/education activities during the afterschool program hours are eligible for reimbursement. A public hearing will
be held for the grant application.
G-2: Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Grant Program,
Marathon Petroleum Foundation
Misc
Grants $100,000.00
Department: CAN (Youth & Family) Prepared By: Ken Perko / Melyn Osmond
The Division of Youth & Family Services applied for and received $100,000 in grant funding for the Marathon Petroleum
Thriving Communities Program. The funding will be used to purchase two 14 -passenger vans that will be used by program
staff to transport youth participants from a variety of neighborhood elementary schools to the YouthCity Northwest
Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
11
Recreation center site for afterschool programming. No match is required. A public hearing will be held for this grant
application.
G-3: Mental Health First Responders, Utah Department of Human
Services
Misc
Grants $80,010.00
Department: Human Resources Prepared By: Trent Steele / Melyn Osmond
The Human Resource Dept. applied for and received $80,010 in grant funding for the Mental Health First Responders
grant program from Utah Dept. of Human Services. The funding will be used to increase the capacity of the City's existing
EAP (Employee Assistance Program), targeting first responders. The two clinicians currently under contract with
ComPsych will increase their hours of availability to provide onsite, in person, telephone, and virtual counselling
particularly emergency services for individuals who may be in crisis. The total hours will increase by 815 over the course of
the pilot projecting. No match is required. A public hearing will be held for this grant application.
Section I: Council Added Items
Impact Fees ‐ Summary Confidential
Data pulled 12/13/2021
Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area
Area Cost Center UnAllocated
Cash Notes:
Impact fee - Police 8484001 471,211$ A
Impact fee - Fire 8484002 1,644,113$ B
Impact fee - Parks 8484003 11,709,246$ C
Impact fee - Streets 8484005 6,585,173$ D
20,409,744$
Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month
202107 (Jul2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202108 (Aug2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202109 (Sep2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202110 (Oct2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Current Month
202111 (Nov2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202112 (Dec2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202201 (Jan2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202202 (Feb2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202203 (Mar2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202204 (Apr2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202205 (May2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202206 (Jun2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202207 (Jul2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202208 (Aug2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202209 (Sep2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202210 (Oct2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202211 (Nov2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202212 (Dec2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202301 (Jan2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202302 (Feb2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202303 (Mar2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202304 (Apr2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202305 (May2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202306 (Jun2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202307 (Jul2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202308 (Aug2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202309 (Sep2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202310 (Oct2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202311 (Nov2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202312 (Dec2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202401 (Jan2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202402 (Feb2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202403 (Mar2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202404 (Apr2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202405 (May2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202406 (Jun2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Total, Currently Expiring through June 2021 0$ -$ -$ -$ 0$
Fiscal
Quarter
E = A + B + C + D
Police Fire Parks Streets
Total
FY 2023Calendar
Month
FY 2022FY 2024
Impact Fees Confidential
Data pulled 12/13/2021 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC
Police Allocation Budget
Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances
YTD
Expenditures
Allocation Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Police Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Police Allocation
Encumbrances Sum of Police Allocation YTD
Sum of Police Allocation Remaining
Appropriation
ReimbExcessPoliceCapacity IF 8422800 1,898,497$ -$ 1,898,497$ -$
Police'sConsultant'sContract 8419205 3,565$ -$ 3,565$ -$
Sugarhouse Police Precinct 8417016 10,331$ 10,331$ -$ -$
PolicePrecinctLandAquisition 8419011 239,836$ 239,836$ -$ -$
Eastside Precint 8419201 21,639$ 21,639$ -$ -$ A
Public Safety Building Replcmn 8405005 14,068$ 14,068$ -$ 0$
Police Refunds 8418013 -$ -$ (3,588)$ 3,588.33$
Police Impact Fee Refunds 8421102 338,448$ -$ 68,100$ 270,348$
Grand Total 2,526,385$ 285,875$ 1,966,574$ 273,937$
Fire Allocation Budget
Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Fire Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Fire Allocation
Encumbrances Sum of Fire Allocation YTD E
Sum of Fire Allocation Remaining
Appropriation
Fire refunds 8416007 82,831$ -$ -$ 82,830.52$
Fire Station #14 8415001 6,083$ 6,083$ -$ -$
Fire Station #14 8416006 44,612$ -$ -$ 44,612$
Fire Station #3 8415002 1,568$ -$ -$ 1,568.09$
Fire Station #3 8416009 565$ 96$ -$ 469$
Study for Fire House #3 8413001 15,700$ -$ -$ 15,700$
Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 4,941$ 3,021$ 1,862$ 58$
FY20 FireTrainingFac. 8420431 56,031$ -$ -$ 56,031$ B
Grand Total 212,331$ 9,200$ 1,862$ 201,268$
Parks Allocation Budget
Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Parks Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Parks Allocation
Encumbrances Sum of Parks Allocation YTD
Sum of Parks Allocation Remaining
Appropriation
Cnty #2 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420426 88$ -$ 88$ -$
Parks and Public Lands Compreh 8417008 7,500$ -$ 7,500$ -$
Fairmont Park Lighting Impr 8418004 49,752$ 12,155$ 37,597$ -$
Fisher Carriage House 8420130 1,098,764$ 1,038,968$ 59,796$ -$
FY Warm Springs Off Leash 8420132 20,411$ -$ 20,411$ -$
Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 4,857$ 2,596$ 2,219$ 42$
Folsom Trail/City Creek Daylig 8417010 146$ -$ -$ 146$
Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 23,530$ 23,000$ -$ 530$
Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,110$ -$ -$ 1,110$
Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$
Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 224,247$ 188,467$ 34,134$ 1,646$ C
9line park 8416005 21,958$ 19,702$ -$ 2,256$
Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$
JR Boat Ram 8420144 15,561$ -$ 7,763$ 7,798$
Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 12,795$ 4,328$ -$ 8,467$
Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$
ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 10,830$ -$ -$ 10,830$
Park refunds 8416008 11,796$ -$ -$ 11,796.28$
IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 58,014$ -$ 1,905$ 56,109$
Parks Impact Fee Refunds 8418015 101,381$ -$ -$ 101,381.06
UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 135,084$ 21,169$ 1,355$ 112,560$
FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 722,920$ 571,809$ 3,343$ 147,769$
Three Creeks West Bank NewPark 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$
9Line Orchard 8420136 195,045$ 32,650$ -$ 162,395$
RAC Playground with ShadeSails 8422415 180,032$ -$ -$ 180,032$
Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 523,889$ 284,846$ 11,297$ 227,746$
Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 388,477$ 59,106$ 64,495$ 264,877$
Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 275,000$ -$ -$ 275,000$
Bridge to Backman 8418005 290,276$ 10,285$ 4,515$ 275,475$
Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$
Historic Renovation AllenParK 8422410 420,000$ -$ -$ 420,000$
SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 425,000$ -$ -$ 425,000$
Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 489,688$ 64,333$ -$ 425,355$
Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 431,000$ -$ -$ 431,000$
Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 510,000$ -$ -$ 510,000$
Green loop 200 E Design 8422408 610,000$ -$ -$ 610,000$
Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,094,430$ 8,302$ 25,921$ 1,060,208$
SLCFoothillsTrailheadDevelpmnt 8422412 1,304,682$ -$ -$ 1,304,682$
Pioneer Park 8419150 3,343,904$ 107,850$ 121,172$ 3,114,882$
GlendaleWtrprk MstrPln&Rehab 8422406 3,200,000$ 21,800$ -$ 3,178,200$
Grand Total 16,694,447$ 2,471,367$ 403,507$ 13,819,573$
Streets Allocation Budget
Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Street Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Street Allocation
Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YTD
Sum of Street Allocation Remaining
Appropriation
700 South Reconstruction 8415004 2,449$ -$ 2,449$ -$
9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 152,500$ 139,280$ 13,220$ -$
Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ 13,000$ -$ -$
500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 32,718$ 16,691$ 16,027$ -$
Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 95,653$ 20,953$ 73,999$ 700$ D
Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 1,444$ -$ -$ 1,444$
Gladiola Street 8406001 16,109$ 13,865$ -$ 2,244$
Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$
Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$
Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 25,398$ -$ -$ 25,398$
900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 28,000$ -$ -$ 28,000$
1700S Corridor Transfrmtn IF 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$
Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 35,392$ -$ -$ 35,392$
200S TransitCmpltStrtSuppl IF 8422602 37,422$ -$ -$ 37,422$
Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 58,780$ 20,697$ -$ 38,083$
1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$
Transportatn Safety Imprvmt IF 8422620 44,400$ -$ -$ 44,400$
Local Link Construction IF 8422606 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$
900 S Signal Improvements IF 8422615 70,000$ -$ -$ 70,000$
400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 90,000$ -$ -$ 90,000$
Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$
Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$
Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 200,000$ -$ 12,484$ 187,516$
TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 302,053$ -$ -$ 302,053$
IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$
Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 2,250,220$ 290,460$ 1,216,451$ 743,309$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8419008 221,688$ 213,483$ 8,205$ -$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8420105 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 875,000$ 87,063$ -$ 787,937$
Grand Total 5,967,404$ 1,155,677$ 1,416,728$ 3,394,999$
Total 25,400,567$ 3,922,119$ 3,788,672$ 17,689,776$
E = A + B + C + D
TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE
UnAllocated
Budget
Amount
8484001
471,211$
$1,644,113
20,409,744$
8484002
8484003
8484005
11,709,246$
6,585,173$
Item C1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:March 1, 2022
RE: Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendments for Former Fire Station #3 Properties at
Approximately 1085, 1095, and 1097 East Simpson Avenue, and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive
PLNPCM2021-00914 & PLNPCM2021-01007
MOTION 1 (adopt)
I move that the Council adopt the ordinance
MOTION 2 (reject)
I move that the Council reject the ordinance.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:March 1, 2022
RE: Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendments for Former Fire Station #3 Properties at
Approximately 1085, 1095, and 1097 East Simpson Avenue, and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive
PLNPCM2021-00914 & PLNPCM2021-01007
PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE
No one spoke at the February 15, 2022 public hearing. The Council closed the hearing and deferred action
to a future Council meeting.
The following information was provided for the February 15, 2022 public hearing. It is
provided again for background purposes.
BRIEFING UPDATE
At the February 1 briefing the Council expressed general support for the proposed master plan and zoning
map amendments. A Council Member asked if the subject parcels are in the Sugar House Special
Assessment Area (SAA). Administrative staff stated they believe so and later confirmed they are. Another
question focused on SAA payments and if the City would pay those. Council staff stated if the property was
leased to a for-profit entity or for commercial use, then the City would make payments to the SAA. Those
fees are often passed on to the lessee through a development agreement, or payments are made in lieu of
the assessment. Details of how payments are made would need to be worked out.
A request was made for early community involvement before a request for proposal is issued. A council
Member noted community engaged development being done for the Fleet Block. It was suggested a similar
process be explored for the subject parcels.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: February 1, 2022
Set Date: February 1, 2022
Public Hearing: February 15, 2022
Potential Action: March 1, 2022
Page | 2
The following information was provided for the February 1, 2022 Council briefing. It
is provided again for background purposes.
The Council will be briefed about an ordinance that would amend zoning of Redevelopment Agency (RDA)
properties at approximately 1085, 1095, and 1097 East Simpson Avenue from the current PL (Public
Lands) zoning designation to CHSBD1 (Sugar House Central Business District 1) as shown in the image
below. The proposal would also amend the Sugar House Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map
for the properties from “Public Lands and Institutional” to “Business District Mixed Use Town Center
Scale.”
It is anticipated the subject properties will be consolidated with adjacent property to the east for future
development, but no development proposal is being considered at this point. Planning staff noted a future
project would likely be a mixed-use development including housing and commercial uses. If approved by
the Council, the subject properties’ zoning designation would match that of property to the east, which is
also owned by the RDA. Properties to the north and south are privately owned and are also zoned CSHBD1.
Fairmont Park and Aquatic Center are to the west and zoned OS (Open Space).
Two buildings are on the subject properties. The first is the former fire station #3 which served the Sugar
House neighborhood. A new station was built at 2425 South 900 East which serves the Sugar House
community, and the former station is no longer being used. The second is a Sugar House Business District
maintenance building used by crews that maintain the area’s public spaces. If the properties are used for
future development a new location would need to be found for the maintenance building.
Planning staff recommended and the Planning Commission forwarded a unanimous positive
recommendation to the City Council on the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments.
Area zoning map with subject properties shaded blue inside circle
Image courtesy Salt Lake City Planning Division
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments, determine if the
Council supports moving forward with the proposal.
Page | 3
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an update on plans to solicit development on
this property, including whether a long-term lease is the preferred approach. The Council may also
wish to further consider/discuss community input about future uses.
2. The Council may wish to ask the Administration if a space has been identified for maintenance
needs in the business district, and if any funding is needed to secure that location?
3. The Council may wish to ask the Administration if the potential future extension of the S-Line
streetcar to the east would impact redevelopment of this property or if it should be coordinated?
4. Is the Council supportive of the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments?
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
CSHBD1 Zoning Summary (21A.26.060 Salt Lake City Code)
Purpose Statement
The purpose of the CSHBD Sugar House Business District is to promote a walkable community
with a transit oriented, mixed use town center that can support a twenty-four (24) hour
population. The CSHBD provides for residential, commercial and office use opportunities, with
incentives for high density residential land use in a manner compatible with the existing form and
function of the Sugar House master plan and the Sugar House Business District.
The tables below include standards for the CSHBD1 zoning designation.
CSHBD1 Lot and Yard Standards
Lot
Width
Lot Area Front/Corner
Side Yard
Interior Side
Yard
Rear
Yard
Building
Coverage
Buffer yard
(Not applicable
in this instance)
None
required
None
required
None required
Max setback of 15
feet
None
required
None
required
No
maximum
Next to any residential zone:
7-foot landscaped yard.
Next to single family: one
additional foot setback for
every 3 feet in height over 30
feet.
SCHBD1 Building Height Standards
Lot Width Minimum
Height
Maximum Height Design Review
Residential
Uses
No minimum 105 feet When over 50 feet in height or if building
is over 20,000 square feet in size.
Non-
residential
Uses
No minimum 30 feet;
75 feet if equal amount of non-residential
and residential square footage;
105 feet if 90% of parking is structured
and residential uses are provided off-site.
When over 50 feet in height or if building
is over 20,000 square feet in size.
CSHBD1 Ground Floor Use Requirements
Must be residential, retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses,
restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities.
Page | 4
MASTER PLAN CONSIDERATIONS
The subject parcels are within the area covered by the Sugar House Community Plan, adopted in 2005.
The Plan’s future land use map designates the subject parcels as “Institutional and Public Lands,” which
aligned with the previous use. As noted above, a new fire station was constructed at 2425 South 900 East.
The Plan also recommends expanding the Sugar House Business District to include the subject parcels. It is
Planning staff’s opinion the Plan supports changing the future land use map and zoning map to align with
the recommended Business District expansion.
ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
Attachment C (pages 10-11) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment
standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. Planning staff found the
proposed amendment does not conflict with applicable standards.
PUBLIC PROCESS
• September 27, 2021-Notice of the project and request for comments sent to the Sugar House
Community Council.
• September 28, 2021-Notice mailed to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the
subject properties. Digital open house notice posted to the Planning Division website and emailed
to Planning’s list serve.
• October 11, 2021-Sugar House Community Council Land Use Committee presentation and
discussion on the proposal.
• November 1, 2021-Sugar House Community Council sent a letter expressing support for the
proposed master plan and zoning map amendments.
• November 24, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing notice sent to Planning Division list
serve, posted on City and Utah Public Meeting websites. Public hearing notice posted on property.
• December 8, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing. One person spoke at the hearing
expressing support for the proposal. The Commission closed the hearing and voted unanimously
to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council.
• The Sugar House Community Council forwarded a few comments received on the proposal. Most
are generally supportive, with suggestions on what the land could be used for. These include a
community-oriented project rather than luxury apartments; a senior center; or extension of the
Fairmont Aquatic Center adding a recreation center. One commenter suggested retaining the
property as open space, a public plaza or other public amenity. The Sugar House Community
Council letter to Planning and public comments are found on pages 13-15 of the Planning
Commission staff report.
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: PLNPCM2021-01007 Sugar House Community Plan Future Land Use Map and
PLNPCM2021-00914 Zoning Map Amendment for the former Fire Station #3
property
STAFF CONTACT: Nick Norris Planning Director, nick.norris@slcgov.com or 801-535-6173
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the proposed amendments as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This proposal would change the future land use map found
in the Sugar House Community Master Plan from “Public Lands and Institutional” to Business
District Mixed Use Town Center Scale” and change the zoning map from PL Public Lands to
CSHBD1 Sugar House Central Business District 1. The purpose for the proposal is to
consolidate the subject properties with the property to the east for future development. Both
properties are owned by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City. There is no development
proposal associated with this request.
The subject properties include four parcels of land. All four parcels are included in the proposal.
The total land area included in this proposal is approximately 0.75 acres.
January 14, 2021
Lisa Shaffer (Jan 14, 2022 11:29 MST)
01/14/2022
01/14/2022
The property currently contains two
buildings: one was the former fire
station for the Sugar House
neighborhood, and one contains a
maintenance building for the business
improvement district that maintains
public spaces in the area.
The subject properties are in an area
that the Sugar House Community
Plan identifies as an expansion of the
Sugar House central business district.
Updating the future land use map and
the zoning map are consistent with
the goals and policies recommended
in the Sugar House Community Plan.
PUBLIC PROCESS: The Sugar
House Community Council was
notified of the proposal on September
27, 2021, starting the 45-day public
comment period. The Sugar House
Community Council Land Use
Committee discussed the item at their
October 11, 2021 meeting. Property
owners and tenants within 300 feet of
the subject property were also notified of the 45-day public comment period. Information was
posted on the Planning Division website and the notices provided a link to the online
information.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 8, 2022. The public hearing was
noticed by a direct mailing to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the subject
properties, posted on the City and Statue of Utah Public Notice website, emailed to the Planning
Division list serve, and signs were posted on the property advertising the meeting.
After he public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted a motion recommending that the City
Council adopt the proposal. More detailed information on public input can be found in the
Planning Commission staff report.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a) PC Agenda of December 8, 2021 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes of December 8, 2021 (Click to Access)
c) Planning Commission Staff Report of December 8, 2021 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1) Project Chronology
2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3) Original Petition
4) Mailing List
1
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2021
(Amending the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 1085 East Simpson Avenue, 1095
East Simpson Avenue, 1097 East Simpson Avenue, and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive to rezone
those properties from PL Public Lands District to CSHBD1 Sugar House Business District) and
amending the Sugar House Community Plan Future Land Use Map)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 1085 East
Simpson Avenue, 1095 East Simpson Avenue, 1097 East Simpson Avenue and 1104 East
Sugarmont Drive to rezone those properties from PL Public Lands District to CSHBD 1 Sugar
House Business District pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2021-00914 and amending the
Sugar House Community Future Land Use Map pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2021-
01007.
WHEREAS, Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a petition to rezone properties located at
1085 East Simpson Avenue, 1095 East Simpson Avenue, 1097 East Simpson Avenue and 1104
East Sugarmont Drive to rezone those properties from PL Public Lands District to CSHBD1
Sugar House Business District pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2021-00914 and amending
the Sugar House Community Future Land Use Map with respect to the property from Public
Lands and Institutional to Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale pursuant to petition
number PLNPCM2021-01007; and
WHEREAS, at its December 8, 2021 meeting, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission
held a public hearing and voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt
Lake City Council on said applications; and
WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on this matter, the city council has determined
that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
2
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the properties located at 1085 East Simpson Avenue, 1095 East
Simpson Avenue, 1097 East Simpson Avenue and 1104 East Sugarmont Drive (Tax ID Nos. 16-
20-252-001; 16-20-252-002; 21-20-252-003 and 16-20-252-005), which are more particularly
described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, are rezoned from PL Public Lands District to
CSHBD1 Sugar House Business District.
SECTION 2. Amending the Sugar House Community Master Plan. The Future Land
Use Map of the Sugar House Community Master Plan shall be and hereby is amended to change
the future land use designation of the properties identified in Exhibit “A” from Public Lands and
Institutional to Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of ____________, 2022.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
3
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2022
Published: ______________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: _________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney
December 20, 2021
4
Exhibit “A”
Legal descriptions of the properties to be rezoned:
Parcel 16-20-252-001
COM AT NW COR LOT 4 BLK 3 GRANITE SUB PLAT A S 0^14’48” W 151.61 FT N
46^19’51” W 60.28 FT NW’LY ALG CURVE TO LEFT 202.5 FT S 89^45’15” E 211.65 FT S
0^14’48” W 1.31 FT TO BEG0.32 AC BEING IN LOT 11 BLK 45 10 AC A.
Parcel 16-20-252-002
COM NW COR LOT 4, BLK 3, GRANITE SUB PLAT “A”, SE’LY ALG CURVE TO RIGHT
105.05 FT; S 43^40’09” W 119.64 FT; N 0^14’48” E 151.61 FT TO BEG.
Parcel 16-20-252-003
COM N 0^14’48” E 47 FT FR SW COR LOT 4, BLK 3, GRANITE SUB PLAT A; S 46^19’51”
E 68.15 FT; S 89^56’ E 53.396 FT; N 0^14’48” E 109.306 FT; NW’LY ALG CURVE TO L
31.88 FT; S 43^40’09” W 119.641 FT TO BEG.
Parcel 16-20-252-005
COM AT NW COR LOT 4, BLK 3, GRANITE SUB PLAT A, SE’LY ALG CURVE TO R
136.933 FT; N 0^14’48” E 46.093 FT; NW’LY ALG CURVE TO L 64.526 FT; N 89^45’15” W
54.792 FT TO BEG.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
3. ORIGINAL PETITION
4. MAILING LIST
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2021-00914 and PLNPCM20221-01007
August 23, 2021 The mayor initiated a petition to update the community master plan and
zoning of the property where the former Sugar House Fire Station was
located.
September 27, 2021 Petition assigned to Nick Norris, Planning Director, for staff analysis and
processing.
September 28, 2021 Petition routed to each City Department and Division for review and
comment.
September 28, 2021 Early engagement period started by sending an email containing
preliminary information sent to all Community Council Chairs informing
them of the proposed text amendments, and that Planning Commission
and City Council meetings would be scheduled in the future. Notice also
sent to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the proposal.
September 28, 2021 Public information posted to the Planning Division website explaining the
proposal and containing proposed text of code changes.
September 28, 2021 Email notice of the digital open house sent to the Planning Division list-
serve. This email is sent every two weeks with each item that is in the
public engagement phase.
October 11, 2021 Presentation to the Sugar House Land Use Committee.
November 24, 2021 Public notice for December 20, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing
sent to Division list serve, posted on city website, and posted on Utah
Public Meeting website. Property posted with sign advertising publich
earing.
December 8, 2021 Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and conducted a public
hearing. The Planning Commission adopted a motion recommending that
the City Council adopt the proposal.
2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition P:NPCM2021-00914 and PLNPCM2021-01007 – A
petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to amend the Sugar House Community Master Plan and the
Salt Lake City Zoning Map for properties located at approximately 1085 Simpson (2 parcels with the
same address), 1095 Simpson, 1097 Simpson and 1104 Sugarmont Drive. The proposal would modify the
future land use designation in the Sugar House Community Plan from "Public Lands and Institutional" to
" Business District Mixed Use Town Center Scale" and the zoning map from PL Public Lands to
CSHBD-1 Central Sugar House Business District 1. The purpose of the proposal is to facility the future
development of the site. No development proposals are being considered at this time. The City Council
may consider other future land use designations or zoning districts as part of this proposal.
DATE: Date #1 and Date #2
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
All persons interested and present will be given an opportunity to be heard in this matter.
This meeting will be held via electronic means, while potentially also providing for an in-
person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building,
located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. If you are interested in
participating during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting, please visit the website
www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings/ or call 801-535-7654 to obtain connection
information.
Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-7654 or
sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any
source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Nick Norris at 801-535-6173 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday or via e-mail at nick.norris@slcgov.com
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance
in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make
a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or
relay service 711.
3. ORIGINAL PETITION
4. MAILING LIST
OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP
UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY 669 WEST 200 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101
SUGARHOUSE VETERINARY HOSPITAL BUILDING PTRN 2206 S MCCLELLAND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTON KY 40555
SUGARMONT LLC 2121 S MCCLELLAND ST #303 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 S STATE ST # 425 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
SUGARHOUSE DIXON, LLC 11 SPANISH BAY DR NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
SALT LAKE COUNTY PO BOX 144575 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
SALT LAKE CITY PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
SALT LAKE CITY CORP.PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
Unknown PO BOX 145518 SALT LAKE CITY UT UT 84114
YORK FAMILY 2257, LLC 2257 S 1100 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK OF SALT LAKE CITY UTAH 425 PIKE ST # BRO79 SEATTLE WA 98101
CMRK LLC; RLR INVESTMENTS #1 LLC 2280 S HIGHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
DEE'S SUGARHOUSE INVESTMENTS LLC 777 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
Current Occupant 975 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 2200 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 2220 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 2191 S MCCLELLAND ST Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 1055 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 1044 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 1040 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 1085 E SIMPSON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 1095 E SIMPSON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 1097 E SIMPSON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 1104 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 1116 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 2234 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 2262 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 2274 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 2227 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Current Occupant 2201 S HIGHLAND DR Salt Lake City UT 84106
Nick Norris c/o Planning Division PO BOX 145480 Salt Lake City UT 84111
Item C2
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:March 1, 2022
RE: 1193 West California Avenue Zoning Map Amendment
PLNPCM2021-00914 & PLNPCM2021-00709
MOTION 1 (adopt)
I move that the Council adopt the ordinance
MOTION 2 (reject)
I move that the Council reject the ordinance.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:March 1, 2022
RE: 1193 West California Avenue Zoning Map Amendment
PLNPCM2021-00914 & PLNPCM2021-00709
PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE
No one spoke at the February 15, 2022 public hearing. The Council closed the hearing and deferred action
to a future Council meeting.
The following information was provided for the February 15, 2022 public hearing. It is
provided again for background purposes.
BRIEFING UPDATE
At the February 1 briefing the Council expressed general support for the proposed zoning map amendment.
A Council Member asked if the Council can ensure potential ADUs on the properties are constructed.
Planning staff stated they cannot be required. Planning also noted the applicant expressed plans to retain
ownership of the parcels for family members to occupy.
A question was asked about whether ADUs are a permitted or conditional use within the R-1/5,000 zoning
designation. Planning staff stated interior ADUs are permitted and detached ADUs are a conditional use.
They further stated the Planning Commission intends to initiate the process to make all ADUs a permitted
use.
A Council Member asked about curb cut placement if the zoning map amendment is adopted. Planning
staff stated development plans have not been submitted at this point. Details such as curb cuts would be
addressed during plan review.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: February 1, 2022
Set Date: February 1, 2022
Public Hearing: February 15, 2022
Potential Action: March 1, 2022
Page | 2
Note: A Council staff report was not prepared for this item.
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2021-00709
1193 W California Avenue Zoning Map Amendment
STAFF CONTACT: Amanda Roman, Principal Planner
amanda.roman@slcgov.com or (801) 535-7660
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to approve the proposed Zoning Map amendment.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Kesaia Young, the property owner of 1193 W California
Avenue, initiated a petition to amend the Zoning Map in July of 2021. The request is to rezone the
property from R-1/7,000 (Single Family Residential) to R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential). On
October 27, 2021, the Planning Commission heard the petition and forwarded a positive
recommendation to the City Council to amend the Zoning Map. If approved, the property owner
intends to subdivide the property and build two new single family homes that will potentially
include two attached ADUs. The property owner anticipates retaining ownership of both
properties.
The proposed rezone is compatible with the platted South Salt Lake subdivision and reflects the
existing development pattern, which consists of single- and two-family dwellings on lots less than
7,000 square feet in size. The permitted and conditional land uses are identical in both the R-
1/7,000 and R-1/5,000 zones.
January 14, 2021
Lisa Shaffer (Jan 14, 2022 11:28 MST)
01/14/2022
01/14/2022
In addition to the difference in minimum lot square footage, the R-1/5,000 zone also has reduced
rear and side yard building setbacks. The proposed change would allow for the subdivision of the
property but is not expected to change the character of the neighborhood or have adverse impacts
on future growth.
If the zoning map amendment is approved, the property owner would be allowed to redevelop the
site in accordance with the R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential) zoning district standards and
permitted land uses.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
•Information concerning this petition was sent to the chair of the Glendale Community
Council on July 27, 2021.
o The Glendale Community Council did not provide formal comments.
•The surrounding property owners within 300’ received an early notification by mail on
July 28, 2021.
•Public notification for the Planning Commission Hearing was mailed October 15, 2021 to
all neighbors within 300’ of the Zoning Map amendment site.
•The petition was heard by the Planning Commission on October 27, 2021. The Planning
Commission voted unanimously (8-0) to forward a positive recommendation to the City
Council regarding the proposed zoning map amendment.
o There were no public comments received prior to or during the Planning
Commission meeting.
California Avenue 1200 West Emery St. Concord St. Subject
Property
PLANNING COMMISSION RECORDS of OCTOBER 27, 2021:
Planning Commission Agenda
Planning Commission Minutes
Planning Commission Staff Report
EXHIBITS:
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Hearing
3. Original Petition
4. Mailing List
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2022
(Amending the zoning of property located at approximately
1193 West California Avenue from R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential District
to R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential District)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located approximately
1193 West California Avenue from R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential District to R-1/5,000
Single Family Residential District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00709.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on October
27, 2021 on an application submitted by Kesaia Young (“Applicant”), property owner, to rezone
property located at 1193 West California Avenue (Tax ID No. 15-14-104-001) (the “Property”)
from R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential District to R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential
District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00709; and
WHEREAS, at its October 27, 2021 meeting, the planning commission voted in favor of
forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said application; and
WHEREAS, following a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined
that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the Property identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be
and hereby is rezoned from R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential District to R-1/5,000 Single
Family Residential District.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2022.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2022.
Published: ______________.
Ordinance rezoning 1193 W California Avenue
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney
January 3, 2022
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Description of Property to be Rezoned:
1193 W California Avenue
Tax ID No. 15-14-104-001
0702 BEG S 7.5 FT FR NW COR LOT 1, BLK 2, SOUTH SALT LAKE SUB; S 92.4 FT; E 128.8
FT; N 94.63 FT; W'LY 129.8 FT TO BEG 4902-1099 5426-1472 5460-3011 6238-1762
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3. Original Petition
4. Mailing List
1. Project Chronology
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
PETITION:
July 12, 2021
July 20, 2021
July 27, 2021
July 28, 2021
July 30, 2021
September 10, 2021
October 15, 2021
October 15, 2021
October 27, 2021
PLNPCM2021-00709 - 1193 W California Avenue Zoning Map
Amendment
Petition for the zoning map amendment received by the Salt Lake
City Planning Division
Petition assigned to Amanda Roman, Principal Planner, for staff
analysis and processing.
Information about the proposal was sent to the Chair of the Glendale
Community Council in order to solicit public comments and start
the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment period.
Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all
residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project
site providing information about the proposal and how to give public
input on the project.
Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on
the proposal. The Online Open House period started on July 30,
2021 and ended on September 10, 2021.
The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations
ended. No formal comments were submitted to staff by the
recognized organizations to date related to this proposal.
Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the
Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting of October
27, 2021. Public hearing notice mailed.
Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the
Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the
property.
The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on October 27,
2021. By a unanimous vote of 8-0, the Planning
Commission forwarded a Positive recommendation to City
Council for the proposed zoning map change.
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2021-00709 1193 W California
Avenue Zoning Map Amendment – Salt Lake City received a request from Kesaia Young,
the property owner, to amend the zoning map for a property located at approximately 1193 W
California Avenue. The proposal would rezone the entire property from R-1/7,000 (Single
Family Residential) to R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential). The amendment would allow the
property to be subdivided into two lots that each meet the minimum lot area for a single-family
dwelling. The Master Plan is not being changed. The property is located within Council
District 2, represented by Dennis Faris. (Staff contact: Amanda Roman at 801-535-7660 or
amanda.roman@slcgov.com)
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive
comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held:
DATE:
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b). Please visit
https://www.slc.gov/council/news/featured-news/virtually-attend-city-
council-meetings/ to learn how you can share your comments live during
electronic City Council meetings. If you would like to provide feedback
or comment, via email or phone, please contact us at: 801-535-7654 (24-
Hour comment line) or by email at: council.comments@slcgov.com .
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Amanda Roman at 801-535-7660 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday or via e-mail at amanda.roman@slcgov.com.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.(P 19-19)
3. Original Petition
Linda Mitchell Accepted - July 12, 2021 PLNPCM2021-00709
Zoning Amendment Questionnaire
Parcel Number: 15141040010000
1.A statement declaring the purpose of the zoning amendment: The proposed Master Plan
zoning amendment change from the R-1-7000 designation to a R-1-5000 designation supports the
Westside Master Plan and 5YP for community growth through the subdivision of a large,
underutilized lot. This Master Plan zoning amendment will enable the parcel to support more
housing by subdividing the lot to build single-family homes with ADUs on each lot. The Growing
SLC: Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 (“5YP”) acknowledges that “such options would also help
restore the ‘missing middle’ housing types…restoring choices for a wider variety of household
sizes, from seniors to young families” (5YP pg. 19). The proposed development would allow for
two single family homes with ADUs on the large, underutilized lot while blending into the existing
neighborhood and provide housing solutions for diverse demographics (students, seniors, young
families, multi-generational families). The development can further materialize the objectives stated
in the Five Year Housing Plan. The first Goal expounded in the Five Year Plan recognizes the need
to “increase housing options…by seeking policy reforms that can enhance the flexibility of the
land-use code and create an efficient and predictable development process for community
growth” (5YP pg. 17).
2.A description of the proposed zoning amendment: The property is currently zoned as R-1-7000
Glendale Residential Neighborhood in the Westside Community. The purpose of the R-1-7000
Glendale residential neighborhood is to promote lots not less than seven thousand (7,000) square
feet in size, suitable for parts of Glendale locations. The proposed zoning designation for the
property is R-1-5000; a zoning designation that allows for a majority of single family homes, up to
twenty eight eight feet (28’) in height measured to the ridge of the roof. The master plan zoning
amendment would continue to allow lots not less than seven thousand (7,000) square feet in size
as envisioned in the Glendale residential neighborhood zoning, and would further provide the
flexibility to enhance housing type diversity in the neighborhood.
3.List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area: The current
zone does not accurately reflect much of the existing housing stock adjacent to the subject
property. In fact, the surrounding land uses, with the exception of the southern boundary and
across the street along the western boundary, are much more dense than what could be built on
the subject property under the current zone. Adjoining this property to the east is duplex on a lot
less than five thousand (5,000) square feet in size, as well as a single-family residential home on a
lot less than five thousand (5,000) square fees in size. One block to the east is a two story, stacked
condominium complex zoned RMF-35, arguably the most dense zoning island of property in the
area. Across California Avenue to the north are single family homes in the R-1-5000 Glendale zone,
and duplex multi-family homes in the R-2 Glendale zone, which is the reasoning behind the
proposed change of zoning that would be consistent with the majority of adjoining homes and
neighborhood directly across California Avenue.
Glendale is a unique and historic neighborhood including single-family and two-family dwellings
with a variety of yards, lot sizes, and bulk characteristics. The RMF-35 zone is really the outlier in
an area that is mostly surrounded by single-family and duplex housing types. Rezoning the
property to R-1-5000 will provide the ability to add additional housing that blends well with
neighboring community. At the same time the rezoning of the property will allow for the
“underutilized parcel to allow for small lot single-family residential…with ADU…in fill
development…that will meet size and design standards to ensure community compatibility,” which
is envisioned in Salt Lake City’s The Westside Master Plan (WMP pg. 33).
4.Is the request amending the zoning map? The request is amending the Zoning Map. The parcel
number to be changed is 15141040010000.
5.Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance? there is no request to amend the
text.
4. Mailing List
OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STATOWN_ZIP
STEFAN JULIUS NIEDERAUER; MARK QUINN NIEDERAUER; GABRIELE NIEDERA 1305 S CONCORD ST SALT LAKE UT 84104
V & K INVESTMENTS, LLC PO BOX 25512 SALT LAKE UT 84125
CYNTHIA GROW 1300 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
STEVE R SR MCCOY; STEVE R JR MCCOY (JT)1208 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
N.P.M.C., INC.20 W CENTURY PARK WY SOUTH SAL UT 84115
CONCORD, LLC 1947 E STAG HILL CIR DRAPER UT 84020
CORP OF PRES BISHOP OF CH OF JC OF LDS 50 E NORTH TEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE UT 84150
MARGARETA B DIAZ 1316 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104
AUSTIN BLACK; TRISTANA YEGGE (JT)1320 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104
LIEM T NGUYEN; TUYET DAO THI LE (JT)963 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
JUAN GONZALEZ GARCIA; MAYRA PRADO (JT)1308 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104
RONALD BARRETT; RODOLFO G REVELES (JT)1285 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104
LTD SHARED EQUITIES A 1373 E SKYLINE DR BOUNTIFU UT 84010
SALT LAKE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION PO BOX 18894 SALT LAKE UT 84118
FAITH M SAVAGE; JAMES DENZIL SAVAGE (JT)1352 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
MOSIANA L MAU 1366 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
UTAH LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY OF SALT LAKE CITY PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE UT 84114
MICHAEL R WEIS; LUCIA R WEIS (JT)12235 S 4000 W RIVERTON UT 84096
SIONE T TONGAMANA; DUSTIN PAUL BISHOP 1207 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
YONI MENDOZA (JT)1344 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
AVALISI LAPUAHO; ANA LAPUAHO (JT)1193 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
ERIC NESS 1345 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
PERLITA N RAMIREZ; JULIO A RAMIREZ (TC)1361 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
ANNETTE S JENSEN 1367 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
JOSE JESUS RIOS 1373 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
MARIANNE WILLIAMS 1379 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
GORDON G WATKINS; CLARINDA S WATKINS (JT)1338 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104
RAUL M FIGUEROA; CANDELARIA FIGUEROA (JT)1344 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104
RONALD L JOHNSON; VICKI JO JOHNSON (JT)1350 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104
GHB TR 1356 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104
CIPRIANO OROZCO 1362 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104
VICTORIA RICCARDI RICHARDS; JANETTE RICCARDI (JT)1368 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104
NAGENDRA DEV 1374 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE UT 84104
EUSEBIO REYES-RODRIGUEZ; IGNACIO REYES-RODRIGUEZ (TC)1353 S 1200 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
ROBERT KELLER (JT)1788 E 5600 S HOLLADAY UT 84121
SOUTHLAND CORPORATION PO BOX 711 DALLAS TX 75221
KYLE J HAMMOND; JAMIE B HAMMOND (JT)459 COUNTRY CLUB STANSBURY UT 84074
GERALD D BURT; CHRISTOPHER S BURT (TC)3045 E LOUISE AVE SALT LAKE UT 84109
Current Occupant 1226 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1306 S 1200 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1281 S CONCORD ST Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1301 S 1200 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1172 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1315 S 1200 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1291 S EMERY ST Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1235 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1365 S CONCORD ST Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1372 S 1200 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1177 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1165 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1363 S EMERY ST Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1369 S EMERY ST Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1157 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1353 S UTAHNA DR Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1357 S UTAHNA DR Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Item C3
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:March 1, 2022
RE: 2060 North 2200 West Zoning Map Amendment
PLNPCM2021-00575
MOTION 1 (adopt)
I move that the Council adopt the ordinance
MOTION 2 (reject)
I move that the Council reject the ordinance.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:March 1, 2022
RE: 2060 North 2200 West Zoning Map Amendment
PLNPCM2021-00575
PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE
No one spoke at the February 15, 2022 public hearing. The Council closed the hearing and deferred action
to a future Council meeting.
The following information was provided for the February 15, 2022 public hearing. It is
provided again for background purposes.
BRIEFING UPDATE
At the February 1 briefing the Council expressed general support for the proposed zoning map amendment.
The applicant stated they do not have specific plans for the property other than hoping to consolidate the
subject parcel with their parcel that surrounds on three sides. Future use will be determined at a later date.
Note: A Council staff report was not prepared for this item.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: February 1, 2022
Set Date: February 1, 2022
Public Hearing: February 15, 2022
Potential Action: March 1, 2022
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: Zoning Map Amendment at approximately 2060 North 2200 W, Petition
PLNPCM2021-00575
STAFF CONTACT: Krissy Gilmore, Principal Planner, Kristina.Gilmore@slcgov.com, 385-
535-7780
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to change the zoning map to M-1 (Light Manufacturing) from the current designation
of AG-2 (Agricultural) for one parcel.
BUDGET IMPACT: None.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Chad Salmon, property owner, has submitted a zoning map amendment to amend the existing
zoning of AG-2 (Agricultural District) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing). The subject property is
located at 2060 North 2200 West and is surrounded by M-1 zoning. The amendment is to
implement the master plan zoning and to accommodate future commercial land uses. No specific
site development proposal has been submitted at this time. For specific information regarding the
proposal, please refer to the Planning Commission Staff Report.
One parcel is part of this request and contains a single-family dwelling and related agricultural
accessory structures. The property is located within the boundaries of the Inland Port (IP) Overlay
District. The IP Overlay permits uses not currently allowed in the AG-2 zoning by allowing all M-
1 uses through the City’s conditional use process. The change in zoning designation only impacts
the approval process that must be followed for a proposed use and has negligible impact on what
could ultimately be developed on the property.
January 14, 2021
Lisa Shaffer (Jan 14, 2022 11:16 MST)
01/14/2022
01/14/2022
PUBLIC PROCESS:
• Information about this petition and a request for comments was sent to the Chair of the
Westpointe Community Council on June 23, 2021.
• Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property
owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing notice about the proposal and
information on how to give public input on the project on June 23, 2021.
• The Westpointe Community Council requested attendance from city staff at a community
event on August 3, 2021. Staff attended the event and did not receive any comments
regarding the proposal at that time.
• At the Public Hearing of August 25, 2021, written comments were submitted via email
from the Chair of the Westpointe CC for the Planning Commission’s consideration. Those
comments were not reflected in the staff report. A copy of the submitted letter is included
in Attachment 4 of this transmittal - Written Comments Submitted to Planning
Commission.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
PC Agenda for August 25, 2021 (Click to Access)
PC Minutes of August 25, 2021 (Click to Access)
PC Staff Report for August 25, 2021 (Click to Access Staff Report)
EXHIBITS
1. Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Hearing
3. Petition Application
4. Written Comments Submitted to Planning Commission 2200 W 2100 N
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2022
(Amending the zoning map pertaining to one parcel of property located at
2060 North 2200 West Street to rezone the property
from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to one parcel of property located at
2060 North 2200 West Street to rezone the property from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1
Light Manufacturing District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00575.
WHEREAS, Chad Salmon submitted an application on behalf of the property owner,
Salmon Investments, LLC, to rezone property located at 2060 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID
No. 08-21-226-001-0000) from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District
pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00575; and
WHEREAS, at its August 25, 2021 meeting, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission
held a public hearing and voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt
Lake City Council on said application; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the parcel located at 2060 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No.
08-21-226-001-0000), and as more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, shall
be and hereby is rezoned from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2022.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2022.
Published: ______________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney
December 17, 2021
Exhibit “A”
Legal Descriptions of the four to be rezoned to M-1 Light Manufacturing District
Parcel located at 2060 North 2200 West Street:
Parcel No. 08-21-226-001-0000
0106 COM 1309 FT W & 153 FT S FR NE COR SEC 21 T 1N R 1W SL MER S 140 FT E 200
FT N 140 FT W 200 FT TO BEG 0.64 AC 6150-2588 7490-2237 9980-8541
1) CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2021-00575
June 3, 2021 Salmon Investments, LLC submitted an application for a Zoning
Map Amendment.
June 15, 2021 Petition PLNPCM2021-00575 was assigned to Krissy Gilmore,
Senior Planner, for staff analysis and processing.
June 23, 2021 Notice sent to Recognized Community Organizations informing
them of the petition. Early notification of the project was also sent
to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the proposal.
August 3, 2021 The proposal was presented at the Westpointe Night Out
community event. Planning staff was in attendance to answer
questions about the proposal.
August 11, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing notices emailed to interested
parties and residents/property owners who requested notice.
Agenda posted to the Planning Commission website and the State
of Utah Public Notice webpage.
August 19, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report posted.
August 25, 2021 Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a positive
recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed text
amendment.
2) NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2021-00535 – Chad Salmon,
property owner, has submitted a zoning map amendment to amend the existing AG-2
(Agricultural District) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing). The amendment is to implement the master
plan zoning and to accommodate future commercial land uses. The subject property is located at
2060 North 2200 West. No specific site development proposal has been submitted at this time.
Information on this proposal can be found in the staff report prepared for the Planning
Commission accessible from this link -
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/08.August/00575.2200WRezo
ne.StaffReport.pdf
As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive
comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider
adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE: Date #1 and Date #2
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: **This meeting will not have a physical location.
**This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation. If you are interested in participating in the Public Hearing, please visit our
website at https://www.slc.gov/council/ to learn how you can share your comments during
the meeting. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at
(801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments
received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Krissy Gilmore at 385-535-7780 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday or via e-mail at Kristina.gilmore@slcgov.com.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours
in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days
in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.
3) PETITION APPLICATION
4) WRITTEN COMMENTS SUBMITTED TO
PLANNING
COMMISSION
From:
To:Planning Public Comments
Cc:Rebollo, Joshua; Amy@treeutah.org; DennisFaris@gmail.com; Rogers, James; Norris, Nick; Gilmore, Kristina
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Comments for Aug 25 Planning Commission mtg regarding PLNPCM2021-00575 (agenda item #5)
Date:Tuesday, August 24, 2021 12:24:49 PM
Importance:High
Salt Lake City under Mayor Mendenhall has been very active in promoting the planting of trees on
the westside in order to mitigate air pollution and improve the area. Additionally Ivory Homes has
augmenting the City’s efforts with their own 30,000 tree planting initiative. It is therefore more
than frustrating that the Planning Commission is now considering a re-zoning request which would
unnecessarily destroy a mature tree canopy on 2200 West. (See attached photos). Therefore,
members of the local Community Council, are submitting an objection to the AG-2 to M-1 rezoning
at 2060 N. 2200 West. Consideration of such rezoning should be delayed until the updated North
Point Master Plan is completed. Such planning will allow the City, in concert with residents,
professional planners, and other stakeholders to determine whether it is in the City’s best interest to
allow the numerous mature trees located on this parcel to be cut-down as part of an effort to
construct a Maverick gas station on the site.
The summary in the Aug 25th planning commission agenda (item #5) states the purpose of the
change is “to implement the master plan zoning…” This is not just misleading but incorrect. The
2060 N 2200 West property lies within the Northpoint Small Area Master Plan whose stated goal is
to “eliminate potential land use conflicts with the Salt Lake International Airport while preserving
and enhancing the existing agricultural lifestyle.” This master plan, adopted in 2000, does NOT
contain any M-1 zoning. Instead, the plan’s zoning map consists of parcels zoned BP (Business Park
), AG-2 and AG-5. Whether area properties should include M-1 zoning is one of the reasons both
developers and residents agree on the need to update the Northpoint Small Area Master Plan. The
community’s experience with Ivory Development in developing a BP zoning overlay for the area
illustrated the need and ability to update the master plan with strategies that resolve existing
problems. Not long afterward (Jan 2019) , the City Council agreed to fund such an update.
Currently Salt Lake City has entered a $100,000 contract with Logan Simpson to update this
master plan. Members of the consulting team have already attended community council meetings,
manned booths at community events, and started discussions with a diverse steering committee of
area stakeholders. This planning process needs to be supported rather than undermined. Such
efforts should not be “undercut” by adopting premature re-zoning proposals.
It is ironic that the Northpoint Small Area Master Plan came about as a result of circumstances
similar to what we face today. According to the Plan’s historical Introduction when Salt Lake City
took steps to rezone Northpoint for development residents pushed back. The City Council
responded in 1999 by adopting “a six-month moratorium to allow the creation of a small area plan
for Northpoint.” More than twenty years later, the residents of this unique area again ask the
City to adopt a moratorium to ensure the update master planning process is successfully
implemented.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, Dorothy P. Owen, chair Westpointe Community Council
Item F1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke
Budget and Policy Analyst
DATE:March 1, 2022
RE: Board of Equalization Report and Ordinance Adopting Central Business Improvement
Assessment Area (April 21, 2022, to April 21, 2025)
MOTION 1 – ADOPT ORDINANCE
I move that the Council accept and adopt the findings and recommendations of the Board of
Equalization for the Central Business Improvement Assessment Area Number DA-CBIA-22. I further
move that the Council adopt an ordinance confirming the equalized assessment list, levying the
assessment, and related matters.
MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT
I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item.
MEMORANDUM TO CITY COUNCIL
____________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council
DATE: February 24, 2022
FROM: Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder
SUBJECT: CBIA-22 Comment following BOE Determination/Appeal
OVERVIEW:
The CBIA-22 Board of Equalization (BOE) Findings report was distributed on January
21, 2022 to property owners who attended the BOE meetings with concerns. The report
identified the findings on specific parcels of property owned by individuals disputing the
assessment calculations and cited benefits.
Following the distribution of the report, on Thursday, January 27, 2022 Mr. Tom Bunce
(representing SK Hart Properties at 44 West 300 South) sent an email to the City
Recorder requesting the communication be forwarded to the “Equalization Board
and/or City Council as appropriate.” (Exhibit A)
The City Recorder did not forward the comment to the Council at that time, and as the
Board of Equalization after having made its findings is essentially not in existence was
evaluating next steps. Mr. Bunce’s email doesn’t use the word “appeal” however,
evaluation with the Attorney’s team concluded that because Mr. Bunce’s email
mentioned the City Council, it is best to consider it an appeal submitted within the 15-
day appeal period identified in the Notice of Assessment and Board of Equalization
Hearings. (Exhibit B)
Minutes were completed for the BOE hearings and have been included with this memo
for your review. (Exhibit C)
In preparation for the City Council’s March 1 meeting, wherein the ordinance to confirm
the assessment list and levy an assessment against certain properties for the CBIA-22 is
being considered, Mr. Bunce’s email and related information is being provided for your
review with the acknowledgement that this was an oversight by the City Recorder’s
office to not provide the content sooner. Under the circumstances, I recommend the
Council consider and decide the appeal based on the written information provided to
you by Mr. Bunce and the Administration in the following pages.
CLT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION RE PROCESS AND STATUTES
The Central Business Investment Area (CBIA) is a mechanism to fund marketing,
promotion, advocacy, and other initiatives to encourage and maximize vibrancy and
activity in the City’s Central Business District.
• Relevant Statutes and Ordinances
The definition of "economic promotion activities" in the SAA statute, Utah Code
Section 11-42-102(18) is as follows:
(18) "Economic promotion activities" means activities that promote
economic growth in a commercial area of a local entity, including:
(a) sponsoring festivals and markets;
(b) promoting business investment or activities;
(c) helping to coordinate public and private actions; and
(d) developing and issuing publications designed to improve the
economic
well-being of the commercial area.
• All properties within the boundaries are assessed at .00142 taxable value
assessment rate, unless the property is designated as residential, ecclesiastical,
government owned or under $20,000 in valuation.
• Although a percentage of the funding goes towards advocacy, such as the
Ambassadors Program, it does not cover costs of law enforcement and policing
within the area or for specific properties.
EXHIBIT A: Email from Mr. Tom Bunce via email to City Recorder
EXHIBIT B: Notice of Board of Equalization Hearing, Outline of Appeal Process
EXHIBIT C: Board of Equalization Minutes
From:Trishman, Cindy Lou
To:Tom Bunce
Cc:Doug White
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) RE: Board of Equalization Hearings: Utah Central Business Improvement Assessment Area N.
DA-CBIA-22
Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 5:08:00 PM
Mr. Bunce,
Thank you. I have received your email. Thank you. I am evaluating the process for sending
this along. I will be in touch on Monday.
Thank you for your patience.
CIndy Lou TrIshMan
Salt Lake City Recorder
reCorder’s offICe
saLT Lake CITy CorporaTIon
801.535.6223
801.859.8873 (cell)
From: Tom Bunce
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2022 2:56 PM
To: Trishman, Cindy Lou <Cindy.Trishman@slcgov.com>
Cc: Doug White
Subject: (EXTERNAL) RE: Board of Equalization Hearings: Utah Central Business Improvement
Assessment Area N. DA-CBIA-22
Hi Cindy,
Will you please confirm receipt? Have a nice weekend.
Thanks,
Tom
From: Tom Bunce
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 11:29 AM
To: Cindy Trishman <cindy.trishman@slcgov.com>
Cc: Doug White
Subject: Board of Equalization Hearings: Utah Central Business Improvement Assessment Area N.
DA-CBIA-22
Dear Cindy,
I am writing you as a follow-up to the Board of Equalization Hearing that I participated in on January
11, 2022, which you hosted virtually. I represent SK Hart Properties at 44 W 300 S, Salt Lake City. I
request that you please forward this communication to the Equalization Board and/or City Council as
appropriate. If we need to record something or make some sort of official submission, please
advise.
There are several issues I addressed in the meeting. The first is our disagreement with the
assessment rate we are being charged for certain downtown services and amenities. The unit cost in
the assessment notice we received is $0.00142 for properties DA 1183 15 01 283 003 0000, DA 183
15 01 283 002 0000 and DA 1183 15 01 283 004 0000. We are disputing this rate and requesting a
rate reduction for the following reasons.
1. Our property is mostly non-street facing office space, except for the approximate 2,000
square foot salon tenant, which is on the street. Given our office and salon tenants generally
vacate the property by 6:00 pm, we believe our business only marginally benefits from the
Central Business Improvement Assessment. We do not own bars, restaurants or other street
level business that might benefit from night festivities and other related night activities
supported by the Assessment.
2. Homelessness has negatively affected our business. It is our understanding that that a
portion of the assessment provides for homeless services, however, our experience is that
homelessness is not being addressed and that the homeless are harassing businesses and
patrons. Please allow me to provide you with several examples of how the homeless situation
has negatively affected our business.
On December 17, 2021, a suspected homeless man was conducting himself indecently
in front of our salon during business hours for all employees and patrons to see. Police
were called and the man reacted in a further spectacle by screaming and what we
consider to be assaulting, if not seriously disrespecting the responding officer. The
police ushered the man down the street, but he has since returned to conduct other
mischief.
On December 18, 2021, a suspected homeless man was found sleeping in the entry of
the salon. I have this recorded on video and can send it to you upon request.
On December 19, 2021, a human defecated in the entry of the salon
On December 20, 2021, the salon owner found a shiv near the entrance (photo
attached)
On January 15, 2022, an individual, obviously high on drugs, and suspected homeless,
gained access to the roof of American Towers. The man proceeded to toss metal patio
furniture from the 300 foot high roof nearly striking, and possibly killing, a salon
employee and damaging the sidewalk awning over the entrance (photos attached).
On January 17, 2022, the same man who was suspected of throwing furniture from the
roof on the 15th returned again, but was fortunately arrested by the police.
We are open to further discussion and are willing and able to provide additional incident reports
with documentation if requested. We are appreciative to Salt Lake City and supportive of effective
Downtown services such as holiday lighting, however, based on our view of the situation and the
issues presented, we do not believe the Central Business Improvement Assessment largely benefits
our business. Therefore, we are requesting that the assessment unit rate be reduced by 90%.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Please contact me with any questions or
comments.
Tom Bunce
CFO
S.K. Hart Family of Companies
630 E. South Temple
Salt Lake City, UT 84102
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT AND BOARD OF EQUALIZATION HEARINGS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the assessment list for the Salt Lake City, Utah
Central Business Improvement Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA-22 (the “Assessment
Area”) has now been completed and is available for examination at the Salt Lake City
Recorder’s office located at 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake City, Utah. The
City Council has appointed a Board of Equalization to hear and consider arguments from
any person who claims to be aggrieved by the proposed assessments to be levied within
the Assessment Area, including arguments relating to (a) the amount of benefits accruing
to the property proposed to be assessed or (b) the amount of the proposed assessment.
The assessments levied are for the purpose paying for the proposed activities, which
include, but are not limited to, advertising, marketing, special events, festivals,
transportation, newsletters, publications, banners, Christmas lighting, security, special
projects, housing, town meetings, government policy, cultural promotion, reports, surveys,
homeless services and other promotional activities (the “Economic Promotion Activities”)
in the downtown area (for the benefit of the properties within the Assessment Area). The
total amount of the assessments to be levied against benefitted property within Assessment
Area is expected to be $5,251,285.00, and will be based upon (i) 2021 taxable property
values (the “Base Assessment”), plus (ii) linear feet (except that corner lots will not be
assessed for both frontages as applicable, only one) on certain properties with frontage on
certain streets for special holiday lights (the “Holiday Light Assessment” and together with
the Base Assessment, the “Assessment”). The unit cost is each property’s proportionate
share of the Economic Promotion Activities applicable to the property as described in this
notice. Funding from assessments provides only a portion of the total budget for the
Assessment Area’s programs and activities. Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”) will not
contribute any of its own funds for the Economic Promotion Activities; however, the City
anticipates that the manager of the Assessment Area will secure non-assessment funds from
other sources such as grants, foundations, promotions, contributions, earned income, and
sponsorships.
As required by law, three persons have been duly appointed to act as the Board of
Equalization on the assessments proposed to be levied on the property benefited within the
Assessment Area. The Board of Equalization for assessments proposed to be levied on the
affected property within the Assessment Area will meet via electronic means or in person
at the City & County Building, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah, on January 11, 2022,
between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m.; on January 12, 2022, between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m.; and on January 13, 2022, between the hours of 1:00 p.m. and
2:00 p.m. to hear and consider any objections to and make any corrections of any proposed
assessments that the Board may deem necessary to meet the requirements of the
Assessment Area Act, Title 11, Chapter 42, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended. To
participate in the meeting, please visit the website www.slc.gov/attorney/public-notices/.
The assessment list and amounts of the proposed assessment against each parcel of
property have been completed and are available for public examination from 8:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. at the Office of the City Recorder, 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake
City, Utah.
2
4875-3168-9220, v. 1
After the Board has held all hearings and has made all corrections the Board
considers necessary to comply with the law, the Board will report its findings to the City
Council of the City. Appeal from a decision of the Board of Equalization may be taken to
the City Council of the City by filing with the City Council a written notice of appeal in
the office of the City Recorder within fifteen (15) days after the date the Board’s final
report to the City Council is mailed to the affected property owners.
By resolution of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this November 16, 2021.
(SEAL)
CITY RECORDER
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (CBIA)
Tuesday, January 11, 2022
The Board of Equalization of Salt Lake City, Utah, met on Tuesday, January 11, 2022, in a Hybrid
Meeting format.
The following Board Members were present:
Nick Tarbet, Chris Norlem, Brandon Bagley
Present City Staff:
Jolynn Walz - Economic Development Office Manager, William Wright - Economic Development
Project Manager, Boyd Ferguson - Senior City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Thais
Stewart – Deputy City Recorder Operations
Consultant:
Jonathan Springmeyer - Bonneville Research
Board Member Brandon Bagley conducted the meeting.
The meeting began at 9 am.
Minutes:
Parcel #: 15-02-279-001-0000 Address: 751 W 300 S
Parcel #: 15-02-280-001-0000 Address: 735 W 300 S
Parcel #: 15-02-427-001-0000 Address: 760 W 400 S
Parcel #: 15-02-427-002-0000 Address: 735 W 300 S
Bruce Markosian explained that his family owns four parcels within the assessment area and an appeal
was presented to the Utah State Tax Commission regarding the 2020 assessment, the Judge ruled in favor
of the 2020 appeal and recommended another appeal be made for the 2021 assessment. Mr. Markosian
explained that he sent in the appeal when the notice was received but has not received confirmation that it
was received by the County, and further explained that the assessments made by the engineering
department do not reflect the appealed assessment. Mr. Markosian would like Engineering to recalculate
the assessment in accordance with the Judge’s ruling.
Jonathan Springmeyer explained that the assessments used cannot be edited and are directly
downloaded from Salt Lake County to the software used to generate assessment information.
Mr. Markosian expressed frustration regarding the timeline of the assessment and appeal process.
Mr. Springmeyer reiterated Mr. Markosian’s remarks concerning the 2020 and 2021 requests for
adjustments.
Mr. Markosian responded by adding that the Utah State Tax Commission came to an agreement to a
specific adjustment that would then use made for the years 2020 and 2021.
Mr. Springmeyer explained that the information had yet to be presented by the County and recommended
that the Board evaluate the matter once Mr. Markosian receives the official adjustment. It was noted if the
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (CBIA)
Tuesday, January 11, 2022
information does not arrive before April, 2022, it cannot be completed prior to the 2021 assessment. In
that event, any adjustments would have to be made retroactively.
Mr. Markosian indicated he would submit the information to the Engineering Department upon receipt.
Mr. Springmeyer commented the adjustments can be made, if determined by the Board with the added
context that the proposed adjustments would not negatively impact the CBIA budget.
Boyd Ferguson asked Mr. Markosian if he had any physical documentation from the court.
Mr. Markosian did not have the documentation and expressed willingness to obtain them from the court if
necessary. Copies of the appeal have been sent to the City regarding the adjustment.
No formal actions were taken noting individual determinations will be made at a later meeting.
328 Ventures LLC
Parcel #: 16-06-301-041 Address: 328 S State St
Parcel #: 16-06-301-040 Address: 338 S State St
Andy Tran requested an appeal of the assessments regarding holiday lighting. Mr. Tran explained that
the current holiday lighting does not work, it has been verified that the outlets are damaged and unable to
connect with the lighting. He expressed willingness to provide funds to get the outlets fixed.
A discussion was held regarding the holiday lighting. Public Utilities have been notified and are looking
into the issues.
SKR Properties
American Towers Condo Highrise
Parcel #: 15-01-283-002-0000 Address: 44 W 300 S
Parcel #: 15-01-283-003-0000 Address: 44 W 300 S
Parcel #: 15-01-283-004-0000 Address: 44 W 300 S
Tom Bunce commented that an assessment was made and that his business would not benefit from the
items listed in the assessment notice.
Nick Tarbet requested clarification on the areas where support is lacking.
Mr. Bunce explained the office, as a workspace, does not benefit from advertisements for festivals,
events, and that there has not been security assistance. He continued that the businesses have had a
difficult time with security, with little help from law enforcement. Situations regarding people without
homes harassing, conducting themselves indecently, and damaging property.
A discussion was held regarding Mr. Bunce’s comments and if they were presented to the correct group.
It was determined that Mr. Bunce’s comments were correctly made to the Board.
Mr. Ferguson made a recommendation for the Board to encourage the property owner visit with the
Alliance to find out what is done for security.
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (CBIA)
Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Jolyn Walz asked if Mr. Bunce had been directed to the Ambassador Program.
Mr. Bunce had not been directed to them in the past; contact information was shared.
Mr. Bunce reiterated his concern regarding the benefits his business would receive from the assessment
and explained that he would like to get the amount of his assessment decreased from $7,000.
A discussion was held regarding the process and how changes are made. Mr. Springmeyer explained that
the Board will meet and provide a report to the Council regarding what they recommend. Mr. Bunce
offered to submit information regarding his concerns. The report to the Council will be sent by the 18th of
January.
There were no further comments.
The Board meeting adjourned at 10 am.
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (CBIA)
Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
Board Member
_______________________________
Board Member
_______________________________
Board Member
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please
refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b).
To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials, please visit Salt Lake City
Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes
hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library, use the links on the right of your screen
within the ‘Document Relationships’ information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials.
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the Board of
Equalization Central Business Improvement District meeting held Tuesday, January 11, 2022.
Brandon Bagley (Jan 21, 2022 14:56 MST)
Brandon Bagley
Nick Tarbet (Jan 25, 2022 16:37 MST)
Chris Norlem (Jan 25, 2022 16:39 MST)
Chris Norlem
Cindy Trishman (Jan 25, 2022 17:06 MST)
CBIA 1-11-2022 Minutes
Final Audit Report 2022-01-26
Created:2022-01-21
By:Thais Stewart (thais.stewart@slcgov.com)
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAsX828VV0rNjDvjVyTLTeHivjLmGHD7a5
"CBIA 1-11-2022 Minutes" History
Document created by Thais Stewart (thais.stewart@slcgov.com)
2022-01-21 - 9:53:14 PM GMT
Document emailed to Brandon Bagley (steven.bagley@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-01-21 - 9:54:18 PM GMT
Email viewed by Brandon Bagley (steven.bagley@slcgov.com)
2022-01-21 - 9:55:53 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Brandon Bagley (steven.bagley@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-01-21 - 9:56:34 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Document emailed to Nick Tarbet (nick.tarbet@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-01-21 - 9:56:36 PM GMT
Email viewed by Nick Tarbet (nick.tarbet@slcgov.com)
2022-01-22 - 1:54:59 AM GMT
Email viewed by Nick Tarbet (nick.tarbet@slcgov.com)
2022-01-25 - 10:48:34 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Nick Tarbet (nick.tarbet@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-01-25 - 11:37:45 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Document emailed to Chris Norlem (chris.norlem@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-01-25 - 11:37:47 PM GMT
Email viewed by Chris Norlem (chris.norlem@slcgov.com)
2022-01-25 - 11:38:40 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Chris Norlem (chris.norlem@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-01-25 - 11:39:40 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Document emailed to Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-01-25 - 11:39:41 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-01-26 - 0:06:50 AM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2022-01-26 - 0:06:50 AM GMT
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (CBIA)
Wednesday, January 12, 2022
12
The Board of Equalization of Salt Lake City, Utah, met on Wednesday, January 12, 2022, in a Hybrid
Meeting format.
The following Board Members were present:
Chris Norlem, Brandon Bagley, Ben Luedtke
Present City Staff:
Joylynn Walz - Economic Development Office Manage, William Wright - Economic Development
Project Manager, Boyd Ferguson - Senior City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Thais
Stewart – Deputy City Recorder Operations
Consultant:
Jonathan Springmeyer - Bonneville Research
Board Member Brandon Bagley conducted the meeting.
The meeting began at 10 am.
Minutes:
Board Members introduced themselves.
LEXI LLC
Parcel #: 15-01-103-013-000 Address: 660 W 100 S
Parcel #: 15-01-103-006-000 Address: 654 W 100 S
Brett Palmer explained that he does not see direct benefits equal to the assessment cost on his property;
adding an inquiry about plans to improve the area that would justify the expense of the assessment.
A discussion was held regarding the location of the business and the lot. No questions were asked. More
information will be presented once a report is provided to the City Council. The Board will be informing
Mr. Palmer of the next actions.
A discussion was held regarding the map of
economic promotion activities. Chris Norlem provided maps such as the CBIA boundary and properties
within the holiday lighting map. The board also discussed the base rates. Clarification regarding the final
assessment levy being determined by the City Council was made, with statements regarding the edges and
border property owners of the designated area. Mr. Springmeyer stated there was desire by the Council to
include the section cited by Mr. Palmer in order to avoid an island of area not included in improvement
evaluations.
Jolynn Walz asked a clarifying question regarding when determinations will be made by the board.
Cindy Lou Trishman explained that the Board’s recommendations will be compiled in a report, with the
plan to discuss the final recommendations at Thursday’s meeting following any public comment.
Board Members discussed the opportunity to visit during the meeting or to complete recommendations
after the public opportunity was concluded on Thursday. The Board resolved (due to varied attendance
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (CBIA)
Wednesday, January 12, 2022
12
and representation) to discuss recommendations on Thursday following public comment to allow the City
Council staff time to discuss collectively the information.
Ben Luedtke asked if there was information available concerning the three-year reauthorization and
what economic promotional activities Mr. Palmer’s property area may benefit from. Discussion of the
board regarding the question included potential benefits including property value, attractive downtown –
drawing in economic opportunity, and other indirect assessment benefits.
There were no further comments.
The Board meeting adjourned at 11 am.
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (CBIA)
Wednesday, January 12, 2022
12
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
Board Member
_______________________________
Board Member
_______________________________
Board Member
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please
refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b).
To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials, please visit Salt Lake City
Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes
hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library, use the links on the right of your screen
within the ‘Document Relationships’ information to listen to the audio or view meeting materi als.
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the Board of
Equalization Central Business Improvement District meeting held Wednesday, January 12, 2022.
Brandon Bagley (Jan 21, 2022 15:18 MST)
Brandon Bagley
Benjamin Luedtke (Jan 24, 2022 13:59 MST)
Chris Norlem (Jan 24, 2022 14:00 MST)
Chris Norlem
Cindy Trishman (Jan 25, 2022 17:08 MST)
CBIA 1-12-2022 Minutes
Final Audit Report 2022-01-26
Created:2022-01-21
By:Thais Stewart (thais.stewart@slcgov.com)
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAwlWpmPMrIV7-IBzh3x_Q9vaIGdE5UWLr
"CBIA 1-12-2022 Minutes" History
Document created by Thais Stewart (thais.stewart@slcgov.com)
2022-01-21 - 9:54:44 PM GMT
Document emailed to Brandon Bagley (steven.bagley@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-01-21 - 9:55:16 PM GMT
Email viewed by Brandon Bagley (steven.bagley@slcgov.com)
2022-01-21 - 10:17:59 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Brandon Bagley (steven.bagley@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-01-21 - 10:18:30 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Document emailed to Benjamin Luedtke (benjamin.luedtke@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-01-21 - 10:18:32 PM GMT
Email viewed by Benjamin Luedtke (benjamin.luedtke@slcgov.com)
2022-01-24 - 8:58:57 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Benjamin Luedtke (benjamin.luedtke@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-01-24 - 8:59:40 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Document emailed to Chris Norlem (chris.norlem@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-01-24 - 8:59:42 PM GMT
Email viewed by Chris Norlem (chris.norlem@slcgov.com)
2022-01-24 - 8:59:58 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Chris Norlem (chris.norlem@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-01-24 - 9:00:38 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Document emailed to Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-01-24 - 9:00:39 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-01-26 - 0:08:50 AM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2022-01-26 - 0:08:50 AM GMT
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (CBIA)
Thursday, January 13, 2022
The Board of Equalization of Salt Lake City, Utah, met on Thursday, January 13, 2022, in a Hybrid
Meeting format.
The following Board Members were present:
Chris Norlem, Brandon Bagley, Ben Luedtke
Present City Staff:
Jolynn Walz - Economic Development Office Manager, William Wright - Economic Development
Project Manager, Boyd Ferguson - Senior City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Thais
Stewart – Deputy City Recorder Operations
Consultant:
Jonathan Springmeyer – Bonneville Research
Board Member Brandon Bagley conducted the meeting.
The meeting began at 1 pm.
Minutes:
Board Members introduced themselves.
A discussion was held regarding the meeting on January 11, 2022. Board Members discussed Bruce
Markosian’s requests.
Chris Norlem commented that documents regarding the information presented by Mr. Markosian were
not presented to the Board, and said a decision cannot be made until the documents are presented.
Jonathan Springmeyer explained that Mr. Markosian is waiting for documentation from the County to
arrive regarding the adjustments.
Board Members discussed the options regarding Mr. Markosian’s request such as: City Council’s
decision to retroactively adjust the assessment, and the City Treasurer’s ability to work with Economic
Development to reduce the assessment.
Mr. Norlem pointed out the assessment information taken from the County was done in July of 2021. If
adjustments were made for 2020 before July for Mr. Markosian, then they will be included in the 2021
assessment.
Mr. Springmeyer clarified that the adjustments would not have been made for the 2021 assessment, due to
the timeline. He explained that the requests made would not impact or be a burden to the budget.
Boyd Ferguson provided an example regarding Exhibit C from 2019, and how no names were included.
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (CBIA)
Thursday, January 13, 2022
Board’s recommendation to the City Council: support the inclusion in the assessment ordinance of the
delegating to the City Treasurer of authority to make housekeeping adjustments as outlined by Mr.
Ferguson.
A discussion was held regarding Andy Tran’s request, related to holiday lighting. The CBD maintenance
group has been aware of the issue, a proposal has been sent to CIP that has not yet been funded. This
project would fall under the general fund. Holiday lighting funding goes to the Downtown Alliance,
which hires a contractor. However, it is up to the City to maintain the outlets and power.
Mr. Ferguson explained that as a legal matter, there cannot be an assessment for more than the benefit
received. He went on to say that since Mr. Tran is not receiving the light benefit, it would not be legal to
continue assessing him for holiday lighting. Mr. Tran is the only one that can receive the adjustment since
he came before the Board, even though there may be other properties without the lighting benefit.
Board’s recommendation to the City Council: removing the holiday lighting assessment for both of Mr.
Tran’s parcels for the three-year period.
A discussion was held regarding Tom Bunce’s comment that his business did not benefit from the
assessment.
Brandon Bagley explained that it was agreed that all commercial businesses would be assessed. He also
stated that businesses may not benefit directly, but the assessment improves the downtown area.
Mr. Ferguson commented that not all properties will benefit from all the items listed as benefits to the
assessment.
Ben Luedtke commented that a distinction must be made between security at events and challenges with
people experiencing homelessness.
Board’s recommendation to the City Council: the assessment was properly executed, and an adjustment
should not be made at this time.
A discussion was held regarding Brett Palmer’s comment that his business did not receive enough
benefits to justify the cost of the assessment.
Mr. Luedtke asked the board what their thoughts were on asking the city council to discuss with the
downtown alliance and provide information to the property owners in west downtown (who haven’t been
in the assessment area as long) regarding the events and benefits of the assessment area. He went on to
say that there isn’t an argument at this time to justify adjusting or reducing the assessment.
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (CBIA)
Thursday, January 13, 2022
Mr. Norlem commented that it would be beneficial to evaluate the area regarding the benefits received
from the assessment. Mr. Bagley agrees that an evaluation of the area is necessary to justify its addition to
the assessment area.
Board’s recommendation to the City Council: further discussions should be held regarding the west
downtown assessment to provide property owners with more information regarding the benefits of the
assessment area.
There were no further comments.
The Board meeting adjourned at 2 pm.
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (CBIA)
Thursday, January 13, 2022
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
Board Member
_______________________________
Board Member
_______________________________
Board Member
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please
refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b).
To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials, please visit Salt Lake City
Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes
hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library, use the links on the right of your screen
within the ‘Document Relationships’ information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials.
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the Board of
Equalization Central Business Improvement District meeting held Thursday, January 13, 2022.
Brandon Bagley (Jan 21, 2022 15:19 MST)
Brandon Bagley
Benjamin Luedtke (Jan 24, 2022 14:38 MST)
Chris Norlem (Jan 24, 2022 14:48 MST)
Chris Norlem
Cindy Trishman (Jan 25, 2022 17:07 MST)
CBIA 1-13-2022 Minutes
Final Audit Report 2022-01-26
Created:2022-01-21
By:Thais Stewart (thais.stewart@slcgov.com)
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAN0_OunJdYeFWyw6NfAJMXS3z6bCb-fcA
"CBIA 1-13-2022 Minutes" History
Document created by Thais Stewart (thais.stewart@slcgov.com)
2022-01-21 - 9:55:39 PM GMT
Document emailed to Brandon Bagley (steven.bagley@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-01-21 - 9:56:31 PM GMT
Email viewed by Brandon Bagley (steven.bagley@slcgov.com)
2022-01-21 - 10:19:07 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Brandon Bagley (steven.bagley@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-01-21 - 10:19:30 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Document emailed to Benjamin Luedtke (benjamin.luedtke@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-01-21 - 10:19:32 PM GMT
Email viewed by Benjamin Luedtke (benjamin.luedtke@slcgov.com)
2022-01-24 - 8:59:49 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Benjamin Luedtke (benjamin.luedtke@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-01-24 - 9:38:27 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Document emailed to Chris Norlem (chris.norlem@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-01-24 - 9:38:29 PM GMT
Email viewed by Chris Norlem (chris.norlem@slcgov.com)
2022-01-24 - 9:48:21 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Chris Norlem (chris.norlem@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-01-24 - 9:48:55 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Document emailed to Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-01-24 - 9:48:56 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-01-26 - 0:07:13 AM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2022-01-26 - 0:07:13 AM GMT
Cindy Trishman (Feb 24, 2022 18:21 MST)
BOE Appeal Memo_COMPLETE
Final Audit Report 2022-02-25
Created:2022-02-25
By:Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com)
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAHjBq1R2HJpATlYpLsN0wTR0Z33NXpfOR
"BOE Appeal Memo_COMPLETE" History
Document created by Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com)
2022-02-25 - 1:17:52 AM GMT
Document e-signed by Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-02-25 - 1:21:11 AM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2022-02-25 - 1:21:11 AM GMT
DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ERIN MENDENHALL
MAYOR
BEN KOLENDAR
DIRECTOR
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
_____________________________ Date Received: ___________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ___________
___________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 2, 2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Ben Kolendar, Director of Economic Development
SUBJECT: Assessment Ordinance for the Central Business Improvement Area – 22 (CBIA-22)
STAFF CONTACT: Ben Kolendar, Director, benjamin.kolendar@slcgov.com
Lorena Riffo Jenson, Deputy Director, lorena.riffojenson@slcgov.com
Jolynn Walz, Executive Manager, jolynn.walz@slcgov.com
William Wright, Project Manager, william.wright@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the City Council adopt the Assessment
Ordinance for the Central Business Improvement Area 2022 (CBIA-22).
BUDGET IMPACT: The CBIA-22 would be funded through Special Assessment. The budget
summary for the City is detailed starting on page 3 under the section “Financial Summary for
CBIA – 22.” Possible changes as recommended by the Board of Equalization have been added in
red.
COORDINATION: Economic Development, Treasurer’s Office, Engineering Division,
Recorder’s Office, City Council’s Office, Attorney’s Office, Board of Equalization, Bonneville
Research Consultant, and Gilmore & Bell (bond counsel).
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Salt Lake City established the Central Business Improvement
Area (CBIA) in 1991 as a mechanism to fund marketing, promotions, advocacy, and other
Lisa Shaffer (Feb 3, 2022 12:12 MST)02/03/2022
02/03/2022
initiatives in Downtown Salt Lake City through a special assessment on property within a
designated area. This approval would re-establish a special assessment on properties within the
same boundaries as 2019 for a three-year period and it breaks out a second assessment for holiday
lighting (same boundaries as 2019, maps attached). This process is the final action by the City
Council to establish the CBIA-22 which would begin on April 22, 2022.
Board of Equalization: As required by law, a Board of Equalization (BOE) for the Assessment
Area was appointed by the City Council on November 16, 2021. The BOE consisted of
representatives from the Salt Lake City Council’s Office, the City Treasurer’s Office, and the City
Engineer’s Office.
The BOE met three times in January 2022, to hear and consider any arguments from individuals or
property owners who claim to be aggrieved. The role of the BOE is to consider all facts and
arguments presented at the hearings and provide recommendations to the City Council.
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS: The Board of Equalization (BOE)
has recommended removing the holiday lighting assessment on two properties, owned by a single
owner, which would reduce the CBIA-22 total revenue by $1,048.78.
The BOE has also recommended possibly reducing the assessment of four (4) other properties,
owned by a single owner, who is in the process of disputing Salt Lake County’s valuation for those
properties. The properties undergoing a valuation dispute are currently being assessed $4,519.87.
The BOE recommends to the City Council that the reduction of the assessments on any of the four
properties only be made after the property owner provides the City with the appropriate
documentation from the County showing the property valuation reductions, and then the requested
assessment adjustments can be made administratively by the City Treasurer’s Office. The numbers
listed in red in the updated budget reflect an unlikely scenario in which the two properties and the
last four properties mentioned above would contribute $0 to the CBIA-22. The City Council can
accept, reject, or modify the BOE’s recommendations.
It is unlikely that the budget will be insufficient, even if all the properties listed above are given a
lower assessment. However, if the budget is insufficient, other funds that may be used to fulfill the
budget include: 1) any surplus remaining in existing accounts, 2) the reserve withheld, and/or; 3)
reduced contractor fees.
Financial Summary for CBIA-22
Revenue for CBIA-22
2021 Updated Taxable Property Valuation $3,635,816,258
Proposed Taxable Value Assessment Rate .00142
Taxable Value Assessment Subtotal $5,140,630
2021 Linear Footage for Holiday Lights $13,870
Proposed Holiday Light Rate per Foot $12.79
Holiday Light Assessment Subtotal $177,378
Total Assessment Revenue $5,318,008
Board of Equalization Recommended Adjustments -$5,569
(maximum possible adjustments)
Total Adjusted Assessment Revenue $5,312,439
(reflects largest possible adjustment)
Budget for CBIA-22
Salt Lake City Expenses
DED Management $ 120,000
Reserve withheld (3%) $ 157,539
Professional and Technical $ 30,000
Legal Fees $ 20,000
Printing $ 5,000
Postage Fees $ 3,000
Contingency $ 18,5000
Salt Lake City Subtotal $ 354,039
RFP Recipient Budget
Economic Development Activities (27%) $ 1,293,000
Marketing and Events (16%) $ 776,000
Administration (24%) $ 1,164,000
Ambassador Program Homeless Services (33%) $ 1,512,000
RFP Recipient Subtotal $ 4,745,000
Total Use of Funds $ 5,099,039
Special Stipulations
Parcels under $20,000 in valuation as well as residential, ecclesiastical, and government-owned
properties are exempt from the assessment, except those whose owners agree in writing to be
assessed. By Utah law, properties that are not included in the initial Notice of Intent cannot be
added later unless the property owner consents. However, properties may be removed from the
CBIA-22 at the City Council’s discretion before assessment. Property owners are assessed the full
amount but may pay the assessment in three (3) annual installments. No more than 30% of the
assessment funds can be spent on administrative expenses.
Remaining Proposed Council Actions:
● March 1, 2022 – The City Council accepts or modifies the BOE recommendations and
adopts or rejects the Assessment Ordinance
Previous Action/discussions by the Council concerning the CBIA-22:
● April 20, 2021 – Informational: Central Business Improvement Area 2022
● July 13, 2021 – Resolution: Intention to Designate Central Business Improvement Area
2022
● July 20, 2021 – Adoption: Resolution of Intention to Designate Central Business
Improvement Area 2022
● November 16, 2021 – The City Council announced the protest tally and determined that it
did not exceeds the protest threshold; City Council adopted the Resolution to Designate the
Assessment Area and appointed the BOE
Attachments:
● BOE Report
● Assessment Ordinance
● Boundary Map
● Holiday Lighting Parcel Map
● CBIA-22 Timeline
REPORT OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA
CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA CBIA 22
Board of Equalization Hearings for Special Assessment Area CBIA 22 were held on January 11, 12, and
13, 2022 at 451 South State Street, Room 326, and online, in accordance with the statute governing
special assessment areas. The Board of Equalization discussed and presented its findings at a meeting
held on January 13, 2022.
Board of Equalization members
City Council Nick Tarbet and Ben Luedtke, Signature: _______________ Signature: ________________
Treasurers Office Brandon Bagley, Signature: _______________
Engineering Chris Norlem, Signature: _______________
Advisory Panel to the Board
CBIA Consultant Jonathan Springmeyer
DED Jolyn Walz and Will Wright
City Attorneys Office Boyd Ferguson
City Recorders Office Cindy Lou Trishman and Thais Stewart
The following are the concerns of property owners regarding the special assessment area, and the
recommendations of the Board of Equalization.
Bruce Markosian
AAM Investments, LTD
Address: 751 W 300 S
Parcel #: 15 02 279 001 0000
Proposed Assessment: (as originally mailed for the BOE)
Rate
Code
Description Method of
Assessment
Cost/Unit Total Quantity Excluded
Quantity
Assessed
Quantity
Estimated
Assessment
1 base rate Value $0.00142 575,300.00 0.00 260,400.00 $816.93
$816.93
Address: 735 W 300 S
Parcel #: 15 02 280 001 0000
Proposed Assessment: (as originally mailed for the BOE)
Rate
Code
Description Method of
Assessment
Cost/Unit Total Quantity Excluded
Quantity
Assessed
Quantity
Estimated
Assessment
1 base rate Value $0.00142 423,300.00 0.00 423,300.00 $601.09
$601.09
Address: 760 W 400 S
Parcel #: 15 02 427 001 0000
Proposed Assessment:(as originally mailed for the BOE)
Rate
Code
Description Method of
Assessment
Cost/Unit Total Quantity Excluded
Quantity
Assessed
Quantity
Estimated
Assessment
1 base rate Value $0.00142 210,600.00 0.00 210,600.00 $299.05
$299.05
Address: 735 W 300 S
Parcel #: 15 02 427 002 0000
Proposed Assessment: (as originally mailed for the BOE)
Rate
Code
Description Method of
Assessment
Cost/Unit Total Quantity Excluded
Quantity
Assessed
Quantity
Estimated
Assessment
1 base rate Value $0.00142 1,973,800.00 0.00 1,973,800.00 $2,802.80
$2,802.80
Property Owner Concerns:
Mr. Markosian is concerned that Salt Lake Countys valuation of his properties are inaccurate and
protested their valuations to the County board of equalization. Mr. Markosian indicated during the BOE
Hearing that he received verbal confirmation from the County that adjustments to the valuation need to
be made. To date, Salt Lake County has yet to finalize any changes in valuation or provide
documentation of any approved changes.
Board of Equalization Recommendation:
Board recommends the assessment was appropriate but that if Salt Lake County changes the property
valuations, the City should consider an adjustment of the assessment if it is practical.
Andy Tran
328 Ventures LLC
Address: 338 S State St.
Parcel #: 16 06 301 041 0000
Proposed Assessment: (as originally mailed for the BOE)
Rate
Code
Description Method of
Assessment
Cost/Unit Total Quantity Excluded
Quantity
Assessed
Quantity
Estimated
Assessment
1 base rate Value $0.00142 260,400.00 0.00 260,400.00 $369.77
2 holiday lighting Linear Footage $12.79 33.00 0.00 33.00 $422.07
$791.84
Address: 328 S State St.
Parcel #: 16 06 301 040 0000
Proposed Assessment: (as originally mailed for the BOE)
Rate
Code
Description Method of
Assessment
Cost/Unit Total Quantity Excluded
Quantity
Assessed
Quantity
Estimated
Assessment
1 base rate Value $0.00142 405,2000.00 0.00 405,2000.00 $575.38
2 holiday lighting Linear Footage $12.79 49.00 0.00 49.00 $626.71
$1202.09
Property Owner Concerns:
Mr. Tran is concerned that his properties are being assessed for holiday lighting and currently and for
the past two years holiday lighting has not been available due to an infrastructure deficiency.
Board of Equalization Recommendation:
The Board was able to determine that indeed these properties have not received holiday lighting the
past two years and recommends that these two properties not be assessed for holiday lighting.
Tom Buntz
SKR Properties
American Towers Highrise
Address: 44 W 300 S
Parcel #: 15 01 283 002 0000
Proposed Assessment: (as originally mailed for the BOE)
Rate
Code
Description Method of
Assessment
Cost/Unit Total Quantity Excluded
Quantity
Assessed
Quantity
Estimated
Assessment
1 base rate Value $0.00142 473,100.00 0.00 473,100.00 $671.80
$671.80
Address: 44 W 300 S
Parcel #: 15 01 283 003 0000
Proposed Assessment: (as originally mailed for the BOE)
Rate
Code
Description Method of
Assessment
Cost/Unit Total Quantity Excluded
Quantity
Assessed
Quantity
Estimated
Assessment
1 base rate Value $0.00142 5,597,500.00 0.00 5,597,500.00 $7,948.45
$7,948.45
Address: 44 W 300 S
Parcel #: 15 01 283 004 0000
Proposed Assessment: (as originally mailed for the BOE)
Rate
Code
Description Method of
Assessment
Cost/Unit Total Quantity Excluded
Quantity
Assessed
Quantity
Estimated
Assessment
1 base rate Value $0.00142 4,669,600.00 0.00 4,669,600.00 $6,630.83
$6,630.83
Property Owner Concerns:
Mr. Buntz is concerned that that his properties do not benefit from economic promotion of the Central
Business District, or if they do, they are proportionately less benefited than other types of property.
Specifically, Mr. Buntz believes that his properties do not benefit from security services from the CBIA.
Board of Equalization Recommendation:
The Board recommends the assessment is appropriate.
Brett Palmer
LEXI, LLC
Address: 100 S 654 W
Parcel: 15 01 103 006 000
Proposed Assessment: (as originally mailed for the BOE)
Rate
Code
Description Method of
Assessment
Cost/Unit Total Quantity Excluded
Quantity
Assessed
Quantity
Estimated
Assessment
1 base rate Value $0.00142 168,900.00 0.00 168,900.00 $239.84
$239.84
Address: 100 S 660 W
Parcel: 15 01 103 013 000
Proposed Assessment: (as originally mailed for the BOE)
Rate
Code
Description Method of
Assessment
Cost/Unit Total Quantity Excluded
Quantity
Assessed
Quantity
Estimated
Assessment
1 base rate Value $0.00142 81,000.00 0.00 81,000.00 $115.02
$115.02
Property Owner Concerns:
Mr. Palmer is concerned that his properties, which are located on the western edge of the assessment
area, and especially the parking lot, do not directly benefit from the assessment, or if they do, it is
proportionately less benefited than properties more centrally located in the Central Business District.
Board of Equalization Recommendation:
The Board recommends the assessment is appropriate. The Board also discussed recommending that
the recipient of the contract for economic promotion services reach out to businesses along the western
edge that was added to the assessment area in 2016 at the suggestion of the City Council, to describe
the services provided in that area.
The Board of Equalization finds that, under Utah Code Section 11 42 403(5):
o each assessed property within the assessment area will be assessed in a manner that
meets the requirements of Utah Code Section 11 42 409; and
o except as provided in Utah Code Subsection 11 42 409(5), no parcel of property on the
assessment list will bear more than its equitable portion of the actual costs that are
reasonable of the improvements benefitting the property in accordance with Utah Code
Section 11 42 409.
A-1
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
Salt Lake City, Utah
March 1, 2022
A regular meeting of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, was held on Tuesday,
March 1, 2022, at 7:00 p.m. [via electronic means] [at the offices of the City Council at
451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah,] at which meeting there were present and
answering to roll call the following members who constituted a quorum:
Dan Dugan Chair
Darin Mano Vice-Chair
Amy Fowler Councilmember
Victoria Petro-Eschler Councilmember
Alejandro Puy Councilmember
Ana Valdemoros Councilmember
Chris Wharton Councilmember
Also present:
Erin Mendenhall Mayor
Katherine Lewis City Attorney
Cindy Lou Trishman City Recorder
Absent:
After the meeting had been duly called to order and after other matters not pertinent
to this ordinance had been discussed, the City Recorder presented to the City Council a
Certificate of Compliance with Open Meeting Law with respect to this March 1, 2022,
meeting, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
The Board of Equalization (the Board) for the Salt Lake City, Utah Central
Business Improvement Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA-22 (the Assessment Area)
presented to the City Council its report and stated that it had reviewed statements,
comments and complaints on each property in the Assessment Area as listed in the minutes
of the hearings of the Board held on January 11, 12 and 13, 2022.
The following Findings, Recommendation and Decision were then presented to the
City Council by the Board:
FINDINGS
It is the finding of the Board that each assessed property within the Assessment
Area will be assessed in a manner that meets the requirements of Section 11-42-409 of the
A-2
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
Assessment Area Act, Title 11, Chapter 42, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the
Act). Furthermore, no parcel of property listed in the assessment list, as adjusted herein,
will bear more than its equitable portion of the actual costs that are reasonable of the
economic promotion activities in the Assessment Area, in accordance with Section 11-42-
409 of the Act.
RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION
It is the decision of the Board that the proposed assessment list, as adjusted by the
modifications shown in Exhibit C, is equitable and that the economic promotion activities
being financed thereby constitute a benefit to the properties to be assessed. The assessment
list is approved subject to the modifications shown on Exhibit C attached hereto.
The Board respectfully recommends that the City Council approve and confirm the
assessment list, as adjusted, and adopt an ordinance levying the assessment set out in the
assessment list, as adjusted.
The City Recorder then noted that the City Council is now convened in this meeting
for the purpose, among other things, of accepting the Findings, Recommendation and
Decision of the Board regarding the proposed assessments to be levied within the
Assessment Area and adopting an Assessment Ordinance (the Ordinance) for the
Assessment Area. The following Ordinance was then introduced in writing, was fully
discussed, and pursuant to motion duly made by Councilmember __________ and
seconded by Councilmember _____________, was adopted by the following vote:
AYE:
NAY:
The Ordinance was then signed by the Chair, presented to and approved by the
Mayor, and recorded by the City Recorder in the official records of Salt Lake City, Utah.
The Ordinance is as follows:
A-3
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
ORDINANCE NO. ___ of 2022
An ordinance confirming the equalized assessment list and levying an
assessment against certain properties in the Salt Lake City, Utah Central
Business Improvement Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA-22 (the
Assessment Area), for the purpose of financing certain economic
promotion activities in the downtown area; establishing the effective date
of the ordinance; and related matters.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH,
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Determination of Costs. All costs and expenses to finance the
proposed activities, which include advertising, marketing, special events, festivals,
transportation, newsletters, publications, banners, Christmas lighting, security, special
projects, housing, town meetings, government policy, cultural promotion, reports, surveys,
homeless services and other promotional activities (the Economic Promotion Activities)
within the Assessment Area, together with related costs, have been determined.
Section 2. Approval of Assessment List; Findings. The City Council (the
Council) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the City), hereby accep ts and adopts the Findings,
Recommendation and Decision of the Board of Equalization. The Council confirms and
adopts the equalized and adjusted assessment list for the Assessment Area, a copy of which
is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference (the Assessment
List). The Council has determined that the Assessment List, as adjusted and equalized, is
just and equitable; that each assessed property within the Assessment Area will be assessed
in a manner that meets the requirements of Section 11-42-409 of the Assessment Area Act,
Title 11, Chapter 42, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the Act); and that no
parcel of property listed in the Assessment List will bear more than its equitable portion of
the actual costs that are reasonable of the Economic Promotion Activities.
The City Treasurer may, in his or her sole discretion, make adjustments to the
Assessment List in the future if the contesting property owner described in Exhibit C
presents to the City Treasurer sufficient evidence to demonstrate that their 2021 taxable
property value has been reduced by Salt Lake County.
Section 3. Levy of Assessments. The Council hereby levies an assessment
upon the real property identified in the Assessment List. The assessments levied upon each
parcel of property therein described shall be in the amount set forth in the Assessment List.
The assessments hereby levied are to promote business, economic, and community
development activities in the central business area of downtown Salt Lake City by
financing the Economic Promotion Activities described herein.
The assessments are hereby levied and assessed upon each of the parcels of real
property described in the Assessment List in accordance with the benefit received from the
Economic Promotion Activities within the Assessment Area. The assessments are levied
upon the parcels of land in the Assessment Area at equal and uniform rates.
A-4
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
Section 4. Cost of Economic Promotion Activities; Amount of Total
Assessments. The total cost of the Economic Promotion Activities in the Assessment Area
is $5,318,008, including allowable related expenses. The amount to be assessed against
property affected or benefited by the Economic Promotion Activities in the Assessment
Area is $5,318,008. These amounts do not exceed in the aggregate the sum of: (a) the total
contract price or prices for the Economic Promotion Activities (which contract has been
duly let to the lowest and best responsible bidder therefor); (b) the acquisition price of
improvements, if any; (c) the reasonable cost of economic promotion activities; (d) the
price of purchasing property, if any; (e) connection fees, if any; (f) the interest on interim
warrants issued against the Assessment Area, if any; and (g) overhead costs not to exceed
fifteen percent (15%) of the sum of (a), (b), (c) and (e).
Section 5. Method and Rate. The assessment is a one-time assessment for a
three-year period on property in the Assessment Area to pay all or a portion of the estimated
costs of the Economic Promotion Activities. The total assessment for the Assessment Area
is levied based upon (i) 2021 taxable property values plus (ii) linear feet on certain
properties with frontage on certain streets for special holiday lights, as set out in the Notice
of Intention to Designate Assessment Area pertaining to the Assessment Area. The
assessment for each property was determined based on costs as set out in Section 4.
Section 6. Payment of Assessments. Assessments shall be payable in full or in
three (3) annual installments (the Assessment Installment or Installments). If payable
in three (3) annual installments, the first Installment will fall due May 6, 2022. The second
and third Installments will fall on the first and second anniversary dates of the first
Installment. If any Installment is not paid by the due date, the unpaid Installment(s) will
accumulate delinquent interest and/or charges in accordance with this Assessment
Ordinance and State law.
Section 7. Default in Payment. If a default occurs in the payment of any
assessment installment when due, the City may (a) declare the delinquent amount to be
immediately due and subject to collection, or (b) accelerate payment of the total unpaid
balance of the assessment and declare the whole of the unpaid principal and interest then
due to be immediately due and payable. Additional interest shall accrue and be paid on all
amounts declared to be delinquent or accelerated and immediately due and payable at the
same rate as is applied to delinquent real property taxes for the year in which the assessment
installment becomes delinquent (the Delinquent Rate). In addition to interest charges at
the Delinquent Rate, costs of collection, including attorneys fees and court costs
(Collection Costs), as determined by the City Treasurer or as required by law, may be
charged and paid on all amounts declared to be delinquent or accelerated and immediately
due and payable. In lieu of accelerating the total assessment balance when one or more
assessment installments become delinquent, the City may elect to bring an action to collect
only the delinquent portion of the assessment plus interest at the Delinquent Rate and
Collection Costs.
Upon any default, the City Treasurer shall give notice in writing of the default to
the owner of the property in default as shown by the last available completed real property
assessment rolls. Notice shall be effective upon deposit of the notice in the U.S. Mail,
A-5
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
postage prepaid, and addressed to the owner as shown on the last equalized assessment
rolls for the City or on the official ownership records of Salt Lake County. The notice shall
provide for a period of thirty (30) days in which the owner shall pay the installments then
due and owing plus costs as determined by the City Treasurer. If the City elects to use the
enforcement remedy involving acceleration, the Notice shall also declare that after the
thirty (30) day period the City shall accelerate the then unpaid balance of the principal of
the assessment to be immediately due and payable together with Collection Costs and
interest on the entire unpaid balance to accrue from the date of delinquency at the
Delinquent Rate. Thereafter, the City may immediately initiate a sale of the property as
provided in Title 59, Chapter 2, Part 13, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, or sell
the property pursuant to Section 11-42-502.1(2) and related pertinent provisions of the Act
in the manner provided for judicial foreclosures, or utilize any other remedy permitted by
law. If at the sale no person or entity shall bid and pay the City the amount due on the
assessment plus interest and costs, the property shall be deemed sold to the City for these
amounts. The City shall be permitted to bid at the sale. So long as the City retains
ownership of the property, it shall pay all delinquent assessment installments and all
assessment installments that become due.
The remedies provided herein for the collection of assessments and the enforcement
of liens shall be deemed and construed to be cumulative and the use of any one method or
means of collection or enforcement shall not deprive the City of the use of any other method
or means. The amounts of accrued interest and all Collection Costs, attorneys fees and
costs shall be added to the amount of the assessment up to, and including, the date of
foreclosure sale.
Section 8. Remedy of Default. If prior to the final date that payment may be
legally made under a final sale or foreclosure of property to collect delinquent assessment
installments, the property owner pays the full amount of all unpaid installments that are
past due and delinquent with interest at the Delinquent Rate, plus all approved or required
costs and attorneys fees, the assessment of said owner shall be restored so that the owner
will have the right to make the payments in installments as if the default had not occurred.
Any payment made to cure a default shall be applied first, to the payment of attorneys fees
and other costs incurred as a result of such default; second, to interest charged on past due
installments, as set forth above; third, to the interest portion of all past due assessments, if
any; and last, to the payment of outstanding principal.
Section 9. Lien of Assessment. Upon the recordation of the required
documents and notices, an assessment or any part or installment of it, any interest accruing,
and the penalties, attorneys fees and costs of collection shall constitute a political
subdivision lien against the property upon which the assessment is levied on the effective
date of this Ordinance. Said lien shall be superior to the lien of any trust deed, mortgage,
mechanics or materialmans lien, or other encumbrance, shall be equal to and on a parity
with the lien for general property taxes, and shall apply without interruption, change of
priority, or alteration in any manner to any reduced payment obligations. The lien shall
continue until the assessment, reduced payment obligations, and any interest, penalties, and
costs on it are paid, notwithstanding any sale of the property for or on account of a
A-6
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
delinquent general property tax, special tax, or other assessment, the issuance of a tax deed,
an assignment of interest by Salt Lake County, or a sheriff's certificate of sale or deed.
Section 10. Contestability. No assessment shall be declared invalid or set aside
in whole or in part in consequence of any error or irregularity that does not go to the equity
or justice of the assessment or proceeding. Any party who has not waived his/her
objections to same as provided by statute may commence a civil action in the district court
with jurisdiction in Salt Lake County against the City to enjoin the levy or collection of the
assessment or to set aside and declare unlawful this Ordinance.
Such action must be commenced and summons must be served on the City not later
than sixty (60) days after the effective date of this Ordinance. This action shall be the
exclusive remedy of any aggrieved party. No court shall entertain any complaint that the
party was authorized to make by statute but did not timely make or any complaint that does
not go to the equity or justice of the assessment or proceeding.
After the expiration of the 60-day period provided in this section:
(a) The assessments levied in the Assessment Area shall become
incontestable as to all persons who have not commenced an action and served a
summons as provided for in this section; and
(b) A suit to enjoin the levy, collection, or enforcement of the
assessment, or to attack or question the legality of the assessment may not be
commenced in this state, and a court may not inquire into those matters.
Section 11. All Necessary Action Approved. The officials of the City are hereby
authorized and directed to take all action necessary and appropriate to effectuate the
provisions of this Ordinance, including the mailing of invoices to property owners in the
Assessment Area.
Section 12. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions. All ordinances or parts thereof in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 13. Posting of Ordinance. Following its approval, this Ordinance shall
be signed by the Mayor and the City Recorder and shall be recorded in the ordinance book
kept for that purpose. Copies of this Ordinance shall be posted in at least three public
places within the Citys boundaries for at least 21 days and a copy of this Ordinance shall
also be posted on the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov) for at least 21 days.
This Ordinance shall take effect on April 21, 2022.
Section 14. Notice of Assessment Interest. The City Recorder is hereby
authorized and directed to file a Notice of Assessment Interest with the Salt Lake County
Recorder within five days of the effective date of this Ordinance. Such Notice shall (1)
state that the City has an assessment interest in the assessed property, (2) state the
maximum number of years over which the assessment will be payable, and (3) describe the
property assessed by legal description and tax identification number.
A-7
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this
March 1, 2022.
(SEAL)
By:_________________________________
Chair
ATTEST:
By:
City Recorder
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
Boyd Ferguson
Senior City Attorney
A-8
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
After the transaction of other business not pertinent to the foregoing matter, the
meeting was on motion duly made, seconded, and carried, adjourned.
(SEAL)
By:_________________________________
Chair
ATTEST:
By:
City Recorder
A-9
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
PRESENTATION TO THE MAYOR
The foregoing ordinance was presented to the Mayor for her approval or
disapproval on this March ___, 2022.
By:_________________________________
Chair
MAYOR'S APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL
The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this March ___, 2022.
____________________________________
Erin Mendenhall
Mayor
A-10
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
STATE OF UTAH )
: ss.
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the duly appointed and qualified City Recorder of Salt Lake
City, Utah, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy
of the record of proceedings had by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, at its meeting
held on March 1, 2022, insofar as the same relates to or concerns the Salt Lake City, Utah
Central Business Improvement Assessment Area No. DA-CBIA-22, as the same appears
of record in my office.
I further certify that the Ordinance levying the assessments was recorded by me in
the official records of Salt Lake City on ___________, 2022.
I further certify that copies of the Ordinance were posted in at least three public
places within the Citys boundaries for at least 21 days and a copy of the Ordinance was
posted on the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov) for at least 21 days.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate
seal of Salt Lake City this ___________, 2022.
(SEAL)
By:
City Recorder
A-11
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW
I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the undersigned City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the
City), do hereby certify, according to the records of the City in my official possession,
and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the requirements of
Section 52-4-202, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, I gave not less than twenty-
four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time, and place of the March 1, 2022,
public meeting held by the City as follows:
(a) [By causing a Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1, to
be posted at the Citys offices at 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, on
_________, 2022, at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the
meeting, said Notice having continuously remained so posted and available for
public inspection until the completion of the meeting;]
(b) By causing a copy of such Notice, in the form attached hereto as
Schedule 1, to be delivered to the Salt Lake Tribune on __________, 2022, at least
twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting; and
(c) By causing a copy of such Notice, in the form attached hereto as
Schedule 1, to be posted on the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov)
at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting.
In addition, the Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting Schedule for the City Council
(attached hereto as Schedule 2) was given specifying the date, time, and place of the regular
meetings of the City Council to be held during the year, by causing said Notice to be (a)
posted on _______________, at the principal office of the City Council, (b) provided to at
least one newspaper of general circulation within the City on ___________, and (c)
published on the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov) during the current
calendar year.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature this
March 1, 2022.
(SEAL)
By:
City Recorder
A-12
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
SCHEDULE 1
NOTICE OF MEETING
A-13
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
SCHEDULE 2
NOTICE OF 2022 ANNUAL MEETING SCHEDULE
B-1
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
EXHIBIT B
ASSESSMENT LIST
(Available for review at the offices of the
City Recorder or City Engineer)
C-1
4879-1584-5896, v. 2
EXHIBIT C
MODIFICATIONS RECOMMENDED
BY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
INTERSTATE 15REGENT STEDISON STRICHARDS STVIN
E
A
L
M
O
N
DQUINCE STALMOND30 0 N
CANYONALAME DA
STANTON
BELD ON
GALE STPACIF ICAVE700 WWASHINGTONLACONIAHOYT PL
QUINCECOTTAGE
STRINGFELLOWGR EGORYWAYNEDELMARPOPLAR A R N O L D
DUBEICHATMANCANYON SIDE LNOR PHEUM ROADSPENCER CTJACK SON AV
EMERIL AVE
ELDER CTPIERP ON T
TEMPLE
PACIF IC AVPACIFIC
600 S MOFFATT CTNORT H TEMPLE
PLUM ALLEYPIERP ON T
MA RKET S T
SHELMERDINEBLAIR STIVERSONCONWAYSOCIAL H ALL
WOODBINEBUTTERWORTHMARGUERITEFLORALPLEASANTTEMPLESOUTH
EAST200EDMONDSARGYLEBLISS CTRENDON CTSEWARD
JACKSON AV
ECCLE S
EXCHANGE PL
GA LL IVAN AVLOMAGRAY EASTHILLSIDE AV CAPITOL STRIO GRANDECTOR CHARD P L
MORTENSENCTWALL50 N
SQUARE SQUARE
LIBRARYWASHINGTON
PIONEER
PARKGATEWAYTHEDANSIE DR
40 0 S400 S
500 S500 S
200 W400 W500 W300 W200 W600 S600 S600 WMAIN ST300 E400 E40 0 S
10 0 S
30 0 S 300 S300 S
200 S MAIN ST300 N
20 0 N
200 E300 E400 E700 W600 W500 W400 W(HWY 89)3RD AVE
B STC STD STA ST1ST AVE
600 W500 W200 N
300 N
(HWY 186 )
30 0 S
200 S
10 0 S
700 WINTERSTATE 15WESTTEMPLESTATE STSTATE STWEST TEMPLE300 W200 W400 WWEST TEMPLESal t La ke CityCBIABoundary Ma p 4
50 51
299
375
80
255
131
222206
324
215
380
220
60
61
128
175
111
7
310 8
136
15
9
132
201
316
77
185
36
120
360
102
75
161
170
15
375
15
307
0
10
248
306
122
311
10
10
110
69
239
335
100
111
175
26
250
311
143
48 334322
341 342
360
79
360
51
185
10
163
150
144
334
320
149
321326
135
160165
75
262
149
330
357
319
155
328
260
163151
145
158156
159
323
155
268
159
338
327 331
225
18
149
124
160
325
122 118
270
120116
315
370
317
30
50
55
50
55
55
30
55
50
50
30
99
50
50
555550
5550
5045
55
50
44
44 44
99
9945
55
45
50
994450 65
505065
515151
51
5050
51
50
50
50
51 65
50
50
51
50
51
50
51 50
21
51
51 50
50 655051
200 S200 S
400 S400 S
300 S300 S 200 E200 E400 W400 W300 W300 W200 W200 W100 S100 SMain St Main St State St State St So u th Templ e St South Te m p le S t West Temple St West Temple St Rio Grande St Rio Grande St Edison St Edison St Regent St Regent St Exc hange Pl E xc h an ge Pl
Pi e r pont Ave Pier po n t Ave Plum Aly Plum Aly Floral St Floral St Soc ial H all Ave Soci al Hall Ave
Gal livan Av e Gal liva n Ave Poplar Ct Poplar Ct Wayne Ct Wayne Ct Moffatt Ct Moffatt Ct Marguerite Ct Marguerite Ct Shelmerdine Ct Shelmerdine Ct 100 S100 S
Pi e rpont Ave Pie r po n t Av e
CBIA 16: Holiday Lighting Parcels (Preliminary)July 29, 2015Salt Lake City Geographic Information Systems OHoliday Lighting Streets Included Parcels
CBIA ‐ 22 Tentative Timeline
Step Action Description Group/Lead Deadlines
1 Consultant Contract Contract with a consultant to provide guidance
throughout process.DED 2/1/21 ‐ 4/30/2021
2 Technical Description of the CBIA
Technical Description of the CBIA provided to
Engineering. Engineering prepares tax roll based on this
data.
Consultant 3/12/2021
3 Develop assessment methodology that conforms to
Assessment Area Act.
Develop assessment methodology concerning
Economic Promotion & Lighting Assessment.DED 3/24/2021
4 Salt Lake County Property Tax Information. Numbers should be available by May 22, 2021. Consultant 5/28/2021
5 Bond Counsel Description & Improvement Review Bond Counsel reviews the description of Improvements
and Areas to be Improved.DED 6/1/2021
6 Resolution of intent to designate. Bond Counsel drafts resolution of Intent to Designate. Bond Counsel 6/15/2021
7 Resolution of Intent to Designate and Justification
transmittal. (Mayor)
Resolution of Intent to Designate and justification
documentation transmitted to Mayor’s Office. DED 6/22/2021
8 Resolution of Intent to Designate and Justification
transmittal. (Council Office)
Resolution of Intent to Designate and justification
documentation transmitted to Council Office. Mayor’s Office 6/29/2021
9 City Council Meeting DED will brief the City Council on CBIA‐22 Information. DED 7/13/2021
10 Property Owner Letter
Property Owner letter includes verbiage of preliminary
estimate, rate, notice of intent to designate, common
question and map finalized.
DED 7/17/2021
11 Tax roll prepared for DED approval. Assess County Data. Engineering 7/17/2021
12 DED approval of tax roll. DED approves county data. DED 7/17/2021
13 City Council Meeting City Council adopts the resolution of Intent to
Designate the assessment area.City Council 7/20/2021
14 Draft/Create Notice of Intent to Designate Letter Engineering 7/22/2021
15 Post Notice of Intent to Designate Post notice of intent to designate in at least three
public places within boundaries of jurisdiction DED 8/16/2021
16 Mail out Notice of Intent to Designate Mail out Notice of Intent to Designate to go out within
10 days of notice posting.
DED sends via State
Mail 8/19/2021
17 Minutes prepared for use at protest hearing Distribute to team SAA. Bond Counsel 8/30/2021
18 City Council Meeting City Council Protest Hearing City Council 9/7/2021
19 Draft Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and
appoint the Board of Equalization (BOE).Bond Counsel 9/14/2021
20
Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and
appoint the Board of Equalization Transmittal (Mayor’s
Office)
Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and
appoint the Board of Equalization Transmited to
Mayor’s Office.
DED 9/21/2021
21 Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and
appoint the Board of Equalization (City Council).
Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and
appoint the Board of Equalization Transmited to the
Council Office.
Mayor’s Office 9/28/2021
22 Publish Notice of Intent to Designate Publish Notice of Intent to Designate on the Utah Public
Notice Website DED 10/4/2021
23 Property Owners Written Protests Filing Deadline Property owners who are protesting the assessment
area. Also, the end of 60‐day written protest period.Engineering 11/8/2021
24 Compile Written Protests.Engineering 11/9/2021
25 RFP: Center Business Improvement Assessment Area
Management Request For Propsal (RFP)
Solisitation to find a vendor to manage the assessment
area once approved. DED 11/9/2022
26 Delivery of Compilation of Protests Compilation of protests sent to City Council. Engineering 11/9/2021
27 Publishing of Written Protests Publishing of Written Protests on City & State public
notice website.DED 11/9/2021
28 City Council Meeting City Council announces the protest tally and if it
exceeds 40% threshold.City Council 11/16/2021
29 City Council Meeting
City Council adopts the Resolution to Designate the
Assessment Area and appoints the Board of
Equalization.
City Council 11/16/2021
30 Recording of the Resolution to Designate the
Assessment Area & Notice of Proposed Assesment
Record Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area
and Notice of Proposed Assessment with Salt Lake
County Recorder, within 15 days of adoption.
Salt Lake City
Recorders 11/16/2021 ‐ 12/1/2021
31 BOE Notice and Dates of BOE Meetings.Finalize Verbiage for BOE notice and dates of BOE
meetings.Bond Counsel 11/24/2021
32 Mailing process for the BOE notice. Begins 2 weeks before mailing date. Engineering 12/3/2021
33 RFP: Center Business Improvement Assessment Area
Management submissions Proposals/submission due from interested vendors DED 12/7/2021
34 Publication of the BOE hearings.
Publication and posting of time and location of the 3
consecutive meetings. Posted in at least 3 public places
at least 20 days, but not more than 35 days from the
first BOE hearings dates. Published on the Utah Public
Notice Website.
DED 12/7/2021
35 Mailing due to Recorder’s Office for review. Due 1 week before mailing date. Engineering 12/10/2021
36 Mailing of preliminary assessment & notice of BOE
hearings
Mailing sent to each property owner and each street
address. DED 12/17/2021
37 BOE hearings 9:00 am to 10:00 am (public meeting). Held on consecutive days by statute.Salt Lake City
Recorders 1/11/2022
38 BOE hearings 10:00 am to 11:00 am (public meeting). Held on consecutive days by statute.Salt Lake City
Recorders 1/12/2022
39 BOE hearings 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm (public meeting). Held on consecutive days by statute.Salt Lake City
Recorders 1/13/2022
40 Finalization of BOE Hearings Finalize the report DED 1/18/2022
41 RFP: Center Business Improvement Assessment Area
Management Selection Selection is made from the proposals submitted DED 1/21/2022
42 BOE Report Completion BOE report completed, signed, and forwarded to City
Council and Bond Counsel.DED 1/21/2022
43 Mailing of BOE Final Report BOE report mailed to objecting property owners. Begins
15 day appeal period. Engineering 1/21/2022
44 Assessment Ordinance Bond Counsel Draft Assessment Ordinance Bond Counsel 1/28/2022
45 Assessment Ordinance Transmittal (Mayor’s Office).Assessment Ordinance transmitted to the Mayor's
Office. DED 2/1/2022
46 Assessment Ordinance Transmittal (Council Office).Assessment Ordinance transmitted to the Council
Office. Mayor’s Office 2/8/2022
47 City Council Meeting City Council accepts or modifies BOE recommendations
and adopts or rejects Assessment Ordinance.City Council 3/1/2022
48 RFP: Center Business Improvement Assessment Area
Management Contract drafting and Execution
Agreement between Salt Lake City and the vendor to
manage the assesment area. DED 3/4/2022
49 Budget or budget amendment submittion for CBIA Submit budget to SLC Finance Department DED 3/17/2022
50 Transfer properties into billing status.Engineering 3/17/2022
51 Assessment Invoices and Billing Mail assessment notices and invoices to Property
Owners by April 5, 2022 the latest.Treasurer 3/18/2022
52 Publication & Posting of the Assessment Ordinance
1. Publication of the Assessment Ordinance on the Utah
Public Notice Website.
2. Post a copy of the Assessment Ordinance in at least
three public places within the jurisdiction boundaries.
For at least 21 days
Bond Council 3/20/2022
53 Certificate of Project Engineer Certificate of Project Engineer Signed by DED DED 3/25/2022
54 Record Notice of Assessment Interest with Salt Lake
County Recorder.
I note that Utah Code 11‐42‐404(4)(b)(iii) requires the
notice of assessment interest to “describe the property
assessed by legal description and tax identification
number.” Metes and Bounds legal description provided
by Recorder’s Office.
Salt Lake City
Recorders 4/21/2022
55 Effective start date of the Assessment Ordinance Must be specified in the Assessment Ordinance DED 4/21/2022
56 Assessment Payments Due Invoice Payments due from property owners [15 days
after effective date of Assessment Ordinance]Treasurer 5/6/2022
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Allison Rowland
Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:February 15, 2022
RE: ORDINANCE: SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS OF LESS THAN 31 DAYS
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will consider a proposal to make identical ordinance changes to two existing sections of City Code.
The objective is to extend the maximum length of a special event permit for park use from 20 to 31 days, but
only in exceptional cases. These permits would be made available only if the Mayor approves any such special
event for a reason identified in writing. Note that although these amendments would affect sections of Code
titled the “Sale of Significant Parcels of Real Property” (Section 2.58.040), and “Removal of Lands from the
Open Space Lands Inventory” (Section 2.90.070), the proposed amendments would make no changes to the
existing processes of sale or removal of open space lands from the City’s inventory.
Advantages and disadvantages to this change, as identified by the Public Lands Department include the
following:
-Park gatherings attract new users, bring regular users back repeatedly and, by increasing positive
activity, reduce negative park uses.
-Special events can also restrict public use of space, generate trash and litter, stress lawns, and damage
park infrastructure.
-The mayor would determine if the public benefit of an event is of great enough value to allow for up to a
ten-day extension as an exception to the usual process.
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed amendments to City code and consider adopting them.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: March 1, 2022
Set Date: March 1, 2022
Public Hearing: n/a
Potential Action: March 22, 2022
Page | 2
POLICY QUESTIONS
Council staff note: Responses were requested from the Administration and the Attorney’s Office on the
following questions. If these are not available before the time of the briefing, Council Members may wish to
ask them then.
1. The transmittal mentions that this ordinance change would also extend the length of special event permits
for other City-owned properties.
a. What kinds of properties would this potentially affect, and in what ways?
For example, could filming for movies or other productions on City-owned
properties (like the City-County Building or in the Foothill Trails Open
Space) extend 31 days?
b. Must those 31 days be consecutive, or could they be strung out over several
months?
c. Is there a renewal process if a permit-holder would like to extend the time
granted?
2.What would be the process for the Council and the public to be informed of a Mayor’s
decision? What would be the recourse should there be concerns about a Mayor’s rationale
for extending a special event permit to 31 days?
PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT
1965 W 500 S
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104
www.slc.gov/parks/
PHONE 801-972-7800
FAX 801-972-7847
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Date Received:
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council:
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 1, 2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Kristin Riker, Director, Public Lands
SUBJECT: Ordinance Amendment – Section 2.58.040 and Section 2.90.070
STAFF CONTACTS: Kristin Riker, Director, Public Lands Department kristin.riker@slcgov.com;
Boyd Ferguson, Attorney, boyd.ferguson@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance Amendment
RECOMMENDATION: Amend Ordinance
BUDGET IMPACT: $0.00
OVERVIEW: Salt Lake City Public Lands is requesting identical ordinance amendments to City Code
Section 2.58.040, relating to the sale of significant parcels of real property, and Section 2.90.070, relating
to the removal of lands from the open space lands inventory.
Proposed changes to these two ordinances would allow special events lasting less than 31 days to occur
on City property with the approval of the Mayor for a reason identified by the Mayor in writing.
Most requests for special event permits are for events in City parks, but special events are also frequently
held on other City-owned property. The proposed ordinance amendments will apply both to parks and to
those other City-owned properties, but this transmittal will focus on parks, though many of its concepts
also apply more broadly.
Special events are a wonderful way to bring together people of all cultures, backgrounds, and income
levels - local residents as well as visitors. Park gatherings attract new users, bring regular users back
repeatedly and, by increasing positive activity, reduce negative park uses.
Although special events bring many benefits to our park visitors and the residents of Salt Lake City, they
can also restrict public use of space, generate trash and litter, stress lawns, and damage park
infrastructure. The ordinance helps protect our public spaces and the access to those spaces. It allows for
only the Mayor to determine if the public benefit of an event is of great enough value to allow for up to a
ten day extension. A park’s programming should strike a balance between the benefits provided by
Lisa Shaffer (Feb 3, 2022 12:51 MST)
02/03/2022
02/03/2022
PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT
1965 W 500 S
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104
www.slc.gov/parks/
PHONE 801-972-7800
FAX 801-972-7847
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
special events and the long-term sustainability of the park. An example may be when the event brings
national or international visitors, attention, and economic value to Salt Lake City.
In the past five years, Salt Lake City received a minimal number of requests (approximately 10) to allow
a special event to occur longer than the current allowed 20 days.
Notes:
Individuals who are available to present to City Council at Work Session:
- Ryen Schlegel, Special Events Permit Manager
- Kristin Riker, Director, Department of Public Lands
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Red Lined Ordinance Section 2.58.040 and Section 2.90.070
B. Clean Ordinance Section 2.58.040 and Section 2.90.070
ATTACHMENT A
Red Lined Ordinance Section 2.58.040 and Section 2.90.070
1
1
2 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
3 No. of 2022
4
5 (Sale of significant parcels of real property and removal of lands from the open space lands
6 inventory)
7
8 An ordinance amending Section 2.58.040 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the sale
9 of significant parcels of real property, and Section 2.90.070 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating
10 to the removal of lands from the open space lands inventory.
11 WHEREAS, the city desires to make certain changes relating to an exemption, for certain
12 special events, from the mandatory procedures of those sections; and
13 WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, desires to amend Section 2.58.040
14 and Section 2.90.070 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to such changes.
15 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah that:
16 SECTION 1. Section 2.58.040 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the sale of
17 significant parcels of real property, is amended as follows:
18 2.58.040: SALE OF SIGNIFICANT PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY; NOTICE AND
19 HEARING:
20
21 A. A significant parcel of real property owned by the City or any significant legal interest
22 therein shall not be sold, traded, leased or otherwise conveyed or encumbered until the City has
23 provided reasonable notice to all interested parties and held at least one public hearing on the
24 proposed conveyance as set forth herein.
25 B. Reasonable notice of the proposed conveyance shall include the following:
26 1. Notice of the proposed conveyance shall be mailed to all abutting property owners.
27 2. Notice of the proposed conveyance shall be delivered to the Office of the City Council,
28 posted in the Office of the City Recorder, delivered to a local media representative, and posted
2
29 on the City's website.
30 C. No significant parcel of City owned real property identified in section 2.58.035, including
31 table 2.58.035C, of this chapter may be conveyed until after a public hearing has been held
32 before one or more of the following as may be applicable: the Planning Commission, the Airport
33 Board, the Public Utilities Advisory Committee, the Golf Enterprise Fund Advisory Board, or
34 the Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board.
35 D. In addition to the public hearing required above, the City Council may also request a
36 public hearing before the conveyance of the property. Any request for a hearing before the City
37 Council must be delivered to the Office of the Mayor no less than fifteen (15) days after delivery
38 of the notice to the Office of the City Council pursuant to subsection B2 of this section. If no
39 request for a hearing is made within that time period, the City Council shall be deemed to have
40 waived any right to request a hearing.
41 If a written call for hearing has been made by the City Council, the Mayor or his or her designee
42 shall attend the hearing to hear and consider comments upon proposals to convey the property
43 specified in the notice. The hearing shall take place before, after or in conjunction with a
44 regularly scheduled City Council meeting, as determined by the Mayor.
45 E. Any notice of a proposed conveyance of a significant parcel of City owned real property
46 shall specify the following:
47 1. A description of the property to be conveyed or encumbered;
48 2. The nature of the proposed conveyance or encumbrance, whether the property is to be
49 sold, traded or encumbered, including the nature of the conveyance if the property is to be sold,
50 or if a trade or lease of property is contemplated, a brief summary of the proposed transaction;
51 3. Persons to whom interests are to be conveyed;
3
52 4. Any consideration tendered;
53 5. The name of the person, department or entity requesting such action;
54 6. The basis upon which the value of the interest has been determined by the City;
55 7. The date, time and location of the public hearing to be held before the Planning
56 Commission, Airport Board, Public Utilities Advisory Committee, Golf Enterprise Fund
57 Advisory Board, or Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board, as
58 applicable. The notice shall further state that interested persons may appear and comment upon
59 the proposal.
60 F. The conveyance or encumbrance of a significant parcel of real property of the City may be
61 finalized:
62 1. By the Mayor, at his/her discretion following notice and any public hearings required by
63 this section; or
64 2. By the Mayor, if the transfer is revocable and the Mayor has determined that an
65 unanticipated combination of facts and conditions of pressing necessity has emerged that
66 requires that action be taken before a City Council hearing. Such conditions shall not be deemed
67 to arise unless it appears that delay from the notice or a City Council hearing would produce:
68 a. Great or irreparable injury to persons seeking the conveyance or encumbrance, with
69 negligible impact upon City interests;
70 b. Serious detriment to the social or economic interest of the community as whole; or
71 3. Substantial economic loss to the City.
72 G. Any decision by the Mayor to forego the City Council hearing provisions of this section
73 shall be made in writing to the City Council, stating the specific reasons upon which the decision
74 was based.
4
75 H. The following shall be exempt from the mandatory procedures of this section:
76 1. The leasing of existing buildings, infrastructure, or facilities;
77 2. Special events lasting (a) less than twenty-one (21) days or (b), with the approval of the
78 Mayor for a reason identified by the Mayor in writing, less than thirty-one (31) days;
79 3. The leasing of recreation areas in accordance with their intended use;
80 4. The selling of burial rights in the Salt Lake City Cemetery; and
81 5. The granting of easements or other rights that service the property, including grants in
82 connection with utilities or safety equipment such as traffic signal poles. Any such easement or
83 use right must be primarily for the benefit of the City. With respect to open space land under
84 chapter 2.90 of this title, such easement or use right may be granted only with the approval of the
85 City's Open Space Lands Manager.
86 SECTION 2. Section 2.90.070 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the removal of
87 lands from the open space lands inventory, is amended as follows:
88 2.90.070: REMOVAL OF LANDS FROM THE OPEN SPACE LANDS INVENTORY:
89
90 A. Open space lands, conservation easements or other interests in open space land placed in the
91 open space lands inventory shall remain in the inventory in perpetuity unless: 1) they are
92 transferred to a qualified public or nonprofit land conservation entity; or 2) a sale, conversion
93 from undeveloped open space land to developed open space land, exchange, or other transfer of
94 the land, conservation easement or other interest in land is approved by the mayor, subsequent to
95 the following mandatory procedures:
96 1. Any proposal to sell or transfer open space land must be in writing, signed by the mayor,
97 and must include a description of the land to be sold or transferred, the purpose of the proposed
98 sale or transfer, the proposed purchaser of the land, the amount of the proposed purchase price,
5
4
99 the anticipated future use of the land, any anticipated change in zoning that would be required to
100 implement that proposed future use, and a statement by the mayor explaining why the proposed
101 sale or transfer of the open space land is in the best interest of the city.
102 2. Holding a public hearing before the mayor and the city council.
103 3. Providing notice of the proposed sale or transfer and the public hearing by:
104 a. Publication of a notice for two (2) successive weeks, beginning at least thirty (30) days
105 in advance of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation in the city, no less than one-
106 fourth (1/ ) page in size, with type no smaller than 18-point, surrounded by a one-fourth inch
107 (1/4") border, in a portion of the newspaper other than where the legal notices and classified
108 advertisements appear, containing the information set forth in the form below;
109 b. Posting two (2) signs measuring at least two feet by three feet (2' x 3') each, on the land
110 proposed for sale or transfer at least thirty (30) days in advance of the hearing, containing the
111 information set forth in the form below; and
112 c. Mailing notice, at least thirty (30) days in advance of the hearing, to all property owners
113 of record within one thousand feet (1,000') of the land proposed for sale or transfer, containing
114 the information set forth in the form below.
115 d. Any notice published, posted or mailed pursuant to this section shall state substantially
116 as follows:
117 NOTICE OF PROPOSED SALE OR TRANSFER OF PUBLICLY OWNED OPEN SPACE
118 LAND
119 The Mayor of Salt Lake City is proposing to sell or transfer certain Open Space Lands
120 owned by Salt Lake City located at [street location] for $[proposed amount of sale] to [proposed
121 buyer] for future use as [proposed future use].
6
122 A public hearing on this proposal will be held before the Mayor and the City Council on
123 [date of hearing] at the Salt Lake City & County Building, 451 South State Street, room 315, Salt
124 Lake City, Utah, at [time of hearing] p.m.
125 Any individual wishing to address this proposal is invited to attend and to express their
126 views to the Mayor and the City Council at that hearing.
127 4. Following the public hearing, the city council may elect to conduct an advisory vote as to
128 the proposed sale or transfer of the open space land.
129 5. No sale or transfer of open space land may occur until at least six (6) months after the
130 conclusion of the public hearing in order to provide an opportunity to explore other alternatives
131 to the proposed sale or transfer of the open space land.
132 B. Any open space lands, conservation easements or other interests in open space land: 1)
133 acquired by the city in partnership with other entities, units of government, or other parties; or 2)
134 received by donation, bequest, devise, or dedication, may only be authorized for sale, conversion
135 from undeveloped open space land to developed open space land, exchange or other transfer if
136 such action is allowed for in the instrument under which the open space land, conservation
137 easement or other interest in open space land was conveyed to, or acquired by, the city.
138 C. The following shall be exempt from the mandatory procedures of this section:
139 1. The leasing of existing buildings, infrastructure, or facilities;
140 2. Special events lasting (a) less than twenty-one (21) days or (b), with the approval of the
141 mayor for a reason identified by the mayor in writing, less than thirty-one (31) days;
142 3. The leasing of recreation areas in accordance with their intended use;
143 4. The selling of burial rights in the Salt Lake City Cemetery.
7
144 5. The granting of easements or other rights that service the property, including grants in
145 connection with utilities or safety equipment such as traffic signal poles. Any such easement or
146 use right must be primarily for the benefit of the city. With respect to open space land under this
147 chapter, such easement or use right may be granted only with the approval of the city's open
148 space lands manager.
149 SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published or
150 posted in accordance with Utah Code section 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah
151 Code section 10-3-713.
152 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of ,
153 2022.
154
155
156
157
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
CHAIRPERSON
158
159 CITY RECORDER
160
161 Transmitted to Mayor on .
162
163 Mayor’s Action: Approved. _ Vetoed.
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
MAYOR
171
172 CITY RECORDER
173
174
175 (SEAL)
176
177
178 Bill No. of 2022.
179 Published: .
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
By:
Boyd Ferguson
Date:
8
180
181
182
183
Clean Ordinance Section 2.58.040 and Section 2.90.070
ATTACHMENT B
1
1
2 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
3 No. of 2022
4
5 (Sale of significant parcels of real property and removal of lands from the open space lands
6 inventory)
7
8 An ordinance amending Section 2.58.040 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the sale
9 of significant parcels of real property, and Section 2.90.070 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating
10 to the removal of lands from the open space lands inventory.
11 WHEREAS, the city desires to make certain changes relating to an exemption, for certain
12 special events, from the mandatory procedures of those sections; and
13 WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, desires to amend Section 2.58.040
14 and Section 2.90.070 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to such changes.
15 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah that:
16 SECTION 1. Section 2.58.040 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the sale of
17 significant parcels of real property, is amended as follows:
18 2.58.040: SALE OF SIGNIFICANT PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY; NOTICE AND
19 HEARING:
20
21 A. A significant parcel of real property owned by the City or any significant legal interest
22 therein shall not be sold, traded, leased or otherwise conveyed or encumbered until the City has
23 provided reasonable notice to all interested parties and held at least one public hearing on the
24 proposed conveyance as set forth herein.
25 B. Reasonable notice of the proposed conveyance shall include the following:
26 1. Notice of the proposed conveyance shall be mailed to all abutting property owners.
27 2. Notice of the proposed conveyance shall be delivered to the Office of the City Council,
28 posted in the Office of the City Recorder, delivered to a local media representative, and posted
2
29 on the City's website.
30 C. No significant parcel of City owned real property identified in section 2.58.035, including
31 table 2.58.035C, of this chapter may be conveyed until after a public hearing has been held
32 before one or more of the following as may be applicable: the Planning Commission, the Airport
33 Board, the Public Utilities Advisory Committee, the Golf Enterprise Fund Advisory Board, or
34 the Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board.
35 D. In addition to the public hearing required above, the City Council may also request a
36 public hearing before the conveyance of the property. Any request for a hearing before the City
37 Council must be delivered to the Office of the Mayor no less than fifteen (15) days after delivery
38 of the notice to the Office of the City Council pursuant to subsection B2 of this section. If no
39 request for a hearing is made within that time period, the City Council shall be deemed to have
40 waived any right to request a hearing.
41 If a written call for hearing has been made by the City Council, the Mayor or his or her designee
42 shall attend the hearing to hear and consider comments upon proposals to convey the property
43 specified in the notice. The hearing shall take place before, after or in conjunction with a
44 regularly scheduled City Council meeting, as determined by the Mayor.
45 E. Any notice of a proposed conveyance of a significant parcel of City owned real property
46 shall specify the following:
47 1. A description of the property to be conveyed or encumbered;
48 2. The nature of the proposed conveyance or encumbrance, whether the property is to be
49 sold, traded or encumbered, including the nature of the conveyance if the property is to be sold,
50 or if a trade or lease of property is contemplated, a brief summary of the proposed transaction;
51 3. Persons to whom interests are to be conveyed;
3
52 4. Any consideration tendered;
53 5. The name of the person, department or entity requesting such action;
54 6. The basis upon which the value of the interest has been determined by the City;
55 7. The date, time and location of the public hearing to be held before the Planning
56 Commission, Airport Board, Public Utilities Advisory Committee, Golf Enterprise Fund
57 Advisory Board, or Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board, as
58 applicable. The notice shall further state that interested persons may appear and comment upon
59 the proposal.
60 F. The conveyance or encumbrance of a significant parcel of real property of the City may be
61 finalized:
62 1. By the Mayor, at his/her discretion following notice and any public hearings required by
63 this section; or
64 2. By the Mayor, if the transfer is revocable and the Mayor has determined that an
65 unanticipated combination of facts and conditions of pressing necessity has emerged that
66 requires that action be taken before a City Council hearing. Such conditions shall not be deemed
67 to arise unless it appears that delay from the notice or a City Council hearing would produce:
68 a. Great or irreparable injury to persons seeking the conveyance or encumbrance, with
69 negligible impact upon City interests;
70 b. Serious detriment to the social or economic interest of the community as whole; or
71 3. Substantial economic loss to the City.
72 G. Any decision by the Mayor to forego the City Council hearing provisions of this section
73 shall be made in writing to the City Council, stating the specific reasons upon which the decision
74 was based.
4
75 H. The following shall be exempt from the mandatory procedures of this section:
76 1. The leasing of existing buildings, infrastructure, or facilities;
77 2. Special events lasting (a) less than twenty-one (21) days or (b), with the approval of the
78 Mayor for a reason identified by the Mayor in writing, less than thirty-one (31) days;
79 3. The leasing of recreation areas in accordance with their intended use;
80 4. The selling of burial rights in the Salt Lake City Cemetery; and
81 5. The granting of easements or other rights that service the property, including grants in
82 connection with utilities or safety equipment such as traffic signal poles. Any such easement or
83 use right must be primarily for the benefit of the City. With respect to open space land under
84 chapter 2.90 of this title, such easement or use right may be granted only with the approval of the
85 City's Open Space Lands Manager.
86 SECTION 2. Section 2.90.070 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the removal of
87 lands from the open space lands inventory, is amended as follows:
88 2.90.070: REMOVAL OF LANDS FROM THE OPEN SPACE LANDS INVENTORY:
89
90 A. Open space lands, conservation easements or other interests in open space land placed in the
91 open space lands inventory shall remain in the inventory in perpetuity unless: 1) they are
92 transferred to a qualified public or nonprofit land conservation entity; or 2) a sale, conversion
93 from undeveloped open space land to developed open space land, exchange, or other transfer of
94 the land, conservation easement or other interest in land is approved by the mayor, subsequent to
95 the following mandatory procedures:
96 1. Any proposal to sell or transfer open space land must be in writing, signed by the mayor,
97 and must include a description of the land to be sold or transferred, the purpose of the proposed
98 sale or transfer, the proposed purchaser of the land, the amount of the proposed purchase price,
5
99 the anticipated future use of the land, any anticipated change in zoning that would be required to
100 implement that proposed future use, and a statement by the mayor explaining why the proposed
101 sale or transfer of the open space land is in the best interest of the city.
102 2. Holding a public hearing before the mayor and the city council.
103 3. Providing notice of the proposed sale or transfer and the public hearing by:
104 a. Publication of a notice for two (2) successive weeks, beginning at least thirty (30) days
105 in advance of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation in the city, no less than one-
106 fourth (1/4) page in size, with type no smaller than 18-point, surrounded by a one-fourth inch
107 (1/4") border, in a portion of the newspaper other than where the legal notices and classified
108 advertisements appear, containing the information set forth in the form below;
109 b. Posting two (2) signs measuring at least two feet by three feet (2' x 3') each, on the land
110 proposed for sale or transfer at least thirty (30) days in advance of the hearing, containing the
111 information set forth in the form below; and
112 c. Mailing notice, at least thirty (30) days in advance of the hearing, to all property owners
113 of record within one thousand feet (1,000') of the land proposed for sale or transfer, containing
114 the information set forth in the form below.
115 d. Any notice published, posted or mailed pursuant to this section shall state substantially
116 as follows:
117 NOTICE OF PROPOSED SALE OR TRANSFER OF PUBLICLY OWNED OPEN SPACE
118 LAND
119 The Mayor of Salt Lake City is proposing to sell or transfer certain Open Space Lands
120 owned by Salt Lake City located at [street location] for $[proposed amount of sale] to [proposed
121 buyer] for future use as [proposed future use].
6
122 A public hearing on this proposal will be held before the Mayor and the City Council on
123 [date of hearing] at the Salt Lake City & County Building, 451 South State Street, room 315, Salt
124 Lake City, Utah, at [time of hearing] p.m.
125 Any individual wishing to address this proposal is invited to attend and to express their
126 views to the Mayor and the City Council at that hearing.
127 4. Following the public hearing, the city council may elect to conduct an advisory vote as to
128 the proposed sale or transfer of the open space land.
129 5. No sale or transfer of open space land may occur until at least six (6) months after the
130 conclusion of the public hearing in order to provide an opportunity to explore other alternatives
131 to the proposed sale or transfer of the open space land.
132 B. Any open space lands, conservation easements or other interests in open space land: 1)
133 acquired by the city in partnership with other entities, units of government, or other parties; or 2)
134 received by donation, bequest, devise, or dedication, may only be authorized for sale, conversion
135 from undeveloped open space land to developed open space land, exchange or other transfer if
136 such action is allowed for in the instrument under which the open space land, conservation
137 easement or other interest in open space land was conveyed to, or acquired by, the city.
138 C. The following shall be exempt from the mandatory procedures of this section:
139 1. The leasing of existing buildings, infrastructure, or facilities;
140 2. Special events lasting (a) less than twenty-one (21) days or (b), with the approval of the
141 mayor for a reason identified by the mayor in writing, less than thirty-one (31) days;
142 3. The leasing of recreation areas in accordance with their intended use;
143 4. The selling of burial rights in the Salt Lake City Cemetery.
7
144 5. The granting of easements or other rights that service the property, including grants in
145 connection with utilities or safety equipment such as traffic signal poles. Any such easement or
146 use right must be primarily for the benefit of the city. With respect to open space land under this
147 chapter, such easement or use right may be granted only with the approval of the city's open
148 space lands manager.
149 SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published or
150 posted in accordance with Utah Code section 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah
151 Code section 10-3-713.
152 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of ,
153 2022.
154
155
156
157
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
CHAIRPERSON
158
159 CITY RECORDER
160
161 Transmitted to Mayor on .
162
163 Mayor’s Action: Approved. _ Vetoed.
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
MAYOR
171
172 CITY RECORDER
173
174
175 (SEAL)
176
177
178 Bill No. of 2022.
179 Published: .
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
By:
Boyd Ferguson
Date: 2-1-22
8
180
181
182
183
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE: March 1, 2022
RE: Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A (2333 West North Temple)
PLNPCM2021-00915
The Council will be briefed about an Administration initiated petition amending the zoning map to remove
property at 2333 West North Temple from the Airport Flight Path Protection (AFPP) Influence Zone A in
Chapter 21A.34.040 Salt Lake City Code. The Airport Inn is currently located on the property and is
operating as a hotel. The proposal’s intent is to allow transitional housing in this extended-stay hotel as
part of the City’s goals related to homelessness.
Hotels and motels are allowed in the TSA-MUEC-C (Transit station Area District Mixed-Use Employment
Center-Core) and within the AFPP Influence Zone A. Under City Code rooms/dwelling units available for
rent or lease for less than 30 days are considered hotels or motels. Lease or rental periods of more than 30
days are typically considered residential use which is not allowed under the AFPP Influence Zone A. The
Department of Airports’ preferred method of addressing this issue is to modify the influence zone
boundary so it does not apply to the subject property. The Council adopted a temporary land use
regulation to allow it to operate an emergency winter overflow shelter in December 2020 (motion
attached). After the winter overflow period, the operator shifted to a hotel model focused on seniors and
veterans.
If adopted by the Council, the operator of the facility would be able to adjust its business model at this
location from a hotel to multi-family housing with stays longer than 30 days. A longer-term goal is to
accept housing vouchers for providing a more stable option for people transitioning out of homelessness.
Such uses are allowed within the TSA-MUEC-C zoning district. Other social services benefitting the
residents are also allowed under the zoning district.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: March 1, 2022
Set Date: March 1, 2022
Public Hearing: March 22, 2022
Potential Action: April 5, 2022
Page | 2
Planning staff found the proposal meets standards, objectives, and policy considerations for zoning map
amendments. They recommended the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to the
City Council with the following condition:
A development agreement shall be recorded on the property that requires any new
development or substantial remodel of existing development to be constructed with air
circulation systems of at least thirty (30) dBs of sound attenuation in sleeping areas and
at least twenty-five (25) dBs of sound attenuation elsewhere.
The recommended sound attenuation is to help mitigate noise from nearby airport operations.
The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal at its December 15, 2021 meeting and held a public
hearing. There were no comments at the hearing and the Commission forwarded a unanimous positive
recommendation to the City Council for the proposal.
Aerial image with Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Overlay shaded red.
Subject property is in the red hashed area.
Image credit: Salt Lake City Department of Airports
Page | 3
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments, determine if the
Council supports moving forward with the proposal.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. The proposed zoning map amendment would “carve out” the subject property creating an irregular
boundary line. Does the Council have concerns with this?
2. Removing the AFPP Influence Zone A overlay from the subject property would permit uses in the
TSA-MUEC-C zoning district listed in Key Consideration 1. Does the Council have concerns with
this?
3. The Council may wish to have a broader policy discussion as it relates to using hotels as transitional
housing for those exiting homelessness.
4. Is the Council supportive of the proposed zoning map amendment?
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Planning staff identified two key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 3-4 of the
Planning Commission staff report. They are summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the
staff report.
Consideration 1-Development Potential
Removing the subject property from the AFPP Influence Zone A would allow any use permitted in the TSA-
MUEC-C zoning district. The zoning map amendment intent is not to allow any other type of residential
use than the transitional housing discussed above, removal of the influence zone overlay would allow
prohibited uses listed below:
• Residential uses (note: single-family detached housing is not allowed in the TSA-MUEC-C zoning
district).
• Commercial uses, except those constructed with air circulation systems and at least twenty-five
(25) dBs of sound attenuation.
• Institutional uses such as schools, hospitals, churches, and rest homes.
• Hotels and motels, except those constructed with air circulation systems and at least thirty (30)
dBs of sound attenuation in sleeping areas and at last twenty-five (25) dBs of sound attenuation
elsewhere.
Planning staff noted some institutional uses are allowed in the TSA-MUEC-C zoning district, but the
location and constraints associated with the zone are barriers to those standalone uses. Removal of the
Influence Zone A allows for onsite community serving uses associated with the Airport Inn such as a
community clinic.
Removal of the Influence Zone A would not impact setbacks or lot coverage, required under the zoning
designation. The base zone standards of the TSA-MUEC-C zoning district would still apply. Planning staff
suggested Influence Zone A sound attenuation requirements on future development as a condition of
approval. As noted above, the Planning Commission included this in its recommendation to the City
Council.
Consideration 2-Compatibility with Adjacent Properties
Adjacent parcels to the east, south and west are zoned TSA-MUEC-C, and across North Temple Street to
the north, parcels have Airport (A) zoning designation as shown in the image below.
Page | 4
Current development is predominantly commercial and light industrial as well as the airport. A large
commercial and research facility with associated parking areas is to the south and east of the subject parcel,
with car rental facilities to the west.
Area zoning map with subject parcel outlined in red
No new buildings are planned as part of the proposed zoning map amendment to remove the subject parcel
from the AFPP Influence Zone A. Existing rooms in the hotel are being remodeled during the transition to
an extended stay motel. Planning staff believes there would be minimal impact to the surrounding
community if the proposal is approved by the Council as occupancy numbers would not change. After
reviewing the proposal, it is Planning staff’s opinion the zoning change to remove the subject parcel from
the AFPP Influence Zone A is appropriate.
ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
Attachment E (pages 11-12) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment
standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are
summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information.
Factor Finding
Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent
with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of
the city as stated through its various adopted planning
documents.
The proposed
amendment is
generally
consistent with the
goals and policies
of applicable
master plans.
Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the
specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance.
The proposal
generally furthers
the specific purpose
statements of the
zoning ordinance.
The extent to which a proposed map amendment will
affect adjacent properties
The change in
zoning is not
Page | 5
anticipated to
create any
substantial new
negative impacts
that wouldn’t be
anticipated with
the current zoning.
Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent
with the purposes and provisions of any applicable
overlay zoning districts which may impose additional
standards.
There is no
applicable overlay
district that
imposes additional
development
standards on this
property.
The adequacy of public facilities and services intended
to serve the subject property, including, but not
limited to, roadways, parks and recreational facilities,
police and fire protection, schools, stormwater
drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and
refuse collection.
The proposal does
not increase the
need for
improvements
beyond that
required by
existing zoning
allowances.
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
• September 2, 2021-Application submitted
• September 28, 2021-Petition assigned to Krissy Gilmore, Senior Planner
• October 5, 2021-Information about petition sent to the Poplar Grove and Jordan Meadows
Community Council Chairs. The Jordan Meadows Community Council sent a letter expressing
concern about a precedent being set to remove other parcels from the influence zone.
• October 5, 2021-Early notification sent to property owners and residents within 300’ of the subject
parcel.
• October 18, 2021-Proposal posted for online open house through November 30, 2021.
• December 3, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing notice emailed to interested parties and
residents/property owners who requested notice. Planning Commission agenda posted to the
Planning Commission website and the State of Utah Public Notice webpage. Public hearing notice
posted on property.
• December 9, 2021-Sent to Planning Commission
• December 15, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing. There were no comments at the public
hearing and the Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City
Council.
• December 20, 2021-Sent to Attorney’s Office
• February 11, 2022-Transmitted to City Council
Item E1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Council Staff
DATE:December 11, 2020
RE:Ordinance: Enacting a Temporary Zoning Regulation to Allow a Temporary Overflow Homeless Shelter
Use at Approximately 2333 West North Temple.
MOTION 1
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance enacting a temporary zoning regulation authorizing an
overflow homeless shelter use at Approximately 2333 West North Temple.
MOTION 2
I move the Council reject the ordinance
Attachment A -
Potential Legislative Intents:
1. It is the Council’s intent to continue working with Salt Lake County and the State of Utah to
address the needs of westside communities and the disproportionate impact that homelessness
has on those areas. We want to make our partners aware that adding a homeless population in
this area, in such close proximity to places where problems currently exist, like the Jordan
River trail and North Temple, makes the challenges this community already faces even harder.
We look forward to help from our partners with mitigation efforts.
2. It is the Council’s intent to request the State and County support for increased investment in
westside neighborhoods generally. For example, County participation in the 9-Line RDA area
that is currently under consideration.
3. It is the Council’s intent to request State and County participation in developing a public
market at the Fairpark to increase access to fresh food on the west side and provide a space for
westside food businesses to grow.
4. It is the intent of the Council to encourage stakeholders to prioritize implementing the
recommendations of the Gardner Policy Institute report on Utah Homeless Services, including
providing sufficient funding to ensure homeless services are funded at the levels needed to
ensure a functioning system to avoid the yearly scramble to have adequate space through the
winter. The council believes that the public and partners need increased clarity about the roles
and responsibilities of the various entities.
5. It is the Council’s intent to ask the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness, the entity
in charge of identifying and providing services, to have a public-facing website clearly sharing
program bed capacity each day and ensuring that service providers and law enforcement have
clear means for referring individuals into emergency shelter. We urge the coalition to provide
increased public education about the link between an adequate number of beds to house
individuals without shelter, and the legal ability of local governments to enforce the no-
camping ordinances that exist in most cities.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 www.slcgov.com
PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174
PLANNING DIVISION
COMMUNITY & NEIGHORHOOD DEVELOPMENT
Staff Report
To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission
From: Krissy Gilmore, 801-535-7780, kristina.gilmore@slcgov.com
Date: December 15, 2021
Re: PLNPCM2021-00915 Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A
Zoning Map Amendment
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2333 W North Temple
PARCEL ID: 08-33-452-004-0000
MASTER PLAN: Airport Master Plan
ZONING DISTRICT: Current – Base zone of TSA-MUEC-C and Airport Flight Path
Protection Zone A Overlay
Proposed – Remove Airport Flight Path Protection Zone A Overlay,
retain base zone of TSA-MUEC-C
REQUEST:
Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a petition to amend the zoning map to remove
the property at 2333 W North Temple from the Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone
A, described under City Code 21A.34.040. The property is currently occupied by a commercial
building, the Airport Inn, and associated parking. The desired result is to allow the Airport Inn
to operate a new model of extended-stay hotels as transitional housing to advance the City’s
overall goals related to homelessness.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the analysis and findings of fact in this staff report, planning staff finds that the zoning
map amendment petition meets the standards, objectives and policy considerations of the city
for a zoning map amendment and recommends that the Planning Commission forward a
positive recommendation to the City Council with the following condition:
1. A development agreement shall be recorded on the property that requires any new
development or substantial remodel of existing development to be constructed with air
circulation systems of at least thirty (30) dBs of sound attenuation in sleeping areas and
at least twenty five (25) dBs of sound attenuation elsewhere.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Proposed Overlay Boundary
B. Memo to Initiate Petition
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
C. Property & Vicinity Photographs
D. City Master Plan Policies
E. Analysis of Standards – Zoning Map Amendment
F. Public Process and Comments
G. Department Review Comments
Petition Description
The proposal includes a zoning map
amendment to remove the property located at
2333 W North Temple from the Airport Flight
Path Protection Influence Zone A, described
under City Code 21A.34.040. The Department
of Airports has been working to accommodate
the development of a new model of transitional
housing for people experiencing homelessness
by working with nonprofit organizations to
refurbish and utilize existing extended-stay
hotels. The petition would update an area of the
Airport Influence Zone to support the
implementation of the city's adopted policies
related to assisting people experiencing homelessness.
The current hotel/motel use is permitted in the TSA-MUEC-C zoning district and within the
Airport Influence Zone A. The longer-term goal is to be able to accept housing vouchers for
transitional housing to provide a more predictable and stable option for those people
transitioning out of homelessness. An extended stay motel is not eligible to accept vouchers.
The preferred path forward indicated by the Department of Airports is to modify the boundary
of the Airport Overlay so that it would not apply to this property. If adopted, the nonprofit will
switch their business model and the hotel will be considered multi-family housing, which is a
permitted use in the TSA-MUEC-C zoning district. It would also allow them to offer other
sorts of social services because most social services that benefit the residents of the facility are
also permitted uses in the TSA zoning district.
The result would allow the Airport Inn to accommodate stays greater than 30 days as
transitional housing. The zoning code does not include a land use that directly matches this
kind of supportive housing, whether permanent, short term, or any time frame in between
those two. Under City Code, units/rooms that are available for rental or lease for periods of
less than one month are considered a hotel/motel, while dwellings that are rented for periods
of longer than one month generally fall into a residential land use and would prohibit the
Airport Inn from operating this model of transitional housing if under the Airport Influence
Zone A.
Applicable Review Processes and Standards
Review Processes: Zoning Map Amendment
Zoning map amendment proposals are reviewed against a set of considerations from the Zoning
Code. The considerations are listed in Attachment E. Planning staff is required by ordinance to
North Temple
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
analyze proposed zoning map amendments against existing adopted City policies and other
related adopted City regulations, as well as consider how a zoning map amendment will affect
adjacent properties. However, ultimately, a decision to amend the zoning map is up to the
discretion of the City Council.
KEY CONSIDERATIONS:
The below considerations were identified through the analysis of the proposal and the zoning
amendment consideration standards:
1. Development Potential
2. Compatibility with Adjacent Properties
Consideration 1: Development Potential
The primary development potential difference is that the map amendment would allow for any
permitted use in the Transit Service Area Mixed Employment Center Core (TSA-MUEC-C)
zoning district. Under current AFPP Influence Zone A, residential uses are incompatible and
prohibited. While the intent of the map amendment is not to allow any other type of residential
use than the transitional housing described earlier in this report and the Department of Airports
has indicated that traditional single-family detached residential uses are not appropriate,
removing the influence zone would allow the prohibited uses from the list below. Of note, single-
family detached residential is not a permitted land use in the TSA-MUEC-C zoning district.
However, the Department of Airports supports removing the small section of Influence Zone A
to meet the city’s goals to provide transitional housing for those experiencing homelessness.
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Prohibited Uses
1. Airport Influence Zone A: The following uses are incompatible in this zone and
are prohibited:
a. Residential uses;
b. Commercial uses, except those constructed with air circulation systems and at
least twenty five (25) dBs of sound attenuation;
c. Institutional uses such as schools, hospitals, churches and rest homes;
d. Hotels and motels, except those constructed with air circulation systems and at
least thirty (30) dBs of sound attenuation in sleeping areas and at least twenty five
(25) dBs of sound attenuation elsewhere.
Some institutional uses are permitted in the TSA-MEUC-C zoning district, but the general
location, zoning constraints, such as the TSA Scorecard, Design Guidelines, parking, setbacks,
and the size of site are barriers to those standalone land uses. The removal of the Influence Zone
A does allow for onsite community serving uses to be associated with the Airport Inn, such as a
community clinic.
No other zoning code changes, such as setbacks or lot coverage, would be impacted by the
removal of the Influence Zone A. The base zone standards of the TSA-MUEC-C zoning district
would still apply. A suggested condition of approval is to include the sound attenuation
requirement of the current Influence Zone A on any future development to limit noise impacts.
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
Consideration 2: Compatibility with Adjacent Properties
As part of a zoning amendment request, staff is
directed to analyze how adjacent properties may be
affected by a change in zoning to the property. In
this case, the property is directly adjacent to
properties zoned TSA-MUEC-C (Transit Service
Area Mixed Employment Center Station Core) to
the east, west, and south and A (Airport) zoning
across the street to the north. All adjacent
properties are within the either Airport Influence
Zone A or B.
The overall development pattern of the area is
dominated by commercial and light industrial uses,
as well as the airport. The surrounding land uses
include a large-scale development and research
building to the west, as well as rental car facilities
to the west. As such, from an aerial photograph
perspective, much of the adjacent land appears to
be dedicated to parking.
The Airport Inn is not planning any new building
associated with the zoning map amendment and
would utilize their current rooms. They are
currently remodeling existing rooms to facilitate
an extended stay model hotel. Therefore, there
should be minimal impact to the surrounding
properties, as the occupancy numbers will not
change. Additionally, other permitted uses would be compatible given the development
potential of the site and condition of approval for sound attenuation.
DISCUSSION:
The proposal has been reviewed against the Zoning Amendment consideration criteria in
Attachment E, including criteria regarding the proposed zoning’s impact and compatibility on
adjacent properties, and compatibility with the associated master plan.
The applicant has proposed a map amendment to the property to remove the Airport Flight Path
Protection Influence Zone A. It is staff’s opinion that the change in zoning for these properties
would not negatively impact the character of the area. As such, staff finds that the requested
zone change is appropriate when considered in the context of the area and is recommending
that the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to the City Council.
NEXT STEPS:
The Planning Commission can provide a positive or negative recommendation for the proposed
map amendment. The recommendation will be sent to the City Council, who will hold a briefing
and additional public hearing on the proposed zoning map amendment. The City Council may
Map showing adjacent base zoning
Map showing adjacent properties
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
make modifications to the proposal and approve or decline to approve the proposed zoning map
amendment.
If the zoning map amendment is approved by the City Council, the property owner could
propose development and/or land uses that meet the standards of the TSA-MUEC-C zoning for
the entire property. If denied, the property owner could continue to operate as an extended stay
motel, but would be prohibited from accepting housing vouchers. The property could also
develop in a manner that meets the existing zoning standards and Influence Zone A.
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
Photo of site
Airport property across the street
Adjacent properties to the west and east
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
Plan Salt Lake Elements and Considerations
Plan Salt Lake (December 2015) outlines an overall vision of sustainable growth and
development in the city. This includes the development of a diverse mix of uses which is
essential to accommodate responsible growth. At the sa me time, compatibility, which is how
new development fits into the scale and character of existing neighborhoods is an important
consideration. New development should be sensitive to the context of surrounding development
while also providing opportunities for new growth.
Guiding Principles outlined in Plan Salt Lake that would relate to the proposed change include
the following:
1) Neighborhoods that provide a safe environment, opportunities for social interaction,
and services needed for the wellbeing of the community therein.
3) Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the City,
providing the basic human need for safety and responding to changing demographics.
11) Ensure access to all City amenities for all citizens while treating everyone equitably
with fairness, justice and respect.
The Housing chapter of Plan Salt Lake includes a number of initiatives intended to help
implement the Plan. The initiative to “Support homeless services” is specifically identified. The
Plan also references “collaboration with community partners…” in terms of access and equity
to City services and amenities.
The proposed change is in concert with the general principles and strategies identified in Plan
Salt Lake.
Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan – 2018-2022 (2017)
Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan – 2018-2022 (the Salt Lake City Housing Plan) was
adopted in late 2017 as the City’s first housing plan since 2000. The Housing Plan is intended
to advance the vision that Salt Lake City is a place for a growing div erse population to find
housing opportunities that are safe, secure, and enrich lives and communities. A big focus of
the Plan is the protection and development of housing opportunities throughout the City , as
well as supporting vulnerable populations. The plan describes the linkages and interaction
between a lack of housing to very low-income renters and the City’s most vulnerable citizens.
This lack of affordable housing can push some citizens into homelessness as they are priced out
of the market.
The Housing Plan was developed using existing housing policy, primarily Plan Salt Lake and the
Salt Lake City Comprehensive Housing Policy. The guiding principles of Plan Salt Lake are
incorporated by reference including the initiative to “Support homeless services”.
The proposed change is in concert with the principles and strategies identified in Growing SLC.
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
21A.50.050: A decision to amend the text of this title or the zoning map by general amendment
is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the city council and is not controlled by any
one standard. In making a decision to amend the zoning map, the City Council should consider
the following:
FACTOR FINDING RATIONALE
1. Whether a proposed
map amendment is
consistent with the
purposes, goals,
objectives, and
policies of the city as
stated through its
various adopted
planning documents;
The proposed
amendment is
generally
consistent with
the goals and
policies of the
applicable
master plans.
Various purposes, goals, objectives, and policies
identified in City documents including Plan Salt
Lake and Growing SLC are consistent with the
proposed changes.
This is further articulated and discussed in the Key
Considerations section of this report.
2. Whether a proposed
map amendment
furthers the specific
purpose statements of
the zoning ordinance.
The proposal
generally
furthers the
specific
purpose
statements of
the zoning
ordinance.
The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to promote
the health, safety, morals, convenience, order,
prosperity and welfare of the present and future
inhabitants of Salt Lake City, to implement the
adopted plans of the city, and, in addition:
A. Lessen congestion in the streets or roads;
B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers;
C. Provide adequate light and air;
D. Classify land uses and distribute land
development and utilization;
E. Protect the tax base;
F. Secure economy in governmental
expenditures;
G. Foster the city's industrial, business and
residential development; and
H. Protect the environment. (Ord. 26-95 § 2(1-
3), 1995)
The proposed zone change to remove the Airport
Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A from the
subject property would support the purposes of the
zoning ordinance found in Chapter 21A.02.0303:
Purpose and Intent as outlined above. It would
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
promote the health, safety and welfare of some of
the City’s most vulnerable residents, those
experiencing homelessness.
It would also help support the purpose statement of
the proposed TSA-MEUC-C zoning district.
3. The extent to which
a proposed map
amendment will affect
adjacent properties;
The change in
zoning is not
anticipated to
create any
substantial
new negative
impacts that
wouldn’t be
anticipated
with the
current zoning.
The proposed adjustment to the Airport Flight Path
Protection Influence Zone A would allow the Airport
Inn to utilizing extended stays as transitional
housing which is not currently allowed by the
overlay zone. The Airport Inn will utilize their
current rooms and is not planning to increase
capacity. The overall scale and allowed uses in the
proposed zone would not be out of scale with the
surrounding TSA zoning. The proposal is not
anticipated to create new negative impacts on
neighboring properties.
4. Whether a
proposed map
amendment is
consistent with the
purposes and
provisions of any
applicable overlay
zoning districts which
may impose additional
standards
There is no
applicable
overlay district
that imposes
additional
development
standards on
this property.
Removing the property from the Airport Flight Path
Protection Influence Zone A is the intent of the map
amendment. The Airport has been involved in the
map amendment process and this project creates no
observed impacts to airport operations.
The subject property is also located within the
Inland Port Overlay Zone. The impacts of the
proposed change are minimal, as hotel and motel
stays are already allowed, and should not conflict
with the Inland Port Overlay Zone.
5. The adequacy of
public facilities and
services intended to
serve the subject
property, including,
but not limited to,
roadways, parks and
recreational facilities,
police and fire
protection, schools,
stormwater drainage
systems, water
supplies, and
wastewater and refuse
collection.
The proposal
does not
increase the
need for
improvements
beyond that
required by
existing zoning
allowances.
The proposal was reviewed by the various city
departments tasked with administering public
facilities and services. The use change of the
property will have minimal impacts, as it will
continue to operate as a hotel, but will allow some
rooms to be used as transitional housing. The
impact to city utilities and services is not anticipated
to change.
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
Public Notice, Meetings, Comments
The following is a list of public meetings that have been held, and other public input
opportunities, related to the proposed project:
• Early notification notices mailed out October 5, 2021
o Notices were mailed to property owners/residents within ~300 feet of the
proposal
o Two inquiries were received regarding more details on the map amendment
request.
o A revised notification was mailed out on November 3, 2021 with an updated
project area map
• The Planning Division provided a 45-day comment period notice to the associated
community councils for the property, Poplar Grove and Jordan Meadows. The
Westpointe Community Council requested that the city attend one of their meetings to
discuss the proposal.
o The Westpointe Community Council provided a letter stating concern that the
proposed map amendment would set a precedence for future map amendments.
o No letter or other input was received from the Poplar Grove or Jordan Meadows
Community Council.
• An online open house was held on the proposal from October 18th to November 30th.
Staff received two comments with concern regarding the proposal. See attached.
Notice of the public hearing for the proposal included:
• Public hearing notice mailed on December 3, 2021
• Public hearing notice posted on December 3, 2020
• Public notice posted on City and State websites and Planning Division list serve on
December 3, 2020
From:Dorothy Owen
To:Gilmore, Kristina
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Comments from Westpointe Community Council regarding: PLNPCM2021-00915 Proposed
amendment to Airport "Influence Zone" as it related to Airport Inn
Date:Tuesday, November 30, 2021 5:24:54 PM
Attachments:Nov 10 Westpointe CC agenda final with rev link.doc
We want to thank you and Brady Fredrickson of the Airport for attending our Nov 10th Community
Council mtg. We are sending you a copy of the agenda and minutes to include in the official file
along with the following comments. Initially, there was concern that the proposed changed
covered an area much larger than just the Airport Inn and that this would allow the development of
apartments and other facilities not compatible with the airport zoning. Furthermore, we were
concerned that such an opening, even if never used, would provide a precedent for further waivers
in other parts of the Airport’s “influence zone.” We have already witnessed the aggressive efforts of
developers of the Misty Rivers residential project to push the bounds of what is appropriate
development adjacent to an airport. Therefore, we were most pleased that others within the City
had expressed similar concerns and that the amendment had been changed to only apply to the
current Airport Inn Building.
It is critical that the final ruling on this matter include specific language clearly explaining the
unique set of circumstances that led up to this change and why this change is NOT a precedent
for other exceptions to the Airport “Influence Zone.” We ask that the final ruling provides
safeguards that protect the airport and the community from a patchwork of future holes in the
“influence zone.” Many cities have suffered this fate and are envious of our success in the past of
protecting the buffer between the community and the airport. Thank you.
Sent from Mail for Windows
From:george chapman
To:Gilmore, Kristina
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Airport Influence Zone decrease should be Citywide not for just one small lot
Date:Monday, November 29, 2021 8:43:49 PM
The other side of the Airport has the International Center which could and should have
housing to decrease the 50,000 plus employees from having to drive far to their residences and
pollute the valley more. Don't worry about the Inland Port. Worry about no housing allowed in
the International Center.
Again the City should not do onesy twosy lot changes of zoning. It should be Citywide. Didn't
Nick Norris once say that?
George Chapman SLC
From:george chapman
To:Gilmore, Kristina; Norris, Nick
Subject:(EXTERNAL) I object to a text amendment for one property in the Airport Influence Zone A
Date:Tuesday, November 2, 2021 11:04:39 AM
I believe that text amendments should be general and citywide (although I reserve the right to
object to further projects). If this property gets the text amendment, others on this side and on
the other side of the Airport, should get to use the text amendment and zoning change to
increase housing near work centers.
George Chapman SLC
The proposal is below:
The proposal includes a text amendment and zoning map amendment to remove a small area
adjacent to 2400 West and south of North Temple from the Airport Influence Zone A,
described under City Code 21A.34.040. The result would allow for residential land uses,
which are not permitted under the overlay zone.
Petition Number: PLNPCM2021-00915
Zoning District: TSA-MUEC-C
Council District: District 1
Staff Planner: Krissy Gilmore
Email: kristina.gilmore@slcgov.com
Phone Number: 385-214-9714
Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone A Map Amendment
Planning Staff Note: As this map amendment does not substantially change the development
potential of the site and no immediate development has been proposed with the application,
City departments, including Building Services, Engineering, Transportation, and Public
Utilities did not provide any concerns with the map amendment.
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 10, 2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: Zoning Map Amendment at approximately 2333 W North Temple Street, Petition
PLNPCM2021-00915
STAFF CONTACT: Krissy Gilmore, Senior Planner, Kristina.Gilmore@slcgov.com, 385-535-
7780
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to amend the zoning map to remove the property at 2333 W North Temple from the
Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District Influence Zone A, described under City Code
21A.34.040.
BUDGET IMPACT: None.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a petition to amend the zoning map to remove
the property at 2333 W North Temple from the Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District
Influence Zone A, described under City Code 21A.34.040. The property is currently occupied by
a commercial building, the Airport Inn, and associated parking. The desired result is to allow the
Airport Inn to operate a new model of extended-stay hotels as transitional housing to advance the
City’s overall goals related to homelessness. For specific information regarding the proposal,
please refer to the Planning Commission Staff Report.
The current hotel/motel use is permitted in the base TSA-MUEC-C zoning district and within the
Airport Influence Zone A. The longer-term goal is to be able to accept housing vouchers for
Lisa Shaffer (Feb 11, 2022 12:03 MST)02/11/2022
02/11/2022
transitional housing to provide a more
predictable and stable option for those people
transitioning out of homelessness. An
extended stay motel is not eligible to accept
vouchers. The preferred path forward indicated
by the Department of Airports is to modify the
boundary of the Airport Overlay so that it
would not apply to this property. If adopted,
the nonprofit will switch their business model
and the hotel will be considered multi-family
housing, which is a permitted use in the TSA-
MUEC-C zoning district. It would also allow
them to offer other sorts of social services
because most social services that benefit the
residents of the facility are also permitted uses
in the TSA zoning district.
The result would allow the Airport Inn to
accommodate stays greater than 30 days as
transitional housing. The zoning code does not
include a land use that directly matches this
kind of supportive housing, whether
permanent, short term, or any time frame in
between those two. Under City Code,
units/rooms that are available for rental or
lease for periods of less than one month are
considered a hotel/motel, while dwellings that
are rented for periods of longer than one
month generally fall into a residential land use
and would prohibit the Airport Inn from
operating this model of transitional housing if
under the Airport Influence Zone A.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
• The Planning Division provided a 45-day comment period notice to the associated
community councils for the property, Poplar Grove and Jordan Meadows. The Westpointe
Community Council requested that the city attend one of their meetings to discuss the
proposal.
o The Westpointe Community Council provided a letter stating concern that the
proposed map amendment would set a precedence for future map amendments.
o No letter or other input was received from the Poplar Grove or Jordan Meadows
Community Council.
• Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property
owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing notice about the proposal and
information on how to give public input on the project on October 5, 2021.
• An online open house was held on the proposal from October 18th to November 30th.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
PC Agenda for December 15, 2021 (Click to Access)
PC Minutes of December 15, 2021 (Click to Access)
PC Staff Report for December 15, 2021 (Click to Access Staff Report)
EXHIBITS
1. Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Hearing
3. Petition Application
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2022
(Amending the zoning map pertaining to a parcel located at
approximately 2333 W North Temple Street to remove the AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection
Overlay District Influence Zone A))
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to parcels located at approximately
2333 W North Temple Street to amend the zoning map to remove the AFPP Airport Flight Path
Protection Overlay District Influence Zone A pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00915.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on December
15, 2021 to consider a request by Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall remove the AFPP
Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District Influence Zone A from the subject parcel
pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00915; and
WHEREAS, at its date meeting, the planning commission voted in favor of forwarding a
positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said application; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that one (1) parcel located at approximately 2333 W North Temple
Street (Parcel ID 08-33-452-004-0000), and as more particularly described on Exhibit “A”
attached hereto, shall be and hereby are rezoned to remove the AFPP Airport Flight Path
Protection Overlay District Influence Zone A from the parcel.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2022.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2022.
Published: ______________.
Ordinance Removing Airport Influence Zone 2333 W North Temple
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney
January 31, 2022
Exhibit “A”
Legal Descriptions of
Parcels to be rezoned to remove the AFPP Zone A
Parcel No. 08-33-452-004-0000
0707 BEG 183 FT E & 523.4 FT N FR S 1/4 COR SEC 33, T 1N, R 1W, S L M; N 0^02'13" W 150 FT;
N 89^58'38" E 294 FT TO CEN OF CANAL; S 0^02'13" E ALG SD CANAL 342.78 FT; S 89^58'38" W
212 FT*
1) CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2021-00915
September 2, 2021 Application for a Zoning Map Amendment.
September 28, 2021 Petition PLNPCM2021-00915 was assigned to Krissy
Gilmore, Senior Planner, for staff analysis and processing.
October 5, 2021 Notice sent to Recognized Community Organizations
informing them of the petition. Early notification of the
project was also sent to property owners and residents
within 300 feet of the proposal.
October 18, 2021 The proposal was posted for an online open house through
November 30, 2021.
December 3, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing notices emailed to
interested parties and residents/property owners who
requested notice. Agenda posted to the Planning
Commission website and the State of Utah Public Notice
webpage.
December 9, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report posted.
December 15, 2021 Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a
positive recommendation to the City Council to approve the
proposed map amendment.
2) NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2021-00915 – Mayor Erin
Mendenhall has initiated a petition to amend the zoning map to remove the property located at
approximately 2333 W North Temple from the Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District
Influence Zone A, described under City Code 21A.34.040. The property is currently occupied by
a commercial building, the Airport Inn, and is zoned TSA-MEUC-C (Transit Station Area Mixed
Employment Center Station Core). The desired result is to allow the Airport Inn to operate a new
model of extended-stay hotels as transitional housing to advance the City's overall housing goals.
Information on this proposal can be found in the staff report prepared for the Planning
Commission accessible from this link -
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/12.%20December/00915.Staff
Report.pdf
As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive
comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider
adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE: Date #1 and Date #2
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: **This meeting will not have a physical location.
**This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation. If you are interested in participating in the Public Hearing, please visit our
website at https://www.slc.gov/council/ to learn how you can share your comments during
the meeting. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at
(801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments
received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Krissy Gilmore at 385-535-7780 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday or via e-mail at Kristina.gilmore@slcgov.com.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours
in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days
in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.
3) PETITION APPLICATION
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV
PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor Erin Mendenhall
Cc: Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Blake Thomas, Department of Community
and Neighborhoods Director; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director; Bill Wyatt,
Executive Director Department of Airports; Brady Fredrickson, Planning Director,
Department of Airports
From: Nick Norris, Planning Director
Date: August 23, 2021
Re: Initiating a zoning amendment to amend the Airport Influence Zone Map.
The Planning Division would like to request that a zoning map amendment be initiated to update an
area of the Airport Influence Zone to support the implementation of the City’s adopted policies
related to assisting people experiencing homelessness. The Department of Airports has been
working with Planning to accommodate the development of a new model of transitional housing for
people experiencing homelessness by working with nonprofit organizations to refurbish and utilize
existing extended-stay hotels. The proposal would include amending the Airport Overlay Map to
remove a limited area from the Airport Influence Zone A. The desired result is to facilitate the
feasibility of sustaining the new model of extended-stay hotels as transitional housing, work within
the existing coordinated-entry program, and create the ability for operators of such extended-stay
hotels the ability to utilize additional funding to advance the City’s overall goals related to
homelessness. The facility will still meet all current sound attenuation requirements.
The process will include an engagement process recommended by Planning and led by the
Department of Airports, which will include the community and other interested parties. The
Planning Division will help coordinate outreach through the city’s Recognized Organizations. After
the proposal is vetted through the engagement process, the proposal will be presented to the
Planning Commission for a public hearing and transmitted to the City Council. The anticipated
timeline is approximately 60 days for the public engagement process and 30 days for the Planning
Commission. The timeline is subject to available workloads of staff participating on the project,
planning commission agenda process, and if any unforeseen issues arise as part of the engagement
process.
The proposal includes a text amendment and zoning map amendment to remove a small area
adjacent to 2400 West and south of North Temple from the Airport Influence Zone A, described
under City Code 21A.34.040 and as depicted in in the maps attached.
This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that is the decided course of action. If
the decided course of action is to not initiate the application, the signature block should remain
l Page 2
blank. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made to not
initiate the petition.
Please contact me at ext. 6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you.
Concurrence to initiate the zoning text and map amendment petition as noted above.
_____________________________________ ______________
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date
09/02/2021
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer, Policy Analyst
DATE:March 1, 2022
RE: STREET VACATION AT 601 SOUTH 900 EAST
(PLNPCM2021-00614)
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will be briefed about a proposal to vacate the public right-of-way between the sidewalk and property
line at 601 South 900 East. The subject parcel is on the southeast corner of 600 South and 900 East. The
property in question is a strip approximately 5.5’ wide which runs along the 120-foot 600 South side, and 50-
foot 900 East side of the parcel (approximately 985 square feet total) as shown in the image below. If approved
by the City Council, the property would be sold to the homeowners at market value (amount TBD). It should be
noted no physical changes to the sidewalk or street are included in this proposal. Pedestrian and vehicular traffic
on the sidewalk and streets would not be impacted if the property is vacated and sold.
Owners of the subject parcel received notice from City Civil Enforcement stating their fence encroaches on the
public right-of-way. Three options were presented to resolve the encroachment:
Remove the fence
Enter a lease with the City for the area
Apply for a vacation of the subject property and purchase if approved by the City Council
The property owners opted to pursue purchasing the property being encroached upon. A wood fence on the
north property line is in poor condition and needs to be replaced. The owners are unable to do so until the
encroachment is resolved.
It is Planning staff’s belief if the proposed street vacation is approved by the Council, vacating the section of
right-of-way would likely create an irregular right-of-way pattern on both block faces. In other words, the subject
property lines would approximately 5.5 feet closer to the sidewalks compared to other properties on the block.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: March 1, 2022
Set Date: March 1, 2022
Public Hearing: March 22, 2022
Potential Action: April 5, 2022
Page | 2
In the department review process, Engineering expressed opposition to the proposed street vacation because
they believe it would not be in the City’s best interest to set a precedent of vacating rights-of-way “to match fence
lines or backs of sidewalk.”
The Planning Commission reviewed this at its December 15, 2021 meeting. The applicant spoke saying he
believes a survey error was made many years ago resulting in the lot lines approximately six feet from the
sidewalk. No one spoke at the Planning Commission public hearing. Planning staff recommended and the
Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council.
Aerial view of subject parcel outlined in red, and encroachment area shaded in yellow.
(Note: map is for informational purposes and is not exact. Property lines and aerial images do not align precisely.)
Image courtesy Salt Lake City Planning Division
Goal of the briefing: To review the proposed street closure, address questions Council Members may
have and prepare for a public hearing.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. The Council may wish to ask the Administration if other properties on the block have similar
encroachments. The Council may also wish to ask planning if this would create an uneven block face
appearance and if that would be counter to general City urban design goals.
2. Is the Council supportive of closing and vacating the subject property?
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Planning staff identified four key considerations during analysis of this proposal. They are summarized below.
Please refer to pages 3-4 of the Administration’s Planning Commission staff report for the full analysis.
Consideration 1-Utah State Code
Section 10-9a-609.5 Utah State Code Annotated (included on pages 4-5 of this report) allows municipal
Page | 3
legislative bodies to vacate streets. The Council must determine good cause exists for the vacation, and neither
public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation. Planning staff found the proposed
vacation would not be detrimental to the public interest, especially since the City would be compensated for the
property.
Consideration 2-City Council Policies
Planning staff found the proposed street vacation meets City Council policies for street vacations discussed in
Consideration 4 below.
Consideration 3-Master Plan Considerations
Planning staff determined the proposed street vacation is not in conflict with the Central Community Master
Plan, Salt Lake City Urban Design Element, or Major Street Plan. They found the proposed street closure does
not have a stated public benefit, but the property is not needed for a public purpose and the City will benefit
from selling the land, the proceeds of which would go to the General Fund.
Consideration 4-Street Design Standards
Planning staff found the proposed street vacation does not violate the City’s street design standards found in
section 20.12 of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance. However, they noted the yet-to-be-adopted update to the
Streets and Intersection Typologies Design Guide may impact future street vacation requests.
Attachment D to the Administration’s Planning Commission staff report (pages 13-14) is an analysis of factors
related to the City’s street closure policy. A summary is provided below. For the complete analysis, please refer
to the Planning Commission staff report.
It is the policy of the City Council to close public streets and sell the underlying property.
The Council does not close streets when the action would deny all access to other
property.
o Finding: The proposed vacation would not deny vehicular or pedestrian access to any adjacent
properties.
The general policy when closing a street is to obtain fair market value for the land,
whether the abutting property is residential, commercial or industrial.
o Finding: The City would give up ownership of this property and obtain fair market value for
the sale of the right-of-way to the abutting property owners.
There should be sufficient public policy reason that justify the sale and/or closure of a
public street and it should be sufficiently demonstrated by the applicant that the sale
and/or closure of the street will accomplish the stated public policy reasons.
o Finding: The proposed right-of-way vacation does not conflict with the Central City Master
Plan but does not result in a direct public benefit as outlined in the Salt Lake City Urban Design
Element. However, the Administration stated the property isn’t needed for a public purpose and
the City would benefit from the land sale, with proceeds going to the General Fund.
The City Council should determine whether the stated public policy reasons outweigh
alternatives to the closure of the street.
o Finding: Alternatives to the requested vacation maintain City ownership of the 985 square foot
portion of public right-of-way and require the applicant to enter into a lease agreement for the
encroachment or relocate the fence and re-landscape the park strip. From a Planning
perspective, staff finds that the right-of-way is wider than what is needed for the relevant street
design standard. Aerial imagery shows that the improvements have encroached unto the public
right-of-way for at least 15 years. The City now has an opportunity to benefit financially from
this occupation.
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
June 11, 2021-Petition submitted.
July 1, 2021-Petition assigned to Aaron Barlow, Principal Planner.
Page | 4
October 7, 2021-notice of the petition and request for review was provided to the East Central
Community Council Chair. The Chair shared the request with the Council and indicated they are in favor
of Planning staff’s recommendation.
October 7, 2021-Letters were mailed to property owners and residents within a 300’ radius of the site.
December 3, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing notices mailed. Notice posted on City and State
websites and emailed to the Planning Division listserv. Public hearing notice posted at the subject
property.
December 8, 2021-Planning staff report sent to Planning Commission.
December 15, 2021-The Planning Commission was briefed on the proposal and a public hearing was
held. No public comments were provided at the hearing and the Commission voted unanimously to
forward a positive recommendation for the proposed street closure.
January 27, 2022-Draft ordinance sent to Attorney’s Office.
February 11, 2022-Transmitted to City Council Office.
STREET CLOSURE PROCESS
Street closure process is dictated by Section 10-9a-609.5 Utah State Code which is included below for reference.
10-9a-609.5. Petition to vacate a public street.
(1)In lieu of vacating some or all of a public street through a plat or amended plat in accordance with
Sections 10-9a-603 through 10-9a-609, a legislative body may approve a petition to vacate a public street in
accordance with this section.
(2)A petition to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement shall include:
(a)the name and address of each owner of record of land that is:
(i)adjacent to the public street or municipal utility easement between the two nearest public street
intersections; or
(ii)accessed exclusively by or within 300 feet of the public street or municipal utility easement;
(b)proof of written notice to operators of utilities located within the bounds of the public street or
municipal utility easement sought to be vacated; and
(c)the signature of each owner under Subsection (2)(a) who consents to the vacation.
(3)If a petition is submitted containing a request to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility
easement, the legislative body shall hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 10-9a-208 and
determine whether:
(a)good cause exists for the vacation; and
(b)the public interest or any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation.
(4)The legislative body may adopt an ordinance granting a petition to vacate some or all of a public street or
municipal utility easement if the legislative body finds that:
(a)good cause exists for the vacation; and
(b)neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation.
(5)If the legislative body adopts an ordinance vacating some or all of a public street or municipal utility
easement, the legislative body shall ensure that one or both of the following is recorded in the office of the
recorder of the county in which the land is located:
(a)a plat reflecting the vacation; or
(b)(i)an ordinance described in Subsection (4); and
(ii)a legal description of the public street to be vacated.
(6)The action of the legislative body vacating some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement that
has been dedicated to public use:
(a)operates to the extent to which it is vacated, upon the effective date of the recorded plat or ordinance, as
a revocation of the acceptance of and the relinquishment of the municipality's fee in the vacated public
street or municipal utility easement; and
(b)may not be construed to impair:
(i)any right-of-way or easement of any lot owner; or
Page | 5
(ii)the rights of any public utility.
(7)(a)A municipality may submit a petition, in accordance with Subsection (2), and initiate and complete a
process to vacate some or all of a public street.
(b)If a municipality submits a petition and initiates a process under Subsection (7)(a):
(i)the legislative body shall hold a public hearing;
(ii)the petition and process may not apply to or affect a public utility easement, except to the extent:
(A)the easement is not a protected utility easement as defined in Section 54-3-27;
(B)the easement is included within the public street; and
(C)the notice to vacate the public street also contains a notice to vacate the easement; and
(iii)a recorded ordinance to vacate a public street has the same legal effect as vacating a public street
through a recorded plat or amended plat.
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING // MARCH 1, 2022
PARTIAL STREET VACATION:601 SOUTH 900 EAST
PLNPCM2021-00614
A request for Salt Lake City to
vacate (give up public ownership)
and sell the portion of public right-
of-way between the subject
property and the sidewalk.
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission provided
a positive recommendation.
REQUEST
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
900 EAST
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
600 SOUTH
Aaron Barlow // Principal Planner
aaron.barlow@slcgov.com
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
Staff Report
To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission
From: Aaron Barlow, Principal Planner, aaron.barlow@slcgov.com, 385-386-2764
Date: December 15, 2021
Re: PLNPCM2021-00614 – Partial Street Vacation at 601 South 900 East
STREET VACATION
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 601 South 900 East
MASTER PLAN: Central Community
ZONING DISTRICT: R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential
COUNCIL DISTRICT: District 4, Analia Valdemoros
REQUEST:
On behalf of the owners of 601 South 900 East, Justin Matkin of Parr Brown Gee & Loveless has
requested Salt Lake City vacate (or give up public ownership of) the 875 square-foot portion of public
right-of-way along 600 South and 900 east that sits between the public sidewalk and the subject
property.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the information in this staff report, Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
forwards a favorable recommendation to the City Council for the request to vacate this portion of right-of-
way adjacent to 601 South 900 East.
ATTACHMENTS:
A.Maps & Illustrations
B.Site Visit Photographs
C.Application Materials
D.Analysis of Standards
E.Public Process and Comments
F.Department Review Comments
1
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Background
According to the letter submitted by the applicant (included with Attachment C), the owners of the subject
property (Michael and Amy Kennedy) received a letter from the Civil Enforcement Division asserting that
the fence in the front yard encroached on the public right-of-way. In that letter, the enforcement official
provided them with three possible options that would resolve the encroachment:
1.Remove the fence,
2.Enter into a lease with the City for the area, or
3.Apply for a vacation of the relevant portion and purchase the encroached area.
The property owners have directed the applicant to pursue the third option and work toward purchasing the
area of encroachment. According to the applicant, the fence in question “has been in place for several years.”
The wood fence along the north property line is currently in disrepair and needs to be replaced. According
to the applicant, the property owners cannot make the necessary repairs until they own the encroachment
area.
Scope of Request
The area in question is an L-shaped strip of public right-of-way between the subject property at 601 South
900 East and the existing public sidewalk. This request would not impact the adjacent sidewalk. The
encroachment area is about five feet wide and runs along the 120-foot long north property line facing 600
South and the 50-foot long property line that faces 900 East (see Attachment A). According to the applicant,
the encroaching fence has been in the same location for over 30 years. Aerial Imagery and Google Street
View both confirm that the fence has been at its current location since at least 2006. If approved by Council,
the abutting property owners would be required to pay fair market value for the land. The Real Estate
Services Division requires that the applicant get an appraisal for the area in question before the sale.
Street Context
600 South
The subject property sits at the corner of 600 South and 900 East. East of 900 East, 600 South is classified
as a Local Street by the Transportation Master Plan’s Major Street Plan (Included with Attachment A). The
right-of-way is approximately 132 feet wide, measured from front property line to front property line—the
street itself (curb to curb) is about 50 feet wide. There are wide park strips with continuous sidewalks on
both sides of the road; both sides are over 30 feet wide. Neither the subject property nor the 600 East right-
of-way is part of a subdivision.
900 East
The Transportation Master Plan’s Major Street Plan classifies 900 East as a City Arterial Street. There are
three lanes of traffic, one in each direction with a center turning lane. The right-of-way is approximately 135
feet wide, measured from property line to property line, while the street itself (curb to curb)is 50 feet wide.
Wide park strips with continuous sidewalks are also a feature of 900 East—there is 45 feet between the
subject property’s front line and the curb. The street is also not part of any subdivision.
Applicable Review Processes and Standards
Review Process: Street Vacation
Street Vacation requests are ultimately up to the City Council’s discretion and are not controlled by any one
standard. If approved by the City Council, the area in question would be vacated, declared surplus property,
and sold to the adjacent property owners for a fair market value.
2
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
KEY CONSIDERATIONS:
The key considerations and concerns below have been identified through the analysis of the project, neighbor
& community input, and department reviews:
1. Utah State Code
2. City Council Policies
3. Master Plan Considerations
4. Street Design Standards
Consideration 1 – Utah State Code
Section 10-9a-609.5 of the Utah Code Annotated establishes the power for cities to vacate streets upon the
request of the governing body or a property owner. The City Council must determine that good cause exists
for the vacation, and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation.
Aerial imagery shows that encroachments consisting of accessory structures and fencing have existed in this
portion of right-of-way since at least 2006. The fence in question has been in place for at least 15 years. Staff
finds that a transfer to private ownership would not be detrimental to the public interest, especially since it
would result in the adjacent property owners compensating the City for the property at market rate.
Consideration 2 – Housing Goals
In 1999, the City Council adopted a street closure policy, which applies to street vacations. A complete
analysis can be found in Attachment D.
Consideration 3 – Master Plan Considerations
The Central Community Master Plan (2005) does not include any specific policies or action items related
to street vacations or the sale of City-owned property to private property owners. Staff finds that the street
vacation request neither supports nor violates any policy or goal found in the Central Community Master
Plan.
The Salt Lake City Urban Design Element (1990) includes a section titled Street as Elements of Open Space,
with a Policy Concept that states, “Decline to vacate streets, alleys, and other public rights-of-way unless it
is demonstrated that the vacation will result in a public benefit.” Though this proposal does not violate public
policies, it does not have a stated public benefit. However, the property isn’t needed for a public purpose,
and the City would benefit financially from the sale of the land—proceeds would be placed in the General
Fund.
The Salt Lake City Transportation Master Plan’s Major Street Plan (2018) designates 900 East as an
Arterial Street. While the master plan does not give specific dimensions, it does describe these streets as
“generally multi-lane streets carrying high traffic volumes at relatively high speeds.” The area in question
sits between the existing sidewalk and the subject property. Vacating it will not impact the stated purpose of
arterial streets.
Consideration 4 – Street Design Standards
Section 20.12 of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance provides design standards for new City streets and
modifications of City streets through vacation or closure. The Street Design standards (found in 20.12.030)
require that streets conform to street and right-of-way cross-section typologies (20.12.030.A.2). These
typologies are found in the Street Design Regulations (included with Attachment A). For arterial streets,
they call for a street section between 84 and 110 feet wide from the outside of the sidewalk on each end, and
for local streets serving single-family residential neighborhoods, they call for a 50-foot-wide street section
(see illustration on the next page). However, the portion of the right-of-way on the property side of a
3
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
sidewalk is not included in the cross-sections.
Therefore, because the encroachment area is not
within the cross-section typology of an arterial street,
it does not violate the City’s street design standards in
section 20.12.130 of the Salt Lake City Subdivision
Ordinance.
The Planning Commission should be aware that the
Transportation Division is currently updating the
Streets and Intersection Typologies Design Guide,
which may impact future street vacation requests.
However, they have not yet been adopted.
DISCUSSION:
Planning Staff has reviewed the proposal against Utah State Code, the City Council policies regarding street
closures (Attachment D), applicable city master plans, and design guidelines. Based on this analysis, Staff
finds that although no public policies would be explicitly accomplished with the requested partial street
vacation, it also would not violate any public policies or design standards. Further, the City will benefit
financially from the property sale to the adjacent property owners.
NEXT STEPS:
Once the Planning Commission has reviewed the request, their recommendation is forwarded to the City
Council for consideration. The City Council has final decision authority regarding street vacations and
closures.
4
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
ATTACHMENT A – MAPS & ILLUSTRATIONS
*Map is for informational use only and is not exact. Property lines and aerial
photography do not line up perfectly. The official Survey can be found in
Attachment C.
*
5
Aerial from Google Earth dated 12/2006
Street View from Google Maps dated 7/2007
6
5'
walk
5
1/2'
5'
walk
4
1/2'
5'
walk
5'
walk
3
1/2'
9'
11'
4'
walk
5
1/2'
5
1/2'
11'
5'
walk
5
1/2'
11'
4'
walk
5
1/2'
5'
walk
11'
4'
walk
4
1/2'
10'
4'
walk
4
1/2'
10'
4'
walk
4
1/2'
10'
4
1/2'
4'
walk
10'
5'
walk
9'
pking3
1/2'pking
5
1/2'
9'
5'
walkmedian3
1/2'
3
1/2'or pkingpking or
9'
or pkingpking or
11'11'
110' R/W
5'
walk
1'
56' R/W
5'
walk
5'
walkpking2
1/2'
8'8'
pking
pkingpking1'
66' R/W
pkingpking
10'10'
4
1/2'
5'
walk
84' R/W
1'10'
50' R/W
Major Arterial
(Continuous Left
Turn Version)
Major Arterial
(Raised Median Version)
Minor Arterial
(No Parking Version)
Minor Arterial
(Parking Version)
Multi-Family Local
Residential Collector
Commercial/Industrial Local
Commercial/Industrial/Bus Collector
Industrial Cul-De-Sac
Local Residential
Multi-Family Cul-De-Sac
Single Family Cul-De-Sac
10'10'
10' 12'
12'16'
12'
12'14'
10'
14'
14'
14'
14'12'
12'
12'
30'
36'
40'
44'
48'
10'
64'
12'
88'
92'
16'
12'
12'
16'
12'
12'
11'
12'
12'12'
12'
11'
14'
12'
10'
12'
11' 11' 10'
12'
Date Revisions
8/12/91 changed layout/assigned #
Section E1.a1Standard
Typical Street & R/W Cross Sections
page 1 of1
of the Division of Transportation
Salt Lake City Community Developmentslctrans.comSaltLakeCityDivisionofTransportati
o
nslctrans.com
Salt Lake C i t y ,Ut ah
7
Closed
Pioneer Landfill
Landfill
City/County
Landfill
Closed
North Temple
Landfill
§¨¦I-15
§¨¦I-80
§¨¦I-80
§¨¦I-215
1000 NLega
cy
H
ighw
a
y
1820 S
700 S7200 W7600 W8000 W700 N
1200 N
1400 N
1700 N
8400 W6600 W500 N
Rail Intermodal Facility (Under Consideration)
µ
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION
349 SOUTH 200 EAST, SUITE 150Approved November 13, 2018
SALT LAKE CITY TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
MAJOR STREET PLAN: ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
Legend
PROPOSED ARTERIAL STREETS
PROPOSED COLLECTOR STREETS
PROPOSED FREEWAY/INTERCHANGE
PROPOSED MOUNTAIN VIEW CORRIDOR OPTION
LOCAL STREETS:Local streets provide direct access to and from abutting property. Local streets are usually one lane
in each direction meant to carry traffic over short distances and at low speeds.
FREEWAYS/EXPRESSWAYS- STATE ROUTESA roadway which typicall has higher speeds, medians, grade separations at all railroads and grade
separations or interchanges at selected crossroads. Freeways are intended to provide high levels
of safety and efficiency in moving high volumes of traffic at high speeds.
COLLECTOR STREETS:Collector streets provide the connection between Arterial and Local streets. Collectors can be Multi-
Lane, but are meant to carry less traffic at lower speeds and for shorter distances than Arterials.
They provide direct access to abutting property and carry a mix of local traffic and commuter traffic
headed for nearby destinations.
ARTERIALS: CITY STREETSArterial Streets facilitate through traffic movement over relatively long distances such as from one end
of the city to the other and from neighborhood to neighborhood. Arterials are generally Multi-Lane
streets carrying high traffic volumes at relatively high speed limits. These are commuter streets and
typically offer controlled access to abutting property.
ARTERIALS: STATE ROUTESThese are State Highways operated and maintained by the Utah Department of Transportation.
Routes typically operate as Arterial streets.
City Limits
Light Rail
Railroad
PROPOSED STATE ROUTES
Note: This street network will be followed if theRail Intermodal Facility is not developed by December 31, 2028.
8
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
ATTACHMENT B – SITE VISIT PHOTOGRAPHS
9
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
10
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
11
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
ATTACHMENT C – APPLICATION MATERIALS
12
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
ATTACHMENT D – ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
Salt Lake City Council Street Closure Policy
In 1999, the City Council adopted a street closure policy that includes the following provisions:
1. It is the policy of the City Council to close public streets and sell the underlying
property. The Council does not close streets when the action would deny all access
to other property.
Analysis: The portion of right-of-way that the applicant has requested the City vacate does not
contain any vehicular or pedestrian right-of-way—it is a strip of land between the sidewalk and
the subject property. The existing fence has been at this location for at least 15 years.
Finding: The proposed vacation would not deny vehicular or pedestrian access to any adjacent
properties.
2. The general policy when closing a street is to obtain fair market value for the land,
whether the abutting property is residential, commercial, or industrial.
Analysis: If approved by the City Council, approximately 875 square feet of right-of-way would
be declared surplus and sold at a fair market value to the property owners.
Finding: The City would give up ownership of this property and obtain fair market value for the
sale of the right-of-way to the abutting property owners.
3. There should be sufficient public policy reasons that justify the sale and/or closure
of a public street and it should be sufficiently demonstrated by the applicant that
the sale and/or closure of the street will accomplish the stated public policy
reasons.
Analysis: As outlined in the ‘Key Considerations’ section above, the Central Community Master
Plan (2005) does not include any specific policy direction for the vacation of City-owned rights-
of-way. Staff finds that this request does not violate this master plan.
The Salt Lake City Urban Design Element (1990) indicates that the City should decline to vacate
rights-of-way unless it results in a public benefit. While there is no apparent direct public benefit,
the City would benefit financially from the property sale to the adjacent property owners.
Finding: The proposed right-of-way vacation does not conflict with the Central City Master
Plan but does not result in a direct public benefit per the Salt Lake City Urban Design Element.
However, the property isn’t needed for a public purpose, and the City would benefit from the
sale of the land, with proceeds going into the General Fund.
4. The City Council should determine whether the stated public policy reasons
outweigh alternatives to the closure of the street.
Analysis: As an alternative to the proposal, the City and property owners could enter into a
lease agreement for the land occupied by the fencing and landscaping. All maintenance of the
subject property would be by the lessee (the adjacent property owners) subject to required
permits for any work. In exchange for the exclusive use of the subject property, the lessee would
be required to pay annual rent based on fair market value.
A second alternative is for the property owners to remove the fencing and landscaping from the
public right-of-way. This would involve relocating the fence so that it is entirely on private
property and landscaping the park strip in a way that complies with the Zoning Ordinance.
13
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
Finding: Alternatives to the requested vacation maintain City ownership of the 875-square-foot
portion of public right-of-way and require the property owners to either enter into a lease
agreement for the encroachment or relocate the fence and re-landscape the park strip. From a
Planning perspective, Staff finds that the right-of-way is wider than what is needed for the
relevant street design standard. Aerial imagery shows that the improvements have encroached
into the public right-of-way for at least 15 years. The City now has an opportunity to benefit
financially from this occupation.
14
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
ATTACHMENT E – PUBLIC PROCESS
Public Notice & Comments:
October 7, 2021 – Notice of the project was provided to the East Central Community Council Chair. The
Chair shared the request with the Council and has indicated that they are in favor of Planning Staff’s
recommendation. Letters were also mailed to property owners and residents within a 300-foot radius of the
site.
December 3, 2021 – Public hearing notices were mailed for the Planning Commission meeting. Notice was
also posted on City & State websites and emailed to the Planning Division listserv.
December 3, 2021 – A public hearing notice sign was posted at the subject property.
At the time that this report was published, Planning Staff has received two comments regarding this
proposal; they are included with this attachment. If any more are submitted after this date, they will be
forwarded to the Commission and included in the public record.
15
1
Barlow, Aaron
From:Mike Egan
Sent:Tuesday, November 2, 2021 4:35 PM
To:Barlow, Aaron
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Street vacation at 601 south
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
Hi,
I received the notice of street vacation at 601 south 900 east slc ut 84102. The applicant property lines on the map are
into my property at 609 south 900 east by at least three to four feet and include part of my front yard, backyard, parking
area and house. This is incorrect. Also this map shows part of my part property as requested area to be vacated. Also
incorrect. There is a fence that runs on the north side of my property at 609 south and the south side of 601. This
should represent the property line since that fence has been there for over 50 years. I want to confirm the approximate
area requested to be vacated is only in front of 601 so 900 east and north of the fence line that runs between 601 and
609 south 900 east making the north/south boundary.
Thanks!
‐‐
Michael Egan
The One Group Utah
Keller Williams SLC
M m m
Each Keller Williams office is an independently owned and operated franchise of Keller Williams
Realty International and is an Equal Opportunity Employer and supports the Fair Housing Act.
All information provided, is obtained from various sources and has not been, and will not be,
verified by broker or MLS. All information should be independently reviewed and verified for
accuracy. WARNING – FRAUDULENT FUNDING INSTRUCTIONS
Online banking fraud is on the rise. If you receive an email containing WIRE TRANSFER
INSTRUCTIONS call your Realtor or the title company who's contact information you know
is reliable immediately to verify the information prior to sending funds.
1
Barlow, Aaron
From:
Sent:Thursday, December 2, 2021 5:47 PM
To:Barlow, Aaron
Subject:(EXTERNAL) 601 s 900 east
i have contacted the housing enforcement to ascertain if too could build a retaining wall like the one locat
ed at the above address. Housing enforcement has indicated i may not
and that this property
is under enforcement and has no knowledge of the above action although i saw it in a previous email.
housing enforcement that noone may build anything on parking strips due to the utility right away etc
what is the story
i own the property directly across the street on the north west corner of 600 south and 900 east
i attempted to scroll through old emails from planning but could not find the notice .
thanks
carolwicks aka blakely summerfield
PLNPCM2021-00614 December 15, 2021
ATTACHMENT F – DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Real Estate Services
The only comment RES has is the fee. Since this process takes a while to complete, we will be selling the
land at current market value at the time of disposition
Public Utilities
Public Utilities has no concerns with vacating the 875-square-foot area described in this staff report.
Fire/Building (James McCormack at james.mccormack@slcgov.com or 801-535-76605)
No comments received.
Transportation (Michael Barry at michael.barry@slcgov.com or 801-535-7147)
No comments received.
Engineering
Engineering opposes the vacation of public rights-of-way.
16
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 10, 2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: PLNPCM2021-00614 – Street Vacation at 601 South 900 East
STAFF CONTACT: Aaron Barlow, Principal Planner
aaron.barlow@slcgov.com or 801-535-6182
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve the ordinance to Vacate the described portion of public street that sits in front of the
property located at approximately 601 South 900 East.
BUDGET IMPACT: If the ordinance is approved, the area in question would be sold to the
applicant at fair-market value, negotiated by the Real Estate Services Division.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
On behalf of the owners of 601 South 900 East, Justin Matkin of Parr Brown Gee & Loveless has
submitted a request for Salt Lake City to vacate (or give up public ownership of) an approximately
875 square-foot portion of public right-of-way along 600 South and 900 east that sits between the
public sidewalk and the subject property.
The area in question is an L-shaped strip of public right-of-way between the property at 601 South
900 East and the existing public sidewalk. This request would not impact the adjacent sidewalk.
The encroachment area is about five and a half feet wide and runs along the 120-foot-long north
property line facing 600 South and the 50-foot-long property line that faces 900 East. According
to the letter submitted by the applicant (included with staff’s report to the Planning Commission),
the owners of the subject property (Michael and Amy Kennedy) received a letter from the Civil
Enforcement Division asserting that the fence in the front yard encroached on the public right-of-
Lisa Shaffer (Feb 11, 2022 12:03 MST)02/11/2022
02/11/2022
Page 2 of 3
way. In that letter, the enforcement official provided them with three possible options that would
resolve the encroachment:
1. Remove the fence,
2. Enter into a lease with the City for the area, or
3. Apply for a vacation of the relevant portion and purchase the encroached area.
The property owners have directed the applicant to pursue the third option and work toward
purchasing the area of encroachment. According to the applicant, the fence in question “has been
in place for several years.” The wood fence along the north property line is currently in disrepair
and needs to be replaced. According to the applicant, the property owners cannot make the
necessary repairs until they own the encroachment area.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 15, 2021, and voted unanimously
to send a favorable recommendation to the City Council regarding this request. Street Vacations
are ultimately up to the City Council’s discretion and are not controlled by any single standard.
However, in 1999, the City Council adopted a street closure policy that staff and the Planning
Commission considered when determining their recommendations. If the City Council approves
this Street Vacation petition, the area in question would be vacated, declared surplus property, and
sold to the adjacent property owners for a fair market value.
Page 3 of 3
PUBLIC PROCESS:
• Staff sent an early notification of the project to all residents and property owners located
within 300 feet of 601 South 900 East on October 7, 2021.
• Notice was also sent to the East Central Community Council Chair on October 7, 2021. Staff
did not receive an official letter, but the Chair indicated via phone that the Community Council
was supportive of Staff’s recommendation.
• Staff received three public comments. Two are included with staff’s report for the Planning
Commission. The other was received after the report was published and is included with
Exhibit 5.
• A public hearing notice was posted on City & State websites and mailed to all residents and
property owners on December 3, 2021.
• A notice sign for the public hearing was also posted at 601 South 900 East on December 3,
2021.
• The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing for this request on December 15, 2021. By
a vote of 7-0, they forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed
Partial Street Vacation.
PLANNING COMMISSION (PC) RECORDS
a) PC Agenda of December 15, 2021 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes of December 15, 2021 (Click to Access)
c) Planning Commission Staff Report of December 15, 2021 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1) Project Chronology
2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3) Original Petition
4) Comments not included with PC Staff Report
5) Mailing List
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ________ of 20___
(Partial street vacation of the public right-of-way on
600 South and 900 East adjacent to the property located at 601 South 900 East)
An ordinance partially vacating the public right of way on 600 South Street and on 900
East Street adjacent to the corner property located at 601 South 900 East pursuant to Petition No.
PLNPCM2021-00614.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on December
15, 2021, to consider a request made by Justin P. Matkins (the “Applicant”) (Petition No.
PLNPCM2021-00413) on behalf of the adjacent parcel property owners, Michael P. and Amy
Kennedy (the “Owners”), to partially vacate a portion of 600 South Street and a portion of 900
East Street where they border the Owners’ property located at 601 South 900 East; and
WHEREAS, at its December 15, 2021, hearing, the planning commission voted in favor
of forwarding a positive recommendation on said petition to the Salt Lake City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council (the “city council”) held a legally notified public
hearing as per section 10-9a-208 of the Utah Code on _____________;
WHEREAS, the city council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter, that the
city’s interest in the portion of city-owned public right-of-way more particularly described on
“Exhibit A,” attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is not presently necessary for use by
the public.
WHEREAS, the city council finds that there is good cause for the vacation of the alley
and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the proposed
vacation; and
WHEREAS, the city council finds that the vacation of the alley upon the conditions set
forth herein are in the best interest of Salt Lake City.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Vacating City-Owned Right-of-Way. That a portion of 600 South Street
and a portion of 900 East Street adjacent to the property located at 601 South 900 East, which is
the subject of Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00614, and which is more particularly described in
Exhibit “A” attached hereto, hereby is, vacated.
SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The vacation is expressly made subject to
all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now
located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry
thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities,
including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing
rights-of-way or easements of private third parties.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this ________ day of ___________, 20___.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 20___
Published: ______________.
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal description of property to be vacated on 600 South Street and on 900 East Street adjacent
to a corner property located at 601 South 900 East:
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 5,
TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 EAST, SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 5, PLAT B, SALT LAKE
CITY SURVEY SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 0°01’05” EAST 68.36 FEET AND EAST 69.89
FEET FROM A STREET MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF 600 SOUTH STREET
AND 900 EAST STREET AND RUNNING;
THENCE SOUTH 0°00’56” EAST 48.30 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF 900
EAST STREET TO AN EXISTING EAST/WEST FENCE LINE;
THENCE SOUTH 89°46’24” WEST 5.86 FEET ALONG SAID EAST/WEST FENCE
LINE TO AN EXISTING NORTH/SOUTH FENCE LINE;
THENCE NORTH 0°07’26” WEST 22.91 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH/SOUTH
FENCE LINE;
THENCE NORTH 0°53’24” EAST 30.77 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH/SOUTH
FENCE LINE TO AN EXISTING EASTERLY RUNNING FENCE LINE;
THENCE NORTH 89°48’08” EAST 127.42 FEET ALONG AND BEYOND SAID
EASTERLY RUNNING FENCE LINE;
THENCE SOUTH 0°00’56” EAST 5.71 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF 600 SOUTH
STREET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°57’31” WEST 122.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID 600 SOUTH STREET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 985 SQUARE FEET. 0.023 ACRES.
THENCE N00⁰10’33”E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF BLOCK 2 A DISTANCE OF 11.00
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 0.18 ACRES.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Hannah Vickery, Senior City Attorney
2/3/2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
3. ORIGINAL PETITION
4. COMMENTS NOT INCLUDED WITH PC STAFF REPORT
5. MAILING LIST
1. CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2021-00614 – Street Vacation at 601 South 900 East
June 11, 2021 Petition for Alley Vacation received by the Planning Division.
July 1, 2021 Petition assigned to Aaron Barlow, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing.
October 8, 2021 Notice of the project and request for comments sent to the Chairs of the East Liberty
Neighborhood Organization and the Wasatch Hollow Community Council. Notice was
also sent to owners and occupants of properties within 300 feet of the project.
December 2, 2021 Public Hearing Notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning
listserv for the July 28, 2021, Planning Commission meeting. Public hearing notice
mailed to owners and tenants of property within 300 feet of the alley.
December 3, 2021 Public hearing notice sign with project information posted at the right-of-way in front of
601 South 900 East.
December 15, 2021 Planning Commission reviewed the petition and conducted a public hearing. The
Commission then voted to send a positive recommendation to the City Council.
2. HEARING NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2021-00614 – Street
Vacation at 601 South 900 East – On behalf of the owners of 601 South 900 East,
Justin Matkin of Parr Brown Gee & Loveless has requested Salt Lake City vacate (or give
up public ownership of) the 875 square-foot portion of public right-of-way along 600
South and 900 east that sits between the public sidewalk and the subject property. The
adjacent property is located within the R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District
and is within Council District 4, represented by Analia Valdemoros. (Staff contact: Aaron
Barlow at 801-535-6182 or aaron.barlow@slcgov.com).
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive
comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be
held:
DATE:
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b). Please visit slc.gov/council/news/featured-
news/virtually-attend-city-council-meetings-2/ to learn how you can share
your comments live during electronic City Council meetings. If you would like
to provide feedback or comments via email or phone, please contact us
through our 24-hour comment line at 801-535-7654 or by email at
council.comments@slcgov.com.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please
call Aaron Barlow at 801-535-6182 between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday or via e-mail at aaron.barlow@slcgov.com.
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make
requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats,
interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two
business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535- 7600, or relay service 711.
3. ORIGINAL PETITION
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
1
Barlow, Aaron
From:
Sent:Thursday, December 2, 2021 5:47 PM
To:Barlow, Aaron
Subject:(EXTERNAL) 601 s 900 east
i have contacted the housing enforcement to ascertain if too could build a retaining wall like the one locat
ed at the above address. Housing enforcement has indicated i may not
and that this property
is under enforcement and has no knowledge of the above action although i saw it in a previous email.
housing enforcement that noone may build anything on parking strips due to the utility right away etc
what is the story
i own the property directly across the street on the north west corner of 600 south and 900 east
i attempted to scroll through old emails from planning but could not find the notice .
thanks
carolwicks aka blakely summerfield
5. MAILING LIST
1
FIRST NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
GAGE WILLIAMS 621 S GRAND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
LEER ZHANG; XIANZHENG ZHON 875 LURLINE DR FOSTER CITY CA 94404
CHIEN HWANG 2713 S CHADWICK ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
RYAN HEATH 605 S GRAND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
KARL BAUTNER 639 S BRIXEN CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
MICHAEL POLI 633 S GRAND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
MICHAEL POLI 633 S GRAND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
MICHAEL G MARTIN PO BOX 58602 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158
MICHAEL G MARTIN PO BOX 58602 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158
NEVERSWEAT LC 1568 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
ZACHARY LAZARE; COTI S HUD 639 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
MATTHEW S GRAY 367 TIMBER LAKES ESTATES HEBER UT 84032
STEVEN T ROENS; CHERYL HAR 627 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
EARL M DIXON; DOROTHY J AK 623 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
HILLBILLY HIGHROLLER INVES PO BOX 4559 PARK CITY UT 84060
SIOBHAN CARLILE 615 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
WHITEHOUSE PROPERTIES, LLC 674 N HAYSTACK MOUNTAIN HEBER CITY UT 84032
BRENT HARROW 6550 N HWY 38 BRIGHAM CITY UT 84302
ELLIS SPERRY SCHARFENAKER; 920 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
MICHAEL P KENNEDY; AMY KEN 601 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
R GARY LARSEN FAMILY INTER 7952 S WILLOWCREST RD COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121
TAMARA DENNING 870 E WILSHIRE PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
ROBERT "YORK" EKSTROM 624 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
D FAM TRUST 9 WATERLOO CIR PARK CITY UT 84060
ROBERT "YORK" EKSTROM 624 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
CHRISTOPHER AQUINO 12631 CAMINITO RADIANTE SAN DIEGO CA 92130
KAITLIN MAROUSIS 614 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
RYAN MCCARTY; RACHEL DAVIS 606 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
GRIFFITHS REVOCABLE TRUST 1021 E SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
LISA ABEGGLEN; JON ABEGGLE 862 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
SPENDLOVE PROPERTIES IV LL 2769 E WATER VISTA WY SANDY UT 84093
600 SOUTH APARTMENTS, LLC C/ PO BOX 743 CLEARFIELD UT 84089
DAVID I DALTON; GEORGIA P 923 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
JEFFERY NIELSON 1022 E PLATINUM WY WHITE CITY UT 84094
CLAYTON SCRIVNER 947 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
DAVID I DALTON; GEORGIA DA 923 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
MARIAN SHIOZAKI TRUST 07/0 854 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
CHRISTINE V NIELSON 913 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
900 EAST LLC C/O DARIN PICCOLI 939 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
MCDONALD AMY S 567 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
WHITE CAP PROPERTY MANAGEM563 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
555 SOUTH SLC 8161 S BUENO VISTA DR WEST JORDAN UT 84088
CAROL ANN WICKS TRUST 04/1 6693 S CANDLE CV COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121
JTD ENTERPRISES LLC 9458 S CROSSWOOD CIR SANDY UT 84092
MATTHEW S BOARDMAN; JESSIC 224 N CANYON RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CHELSEA PETERSON; CLAYTON 566 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
DEAN K BAER; KATHY K BAER 863 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
CURRENT OCCUPANT 619 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CURRENT OCCUPANT 609 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
CURRENT OCCUPANT 926 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
CURRENT OCCUPANT 640 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
CURRENT OCCUPANT 863 E WILSHIRE PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84107
CURRENT OCCUPANT 620 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108
CURRENT OCCUPANT 614-618 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109
CURRENT OCCUPANT 604 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110
CURRENT OCCUPANT 933 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
CURRENT OCCUPANT 935 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84112
CURRENT OCCUPANT 913 E 600 S # 3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84113
CURRENT OCCUPANT 915 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
CURRENT OCCUPANT 917 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115
CURRENT OCCUPANT 575 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116
CURRENT OCCUPANT 555 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117
CURRENT OCCUPANT 576 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84118
PLNPCM2021-00614 - Public Notice Addressses
2
CURRENT OCCUPANT 570 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84119
CURRENT OCCUPANT 568 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84120
PLNPCM2021-00614 - Public Notice Addressses
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 10, 2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: PLNPCM2021-01033 Homeless Resource Center and Homeless Shelter Text
Amendments
STAFF CONTACT: Nick Norris, Planning Director, nick.norris@slcgov.com or 801-535-6173
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the recommendation from the
Planning Commission to deny the proposal to prohibit homeless resource centers and homeless
shelters by removing the uses from the land use tables in the CG, D2, and D3 zoning districts.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This proposal was initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall in
October 2021. The initiation included three parts:
1. Prohibit new, future homeless shelters or homeless resources centers in all zoning
districts in the city.
2. Modify the conditional use standards for homeless shelters or homeless resource centers,
and
3. Distinguish between temporary overflow shelters and permanent shelters and homeless
resources centers that operate year-round and potentially allow temporary overflow
homeless shelters in certain zones.
This transmittal only includes part 1. Parts 2 and 3 are in the engagement process and will be
going to the Planning Commission in the coming months. They are not part of this proposal.
Lisa Shaffer (Feb 11, 2022 12:02 MST)02/11/2022
02/11/2022
Part 1 would remove homeless resource centers and homeless shelters from the land use tables
by deleting the “C” (indicating a use is a conditional use) in the land use tables for the CG
General Commercial, D2 Downtown Support, and D3 Downtown/Warehouse Residential Zoning
Districts. If approved, homeless resource centers and homeless shelters would not be allowed in
any zoning districts in the city. The uses also include a footnote to a qualifying provision that
follows each land use table. The footnote references a provision in Utah Code that has been
removed from Utah Code by the Utah Legislature. The footnote would be deleted as part of this
proposal.
This proposal includes some changes to Zoning Ordinance section 21A.36.350. The purpose of
these changes is to ensure that the existing regulations would apply to existing homeless resource
centers. The current language says that it applies to conditional uses. If the conditional use is
removed, then this wording needs to change so it would still apply. This section is likely to be
modified during part 2 of this proposal.
The City initiated the pending ordinance rule with this petition. The pending ordinance rule
allows a city to hold any application for a homeless resource center or homeless shelter for a
period of 180 days pending a change in city code. This applies to any application that is
submitted starting on the day the petition is initiated. The petition was initiated on October 4,
2021. The 180-day period expires on April 2, 2022. If the proposal or a modified version of the
proposal is adopted by April 2, 2022, any application that is submitted during the 180 period
would be denied because a homeless resource center and homeless shelter would no longer be
allowed. Alternatively, if a modified version is adopted, an application that complied with the
modified version may be processed and an application that did not comply would be denied. If
no changes are adopted by the 180-day deadline, the existing regulations go back into effect, and
any open applications would be processed under the current regulations.
In November 2021 the City Council adopted a motion that initiated a petition that asked the
administration to review and come back with recommendations for “prohibiting temporary
shelters until other jurisdictions in Salt Lake County permit them.” The initiation request from
Mayor Mendenhall and this one from the City Council are directly related to what would be the
same provisions in city code. Therefore, it is challenging to separate each request into a different
proposal. This proposal (to remove the uses from the land use table) does accomplish the City
Council request because it would prohibit any future shelter or resource center until such time as
the City Council adopts new regulations for either permanent or temporary shelters. If this
proposal is adopted, it does not prohibit the City Council from initiating temporary land use
regulations but would prevent any other entity from submitting a conditional use for either a
permanent or temporary/season shelter.
PUBLIC PROCESS: The proposed changes were outlined in a public information document
and made available to the public on November 16, 2021. A notice was sent to all registered,
recognized community organizations via email on the same date. This started the 45-day public
engagement period required by city code. The 45-day public engagement period ended on
January 1, 2022. This date only identifies the end date of the 45-day engagement period and
public input is still being accepted.
During the 45-day period a group of community councils hosted a virtual public forum where the
proposal was discussed, and people had the opportunity to ask questions. Information about the
number of attendees has not been provided to the Planning Division as of the date of this
transmittal. A transcript of the questions that were submitted through the Q/A function of the
virtual meeting platform has also not been provided. The questions and comments submitted
indicated a mixed level of support. Some people were in support of part 1 of the proposal, while
others felt that removing the uses without a more solid proposal to allow the uses in the future
was harmful to those experiencing homelessness. In the opinion of the Planning Division, most
people supported the idea of updating the process and the regulations, but they don’t want to
harm the people without homes, the service providers, or the surrounding community.
Two written comments were submitted to the Planning Division prior to the production date of
the staff report. The comments came from a group of community councils and from The Road
Home. Those comments can be found in the Planning Commission staff report.
The Planning Division also met with homeless service providers to discuss the proposal on
January 4, 2022. The service providers are concerned that removing the uses jeopardizes their
ability to take advantage of available resources that can help provide services and are concerned
that changes to the regulations will make it more difficult for the providers to shelter the
homeless. A summary of that meeting is also discussed in the Planning Commission staff report.
On January 6th, the community hosted a similar community forum in Spanish. This forum was
essentially the same as the one held on December 16th. The forum was moderated, and questions
and answers were provided by a Spanish speaking staff member of the Community and
Neighborhoods Department. A transcript has not been provided to the Planning Division, but
similar questions and issues were raised during this forum as were raised in the December 16th
forum.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 12, 2022. The public hearing was
posted on the Planning Division website, the Utah Public Notice website, and shared through the
Planning Division email listserv. No entities have requested mailed notice of this proposal and
no mailed notice was provided. Service providers were provided with an email notice of the
hearing. Written comments were provided to the Planning Commission and several people spoke
during the public hearing. The comments were mixed and ranged from support for the proposal
to opposition to the proposal. The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are linked in
this document and provide a summary of the comments made. One underlying theme of the
public comment was the need to act quickly to have an updated process to allow homeless
resource centers in the city. Some encouraged the process to spread the uses throughout the city,
while others supported the uses to be proximate to needed services. After the public hearing, the
Planning Commission was also mixed on the proposal and debated the right direction to go. The
Commission ended up adopting a motion to reject part one of the proposal, primarily because
they were concerned there was no timeline established to replace the conditional use process.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a) PC Agenda of January 12, 2022 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes of January 12, 2022 (Click to Access)
c) Planning Commission Staff Report of January 12, 2022 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1) Project Chronology
2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3) Original Petition
4) Public Comment Received after Planning Commission Staff Report was Published
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2022
(An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to
homeless resource center and homeless shelter text amendments)
An ordinance amending various Sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to
homeless resource center and homeless shelter text amendments pursuant to Petition No.
PLNPCM2021-01033.
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2021, Mayor Erin Mendenhall (the “Mayor”) initiated a
petition, Petition No. PLNPCM2021-01033, to consider, among other things, a text amendment to
the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit new future homeless shelters or homeless resources centers in all
zoning districts in the city;
WHEREAS, the Mayor initiated the petition pursuant to City ordinance, thereby, invoking
the pending ordinance doctrine recognized by Utah Code Section 10-9a-509 to prohibit new
homeless shelters and homeless resource centers in the city;
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held a
public hearing on January 12, 2022 to consider the aforementioned portion of the request initiated by
the Mayor to amend the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit new homeless shelters and homeless
resource centers within the city; and
WHEREAS, at its January 12, 2022 hearing, the Planning Commission voted to forward a
negative recommendation on the proposal related to the petition before it; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires, for the time being, to prohibit new
homeless shelters and homeless resource centers; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds, after holding a public hearing on this
matter, that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.C.
That Subsection 21A.33.010.C of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to
read as follows:
C. Uses Not Permitted: Any use not specifically permitted or conditionally permitted in the table
of permitted and conditional uses for the specific zoning district is prohibited. Only uses listed as
a “P” or a “C” in the table of permitted and conditional uses for a district shall be allowed where
designated.
SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section
21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional
Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the
table which shall read and appear in that table as follows:
21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR
COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS:
USE CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB
Homeless Resource Center
Homeless Shelter
SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the
“Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables:
Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to
remove qualifying provision number “21” and designate qualifying provision 21 as “reserved” as follows:
Qualifying Provisions:
21.[Reserved.]
SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section
21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional
Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the
table which shall read and appear in that table as follows:
21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN
DISTRICTS:
USE D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4
Homeless Resource Center
Homeless Shelter
SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the
“Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables:
Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to
remove qualifying provision number “15” and designate qualifying provision 15 as “reserved” as follows:
Qualifying Provisions:
15. [Reserved].
SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.350.A
and the title of section 21A.36.350. That Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.350.A and
the title of Section 21A.36.30 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows:
21A.36.350: REGULATIONS FOR HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTERS AND
HOMELESS SHELTERS:
A. A homeless resource center or homeless shelter located within the city shall comply with the
following regulations. Any homeless resource center or homeless shelter approved as a
conditional use shall comply with these regulations and the requirements of the approved
conditional use.
SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section
21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Definitions of Terms) shall be and hereby is amended to modify
the definition of “homeless resource center” and “homeless shelter” which shall read and appear as
follows:
HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER: An establishment in which co-located supportive services
such as sleeping, bathing, eating, laundry facilities, and housing case management is provided
on an emergency basis for individuals experiencing homelessness. Additional services may
include preparation and distribution of food; medical care and treatment; behavioral and
mental health counseling; employment counseling; educational instruction, and vocational
training.
HOMELESS SHELTER: An establishment in which sleeping accommodations are provided on
an emergency basis for individuals experiencing homelessness.
SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been
published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-
713.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of
______________, 2022.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2022.
Published: ______________.
1/31/2022
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 1
No. _____ of 2022 2
3
(An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to 4
homeless resource center and homeless shelter text amendments) 5
6
An ordinance amending various Sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to 7
homeless resource center and homeless shelter text amendments pursuant to Petition No. 8
PLNPCM2021-01033. 9
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2021, Mayor Erin Mendenhall (the “Mayor”) initiated a 10
petition, Petition No. PLNPCM2021-01033, to consider, among other things, a text amendment to 11
the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit new future homeless shelters or homeless resources centers in all 12
zoning districts in the city; 13
WHEREAS, the Mayor initiated the petition pursuant to City ordinance, thereby, invoking 14
the pending ordinance doctrine recognized by Utah Code Section 10-9a-509 to prohibit new 15
homeless shelters and homeless resource centers in the city; 16
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held a 17
public hearing on January 12, 2022 to consider the aforementioned portion of the request initiated by 18
the Mayor to amend the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit new homeless shelters and homeless 19
resource centers within the city; and 20
WHEREAS, at its January 12, 2022 hearing, the Planning Commission voted to forward a 21
negative recommendation on the proposal related to the petition before it; and 22
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires, for the time being, to prohibit new 23
homeless shelters and homeless resource centers; and 24
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds, after holding a public hearing on this 25
matter, that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 26
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 27
SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.C. 28
That Subsection 21A.33.010.C of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to 29
read as follows: 30
C. Uses Not Permitted: Any use specifically listed without a "P" or a "C" designated in the table 31
of permitted and conditional uses for a district shall not be allowed in that zoning district. Any 32
use not specifically permitted or conditionally permitted in the table of permitted and conditional 33
uses for the specific zoning district is prohibited. Only uses listed as a “P” or a “C” in the table of 34
permitted and conditional uses for a district shall be allowed where designated. 35
SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 36
21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional 37
Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the 38
table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 39
21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR 40
COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS: 41
USE CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB
Homeless Resource Center C21
Homeless Shelter C21
42
SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the 43
“Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: 44
Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to 45
remove qualifying provision number “21” and designate qualifying provision 21 as “reserved” as follows: 46
Qualifying Provisions: 47
21. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.350 of this title, the City may 48
not prohibit construction of a homeless resource center or homeless shelter if the site is 49
approved by and receives funding through the State Homeless Coordinating Committee, with 50
the concurrence of the Housing and Community Development Division within the Department 51
of Workforce Services, in accordance with section 35A-8-604 of the Utah Code. 52
53
21.[Reserved.] 54
55
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 56
21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional 57
Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the 58
table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 59
21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN 60
DISTRICTS: 61
USE D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4
Homeless Resource Center C15 C15
Homeless Shelter C15 C15
62
SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the 63
“Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: 64
Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to 65
remove qualifying provision number “15” and designate qualifying provision 15 as “reserved” as follows: 66
Qualifying Provisions: 67
15. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.350 of this title, the City may 68
not prohibit construction of a homeless resource center or homeless shelter if the site is 69
approved by and receives funding through the State Homeless Coordinating Committee, with 70
the concurrence of the Housing and Community Development Division within the Department 71
of Workforce Services, in accordance with section 35A-8-604 of the Utah Code. 72
73
15. [Reserved]. 74
75
SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.350.A 76
and the title of section 21A.36.350. That Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.350.A and 77
the title of Section 21A.36.30 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 78
21A.36.350: QUALIFYING PROVISIONS REGULATIONS FOR HOMELESS 79
RESOURCE CENTERS OR AND HOMELESS SHELTERS: 80
A. A homeless resource center or homeless shelter located within the city shall comply with the 81
following regulations. Any homeless resource center or homeless shelter approved as a 82
conditional use shall comply with these regulations and the requirements of the approved 83
conditional use. may be allowed as a conditional use, as identified in chapter 21A.33, "Land Use 84
Tables", of this title pursuant to the provisions of chapter 21A.54, "Conditional Uses", of this title 85
and the requirements of this section 86
87
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section 88
21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Definitions of Terms) shall be and hereby is amended to modify 89
the definition of “homeless resource center” and “homeless shelter” which shall read and appear as 90
follows: 91
HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER: An establishment building or portion thereof in which co-92
located supportive services such as sleeping, bathing, eating, laundry facilities, and housing case 93
management is provided on an emergency basis for individuals experiencing homelessness. 94
Additional services may include preparation and distribution of food; medical care and 95
treatment; behavioral and mental health counseling; employment counseling; educational 96
instruction, and vocational training. 97
98
HOMELESS SHELTER: An establishment in which sleeping accommodations are provided on 99
an emergency basis for individuals experiencing homelessness. Any homeless shelter that began 100
operation on or before January 1, 2016, may operate year round in accordance with section 10-101
9a-526 of the Utah Code. 102
103
SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been 104
published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-105
713. 106
107
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of 108
______________, 2022. 109
______________________________ 110
CHAIRPERSON 111
112
ATTEST: 113
114
______________________________ 115
CITY RECORDER 116
117
118
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 119
120
121
Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 122
123
124
125
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
______________________________ 126
MAYOR 127
128
______________________________ 129
CITY RECORDER 130
131
(SEAL) 132
Bill No. ________ of 2022. 134
Published: ______________. 135
136
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
3. ORIGINAL PETITION
4. MAILING LIST
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2021-01033
October 4, 2021 Petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall. Notice of pending ordinance
invoked by the city, starting 180-day decision making period.
October 6, 2021 Internal meeting to discuss how to proceed with the proposal and what
sections of the zoning code may be impacted.
October 21, 2021 Internal meeting to discuss community engagement.
October 26, 2021 Internal meeting to discuss expectations for this project.
November 2, 2021 Internal meeting to review draft proposal.
November 4, 2021 Internal meeting to discuss potential legal issues with the proposal.
November 16, 2021 Notice and information sent to all recognized organizations starting the
45-day public engagement period.
December 13, 2021 Presentation to Sugar House Community Council Land Use Committee
December 16, 2021 Virtual community forum hosted by recognized organizations.
December 29, 2021 Public notice for January 12, 2022 Planning Commission public hearing
sent to Division list serve, posted on city website, and posted on Utah
Public Meeting website. Property posted with sign advertising public
hearing.
January 3, 2022 Meeting with service providers to discuss the proposal.
January 6, 2022 Virtual community forum hosted by recognized organizations held in
Spanish.
January 12, 2022 Planning Commission public hearing.
2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition P:NPCM2021-01033 – A petition initiated by Mayor
Erin Mendenhall to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Code by removing Homeless Resource Centers and
Homeless Shelters as conditional uses from the land use tables for the CG General Commercial, D-2
Downtown Support, and D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential Zoning Districts, modifying 21A.33.010
to clarify when listed land uses are prohibited, modifying the applicability section of 21A.36.350
Qualifying Provisions for Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters, and modifying the
definitions of homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in 21A.62. The City Council may consider
modifications to other related sections of the code as part of this proposal.
DATE: Date #1 and Date #2
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
All persons interested and present will be given an opportunity to be heard in this matter.
This meeting will be held via electronic means, while potentially also providing for an in-
person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building,
located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. If you are interested in
participating during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting, please visit the website
www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings/ or call 801-535-7654 to obtain connection
information.
Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-7654 or
sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any
source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Nick Norris at 801-535-6173 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday or via e-mail at nick.norris@slcgov.com
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance
in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make
a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or
relay service 711.
3. ORIGINAL PETITION
4. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PUBLISHED
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 1/26/2022
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 1/26/2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 1/26/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board.
STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan
jessi.eagan@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Housing Trust Fund
Advisory Board.
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Katie Darter as a member of the
Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board.
/
( )
,,,,,,,11111 ,,.,,,'
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
January 26, 2022
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Dugan,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Housing Trust Fund
Advisory Board.
Katie Darter - to be appointed for a three year term ending Monday, December 29, 2025, starting
from the date of City Council advice and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
.. Ji. ..
'•
/ ;\
trfj
\ .. l
,,,,, u111 ,v·'
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 1/28/2022
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 1/28/2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 1/28/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Business Advisory Board.
STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan
jessi.eagan@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Business Advisory Board
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Kristina Olivas as a member of
the Business Advisory Board
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
January 28, 2022
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Dugan,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Business Advisory Board
Kristina Olivas - to be appointed for a four year term ending December 28, 2026, starting from the
date of City Council advice and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 1/31/2022
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 1/31/2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 1/31/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Airport Board.
STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan
jessi.eagan@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment: Airport Board
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint John Bradshaw as a member of
the Airport Board
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
January 31, 2022
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Dugan,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Airport Board
John Bradshaw - to be appointed for a four year term ending June 30, 2025, starting from the date
of City Council advice and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 1/28/2022
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 1/28/2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 1/28/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Library Board.
STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan
jessi.eagan@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Library Board
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Sarah Reale as a member of the
Library Board
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
January 28, 2022
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Dugan,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Library Board
Sarah Reale - to be appointed for a four year term ending June 30, 2025, starting from the date
of City Council advice and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Received: 2/11/2022
Date Sent to Council: 2/11/2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 2/11/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Reappointment Recommendation: Business Advisory Board.
STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan
jessi.eagan@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Reappointment: Business Advisory Board.
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and reappoint Darin Piccoli as a member of
the Business Advisory Board.
/
( )
,,,,,,,11111 ,,.,,,'
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
February 10, 2022
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Dugan,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership reappointment to the Business Advisory
Board
Darin Piccoli - to be reappointed for a four year term ending December 28, 2026, starting from
the date of City Council advice and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this reappointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
.. Ji. ..
'•
/ ;\
trfj
\ .. l
,,,,, u111 ,v·'