The URL can be used to link to this page

03/22/2022 - Work Session - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL REVISED AGENDA WORK SESSION March 22,2022 Tuesday 2:00 PM Council Work Room 451 South State Street Room 326 Salt Lake City,UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com 7:00 pm Formal Meeting Room 326 (See separate agenda) Welcome and public meeting rules In accordance with State Statute and City Ordinance,the meeting may be held electronically.After 5:00 p.m.,please enter the City & County Building through the main east entrance. The Work Session is a discussion among Council Members and select presenters.The public is welcome to listen.Items scheduled on the Work Session or Formal Meeting may be moved and /or discussed during a different portion of the Meeting based on circumstance or availability of speakers. Please note:Dates not identified in the FYI -Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined.Item start times and durations are approximate and are subject to change at the Chair’s discretion. Generated:10:15:32 The Council has returned to a hybrid meeting approach.The hybrid meeting enables people joining remotely or in-person to listen to the Council meeting and participate during public comment items. Public Comments:The public can give comments to the Council during the meetings online through Webex or in-person in Room 326 of the City and County Building.In-person attendees can fill out a comment card and online participants will register through Webex in order to be added to the comment queue. Agenda &Registration Information:For more information,including Webex connection information,please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings.(A phone line will also be available for people whose only option is to call in.) Public Health Information:Masks are no longer required in City Facilities,but are welcome for any attendees who prefer to continue using them.We will continue to monitor the situation take any reasonable precautions for the public and staff. Work Session Items 1.Informational:Updates from the Administration ~2:00 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive an update from the Administration on major items or projects, including but not limited to: •COVID-19,the March 2020 Earthquake,and the September 2020 Windstorm; •Updates on relieving the condition of people experiencing homelessness; •Police Department work,projects,and staffing,etc.;and •Other projects or updates. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 2.Informational:Equity Update ~2:30 p.m. 15 min The Council will hold a discussion about various initiatives led by the City's Office of Equity and Inclusion.These initiatives include,but are not limited to,improving racial equity and justice in policing.Discussion may also include updates on the City's other work to achieve equitable service delivery,decision-making,and community engagement through the Citywide Equity Plan,increased ADA resources,language access,and other topics addressed in the ongoing work of the Human Rights Commission and the Racial Equity in Policing Commission. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 3.Ordinance:Homeless Resource Center and Homeless Shelter Text Amendments Follow-up ~2:45 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about a proposal that would amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Code by removing Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters as conditional uses from the land use tables for the CG General Commercial,D-2 Downtown Support,and D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential Zoning Districts,modify 21A.33.010 to clarify when listed land uses are prohibited,modify the applicability section of 21A.36.350 Qualifying Provisions for Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters,and modify the definitions of homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in 21A.62. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 8,2022 and Tuesday,March 22,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,March 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 22,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 22,2022 4.Ordinance:Stealth Towers Text Amendments ~3:05 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance to allow Stealth Wireless Telecommunication Facilities taller than 35 feet (up to 75 feet)in height within the Public Lands (PL)Zoning District.Stealth facilities are currently limited to 35 feet in height.This request is specifically related to a proposal by the applicant to construct a stealth cellular tower at the Pioneer Police Precinct at 1040 West 700 South,but the proposed text amendment would apply to properties within the PL district citywide. The Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation,therefore an ordinance has not been drafted.If the Council decides to approve the zone amendment,an ordinance would be drafted and considered for approval. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 5,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 19,2022 5.Ordinance:Zoning Map Amendment at Western Gardens 550 South 600 East ~3:25 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning of the property located at 550 South 600 East Street from CN (Neighborhood Commercial District)to FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood District).The parcel is currently occupied by the Western Gardens commercial center.This proposal would facilitate redevelopment of this parcel into a multifamily residential project.The zoning map amendment does not require an amendment to the Central Community Master Plan.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 5,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 19,2022 6.One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant &Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2022-23 ~3:45 p.m. 60 min The Council will receive a briefing about the Mayor’s funding recommendations and an appropriations resolution that would adopt the One-year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2022-23.The plan includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)funding,HOME Investment Partnership Program funding,Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)funding,Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)funding.The resolution would approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 15,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 22,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 19,2022 7.Tentative Break ~4:45 p.m. 20 min. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 8.Informational:Citizens’Compensation Advisory Committee 2022 Annual Report ~5:05 p.m. 20 min The Council will be briefed by the Citizens’Compensation Advisory Committee to review the 2022 Annual Report.The report includes information and recommendations about market comparisons of City employee salaries,compensation strategies,and turnover data,and is presented for consideration each year prior to the City's budget review process. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 9.Informational:Non-Represented Employees Salary Survey Report ~5:25 p.m. 30 min The Council will receive a briefing about the 2022 compensation of non-represented employees report.Approximately one-third of the City’s employees are not represented by a collective bargaining group.The report was conducted by a third-party and provides recommendations to ensure the City is able to retain employees and be in a competitive hiring position. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 10.Informational:Discussion of Support for Sister City in Ukraine ~5:55 p.m. 15 min. The Council may discuss and express support for the sister City relationship with Chernivtsi, Ukraine. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 11.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 Follow-up Written Briefing - The Council will receive a written briefing about an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document,for Fiscal Year 2021-22.Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets,including proposed project additions and modifications.The proposed amendment includes funding for new Arts Council employees,adding a second sergeant to the Special Victims Unit,and additional Emergency Rental Assistance Program funding from the Federal Government,among other items. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,February 1,2022;Tuesday,February 8,2022;Tuesday,February 15,2022; and March 22,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 1,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 15,2022 and Tuesday March 1, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 1,2022 and Tuesday March 22,2022 12.Board Appointment:Planning Commission –Rich Tuttle ~6:10 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Rich Tuttle prior to considering appointment to the Planning Commission for a term ending March 22,2026. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 22,2022 13.Board Appointment:City and County Building Conservation and Use Committee –Catherine Tucker ~6:15 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Catherine Tucker prior to considering appointment to the City and County Building Conservation and Use Committee for a term ending July 20,2026. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 22,2022 14.Board Appointment:Bicycle Advisory Committee –Sarah Johnson ~6:20 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Sarah Johnson prior to considering appointment to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending September 29,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 22,2022 15.Board Appointment:Transportation Advisory Board –Tyler Schmidt ~6:25 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Tyler Schmidt prior to considering appointment to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 29,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 22,2022 Standing Items 16.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. 17.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director Report of the Executive Director,including a review of Council information items and announcements.The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business,including but not limited to scheduling items. 18.Tentative Closed Session The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session.A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including,but not limited to: a.discussion of the character,professional competence,or physical or mental health of an individual; b.strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase,exchange,or lease of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if public discussion of the transaction would: (i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if: (i)public discussion of the transaction would: (A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration;or (B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale;and (iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel,devices,or systems;and g.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code §78B-1-137,and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 1:00 pm on Monday,March 21,2022,the undersigned,duly appointed City Recorder,does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1)posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701,and (2)a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. CINDY LOU TRISHMAN SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda,including but not limited to adoption,rejection,amendment,addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City &County Building is an accessible facility.People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation,which may include alternate formats,interpreters,and other auxiliary aids and services.Please make requests at least two business days in advance.To make a request,please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com,801-535-7600,or relay service 711. Administrative updates March 21, 2022 COVID 19 update Current status Salt Lake County is now in "low" transmission. Hospitalizations statewide have continued to decline over the past month. In SLCo, 35.2% of kids aged 5-11 are fully vaccinated, up from 30.82% on March 8. In SLCo, 67.8%of kids aged 12-17 are fully vaccinated, up from 66.97% on March 8. The percentage of Utahans who are current on their vaccinations has held at just 27% since the end of February. The new variant –BA.2 As of March 1, only 5% of the cases in Salt Lake County were BA.2 This variant appears to be highly contagious, but not more serious than Omicron. Being up-to-date on vaccinations appears to be highly protective. Citywide vaccination average = 69% (68.78% on March 8) Zip % fully vaccinated 2.1 2.8 2.15 3.1 3.8 3.21 84101 80.70 81.27 81.69 82.40 82.50 82.91 84102 62.08 62.27 62.56 62.74 62.82 62.95 84103 73.14 73.32 73.60 73.80 73.85 74.00 84104 52.23 52.68 53.15 53.71 53.94 54.22 84105 72.81 73.01 73.19 73.34 73.39 73.50 84106 66.81 67.06 67.40 67.67 67.78 67.95 84108 73.38 73.51 73.68 73.83 73.91 74.05 84109 74.65 74.89 75.11 75.34 75.39 75.52 84111 71.91 72.34 72.93 73.42 73.54 73.80 84115 61.82 62.17 62.49 62.92 63.08 63.36 84116 54.90 55.36 55.78 56.29 56.46 56.72 www.slc.gov/feedback/ Regularly updated with ways to engage with the City. Community Engagement Highlights Engagement Effort Lead Department / Division Status Affordable Housing OverlayPlanningActive, Public Engagement is being planned with a citywide mailer in April. Thriving In PlaceCommunity and Neighborhoods Survey is Open and Website is live at thrivinginplaceslc.org Glendale Water ParkPublic Lands / ParksActive, Public Engagement. Survey Open -will close April 16th Ballpark Station Area PlanPlanningActive, Public Comment Period Shelter ZoningPlanning Removal -@ Council / Rewrite -Internal analysis of factors to consider for future HRC locations will be complete by end of March, stakeholder engagement will start in April. Northpoint Small Area Plan UpdatePlanningOngoing Community Engagement, draft plan expected in June, Public comment will continue during that time and through the adoption process. Downtown Plan ImplementationPlanning Public Input Phase, draft ordinance expected April 1st. There will be an internal review with a public release of the draft in second half of April. Followed by adoption process. 1300 East Reconstruction Transportation Stakeholder meeting continue 1100 East Reconstruction Transportation Meeting with constituents (typically on-site) as necessary as part of on-going outreach (for example, met with Sugar House Coffee yesterday) 200 South Reconstruction Transportation Finalize block-level outreach this week.There was a high level of awareness about the project and overall support. We didn’t encounter big concerns about parking loss that we were expecting (angled parking 400 W –200 W). Engagement Effort Lead Department / Division Status 2700 South Restriping Transportation Public outreach efforts (webpage, flyers, Community Council meetings, etc.) will begin soon on this upcoming resurfacing project 400 South Bus Stop Improvements Transportation Email outreach is on-going and yard signs and postcards have been sent out 600 North and 1000 North Bus Stop Improvements Transportation Sending 6000 postcards on the Westside with information about new bus service, bus stops, On-Demand, and Change Day (in a unified message) Capital Hill Traffic Calming Transportation Actively working with Constituents to develop public engagement materials and project messaging UTA (All Service)Transportation The comment period for August 2022 Change Day is now open (significant changes planned for the bus network within Salt Lake City) 900 South Reconstruction/9-Line Trail Transportation Transition from design to construction engagement, construction begins in April 300 North Bridge Transportation Contractor’s public engagement consultant is sending weekly emails (noisiest part of construction is over) Avenues Streets Restriping Transportation Online surveys about five street redesign opportunities (Virginia, B, 3rd, 11th, Terrace Hills) are now open -Community Council meetings and newsletter information is coming soon Community Renewable Energy Program - Plan for Low-Income Assistance Sustainability Hosted informational meetings the first week of March for community partners to work on policies, communications plan, survey distribution, and hosting community meetings Resident Food Equity Advisors Sustainability The department is seeking applications through March 6th for the next cohort to begin in mid-April. Engagement Effort Lead Department / Division Status City Creek Water Treatment Plant upgrades Public Utilities Active and long-term. Plant to be rebuilt in phases so water treatment can continue uninterrupted. Step 1 underway, which includes retaining wall construction from early April to Memorial Day. Watershed Management Plan update Public Utilities Active. A stand-alone project website is currently under construction. Area stakeholders (officials from nearby cities, ski resort representatives, canyon property owners, recreational groups to name a few) will be joining us in initial engagement with through May 2022. Rose Park Jordan River Project (at Cornell St.)Public Utilities This stormwater treatment project is functionally complete, with spring landscaping coming in the next few weeks.. East West Conveyance Line Project Public Utilities In final stages of construction at Forest Dale Golf Course. Construction is anticipated to finish in late Spring 2022. State Street Waterline (1st Ave. to 200 North)Public Utilities Active. Replacing a key waterline, 100+ years old. Project includes sewer rehab work, replacement of residential water meters. Significant public impact expected on north State St. Water Reclamation Facility Public Utilities Long-term project. Active. Currently determining appropriate time/date for a public open house (probably a hybrid event with Zoom and in-person) in May. Proposed utility rate increases Public Utilities Departmental budget is being finalized. Following budget presentation to the Mayor, we will initiate mailed proposed rate increase notices to our City and suburban customers. Homelessness Update: HRC and Overflow Occupancy March 14th -18th STH -1000 West Men's HRC STH -King Women's HRC STH -Miller Mixed HRC Total St Vincent de Paul Shelter Capacity 300 200 200 700 Avg number of beds occupied/night 291 196 198 685 67 Avg number of beds unoccupied/night 9 4 2 15 Avg % of beds occupied/night 96.9%98%99%97.8% Avg % of beds unoccupied/night 3.1%2%1%1.2% Cleaning and Abatements -Jordan River continues to be the priority due to increased needs. -Victory Road/ Foothills-hill conditions make it difficult to clean. Current support efforts include toilets, handwashing stations and regular trash pick-up on site. Recent Resource Fair Mar 11th @ Day-Riverside Library -State Court Law Library/ Help Desk 10 engagements -Road Home Housing Locators 5 engagements -SLC Justice Court 3 cases heard -Ruff Haven 3 engagements -Rescue Mission 10 engagements -Odyssey House/ Martindale Clinic 5 engagements -South Salt Lake homelessness staff Homelessness update March-October Schedule High Utilizer Court & Homeless Court @ Weigand Center:1st Friday/ month Resource Fairs:next one-April 8th 2nd Friday/ month Rotating locations Kayak Court:next one-April 15th 3rd Friday/ month Rotating locations Homelessness update Homelessness Overflow Shelter status 801-990-9999 •St. Vincent de Paul -open nightly until April 15 •Scattered Motel Rooms -24/7-referral only from HRC's -open until June 30 •High Needs Temporary Housing Program (formerly the Ramada Inn motel rooms) -referral-only hotel rooms for elderly and medically vulnerable people -open 24/7 -moving back to HRC's by April 15 •Redwood Overflow Beds (formerly the Ramada Inn common areas) - -open nightly from 7pm –6:30am -open until April 15 •The best way to access emergency shelter beds is:801-990-9999 Support for Ukraine and our sister city of Chernivtsi Strangersinukraine.org all proceeds go to Razom and Lifting Hands International via Equality Utah, a not-for-profit organization based in Utah. SLCPD Community Outreach Update Chief Mike Brown Community Outreach Update •In Fall of 2021, we released our Revised Crime Control Plan. •That had four main goals: •Lower Crime •Improve Response Times •Fill Vacant Positions •Continue Building Community Relationships Building Community Relationships Calvary Baptist Church Law Enforcement Meet-and-Greet Building Community Relationships SLC St. Patricks Day Parade -Motor Officers led the parade -Contact with hundreds of people Building Community Relationships Lutheran Redeemer School Visit -Officers visited with children who asked about their jobs -Everyone got a sticker (very popular). Building Community Relationships Whittier Elementary School Visit -Read to classroom -Students were highly engaged -Teachers want us to come back Item A9 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet Policy Analyst DATE:March 22, 2022 3:00PM RE:Text Amendment: Prohibition on Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters PLNPCM2021-01033 MOTION 1 – continue I move the council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 – close and defer I move the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 3 – close and reject I move the Council close the public hearing and reject the ordinance. MOTION 4 – close and adopt I move the City Council close the public hearing and adopt ordinances 15A and 15B to amend the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-01033. I further move the Council approve a Legislative Intent, urging the Administration to include in their review process for Parts 2 and 3 of the HRC/Shelter text amendment petition, recommendations to promote geographic equity of HRCs/Shelters by expanding the zoning districts where they are allowed in the City. COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE: March 22, 2022 RE:Text Amendment: Prohibition on Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters PLNPCM2021-01033 PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: March 8, 2022 Set Date: March 1, 2022 Public Hearing: March 22, 2022 Potential Action: March 22, 2022 March 8 Work Session Summary During the work session meeting, Council and Planning staff provided an overview of the proposed text amendment and of HB 440-Homeless Services Amendment, recently adopted legislation by the State. Some Council Members expressed that while they recognize the current Homeless Resource Center (HRC) and Shelter approval process isn’t working and must be improved, they have concerns about removing HRCs and Shelters from the land use tables without a guarantee they will be allowed again with a better process. The Council asked whether options are available to guarantee the HRC/Shelter use would be put back in the ordinance by a certain time. The Attorney’s Office and Planning staff proposed an option for the Council to adopt two ordinances: The first ordinance would remove HRCs/Shelters from the Land Use Tables. The second ordinance would implement a future date certain that HRC/Shelters would again be allowed in in the zones they are currently located (CG, D2 and D3), unless it is repealed due to the preferred changes that are being reviewed by the Planning Staff are adopted. Page | 2 The Council expressed support for this plan and asked staff to draft the second ordinance to be considered at the time of potential adoption. The second ordinance is included in the packet. Planning staff outlined the potential changes and public engagement process for the next steps of the zoning amendment. The next steps will seek to modify conditional use standards for HRCs and shelters and distinguish between temporary overflow shelters and permanent shelters. Planning staff also explained how the updated zoning changes could work either through an overlay zone and improved conditions and standards that would have to be satisfied to be approved. Planning staff also discussed the Council’s legislative intent requesting “recommendations for prohibiting temporary shelters until other jurisdictions in Salt Lake County permit them” and how it will be included in the review process. Based on the Council’s discussion, staff drafted a legislative intent encouraging the Administration to include in their research and review for Parts 2 and 3 of this petition, an analysis and recommendation to expand areas of the city where HRCs and Shelters are allowed, with a goal to promote geographic equity. Here is the Legislative Intent that will be included in the motion sheet: I further move the Council approve a Legislative Intent, urging the Administration to include in their review process for Parts 2 and 3 of the HRC/Shelter text amendment petition, recommendations to promote geographic equity of HRCs/Shelters by expanding the zoning districts where they are allowed in the City. Policy Questions The Draft ordinance that would reinstate HRCs and Shelters as an allowed use has an effective date of January 1, 2023, unless otherwise repealed. This would allow the City nine months to process the other amendments. o Does the Council support this effective date? Next Steps The Council will hold a public hearing on March 22, 2022. During this time the public will be able to provide feedback on the prosed zoning amendments. After the hearing, the Council can consider any of the following options: Continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. Close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. Close the public hearing and reject the ordinance. Close the public hearing and adopt the ordinances. o Two ordinances would be included – one would at future date certain, allow HRC/Shelters in in the zones they are currently allowed (CG, D2 and D3) o Include legislative intent promoting geographic equity by expanding the zones where HRC/Shelters are allowed The following information was provided for the March 8 work session. It is provided again for background purposes. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE Page | 3 The City Council will be briefed on a proposal that would prohibit homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in the city by removing the uses from land use tables in the CG, D2 and D3 zoning districts. According to Planning staff, this is not meant to be a permanent prohibition. It’s the first of three planned phases to help the City establish an updated process for locating shelters and HRCs. Mayor Mendenhall initiated the pending ordinance rule with this petition on October 4, 2021. The pending ordinance rule allows the City to hold any application for a homeless resource center or homeless shelter for a period of 180 days pending a change in City code. This applies to any application that is submitted starting on the day the petition is initiated. The 180-day period expires April 2, 2022. Last week the Utah Legislature approved HB 440 Homeless Services Amendments. One component of this bill requires cities in Salt Lake County, through the Conference of Mayors, to come up with a winter overflow plan by September 1, 2022. The ordinance that is now before the Council was forwarded before that legislation was adopted by the State and has been going through the standard planning process for the last few months. The Council hasn’t had opportunity to have a discussion since legislative session ended. This briefing will provide the Council an opportunity to consider this text amendment in context of the recently adopted legislation. This is discussed further below, item #4 in Potential Options / Outcomes. When the Mayor initiated the pending ordinance, it included three parts. Part 1 - Prohibit new, future homeless shelters or homeless resources centers in all zoning districts in the city - Current Transmittal Part 2 - Modify the conditional use standards for homeless shelters or homeless resource centers. Part 3 - Distinguish between temporary overflow shelters and permanent shelters and homeless resources centers that operate year-round and potentially allow temporary overflow homeless shelters in certain zones. Parts 2 and 3 are in the engagement process and will be going to the Planning Commission in the coming months. This zoning amendment (Part 1) would do the following: Remove Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters as conditional uses from the land use tables for the CG General Commercial, D-2 Downtown Support, and D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential Zoning Districts. Clarify when listed land uses are prohibited. Modify the applicability section of 21A.36.350 Qualifying Provisions for Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters. Modify the definitions of homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in 21A.62. Planning staff recommended removing homeless resource centers and homeless shelters from the land use tables because they found it was “has ad The Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation for Part 1 of this petition primarily because they were concerned there was no timeline established to replace the conditional use process (Parts 2 and 3). See page 5 for more information on public comments received in the process so far. Page | 4 Potential Options / Outcomes 1. If the City Council adopts the ordinance. a. Homeless Shelters and Homeless Resources Centers will not be permitted in the city. b. Parts 2 and 3 will come to the Council for consideration in the coming months. The Council could have a public process and consider or adjust any proposal for Parts 2 and 3 as part of the regular Council process. 2. If the Council rejects the ordinance. a. Homeless Shelters and Homeless Resources Centers will again be permitted in the city as a conditional use in the CG, D2 and D3 zoning districts (see attached map). b. Someone could apply to build/operate a shelter or HRC i. The City would have to process the conditional use application under the current standards, which is a planning commission review process. 3. Let the pending ordinance expire without acting. a. Homeless Shelters and Homeless Resources Centers will again be permitted in the city as a conditional use in the CG, D2 and D3 zoning districts. b. Someone could apply to build/operate a shelter or HRC i. The City would have to process the conditional use application under the current standards, which is a planning commission review process. 4. Ask the Planning Staff / Attorney’s Office if there are other options that could be considered to help preserve the City’s options. a. Work with the Administration to determine if the Council could adopt an ordinance that would prohibit Shelters and HRCs and include a provision that would expire on a date to be determined and must come back to the Council to renew it and reconsider to make permanent. i. This would allow for a true pause in any additional shelters in Salt Lake City while the conversation with other Mayors in the County takes place. b. In addition to this ordinance, the Council could consider adopting a resolution expressing support for the process outlined in the recently adopted State legislation that requires Salt Lake County cities to come up with a plan to address temporary overflow during the winter months by September 1. Policy Questions The Council may wish to ask how the legislative action adopted by the Council in November 2021 will be included in the research and review process for Parts 2 and 3 of this issue. (see paragraph below) The Council may wish to ask what the anticipated timeline is for Parts 2 and 3 to be processed and forwarded to the Council for consideration. The Council may wish to ask for the administration to provide an overview of potential changes to the conditional use process that Parts 2 of the petition will address. Page | 5 The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration if recent state legislation impacts this proposal. Council Initiated Legislative Action On November 16, 2021, the Council adopted the following legislative intent, when adopting the ordinance that permitted the temporary shelter on North Temple and Redwood Road. I further move the Council initiate a legislative action asking the Administration review and come back with recommendations for prohibiting temporary shelters until other jurisdictions in Salt Lake County permit them. On page 2 of the Transmittal Letter, Planning staff noted this amendment relates directly to the section of City code being revised with these petitions. Additionally, on page 6 on the Planning Commission staff report, staff noted this would require “identifying some criteria for evaluating when other jurisdictions have accomplished this. This likely requires the gathering of data and researching other jurisdiction zoning regulations so that information can be used to establish the criteria. This also requires creating some sort of process to determine when the criteria have been satisfied…” The Council’s legislative action can be factored into the research and drafting process for Parts 2 and 3 of the petition. Parts 2 and 3 of the Petition According to the Planning Commission staff report, Mayor Mendenhall initiated a petition to amend the zoning ordinance as it relates to Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters, and it was divided up into three parts. Staff felt Parts 2 and 3 would need a more thorough discussion with stakeholders and therefore they did not process them with Part 1, currently before the Council. Pages 5-6 of the Planning Commission’s report provides the following discussion pertaining to the next stages of work that will be done for this issue. Part 2 - Modify the conditional use standards for homeless shelters or homeless resource centers. Part 3 - Distinguish between temporary overflow shelters and permanent shelters and homeless resources centers that operate year-round and potentially allow temporary overflow homeless shelters in certain zones. o Updating the conditional use standards may not be sufficient to address the full range of impacts, needs, and considerations that are associated with siting, operating, and responding to the variety of needs for these uses. o It is possible that a different process will be used that puts the final decision-making authority on new homeless resource centers and homeless shelters with the City Council. Page | 6 o Options being considered include the use of development agreements and an overlay zone that would be mapped (zoning map amendment) as part of the approval process for future homeless resource centers. As these would be new regulations and processes, it likely requires fairly well researched regulations and discussions with a wider variety of stakeholders. It would be necessary to include not just residents and business owners, but also service providers and other government agencies, including the State of Utah. Key Considerations The planning commission staff reported noted four key considerations. Below is a short summary of those consideration. 1. The Conditional Use Process State code dictates the conditional use process. The conditional use process is intended to identify impacts to surrounding properties and provide a process to mitigation them, according to standards outlined in City ordinance. The Planning Commission reviews conditional uses in the city. Concerns have been raised that the Planning Commission is not able to consider other factors that have an impact on City services such as public safety, fire, EMS. Therefore, Part 2 of this petition will consider modifications to the conditional use standards for homeless shelters or homeless resource centers. 2. Impact to Existing Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters Existing homeless resource centers and homeless shelters would technically become nonconforming uses with this change. This does not mean that the conditional approval goes away, it would still apply. A technical change will be made that ensures they are still identified as a conditional use. 3. When will Items 2 and 3 be discussed? Planning Staff has begun researching and drafting Parts 2 and 3 of this petition. It is possible that a different process will be used that puts the final decision-making authority on new homeless resource centers and homeless shelters with the City Council. Options being considered include the use of development agreements and an overlay zone that would be mapped (zoning map amendment) as part of the approval process for future homeless resource centers. These changes will require well researched regulations and discussions with a wider variety of stakeholders. It would be necessary to include not just residents and business owners, but also service providers and other government agencies, including the State of Utah. The Councill’s Legislative Intent, which will require identifying criteria and a process for when that criterion has been satisfied, will also be part of this process. Page | 7 4. Community Engagement Please see pages 4-8 of the Planning Commission staff report for full analysis See public process section below The 180-day pending ordinance doctrine and time of year were impediments to good community engagement. This is a major factor in the Planning Division in dividing the proposal into different parts. The Planning Commission reviewed and forwarded a negative recommendation for Part 1 of the petition Parts 2 and 3 of the petition will be considered in the coming months. Public Process A summary of the public process is outlined on pages 2-3 of the Transmittal Letter. The text amendment went through the required 45-day notice to all recognized organizations. A virtual public forum was held with community councils. Planning staff met with homeless service providers to discuss the proposal on January 4, 2022 On January 6th a community forum in Spanish was conducted. The Planning Commission held the public hearing on January 12, 2022. Comments have generally been a mix of support and opposition to the proposal. See Attachment E of the Planning Commission staff report to review the submitted comments. The transmittal letter notes an underlying theme of the public comment was the need to act quickly to have an updated process to allow homeless resource centers in the city. Some have said that removing Shelters/HRCs as an allowed use, even for a short time, will have an impact on planning and fundraising for service providers. Some encouraged the process to spread the uses throughout the city, while others supported the uses to be proximate to needed services. Others expressed concerns about nuisance impacts shelters can have on a neighborhood where they are located. The Planning Commission adopted a motion to reject Part 1 of this petition, primarily because they were concerned there was no timeline established to replace the conditional use process. Council Public Engagement A project website for the public to follow this issue has been posted on the Council Website. It will be updated as new information becomes available. Staff included information on this petition in the email updates and social media and sent out an email blast to stakeholders, with the days and times for the work session briefing and public hearing and links to the website. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No.15B of 2022 3 4 (An ordinance amending Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to homeless resource 5 center and homeless shelter uses) 6 7 An ordinance amending Chapter 21A.33 (Land Use Tables) of the Salt Lake City Code 8 pertaining homeless resource center and homeless shelter uses related to Petition No. PLNPCM2021- 9 01033 and pursuant to Ordinance No. 15A of 2022. 10 WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 15A of 2022 amended the land use tables prohibiting homeless 11 shelters and homeless resource centers within the city with the intention of further studying how to 12 thoughtfully, responsibly, and compassionately regulate the land uses; 13 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council (the “City Council”) has requested that the Mayor 14 engage her professional staff to conduct outreach, study means and methods for regulating uses 15 similar to homeless shelters and homeless resource centers, and bring back to the City Council at a 16 future date a recommended proposal on how to regulate homeless shelters and homeless resource 17 centers; 18 WHEREAS, in accordance with Utah Code §10-9a-502 the Planning Commission held a 19 public hearing on January 12, 2022 to consider the Mayor’s petition, Petition No. PLNPCM2021- 20 01033 and other considerations related to the regulations of homeless resource centers and homeless 21 shelter land uses, and throughout the course of those discussions expressed concern over an outright 22 prohibition of homeless shelters and homeless resources for an indefinite period of time and ultimately, 23 elected to vote in favor of forwarding a negative recommendation because the Planning Commission was 24 concerned there was no timetable established to replace the conditional use process; 25 WHEREAS, the City Council shares the concern with the Planning Commission that a 26 citywide prohibition on homeless resource centers and homeless shelters is not a desired outcome for LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 27 the city long term but appreciates the need for the city to identify alternative means and methods for 28 regulating the land uses and acknowledges the issue is complex and will take additional time; 29 WHEREAS, the City Council desires to implement at a future date a regulatory scheme that 30 allows for land uses similar to homeless shelters and homeless resource centers within the City 31 subject to thoughtful, responsible, and compassionate regulation; 32 WHEREAS, the City Council desires to receive from the city’s professional staff a 33 recommended proposal on how to best regulate homeless shelters and homeless resource centers 34 and/or similar uses; 35 WHEREAS, the City Council requests that periodic updates regarding the proposal be 36 presented to the City Council and that the city staff’s recommended proposal, accompanied by the 37 Planning Commission’s recommendation on the proposal, be presented to the City Council no later 38 than January 31, 2023. 39 WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. 15A of 2022, homeless shelters and 40 homeless resource centers were allowed in the CG General Commercial, D-2 Downtown Support, 41 and D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential districts; 42 WHEREAS, in order to further the goal that homeless resource centers and homeless shelters 43 be allowed in the city by some future date, the City Council desires to approve this ordinance that 44 would again allow for homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in the CG General 45 Commercial, D-2 Downtown Support, and D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential districts; 46 WHEREAS, in the event that the City Council identifies a preferred regulatory scheme that 47 allows for homeless shelters and/or homeless resource centers prior to the effective date of this 48 ordinance it intends to repeal this ordinance; LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 49 WHEREAS, Ordinance 15A was considered by the Salt Lake City Council (the “City 50 Council”) in conjunction with this Ordinance (No. 15B of 2022) and the City Council finds that 51 the two ordinances should be adopted simultaneously having differing effective dates and act as 52 a single transaction; and 53 WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after holding a public hearing on this matter, that 54 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 55 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 56 SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 57 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional 58 Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the 59 table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 60 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR 61 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS: USE CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Homeless Resource Center C21 Homeless Shelter C21 62 63 SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the 64 “Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: 65 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to add 66 the following text as qualifying provision “21” [Reserved] as follows: 67 Qualifying Provisions: 68 21. [Reserved] .Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.350 of this title. 69 SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 70 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional 71 Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the 72 table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 73 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN 74 DISTRICTS: USE D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Homeless Resource Center C15 C15 Homeless Shelter C15 C15 75 76 SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the 77 “Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use 78 Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is 79 amended to add the following text as qualifying provision “15” [Reserved] as follows: 80 81 Qualifying Provisions: 82 83 15. [Reserved]. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.350 of this title. 84 85 SECTION 5. Effective Date. Unless otherwise repealed, this Ordinance shall take effect on May 86 3, 2023. 87 88 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of 89 ______________, 2022. 90 ______________________________ 91 CHAIRPERSON 92 93 ATTEST: 94 95 ______________________________ 96 CITY RECORDER 97 98 99 Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 100 101 102 Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 103 104 105 106 ______________________________ 107 MAYOR LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 108 109 ______________________________ 110 CITY RECORDER 111 112 (SEAL) 113 114 Bill No. ________ of 2022. 115 Published: ______________. 116 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No.15B of 2022 (An ordinance amending Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to homeless resource center and homeless shelter uses) An ordinance amending Chapter 21A.33 (Land Use Tables) of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining homeless resource center and homeless shelter uses related to Petition No. PLNPCM2021- 01033 and pursuant to Ordinance No. 15A of 2022. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 15A of 2022 amended the land use tables prohibiting homeless shelters and homeless resource centers within the city with the intention of further studying how to thoughtfully, responsibly, and compassionately regulate the land uses; WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council (the “City Council”) has requested that the Mayor engage her professional staff to conduct outreach, study means and methods for regulating uses similar to homeless shelters and homeless resource centers, and bring back to the City Council at a future date a recommended proposal on how to regulate homeless shelters and homeless resource centers; WHEREAS, in accordance with Utah Code §10-9a-502 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 12, 2022 to consider the Mayor’s petition, Petition No. PLNPCM2021- 01033 and other considerations related to the regulations of homeless resource centers and homeless shelter land uses, and throughout the course of those discussions expressed concern over an outright prohibition of homeless shelters and homeless resources for an indefinite period of time and ultimately, elected to vote in favor of forwarding a negative recommendation because the Planning Commission was concerned there was no timetable established to replace the conditional use process; WHEREAS, the City Council shares the concern with the Planning Commission that a citywide prohibition on homeless resource centers and homeless shelters is not a desired outcome for the city long term but appreciates the need for the city to identify alternative means and methods for regulating the land uses and acknowledges the issue is complex and will take additional time; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to implement at a future date a regulatory scheme that allows for land uses similar to homeless shelters and homeless resource centers within the City subject to thoughtful, responsible, and compassionate regulation; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to receive from the city’s professional staff a recommended proposal on how to best regulate homeless shelters and homeless resource centers and/or similar uses; WHEREAS, the City Council requests that periodic updates regarding the proposal be presented to the City Council and that the city staff’s recommended proposal, accompanied by the Planning Commission’s recommendation on the proposal, be presented to the City Council no later than January 31, 2023. WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. 15A of 2022, homeless shelters and homeless resource centers were allowed in the CG General Commercial, D-2 Downtown Support, and D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential districts; WHEREAS, in order to further the goal that homeless resource centers and homeless shelters be allowed in the city by some future date, the City Council desires to approve this ordinance that would again allow for homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in the CG General Commercial, D-2 Downtown Support, and D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential districts; WHEREAS, in the event that the City Council identifies a preferred regulatory scheme that allows for homeless shelters and/or homeless resource centers prior to the effective date of this ordinance it intends to repeal this ordinance; WHEREAS, Ordinance 15A was considered by the Salt Lake City Council (the “City Council”) in conjunction with this Ordinance (No. 15B of 2022) and the City Council finds that the two ordinances should be adopted simultaneously having differing effective dates and act as a single transaction; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after holding a public hearing on this matter, that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS: USE CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Homeless Resource Center C21 Homeless Shelter C21 SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the “Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to add the following text as qualifying provision “21” [Reserved] as follows: Qualifying Provisions: 21. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.350 of this title. SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS: USE D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Homeless Resource Center C15 C15 Homeless Shelter C15 C15 SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the “Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to add the following text as qualifying provision “15” [Reserved] as follows: Qualifying Provisions: 15. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.350 of this title. SECTION 5. Effective Date. Unless otherwise repealed, this Ordinance shall take effect on May 3, 2023. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2022. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2022. Published: ______________. APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Hannah Vickery, Senior City Attorney 3/22/22 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. 15A of 2022 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to homeless resource center and homeless shelter text amendments) An ordinance amending various Sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to homeless resource center and homeless shelter text amendments pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-01033. WHEREAS, on October 4, 2021, Mayor Erin Mendenhall (the “Mayor”) initiated a petition, Petition No. PLNPCM2021-01033, to consider, among other things, a text amendment to the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit new future homeless shelters or homeless resources centers in all zoning districts in the city; WHEREAS, the Mayor initiated the petition pursuant to City ordinance, thereby, invoking the pending ordinance doctrine recognized by Utah Code Section 10-9a-509 to prohibit new homeless shelters and homeless resource centers in the city; WHEREAS, in accordance with Utah Code §10-9a-502, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on January 12, 2022 to consider the request initiated by the Mayor to amend the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit new homeless shelters and homeless resource centers within the city; WHEREAS, at the January 12th public hearing, the Planning Commission discussed amendments to the City’s land use regulations related to the homeless resource centers and homeless shelters, including whether to discontinue the allowance of homeless resource centers and homeless shelters as a conditional use in the city and the duration of such action, among other considerations; WHEREAS, at its January 12, 2022 hearing, the Planning Commission, expressing concern that there was no future plan for allowing homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in the city, voted to forward a negative recommendation on the proposal related to the petition before it; WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council (the “City Council”) desires, for the time being, to prohibit new homeless shelters and homeless resource centers while the city conducts outreach necessary to inform the City Council in its desire to allow the use in the future pursuant to new regulations and allow additional time for the city’s professional staff to study and discuss alternative means for regulating the historically challenging land uses; WHEREAS, the City Council expresses its intent to allow homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in the city in the future, and to further demonstrate the City Council’s intent the City Council finds that in the absence of a future new regulatory scheme that the City should amend Salt Lake City Code in a manner that would again allow homeless shelters and homeless resources in the CG General Commercial, D-2 Downtown Support, and D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential districts; WHEREAS, in order to authorize homeless shelters and homeless resources in the aforementioned zones the City Council would need to make various changes to the city code as further detailed in Ordinance No. 15B of 2022; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that adopting Ordinance No. 15B in conjunction with this Ordinance alleviates the concern that homeless resource centers and homeless shelters will be prohibited city wide for an indefinite period of time and provides for changes necessary to allow the land uses in the City in the absence of the creation of a new regulatory scheme; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that Ordinances No. 15A of 2022 and 15B of 2022 should be adopted simultaneously with differing effective dates and act as a single transaction; WHEREAS, the City Council hereby requests that the Mayor engage her professional staff to conduct outreach, study means and methods for regulating uses similar to homeless shelters and homeless resource centers, and propose to the City Council at a future date a recommendation on regulatory scheme for homeless shelters and homeless resource centers; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds, after holding a public hearing on this matter, that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.C. That Subsection 21A.33.010.C of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: C. Uses Not Permitted: Any use not specifically permitted or conditionally permitted in the table of permitted and conditional uses for the specific zoning district is prohibited. Only uses listed as a “P” or a “C” in the table of permitted and conditional uses for a district shall be allowed where designated. SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS: USE CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Homeless Resource Center Homeless Shelter SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the “Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to remove qualifying provision number “21” and designate qualifying provision 21 as “reserved” as follows: Qualifying Provisions: 21.[Reserved.] SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS: USE D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Homeless Resource Center Homeless Shelter SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the “Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to remove qualifying provision number “15” and designate qualifying provision 15 as “reserved” as follows: Qualifying Provisions: 15. [Reserved]. SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.36.350 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.36.350 REGULATIONS FOR HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTERS AND HOMELESS SHELTERS: A. A homeless resource center or homeless shelter located within the city shall comply with the following regulations. Any homeless resource center or homeless shelter approved as a conditional use shall comply with these regulations and the requirements of the approved conditional use. 1. Limit the number of homeless persons who may occupy a homeless resource center for overnight accommodations to a maximum of two hundred (200) homeless persons. a. Service provider staff shall not be included in this occupancy limit. b. No homeless resource center shall exceed the maximum occupancy for overnight accommodations for any reason, including on an overflow basis. 2. A security and operations plan shall be prepared by the applicant, and approved by the Salt Lake City Police Department and Community and Neighborhoods Department, prior to conditional use approval, and filed with the Recorder's Office. A security and operations plan shall include: a. A community relations and complaint response program that identifies specific strategies and methods designed to maintain the premises in a clean and orderly condition, minimize potential conflicts with the owners/operators and uses of neighboring property, and prohibit unlawful behavior by occupants of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter on the site or adjacent public right-of-way. The community relations and complaint response program shall include at least the following elements: (1) Identify a representative of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter, including the representative's name, telephone number, and email, who will meet with neighbors upon request to attempt to resolve any neighborhood complaints regarding operation of the center; (2) A dedicated twenty four (24) hour telephone line for the purpose of receiving complaints; (3) Quarterly meetings with a community coordinating group, which shall be open to the public, to discuss and address concerns and issues that may be occurring as a result of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter operation. The meetings shall be advertised at least ten (10) days in advance by posting notice on the operator's website and a sign posted along the public street; (4) Representatives from each of the following shall be included in the community coordinating group: (A) The homeless resource center or homeless shelter, (B) A business located within one-fourth (1/4) mile of the site, (C) A resident who lives within one-fourth (1/4) mile of the site, (D) A school, if any, located within one-fourth (1/4) mile of the site; (E) Chair of the community council, or designee, whose boundary encompasses the site; (F) An individual who has previously received or is currently receiving services (i.e., client) from a homeless resource center or homeless shelter; and (5) A written annual report, provided on or before February 15th of each year, from the operator of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter, provided to the City Planning Director and to the City Council member in whose district the homeless resource center or homeless shelter is located, which includes the following information: (A) List of individuals who have participated in the community coordinating group meetings; (B) A summary of each community coordinating group meeting; (C) A summary of complaints received from the community by the operator of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter; and (D) An explanation of how complaints have been addressed/resolved. b. A complaint response community relations program that includes strategies and methods designed to maintain the premises in a clean and orderly condition, minimize potential conflicts with the owners/operators and uses of neighboring property, and prohibit unlawful behavior by occupants of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter on the site or adjacent public right- of-way. c. A provision requiring a representative of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter to meet with neighbors upon request to attempt to resolve any neighborhood complaints regarding operation of the center; d. A provision requiring continuous on-site security and emergency services, which includes professional security personnel, monitored security cameras, trained emergency responders, and emergency alert systems. e. A plan to maintain noise levels in compliance with title 9, chapter 9.28 of this Code; f. Design requirements that ensure any areas for queuing take place within the footprint of the principal building and will not occur on any public street or sidewalk; g. Designation of a location for smoking tobacco outdoors in conformance with State laws; h. A provision stating that any trash strewn on the premises be collected and deposited in a trash receptacle by six o'clock (6:00) A.M. the following day, including any smoking and parking lot areas; i. A provision stating that portable trash receptacles on the premises be emptied daily and that other receptacles be emptied at a minimum of once per week or as needed. The owner of property on which a homeless resource center or homeless shelter is located shall ensure that the operator complies with the requirements of this subsection A2. 3. The applicant shall demonstrate how the building and site is designed to prevent crime based on the following principles. However, the Planning Commission may require modification of the proposed building and site plans if it determines that the plans do not sufficiently address each of these principles: a. Natural Surveillance: (1) The building includes windows and doors in sufficient quantities and locations that allow people inside the building to see all exterior areas of the site; (2) Lighting is sufficient to illuminate building site, entrances, and access points from public streets and sidewalks to the building; (A) Exterior public and private areas shall be illuminated at a minimum rating of one foot-candle, and parking lots shall be illuminated at a minimum rating of three (3) foot-candles. (B) Exterior lighting shall be shielded to control light pollution and prevent glare, and utilize light emitting diodes or metal-halide filaments. (3) Landscaping is arranged on the site in a manner that does not create hidden spaces or block sight lines between the building, public spaces, parking areas and landscaped areas. b. Natural Access Control: (1) Buildings include direct walkways from the public sidewalk to the primary building entrances; (2) Walkways are provided to guide people from the parking areas to primary building entrances; (3) Low growing landscape, low walls, curbing, or other means are used to guide pedestrians along walkways; (4) All walkways are properly illuminated and all illumination on the site is shielded to direct light down and away from neighboring properties; (5) Building entrances are clearly identified with universally accessible signs. c. Territorial Reinforcement: (1) Landscaped areas along the perimeter of the site, which are not visible from the building or public spaces, shall include mechanisms to restrict access outside daylight hours; (2) Parking areas are secured outside of daylight hours; (3) A decorative masonry wall that is a minimum of six feet (6') high shall be provided along all interior side and rear lot lines and that complies with all required site distance triangles at driveways and walkways. Walls in excess of six feet (6') may be required as a condition of approval of a conditional use if it determines a taller wall is necessary to mitigate a detrimental impact created by the homeless resource center or homeless shelter; (4) A fence no taller than three feet (3') high, and does not create a visible barrier, shall be placed near the front property line to mark the transition from public space to private space; (5) If the zoning district does not require a landscape buffer, the Planning Commission may nevertheless establish appropriate landscape buffering requirements as a condition of approval to mitigate reasonably anticipated detrimental effects of the proposed use. d. Maintenance: (1) The building and site are maintained free from graffiti, litter, garbage, and other items that constitute a nuisance; (2) The building is maintained in good repair and all property damage is repaired in a timely manner; (3) All fencing, walls, paving, walkways and other site features are maintained in good repair, and free from obstruction. e. Building And Zoning Compliance: A homeless resource center or homeless shelter shall comply with all applicable building and zoning regulations. SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Definitions of Terms) shall be and hereby is amended to modify the definition of “homeless resource center” and “homeless shelter” which shall read and appear as follows: HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER: An establishment in which co-located supportive services such as sleeping, bathing, eating, laundry facilities, and housing case management is provided on an emergency basis for individuals experiencing homelessness. Additional services may include preparation and distribution of food; medical care and treatment; behavioral and mental health counseling; employment counseling; educational instruction, and vocational training. HOMELESS SHELTER: An establishment in which sleeping accommodations are provided on an emergency basis for individuals experiencing homelessness. SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect April 1, 2022. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2022. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2022. Published: ______________. APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Hannah Vickery, Senior City Attorney 3/22/22 ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 10, 2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: PLNPCM2021-01033 Homeless Resource Center and Homeless Shelter Text Amendments STAFF CONTACT: Nick Norris, Planning Director, nick.norris@slcgov.com or 801-535-6173 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the recommendation from the Planning Commission to deny the proposal to prohibit homeless resource centers and homeless shelters by removing the uses from the land use tables in the CG, D2, and D3 zoning districts. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This proposal was initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall in October 2021. The initiation included three parts: 1. Prohibit new, future homeless shelters or homeless resources centers in all zoning districts in the city. 2. Modify the conditional use standards for homeless shelters or homeless resource centers, and 3. Distinguish between temporary overflow shelters and permanent shelters and homeless resources centers that operate year-round and potentially allow temporary overflow homeless shelters in certain zones. This transmittal only includes part 1. Parts 2 and 3 are in the engagement process and will be going to the Planning Commission in the coming months. They are not part of this proposal. Lisa Shaffer (Feb 11, 2022 12:02 MST)02/11/2022 02/11/2022 Part 1 would remove homeless resource centers and homeless shelters from the land use tables by deleting the “C” (indicating a use is a conditional use) in the land use tables for the CG General Commercial, D2 Downtown Support, and D3 Downtown/Warehouse Residential Zoning Districts. If approved, homeless resource centers and homeless shelters would not be allowed in any zoning districts in the city. The uses also include a footnote to a qualifying provision that follows each land use table. The footnote references a provision in Utah Code that has been removed from Utah Code by the Utah Legislature. The footnote would be deleted as part of this proposal. This proposal includes some changes to Zoning Ordinance section 21A.36.350. The purpose of these changes is to ensure that the existing regulations would apply to existing homeless resource centers. The current language says that it applies to conditional uses. If the conditional use is removed, then this wording needs to change so it would still apply. This section is likely to be modified during part 2 of this proposal. The City initiated the pending ordinance rule with this petition. The pending ordinance rule allows a city to hold any application for a homeless resource center or homeless shelter for a period of 180 days pending a change in city code. This applies to any application that is submitted starting on the day the petition is initiated. The petition was initiated on October 4, 2021. The 180-day period expires on April 2, 2022. If the proposal or a modified version of the proposal is adopted by April 2, 2022, any application that is submitted during the 180 period would be denied because a homeless resource center and homeless shelter would no longer be allowed. Alternatively, if a modified version is adopted, an application that complied with the modified version may be processed and an application that did not comply would be denied. If no changes are adopted by the 180-day deadline, the existing regulations go back into effect, and any open applications would be processed under the current regulations. In November 2021 the City Council adopted a motion that initiated a petition that asked the administration to review and come back with recommendations for “prohibiting temporary shelters until other jurisdictions in Salt Lake County permit them.” The initiation request from Mayor Mendenhall and this one from the City Council are directly related to what would be the same provisions in city code. Therefore, it is challenging to separate each request into a different proposal. This proposal (to remove the uses from the land use table) does accomplish the City Council request because it would prohibit any future shelter or resource center until such time as the City Council adopts new regulations for either permanent or temporary shelters. If this proposal is adopted, it does not prohibit the City Council from initiating temporary land use regulations but would prevent any other entity from submitting a conditional use for either a permanent or temporary/season shelter. PUBLIC PROCESS: The proposed changes were outlined in a public information document and made available to the public on November 16, 2021. A notice was sent to all registered, recognized community organizations via email on the same date. This started the 45-day public engagement period required by city code. The 45-day public engagement period ended on January 1, 2022. This date only identifies the end date of the 45-day engagement period and public input is still being accepted. During the 45-day period a group of community councils hosted a virtual public forum where the proposal was discussed, and people had the opportunity to ask questions. Information about the number of attendees has not been provided to the Planning Division as of the date of this transmittal. A transcript of the questions that were submitted through the Q/A function of the virtual meeting platform has also not been provided. The questions and comments submitted indicated a mixed level of support. Some people were in support of part 1 of the proposal, while others felt that removing the uses without a more solid proposal to allow the uses in the future was harmful to those experiencing homelessness. In the opinion of the Planning Division, most people supported the idea of updating the process and the regulations, but they don’t want to harm the people without homes, the service providers, or the surrounding community. Two written comments were submitted to the Planning Division prior to the production date of the staff report. The comments came from a group of community councils and from The Road Home. Those comments can be found in the Planning Commission staff report. The Planning Division also met with homeless service providers to discuss the proposal on January 4, 2022. The service providers are concerned that removing the uses jeopardizes their ability to take advantage of available resources that can help provide services and are concerned that changes to the regulations will make it more difficult for the providers to shelter the homeless. A summary of that meeting is also discussed in the Planning Commission staff report. On January 6th, the community hosted a similar community forum in Spanish. This forum was essentially the same as the one held on December 16th. The forum was moderated, and questions and answers were provided by a Spanish speaking staff member of the Community and Neighborhoods Department. A transcript has not been provided to the Planning Division, but similar questions and issues were raised during this forum as were raised in the December 16th forum. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 12, 2022. The public hearing was posted on the Planning Division website, the Utah Public Notice website, and shared through the Planning Division email listserv. No entities have requested mailed notice of this proposal and no mailed notice was provided. Service providers were provided with an email notice of the hearing. Written comments were provided to the Planning Commission and several people spoke during the public hearing. The comments were mixed and ranged from support for the proposal to opposition to the proposal. The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are linked in this document and provide a summary of the comments made. One underlying theme of the public comment was the need to act quickly to have an updated process to allow homeless resource centers in the city. Some encouraged the process to spread the uses throughout the city, while others supported the uses to be proximate to needed services. After the public hearing, the Planning Commission was also mixed on the proposal and debated the right direction to go. The Commission ended up adopting a motion to reject part one of the proposal, primarily because they were concerned there was no timeline established to replace the conditional use process. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of January 12, 2022 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of January 12, 2022 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of January 12, 2022 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3) Original Petition 4) Public Comment Received after Planning Commission Staff Report was Published SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2022 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to homeless resource center and homeless shelter text amendments) An ordinance amending various Sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to homeless resource center and homeless shelter text amendments pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-01033. WHEREAS, on October 4, 2021, Mayor Erin Mendenhall (the “Mayor”) initiated a petition, Petition No. PLNPCM2021-01033, to consider, among other things, a text amendment to the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit new future homeless shelters or homeless resources centers in all zoning districts in the city; WHEREAS, the Mayor initiated the petition pursuant to City ordinance, thereby, invoking the pending ordinance doctrine recognized by Utah Code Section 10-9a-509 to prohibit new homeless shelters and homeless resource centers in the city; WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on January 12, 2022 to consider the aforementioned portion of the request initiated by the Mayor to amend the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit new homeless shelters and homeless resource centers within the city; and WHEREAS, at its January 12, 2022 hearing, the Planning Commission voted to forward a negative recommendation on the proposal related to the petition before it; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires, for the time being, to prohibit new homeless shelters and homeless resource centers; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds, after holding a public hearing on this matter, that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.C. That Subsection 21A.33.010.C of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: C. Uses Not Permitted: Any use not specifically permitted or conditionally permitted in the table of permitted and conditional uses for the specific zoning district is prohibited. Only uses listed as a “P” or a “C” in the table of permitted and conditional uses for a district shall be allowed where designated. SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS: USE CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Homeless Resource Center Homeless Shelter SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the “Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to remove qualifying provision number “21” and designate qualifying provision 21 as “reserved” as follows: Qualifying Provisions: 21.[Reserved.] SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS: USE D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Homeless Resource Center Homeless Shelter SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the “Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to remove qualifying provision number “15” and designate qualifying provision 15 as “reserved” as follows: Qualifying Provisions: 15. [Reserved]. SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.350.A and the title of section 21A.36.350. That Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.350.A and the title of Section 21A.36.30 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.36.350: REGULATIONS FOR HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTERS AND HOMELESS SHELTERS: A. A homeless resource center or homeless shelter located within the city shall comply with the following regulations. Any homeless resource center or homeless shelter approved as a conditional use shall comply with these regulations and the requirements of the approved conditional use. SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Definitions of Terms) shall be and hereby is amended to modify the definition of “homeless resource center” and “homeless shelter” which shall read and appear as follows: HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER: An establishment in which co-located supportive services such as sleeping, bathing, eating, laundry facilities, and housing case management is provided on an emergency basis for individuals experiencing homelessness. Additional services may include preparation and distribution of food; medical care and treatment; behavioral and mental health counseling; employment counseling; educational instruction, and vocational training. HOMELESS SHELTER: An establishment in which sleeping accommodations are provided on an emergency basis for individuals experiencing homelessness. SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3- 713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2022. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2022. Published: ______________. 1/31/2022 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 1 No. _____ of 2022 2 3 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to 4 homeless resource center and homeless shelter text amendments) 5 6 An ordinance amending various Sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to 7 homeless resource center and homeless shelter text amendments pursuant to Petition No. 8 PLNPCM2021-01033. 9 WHEREAS, on October 4, 2021, Mayor Erin Mendenhall (the “Mayor”) initiated a 10 petition, Petition No. PLNPCM2021-01033, to consider, among other things, a text amendment to 11 the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit new future homeless shelters or homeless resources centers in all 12 zoning districts in the city; 13 WHEREAS, the Mayor initiated the petition pursuant to City ordinance, thereby, invoking 14 the pending ordinance doctrine recognized by Utah Code Section 10-9a-509 to prohibit new 15 homeless shelters and homeless resource centers in the city; 16 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held a 17 public hearing on January 12, 2022 to consider the aforementioned portion of the request initiated by 18 the Mayor to amend the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit new homeless shelters and homeless 19 resource centers within the city; and 20 WHEREAS, at its January 12, 2022 hearing, the Planning Commission voted to forward a 21 negative recommendation on the proposal related to the petition before it; and 22 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires, for the time being, to prohibit new 23 homeless shelters and homeless resource centers; and 24 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds, after holding a public hearing on this 25 matter, that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 26 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 27 SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.C. 28 That Subsection 21A.33.010.C of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to 29 read as follows: 30 C. Uses Not Permitted: Any use specifically listed without a "P" or a "C" designated in the table 31 of permitted and conditional uses for a district shall not be allowed in that zoning district. Any 32 use not specifically permitted or conditionally permitted in the table of permitted and conditional 33 uses for the specific zoning district is prohibited. Only uses listed as a “P” or a “C” in the table of 34 permitted and conditional uses for a district shall be allowed where designated. 35 SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 36 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional 37 Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the 38 table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 39 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR 40 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS: 41 USE CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Homeless Resource Center C21 Homeless Shelter C21 42 SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the 43 “Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: 44 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to 45 remove qualifying provision number “21” and designate qualifying provision 21 as “reserved” as follows: 46 Qualifying Provisions: 47 21. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.350 of this title, the City may 48 not prohibit construction of a homeless resource center or homeless shelter if the site is 49 approved by and receives funding through the State Homeless Coordinating Committee, with 50 the concurrence of the Housing and Community Development Division within the Department 51 of Workforce Services, in accordance with section 35A-8-604 of the Utah Code. 52 53 21.[Reserved.] 54 55 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 56 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional 57 Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the 58 table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 59 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN 60 DISTRICTS: 61 USE D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Homeless Resource Center C15 C15 Homeless Shelter C15 C15 62 SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the 63 “Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: 64 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to 65 remove qualifying provision number “15” and designate qualifying provision 15 as “reserved” as follows: 66 Qualifying Provisions: 67 15. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.350 of this title, the City may 68 not prohibit construction of a homeless resource center or homeless shelter if the site is 69 approved by and receives funding through the State Homeless Coordinating Committee, with 70 the concurrence of the Housing and Community Development Division within the Department 71 of Workforce Services, in accordance with section 35A-8-604 of the Utah Code. 72 73 15. [Reserved]. 74 75 SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.350.A 76 and the title of section 21A.36.350. That Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.350.A and 77 the title of Section 21A.36.30 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 78 21A.36.350: QUALIFYING PROVISIONS REGULATIONS FOR HOMELESS 79 RESOURCE CENTERS OR AND HOMELESS SHELTERS: 80 A. A homeless resource center or homeless shelter located within the city shall comply with the 81 following regulations. Any homeless resource center or homeless shelter approved as a 82 conditional use shall comply with these regulations and the requirements of the approved 83 conditional use. may be allowed as a conditional use, as identified in chapter 21A.33, "Land Use 84 Tables", of this title pursuant to the provisions of chapter 21A.54, "Conditional Uses", of this title 85 and the requirements of this section 86 87 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section 88 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Definitions of Terms) shall be and hereby is amended to modify 89 the definition of “homeless resource center” and “homeless shelter” which shall read and appear as 90 follows: 91 HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER: An establishment building or portion thereof in which co-92 located supportive services such as sleeping, bathing, eating, laundry facilities, and housing case 93 management is provided on an emergency basis for individuals experiencing homelessness. 94 Additional services may include preparation and distribution of food; medical care and 95 treatment; behavioral and mental health counseling; employment counseling; educational 96 instruction, and vocational training. 97 98 HOMELESS SHELTER: An establishment in which sleeping accommodations are provided on 99 an emergency basis for individuals experiencing homelessness. Any homeless shelter that began 100 operation on or before January 1, 2016, may operate year round in accordance with section 10-101 9a-526 of the Utah Code. 102 103 SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been 104 published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-105 713. 106 107 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of 108 ______________, 2022. 109 ______________________________ 110 CHAIRPERSON 111 112 ATTEST: 113 114 ______________________________ 115 CITY RECORDER 116 117 118 Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 119 120 121 Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 122 123 124 125 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT ______________________________ 126 MAYOR 127 128 ______________________________ 129 CITY RECORDER 130 131 (SEAL) 132 Bill No. ________ of 2022. 134 Published: ______________. 135 136 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. MAILING LIST 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2021-01033 October 4, 2021 Petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall. Notice of pending ordinance invoked by the city, starting 180-day decision making period. October 6, 2021 Internal meeting to discuss how to proceed with the proposal and what sections of the zoning code may be impacted. October 21, 2021 Internal meeting to discuss community engagement. October 26, 2021 Internal meeting to discuss expectations for this project. November 2, 2021 Internal meeting to review draft proposal. November 4, 2021 Internal meeting to discuss potential legal issues with the proposal. November 16, 2021 Notice and information sent to all recognized organizations starting the 45-day public engagement period. December 13, 2021 Presentation to Sugar House Community Council Land Use Committee December 16, 2021 Virtual community forum hosted by recognized organizations. December 29, 2021 Public notice for January 12, 2022 Planning Commission public hearing sent to Division list serve, posted on city website, and posted on Utah Public Meeting website. Property posted with sign advertising public hearing. January 3, 2022 Meeting with service providers to discuss the proposal. January 6, 2022 Virtual community forum hosted by recognized organizations held in Spanish. January 12, 2022 Planning Commission public hearing. 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition P:NPCM2021-01033 – A petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Code by removing Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters as conditional uses from the land use tables for the CG General Commercial, D-2 Downtown Support, and D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential Zoning Districts, modifying 21A.33.010 to clarify when listed land uses are prohibited, modifying the applicability section of 21A.36.350 Qualifying Provisions for Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters, and modifying the definitions of homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in 21A.62. The City Council may consider modifications to other related sections of the code as part of this proposal. DATE: Date #1 and Date #2 TIME: 7:00 p.m. All persons interested and present will be given an opportunity to be heard in this matter. This meeting will be held via electronic means, while potentially also providing for an in- person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. If you are interested in participating during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting, please visit the website www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings/ or call 801-535-7654 to obtain connection information. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Nick Norris at 801-535-6173 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at nick.norris@slcgov.com People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PUBLISHED LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. 15A of 2022 3 4 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to 5 homeless resource center and homeless shelter text amendments) 6 7 An ordinance amending various Sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to 8 homeless resource center and homeless shelter text amendments pursuant to Petition No. 9 PLNPCM2021-01033. 10 WHEREAS, on October 4, 2021, Mayor Erin Mendenhall (the “Mayor”) initiated a 11 petition, Petition No. PLNPCM2021-01033, to consider, among other things, a text amendment to 12 the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit new future homeless shelters or homeless resources centers in all 13 zoning districts in the city; 14 WHEREAS, the Mayor initiated the petition pursuant to City ordinance, thereby, invoking 15 the pending ordinance doctrine recognized by Utah Code Section 10-9a-509 to prohibit new 16 homeless shelters and homeless resource centers in the city; 17 WHEREAS, in accordance with Utah Code §10-9a-502, the Salt Lake City Planning 18 Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on January 12, 2022 to consider the 19 request initiated by the Mayor to amend the Salt Lake City Code to prohibit new homeless shelters 20 and homeless resource centers within the city; 21 WHEREAS, at the January 12th public hearing, the Planning Commission discussed 22 amendments to the City’s land use regulations related to the homeless resource centers and homeless 23 shelters, including whether to discontinue the allowance of homeless resource centers and homeless 24 shelters as a conditional use in the city and the duration of such action, among other considerations; 25 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 26 WHEREAS, at its January 12, 2022 hearing, the Planning Commission, expressing 27 concern that there was no future plan for allowing homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in 28 the city, voted to forward a negative recommendation on the proposal related to the petition before it; 29 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council (the “City Council”) desires, for the time being, 30 to prohibit new homeless shelters and homeless resource centers while the city conducts outreach 31 necessary to inform the City Council in its desire to allow the use in the future pursuant to new 32 regulations and allow additional time for the city’s professional staff to study and discuss 33 alternative means for regulating the historically challenging land uses; 34 WHEREAS, the City Council expresses its intent to allow homeless resource centers and 35 homeless shelters in the city in the future, and to further demonstrate the City Council’s intent 36 the City Council finds that in the absence of a future new regulatory scheme that the City should 37 amend Salt Lake City Code in a manner that would again allow homeless shelters and homeless 38 resources in the CG General Commercial, D-2 Downtown Support, and D-3 Downtown 39 Warehouse/Residential districts; 40 WHEREAS, in order to authorize homeless shelters and homeless resources in the 41 aforementioned zones the City Council would need to make various changes to the city code as 42 further detailed in Ordinance No. 15B of 2022; 43 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that adopting Ordinance No. 15B in conjunction with 44 this Ordinance alleviates the concern that homeless resource centers and homeless shelters will 45 be prohibited city wide for an indefinite period of time and provides for changes necessary to 46 allow the land uses in the City in the absence of the creation of a new regulatory scheme; 47 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that Ordinances No. 15A of 2022 and 15B of 2022 48 should be adopted simultaneously with differing effective dates and act as a single transaction; LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 49 WHEREAS, the City Council hereby requests that the Mayor engage her professional staff to 50 conduct outreach, study means and methods for regulating uses similar to homeless shelters and 51 homeless resource centers, and propose to the City Council at a future date a recommendation on 52 regulatory scheme for homeless shelters and homeless resource centers; and 53 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds, after holding a public hearing on this 54 matter, that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 55 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 56 SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.C. 57 That Subsection 21A.33.010.C of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to 58 read as follows: 59 C. Uses Not Permitted: Any use specifically listed without a "P" or a "C" designated in the table 60 of permitted and conditional uses for a district shall not be allowed in that zoning district. Any 61 use not specifically permitted or conditionally permitted in the table of permitted and conditional 62 uses for the specific zoning district is prohibited. Only uses listed as a “P” or a “C” in the table of 63 permitted and conditional uses for a district shall be allowed where designated. 64 SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 65 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional 66 Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the 67 table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 68 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR 69 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS: USE CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Homeless Resource Center C21 Homeless Shelter C21 70 71 SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the 72 “Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: 73 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to 74 remove qualifying provision number “21” and designate qualifying provision 21 as “reserved” as follows: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 75 Qualifying Provisions: 76 21. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.350 of this title, the City may 77 not prohibit construction of a homeless resource center or homeless shelter if the site is 78 approved by and receives funding through the State Homeless Coordinating Committee, with 79 the concurrence of the Housing and Community Development Division within the Department 80 of Workforce Services, in accordance with section 35A-8-604 of the Utah Code. 81 82 21.[Reserved.] 83 84 SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 85 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional 86 Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the following rows in the 87 table which shall read and appear in that table as follows: 88 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN 89 DISTRICTS: USE D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Homeless Resource Center C15 C15 Homeless Shelter C15 C15 90 91 SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the 92 “Qualifying Provisions:” of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: 93 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to 94 remove qualifying provision number “15” and designate qualifying provision 15 as “reserved” as follows: 95 Qualifying Provisions: 96 15. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.350 of this title, the City may 97 not prohibit construction of a homeless resource center or homeless shelter if the site is 98 approved by and receives funding through the State Homeless Coordinating Committee, with 99 the concurrence of the Housing and Community Development Division within the Department 100 of Workforce Services, in accordance with section 35A-8-604 of the Utah Code. 101 102 15. [Reserved]. 103 104 SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.36.350. That 105 Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.36.350 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 106 21A.36.350: QUALIFYING PROVISIONS REGULATIONS FOR HOMELESS 107 RESOURCE CENTERS OR AND HOMELESS SHELTERS: 108 A. A homeless resource center or homeless shelter located within the city shall comply with the 109 following regulations. Any homeless resource center or homeless shelter approved as a LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 110 conditional use shall comply with these regulations and the requirements of the approved 111 conditional use. may be allowed as a conditional use, as identified in chapter 21A.33, "Land Use 112 Tables", of this title pursuant to the provisions of chapter 21A.54, "Conditional Uses", of this title 113 and the requirements of this section 114 1. Limit the number of homeless persons who may occupy a homeless resource center for 115 overnight accommodations to a maximum of two hundred (200) homeless persons. 116 a. Service provider staff shall not be included in this occupancy limit. 117 b. No homeless resource center shall exceed the maximum occupancy for overnight 118 accommodations for any reason, including on an overflow basis. 119 2. A security and operations plan shall be prepared by the applicant, and approved by the 120 Salt Lake City Police Department and Community and Neighborhoods Department, prior to 121 conditional use approval, and filed with the Recorder's Office. A security and operations plan 122 shall include: 123 a. A community relations and complaint response program that identifies specific 124 strategies and methods designed to maintain the premises in a clean and orderly condition, 125 minimize potential conflicts with the owners/operators and uses of neighboring property, and 126 prohibit unlawful behavior by occupants of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter on 127 the site or adjacent public right-of-way. The community relations and complaint response 128 program shall include at least the following elements: 129 (1) Identify a representative of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter, 130 including the representative's name, telephone number, and email, who will meet with neighbors 131 upon request to attempt to resolve any neighborhood complaints regarding operation of the 132 center; 133 (2) A dedicated twenty four (24) hour telephone line for the purpose of receiving 134 complaints; 135 (3) Quarterly meetings with a community coordinating group, which shall be open to the 136 public, to discuss and address concerns and issues that may be occurring as a result of the 137 homeless resource center or homeless shelter operation. The meetings shall be advertised at least 138 ten (10) days in advance by posting notice on the operator's website and a sign posted along the 139 public street; 140 (4) Representatives from each of the following shall be included in the community 141 coordinating group: 142 (A) The homeless resource center or homeless shelter, 143 (B) A business located within one-fourth (1/4) mile of the site, 144 (C) A resident who lives within one-fourth (1/4) mile of the site, 145 (D) A school, if any, located within one-fourth (1/4) mile of the site; 146 (E) Chair of the community council, or designee, whose boundary encompasses the 147 site; 148 (F) An individual who has previously received or is currently receiving services (i.e., 149 client) from a homeless resource center or homeless shelter; and 150 (5) A written annual report, provided on or before February 15th of each year, from the 151 operator of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter, provided to the City Planning 152 Director and to the City Council member in whose district the homeless resource center or 153 homeless shelter is located, which includes the following information: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 154 (A) List of individuals who have participated in the community coordinating group 155 meetings; 156 (B) A summary of each community coordinating group meeting; 157 (C) A summary of complaints received from the community by the operator of the 158 homeless resource center or homeless shelter; and 159 (D) An explanation of how complaints have been addressed/resolved. 160 b. A complaint response community relations program that includes strategies and 161 methods designed to maintain the premises in a clean and orderly condition, minimize potential 162 conflicts with the owners/operators and uses of neighboring property, and prohibit unlawful 163 behavior by occupants of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter on the site or adjacent 164 public right- of-way. 165 c. A provision requiring a representative of the homeless resource center or homeless 166 shelter to meet with neighbors upon request to attempt to resolve any neighborhood complaints 167 regarding operation of the center; 168 d. A provision requiring continuous on-site security and emergency services, which 169 includes professional security personnel, monitored security cameras, trained emergency 170 responders, and emergency alert systems. 171 e. A plan to maintain noise levels in compliance with title 9, chapter 9.28 of this Code; 172 f. Design requirements that ensure any areas for queuing take place within the footprint of 173 the principal building and will not occur on any public street or sidewalk; 174 g. Designation of a location for smoking tobacco outdoors in conformance with State 175 laws; 176 h. A provision stating that any trash strewn on the premises be collected and deposited in 177 a trash receptacle by six o'clock (6:00) A.M. the following day, including any smoking and 178 parking lot areas; 179 i. A provision stating that portable trash receptacles on the premises be emptied daily and 180 that other receptacles be emptied at a minimum of once per week or as needed. 181 The owner of property on which a homeless resource center or homeless shelter is located shall 182 ensure that the operator complies with the requirements of this subsection A2. 183 3. The applicant shall demonstrate how the building and site is designed to prevent crime 184 based on the following principles. However, the Planning Commission may require modification 185 of the proposed building and site plans if it determines that the plans do not sufficiently address 186 each of these principles: 187 a. Natural Surveillance: 188 (1) The building includes windows and doors in sufficient quantities and locations that 189 allow people inside the building to see all exterior areas of the site; 190 (2) Lighting is sufficient to illuminate building site, entrances, and access points from 191 public streets and sidewalks to the building; 192 (A) Exterior public and private areas shall be illuminated at a minimum rating of one 193 foot-candle, and parking lots shall be illuminated at a minimum rating of three (3) foot-candles. 194 (B) Exterior lighting shall be shielded to control light pollution and prevent glare, and 195 utilize light emitting diodes or metal-halide filaments. 196 (3) Landscaping is arranged on the site in a manner that does not create hidden spaces or 197 block sight lines between the building, public spaces, parking areas and landscaped areas. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 198 b. Natural Access Control: 199 (1) Buildings include direct walkways from the public sidewalk to the primary building 200 entrances; 201 (2) Walkways are provided to guide people from the parking areas to primary building 202 entrances; 203 (3) Low growing landscape, low walls, curbing, or other means are used to guide 204 pedestrians along walkways; 205 (4) All walkways are properly illuminated and all illumination on the site is shielded to 206 direct light down and away from neighboring properties; 207 (5) Building entrances are clearly identified with universally accessible signs. 208 c. Territorial Reinforcement: 209 (1) Landscaped areas along the perimeter of the site, which are not visible from the 210 building or public spaces, shall include mechanisms to restrict access outside daylight hours; 211 (2) Parking areas are secured outside of daylight hours; 212 (3) A decorative masonry wall that is a minimum of six feet (6') high shall be provided 213 along all interior side and rear lot lines and that complies with all required site distance triangles 214 at driveways and walkways. Walls in excess of six feet (6') may be required as a condition of 215 approval of a conditional use if it determines a taller wall is necessary to mitigate a detrimental 216 impact created by the homeless resource center or homeless shelter; 217 (4) A fence no taller than three feet (3') high, and does not create a visible barrier, shall 218 be placed near the front property line to mark the transition from public space to private space; 219 (5) If the zoning district does not require a landscape buffer, the Planning Commission 220 may nevertheless establish appropriate landscape buffering requirements as a condition of 221 approval to mitigate reasonably anticipated detrimental effects of the proposed use. 222 d. Maintenance: 223 (1) The building and site are maintained free from graffiti, litter, garbage, and other 224 items that constitute a nuisance; 225 (2) The building is maintained in good repair and all property damage is repaired in a 226 timely manner; 227 (3) All fencing, walls, paving, walkways and other site features are maintained in good 228 repair, and free from obstruction. 229 e. Building And Zoning Compliance: A homeless resource center or homeless shelter shall comply 230 with all applicable building and zoning regulations. 231 SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section 232 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Definitions of Terms) shall be and hereby is amended to modify 233 the definition of “homeless resource center” and “homeless shelter” which shall read and appear as 234 follows: 235 HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER: An establishment building or portion thereof in which co- 236 located supportive services such as sleeping, bathing, eating, laundry facilities, and housing case 237 management is provided on an emergency basis for individuals experiencing homelessness. 238 Additional services may include preparation and distribution of food; medical care and LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 239 treatment; behavioral and mental health counseling; employment counseling; educational 240 instruction, and vocational training. 241 242 HOMELESS SHELTER: An establishment building or portion thereof in which sleeping 243 accommodations are provided on an emergency basis for individuals experiencing 244 homelessness. Any homeless shelter that began operation on or before January 1, 2016, may 245 operate year round in accordance with section 10-9a-526 of the Utah Code. 246 247 SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on April 1, 2022. 248 249 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of 250 ______________, 2022. 251 ______________________________ 252 CHAIRPERSON 253 254 ATTEST: 255 256 ______________________________ 257 CITY RECORDER 258 259 260 Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 261 262 263 Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 264 265 266 267 ______________________________ 268 MAYOR 269 270 ______________________________ 271 CITY RECORDER 272 273 (SEAL) 274 275 Bill No. ________ of 2022. 276 Published: ______________. 277 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:March 22, 2022 RE: Stealth Wireless Facilities Zoning Text Amendment PLNPCM2020-00284 The Council will be briefed about a request from Cellco Partnership (dba Verizon Wireless) to amend the Salt Lake City zoning ordinance to allow stealth cellular towers up to 75 feet tall as a conditional use in the Public Lands (PL) zoning district citywide. Stealth towers are currently limited to 35 feet in height and are allowed in all zoning districts provided they are “completely disguised as another object concealed from view thereby concealing the intended use and appearance of the facility” (Chapter 21A.40.090.E Salt Lake City Code). To qualify as a stealth facility, a tower needs to meet the following requirements: 1. “Conform with the dimensions of the object it is being disguised as,” 2. “Be in concert with its surroundings,” and 3. Meet “the provisions contained in section 21A.36.020, [including] tables 21A.36.020.B and 21A.36.020.C.” Chapter 21A.36.020.C regulates lot and bulk controls requiring lots and structures meet “the lot area, lot width, yards, building height and other requirements established in the applicable district regulations.” Exceptions are allowed for height, and certain obstructions in a required yard. Height exceptions for church steeples, elevator/stairwell bulkheads, flagpoles, and light poles for sports fields are allowed. Wireless facilities disguised as trees, or another object not listed in the height exception table are not permitted obstructions beyond the maximum height of a zoning district. The request is associated with the applicant’s proposal to construct a stealth cell tower at the Pioneer Police Precinct located at 1040 West 700 South, but the requested text amendment would apply to all properties within the PL zoning designation citywide. Item Schedule: Briefing: March 22, 2022 Set Date: March 22, 2022 Public Hearing: April 5, 2022 Potential Action: April 19, 2022 Page | 2 The applicant first proposed constructing an 80-foot stealth wireless facility disguised as an evergreen tree (known as a “monopine”) at the Pioneer Police Precinct. Planning staff told the applicant non-government structures in the PL zone were limited to 35 feet and the request for an 80-foot tower would be denied. The proposal was then modified to allow stealth cell towers up to 60 feet tall in all zoning districts within the city. After reviewing the Planning staff report and receiving community feedback, the applicant asked for additional time to review their proposal, as well as Planning staff and community concerns. The current proposal is to allow stealth wireless facilities up to 75 feet in the PL zoning district. PL properties are located throughout the city and are often located near smaller-scale neighborhoods consisting of single- and two-family, or small commercial districts such as Neighborhood Commercial shown in the image below. Uses in the PL zone are typically government owned or operated facilities including schools, libraries, and fire stations. These zoning districts generally limit building height to 30 feet or less. Image courtesy Salt Lake City Planning Division Page | 3 Planning staff provided the following image comparing the proposed 75-foot height of stealth towers in the PL zoning district to building heights in a variety of adjacent zoning districts. Image courtesy Salt Lake City Planning Division The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal at its December 8, 2021 meeting and held a public hearing. There was one comment at the hearing expressing concern about potential radiation near schools, and stated the proposed tower was not in concert with the area. Planning staff noted there were letters to the Commission from the East Liberty Park Community Organization and Yalecrest Community Council (both opposed). The Commission voted 5-0 to forward a negative recommendation to the City Council. One Commissioner abstained but did not say why. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. The Council may wish to discuss more how a tower is determined to be “in concert with the surroundings.” 2. The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether there would be requirements such as setbacks or step backs to mitigate impact to adjacent properties. 3. The Council may wish to consider whether there is interest in limiting stealth towers in small neighborhood pocket-parks, and if so, ask whether there could be some minimal parcel size associated with applications. 4. Is the Council supportive of the proposed zoning map amendment? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Planning staff provided the following comparison of existing and proposed stealth wireless facility standards. EXISTING REGULATIONS PROPOSED CHANGES Definition of “Stealth Antenna”: An antenna completely disguised as another object, or otherwise concealed from view, thereby concealing the intended use and appearance No change Page | 4 of the facility. Examples of stealth facilities include, but are not limited to, flagpoles, light pole standards, or architectural elements such as dormers, steeples, and chimneys. Criteria for determining if an antenna is “stealth”: The antenna must conform to the dimensions of the object it is being disguised as. The location of the stealth facility must be in concert with its surroundings No change The height of stealth antennas is limited to the maximum building height of the underlying zoning district unless they are disguised as the following: Chimney-can extend above the maximum height limit of the zone only the amount that is required to meet building regulations. Church steeples or spires - no height limit Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead - can extend up to 16 feet above the maximum height limit in the commercial, manufacturing, downtown, FB-UN2, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RP, BP, I, UI A, PL, and PL-2 districts. Flagpole - may apply for conditional use approval to exceed the maximum building height of the zone. Light poles for sports fields - allowed up to 90 feet or higher with special exception approval. Stealth antennas in the PL Public Lands Zoning District taller than 35 feet (up to 75 feet in height) would require Conditional Use approval from the Planning Commission. All other stealth towers that meet the existing dimension regulations would still be allowed by-right. Stealth Antennas are allowed in all zoning districts, subject to the dimensions mentioned above. Conditional Use approval would be required for stealth antennas taller than 35 feet (up to 75 feet in height) in the PL Public Lands District. Planning staff identified six key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 5-7 of the Planning Commission staff report. They are summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the staff report. Consideration 1-Rationale for Denial Recommendation The following issues regarding the proposed ordinance were found by Planning staff: 1. Standards would not result in predictable outcomes. The regulations would allow any type of stealth facility, not only “monopines.” An applicant could request a stealth facility out of character with the surrounding area such as an elevator bulkhead (see consideration 2 below). 2. The PL District is generally located within neighborhoods with shorter maximum heights. Towers as tall as 75 feet could be out of scale with the neighborhoods. 3. Requiring conditional use approval for these towers would require additional Planning staff and Planning Commission time and resources. Utah State Code makes denying conditional use applications challenging. 4. Proposed language is difficult to interpret (see consideration 6 below). Planning staff noted the following: The ordinance already allows stealth cellular facilities in many other contexts in every zoning district, and State Code requires the city to approve small cell facilities in the public right of way. The proposed text amendment is a response to the denial of the proposed facility at the Pioneer Police Precinct. It does not include a thorough analysis of community needs, potential adverse impacts, or unintended consequences. Page | 5 Consideration 2-Compatibility with Current City Plans, Policies, and Zoning Standards Current City Code allows stealth wireless facilities taller than the maximum height in a zoning district if they are disguised as a structure or object already allowed to do so (e.g., church steeple, chimney, elevator or stairway or bulkhead). Planning staff found reliance on conditional use standards to mitigate potential impacts of stealth facilities in the PL Zone may not offer protections to residents from adverse effects of future stealth towers. They further found the proposal does not further objectives within the City’s adopted plans and policies. Planning staff noted three factors to evaluate when analyzing stealth wireless facilities’ compatibility with current City plans, policies, and zoning standards. 1. Neighborhood Character – most neighborhood plans focus on neighborhood character and impact of future development. Stealth towers can be a desirable alternative to traditional wireless antennas within established neighborhoods. Limiting stealth towers to the PL zoning district may be a method of installing necessary wireless infrastructure consistent with neighborhood plans. However, the proposal relies on conditional use standards when considering neighborhood character. 2. Views of Landscapes and Distinctive Urban Features – Plan Salt Lake, the Central City and East Bench neighborhood plans, along with the Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay all discuss preservation of viewsheds within the city. Impact to viewsheds should be considered when new wireless facilities are being established. Under the proposed amendment, it is unclear to what extent the requirement to “be in concert with its surroundings” would enable prevention of a stealth tower installation within an established view corridor. 3. Equitable Access to Cellular Services – Plan Salt Lake discusses the necessity of cell service access. The Planning Commission staff report states: If a cell provider is unable to get coverage in a low-income neighborhood because current regulations prevent it, does the City have a responsibility to provide opportunities to expand that coverage into marginalized communities? This is an important question when reviewing zoning regulations for privately provided infrastructure. Planning staff notes the applicant’s maps (found on pages 63-65 of the Planning Commission staff report) demonstrates a need for improved cell service near the proposed tower at the Pioneer Police Precinct. However, Planning found the applicant did not indicate how allowing towers up to the proposed height will improve equitable cellular access in other parts of the city. The Planning Commission staff report stated: Because the applicant has not provided an analysis to support this request, staff cannot determine if the proposed amendment is compatible with the adopted plans and policies of the City. The above discussion and the analysis in Attachment D [pages 36-41] show that the applicant has not provided enough information to determine the long-term impacts of their proposal. Consideration 3–Best Practices for Zoning Ordinance Revisions It is Planning staff’s opinion best practices for zoning ordinance revisions include a holistic approach and response to community needs and concerns. They found the proposed text amendment is responding to standards preventing one project at one location. An analysis of long-term effects of the proposal was not provided by the applicant. Planning stated: With this piecemeal approach that lacks at least a surface-level analysis of impacts, Staff cannot provide any information on any potential long-term effects this proposal may have on stealth Page | 6 facilities within the City. Attempting to circumvent existing regulations by modifying them without appropriate analysis of impacts is not the best practice for revising a zoning ordinance. Consideration 4 – Conditional Uses Utah State Code requires conditional use approval if reasonable conditions mitigate anticipated detrimental impacts. Planning staff noted under the proposed text amendment, each case would need to be presented to the Planning Commission and would utilize additional Planning staff and Planning Commission resources. They also discussed the potential of establishing false community expectations a stealth antenna application could be denied based on neighborhood input. Consideration 5 – Federal Regulations Regarding Wireless Communication Facilities Federal rules limit the City’s ability to regulate wireless facilities to only location, aesthetics, and structural safety. Decisions cannot be made based on health concerns or environmental effects of radio frequency emissions. Consideration 6 – Clarity of Proposed Amendment Language Planning staff noted existing language in City Code is vague and there have been issues interpreting it. They believe the proposed language would be more challenging to interpret without additional clarification. ZONING STANDARDS ANALYSIS Attachment D (pages 36-41) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Mixed finding. The proposed amendment is either partially, or not consistent with the goals and policies of applicable master plans. Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Mixed finding. The proposal either furthers or partially furthers the applicable purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. The proposed amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of all relevant overlay districts. Page | 7 The extent to which a proposed text amendment implements the best current, professional practices of urban planning and design. The proposed amendment does not implement the best current urban planning and design practices. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Attachment G (page 136 of the Planning Commission staff report) contains a list of City departments that reviewed the proposed text amendment and associated comments, which are included below. Engineering: “My understanding is that the proposed stealth towers are not small cell wireless facilities and would only occur on private property.” The Attorney’s Office “does not recommend considering changes to the height of stealth antenna section of City Code without a more comprehensive look at all of the Chapter 21A zoning sections.” Zoning: “Current code allows for flag poles to reach 60’ in height with a conditional use. Church steeples/spires have no height limit. Light poles for sports fields can reach 90’ by right and taller with a Special Exception. Any stealth antenna facility disguised as one of those three could exceed the height limit of the underlying zoning district. The assertation that the code as currently written does not allow for stealth poles to exceed the maximum height of the underlying zoning district is inaccurate. The proposed text amendment would allow all stealth facilities (not just the monopines) to exceed the height limit of the underlying zoning district. If the intent is to allow just monopines to be 60’, then the text amendments concerning height should be specifically for monopines rather than all stealth facilities.” Urban Forestry: “Salt Lake City does have trees that are greater than 60’ tall, and some even pushing 100’. However, the average tree height in our City is probably closer to 30’ than 60’. Perhaps even more concerning (to me) is where these towers will be located. If the intention is to place them within City R.O.W. (on City park strips) then we have the added issue of the towers taking away valuable tree planting space. It would be worse still if somehow it was permissible to actually remove (or drastically prune) existing city trees to accommodate these towers. But please note that (in the interest of maximizing the potential of Salt Lake City to grow trees, on its public property) the Urban Forestry Division is very opposed to the loss of existing tree ‘planting locations’ just as we are opposed to the loss of existing trees.” Other responding City departments (Transportation, Public Utilities, Building Services/Building Services (Fire)) had no concerns with the proposal. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • September 2, 2021-Application submitted in current form. • May 14, 2020-Petition assigned to Aaron Barlow, Principal Planner (note: previous version of the application was assigned to the planner this date). • October 5, 2021-Information about petition sent to all Salt Lake City recognized community organizations. The Sugar House, Greater Avenues, and Yalecrest Councils invited the applicant and Planning staff to attend their meetings. The Sugar House, East Liberty Park, Yalecrest and Page | 8 Greater Avenues councils sent letters to Planning opposing the proposal. • October 5, 2021- Proposal posted for online open house through December 1, 2021. • November 22, 2021-Sent to Planning Commission. • December 8, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing. There was one comment at the public hearing in opposition to proposal. The Commission voted 5-0 to forward a negative recommendation to the City Council, with one Commissioner abstaining. • February 8, 2022-Transmitted to City Council. • Note-Because the proposal was forwarded to the Council with a negative recommendation it was not sent to the Attorney’s Office for an ordinance to be drafted. CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING // MARCH 22, 2022 STEALTH WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLNPCM2020-00284 A Zoning Text Amendment request to allow Stealth Wireless Telecommunication Facilities between 35 and 75 feet tall in the PL Public Lands Zoning District by Conditional Use. •On December 8,2021,the Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation to the City Council. •Planning staff also recommended denial PROJECT REQUEST Salt Lake City // Planning Division Definition:An antenna completely disguised as another object,or otherwise concealed from view,to hide the intended use and appearance of the facility. A stealth tower must: 1.Conform with the dimensions of the intended disguise 2.Be in concert with its surroundings *Stealth Towers are currently permitted in all districts if they meet the standards for a given district (i.e.,setback and height). Salt Lake City // Planning Division STEALTH TOWERS •Individual lots or small clusters •Integrated with other districts •Uses generally limited to public facilities •Schools,Libraries,Fire Stations Salt Lake City // Planning Division PL PUBLIC LANDS ZONING DISTRICT Salt Lake City // Planning Division HEIGHT COMPARISON *This monopine example is for illustrative purposes only.Under this request,other types of stealth towers (like those illustrated in this presentation)could be permitted. * •On December 8,2021,the Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation to the City Council. •Planning staff also recommended denial Salt Lake City // Planning Division RECOMMENDATIONS •Unpredictable Outcomes •Out of scale with surrounding development •Challenges with Conditional Uses •Community expectation of denial •Confusing proposal language •Proposal is not comprehensive Salt Lake City // Planning Division STAFF RATIONALE FOR DENIAL QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS Salt Lake City // Planning Division Aaron Barlow // Principal Planner aaron.barlow@slcgov.com ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 1, 2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2020-00284 - Request to Allow Stealth Wireless Telecommunication Facilities taller than 35 feet (up to 75 feet) in height within the PL – Public Lands Zoning District STAFF CONTACT: Aaron Barlow, Principal Planner 801-535-6182, aaron.barlow@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council deny the request to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance to allow Stealth Wireless Telecommunication Facilities taller than 35 feet (up to 75 feet) in height within the PL – Public Lands Zoning District. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Pete Simmons of Cellco Partnership (dba Verizon Wireless) submitted a request to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance to allow Stealth cellular towers up to 75 feet in height as a Conditional Use in the PL Public Lands Zoning District. Stealth facilities are currently limited to 35 feet in height. This request is specifically related to a proposal by the applicant to construct a stealth cellular tower at the Pioneer Police Precinct at 1040 West 700 South, but the proposed text amendment would apply to properties within the PL district citywide. Under current regulations in Section 21A.40.090.E of the Zoning Ordinance, stealth wireless facilities are permitted in all zoning districts provided they are “completely disguised as another object concealed from view thereby concealing the intended use and appearance of the facility.” To qualify as a stealth facility, a tower needs to do the following: 1. “Conform with the dimensions of the object it is being disguised as,” 2. “Be in concert with its surroundings,” and Lisa Shaffer (Feb 2, 2022 14:42 MST)02/02/2022 02/02/2022 Page 2 of 3 3. Meet “the provisions contained in section 21A.36.020, [including] tables 21A.36.020.B and 21A.36.020.C.” Section 21A.36.020 of the Zoning Ordinance regulates lot and bulk controls. It requires that all lots and structures must meet “the lot area, lot width, yards, building height and other requirements established in the applicable district regulations.” Exceptions are allowed for certain obstructions in a required yard (table 21A.36.020.B) and height (table 21A.36.020.C). Allowed height exceptions include church steeples, elevator/stairwell bulkheads, flagpoles, and light poles for sports fields. Wireless facilities disguised as trees (or anything else not listed in the height exceptions table) are not a permitted obstruction beyond the maximum height of a zoning district. In response to the perceived limitations that the Zoning Ordinance placed on stealth wireless communication facilities, the applicant submitted a text amendment application to modify sections 21A.32.070 (PL Public Lands District) and 21A.40.090.E (Wireless Telecommunication Facilities) of the City’s zoning regulations to allow stand-alone stealth cell towers up to 75 feet tall as a Conditional Use in only the PL Public Lands Zoning District. At their meeting on December 8, 2021, the Planning Commission voted to send a negative recommendation to the City Council regarding this proposal because it did not meet the standards for a zoning text amendment. Specifically, they provided a negative recommendation because the proposal would also impact residential districts adjacent to properties within the PL district, and the proposal was a response to a single issue in the ordinance and did not address stealth facilities more broadly. Additional information regarding this request can be found in Staff’s report for the Commission. Draft ordinances are not provided with requests that have received a negative recommendation from the Planning Commission. PUBLIC PROCESS: Community Council Notice: A notice of application was sent to all Salt Lake City Recognized Community Organizations on October 5, 2021, regarding the proposed text amendment. The Recognized Organizations were given 45 days to respond with any concerns or to ask the applicant to discuss the proposed amendment at one of their meetings. Three Community Councils (Sugarhouse, Greater Avenues, and Yalecrest) invited the applicant and Staff to their meetings. The Sugar House and Greater Avenues Community Councils sent official responses that are included with Staff’s report to the Planning Commission. Public Open House: The petition was posted to the Planning Division’s Online Open House webpage from October 5 to December 1, 2021. Staff received 58 comments from the public, two of which were in support of the request and the rest opposed. They are included with Staff’s report to the Planning Commission. Planning Commission Meeting: On December 8, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed zoning text amendment. The only comment was from Judi Short, representing the Sugar House Community Council, who brought up concerns that she had received from the neighborhood. The commission voted to provide a negative recommendation to the City Council with a unanimous vote of 5-0, with one commissioner abstaining. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of December 8, 2021 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of December 8, 2021 (Click to Access, item begins on page 7) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of December 8, 2021 (Click to Access Report) Page 3 of 3 EXHIBITS: 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Hearing 3) Comments not included with PC Staff Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. COMMENTS NOT INCLUDED WITH PC STAFF REPORT 1.Project Chronology PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2020-00284 September 2, 2021 Mr. Simmons submits petition in its current form October 4, 2021 Petition posted to the Planning Division’s Online Open House webpage; The public comment period ended November 18, 2021 November 23, 2021 Planning Commission hearing notice posted on City and State websites. December 8, 2021 Planning Commission reviewed the petition and conducted a public hearing. The commission then voted 5-0 to send a negative recommendation to the City Council. January 12, 2022 Planning Commission ratified the minutes of the December 8, 2021 meeting 2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2020-00284 - Request to Allow Stealth Wireless Telecommunication Facilities in the PL – Public Lands Zoning District – Pete Simmons, representing Cellco Partnership (dba Verizon Wireless), is requesting to amend section(s) of title 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District and 21A.40.090.E Wireless Telecommunication Facilities to increase the allowed height of stealth wireless telecommunication facilities to 75 feet in the PL Public Lands Zoning District. Specifically, this request would allow stealth wireless telecommunication facilities taller than 35 feet in the PL district as a conditional use. The PL district is located city-wide, so this request would affect all Council Districts. (Staff contact: Aaron Barlow at 801-535-6182 or aaron.barlow@slcgov.com). As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b). Please visit slc.gov/council/news/featured- news/virtually-attend-city-council-meetings-2/ to learn how you can share your comments live during electronic City Council meetings. If you would like to provide feedback or comments via email or phone, please contact us through our 24-hour comment line at 801-535-7654 or by email at council.comments@slcgov.com. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Aaron Barlow at 801-535-6182 between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at aaron.barlow@slcgov.com. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535- 7600, or relay service 711. 3. Comments not included with PC Staff Report ELPCO (East Liberty Park Community Organization) elpcoslc@gmail.com www.facebook/com/ELPCO December 7, 2021 Dear Salt Lake City Planning Commissioners: I am writing to oppose the Stealth Towers Text Amendment (PLNPCM2020-00284) on the agenda for the December 8 meeting. ELPCO is the East Liberty Park Community Organization, a recognized community organization in Salt Lake City representing the 4,000 households between Liberty Park and East High School. ELPCO has been tracking this issue since the initial proposal in 2020 (PLNPCM2020-00284) by Verizon Wireless to allow stealth towers up to 60 feet tall as conditional uses (i.e., allowable) in all zoning districts. Along with the Planning Department and several other community councils, we opposed the initial proposal in a letter dated May 19, 2021, writing, “We believe this proposal goes too far in revising the zoning code and raising height restrictions to exceed local limits. We believe height limits are one of the most important design elements of local zoning.” Now, Verizon has returned with a curtailed proposal to allow taller (75 feet) antennas in more limited areas (Public Lands-PL districts). The first thing ELPCO did was seek input from our community. The majority of responses we received have been favorable or ambivalent to the proposal. • “Let them install towers so all of us can have service in the area!” wrote BL. • MH wrote: “Can I put one in my back yard? I can’t get a signal in my house.” • LB opposes the amendment, writing “We already have their ugly brown cell towers along our park strips, notably here on the East Bench. This proposal is another step in the wrong direction.” • DS replied: “That's the price of technology. If you oppose this don't complain about poor signal.” • On Nextdoor.com, DD replied: “I don’t see what the issue is. I don’t see anyone objecting to electrical poles, and I even tried to rally people to push the city to bury all electrical (which received a collective groan).” Improving wireless connectivity and reliability is important to many of our community members. And unlike utilities, proximity to infrastructure matters when it comes to better cellular service. Next, we looked at the impact within ELPCO. There are three major Public Lands-PL districts in ELPCO: East High School, Emerson Elementary, and the SLC Fire Station #5 on 900 South. Nearby PL districts include Hawthorne Elementary on 700 East and the USPS Post office on 1100 East. The PL parcel with the densest residential setting is Emerson Elementary, although any antenna there would likely be sited in the athletic area east of the school and adjacent to the RB zoning along 1100 East. As a result, the immediate residential impacts of this amendment appear to be limited in ELPCO… except for the visual impact of a 75-foot metallic brown pine tree with antenna-like foliage jutting above the 30-foot rooftops of houses so that we can download that 4K Hallmark holiday movie a little bit faster. ELPCO (East Liberty Park Community Organization) elpcoslc@gmail.com www.facebook/com/ELPCO Because the potential stealth antennas would be so much taller than any other existing structure in the neighborhood, this visual impact cannot be ignored. Lastly, we considered the impact of this amendment on the overall zoning code and application. And based on this review, we decided to oppose this amendment. First, the motivation for this amendment appears to be the city’s denial to Verizon to build an 80-foot stealth antenna at the Pioneer Police Precinct (zoned PL). We don’t think it is wise to change zoning for the entire city based on the circumstances of one application in a single parcel. Raising the local height restriction for cellular antennas might work for the Pioneer Police Precinct, but it doesn’t mean that similar zoning changes will conform with conditions in ELPCO or other neighborhoods with dense, low-scale residential housing. Second, the scope of the amendment is broad enough to allow Verizon or other wireless carriers to construct antennas in multiple formats that are not in line with the local height limits and building conditions of neighborhoods. The juxtaposition of a 75-foot antenna looming above a row of 30-foot rooflines is entirely plausible under this amendment. Third, we all know that “conditional use” actually means “this train has already left the station.” Conditional use applications are not an efficient or truthful approach to zoning decisions. As a result, the wireless carriers should collaborate with the SLC Planning Department to craft a new zoning code that provides clear, unconditional height limits based on existing and adjacent zoning without the trapdoor of conditional use to allow for unforeseen and harmful impacts. Salt Lake City is facing wireless infrastructure development on multiple fronts. From the proliferation of 5G monopoles to the demand for self-driving cars and better, faster wireless service, these complex pressures require a broad, collaborative process to address wireless infrastructure in the city. This is what we called for in our May 19 letter about the first proposal by Verizon: “We would also like to see a broader coalition—beyond just wireless carriers—engaged in efforts to address equity issues between wireline (i.e., wired Internet access) and wireless connectivity. We know that many residents of ELPCO and other city neighborhoods rely on wireless networks for Internet access in their homes. We also know this need has increased during the pandemic. But resolving this issue should engage more actors than wireless carriers, including city agencies, local nonprofits, and the Salt Lake City Schools. And real and lasting change must involve additional reforms beyond easing zoning and height limits for cell towers.” As a result, I request the SLC Planning Commission deny the Stealth Towers Text Amendment (PLNPCM2020- 00284) until it can be considered in context with all of the wireless infrastructure decisions within the city. Sincerely, Jason Stevenson ELPCO, co-chair 1 Barlow, Aaron From:Margo <becker.margo@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, December 6, 2021 10:20 PM To:Barlow, Aaron Subject:(EXTERNAL) Oppose stealth towers Hi. Please add me to the list of those opposed to Verizon’s proposal for taller stealth towers on public lands. Thanks! Margo Becker December 8, 2021 Dear Salt Lake Planning Commissioners: I am writing to oppose the Stealth Towers Text Amendment (PLNPCM2020-00284) which you will discuss tonight at your Commission meeting. In May, when Verizon requested permitted uses to install 60-foot stealth towers in all zoning across Salt Lake except residential zones, I sent an opposition letter to both the Planning Commission and City Council. This was my argument: “The 60-foot height is unprecedented in most low-density commercial zones like CN-Neighborhood Commercial and CB - Community Business. If the Commission is a pushover for this 60-foot stealth monopole request, then surely they will give Verizon carte blanche to build a 5G tower forest throughout Salt Lake City.” Verizon withdrew that request but is back with another – a “conditional use” proposal to place 75-foot stealth (disguised) wireless towers in PL (Public Lands) zones –anywhere in the city. I urge you to deny the request on these grounds: 1. Conditional use means Verizon has free reign to place their towers indiscriminately in PL zones throughout the city. It’s the proverbial “keys to the car.” Once granted, Verizon can pretty much do what they want, which is troubling. This will tie the city’s hands and hold back residents from determining, or having a say in precisely how many, where and when these towering behemoths will be placed. 2. Don’t buy the argument that PL zones are in non-descript corners of the city that are hidden and that no one cares about. We have three PL zones in the beautiful, residential neighborhood of Yalecrest -- Unitah Elementary School on 1300 South and 1500 East, Bonneville Elementary School on 1900 East and Harvard Avenue, and the East High School baseball park at the Southwest corner of Yalecrest on 900 South. Both schools are surrounded on four sides by single-family homes. There is a neighborhood near the ball park. We are opposed to 75-foot wireless towers in our beautiful neighborhood. 3. Property devaluation. Have you seen comparative photos of what a 75-foot tower looks after construction? (See photos below) A 2014 survey by the National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy supported the idea that cell towers hurt interest in real estate properties and value, according to the institute’s website. If you approve this, you will have to justify your reasoning to 2,750+ homeowners in Yalecrest who live near Unitah Elementary, Bonneville Elementary and the East High School baseball park. 4. These stealth towers are UGLY. (See pictures below) There is no way to “disguise” a 75- foot-tall wireless tower and make it look beautiful. They pierce the horizon and scream “I don’t fit in.” 5. Our understanding is if Verizon is granted conditional use, it opens the door for other carriers to have the same privileges. There are at least four other major carriers – AT&T, T-Mobile, US Cellular, and Sprint Nextel. Could we see a veritable forest of these 75- foot towers? Please think carefully about the consequences. We support the recommendation from our community council colleague Jason Stevenson, chair of ELPCO: “Wireless carriers should collaborate with the SLC Planning Department to craft a new zoning code that provides clear, unconditional height limits based on existing and adjacent zoning without the trapdoor of conditional use to allow for harmful impacts.” We strongly urge you to deny this conditional use request. Respectfully, Janet (Jan) Hemming Chair Yalecrest Neighborhood Council CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:March 22, 2022 RE: Western Gardens Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2021-00420 The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the zoning map for property located at 550 South 600 East from its current Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to Form Based Urban Neighborhood District (FB-UN2). This request would facilitate the redevelopment of the parcel into a multifamily project consistent with the goals of the urban neighborhood development zones and proximity to transit. Western Garden Center has been located on this property for many years. The property owner and developer are working together on the proposed redevelopment project, though no specific development plans have been submitted. Multifamily developments are not permitted under the existing CN zoning designation but are a permitted use in the FB-UN2 zoning district. The applicant originally proposed changing the zoning designation to Residential Office (RO) at a presentation to the Central City Neighborhood Council but modified the proposal to FB-UN2 following community and Planning staff comments at the meeting. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at its December 8, 2021 meeting. Planning staff recommended and the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council. The applicant requested Historic Landmark Commission review of the proposal because this property is within the Central City Local Historic District. The Commission reviewed the proposal at its January 6, 2022 meeting. At that meeting the developer stated they would not remove any historic structures or housing on the property. The Commission provided little direction to the applicant other than an expectation they would be respectful of surrounding neighbors. No recommendation was provided to the City Council. Item Schedule: Briefing: March 22, 2022 Set Date: March 22, 2022 Public Hearing: April 5, 2022 Potential Action: April 19, 2022 Page | 2 Area zoning map with subject property outlined in red. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning map amendment, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. The applicant stated they would not remove any historic structures on the property. Would the Council like to ask the applicant if they would consider including that condition in a development agreement? 2. Based on the feedback provided by the Historic Landmark Commission, the Council may wish to ask what neighborhood impacts may be expected by the future development. 3. Is the Council supportive of the proposed zoning map amendment? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Council is only being asked to consider the rezoning of the property. No plans have been submitted to the City nor is it within the scope of the Council’s authority to review the plans. Because the zoning of a property can outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project. Planning staff identified three key issues related to the proposal which are found on pages 7-8 of the Planning Commission staff report. They are summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the staff report. Issue 1-The redevelopment of the subject property is a multi-step and complex project. The rezone of the property is only the first step in the overall redevelopment. A series of applications associated with the proposed redevelopment would need to be filed for City consideration. The property is in the Central City Local Historic District and would be required to meet standards of the Historic Preservation Overlay Zone. New construction on the property would require Historic Landmark Commission approval. Planned development approval is a possibility depending on design of new construction. Issue 2-Why the FB-UN2 Zone and why would it be appropriate? The FB-UN2 district aims to create an urban neighborhood providing the following: Page | 3 Options for housing types Options in terms of shopping, dining, and fulfilling daily needs within walking distance or conveniently located near mass transit Transportation options Access to employment opportunities within walking distance or close to mass transit Appropriately scaled buildings that respect the existing character of the neighborhood Safe, accessible, and interconnected networks for people to move around in Increased desirability as a place to work, live, play, and invest through higher quality form and design In the Planning Commission staff report staff stated “To summarize, the FB-UN2 zone is appropriate at this location because there is the potential to realize all of the criteria specifically envisioned for creating an attractive urban neighborhood. It allows for the mix of uses if desired, it allows for future development flexibility, promotes creative solutions in design, and most importantly is located within close proximity to mass transit. The request for a rezone to FB-UN2 is also consistent with Central Community Master Plan policy.” They also found the property’s proximity to the Trolley Square Trax station is a primary reason FB- UN2 zoning is appropriate. Issue 3-The property proposed for rezoning is subject to the standards of the H – Historic Preservation Overlay Zone. As noted above, the subject property is in the Central City Historic District and subject to the H – Historic Preservation Overlay District development standards. These standards are intended to ensure development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and preserve historic neighborhood resources. The Historic Preservation Overlay District standards for new development require compatibility with surrounding structures and streetscapes. This may limit new structure height to less than the FB-UN2 zoning designation would typically allow. Planning staff noted development will need to be sensitive to the variety of mass and scale on surrounding properties, including less dense residential development to the south and west. Future development plans will be reviewed by the Historic Landmark Commission for applicable development standards within the Historic Preservation Overlay District. Planning staff concluded the zoning map amendment meets or can meet standards summarized in the analysis of standards below. MASTER PLAN CONSIDERATIONS Attachment C (pages 15-17 of the Planning Commission staff report) includes master plan considerations which are summarized below. Please see Planning’s staff report for the full analysis. Central Community Master Plan The Central Community Master Plan identifies the subject property as part of the Trolley Station Area due to its proximity to Trax. The Trolley Station is part of an Urban Neighborhood Station Area which has established development with a mixture of uses and can support increased residential density and supporting commercial uses. New development typically occurs on underdeveloped or underutilized properties. Compact developments are desired to focus new growth at the station while respecting existing neighborhood scale and intensity. Planning staff is supportive of the rezone and found it is consistent with the Trolley Station area goals in the Master Plan. H-Historic Preservation Overlay District Planning staff included the Historic Preservation Overlay District purpose statement, which says: Page | 4 In order to contribute to the welfare, prosperity and education of the people of Salt Lake City, the purpose of the H- historic preservation overlay district is to: 1.Provide the means to protect and preserve areas of the city and individual structures and sites having historic, architectural or cultural significance; 2.Encourage new development, redevelopment and the subdivision of lots in historic districts that is compatible with the character of existing development of historic districts or individual landmarks; 3.Abate the destruction and demolition of historic structures; 4.Implement adopted plans of the city related to historic preservation; 5.Foster civic pride in the history of Salt Lake City; 6.Protect and enhance the attraction of the city's historic landmarks and districts for tourists and visitors; 7.Foster economic development consistent with historic preservation; and 8.Encourage social, economic and environmental sustainability. Planning wanted to “put all interested parties on notice that the standards associated with the Overlay will play a significant role in the future development of the subject property.” Plan Salt Lake Planning staff noted the following guiding principles outlined in Plan Salt Lake and found the proposed rezone aligns with these along with policies and strategies in the Plan. Growing responsibly while providing people with choices about where they live, how they live, and how they get around. A beautiful city that is people focused. A balanced economy that produces quality jobs and foster an environment for commerce, local business, and industry to thrive. ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Attachment D (pages 18-19) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Complies Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent properties Complies Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Future development will need to meet standards of Historic Preservation Overlay Page | 5 The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection. Complies (Infrastructure may need to be upgraded at owner’s expense to meet City requirements.) PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • April 26, 2021-Application submitted. • May 17, 2021-Petition assigned to Lex Traughber, Senior Planner. • May 19, 2021-Notification sent to the Central Community Neighborhood Council (CCNC). • Mat 28, 2021-Early notification sent to property owners and residents within 300’ of the subject parcel. • June 24, 2021-Application presentation at CCNC monthly meeting on rezone from CN to RO. Following the meeting, in response to community and Planning staff feedback the applicant decided to consider modifying their proposal. • September 1, 2021-Application submitted to Planning to rezone property from CN to FB-UN2. • November 23, 2021-applicant presentation to CCNC to change zoning from CN to FB-UN2. • November 24, 2021-Property posted with signs for the December 8, 2021 Planning Commission hearing. Listserv notification of Planning Commission agenda emailed. Agenda posted on the Planning Division and State websites. • December 8, 2021-Planning Commission public hearing. Six people spoke or had their comments read at the hearing. All were opposed to the FB-UN2 zoning designation. The Commission voted 4-2 in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council. • December 9, 2021-Sent to Attorney’s Office. • January 6, 2022-Applicant met with Historic Landmark Commission to review the proposal in a work session. The Commission provided little feedback to the applicant. • January 10, 2022-Planning Division received ordinance from Attorney’s Office. • February 18, 2022-Transmittal received by City Council Office. WESTERN GARDENS ZONING MAP AMENDMEMT PLNPCM2021-00420 Request to amend the zoning map to change the zoning for the 2.3 acre parcel located at 550 S. 600 East from CN –Neighborhood Commercial to FB-UN2 –Form Based Urban Neighborhood District. PROJECT REQUEST Salt Lake City // Planning Division Request to amend the zoning map to change the zoning for the 2.3 acre parcel located at 550 S. 600 East from CN –Neighborhood Commercial to FB-UN2 –Form Based Urban Neighborhood District. PROJECT REQUEST Salt Lake City // Planning Division Salt Lake City // Planning Division Salt Lake City // Planning Division Salt Lake City // Planning Division ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 10, 2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2021-00420 Western Gardens Zoning Map Amendment 550 S. 600 East STAFF CONTACT: Lex Traughber, Senior Planner (801) 5356184 or lex.traughber@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council amend the zoning map as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Tyler Morris, Cottonwood Residential, proposes to amendment the zoning map to change the zoning for the 2.3 acre parcel noted above from CN – Neighborhood Commercial to FB-UN2 – Form Based Urban Neighborhood District in its entirety. The parcel is currently occupied by the Western Gardens commercial center. This zoning map amendment change will facilitate the redevelopment of this parcel into a multifamily residential project. The zoning map amendment does not require an amendment to the Central Community Master Plan. PUBLIC PROCESS: ●Early Notification – Notification of the proposal was sent to all property owners and Lisa Shaffer (Feb 18, 2022 11:50 MST)02/18/2022 02/18/2022 tenants located within 300 feet of the subject parcels on December May 28, 2021. In addition, the Central Community Neighborhood Council (CCNC) was also provided notification on May 19, 2021. ● Central Community Neighborhood Council – The applicant presented and discussed the proposal to rezone the property from CN to RO at the CCNC meeting on June 24, 2021. Planning Staff was in attendance. The applicant subsequently revised their request to rezone the property from CN to FB-UN2. The applicant presented and discussed the revised proposal with the CCNC on November 18, 2021. A letter from the CCNC is attached in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 8, 2021. ● Planning Commission Meeting – On December 8, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. The Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation regarding the proposal on to the City Council for decision. ● Historic Landmark Commission Meeting – On January 6, 2022, the Historic Landmark Commission held a work session regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. The HLC provided little feedback to the applicant. PLANNING AND HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION RECORDS: a) PC Agenda of December 8, 2021 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of December 8, 2021 (Click to Access) c) PC Staff Report of December 8, 2021 (Click to Access) d) HLC Agenda of January 6, 2022 (Click to Access) e) HLC Minutes of January 6, 2022 (Click to Access) f) HLC Staff Memorandum of January 6, 2022 (Click to Access) EXHIBITS: 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. MAILING LIST 5. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2022 (Amending the zoning of the property located at 550 South 600 East Street from CN Neighborhood Commercial District to FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to the property located at 550 South 600 East Street from CN Neighborhood Commercial District to FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00420. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 8, 2021 on an application submitted by Tyler Morris, Cottonwood Residential, to rezone the property located at 550 South 600 East Street (Tax ID No. 16-06-476-029) from CN Neighborhood Commercial District to FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2021-00420; and WHEREAS, at its December 8, 2021 meeting, the planning commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said application; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Property identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be and hereby is rezoned from CN Neighborhood Commercial District to FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2022. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2022. Published: ______________. APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney January 10, 2022 EXHIBIT “A” Legal Description for the Property to be Rezoned: Address: 550 S.600 East Tax ID No. 16-06-476-029 1011 S 6.5 RDS OF LOT 7 & ALL LOT 8 BLK 24 PLAT B SLC SUR ALSO COM AT NW COR SD LOT 7 E 10 RDS S 3.5 RDS W 10 RDS N 3.5 RDS 5429-2544 5520-0002 8498-3111 8498-3108 THRU 3110 9524-5493 Contains 99,317 sq feet or 2.28 acres more or less. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. MAILING LIST 5. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Western Gardens Zoning Map Amendment Petitions PLNPCM2021-00420 April 26, 2021 Petitions received by the City. May 17, 2021 Petitions assigned to and received by Lex Traughber. May 19, 2021 The Central Community Neighborhood Council (CCNC) was emailed notification of the proposal. May 28, 2021 Early notification mailed to property owners and tenants located within 300 feet of the subject property boundaries. June 24, 2021 The applicant formally presented the proposal to the CCNC at their regularly scheduled monthly meeting. The applicant presented a proposal to rezone the subject property from CN to RO at the CCNC meeting. Planning Staff was in attendance. Subsequent to the meeting on the basis of feedback from the community and Planning Staff, the applicant decided to consider a modification to their proposal. September 1, 2021 The applicant formally submitted the request to the Planning Division to rezone the property from CN to FB-UN2. November 18, 2021 The applicant formally presented the proposal to the CCNC to change the zoning from CN to FB-UN2. November 23, 2021 Notice of the Planning Commission’s December 8, 2021 Public Hearing mailed to all property owners and residents within 300 feet of the subject property. November 24, 2021 Property posted with signs for the December 8, 2021 Planning Commission hearing. Listserve notification of Planning Commission agenda emailed. Agenda posted on the Planning Division and State websites December 8, 2021 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation regarding the request on to the City Council for a decision. December 9, 2021 Sent a draft ordinance to the City Attorney’s Office for review reflecting the Planning Commission’s recommendation regarding the zoning map amendment. Requested review of the draft ordinance. January 6, 2022 The applicant met with the Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) to discuss the proposal in a work session. The HLC provided limited feedback. January 10, 2022 Received ordinance from the City Attorney’s Office. February 4, 2022 Transmittal submitted to CAN. 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2021-00420 Western Gardens Zoning Map Amendment– Tyler Morris, Cottonwood Residential, proposes to amendment the zoning map to change the zoning for the 2.3 acre parcel noted above from CN – Neighborhood Commercial to FB-UN2 – Form Based Urban Neighborhood District in its entirety. The parcel is currently occupied by the Western Gardens commercial center. This zoning map amendment change will facilitate the redevelopment of this parcel into a multifamily residential project. The subject property is located in Council District 4 represented by Ana Valdemoro. As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held electronically: DATE: Date #1 and Date #2 TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: **This meeting will not have a physical location. **This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation. If you are interested in participating in the Public Hearing, please visit our website at https://www.slc.gov/council/ to learn how you can share your comments during the meeting. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Lex Traughber at (801) 535-6184 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at lex.traughber@slcgov.com People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. ORIGINAL PETITION PLNPCM2021-00420 Submittal Requirements: 1. A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment. This proposed amendment of the zoning map is to change the zoning for the 2.3 acre parcel 16-06-476-029 from its current Commercial Neighborhood (CN) use to Form Based Urban Neighborhood District (FB-UN2) in its entirety. This zoning map amendment change will facilitate the potential sale and redevelopment of this parcel, as a partnership between the current owner and Cottonwood Residential, into a multifamily project. This site currently houses the Western Garden Center which has been a part of the community for multiple years. The owners of this business view this redevelopment as a part of their retirement plan and would not plan to remain in business in this location under different circumstances. The building located on this parcel has been confirmed as a non-contributing structure within the historic overlay of this neighborhood. The adjacent land use and zones within this block include CN, RO, RFM-35 and SR-3 as the block transitions from higher density, commercial and mixed uses (CN and RO) to a more residential scale that continues further South (RFM-35 and SR- 3). The intent of this project to develop a multifamily project would strengthen this transition with an appropriate residential use that provides its own parking, doesn’t compete but rather supports the adjacent commercial uses in Trolley Square and supports a walkable, diverse neighborhood with access to grocery stores and established public transportation systems. The zone change to FB-UN2 respects the Central Community Master Plan desire for a transitional zone from the high density RO zoning to the north to the low density single family neighborhood to the south while allowing for multi-family housing uses that meet the purpose statement for the zone. This location with the FB-UN2 rezone will create a people-oriented place with diverse housing opportunities, convenient shopping and mass transit opportunities. There are opportunities for employment within walking distance and the design will be an appropriately scaled building(s) that respect the existing character of the neighborhood while increasing interconnection, access and safety. This zone addresses adjacency to commercial vs. residential zones with specific step back, yard and height requirements that will create a natural transition. Additionally the focus of this zone on form and how buildings are oriented to the public space means that concerns regarding massing will be directly addressed. 2. A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned. The proposed new use of this property is a multifamily residential development. This new development under the new FB-UN2 zoning is located within the Central City Neighborhood and Historic District. This means that the plans for redevelopment will be subject to review by the Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) and the character and form of the design will be reviewed for compliance with the Historic Design Guidelines for New Construction Guidelines. This also allows the HLC to modify lot and bulk requirements per 21A.06.050.C.6. These requirements will promote continuity of the historic character of the neighborhood as a part of this new development. Additionally the FB- UN2 zone also has form requirements that the planning commission will review, providing two types of oversight. It is the intent of the development to use these resources as an opportunity to create a unique community within the neighborhood that is an asset to the existing amenities and respects the adjacent residential zones and the streetscape. There will be no loss of historic structures or housing stock as a result of this development, in fact, housing stock will be increased to help address the current housing crisis in Salt Lake City. 3. List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area. The present zoning, CN, is a low density zone that does not allow for multifamily uses. Additionally the commercial use of this location currently competes with the Trolley Square development while additional multi-family residential use would support this use and provide an adjacent workforce to support the retail and commercial functions. This location, adjacent to commercial, retail and public transportation resources promotes walkable, sustainable living in the heart of the city. It creates a more appropriate transition to the adjacent low density residential neighborhood and provides housing opportunities. 4. Is the request amending the Zoning Map? Yes; Address – 550 600 E Suite, Salt Lake City, UT 84102; Parcel #16-06-476-029 5. Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance? Not Applicable 4. MAILING LIST NAME ADDRESS UNIT CITY STATE ZIP EAST DOWNTOWN LLC 1014 VINE ST CINCINNATI OH 45202 EAST DOWNTOWN LLC 170 S MAIN ST # 1600 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SMITH'S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS INC 1014 VINE ST CINCINNATI OH 45202 LIBERTY SQUARE PROPERTIES, LLC 6440 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 QUINNA, LLC 504 E 500 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 MICHAEL TRAN; VAN CAM PHU (JT)437 EAGLEPOINTE CIR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 TODD L EVANS; JOANNE EVANS (JT)4005 W 6305 S TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129 AMBEL LLC PO BOX 58054 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 517 SOUTH 500 EAST LLC 672 E UNION SQ SANDY UT 84070 CIMC LANA MARIE, LLC 461 E 200 S # 102 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CAROLYN R PEARCE 511 E HAWTHORNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 MIKE DIXON; KIM DIXON (JT)515 E HAWTHORNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 LYNN VALDEZ 3596 S 3340 W WEST VALLEY UT 84119 BRENDAN M MERRICK 525 E HAWTHORNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 RUTH A BROWN 529 E HAWTHORNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 JACQUELINE M ROBERTS 533 E HAWTHORNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 MARK SHANBRUN 539 E HAWTHORNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 2275 E PARLEYS TER SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 2275 E PARLEYS TER SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 LC VALENTINER ENTERPRISES 524 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 LC VALENTINER ENTERPRISES 524 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 CLAYTON PROPERTIES I LLC 550 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 517 SOUTH 500 EAST LLC 672 E UNION SQ SANDY UT 84070 DIABLO PROPTERTIES, LLC 24 APPIAN CT DONVILLE CA 94526 EELON HOLDINGS LLC SERIES 500 EAST 265 E NINTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 DIABLO PROPTERTIES, LLC 24 APPIAN CT DONVILLE CA 94526 NEWHOUSE UTAH, LLC 9650 S MCCARRAN BLVD RENO NV 89523 MICHAEL L JACOBS 559 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 EMILY COONROD; ARTHUR TURLAK (JT)1938 E HOLLYWOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 DYLAN WINSLOW; JOAN WINSLOW (JT)565 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 MICHAEL KARSY; ODESSA B KARSY (JT)727 SOUTH ST # A PHILADELPHIA PA 19147 LP NORTH PARK UT APARTMENTS 321 CITRUS CIR WALNUT CREEK CA 94598 STEPHEN MONAGHAN; MARIA D L A SERRANO (JT)512 E HAWTHORNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 LACHELLE RICHARDSON JONES; SPENCER WAYNE JONES 516 E HAWTHORNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 LARRY M RICHARDSON 522 E HAWTHORNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 JOSHUA J PACE; JUSTIN L MARTIN 526 E HAWTHORNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 SVEN A MILLER 320 HUNTINGDON PIKE FRN JENKINTOWN PA 19046 LARRY M RICHARDSON 534 E HAWTHORNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 RANDI PEERY; JOHN G III HANLON (JT)538 E HAWTHORNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 JAMES MISKA 519 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 DAYSTAR HOMES LLC 523 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 LESLIE V NILSSON 521 W 1400 N FARMINGTON UT 84025 GRANT MICHAEL HAWLEY; MADISON LYNN SLACK (JT)533 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 GLEN C CHRISTIANSEN 14228 S NEWBURY PARK CIR DRAPER UT 84020 AMANDA J DAVIS; JOHN DAVIS (JT)543 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 545 EAST LC 1709 E PRINCETON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 YA-JUNG LIN 553 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 561 EAST 600 SOUTH LLC 1332 S COLONIAL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 561 EAST 600 SOUTH LLC 1332 S COLONIAL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 560 SOUTH 600 EAST LLC 672 E UNION SQ SANDY UT 84070 560 SOUTH 600 EAST LLC 672 E UNION SQ SANDY UT 84070 SIXTH AND SIXTH LC 911 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 VIVI LLC 850 S MENDON CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 ERNESTO GUSTAVO GUTIERREZ 2727 S WESTTEMPLE ST SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 ERNESTO GUSTAVO GUTIERREZ 2727 S WESTTEMPLE ST SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 TROLLEY SQUARE VENTURES LLC 630 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 DARRELL J MOORE; AMANDA K FINLAYSON (JT)603 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 BRIAN SPENCER; ALICIA SPENCER (JT)7722 S SABAL AVE COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 SCOTT & REBECCA BROWN FAMILY TRUST 12/8/2017 613 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 BORIS A KURZ 1203 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 WESTERN REGION NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION223 W 700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KYLE H GISH; LINDSAY R GISH (JT)530 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 JOSHUA K JONES; STEVEN FINAU (TC)532 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 HEIDI MCNULTY 5267 W SUN BLOOM CIR HERRIMAN UT 84096 ERIK V VOGEL 2139 E ROCKLIN DR SANDY UT 84092 MBD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 937 S LINCOLN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 564 EAST 600 SOUTH LC 8980 S MELBURY CIR SANDY UT 84093 STUART A CLASON; TIFFANY W CLASON (JT)566 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 MARC A WARTENBERGER; MACKENZIE P WARTENBERGE 2505 WAUNONA WY MADISON WI 53713 NOAH ANDERS; AMANDA COSTA (JT)570 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 RONALD T ROMERO; TERRI L ROMERO (TC)578 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 KRISTEE S DOERFLER 620 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 MANUKA LLC PO BOX 526297 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 TROLLEY SQUARE VENTURES LLC 630 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 ROBINSON PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC 5005 S 900 E MILLCREEK UT 84117 512 EAST 500 SOUTH LLC 672 E UNION SQ SANDY UT 84070 512 EAST 500 SOUTH LLC 672 E UNION SQ SANDY UT 84070 512 EAST 500 SOUTH LLC 672 E UNION SQ SANDY UT 84070 512 EAST 500 SOUTH LLC 672 E UNION SQ SANDY UT 84070 512 EAST 500 SOUTH LLC 672 E UNION SQ SANDY UT 84070 512 EAST 500 SOUTH LLC 672 E UNION SQ SANDY UT 84070 5TH & 5TH SOUTH CONDOMINIUM HOA 672 E UNION SQ SANDY UT 84070 TRACY FAMILY TRUST 08/23/2016 537 S 500 E #101 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 LINDSAY NEWTON; OLIVIA R TARIN (JT)537 S 500 E #102 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 KEVIN HERRMANN; BEVERLY HERRMANN (JT)138 E 12300 S DRAPER UT 84020 CHRISTOPHER PEART 537 S 500 E #104 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 RUDOLPH W PEART; LORRAINE PEART (JT)537 S 500 E #105 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 JONATHAN S HILLER; LAUREN H HILLER (JT)537 S 500 E #106 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 ROSE OWNERS ASSOCIATION 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING B CENTERVILLE UT 84014 Current Occupant 455 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 464 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 479 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 639 E 500 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 511 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 506 E 500 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 510 E 500 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 560 E 500 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 517 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 521 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 521 E HAWTHORNE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 510 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 512 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 518 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 519 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 530 E 500 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 541 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 530 E 500 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 540 E 500 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 557 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 553 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 567 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 577 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 530 E HAWTHORNE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 529 E 600 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 537 E 600 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 545 E 600 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 559 E 600 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 561 E 600 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 564 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 562 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 573 E 600 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 582 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 563 E 600 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 567 E 600 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 602 E 500 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 607 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 617 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 518 E 600 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 602 S PARK ST Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 608 S PARK ST Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 620 S PARK ST Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 564 E 600 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 568 E 600 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 607 S PARK ST Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 603 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 614 E 600 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 512 E 500 S #512A Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 512 E 500 S #512B Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 512 E 500 S #512C Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 514 E 500 S #514A Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 514 E 500 S #514B Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 514 E 500 S #514C Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 512 E 500 S Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 537 S 500 E #103 Salt Lake City UT 84102 Current Occupant 537 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84102 Lex Traughber 451 S. State Street, Rm 406 PO Box 1453 Salt Lake City UT 84114-5480 Tyler Morris - Cottonwood Residential 1245 Brickyard Road Suite 250 Salt Lake City UT 84106 5. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT From:Janet Hemming To:Planning Public Comments; Clark, Aubrey; Traughber, Lex Subject:(EXTERNAL) Opposition letter to Western Gardens rezone (PLNPCM2021-00420 ) Date:Wednesday, December 8, 2021 3:55:58 PM Attachments:Western Gardens opposition letter.docx Dear Salt Lake City Planning Commissioners: Attached is a letter opposing the Western Garden rezone. I ask that you review it before your Commission meeting tonight and that it be placed in the official record. Respectfully, Janet (Jan) Hemming Chair, Yalecrest Neighborhood Council December 8, 2021 Dear Salt Lake City Planning Commissioners: I oppose the petition of Tyler Morris, Cottonwood Residential, to rezone the Western Gardens property at 550 South 600 East to FB-UN2 – Form Based Urban Neighborhood District (PLNPCM2021-00420 ). My opposition is based on the following: • The Planning Department staff report says the zone change request “respects the Central Community Master Plan.” How was that conclusion possibly reached because this proposal is in direct conflict with the Central Community Master Plan and the Preservation Plan created in 2012. The FB-UN2 zone allows for structures up to 50 feet in height. This project would dwarf the buildings across the street at Trolley Square and tower above the single-family homes on Hawthorne Avenue. • This property is in an historic district and subject to the Historic Preservation Overlay Zone. 50-foot structures are not permitted in historic districts. • One of the most important statements in the staff report emphasizes that this property “is adjacent to less intense residential development existing on to the south and west. Future development of the subject property will need to be sensitive to this surrounding mass and scale and will need to be particularly sensitive in terms of building heights and setbacks.” Loud sirens should sound with this message because what this means is the neighborhood is going to be overwhelmed with a gigantic, towering structure that has no place in this location. It will negatively impact the nearby homes and residences. We understand a 10-story structure is proposed and was originally going to be 12 stories. Why is that not clearly disclosed in the staff report? • The Salt Lake City’s Planning Department should be renamed “The Friendly Developer’s Department.” As a taxpayer and voter, I was under the impression that the Planning Department existed to preserve and develop our communities and neighborhoods in wise ways– especially our historic places, not tear them down, or open the door to behemoth construction projects. • 21A.27.010.B.3 says local streets (600 E is not an arterial) should have relatively low building height, similar to surrounding buildings. Surrounding buildings are 2-3 stories. I am opposed to this petition, and hope as Commissioners you will consider the damaging consequences this project will have on the concept of historic preservation, the surrounding neighborhood, and the character of this great and beautiful city. As one who resides in an historic neighborhood, these kinds of encroachments send a chilling message about our future and the degree to which the Planning Commission values or doesn’t value historic districts. Respectfully, Janet (Jan) Hemming Chair, Yalecrest Neighborhood Council From:Jan Ellen Burton To:Traughber, Lex Subject:(EXTERNAL) Re: Western Gardens Property Date:Wednesday, December 8, 2021 5:07:09 PM I have enjoyed walking through the neighborhoods adjacent to Trolley Square. There is a special feeling connected with old Salt Lake, much of which is sadly disappearing. I do not counter the idea that the Western Gardens property may need to be replaced. However, the depictions of the build-out on 600 East are disturbing, as there is little positive in the way of architectural design. There is no attempt to integrate the new structures with the neighborhood. I am reminded of the Soviet era cookie-cutter structures I have seen in Eastern Europe--The design is not the same, but the end product appears as regimented. From: To:Planning Public Comments; Traughber, Lex Cc:Clark, Aubrey; Tarbet, Nick; Oktay, Michaela; Thomas, Blake; Price, Angela; Norris, Nick; Valdemoros, Ana; Mano, Darin; "Jesse Hulse"; Ballpark; Lopez, Eva Subject:(EXTERNAL) Western Gardens Zoning Map Amendment Petition PLNPCM2021-00420 Date:Wednesday, December 8, 2021 5:58:32 PM Dear Planning Division & Commission, I join my fellow neighbors in Central City in opposition to this rezoning petition. While FB-UN2 has great potential for the future, in its current state nothing should be rezoned to it until the problems and flaws which it presents are addressed and fixed. We in the Central 9th have seen firsthand for many years the unintended side effects of FB-UN2, we have seen no work done to address these concerns and therefore oppose the zoning from being applied elsewhere until the serious work at correction occurs. Major concerns with FB-UN2 include some of the following. 1. FB-UN2 allows very large projects with significant impact to neighborhoods to be built with little to zero community engagement. Projects which will dramatically change the nature and feel of an area permanently are allowed by right without any offsetting quality of life improvements for those who already live or work in the neighborhoods where they are built. 2. In Central 9th we’ve seen how developers have taken advantage of FB-UN2 to build very poor- quality projects which will not stand the test of time. 3. FB-UN2 discourages greenspace and trees. A simple walk around Central 9th would show anyone the greenspace desert it’s helped create. It would be a terrible shame for such a lovely greenspace as Western Garden to become the micro-unit nightmare of FB-UN2 units you see on West Temple and throughout Central 9th, with no greenspace, no trees, no common space for residents to enjoy, and certainly zero benefit to the quality of life for existing surrounding residents and businesses. 4. FB-UN2 also has little influence in ground level engagement which might possibly offset some of the extreme density it allows, but instead our experience is seeing mailboxes and laundry rooms through ground level windows. There are other issues with FB-UN2 which have been brought to planning and the administrations attention for several years, yet we see no movement to make the minor tweaks and adjustments which would make it a great zoning type for Salt Lake City. Until these serious concerns are addressed and rectified, we cannot in good faith endorse it’s use in any part of the city. Regards, Paul Johnson Chair, Central 9th Community Council Item B10 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 PUBLIC HEARING MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Budget and Policy Analyst DATE:March 22, 2022 RE: Federal HUD Grant Appropriations 2022-2023: Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG), HOME Investment Partnership, and Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. MOTION 2 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date. Staff Note: All public comments received through any communication channel will be included in the City’s report to HUD. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Budget & Public Policy Analyst DATE:March 22, 2022 RE: Federal HUD Grant Appropriations 2022-2023: Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG), HOME Investment Partnership and Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Department’s annual grant programs are one of the most significant ongoing funding sources the City receives from the Federal Government. Fiscal Year 2023 is subject to the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan which introduced new funding goals, strategies, and a targeted area for spending CDBG dollars on public infrastructure and economic development. See the additional info section for the goals and strategies applications must advance to qualify for these grant funds and Attachment 3 for a map of the target area. The Council is scheduled to hold a hybrid public hearing on Tuesday, March 22 to hear from the public and grant applicants regarding community needs for the 2022-2023 funding cycle. As seen in most years, the requested funding from applicants is significantly greater than available funds. Requests are 162% of available funding: $11,389,939 is requested compared to $7,028,013 in available funding. HUD has not provided Salt Lake City’s final grant award amounts. The available funding could change based on HUD’s pending confirmation of the amounts. The resident advisory boards provided recommendations in case funding is more or less than estimated. The board’s recommendations are shown on the Funding Log at the end of each grant and a summary table in the additional info section below. The table below summarizes requested and available funding by grant. Note that the HOPWA grant has more funding available than requested. HOPWA grant awards to the City have more than doubled in the last seven years. Funding awards for the other three grants have not seen similar increases. Gran t Re q u e st A v ai l ab l e Re q u e s t s as % o f Fu n din g A v ai lab l e CDBG 7 ,0 0 6 ,2 3 7$ 4 ,6 7 0 ,5 1 7$ 1 5 0 % ESG 1 ,2 7 5 ,82 7$ $ 3 2 6 ,2 6 7 3 9 1 % HOME 2 ,3 0 3 ,4 85$ 1 ,1 2 1 ,1 0 3$ 2 0 5 % HOPWA 80 4 ,3 9 0$ 9 1 0 ,1 2 6$ 88% TOTA L 1 1 ,3 89 ,9 3 9$ 7 ,0 2 8,0 1 3$ 1 6 2 % Goal of the briefing: Discuss the Council’s federal grant priorities, ask questions about specific applications and allocate funding across eligible programs and projects. Project Timeline: Set Date: February 15, 2022 1st Briefing: March 22, 2022 Public Hearing: March 22, 2022 2nd Briefing: April 5, 2022 3rd Briefing: April 12, 2022 (if needed) Potential Action: April 19, 2022 Page | 2 Minimum Funding Level Five years ago, the City established a minimum funding level for grant awards. HUD recommends a $35,000 minimum award for projects. Housing and Neighborhood Development (HAND) recommends $30,000 after consultations with applicants. The minimum award is aimed at maximizing community benefits from grant awards. The intent of this policy is to balance the burden for the Administration and recipient organizations to manage grant funds with the goal of having positive impacts in the community. This year, no applications were disqualified for requesting less than the minimum funding requirement. Scoring Applications and Funding Recommendations CDBG and ESG projects receive scores and funding recommendations from the CDCIP Board. HOME and HOPWA projects receive funding recommendations from the Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Advisory Board. The advisory board funding recommendations are provided to the Mayor and City Council. The Council receives another set of funding recommendations from the Mayor. The final decision is made by the Council for grant award amounts. Attachment 1 shows projects ranked by the combined score within each grant category. Attachment 2 is the funding log for all four federal grants which has more details than Attachment 1 such as project and program descriptions and prior year award amounts for returning applications. The funding log combines advisory board and Administration scores as shown in the far-right column where maximum potential scores are also shown. Funding Log Trends Council staff noticed the following trends after reviewing the funding logs: - Identical Recommendations – The advisory board and mayoral funding recommendations are identical for all four grants - New Applications – This year there are 14 new applications for CDBG, five for ESG, two for HOME and no new applications for HOPWA. New applications with funding recommendations are: o CDBG Housing #2 First Step House Recovery Residence Rehabilitation o CDBG Housing #3 International Center for Appropriate and Sustainable Technology (ICAST) Decarbonizing Supportive Housing o CDBG Housing #6 Neighborworks of Salt Lake Home Rehabilitation and Improvement o CDBG Neighborhood Improvements #1 City Transportation Division Ballpark TRAX Accessible Pedestrian Crossing o CDBG Public Services #2 Catholic Community Services Case Manager at Weigand Homeless Resource Center o CDBG Public Services #17 The Children’s Center Therapeutic Preschool Program o CDBG Public Services #20 The Road Home Housing Staffing o ESG Part 1 #2 Family Promise Salt Lake Community Family Shelter o ESG Part 2 #4 The Road Home Homelessness Prevention o HOME #4 South Valley Sanctuary Domestic Violence Survivor Housing Assistance - Disqualified Applications – No applications were disqualified across the four grants this year - Returning Applications without Funding Recommendations – There are seven returning applications that received grant awards in recent years but did not receive funding recommendations this year: o CDBG Public Services #3 Community Development Corporation Housing Counseling o CDBG Public Services #18 The Inn Between End of Life Care and Medical Respite o CDBG Public Services #19 The Road Home Gail Miller Resource Center o CDBG Public Services #25 YWCA Utah Women in Jeopardy Program o ESG Part 1 #1 Catholic Community Services Weigand Homeless Resource Center Client Intake and Operations o ESG Part 1 #7 The Road Home Gail Miller Resource Center o ESG Part 2 #1 Utah Community Action Diversion Program Page | 3 Increasing CDBG Housing Category Funding The chart below compares the annual funding in the housing category of CDBG over seven fiscal years. The Council identified affordable housing as a priority several years ago. The chart shows that a greater amount of CDBG funding has gone to housing in recent years. It’s important to note that the Council’s policy guidance is aligned with increasing CDBG housing funding. The funding over seven fiscal years is $11,799,167 in total assuming the FY2023 recommended amounts are approved by the Council. The funding has gone to several housing assistance programs during this time and some applications have been included every year. Examples of how this funding was used are first time homebuyer assistance, rehabilitation of existing housing, emergency home repairs (large and small), and accessibility improvements. $1,130,000 $1,415,000 $1,050,900 $2,263,557 $1,855,073 $2,035,800 $2,048,837 $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 Total CDBG Housing Funding Comparing Annual Housing Category CDBG Funding FY2017 to FY2023 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Note: FY2023 is funding recommended by the advisory board and Mayor POLICY QUESTIONS 1.Differences between Application Scores and Funding Recommendations – The Council may wish to ask the Administration why the four applications list below with relatively high scores are not recommended for funding. The Council may also wish to ask why ESG Part 1 #2 is recommended for funding while the score is the third lowest in the category. - CDBG Public Services The Road Home applications #19 Gail Miller Resource Center and #22 St. Vincent de Paul Overflow - CDBG Public Services #23 Utah AIDS Foundation Clinical Mental Health (note the applicant also submitted HOPWA #3 for the same program which is recommended for double funding) - ESG Part 1 #7 The Road Home Gail Miller Resource Center (note this is the highest scoring ESG application this year) 2.HAND’s HOME Development Fund (HOME #3) – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration how the HOME Development Fund fits into the Council’s policy goal of the RDA having a “one-stop shop” for affordable housing developers. The HOME Development Fund can be used for property acquisition, new construction, and rehabilitation of existing housing. The Council may also wish to discuss how the HOME Development Fund could better align with the Council’s policy goal and potential changes for the FY2023 funding cycle. 3.Multiple Funding Sources for Ballpark Redevelopment – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration the City’s overall strategy for funding redevelopment of the Ballpark and surrounding area. Multiple funding requests have been or are planned to be presented to the Council for this effort. The total funding of the five requested listed below is $5,781,183. The Administration is currently evaluating public input on the draft Ballpark Station Area Plan and it will be presented to the Planning Commission. The City Council would ultimately review and adopt the plan. Page | 4 - $100,000 RDA Budget Amendment #2 charges and services for consultant work on Ballpark redevelopment efforts - $500,000 pending FY2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) application for Ballpark Station Area Plan Implementation Phase 1 could include technical analyses, public engagement, designs, pedestrian and bicycle connections / crossings, lane redesign of 1300 South, improved alleyways and parking management efforts - $550,000 CDBG Neighborhood Improvements #1 City Transportation Division Ballpark TRAX Accessible Pedestrian Crossing - $1,631,183 RDA Budget Amendment #2 State Street project area Ballpark strategic development holding account - $3 million for improvements to the Ballpark stadium and facilities in capital improvements bond (note the Administration is reviewing the projects in the bond and may forward a new proposal for FY2023) 4.Encouraging Behavioral Health and Mental Health Applications – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how more organizations can be encouraged to and assisted with submitting applications for the new behavioral health goal. This was a new goal under the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan that focuses on providing treatment and support for persons experiencing mental health challenges and substance abuse particularly the ongoing opioid crisis. Four behavioral health applications were submitted this year: - CDBG Public Services #6 First Step House Peer Support Services which is recommended for partial funding - CDBG Public Services Odyssey House applications #9 Residential Treatment Transportation and #10 Transitional Living Program which are not recommended for funding, and - HOPWA #3 Utah AIDS Foundation Mental Health Services which is recommended for double funding 5.Fix the Bricks and HAND’s Housing Rehabilitation and Homebuyer Program (CDBG Housing #4) – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if these funds could provide some or all the 25% match for homeowners to participate in the City’s Fix the Bricks seismic improvements program. It was recently transferred from the Fire Department to HAND. Reviews of applications and completed projects indicate less participation for low- and moderate-income homeowners including on the Westside. ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION Funding Contingencies The advisory boards provided recommendations in case final grant funding amounts from HUD or more or less than the estimated amounts. These funding contingencies are summarized in the table below. The Council may wish to identify which funding contingencies are supported in the event HUD’s confirmation of final funding amounts isn’t available by the scheduled vote on April 19. Grant If MORE Funding Available If LESS Funding Available CDBG Maximize Administration category at 20% and add funding to #15 Shelter the Homeless Resource Center Meals up to the 15% Public Service cap then if funding remains add to Neighborhood Improvements #2 City Transportation Bus Stop Improvements Keep Administration category maximized at 20% and reduce Neighborhood Improvements #2 City Transportation Bus Stop Improvements and Public Services #1 Advantage Services Supportive Employment Program but keep Public Services category at the 15% cap ESG Maximize #1 Administration at 7.5% and add funding equally between #2 Family Promise Salt Lake Community Family Shelter, #3 First Step House Homeless Resource Center Program, #10 Volunteers of America (VOA) Women’s Resource Center, and #11 VOA Youth Resource Center Keep #1 Administration maximized at 7.5% and spread reductions across agencies but maintain $30,000 minimum award HOME Maximize #7 Administration at 10% and add funding to # HOME Development Fund Keep #7 Administration maximized at 10% and reduce #3 HOME Development Fund HOPWA Maximize #5 Administration at 3% and add funding to #4 Utah Community Action Housing Supportive Services up to $235,000, then any remaining funds to #1 Housing Connect Tenant Based Rental Assistance Keep #5 Administration maximized at 3% and reduce #4 Utah Community Action down to $165,000 Page | 5 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan Goals and Strategies The City must report progress to HUD on how funding awards advance the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan goals. In past years, some applicants that received funding were not aligned with the five-year plan. As a result, the services provided by those organizations could not be reported to HUD. If a city does not adequately fund applications advancing the five-year plan then HUD could view the program as underperforming, lower future grant award amounts, and/or audit the city’s program. The below table summarizes the goals and strategies of the current consolidated plan. Goals Strategies Housing: Provide expanded housing options for all economic and demographic segments of Salt Lake City’s population while diversifying housing stock within neighborhoods 1. Support housing programs that address the needs of aging housing stock through targeted rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within the neighborhoods 2. Support affordable housing development that increases the number and types of units available for qualified residents 3. Support programs that provide access to home ownership 4. Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and/or end homelessness 5. Support programs that provide connection to permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs 6. Provide housing and essential supportive services to persons with HIV/AIDS Transportation: Promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal transportation options 1. Within eligible target areas, improve bus stop amenities as a way to encourage the accessibility of public transit and enhance the experience of public transit 2. Within eligible target areas, expand and support the installation of bike racks, stations, and amenities as a way to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation 3. Support access to transportation, prioritizing very low- income and vulnerable populations Community Resiliency: Provide tools to increase economic and/or housing stability 1. Support job training and vocational rehabilitation programs that increase economic mobility 2. Improve visual and physical appearance of deteriorating commercial buildings - limited to CDBG Target Area 3. Provide economic development support for microenterprise businesses 4. Direct financial assistance to for-profit businesses 5. Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement, social development, and change the cycle of poverty 6. Promote digital inclusion through access to digital communication technologies and the internet 7. Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population Homeless Services: Expand access to supportive programs that help ensure homelessness is rare, brief and non- reoccurring 1. Expand support for medical and dental care options for those experiencing homelessness 2. Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency Overflow Operations Page | 6 Goals Strategies 3. Provide support for programs undertaking outreach services to address the needs of those living an unsheltered life 4. Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services Behavioral Health: Provide support for low income and vulnerable populations experiencing behavioral health concerns such as substance abuse disorders and mental health challenges 1. Expand treatment options, counseling support, and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis CDBG Public Infrastructure and Economic Development Target Area in 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan (Attachment 3) The target area creates geographic boundaries for spending CDBG funding on economic development and public infrastructure improvements. These applications are included in the CDBG Neighborhood Improvements category on the funding log. Examples of these project types includes business façade improvement grants, public transit improvements and creation of ADA ramps. The geographic target areas do not apply to housing or public services category applications. Focusing federal grants in these target areas is intended to maximize community impact and stimulate investments from other entities into the neighborhoods. The Council chose the current boundaries to align with Census tracts with relatively higher concentrations of poverty and to overlap with three RDA project areas: North Temple, 9-Line and State Street. Summary of Available Funding by Grant The table below shows funding sources by grant. Note that only the HOME grant program sees some funds returned as program income from loans. When prior year grant awards are recaptured, it means the program or project was unable to use the funding as intended which happens for various reasons. Grant Source Amount HUD Award $ 3,570,517Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)Recaptured Funding $ 1,100,000 HUD Award $ 299,267Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)Recaptured Funding $ 27,000 HUD Award $974,863 Recaptured Funding $ 146,240HOME Investment Partnership Program Income $ 0 HUD Award $840,196Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) Recaptured Funding $ 69,930 Community Development and Block Grant (CDBG) Total CDBG Funding Requests: $7,006,237 (150% of available) Total Available for Allocation: $4,670,517 CDBG funds focus on community development with an emphasis on physical improvements. The Community Development & Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board (CDCIP) submits funding recommendations for this grant. CDBG funds are allocated to organizations in four categories: - City Administration (limited to 20% of the annual grant award) - Housing Page | 7 - Neighborhood Improvements: transportation and economic development infrastructure - Public Services (limited to 15% of the annual grant award) Public Services This category is directed to services for individuals in need and not necessarily to physical improvements. This is typically the most competitive category. Funding is awarded to non-profits and governmental entities that provide programming to meet the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan’s goals. This category is limited to 15% of the annual CDBG award. The Mayor has recommended funding requests that add up to the 15% maximum. If the Council would like to allocate money to any application beyond the Mayor’s recommended funding in this category, then those funds must be shifted from another public services application. Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Total ESG Funding Requests: $1,275,827 (391% of available) Total Available for Allocation: $326,267 ESG funds focus on preventing homelessness and providing services to persons experiencing homelessness. The Community Development & Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board (CDCIP) submits funding recommendations for this grant. ESG funds are allocated to organizations providing services in two categories: - Street Outreach and Emergency Shelter (Part 1) - Homelessness Prevention, Rapid Re-Housing, Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS) (Part 2) HOME Investment Partnership Total HOME Funding Requests: $2,303,485 (205% of available) Total Available for Allocation: $1,121,103 HOME Investment Partnership focuses on expanding the supply of quality affordable housing for moderate- and low-income residents. The Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Advisory Board submits funding recommendations for this grant. This year every applicant received full or partial funding for their request. Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) Total HOPWA Funding Requests: $804,390 (88% of available) Total Available for Allocation: $910,126 HOPWA is the only federal program dedicated entirely to the housing needs of people living with HIV/AIDS. The Housing Trust Fund (HTFAB) Advisory Board submits funding recommendations for this grant. ATTACHMENTS 1. FY 2021-22 Grant Recommendations by Combined Score 2. FY 2021-22 Funding Log 3. CDBG Public Infrastructure and Economic Development Target Area Map for 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan ACRONYMS AMI – Area Median Income CDBG – Community Development Block Grant CDCIP – Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board CIP – Capital Improvement Program ESG – Emergency Solutions Grant FY – Fiscal Year HAND – Housing and Neighborhood Development HOME – HOME Investment Partnership HOPWA – Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS HTFAB – Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board HUD – Housing and Urban Development VOA – Volunteers of America YWCA – Young Women’s Christian Association APPLICANTPROJECT/PROGRAMSCORE REQUEST CDCIP BOARD FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS MAYOR FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS ASSIST Inc. ‐ Community Design Center Emergency Home Repair & Accessibility102.17 700,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ First Step HouseRecovery Residence Rehabilitation99.17 322,000$ 322,000$ 322,000$ Salt Lake City Housing Stability DivisionSmall Repair Program90.50 30,000$ 30,000$30,000$ Salt Lake City Housing Stability DivisionHousing Rehabilitation and HomeBuyer Programs89.83 600,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ International Center for Appropriate and Sustainable Technology Decarbonizing Supportive Housing86.50474,976$ 300,000$ 300,000$ NeighborworksHome Rehabilitation & Improvement86.20200,000$ 196,837$ 196,837$ 2,326,976$ 2,048,837$ 2,048,837$ Salt Lake City Housing Stability DivisionEconomic Development Façade Program (NBIP)97.67 650,000$ 650,000$ 650,000$ Salt Lake City Transportation DivisionTarget Area Bus Stop Improvements93.67 750,000$ 172,000$ 172,000$ Salt Lake City Transportation DivisionBallpark TRAX Accessible Pedestrian Crossing90.17 550,000$ 550,000$ 550,000$ 1,950,000$ 1,372,000$ 1,372,000$ Donated DentalCommunity Dental Project104.17 50,000$ 42,500$42,500$ Advantage ServicesProvisional Supportive Employment Program100.67 85,000$ 55,000$55,000$ Catholic Community Services of UtahCase Manager ‐ Weigand Resource Center98.33 50,000$ 35,000$35,000$ Shelter the HomelessHomeless Resource Center Meals 97.50 136,130$ 57,778$57,778$ First Step HouseEmployment Preparation and Placement 97.33 45,000$ 30,299$30,299$ Transportation DivisionLow Income Transit Passes97.17 45,000$ 30,000$30,000$ Utah AIDS FoundationClinical Mental Health for People with HIV95.17 45,000$ ‐$ ‐$English Skills Learning CenterJob Readiness and Life Skills English Courses 94.50 38,500$ 30,000$30,000$ The Road HomeHousing Staffing94.00 45,950$ 40,000$40,000$ First Step HousePeer Support Services93.83 58,115$ 30,000$30,000$ The Road HomeGail Miller Resource Center89.5080,000$ ‐$ ‐$The Road HomeSt. Vincent de Paul Overflow 89.33 70,000$ ‐$ ‐$International Rescue CommitteeJob Readiness for Refugees 88.00 63,407$ 40,000$40,000$ The Children's Center UtahTherapeutic Preschool Program87.83 110,000$ 55,000$55,000$ Neighborhood House AssociationNeighborhood House Early Education86.67 52,009$ 40,000$40,000$ South Valley SanctuaryDV Case Manager and Housing Assistance85.67 100,000$ 50,000$50,000$ The Road HomeMagnolia Apartments84.33222,000$ ‐$ ‐$Odyssey HouseTransitional Living Program 84.00 84,000$ ‐$ ‐$YWCADV Residential Services83.67172,161$ ‐$ ‐$The INN BetweenEnd of Life Care 81.6796,600$ ‐$ ‐$SLC Bicycle CollectiveBikes for Goodwill80.83 100,000$ ‐$ ‐$CDCUHousing Counseling79.3347,766$ ‐$ ‐$Odyssey HouseResidential Treatment Transportation67.83 60,000$ ‐$ ‐$Wasatch Community GardensGreen Team Program64.83 58,520$ ‐$ ‐$The GERA Refugee Community Self Help 53.33 100,000$ ‐$ ‐$2,015,159$ 535,577$ 535,577$CDBG PUBLIC SERVICES2022-23 Federal Grant Funding Board RecommendationsCATEGORYESTIMATED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT - $4,670,517 (CDBG Public Services cannot exceed $535,577)CDBG HOUSINGCDBG NEIGH IMPROVEMENTAttachment 1 Grant Recommendations by Combined ScorePage 1 Salt Lake City Attorney's OfficeReview of Legal Documentsn/a 28,564$ 28,564$ 28,564$ Salt Lake City Finance DepartmentProcessing of Payments, Financial Trackingn/a 64,270$ 64,270$ 64,270$ Salt Lake City Housing Stability DivisionAdministration of Grant Programsn/a 621,269$ 621,269$ 621,269$ 714,103$ 714,103$ 714,103$ 7,006,238$ 4,670,517$ 4,670,517$ APPLICANTPROJECT/PROGRAMSCORE REQUEST CDCIP BOARD FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS MAYOR FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS The Road Home TRH St. Vincent de Paul Overflow ‐ ESG98.50 30,000$ ‐$ ‐$ Volunteers of America, Utah Youth Resource Center98.17 75,000$ 45,047$ 45,047$ Volunteers of America, Utah Geraldine E. King Women's Resource Center98.17 108,000$ 64,846$ 64,846$ First Step House First Step House Resource Center Program (RCP)97.33 60,000$ 36,046$ 36,046$ Catholic Community Services of Utah Client Intake‐Weigand Homeless Resource Center96.67 50,000$ ‐$ ‐$ The Road Home Street Outreach ‐ ESG93.83 50,000$ ‐$ ‐$ The Road Home Gail Miller Homeless Resource Center ‐ ESG93.67 80,000$ ‐$ ‐$ Shelter The HomelessHomeless Resource Centers Utilities ‐ ESG93.00 88,000$ ‐$ ‐$ Family Promise Salt Lake Community Family Shelter86.00 56,984$ 30,046$ 30,046$ Soap2Hope Street Outreach Program84.00 295,280$ ‐$ ‐$ Valley Behavioral HealthStorefront/SafeHaven Case Manager84.00 62,000$ ‐$ ‐$ 955,264$ 175,985$ 175,985$ The Road HomeRapid Re‐housing 103.17 86,360$ 51,816$ 51,816$ The Road HomeHomelessness Prevention101.83 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ Utah Community ActionRapid‐Rehousing 95.00 121,974$ 46,021$ 46,021$ Utah Community Action Diversion Program94.50 59,784$ ‐$ ‐$ Salt Lake City Housing Stability DivisionESG Administrationn/a 22,445$ 22,445$ 22,445$ 320,563$ 150,282$ 150,282$ 1,275,827$ 326,267$ 326,267$ CDBG ADMINCATEGORYEMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT - $326,267(Shelter Operations cannot exceed $179,560)PART 2: HOMELESS PREVENTION RAPID REHOUSING & ADMINPART 1:SHELTER OPERATIONSAttachment 1 Grant Recommendations by Combined ScorePage 2 APPLICANTPROJECT/PROGRAMSCORE REQUEST HTF BOARD FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS MAYOR FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS The Road Home Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program101.00 300,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ Utah Community Action Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program97.40 177,699$ 167,669$ 167,669$ South Valley SanctuaryDV Survivor Housing Assistance89.60 138,500$ 138,500$ 138,500$ Salt Lake City Housing Stability DivisionHOME Development Fund95.80 900,000$ 317,448$ 317,448$ Community Development Corporation of UtahDown Payment Assistance86.60 374,800$ 200,000$ 200,000$ NeighborWorks Affordable Home Buydown Program69.00 315,000$ ‐$ ‐$ Salt Lake City Housing Stability DivisionHOME Administrationn/a 97,486$ 97,486$ 97,486$ 2,303,485$ 1,121,103$ 1,121,103$ APPLICANTPROJECT/PROGRAMSCORE REQUEST HTF BOARD FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS MAYOR FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Utah Community Action Housing Info/STRMU/PHP/Supportive Services102.20 165,000$ 195,736$ 195,736$ Housing ConnectTenant Based Rental Assistance102.20 519,185$ 519,185$ 519,185$ Utah Aids Foundation Supportive Services98.00 45,000$ 70,000$ 70,000$ Utah Aids Foundation Mental Health Services97.80 50,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ Salt Lake City Housing Stability DivisionHOPWA Administrationn/a 21,000$ 25,205$ 25,205$ 800,185$ 910,126$ 910,126$ HOMECATEGORYHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PERSONS WITH AIDS - $910,126HOPWACATEGORYHOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM - $1,121,103Attachment 1 Grant Recommendations by Combined ScorePage 3 Estimated 2022-2023 Funding Available: 4,670,517$ Category Maximum Allocated Balance 2022-2023 Admin (20%):714,103$ 714,103$ -$ 2022-2023 Public Services (15%):535,577$ 535,577$ -$ 1 Attorney's Office FY21-22 29,827$ REQUEST:28,564$ FY20-21 29,869$ CDCIP:28,564$ FY19-20 24,427$ MAYOR:28,564$ FY18-19 25,090$ COUNCIL:28,564$ FY17-18 24,369$ 5 YR TOTAL 133,582$ 2 Finance Department FY21-22 60,989$ REQUEST:64,270$ FY20-21 61,035$ CDCIP:64,270$ FY19-20 54,565$ MAYOR:64,270$ FY18-19 56,047$ COUNCIL:64,270$ FY17-18 56,047$ 5 YR TOTAL 288,683$ 3 FY21-22 611,016$ REQUEST:621,269$ FY20-21 610,929$ CDCIP:621,269$ FY19-20 607,799$ MAYOR:621,269$ FY18-19 624,299$ COUNCIL:621,269$ FY17-18 566,616$ 5 YR TOTAL 3,020,659$ REQUEST:714,103$ CDCIP:714,103$ MAYOR:714,103$ COUNCIL:714,103$ 20.0% Funding for salaries and operational expenses of Housing Stability to administer and monitor the federal grants and to conduct the community processes. SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2022/2023 APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN% OF GRANT AWARD FUNDING CAPS AS REQUIRED BY FEDERAL REGULATION CITY ADMINISTRATION Partial funding for staff salary to provide contract administration for federal grants. Partial funding for staff salary to provide financial administration and accounting services for federal grants. Housing Stability Division Note: 20% is the maximum amount allowed. Will auto adjust to 20% when SLC receives HUD award CITY ADMINISTRATION TOTAL 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 1 1 ASSIST, Inc. FY21-22 700,000$ REQUEST:700,000$ FY20-21 391,373$ CDCIP:700,000$ FY19-20 391,000$ MAYOR:700,000$ FY18-19 320,000$ COUNCIL:700,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 330,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 2,132,373$ 2 First Step House New REQUEST:322,000$ Recovery Residence Rehabilitation CDCIP:322,000$ MAYOR:322,000$ COUNCIL:322,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: 3 New REQUEST:474,976$ CDCIP:300,000$ MAYOR:300,000$ COUNCIL:300,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: 4 FY21-22 600,000$ REQUEST:600,000$ FY20-21 485,600$ CDCIP:500,000$ FY19-20 439,873$ MAYOR:500,000$ FY18-19 577,542$ COUNCIL:500,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 565,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 2,668,015$ 5 Salt Lake City - Housing Stability Division FY21-22 60,000$ REQUEST:30,000$ FY20-21 60,000$ CDCIP:30,000$ Salt Lake City Small Repair Program FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:30,000$ FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 60,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 180,000$ 6 Neighborworks of Salt Lake New REQUEST:200,000$ CDCIP:196,837$ Home Rehabilitation & Improvement MAYOR:196,837$ COUNCIL:196,837$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: REQUEST:2,326,976$ CDCIP:2,048,837$ MAYOR:2,048,837$ COUNCIL:2,048,837$ PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN% OF GRANT AWARD Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Supporting salaries, operational, and rehabilitation activities including plumbing, heating & electrical, radon testing/mitigation, roof repair, accessibility ramps, and accessibility design projects, etc. 102.17 Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. Funds for critical rehabilitation at 4 recovery residences (transitional housing) for sober living. 86.50 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 99.17 Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 HOUSING Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 89.83 Housing: Support programs that provide access to home ownership via down payment assistance, and/or housing subsidy, and/or financing. Emergency Home Repair & Accessibility and Community Design APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME International Center for Appropriate and Sustainable Technology (ICAST) Rehabilitate Safe Haven supportive housing apartment complex, by replacing gas heating with very high-efficiency heating and hot water systems. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Decarbonizing Supportive Housing Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. Salt Lake City Housing Rehabilitation and Homebuyer Program Salt Lake City - Housing Stability Division Salaries and operational support for the Housing Rehab, Welcome Home SLC Homebuyer, Handyman, and West Side Node Improvement projects. Organization also submitted a similar application for HOME #3 90.50 86.20 Housing: Expand housing support for aging resident that ensure access to continued stable housing. Home Rehabilitation & Improvement (NHRI) will provide grants and loans to low-to-moderate income Salt Lake City homeowners to fund necessary repairs and improvements to their home. Grants will be issued up to $10,000 and loans up to $25,000. Organization also submitted a similar application for HOME #2 which includes rehabilitation and housing development Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. HOUSING TOTAL 49.8% 43.9% 43.9% 43.87% Targeting qualifying seniors and persons with disabilities to provide small dollar value services for home improvement and service or repair. Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 2 1 New REQUEST:550,000$ CDCIP:550,000$ MAYOR:550,000$ COUNCIL:550,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: 2 FY21-22 322,000$ REQUEST:750,000$ FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:172,000$ FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:172,000$ FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:172,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 -$ 5 YR TOTAL 322,000$ 3 Salt Lake City - Housing Stability Division FY21-22 502,000$ REQUEST:650,000$ FY20-21 425,883$ CDCIP:650,000$ FY19-20 319,642$ MAYOR:650,000$ FY18-19 425,000$ COUNCIL:650,000$ FY17-18 200,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 1,872,525$ REQUEST:1,950,000$ CDCIP:1,372,000$ MAYOR:1,372,000$ COUNCIL:1,372,000$ Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Transportation: Improve bus stop amenities as a way to encourage the accessibility of public transit and enhance the experience of public transit in target areas. 41.8% 29.4% Construction of 2 ADA-compliant crosswalks on 1300 South, in either direction, to the Ballpark TRAX transit stop. 93.67Construction of multiple ADA-compliant bus stops and/or transit-critical crosswalks in the Consolidated Plan target areas, to include bus shelters, benches, trash cans, and bike racks as appropriate. Ballpark TRAX Accessible Pedestrian Crossing Community Resiliency: Economic Development efforts via supporting the improvement and visibility of small businesses through façade improvement programs. REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN% OF GRANT AWARD Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 90.17 Transportation: Expand and support the installation of bike racks, stations, and amenities as a way to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation. 29.4% 29.4% APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS Salt Lake City - Transportation Division Salt Lake City - Transportation Division Target Area Bus Stop Improvements Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS: TRANSPORTATION & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFASTRUCTURE - SUBJECT TO TARGET AREA - SEE ATTACHMENT 3 OF STAFF REPORT FOR MAP Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 97.67Neighborhood Business Improvement Program (NBIP) Provide grant money to businesses for facade improvements, focusing on small businesses and target areas. Small local businesses may receive up to $25,000 in grants for building façade improvements visible from the street NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS: TRANSPORTATION & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFASTRUCTURE TOTAL Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 3 1 FY21-22 60,250$ REQUEST:85,000$ FY20-21 64,809$ CDCIP:55,000$ FY19-20 68,884$ MAYOR:55,000$ FY18-19 55,000$ COUNCIL:55,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 30,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 278,943$ 2 Catholic Community Services of Utah New REQUEST:50,000$ CDCIP:35,000$ MAYOR:35,000$ COUNCIL:35,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: 3 Community Development Corporation FY21-22 74,800$ REQUEST:$47,766 Housing Counseling FY20-21 68,100$ CDCIP:-$ FY19-20 67,447$ MAYOR:-$ FY18-19 70,500$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 70,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 350,847$ 4 English Skills Learning Center FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:38,500$ FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:30,000$ FY19-20 30,000$ MAYOR:30,000$ FY18-19 30,000$ COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 -$ 5 YR TOTAL 60,000$ 5 First Step House FY21-22 41,700$ REQUEST:45,000$ FY20-21 47,000$ CDCIP:30,299$ FY19-20 30,000$ MAYOR:30,299$ FY18-19 COUNCIL:30,299$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 5 YR TOTAL 118,700$ 6 First Step House FY21-22 48,000$ REQUEST:58,115$ FY20-21 50,000$ CDCIP:30,000$ FY19-20 38,806$ MAYOR:30,000$ FY18-19 30,000$ COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 36,833$ 5 YR TOTAL 203,639$ 7 International Rescue Committee FY21-22 54,400$ REQUEST:63,407$ FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:40,000$ FY19-20 44,629$ MAYOR:40,000$ FY18-19 COUNCIL:40,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 5 YR TOTAL 99,029$ Provide case management services to individuals experiencing homelessness at the Weigand Homeless Resource Center. Organization also submitted a similar application for ESG Part 1 #1 Peer Support Services Digital Skills & Education Access to Build Resiliency Refugees and New Americans Funds will facilitate Digital Inclusion staff to support refugee and other new Americans access/learn digital technology skills, critical to improving their economic and housing stability. Employment Preparation and Placement (EPP) Program Salaries and administrative costs for Peer Support Services (PSS) Program which provides peer-based supportive services, delivered by certified Peer Support Specialists. Community Resiliency: Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement, social development, and change the cycle of poverty. Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational training programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 88.00 97.33 Housing: Support programs that provide access to home ownership Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Provisional Supportive Employment Program 98.33 100.67Provide employment opportunities to homeless individuals or formerly homeless. Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational training programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations. 93.83 Case Manager-Weigand Homeless Resource Center APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED % OF GRANT AWARDPROJECT DESCRIPTION 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN PUBLIC SERVICES Provide housing counseling classes and help connect individuals and families with public resources and information on fair housing, fair lending and accessibility rights. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Bring free and accessible content-based English language instruction to adult immigrants and refugees living at or below the poverty line. Provide supportive employment services to high-risk, high-need individuals in our community caught in the cycles of relapse, mental illness, incarceration, homelessness, and unemployment. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 94.50 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Empowering Parents with English, Digital, Financial, and Family Literacy 79.33 Homeless Services: Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Advantage Services, Inc Formerly Valley Services Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options, counseling support, and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis. Community Resiliency: Promote digital inclusion through access to digital communication technologies and the internet. Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 4 8 Neighborhood House Association FY21-22 38,449$ REQUEST:52,009$ FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:40,000$ FY19-20 36,867$ MAYOR:40,000$ FY18-19 33,858$ COUNCIL:40,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 30,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 139,174$ 9 Odyssey House New REQUEST:60,000 CDCIP:-$ MAYOR:-$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: 10 Odyssey House New REQUEST:84,000 CDCIP:-$ MAYOR:-$ COUNCIL:-$ 11 New REQUEST:100,000$ CDCIP:-$ MAYOR:-$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: 12 Salt Lake City Bicycle Collective New REQUEST:100,000$ CDCIP:-$ MAYOR:-$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: 13 Salt Lake City Division of Transportation FY21-22 34,700$ REQUEST:45,000$ FY20-21 45,000$ CDCIP:30,000$ FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:30,000$ FY18-19 45,000$ COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 30,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 154,700$ 14 Salt Lake Donated Dental Services FY21-22 44,400$ REQUEST:50,000$ FY20-21 44,000$ CDCIP:42,500$ FY19-20 48,510$ MAYOR:42,500$ FY18-19 30,000$ COUNCIL:42,500$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 30,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 196,910$ Homelessness Prevention & Employment Assistance Program Provide free bicycle transportation to low-income communities, offer technical training to become a skilled bicycle mechanic, and creates a safe space for marginalized and underrepresented people to comfortably work on their own bicycles. 86.67 67.83 84.00 53.33 97.17 104.17 Bikes for Goodwill Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Neighborhood House Early Education Transitional Living Program Assistance for families with childcare as they search for and maintain employment. Funds will support early education teacher salaries and benefits. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Low Income Transit Passes Transportation: Support access to transportation prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations. Greater Equatoria Region Association (GERA) Provide affordable transportation to individuals experiencing homelessness in Salt Lake City. The program partners with local social service providers to provide transit passes to their clients at no cost to overcome transportation barriers. Procurement of three vehicles for staff to assist clients with the following appointments: Odyssey House primarily provides transportation for medical, legal, Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS) appointments, school, grocery shopping, recreational therapy, etc. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Salaries, supplies, and lab fees for Community Dental Project, to support homeless and low-income individuals with dental services. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114Community Dental Project Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Assist refugee and immigrant clients with the following services: negotiating with a landlord, supporting opportunities for housing, providing emergency rent assistance, and utilities support. 80.83 Residential Treatment Transportation Staff increase for Odyssey House’s Transitional Living program which provides affordable, temporary housing for low to moderate-income families who recently graduated from Odyssey House or other treatment programs. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Transportation: Support access to transportation prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations. Homeless Services: Expand support for medical and dental care options for those experiencing homelessness. Community Resiliency: Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement, social development, and change the cycle of poverty. Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options, counseling support, and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis. Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options, counseling support, and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis. Community Resiliency: Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population. Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 5 15 Shelter The Homeless Committee Inc FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:136,130$ FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:57,778$ FY19-20 MAYOR:57,778$ FY18-19 COUNCIL:57,778$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 5 YR TOTAL -$ 16 South Valley Sanctuary FY21-22 100,000$ REQUEST:100,000$ FY20-21 30,000$ CDCIP:50,000$ FY19-20 -MAYOR:50,000$ FY18-19 -COUNCIL:50,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 - 5 YR TOTAL 130,000$ 17 The Children's Center New REQUEST:110,000$ Therapeutic Preschool Program CDCIP:55,000$ MAYOR:55,000$ COUNCIL:55,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: 18 The Inn Between FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:96,600$ End of Life Care and Medical Respite FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:-$ FY19-20 45,599$ MAYOR:-$ FY18-19 45,543$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 33,125$ 5 YR TOTAL 124,267$ 19 The Road Home FY21-22 72,000$ REQUEST:80,000$ FY20-21 CDCIP:-$ FY19-20 MAYOR:-$ FY18-19 COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 5 YR TOTAL 72,000$ 20 The Road Home New REQUEST:45,950$ CDCIP:40,000$ MAYOR:40,000$ COUNCIL:40,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: 21 The Road Home New REQUEST:222,000$ CDCIP:-$ MAYOR:-$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: Community Resiliency: Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement, social development, and change the cycle of poverty. Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow operations. 97.50 85.67Domestic Violence Case Manager and Housing Assistance Magnolia Apartments 94.00 84.33 Housing Staffing Homeless Resource Centers Meals Homeless Services: Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services. 87.83 Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow operations. This program provides treatment for preschool-aged children, who have been the victims of assault or trauma, and who are struggling to succeed in childcare or preschool. Follow up with intensive group therapy to gain resilience and learn essential skills. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Pay for partial meal costs of the two Salt Lake City Homeless Resource Centers. Costs will cover lunch and dinner costs for meal prep and delivery. While this application is focused on meals it overlaps with several other applications for operations and essential services at the Women's Resource Center and Gail Miller Resource Center Domestic Violence Case Manager salary, benefits, mileage and client rental assistance. Organization also submitted a similar application for HOME #4 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Onsite case managers provide supportive services to individuals to help them maintain their housing and avoid exiting to homelessness. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 81.67 89.50 The housing navigation staff work at four of the resource centers and coordinate with other service providers to serve households referred into the program. While this application is focused on housing assistance staffing it overlaps with several other applications for operations and essential services at homeless resource centers Gail Miller Resource Center Provides homeless individuals who need hospice or other end of life care and temporary medical respite housing for homeless individuals experiencing a medical crisis. Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow operations. Homeless Services: Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services. The Gail Miller Resource Center provides emergency shelter to men and women experiencing homelessness in Salt Lake County. Shelter is available 24/7, 365 days each year. Organization also submitted a similar application for ESG Part 1 #7 Homeless Services: Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services. Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 6 22 The Road Home FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:70,000$ FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:-$ FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:-$ FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 -$ 5 YR TOTAL -$ 23 Utah AIDS Foundation New REQUEST:45,000$ CDCIP:-$ MAYOR:-$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: 24 Wasatch Community Gardens New REQUEST:58,520$ CDCIP:-$ MAYOR:-$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: 25 YWCA Utah FY21-22 33,900$ REQUEST:172,161$ FY20-21 58,285$ CDCIP:-$ FY19-20 58,285$ MAYOR:-$ FY18-19 51,260$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy: FY17-18 34,971$ 5 YR TOTAL 236,701$ REQUEST:2,015,158$ CDCIP:535,577$ MAYOR:535,577$ COUNCIL:535,577$ Provides farm-based employment, work readiness training, job placement assistance, and mentoring for women facing and/or experiencing homelessness. Request for One-time expenses related to farm move including partial soil removal and disposal, Geotextile layer, Importing clean soil, and palletizing and moving supplies. The City's General Fund previously contributed approximately $125,000 annually to this program. Several RDA-owned properties are expected to be part of an upcoming redevelopment Request for Proposals Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational training programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114Women in Jeopardy Program Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow operations. 89.33 95.17 64.83 83.67 Housing: Provide housing and essential supportive services to persons with HIV/AIDS 15.0% 15.0% 56.4% Note: 15% is the maximum amount allowed per HUD regulations PUBLIC SERVICES TOTAL Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114St. Vincent de Paul Overflow Respond to a persistent need among clients living with HIV and AIDS for increased access to behavioral health counseling that specifically targets the needs of their population. Organization also submitted a similar application for HOPWA #3 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 The winter shelter provides overflow services during the coldest months of the year to individuals who are unlikely to seek traditional shelter, due to barriers. Organization also submitted a similar application for ESG Part 1 #6 Green Team Program Clinical Mental Health Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow operations. 15.0% YWCA’s secure, emergency shelter offers 36 onsite and 4 overflow units to victims left homeless due to domestic violence. Provide salary and benefits for essential shelter staffing infrastructure. Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 7 FUND REQUEST Housing 2,326,976$ Neighborhood Improvements: Transp & ED 1,950,000$ Public Services 2,015,158$ Administration 714,103$ TOTAL FUNDS REQUESTED:7,006,237$ If a decrease in funding: Administration Staff Analysis: 71-46099 $391,846.69 71-45099 $708,153.31 Total:$1,100,000.00 Total:-$ PROGRAM INCOME: For Finance Purposes Only: -$ Maximize admin at 20%, then allocate additional funding to Shelter The Homeless Homeless Center Resource Meals up to 15% Public Services Cap, allocate remaining funds to Transportation Bus Stop Improvements COUNCIL: 4,670,517$ FUND AVAILABILITY ESTIMATED GRANT AWARD:3,570,517$ REALLOCATION: -$ MAYOR: 4,670,517$ CDCIP: CDCIP: Community Development & Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP ) Board Recommendation: 1,100,000$ TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE:4,670,517$ REALLOCATION FUNDING: -$ TOTALS 4,670,517$ AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATIONMaximize admin at 20%, reduce funding from Transportation Bus Stop Improvements, reduce funding in Public Services from Advantage Services, but keep PS at 15% cap FUNDS ALLOCATED MAYOR: If an increase in funding: COUNCIL: Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 8 175,985$ Max Allowed for Part 1:179,560$ 127,837$ 326,267$ 1 Catholic Community Services FY21-22 41,000$ REQUEST:50,000$ FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:-$ FY19-20 30,000$ MAYOR:-$ FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: FY17-18 30,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 101,000$ 2 Family Promise Salt Lake New REQUEST:56,984$ Community Family Shelter CDCIP:30,046$ MAYOR:30,046$ COUNCIL:30,046$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: 3 First Step House FY21-22 49,250$ REQUEST:60,000$ FY20-21 60,000$ CDCIP:36,046$ FY19-20 50,000$ MAYOR:36,046$ COUNCIL:36,046$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: 5 YR TOTAL 159,250$ 4 Shelter the Homeless FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:88,000$ FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:-$ MAYOR:-$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: 5 YR TOTAL -$ 5 Soap2Hope New REQUEST:295,280$ CDCIP:-$ MAYOR:-$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: 5 YR TOTAL -$ 6 The Road Home FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:30,000$ FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:-$ FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:-$ FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: FY17-18 -$ 5 YR TOTAL -$ 7 The Road Home FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:80,000$ FY20-21 -$ CDCIP:-$ FY19-20 40,000$ MAYOR:-$ FY18-19 66,384$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: FY17-18 58,123$ 5 YR TOTAL 164,507$ 8 The Road Home New REQUEST:50,000$ CDCIP:-$ MAYOR:-$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: 98.50 Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource center, or overflow operations Street Outreach Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource center, or overflow operations Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 93.83Provide outreach services to families experiencing homelessness across Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County. Outreach workers will locate homeless families and connect them to school systems for their children, benefits, and housing.Homeless Services: Homeless outreach programs Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 93.00Homeless Resource Center Utilities First Step House will provide on-site behavioral health assessment, referral, and peer support services to individuals at the Men's Homeless Resource Center. SALT LAKE CITY ESG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2022/2023 APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME REQUEST/RECOMMENDED % OF GRANT AWARD Part 1 Funding: Street Outreach and Emergency Shelter: Part 2 Funding: Homelessness Prevention, RRH, HMIS, and Admin: 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 96.67 Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource center, or overflow operations 2022-2023 Funding Available: PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS PART 1: STREET OUTREACH AND EMERGENCY SHELTER Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Operational support for the Weigand Homeless Resource Center, a day shelter for individuals experiencing homelessness. Organization also submitted a similar application for CDBG Public Services #2 The FPSL family shelter program utilizes 12 Salt Lake Valley buildings to shelter homeless families. Each shelter location houses 3-4 families at a time for one week at a time. Homeless Resource Center Program Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource center, or overflow operations Operational expenses for St. Vincent's de Paul Dining Hall as overflow winter emergency shelter. Organization also submitted a similar application for CDBG Public Services #22 Shelter the Homeless (STH) is requesting ESG funding to assist with the utilities for the two new Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs) in SLC. The program’s primary goal is to provide street-based services to people living on the street. By providing outreach services to high risk individuals. 93.67 84.00 Emergency Shelter - St. Vincent's Overflow Shelter Gail Miller Resource Center Soap2Hope Street Outreach Program Homeless Services: Homeless outreach programs Provide support for essential shelter services, including case management and transportation. Also supporting shelter operations, maintenance, rent, supplies, utilities, insurance, security, fuel, and equipment. Organization also submitted a similar application for CDBG Public Services #19 97.33 Weigand Homeless Resource Center Client Intake/Operations Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource center, or overflow operations 86.00 Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource center, or overflow operations Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 9 9 Valley Behavioral Health New REQUEST:62,000$ CDCIP:-$ MAYOR:-$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: 10 Volunteers of America, Utah FY21-22 30,000$ REQUEST:108,000$ FY20-21 38,000$ CDCIP:64,846$ MAYOR:64,846$ COUNCIL:64,846$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: 5 YR TOTAL 38,000$ 11 Volunteers of America, Utah FY21-22 44,000$ REQUEST:75,000$ FY20-21 46,000$ CDCIP:45,047$ FY19-20 44,115$ MAYOR:45,047$ FY18-19 60,000$ COUNCIL:45,047$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: FY17-18 45,992$ 5 YR TOTAL 240,107$ REQUEST:955,264$ 319.20% CDCIP:175,985$ 58.81%Max 60% MAYOR:175,985$ 58.81%Max 60% COUNCIL:175,985$ 58.81%Max 60% 1 FY21-22 40,000$ REQUEST:59,784$ FY20-21 30,000$ CDCIP:-$ FY19-20 53,000$ MAYOR:-$ FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Objective: FY17-18 -$ 5 YR TOTAL 123,000$ 2 FY21-22 82,022$ REQUEST:121,974$ FY20-21 30,000$ CDCIP:46,021$ FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:46,021$ FY18-19 30,000$ COUNCIL:46,021$ Consolidated Plan Objective: FY17-18 32,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 174,022$ 3 The Road Home FY21-22 -$ REQUEST:86,360$ FY20-21 40,765$ CDCIP:51,816$ FY19-20 84,077$ MAYOR:51,816$ FY18-19 85,382$ COUNCIL:51,816$ Consolidated Plan Objective: FY17-18 85,508$ 5 YR TOTAL 295,732$ 4 The Road Home New REQUEST:30,000$ CDCIP:30,000$ MAYOR:30,000$ COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Objective: REQUEST:298,118$ CDCIP:127,837$ MAYOR:127,837$ COUNCIL:127,837$ Operational and essential services of the Volunteers of America (VOA) Youth Resource Center, which serves homeless and at risk teens age 15- 22. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 98.17Homeless Youth Resource Center Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource center, or overflow operations Operational and service expenses for the Geraldine E. King Women's Resource Center. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 98.17Geraldine King Women's Resource Center Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource center, or overflow operations Case management support for homeless and formerly homeless persons, who have mental and behavioral health needs. Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 84.00Storefront/SafeHaven Case Manager Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource center, or overflow operations Provide assistance with housing costs for families facing financial burderns and temporary loss of income, to prevent re-entry into homelessness, and maintain their housing. STREET OUTREACH AND EMERGENCY SHELTER TOTAL Rapid Re-housing Program Salt Lake Community Action dba Utah Community Action Salt Lake Community Action dba Utah Community Action *FUNDING FOR PART 1 CANNOT EXCEED $179,560 PART 2: HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION, RAPID RE-HOUSING, AND HMIS Diversion Program Diversion program support in the form of salaries and operational support. Diversion is a light-touch approach working to find safe, alternatives for clients to remain in housing rather than entering into shelter. Housing Programs: Rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Combined Admin & CDCIP Score: Maximum score: 114 Rapid Re-Housing Program Housing Programs: Rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance Provide case management support for individuals experiencing homelessness through deposit and rental assistance and holistic case management. Organization also submitted a similar application for HOME #6 94.50 95.00 101.83 Housing Programs: Rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance Salary support for case managers in The Road Home’s Rapid Re-housing Program working with participants, combined with short-term rental assistance. Organization also submitted a similar application for HOME #5 103.17 Housing Programs: Rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance HOMELESS PREVENTION & RAPID REHOUSING & HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (HMIS) TOTAL Homelessness Prevention Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 10 1 Salt Lake City Corporation FY21-22 22,630$ REQUEST:22,445$ FY20-21 22,446$ CDCIP:22,445$ FY19-20 21,843$ MAYOR:22,445$ FY18-19 21,659$ COUNCIL:22,445$ FY17-18 18,666$ 5 YR TOTAL 107,244$ REQUEST:1,275,827$ CDCIP:326,267$ MAYOR:326,267$ COUNCIL:326,267$ 1,275,827$ AVAILABLE TO ALLOCATE: Estimated 22-23 GRANT AWARD:299,267$ CDCIP BOARD:326,267$ -$ REALLOCATION:27,000$ MAYOR:326,267$ -$ TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $ 326,267 COUNCIL:326,267$ -$ If an increase in funding Maximize admin at 7.5%, and give ESG Part 1 agencies (VOA Youth Resource Center, VOA Women's Resource Center, First Step House Resource Center, and Family Promise Community Family Shelter) funding spread out equally amongst the selected four agencies, up to the ESG Part 1 cap. If a decrease in funding Maximize admin at 7.5%, and spread the decrease across the agencies as long as it doesn't go under $30,000 per award. 72-62197 27,000.00$ Total:27,000.00$ Community Development & Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP ) Board Recommendation: AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION:FUNDS ALLOCATED: Requested Funds 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% For Finance Purposes Only:Administration Staff Analysis: ADMINISTRATION REALLOCATION FUNDING: HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION, RAPID RE-HOUSING, HMIS, AND ADMINISTRATION Program Administration To provide management, oversight, and monitoring of the ESG program. Administration: 7.5% of ESG allocation. Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 11 Estimated 2022-2023 Funding Available:1,121,103$ Available to Allocate -$ 1 FY21-22 200,000$ REQUEST:374,800$ FY20-21 200,000$ HTFAB:200,000$ Down Payment Assistance FY19-20 200,000$ MAYOR:200,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: FY18-19 200,000$ COUNCIL:200,000$ FY17-18 150,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 950,000$ 2 Neighborworks New REQUEST:315,000$ Affordable Home Buydown Program HTFAB:-$ MAYOR:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: COUNCIL:-$ 3 Salt Lake City Corporation FY21-22 984,634$ REQUEST:900,000$ Home Development Fund FY20-21 1,066,667$ HTFAB:317,448$ FY19-20 939,266$ MAYOR:317,448$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: FY18-19 1,061,368$ COUNCIL:317,448$ FY17-18 798,221$ 5 YR TOTAL 4,850,156$ 4 South Valley Sanctuary New REQUEST:138,500$ Combined Admin & HTFAB Score: HTFAB:138,500$ DV Survivor Housing Assistance MAYOR:138,500$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: COUNCIL:138,500$ 5 The Road Home FY21-22 200,000$ REQUEST:300,000$ TBRA program FY20-21 200,000$ HTFAB:200,000$ FY19-20 200,000$ MAYOR:200,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: FY18-19 200,000$ COUNCIL:200,000$ FY17-18 200,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 1,000,000$ 6 Utah Community Action FY21-22 167,669$ REQUEST:177,699$ TBRA Program FY20-21 70,000$ HTFAB:167,669$ FY19-20 70,000$ MAYOR:167,669$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: FY18-19 70,000$ COUNCIL:167,669$ FY17-18 70,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 447,669$ Direct aid in the form of grants/loans not to exceed each to first-time low- and-moderate-income (LMI) home buyers in Salt Lake City for down payment assistance. Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition, new construction, and rehabilitation of existing housing. Organization also submitted a similar application for CDBG Housing #6 which is limited to rehabilitation Combined Admin & HTFAB Score: Maximum Score: 114 86.60 69.00 Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide access to home ownership via down paiyment assistance and/or housing subsidy and/or financing. Housing Programs: Housing development that increases the nummber of units available for income eligible residents (Acquistion, New Construction). Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition, new construction, and rehabilitation of existing housing. Organization also submitted a similar application for CDBG Housing #4 89.60 Housing Programs: Housing development that increases the nummber of units available for income eligible residents (Acquistion, New Construction). 95.80Combined Admin & HTFAB Score: Maximum Score: 114 97.40 Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance. 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN SALT LAKE CITY HOME PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2022/2023 REQUEST/ RECOMMENDEDAPPLICANT/PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS Community Development Corporation of Utah Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance. Combined Admin & HTFAB Score: Maximum Score: 114 101.00 Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance. Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) for eligible clients in The Road Home's Rapid Re-housing Program. Organization also submitted a similar application for ESG Part 2 #3 Tenant Based Rental Assistance for survivors of domestic violence (DV). Organization also submitted a similar application for CDBG Public Services #16 Combined Admin & HTFAB Score: Maximum Score: 114 Operational support, direct client rental assistance through Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization also submitted a similar application for ESG Part 2 #2 Combined Admin & HTFAB Score: Maximum Score: 114 Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 12 7 Salt Lake City Corporation FY21-22 97,486$ REQUEST:97,486$ Program Administration FY20-21 95,750$ HTFAB:97,486$ FY19-20 88,507$ MAYOR:97,486$ FY18-19 99,994$ COUNCIL:97,486$ FY17-18 71,357$ 10% of Home Allocation 5 YR TOTAL 453,094$ 10% of HOME Award:97,486$ REQUEST:2,303,485$ HTFAB:1,121,103$ MAYOR:1,121,103$ COUNCIL:1,121,103$ Estimated 22-23 GRANT AWARD:974,863$ PROGRAM INCOME:-$ REALLOCATION:146,240.00$ TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE:1,121,103$ If an increase in funding Maximize admin at 10%, then award the additional funds to SLC HOME Development Fund If a decrease in funding Maximize admin at 10% and reduce funds from SLC HOME Development Fund 72-62198 146,240.00$ Total:146,240.00$ Total:-$ COUNCIL: For Finance Purposes Only: REALLOCATION FUNDING: HOUSING TRUST FUND ADVISORY BOARD (HTFAB): -$ -$ -$ PROGRAM INCOME: MAYOR: FUND AVAILABILITY:AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION: Funding to administer the HOME program (10% of the total HOME allocation). TOTAL HTF Board Recommendation: Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation Administration Staff Analysis: Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 13 Estimated 2022-2023 Funding Available: 910,126$ Available to Allocate -$ 1 Housing Connect FY21-22 489,332$ REQUEST:519,185$ Tenant Based Rental Assistance FY20-21 510,797$ HTFAB:519,185$ FY19-20 438,020$ MAYOR:519,185$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: FY18-19 321,015$ COUNCIL:519,185$ FY17-18 297,102$ 5 YR TOTAL 2,056,266$ 2 Utah AIDS Foundation FY21-22 30,000.00$ REQUEST:45,000$ HOPWA Supportive Services FY20-21 30,000$ HTFAB:70,000$ FY19-20 30,000$ MAYOR:70,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: FY18-19 30,000$ COUNCIL:70,000$ FY17-18 30,000$ 5 YR TOTAL 150,000$ 3 Utah AIDS Foundation FY21-22 50,000$ REQUEST:50,000$ Mental Health Services FY20-21 -$ HTFAB:100,000$ FY19-20 -$ MAYOR:100,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: FY18-19 -$ COUNCIL:100,000$ FY17-18 -$ 5 YR TOTAL 50,000.00$ 4 Utah Community Action FY21-22 85,099$ REQUEST:165,000$ STRMU/PHP/Supportive Services FY20-21 162,044$ HTFAB:195,736$ FY19-20 127,099$ MAYOR:195,736$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: FY18-19 142,501$ COUNCIL:195,736$ FY17-18 104,388$ 5 YR TOTAL 5 Salt Lake City Corporation FY21-22 20,240$ REQUEST:25,205$ Program Administration FY20-21 18,026$ HTFAB:25,205$ FY19-20 16,003$ MAYOR:25,205$ FY18-19 14,166$ COUNCIL:25,205$ Administration: 3% of HOPWA allocation.FY17-18 12,505$ 5 YR TOTAL 80,940$ 3% of HOPWA Award:25,205.88$ 804,390$ 910,126$ 910,126$ 910,126$ Estimated 2022-2023 GRANT AWARD: $ 840,196 -$ REALLOCATION:69,930$ -$ TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE:910,126$ -$ If a decrease Maximize admin at 3%, then reduce funds from UCA down to $165,000 72-61999 48,026.78$ 72-62099 21,903.22$ Total:69,930.00$ Housing Programs: Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and end homelessness. Housing Programs: Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and end homelessness. 102.20 102.20 98.00 97.80 Behavioral Health: Support programs that provide connection to permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs. COUNCIL: MAYOR: MAYOR: COUNCIL: REQUEST: HOUSING TRUST FUND ADVISORY BRD: Combined Admin & HTFAB Score: Maximum Score: 114 Combined Admin & HTFAB Score: Maximum Score: 114 FUND AVAILABILITY:AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION: HOUSING TRUST FUND ADVISORY BOARD (HTFAB): TOTAL Combined Admin & HTFAB Score: Maximum Score: 114 Combined Admin & HTFAB Score: Maximum Score: 114 Provides Mental Health Services to persons with HIV/AIDS Organization also submitted a similar application for CDBG Public Services #23 SALT LAKE CITY HOPWA PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2022/2023 AWARDS Provides Supportive Services to persons with HIV/AIDS APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION REQUEST/ RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLANPREVIOUS GRANT To provide management, oversight, and monitoring of the HOPWA program. Provides Tenant Based Rental Assistance to persons with HIV/AIDS HTF Board Recommendation: The funds be awarded in the following manner as seen in the HTFAB Final Funding Recommendation Housing Programs: Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and end homelessness. Provides short term rental, mortgage, and/or utilities (STRMU)assistance, permanent housing placement (PHP), and supportive services to persons with HIV/AIDS Administration Staff Analysis: If an increase Maximize admin at 3%, then award additional funds to UCA up to $235,000, award any additional funds to Housing Connect For Finance Purposes Only: REALLOCATION FUNDING: Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 14 Goals Strategies Housing: Provide expanded housing options for all economic and demographic segments of Salt Lake City’s population while diversifying housing stock within neighborhoods 1. Support housing programs that address the needs of aging housing stock through targeted rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within the neighborhoods 2. Support affordable housing development that increases the number and types of units available for qualified residents 3. Support programs that provide access to home ownership 4. Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and/or end homelessness 5. Support programs that provide connection to permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs 6. Provide housing and essential supportive services to persons with HIV/AIDS Transportation: Promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal transportation options 1. Within eligible target areas, improve bus stop amenities as a way to encourage the accessibility of public transit and enhance the experience of public transit 2. Within eligible target areas, expand and support the installation of bike racks, stations, and amenities as a way to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation 3. Support access to transportation, prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations Community Resiliency: Provide tools to increase economic and/or housing stability 1. Support job training and vocational rehabilitation programs that increase economic mobility 2. Improve visual and physical appearance of deteriorating commercial buildings - limited to CDBG Target Area 3. Provide economic development support for microenterprise businesses 4. Direct financial assistance to for-profit businesses 5. Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement, social development, and change the cycle of poverty 6. Promote digital inclusion through access to digital communication technologies and the internet 7. Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population Homeless Services: Expand access to supportive programs that help ensure homelessness is rare, brief and non-reoccurring 1. Expand support for medical and dental care options for those experiencing homelessness 2. Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency Overflow Operations 3. Provide support for programs undertaking outreach services to address the needs of those living an unsheltered life 4. Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services Behavioral Health: Provide support for low income and vulnerable populations experiencing behavioral health concerns such as substance abuse disorders and mental health challenges 1. Expand treatment options, counseling support, and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan Goals and Strategies Note: language in BLUE is additional information added by Council staff Last Updated March 16, 2022 Attachment 2 - Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 15 Lisa Shaffer (Mar 8, 2022 15:20 MST)03/08/2022 03/08/2022 0 SALT LAKE CITY’S Citizens’ Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) 2022 Annual Report 2022 1 Purpose & Introduction The Citizens’ Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) was formed with the purpose of “…evaluating the total compensation levels of the city's elected officials, executives and employees and making recommendations to the human resources department, mayor and the city council…” (City Code Title 2, Chapter 2.35.050). Each year the committee is responsible for preparing and submitting a written report to the mayor and city council containing, among other things, recommendations on the “appropriate competitive position for the city relative to the compensation practices of comparable employers,” “wages and benefits of the city’s elected officials, executives and employees” and “general recommendations regarding the mix of compensation for the city’s employees, e.g., base salary, benefits, incentives” (City Code Title 2, Chapter 2.35.050.A.6) To provide city officials with the most valuable and relevant information, this year’s report is more streamlined to include a primary focus on the direct impact of current economic conditions on salary budgets and overview of the city’s latest local area market pay analysis. Finally, a grouping of informational appendices intended to provide city leaders with insight to key measures and indicators impacting the city’s workforce are also incorporated at the end of this year’s report. Respectfully, Citizens’ Compensation Advisory Committee Ray Schelble, Chair Mike Terry, Vice-chair Jana Bake Brandon Dew Jeff Herring Casey Lund Jeff Worthington 2 Section One: Impact of the current labor market and inflation on 2022 salary budgets Historically, this committee has relied upon data obtained from employer salary budget surveys conducted by WorldatWork when formulating recommendations to help city leaders determine the annual salary budget, including amounts for employee pay increases. Results of WorldatWork’s “2021-2022 Salary Budget Survey,” which were released in August 2021, reported 3.3% average and 3.0% median for 2022 planned salary budget increases. However, given the onset of hyperinflation not seen for decades and the extreme recruitment and retention challenges employers face nationwide, WorldatWork’s “Salary Budget Quick Poll” (conducted December 14, 2021 through January 3, 2022) confirmed organizations have re-evaluated the environment and are increasing their previously planned salary budgets to a 4% average and 5% median. Reports of similar indicators were cited by WorldatWork’s Brett Christie, as follows— • Pearl Meyer’s “2022 Projected Base Salary Increase Quick Poll” of 339 companies found that 2022 increases to base salaries will surpass 4% for all employee groups combined. Of the organizations with higher projected increases than was originally expected earlier in 2021, 40% reported increases greater than 5%. Approximately half of respondents anticipate 2022 base pay increases to be higher than what was originally expected earlier in the year, with 12% expecting increases to be significantly higher. 3 • Gallagher’s Labor Market Inflation Indicators for 2021-2022 report notes: “Wage and salary increase models which gradually taper salary growth throughout 2022 from its current 4.6% rate down to a 12-month 3.0% rate (equivalent to that experienced in Q1 of 2021) yield an overall average 12-month percent change rate of 3.7% for 2022. Given these models, we advise 2022 salary budgeting in the 3.5% to 4.0% range and structure increases a percentage point below the salary budget increase rate.” • Mercer’s research found that the percentage of employers providing increases of 3.5% or more doubled between its August and November pulse surveys from 13% to 27% RECOMMENDATION: Considering the impact of the current labor market conditions and inflation on employer salary budgets in 2022, the Committee recommends leaders increase the City’s overall salary budget, including employee base wage and salary adjustments, at a rate equal to at least 4% average or 5% median. Section Two: Local area market pay comparison The ability to effectively attract and retain key talent is based first and foremost on management, adaptability, and administration of the city’s pay structures and employee base wage and salary rates. To this end, the committee reviewed market pay data obtained primarily from multiple locally based private or public employers with operations along the Wasatch Front. This approach is due to the fact recruitment and applicant pool data reviewed by the committee overwhelmingly suggest the city draws its talent from the local area. Results of the market pay analysis conducted this year were presented by the city’s human resources staff using the compensation management tool offered by Payfactors to aggregate the latest sources of market pay information available. To facilitate this review, the city organized its job titles into 99 distinct benchmark groups. The committee reviewed job pricing information obtained for each of the 99 benchmark job titles highlighted in this report. In total, these benchmarks cover 1,247 employees which represents approximately 41% of the city’s regular, full-time workforce. Because market data is not available to price all jobs, it is important to note that if a job title is not shown as a 4 benchmark title it is instead tied to a benchmark for pricing purposes. For example, Accountant III is designated as the benchmark job for related titles in the same job family, including: - Accountant I - Accountant II - Accountant III (benchmark) - Accountant IV If market pay data indicates a particular benchmark job is significantly below market, then all levels of the job should be reviewed for potential pay adjustments—not just the benchmark job. This way the pay differences between levels of the same or similar jobs are appropriately maintained. The results of this year’s local market pay analysis are displayed in three separate work groups. This is done not only to account for the differences in each group’s unique wage structure and pay practices, but to also gauge the City’s success more effectively at positioning itself as a pay leader. These three work groups include: • AFSCME • Public Safety (including Firefighters, Police Officers and Public Safety Dispatchers) • Non-Represented Employees In addition to the regular local market pay analysis presented for consideration as part of this annual report, the Committee also received results of the special market study conducted by NFP in January 2022 of the City’s non-represented group of benchmark jobs. It is the Committee’s understanding that NFP’s full report, including their detailed benchmark analyses, conclusions and recommendations, will be transmitted to be considered separate and apart from this report. Among the recommendations cited in their report, however, NFP concluded the City would be better suited to maintain its competitive advantage by adjusting and setting pay scales within +/- 2% of the market base 50th percentile to be considered competitive amid the highly dynamic market conditions that exist today. The Committee also agreed that the previous standard of maintaining +/- 5% as a competitive pay position compared to market is no longer an effective or desirable approach. Instead, the Committee has now adopted the following new guidelines when determining an individual benchmark job’s compensation position relative to the market: - Significantly lagging when data indicates the benchmark job’s position relative to market is less than or equal to 90%. - Slightly lagging when data indicates the benchmark job’s position relative to market is between 90.1% and 98%. - Competitive when data indicates the benchmark job’s position relative to market is between 98.1% and 109.9%. - Significantly leading when data indicates the benchmark job’s position relative to market is greater than or equal to 110%. 5 GROUP FINDINGS & OVERALL SUMMARIES: Among the AFSCME workgroup, a total of 41 benchmark jobs, covering 338 employees, were evaluated (representing 41% of the total jobs surveyed). Market median (50th percentile) pay rates were compared to the Salt Lake City’s wage schedule top rate. The following list includes all related benchmark jobs sorted by those which are most significantly lagging to most significantly leading. AFSCME Summary BM Job Count Overall Average Market Position Significantly Lagging (Less than or equal to 90% of market)2 82% Slightly Lagging (Between 90.1% and 98% of market)10 92% Competitive (Between 98.1% and 109.9% of market)16 101% Significantly Leading (Greater than or equal to 110% of market)13 109% Overall Market Comparison 41 99.18% 6 2021 - Job Title (Job Code)SLC Top Rate (union only) # SLC Incumbents Market Salary (50th Percentile) Market Comparison (SLC Top Rate vs Market Median AIRFIELD MAINT ELECTRICIAN (002618)*$80,080 15 $97,700 82% LABORATORY CHEMIST UNION (001806)$66,498 2 $75,300 88% BUILDING EQUIP. OP. II (006071)$52,458 0 $57,900 91% ENVIRON SPECIALIST II UNION (000720)$73,320 1 $80,800 91% AIR OPER SPECIALIST AIR UNION (002440)*$66,498 3 $71,900 92% WRF OP II (002134)$57,325 9 $61,800 93% WATER METER TECHNICIAN II (000997)$50,835 2 $54,500 93% PLANS EXAMINER I (002127)$69,846 3 $74,000 94% FLEET MECHANIC (001952)$57,325 40 $60,400 95% CRIME SCENE TECH II UNION (001779)$52,354 9 $55,100 95% WATER METER READER II (006326)$42,578 0 $43,700 97% MAINT. ELECTRICIAN IV (000168)$62,754 8 $64,200 98% PLUMBER II (000854)$59,051 1 $59,900 99% POLICE INTELLIGENCE SPEC.UNION (001539)$57,450 3 $57,700 100% EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN II (002277)$50,232 5 $49,900 101% HVAC TEC. II (006050)$60,798 9 $60,300 101% ASPHALT EQUIP OPERATOR II (000909)$52,458 32 $52,000 101% BUSINESS LICENSING PROCESS II (001964)$55,869 4 $54,400 103% WASTE & RECYCLING EQUIP OP II (002347)$52,458 26 $50,800 103% CARPENTER II (001349)$55,578 7 $52,700 105% ENGINEERING TECH IV UNION (000829)$63,315 10 $59,600 106% SR UTILITIES REP CUST SVC (000199)$50,690 6 $47,600 106% METAL FABRICATION TECHNICIAN (001925)$62,754 5 $58,800 107% GENERAL MAINTENANCE WORKER II (002489)$52,458 1 $48,900 107% JUDICIAL ASSISTANT II (002084)$55,869 8 $51,800 108% FORENSIC SCIENTIST I (001973)$63,315 2 $58,700 108% PAINTER II (001347)$55,578 6 $51,100 109% WATER PLANT OPERATOR II (000966)$60,798 24 $55,600 109% CUSTODIAN II (006090)$36,670 2 $33,400 110% POLICE INFORMATION SPECIALIST (002463)$50,690 12 $45,800 111% ACCESS CONTROL SPECIALIST (002340)*$52,520 7 $47,200 111% ARBORIST II (001375)$53,976 4 $48,100 112% BUILDING INSPECTOR III (001967)$76,981 10 $67,600 114% PARKS GROUNDSKEEPER (001813)$39,042 9 $33,800 116% SENIOR SECRETARY (003030)$50,690 1 $43,800 116% WAREHSE SUP WORKER-AIRPORT (002022)$48,963 1 $42,200 116% WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE OP II (000975)$53,976 16 $45,100 120% CONCRETE FINISHER (001852)$57,325 9 $46,700 123% CIVIL ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I (001893)$57,782 4 $46,900 123% OFFICE TECHNICIAN II (001191)$50,690 18 $39,200 129% CITY PAYMENTS PROCESSOR (000263)$52,520 4 $31,500 167% * = Market salary normalized to Salt Lake City AFSCME Breakout 7 Among the Public Safety workgroup, a total of 10 benchmark jobs, covering 722 employees, were evaluated (representing 10% of the total jobs surveyed). Market top pay rates of pay were compared to the Salt Lake City’s wage schedule top rate. The following list includes all related benchmark jobs sorted by those which are most significantly lagging to most significantly leading. Public Safety Summary BM Job Count Overall Average Market Position Significantly Lagging (Less than or equal to 90% of market)3 88% Slightly Lagging (Between 90.1% and 98% of market)2 93% Competitive (Between 98.1% and 109.9% of market)4 101% Significantly Leading (Greater than or equal to 110% of market)1 111% Overall Market Comparison 10 96% 2021 - Job Title (Job Code)SLC Top Rate # SLC Incumbents Market Salary (Top Rate) Market Comparison (SLC Top Rate vs Market Top Rate) FIREFIGHTER/ENGINEER - all levels $77,438 53 $90,275 86% POLICE LIEUTENANT (000849)$112,653 25 $129,316 87% POLICE OFFICER - All levels $81,723 275 $90,766 90% POLICE SERGEANT (007008)$95,680 68 $103,898 92% FIRE CAPTAIN (008040)$94,765 79 $100,838 94% POLICE CAPTAIN (000851)$127,587 8 $127,982 100% BATTALION CHIEF (008030)$116,896 13 $116,646 100% FIREFIGHTER/EMT - all levels $72,405 58 $71,459 101% FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC - all levels $83,616 80 $80,687 104% PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHER (002387)$67,642 63 $61,102 111% Public Safety Breakout 8 Among the non-represented employee workgroup, a total of 48 benchmark jobs, covering 187 employees, were evaluated (representing 48% of the total jobs surveyed). Market median (50th percentile) pay rates were compared to the non-represented employee actual median wages/salaries. As with the other groups, the following list ranks all related benchmark jobs sorted by those which are most significantly lagging to most significantly leading. Non-Represented Summary BM Job Count Overall Average Market Position Significantly Lagging (Less than or equal to 90% of market)15 86% Slightly Lagging (Between 90.1% and 98% of market)13 95% Competitive (Between 98.1% and 109.9% of market)15 103% Significantly Leading (Greater than or equal to 110% of market)5 116% Overall Market Comparison 48 96% 9 2021 - Job Title (Job Code) SLC Median Employee Salary # SLC Incumbents Market Salary (50th Percentile) Market Comparison (SLC Median vs Market Median) SYSTEMS ENGINEER III (002571)$97,760 1 $131,600 74% CYBERSECURITY ENGINEER II (002573)$98,488 2 $127,100 77% NETWORK ENGINEER II (002576)$91,666 1 $107,900 85% FINANCIAL ANALYST III (001670)$74,797 6 $86,000 87% LICENSED ARCHITECT (000752)$83,200 1 $95,600 87% GIS SPECIALIST (002154)$57,595 1 $65,500 88% AUDITOR III (001684)$71,261 1 $80,700 88% FORENSIC SCIENTIST II (001974)$66,227 4 $74,800 89% MANAGEMENT ANALYST (001092)$65,062 3 $72,900 89% REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROP MGR (002509)$79,165 1 $88,600 89% SR BENEFITS ANALYST (002122)^$75,337 0 $84,300 89% EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT (001989)$65,062 12 $72,800 89% HR LEAVE SPECIALIST (002451)$78,957 1 $88,200 90% SAFETY PROGRAM MGR (002286)$91,666 2 $102,100 90% OFFICE FACILITATOR II NON UNIO (001232)$51,334 30 $57,000 90% SOCIAL SERVICE WORKER (001921)^$51,362 0 $56,300 91% PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR (001890)$71,739 1 $78,100 92% BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST II (002338)$87,277 6 $93,900 93% GOLF PROFESSIONAL II (002503)$76,523 2 $81,500 94% HR BUSINESS PARTNER II (002591)$85,197 6 $90,000 95% SENIOR CITY ATTORNEY (002319)$144,456 12 $152,500 95% SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCE TECHNICIAN (001866)$49,358 4 $51,700 95% PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST I (000533)$61,558 2 $63,900 96% CLAIMS ADJUSTER (001995)^$65,056 0 $67,200 97% SOFTWARE ENGINEER III (002145)$97,448 2 $100,500 97% HRIS ANALYST (002155)$89,471 2 $91,900 97% PARALEGAL (002201)$60,746 6 $62,300 98% ENGINEER IV (002198)$87,069 13 $89,000 98% REAL PROPERTY AGENT (000370)$68,016 2 $69,000 99% COLLECTIONS OFFICER (001376)$45,978 4 $46,500 99% NETWORK SYSTEMS ENGINEER II (001394)^$91,661 0 $92,700 99% ACCOUNTANT III (001666)$75,338 13 $75,700 100% PRINCIPAL PLANNER (001733)$69,867 9 $69,500 101% HR RECRUITER (002297)$65,000 1 $64,500 101% GOLF SUPERINTENDENT 18 HOLES (000936)$71,573 3 $70,800 101% EMPLOYEE MARKETING & COMM (002225)^$68,295 0 $65,500 104% SOFTWARE SUPPORT ADMIN II (001729)$82,909 8 $79,300 105% LEGAL SECRETARY III (003136)$57,200 3 $54,700 105% TECH SYSTEM ANALYST III (002203)^$75,337 0 $71,400 106% CITY PAYROLL ADMINISTRATOR (001945)$63,492 2 $59,900 106% CIVIC ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM SPEC. (001821)$60,798 2 $57,200 106% EMPLOYEE TRAINING & DEVELOPMEN (000491)^$65,056 0 $60,600 107% VICTIM ADVOCATE (001765)$47,310 4 $43,900 108% VIDEO PRODUCTION MGR (002217)^$91,661 0 $82,800 111% GRAPHIC DESING SPECIALIST II (002607)^$68,295 0 $60,700 113% JUSTICE COURT JUDGE (001601)$160,306 5 $140,200 114% PROG COOR ARTS COUNCIL (001799)$65,884 2 $55,900 118% NET SUP ADM II (001396)$61,942 7 $47,800 130% ^ = Comparing against pay grade midpoint in lieu of median wage as job is currently vacant. Non-Represented Breakout 10 RECOMMENDATION: The Committee wishes to express its support for the City’s compensation strategy to position Salt Lake City as an area pay leader for employees. The Committee has long recognized that Salt Lake City employees deal with a volume of diverse situations and problems not seen by most other municipal entities in the state. Therefore, it is in the City’s best interest to attract the most capable employees to all positions and to encourage them to stay. The Committee believes that compensation should be an important factor in this equation and that this policy will prove beneficial to the City’s citizens in the future. Furthermore, as funds permit, the committee recommends the mayor and city council appropriate financial resources necessary to grant market salary adjustments for employees in benchmark jobs identified in this report as lagging market. 1. First priority should be given to those lagging significantly; and, 2. Second priority should be given to those lagging slightly behind market. 11 Appendix A - Salt Lake City 2021 Overall Recruitment Statistics (as reported 1/24/22) o Total # of job postings = 510 (compared to 348 in 2020) o Total # of applicants = 17,051 (compared to 13,818 in 2020) o Total # regular, full-time employees hired (excluding seasonal and part-time workers) = 412 (compared to 379 in 2020) 2021 Turnover rates by department Voluntary turnover includes resignations, retirements, and job abandonments. Involuntary turnover includes probationary releases, dismissals, separations, and deaths. 2020 Department # of Employees # total Terminations Overall Turnover Rate Retention Voluntary Turnover Involuntary Turnover 911 BUREAU 84 20 24%76%23%1% AIRPORT 520 45 9%91%8%1% ATTORNEY 64 23 38%60%36%2% CITY COUNCIL 30 7 23%77%23%0% COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 176 20 12%88%10%1% ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 16 3 19%80%19%0% FINANCE 69 7 10%90%9%1% FIRE 356 23 7%93%6%1% HUMAN RESOURCES 30 8 29%68%29%0% INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES 77 9 12%88%12%0% JUSTICE COURTS 40 2 5%95%3%3% MAYOR 25 5 21%77%17%4% POLICE 628 70 11%89%11%0% PUBLIC SERVICES 277 39 14%86%14%0% PUBLIC LANDS 139 6 5%95%5%0% PUBLIC UTILITIES 393 47 12%88%11%1% REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 26 1 4%96%4%0% SUSTAINABILITY 62 8 13%86%12%2% Department # of Employees # total Terminations Overall Turnover Rate Retention Voluntary Turnover Involuntary Turnover 911 BUREAU 85 25 31%67%29%2% AIRPORT 491 32 7%93%6%1% ATTORNEY 56 12 23%76%19%4% CITY COUNCIL 23 0 0%100%0%0% COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 192 13 7%93%7%1% ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 14 2 15%83%8%8% FINANCE 68 3 4%95%4%0% FIRE 344 21 6%94%5%1% HUMAN RESOURCES 25 6 28%67%28%0% INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES 62 7 11%89%11%0% JUSTICE COURTS 38 2 5%95%3%3% MAYOR 22 8 43%47%43%0% POLICE 632 78 13%87%12%1% PUBLIC SERVICES 384 24 6%93%5%1% PUBLIC UTILITIES 404 36 9%90%7%2% REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 23 1 4%96%4%0% SUSTAINABILITY 61 5 9%91%9%0% APPOINTMENT 4 NEW HIRE 357 REHIRE 51 Grand Total 412 12 APPENDIX B - Salt Lake City 2021 Union Job Recruitment Statistics Unless otherwise noted, the following statistics account for the total number of external applicants and hires made between January 1, 2021 – December 31, 2021. AFSCME - Trade & Craft (100 Series) – Of 2,161 external applicants, 1,954 (or 90%) were from Utah. Out of 124 hires, 122 (or, 98%) were from Utah.19 were rehires. - Clerical & Administrative Support (200 Series) – Of 1,112 external applicants, 998 (or, 90%) were from Utah. Out of 44 hires, 43 (98%) were from Utah. Four were rehires. - Paraprofessional (330 Series) – Of 848 external applicants, 676 (or, 80%) were from Utah. Out of 63 hires, 100% were from Utah. Six were rehires. In total approximately 86% of all external applicants and 99% of new hires for all AFSCME bargaining units were from the state of Utah. Police Officers - Of 1,468 external applicants, 1,085 (or, 74%) were from Utah. Of 65 hires made in 2020, 59 (or, 91%) were from Utah. 14 police officers were rehired. Firefighters* - Of 766 external applicants, 446 were from Utah (58%). Out of 27 hires, 25 (or, 93% were from Utah. One firefighter was rehired. *Note – Fire department hiring rosters typically have a hiring delay of up to two years. Applicants from 2021 may still be in the pipeline for 2022 or later. Report date 1/24/2022 13 APPENDIX C - SLCPD SWORN PUBLIC SAFETY TURNOVER DATA POLICE 2021 Total SLCPD Sworn Employees Voluntary Involuntary 511 64 5 TOTAL SWORN TURNOVER % 12.52% 0.98% Voluntary Turnover includes: 46 Resignations • 44 Police Officers • 2 Police Sergeants 18 Retirements • 1 Deputy Chief • 1 Police Captain • 2 Police Lieutenants • 3 Police Sergeants • 11 Police Officers Involuntary Turnover includes: 1 Death • 1 Police Sergeant 4 Probationary Releases • 4 Police Officers 51 Total New Hires in 2021: • 5 Lateral (experienced LEO) Officer New Hires o Former agency listed below: • 1 came from Tooele County Sheriff’s • 1 came from Tooele City Police Dept. • 1 came from Layton City Police Dept. • 1 came from Santa Clara County Sheriff’s in California • 1 came from Utah Highway Patrol o Number of years in law enforcement when hired by SLCPD • 2 laterals had less than 2 years of experience • 1 lateral had between 2 to 5 years of experience • 2 laterals more than 5 years of experience • 46 Entry Level Police Officer New Hires o 1 new hire moved from Idaho o 1 new hire moved from California o 1 new hire moved from Tennessee o 1 new hire moved from Oregon o 1 new hire moved from New Jersey 14 14 Rehires in 2021: • 13 Police Officers came back after being gone for less than 1 year • 1 Police Officer came back after being gone for more than 1 year FIRE 2021 Total SLCFD Sworn Employees Voluntary Involuntary 338 19 2 TOTAL SWORN TURNOVER % 5.62% 0.59% Voluntary Turnover includes: 5 Resignations • 3 Firefighters • 1 Fire Captain • 1 Firefighter Heavy Rescue Technician II 14 Retirements • 3 Airport Rescue Firefighter III’s • 1 Battalion Chief • 6 Fire Captains • 2 Firefighter Engineer III’s • 1 Firefighter/Paramedic II • 1 Firefighter III Involuntary Turnover includes: 1 Death • 1 Airport Rescue Firefighter III 1 Probationary Release • 1 Firefighter 27 New Hire Firefighters in 2021 Prepared for and on behalf of the Committee by: 349 South 200 East, Suite 500 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5464 (801) 535-7900 Deb Alexander, Chief Human Resources Officer David Salazar, Compensation Program Manager Michael Jenson, Compensation Analyst Salt Lake City Non-Represented Compensation Benchmarking Report SLC Council Presentation Rachel Burt, PHR, SHRM-SCP HR Consultant Michael Ongkiko, SPHR, SHRM-SCP Managing Director March 22, 2022 SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS PUBLIC SECTOR OVERVIEW 2 NFP specializes in the Public Sector providing over 25 years of expertise and resources. Please see a list below of some of the highlights: RECOGNIZED EXPERTS IN THE SPACE Work with experts on our team, who have been invited to speak for, and participate in many industry organizations, including: •Utah Association of Counties (UAC) •Society for Human Resource Management •SelectHealth & PEHP Broker Advisory Boards •Utah League of Cities & Towns (ULCT) •The Governor’s Office •The National Association of Counties •The National League of Cities TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Current Assessment &Goals 4 Compensation Benchmarking Results 10 Solution & Compensation and Classification System Administration Recommendations 17 Future of the Job Landscape 24 Questions 27 SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Goals & Scope of the Compensation Project 4 Salt Lake City engaged NFP Human Resource Solutions to conduct a compensation benchmarking study of public agencies and private industries in order to: •Utilize market pay data from various sources and to provide an external assessment summary to the City regarding current market competitiveness. •Develop strategic positioning recommendations using market data and best practices. •Support Salt Lake City and understand what changes are required in terms of compensation in order to retain and attract top talent. •Project did not include all of the city’s 578 active job titles for non-represented employees. Included only a subset of that group of 64 benchmark jobs. SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Assessment of Current SLC Conditions 5 •Salt Lake City’s pay plan has a separate pay range (minimum, midpoint (City Market), maximum) for each job. •There are thirty-two (32) grades from grade 10 to grade 41. Pay ranges from a minimum to maximum average 69.11% (grades 39, 40, 41 were not calculated in average ). Salary Placement of Employees’ Salaries Relative to Pay Grade Minimums and Maximums: •0 employees with salaries below the minimum or at the minimum of the grade. •0 employees with salaries at the maximum and 0 employees with salaries above the maximum. GRADE MINIMUM CITY MARKET MAXIMUM 10 $25,083 $32,756 $40,429 11 $26,301 $34,408 $42,494 12 $27,626 $36,430 $45,189 13 $29,018 $37,951 $46,863 14 $30,452 $39,690 $48,928 15 $31,974 $42,016 $52,014 16 $33,560 $44,472 $55,340 17 $35,256 $46,254 $57,253 18 $37,016 $49,167 $61,296 19 $38,864 $51,362 $63,817 20 $40,820 $53,536 $66,230 21 $41,190 $56,166 $71,164 22 $43,276 $59,035 $74,772 23 $45,450 $61,991 $78,554 24 $47,711 $65,056 $82,423 25 $50,080 $68,295 $86,531 GRADE MINIMUM CITY MARKET MAXIMUM 26 $52,601 $71,751 $90,878 27 $55,209 $75,337 $95,486 28 $57,948 $79,163 $100,355 29 $60,883 $83,118 $105,354 30 $63,926 $87,270 $110,636 31 $67,121 $91,661 $116,179 32 $70,468 $96,225 $121,961 33 $74,011 $101,051 $128,090 34 $77,706 $106,093 $134,502 35 $81,575 $111,397 $141,219 36 $85,662 $116,961 $148,283 37 $89,944 $122,808 $155,673 38 $94,443 $128,960 $163,455 39 $99,181 $208,296 40 $104,115 $218,664 41 $109,332 $354,732 SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Assessment of Current SLC Conditions Compensation Philosophy: Pay at market or midpoint for each job and strategically set market pay at the highest wage found via wage surveys and benchmarking tools. Job Title Grade Job Title Grade 1 ACCOUNTANT III 027X 33 LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST 027X 2 ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II 021X 34 LEGAL SECRETARY III 018X 3 AUDITOR III 028X 35 LICENSED CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER 026X 4 BILLING OFFICE SUPERVISOR 025X 36 MANAGEMENT ANALYST 024X 5 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 030X 37 NETWORK SUPPORT ADMINISTRATOR II 025X 6 CITY CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR 029X 38 NETWORK ENGINEER II 031X 7 CITY PAYROLL ADMINISTRATOR 026X 39 NETWORK SYSTEMS ENGINEER III 033X 8 COMPENSATION ANALYST 029X 40 OFFICE FACILITATOR II (OFFICE MANAGER)019X 9 COLLECTIONS MANAGER 030X 41 PARALEGAL 023X 10 COLLECTIONS OFFICER 020X 42 PAYROLL AND ACCOUNTING MANAGER 031X 11 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR 023X 43 PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST I 024X 12 CUSTOMER SERVICE MGR 029X 44 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 026X 13 CYBERSECURITY ENGINEER II 033X 45 REAL PROPERTY MANAGER 031X 14 ENGINEER IV 031X 46 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MNGR 033X 15 FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 025X 47 RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST 024X 16 FINANCIAL ANALYST III 029X 48 RISK MANAGER 034X 17 FINANCIAL MGR III 035X 49 SAFETY COORDINATOR 026X 18 FLEET MANAGEMENT SERVICE 025X 50 SAFETY PROGRAM MGR 031X 19 FORENSIC SCIENTIST II 026X 51 SENIOR ARCHITECT (LICENSED)033X 20 GEO INFO SYSTEMS (GIS) MGR 033X 52 SENIOR CLAIMS ADJUSTER 028X 21 GIS PROGRAMMER ANALYST II 030X 53 SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES TECH 019X 22 GRAPHIC DESIGN SPECIALIST II 025X 54 SENIOR LABORATORY CHEMIST 026X 23 HOUSING & REHAB LOAN OFFICER 024X 55 SOCIAL SERVICE WORKER (CSW)021X 24 HOUSING LOAN ADMIN 021X 56 SOCIAL WORK DIRECTOR 031X 25 HR BUSINESS PARTNER II 030X 57 SOCIAL WORK MANAGER 029X 26 HR RECRUITER 025X 58 SOFTWARE ENGINEER DATABASE 036X 27 HRIS ANALYST 030X 59 SOFTWARE ENGINEER III 033X 28 HUMAN RESOURCES SUPERVISOR 030X 60 SOFTWARE SUPPORT ADMIN III 032X 29 INFO TECH PROJECT MANAGER 035X 61 SR PURCHASING CONSULTANT 027X 30 LABORATORY PROGRAM MANAGER 029X 62 SR SOFTWARE ENGINEER 035X 31 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT III 029X 63 SYSTEMS ENGINEER III 033X 32 LAW OFFICE MANAGER 021X 64 WAREHOUSE SUPERVISOR 024X 6 SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS 7 Current Landscape: Inflation EconomySource:BLS,FactSet,J.P.Morgan Asset Management. CPI used is CPI-U and values shown are %change vs.one year ago.Core CPI is defined as CPI excluding food and energy prices.The Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE)deflator employs an evolving chain-weighted basket of consumer expenditures instead of the fixed-weight basket used in CPI calculations. Guide to the Markets –U.S.Data are as of December 31,2021. CPI and core CPI % change vs. prior year, seasonally adjusted -3% 0% 3% 6% 9% 12% 15% '71 '73 '75 '77 '79 '81 '83 '85 '87 '89 '91 '93 '95 '97 '99 '01 '03 '05 '07 '09 '11 '13 '15 '17 '19 '21 Recession SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Accelerated Wage Inflation 8 •Job openings were flat and voluntary quits dipped in December 2021; some of which could be omicron-related. However, if it’s the beginning of a stabilizing trend, that could start to put a little downward pressure on wage growth— especially if inflation starts to ease. SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Accelerated Wage Inflation 9 A spot survey (12.2021) of 551 senior U.S. HR leaders by professional services firm Grant Thornton found: •Base pay. 51% said their organization expected average merit increases of more than 5%. •Variable pay. 68% of HR leaders said their company had increased the number of employees eligible to receive a cash bonus. Inflation has erased of the average wage gains for frontline workers SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS 10 SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Benchmarking Methodology 11 Multiple cuts of data were employed within each source which included: •Private industry •Public entities, government, public administration, non-profit •Revenue size •Budget •Numbers of full-time FTEs •Each cut of data found above was sourced for the Salt Lake City area, the State of Utah and the Wasatch front. Survey data if applicable, was aged accordingly to reflect current data for early 2022 Four (4) main sources of compensation benchmarking data were utilized in Salt Lake City’s compensation benchmarking project. These sources include: •CompAnalyst •ERI •Payscale •Compdata SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Benchmarking Methodology 12 Compensation terminology utilized in this presentation and reporting: •Benchmarked Job -job that has a standard and consistent set of responsibilities from one organization to another and for which data is available in valid and reliable salary surveys. •Base 25th Percentile -marks where 25% of the reported values are lower than the figure given and 75% are higher. •Base 50th percentile -The lower half of salaries for this a job that falls below the fiftieth percentile while the upper half are above it. The 50th percentile is the most widely-used measure of the “middle” of the possible pay values for a job. •Base 75th percentile -marks where 75% of the reported values are lower than the figure given and 25% are higher. •TCC –Total Cash Compensation, which can include but not limited to base salary, commissions, cash bonuses, amounts vested. Average 25th Base and 25th TCC (Total Cash Compensation) Average 50th Base TCC (Total Cash Compensation) Average 75th Base and 75th TCC (Total Cash Compensation) NFP compared the published survey data’s Average 50th Percentile to SLC’s median salaries and the City’s market or midpoint in the analysis. Other data complied included: SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Sample Data Sheet 13 SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Compensation Benchmarking Summary Results 14 Salt Lake City’s jobs related to the published survey results and the 50th Percentile found: •18 jobs or 28.1% of the jobs are more than 2% above market midpoint. •12 jobs or 18.8% of the jobs are within +/-2% of the 50% Percentile. •34 jobs or 53.1% of the jobs are more than 2% below the 50th Percentile. Reviewing all the sixty-four (64) job’s median salaries in each grade and comparing to the benchmarked 50th Percentile, the City is: •-3.09% below the market midpoint (average for all jobs). •This dollar amount averages -$3,366 below the market across all jobs or a median dollar amount of -$1,991. Reviewing Salt Lake City’s market midpoints in each grade and comparing to the benchmarked 50th Percentile, the City is: •-0.83% below the market midpoint •This dollar amount averages -$1,491 below the benchmarked midpoint of market or a median dollar amount of $-926. SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Compensation Benchmarking Summary Results-Above & At Market Jobs 15 Based on the published compensation survey market data gathered at the 50th Percentile, the following can be determined: Above Market Of the 64 City jobs for which market midpoint data was collected:•18 jobs or 28.1% of the jobs are “Above the Market” benchmarked 50th Percentile.•Of the jobs above market, five (5) jobs were greater than 10% above market and are listed below: Job Title % Difference Between SLC Average Pay & Benchmarked Midpoint (50th Base) COLLECTIONS MANAGER 22.86% COLLECTIONS OFFICER 19.20% GIS PROGRAMMER ANALYST II 18.34% SOCIAL WORK MANAGER 17.24% PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 16.13% At Market Of the 64 City jobs for which the 50th Percentile data was collected: •12 jobs or 18.8% of the jobs are “At Market” compared to the benchmarked 50th Percentile. SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Compensation Benchmarking Summary Results-Below Market Jobs 16 Job Title % Difference Between SLC Average Pay & Benchmarked Midpoint (50th Base) FLEET MANAGEMENT SERVICE SUPERVISOR -27.27% LABORATORY PROGRAM MANAGER -18.19% FINANCIAL ANALYST III -17.72% SENIOR LABORATORY CHEMIST -17.16% AUDITOR III -14.59% RISK MANAGER -14.36% ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II -14.36% SR PURCHASING CONSULTANT -14.19% SOCIAL WORK DIRECTOR -12.69% REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MNGR -12.53% CYBERSECURITY ENGINEER II -12.36% PAYROLL AND ACCOUNTING MANAGER -12.19% FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR -12.14% MANAGEMENT ANALYST -12.09% SENIOR ARCHITECT (LICENSED)-10.37% NETWORK SUPPORT ADMINISTRATOR II -10.13% Based on the published compensation survey market data gathered at the market midpoint of the salary range, the following can be determined: Of the 64 City jobs for which market midpoint data was collected: 34 jobs or 53.1% of the jobs are below the benchmarked 50th Percentile. Of the jobs below market, sixteen (16) jobs were greater than 10% below market. Solution & Compensation and Classification System Administration Recommendations SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Benchmarking Survey Data Effect on Slotting of Positions in Current Grade Structure 18 Financial Analyst III Current Grade:29 Median Pay:$74,797 (Six (6) incumbents) Published Survey Midpoint (50th Base):$93,112 New Proposed Grade After Analysis:31 Current Grade Current City Minimum Current City Midpoint/Market Current City Maximum 29 $60,883 $83,118 $105,354 30 $63,926 $87,270 $110,636 31 $67,121 $91,661 $116,179 32 $70,468 $96,225 $121,961 New Proposed City Midpoint/Grade 31:$94,407 SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Compensation Recommendation #1-Adjust the City’s Market Midpoint 19 Adjust Salt Lake City’s Market (Midpoint) Utilizing benchmarked 50% Percentile as a Guide. •Chart reflects the new pay grades, market rates or midpoints. •A premium of 2% was added to each new market midpoint to reflect the compensation philosophy of the City. •Positions were slotted after careful review of the job descriptions and internal scope and worth of each position relative to the grade. •*Employee performance, tenure/seniority, promotions, demotions, employees in grades not benchmarked, pay equity concerns and if an employee was rehired, was not factored into the job slotting and new midpoint evaluation. •Midpoint differentials between grades averaged 5.16%. SLC Grade New Grade Job Title # of incumbents SLC Average pay SLC Median Pay Benchmarking Comparison- Midpoint (50th Base) New Midpoint Estimated Cost to Market Midpoint of Published Survey Data 020X COLLECTIONS OFFICER 4 $48,173 $45,978 $40,413 019X 20 OFFICE FACILITATOR II (OFFICE MANAGER)30 $51,451 $51,334 $52,058 $65,015 019X 20 SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES TECH 4 $49,457 $49,358 $52,847 $53,502 $16,573 021X 21 HOUSING LOAN ADMIN 1 $54,475 $54,475 $56,112 $57,491 $3,016 021X 21 SOCIAL SERVICE WORKER (CSW)5 $58,082 $58,698 $56,615 N/A 024X 22 HOUSING & REHAB LOAN OFFICER 1 $61,818 $61,818 $59,523 $61,112 N/A 018X 22 LEGAL SECRETARY III 3 $54,579 $57,200 $60,304 $11,735 023X 23 PARALEGAL 6 $60,871 $60,746 $61,400 $19,206 024X 23 WAREHOUSE SUPERVISOR 3 $63,412 $65,062 $61,484 N/A 026X 23 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 1 $71,739 $71,739 $61,777 N/A 026X 23 CITY PAYROLL ADMINISTRATOR 2 $63,492 $63,492 $63,530 $63,947 $911 023X 23 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR 1 $62,608 $62,608 $63,599 $1,339 024X 23 PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST I 2 $61,558 $61,558 $64,371 $4,780 025X 24 HR RECRUITER 1 $65,000 $65,000 $65,284 $1,979 021X 24 ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II 1 $56,160 $56,160 $65,574 $10,819 026X 24 FORENSIC SCIENTIST II 4 $66,300 $66,227 $65,833 $66,979 $3,007 025X 24 GRAPHIC DESIGN SPECIALIST II 0 $68,286 $68,286 $65,972 N/A SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Compensation Recommendation #1-Adjust the City’s Market Midpoint 20 SLC Grade New Grade Job Title # of incumbents SLC Average pay SLC Median Pay Benchmarking Comparison- Midpoint (50th Base) New Midpoint Estimated Cost to Market Midpoint of Published Survey Data 030X 25 COLLECTIONS MANAGER 1 $82,930 $82,930 $67,499 N/A 021X 25 LAW OFFICE MANAGER 1 $63,690 $63,690 $68,177 $69,637 $5,948 025X 25 NETWORK SUPPORT ADMINISTRATOR II 7 $62,139 $61,942 $69,140 $69,637 $53,865 025X 26 BILLING OFFICE SUPERVISOR 1 $68,994 $68,994 $70,528 $3,899 030X 26 GIS PROGRAMMER ANALYST II 4 $83,720 $83,990 $70,746 N/A 029X 26 SOCIAL WORK MANAGER 2 $84,198 $84,198 $71,820 $72,892 N/A 026X 26 LICENSED CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER (LCSW)1 $68,182 $68,182 $72,758 $4,710 024X 27 RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST 1 $76,294 $76,294 $73,100 N/A 024X 27 MANAGEMENT ANALYST 3 $64,716 $65,062 $73,616 $31,467 027X 27 LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST 1 $70,637 $70,637 $74,162 $4,915 029X 27 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT III 1 $78,957 $78,957 $74,730 $75,551 N/A 026X 27 SAFETY COORDINATOR 3 $72,793 $72,446 $74,742 $9,315 029X 28 CITY CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR 1 $78,957 $78,957 $76,422 $526 028X 28 SENIOR CLAIMS ADJUSTER 1 $77,189 $77,189 $77,760 $2,294 025X 28 FLEET MANAGEMENT SERVICE SUPERVISOR 6 $66,955 $67,621 $77,867 $71,170 027X 28 ACCOUNTANT III 13 $74,800 $75,338 $78,324 $79,482 $53,883 029X 28 COMPENSATION ANALYST 1 $83,117 $83,117 $79,247 N/A 029X 29 CUSTOMER SERVICE MGR 0 $83,117 $83,117 $81,972 N/A 030X 29 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 6 $85,058 $87,277 $81,991 N/A 030X 29 HUMAN RESOURCES SUPERVISOR 3 $82,146 $82,909 $82,683 $84,169 $3,782 028X 29 AUDITOR III 1 $71,261 $71,261 $83,430 $12,909 SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS SLC Grade New Grade Job Title # of incumbents SLC Average pay SLC Median Pay Benchmarking Comparison- Midpoint (50th Base) New Midpoint Estimated Cost to Market Midpoint of Published Survey Data 027X 30 SR PURCHASING CONSULTANT 1 $73,840 $73,840 $86,051 $15,901 030X 30 HR BUSINESS PARTNER II 6 $85,249 $85,197 $87,424 $27,267 031X 30 ENGINEER IV 13 $87,213 $87,069 $87,930 $34,743 026X 30 SENIOR LABORATORY CHEMIST 1 $73,320 $73,320 $88,507 $16,421 031X 30 REAL PROPERTY MANAGER 1 $91,666 $91,666 $88,668 $89,741 N/A 030X 30 HRIS ANALYST 2 $89,471 $89,471 $89,310 $540 032X 31 SOFTWARE SUPPORT ADMIN III 4 $96,294 $92,477 $90,857 $7,720 029X 31 FINANCIAL ANALYST III 6 $76,610 $74,797 $93,112 $94,407 $117,660 031X 31 NETWORK ENGINEER II 1 $91,666 $91,666 $93,698 $2,741 033X 32 GEO INFO SYSTEMS (GIS) MGR 3 $90,771 $92,685 $96,658 $18,718 025X 32 FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 5 $68,411 $68,286 $97,311 $98,924 $153,189 031X 33 PAYROLL AND ACCOUNTING MANAGER 1 $87,360 $87,360 $99,488 $16,048 031X 33 SAFETY PROGRAM MGR 2 $91,666 $91,666 $100,962 $23,485 035X 33 INFO TECH PROJECT MANAGER 2 $100,589 $100,589 $101,602 $103,408 $5,638 033X 33 SYSTEMS ENGINEER III 1 $97,760 $97,760 $102,235 $5,648 029X 33 LABORATORY PROGRAM MANAGER 1 $83,949 $83,949 $102,615 $103,408 $19,459 033X 24 SOFTWARE ENGINEER III 2 $97,448 $97,448 $104,073 $19,450 031X 34 SOCIAL WORK DIRECTOR 1 $91,666 $91,666 $104,985 $107,173 $15,508 036X 34 SOFTWARE ENGINEER DATABASE 2 $109,023 $109,023 $106,157 N/A 033X 35 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MNGR 1 $95,992 $95,992 $109,748 $17,355 033X 35 NETWORK SYSTEMS ENGINEER III 3 $101,525 $101,483 $111,065 $35,592 033X 35 SENIOR ARCHITECT (LICENSED)2 $99,757 $99,757 $111,304 $113,347 $27,181 033X 35 CYBERSECURITY ENGINEER II 2 $98,488 $98,488 $112,382 $29,718 035X 36 FINANCIAL MGR III 2 $111,405 $111,405 $115,424 $16,182 035X 36 SR SOFTWARE ENGINEER 2 $108,753 $108,753 $116,508 $119,496 $21,486 034X 36 RISK MANAGER 1 $102,357 $102,357 $119,526 $17,139 195 Grand Total:$1,061,850 Avg. Cost Per EE:$5,445 Compensation Recommendation #1: Adjust the City’s Market Midpoint 21 Cost recommendation that includes bringing each FTE in each job to the published survey midpoints equates to an estimated $1,061,850 or an average of $5,445 per employee. SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Additional Compensation Recommendations 22 Conduct compa-ratio and salary range penetration analysis. 1 Conduct small-scale salary surveys as needed to assess the market competitiveness of hard-to-fill classifications and/or classifications with retention issues and make adjustments to pay grade assignments if necessary. 2 Conduct a comprehensive classification and compensation study every three to five years. 3 SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS 23 Cash is Still King in This Market but Total Compensation Still Matters! In 2019, an Employee Benefit Study Benefit Analysis was conducted by NFP to provide economic value to Salt Lake City’s benefits. NFP reviewed all the employee benefits that included but not limited to: Medical Insurance HSA Bariatric Surgery Retirement STDi, LTDi Tuition Reimbursement Longevity Pay Paid Time Off Near Site Clinic Dental EAP 2019=$3,152 2022=$3,453 Future of the Job Landscape SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Now and the Future of the Job Landscape 25 Freelancers hit the mainstream. Companies are expected to bring an army of independent contractors into the mainstream. Work/life flexibility and employer branding on the rise in 2022. SLC can offer employees a sense of purpose with their jobs and careers. Remote work options and schedule flexibility are quickly becoming a standard expectation among job seekers, challenging organizations in both the private and public sector on how to manage. Organizations of all sizes should develop standards around change management. If you are a manager, ask yourself, “How will I keep my team informed? When will I share information? How will I anticipate and address concerns? What training or other support will I offer to make seemingly constant transition easier for my team members?” Identifying managers who actually prioritize company culture and excel in making people feel part of a team will be essential in a remote or hybrid work environment. SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Now and the Future of the Job Landscape Burnout of employees. Significant change is difficult for companies. Change can lead to burnout if not managed with care and consideration. Companies that are going to be best positioned in the future to take advantage of talent will realize that they need a gray-collar strategy. That means really thinking about upskilling, reskilling and continuing continuous learning, but not just for young workers. Leading organizations are not just looking at Gen Z and Millennials—they’re also adding more skills to the older workers’ palette through either reverse mentoring or through formal educational reimbursement. Company/Department sponsored events are good predictors of satisfaction with the workplace. Organizations that do a good job of organizing these events have lower attrition during the first six months and that’s been true during the Great Resignation as well. Compensation as a shared mission and shared sense of ownership. 26 SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Questions? Rachel Burt, PHR, SHRM-SCP HR Consultant rachel.burt@nfp.com Michael Ongkiko, SPHR, SHRM-SCP Managing Director michael.ongkiko@nfp.com 27 NFP.com © 2022 NFP Corp. All Rights Reserved Lisa Shaffer (Mar 8, 2022 15:19 MST)03/08/2022 03/08/2022 SALT LAKE CITY COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING REPORT 2022 FOR NON-REPRESENTED JOBS Prepared by: Michael Ongkiko SPHR, SHRM-SCP Managing Director Rachel Burt PHR, SHRM-SCP HR Consultant February 22, 2022 Final Report NFP 1 Contents Contents................................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.1: Study Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 2 Chapter 2: Assessment of Current Conditions ..................................................................................... 2 2.1: Current Pay Plan Analysis ............................................................................................................. 2 2.2: Verification of Current Method ....................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 3: Market Benchmarking Summary ......................................................................................... 4 3.1: Benchmarking Methods ................................................................................................................. 5 3.2: Compensation Benchmarking Results ........................................................................................... 7 Chapter 4: Solution and Recommendations ....................................................................................... 12 4.2: Cost Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 14 4.3: Compensation and Classification System Administration ............................................................ 16 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Addenda- Salt Lake City Compensation Sheets ................................................................................. 18 NFP 2 Chapter 1: Introduction Salt Lake City engaged NFP Human Resource Solutions to conduct a compensation benchmarking study of public agencies and private industries to collect current compensation data for the Utah local market for the City’s group of non-represented jobs. The collection of compensation data does not include all of the city’s 578 active job titles for non-represented employees, but rather includes only a subset of that group of only 64 benchmark jobs. Executives, some Directors and managers were not included in the benchmarking and analysis project. Goals included assisting Salt Lake City to make improvements to their overall compensation plan and the continued goal of maintaining Salt Lake City as a competitive employer. This includes understanding what changes are required in terms of compensation in order to retain and attract top talent. As part of the study, NFP was tasked with:  Collecting and reviewing current environmental data present at the City;  Conducting a benchmarking study utilizing market pay data from various sources and providing an external assessment summary to the City regarding current market competitiveness;  Developing strategic positioning recommendations using market data and best practices;  Developing an implementation cost plan for the City and  Developing and submitting draft and final reports summarizing findings and recommendations. 1.1: Study Methodology NFP combined qualitative and quantitative data analysis to produce an equitable solution to maximize the fairness and competitiveness of the City’s compensation structure and practices. Project activities included:  Conducting an external market salary survey;  Developing recommendations for compensation management;  Developing detailed implementation plans; and  Creating draft and final reports. Chapter 2: Assessment of Current Conditions A brief analysis was conducted to assess the existing compensation structure within the City as well as a brief review of current employee demographics. The process revealed information about the existing structure and demographics and should be considered as a snapshot in time. By reviewing information about the City’s compensation structure, philosophies, and employee demographics, NFP gained a better understanding of the structures and methods in place. This assisted in identifying issues for further review and revision potential. A summary of this assessment can be found in Chapter 2 of this report. 2.1: Current Pay Plan Analysis Salt Lake City’s pay plan has a separate pay range (minimum, midpoint (City Market), maximum) for each job. In the past, pay ranges have been established by reviewing data from external wage studies, including local customized surveys and slotting jobs accordingly into the pay ranges most closely aligned with market. A summary of Salt Lake City’s compensation plan is as follows:  There are thirty-two (32) grades from grade 10 to grade 41.  Pay ranges from a minimum to maximum average 69.11% (grades 39, 40, 41 were not calculated in average) NFP 3 Salt Lake City’s Current 2021 General Employee Pay Plan (GEPP) GRADE MINIMUM CITY MARKET MAXIMUM GRADE MINIMUM CITY MARKET MAXIMUM 10 $25,083 $32,756 $40,429 26 $52,601 $71,751 $90,878 11 $26,301 $34,408 $42,494 27 $55,209 $75,337 $95,486 12 $27,626 $36,430 $45,189 28 $57,948 $79,163 $100,355 13 $29,018 $37,951 $46,863 29 $60,883 $83,118 $105,354 14 $30,452 $39,690 $48,928 30 $63,926 $87,270 $110,636 15 $31,974 $42,016 $52,014 31 $67,121 $91,661 $116,179 16 $33,560 $44,472 $55,340 32 $70,468 $96,225 $121,961 17 $35,256 $46,254 $57,253 33 $74,011 $101,051 $128,090 18 $37,016 $49,167 $61,296 34 $77,706 $106,093 $134,502 19 $38,864 $51,362 $63,817 35 $81,575 $111,397 $141,219 20 $40,820 $53,536 $66,230 36 $85,662 $116,961 $148,283 21 $41,190 $56,166 $71,164 37 $89,944 $122,808 $155,673 22 $43,276 $59,035 $74,772 38 $94,443 $128,960 $163,455 23 $45,450 $61,991 $78,554 39 $99,181 $208,296 24 $47,711 $65,056 $82,423 40 $104,115 $218,664 25 $50,080 $68,295 $86,531 41 $109,332 $354,732 Best practice of compensation salary plan structure ranges are:  Non-Exempt Job Range Widths: 40%  Exempt Job Range Widths: 50%  Executive Job Range Widths: 60% Employee Salary Placement by Grade It is important to analyze where employees’ salaries fell within each pay range when assessing the effectiveness of the City’s pay plan and practices. It is equally important to determine where there may have been clusters of employees’ salaries within the current pay plan, illuminating potential pay progression concerns. It should be noted that employees’ salaries, and the progression of the salaries, are associated with an organization’s compensation philosophy—specifically, the method of salary progression and the availability of resources. Therefore, the placement of employees’ salaries should be viewed in this context. Salary Placement of Employees’ Salaries Relative to Pay Grade Minimums and Maximums There are 0 employees with salaries below the minimum or at the minimum of the grade, There are 0 employees with salaries at the maximum and 0 employees with salaries above the maximum. Employees with salaries at the grade minimum are typically new hires or new to the classification following a NFP 4 recent promotion; also, employees with salaries at the grade maximum are typically highly experienced and proficient in the classification. Salary Placement of Employees’ Salaries Relative to Pay Grade Midpoints Most of the employee’s average and median salaries are clustered near the City Market (midpoint). There is not much variation and spread among employee’s salaries. With a diverse workforce, having multi-generations in the workplace, and with differing levels of experience and various years of tenure, one would expect that City salaries would be spread more evenly across the grade. An analysis was completed only utilizing the average and median pay of SLC non-represented employees. Individual salaries were not compared to the midpoint of each grade and tenure and performance was not taken into consideration. Even utilizing the average and median pay of employees within each grade can give us some perspective on how competitive pay when compared to internal factors. In this case, an analysis was completed for jobs that were 5% below the City Market or Midpoint. Employees with salaries close to the midpoint of a pay range should be fully proficient in their classification and require minimal supervision to complete their job duties while performing satisfactorily. Within this framework, grade midpoint is commonly considered to be the salary an individual could reasonably expect for similar work in the market. Therefore, it is important to examine the percentage and number of employees with salaries above and below the calculated midpoint. Twenty-eight (28) job titles had salaries below the City Market or midpoint of at least 5% with five (5) jobs more than 10% below the City Market or Midpoint. Salt Lake City employees averaged 2.47% (comparing the average salaries) and 2.49% (comparing the median salaries) below the City Market or Midpoint. Only two (2) jobs were above the City Market or Midpoint: Legal Secretary, 11.01% (comparing the average salaries)/16.34% (comparing the median salaries) Risk Management Specialist, 17.27% (comparing the average and median salaries) 2.2: Verification of Current Method Historically, employees in the non-represented group have not been advanced through their respective pay ranges as frequently as employees covered under collective bargaining agreements. Typically, when increases have occurred, increases have been significantly less than the employees who fall under collective bargaining agreements. Annual salary increases have typically been below market rates. In July 2021, Salt Lake City’s pay structure and pay grades were both increased 4.5%. The compensation philosophy stated is to pay at market or midpoint for each job and strategically set market pay at the highest wage found via wage surveys and benchmarking tools. Targeted pay for an employee who is fully proficient in a role and meeting expectations is at the market range (50th percentile) or midpoint. Pay scales set within +/- 2% of market average will be considered competitive. Chapter 3: Market Benchmarking Summary Market comparisons provide the best and most direct methods of determining an organization’s relative job in the marketplace. Specifically, market comparisons focus on the average of the market and range characteristics. Market data can be used to evaluate overall structure, to include pay ranges; summarize overall market competitiveness; and capture current highs and lows of the City’s pay plan at a fixed point in NFP 5 time. Using this methodology to collect market data is not an ideal tool for comparing individual salaries. Rather, its intent is to provide an analysis of overall market competiveness of the organization’s salary structure. When using a sampling approach of market characteristics, a market comparison is not typically the sole determiner of recommended pay levels by classification, as it does not allow for specific, quantifiable salary recommendations for individuals. Based on these factors, market analysis does not translate well at the individual level, as individual pay is determined through a combination of factors including geographical job market, performance, prior experience, and the individual’s negotiation skills during the hiring process, as well as the supply and demand for the specific type of job. High demand fields can dictate higher salaries in today’s labor market in much the same way as IT professionals have in years past. In this local market, accountants, IT, engineering and technical jobs such as welders and HVAC personnel have seen both entry and experienced levels increase at a rapid rate. Prior to presenting the market analysis for the City’s group of non-represented benchmark jobs, it should be noted that these comparisons are best thought of as a snapshot of current market conditions. Since market conditions change, and in some cases change quickly, market wage surveys are useful for making updates to a salary structure. However, surveys must be performed at regular intervals if Salt Lake City wishes to stay current with the marketplace. Market data are most useful in making adjustments to overall pay plans, and ultimately, and making job classification placements within the overall pay structure. Salt Lake City’s Human Resources department targeted 64 jobs to be analyzed using published survey data. 3.1: Benchmarking Methods ERI Data, CompAnaylst and PayScale Compensation Benchmarking Four (4) main sources of compensation benchmarking data were utilized in Salt Lake City’s compensation benchmarking project. These sources include: CompAnalyst ERI Payscale Compdata Multiple cuts of data were employed within each published survey source which included: Private industry Public entities, government, public administration, non-profit Revenue size Budget Numbers of full-time FTEs Each cut of data found above was sourced for the Salt Lake City area, the State of Utah and the Wasatch front. Survey data if applicable, was aged accordingly to reflect current data for early 2022. Weighted Averages A number of weighted average survey data was used in the analysis shown in each of the following compensation sheets. Each survey utilized in the compensation analysis has four (4) cuts of data in which the overall compensation for the job is calculated. Then, another weighted average is reflected between three surveys for the final market data. Please refer to “Reading the Compensation Sheet” for further detail. NFP 6 ERI With current market data for more than 1,000 industry sectors, ERI (Economic Research Institute) compiles the most robust salary, cost-of-living and executive compensation survey data available. The majority of the Fortune 500 and thousands of other small and medium-sized organizations, rely on ERI data and analytics for compensation and salary planning, relocations, disability determinations, board professionals, and setting branch office salary structures in the United States, Canada, and worldwide. ERI collects data from thousands of available salary surveys, not just those published by the largest survey firms. ERI collects available salary survey data for jobs and areas; evaluates each survey for validity, reliability, and use; and compiles updated market values for jobs with comparable responsibilities. Analysis is conducted on wages by geographic area, size of company, years of experience, and industry. Data values are automatically updated to match today's market movement rates, and the default projected market increase projections, like the other variables, can be adjusted depending on preferences. ERI results are all market- based and reflect current market values. CompAnalyst CompAnalyst Market Data is a 100 percent HR-reported dataset. This data is gathered from employers and does not include any self-reported data from employees. CompAnalyst purchases more than 300 commercially available surveys annually. The methodology behind Salary.com’s/CompAnalyst Market Data is a state-of-the-art process for benchmarking and analyzing jobs that builds on the professional industry standards employed by compensation analysts. When adding jobs to the CompAnalyst Market Data database, Salary.com’s team of compensation consultants selects and validates surveys, benchmarks jobs to multiple surveys, aggregates data, and reviews and adjusts results as necessary, to produce accurate results for every job, every time. To determine the true market rate for each job reported in CompAnalyst, the Salary.com team reviews all available market pay data on a monthly basis, ensuring that CompAnalyst users have access to up-to-date, accurate market data. With this unique methodology, Salary.com is able to publish an up-to-date estimated salary range for any job in any market, even when individual surveys do not have sufficient data for that job or market. Utilizing CompAnalyst’s architecture, which defines relationships between job family, function, and focus, Salary.com is able to fill in the gaps left by traditional compensation surveys, producing accurate estimated salaries for jobs that other data sources do not cover. CompAnalyst Market Data includes data from more than 7,500 organizations across 225 diverse industry breakouts. The data covers companies of all sizes, ownership types, and tax-exempt statuses. Payscale PayScale’s methodology leverages employee submitted data and a proprietary algorithm giving organizations the ability to benchmark their jobs based on fresh market data. Derived directly from HRIS systems, Peer data is 100% employer-reported, and never crowdsourced. Creator of the largest database of individual compensation profiles in the world, PayScale, Inc. provides an immediate and precise snapshot of current market salaries to employees and employers through its online tools and software. PayScale’s products are powered by innovative search and query algorithms that dynamically acquire, analyze and aggregate compensation information for millions of individuals in real time. P Compdata Survey (Western region cut) This cut of data provides access to executive and general staff compensation data from more than 3,700 organizations across most industries. 63,000 organizations submitted data for over 570 jobs. The survey was NFP 7 aged accordingly to provide current wage data from the October 2021 release. TERMINOLOGY USED IN THIS REPORT  Minimum - defines the lowest pay for a job.  Midpoint - defines the middle pay for a job.  Maximum Pay - defines the highest pay for a job.  Median Pay - The value separating the higher half from the lower half of a data sample. For a data set, it may be thought of as the "middle" value.  Actual Average Base Rate - a number expressing the central or typical value in a set of data, in particular the mean.  Compa-ratio - the percentage obtained by dividing the actual salary paid to an employee by the midpoint of the salary range for that job.  Range Penetration - calculates where an employee’s salary specifically falls within a pay range.  Benchmarked Job -job that has a standard and consistent set of responsibilities from one organization to another and for which data is available in valid and reliable salary surveys.  The Base 25th Percentile - marks where 25% of the reported values are lower than the figure given and 75% are higher.  The Base 50th percentile – Median. The lower half of salaries for this job fall below the fiftieth percentile while the upper half are above it. The 50th percentile is the most widely-used measure of the “middle” of the possible pay values for a job..  The Base 75th percentile - marks where 75% of the reported values are lower than the figure given and 25% are higher.  TCC – Total Cash Compensation, which can include but not limited to base salary, commissions, cash bonuses, amounts vested. 3.3: Compensation Benchmarking Results Market Minimums Since the compensation, benchmarking data only details the “average 25% Base” and does not give a minimum salary amount that an organization or public entity would spend at the minimum of the pay grade to pay an inexperienced employee, this analysis was not completed. Market Midpoints The midpoint of the range is the level at which, typically, the most statistically accurate representation of the actual value of a job can be measured. When examining the overall competitive job of a specific job, many organizations will look solely at the midpoint in ascertaining a specific “market value.” Looking at the organization’s competitive job against the market peer average at the midpoint is helpful in building the pieces for a comprehensive solution that fits the overall needs of the organization. The 3A exhibit found below depicts benchmarking data from the four (4) compensation tools and is averaged from those sources. This data compares the following:  Salt Lake City’s Average Pay of job salaries compared to the benchmarked 50th Percentile. This data is shown as a percentage and as the difference in salary.  Salt Lake City’s Midpoint compared to the benchmarked 50th Percentile. This data is shown as a percentage and as the difference in salary. NFP’s analysis is summarized below. NFP 8 1. Reviewing all the sixty-four (64) job’s average salaries in each grade and comparing to the benchmarked 50th Percentile data, the City is: -3.09% below the market midpoint (average for all jobs). This dollar amount averages -$3,366 below the market across all jobs or a median dollar amount of - $1,991. 2. Reviewing Salt Lake City’s market midpoints in each grade and comparing to the benchmarked 50th Percentile data, the City is: -0.83% below the market midpoint This dollar amount averages -$1,491 below the benchmarked midpoint of market or a median dollar amount of $-926. When comparing the benchmarked 50th Percentile and the City’s Midpoint, jobs ranged from a low of -25.81% below market for the Fleet Management Service Supervisor position to a high of 32.4% above market for the Collection Officer. Below Market Jobs Based on the data gathered at the market midpoint of the salary range, the following can be determined:  Of the 64 City jobs for which market midpoint data was collected, 34 jobs or 53.1% of the jobs are below the benchmarked 50th Percentile when you compare the results to Salt Lake City’s average pay for each job  Of the jobs below market, sixteen (16) jobs were greater than 10% below market and are listed below: Job Title % Difference Between SLC Average Pay & Benchmarked Midpoint (50th Base) FLEET MANAGEMENT SERVICE SUPERVISOR -27.27% LABORATORY PROGRAM MANAGER -18.19% FINANCIAL ANALYST III -17.72% SENIOR LABORATORY CHEMIST -17.16% AUDITOR III -14.59% RISK MANAGER -14.36% ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II -14.36% SR PURCHASING CONSULTANT -14.19% SOCIAL WORK DIRECTOR -12.69% REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MNGR -12.53% CYBERSECURITY ENGINEER II -12.36% PAYROLL AND ACCOUNTING MANAGER -12.19% FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR -12.14% MANAGEMENT ANALYST -12.09% NFP 9 SENIOR ARCHITECT (LICENSED) -10.37% NETWORK SUPPORT ADMINISTRATOR II -10.13% There are thirteen (13) that were more than 10% or more below the “benchmarked 50th Percentile when you compared the results to the City’s Midpoint. The jobs are: Job Title % Difference SLC Midpoint & Benchmarked Midpoint FLEET MANAGEMENT SERVICE SUPERVISOR -25.81% LABORATORY PROGRAM MANAGER -19.00% SENIOR LABORATORY CHEMIST -18.93% LEGAL SECRETARY III -18.47% LAW OFFICE MANAGER -17.62% ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II -14.35% SOCIAL WORK DIRECTOR -12.69% SR PURCHASING CONSULTANT -12.45% FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR -12.29% MANAGEMENT ANALYST -11.63% RISK MANAGER -11.24% FINANCIAL ANALYST III -10.73% CYBERSECURITY ENGINEER II -10.08% Above Market Jobs Based on the compensation market data gathered at the market midpoint of the salary range, the following can be determined:  Of the 64 City jobs for which market midpoint data was collected, 18 jobs or 28.1% of the jobs are above the market benchmarked 50th Percentile  Of the jobs above market, five (5) jobs were greater than 10% above market and are listed below: Job Title % Difference Between SLC Average Pay & Benchmarked Midpoint (50th Base) COLLECTIONS MANAGER 22.86% COLLECTIONS OFFICER 19.20% GIS PROGRAMMER ANALYST II 18.34% SOCIAL WORK MANAGER 17.24% PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 16.13% There are seven (7) jobs that were more than 10% or more above the benchmarked 50th Percentile when you compared the results to the City’s midpoint. The jobs are: NFP 10 Job Title % Difference SLC Midpoint & Benchmarked Midpoint COLLECTIONS OFFICER 32.47% COLLECTIONS MANAGER 29.29% GIS PROGRAMMER ANALYST II 23.36% PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 16.15% SOCIAL WORK MANAGER 15.73% LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT III 11.22% SOFTWARE ENGINEER DATABASE 10.18% At Market Jobs Based on the data gathered at the market midpoint of the salary range, the following can be determined:  Of the 64 City jobs for which market 50th Percentile data was collected, 12 jobs or 18.8% of the jobs are at market compared to the benchmarked 50th Percentile.  However, of the jobs above market, two (2) jobs were greater than 10% above the benchmarked 50th Percentile compared to the City’s midpoint and are listed below: Job Title % Difference SLC Midpoint & Benchmarked Midpoint CITY PAYROLL ADMINISTRATOR -12.94% INFO TECH PROJECT MANAGER -9.64% Market Maximums The market maximum is significant because it represents the most that an organization would typically spend to retain qualified incumbents. If incumbents’ salaries are clustered at or near the maximum, however, this may be an indication that the salary range widths are too narrow, and that the salary maximums may be below the market average. Since the compensation, benchmarking data only details the “average 75% Base” and does not give a maximum salary amount an organization or public entity would spend to retain an employee, this analysis was not completed. Summary of Compensation Survey Results The survey found that with Salt Lake City’s jobs related to the 50th Percentile:  18 jobs or 28.1% of the jobs are more than 2% above the market’s 50th Percentile.  12 jobs or 18.8% of the jobs are within +/- 2% of market’s 50th Percentile.  34 jobs or 53.1% of the jobs are more than 2% below market’s 50th Percentile. Actual Salt Lake City average salaries and median salaries were in most cases were very similar when comparing both. There are a few exceptions:  Legal Secretary Difference of $2,621 between Median ($57,200) and Average ($54,579)  Software Support Admin III Difference of $3,817 between Average ($96,294) and Median ($92,477)  Business Systems Analyst Difference of $2,219 between Median ($87.277) and Average ($85,058) NFP 11  Collections Officer Difference of $2,194 between Average ($48,173) and Median ($45,978) It should be noted that the standing of a job’s pay range compared to the market is not a definitive assessment of the individual employee’s salaries being equally above or below market. It does, however, speak to the City’s ability to recruit and retain talent over time. Since the results make a case that pay is below what the market would offer, the City may experience the loss of employees to their market peers or lose out to other competitor cities/entities when recruiting to fill a job. With the ranges at some levels being below that of the City’s peers, long tenured employees may consider other options based on salary differences being offered by the competition. Exhibit 3A Salt Lake City Salary Survey Market Differentials Grade Job Title # of incumbents SLC Average pay SLC Median Pay Benchmarking Comparison‐Midpoint (50th Base) % Difference Between SLC Average Pay & Benchmarked Midpoint (50th Base) Difference in $‐SLC Avg. Pay Compared to Benchmarked Midpoint (50th Base) % Difference SLC Midpoint & Benchmarked Midpoint Difference in $‐SLC Midpoint & Benchmarked Midpoint Salt Lake City‐ Midpoint/Market Comparison SLC Average Pay of Salaries to Benchmarked Midpoint (50th Base) 027X ACCOUNTANT III 13 $74,800 $75,338 $78,324 -4.50%-$3,524 -3.81%-$2,987 $75,337 Below Market 021X ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II 1 $56,160 $56,160 $65,574 -14.36%-$9,414 -14.35%-$9,408 $56,166 Below Market 028X AUDITOR III 1 $71,261 $71,261 $83,430 -14.59%-$12,169 -5.11%-$4,267 $79,163 Below Market 025X BILLING OFFICE SUPERVISOR 1 $68,994 $68,994 $70,528 -2.18%-$1,534 -3.17%-$2,233 $68,295 At Market 030X BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 6 $85,058 $87,277 $81,991 3.74%$3,067 6.44%$5,279 $87,270 Above Market 029X CITY CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR 1 $78,957 $78,957 $76,422 3.32%$2,535 8.76%$6,696 $83,118 Above Market 026X CITY PAYROLL ADMINISTRATOR 2 $63,492 $63,492 $63,530 -0.06%-$38 12.94%$8,221 $71,751 At Market 030X COLLECTIONS MANAGER 1 $82,930 $82,930 $67,499 22.86%$15,431 29.29%$19,771 $87,270 Above Market 020X COLLECTIONS OFFICER 4 $48,173 $45,978 $40,413 19.20%$7,760 32.47%$13,123 $53,536 Above Market 029X COMPENSATION ANALYST 1 $83,117 $83,117 $79,247 4.88%$3,870 4.88%$3,871 $83,118 Above Market 029X CUSTOMER SERVICE MGR 0 $83,117 $83,117 $81,972 1.40%$1,145 1.40%$1,146 $83,118 At Market 023X CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR 1 $62,608 $62,608 $63,599 -1.56%-$991 -2.53%-$1,608 $61,991 At Market 033X CYBERSECURITY ENGINEER II 2 $98,488 $98,488 $112,382 -12.36%-$13,894 -10.08%-$11,331 $101,051 Below Market 031X ENGINEER IV 13 $87,213 $87,069 $87,930 -0.82%-$717 4.24%$3,731 $91,661 At Market 025X FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 5 $68,411 $68,286 $77,867 -12.14%-$9,456 -12.29%-$9,572 $68,295 Below Market 029X FINANCIAL ANALYST III 6 $76,610 $74,797 $93,112 -17.72%-$16,502 -10.73%-$9,994 $83,118 Below Market 035X FINANCIAL MGR III 2 $111,405 $111,405 $115,424 -3.48%-$4,019 -3.49%-$4,027 $111,397 Below Market 025X FLEET MANAGEMENT SERVICE SUPERVISOR 6 $66,955 $67,621 $92,060 -27.27%-$25,105 -25.81%-$23,765 $68,295 Below Market 026X FORENSIC SCIENTIST II 4 $66,300 $66,227 $65,833 0.71%$467 8.08%$5,318 $71,151 At Market 033X GEO INFO SYSTEMS (GIS) MGR 3 $90,771 $92,685 $96,658 -6.09%-$5,887 4.54%$4,393 $101,051 Below Market 030X GIS PROGRAMMER ANALYST II 4 $83,720 $83,990 $70,746 18.34%$12,974 23.36%$16,524 $87,270 Above Market 025X GRAPHIC DESIGN SPECIALIST II 0 $68,286 $68,286 $65,972 3.51%$2,314 3.52%$2,323 $68,295 Above Market 024X HOUSING & REHAB LOAN OFFICER 1 $61,818 $61,818 $59,523 3.85%$2,295 9.30%$5,533 $65,056 Above Market 021X HOUSING LOAN ADMIN 1 $54,475 $54,475 $56,112 -2.92%-$1,637 0.10%$54 $56,166 Below Market 030X HR BUSINESS PARTNER II 6 $85,249 $85,197 $87,424 -2.49%-$2,175 -0.18%-$154 $87,270 Below Market 025X HR RECRUITER 1 $65,000 $65,000 $65,284 -0.44%-$284 4.61%$3,011 $68,295 At Market 030X HRIS ANALYST 2 $89,471 $89,471 $89,310 0.18%$161 -2.28%-$2,040 $87,270 At Market 030X HUMAN RESOURCES SUPERVISOR 3 $82,146 $82,909 $82,683 -0.65%-$537 5.55%$4,587 $87,270 At Market 035X INFO TECH PROJECT MANAGER 2 $100,589 $100,589 $101,602 -1.00%-$1,013 9.64%$9,795 $111,397 At Market 029X LABORATORY PROGRAM MANAGER 1 $83,949 $83,949 $102,615 -18.19%-$18,666 -19.00%-$19,497 $83,118 Below Market 029X LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT III 1 $78,957 $78,957 $74,730 5.66%$4,227 11.22%$8,388 $83,118 Above Market 021X LAW OFFICE MANAGER 1 $63,690 $63,690 $68,177 -6.58%-$4,487 -17.62%-$12,011 $56,166 Below Market 027X LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST 1 $70,637 $70,637 $74,162 -4.75%-$3,525 1.58%$1,175 $75,337 Below Market 018X LEGAL SECRETARY III 3 $54,579 $57,200 $60,304 -9.49%-$5,725 -18.47%-$11,137 $49,167 Below Market 026X LICENSED CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER 1 $68,182 $68,182 $72,758 -6.29%-$4,576 -1.38%-$1,007 $71,751 Below Market 024X MANAGEMENT ANALYST 3 $64,716 $65,062 $73,616 -12.09%-$8,900 -11.63%-$8,560 $65,056 Below Market 031X NETWORK ENGINEER II 1 $91,666 $91,666 $93,698 -2.17%-$2,032 -2.17%-$2,037 $91,661 Below Market 025X NETWORK SUPPORT ADMINISTRATOR II 7 $62,139 $61,942 $69,140 -10.13%-$7,001 -1.22%-$845 $68,295 Below Market 033X NETWORK SYSTEMS ENGINEER III 3 $101,525 $101,483 $111,065 -8.59%-$9,540 -9.02%-$10,014 $101,051 Below Market 019X OFFICE FACILITATOR II (OFFICE MANAGER)30 $51,451 $51,334 $52,058 -1.17%-$607 -1.34%-$696 $51,362 At Market 023X PARALEGAL 6 $60,871 $60,746 $61,400 -0.86%-$529 0.96%$591 $61,991 At Market 031X PAYROLL AND ACCOUNTING MANAGER 1 $87,360 $87,360 $99,488 -12.19%-$12,128 -7.87%-$7,827 $91,661 Below Market 024X PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST I 2 $61,558 $61,558 $64,371 -4.37%-$2,813 1.06%$685 $65,056 Below Market 026X PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 1 $71,739 $71,739 $61,777 16.13%$9,962 16.15%$9,974 $71,751 Above Market 031X REAL PROPERTY MANAGER 1 $91,666 $91,666 $88,668 3.38%$2,998 3.38%$2,993 $91,661 Above Market 033X REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MNGR 1 $95,992 $95,992 $109,748 -12.53%-$13,756 -7.92%-$8,697 $101,051 Below Market 024X RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST 1 $76,294 $76,294 $73,100 4.37%$3,194 -11.00%-$8,044 $65,056 Above Market 034X RISK MANAGER 1 $102,357 $102,357 $119,526 -14.36%-$17,169 -11.24%-$13,433 $106,093 Below Market 026X SAFETY COORDINATOR 3 $72,793 $72,446 $74,742 -2.61%-$1,949 -4.00%-$2,991 $71,751 Below Market 031X SAFETY PROGRAM MGR 2 $91,666 $91,666 $100,962 -9.21%-$9,296 -9.21%-$9,301 $91,661 Below Market 033X SENIOR ARCHITECT (LICENSED)2 $99,757 $99,757 $111,304 -10.37%-$11,547 -9.21%-$10,253 $101,051 Below Market 028X SENIOR CLAIMS ADJUSTER 1 $77,189 $77,189 $77,760 -0.73%-$571 1.80%$1,403 $79,163 At Market 019X SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES TECH 4 $49,457 $49,358 $52,847 -6.41%-$3,390 -2.81%-$1,485 $51,362 Below Market 026X SENIOR LABORATORY CHEMIST 1 $73,320 $73,320 $88,507 -17.16%-$15,187 -18.93%-$16,756 $71,751 Below Market 021X SOCIAL SERVICE WORKER (CSW)5 $58,082 $58,698 $56,615 2.59%$1,467 -0.79%-$449 $56,166 Above Market 031X SOCIAL WORK DIRECTOR 1 $91,666 $91,666 $104,985 -12.69%-$13,319 -12.69%-$13,324 $91,661 Below Market 029X SOCIAL WORK MANAGER 2 $84,198 $84,198 $71,820 17.24%$12,378 15.73%$11,298 $83,118 Above Market 036X SOFTWARE ENGINEER DATABASE 2 $109,023 $109,023 $106,157 2.70%$2,866 10.18%$10,804 $116,961 Above Market 033X SOFTWARE ENGINEER III 2 $97,448 $97,448 $104,073 -6.37%-$6,625 -2.90%-$3,022 $101,051 Below Market 032X SOFTWARE SUPPORT ADMIN III 4 $96,294 $92,477 $90,857 5.98%$5,437 5.91%$5,368 $96,225 At Market 027X SR PURCHASING CONSULTANT 1 $73,840 $73,840 $86,051 -14.19%-$12,211 -12.45%-$10,714 $75,337 Below Market 035X SR SOFTWARE ENGINEER 2 $108,753 $108,753 $116,508 -6.66%-$7,755 -4.39%-$5,111 $111,397 Below Market 033X SYSTEMS ENGINEER III 1 $97,760 $97,760 $102,235 -4.38%-$4,475 -1.16%-$1,184 $101,051 Below Market 024X WAREHOUSE SUPERVISOR 3 $63,412 $65,062 $61,484 3.14%$1,928 5.81%$3,572 $65,056 Above Market NFP 12 Exhibit 3B Salt Lake City Salary Survey Market Differentials Sorted by Above, At and Below Market Chapter 4: Solution and Recommendations The proposed solution followed Salt Lake City’s compensation philosophy NFP’s recommendations in conjunction with Salt Lake City’s Human Resources were made to improve the City’s compensation structure based on the findings from the data analysis and the City’s desired market job. Chapter 4 of this report Grade Job Title # of incumbents SLC Average pay SLC Median Pay Benchmarking Comparison‐Midpoint (50th Base) % Difference Between SLC Average Pay & Benchmarked Midpoint (50th Base) Difference in $‐SLC Avg. Pay Compared to Benchmarked Midpoint (50th Base) % Difference SLC Midpoint & Benchmarked Midpoint Difference in $‐SLC Midpoint & Benchmarked Midpoint Salt Lake City‐ Midpoint/Market Comparison SLC Average Pay of Salaries to Benchmarked Midpoint (50th Base) 027X ACCOUNTANT III 13 $74,800 $75,338 $78,324 -4.50%-$3,524 -3.81%-$2,987 $75,337 Below Market 021X ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II 1 $56,160 $56,160 $65,574 -14.36%-$9,414 -14.35%-$9,408 $56,166 Below Market 028X AUDITOR III 1 $71,261 $71,261 $83,430 -14.59%-$12,169 -5.11%-$4,267 $79,163 Below Market 033X CYBERSECURITY ENGINEER II 2 $98,488 $98,488 $112,382 -12.36%-$13,894 -10.08%-$11,331 $101,051 Below Market 025X FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 5 $68,411 $68,286 $77,867 -12.14%-$9,456 -12.29%-$9,572 $68,295 Below Market 029X FINANCIAL ANALYST III 6 $76,610 $74,797 $93,112 -17.72%-$16,502 -10.73%-$9,994 $83,118 Below Market 035X FINANCIAL MGR III 2 $111,405 $111,405 $115,424 -3.48%-$4,019 -3.49%-$4,027 $111,397 Below Market 025X FLEET MANAGEMENT SERVICE SUPERVISOR 6 $66,955 $67,621 $92,060 -27.27%-$25,105 -25.81%-$23,765 $68,295 Below Market 033X GEO INFO SYSTEMS (GIS) MGR 3 $90,771 $92,685 $96,658 -6.09%-$5,887 4.54%$4,393 $101,051 Below Market 021X HOUSING LOAN ADMIN 1 $54,475 $54,475 $56,112 -2.92%-$1,637 0.10%$54 $56,166 Below Market 030X HR BUSINESS PARTNER II 6 $85,249 $85,197 $87,424 -2.49%-$2,175 -0.18%-$154 $87,270 Below Market 029X LABORATORY PROGRAM MANAGER 1 $83,949 $83,949 $102,615 -18.19%-$18,666 -19.00%-$19,497 $83,118 Below Market 021X LAW OFFICE MANAGER 1 $63,690 $63,690 $68,177 -6.58%-$4,487 -17.62%-$12,011 $56,166 Below Market 027X LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST 1 $70,637 $70,637 $74,162 -4.75%-$3,525 1.58%$1,175 $75,337 Below Market 018X LEGAL SECRETARY III 3 $54,579 $57,200 $60,304 -9.49%-$5,725 -18.47%-$11,137 $49,167 Below Market 026X (LCSW)1 $68,182 $68,182 $72,758 -6.29%-$4,576 -1.38%-$1,007 $71,751 Below Market 024X MANAGEMENT ANALYST 3 $64,716 $65,062 $73,616 -12.09%-$8,900 -11.63%-$8,560 $65,056 Below Market 031X NETWORK ENGINEER II 1 $91,666 $91,666 $93,698 -2.17%-$2,032 -2.17%-$2,037 $91,661 Below Market 025X NETWORK SUPPORT ADMINISTRATOR II 7 $62,139 $61,942 $69,140 -10.13%-$7,001 -1.22%-$845 $68,295 Below Market 033X NETWORK SYSTEMS ENGINEER III 3 $101,525 $101,483 $111,065 -8.59%-$9,540 -9.02%-$10,014 $101,051 Below Market 031X PAYROLL AND ACCOUNTING MANAGER 1 $87,360 $87,360 $99,488 -12.19%-$12,128 -7.87%-$7,827 $91,661 Below Market 024X PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST I 2 $61,558 $61,558 $64,371 -4.37%-$2,813 1.06%$685 $65,056 Below Market 033X REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MNGR 1 $95,992 $95,992 $109,748 -12.53%-$13,756 -7.92%-$8,697 $101,051 Below Market 034X RISK MANAGER 1 $102,357 $102,357 $119,526 -14.36%-$17,169 -11.24%-$13,433 $106,093 Below Market 026X SAFETY COORDINATOR 3 $72,793 $72,446 $74,742 -2.61%-$1,949 -4.00%-$2,991 $71,751 Below Market 031X SAFETY PROGRAM MGR 2 $91,666 $91,666 $100,962 -9.21%-$9,296 -9.21%-$9,301 $91,661 Below Market 033X SENIOR ARCHITECT (LICENSED)2 $99,757 $99,757 $111,304 -10.37%-$11,547 -9.21%-$10,253 $101,051 Below Market 019X SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES TECH 4 $49,457 $49,358 $52,847 -6.41%-$3,390 -2.81%-$1,485 $51,362 Below Market 026X SENIOR LABORATORY CHEMIST 1 $73,320 $73,320 $88,507 -17.16%-$15,187 -18.93%-$16,756 $71,751 Below Market 031X SOCIAL WORK DIRECTOR 1 $91,666 $91,666 $104,985 -12.69%-$13,319 -12.69%-$13,324 $91,661 Below Market 033X SOFTWARE ENGINEER III 2 $97,448 $97,448 $104,073 -6.37%-$6,625 -2.90%-$3,022 $101,051 Below Market 027X SR PURCHASING CONSULTANT 1 $73,840 $73,840 $86,051 -14.19%-$12,211 -12.45%-$10,714 $75,337 Below Market 035X SR SOFTWARE ENGINEER 2 $108,753 $108,753 $116,508 -6.66%-$7,755 -4.39%-$5,111 $111,397 Below Market 033X SYSTEMS ENGINEER III 1 $97,760 $97,760 $102,235 -4.38%-$4,475 -1.16%-$1,184 $101,051 Below Market 025X BILLING OFFICE SUPERVISOR 1 $68,994 $68,994 $70,528 -2.18%-$1,534 -3.17%-$2,233 $68,295 At Market 026X CITY PAYROLL ADMINISTRATOR 2 $63,492 $63,492 $63,530 -0.06%-$38 12.94%$8,221 $71,751 At Market 029X CUSTOMER SERVICE MGR 0 $83,117 $83,117 $81,972 1.40%$1,145 1.40%$1,146 $83,118 At Market 023X CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR 1 $62,608 $62,608 $63,599 -1.56%-$991 -2.53%-$1,608 $61,991 At Market 031X ENGINEER IV 13 $87,213 $87,069 $87,930 -0.82%-$717 4.24%$3,731 $91,661 At Market 026X FORENSIC SCIENTIST II 4 $66,300 $66,227 $65,833 0.71%$467 8.08%$5,318 $71,151 At Market 025X HR RECRUITER 1 $65,000 $65,000 $65,284 -0.44%-$284 4.61%$3,011 $68,295 At Market 030X HRIS ANALYST 2 $89,471 $89,471 $89,310 0.18%$161 -2.28%-$2,040 $87,270 At Market 030X HUMAN RESOURCES SUPERVISOR 3 $82,146 $82,909 $82,683 -0.65%-$537 5.55%$4,587 $87,270 At Market 035X INFO TECH PROJECT MANAGER 2 $100,589 $100,589 $101,602 -1.00%-$1,013 9.64%$9,795 $111,397 At Market 019X OFFICE FACILITATOR II (OFFICE MANAGER)30 $51,451 $51,334 $52,058 -1.17%-$607 -1.34%-$696 $51,362 At Market 023X PARALEGAL 6 $60,871 $60,746 $61,400 -0.86%-$529 0.96%$591 $61,991 At Market 028X SENIOR CLAIMS ADJUSTER 1 $77,189 $77,189 $77,760 -0.73%-$571 1.80%$1,403 $79,163 At Market 032X SOFTWARE SUPPORT ADMIN III 4 $96,294 $92,477 $90,857 5.98%$5,437 5.91%$5,368 $96,225 At Market 030X BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 6 $85,058 $87,277 $81,991 3.74%$3,067 6.44%$5,279 $87,270 Above Market 029X CITY CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR 1 $78,957 $78,957 $76,422 3.32%$2,535 8.76%$6,696 $83,118 Above Market 030X COLLECTIONS MANAGER 1 $82,930 $82,930 $67,499 22.86%$15,431 29.29%$19,771 $87,270 Above Market 020X COLLECTIONS OFFICER 4 $48,173 $45,978 $40,413 19.20%$7,760 32.47%$13,123 $53,536 Above Market 029X COMPENSATION ANALYST 1 $83,117 $83,117 $79,247 4.88%$3,870 4.88%$3,871 $83,118 Above Market 030X GIS PROGRAMMER ANALYST II 4 $83,720 $83,990 $70,746 18.34%$12,974 23.36%$16,524 $87,270 Above Market 025X GRAPHIC DESIGN SPECIALIST II 0 $68,286 $68,286 $65,972 3.51%$2,314 3.52%$2,323 $68,295 Above Market 024X HOUSING & REHAB LOAN OFFICER 1 $61,818 $61,818 $59,523 3.85%$2,295 9.30%$5,533 $65,056 Above Market 029X LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT III 1 $78,957 $78,957 $74,730 5.66%$4,227 11.22%$8,388 $83,118 Above Market 026X PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 1 $71,739 $71,739 $61,777 16.13%$9,962 16.15%$9,974 $71,751 Above Market 031X REAL PROPERTY MANAGER 1 $91,666 $91,666 $88,668 3.38%$2,998 3.38%$2,993 $91,661 Above Market 024X RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST 1 $76,294 $76,294 $73,100 4.37%$3,194 -11.00%-$8,044 $65,056 Above Market 021X SOCIAL SERVICE WORKER (CSW)5 $58,082 $58,698 $56,615 2.59%$1,467 -0.79%-$449 $56,166 Above Market 029X SOCIAL WORK MANAGER 2 $84,198 $84,198 $71,820 17.24%$12,378 15.73%$11,298 $83,118 Above Market 036X SOFTWARE ENGINEER DATABASE 2 $109,023 $109,023 $106,157 2.70%$2,866 10.18%$10,804 $116,961 Above Market 024X WAREHOUSE SUPERVISOR 3 $63,412 $65,062 $61,484 3.14%$1,928 5.81%$3,572 $65,056 Above Market NFP 13 discusses the findings, recommendations and implementation plans. 4.1: Recommendation #1: Adjust Salt Lake City’s Market (Midpoint) Utilizing Benchmarked 50th Percentile as a Guide. Securing the benchmarked 50th Percentile as a guide, Salt Lake City’s market and midpoint can be adjusted to reflect the current market. The new benchmarked data suggests that many jobs are now slotted incorrectly in the current 2021 Salt Lake City General Employee Pay Plan (GEPP). Please see chart 4A. This was anticipated as aggressive wage inflation and market rates have increased as a rapid pace. The below chart reflects the new pay grades, market rates or midpoints. A premium of 2% was added to each “new market midpoint” to reflect the compensation philosophy of the City. Positions were slotted after careful review of the job descriptions and internal scope and worth of each position relative to the grade. Employee performance, tenure and seniority, promotions, demotions and if an employee was rehired was not factored into the job slotting and new midpoint evaluation. Midpoint differentials between grades averaged 5.16%. SLC Grade New Grade Job Title # of incumbents SLC Average pay SLC Median Pay Benchmarking Comparison‐Midpoint (50th Base) New Midpoint % Difference SLC Midpoint & Benchmarked Midpoint Difference in $‐SLC Midpoint & Benchmarked Midpoint Salt Lake City‐ Midpoint/Market 020X COLLECTIONS OFFICER 4 $48,173 $45,978 $40,413 32.47%$13,123 $53,536 019X 20 OFFICE FACILITATOR II (OFFICE MANAGER)30 $51,451 $51,334 $52,058 -1.34%-$696 $51,362 019X 20 SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES TECH 4 $49,457 $49,358 $52,847 $53,502 -2.81%-$1,485 $51,362 021X 21 HOUSING LOAN ADMIN 1 $54,475 $54,475 $56,112 $57,491 0.10%$54 $56,166 021X 21 SOCIAL SERVICE WORKER (CSW)5 $58,082 $58,698 $56,615 -0.79%-$449 $56,166 024X 22 HOUSING & REHAB LOAN OFFICER 1 $61,818 $61,818 $59,523 $61,112 9.30%$5,533 $65,056 018X 22 LEGAL SECRETARY III 3 $54,579 $57,200 $60,304 -18.47%-$11,137 $49,167 023X 23 PARALEGAL 6 $60,871 $60,746 $61,400 0.96%$591 $61,991 024X 23 WAREHOUSE SUPERVISOR 3 $63,412 $65,062 $61,484 5.81%$3,572 $65,056 026X 23 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 1 $71,739 $71,739 $61,777 16.15%$9,974 $71,751 026X 23 CITY PAYROLL ADMINISTRATOR 2 $63,492 $63,492 $63,530 $63,947 12.94%$8,221 $71,751 023X 23 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR 1 $62,608 $62,608 $63,599 -2.53%-$1,608 $61,991 024X 23 PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST I 2 $61,558 $61,558 $64,371 1.06%$685 $65,056 025X 24 HR RECRUITER 1 $65,000 $65,000 $65,284 4.61%$3,011 $68,295 021X 24 ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II 1 $56,160 $56,160 $65,574 -14.35%-$9,408 $56,166 026X 24 FORENSIC SCIENTIST II 4 $66,300 $66,227 $65,833 $66,979 8.08%$5,318 $71,151 025X 24 GRAPHIC DESIGN SPECIALIST II 0 $68,286 $68,286 $65,972 3.52%$2,323 $68,295 030X 25 COLLECTIONS MANAGER 1 $82,930 $82,930 $67,499 29.29%$19,771 $87,270 021X 25 LAW OFFICE MANAGER 1 $63,690 $63,690 $68,177 $69,637 -17.62%-$12,011 $56,166 025X 25 NETWORK SUPPORT ADMINISTRATOR II 7 $62,139 $61,942 $69,140 $69,637 -1.22%-$845 $68,295 025X 26 BILLING OFFICE SUPERVISOR 1 $68,994 $68,994 $70,528 -3.17%-$2,233 $68,295 030X 26 GIS PROGRAMMER ANALYST II 4 $83,720 $83,990 $70,746 23.36%$16,524 $87,270 029X 26 SOCIAL WORK MANAGER 2 $84,198 $84,198 $71,820 $72,892 15.73%$11,298 $83,118 026X 26 LICENSED CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER (LCSW)1 $68,182 $68,182 $72,758 -1.38%-$1,007 $71,751 024X 27 RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST 1 $76,294 $76,294 $73,100 -11.00%-$8,044 $65,056 024X 27 MANAGEMENT ANALYST 3 $64,716 $65,062 $73,616 -11.63%-$8,560 $65,056 027X 27 LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST 1 $70,637 $70,637 $74,162 1.58%$1,175 $75,337 029X 27 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT III 1 $78,957 $78,957 $74,730 $75,551 11.22%$8,388 $83,118 026X 27 SAFETY COORDINATOR 3 $72,793 $72,446 $74,742 -4.00%-$2,991 $71,751 029X 28 CITY CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR 1 $78,957 $78,957 $76,422 8.76%$6,696 $83,118 028X 28 SENIOR CLAIMS ADJUSTER 1 $77,189 $77,189 $77,760 1.80%$1,403 $79,163 025X 28 FLEET MANAGEMENT SERVICE SUPERVISOR 6 $66,955 $67,621 $77,867 -12.29%-$9,572 $68,295 027X 28 ACCOUNTANT III 13 $74,800 $75,338 $78,324 $79,482 -3.81%-$2,987 $75,337 029X 28 COMPENSATION ANALYST 1 $83,117 $83,117 $79,247 4.88%$3,871 $83,118 NFP 14 Continued 4.2: Cost Recommendations Cost recommendations include bringing each FTE in each job to the published survey midpoints found below. Total cost equates to $1,061,850 or an average of $5,445 per employee. SLC Grade New Grade Job Title # of incumbents SLC Average pay SLC Median Pay Benchmarking Comparison‐Midpoint (50th Base) New Midpoint % Difference SLC Midpoint & Benchmarked Midpoint Difference in $‐SLC Midpoint & Benchmarked Midpoint Salt Lake City‐ Midpoint/Market 029X 29 CUSTOMER SERVICE MGR 0 $83,117 $83,117 $81,972 1.40%$1,146 $83,118 030X 29 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 6 $85,058 $87,277 $81,991 6.44%$5,279 $87,270 030X 29 HUMAN RESOURCES SUPERVISOR 3 $82,146 $82,909 $82,683 $84,169 5.55%$4,587 $87,270 028X 29 AUDITOR III 1 $71,261 $71,261 $83,430 -5.11%-$4,267 $79,163 027X 30 SR PURCHASING CONSULTANT 1 $73,840 $73,840 $86,051 -12.45%-$10,714 $75,337 030X 30 HR BUSINESS PARTNER II 6 $85,249 $85,197 $87,424 -0.18%-$154 $87,270 031X 30 ENGINEER IV 13 $87,213 $87,069 $87,930 4.24%$3,731 $91,661 026X 30 SENIOR LABORATORY CHEMIST 1 $73,320 $73,320 $88,507 -18.93%-$16,756 $71,751 031X 30 REAL PROPERTY MANAGER 1 $91,666 $91,666 $88,668 $89,741 3.38%$2,993 $91,661 030X 30 HRIS ANALYST 2 $89,471 $89,471 $89,310 -2.28%-$2,040 $87,270 032X 31 SOFTWARE SUPPORT ADMIN III 4 $96,294 $92,477 $90,857 5.91%$5,368 $96,225 029X 31 FINANCIAL ANALYST III 6 $76,610 $74,797 $93,112 $94,407 -10.73%-$9,994 $83,118 031X 31 NETWORK ENGINEER II 1 $91,666 $91,666 $93,698 -2.17%-$2,037 $91,661 033X 32 GEO INFO SYSTEMS (GIS) MGR 3 $90,771 $92,685 $96,658 4.54%$4,393 $101,051 025X 32 FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 5 $68,411 $68,286 $97,311 $98,924 -29.82%-$29,016 $68,295 031X 33 PAYROLL AND ACCOUNTING MANAGER 1 $87,360 $87,360 $99,488 -7.87%-$7,827 $91,661 031X 33 SAFETY PROGRAM MGR 2 $91,666 $91,666 $100,962 -9.21%-$9,301 $91,661 035X 33 INFO TECH PROJECT MANAGER 2 $100,589 $100,589 $101,602 $103,408 9.64%$9,795 $111,397 033X 33 SYSTEMS ENGINEER III 1 $97,760 $97,760 $102,235 -1.16%-$1,184 $101,051 029X 33 LABORATORY PROGRAM MANAGER 1 $83,949 $83,949 $102,615 $103,408 -19.00%-$19,497 $83,118 033X 24 SOFTWARE ENGINEER III 2 $97,448 $97,448 $104,073 -2.90%-$3,022 $101,051 031X 34 SOCIAL WORK DIRECTOR 1 $91,666 $91,666 $104,985 $107,173 -12.69%-$13,324 $91,661 036X 34 SOFTWARE ENGINEER DATABASE 2 $109,023 $109,023 $106,157 10.18%$10,804 $116,961 033X 35 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MNGR 1 $95,992 $95,992 $109,748 -7.92%-$8,697 $101,051 033X 35 NETWORK SYSTEMS ENGINEER III 3 $101,525 $101,483 $111,065 -9.02%-$10,014 $101,051 033X 35 SENIOR ARCHITECT (LICENSED)2 $99,757 $99,757 $111,304 $113,347 -9.21%-$10,253 $101,051 033X 35 CYBERSECURITY ENGINEER II 2 $98,488 $98,488 $112,382 -10.08%-$11,331 $101,051 035X 36 FINANCIAL MGR III 2 $111,405 $111,405 $115,424 -3.49%-$4,027 $111,397 035X 36 SR SOFTWARE ENGINEER 2 $108,753 $108,753 $116,508 $119,496 -4.39%-$5,111 $111,397 034X 36 RISK MANAGER 1 $102,357 $102,357 $119,526 -11.24%-$13,433 $106,093 *Additional review needed. SLC Grade New Grade Job Title # of incumbents SLC Average pay SLC Median Pay Benchmarking Comparison‐ Midpoint (50th Base) New Midpoint Estimated Cost to Market Midpoint of Published Survey Data 020X COLLECTIONS OFFICER 4 $48,173 $45,978 $40,413 019X 20 OFFICE FACILITATOR II (OFFICE MANAGER)30 $51,451 $51,334 $52,058 $65,015 019X 20 SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES TECH 4 $49,457 $49,358 $52,847 $53,502 $16,573 021X 21 HOUSING LOAN ADMIN 1 $54,475 $54,475 $56,112 $57,491 $3,016 021X 21 SOCIAL SERVICE WORKER (CSW)5 $58,082 $58,698 $56,615 N/A NFP 15 SLC Grade New Grade Job Title # of incumbents SLC Average pay SLC Median Pay Benchmarking Comparison‐ Midpoint (50th Base) New Midpoint Estimated Cost to Market Midpoint of Published Survey Data 021X 21 HOUSING LOAN ADMIN 1 $54,475 $54,475 $56,112 $57,491 $3,016 021X 21 SOCIAL SERVICE WORKER (CSW)5 $58,082 $58,698 $56,615 N/A 024X 22 HOUSING & REHAB LOAN OFFICER 1 $61,818 $61,818 $59,523 $61,112 N/A 018X 22 LEGAL SECRETARY III 3 $54,579 $57,200 $60,304 $11,735 023X 23 PARALEGAL 6 $60,871 $60,746 $61,400 $19,206 024X 23 WAREHOUSE SUPERVISOR 3 $63,412 $65,062 $61,484 N/A 026X 23 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 1 $71,739 $71,739 $61,777 N/A 026X 23 CITY PAYROLL ADMINISTRATOR 2 $63,492 $63,492 $63,530 $63,947 $911 023X 23 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR 1 $62,608 $62,608 $63,599 $1,339 024X 23 PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST I 2 $61,558 $61,558 $64,371 $4,780 025X 24 HR RECRUITER 1 $65,000 $65,000 $65,284 $1,979 021X 24 ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II 1 $56,160 $56,160 $65,574 $10,819 026X 24 FORENSIC SCIENTIST II 4 $66,300 $66,227 $65,833 $66,979 $3,007 025X 24 GRAPHIC DESIGN SPECIALIST II 0 $68,286 $68,286 $65,972 N/A 030X 25 COLLECTIONS MANAGER 1 $82,930 $82,930 $67,499 N/A 021X 25 LAW OFFICE MANAGER 1 $63,690 $63,690 $68,177 $69,637 $5,948 025X 25 NETWORK SUPPORT ADMINISTRATOR II 7 $62,139 $61,942 $69,140 $69,637 $53,865 025X 26 BILLING OFFICE SUPERVISOR 1 $68,994 $68,994 $70,528 $3,899 030X 26 GIS PROGRAMMER ANALYST II 4 $83,720 $83,990 $70,746 N/A 029X 26 SOCIAL WORK MANAGER 2 $84,198 $84,198 $71,820 $72,892 N/A 026X 26 LICENSED CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER (LCSW)1 $68,182 $68,182 $72,758 $4,710 024X 27 RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST 1 $76,294 $76,294 $73,100 N/A 024X 27 MANAGEMENT ANALYST 3 $64,716 $65,062 $73,616 $31,467 027X 27 LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST 1 $70,637 $70,637 $74,162 $4,915 029X 27 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT III 1 $78,957 $78,957 $74,730 $75,551 N/A 026X 27 SAFETY COORDINATOR 3 $72,793 $72,446 $74,742 $9,315 029X 28 CITY CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR 1 $78,957 $78,957 $76,422 $526 028X 28 SENIOR CLAIMS ADJUSTER 1 $77,189 $77,189 $77,760 $2,294 025X 28 FLEET MANAGEMENT SERVICE SUPERVISOR 6 $66,955 $67,621 $77,867 $71,170 027X 28 ACCOUNTANT III 13 $74,800 $75,338 $78,324 $79,482 $53,883 029X 28 COMPENSATION ANALYST 1 $83,117 $83,117 $79,247 N/A 029X 29 CUSTOMER SERVICE MGR 0 $83,117 $83,117 $81,972 N/A 030X 29 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 6 $85,058 $87,277 $81,991 N/A 030X 29 HUMAN RESOURCES SUPERVISOR 3 $82,146 $82,909 $82,683 $84,169 $3,782 028X 29 AUDITOR III 1 $71,261 $71,261 $83,430 $12,909 027X 30 SR PURCHASING CONSULTANT 1 $73,840 $73,840 $86,051 $15,901 030X 30 HR BUSINESS PARTNER II 6 $85,249 $85,197 $87,424 $27,267 031X 30 ENGINEER IV 13 $87,213 $87,069 $87,930 $34,743 026X 30 SENIOR LABORATORY CHEMIST 1 $73,320 $73,320 $88,507 $16,421 031X 30 REAL PROPERTY MANAGER 1 $91,666 $91,666 $88,668 $89,741 N/A 030X 30 HRIS ANALYST 2 $89,471 $89,471 $89,310 $540 NFP 16 4.3: Compensation and Classification System Administration The City’s compensation and classification system will need periodic maintenance to ensure competitiveness and desired market job. The recommendations provided to improve the competiveness of the classification and compensation structure were developed based on conditions at the time the data were collected. Without proper upkeep, the potential for recruitment and retention issues may increase as the compensation and classification system becomes dated and less competitive. RECOMMENDATION 1: Conduct compa-ratio and salary range penetration analysis. A common use for a compa-ratio is determining where an employee should fall on a standard pay range. Similar to Salt Lake City, organizations assign jobs to a pay grade that has a pre-defined minimum, maximum and midpoint. A commonly accepted range for compa-ratios is 80% to 120%, which in turn can be divided into five zones: 1. 80-87% 2. 88-95% 3. 96-103% 4. 104-111% 5. 112-120% Each one of these zones is associated with a pre-defined level of performance, with 100% representing fully competent performance in the job. The five compa-ratio zones range from the lowest level for new, inexperienced incumbents, or unsatisfactorily SLC Grade New Grade Job Title # of incumbents SLC Average pay SLC Median Pay Benchmarking Comparison‐ Midpoint (50th Base) New Midpoint Estimated Cost to Market Midpoint of Published Survey Data 032X 31 SOFTWARE SUPPORT ADMIN III 4 $96,294 $92,477 $90,857 $7,720 029X 31 FINANCIAL ANALYST III 6 $76,610 $74,797 $93,112 $94,407 $117,660 031X 31 NETWORK ENGINEER II 1 $91,666 $91,666 $93,698 $2,741 033X 32 GEO INFO SYSTEMS (GIS) MGR 3 $90,771 $92,685 $96,658 $18,718 025X 32 FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 5 $68,411 $68,286 $97,311 $98,924 $153,189 031X 33 PAYROLL AND ACCOUNTING MANAGER 1 $87,360 $87,360 $99,488 $16,048 031X 33 SAFETY PROGRAM MGR 2 $91,666 $91,666 $100,962 $23,485 035X 33 INFO TECH PROJECT MANAGER 2 $100,589 $100,589 $101,602 $103,408 $5,638 033X 33 SYSTEMS ENGINEER III 1 $97,760 $97,760 $102,235 $5,648 029X 33 LABORATORY PROGRAM MANAGER 1 $83,949 $83,949 $102,615 $103,408 $19,459 033X 24 SOFTWARE ENGINEER III 2 $97,448 $97,448 $104,073 $19,450 031X 34 SOCIAL WORK DIRECTOR 1 $91,666 $91,666 $104,985 $107,173 $15,508 036X 34 SOFTWARE ENGINEER DATABASE 2 $109,023 $109,023 $106,157 N/A 033X 35 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MNGR 1 $95,992 $95,992 $109,748 $17,355 033X 35 NETWORK SYSTEMS ENGINEER III 3 $101,525 $101,483 $111,065 $35,592 033X 35 SENIOR ARCHITECT (LICENSED)2 $99,757 $99,757 $111,304 $113,347 $27,181 033X 35 CYBERSECURITY ENGINEER II 2 $98,488 $98,488 $112,382 $29,718 035X 36 FINANCIAL MGR III 2 $111,405 $111,405 $115,424 $16,182 035X 36 SR SOFTWARE ENGINEER 2 $108,753 $108,753 $116,508 $119,496 $21,486 034X 36 RISK MANAGER 1 $102,357 $102,357 $119,526 $17,139 195 Grand Total: $1,061,850 A vg. Cost Per EE: $5,445 NFP 17 performing incumbents, through to the highest level reserved for those universally recognized as outstanding performers. A broad definition of each zone is  80-87% – new, inexperienced, or unsatisfactorily-performing incumbents.  88-95% – those gaining experience but not yet fully competent in the job.  96-103% – fully competent performers performing the job as defined.  104-111% – those consistently performing the job at a lever higher than what the job definition requires.  112-120% – those universally recognized as outstanding performers, both inside and outside the organization. Most of the time an employee’s progression through the pay range may be directly related to his or her performance. Comp-ratios can be an additional and valuable tool to gauge if a salary range is competitive. Low compa-ratios compared to the market might help identify inadequate pay as a contributing factor to high turnover, or to pinpoint jobs in which your institution is paying much higher salaries than are necessary. Salary range penetration tells you where a person’s salary specifically falls within a pay range. RECOMMENDATION 2: Conduct small-scale salary surveys as needed to assess the market competitiveness of hard-to-fill classifications and/or classifications with retention issues and make adjustments to pay grade assignments if necessary. While it is unlikely that the pay plan as a whole will need to be adjusted for several years, a small number of classifications’ pay grades may need to be reassigned more frequently. If one or more classifications are exhibiting high turnover or the City is having difficulty with recruitment, the City should collect salary range data from peer organizations to determine whether an adjustment is needed for the pay grade of the classification(s). If increasing a classification’s pay grade based on market data does not help with the recruitment and/or retention issues, it may be necessary for the City to offer incentives to attract employees to the job and/or to encourage employees to remain in the job. RECOMMENDATION 3: Conduct a comprehensive classification and compensation study every three to five years. Small-scale salary surveys can improve the market job of specific classifications, but it is recommended that a full classification and compensation study be conducted every three to five years to preserve both internal and external equity for the City. Changes to classification and compensation do occur, and while the increments of change may seem minor, they can compound over time. A failure to react to these changes quickly has the potential to place the City in a less than desirable job for recruiting and retaining quality employees. A compensation study is only as successful, and as applicable, as the accuracy of the data it generates. A customized, current total compensation survey that is tailored to the jobs and needs of the City may be necessary to add to the compensation benchmarking report may be necessary. As the job market continues to be aggressive with rampant wage inflation in many jobs in the Wasatch region, the market had been very volatile and moves very quickly. A customized survey can capture what public and some private industries are compensating their employees. While the previous two recommendations are intended to maintain the competitiveness of classifications over time and of the classification and compensation structure as a whole, it is also necessary to review and establish guidelines for determining equitable pay practices for employees. NFP 18 SUMMARY The recommendations in this chapter establish a total compensation system that would place the City at its desired market job. By increasing the City market and the entire pay plan and supportive administration practices, the City will have a responsive compensation and classification structure for years to come. While the upkeep of these recommended systems will require work, the City will find that having a competitive compensation and classification system that encourages strong recruitment and employee retention, and is well worth this commitment. Addenda- Salt Lake City Compensation Sheets Each Salt Lake City job benchmarked has a compensation sheet that summarizes the job’s market value to the benchmarking wage surveys that NFP utilized. Every compensation sheet has a summary of the weighted average and average total cash compensation of the 25th, 50th 75th base. We focus on the 50th Percentile and compare Salt Lake City’s medians of each job and the employees within the job. Above, Below and At Market are defined below: If Salt Lake City’s pay is at 98% or lower of the market rate, the job is below the market. If Salt Lake City’s pay is 102% or higher than the market rate the job is above the market. If Salt Lake City’s pay is 2%+/- of the market rate the job is within the market. All of the jobs benchmarked received enough data to provide sufficient results to draw conclusions. Reading the Compensation Sheet Weighted averages of all surveys SLC Position Information (title, # of positions, base pay, and total cash compensation) SLC Position Job Description Job description from the database Demographic data points that were studied TCC = Total Cash Compensation  If SLC’s pay is at 95% or lower of the market rate or midpoint of the benchmarking data that position is below the market.  If SLC’s pay is at 110% or higher of the market rate or midpoint of the benchmarking data that position is above the market.  If SLC’s pay is close to the market rate or midpoint of the benchmarking data within one standard deviation, the position is within the market Each survey utilized in the compensation analysis cuts of data in which the overall compensation for the position is calculated. Then, another weighted average is reflected between the two surveys for the final market data. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$58,133 $64,811 $71,674 $59,866 $66,906 $74,184 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$60,462 $67,403 $74,478 $62,264 $69,582 $77,086 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$65,580 $74,724 $84,105 $67,909 $75,215 $85,017 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$68,199 $77,605 $87,173 $70,621 $80,538 $90,687 Overall 100%$63,094 $71,136 $79,358 $65,165 $73,060 $81,744 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$71,700 $79,200 $87,700 $73,200 $81,600 $91,200 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$74,900 $82,700 $91,600 $76,500 $85,300 $95,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$69,700 $76,900 $85,200 $71,200 $79,300 $88,600 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$72,800 $80,400 $89,000 $74,300 $82,800 $92,500 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$71,400 $78,800 $87,300 $72,900 $81,200 $90,800 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$74,600 $82,400 $91,200 $76,200 $84,900 $94,900 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$69,400 $76,600 $84,800 $70,800 $78,900 $88,200 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$72,500 $80,000 $88,600 $74,000 $82,500 $92,200 Overall 100%$72,125 $79,625 $88,175 $73,638 $82,063 $91,713 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 25.0%$76,498 $83,833 $92,251 $77,445 $85,510 $95,578 Salt Lake Metro 25.0%$76,851 $84,220 $92,677 $77,802 $85,905 $96,018 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 25.0%$75,938 $82,592 $91,543 $77,926 $86,271 $94,874 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 25.0%$77,110 $86,148 $94,424 $77,879 $87,000 $94,791 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$76,599 $84,198 $92,724 $77,763 $86,172 $95,315 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$71,094 $78,336 $85,068 $72,522 $78,540 $85,068 Utah | All 50.0%$71,094 $78,336 $85,068 $72,522 $78,540 $85,068 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$71,094 $78,336 $85,068 $72,522 $78,540 $85,068 Survey Information CompData Accountant II (Senior) Prepares consolidated financial statements including balance sheets, profit, loss and subsidiary statements. Reviews and analyzes general ledger account balances. Verifies accuracy and makes recommendations for corrections. Prepares monthly reconciliations and balance sheets. May provide guidance to lower level employees. Bachelor's degree, thorough knowledge of accounting principles, and two years experience in general accounting. Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Summarize and prepare financial records and statements for external reporting. Utilize accounting principles to ensure compliance with regulatory reporting requirements. Maintain records of assets, liabilities, profit and loss, tax liability, or other financial activities within an organization. Seasoned professional in the job family. This is the level of full competence that all professionals are expected to achieve in the function. Manages program and project implementation and makes significant contributions to department goals and planning efforts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5‐7 years of related professional experience. Accountant ‐ Senior/Career Level Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Accountant III ‐ 001665 13 $74,800 $75,338 Maintains financial records and ensures that financial transactions are properly recorded. Ensures the accuracy of entries to ledger accounts and reconciles subsidiary ledger accounts to the general ledger. Prepares complex balance sheets, profit and loss statements and other financial reports. Analyzes current costs, revenues, financial commitments, and obligations incurred to predict future revenues and expenses. May supervise and guide lower‐level accountants. Requires a bachelor's degree. May require CPA certification. Typically reports to a supervisor or manager. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Typically requires 4 to 7 years of related experience. Incumbent performs general to highly complex professional accountant work assignments, including specialized or general analysis in one or more accounting functions, including: Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable, Payroll, Cost Accounting, Asset Management, Capital Expenditures or General Accounting. Reviews and analyzes journal vouchers, accounting classifications and other accounting/financial statements, records and reports. Prepares balance sheets, making adjustments and closing entries; prepares financial reports, statements, inventory, receipts and disbursements; computes and distributes labor, material and overhead costs; reviews, audits and maintains journal entries and accounting ledgers; reconciles and analyzes cost account ledgers. ACCOUNTANT III ‐ Performs accounting duties of a complex nature requiring advanced knowledge and competency in accounting principles and practices. Works with broad discretion as to work details on assignments of a varied, diverse and difficult nature. Requires four to eight years of related work experience. Incumbent exercises discretion and independent judgment to perform said duties. $70,728 $78,324 $86,331 $72,272 $79,959 $88,460 Accountant III Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Accountant Readies and maintains financial and business transactions, applying accounting principles, that include work that is analytical, evaluative, and advisory in nature and that requires an understanding of both accounting theory and practice. Utilizes knowledge of the fundamental doctrines, theories, principles, and terminology of accountancy, and often entails some understanding of such related fields as business law, statistics, and general management. Analyzes the effects of transactions upon account relationships. Evaluates alternative means of treating transactions. Plans the manner in which account structures should be developed or modified. Ensures the adequacy of the accounting system as the basis for reporting to management. Considers the need for new or changed controls. Projects accounting data to show the effects of proposed plans on capital investments, income, cash position, and overall financial condition. Interprets the meaning of accounting records, reports, and statements. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$50,251 $54,462 $58,504 $51,001 $55,287 $59,406 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$52,409 $56,840 $61,090 $53,192 $57,701 $62,033 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$54,070 $59,741 $65,212 $55,074 $60,846 $66,423 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$56,428 $62,390 $68,124 $57,476 $63,544 $69,389 Overall 100%$53,290 $58,358 $63,233 $54,186 $59,345 $64,313 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$56,000 $63,200 $71,800 $57,400 $65,200 $74,900 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$56,800 $64,200 $72,900 $58,300 $66,200 $76,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$51,600 $58,200 $66,200 $52,900 $60,100 $69,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$52,400 $59,100 $67,200 $53,800 $61,000 $70,200 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$55,700 $62,900 $71,500 $57,200 $64,900 $74,600 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$56,600 $63,900 $72,600 $58,100 $65,900 $75,800 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$51,400 $58,000 $65,900 $52,700 $59,800 $68,800 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$52,200 $58,900 $66,900 $53,500 $60,800 $69,900 Overall 100%$54,088 $61,050 $69,375 $55,488 $62,988 $72,425 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$60,982 $70,905 $81,796 $61,735 $72,419 $84,038 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$64,178 $74,621 $86,083 $64,970 $76,214 $88,442 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$62,580 $72,763 $83,940 $63,353 $74,317 $86,240 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 25.0%$60,690 $68,136 $71,910 $64,872 $69,666 $72,318 Utah | All 25.0%$60,690 $68,136 $71,910 $64,872 $69,666 $72,318 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 25.0%$60,180 $72,114 $72,420 $60,180 $72,114 $72,420 Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 25.0%$60,180 $72,114 $72,420 $60,180 $72,114 $72,420 SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$60,435 $70,125 $72,165 $62,526 $70,890 $72,369 Survey Information CompData Executive Assistant Assists executive in staff capacity by handling a wide variety of situations involving administrative functions of the office. Manages executive's calendar, meetings, travel, correspondence, and budget. Develops and prepares presentations and reports. Advises others of the executive's views on policies or issues, using judgment and discretion. Bachelor's degree preferred and five years experience. Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Supervise clerical staff. Coordinates space and office organization, and special projects. Conduct research, prepare correspondence, expense and statistical reporting. Schedule travel, appointments and meetings. Screen phone calls, emails, mail and visitors; route and resolve information requests. Fully competent at performing support tasks and responsibilities in functional area. May provide direction to lower level support employees. Receives general supervision. Typically requires: High School diploma or GED, at least 2 years of related experience, knowledge of company and department procedures, tact in communications, proficiency with related systems. Executive Assistant ‐ Skilled Administrative Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Administrative Secretary II ‐ 002424 1 $56,160 $56,160 Provides administrative support to an individual, team, department or group in an organization. Collects, reviews and analyzes data and prepares reports, charts, budgets, and other presentation materials utilizing word processing, spreadsheet, or specialized software. Prepares and distributes reports or other communications on a regular schedule. Maintains files, databases, and archives of relevant records. Screens calls and responds to or routes routine inquiries from external or internal sources with appropriate correspondence or other messaging. Schedules and coordinates meetings, travel, and other group activities. May manage expense reporting, invoicing, office supply inventory, or other routine processes. Requires a high school diploma. Typically reports to a supervisor or manager. Independently performs a wide range of complex duties under general guidance from supervisors. Has gained full proficiency in a broad range of activities related to the job. Typically requires 5‐7 years of related experience. Under the general administrative direction of the department director and his/her executive staff acts as confidential and private secretary, performing a variety of complex clerical and interactions with the public. Graduation from high school or the equivalent and six years paid progressively more responsible office experience performing similar duties to those required in this position. Experience should include office management, public or community relations and executive secretary duties. Up to four years of post‐secondary academic training may be substituted for required experience on a year‐for‐year basis. $57,598 $65,574 $72,178 $58,888 $66,885 $73,837 Administrative Assistant IV Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Administrative Secretary Keeps official corporation records and initiates administrative policies determined by or in conjunction with other officials. Prepares memorandums outlining and explaining administrative procedures and policies to supervisory workers. Schedules conferences, appointments, meetings, and travel arrangements for senior staff. Leads preparation of records, such as notices, minutes, and resolutions for stockholders' and directors' meetings. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$62,589 $68,260 $73,887 $64,622 $70,502 $76,349 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$65,099 $70,966 $76,747 $67,214 $73,297 $79,305 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$71,677 $79,445 $87,114 $74,416 $82,472 $90,443 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$74,481 $82,428 $90,231 $77,327 $85,568 $93,679 Overall 100%$68,462 $75,275 $81,995 $70,895 $77,960 $84,944 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$75,400 $84,000 $91,800 $78,100 $87,600 $96,800 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$80,900 $90,200 $98,500 $83,800 $94,000 $103,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$68,300 $76,200 $83,200 $70,800 $79,400 $87,800 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$73,400 $81,700 $89,300 $76,000 $85,200 $94,200 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$75,200 $83,700 $91,500 $77,800 $87,300 $96,500 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$80,700 $89,900 $98,200 $83,600 $93,700 $103,600 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$68,100 $75,900 $83,000 $70,600 $79,200 $87,500 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$73,100 $81,500 $89,000 $75,700 $85,000 $93,900 Overall 100%$74,388 $82,888 $90,563 $77,050 $86,425 $95,525 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$86,035 $91,917 $99,552 $86,035 $93,267 $101,982 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$86,432 $92,341 $100,012 $86,432 $93,698 $102,452 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$86,234 $92,129 $99,782 $86,234 $93,483 $102,217 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Acts as a liaison for audits with internal departments as well as outside auditors. Evaluate and document existing or proposed procedures and controls. Provide management with recommendations for policy, procedure and practice improvements. Conduct operational, compliance, financial and SOX audits within an organization. JOB FAMILY: Audit; LEVEL: P3: Senior/Career Level Professional; CAREER LEVEL DEFINITION: Seasoned professional in the job family. This is the level of full competence that all professionals are expected to achieve in the function. Manages program and project implementation and makes significant contributions to department goals and planning efforts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5‐7 years of related professional experience. Internal Auditor Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Auditor III ‐ 001684 1 $71,261 $71,261 Audits complex accounting and financial data of various departments within an organization to ensure accuracy and compliance with government guidelines and laws. Identifies and analyzes improper accounting or documentation within the organization. Researches identified issues thoroughly and makes recommendations to improve policies or procedures accordingly. Works with outside auditors to help reconcile discrepancies or support the external auditing function. Requires a bachelor's degree of accounting. Typically reports to a manager or head of unit/department. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Typically requires 4 to 7 years of related experience. Incumbent performs professional Internal Auditor assignments, including performing detailed financial and accounting auditing to determine the reliability and effectiveness of financial and control systems. Conducts audits of contracts, grants and/or operations; reviews organization structure, controls, policies and procedures; determines the nature and extent of auditing required; adjusts or extends audit programs where necessary; analyzes functions and provides appraisals of internal control structure of functions or systems. Investigates irregularities and recommended corrective measures. Prepares and reviews audit documentation to ensure adherence to standards, uniformity of procedures and adequacy of audit. At the highest level, examines records, documents, methods, policies, costs and other factors. Coordinates the preparation of reports summarizing audit results. Makes recommendations and reviews audit findings with managers. Provides work leadership to lower level auditing staff on complex audits. May review the progress and work of subordinates (or support staff) for adequacy, method, and procedures. May act as Audit Leader for an audit team assigned to specific functional or operational areas. Plans methods to be followed in the conduct of audits, recommends activities to be examined, the extent of examination and establishes completion schedules. AUDITOR III ‐ Performs financial and accounting auditing duties of a complex nature requiring advanced knowledge and experience in auditing principles and practices. Works with broad discretion as to work details on assignments of a varied and difficult nature. Requires 5‐8 years of related work experience. Certified Internal Auditor (CIA) or Certified Public Accountant (CPA) certification may be required at this level. $76,361 $83,430 $90,780 $78,059 $85,956 $94,229 Auditor Internal Controls III Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Internal Auditor Analyzes and evaluates the effectiveness of controls, accuracy of financial records, and efficiency of operations for management in an organization. Studies accounting and statistical records of departments, and interviews individuals to ensure recording of transactions and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Determines the efficiency and protective value of accounting systems. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$59,895 $65,038 $70,085 $62,109 $67,468 $72,739 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$63,111 $68,497 $73,724 $65,444 $71,055 $76,515 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$68,657 $75,825 $82,808 $71,645 $79,115 $86,412 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$72,250 $79,613 $86,724 $75,395 $83,068 $90,499 Overall 100%$65,978 $72,243 $78,335 $68,648 $75,177 $81,541 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$60,600 $69,200 $78,400 $61,700 $71,600 $80,700 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$62,100 $71,100 $80,400 $63,300 $73,500 $82,800 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$54,100 $61,800 $70,000 $55,000 $64,000 $72,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$55,500 $63,400 $71,800 $56,500 $65,600 $73,900 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$60,300 $69,000 $78,000 $61,400 $71,300 $80,300 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$61,900 $70,800 $80,100 $63,000 $73,200 $82,400 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$53,800 $61,600 $69,700 $54,800 $63,700 $71,700 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$55,200 $63,200 $71,500 $56,200 $65,300 $73,600 Overall 100%$57,938 $66,263 $74,988 $58,988 $68,525 $77,175 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$61,096 $69,213 $79,746 $61,096 $69,743 $80,325 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%$64,299 $72,840 $83,924 $64,299 $73,398 $84,535 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 33.0%$74,520 $77,185 $80,196 $74,520 $77,185 $80,196 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$66,615 $73,077 $81,315 $66,615 $73,442 $81,714 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Billing and Payables Supervisor $80,143 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Billing Manager Manages the billing team to ensure that clients are invoiced promptly for services provided and to resolve customer issues leading to timely collection of receivables. Collaborates with the Accounts Receivable and Billing team to coordinate and execute billing of clients. Researches and resolves inquiries involving billing discrepancies, account status, adjustments, etc. Oversees the billing process, including timeliness of billing, collections, and systems management. Economic Research Institute $63,510 $70,528 $78,213 $64,750 $72,381 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Supervise the day‐to‐day billing operations activities, and assist in hiring, training, and reviewing performance of staff. Review, evaluate, and resolve billing process issues and revenue collections. Maintain preparation of statements and bills, resolve discrepancies in accounting records. Ensure compliance with company policies and procedures, as well as state and federal regulations. Billing; Supervises and monitors the day‐to‐day activities of a group of (typically non‐ exempt) staff. Organizes work and provides direct supervision to subordinates. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 3+ years of related professional experience. Billing Management ‐ Supervisor Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Billing Office Supervisor ‐ 001937 1 $68,994 $68,994 Responsible for activities and operations in the accounts payable function for the organization. Analyzes invoices and expense reports for accuracy and eligibility for payment. Ensures timely payments of vendor invoices and expense vouchers and maintains accurate financial records and control reports. Prepares accounts payable register and related reports in a timely manner. May require a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a manager. Supervises a small group of para‐professional staff in an organization characterized by highly transactional or repetitive processes. Contributes to the development of processes and procedures. Thorough knowledge of functional area under supervision. Typically requires 3 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. Under the general guidance of the Public Utilities Finance Administrator, this position manages the Public Utilities billing system. Responsible for development and implementation of system upgrades, new developments, and modifications to the system. Manages all related accounts receivable documents, agreements, records, resolving problems, and acts as liaison for industrial customers billing issues. Educates employees across the City on the proper use and access to the billing Information. Supervises the staff in the Billing Office. Two year degree in Accounting, Business, or related area, & 5 years experience, including 1 year supervising a similar function in public or private sector. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$75,390 $82,476 $89,528 $77,902 $85,251 $92,577 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$80,814 $88,417 $95,952 $83,507 $91,391 $99,220 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$88,708 $98,275 $107,639 $92,105 $102,029 $111,761 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$95,077 $105,253 $115,143 $98,718 $109,273 $119,552 Overall 100%$84,997 $93,605 $102,066 $88,058 $96,986 $105,778 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$71,300 $79,500 $88,600 $73,200 $82,100 $92,000 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$68,900 $76,800 $85,700 $70,700 $79,400 $89,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$63,100 $70,400 $78,500 $64,800 $72,700 $81,500 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$61,100 $68,100 $75,900 $62,700 $70,300 $78,800 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$71,000 $79,100 $88,200 $72,900 $81,800 $91,600 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$68,600 $76,500 $85,300 $70,400 $79,100 $88,600 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$62,900 $70,100 $78,200 $64,500 $72,400 $81,200 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$60,800 $67,800 $75,600 $62,400 $70,000 $78,500 Overall 100%$65,963 $73,538 $82,000 $67,700 $75,975 $85,150 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 25.0%$68,578 $76,633 $84,972 $70,222 $78,565 $88,208 Salt Lake Metro 25.0%$70,098 $78,333 $86,856 $71,779 $80,307 $90,164 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 25.0%$72,293 $79,771 $88,805 $75,764 $83,153 $93,158 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 25.0%$68,003 $79,291 $91,010 $68,003 $80,162 $91,010 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$69,743 $78,507 $87,911 $71,442 $80,547 $90,635 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$75,888 $82,314 $88,944 $75,888 $82,314 $88,944 Utah | All 50.0%$75,888 $82,314 $88,944 $75,888 $82,314 $88,944 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0% Overall 100%$75,888 $82,314 $88,944 $75,888 $82,314 $88,944 Survey Information CompData Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Analyze business processes and write system process specific cations to be used. Work with clients to determine their business needs to transform them into information technology system requirements. Determine solutions to business software/hardware system problems. Business Analysis; Fully applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency solving problems of moderate complexity. Contributes to completion of projects and programs in area of expertise. May interface with internal and/or external customers and provide guidance to non‐exempts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Business Systems Analyst ‐ Intermediate Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Business Systems Analyst II ‐ 002338 6 $85,058 $87,277 Reviews, analyzes, and evaluates user needs to create systems solutions that support overall business strategies. Documents system requirements, defines scope and objectives, and creates system specifications that drive system development and implementation. Incumbents function as a liaison between IT and users and have both business and technical expertise. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or its equivalent. Typically reports to a manager. Gains exposure to some of the complex tasks within the job function. Occasionally directed in several aspects of the work. Typically requires 2 to 4 years of related experience. The Business Systems Analyst works with the assigned department/division director and the Business Systems Analyst Team Lead to manage and support the work groups operational needs. Incumbent works directly with the operations teams providing system administration, technical support, business analysis, and reporting. Provides analysis in technology, management issues, communications, equipment evaluation and procurement, and other areas as required. Serves as project manager and liaison between IMS Division staff, project vendors, and personnel in the city departments. Supports the assigned work groups by analyzing business system needs, mobile communications and applications, and participates in department procedures and policy implementations. Serves in a “Train the Trainer” role supporting learning and consistent business uses of service applications. Provides website content management. Graduation from an accredited four‐year college or university with a degree in computer science, public administration or other closely related field or related field plus work experience, as stipulated for each level noted above. Education and work experience may be substituted one for the other on a year‐for‐year basis. $75,754 $81,991 $90,230 $75,772 $83,955 $92,627 Business Systems Analyst II Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Business Systems Analyst Analyzes business processes, functions, and procedures to determine the most effective business systems software to meet the needs of the organization. Establishes systems specifications and objectives, based on business requirements and cost effectiveness, and provides recommendations to management personnel. Collaborates with others in systems development and design, including software programming and table, report, and panel design. Develops test plans and coordinates and performs software testing. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$60,746 $66,643 $72,673 $62,569 $68,668 $74,916 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$63,205 $69,383 $75,677 $65,102 $71,490 $78,012 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$69,261 $77,508 $85,873 $71,720 $80,252 $88,922 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$72,118 $80,708 $89,387 $74,678 $83,565 $92,561 Overall 100%$66,333 $73,561 $80,903 $68,517 $75,994 $83,603 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$77,000 $86,500 $97,300 $79,200 $89,400 $102,400 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$76,900 $86,400 $97,200 $79,100 $89,300 $102,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$71,700 $80,500 $90,700 $73,700 $83,300 $95,400 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$71,600 $80,400 $90,600 $73,700 $83,200 $95,300 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$76,700 $86,100 $96,900 $78,800 $89,000 $101,900 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$76,600 $86,000 $96,800 $78,700 $88,900 $101,800 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$71,400 $80,200 $90,300 $73,400 $82,900 $95,000 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$71,300 $80,100 $90,200 $73,300 $82,800 $94,900 Overall 100%$74,150 $83,275 $93,750 $76,238 $86,100 $98,625 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 25.0%$61,091 $70,778 $79,413 $61,168 $71,003 $79,961 Salt Lake Metro 25.0%$61,493 $71,245 $79,937 $61,571 $71,471 $80,488 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 25.0%$67,480 $74,351 $80,282 $68,307 $75,571 $81,298 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 25.0%$65,460 $73,352 $76,114 $65,982 $74,364 $77,142 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$63,881 $72,432 $78,937 $64,257 $73,102 $79,722 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Review and negotiate contractual details, including specifications, price, date of delivery and contractual provisions. Prepares proposal for major contracts. JOB FAMILY: Contract Law / Administration; CAREER LEVEL: Intermediate Professional: Exhibits technical and operational proficiency in the primary duties of the job family. Plays a key role in Implementing projects and programs in the function. Acts as a resource to managers and employees in the organization. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Contracts Administrator, Legal ‐ Intermediate Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information CITY CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR 1 $78,957 $78,957 Develops, prepares, and administers contracts, bids, and proposals that meet specifications and comply with all policies and regulations. Supports or participates in contract negotiations with suppliers, partners, or customers. Reviews contract terms to identify any potential risk or compliance issues. Examines supporting materials and agreement documents related to bids or contracts and provides guidance. Acts as liaison between the organization and subcontractors to implement the contracts. Maintains contract records used to ensure compliance with reporting and regulatory requirements. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or equivalent. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Typically requires 4 ‐7 years of related experience. Under the general direction of the Chief Procurement Officer, establishes and monitors contract process standards and procedures for the purchase of products and services and is the lead position of the Contracts Section. Prepares and edits bids, proposals and contracts and reviews and edits bids, proposals and contracts developed by Contracts staff. Provides counsel, conducts staff performance evaluations and monitors Contract Section staff assignments. This is a professional‐level position that requires expertise in contract development, contract procedures, contract format and design, and Request for Proposal (RFP) and bid development. This position also requires a high level of independent judgment, analytical skill and decision‐making, as well as excellent verbal and written communication skills. Bachelor's degree in Business Administration, Contract Management, Purchasing, Accounting, Finance or a related field, and at least four (4) years’ full‐time paid experience in contract development or contract administration, one year of which should include supervision and/or staff lead responsibilities. Education and experience may be substituted one for the other on a year‐for‐year basis. $68,121 $76,422 $84,530 $69,671 $78,399 $87,317 Contracts Administrator III Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Contract Administrator Administers activities concerned with contracts for purchase or sale of equipment, materials, products, or services. Negotiates contract with customer or bidder. Examines performance requirements, delivery schedules, and estimates of costs of material, equipment, and production to ensure completeness and accuracy. Reviews bids from other firms for conformity to contract requirements and determines acceptable bids. Provides bids, process specifications, test and progress reports, and other exhibits that may be required. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$47,544 $51,550 $55,402 $48,278 $52,357 $56,285 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$49,400 $53,587 $57,612 $50,163 $54,426 $58,531 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$51,240 $56,642 $61,861 $52,223 $57,724 $63,047 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$53,263 $58,907 $64,343 $54,284 $60,033 $65,577 Overall 100%$50,362 $55,172 $59,805 $51,237 $56,135 $60,860 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$68,600 $76,200 $85,600 $71,600 $79,900 $91,400 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$68,800 $76,500 $85,900 $71,800 $80,200 $91,700 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$64,500 $71,600 $80,500 $67,300 $75,100 $85,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$64,700 $71,900 $80,800 $67,500 $75,300 $86,200 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$68,300 $75,900 $85,300 $71,300 $79,500 $91,000 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$68,600 $76,200 $85,600 $71,500 $79,800 $91,300 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$64,200 $71,300 $80,100 $67,000 $74,700 $85,500 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$64,400 $71,600 $80,400 $67,200 $75,000 $85,800 Overall 100%$66,513 $73,900 $83,025 $69,400 $77,438 $88,600 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 100.0%$55,002 $61,517 $73,991 $55,358 $61,517 $74,976 Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$55,002 $61,517 $73,991 $55,358 $61,517 $74,976 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 25.0%$52,938 $54,876 $60,180 $52,938 $56,406 $60,180 Utah | All 25.0%$52,326 $54,672 $58,854 $52,326 $55,386 $58,854 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 25.0%$55,488 $57,222 $61,506 $56,610 $57,222 $61,506 Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 25.0%$55,488 $57,222 $61,506 $56,610 $57,222 $61,506 SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$40,826 $42,279 $45,467 $41,387 $42,458 $45,467 Survey Information CompData Payroll Coordinator Enters, corrects, verifies, and transmits payroll information in the payroll system. Sorts and distributes payroll checks to supervisors and processes manual checks when required. Maintains records with accrual information related to vacation, basic, and supplemental time, employee accounts receivables, and all payroll related files. Enters employee data information in the system and maintains employee files. Answers calls/correspondence related to payroll checks. Reports monthly wage and labor statistics. Ensures that all court orders for garnishments are communicated to employees and information is relayed to payroll system. Associate's degree required and two years experience. Payroll Administrator III $74,812 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Payroll Accountant Readies and maintains various accounting papers, schedules, statements, and records; aids the Payroll staff in calculating accurate wages and depositing the amounts in employees' bank accounts or issuing checks. Handles the processing of payroll information associated with newly hired employees, terminated employees, wage verification, withholding allowances, pay rate changes, status changes, benefit deductions, payroll garnishments, and direct deposits. Economic Research Institute $57,292 $63,530 $72,274 $58,665 $65,030 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Process payroll, including updating employee numbers, hours, garnishments, etc. Prepare payroll related reports. Record, maintain and update payroll procedures. Maintain employee records for new hires, pay changes, and terminations. Ensure organizational compliance with federal and local regulations, auditing, and non‐discrimination laws. Payroll; Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency in the primary duties of the job family. Plays a key role in Implementing projects and programs in the function. Acts as a resource to managers and employees in the organization. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Payroll Administrator Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information CITY PAYROLL ADMINISTRATOR 2 $63,492 $63,492 Responsible for the accurate preparation, documentation, distribution and reconciliation of payroll and the administration of the payroll system. Reviews the computation of pay and associated deductions for accuracy. Maintains up‐to‐date knowledge of city, state, provincial, local, and federal legislation affecting payroll; understands and follows applicable provisions. Prepares required tax filings and other reporting. May coordinate payroll processing with an outside service provider. Responds to and resolves any inquiries regarding paychecks or payroll reporting. Ensures payroll issues are escalated and resolved promptly. Requires an associate degree or equivalent. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Typically requires 4 ‐7 years of related experience. Under the direction of the City Controller, incumbent is responsible for the administration, development, implementation and process of Salt Lake City Corporation’s payroll system. Coordinates directly with Human Resources (HR) and Information Services (IMS) on all payroll issues. The position requires compliance with city, state and federal payroll policies, rules and regulations, and plays an active role in implementing and monitoring the payroll system. Bachelor’s degree in accounting or a closely related field plus four years general accounting experience with two of the four years in payroll operations and computerized payroll systems experience. Experience may be substituted for education on a year‐for‐year basis. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$60,670 $65,825 $70,834 $63,756 $69,207 $74,522 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$63,820 $69,242 $74,488 $67,067 $72,800 $78,366 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$69,656 $76,706 $83,536 $73,812 $81,270 $88,521 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$73,256 $80,614 $87,714 $77,627 $85,411 $92,948 Overall 100%$66,851 $73,097 $79,143 $70,566 $77,172 $83,589 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 16.6%$53,800 $61,800 $69,800 $58,100 $67,200 $76,600 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$55,600 $63,800 $72,200 $60,000 $69,400 $79,200 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$53,400 $61,200 $69,200 $57,600 $66,600 $75,900 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 16.6%$53,600 $61,500 $69,500 $57,800 $66,900 $76,300 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$55,400 $63,600 $71,900 $59,700 $69,100 $78,800 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$53,100 $61,000 $68,900 $57,300 $66,300 $75,600 Overall 100%$53,933 $61,901 $69,969 $58,183 $67,313 $76,758 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Collections Supervisor $80,174 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Collections Manager Manages and coordinates activities of workers engaged in conducting credit investigations and collecting delinquent accounts of customers of commercial establishment, department store, bank, or similar establishment. Assigns subordinates to supervise workers investigating and verifying financial status and reputation of prospective customers applying for credit, preparing documents to substantiate findings, and recommending rejection or approval of applications. Determines responsibility for collecting on worthless checks and delinquent bills to specific supervisors. Economic Research Institute $60,392 $67,499 $74,556 $64,374 $72,243 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Collections Manager 1 $82,930 $82,930 Supervises the day‐to‐day process and operations involved with collections on overdue/delinquent accounts. Reviews and develops policies and procedures and ensures compliance. Initiates demand letters, outbound calls, and handles escalated calls. Monitors collections activities for quality. Ensures that production targets are achieved. May require a bachelor's degree. Supervises a small group of para‐professional staff in an organization characterized by highly transactional or repetitive processes. Contributes to the development of processes and procedures. Typically requires 3 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. Thorough knowledge of functional area under supervision. Under the direction of the Finance Revenue & Audit Manager, manages the City Collections Unit responsible for collection of fines, fees, penalties, surcharges, restitution originating from the City Justice Courts and other City department past due accounts . This is a professional position requiring independent judgment, a thorough knowledge of the City Codes and State Statutes. Incumbent must have a broad understanding of municipal violations, fee/fine structures, collections, dispute resolution programs, and associated legal protocols. Bachelor’s degree in Accounting, Public Administration, Business Administration or a closely related field and four to six years experience in collections, including work in a supervisory or lead capacity. Education and related experience may be substituted on a year‐for‐year basis. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$30,357 $33,385 $36,029 $31,515 $34,656 $37,416 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$31,608 $34,667 $37,324 $32,814 $35,988 $38,761 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$31,049 $34,335 $37,188 $32,306 $35,716 $38,693 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$32,310 $35,623 $38,490 $33,618 $37,055 $40,048 Overall 100%$31,331 $34,503 $37,258 $32,563 $35,854 $38,730 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$39,300 $43,900 $49,200 $40,800 $45,900 $52,000 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$40,400 $45,100 $50,600 $42,000 $47,200 $53,400 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$35,800 $40,000 $44,900 $37,200 $41,900 $47,400 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$36,800 $41,200 $46,200 $38,300 $43,100 $48,700 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$39,100 $43,700 $49,000 $40,700 $45,700 $51,700 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$40,200 $45,000 $50,400 $41,800 $47,000 $53,200 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$35,700 $39,900 $44,700 $37,100 $41,700 $47,200 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$36,700 $41,000 $46,000 $38,100 $42,900 $48,500 Overall 100%$38,000 $42,475 $47,625 $39,500 $44,425 $50,263 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$40,060 $43,497 $47,072 $40,060 $43,497 $47,114 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$41,469 $45,028 $48,729 $41,469 $45,028 $48,773 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$40,764 $44,262 $47,900 $40,764 $44,262 $47,944 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Monitor and maintain assigned accounts through follow up and possibly implement alternative payment options. Make collection and billing calls to reduce the lost assets of a company and delinquent payments. Credit and Collection; Lead level position performs technical or specialized tasks. Works under minimal supervision and provides leadership to teams. Typically requires: Associate's degree, professional certification(s), or license; 8+ years of related experience. Collections Specialist Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Collections Officer 4 $48,173 $45,978 Responsible for initiating calls to complex and difficult delinquent customers by phone, mail or personal visit to collect payments and settle accounts. Follows‐up on delinquent accounts, updates and maintains accurate financial records including accounting, receivable, and credit records. Requires a high school diploma or equivalent. Typically reports to a supervisor. Works independently within established procedures associated with the specific job function. Has gained proficiency in multiple competencies relevant to the job. Typically requires 3‐5 years of related experience, or may need 2 years experience with additional specialized training and/or certification. Reporting to and working under the general direction of the Collections Manager, incumbent performs office work in support of collection of past due accounts, including court fines, delinquent payment plans and other bad debt accounts. Ensures compliance with State Statutes and City Codes and is responsible for maximizing the collection, tracking, and reporting of associated revenues. Duties are performed with considerable independence within established policies and procedures and require the exercise of judgment in resolving known and potential problems. A minimum of 50% of the time in this position involves public contact performing difficult collections work for which tact, patience, understanding and skill in handling volatile situations are required. This position may require a shift which extends beyond normal working hours. High school diploma or equivalent plus six months paid customer service work experience. $36,698 $40,413 $44,261 $37,609 $41,514 $45,645 Collections Representative III Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Collections Associate Arranges , and relays communication between creditors and customers, facilitates the collection of outstanding payments and negotiation of debt payments. Assesses, monitors and inspects debtor accounts ensuring consistency in repayment, and noting delayed or overdue payments. Documents and updates debtor account records according to payment schedules and plans, accommodates for larger and off schedule payments. Locates and tracks elusive debtors and defaulters utilizing publicly available agencies and credit bureaus. Maintains knowledge on compliance requirements from public agencies and legislation. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$62,405 $68,160 $73,942 $64,185 $70,127 $76,106 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$64,944 $70,968 $76,999 $66,797 $73,016 $79,252 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$71,579 $79,622 $87,619 $73,984 $82,290 $90,562 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$74,537 $82,905 $91,194 $77,041 $85,682 $94,258 Overall 100%$68,366 $75,414 $82,439 $70,502 $77,779 $85,045 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$85,400 $94,200 $102,600 $87,800 $97,200 $107,400 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$86,400 $95,300 $103,800 $88,900 $98,300 $108,700 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$77,200 $85,200 $92,800 $79,400 $87,900 $97,200 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$78,100 $86,200 $93,900 $80,400 $88,900 $98,300 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$85,100 $93,900 $102,300 $87,500 $96,900 $107,100 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$86,100 $95,000 $103,500 $88,600 $98,000 $108,400 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$77,000 $84,900 $92,500 $79,200 $87,600 $96,900 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$77,900 $85,900 $93,600 $80,100 $88,700 $98,000 Overall 100%$81,650 $90,075 $98,125 $83,988 $92,938 $102,750 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 0.0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Salt Lake Metro 0.0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 50.0%$68,394 $77,177 $85,342 $71,235 $78,068 $86,743 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 50.0%$65,695 $67,325 $76,538 $65,695 $67,325 $76,538 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$67,044 $72,251 $80,940 $68,465 $72,697 $81,640 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Compensation Analyst III $89,812 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Compensation Analyst Assesses and performs analysis on collected wage data, and prepares wage and salary data to facilitate compensation and management functions of organization. Converses with management to determine type, scope, and purpose of analyses. Examines and evaluates executive and non‐executive positions. Responsibilities are of a professional level, and require understanding of both compensation theory and practice. Economic Research Institute $72,354 $79,247 $87,168 $74,318 $81,138 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Determine competitiveness both internally and externally. Design and prepare ad hoc compensation and budget related reports for management. Assist in preparation of merit increase and incentive programs and budgeting. Price new jobs utilizing salary surveys or slotting. Review and monitor employee pay and recommend reviews if necessary. Analyze country specific data and relevant market trends, develop salary structures and market pricing recommendations. Monitor cost differentials, taxes for equalization and country specific incentives and variable pay. Ensure company compliance with country specific regulations and laws, including reporting requirements. Identify relevant market data and trends regarding executive compensation and present recommendations. Write job descriptions and maintain database of all job descriptions. Intermediate Professional; Exhibits technical and operational proficiency in the primary duties of the job family. Plays a key role in Implementing projects and programs in the function. Acts as a resource to managers and employees in the organization. Compensation Analyst ‐ Intermediate Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Compensation Analyst 1 $83,117 $83,117 Analyzes, designs, and administers employer compensation programs, including base pay, long and short‐term incentives, spot bonuses, commissions, and stock that align with company objectives for recruiting, retention, and employee engagement. Designs and communicates pay structures, grades, compensation budgets, and guidelines. Advises managers on making effective pay decisions that support employee engagement and comply with compensation policy and budgetary guidelines. Evaluates jobs and develops and maintains job descriptions and job architecture. Participates in compensation surveys, conducts research and analysis on market competitiveness, pay equity, and compensation trends. Requires a bachelor's degree or equivalent. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Typically requires 4 ‐7 years of related experience. Working under general guidance, incumbent serves as an analyst in areas of classification, compensation, and labor market analysis necessary to develop and implement effective compensation strategies following industry standards and best practices. This role requires an understanding of how classification and compensation decisions impact recruitment and selection, performance management, succession planning, and career development. Performs market analysis to evaluate current pay rates for competitiveness. Evaluates jobs by documenting responsibilities and requirements in job descriptions. Contributes organizational data to and analyzes results of compensation surveys. Assists and participates in annual salary administration programs, including creation and maintenance of pay structures and development of incentive or salary increase budgets. Bachelor's degree in human resources, business, public administration, or a related field, and four to five years of professional level human resources experience, including experience conducting job analysis; developing, writing and/or revising job & class descriptions; and conducting salary studies. Education may be substituted on a year‐for‐year basis for up to a maximum of four years of related experience. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: City Market Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$71,803 $78,992 $86,284 $77,006 $84,772 $92,678 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$75,501 $82,993 $90,563 $80,972 $89,067 $97,274 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$84,855 $94,593 $104,379 $91,889 $102,416 $113,031 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$89,082 $99,158 $109,249 $96,466 $107,358 $118,306 Overall 100%$80,310 $88,934 $97,619 $86,583 $95,903 $105,322 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$79,400 $90,900 $106,600 $83,100 $97,500 $116,100 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$83,100 $95,200 $111,600 $87,000 $102,000 $121,500 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$73,800 $84,500 $99,000 $77,200 $90,500 $107,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$77,200 $88,400 $103,700 $80,800 $94,700 $112,900 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$79,100 $90,500 $106,200 $82,800 $97,000 $115,600 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$82,800 $94,800 $111,100 $86,600 $101,600 $121,000 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$73,400 $84,100 $98,600 $76,900 $90,100 $107,400 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$76,900 $88,000 $103,200 $80,500 $94,300 $112,400 Overall 100%$78,213 $89,550 $105,000 $81,863 $95,963 $114,350 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$61,396 $69,206 $76,976 $62,758 $69,854 $79,191 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$64,697 $72,927 $81,114 $66,131 $73,610 $83,448 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$63,047 $71,067 $79,045 $64,445 $71,732 $81,320 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$71,910 $78,336 $100,878 $73,950 $91,392 $100,878 Utah | All 50.0%$71,910 $78,336 $100,878 $73,950 $91,392 $100,878 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$71,910 $78,336 $100,878 $73,950 $91,392 $100,878 Manages a team or unit of customer service representatives and ensures service levels are met or exceeded. Establishes efficient and balanced workflows that maximize efficiency and produce high levels of service quality and customer satisfaction. Monitors and measures service metrics and utilize to develop standards, improvements, or changes to process. Makes recommendations for changes to products or services based on customer feedback and requests. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or equivalent. Typically reports to a director. Manages subordinate staff in the day‐to‐day performance of their jobs. True first level manager. Ensures that project/department milestones/goals are met and adhering to approved budgets. Has full authority for personnel actions. Typically requires 5 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. 1 ‐ 3 years supervisory experience may be required. Extensive knowledge of the function and department processes. Under the direction of the Public Utilities Finance Administrator, manages the City’s Utility Customer Service division. This division is responsible for the collection, customer service, account management of residential and commercial water, sewer, stormwater, garbage, street lighting, and bus pass services. This is a professional position requiring independent judgment, a thorough knowledge of the City Codes and State Statutes. Incumbent must have a broad understanding of municipal ordinances, water exchange contracts, special service agreements, new service agreements, collections, dispute resolution, and associated legal protocols. Bachelor's degree in business administration or closely related field and four to six years related experience, two of which must have been as supervisor. Education and experience may be substituted one for the other on a year for year basis, except for the supervisory experience. $73,370 $81,972 $95,635 $76,710 $88,747 $100,467 Customer Service Manager Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Customer Service Manager Manages by directing and coordinating subordinate customer service staff in connection with any product or service offered. Manages workers who investigate complaints, such as those concerning rates or service. Analyzes reports of findings and recommends response to complaints, considering nature and complexity of complaints, requirements, and actions of subordinates to ensure settlements are made correctly. Studies schedules and estimates time, cost, and labor estimates for services, and/or completion of job assignments. Economic Research Institute Survey Information CompData Customer Service Manager Plans and coordinates customer order processing, directs inside sales, and maintains effective customer relations. Manages order‐processing activities to ensure that customer product and repair orders will be filled accurately and in a timely manner. Implements procedures and provides guidance to ensure that customer inquiries and complaints are handled and processed in accordance with the organization's objectives. Develops and implements operating systems and procedures for the department. Develops and maintains department budget. Bachelor's degree required and five years experience. Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale First point of customer contact for general inquiries like pricing, products, scheduling etc. Ensures delivery of excellent customer service through fast and accurate processing of orders, communication, and coordinating with other departments to resolve inquires. Builds and maintain business relationship with clients by providing prompt and accurate service so as to promote customer loyalty. Customer Service; Manages Professional employees and/or Supervisors. Has budget, deadline responsibility in the area managed. Typically responsible for the day‐to‐day management of one functional area. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5+ years of related professional experience, 1+ years supervisory experience. Customer Service Representative ‐ 1st Level Manager Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Customer Service Manager ‐ 001935 0 $83,117 $83,117 Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$59,671 $65,323 $70,988 $62,277 $68,213 $74,181 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$62,744 $68,687 $74,618 $65,485 $71,726 $77,975 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$67,059 $74,787 $82,549 $70,564 $78,683 $86,863 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$70,507 $78,581 $86,645 $74,193 $82,675 $91,174 Overall 100%$64,995 $71,845 $78,700 $68,130 $75,324 $82,548 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$57,900 $67,400 $78,500 $59,700 $70,500 $83,400 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$59,600 $69,300 $80,800 $61,500 $72,500 $85,800 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$53,400 $62,100 $72,300 $55,100 $65,000 $76,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$54,900 $63,900 $74,400 $56,600 $66,900 $79,100 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$57,700 $67,100 $78,200 $59,500 $70,200 $83,000 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$59,300 $69,000 $80,400 $61,200 $72,200 $85,400 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$53,200 $61,900 $72,000 $54,800 $64,700 $76,500 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$54,700 $63,600 $74,100 $56,400 $66,600 $78,700 Overall 100%$56,338 $65,538 $76,338 $58,100 $68,575 $81,100 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$45,975 $51,871 $59,549 $46,042 $52,775 $60,181 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$48,446 $54,660 $62,751 $48,518 $55,612 $63,416 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$47,211 $53,266 $61,150 $47,280 $54,194 $61,799 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$55,896 $63,750 $75,072 $55,896 $63,750 $80,172 Utah | All 50.0%$55,896 $63,750 $75,072 $55,896 $63,750 $80,172 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$55,896 $63,750 $75,072 $55,896 $63,750 $80,172 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale First point of customer contact for general inquiries like pricing, products, scheduling etc. Ensures delivery of excellent customer service through fast and accurate processing of orders, communication, and coordinating with other departments to resolve inquires. Builds and maintain business relationship with clients by providing prompt and accurate service so as to promote customer loyalty. Customer Service; Supervises and monitors the day‐to‐day activities of a group of (typically non‐exempt) staff. Organizes work and provides direct supervision to subordinates. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 3+ years of related professional experience. Customer Service Representative ‐ Supervisor Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Customer Service Supervisor 1 $62,608 $62,608 Supervises a staff of customer service representatives that respond to requests from customers by phone, e‐mail, or chat. Manages the daily workload to ensure required service volume and quality levels are attained. Trains and coaches staff in standard policies, procedures, and best practices. Identifies opportunities for operational improvements and implements solutions. Monitors and evaluate staff performance. Responds to escalated issues to facilitate solutions. May provide direct customer support for complicated or critical issues. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or equivalent. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Supervises a small group of para‐professional staff in an organization characterized by highly transactional or repetitive processes. Contributes to the development of processes and procedures. Typically requires 3 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. Thorough knowledge of functional area under supervision. Reporting to the Customer Service Manager of Public Utilities, supervises the Customer Service division, directing the activities of representatives, cashiers, and investigators/collectors. This is a supervisory position requiring first level managerial, administrative, public relations and collections skills. Two year degree in Business Administration or related field, plus three years' paid experience in customer related duties. Must have at least one‐year experience as acting supervisor in customer relations or collections work. Education and work experience may be substituted on a year for year basis. $56,110 $63,599 $72,815 $57,351 $65,461 $76,405 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Customer Service Supervisor Supervises and aids with planning, directing, and coordinating activities of customer service workers engaged in ensuring customer satisfaction through processing orders and coordination with other departments or functions as required. Advises workers on investigating complaints or concerns, such as those concerning rates or service in connection with any product or service offered. Economic Research Institute Survey Information CompData Customer Service Supervisor Supervises customer service staff that responds to customer's questions, complaints, inquiries, and orders for the organization's products and/or services. Prepares policies and procedures for customer service area. Interprets and clarifies policies and procedures for customers and customer service representatives. Traces lost shipments and resolves difficult and complex problems. Approves special prices, quotes, bid allowances, and adjustments. Bachelor's degree required and three years experience. Customer Service Supervisor Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$94,529 $103,532 $112,402 $97,970 $107,330 $116,566 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$101,277 $110,815 $120,144 $104,963 $114,880 $124,595 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$114,181 $125,874 $137,514 $118,826 $130,984 $143,108 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$122,007 $134,187 $146,206 $126,970 $139,634 $152,154 Overall 100%$107,999 $118,602 $129,067 $112,182 $123,207 $134,106 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 16.6%$105,500 $119,300 $131,800 $108,000 $122,700 $137,500 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$107,500 $121,500 $134,200 $110,000 $125,000 $140,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$99,900 $112,900 $124,800 $102,300 $116,200 $130,200 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 16.6%$105,100 $118,800 $131,200 $107,600 $122,200 $136,900 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$107,000 $120,900 $133,600 $109,500 $124,400 $139,400 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$99,500 $112,400 $124,200 $101,800 $115,700 $129,600 Overall 100%$103,667 $117,163 $129,447 $106,107 $120,549 $135,058 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$89,467 $101,770 $115,341 $89,467 $102,499 $115,927 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%$90,298 $102,716 $116,412 $90,298 $103,452 $117,005 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 33.0%$96,436 $99,615 $109,655 $96,680 $102,020 $111,033 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$92,049 $101,380 $113,829 $92,130 $102,665 $114,679 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Use technical skills to respond to threats and emergency security incidents in a timely manner. Lead team in engineering solutions or improvements to prevent malicious activity. Use strong knowledge of computers and electronics to monitor and analyze data from various security systems. Effectively communicate security information to fellow analysts and customers. IT Security; Fully applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency solving problems of moderate complexity. Contributes to completion of projects and programs in area of expertise. May interface with internal and/or external customers and provide guidance to non‐exempts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Cyber Security Engineer ‐ Intermediate Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Cybersecrity Engineer II 2 $98,488 $98,488 Plans and designs security solutions and capabilities that enable the organization to identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover from cyber threats and vulnerabilities. Defines and develops security requirements using risk assessments, threat modeling, testing, and analysis of existing systems. Develops security integration plans to protect existing infrastructure and to incorporate future solutions. Designs action plans for policy creation and governance, system hardening, monitoring, incident response, disaster recovery, and emerging cybersecurity threats. Utilizes a variety of security information and event management (SEIM), data loss prevention (DLP), intrusion prevention systems (IPS), and other tools in designs. Partners with stakeholders to encourage the adoption of security‐compatible software designs and best practices. Keeps abreast of the latest intelligence from law enforcement and other sources of cyber threat information. Typically requires a bachelor's degree in computer science or engineering or equivalent. May require security certifications such as Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) or Certified Information Security Manager (CISM). Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Typically requires 4 ‐7 years of related experience. Under the guidance of the CISO/Director ITS and the Cybersecurity Engineering Manager, the Cybersecurity Engineer role is to ensure the security, stability and integrity of voice, data, video, and wireless network services. Planning, designing, developing, and implementing network wide security, local area networks (LANs) and wide area networks (WANs) across the City infrastructure. The Cybersecurity Engineer will participate with the installation, monitoring, maintenance, support, and optimization of all, network hardware, software, and communication links. These individuals will also analyze and resolve cybersecurity threats including vulnerability and penetration testing, network hardware and software problems in a timely and accurate fashion and provide training and mentoring where required to the Cybersecurity and Network Engineering teams. Cybersecurity Engineer II ‐ Graduation from a four‐year accredited college with a Bachelor’s degree in computer science or related field plus 6‐8 years related experience in the administration of a network with multiple LANs and WANs. Equivalent combination of education and experience substituted on a year‐for‐year basis. Possession of one (or more) of the following certifications may be required: Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP), Cisco Certified Network Professional (CCNP) with emphasis in security, route and switching or collaboration or CompTIA Security+. $101,238 $112,382 $124,114 $103,473 $115,474 $127,947 Cyber Security Architect II Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Cyber Security Engineer Plans, develops, and implements proven high‐tech solutions to increase security and defend against hacking, malware and ransomware, insider threats, and other types of cybercrimes. Oversees monitoring of computer networks, identifies security issues, and anticipates security breaches. Executes the installation and maintenance of security programs, plans, and software, including firewalls and data encryption programs. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$69,448 $76,296 $83,225 $70,835 $77,836 $84,928 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$72,015 $79,150 $86,341 $73,453 $80,748 $88,108 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$80,837 $90,150 $99,473 $82,709 $92,232 $101,777 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$83,865 $93,503 $103,111 $85,808 $95,663 $105,499 Overall 100%$76,541 $84,775 $93,038 $78,201 $86,620 $95,078 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$93,300 $104,600 $117,300 $94,600 $106,900 $121,900 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$94,900 $106,300 $119,200 $96,200 $108,600 $123,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$87,500 $98,000 $109,900 $88,600 $100,100 $114,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$88,900 $99,600 $111,700 $90,100 $101,800 $116,100 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$92,900 $104,200 $116,800 $94,200 $106,400 $121,400 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$94,500 $105,900 $118,700 $95,700 $108,200 $123,400 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$87,100 $97,600 $109,400 $88,300 $99,700 $113,800 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$88,500 $99,200 $111,200 $89,700 $101,400 $115,600 Overall 100%$90,950 $101,925 $114,275 $92,175 $104,138 $118,800 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$70,224 $76,305 $84,263 $70,238 $76,397 $85,204 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$71,671 $77,877 $86,000 $71,685 $77,971 $86,960 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$70,947 $77,091 $85,131 $70,961 $77,184 $86,082 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Gathers information to prepare and present reports on project topics. Manages and directs staff at project site. Performs engineering duties; plan, design and oversee the construction and maintenance of buildings, bridges, and other structures. Researches and analyzes maps, blueprints, photos, charts, and other data to plan projects. Civil; Fully applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency solving problems of moderate complexity. Contributes to completion of projects and programs in area of expertise. May interface with internal and/or external customers and provide guidance to non‐exempts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Civil Engineer ‐ Intermediate Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Engineer IV 13 $87,212.80 $87,068.80 Designs and supervises construction projects such as airports, bridges, channels, dams, railroads, or roads. Reviews designs, tests and assesses materials, and performs necessary data collection and calculations in areas such as traffic forecasting, soil capacity, groundwater analysis, and structure design. Responsibilities also include estimating costs, estimating personnel and material needs, preparing proposals, and establishing completion dates. May also assist in inspecting aging infrastructure or overseeing improvement projects. Requires a bachelor's degree in engineering. May require a Professional Engineer License (PE). Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Typically requires 4 ‐7 years of related experience. As a registered professional engineer, serves as project engineer on City projects, and independently evaluates, selects and applies standard engineering techniques, procedures and criteria in making substantial adaptations and modifications. This is a responsible position in planning, design, construction or related engineering work and may require supervising engineers and other subordinate staff. Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering or related engineering equivalent from a fully accredited college or university and four years paid work experience in civil engineering or related field. $79,479 $87,930 $97,481 $80,446 $89,314 $99,987 Civil Engineer III Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Civil Engineer Plans, designs, and oversees civil engineering projects, such as airports, bridges, buildings, channels, dams, harbors, irrigation systems, pipelines, power plants, railroads, roads, sewage systems, tunnels, and water supply. Analyzes reports, maps, drawings, blueprints, tests, and aerial photographs on soil composition, terrain, hydrological characteristics, and other topographical and geologic data to plan and design project. Calculates cost and determines feasibility of project based on analysis of collected data, applying knowledge and techniques of engineering, and advanced mathematics. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$63,352 $69,079 $74,771 $65,071 $70,974 $76,854 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$64,932 $70,842 $76,750 $66,693 $72,785 $78,888 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$71,885 $79,801 $87,639 $74,200 $82,363 $90,461 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$73,750 $81,995 $90,193 $76,125 $84,627 $93,097 Overall 100%$68,480 $75,429 $82,338 $70,522 $77,687 $84,825 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 16.6%$73,800 $84,500 $95,800 $75,600 $87,500 $100,300 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$75,300 $86,300 $97,800 $77,200 $89,300 $102,400 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$70,200 $80,400 $91,200 $72,000 $83,200 $95,500 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 16.6%$71,200 $81,600 $92,500 $73,000 $84,400 $96,800 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$72,700 $83,300 $94,400 $74,500 $86,200 $98,800 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$67,800 $77,600 $88,000 $69,400 $80,300 $92,100 Overall 100%$71,546 $81,954 $92,910 $73,322 $84,809 $97,259 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$78,154 $87,399 $94,201 $78,206 $88,021 $96,539 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%No Data Available $99,298 No Data Available No Data Available $99,780 No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 33.0%No Data Available $82,693 No Data Available No Data Available $82,693 No Data Available Overall 100%$78,154 $89,892 $94,201 $78,206 $90,261 $96,539 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$84,354 $109,650 $113,016 $84,354 $112,710 $113,016 Utah | All 50.0%$84,354 $109,650 $113,016 $84,354 $112,710 $113,016 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$84,354 $109,650 $113,016 $84,354 $112,710 $113,016 Survey Information CompData Maintenance Supervisor II (Senior) Provides direction for employees responsible for the upkeep of buildings and grounds, the repair and maintenance of equipment and machinery, and modifications to the structure or layout of the facility. Works with vendors and monitors inventory of supplies. Organizes work, estimates worker‐hour requirements, and delegates work to employees in maintenance department. Initiates or recommends personnel actions and administers organization's policy. High school education or equivalent required and five years experience. Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Develop policies and procedures for the use of supplies and facilities. Manage facilities staff to deliver maintenance and operations services. Manage facilities budget and project planning tasks. Hire and direct contracted service providers associated with facility maintenance and operations. Facilities Management; Supervises and monitors the day‐to‐day activities of a group of (typically non‐exempt) staff. Organizes work and provides direct supervision to subordinates. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 3+ years of related professional experience. Facilities Management ‐ Supervisor Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Facility Maintenance Supervisor ‐ 000864 5 $68,411 $68,286 Supervises and coordinates the general maintenance of buildings, equipment, and/or machinery. Oversees staff that performs masonry, painting, electrical, carpentry, tool‐making, and/or machine shop work. Estimates hours needed to complete tasks, prepares work schedules, assigns work, and inspects completed projects to ensure work meets quality standards. Requires a high school diploma. May require certain certifications in the field. Typically reports to a manager. Supervises a small group of para‐professional staff in an organization characterized by highly transactional or repetitive processes. Contributes to the development of processes and procedures. Typically requires 3 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. Thorough knowledge of functional area under supervision. Under the direction of a Senior Facilities Maintenance Supervisor, manages the day‐to‐day work of employees in a specific craft or trade in new construction, repair, remodeling and/or ongoing maintenance of City‐owned facilities and structures. This is a supervisory position requiring extensive, advanced knowledge in a particular craft or trade as well as an in‐depth understanding of the work environment. Six years increasingly responsible work experience and training in maintenance related field. Up to two years of relevant education may be substituted for up to two years of experience. Journey‐level certification and proficiency in trade required. $75,633 $89,231 $95,616 $76,601 $91,367 $97,910 General Maintenance Supervisor Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Maintenance Supervisor Supervises and coordinates activities of skilled trades workers engaged in maintaining and repairing equipment, electrical, plumbing, ventilation, structures, utility systems, buildings, and grounds. Evaluates problematic systems or facilities and determines the installation or repair services that need to be performed. Develops and organizes work schedules and assigns work activities to subordinates. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$64,532 $70,807 $77,155 $67,032 $73,581 $80,222 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$67,114 $73,588 $80,090 $69,714 $76,471 $83,274 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$74,341 $82,923 $91,541 $77,711 $86,671 $95,690 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$77,213 $85,971 $94,726 $80,712 $89,857 $99,019 Overall 100%$70,800 $78,322 $85,878 $73,792 $81,645 $89,551 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$79,900 $87,700 $96,600 $82,300 $90,800 $101,500 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$81,900 $89,900 $99,000 $84,400 $93,100 $104,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$75,400 $82,700 $91,100 $77,600 $85,700 $95,700 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$77,300 $84,800 $93,400 $79,600 $87,800 $98,100 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$79,700 $87,400 $96,300 $82,000 $90,600 $101,100 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$81,700 $89,700 $98,700 $84,100 $92,800 $103,700 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$75,100 $82,500 $90,800 $77,400 $85,400 $95,400 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$77,000 $84,600 $93,100 $79,300 $87,600 $97,800 Overall 100%$78,500 $86,163 $94,875 $80,838 $89,225 $99,663 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$110,094 $118,615 $127,067 $115,141 $124,422 $134,901 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$111,792 $120,443 $129,026 $116,918 $126,342 $136,981 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$110,943 $119,529 $128,047 $116,030 $125,382 $135,941 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$78,846 $88,434 $95,064 $78,846 $90,372 $99,654 Utah | All 50.0%$78,846 $88,434 $95,064 $78,846 $90,372 $99,654 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$78,846 $88,434 $95,064 $78,846 $90,372 $99,654 Survey Information CompData Financial Analyst II (Senior) Performs a broad range of planning and analysis. Monitors actual results of financial data against plans, forecasts, and budgets, determines trends, and explains financial results. Prepares detailed reports and presentations for review by all levels of management. Consolidates a wide range of operating and financial projections for the development of short‐term and long‐term business plans. Bachelor's degree in accounting or finance required and three years experience. Financial Analyst III $106,202 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Financial Analyst Accountant Analyzes statistics and utilizes principles of finance and accounting to analyze past and present financial operations and estimate future revenues and expenditures. Studies records of present and past operations, trends, costs, estimated and realized revenues, administrative commitments, and obligations incurred. Communicates with all levels of management, and advises them regarding matters such as effective use of resources and return on investments scenarios. Economic Research Institute $84,772 $93,112 $100,966 $87,376 $96,656 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Review forecasts from other departments and create bridge plans. Supervise and communicate ad‐hoc analyses for special projects and executive requests. Create and present financial plans and overviews. Direct forecasting and goal‐setting efforts for financial plans. Oversee and contribute to monthly, quarterly and annual budget preparation and evaluation. Seasoned professional in the job family. This is the level of full competence that all professionals are expected to achieve in the function. Manages program and project implementation and makes significant contributions to department goals and planning efforts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5‐7 years of related professional experience. Financial Analysis Management ‐ Senior/Career Level Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information FINANCIAL ANALYST III ‐ 001670 6 $76,610 $74,797 Responsible for the preparation, coordination, and documentation of financial analysis projects such as financial and expense performance, rate of return, depreciation, working capital, and investments. Provides analysis for forward‐looking financial and business‐related projects. Prepares forecasts and analysis of trends in manufacturing, sales, finance, general business conditions, and other related areas. Identifies trends and developments in competitive environments and presents findings to senior management. Creates and analyzes monthly, quarterly, and annual reports and ensures financial information has been recorded accurately. May conduct special financial and business related studies and cooperates with other departments in the preparation of analyses. Requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a supervisor or manager. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Typically requires 4 to 7 years of related experience. Incumbent performs professional Financial Analyst assignments, including special studies and surveys to summarize and analyze complex financial actions and prepare recommendations for policy, procedure, control or action. Provides interpretation and application of department or division‐level financial policies, governmental legislation, accounting theory or customer financial regulations which may require knowledge of financial principles, practices and application. Evaluates financial reports, plans, capital expenditures, billing/assessments, revenue management, operating records and financial statements. Directs and/or assists in the preparation of special studies, reports, analyses and recommendations in areas such as budgets, forecasts, financial systems/plans, capital improvement planning, internal controls, legislative requirements, statistical reports and business forecasts for management use. Coordinates with all levels of management to gather, analyze, summarize, and prepare recommendations regarding one or more of the following: financial plans, budgetary controls, acquisition activity, trended future requirements, operating forecasts and similar complex financial matters. FINANCIAL ANALYST III ‐ Develops, interprets and implements highly complex financial/accounting concepts and advanced techniques for financial planning and control. Provides specialized technical analysis to determine present and future financial performance. Directs the development and implementation of new concepts and techniques for financial information analysis. Requires five to eight years of related work experience. A Master’s degree level of education or certification may be required at this level. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$82,975 $91,426 $99,992 $87,820 $96,809 $105,945 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$87,132 $95,885 $104,729 $92,219 $101,531 $110,964 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$99,950 $111,245 $122,727 $106,506 $118,527 $130,778 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$104,686 $116,313 $128,095 $111,552 $123,927 $136,498 Overall 100%$93,686 $103,717 $113,886 $99,524 $110,199 $121,046 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$93,500 $105,500 $118,800 $98,100 $111,600 $128,900 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$97,100 $109,500 $123,400 $101,900 $115,900 $133,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$91,100 $102,700 $115,700 $95,500 $108,700 $125,600 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$94,600 $106,700 $120,200 $99,200 $112,900 $130,400 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$93,100 $105,000 $118,300 $97,700 $111,100 $128,400 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$96,700 $109,000 $122,800 $101,400 $115,400 $133,300 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$90,700 $102,300 $115,200 $95,100 $108,200 $125,000 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$94,200 $106,200 $119,700 $98,800 $112,400 $129,800 Overall 100%$93,875 $105,863 $119,263 $98,463 $112,025 $129,413 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 25.0%$133,795 $152,675 $171,273 $136,845 $162,190 $184,270 Salt Lake Metro 25.0%$136,379 $155,623 $174,581 $139,488 $165,323 $187,829 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 25.0%$127,647 $146,813 $160,169 $135,264 $155,824 $171,998 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 25.0%$101,250 $126,384 $142,057 $105,942 $131,625 $151,882 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$124,768 $145,374 $162,020 $129,385 $153,741 $173,995 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 25.0%$103,122 $108,426 $128,724 $105,060 $115,872 $130,968 Utah | All 25.0%$103,122 $108,426 $128,724 $105,060 $115,872 $130,968 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 25.0%$104,142 $105,060 $130,968 $104,142 $105,060 $130,968 Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 25.0%$104,142 $105,060 $130,968 $104,142 $105,060 $130,968 SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$103,632 $106,743 $129,846 $104,601 $110,466 $130,968 Survey Information CompData Financial Accounting Manager $138,855 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Accounting Manager Supervises, coordinates, documents, and analyzes information affecting financial and accounting programs of public, industrial, and/or financial organizations. Manages professional level accounting functions and the preparation of reports including earnings, profits/losses, cash balances, and cost accounting. Confirms accuracy of operating and financial reports. Advises upper management regarding matters, such as effective use of resources and methods, for preventing capital being frozen. Interprets accounts and records to upper management. Includes managers whose staffs may consist of a mix of professional, paraprofessional, and/or clerical accounting personnel; excludes managers whose staffs consist of 100 percent nonexempt accounting personnel. Economic Research Institute $103,990 $115,424 $131,254 $107,993 $121,608 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Assist in the development and implementation of policies and procedures relating to financial management, budget and accounting. Provide financial analysis statements including monthly balance sheets, income statements, cash flow statements, and actual to budget and variance analysis. Manage the daily activities of the accounting department. Collect and provide information for audit inquiries and give assistance to auditors. Oversee the posting and maintenance of general ledger accounts, payroll transactions, accounts payable and general ledger adjustments. Gives direction to 1st Level Managers and high‐level Professionals. May manage day‐to‐day operations of multiple functional areas. Directs and oversees implementation of large programs and projects. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree (Master's preferred), 7+ years of related professional experience, 3+ years managing specific area. Accounting Management ‐ 2nd Level Manager Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information FINANCIAL MGR III ‐ 002272 2 $111,405 $111,405 Manages various accounting functions including ledger maintenance, accounts payable, accounts receivable, revenue and asset accounting, as well as associated analysis and reporting. Evaluates and makes improvements to accounting processes while ensuring that practices comply with organization accounting policies and applicable laws and regulations. Leads and directs accounting professional and support staff, including subordinate supervisors. Requires a bachelor's degree. May require CPA certification. Typically reports to a director or head of a unit/department. Manages subordinate staff in the day‐to‐day performance of their jobs. True first level manager. Ensures that project/department milestones/goals are met and adhering to approved budgets. Has full authority for personnel actions. Extensive knowledge of department processes. Typically requires 5 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. 1 to 3 years supervisory experience may be required. Under direction of a Chief or Department Director, incumbent directs and administers all finance and accounting systems, reporting and financial programs, including budget preparation, financial analysis and cost accounting for a department. Major duties and responsibilities may also include oversight and coordination of other administrative functions such as: grants & contract administration; inventory & asset management; auditing; purchasing; oversight of payroll; and, other administrative activities. This is a senior management position requiring critical decision‐making skills and responsibilities necessary to inform, advise and assist executive leaders and elected officials with policy and financial decision making. FINANCIAL MANAGER III – Incumbents at this level manage the financial program for a large department including programs with the greatest financial complexity and a variety of fund types. Typically supervises other professional finance staff. Requires eight to ten years of increasingly responsible experience in a high‐level administration position, as well as two (2) years of experience in a supervisory capacity. A Master’s degree or professional certification (e.g. Certified Public Accountant) may be required at this level. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$68,442 $75,058 $81,737 $70,153 $76,956 $83,834 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$70,648 $77,522 $84,445 $72,414 $79,482 $86,611 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$78,691 $87,710 $96,736 $80,996 $90,272 $99,569 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$81,290 $90,624 $99,935 $83,670 $93,270 $102,862 Overall 100%$74,768 $82,729 $90,713 $76,808 $84,995 $93,219 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 16.7%$62,200 $69,000 $74,300 $62,600 $69,100 $74,800 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.7%$62,900 $69,800 $75,200 $63,400 $70,000 $75,700 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.7%$60,200 $66,700 $71,900 $60,600 $66,900 $72,400 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 16.7%$61,900 $68,700 $74,000 $62,300 $68,800 $74,500 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.7%$62,700 $69,500 $74,900 $63,100 $69,700 $75,400 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.7%$59,900 $66,400 $71,600 $60,300 $66,600 $72,000 Overall 100%$61,757 $68,487 $73,797 $62,174 $68,654 $74,282 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$75,224 $82,272 $89,429 $76,011 $82,924 $90,089 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$75,647 $82,502 $89,679 $76,223 $83,156 $90,341 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$75,436 $82,387 $89,554 $76,117 $83,040 $90,215 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Diesel Mechanic Supervisor $85,905 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Fleet Supervisor Supervises activities of fleet of vehicles required for the operations of an organization. Recommends vehicles for transfer or replacement and inspects new vehicles. Suggests changes, purchases, and divestitures of equipment. Economic Research Institute $70,653 $77,867 $84,688 $71,700 $78,896 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Examine cost effectiveness, equipment and worker performance, and adherence to regulations. Supervise parts procurement for repairs and warranty recovery, as well as confirming repair schedules with vendors. Review order and production schedules to prioritize duties and shipping dates. Direct staff in daily activities of fleet management operations. JOB FAMILY: Fleet; LEVEL: MS; CAREER LEVEL: Supervisor; CAREER LEVEL DEFINITION: Supervises and monitors the day‐to‐day activities of a group of (typically non‐exempt) staff. Organizes work and provides direct supervision to subordinates. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 3+ years of related professional experience. Fleet Management Supervisor Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information FLEET MANAGEMENT SERVICE SUPERVISOR ‐ 000868 6 $66,955 $67,621 Oversees day to day operations of a diesel maintenance shop. Supervises, trains, and coordinates work of mechanics and technicians. Maintains inventory of replacement parts, tools, and equipment required for operations. Ensures preventive maintenance and repairs meet all quality and safety standards. Knowledge of DOT rules and regulations. Experienced in heavy diesel engine diagnosis and repairs. Requires a high school diploma or equivalent. Requires Class A and/or B CDL license. Typically reports to a supervisor or manager. Responsible for the efficient day to day operation of a major section within the Airport or City Fleet Management Divisions. Reports directly to the assigned Fleet Operations Manager. This is highly skilled supervisory work with technical responsibilities. Six years’ experience as a fleet equipment mechanic, two of which must have been in a lead capacity. Requirement for experience in repairing light or heavy equipment will be as specified by the division. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$56,257 $61,176 $66,004 $57,325 $62,352 $67,293 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$57,119 $62,171 $67,112 $58,203 $63,367 $68,423 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$62,676 $69,407 $76,061 $64,110 $70,989 $77,801 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$63,710 $70,577 $77,312 $65,167 $72,186 $79,081 Overall 100%$59,941 $65,833 $71,622 $61,201 $67,224 $73,150 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available No Data Available $73,150 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Forensic Science Technician Investigates crimes by collecting and analyzing physical evidence. Applies scientific principles to analysis, identification, and classification of devices, chemical and physical substances, materials, liquids, or other physical evidence related to criminology, law enforcement, or investigative work. Searches for, secures, photographs, and preserves evidence. Performs variety of analytical examinations, utilizing chemistry, physics, mechanics, and other sciences. Economic Research Institute $59,941 $65,833 $71,622 $61,201 $67,224 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale No Data Available Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information FORENSIC SCIENTIST II ‐ 001974 4 $66,300 $66,227 Working under the general supervision of a Crime Lab Supervisor, incumbent conducts the full range of forensic examinations and scientific analysis of crime scene evidence, including various materials and substances, to include: drugs body tissues and fluids, including saliva, blood, hair, oil/perspiration residues; latent fingerprints; questioned documents; firearms and toolmarks, etc. Performs quality control and quality assurance practices. Prepares reagents and equipment for examinations. Testifies in court as an expert witness regarding analytical results, methodology, interpretation of results and establishment of reliability of each scientific field. Majority of the incumbents time will be spent working in the laboratory on assigned SLCPD cases; however, may occasionally be required to respond to crime scenes for processing and evidence collection. Incumbents working under this classification typically provide functional or technical supervision of Forensic Scientist I’s. Bachelor’s Degree from an accredited college or university in Forensic Science, Chemistry, Biology, Criminalistics or a closely related field plus proficiency in a recognized forensic discipline, along with four years of independent case work with the Salt Lake City Crime Laboratory or other similar forensic laboratory. In addition, completion of at least 160 hours of approved outside training related to one of the forensic disciplines recognized by the International Association for Identification (IAI), the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), or other recognized professional forensic organization. Experience and education may be substituted on a year for year basis. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$58,211 $63,769 $69,369 $59,624 $65,336 $71,101 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$61,226 $67,082 $72,956 $62,713 $68,731 $74,777 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$66,292 $73,895 $81,542 $68,194 $76,008 $83,881 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$69,732 $77,685 $85,643 $71,732 $79,906 $88,100 Overall 100%$63,865 $70,608 $77,378 $65,566 $72,495 $79,465 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$107,500 $120,700 $135,700 $111,700 $127,400 $149,000 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$109,300 $122,600 $137,800 $113,400 $129,500 $151,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$107,600 $120,800 $135,800 $111,700 $127,500 $149,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$109,300 $122,700 $137,900 $113,500 $129,500 $151,400 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$107,100 $120,200 $135,100 $111,200 $126,900 $148,400 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$108,800 $122,100 $137,300 $113,000 $128,900 $150,700 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$107,200 $120,300 $135,200 $111,300 $127,000 $148,500 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$108,900 $122,200 $137,400 $113,000 $129,000 $150,800 Overall 100%$108,213 $121,450 $136,525 $112,350 $128,213 $149,900 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$87,890 $97,673 $107,422 $87,890 $105,214 $114,311 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$88,327 $98,160 $107,958 $88,327 $105,737 $114,880 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$88,109 $97,917 $107,690 $88,109 $105,476 $114,596 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Determine map content, appearance, and layout for maximum information with high usability. Write and maintain internal manuals, training materials, and systems documentation as well as publicly available map resources. Deliver reports on geographic data, ensuring standardization, and quality control of data across reports. Develop and maintain software applications and databases for digital mapping and spatial data. Direct collection, storage, analysis, and interpretation of geospatial data. GIS; Supervises and monitors the day‐to‐day activities of a group of (typically non‐exempt) staff. Organizes work and provides direct supervision to subordinates. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 3+ years of related professional experience. Geographic Information Systems Management ‐ Supervisor Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information GEO INFO SYSTEMS (GIS) MGR ‐ 001593 3 $90,771 $92,685 Manages, plans, assigns, and reviews analysts and developers' work on GIS projects. Oversees the production of reports, maps, applications, and visualizations for internal or external stakeholders. Ensures proper maintenance, documentation, and cleaning of GIS data. Develops methods to leverage GIS data for new applications. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or equivalent. Typically reports to a director. Manages subordinate staff in the day‐to‐day performance of their jobs. True first level manager. Ensures that project/department milestones/goals are met and adhering to approved budgets. Has full authority for personnel actions. Typically requires 5 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. 1 ‐ 3 years supervisory experience may be required. Extensive knowledge of the function and department processes. Under the direction of a major engineering function and for Public Utilities under the direction of the GIS/IT System Administrator, performs all facets of the Geographic Information System (GIS), which includes supervision, design, complex technical review, development and management of department GIS projects. This is an advanced professional GIS position requiring extensive database design and management experience, proficiency in Computer Aided Mapping, especially ESRI’s software suite including; ArcMap, ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online and Portal and CMMS and asset management systems using Microsoft SQL Server, and technical competency in a variety of GIS functions. Bachelor’s degree in a technical or scientific field such as planning, geography, computer‐aided engineering, mathematics, computer science or a related field and four years experience in GIS, cartography, urban planning or engineering of which three years experience is in a supervisory capacity with GIS engineering related functions. A thorough knowledge of municipal engineering and civil design functions is required. $86,729 $96,658 $107,198 $88,675 $102,061 $114,653 GIS Manager Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database GIS Manager Manages analysts and technicians within the department. Develops and implements the best processes for tackling project requirements. Supports the day to day delivery of geospatial products and services. Runs geospatial analysis for a wide range of requests. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$53,405 $58,357 $63,280 $54,241 $59,284 $64,303 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, Gov't Support Services 25%$54,843 $59,906 $64,966 $55,701 $60,857 $66,016 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$58,867 $65,607 $72,354 $59,990 $66,853 $73,734 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$60,428 $67,370 $74,392 $61,581 $68,650 $75,811 Overall 100%$56,886 $62,810 $68,748 $57,878 $63,911 $69,966 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$70,400 $80,300 $89,400 $71,800 $83,100 $94,200 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$71,600 $81,600 $90,900 $73,000 $84,400 $95,700 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$70,800 $80,700 $89,900 $72,200 $83,500 $94,600 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$71,900 $82,000 $91,300 $73,400 $84,800 $96,200 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$70,100 $79,900 $89,000 $71,500 $82,700 $93,800 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$71,300 $81,200 $90,500 $72,700 $84,100 $95,300 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$70,500 $80,300 $89,500 $71,900 $83,100 $94,200 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$71,600 $81,600 $90,900 $73,000 $84,500 $95,800 Overall 100%$71,025 $80,950 $90,175 $72,438 $83,775 $94,975 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 25.0%$62,574 $69,213 $75,934 $63,018 $69,575 $79,449 Salt Lake Metro 25.0%$63,881 $70,659 $77,521 $64,334 $71,029 $81,108 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 25.0%$63,010 $67,013 $74,004 $65,299 $70,019 $76,377 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 25.0%No Data Available $67,028 No Data Available No Data Available $67,028 No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$63,155 $68,478 $75,820 $64,217 $69,413 $78,978 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Includes GIS data entry, data validation and maintenance of current GIS databases. Design, coordinate and prepare representations of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) databases. GIS; Fully applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency solving problems of moderate complexity. Contributes to completion of projects and programs in area of expertise. May interface with internal and/or external customers and provide guidance to non‐exempts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Geographic Information Systems Analyst Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information GIS PROGRAMMER ANALYST II ‐ 002540 4 $83,720 $83,990 Compiles, manipulates, and analyzes geospatial data. Designs, develops, and maintains databases and systems of GIS data. Creates reports, maps, applications, and visualizations conveying the results of spatial analyses. Utilizes scripting languages to refine GIS data pipelines and processes. May provide GIS training or assistance to other organization members. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or equivalent. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Typically requires 4 ‐7 years of related experience. This is an advanced professional and highly technical level position in the GIS series requiring incumbents to work independently with limited technical assistance and minimal supervision. Incumbents in this class lead in system administration of all facets of the geographic information system including design, complex technical review, and development of department GIS enterprise and web application projects. Incumbents participate in all phases of GIS desktop and internet application development, including analysis, design, development and maintenance of software programs, creation of technical design documents, technical and user test scripts and development of end user documentation. Bachelor's degree in a technical or scientific field such as planning, geography, computer‐aided engineering, mathematics, computer science or a related field plus four years experience in GIS, cartography, urban planning, or computer operations, including 3‐5 years' experience with GIS application development and/or geospatial programming.. Two years of additional education and/or experience in a GIS programming area may be substituted one for the other on a year‐for‐year basis. $63,689 $70,746 $78,248 $64,844 $72,366 $81,306 GIS Analyst III Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database GIS Analyst Designs and implements Geographic Information System (GIS) applications and integrates database repositories to compile geospatial data that can be used to make decisions and solve problems. Surveys physical geographic spaces, imports data into mapping software such as ArcGIS and analyzes the information to create digital maps. Develops visual diagrams and readies analysis reports on geographic trends. Updates outdated maps, transposes data from source documents to GIS format, and maintains the accuracy of geospatial data. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$53,373 $57,929 $62,342 $56,363 $61,219 $65,946 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$55,020 $59,778 $64,389 $58,103 $63,173 $68,111 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$58,289 $64,458 $70,486 $62,296 $68,873 $75,332 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$60,154 $66,598 $72,874 $64,290 $71,160 $77,884 Overall 100%$56,709 $62,191 $67,523 $60,263 $66,106 $71,818 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$68,100 $76,000 $84,500 $69,600 $78,400 $88,100 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$68,800 $76,800 $85,300 $70,300 $79,200 $89,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$61,400 $68,500 $76,200 $62,800 $70,700 $79,400 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$62,000 $69,200 $77,000 $63,400 $71,500 $80,200 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$67,800 $75,700 $84,100 $69,300 $78,100 $87,700 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$68,500 $76,400 $85,000 $70,000 $78,900 $88,600 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$61,100 $68,200 $75,900 $62,500 $70,400 $79,100 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$61,800 $68,900 $76,600 $63,100 $71,100 $79,900 Overall 100%$64,938 $72,463 $80,575 $66,375 $74,788 $84,000 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$59,853 $68,560 $79,102 $60,164 $69,177 $80,459 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%$61,378 $70,308 $81,117 $61,697 $70,940 $82,510 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 33.0%$56,915 $61,306 $71,604 $57,528 $61,306 $71,604 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$59,402 $66,761 $77,313 $59,815 $67,179 $78,234 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 25.0%$57,426 $61,608 $64,668 $58,650 $64,056 $71,604 Utah | All 25.0%$57,426 $61,608 $64,668 $58,650 $64,056 $71,604 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 25.0%$58,650 $63,342 $70,686 $59,160 $63,954 $72,420 Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 25.0%$58,650 $63,342 $70,686 $59,160 $63,954 $72,420 SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$58,038 $62,475 $67,677 $58,905 $64,005 $72,012 Survey Information CompData Grapic Designer/Artist Designs or creates quality graphic artwork for brochures, posters, manuals, books, and advertising materials. Uses own original and creative thinking to develop concepts and finished materials from rough ideas or customer's needs. Marks up, pastes, and assembles final layouts to prepare for printer. Draws and prints charts, graphs, illustrations, and other artwork, by hand or using computer. Broad knowledge of graphic art standards and equipment. Technical degree in graphic design or equivalent preferred and three years experience. Graphic Design Specialist III $76,516 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Graphic Design Specialist Communicates ideas and concepts visually through artistic measures, creative messaging, and computer technology, specializing in multiple fields. Designs and implements images and graphics to enhance books and magazines, advertisements, corporate logos, computer games, film titles and credits, web sites, exhibits, signage, educational materials, product packaging, brochures, logos, or business publications, working with electronic and print media. Plans layouts; sketches or chooses artwork, colors, and type size to produce an effective visual image; and develops sound and movement animation effects, utilizing expertise with software graphics. Economic Research Institute $59,772 $65,972 $73,272 $61,340 $68,019 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Direct marketing design projects, collaborating with multiple departments. Design and develop product brand identity. Create and assemble images and graphics to produce designs for websites, print media, product design, displays and productions. Design / Graphic Design; Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency in the primary duties of the job family. Plays a key role in Implementing projects and programs in the function. Acts as a resource to managers and employees in the organization. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Graphic Designer ‐ Intermediate Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Graphic Design Specialist II ‐ 002607 0 $68,286 $68,286 Designs and produces graphic art and visual materials for print and digital media. Ensures that layout and design are aligned with brand and production standards and follow best practices. Creates and executes design solutions and collateral used for marketing, advertising, sales, and other forms of communication. Coordinates with customers and stakeholders to conceptualize and deliver projects on time and budget. Experienced using a variety of design and editing tools and software such as Adobe. Knowledge of color, composition, typography, digital design and production management. Typically requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a manager. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Typically requires 4 ‐7 years of related experience. Under the guidance of the Director of Media and Engagement, this position works in collaboration with the Media Services, Civic Engagement, and Web teams. The primary responsibilities of this position include ‐ designs graphics for print, digital, and video production as well as coordinating printing, installation, and posting of communication and materials to support a wide range of city programs and initiatives. Create consistent, meaningful content for various City departments for use on the City’s government access channel, social media platforms, the internet, intranet web pages, and other applications. Graphic Design Specialist II – A Bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university with a focus in graphic design, marketing or other field closely related to this title and at least five (5) years paid employment in the industry. Education and experience may be substituted on a year for year basis. This level will work with teams to identify communication content, topics, and flow of information as well as mentors other staff members. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$51,061 $55,168 $59,066 $53,262 $57,574 $61,686 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$53,076 $57,368 $61,435 $55,363 $59,871 $64,160 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$55,982 $61,543 $66,854 $58,932 $64,774 $70,377 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$58,218 $64,013 $69,516 $61,286 $67,374 $73,179 Overall 100%$54,584 $59,523 $64,218 $57,211 $62,398 $67,351 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 25.0%$57,100 $64,100 $75,400 $59,000 $68,000 $83,000 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 25.0%$58,900 $66,100 $77,700 $60,800 $70,100 $85,600 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 25.0%$56,900 $63,800 $75,100 $58,800 $67,700 $82,700 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 25.0%$58,600 $65,800 $77,400 $60,600 $69,800 $85,200 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$57,875 $64,950 $76,400 $59,800 $68,900 $84,125 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Loan Workout Officer $67,351 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Mortgage Loan Officer Interviews applicants, and reviews, evaluates, and authorizes or recommends approval of customer applications for conventional residential mortgage and FHA/VA loans. Interviews applicant and requests specified information for mortgage loan application. Analyzes applicant financial status, credit, and property evaluation to determine feasibility of granting loan, or may submit application to Credit Analyst for verification and recommendation. Economic Research Institute $54,584 $59,523 $64,218 $57,211 $62,398 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale No Data Available Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information HOUSING & REHAB LOAN OFFICER ‐ 002034 1 $61,818 $61,818 Restructures loans; works with lending personnel and borrowers to better secure collateral and/or assets of the borrower. Works with small‐ and mid‐size loans of little to medium complexity. Typically requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Typically requires 0‐2 years of related experience. Under the general direction of the Housing Programs Manager of the Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development, incumbent assumes financial accountability and responsibility for the housing rehabilitation and first time homebuyers’ loan packaging process. Interviews homeowners, provides financial counseling, obtains and verifies information regarding income and expenses of clients. Determines eligibility of client and appropriate financing package, and prepares loan applications. Answers phone, responds to questions, accepts loan payments, creates initial project files, prepares reports, and enters transactions into the journal entry system. Closes loans when necessary. This position requires knowledge and experience in finance, loan processing, loan underwriting procedures, including basic FNMA/FHLMC lending and documentation requirements, and applicable Federal, State and local loan rehabilitation rules and regulations. Bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university in Public or Business Administration, Finance, Economics or, a related field and three (3) years’ experience in real estate, mortgage loan processing, public finance or other related field. Education and experience may be substituted one for the other on a year‐for‐year basis. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$59,914 $65,815 $71,418 $63,270 $69,481 $75,403 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$62,857 $69,084 $74,975 $66,374 $72,928 $79,153 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$54,480 $59,862 $64,928 $63,270 $69,481 $75,403 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$57,154 $62,831 $68,157 $66,374 $72,928 $79,153 Overall 100%$58,601 $64,398 $69,870 $64,822 $71,205 $77,278 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 25.0%$41,600 $47,200 $54,900 $43,200 $49,800 $59,100 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 25.0%$42,800 $48,700 $56,600 $44,500 $51,300 $60,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 25.0%$41,400 $47,000 $54,700 $43,000 $49,600 $58,900 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 25.0%$42,700 $48,400 $56,300 $44,300 $51,100 $60,700 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$42,125 $47,825 $55,625 $43,750 $50,450 $59,900 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale No Data Available Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information HOUSING LOAN ADMIN ‐ 002137 1 $54,475 $54,475 Performs administrative tasks for mortgage loan processing. Collects and prepares necessary information such as loan applications, credit documents, and appraisals to process and complete mortgage loan files. Verifies all documentation for accuracy and completeness. Tracks and monitors due dates. Ensures all documents are prepared and finalized in compliance with regulatory policies and procedures. Inputs and maintains all required transaction and processing records according to procedures. Responds to inquiries. Prepares required regulatory reporting. Requires a high school diploma or equivalent. Typically reports to a supervisor. Works under moderate supervision. Gaining or has attained full proficiency in a specific area of discipline. Typically requires 1‐3 years of related experience, or may need 0 years of experience with additional specialized training and/or certification. Under the general direction of the Housing & Neighborhood Development Program Manager, incumbent assumes responsibility for the servicing of all loans originated in the Housing & Neighborhood Development (HAND) Division including loans from the Rehabilitation and Home Buyer programs, Housing Trust Fund loans, Small Business Revolving loans, Commercial Façade grants, Zoning Violation fees and any other programs which may be authorized in the future. Prepares loan documents, builds new loans on the loan servicing system, receives and posts payments, prepares journal entries, reconciles system investor balances with general ledger balances, provides year‐end histories and tax forms to borrowers, interfaces with financial auditors and servicing system software vendors and closes loans when necessary. Bachelor’s degree in accounting, business management or related field plus one to three years related work experience. Education and experience may be substituted one for the other on a year‐for‐year basis. $50,363 $56,112 $62,747 $54,286 $60,827 $68,589 Mortgage Loan Processor II Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Mortgage Loan Coordinator Coordinates the mortgage loan process from start to closing. Compiles all required loan documents and applicant information, assesses loan applications for completion and accuracy, orders appraisals, submits loan package for approval, and addresses clearing conditions required for underwriting and closing. Schedules and tracks closing and loan lock expiration dates and updates the customer throughout the loan process. Assists the mortgage loan office by performing administrative tasks and acts as the main point of contact for customers. Answers customer inquiries, schedules appointments, and processes mortgage payments. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$59,892 $65,673 $71,576 $61,812 $67,804 $73,936 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$62,309 $68,367 $74,533 $64,307 $70,586 $76,990 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$68,070 $76,152 $84,359 $70,658 $79,039 $87,566 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$70,874 $79,299 $87,818 $73,568 $82,304 $91,156 Overall 100%$65,286 $72,373 $79,572 $67,586 $74,933 $82,412 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$78,900 $88,700 $99,900 $82,600 $92,800 $107,300 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$83,500 $93,800 $105,700 $87,400 $98,100 $113,500 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$73,600 $82,800 $93,200 $77,100 $86,600 $100,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$77,900 $87,500 $98,600 $81,500 $91,600 $105,900 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$78,700 $88,400 $99,600 $82,400 $92,500 $107,000 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$83,200 $93,500 $105,300 $87,100 $97,800 $113,100 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$73,400 $82,500 $93,000 $76,900 $86,300 $99,800 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$77,600 $87,300 $98,300 $81,300 $91,300 $105,600 Overall 100%$78,350 $88,063 $99,200 $82,038 $92,125 $106,538 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%No Data Available $104,795 No Data Available No Data Available $104,795 No Data Available Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$88,902 $98,880 $111,735 $92,315 $102,664 $117,780 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$88,902 $101,838 $111,735 $92,315 $103,730 $117,780 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available HR Business Partner III $102,243 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Human Resources Business Partner Coordinates alignment of business objectives with employees and management in designated business units. Consults with management on human resource‐related issues, suggests new HR strategies, and provides HR guidance when appropriate. Evaluates and anticipates HR‐related needs, and communicates needs with the HR Department and business management. Analyzes trends and metrics in partnership with the HR group to develop solutions, programs, and policies. Develops partnerships across the HR function to deliver value‐ added service to management and employees that reflects the business objectives of the organization. Economic Research Institute $77,513 $87,424 $96,836 $80,646 $90,263 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Lead a team of HR staff to develop, plan and implement various HR initiatives such as compensation, benefits and performance management programs. Advise managers on organizational policy issues and recommend needed changes. Analyze HR practices, and recommend employee relations, employment, compensation and benefits policies to establish competitive programs and ensure legal compliance. Generalist / HR Management; Seasoned professional in the job family. This is the level of full competence that all professionals are expected to achieve in the function. Manages program and project implementation and makes significant contributions to department goals and planning efforts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5‐7 years of related professional experience. Human Resources Business Partner ‐ Senior/Career Level Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information HR BUSINESS PARTNER II ‐ 002591 6 $85,249 $85,197 Provides human resources consultation and support to a designated business unit to define and execute HR strategies that enable accomplishment of business objectives. Develops workforce plans and an understanding of external customer trends and issues in the industry that could potentially impact business. Leads organizational assessment that converts strategies into result‐driven actions. Utilizes knowledge of various human resources functions to provide tactical support to line managers. Acts as liaison with other HR functions. Provides change management leadership as needed. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or equivalent. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Typically requires 4 ‐7 years of related experience. Working under limited supervision, incumbent is responsible for providing strategic HR support to designated city departments. Responsibilities include more complex analysis of business and operational needs, workforce planning, staff development, performance management, complaint investigation, contract interpretation, grievance and discipline administration, classification and compensation issues and change management. Key areas of knowledge, skills and ability include: excellent conflict resolution, problem‐solving and negotiation and influential skills. Works with employees at all levels of the organization and handles highly sensitive issues with integrity and professionalism. Develops partnerships across all human resource functions to deliver value‐added service to management and employees that reflects the business objectives of the organization. Anticipates, evaluates, and communicates HR‐related business needs with the HR department and business unit management. Incumbents at this level possess the skill and demonstrated ability to apply more advanced knowledge and effectiveness in all human resource disciplines, along with technical guidance to lower level staff, as needed . Bachelor’s degree in Human Resource Management, Business Administration, Public Administration or closely related field plus five or more years professional experience in human resource management including emphases in employment law, recruiting, workplace investigations, and resolution of complex employee relations issues. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$52,195 $56,980 $61,761 $53,253 $58,151 $63,053 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$54,228 $59,252 $64,269 $55,328 $60,470 $65,614 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$57,468 $64,029 $70,679 $58,887 $65,604 $72,424 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$59,765 $66,647 $73,597 $61,240 $68,286 $75,414 Overall 100%$55,914 $61,727 $67,577 $57,177 $63,128 $69,126 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$58,400 $66,100 $74,400 $60,500 $68,900 $77,500 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$60,300 $68,300 $76,800 $62,500 $71,100 $80,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$55,000 $62,300 $70,100 $57,000 $64,900 $73,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$56,900 $64,400 $72,400 $58,900 $67,000 $75,400 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$58,200 $65,800 $74,100 $60,300 $68,600 $77,100 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$60,100 $68,000 $76,500 $62,200 $70,800 $79,700 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$54,800 $62,000 $69,800 $56,800 $64,600 $72,700 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$56,600 $64,100 $72,100 $58,600 $66,700 $75,100 Overall 100%$57,538 $65,125 $73,275 $59,600 $67,825 $76,313 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$66,440 $74,956 $84,556 $66,988 $76,426 $85,653 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%$66,598 $75,135 $84,756 $67,147 $76,608 $85,857 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 33.0%$68,622 $74,349 $84,412 $68,622 $74,349 $84,412 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$67,214 $74,817 $84,576 $67,581 $75,802 $85,313 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$54,162 $59,466 $65,790 $54,162 $59,466 $65,790 Utah | All 50.0%$54,162 $59,466 $65,790 $54,162 $59,466 $65,790 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$54,162 $59,466 $65,790 $54,162 $59,466 $65,790 Survey Information CompData Recruiter I Screens, interviews, and selects applicants. Maintains human resources programs through recruiting process, including affirmative action and career development programs. Provides ongoing training to hiring managers regarding recruitment processes within legal and organization policies. May assist in writing advertisements and analyzing reports and trends. Possesses knowledge of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) and Affirmative Action (AA) programs, policies, and procedures. Bachelor's degree required and two years experience. Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Arrange for interviews and provide travel arrangements as necessary. Advise managers and employees on policies and procedures. May be involved in writing and placing advertising for open positions in publications; online and print. Source, screen and interview applicants to obtain information on work history, training, education, and job skills for open positions; may utilize ATS. Establish and maintain relationships with hiring managers to stay abreast of current and future hiring and business needs. Recruiter / (General); Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency in the primary duties of the job family. Plays a key role in Implementing projects and programs in the function. Acts as a resource to managers and employees in the organization. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Recruiter ‐ Intermediate Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information HR RECRUITER ‐ 002297 1 $65,000 $65,000 Attracts, evaluates, and refers candidates for open positions through recruiting website, employee referrals, on‐site recruiting, search firms and other sourcing methods. Develops job advertisements and screens resumes/applications. Contacts candidates to ascertain fit, and schedules interviews. Extends offers and negotiates compensation. Initiates onboarding plan for new hires. Ensures assigned positions are filled efficiently and effectively. May facilitate orientation for new employees and perform exit interviews for employees leaving the organization. May require a bachelor's degree in human resources. Typically reports to a supervisor or manager. Occasionally directed in several aspects of the work. Gaining exposure to some of the complex tasks within the job function. Typically requires 2 ‐4 years of related experience. Under the direction of Recruitment & Onboarding Manager, incumbent performs professional level duties to attract, screen, recruit, and aide with selection of new employees, including hiring of candidates for executive level and hard‐to‐fill jobs. Assists hiring managers and supervisors select the most qualified candidates. Coordinates employment offers with applicant and hiring department. Provides applicants with pre‐employment information regarding job requirements, work location, wages, benefits, allowances and employment policies. Participates in planning and conducting specialized recruiting campaigns and programs. Represents the city at community events and job career fairs. Monitors, tracks, and assists new hires during employee onboarding process. Bachelor’s degree in Human Resource Management, Business Administration, Public Administration or closely related field plus two to four years professional experience in recruiting. Directly related work experience may be substituted for education on a year‐for‐year basis. A master’s degree in a related field or Professional in Human Resources (PHR) certification may substituted for two years of experience. $58,707 $65,284 $72,804 $59,630 $66,555 $74,135 Recruiter II Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Recruiter Converses with and asks questions of job applicants to select people meeting employer qualifications. Checks employment applications and examines work history, education and training, job skills, compensation needs, and other qualifications of applicants. Records additional knowledge, skills, abilities, interests, test results, and other data pertinent to selection and referral of applicants. Reviews job orders and matches applicants with job requirements, utilizing manual or computerized file search. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$64,313 $70,127 $75,901 $66,132 $72,132 $78,103 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$68,877 $75,150 $81,364 $70,824 $77,299 $83,724 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$73,552 $81,530 $89,403 $76,001 $84,237 $92,380 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$78,838 $87,403 $95,819 $81,463 $90,305 $99,009 Overall 100%$71,395 $78,553 $85,622 $73,605 $80,993 $88,304 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$79,100 $88,700 $100,000 $81,500 $92,300 $105,400 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$81,400 $91,300 $103,000 $83,900 $95,000 $108,500 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$75,900 $85,100 $96,000 $78,200 $88,600 $101,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$78,100 $87,600 $98,800 $80,500 $91,200 $104,100 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$78,800 $88,400 $99,700 $81,300 $92,000 $105,100 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$81,200 $91,000 $102,600 $83,600 $94,700 $108,100 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$75,700 $84,800 $95,700 $78,000 $88,300 $100,800 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$77,900 $87,300 $98,500 $80,300 $90,900 $103,800 Overall 100%$78,513 $88,025 $99,288 $80,913 $91,625 $104,613 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$86,063 $95,748 $104,746 $88,251 $97,587 $109,346 Salt Lake Metro 0.0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 34.0%$89,828 $98,365 $110,678 $90,466 $101,250 $112,876 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 33.0%$86,073 $110,033 $121,500 $91,850 $110,033 $121,500 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Overall 100%$87,346 $101,352 $112,292 $90,192 $102,940 $114,557 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available HRIS Analyst III $102,491 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database HRIS Analyst Performs analyses, tests, and administrates HRIS computer system modules including, but not limited to, human resources, compensation, payroll, benefits, etc. Keeps integrity and accuracy of database. Investigates programs to process data and solve human resources problems by use of computers‐‐computer systems support may be mainframe, mini, and/or personal computers. Economic Research Institute $79,085 $89,310 $99,067 $81,570 $91,853 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Analyze, maintain and troubleshoot human resource information systems and other human resources computer applications and systems. Assist in the design, development and modification of HRIS to suit organizational needs. May act as administrator to create security model based on functional responsibilities and configure HR system to enforce the security access to data. Train employees on system usage. Lead projects which impacts data maintenance on the HRIS, including mass updates. Plan and develop analyses, reports, and presentations. HR Information Systems; Seasoned professional in the job family. This is the level of full competence that all professionals are expected to achieve in the function. Manages program and project implementation and makes significant contributions to department goals and planning efforts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5‐7 years of related professional experience. Human Resources Information Systems Analyst Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information HRIS ANALYST ‐ 002155 2 $89,471 $89,471 Administers, develops, and researches the Human Resources Information System (HRIS). Configures the system to meet ongoing business needs and generates reports to support HR functions, including compensation, compliance, performance management, and workforce analytics. Ensures that data is accurately processed and maintained according to organization rules and applicable regulations. May be responsible for defining system requirements and working with external vendors to evaluate and select HRIS software and systems. Typically requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Typically requires 4 ‐7 years of related experience. The Human Resources Information Systems (HRIS) Business Analyst, coordinates, and acts as a strategic partner to provide support, analysis, assessment, design and improvement HRIS business solutions and related systems. Ensures the proper function, operation and integrity of human resources information and operations systems. Essential duties include: identification of HR business needs; research and report writing; training and assisting users; troubleshooting and resolving process and systems errors; coordination of system enhancements, system integrations, and security issues. Compiles reports and data related to human resources functions. Bachelor degree in Human Resource Management, Human Resource Information Systems (HRIS), Business Administration, Public Administration or closely related field plus 4‐6 years related professional experience. Directly related work experience may be substituted for education on a year for year basis. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$62,429 $68,561 $74,838 $64,445 $70,800 $77,320 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$64,970 $71,386 $77,931 $67,068 $73,718 $80,515 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$71,614 $80,179 $88,847 $74,336 $83,218 $92,224 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$74,573 $83,483 $92,465 $77,407 $86,647 $95,980 Overall 100%$68,397 $75,902 $83,520 $70,814 $78,596 $86,510 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$74,500 $87,700 $101,700 $77,000 $92,600 $109,500 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$78,200 $92,000 $106,800 $80,800 $97,300 $114,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$71,600 $84,200 $97,700 $73,900 $89,000 $105,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$75,100 $88,400 $102,600 $77,600 $93,400 $110,400 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$74,200 $87,300 $101,300 $76,700 $92,300 $109,000 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$77,900 $91,700 $106,400 $80,500 $96,900 $114,500 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$71,300 $83,800 $97,300 $73,600 $88,600 $104,700 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$74,800 $88,000 $102,100 $77,300 $93,000 $109,900 Overall 100%$74,700 $87,888 $101,988 $77,175 $92,888 $109,750 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 25.0%$76,124 $87,794 $98,103 $76,644 $88,628 $99,860 Salt Lake Metro 25.0%$77,651 $89,555 $100,070 $78,181 $90,405 $101,863 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 25.0%$73,257 $85,905 $94,238 $73,966 $88,452 $97,081 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 25.0%No Data Available $73,782 No Data Available No Data Available $73,782 No Data Available Overall 100%$75,677 $84,259 $97,470 $76,264 $85,317 $99,601 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Plan, manage and coordinate all human resources initiatives; recruitment, compensation, benefits, training and employee relations of an organization. Advise and coach managers on HR policies and programs including employee relations issues. Manage daily departmental operations, business planning and budget development of HR programs. Ensure policies, procedures and HR programs are consistently administered, aligned with organizational goals and are in compliance with professional standards, state and federal regulatory requirements and laws. Generalist / HR Management; Supervises and monitors the day‐to‐day activities of a group of (typically non‐exempt) staff. Organizes work and provides direct supervision to subordinates. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 3+ years of related professional experience. Human Resources Management (not including CHRO) ‐ Supervisor Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information HUMAN RESOURCES SUPERVISOR ‐ 002515 3 $82,146 $82,909 Develops and administers human resources programs and policies including staffing, compensation, benefits, immigration, employee relations, training, and health and safety. Ensures human resources strategies align with organizational business goals. Supervises human resources processes to ensure efficient operations for the organization. Requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Supervises a small group of para‐professional staff in an organization characterized by highly transactional or repetitive processes. Contributes to the development of processes and procedures. Thorough knowledge of functional area under supervision. Typically requires 3 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. Supervises the day to day activities of employees in one or more human resource functions including: classification, compensation, benefits administration; recruitment and selection; employee relations; EEO compliance; training & development. Assists with developing and recommending business practices, performance measures, policies and procedures. Provides technical assistance and consultation to department management, division directors, supervisors and employees about human resource rules, policies, principles, business practices and procedures. In addition to supervisory responsibilities, incumbent also performs similar tasks as the assigned employees. Bachelor's degree in Human Resource Management, or related field, plus four to five years of professional human resource experience and experience in functional area of expertise. Directly related work experience may be substituted for education on a year‐for‐year basis. A master’s degree in a related field or Human Resources Certification (PHR) or (SHRM‐CP) may be substituted for two years of education or experience. $72,925 $82,683 $94,326 $74,751 $85,600 $98,620 HR Supervisor Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Human Resources Supervisor Supervises activities of employees engaged in compensation, training, employment, benefits administration, employee records, labor relations, safety, affirmative action and employment equity programs, and/or personnel research. Aids in developing and implementing methods and procedures for monitoring work activities, such as preparation of records of expenditures and progress reports, in order to inform management of current status or work activities. When supervising employees engaged chiefly in one functional area, is required to be adept in activities of employees supervised. When supervising employees in several functional areas, is required to possess general knowledge of the activities involved. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$89,114 $98,773 $108,704 $101,409 $112,517 $123,994 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$93,494 $103,471 $113,701 $106,393 $117,870 $129,693 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$108,159 $121,084 $134,751 $124,793 $139,670 $155,475 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$113,140 $126,411 $140,376 $130,540 $145,815 $161,964 Overall 100%$100,977 $112,435 $124,383 $115,784 $128,968 $142,782 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$101,900 $112,900 $123,900 $106,700 $119,100 $132,800 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$103,200 $114,300 $125,500 $108,100 $120,600 $134,500 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$106,700 $118,100 $129,700 $111,700 $124,600 $139,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$108,000 $119,600 $131,300 $113,100 $126,100 $140,700 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$101,600 $112,500 $123,600 $106,400 $118,700 $132,400 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$102,900 $114,000 $125,100 $107,700 $120,200 $134,100 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$106,300 $117,700 $129,300 $111,300 $124,200 $138,500 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$107,700 $119,200 $130,900 $112,700 $125,800 $140,300 Overall 100%$104,788 $116,038 $127,413 $109,713 $122,413 $136,538 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$67,033 $75,952 $88,120 $67,739 $77,226 $89,240 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$67,708 $76,717 $89,008 $68,421 $78,005 $90,139 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$67,370 $76,334 $88,564 $68,080 $77,616 $89,689 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Create and maintain a information technology project plan that communicates tasks, milestone dates, status and resource allocation. Utilize software life‐cycle methodology. Coordinate delivery of development (beta) and production releases that meet quality assurance standards. Assist test team in creating test plans and testing efforts. Assist technical team in design and development tasks. Project Management; On a limited basis, applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Work, closely managed, involves limited problem‐solving, following standardized practices and procedures. Typically interfaces with Supervisor/Manager and other Professionals in work group. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree Project Management, IT ‐ Entry Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information INFO TECH PROJECT MANAGER ‐ 002346 2 $100,589 $100,589 Manages and oversees all aspects of a technology project to ensure it is completed on‐time and within budget. Has overall responsibility for managing scope, cost, schedule, internal staffing, vendors, and contractual deliverables. Develops detailed project plans. Monitors project milestones and generate periodic status reports. Evaluates and manages risk. Incorporates quality measures and standards to project deliverables. Possesses strong knowledge of technology. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or equivalent. May require project management certification. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Typically requires 4 ‐7 years of related experience. Reporting to the Technology Solution Team Leader, the Information Technology (IT) Project Manager manages the flow of data related to Information Technology projects and advances new initiatives from the department/division. Exercises discretion and independent judgment regarding matters of significance, specifically in relation to assigned projects. The primary goal of the IT Project Manager is to assist the department in “telling its story” to the administration and to the rest of the City departments. Bachelor’s degree in Information Technology, Business Administration or related field. Five years of job related experience. $91,045 $101,602 $113,453 $97,859 $109,665 $123,003 IT Project Manager II Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Information Technology Project Manager Manages, coordinates, and establishes priorities for complete life‐cycle of Information Technology projects including the planning, design, programming, testing, and implementation of solutions designed to meet the project requirements. Determines project needs and acquires resources required for the success of the project. Designs project plans which identify needs and define major tasks and milestones, based on scope, resources, budget, and personnel. Directs technological research by studying organization goals, strategies, practices, and user projects. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$72,771 $79,628 $86,456 $75,034 $82,129 $89,207 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$76,103 $83,214 $90,216 $78,469 $85,827 $93,086 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$85,064 $94,389 $103,530 $88,126 $97,777 $107,256 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$85,064 $94,389 $103,530 $88,126 $97,777 $107,256 Overall 100%$79,751 $87,905 $95,933 $82,439 $90,878 $99,201 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$106,800 $122,800 $140,800 $111,000 $130,100 $154,300 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$109,000 $125,400 $143,700 $113,300 $132,800 $157,500 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$100,500 $115,600 $132,600 $104,400 $122,400 $145,200 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$102,600 $118,000 $135,300 $106,600 $125,000 $148,200 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$106,400 $122,400 $140,400 $110,600 $129,600 $153,800 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$108,600 $124,900 $143,300 $112,900 $132,300 $156,900 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$100,200 $115,200 $132,100 $104,100 $122,000 $144,700 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$102,200 $117,600 $134,800 $106,200 $124,500 $147,700 Overall 100%$104,538 $120,238 $137,875 $108,638 $127,338 $151,038 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 25.0%$88,380 $97,102 $106,822 $88,380 $97,466 $107,930 Salt Lake Metro 25.0%$86,532 $95,073 $104,590 $86,532 $95,429 $105,675 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 25.0%$93,317 $107,406 $118,976 $93,704 $107,941 $120,806 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 25.0%$91,611 $99,225 $111,542 $91,611 $99,225 $111,542 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$89,960 $99,702 $110,483 $90,057 $100,015 $111,488 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Oversee laboratory safety policies, training, and enforcement. Assist with experiments and procedures. Inventory, stock, audit and organize supplies and chemicals. Train, supervise, and mentor laboratory assistants, students and technicians. Manages Professional employees and/or Supervisors. Has budget, deadline responsibility in the area managed. Typically responsible for the day‐to‐day management of one functional area. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5+ years of related professional experience, 1+ years supervisory experience. Laboratory Management ‐ 1st Level Manager Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information LABORATORY PROGRAM MANAGER ‐ 001922 1 $83,949 $83,949 Oversees the analysis and evaluation of air, water, and land systems to determine if pollutants are present and directs the implementation of appropriate corrective action if necessary. Develops and plans policies and procedures related to air, water, and land systems in accordance with organization and government rules and regulations. Evaluates operations and makes recommendations to reduce waste or pollution. Requires a bachelor's degree in engineering or related discipline. Typically reports to head of a unit/department. Reporting to the Water Reclamation Plant Deputy Manager, the incumbent manages the laboratory program and supervises the laboratory staff. This is a professional chemistry position responsible for ensuring compliance with NELAP requirements for maintaining laboratory certification for all necessary parameters, as well as quality assurance. Performs routine analysis and/or research to include chemical and microbiological testing of wastewater, sludge and soils for Salt lake City Corporation. Bachelor's degree in Chemistry, Biochemical Engineering, Bacteriology, Microbiology, or a closely related scientific field, from an accredited college or university, and six years’ related water/wastewater laboratory analytical experience. $91,416 $102,615 $114,764 $93,711 $106,077 $120,576 Environmental Engineering Manager Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Laboratory Manager Manages and coordinates activities of workers engaged in performing chemical, microscopic, and bacteriologic tests to obtain data for use in a variety of settings, including research and medical. Establishes specimen preparation procedures, develops and implements analytical procedures, and evaluates laboratory information. Consults and acts as a resource to subject matter experts and other practitioners, and reports results according to protocols mandated by the governing organization. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$63,164 $69,307 $75,522 $65,054 $71,406 $77,844 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$64,847 $71,212 $77,711 $66,787 $73,368 $80,101 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$72,195 $80,635 $89,113 $74,744 $83,473 $92,259 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$74,226 $83,089 $92,039 $76,846 $86,014 $95,289 Overall 100%$68,608 $76,061 $83,596 $70,858 $78,565 $86,373 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 25.0%$56,900 $72,900 $89,800 $57,000 $73,300 $89,800 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 25.0%$57,900 $74,200 $91,300 $58,000 $74,500 $91,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 25.0%$56,700 $72,600 $89,400 $56,800 $72,900 $89,400 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 25.0%$57,700 $73,900 $90,900 $57,800 $74,200 $90,900 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$57,300 $73,400 $90,350 $57,400 $73,725 $90,350 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Landscape Architect III $88,362 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Landscape Architect Designs and plans development of land areas for projects, such as parks and other recreational facilities, airports, highways and parkways, hospitals, schools, land subdivisions, and commercial, industrial, and residential sites. Confers with clients, engineering personnel, and architects on overall program. Collects and analyzes data on such site conditions as geographic location; soil, vegetation, and rock features; drainage; and location of structures for preparation of environmental impact report and development of landscaping plans. Architects are typically required to be licensed or registered. Licensing is based on the Landscape Architect Registration Examination sponsored by the Council of Landscape Architectural Registration Boards. Economic Research Institute $62,954 $74,730 $86,973 $64,129 $76,145 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale No Data Available Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT III ‐ 000753 1 $78,956.80 $78,956.80 Assists in the development of exterior spaces and physical environments. Prepares overview of final project design drawings and specifications. Develops schematic designs and construction details, helps in cost estimation of project, and works with project architects or outside consultants as needed. Requires a bachelor's degree in architecture. Typically reports to a Landscape Architect Manager. Typically requires 4 to 7 years of related experience. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. As a registered professional landscape architect, supervises and manages major projects involving park, recreation, landscape planning and development. This is a highly responsible position in management, planning, design and development of municipal land and facilities. Bachelor's Degree in landscape architecture from a fully accredited college or university and ﬁve years' paid work experience performing planning, design and construcƟon management of landscape architectural projects. Experience must include one year of supervisory experience. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$53,913 $58,898 $63,827 $55,651 $60,823 $65,952 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$56,671 $61,930 $67,117 $58,497 $63,954 $69,351 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$59,260 $66,008 $72,737 $61,591 $68,596 $75,599 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$62,311 $69,406 $76,444 $64,763 $72,127 $79,452 Overall 100%$58,039 $64,061 $70,031 $60,126 $66,375 $72,589 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 16.6%$62,400 $69,700 $76,700 $63,900 $71,600 $79,500 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$64,200 $71,700 $78,900 $65,800 $73,700 $81,800 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$58,200 $65,000 $71,600 $59,600 $66,800 $74,200 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 16.6%$62,100 $69,400 $76,300 $63,600 $71,300 $79,100 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$63,900 $71,400 $78,600 $65,500 $73,400 $81,500 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$57,900 $64,700 $71,200 $59,400 $66,500 $73,800 Overall 100%$61,204 $68,375 $75,248 $62,715 $70,268 $78,003 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$63,002 $70,712 $79,047 $63,002 $70,792 $79,591 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$65,466 $73,478 $82,140 $65,466 $73,562 $82,704 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$64,234 $72,095 $80,594 $64,234 $72,177 $81,148 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Keeps office supplies in stock. Manages schedules for appointment, meetings, conferences, etc. Drafts documents for staff across a variety of legal disciplines. Provides support to lawyers and paralegals with research, traveling arrangements, and other important tasks. Support / Administration (Legal); Leads specialized area of administrative support or provides support to Vice President or higher. Full knowledge of procedures in area of expertise. May provide work direction to lower‐level support employees. Receives broad supervision. Typically requires: High School diploma or GED, at least 5 years of related experience, thorough knowledge of policies and procedures, highly tactful communications, expertise with related systems. Legal Administrative Assistant ‐ Senior Administrative Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information LAW OFFICE MANAGER ‐ 000255 1 $63,690 $63,690 Provides multi‐faceted administrative support and assistance to ensure effective use of an executive's time and productive interactions with staff and the public. Handles a wide range of administrative and support tasks and independently initiates and implements processes to manage projects, information, and people. Manages the executive's schedule, meeting preparations, follow‐up tasks, and complex travel arrangements. Conducts research and information gathering on behalf of the executive and prepares summaries and reports. Develops positive and strategic relationships at all levels of the organization. Uses discretion, judgement, and knowledge of the organization to facilitate the executive's activities and maintain confidentiality. May be responsible for directing and deploying support staff or other resources. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or equivalent. Typically reports to an executive. Occasionally directed in several aspects of the work. Gaining exposure to some of the complex tasks within the job function. Typically requires 2 ‐4 years of related experience. With independent judgment, performs a wide variety of administrative duties including divisional/departmental budget preparation and monitoring, purchasing, personnel and payroll operations, technical support, and supervision of other law office staff. Advises City Attorney and City Prosecutor on administrative/operational developments which are important to or may Impact divisional or departmental operations. Associate degree in accounting, office management or related legal field, and four years experience in a law office performing office and staff management duties similar to those detailed above. Experience must include a minimum of one year experience in budgetary preparation and expenditure monitoring and one year supervisory experience. Two years related legal office management experience or paralegal/legal assistant certification may be substituted for education on a year for year basis. $61,159 $68,177 $75,291 $62,358 $69,607 $77,246 Executive Assistant II Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Office Manager Manages and organizes office operations and procedures, such as word processing, bookkeeping, preparation of payrolls, flow of correspondence, filing, requisition of supplies, and other clerical services. Coordinates activities of various clerical departments or workers within department. Evaluates office production, updates procedures, or devises new forms to improve efficiency of workflow. Establishes uniform correspondence procedures and style practices. Formulates procedures for systematic retention, protection, retrieval, transfer, and disposal of records. This position is similar to an Office Supervisor, but scope of unit supervised typically involves a larger number of employees and more varied office activities. Position requires experience in the classifications managed. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$65,568 $72,018 $78,551 $69,233 $76,087 $83,050 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$68,972 $75,726 $82,535 $72,827 $80,004 $87,262 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$76,354 $85,147 $93,998 $81,299 $90,648 $100,086 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$80,248 $89,385 $98,543 $85,446 $95,159 $104,926 Overall 100%$72,786 $80,569 $88,407 $77,201 $85,475 $93,831 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 16.6%$60,900 $67,600 $75,200 $63,800 $71,100 $78,900 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$63,500 $70,400 $78,400 $66,600 $74,200 $82,200 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$61,300 $68,000 $75,700 $64,200 $71,600 $79,400 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 16.6%$60,600 $67,300 $74,900 $63,600 $70,800 $78,500 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$63,200 $70,100 $78,100 $66,300 $73,800 $81,900 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 16.6%$61,000 $67,700 $75,300 $64,000 $71,300 $79,000 Overall 100%$61,503 $68,243 $75,962 $64,491 $71,845 $79,663 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$65,922 $71,793 $78,809 $66,439 $73,593 $80,660 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$69,378 $75,555 $82,939 $69,921 $77,451 $84,888 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$67,650 $73,674 $80,874 $68,180 $75,522 $82,774 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Evaluate and select learning software and training initiatives. Create and adapt curriculum for a variety of audiences and learning delivery methods. Collect data and analyze the impact of long‐term and specific initiatives. Assess, plan, develop, and deliver training and learning initiatives. Training; Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency in the primary duties of the job family. Plays a key role in Implementing projects and programs in the function. Acts as a resource to managers and employees in the organization. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Training Specialist Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST ‐ 002516 1 $70,637 $70,637 Implements all aspects of organizational development. Develops training programs, facilitates change management initiatives, and reviews current development programs to ensure linkage to company goals. Builds human capital through employee development programs. Measures employee performance to gauge the success of programs and identify areas for improvement. Implements and reports on the effectiveness of leadership development, team development, and organizational communication programs and practices. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or equivalent. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Occasionally directed in several aspects of the work. Gaining exposure to some of the complex tasks within the job function. Typically requires 2 ‐4 years of related experience. With minimal supervision, incumbent serves as the Super Admin of the city’s learning management system (LMS), including responsibility for day‐to‐day management and operation. Develops, coordinates, delivers, and evaluates various training, development courses and learning programs. Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration, Human Resource Development, Organizational Behavior, Public Administration, or related field, and four to six years’ experience in training or employee development, including experiences in LMS administration and online course authoring tools. Experience may be substituted for education on a year for year basis for up to a maximum of four years. $67,313 $74,162 $81,747 $69,957 $77,614 $85,423 Organizational Learning and Development Specialist II Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database LMS Manager Researches, develops, and maintains training needs of organization. Manages and coordinates activities of LMS department staff. Provides training for end users and department staff. Identify any gaps or issues found in training or administration. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$48,740 $53,050 $57,251 $49,466 $53,854 $58,135 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$50,819 $55,355 $59,773 $51,577 $56,193 $60,697 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$52,041 $57,836 $63,513 $53,013 $58,912 $64,699 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$54,292 $60,389 $66,345 $55,306 $61,512 $67,584 Overall 100%$51,473 $56,658 $61,721 $52,341 $57,618 $62,779 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$57,600 $65,700 $75,100 $59,600 $68,200 $78,800 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$59,600 $68,000 $77,700 $61,700 $70,600 $81,500 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$52,800 $60,300 $68,900 $54,700 $62,600 $72,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$54,700 $62,400 $71,300 $56,600 $64,800 $74,800 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$57,400 $65,400 $74,700 $59,300 $67,900 $78,400 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$59,400 $67,700 $77,400 $61,400 $70,300 $81,200 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$52,600 $60,000 $68,600 $54,400 $62,300 $71,900 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$54,400 $62,100 $71,000 $56,300 $64,500 $74,500 Overall 100%$56,063 $63,950 $73,088 $58,000 $66,400 $76,675 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah | All Industries 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | All Industries 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Sector/Government 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, All Industries 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Legal Secretary III $69,727 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Legal Secretary Assists attorneys by performing secretarial work of a complex nature, which includes typing and handling papers and correspondence of legal nature, such as contracts, briefs, warrants, summonses, complaints, indictments, motions, subpoenas, and papers for filing and serving. Composes and prepares routine correspondence. Proofreads legal documents. Arranges appointments and meetings. Remains knowledgeable of current legal procedures and terminology. Economic Research Institute $53,768 $60,304 $67,404 $55,170 $62,009 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale No Data Available Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information LEGAL SECRETARY III ‐ 003136 3 $54,579 $57,200 Performs secretarial and administrative duties for an attorney or group of attorneys. Prepares legal documents, contracts, briefs, motions, summonses, complaints and general correspondence. Maintains files and schedules. Utilizes document creation software and other legal reference software. May need to interact with clients or participate in meetings discussing sensitive or confidential matters. Requires knowledge of legal terminology and standard formats and procedures. Requires a high school diploma. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Works independently within established procedures associated with the specific job function. Has gained proficiency in multiple competencies relevant to the job. Typically requires 3‐5 years of related experience, or may need 2 years experience with additional specialized training and/or certification. Performs a variety of research and office support functions for the attorneys, Risk Manager, legal clerks, professional staff, assigned to the City Attorney’s office staff. This is highly responsible process management work requiring thorough knowledge of legal terminology, and project management. This is the senior level staff support position in the career ladder series. Graduation from high school or the equivalent and six years' work experience performing legal secretarial and staff support duties, four (4) years of which must be in a city attorney's, county attorney’s or prosecutor's office or equivalent performing legal secretarial and staff support duties. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$63,258 $67,931 $72,243 $63,258 $67,931 $72,243 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$67,084 $72,217 $76,927 $67,084 $72,217 $76,927 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$71,648 $78,138 $84,127 $71,648 $78,138 $84,127 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$76,280 $83,312 $89,742 $76,280 $83,312 $89,742 Overall 100%$69,568 $75,400 $80,760 $69,568 $75,400 $80,760 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$65,900 $70,700 $78,600 $67,500 $72,600 $81,600 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$66,100 $70,900 $78,700 $67,700 $72,800 $81,800 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$63,300 $67,800 $75,400 $64,800 $69,700 $78,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$63,400 $68,000 $75,500 $64,900 $69,800 $78,500 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$65,700 $70,400 $78,200 $67,200 $72,300 $81,300 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$65,800 $70,600 $78,400 $67,400 $72,500 $81,500 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$63,000 $67,500 $75,000 $64,500 $69,400 $78,000 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$63,100 $67,700 $75,200 $64,600 $69,500 $78,100 Overall 100%$64,538 $69,200 $76,875 $66,075 $71,075 $79,888 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$65,922 $71,793 $78,809 $66,439 $73,593 $80,660 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$69,378 $75,555 $82,939 $69,921 $77,451 $84,888 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$67,650 $73,674 $80,874 $68,180 $75,522 $82,774 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Gather relevant information pertaining to case issues. Facilitate education, support groups and referrals. Assess and treat patients and their families in understanding and coping with emotional and social problems. Maintain caseload, documentation and reevaluate patients at appropriate intervals. Provide advocacy and resource services for the patient. Social Work; Advanced individual contributor professional with responsibility for clinical, therapeutic, or diagnostic procedures. Responsible for the development and implementation of treatment plans which may require significant departures from traditional approaches. Often referenced as "Therapist" or "Clinician". Requires completion of an approved clinical program with a Bachelor's degree, Master's degree, or Doctoral degree. This level requires certification, licensure, or registration within the clinical discipline. Social Worker ‐ Advanced Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information LICENSED CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER (LCSW) ‐ 002585 1 $68,182 $68,182 $67,252 $72,758 $79,503 $67,941 $73,999 Provides clinical social work services to patients and their families. Counsels and provides crisis intervention for patients, including assessment and treatment of emotional and behavioral problems. Coaches patients on how to manage ongoing health conditions and provides therapy to help patients make positive behavior changes. Requires a master's degree of social work (MSW). Typically reports to the head of a unit/department. Requires a state license to practice clinical social work. Years of experience may be unspecified. Certification and/or licensing in the position's specialty is the main requirement. Under the general administrative direction of the Social Work Manager of the Police Department, incumbent provides immediate crisis intervention and clinical case management services to citizens and/or their families, along with assistance to prevent the intersection or further intersection with the criminal justice system. These citizens and/or their families may have the following problems: homelessness, substance abuse/dependence, mental and/or chronic health illnesses, domestic violence, employment issues, poverty, being a victim of crime, and access to other basic necessities. Incumbent must be willing to work closely with the entire team of the Salt Lake City Police Department, engage with external service providers on a regular basis and have the ability and skills necessary to work with the general public in a positive, friendly, and professional manner. Master’s Degree in Social Work or Mental Health Counseling from an accredited college/university. Current Licensure with the State of Utah as a Licensed Clinical Social Worker, Clinical Mental Health Counselor, Certified Social Worker, Associate Clinical Mental Health Counselor, Certified Social Worker Intern or the ability to obtain a state licensure within 6 months of the hire date. $81,141 Licensed Clinical Social Worker Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Licensed Clinical Social Worker Administers social service programs, and provides clinical social work services to clients or patients and their families. Counsels and provides crisis intervention for clients, including assessment and treatment of emotional and behavioral problems. Coaches clients on how to manage ongoing mental health conditions, and provides therapy to help them make positive behavior changes. Aids clients, including individuals, families, or groups, easing them through transitions, hardships, and mentally hard times. Researches and assists them in finding the proper resources to get the care they need to sustain a certain quality of life. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$61,257 $67,225 $73,331 $62,698 $68,826 $75,104 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$63,741 $69,991 $76,362 $65,240 $71,657 $78,208 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$69,975 $78,320 $86,778 $71,919 $80,489 $89,189 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$72,863 $81,552 $90,324 $74,887 $83,811 $92,833 Overall 100%$66,959 $74,272 $81,699 $68,686 $76,196 $83,834 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$64,700 $74,900 $83,200 $67,400 $77,800 $88,600 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$67,200 $77,900 $86,500 $70,100 $80,900 $92,200 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$62,700 $72,700 $80,700 $65,400 $75,400 $86,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$65,200 $75,600 $83,900 $68,000 $78,500 $89,400 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$64,400 $74,600 $82,900 $67,100 $77,500 $88,300 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$67,000 $77,600 $86,200 $69,800 $80,500 $91,800 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$62,500 $72,400 $80,400 $65,100 $75,100 $85,600 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$65,000 $75,300 $83,600 $67,700 $78,100 $89,100 Overall 100%$64,838 $75,125 $83,425 $67,575 $77,975 $88,875 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah | All Industries 25.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | All Industries 25.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Sector/Government 25.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, All Industries 25.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 25.0%$55,692 $69,054 $77,010 $55,692 $69,054 $77,010 Utah | All 25.0%$55,692 $69,054 $77,010 $55,692 $69,054 $77,010 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 25.0%$70,584 $73,848 $76,092 $70,584 $73,848 $76,092 Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 25.0%$70,584 $73,848 $76,092 $70,584 $73,848 $76,092 SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$63,138 $71,451 $76,551 $63,138 $71,451 $76,551 Survey Information CompData Business Analyst I Assesses and documents business requirements, makes priority recommendations, and advises on business options, risks, and costs. Reviews, analyzes, and evaluates business and user needs and documents findings. Reviews and recommends changes to business processes to increase system effectiveness for end users. Bachelor's degree required and two years experience. Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale No Data Available Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information MANAGEMENT ANALYST ‐ 001092 3 $64,716 $65,062 Develops, implements, and administers programs that evaluate, measure, and improve employee performance. Conducts assessment activities to evaluate and identify the current and emerging skills, competencies, and behaviors required to achieve desired organizational results and prepare for future needs. Designs performance management strategies and processes that measure outcomes, identify areas for improvement, and align teams to organizational goals. Identifies the types of training and development and resources needed to achieve workforce performance improvements. Encourages a culture of objective setting and result measurement aligned to pay and rewards using tools, training, and communication. Requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Occasionally directed in several aspects of the work. Gaining exposure to some of the complex tasks within the job function. Typically requires 2 ‐4 years of related experience. Manages department programs and initiatives that involve extensive research and preparing reports to present to various stakeholders. Advances new initiatives from the department, as well as independently manages and coordinates complex, multi‐agency implementation of large‐scale, long‐term, department/division administrative programs. Exercises discretion and independent judgment regarding matters of significance. Provides input, facilitates change, and implements programs to enhance division efficiency and effectiveness. Bachelor’s degree in Public Administration, Political Science, Business Administration, or a closely related field plus four (4) years of paid professional experience in project coordination, administrative support, policy initiatives development, research methods, and reporting techniques. Education may be substituted for the experience requirements. Preference will be given to candidates with public sector experience. $64,978 $73,616 $80,558 $66,466 $75,207 $83,087 People Performance Management Specialist II Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Management Analyst Analyzes business or operating procedures to devise most efficient methods of accomplishing work. Plans study of work problems and procedures, such as organizational change, communications, information flow, integrated production methods, inventory control, or cost analysis. Collects and organizes information on problem or procedures including present operating procedures. Analyzes data gathered, develops information and considers available solutions or alternate methods of proceeding. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$80,816 $88,980 $97,225 $84,025 $92,547 $101,170 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$86,638 $95,368 $104,139 $90,078 $99,191 $108,365 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$96,046 $106,918 $117,687 $100,388 $111,740 $123,007 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$102,888 $114,384 $125,670 $107,539 $119,543 $131,351 Overall 100%$91,597 $101,413 $111,180 $95,508 $105,755 $115,973 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$78,300 $88,300 $100,100 $80,300 $90,100 $102,100 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$78,600 $88,700 $100,500 $80,600 $90,400 $102,500 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$72,600 $81,900 $92,900 $74,500 $83,600 $94,800 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$72,900 $82,300 $93,300 $74,800 $83,900 $95,200 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$77,900 $87,900 $99,700 $79,900 $89,700 $101,700 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$78,300 $88,300 $100,100 $80,300 $90,100 $102,100 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$72,300 $81,600 $92,500 $74,200 $83,200 $94,400 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$72,600 $82,000 $92,900 $74,500 $83,600 $94,800 Overall 100%$75,438 $85,125 $96,500 $77,388 $86,825 $98,450 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah | All Industries 25.0%$79,580 $89,239 $98,480 $79,728 $89,686 $99,789 Salt Lake City | All Industries 25.0%$79,976 $89,683 $98,970 $80,125 $90,133 $100,286 Salt Lake City | Public Sector/Government 25.0%$85,413 $95,164 $105,557 $87,075 $98,077 $108,894 25.0%$91,125 $104,142 $114,419 $91,125 $104,142 $114,419 Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, All Industries 0.0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Overall 100%$84,024 $94,557 $104,357 $84,513 $95,510 $105,847 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Network Engineer II $106,757 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Network Engineer Plans, designs, and evaluates new and existing computer network systems and services, including local area networks, wide area networks, intranets, and the Internet, providing analytical, technical, and administrative support. Plans, oversees, develops, and implements network policies and procedures and ensures network integrity as maintenance and modification projects to existing applications are undertaken. Economic Research Institute $83,686 $93,698 $104,012 $85,803 $96,030 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Test and document system behavior, performance, and security. Providing tier 4 support and network disaster recovery expertise. Plan, design, and troubleshoot local and wide area network infrastructure, including routers, firewalls , switches, gateways, DNS servers, DHCP servers, clustering solutions, and related hardware, software, and services. Network Engineering; Fully applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency solving problems of moderate complexity. Contributes to completion of projects and programs in area of expertise. May interface with internal and/or external customers and provide guidance to non‐exempts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Network Engineer ‐ Intermediate Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information NETWORK ENGINEER II ‐ 002576 1 $91,666 $91,666 Installs, maintains and evaluates network systems and communications. Troubleshoots the network issues with diverse scope. Assists network architecture design, feasibility and cost studies. Must have extensive knowledge of Internet, computer, routers, switches, firewall, etc. Typically requires a bachelor's degree of computer science, or engineering or its equivalent. Typically reports to a manager. Gains exposure to some of the complex tasks within the job function. Occasionally directed in several aspects of the work. Typically requires 2 to 4 years of related experience. Under the guidance of the CISO/Director ITS and the Cybersecurity Engineering Manager, The Network Engineering role is to ensure the stability and integrity of voice, data, video, and wireless network services. This is achieved by planning, designing, and developing local area networks (LANs) and wide area networks (WANs) across the City infrastructure. In addition, the Network Engineer will participate with the installation, monitoring, maintenance, support, and optimization of all network hardware, software, and communication links. This individual will also analyze and resolve network hardware and software problems in a timely and accurate fashion and provide training and mentoring where required to the Network Engineering Team. Network Engineer II – Graduation from a four‐year accredited college with a bachelor’s degree in computer science or related field plus 4‐6 years related experience in the administration of a network with multiple LANs and WANs. Equivalent combination of education and experience substituted on a year‐for‐year basis. Possession of one (or more) of the following certifications may be required: Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA), or CompTIA Network+ Knowledge of routing and switching design principles, best practices, and related technologies, including routers, switches (layer 2/3), remote access, DNS, VLAN, QoS, DSL, SIP and Metro Ethernet. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$48,979 $53,081 $57,025 $50,808 $54,291 $58,350 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$52,284 $56,725 $60,995 $53,459 $58,018 $62,412 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$52,700 $58,236 $63,585 $54,174 $59,847 $65,363 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$56,313 $62,305 $68,090 $57,888 $64,040 $69,994 Overall 100%$52,569 $57,587 $62,424 $54,082 $59,049 $64,030 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$64,900 $74,900 $89,000 $65,900 $76,200 $91,000 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$65,700 $75,900 $90,200 $66,800 $77,200 $92,200 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$58,400 $67,500 $80,200 $59,300 $68,600 $82,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$59,200 $68,400 $81,200 $60,100 $69,500 $83,000 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$64,600 $74,600 $88,700 $65,600 $75,800 $90,600 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$65,400 $75,600 $89,800 $66,500 $76,800 $91,800 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$58,200 $67,200 $79,800 $59,100 $68,300 $81,600 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$58,900 $68,100 $80,900 $59,900 $69,200 $82,700 Overall 100%$61,913 $71,525 $84,975 $62,900 $72,700 $86,863 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 25.0%$64,702 $76,684 $84,710 $64,702 $76,695 $85,591 Salt Lake Metro 25.0%$65,024 $77,065 $85,131 $65,024 $77,077 $86,017 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 25.0%$70,383 $76,216 $86,194 $70,383 $76,216 $87,308 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 25.0%$69,111 $76,216 $86,128 $69,763 $76,216 $86,128 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$67,305 $76,545 $85,541 $67,468 $76,551 $86,261 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 16.7%$60,690 $76,296 $87,108 $60,690 $76,296 $90,882 Utah | All 16.7%$60,690 $76,296 $87,108 $60,690 $76,296 $90,882 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 16.7%$61,098 $73,644 $77,622 $61,098 $73,644 $77,622 Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 16.7%$61,098 $73,644 $77,622 $61,098 $73,644 $77,622 SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 16.7%$57,120 $62,730 $73,644 $57,120 $62,730 $73,644 Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 16.7%$57,120 $62,730 $73,644 $57,120 $62,730 $73,644 SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$59,648 $70,904 $79,474 $59,648 $70,904 $80,732 Survey Information CompData Network Administrator Monitors the status of the network to ensure that all devices are working properly. Administers e‐mail system. Evaluates network performance to maintain standards and corrects as necessary. Installs upgrades, receives calls pertaining to network problems and either corrects the problem or directs user to the appropriate area for resolution. Provides tape backup. Maintains network security including registering users and installing firewalls. Bachelor's degree required or equivalent experience. Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Test and document system behavior, performance, and security. Providing tier 4 support and network disaster recovery expertise. Plan, design, and troubleshoot local and wide area network infrastructure, including routers, firewalls , switches, gateways, DNS servers, DHCP servers, clustering solutions, and related hardware, software, and services. Network Engineering; Fully applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency solving problems of moderate complexity. Contributes to completion of projects and programs in area of expertise. May interface with internal and/or external customers and provide guidance to non‐exempts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Network Engineer ‐ Intermediate Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information NETWORK SUPPORT ADMINISTRATOR II ‐ 001396 7 $62,139 $61,942 Supports, monitors, tests, and troubleshoots hardware and software problems pertaining to LAN. Recommends and schedules repairs. Provides end users support for all LAN‐ based applications. Installs and configures workstations. May require a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a project leader or manager. Occasionally directed in several aspects of the work. Gaining exposure to some of the complex tasks within the job function. Typically requires 2 ‐4 years of related experience. Under the guidance of the Network Support Team Manager, the Network Support Administrator II coordinates and completes tasks pertaining to supporting customers that use City computer, phone, and data network resources. This includes planning, coordinating, installing, configuring and maintaining networked desktop computers, laptops, mobile devices, printers, phones, data equipment, and software for City departments. Responsibilities will also include providing onsite technical support at off‐site buildings, working with the Software Support Team and the Software Engineering Team regarding software and application issues, working with the Network System Engineer Team in resolving issues involving network connectivity, throughput, and overall LAN performance, and mentoring and training Network Support Team I Administrators. Various work schedules may be required to accommodate the hours that the Help Desk and onsite technical support staff are available for City customers. Occasional weekend work and on‐call work may be required. Bachelor's degree in Computer Science, Engineering, or related field and four (4) years experience in supporting PCs (using Windows OS) and LAN administration or an equivalent combination of education and experience substituted on a year‐for‐year basis. $60,359 $69,140 $78,103 $61,025 $69,801 $79,471 LAN Support II Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Technical Support Engineer Provides technical support for users of company products, including current and prospective clients, resellers, and professional product testing organizations. Researches, replicates, diagnoses, troubleshoots, and identifies solutions to resolve technical company product and system issues. Installs, configures, and fine‐tunes the company's product. Provides detailed documentation of all technical issues within call tracking database. Collaborates with quality assurance and development teams on understanding of issues and steps needed to resolve them. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$79,493 $87,507 $95,608 $82,867 $91,257 $99,755 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$82,471 $90,773 $99,132 $85,971 $94,662 $103,432 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$94,466 $105,169 $115,818 $99,029 $110,238 $121,413 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$97,955 $108,962 $119,869 $102,687 $114,214 $125,660 Overall 100%$88,596 $98,103 $107,607 $92,639 $102,593 $112,565 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$110,100 $121,800 $134,600 $114,500 $129,600 $144,800 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$112,800 $124,800 $137,900 $117,400 $132,800 $148,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$104,300 $115,400 $127,500 $108,500 $122,700 $137,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$106,800 $118,200 $130,600 $111,100 $125,800 $140,500 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$109,800 $121,500 $134,300 $114,200 $129,300 $144,400 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$112,500 $124,500 $137,600 $117,100 $132,500 $148,000 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$104,000 $115,100 $127,100 $108,200 $122,400 $136,700 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$106,600 $117,900 $130,300 $110,800 $125,500 $140,100 Overall 100%$108,363 $119,900 $132,488 $112,725 $127,575 $142,488 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$105,551 $114,906 $132,216 $105,551 $116,473 $133,828 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$106,077 $115,478 $132,875 $106,077 $117,053 $134,494 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$105,814 $115,192 $132,546 $105,814 $116,763 $134,161 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Review logical and physical designs, physical resources, and space allocation. Report on service delivery, product development and delivery, uptime, and other metrics. Develop and manage department budget. Hire, mentor, and lead technical teams to achieve organizational objectives. Network Engineering; Broadly applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Solves a diverse range of complex problems, working with limited direction. Frequently interfaces with internal/external customers and makes significant contributions to department goals and planning efforts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5‐7 years of related professional experience. Network Engineering Management ‐ Senior/Career Level Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information NETWORK SYSTEMS ENGINEER III ‐ 001404 3 $101,525 $101,483 Plans and designs an organization's systems infrastructure, including the implementation and design of hardware and software. Analyzes, develops, modifies, tests and maintains the system. Verifies and validates systems and meets internal and external requirements. Diagnoses problems and provides recommendations for improvement on existing and new systems. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or its equivalent. Typically reports to a manager. A specialist on complex technical and business matters. Work is highly independent. May assume a team lead role for the work group. Typically requires 7+ years of related experience. Under the guidance of the Operations Manager or the Network Engineering Team Manager, oversees all activities of the citywide data and communications networks. At the highest level, investigates solutions to complicated and advanced interoperability problems to obtain operation across all platforms including; E‐mail, file transfers, network infrastructure, unified communications and high speed wireless. Acts as the technical project leader or provides work leadership for lower level employees. This is the highest individual contributor level within the network team and is ultimately responsible to find solutions to complex issues. Incumbents are normally widely recognized for their achievements, technical expertise and meritorious standing within their professional field. Responsibilities include mentoring, training, and supervising Network Systems Engineer I and II positions. Bachelors Degree in Computer Science or related field plus 12 years related experience in the administration of a network with multiple LANs and WANs. Equivalent combination of education and experience substituted on a year‐for‐year basis. $100,924 $111,065 $124,213 $103,726 $115,644 $129,738 Systems Engineer IV Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Systems Engineer Oversees engineering activities of an organization's information systems. Plans, designs, develops, evaluates, tests, and integrates an organization's systems infrastructure, including the implementation and design of hardware and software. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$39,996 $44,065 $47,819 $40,768 $44,915 $48,750 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$41,695 $45,917 $49,852 $42,500 $46,803 $50,822 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$41,464 $45,854 $49,921 $42,301 $46,776 $50,930 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$43,210 $47,790 $52,062 $44,083 $48,750 $53,114 Overall 100%$41,591 $45,907 $49,914 $42,413 $46,811 $50,904 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$62,300 $70,100 $79,300 $64,800 $73,300 $83,700 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$63,800 $71,700 $81,200 $66,300 $75,000 $85,700 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$55,100 $62,000 $70,200 $57,300 $64,800 $74,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$56,400 $63,500 $71,900 $58,700 $66,400 $75,800 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$50,500 $56,800 $64,300 $52,500 $59,400 $67,800 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$51,700 $58,100 $65,800 $53,800 $60,800 $69,400 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$44,700 $50,300 $56,900 $46,500 $52,500 $60,000 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$45,700 $51,500 $58,200 $47,600 $53,800 $61,400 Overall 100%$53,775 $60,500 $68,475 $55,938 $63,250 $72,225 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$40,454 $46,529 $53,262 $40,575 $46,638 $53,537 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$42,248 $48,592 $55,623 $42,374 $48,705 $55,910 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$41,351 $47,561 $54,443 $41,475 $47,672 $54,724 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$44,778 $54,264 $60,078 $44,778 $54,264 $60,078 Utah | All 50.0%$44,778 $54,264 $60,078 $44,778 $54,264 $60,078 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$44,778 $54,264 $60,078 $44,778 $54,264 $60,078 Survey Information CompData Office Manager I Supervises office activities such as filing, dictating, record retention, duplication, keyboarding, faxing, and mail distribution. Monitors the use of office supplies and equipment. Ensures that office procedures and policies are followed. Possesses complete knowledge of office procedures. High school education or equivalent required and three years experience. Office Administrative Resources Supervisor $59,483 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Administrative Assistant Supports an organization or department by performing administrative services. Assists management with administrative tasks such as tracking and compiling information of interest. Prepares various reports detailing the administrative information handled by the position. Reads and answers correspondence. Economic Research Institute $45,374 $52,058 $58,227 $46,151 $52,999 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Coordinate space and office organization; maintaining paper and electronic les. Greet visitors and callers, route and resolve information requests. Type correspondence, compile data for expense and statistical reports. Schedule travel, appointments and meetings. Administrative Assistant / Secretary (Non‐Executive); Fully competent at performing support tasks and responsibilities in functional area. May provide direction to lower‐level support employees. Receives general supervision. Typically requires: High School diploma or GED, at least 2 years of related experience, knowledge of company and department procedures, tact in communications, pro efficiency with related systems. Administrative Assistant ‐ Skilled Administrative Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information OFFICE FACILITATOR II (OFFICE MANAGER) ‐ 001232 30 $51,451 $51,334 Supervises the daily operation of one or more support services for an organization, including clerical services, office space, equipment and supplies, vendor management and other support services. Establishes work procedures and standards to improve efficiency and effectiveness of assigned operations. Ensures compliance with established corporate standards and may be responsible for reviewing and evaluating the work and performance of subordinates. May require an associate degree. Typically reports to a manager. Supervises a group of primarily para‐professional level staffs. May also be a level above a supervisor within high volume administrative/ production environments. Makes day‐to‐day decisions within or for a group/small department. Has some authority for personnel actions. Thorough knowledge of department processes. Typically requires 3‐5 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. Independently provides administrative and secretarial support to division or work unit. Researches complex topics, policies and practices as needed to facilitate operational goals. Advises team leaders and others on developments which are important to or may impact division. Prepares payroll, collects data, exchanges information, answers phone, greets and screens visitors. Relieves management of administrative routine by handling such items as minor purchasing, inventory, petty cash, travel, and meeting arrangements and schedules. Graduation from high school or equivalent and six years’ experience related to project management, data management and office support, including two years experience in research or accounting/bookkeeping, data collection, analysis and presentation prepared on spreadsheet software. Successful completion of post‐high school study in related subjects may be substituted for experience on a year‐for‐year basis. Related subjects may include but are not limited to: Office or business administration, public administration, finance, accounting, economics, business writing, computer science, and community or public relations. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$51,326 $56,023 $60,667 $52,407 $57,220 $61,988 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$53,512 $58,475 $63,384 $54,639 $59,725 $64,763 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$56,194 $62,557 $68,880 $57,644 $64,165 $70,657 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$58,656 $65,380 $72,046 $60,169 $67,060 $73,905 Overall 100%$54,922 $60,609 $66,244 $56,215 $62,043 $67,828 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$58,700 $66,200 $74,800 $60,800 $69,000 $78,500 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$59,500 $67,000 $75,800 $61,600 $69,900 $79,500 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$52,800 $59,500 $67,300 $54,700 $62,100 $70,600 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$53,500 $60,300 $68,200 $55,400 $62,900 $71,500 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$58,500 $66,000 $74,600 $60,600 $68,800 $78,300 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$59,300 $66,800 $75,600 $61,400 $69,700 $79,300 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$52,600 $59,400 $67,100 $54,500 $61,900 $70,400 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$53,300 $60,100 $68,000 $55,200 $62,700 $71,300 Overall 100%$56,025 $63,163 $71,425 $58,025 $65,875 $74,925 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$56,778 $63,784 $71,553 $57,498 $64,653 $72,434 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%$56,299 $63,246 $70,950 $57,013 $64,107 $71,824 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 33.0%$52,650 $54,169 $60,896 $52,650 $55,688 $61,436 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$55,253 $60,428 $67,831 $55,733 $61,509 $68,597 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Paralegal II $70,450 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Paralegal Checks and examines law sources such as statutes, recorded judicial decisions, legal articles, treaties, constitutions, and legal codes to prepare legal documents, such as briefs, pleadings, appeals, wills, contracts, initial and amended articles of incorporation, stock certificates and other securities, buy‐sell agreements, closing papers and binders, deeds, and trust instruments for review, approval, and use by Attorney. Assesses and inventories real and personal property for estate planning. Investigates facts and law of case to determine causes of action and to prepare case accordingly. Economic Research Institute $55,400 $61,400 $68,500 $56,658 $63,142 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Gather and analyze research data, such as statutes, decisions and legal articles, codes and documents. Investigate facts and law of cases to determine causes of action and to prepare cases. Call upon witnesses to testify at hearing. Direct and coordinate law office activity, including delivery of subpoenas. Prepare a davits or other documents, maintain document le and le pleadings with court clerk. Prepare legal documents, including briefs, pleadings, appeals, wills, contracts and real estate closing statements. Assist lawyers by researching legal precedent, investigating facts or preparing legal documents. Legal Assistant/Paralegal; Performs a range of case/matter‐related duties, including drafting correspondence and other basic documentation, research, compilation, and summarization of data. Depends on others for instruction, guidance, and direction. Typically an entry‐level role requiring 0 ‐ 2 years of experience. Typically requires: college degree in paralegal studies. Paralegal Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information PARALEGAL ‐ 002201 6 $60,871 $60,746 Assists and supports attorneys with research for trail or due diligence. Researches and analyzes law sources such as statutes, recorded judicial decisions, legal articles, treaties, constitutions, and legal codes. Prepares legal documents, such as briefs, pleadings, appeals, wills, contracts, etc. Understands technical legal terminology. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or its equivalent. Typically reports to an attorney. Typically requires paralegal certification. Gains exposure to some of the complex tasks within the job function. Occasionally directed in several aspects of the work. Typically requires 2 to 4 years of related experience. Works for the City Attorney or City Prosecutor and, as assigned under the direct supervision of individual City Attorneys or City Prosecutors, determines the factual and analytical research necessary to carry out assignments related to numerous, simultaneously occurring cases. Work includes determining which legal references and resources to use as well as scope of research, the design of interview questions and which witnesses to interview, how to independently organize evidence and prepare exhibits, analyze and summarize facts, prepare, review and update trial folders as well as prepare and control legal documents for the City Attorney’s Office and City Prosecutor’s Office as a whole. This is a professional position requiring independent judgment, a thorough knowledge of legal processes and litigation procedures, legal research methods and the ability to perform and track numerous, simultaneous tasks. High School graduation or GED equivalent plus a certificate of Paralegal studies from an accredited institution or the ability to obtain within six months of hire, and four years, full‐time paid paralegal experience and/or experience working in a law firm performing similar duties, including preparation and assistance in litigation procedures and substantive areas of the law. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$74,363 $81,848 $89,443 $77,322 $85,136 $93,080 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$78,173 $85,962 $93,834 $81,284 $89,415 $97,649 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$88,332 $98,437 $108,598 $92,334 $102,887 $113,518 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$92,684 $103,126 $113,592 $96,883 $107,787 $118,738 Overall 100%$83,388 $92,343 $101,367 $86,956 $96,306 $105,746 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$90,800 $103,500 $118,600 $95,100 $110,300 $127,800 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$92,500 $105,500 $120,800 $96,900 $112,400 $130,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$85,300 $97,200 $111,400 $89,300 $103,600 $120,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$86,900 $99,100 $113,500 $91,000 $105,600 $122,400 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$90,400 $103,000 $118,100 $94,700 $109,800 $127,300 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$92,100 $105,000 $120,300 $96,500 $111,900 $129,700 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$84,900 $96,800 $110,900 $89,000 $103,200 $119,600 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$86,600 $98,700 $113,100 $90,700 $105,100 $121,900 Overall 100%$88,688 $101,100 $115,838 $92,900 $107,738 $124,888 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$92,310 $104,336 $123,856 $93,673 $108,092 $130,326 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%$96,401 $108,960 $129,346 $97,826 $112,884 $136,102 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 33.0%$95,113 $101,646 $121,816 $95,113 $102,912 $123,407 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$94,626 $105,020 $125,049 $95,560 $108,012 $130,007 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$84,558 $90,678 $102,510 $86,394 $96,288 $106,794 Utah | All 50.0%$85,986 $90,882 $105,876 $87,312 $96,900 $107,202 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$85,272 $90,780 $104,193 $86,853 $96,594 $106,998 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Manage the daily operations of the payroll group. Maintain, direct and calculate the entry of data. Ensure accuracy and timely completion of the payroll records. Create audit reports to verify the accuracy of the payroll run. Payroll; Manages Professional employees and/or Supervisors. Has budget, deadline responsibility in the area managed. Typically responsible for the day‐to‐day management of one functional area. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5+ years of related professional experience, 1+ years supervisory experience. Payroll Management ‐ 1st Level Manager Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information Payroll and Accounting Manager ‐ 002597 1 $87,360 $87,360 Responsible for managing payroll processing operations. Establishes policies and processes that ensure accurate calculation of wages, tax withholdings, and company deductions. Interfaces between finance and human resource departments to provide accurate and useful information. Develops and produces payroll‐related statistical reports. Ensures accurate and on‐time governmental reporting and compliance. Oversees the activities and training of both professionals and support staff. Directs the resolution of complex issues or errors. Requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a director. Manages subordinate staff in the day‐to‐day performance of their jobs. True first level manager. Ensures that project/department milestones/goals are met and adhering to approved budgets. Has full authority for personnel actions. Typically requires 5 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. 1 ‐ 3 years supervisory experience may be required. Extensive knowledge of the function and department processes. Manages payroll operations in compliance with all federal, state and local regulations, accounting and financial management standards, internal reporting, policies and procedures while assuring accurate and Ɵmely employee pay checks. Bachelor’s degree in accounƟng or a closely related ﬁeld plus four years payroll processing and bookkeeping experience. Experience may be substituted for education on a year‐for‐year basis. $87,993 $97,311 $111,612 $90,567 $102,162 $116,910 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Payroll Manager Manages payroll staff and payroll systems at one or more locations. Reviews personnel records to determine names, rates of pay, occupations of new hires, and changes in wage rates and occupations of employees on payroll. Directs computation of differential pay according to company policy. Oversees compilation and preparation of other payroll data such as pension, insurance, bond purchases, and credit union payments. Economic Research Institute Survey Information CompData Accounting Manager Manages the general accounting functions and accounting staff. Maintains compliance with generally accepted accounting procedures (GAAP). Ensures the accurate and timely general ledger and period‐end closings. Prepares or supervises the preparation of balance sheets, profit‐and‐loss statements, data forecasts, cash flow data, and other reports. Reconciles assets and liabilities. Conducts asset valuations and participate in budget planning process as needed. Bachelor's degree in accounting or finance required and six years experience. Payroll Manager Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$55,760 $60,957 $66,120 $57,873 $63,299 $68,706 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$58,031 $63,610 $69,122 $60,230 $66,054 $71,826 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$61,603 $68,667 $75,731 $64,441 $71,819 $79,219 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$64,302 $71,824 $79,239 $67,264 $75,121 $82,889 Overall 100%$59,924 $66,265 $72,553 $62,452 $69,073 $75,660 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$61,000 $72,500 $82,600 $63,600 $76,800 $87,600 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$61,400 $73,000 $83,100 $64,000 $77,200 $88,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$58,000 $69,000 $78,500 $60,500 $73,000 $83,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$58,400 $69,400 $79,000 $60,800 $73,500 $83,800 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$60,800 $72,200 $82,200 $63,300 $76,400 $87,200 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$61,100 $72,600 $82,700 $63,700 $76,900 $87,800 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$57,800 $68,700 $78,200 $60,200 $72,700 $83,000 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$58,100 $69,100 $78,700 $60,600 $73,100 $83,500 Overall 100%$59,575 $70,813 $80,625 $62,088 $74,950 $85,538 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$55,852 $65,451 $74,451 $56,343 $66,326 $75,746 Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 50.0%$49,627 $56,373 $64,253 $49,670 $56,878 $64,253 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$52,739 $60,912 $69,352 $53,006 $61,602 $69,999 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 16.7%$56,712 $64,056 $70,380 $56,712 $65,178 $70,380 Utah | All 16.7%$56,304 $64,566 $71,298 $56,304 $65,382 $71,298 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 16.7%$49,878 $54,978 $63,240 $49,878 $54,978 $63,240 Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 16.7%$49,878 $54,978 $63,240 $49,878 $54,978 $63,240 SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 16.7%$54,468 $59,160 $65,892 $54,468 $59,160 $65,892 Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 16.7%$54,468 $59,160 $65,892 $54,468 $59,160 $65,892 Overall 100%$53,629 $59,495 $66,670 $53,629 $59,818 $66,670 Survey Information CompData Buyer I Acquires materials, supplies, and services and places purchase orders for goods that have standard costs and quoted discounts already in place. Assesses requisitions and proposals from vendors to negotiate contracts. Reviews opportunities for new supply sources and suitability of materials offered. Retains records pertaining to cost, delivery, performance, and inventory levels. Bachelor's degree preferred and three years experience. Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Inspect deliveries for shipping errors, improper handling, or quality issues. Ensure that orders are delivered on time and at cost. Resolve billing and shipping problems and provide information to suppliers. Identify suppliers, select merchandise and negotiate bills of sale for a business. Purchasing / Procurement / Buyer; Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency in the primary duties of the job family. Plays a key role in Implementing projects and programs in the function. Acts as a resource to managers and employees in the organization. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Buyer ‐ Intermediate Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST I ‐ 000533 2 $61,558 $61,558 Purchases commodities for use in manufacturing and other business applications. Monitors and analyzes the commodities market and overall economic conditions to ensure that commodities are purchased at competitive prices. Participates in contract negotiations and ensures that orders include correct quantities and comply with quality standards. Requires a bachelor's degree in area of specialty. Requires technical and purchasing expertise on assigned commodities. Typically reports to a manager. Typically requires 2 to 4 years of related experience. Gains exposure to some of the complex tasks within the job function. Occasionally directed in several aspects of the work. Under general direction of an Authorized Procurement Official, administers competitive solicitations and contracts for materials, supplies and services, or construction for various City departments. If assigned to the Purchasing Division, learns to administer the internal computer purchasing system, web site, intranet and other technology and equipment. Has decision making authority on expenditures up to $40,000 (involving single purchasing decision). This is a professional‐level position that requires expertise in specialized contract procurement work. This position requires a high‐level of independent judgment, analytical skill, and decision‐making. This position typically works in the Purchasing Division buy may also be located in the Engineering Division and perform construction‐specific procurement duties. Degree in economics, finance, business administration or a related field, and a combination of four (4) year’s recent paid experience in purchasing, contracts, and associated procurement software programs, preferably in a government agency. Experience may be substituted for education one for the other on a year‐for‐year basis for a total of eight years. $56,467 $64,371 $72,300 $57,794 $66,361 $74,467 Materials Procurement Buyer II Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Procurement Specialist Procures quality goods or services at an acceptable price that meets an organization's needs, and assures those needs are met in a timely manner. Develops positive relationships with vendors and suppliers, reviews costs, negotiates to get the lowest possible prices, resolves price disputes, and recommends where and how much material and supplies to buy. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$52,504 $57,060 $61,492 $53,245 $57,877 $62,388 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$53,923 $58,577 $63,125 $54,685 $59,415 $64,044 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$57,645 $63,836 $69,899 $58,640 $64,934 $71,106 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$59,176 $65,540 $71,828 $60,198 $66,668 $73,068 Overall 100%$55,812 $61,253 $66,586 $56,692 $62,224 $67,652 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$55,100 $63,900 $74,800 $55,900 $65,000 $76,500 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$56,400 $65,400 $76,500 $57,200 $66,500 $78,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$51,300 $59,500 $69,600 $52,000 $60,500 $71,200 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$52,500 $60,900 $71,200 $53,200 $61,900 $72,900 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$54,900 $63,700 $74,400 $55,600 $64,700 $76,100 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$56,200 $65,200 $76,200 $57,000 $66,200 $77,900 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$51,100 $59,200 $69,300 $51,800 $60,200 $70,900 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$52,300 $60,600 $70,900 $53,000 $61,600 $72,500 Overall 100%$53,725 $62,300 $72,863 $54,463 $63,325 $74,538 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale No Data Available Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ‐ 001890 1 $71,739 $71,739 Surveys and investigates land surfaces to project precise measurement and location of lines, angles, points, areas, and elevations. Performs project research, boundary calculations, and records accuracy of survey data, notes, and sketches. May require a high school diploma or its equivalent. May have to complete an apprenticeship, and/or formal training in area of specialty. Typically reports to a supervisor/manager. Typically requires 5‐7 years of related experience. Has gained full proficiency in a broad range of activities related to the job. Independently performs a wide range of complex duties under general guidance from supervisors. Reporting to the City Surveyor and/or Engineering GIS Manager, incumbent performs Professional Land Surveyor field and office duties, assists with the development of the City’s Geographic Information System (GIS), and works with other City officials and staff, other governmental agencies, private surveyors and the public to resolve survey issues and provide support coordinating projects. This is a position requiring proficiency in Global Positioning Systems, AutoCAD, Geographic Information Systems, as well as technical competency in a variety of engineering and surveying functions. Associates degree in Land Surveying, Pre‐Engineering, or a related field and four (4) years paid experience in Land Surveying, two (2) of which must be in computer operations related to Land Surveying, including geodetic surveys, state plane coordinate systems, advanced coordinate adjustments, an operation of GPS associated equipment. Education and experience may be substituted on year for year basis, but must include a minimum of four (4) years of Land Surveying utilizing the specific technologies and equipment currently required. $54,769 $61,777 $69,724 $55,577 $62,774 $71,095 Land Surveyor III Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Land Surveyor Establishes official land, air space, and water boundaries by surveying. Provides data relevant to size, shape, contour, location, elevation, or dimensions of land or land features. Plans, oversees, or conducts surveys of land areas using special high‐accuracy techniques, including astronomical observations and complex computations. Writes descriptions of land for deeds, leases, and other legal documents. Requires license in land surveying. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$59,538 $65,338 $71,261 $61,631 $67,662 $73,835 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$62,736 $68,809 $74,935 $64,941 $71,256 $77,641 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$68,160 $76,241 $84,425 $70,984 $79,390 $87,922 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$71,736 $80,038 $88,365 $74,708 $83,344 $92,026 Overall 100%$65,543 $72,607 $79,747 $68,066 $75,413 $82,856 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$83,100 $95,700 $110,100 $84,000 $98,800 $112,600 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$92,900 $107,000 $123,000 $93,900 $110,400 $125,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$75,900 $87,400 $100,500 $76,700 $90,200 $102,800 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$84,800 $97,700 $112,300 $85,700 $100,800 $114,900 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$82,800 $95,400 $109,700 $83,700 $98,400 $112,200 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$92,600 $106,600 $122,600 $93,500 $110,000 $125,400 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$75,600 $87,100 $100,100 $76,400 $89,800 $102,400 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$84,500 $97,300 $111,900 $85,400 $100,400 $114,400 Overall 100%$84,025 $96,775 $111,275 $84,913 $99,850 $113,825 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$90,323 $99,621 $118,581 $91,170 $99,906 $125,862 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$84,886 $93,624 $111,443 $85,682 $93,892 $118,285 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$87,605 $96,623 $115,012 $88,426 $96,899 $122,074 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Property Manager $106,252 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Property Manager Controls commercial, industrial, or residential real estate properties within organization or for external clients. Discusses terms and conditions for providing management services with client. Composes agreement stipulating extent and scope of management responsibilities, services to be performed, and costs for services. Employs, via hiring or contracting for services, security, maintenance, and groundskeeping personnel and on‐site management personnel, if required. Prepares lease or rental agreements for lessees and collects specified rents and impounds. Economic Research Institute $79,057 $88,668 $102,011 $80,468 $90,721 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Supervise on‐site staff and coordinates repairs and maintenance. Process leases, collect rent, make bank deposits, verify income and maintain waiting list. Ensure compliance with HUD, TCAC or other regulations. Process evictions. Property Administration / Management; Gives direction to 1st Level Managers and high‐level Professionals. May manage day‐to‐day operations of multiple functional areas. Directs and oversees implementation of large programs and projects. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree (Master's preferred), 7+ years of related professional experience, 3+ years managing specific area. Property Manager ‐ 2nd Level Manager Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information REAL PROPERTY MANAGER ‐ 000369 1 $91,666 $91,666 Maintains a portfolio of properties. Directs the buying, selling, and leasing of properties in the portfolio. Provides information on operating costs as well as the annual budget for the properties. Evaluates records for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with policies. May manage commercial, industrial, or residential properties. Requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to top management. Manages subordinate staff in the day‐to‐day performance of their jobs. True first level manager. Ensures that project/department milestones/goals are met and adhering to approved budgets. Has full authority for personnel actions. Extensive knowledge of department processes. Typically requires 5 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. 1 to 3 years supervisory experience may be required. Balancing political interests with optimal economic returns, manages the City’s Real Estate Services team whose responsibilities include performing all necessary transactions for the acquisition, disposition, transfer and/or conveyance of the City’s real property. This position is a part of the Department of Community and Neighborhoods Administration and reports the CARES Policy and Program Manager. Bachelor's degree in public administration, finance, accounting or a related field, Education may be substituted for a Professional Real Estate designation such as SIOR, CCIM, CRE,CPM, etc. The incumbent must have at least six years of progressively responsible experience in the area of real property acquisition, management, sales or appraising, including a minimum of two years supervisory duties. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$78,863 $87,148 $95,538 $81,897 $90,532 $99,293 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$82,116 $90,706 $99,378 $85,275 $94,229 $103,285 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$94,328 $105,361 $116,182 $98,460 $109,965 $121,270 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$98,130 $109,499 $120,614 $102,428 $114,284 $125,896 Overall 100%$88,359 $98,179 $107,928 $92,015 $102,253 $112,436 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$90,800 $106,700 $127,100 $96,300 $115,200 $140,100 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$94,000 $110,500 $131,600 $99,700 $119,200 $145,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$82,900 $97,400 $116,000 $87,900 $105,100 $127,800 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$85,800 $100,800 $120,100 $91,000 $108,800 $132,300 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$90,500 $106,400 $126,700 $96,000 $114,800 $139,600 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$93,700 $110,100 $131,200 $99,300 $118,800 $144,500 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$82,600 $97,100 $115,600 $87,600 $104,800 $127,400 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$85,500 $100,500 $119,700 $90,600 $108,400 $131,900 Overall 100%$88,225 $103,688 $123,500 $93,550 $111,888 $136,075 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$124,545 $141,917 $156,384 $131,484 $155,939 $182,590 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$126,949 $144,658 $159,403 $134,024 $158,950 $186,116 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$125,747 $143,288 $157,894 $132,754 $157,445 $184,353 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 25.0%$87,618 $100,674 $116,586 $87,618 $105,468 $118,014 Utah | All 25.0%$87,618 $100,674 $116,586 $87,618 $105,468 $118,014 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 25.0%$76,296 $87,006 $116,688 $76,296 $87,006 $116,688 Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 25.0%$76,296 $87,006 $116,688 $76,296 $87,006 $116,688 SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$81,957 $93,840 $116,637 $81,957 $96,237 $117,351 Survey Information CompData Regulatory Compliance Manager $137,554 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Compliance Manager Coordinates and manages the daily activities in the Compliance Department, including oversight of incoming calls and requests for information. Oversees the creation of internal control and operational programs, policies, procedures, and practices. Reviews and analyzes compliance audits. Oversees department staff, ensuring work flow is accurate and punctual. Economic Research Institute $96,072 $109,748 $126,490 $100,069 $116,955 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Investigate and report adverse events, compliance violations and similar problems. Work directly with departments and project personnel to ensure compliance and inform of updates to regulations. Ensure that projects and proposals meet all relevant guidelines, standards, and regulatory rules, conducting research where needed. Oversee preparation, data, testing procedures, and compliance aspects of proposals and reports. Regulatory; Manages Professional employees and/or Supervisors. Has budget, deadline responsibility in the area managed. Typically responsible for the day‐to‐day management of one functional area. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5+ years of related professional experience, 1+ years supervisory experience. Regulatory Affairs Management Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MNGR ‐ 002391 1 $95,992 $95,992 Designs and develops programs, policies, and practices to ensure that the organization complies with federal, state, and local regulatory requirements. Manages the monitoring of business activities for compliance with applicable rules and regulations. Tracks relevant laws and regulations and directs staff to update operating manuals and procedural documents when regulations change. Prepares compliance status reports for internal management and regulatory agencies as required. Requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to top management. Manages subordinate staff in the day‐to‐day performance of their jobs. True first level manager. Ensures that project/department milestones/goals are met and adhering to approved budgets. Has full authority for personnel actions. Extensive knowledge of department processes. Typically requires 5 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. 1 to 3 years supervisory experience may be required. Reporting to the Water Reclamation Manager, assesses and oversees regulatory programs that fall under Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) regulations. This includes Clean Water Act (CWA), Clean Air Act (CAA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) regulations. Ensures compliance of regulatory permits and oversees associated programs including Industrial Pretreatment Program (IPP) and Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Program. Monitors the data generated for regulatory compliance. Ensures collection of all regulatory samples, proper analysis of such samples, and reviews data quality for compliance. Reviews data reports, and maintains records and contracts relating to wastewater, stormwater and air quality analyses. Reviews data reports, maintains records and contracts relating to all wastewater, stormwater and air quality analyses. Coordinates activities with Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) program managers and associated team members. Serves as acting Water Reclamation Manager during absence of regularly classified incumbent, if management determines individual is qualified. Bachelor degree in environmental science, chemistry, biology, or a closely related field. Eight (8) years of experience related to the above duties including four (4) years of supervisory work experience. Education and experience may be substituted one for the other on a year‐for‐year basis (not including the requirement for supervisory experience). Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$62,689 $68,737 $74,848 $64,192 $70,404 $76,691 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$65,203 $71,457 $77,732 $66,766 $73,190 $79,645 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$71,815 $80,097 $88,419 $73,839 $82,348 $90,910 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$74,623 $83,092 $91,556 $76,726 $85,427 $94,136 Overall 100%$68,583 $75,846 $83,139 $70,381 $77,842 $85,346 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$65,500 $75,900 $86,800 $67,800 $79,500 $92,300 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$65,900 $76,300 $87,300 $68,200 $79,900 $92,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$60,700 $70,300 $80,400 $62,800 $73,700 $85,600 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$61,100 $70,800 $80,900 $63,200 $74,100 $86,100 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$65,200 $75,500 $86,400 $67,500 $79,100 $91,900 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$65,600 $76,000 $86,900 $67,900 $79,600 $92,500 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$60,500 $70,000 $80,100 $62,600 $73,400 $85,200 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$60,800 $70,500 $80,600 $62,900 $73,800 $85,700 Overall 100%$63,163 $73,163 $83,675 $65,363 $76,638 $89,025 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$63,257 $68,749 $79,010 $64,628 $71,592 $81,372 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%$63,911 $69,461 $79,829 $65,297 $72,332 $82,213 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 33.0%$67,260 $72,688 $73,352 $67,260 $72,688 $74,343 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$64,800 $70,291 $77,421 $65,724 $72,205 $79,338 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Risk Analyst II $84,570 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Risk Management Specialist Analyzes risks to business operations, and identifies and handles any issues that may arise related to insurance or safety, which could result in litigation if not identified and dealt with. Finds areas that pose risks to the assets, earning capacity, insurance rates, or success of organizations. Documents and communicates risks or potential risk and recommends ways to control, reduce, or eliminate risks. Develops risk management systems; and implements and enforces plans, policies, or strategies that will minimize business losses, lower the cost of insurance, and increase revenue. Economic Research Institute $65,515 $73,100 $81,412 $67,156 $75,562 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Assist in developing risk mitigation strategies and implementing them. Process and respond to workers' compensation, liability, and other legal and insurance lings and adjustments. Present risk analyses to consumers, decision‐makers or management, making recommendations for action. Conduct statistical and in‐person analyses to identify and categorize risk and potential risk. Risk Management; Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency in the primary duties of the job family. Plays a key role in Implementing projects and programs in the function. Acts as a resource to managers and employees in the organization. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Risk Management Specialist ‐ Intermediate Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST ‐ 000877 1 $76,294 $76,294 Performs risk analysis studies in order to maintain maximum protection of an organization's assets. Evaluates and forecasts potential losses while determining solutions to minimize or eliminate risks. Compiles reports containing appraisal findings. Supports senior analysts and managers in data analysis or risk model construction. Requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a supervisor or manager. Gains exposure to some of the complex tasks within the job function. Occasionally directed in several aspects of the work. Typically requires 2 to 4 years of related experience. Reporting to and working in close collaboration with the City’s Risk Manager, incumbent provides operational support and analysis of risk management programs. Utilizing risk management software and other reporting tools, works with City departments to reduce the frequency and costs of claims. As necessary, provides coordination and operational support for claims, reviews and investigates claims and determines appropriate closure of claims. Performs a substantial amount of analysis and reporting to support risk reduction recommendations. Bachelor’s degree in Risk Management, Business Administration, English, Communications, Finance, or other related field, and a minimum of one to two (1‐2) years’ professional experience performing duties similar to those listed above. The educational requirement may be substituted with years of related experience on a year for year basis. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$89,839 $99,017 $108,323 $96,150 $106,029 $116,073 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$94,243 $103,723 $113,310 $100,864 $111,069 $121,416 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$109,126 $121,413 $134,206 $117,665 $130,895 $144,707 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$114,135 $126,748 $139,821 $123,066 $136,647 $150,761 Overall 100%$101,836 $112,725 $123,915 $109,436 $121,160 $133,239 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$96,400 $111,200 $127,200 $101,400 $118,400 $138,500 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$101,100 $116,600 $133,300 $106,300 $124,100 $145,200 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$89,600 $103,400 $118,200 $94,200 $110,100 $128,700 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$93,900 $108,300 $123,900 $98,800 $115,400 $134,900 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$96,100 $110,800 $126,700 $101,000 $118,000 $138,000 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$100,700 $116,100 $132,800 $105,900 $123,700 $144,600 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$89,300 $103,000 $117,700 $93,900 $109,600 $128,200 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$93,600 $107,900 $123,400 $98,400 $114,900 $134,400 Overall 100%$95,088 $109,663 $125,400 $99,988 $116,775 $136,563 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$120,486 $134,332 $149,842 $124,844 $140,634 $161,319 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$123,822 $138,051 $153,989 $128,300 $144,527 $165,784 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0% Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0% Sector: Public Administration 0.0% Overall 100%$122,154 $136,192 $151,916 $126,572 $142,581 $163,552 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Risk Manager $144,451 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Risk Management Manager Manages, plans, and coordinates risk and insurance programs of establishment to control risks and losses. Identifies, evaluates, and implements corrective action against risks that may result in injury, property loss, damage, or legal liability. Analyzes and classifies risks as to frequency and potential severity, and measures financial impact of risk on company. Economic Research Institute $106,359 $119,526 $133,744 $111,999 $126,839 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Coordinate economical application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability and/or impact of unfortunate events or to maximize the realization of opportunities from risk. Identify, assess, and prioritize risks. Risk Management; Manages Professional employees and/or Supervisors. Has budget, deadline responsibility in the area managed. Typically responsible for the day‐to‐day management of one functional area. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5+ years of related professional experience, 1+ years supervisory experience. Risk Management ‐ 1st Level Manager Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information RISK MANAGER ‐ 002170 1 $102,357 $102,357 Develops and administers risk‐management and loss‐prevention programs. Initiates policies to comply with safety legislation and industry practices. Researches and reports on the most cost effective plans to minimize asset liability. Acts as the liaison to attorneys, insurance companies and individuals, investigating any incidences that may result in asset loss. Reviews and analyzes risk management programs for the effectiveness of coverage and to reduce costs and losses. Requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to top management. Manages subordinate staff in the day‐to‐day performance of their jobs. True first level manager. Ensures that project/department milestones/goals are met and adhering to approved budgets. Has full authority for personnel actions. Extensive knowledge of department processes. Typically requires 5 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. 1 to 3 years supervisory experience may be required. Incumbent directs the Risk Management Division of the City Attorney’s Office. Identifies, evaluates, mitigates, and manages the city’s operational, strategic and hazardous risks through contractual risk transfer, purchase of insurance, and/or development of self‐insurance programs. Develops and manages programs that reduce or eliminate financial loss to the city. Bachelor’s degree in finance, risk management, or related field, plus five (5) years of related experience. Education and/or experience may be substituted one for the other on a year for year basis. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$51,944 $56,417 $60,749 $53,131 $57,723 $62,182 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$53,595 $58,198 $62,650 $54,820 $59,546 $64,127 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$56,631 $62,691 $68,588 $58,223 $64,446 $70,516 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$58,419 $64,642 $70,677 $60,061 $66,452 $72,664 Overall 100%$55,147 $60,487 $65,666 $56,559 $62,042 $67,372 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$64,000 $79,300 $92,800 $65,100 $81,000 $97,800 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$65,000 $80,600 $94,300 $66,200 $82,400 $99,500 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$56,200 $69,600 $81,500 $57,200 $71,200 $85,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$57,100 $70,800 $82,900 $58,200 $72,400 $87,400 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$63,700 $78,900 $92,400 $64,900 $80,700 $97,400 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$64,800 $80,300 $93,900 $66,000 $82,000 $99,100 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$55,900 $69,300 $81,100 $57,000 $70,800 $85,600 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$56,900 $70,500 $82,500 $57,900 $72,000 $87,000 Overall 100%$60,450 $74,913 $87,675 $61,563 $76,563 $92,463 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 100.0%$82,465 $88,827 $97,342 $82,465 $89,177 $101,275 Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$82,465 $88,827 $97,342 $82,465 $89,177 $101,275 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Recommend changes to work conditions and procedures to improve the work environment and comply with all health and safety regulations. Report safety violations and injuries to the appropriate authorities. Analyze work environment for unsafe work procedures and hazards. Provide health and safety training to all employees. Inspect work environment to ensure compliance with all health and safety regulations. Occupational Safety and Health; Exhibits technical and operational proficiency in the primary duties of the job family. Plays a key role in Implementing projects and programs in the function. Acts as a resource to managers and employees in the organization. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Health and Safety Coordinator Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SAFETY COORDINATOR ‐ 002521 3 $72,793 $72,446 Implements, manages and monitors safety programs, policies, and procedures that meet OSHA and other applicable requirements. Evaluates the organization's procedures, facilities and equipment by conducting inspections to identify unsafe conditions and to implement safeguards and solutions. Ensures the organization complies with all current safety regulations and that all employees are aware of safety requirements and are prepared to follow safety procedures. Collects data and reports on all safety and accident events. May have additional responsibility for fire prevention, hazardous waste management, resource conservation, or other safety related activities depending on the industry and location. May require a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a manager. Occasionally directed in several aspects of the work. Gaining exposure to some of the complex tasks within the job function. Till i 2 4 f ltd i Under the direction of the Department Safety Programs Manager, incumbent develops, plans, implements and monitors all needed safety related programs for Department Divisions. Investigates and determines root causes and mitigation steps for employee related injuries and accidents. Promotes compliance with local, state and federal regulations, including established City policies and procedures to ensure a safe and healthy work environment. Assists with the development of safety, emergency preparedness, health and wellness programs. Assists with the periodic exercise of emergency plans, drills, and tabletop scenarios to maintain operational readiness of the Department. Requires the ability to communicate effectively with all levels of diverse employee groups in various settings. Also requires excellent written and verbal communication skills and the ability to make independent decisions when necessary. Bachelor’s degree in Safety, Industrial Hygiene, Environmental Science, or related field plus three years of related work experience. Related education and/or work experience may be substituted one for the other on a year to year basis. $66,021 $74,742 $83,561 $66,862 $75,927 $87,037 Safety Specialist Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Safety Coordinator Coordinates and enforces employee health and safety programs and promotes safety awareness to minimize work‐related injuries. Comprehends federal, state, and local safety regulations and ensures that the company is in compliance with Occupational Safety and Health (OHS) guidelines. Drafts and updates safety training materials and trains staff on safety protocols and preventative measures. Runs risk assessments on workspaces and presents reports to safety managers. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$85,707 $93,874 $101,976 $90,292 $98,937 $107,536 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$88,911 $97,345 $105,683 $93,668 $102,596 $111,445 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$102,782 $113,547 $124,155 $108,982 $120,382 $131,645 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$106,511 $117,546 $128,378 $112,937 $124,623 $136,123 Overall 100%$95,978 $105,578 $115,048 $101,470 $111,635 $121,687 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$90,700 $104,100 $119,600 $93,900 $110,000 $130,000 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$92,100 $105,800 $121,600 $95,500 $111,700 $132,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$84,400 $96,900 $111,300 $87,400 $102,300 $121,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$85,800 $98,500 $113,100 $88,800 $104,000 $123,000 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$90,300 $103,700 $119,200 $93,600 $109,500 $129,500 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$91,800 $105,400 $121,100 $95,100 $111,300 $131,600 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$84,100 $96,500 $110,900 $87,100 $101,900 $120,500 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$85,400 $98,100 $112,700 $88,500 $103,600 $122,500 Overall 100%$88,075 $101,125 $116,188 $91,238 $106,788 $126,275 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 100.0%$93,150 $96,183 $111,375 $95,065 $97,991 $113,567 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$93,150 $96,183 $111,375 $95,065 $97,991 $113,567 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Safety Manager $120,510 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Safety Manager Manages, plans, and implements programs to reduce or eliminate occupational injuries, illnesses, deaths, and financial losses. Develops accident‐prevention and loss‐control systems and programs for incorporation into operational policies of organization. Manages and coordinates safety activities, through subordinate supervisory personnel, to ensure implementation of safety activities throughout organization. Economic Research Institute $92,401 $100,962 $114,204 $95,924 $105,471 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Conduct and coordinate safety inspections. Ensure company compliance with all applicable laws governing environmental health and safety. Lead the investigation of accidents and injuries, and cooperate in the preparation of material for hearings and insurance investigations. Design and train all levels of employees. Participate in the development of safety and health policies, practices and procedures. Occupational Safety and Health; Manages Professional employees and/or Supervisors. Has budget, deadline responsibility in the area managed. Typically responsible for the day‐to‐day management of one functional area. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5+ years of related professional experience, 1+ years supervisory experience. Safety Management ‐ 1st Level Manager Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SAFETY PROGRAM MGR ‐ 002286 2 $91,666 $91,666 Plans and manages the general health, safety, and loss control policies and procedures of the organization. Monitors and evaluates the workplace to ensure compliance with governmental regulatory agencies. Designs and directs safety training programs to reduce accidents, occupational illnesses, and exposure to long‐term health hazards. Develops worker plans and policies for new employee safety orientation including skill training, emergency preparedness, proper job instruction, hazardous material disposal procedures, and the use of protective equipment. Studies, identifies, and reports causes of past accidents and develops recommendations and follow‐up to prevent accident recurrences. Requires a bachelor's degree of occupational safety and health or related degree. Typically reports to a head of a unit/department. Manages subordinate staff in the day‐to‐day performance of their jobs. True first level manager. Ensures that project/department milestones/goals are met and adhering to approved budgets. Has full authority for personnel actions. Extensive knowledge of department processes. Typically requires 5 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. 1 to 3 years supervisory experience may be required. Incumbent plans, develops, implements and monitors departmental safety programs including: industrial hygiene, emergency preparedness, environmental compliance, workplace safety training, and worker's compensation programs. Assists management and employees to ensure compliance with all state and federal standards. Establishes guidelines and procedures intended to reduce the department's exposure to losses from safety and environmental violations and worker's compensation claims. Responsible for managing the periodic exercise of emergency plans, drills, and tabletop scenarios to maintain operational readiness of the Department. Bachelor's degree in Industrial Safety/Engineering, Industrial Hygiene, Environmental Science or a related field from an accredited four‐year institution, plus five to six years related work experience. Education and work experience may be substituted one for the other on a year‐for‐year basis. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$70,786 $77,881 $85,067 $73,462 $80,858 $88,363 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$72,753 $80,190 $87,766 $75,504 $83,255 $91,167 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$82,659 $92,308 $101,938 $86,280 $96,342 $106,405 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$85,224 $95,414 $105,561 $88,958 $99,584 $110,186 Overall 100%$77,856 $86,448 $95,083 $81,051 $90,010 $99,030 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$88,200 $100,500 $111,300 $88,600 $101,000 $111,500 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$89,800 $102,300 $113,300 $90,200 $102,800 $113,500 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$87,900 $100,200 $111,000 $88,300 $100,700 $111,200 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$89,500 $102,000 $113,000 $89,900 $102,500 $113,200 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$87,800 $100,100 $110,800 $88,200 $100,600 $111,000 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$89,400 $101,900 $112,800 $89,800 $102,400 $113,000 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$87,600 $99,800 $110,500 $87,900 $100,300 $110,700 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$89,100 $101,600 $112,500 $89,500 $102,100 $112,700 Overall 100%$88,663 $101,050 $111,900 $89,050 $101,550 $112,100 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$133,386 $144,414 $160,652 $134,740 $148,948 $163,171 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$137,078 $148,411 $165,099 $138,471 $153,071 $167,687 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$135,232 $146,413 $162,876 $136,606 $151,010 $165,429 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Ensure project deliverables are met on time and on budget. Delegate work and provide oversight of group work plans. Manage an architectural team of junior and senior architects as well as administrative personnel. Responsible for all architectural design aspects of large or complex projects. Architecture; Subject‐matter leader in the job family. Leads the planning and implementation of large programs in the function, and regularly interfaces with senior management and executive leadership. Provides advice and counsel to the organization in area of expertise. Plays a role in overall functional strategic planning. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree (advanced degree preferred), 8‐10+ years of related professional experience. Architect ‐ Advanced Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SENIOR ARCHITECT (LICENSED) ‐ 000751 2 $99,757 $99,757 Responsible for substantial architectural projects. Selects, evaluates, and implements architectural procedures and techniques used to complete projects. Writes reports and specifications, supervises the preparation of architectural plans, and reviews completed plans and estimates. Supervises and guides the work of lower‐level architects. Requires the use of more advanced techniques. Requires a bachelor's degree of architecture. Typically reports to a supervisor or manager. May require a state architect's license. A specialist on complex technical and business matters. Work is highly independent. May assume a team lead role for the work group. Typically requires 7+ years of related experience. As a Licensed Architect, supervises and manages major architectural projects and programs. Has full technical and managerial responsibility for interpreting, organizing, executing, and coordinating assignments. This is highly technical and managerial work requiring extensive architectural and construction project management experience. Possession of a five‐year bachelor’s degree or a master’s degree in architecture from a fully accredited college or university. Exception: The educational requirement may be waived providing the candidate has achieved registration as a Licensed Architect by meeting the State Board’s requirement for qualifying experience. $100,583 $111,304 $123,286 $102,236 $114,190 $125,520 Architect IV Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Architect Researches, plans, designs, and supervises construction of building projects for clients, according to their desires, needs, and financial resources, applying knowledge of design, construction procedures, zoning and building codes, and building materials. Consults with clients to determine functional and spatial requirements of new structure or renovation; and prepares information regarding design, specifications, materials, color, equipment, estimated costs, and construction time. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$54,637 $59,421 $64,142 $56,091 $61,022 $65,899 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$56,792 $61,814 $66,765 $58,304 $63,480 $68,594 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$60,806 $67,414 $74,012 $62,759 $69,571 $76,388 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$63,268 $70,188 $77,071 $65,300 $72,434 $79,545 Overall 100%$58,876 $64,709 $70,498 $60,614 $66,627 $72,607 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 25.0%$67,500 $76,700 $86,300 $69,400 $80,400 $91,500 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 25.0%$68,300 $77,700 $87,400 $70,300 $81,400 $92,700 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 25.0%$67,200 $76,400 $85,900 $69,100 $80,100 $91,100 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 25.0%$68,000 $77,300 $87,000 $70,000 $81,100 $92,300 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$67,750 $77,025 $86,650 $69,700 $80,750 $91,900 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 50.0%$80,438 $89,562 $98,349 $84,207 $104,111 $119,766 Salt Lake Metro 50.0%$84,003 $93,532 $102,708 $87,940 $108,726 $125,074 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$82,221 $91,547 $100,529 $86,074 $106,419 $122,420 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Senior Claims Adjuster $95,642 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Insurance Claims Adjuster Investigates claims against insurance or other companies for personal, casualty, or property loss or damages. Concludes extent of company's liability and attempts to effect out‐of‐court settlement with claimant. Economic Research Institute $69,615 $77,760 $85,892 $72,129 $84,598 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Oversee the work of outside vendors, appraisers, and adjusters. Investigate, evaluate, negotiate, and settle high level claims. Review claim les to ensure compliance with company policy and quality standards. Supervise staff making determinations about insurance policy coverage and claims. Claims Examiner; Supervises and monitors the day‐to‐day activities of a group of (typically non‐exempt) staff. Organizes work and provides direct supervision to subordinates. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 3+ years of related professional experience. Claims Management Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SENIOR CLAIMS ADJUSTER ‐ 002534 1 $77,189 $77,189 Denies, settles, or authorizes payments to more complex property/casualty claims based on coverage, appraisal, and verifiable damage. Examines claim forms and other records to determine coverage. Responsible for corresponding with policyholders, claimants, witnesses, attorneys, etc. to gather important information to support contested. Conducts field investigations to inspect and document damage or loss. Prepares report of findings of an investigation. May require a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Typically requires 4 to 7 years of related experience. Under general supervision of the Risk Manager, incumbent performs a variety of specialized, skilled technical duties and special project work related to claims received by the city. Gathers relevant claims information and interviews claimants; manages claims, records, and tracking systems; reviews records for accuracy and completeness. Manages auto and general liability claims from receipt through settlement or litigation, including investigations, determination of liability, settlement negotiations/denials, and proper document management of private and protected information. Bachelor’s degree in Risk Management, Business Administration, English, Communications, Finance, or other related field, and a minimum of 1‐2 years’ experience working with claims. Experience and training must include records management, research, data entry and retrieval, and proficiency in the use of personal computers for word processing and spreadsheets. Education and experience may be substituted one for the other on a year‐for‐year basis. Additionally, must have at least 4 years’ experience adjusting a variety of claims, including general liability and auto liability. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$50,653 $55,210 $59,656 $51,393 $56,030 $60,559 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$53,104 $57,925 $62,614 $53,881 $58,785 $63,562 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$54,592 $60,708 $66,717 $55,584 $61,807 $67,929 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$57,272 $63,722 $70,033 $58,313 $64,876 $71,306 Overall 100%$53,905 $59,391 $64,755 $54,793 $60,375 $65,839 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$50,400 $56,600 $63,100 $51,200 $57,700 $64,800 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$50,000 $56,100 $62,600 $50,800 $57,200 $64,200 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$48,400 $54,300 $60,600 $49,100 $55,300 $62,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$47,900 $53,800 $60,000 $48,700 $54,800 $61,600 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$50,200 $56,300 $62,900 $51,000 $57,400 $64,500 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$49,800 $55,800 $62,300 $50,500 $56,900 $63,900 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$48,200 $54,000 $60,300 $48,900 $55,100 $61,900 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$47,700 $53,600 $59,800 $48,500 $54,600 $61,300 Overall 100%$49,075 $55,063 $61,450 $49,838 $56,125 $63,038 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 100.0%$49,675 $53,686 $58,583 $49,675 $53,927 $58,637 Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$49,675 $53,686 $58,583 $49,675 $53,927 $58,637 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$41,208 $43,248 $45,186 $41,208 $43,248 $45,186 Utah | All 50.0%$41,208 $43,248 $45,186 $41,208 $43,248 $45,186 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$41,208 $43,248 $45,186 $41,208 $43,248 $45,186 Survey Information CompData Human Resources Assistant II (Senior) Assists with administrative or clerical work in relation to various human resource support operations. Helps with recruitment activities, maintains job descriptions and organizational charts, conducts new employee orientation, monitors the division budget, and coordinates purchase orders. Manages data and reports, handles scheduling, and assists with special events and activities. High school education or equivalent required and two years experience. HR Assistant III $58,175 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Human Resources Technician Performs clerical and administrative support to one or more functional areas within Human Resources. Work is distinguished from Personnel Clerk in that the Technician is capable of handling more complex aspect of the Personnel Clerk duties; the Personnel Technician requires more in‐depth knowledge of personnel programs, company policies, and administrative procedures. Answers more complex employee questions. Explains more complex aspects of company personnel programs such as salary and benefit administration, recruitment and placement, employee development, employee relations and services, equal employment opportunity, and/or labor relations. Economic Research Institute $48,976 $52,847 $57,494 $48,878 $53,419 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Compiles and prepares data for statistical reporting. Assist in projects, such as; HR events, benefits open enrollment, employee communications and company‐wide meetings. Supports employment area with scheduling interviews, handling reference checks and personnel changes. Provides overall administrative support to the HR department, including maintaining, processing documentation and records. Answer employee questions about policy and procedures, and refers to specialist as needed. Generalist / HR Management; Leads specialized area of administrative support or provides support to Vice President or higher. Full knowledge of procedures in area of expertise. May provide work direction to lower‐level support employees. Receives broad supervision. Typically requires: High School diploma or GED, at least 5 years of related experience, thorough knowledge of policies and procedures, highly tactful communications, expertise with related systems. Human Resources Assistant ‐ Senior Administrative Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES TECH ‐ 001866 4 $49,457 $49,358 Provides administrative support to one or more human resources functions, including recruiting, employee/labor relations, compensation, benefits, training, equal employment opportunity, and/or employee records. Processes HR department applications, including employment and enrollment applications; maintains attendance and employment records, and compiles statistics for various HR management reports. May conduct pre‐employment screening interviews, check references and respond to routine questions on HR policy. May coach and provide instruction to lower‐level professional staff. May require an associate degree or its equivalent. Typically reports to a supervisor or manager. Has gained proficiency in multiple competencies relevant to the job. Works independently within established procedures associated with the specific job function. Typically requires 3‐5 years of related experience. Under limited supervision, incumbent performs advanced level duties and provides operational and technical support to human resource programs and management staff. Acts as a lead and functionally supervises the work of Front Desk support staff. Performs human resource support functions, including but not limited to: employment‐related documentation intake; data entry; personnel records management; and, maintenance and security of confidential personnel files. In addition, assists employees, management, staff and members of the general public with personnel information; explains human resource policies and procedures. Maintains electronic records, including employee data and human resources information systems. Answers phones, greets visitors, and verifies employment status, as needed. Assists management and other staff with: scheduling appointments; new employee orientation; and other work projects, as assigned. Incumbents in this class possess and apply advanced knowledge of human resource related policies, procedures, rules and regulations and skill in the use of automated human resource management information systems. Graduation from high school or equivalency plus two to four years directly related human resources experience. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$64,631 $70,936 $77,344 $66,067 $72,531 $79,108 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$66,340 $72,791 $79,289 $67,814 $74,427 $81,098 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$74,295 $82,989 $91,737 $76,232 $85,146 $94,128 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$76,203 $84,981 $93,763 $78,190 $87,191 $96,208 Overall 100%$70,367 $77,924 $85,533 $72,076 $79,824 $87,636 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$77,400 $86,800 $98,000 $80,400 $91,700 $105,100 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$83,000 $93,100 $105,000 $86,200 $98,300 $112,700 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$68,400 $76,800 $86,700 $71,100 $81,100 $92,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$73,300 $82,300 $92,900 $76,200 $86,900 $99,600 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$77,100 $86,500 $97,600 $80,100 $91,400 $104,700 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$82,600 $92,700 $104,600 $85,900 $97,900 $112,200 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$68,200 $76,500 $86,300 $70,800 $80,800 $92,600 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$73,000 $82,000 $92,500 $75,900 $86,600 $99,200 Overall 100%$75,375 $84,588 $95,450 $78,325 $89,338 $102,375 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 100.0%$89,385 $103,009 $118,002 $90,147 $106,099 $126,063 Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$89,385 $103,009 $118,002 $90,147 $106,099 $126,063 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Chemist III $105,358 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Chemist Researches, analyzes, synthesizes, and experiments on substances, for such purposes as product and process development and application, quantitative and qualitative analysis, and improvement of analytical methodologies. Economic Research Institute $78,376 $88,507 $99,662 $80,183 $91,753 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Interpret and analyze data and equipment logs from other laboratory members. Maintain, troubleshoot, and use instruments, equipment and software tools. Collect and document quality assurance test data, including testing formulations, substrates and reagents. Senior/Career Level Professional; Broadly applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Solves a diverse range of complex problems, working with limited direction. Frequently interfaces with internal/external customers and makes significant contributions to department goals and planning efforts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5‐7 years of related professional experience. Chemist ‐ Senior/Career Level Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SENIOR LABORATORY CHEMIST ‐ 002399 1 $73,320 $73,320 Evaluates the chemical and physical properties of various organic and inorganic substances. Utilizes established methods and procedures and laboratory equipment to perform analytical testing of substances. Prepares compounds, reagents and solutions. Develop and write technical reports of testing results. Requires a master's degree. Typically reports to a supervisor or manager. Typically requires 4 to 7 years of related experience. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Reporting to the Laboratory Program Manager, this position provides supervision and oversight of the day‐to‐day operations of the Salt Lake City Water Reclamation Facility (SLCWRF) Laboratory. Performs supervisory duties of laboratory personnel and quality control of generated data. Will also perform routine analysis and/or research to include chemical and microbiological testing of wastewater, culinary water, sludge and soils for Salt Lake City Corporation in coordination with the Laboratory Program Manager and/or other Salt Lake City Program Managers. This is a senior professional chemist position requiring minimal supervision. Assists the Laboratory Program Manager to ensure compliance with NELAP requirements for maintaining laboratory certification for all necessary parameters. Coordinates with a contracted Quality Assurance Officer (when applicable) for ensuring analytical quality control and reports to the Laboratory Program Manager. Serves as acting Laboratory Program Manager during absence of regularly classified incumbent, if management determines individual is qualified. Four‐year degree in Chemistry, Biochemical Engineering, Bacteriology, Microbiology or a closely related scientific field from an accredited college or university and seven years related water/wastewater laboratory analytical experience. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$45,187 $48,196 $50,826 $45,187 $48,196 $50,826 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$47,424 $50,606 $53,443 $47,424 $50,606 $53,443 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$47,074 $51,117 $54,665 $47,074 $51,117 $54,665 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$49,409 $53,758 $57,632 $49,409 $53,758 $57,632 Overall 100%$47,274 $50,919 $54,142 $47,274 $50,919 $54,142 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$58,700 $64,100 $70,000 $59,000 $64,300 $70,300 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$59,300 $64,800 $70,800 $59,600 $64,900 $71,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$56,000 $61,200 $66,800 $56,300 $61,300 $67,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$56,600 $61,800 $67,500 $56,900 $62,000 $67,800 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$58,500 $63,800 $69,700 $58,800 $64,000 $70,000 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$59,100 $64,500 $70,500 $59,400 $64,700 $70,700 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$55,800 $60,900 $66,500 $56,000 $61,000 $66,800 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$56,400 $61,500 $67,200 $56,600 $61,700 $67,500 Overall 100%$57,550 $62,825 $68,625 $57,825 $62,988 $68,913 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$55,520 $61,153 $70,114 $55,520 $61,153 $70,114 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%$57,478 $63,310 $72,586 $57,478 $63,310 $72,586 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 33.0%$38,966 $43,625 $51,712 $38,966 $43,625 $51,712 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$50,723 $56,102 $64,882 $50,723 $56,102 $64,882 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Gather relevant information pertaining to case issues. Facilitate education, support groups and referrals. Assess and treat patients and their families in understanding and coping with emotional and social problems. Maintain caseload, documentation and reevaluate patients at appropriate intervals. Provide advocacy and resource services for the patient. Social Work; Professional level position, working under general supervision responsible for clinical, therapeutic, or diagnostic procedures. Typically responsible for the development and implementation of a treatment plan. Often referenced as "Technologist" or "Therapist". Requires completion of an approved clinical program with an Associate's degree or Bachelor's degree with 2‐4 years of work experience. This level requires certification, licensure, or registration within the clinical discipline. Social Worker ‐ Intermediate Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SOCIAL SERVICE WORKER (CSW) ‐ 002499 5 $58,082 $58,698 Interviews clients and their families and coordinates and plans programs and activities to meet their social and emotional needs. Provides crisis intervention and assists families in understanding the implications and complexities of the life situation and its impact on lifestyle. Provides professional social work assistance to clients and families as related to illness, disease, hospitalization, financial and educational needs by utilizing a variety of modalities in all areas of service. Responsibilities also include involvement in the discharge planning process. Requires a master's degree. Typically reports to a manager. Years of experience may be unspecified. Certification and/or licensing in the position's specialty is the main requirement. Under the general administrative direction of the Social Work Manager of the Police Department, incumbent provides immediate crisis intervention and case management services to assist citizens and/or their families, along with assistance to prevent the intersection or further intersection with the criminal justice system. These citizens and/or their families may have the following problems: homelessness, substance abuse/dependence, mental and/or chronic health illnesses, domestic violence, employment issues, poverty, being a victim of crime, and access to other basic necessities. The incumbent must be willing to work closely with the entire team of the Salt Lake City Police Department, engage with external service providers on a regular basis and have the ability and skills necessary to work with the general public in a positive, friendly, and professional manner. Current Licensure with the State of Utah as a Social Service Worker, Advanced Substance Use Disorder Counselor, Licensed Substance Use Disorder Counselor or Certified Substance Use Disorder Counselor OR five years of directly related work experience in social work. $51,849 $56,615 $62,549 $51,940 $56,670 $62,645 Social Worker Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Social Service Worker Guides and counsels individuals and families in crisis, ranging from the unemployed to children who need foster homes to elderly people who have no one to care for them. Assists clients in obtaining government funds, education, or treatment. Secures information, such as medical, psychological, and social factors contributing to client's situation, and evaluates these and client's capacities. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$74,198 $81,449 $88,697 $76,746 $84,272 $91,807 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$77,948 $85,345 $92,694 $80,626 $88,302 $95,944 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$88,443 $98,224 $107,764 $91,909 $102,065 $111,987 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$92,437 $102,335 $112,016 $96,060 $106,336 $116,405 Overall 100%$83,257 $91,838 $100,293 $86,335 $95,244 $104,036 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 0.0%Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 0.0%Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Overall 0%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$123,008 $137,374 $153,420 $123,008 $137,374 $153,420 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%$127,346 $142,219 $158,830 $127,346 $142,219 $158,830 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 33.0%$65,624 $74,074 $85,335 $65,624 $74,074 $85,335 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$105,546 $118,132 $132,791 $105,546 $118,132 $132,791 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available $118,414 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Social Services Director Directs agency or major function of public or voluntary organization providing services in social welfare field and to individuals, groups, or community. Establishes policies and programs and administers such programs, working with Board of Directors committees. Determines policies and defines scope of services to be rendered within legislative regulations for public welfare agency functioning without Board of Directors. Economic Research Institute $94,401 $104,985 $116,542 $95,941 $106,688 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Gather relevant information pertaining to case issues. Facilitate education, support groups and referrals. Assess and treat patients and their families in understanding and coping with emotional and social problems. Maintain caseload, documentation and reevaluate patients at appropriate intervals. Provide advocacy and resource services for the patient. Advanced Professional; Advanced individual contributor professional with responsibility for clinical, therapeutic, or diagnostic procedures. Responsible for the development and implementation of treatment plans which may require significant departures from traditional approaches. Often referenced as "Therapist" or "Clinician". Requires completion of an approved clinical program with a Bachelor's degree, Master's degree, or Doctoral degree. This level requires certification, licensure, or registration within the clinical discipline. Social Worker ‐ Advanced Professional (P4) Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SOCIAL WORK DIRECTOR ‐ 002584 1 $91,666 $91,666 Under the direction of a Police Captain or Deputy Chief, incumbent evaluates the needs of the community while leading the social work program development, implementation, monitoring and analysis. Responsibilities include, but are not limited to: collaboration amongst eservice providers, City officials, various advisory groups, citizens, and other government agencies at a local, state, and federal level; facilitating internal and/or external meetings; performing complex analytical duties that include gathering data, data analysis, and developing comprehensive information packages; supervising social work program staff; developing and/or modifying policies and procedures to fit the social work program, all while working closely with the entire team of the Salt Lake City Police Department, to supplement existing police services where appropriate. This is a professional position in a fast‐paced work environment, requiring excellent written and verbal communication skills, the exercise of independent judgment, and discretion in handling confidential information. The incumbent must have the ability and skills necessary to work with the general public in a positive, friendly, and professional manner. Master’s Degree in Social Work from an accredited college/university and three to five years of related work experience, which includes assessing physical, mental, social, and economic needs of a diverse population. Experience must include a minimum of two years of social work case management. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$50,149 $54,462 $58,682 $51,765 $56,240 $60,631 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$52,776 $57,364 $61,832 $54,477 $59,237 $63,886 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$55,222 $61,123 $66,967 $57,389 $63,513 $69,595 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$58,171 $64,402 $70,501 $60,454 $66,921 $73,267 Overall 100%$54,080 $59,338 $64,496 $56,021 $61,478 $66,845 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$82,300 $91,700 $104,300 $82,600 $93,000 $109,100 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$83,200 $92,800 $105,500 $83,600 $94,100 $110,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$79,300 $88,400 $100,600 $79,700 $89,700 $105,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$80,200 $89,400 $101,700 $80,600 $90,700 $106,300 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$81,900 $91,400 $103,900 $82,300 $92,700 $108,600 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$82,800 $92,400 $105,000 $83,200 $93,700 $109,800 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$79,000 $88,100 $100,100 $79,300 $89,300 $104,700 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$79,800 $89,000 $101,300 $80,200 $90,300 $105,900 Overall 100%$81,063 $90,400 $102,800 $81,438 $91,688 $107,475 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah | All Industries 50.0%$57,423 $66,201 $80,188 $57,423 $66,201 $80,188 Salt Lake City | All Industries 50.0%$56,595 $65,246 $79,033 $56,595 $65,246 $79,033 Salt Lake City | Public Sector/Government 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, All Industries 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$57,009 $65,724 $79,611 $57,009 $65,724 $79,611 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Social Work Manager $84,643 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Social Services Manager Analyzes community needs. Designs outreach initiatives. Reviews program effectiveness. Implements needed improvements. Collects data and other information to evaluate program impact. Economic Research Institute $64,050 $71,820 $82,302 $64,823 $72,963 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Gather relevant information pertaining to case issues. Facilitate education, support groups and referrals. Assess and treat patients and their families in understanding and coping with emotional and social problems. Maintain caseload, documentation and reevaluate patients at appropriate intervals. Provide advocacy and resource services for the patient. Senior/Career Level Professional; Senior professional working under general guidance responsible for clinical, therapeutic, or diagnostic procedures. Typically responsible for the development and implementation of a treatment plan and the training of junior level staff. Often referenced as "Technologist" or "Therapist". Requires completion of an approved clinical program with an Bachelor's degree or Master's degree with 5‐7 years of work experience. This level requires certification, licensure, or registration within the clinical discipline. Social Worker ‐ Senior/Career Level Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SOCIAL WORK MANAGER ‐ 002583 2 $84,198 $84,198 Plans and implements programs to meet the social and emotional needs of patients and patients' families in a health care setting. Develops plans for patient care after release from treatment. Provides social services to patients/clients and their families. Collaborates with physicians, nurses, patients and their families to assess patient social needs and monitor progress of medical treatment. Coordinates planning for post‐discharge care. Supervises professional staff. Prepares departmental budgets and reports. Requires a master's degree of Social Work. Typically reports to a director. Manages subordinate staff in the day‐to‐day performance of their jobs. True first level manager. Ensures that project/department milestones/goals are met and adhering to approved budgets. Has full authority for personnel actions. Extensive knowledge of department processes. Typically requires 5 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. 1 to 3 years supervisory experience may be required. Under the general direction of the Social Work Director, incumbent evaluates the needs of the community and social work services. Works to assess and direct police social work responses to: citizen needs, implementing treatment plans as appropriate to assist client and/or families with problems such as homelessness, mental and chronic illness, substance abuse, loss of job, poverty, personal and family adjustment, and criminal behavior. Works closely with the entire team of the Salt Lake City Police Department, to augment existing police services where appropriate. Engages with service providers and exercises independent judgment. Assesses, diagnoses and formulates service plans and, when appropriate, clinical treatment plans for clients. Utilizes clinical skills in engaging with families in providing safety to children and other vulnerable populations. Documents client progress and treatment and prepares case histories, court reports, and other documentation as needed. Negotiates, coordinates, monitors and evaluates services. Manages civilian social workers and other office staff at the Community Connections Center. The position requires a strong focus on assertive community outreach and interventions with the homeless population in Salt Lake City. The incumbent must have the ability and skills necessary to work with the general public in a positive, friendly, and professional manner. The incumbent must also possess leadership skills that will motivate, positively influence, and constructively organize and direct the day to day activities of the employees of the Community Connections Center. 1.Master’s Degree in Social Work from an accredited college/university and three to ﬁve years of related work experience, which includes assessing physical, mental, social, and economic needs of a diverse population. Experience must include a minimum of two years of social work case management. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$80,306 $88,413 $96,602 $83,641 $92,119 $100,702 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$86,091 $94,763 $103,479 $89,666 $98,735 $107,870 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$95,360 $106,171 $116,878 $99,871 $111,182 $122,407 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$102,159 $113,597 $124,826 $106,992 $118,959 $130,731 Overall 100%$90,979 $100,736 $110,446 $95,043 $105,249 $115,428 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$111,700 $124,200 $141,700 $114,700 $128,100 $148,800 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$114,700 $127,500 $145,400 $117,700 $131,500 $152,700 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$97,400 $108,200 $123,500 $100,000 $111,600 $129,700 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$100,000 $111,100 $126,800 $102,600 $114,600 $133,200 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$111,200 $123,600 $141,100 $114,200 $127,500 $148,200 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$114,200 $126,900 $144,800 $117,200 $130,900 $152,100 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$97,000 $107,800 $123,000 $99,600 $111,200 $129,100 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$99,500 $110,600 $126,200 $102,200 $114,100 $132,600 Overall 100%$105,713 $117,488 $134,063 $108,525 $121,188 $140,800 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$91,775 $104,423 $117,053 $92,738 $105,535 $117,053 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%$92,233 $104,943 $117,636 $93,200 $106,060 $117,636 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 33.0%No Data Available $92,081 No Data Available No Data Available $92,081 No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$92,004 $100,527 $117,345 $92,969 $101,274 $117,345 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$88,434 $105,876 $124,236 $90,270 $105,876 $124,236 Utah | All 50.0%$88,434 $105,876 $124,236 $90,270 $105,876 $124,236 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$88,434 $105,876 $124,236 $90,270 $105,876 $124,236 Survey Information CompData Database Administrator Develops, codes, and maintains computer databases. Coordinates changes to computer databases and writes the code. Tests and implements changes. Modifies existing databases or directs programmers and analysts to make changes. Plans, coordinates, and implements security measures to ensure appropriate use of data and prevent damage, unauthorized modification, or disclosure. Specifies user and user access level. Reviews project requests to estimate time and costs. Bachelor's degree in computer science required and two years experience. Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Design, write, test, and debug database stored procedures and complex queries to extract, calculate or manipulate information. Work with middle‐tier developers to integrate back‐end database code with business applications. Design, implement, and test database schemas. Data Engineering; Fully applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Exhibits technical and operational pro efficiency solving problems of moderate complexity. Contributes to completion of projects and programs in area of expertise. May interface with internal and/or external customers and provide guidance to non‐exempts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 2‐4 years of related professional experience. Database Engineer Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SOFTWARE ENGINEER DATABASE ‐ 002150 2 $109,023 $109,023 Develops or modifies procedures to solve complex database design problems, including performance, scalability, security and integration issues. Designs, codes, tests, debugs, and documents complex databases. Competent to work at the highest technical level of all phases of database engineering activities. Requires comprehensive knowledge of database technologies, along with solid coding and computer system skills. Typically requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a manager or head of a unit/department. A specialist on complex technical and business matters. Work is highly independent. May assume a team lead role for the work group. Typically requires 7+ years of related experience. This is a senior level IT professional position. Under the direction of the Software Engineering Manager, is responsible for database design, configuration, database management, updates, collaborating with the Software Engineers on database design and recommending solid database structure. Database management is shared among others in this same position. Incumbent is also responsible to perform at the highest level, enterprise‐wide system analysis, layout activities, system design, interface design, and evaluation of user requirements for a variety of applications. Plans and conducts preliminary studies of potential applications and prepares design proposals to reflect cost, time and alternative actions to satisfy existing and future needs. Translates detailed design specifications into computer program instructions, debugs complex programs, and conducts system testing. Modifies, maintains and updates existing applications. Works with business partners to ensure satisfaction and verify that software needs are consistently met. Participates in all phases of the Application Development Cycle. Serves the Software Engineering Team in an expert capacity regarding a specific subject area. Mentors other Software Engineers. Incumbents are normally widely recognized for their achievements, technical expertise and meritorious standing within their professional field. Baccalaureate degree in computer science or other field of computer programming and at least eight years of paid employment in the field of computer programming or an equivalent combination of education and experience substituting on a year‐for‐year basis. $94,282 $106,157 $121,522 $96,702 $108,396 $124,452 Database Engineer IV Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Database Engineer Administrates organization's database, using database management system to organize and store data. Ascertains user requirements, creates computer databases, and tests and coordinates changes. Interacts with development and end‐user personnel to determine application data access requirements, transaction rates, volume analysis, and other pertinent data required to develop and maintain integrated databases. Ensures performance of database. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$80,511 $88,150 $95,742 $83,193 $91,113 $98,997 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$86,311 $94,482 $102,565 $89,186 $97,658 $106,053 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$95,635 $105,824 $115,760 $99,264 $109,830 $120,152 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$102,452 $113,232 $123,658 $106,339 $117,519 $128,350 Overall 100%$91,227 $100,422 $109,431 $94,496 $104,030 $113,388 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$99,900 $109,900 $120,200 $103,100 $114,200 $126,400 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$105,300 $115,900 $126,800 $108,700 $120,400 $133,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$92,200 $101,400 $111,000 $95,200 $105,400 $116,600 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$97,200 $107,000 $117,000 $100,400 $111,200 $123,000 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$99,500 $109,400 $119,700 $102,700 $113,700 $125,800 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$104,900 $115,400 $126,200 $108,300 $119,900 $132,700 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$91,800 $101,000 $110,500 $94,800 $105,000 $116,100 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$96,800 $106,500 $116,500 $99,900 $110,700 $122,500 Overall 100%$98,450 $108,313 $118,488 $101,638 $112,563 $124,550 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 25.0%$93,315 $101,973 $112,444 $94,802 $106,887 $119,801 Salt Lake Metro 25.0%$93,780 $102,480 $113,004 $95,274 $107,418 $120,397 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 25.0%$105,960 $113,299 $121,399 $106,144 $113,299 $121,500 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 25.0%$87,325 $96,188 $107,949 $88,844 $96,188 $112,993 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$95,095 $103,485 $113,699 $96,266 $105,948 $118,673 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Software Engineer III $118,870 Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Software Engineer Develops, researches, designs, implements, tests, and evaluates software and systems, in conjunction with hardware product development, that enable computers to perform their applications, applying principles and techniques of computer science, engineering, and mathematical analysis. Economic Research Institute $94,924 $104,073 $113,873 $97,466 $107,514 Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Validate and document completion of testing and development. Verify fixes. Find bugs, defects, and regressions. Design, implement, execute and debug information technology test cases and scripts. Automate test cases. Quality Assurance; Broadly applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Solves a diverse range of complex problems, working with limited direction. Frequently interfaces with internal/external customers and makes significant contributions to department goals and planning efforts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5‐7 years of related professional experience. Software Development Engineer ‐ Senior/Career Level Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SOFTWARE ENGINEER III ‐ 002145 2 $97,448 $97,448 Designs and develops software applications. Performs coding, debugging, testing and troubleshooting throughout the application development process. May direct a few junior level software engineers. Requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a manager. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Typically requires 4 to 7 years of related experience. Under the direction of the Software Engineering Team Manager, incumbents in this job series are responsible for performing analysis, layout activities, and evaluation of user requirements for a variety of applications. A career ladder exists for this job series, and incumbents may be promoted based on knowledge, skills and abilities as defined by the department. Plans and conducts preliminary studies of potential applications and prepares design proposals to reflect cost, time and alternative actions to satisfy existing and future needs. Translates detailed design specifications into an application, debugs, and conducts system testing. Modifies, maintains and updates existing applications. Serves on project teams as a resource in one or more specific subjects. SOFTWARE ENGINEER III ‐ Delivers and maintains web and desktop applications using tools used within the department. May be considered an expert on one or more existing tools in use. Meets with customers to define system requirements, design database and table design layout, and design and create reports. Serves as a technical advisor to customers and to all lower levels of software engineers. Must be able to communicate, organize and perform their duties consistently in an exceptional manner. Will usually be responsible for 5 or more existing web and desktop applications. Requires six years’ education and/or related work experience, as well as the knowledge, skills and abilities commensurate with this level. Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:At Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$68,211 $74,764 $81,347 $73,277 $80,406 $87,601 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$72,374 $79,311 $86,261 $77,712 $85,249 $92,835 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$79,048 $87,943 $97,122 $85,888 $95,566 $105,611 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$83,780 $93,156 $102,771 $90,971 $101,158 $111,664 Overall 100%$75,853 $83,794 $91,875 $81,962 $90,595 $99,428 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$84,600 $95,000 $108,300 $87,100 $98,200 $113,000 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$85,500 $96,100 $109,400 $88,100 $99,300 $114,200 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$82,500 $92,700 $105,600 $85,000 $95,800 $110,200 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$83,400 $93,700 $106,800 $85,900 $96,800 $111,400 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$84,200 $94,700 $107,800 $86,800 $97,800 $112,500 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$85,100 $95,700 $109,000 $87,700 $98,900 $113,700 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$82,200 $92,300 $105,200 $84,600 $95,400 $109,700 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$83,100 $93,300 $106,300 $85,500 $96,500 $110,900 Overall 100%$83,825 $94,188 $107,300 $86,338 $97,338 $111,950 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$83,949 $96,293 $105,898 $84,626 $97,243 $107,231 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%$89,100 $102,200 $112,396 $89,818 $103,209 $113,810 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 33.0%$74,824 $85,046 $103,552 $77,440 $86,037 $108,206 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$82,689 $94,590 $107,333 $84,020 $95,573 $109,790 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Troubleshoots and develops technical solutions related to software and setup errors for field engineers, technicians, and customers. Creates workaround procedures when standard procedures have failed and ensures issues are resolved in a timely fashion. Escalates urgent problems requiring more in‐depth knowledge to appropriate internal resources. Requires a bachelor's degree in area of specialty. Typically reports to a manager. Typically requires 4 to 7 years of related experience. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. The Software Support Administrator III is a member of the Software Support Team. Members of the Software Support Team provide system administration and support, project planning, technical consulting, and business and data analysis for software and technological solutions used throughout the city. Team members direct the implementation of large scale, long term, and difficult, custom software implementations (i.e. enterprise resource planning, computer aided dispatch, work order management systems, business intelligence and analytics, etc.) and provide ongoing support. Team members serve as project focal point and liaison between the city departments, IMS Department staff, and system vendors. They are responsible for analyzing and solving complex problems associated with large computer system implementations. Exercises discretion and independent judgment in the performance of their duties. The Software Support Administrator III works independently, and serves as a project lead as necessary, in analyzing, administering and maintaining City applications. The Administrator III has more experience and a higher skill set than the Administrator II. Degree in computer science or other closely related field and at least 6‐8 years paid employment in the field. An equivalent combination of education and experience may be substituted on a year‐for‐year basis. $80,789 $90,857 $102,169 $84,106 $94,502 $107,056 Software Support Engineer III Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Software Support Admin (Hybrid) Software Project Mgr (30%) ‐ Manages the design and installation of control systems and software applications in an effective and efficient manner. Plans and develops software projects, taking into account cost and time estimations, scheduling, staffing, and risk management. Estimates total costs to develop the software product and the total time required to complete the project. Schedules required staff and other resources based on skills and needs. Software Implementation Specialist (70%) ‐ Coordinates the installation and implementation of new software, and assures client timelines and requirements are met. Evaluates and thoroughly tests new software to make sure that clients who use the program will be able to use it effectively and will not encounter problems. Provides feedback, suggestions, and input to the development team. Confers with clients to determine the requirements and scope of the installation and to identify potential future enhancements. Schedules and conducts training to ensure clients can fully use the software to meet their needs. Economic Research Institute Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Answer queries and resolve issues with software applications, and escalate or close tickets as necessary. Train users on specific applications and document creation. Maintain, troubleshoot, and repair computer systems, including remote installations. Provide expertise and technical knowledge about an application or suite of applications. Software Developer/Engineer (Applications); Broadly applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Solves a diverse range of complex problems, working with limited direction. Frequently interfaces with internal/external customers and makes significant contributions to department goals and planning efforts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5‐ 7 years of related professional experience. Software Support Specialist ‐ Senior/Career Level Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SOFTWARE SUPPORT ADMIN III ‐ 001861 4 $96,294 $92,477 Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$71,897 $79,319 $86,886 $74,767 $82,519 $90,438 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$74,867 $82,590 $90,436 $77,857 $85,922 $94,133 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$84,802 $94,944 $105,019 $88,704 $99,302 $109,851 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$88,277 $98,765 $109,147 $92,339 $103,299 $114,170 Overall 100%$79,961 $88,905 $97,872 $83,417 $92,761 $102,148 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$74,600 $83,700 $93,800 $76,400 $86,500 $98,500 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$75,700 $85,000 $95,200 $77,500 $87,800 $99,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$69,800 $78,300 $87,800 $71,500 $80,900 $92,100 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$70,800 $79,500 $89,100 $72,500 $82,100 $93,500 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$74,300 $83,400 $93,400 $76,100 $86,100 $98,100 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$75,400 $84,600 $94,800 $77,200 $87,400 $99,500 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$69,500 $78,000 $87,400 $71,200 $80,600 $91,700 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$70,500 $79,100 $88,700 $72,200 $81,800 $93,100 Overall 100%$72,575 $81,450 $91,275 $74,325 $84,150 $95,800 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 100.0%No Data Available $95,701 No Data Available No Data Available $95,701 No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$0 $95,701 $0 $0 $95,701 $0 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 16.7%$67,830 $80,274 $95,574 $75,786 $82,008 $99,042 Utah | All 16.7%$67,116 $80,274 $95,370 $74,154 $82,008 $98,226 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 16.7%$69,360 $77,418 $105,672 $70,278 $77,826 $105,672 Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 16.7%$69,360 $77,418 $105,672 $70,278 $77,826 $105,672 SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 16.7%$67,422 $76,704 $95,268 $68,034 $77,622 $100,164 Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 16.7%$67,422 $76,704 $95,268 $68,034 $77,622 $100,164 Overall 100%$68,099 $78,148 $98,824 $71,108 $79,168 $101,510 Survey Information CompData Buyer II (Senior) Acquires, purchases, and negotiates materials, equipment, and supplies for requisitioned material. Negotiates with vendors to obtain quotations, prices, and delivery times. Evaluates vendor quotes and services to determine if they are compatible with organization objectives. Oversees purchasing logs and records to ensure accuracy and follow through. Monitors quality of goods by reviewing costs, schedules, timeliness of delivery, and conformance to specifications. Trains at least two or more buyers on proper purchasing skills. Possesses knowledge of extrinsic factors relating to commodities purchased is needed. Bachelor's degree required and five years experience. Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Inventory existing property and conduct audits. Take corrective action when defective goods are received. Test and evaluate sample products, draw up and approve requisitions, and ensure adequate supply. Research and identify vendors, and negotiate to achieve desired quality, price, and timetables. Procure and contract for goods and services in a specific industry. This is the level of full competence that all professionals are expected to achieve in the function. Manages program and project implementation and makes significant contributions to department goals and planning efforts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5‐7 years of related professional experience. Purchasing Agent ‐ Senior/Career Level Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SR PURCHASING CONSULTANT ‐ 000537 1 $73,840 $73,840 Purchases materials, supplies and services at the most favorable terms for the organization. Qualifies vendors, evaluates bids, and negotiates prices and terms for purchased goods and services. Tracks purchases, monitors vendor quality, and maintains a current database of vendor information. Typically requires a bachelor's degree or equivalent. Typically reports to a manager. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Typically requires 4 ‐7 years of related experience. Under the direction of the Chief Procurement Officer, manages all procurement activities for Salt Lake City, with the exception of those requiring a written contract, and provides assistance to buyers on highly technical or complex bids. Responsible for facilitating and maintaining continuity of procurement activities within the City. Relies upon the Chief Procurement Officer for immediate facilitation, performance improvement assessment and leave requests. Serves as primary backup for Procurement Consultant for his/her assigned City Department(s). Has authority to approve expenditures up to $40,000 (involving single purchasing decision) and may authorize unlimited expenditures in the absence of the Chief Procurement Officer. Degree in procurement, economics, finance, business or related field and six years paid experience in purchasing goods, preferably with a government agency. Education and experience can be substituted one for the other to meet the academic requirement on a year‐for‐year basis. $73,545 $86,051 $95,990 $76,283 $68,170 $99,819 Senior Buyer Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Purchasing Supervisor Supervises buyers and purchasing staff involved in the external procurement of raw materials, parts, equipment, supplies, and services for an organization at minimal cost, consistent with delivery requirements and quality specifications. Oversees the selection and ordering of materials, supplies, and services from vendors; showings by manufacturing representatives, growers, or other sellers; or purchases on open market for cash, basing selection on nature of clientele or demand for specific commodity, merchandise, or other property, utilizing knowledge of various articles of commerce and experience as Buyer. Coordinates purchasing activities with user departments to maintain optimum inventory and buy levels. Develops, with upper management, and recommends changes to purchasing procedures and policies. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$85,625 $93,789 $101,883 $88,677 $97,161 $105,585 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$91,785 $100,490 $109,072 $95,057 $104,102 $113,036 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$102,478 $113,218 $123,731 $106,607 $117,769 $128,716 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$109,702 $120,998 $131,963 $114,121 $125,862 $137,279 Overall 100%$97,398 $107,124 $116,662 $101,116 $111,224 $121,154 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$99,900 $109,900 $120,200 $103,100 $114,200 $126,400 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$105,300 $115,900 $126,800 $108,700 $120,400 $133,300 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$92,200 $101,400 $111,000 $95,200 $105,400 $116,600 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$97,200 $107,000 $117,000 $100,400 $111,200 $123,000 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$99,500 $109,400 $119,700 $102,700 $113,700 $125,800 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$104,900 $115,400 $126,200 $108,300 $119,900 $132,700 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$91,800 $101,000 $110,500 $94,800 $105,000 $116,100 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$96,800 $106,500 $116,500 $99,900 $110,700 $122,500 Overall 100%$98,450 $108,313 $118,488 $101,638 $112,563 $124,550 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Salt Lake Metro 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 50.0%$119,496 $131,183 $144,189 $121,464 $134,846 $146,813 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 50.0%$117,956 $136,991 $151,397 $121,387 $139,206 $151,875 Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$118,726 $134,087 $147,793 $121,426 $137,026 $149,344 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 12.5% Utah | All 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 12.5% SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 12.5% Overall 100%$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Survey Information CompData No Data Available Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Write code to create single‐threaded, multi‐threaded or user interface event driven applications, either stand‐alone and those which access servers or services. Write, modify, and debug software for client applications. Use source debuggers and visual development environments. Test and document software for client applications. Software Developer/Engineer (Generic); Applies advanced principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments, and contributes to the development of new ideas and principles. Solves uniquely complex problems, working under consultative direction. Often speaks for the organization to internal/external customers and works on long‐range programs and objectives. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree (advanced degree preferred), 8‐10+ years of related professional experience. Software Developer ‐ Advanced Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SR SOFTWARE ENGINEER ‐ 002146 2 $108,753 $108,753 Designs and develops software applications. Performs coding, debugging, testing and troubleshooting throughout the application development process. May direct a few junior level software engineers. Requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a manager. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Typically requires 4 to 7 years of related experience. Under the direction of the Software Engineering Team Manager, incumbents in this job series are responsible for performing analysis, layout activities, and evaluation of user requirements for a variety of applications. A career ladder exists for this job series, and incumbents may be promoted based on knowledge, skills and abilities as defined by the department. Plans and conducts preliminary studies of potential applications and prepares design proposals to reflect cost, time and alternative actions to satisfy existing and future needs. Translates detailed design specifications into an application, debugs, and conducts system testing. Modifies, maintains and updates existing applications. Serves on project teams as a resource in one or more specific subjects. SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER – Delivers and maintains web and desktop applications using tools used within the department. Is considered an expert on many of the existing tools in use and understands relationships between existing legacy systems. Meets with customers to define system requirements, design database and table design layout, and design and create reports. Serves as a technical advisor to customers and to all levels of software engineers. Must be able to communicate, organize and perform their duties consistently in an exceptional manner. Will usually be responsible for 5 or more existing web and desktop applications. Requires eight years’ education and/or related work experience, as well as the knowledge, skills and abilities commensurate with this level. $104,858 $116,508 $127,648 $108,060 $120,271 $131,683 Senior Software Engineer Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Software Engineer Develops, researches, designs, implements, tests, and evaluates software and systems, in conjunction with hardware product development, that enable computers to perform their applications, applying principles and techniques of computer science, engineering, and mathematical analysis. Excludes paraprofessional positions. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Below Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$71,947 $79,093 $86,324 $74,703 $82,154 $89,710 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$74,622 $82,056 $89,549 $77,480 $85,232 $93,062 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$84,244 $93,927 $103,602 $87,967 $98,068 $108,180 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$87,396 $97,400 $107,353 $91,259 $101,694 $112,097 Overall 100%$79,552 $88,119 $96,707 $82,852 $91,787 $100,762 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$96,000 $105,100 $115,900 $98,800 $108,800 $121,100 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$98,300 $107,600 $118,700 $101,200 $111,400 $124,000 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$91,000 $99,600 $109,900 $93,700 $103,100 $114,800 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$93,200 $102,000 $112,500 $96,000 $105,600 $117,600 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$95,700 $104,800 $115,500 $98,500 $108,400 $120,700 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$98,000 $107,300 $118,300 $100,900 $111,000 $123,600 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$90,700 $99,300 $109,500 $93,400 $102,800 $114,500 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$92,900 $101,700 $112,200 $95,700 $105,300 $117,200 Overall 100%$94,475 $103,425 $114,063 $97,275 $107,050 $119,188 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 25.0%No Data Available $126,563 No Data Available No Data Available $126,563 No Data Available Salt Lake Metro 25.0%$102,138 $112,729 $123,706 $103,110 $115,959 $132,039 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 25.0%$105,850 $118,548 $132,589 $108,836 $124,097 $137,076 Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 25.0%$91,328 $107,831 $119,611 $94,233 $108,557 $120,386 Sector: Public Administration No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$99,772 $116,418 $125,302 $102,060 $118,794 $129,834 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$78,132 $100,980 $104,550 $79,968 $100,980 $113,016 Utah | All 50.0%$78,132 $100,980 $104,550 $79,968 $100,980 $113,016 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$78,132 $100,980 $104,550 $79,968 $100,980 $113,016 Survey Information CompData Systems Analyst II (Senior) Confers with user departments to identify system requirements, develop functional design specifications to meet requirements, and solve complex business problems. Analyzes and revises existing system logic. Assists user departments in developing procedures and provides user training. Provides guidance and training to lower level, less experienced analysts. Maintains a thorough understanding of the business functions, user needs, capacity, and limitations of equipment, operating time, and desired results in order to provide data solutions. Possesses strong interpersonal and communication skills and knowledge of two or more 4th generation programming languages and/or databases. Bachelor's degree in business, computer science, or related area required and six years experience. Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Research, design, implement, and troubleshoot information systems and technology solutions in support of business needs. Document help desk troubleshooting procedures, operations manuals, and user guidance. Systems; Broadly applies basic principles, theories, and concepts to job assignments. Solves a diverse range of complex problems, working with limited direction. Frequently interfaces with internal/external customers and makes significant contributions to department goals and planning efforts. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 5‐7 years of related professional experience. Systems Engineer ‐ Senior/Career Level Professional Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information SYSTEMS ENGINEER III ‐ 002571 1 $97,760 $97,760 Designs, develops, supports, and maintains the organization's systems infrastructure, including the implementation and design of hardware and software. Analyzes, develops, modifies, tests and maintains the system. Makes updates to system related installation documentation. Typically requires a bachelor's degree. Typically reports to a manager. Work is generally independent and collaborative in nature. Contributes to moderately complex aspects of a project. Typically requires 4 ‐7 years of related experience. Under the guidance of the Director of ITS, the System Engineering Team Manager, or a System Engineer III, oversees the daily activities of the citywide Servers and data. Responsible for performing professional Systems, engineering assignments, including analyzing systems, planning, designing, evaluating and selecting operating systems and associated hardware. Resolves interoperability problems to obtain operations across all platforms including: E‐mail, File Servers, file transfers, Systems Infrastructure and Backup systems. Configures systems to meet the needs of the user environments. Supports acquisition of hardware and software as well as vendor services as needed. Conducts assignments of considerable complexity pertaining to the evaluation and development of network systems applications. Responsible to mentor and train incumbents in other positions such as Systems Engineer I, Network Support Administrators and Field Services employees. System Engineer III ‐ Graduation from a four‐year accredited college with a bachelor’s degree in computer science or related field plus 6‐8 years related experience in the administration of Servers. Equivalent combination of education and experience substituted on a year‐for‐year basis. Possession of one (or more) of the following certifications may be required: Microsoft Certified System Administrator (MCSA), Exchange, SharePoint, or other pertinent certification. Expert Knowledge with server hardware, network devices, security devices, peripherals, and operating systems, including installation procedures, architecture, and troubleshooting techniques. This is the highest individual contributor level within the System Engineering team and is ultimately responsible to find solutions to complex issues while providing mentoring and training to those on the network engineering team. Makes recommendations to the System Engineering Manager on hiring, disciplinary actions and/or discharge of subordinates. $87,983 $102,235 $110,155 $90,539 $104,653 $115,700 Systems Engineer III Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Systems Engineer Oversees engineering activities of an organization's information systems. Plans, designs, develops, evaluates, tests, and integrates an organization's systems infrastructure, including the implementation and design of hardware and software. Economic Research Institute Job Title: Avg. 25th Base: Incumbent(s):Avg. 50th Base: Average Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 75th Base: Median Pay of Incumbents in Position:Avg. 25th TCC: Base:Avg. 50th TCC: TCC:Avg. 75th TCC: Above, Below, At Market:Above Market Job Description: Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Wasatch Front, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$55,239 $59,998 $64,617 $56,744 $61,655 $66,432 Salt Lake City, $350M Budget, City Gov't 25%$56,912 $61,862 $66,669 $58,463 $63,570 $68,541 Wasatch Front, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$60,766 $67,205 $73,494 $62,785 $69,430 $75,935 Salt Lake City, $367M Revenue, All Industries 25%$62,661 $69,362 $75,899 $64,743 $71,658 $78,420 Overall 100%$58,895 $64,607 $70,170 $60,684 $66,578 $72,332 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Salt Lake City | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$53,200 $61,900 $70,800 $54,100 $63,300 $73,600 Salt Lake City | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$55,300 $64,300 $73,600 $56,300 $65,800 $76,500 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$49,100 $57,100 $65,300 $50,000 $58,400 $67,900 Salt Lake City | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$51,100 $59,400 $67,900 $51,900 $60,700 $70,600 Utah | All Industries | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$53,000 $61,600 $70,500 $53,900 $63,000 $73,300 Utah | All Industries | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$55,100 $64,000 $73,300 $56,000 $65,500 $76,200 Utah | Public Administration | $200M ‐ $500M Revenues 12.5%$48,900 $56,900 $65,100 $49,800 $58,200 $67,600 Utah | Public Administration | 1,000 ‐ 3,000 FTEs 12.5%$50,900 $59,100 $67,600 $51,700 $60,400 $70,300 Overall 100%$52,075 $60,538 $69,263 $52,963 $61,913 $72,000 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile Utah 33.0%$48,828 $52,650 $63,557 $48,828 $52,650 $63,557 Salt Lake Metro 34.0%$47,802 $49,392 $62,039 $47,802 $49,392 $62,039 FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 3,500 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Net Revenue: 100M to less than 500M USD 33.0%No Data Available $84,772 No Data Available No Data Available $84,772 No Data Available Sector: Public Administration 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$48,315 $62,143 $62,798 $48,315 $62,143 $62,798 Survey: Job Title: Job Description Scope Weight Base 25th Percentile Base 50th Percentile Base 75th Percentile TCC 25th Percentile TCC 50th Percentile TCC 75th Percentile SLC/Northern Utah Area | All 50.0%$45,594 $58,650 $64,872 $46,104 $60,690 $68,034 Utah | All 50.0%$50,388 $58,650 $65,382 $51,918 $60,690 $68,136 SLC/Northern UT Area | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Not‐for‐Profit 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | FTEs: 1,000 to fewer than 5,000 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available SLC/Northern UT Area | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Utah | Gross Revenue: $300M ‐ $999.9M 0.0%No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available No Data Available Overall 100%$47,991 $58,650 $65,127 $49,011 $60,690 $68,085 Survey Information CompData Warehouse Supervisor Supervises the day‐to‐day activities and work performance of warehouse staff. Assesses staffing and material levels and ensures supplies are adequate for work needs. Monitors flow of materials through the warehouse process and makes recommendations for process improvements. Provides on‐the‐job training for warehouse employees in all areas of their job duties. Associate's degree preferred and three years of experience. Salt Lake City Non‐Represented Employee Compensation Analysis 2022 Survey Information MarketPay by Payscale Assists in warehouse training and mentoring. Prioritize workloads in warehouse. Provide clear direction to warehouse department leads. Warehouse; Supervises and monitors the day‐ to‐day activities of a group of (typically non‐exempt) staff. Organizes work and provides direct supervision to subordinates. Typically requires: Bachelor's degree, 3+ years of related professional experience. Warehouse Management ‐ Supervisor Position Information Market Data Summary ‐ Weighted Averages Survey Information WAREHOUSE SUPERVISOR ‐ 002249 3 $63,412 $65,062 Supervises the overall warehouse operations and daily activities of staff. Oversees inventory levels, monitors the safety of goods, and ensures the efficient usage of warehouse space. Operates an applicable system to update inventory status and respond to stakeholder's inquiries. May require an associate degree or its equivalent. Typically reports to a manager. Supervises a small group of para‐professional staff in an organization characterized by highly transactional or repetitive processes. Contributes to the development of processes and procedures. Thorough knowledge of functional area under supervision. Typically requires 3 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. Reporting to a section manager or supervisor, administers all warehouse operations for a designated department. Principally responsible for requisitioning, processing, receiving, and disbursing tools, parts and maintenance materials using a computerized and/or manual inventory control system. This position is also responsible for coordinating general warehouse activities with other work units or City departments and for the direct supervision of warehouse staff. Associate's Degree or two years' post high school study in accounting, business administration, or a closely related field plus five years' experience in warehouse operations including inventory administration, one year of which must have been in a supervisory capacity. Excepting the supervisory requirement, experience and education may be substituted, one for the other, on a year‐for‐year basis. $54,484 $61,484 $66,839 $52,743 $62,831 $68,804 Warehouse Supervisor Survey Information CompAnalyst Market Database Warehouse Supervisor Supervises and coordinates daily activities of workers engaged in materials movement or handling, receiving, loading, unloading, transporting, stacking, order filling, shipping, and maintaining stock in a storeroom or warehouse. Reviews shipping or receiving orders and requests for movement of materials and products. Develops work schedules and assigns work to subordinates. Economic Research Institute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of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards Budget Analysts DATE:March 22, 2022 RE: Budget Amendment Number Six FY2022 MOTION 1 – PARTIALLY ADOPT I move that the Council adopt an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2021-22 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document only for items as shown on the motion sheet. Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the individual items being approved below; they are listed for reference. The budget amendment is still open. A-3: Healthcare Innovation – Biohive ($25,000 from General Fund Balance) -Note this would be six-months funding to cover services provided since the City’s membership expired in September; the Council requests that the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for FY2023 include full year funding A-8: Violent Crimes Unit COPS Hiring Grant City Match (Budget Neutral using $1,181,460 of Vacancy Savings in Police Department) Items Not Adopted A-7: Restore July Fireworks Budget ($25,000 one-time from General Fund Balance) E-4: State of Utah, Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail Grant ($1.3 million) I-2: Rescope $1.3 Million of Parks Impact Fees as Match to State Grant for Five New Foothills Trailheads (Budget Neutral) MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke, Sylvia Richards, and Allison Rowland Budget and Policy Analysts DATE:March 22, 2022 RE: Budget Amendment Number Six FY2022 ________________________________________________________________________________ NEW INFORMATION At the February 15 briefing the Council reviewed updated information, responses from the Administration to the Council questions and held an initial discussion about item A-8: requesting 10 new police officers for a Violent Crimes Unit and the City’s growing number of programs to diversify public safety response options. The Council took a unanimous straw poll to support nine months of funding for item A-1: Suazo Business Center to align the ongoing membership with the City’s annual budget cycle. The Council discussed potential partial funding for item A-2: Biohive or adding it to the upcoming annual budget. On March 1, the Council closed the public hearing and adopted most of the items in this budget amendment. Five items were held for more information and discussion as listed below. A-3: Healthcare Innovation – Biohive ($50,000 from General Fund Balance) Four options the Council could consider for this item are: a) Decline to approve any funding and request that this item be added to the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for FY2023. b) Approve $25,000 for services provided since the contract expired in September and then ask that further funding requests be added to the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for FY2023. c) Approve $37,500 which includes item b) above plus an additional three months of services to reach the end of the current fiscal year. The next annual budget would then determine whether or not the City continues paying for the services. d) Approve the full funding request of $50,000, which would likely result in a FY2023 mid-year budget amendment request. A-7: Restore July Fireworks Budget ($25,000 one-time from General Fund Balance) Potential options the Council could consider for this item are: a) Decline to approve funding for July holiday celebrations this calendar year b) Approve $25,000 for alternative celebrations this coming July that do not include fireworks. c) Put $25,000 into a holding account to be carried forward into next fiscal year and combined with $25,000 in the FY2023 annual budget for a larger alternative celebration of July holidays in calendar year 2023. This would provide a total budget of $50,000. Project Timeline: Set Date: February 1, 2022 1st Briefing: February 1, 2022 2nd Briefing: February 8, 2022 3rd Briefing: February 15, 2022 Public Hearing: February 15, 2022 Partial Adoption: March 1, 2022 4th Briefing: March 22, 2022 Potential Action: March 22, 2022 Page | 2 d) Approve the full funding request of $25,000 for fireworks shows this coming July with the understanding that the event would be cancelled if AQI is 100 or greater or if the U.S. drought monitor exceeds 1.2. A-8: Violent Crimes Unit COPS Hiring Grant City Match (Budget Neutral using $1,181,460 of Vacancy Savings in Police Department) See Attachment 3 for a one-page summary from the Department Letter of support from Racial Equity in Policing (REP) Commission The Police Department sent a letter (Attachment 2) from the Chair and Vice Chair of the REP Commission expressing support for three proposals to increase police officer staffing listed below. The letter links the REP Commission leadership support to the full Commission’s training recommendation last year that the officers be “specifically trained in bias, de-escalation, and histories of our city’s neighborhoods and that these officers regularly connect with the in-house mental health services.” The letter also indicates all officers should be Crisis Intervention Training or CIT certified. The Department is working to get all officers CIT certified including a requirement that the certification be maintained over time. -10 police officers for a Violent Crimes Unit using DOJ COPS Grant funding (item A-8 in Budget Amendment #6) -One additional sergeant for the Special Victims Unit using General Fund dollars (item A-5 in Budget Amendment #6 which the Council approved on March 1) -15 patrol officers and three sergeants for issues at and around the two homeless resource centers in the City using the State FY22 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant funding o This is pending the Legislature’s decision on potential law changes and the State’s decision on grant award amounts and allowable uses Budget and Vacancy Savings Clarification The Police Department estimates vacancy savings will be $1.8 million when FY2022 ends on June 30, 2022. The Department clarified the required match must be appropriated by the Council to meet the grant conditions and avoid creating a supplanting issue. Grant Deadline The current conditions of the grant require the Council to approve the local matching funds by March 31, 2022. It’s unclear whether an extension could be requested for a longer grant period and later funding deadline. Minimizing Disruption to Patrol and Community Policing Functions At the February 15 briefing, Council Members raised questions about sequencing options that would launch the Violent Crimes Unit without causing significant disruptions from experienced patrol officers transferring out of community policing and into the new Unit. The Department is exploring multiple staffing scenarios to identify a preferred option. One option to avoid temporary service level reductions in community policing and patrol could be one squad of the two in the Violent Crimes Unit being filled, waiting for the Department to be closer to full staffing of police officers, and then the second squad being filled. The Department also notes the Unit would conduct proactive enforcement complementing existing community policing efforts such as potentially freeing up time for patrol officers. The grant requires the Violent Crime Unit be staffed once the officers complete all training. A police officer typically requires 10 months from basic academy training to completed field trainings. Reaching Full Staffing of Police Officers The Department plans to reach, or be close to, full staffing of sworn police officers by July 2023. However, 60 officers would still have several months of field training remaining before being available for regular patrol duties. This timeline includes: -Basic academies with 30 cadets each in May 2022, January 2023 and May 2023 -Continual hiring of lateral officers as available -Continual efforts to re-hire officers that left the Department Page | 3 E-4: State of Utah, Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail Grant ($1.3 million), and, I-2: Rescope $1.3 Million of Parks Impact Fees as Match to State Grant for Five New Foothills Trailheads (Budget Neutral) The deadline for the City to use the grant funding for item E-4 if June 30, 2023. The Department is requesting an extension from the State since the timeline for the capital improvements will likely exceed the current deadline. The Council requested a briefing on the Foothill Trails System Plan implementation status from the Parks and Public Lands Department before considering votes on items E-4 and I-2, in which case, the Council may wish to continue holding this item open until further discussion can take place. Some specific topics Council Members mentioned for the briefing include: -Plan implementation work completed or paused to date -Overview of the funds and projects that are on hold per the FY2022 annual budget contingency -Status of the independent audit / professional review of trails and timeline for the resulting written evaluation report -Additional public engagement conducted or planned -How the five new trailheads requesting funding in Budget Amendment #6 relates to the pause in work from the annual budget contingency  Information below was provided to the Council at earlier briefings  At the February 8 briefing, the Council finished reviewing remaining items that weren’t discussed during the February 1 briefing. The discussion included potentially adding requests for new fulltime employees to the upcoming FY2023 annual budget deliberations so all the City’s competing needs could be considered in context together. Summarized below are Administration responses to the Council’s follow up questions. A-1: Suazo Business Center The Council asked when the City’s current membership expires, how much funding would be needed to continue the membership until the annual budget (to align the membership and annual funding cycles), and if other membership levels are available. The Administration indicated the City’s membership expired in September 2021. The Department reports services have been voluntarily continued while the funding request goes through the City’s budget process. Funding nine months at a cost of $18,750 would cover October 2021 through June 2022. Then, the full annual cost of $25,000 would need to be included in the next annual budget to continue membership. There is no higher or lower-level membership for governments. However, the State and County have chosen to provide funding above the $25,000 membership level. The County provides $130,000 annually towards the Center’s work supporting minority-owned businesses located within county limits, and the State through the Governor’s Office of Economic Development (GOED) provides $267,500 annually for services offered statewide. A-3: Healthcare Innovation Branding aka Biohive The Council asked when the City’s current membership expires, how much funding would be needed to continue the membership until the annual budget (to align the membership and annual funding cycles), if this is an ongoing or one-time expense, and how the first $50,000 appropriation was spent. The Administration indicated the City’s membership expired in September 2021. The Department reports services have been voluntarily continued while the funding request goes through the City’s budget process. Funding nine months at a cost of $37,500 would cover October 2021 through June 2022. This expense was originally identified as one-time. However, the Department states the expense should be considered ongoing and would need to be included in the next annual budget. The first $50,000 appropriation was used for the Utah Life Science Summit pandemic recovery information and services. The funds also contributed to a Biohive newsletter, branding and marketing. A-4: Fix the Bricks The Council asked what additional resources and program changes could decrease wait times for residents, if FEMA has any timeliness requirements or expectations for use of grant funding information on the program’s geographic Page | 4 equity. The Administration responded greater involvement of existing employees in the Housing Stability Division may be able to decrease wait times for program participants. In addition, the City is applying for State funding to increase the number of single-family homes participating in the program and potentially expand the program to multifamily and commercial properties. The City requested and received grant agreement extensions related to the pandemic and the March 2020 earthquake. Applications will be submitted for additional rounds of Fix the Bricks grant funding from FEMA. The Administration is exploring funding options to assist low- and moderate-income homeowners with covering the 25% match requirement but has not identified preferred funding options at this time. Other federal funds such as CDBG dollars are ineligible for covering the 25% match. The IMS Department is working with the Housing Stability Division to map program recipients and those on the waiting list. This information would allow the City to see relative participation rates between neighborhoods. A 2019 analysis showed most program applicants on the waiting list were from high- and middle-income areas. A-6: Public Safety Building Access Control Upgrade and Support The Council asked if there is a State or Federal deadline for meeting security compliance rules and whether there are any other time sensitivities the Council should know. The Administration responded there is no specific deadline date, but the risk of a security failure increases the longer the original system is used. The City is experiencing four to six month delays in server and network infrastructure orders which are needed for the system upgrade. Similar delays are expected for parts needed to repair the current system in case of failure. A-7: Restore July Fireworks Shows Funding The Council asked for any data showing that personal fireworks use increases when large public fireworks shows are unavailable. No such data currently exists to identify the impact, if any, of large public fireworks shows on personal fireworks usage. The Fire Department suggests community level risks may anecdotally be lower when large public fireworks shows are available. The Administration reiterated that the fireworks shows would be cancelled if the Air Quality Index or AQI exceeds 100 or if the U.S. Drought Monitor exceeds level 1.2. The City would receive a full refund if the show is cancelled more than 10 days in advance. A-9: Arts Council Staff Increase of 3 FTES The Council asked for clarification about to what extent, if any, the three additional FTEs requested would perform work for the nonprofit vs. the City. At the time of publishing this staff report, a small group meeting was being scheduled with the Administration to discuss this request. A-12: Citywide Equity Study The Council asked for a status update on the equity study. The study is expected to be completed August 2022 assuming additional funding is approved as requested in this budget amendment. The additional study tasks are focused on outreach to and findings related to the City’s Westside. The best place for the public to learn more as the study proceeds is the project webpage: www.keenindependent.com/saltlakecityequity2021/ Note that the webpage is currently being updated to show completed work and tasks in progress. The Administration provided the follow status update: “In 2021, Keen Independent Research Team administered equity surveys to employees, community members, residents, focus groups with strong ties to SLC, and HRC/REP/AAC commissions. They have analyzed all virtual workshop responses from external and internal participants. Also, Keen created and collected completed equity matrices that track the equity, inclusion, and belonging efforts of all City departments. They received all of this information at the end of 2021 and are currently collaborating with the Chief Equity Officer to meet with departments and analyze completed matrices. The findings from these matrices and analysis will be included in the final equity report. Drafting of the EI&B plan is still in progress but at least 90% complete.” B-1: ARPA Authorized HUD HOME Grant Funding for Admin and Planning Funds Page | 5 The Council asked is the 5% requested the maximum allowed by HUD for administration of the grant, will new employees be hired, will the funds pay for existing employees and additional info on the consultant contract. Council staff met with Housing Stability Division staff who shared the following details. - The HOME-ARPA grant has a 15% maximum for the costs of administering it. HUD is allowing early access to 5% (the amount of funding requested in this budget amendment) for staff to create the community assessment and allocation plan. The remainder of the grant funds may not be used until HUD approves the plan and the Council authorizes the budget. - The Division is not hiring new employees to administer the HOME-ARPA grant. - Most of the $176,660 will be used to pay existing employees for time working on administration of the HOME-ARPA grant this fiscal year and over the next few years. Staff have attended trainings, webinars, and weekly meetings with consultants to work on developing the HUD required community assessment and allocation plan. Some positions in the Division are funded by multiple grants proportional to the amount of work spent on eligible activities administering each grant and are not entirely covered by General Fund budget. - The Division has an existing contract with Zions Public Finance which runs concurrently with the 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan. HUD requires the City have the plan and update it to reflect allowable reuses, Council-identified spending priorities, grant funds received and many other details. $25,000 was encumbered under the contract from last fiscal year and is being used this fiscal year for developing the community assessment and allocation plan. The County and City are partnering on the effort to split these costs and streamline engagement with community stakeholders. HUD does not allow the use of HOME- ARPA grant funds on consultants until the community assessment and allocation plan are approved. The Division decided to use encumbered funds for the consultant to speed up development of those documents instead of adding to existing staff’s workload. Approximately $15,000 of the $176,660 could be used to reimburse the Division for use of the encumbered City funds. E-4: State of Utah, Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail Grant The Council asked the Parks and Public Lands Department how this project relates to the pause in work from the FY2022 annual budget contingency for implementing the Foothills Trails Plan. At the time of publishing this staff report a response from the Department was pending. Potential Council-added item: I-2: Rescope $1.3 Million of Parks Impact Fees as Match to State Grant for Five New Foothills Trailheads (Budget Neutral) At the February 8 briefing, the Council discussed the potential need to rescope funding approved as part of FY2022 CIP for two new trailheads in the Foothills. Item E-4 in this budget amendment is a $1.3 million State grant for five new trailheads in the Foothills. The Public Lands Department wants to use the CIP funding as a match to the State grant funding. This would require rescoping the CIP funding to be allowed to use on the five trailhead locations identified in the State grant application instead of the two specifically approved by the Council. The two trailheads using the CIP funding are also included in the five trailheads receiving the grant funding. 10 New Police Officers and Diversifying Public Safety Response Options The below item has not been discussed at earlier budget amendment briefings. This is part of a larger discussion about the City’s efforts to diversify public safety response options to better match the variety of situations experienced by people contacting the City for help. A-8: Violent Crimes Unit COPS Hiring Grant City Match ($1,181,460 from General Fund Balance) (Staff Note: The Council has requested additional information about other staffing and response model changes that the Police Department has put into place so that this request can be evaluated in the context of overall Department services and public safety. A briefing on this broader conversation will be scheduled once the information is available. The Council has requested that this budget amendment item be held until after that briefing, but this information is included for the purposes of the public hearing.) In 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) awarded a $1.25 million COPS Hiring Grant to the City for 10 new police officers. The grant requires the City to match funding and maintain employment of the new officers for three years. Over the grant period, the federal funding covers approximately 25% of the total cost and the City pays the other 75%. This funding request covers the FY2022 City match including new vehicles, computers and other Page | 6 equipment. The City match for ongoing personnel costs would be included in the FY2023 and FY2024 annual budgets and is estimated at $1.1 million. The 10 new patrol officers would form a new Violent Crimes Unit. Note that this would be in addition to Project Safe Neighborhoods which is a partnership between local, state and federal law enforcement agencies to reduce gun violence. The new officers would also participate in investigations and patrols. The Police Department is requesting DOJ approval for one of the 10 new officers to be a sergeant overseeing the Violent Crimes Unit. The City received COPS hiring grants several times before. The new police officers partially funded by the grant were retained and moved to be fully funded by the General Fund when the grant period ended. At the time of publishing this staff report, the Administration was preparing information about how this request fits into the City’s efforts to diversity public safety response options. In addition, Council staff is working with the Administration on creating a Council-requested infographic summarizing the several alternative response options. Policy Questions: 29 New Police Officers from Three Requests – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to brief the Council about plans to hire 29 new police officers which is composed of three separate requests listed below. The briefing could also include civilian staffing updates and efforts to diversify civilian-led public safety responses such as social workers, old police reports and traffic enforcement. o 10 patrol police officers for Violent Crimes Unit using DOJ COPS Grant funding (this item A-8) o 15 patrol officers and three sergeants for issues at and around the two homeless resource centers in the City using the State FY22 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant funding (pending Legislature decision on grant award amount and Council approval) o One additional sergeant for the Special Victims Unit using General Fund dollars (item A-5 above) Consider Request in Annual Budget Context – The Council may wish to consider if the new FTEs would be better evaluated in context of the annual budget and all the City’s competing needs. REP Commission Review – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if the additional staffing proposals have been presented to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission for review and feedback.  Information below was provided to the Council at earlier briefings  Budget Amendment Number Six includes thirty-five proposed amendments and requested changes to seven funds. Total expenditures coming from fund balance are $2,701,648. The Council may wish to note that the Administration is proposing to add sixteen ongoing FTE’s using Fund Balance, and those positions would need to be added to the upcoming annual budget. If all the items are adopted as proposed, then Fund Balance would be $29,721,935 or 21.29% above the 13% minimum target established by the Council in FY2020. State law was updated and set a maximum General Fund Balance limit of 35%. The increase is a result of higher- than-expected revenues and unspent funds dropping to Fund Balance at the end of FY2021. The Finance Department will be available at the briefing to provide a more detailed revenues update as summarized in the table later in this report. Inflation Impacts for Upcoming FY2023 Annual Budget Although there are positive revenue and fund balance reports, staff wanted to mention that there will likely be several inflationary impacts that may offset that positive news. Some departments have mentioned they expect significant cost increases for existing services and contract renewals as part of the upcoming FY2023 annual budget. For example, item A-13 in this budget amendment represents a 36% budget increase for fuel purchases. In addition, the CIP Cost Overrun Account is less able to offset project cost increases in response to pandemic-related construction supplies inflation so either project scopes are reduced, or additional funding may be needed. The FY2022 annual budget included significant use of one-time funding for ongoing expenses which will need to have ongoing revenue identified in future fiscal years to continue. The Council may wish to consider if some proposed items in this budget amendment would be better evaluated during the annual budget with the full context of the City’s competing needs. Page | 7 Revenue for FY2022 Budget Adjustments The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for Fiscal Year 2022. The Finance Department will be available at the briefing to review individual revenue line-item changes. According to the Administration, projections for fiscal year 2021 were better than expected, while projections for fiscal year 2022 continue to trend above budget. Sales tax for the first quarter was well above budget and the prior year. Franchise tax is lagging below budget from a decrease in water franchise ($250,000) and telephone Page | 8 ($150,000) franchise taxes. Other notable increases include licenses which are above budget driven by increases in airport parking taxes and innkeepers’ tax. Permits remain very strong with increases in plan check fees and building permits. Field reservations, land leases and building leases are leading to an increase in Charges, Fees and Rentals. Notable decreases include a decrease in moving violations and justice court fines. Fire reimbursement from the airport is also below budget. Fund Balance The Administration’s chart below shows the current General Fund Balance figures. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) has confirmed amounts that lapsed to General Fund Balance at the end of Fiscal Year 2021. If all items are approved as proposed by the Administration, then combined General Fund Balance would be 21.29% or $29,721,935 above the 13% minimum target. Impact Fees Update The Administration provided a summary of impact fee tracking, details on refunding amounts and dates and lists of unfinished projects with impact fee funding. The information is current as of December 13, 2021. As a result, the City is on-track with impact fee budgeting to have no refunds during all FY2022. The Administration reports work Page | 9 is nearing completion to update the fire and parks sections of the impact fee plan. The transportation section was updated last year. Eligible projects for police impact fees are being identified. Type Unallocated Cash “Available to Spend”Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring Impact Fees Fire $1,644,113 More than a year away - Parks $11,709,246 More than a year away - Police $471,211 More than a year away - Transportation $6,585,173 More than a year away - Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract Section A: New Items (note: to expedite the processing of this staff report, staff has included the Administration’s descriptions from the transmittal for some of these items) A-1: Suazo Business Center Membership ($25,000 from General Fund Balance) This $25,000 would fund an annual membership for the Suazo Business Center, resulting in an ongoing partnership with an organization that provides technical support for businesses owned by Latinx residents and members of other underrepresented groups. The Center's location on the West Side facilitates access for area residents, and it was able to expand its services last year because of $25,000 that the Council approved in FY2021 Budget Amendment #2. At the time, one-time federal CARES Act funding was available to cover this amount for one year, but this request is for ongoing City general fund support. Policy Questions: Membership Level – The Council may wish to ask the Administration is there are other membership levels available for the City. Evaluate During Upcoming Annual Budget – The Council may wish to clarify with the Administration whether this item could be addressed in the upcoming annual budget rather than in a budget amendment. Would the Council prefer to address this in the annual budget? A-2: Move Grants Manager from ARPA to General Fund ($66,000 from General Fund Balance) In the FY2022 annual budget the Council approved one Grants Manager FTE in the Finance Department using ARPA funding assuming the final guidance from the U.S. Treasury allowed such a use. The Finance Department has determined the position is not a qualified use and requests the Council shift the position to the General Fund. The position will continue to assist with tracking, reporting and compliance of ARPA funding as well as other grants. The City has seen an increase in grant applications to approximately 100 in the last two fiscal years. The City is on track for a similar number of grants in FY2022. The bipartisan infrastructure bill recently passed in Congress and signed by the President increases funding opportunities over the next several years and could also result in more grant applications. A-3: Healthcare Innovation Branding Biohive ($50,000 from General Fund Balance) Council staff asked DED why another $50,000 was needed after the same amount, also identified as one-time, was approved in Budget Amendment #4 of FY2021, and what deliverables would result from this amount of spending. The Department’s response did not address this specific question about the additional funding. The Department has provided general information about the goals of the program (see Attachment 1). Policy Questions: Ongoing or One-time Need – The Council may wish to clarify with the Administration if this is in fact more of an ongoing need, and if so whether it should be addressed in the upcoming annual budget rather than as sequential budget amendment requests. Page | 10 Status of Earlier $50,000 – The Council may wish to ask the Department if funds from FY2021 are fully spent or encumbered, and what data was collected because of the previous expenditure. A-4: Fix the Bricks Program and FTE Transfer from Fire Department to Community and Neighborhoods Department (Budget Neutral) This item would transfer an Office Technician II FTE and an hourly Office Technician from the Emergency Division within the Fire Department to the Housing Stability Division within the CAN Department. No budget impact would be incurred as the positions already exist. Note that both positions are currently vacant. Ongoing administration of the FEMA grant which funds Fix the Bricks and the two positions would also transfer to the CAN Department. The Housing Stability Division administers several other ongoing Federal grants, many from the U.S. HUD Department, and could apply those existing skillsets to this FEMA grant. The Division’s housing rehabilitation employees have also assisted Fix the Bricks operations in the past such as environmental reviews, floodplains, historic preservation, noise abatement and control, etc. There may be benefits of combining Fix the Bricks with the housing rehabilitation programs that offer small and medium sized repairs to qualified low- and moderate-income homeowners. The two Fix the Bricks employees would be supervised by the Housing Project Manager that also oversees the housing rehabilitation program. Demand has exceeded program capacity since launching several years ago. Last year an engineering firm was contracted with for home inspection and repair approvals which is speeding up that step of the process. Contractors must be on the approved list to submit seismic improvement project bids. A training program for contractors is being developed to try and get more added to the approved list. Issues related to supply chains and job vacancies are also reported to be slowing the pace of contractor’s work. The multiple emergencies of the past two years and ongoing pandemic have reduced Emergency Management staff’s ability to work on Fix the Bricks. Policy Questions: Resources to Increase Pace of Seismic Improvements – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what additional resources, staffing and/or program changes could decrease wait times for residents. FEMA’s Use of Funding Timeliness Expectations – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if FEMA has any timeliness requirements or expectations about the use of grant funds awarded to the City. The program recently completed using funding from 2017. Geographic Equity – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration potential changes to improve geographic equity of program participants such as helping low- and moderate-income residents cover the 25% cost share, using a sliding scale based on income, and assistance navigating funding options (historic tax credits, grants, local community organizations, etc.). The Council may also wish to ask if information is available on the current distribution of participants for completed projects and those on the waiting list. A-5: Additional Police Sergeant for Special Victims Unit ($135,971 from General Fund Balance) This request would create a second sergeant for the Special Victims Units (SVU) in the Police Department and provide funding for a vehicle, computer, and other equipment. The current sergeant supervises 12 detectives which is more than best practice and raises span of control issues. The SVU caseload has increased in recent years. A major driver of the growing caseload is sexual assault evidence kit DNA matches in the national database. A DNA match can provide suspect identification and other new information for investigation. In 2014 and 2015 over 700 sexual assault evidence kits from cold cases were submitted to the State Crime Lab for processing. The Police Department reports over 400 DNA matches have been identified which provides new leads to investigate. If the second sergeant is approved, then the SVU would designate a team focused on sex crimes investigations including the new DNA leads from the older sexual assault evidence kits. This is expected to improve case investigations and the Department’s ability to process the cold cases. The Department reports similar workload and span of control issues are being experienced for victim advocates working with the SVU. A grant funded advocate was embedded in the SVU to directly work with detectives investigating cold cases. However, the grant funding ends September 2022. Continuing the position by using Page | 11 General Fund dollars could be a request in the FY2023 annual budget. The Department reports one or two more SVU detectives may also be requested given the high number of DNA matches from sexual assault evidence kits. Policy Question: Resources to Increase Pace of Cold Case Investigations – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what resources in addition to SVU police officers could improve the pace of cold case investigations. For example, are there upstream or downstream resources that could help crime lab evidence processing, victim advocates, the justice court or prosecutor’s office? Evaluate During Upcoming Annual Budget – The Council may wish to ask if this position should be considered in the context of the annual budget, or if the need is more immediate/urgent because of the caseload? A-6: Police Access Control Upgrade and Support ($214,538 from General Fund Balance) This request would replace the original security access control system at the Public Safety Building which was installed nine years ago. The funding includes $113,198 for hardware (controllers, readers, and server), $56,340 for installation and ongoing maintenance and support estimated at $45,000 annually. The new system allows the building to continue meeting Federal and State security compliance rules. The hardware includes a new server that could act as the backbone for a new standard security system across all city facilities. The approach was developed by IMS, Facilities and Engineering. The Police Department would be the first to move to the new system. Additional funding may be needed to transfer other departments and facilities into the new system A-7: Fireworks Budget ($25,000 from General Fund Balance) This request would fund two fireworks shows in July 2022: one at Jordan Park on Independence Day, July 4th, and another at Liberty Park on Pioneer Day, July 24th. Funding and contracts for the two shows are typically needed in the spring to ensure vendor availability. The Administration states the shows could be cancelled based on certain conditions such as an air quality index of 100+ and severe drought. The Council removed funding for the shows in the FY2022 annual budget because of the ongoing drought. At the time some Council Members expressed concern about fireworks in general, that they are always bad for air quality. Some current Council Members have expressed similar concerns. Policy Question: Alternative Celebration Options – The Council may wish to discuss alternative options to celebrate the two July holidays such as festivals, laser & light shows, drone shows, etc. A-8: This item will be held as a future briefing about the City’s efforts to diversify public safety response options A-9: Arts Council Staff Increase of 3 FTEs ($175,000 from General Fund Balance) The Administration indicates that the Arts Council needs additional staff support to handle current workload as well as the duties/role of the Mayor’s Advisor on Arts and Culture which was shifted from the Mayor’s Office to the Arts Council. A total of three (3) FTEs are being requested: two (2) Arts Council Program Coordinators and one (1) Arts Council Program Manager. The Council may wish to note that these same positions were initially proposed in the last annual budget process requesting the use of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) monies to fund the positions, however, these positions did not qualify for ARPA funds, and the Council did not prioritize them for funding with General Fund dollars when balancing the budget before adoption. The Administration is requesting that these positions be funded now using fund balance – six months each for two program coordinators and six months for one program manager. The job descriptions are as follows: Arts Council Program Coordinators (Annual salary and benefits $94,383 – Six months is $47,192) The incumbents would coordinate, organize, and implement Arts Council & Economic Development-related programs and services; implement marketing efforts, collaborate on grant writing and reporting; provide information and technical assistance as needed to artists, arts organizations, and the public; and track income and expenses. Page | 12 Arts Council Program Manager (Annual salary and benefits $121,116 – Six months is $60,558) The incumbent would direct one or more major program and initiative(s) within the City’s Department of Economic Development, including arts and culture programming, small business and entrepreneurship support, and recruitment and retention activities. Activities would include being responsible for the department programs, working with community members, advisory boards, and project management with the end goal to support the City’s arts, economic and equity master plan goals. Policy Questions: Work for the Non-profit and/or the City – The Council may wish to ask whether the new staff members will perform work that relates to the non-profit organization, or whether the work will be directly for Salt Lake City. Evaluate During Upcoming Annual Budget – The Council may wish to discuss if this proposal would be better evaluated during the annual budget with the full context of the City’s competing needs. The FY2022 annual budget tentatively included using ARPA funding for three new Arts Council FTEs, but U.S. Treasury guidance determined those positions were an ineligible use. The Administration shared the following context regarding this policy question: 1. “ZAP Grant Funding: Since 2016, the Arts Council’s award from Salt Lake County Zoo, Arts, and Parks (ZAP) Tier I grant funding has averaged $360,000 annually, based on qualifying programming and operating expenses. This prestigious grant, of which the Arts Council is the only local Arts Agency within among only 22 organizations countywide, is a continuing opportunity to leverage funds outside the City. Due to strategic shifts in programming in 2018, the Arts Council no longer incurs the $1.5 to 2 million dollars cost of in-house expenses to the Twilight Concert Series. A natural consequence of this shift is that the annual ZAP award is calculated based on three years of qualifying expenditures; thus, the organization’s qualifying expenditures have been significantly decreasing with compounding effects. The Arts Council projects over $175,000 in losses by 2022. The additional staffing costs will qualify as expenditures to begin to mitigate and stabilize this award in the next three years (although it will not reach its previous levels due to lower expenditures). So, less expenditures lead to a lesser grant award. It should be noted that the ZAP grant revenue losses will still occur and compound despite new staffing expenditures mitigating the stabilization of this critical funding. In preparation for FY23 the staff and board are currently considering tiered approaches and scenarios to programmatic cuts while mitigating service losses to the arts community during one of the hardest hit industries through the COVID-19 pandemic. 2. Programmatic & Mayoral goal execution and staffing capacity: Since 2013, the Arts Council has been a staff of six full-time City employees (5 in 2011). Since that time significant changes to programming scope, budget, and priorities/values-and a rapidly growing city-have occurred with no increases to full- time support. Over the years, there have been increases to program funds and the grants budget without additional staffing support. Major impacts include our ability to deliver program services namely in Public Art and the new maintenance fund, all public programs such as Living Traditions Presents, City Arts Grants; and new initiatives of the City, and the Mayor’s Plan-all outside the scope of baseline programs and functions of our Local Arts Agency designation. Additionally, in 2020 the full-time policy role of Mayor’s Advisor on Arts & Culture was eliminated from the Mayor’s Office and that role condensed to the Arts Division Executive Director. This has resulted in expanded Citywide and external communications, projects, policy, and consultation (internal and external) asked of the Executive Director as a result, and the incorporation of the management of the Cultural Core project into the Arts Council. For the Arts Council to continue its development efforts (which have shown measurable increases in recent years) to begin to mitigate the ZAP losses, and leverage value to the City, capacity needs to exist to staff the above efforts. [If the Council were to wait to fund the positions during the annual budget process], the above considerations would just be further postponed and continue the strains mentioned. The Arts Council has requested staffing at the Department since FY21 to mitigate these challenges. It has been in the Mayors Plan to “Stabilize the Structure and Funding of the Arts Council” in Plans 2020-2022. While our team is Page | 13 passionate and committed, we have experienced staff retention and morale issues related to high volumes of work. Retaining the incredible talent that we currently have is of the utmost importance for service continuity to the arts community.” A-10: Allen Park CIP Rescope (Budget Neutral to Swap Funding Sources) In FY2021 CIP, the Council approved $450,000 of recaptured bond funds to create an Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan for Allen Park. In FY2022 CIP, the Council approved $420,000 of parks impact fees for historic preservation and renovation work at 11 structures in the park and capital improvements like pedestrian stairway connections and new amenities. The funding includes analysis, cost estimates and construction ready designs. Additional funding requests for construction would come to the Council in future budget openings. This request is to rescope the FY2022 CIP funding of $420,000 to be used on the Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan instead of the pre-construction work for structure renovations and capital improvements. This change accommodates legal limitations that bond funds may not be spent on the plan. The FY2021 CIP funding of $450,000 would be used for the pre-construction work instead of developing the Reuse Plan. The total funding available for Allen Park would not change. The Parks and Public Lands Department provided the below breakdown of how the bond funds have been spent so far. $284,253 of bond funds remain and need to be spent quickly to comply with spending deadlines. The remaining bond funds are anticipated to be fully spent on waterline replacements, water meter replacements and roof upgrades. Construction schedules estimate the work could be completed over the coming summer months. -$75,000 for Assets & Structures Inventory & Documentation/Assessments of Historic Features -$33,993 for Roof Stabilization & Leak Repair, George Allen Home -$31,433 for Construction Documents for Water Line / Water Meter Replacement & Irrigation Upgrade -$11,560 for Installation of Power Boxes for Site Power / Event Infrastructure -$11,505 for Waste and Hazardous Materials Removal from Historic Residences -$2,256 for Engineering fees charged for review of construction documents A-11: Executive Assistant in the Mayor’s Office ($39,792 from General Fund Balance) This item would add one executive assistant FTE to the Mayor’s Office. The requested funding is for five months. The fully loaded annual cost is estimated at $95,501 and would be added to the FY2023 annual budget. A-12: Citywide Equity Study ($90,000 from General Fund Balance) The Council approved $100,000 for this study in Budget Amendment #4 of FY2020. This additional funding adds several tasks to the study scope: -Task 1. Additional project coordination and management for 2022. -Task 2. Documentation and mapping of current community engagement processes at the City, including those spearheaded by the Civic Engagement Team and those led by departments. -Task 3. Review of current City data on how/whether constituents receive information or provide feedback. -Task 4. Review of representation of different constituencies on City advisory boards and other groups. -Task 4. Interviews, virtual workshops, focus groups and other discussions with City staff and community leaders. -Task 5. Review of the literature concerning good practices for public sector communication and engagement with hard-to-reach populations. -Task 6. Case studies of good practices employed by state or local governments. -Task 7. Recommendations for solidifying and strengthening current efforts and creating new avenues for outreach and engagement. -Task 8. Piloting new community engagement strategies. -Task 9. Report and three presentations. A-13: Fuel Cost Increases ($938,076 to Fleet Fund from Several Sources) Fuel inflation in the market has caused costs to exceed the FY2022 Fleet Fund budget for fuel. This item will increase the fuel budget to be enough to reach the end of the fiscal year. The FY2022 budget has $2.6 for fuel Page | 14 purchases which would be increased 36% to $3.5 million. Council staff requested a funding source breakdown for the additional budget. The information was not available at the time of publishing this staff report. A-14: COVID Personal Protective Equipment ($200,000 from General Fund Balance) The City’s supply of masks and other PPE to combat COVID is depleting. This request is for an additional $200,000 to purchase additional supplies to keep citizens, visitors, and employees safe in City owned buildings. The new masks will be medical grade and tests will also be procured. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section B-1: ARPA Authorized HUD HOME Grant Funding for Admin and Planning Funds ($176,660 from HOME-ARPA Grant) HUD has authorized the City to access 5% ($176,659.75) of admin and planning funds of the City's 2021 HUD HOME-ARPA award (total award, $3,533.195). HOME-ARPA funds are designated for housing opportunities for individuals experiencing homelessness. These admin and planning funds will facilitate existing City staff and expenses related to the HUD-required HOME-ARPA Community Assessment. The Community Assessment will identify needs and opportunities to help direct the HOME-ARPA funds. It’s important to note that the total award is one-time additional grant funding from HUD. This is separate from the annual HOME grant funding the City receives. After HUD reviews and approves the Community Assessment, the Council would need to adopt a substantial amendment to the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan for the City to accept and be able to use the funding. Housing Stability staff will provide the Council with a quick overview of this one-time funding, the process and timeline. Policy Question: Community Needs for this Funding – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration what community needs should be prioritized for this funding and any recommendations for stakeholders to be included in developing the Community Assessment. Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section (None) Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Interest Income on Bonding ($64,140 and $80,977 from CIP Fund) The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019A, were issued in October 2019 for the purpose of funding the reconstruction of City streets. The total par amount of the bonds issued were $17,540,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, the unspent bond proceeds have been earning interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect the actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from October 2020 through August 2021. The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020, were issued in September 2020 for the purpose of funding the reconstruction of City streets. The total par amount of the bonds issued were $17,745,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, the unspent bond proceeds have been earning interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect the actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from February 2021 through August 2021. D-2: WITHDRAWN D-3: Reimburse Misc. Grants for Unreimbursed HUD HOPWA Funds ($32,495 from Bank Pool Clearing Account) Finance discovered that $32,494.55 was paid out to a subgrantee in 2017, but never reimbursed from HUD for HOPWA Cost Center 7261611. The HUD reimbursement deadline of three years has passed for these funds. Housing Stability has identified unrestricted funds from 7800404 Bank Pool Clearing to make the City whole. This budget amendment will facilitate the transfer of funds from a 78 Fund Class to a 72 Fund Class. Page | 15 The Bank Pool Clearing account is used for housing related expenses like credit and title reports, mortgage insurance premiums, and loan fees. The Finance Department worked with the Housing Stability Division to change policies, procedures and staff training to avoid the City losing out on missed reimbursements in the future. D-4: Treasury ERAP 1 Reallocated Funds ($3 million from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Treasury has reallocated unspent Emergency Rent Assistance Program (ERAP) 1 funds set-aside for the State of Utah by low-performing cities and made these funds available to apply for by high-performing cities, such as Salt Lake City. These reallocated funds are for direct client assistance only. To administer Salt Lake City’s initial ERAP 1 award, the City contracted with the State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services’ (DWS) online Utah Rent Relief application portal, https://rentrelief.utah.gov/. Coordinating with DWS, Housing Stability staff have determined that Salt Lake City could apply for $3,000,000 in reallocated ERAP 1. These funds will further assist Salt Lake City residents with deposit, rent, utilities, rent arrears, and utility arrears, again utilizing the Utah Rent Relief application portal. Note: This new request is separate from, and does not affect, the City’s other Treasury ERAP 1 ($6,067,033) and ERAP 2 ($4,800,559.40) awards. See attached funding agreement. (Note: 7262150- Treasury ERA Direct Financial Assistance, is the current Cost Center for ERAP 1 Direct Client Assistance) Nearly all of the $6 million from ERAP 1 has been spent with some outstanding invoices pending processing. The deadline to spend ERAP 1 funds is September 30, 2022. The deadline to spend ERAP 2 funds is September 30, 2025. If D-4 and D-5 are approved as requested, then the City’s total funding from ERAP would be $13,867,632. D-5: Treasury ERAP 2 Reallocated Funds ($2,880,366 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) This budget amendment is to recognize the City's second allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act, Treasury Emergency Rent Assistance (ERAP) 2 funds, in the amount of $2,880,335.64, for the purpose of addressing housing stability for Salt Lake City residents. See attached funding agreement. The City approved the first allocation of the ERAP 2 funds in BA1 of FY 21-22, in the amount of $1,920,233.76. The City's total ERAP 2 award is $4,800,599.40. BA1 included the following budget items for those funds: Direct Client Assistance $1,632,199, and Community Partner Admin $288,034.76. To administer Salt Lake City’s first and second allocations of ERAP 2, the City will contract with the State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services’ (DWS) online Utah Rent Relief application portal, https://rentrelief.utah.gov/. The City has previously and successfully contracted with DWS for the City’s ERAP 1 funds. This budget amendment aligns with Treasury guidance on eligible activities and allowable percentage amounts for ERPA 2. In addition to further supporting Direct Client Assistance (deposits, rent, utilities, rent arrears, and utility arrears), and the associated Community Partner Admin to facilitate the proper distribution of these funds, Housing Stability is requesting City Admin to support one (1) FTE, and funds to support Housing Stability services. Re: the one (1) FTE: Currently, the City’s ERAP 1 and 2 funds are being administered by 1 PTE. This position is necessary to facilitate the City administration, coordination, and compliance monitoring. This position was pervious approved by Council with ERAP 1 funding. Since then, the administration of these funds has demonstrated that a FTE is required. This one (1) requested position would be Grade 26, Community Development Grant Specialist, fully loaded for 39 months. (April 2022 - Jun 2025, at $34.50 an hour [$215,280], plus benefits [$53,820]. Total $269,100.) This position would be fully funded by ERAP funding and would sunset when funding expires. Re: Housing Stability services: According to the Treasury, eligible “Housing Stability” services include: Case management, Eviction prevention, Eviction diversion programs, Mediation between landlords and tenants, Housing counseling, Fair housing counseling, Housing navigators or promotors that help households access ERA programs or find housing, Housing-related services for survivors of domestic abuse or human trafficking, Legal services or attorney’s fees related to eviction proceedings and maintaining housing stability, Specialized services for individuals with disabilities or seniors that support their ability to access or maintain housing. A public competitive process would receive applications from providers for eligible Housing Stability services. Staff note: after transmittal updated numbers confirmed the total amount should actually be $41 less than the originally requested budget. This will be adjusted for the Council’s final adoption vote. D-6: Annex Building Renovation – Moving Funds from Misc. Grants to CIP Fund ($500,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) In Budget Amendment #2, the Council added an item totaling $500,000 in grant funding to be used for Annex Building Renovations. This amount was approved within the Miscellaneous Grants Fund. Since the associated annex building renovation should be done through CIP, the budget needs to be moved. Page | 16 D-7: State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan ($7 million from Debt Service Fund) On December 6, 2021, the City and the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) entered into a loan agreement which will be used to finance a portion of a neighborhood parking structure between 400 West and 500 West and 600 South and 700 South. The loan is expected to be repaid with funds allocated to the City by H.B. 244 (2021). The City has received funds for the State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the receipt of loan proceeds and the expenditure budget to disburse the proceeds for the project. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant ($86,750 from CIP Fund) The Dept. of Community & Neighborhood, Division of Engineering applied for and received $86,750 for the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 (round 1) for safety improvements to the railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South. Planned safety improvements include widening the roadway, improving sight distance by raising the street grade approach, adding sidewalk on the south side of the crossing, adding bike lanes, and replacing the railroad crossing signals. The funding plan is to request an additional $260,250 in the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 Round 2 competition to complete the funding package for the project. A Public hearing was held 7/5/21. E-2: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant, Round 2 ($93,750 from CIP Fund) The Dept. of Community & Neighborhood, Division of Engineering applied for and received $93,750 for the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 (round 2) for safety improvements to the railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South. Planned safety improvements include widening the roadway, improving sight distance by raising the street grade approach, adding sidewalk on the south side of the crossing, adding bike lanes, and replacing the railroad crossing signals. This grant has no match requirement. A public hearing was held 12/7/21. E-3: Utah Department of Transportation, 600/700 N Frequent Transit Network Improvement Grant ($228,000 from CIP Fund) The Dept. of Community & Neighborhood, Division of Engineering applied for and received $93,750 for the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 (round 2) for safety improvements to the railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South. Planned safety improvements include widening the roadway, improving sight distance by raising the street grade approach, adding sidewalk on the south side of the crossing, adding bike lanes, and replacing the railroad crossing signals. This grant has no match requirement. A public hearing was held 12/7/21 for the original grant application for this award. E-4: State of Utah, Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail Grant The Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands received $1,300,000 for the Foothills Natural Area & Bonneville Shoreline Trailhead Infrastructure Improvements. The project proposes to construct five public access trailheads along the stretch of the Bonneville Shoreline Trail that runs through the Salt Lake City foothills between Emigration Canyon and Davis County. Proposed trailhead locations are: 1) Bonneville Boulevard near City Creek Canyon and Utah State Capitol, 2) Emigration Canyon near This Is The Place Heritage Park, 3) Popperton Park near the University of Utah, 4) 18th Avenue in the upper Avenues neighborhood, and 5) Victory Road northwest of the Utah State Capitol. This grant has a match requirement of $1,300,000. Parks & Public Lands has committed matching funds is from parks impact fees adopted in FY 2022 Capital Improvement Program for the Foothills Trailhead Development Phase II. The $2.6 million total project funding will fully cover construction costs at all five locations based on current plans and estimates. Note: This funding is not subject to the FY2022 annual budget adoption ordinance contingency on all Foothill trails funding because this project is constructing trailhead infrastructure. Policy Question: Pausing Trail Construction and Building Trailhead Infrastructure – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how this relates to the pause in work relating to the Foothills Trails Plan. Section F: Donations (None) Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 3 G-1: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Distracted Driving Prevention Program Grant ($13,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Police Department applied for and received a $13,000 grant from the Utah Highway Safety Office for the 2022 Page | 17 Distracted Driving Prevention Program. The grant funding is for overtime to conduct distracted driving enforcement/education shifts. A Public Hearing was held on 4/20/21 for the grant application on this award. G-2: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program Grant ($9,690 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Police Department applied for and received a $9,690 grant from the Utah Highway Safety Office for the 2022 Salt Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program. This award is to fund crosswalk enforcement/education overtime and Youth bicycle rodeo overtime. A Public Hearing was held on 4/20/21. G-3: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 De-Escalation Training Solicitation Grant ($92,230 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Police Department applied for and received a $92,320 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services through the FY21 Community Policing Development De-Escalation Training Program. The grant will fund the Apex Officer Interactive Crisis Intervention, De-Escalation and Force Options Virtual Reality Training Simulator. It will also provide funding for up to 20 officers to attend an ICAT (Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics) de-escalation train-the-trainer course as well as training staff overtime/supplies to implement the ICAT and virtual reality curriculums. The Apex Officer Virtual Reality Training System is a comprehensive solution that is designed to allow trainers the ability to give presentations and classes, conduct interactive testing and assessment, and provide immersive, hands-on scenario-based exercises with detailed debriefing and after-action review. ICAT is a training program that provides first responding police officers with the tools, skills, and options they need to successfully and safely defuse a range of critical incidents. The only costs being funded are for per diem. Remaining travel costs will be covered by other funding sources. A Public Hearing was held on 10/5/21. G-4: U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Grant ($59,360 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Police Department applied for and received a $59,360 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services through the FY21 Community Policing Development Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act. The grant will fund training for Employee Wellness and Peer Support Teams, Wellness Initiative, chaplain uniforms, program education and marketing materials, supplies, program evaluation, instructor fees for Family Wellness Workshops, and overtime. A Public Hearing was held on 9/7/21. G-5: US Department of Justice, 2021 Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Grant ($340,246 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Police Department applied for and received a grant award from the U.S. Department of Justice under the 2021 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) program. The total grant award is $340,246. Of that total the City will subaward $57,055 to the Unified Police Department and $57,054 to Salt Lake County (Sheriff's Office). The subaward amounts are determined by a federal funding allocation formula. The Police Department will use its award to provide training for sworn and civilian personnel, to support directed community policing overtime, and to purchase the following: a tactical robot, less lethal shotguns and ammo, tactical operation center throw phone capability enhancements, a laptop for Crime Lab FARO software, vest carriers and plates for Crime Lab personnel, LEAPS (Law Enforcement Automated Personnel Software), and camera systems for the Internal Affairs Unit and the HOP physical training facility. No Match is required. A Public Hearing was held on 10/5/21. G-6: Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) ($10,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for additional grant funding and was awarded $10,000 from the State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), under the State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) program. The State is combining these new funds with the previously funded amount of $1,500. The funds will be used for an overt pole camera kit, Narcan nasal spray, and drug prevention resource cards. A public hearing was held 9/7/21. Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 4 G-1: Utah State Office of Education, Child and Adult Care Food Program - Youth After School Programs Grant ($46,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Youth & Family Division of Public Services applied for and received a continuation grant offered annually by the Utah State Office of Education, under the Child and Adult Care Food Program. These funds are available to Page | 18 youth service providers as part of the At-Risk Snack Program to reimburse the costs of snacks served to children participating in the after-school programs. Central City Rec. Center, Fairmont Park, Glendale Library, Liberty Park, Northwest Rec. Center, Ottinger Hall, the Youth and Family Division Office, and Sorenson Campus will receive reimbursement directly through the State Office of Education and will receive up to $46,000, based on qualified snack expenses. SLC is reimbursed on a monthly basis and only qualified healthy snacks and meals served to children participating in the after-school enrichment/education activities during the afterschool program hours are eligible for reimbursement. A public hearing was held 10/5/21. G-2: Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Grant Program, Marathon Petroleum Foundation Grant ($100,000 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Division of Youth & Family Services applied for and received $100,000 in grant funding for the Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Program. The funding will be used to purchase two 14-passenger vans that will be used by program staff to transport youth participants from neighborhood elementary schools to the YouthCity Northwest Recreation center site for afterschool programming. No match is required. A public hearing was held 1/18/22. G-3: Mental Health First Responders, Utah Department of Human Services Grant ($80,010 from Miscellaneous Grant Fund) The Human Resource Dept. applied for and received $80,010 in grant funding for the Mental Health First Responders grant program from Utah Dept. of Human Services. The funding will be used to increase the capacity of the City's existing EAP (Employee Assistance Program), targeting first responders. The two clinicians currently under contract with ComPsych will increase their hours of availability to provide onsite, in person, telephone, and virtual counselling particularly emergency services for individuals who may be in crisis. The total hours will increase by 815 over the course of the pilot projecting. No match is required. A public hearing was held 1/18/22. Section I: Council Added Items I-1: PLACEHOLDER: Additional Funding for Planning Division Mailings ($90,000 – General Fund Balance) The Planning Division needs additional funding to complete mailings for several projects between now and the end of the fiscal year. The Council Chair has suggested using fund balance to supplement the cost of Planning Division mailings as detailed below. The additional $3,980 would be flexible funding in case the number of land use applications and/or the citywide mailing costs come in higher than expected. -$78,120 for two citywide mailings -$1,600 for land use application mailings -$6,300 for Ballpark Station Area Plan and Downtown Building Height code amendments mailings -$86,020 Total ATTACHMENTS 1. Item A-3: Healthcare Innovation Branding Biohive Response from Department of Economic Development to Council Staff’s Questions 2. Racial Equity in Policing Commission Leadership Letter of Support for Hiring Additional Police Officers 3. Violent Crimes Unit One-pager ACRONYMS ADA – Americans with Disabilities Act ARPA – American Rescue Plan Act CAFR – Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CAN – Community and Neighborhoods Department CCJJ – Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice CIP – Capital Improvement Program COPS – Community Oriented Policing Services COVID – Name for the disease caused by the 2019 Novel Coronavirus DOJ – United States Department of Justice ERAP – Emergency Rental Assistance Program FTE – Full Time Equivalent Position FY – Fiscal Year Page | 19 GF – General Fund HOPWA – Housing Opportunities For People With Aids HUD – United States Housing and Urban Development Department JAG – Justice Assistance Grant PPE – Personal Protective Equipment RDA – Redevelopment Agency REP – Racial Equity in Policing Commission SAFG – Utah State Asset Forfeiture Grant Program SIB – State Infrastructure Bank UDOT – Utah Department of Transportation Attachment 1. Department of Economic Development’s "Response" to Council Staff Questions about Item A-3, Healthcare Innovation Branding Biohive Council Staff Questions: The Council approved $50,000 in Budget Amendment #4 of FY21 for this same use and it was identified as one-time. Could you please discuss why additional funding is needed and what deliverables are expected? Department of Economic Development Response: In 2020, the Mayor convened stakeholders in the life science industry to help shape the City’s economic development approach around health care innovation. The goal of this was to harness the impact and growth of this industry and to connect companies and organizations to workforce development, STEM education, and other programs and policies that will help provide economic opportunity to underserved communities in the City. The partnerships created between Salt Lake City, GoUtah, WTC Utah, BioUtah, EDC Utah, University of Utah, as well as companies representing various sub-sectors of health care innovation are focused on elevating the awareness of this industry with a focus on branding and marketing it through the new entity known as Biohive. This partnership is in alignment to not duplicate efforts, but to harness the collective goals of key organizations and the City to retain and help grow this industry together for the benefit of City residents. This will be accomplished through the following deliverables and activities: i.Marketing and branding of the industry that has the City at the central hub of activity to connect residents to an industry that creates high wage jobs (multiple entry points for careers and jobs), pipeline of new talent through new technologies being created at the University of Utah, and an already strong yet not well-known history of diagnostic and medical device companies. ii.Workforce development programing in partnership with the Salt Lake School District, Salt Lake Community College, and higher education by providing new opportunities for communities who have not participated before in the life science industry. iii.Programming and activities to ensure the momentum of this industry continues to be retention and growth. Page | 20 iv.A report that updates on these fronts within Salt Lake City. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238 PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ___________________________________ Date Received: ________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ___________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 14,2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Budget Amendment #6 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director (801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2021-22 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $ 0.00 $ 2,701,648.00 FLEET FUND 1,482,576.00 1,482,576.00 IMS FUND 259,338.00 259,338.00 MISCELLANEOUS GRANT FUND 6,840,147.00 7,227652.00 HOUSING FUND 1,100,000.00 1,132,495.00 DEBT SERVICE FUND 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 CIP FUND 3,658,298.75 3,658,298.75 TOTAL $ 20,340,359.75 $ 23,462,007.75 Lisa Shaffer (Jan 14, 2022 12:34 MST) BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2021-22 Budget Adjustments The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2022. Projections for fiscal year 2021 were better than expected, while projections for fiscal year 2022 continue to trend above budget. Sales tax for the first quarter was well above budget and the prior year. Franchise tax is lagging below budget from a decrease in water franchise ($250,000) and telephone ($150,000) franchise taxes. Other notable increases are licenses are above budget driven by increases in airport parking taxes and innkeepers tax. Permits remain very strong with increases in plan check fees and building permits. Field reservations, land leases and building leases are leading to an increase in Charges, Fees and Rentals. Notable decreases include a decrease in moving violations and justice court fines and fire reimbursement from the airport is also below budget. FY21-22 Variance Annual Revised Favorable Revenue Budget Forecast (Unfavorable) Property Taxes 112,726,044 112,726,044 - Sales and Use Tax 89,556,472 93,436,473 3,880,001 Franchise Tax 12,102,129 11,700,054 (402,075) PILOT Taxes 1,562,041 1,562,041 - TOTAL TAXES 215,946,686 219,424,612 3,477,926 License and Permits 29,904,360 34,561,893 4,657,533 Intergovernmental 4,644,018 5,166,761 522,743 Interest Income 1,271,153 1,271,153 - Fines & Forfeiture 3,474,455 3,425,328 (49,127) Parking Meter Collection 2,693,555 2,693,555 - Charges and Services 3,934,570 4,252,996 318,426 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,372,272 3,329,733 (42,539) Interfund Reimbursement 22,032,892 21,523,465 (509,427) Transfers 21,079,600 21,079,601 1 TOTAL W/OUT SPECIAL TAX 308,353,561 316,729,097 8,375,536 Sales and Use Tax - 1/2 cent 35,600,001 38,000,000 2,399,999 Sales and Use Tax - County Option - - - TOTAL GENERAL FUND 343,953,562 354,729,097 10,775,535 With the completion of the CAFR fund balance would be projected as follows for FY2021 and FY2022: With the use of fund balance from this budget amendment fund balance is projected to be at 21.29%. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 6,625,050 82,617,126 89,242,176 12,114,190 104,171,780 116,285,970 Budgeted Change in Fund Balance 2,924,682 (7,810,302) (4,885,620) (2,879,483) (15,335,334) (18,214,817) Prior Year Encumbrances (3,733,743) (6,165,453) (9,899,196) (1,879,654) (10,259,789) (12,139,443) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 5,815,989 68,641,371 74,457,360 7,355,053 78,576,657 85,931,710 Beginning Fund Balance Percent 14.51%23.16%22.13%18.22%24.71%23.98% Year End CAFR Adjustments Revenue Changes - - - - - - Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) - (5,676,583) (5,676,583) - (7,535,897) (7,535,897) Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 5,815,989 62,964,788 68,780,777 7,355,053 71,040,760 78,395,813 Final Fund Balance Percent 14.51%21.24%20.44%18.22%22.34%21.88% Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance (1,000,000) (15,858,313) (16,858,313) BA#1 Revenue Adjustment - - - - BA#1 Expense Adjustment - - 5,138,235 5,138,235 BA#2 Revenue Adjustment - - 490,847 490,847 BA#2 Expense Adjustment - - (986,298) (986,298) BA#3 Revenue Adjustment - - - - BA#3 Expense Adjustment - (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (2,000,000) BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - 1,508,044 1,508,044 BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - (4,242,779) (4,242,779) BA#5 Revenue Adjustment - - 400,000 400,000 BA#5 Expense Adjustment - - (400,000) (400,000) BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - - - - BA#6 Expense Adjustment - - (1,997,761) (1,997,761) BA#7 Revenue Adjustment - - - - BA#7 Expense Adjustment - - - - Change in Revenue 7,298,201 10,388,598 17,686,799 - - - Fund Balance Budgeted Increase - - - - - - - - Adjusted Fund Balance 12,114,190 57,495,073 69,609,263 6,355,053 69,951,048 76,306,101 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 30.21%19.40%20.69%15.75%22.00%21.29% Projected Revenue 40,095,707 296,422,894 336,518,601 40,359,137 317,980,599 358,339,736 2021 Projection 2022 Projection The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $20,340,359.75 of revenue and expense of $23,462,007.75. The amendment proposes changes in seven funds, including the addition of 16 new FTEs. The amendment also includes the use of $2,701,648.00 from the General Fund fund balance. The proposal includes 35 initiatives for Council review. A summary spreadsheet document, outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget opening is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ______ of 2022 Sixth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 In June of 2021, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2021. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning 2 July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2022. ________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________ Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed _________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. _________ of 2022. Published: ___________________. Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Senior City Attorney Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 Suazo Membership GF - 25,000.00 - - Ongoing - 2 Move Grants Manager from ARPA to GF Funding GF - 66,000.00 - - Ongoing 1.00 2 Move Grants Manager from ARPA to GF Funding Misc Grants - (80,000.00) - - Ongoing (1.00) 3 Healthcare Innovation - Biohive GF - 50,000.00 - - One-time - 4 Fix the Bricks Grant - Transfer Grant Funded PCN GF - - - - Ongoing - 5 Additional Sergeant for Special Victims Unit GF - 81,671.00 - - Ongoing 1.00 5 Additional Sergeant for Special Victims Unit GF - 54,300.00 - - One-time - 5 Additional Sergeant for Special Victims Unit Fleet 49,500.00 49,500.00 - - One-time - 5 Additional Sergeant for Special Victims Unit IMS 4,800.00 4,800.00 - - One-time - 6 Police Access Control Upgrade and Support GF - 214,538.00 - - One-time - 6 Police Access Control Upgrade and Support IMS 214,538.00 214,538.00 - - One-time - 7 Fireworks Budget GF - 25,000.00 - - One-time - 8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match GF - 364,030.00 - - Ongoing 10.00 8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match GF - 282,430.00 - - Ongoing - 8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match GF - 535,000.00 - - One-time - 8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match Fleet 495,000.00 495,000.00 - - One-time - 8 Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match IMS 40,000.00 40,000.00 - - One-time - 9 Arts Council Staff GF - 175,000.00 - - Ongoing 3.00 10 Allen Part Plan CIP [Project Rescope]CIP - - One-time - 11 Executive Assistant in Mayors Office GF - 39,792.00 Ongoing 1.00 12 Citywide Equity Study GF - 90,000.00 One-time - 13 Fuel Cost Increases GF - 498,887.00 Ongoing - 13 Fuel Cost Increases Fleet 938,076.00 938,076.00 Ongoing - 14 COVID PPE GF - 200,000.00 One-time - Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed Section A: New Items 1 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 ARPA HOME Admin and Planning Funds Misc Grants 176,660.00 176,660.00 - - One-time - 1 Interest Income on Bonding CIP 64,139.78 64,139.78 - - One-time - 1 Interest Income on Bonding CIP 80,976.97 80,976.97 - - One-time - 2 Housing Program Construction Costs Housing 1,100,000.00 1,100,000.00 - - One-time - 3 Reimburse Misc Grants for Unreimbursed HUD HOPWA Funds Misc Grants 32,495.00 - - - One-time - 3 Reimburse Misc Grants for Unreimbursed HUD HOPWA Funds Housing - 32,495.00 - - One-time - 4 Treasury ERAP 1 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 - - One-time - 5 Treasury ERAP 2 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants 2,880,366.00 2,880,366.00 - - One-time 6 Annex Building Renovation - Moving Funds from Misc Grants to CIP Misc Grants - 500,000.00 - - One-time - 6 Annex Building Renovation - Moving Funds from Misc Grants to CIP CIP 500,000.00 500,000.00 - - One-time - 7 State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan Debt Service 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 - - One-time - Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 UDOT Railroad Safety Grant CIP 86,750.00 86,750.00 - - One-time - 2 UDOT Railroad Safety Grant, Round 2 CIP 93,750.00 93,750.00 - - One-time - 3 Utah Dept. of Transportation, 600/700 N FREQUENT TRANSIT NETWORK IMP CIP 228,000.00 228,000.00 - - One-time - 3 Utah Dept. of Transportation, 600/700 N FREQUENT TRANSIT NETWORK IMP CIP (152,000.00) (152,000.00) - - One-time - 3 Utah Dept. of Transportation, 600/700 N FREQUENT TRANSIT NETWORK IMP CIP 152,000.00 152,000.00 - - One-time - 4 State of Utah, Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail CIP 1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 - - One-time - 4 State of Utah, Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail CIP 1,304,682.00 1,304,682.00 - - One-time - - Council Approved Section D: Housekeeping Section F: Donations Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Administration Proposed Council Approved Administration Proposed 2 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Consent Agenda #3 1 State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Distracted Driving Prevention Program Misc Grants 13,000.00 13,000.00 - - One-time - 2 State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program Misc Grants 9,690.00 9,690.00 - - One-time - 3 US Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 De- Escalation Training Solicitation Misc Grants 92,320.00 92,320.00 - - One-time - 4 US Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Misc Grants 59,360.00 59,360.00 - - One-time - 5 US Department of Justice, 2021 Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Misc Grants 340,246.00 340,246.00 - - One-time - 6 Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ) , State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) Misc Grants 10,000.00 10,000.00 - - One-time - 1 Utah State Office of Education, Child and Adult Care Food Program - Youth After School Programs Misc Grants 46,000.00 46,000.00 - - One-time - 2 Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Grant Program, Marathon Petroleum Foundation Misc Grants 100,000.00 100,000.00 - - One-time - 3 Mental Health First Responders, Utah Department of Human Services Misc Grants 80,010.00 80,010.00 - - One-time - Total of Budget Amendment Items 20,340,359.75 23,462,007.75 - - 15.00 Administration Proposed Council Approved Section I: Council Added Items Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards Consent Agenda #4 3 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund Class, Budget Amendment #6: General Fund GF - 2,701,648.00 - - 16.00 Fleet Fund Fleet 1,482,576.00 1,482,576.00 - - - IMS Fund IMS 259,338.00 259,338.00 - - - Miscellaneous Grants Fund Misc Grants 6,840,147.00 7,227,652.00 - - (1.00) Housing Fund Housing 1,100,000.00 1,132,495.00 - - - Debt Service Fund Debt Service 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 - - - CIP Fund CIP 3,658,298.75 3,658,298.75 - - - - - - Total of Budget Amendment Items 20,340,359.75 23,462,007.75 - - 15.00 Administration Proposed Council Approved 4 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2021-22 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2021-22 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total ^^ Total Through BA#5 ^^ General Fund (FC 10)367,582,070 (5,138,235.00) 986,298.00 2,000,000.00 4,242,779.00 400,000.00 370,072,912.00 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)2,033,573 2,033,573.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,550,000 1,550,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,699,663 7,098.00 5,706,761.00 Water Fund (FC 51)127,365,555 460,716.00 18,118.00 127,844,389.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)268,213,796 221,826.00 7,941.00 268,443,563.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)19,201,013 19,705.00 2,278.00 19,222,996.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)706,792,500 1,350,949.00 39,790.00 708,183,239.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)24,713,505 36,538.00 4,109.00 24,754,152.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)9,697,417 19,649.00 88,749.00 1,802,257.00 11,608,072.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)4,056,856 4,056,856.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)28,090,576 18,999.00 112,646.00 423,258.00 28,645,479.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)24,302,487 219,193.00 135,492.00 24,657,172.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69) 5,307,142 5,307,142.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,341,332 5,341,332.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)18,684,617 10,427,551.76 1,522,743.00 11,151,215.48 3,447,000.00 45,233,127.24 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)273,797 273,797.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)2,752,565 2,752,565.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)16,121,000 16,121,000.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)31,850,423 26,165,000.00 58,015,423.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)29,503,216 (150,753.00) 23,400,000.00 52,752,463.00 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)2,933,913 24,843.00 2,958,756.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)52,939,489 19,705.00 212,897.00 53,172,091.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,755,009,505 7,688,537.76 2,559,683.00 2,000,000.00 67,605,134.48 3,847,000.00 1,838,709,860.24 5 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 ^^ Total Through BA#5 ^^ BA #6 Total ^^ Total Through BA#6^^ General Fund (FC 10)370,072,912.00 2,701,648.00 372,774,560.00 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000.00 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)2,033,573.00 2,033,573.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,550,000.00 1,550,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,706,761.00 5,706,761.00 Water Fund (FC 51)127,844,389.00 127,844,389.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)268,443,563.00 268,443,563.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)19,222,996.00 19,222,996.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)708,183,239.00 708,183,239.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)24,754,152.00 24,754,152.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)11,608,072.00 11,608,072.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)4,056,856.00 4,056,856.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)28,645,479.00 1,482,576.00 30,128,055.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)24,657,172.00 259,338.00 24,916,510.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for 5,307,142.00 5,307,142.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,341,332.00 5,341,332.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)45,233,127.24 7,227,652.00 52,460,779.24 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)273,797.00 273,797.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)2,752,565.00 2,752,565.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)16,121,000.00 1,132,495.00 17,253,495.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)58,015,423.00 7,000,000.00 65,015,423.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)52,752,463.00 3,658,298.75 56,410,761.75 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)2,958,756.00 2,958,756.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)53,172,091.00 53,172,091.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,838,709,860.24 23,462,007.75 - - - - 1,862,171,867.99 BA#4 and BA#5 remain open with the City Council. Budget Manager Analyst, City Council Contingent Appropriation 6 Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 1 Section A: New Items A-1: Suazo Membership GF $25,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar For Questions Please Include: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar, Randy Hillier This funding would continue to allow Salt Lake City to be represented on the Suazo Board. According to the organization’s website, “The Suazo Business Center is a business Resource committed to the development and empowerment of the Latino/Hispanic and other underserved communities. We provide assistance to help existing and potential minority entrepreneurs succeed and build wealth.” The Administration stated Economic Development would identify a staff person to serve on the Board. A-2: Move Grants Manager from ARPA to GF Funding GF $66,000.00 Misc Grants -$80,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson For Questions Please Include: Mary Beth Thompson , John Vuyk The position associated with this move will be managing all grants, including ARPA. Since ARPA funds need to be specifically dedicated, this position doesn’t qualify for ARPA funding and will need to be moved to and funded by the General Fund. A-3: Healthcare Innovation - Biohive GF $50,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar For Questions Please Include: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar, Randy Hillier Salt Lake City has focused a substantial amount of economic recovery efforts on the healthcare innovation industry as a part of the Tech Lake City initiative. This industry has a strong presence in the City and has high growth potential. This industry is particularly strategic for the City as these jobs are anchor ed with research and development and have high potential for upward mobility. This funding will go towards a collaborative effort alongside industry partners to brand the industry, highlight opportunities within it for underserved communities, and elevate apprenticeships, internships, and upward career mobility. A-4: Fix the Bricks Grant – Transfer Grant Funded PCN GF $0.00 Department: Fire Prepared By: Clint Rasmussen For Questions Please Include: Clint Rasmussen, Randy Hillier Emergency Management recently integrated into the Fire Department. Its existing programs have improved, and new projects are in the works. Emergency Management has several federal grants that it manages including "Fix the Bricks". Part of this specific grant funds the salary/benefits of one FTE to help administer the program. It was determined that the 'Fix the Bricks' grant would be more appropriately administered in the Department of Community and Neighborhood's Housing Stability. This budget amendment would amend the staffing document to reflect the move of 1 PCN/FTE from Fire to Community and Neighborhoods. As the FTE is funded through the grant, no transfer of budget needs to occur. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 2 A-5: Additional Sergeant for Special Victims Unit GF $81,671.00 GF $54,300.00 Fleet $49,500.00 IMS $4,800.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith For Questions Please Include: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith, Sandee Moore Currently, the SVU Sergeant is supervising 12 detectives which is not manageable. SVU caseloads have continued to increase and additional detectives have been assigned to the squad over the past few years in an effort to manage the caseload. Also, over 700 Sexual Assault Kit Initiative (SAKI) kits were submitted a few years ago and the state lab has been making good progress, now returning Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) hits at an increasingly rapid rate. Due to the response of the State lab, we currently have over 400 CODIS hits from the SAKI kits producing cold case leads. These cases need follow up and investigation in a timely manner which we cannot facilitate without additional resources. The benefit of an additional Sergeant, outside rectifying the immense span of control currently handled by a single Sergeant, is the ability to focus efforts on the SAKI and cold case queue. Separating the functions of the squad, overseen by a second Sergeant, to investigate sex crimes committed against adults and children from cold cases, SAK cases, and lesser, but still serious sex crimes (voyeurism, sexual battery, gross lewdness, etc.) would reduce individual caseloads and allow for better case investigation of these crimes as well as increase our ability to make progress on the SAKI cases with CODIS hits. This request for an additional Sgt includes funding for fleet and IMS. This request facilitates an immediate need and future budget requests may be considered for two additional SAKI cold case detectives, overtime, or other resources to facilitate investigation of these cases in a timely manner. A-6: Police Access Control Upgrade and Support GF $214,538.00 IMS $214,538.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich, Captain Teerlink For Questions Please Include: Shellie Dietrich, Captain Teerlink, Sandee Moore, Aaron Bentley Budget request for an update of the security access control system at PSB and ancillary PD facilities. The current system needs to be replaced to prevent a critical failure of building security required for state compliance. PD has worked with facilities to identify a state contracted vendor that will provide the hardware, software and support for access control. The server that is specified in this system has capacity to add other city access control systems as the city system expands. Ongoing cost for support is $45,000 per year and is included in the initial cost for the first yea r. The Police Department has coordinated on this request with Facilities IMS and public works to ensure functionality for all departments as the system is expanded throughout the city. This request is for the first phase of the implementation that covers the police department system. A-7: Fireworks Budget GF $25,000.00 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Gregg Evans For Questions Please Include: Gregg Evans, Kristin Riker, John Vuyk The Public Lands Department Community Events group is requesting $25,000 from General Funds to cover the annual July firework shows that would occur during calendar year 2022. Due to the severe drought, we experienced this past summer the City Council cut the firework funding "one -time" from the FY22 budget. Due to the firework show contract requirements the FY22 show was already prepaid in March of FY21 to reserve the fireworks show in July of FY22. Cutting the funding in FY22 actually impacts the FY23 firework shows. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 3 This budget amendment request would reinstate those funds and provide spending authority to purchase the firework display in advance for the following fiscal year. A-8: Violent Crimes Cops Hiring Grant City Match GF $364,030.00 GF $282,430.00 GF $535,000.00 Fleet $495,000.00 IMS $40,000.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith For Questions Please Include: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith, Sandee Moore The COPS Hiring Grant was funded by DOJ in 2019 and accepted by the City and approved by City Council. A condition o f the grant is that the 3-year project must be completed within a 5-year project period as extensions allow. This will require hiring in January or February of 2022 to facilitate the 3-year project period within the 5 years allowed. The requested budget would be the city portion of the hiring costs for FY 22. Funding would also be required in FY 23 and FY 24 . In FY 25, 6 months of funding would be the city portion and then the city would take on full budget for these 10 positions. The total grant funding is $1,250,000 which will equate to approximately 25% of the cost over 3 years. The 10 officer positions were identified to create a squad dedicated to addressing Violent Crime in the community. These positions, in conjunction with the cooperative Project Safe Neighborhoods program, will have a major impact on the ability to proactively work to reduce violent crime in the city by enforcement and prosecution. A-9: Arts Council Staff GF $175,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jolynn Walz, Ben Kolendar For Questions Please Include: Ben Kolendar, Lorena Riffo Jensen, Jolynn Walz, Randy Hillier The Arts Council is in need of additional staffing support to accommodate duties shifted from the Mayor’s Advisor on Arts & Culture role. In addition, challenges remain to keep up with current workload, fundraising needs due to ZAP loss of qualifying expenditures, and new initiatives requested of the Arts Council. Attrition has been a challenge at the Arts Council due to workload. The request is for 3.0 FTEs which is approximately $350,000 in ongoing expenses and approximately $175,000 in FY22 if funded mid-year. The Arts Council currently has 6.5 FTE to run the full operations of a non-profit, the City’s growing public art program (including maintenance), the city’s arts grants program, programming such as Living Traditions and the Twilight Concert Series and serve as an ombudsman to the arts community. A-10: Allen Park Plan CIP Project Rescope CIP $0.00 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Gregg Evans For Questions Please Include: Kristin Riker, Lewis Kogan, Katherine Maus, Gregg Evans Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment to revise the scope of submitted CIP application for FY 2021 -2022. The original scope for Historic Structure Renovation and Activation at Allen Park included funding for structural and occupancy analysis of historic structures; drawings, plans and cost estimates for reconstruction of the George Allen Home, the "Rooster House," septic system removal, sewer line construction, water infrastructure, stabilization of exterior art pieces, and pedestrian stairway connections; and reconstruction of lighting and driveways. The current scope also lists reconstruction of the George Allen Home and "Rooster House" to serve as a small cafe with dining opportunities. Due to initial public engagement and feedback, Public Lands is requesting a scope change to engage in robust community and stakeholder engagement to create an Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan for Allen Park which will determine the future use of the structures. In order to preserve the strong community investment in the site, Public Lands believes it would be necessary to engage in extensive public engagement to inform a plan that will guide future management decisions and capital improvement projects in the Park. Public Lands is currently engaging with a consultant to complete a Cultural Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 4 Landscape Report, which will also influence the Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan and be completed in a timely manner, in conjunction with public engagement for the plan. Funding for an Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan for Allen Park was awarded in 2020 with reallocated emergency bond funding. However, it was ultimately discovered that it was not legally permit ted for bond funding to be utilized for a non- capital expense. Public Lands is currently utilizing the emergency bond funding for emergency repairs to minimize damage to the structures and the property, including but not limited to roof repair, restoring e xternal power to select structures, investigation and construction documentation for sewer and water line installation, failing appliance removal, septic infrastructure removal, etc. Project tasks within the new scope may include but are not limited to: - Robust community engagement with key stakeholders, the Sugarhouse community, and the broader public - Development of an Adaptive Reuse and Activation Plan, informed by the Cultural Landscape Report and public engagement, to guide future management of the site including over-arching goals, specific projects, objectives and prioritization - Structural and occupancy analysis of the historic structures - Development of conceptual and construction documents, and cost estimates for adaptive reuse and activation projects listed in the Plan - Investigation into the feasibility of Allen Park becoming a Historic Landmark Site A-11: Executive Assistant in the Mayor’s Office GF $39,792.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Dawn Valente, John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk The budget proposes to increase staffing in the Mayor’s Office by one additional executive assistant. The budget is for five month’s salary and costs for computers and other supplies. A-12: Citywide Equity Study GF $90,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Kaletta Lynch, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk The City has been working with Keen Independent Research to review equity practices in the City. The Administration is seeking funding to continue to work with Keen in developing plans to bring equity to Salt Lake City. Funding will allow the City to work with the vendor through this fiscal year to complete the plans. A-13: Fuel Cost Increases GF $498,887.00 Fleet $938,076.00 Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dawn Valente, John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Lorna Vogt, Dawn Valente, Nancy Bean, Denise Sorensen, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk The City has seen an increase in fuel cost. The budget will provide Fleet funding to purchase the required fuel for the remainder of the fiscal year. The budget also proposes to transfer funding from personnel within the Police [$300,000] and CAN [$12,622] Department to cover fuel increases. The budget also proposes additional funding from Non- Departmental to cover the costs not covered by general fund department budgets. The fuel increase has also impacted the Public Utilities, Sustainability, and Golf funds. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 5 A-14: COVID PPE GF $200,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk For Questions Please Include: Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk, Lorna Vogt The City’s supply of masks and other PPE to combat COVID is depleting. This request is for an additional $200,000 to purchase additional supplies to keep citizens, visitors and employees safe in City owned buildings. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources B-1: ARPA HOME Admin and Planning Funds Misc Grants $176,660.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Melyn Osmond HUD has authorized the City to access 5% ($176,659.75) of admin and planning funds of the City's 2021 HUD HOME - ARPA award (total award, $3,533.195). HOME-ARPA funds are designated for housing opportunities for individuals experiencing homelessness. These admin and planning funds will facilitate admin for existing City staff and expenses related to the HUD-required HOME-ARPA Community Assessment. The Community Assessment will identify needs and opportunities to help direct the HOME-ARPA funds. Please see attached funding agreement. Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Interest Income on Bonding CIP $64,139.78 CIP $80,976.97 Department: Finance Prepared By: Jared Jenkins For Questions Please Include: Jared Jenkins, Brandon Bagley, Marina Scott, Mary Beth Thompson The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019A, were issued in October 2019 for the purpose of funding the reconstruction of City streets. The total par amount of the bonds issued were $17,540,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, the unspent bond proceeds have been earning interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect the actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from October 2020 through August 2021. The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020, were issued in September 2020 for the purpose of funding the reconstruction of City streets. The total par amount of the bonds issued were $17,745,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, the unspent bond proceeds have been earning interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect the actual proceeds available including accumulat ed interest from February 2021 through August 2021. D-2: Housing Program Construction Costs Housing $1,100,000.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Suzanne Swanson Recognize $1,100,000 in unbudgeted revenue for the purpose of offsetting increases in constructions costs for three affordable single-family homes currently in development. This revenue was not included in the initial budget due to the timing of other home sales in the Housing Program that generated the revenue. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 6 D-3: Reimburse Misc Grants for Unreimbursed HUD HOPWA Funds Misc Grants $0.00 Housing $32,495.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Suzanne Swanson Finance discovered that $32,494.55 was paid out to a subgrantee in 2017, but never reimbursed from HUD for HOPWA Cost Center 7261611. The HUD reimbursement deadline of three years has passed for these funds. Housing Stability has identified unrestricted funds from 7800404 Bank Pool Clearing to make the City whole. This budget amendment will facilitate the transfer of funds from a 78 Fund Class to a 72 Fund Class. D-4: Treasury ERAP 1 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants $3,000,000.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Suzanne Swanson The Treasury has reallocated unspent Emergency Rent Assistance Program (ERAP) 1 funds set -aside for the State of Utah by low-performing cities and made these funds available to apply for by high-performing cities, such as Salt Lake City. These reallocated funds are for direct client assistance only. To administer Salt Lake City’s initial ERAP 1 award, the City contracted with the State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services’ (DWS) online Utah Rent Relief application portal, https://rentrelief.utah.gov/. Coordinating with DWS, Housing Stability staff have determined that Salt Lake City could apply for $3,000,000 in reallocated ERAP 1. These funds will further assist Salt Lake City residents with deposit, rent, utilities, rent arrears, and utility arrears, again utilizing the Utah Rent Relief application portal. Note: This new request is separate from, and does not affect, the City’s other Treasury ERAP 1 ($6,067,033) and ERAP 2 ($4,800,559.40) awards. See attached funding agreement. (Note: 7262150-Treasury ERA Direct Financial Assistance, is the current Cost Center for ERAP 1 Direct Client Assistance) D-5: Treasury ERAP 2 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants $2,880,366.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For Questions Please Include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Randy Hillier, Suzanne Swanson This budget amendment is to recognize the City's second allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act, Treasury Emergency Rent Assistance (ERAP) 2 funds, in the amount of $2,880,335.64, for the purpose of addressing housing stability for Salt Lake City residents. See attached funding agreement. The City approved the first allocatio n of the ERAP 2 funds in BA1 of FY 21-22, in the amount of $1,920,233.76. The City's total ERAP 2 award is $4,800,599.40. BA1 included the following budget items for those funds: Direct Client Assistance $1,632,199, and Community Partner Admin $288,034.76. To administer Salt Lake City’s first and second allocations of ERAP 2, the City will contract with the State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services’ (DWS) online Utah Rent Relief application portal, https://rentrelief.utah.gov/. The City has previously and successfully contracted with DWS for the City’s ERAP 1 funds. This budget amendment aligns with Treasury guidance on eligible activities and allowable percentage amounts for ERPA 2. In addition to further supporting Direct Client Assistance (deposits, rent, utilities, rent arrears, and utility arrears), an d the Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 7 associated Community Partner Admin to facilitate the prop er distribution of these funds, Housing Stability is requesting City Admin to support one (1) FTE, and funds to support Housing Stability services. Re: the one (1) FTE: Currently, the City’s ERAP 1 and 2 funds are being administered by 1 PTE. This positio n is necessary to facilitate the City administration, coordination, and compliance monitoring. This position was pervious approved by Council with ERAP 1 funding. Since then, the administration of these funds has demonstrated that a FTE is required. This one (1) requested position would be Grade 26, Community Development Grant Specialist, fully loaded for 39 months. (April 2022 - Jun 2025, at $34.50 an hour [$215,280], plus benefits [$53,820].Total $269,100.) This position would be fully funded by ERAP funding and would sunset when funding expires. Re: Housing Stability services: According to the Treasury, eligible “Housing Stability” services include: Case management, Eviction prevention, Eviction diversion programs, Mediation between landlords and tenants , Housing counseling, Fair housing counseling, Housing navigators or promotors that help households access ERA programs or find housing, Housing-related services for survivors of domestic abuse or human trafficking, Legal services or attorney’s fees related to eviction proceedings and maintaining housing stability, Specialized services for individuals with disabilities or seniors tha t support their ability to access or maintain housing. A public competitive process would receive applications from providers for eligible Housing Stability services. D-6: Annex Building Renovation – Moving Funds from Misc Grants to CIP Misc Grants $500,000.00 CIP $500,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Randy Hillier For Questions Please Include: Teresa Beckstrand, John Vuyk, Randy Hillier In Budget Amendment #2, the Council added an item totaling $500,000 in grant funding to be used for Annex Building Renovations. This amount was approved within the Miscellaneous Grants Fund. Since the associated annex building renovation should be done through CIP, the budget needs to be moved. D-7: State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan Debt Service $7,000,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Brandon Bagley For Questions Please Include: Marina Scott, Brandon Bagley, Jared Jenkins, Mary Beth Thompson On December 6, 2021, the City and the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) entered into a loan agreement which will be used to finance a portion of a neighborhood parking structure between 400 West and 500 West and 600 South and 700 South. The loan is expected to be repaid with funds allocated to the City by H.B. 244 (2021). The City has received funds for the State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loan. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the receipt of loan proceeds and the expenditure budget to disburse the proceeds for the project. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant CIP $86,750.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Mary Beth Thompson, Jon Larsen, Orion Goff The Dept. of Community & Neighborhood, Division of Engineering applied for and received $86,750 for the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 (round 1) for safety improvements to the railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South. Planned safety improvements include widening the roadway, improving sight distance by raising the street grade approach, adding sidewalk on the south side of the crossing, adding bike lanes, and replacing the railroad crossing signals . The funding plan is to request an additional $260,250 in the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 Round 2 competition to complete the funding package for the project. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 8 This grant has no match requirement. A public hearing was held 4/6/21 for the original grant application for this award. E-2: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant, Round 2 CIP $93,750.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Mary Beth Thompson, Jon Larsen, Orion Goff The Dept. of Community & Neighborhood, Division of Engineering applied for and received $93,750 for the Utah Railroad Safety Grant 2021 (round 2) for safety improvements to the railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South. Planned safety improvements include widening the roadway, improving sight distance by raising the street grade approach, adding sidewalk on the south side of the crossing, adding bike lanes, and replacing the railroad crossing signals. This grant has no match requirement. A public hearing was held 12/7/21 for the original grant application for this award. E-3: Utah Department of Transportation, 600/700 N Frequent Transit Network Improvement CIP $228,000.00 CIP -$152,000.00 CIP $152,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Mary Beth Thompson, Jon Larsen, Orion Goff Salt Lake City Division of Transportation nominated 600/700 North Frequent Transit Network Improvements (Near Term) for $228,000 from the TTIF: Transit Projects funding. The project installs approximately 20 new Level III transit shelters along 600/700 North from 2200 West to 300 West. This grant has a match requirement of $152,000 coming from the Funding Our Futures sales tax transit funding. A public hearing was held 4/7/20 for the original grant application for this award. E-4: State of Utah, Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail CIP $1,300,000.00 Impact Fee $1,304,682.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond For Questions Please Include: Melyn Osmond, Mary Beth Thompson, Kristin Riker The Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands received $1,300,000 for the Foothills Natural Area & Bonneville Shoreline Trailhead Infrastructure Improvements. The project proposes to construct five public access trailheads along the stretch of the Bonneville Shoreline Trail that runs through the Salt Lake City foothills between Emigration Canyon and Davis County. Proposed trailhead locations are: 1) Bonneville Boulevard near City Creek Canyon and U tah State Capitol, 2) Emigration Canyon near This Is The Place Heritage Park, 3) Popperton Park near the University of Utah, 4) 18th Avenue in the upper Avenues neighborhood, and 5) Victory Road northwest of the Utah State Capitol. This grant has a match requirement of $1,300,000. Parks & Public Lands has committed matching funds is from parks impact fees adopted in FY 2022 Capital Improvement Program for the Foothills Trailhead Development Phase II. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 9 A public hearing was held on 12/7/21 on the grant appl ication for this award. Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda #3 G-1: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Distracted Driving Prevention Program Misc. Grants $13,000.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond The Police Department applied for and received a $13,000 grant from the Utah Highway Safety Office for the 2022 Distracted Driving Prevention Program. The grant funding for overtime to conduct distracted driving enforcement/education shifts. A Public Hearing was held on 4/20/21 for the grant application on this award. G-2: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program Misc. Grants $9,690.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith/ Melyn Osmond The Police Department applied for and received a $9,690 grant from the Utah Highway Safety Office for the 2022 Salt Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program. This award is to fund Crosswalk enforcement/education overtime and Youth bicycle rodeo overtime. A Public Hearing was held on 4/20/21 for the grant application on this award. G-3: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 De-Escalation Training Solicitation Misc. Grants $92,320.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond The Police Department applied for and received a $92,320 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services through the FY21 Community Policing Development De-Escalation Training Program. The grant will fund the Apex Officer Interactive Crisis Intervention, De-Escalation and Force Options Virtual Reality Training Simulator. It will also provide funding for up to 20 officers to attend an ICAT (Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics) de-escalation train-the-trainer course as well as training staff overtime/supplies to implement the ICAT and virtual reality curriculums. The Apex Officer Virtual Reality Training System is a comprehensive solution that is designed to allow trainers the ability to give presentations and classes, conduct interactive testing and assessment, and provide immersive, hands -on scenario- based exercises with detailed debriefing and after-action review. ICAT is a training program that provides first responding police officers with the tools, skills, and options they need to successfully and safely defuse a range of critical incidents. The only costs b eing funded are for per diem, remaining travel costs will be covered by other funding sources. A Public Hearing was held on 10/5/21 for the grant application on this award. G-4: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY21 Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Misc. Grants $59,360.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith/ Melyn Osmond The Police Department applied for and received a $59,360 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services through the FY21 Community Policing Development Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act. The grant will fund: Training for Employee Wellness and Peer Support Teams, Wellness Initiative and Chaplain Program Uniforms, Program Education and Marketing Materials, Class Supplies, Program Evaluation, Instructor Fees for Family Wellness Workshops, and Overtime. Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 10 A Public Hearing was held on 9/7/21 for the grant application on this award. G-5: US Department of Justice, 2021 Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Misc. Grants $340,246.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond The Police Department applied for and received a grant award from the U.S. Department of Justice under the 2021 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) program. The total grant award is $340,246. Of that total the City will subaward $57,054.50 to the Unified Police Department and $57,054.50 to Salt Lake County (Sheriff's Office). The subaward amounts are determined by a federal funding allocation formula. The Police Department will use its award to provide training for sworn and civilian personnel, to support directed community policing overtime, and to purchase the following: a tactical robot, less lethal shotguns and ammo, tactical operation center throw phone capability enhancements, a laptop for Crime Lab FARO software, vest carriers and plates for Crime Lab personnel, LEAPS (Law Enforcement Automated Personnel Software), and camera systems for the Internal Affairs Unit and the HOP physical training facility. No Match is required. A Public Hearing was held on 10/5/21 for the grant application on this award. G-6: Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) Misc. Grants $10,000.00 Department: Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for additional grant funding and was awarded $10,000 from the State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), under the State Asset Forfeiture Grant (SAFG) program. The State is combining these new funds with the previously funded amount of $1,500. The funds will be used for an overt pole camera kit, Narcan nasal spray, and drug prevention/resource cards A public hearing was held 9/7/21 for this grant application. Consent Agenda #4 G-1: Utah State Office of Education, Child and Adult Care Food Program - Youth After School Programs Misc Grants $46,000.00 Department: CAN (Youth & Family) Prepared By: Kim Thomas / Melyn Osmond The Youth & Family Division of Public Services applied for and received a continuation grant offered annually by the Utah State Office of Education, under the Child and Adult Care Food Program. These funds are available to youth service providers as part of the At-Risk Snack Program to reimburse for the costs of snacks served to children participating in the after-school programs. Central City Rec. Center, Fairmont Park, Glendale Library, Liberty Park, Northwest Rec. Center, Ottinger Hall, the Youth and Family Division Office, and Sorenson Campus will receive reimbursement directly through the State Office of Education and will receive up to $46,000, based on qualified snack expenses. SLC is reimbursed on a monthly basis and only qualified healthy snacks and meals served to children participating in the after-school enrichment/education activities during the afterschool program hours are eligible for reimbursement. A public hearing will be held for the grant application. G-2: Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Grant Program, Marathon Petroleum Foundation Misc Grants $100,000.00 Department: CAN (Youth & Family) Prepared By: Ken Perko / Melyn Osmond The Division of Youth & Family Services applied for and received $100,000 in grant funding for the Marathon Petroleum Thriving Communities Program. The funding will be used to purchase two 14 -passenger vans that will be used by program staff to transport youth participants from a variety of neighborhood elementary schools to the YouthCity Northwest Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 11 Recreation center site for afterschool programming. No match is required. A public hearing will be held for this grant application. G-3: Mental Health First Responders, Utah Department of Human Services Misc Grants $80,010.00 Department: Human Resources Prepared By: Trent Steele / Melyn Osmond The Human Resource Dept. applied for and received $80,010 in grant funding for the Mental Health First Responders grant program from Utah Dept. of Human Services. The funding will be used to increase the capacity of the City's existing EAP (Employee Assistance Program), targeting first responders. The two clinicians currently under contract with ComPsych will increase their hours of availability to provide onsite, in person, telephone, and virtual counselling particularly emergency services for individuals who may be in crisis. The total hours will increase by 815 over the course of the pilot projecting. No match is required. A public hearing will be held for this grant application. Section I: Council Added Items Impact Fees ‐ Summary Confidential Data pulled 12/13/2021 Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area Area Cost Center UnAllocated Cash Notes: Impact fee - Police 8484001 471,211$ A Impact fee - Fire 8484002 1,644,113$ B Impact fee - Parks 8484003 11,709,246$ C Impact fee - Streets 8484005 6,585,173$ D 20,409,744$ Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month 202107 (Jul2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202108 (Aug2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202109 (Sep2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202110 (Oct2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Current Month 202111 (Nov2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202112 (Dec2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202201 (Jan2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202202 (Feb2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202203 (Mar2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202204 (Apr2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202205 (May2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202206 (Jun2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202207 (Jul2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202208 (Aug2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202209 (Sep2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202210 (Oct2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202211 (Nov2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202212 (Dec2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202301 (Jan2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202302 (Feb2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202303 (Mar2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202304 (Apr2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202305 (May2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202306 (Jun2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202307 (Jul2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202308 (Aug2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202309 (Sep2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202310 (Oct2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202311 (Nov2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202312 (Dec2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202401 (Jan2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202402 (Feb2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202403 (Mar2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202404 (Apr2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202405 (May2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202406 (Jun2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total, Currently Expiring through June 2021 0$ -$ -$ -$ 0$ Fiscal Quarter E = A + B + C + D Police Fire Parks Streets Total FY 2023Calendar Month FY 2022FY 2024 Impact Fees Confidential Data pulled 12/13/2021 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Police Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Police Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Police Allocation YTD Sum of Police Allocation Remaining Appropriation ReimbExcessPoliceCapacity IF 8422800 1,898,497$ -$ 1,898,497$ -$ Police'sConsultant'sContract 8419205 3,565$ -$ 3,565$ -$ Sugarhouse Police Precinct 8417016 10,331$ 10,331$ -$ -$ PolicePrecinctLandAquisition 8419011 239,836$ 239,836$ -$ -$ Eastside Precint 8419201 21,639$ 21,639$ -$ -$ A Public Safety Building Replcmn 8405005 14,068$ 14,068$ -$ 0$ Police Refunds 8418013 -$ -$ (3,588)$ 3,588.33$ Police Impact Fee Refunds 8421102 338,448$ -$ 68,100$ 270,348$ Grand Total 2,526,385$ 285,875$ 1,966,574$ 273,937$ Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Fire Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Fire Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Fire Allocation YTD E Sum of Fire Allocation Remaining Appropriation Fire refunds 8416007 82,831$ -$ -$ 82,830.52$ Fire Station #14 8415001 6,083$ 6,083$ -$ -$ Fire Station #14 8416006 44,612$ -$ -$ 44,612$ Fire Station #3 8415002 1,568$ -$ -$ 1,568.09$ Fire Station #3 8416009 565$ 96$ -$ 469$ Study for Fire House #3 8413001 15,700$ -$ -$ 15,700$ Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 4,941$ 3,021$ 1,862$ 58$ FY20 FireTrainingFac. 8420431 56,031$ -$ -$ 56,031$ B Grand Total 212,331$ 9,200$ 1,862$ 201,268$ Parks Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Parks Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Parks Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Parks Allocation YTD Sum of Parks Allocation Remaining Appropriation Cnty #2 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420426 88$ -$ 88$ -$ Parks and Public Lands Compreh 8417008 7,500$ -$ 7,500$ -$ Fairmont Park Lighting Impr 8418004 49,752$ 12,155$ 37,597$ -$ Fisher Carriage House 8420130 1,098,764$ 1,038,968$ 59,796$ -$ FY Warm Springs Off Leash 8420132 20,411$ -$ 20,411$ -$ Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 4,857$ 2,596$ 2,219$ 42$ Folsom Trail/City Creek Daylig 8417010 146$ -$ -$ 146$ Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 23,530$ 23,000$ -$ 530$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,110$ -$ -$ 1,110$ Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 224,247$ 188,467$ 34,134$ 1,646$ C 9line park 8416005 21,958$ 19,702$ -$ 2,256$ Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ JR Boat Ram 8420144 15,561$ -$ 7,763$ 7,798$ Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 12,795$ 4,328$ -$ 8,467$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 10,830$ -$ -$ 10,830$ Park refunds 8416008 11,796$ -$ -$ 11,796.28$ IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 58,014$ -$ 1,905$ 56,109$ Parks Impact Fee Refunds 8418015 101,381$ -$ -$ 101,381.06 UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 135,084$ 21,169$ 1,355$ 112,560$ FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 722,920$ 571,809$ 3,343$ 147,769$ Three Creeks West Bank NewPark 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$ 9Line Orchard 8420136 195,045$ 32,650$ -$ 162,395$ RAC Playground with ShadeSails 8422415 180,032$ -$ -$ 180,032$ Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 523,889$ 284,846$ 11,297$ 227,746$ Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 388,477$ 59,106$ 64,495$ 264,877$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 275,000$ -$ -$ 275,000$ Bridge to Backman 8418005 290,276$ 10,285$ 4,515$ 275,475$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Historic Renovation AllenParK 8422410 420,000$ -$ -$ 420,000$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 425,000$ -$ -$ 425,000$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 489,688$ 64,333$ -$ 425,355$ Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 431,000$ -$ -$ 431,000$ Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 510,000$ -$ -$ 510,000$ Green loop 200 E Design 8422408 610,000$ -$ -$ 610,000$ Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,094,430$ 8,302$ 25,921$ 1,060,208$ SLCFoothillsTrailheadDevelpmnt 8422412 1,304,682$ -$ -$ 1,304,682$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,343,904$ 107,850$ 121,172$ 3,114,882$ GlendaleWtrprk MstrPln&Rehab 8422406 3,200,000$ 21,800$ -$ 3,178,200$ Grand Total 16,694,447$ 2,471,367$ 403,507$ 13,819,573$ Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Street Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Street Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YTD Sum of Street Allocation Remaining Appropriation 700 South Reconstruction 8415004 2,449$ -$ 2,449$ -$ 9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 152,500$ 139,280$ 13,220$ -$ Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ 13,000$ -$ -$ 500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 32,718$ 16,691$ 16,027$ -$ Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 95,653$ 20,953$ 73,999$ 700$ D Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 1,444$ -$ -$ 1,444$ Gladiola Street 8406001 16,109$ 13,865$ -$ 2,244$ Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$ Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 25,398$ -$ -$ 25,398$ 900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 28,000$ -$ -$ 28,000$ 1700S Corridor Transfrmtn IF 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$ Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 35,392$ -$ -$ 35,392$ 200S TransitCmpltStrtSuppl IF 8422602 37,422$ -$ -$ 37,422$ Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 58,780$ 20,697$ -$ 38,083$ 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$ Transportatn Safety Imprvmt IF 8422620 44,400$ -$ -$ 44,400$ Local Link Construction IF 8422606 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 900 S Signal Improvements IF 8422615 70,000$ -$ -$ 70,000$ 400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 90,000$ -$ -$ 90,000$ Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 200,000$ -$ 12,484$ 187,516$ TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 302,053$ -$ -$ 302,053$ IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$ Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 2,250,220$ 290,460$ 1,216,451$ 743,309$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8419008 221,688$ 213,483$ 8,205$ -$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8420105 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 875,000$ 87,063$ -$ 787,937$ Grand Total 5,967,404$ 1,155,677$ 1,416,728$ 3,394,999$ Total 25,400,567$ 3,922,119$ 3,788,672$ 17,689,776$ E = A + B + C + D TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE UnAllocated Budget Amount 8484001 471,211$ $1,644,113 20,409,744$ 8484002 8484003 8484005 11,709,246$ 6,585,173$ ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 1/27/2022 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 1/27/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 1/27/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Planning Commission. STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan jessi.eagan@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Planning Commission. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Rich Tuttle as a member of the Planning Commission. ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 January 27, 2022 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Dugan, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Planning Commission. Rich Tuttle - to be appointed for a four year term starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 1/27/2022 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 1/27/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 1/27/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: City and County Building Conservation and Use Committee. STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan jessi.eagan@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: City and County Building Conservation and Use Committee. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Catherine Tucker as a member of the City and County Building Conservation and Use Committee. ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 January 27, 2022 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Dugan, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the City and County Building Conservation and Use Committee. Catherine Tucker - to be appointed for a four year term ending July 20, 2026, starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 2/11/2022 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 2/11/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 2/11/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Bicycle Advisory Committee. STAFF CONTACT: DOCUMENT TYPE: Jessi Eagan jessi.eagan@slcgov.com Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Sarah Johnson as a member of the Bicycle Advisory Committee. ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 February 11, 2022 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Dugan, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Bicycle Advisory Committee. Sarah Johnson - to be appointed for a three year term ending September 29, 2025, starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 2/11/2022 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 2/11/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 2/11/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Transportation Advisory Board. STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan jessi.eagan@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment: Transportation Advisory Board. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Tyler Schmidt as a member of the Transportation Advisory Board. / ( ) ,,,,,,,11111 ,,.,,,' ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 February 11, 2022 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Dugan, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Transportation Advisory Board. Tyler Schmidt - to be appointed for a three year term ending September 29, 2025, starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File .. Ji. .. '• / ;\ trfj \ .. l ,,,,, u111 ,v·'