The URL can be used to link to this page

07/12/2022 - Work Session - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WORK SESSION July 12,2022 Tuesday 2:00 PM Council Work Room 451 South State Street Room 326 Salt Lake City,UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com 7:00 pm Formal Meeting Room 326 (See separate agenda) Welcome and public meeting rules In accordance with State Statute and CityOrdinance,the meeting may be held electronically.After 5:00 p.m.,please enter the City & County Buildingthrough the main east entrance. The Work Session is a discussion among Council Members and select presenters.The public is welcome to listen.Items scheduled on the WorkSession or Formal Meeting may be moved and /ordiscussed during a different portionof the Meeting basedon circumstance or availability of speakers. Please note:Dates not identifiedin the FYI -Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined.Item start times and durations are approximateandare subject to change at the Chair’s discretion. Generated:10:03:26 The Council has returned to a hybrid meeting approach.The hybrid meeting enables people joining remotely or in-person to listen to the Council meeting and participate during public comment items. Public Comments:The public can give comments to the Council during the meetings online through Webex or in-person in Room 326 of the City and County Building.In- person attendees can fill out a comment card and online participants will register through Webex in order to be added to the comment queue. Agenda &Registration Information:For more information,including Webex connection information,please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings.(A phone line will also be available for people whose only option is to call in.) Public Health Information:Masks are no longer required in City Facilities,but are welcome for any attendees who prefer to continue using them.We will continue to monitor the situation take any reasonable precautions for the public and staff. Work Session Items 1.Informational:Updates from the Administration ~2:00 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress.Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed),services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness,active public engagement efforts,and projects or staffing updates from City Departments,or other items as appropriate. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 2.Informational:Equity Update ~2:30 p.m. 15 min. The Council will hold a discussion about various initiatives led by the City's Office of Equity and Inclusion.These initiatives include,but are not limited to,improving racial equity and justice in policing.Discussion may also include updates on the City's other work to achieve equitable service delivery,decision-making,and community engagement through the Citywide Equity Plan,increased ADA resources,language access,and other topics addressed in the ongoing work of the Human Rights Commission,the Racial Equity in Policing Commission,and the Accessibility &Disability Commission. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 3.Ordinance:Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)and Gender Equity ~2:45 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would enact chapter 10.08 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to gender equity.This proposed ordinance requires an intersectional gender analysis be conducted every five years,establishes the Chief Equity Officer as oversight personnel (in conjunction with the volunteer-based Human Rights Commission),recommends funding to support the intersectional gender equity analysis,and requires the City have a compensation policy on equal pay for equal work. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,July 12,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,July 19,2022 4.Resolution:General Obligation Bond and Sales Tax Revenue Bond ~3:05 p.m. 30 min. The Council will continue deliberating the proposed General Obligation (GO)Bond for parks and public lands projects and the proposed Sales Tax Revenue Bond for investments in city owned historic properties and critical infrastructure,among other projects.Per state law,a GO bond must be approved by the Council at least 75 days before Election Day.A GO bond would be on the November 2022 ballot for voters to decide whether the City can issue the new debt.The Sales Tax Revenue Bond would be approved by the Council and does not have a legal deadline for the decision. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,July 12,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -TBD Hold hearing to accept public comment -TBD TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD 5.Resolution:Capital Improvement Program Projects Follow-up ~3:35 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP)which involves the construction,purchase or renovation of buildings,parks,streets or other city-owned physical structures.Generally,projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more.The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in the annual budget process,while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same year. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,June 7,2022;Thursday,June 9,2022;Tuesday,June 14,2022;and Tuesday,July 12,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,June 7,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,July 12,2022 and Tuesday,August 9,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD 6.Tentative Break ~4:05 p.m. 20 min. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -n/a Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 7.Informational:Update on the Anti-Gentrification and Displacement Plan, Thriving In Place ~4:25 p.m. 45 min The Council will receive a follow-up briefing from the Community and Neighborhoods Department (CAN)and their consultants about the City’s anti-gentrification and displacement plan,known as Thriving in Place.This will include an update on the results of the team’s community engagement and “data mapping”to date. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 12,2022 and Tuesday,July 12,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 8.Informational:Midpoint Check-in on Ballpark Station Area Plan ~5:10 p.m. 45 min The Council will receive a midpoint briefing about the Ballpark Station Area Plan,which is currently proceeding in the Planning Division.The Ballpark Station Area Plan is intended to set a framework to help guide growth-related issues and to capitalize on the Ballpark as the neighborhood’s central public asset.The Ballpark Station Area Plan will encompass the area that runs roughly between 900 South to 1700 South,and State Street to I-15.The small area plan’s boundaries are within both the Central Community Master Plan and the Downtown Master Plan. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,July 12,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a 9.Resolution:Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement with the Utah Transit Authority (UTA)Written Briefing - The Council will receive a written briefing about a resolution that would authorize the Mayor to enter into two proposed adjustments to an interlocal agreement (ILA)with UTA.Amendment to Addendum No.3 provides accounting adjustments and credits to the City for cost savings from COVID-19 related bus service reductions,reaching service thresholds,and actual fuel costs.Addendum No.6 is the service agreement for the Frequent Transit Network (FTN)routes on 200 South,900 South,and 2100 South and addition of FTN Route 1 on 1000 North/South Temple.The ILA is a twenty-year agreement with a goal of full implementation of the FTN as described in the City’s Transit Master Plan.Note that the Plan identifies an FTN route on 600 North which UTA is implementing outside of the ILA with the City based on ridership levels and significance to the regional network. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,July 12,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,July 19,2022 10.Board Appointment:Transportation Advisory Board –Johnnae Nardone ~5:55 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Johnnae Nardone prior to considering appointment to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 29,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,July 12,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,July 12,2022 11.Board Appointment:Transportation Advisory Board –Leo Masic ~6:00 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Leo Masic prior to considering appointment to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 29,2025. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,July 12,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,July 12,2022 12.Board Appointment:Human Rights Commission –Olivia A.Jaramillo ~6:05 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Olivia A.Jaramillo prior to considering appointment to the Human Rights Commission for a term ending December 20,2026. FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,July 12,2022 Set Public Hearing Date -n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,July 12,2022 Standing Items 13.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. 14.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director - - Report of the Executive Director,including a review of Council information items and announcements.The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business,including but not limited to scheduling items. 15.Tentative Closed Session The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session.A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including,but not limited to: a.discussion of the character,professional competence,or physical or mental health of an individual; b.strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase,exchange,or lease of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if public discussion of the transaction would: (i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration;or (ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if: (i)public discussion of the transaction would: (A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration;or (B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale;and (iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel,devices,or systems;and g.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code §78B-1-137,and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 5:00 p.m.on _____________________,the undersigned,duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1)posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701,and (2)a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. CINDY LOU TRISHMAN SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda,including but not limited to adoption,rejection,amendment,addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City &County Building is an accessible facility.People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation,which may include alternate formats,interpreters,and other auxiliary aids and services.Please make requests at least two business days in advance.To make a request,please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com,801-535-7600,or relay service 711. Administrative updates July 12, 2022 June 14 This week COVID-19 update Current status summary SL County levels are considered "elevated" and the most recent wastewater sample shows a substantial increase. Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5 are thought to be more transmissible than previous subvariants, and according to recent CDC data BA.5 accounts for more than half of current COVID cases in the US. According to experts, the BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants seem to have the ability to evade some antibodies produced after vaccinations and infections, including those caused by other Omicron subvariants. According to the NYT, cases in Utah are only up 1% in the past 14 days, with Utah as the 27th fastest-growing state for new cases. Weekly watering guide https://conservewater.utah.gov/weekly-lawn-watering-guide/ Each watering should apply ½” of water. To determine how long your stations should run to apply a ½”, we recommend getting a Water Check or doing a DIY water check. Report sprinkler issues via SLCMobile www.slc.gov/feedback/ Regularly updated with highlighted ways to engage with the City. Community Engagement Highlights Transportation •300 North Reconstruction •Two initial concepts are available •Navigate to survey through feedback page •1100 East / Highland Drive Reconstruction •Business workshop this Wednesday 7/13 •2100 South Reconstruction •Survey opening soon through end of the month slc.gov/transportation Public Utilities •Adopt a Storm Drain Program •Sign up online -slc.gov/utilities/adoptastormdrain •South Temple Storm Drain Rehabilitation •Construction begins today through September 20th •Water Reclamation Facility •Construction brochure updating progress coming soon. slc.gov/utilities Sustainability •Community Renewable Energy Program •Plan for Low-Income Assistance •EV-Ready Ordinance (In collaboration with Planning) •Planning commission July 13th slc.gov/sustainability Homelessness Update: HRC and Overflow Occupancy July 4 –8, 2022 STH -1000 West Men's HRC STH -King Women's HRC STH -Miller Mixed HRC Total Shelter Capacity 300 200 200 700 Avg number of beds occupied/night 287 195 200 682 Avg number of beds unoccupied/night 13 5 0 18 Avg % of beds occupied/night 95.7%97.5%100%97.4% Avg % of beds unoccupied/night 4.3%2.5%0%2.6% Resource Fair: July 8 @ Tracy Aviary Jordan Nature Center In partnership with South Salt Lake -Utah Naloxone -Powerful Moms Who Care -CCS/Weigand Center -SLC Justice Courts •3rd District cases •SLCJC Cases •West Valley Cases •SL County Cases 100 lunches-Lyons Club donations Kayak Court: July 15th @ Jordan River Homelessness Update Contact/ Intake: 801-990-9999 Unsheltered Heat Wave Response -Weigand Center/ St. Vincent de Paul Dining Hall -City and County Libraries -County Recreation & Senior Centers -VOA Street Outreach -HRC hydration stations Homelessness Update Salt Lake City Mayor’s Office of Equity & Inclusion KALETTA LYNCH, CHIEF EQUITY OFFICER Roxana Orellana Language Access Coordinator (Coordinates Interpretation & Translation Services Citywide - Language Access Plan) Kaletta Lynch Chief Equity Officer (Development & Implementation of Citywide Equity Plan) Moana Uluave-Hafoka Equity Manager (Manages Racial Equity In Policing Commission & Human Rights Commission Darby Egbert Equity Coordinator for Special Projects (Manages Government Alliance for Racial Equity Ambassadors Program) Ashley Lichtle ADA Coordinator (Manages Accessibility & Disability Commission) Fatima Dirie Policy Advisor for Refugees and New Americans (Coordinates Know Your Neighbor Volunteer Program with State Refugee Office) Maria Romero Executive Assistant to the Chief Equity Officer & Director of Homeless Policy & Outreach (also serves as Intern Coordinator) Michelle Mooney Equity Liaison (Assists w/ DEI Proclamations and management of social media Mayor’s Office of Equity & Inclusion What is GARE? Established in 2014, GARE, the Government Alliance on Race and Equity, is a national network of government, with over 400 members and 36 member jurisdictions (states), working to achieve racial equity and advance opportunities for all. What is the primary function of GARE? Supports a cohort of jurisdictions that are at the forefront of work to achieve racial equity Develops a “pathway for entry” into racial equity work for new jurisdictions from across the country Supports and builds local and regional collaborations that are broadly inclusive and focused on achieving racial equity. Learn more at https://www.racialequityalliance.org/ GARE in SLC §First municipality to join GARE network in Utah §Our efforts have helped to contribute to resources provided as best practices in the National portal §Recently renewed our membership allowing over 3,000 SLC employees full access to the GARE portal GARE Ambassador Program Overview June 2020: SLC joins GARE network to help guide citywide diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB) efforts and initiatives July 2021: SLC hires Equity Coordinator for Special Projects to oversee citywide GARE Ambassador Program September 2021: First GARE Ambassadors Meeting April 2022: Several SLC employees attend the annual GARE Membership Conference June 2022- December 2022: GARE Ambassadors outline program goals July 2022: SLC GARE membership renewed allowing 3,000+ employees full GARE portal access GARE Ambassador Responsibilities & Expectations Attend monthly GARE Ambassador meeting GARE implementation within their department Inter-departmental training and facilitation GARE SLC Program Report outlining next steps sent to Mayor Mendenhall for review Questions? Contact Darby Egbert, Equity Coordinator for Special Projects at Darby.Egbert@slcgov.com Racial Equity in Policing Commission •This month, the regular meeting is in summer recess and will reconvene in August. •Updating the REP Commission webpage. •Working with SLCPD on hiring process for local diversity trainers; providing feedback on the SRO MOU contract renegotiation with Jennifer Newell; and re-examining ways in which racial/ethnic data is collected in SLCPD. •Drafting the end of year report that will be presented to mayor and city council of the work completed, in-progress, and recommended in 2022. Human Rights Commission •This month, the regular meeting is in summer recess and will reconvene in August. •Updating the HRC webpage and drafting the end of year report that will be presented to mayor and city council of the work completed, in-progress, and recommended in 2022. •Vacancies ◦District 3, Candidate will be interviewed today ◦District 4 & 6 open due to recent commissioners moving out-of-state •Working with Andrew Johnston to support efforts in addressing homelessness in the City; reviewing and providing feedback for language access policy; and awaiting the CEDAW ordinance CEDAW Ordinance Overview o Codifies Chief Equity Officer as oversight personnel who will work with Human Rights Commission to review practices and policies as it relates to gender equity o Establishes Every Five Years an Intersectional Gender Analysis o Recommends funding to support the Intersectional Gender Analysis and its findings o Requires the city have a compensation policy on equal pay for equal work FOLLOW US @SLCOEI WWW.SLC.GOV/EQUITY/ THANK YOU ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Received: 4/7/22 Date Sent to Council: TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 4/5/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Kaletta Lynch, Chief Equity Officer, Office of Equity and Inclusion _____________ SUBJECT: Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)/Gender Equity Ordinance STAFF CONTACTS: Moana Uluave-Hafoka, Equity Manager, moana.uh@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Draft an ordinance amending Chapter 10.01 to include Section 10.01.020 and enacting Chapter 10.08 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Gender Equity. BUDGET IMPACT: Proposal for Salt Lake City based on populaton of women at 0.10 cents per woman who lives in Salt Lake City. According to the 2020 Census (48.5% of 200,963 Salt Lake City residents = 97,467 women), this budget proposal is just under $10,000. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: For the last decade, the Human Rights Commission has actively pursued research and policy recommendations to improve the lives of women and girls in Salt Lake City by implementing the principles of CEDAW or the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women. This proposed ordinance requires an intersectional gender analysis be conducted every five years, establishes an oversight personnel with the Chief Equity Officer (who will work in conjunction with the volunteer-based Human Rights Commission), recommends funding to support the intersectional gender equity analysis, and requires the city have a compensation policy on equal pay for equal work. NOTES: •Kaletta Lynch, Chief Equity Officer, and Moana Uluave-Hafoka, Equity Manager, plan to attend VIRTUALLY to present this ordinance proposal. •The Human Rights Commission reviewed this proposed ordinance and unanimously voted to support it. rachel otto (Apr 9, 2022 20:11 MDT) 04/09/2022 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2022 (An ordinance enacting Chapter 10.08 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to gender equity) An ordinance enacting Chapter 10.08 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the gender equity. WHEREAS, in 2016 Salt Lake City (the “City”) issued Resolution No. 9 of 2016 (the “2016 Resolution”), a joint resolution in support of Cities for CEDAW Initiative; WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council (the “Council”) desires to create a the position of chief equity officer for the purposes identified herein; WHEREAS, the Council desires to implement locally the principles of the United Nations Convention of the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (“CEDAW”); WHEREAS, there is a continued need for the City to protect the human rights of women and girls by addressing discrimination, including violence against women and girls, and to implement locally the principles of CEDAW. There is a need to analyze the operations, policies, and programs of the City to identify opportunities to advance towards the elimination of discrimination against women and girls; WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds it is determined to implement the principles set forth in the Declaration on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women and adopt measures necessary for the elimination of discrimination in all its forms and manifestations and hereby expresses its intent to agree to the following articles: Article 1: Defines discrimination against women as any “distinction, exclusion, or restriction made on the basis of sex which has the effect or purpose of impairing or nullifying the recognition, enjoyment or exercise by women, irrespective of marital status, on the basis of equality between men and women, of human rights or fundamental freedom in the political, economic, social, cultural, civil, or any other field.” Article 2. Mandates concrete steps, implementing laws, policies and practices to eliminate discrimination against women and embody the principle of equality. Article 3. Requires action in all fields political, economic, social, and cultural to advance the human rights of women. Article 4. Permits affirmative action measures to accelerate equality and eliminate discrimination. Article 5. Recognizes the role of culture and tradition and calls for the elimination of sex role stereotyping. Article 6. Requires suppression of traffic in women and exploitation of prostitutes. Article 7. Mandates ending discrimination against women in political and public life. Article 8. Requires action to allow women to represent their governments internationally on an equal basis with men. Article 9. Mandates that women will have equal rights with men to acquire, change or retain their nationality and that of their children. Article 10. Obligates equal access to all fields of education and the elimination of stereotyped concepts of the roles of men and women. Article 11. Mandates the end of discrimination in the field of employment and recognizes the right to work as a human right. Article 12. Requires steps to eliminate discrimination from the field of health care, including access to family planning. If necessary, these services must be free of charge. Article 13. Requires that women be ensured equal access to family benefits, bank loans, credit, sports and cultural life. Article 14. Focuses on the particular problems faced by rural women. Article 15. Guarantees equality before the law and equal access to administer property. Article 16. Requires steps to ensure equality in marriage and family relations. Article 17. Calls for the establishment of a committee to evaluate the progress of the implementation of CEDAW. Article 18. Sets forth elements of the operation of the treaty; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that adopting this ordinance promotes the health, safety, and public welfare of the citizens of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 10.01. That Chapter 10.01 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and is hereby amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 10.01 EQUITY AND INCLUSION SECTION: 10.01.010: Purpose 10.01.020: Chief Equity Officer 10.01.010: PURPOSE: It is the intent and purpose of this title to protect the human rights of the citizens of the city of Salt Lake (the "city"). The city is comprised of diverse and varied groups, communities, and individuals. Protection of human rights is critical therefore to the general welfare of the city. The provisions of this title are to be liberally construed to achieve that purpose 10.01.020: CHIEF EQUITY OFFICER A. This Section hereby establishes the position of chief equity officer. The Mayor shall appoint, with advice and consent of the city council, a chief equity officer. B. Among other responsibilities, the chief equity officer shall: • Make equity and inclusion policy and strategy recommendations to the Mayor. • Work with city departments and consultants to help ensure all programs and services include an equity tool and are being designed using an equity lens. • Oversee the development and implementation of a citywide equity master plan. • Oversee the development and implementation of a citywide language access policy, which shall include a plan for contracting with interpretation and translation services. • Provide administrative support to the racial equity in policing commission, the human rights commission, and the accessibility and disability commission. • Perform the functions identified in Section 10.08.030. SECTION 1. Enacting the Text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 10.08. That Chapter 10.08 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and is hereby enacted to read as follows: CHAPTER 10.08 GENDER EQUITY SECTION: 10.08.010: Purpose 10.08.020: Definitions 10.08.030: Intersectional Gender Analysis and Action Plan 10.08.040: Gender Discrimination 10.08.050: Equal Pay without Regard to Gender 10.08.010: PURPOSE: It shall be the goal of the city to address discrimination against women and girls. In doing so, the city aspires to achieve the principles identified in CEDAW. This Chapter provides for methods in which the city can identify practices and policies and implement changes to help further the following goals of CEDAW: A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1. Look for ways to improve the city’s commitment to the elimination of discrimination against women and girls in the city in economic opportunities, including, but not limited to: a. employment opportunities, including the application of the same criteria for selection in matters of employment and the right to receive access to vocational training for nontraditional jobs; b. promotion, job security and all benefits and conditions of service, regardless of parental status, particularly encouraging the appointment of women to decision-making positions, city revenue generating posts, and managing commissions and departments; c. equal renumeration, including benefits and equal pay with respect to work of equal value; d. protection of heath and safety in working conditions, including supporting efforts not to purchase sweatshop good and slavery-produced goods, regular inspection of work premises, protection from harassment and violent acts in workplaces, and reasonable accommodations for pregnant and nursing mothers; e. Encourage and, where possible, support the necessary social services to enable all people to combine family obligations with work responsibilities and participation in public life, in particular, through promoting the establishment and development of an accessible, affordable, and qualify network of child care facilities, paid family leave, and family-friendly policies; f. Promote access to safe and affordable housing and transportation; and g. Encourage the use of public education and all other available means to urge financial institutions to facilitate women’s access to bank accounts, loans, mortgages, and other forms of financial services. B. VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND GIRLS 1. Look for opportunities to pursue appropriate measures to prevent and redress sexual and domestic violence and trafficking of women and girls, including, but not limited to: a. Enforcement of criminal and civil remedies; b. Seek resources and encourage ways for survivors to receive appropriate protective and supportive services, including, but not limited to medical, counseling, shelter, rehabilitation programs, and hotline services; c. Provide gender sensitive training for city employees regarding sexual and domestic violence and trafficking of women and girls; and d. Identify ways for perpetrators of violence against women and girls to receive rehabilitative services. 2. Study how issues of labor trafficking, sexual exploitation and trafficking, and domestic servitude affect the city; and 3.Identify means in which the city can help identify how city construction projects are designed to promote the safety of women and girls. C. EDUCATION 1. Support schools in the city in delivering access to high quality education; and 2. Develop and manage out of school recreational programs in an equitable manner. D. DELIVERY OF CITY SERVICES 1. Gender equity shall permeate every level of city operations- as leaders, employers, and service providers; and 2. City services shall be delivered using a gender equity lens. 10.08.020: DEFINITIONS: Unless otherwise specified, the following terms as used in this chapter shall have the following meaning: CITY: Salt Lake City DISAGGREGATED DATA: information collected and analyzed by enumerated categories in order to identify the disparities existing between women and men. These categories shall include, to the extent permitted by law, sex, race, immigration status, parental status, language, sexual orientation, disability, age and other attributes. This data will be collected in a manner that will facilitate intersectional analysis. DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN: any difference in treatment based on race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, place of birth, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, familial status, age, handicap or disability, or use of support animals, as specified. GENDER: the ways society produces, positions, and polices women and men as “opposite,” mutually exclusive, natural categories of persons, and organizes ideas, interactions, and roles on the basis of presumed differences that establish hierarchies between women and men and among people. GENDER ANALYSIS: an intersectional examination of the cultural, economic, social, civil, legal, and political relations between women and men within a certain entity, recognizing that women and men and different aspects of social identify prescribe and proscribe different social roles, responsibilities, opportunities, and needs for people, and that these differences, which permeate our society, affect how decisions, including budgetary decisions, and policy are made. GENDER EQUITY: the redress of discriminatory practices and the establishment of conditions enabling women to achieve full equality with men, recognizing that needs of women and men may differ, resulting in fair and equitable outcomes for both. “Gender equity” shall further mean the redress of discriminatory practices and establishment of conditions enabling all persons identifying as transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming to achieve full equality. HUMAN RIGHTS: the rights every individual possesses that are intended to improve the conditions in society that protect each person’s dignity and well-being and the humanity of all people. RACIAL DISCRIMINATION: shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, color, descent, or national or ethnic origin, which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life. SEX: the gender of a person, as perceived, presumed or assumed by others, including those who are changing or have changed their gender identification. VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND GIRLS: any act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women and girls, including threats of those acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private life, including Domestic Violence. WOMEN: all persons who identify with the sex category woman, whether or not assigned to that category at birth. WORK OF EQUAL VALUE: that individuals in the same workplace be given equal pay and that there shall be no direct or indirect gender discrimination in relation to employment conditions including pay, benefits, and total compensation. Work of equal value can be determined by comparing job requirements, such as the level of skill, effort, decision-making, responsibility, and working conditions, as well as any other relevant criteria. 10.08.030: Intersectional Gender Analysis and Action Plan A. As a tool for assessing the success of the city in implementing locally the principles of CEDAW identified in Section 10.08.010, the chief equity officer shall ensure that each department of the city undergo an intersectional gender analysis and develop an action plan. B. The intersectional gender analysis shall include: 1. The collection of intersectionally disaggregated data; and 2. An evaluation of gender equity in the city’s operations, including budget allocations, delivery of direct and indirect services, and employment practices, and the city’s integration of the local principles of CEDAW. C. After the completion of an intersectional gender analysis, selected departments with the support of the chief equity officer shall develop an action plan that contains specific recommendations on how it will make efforts to correct deficiencies identified in the gender analysis. D. The chief equity officer shall provide a report on its intersectional gender analysis and department action plans to the human rights commission, the mayor, and the city council. E. The chief equity officer shall develop a five-year citywide action plan. F. The five-year citywide action plan shall address how to integrate the local principles of CEDAW, the deficiencies found in the gender analysis and the measures recommended to correct the deficiencies. G. The chief equity officer shall present the five-year citywide action plan to the human rights commission, the mayor, and the city council. 10.08.040: Gender Discrimination Discrimination and harassment on the basis of gender is prohibited in accordance with applicable law. The city shall provide for a process in which an employee may file a complaint of gender discrimination or harassment. 10.08.050: Equal Pay without Regard to Gender The city shall have a compensation policy premised on equal pay for equal work, without regard to gender. 10.08.060: Enforcement of the Ordinance In undertaking the enforcement of this Chapter, the city is assuming an undertaking only to promote the general welfare. The City is not assuming, nor is it imposing on its officers and employees, an obligation, the breach of which creates any liability in money damages to any person who claims that the breach proximately caused the injury. This Chapter does not create any private cause of action. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2022. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2022. Published: ______________. 4/4/2022 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:July 12, 2022 RE: Up to $65 Million of Bonds for Capital Improvements (Series 2022B and 2022C) ISSUE-AT-A-GLANCE The Administration transmitted a proposal for a $65 million Sales Tax Revenue Bond to fund several capital improvements. A summary table listing the projects, funding amount, percent of total and notes is shown on the next two pages. See Attachment 1 for a list of all proposed FY2023 capital investments in the sales tax bond, public lands General Obligation GO Bond and FY2023 CIP. See Attachment 2 for a table comparing sales tax and GO bonds. Highlights include: - Total project costs are estimated at $63.453 million ($1.5 million covers issuance costs) Note there are two bonds: $40.5 million tax-exempt and $22.9 million taxable. - There are two public lands project proposing $10 million for Pioneer Park and $11.2 million for roads in the City Cemetery. The separate $80 million General Obligation Bond proposal has several public lands projects. - The split of projects between the three categories is summarized in the adjacent pie chart. - The FY2023 annual budget includes $4.39 million in CIP for the first payments on the two bonds (taxable and tax exempt). The payments would be due June 30, 2023 which is the last day of FY2023. Another option is to pay capitalized interest during construction and delay the first full payments to FY2024, however, that approach would result in a greater total amount of debt over the life of the two bonds. Project Timeline: Budget Hearings: May 17 & June 7, 2022 Briefing: July 12, 2022 Follow-up Briefings: TBD Bond Public Hearing: TBD Potential Action: TBD Note: there is no legal deadline for the Council to authorize, adjust or decline the proposed bond Page | 2 Funding Project Name % Of Bond Notes $ 11,200,000 City Cemetery Road Repairs / Reconstruction 18% • Total road repairs and reconstruction estimated at $12.5 million (2020 Cemetery Master Plan) • There are an estimated $13+ million of other capital improvement needs at the Cemetery $ 10,000,000 Pioneer Park Improvements 16% • In FY2020 CIP, the Council approved $3.445 million of parks impact fees for Pioneer Park improvements. Public engagement is currently ongoing for selecting amenities and locations • Clarifying information on this and other Public Lands projects have been provided $ 9,753,000 600 North Corridor Transformation 15% • In FY2022 CIP, the Council approved over $1.8 million for this project $ 7,500,000 Radio Towers 12% • Part of a larger radio infrastructure upgrade project with a total estimated cost of $20 million • The FY2023 annual budget included $3.7 million for new radios $ 6,100,000 Central Plant Electrical Transformer Upgrade & Emergency Backup Generators 10% • Required by Rocky Mountain Power by end of 2024 • Without backup generators some systems and public services would be unavailable during a power outage • 70% construction designs informed cost estimate $ 6,100,000 Westside Railroad Quiet Zones 10% • Three at grade crossings would be improved to create a single quiet zone in residential neighborhood • Engineering reviewed cost estimate in September 2021 $ 6,000,000 Warm Springs Historic Plunge Structure Stabilization 9% • This funding is for structure stabilization including security and fire suppression systems • Building would not be ready for public or private uses • Could be combined with Fisher Mansion for $7.8 million available to both historic buildings • Council Members have recently expressed an interest in understanding how plans respect the Native American heritage of the site, which information is forthcoming $ 3,000,000 Smith's Ballpark Improvements 5% • Total deferred maintenance and improvements identified by the Facilities condition index (industry best practice) is estimated at over $12.7 million $ 2,000,000 Urban Wood Reutilization Equipment and Storage Additions 3% • New program would also require one or two new full- time City employees • Program is focused on recycling wood and using as mulch for playgrounds and wood for minor projects like tables, fences, and signs rather than sending to the landfill and could generate modest savings Page | 3 Funding Project Name % Of Bond Notes $ 1,800,000 Fisher Mansion Stabilization 3% • This funding is for structure stabilization • Building would not be ready for public or private uses • In FY2020 CIP, the Council funded almost $1.4 million for restoration of the Carriage House, and in FY2021 another $504,732 for construction overages • Could be combined with Warm Springs Historic Plunge for $7.8 million available to both historic buildings • Estimated cost for a full renovation depends on the proposed end uses. Estimates range from $4 million to $6 million $ 63,453,000 Green = Parks & Public Lands Blue = Facilities Orange = Transportation 100% • Additional funding up to $65 million includes costs of issuing the bonds and potential premium from investors • Depending on timing of Council approval and bond sales, an interest only payment may be needed in FY2023 and the first full payment would be in FY2024 Two Bonds: One Taxable, Another Tax-exempt – The proposed funding is split between $40.5 million tax- exempt and $22.9 million taxable. A project requires partial or full taxable bond funding if the resulting use is for private and/or for-profit. A taxable bond is more expensive financing than tax-exempt because of the additional tax cost and potential for a higher interest rate. The bonds can be structured to only pay interest for the first six months, 12 months, or 18 months. This approach could delay the first full debt payment of interest and principal until next fiscal year but at a greater total cost because a larger amount of interest would be paid over the life of the bond. Project Cost Estimates – The Council could discuss with the Administration about doing additional public engagement and/or design for some projects to better define designs (amenities, locations, programming, etc.) and costs before approving a bond. Some of the proposed projects do not have detailed budget breakdowns or engineering reviewed designs. Note that a few projects have gone through public engagement efforts such as the 600 North corridor transformation. Some City construction projects have experienced double-digit price increases this year due to pandemic-related economic impacts. It’s unclear how long these price fluctuations will continue. The Council could request a review of cost estimates, increase project-specific contingency funding, and/or add a general contingency reserve available to any project. Process to Adopt – It’s important to note that the proposed sales tax revenue bond only requires Council approval unlike a General Obligation bond which requires voter approval at the ballot box. The Council would need to adopt a public hearing resolution, set the date, and hold at least one public hearing about the bond. There is no legal deadline for the Council to authorize, adjust or decline the proposed bond. Funding Opportunity after Older Bond Paid Off Last Year – The Administration is proposing the bond now because an approximately $80 million bond was paid off in FY2021 which removed $5.3 million of annual debt payments. (Note: The savings on that debt has been used to balance the budget so far). In large part the size of the bond proposed is to account for the size of the debt service fitting into the annual budget. As part of the FY23 CIP debt service budget, the Council included $4.4 million for a first-year payment on the proposed bond. This funding could be used for other purposes if the Council declines to proceed with the bond or approves a smaller bond. If the Council approves a larger bond, then additional funding would need to be identified to make the first-year payment, or the Council could work with the Administration to identify timing of first-year payment. Long term the Council could accommodate larger bond payments but would need to adjust the budget to remain balanced. $300+ Million Unfunded Capital Needs Over Next Decade – Below is a short list of the City’s unfunded capital needs from large single-site projects to long-term best management of capital assets like buildings, streets, and Page | 4 vehicles. This list is not comprehensive, and some costs may be higher since originally estimated. The total unfunded needs of the below list exceed $300 million and may be closer to $500 million depending on the specifics of new construction projects in the first bullet point. Note that these estimates for new assets do not include maintenance costs. Typically, a Capital Facilities Plan, is the mechanism to identify, track, prioritize and schedule unfunded capital needs over a long-term horizon. While the City does long-term planning in each department, a capital facilities plan typically includes a broader citywide view. The Administration has indicated that there is ongoing work towards this goal. The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an update on this effort. $TBD new construction and major redevelopments: Fleet Block, eastside police precinct or smaller substations, multiple aging fire stations, The Leonardo (old library), expansion of the S-Line Streetcar, downtown TRAX loop, quiet zones and undergrounding rail lines that divide the City’s west and east sides, implementing rest of the 9-Line, Folsom and McClelland urban trails, historic structures like Fisher Mansion and Warm Springs, rehabilitation or full rebuild of vehicle bridges including 200 South and 400 South over the Jordan River, etc. $133 million over ten years (in addition to existing funding level) to increase the overall condition index of the City's street network from poor to fair $33.8 million over ten years to bring all City facilities out of deferred maintenance $25 million for capital improvements at the City Cemetery, of which $12.5 million is for road repairs $20 million for a new bridge at approx. 4900 West from 500 South to 700 South $20 million above existing funding levels to fully fund the City’s fleet needs $6 million for planned upgrades to the Regional Athletic Complex $3.1 million for downtown irrigation system replacement $1.3 million for solar panels, parking canopy and security upgrade at Plaza 349 PROJECT SPECIFIC POLICY QUESTIONS A.Adding, Removing and/or Changing Funding Level for Projects – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration if there are projects the Council wants to add, remove, modify the scope of work and/or change the proposed funding level. Does the Council want additional information on any proposed projects before scheduling a vote? The Council may also wish to discuss if the bond funding by category (see pie chart and table above) aligns with the Council’s policy priorities. B.End User(s) for Restoration of Fisher Mansion and Warm Springs Historic Plunge – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration what end users are intended for restoration of these historic facilities, including the extent to which Native American heritage is reflected on the Warm Springs site? Note there are several historic structures in Allen Park which has proposed funding in the $80 million General Obligation GO bond. C.Splitting $7.8 Million between Fisher Mansion and Warm Springs Historic Plunge – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration whether the funding should be considered combined or separate for these two buildings. The proposal includes a note stating the $1.8 million to stabilize Fisher Mansion and the $6 million for Warm Springs Historic Plunge could be combined. However, the two funding amounts are listed separately. It’s worth noting that the Fisher Mansion is estimated to be 2,800 square feet of interior space and Warm Springs 40,785 square feet. A 2018 development scenario to make Warm Springs ready for public and/or private uses estimated the total construction cost at $6.5 million. The cost for a similar development is likely significantly higher in the current economy. No end users have been identified for either property. D.Historic Preservation and Disposal of Underutilized Property – In earlier discussions some Council Members raised the question to what extent is the City’s role in preserving historic buildings? Council Members also expressed an interest in fully funding a development scenario for the Fisher Mansion and/or Warm Springs Historic Plunge to be ready for public and/or private uses. Council Members may wish to discuss the City’s role and what amount would be necessary for the bond to make these historic buildings ready for use. E.$20 million Radio Towers and Equipment Replacement Project – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how the overall project could be funded, why the replacements are needed and what new capabilities would be available to the City. Page | 5 F.Projects Increasing Workload and Need for New Full-time Employees: The Council may wish to ask the Administration which projects would create the need for new full-time employees, when that new staffing need would begin (pending completion of construction in some cases), and how they would be funded. GENERAL POLICY QUESTIONS 1.$80 Million GO Bond for Parks and Public Lands and Sales Tax Revenue Bond – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration why certain projects are recommended to be in the sales tax revenue bond vs. the GO bond for parks and public lands. 2.Conditions on Projects and/or Bond – The Council may wish to discuss whether to add any conditions on the bond funding or requests to the Administration such as providing status updates to the public as projects progress, notification of any scope reductions or making project funding contingent upon certain conditions. 3.Need and Ability to Spend Tax-exempt Bond Funds within Three Years – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how tax-exempt bond funds will be spent within the legally required three years, especially if additional engagement/design work is needed to finalize costs. This could include the Engineering Division’s capacity to absorb the additional workload, availability of contractors in the local market, phasing projects over multiple bond issuances (which is a common strategy), and if CIP projects could be delayed. While taxable bond funds do not have a legally required spending deadline there is a practical concern to spend before they lose significant amounts of purchasing power. 4.$300+ Million Unfunded Capital Needs and Bond Proposals – The Council may wish to discuss how to balance the City’s $300+ million unfunded capital needs including deferred maintenance for existing assets with funding construction of new assets that will create new unfunded maintenance needs including increased staffing workloads. 5.Public Engagement – The Council may wish to discuss what public engagement should look like for the bond and individual projects. The Council may also wish to ask the Administration about public engagement efforts for projects so far and how residents can provide feedback on the other projects. 6.Project Prioritization – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration which projects to prioritize for the following situations: a. Excess funds are available to go to another project b. Actual costs exceed available project budget, and a project (or multiple projects) must be reduced in scope c. A project will not be constructed because available funding is significantly less than needed even after scope reductions 7.American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funding for Bond Projects – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration the option to use ARPA funding for bond projects eligible under the Treasury’s final guidance. 8.CIP Debt Level – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration what debt level in CIP is preferred to balance long-term bond payments with annual CIP project funding needs. The proposed bonds would have an annual debt service payment of nearly $4.4 million. See Additional Info section for debt service payments out to FY2026. ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION CIP Debt Load Projections through FY2026 The Administration provided the following chart to illustrate the ratio of ongoing commitments to available funding for projects over the next six fiscal years. Most of these commitments are debt payments on existing bonds. Other commitments include, ESCO debt payments, the Crime Lab lease, capital replacement funding for parks and facilities, contributions to the CIP cost overrun account and the 1.5% for art fund. The CIP Budget Book includes an overview and details on each of the ongoing commitments. 79% of the General Fund transfer into CIP was needed for these ongoing commitments in FY2021. Note that the chart does not reflect the proposed bond which would increase annual debt service payments and reduce funding available for CIP projects. Page | 6 The projected debt load significantly decreased in FY2022 because Series 2014A Taxable Refunding of 2005 bonds matured (paid off). It was approximately $80 million when the bond was originally issued (before refunding). This reduces the debt load from 79% to 45% and removes a $5.3 million annual debt payment. The Mayor is recommending a new sales tax revenue bond totaling $65 million with an estimated annual debt payment over $4.4 million. Note that General Obligation (G.O.) bonds are not paid from CIP because they are funded through a separate, dedicated voter-approved property tax increase. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Allocation of CIP General Fund Transfer Amount, 6 Year Projection, assuming 2% revenue growth per year, and continued allocation of 7% of GF revenue to CIP Debt Service On Bonds Other Debt Service Other Commitments Pay as You Go Projects Cost Overrun Account At the time of publishing this staff report, the account has an available to spend balance of $910,720. The Council established this account for projects that experience costs slightly higher than budgeted. A formula determines how much additional funding may be pulled from the Cost Overrun account depending on the total Council-approved budget. This process allows the Administration to add funding to a project without returning to the Council in a budget amendment. A written notification to the Council on uses is required. The purpose is to allow projects to proceed with construction instead of delaying projects until the Council can act in a budget amendment which typically takes a few months. Fisher Mansion Feasibility Analysis SLC has commissioned CRSA Architects to conduct a feasibility analysis for restoring and establishing active use in the Fisher Mansion building. CRSA’s work will look at a series of conceptual alternatives, including the adaptive reuse of the Mansion as a food & beverage + music & art venue, and alternately as a café and exhibition gallery space with office space for city staff and/or community organizations, along with a reimagined outdoor plaza for activities and events. ATTACHMENTS 1. FY2023 Capital Investments Summary Sheet (GO Bond, Sales Tax Bond, and CIP Projects) Note this is also attached to the CIP staff report 2. Comparison Table of Sales Tax and GO Bond Questions Page | 7 ACRONYMS ARPA – American Rescue Plan Act CAN – Community and Neighborhoods Department CFP – Capital Facilities Plan CIP – Capital Improvement Program ESCO – Energy Service Companies FY – Fiscal Year G.O. Bond – General Obligation bond HUD – U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department Names of Projects Departments Sales Tax Bond GO Bond General Fund GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX ARPA Sales Tax Bonds City Cemetery Road Repairs / Reconstruction Public Lands $11,200,000 Pioneer Park Improvements Public Lands $10,000,000 Eligible 600 North Corridor Transformation Transporation $9,753,000 10% Eligible Radio Towers IMS $7,500,000 Central Plant Electrical Transformer Upgrade & Emergency Backup Generators Public Services $6,100,000 Westside Railroad Quiet Zones Public Services $6,100,000 Warm Spring Historic Plunge Structure Stabilization Public Services $6,000,000 Smith's Ballpark Improvements Public Services $3,000,000 Urban Wood Reutilization Equipment and Storage Additions Public Lands $2,000,000 Fisher Mansion Stabilization Public Services $1,800,000 GO Bond (to be considered by voters - would not impact FY 23 property taxes) Glendale Regional Park Public Lands $27,000,000 100% Eligible Eligible Jordan River Corridor Improvements Public Lands $9,000,000 Partially Eligible Allen Park Public Lands $9,000,000 100% Eligible Seven Neighborhood Parks, 1 per district Public Lands $7,000,000 $3 million Eligible Fleet Block Park Public Lands $5,000,000 100% Eligible Eligible Liberty Park Playground Public Lands $2,000,000 Folsom Trail Completion Public Lands $5,000,000 100% Eligible 20% contingency Public Lands $16,000,000 400 South Safety Improvements Transporation $513,313 200 South Reconstruction / Transit Corridor Supplement Transporation $2,700,242 $2,643 $252,000 $1,300,000 Three Creeks West Roadways Public Lands & Public Utilities $1,359,130 300 North Complete Street Reconstruction Supplement Transporation $500,000 $40,000 Rose Park Neighborhood Center Community Garden Public Lands $160,819 Eligible Street Improvements 2022/2023 Public Services $3,000,000 Public Lands Asset Management Plan Public Lands $160,160 Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments Transporation $990,000 $110,000 Facilities Asset Renewal Plan FY23 Public Services $1,192,357 Bridge Replacement (650 North over Jordan River)Public Services $3,700,000 Public Way Concrete 2022/2023 Public Services $436,281 Alleyway Improvements 2022/2023 Engineering $142,919 Urban Farm Development at 2200 West Public Lands $425,040 Eligible RAC Playground Phase II Public Lands $521,564 700 South (Phase 7, 4600 W to 5000 W)Engineering $850,000 $1,120,000 900 South River Park Soccer Field Public Lands $287,848 Memorial Tree Groves Design and Infrastructure Public Lands $867,962 Streets Steam Bay Expansion Public Services $597,792 Restoration of CCB Reimburse by Insurance Public Services $2,000,000 Hand Held Radios IMS $3,700,000 Complete Streets Transporation $3,700,000 Parks Maintenance Public Lands $2,000,000 Maintenance of Vacant City Owned Facilities Public Services $700,000 Totals $63,453,000 $80,000,000 $13,234,877 $5,035,000 $3,000,000 $3,360,193 $8,700,000 $0 Total Bonds $143,453,000 Total CIP $33,330,070 Total Investment (Bonds & CIP)$176,783,070 CIP New/Maintenance Projects Recommended for Funding Attachment 1 - FY2023 Capital Investments Summary Sheet (GO Bond, Sales Tax Bond and CIP) Last Updated June 10, 2022 Names of Projects Departments Sales Tax Bond GO Bond General Fund GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX ARPA California Avenue Safety Improvement Study Transportation 100,000$ 1000 W Fairpark Traffic Circle Transportation 569,534$ 900 West Corridor Transportation & Public Utilities 1,000,000$ 2100 South Conceptual Design / Corridor Transformation Transportation 250,000$ Livable Streets Implementation Transportation 2,700,000$ 300,000$ Highland Drive / 1100 E Complete Street & Parley's Trail Supplement (1700 S-I-80)Transportation 245,000$ 3,255,000$ Public Lands ADA Walkway and Asphalt Replacement Public Lands 873,062$ Jordan River Peace Labyrinth Park Improvements Public Lands 500,000$ Eligible Playground Replacement Public Lands 1,874,063$ Madsen Park Renewal Public Lands 500,000$ Folsom Trail Landscaping Phase I Public Lands 1,767,908$ Liberty Wells Traffic Calming Transportation 420,000$ Cottonwood Park Pavilions Public Lands 756,094$ 400 North Street Improvement Transportation 599,746$ Court Resurfacing Public Lands 1,478,739$ Ballpark Study Implementation - Phase 1 Transportation 450,000$ 50,000$ Local Streets 2023 Reconstruction Supplement Transportation 200,000$ SLC Cemetery Infrastructure Repairs Public Lands 500,000$ 1000 W intersection upgrades at 300 N and 400 N Transportation 539,693$ Tree Succession Design for Liberty Park Public Lands 90,160$ Jordan River Tree Planting and Irrigation Public Lands 210,834$ Riverview Native Plant Center Phase 1A Public Lands 412,160$ Sugar House Safe Side Streets Part 2 Transportation 400,000$ Replacement Traffic Signals (4)Transportation 1,260,000$ 140,000$ Brentwood Circle Storm Water Drainage Public Utilities 160,129$ Partially Eligible Multi-modal Transportation Safety Improvements Transportation 270,000$ 30,000$ Taufer Park Revamp Public Lands 50,000$ Library Plaza Repair and Improvements Public Lands 205,755$ Replacement Traffic Signal; Asset Condition Report Transportation 415,000$ 35,000$ NW Quadrant trails and Greenway Planning Public Lands 257,600$ Future Transformations: Corridor and Area Studies Transportation 150,000$ Reopen Dinwoody Park as a Public Park Public Lands 71,198$ Folsom Trail- Request on behalf of River District Business Alliance Transportation 500,000$ Bridge Replacement (200 South over Jordan River)Public Services 3,500,000$ Public Lands 5-Year Strategic Plan Public Lands 154,000$ Bridge Rehabilitation (400 South over the Jordan River)Public Services 1,700,000$ Replace Fairpark Tennis Courts with New Sports Court Public Lands 496,109$ Jordan Park and International Peace Gardens Master Plan and CLR Public Lands 251,160$ 1200 East Median, Raise Curb, new irrigation, new tree planting Public Lands 500,000$ Neighborhood Identification Equity Project Transportation 245,215$ Urban Wood Reutilization Public Lands 206,080$ Mixed-Use Three-Story Fire Prop Fire 856,690$ Memory Grove Master Plan and Cultural Landscape Report Public Lands 341,320$ Gateway Triangle Property Park Public Lands 499,563$ Multimodal Capital Maintenance Transportation 225,000$ 25,000$ CIP Projects NOT Recommeded for Funding (in order of CDCIP Board Scores) Attachment 1 - FY2023 Capital Investments Summary Sheet (GO Bond, Sales Tax Bond and CIP) Last Updated June 10, 2022 Names of Projects Departments Sales Tax Bond GO Bond General Fund GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX ARPA Rose Park Open Space Concepts Public Lands 154,560$ Back Alley Block Project Public Services 517,500$ Lindsey Gardens Natural Springs Pollinator Garden Public Lands 500,000$ Rail Adjacent Pavement Improvements 2022/2023 Public Services 70,000$ 337 S 400 E Pocket Park Improvement Public Lands 54,096$ Rose Park Community Pump Track Public Lands 498,584$ Training Ground Site Improvements Fire 755,991$ Sunnyside Ave Pedestrian Safety Improvements Transportation 514,688$ Yalecrest Traffic Calming Transportation 240,000$ East Bench Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Safety Transportation 467,929$ Jefferson Park Walking Path Public Lands 496,472$ Project Management Software Renewal Public Services 79,999$ Wingpointe Levee Design Public Services 800,000$ Welcome Signage Transportation 500,000$ Mountain Dell Disc Golf Course Public Lands 500,000$ Sugar House Crosswalk Murals Transportation 50,000$ First Encampment Park Public Lands 363,916$ 1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk Public Services & Public Utilities 275,919$ South Belaire Dr Road Reconstruction Public Services 699,650$ Repair Alley #4195 after 9th South rebuild project Public Services 72,450$ Pave Benchmark Circle Public Services 199,307$ Harvey Milk Blvd. Rainbow Crosswalk Transportation 459,346$ Storm Drains 1100 East South of Zenith Ave Public Utilities 92,735$ Notes: The Public Services Department includes the Facilities Division (city owned buildings) and the Engineering Division (street and alley projects) The GF FOF column includes funding proposed for parks maintenance and an amount "off the top" available to any capital project The Impact Fees column includes transportation impact fees and parks impact fees Attachment 1 - FY2023 Capital Investments Summary Sheet (GO Bond, Sales Tax Bond and CIP) Last Updated June 10, 2022 Bond When does the Council need to decide? Who picks projects and amounts? What kinds of projects are eligible? Who has final approval power? How is it repaid?When must funds be spent?What else to know? Sales Tax Revenue Bond No legal deadline for Council to decide Council selects projects and funding amounts Capital improvement projects but not operations or maintenance* Council makes final decision The General Fund transfers to CIP each year to cover debt payments on sales tax revenue bonds A taxable sales tax bond must have funds spent within three years of issuance A tax-exempt bond does not have a spending deadline Second cheapest way for the City to issue debt Subject to debt coverage ratio which is less than GO Bonds General Obligation (G.O.) Bond August 16 is the last regularly scheduled Council meeting to place on the November 2022 ballot Decision must be at least 75 days before Election Day Council selects projects and funding amounts Capital improvement projects but not operations or maintenance* Voters make final decision Voters approve a property tax increase on themselves when approving G.O. bonds, and that levy directly pays the bond debt The levy is automatically eliminated when the bond is paid off, so property taxes go back down Bond must be issued within 10 years of voter approval Issuing bonds sooner is preferrable because inflation decreases purchasing power over time This is the cheapest way for the City to issue debt Tax exempt properties do not pay Subject to a debt coverage ratio which is relatively high *Up to 5% can be spent on operations and maintenance directly related to the bond-funded projects per IRS regulations and Utah law further limits this to a one-year period Comparison Table of Sales Tax and GO Bond Questions Last Updated June 7, 2022 Salt Lake City Council Office Bond Projects Summary Document General Obligation (GO) Bond Overview The GO Bond funds will provide Salt Lake City with the opportunity to build on our existing investments to expand and enhance our public lands system in line with the goals of the Reimagine Nature Master Plan and the Mayor’s 2022 Plan. The following projects were selected for funding based on these priorities: 1. Alignment with the Transformative Projects identified in the Reimagine Nature Master Plan and the Mayor’s 2022 Plan 2. Geographic distribution and equity in level of service across the city 3. Community identified priorities through preliminary polling in improving quality of life, specifically air quality, water quality, and access to open space Using these priorities, the following seven projects have been identified for funding in the GO Bond. These projects are listed below in order of Public Lands staff prioritization: 1. Glendale Regional Park 2. Jordan River Corridor Improvements and Activation 3. Allen Park Revitalization and Access 4. Reimagine Neighborhood Parks 5. Fleet Block New Park 6. Liberty Park Playground 7. Folsom Trail Completion and Landscaping All projects listed will require significant public engagement before deciding what work and amenities will be completed. These projects build off existing and planned work by the city. Glendale Regional Park Ask: $27 million Description: The Glendale Regional Park project takes place on the Glendale Water Park site on 1700 S. The site is currently in a master planning process to develop the plan for the final park development. Funding from the bond would substantially build out the vision proposed in the Master Plan. Outcomes: The project is currently funded for Phase One which will complete an active recreation element by spring of 2024, including an all ages playground with accessible design and assistive technologies. The bond funding would substantially complete the build out of the site. The public engagement for the project has informed the design and amenities of highest interest include hiking/biking trails, playgrounds that support play at all levels of ability, water features, a skatepark, food truck infrastructure, basketball and pickleball courts, riverside recreation and access and community gathering space. This project will improve the connectivity and cohesion of the green space in the area, including 17th South Park, Glendale Neighborhood Park, and the Jordan River. Justification: This project is specifically called out in the Master Plan, and it is also supported by the master plan goal to Revive Our River. This project will improve safety and accessibility on the site while also improving air and water quality through increased vegetation. This project is also critical for ensuring that Salt Lake City can continue to provide accessible green spaces as we continue to grow. The 2019 Public Lands Needs assessment called for an additional 94 acres of green space to accommodate expected growth at the current level of service. Current process: Public Lands is currently finalizing the Master Plan document for the site. It is projected for completion and adoption in Fall 2022. Jordan River Corridor Improvements and Activation Ask: $9 million Description: The Jordan River is a key asset in the valley that touches a diversity of communities and provides unique opportunities to recreate. This project will enhance the trail as well as adjacent park spaces. In addition, the Jordan River lands are adjacent to many underserved communities and investment in high quality maintenance and recreation infrastructure can help bring more equitable service to Westside neighborhoods. Outcomes: This project will improve local water and air quality by installing irrigation systems for trees along the Jordan River trail at five key locations. Stormwater outfall and green infrastructure improvements will also be incorporated. This project will also implement improvements to develop consistent and welcoming park spaces along the Jordan River corridor that foster community gathering and highlight the Jordan River as a desirable recreation destination. Specific projects include, nature play areas, pollinator gardens, public art, paddle share program, bike pumptrack and enhanced natural areas at open spaces along the river. All park improvements will include the addition of multilingual signage. Justification: This project is supported by the Master Plan goal Revive Our River and will focus on the strategies listed in the Plan. This project will improve local water and air quality by enhancing the tree canopy and plant biodiversity along the river, while also installing water-wise irrigation systems. Additions of new amenities along the river will improve our distribution of services and accessibility of the river. Current Process: This project builds on the strategies listed in the Master Plan. This work is also supported by the Emerald Ribbon Master Planning Process that will begin in 2022 which will guide future development of the Jordan River Corridor. Allen Park Revitalization and Access Ask: $9 million Description: Allen Park is a recently acquired, 7-acre park located off 1300 E established in 2020. This project would implement a community supported vision and improvements for Allen Park and the preservation of iconic structures and landscapes that exist within the park. This project would improve public park access by restoring historic structures, bridges and the road, and would improve climate resiliency through stream bank, floodplain and landscape restoration. Outcomes: This funding would complete Phase 2 of improvements at Allen Park. The bond would fund stabilization, renovation, and restoration of the main Allen Lodge, to open for public use, preservation of artworks, and stream corridor improvements for air and water quality. Improvements will also include irrigation and native plantings, road repairs and stabilization of other structures as applicable and feasible. Justification: This project is supported by the Master Plan transformative project Sustaining Our Stories. Allen Park is a highly historic and cultural site in need if immediate preservation and rehabilitation to maintain integrity. Waterwise native plantings and trees will improve air quality and lower temperatures of the surrounding urban area. Stream restoration and rehabilitation, as well as removal of potentially hazardous infrastructure can improve stream and environmental quality. Current Process: Public Lands is in the final stages of completion of the Allen Park Cultural Landscape Report. (Anticipated Completion in Fall 2022.) Engagement for the Adaptive Re-use and Management Plan for Allen Park that will guide the future of this unique public park will begin Fall 2022. This project would implement community supported vision and improvements for Allen Park and the preservation of iconic structures and landscapes that exist within the Allen Park. Reimagine Seven Community and Neighborhood Parks Ask: $7 million Description: Neighborhood parks are smaller scale parks located throughout our communities. These parks have a small service area which creates the opportunity for local, targeted revisioning to restore and enhance these parks. This project identifies seven parks, one in each city council district, to undergo a visioning process and make identified improvements. These parks were identified through Public Lands information about the condition and utilization of parks in each district. The proposed parks are: District 1: Madsen Park District 2: Poplar Grove Park District 3: Warm Springs Park District 4: Reservoir Park District 5: Jefferson Park District 6: Donner Trail Park/Rotary Glen Park District 7: Fairmont Park N. Entry/McClelland Trail Outcomes: This funding would replace failing assets, increase elements of placemaking based on community input and desires, and multilingual wayfinding signage. Justification: Reimagine Neighborhood Parks was one of the most important transformative projects identified by the community in the Master Plan. Investing in these parks throughout the city will improve access and activation while also weaving in elements of community identity offering higher- quality park experience for users. Current Process: This funding would kick off district-specific public engagement to determine the specific amenities, improvements and placemaking elements that will be incorporated into each park. Fleet Block New Park Ask: $5 million Description: The Fleet Block is a 10-acre city block owned primarily by the city. The Granary District is a greenspace desert in one of the lowest served areas in the city. This district has less walkable park access than any other planning area, it has the highest population density and is slated to receive the highest levels of residential growth. In 2020, the unused building on Fleet Block became home to murals of individuals lost locally and nationally to police violence which transformed the space into a key memorial and gathering space. There is an opportunity to preserve and enhance the existing memorial space in the next iteration of Fleet Block through the thoughtful design and creation of a park on the block. Outcomes: This funding will support the creation of a new park, play area and pathways in an area of SLC that currently has few places to play. Public art and sport courts have been identified by current public engagement and will be constructed as part of this bond. In addition, the project will add much needed green space which will increase the level of service for the city and this community. Justification: This project is further supported by the Master Plan transformative project Sustaining our Stories. The Central Community Master planning area is one of the city’s highest needs areas with the least access to green space. Integration of a green park space would improve air quality with plantings and trees, reduce temperatures and the effects of urban heat island in the heart of the city, and begin to fulfill the need for access to open space in this area. Further, there has been unanimous desire from the public around the need for significant open space and recreation opportunities on the site. Current Process: A current process is underway from the Mayor’s Office to rezone the Fleet Block for development and create a community vision. Years of community engagement have called for significant open space and recreation opportunities on the Fleet Block. Liberty Park Playground Ask: $2 million Description: The current Liberty Park Rotary Playground is nearing the end of its useful life and will be in need of replacement for the safety of the users. This project will seize the opportunity to re-envision this site to ensure it remains a popular and community-serving asset for decades to come. The future of this site will be rooted heavily in community input and will reflect the desires of users citywide. Outcomes: This funding would fully replace the existing playground and associated amenities for the surrounding area. The new flagship playground would be customized for Liberty Park and state-of-the- art design to honor the popularity and use of the site. Justification: This project is supported by the Master Plan transformative project Coming to a Park Near You. This project will improve safety for users and give Salt Lake City the opportunity to incorporate a unique playground that stands out in the state. Liberty Park is the most utilized park in the city by far and will continue to be a beloved community asset for years to come. Current Process: Community engagement will guide the vision and redevelopment of this play space and will be conducted upon funding to determined specific amenities and playground design. Folsom Trail Completion and Landscaping Ask: $5 million Description: The Folsom Trail is an off-street, paved walking and bicycling path. Significant sections of this trail were completed in 2021, but due to issues with Union Pacific property the section of trail from 1000 W to the Jordan River was not completed. This phase would complete the final phase and fund additional landscaping improvements throughout the corridor. This project will improve east-west connection across the city and will provide easier access to public spaces for those utilizing alternative transportation. In addition, the landscaping and tree plantings of Phase 1 will be drought tolerant, native plants and trees that take into consideration our arid climate to conserve water and improve air quality. Outcomes: Completion of the paved walking/biking path from 1000 West to the Jordan River Parkway (approximately .5 miles), and Phase 1 landscaping along street intersections at 600 W, 800 W, Jeremy, 900 W and 1000 W along the trail. Justification: This project was identified in the Master Plan. The Folsom Trail will provide key walking and biking opportunities. Planting native and drought tolerant species will improve air quality while conserving water. Current Process: Daylighting feasibility and preliminary designs are underway, including cost estimating, and anticipated to be completed by Oct 2022. Daylighting is not included in this project-- anticipated daylighting costs are $15-$20 Million. Revenue Bond Pioneer Park Ask: $10 million Description: The Pioneer Park vision plan identified specific projects for improvements and amenities at Pioneer Park based on robust community engagement. The vision plan was complete in 2021 with over 1000 participants weighing in on the vision. As funding becomes available, phased implementation of the community priorities outlined in the vision plan will be possible. Outcomes: Public Lands currently has just over $3 million for Phase 1 of implementation. The bond funding would allow for expansion of Phase 1 and would make significant progress towards the complete build-out of the vision plan. Potential amenities that were ranked highly among participants of public engagement included a misting water feature, improved dog park, playground and state-of-the- art custom pavilion. This project will increase climate resiliency with native, waterwise plantings, increase access to active recreation and open space through park development, and incorporation of new tree plantings will work towards improving air quality. Justification: The Public Lands Master Plan identifies a need for investment in Pioneer Park to transform it into a vibrant, flagship downtown park. The 2019 adopted Public Lands Needs Assessment found that the downtown and central city neighborhoods have the fastest rate of population growth with the lowest level of park service. In fact, the average level of service throughout the city is 3.5 acres of parkland and 8.6 acres of natural land per 1,000 residents. In the downtown/Central City area, that number is 2.8 acres of parkland and 0.0 acres of natural lands. Pioneer Park is the only community-sized park in downtown Salt Lake City. The acres of parks we do have in this area have a larger weight to carry, with 37,000 employees commuting into the city every day, and should be designed to encourage use and accommodate many different needs. Pioneer Park can meet these needs for green space with investments that will improve activation and combat community dissatisfaction in the park. Current Process: The Pioneer Park Vision Plan has been completed and funding has been secured for Phase 1. Public engagement for the vision plan is complete, and the park is ready for construction document design. Cemetery Roads & Irrigation Ask: $11.2 million Description: The Salt Lake City Cemetery is in need of infrastructure replacement that has been identified both in the Cemetery Master Plan and in the Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan. This project would consist of an irrigation overhaul, including replacement of mainlines, control wiring and valves on the east portion of the Cemetery, and would additionally replace approximately 70% of the failing roads within the Cemetery, equating to approximately 5.4 miles of new road. Outcomes: Completion of these projects would improve access to the Cemetery, as well as climate resilience. Currently, the irrigation at the cemetery is outdated and is not efficient in conserving water and keeping vital vegetation alive during draught. The new irrigation system would allow for more water-conscious watering practices while keeping trees in the nationally accredited arboretum, alive. Additionally, the roads have the potential to pose safety risks into the future as they are failing and in need of repair. Justification: Community engagement was conducted through the Cemetery Master Planning process and has informed these specific priority projects within the Cemetery. Additionally, the Public Lands Master Plan identifies this work as providing a connection between the public and accessible green space. The plan specifically calls for the city to protect the cemetery as an iconic site and invest to promote it as a public, open space asset. Current Process: Cost estimating for these projects has been outlined in the Cemetery Master Plan and has resulted in an $11.2 million request. Public engagement is complete and both projects are ready for construction document design. Urban Wood Reutilization Program Ask: $2 million Description: The Public Lands Urban Wood Reutilization Program will allow the city to begin the process of reusing wood from fallen and removed trees throughout the city, as playground mulch and building materials, etc. to minimize landfill impacts, and provide sustainable reuse of materials and result in cost savings. Outcomes: The completion of this project would include construction of site and storage for the equipment needed to operate a wood reutilization program, which may include a horizontal grinder, sawmill, mini loader, storage and operations structure, fleet awning and forestry yard. Bond funding would not be used for the purchase of operations equipment and separate one-time funding would be needed to complete the project. Ongoing costs include the addition of one FTE and basic office supplies and equipment. Completion of the project would result in cost savings for the city (in hauling and dumping as well as purchase of mulch) and would decrease waste in city landfill and increase the sustainability of our Urban Forestry practices. Justification: This project was specifically identified in the Master Plan. Additionally, with repurposing of wood, reducing trips to the landfill, and repurposing materials in-house, this project will contribute to better air quality and more sustainable operations for Public Lands. Current Process: Public Lands has been investigating this program for several years. The 40 acres adjacent to the Public Lands building has been identified as a preferred location for the Urban Wood Reutilization Program. However, recent development proposals of this property have prompted investigation into alternative sites. If the Urban Wood Reutilization Program is not able to be housed at the Public Lands building, the alternative preferred location would be at the Salt Lake City Modelport (7595 West California Avenue). MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 245 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114 TEL 801-535-6403 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL _________________________ Date Received: __________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ______________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 26, 2022 Daniel Dugan, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer ________________________________ SUBJECT: Salt Lake City Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B and 2022C STAFF CONTACT: Marina Scott, City Treasurer 801-535-6565 DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing RECOMMENDATION: 1) That the City Council hold a discussion in anticipation of adopting a Bond Resolution for the aforementioned bond issue; 2) That the City Council consider adopting a Bond Resolution approving the issuance and sale of up to $65,000,000 principal amount of Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B and 2022C (the “Bonds”), and give authority to certain officers to approve the final terms and provisions of and confirm the sale of the Bonds within certain parameters set forth in the attached Bond Resolution. BUDGET IMPACT: Tax- Exempt Sales Tax and Excise Tax Revenue Bond, Series 2022B – $40,553,000: Proceeds from the Bonds will be used to finance the cost of the various capital improvement projects. The list of the capital improvement projects to be financed by this bond issue is attached. The City’s Bond Counsel has reviewed the attached list of projects and provided their recommendations to the tax status of the bonds. The list is color-coded to reflect their responses. Responses highlighted in green are for projects that are eligible for tax-exempt financing. Responses highlighted in red are projects that either have or are likely to have private business use. Lisa Shaffer (Apr 26, 2022 15:29 MDT)04/26/2022 04/26/2022 Salt Lake City Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2021B and 2021C Transmittal to City Council April 19, 2022 Page 2 of 2 The Administration proposes to issue tax-exempt bonds for the projects highlighted in green for the total of $40,553,000. Based on preliminary estimates and the current interest rate environment, annual debt service costs would average approximately $2.7 million per year for 20 years. Attached are preliminary numbers including estimated sources and uses of funds as well as debt amortization schedules. Taxable Sales Tax and Excise Tax Revenue Bond, Series 2022C - $22,900,000: The Administration proposes to issue taxable bonds for the projects highlighted in red for the total of $22,900,000. Based on preliminary estimates and the current interest rate environment, annual debt service costs would average $1.6 million per year for 20 years. Attached are preliminary numbers including estimated sources and uses of funds as well as debt amortization schedules. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The table below summarizes the proposed bond issue: NEW MONEY New Money Project List $63,453,000 Tax-Exempt (green highlight) $40,553,000 Taxable (red & yellow highlights) $22,900,000 An estimated debt service, a draft copy of the authorizing resolution of the City are included for your review. Please keep in mind that these are preliminary drafts and are subject to change. Attachments cc: Mary Beth Thompson, Boyd Ferguson, Kristin Riker. Recommended Projects (no Prioritization) Proposed Bond Project FY 2023 Proposal Notes Administration Notes 1 Transformer Replacement Project - City & County Building and Library Square 6,100,000.00$ - $3 million increase over original Recommend at $6.1 m. Increase is due to adding emergency generators and refining the design to meet requirements (larger vault). Four possible options being reviewed ranging from $3.2 to $6.15 m. $6.2 is the recommended “50-yr fix” that includes backup generators for all four facilities. Soft cost contingency included. 3 Pioneer Park 10,000,000.00$ - Design to budget approach Recommend $8-10 m. It would be better to do it as one large project versus smaller ones over time. Public engagement is ongoing with concept design nearly complete, $3.4 m is already available, the project will have very significant community impact, a solid concept will be done in early ’22, and it is not Impact Fee eligible 4 Quiet Zones 6,100,000.00$ - Pending Engineering review Recommend $6.1 m. Costs reviewed in early Sept. ‘21 6 Fisher Mansion improvements - Stabilization 1,800,000.00$ - Based on February 2010 structural study Recommend combining with Warm Springs below, project is for structural and envelope stabilization only. Soft cost contingency included. 7 Warm Springs Historic Structure Stabilization (Needs description, wasn't ont the original spreadsheet) 6,000,000.00$ - $600,000 increase over original Recommend combining with Fisher Mansion stabilization for total of $6 m. Measures include protecting the Warm Springs shell, security and fire systems, and seismic improvements to the exterior walls. These improvements are not dependent on the eventual end use. Soft cost contingency included. 8 Urban Wood Reutilization Equipment and Storage Additions 2,000,000.00$ - $300,000 increase over original Recommend at $2 m. Easy project to accomplish with no civic engagement needed and minimal design. Estimate contingency included. Soft cost contingency included. 9 Cemetery Road Repairs 11,200,000.00$ - Based on October 2020 Cemetery Master Plan Recommend $1 m. This investment has the potential to bring in additional outside funds. Has good public support. Easier project to accomplish with more predictable construction costs. This project is also scalable to any investment up to about $14 m. Soft cost contingency included. 10 600 N Corridor Transformation 9,753,000.00$ 600 N Reconstruction 11 Ballpark 3,000,000.00$ 1M-Security & Fencing 1M-Stadium Seating/Stairs Railings 1M Interiors Restrooms & Elevator13Radio Towers 7,500,000.00$ 63,453,000.00$ -$ Preliminary; subject to change. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH $58,935,000 SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2022 B&C (August 10, 2022 ) ($63.454MM New Money, 20-Years Level) Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 08/10/2022 | Delivered 08/10/2022 Series B - Tax- Exempt Series C - Taxable Issue Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $35,870,000.00 $23,065,000.00 $58,935,000.00 Reoffering Premium 4,937,685.00 - 4,937,685.00 Total Sources $40,807,685.00 $23,065,000.00 $63,872,685.00 Uses Of Funds Deposit to Project Construction Fund 40,553,000.00 22,900,000.00 63,453,000.00 Costs of Issuance 152,159.16 97,840.84 250,000.00 Total Underwriter's Discount (0.275%) 98,642.50 63,428.75 162,071.25 Rounding Amount 3,883.34 3,730.41 7,613.75 Total Uses $40,807,685.00 $23,065,000.00 $63,872,685.00 2022BC STR $63.453MM New | Issue Summary | 4/22/2022 | 8:42 AM Stifel Prepared by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (EJR) Page 1 Preliminary; subject to change. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH $35,870,000 SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2022B (August 10, 2022 ) ($40.553MM New Money, 20-Years Level) Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 08/10/2022 - - - - - 10/01/2022 1,600,000.00 5.000% 254,079.17 1,854,079.17 - 04/01/2023 - - 856,750.00 856,750.00 - 06/30/2023 - - - - 2,710,829.17 10/01/2023 1,020,000.00 5.000% 856,750.00 1,876,750.00 - 04/01/2024 - - 831,250.00 831,250.00 - 06/30/2024 - - - - 2,708,000.00 10/01/2024 1,075,000.00 5.000% 831,250.00 1,906,250.00 - 04/01/2025 - - 804,375.00 804,375.00 - 06/30/2025 - - - - 2,710,625.00 10/01/2025 1,130,000.00 5.000% 804,375.00 1,934,375.00 - 04/01/2026 - - 776,125.00 776,125.00 - 06/30/2026 - - - - 2,710,500.00 10/01/2026 1,190,000.00 5.000% 776,125.00 1,966,125.00 - 04/01/2027 - - 746,375.00 746,375.00 - 06/30/2027 - - - - 2,712,500.00 10/01/2027 1,250,000.00 5.000% 746,375.00 1,996,375.00 - 04/01/2028 - - 715,125.00 715,125.00 - 06/30/2028 - - - - 2,711,500.00 10/01/2028 1,315,000.00 5.000% 715,125.00 2,030,125.00 - 04/01/2029 - - 682,250.00 682,250.00 - 06/30/2029 - - - - 2,712,375.00 10/01/2029 1,380,000.00 5.000% 682,250.00 2,062,250.00 - 04/01/2030 - - 647,750.00 647,750.00 - 06/30/2030 - - - - 2,710,000.00 10/01/2030 1,450,000.00 5.000% 647,750.00 2,097,750.00 - 04/01/2031 - - 611,500.00 611,500.00 - 06/30/2031 - - - - 2,709,250.00 10/01/2031 1,525,000.00 5.000% 611,500.00 2,136,500.00 - 04/01/2032 - - 573,375.00 573,375.00 - 06/30/2032 - - - - 2,709,875.00 10/01/2032 1,605,000.00 5.000% 573,375.00 2,178,375.00 - 04/01/2033 - - 533,250.00 533,250.00 - 06/30/2033 - - - - 2,711,625.00 10/01/2033 1,685,000.00 5.000% 533,250.00 2,218,250.00 - 04/01/2034 - - 491,125.00 491,125.00 - 06/30/2034 - - - - 2,709,375.00 10/01/2034 1,770,000.00 5.000% 491,125.00 2,261,125.00 - 04/01/2035 - - 446,875.00 446,875.00 - 06/30/2035 - - - - 2,708,000.00 10/01/2035 1,865,000.00 5.000% 446,875.00 2,311,875.00 - 04/01/2036 - - 400,250.00 400,250.00 - 06/30/2036 - - - - 2,712,125.00 10/01/2036 1,960,000.00 5.000% 400,250.00 2,360,250.00 - 04/01/2037 - - 351,250.00 351,250.00 - 06/30/2037 - - - - 2,711,500.00 10/01/2037 2,060,000.00 5.000% 351,250.00 2,411,250.00 - 04/01/2038 - - 299,750.00 299,750.00 - 06/30/2038 - - - - 2,711,000.00 10/01/2038 2,165,000.00 5.000% 299,750.00 2,464,750.00 - 04/01/2039 - - 245,625.00 245,625.00 - 06/30/2039 - - - - 2,710,375.00 10/01/2039 2,275,000.00 5.000% 245,625.00 2,520,625.00 - 04/01/2040 - - 188,750.00 188,750.00 - 06/30/2040 - - - - 2,709,375.00 10/01/2040 2,390,000.00 5.000% 188,750.00 2,578,750.00 - 04/01/2041 - - 129,000.00 129,000.00 - 06/30/2041 - - - - 2,707,750.00 10/01/2041 2,515,000.00 5.000% 129,000.00 2,644,000.00 - 04/01/2042 - - 66,125.00 66,125.00 - 06/30/2042 - - - - 2,710,125.00 10/01/2042 2,645,000.00 5.000% 66,125.00 2,711,125.00 - 06/30/2043 - - - - 2,711,125.00 Total $35,870,000.00 - $21,047,829.17 $56,917,829.17 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $420,956.58 Average Life 11.736 Years Average Coupon 5.0000000% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 3.8504652% True Interest Cost (TIC) 3.5201156% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 3.0615844% All Inclusive Cost (AIC) 3.5625786% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 3.3177695% Weighted Average Maturity 11.899 Years 2022BC STR $63.453MM New | Series B - Tax-Exempt | 4/22/2022 | 8:42 AM Stifel Prepared by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (EJR) Page 4 Preliminary; subject to change. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH $23,065,000 TAXABLE SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2022C (August 10, 2022 ) ($22.9MM New Money, 20-Years Level) Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 08/10/2022 - - - - - 10/01/2022 1,060,000.00 2.800% 140,087.01 1,200,087.01 - 04/01/2023 - - 479,584.75 479,584.75 - 06/30/2023 - - - - 1,679,671.76 10/01/2023 730,000.00 2.900% 479,584.75 1,209,584.75 - 04/01/2024 - - 468,999.75 468,999.75 - 06/30/2024 - - - - 1,678,584.50 10/01/2024 755,000.00 3.400% 468,999.75 1,223,999.75 - 04/01/2025 - - 456,164.75 456,164.75 - 06/30/2025 - - - - 1,680,164.50 10/01/2025 780,000.00 3.600% 456,164.75 1,236,164.75 - 04/01/2026 - - 442,124.75 442,124.75 - 06/30/2026 - - - - 1,678,289.50 10/01/2026 810,000.00 3.710% 442,124.75 1,252,124.75 - 04/01/2027 - - 427,099.25 427,099.25 - 06/30/2027 - - - - 1,679,224.00 10/01/2027 840,000.00 3.860% 427,099.25 1,267,099.25 - 04/01/2028 - - 410,887.25 410,887.25 - 06/30/2028 - - - - 1,677,986.50 10/01/2028 875,000.00 3.900% 410,887.25 1,285,887.25 - 04/01/2029 - - 393,824.75 393,824.75 - 06/30/2029 - - - - 1,679,712.00 10/01/2029 910,000.00 4.000% 393,824.75 1,303,824.75 - 04/01/2030 - - 375,624.75 375,624.75 - 06/30/2030 - - - - 1,679,449.50 10/01/2030 945,000.00 4.030% 375,624.75 1,320,624.75 - 04/01/2031 - - 356,583.00 356,583.00 - 06/30/2031 - - - - 1,677,207.75 10/01/2031 985,000.00 4.130% 356,583.00 1,341,583.00 - 04/01/2032 - - 336,242.75 336,242.75 - 06/30/2032 - - - - 1,677,825.75 10/01/2032 1,025,000.00 4.230% 336,242.75 1,361,242.75 - 04/01/2033 - - 314,564.00 314,564.00 - 06/30/2033 - - - - 1,675,806.75 10/01/2033 1,075,000.00 4.380% 314,564.00 1,389,564.00 - 04/01/2034 - - 291,021.50 291,021.50 - 06/30/2034 - - - - 1,680,585.50 10/01/2034 1,120,000.00 4.480% 291,021.50 1,411,021.50 - 04/01/2035 - - 265,933.50 265,933.50 - 06/30/2035 - - - - 1,676,955.00 10/01/2035 1,175,000.00 4.580% 265,933.50 1,440,933.50 - 04/01/2036 - - 239,026.00 239,026.00 - 06/30/2036 - - - - 1,679,959.50 10/01/2036 1,230,000.00 4.680% 239,026.00 1,469,026.00 - 04/01/2037 - - 210,244.00 210,244.00 - 06/30/2037 - - - - 1,679,270.00 10/01/2037 1,290,000.00 4.780% 210,244.00 1,500,244.00 - 04/01/2038 - - 179,413.00 179,413.00 - 06/30/2038 - - - - 1,679,657.00 10/01/2038 1,350,000.00 4.810% 179,413.00 1,529,413.00 - 04/01/2039 - - 146,945.50 146,945.50 - 06/30/2039 - - - - 1,676,358.50 10/01/2039 1,420,000.00 4.810% 146,945.50 1,566,945.50 - 04/01/2040 - - 112,794.50 112,794.50 - 06/30/2040 - - - - 1,679,740.00 10/01/2040 1,490,000.00 4.810% 112,794.50 1,602,794.50 - 04/01/2041 - - 76,960.00 76,960.00 - 06/30/2041 - - - - 1,679,754.50 10/01/2041 1,560,000.00 4.810% 76,960.00 1,636,960.00 - 04/01/2042 - - 39,442.00 39,442.00 - 06/30/2042 - - - - 1,676,402.00 10/01/2042 1,640,000.00 4.810% 39,442.00 1,679,442.00 - 06/30/2043 - - - - 1,679,442.00 Total $23,065,000.00 - $12,187,046.51 $35,252,046.51 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $265,692.54 Average Life 11.519 Years Average Coupon 4.5868982% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 4.6107712% True Interest Cost (TIC) 4.5885332% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 4.5558309% All Inclusive Cost (AIC) 4.6392483% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 4.5868982% Weighted Average Maturity 11.519 Years 2022BC STR $63.453MM New | Series C - Taxable | 4/22/2022 | 8:42 AM Stifel Prepared by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (EJR) Page 7 Draft 4/21/22 Delegating Bond Resolution v3 871____/RDB/mo RESOLUTION NO. __ OF 2022 A Resolution authorizing the issuance and the sale of not to exceed $65,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, in one or more series, on a taxable or tax exempt basis, for the purpose of financing _______________; authorizing the execution and delivery of a supplemental trust indenture to secure said bonds; giving authority to certain officials and officers to approve the final terms and provisions of the bonds within the parameters set forth herein; authorizing the taking of all other actions necessary for the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this resolution; and related matters. *** *** *** WHEREAS, Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), is a duly organized and existing city of the first class, operating under the general laws of the State of Utah (the “State”); WHEREAS, the City considers it necessary and desirable and for the benefit of the City to issue its sales and excise tax revenue bonds, in one or more series, on a taxable or tax-exempt basis, as hereinafter provided for the purpose of (a) financing all or a portion of the cost of (i) acquiring, constructing and improving ____________________, as further described in the below defined Supplemental Indenture, and (ii) acquiring, constructing, improving and remodeling various other capital improvement program projects (collectively, the “Project”); (b) funding any necessary reserves and contingencies in connection with the Bonds (defined below) and (c) paying all related costs authorized by law pursuant to authority contained in the the Local Government Bonding Act, Chapter 14 of Title 11 (the “Act”), Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Utah Code”), and other applicable provisions of law; WHEREAS, for the purposes set forth above, the City has determined (a) to issue its Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, in one or more series, on a taxable or tax-exempt basis, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $65,000,000 (the “Series 2022B Bonds”) (subject to the further limitations outlined herein) pursuant to the Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as amended and supplemented to the date hereof (the “Master Indenture”), a copy of which is attached here as Exhibit A and one or more Supplemental Trust Indentures (the “Supplemental Indenture”), between the City and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) (the Master Indenture and the Supplemental Indenture are sometimes collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Indenture”), and (b) to cause the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds to be applied in accordance with the Indenture; WHEREAS, the City is authorized by the Act to finance the Project, to enter into the Supplemental Indenture, and to issue the Bonds to finance all or a portion of the costs of financing the Project, to fund any necessary reserves, and to pay all related costs authorized by law; - 2 - 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution WHEREAS, Section 11-14-316 of the Utah Code provides for the publication of a Notice of Bonds to be Issued (the “Notice of Bonds”) and the running of a 30-day contest period, and the City desires to cause the publication of such Notice of Bonds at this time in compliance with said section with respect to the Bonds; WHEREAS, Section 11-14-318 of the Utah Code requires that a public hearing be held to receive input from the public with respect to the issuance of the Bonds and the potential economic impact that the Project will have on the private sector and that notice of such public hearing be given as provided by law and, in satisfaction of such requirement, the City desires to publish a Notice of Public Hearing and Intent to Issue Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds (the “Notice of Public Hearing”) pursuant to such Section; WHEREAS, Section 11-14-307(7) of the Utah Code requires the City to submit the question of whether or not to issue the Bonds to voters for their approval or rejection if, within 30 calendar days after the publication of the Notice of Public Hearing, a written petition requesting an election and signed by at least 20% of the registered voters in the City is filed with the City; and WHEREAS, in the opinion of the City, it is in the best interests of the City that (a) the Designated Officers (defined below) be authorized to approve the final terms and provisions relating to each series of the Bonds and to execute the Certificate of Determination (defined below) containing such terms and provisions and to accept the offer of the underwriter for each series of the Bonds (the “Underwriter”) for the purchase of one or more series of the Bonds; and (b) the Mayor, the Deputy Mayor or the Mayor’s designee (the “Mayor”), be authorized to execute one or more Official Statements with respect to the Bonds, all as provided herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: Section 1. Issuance of Bonds. (a) For the purposes set forth above, there is hereby authorized and directed the execution, issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds in one or more series, on a taxable or tax-exempt basis and in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $65,000,000. Each series of the Bonds shall be dated as of the date of the initial delivery thereof. The Bonds shall be in authorized denominations, shall be payable, and shall be executed and delivered all as provided in the Indenture. The Bonds shall be subject to redemption prior to maturity as provided in the Indenture. (b) The form of the Bonds set forth in the form Supplemental Indenture, subject to appropriate insertions and revisions in order to comply with the provisions of the Indenture, is hereby approved. (c) The Bonds shall be special obligations of the City, payable from and secured by a pledge and assignment of the Revenues (as defined in the Indenture) received by the City and of certain other moneys held under the Indenture on a parity with any other bonds issued from time to time under the Master Indenture, including but not limited to the City’s outstanding (i) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B, (ii) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B, (iii) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A, (iv) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A, (v) Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax - 3 - 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B, (vi) Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021 and (vii) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022A. The Bonds shall not be obligations of the State or any other political subdivision thereof, other than the City, and neither the faith and credit nor the ad valorem taxing or appropriation power of the State or any political subdivision thereof, including the City, is pledged to the payment of the Bonds. The Bonds shall not constitute general obligations of the City or any other entity or body, municipal, state or otherwise. Section 2. Bond Details; Delegation of Authority. (a) The Bonds shall mature on [October] 1 (or such other dates as specified in the applicable Certificate of Determination (defined below)) of the years and in the principal amounts, and shall bear interest (calculated on the basis of a year of 360 days consisting of twelve 30-day months) from the Closing Date, payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1 (or such other dates as specified in the applicable Certificate of Determination) of each year, and at the rates per annum and commencing on the dates, all as provided in the applicable Certificate of Determination, a form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C, of the Designated Officers (defined below) delivered pursuant to this Section 2, setting forth certain terms and provisions of each series of the Bonds (the “Certificate of Determination”). (b) There is hereby delegated to the Designated Officers, subject to the limitations contained in this resolution, the power to determine and effectuate the following with respect to each series of the Bonds and the Designated Officers are hereby authorized to make such determinations and effectuations: (i) the principal amount of each series of the Bonds necessary to accomplish the purposes of the Bonds set forth in the recitals hereto and the aggregate principal amount of such series Bonds to be executed and delivered pursuant to the Indenture; provided that the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds shall not exceed Sixty-five Million Dollars ($65,000,000); (ii) the maturity date or dates and principal amount of each maturity of each series of the Bonds to be issued; provided, however, that the Bonds mature over a period of not to exceed twenty-one (21) years from their date or dates; (iii) the interest rate or rates of each series of the Bonds, whether such interest was taxable or tax-exempt for federal income tax purposes, and the date on which payment of such interest commences, provided, however, that the interest rate or rates to be borne by any Bond shall not exceed six percent (6.00%) per annum; (iv) the sale of each series of the Bonds and the purchase price to be paid by the applicable Underwriter of such Bonds; provided, however, that the discount from par of each series of the Bonds shall not exceed two percent (2.00%) (expressed as a percentage of the principal amount); (v) the Bonds of each series, if any, to be retired from mandatory sinking fund redemption payments and the dates and the amounts thereof; - 4 - 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution (vi) the time and redemption price, if any, at which a series of the Bonds may be called for redemption prior to their maturity at the option of the City; provided, however, the first optional redemption date shall not be later than ten and a half years from the date of delivery of the applicable series of the Bonds; (vii) the amount of reserves necessary to be maintained in connection with a series of the Bonds, if any; (viii) the use and deposit of the proceeds of each series of the Bonds; and (ix) any other provisions deemed advisable by the Designated Officers not materially in conflict with the provisions of this resolution. For purposes of this resolution and the Bonds, “Designated Officers” means (a) the (i) Mayor of the City; or (ii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Mayor, the Mayor’s Chief of Staff; or (iii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of both the Mayor and the Mayor’s Chief of Staff, the City Treasurer; or (iv) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Mayor, the Mayor’s Chief of Staff and the City Treasurer, the Deputy Treasurer of the City and (b) (i) the Chair of the City Council; or (ii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Chair of the City Council, the Vice Chair of the City Council; or (iii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of both the Chair and Vice Chair of the City Council, any other member of the City Council. Following the sale of each series of the Bonds, the Designated Officers shall obtain such information as they deem necessary to make such determinations as provided above and shall make such determinations as provided above and shall execute a Certificate of Determination containing such terms and provisions of such series of the Bonds, which execution shall be conclusive evidence of the action or determination of the Designated Officers as to the matters stated therein. The provisions of each Certificate of Determination shall be deemed to be incorporated into this Section 2. Section 3. Approval and Execution of the Supplemental Indenture. One or more Supplemental Indentures, in substantially the form of the Fourteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture attached hereto as Exhibit B, are hereby authorized and approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to execute and deliver each Supplemental Indenture on behalf of the City, and the City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to affix to each Supplemental Indenture the seal of the City and to attest such seal and countersign each Supplemental Indenture, with such changes to each Supplemental Indenture from the form attached hereto as are approved by the Mayor, her execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval. The provisions of each Supplemental Indenture, as executed and delivered, are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this resolution. The Master Indenture and each Supplemental Indenture shall constitute a “system of registration” for all purposes of the Registered Public Obligations Act of Utah. Section 4. Final Official Statement. One or more final Official Statements of the City in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement presented at this meeting and in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D, are hereby authorized with such changes, omissions, insertions - 5 - 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution and revisions as the Mayor shall deem advisable, including the completion thereof with the information established at the time of the sale of any series of the Bonds by the Designated Officers and set forth in the applicable Certificate of Determination. The Mayor shall sign and deliver a final Official Statement for distribution to prospective purchasers of each series of the Bonds (or more than one series) and other interested persons. The approval of the Mayor of any such changes, omissions, insertions and revisions shall be conclusively established by the Mayor’s execution of such final Official Statement. Section 5. Preliminary Official Statement to be Deemed Final. The use and distribution of one or more Preliminary Official Statements, in substantially the form presented at this meeting and in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D, are hereby authorized and approved, with such changes, omissions, insertions and revisions as the Mayor and the City Treasurer, or the Deputy Treasurer of the City (the “City Treasurer”), shall deem advisable. The Mayor and the City Treasurer are, and each of them is, hereby authorized to do or perform all such acts and to execute all such certificates, documents and other instruments as may be necessary or advisable to provide for the issuance, sale and delivery of any Bonds and to deem final each Preliminary Official Statement within the meaning and for purposes of paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, subject to completion thereof with the information established at the time of the sale of any Bonds. Section 6. Other Certificates and Documents Required to Evidence Compliance with Federal Tax and Securities Laws. Each of the Mayor, the City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder and the City Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to execute (a) such certificates and documents as are required to evidence compliance with the federal laws relating to the tax- exempt status of interest on any Bonds and (b) a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit E, and such other certificates and documents as shall be necessary to comply with the requirements of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission and other applicable federal securities laws. Section 7. Other Actions With Respect to the Bonds. The officers and employees of the City shall take all action necessary or reasonably required to carry out, give effect to, and consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and shall take all action necessary in conformity with the Act to carry out the issuance of the Bonds, including, without limitation, the execution and delivery of any closing and other documents required to be delivered in connection with the sale and delivery of the Bonds. If (a) the Mayor, (b) the City Recorder or (c) the City Treasurer shall be unavailable or unable to execute or attest and countersign, respectively, the Bonds or the other documents that they are hereby authorized to execute, attest and countersign, the same may be executed, or attested and countersigned, respectively, (i) by the Chief of Staff, (ii) by any Deputy City Recorder or (iii) by the Deputy Treasurer of the City. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the officers and employees of the City are authorized and directed to take such action as shall be necessary and appropriate to issue the Bonds. Section 8. Notice of Bonds to be Issued; Contest Period. In accordance with the provisions of Section 11-14-316 of the Utah Code, the City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder shall cause the Notice of Bonds, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit F, to be - 6 - 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution published one time in The Salt Lake Tribune, a newspaper published and of general circulation within the City. For a period of thirty (30) days from and after publication of the Notice of Bonds, any person in interest shall have the right to contest the legality of this resolution (including the Supplemental Indenture attached hereto) or the Bonds hereby authorized or any provisions made for the security and payment of the Bonds. After such time, no one shall have any cause of action to contest the regularity, formality or legality of this resolution (including the Supplemental Indenture) or the Bonds or any provisions made for the security and payment of the Bonds for any cause. Section 9. Public Hearing. In satisfaction of the requirements of Section 11-14-318 of the Act, a public hearing shall be held by the Council on __________, __________, 2022, during the Council meeting which begins at 7:00 p.m., which, as determined by the Council Chair, shall be held either virtually, at the regular meeting place of the Council in the Council Chambers, Room 315 in the City and County Building, 451 South State Street, in Salt Lake City, Utah, or any combination thereof, to receive input from the public with respect to the issuance by the City of the Bonds and the potential economic impact that the Project will have on the private sector. Section 10. Publication of Notice of Public Hearing. The City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder (the “City Recorder”) shall publish or cause to be published the Notice of Public Hearing on the Utah Public Notice Website, created under Section 63F-1-701 of the Utah Code, no less than 14 days before the public hearing. The Notice of Public Hearing shall be in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit H. Section 11. Form of Petition. The form of the petition to be used by registered voters in requesting that an election be called to authorize the Bonds shall be in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit I. Section 12. Issuance of Bonds After Thirty-Day Period. In accordance with the provisions of Section 11-14-307(7) of the Act, if within thirty days after the publication of the Notice of Public Hearing by posting on the Utah Public Notice Website, a petition or petitions, in the form specified by Section 11 hereof, are filed with the City Recorder, signed by not less than twenty percent (20%) of the registered voters of the City (as certified by the County Clerk of Salt Lake County) requesting that an election be called to authorize the Bonds, then the Council shall proceed to call and hold an election on the Bonds. If such election is held and a majority of the registered voters of the City voting thereon approve the Bonds, then, in accordance with the provisions of the Act, the City shall thereupon be authorized to issue the Bonds. If no petition is filed within the thirty-day period after the date of the final publication of such notice, or if it is determined that the number of signatures on the petitions filed within the thirty-day period after the date of the final publication of such notice is less than the required number, the City shall proceed to issue the Bonds. Section 13. Sale of the Bonds; Purchase Contract. The Bonds authorized to be issued herein are hereby authorized to be sold and delivered to the applicable Underwriter thereof, upon the terms and conditions set forth in the related Purchase Contract. The Mayor is hereby - 7 - 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution authorized, empowered and directed to execute and deliver one or more Purchase Contracts on behalf of the City in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit G, with such changes therein from the form attached hereto as are approved by the Mayor, her execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval. The City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to affix to each Purchase Contract the seal of the City and to attest such seal and countersign each Purchase Contract. Section 14. City Recorder to Perform Certain Acts. The City Recorder is hereby directed to maintain a copy of this Resolution (together with all exhibits hereto), a copy of the Master Indenture and the form of the Supplemental Indenture on file in the City Recorder’s office (or the City Recorder’s temporary office, as applicable) during regular business hours for public examination by registered voters of the City and other interested persons until at least thirty (30) days from and after the date of publication of the Notice of Bonds and upon request to supply copies of the form of petition specified in Section 11 hereof. Section 15. Prior Acts Ratified, Approved and Confirmed. All acts of the officers and employees of the City in connection with the issuance of the Bonds are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed. Section 16. Resolution Irrepealable. Following the execution and delivery of the Supplemental Indenture, this resolution shall be and remain irrepealable until all of the Bonds and the interest thereon shall have been fully paid, cancelled, and discharged. Section 17. Severability. If any section, paragraph, clause, or provision of this resolution shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause, or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this resolution. Section 18. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon its approval and adoption. (Signature page follows.) - 8 - 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2022. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH _______________________________________ Chair Salt Lake City Council ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Recorder [SEAL] APPROVED: By ____________________________________ Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: By ____________________________________ Senior City Attorney A-1 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution EXHIBIT A [ATTACH COPY OF MASTER TRUST INDENTURE] B-1 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution EXHIBIT B [ATTACH FORM OF SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE] C-1 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution EXHIBIT C [ATTACH FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION] D-1 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution EXHIBIT D [ATTACH FORM OF PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT] E-1 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution EXHIBIT E [ATTACH FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT] F-1 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution EXHIBIT F NOTICE OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of Section 11-14-316, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, that on __________, 2022, the City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), adopted a resolution (the “Resolution”) in which it authorized and approved the issuance of its sales and excise tax revenue bonds, in one or more series, on a taxable or tax-exempt basis (the “Bonds”), in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $65,000,000, to bear interest at a rate or rates of not to exceed 6.00% per annum and to mature not later than 21 years from their date or dates and to be sold at a discount from par not to exceed 2.00%. The Bonds shall be subject to such optional and mandatory redemption and other provisions as are contained in the Master Trust Indenture, described below, and the final form of the Bonds and one or more Supplemental Trust Indentures, described below. Pursuant to the Resolution, the Bonds are to be issued for the purpose of paying all or part of the cost of (a) (i) acquiring, constructing and improving __________ and (ii) acquiring, constructing, improving and remodeling various other capital improvement program projects; (b) funding any necessary reserves and contingencies in connection with the Bonds and (c) paying all related costs authorized by law. The Bonds are to be issued and sold by the City pursuant to the Resolution, including as part of the Resolution a draft, in substantially final form, of a Supplemental Trust Indenture (the “Supplemental Indenture”), and a copy of the Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as heretofor amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, a trustee, that were before the Council and attached to the Resolution at the time of the adoption of the Resolution. The City will cause one or more Supplemental Indentures to be executed and delivered in such form and with such changes thereto as certain designated officers of the City shall approve, provided that the principal amount, interest rate or rates, maturity and discount, if any, will not exceed the respective maximums described above. The repayment of the Bonds will be secured by a pledge of the legally available revenues from: (a) Local Sales and Use Taxes received by the City pursuant to Title 59, Chapter 12, Part 2, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.04 of the Salt Lake City Code); (b) Municipal Energy Sales and Use Taxes received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.06 of the Salt Lake City Code); (c) the franchise fees for energy and utilities received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.06 of Salt Lake City Code); (d) the Municipal Telecommunications License Tax revenues received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 4, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.10 of Salt Lake City Code); (e) the franchise fees associated with public utilities received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 17.16.070 of Salt Lake City Code); (f) the franchise fees associated with cable television received by the City pursuant to Salt Lake City Code Chapter 5.20; and and (g) 100% of the sales and use tax revenues received by the City pursuant to Title 59, Chapter 12, Part 4, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended and Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 18 of 2018 (collectively, the “Pledged Taxes”). F-2 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution The City currently has $__________ par amount of bonds or notes currently outstanding that are secured by the Pledged Taxes. More detailed information relating to the City’s outstanding bonds can be found in the City’s most recent Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that is available on the Office of the Utah State Auditor’s website (www.sao.state.ut.us). Assuming a final maturity for the Bonds of approximately __ years from the date hereof and that the Bonds are issued in an aggregate principal amount of $__________ and are held until maturity, based on the City’s currently expected financing structure and interest rates in effect around the time of publication of this notice, the estimated total cost to the City of the proposed Bonds is $__________. A copy of the Resolution (including the draft of the Supplemental Indenture and a copy of the Master Indenture attached to the Resolution) may be examined by appointment at the temporary office of the City Recorder located at [Plaza 349, 349 South 200 East in Salt Lake City, Utah, during regular business hours from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. To schedule an appointment please call (801) 535-7671. Additionally, a protected, pdf copy of the Resolution may be requested by sending an email to the City Recorder at SLCRecorder@slcgov.com.] The Resolution shall be so available for inspection for a period of at least thirty (30) days from and after the date of the publication of this notice. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that pursuant to law for a period of thirty (30) days from and after the date of the publication of this notice, any person in interest shall have the right to contest the legality of the Resolution (including the Supplemental Indenture attached thereto) of the City or the Bonds authorized thereby or any provisions made for the security and payment of the Bonds. After such time, no one shall have any cause of action to contest the regularity, formality or legality of the Resolution, the Bonds or the provisions for their security or payment for any cause. DATED this ____ day of __________, 2022. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH By ____________________________________ City Recorder [SEAL] G-1 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution EXHIBIT G [ATTACH FORM OF PURCHASE CONTRACT] H-1 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution EXHIBIT H SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND INTENT TO ISSUE SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on __________, 2022, the City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), adopted a resolution (the “Resolution”), calling for a public hearing to receive input from the public with respect to the issuance of its sales and excise tax revenue bonds (the “Bonds”) to finance all or a portion of the cost of acquiring, constructing and improving __________ and acquiring, constructing, improving and remodeling various other capital improvement program projects (collectively, the “Project”) and the potential economic impact that the Project will have on the private sector, pursuant to the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”). PURPOSE FOR ISSUING BONDS The City intends to issue the Bonds for the purpose of (1) financing all or a portion of the costs of the Project, (2) funding any necessary reserves and contingencies in connection with the Bonds, and (3) paying the costs incurred in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds. MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE BONDS The City intends to issue the Bonds in one or more series and in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding __________ Dollars ($__________) to finance the Project. The Bonds may be issued with other sales and excise tax revenue bonds being issued for other purposes so the principal amount may exceed the amount listed above to finance the costs of the Project. SALES TAXES PROPOSED TO BE PLEDGED The City proposes to pledge to the payment of the Bonds all of the legally available revenues from: (a) Local Sales and Use Taxes received by the City pursuant to Title 59, Chapter 12, Part 2, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.04 of the Salt Lake City Code); (b) Municipal Energy Sales and Use Taxes received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.06 of the Salt Lake City Code); (c) the franchise fees for energy and utilities received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.06 of Salt Lake City Code); (d) the Municipal Telecommunications License Tax revenues received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 4, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.10 of Salt Lake City Code); (e) the franchise fees associated with public utilities received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 17.16.070 of Salt Lake City Code); (f) the franchise fees associated with cable television received by the City pursuant to Salt Lake City Code Chapter 5.20; and and (g) 100% of the sales and use tax revenues received by the City pursuant to Title 59, Chapter 12, Part 4, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended and Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 18 of 2018. H-2 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution TIME, PLACE AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC HEARING The City will hold a public hearing during its City Council meeting which begins at 7:00 p.m. on __________, 2022. The public hearing will be held either virtually, at the regular meeting place of the Council in the Council Chambers, Room 315 in the City and County Building, 451 South State Street, in Salt Lake City, Utah, or any combination thereof, as determined by the Chair of the City Council. All members of the public are invited to attend and participate in the public hearing in the manner that will be described in the agenda for the meeting. Written comments may be submitted to the City, to the attention of the City Recorder, prior to the public hearing. PURPOSE FOR HEARING The purpose of the hearing is to receive input from the public with respect to the issuance of the Bonds and the potential economic impact that the Project will have on the private sector. NOTICE OF RIGHT TO FILE PETITION TO HOLD AN ELECTION NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that pursuant to Section 11-14-307(7), Utah Code, if within 30 calendar days of the publication of this notice on __________, 2022, by posting on the Utah Public Notice Website, a written petition requesting an election and signed by at least twenty percent (20%) of the registered voters of the City is filed with the City, then the City shall submit the question of whether or not to issue the Bonds to the voters of the City for their approval or rejection. If no written petition is filed or if fewer than 20% of the registered voters of the City sign a written petition, in either case, within 30 calendar days of the posting of this notice on _________, 2022, the City may proceed to issue the Bonds without an election. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH By ____________________________________ City Recorder I-1 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution EXHIBIT I PETITION To: City Recorder Salt Lake City, Utah We, the undersigned citizens and registered voters of Salt Lake City, Utah, respectfully request that an election be called by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, pursuant to the provisions of Section 11-14-307(7), Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, to authorize the issuance by Salt Lake City, Utah, of its sales and excise tax revenue bonds, in a maximum principal amount not exceeding $__________, as to which notice of intention to issue was published on __________, 2022, by posting on the Utah Public Notice Website, pursuant to the provisions of a resolution passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on __________, 2022, and each for himself or herself says: I have personally signed this petition; I am a registered voter of Salt Lake City, Utah; my residence and post office address are correctly written after my name: I-2 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution WARNING It is a felony for any one to sign any initiative or referendum petition with any other name than one’s own, or knowingly to sign one’s name more than once for the same measure, or to sign such petition when one knows that he or she is not a registered voter. REGISTERED VOTER’S PRINTED NAME (MUST BE LEGIBLE TO BE COUNTED) SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED VOTER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE [The following certification shall appear on the reverse side of each page [attached to the Petition containing the signature of voters] I-3 2022B Delegating Bond Resolution STATE OF UTAH ) : ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, _________________________, of _____________________, hereby certify that I am a registered voter of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, that all the names which appear on this sheet were signed by persons who professed to be the persons whose names appear thereon, and each of them signed his or her name thereto in my presence, I believe that each has printed and signed his or her name, and written his or her post office address and residence correctly, and that each signer is a registered voter of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Subscribed and sworn to before me this _____ day of __________, 2022. Notary Public (or other official title) Draft 4/4/22 Fourteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture v2[1] 871____/RDB/mo FOURTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH AND ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE DATED AS OF __________ 1, 2022 $__________ FEDERALLY TAXABLE SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2022B - i - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND AUTHORITY ......................................................................2 Section 101. Definitions..............................................................................................2 Section 102. Authority for Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture .................................4 ARTICLE II AUTHORIZATION, TERMS AND ISSUANCE OF SERIES 2022B BONDS ..........................................................................................................4 Section 201. Authorization of Series 2022B Bonds, Principal Amount, Designation and Series ...........................................................................4 Section 202. Finding and Purpose ..............................................................................4 Section 203. Issue Date ...............................................................................................5 Section 204. Series 2022B Bonds ...............................................................................5 Section 205. Registered Bonds; Denomination and Numbers ....................................6 Section 206. Paying Agent ..........................................................................................6 Section 207. Optional Redemption and Redemption Price ........................................6 Section 208. Execution and Authentication of Series 2022B Bonds ..........................7 Section 209. Delivery of Series 2022B Bonds............................................................8 Section 210. Book-Entry System ................................................................................8 Section 211. Representation Letter .............................................................................9 Section 212. Partial Payment of Series 2022B Bonds Held by DTC .........................9 Section 213. Payments to Cede .................................................................................10 ARTICLE III ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCOUNTS AND APPLICATION OF SERIES 2022B BOND PROCEEDS .............................................................................10 Section 301. Series 2022B Bond Service Subaccount ..............................................10 Section 302. Series 2022B Debt Service Reserve Subaccount .................................10 Section 303. Series 2022B Debt Service Reserve Requirement ...............................10 Section 304. Series 2022B Project Account .............................................................10 Section 305. Application of Proceeds of Series 2022B Bonds .................................10 ARTICLE IV FORM OF SERIES 2022B BONDS ..................................................................11 Section 401. Form of Series 2022B Bonds ...............................................................11 ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS ........................................................................................11 Section 501. System of Registration .........................................................................11 Section 502. Authorized Officer ...............................................................................11 Section 503. Notice to Rating Agencies. ..................................................................11 Section 504. Limitation of Duties of Trustee............................................................11 Section 505. Article and Section Headings...............................................................11 Section 506. Amendments to this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture ....................12 Section 507. Partial Invalidity...................................................................................12 SECTION PAGE - ii - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture Section 508. Representation Regarding Ethical Standards for City Officers and Employees and Former City Officers and Employees ............................................................................................12 SIGNATURE PAGE ............................................................................................................................13 EXHIBIT A — FORM OF BOND EXHIBIT B — CURRENTLY ANTICIPATED SERIES 2022B PROJECTS Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture THIS FOURTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE (the “Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture”), dated as of __________ 1, 2022, between Salt Lake City, Utah, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Utah (the “City”), and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, a national banking association duly organized and qualified under the laws of the United States of America, authorized by law to accept and execute trusts and having an office in Salt Lake City, Utah (the “Trustee”): W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the City has entered into a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as amended and supplemented to the date hereof (the “Master Indenture” and, together with the Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, the “Indenture”), with the Trustee; WHEREAS, the City considers it necessary and desirable and for the benefit of the City and its residents to issue sales and excise tax revenue bonds pursuant to the Indenture and as hereinafter provided for the purpose of (a) financing all or a portion of the cost of (i) acquiring, constructing and improving _______________________, as further described in Exhibit B hereto, and (ii) acquiring, constructing, improving and remodeling various other capital improvement program projects; (b) funding any necessary reserves and contingencies in connection with the Series 2022B Bonds (defined below) and (c) paying all related costs authorized by law pursuant to authority contained in the the Local Government Bonding Act, Chapter 14 of Title 11, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended; WHEREAS, the the $__________ Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B (the “Series 2022B Bonds”) will be authorized, issued and secured under the Indenture on a parity with all other Bonds (as defined in the Indenture) issued and outstanding from time to time thereunder; and WHEREAS, the execution and delivery of the Series 2022B Bonds and of this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture have in all respects been duly authorized and all things necessary to make the Series 2022B Bonds, when executed by the City and authenticated by the Trustee, the valid and binding legal obligations of the City and to make this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture a valid and binding agreement have been done; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS FOURTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE WITNESSETH: The terms and conditions upon which the Series 2022B Bonds are to be executed, authenticated, delivered, secured and accepted by all persons who from time to time shall be or become Registered Owners thereof are as follows: - 2 - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND AUTHORITY Section 101. Definitions. (a) Except as provided in Section 101(b), all defined terms contained in the Master Indenture shall have the same meanings when used in this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture as set forth in the Master Indenture. (b) As used in this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context otherwise requires: “Beneficial Owner” means, when the Series 2022B Bonds are registered in the Book-Entry System, any person who acquires a beneficial ownership interest in a Series 2022B Bond held by the Securities Depository. “Bond Counsel” means Chapman and Cutler LLP, or other counsel of nationally recognized standing in matters pertaining to the tax-exempt status of interest on obligations issued by states and their political subdivisions, duly admitted to the practice of law before the highest court of any state of the United States. “Book-Entry System” means the system maintained by the Securities Depository and described in Section 210. “Cede” means Cede & Co., the nominee of DTC, and any successor nominee of DTC with respect to the Series 2022B Bonds pursuant to Section 210 hereof. “Closing Date” means __________, 2022. “DTC” means The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its successors and assigns. “Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture” means this Fourteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of __________ 1, 2022, between the City and the Trustee. “Indenture” means the Master Indenture as amended and supplemented by this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture and as from time to time hereafter amended and supplemented by Supplemental Indentures. “Issue Date” means the date of initial authentication and delivery of the Series 2022B Bonds, as designated in Section 203 hereof. “Master Indenture” means the Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as amended and supplemented to the date hereof, between the City and the Trustee. - 3 - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture “Opinion of Bond Counsel” means an opinion of Bond Counsel experienced in matters relating to the tax exemption of interest on obligations issued by states and their political subdivisions. “Participants” means those broker-dealers, banks and other financial institutions from time to time for which DTC holds Series 2022B Bonds as securities depository. “Person” means natural persons, firms, partnerships, associations, corporations, trusts, public bodies and other entities. “Principal Corporate Trust Office” means, with respect to the Trustee, the office of the Trustee at One South Main Street, Suite 1200, Salt Lake City, Utah 84133-1109, Attention: Corporate Trust Department, or such different or additional offices as may be specified in writing by the Trustee to the City and the Holders of Series 2022B Bonds. “Purchase Contract” means the Purchase Contract between the City and the Underwriter, pursuant to which the Series 2022B Bonds are to be sold by the City to the Underwriter. “Record Date” means the fifteenth day of the month next preceding any interest payment date. “Representation Letter” means the Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations, dated October 16, 2019, between the City and DTC relating to a book-entry system for bonds and other obligations of the City. “Securities Depository” means DTC or its nominee, and its successors and assigns. “Series 2022B Bonds” means the City’s Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B, authorized by this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture. “Series 2022B Bond Service Subaccount” means the Series Subaccount for the Series 2022B Bonds in the Bond Service Account established pursuant to Section 301 hereof. “Series 2022B Debt Service Reserve Requirement” means the amount, if any, required to be deposited in the Series 2022B Debt Service Reserve Subaccount pursuant to Section 303 of this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture. “Series 2022B Debt Service Reserve Subaccount” means the Series Subaccount for the Series 2022B Bonds in the Debt Service Reserve Account established in Section 302 hereof. “Series 2022B Project” means, collectively, (i) the acquisition, construction and improvement of ____________________, as further described in Exhibit B hereto, and (ii) the acquisition, construction, improvement and remodeling of various other capital improvement program projects. - 4 - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture “Series 2022B Project Account” means the Project Account in the Construction Fund established pursuant to Section 304 hereof. [“Series 2022B Term Bonds” means the Series 2022B Bonds maturing on [October] 1, 20__.] “State” means the State of Utah. “Trustee” means Zions Bancorporation, National Association, in Salt Lake City, Utah, and its successors and permitted assigns under the Indenture. “Underwriter” means _________________________________. The terms “hereby,” “hereof,” “hereto,” “herein,” “hereunder,” and any similar terms as used in this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, refer to this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture. (c) Except as otherwise specified, each reference herein (i) to a time of day is to the time on such day in New York, New York, and (ii) to a Section is to the referenced Section hereof. Section 102. Authority for Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture. This Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture is adopted pursuant to the provisions of the Act and the Indenture. ARTICLE II AUTHORIZATION, TERMS AND ISSUANCE OF SERIES 2022B BONDS Section 201. Authorization of Series 2022B Bonds, Principal Amount, Designation and Series. In order to provide funds for the acquisition, construction, improvement and remodeling of the Series 2022B Project and in accordance with and subject to the terms, conditions and limitations established in the Indenture, including this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, a Series of Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, designated “Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B,” is hereby authorized to be issued in the aggregate Principal amount of $__________ Section 202. Finding and Purpose. (a) The City hereby finds, determines and declares that: (i) The requirements of Sections 2.02 and 2.03 of the Indenture will have been complied with upon the delivery of the Series 2022B Bonds. (ii) With the exception of the City’s (i) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B, originally issued in the aggregate Principal amount of $7,315,000; (ii) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B, originally issued in the aggregate Principal amount of $10,935,000; (iii) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A, originally issued in the aggregate Principal amount of $21,715,000; (iv) Sales and - 5 - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A, originally issued in the aggregate Principal amount of $2,620,000; (v) Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B, originally issued in the aggregate Principal amount of $58,540,000; (vi) Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021, originally issued in the aggregate principal amount of $15,045,000 and (vii) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022A, originally issued in the aggregate principal amount of $8,900,000, after the issuance of the Series 2022B Bonds, as provided herein, (A) the City will have no other bonds, notes or other obligations outstanding pursuant to the Indenture, and (B) there will be no other outstanding bonds, notes or other obligations payable from and secured by a parity pledge of Revenues. (b) The Series 2022B Bonds are hereby authorized to be issued pursuant to Sections 2.02 and 2.03 of the Indenture for the purposes of providing an amount that will be sufficient to provide for the payment of a portion of the Cost of Construction of the Series 2022B Project. Section 203. Issue Date. The Series 2022B Bonds shall be dated as of the date of delivery thereof. Section 204. Series 2022B Bonds. (a) The Series 2022B Bonds shall mature on the dates and in the principal amounts and shall bear interest from the date of delivery thereof, payable semi- annually thereafter on April 1 and October 1 in each year, beginning __________ 1, 202_, at the rates shown below: MATURITY ([OCTOBER] 1) PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE $ % (b) Each Series 2022B Bond shall bear interest from the interest payment date next preceding the date of registration and authentication thereof unless it is registered as of an interest payment date, in which event it shall bear interest from the date thereof, or unless it is registered prior to the first interest payment date, in which event it shall bear interest from its date, or unless, as shown by the records of the Trustee, interest on the Series 2022B Bonds shall be in default, in which event it shall bear interest from the date to which interest has been paid in full. - 6 - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture Section 205. Registered Bonds; Denomination and Numbers. The Series 2022B Bonds shall be issued solely as fully-registered Bonds, without coupons, in the denomination of $5,000 or any whole multiple thereof; provided that no individual Series 2022B Bond shall represent more than one maturity of Series 2022B Bonds. Each of the Series 2022B Bonds shall be numbered from one (1) consecutively upwards with the prefix “R” preceding each number. Section 206. Paying Agent. Zions Bancorporation, National Association, as Trustee, is hereby appointed the Paying Agent for the Series 2022B Bonds, pursuant and subject to Section 7.02 of the Indenture. Principal of and Redemption Price on the Series 2022B Bonds when due shall be payable at the principal corporate trust operations office of the Trustee, or of its successor as Paying Agent. Payment of interest on the Series 2022B Bonds shall be made to the registered owner thereof and shall be paid by check or draft mailed on the payment date to the person who is the registered owner of record as of the close of business on the Record Date at his or her address as it appears on the registration books of the Trustee or at such other address as is furnished in writing by such registered owner to the Trustee prior to the Record Date. In the written acceptance of each Paying Agent referred to in Section 7.02 of the Indenture, such Paying Agent shall agree to take all action necessary for all representations of the City in the Letter of Representations with respect to the Paying Agent to at all times be complied with. Section 207. Optional Redemption and Redemption Price. (a) The Series 2022B Bonds maturing on or after [October] 1, 203_, are subject to redemption, in whole or in part, at the election of the City, on any date on or after __________ 1, 203_ (if in part, such Series 2022B Bonds to be redeemed shall be selected from such maturities as shall be determined by the City in its discretion and within each maturity as selected by the Trustee), upon notice as provided in Section 4.03 of the Indenture, and at a Redemption Price equal to the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the redemption date. (b) The Series 2022B Term Bonds are subject to redemption in part by operation of Sinking Fund Installments as provided in the Indenture, upon notice as provided in Section 4.03 of the Indenture, at a redemption price equal to the Principal amount of the Series 2022B Term Bonds or portion thereof to be redeemed, together with accrued interest to the date of redemption. The amounts and due dates of the Sinking Fund Installments for the Series 2022B Term Bonds are set forth in the following table: [OCTOBER] 1 OF THE YEAR MANDATORY REDEMPTION AMOUNT $ * ___________________ * Stated Maturity In determining the amount of any Sinking Fund Installment due on any date specified above, there shall be deducted the principal amount of any Series 2022B Term Bonds which have been - 7 - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture redeemed or purchased on a date not less than 30 days preceding the date on which such Sinking Fund Installment is due from moneys accumulated in the Bond Service Account with respect to such Sinking Fund Installment. Upon any purchase or redemption of the Series 2022B Term Bonds, there will be credited toward the Sinking Fund Installments thereafter to become due such amount as may be designated by the City in a Written Request delivered to the Trustee. (c) With respect to any notice of optional redemption of Series 2022B Bonds, unless upon the giving of such notice such Series 2022B Bonds shall be deemed to have been paid within the meaning of Article XI of the Indenture, such notice may state that such redemption shall be conditioned upon the receipt by the Trustee on or prior to the date fixed for such redemption of money sufficient to pay the Redemption Price of and interest on the Series 2022B Bonds to be redeemed, and that if such money shall not have been so received said notice shall be of no force and effect, and the City shall not be required to redeem such Series 2022B Bonds. In the event that such notice of redemption contains such a condition and such money is not so received, the redemption shall not be made and the Trustee shall within a reasonable time thereafter give notice, in the manner in which the notice of redemption was given, that such money was not so received and that such redemption was not made. (d) In addition to the notice described in Section 4.03 of the Indenture, further notice of any redemption of the Series 2022B Bonds shall be given by the Trustee as set out below, but no defect in such further notice nor any failure to give all or any portion of such further notice shall in any manner defeat the effectiveness of a call for redemption if notice thereof is given as described in Section 4.03 of the Indenture. (i) Each further notice of redemption given hereunder shall contain (A) the CUSIP numbers of all Series 2022B Bonds being redeemed; (B) the date of issue of the Series 2022B Bonds as originally issued; (C) the rate of interest borne by each Series 2022B Bond being redeemed; (D) the maturity date of each Series 2022B Bond being redeemed; and (E) any other descriptive information needed to identify accurately the Series 2022B Bonds being redeemed. (ii) Each further notice of redemption shall be posted on the Electronic Municipal Market Access System (or any successor thereto) and sent at least 35 days before the redemption date by registered or certified mail or overnight delivery service to DTC and to all other registered Securities Depositories then in the business of holding substantial amounts of obligations of types comprising the Series 2022B Bonds designated to the Trustee by the City, to the Rating Agencies and to any other nationally recognized information services as designated by the City to the Trustee. (iii) Each check or other transfer of funds issued for the payment of the redemption price of the Series 2022B Bonds being redeemed shall bear the CUSIP number identifying, by issue and maturity, the Series 2022B Bonds being redeemed with the proceeds of such check or other transfer. Section 208. Execution and Authentication of Series 2022B Bonds. Each of the Series 2022B Bonds shall be executed on behalf of the City by the Mayor by manual or facsimile - 8 - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture signature, and attested and countersigned by the City Recorder or, if the City Recorder shall be unavailable or unable to attest and countersign the Series 2022B Bonds, any Deputy City Recorder by manual or facsimile signature, and the City’s seal shall be affixed to, or a facsimile thereof shall be imprinted upon, the Series 2022B Bonds. The Series 2022B Bonds shall then be delivered to the Trustee (or any Transfer Agent appointed pursuant to Section 7.10 of the Indenture) and manually authenticated by it. Section 209. Delivery of Series 2022B Bonds. The Series 2022B Bonds shall be delivered to the Underwriter, upon compliance with the provisions of Section 3.02 of the Indenture, at such time and place as provided in, and subject to, the provisions of the Purchase Contract. Section 210. Book-Entry System. The Series 2022B Bonds shall be initially issued in the name of Cede, as nominee for DTC as the initial Securities Depository and registered owner of the Series 2022B Bonds, and held in the custody of the Securities Depository. A single certificate will be issued and delivered to the Securities Depository for each maturity of the Series 2022B Bonds, and the Beneficial Owners will not receive physical delivery of Series 2022B Bond certificates except as provided herein. For so long as the Securities Depository shall continue to serve as securities depository for the Series 2022B Bonds as provided herein, all transfers of beneficial ownership interests will be made by book-entry only, and no investor or other party purchasing, selling or otherwise transferring beneficial ownership of Series 2022B Bonds is to receive, hold or deliver any Series 2022B Bond certificate. At the direction of the City, with notice to the Trustee, but without the consent of the Series 2022B Bondholders and the Trustee, the City may appoint a successor Securities Depository and enter into an agreement with the successor Securities Depository to establish procedures with respect to a Book-Entry System for the Series 2022B Bonds not inconsistent with the provisions of the Indenture. Any successor Securities Depository shall be a “clearing agency” registered under Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The City and the Trustee may rely conclusively upon (a) a certificate of the Securities Depository as to the identity of the Participants in the Book-Entry System with respect to the Series 2022B Bonds and (b) a certificate of any such Participant as to the identity of and the respective Principal amount of the Series 2022B Bonds beneficially owned by the Beneficial Owners. Whenever, during the term of the Series 2022B Bonds, the beneficial ownership thereof is determined by a book-entry at the Securities Depository, the requirements in the Indenture of holding, delivering or transferring such Series 2022B Bonds shall be deemed modified to require the appropriate person to meet the requirements of the Securities Depository as to registering or transferring the book-entry to produce the same effect. Any provision hereof permitting or requiring delivery of the Series 2022B Bonds shall, while such Series 2022B Bonds are in the Book-Entry System, be satisfied by the notation on the books of the Securities Depository in accordance with applicable state law. Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Indenture and the Series 2022B Bonds with respect to the rights of Participants and Beneficial Owners, when a Book-Entry System is in effect, the City and the Trustee may treat the Securities Depository (or its nominee) as the sole and - 9 - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture exclusive owner of the Series 2022B Bonds registered in its name for the purposes of payment of the Principal or purchase price of and interest on such Series 2022B Bonds or portion thereof to be redeemed or purchased, of giving any notice permitted or required to be given to the Series 2022B Bondholders under the Indenture and of voting, and none of the City and the Trustee shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. None of the City or the Trustee will have any responsibility or obligations to the Securities Depository, any Participant, any Beneficial Owner or any other person which is not shown on the bond register, with respect to (i) the accuracy of any records maintained by the Securities Depository or any Participant; (ii) the payment by the Securities Depository or by any Participant of any amount due to any Beneficial Owner in respect of the Principal amount or redemption or purchase price of, or interest on, any Series 2022B Bonds; (iii) the delivery of any notice by the Securities Depository or any Participant; (iv) the selection of the Beneficial Owners to receive payment in the event of any partial redemption of any of the Series 2022B Bonds; or (v) any other action taken by the Securities Depository or any Participant. The Trustee shall pay all Principal or purchase price of and interest on the Series 2022B Bonds registered in the name of Cede only to or “upon the order of” the Securities Depository (as that term is used in the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in Utah and New York), and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City’s obligations with respect to the Principal or purchase price of and interest on such Series 2022B Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. The Book-Entry System may be discontinued for the Series 2022B Bonds by the Trustee and the City, at the direction and expense of the City, and the City and the Trustee will cause the delivery of Series 2022B Bond certificates to such Beneficial Owners of the Series 2022B Bonds and registered in the names of such Beneficial Owners as shall be specified to the Trustee by the Securities Depository in writing, under the following circumstances: (A) The Securities Depository determines to discontinue providing its service with respect to the Series 2022B Bonds and no successor Securities Depository is appointed as described above. Such a determination may be made at any time by giving 30 days’ notice to the City and the Trustee and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. (B) The City determines not to continue the Book-Entry System through a Securities Depository for the Series 2022B Bonds. When the Book-Entry System is not in effect, all references herein to the Securities Depository shall be of no further force or effect. Section 211. Representation Letter. The City’s execution and delivery of the Representation Letter shall not in any way limit the provisions of Section 210 hereof or in any other way impose upon the City any obligation whatsoever with respect to persons having interests in the Series 2022B Bonds other than the Holders thereof. Section 212. Partial Payment of Series 2022B Bonds Held by DTC. In the event of a redemption or any other similar transaction necessitating a reduction in aggregate Principal amount of any of the Series 2022B Bonds outstanding, DTC in its discretion: (a) may request the Trustee - 10 - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture to issue and authenticate a new Series 2022B Bond certificate, or (b) shall make an appropriate notation on the Series 2022B Bond certificate indicating the date and amounts of such reduction in Principal, except in the case of final maturity in which case the certificate must be presented to the Trustee prior to payment. Section 213. Payments to Cede. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture to the contrary, so long as any Series 2022B Bond is registered in the name of Cede, as nominee of DTC, all payments with respect to Principal of and interest on such Series 2022B Bond and all notices with respect to such Series 2022B Bond shall be made and given, respectively, in the manner provided in the Representation Letter. ARTICLE III ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCOUNTS AND APPLICATION OF SERIES 2022B BOND PROCEEDS Section 301. Series 2022B Bond Service Subaccount. Pursuant to Section 5.07(a) of the Indenture, there is hereby established a subaccount in the Bond Service Account in the Principal and Interest Fund designated as the “Series 2022B Bond Service Subaccount.” Moneys shall be deposited into and paid from the Series 2022B Bond Service Subaccount in accordance with Section 5.07 of the Indenture to pay the Principal of and interest on the Series 2022B Bonds. Section 302. Series 2022B Debt Service Reserve Subaccount. In satisfaction of the requirement of Section 5.08(a) of the Indenture, there is hereby established a separate Series Subaccount in the Debt Service Reserve Account in the Principal and Interest Fund designated as the “Series 2022B Debt Service Reserve Subaccount.” Section 303. Series 2022B Debt Service Reserve Requirement. The Series 2022B Debt Service Reserve Requirement will be $-0-. Section 304. Series 2022B Project Account. There is hereby established a Project Account in the Construction Fund designated as the “Series 2022B Project Account.” Moneys in the Series 2022B Project Account shall be used for the purposes and as authorized by Section 5.04 of the Indenture to pay the Costs of Construction of the Series 2022B Project. Section 305. Application of Proceeds of Series 2022B Bonds. From the proceeds of the Series 2022B Bonds there shall be paid to or on behalf of the Trustee for deposit as follows: (i) $-0- into the Series 2022B Bond Service Subaccount; (ii) $-0- into the Series 2022B Debt Service Reserve Subaccount; (iv) the balance of the proceeds of the sale of the Series 2022B Bonds shall be deposited into the Series 2022B Project Account. - 11 - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture ARTICLE IV FORM OF SERIES 2022B BONDS Section 401. Form of Series 2022B Bonds. Subject to the provisions of the Indenture, each Series 2022B Bond shall be in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, with such insertions or variations as to any redemption or amortization provisions and such other insertions or omissions, endorsements and variations as may be required or permitted by the Indenture. ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS Section 501. System of Registration. The Indenture shall constitute a system of registration within the meaning and for all purposes of the Registered Public Obligations Act, Chapter 7 of Title 15, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended. Section 502. Authorized Officer. The Mayor, the Chief of Staff, the City Recorder, any Deputy City Recorder, the City Treasurer, the Deputy Treasurer of the City, or other officers of the City are each hereby designated as an “Authorized Officer” as that term is defined in Section 1.01 of the Indenture. Section 503. Notice to Rating Agencies. The Trustee will promptly notify in writing each Rating Agency then rating the Series 2022B Bonds of the following events: (a) the redemption, purchase, payment, acceleration of maturity or defeasance of Outstanding Series 2022B Bonds; (b) amendments to the Indenture (including this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture) of which the Trustee has notice; and (c) a change in the Trustee. Notices shall be mailed by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to such address as the Trustee has been advised in writing by the City or such Rating Agency is appropriate for sending such notices. Section 504. Limitation on Duties of Trustee. The Trustee shall not be required to expend, advance, or risk its own funds or incur any financial liability in the performance of its duties or in the exercise of any of its rights or powers if it shall have reasonable grounds for believing that repayment of such funds or satisfactory indemnity against such risk or liability is not assured to it. Section 505. Article and Section Headings. The headings or titles of the several articles and sections hereof, and any table of contents appended to copies hereof, shall be solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the meaning, construction or effect of this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture. - 12 - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture Section 506. Amendments to this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture. This Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture may be amended without the consent of the Holders of the Series 2022B Bonds to make any change necessary to evidence or give effect to, or to facilitate, provide for or authorize the delivery and administration under this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture of any Security Instrument. Section 507. Partial Invalidity. If any one or more of the covenants or agreements, or portions thereof, provided in this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture to be performed shall be contrary to law (other than Section 12.01 of the Indenture and any other provisions of the Indenture and the Series 2022B Bonds limiting the liability of the City to make payments on such Series 2022B Bonds solely from Revenues and other amounts pledged therefore by the Indenture), then such covenant or covenants, such agreement or agreements, or such portions thereof, shall be null and void and shall be deemed separable from the remaining covenants and agreements or portions thereof and shall in no way affect the validity of this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture or of the Series 2022B Bonds; but the Holders of the Series 2022B Bonds shall retain all the rights and benefits accorded to them under the Act or any other applicable provisions of law. Section 508. Representation Regarding Ethical Standards for City Officers and Employees and Former City Officers and Employees. The Trustee represents that it has not: (a) provided an illegal gift or payoff to a City officer or employee or former City officer or employee, or his or her relative or business entity; (b) retained any person to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, or brokerage or contingent fee, other than bona fide employees or bona fide commercial selling agencies for the purpose of securing business; (c) knowingly breached any of the ethical standards set forth in the City’s conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code; or (d) knowingly influenced, and hereby promises that it will not knowingly influence, a City officer or employee or former City officer or employee to breach any of the ethical standards set forth in the City’s conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code. (Signature page follows.) - 13 - Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture to be executed by the Mayor and attested and countersigned by the City Recorder, and its official seal to be hereunto affixed and attested by the City Recorder, and to evidence its acceptance of the trusts hereby created, Zions Bancorporation, National Association has caused this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture to be executed by its Trust Officer, all as of the date hereof. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH By ____________________________________ Mayor ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: By __________________________________ City Recorder [SEAL] APPROVED AS TO FORM: By ____________________________________ Senior City Attorney ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee By ____________________________________ Trust Officer A-1 Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture EXHIBIT A [FORM OF BOND] Unless this certificate is presented by an authorized representative of The Depository Trust Company, a New York corporation (“DTC”), to the City or its agent for registration of transfer, exchange, or payment, and any certificate issued is registered in the name of Cede & Co. or in such other name as is requested by an authorized representative of DTC (and any payment is made to Cede & Co. or to such other entity as is requested by an authorized representative of DTC), ANY TRANSFER, PLEDGE, OR OTHER USE HEREOF FOR VALUE OR OTHERWISE BY OR TO ANY PERSON IS WRONGFUL inasmuch as the registered owner hereof, Cede & Co., has an interest herein. _________________________ REGISTERED REGISTERED No. R-_____ $________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF SALT LAKE SALT LAKE CITY FEDERALLY TAXABLE SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BOND, SERIES 2022B INTEREST RATE MATURITY DATE DATED DATE CUSIP _____% [October] 1, _____ __________, 2022 _______ REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: ------------------------------------- DOLLARS ------------------------------------------ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), a duly organized and existing municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Utah, located in Salt Lake County, Utah, acknowledges itself indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay, in the manner and from the source hereinafter provided, to the registered owner identified above, or registered assigns, on the maturity date identified above, unless this Bond shall have been called for redemption and payment of the redemption price shall have been duly made or provided for, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal amount identified above, and to pay, in the manner and from the source hereinafter provided, to the registered owner hereof interest on the balance of said principal amount from time to time remaining unpaid from the interest payment date next preceding the date of registration and authentication of this Bond, unless this Bond is registered and authenticated as of an interest payment date, in which event this Bond shall bear interest from such interest payment date, or unless this Bond is registered and authenticated prior to the first interest payment date, in which event this Bond shall bear interest A-2 Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture from the dated date specified above, or unless, as shown by the records of the hereinafter referred to Trustee, interest on the hereinafter referred to Series 2022B Bonds shall be in default, in which event this Bond shall bear interest from the date to which interest has been paid in full, at the rate per annum specified above (calculated on the basis of a year of 360 days comprised of twelve 30- day months), payable in each year on April 1 and October 1, beginning _________ 1, 202_, until payment in full of such principal amount, except as the provisions hereinafter set forth with respect to redemption prior to maturity may become applicable hereto. This Bond, as to principal and redemption price when due, will be payable at the principal corporate trust operations office of Zions Bancorporation, National Association, of Salt Lake City, Utah, as paying agent of the City, or its successor as such paying agent, in any coin or currency of the United States of America which at the time of payment is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts; provided, however, that payment of the interest hereon shall be made to the registered owner hereof and shall be paid by check or draft mailed to the person who is the registered owner of record as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the month next preceding each interest payment date (the “Record Date”) at his or her address as it appears on the registration books of the Trustee (as defined below) or at such other address as is furnished in writing by such registered owner to the Trustee prior to the Record Date. THE CITY IS OBLIGATED TO PAY PRINCIPAL OF, REDEMPTION PRICE OF, AND INTEREST ON THIS BOND SOLELY FROM THE REVENUES AND OTHER FUNDS OF THE CITY PLEDGED THEREFOR UNDER THE TERMS OF THE INDENTURE (AS DEFINED BELOW). THIS BOND IS NOT A DEBT OF THE CITY WITHIN THE MEANING OF ANY CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY LIMITATIONS OF INDEBTEDNESS OR PROVISIONS THEREFOR. PURSUANT TO THE INDENTURE, SUFFICIENT REVENUES HAVE BEEN PLEDGED AND WILL BE SET ASIDE INTO SPECIAL FUNDS BY THE CITY TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROMPT PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON THIS BOND AND ALL BONDS OF THE SERIES OF WHICH IT IS A PART. This Bond and the issue of Bonds of which it is a part are issued in conformity with and after full compliance with the Constitution of the State of Utah and pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Bonding Act, Chapter 14 of Title 11, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), and all other laws applicable thereto. This Bond is a special obligation of the City and is one of the Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds of the City (the “Bonds”) issued under and by virtue of the Act and under and pursuant to a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as heretofore amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, as trustee (said trustee and any successor thereto under the Master Indenture being herein referred to as the “Trustee”), and as further amended and supplemented by a Fourteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of __________ 1, 2022 (the “Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture”), between the City and the Trustee (such Master Indenture, as amended and supplemented by the Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture and as hereafter amended and supplemented, being herein referred to as the “Indenture”), for the purpose of financing certain capital improvement projects within the City and paying all expenses incident to the issuance of the Series 2022B Bonds described below. As provided in the Indenture, Bonds may be issued from time to time in one or more series in various principal amounts, may mature at different times, may bear interest at different rates, A-3 Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture and may otherwise vary as provided in the Indenture, and the aggregate principal amount of Bonds which may be issued is not limited. All Bonds issued and to be issued under the Indenture are and will be equally and ratably secured by the pledge and covenants made therein, except as otherwise expressly provided or permitted in or pursuant to the Indenture. This Bond is one of a Series of Bonds designated as “Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B” (the “Series 2022B Bonds”), limited to the aggregate principal amount of $__________, dated as of the dated date identified above, and duly issued under and by virtue of the Act and under and pursuant to the Indenture. Copies of the Indenture are on file at the office of the City Recorder in Salt Lake City, Utah, and at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee, in Salt Lake City, Utah, and reference to the Indenture and the Act is made for a description of the pledge and covenants securing the Series 2022B Bonds, the nature, manner and extent of enforcement of such pledge and covenants, the terms and conditions upon which the Series 2022B Bonds are issued and additional Bonds may be issued thereunder, and a statement of the rights, duties, immunities and obligations of the City and of the Trustee. Such pledge and other obligations of the City under the Indenture may be discharged at or prior to the maturity or redemption of the Series 2022B Bonds upon the making of provision for the payment thereof on the terms and conditions set forth in the Indenture. To the extent and in the respects permitted by the Indenture, the Indenture may be modified, supplemented or amended by action on behalf of the City taken in the manner and subject to the conditions and exceptions prescribed in the Indenture. The holder or owner of this Bond shall have no right to enforce the provisions of the Indenture or to institute action to enforce the pledge or covenants made therein or to take any action with respect to an event of default under the Indenture or to institute, appear in, or defend any suit or other proceeding with respect thereto, except as provided in the Indenture. This Bond is transferable, as provided in the Indenture, only upon the books of the City kept for that purpose at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his or her attorney duly authorized in writing, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Trustee, duly executed by the registered owner or such duly authorized attorney, and thereupon the City shall issue in the name of the transferee a new registered Bond or Bonds of the same aggregate principal amount and series, designation, maturity and interest rate as the surrendered Bond, all as provided in the Indenture and upon the payment of the charges therein prescribed. The City and the Trustee may treat and consider the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the holder and absolute owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal or redemption price hereof and interest due hereon and for all other purposes whatsoever. The Series 2022B Bonds are issuable solely in the form of fully registered Bonds, without coupons, in the denomination of $5,000 or any whole multiple of $5,000. [The Series 2022B Bonds maturing on or after [October] 1, 203_, are subject to redemption, in whole or in part, at the election of the City on any date on or after __________ 1, 203_ (if in part, such Series 2022B Bonds to be redeemed shall be selected from such maturities as shall be determined by the City in its discretion and within each maturity as selected by the Trustee), upon A-4 Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture notice given as hereinafter set forth, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the redemption date. The Series 2022B Bonds maturing on [October] 1, 20__ (the “Series 2022B Term Bonds”), are subject to redemption in part by operation of Sinking Fund Installments as provided in the Indenture, upon notice as provided in the Indenture, at a redemption price equal to the Principal amount of the Series 2022B Term Bonds or portion thereof to be redeemed, together with accrued interest to the date of redemption. The amounts and due dates of the Sinking Fund Installments for the Series 2022B Term Bonds are set forth in the following table: [OCTOBER] 1 OF THE YEAR MANDATORY REDEMPTION AMOUNT $ * ___________________ * Stated Maturity In determining the amount of any Sinking Fund Installment due on any date specified above, there shall be deducted the principal amount of any Series 2022B Term Bonds which have been redeemed or purchased on a date not less than 30 days preceding the date on which such Sinking Fund Installment is due from moneys accumulated in the Bond Service Account with respect to such Sinking Fund Installment. Upon any purchase or redemption of the Series 2022B Term Bonds, there will be credited toward the Sinking Fund Installments thereafter to become due such amount as may be designated by the City in a Written Request delivered to the Trustee. With respect to any notice of optional redemption of Series 2022B Bonds, unless upon the giving of such notice such Series 2022B Bonds shall be deemed to have been paid within the meaning of Article XI of the Indenture, such notice may state that such redemption shall be conditioned upon the receipt by the Trustee on or prior to the date fixed for such redemption of money sufficient to pay the Redemption Price of and interest on the Series 2022B Bonds to be redeemed, and that if such money shall not have been so received said notice shall be of no force and effect, and the City shall not be required to redeem such Series 2022B Bonds. In the event that such notice of redemption contains such a condition and such money is not so received, the redemption shall not be made and the Trustee shall within a reasonable time thereafter give notice, in the manner in which the notice of redemption was given, that such money was not so received and that such redemption was not made. If less than all of the Series 2022B Bonds are to be redeemed, the particular Series 2022B Bonds to be redeemed shall be selected as provided in the Indenture. Notice of redemption shall be given by first-class mail, not less than thirty nor more than sixty days prior to the redemption date, to the registered owner of each Series 2022B Bond being A-5 Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture redeemed, at his or her address as it appears on the bond registration books of the Trustee or at such address as he may have filed with the Trustee for that purpose. If notice of redemption shall have been given as aforesaid, the Series 2022B Bonds or portions thereof specified in said notice shall become due and payable at the applicable redemption price on the redemption date therein designated, and if on the redemption date moneys for the payment of the redemption price of all the Series 2022B Bonds to be redeemed, together with interest to the redemption date, shall be available for such payment on said date, then from and after the redemption date interest on such Series 2022B Bonds shall cease to accrue and become payable. Less than all of a Series 2022B Bond in a denomination in excess of $5,000 may be so redeemed, and in such case, upon the surrender of such Series 2022B Bond, there shall be issued to the registered owner thereof, without charge therefor, for the unredeemed balance of the principal amount of such Series 2022B Bond, at the option of such owner, registered Series 2022B Bonds of any of the authorized denominations, all as more fully set forth in the Indenture.] Except as otherwise provided herein and unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, words and phrases used herein shall have the same meanings as such words and phrases in the Indenture. It is hereby certified and recited that all conditions, acts and things required by the Constitution or statutes of the State of Utah or by the Act or the Indenture to exist, to have happened or to have been performed precedent to or in the issuance of this Bond exist, have happened and have been performed and that the issue of Bonds, together with all other indebtedness of the City, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by said Constitution and statutes. This Bond shall not be valid until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been signed by the Trustee. (Signature page follows.) A-6 Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, has caused this Bond to be signed in its name and on its behalf by the signature of its Mayor, and its corporate seal to be impressed or imprinted hereon, and attested and countersigned by the signature of its City Recorder, all as of the dated date specified above. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH By ____________________________________ Mayor [SEAL] ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: By _________________________________ City Recorder A-7 Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture [FORM OF TRUSTEE’S CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION] This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the within mentioned Indenture and is one of the Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B, of Salt Lake City, Utah. Date of registration and authentication: _______________________. ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee By ____________________________________ Authorized Officer A-8 Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture [FORM OF ASSIGNMENT] The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of the within Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations. TEN COM — as tenants in common TEN ENT — as tenants by the entirety JT TEN — as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UNIF TRAN MIN ACT— _______ Custodian _______ (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act of _________________________________ (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned sells, assigns and transfers unto Insert Social Security or Other Identifying Number of Assignee ______________________________________________________________________________ (Please Print or Typewrite Name and Address of Assignee) the within Bond of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints _________________________________________________________ attorney to register the transfer of the Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. DATED: ______________________ SIGNATURE: ____________________________ SIGNATURE GUARANTEED: _______________________________ NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an “eligible guarantor institution” meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in STAMP or such other “signature guarantee program” as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever. B-1 Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture EXHIBIT B CURRENTLY ANTICIPATED SERIES 2022B PROJECTS Draft 4/4/22 SLC 22B Certificate of Determination v2 871____/RDB/mo CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. __ OF 2022 PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS DATED: __________, 2022 1. Authority; Definitions. Pursuant to Resolution No. __ of 2022, adopted by the City Council (the “City Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”) on __________, 2022 (the “Resolution”), the City Council has authorized the issuance of the City’s Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B (the “Series 2022B Bonds”) under and pursuant to that certain Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as heretofore amended and supplemented, and as further amended and supplemented by that certain Fourteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of __________ 1, 2022 (collectively, the “Indenture”), each between the City and the Zions Bancorporation, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”). This certificate is executed pursuant to and in accordance with the delegation of authority contained in the Resolution, as authorized by law. All terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings specified in the Resolution or the Indenture. 2. Acceptance of Offer. The offer of ____________________ (the “Underwriter”) for the purchase of the Series 2022B Bonds, which is set out in full in the Bond Purchase Contract, dated the date hereof (the “Purchase Contract”), between the City and Underwriter, is hereby accepted, it being hereby found, determined and declared that such offer is in the best interests of the City. The Series 2022B Bonds shall be issued by the City for the purposes set forth in the Indenture. The sale of the Series 2022B Bonds to the Underwriter at the price of $____________ (representing the par amount of the Series 2022B Bonds, less $__________ Underwriter’s discount) is hereby confirmed. The Series 2022B Bonds shall be delivered to the Underwriter and the proceeds of sale thereof applied as provided in the Indenture, the Purchase Contract and paragraph 4 hereof. 3. Aggregate Principal Amount and Maturities of Series 2022B Bonds. The Series 2022B Bonds shall be issued in the aggregate principal amount of $__________. The Series 2022B Bonds shall mature on [October] 1 of the years, and shall bear interest payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1, commencing __________ 1, 2022, at the rates per annum as follows: [OCTOBER] 1 AMOUNT MATURING INTEREST RATE - 2 - 2022B Certificate of Determination 4. Use of Proceeds. The proceeds of the sale of the Series 2022B Bonds shall be deposited and used as follows: (i) $-0- into the Series 2022B Bond Service Subaccount; (ii) $-0- into the Series 2022B Debt Service Reserve Subaccount; and (iv) all remaining proceeds shall be deposited into the Series 2022B Project Account. 6. Redemption. (a) The Series 2022B Bonds maturing on or after [October] 1, 20__, are subject to redemption at the election of the City on any date on or after __________ 1, 20__, in whole or in part (if in part, such Series 2022B Bonds to be redeemed will be selected from such maturities as are determined by the City in its discretion and within each maturity as selected by the Trustee), upon notice as provided below. Such optional redemption of the Series 2022B Bonds will be at the redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof, but without premium, plus accrued interest thereon to the redemption date. (b) The Series 2022B Bonds maturing on [October] 1, 20__ (the “Series 2022B Term Bonds”) are subject to redemption in part by operation of Sinking Fund Installments as provided in the Indenture, upon notice as provided in Section 4.03 of the Indenture, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the Series 2022B Term Bonds or portion thereof to be redeemed, together with accrued interest to the date of redemption. The amounts and due dates of the Sinking Fund Installments for the Series 2022B Term Bonds are set forth in the following table: [OCTOBER] 1 OF THE YEAR SINKING FUND INSTALLMENT AMOUNT ___________________ * Stated Maturity (Signature page follows.) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hand on the ____ day of __________, 2022. By ____________________________________ Mayor By ____________________________________ Chair Salt Lake City Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By ____________________________________ Senior City Attorney PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED __________, 2022 ____________________ * Preliminary; subject to change. Th i s P r e l i m i n a r y O f f i c i a l S t a t e m e n t a n d t h e i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d h e r e i n a r e s u b j e c t t o c o m p l e t i o n , a m e n d m e n t o r o t h e r c h a n g e w i t h o u t a n y n o t i c e . U n d e r n o c i r c u m s t a n c e s s h a l l t h i s P r e l i m i n a r y O f f i c i a l S t a t e m e n t co n s t i t u t e a n o f f e r t o s e l l o r t h e s o l i c i t a t i o n o f a n o f f e r t o b u y , n o r s h a l l t h e r e b e a n y s a l e o f t h e s e s e c u r i t i e s i n a n y j u r i s d i c t i o n i n w h i c h s u c h o f f e r , s o l i c i t a t i o n o r s a l e w o u l d b e u n l a w f u l p r i o r t o r e g i s t r a t i o n o r q u a l i f i c a t i o n un d e r t h e s e c u r i t i e s l a w s o f a n y s u c h j u r i s d i c t i o n . NEW ISSUE—Issued in Book-Entry Only Form RATINGS: Moody’s “____” S&P “____” See “RATINGS” herein. Interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds is includible in gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under the existing laws of the State of Utah, as presently enacted and construed, interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds is exempt from taxes imposed by the Utah Individual Income Tax Act. See “TAX TREATMENT” herein for a more complete discussion. $__________* SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH [FEDERALLY TAXABLE] SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2022_ DATED: Dates of Delivery DUE: October 1, as shown on inside-cover The $__________* [Federally Taxable] Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022_, dated the date of delivery thereof, are issuable by the City as fully-registered bonds and, when initially issued, will be in book-entry form only, registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York. DTC will act as securities depository for the Series 2022_ Bonds. See “THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS – Book-Entry Only System” herein. The Series 2022_ Bonds are being issued for the purpose of paying all or part of the cost of (a) (i) acquiring, constructing and improving __________________ and (ii) acquiring, constructing, improving and remodeling various other capital improvement program projects; (b) funding any necessary reserves and contingencies in connection with the Series 2022_ Bonds and (c) paying all related costs authorized by law. Principal of and interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds (interest payable April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing __________ 1, 202_) are payable by Zions Bancorporation, National Association, Salt Lake City, Utah, as Trustee, to the registered owners thereof, initially DTC. [The Series 2022_ Bonds are subject to optional redemption prior to maturity.][The Series 2022_ Bonds are not subject to redemption.] See “THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS – Redemption Provisions” herein.] The Series 2022_ Bonds are special limited obligations of the City payable solely from the Revenues, moneys, securities and funds pledged therefor under the Indenture on a parity basis with the Bonds, including the Outstanding Parity Bonds, that have been or may be issued by the City pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture. The Revenues consist of the Pledged Excise Taxes. No assurance can be given that the Revenues will remain sufficient for the payment of the Principal of or interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds, and the City is limited by Utah law in its ability to increase the rate of the Pledged Excise Taxes. See “RISK FACTORS” herein. The Series 2022_ Bonds do not constitute a general obligation indebtedness or a pledge of the ad valorem taxing power or the full faith and credit of the City, and are not obligations of the State of Utah or any other agency or other political subdivision or entity of the State of Utah. See “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS” herein. The Series 2022_ Bonds are offered when, as and if issued and received by the Underwriter, subject to prior sale and to the approval of legality by Chapman and Cutler LLP, Bond Counsel, and certain other conditions. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the City by Katherine N. Lewis, City Attorney and by Chapman and Cutler LLP, Disclosure Counsel to the City. The Underwriter is being represented by its counsel, _______________. It is expected that Series 2022_ Bonds will be available for delivery on or about __________, 2022 to DTC or its agent. [Underwriter] This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only. It is not a summary of this issue. Investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision. This Official Statement is dated __________, 2022 and the information contained herein speaks only as of that date. MATURITY SCHEDULE $__________* SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH [FEDERALLY TAXABLE] SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2022_ DUE OCTOBER 1 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT* INTEREST RATE YIELD CUSIP† 79560T $ % % ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ * Preliminary; subject to change. † CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP Global Services (CGS) is managed on behalf of the American Bankers Association by S&P Capital IQ. Copyright© 2021 CUSIP Global Services. All rights reserved. CUSIP® data herein is provided by CUSIP Global Services. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the CGS database. CUSIP® numbers are provided for convenience of reference only. Neither the City nor the Underwriter or the Municipal Advisor take any responsibility for the accuracy of such numbers. $__________* SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH [FEDERALLY TAXABLE] SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2022_ Salt Lake City City and County Building 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 (801) 535-7946 CITY COUNCIL Daniel Dugan ............................................................................................................................ Council Chair Darin Mano ...................................................................................................................... Council Vice Chair Amy Fowler ......................................................................................................................... Council Member Victoria Petro-Eschler .......................................................................................................... Council Member Alejandro Puy ...................................................................................................................... Council Member Analia Valdemoros .............................................................................................................. Council Member Chris Wharton ...................................................................................................................... Council Member CITY ADMINISTRATION Erin J. Mendenhall ............................................................................................................................... Mayor Rachel Otto ............................................................................................................................... Chief of Staff Katherine N. Lewis ................................................................................................................... City Attorney Cindy Lou Trishman ................................................................................................................. City Recorder Marina Scott ............................................................................................................................. City Treasurer BOND COUNSEL UNDERWRITER Chapman and Cutler LLP _______________ 215 South State, Suite 560 _______________ Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 _______________ (801) 533-0066 (___) ___-____ MUNICIPAL ADVISOR UNDERWRITER’S COUNSEL Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated _______________ 15 West South Temple, Suite 1090 _______________ Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 _______________ (385) 799-7231 (___) ___-____ TRUSTEE, REGISTRAR AND PAYING AGENT INDEPENDENT AUDITORS Zions Bancorporation, National Association Eide Bailly LLP One South Main Street, 12th Floor 5 Triad Center, Suite 600 Salt Lake City, Utah 84133 Salt Lake City, Utah 84180 (801) 844-7517 (801) 532-2200 * Preliminary; subject to change. The information set forth herein has been obtained from Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), The Depository Trust Company and other sources that are believed to be reliable. No dealer, broker, salesperson or any other person has been authorized by the City or the Underwriter to give any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this Official Statement in connection with the offering contained herein, and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the Underwriter. This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of, the Series 2022_ Bonds by any person in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such offer, solicitation or sale. The information and expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice, and neither delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale made thereafter shall under any circumstances create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the City or in any other information contained herein since the date hereof. IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING, THE UNDERWRITER MAY ENGAGE IN TRANSACTIONS THAT STABILIZE, MAINTAIN OR OTHERWISE AFFECT MARKET PRICES OF THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS. SUCH TRANSACTIONS, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME. THE UNDERWRITER HAS PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE FOR INCLUSION IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT. THE UNDERWRITER HAS REVIEWED THE INFORMATION IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND AS PART OF ITS RESPONSIBILITIES TO INVESTORS UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS AS APPLIED TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS TRANSACTION, BUT THE UNDERWRITER DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF SUCH INFORMATION. This Official Statement contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements concerning expectations, beliefs, opinions, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. The forward-looking statements in this Official Statement are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such statements. _________________________ THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. _________________________ The City maintains a website. However, the information presented on that website is not a part of this Official Statement and should not be relied upon in making an investment decision with respect to the Series 2022_ Bonds. - i - TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................1 The City ..................................................................................................................................1 Authorization and Purpose of the Series 2022_ Bonds ..........................................................2 Security and Source of Payment .............................................................................................2 Outstanding Parity Bonds .......................................................................................................3 Additional Bonds ....................................................................................................................3 No Debt Service Reserve ........................................................................................................4 Redemption .............................................................................................................................4 Registration, Denomination and Manner of Payment.............................................................4 Tax Treatment .........................................................................................................................4 Conditions of Delivery, Anticipated Date, Manner and Place of Delivery ............................5 Continuing Disclosure ............................................................................................................5 Basic Documentation ..............................................................................................................5 Contact Person ........................................................................................................................6 Additional Information ...........................................................................................................6 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS..........................................................................................................6 THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS ................................................................................................................7 General ....................................................................................................................................7 Book-Entry Only System ........................................................................................................7 Payment of Principal and Interest ...........................................................................................8 Redemption Provisions ...........................................................................................................8 Notice of Redemption .............................................................................................................9 Registration, Transfer and Exchange ......................................................................................9 SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS .......................................................................................10 Pledged Excise Taxes ...........................................................................................................10 Historical Pledged Excise Taxes ...........................................................................................14 State Pledge of Nonimpairment ............................................................................................15 Flow of Funds .......................................................................................................................15 No Debt Service Reserve ......................................................................................................15 Outstanding Parity Bonds .....................................................................................................16 Additional Bonds ..................................................................................................................16 DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE ON THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS AND THE OUTSTANDING PARITY BONDS....................................................................................................................18 RISK FACTORS ................................................................................................................................18 Uncertainty of Revenues .......................................................................................................19 The Series 2022_ Bonds are Limited Obligations ................................................................19 Limitation on Increasing Rates for Pledged Excise Taxes ...................................................19 Possible Use of Special Revenues to Meet Additional Bonds Test; Reliance on Rating Agencies ..............................................................................................................19 Potential Impact of the Coronavirus .....................................................................................20 Climate Change .....................................................................................................................20 Cybersecurity ........................................................................................................................21 THE CITY ........................................................................................................................................21 City Officials .........................................................................................................................21 - ii - City Administration ..............................................................................................................22 City Fund Structure; Accounting Basis ................................................................................23 Financial Controls .................................................................................................................23 Budget and Appropriation Process .......................................................................................23 Insurance Coverage ...............................................................................................................24 Investment Policy..................................................................................................................25 Employee Workforce and Retirement System; Postemployment Benefits ..........................27 DEBT STRUCTURE ...........................................................................................................................29 Outstanding Debt Issues .......................................................................................................29 FUTURE DEBT PLANS ......................................................................................................................30 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ................................................................................................................30 FINANCIAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE CITY ...........................................................................32 Five Year Financial Summary ..............................................................................................32 Assessed Taxable and Estimated Fair Market Value of Taxable Property ...........................36 Principal Property Taxpayers ................................................................................................36 TAX TREATMENT ............................................................................................................................36 Federal Income Taxation ......................................................................................................36 Utah Income Taxation...........................................................................................................37 NO DEFAULTED BONDS ..................................................................................................................37 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT .........................................................................................37 UNDERWRITING ..............................................................................................................................38 RATINGS .........................................................................................................................................38 MUNICIPAL ADVISOR ......................................................................................................................39 LEGAL MATTERS ............................................................................................................................39 Litigation ...............................................................................................................................39 Approval of Legal Proceedings ............................................................................................40 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ................................................................................................................40 MISCELLANEOUS ............................................................................................................................40 Additional Information .........................................................................................................40 APPENDIX A — SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021 APPENDIX B — MASTER TRUST INDENTURE APPENDIX C — DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC INFORMATION REGARDING THE CITY AND SALT LAKE COUNTY APPENDIX D — PROPOSED FORM OF OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL APPENDIX E — PROVISIONS REGARDING BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM APPENDIX F — FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT OFFICIAL STATEMENT RELATING TO $__________* SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH [FEDERALLY TAXABLE] SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2022_ INTRODUCTION This Official Statement, including the cover page, introduction, and appendices, provides information in connection with the issuance and sale by Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), of its $__________* [Federally Taxable] Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022_ (the “Series 2022_ Bonds”), initially issued in book-entry form only. This introduction is not a summary of this Official Statement. It is only a brief description of and guide to, and is qualified by more complete and detailed information contained in the entire Official Statement, including the cover page and appendices hereto, and the documents summarized or described herein. A full review should be made of the entire Official Statement. The offering of the Series 2022_ Bonds to potential investors is made only by means of the entire Official Statement. See also the following appendices attached hereto: “APPENDIX A – SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021;” “APPENDIX B – MASTER TRUST INDENTURE;” “APPENDIX C – DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC INFORMATION REGARDING THE CITY AND SALT LAKE COUNTY;” “APPENDIX D – PROPOSED FORM OF OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL;” “APPENDIX E – PROVISIONS REGARDING BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM” and “APPENDIX F – FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.” Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined are defined in the conformed copy of the Indenture (defined below) attached hereto as “APPENDIX B – MASTER TRUST INDENTURE.” THE CITY The City is a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Utah (the “State”) and is the capital of the State. The City is the most populous city in the State, with the [census 2020 population of 199,723]. The City has a council-mayor form of government. For more information with respect to the City, see “THE CITY,” “DEBT STRUCTURE,” “FINANCIAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE CITY,” “APPENDIX A – SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021” and “APPENDIX C – DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC INFORMATION REGARDING THE CITY AND SALT LAKE COUNTY.” * Preliminary; subject to change. - 2 - AUTHORIZATION AND PURPOSE OF THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS The Series 2022_ Bonds are being issued pursuant to (i) the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Utah Code”), and other applicable provisions of law (collectively, the “Act”), (ii) a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City on __________, 2022 (the “Resolution”), that provides for the issuance and delivery of the Series 2022_ Bonds, and (iii) a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as heretofore amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), and as further amended and supplemented by a Fourteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of __________, 2022 (the “Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture” and, together with the Master Indenture, the “Indenture”), each between the City and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”). A conformed copy of the Master Indenture is attached hereto as APPENDIX B. The proceeds from the sale of the Series 2022_ Bonds will be used for the purpose of (a) financing all or a portion of the cost of (i) acquiring, constructing and improving _______________________ and (ii) acquiring, constructing, improving and remodeling various other capital improvement program projects (collectively, the “Series 2022_ Project”) and (b) paying the costs incurred in connection with the issuance and sale of the Series 2022_ Bonds. SECURITY AND SOURCE OF PAYMENT The Series 2022_ Bonds will be special limited obligations of the City, payable solely from and secured solely by a pledge of the Revenues and certain funds and accounts pledged therefor in the Indenture. “Revenues” means, collectively, all of the revenues received by the City that are produced by: (a) local sales and use taxes (the “Local Sales Taxes”) levied pursuant to the Local Sales and Use Tax Act, Title 59, Chapter 12, Part 2, Utah Code (the “Local Sales and Use Tax Act”); (b) sales and use taxes (the “Supplemental Sales Taxes” and, collectively with the Local Sales Taxes, the “Sales Taxes”) levied pursuant to the Impacted Communities Taxes Act, Title 59, Chapter 12, Part 4 of the Utah Code (the “Impacted Communities Taxes Act”); (c) municipal energy sales and use taxes (the “Municipal Energy Taxes”); (d) municipal telecommunications license taxes (the “Telecommunications Taxes” and, collectively with the Sales Taxes and the Municipal Energy Taxes, the “Pledged Sales and Use Taxes”); (e) franchise fees for electric energy (the “Energy Franchise Fees”)1; 1 Energy Franchise Fees were collected under a franchise agreement with a public electric utility that expired in 2016. After the expiration of the agreement, the Municipal Energy Taxes automatically began to be levied on the sale or use of the electricity provided by such utility. - 3 - (f) franchise fees charged to the City’s Public Utilities Department (the “Public Utilities Franchise Fees”); and (g) franchise fees associated with cable television (the “Cable Franchise Fees” and, collectively with the Energy Franchise Fees and the Public Utilities Franchise Fees, the “Pledged Franchise Fees”). The term Revenues is used interchangeably herein with the term Pledged Excise Taxes. No assurance can be given that the Revenues will remain sufficient for the payment of the Principal or interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds and the City is limited by contract or by State law in its ability to increase the rate of the Pledged Excise Taxes. See “RISK FACTORS” herein. The Series 2022_ Bonds do not constitute a general obligation indebtedness or a pledge of the ad valorem taxing power or the full faith and credit of the City, and are not obligations of the State or any other agency or other political subdivision or entity of the State. See “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS” herein. The City currently levies the Pledged Excise Taxes at the maximum rates permitted by State law. In general, the Pledged Sales and Use Taxes are collected by the Utah State Tax Commission (the “Tax Commission”) and distributed to the City and all other counties and municipalities in the State on a monthly basis. The Pledged Franchise Fees are collected by the applicable franchisee and distributed to the City as required by contract or ordinance. See “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS – Pledged Excise Taxes” and “RISK FACTORS” herein for additional information. OUTSTANDING PARITY BONDS {TO BE UPDATED.} The Series 2022_ Bonds will be issued on a parity with any other outstanding Bonds (as defined below) issued from time to time under the Master Indenture, including, but not limited to, the City’s (i) Series 2013B Bonds, currently outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $690,000 (the “Series 2013B Bonds”), (ii) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B, currently outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $7,955,000 (the “Series 2014B Bonds”), (iii) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A, currently outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $15,920,000 (the “Series 2016A Bonds”), (iv) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A, currently outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $2,095,000 (the “Series 2019A Bonds”), (v) Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B, currently outstanding in the amount of $57,740,000 (the “Series 2019B Bonds” and, collectively with the Series 2013B Bonds, the Series 2014B Bonds, the Series 2016A Bonds, the Series 2019A Bonds and the Series 2019B Bonds, the “Outstanding Parity Bonds”). ADDITIONAL BONDS The Indenture permits the issuance of additional bonds secured by the Revenues, but requires that the City provide certain certificates relating to certain conditions to the issuance of Additional Bonds (as defined below). Included in those conditions is the requirement that the - 4 - Revenues for any Year within the 24 calendar months next preceding the authentication and delivery of the Bonds (as defined below) proposed to be issued are equal to or greater than 200% of the Maximum Annual Debt Service on all Outstanding Bonds upon the issuance of the Bonds proposed to be issued. See “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS – Additional Bonds” herein. The Series 2022_ Bonds, the Outstanding Parity Bonds and any additional bonds heretofore or hereafter issued under the Indenture (the “Additional Bonds”) are referred to collectively herein as the “Bonds.” NO DEBT SERVICE RESERVE There is no debt service reserve for either the Series 2022_ Bonds or the Series 2022_ Bonds. See “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS — No Debt Service Reserve” herein. [REDEMPTION The Series 2022_ Bonds are subject to optional redemption prior to maturity as described herein. See “THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS – Redemption Provisions” herein.] REGISTRATION, DENOMINATION AND MANNER OF PAYMENT The Series 2022_ Bonds will be issued only as fully-registered bonds, and initially, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”). DTC will act as a securities depository for the Series 2022_ Bonds and purchases of beneficial interests in the Series 2022_ Bonds initially will be made in book-entry only form through brokers and dealers who are, or who act through DTC participants, and under certain circumstances are exchangeable as more fully described herein. The Series 2022_ Bonds will be issued in the denomination of $5,000 and any whole multiple thereof. Principal of and any premium on the Series 2022_ Bonds are payable upon surrender thereof at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee, as Paying Agent for the Series 2022_ Bonds. Interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds is payable on each Interest Payment Date (defined below) to the registered owners thereof (initially DTC), as described herein. So long as DTC or its nominee, Cede & Co., is the registered owner of the Series 2022_ Bonds, payments of the Principal of, and interest on such Series 2022_ Bonds will be made directly to DTC. See “THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS – Book-Entry Only System” herein. TAX TREATMENT Interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds is includible in gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under the existing laws of the State of Utah, as presently enacted and construed, interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds is exempt from taxes imposed by the Utah Individual Income Tax Act. See “TAX TREATMENT.” - 5 - CONDITIONS OF DELIVERY, ANTICIPATED DATE, MANNER AND PLACE OF DELIVERY The Series 2022_ Bonds are offered, subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued and received by the Underwriter, subject to the approving legal opinions of Chapman and Cutler LLP, Bond Counsel, and certain other conditions. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the City by the City Attorney and by Chapman and Cutler LLP, as the City’s Disclosure Counsel. The Underwriter is being represented by its counsel, __________. It is expected that the Series 2022_ Bonds in book-entry only form will be available for delivery through DTC or its agent on or about __________, 2022. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE The City will execute a Continuing Disclosure Agreement for the benefit of the beneficial owners of the Series 2022_ Bonds to enable the Underwriter to comply with the requirements of Rule 15c2-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. See “CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT” and “APPENDIX F—FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.” BASIC DOCUMENTATION This Official Statement speaks only as of its date, and the information contained herein is subject to change. Brief descriptions of the City and the Series 2022_ Bonds are included in this Official Statement. Such descriptions do not purport to be comprehensive or definitive. All references herein to the Indenture are qualified in their entirety by reference to such document, and references herein to the Series 2022_ Bonds are qualified in their entirety by reference to the form thereof included in the Indenture and the information with respect thereto included in the aforementioned document, copies of which are available for inspection at the principal office of the Trustee on or after the delivery of the Series 2022_ Bonds. Descriptions of the Indenture and the Series 2022_ Bonds are qualified by reference to bankruptcy2 laws affecting the remedies for the enforcement of the rights and security provided therein and the effect of the exercise of the police power by any entity having jurisdiction. During the period of the offering of the Series 2022_ Bonds, copies of the preliminary forms of any of the aforementioned documents will be available from the “contact persons” as indicated herein. Also see “APPENDIX B – MASTER TRUST INDENTURE” herein. The “basic documentation,” which includes the Resolution, the Indenture and other documentation authorizing the issuance of the Series 2022_ Bonds and establishing the rights and responsibilities of the City and other parties to the transaction, may be obtained from the “contact persons” as indicated herein. 2 There is currently no specific authorization under the Utah Code for the City to file bankruptcy under Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. - 6 - CONTACT PERSON The primary contact for the City in connection with the issuance of the Series 2022_ Bonds is: Marina Scott, City Treasurer 451 South State Street, Room 228 P.O. Box 145462 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5462 (801) 535-6565 e-mail: marina.scott@slcgov.com ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In preparing this Official Statement, the City has relied upon information furnished by DTC and others. This Official Statement also includes summaries of the terms of the Series 2022_ Bonds, the Indenture, certain provisions of the Act and the Utah Code. The summaries of and references to all documents and statutes referred to herein do not purport to be complete, comprehensive or definitive, and each such summary and reference is qualified in its entirety by reference to each such document or statute. Any statements in this Official Statement involving matters of opinion, whether or not expressly so stated, are intended as such and not as representations of the fact. This Official Statement is not to be construed as a contract or agreement between the City and the purchasers or owners of any of the Series 2022_ Bonds. SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS The estimated sources and uses of funds for the Series 2022_ Bonds are shown below: SOURCES OF FUNDS Par Amount of Series 2022_ Bonds $ Original Issue Premium for Series 2022_ Bonds Total $ USES OF FUNDS Deposit to Series 2022_ Project Account $ Costs of Issuance(1) Total $ _________________________ (1) Costs of Issuance include legal, Municipal Advisor, rating agency fees, Underwriter’s discount and Trustee fees; and other costs and expenses related to the issuance of the Series 2022_ Bonds. - 7 - THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS GENERAL The Series 2022_ Bonds will be dated the date of delivery thereof and will bear interest from that date (calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1 of each year (each an “Interest Payment Date” and, collectively, the “Interest Payment Dates”), commencing __________ 1, 202_. The Series 2022_ Bonds will mature on the dates and in the amounts and will bear interest at the rates set forth on the inside front cover page of this Official Statement. The Series 2022_ Bonds are issuable as fully-registered bonds, without coupons, and when initially issued will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, which will act as securities depository for the Series 2022_ Bonds. The Series 2022_ Bonds will be issued in the denomination of $5,000 and any whole multiple thereof. So long as the book-entry only system is in effect, purchases of beneficial ownership interests in the Series 2022_ Bonds will be made in book-entry form only, in the principal amount of $5,000 and any whole multiple thereof. See “APPENDIX E – PROVISIONS REGARDING BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM.” The Series 2022_ Bonds are special limited obligations of the City, payable solely from the proceeds of the Series 2022_ Bonds, the Revenues, moneys, securities and funds pledged therefor in the Indenture. The Revenues consist of the Pledged Excise Taxes. No assurance can be given that the Revenues will remain sufficient for the payment of the Principal or interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds and the City is limited by State law in its ability to increase the rate of the Pledged Excise Taxes. See “RISK FACTORS” herein. The Series 2022_ Bonds do not constitute a general obligation indebtedness or a pledge of the ad valorem taxing power or the full faith and credit of the City, and are not obligations of the State or any other agency or other political subdivision or entity of the State. See “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS” herein. BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM The Series 2022_ Bonds originally will be issued solely in book-entry form to DTC or its nominee, Cede & Co., to be held in DTC’s book-entry only system. So long as such Series 2022_ Bonds are held in the book-entry only system, DTC or its nominee will be the Registered Owner or Holder of such Series 2022_ Bonds for all purposes of the Indenture, the Series 2022_ Bonds and this Official Statement. For a description of the book-entry only system, see “APPENDIX E – PROVISIONS REGARDING BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM.” The City may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry transfers through DTC (or a successor securities depository). In that event, the Series 2022_ Bonds will be printed and delivered and will be governed by the provisions of the Indenture with respect to payment of Principal and interest and rights of exchange and transfer. The City cannot and does not give any assurances that DTC participants or others will distribute payments with respect to the Series 2022_ Bonds received by DTC or its nominee as the - 8 - Registered Owner, or any prepayment or other notices, to the Beneficial Owners, or that they will do so on a timely basis, or that DTC will service and act in the manner described in this Official Statement. For a description of the book-entry only system, see “APPENDIX E – PROVISIONS REGARDING BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM.” PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST The Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on, the Series 2022_ Bonds are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. In the event that the book-entry only system has been terminated, Principal of and Redemption Price on the Series 2022_ Bonds when due will be payable at the principal corporate trust operations office of the Trustee, or of its successor as Paying Agent for the Series 2022_ Bonds. In the event that the book-entry only system has been terminated, payment of interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds will be paid by check or draft mailed on an Interest Payment Date to the Registered Owner of record as of the close of business on the Record Date at such Owner’s address as it appears on the registration books of the Trustee or at such other address as is furnished in writing by such Registered Owner to the Trustee prior to the Record Date. [REDEMPTION PROVISIONS Optional Redemption. The Series 2022_ Bonds maturing on or after October 1, 20__, are subject to redemption at the election of the City on any date on or after __________ 1, 20__, in whole or in part (if in part, such Series 2022_ Bonds to be redeemed will be selected from such maturities as are determined by the City in its discretion and within each maturity, as selected by the Trustee), upon notice as provided below. Such optional redemption of the Series 2022_ Bonds will be at the Redemption Price equal to the principal amount thereof, but without premium, plus accrued interest thereon to the redemption date. Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption. The Series 2022_ Bonds maturing on October 1, 20__ are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption prior to maturity at a price equal to the principal amount thereof, together with interest thereon accrued to the date of redemption. The Indenture requires funds to be provided on the dates and in the amounts set forth in the following table: OCTOBER 1 OF THE YEAR MANDATORY REDEMPTION AMOUNT $ * _______________ * Stated Maturity In determining the amount of any mandatory redemption installment due on any date specified above, there shall be deducted the principal amount of any Series 2022_ Bonds which have been - 9 - redeemed or purchased on a date not less than 30 days preceding the date on which such mandatory redemption installment is due from moneys accumulated in the Bond Service Account with respect to such mandatory redemption installment. Upon any purchase or redemption of the Series 2022_ Bonds, there will be credited toward the mandatory sinking fund redemption installments thereafter to become due such amount as may be designated by the City in a Written Request delivered to the Trustee. Partial Redemption. Upon surrender of a Series 2022_ Bond redeemed in part, the City will execute and the Trustee (or any Transfer Agent) will authenticate and deliver to the Holder thereof a new Series 2022_ Bond or Series 2022_ Bonds in the denomination of $5,000 and any whole multiple thereof equal in Principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Series 2022_ Bond surrendered. So long as the Series 2022_ Bonds are held in the book-entry only system, Series 2022_ Bonds will not be delivered as set forth above; rather transfers of beneficial ownership of the Series 2022_ Bonds to the person indicated will be effected on the registration books of DTC pursuant to its rules and procedures. See “APPENDIX E – PROVISIONS REGARDING BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM.”] NOTICE OF REDEMPTION At least 30 but not more than 60 days prior to each redemption date, the Trustee will mail notice of redemption by first-class mail to each Bondholder at the Holder’s registered address. Unless moneys sufficient to pay the Principal of, and interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds to be redeemed have been received by the Trustee prior to the giving of such notice of redemption, such notice may state that said redemption will be conditioned upon the receipt of such moneys by the Trustee on or prior to the date fixed for redemption. If such moneys are not received, such notice will be of no force and effect, the City will not redeem such Series 2022_ Bonds and the Trustee will give notice, in the same manner in which the notice of redemption was given, that such moneys were not so received and that such Series 2022_ Bonds will not be redeemed. Neither failure to give any required notice of redemption as to any particular Series 2022_ Bonds nor any defect in any notice so mailed will affect the validity of the call for redemption of any Series 2022_ Bonds. Any notice mailed as provided in this paragraph will be conclusively presumed to have been given whether or not actually received by the addressee. Except as otherwise described in the preceding paragraph with respect to a conditional notice of redemption, when notice of redemption is required and given, Series 2022_ Bonds called for redemption become due and payable on the redemption date at the applicable redemption price, and in such case when funds are deposited with the Trustee sufficient for redemption, interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds to be redeemed ceases to accrue as of the date of redemption. REGISTRATION, TRANSFER AND EXCHANGE In the event the book-entry system is discontinued, any Series 2022_ Bond may, in accordance with its terms, be transferred, upon the registration books kept by the Trustee, by the person in whose name it is registered, in person or by his or her duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of such Series 2022_ Bond for cancellation, or, if applicable, notation of the new Holder together with the signature of the Trustee or any applicable Transfer Agent on the back of such - 10 - Series 2022_ Bond, or on a form of record attached to such Series 2022_ Bond for such purpose, accompanied by delivery of a duly executed written instrument of transfer in a form approved by the Trustee. No transfer will be effective until entered on the registration books kept by the Trustee. For every such exchange or transfer of the Series 2022_ Bonds, the Trustee or the Transfer Agent will require the payment by the Bondholder requesting such exchange or transfer of any tax or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such exchange or transfer of the Series 2022_ Bonds. The City, the Trustee and any Transfer Agent are not required (a) to issue, register the transfer of or exchange any Series 2022_ Bond during a period beginning at the opening of business 15 days before the date of mailing of a notice of redemption of the Series 2022_ Bonds selected for redemption and ending on the close of business on the day of such mailing, or (b) to register the transfer of or exchange of any Series 2022_ Bond so selected for redemption in whole or in part, except the unredeemed portion of the Series 2022_ Bonds being redeemed in part. The City, the Trustee and the Transfer Agent may treat and consider the person in whose name each Series 2022_ Bond is registered in the registration books kept by the Trustee as the Holder and absolute owner of such Series 2022_ Bond for the purpose of payment of Principal of and interest on such Series 2022_ Bond and for all other purposes whatsoever. SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS PLEDGED EXCISE TAXES {TO BE UPDATED.} The Series 2022_ Bonds will be special limited obligations of the City, payable solely from and secured solely by a pledge of the Revenues, or the Pledged Excises Taxes, which consist of the Local Sales Taxes, the Municipal Energy Taxes, the Telecommunications Taxes, the Energy Franchise Fees, the Public Utilities Franchise Fees and the Cable Franchise Fees, each of which is described in more detail below. Sales Taxes. General. Sales tax is imposed on the amount paid or charged for sales of tangible personal property in the State and for services rendered in the State for the repair, renovation or installation of tangible personal property. Use tax is imposed on the amount paid or charged for the use, storage or other consumption of tangible personal property in the State, including services for the repair, renovation or installation of such tangible personal property. Sales and use taxes also apply to leases and rentals of tangible personal property if the tangible personal property is in the State, the lessee takes possession in the State or the tangible personal property is stored, used or otherwise consumed in the State. Local sales and use taxes, including the Sales Taxes, are collected by the Tax Commission and distributed on a monthly basis to each county, city and town. Local Sales Taxes. The Local Sales and Use Tax Act provides that each county, city and town in the State may levy a local sales and use tax of up to 1.00% on the purchase price of taxable - 11 - goods and services. The legislative intent contained in the Local Sales and Use Tax Act is to provide an additional source of revenues to counties and municipalities that is to be used to finance their capital outlay requirements and to service their bonded indebtedness. The City has levied the Local Sales Taxes at the maximum legal rate of 1.00%. The distributions of the Local Sales Taxes to the City from the Tax Commission are based on a formula, which provides that (a) 50% of each dollar of sales tax collections will be distributed on the basis of the population of the local government and (b) 50% of each dollar of sales tax collections will be distributed on the basis of the point of sale. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020, the City budgeted Local Sales Tax revenues of $65,350,000 and the City actually received revenues of $66,363,397. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021, the City budgeted Local Sales Tax revenues of $62,049,593, and the City actually received revenues of $__________. The City budgeted Local Sales Tax revenues of $__________ for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022; the City is currently projecting Local Sales Tax revenues of approximately $__________ for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Supplemental Sales Taxes. In connection with the construction of a new State prison in the northwestern quadrant of the City, the City was authorized under the Impacted Communities Taxes Act to impose a tax at a rate not to exceed .50% on the same transactions as are subject to the Local Sales Taxes, with certain exceptions for luxury items and unbundled food. By an ordinance passed on May 1, 2018, the City approved the levy of the Supplemental Sales Taxes beginning October 1, 2018. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020, the City budgeted Supplemental Sales Tax revenues of $34,542,000 and the City actually received revenues of $38,959,231. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021, the City budgeted Supplemental Sales Tax revenues of $32,797,506, and the City actually received revenues of $__________. The City budgeted Supplemental Sales Tax revenues of $__________ for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022; the City is currently projecting Supplemental Sales Tax revenues of approximately $__________ for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Collections. The City is not legally allowed to provide actual dollar figures of sales and use tax collections by specific businesses. However, during the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021, of the top 50 businesses, only seven of such businesses generated at least 1% of the total Sales Taxes collected in the City. Together, these seven businesses generated 11.10% of the Sales Tax revenues generated in the City. No single business accounted for more than 2.73% of the City’s total Sales Tax revenues. The five largest industry segments collecting the sales and use taxes include automotive, eating and drinking, grocery stores, non-durable goods and retail/miscellaneous. Other Non-pledged Sales and Use Taxes. In addition to the Local Sales Taxes levied by the City, the State levies a statewide sales and use tax (the “Statewide Tax”) which is currently imposed at a rate of 4.85% of the purchase price of taxable goods and services, excluding unprepared food and food ingredients. Sales of unprepared food and food ingredients are taxed at a rate of 1.75%. The State also levies a 2.00% tax on sales of natural gas, electricity and fuel oil - 12 - for residential use. The Statewide Tax is not pledged to payment of the Series 2022_ Bonds and is paid to the State. Additionally, counties and cities in the State are authorized to impose certain additional sales and use taxes for various purposes as authorized by State law. As of __________ 1, 2022, the combined sales and use tax levied on taxable goods and services within the City’s boundaries by the State, Salt Lake County and the City is [7.75]% and is comprised of certain of the various sales taxes mentioned in the preceding sentence, the Statewide Tax and the Sales Taxes. However, only the 1.50% portion of the revenues derived from the collection of these sales and use taxes makes up the Sales Taxes pledged to the payment of the debt service on the Series 2022_ Bonds. Municipal Energy Taxes and Energy Franchise Fees. Prior to July 1, 1998, municipalities were granted the authority to charge public utilities a franchise tax of up to 6% of gross revenue from the sale of taxable property or service, including providers of energy. In 1997, the Municipal Energy Sales and Use Tax Act, Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (the “Municipal Energy Tax Act”) was passed. The Municipal Energy Tax Act prohibited the collection of a franchise tax on suppliers of energy and authorized cities or towns to levy a municipal sales and use tax of up to 6% of the sale or use of taxable energy. The municipal energy sales and use tax is levied on the value of the sale or use of gas and electricity (including the value of the energy and the costs typically incurred in providing such energy in usable form to the customer). Certain limited transactions are exempted from the tax. The Municipal Energy Tax Act stipulates that municipalities with franchise fee agreements that were in effect prior to July 1, 1997, may continue to collect revenues under such agreements for the remaining term of such agreements. By City ordinance, there is credited against an entity’s Municipal Energy Tax liability an amount equal to any franchise fees collect by the City from such entity. The City had a franchise agreement with the major public electric utility servicing the residents of the City (the “Electric Franchise Agreement”) that implemented a 6% franchise fee on the gross revenues of such utility, which is the maximum permitted amount. The Electric Franchise Agreement expired in early 2016. Upon the expiration of the Electric Franchise Agreement, a Municipal Energy Tax of 6% automatically began to be levied on the sale or use of the electricity provided by the public electric utility. While Energy Franchise Fees are pledged as Revenues, no Energy Franchise Fees are currently being collected. The sale or use of all taxable energy within the City is currently being taxed at the maximum rate of 6% under the Municipal Energy Tax Act. Municipal energy sales and use taxes, including the Municipal Energy Taxes, are collected by the Tax Commission and transferred (less certain administrative fees) monthly to each city or town based on the point of sale or the point of use. Under certain circumstances, municipal energy sales and use taxes may be collected by the energy supplier and distributed directly to the applicable city or town. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020, the City budgeted Municipal Energy Tax revenues of $22,410,000 and the City actually received $21,594,155 of such revenues. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021, the City budgeted Municipal Energy Tax revenues of - 13 - $21,850,000, and the City actually received $__________ of such revenues. The City budgeted Municipal Energy Tax revenues of $__________ for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022; the City is currently projecting Municipal Energy Tax revenues of approximately $__________ for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Telecommunications Taxes. The Municipal Telecommunications License Tax Act, Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 4, Utah Code (the “Municipal Telecommunications Tax Act”), provides that a city or town may levy on and provide that there is collected from a telecommunications provider a municipal telecommunications license tax on the telecommunications provider’s gross receipts that are attributed to such city or town. The gross receipts from a telecommunication service are attributable to a municipality if the gross receipts are for telecommunication service that is located within the municipality. The City collects the Telecommunications Taxes at the maximum legal rate of 3.50%. Telecommunication license taxes, including the Telecommunication Taxes, are collected by the Tax Commission and transferred (less certain administrative fees) monthly to each city or town. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020, the City budgeted Telecommunications Tax revenues of $3,700,000 and the City actually received $3,189,809 of such revenues. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021, the City budgeted Telecommunications Tax revenues of $3,009,500 and the City actually received $__________ of such revenue. The City budgeted Telecommunications Tax revenues of $__________ for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022; the City is currently projecting Telecommunications Tax revenues of approximately $__________ for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Public Utilities Franchise Fees. The City requires the Public Utilities Department of the City to pay the City a franchise fee equal to 6% of the gross revenues received by the department from the operation of the public utility. The purpose of the Public Utilities Franchise Fee is to fairly and equally charge for the department’s use of the City’s streets. The Public Utilities Department collects the Public Utilities Franchise Fee in its billing for water, sewer and stormwater services rendered within City limits. The Public Utilities Franchise Fees collected by the Public Utilities Department are paid to the City’s general fund within 45 days after the close of each month. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020, the City budgeted Public Utilities Franchise Fee revenues of $6,000,000 and the City actually received $6,412,138 of such revenues. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021, the City budgeted Public Utilities Franchise Fee revenues of $6,450,000, and the City actually received $__________ of such revenues. The City budgeted Public Utilities Franchise Fee revenues of $__________ for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022; the City is currently projecting Public Utilities Franchise Fee revenues of approximately $__________ for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Cable Franchise Fees. The City requires that grantees of a cable franchise within the City pay a franchise fee equal to 5% of the gross revenues received from the operation of the cable system. Cable Franchise Fees are calculated on a quarterly basis and are due and payable 90 days - 14 - after the close of the quarter. Any Cable Franchise Fees that have not been paid when due shall bear interest at a rate of 18% per year until paid. The City may request an audit of a grantee’s full billing records. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020, the City budgeted Cable Franchise Fee revenues of $1,400,000 and the City actually received $1,403,469 of such revenues. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021, the City budgeted Cable Franchise Fee revenues of $1,360,000, and the City actually received $__________ of such revenues. The City budgeted Cable Franchise Fee revenues of $__________ for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022; the City is currently projecting Cable Franchise Fee revenues of approximately $__________ for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Unpaid Pledged Sales and Use Taxes. A sales and use tax, including the Pledged Sales and Use Taxes, due and unpaid constitutes a debt due from the vendor and may be collected, together with interest, penalty, and costs, by appropriate judicial proceeding within three years after the vendor is delinquent. Furthermore, if a sales and use tax is not paid when due and if the vendor has not followed the procedures to object to a notice of deficiency, the Tax Commission may issue a warrant directed to the sheriff of any county commanding the sheriff to levy upon and sell the real and personal property of a delinquent taxpayer found within such county for the payment of the tax due. The amount of the warrant shall have the force and effect of an execution against all personal property of the delinquent taxpayer and shall become a lien upon the real property of the delinquent taxpayer in the same manner as a judgment duly rendered by any district court. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022, the City is currently projecting total Pledged Excise Taxes of approximately $__________. HISTORICAL PLEDGED EXCISE TAXES {TO BE UPDATED.} The following table shows the amounts of the various taxes and fees comprising the Pledged Excise Taxes received by the City for the fiscal year indicated. FOR FISCAL YEARS ENDING, 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022* Local Sales Taxes $61,864,444 $64,897,442 $66,363,398 Supplemental Sales Taxes† -- -- -- Municipal Energy Taxes 22,344,092 22,333,347 21,594,155 Telecommunications Taxes 3,939,380 3,599,194 3,189,809 Public Utilities Franchise Fees 5,512,325 5,999,632 6,412,138 Cable Franchise Fees 1,482,352 1,407,613 1,403,469 Total Pledged Excise Taxes $95,142,593 $98,237,228 $98,962,969 Percentage Change from Prior Year 4.62% 3.25% 0.74% ____________________ * Projected. - 15 - † Revenues from the Supplemental Sales Taxes were $28,149,980 and $38,959,231 for the fiscal years ended June 20, 2019 and 2020, respectively, but were not pledged as Revenues at that time. (Source: The City.) STATE PLEDGE OF NONIMPAIRMENT In accordance with Section 11-14-307, Utah Code, the State pledges and agrees with the Holders of the Series 2022_ Bonds that it will not alter, impair or limit the Pledged Excise Taxes in a manner that reduces the amounts to be rebated to the City which are devoted or pledged for the payment of the Series 2022_ Bonds until the Series 2022_ Bonds, together with applicable interest, are fully met and discharged; provided, however, that nothing shall preclude such alteration, impairment or limitation if and when adequate provision shall be made by law for the protection of the Holders of the Series 2022_ Bonds. The City notes that this provision has not been interpreted by a court of law and, therefore, the City cannot predict the extent that such provision would (a) be upheld under constitutional or other legal challenge, (b) protect the current rates and collection of all Pledged Excise Taxes, or (c) impact any other aspect of Pledged Excise Taxes. FLOW OF FUNDS To secure the timely payment of the Principal of and interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds, the City has pledged and assigned to the Trustee the Revenues and all moneys in the funds and accounts (except the Rebate Fund, if any) established by the Indenture. The Indenture establishes a Principal and Interest Fund, to be held by the Trustee and a Revenue Fund to be held by the City and certain other funds and accounts. In general, the Indenture requires that all Revenues be deposited into the Revenue Fund and that the City transfer, on or before the last Business Day of each month, from the Revenue Fund (a) first, the amount, if any, required so that the balance in each of the Series Subaccounts in the Bond Service Account equals the Accrued Debt Service on the related Series of Bonds and (b) second, the amount, if any, required to be deposited into the Series Subaccounts in the Debt Service Reserve Account. Following such deposits, the City is to retain in the Revenue Fund the amount estimated to be required for deposits described in (a) and (b) above in the next succeeding month. Any remaining Revenues may be used by the City, free and clear of the lien of the Indenture. For a more detailed description of application of Revenues under the Indenture see “APPENDIX B – MASTER TRUST INDENTURE – Section 5.05. Revenues; Revenue Fund” and “– Section 5.06. Flow of Funds.” NO DEBT SERVICE RESERVE General. The Indenture requires the establishment of a separate Series Subaccount in the Debt Service Reserve Account for each Series of Bonds, including each of the Series 2022_ Bonds. The Supplemental Indenture relating to each Series of Bonds is required to specify the Debt Service Reserve Requirement for the applicable Series of Bonds that is to be on deposit in the related Series Subaccount. Each Series Subaccount in the Debt Service Reserve Account secures - 16 - only the related Series of Bonds. For more information regarding the Debt Service Reserve Account see “APPENDIX B – MASTER TRUST INDENTURE – Section 5.08. Principal and Interest Fund - Debt Service Reserve Account.” Bonds. Although the Fourteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture creates a Series 2022_ Debt Service Reserve Subaccount, the Series 2022_ Debt Service Reserve Requirement is equal to $-0- . No amounts will be on deposit in the Series 2022_ Debt Service Reserve Subaccount as a reserve for the Series 2022_ Bonds. OUTSTANDING PARITY BONDS When the Series 2022_ Bonds are issued, the Outstanding Parity Bonds will also be outstanding under the Master Indenture in the aggregate principal amount of $__________. The Series 2022_ Bonds, the Outstanding Parity Bonds and any Additional Bonds are equally and ratably secured under the terms of the Master Indenture. ADDITIONAL BONDS Whenever the City determines to issue any Additional Bonds under the Indenture, the following requirements must be met: (a) The City must execute and deliver to the Trustee (among other things) the following documents: (i) a Written Certificate of the City setting forth the Principal amount of the Additional Bonds, the Debt Service for each Fiscal Year of such Additional Bonds and the Aggregate Debt Service for all Outstanding Bonds, including the Additional Bonds being issued; and (ii) a Written Certificate of the City demonstrating (A) in the case of Additional Bonds issued to finance a Project, that the Revenues for any Year within the 24 calendar months next preceding the authentication and delivery of the Additional Bonds proposed to be issued are equal to or greater than 200% of the Maximum Annual Debt Service on all Outstanding Bonds upon the issuance of the Additional Bonds proposed to be issued; or (B) in the case of Additional Bonds issued to refund Bonds issued under the Indenture, either (I) that the Aggregate Debt Service on the Additional Bonds being issued to refund prior Bonds is no greater than 100% of the Aggregate Debt Service on the Bonds being refunded for each Fiscal Year to and including the schedule of final maturity of the Bonds being refunded, or (II) that the Revenues are equal to or greater than 200% of the Maximum Annual Debt Service on all Bonds Outstanding upon the issuance of the refunding Bonds; and (b) The proceeds of Additional Bonds issued under the Indenture must be used to (i) refund Bonds issued under the Indenture or other obligations of the City or its Local - 17 - Building Authority (including the funding of necessary reserves and the payment of costs of issuance) and/or (ii) to finance or refinance a Project. The City may, in determining the Maximum Annual Debt Service on all Outstanding Bonds and in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, reduce the Debt Service on any Series of Bonds for any Fiscal Year by (1) the amount of capitalized interest available to pay interest on such Bonds in such Fiscal Year and (2) the Special Revenues (defined below) pledged to pay such Debt Service in an amount equal to either (x) the average of the Special Revenues received by the City for the past three Fiscal Years or (y) 75% of the Special Revenues received by the City for the immediately preceding Fiscal Year, each as reflected in the applicable audited financial statements of the City filed with the Trustee; provided however, the Special Revenues applied in either (x) or (y) above to reduce the Debt Service on a Series of Bonds for a particular Fiscal Year are not to exceed the Debt Service on such Series of Bonds for said Fiscal Year. “Special Revenues,” as defined in the Master Indenture, means any legally available moneys or income from an enterprise of the City or any other source available to the City that are pledged to the payment of one or more Series of Bonds as provided in a Supplemental Indenture. If Special Revenues are to be used in connection with the determination of Maximum Annual Debt Service, then the City is to deliver to the Trustee (a) confirmation from each Rating Agency then maintaining a rating on any Outstanding Bonds that the pledge of Special Revenues will not result in the reduction or withdrawal of any rating on any Outstanding Bonds and (b) an Opinion of Bond Counsel of nationally recognized standing in the field of law relating to municipal bonds to the effect that such pledge of Special Revenues will not adversely affect the tax-exempt status of any Bonds then Outstanding. No Outstanding Bonds are currently secured by a pledge of Special Revenues. - 18 - DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE ON THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS AND THE OUTSTANDING PARITY BONDS The following table sets forth the debt service requirements on the Series 2022_ Bonds and the Outstanding Parity Bonds: FISCAL YEARS ENDING SERIES 2022_ BONDS OUTSTANDING PARITY TOTAL DEBT JUNE 30 PRINCIPAL* INTEREST BONDS SERVICE 2022 $ $ $7,691,253 2023 7,639,840 2024 7,979,597 2025 8,332,611 2026 8,350,685 2027 8,365,571 2028 8,030,655 2029 8,038,198 2030 5,472,122 2031 5,494,070 2032 11,785,170 2033 11,804,575 2034 10,696,074 2035 10,176,745 2036 8,455,758 2037 8,461,438 2038 8,459,519 TOTAL(1) $ $ $145,233,881 _________________________ (1) Totals may not add due to rounding. Based on the average amount of the Pledged Excise Taxes actually received by the City over the past four fiscal years ($__________), and the anticipated maximum total debt service shown above ($__________), the average amount of the Pledged Excise Taxes received by the City is _____ times the maximum total debt service. See “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS – Pledged Excise Taxes” herein. RISK FACTORS The purchase of the Series 2022_ Bonds involves certain investment risks. Accordingly, each prospective purchaser of the Series 2022_ Bonds should make an independent evaluation of all of the information presented in this Official Statement in order to make an informed investment decision. Certain of these risks are described below; however, it is not intended to be a complete representation of all the possible risks involved. - 19 - UNCERTAINTY OF REVENUES The amount of Pledged Excise Taxes to be collected by the City is dependent on a number of factors beyond the control of either the City or the State, including, but not limited to, current economic conditions and weather patterns. Any one or more of these factors could result in the City receiving less Pledged Excise Tax revenues than anticipated. For example, during periods in which economic activity declines, Local Sales Taxes are likely to decline as compared to an earlier year. In addition, Pledged Excise Taxes are dependent on the volume of the transactions subject to the tax. From time to time, proposals have been made by the Utah State Legislature to remove certain types of purchases from the sales and use taxes or to change the method of distributing the sales and use taxes. See “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS —State Pledge of Nonimpairment” above. In addition, the State (like many other states) has recognized the potential reduction in sales tax revenues as a result of purchases made through the internet and other non- traditional means. The City cannot predict what impact these items may have on the Pledged Excise Taxes it receives. THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS ARE LIMITED OBLIGATIONS The Series 2022_ Bonds are special limited obligations of the City, payable solely from the Revenues, moneys, securities and funds pledged therefor in the Indenture. The Series 2022_ Bonds do not constitute general obligation indebtedness or a pledge of the ad valorem taxing power or the full faith and credit of the City, and are not obligations of the State or any other agency or other political subdivision or entity of the State. The City will not mortgage or grant any security interest in the improvements refinanced with the proceeds of the Series 2022_ Bonds or any portion thereof to secure payment of the Series 2022_ Bonds. LIMITATION ON INCREASING RATES FOR PLEDGED EXCISE TAXES The City currently either levies the maximum tax rate (taking into account any credit for franchise fees) allowed under State law for all component taxes making up the Pledged Excise Taxes or is limited by contract and by State law in its ability to increase franchise fees. No assurance can be given that the Pledged Excise Taxes will remain sufficient for the payment of the Principal or interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds and the City is limited by State law in its ability to increase the rate of such Pledged Excise Taxes. POSSIBLE USE OF SPECIAL REVENUES TO MEET ADDITIONAL BONDS TEST; RELIANCE ON RATING AGENCIES In determining the Maximum Annual Debt Service for purposes of meeting the coverage requirements under the Indenture in order to issue Additional Bonds, the City, at its option, may apply Special Revenues up to a certain amount as an assumed reduction in Debt Service on an Outstanding Series of Bonds. See “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS – Additional Bonds” herein. As a condition (among others) to including Special Revenues for this purpose, each Rating Agency then maintaining a rating on any Outstanding Bonds must confirm the rating on the Outstanding Bonds. Owners of the Series 2022_ Bonds will be relying on Rating Agencies’ - 20 - approval with respect to the inclusion by the City of Special Revenues in the determination of Maximum Annual Debt Service with respect to any future Additional Bonds, if such Special Revenues are pledged to such Bonds. Additionally, the inclusion of Special Revenues could potentially dilute the coverage ratio of Pledged Revenues to Maximum Annual Debt Service. The City currently has no plans to apply Special Revenues for a Series of Bonds. POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE CORONAVIRUS The outbreak of COVID-19 and its spread has been designated a global pandemic by the World Health Organization and an emergency by federal and state governments. Since the start of the pandemic, Presidential administrations, Congress, and other federal agencies as well as states and local governmental units, including the City and the State, have enacted legislation and/or issued orders or directives (collectively, “Governmental Actions”) to alleviate the effects of COVID-19. Financial markets, including the stock markets in the United States and globally, have seen volatility and declines that have been attributed to COVID-19 concerns. The Governmental Actions, and other future federal, state, and local measures may have both adverse and positive effects on the City and the Revenues. In addition, unemployment in the State, business closures and/or restrictions in the State and market fluctuation during the pandemic may have an adverse effect on the City or the Revenues. The City continues to review the possible impacts of these various actions and events. The City cannot predict (a) the duration or extent of the COVID-19 pandemic or any other outbreak emergency; (b) whether and to what extent the COVID-19 pandemic or other outbreak or emergency may disrupt the local or global economy, manufacturing, or supply chain, or whether any such disruption may adversely impact the City or the Revenues; or (c) the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the City, or whether any such effect may adversely impact the City or the Revenues. The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting business and market disruptions may have an adverse impact on the City or the Revenues to an extent that may be material. See “RECENT DEVELOPMENTS–COVID-19” for additional information. CLIMATE CHANGE Climate change caused by human activities may have adverse effects on the City. As greenhouse gas emissions continue to accumulate in the atmosphere as a result of economic activity, climate change is expected to intensify, increasing the frequency, severity and timing of extreme weather events such as coastal storm surges, drought, wildfires, floods and heat waves, and raising sea levels. The future fiscal impact of climate change on the City is difficult to predict, but it could be significant and it could have a material adverse effect on the City’s finances by requiring greater expenditures to counteract the effects of climate change or by changing the business and activities of City residents. The City considers the potential effects of climate change in its planning. - 21 - CYBERSECURITY The risk of cyberattacks against commercial enterprises, including those operated for a governmental purpose, has become more prevalent in recent years. At least one of the rating agencies factors the risk of such an attack into its ratings analysis, recognizing that a cyberattack could affect liquidity, public policy and constituent confidence, and ultimately credit quality. A cyberattack could cause the informational systems of the City to be compromised and could limit operational capacity, for short or extended lengths of time and could bring about the release of sensitive and private information. Additionally, other potential negative consequences include data loss or compromise, diversion of resources to prevent future incidences and reputational damage. To date, the City has not been the subject of a successful cyberattack. The City believes it has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that any such attack is not successful and that the information systems of the City are secure. However, there can be no assurance that a cyberattack will not occur in a manner resulting in damage to the City’s information systems or other challenges. The City has insurance coverage for cyber liability. See “THE CITY–Insurance Coverage” herein. THE CITY {TO BE UPDATED BY THE CITY.} CITY OFFICIALS The City has a Council-Mayor form of government. The City Council consists of seven members, who are elected by voters within seven geographic districts of approximately equal population. The Mayor is elected at large by the voters of the City and is charged with the executive and administrative duties of the government. The seven-member, part-time City Council is charged with the responsibility of performing the legislative functions of the City. The City Council performs three primary functions: it passes laws for the City, adopts the City budget and provides administrative oversight by conducting management and operational audits of City departments. Term information concerning the Mayor and the members of the City Council is set forth below: - 22 - OFFICE DISTRICT PERSON YEARS IN SERVICE EXPIRATION OF CURRENT TERM Mayor — Erin J. Mendenhall 1* January 2024 Council Chair #6 Daniel Dugan 1 January 2024 Council Vice Chair #5 Darin Mano 1 January 2026 Council Member #7 Amy Fowler 3 January 2026 Council Member #1 Victoria Petro-Eschler 0 January 2026 Council Member #2 Alejandro Puy 0 January 2024 Council Member #4 Analia Valdemoros 2 January 2024 Council Member #3 Chris Wharton 3 January 2026 ____________________ * Mayor Mendenhall previously served 6 years as a council member before being elected mayor. CITY ADMINISTRATION The offices of Chief of Staff, City Attorney, City Recorder and City Treasurer are appointive offices. Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff, before becoming Mayor Mendenhall’s chief of staff in November 2019, worked as Government Relations Director for the Utah League of Cities and Towns. In that capacity, she developed policy and advocated for local government at the Utah State Legislature. Rachel, trained as an attorney, also served as a deputy city attorney for West Jordan, assistant city attorney for South Jordan, and worked in private practice for several years after graduating from the University of Utah’s College of Law in 2008. Katherine N. Lewis, City Attorney, was appointed as the Salt Lake City Attorney in January 2020. Ms. Lewis received her law degree from the University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law in 2007 and received her undergraduate degree from Colorado State University in 2001. Ms. Lewis was a Senior City Attorney in the Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office from 2013-2020 prior to being appointed the City Attorney. She worked in private practice at Parsons Behle & Latimer prior to joining the Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office. Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder, was appointed on June 3, 2020. Prior to this position, Ms. Trishman was employed by the Salt Lake City Council. Her duties included team management, inauguration and transition of newly elected officials, elected official vacancy coordination, enhancing government transparency efforts and building process improvements. Ms. Trishman holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business and English. Marina Scott, City Treasurer, was appointed to her position on June 4, 2013. From December 2006 until her appointment, Ms. Scott was Deputy Treasurer for the City; and from September 2005 until December 2006 she served as an Accountant III for the Public Services Department. Ms. Scott holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting, and a Master of Professional Accountancy from Weber State University. She also holds a Master of Arts in Library and Information Science from Vilnius State University. - 23 - CITY FUND STRUCTURE; ACCOUNTING BASIS The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds, each of which is considered to be a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for by providing a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund balance or net assets, revenues, and expenditures or expenses. The various funds are grouped by type in the basic financial statements. Revenues and expenditures are recognized using the modified accrual basis of accounting in all governmental funds. Revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become both measurable and available. “Measurable” means that amounts can be reasonably determined within the current period. “Available” means that amounts are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. The City uses 60 days as a cutoff for meeting the available criterion. Property taxes are considered “measurable” when levied and available when collected and held by Salt Lake County. Any amounts not available are recorded as deferred revenue. Franchise taxes are considered “measurable” when collected and held by the utility company, and are recognized as revenue at that time. Other revenues that are determined to be susceptible to accrual include grants-in-aid earned and other intergovernmental revenues, charges for services, interest, assessments, interfund service charges, and proceeds of the sale of property. Property taxes and assessments are recorded as receivables when assessed; however, they are reported as deferred revenue until the “available” criterion has been met. Sales and use taxes collected by the State and remitted to the City within the “available” time period are recognized as revenue. Revenues collected in advance are deferred and recognized in the period to which they apply. In proprietary funds, revenues and expenses are recognized using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they are earned and become measurable and expenses are recognized in the period incurred. FINANCIAL CONTROLS The City utilizes a computerized financial accounting system which includes a system of budgetary controls. State law requires budgets to be controlled by individual departments, but the City also maintains computerized control by major categories within departments. These computerized controls are such that a requisition cannot be entered into the purchasing system unless the appropriated funds are available. The system checks for sufficient funds again, prior to the purchase order being issued, and again before the payment check is issued. Voucher payments are also controlled by the computer for sufficient appropriations. BUDGET AND APPROPRIATION PROCESS The budget and appropriation process of the City is governed by the Uniform Fiscal Procedures Act for Utah Cities, Title 10, Chapter 6, of the Utah Code (the “Fiscal Procedures Act”). Pursuant to the Fiscal Procedures Act, the budget officer of the City is required to prepare budgets for the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds and Capital Improvement Fund. These budgets are to provide a complete financial plan for the budget (ensuing - 24 - fiscal) year. Each budget is required to specify, in tabular form, estimates of anticipated revenues and appropriations for expenditures. Under the Fiscal Procedures Act, the total of anticipated revenues must equal the total of appropriated expenditures. On or before the first regular meeting of the City Council in May of each year, the budget officer is required to submit to the City Council tentative budgets for all funds for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1. Various actual and estimated budget data are required to be set forth in the tentative budgets. The budget officer may revise the budget request submitted by the heads of City departments, but must file these submissions with the City Council together with the tentative budget. The budget officer is required to estimate in the tentative budget the revenue from nonproperty tax sources available for each fund and the revenue from general property taxes required by each fund. The tentative budget is then provisionally adopted by the City Council, with any amendments or revisions that the City Council deems advisable prior to the public hearings on the tentative budget. After public notice and hearing, the tentative budget is adopted by the City Council, subject to further amendment or revisions by the City Council prior to adoption of the final budget. Prior to June 30th of each year, the final budgets for all funds are adopted by the City Council. The Fiscal Procedures Act prohibits the City Council from making any appropriation in the final budget of any fund in excess of the estimated expendable revenue of such fund. The adopted final budget is subject to amendment by the City Council during the Fiscal Year. However, in order to increase the budget total of any fund, public notice and hearing must be provided. Intra- and inter-department transfers of appropriation balances are permitted upon compliance with the Fiscal Procedures Act. The amount set forth in the final budget as the total amount of estimated revenue from property taxes constitutes the basis for determining the property tax levy to be set by the City Council for the succeeding tax year. INSURANCE COVERAGE (TO BE UPDATED BY THE CITY.} The City is largely self-insured for general liability exposures, except for liability incurred on premises owned, rented, or occupied by the Department of Airports (the “Airport”). The City carries commercial excess liability insurance with $1,000,000 self-insured retention per occurrence. Limits of coverage are as follows: $2,000,000 per occurrence general liability; $2,000,000 combined single limit commercial auto liability; $2,000,000 public officials and employment practices liability; and $2,000,000 law enforcement liability. General liability carries a $4,000,000 aggregate limit; other lines each carry a $2,000,000 aggregate limit. The City also carries cyber liability insurance. The Airport carries commercial general liability insurance with a $500,000,000 policy limit and no deductible. The Governmental Immunity Fund (an internal service fund) has been established to pay liability claims other than those covered by the Airport policy, along with certain litigation expenses. The City carries an all risk property insurance policy (the “Policy”) with a $500,000,000 aggregate limit and a $100,000 deductible, except for earthquake, which carries a 1% deductible per location; and flood, which carries a $250,000 or $500,000 deductible, depending on location. - 25 - Sub-limits include: (1) earthquake limit of $125,000,000 aggregate; (2) flood limit of $100,000,000 aggregate; and (3) dams and appurtenant structures limit of $30,000,000 aggregate except for Mountain Dell, which carries a $60,000,000 aggregate limit. (4) Business interruption and extra expense are covered at $10,000,000. (5) Terrorism loss is covered at $5,000,000. The City is self-insured for property loss above the limits and below the deductibles. The operating departments of the General Fund or proprietary funds assume financial responsibility for risk retained by the City for property damage. The Airport is covered by a separate all risk property insurance policy with a $1,000,000,000 limit, subject to sub-limits and a $100,000 deductible. Locations covered include Salt Lake City International Airport, South Valley Regional Airport, and Tooele Valley Airport. Boiler and machinery carry a deductible of $100,000. Flood carries a sub-limit of $150,000,000 and Earth movement carries sub-limit of $100,000,000 with a 1% deductible per unit, subject to a $100,000 minimum and $5,000,000 maximum in any one occurrence. Windstorm or hail carries a $1,000,000,000 limit, subject to a minimum $100,000 deductible per occurrence. Time element including business interruption, extra expense, rental value, and rental income is covered at $200,000,000 with a $100,000 deductible. Sub-limits apply for debris removal ($25,000,000), valuable papers and records ($25,000,000), errors and omissions ($10,000,000), and named storm ($1,000,000,000). The Treasurer, Deputy Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer are each covered under $10,000,000 public official bonds. The City also has a government crime policy covering (1) employee theft with a $1,000,000 limit and $20,000 deductible; (2) forgery or alteration with a $25,000 limit and $1,000 deductible; (3) theft of money and securities with a $50,000 limit and $2,500 deductible; (4) robbery or safe burglary with a $50,000 limit and $2,500 deductible; (5) money orders and counterfeit money with a $50,000 limit and $2,500 deductible; and (6) computer fraud and funds transfer fraud, each carrying $1,000,000 limits and $20,000 deductibles. The City purchases excess workers’ compensation insurance with a $30,000,000 limit and $1,000,000 self-insured retention per occurrence. The City is self-insured for losses above the limits and below the deductibles. Further, the City is self-insured for unemployment. The Risk Management Fund (an internal service fund) has been established to pay these claims along with health insurance premiums and certain administrative expenses. During the past three fiscal years, there have been no settlements that exceeded the self-insured retentions. See “APPENDIX A – SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021 – Notes to Financial Statements – Note 11 – Risk Management.” INVESTMENT POLICY City Policy. It is the policy of the City to invest public funds in accordance with the principles of sound treasury management and in compliance with State and local laws, regulations, and other policies governing the investment of public funds, specifically, according to the terms and conditions of the State Money Management Act of 1974 and Rules of the State Money Management Council as currently amended (the “Money Management Act”), and the City’s own - 26 - written investment policy. The following investment objectives, in order of priority, are met when investing public funds: safety of principal, need for liquidity, and maximum yield on investments consistent with the first two objectives. The City may use investment advisers to conduct investment transactions on its behalf as permitted by the Money Management Act and local ordinance or policy. Investment advisers must be certified by the Director of the Utah State Division of Securities of the Department of Commerce (the “Director”). Broker/dealers and agents who desire to become certified dealers must be certified by the Director and meet the requirements of the Money Management Act. Only qualified depositories as certified by Utah’s Commissioner of Financial Institutions are eligible to receive and hold deposits of public funds. The State Money Management Council issues a quarterly list of certified investment advisers, certified dealers, and qualified depositories authorized by State statute to conduct transactions with public treasurers. Transactions involving authorized deposits or investments of public funds may be conducted only through issuers of securities authorized by Section 51-7-11(3) of the Utah Code, qualified depositories included in the current State list, and certified dealers included in the current State list. The City Treasurer must take delivery of all investments purchased, including those purchased through a certified investment adviser. This may be accomplished by the City Treasurer taking physical delivery of the security or delivering the security to a bank or trust company designated by the City Treasurer for safekeeping. The City Treasurer may use a qualified depository bank for safekeeping securities or maintain an account with a money center bank for the purpose of settling investment transactions and safekeeping and collecting those investments. City policy provides that not more than 25% of total City funds or 25% of the qualified depository’s allotment, whichever is less, can be invested in any one qualified depository. Not more than 20% of total City funds may be invested in any one certified out-of-state depository institution. However, there is no limitation placed on the amount invested with the Utah Public Treasurer’s Investment Fund (“PTIF”) and other money market mutual funds, provided that the overall standards of investments achieve the City’s policy objectives. All funds pledged or otherwise dedicated to the payment of interest on and principal of bonds or notes issued by the City are invested in accordance with the terms and borrowing instruments applicable to such bonds or notes. City policy also provides that the remaining term to maturity of an investment may not exceed the period of availability of the funds invested. The investment of City funds cannot be of a speculative nature. The City’s entire portfolio is currently in compliance with all of the provisions of the Money Management Act. The Utah Public Treasurers’ Investment Fund. The PTIF is a local government investment fund, established in 1981, and managed by the State Treasurer. Currently the City has approximately $1.5 billion on deposit in the PTIF, representing a substantial portion of the City’s funds. All investments in the PTIF must comply with the Money Management Act and rules of the State Money Management Council. The PTIF invests primarily in money market securities. Securities in the PTIF include certificates of deposit, commercial paper, short-term corporate notes, obligations of the U.S. Treasury and securities of certain agencies of the federal - 27 - government. By policy, the maximum weighted average adjusted life of the portfolio is not to exceed 90 days and the maximum final maturity of any security purchased by the PTIF is limited to five years. Safekeeping and audit controls for all investments owned by the PTIF must comply with the Money Management Act. All securities purchased are delivered versus payment to the custody of the State Treasurer or the State Treasurer’s safekeeping bank, assuring a perfected interest in the securities. Securities owned by the PTIF are completely segregated from securities owned by the State. The State has no claim on assets owned by the PTIF except for any investment of State moneys in the PTIF. Deposits are not insured or otherwise guaranteed by the State. Investment activity of the State Treasurer in the management of the PTIF is reviewed monthly by the State Money Management Council and is audited by the State Auditor. The information in this section concerning the current status of the PTIF has been obtained from sources the City believes to be reliable, but the City takes no responsibility for the accuracy thereof. See “APPENDIX A – SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021 – Notes to the Financial Statements – Note 2 – Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments” below. EMPLOYEE WORKFORCE AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM; POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS Employee Workforce and Retirement System. The City currently employs approximately 3,050 full-time employees and approximately 240 hourly and part-time employees for a total employment of approximately 3,290 employees. The City participates in three cost-sharing multiple-employer public employee retirement systems and one multiple-employer agent system which are defined benefit retirement plans covering public employees of the State and employees of participating local governmental entities (the “Systems”). The Systems are administered under the direction of the Utah State Retirement Board whose members are appointed by the Governor of the State. See “APPENDIX B – SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021 – Notes to Financial Statements – Note 6 – Long-Term Obligations,” “– Note 12 – Pension Plans” and “– Note 13 – Defined Contribution Savings Plans.” Retirement Liability. The City participates with the Utah Retirement System (“URS”). URS is funded and administered by the State. Each year, as approved by the State Legislature, URS sets rates, enacts rules, and implements policies related to the pensions and benefits the City retirees receive. Starting in Fiscal Year 2015, GASB Statement Number 68 requires URS to pass on pension and retirement liability to public entities it serves, including the City. Working with the City’s independent auditors and State specialists, this liability has been recorded on the City’s financial statements for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2021 in the amount of $65,378,582. No Other Post-Employment Benefits. The City does not offer other post-employment benefits. - 28 - (The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.) - 29 - DEBT STRUCTURE For purposes of the information set forth under this section under the heading entitled “Outstanding Debt Issues” the Series 2022_ Bonds are considered issued and outstanding. OUTSTANDING DEBT ISSUES (EXPECTED AS OF CLOSING DATE OF THE SERIES 2022_ BONDS) (1) {TO BE UPDATED.} AMOUNT OF ORIGINAL ISSUE FINAL MATURITY DATE PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING General Obligation Bonds: Series 2010B (Public Safety Facilities) $100,000,000 6/15/2031 $ 54,650,000 Series 2013 (Refunded a portion of Series 2004A) 6,395,000 6/15/2024 2,115,000 Series 2015A Refunding (Taxable Sports Complex) 14,615,000 6/15/2028 7,825,000 Series 2015B Refunding (Open Space) 4,095,000 6/15/2023 630,000 Series 2017B Refunding (Refunded portion of Series 2010A) 12,920,000 6/15/2030 11,875,000 Series 2019 Improvement and Refunding (Refunded a portion of Series 2017A) 22,840,000 6/15/2039 16,300,000 Series 2020 (Streets) 17,745,000 6/15/2040 13,130,000 Series 2021 (Streets) 20,660,000 6/15/2041 20,660,000 Total $127,185,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds: Series 2009 (Taxable) $ 6,300,000 2/1/2031 $ 3,150,000 Series 2010 Revenue Bonds 12,000,000 2/1/2031 6,545,000 Series 2011 Revenue Bonds 8,000,000 2/1/2027 3,300,000 Series 2012 Improvement and Refunding Bonds 28,565,000 2/1/2027 8,865000 Series 2017 Improvement and Refunding Bonds 72,185,000 2/1/2037 66,145,000 Series 2020 Improvement Bonds 157,390,000 2/1/2050 157,390,000 Series 2020B Improvement Bonds (WIFIA loan) (2) 348,635,000 8/1/2058 348,635,000 Total $594,030,000 Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds: Series 2013B 7,315,000 10/1/2023 690,000 Series 2014B 10,935,000 10/1/2034 7,955,000 Series 2016A 21,715,000 10/1/2028 15,920,000 Series 2019A 2,620,000 4/1/2027 2,095,000 Series 2019B (Federally Taxable) 58,540,000 4/1/2038 57,740,000 Series 2021 (Federally Taxable) 15,045,000 10/1/2034 15,045,000 Series 2022A 8,900,000 10/1/2032 8,900,000 Series 2022_ [(Federally Taxable)](3) __________* 10/1/203_ * Total $ * Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue Bonds: Series 2014 $8,800,000 4/1/2024 $ 2,820,000 Airport Revenue Bonds: Series 2017A $826,210,000 7/1/2047 $ 825,105,000 Series 2017B 173,790,000 7/1/2047 173,755,000 Series 2018A 753,855,000 7/1/2048 753,855,000 Series 2018B 96,695,000 7/1/2048 96,695,000 Series 2021A 776,925,000 7/1/2051 776,925,000 Series 2021B 127,645,000 7/1/2051 127,645,000 Total $2,753,980,000 Local Building Authority Lease Revenue Bonds(4): Series 2013A $7,180,000 10/15/2023 $ 650,000 Series 2014A 7,095,000 4/15/2023 605,000 Series 2016A 6,755,000 4/15/2037 5,755,000 Series 2017A 8,115,000 4/15/2038 7,555,000 Total $14,565,000 ______________________________ (1) The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, a separate entity, has issued bonds, but such bonds are not obligations of the City and are therefore not included in this table. See “APPENDIX B—SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021—Notes to the Financial Statements—Note 6–Long-Term Obligations.” (2) Closed September 15, 2020. The Series 2020B Bonds are a drawdown loan in the maximum principal amount of $348,635,000. Draws will be made over the next 5 years, but no draws have currently been made. The initial interest payment is on February 1, 2029 and the initial principal payment is on August 1, 2029. (3) Expected to close __________, 2022. (4) The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City is a separate entity. Lease Revenue Bonds are not obligations of the City, but are paid from annually appropriated rental payments made by the City. - 30 - FUTURE DEBT PLANS {TO BE UPDATED BY THE CITY.} The City is considering issuing Additional Bonds to pay for various capital improvement projects. The par amount is estimated at $58 million. A special bond election held on November 6, 2018 gave voter authorization to the City to issue up to $87 million in general obligation bonds to fund all or a portion of the costs of improving various streets and roads throughout the City and related infrastructure improvements. The City currently has approximately $31,055,000 of authorized, but unissued, bonds from the November 6, 2018 voted authorization, which the City anticipates issuing within the next 5-6 years. The City will issue approximately $506 million in additional general airport revenue bonds in the future to complete the $4.45 billion airport reconstruction program. The reconstruction program is currently expected to be completed by 2024. The City applied for a $7,000,000 infrastructure loan to finance a portion of the cost of a neighborhood parking structure through a revolving fund called the Utah State Infrastructure Bank Fund. The loan will bear interest of 1.96%, and the term is 15 years. To secure the repayment of the loan, the City will pledge the funds allocated by the State of Utah, by HB 244 (First Class County Highway Road Funds). Public utilities revenue bonds of approximately $503 million are expected to be issued over the next seven years to fund the Department of Public Utilities capital improvement program. A major focus of the Department’s budget is the rehabilitation and replacement of aging infrastructure. The largest planned projects are the new water reclamation facility to meet regulatory requirements, improvements to three water treatment plants, phased construction of a new water conveyance line to expand service and provide redundancy, and water, sewer and storm water utility infrastructure work necessitated by street improvements projects pursuant to the City’s passage of the general obligation bond for that purpose. The Department will also be utilizing proceeds from a $348,635,000 Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan secured to finance the construction of the water reclamation facility. The loan will be drawn through 2024. The City analyzes the potential value of refunding bond issues, particularly during periods of lower than normal interest rates or on an as needed basis and may issue refunding bonds at such times. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS {TO BE UPDATED BY THE CITY.} General. Fiscal year 2021 general fund expenses are expected to end very close to budget. Due to COVID-19 and the September 2020 Windstorm there have been unusual and unexpected changes in spending. The administration and council have provided additional emergency funding, and it is expected that these departments will be very close to budget on June 30, 2021. Overall revenue for fiscal year 2021 is projected to be $9.0 million over budget. Permit and License revenue is expected to be higher than budgeted due to increases in construction related - 31 - permitting. Total sales tax revenues are approximately $8.0 million over budget. Fines & Forfeitures, Parking Meter Revenue and Miscellaneous Revenue are all under budget due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Fund balance for the end of fiscal year 2020 was $67.2 million or 20.85% of total revenues for the year. The City Council and administration have an internal goal to keep the fund balance above 14% of total revenue for each fiscal year. In fiscal year 2019 the total fund balance was $43.5 million (16.0%) and a conservative fund balance estimate for fiscal year 2021 is $47.5 million (14.5%). Fiscal year 2021 budget grew by approximately 10%, an increase of $28.4, million as compared to the previous year. Major general fund expense increases were $5.7 million mostly associated with salary and benefit cost increases, 66 new positions at a budgeted cost of $3.4 million, a transfer of 68 police officers from the Salt Lake City International Airport at a cost of $7.7 million funded by the Airport, $4.7 million of transportation initiatives funded through a new sales tax and an increase in the transfer to the fleet fund of just over $4.3 million. COVID-19. As the regional employment center, tourism destination, and entertainment hub for the State of Utah, Salt Lake City has experienced a significant loss of revenues in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. General fund estimated losses through Dec 31, 2020 exceed $48 million. The fiscal year 2021 general fund put into place some reduction strategies, which include a hiring freeze for six months, while the rest of the general fund’s expenditure budget remained flat. The City’s administration took a conservative approach on the revenues projected with some of the major sources being decreased by 15% for 6 months of fiscal year 2021. The City has incurred an estimated $6.5 million in unbudgeted local expenses in response to this crisis. The City has received $12,001,476 million from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act funding allocated to the State and/or County and will receive an additional installments of CARES funding in Fall of 2021. The City has also received $7,987,257 in Rental Assistance and $42,705,786 (first 50% installment) from The American Rescue Plan. September 2020 Windstorm. On Sept 8, 2020 Salt Lake City experienced hurricane force winds which caused thousands of trees and limbs to fall, causing property damage, power outages and road and business closures. Downed trees blocked critical emergency routes throughout the city as well as many thoroughfares preventing first responder access and critical daily residential refuse collection. The windstorm created a state of local emergency under Utah Code and City Code. With the help of the National Guard, State, County, and local jurisdictions, and volunteer organizations, Salt Lake City removed and disposed of over 9,000 tons of debris. The current estimate of losses from the windstorm exceeds $8 million. This projection could change as we continue to clean up and repair damaged buildings, sidewalks, and irrigation systems. - 32 - It currently appears that some windstorm related damages will be covered by the city’s property insurance less a $100,000 deductible. The City is seeking FEMA Public Assistance to help with the uninsured and underinsured damages. See also “INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS–Potential Impact of the Coronavirus” below. FINANCIAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE CITY FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY The summaries contained herein were extracted from the City’s financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 through June 30, 2021. The summaries are unaudited. See also “APPENDIX A – SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021.” (The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.) - 33 - SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, UTAH STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE — GENERAL FUND (FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30) Unaudited Revenues And Expenditures 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 Revenues: General property tax $113,495,125 $112,588,053 $104,938,706 $101,731,444 $100,322,860 Sales, use and excise taxes 122,654,953 116,199,002 99,403,846 67,940,454 62,776,248 Franchise taxes 23,952,168 26,863,146 27,238,435 27,286,331 28,418,423 Licenses 11,418,021 13,106,709 16,448,180 15,592,788 15,194,896 Permits 25,004,393 19,490,500 20,417,302 15,015,980 19,792,317 Fines and forfeitures 1,837,591 2,567,145 3,316,215 3,457,569 3,524,067 Interest 1,141,861 2,996,417 4,604,973 2,263,772 805,997 Intergovernmental 4,781,753 5,086,254 6,006,496 5,791,774 6,855,998 Interfund service charges 20,971,348 20,574,064 16,363,849 11,413,982 11,450,521 Parking meter collections 1,915,888 2,771,331 3,509,898 3,404,582 3,463,592 Parking tickets 1,701,881 1,186,561 1,824,561 2,110,245 3,204,769 Rental and other income 816,715 760,012 4,618,165 916,512 1,035,637 Charges for services 4,026,186 3,523,747 955,516 4,755,198 4,323,241 Miscellaneous 2,800,718 4,554,707 5,308,035 6,025,249 5,398,235 Total Revenues 336,518,601 332,267,648 314,954,177 267,705,880 266,566,801 Expenditures: City Council 3,910,937 3,759,472 3,573,889 3,137,125 3,201,795 Mayor 3,495,653 3,862,232 3,121,458 2,856,010 2,752,337 City Attorney 6,840,902 6,788,279 6,643,806 5,896,933 5,549,139 Finance 7,872,632 7,827,573 7,596,941 6,758,236 6,645,796 Fire 40,360,501 42,336,507 42,266,968 39,165,845 38,251,674 Combined Emergency Services 7,557,911 7,953,949 8,066,766 7,377,133 6,861,592 Police 80,751,205 82,368,338 74,956,306 66,609,711 64,158,367 Community and Neighborhoods 23,616,595 23,407,408 22,291,042 21,409,611 19,903,151 Economic Development 2,243,608 1,985,238 1,689,398 1,650,691 1,190,020 Justice Court 4,340,743 4,428,065 4,389,467 4,276,010 4,183,738 Human Resources 2,576,008 2,663,132 2,614,565 2,524,603 2,330,599 Public Services 44,240,773 44,472,172 45,525,224 42,344,796 41,871,303 Nondepartmental 37,572,779 35,162,898 29,585,365 27,602,288 26,450,242 Interest and other fiscal charges - - 675,866 583,117 371,509 Total Expenditures 265,380,247 267,015,263 252,997,061 232,192,109 223,721,262 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 71,138,354 65,252,385 61,957,116 35,513,771 42,845,539 Other Financing Sources (Uses): Proceeds from sale of property 38,996 6,484 43,697 9,756 47,703 Transfers in 8,447,676 6,800,493 7,564,419 8,345,810 7,307,161 Transfers out (52,581,232) (62,631,195) (45,855,553) (38,436,099) (40,621,305) Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (44,094,560) (55,824,218) (38,247,437) (30,080,533) (33,266,441) Net Change in Fund Balances 27,043,794 9,428,167 23,709,740 5,433,238 9,579,098 Fund Balance Prior Year (July 1) 89,242,176 79,814,009 56,104,269 50,670,995 41,091,897 Fund Balance Year End (June 30) $116,285,970 $89,242,176 $79,814,009 $56,104,269 $50,670,995 (Source: The City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report or Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the indicated years. This summary has not been audited.) - 34 - SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, UTAH BALANCE SHEET — GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS — GENERAL FUND (FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30) Unaudited 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents: Unrestricted $102,997,255 $ 81,186,718 $ 66,930,200 $ 49,087,093 $ 41,534,741 Restricted 1,445,291 1,479,040 1,214,680 119,303 794,556 Receivables Property, franchise and excise 136,947,857 125,990,575 121,146,223 109,657,724 109,140,970 Accounts Receivable* 680,170 410,798 585,327 754,799 1,529,553 Taxes Receivable 4,643,313 6,508,528 9,637,005 7,282,610 7,687,027 Current portion of loans receivables 78,027 91,228 105,658 719,155 143,258 Other, principally accrued interest 4,091 - 3,595 4,048 3,948 Prepaids 2,212,414 2,295,517 2,222,173 2,108,725 2,067,816 Noncurrent assets: Restricted cash and cash equivalents - - - - 457,090 Total Assets 249,008,418 217,962,404 201,844,861 169,733,457 163,358,959 LIABILITIES Accounts payable 5,313,254 4,422,547 3,804,768 3,947,162 3,834,497 Accrued liabilities 14,406,745 12,859,977 11,173,580 10,428,440 8,892,089 Due to other funds for cash overdraft - - - 2,033,955 - Current deposits and advance rentals 4,005,053 4,478,386 5,016,747 1,823,210 2,702,137 Current portion of long-term compensated absences 2,705,850 1,975,363 2,243,741 179,411 58,476 Total liabilities 26,430,902 23,736,273 22,238,836 18,412,178 15,487,199 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Receivables not meeting available criterion 106,291,546 104,983,955 99,792,016 95,217,010 97,200,765 Total deferred inflows 106,291,546 104,983,955 99,792,016 95,217,010 97,200,765 FUND BALANCES Nonspendable 2,212,414 9,302,914 12,550,163 10,865,289 11,427,654 Restricted 12,139,443 - - - - Assigned - 9,899,196 15,891,696 8,731,775 7,298,041 Unassigned 101,934,113 70,040,066 51,372,150 36,507,205 31,945,300 Total fund balances 116,285,970 89,242,176 79,814,009 56,104,269 50,670,995 Total Liabilities and Fund Balances $249,008,418 $217,962,404 $201,844,861 $169,733,457 $163,358,959 * Less allowance for 2017 of $78,000. (Source: The City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report or Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the indicated years. The summary above has not been audited.) - 35 - Set forth below are brief descriptions of the various sources of revenues available to the City’s general fund. The percentage of total general fund revenues represented by each source is based on the City’s audited June 30, 2021 fiscal year period: Sales, use and excise taxes – Approximately 36.91% of general fund revenues are from sales, use and excise taxes. General property taxes – Approximately 34.16% of general fund revenues are from general property taxes. Licenses and Permits – Approximately 10.96% of general fund revenues are from licenses and permits. Franchise taxes – Approximately 7.21% of general fund revenues are from franchise taxes. Interfund service charges – Approximately 6.31% of general fund revenues are from interfund service charges. Intergovernmental – Approximately 1.44% of general fund revenues are from other governmental entities. Charges for Services – Approximately 1.21% of general fund revenues are from charges for services. Miscellaneous – Approximately 0.84% of general fund revenues are from miscellaneous revenues. Parking meter – Approximately 0.58% of general fund revenues are from parking meters. Fines and forfeitures – Approximately 0.55% of general fund revenues are from fines and forfeitures. Parking tickets – Approximately 0.51% of general fund revenues are from parking tickets. Interest – Approximately 0.34% of general fund revenues are from interest income. Rental and other income – Approximately 0.25% of general fund revenues are from rental and other income. - 36 - ASSESSED TAXABLE AND ESTIMATED FAIR MARKET VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY (YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 THROUGH 2021)(1) 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 Assessed Taxable value (2) $34,767,046 $31,537,761 $28,398,219 $25,664,463 $23,932,708 Estimated fair market value 45,901,482 41,493,433 37,255,666 33,819,886 31,386,040 Ratio of assessed taxable value to estimated fair market value 75.7% 76.0% 76.2% 75.9% 76.3% _________________________ (1) Dollar amounts are in thousands. (2) Note: All taxable property is assessed and taxed on the basis of its fair market value. State law requires that the fair market value of property that is assessed by county assessors using a comparable sales or a cost appraisal method exclude expenses related to property sales transactions. For tax purposes, the fair market value of primary residential property is reduced by 45% under current law. (Source: Salt Lake City Corporation Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, Statistical Section, year ended June 30, 2021.) PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAXPAYERS TAXPAYER TYPE OF BUSINESS 2020 TAXABLE VALUE(1) % OF THE CITY’S 2020 TAXABLE VALUE LDS Church (Property Reserve, City Creek Reserve, Deseret Title) Real Estate Holding $1,066,641,878 3.38% PacifiCorp Electric Utility 545,349,037 1.73 Delta Airlines Air Transportation 368,700,450 1.17 Wasatch Plaza Holdings LLC Real Estate Holding 235,472,900 0.75 MPLD Husky LLC Manufacturing 212,352,900 0.67 Sky West Airlines Air Transportation 211,961,850 0.67 KBSIII, LLC Real Estate Holding 200,962,800 0.64 Questar Gas Natural Gas 195,331,617 0.62 Verizon Communications Inc. Healthcare research and investments 173,737,213 0.55 AT&T Inc. Telecommunications 147,985,384 0.47 $3,358,496,029 _________________________ (1) Taxable Value used in this table excludes all tax equivalent property associated with motor vehicles, watercraft, recreational vehicles, and all other tangible personal property required to be registered with the State. See “FINANCIAL INFORMATION REGARDING SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH — Taxable and Fair Market Value of Property.” (Source: Salt Lake City Corporation Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 2021.) TAX TREATMENT {TO BE UPDATED.} FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION Interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds is includible in gross income for federal income purposes. Ownership of the Series 2022_ Bonds may result in other federal income tax - 37 - consequences to certain taxpayers. Bondholders should consult their tax advisors with respect to the inclusion of interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds in gross income for federal income tax purposes and any collateral tax consequences. The City may deposit moneys or securities in escrow in such amount and manner as to cause the Series 2022_ Bonds to be deemed to be no longer outstanding under the Indenture (a “defeasance”). A defeasance of the Series 2022_ Bonds may be treated as an exchange of the Series 2022_ Bonds by the holders thereof and may therefore result in gain or loss to the holders. Bond holders should consult their own tax advisors about the consequences if any of such a defeasance. The City is required to provide notice of defeasance of the Series 2022_ Bonds as a material event under the Agreement (defined below). The Trustee is also required to provide notice of defeasance to holders in accordance with the Indenture. UTAH INCOME TAXATION In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under the existing laws of the State of Utah, as presently enacted and construed, interest on the Series 2022_ Bonds is exempt from taxes imposed by the Utah Individual Income Tax Act. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion with respect to any other taxes imposed by the State or any political subdivision thereof. Ownership of the Series 2022_ Bonds may result in other state and local tax consequences to certain taxpayers. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any such collateral consequences arising with respect to the Series 2022_ Bonds. Prospective purchasers of the Series 2022_ Bonds should consult their tax advisors regarding the applicability of any such state and local taxes. NO DEFAULTED BONDS The City has never failed to pay principal and interest when due on any of its bonds, notes or other financial obligations. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT The City will enter into a Continuing Disclosure Agreement (the “Agreement”), in substantially the form attached hereto as APPENDIX F, for the benefit of the beneficial owners of the Series 2022_ Bonds to send certain information annually and to provide notice of certain events to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board pursuant to the requirements of Section (b)(5) of Rule 15c2-12 (the “Rule”) adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A failure by the City to comply with the Agreement will not constitute a default under the Indenture and beneficial owners of the Series 2022_ Bonds are limited to the remedies described in the Agreement. A failure by the City to comply with the Agreement must be reported in accordance with the Rule and must be considered by any broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer before recommending the purchase or sale of the Series 2022_ Bonds in the secondary market. Consequently, such a failure may adversely affect the transferability and liquidity of the Series 2022_ Bonds and their market price. See “FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT” - 38 - attached hereto as APPENDIX F for the information to be provided, the events which will be noticed on an occurrence basis and the other terms of the Agreement, including termination, amendment and remedies. The City has entered into a number of continuing disclosure undertakings pursuant to the Rule with respect to the bonds it has issued and has contracted with a number of dissemination agents to file annual information and notices of certain events on behalf of the City. In the previous five years the City provided its annual financial information and audited financial statements to the applicable dissemination agent in advance of the deadline specified in the applicable continuing disclosure undertaking. Dissemination agents for certain of the City’s bonds filed such information late; however, the information was filed within 10 days of the deadline. Additionally, with respect to certain water and sewer bonds, during the previous five years the City filed the audited financial statements of the City’s utilities system, but did not include the audited financial statements of the City. Corrective filings have been made and the City has taken steps to ensure that in the future the City’s audited financial statements will be filed for such water and sewer revenue bonds as required. At the time of the initial corrective filings the City determined that such filings were immaterial with respect to certain maturities of the water and sewer revenue bonds that had already matured, and corrective filing were not made for such maturities. In connection with a prior purchase of certain of the City’s general obligation bonds, the purchaser requested that corrective filings be made for such previously matured water and sewer revenue bonds. The City complied with such request despite having determined that such filings were not material. The City has adopted continuing disclosure policies and procedures to help ensure compliance with its continuing disclosure undertakings. UNDERWRITING __________, as underwriter (the “Underwriter”), has agreed, subject to certain conditions, to purchase all of the Series 2022_ Bonds from the City at an aggregate price of $__________ (being an amount equal to the par amount of the Series 2022_ Bonds, less an Underwriter’s discount of $__________) and to make a public offering of the Series 2022_ Bonds. RATINGS As of the date of this Official Statement, the Series 2022_ Bonds have been rated “____” and “____” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and S&P Global Ratings, respectively. Such ratings reflect only the view of such organization and any desired explanation of the significance of such rating should be obtained from the rating agency furnishing the same. Generally, a rating agency bases its rating on the information and materials furnished to it and on investigations, studies and assumptions of its own. There is no assurance such rating will continue for any given period of time or that such rating will not be revised downward or withdrawn entirely by the rating agency providing such rating if, in the judgment of the rating agency, circumstances - 39 - so warrant. Any such downward revision or withdrawal of such rating may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Series 2022_ Bonds. MUNICIPAL ADVISOR The City has entered into an agreement with Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (the “Municipal Advisor”), whereunder the Municipal Advisor provides financial recommendations and guidance to the City with respect to preparation for sale of the Series 2022_ Bonds, timing of the sale, tax-exempt bond market conditions, costs of issuance and other factors related to the sale of the Series 2022_ Bonds. The Municipal Advisor has participated in the preparation of and provided information for certain portions of the Official Statement, but has not audited, authenticated or otherwise verified the information set forth in the Official Statement, or any other related information available to the City, with respect to accuracy and completeness of disclosure of such information, and the Municipal Advisor makes no guaranty, warranty or other representation respecting accuracy and completeness of the Official Statement or any other matter related to the Official Statement. LEGAL MATTERS LITIGATION The City Attorney reports the following matters involving potential financial liability of the City: Lawsuits are periodically filed against the City and/or its employees, involving tort and civil rights matters. The City has a statutory obligation to defend and indemnify its officers and employees in relation to lawsuits arising from acts or failures to act of the officers or employees while in the scope and course of employment. The City maintains a governmental immunity fund for claims against the City. In the event the fund is not sufficient to pay any outstanding judgment or judgments, the City has the ability under State law to levy a limited ad valorem tax to pay such judgments. This tax levy is separate and apart from the other taxing powers of the City. The City also has contract claims, condemnation proceedings and environmental matters, none of which is expected to materially adversely affect the City’s financial condition. A non-litigation certificate or opinion executed by the City Attorney, dated the date of each closing, will be provided stating, among other things, that to the best of her knowledge, after due inquiry, no litigation, with merit, in the State or federal court has been served on the City or is, to the best of her knowledge, threatened, challenging the creation, organization or existence of the City, or the titles of its officers to their respective offices, or seeking to restrain or enjoin the issuance, sale or delivery of the Series 2022_ Bonds, or for the purpose of restraining or enjoining the levy and collection of taxes or assessments by the City, or directly or indirectly contesting or affecting the proceedings or the authority by which the Series 2022_ Bonds are issued, the legality - 40 - of the purpose for which the Series 2022_ Bonds are issued, or the validity of the Series 2022_ Bonds, or the issuance thereof. APPROVAL OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The authorization and issuance of the Series 2022_ Bonds are subject to the approval of Chapman and Cutler LLP, Bond Counsel to the City. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the City by the City Attorney and by Chapman and Cutler LLP, as the City’s Disclosure Counsel. The Underwriter is being represented by its counsel, _______________. The approving opinions of Bond Counsel will be delivered with the Series 2022_ Bonds in substantially the forms set forth in APPENDIX D of this Official Statement and will be made available upon request from the contact persons as indicated under “INTRODUCTION—Contact Person.” INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The basic financial statements of Salt Lake City Corporation as of and for the Year Ended June 30, 2021 included in APPENDIX A to this Official Statement, have been audited by Eide Bailly, independent auditors, as stated in their report appearing herein. MISCELLANEOUS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION All quotations from and summaries and explanations of the Utah Constitution, statutes, programs, laws of the State, court decisions, and the Indenture, which are contained herein, do not purport to be complete, and reference is made to said Constitution, statutes, programs, laws, court decisions, and the Indenture for full and complete statements of their respective provisions. Any statement in this Official Statement involving matters of opinion, whether or not expressly so stated, is intended as such and not as representations of fact. This Official Statement is not to be construed as a contract or agreement between the Underwriter and the purchasers or owners of any of the Series 2022_ Bonds. The appendices attached hereto are an integral part of this Official Statement, and should be read in conjunction with the foregoing material. This Preliminary Official Statement is in form deemed final for purposes of paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The delivery of the Official Statement and its distribution and use has been duly authorized by the City. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH A-1 APPENDIX A SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021 (The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.) B-1 APPENDIX B MASTER TRUST INDENTURE† The format of the Master Indenture (i.e., font size, paragraph spacing, etc.) has been changed to allow for the presentation of this Official Statement to be as compact as possible. (The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.) † The attached conformed copy of the Master Trust Indenture includes the amendments contained in the Fourteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture. C-1 APPENDIX C DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC INFORMATION REGARDING THE CITY AND SALT LAKE COUNTY THE CITY POPULATION YEAR THE CITY % INCREASE FROM PRIOR PERIOD SALT LAKE COUNTY % INCREASE FROM PRIOR PERIOD THE STATE % INCREASE FROM PRIOR PERIOD 2021 estimates ______ _____% 1,186,421 0.1% 3,337,975 2.0% 2020 Census 199,723 7.12 1,185,238 15.11 3,271,616 18.37 2010 Census 186,440 2.58 1,029,655 14.61 2,763,885 23.77 2000 Census 181,743 13.63 898,387 23.75 2,233,169 29.62 1990 Census 159,936 (1.90) 725,956 17.27 1,722,850 17.92 1980 Census 163,034 (7.31) 619,066 34.99 1,461,037 37.93 1970 Census 175,885 (7.16) 458,607 19.73 1,059,273 18.94 _________________________ (Source: U.S. Census Bureau, as revised and subject to periodic revision.) PROPERTY VALUE OF PRE-AUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION IN THE CITY NEW ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS AND REPAIRS TOTAL CONSTRUCTION Year Number Dwelling Units Residential Value ($000) Non- residential Value ($000) Residential Value ($000) Non- residential Value ($000) Value ($000) % Change from Prior Period 2021 4,131 $765,117.5 $467,325.4 $ 48,870.3 $717,998.4 $1,999,311.7 5.4% 2020 2,282 309,034.0 418,296.0 105,562.2 620,532.8 1,453,425.0 2.6 2019 3,894 589,888.3 458,798.9 40,935.1 326,724.3 1,416,316.6 72.1 2018 877 126,957.6 430,249.0 37,989.1 227,906.6 823,102.3 (2.4) 2017 648 99,054.0 428,214.7 35,050.8 280,826.7 843,146.2 (43.1) 2016 3,049 377,547.5 331,676.4 38,680.1 734,678.9 1,482,582.9 155.3 ____________________ (Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute, University of Utah—Ivory-Boyer Construction Database.) BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY TAXABLE SALES AND LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX ALLOCATION — THE CITY YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 GROSS TAXABLE SALES* % CHANGE OVER PRIOR YEAR LOCAL OPTION SALES TAXES RECEIVED % CHANGE OVER PRIOR YEAR 2020 $8,866,974,472 (3.4)% $66,363,398 2.3% 2019 9,178,096,008 3.6 64,897,442 4.9 2018 8,862,086,472 7.7 61,864,444 8.3 2017 8,229,084,282 8.0 57,119,114 6.4 2016 7,615,725,610 -- 53,668,768 -- ____________________ * Source: Utah State Tax Commission. C-2 THE COUNTY The following demographic information is provided solely as background information regarding Salt Lake County (the “County”), the county in which the City is located. The County is the economic and population center of the State. Based on 2020 Census data, the County has approximately 36% of the total population of the State. SALES AND BUILDING IN SALT LAKE COUNTY SALES AND BUILDING 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Gross Taxable Sales $31,377,750 $30,093,152 $28,846,015 $27,084,521 $25,415,491 Permit Authorized Construction $4,043,270.6 $3,838,632.5 $3,015,289.6 $2,899,665.5 $3,266,939.5 New Dwelling Units 10,553 9,798 8,150 6,602 8,328 New Residential Value 1,929,212.7 1,804,752.7 1,470,556.5 $1,288,967.8 $1,406,216.3 ____________________ (Source: Utah Department of Workforce Services and Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute, University of Utah—Ivory-Boyer Construction Database.) INCOME AND WAGES IN SALT LAKE COUNTY INCOME AND WAGES 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Total Personal Income ($000) $68,854,783 $64,279,705 $59,895,272 $56,093,445 $53,262,453 Per Capita Income $59,077 $55,481 $52,130 $49,323 $47,524 Median Household Income Estimates NA $79,941 $73,619 $71,396 $68,404 Average Monthly Nonfarm Wage $5,146 $4,724 $4,512 $4,337 $4,211 ____________________ (Source: Utah Department of Workforce Services.) RATE OF UNEMPLOYMENT — ANNUAL AVERAGE YEAR SALT LAKE COUNTY THE STATE UNITED STATES 2022* 2.2% 2.1% 3.8% 2021 1.8 2.3 3.9 2020 5.1 4.7 8.1 2019 2.5 2.6 3.8 2018 2.9 3.0 3.9 2017 3.1 3.3 4.4 ____________________ * Preliminary; subject to change. As of February 2022 (seasonally adjusted). (Source: Utah Department of Workforce Services; U.S. Department of Labor.) C-3 LABOR MARKET DATA OF SALT LAKE COUNTY 2021* 2020 2019 2018 2017 Civilian Labor Force 642,357 634,741 619,396 614,498 Employed 609,766 618,767 601,161 595,348 Unemployed 32,591 15,974 18,235 19,150 Total Private Sector (average) NA NA 612,635 595,855 Mining 2,704 2,645 2,853 2,408 Construction 45,883 42,773 40,034 38,052 Manufacturing 56,540 57,836 56,653 55,951 Trade, transportation and utilities 145,125 145,881 143,262 138,920 Information 20,247 20,567 20,031 20,204 Financial activities 61,313 59,900 58,727 56,982 Professional and business services 128,950 129,758 125,720 122,209 Education, health and social services 83,301 84,687 82,534 81,174 Leisure and hospitality 51,823 62,712 60,804 58,811 Other services 20,477 22,401 21,859 21,295 Government 103,455 104,456 105,383 102,654 ____________________ * Through September 2021. (Source: Utah Department of Workforce Services.) C-4 SEVERAL OF THE LARGEST EMPLOYERS IN SALT LAKE COUNTY The following is a list of some of the largest employers in Salt Lake County. FIRM NAME INDUSTRY APPROXIMATE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES University of Utah Higher Education, Health Care 20,000+ State of Utah State Government 20,000+ Intermountain Health Care, Inc. Health Care 15,000-19,999 United States Government Federal Government 10,000-14,999 LDS Church Religious Agencies Religious Organizations 7,000-9,999 Zions Bancorporation Financial Services 7,000-9,999 Wal-Mart Warehouse Clubs/Supercenters 7,000-9,999 Granite School District Public Education 7,000-9,999 Jordan School District Public Education 5,000-6,999 Salt Lake County Local Government 5,000-6,999 Canyons School District Public Education 4,000-4,999 Delta Air Lines, Inc. Transportation 4,000-4,999 Amazon Fulfillment Services Delivery Service 3,000-3,999 ARUP Laboratories Medical Research 3,000-3,999 United Parcel Service Delivery Service 3,000-3,999 Smiths Grocery Stores 3,000-3,999 Discover Financial Services 3,000-3,999 Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care 3,000-3,999 Salt Lake City School District Public Education 3,000-3,999 Wells Fargo Financial Services 3,000-3,999 Salt Lake Community College Higher Education 3,000-3,999 L3 Technologies Manufacturing 3,000-3,999 U.S. Postal Service Postal Service 2,000-2,999 Goldman Sachs Financial Services 2,000-2,999 McDonalds Restaurants 2,000-2,999 Utah Transit Authority Public Transportation 2,000-2,999 Kennecott Utah Copper Mining 2,000-2,999 Salt Lake City Local Government 2,000-2,999 Merit Medical Systems Manufacturing 2,000-2,999 Skywest Airlines Transportation 2,000-2,999 C.R. England Delivery Service 2,000-2,999 Jetblue Airways Transportation 2,000-2,999 _____________________ (Source: Utah Department of Workforce Services. As of July 2021.) D-1 APPENDIX D PROPOSED FORM OF OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL E-1 APPENDIX E PROVISIONS REGARDING BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), New York, NY, will act as securities depository for the Series 2022_ Bonds. The Series 2022_ Bonds will be issued as fully-registered securities registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC’s partnership nominee) or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. One fully-registered Series 2022_ Bond certificate will be issued for each maturity of the Series 2022_ Bonds, each in the aggregate principal amount of such maturity, and will be deposited with DTC. DTC, the world’s largest depository, is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a “banking organization” within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. DTC holds and provides asset servicing for over 3.5 million issues of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issues, corporate and municipal debt issues, and money market instruments (from over 100 countries) that DTC’s participants (“Direct Participants”) deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates the post-trade settlement among Direct Participants of sales and other securities transactions in deposited securities, through electronic computerized book-entry transfers and pledges between Direct Participants’ accounts. This eliminates the need for physical movement of securities certificates. Direct Participants include both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations, and certain other organizations. DTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”). DTCC is the holding company for DTC, National Securities Clearing Corporation and Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, all of which are registered clearing agencies. DTCC is owned by the users of its regulated subsidiaries. Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, and clearing corporations that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or indirectly (“Indirect Participants”). DTC has a Standard & Poor’s rating of AA+. The DTC rules applicable to its Participants are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. More information about DTC can be found at www.dtcc.com. Purchases of the Series 2022_ Bonds under the DTC system must be made by or through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit for the Series 2022_ Bonds on DTC’s records. The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each Series 2022_ Bond (“Beneficial Owner”) is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants’ records. Beneficial Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase. Beneficial Owners are, however, expected to receive written confirmations providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect Participant through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the Series 2022_ Bonds are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on behalf of Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership interests in the Series 2022_ Bonds, except in the event that use of the book-entry system for the Series 2022_ Bonds is discontinued. E-2 To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Series 2022_ Bonds deposited by Direct Participants with DTC are registered in the name of DTC’s partnership nominee, Cede & Co., or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. The deposit of the Series 2022_ Bonds with DTC and their registration in the name of Cede & Co. or such other DTC nominee do not effect any change in beneficial ownership. DTC has no knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the Series 2022_ Bonds; DTC’s records reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose accounts such Series 2022_ Bonds are credited, which may or may not be the Beneficial Owners. The Direct and Indirect Participants will remain responsible for keeping account of their holdings on behalf of their customers. Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by Direct Participants to Indirect Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Beneficial Owners of the Series 2022_ Bonds may wish to take certain steps to augment transmission to them of notices of significant events with respect to the Series 2022_ Bonds, such as redemptions, tenders, defaults, and proposed amendments to the Series 2022_ Bond documents. For example, Beneficial Owners of the Series 2022_ Bonds may wish to ascertain that the nominee holding the Series 2022_ Bonds for their benefit has agreed to obtain and transmit notices to Beneficial Owners. In the alternative, Beneficial Owners may wish to provide their names and addresses to the Series 2022_ Bond Registrar and request that copies of notices be provided directly to them. Redemption notices shall be sent to DTC. If less than all of the Series 2022_ Bonds within an issue are being redeemed, DTC’s practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct Participant in such issue to be redeemed. Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor any other DTC nominee) will consent or vote with respect to the Series 2022_ Bonds unless authorized by a Direct Participant in accordance with DTC’s MMI procedures. Under its usual procedures, DTC mails an omnibus proxy to the City as soon as possible after the record date. The omnibus proxy assigns Cede & Co.’s consenting or voting rights to those Direct Participants to whose accounts the Series 2022_ Bonds are credited on the record date (identified in a listing attached to the omnibus proxy). As long as the book-entry system is in effect, redemption proceeds, distributions, and dividend payments on the Series 2022_ Bonds will be made to Cede & Co., or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. DTC’s practice is to credit Direct Participants’ accounts upon DTC’s receipt of funds and corresponding detailed information from the City or the Paying Agent, on payable date in accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC’s records. Payments by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in “street name,” and will be the responsibility of such Participant and not of DTC, the Paying Agent, or the City, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Payment of redemption proceeds, distributions, and dividend payments to Cede & Co. (or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC) is the responsibility of the City or the Paying Agent, disbursement of such payments to Direct Participants will be the responsibility of DTC, and E-3 disbursement of such payments to Beneficial Owners will be the responsibility of Direct and Indirect Participants. DTC may discontinue providing its services as depository with respect to the Series 2022_ Bonds at any time by giving reasonable notice to the City or the Paying Agent. Under such circumstances, in the event that a successor securities depository is not obtained, Series 2022_ Bond certificates are required to be printed and delivered. The City may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry transfers through DTC (or a successor securities depository). In that event, Series 2022_ Bond certificates will be printed and delivered to DTC. The information in this section concerning DTC and DTC’s book-entry system has been obtained from sources that the City believes to be reliable, but the City takes no responsibility for the accuracy thereof. F-1 APPENDIX F FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT Draft 4/4/22 SLC 22B Continuing Disclosure Agreement v2 871_____/RDB/ CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING CONTINUING DISCLOSURE INFORMATION UNDER PARAGRAPH (b)(5) OF RULE 15c2-12 DATED: __________, 2022 This Continuing Disclosure Agreement (the “Agreement”) is executed and delivered by Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), in connection with the issuance of $__________ Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B (the “Series 2022B Bonds”). The Series 2022B Bonds are being issued pursuant to (i) the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended; (ii) a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City on __________, 2022, which provides for the issuance and sale of the Series 2022B Bonds; and (iii) a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as heretofore amended and supplemented, between the City and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), and as further amended and supplemented by a Fourteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of __________ 1, 2022B, between the City and the Trustee (collectively, the “Indenture”). In consideration of the issuance of the Series 2022B Bonds by the City and the purchase of such Series 2022B Bonds by the beneficial owners thereof, the City covenants and agrees as follows: 1. PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT. This Agreement is executed and delivered by the City as of the date set forth below, for the benefit of the beneficial owners of the Series 2022B Bonds and in order to assist the Participating Underwriters in complying with the requirements of the Rule (defined below). The City represents that it will be the only obligated person with respect to the Series 2022B Bonds at the time the Series 2022B Bonds are delivered to the Participating Underwriters and that no other person is expected to become so committed at any time after issuance of the Series 2022B Bonds. 2. DEFINITIONS. The terms set forth below shall have the following meanings in this Agreement, unless the context clearly otherwise requires. “Annual Financial Information” means the financial information and operating data described in Exhibit I. “Annual Financial Information Disclosure” means the dissemination of disclosure concerning Annual Financial Information and the dissemination of the Audited Financial Statements as set forth in Section 4. “Audited Financial Statements” means the audited financial statements of the City prepared pursuant to the standards and as described in Exhibit I. “Commission” means the Securities and Exchange Commission. - 2 - Continuing Disclosure Agreement “Dissemination Agent” means any agent designated as such in writing by the City and which has filed with the City a written acceptance of such designation, and such agent’s successors and assigns. “EMMA” means the MSRB through its Electronic Municipal Market Access system for municipal securities disclosure or through any other electronic format or system prescribed by the MSRB for purposes of the Rule. “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. “Financial Obligation” means (a) a debt obligation, (b) a derivative instrument entered into in connection with, or pledged as security or a source of payment for, an existing or planned debt obligation, or (c) a guarantee of (a) or (b) in this definition; provided however, the term Financial Obligation shall not include municipal securities as to which a final official statement has been provided to the MSRB consistent with the Rule. “MSRB” means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. “Participating Underwriter” means each broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer acting as an underwriter in the primary offering of the Series 2022B Bonds. “Reportable Event” means the occurrence of any of the Events with respect to the Series 2022B Bonds set forth in Exhibit II. “Reportable Events Disclosure” means dissemination of a notice of a Reportable Event as set forth in Section 5. “Rule” means Rule 15c2-12 adopted by the Commission under the Exchange Act, as the same may be amended from time to time. “State” means the State of Utah. “Undertaking” means the obligations of the City pursuant to Sections 4 and 5. 3. CUSIP NUMBER/FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT. The CUSIP Numbers of the Series 2022B Bonds are as follows: YEAR OF MATURITY ([OCTOBER] 1) CUSIP NUMBER YEAR OF MATURITY (APRIL 1) CUSIP NUMBER - 3 - Continuing Disclosure Agreement The Final Official Statement relating to the Series 2022B Bonds is dated __________, 2022 (the “Final Official Statement”). 4. ANNUAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSURE. Subject to Section 8 of this Agreement, the City hereby covenants that it will disseminate its Annual Financial Information and its Audited Financial Statements (in the form and by the dates set forth in Exhibit I) to EMMA in such manner and format and accompanied by identifying information as is prescribed by the MSRB or the Commission at the time of delivery of such information and by such time so that such entities receive the information by the dates specified. MSRB Rule G-32 requires all EMMA filings to be in word-searchable PDF format. This requirement extends to all documents to be filed with EMMA, including financial statements and other externally prepared reports. If any part of the Annual Financial Information can no longer be generated because the operations to which it is related have been materially changed or discontinued, the City will disseminate a statement to such effect as part of its Annual Financial Information for the year in which such event first occurs. If any amendment or waiver is made to this Agreement, the Annual Financial Information for the year in which such amendment or waiver is made (or in any notice or supplement provided to EMMA) shall contain a narrative description of the reasons for such amendment or waiver and its impact on the type of information being provided. 5. REPORTABLE EVENTS DISCLOSURE. Subject to Section 8 of this Agreement, the City hereby covenants that it will disseminate in a timely manner (not in excess of ten business days after the occurrence of the Reportable Event) Reportable Events Disclosure with respect to the Series 2022B Bonds to EMMA in such manner and format and accompanied by identifying information as is prescribed by the MSRB or the Commission at the time of delivery of such information. MSRB Rule G-32 requires all EMMA filings to be in word-searchable PDF format. This requirement extends to all documents to be filed with EMMA, including financial statements and other externally prepared reports. Notwithstanding the foregoing, notice of optional or unscheduled redemption of any Series 2022B Bonds or defeasance of any Series 2022B Bonds need not be given under this Agreement any earlier than the notice (if any) of such redemption or defeasance is given to the Bondholders pursuant to the Indenture. 6. CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE OF THE CITY TO PROVIDE INFORMATION. The City shall give notice in a timely manner to EMMA of any failure to provide Annual Financial Information Disclosure when the same is due hereunder. In the event of a failure of the City to comply with any provision of this Agreement, the beneficial owner of any Series 2022B Bond may seek mandamus or specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its obligations under this Agreement. The beneficial owners of 25% or more in principal amount of the Series 2022B Bonds outstanding may challenge the adequacy of the information provided under this Agreement and seek specific performance by court order to cause the City to provide the information as required by this Agreement. A default under this Agreement shall not be deemed a default under the Indenture, and the sole remedy under - 4 - Continuing Disclosure Agreement this Agreement in the event of any failure of the City to comply with this Agreement shall be an action to compel performance. 7. AMENDMENTS; WAIVER. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the City by resolution or ordinance authorizing such amendment or waiver, may amend this Agreement, and any provision of this Agreement may be waived, if: (a) (i) the amendment or waiver is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in legal requirements, including without limitation, pursuant to a “no-action” letter issued by the Commission, a change in law, or a change in the identity, nature, or status of the City, or type of business conducted; or (ii) this Agreement, as amended, or the provision, as waived, would have complied with the requirements of the Rule at the time of the primary offering, after taking into account any amendments or interpretations of the Rule, as well as any change in circumstances; and (b) the amendment or waiver does not materially impair the interests of the beneficial owners of the Series 2022B Bonds, as determined by parties unaffiliated with the City (such as bond counsel). In the event that the Commission or the MSRB or other regulatory authority shall approve or require Annual Financial Information Disclosure or Reportable Events Disclosure to be made to a central post office, governmental agency or similar entity other than EMMA or in lieu of EMMA, the City shall, if required, make such dissemination to such central post office, governmental agency or similar entity without the necessity of amending this Agreement. 8. TERMINATION OF UNDERTAKING. The Undertaking of the City with respect to the Series 2022B Bonds shall be terminated hereunder if the City shall no longer have any legal liability for any obligation on or relating to repayment of the Series 2022B Bonds under the Indenture. The City shall give notice in a timely manner if this Section is applicable. 9. DISSEMINATION AGENT. The City may, from time to time, appoint or engage a Dissemination Agent to assist it in carrying out its obligations under this Agreement, and may discharge any such Dissemination Agent, with or without appointing a successor Dissemination Agent. 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to prevent the City from disseminating any other information, using the means of dissemination set forth in this Agreement or any other means of communication, or including any other information in any Annual Financial Information Disclosure or notice of occurrence of a Reportable Event, in addition to that which is required by this Agreement. If the City chooses to include any information from any document or notice of occurrence of a Reportable Event in addition to that which is specifically required by this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation under this Agreement to update such information or include it in any future disclosure or notice of occurrence of a Reportable Event. - 5 - Continuing Disclosure Agreement 11. BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement has been executed in order to assist the Participating Underwriters in complying with the Rule; however, this Agreement shall inure solely to the benefit of the City, the Dissemination Agent, if any, and the beneficial owners of the Series 2022B Bonds, and shall create no rights in any other person or entity. 12. RECORDKEEPING. The City shall maintain records of all Annual Financial Information Disclosure and Reportable Events Disclosure, including the content of such disclosure, the names of the entities with whom such disclosure was filed and the date of filing such disclosure. 13. ASSIGNMENT. The City shall not transfer its obligations under the Indenture unless the transferee agrees to assume all obligations of the City under this Agreement or to execute an Undertaking under the Rule. 14. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State. - 6 - Continuing Disclosure Agreement DATED as of the day and year first above written. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH By ____________________________________ Mayor Address: 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: _________________________________ City Recorder [SEAL] APPROVED AS TO FORM: By ____________________________________ Senior City Attorney EXHIBIT I Continuing Disclosure Agreement EXHIBIT I ANNUAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND TIMING AND AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS “Annual Financial Information” means financial information and operating data of the type contained in the Official Statement under the following captions: “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022B BONDS—Pledged Excise Taxes,” “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022B BONDS—Historical Pledged Sales and Use Taxes,” “DEBT STRUCTURE” and “FINANCIAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE CITY,” exclusive of Audited Financial Statements. All or a portion of the Annual Financial Information may be provided from the City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report or the Audited Financial Statements. All or a portion of the Annual Financial Information and the Audited Financial Statements as set forth below may be included by reference to other documents which have been submitted to EMMA or filed with the Commission. If the information included by reference is contained in a Final Official Statement, the Final Official Statement must be available on EMMA; the Final Official Statement need not be available from the Commission. The City shall clearly identify each such item of information included by reference. Annual Financial Information exclusive of Audited Financial Statements will be provided to EMMA, within 210 days after the last day of the City’s fiscal year, beginning with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Audited Financial Statements as described below should be filed at the same time as the Annual Financial Information. If Audited Financial Statements are not available when the Annual Financial Information is filed, unaudited financial statements shall be included. Audited Financial Statements will be prepared pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles applicable to governmental units in general and Utah cities in particular. Audited Financial Statements will be provided to EMMA within 30 days after availability to City. If any change is made to the Annual Financial Information as permitted by Section 4 of the Agreement, the City will disseminate a notice of such change as required by Section 4. EXHIBIT II Continuing Disclosure Agreement EXHIBIT II EVENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE SERIES 2022B BONDS FOR WHICH MATERIAL EVENTS DISCLOSURE IS REQUIRED 1. Principal and interest payment delinquencies 2. Non-payment related defaults, if material 3. Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties 4. Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties 5. Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform 6. Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the security, or other material events affecting the tax status of the security 7. Modifications to the rights of security holders, if material 8. Bond calls, if material, and tender offers 9. Defeasances 10. Release, substitution or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material 11. Rating changes 12. Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the City 13. The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving the City or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the City, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material 14. Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material 15. Incurrence of a Financial Obligation of the City, if material, or agreement to covenants, events of default, remedies, priority rights, or other similar terms of a Financial Obligation of the City, any of which affect security holders, if material 16. Default, event of acceleration, termination event, modification of terms, or other similar events under the terms of a Financial Obligation of the City, any of which reflect financial difficulties  This event is considered to occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer for the City in a proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the City, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governing body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the City. Draft 4/4/22 22B Form Purchase Contract v2 871____/RDB/mo BOND PURCHASE CONTRACT SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH $__________ FEDERALLY TAXABLE SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2022B __________, 2022 Salt Lake City 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 The undersigned, __________ (the “Underwriter”), acting on behalf of itself and not as fiduciary or agent for you, offers to enter into this Bond Purchase Contract (the “Purchase Contract”) with Salt Lake City, Utah (the “Issuer”), which, upon the acceptance by the Issuer of this offer, shall be in full force and effect in accordance with its terms and shall be binding upon you and the Underwriter. This offer is made subject to your acceptance and approval on or before [5:00 P.M.], Utah Time, on __________, 2022. Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as are set forth in the hereinafter referred to Preliminary Official Statement. ARTICLE I SALE, PURCHASE AND DELIVERY Section 1.1. Purchase and Sale. On the basis of the representations, warranties and agreements contained herein and upon the terms and conditions herein set forth, the Underwriter hereby agrees to purchase, and the Issuer hereby agrees to sell to the Underwriter, all of the Issuer’s $__________ Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B (the “Series 2022B Bonds”), at a purchase price of $__________ (representing the principal amount of the Series 2022B Bonds, less an Underwriter’s discount of $__________). Section 1.2. The Bonds. The Series 2022B Bonds will mature on the dates and in the amounts and bear interest at the rates per annum as set forth in the Indenture (defined herein) and as summarized in Exhibit A hereto. The Series 2022B Bonds shall be as described in the Official Statement dated __________, 2022, of the Issuer relating to the Series 2022B Bonds (together with all appendices thereto, the “Official Statement”) and shall be issued pursuant to and secured under a Master Trust Indenture dated as of September 1, 2004, as heretofore amended and supplemented (the “General Indenture”), and as further amended and supplemented by a Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture of Trust dated as of __________ 1, 2022 (the “Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture” and together with the General Indenture, the “Indenture”), all between the Issuer and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), all as authorized pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council of the Issuer (the “Council”) on - 2 - 22B Form Purchase Contract __________, 2022 (the “Resolution”). The Series 2022B Bonds are payable from and secured by revenues received by the Issuer from Pledged Excise Taxes on a parity with all Outstanding Parity Bonds now outstanding under the Indenture and any Additional Bonds hereafter issued under the Indenture. The Series 2022B Bonds are being issued pursuant to the Resolution, the Indenture, and the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”). The proceeds from the sale of the Bonds will be used to (a) finance all or a portion of the cost of (i) acquiring, constructing and improving _______________________ and (ii) acquiring, constructing, improving and remodeling various other capital improvement program projects (collectively, the “Series 2022B Project”) and (b) pay the costs incurred in connection with the issuance and sale of the Series 2022B Bonds. Section 1.3. Official Statement; Continuing Disclosure. By acceptance and approval of this Purchase Contract, the Issuer hereby authorizes the use of copies of the following in connection with the public offering and sale of the Series 2022B Bonds: the Official Statement, the Indenture and the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (as hereinafter defined). The Issuer hereby agrees to provide to the Underwriter within seven (7) business days of the date hereof sufficient copies of the Official Statement to enable the Underwriter to comply with the requirements of paragraph (b)(4) of Rule 15c2-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Rule 15c2-12”), and with the requirements of Rule G-32 of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the “MSRB”). (a) The Issuer has heretofore “deemed final” the Preliminary Official Statement dated __________, 2022, and relating to the Series 2022B Bonds (the “Preliminary Official Statement”) for purposes of paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 15c2-12 and acknowledges and ratifies the use by the Underwriter prior to the date hereof, of the Preliminary Official Statement in connection with the public offering of the Series 2022B Bonds. (b) In order to assist the Underwriter in complying with paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2-12, the Issuer will undertake, pursuant to a Continuing Disclosure Agreement in substantially the form attached to the Official Statement and to be dated as of the below defined Closing Date (the “Continuing Disclosure Undertaking”), to send certain financial information annually to the MSRB, and to provide notice of certain material events to the MSRB pursuant to the requirements of Section (b)(5) of Rule 15c2-12. Section 1.4. Public Offering. The Underwriter agrees to make a public offering of the Series 2022B Bonds at the initial offering prices or yields set forth on the inside front cover of the Official Statement. The Underwriter may, however, change such initial offering prices or yields as it deems necessary in connection with the marketing of the Series 2022B Bonds and offer and sell the Series 2022B Bonds to certain dealers (including dealers depositing the Series 2022B Bonds into investment trusts) and others at prices lower than the initial offering prices or yields set forth in the Official Statement. The Underwriter also reserves the right (a) to over-allot or effect transactions which stabilize or maintain the market prices of the Series 2022B Bonds at levels above those which might otherwise prevail in the open market and (b) to discontinue such transactions, if commenced, at any time without prior notice. - 3 - 22B Form Purchase Contract Section 1.5. Closing. At approximately [9:30 a.m.], Utah time, on __________, 2022, or on such later date as shall be agreed upon in writing by the Issuer and the Underwriter (the “Closing Date”), the Issuer will cause the Series 2022B Bonds to be delivered to the Underwriter in definitive form, duly executed and authenticated, and will deliver to the Underwriter the other documents herein mentioned at the offices of Chapman and Cutler LLP, Salt Lake City, Utah, or such other location as may be mutually agreed upon by the Issuer and the Underwriter. The Underwriter will accept such delivery and pay the purchase price of the Series 2022B Bonds as set forth in Section 1.1 hereof by wire transfer, payable in Federal Funds or other immediately available funds to the order of the Trustee (such delivery and payment are herein called the “Closing”). The Series 2022B Bonds shall be issued in the form of one fully registered Series 2022B Bond for each maturity of the Series 2022B Bonds and shall be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). ARTICLE II REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND AGREEMENTS OF ISSUER By its acceptance hereof, the Issuer represents and warrants to and covenants with the Underwriter that: Section 2.1. The Issuer is a municipality and a public body corporate and politic duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Utah (the “State”) with full power and authority to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Purchase Contract and the Official Statement, including the execution, delivery and/or approval of all documents and agreements referred to herein or therein. Section 2.2. The Council has duly adopted and approved the Resolution in accordance with all requirements of State law and the Council’s procedural rules, and the Resolution is in full force and effect on the date hereof. Section 2.3. The adoption of the Resolution and the execution and delivery of the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking, the Indenture and this Purchase Contract, compliance by the Issuer with the provisions of any or all of the foregoing documents and the application of the proceeds of the Series 2022B Bonds for the purposes described in the Preliminary Official Statement do not and will not, to the Issuer’s knowledge, conflict with or result in the breach of any of the terms, conditions or provisions of, or constitute a default under, any existing law, court or administrative regulation, decree or order, agreement, indenture, mortgage, lease or instrument to which the Issuer is a party or by which the Issuer or any of its property is or may be bound. Section 2.4. All authorizations, approvals, licenses, permits, consents and orders of any governmental authority, legislative body, board, agency or commission having jurisdiction of the matter which are required for the due authorization of, which would constitute a condition precedent to, or the absence of which would materially adversely affect the approval or adoption, as applicable, of the Resolution, the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking, the Indenture or this Purchase Contract, the issuance of the Series 2022B Bonds or the due performance by the Issuer - 4 - 22B Form Purchase Contract of its obligations under the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking, the Indenture, this Purchase Contract and the Series 2022B Bonds, have been duly obtained. Section 2.5. The Series 2022B Bonds and the Indenture conform to the descriptions thereof contained in the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement under the captions “THE SERIES 2022B BONDS” and “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2022B BONDS”; the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds will be applied generally as described in the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement. Section 2.6. By all necessary official action of the Issuer prior to or concurrently with the acceptance hereof, the Issuer has duly authorized all necessary action to be taken by it for the adoption of the Resolution; the issuance and sale of the Series 2022B Bonds by the Issuer upon the terms and conditions set forth herein, in the Official Statement and in the Indenture; and the execution, delivery and receipt of this Purchase Contract, the Indenture and the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking, and any and all such agreements, certificates and documents as may be required to be executed, delivered and received by the Issuer in order to carry out, effect and consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and by the Official Statement, including but not limited to such certifications as may be necessary to establish and preserve the exemption for State individual tax purposes of interest on the Series 2022B Bonds. Section 2.7. This Purchase Contract has been duly authorized, executed and delivered, and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Issuer, enforceable in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, and other similar laws and principles of equity relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights; and the Indenture and the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking, when duly executed and delivered, will constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of the Issuer, enforceable in accordance with their terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, and other similar laws and principles of equity relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights. Section 2.8. Except as described in the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement, no litigation in State or federal court has been served on the Issuer or is, to the best of the Issuer’s knowledge, threatened against the Issuer, or to the knowledge of the Issuer, any meritorious basis therefor, wherein an unfavorable decision, ruling or finding would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Issuer or the transactions contemplated by this Purchase Contract and the Preliminary Official Statement, or would have an adverse effect on the validity or enforceability of the Series 2022B Bonds, the Resolution, the Indenture or the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking, or any such litigation with merit which would in any way adversely affect the existence or any power of the Issuer or the titles of its officers to their respective positions or which would in any way adversely affect the exemption for State individual tax purposes of interest on the Series 2022B Bonds. Section 2.9. Based on the advice of the City Attorney’s office, when delivered to and paid by the Underwriter at the Closing in accordance with the provisions of the Resolution and this Purchase Contract, the Series 2022B Bonds will have been duly authorized, executed, issued and delivered and will constitute valid and binding special limited obligations of the Issuer (subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, and other similar laws and principles of - 5 - 22B Form Purchase Contract equity relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights) in conformity with, and entitled to the benefit and security of the Indenture on a parity with the Outstanding Parity Bonds. Section 2.10. The Issuer is not in material breach of or in material default under any existing law, court or administrative regulation, decree or order, ordinance, resolution, agreement, indenture, mortgage, lease, sublease or other instrument to which the Issuer is a party or by which the Issuer or its property is bound; and the execution and delivery of the Series 2022B Bonds, the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking, the Indenture and this Purchase Contract, and compliance with the provisions thereof, will not materially conflict with or constitute a material breach or a material default under any law, administrative regulation, judgment, decree, loan agreement, mortgage, indenture, deed of trust, note, resolution, agreement or other instrument to which the Issuer or its property is or may be bound. Section 2.11. No event has occurred or is continuing which, with the passage of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default or a material event of default under the Indenture, the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking or this Purchase Contract and would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Issuer, the Pledged Excise Taxes or the transactions contemplated by this Purchase Contract and the Preliminary Official Statement, or would have a material adverse effect on the validity or enforceability in accordance with their respective terms of the Series 2022B Bonds, the Resolution, the Indenture or the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking or in any way materially adversely affect the existence or any powers of the Issuer or the titles of its officers to their respective positions or the exemption for State individual tax purposes of interest on the Series 2022B Bonds. Section 2.12. The information contained in the Preliminary Official Statement was, as of its date and as of the date hereof, and the information included in the Official Statement will be as of its date and as of the Closing Date, true and correct in all material respects. The Preliminary Official Statement does not contain, and the Official Statement, as of its date and as of the Closing Date, will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact, and the Preliminary Official Statement does not omit and the Official Statement, as of its date and as of the Closing Date, will not omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements made therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; provided, however, that this representation and warranty shall not be deemed to cover or apply to (a) information provided to the Issuer in writing by the Underwriter and included on the inside front cover page of the Preliminary Official Statement or the Official Statement regarding the principal amount, interest rates, maturities and initial public offering prices of the Series 2022B Bonds; or (b) statements in the Preliminary Official Statement or the Official Statement relating to the book-entry system and DTC or the Underwriter. Section 2.13. If between the date of this Purchase Contract and 25 days following the “end of the underwriting period” (as defined under Rule 15c2-12), any event shall occur which might or would cause the Official Statement to contain any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstance under which they were made, not misleading, the Issuer shall notify the Underwriter and if, in the opinion of the Underwriter such event requires the preparation and publication of a supplement or amendment to the Official Statement, the Issuer will supplement or - 6 - 22B Form Purchase Contract amend the Official Statement in a form and in a manner approved by the Underwriter. If the Official Statement is so supplemented or amended prior to the Closing, such approval by the Underwriter of a supplement or amendment to the Official Statement shall not preclude the Underwriter from thereafter terminating this Purchase Contract, and if the Official Statement is amended or supplemented subsequent to the date hereof and prior to the Closing, the Underwriter may terminate this Purchase Contract by notification to the Issuer at any time prior to the Closing if, in the reasonable judgment of the Underwriter, such amendment or supplement has or will have a material adverse effect on the marketability of the Series 2022B Bonds. Section 2.14. If the Official Statement is supplemented or amended pursuant to Section 2.13 of this Purchase Contract, at the time of each supplement or amendment thereto and (unless subsequently again supplemented or amended pursuant to such paragraph) at all times subsequent thereto and prior to 25 days following the end of the underwriting period identified below, the Official Statement as so supplemented or amended will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which made, not misleading. Section 2.15. The Issuer will not take or omit to take any action which will in any way cause the proceeds from the sale of the Series 2022B Bonds to be applied or result in such proceeds being applied in a manner other than as provided in the Indenture. Section 2.16. The Issuer will furnish such information and execute such instruments and take such action in cooperation with the Underwriter, at no expense to the Issuer, as the Underwriter may reasonably request (A) to (i) qualify the Series 2022B Bonds for offer and sale under the Blue Sky or other securities laws and regulations of such states and other jurisdictions in the United States as the Underwriter may designate and (ii) determine the eligibility of the Series 2022B Bonds for investment under the laws of such states and other jurisdictions and (B) to continue such qualifications in effect so long as required for the distribution of the Series 2022B Bonds (provided, however, that the Issuer will not be required to qualify as a foreign corporation or to file any general or special consents to service of process under the laws of any jurisdiction) and will advise the Underwriter immediately of receipt by the Issuer of any written notification with respect to the suspension of the qualification of the Series 2022B Bonds for sale in any jurisdiction or the initiation or threat of any proceeding for that purpose. Section 2.17. The Issuer has complied, and will at the Closing be in compliance in all respects, with the obligations on its part contained in the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking, this Purchase Contract, the Indenture and any and all other agreements relating thereto. Section 2.18. Each representation, warranty, or agreement stated in any certificate signed by any officer of the Issuer and delivered to the Underwriter at or before the Closing shall constitute a representation, warranty, or agreement by the Issuer upon which the Underwriter shall be entitled to rely. Section 2.19. With the exception of the Outstanding Parity Bonds, the Issuer has not otherwise pledged or assigned the Pledged Excise Taxes other than to secure and pay the Series - 7 - 22B Form Purchase Contract 2022B Bonds and the Series 2022B Bonds enjoy a first lien and pledge on the Pledged Excise Taxes on a parity with the Outstanding Parity Bonds. Section 2.20. The Council has duly authorized and approved the issuance of the Series 2022B Bonds, the execution and delivery of the Indenture, the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking and this Purchase Contract. Section 2.21. Except as described in the Preliminary Official Statement, the Issuer is, and for the five years previous to the date hereof has been, in compliance with each undertaking it has entered into pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities Exchange Commission. Section 2.22. The Issuer agrees and acknowledges that: (i) with respect to the engagement of the Underwriter by the Issuer, including in connection with the purchase, sale and offering of the Series 2022B Bonds, and the discussions, conferences, negotiations and undertakings in connection therewith, the Underwriter (a) is and has been acting as a principal and not an agent or fiduciary of the Issuer and (b) has not assumed an advisory or fiduciary responsibility in favor of the Issuer; (ii) the Issuer has consulted its own legal, financial and other advisors to the extent it has deemed appropriate; and (iii) this Purchase Contract expresses the entire relationship between the parties hereto. Section 2.23. The financial statements of, and other financial information regarding the Issuer in the Preliminary Official Statement and in the Official Statement fairly present the financial position and results of the Issuer as of the dates and for the periods therein set forth. The financial statements of the Issuer have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied, and except as noted in the Preliminary Official Statement and in the Official Statement, the other historical financial information set forth in the Preliminary Official Statement and in the Official Statement has been presented on a basis consistent with that of the Issuer’s audited financial statements included in the Preliminary Official Statement and in the Official Statement. Section 2.24. Prior to the Closing, the Issuer will not take any action within or under its control that will cause any adverse change of a material nature in such financial position, results of operations or condition, financial or otherwise, of the Issuer. Section 2.25. The Issuer will not, prior to the Closing, offer or issue any bonds, notes or other obligations for borrowed money or incur any material liabilities, direct or contingent, except in the ordinary course of business, without the prior approval of the Underwriter. ARTICLE III UNDERWRITER’S CONDITIONS Section 3.1. The Underwriter has entered into this Purchase Contract in reliance upon the performance by the Issuer of its obligations hereunder. The Underwriter’s obligations under this Purchase Contract are and shall be subject to the following further conditions: - 8 - 22B Form Purchase Contract (a) At the time of Closing, (1) the Official Statement, the Indenture, the Resolution, the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking and this Purchase Contract shall be in full force and effect and shall not have been revoked, rescinded, repealed, amended, modified or supplemented, except as therein permitted or as may have been agreed to in writing by the Underwriter, and (2) the Issuer shall have duly adopted and there shall be in full force and effect such resolutions and ordinances as, in the opinion of Chapman and Cutler LLP, bond counsel to the Issuer (“Bond Counsel”), shall be necessary in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby. (b) The Underwriter may terminate its obligations hereunder by written notice to the Issuer if, at any time subsequent to the date hereof and on or prior to the Closing Date: (i) legislation shall be enacted or any action shall be taken by the Securities and Exchange Commission which, in the opinion of the Underwriter, has the effect of requiring the offer or sale of the Series 2022B Bonds to be registered under the Securities Act or any other “security,” as defined in the Securities Act, issued in connection with or as part of the issuance of the Series 2022B Bonds to be so registered or the Indenture to be qualified as an indenture under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended; (ii) the marketability of the Series 2022B Bonds or the market price thereof, or the ability of the Underwriter to enforce contracts for the sale at the initial offering prices set forth in the Official Statement, in the opinion of the Underwriter, have been materially adversely affected by an amendment to the Constitution of the United States or by any legislation in or by the Congress of the United States or by the State, or the amendment of legislation pending as of the date of this Purchase Contract in the Congress of the United States, or the recommendation to Congress or endorsement for passage (by press release, other form of notice or otherwise) of legislation by the President of the United States, the Treasury Department of the United States, the Internal Revenue Service or the Chairman or ranking minority member of the Committee on Finance of the United States Senate or the Committee on Ways and Means of the United States House of Representatives, or the proposal for consideration of legislation by either such Committee or by any member thereof, or the presentment of legislation for consideration as an option by either such Committee, or by the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation of the Congress of the United States, or the favorable reporting for passage of legislation to either House of the Congress of the United States by a Committee of such House to which such legislation has been referred for consideration, or any decision of any federal or State court or any ruling or regulation (final, temporary or proposed) or official statement on behalf of the United States Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service or other federal or State authority; (iii) in the reasonable judgment of the Underwriter, it is impractical or inadvisable for the Underwriter to market or sell or enforce agreements to sell the - 9 - 22B Form Purchase Contract Series 2022B Bonds because (A) trading in securities generally shall have been suspended on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., or a general banking moratorium shall have been established by federal or the State authorities, or (B) the State shall have taken any action, whether administrative, legislative, judicial or otherwise, which would have a material adverse effect on the marketing or sale of the Series 2022B Bonds, including any action relating to the tax-exempt status under State law of the interest to be received by any owner of the Series 2022B Bonds; or (C) the United States shall have become engaged in hostilities which have resulted in a declaration of war or a national emergency or there shall have occurred any other outbreak or escalation of hostilities or a national or international calamity or crises, financial or otherwise, (D) any financial rating assigned to the Bonds or the Issuer by S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”), Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”), or Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), as the case may be, shall have been downgraded, withdrawn, or any other action taken, and such action, in the opinion of the Underwriter, has a material adverse effect on the marketability of the Series 2022B Bonds; (iv) any litigation shall be instituted, pending or threatened (1) to restrain or enjoin the issuance, sale or delivery of the Series 2022B Bonds, (2) in any way contesting or affecting any authority for or the validity of the Series 2022B Bonds, any of the proceedings of the Issuer or the Trustee taken with respect to the issuance or sale thereof, the pledge, appropriation or application of any moneys or securities provided for the payment of the Series 2022B Bonds, or (3) in any meritorious way contesting or affecting the existence or powers of the Issuer or the Trustee or the titles of their officers to their respective offices; (v) any event shall have occurred or shall exist which, in the reasonable judgment of the Underwriter, makes or has made untrue or incorrect in any respect any statement or information contained in the Official Statement or is not or was not reflected in the Official Statement but should be or should have been reflected therein in order to make the statements or information contained therein not misleading in any material respect; (vi) there shall have occurred since the date of this Purchase Contract any materially adverse change in the affairs or financial condition of the Issuer, except for changes which the Official Statement discloses are expected to occur; or (vii) a material disruption in securities settlement, payment or clearance services shall have occurred. (c) At or prior to the Closing, the Underwriter shall receive the following: (i) the approving opinion of Chapman and Cutler LLP, Bond Counsel, dated the Closing Date, in substantially the form attached as Appendix D to the Official Statement and an Opinion and Negative Assurance Letter of Chapman and Cutler LLP, as disclosure counsel in the forms attached as Exhibit B hereto; - 10 - 22B Form Purchase Contract (ii) the approving opinion of Issuer’s Counsel, dated the closing date, in the form of Exhibit C hereto; (iii) the Issuer’s certificate, dated the Closing Date, signed by the Mayor of the Issuer and the City Recorder of the Issuer and in form and substance satisfactory to the Underwriter and Bond Counsel, to the effect that (1) the representations of the Issuer herein are true and correct as of the Closing Date as if made on the Closing Date; (2) no litigation in State or federal court has been served on the Issuer or is, to the best of their knowledge, threatened against the Issuer (a) to restrain or enjoin the issuance or delivery of any of the Series 2022B Bonds, or the collection of Pledged Excise Taxes pledged under the Indenture, (b) in any way contesting or affecting the authority for the issuance of the Series 2022B Bonds or the adoption of the Resolution or the execution and delivery of the Indenture, the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking or this Purchase Contract, the validity or enforceability of the Bonds, the Indenture, the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking or this Purchase Contract or the exemption for State individual tax purposes of interest on the Series 2022B Bonds, (c) in any meritorious way contesting the organization, existence or powers of the Issuer or the titles of its officers to their respective offices, or (d) contesting or attempting to restrain or enjoining the application of the proceeds of the Series 2022B Bonds or the payment, collection or application of Pledged Excise Taxes or the pledge of Pledged Excise Taxes, or of other moneys, rights and interests pledged pursuant to the Indenture or the adoption of the Resolution; (3) the descriptions and information contained in the Official Statement relating to the Issuer, its organization and financial and other affairs, and the application of the proceeds of sale of the Series 2022B Bonds are correct in all material respects, as of the date of the Official Statement and as of the Closing Date; (4) such descriptions and information, as of the date of the Official Statement did not, and as of the Closing Date do not, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements made therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; (5) no event affecting the Issuer has occurred since the date of the Official Statement that should be disclosed in the Official Statement for the purpose for which it is to be used or that is necessary to be disclosed therein in order to make the statements and information therein not misleading in any material respect; (6) the Indenture, the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking and this Purchase Contract have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Issuer and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by the other parties thereto, based upon the advice of the City Attorney’s office, the Indenture, the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking and this Purchase Contract constitute legal, valid and binding agreements of the Issuer enforceable in accordance with their respective terms except as enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting creditors’ rights and by the availability of equitable remedies; (7) the Resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of the Indenture, the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking and this Purchase Contract has been duly adopted and has not been modified, amended or repealed except as described in the Official Statement; and - 11 - 22B Form Purchase Contract (8) the execution and delivery of the Indenture, Continuing Disclosure Undertaking and this Purchase Contract and compliance with the provisions thereof, under the circumstances contemplated thereby, do not and will not in any material respect conflict with or constitute on the part of the Issuer a breach of or default under any indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, agreement or other instrument to which the Issuer is a party or any law, public administrative rule or regulation, court order or consent decree to which the Issuer is subject; (iv) copies of each of the Resolution, the Indenture and the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking, duly executed by each of the parties thereto; (v) copies of the Official Statement executed on behalf of the Issuer by the Mayor of the Issuer; (vi) the opinion of _______________, as counsel to the Underwriter; (vii) evidence satisfactory to the Underwriter that the Bonds have received ratings of “____” and “____” by S&P and Moody’s, respectively; (viii) all documents, certificates and opinions required by the Indenture; and (iv) such additional legal opinions, certificates, instruments and other documents as the Underwriter or Bond Counsel may reasonably request. All the opinions, letters, certificates, instruments, and other documents mentioned above or elsewhere in this Purchase Contract shall be deemed to be in compliance with the provisions hereof if, but only if, they are in form and substance satisfactory to the Underwriter and the Underwriter shall have the right to waive any condition set forth in this Section. ARTICLE IV EXPENSES All expenses and costs in connection with the authorization, issuance and sale of the Series 2022B Bonds to the Underwriter, including rating agency fees, the costs of printing of the Series 2022B Bonds, the costs of preparing the Preliminary Official Statement, the Official Statement, the initial fees of the Trustee in connection with the issuance of the Series 2022B Bonds, the fees and expenses of Bond Counsel, counsel to the Issuer, counsel to the Underwriter, and the Issuer’s financial advisor, if any, and travel and other expenses shall be costs and expenses of the Issuer and shall be paid by the Issuer. The Underwriter shall pay its travel and other customary costs in connection with the sale of the Series 2022B Bonds to the Underwriter. - 12 - 22B Form Purchase Contract ARTICLE V GENERAL Any notice or other communication to be given to the Underwriter under this Purchase Contract may be given by delivering the same in writing to _______________, _______________, __________, __________ ____, Attention: __________. Any notice or other communication to be given to the Issuer under this Purchase Contract may be given by delivering the same in writing to Salt Lake City Corporation, Attention: City Treasurer, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111. The approval or other action or exercise of judgment by the Underwriter shall be evidenced by a writing signed on behalf of the Underwriter and delivered to the Issuer. This Purchase Contract is made solely for the benefit of the Issuer and the Underwriter (including its successors or assigns) and no other person shall acquire or have any right hereunder or by virtue hereof. All the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein shall remain operative and in full force and effect and shall survive delivery of and payment of the Series 2022B Bonds hereunder and regardless of any investigation made by the Underwriter or on their behalf. This Purchase Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Utah. This Purchase Contract may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. REPRESENTATION REGARDING ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR ISSUER OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES AND FORMER ISSUER OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. The Underwriter represents that it has not: (i) provided an illegal gift or payoff to an Issuer officer or employee or former Issuer officer or employee, or his or her relative or business entity; (ii) retained any person to solicit or secure this Purchase Contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, or brokerage or contingent fee, other than bona fide employees or bona fide commercial selling agencies for the purpose of securing business; (iii) knowingly breached any of the ethical standards set forth in the Issuer’s conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code; or (iv) knowingly influenced, and hereby promises that it will not knowingly influence, an Issuer officer or employee or former Issuer officer or employee to breach any of the ethical standards set forth in the Issuer’s conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code. (Signature page follows.) S-1 22B Form Purchase Contract This Purchase Contract shall become effective upon the execution by _______________ and the acceptance hereof by the Issuer. Very truly yours, __________________ By: ____________________________________ Title: __________________________________ SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH By: ____________________________________ Mayor [SEAL] ATTEST: By: City Recorder Time of acceptance: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Senior City Attorney A-1 22B Form Purchase Contract EXHIBIT A MATURITY SCHEDULE FOR THE SERIES 2022B BONDS DUE ([OCTOBER] 1) PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE $ % B-1 22B Form Purchase Contract EXHIBIT B FORMS OF SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION AND NEGATIVE ASSURANCE LETTER OF BOND COUNSEL __________, 2022 _______________ _______________ _______________ Re: $__________ Salt Lake City, Utah Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds Series 2022B Ladies and Gentlemen: We have acted as disclosure counsel to Salt Lake City, Utah (the “Issuer”) in connection with the issuance of $__________ , aggregate principal amount of the Issuer’s Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B (the “Series 2022B Bonds”) issued on this date by the Issuer. The Series 2022B Bonds are issued pursuant to a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as heretofore amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), and as further amended and supplemented by a Fourteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of __________ 1, 2022 (the “Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture” and, collectively with the Master Indenture, the “Indenture”), between the Issuer and the Trustee. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings specified in the Official Statement, dated __________, 2022, relating to the Bonds (the “Official Statement”). Based upon our examination of such documents and questions of law as we have deemed relevant in connection with the offering and sale of the Bonds under the circumstances described in the Preliminary Official Statement dated __________, 2022, (the “Preliminary Official Statement”) and in the Official Statement relating to the Bonds, we are of the opinion that, under existing law, the Series 2022B Bonds are not required to be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Indenture is not required to be qualified under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended. In rendering this opinion, we have relied upon certifications of the Issuer with respect to certain material facts within the knowledge of the Issuer. Our opinion represents our legal judgment based upon our review of the laws and the facts that we deem relevant to render such B-2 22B Form Purchase Contract opinion, and is not a guarantee of result. This opinion is solely for your benefit as purchaser of the Series 2022B Bonds. This opinion is given as of the date hereof and we assume no obligation to revise or supplement this opinion to reflect any facts or circumstances that may hereafter come to our attention or any changes in law that may hereafter occur. This opinion is furnished by us as bond counsel. No attorney-client relationship has existed or exists between our firm and yourselves in connection with the Series 2022B Bonds or by virtue of this opinion. This opinion is not intended to be relied upon by owners of the Series 2022B Bonds or by any other party to whom it is not specifically addressed. Respectfully submitted, B-3 22B Form Purchase Contract [NEGATIVE ASSURANCE LETTER] __________, 2022 _______________ _______________ _______________ Re: $__________ Salt Lake City, Utah Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds Series 2022B Ladies and Gentlemen: We have acted as disclosure counsel to Salt Lake City, Utah (the “Issuer”) in connection with the issuance of $__________ , aggregate principal amount of the Issuer’s Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B (the “Series 2022B Bonds”), issued on this date by the Issuer. The Bonds are issued pursuant to a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as heretofore amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), and as further amended and supplemented by a Fourteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of __________ 1, 2022 (the “Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture” and, collectively with the Master Indenture, the “Indenture”), between the Issuer and the Trustee. The Series 2022B Bonds are being issued pursuant to the terms of the Bond Purchase Contract, dated __________, 2022 (the “Purchase Contract”), between the Issuer and ___________________ (the “Underwriter”). In accordance with our understanding with the Issuer, we have reviewed the official statement of the Issuer with respect to the Series 2022B Bonds, dated _________, 2022 (the “Official Statement”), certificates of officers of the Issuer and other appropriate persons, our opinions as bond counsel, and such other records, reports, opinions and documents, and we have made such investigations of law, as we have deemed appropriate as a basis for the conclusion hereinafter expressed. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Official Statement. As to facts material to the views expressed herein, we have, with your consent, relied upon oral or written statements and representations of officers or other representatives of the Issuer, including the representations and warranties of the Issuer in the Purchase Contract. In arriving at the conclusion hereinafter expressed, we are not expressing any opinion or view on, and with your permission are assuming and relying on, the validity, accuracy and sufficiency of the records, reports, documents, certificates and opinions referred to above (including the accuracy of all factual matters represented and legal conclusions contained therein, B-4 22B Form Purchase Contract including, without limitation, any representations and legal conclusions regarding the due authorization, issuance, delivery, validity and enforceability of the Series 2022B Bonds, the tax treatment of interest on the Series 2022B Bonds for federal income tax purposes, and the application of Series 2022B Bond proceeds in accordance with the authorization therefor). We have assumed that all records, reports, documents, certificates and opinions that we have reviewed, and the signatures thereto, are genuine. We are not passing upon, and do not assume any responsibility for, the accuracy, completeness or fairness of any of the statements contained in the Official Statement and make no representation that we have independently verified the accuracy, completeness or fairness of any such statements. In our capacity as disclosure counsel to the Issuer, to assist it in discharging its responsibility with respect to the Official Statement, we participated in conferences and correspondence with your representatives, representatives of the Issuer and other persons involved in the preparation of information for the Official Statement, during which the contents of the Official Statement and related matters were discussed and revised. The purpose of our professional engagement was not to establish or confirm factual matters set forth in the Official Statement, and we have not undertaken any obligation to verify independently any of the factual matters set forth therein. Moreover, many of the determinations required to be made in the preparation of the Official Statement involve matters of a non-legal nature. Based on our participation in the above- mentioned conferences and correspondence, and in reliance thereon and on our limited review of the records, reports, documents, certificates, statements, representations, warranties, opinions and matters mentioned above, without independent verification, we advise you as a matter of fact and not opinion that, during the course of our role as disclosure counsel to the Issuer with respect to the Bonds, no facts have come to the attention of the attorneys in our firm rendering legal services in connection with such role which caused us to believe that the Official Statement (apart from (i) CUSIP numbers, (ii) the information relating to The Depository Trust Company and its book-entry only system, and (iii) the financial statements or other financial, operating, statistical, numerical or accounting data contained or incorporated therein, as to all of which we do not express any conclusion or belief) contained as of its date or contains as of the date hereof any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted or omits to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. No responsibility is undertaken or statement rendered with respect to any other disclosure document, materials or activity, or as to any information from another document or source referred to by or incorporated by reference in the Official Statement. By acceptance of this letter you recognize and acknowledge that: (i) the preceding paragraph is not a legal opinion but is rather in the nature of negative observations based on certain limited activities performed by specific lawyers in our firm in our role as disclosure counsel to the Issuer; (ii) the scope of those activities performed by us for purposes of delivering this letter was inherently limited and does not purport to encompass all activities necessary for compliance with applicable securities laws; (iii) those activities performed by us rely on third party representations, warranties, certifications, statements and opinions, including and primarily, representations, warranties and certifications made by the Issuer, and are otherwise subject to the conditions set forth herein; (iv) we have not been engaged to act, and have not acted, as your counsel for any purpose in connection with the issuance of the Series 2022B Bonds; (v) no attorney-client B-5 22B Form Purchase Contract relationship exists or has at any time existed between us in connection with the Series 2022B Bonds or by virtue of this letter; and (vi) this letter is based upon our review of proceedings and other documents undertaken as part of our engagement with the Issuer, and in order to deliver this letter we neither undertook any duties or responsibilities to you nor conducted any activities in addition to those undertaken or conducted for the benefit of, and requested by, the Issuer. Consequently, we make no representation that our review has been adequate for your purposes. In further accordance with our understanding with the Issuer, we express herein no opinion or belief with respect to the validity of the Series 2022B Bonds or the taxation thereof or of the interest thereon, and our expression of belief with respect to the Official Statement assumes the validity of the Series 2022B Bonds, as set forth in our separate opinion as bond counsel. This letter is solely for the benefit of the Underwriter and may not be used, quoted, relied upon or otherwise referred to for any other purpose or by any other person (including any person purchasing any of the Series 2022B Bonds from the Underwriter) without our prior written consent. This letter is given as of the date hereof and we assume no obligation to revise or supplement this letter to reflect any facts or circumstances that may hereafter come to our attention. Respectfully submitted, C-1 22B Form Purchase Contract EXHIBIT C FORM OF OPINION OF ISSUER’S COUNSEL _______________, 2022 _______________ _______________ _______________ Zions Bancorporation, National Association One South Main Street, 12th Floor Salt Lake City, Utah 84133 Chapman and Cutler LLP 215 South State Street, Suite 560 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Re: $__________ Salt Lake City, Utah Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds Series 2022B Ladies and Gentlemen: I am the City Attorney of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the City’s and Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B (the “Series 2022B Bonds”). For purposes of this opinion, capitalized terms used herein and not defined have the meanings assigned to them in the Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as heretofore amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), and as further amended and supplemented by a Fourteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of __________ 1, 2022 (the “Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture” and, collectively with the Master Indenture, the “Indenture”). I, or others in this office under my supervision, have examined Resolution No. __ of 2022 adopted by the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) on __________, 2022 (the “Resolution”) providing for the issuance of the Series 2022B Bonds, that certain Certificate of Determination, dated __________, 2022, and such other documents and records of the City and any other papers as I or they have deemed relevant and necessary as the basis for the opinions hereinafter set forth. In this connection, I or they have examined fully executed counterparts of such documents, original or photostatic or certified copies of records of the City, certificates or letters of officers of the City and certificates of certain public officials. In such examination, I or they have assumed the genuineness and authenticity of all documents submitted to me or us as C-2 22B Form Purchase Contract originals and the conformity to original documents of documents submitted to me or us as certified or photostatic copies. I or they have relied upon such certificates of public officials and such certificates of officers of the City with respect to the accuracy of factual matters contained therein as I or they have deemed relevant and necessary as a basis for the opinions hereinafter set forth and I or they know of no reason why I or they should not rely thereon. All references herein to agreements, instruments, documents, laws, statutes, regulations, orders, writs, decrees and injunctions are as of the date hereof. Based upon the foregoing, I am of the opinion that: 1. The City has been duly and validly created as a municipality and public body corporate and politic existing under the laws of the State of Utah, with full power and authority (a) to enter into, execute and deliver the Indenture, the Continuing Disclosure Agreement of the City dated as of the date hereof (the “Continuing Disclosure Agreement”) and the Bond Purchase Contract, dated __________, 2022, entered into by and between the City and _______________ (the “Purchase Contract”); and (b) to perform its obligations under the Indenture, the Continuing Disclosure Agreement and the Purchase Contract and to authorize and issue, sell and deliver the Series 2022B Bonds. 2. The officials of the City named in the Preliminary Official Statement relating to the Series 2022B Bonds, dated __________, 2022 (the “Preliminary Official Statement”) and the Official Statement relating to the Series 2022B Bonds, dated __________, 2022 (the “Official Statement”), have been duly elected or appointed and are as of the date hereof, qualified to serve in their respective positions. 3. The City Council has duly adopted the Resolution authorizing the execution, issuance and delivery of the Series 2022B Bonds, the Indenture, the Continuing Disclosure Agreement and the Purchase Contract, and the Series 2022B Bonds, the Indenture, the Purchase Contract and the Continuing Disclosure Agreement have each been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the City and assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by the other parties, if any, thereto, all such instruments constitute valid and binding limited obligations of the City enforceable in accordance with their respective terms except as the enforceability thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium, or other laws affecting creditors’ rights generally or usual equity principles in the event equitable remedies are sought. 4. The Indenture creates a valid lien and charge against the Revenues and other funds and accounts created under the Indenture and pledged for the benefit of the payment of the Series 2022B Bonds. 5. The execution and delivery of the Indenture, the Series 2022B Bonds, the Continuing Disclosure Agreement and the Purchase Contract by the City and compliance with the provisions thereof will not conflict with or constitute a material breach or material default under any applicable law, administrative regulation, court order or consent decree of the State of Utah or, to my knowledge, of the United States of America or of any department, division, agency or instrumentality of either or any ordinance, agreement, note, resolution, indenture or other instrument of which I have knowledge to which the City is a party or by which it is bound. C-3 22B Form Purchase Contract 6. To the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry, there is no amendment or proposed amendment certified for placement on a statewide ballot to the Constitution of the State of Utah that would materially adversely affect the Series 2022B Bonds or any holder thereof in his capacity as such or the ability of the City to perform its obligations under the Indenture, the Continuing Disclosure Agreement or the Purchase Contract. 7. All approvals, consents and orders of any governmental entity, authority, board, agency or commission having jurisdiction that would constitute conditions precedent to the performance by the City of its obligations under the Indenture, the Series 2022B Bonds, the Continuing Disclosure Agreement or the Purchase Contract have been obtained. 8. To the best of my knowledge after due inquiry, except as disclosed in the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement, no litigation in the State of Utah or federal court has been served on the City or is threatened: (a) in any way affecting the existence of the City or contesting or affecting the validity or authority for the issuance of the Series 2022B Bonds or seeking to restrain or enjoin the issuance or delivery of the Series 2022B Bonds or the transactions contemplated in the Official Statement and the Indenture; (b) contesting the validity of the Indenture, the Series 2022B Bonds, the Continuing Disclosure Agreement or the Purchase Contract; (c) contesting or affecting or seeking to restrain or enjoin the collection of Revenues or other moneys pledged or to be pledged to pay the principal of and interest on the Series 2022B Bonds or otherwise under the Indenture or the pledge thereof; (d) contesting in any way the completeness or accuracy of the Official Statement; or (e) contesting the power of the officials of the City or its authority with respect to the Indenture, the Series 2022B Bonds, the Official Statement, the Continuing Disclosure Agreement or the Purchase Contract. 9. While not passing upon, and not assuming responsibility for, the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the statements contained in the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement, no facts have come to my attention which lead me to believe that (apart from the financial information, statistical data and forecasts contained therein, and information concerning The Depository Trust Company, the Trustee and the Financial Advisor, as to which no opinion or belief is expressed) the Preliminary Official Statement, as of its date and as of the date of the Purchase Contract, and the Official Statement, as of its date and as of the date hereof, contained or contains any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state at its date or omits at the date hereof to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. This opinion is furnished solely for the benefit of its addressees and may not be relied upon by any other person. Very truly yours, _______________________________________ City Attorney Salt Lake City, Utah Signature: Email: April Patterson (Apr 26, 2022 15:49 MDT) April Patterson april.patterson@slcgov.com Item B1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 PUBLIC HEARING MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Policy and Budget Analyst DATE:July 12, 2022 RE: FY 2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget Staff Note: The Council previously approved holding a CIP public hearing on July 12 and August 9 which have been publicly advertised. The Council is tentatively scheduled to continue discussing CIP project-specific funding on July 19, August 9, and August 16. MOTION 1 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council continue the public hearing to August 9. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:June 7, 2022 RE: FY2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) BUDGET BOOK PAGES: 119-131 CIP BUDGET BOOK: Debt Service Overview Starts on Page 25, General Fund Projects Start on Page 33 ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE Each year, the Council appropriates overall funding available for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and approves debt payments as part of the annual budget in June. Over the summer, the Council reviews individual projects and per state law must approve project specific funding by September 1. CIP is an open and competitive process where residents, local organizations and City departments submit project applications. The Community Development and Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) resident advisory board reviews the applications in public meetings and makes funding recommendations to the Mayor and Council. The Mayor provides a second set of funding recommendations to the Council which ultimately decides project specific funding. Overview of the FY2023 CIP Budget The total FY2023 CIP budget is nearly $45 million which is $9.7 million (27%) more than last year. Most of that increase is caused by a $10 million year over year increase in the General Fund transfer to CIP which is equivalent to 9% of ongoing revenues. The City has not reached the 9% level is at least a decade and an audit from several years ago recommended that level of annual capital investment. The table below details funding sources for CIP by fiscal year. Other highlights include: $8.1 Million Unrestricted Funds – $8,137,885 of the ongoing transfer from the General Fund are unrestricted funds available for any new projects (the most flexible funding available). Project Timeline: Budget Hearings: May 17 & June 7, 2022 1st Briefing: June 7, 2022 2nd Briefing & Public Hearing: July 12, 2022 3rd Briefing: July 19, 2021 4th Briefing & Public Hearing: August 9, 2022 5th Briefing & Potential Action: August 16, 2022 Note: The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in the annual budget. Project specific funding is approved by September 1. Page | 2 2 1 0 7 5 $4.9 Million Decrease of Impact Fees Spending – The amount of impact fees in the proposed CIP budget is the smallest amount since FY2019. There are over $23 million of available to spend impact fees across the four types: fire, parks, police, and transportation. Most of the available funds are for parks and transportation. See Additional info section for more. $3.1 Million Increase for County 1/4¢ Sales Tax for Transportation – This became a new funding source three years ago and is available to transportation projects per state law. As seen in other sales tax revenue line items, this one has experienced significant growth. $10.8 Million Debt and Lease Payments – $10.7 million (36%) of the General Fund transfer to CIP (including Funding Our Future dollars) is needed to cover debt payments and the Crime Lab lease payment. However, it should be noted that $4,393,161 of this amount is for a first-year payment on a proposed sales tax revenue bond for which the Council has not approved the list of projects. This funding could be used for FY2023 projects if the Council declines to proceed with the bond or approves a smaller bond. Comparison of CIP Funding Sources by Fiscal Year CIP Funding Sources Adopted 2020-21 Adopted 2021-22 Proposed 2022-23 FY22 to FY23 $ Change FY22 to FY23 % Change General Fund 14,582,267$ 15,126,884$ 25,150,431$ 10,023,547$ 66% Funding Our Future*4,880,000$ 3,580,000$ 5,100,000$ 1,520,000$ 42% Class C 3,000,000$ 3,021,706$ 3,000,000$ (21,7 06)$ -1% Impact Fees**5,058,011$ 8,27 6,103$ 3,360,193$ (4,915,910)$ -59% CDBG -$ 322,000$ 7 22,000$ 400,000$ ONE-TIME Repurpose Old CIP Accounts***1,149,616$ 252,271$ PENDING -ONE-TIME County 1/4¢ Sales Tax N/A 4,900,000$ 8,000,000$ 3,100,000$ 63% Surplus Land Fund 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ (200,000)$ ONE-TIME Smith's Naming Rights Revenue 156,000$ 154,000$ 154,000$ -$ 0% SLC Sports Complex ESCO 154,706$ 148,505$ 148,505$ -$ 0% Memorial House Rent Rev enue 68,554$ 68,554$ 68,554$ -$ 0% TOTAL 29,226,262$ 36,027 ,131$ 45,703,683$ 9,676,552$ 27% TOTAL without ONE-TIME 27 ,87 6,646$ 35,252,860$ 44,981,683$ 9,7 28,823$ 28% *Includes % to CIP "off the top" available to any project and funding for transit and public right of way infrastructure. Also, funding source is ongoing but Council could change the use categories in the future **There are four impact fee types: fire, parks, police and streets ***Includes recaptured funds from multiple funding sources Note: There's a $22,892 debt service rescope reduction not separated out in the table above for FY 2021 & FY2022 Two Differences between Advisory Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations (See Attachment 2 for Funding Log and Attachment 3 for the CIP Budget Book) Board and Mayoral funding recommendations are detailed at the bottom of each project page in the CIP Budget Book and on the CIP Funding Log. The CIP Log is Attachment 2 which first shows projects the Mayor is recommending for funding and then projects which are not recommended for funding. Differences between funding amounts are highlighted pink. This year the funding recommendations from the Community Development and Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) resident advisory board and the Mayor are nearly identical with two differences listed below. - The Board recommends funding $3.052 million for the 200 South reconstruction transit corridor project. The Mayor recommends $4,254,885 for the project which is $1,202,885 more than the Board. The 2018 voter-approved Street Reconstruction Bond is the primary funding sources for the project which is also receiving funding from several smaller sources. The project webpage is regularly updated and available here: www.slc.gov/mystreet/2020/03/27/200south/ Page | 3 2 1 0 7 5 - The increased funding for the 200 South reconstruction transit corridor (point above) is proposed to be shifted from the Cemetery Master Plan implementation. The Board recommends $1,202,885 for the Cemetery Master Plan implementation project and the Mayor recommends no funding. Note that the proposed sales tax revenue bond includes $11.2 million for City Cemetery road reconstruction. Use Combined Project Scores from CDCIP Board as Guide if Additional Funding is Available (See Attachment 4 for a summary sheet of Board votes and combined scores) The CDCIP Board scored and voted on each CIP application. The Board recommends that their combined scoring be used as a guide for how to spend additional CIP funding if it becomes available for FY2023 projects. The combined scores are shown in the right-most column and votes in the adjacent column. Note that board members may not have voted on a project because they were unavailable at the time (technical difficulties or not at the public meeting) or they declined to vote. $300+ Million Unfunded Capital Needs Over Next Decade in Context of FY2023 CIP, $65 Million Sales Tax Revenue Bond and $80 Million Parks and Public Lands General Obligation (GO) Bond (See Attachment 5 for a spreadsheet summarizing all projects in FY2023 CIP and the two proposed bonds) Last year, the Council held briefings about different iterations of a proposed sales tax revenue bond. The Mayor forwarded the recommendations after an approximately $80 million sales tax revenue bond was paid off in 2021. This removed a $5.3 million annual debt payment from CIP which has been paid using General Fund dollars. Council Members expressed interest in holding further discussions on how best to prioritize use of this funding opportunity (assuming available revenues) given that the City’s unfunded capital needs significantly exceed $5.3 million. The Mayor is proposing a new $65 million bond with an estimated $4.4 million annual debt payment and an $80 million G.O. bond for parks and public lands projects. The G.O. bond would need to first be placed on the ballot by the Council and then voters would decide whether to approve it. There is no legal deadline for the Council to approve, modify or decline the sales tax revenue bond. Note that some of the sales tax revenue bond projects would be issued under a tax-exempt bond while others would need to be a separate taxable (more expensive) bond. Also, the total cost of the bond is greater than the sum of the individual projects because it includes the cost of issuance and a contingency up to the $65 million maximum proposed. Below is a short list of the City’s unfunded capital needs from large single-site projects to long-term best management of capital assets like buildings, streets, and vehicles. This list is not comprehensive, and some costs may be higher since originally estimated. The total unfunded needs of the below list exceed $300 million and may be closer to $500 million depending on the specifics of new construction projects in the first bullet point. Note that these estimates for new assets do not include maintenance costs. Typically, a Capital Facilities Plan, is the mechanism to identify, track, prioritize and schedule unfunded capital needs over a long-term horizon. While the City does long-term planning in each department, a capital facilities plan typically includes a broader citywide view. The Administration has indicated that there is ongoing work towards this goal. The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an update on this effort. $TBD new construction and major redevelopments: Fleet Block, eastside police precinct or smaller substations, multiple aging fire stations, The Leonardo (old library), expansion of the S-Line Streetcar, downtown TRAX loop, quiet zones and undergrounding rail lines that divide the City’s west and east sides, implementing rest of the 9-Line, Folsom and McClelland urban trails, historic structures like Fisher Mansion and Warm Springs, rehabilitation or full rebuild of vehicle bridges including 200 South and 400 South over the Jordan River, etc. $133 million over ten years (in addition to existing funding level) to increase the overall condition index of the City's street network from poor to fair $33.8 million over ten years to bring all City facilities out of deferred maintenance $25 million for capital improvements at the City Cemetery, of which $12.5 million is for road repairs $20 million for a new bridge at approx. 4900 West from 500 South to 700 South $20 million above existing funding levels to fully fund the City’s fleet needs $6 million for planned upgrades to the Regional Athletic Complex $3.1 million for downtown irrigation system replacement $1.3 million for solar panels, parking canopy and security upgrade at Plaza 349 Recapture Funds from Completed Projects and Unfinished Projects Older than Three Years (Attachment 8 – Pending at time of publishing this staff report) The CIP and Debt Management Resolution (Attachment 1) requests that remaining funds from completed projects be recaptured and that remaining funds from unfinished projects over three years old also be Page | 4 2 1 0 7 5 recaptured. The table in Attachment 9 is staff’s attempt to follow up on the Council’s policy guidance for CIP projects. 64 projects are listed most of which received General Fund dollars and are over three years old. Several projects also received Class C funds or impact fees. The total funding is just over $4.2 million. Some of this funding could be recaptured by the Council as one-time revenue for General Fund uses, however, the Class C, CDBG and donations have uses limited by law. The table was sent to the Administration to identify whether a project is completed and status updates for unfinished projects. A response and potential funding to recapture by project will be added to one of the Council’s upcoming unresolved issues briefings. POLICY QUESTIONS 1.Balancing $300+ Million Unfunded Capital Needs, $80 Million Parks and Public Lands G.O. Bond, $65 Million Sales Tax Revenue Bond and FY2023 CIP – The Council may wish to discuss if projects in the proposed bonds and FY2023 CIP align with the Council’s policy priorities. The Council may also wish to discuss how to balance the City’s $300+ million unfunded capital needs including deferred maintenance for existing assets with funding construction of new assets. The Council is tentatively scheduled to review the bond projects in detail over the summer when also reviewing individual CIP projects. See Attachment 5 for a summary of projects by title and funding source for both bonds and FY2023 CIP. 2.Five Projects to Approve in June with Annual Budget or Add to Summer Deliberations – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration whether to approve in June with the annual budget and debt service payments any of the five projects below or add them to capital investment deliberations in July and August. The projects could be added to the Council’s deliberations to see the total capital investments proposed and which projects should be in FY2023 CIP, the General Obligation bond and/or the sales tax revenue bond. The five projects were not included in the open and competitive CIP process because they were identified by administrative staff outside separately, so the resident advisory board did not provide recommendations. The Council could ask if there are any legal or operational issues to be aware of. - $3.7 million handheld radios upgrade to next generation - $3 million complete streets - $2 million Funding Our Future Public Lands maintenance (further discussion with the department is needed) - $2 million restoration of City Hall insurance reimbursement - $700,000 maintenance of vacant city owned facilities 3.Inflationary Price Increases and the Cost Overrun Account – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how inflationary price increases have impacted departments utilizing the CIP Cost Overrun Account, and if additional funding may be needed to avoid project scope reductions. The Council could also re-evaluate the funding level for the account and/or the formula for maximum amounts a project may receive (see section 11 of Attachment 1). 4.Updating CIP Policy Guidance Attachment 1 – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration if it would be helpful for the Council to provide updated policy guidance such as when to disqualify an application, the Cost Overrun Account formula, project prioritization which could also inform the resident advisory board’s deliberations, details to provide for proposed projects, etc. The Council may also wish to discuss if new guidance could advance the Council policy priorities such as equity being considered in CIP. 5.Resources to Support Constituent Applications – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration the need to address geographic equity issues with additional targeted City resources for neighborhoods that submit few or no constituent applicants. Some Council Members expressed interest in being proactive to support constituent applications from neighborhoods with higher poverty rates. Some constituents and CDCIP Board Members commented at public meetings that they felt like some projects get more support from departments than others. 6.CIP Project Status Reports – The Council may wish to ask the Administration about mechanisms to facilitate the up-to-date sharing of information on current CIP projects. In the past, there were a variety of mechanisms to share information, ranging from topic-by-topic email requests to consolidated monthly reports. Council Members could then quickly provide accurate/timely information to interested constituents. Page | 5 2 1 0 7 5 7.Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for a status update on the CFP (10-Year Comprehensive CIP Plan). It’s envisioned as a living document that prioritizes capital needs across City plans and departments within funding constraints. The Council held a briefing in January 2019 about a draft of the plan. See Attachment 6 for the Council’s potential policy goals, metrics, and requests. ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION Definition of a CIP Project As defined in the Council-adopted 2017 Capital and Debt Management Guiding Policies Resolution (Attachment 1), a CIP project must “involve the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other physical structures, … have a useful life of five or more years, … have a cost of $50,000 or more, … or significant functionality can be demonstrated…such as software.” The Council also set a three-year spending deadline as part of the guiding policies. CIP accounts older than three years are periodically reviewed for recapture from projects that finished under budget or were not pursued. Surplus Land Fund The Surplus Land Fund receives proceeds from the sale of real property (land and buildings). According to City policy the Surplus Land Fund can be spent on purchasing real property and some funds may be diverted into the Housing Trust Fund. The funds are one-time because the real property can only be sold once. The current balance is approx. $2.3 million. The FY2223 budget proposes to discontinue the practice of using $200,000 annually to the Community and Neighborhoods Department for property maintenance expenses such as utilities, security, and minor repairs. This was using one-time funding for an ongoing expense. The change fulfills the Council’s legislative intent from FY2020. The ongoing General Fund transfer to CIP is proposed to cover that ongoing expense and is increased to $700,000. Cost Overrun Account The Administration reports the current available to spend balance is $557,476 which is a total of CIP appropriations from the last four fiscal years. The Council established this account for projects that experience costs slightly higher than budgeted. A formula determines how much additional funding may be pulled from the Cost Overrun account depending on the total Council-approved budget. See section 11 of Attachment 1 for the formula. This process allows the Administration to add funding to a project without returning to the Council in a budget amendment. A written notification to the Council on uses is required. The purpose is to allow projects to proceed with construction instead of delaying projects until the Council can act in a budget amendment which typically takes a few months. Updated Cost Estimates for Regular CIP Projects (Attachment 7) Attachment 7 will be updated over the summer to inform the Council’s project-specific deliberations in July and August. The Administration provided updated cost estimates for CIP projects that regularly come up. The updated Attachment 7 includes the prior FY2019 (calendar year 2018) cost estimates next to a column showing the 2021 estimates. Some categories have seen significant increases while others have closer to typical inflation rate increases. The Engineering Division provided some context that the City doesn’t know to what extent the larger price increases are temporary (such as related to pandemic caused short-term supply chain disruptions) or longer-term trends. Overall, prices are estimated to be up 10% to 14% according to Engineering. 1.5% for New Art and Maintenance of Existing Artworks (See Attachment 9 for the latest report) Attachment 9 is an annual report required by ordinance about maintenance of City artworks in the past fiscal year and planned for the next. The report summarizes eight artworks that received maintenance in FY2022 and 21 artworks planned for FY2023. Note that four artworks are identified for deaccession, that is removal from the City’s public art collection. Salt Lake City Code, Chapter 2.30, established the Percent for Art Fund and designates roles for the Art Design Board and Arts Council related to artist selection, project review and placement. The Public Art Program also oversees projects with funding from the Airport and RDA. In April 2021 the Council amended Chapter 2.30 to make several changes to the ordinance including an increase from 1% to 1.5% of ongoing unrestricted CIP funding for art minimum. There is no ceiling so the Council could approve funding for art above 1.5%. The ordinance also sets a range of 10%-20% for how much of the resulting annual funding is allocated to maintenance. This section of the ordinance also states that before funds are deposited into the separate public art maintenance fund a report from the Administration will be provided to the Council identifying works of art Page | 6 2 1 0 7 5 that require maintenance and estimated costs. This creates the first ongoing dedicated funding for conservation and maintenance of the City’s public art collection consisting of over 270 pieces. The collection is expected to continue growing. Note that in Budget Amendment #2 of FY20 the Council made a one-time appropriation of $200,000 to establish an art maintenance fund. CIP Debt Load Projections through FY26 (Note an $80 million bond was paid off in FY21 and the Mayor proposed a new $65 million sales tax bond) The Administration provided the following chart to illustrate the ratio of ongoing commitments to available funding through FY2026. Most of these commitments are debt payments on existing bonds. Other commitments include, ESCO debt payments, the Crime Lab lease, capital replacement funding for parks and facilities, contributions to the CIP cost overrun account and the 1.5% for art fund. The CIP Budget Book includes an overview and details on each of the ongoing commitments. 79% of the General Fund transfer into CIP was needed for these ongoing commitments in FY21. The percentage significantly decreased to approx. 40% after an $80 million bond was paid off. The chart does not reflect the Mayor’s proposed $65 million sales tax revenue bond which would add an annual $4.4 million debt payment for 20 years. The debt load significantly decreased in FY2022 because Series 2014A Taxable Refunding of 2005 bonds matured (paid off). It was approximately $80 million when the bond was originally issued (before refunding). This reduces the debt load from 79% to 40% and removes a $5.3 million annual debt payment. Note that General Obligation (G.O.) bonds are not paid from CIP because they are funded through a separate, dedicated voter-approved property tax increase. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Allocation of CIP General Fund Transfer Amount, 6 Year Projection, assuming 2% revenue growth per year, and continued allocation of 7% of GF revenue to CIP Debt Service On Bonds Other Debt Service Other Commitments Pay as You Go Projects Impact Fee Unallocated “Available to Spend” Balances and Refund Tracking The Council approved several million dollars in impact fee projects the past few years. The table below is current as of April 28, 2022 and includes a couple adjustments based on Budget Amendment #7 of FY2022. Available to spend impact fee balances are bank account balances subtracting encumbrances and expired funds. The Mayor’s Page | 7 2 1 0 7 5 recommended CIP budget proposes using $1,838,193 of parks impact fees and $1,522,000 of transportation impact fees. The total amount of the four impact fee types is $23,253,078. Impact fees must be encumbered within six years of the City receiving them. Type Unallocated Cash “Available to Spend”Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring Impact Fees Fire $1,000,885 More than a year away - Parks $14,031,723 More than a year away - Police $564,031 More than a year away - Transportation $7,656,439 More than a year away - Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract Impact Fee Eligibility Impact fees are one-time charges imposed by the City on new development projects to help fund the cost of providing infrastructure and services to that new development. This is part of the City’s policy that growth should pay for growth. A project, or portion of a project, must be deemed necessary to ensure the level of service provided in the new development area matches what is currently offered elsewhere in the city. As a result, it’s common for a project to only be partially eligible for impact fee funding (the growth-related portion) so other funding sources must be found to cover the difference. It is important to note that per state law, the City has six years from the date of collection to spend or encumber under a contract the impact fee revenue. After six years, if those fees are not spent then the fees are returned to the developer with interest. Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) (See Attachment 6) The CFP is a comprehensive 10-year CIP plan. See Attachment 6 for a summary of the Council’s requests and guidance during the January 2019 briefing from the Administration and discussion. It’s important to note, the Council expressed interest in identifying measurable goals to accomplish through the CFP and guide prioritization of project planning. Regular CIP Project Cost Estimate (See Attachment 7) Attachment 8 lists cost estimates for various types of projects based on actual costs from recent years. The document was developed by Council staff in collaboration with the Administration. The figures may not be up to date cost estimates but provide a ballpark figure when considering project costs. The three categories of project cost estimates are parks, streets, and transportation. The document was last updated July 2019. Updated cost estimates will be provided for the Council’s budget deliberations in July and August. County 1/4¢ Sales Tax for Transportation and Streets Funding The County fourth quarter-cent transportation funding is a new ongoing sales tax funding source dedicated to transportation and streets. The City has taken a progressive view of transportation beyond a vehicle-focused perspective and uses a multi-modal, more inclusive approach (walking, biking, public transit, accessibility and ADA, ride-share, trails, safety, scooters, etc.). The Wasatch Front Regional Council summarized eligible uses for this funding as “developing new roads or enhancing (e.g. widening) existing roads; funding active transportation, including bike and pedestrian projects; or funding transit enhancements. It can also be used for maintenance and upkeep of existing facilities.” (SB136 of 2018 Fourth Quarter Cent Local Option Sales Tax Summary June 22, 2018). Revenue from the 0.25% sales tax increase is split 0.10% for UTA, 0.10% for cities and 0.05% for Salt Lake County as of July 1, 2019 and afterwards. Note that there is overlap in eligible uses between this funding source and Class C funds (next section). Class C Funds (gas tax) Class C funds are generated by the Utah State Tax on gasoline. The state distributes these funds to local governments on a center lane mileage basis. The City’s longstanding practice has been to appropriate Class C funds for the general purpose of street reconstruction and asphalt overlays. The Roadway Selection Committee selects specific street segment locations (See next section below). Note that there is overlap in eligible uses between this funding source and the County 1/4¢ Sales Tax for Transportation and Streets Funding (previous section). Per state law, Class C funds may be used for: 1. All construction and maintenance on eligible Class B & C roads 2. Enhancement of traffic and pedestrian safety, including, but not limited to: sidewalks, curb and gutter, safety features, traffic signals, traffic signs, street lighting and construction of bicycle facilities in the highway right-of-way Page | 8 2 1 0 7 5 3. Investments for interest purposes (interest to be kept in fund) 4. Equipment purchases or equipment leases and rentals 5. Engineering and administration costs 6. Future reimbursement of other funds for large construction projects 7. Rights of way acquisition, fencing and cattle guards 8. Matching federal funds 9. Equipment purchased with B & C funds may be leased from the road department to another department or agency 10. Construction of road maintenance buildings, storage sheds, and yards. Multiple use facilities may be constructed by mixing funds on a proportional basis 11. Construction and maintenance of alleys 12. B & C funds can be used to pay the costs of asserting, defending, or litigating 13. Pavement portion of a bridge (non-road portions such as underlying bridge structure are not eligible) Roadway Selection Committee The Roadway Selection Committee determines specific projects for street improvement general purpose appropriations, e.g., reconstruction or overlay. In recent years this Committee guided use of Class C funds and revenues from the 2018 voter-approved Streets Reconstruction G. O. Bond. The Committee is led by Engineering and includes representatives of Streets, Transportation, Public Utilities, Public Services, HAND, Finance, the RDA and Council Staff. Information provided to the committee to consider in their selection process includes: Public requests for individual road repair On-going costs to keep a road safely passable Existing or planned private development or publicly funded construction activities in a neighborhood or corridor such as the Sugar House Business District or the 900 South corridor Safety improvement goals and crash data Public Utilities’ planned capital projects that would include a variety of underground facilities replacements, repairs, or upgrades Private utilities’ existing infrastructure, planned installations or repairs, e.g., fiber, natural gas, power Neighborhood or transportation master plan considerations Pavement condition survey data for ideal timing of asphalt overlays to extend useful life of a street In reviewing the above-mentioned criteria, open deliberations are held between committee members, and roads are selected for repair by consensus. The number of projects selected is contingent on available funding. Other City projects and master plans sometimes help in extending funds by combining project funding sources. CIP Planning Technology Improvements The Administration reports improvements are ongoing to CIP tracking of projects and applications. The City currently provides a public interactive construction and permits project information map available here: http://maps.slcgov.com/mws/projects.htm ATTACHMENTS 1. Capital and Debt Management Guiding Policies Resolution 29 of 2017 2. FY2023 CIP Funding Log – Note the spreadsheet from the Administration is not formatted for printing 3. FY2023 CIP Budget Book 4. FY2023 CDCIP Board Project Scores and Votes 5. Summary Spreadsheet of All Projects in Proposed FY2023 CIP, $65 Million Sales Tax Revenue Bond and $80 Million Parks and Public Lands G.O. Bond 6. Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Council Requests from January 2019 7. Regular CIP Projects Cost Estimates (July 2021) 8. List of Completed and Unfinished Projects Older than Three Years for Potential Funding Recapture – PENDING DEPARTMENT STATUS UPDATES 9. Art Maintenance Report for FY2022 and FY2023 10. Comparison of CIP Project Requests by Year and Type ACRONYMS CAN – Community and Neighborhood Department CDCIP – Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board Page | 9 2 1 0 7 5 CFP – Capital Facilities Plan CIP – Capital Improvement Program ESCO – Energy Service Company FTE – Full-time Employee FY – Fiscal Year G.O. Bond – General Obligation Bond RESOLUTION NO. _29_0F 2017 (Salt Lake City Council capital and debt management policies.) R 17-1 R 17-13 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council" or "Council") demonstrated its commitment to improving the City's Capital Improvement Program in order to better address the deferred and long-term infrastructure needs of Salt Lake City; and WHEREAS, the analysis of Salt Lake City's General Fund Capital Improvement Program presented by Citygate Associates in February 1999, recommended that the Council review and update the capital policies of Salt Lake Corporation ("City") in order to provide direction to the capital programming and budgeting process and adopt and implement a formal comprehensive debt policy and management plan; and WHEREAS, the City's Capital Improvement Program and budgeting practices have evolved since 1999 and the City Council wishes to update the capital and debt management policies by updating and restating such policies in their entirety to better reflect current practices; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to improve transparency of funding opportunities across funding sources including General Fund dollars, impact fees, Class C (gas tax) funds, Redevelopment Agency funds, Public Utilities funds, repurposing old Capital Improvement Program funds and other similar funding sources. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: That the City Council has determined that the following capital and debt management policies shall guide the Council as they continue to address the deferred and long-term infrastructure needs within Salt Lake City: Capital Policies 1. Capital Project Definition-The Council intends to define a capital project as follows: "Capital improvements involve the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other physical structures. A capital improvement must have a useful life of five or more years. A capital improvement is not a recurring capital outlay item (such as a motor vehicle or a fire engine) or a maintenance expense (such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches). In order to be considered a capital project, a capital improvement must also have a cost of $50,000 or more unless such capital improvement's significant functionality can be demonstrated to warrant its inclusion as a capital project (such as software). Acquisition of equipment is not considered part of a capital project unless such acquisition of equipment is an integral part of the cost of the capital project." 2. Annual Capital Budget Based on 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan-The Council requests that the Mayor's Recommended Annual Capital Budget be developed based upon the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan and be submitted each fiscal year to the City Council for consideration as part of the Mayor's Recommended Budget no later than the first Tuesday of May. 3. Multiyear Financial Forecasts-The Council requests that the Administration: a. Prepare multi-year revenue and expenditure forecasts that correspond to the capital program period; b. Prepare an analysis of the City's financial condition, debt service levels within the capital improvement budget, and capacity to finance future capital projects; and c. Present this information to the Council in conjunction with the presentation of each one- year capital budget. 4. Annual General Fund Transfer to CIP Funding Goal-Allocation of General Fund revenues for capital improvements on an annual basis will be determined as a percentage of General Fund revenue. The Council has a goal that no less than nine percent (9%) of ongoing General Fund revenues be invested annually in the Capital Improvement Fund. 5. Maintenance Standard-The Council intends that the City will maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect the City's capital investment and to minimize future maintenance and replacement costs. 6. Capital Project Prioritization-The Council intends to give priority consideration to projects that: a. Preserve and protect the health and safety of the community; b. Are mandated by the state and/or federal government; and c. Provide for the renovation of existing facilities resulting in a preservation of the community's prior investment, in decreased operating costs or other significant cost savings, or in improvements to the environmental quality of the City and its neighborhoods. 7. External Partnerships -All other considerations being equal, the Council intends to give fair consideration to projects where there is an opportunity to coordinate with other agencies, establish a public/ private partnership, or secure grant funding. 8. Aligning Project Cost Estimates and Funding-The Council intends to follow a guideline of approving construction funding for a capital project in the fiscal year immediately following the project's design wherever possible. Project costs become less accurate as more time passes. The City can avoid expenses for re-estimating project costs by funding capital projects in a timely manner. 9. Advisory Board Funding Recommendations-The Council intends that all capital projects be evaluated and prioritized by the Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board. The resulting recommendations shall be provided to the Mayor, and shall be included along with the Mayor's funding recommendations in conjunction with the Annual Capital budget transmittal, as noted in Paragraph two above. 10. Prioritize Funding Projects in the 10-Year Plan-The Council does not intend to fund any project that has not been included in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan for at least one (1) year prior to proposed funding, unless extenuating circumstances are adequately identified. 11. Cost Overrun Process -The Council requests that any change order to any capital improvement project follow the criteria established in Resolution No. 65 of2004 which reads as follows: a. "The project is under construction and all other funding options and/ or methods have been considered and it has been determined that additional funding is still required. b. Cost overrun funding will be approved based on the following formula: 1. 20% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project budgets of $100,000 or less; ii. 15% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project budgets between $100,001 and $250,000; iii. 10% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project budgets over $250,000 with a maximum overrun cost of $1oo,ooo. c. The funds are not used to pay additional City Engineering fees. d. The Administration will submit a written notice to the City Council detailing the additional funding awarded to projects at the time of administrative approval. e. If a project does not meet the above mentioned criteria the request for additional funding will be submitted as part of the next scheduled budget opening. However, if due to timing constraints the cost overrun cannot be reasonably considered as part of a regularly scheduled budget opening, the Administration will prepare the necessary paperwork for review by the City Council at its next regularly scheduled meeting." 12. Recapture Funds from Completed Capital Projects-The Council requests that the Administration include in the first budget amendment each year those Capital Improvement Program Fund accounts where the project has been completed and a project balance remains. It is the Council's intent that all account balances from closed projects be recaptured and placed in the CIP Cost Overrun Contingency Account for the remainder of the fiscal year, at which point any remaining amounts will be transferred to augment the following fiscal year's General Fund ongoing allocation. 13. Recapture Funds from Unfinished Capital Projects-Except for situations in which significant progress is reported to the Council, it is the Council's intent that all account balances from unfinished projects older than three years be moved out of the specific project account to the CIP Fund Balance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, account balances for bond financed projects and outside restricted funds (which could include grants, SAA or other restricted funds) shall not be moved out of the specific project account. 14. Surplus Land Fund within CIP Fund Balance -Revenues received from the sale of real property will go to the unappropriated balance of the Capital Projects Fund and the revenue will be reserved to purchase real property unless extenuating circumstances warrant a different use. It is important to note that collateralized land cannot be sold. 15. Transparency of Ongoing Costs Created by Capital Projects-Any long-term fiscal impact to the General Fund from a capital project creating ongoing expenses such as maintenance, changes in electricity /utility usage, or additional personnel will be included in the CIP funding log and project funding request. Similarly, capital projects that decrease ongoing expenses will detail potential savings in the CIP funding log. 16. Balance Budget without Defunding or Delaying Capital Projects -Whenever possible, capital improvement projects should neither be delayed nor eliminated to balance the General Fund budget. 17. Identify Sources when Repurposing Old Capital Project Funds-Whenever the Administration proposes repurposing funds from completed capital projects the source(s) should be identified including the project name, balance of remaining funds, whether the project scope was reduced, and whether funding needs related to the original project exist. 18. Identify Capital Project Details -For each capital project, the capital improvement projects funding log should identify: a. The Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board's funding recommendations, b. The Administration's funding recommendations, c. The project name and a brief summary of the project, d. Percentage of impact fee eligibility and type, e. The project life expectancy, f. Whether the project is located in an RDA project area, g. Total project cost and an indication as to whether a project is one phase of a larger project, h. Subtotals where the project contains multiple scope elements that could be funded separately, 1. Any savings derived from funding multiple projects together, j. Timing for when a project will come on-line, k. Whether the project implements a master plan, 1. Whether the project significantly advances the City's renewable energy or sustainability goals, m. Ongoing annual operating impact to the General Fund, n. Any community support for the project -such as community councils or petitions, o. Communities served, p. Legal requirements/mandates, q. Whether public health and safety is affected, r. Whether the project is included in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan, s. Whether the project leverages external funding sources, and t. Any partner organizations. Debt Management Policies 1. Prioritize Debt Service for Projects in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan -The Council intends to utilize long-term borrowing only for capital improvement projects that are included in the City's 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan or in order to take advantage of opportunities to restructure or refund current debt. Short-term borrowing might be utilized in anticipation of future tax collections to finance working capital needs. 2. Evaluate Existing Debt before Issuing a New Debt-The Council requests that the Administration provide an analysis of the City's debt capacity, and how each proposal meets the Council's debt policies, prior to proposing any projects for debt financing. This analysis should include the effect of the bond issue on the City's debt ratios, the City's ability to finance future projects of equal or higher priority, and the City's bond ratings. 3. Identify Repayment Source when Proposing New Debt-The Council requests that the Administration identify the source of funds to cover the anticipated debt service requirement whenever the Administration recommends borrowing additional funds. 4. Monitoring Debt Impact to the General Fund-The Council requests that the Administration analyze the impact of debt-financed capital projects on the City's operating budget and coordinate this analysis with the budget development process. 5. Disclosure of Bond Feasibility and Challenges -The Council requests that the Administration provide a statement from the City's financial advisor that each proposed bond issue appears feasible for bond financing as proposed. Such statement from the City's financial advisor should also include an indication of requirements or circumstances that the Council should be aware of when considering the proposed bond issue (such as any net negative fiscal impacts on the City's operating budget, debt capacity limits, or rating implications). 6. A void Use of Financial Derivative Instruments -The Council intends to avoid using interest rate derivatives or other financial derivatives when considering debt issuance. 7. Maintain Reasonable Debt Ratios-The Council does not intend to issue debt that would cause the City's debt ratio benchmarks to exceed moderate ranges as indicated by the municipal bond rating industry. 8. Maintain High Level Bond Ratings-The Council intends to maintain the highest credit rating feasible and to adhere to fiscally responsible practices when issuing debt. 9. Consistent Annual Debt Payments Preferred -The Council requests that the Administration structure debt service payments in level amounts over the useful life of the financed project(s) unless anticipated revenues dictate otherwise or the useful life of the financed project(s) suggests a different maturity schedule. 10. Sustainable Debt Burden-The Council intends to combine pay-as-you-go strategy with long-term financing to keep the debt burden sufficiently low to merit continued AAA general obligation bond ratings and to provide sufficient available debt capacity in case of emergency. 11. Lowest Cost Options-The City will seek the least costly financing available when evaluating debt financing options. 12. Avoid Creating Structural Deficits-The City will minimize the use of one-time revenue to fund programs/projects that require ongoing costs including debt repayments. 13. Aligning Debt and Project Timelines-Capital improvement projects financed through the issuance of bonded debt will have a debt service that is not longer than the useful life of the project. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this -~3L.Lr_...d ___ day of October , 2017. ATTEST: HB _A TTY -#64309-v3-CIP _and_ Debt_ Management_Pol icies SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By 4 = ASL CHAIRPERSON -=-::::::::____ Salt Lake City App ed As To Form By: ~~~~~~~.P aysen Oldroyd Da e: lt:>/-:z.../ 17 Division (Priority) / App Ref Organization Name Application Title Project Description/Summary Committee Score Final Recommended General Funds Final Recommended Class C Final Recommended Street Impact Fees Final Recommended Parks Impact Fees Final Recommended FOF Street Final Recommended FOF Other Final Recommended FOF Transit Final Recommended Qcent Tax Final Recommended General Funds Final Recommended Class C Final Recommended Street Impact Fees Final Recommended Parks Impact Fees Final Recommended FOF Street Final Recommended FOF Other Final Recommended FOF Transit Final Recommended Qcent Tax % of Art NA $156,107 $156,107 CIP Cost Overrun NA $208,143 $208,143 C31 Constituent 400 S Safety Improvements Add a school zone, crosswalk striping, curb bulb-outs and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons s to 400 S prioritizing children and other pedestrian safety in the wake of multiple incidents in the last few years which caused fatalities and hospitalizations. 102 $ 513,313 $- $- $- $ - $- $- $-$ 513,313 $- $- $- $- $- $- $- T1 New 200 South Reconstruction / Transit Corridor Supplement To support 1,100 local and regional buses per day, 200 South will become a de facto Bus Rapid Transit corridor. These funds will supplement 2023's 200 South Reconstruction project with exemplary bus boarding islands, bus shelters and designated bus lanes. 95 $ 1,500,000 $- $ 252,000 $- $ - $- $- $ 1,300,000 $ 2,700,242 $- $ 252,000 $- $- $ 2,643 $- $ 1,300,000 C9 Constituent Three Creeks West - Roadways Reconstruct a block of 1300 South and a block of 1000 West along Jordan River and install badly needed sewers. Will improve multimodal transportation, park access, public safety and basic sanitation, expanding on success of Three Creeks Confluence Park. 92 $ 1,359,130 $- $- $- $ - $- $- $- $ 1,359,130 $- $- $- $- $- $- $- T5 Renewal 300 N Complete Street Reconstruction Supplement Add intersection safety / Complete Streets elements to the 300 N reconstruction project: possible protected intersection at 1000 W and 300 N; improved pedestrian safety at intersections at 900 W, 800 W, 700 W, and 600 W; buffered bike lane on 300 N. 91 $ 500,000 $- $ 40,000 $- $ - $- $- $ 500,000 $- $ 40,000 $- $- $- $- $- C27 Constituent Rose Park Neighborhood Center Community Garden This community garden would be developed through the WCG Green City Growers Program in partnership with SLC Parks and Rose Park Neighborhood Center. The goal is to increase access to fresh, local produce & reduce barriers to urban food production. 91 $- $- $- $ 160,819 $ - $- $- $- $- $- $- $ 160,819 $- $- $- $- E1 Renewal Street Improvements 2022/2023 This annual program funds reconstruction or rehabilitation of deteriorated City streets, including curb and gutter, sidewalk, and drainage improvements as necessary. Where appropriate, it will include appropriate bicycle and pedestrian access improvements. 89 $- $ 3,000,000 $- $- $ - $- $- $- $- $ 3,000,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- P16 Planning Asset Management Plan Plan development to comprehensively guide future asset condition assessment and asset replacement, renewal and deferred maintenance needs in our parks citywide, including cataloging all park assets and current conditions. 85 $ 160,160 $- $- $- $ - $- $- $- $ 160,160 $- $- $- $- $- $- $- T4 New Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments Funds will construct bus stops so SLC-supported new and revised transit routes (4, 205, 1, 200, and others) are legal, accessible, safe, and convenient; and may provide match to federal grants received for transit hubs (especially 200 S, Westside hubs). 84 $- $- $ 110,000 $- $ - $- $ 990,000 $- $- $- $ 110,000 $- $- $- $ 990,000 $- FA1 New Facilities Asset Renewal Plan FY23 Following a 10 year plan to eliminate the $33,800,000 in deferred asset renewal, the Facilities Division will utilize the funds requested to replace assets that are beyond their useful life, prioritizing assets based on their criticality.84 $- $- $- $- $ - $ 1,192,357 $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $ 1,192,357 $- $- E4 New Bridge Replacement (650 North over the Jordan River) This project will replace the 650 North bridge over the Jordan River. The bridge was rated 61.44 BHI by UDOT (under 60 requires replacement) prior to the earthquake. A consulting firm with specialized experience will be used for this project. 84 $- $- $- $- $ - $- $- $ 3,700,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $ 3,700,000 E2 Renewal Public Way Concrete 2022/2023 This project will address displacements in public way concrete through saw-cutting, slab jacking, and removal and replacement of deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks, accessibility ramps, curb and gutter, retaining walls, etc.84 $ 436,281 $- $- $- $ - $- $- $- $ 436,281 $- $- $- $- $- $- $- CDCIP Recommendations Mayors Recommendations *Note: Deviations between the CDCIP Board and Mayor recommendations are highlighted in PINK Attachment 2 - FY2023 CIP Funding Log (recommended projects are listed first; note not formatted for printing) Division (Priority) / App Ref Organization Name Application Title Project Description/Summary Committee Score Final Recommended General Funds Final Recommended Class C Final Recommended Street Impact Fees Final Recommended Parks Impact Fees Final Recommended FOF Street Final Recommended FOF Other Final Recommended FOF Transit Final Recommended Qcent Tax Final Recommended General Funds Final Recommended Class C Final Recommended Street Impact Fees Final Recommended Parks Impact Fees Final Recommended FOF Street Final Recommended FOF Other Final Recommended FOF Transit Final Recommended Qcent Tax CDCIP Recommendations Mayors Recommendations *Note: Deviations between the CDCIP Board and Mayor recommendations are highlighted in PINK E3 Renewal Alleyway Improvements 2022/2023 This new annual program funds reconstruction or rehabilitation of deteriorated City alleyways, including pavement and drainage improvements as necessary.80 $ 142,919 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 142,919 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - P1 Planning Urban Farm development at 2200 West The demand for urban farming and local, sustainable food production has increased in the past years. This project would fund planning and design for new urban farm development at 2200 West located in Rose Park, and the Cannon Greens located in Glendale. 80 $ 425,040 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 425,040 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - E6 Renewal Bridge Preservation 2022/2023 The City is responsible for performing appropriate preservation activities on the 31 of the 35 vehicle bridges in Salt Lake City. Engineering manages a strategy to extend periods between major bridge repairs, based on UDOT's biennial condition report. 79 $ 108,008 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 108,008 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - P10 Renewal Cemetery Master Plan Project Implementation Design and Construction of projects outlined in the Cemetery Master Plan which may include structural preservation and restoration of historic WPA walls, installation of plat markers and interpretive/wayfinding signage.77 $ 1,200,242 $ 2,643 P12 New RAC Playground Phase II Design and construction of a new playground for ages 5-12 and shade sails at the Regional Athletic Complex to supplement CIP funding for design awarded in FY2021-22 and complete all phases of this project.73 $ - $ - $ - $ 521,564 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 521,564 $ - $ - $ - $ - E8 Phase 700 South (Phase 7, 4600 West to 5000 West) This project will complete the last half mile of a 4.6 mile 700 South reconfiguration from 25 Ft wide deteriorated asphalt road to a 50 FT wide concrete street with bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage from Redwood Rd to 5600 West. 73 $ - $ 1,120,000 $ - $ 850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,120,000 $ - $ 850,000 $ - $ - $ - C10 Constituent 900 South River Park Soccer Field Access to healthy outdoor recreation is a vital part of community health and wellbeing. There is an underused area perfect for a soccer field at 9th S. River Park. With minimal expense or upkeep this can be a great place for the community to recreate. 72 $ - $ - $ - $ 287,848 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 287,848 $ - $ - $ - $ - P11 New Memorial Tree Groves Design and Infrastructure Design and implementation of memorial tree groves that provide an opportunity to dedicate trees on public property through a donation by a member of the public. Project may include site alternatives, landscape design, irrigation installation, and signage. 61 $ - $ - $ - $ 867,962 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 867,962 $ - $ - $ - $ - FA2 Renewal Streets Steam Bay Expansion The existing steam bay is operating beyond capacity, limiting the efficiency of the asphalt crew and posing an environmental risk if the oil separator collapses. Adding a steam bay will mitigate this risk and ensure proper operation of asphalt equipment. 58 $ 597,792 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 597,792 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 6,942,885 $ 3,000,000 $ 1,522,000 $ 1,838,193 $ 915,000 $ 1,195,000 $ 990,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 6,942,885 $ 3,000,000 $ 1,522,000 $ 1,838,193 $ 915,000 $ 1,195,000 $ 990,000 $ 5,000,000 *** Total GF Recommendations + % of Art and Cost Overrun 7,307,135$ 7,307,135$ Division (Priority) / App Ref Organization Name Application Title Project Description/Summary Committee Score Requested Amount Requested General Funds Requested Class C Requested Street Impact Fees Requested Parks Impact Fees Requested FOF Street Requested FOF Other Requested FOF Transit Requested Qcent Tax Sustainability Score(1-10)Sustainability Comments PNUT Board Rank (1-18)Pavement Condition C41 Constituent California Avenue Safety Improvement Study This project is designed to study pedestrian safety improvements to be made at the intersections of California Avenue and Concord Street/Glendale Drive.91 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Project intended to investigate potential traffic calming measures in project area, which may enhance safety for pedestrians and other alternative forms of transportation. 0 Serious C28 Constituent 1000 W Fairpark Traffic Circle Create a traffic circle at the intersection of 1000 W and 500 N and include a public art installation that possibly shares some common themes with the state Fairpark. Also include several center medians with large trees and native plants along 1000 W.90 $ 569,534 $ 569,534 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 Poor C40 Constituent 900 West Corridor 900 West is in need of beautification and enhancements for pedetrians. This project would install speed feedback signs and upgrade lighting to be consistent with SLC streetlight master plan.89 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Project will enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists, promoting active transportation in this area.0 Fair/Good T7 Planning 2100 South Conceptual Design / Corridor Transformation The 2100 South reconstruction has the potential to be a highly transformative project for the Sugar House business area. This funding will enable design and possible Phase 1 / quick build implementation of this redesign in collaboration with the community.88 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 0 Failed T3 New Livable Streets Implementation This citywide program aims to address the most common resident complaint to Transportation staff - speeding vehicles. It uses a data-driven & equitable prioritization process for the implementation of traffic calming improvements in the areas most in need.88 $ 3,000,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 2,700,000 $ - $ - 7 "The requested General Funds are suggested to come from Funding Our Future. Recent discussions with city leadershipand city council have suggested that it may be appropriate to consider Livable Streets as a public safety relatedexpenditure. Public safety is one of the four themes recognized in the original council intents around Funding Our Futuresales tax. 10% of each line item anticipated to come from Impact Fees as part of the ongoing bike and pedestrian safety enhancements." Supports comprehensive pedestrian safety enhancements/traffic calming measures. 0 0 T2 New Highland Drive / 1100 E Complete Street & Parley's Trail Supplement (1700 S-I-80)Add walk/bike infrastructure, construct connections to Parley’s Trail, and address price inflation for the 2023 Highland Drive / 1100 E reconstruction. With significant residential growth in the Sugar House core, safer walk/bike access is critical.88 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ 245,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,255,000 7 Expands/enhances needed active transportation opportunities within the project area 0 Failed P19 Renewal Public Lands ADA Walkway and Asphalt Replacement Replace damaged concrete and asphalt in compliance with ADA regulations as often as possible. Priority locations may include: Memory Grove, West Capital, Wasatch Hollow, Cottonwood Park, SLC Cemetery, City Creek Park.87 $ 873,062 $ 873,062 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3 Enhances equitable access to public green open space. 9 0 C20 Constituent Jordan River Peace Labyrinth Park Improvements We propose to conduct a complete renovation and redesign of the Jordan River Peace Labyrinth Park to renew, improve, and add new amenities based on public feedback. The project will design and create a new public park that will improve the neighborhood.87 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3 Preserves and enhances public open space. Project plans not specific.15 0 P18 Renewal Playground Replacement Replace aging playgrounds throughout the parks system. Potential locations for replacement may include: Design for Rotary Playground at Liberty Park, and design and construction for Meadows, Pugsley Ouray, Parley's Way, Steenblik, Jefferson, Miami, Cotten.87 $ 1,874,063 $ 1,874,063 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1 Enhanced access to public green open space.7 0 C14 Constituent Madsen Park Renewal This inner-city neighborhood park has been neglected for many years, & neighbors want to reclaim it as an asset to the growing area. This park buttresses the new Folsom Trail & new development along 10th West and Chicago St. 87 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 This park should be an asset to the community but has been neglected for too long. With the growth coming to the area, the neighbors believe we need to reclaim this park for the enjoyment of the community and to push away criminal activity. Improving Madsen Park creates a positive gathering place for neighbors, in an up-and-coming area of SLC that needs to embrace its open space assets. Enhances open space, priority area of City, enhances public access amenity. 0 0 P9 New Folsom Trail Landscaping Phase I Construction of Phase I of landscaping plan for Folsom Trail, included in initial site design in 2021. Scope may include landscaping along the trail edges, with more significant irrigation, and trees at intersections along 600, 800, Jeremy, 900 and 1000 W.85 $ 1,767,908 $ 1,767,908 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 5 The Folsom Trail provides opportunity for alternative transportation in high-needs areas, identified in the PL Needs Assessment. Addition of landscaping will provide biodiversity, improved air quality and green space access in these communities. The Folsom Trail Corridor will provide residents with a unique urban trail and that supports a safe and comfortable walking and bicycling connection for all ages and abilities. Landscaping and other amenities are important to it's success. 12 0 C35 Constituent Liberty Wells Traffic Calming The “Liberty Wells Traffic Calming” project seeks to slow motor vehicles, improve safety near schools, homes, and businesses, and promote environmental sustainability by making our streets more welcoming to non-vehicular modes of transportation.85 $ 420,000 $ 420,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Project will enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists, promoting active transportation in this area. 0 Serious/Very Poor P13 Renewal Cottonwood Park Pavilions This project would fund design and construction of two new pavilions, and replacement of three existing pavilions in disrepair at Cottonwood Park. The two new pavilions would be replacements of previously-removed pavilions that are now empty concrete pads.82 $ 756,094 $ 756,094 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1 Enhanced access to public green open space.18 0 C30 Constituent 400 North Street Improvement An ornamental median and raised crosswalks down the middle of the street. This will help mitigate traffic, parking, & speeding. Will improve the safety, functionality, and restore the character to the neighborhood that was lost to SLC and utility project.82 $ 599,746 $ 599,746 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Project will enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists, promoting active transportation in this area. 0 Serious P20 Renewal Court Resurfacing Replace or resurface tennis and basketball courts throughout the parks system identified as failing or failed. Potential locations may include: Cottonwood basketball, Firestation Tennis, Westpointe Tennis and Basketball, Riverside Tennis.81 $ 1,478,739 $ 1,478,739 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 T8 Planning Ballpark Study Implementation - Phase 1 Initiate multimodal improvements outlined in the draft Ballpark Station Area Plan, such as technical analysis, engagement, and concept designs for ped/bike connections/crossings; 1300 South lane redesign; improved alleyways; and parking management.81 $ 500,000 $ 450,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Enhances safety for pedestrians and cyclists 0 0 T12 New Local Streets 2023 Reconstruction Supplement Two local streets scheduled for 2023 reconstruction need additional funds for complete streets elements: Pierpont Ave (400 W - 300 W) and 100 South (600 W - 500 W; just west of Gateway) both lack curb / gutter / sidewalk / bikeways.80 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 2 These two local streets are in areas with considerable pedestrian activity; this funding will support the addition of sidewalks and safer crossings along with potential street trees and lighting, similar to nearby streets.0 Serious/Failed C22 Constituent SLC Cemetery Infrastructure Repairs Repair Phase 1a roads as identified in the Salt Lake City Cemetery Master Plan. 80 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Preserves and enhances green public open space. 6 Very Poor C29 Constituent 1000 W intersection upgrades at 300 N and 400 N Add a permanent 4 way stop at 1000 W and 300 N with traffic islands, medians, raised crosswalks and other safety measures to improve safety for cars, pedestrians and cyclists. Also include improvements to 400 North intersection.80 $ 539,693 $ 539,693 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Project will enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists, promoting active transportation in this area. 0 Poor P3 Planning Tree Succession Design for Liberty Park Planning and design for aging tree canopy within Liberty Park. Project scope may include identification of vulnerable trees, public engagement, design for successional plantings, and visioning for areas affected by tree removal.79 $ 90,160 $ 90,160 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 5 Preserves public green space 11 0 P2 Planning Jordan River Tree Planting and Irrigation Planning and design for irrigation installation and tree planting along Jordan River Parkway, allowing for the reforestation of the riparian corridor, and providing increased shade for users, improving habitat and improving aesthetics along the parkway.79 $ 210,834 $ 210,834 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 7 Trees increase air quality and quality of life. The Jordan River serves many communities across the City as well as many high -needs areas, according to the Needs Assessment. Native trees will mitigate invasive species and provide shade to usersresidents. The Jordan River is the ecological heart of Salt Lake's Westside. This project will further develop tree canopy that provides shade for recreational users and improves wildlife habitat throughout the entire JRP corridor. 14 0 P7 Planning Riverview Native Plant Center Phase 1A Design & construction documents for a native plant center on the Jordan River. The farm, greenhouse and related infrastructure would create capacity to grow native plants for citywide projects, increasing health and biodiversity of SLC's public lands. 77 $ 412,160 $ 412,160 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 7 Design & construction documents for a native plant center on the Jordan River. The farm, greenhouse and related infrastructure would create capacity to grow native plants for citywide projects, increasing health and biodiversity of SLC'spublic lands. The site is near many schools which would provide educational opportunities. Additionally, it would provide a functional and accessible facility for west side communities and visitors that would help contribute to environmental sustainability in the City. 17 0 C38 Constituent Sugar House Safe Side Streets Part 2 This request, combined with $153,221 from FY21/22, completes funding required to design and construct desired traffic calming for the project area’s six local streets: Hollywood Ave, Ramona Ave, Garfield Ave, Lincoln St, 1000 E, and McClelland St.77 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 Serious/Very Poor T13 Renewal Replacement Traffic Signals (4)Upgrade four top priority aging traffic signals, along with their surrounding intersections, with safety and operational improvements for all modes.77 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,260,000 $ - $ 140,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 C6 Constituent Brentwood Circle Storm Water Drainage This project will prevent massive flooding of Parleys neighborhood homes by creating and implementing a plan to divert storm water from Brentwood Circle. 76 $ 160,129 $ 160,129 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 8 Project mitigates stormwater flooding incidents that have caused damage to homes in the neighborhood, particularly during "100-year storm events". Proposed project is example of resilience measure that will be needed to mitigate climate-related impacts.0 Satisfactory T6 Renewal Multi-modal Transportation Safety Improvements Citywide traffic safety projects include the installation of warranted crossing beacons, traffic signals, or other traffic control devices and minor reconfiguration of intersections or roadways to address safety issues.76 $ 300,000 $ 270,000 $ - $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 2 Supports comprehensive pedestrian safety enhancements 0 0 C23 Constituent Taufer Park Revamp Taufer Park is in need of public engagement and improvements to make this downtown park an asset to the community. This funding will go towards public engagement and conceptual design to re-envision Taufer Park as a community asset instead of a liability.76 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3 Enhances maintenance and accessibility of green public open space. 0 0 P8 Renewal Library Plaza Repair and Improvements Planning and design for Library Plaza, including analysis of the current wedge wall, fountain, retaining wall and paver replacement. These assets are all currently failing and are in need of repair/replacement in the next three years.76 $ 205,755 $ 205,755 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 T11 Renewal Replacement Traffic Signal; Asset Condition Report Upgrade a top priority aging traffic signal and intersection with safety and operational improvements for all modes. Formalize a city-wide signal condition report with stakeholder input on asset condition priorities and multi-modal recommendations.76 $ 450,000 $ 415,000 $ - $ 35,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 P4 Planning NW Quadrant trails and Greenway Planning Planning and design for public trails in the NW Quadrant. Goals may include: provide and maintain high-quality, safe, affordable trail network, support developed recreation opportunities near SR-201, foster stewardship of natural environment/greenways.76 $ 257,600 $ 257,600 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 8 The lack of open space/parks in the NW Quadrant results in perpetuation of environmental injustice. This network would provide alternative modes of transport that would minimize health risks and provide essential green space to underservedcommunitiesThe trails would provide essential green space in a sea of industrial development, connectivity for safe, alternative modes of transportation to other City communities, and support additional, developed recreation opportunities near SR-201 5 0 T9 Planning Future Transformations: Corridor and Area Studies Funds will be used to develop concept designs with public input, primarily for streets to be transformed or reconstructed after the Street Bond ends in 2025. This will enable us to request “Complete Budgets for Complete Streets” in FY25 CIP applications. 75 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 5 This project will contract with an engineering firm with expertise in structures such as bridges and tunnels to complete 40% design and cost estimates to improve pedestrian and bike crossings across Foothill Drive. This will include multiple, likely grade-separated, ped/bike crossings (bridges or tunnels)as well as enhancements to other at-grade crossings that already exist 0 0 C17 Constituent Reopen Dinwoody Park as a Public Park Dinwoody Park was listed in 1975 as one of the SLC Redevelopment Agency's crowing achievements but has since been fenced off & closed to the public. This area has a very low level of service for parks per resident & reopening would improve the community.74 $ 71,198 $ 71,198 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3 Preserves and enhances public open space in urban neighborhood. 0 0 C19 Constituent Folsom Trail- Request on behalf of River District Business Alliance Completion of landscape, hardscape, lighting, public art, daylighting of City Creek, and other improvements related to the Folsom Trail. 74 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 5 The first phase of the Folsom Trail project, which is currently on-going, focuses on trail design and construction thatsupports a safe and comfortable walking and bicycling connection for all ages and abilities. Future phases of improvements to the Folsom Corridor will explore options for encouraging redevelopment, expanding the focus on greenspace, ecological improvements, and water quality. The City has also studied the feasibility of creating a small streamchannel, or“daylighting”using the excess City Creek runoff currently in the Folsom Drain. The amounts requested above will provide funding for the elements of the project that have been omitted from the current scope of the project due to budgetary constraints. Enhancement to active transportation corridor project. 8 0 E10 New Bridge Replacement (200 South over Jordan River) The project will replace 200 South bridge over Jordan River. UDOT rated the bridge 61.90 BHI (<60 requires replacement) prior to the earthquake. Design considers complete streets, Jordan River Trail, historic Fisher Mansion, and potential art components.73 $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 Very Poor/Fair P14 Planning Public Lands 5-Year Strategic Plan The Public Lands 5-Year Strategic Plan will provide key organizational directives to help effectively accomplish the goals of the Reimagine Nature Master Plan. The document will be the third of 3 documents required for CAPRA accreditation. 72 $ 154,000 $ 154,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 6 The Public Lands 5-Year Strategic Plan will provide key organizational directives to help effectively accomplish the goals of the Reimagine Nature Master Plan. The document will be the third of 3 documents required for CAPRA accreditation.This plan will provide strategies for project implementation from the Master Plan, recommendations for which came from the Needs Assessment which identified underserved areas and priority projects based on public engagement and demographicanalysis. Supports city-wide efforts to maintain and enhance public green open space. 2 0 E9 Renewal Bridge Rehabilitation (400 South over the Jordan River) This project will rehabilitate the 400 South vehicle bridge over the Jordan River. The bridge was rated 64.73 BHI by UDOT (under 60 requires replacement) prior to the earthquake. A consulting firm with specialized experience will be used for this project.72 $ 1,700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,700,000 0 Fair/Poor C21 Constituent Replace Fairpark Tennis Courts with New Sports Court This project will replace the existing tennis courts with either new tennis courts, 6 pickleball courts, or one tennis court and 3 pickleball courts. If funding permits a water fountain and seating would also be included in this project.72 $ 496,109 $ 496,109 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 P15 Planning Jordan Park and International Peace Gardens Master Plan and CLR Plan development for future management and projects for Jordan Park and Peace Gardens, including potential expansion of the Peace Gardens. This project includes robust community engagement, visioning and implementation strategies, and may include a CLR.71 $ 251,160 $ 251,160 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Enhances/expands access to public green open space in a high-needs area as designated in the Needs Assessment.0 0 C25 Constituent 1200 East Median, Raise Curb, new irrigation, new tree planting Install new curbing, replace irrigation systems, install a significant amount of added trees via community matching funds to supplement the urban forest that remains due to this infrastructure falling into serious disrepair and creating safety hazard.70 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3 Enhances maintenance and accessibility of green public open space. 0 Serious/Very Poor C36 Constituent Neighborhood Identification Equity Project This proposal supported by the Glendale Neighborhood Council to promote equity in neighborhood identity. The council is writing to propose the creation of a new neighborhood entrance.70 $ 245,215 $ 245,215 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 Satisfactory/Poor P6 Planning Urban Wood Reutilization Planning and design for a storage building, materials staging, fencing, lighting, utilities, and security needs to develop a wood reutilization facility. Plan may include site analysis, alternatives, design for infrastructure and implementation strategies. 69 $ 206,080 $ 206,080 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 7 This plan will allow the City to begin the process of reusing wood from downed, removed trees throughout as playground mulch, building materials, etc. to minimize landfill impacts, and provide sustainable reuse of materials and result in cost savings 3 0 F1 New Mixed-Use Three-Story Fire Prop Salt Lake City Fire Department is seeking funding to procure a three-story mixed-use fire training structure. This structure or prop would be constructed on the department’s training grounds on the west-side of Salt Lake City.68 $ 856,690 $ 856,690 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 P17 Planning Memory Grove Master Plan and Cultural Landscape Report Development of a Master Plan and Cultural Landscape Report for Memory Grove Park. This plan will include robust community engagement, visioning and implementation strategies. These plans will guide future improvements, including treatment and strategies.68 $ 341,320 $ 341,320 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 16 0 C11 Constituent Gateway Triangle Property Park Park and garden development on SLC property between Gateway Community Garden and Grants Tower RR tracks, adjacent to Folsom Trail (under construction). Uses may include Garden expansion, playground, off-leash dog park, active recreation space.68 $ 499,563 $ 499,563 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Park and garden development on SLC property between Gateway Community Garden and Grants Tower RR tracks, adjacentto Folsom Trail (under construction). Uses may include Garden expansion, playground, off-leash dog park, active recreationspace. Coupled with the Folsom Trail, this property will provide a connection and access from the Westside. There are no other ped surface connections within two blocks of thisproperty. This tremendous residential growth proximate to this SLC property creates demand:. Uses may include: 1) dog park; 2) playground; 3) garden park; 4) expanded community garden; 5) sport activity; 6) buffer from intense RR activity and noise. Enhances/expands greenspace, promotes active transportation, may expand community garden activities. 0 0 T10 Renewal Multimodal Capital Maintenance These funds hire contractors for specialized maintenance of infrastructure for which SLC does not have the equipment or staff. Examples: enhanced crosswalks, bike lanes, bike racks, colored pavement, delineators, radar speed feedback signs, RRFBs, etc. 67 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 5 As a maintenance project that primarily supports walking, bicycling, and transit, its equity impacts are principally about equity among modes-providing renewal for walking, biking, and transit infrastructure that may be excluded from routine maintenance.0 0 P5 Planning Rose Park Open Space Concepts Planning and design for existing Rose Park Golf Course driving range and disc golf course. Project would expand publicly accessible open space and determine preferred site developments and activation improvements for the largest open space along the JRP.66 $ 154,560 $ 154,560 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 This project could provide activation and public access along the JRP, utilized by citywide residents, and visitors. This area also serves communities in high-needs areas as identified by the Needs Assessment. Restoration efforts could reduce env. impacts. Project would expand publicly accessible open space and determine preferred site developments and activation improvements for the largest open space along the JRP 0 0 C2 Constituent Back Alley Block Project After working with the city and the Liberty Wells Community Council to successfully launch the first Alley Pilot Project in September 2021, we'd like to use the same blueprint to rejuvenate an additional 5,000 feet of public alley space in Liberty Wells. 66 $ 517,500 $ 517,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 "The alleys we are looking to rejuvenate through this project have been selected partially based on the economic and racialdiversity of the surrounding neighbors (compared to Liberty Wells at large). We also hope to encourage walking and biking options. Transforming a portion of the 5 miles of public alleys in Liberty Wells into walkable, bikeable, community gathering spaces would strengthen the community by bringing neighbors together, preserving and enhancing existing open spaces, andsupporting art. We also intend to install solar lighting, landscaping, art, and placemaking intitiatives in these alleys. Enhances active transportation/walkability 0 Failed C13 Constituent Lindsey Gardens Natural Springs Pollinator Garden The Lindsey Spring Pollinator Project intends to daylight a natural spring, allowing for native species to flourish and to provide habitat for pollinators and to serve as a learning tool for residents, particularly for nearby Ensign Elementary students.65 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 8 The Lindsey Spring Pollinator Project intends to daylight a natural spring, allowing for native species to flourish and to provide habitat for pollinators and to serve as a learning tool for residents, particularly for nearby Ensign Elementary students It creates a critical habitat ribbon near the urban wildland interface, provides educational opportunities for students, daylights ahistorically significant spring currently diverted to storm drains and improves the psychological health of all. Enhances/supports riparian habitat and wildlife coriddors. 10 0 E7 Renewal Rail Adjacent Pavement Improvements 2022/2023 This program addresses uneven or deteriorated pavement adjacent to railway crossings. Engineering designs pavement improvements and contracts the construction. 65 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3 This program provides improved transitions from roadway to railway on at-grade crossings. These improvements will enhance safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers, reduce potential damage to bikes and vehicles, and reduce noise pollution. Enhances active transportation access/safety. 0 0 C16 Constituent 337 S 400 E Pocket Park Improvement This park has been heavily damaged by recent adjacent construction. This project will fund public engagement and conceptual design to determine the future of the park. The plan will use public feedback for design and include CPTED considerations.64 $ 54,096 $ 54,096 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Creates and enhances public open green space in urban neighborhood undergoing heavy development. 0 0 C15 Constituent Rose Park Community Pump Track The Rose Park pump track project will construct a new community bicycle pump track that would be adjacent to the Day Riverside library along the Jordan River Parkway, near the newly constructed Watershed project within Rose Park neighborhood in SLC. 64 $ 498,584 $ 498,584 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 F2 Renewal Training Ground Site Improvements The fire training ground site improvement includes the excavation and construction of paved areas surrounding fire training props to allow access for firefighters and fire vehicles as they train. There is approximately 45,000 sq. ft. of underutilizes space.64 $ 755,991 $ 755,991 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 Serious C34 Constituent Sunnyside Ave Pedestrian Safety Improvements Vehicle Trip Reduction, Safety Improvement, Neighborhood Center Improvement, Public Health, Critical Infrastructure Improvement of 3 landscaped median islands, 3 crosswalks, west bound bike lane, restriping on Sunnyside Avenue between1350 East and Guardsma 64 $ 514,688 $ 514,688 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Project will enhance safety for pedestrians, promoting active transportation in this area.0 Poor C37 Constituent Yalecrest Traffic Calming The Yalecrest Neighborhood requests traffic calming initiatives to improve safety, reduce speeding and lower the increased volume of traffic along two of its main boundaries -- 1900 East and 1300 East, as well as interior roadways.61 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Project intended to investigate potential traffic calming measures in project area, which may enhance safety for pedestrians and other alternative forms of transportation. 0 Serious/Poor C32 Constituent East Bench Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Safety Traffic calming measures on the East Bench neighborhood's busiest streets to lower speeds and improve bicycle/pedestrian safety.61 $ 467,929 $ 467,929 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 Project will enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists, promoting active transportation in this area. 0 Serious/Poor C12 Constituent Jefferson Park Walking Path Build a lighted walking path around the retention pond berm going around the outside perimeter of the park. Adding fencing around the playground to delineate children's space from other park areas and keep dogs out. Plant additional trees in the park.61 $ 496,472 $ 496,472 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 E5 Planning Project Management Software Renewal The Engineering Division requires funding to renew the annual subscription to Procore project management software.61 $ 79,999 $ 79,999 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 E11 Planning Wingpointe Levee Design This project includes conceptual design, final design, and geotechnical investigations performed by hired consultants. Levee conditions will be evaluated, required improvements identified, and modifications recommended to bring the levee into compliance.59 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 8 Wingpointe levee was modified during golf course construction and does not meet revised FEMA criteria nor current US Army Corps of Engineers standards. The levee must be reconstructed to prevent flooding the neighboring communities. Project mitigates flooding hazard that may be exacerbated by climate related flooding events. 0 0 C24 Constituent Welcome Signage Installation of monument signage (in brick planters, located in the center medians, at multiple entrances to our neighborhood). We want to re-establish our identity within the city & create a sense of pride for those who live here and future residents.57 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 C26 Constituent Mountain Dell Disc Golf Course This project will add a new disc golf course on the vacant parcel next to the Mountain Dell Golf Course. The project will fill the strong need for additional affordable recreational opportunities within our community.57 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 C33 Constituent Sugar House Crosswalk Murals Painting murals on three crosswalks in Sugarhouse (1300 E near Westminster, 2100 S near Highland HS, and a crosswalk at 2100 S 1900 E). This will draw more attention to crosswalks, slow traffic down, and also add more art to the neighborhood.56 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 C18 Constituent First Encampment Park The Park turns 25 in 2022 & upgrades & improvements are needed. Our goals: evaluate & replant vegetation, mend sprinkler system, preserve engraved pioneer names, repair monuments, add historical info, improve safety & develop enhanced information systems.53 $ 363,916 $ 363,916 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3 Maintenance and improvements to public open green space 0 0 C1 Constituent 1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk Install curb and gutter on east side of road, and curb, gutter, and sidewalk on west side of road on 1200 East between Zenith Ave. and Crandall Ave. 53 $ 275,919 $ 275,919 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 2 “This project will make it safer for pedestrians to walk up and down the street, & will allow appropriate drainage so puddles don’t form and wear away/break down the asphalt of the road further or encourage bugs. Road maintenance will be improved." Pedestrian-usage enhancement 0 Satisfactory C4 Constituent South Belaire Dr Road Reconstruction South Belaire Drive is in dire need of road reconstruction. In May 2018, the streets surrounding Belaire Dr were resurfaced, but Belaire Dr. was left out because it was too far gone. Since that time, its condition has only deteriorated.51 $ 699,650 $ 699,650 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 Serious/Failed C8 Constituent Repair Alley #4195 after 9th South rebuild project Repair Alley #4195 from 9th S reconstruction damage from contractor equipment use. Fix failed infrastructure impacting property use, parking, safety and development. There are significant issues with use of alley parking and use of property utilization.48 $ 72,450 $ 72,450 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 Very Poor C3 Constituent Pave Benchmark Circle Benchmark Circle (My street) has not been paved for 35 years per my neighbors who have been here that long. About 5 years ago The city street engineers had rated this street as the number second worst streets in Salt Lake City. It needs to be fixed.44 $ 199,307 $ 199,307 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 Failed C7 Constituent Harvey Milk Blvd. Rainbow Crosswalk Permanent Rainbow coloring of 4 crosswalks along 900 S. or Harvey Milk Blvd, renamed as such in 2016. This project will be an economic development and neighborhood identity landmark for the vibrant Central 9th Neighborhood & honor Harvey Milk 43 $ 459,346 $ 459,346 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 0 C5 Constituent Storm Drains 1100 East South of Zenith Ave Storm drain installation 1100 East from Zenith Ave south on west side.41 $ 92,735 $ 92,735 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 Failed TOTAL $ 40,949,953 $ 31,344,953 $ - $ 800,000 $ 500,000 $ 225,000 $ 2,700,000 $ - $ 5,380,000 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS PAGE FY 2022-23 PROJECTS OVERVIEW 1 FY 2022-23 CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY 5 DEBT SERVICE CIP DEBT SERVICE CIP 17 ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM GENERAL FUND 21 ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM OTHER FUNDS 21 GENERAL FUND MAINTENANCE PROJECTS Bridge Preservation 2022/2023 25 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 400 South Safety Improvements 29 200 South Reconstruction / Transit Corridor Supplement 30 Three Creeks West Roadways 31 300 North Complete Street Reconstruction Supplement 32 Rose Park Neighborhood Center Community Garden 33 Street Improvements 2022/2023 34 Public Lands Asset Management Plan 35 Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments 36 Facilities Asset Renewal Plan FY23 37 Bridge Replacement (650 North over Jordan River)38 Public Way Concrete 2022/2023 39 Alleyway Improvements 2022/2023 40 Urban Farm Development at 2200 West 41 RAC Playground Phase II 42 700 South (Phase 7, 4600 W to 5000 W)43 900 South River Park Soccer Field 44 Memorial Tree Groves Design and Infrastructure 44 Streets Steam Bay Expansion 46 Restoration of CCB Reimburse by Insurance 47 Hand Held Radios 48 Cost Overrun 49 Percent for Art 50 CDBG AND ENTERPRISE FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS CDBG CAPITAL PROJECTS Ballpark Trax Stop Crosswalks on 1300 South 54 400 South Bus Stop Improvements 55 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDEDCIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 TABLE OF CONTENTS AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS Concourse B - Maintenance Facilities and Shell Space 58 Stairs to Access Pedestrian Bridges Roofs 59 Pump House #9 Renovations (Construction)60 Cylinder Saddle Tanks for Runway Deicer Fluid 61 Gate 39 Reconstruction (Construction)62 SkyWest Hangar Taxilane Reconstruction 63 Taxiway E Reconstruction F1-F2 64 South Valley Regional Airport Hangar Site Development 65 South Valley Regional Airport – T-Hangars 66 Skydive Utah Taxilane and Apron 67 South Valley Regional Airport Vitek Hangar Apron Construction 68 Booth 10 Restroom Installation 69 Ground Transportation Staging Lot Study & Modifications 70 Ground Transportation Staging Lot Restroom & EVC Stations 71 Park and Wait Lot Expansion 72 Terminal Front Access Road Improvements 73 Equipment Storage Building (Construction)74 Replace PVC Roof Membrane on NS1 (Roads & Grounds Maint Bldg)75 Replace PVC Roof & Greenhouse Panels on NS14 76 Electrical & Communications Duct Bank from AOC to Gate 7 77 Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (FY2023)78 South Employee Parking Lot Development Program (Design)79 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS Tee Box Leveling 83 Pump Replacement 84 Maintenance Equipment 85 Short Course Design 86 Property Fencing Project 87 New Construction Projects 88 Building Improvements 89 Cart Path Improvements 90 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS Water Main Replacements 92 Treatment Plant Improvements 93 Deep Pump Wells 94 Meter Change-Out Programs 95 Water Service Connections 96 Storage Reservoirs 97 Pumping Plants & Pump Houses 98 Culverts, Flumes & Bridges 99 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDEDCIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 TABLE OF CONTENTS Distribution Reservoirs (Tanks)100 Landscaping 101 Treatment Plants 102 Collection Lines 103 Lift Stations 104 Storm Drain Lines 105 Riparian Corridor Improvements 106 Landscaping 107 Storm Water Lift Stations 108 Street Lighting Projects 109 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CAPITAL PROJECTS Japantown 112 Main Street Closure 113 West Capitol Hill Projects 114 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDEDCIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 TABLE OF CONTENTS This page has been intentionally left blank CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Introduction and Overview Salt Lake City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a multi-year planning program of capital expenditures needed to replace or expand the City’s public infrastructure. The principal element that guides the City in determining the annual infrastructure improvements and budgets schedule is the current fiscal year capital budget. The City CIP Budget Process includes a review by the Community Development Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) Board, consisting of community residents from each district. The CDCIP Board scores projects on a variety of criteria and provides funding recommendations to the Mayor. The Mayor considers the CDCIP recommendations as the Administration prepares its funding recommendations for the City Council as part of the Annual Recommended Budget. The City Council reviews the recommendations of the Mayor and the CDCIP Board and carefully analyzes each of the proposed projects before allocating funding and adopting the final CIP budget. The details of the recommended FY 2022-23 CIP Budget are included in this book. In considering major capital projects, the City looks at the potential operating impact of each project. New capital improvements often entail ongoing expenses for routine operations. Upon completion or acquisition, the repair and maintenance of new facilities often require additional positions to maintain the new infrastructure. Conversely, a positive contribution, such as a reduction in ongoing repairs and maintenance of a capital project, is factored into the decision-making process. Each project includes a section for estimated future maintenance and/or operations expenses, where the departments have included projections of any increases to future operating costs. The City also reviews all CIP projects to determine the progress. All projects older than three years that do not show significant progress are then considered for recapture, allowing those funds to be used on more shovel-ready projects. The Administration continuously evaluates the City’s funding of its Capital Improvement Program. Because the proceeds from debt financing are considered a source for funding the City’s capital improvement projects, the City analyzes the effect issuance that additional debt would have on its debt capacity and current debt ratio. Salt Lake City Resolution No. 29 of 2017 / Salt Lake City Council Capital and Debt Management Policies Resolution No. 29 of 2017 provides the framework for project funding recommendations. Its guidance helps clarify the expectations of the City’s Capital Improvement Program and the steps the Administration should take in determining how to best address the City’s deferred and long-term maintenance needs. Some of the policies guiding the CDCIP Board and the Administration include: – A definition of a capital improvement as having a useful life of five or more years and cannot have a recurring capital outlay such as a motor vehicle or a fire engine. It also clarifies that a capital outlay does not include maintenance expenses such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches. – A capital improvement must be a City asset and have a cost of $50,000 or more, with few exceptions. – Salt Lake City aims to maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect its capital investments and minimize maintenance and replacement costs. – Priorities given to projects that preserve and protect the health and safety of the community; are mandated by the state and/or federal government and provide for the renovation of existing facilities resulting in the preservation of the community’s prior investment. – The recapture of Capital Improvement Program funds during the first budget amendment of each year if an existing balance remains on a completed project.– Debt Service (excluding G.O. Bonding) MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 1 FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Allocations Salt Lake City’s FY 2022-23 recommended CIP budget appropriates $345,912,595 for CIP, utilizing General Funds, Class “C” Funds, Impact Fee Funds, Quarter Cent Tax Funds, Redevelopment Agency Funds, Enterprise Funds, and other public and private funds. The City’s General Fund accounts for all debt service on outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds through a payment from the City CIP contribution, except for the Eccles Theater project. The Library Fund covers the Local Building Authority Lease Revenue bonds for Glendale and Marmalade Libraries while debt associated with the construction of two fire stations is funded through the General Fund. Funds to pay debt service are included in the recommended annual budget of $10,243,296. Outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds financed a variety of the City’s capital improvement projects. A total of $17,189,536 was recommended for transportation infrastructure, rehabilitation, and capital improvement of deteriorated streets city-wide. Of this amount, the major budget appropriations are $6,157,034 general fund, $3,000,000 of Class “C” fund, $1,522,000 of Impact Fee funds, and $5,000,000 in ¼ Cent Tax funding. Such projects include transportation safety improvements, Complete Streets Reconstruction, alleyway improvements, and bridge replacement. The recommended budget for Parks, Trails, and Open Space capital improvement projects includes a total appropriation of $4,043,393 from various funding sources. This includes a variety of enhancements in RAC, urban farm development, community gardens, memorial tree groves and the development of a Public Lands Asset Management Plan. Public Facilities' capital improvement recommended budget includes a total appropriation of $1,790,149 from the general fund for improvements listed in the Facilities Capital Asset Replacement Program to retire long overdue deferred capital replacement projects and an expansion to the Streets Steam Bay. Capital Projects The CIP pages include details for each recommended project the for the FY 2022-23 Budget. These pages provide a breakout of the funding recommendations and future costs associated with each project. The total for capital projects funded from CIP submissions in the FY 2022-23 budget is $ $21,230,070. Additionally, the budget recognizes $2.0 million for repairs to the City and County Building, from funds that will be reimbursed through the City's insurance provider, and $3.7 million for the citywide radio system from funding set aside in fiscal year 2022. The combined total for CIP is $26,930,070. Maintenance Projects The recommended CIP budget consists of projects that meet the City’s definition of CIP of over $50,000 (for capitalization) but are ongoing in nature. These funds help maintain capital investments, ensure longevity, and decrease the need for new capital expenditures to replace the City’s current valuable assets. The Administration has reviewed each project and determined if it was a new capital expenditure or an ongoing maintenance project. The CIP pages provide any maintenance details. The total funding recommended for FY 2022-23 maintenance projects is $2,173,008. CDBG and Enterprise Fund Projects Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program supports community development activities to build stronger and more resilient communities. To support community development, activities are identified through an ongoing process. Activities may address needs such as infrastructure, economic development projects, public facilities installation, community centers, housing rehabilitation, public services, clearance/acquisition, microenterprise assistance, code enforcement, homeowner assistance, etc. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 2 In the Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget CDBG funds are allocated for CIP infrastructure projects to improve safety and meet ADA requirements. The projects were selected through the FY2022-23 CDBG selection process and are aligned with goals and objectives outlined in Salt Lake City’s Housing Plan, Growing SLC, and the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. Enterprise Funds The City’s enterprise functions; Airport, Water, Sewer, Storm Water, Redevelopment, Refuse Collection and Golf – are by nature, very capital intensive. The budgets for these activities reflect the need to maintain the integrity and capacity of the current capital infrastructure and its functionality. Airport Fund – The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive any general fund revenues to support the operation of the City’s system of airports. The Department of Airports has 619 full-time employee positions and is responsible for managing, developing, and promoting airports that provide quality transportation facilities and services, and a convenient travel experience. The FY 2022-23 budget is the Airport's first budget that is focused on moving past the financial impacts of Covid-19 as enplanements traffic and revenues are set to exceed those levels prior to the global pandemic. The Salt Lake City International Airport continues to benefit from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) as well as the recently announced Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL). These grants will continue to offset operating and maintenance expenses that will lower the landing fee and terminal rents charged in FY 2022-23 as well as provide much needed and critical funding for airport capital infrastructure projects. Passenger demand continues to increase on a monthly basis, and as such, the Department of Airports will act prudently in managing the FY 2022-23 budget and look for ways to continue to save operating and capital expenses where feasible, while also looking for ways to strengthen our revenues. The developed FY 2022-23 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits with increased passengers and revenues that help offset increased operating expenses. The Department of Airports will continue to fund important capital projects. These projects include the Terminal Redevelopment Program (TRP) and the North Concourse Program (NCP), which together are called the New SLC. In addition, critical projects found in the airfield, terminal, and auxiliary airports will continue to be funded to ensure that all Airport owned facilities keep up with critical infrastructure to support the growth we are currently experiencing as well as the growth we are projecting into future years. Public Utilities Funds – Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) has four distinct utilities, water, sewer, storm water, and street lighting. Each utility is operated as a separate enterprise fund. Tax money is not used to fund these services. Funding for SLCDPU capital expenditures comes from user fees, fund reserves, revenue bonds, and occasionally a grant. The department is utilizing a Water Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan to finance a portion of the water reclamation facility construction. Customers pay for the services they receive through utility rates that have been established for each fund. The rates were developed on a cost-of-service basis. The City's utilities are infrastructure intensive, and administration of these assets requires long term project and financial planning. The SLCDPU capital budget is shown by fund with subcategory cost centers under each. In FY 2022-23, the department has over 150 capital projects between the four funds as well as continuing work on existing projects. Many of the capital projects in Public Utilities cover multiple fiscal years. It is common for projects designed in one year and be constructed in subsequent years. The budget includes projects rated as a high priority in the Department’s Capital Asset Program (CAP). The replacement of the water reclamation facility is the largest project undertaken by SLCDPU. Other elements of our systems are also experiencing aging problems and will require increasing attention in the future. For example, our three water treatment plants were built in the 1950’s and early 60’s. Planning is underway for each of the three plants to determine the best approaches for their replacement. A unique aspect of capital projects in SLCDPU is that Federal, State, and local regulations affect many of our priorities. Adding to the complexity are water rights and exchange agreement obligations. RDA Funds – The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (RDA) strengthens neighborhoods and commercial districts to improve livability, create economic opportunity and foster authentic, equitable communities. The RDA MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 3 utilizes a powerful set of financial and planning tools to support strategic development projects that enhance the City’s housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public spaces, and environmental sustainability. The RDA’s primary source of funds for the projects include property tax increment and program income revenue, depending on the specific budget account. The RDA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or construction of city owned infrastructure projects. As part of the RDA Budget Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that anticipates multi-year funding. The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval process and is typically contingent on the RDA Board authorizing appropriation once the specific projects costs and details are known. Depending on the project, the timeline for this process may not follow the City’s CIP schedule or requirements for approval. The RDA FY 2022-23 budget process proposes three potential City infrastructure projects. The Japantown project is an allocation of funds to support implementation of the Design Strategy. Improvements could include infrastructure, utility work, lighting, site furniture, public art, etc. The Main Street project is an allocation of funds to support the transition of Main Street to a pedestrian-first promenade. Funds would primarily be used to hire a consultant to provide design/planning work, code analysis, phasing, and stakeholder engagement. The West Capitol Hill project provides additional funds to current projects which includes construction of Marmalade Plaza, a public open space and mid-block connection adjacent to the Marmalade Library. Sustainability Fund - Sustainability operations enable continuing compliance with federal, stand and local regulations related to landfill gas collection, closing portions of the landfill, and constructing a new landfill cell within the permitted footprint included in the master plan. Sustainability proposed no projects for FY 2022-23. Golf Fund - The Golf Division operates seven full-service golf courses at six Salt Lake City locations providing quality recreational experiences at a competitive price for Salt Lake City residents and visitors from surrounding cities and various out of state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily, from excess revenue generated by user fees. Over the past several years, expenses have outpaced revenues and have limited Golf’s ability to self-fund most if not all non-emergency Capital Projects. In 2012, a Golf CIP Fund was established that allocates $1 per every 9 holes played and 9% from all annual pass sales toward building funds that can be used exclusively for Capital Projects. Until FY 2018-19, these funds had not been released for use as the fund balance was needed to provide a fund balance offset against a fund deficit. As part of the FY 2021-22 budget proposal, the Golf Division implemented a Golf CIP Fee increase from $1 to $2 per every 9 holes played, beginning in January 2022, in order to bring more capital into the Golf CIP Fund to increase funding from this source for additional future projects. As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will be using $856,502 in FY 2022-23 to purchase additional equipment. The Golf Division has budgeted $4,050,000 for Capital Improvement Projects in FY 2022-23. The Golf Division is undertaking a four-year project to improve tee box hitting surfaces by re-leveling and re-sodding many of the tee box areas at each course and have allocated $60,000 in FY 2022-23 from the Golf CIP Fund. The Golf Division is undertaking a multi-year project to repair existing cart paths and construct some new carts paths and has allocated $950,000 for FY 2022-23. Other significant projects include new HVAC system at the Mountain Dell clubhouse, Roof improvements at the Nibley Park clubhouse, On-course restrooms at Nibley Park, Forest Dale and Glendale golf courses. The Golf Division is anticipating receiving a matching federal WaterSMART grant to assist in funding a new irrigation system at the Rose Park Golf Course. The award should be announced in May of 2022. If the grant is not awarded, approximately $2 million of CIP projects will be suspended to help fund the Rose Park irrigation system. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 4 Deb t S e r v i c e Debt Service Projects Sales Tax Series 2012A Bond $ 2,500 $ 2,500 Sales Tax Series 2013B Bond $ 363,660 $ 363,660 Sales Tax Series 2014B Bond $ 749,937 $ 749,937 Sales Tax Series 2016A Bond $ 2,014,623 $ 2,014,623 Sales Tax Series 2019 A Bond $ 365,285 $ 365,285 Sales Tax Series 2021 Bond (Refunding 2013B, LBA2013A & 2014A) $ 476,422 $ 476,422 Sales Tax Series 2022 Bond $ 4,393,161 $ 4,393,161 B & C Roads Series 2014 $ 981,208 $ 981,208 ESCO Debt Service $ 896,500 $ 896,500 Debt Service Projects Total $ 10,243,296 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,243,296 Ong o i n g Ongoing Projects Crime Lab $ 600,000 $ 600,000 Facilities Maintenance $ 350,000 $ 350,000 Public Lands Maintenance $ 250,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,250,000 Community and Neighborhoods - Maintenance $ 700,000 $ 700,000 Ongoing Projects Total $ 1,900,000 $ 2,000,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,900,000 Oth e r O n g o i n g Other Ongoing Complete Streets $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 Public Services- Smiths Ballfield $ 154,000 $ 154,000 Public Services- ESCO County Steiner $ 148,505 $ 148,505 Public Services - Memorial House $ 68,554 $ 68,554 Other Ongoing $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,000,000 $ 371,059 $ 3,371,059 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2023 PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 5 Mai n t e n a n c e Bridge Preservation 2022/2023 $ 108,008 $ 65,000 $ 173,008 Maintenance Funded Projects Total $ 108,008 $ 65,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 173,008 New C I P New/Maintenance Projects Total 400 South Safety Improvements $ 513,313 $ 513,313 200 South Reconstruction / Transit Corridor Supplement $ 2,700,242 $ 2,643 $ 252,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 4,254,885 Three Creeks West Roadways $ 1,359,130 $ 1,359,130 300 North Complete Street Reconstruction Supplement $ 500,000 $ 40,000 $ 540,000 Rose Park Neighborhood Center Community Garden $ 160,819 $ 160,819 Street Improvements 2022/2023 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 Public Lands Asset Management Plan $ 160,160 $ 160,160 Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments $ 990,000 $ 110,000 $ 1,100,000 Facilities Asset Renewal Plan FY23 $ 1,192,357 $ 1,192,357 Bridge Replacement (650 North over Jordan River) $ 3,700,000 $ 3,700,000 Public Way Concrete 2022/2023 $ 436,281 $ 436,281 Alleyway Improvements 2022/2023 $ 142,919 $ 142,919 Urban Farm Development at 2200 West $ 425,040 $ 425,040 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2023 PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 6 New C I P ( C o n t i n u e d ) RAC Playground Phase II $ 521,564 $ 521,564 700 South (Phase 7, 4600 W to 5000 W)$ 850,000 $ 1,120,000 $ 1,970,000 900 South River Park Soccer Field $ 287,848 $ 287,848 Memorial Tree Groves Design and Infrastructure $ 867,962 $ 867,962 Streets Steam Bay Expansion $ 597,792 $ 597,792 Restoration of CCB Reimburse by Insurance $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Hand Held Radios $ 3,700,000 $ 3,700,000 New Projects Total $ 12,534,877 $ 3,035,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,360,193 $ 5,000,000 $ -$ 26,930,070 Cost Overrun $ 208,143 $ 208,143 Percent for Art $ 156,107 $ 156,107 Total General Fund/Other Fund/Class C Fund/Impact Fee Fund/CDBG Fund/Surplus Land Fund CIP Projects. $ 25,150,431 $ 5,100,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,360,193 $ 8,000,000 $ 371,059 $ 44,981,683 CDB G City Infrastructure Projects ( CIP Engineering/Transportation)Ballpark Trax Stop Crosswalks on 1300 South $ 550,000 $ 550,000 400 South Bus Stop Improvements $ 172,000 $ 172,000 Total CDBG $ 722,000 $ 722,000 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2023 PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 7 Other Fund Capital Improvement Programs Air p o r t Airport CIP Projects Concourse B - Maintenance Facilities and Shell Space $ 5,290,000 $ 5,290,000 Stairs to Access Pedestrian Bridges Roofs $ 153,000 $ 153,000 Pump House #9 Renovations (Construction)$ 463,000 $ 463,000 Cylinder Saddle Tanks for Runway Deicer Fluid $ 379,000 $ 379,000 Gate 39 Reconstruction (Construction)$ 2,318,000 $ 2,318,000 SkyWest Hangar Taxilane Reconstruction $ 934,000 $ 934,000 Taxiway E Reconstruction F1-F2 $ 6,469,000 $ 6,469,000 South Valley Regional Airport Hangar Site Development $ 3,018,000 $ 3,018,000 South Valley Regional Airport – T-Hangars $ 4,235,500 $ 4,235,500 Skydive Utah Taxilane and Apron $ 490,000 $ 490,000 South Valley Regional Airport Vitek Hangar Apron Construction $ 459,000 $ 459,000 Booth 10 Restroom Installation $ 265,000 $ 265,000 Ground Transportation Staging Lot Study & Modifications $ 153,000 $ 153,000 Ground Transportation Staging Lot Restroom & EVC Stations $ 678,000 $ 678,000 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2023 PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 8 Air p o r t ( C o n t i n u e d ) Park and Wait Lot Expansion $ 1,413,000 $ 1,413,000 Terminal Front Access Road Improvements $ 2,037,000 $ 2,037,000 Equipment Storage Building (Construction)$ 3,923,000 $ 3,923,000 Replace PVC Roof Membrane on NS1 (Roads & Grounds Maint Bldg) $ 337,000 $ 337,000 Replace PVC Roof & Greenhouse Panels on NS14 $ 76,000 $ 76,000 Electrical & Communications Duct Bank from AOC to Gate 7 $ 5,746,000 $ 5,746,000 Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (FY2023)$ 477,000 $ 477,000 South Employee Parking Lot Development Program (Design) $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Total Airport CIP Projects $ 41,813,500 $ 41,813,500 Gol f Golf CIP Projects Tee Box Leveling $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Pump Replacement $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Maintenance Equipment $ 856,502 $ 856,502 Short Course Design $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Property Fencing Project $ 100,000 $ 100,000 New Construction Projects $ 1,525,000 $ 1,525,000 Building Improvements $ 820,000 $ 820,000 Cart Path Improvements $ 1,475,000 $ 1,475,000 Total Golf CIP Projects $ 4,906,502 $ 4,906,502 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2023 PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 9 Pub l i c U t i l i t i e s Public Utilities CIP Projects Water Main Replacements $ 16,893,000 $ 16,893,000 Treatment Plant Improvements $ 9,200,000 $ 9,200,000 Deep Pump Wells $ 996,000 $ 996,000 Meter Change-Out Programs $ 3,100,000 $ 3,100,000 Water Service Connections $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000 Storage Reservoirs $ 2,125,000 $ 2,125,000 Pumping Plants & Pump Houses $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Culverts, Flumes & Bridges $ 1,615,000 $ 1,615,000 Distribution Reservoirs (Tanks)$ 1,410,000 $ 1,410,000 Landscaping $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Treatment Plants $ 178,739,910 $ 178,739,910 Collection Lines $ 24,385,000 $ 24,385,000 Lift Stations $ 2,760,000 $ 2,760,000 Storm Drain Lines $ 4,625,000 $ 4,625,000 Riparian Corridor Improvements $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Landscaping $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Storm Water Lift Stations $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Street Lighting Projects $ 2,240,000 $ 2,240,000 Total Public Utilities CIP Projects $ 252,838,910 $ 252,838,910 RDA Redevelopment Agency (RDA) CIP Projects Japantown $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Main Street Closure $ 300,000 $ 300,000 West Capitol Hill Projects $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Total RDA CIP Projects $ 650,000 $ 650,000 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2023 PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 10 Sus t a i n a b i l i t y Sustainability CIP Projects $ - Total Sustainability CIP Projects $ -$ - Total Enterprise and Other Fund CIP $ 300,930,912 $ 300,930,912 GRAND TOTAL $ 25,150,431 $ 5,100,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,360,193 $ 8,000,000 $ 301,301,971 $ 345,912,595 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2023 PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 11 Salt Lake City Impact Fee Summary Fiscal Year 2023 PROJECT Parks Impact Fee Streets Impact Fee Police Impact Fee Fire Impact Fee TOTAL Imp a c t F e e s Impact Fee Projects Fire Station #3 483,233 483,233 Fire Station #14 500,900 500,900 400 South Viaduct Trail 90,000 90,000 1700 South Corridor Transformation 35,300 35,300 Glendale Waterpark Master Plan & Landscape Rehabilitation & Active Recreation Component 3,200,000 3,200,000 Transportation Safety Improvements 44,400 44,400 Three Creeks West Bank New Park 150,736 150,736 900 South 9Line RR Crossing 28,000 28,000 Urban Trails 6,500 6,500 200 South Transit Complete Street Supplement 37,422 37,422 Local Link Construction 50,000 50,000 Neighborhood Byways 104,500 104,500 900 South Signal Improvements 70,000 70,000 Corridor Transformations 25,398 25,398 SLC Foothills Land Acquisitions 425,000 425,000 Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathways 510,000 510,000 SLC Foothills Trailhead Development 1,304,682 1,304,682 Downtown Green Loop Implementation: Design for 200 East linear Park 610,000 610,000 Historic Structure Renovation & Activation at Allen Park 420,000 420,000 RAC Playground with Shade Sails 180,032 180,032 Total Impact Fee by Type 6,800,450 491,520 — 984,133 8,276,103 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 12 Salt Lake City Unfunded Projects FY 2023 Unf u n d e d P r o j e c t s Constituent 3000 South Sidewalk and Curb 3000 S Highland Dr to 1500 E 449,315 449,315 Engineering Logan Ave Reconstruction Logan Avenue from 1700 East to 2000 East and 2000 East from 1700 South to Bryan Avenue 1,405,000 1,405,000 Engineering Bridge Replacement (200 South over Jordan River)200 South over Jordan River (Approx. 1220 West 200 South) 3,500,000 3,500,000 Engineering Bridge Rehabilitation (400 South and 650 North over Jordan River) 400 South & 650 North over Jordan River 3,000,000 3,000,000 Engineering Wingpointe Levee Design Jordan River Surplus Canal between 3700 West North Temple Drive and Terminal Drive 800,000 800,000 Constituent Three Creeks West Bank Roadways 1300 S. 1000 W.1,158,422 1,158,422 Facilities Delong Salt Storage 719 S Delong St 1,504,427 1,504,427 Facilities Steam Bay 1910 West 500 South 363,495 363,495 Fire Mixed-Use Three Story Prop 1600 South Industrial Rd.815,895 815,895 Fire Training Ground Site Improvements 1600 South Industrial Rd.694,785 694,785 Constituent Sunnyside Park Sidewalk Valdez Drive 72,740 72,740 Constituent Winner on Wasatch Dee Glan Tennis Court Construction 1216 S. Wasatch Drive 500,000 500,000 Constituent Lighting Upgrade at Liberty Park Tennis Center 1105 S Constitution Dr.202,100 202,100 Constituent Liberty Park & Wasatch Hills Tennis Court Resurfacing 1105 S Constitution Dr.300,000 300,000 Constituent Harrison Ave and 700 E Community Garden 1300 S. 700 E.103,500 103,500 Constituent 1300 South Camping Resistant Landscaping 1300 South between Main and West Temple 100,000 100,000 Constituent Wingate Walkway 475 N. Redwood Road 286,750 286,750 Constituent 1200 East Median 1200 East bet. So. Temple & 200 S. and 300 S & 500 S.500,000 500,000 Parks & Public Lands Parleys Historic Nature Park Structure Preservation 2740 South 2700 East 765,325 765,325 Parks & Public Lands Enhancement of the Cemetery for Visitor Research and Knowledge 200 N Street 790,000 790,000 Parks & Public Lands Cemetery Roadway Improvements, Phase 1 200 N Street 3,838,000 3,838,000 Parks & Public Lands 9Line and Rose Park Asphalt Pump Tracks 700 West 900 South & 900 North Cornell Avenue 1,393,600 1,393,600 Organization Name Proposal Title Project Address Location General Fund Impact Fee Total MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 13 Unf u n d e d P r o j e c t s ( C o n t i n u e d ) Parks & Public Lands Richmond Park Playground and Park improvements 440 East 600 South 690,000 690,000 Parks & Public Lands Library Square Feasibility, Civic Engagement and Design Development Block 37, bounded by 400 South, 300 East, 500 South and 200 East 225,000 225,000 Parks & Public Lands Donner & Rotary Glen Park Community Park Irrigation & Landscape Design and Construction 2850 East Sunnyside & 2903 E Kennedy Drive 650,000 650,000 Constituent Capitol Hill Traffic Calming Various 595,194 595,194 Constituent Harvard Heights Residential Concrete Street Reconstruction Harvard Ave bet. 1300 & 1500 East 1,311,920 1,311,920 Constituent Liberty Wells Traffic Calming Kensington, Bryan, and Milton Avenues (600 East to 700 East) and 600 East (Kensington Ave to 1700 South) 400,000 400,000 Constituent Stratford Bike Crossing 1700 E. Stratford 200,000 200,000 Constituent Sugar House Safe Side Streets 900 East on the west, 2100 South on the south, 1100 East on the east, and Garfield Avenue on the north 500,000 500,000 Transportation Sunnyside 9Line Trail Missing Piece 1805 to 1851 East Sunnyside Avenue.350,000 350,000 Transportation Multimodal Intersections & Signals Various 945,000 105,000 1,050,000 Total Unfunded CIP Projects 27,016,868 1,498,600 28,515,468 Organization Name Proposal Title Project Address Location General Fund Impact Fee Total MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS 14 This page has been intentionally left blank Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $2,500 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds June 2012 4-01-2022 RDA Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, were issued in June 2012 for the purpose of constructing and improving various City roads, including the replacement of the North Temple Viaduct and improving North Temple Boulevard. The bonds were issued with a par amount of $15,855,000. The debt service is currently mostly funded by tax increment revenue from the RDA. General Fund pays debt service when the tax increment revenue does not fully cover the debt service. The 2012A Bonds were fully refunded with the Series 2022A Bonds.. The budget for 2023 is to pay the final arbitrage calculation fees. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $363,660 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds November 2013 10-01-2023 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B, were issued in November 2013 for the purpose of financing a portion of the costs of the Sugarhouse Streetcar, and to pay for a portion of various improvements to create a “greenway” within the corridor. The total par amount of bonds issued was $7,315,000. A portion of the Series 2013B Bonds were refunded with the Series 2021 Bonds. As of June 30, 2022, $690,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on October 1, 2023. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $749,937 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds September 2014 10-01-2034 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B, were issued in September 2014 for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, remodeling, and improving of various City buildings, parks, property and roads. The Series 2014B bonds were issued with a par amount of $10,935,000. As of June 30, 2022, $7,955,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on October 1, 2034. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 DEBT SERVICE CIP 17 Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $2,014,623 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds June 2016 10-01-2028 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A, were issued in June 2016 to refund a portion of the Series 2009A Bonds. The Series 2009A Bonds were originally issued to finance all or a portion of the acquisition, construction, improvement and remodel of the new Public Services maintenance facility, a building for use as City offices and other capital improvements within the City. Fleet contributes 13.9%, Refuse contributes 13%, and the general fund contributes 73.1% of the debt service on the Maintenance Facility Program portion of the bonds. The Series 2016A bonds were issued with a par amount of $21,715,000. As of June 30 2022, $15,920,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on October 1, 2028. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $365,285 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds December 2019 04-01-2027 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A, were issued in December 2019 to refund a portion of the Series 2007A Bonds. The Series 2007A Bonds were originally issued to fund the TRAX Extension to the Intermodal Hub and Grant Tower improvements to realign rail lines near downtown. The Series 2019A bonds were issued with a par amount of $2,620,000. As of June 30, 2022, $1,555,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature April 1, 2027. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $476,422 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds December 2019 10-01-2034 General Fund/Library Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021, were issued in December 2021 to refund a portion of the Series 2013A Bonds and a portion of the LBA Series 2013A and 2014A Bonds. The Series 2021 bonds were issued with a par amount of $15,045,000. As of June 30, 2022, $15,045,000 in principal remains outstanding. A portion of the debt service is paid by the Library for the LBA 2013A and 2014A (Glendale and Marmalade libraries). MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 DEBT SERVICE CIP 18 Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature October 1, 2034. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022A 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $4,393,161 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds January 2022 10-01-2032 RDA Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022A, were issued in January 2022 to refund the Series 2012A Bonds. The Series 2012A Bonds were originally issued to fund the construction and improvement various City roads, including the replacement of the North Temple Viaduct and improving North Temple Boulevard. The Series 2022A bonds were issued with a par amount of $8,900,000. As of June 30, 2022, $8,900,000 in principal remains outstanding. The debt service is currently mostly funded by tax increment revenue from the RDA. General Fund pays debt service when the tax increment revenue does not fully cover the debt service. Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature October 1, 2032. Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $981,208 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds August 2014 04-01-2024 Class C The Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014, were issued in August 2014 for the purpose of constructing and repairing 13th South Street from State Street to 4th West, and from State Street to 5th West, and 17th South Street from State Street to 700 East. The Series 2014 bonds were issued with a par amount of $8,800,000. As of June 30, 2022, $1,900,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on April 1, 2024. ESCO Lease Debt Service 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $82,500 Capital Lease December 2019 March 2026 General Fund This lease provides energy efficient equipment to Public Services Facilities Division. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 DEBT SERVICE CIP 19 ESCO Steiner Lease Debt Service 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $148,500 Capital Lease January 2013 July 2029 County $148,500 Capital Lease January 2013 July 2029 General Fund This lease was entered into by Public Services to acquire energy efficient equipment for Steiner. Since the costs of this facility is shared 50% with the County, the County pays 50% of this lease payment. ESCO Parks Lease Debt Service 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $517,000 Capital Lease August 2012 March 2026 General Fund This lease was entered into by Public Services to acquire energy efficient equipment for city parks. Crime Lab Improvements Capital Lease Debt 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $600,000 Capital Lease March 2015 September 2021 General Fund This capital lease provided the funding for the improvements to the leased space for the Crime Evidence Lab. Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $497,950 LBA Lease Revenue Bonds March 2016 04-15-2037 General Fund The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City (LBA of SLC) issued the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A in March 2016 for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction costs of the Fire Station #14 Project. The Series 2016A bonds were issued with a par amount of $6,755,000. As of June 30, 2022, $5,490,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on April 15. Interest is due semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. The bonds mature on April 15, 2037. Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $676,075 LBA Lease Revenue Bonds April 2017 04-15-2038 General Fund The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City (LBA of SLC) issued the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A in April 2017 for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction costs of the Fire Station #3 Project. The Series 2017A bonds were issued with a par amount of $8,115,000. As of June 30, 2022, $7,260,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on April 15. Interest is due semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. The bonds mature on April 15, 2038. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 DEBT SERVICE CIP 20 ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM GENERAL FUND Crime Lab Rental Payments 2023 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $600,000 General Fund Yearly Rental payments for Crime Evidence Lab Facilities Maintenance 2023 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $350,000 General Fund The Facilities ongoing CIP funding will be used to replace a variety of capital assets. The purpose is to stop problems early on and prevent larger catastrophic failures of equipment and systems in the City’s building stock. Public Lands Maintenance 2023 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $2,250,000 General Fund The Parks ongoing CIP funding will be used to replace a variety of capital assets. The purpose is to stop problems early on and prevent larger failures in the City’s park stock. Percent for Art 2023 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $156,107 General Fund To provide enhancements such as decorative pavement, railings, sculptures and other works of art. (1% of CIP) Cost Overrun 2023 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $208,143 General Fund ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM OTHER SOURCES Smith Ballfield Naming Rights 2023 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $154,000 Other -Donations Two parts to this request - to establish budget within the 83 fund to accept the revenue received for the naming rights pertaining to Smith Baseball Field and to establish an expense within the 83 fund to continue addressing the deferred maintenance backlog in this facility. This building was completed in 1990 and is now 27 yrs. old. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 DEBT SERVICE CIP 21 CIP Memorial House 2023 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $68,554 Other - Rental A revenue cost center has been established to receive revenue payments from the Utah Heritage Foundation. Monthly payments are received and are to be re-invested in the facility to maintain the property. Plans for the use of the funding is to be determined. Real Estate Services – Surplus Land 2023 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $700,000 General Fund Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B 2023 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source Don’t need for CIP Sales Tax Rev Bonds October 2019 04-01-2038 RDA Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013A, were issued in October 2013 for the purpose of financing a portion of the costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping a performing arts center and related improvements. The Series 2013A Bonds were refunded with the Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B. The RDA pays the full amount of the debt service for the Series 2019B bonds. However, if the RDA is unable to pay any of the debt service, the City’s General Fund would be responsible for it. The total par amount of bonds issued was $58,540,000. The refunding resulted in a net present value savings of $6,396,905. As of June 30, 2022, $57,270,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on April 1, 2038. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 DEBT SERVICE CIP 22 This page has been intentionally left blank MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND MAINTENANCE PROJECTS 25 This page has been intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 29 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 30 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 31 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 32 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 33 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 34 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 35 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 36 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 37 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 38 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 39 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 40 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 41 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 42 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 43 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 44 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 45 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 46 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 47 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 48 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 49 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 50 This page has been intentionally left blank Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program supports community development activities to build stronger and more resilient communities. To support community development, activities are identified through an ongoing process. Activities may address needs such as infrastructure, economic development projects, public facilities installation, community centers, housing rehabilitation, public services, clearance/acquisition, microenterprise assistance, code enforcement, homeowner assistance, etc. In the Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget CDBG funds are allocated for CIP infrastructure projects to improve safety and meet ADA requirements. The projects were selected through the FY2023 CDBG selection process and are aligned with goals and objectives outlined in Salt Lake City’s Housing Plan, Growing SLC, and the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CDBG CAPITAL PROJECTS 53 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CDBG CAPITAL PROJECTS 54 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 CDBG CAPITAL PROJECTS 55 This page has been intentionally left blank The Department of Airports The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive any general fund revenues to support the operation of the City’s system of airports. The Department of Airports has 619 full-time employee positions and is responsible for managing, developing, and promoting airports that provide quality transportation facilities and services, and a convenient travel experience. The Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget is the airports first budget that is focused on moving past the financial impacts of Covid-19 as enplanement traffic and revenues are set to exceed those levels prior to the global pandemic. The Salt Lake City International Airport continues to benefit from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) as well as the recently announced Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL). These grants will continue to offset operating and maintenance expenses that will lower the landing fee and terminal rents charged in FY 2022-23 as well as provide much needed and critical funding for airport capital infrastructure projects. Passenger demand continues to increase on a monthly basis, and as such, the Department of Airports will act prudently in managing the FY 2022-23 budget and look for ways to continue to save operating and capital expenses where feasible, while also looking for ways to strengthen our revenues. The developed FY 2022-23 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits with increased passengers and revenues that help offset increased operating expenses. The Department of Airports will continue to fund important capital projects. These projects include the Terminal Redevelopment Program (TRP) and the North Concourse Program (NCP), which together are called the New SLC. In addition critical projects found in the airfield, terminal, and auxiliary airports will continue to be funded to ensure that all Airport owned facilities keep up with critical infrastructure to support the growth we are currently experiencing as well as the growth we are projecting into future years. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 57 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 58 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 59 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 60 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 61 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 62 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 63 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 64 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 65 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 66 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 67 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 68 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 69 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 70 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 71 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 72 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 73 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 74 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 75 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 76 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 77 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 78 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS 79 This page has been intentionally left blank The Salt Lake City Golf Division The Golf Division operates seven full-service golf courses at six Salt Lake City locations providing quality recreational experiences at a competitive price for Salt Lake City residents and visitors from surrounding cities and various out of state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily, from excess revenue generated by user fees. Over the past several years, expenses have outpaced revenues and have limited Golf’s ability to self-fund most if not all non-emergency Capital Projects. In 2012, a Golf CIP Fund was established that allocates $1 per every 9 holes played and 9% from all annual pass sales toward building funds that can be used exclusively for Capital Projects. Until FY 2019, these funds had not been released for use as the fund balance was needed to provide a fund balance offset against a fund deficit. As part of the FY22 budget proposal, the Golf Division implemented a Golf CIP Fee increase from $1 to $2 per every 9 holes played, beginning in January 2022, in order to bring more capital into the Golf CIP Fund to increase funding from this source for additional future projects. As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will be using $856,502 in FY 2022-23 to purchase additional equipment. The Golf Division has budgeted $4,050,000 for Capital Improvement Projects in FY 2022-23. The Golf Division is undertaking a four-year project to improve tee box hitting surfaces by re-leveling and re-sodding many of the tee box areas at each course and have allocated $60,000 in FY23 from the Golf CIP Fund. The Golf Division is undertaking a multi-year project to repair existing cart paths and construct some new carts paths and has allocated $950,000 for FY 2022-23. Other significant projects include new HVAC system at the Mountain Dell clubhouse, Roof improvements at the Nibley Park clubhouse, On-course restrooms at Nibley Park, Forest Dale and Glendale golf courses. The Golf Division is anticipating receiving a matching federal WaterSMART grant to assist in funding a new irrigation system at the Rose Park Golf Course. The award should be announced in May of 2022. If the grant is not awarded, approximately $2 million of CIP projects will be suspended in order to help fund the Rose Park irrigation system. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGETFiscal Year 2022-23 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS 81 The following table shows a breakdown of proposed projects: Facility Description Estimated Cost Bonneville Tee Box Leveling $10,000 Glendale Tee Box Construction $10,000 Forest Dale Tee Box Leveling $5,000 Mountain Dell Tee Box Leveling $20,000 Nibley Tee Box Leveling $5,000 Rose Park Tee Box Construction $10,000 Mountain Dell Basement HVAC Units/Water Heater $150,000 Bonneville Cart Path Improvements $250,000 Glendale Cart Path Improvements $150,000 Forest Dale Cart Path Improvements $150,000 Mountain Dell Cart Path Improvements $300,000 Nibley Cart Path Improvements $100,000 Forest Dale Clubhouse Painting $40,000 Glendale Irrigation Pump $20,000 Nibley Roof Improvements $30,000 Glendale On Course Restroom $150,000 Rose Park Short Course Design $50,000 Subtotal $1,450,000 Rose Park Irrigation System and Turf Reduction Project $2,075,000 Subtotal $2,075,000 Rose Park Rose Park Irrigation System Cost Overruns $525,000 Subtotal $525,000 Grand Total $4,050,000 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGETFiscal Year 2022-23 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS 82 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGETFiscal Year 2022-23 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS 83 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGETFiscal Year 2022-23 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS 84 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGETFiscal Year 2022-23 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS 85 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGETFiscal Year 2022-23 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS 86 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGETFiscal Year 2022-23 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS 87 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGETFiscal Year 2022-23 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS 88 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGETFiscal Year 2022-23 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS 89 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGETFiscal Year 2022-23 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS 90 The Salt Lake City Public Utilities Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) has four distinct utilities, water, sewer, storm water, and street lighting. Each utility is operated as a separate enterprise fund. Tax money is not used to fund these services. Funding for SLCDPU capital expenditures comes from user fees, fund reserves, revenue bonds, and occasionally a grant. The department is utilizing a Water Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan to finance a portion of the water reclamation facility construction. Customers pay for the services they receive through utility rates that have been established for each fund. The rates were developed on a cost of service basis. Our utilities are infrastructure intensive and administration of these assets requires long term project and financial planning. The SLCDPU capital budget is shown by fund with subcategory cost centers under each. In FY 2022-23, the department has over 150 capital projects between the four funds as well as continuing work on existing projects. Many of the capital projects in Public Utilities cover multiple fiscal years. It is common for projects designed in one year and be constructed in subsequent years. The budget includes projects rated as a high priority in the Department’s Capital Asset Program (CAP). The replacement of the water reclamation facility is the largest project undertaken by SLCDPU. Other elements of our systems are also experiencing aging problems and will require increasing attention in the future. For example, our three water treatment plants were built in the 1950’s and early 60’s. Planning is underway for each of the three plants to determine the best approaches for their replacement. A unique aspect of capital projects in SLCDPU is that Federal, State, and local regulations affect many of our priorities. Adding to the complexity are water rights and exchange agreement obligations. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 91 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 92 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 93 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 94 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 95 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 96 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 97 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 98 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 99 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 100 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 101 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 102 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 103 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 104 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 105 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 106 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 107 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 108 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS 109 This page has been intentionally left blank Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (RDA) strengthens neighborhoods and commercial districts to improve livability, create economic opportunity and foster authentic, equitable communities. The RDA utilizes a powerful set of financial and planning tools to support strategic development projects that enhance the City’s housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public spaces, and environmental sustainability. The RDA’s primary source of funds for the projects include property tax increment and program income revenue, depending on the specific budget account. The RDA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or construction of city owned infrastructure projects. As part of the RDA Budget Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that anticipates multi-year funding. The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval process and is typically contingent on the RDA Board authorizing appropriation once the specific projects costs and details are known. Depending on the project, the timeline for this process may not follow the City’s CIP schedule or requirements for approval. The RDA fiscal year 2023 budget process proposes three potential City infrastructure projects. The Japantown project is an allocation of funds to support implementation of the Design Strategy. Improvements could include infrastructure, utility work, lighting, site furniture, public art, etc. The Main Street project is an allocation of funds to support the transition of Main Street to a pedestrian-first promenade. Funds would primarily be used to hire a consultant to provide design/planning work, code analysis, phasing, and stakeholder engagement. The West Capitol Hill project provides additional funds to current projects which includes construction of Marmalade Plaza, a public open space and mid-block connection adjacent to the Marmalade Library. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 RDA CAPITAL PROJECTS 111 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 RDA CAPITAL PROJECTS 112 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 RDA CAPITAL PROJECTS 113 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-23 RDA CAPITAL PROJECTS 114 Division (Priority) / App Ref Organization Name / Application Title Requested Amount Votes Average Recommend Committee Score C31 400 S Safety Improvements 513,312.58 6 to 0 392,208.29 101.63 T1 200 South Reconstruction / Transit Corridor Supplement 4,500,000.00 6 to 0 3,041,666.67 94.67 C9 Three Creeks West – Roadways 1,359,130.00 4 to 1 575,000.00 92.13 T5 300 North Complete Street Reconstruction Supplement 600,000.00 6 to 0 454,166.67 91.44 C27 Rose Park Neighborhood Center Community Garden 160,819.00 5 to 0 116,491.40 90.88 C41 California Avenue Safety Improvement Study 100,000.00 5 to 0 70,000.00 90.50 C28 1000 W Fairpark Traffic Circle 569,534.00 5 to 0 401,720.40 90.00 E1 Street Improvements 2022/2023 3,500,000.00 6 to 0 2,145,833.33 89.22 C40 900 West Corridor 1,000,000.00 5 to 0 460,000.00 89.00 T7 2100 South Conceptual Design / Corridor Transformation 250,000.00 6 to 0 177,083.33 88 T3 Livable Streets Implementation 3,000,000.00 4 to 2 1,875,000.00 87.67 T2 Highland Drive / 1100 E Complete Street & Parley's Trail Supplement (1700 S ‐ I‐80)3,500,000.00 6 to 0 2,145,833.33 87.56 P19 Public Lands ADA Walkway and Asphalt Replacement 873,062.00 6 to 0 528,843.67 87.22 C20 Jordan River Peace Labyrinth Park Improvements 500,000.00 5 to 0 186,000.00 87.13 P18 Playground Replacement 1,874,063.00 6 to 0 1,274,687.67 86.89 C14 Madsen Park Renewal 500,000.00 5 to 0 240,000.00 86.50 P16 Asset Management Plan 160,160.00 6 to 0 106,720.00 85.22 P9 Folsom Trail Landscaping Phase I 1,767,908.00 6 to 0 4,167,287.33 85.00 C35 Liberty Wells Traffic Calming 420,000.00 4 to 1 205,000.00 84.50 T4 Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments 1,100,000.00 6 to 0 652,083.33 84.22 FA1 Facilities Asset Renewal Plan FY23 7,400,000.00 6 to 0 4,875,000.00 84.11 E4 Bridge Replacement (650 North over the Jordan River)3,700,000.00 6 to 0 3,083,333.33 84 E2 Public Way Concrete 2022/2023 750,000.00 6 to 0 447,916.67 83.56 P13 Cottonwood Park Pavilions 756,094.00 6 to 0 447,682.33 82.22 C30 400 North Street Improvement 599,746.29 4 to 1 499,873.00 81.50 P20 Court Resurfacing 1,478,739.00 5 to 1 655,747.80 81.44 T8 Ballpark Study Implementation ‐ Phase 1 500,000.00 4 to 2 475,000.00 81.33 T12 Local Streets 2023 Reconstruction Supplement 200,000.00 6 to 0 127,083.33 80.33 E3 Alleyway Improvements 2022/2023 250,000.00 6 to 0 182,291.67 80.22 C22 SLC Cemetery Infrastructure Repairs 500,000.00 4 to 1 400,000.00 80.13 C29 1000 W intersection upgrades at 300 N and 400 N 539,693.00 3 to 2 346,564.33 80.00 P1 Urban Farm Development at 2200 West and Cannon Greens 425,040.00 5 to 0 298,016.00 79.5 P3 Tree Succession Design for Liberty Park 90,160.00 5 to 0 72,096.00 79.38 E6 Bridge Preservation 2022/2023 300,000.00 5 to 1 207,000.00 79.22 P2 Jordan River Tree Planting and Irrigation 210,834.00 6 to 0 124,444.67 78.67 P7 Riverview Native Plant Center Phase I 412,160.00 5 to 0 327,296.00 77.38 C38 Sugar House Safe Side Streets Phase 2 400,000.00 5 to 0 240,000.00 76.86 P10 Cemetery Master Plan Project Implementation 2,231,443.00 6 to 0 1,138,573.83 76.78 T13 Replacement Traffic Signals (4)1,400,000.00 5 to 1 844,000.00 76.78 C6 Brentwood Circle Storm Water Drainage 139,129.00 4 to 1 104,346.75 76.38 T6 Multi‐modal Transportation Safety Improvements 300,000.00 6 to 0 195,833.33 76.33 2022‐23 Capital Improvement Program [Grand Totals Only (anonymous)] Attachment 4 - FY2023 CDCIP Board Project Scores and Votes Division (Priority) / App Ref Organization Name / Application Title Requested Amount Votes Average Recommend Committee Score 2022‐23 Capital Improvement Program [Grand Totals Only (anonymous)] C23 Taufer Park Revamp 50,000.00 5 to 0 40,000.00 76.25 P8 Library Plaza Repair and Improvements 205,755.00 6 to 0 162,170.00 76.22 P4 NW Quadrant Trails and Greenway Planning 257,600.00 5 to 1 194,560.00 75.89 T11 Replacement Traffic Signal; Asset Condition Report 450,000.00 5 to 1 360,000.00 75.89 T9 Future Transformations: Corridor and Area Studies 150,000.00 4 to 2 150,000.00 74.56 C17 Reopen Dinwoody Park as a Public Park 71,198.00 4 to 1 37,799.50 74.38 C19 Folsom Trail‐ Request on behalf of River District Business Alliance 500,000.00 3 to 2 500,000.00 74.00 E10 Bridge Replacement (200 South over the Jordan River) 3,500,000.00 4 to 2 3,500,000.00 73.22 P12 RAC Playground Phase II 521,564.00 6 to 0 419,115.33 73.11 E8 700 South (Phase 7 [Final Phase], 4600 West to 5000 West) 1,970,000.00 6 to 0 1,443,333.33 72.67 P14 Public Lands 5‐Year Strategic Plan 154,000.00 6 to 0 123,500.00 72.44 C10 900 South River Park Soccer Field 287,848.00 4 to 1 178,924.00 72.38 E9 Bridge Rehabilitation (400 South over the Jordan River) 1,700,000.00 5 to 1 1,700,000.00 72.13 C21 Replace Fairpark Tennis Courts with New Sports Court 496,109.00 3 to 2 398,703.00 71.88 P15 Jordan Park and International Peace Gardens Master Plan and CLR 251,160.00 5 to 1 160,232.00 70.56 C25 1200 East Median, Raise Curb, new irrigation, new tree planting 500,000.00 3 to 3 250,000.00 70 C36 Neighborhood Identification Equity Project 245,215.00 3 to 2 383,333.33 69.5 P6 Urban Wood Reutilization 206,080.00 4 to 1 154,540.00 69.38 F1 Mixed‐Use Three‐Story Fire Training Prop 856,689.61 5 to 1 17,595,130.00 68.44 P17 Memory Grove Master Plan and Cultural Landscape Report 341,320.00 6 to 0 210,220.00 68 C11 Gateway Triangle Property Park 499,563.00 4 to 1 337,390.75 67.88 T10 Multimodal Capital Maintenance 250,000.00 4 to 2 237,500.00 67.22 P5 Rose Park Open Space Concepts 154,560.00 4 to 1 115,920.00 66.38 C2 Back Alley Block Project 500,000.00 4 to 1 150,000.00 65.63 C13 Lindsey Gardens Natural Springs Pollinator Garden 500,000.00 2 to 3 400,000.00 65.38 E7 Rail Adjacent Pavement Improvements 2022/2023 70,000.00 3 to 3 66,666.67 65 C16 337 S 400 E Pocket Park Improvement 54,096.00 5 to 0 26,819.20 64.00 C15 Rose Park Community Pump Track 500,000.00 4 to 1 225,000.00 63.88 F2 Fire Training Ground Site Improvements 755,991.33 4 to 2 716,745.58 63.67 C34 Sunnyside Ave Pedestrian Safety Improvements 502,000.00 2 to 3 267,875.00 63.50 C37 Yalecrest Traffic Calming 240,000.00 2 to 3 170,000.00 61.13 C32 East Bench Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Safety 467,929.00 3 to 2 329,309.67 61.00 C12 Jefferson Park Walking Path 500,000.00 3 to 2 433,333.33 60.88 P11 Memorial Tree Groves Design and Infrastructure 867,962.00 6 to 0 427,993.67 60.78 E5 Project Management Software Renewal 79,000.00 5 to 1 79,000.00 60.56 E11 Wingpointe Levee Design 800,000.00 3 to 3 800,000.00 59 FA2 Streets Steam Bay Expansion 597,792.00 4 to 1 597,792.00 57.75 C24 Welcome Signage 500,000.00 3 to 2 91,666.67 57.38 C26 Mountain Dell Disc Golf Course 500,000.00 3 to 2 216,666.67 56.63 C33 Sugar House Crosswalk Murals 50,000.00 2 to 3 50,000.00 56.13 C18 First Encampment Park 363,916.00 2 to 3 75,000.00 53.25 Division (Priority) / App Ref Organization Name / Application Title Requested Amount Votes Average Recommend Committee Score 2022‐23 Capital Improvement Program [Grand Totals Only (anonymous)] C1 1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk 237,182.00 2 to 3 218,591.00 53.00 C4 South Belaire Dr road reconstruction 699,650.00 2 to 3 350,000.00 50.50 C8 Repair Alley #4195 after 9th South rebuild project 86,000.00 2 to 3 86,000.00 48 C3 Pave Benchmark Circle 75,000.00 2 to 3 75,000.00 43.50 C7 Harvey Milk Blvd. Rainbow Crosswalk 300,000.00 2 to 3 50,000.00 42.50 C5 Storm drains 1100 east south of Zenith ave 92,735.00 2 to 3 92,367.50 41.00 71,788,941.81 68,955,922.66 Names of Projects Departments Sales Tax Bond GO Bond General Fund GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX ARPA Sales Tax Bonds City Cemetery Road Repairs / Reconstruction Public Lands $11,200,000 Pioneer Park Improvements Public Lands $10,000,000 Eligible 600 North Corridor Transformation Transporation $9,753,000 10% Eligible Radio Towers IMS $7,500,000 Central Plant Electrical Transformer Upgrade & Emergency Backup Generators Public Services $6,100,000 Westside Railroad Quiet Zones Public Services $6,100,000 Warm Spring Historic Plunge Structure Stabilization Public Services $6,000,000 Smith's Ballpark Improvements Public Services $3,000,000 Urban Wood Reutilization Equipment and Storage Additions Public Lands $2,000,000 Fisher Mansion Stabilization Public Services $1,800,000 GO Bond (to be considered by voters - would not impact FY 23 property taxes) Glendale Regional Park Public Lands $27,000,000 100% Eligible Eligible Jordan River Corridor Improvements Public Lands $9,000,000 Partially Eligible Allen Park Public Lands $9,000,000 100% Eligible Seven Neighborhood Parks, 1 per district Public Lands $7,000,000 $3 million Eligible Fleet Block Park Public Lands $5,000,000 100% Eligible Eligible Liberty Park Playground Public Lands $2,000,000 Folsom Trail Completion Public Lands $5,000,000 100% Eligible 20% contingency Public Lands $16,000,000 400 South Safety Improvements Transporation $513,313 200 South Reconstruction / Transit Corridor Supplement Transporation $2,700,242 $2,643 $252,000 $1,300,000 Three Creeks West Roadways Public Lands & Public Utilities $1,359,130 300 North Complete Street Reconstruction Supplement Transporation $500,000 $40,000 Rose Park Neighborhood Center Community Garden Public Lands $160,819 Eligible Street Improvements 2022/2023 Public Services $3,000,000 Public Lands Asset Management Plan Public Lands $160,160 Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments Transporation $990,000 $110,000 Facilities Asset Renewal Plan FY23 Public Services $1,192,357 Bridge Replacement (650 North over Jordan River)Public Services $3,700,000 Public Way Concrete 2022/2023 Public Services $436,281 Alleyway Improvements 2022/2023 Engineering $142,919 Urban Farm Development at 2200 West Public Lands $425,040 Eligible RAC Playground Phase II Public Lands $521,564 700 South (Phase 7, 4600 W to 5000 W)Engineering $850,000 $1,120,000 900 South River Park Soccer Field Public Lands $287,848 Memorial Tree Groves Design and Infrastructure Public Lands $867,962 Streets Steam Bay Expansion Public Services $597,792 Restoration of CCB Reimburse by Insurance Public Services $2,000,000 Hand Held Radios IMS $3,700,000 Complete Streets Transporation $3,700,000 Parks Maintenance Public Lands $2,000,000 Maintenance of Vacant City Owned Facilities Public Services $700,000 Totals $63,453,000 $80,000,000 $13,234,877 $5,035,000 $3,000,000 $3,360,193 $8,700,000 $0 Total Bonds $143,453,000 Total CIP $33,330,070 Total Investment (Bonds & CIP)$176,783,070 CIP New/Maintenance Projects Recommended for Funding Attachment 5 - FY2023 Capital Investments Summary Sheet (GO Bond, Sales Tax Bond and CIP) Last Updated June 10, 2022 Names of Projects Departments Sales Tax Bond GO Bond General Fund GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX ARPA California Avenue Safety Improvement Study Transportation 100,000$ 1000 W Fairpark Traffic Circle Transportation 569,534$ 900 West Corridor Transportation & Public Utilities 1,000,000$ 2100 South Conceptual Design / Corridor Transformation Transportation 250,000$ Livable Streets Implementation Transportation 2,700,000$ 300,000$ Highland Drive / 1100 E Complete Street & Parley's Trail Supplement (1700 S-I-80)Transportation 245,000$ 3,255,000$ Public Lands ADA Walkway and Asphalt Replacement Public Lands 873,062$ Jordan River Peace Labyrinth Park Improvements Public Lands 500,000$ Eligible Playground Replacement Public Lands 1,874,063$ Madsen Park Renewal Public Lands 500,000$ Folsom Trail Landscaping Phase I Public Lands 1,767,908$ Liberty Wells Traffic Calming Transportation 420,000$ Cottonwood Park Pavilions Public Lands 756,094$ 400 North Street Improvement Transportation 599,746$ Court Resurfacing Public Lands 1,478,739$ Ballpark Study Implementation - Phase 1 Transportation 450,000$ 50,000$ Local Streets 2023 Reconstruction Supplement Transportation 200,000$ SLC Cemetery Infrastructure Repairs Public Lands 500,000$ 1000 W intersection upgrades at 300 N and 400 N Transportation 539,693$ Tree Succession Design for Liberty Park Public Lands 90,160$ Jordan River Tree Planting and Irrigation Public Lands 210,834$ Riverview Native Plant Center Phase 1A Public Lands 412,160$ Sugar House Safe Side Streets Part 2 Transportation 400,000$ Replacement Traffic Signals (4)Transportation 1,260,000$ 140,000$ Brentwood Circle Storm Water Drainage Public Utilities 160,129$ Partially Eligible Multi-modal Transportation Safety Improvements Transportation 270,000$ 30,000$ Taufer Park Revamp Public Lands 50,000$ Library Plaza Repair and Improvements Public Lands 205,755$ Replacement Traffic Signal; Asset Condition Report Transportation 415,000$ 35,000$ NW Quadrant trails and Greenway Planning Public Lands 257,600$ Future Transformations: Corridor and Area Studies Transportation 150,000$ Reopen Dinwoody Park as a Public Park Public Lands 71,198$ Folsom Trail- Request on behalf of River District Business Alliance Transportation 500,000$ Bridge Replacement (200 South over Jordan River) Public Services 3,500,000$ Public Lands 5-Year Strategic Plan Public Lands 154,000$ Bridge Rehabilitation (400 South over the Jordan River) Public Services 1,700,000$ Replace Fairpark Tennis Courts with New Sports Court Public Lands 496,109$ Jordan Park and International Peace Gardens Master Plan and CLR Public Lands 251,160$ 1200 East Median, Raise Curb, new irrigation, new tree planting Public Lands 500,000$ Neighborhood Identification Equity Project Transportation 245,215$ Urban Wood Reutilization Public Lands 206,080$ Mixed-Use Three-Story Fire Prop Fire 856,690$ Memory Grove Master Plan and Cultural Landscape Report Public Lands 341,320$ Gateway Triangle Property Park Public Lands 499,563$ Multimodal Capital Maintenance Transportation 225,000$ 25,000$ CIP Projects NOT Recommeded for Funding (in order of CDCIP Board Scores) Attachment 5 - FY2023 Capital Investments Summary Sheet (GO Bond, Sales Tax Bond and CIP) Last Updated June 10, 2022 Names of Projects Departments Sales Tax Bond GO Bond General Fund GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX ARPA Rose Park Open Space Concepts Public Lands 154,560$ Back Alley Block Project Public Services 517,500$ Lindsey Gardens Natural Springs Pollinator Garden Public Lands 500,000$ Rail Adjacent Pavement Improvements 2022/2023 Public Services 70,000$ 337 S 400 E Pocket Park Improvement Public Lands 54,096$ Rose Park Community Pump Track Public Lands 498,584$ Training Ground Site Improvements Fire 755,991$ Sunnyside Ave Pedestrian Safety Improvements Transportation 514,688$ Yalecrest Traffic Calming Transportation 240,000$ East Bench Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Safety Transportation 467,929$ Jefferson Park Walking Path Public Lands 496,472$ Project Management Software Renewal Public Services 79,999$ Wingpointe Levee Design Public Services 800,000$ Welcome Signage Transportation 500,000$ Mountain Dell Disc Golf Course Public Lands 500,000$ Sugar House Crosswalk Murals Transportation 50,000$ First Encampment Park Public Lands 363,916$ 1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk Public Services & Public Utilities 275,919$ South Belaire Dr Road Reconstruction Public Services 699,650$ Repair Alley #4195 after 9th South rebuild project Public Services 72,450$ Pave Benchmark Circle Public Services 199,307$ Harvey Milk Blvd. Rainbow Crosswalk Transportation 459,346$ Storm Drains 1100 East South of Zenith Ave Public Utilities 92,735$ Notes: The Public Services Department includes the Facilities Division (city owned buildings) and the Engineering Division (street and alley projects) The GF FOF column includes funding proposed for parks maintenance and an amount "off the top" available to any capital project The Impact Fees column includes transportation impact fees and parks impact fees Attachment 5 - FY2023 Capital Investments Summary Sheet (GO Bond, Sales Tax Bond and CIP) Last Updated June 10, 2022 2 1 0 8 1 ATTACHMENT 6 – Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Council Requests from January 2019 1.Policy Goals and Metrics – Council Members requested high-level cost estimates for the City to implement the below policy goals as well as any metrics. The Administration was invited to recommend policy goals to the Council. Three cost estimates are included based on prior discussions but may not represent the best currently available information. The table is intended for discussion purposes and does not represent a comprehensive list of policy goals for Council consideration. Potential Policy Goals Potential Metrics High-level Cost Estimate Bring all facilities out of deferred maintenance Appropriations vs. funding need identified in Public Services’ Facilities Dashboard that tracks each asset $6.8 million annually or $68 million over ten years Expand the City's urban trail network with an emphasis on East-West connections Total paved/unpaved network miles; number and funding for improved trail features; percentage of 9-Line completed $21 million for 9- Line implementation Increase the overall condition index of the City's street network from poor to fair Overall Condition Index (OCI); pavement condition survey every five years $133 million cost estimate (in addition to existing funding level) Implement the Foothill Trails Master Plan Distance of improved trails completed; number and funding for improved trailheads $TBD Advance the City's sustainability goals through building energy efficiency upgrades Energy savings; carbon emission reductions $TBD Focus on renewal and maintenance projects over creating new assets Number, funding level and ratio of renewed assets vs. new assets $TBD 2.Project Location Mapping – Council Members requested a map of all CFP projects. The idea of multiple maps based on dollar value was discussed such as $50,000 - $999,999, $1 million - $5 million, and over $5 million. 3.Measure CFP to CIP Alignment – Council Members expressed support for annually measuring the alignment of how many CIP Funding Log projects were previously listed in the CFP and how many CIP projects receiving appropriations were previously listed in the CFP. A high alignment would indicate the CFP is successfully identifying the City’s capital needs. 4.Council Adoption of CFP – The question arose if the Council should adopt the CFP each year with the annual budget or potentially in the summer when reviewing project specific funding. Does the Administration have a preference? Parks 2019 Estimate 2021 Estimate Trailside Pit Toilet $150,000 $168,000 Portland Loo (each) Existing Sewer Line $200,000 $224,000 4 Seat Each Gender. Existing Sewer Line $350,000 $450,000 8 Seat Each Gender. Existing Sewer Line $550K - $600K $700,000 Site Master Plan $50K - $75K $75,000-$100,000 Cultural Landscape Report $75,000-$150,000 City-wide Comprehensive Study $150K - $250K $200,000-$300-000 Installed with sewer connection $15K - $30,000 $35000- $50,000 Playground Replacement $150K - $250K $450,000-$550,000 Native soil field $150,000 $400,000-$500,000 Sand-based field $400,000 $1,000,000 Softball/Baseball Field Improvements (Each Field)$200,000 $250,000 Fencing (6 ft. vinyl coated chain link)$45.00-$55.00/LF Patch, repair and paint $150,000 $168,000 New post tension court $250,000 $300,000 Hand-built natural surface single track trail (40" width)$6-12/LF $25.00-$30.00/LF Machine-built natural-surface trail (40" width)$20-25/LF $10.00-$15.00/LF Asphalt Trail $3.50/SF $5.00/SF Concrete Trail (6" thick)$4.50/SF $8.00/SF Soft Surface - Crushed stone $2.50/SF $6.00-$10.00/ SF Off-leash Dog Parks $250K - $350K $ 280,000-$392,000 Irrigation Systems Per Acre $52,000+$75,000 + Tree Replacements (Each 2-inch caliper)$350 $750 Natural Area Restoration Per Acre $100K - $200K $ 112,000- $224,000 Transportation 2019 Estimate 2021 Estimate Bike - One Mile Cycle Track/Lane Mile (3 lane miles = 1.5 actual miles)500,000+$600,000+ Bike - One Lane Mile (2 lane miles = 1 mile actual mile) 2,000+$2,500+ Bike - Protected Lane Mile (200 West 2015)$400,000 $500,000-1,000,000 Traffic Signals - New 250,000$ 350,000.00$ Traffic Signals - Upgrades 250,000$ 350,000.00$ HAWK Signals 130,000$ 150,000.00$ Crosswalk - Flashing 60,000$ $75,000 Crosswalk - School Crossing Lights 25,000$ $30,000 Crosswalk - Colored/Stamped varies based on width of road $15K - $25K $18,000-$27,000 Driver Feedback Sign 8,000$ $9,500 Speed Table / Raised Crosswalk 25,000$ $30,000 Pedestrian Refuge Island 10,000$ $12,000 Curb Extension at Intersection 20,000$ $25,000 Crosswalk 1,600$ $1,800 Streets 2019 Estimate 2021 Estimate Asphalt Overlay (Lane Mile)280,000$ 335,000$ Crack Seal (Lane Mile)5,000$ 6,000$ Road Reconstruction - Asphalt (Lane Mile)500,000$ 600,000$ Road Reconstruction - Asphalt to Concrete (Lane Mile)$700k - $1.2 M $840,000 - $1,440,000 Sidewalk slab jacking (per square foot)4$ $5 Sidewalk replacement (per square foot)$ 7 - $10 $8 - $12 Note: Last updated July 2021 Studies Restrooms (dependent on site and utility work) Regular CIP Project Costs General Rules of Thumb NOTE: Costs are estimates based on most recent information available (which may be out of date), vary by project, and do not include on-going maintenance. Drinking Fountains Multi-purpose Field Improvements Tennis Court Improvements (2 Courts) Path/ Trail Improvements Attachment 7 Funding Source Cost Center Description Remaining Appropriation Complete?If Not Complete, Status? 8317359 Gladiola to Indiana 900S Seq C 112,658$ 8317361 Street Reconstruction Improv 49$ 8314031 Driver Feedback Signs 86,320$ 8317032 Bridge Maintenance Program 18,573$ 8317036 Street Improvements: Reconstru 14,522$ 8318023 Gladiola 900 S Imp 38,047$ 8318154 1300 E Class C 442,501$ 8319502 Street Overlay 19 287$ 8315015 Fire Station #14 furnishings 158$ 8315027 Bikeway - Close the gap 25,336$ 8316027 Bikeways, Citywide 60$ 8316046 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 103,182$ 8316070 Warm Springs Park, 840 N 300 W 13,195$ 8317017 Recreation/Open Space GO Bond 45,978$ 8317025 500/700 S Reconstruction 408,037$ 8317029 Bus Stop Enhancements 16,990$ 8317043 Parks and Public Lands Compreh 9,661$ 8317049 UTA TIGER GRANT MATCH 21,634$ 8317055 Capital Facilities Plan 4,928$ 8318027 Public Way Concrete Restoratio 7,733$ 8318028 Bridge Maintenance 76,504$ 8318045 Bikeways Urban Trails 90,035$ 8318047 Rose Park Pedestrian Byway 237,581$ 8318048 Miller Park ADA access 367,835$ 8318049 Jordan R. Flood Control 5,908$ 8318053 Parks and Rec HVAC 9,900$ 8318084 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT - CIP 110,104$ 8319406 11th Ave Pavilion and Signage 33,596$ 8319401 Glendale Park Playground Path 43,476$ 8619405 Sugarhouse Pavilion Con to CO 112,000$ 8319701 Library Parking Equipment 170,689$ 8319621 Traffic Signals Upgrade 1$ 8319407 Imperial Park Shade Structure (1,400)$ Why is this negative? 8319622 1400 E Sunnyside Intersection 64,663$ 8619603 Saw Cutting Sidewalk 1,216$ 8619604 Proactive Sidewalk 984$ 8619402 City-wide Park Walkway Safety 5,386$ 8619411 Westside Trail Connections 249,923$ 8619624 1700 S Lane Reconfiguration 35,322$ 8619408 Lindsay Garden Concession 53,692$ 8619409 Fairmont Stream Access Beautif 102,949$ Class C General Fund 8619702 C & C Square Master Plan 223$ 8319619 1900 East Reconsruction 68,503$ 8319616 Whitlock Curb and Gutter 18,910$ 8319403 RAC Shade Structure and Playgr 35,575$ 8319405 Rose Park Multiloop Trail 148,007$ 8319301 Delong & Parks Yard Improvemen 19,931$ 8319721 Millcreek Sugarhouse GF 486$ 8319741 WestsideMultimodal GF 29,658$ 8319751 Life on State CIP 82,945$ 8319900 Transportation Acctg SalesTax 1,130$ 8412002 Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 124,593$ 8413001 Study for Fire House #3 15,700$ 8415002 Fire Station #3 1,568$ 8416004 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 42,833$ 8416005 9line park 18,411$ 8416006 Fire Station #14 44,612$ 8416009 Fire Station #3 469$ 8417007 Transportation Safety Improvem 1,444$ 8418002 Cwide Dog Lease Imp 530$ 8418003 Bikeway Urban Trails 187,516$ 8418005 Bridge to Backman 275,475$ 8406001 Gladiola Street 2,244$ 8418013 Police Refunds 3,588$ 4,264,564$ Impact Fees TOTAL of ALL SOURCES ERIN MENDENHALL MAYOR BEN KOLENDAR DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL _______________________ Date Received: 5/11/2022 Lisa Schaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 5/11/2022 __________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: May 11, 2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Benjamin Kolendar, Director, Department of Economic Development SUBJECT: New Ordinance Requirements for Art Maintenance Reporting STAFF CONTACTS: Felicia Baca, felicia.baca@slcgov.com, 385-256-5588 Renato Olmedo-Gonzaléz, Renato.olmedo-gonzalez@slcgov.com, 801-824-9122 DOCUMENT TYPE: Informational RECOMMENDATION: n/a BUDGET IMPACT: Portion of existing CIP budget already designated, no additional impact. COORDINTATION: n/a ORDINANCE CONSIDERATIONS: “2.30.060: FUNDS FOR WORKS OF ART; REQUESTS FOR APPROPRIATIONS: A.WHEN SO DESIGNATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, IN ITS APPROPRIATION FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS SHALL EXPEND, AS A NONDEDUCTIBLE ITEM OUT OF ANY MONIES APPROPRIATED FOR THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO ONE AND ONE-HALF PERCENT (1.5%) OF SUCH APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF WORKS OF ART AND ORNAMENTATION, TEN TO TWENTY PERCENT (10-20%) OF WHICH WILL BE DEPOSITED IN THE PUBLIC ART MAINTENANCE FUND AND USED TO PROVIDE MAINTENANCE FOR EXISTING WORKS OF ART. THE MAYOR SHALL PROVIDE A REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL OF WORKS OF ART THAT REQUIRE MAINTENANCE AND THE ESTIMATED COST OF SUCH MAINTENANCE PRIOR TO THE FUNDS BEING DEPOSITED IN THE PUBLIC ART MAINTENANCE FUND. BACKGROUND: The public art program recommends to the Finance Department that 20% of CIP funds are deposited in FY23 to the maintenance fund based on the following report. This report was also sent to Mary Beth Thompson for the maintenance allocation. Lisa Shaffer (May 11, 2022 15:36 MDT) We additionally have included a report on FY22 Completed/In-Progress Artwork Maintenance Projects. In the last three years, Salt Lake City has implemented important and necessary revisions to the Salt Lake City Arts Council’s Public Art Program. The incredible support and meaningful funding provided by the Mayor and City Council established the foundations of a comprehensive maintenance plan, which effectively secures the future safeguarding and stewardship City’s art assets. Since its establishment in 1984, the Salt Lake City Arts Council’s Public Art Program has lacked the proper structural and policy procedures, including a source of adequate funding, necessary for the proper care and upkeep of its rich and vast public art collection. These important revisions to the Public Art Program can be summarized in the following: • A significant, one-time allocation of approximately ~$200,000 in FY20 by City Council for the Public Art Program to identify its maintenance needs and fully understand the status of its permanent public art collection. Through this funding, the Public Art Program contracted Dodworth & Stauffer Art Appraisal and Consulting and commissioned a Condition & Inventory Assessment Report that surveyed 150 public artworks located in City-owned parks, streets, plazas, and buildings, as well as 92 artworks located at the City & County Building. Each artwork was assigned a Priority Code Ranking from 1 to 4 with notes on each item’s installation and condition with recommended actions for maintenance and repair. The criteria for each of the priority codes are as follows: [1] Immediate action: structural issues, visually unsightly; [2] Moderate action: peeling paint, early corrosion, etc.; [3] Cleaning / waxing; and [4] Condition acceptable. This Condition & Inventory Assessment is the guiding document for conducting artwork repairs; • In early 2021, City Council amended Ordinance 2.30, which established the City’s Public Art Program in 1984. This amendment established a permanent maintenance and provided a structure for annual funding, which is determined by the Council-approved Capital Improvement Program (10-20% of the total monies given to the program through the 1.5%/Percent-for-Art annual allocation). Furthermore, this amendment enabled the Public Art Program to adopt a deaccession policy (removal of an artwork from the permanent collection). A deaccession policy was officially adopted by the Salt Lake Art Design Board in December 2021. FY22 COMPLETED & IN-PROGRESS ARTWORK MAINTENANCE PROJECTS: During FY22, the Public Art Program conducted a variety of maintenance needs to eight public artworks in its permanent collection for a total cost of $176,067.047 (Attachment A). Through the annual Percent-for-Art funding approved in early 2021, the Public Art Program allocated $20,266 towards the maintenance fund (15% of the total amount funded for public art by City Council). Our program’s FY22 maintenance efforts, which ranged greatly in scope, duration, and total cost, established the foundations of our program’s maintenance strategy. In FY22 we addressed a combination of Priority 1 artworks (a stolen artwork that was addressed for repaired had been identified as Priority 2 prior to the theft) and other unexpected repairs (UR) due to immediate damage or theft. In total, 4 artworks within the Priority 1 Category were addressed. Two other artworks maintained during FY22 were repaired using funds not in our established maintenance fund (e.g., monies from insurance settlements, etc.). The Public Art Program works closely with the City’s Risk Manager in these cases to determine and secure these funding sources. Another artwork, Fire House Fire, was considered by the Art Design Board for deaccession, but this body ultimately voted in favor of refabricating it. These maintenance efforts conducted in FY22 have provided our program with an outlook that illustrates the various needs and obstacles our program will face as it continues to address the maintenance needs of the rest of our permanent collection. Each artwork maintenance project is different, with some requiring more staff time and funding than others. FY23 MAINTENANCE PROJECTIONS: For FY23, the Public Art Program intends to address the maintenance needs of 21 artworks in its permanent collection, for a projected total cost of $110,825 (the entirety of this funding will come from the Public Art Maintenance Fund). A contingency of $15,000 has been included in this total, in order to plan for future unexpected repairs (Attachment B). After City Council approves the FY23 CIP budget, the Percent-for-Art allocation will be issued to the Arts Council for its Public Art Program. We recommend that 20% of this total will be directed towards the Maintenance Fund. This amount, which will not become known until later this year, has not been included in these projections. Our program aims to use these promised maintenance funds towards any potential deaccession costs (artwork removal) and/or further addressing the needs of the remaining Priority 2 artworks. Our FY23 maintenance workplan and projections will address the needs of all the remaining artworks identified in the Priority 1 category (11 artworks in total) and a significant portion of the Priority 2 artworks (10 out of 37 artworks). Most of our current available funding will be devoted to the artworks in the first category. In total, there are 93 maintenance recommendations identified by the Condition & Inventory Assessment Report (not including replacement of didactic plaques for 36 artworks). Our FY23 maintenance projections, in addition to our FY22 efforts already conducted, will effectively address 22% of these recommendations. We have the ability of addressing a large quantity of these repairs because they will be done by a single contractor. Lastly, up to four different artworks will be considered or have been recommended for deaccession from our permanent collection. KEY CONSIDERATIONS: The findings of the Condition & Assessment Report and the establishment of an adequate maintenance plan have been a significant milestone achieved by our program. During FY22, the Public Art Program made great strides at implementing a maintenance strategy that is responsive to the needs of our public art collection—an invaluable City cultural asset—and adequately considers our staff capacity to handle these. Each artwork requires its own unique strategy for proper maintenance, impacting the number of repairs that can be conducted at any given point. Additionally, the cost, project scope, and availability of materials needed for repairs are variables that continuously impact our ability to make progress on our immediate and future maintenance plans. The FY23 Maintenance Projections will nearly deplete our current maintenance fund (see Attachment B). Although there is now a mechanism in place to guarantee a 10-20% allocation of Percent-for-Art funding for our program’s maintenance needs, additional funds will be necessary to address the remaining artworks identified as priorities within our public art collection in future years In addition to the maintenance accomplishments and objectives described throughout this document, the Public Art Program will focus a great deal of its FY23 efforts towards fulfilling Mayor Mendenhall’s 2022 goal of address gaps in public arts projects. A number of public artworks currently located in multiple City-owned facilities pre-date the establishment of the Public Art Program in Salt Lake City (e.g., Gilgal Sculpture Garden, International Peace Gardens, etc.) or have been created outside the Percent-for- Art funding structure (RDA funding, for example). Our program will aim to address proper stewardship and care for these important City art assets through a formal acquisition process that also ensures their future care and safeguarding. Overall, the remaining number of unmaintained artworks, and finite funding remain the biggest obstacles impacting our future maintenance efforts. Thanks to the generous support, trust, and funding received from the Mayor and City Council, our Public Art Program developed a comprehensive maintenance strategy that began to address gaps within our public art collection. The full maintenance condition & inventory assessment can be found here. Attachments: Attachment A: FY2022 Completed and in-progress artwork maintenance projects Attachment B: FY2023 Artwork maintenance projections ATTACHMENT A: FY22 Completed & In-Progress Artwork Maintenance Projects 5 FY22 Artwork Maintenance Projects Priority Artist Artwork title District Notes Funding Source Actual cost 1 Doug Soelberg Deadly Virtues 4 Repairs to be completed in March 2022. Artwork damaged during May 2020 protests demanding racial justice. Maintenance Fund $20,354.00 1 Ric Blackberry Bird in a Plane 4 Completed fall 2021. Object recovered from storage, repaired, and reinstalled. Maintenance Fund $ 2,500.00 1 Various Untitled (Labyrinth) 2 Completed summer 2021. Various repairs conducted. Maintenance Fund $ 6,250.00 1 Ben Jones and Cary Stevens Jones Fire House Fire 6 Refabrication of object will be completed in the coming months. This artwork was considered for deaccession by Art Design Board and was ultimately chosen to be refabricated. Maintenance Fund $ 37,656.47 UR* Traci O'Very Covey Imagine 4 Completed in fall 2021. Bottom of vinyl mural reprinted and replaced Maintenance Fund $ 620.00 UR* Dan Gerhart Bonneville Reliquary II 7 Reinstallation of object in March 2022. Object damaged in traffic accident (hit-and-run) in fall 2021. Maintenance Fund $ 10,187.00 UR*/2 Jim Jacobs and Silvia Davis Crystal Grate 4 Reinstallation of object in August 2022.Refabrication of 6 bronze cast tree grates. Stolen in summer 2021 from Gallivan Center. Refabrication cost to be paid for a settlement, with remaining funds provided by the RDA. Insurance settlement; RDA $ 55,300.00 6 Priority Artist Artwork title District Notes Funding Source Actual cost UR* Ed Fraughton Finding the Way (Parley P. Pratt monument) 7 Reinstallation of object in March 2022. Maintenance included extensive repairs to sculpture and reinstallation of masonry base. Artwork damaged in a traffic accident (hit by a semitruck). Refabrication cost to be paid for through a settlement with insurance company, with remaining funds provided by the RDA. Insurance settlement / reimbursement $43,200.00 *UR - Unexpected repair FY22 EXPENSES PAID FROM MAINTENANCE FUND $ 77,567.47 TOTAL EXPENSES FOR FY22 PUBLIC ART MAINTENANCE $176,067.47 ATTACHMENT B: FY23 Artwork Maintenance Projections 7 FY23 Artwork Maintenance Projections Priority Artist Artwork title District Notes Cost Estimate 1 John Swain Untitled 4 Clean, strip, and repaint $ 2,550.00 1 Kinde Nebeker Untitled 3 Cast 14 bronze plaques @ $1,985.00 each $ 27,790.00 1 Various Garden Silhouettes 4 Refabricate and replace missing silhouettes $ 7,560.00 1 Robert Ellison Tweak 360 2 Clean and repaint sculpture $ 6,625.00 1 Dave Eddy Red Fans 4 Remove, repaint, and reinstall $ 4,480.00 1 John Hess Eurythmy 5 Relocate to a new, City-owned facility $ - 1 Day Christensen, Landmark Design 500 West Park Blocks 4 Various repairs to infrastructure; site improvements $ 9,000.00 1 Wayne Chubin Friends of the Park 5 Recommended deaccession $ - 1 Thomas Tessman Pierpont Benches 4 Recommended deaccession $ - 1 Eric Thelander Sugar House Benches 7 Recommended deaccession $ - 1 Various Untitled at Bend in the River 2 Further assessment needed (potential deaccession) $ - 2 Day Christensen Trees (Maple) 5 Address rust issues and determine further deterioration $ 2,470.00 2 Holly Christmas Flight of Fancy 4 Repair top and reinstall $ 3,565.00 2 Greg Ragland Three Peas in a Pod 2 Repair ends of three peas elements $ 2,615.00 2 Cordell Taylor Order to Chaos 4 Repair or replace corroded areas & repaint $ 4,575.00 2 Sam Allen Untitled 4 Clean and repaint sculpture $ 1,545.00 2 Ethan Barley Anthocyanin 4 Repaint both sculptures to prevent additional loss $ 1,800.00 2 Lena Konopasek McClelland Trail: Spurt 5 Remove graffiti and repaint $ 2,775.00 8 Priority Artist Artwork title District Notes Cost Estimate 2 Unknown Herman Franks 5 Sculpt, mold, and replace missing bronze bat $ 5,975.00 2 Wayne Chubin, Tim Gallagher Signal Site 1 Various repairs to infrastructure $ 4,500.00 2 Ed Dolinger Untitled 4 Repaint 24 objects $ 8,000.00 Contingency for unexpected repairs $ 15,000.00 TOTAL EXPENSES FOR FUTURE PUBLIC ART MAINTENANCE* *All monies to come from Maintenance Fund $ 110,825.00 Funds available in Maintenance Cost Center $ 111,762.95 Anticipated balance (not including FY23 allocation) $ 937.95 Type FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 Constituent 10 13 19 14 0 24 41 Departmental 67 37 35 40 19 50 49 Totals 77 50 54 54 19 74 90 10 13 19 14 0 24 41 67 37 35 40 19 50 49 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Total Project Requests by Fiscal Year (FY) Constituent Departmental Attachment 10 - Comparison of CIP Project Requests by Year and Type Bond Projects Summary Document General Obligation (GO) Bond Overview The GO Bond funds will provide Salt Lake City with the opportunity to build on our existing investments to expand and enhance our public lands system in line with the goals of the Reimagine Nature Master Plan and the Mayor’s 2022 Plan. The following projects were selected for funding based on these priorities: 1. Alignment with the Transformative Projects identified in the Reimagine Nature Master Plan and the Mayor’s 2022 Plan 2. Geographic distribution and equity in level of service across the city 3. Community identified priorities through preliminary polling in improving quality of life, specifically air quality, water quality, and access to open space Using these priorities, the following seven projects have been identified for funding in the GO Bond. These projects are listed below in order of Public Lands staff prioritization: 1. Glendale Regional Park 2. Jordan River Corridor Improvements and Activation 3. Allen Park Revitalization and Access 4. Reimagine Neighborhood Parks 5. Fleet Block New Park 6. Liberty Park Playground 7. Folsom Trail Completion and Landscaping All projects listed will require significant public engagement before deciding what work and amenities will be completed. These projects build off existing and planned work by the city. Glendale Regional Park Ask: $27 million Description: The Glendale Regional Park project takes place on the Glendale Water Park site on 1700 S. The site is currently in a master planning process to develop the plan for the final park development. Funding from the bond would substantially build out the vision proposed in the Master Plan. Outcomes: The project is currently funded for Phase One which will complete an active recreation element by spring of 2024, including an all ages playground with accessible design and assistive technologies. The bond funding would substantially complete the build out of the site. The public engagement for the project has informed the design and amenities of highest interest include hiking/biking trails, playgrounds that support play at all levels of ability, water features, a skatepark, food truck infrastructure, basketball and pickleball courts, riverside recreation and access and community gathering space. This project will improve the connectivity and cohesion of the green space in the area, including 17th South Park, Glendale Neighborhood Park, and the Jordan River. Justification: This project is specifically called out in the Master Plan, and it is also supported by the master plan goal to Revive Our River. This project will improve safety and accessibility on the site while also improving air and water quality through increased vegetation. This project is also critical for ensuring that Salt Lake City can continue to provide accessible green spaces as we continue to grow. The 2019 Public Lands Needs assessment called for an additional 94 acres of green space to accommodate expected growth at the current level of service. Current process: Public Lands is currently finalizing the Master Plan document for the site. It is projected for completion and adoption in Fall 2022. Jordan River Corridor Improvements and Activation Ask: $9 million Description: The Jordan River is a key asset in the valley that touches a diversity of communities and provides unique opportunities to recreate. This project will enhance the trail as well as adjacent park spaces. In addition, the Jordan River lands are adjacent to many underserved communities and investment in high quality maintenance and recreation infrastructure can help bring more equitable service to Westside neighborhoods. Outcomes: This project will improve local water and air quality by installing irrigation systems for trees along the Jordan River trail at five key locations. Stormwater outfall and green infrastructure improvements will also be incorporated. This project will also implement improvements to develop consistent and welcoming park spaces along the Jordan River corridor that foster community gathering and highlight the Jordan River as a desirable recreation destination. Specific projects include, nature play areas, pollinator gardens, public art, paddle share program, bike pumptrack and enhanced natural areas at open spaces along the river. All park improvements will include the addition of multilingual signage. Justification: This project is supported by the Master Plan goal Revive Our River and will focus on the strategies listed in the Plan. This project will improve local water and air quality by enhancing the tree canopy and plant biodiversity along the river, while also installing water-wise irrigation systems. Additions of new amenities along the river will improve our distribution of services and accessibility of the river. Current Process: This project builds on the strategies listed in the Master Plan. This work is also supported by the Emerald Ribbon Master Planning Process that will begin in 2022 which will guide future development of the Jordan River Corridor. Allen Park Revitalization and Access Ask: $9 million Description: Allen Park is a recently acquired, 7-acre park located off 1300 E established in 2020. This project would implement a community supported vision and improvements for Allen Park and the preservation of iconic structures and landscapes that exist within the park. This project would improve public park access by restoring historic structures, bridges and the road, and would improve climate resiliency through stream bank, floodplain and landscape restoration. Outcomes: This funding would complete Phase 2 of improvements at Allen Park. The bond would fund stabilization, renovation, and restoration of the main Allen Lodge, to open for public use, preservation of artworks, and stream corridor improvements for air and water quality. Improvements will also include irrigation and native plantings, road repairs and stabilization of other structures as applicable and feasible. Justification: This project is supported by the Master Plan transformative project Sustaining Our Stories. Allen Park is a highly historic and cultural site in need if immediate preservation and rehabilitation to maintain integrity. Waterwise native plantings and trees will improve air quality and lower temperatures of the surrounding urban area. Stream restoration and rehabilitation, as well as removal of potentially hazardous infrastructure can improve stream and environmental quality. Current Process: Public Lands is in the final stages of completion of the Allen Park Cultural Landscape Report. (Anticipated Completion in Fall 2022.) Engagement for the Adaptive Re-use and Management Plan for Allen Park that will guide the future of this unique public park will begin Fall 2022. This project would implement community supported vision and improvements for Allen Park and the preservation of iconic structures and landscapes that exist within the Allen Park. Reimagine Seven Community and Neighborhood Parks Ask: $7 million Description: Neighborhood parks are smaller scale parks located throughout our communities. These parks have a small service area which creates the opportunity for local, targeted revisioning to restore and enhance these parks. This project identifies seven parks, one in each city council district, to undergo a visioning process and make identified improvements. These parks were identified through Public Lands information about the condition and utilization of parks in each district. The proposed parks are: District 1: Madsen Park District 2: Poplar Grove Park District 3: Warm Springs Park District 4: Reservoir Park District 5: Jefferson Park District 6: Donner Trail Park/Rotary Glen Park District 7: Fairmont Park N. Entry/McClelland Trail Outcomes: This funding would replace failing assets, increase elements of placemaking based on community input and desires, and multilingual wayfinding signage. Justification: Reimagine Neighborhood Parks was one of the most important transformative projects identified by the community in the Master Plan. Investing in these parks throughout the city will improve access and activation while also weaving in elements of community identity offering higher- quality park experience for users. Current Process: This funding would kick off district-specific public engagement to determine the specific amenities, improvements and placemaking elements that will be incorporated into each park. Fleet Block New Park Ask: $5 million Description: The Fleet Block is a 10-acre city block owned primarily by the city. The Granary District is a greenspace desert in one of the lowest served areas in the city. This district has less walkable park access than any other planning area, it has the highest population density and is slated to receive the highest levels of residential growth. In 2020, the unused building on Fleet Block became home to murals of individuals lost locally and nationally to police violence which transformed the space into a key memorial and gathering space. There is an opportunity to preserve and enhance the existing memorial space in the next iteration of Fleet Block through the thoughtful design and creation of a park on the block. Outcomes: This funding will support the creation of a new park, play area and pathways in an area of SLC that currently has few places to play. Public art and sport courts have been identified by current public engagement and will be constructed as part of this bond. In addition, the project will add much needed green space which will increase the level of service for the city and this community. Justification: This project is further supported by the Master Plan transformative project Sustaining our Stories. The Central Community Master planning area is one of the city’s highest needs areas with the least access to green space. Integration of a green park space would improve air quality with plantings and trees, reduce temperatures and the effects of urban heat island in the heart of the city, and begin to fulfill the need for access to open space in this area. Further, there has been unanimous desire from the public around the need for significant open space and recreation opportunities on the site. Current Process: A current process is underway from the Mayor’s Office to rezone the Fleet Block for development and create a community vision. Years of community engagement have called for significant open space and recreation opportunities on the Fleet Block. Liberty Park Playground Ask: $2 million Description: The current Liberty Park Rotary Playground is nearing the end of its useful life and will be in need of replacement for the safety of the users. This project will seize the opportunity to re-envision this site to ensure it remains a popular and community-serving asset for decades to come. The future of this site will be rooted heavily in community input and will reflect the desires of users citywide. Outcomes: This funding would fully replace the existing playground and associated amenities for the surrounding area. The new flagship playground would be customized for Liberty Park and state-of-the- art design to honor the popularity and use of the site. Justification: This project is supported by the Master Plan transformative project Coming to a Park Near You. This project will improve safety for users and give Salt Lake City the opportunity to incorporate a unique playground that stands out in the state. Liberty Park is the most utilized park in the city by far and will continue to be a beloved community asset for years to come. Current Process: Community engagement will guide the vision and redevelopment of this play space and will be conducted upon funding to determined specific amenities and playground design. Folsom Trail Completion and Landscaping Ask: $5 million Description: The Folsom Trail is an off-street, paved walking and bicycling path. Significant sections of this trail were completed in 2021, but due to issues with Union Pacific property the section of trail from 1000 W to the Jordan River was not completed. This phase would complete the final phase and fund additional landscaping improvements throughout the corridor. This project will improve east-west connection across the city and will provide easier access to public spaces for those utilizing alternative transportation. In addition, the landscaping and tree plantings of Phase 1 will be drought tolerant, native plants and trees that take into consideration our arid climate to conserve water and improve air quality. Outcomes: Completion of the paved walking/biking path from 1000 West to the Jordan River Parkway (approximately .5 miles), and Phase 1 landscaping along street intersections at 600 W, 800 W, Jeremy, 900 W and 1000 W along the trail. Justification: This project was identified in the Master Plan. The Folsom Trail will provide key walking and biking opportunities. Planting native and drought tolerant species will improve air quality while conserving water. Current Process: Daylighting feasibility and preliminary designs are underway, including cost estimating, and anticipated to be completed by Oct 2022. Daylighting is not included in this project-- anticipated daylighting costs are $15-$20 Million. Revenue Bond Pioneer Park Ask: $10 million Description: The Pioneer Park vision plan identified specific projects for improvements and amenities at Pioneer Park based on robust community engagement. The vision plan was complete in 2021 with over 1000 participants weighing in on the vision. As funding becomes available, phased implementation of the community priorities outlined in the vision plan will be possible. Outcomes: Public Lands currently has just over $3 million for Phase 1 of implementation. The bond funding would allow for expansion of Phase 1 and would make significant progress towards the complete build-out of the vision plan. Potential amenities that were ranked highly among participants of public engagement included a misting water feature, improved dog park, playground and state-of-the- art custom pavilion. This project will increase climate resiliency with native, waterwise plantings, increase access to active recreation and open space through park development, and incorporation of new tree plantings will work towards improving air quality. Justification: The Public Lands Master Plan identifies a need for investment in Pioneer Park to transform it into a vibrant, flagship downtown park. The 2019 adopted Public Lands Needs Assessment found that the downtown and central city neighborhoods have the fastest rate of population growth with the lowest level of park service. In fact, the average level of service throughout the city is 3.5 acres of parkland and 8.6 acres of natural land per 1,000 residents. In the downtown/Central City area, that number is 2.8 acres of parkland and 0.0 acres of natural lands. Pioneer Park is the only community-sized park in downtown Salt Lake City. The acres of parks we do have in this area have a larger weight to carry, with 37,000 employees commuting into the city every day, and should be designed to encourage use and accommodate many different needs. Pioneer Park can meet these needs for green space with investments that will improve activation and combat community dissatisfaction in the park. Current Process: The Pioneer Park Vision Plan has been completed and funding has been secured for Phase 1. Public engagement for the vision plan is complete, and the park is ready for construction document design. Cemetery Roads & Irrigation Ask: $11.2 million Description: The Salt Lake City Cemetery is in need of infrastructure replacement that has been identified both in the Cemetery Master Plan and in the Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan. This project would consist of an irrigation overhaul, including replacement of mainlines, control wiring and valves on the east portion of the Cemetery, and would additionally replace approximately 70% of the failing roads within the Cemetery, equating to approximately 5.4 miles of new road. Outcomes: Completion of these projects would improve access to the Cemetery, as well as climate resilience. Currently, the irrigation at the cemetery is outdated and is not efficient in conserving water and keeping vital vegetation alive during draught. The new irrigation system would allow for more water-conscious watering practices while keeping trees in the nationally accredited arboretum, alive. Additionally, the roads have the potential to pose safety risks into the future as they are failing and in need of repair. Justification: Community engagement was conducted through the Cemetery Master Planning process and has informed these specific priority projects within the Cemetery. Additionally, the Public Lands Master Plan identifies this work as providing a connection between the public and accessible green space. The plan specifically calls for the city to protect the cemetery as an iconic site and invest to promote it as a public, open space asset. Current Process: Cost estimating for these projects has been outlined in the Cemetery Master Plan and has resulted in an $11.2 million request. Public engagement is complete and both projects are ready for construction document design. Urban Wood Reutilization Program Ask: $2 million Description: The Public Lands Urban Wood Reutilization Program will allow the city to begin the process of reusing wood from fallen and removed trees throughout the city, as playground mulch and building materials, etc. to minimize landfill impacts, and provide sustainable reuse of materials and result in cost savings. Outcomes: The completion of this project would include construction of site and storage for the equipment needed to operate a wood reutilization program, which may include a horizontal grinder, sawmill, mini loader, storage and operations structure, fleet awning and forestry yard. Bond funding would not be used for the purchase of operations equipment and separate one-time funding would be needed to complete the project. Ongoing costs include the addition of one FTE and basic office supplies and equipment. Completion of the project would result in cost savings for the city (in hauling and dumping as well as purchase of mulch) and would decrease waste in city landfill and increase the sustainability of our Urban Forestry practices. Justification: This project was specifically identified in the Master Plan. Additionally, with repurposing of wood, reducing trips to the landfill, and repurposing materials in-house, this project will contribute to better air quality and more sustainable operations for Public Lands. Current Process: Public Lands has been investigating this program for several years. The 40 acres adjacent to the Public Lands building has been identified as a preferred location for the Urban Wood Reutilization Program. However, recent development proposals of this property have prompted investigation into alternative sites. If the Urban Wood Reutilization Program is not able to be housed at the Public Lands building, the alternative preferred location would be at the Salt Lake City Modelport (7595 West California Avenue). CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Allison Rowland Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:July 12, 2022 RE: INFORMATIONAL: UPDATE ON THE ANTI-GENTRIFICATION AND -DISPLACEMENT PLAN, THRIVING IN PLACE ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will receive an update from the Department of Community and Neighborhoods (CAN) about work on the City’s anti-gentrification and -displacement plan, known as Thriving in Place. This update builds on the one presented in the April 12 work session and will include results of the team’s community engagement efforts and “data mapping” to date, as well as refinements to the plans for the next phase. The anti-gentrification and anti-displacement plan, which got underway in September 2021, is intended to identify policy measures that can help current residents remain in Salt Lake City as it grows and changes. These policies will be developed from the Plan’s research on gentrification pressures in Salt Lake City and patterns of involuntary displacement, including those related to escalating housing costs, eviction, and demolition. The transmittal notes that the team’s research so far “illuminates the need for immediate and urgent action and stresses the importance of continuing to build on the extensive work, energy, and funding Salt Lake City and partners have contributed to affordable housing solutions over the past decades.” The next phase of the project will focus on developing policy recommendations and collaborative solutions, including a displacement mitigation plan. CAN expects to return to the Council in September with proposed policy solutions. More information about the plan is available on the Thriving in Place website, which is available in English and Spanish. Item Schedule: Briefing: July 12, 2022 Set Date: n/a Public Hearing: n/a Potential Action: n/a Page | 2 Goal of the briefing: Receive an update and provide feedback on the ongoing work for the City’s Gentrification and Displacement Plan, known as Thriving in Place, in compliance with the Council’s policy on mid-terms plan updates. ADDITIONAL AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION A.Background 1.June 2020: In the FY21 annual budget, the City Council allocated funding for a Gentrification Assessment and Displacement Mitigation Plan to understand the breadth and depth of involuntary displacement and formulate policies and programs to mitigate any such displacement. 2.December 2020: The Department of Community and Neighborhoods (CAN) presented The Future of Housing: A Collective Vision for an Equitable Salt Lake City to the City Council. The intent of that presentation was to discuss various housing policy topics identified as goals in Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan. 3.September 2021: A consultant team was retained through a City Request for Proposals (RFP). The Administration selected Baird & Driskell to oversee the Gentrification Assessment and Displacement Mitigation Plan, now called Thriving in Place. The full team includes: Baird & Driskell Community Planning (led by David Driskell); Urban Displacement Project, University of California Berkeley (led by Dr. Tim Thomas); and A team from the Department of City and Metropolitan Planning, University of Utah (led by Dr. Ivis Garcia and Dr. Alessandro Rigolon). 4.April 2022: The Council received an update from CAN about work on the City’s anti-gentrification and anti-displacement plan, Thriving in Place. It included information on new Utah statutes that are applicable to housing loss mitigation, and an analysis of the City’s existing housing loss mitigation ordinance. B.2022 Utah State Legislature Updates Two new laws from the 2022 Utah Legislative session—House Bill 462, Utah Housing Affordability Amendments, and House Bill 303, Local Land Use Amendments—have elements that are related to anti- gentrification and anti-displacement. 1. HB 462 and HB 303 define moderate income housing as 80% AMI or below. These two policies are compatible with the City’s proposed Affordable Housing Zoning Incentives, RMF-30, Shared Housing, Parking Reduction, and Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinances. 2. Elements of these statutes also apply to the establishment of a Housing Loss Mitigation fund and the City’s ability to require moderate-income housing units in a land use decision: a. HB 462 authorizes a city to establish a Housing Loss Mitigation fund to preserve existing, subsidized, and new moderate-income housing (lines 708-710). b. HB 303 states that a city may require moderate income housing units as a condition of approval of a land use application only if the developer and the city enter into a written agreement, or the city provides incentives that are agreed to by the developer (lines 828- 838). It does not specify that the written agreement must be a development agreement. Page | 3 3. Additionally, HB 303 prohibits a city from approving or denying a land use application based on a developer’s decision to incorporate moderate-income housing units in their development. Page | 4 POLICY QUESTIONS 1. In the briefing on April 12, it was mentioned that CAN staff and the City Attorney’s Office were evaluating tools that the City potentially could use to make mitigation of residential housing loss more effective, while complying with new State statutes and existing case law. The Council may wish to ask about the status of this work, and when it will be available. The Council also may wish to discuss the following policy questions, which staff adapted from some of the April transmittal’s Proposed Policy Considerations: 2.Is the Council’s objective with a housing loss mitigation policy to mitigate the loss of all housing or only the loss of affordable housing? If the objective is to target only affordable housing, the current ordinance could be amended to reflect that. This could also inform future policies included in the Thriving in Place plan. 3.On which stage of a proposed project should City housing loss mitigation policy focus—for example, demolition, plan approval, or some other stage? Note that this policy decision may affect the process for up-zoning decisions. Should the City’s policy require affordable units for an up-zone? 4.What are the policy objectives of a housing loss mitigation fee? Should the fee be paid to the RDA’s Housing Development Loan Program (where the City now concentrates resources for affordable housing development), or would the Council prefer it be paid to a to-be-created displacement mitigation program, which could also include other types of assistance? (Note: depending on the Council’s direction, City staff may need to analyze the amount of revenue that could accrue from a housing loss mitigation fee to assess whether it would be sufficient to either fund a new program or build affordable housing. In either case, the general fund may need to supplement this revenue). 5. Currently the City does not track affordable housing units unless the units have been subsidized by City, County, State, or Federal funds. Would the Council like to request that the Administration start tracking affordable units through the entitlement process or business license rental applications? The City does not currently have a mechanism to track existing “naturally occurring” affordable housing units, either. Would the Council like to ask the Administration about the resources that would be necessary to track these existing units? 6.Would the Council like to include a focus on displacement and loss of local businesses, as well as affordable housing? Salt Lake City’s Anti-Displacement Strategy CITY COUNCIL SESSION July 12, 2022 1 What We Heard 2 What We Learned 3 What Comes Next Two Project Phases PHASE 1 Listening and Learning January – May 2022 PHASE 2 Crafting Collaborative Solutions June – August 2022 Key Takeaways •Displacement pressures in Salt Lake City are high, and getting worse •It is impacting many people, in many areas •We are losing diversity •There are no relief valves •Phase One results are a Call to Action What We Did ●Project website 4,000+ visitors ●Online survey 2,152 responses; 42% in person ●Community events 8,400+ community interactions ●Community liaisons 6 liaisons; 14 engagements ●Focus groups 5 focus groups, multi-lingual ●Youth workshops 7 workshops; 200+ participants Getting the Word Out ●Door hangers ●Postcards ●Posters ●Stencils ●Tabling ●Presentations ●Social media posts ●Email blasts Community Liaisons ●Members of community ●Relationships of trust ●Formal and informal methods ●Multiple languages Youth Workshops ●Seven workshops ■Glendale Middle School ■Jackson Elementary ■Pacific Heritage Academy ●Interactive activities ●200+ participants Who We Heard From (Survey Respondents) ●2,152 participants ●42% in person (intercept surveys) ●95% in English; 5% in Spanish ●82% residents of SLC; 68% in SLC workforce; 20% in school ●44% renters; 42% homeowners ●Roughly representative of citywide population in racial diversity and income What We Heard ●High levels of concern about gentrification and displacement (only 7% are not concerned) ●Nearly half know people who were evicted or had to move ●Nearly a third said they had to move or are on the verge of moving due to a rent increase ●Over a third want to buy a home but can’t afford to and are considering leaving SLC What We Heard ●3 out of 4 people point to the lack of affordable housing as the primary driver of displacement ●Over 40% also point to new development and to a lack of housing overall ●A third point to demolition or renovation of older buildings ●Only 11% think gentrification is a good thing What We Heard Re: neighborhood improvements they would like: ●62% - more housing affordability ●41% - more housing options ●30% - more homeless services ●30% - more diverse people and cultures ● 3% - no change desired Dig Into the Data! ●Visit the project webpage (ThrivinginplaceSLC.org) ●Explore the survey results by: ○income ○race/ethnicity ○owner/renter ○Council district ●Explore input from the focus groups, interviews and youth workshops, too! What Comes Next ●Work sessions this week with City Steering Committee and Community Working Group ●Develop the draft framework for action and specific policy/program options ●Engage community in evaluating options ●Return to share input and draft recommendations SLC Estimated Displacement Risk Model ●Shows where 0%-50% AMI & 50%-80% AMI displacement is occurring ○Probable (light orange) ○1 income group (orange) ○Both income groups (red) ●Probable displacement in the west ●Higher rates for both income groups (red) east of the Granery & south of Central Ninth & Ballpark Affordable Markets + Displacement ●Hash marks show overall displacement ●All “more” affordable markets are experiencing displacement ●A few “less” affordable tracts in the southeast ●There are NO “more” affordable tracts for households to move to when displaced Key Takeaways •Displacement in Salt Lake City is significant and is getting worse. •There are no “more affordable” neighborhoods in Salt Lake City where families can move once displaced. •Salt Lake City is growing and there aren’t enough affordable units for low-income families. •Almost half of Salt Lake City households are rent burdened. •More than half of all families with children live in displacement risk neighborhoods. •Latinx and Black households have median incomes that are lower than what is required to afford rent in the city. •Displacement affects more than half of White households in Salt Lake City and disproportionately affects households of color. •Many areas experiencing high displacement risk were redlined in the past and are still highly segregated today. Questions? Sign up to receive project updates: ThrivingInPlaceSLC.org ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: June 24, 2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: Update on the status of the Thriving in Place plan. STAFF CONTACT: Blake Thomas, Director, Community and Neighborhoods, 385-270-4638, blake.thomas@slcgov.com Angela Price, Policy Director, Community and Neighborhoods, 385-315-9024, angela.price@slcgov.com Susan Lundmark, Project Manager, Transportation Division 801-535-6112, susan.lundmark@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Written briefing RECOMMENDATION: No action needed BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In June 2020, the City Council allocated FY21 funding for a Gentrification Assessment and Displacement Mitigation Plan, or Thriving in Place (TIP), to understand the breadth and depth of involuntary displacement and formulate policies and programs to mitigate displacement in the City. The TIP team intends to bring information related to this effort to the City Council early and often so the Council can remain informed and be engaged in the project process. As such, the City Council received a briefing on TIP by City staff and the consultant team, led by Baird & 6/27/2022 6/27/2022 Driskell Community Planning, in April 2022, in addition to this update at the conclusion of Phase 1 (Listening and Learning; see below). The project is organized into two phases: • Phase 1 – Listening and Learning o Includes extensive community engagement, such as focus groups, citywide survey (both online and intercept/in-person surveys), youth workshops, and data mapping and interpolation. • Phase 2 – Crafting Collaborative Solutions o Includes developing policy recommendations and identifying a shared framework that can guide action across sectors, including the City, other governmental agencies, and community-based organizations and partners to help mitigate involuntary displacement. Phase 1 – Results This summary and attached presentation in Exhibit 1 provide the City Council with an update on the results of Phase 1 “Listening and Learning” and kicks off efforts for Phase 2 with City Council to work together to Craft Collaborative Solutions. In addition to survey results and in-person engagement analysis, the attached set of slides shows the results of some of the most advanced, cutting-edge, and groundbreaking displacement risk mapping analysis in the country, conducted by consultant team members from the Urban Displacement Project of University of California Berkeley. That said, it is important to acknowledge limitations that inherently come with data analysis of this type. Namely, the data model uses 2015-2019 data (the most recent data available) that reflects displacement risk at this time. As such, the mapping results likely underestimate current displacement risk. Furthermore, the data model focuses on displacement risk for renters only and does not model risk for homeowners, as renters are disproportionately impacted by neighborhood change. While the analysis and data results presented in Exhibit 1 are critical to understanding displacement factors and risks, it is equally important to hear and honor the voices and lived experiences of those impacted by displacement. In the coming weeks, the full Phase 1 results will be available on the project website (thrivinginplaceslc.org) and the team encourages the City Council and public to review both the data and stories captured there. While keeping the lived experience of those impacted by displacement at the center, the following key takeaways are summarized from the Phase 1 analysis: • Displacement pressures are high and getting worse. • There are no “more affordable” neighborhoods in Salt Lake City where households can move once displaced. • Salt Lake City is growing and there aren’t enough affordable units for low-income households. • Just less than half of Salt Lake City households are rent burdened. • More than half of all households with children live in displacement risk neighborhoods. • Displacement affects more than half of White households in Salt Lake City and disproportionately affects households of color. • The mismatch between incomes and rents is particularly significant among Latinx and Black households. • Many areas experiencing high displacement risk were redlined in the past and are still highly segregated today, with current trends and impacts exacerbating historic inequities. The list of key points above illuminates the need for immediate and urgent action and stresses the importance of continuing to build on the extensive work, energy, and funding Salt Lake City and partners have contributed to affordable housing solutions over the past decades. The full Phase 1 analysis shows that displacement impacts are not limited to Salt Lake City, affecting cities and counties along the Wasatch Front, furthering our need for other cities and the State to address housing affordability in a holistic manner. The Administration welcomes the opportunity to work with the City Council in work sessions or small group meetings to discuss data results and seek guidance on policy directives to mitigate involuntary displacement and create a more equitable Salt Lake City. In addition, the TIP Plan will inform the update to Growing SLC, which will be underway shortly. Both plans will be brought before the City Council throughout the process and will be presented for adoption when completed. Phase 2 – Crafting Collaborative Solutions As stated above, the results of Phase 1 analysis are a call to action and the team is starting work on Phase 2, which includes meetings with the Community Working Group, members of the City Steering Committee, and other key stakeholders to identify areas for policy recommendations. As part of this process, the team will analyze existing policies and propose new policies, programs, and resources that could be adopted by the City and partners to mitigate displacement pressures now and in the future. The Consultant team is surveying national best-practices to help develop potential solutions and Phase 2 will include a second round of public engagement to allow residents the opportunity to weigh in on policies, programs, and resources that could be prioritized. Policy recommendations and proposals will be brought before the City Council for consideration and discussion at the end of the summer/early fall so the Council has an opportunity to weigh in and collaborate on policy solutions. It should be acknowledged that while at least some proposals the Consultant team will put forth during Phase 2 will be specific to the City, displacement pressures are regional in nature and require regional solutions. Timeline and Next Steps: Phase 1 of the project, Listening and Learning, is now complete. Phase 2, Crafting Collaborative Solutions, will run through at least August 2022. The team will return to both the Planning Commission and the City Council when policy recommendations are prepared to request feedback and policy discussion. Some key anticipated dates are below: • July 12 – presentation to City Council for Phase 1 results. • July 12, 13, and 14 – consultant team visit to Salt Lake City to include City Steering Committee and Community Working Group meetings, neighborhood tours, in-person analysis, and meetings with key stakeholders for potential policy discussions. • June/July – Phase 2, including preliminary policy options and near-term recommendations. • July/August – Evaluation of policy options and refinement of recommendations. • July/August – Presentation and discussion with Planning Commission on TIP recommendations. • August/September – Presentation to City Council on TIP recommendations with opportunity for questions, feedback, and discussion. • September/October – Planning Commission and City Council process for TIP adoption. PUBLIC PROCESS: Briefing EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1 – Presentation of Phase 1 Results Salt Lake City’s Anti-Displacement Strategy CITY COUNCIL SESSION July 12, 2022 1 What We Heard 2 What We Learned 3 What Comes Next Two Project Phases PHASE 1 Listening and Learning January – May 2022 PHASE 2 Crafting Collaborative Solutions June – August 2022 Key Takeaways •Displacement pressures in Salt Lake City are high, and getting worse •It is impacting many people, in many areas •We are losing diversity •There are no relief valves •Phase One results are a Call to Action What We Did ●Project website 4,000+ visitors ●Online survey 2,152 responses; 42% in person ●Community events 8,400+ community interactions ●Community liaisons 6 liaisons; 14 engagements ●Focus groups 5 focus groups, multi-lingual ●Youth workshops 7 workshops; 200+ participants Getting the Word Out ●Door hangers ●Postcards ●Posters ●Stencils ●Tabling ●Presentations ●Social media posts ●Email blasts Community Liaisons ●Members of community ●Relationships of trust ●Formal and informal methods ●Multiple languages Youth Workshops ●Seven workshops ■Glendale Middle School ■Jackson Elementary ■Pacific Heritage Academy ●Interactive activities ●200+ participants Who We Heard From (Survey Respondents) ●2,152 participants ●42% in person (intercept surveys) ●95% in English; 5% in Spanish ●82% residents of SLC; 68% in SLC workforce; 20% in school ●44% renters; 42% homeowners ●Roughly representative of citywide population in racial diversity and income What We Heard ●High levels of concern about gentrification and displacement (only 7% are not concerned) ●Nearly half know people who were evicted or had to move ●Nearly a third said they had to move or are on the verge of moving due to a rent increase ●Over a third want to buy a home but can’t afford to and are considering leaving SLC What We Heard ●3 out of 4 people point to the lack of affordable housing as the primary driver of displacement ●Over 40% also point to new development and to a lack of housing overall ●A third point to demolition or renovation of older buildings ●Only 11% think gentrification is a good thing What We Heard Re: neighborhood improvements they would like: ●62% - more housing affordability ●41% - more housing options ●30% - more homeless services ●30% - more diverse people and cultures ● 3% - no change desired Dig Into the Data! ●Visit the project webpage (ThrivinginplaceSLC.org) ●Explore the survey results by: ○income ○race/ethnicity ○owner/renter ○Council district ●Explore input from the focus groups, interviews and youth workshops, too! What Comes Next ●Work sessions this week with City Steering Committee and Community Working Group ●Develop the draft framework for action and specific policy/program options ●Engage community in evaluating options ●Return to share input and draft recommendations SLC Estimated Displacement Risk Model ●Shows where 0%-50% AMI & 50%-80% AMI displacement is occurring ○Probable (light orange) ○1 income group (orange) ○Both income groups (red) ●Probable displacement in the west ●Higher rates for both income groups (red) east of the Granery & south of Central Ninth & Ballpark Affordable Markets + Displacement ●Hash marks show overall displacement ●All “more” affordable markets are experiencing displacement ●A few “less” affordable tracts in the southeast ●There are NO “more” affordable tracts for households to move to when displaced Key Takeaways •Displacement in Salt Lake City is significant and is getting worse. •There are no “more affordable” neighborhoods in Salt Lake City where families can move once displaced. •Salt Lake City is growing and there aren’t enough affordable units for low-income families. •Almost half of Salt Lake City households are rent burdened. •More than half of all families with children live in displacement risk neighborhoods. •Latinx and Black households have median incomes that are lower than what is required to afford rent in the city. •Displacement affects more than half of White households in Salt Lake City and disproportionately affects households of color. •Many areas experiencing high displacement risk were redlined in the past and are still highly segregated today. Questions? Sign up to receive project updates: ThrivingInPlaceSLC.org CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Allison Rowland Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:July 12, 2022 RE: INFORMATIONAL: MIDPOINT CHECK-IN ON BALLPARK STATION AREA PLAN ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will receive a briefing on progress to-date in the new Ballpark Station Area Plan, which the Department of Community and Neighborhood Development (CAN) has been working on since October 2020. The purpose of the briefing is to update the Council at this midpoint in the process and receive comments and suggestions from Council Members on the draft plan. The plan is designed to guide future public and private investment in the vicinity of Smith’s Ballpark and the Ballpark TRAX Station, defined as roughly between 900 South to 1700 South, and State Street to the I-15 freeway. It recommends specific infrastructure improvements in the area to create a “heart of the neighborhood,” facilitate transit connections, and support “livability” and growth in residential, office, restaurant, and retail properties. The City’s Transportation Division was awarded a Transportation and Land Use Connection grant from the Wasatch Front Regional Council, which helped fund the draft Plan. The draft plan is premised in large part on continued use of the City-owned Ballpark facility by a privately- owned sports franchise. The Council and Administration have emphasized the importance of this private franchise continuing to operate in the City as a centerpiece to future planning and investment, and to the neighborhood as a whole. The draft plan recommends six “Big Moves”: -Create and apply a Ballpark neighborhood specific Transit Supportive Zone. -Reconfigure the Ballpark TRAX station -Improve 1300 South for pedestrians -Create a sense of place at and around the Ballpark -Repurpose parking lots and underutilized properties to add activity to the Heart of the Neighborhood -Invest in community amenities and green space to balance density with livability factors. Item Schedule: Briefing: July 12, 2022 Set Date: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Potential Action: N/A Page | 2 The Administration provides more detail on these “Big Moves” in their transmittal and will outline them in their presentation. Because of time constraints, this Council staff report focuses on policy questions the Council may wish to consider in their ongoing discussions about this and other planning and investment activities in the area. The Planning Commission will consider the draft plan and hear public comment at their July 27 meeting. After additional reviews and updates, the plan will be brought back to the Council for additional consideration and potential adoption later this year. Goal of the briefing: Receive an update and provide feedback on the ongoing work for the Ballpark Station Area Plan, in compliance with the Council’s policy on mid-terms plan updates. POLICY QUESTIONS A. The public investments proposed in the draft Ballpark Station Area Plan are substantial. The Council may wish to consider questions related to potential funding and timing of these investments, including the following: 1. In addition to funding this plan, the Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) was a member of the “Project Management Team,” along with members of the Utah Transit Authority. Would the Council like to request additional information on the ways these two entities have and will continue to participate in planning efforts? For example, will WFRC and UTA continue to provide technical and financial support in the implementation stages of this plan? 2. The draft plan’s section on case studies from other cities concludes that, “While a ballpark can help spur initial development and investment in an area, development or redevelopment efforts will often require additional supportive policies, financing, programs, and initiatives in order to truly maximize the investment in the Ballpark itself.” Would the Council like to request more details on how the Administration would ensure these additional resources are available? 3. The draft plan indicates that residents of the Ballpark Station Area are disproportionately white compared to other areas of the City, but their socio-economic profile is notably disadvantaged compared to the broader City and County. For example, the home ownership rate is 15% compared to 43% for the City as a whole. Median Household Income is just over $26,000 for the Ballpark Station Area, versus nearly three times that ($76,000) County-wide. Given the interest in equitable distribution of City funds, the Council may wish to ask the Administration how it views investments in this area compared to other neighborhoods in the City that have not received a proportionate share of public investment in the past. B. The Ballpark itself has long been an RDA project area, albeit a “non-collection” area (meaning no tax increment is collected within those boundaries, and property taxes are collected and accrue to the general fund in the same way as in the rest of the City). Would the Council like to inquire about whether the Administration envisions a change to this status, and what that might entail? C. The plan refers to a potential branch of the Salt Lake City Library system in the general Ballpark area. The FY23 adopted budget for the City Library includes a tax increase in part to pay for staffing and operations of a very small “storefront” type library, but not a full branch. The Council may wish to ask the Administration how they are coordinating with the Library Board (the policy-making body for the Library system) to ensure consistency in future budget and staffing proposals. D. Some of the public comments on the draft plan ask why it does not include the area from 1700 South to the I-80 freeway. Would the Council like to ask the Administration’s view on the advantages and Page | 3 disadvantages of focusing this plan only on the immediate area around the Ballpark TRAX stop and stadium? E. The draft plan mentions the potential of “Implement[ing] a district-parking strategy that utilizes unused area parking and parking garages for game days to minimize the need for parking fields in the area.” Would the Council like to ask for more information on this approach, and how it would work in practice? Are there examples to point to? F. The draft plan refers to several recent or ongoing City studies and policies that are issues of special Council interest, including housing affordability and involuntary displacement, transit, and public green spaces. Would the Council like to ask the Administration how coordination among departments and divisions is being handled to ensure that all parties have access to the most up-to-date information, and that new findings and policies are built into this plan as it develops into a final version? PLNPCM2022-00323 –SMALL AREA PLAN BALLPARK STATION AREA PLAN •Initiated December 2020 •Consultant GSBS •Within Central Community and Downtown Master Plans •Identifies Goals, Strategies, and Actions •Capitalizes on community assets BACKGROUND Salt Lake City // Planning Division •Online Survey Published March 2020. •Notices Sent To Entire Ballpark Community •Steering Committee Meetings Throughout 2021 •Project Webpage Created November 2021 •Planning Staff Attended Multiple Community Council Meetings PUBLIC PROCESS SMALL AREA PLANKEY CONCEPTS Salt Lake City // Planning Division Salt Lake City // Planning Division •Create a Ballpark Neighborhood Transit Supportive Zone. •Reconfigure TRAX station to an “urban” neighborhood integrated design. •Improve 1300 South for pedestrians •“Festival Street” on West Temple •Repurpose parking lots to add activity •Balance density with livability THE “BIG MOVES” Salt Lake City // Planning Division •Connectivity •Safer Bike and Pedestrian Network •Address Parking Needs •Alleyway Safety •Enhance Neighborhood Greenspace •Housing Opportunity and Displacement Mitigation •Improve Safety & Security GOALS, STRATEGIES, ACTIONS Salt Lake City // Planning Division FUTURE LAND USE MAP Salt Lake City // Planning Division TRANSPORTATION •Widening sidewalks •Prioritizing heavily uses corridors •Bike routes on major streets (300 W, Main St) •East/West bike routes (Paxton Ave, Kensington and Andrew Aves) •TRAX pedestrian connection at Lucy Ave Salt Lake City // Planning Division “FESTIVAL STREET” •On West Temple Street •From 1300 S to Albermarle Ave •Create community gathering space on game or nongame day events NEXT STEPS Salt Lake City // Planning Division Salt Lake City // Planning Division •December 2021 Through July 2022 •initial public review comments and subsequent modifications. •July 27th, 2022 •Planning Commission review, modifications, public hearing, and possible recommendation. •Summer Through Fall 2022 •City Council review, modifications, and possible adoption. TIMELINE Nan Larsen, Senior Planner Erin Mendenhall DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 4, 2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: PLNPCM2022-00323 – Ballpark Station Area Plan STAFF CONTACT: Nannette Larsen, Senior Planner, nannette.larsen@slcgov.com 801-535-7645 DOCUMENT TYPE: Information Only RECOMMENDATION: Review BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Ballpark Station Area Plan is intended to capitalize on the community assets and set a framework to help guide growth related issues and pressures and to keep the neighborhood as the home of baseball in Utah. The Station Area Plan will provide guidance on how the community grows and changes, with a focus on creating a safe and welcoming neighborhood. As demand for redevelopment in the neighborhood has grown so too has the need for a small area plan specific to the Ballpark Neighborhood. The Ballpark Station Area Plan will encompass the area that runs roughly between 900 South to 1700 South, and State Street to I-15. The small area plan’s boundaries are within both the Central Community Master Plan and the Downtown Master Plan. 4/5/22 4/8/22 The Ballpark Station Area Plan draft recommends “Big Moves” that will help transform the Ballpark Neighborhood and guide growth in the area. These goals include: • Create and apply a Ballpark neighborhood specific Transit Supportive Zone. • Reconfigure the Ballpark TRAX station • Improve 1300 South for pedestrians • Create a sense of place at and around the Ballpark • Repurpose parking lots and underutilized properties to add activity to the Heart of the Neighborhood • Invest in community amenities and green space to balance density with livability factors. The draft form of the Ballpark Station Area plan would establish goals and strategies to enhance the livability of the area. The goals here are broad in nature and direct future development in the community. The establishment of the goals of the neighborhood are included in pages 11 through page 15 of the draft plan. The strategies, scaled toward application, describe ways to implement the larger picture goal. Actions describe specific ways to implement the goal as development or redevelopment occur over a longer time frame. The key strategies and project section describe strategies to improve the ballpark station community and projects that would directly affect the community to bring about a positive change. These include: • Connectivity, which encompasses key actions such as: a complete sidewalk network, increase sidewalk width/buffers, provide pedestrian amenities, improve bike lane marking, enhance pedestrian-level lighting, support pedestrian-level street activation, enhance existing crossing, support mid-block crossings and alleyways • A safer bike and pedestrian network. To include: an upgrade to bike parking facilities, traffic signaling recognizing bikes on bikeways, and raised pedestrian crossing with crossing islands on high volume roads. • Address parking needs in the community. Key actions include: using shared parking systems, creating a shared parking agreement for game day events, and increasing bicycle parking options surrounding the ballpark • A focus on alleyway safety. Key actions to improve alleyway safety include: naming designated alleyways, implement new paving, materials, and colors, maintaining alleyways and provide space for art, provide pedestrian level lighting, and provide plants and greenery. Image 1: vicinity map of the Ballpark Station Area Plan • Enhance neighborhood greenspace is also a listed strategy. The key actions to implement include: treating public space as an object to work towards rather than “left over” space, integrate public space into community facilities lining public spaces with public uses, and creating a desirable place through the use of street design. • The draft Ballpark Station Area plan addresses housing opportunity and mitigating displacement. It is recommended that key actions to address this concern comprises of: providing clean, safe, and equitable housing options, and to provide opportunities for home ownership for a diversity of incomes. • Finally, safety and security are also listed as a strategy priority. The plan recommends key actions that provide appropriate lighting, transparent building fronts and improved visibility, and improved landscaping and visibility on public spaces. Implementation of the Ballpark Station Area plan would require zoning changes, infrastructure investments, and amenity investments which vary depending on the strategies proposed. At this time specific zoning changes haven’t been addressed within the Planning Department; we anticipate discussing zoning amendments once the Planning Commission has had the opportunity to review the small area plan. Infrastructure investment and amenity investments are addressed within the Key Actions to implement the small area plan. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Salt Lake City Transportation Division received a Transportation and Land Use Connection grant from the Wasatch Front Regional Council. • The creation of the plan began in December 2020. The consultant, GSBS, and city staff spent 9-months identifying goals and meeting with community members and stakeholders. • Consultant present to the Ballpark Community Council in December 2020. • Community members recommended by the Community Council leadership met to discuss goals, case studies, neighborhood needs, and draft plan. This steering committee met on February 4, March 11, April 8, and May 13, 2021. • Consultant distributed to every address within the project area information on the Ballpark project and an accompanying survey in February 2021. Information and survey were bilingual (English and Spanish). o Survey received more than 530 responses. • A Zoom community event was held by the consultant team on March 20, 2021. • A second community event was held by the consultant team on May 22, 2021. This community event was held at the Smith’s Ballpark and Watchtower Coffee and Comics. • Consultant published Ballpark Station Area Plan information page and interactive map online March, 2021. • Once a draft of the plan was complete staff started the public outreach process to identify concerns and receive feedback. The project’s website went live on November 24, 2021. • An open house was posted online on November 24, 2021. • Notice of the proposed Ballpark Station Area plan was sent to the Ballpark, Central 9th, and Liberty Wells Community Councils on November 24, 2021. • The Ballpark Community Council met on the proposed small area plan on December 6, 2021, through a Zoom meeting. o GSBS presented the plan to the community. Numerous comments were received, those notes are included. Numerous comments were received by City Staff, those comments are attached. As a result of the public comments City Staff received, modifications to the draft plan were forwarded to the consultant. Staff is waiting for an updated draft plan. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 14 OF 2020 In 2020 the City Council adopted resolution 14 of 2020. The resolution identifies various stages of the process for creating a master plan. The Ballpark Station Area Plan is considered a specific area plan, as compared to a citywide plan or a community plan, because the Ballpark Station Area Plan covers a smaller area within a larger community plan. The resolution identifies several points in the process for a check in with the City Council. Those check-ins are supposed to occur during the development of the scope of work and initial timeline, after an existing conditions report, and prior to the draft plan being presented to the Planning Commission. The Ballpark Station Area Plan followed a slightly different process because it was mostly funded through a Transportation-Land Use Connection Grant awarded to the city in spring of 2020. The City is required to pay at least 10% of the cost of the project. The grant application process required the creation of a general scope of work and goals for the project, which is typically required by the grant program to be submitted in the fall/early winter before the grant is awarded. In this case, that was in 2019. If awarded, the grant procurement process is done following the WFRC process because they manage the grant contract. This grant was awarded around the same time as Resolution 14 of 2022 was adopted and the funding became available after July 1, 2020. This transmittal is fulfilling the portion of the resolution that asks that the City Council be briefed on the plan prior to the Planning Commission process starting. NEXT STEPS: • The first round of modification to the draft Ballpark Station Area Plan were forwarded to GSBS for them to make those modifications. • Once City Staff receives an updated draft we anticipate notifying and returning to the appropriate Community Council meetings (Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells). If any changes to the draft plan are necessary City Staff will make those modifications. • A Planning Commission public hearing will be scheduled after meeting with the community councils and addressing concerns raised with the draft plan. We are hoping to schedule a public hearing late spring/early summer. • After the Planning Commission makes a recommendation to City Council the Ballpark Station Area Plan will return to City Council for a final determination on the small area plan. • It is anticipated that zoning changes necessary to establish the regulatory framework for implementation of the Ballpark Station Area Plan will begin after the draft is transmitted to the City Council. EXHIBITS: 1) Ballpark Station Area Plan Draft 2) Public Comments Received 1. BALLPARK STATION AREA PLAN DRAFT Prepared by Salt Lake City in partnership with Wasatch Front Regional Council and the Utah Transit Authority ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS STEERING COMMITTEE Amy Hawkins, Resident, Ballpark Community Council Bryan Kinneburg, Salt Lake Bees Ciara Combs, Resident Dave Morris, Business Owner, Piper Down Pub Dennis Faris, Volunteers of America Jennifer Luft, Resident Jonathan Foulk, Utah Pride Center Marc Amicone, Salt Lake Bees Maurice “Mo” Smith, Urban Indian Center Mike Tuiasoa, Business Owner, Watchtower Coffee & Comics Paul Johnson, Resident, Central 9th Community Council Rob Dutton, Business Owner, Lucky 13 Bar & Grill Robert Loftus, Resident Ryan O’Mahoney, Resident Sach Combs, Resident Shelley Bodily, Resident Terrell Bodily, Resident, Ballpark Community Council TECHNICAL TEAM Susan Lundmark, Project Manager, Salt Lake City Transportation Division * Megan Townsend, Wasatch Front Regional Council * Jordan Swain, Utah Transit Authority, Real Estate and TOD * Kevin Leo, former UTA Real Estate and TOD * Jeff Gulden, Salt Lake City Transportation Division John Anderson, Salt Lake City Planning Division Sean Fyfe, Salt Lake City Engineering Division Corey Rushton, Salt Lake City Public Services Department Corinne Piazza, Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency Julianne Sabula, Salt Lake City Transportation Division Jennifer Schumann, Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division Tony Milner, Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division Dillon Hase, Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division Paul Drake, UTA Real Estate and TOD Laura Hanson, former UTA Director of Planning Manjeet Ranu, former UTA Director of Capital Projects Eric Callison, UTA Manager of Service Planning Kayla Kinkead, UTA Strategic Planning Lauren Victor, Wasatch Front Regional Council * Project Management Team CONSULTING TEAM Christine C. Richman, AICP, GSBS Consulting Annaka Egan, AICP, GSBS Consulting Jason Claunch, Catalyst Commercial Reid Cleeter, Catalyst Commercial Jacob Farnsworth, P.E., RSP1 , Kimley-Horn Steven Chester, AICP, Kimley-Horn TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 The Station Area, Ballpark Community Council and Heart of the Neighborhood Boundaries .....1 Figure 1.2: Building Age Map ...............................................................................................................................................2 Figure 2.1: Aerial View of “Heart of the Neighborhood” Concept .....................................................................6 Figure 2.2: East Side Platform Access - North Concept ........................................................................................7 Figure 2.3: West Side Platform Access - North Concept ......................................................................................8 Figure 2.4: 1300 South Improved Pedestrian Realm ...............................................................................................9 Figure 2.5: Festival Street Concept ................................................................................................................................10 Figure 2.6: Ballpark Character Areas..............................................................................................................................13 Figure 2.7: Connectivity Map .............................................................................................................................................14 Figure 2.8: Connectivity Map-Regional Context .....................................................................................................16 Figure 2.9: Future Land Use Map .....................................................................................................................................17 Figure 2.10: Existing 1300 South Street Section for the Heart of the Neighborhood .......................................20 Figure 2.11: Proposed 1300 South Street Section for the Heart of the Neighborhood ......................................20 Figure 2.12: Ten “Big Ideas” for the Future of Green Space In SLC .................................................................23 Figure 2.13: Community Services and Non-Profit Organizations Map .........................................................24 Figure 3.1: Ballpark Regional Context Map ................................................................................................................26 Figure 3.2: Catalytic Project: Connecting Central Ninth to Ballpark .............................................................28 Figure 3.3: State Street Project Area Map .................................................................................................................29 Figure 3.4: Sidewalk and Transit Map .............................................................................................................................31 Figure 3.5: Information Page on the Project Website and Interactive Map ...............................................39 Figure 3.6: Project Post Card ...........................................................................................................................................40 Figure 3.7: Survey Results Showing What the Ballpark Community Likes in their Neighborhood .............................................................................................41 TABLE OF TABLES Table 1.1: Household Demographics for the Ballpark Station Area and Surrounding Region ..............3 Table 1.2: 2019 Estimated Annual Income for the Ballpark Station Area .......................................................3 Table 3.1: Race and Ethnicity in the Ballpark Station Area and Salt Lake City ..........................................27 Table 3.2: Ownership and Rentership Rates in the Ballpark Station Area and Surrounding Region ...................................................................27 Table 3.3: Income in the Ballpark Station Area and Surrounding Region ...................................................27 Table 3.4: Summary of Ballpark Case Studies .........................................................................................................33 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................i 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................................................1 2. The Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................................5 3. Community Exploration & Analysis .......................................................................................................................25 4. Implementation Plan .......................................................................................................................................................43 Appendix A. Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................................................................48 B. Highest & Best Analysis ........................................................................................................................................XX C. Transportation Analysis ........................................................................................................................................XX D. Moderate Income Housing Plan ........................................................................................................................XX E. Case Study Analysis ................................................................................................................................................XX F. Community Engagement Materials .................................................................................................................XX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Salt Lake City’s Ballpark Neighborhood is home to several community assets including the Smith’s Ballpark, home to the Los Angeles Angels AAA ballclub – the Salt Lake Bees, the Ballpark light rail station, several social service agencies, and the nearby Salt Lake Community College downtown campus. Throughout its history, the neighborhood has been home to the Ballpark at the corner of Main Street and 1300 South. Baseball has been a cornerstone for this area for more than 100 years. In 1993, Salt Lake City partnered with Salt Lake County and private entities to construct a new field and ballpark stadium to replace the structure that was originally built in 1915 and reconstructed in 1947 after a fire. The 1993 rebuild provided a state-of-the-art minor league stadium. A refresh and update of the stadium to current standards is now required. The Ballpark Neighborhood is adjacent to downtown, diverse, and growing. The area, which until recent years, was characterized by older, affordable single-family neighborhoods, light industrial uses, and big box stores is experiencing considerable development pressure. The pressure is expected to increase as Salt Lake City’s population and employment base continue to grow. The neighborhood includes several major transportation, transit, and emerging trail corridors that connect the area to downtown, the rest of the city, and the region. The area benefits from proximity to downtown. Because of development pressure and the presence of regionally significant transportation infrastructure, Salt Lake City’s Transportation Division sought and received a Transportation and Land Use Connection grant from the Wasatch Front Regional Council in partnership with Utah Transit Authority, to complete this station area plan. The planning area, referred to throughout the plan as the “Station Area,” is between 900 South and 1700 South and State Street and I-15. The purpose of the plan is to explore options to further integrate the Ballpark with the neighborhood, evaluate the transportation network and identify opportunities to improve transportation choices for the community, and take advantage of existing amenities and current development pressure to position the neighborhood for the future. Improved transportation choices include improved bus operations and circulation at and near the Ballpark TRAX station. The plan also recommends improved pedestrian and bicycle connections near the TRAX station, the Ballpark, and throughout the surrounding neighborhood to further improve the transportation network, better integrate the Ballpark and station into the neighborhood, and enhance livability as new development occurs. Plan goals, strategies and recommended actions were identified through a nine-month process that began in December 2020 with the launch of a website and interactive map in English and Spanish to generate input and ideas from the neighborhood and other stakeholders. Community engagement was ongoing throughout the planning process and included in-person, small group, and stakeholder meetings. The process also included the following studies: • Existing conditions analysis • Highest & best use analysis • Case study analysis The planning team and steering committee identified several key areas of focus for the plan. GROWTH & TRANSFORMATION New residential development in the Station Area has increased significantly and is occurring throughout the area. Former industrial, commercial, or low-density residential parcels are quickly becoming mid- to high-density residential developments. This new development has increased the density of the area and added hundreds of new housing units without adding additional services and amenities to the neighborhood. This is particularly pronounced west of the TRAX line where previous land uses – light industrial, flex uses, and big box retail did not attract investment in sidewalks, trails, or neighborhood level retail and services. This is also true along 1300 South where auto-oriented uses are transitioning to higher density uses to take advantage of the TRAX station and easy connections to West Temple and major arterials. These areas are difficult to navigate without a car and provide little pedestrian-level interest or comfort. This creates a disconnection between the existing neighborhood and new development. CONNECTIVITY & PEDESTRIAN/BIKING ENVIRONMENT The neighborhood has significant transportation infrastructure – a TRAX stop, two I-15 offramps (1300 South and 900 South), and several major and minor arterials. There are also offramps directly to the north and south of the project area on 2100 South and 600 South. These same transportation facilities create a challenging active transportation environment. The quickly redeveloping area west of the TRAX lines has limited access across the TRAX line to access the station, neighborhood amenities and services east of the rail line. PARKS, GREENSPACE & COMMUNITY FACILITIES Salt Lake City Public Services launched Reimagine Nature SLC Public Lands Master Plan process in April 2019 with the publication of the Salt Lake City Public Lands Needs Assessment. The assessment evaluated the level of parks, open space, and trails service in each of the city’s planning areas. The Station Area is in the Central City planning area. According to the 2019 assessment, Central City’s level of service is 2.8 park acres per 1,000 population, as compared to a city-wide level of service of 3.5 city-owned and managed park acres per 1,000 population. Much of the Station Area is identified as a High Need area according to the Needs Assessment. This means that additional park acres are needed in the neighborhood to serve current and future residents and visitors. The need for community amenities including parks, open space, and other community facilities such as a library or community center was identified during the community engagement process. The community also identified a lack of service and proper maintenance in current parks, such as missing trash receptacles and benches. They indicated that expanding park amenities and maintenance is a priority for creating clean and welcoming green spaces in the neighborhood. SAFETY & SECURITY Although addressing policing and safety is not part of the scope of this plan, the success of many of the recommendations in this plan depend on perceived and actual safety of pedestrian and bicycle connections, public open space and plazas, and community events and activities. Many of the recommendations to improve connectivity and pedestrian and biking safety can also improve overall perceived and actual safety in the Station Area through improved streetscapes and placemaking. The plan recommends goals and strategies to address the key areas identified in the planning process. The recommendations are summarized as six Big Moves. • Create and apply a Ballpark Station Area Transit Station Area zone in the area identified as the “Heart of the Neighborhood” • Reconfigure the Ballpark TRAX Station to improve access from the west • Improve 1300 South for pedestrians by creating new crossing and expanding and upgrading the pedestrian realm • Create a sense of place at and around the stadium • Repurpose parking lots and underutilized properties to add activity to the Heart of the Neighborhood • Invest in community amenities and green space to balance density with livability factors The plan identifies several tools to implement the recommendations. These tools include zoning changes and infrastructure and amenity investments. EXECUTIVE SUMMARYi ii View of the Smith’s Ballpark / Google Maps EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION This plan focuses on the Ballpark Station Area, defined as the area between 900 South and 1700 South and State Street and I-15. The Station Area is part of the Ballpark Community Council area, and part of Salt Lake’s Central City planning area. Figure 1.1 is a map of the Station Area within the Ballpark Community Council. In addition, the plan identifies opportunities and recommendations for the area immediately around the station and stadium. This is an area identified by the community as the “Heart of the Neighborhood” and is a ¼ mile radius around the Ballpark TRAX Station. BALLPARK AREA 1 I-80 I-15 I-15 I-80 Salt Lake City, UTSalt Lake City, UT Ballpark Regional Extent 0 10.5 Miles ballpark station 900 S 1700 S ST A T E S T 1300 S I-80 I-15 I-15 I-80 Salt Lake City, UTSalt Lake City, UT Ballpark Regional Extent 0 10.5 Miles ballpark station 900 S 1700 S ST A T E S T 1300 S Heart of the Neighborhood Ballpark Station Area Ballpark Neighborhood Boundary LEGEND FIGURE 1.1: THE STATION AREA, BALLPARK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AND HEART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD BOUNDARIES 0 600 1,200300Feet I-15 TE E R T S E T A T S 900 SOUTH 1700 SOUTH I-15 Legend Building Age Null pre 1950 1951-1960 1961-1970 1970-1980 1981-present FIGURE 1.2: BUILDING AGE MAP INTRODUCTION 2 The neighborhood is characterized by older buildings – both residential and commercial structures built before 1970 – and is unique in its composition of small businesses and residents of all backgrounds. Nearly 77 percent of structures in the Station Area are 50 years or older at the time of this plan. Figure 1.2, illustrates the age and lot size for the Station Area. Older structures – pink, yellow, and light green – are generally on small lots. Newer structures – medium and darker green – are on larger lots, generally consolidated from original small lots or on former rail-served industrial properties. In the single-family residential areas, the homes open onto the street and include front yards and stoops. In the 300 West area, newer commercial structures are primarily big box retail stores with large parking lots. Some of the newer development in the Station Area include higher density residential and office uses. This transition to higher density housing and office is expected to continue. INTRODUCTION 3 The Station Area has a higher rate of renter occupied units than Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County and the State of Utah, Table 1.1. The Station Area has, historically, been one of the more affordable neighborhoods in the city. As a result, current households reflect diverse backgrounds and a range of incomes. The median income for the Station Area is significantly lower than median income for the city and surrounding region as seen in Table 1.2. Continued affordability in the neighborhood is a challenge as new development occurs in this rapidly transitioning area. photo credit / caption Ballpark station Area Salt Lake City Salt Lake County Utah Total Households 1,854 82,259 397,918 1,050,542 Owner Households 15.3%41.3%61.8%63.1% Renter Households 78.6%51.7%33.2%27.0% Vacant Households 6.1%7.0%5.0%9.9% Families*768 41,258 277,473 781,973 Household Size 2.20 2.41 2.99 3.13 Source: ESRI TABLE 1.1: HOUSEHOLD DEMOGRAPHICS FOR THE BALLPARK STATION AREA AND SURROUNDING REGION Ballpark station Area Salt Lake County Salt Lake MSA*Utah Median Household Income $26,047 $76,410 $76,256 $73,015 Average Household Income $44,498 $99,988 $99,114 $92,612 Per Capita Income $19,992 $33,095 $32,666 $29,227 Source: ESRI *Metropolitan Statistical Area TABLE 1.2: 2019 ESTIMATED ANNUAL INCOME FOR THE BALLPARK STATION AREA *The U.S. Census Bureau defines family is a group of two people or more (one of whom is the householder) related by birth, marriage, or adoption and residing together. INTRODUCTION This plan is organized to focus on the recommended goals, strategies, and actions in Section I – The Plan with supporting analysis and information in Section II – Community Exploration & Analysis. Section II includes summaries of the public engagement process and Existing Conditions and Case Study Analyses completed as part of the planning process. Section III – Implementation Plan consolidates all goals, strategies, and actions identified in the plan with implementation time frame. A complete set of survey responses and public comments as well as the complete Existing Conditions, Case Study, and Highest and Best Use analyses, Transportation Analysis and other documents used to complete this plan are found in the Appendix. SECTION I THE PLAN IDENTIFIES: • The Big Moves contemplated in the plan • Goals, Strategies and Actions to implement the plan • A Future Land Use Map for the Station Area • Key Strategies & Projects to: +Improve the pedestrian experience +Address transit and transportation needs including »Connectivity »Transit »Parking strategy +Safety and security including »Street and pedestrian-level lighting »Building design »Landscape design +Enhancing neighborhood greenspace +Maximizing housing opportunity and mitigating displacement SECTION II COMMUNITY EXPLORATION AND ANALYSIS INCLUDES: • Overview of the planning process • Study area demographics • Summary of existing conditions including +Prior planning efforts +Connectivity and the pedestrian and biking environment • Summary of Station Area Case Studies including +Ballparks studied +Key Takeaways • Summary of public engagement SECTION III IMPLEMENTATION PLAN • Appendix +Existing Conditions +Highest and Best Analysis +Transportation Analysis +Moderate Income Housing Plan +Case Study Analysis +Community Engagement Materials 4 People’s Freeway Park / Google Maps 5 THE PLAN The Ballpark neighborhood is the home of the Salt Lake Bees, the Los Angeles Angels AAA club. The Bees and their home field are a community-wide asset that attracts visitors from throughout the state to attend annual home games. The Ballpark and neighborhood are supported by the Ballpark TRAX Station, and a regional transportation system. The area directly around the Ballpark includes, a plaza at the corner of 1300 South and West Temple, Fire Station 8, and parking fields on Salt Lake City-, and privately-owned lots on and around 1300 South and Main Street. The Plan recommends additional investment in the immediate Ballpark area and supporting infrastructure to create a “Heart of the Neighborhood,” increase livability factors, and support continued growth in residential, office, restaurant, and retail uses. The neighborhood is in transition from a downtown “support” neighborhood, providing housing and services outside of the core, to a more distinct urban center. The area has undergone several transformations in its history and the latest has the potential to be the most dramatic yet.. Recent development projects have added new multi- family housing in the area with densities ranging from 15 units to 60 units per acre. The neighborhood is expected to continue to play a role in meeting Salt Lake City’s demand for new housing. Preserving neighborhood livability becomes increasingly important as density and development occur. Livability factors identified by the neighborhood during the planning process include access to services and retail, walkability and connectivity, safety and security, and open space and community amenities. This Plan recommends policies, projects, and improvements to: • Accommodate growth, • Expand on current community investments and assets, and • Enhance livability throughout the neighborhood. the plan THE PLAN FIGURE 2.1: AERIAL VIEW OF “HEART OF NEIGHBORHOOD” CONCEPT THE BIG MOVES The plan contemplates several “Big Moves” that will help transform the neighborhood. These include: Create and apply a Ballpark neighborhood specific Transit Supportive Zone to the area around the Ballpark TRAX station along 1300 South from Main Street to 300 West that allows heights up to 120 feet with required enhancements to the public realm. Eligible enhancements may include pedestrian street lighting, street trees and public ground level uses such as restaurants or grocery space, retail or services. Figure 2.1 illustrates the opportunity to add density to the Ballpark site as well as the blocks to the north and west of the Ballpark. The concept also illustrates the importance of improvements, such as street lighting and wide sidewalks, to the public realm as density is added to the neighborhood. Current UTA parking lot at the Ballpark TRAX station / GSBS Consulting 6 THE PLAN7 Reconfigure the Ballpark TRAX station from a “suburban” park and ride to an “urban” neighborhood integrated format. This requires a new pedestrian/transit rider connection from the platform to 200 West/Lucy Avenue on the north end of the platform and loading areas on both the east and west side of the rail line allowing for an opportunity to increase passenger access. Figure 2.2 illustrates improved platform connectivity to the west. FIGURE 2.2: EAST SIDE PLATFORM ACCESS - NORTH CONCEPT Current view of west-side access to the TRAX platform / GSBS Consulting THE PLAN Improve 1300 South for pedestrians by creating new pedestrian crossings across 1300 South in addition to expanding and upgrading pedestrian ways to create a safe and comfortable walking environment. Figure 2.3 shows the potential for pedestrian crossings across 1300 South. Figure 2.4 shows improving sidewalks, street furniture, trees. In addition to improving sidewalks and adding pedestrian level lighting, the plan recommends the addition of street furniture, and trees. The concept contemplates the return of buses to 1300 South in accordance with the City’s Transit Master Plan. The plan recommends the 1300 South bus provide service to the Ballpark Station through an “in-line” bus stop. This means that riders making the transfer to or from the bus to TRAX would embark and disembark at stops on 1300 South and then access the platform either directly from the sidewalk for westbound buses or by crossing 1300 South for eastbound buses. Accommodating in-line bus service for riders of all abilities through a pedestrian crossing adjacent to the rail crossing arms likely requires some reconstruction on 1300 South to create a curb-less environment at the crossing. FIGURE 2.3: WEST SIDE PLATFORM ACCESS - SOUTH CONCEPT Current north access to the Ballpark TRAX Station / GSBS Consulting 8 THE PLAN9 Create a sense of place at and around the Ballpark. Create a sense of place through investment in community gathering spaces, streetscapes, and uses that encourage activity and interaction. The Ballpark is surrounded by wide sidewalks and an entry plaza. As any upcoming renovation and upgrades take place, the Ballpark itself could be reconfigured with active uses on the plaza and 1300 South frontage if possible. In addition, the plan recommends extending the opportunity for events on the sidewalk area on the west side of the Ballpark, along West Temple by investing in a “Festival Street” on West Temple from 1300 South to approximately Albermarle Avenue on the south. Figure 2.5 is a detail of the festival street concept. The festival street could be closed for special events, redirecting the traffic around the neighborhood. Such a festival street should embrace the Ballpark’s history though community art, historical interpretive fixtures, and programming. FIGURE 2.4: 1300 SOUTH IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN REALM Current east-facing view of 1300 South / GSBS Consulting THE PLAN FIGURE 2.5: FESTIVAL STREET CONCEPT Repurpose parking lots and underutilized properties to add activity to the Heart of the Neighborhood. Salt Lake City and UTA own large properties on the north side of 1300 South between Main Street and the TRAX line, currently used for surface parking, which are ideally located for redevelopment into dense housing, a community amenity or service, or office space with ground floor activating uses and an improved public realm. Heights of up to 120 feet will create an urban context for 1300 South adjacent to the TRAX station and ballpark. The 1300 South, Main Street and West Temple street frontages should be activated with uses such as restaurants, bars, coffee shops, and similar uses that build on the success of existing businesses that currently call the neighborhood home. In addition to the City- and UTA- owned lots there are underutilized parcels in the immediate vicinity of the Ballpark and station that are appropriate for higher density development and enhancement of the public realm. The newly identified State Street Project Area , created by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (RDA), has tools to help create the level of investment contemplated for the neighborhood. Invest in community amenities and green space to balance density with livability factors. The Ballpark neighborhood has limited green spaces and community amenities within its boundaries. As the neighborhood grows, additional parks and open spaces are needed to serve both current and future residents and employees in the area. In addition, the neighborhood lacks community spaces for indoor and outdoor community gatherings. The Ballpark plaza and festival street can address the need for outdoor community gatherings, but space for indoor community gatherings is needed. The Station Area is undeserved for community facilities such as a library or community center. As redevelopment occurs in the Heart of the Neighborhood and at the current Public Utilities facility, a location for parks, open space, a library, community center, or combined facility should be identified and pursued. Proposed festival street location on West Temple / GSBS Consulting 10 THE PLAN | GOALS, STRATEGIES & ACTIONS11 GOALS, STRATEGIES & ACTIONS Members of the Ballpark Station Area have participated in several planning projects over the last several years that included neighborhood-wide conversations about goals for the future of the area. The goals and ideas identified in the prior planning processes were confirmed during this Ballpark Neighborhood Station Area planning process. The neighborhood identified the following goals to enhance livability and accommodate anticipated growth. GOAL: Take advantage of current development opportunities, existing services, and amenities to enhance neighborhood livability. The Ballpark and its supporting infrastructure are at the geographic and emotional “heart” of the neighborhood. The neighborhood accommodates and enjoys the vibrancy of game days and would like to see game day vibrancy on more days of the calendar and in all seasons. Several strategies are recommended to enhance vibrancy and leverage the community’s investment in the neighborhood. STRATEGIES: • Implement the goals and strategies identified in: »Life on State Implementation Plan (not adopted) »Central 9th Chapter of the Downtown Master Plan »300 West Reconstruction »Homeless Resource Centers Neighborhood Action Strategies »State Street Project Area Plan »Salt Lake City Moderate Income Housing Plan »Salt Lake City Parks & Public Lands Needs Assessment »Citywide Gentrification Assessment & Displacement Mitigation Plan »Growing SLC »The Salt Lake City Street Lighting Master Plan • Update the city’s zoning code and map, as appropriate to implement the provisions of this plan: ACTIONS: +Amend Section 21A.26.078: TSA Transit Station Area District of the Salt Lake City Municipal Code to include the Ballpark Station Area as one of the existing TSA districts or create a new one if needed. • Require activation of the 1300 South frontage with restaurants, shops, street furniture and trees. • Implement streetscape improvements to accommodate pedestrian volumes. • Allow heights comparable to heights in other Urban Station Areas. • Protect the viewshed of the Wasatch Range from inside Smith’s Ballpark. +Evaluate and amend the City’s zoning code and map, as appropriate to include the urban design considerations identified in each of the character areas in this plan. +Evaluate and amend the City’s zoning code and map, as appropriate, to extend the existing State Street Overlay Zone to the west side of Main Street. +Evaluate and amend the City’s zoning code and map, as appropriate to implement the following priorities for the 300 West Character Areas: • Ensure that amenities, connections, and services needed to support higher density development are included in development plans for the area. • Require development proposals to include mid-block and other connections to break down current large commercial blocks into smaller, more walkable blocks. • Where appropriate, development proposals incorporate access to existing and planned TRAX crossings. • Identify opportunities to provide community amenities, shops, and services within the heart for year-round activation. • Provide enhanced street and pedestrian lighting to improve safety and visibility. GOAL: Create a dense urban environment and entertainment zone around the Ballpark. STRATEGIES: • Invest in the station area and around the Ballpark to improve the overall neighborhood and enhance the opportunities in the Heart of the Ballpark. ACTIONS: +Improve east-west connectivity across TRAX to the north and the south of 1300 South. At a minimum, pedestrian/bicycle crossings should be identified to allow pedestrians and cyclists to move east to west without having to go to 1300 or 1700 South. +Install side-loading platforms at the Ballpark TRAX Station. +Consider redeveloping the TRAX station parking lot and bus turnaround for higher density uses and to provide neighborhood amenities. +Install pedestrian crossings east and west of TRAX on 1300 South on either side of the UTA crossing barrier. +Consider redevelopment opportunities for the City-owned parking lot at 1300 South and West Temple while maintaining parking in the vicinity to potentially increase density and improve the urban environment. +Install a festival street on West Temple and plazas adjacent to the stadium. +Invest in a community amenity which may include a library with the opportunity of additional public space. +Integrate greenspace and “green” elements into the urban landscape. • Enhance public space surrounding the Ballpark and include public art and references to historical elements. THE PLAN | GOALS, STRATEGIES & ACTIONS • Designate West Temple between 1300 South and Albemarle Avenue as a Festival Street for non-gameday and gameday activation including: • Farmers Markets • Community Celebrations • Food Truck festivals • Neighborhood Concerts • Implement a district-parking strategy that utilizes unused area parking and parking garages for game days to minimize the need for parking fields in the area. • Enhance the Ballpark’s relationship with the neighborhood by identifying opportunities to activate the West Temple and 1300 South facades of the stadium on non-game days and incorporate public green space, non- motorized connections, plazas, and similar public spaces around the stadium. • If feasible, identify a strategy to bury power lines as development in the Ballpark Neighborhood occurs. GOAL: Increase connectivity in the station area. The neighborhood is well-connected to the regional transportation and transit networks; however, the infrastructure for that regional network also acts as a barrier to internal connectivity, which limit easy multi-modal access to the Ballpark TRAX Station, schools, and parks, and separates newly developing residential uses west of the TRAX line from the rest of the neighborhood. Strategies recommended to improve connectivity within the neighborhood and the pedestrian and biking environment are listed below. Opportunities to improve connectivity include new connections, improvement of existing connections and reconfiguration of the TRAX station platform. Figure 2.7 is a map of opportunities to create new connections within the neighborhood. As of the writing of this Plan the new connection across the TRAX rails to the north of the Ballpark Station platform at Paxton Avenue is planned for near-term construction by UTA. The concept includes improved connection from the existing TRAX platform to the west to improve connectivity to the new residential developments along the 300 West corridor. STRATEGIES • Improve overall connectivity and walkability in the area. ACTIONS: +Study the potential future lane reconfiguration of 1300 South to eliminate or narrow traffic lanes and expand and improve the sidewalk. +Utilize existing alleyways, midblock, and truncated connections to create a system of bike and pedestrian pathways through the neighborhood. +Implement the planned TRAX line pedestrian crossings to the north of the current Ballpark Station. +Widen and enhance sidewalks to improve pedestrian comfort through the addition of street furnishings, pedestrian lighting and a buffer from moving traffic. +Implement pedestrian level lighting to improve safety and visibility. +Establish specific bicycle routes through the neighborhood according to the Salt Lake City Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan. +Reconfigure Ballpark TRAX Station to change from a suburban-style station that has northern platform access only from the east parking lot into an urban-style station that allows access from both the east and west sides of the station. This would include new access at the north end of the platform from Lucy Avenue/200 West on the west side of the TRAX rails +Redevelop part of the current surface parking lots to transit supportive uses that include retail, shops, and service near the Ballpark Station platform. +Establish a pedestrian crossing to the east and west of the UTA crossing barrier across 1300 South. +Study future crossings south of the 1300 South crossing at the TRAX line. GOAL: Increase urban design quality. Neighborhood identity refers to the ability of residents and visitors to distinguish a place by unique and distinct characteristics. Supporting the neighborhood as a distinguishable place involves consideration for creating a balanced mix of uses, ensuring architectural and landscape character, embracing historic character and elements, spotlighting neighborhood, and regional amenities, and considering the surrounding land use and transportation context of the area. The Ballpark Station Area is made up of several distinct areas that have their own character as expressed by building massing, use, streetscape elements and overall design. This plan supports the distinctly different areas within the neighborhood through recommendations to preserve some elements and enhance others. The character areas are illustrated in Figure 2.6. Photo: GSBS Consulting 12 THE PLAN | GOALS, STRATEGIES & ACTIONS13 0 600 1,200300Feet 30 0 W E S T 900 S 1300 S 1700 S ST A T E S T MA I N S T Main street character area 300 West transitional area central ninth corridor plan life on state street improvements west temple character area “heart” of the neighborhood FIGURE 2.6: BALLPARK CHARACTER AREAS Main Street Character Area The Main Street Character Area is defined by the presence of small local businesses, a generally pleasant pedestrian and bike environment, and medium-density residential buildings. New development should focus on maintaining the scale, walkability, and bikability of the neighborhood. West Temple Character Area The West Temple Character Area has a mix of residential and small businesses along the corridor. It is also home to the Public Utilities facility, the Ballpark Neighborhood park, and Jefferson Park. New development should maintain the current character and scale of the area. New development adjacent to the stadium should support the installation festival street improvements adjacent to the Ballpark from 1300 South to Albemarle Avenue. This can help expand the existing plaza area, create new plaza areas, and allow for temporary closure for community and gameday events, while also providing opportunities for art and historical elements. New development should also enhance the biking and walking environment on West Temple and consider traffic calming measures in the more residential sections. State Street Character Area The State Street Character Area is defined primarily by small businesses running the length of the station area. This area is undergoing several changes guided by the Salt Lake City Transportation Division’s Life on State Bikeway Implementation project and the RDA State Street Project Area Plan. Central Ninth Character Area The Central Ninth Character Area is defined by several small businesses and larger multifamily structures. This area is transitioning into a node with various entertainment options and services. New development in the area should maintain the current scale and massing of new development along the 900 South Corridor and implement the recommendations and strategies identified in the Downtown Master Plan – Central 9th Chapter including the 9th South Viaduct Catalytic Project. 300 West Character Areas The entire corridor is transitioning from an industrial/major commercial to higher density mixed use. However, there are several sub areas with the 300 West corridor that are transitioning at different rates. East of 300 West and North of 1300 South This area is historically characterized by smaller industrial and residential uses. Property consolidation has occurred and will continue to occur as demand for housing continues. There are large multifamily developments proposed or recently approved for the area. This area also includes an unused rail spur that is proposed for a light rail extension into the Granary District and the possibility of an adjacent trail, which is also being evaluated. Connectivity within this area and to the south to the Ballpark TRAX Station is a key consideration for this area. In addition, opportunities to add open space, public amenities, and neighborhood serving commercial should be pursued. West of 300 West and North of 1300 South This area currently has a mix of big box commercial, and newer office and residential uses. The transition of smaller parcels to low- and mid- density office and higher density residential is expected to continue as is the continuation of existing big box uses. East of 300 West and South of 1300 South This area is experiencing transition around several large scale, long-term uses. Lowes Home Improvement, the Gail Miller Homeless Resource Center, and the Utah State Liquor Store are expected to remain as the area transitions to include several new multi-family developments. As with the area north of 1300 South connectivity within the area and to the east across the TRAX line is a key consideration. Public amenities and neighborhood serving commercial should also be added to this area. West of 300 West and South of 1300 South The Walmart big box store is in this area as well as small lot light industrial and warehouse uses. This area is expected to transition in the future. The considerations identified for the areas already transitioning should inform zoning and development considerations in this area. “Heart” of the Neighborhood This area is characterized by its proximity to the Ballpark Station, Smith’s Ballpark, and several community organizations and businesses. This is the central hub of the neighborhood which will continue to densify as mixed- use development occurs. This area is appropriate for the highest densities allowed in Urban Station Areas. This level of density must be balanced with improvements to the public realm including an expanded sidewalk, pedestrian-focused amenities, plazas, street lighting, and street trees. A high level of visual interest and design quality is needed to balance the increased density in the area and require street activating uses on the ground floor. Illustrated in Figure 2.4. BALLPARK CHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTIONS proposed future connections *Potential Public Space at Ballpark Proposed Bike Routes *Multi-Modal Access Proposed Crossings Festival Street Proposed Future TRAX with Possible Adjacent Trail TRAX Line *Pedestrian Connection Through Future Development *Dependent on owner agreement Green Space TRAX Line Bikeway Festival Street Connection through Future Development 1300 SOUTH 30 0 W E S T WE S T T E M P L E MA I N S T R E E T ST A T E S T R E E T 0 100 200 400FEET PAXTON AVE LUCY AVE 1400 SOUTH 1 2 A b c d FIGURE 2.7: CONNECTIVITY MAP RECOMMENDED CONNECTIONS IN THE “HEART” OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD Festival Street This street will allow temporary closure to vehicle traffic and host neighborhood and ballpark events. Proposed Bike Routes Several bike routes are in various stages of implementation through the heart of the neighborhood at the time of this document’s adoption. • The 300 West Reconstruction is funded and undergoing construction from 900 South to 2100 South with expected completion in 2022. • The existing designated bikeway on Main Street is undergoing an evaluation as part of the Salt Lake City Transportation Division’s Life on State Bikeway Implementation project. • The Paxton bikeway will connect State Street to 300 West. Multimodal Access This opportunity is recommended to connect the bikeway on Main Street to the TRAX Platform on Lucy Avenue. Pedestrian Connection Through Future Development This recommendation occurs in two locations: 1. This recommendation links the 1300 South station to the Ballpark and moves pedestrians through a private pedestrian-oriented development directly onto the proposed festival street on West Temple. 2. This recommendation connects West Temple to 300 West. This connection is dependent on a future agreement with UTA to provide a TRAX crossing on or near 1400 South. Potential for Future Public Space at Ballpark Additional public space through the addition of a ballpark perimeter trail, additional plazas, and activating public uses are recommended for this area. This recommendation would help connect the greater neighborhood to the Ballpark, but should not interfere with its daily operation and events. Proposed Crossings Additional crossings are recommended: a. directly east and west of the UTA crossings barriers on 1300 South. b. directly north of the 1300 South TRAX platform onto Lucy Avenue c. across the TRAX line at Paxton Avenue and the existing rail spur. d. An additional future crossing is recommended at or near 1400 South and should be evaluated for future opportunities in partnership with UTA. An enhanced crossing is also recommended at the intersection of 1300 South and West Temple. This crossing should show clear delineation, possibly through community art or a painted crossing. Proposed Future TRAX with Adjacent Trail This area is being evaluated by UTA for operating TRAX service with a possible adjacent trail. Opportunities for additional green spaces and greenery should be considered as this area is developed. 14 THE PLAN | GOALS, STRATEGIES & ACTIONS15 GOAL: Improve safety. Throughout the planning process safety was consistently identified as a current concern and goal for the future. This plan focuses on measures taken in the built environment to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety. STRATEGIES • Improve pedestrian experience and safety. ACTIONS: +Install pedestrian-level street lighting. +Require ground level uses in new buildings to incorporate pedestrian-level strategies. +Ensure adequate sidewalk width and park strips on primary walk routes, particularly around the TRAX station. +Improve ADA accessibility though sidewalk repair and removal of obstacles. +Ensure ongoing maintenance of all facilities to repair uneven sidewalks, functioning signals and frequent trash receptacles. • Identify and implement best practices in urban design to improve neighborhood safety, including: ACTIONS: +Identify opportunities for interaction, +Elimination of “blind corners” or areas, +Appropriate lighting for safety GOAL: Enhance social vibrancy. STRATEGIES • Support events and placemaking efforts including community art, pop-up events, and temporary food vendors. • Enhance greenspace in the neighborhood. ACTIONS: +Explore options for additional greenspace in the heart of the neighborhood in and around the Ballpark. +Evaluate the opportunity for future green space on the current Public Utilities site if and when Salt Lake Department of Public Utilities moves offices to a new location. +Enhance the urban tree canopy in underserved areas of the neighborhood and require additional street trees and urban greenery with new development. +Maintain all green spaces with: • Trash receptacles • Pedestrian lighting • Pedestrian furniture • Improve the quality of current and future greenspace. ACTIONS: +Ensure funding for additional maintenance and staffing as additional greenspace is added. GOAL: Increase affordability and attainability of housing for current and future residents. STRATEGIES • Provide a diversity of housing types and options for different incomes, familial status, age, and needs. ACTIONS: +Promote a diversity in the size of new units in the neighborhood to accommodate residents in different stages of life, including families with children. • Utilize the RDA State Street Project Area as a tool to capture reinvestment in the neighborhood and help encourage a diversity of housing types. • Increase opportunities for home ownership in the neighborhood. ACTIONS: +Explore alternative options for ownership strategies including land trusts and co-ops. +Provide down-payment assistance or other programs for qualifying residents • Mitigate the negative impacts of gentrification as development occurs. ACTIONS: +Continue to provide and market home repair programs for qualifying residents. +Provide education and renter legal assistance to help current renters stay in place. +Support development assistance and financing programs to maintain affordability. +Preserve existing social services and provide additional services as development occurs to support housing options and access to opportunity at a variety of income levels. proposed future connections *Potential Public Space at Ballpark Proposed Bike Routes *Multi-Modal Access Proposed Crossings Festival Street Proposed Future TRAX with Possible Adjacent Trail TRAX Line Proposed Future Alleyway Connections *Pedestrian Connection Through Future Development *Dependent on owner agreement Green Space TRAX Line Bikeway Festival Street Connection through Future Development proposed future connections *Potential Public Space at Ballpark Proposed Bike Routes *Multi-Modal Access Proposed Crossings Festival Street Proposed Future TRAX with Possible Adjacent Trail TRAX Line Proposed Future Alleyway Connections *Pedestrian Connection Through Future Development *Dependent on owner agreement Green Space TRAX Line Bikeway Festival Street Connection through Future Development 1700 SOUTH I-15 I-15 0 600 1,200300Feet 1300 SOUTH 30 0 W E S T WE S T T E M P L E MA I N S T R E E T ST A T E S T R E E T PAXTON AVE LUCY AVE 1400 SOUTH 900 SOUTH FIGURE 2.8: CONNECTIVITY MAP - REGIONAL CONTEXT THE PLAN | CONNECTIONS 16 RECOMMENDED PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES • Wide enough to provide 4 distinct zones: +THE EDGE ZONE separates the roadway from the sidewalk. +THE FURNISHINGS ZONE provides space for street furnishings and vertical elements such as trees, benches, etc. +THE THROUGHWAY ZONE provides a minimum of five – eight feet clear continuous pathway for ADA accessibility. +THE FRONTAGE ZONE provides a “shy distance” between the throughway zone and building frontage/property line and entrances. • ADA accessible • Street trees to provide a shaded pedestrian way • Human scaled building frontages • Pedestrian level street lighting • Store fronts, office windows, and windows on homes facing the street. • Encourage and allow outdoor retail displays while maintaining ADA compliant throughway zone. • Use of plazas, courtyards, and squares to provide pedestrian amenities. THE PLAN | FUTURE LAND USE17 FUTURE LAND USE MAP The Future Land Use Map (Figure 2.9) guides future development and land use decisions. This is a broad conceptual map. The map identifies areas for continuation of current land use, scale, and density and areas for transformation. 0 600 1,200300Feet 30 0 W E S T LUCY AVE PAXTON AVE 900 S ANDREWAVE 1700 S PARAMOUNT AVE ST A T E S T MA I N S T streetscape/festival street improvements opportunity for community space ballpark station public utilities site proposed future 1700 S TRAX station* kensington ave byway project 900 s station central ninth connectivity project FIGURE 2.9: FUTURE LAND USE MAP Site Boundary Future Land Use Concept Areas with Opportunity to Integrate Additional Green Space 300 West Transitional Area Heart of the Neighborhood / Ballpark Entertainment Zone Main Street Area State Street Corridor Neighborhood Areas Medium Density Transitional Area Central Ninth Corridor Area Community Recommended Future Public Space Incorporated into the Ballpark Medium Density Area Connections* Proposed Bike Routes Festival Street Pedestrian Connection Through Future Development Proposed Crossings Crossing Under Construction Proposed Future TRAX Line with Adjacent Trail UTA Station UTA Light Rail Gateway Areas Places of Interest Adopted Project Catalyst Area Community Recommended Catalyst Area Community Recommended Gateway Area Future Community Amenity 1/4 Mile Station Radius *DEPENDENT ON OWNER AGREEMENTS LEGEND Enhanced Crossing BALLPARK FUTURE LAND USE THE PLAN | FUTURE LAND USE 18 FUTURE LAND USE AREA DESCRIPTIONS Central Ninth Corridor Area This area is included in the Central Ninth chapter of the Downtown Master Plan. The corridor is experiencing new development and investment consistent with that plan. The Ballpark Station Area Plan assumes continued implementation of the Central Ninth chapter. The Central Ninth neighborhood should have direct connections to the Ballpark Station Area neighborhoods where possible. State Street Corridor This area presents opportunities to transform the State Street corridor into a mixed use, pedestrian, and bicycle friendly area through the introduction of a mix of uses, improvements to the bike and pedestrian environment and improved pedestrian crosswalks. Investments in east-west bicycle connections should be made to allow connectivity across State Street. 300 West Transitional Area The area between the TRAX lines and I-15 from 900 South to 1700 South was, until a few years ago, characterized by big box retail, auto-oriented services, storage, and flex space. The area is transitioning, primarily with new residential development. Medium to high density housing and office uses are appropriate in this area when balanced with sidewalk, connectivity, and other pedestrian improvements. As new households are added to the area, amenities, and services to support residents will create a mixed-use space and are needed to maintain quality of life and reduce reliance on automobile travel. The 300 West Reconstruction will improve multi-modal opportunities along 300 West and will encourage growth in the area. Opportunities to add pedestrian friendly retail and services as well as connect the 300 West area to the rest of the “Heart” of the neighborhood east of the TRAX line should be identified. These mixed-use areas should maintain a high-quality pedestrian environment to connect residents, businesses, and services. The character of long-standing local businesses should be considered for pedestrians as new development occurs to acknowledge the history of the area. Medium Density Transitional Area The area between the TRAX lines and West Temple south of 1400 South, which includes the current Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities site, is appropriate for redevelopment into medium density uses. The area is characterized by a mix of housing and commercial uses that back to the TRAX line. Redevelopment of this area should include medium density housing and commercial buildings with reduced height along the West Temple frontage adjacent to the neighborhood character area. The area also includes the Public Utilities Department offices and yard which is identified as a potential future catalytic area for community uses and open space to help support the existing neighborhood and potential future mid-density development. Neighborhood Areas The primarily single-family neighborhood south of 1300 South was “down-zoned” to preserve the housing stock, street grid pattern, and neighborhood. The scale and density of this area should be maintained with targeted redevelopment of vacant abandoned structures with new or rehabilitated structures at a comparable scale and character as the existing housing stock. Appropriate buffers between existing single-family areas and future higher-density uses should be maintained. The system of publicly-owned alleyways through the neighborhood character areas should be evaluated for improvement to enhance overall connectivity in the area. Main Street Area Main Street is an alternative to the heavy auto-traveled State Street to the east. Main Street from 900 to 1700 South is lower and slower than State Street making it a better pedestrian and biking environment. Main Street between 900 and 1300 South has developed into larger format commercial uses including car dealerships. Redevelopment of the automobile dealerships in this area is not likely in the next 5-10 years. Available parcels between State Street and Richards Street between 900 and 1300 South should be considered for redevelopment into a mix of market-rate and affordable housing at densities comparable to those on State Street at a scale comparable to the surrounding area. Main Street at 1300 South is part of the Heart of the Neighborhood identified for transit supportive densities. As redevelopment of this section of Main Street occurs the viewshed of the Wasatch Range from inside of the Ballpark should be preserved by limiting the position and heights of buildings. Main Street between the current Utah Pride Center (1380 S. Main Street) and 1700 South has retained its original scale and includes several locally owned restaurants, bakeries, and shops. The east side of Main Street is included in the State Street overlay zone which addresses the scale and placement of buildings in the area. To ensure compatible development on both sides of Main Street the overlay zone should be extended to include the properties on the west side of Main Street. The area between Major Street and the recently down-zoned residential area should be considered for redevelopment into a medium density area that utilizes current building scale and massing to guide future development. New buildings in the area should be considered for redevelopment at a scale comparable to the surrounding area with front doors on Main Street, stoops, and yards. The Heart of the Neighborhood / Ballpark Station Entertainment Zone The area between just north of Paxton Avenue on the north and 1400 South on the south, Main Street on the east and 400 West on the west is the Heart of the Ballpark Neighborhood. This area includes Smith’s Ballpark, the Ballpark TRAX station, and several businesses and community organizations. This area is appropriate for Transit Station Area District Zoning as an Urban Station. The area is appropriate for higher densities. There are significant redevelopment opportunities in this area to enhance gameday and non-gameday activities in the area. In addition to the Ballpark and the station, the area already boasts some of the most popular local restaurants in the city. Building on this success there is an opportunity to create a vibrant entertainment zone centered on the Ballpark and serving the surrounding neighborhood as a community hub. This area could also be considered for the addition of a public service anchor such as a library with opportunity for public space. This area can support the highest intensity of use because of the transportation grid and available transit. It is recommended that streetscape elements should include additional art and interpretive historical elements, shaded pedestrian way, and visual elements directly related to the Ballpark. Community Recommended Future Public Space at the Ballpark This area is identified by the community as having opportunity for future public space around the Ballpark facility to create year-round activation. Some examples include additional plaza space, perimeter trail or other green space. This will help activate the area but should not interfere with game day and day-to-day operations. Adopted Catalytic Areas These are areas of planned and adopted new investment that have been approved and are awaiting implementation. KENSINGTON AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD BYWAY PROJECT Kensington Avenue Byway Improvements including bicycle and pedestrian crossing improvements, traffic calming, wayfinding signage, and connectivity enhancements to existing bicycle and pedestrian routes. CENTRAL NINTH CATALYTIC CONNECTIVITY The Downtown Plan recommends several improvements to this area. Phase I underpass improvements include amenities on both sides of the 900 South viaduct such as public art, pedestrian lighting, street tress, and other comfort amenities. The Downtown Plan also proposes a Central Ninth Catalytic Connectivity Phase II TRAX extension which would run from 400 West to 900 South with adjacent active transportation trail if approved, as well as a Central Ninth Catalytic Connectivity Long Term 900 South viaduct demolition and shortening which would occur at the end of the viaduct’s structural life and be replaced with community amenities and new connections. THE PLAN | FUTURE LAND USE19 Community Recommended Catalytic Areas These are areas of planned or potential new investment that can leverage transformative private investment, improve neighborhood livability, and create a new, vibrant Ballpark District. BALLPARK ENTERTAINMENT/STATION AREA IMPROVEMENTS The Ballpark is an anchor for both gameday and non-gameday improvements and activities. Ballparks around the country have increasingly become the centerpiece for broader entertainment areas including restaurants, bars, theaters, plazas, and community gathering spaces. Smith’s Ballpark is located in a neighborhood that already offers many of these amenities. There are also vacant and underutilized parcels around the Ballpark that can be redeveloped into housing, offices, stores, and restaurants to add vibrancy. The existing public realm can be rethought to provide opportunities for community activities. Opportunities include: • Transit supportive development in the existing Ballpark TRAX Station parking lot • High-density mixed-use development in the City-owned parking lot north of the Ballpark • Redevelopment of the area west of the Ballpark into a high-density mixed-use concept with pedestrian-oriented features and amenities • Improvement of the pedestrian areas along 1300 South to address capacity and safety issues • Creation of a Festival Street on West Temple that can be closed to traffic for special events including community farmers market, concerts, etc. • Improved “permeability” of the Ballpark to allow non-gameday access to the team store and possibly ground level restaurants • Expansion of the Ballpark plaza to extend to the south and east to maximize special event and gameday activity areas. • Develop a transit supportive zone for this area that includes maximum height requirements to allow roof top decks with a view of the mountains and ballpark and minimum height requirements to create an urban experience for residents and visitors. • Addition of an anchoring community amenity which may include options like a library with opportunities for public space. Transit station upgrades in this area may include: • Pedestrian crossings directly to the east and west of the UTA crossing barriers, and to the north and south of 1300 South. • Elimination of the bus drop off loop • Station-adjacent transit-supportive development of the UTA surface parking lot and to the west of the station and improve overall performance of the station in the neighborhood. • Pedestrian/bikeways improvements to access the Ballpark Station. PUBLIC UTILITIES SITE The Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities is located at 1530 South West Temple. The Public Utilities offices and yards may relocate at some point in the future. If Salt Lake City makes an operational change, the current Public Utilities site would be a good location to add much needed community amenities to the neighborhood. Possible future uses include: • Expanded park space to supplement the “Ballpark Playground” currently on the site • Relocation of Fire Station #8 from next to the Ballpark, and reuse of the existing fire station location for an activating use with frontage consistent with a walkable and comfortable public space • A community center to provide community meeting and education space, and/or recreation facilities. COMMUNITY RECOMMENDED 1700 SOUTH TRANSIT HUB Long-range transportation plans recommend a future transit hub at 1700 South serving light rail and east-west bus service. This area should adopt an “urban form” including extensive “last mile” connections to surrounding neighborhoods and uses, and implementation of appropriate Transit Supportive Zoning. Community Recommended Gateways These are areas recommended by the community to announce arrival into the Ballpark neighborhood. Future Community Amenity Proposed locations for community amenities which may include opportunity for parks, libraries, and supportive services. Ballpark TRAX Station / GSBS Consulting THE PLAN | KEY STRATEGIES & PROJECTS CONNECTIVITY STRATEGIES Enhancing the pedestrian environment is a priority for the Ballpark Neighborhood. The ability to efficiently and comfortably access the area will benefit residents, current and future businesses, and will improve both gameday and non-gameday experiences for visitors. Movement throughout the neighborhood can be enhanced by the widening of sidewalks and pedestrian space and the enhancement of these public spaces to include street furniture, street trees and plants, and additional pedestrian-level street lighting. The pedestrian environment should be suitable and safe for all ages and abilities to ensure equitable access. This includes the improvement of existing street crossings to elevate the visibility of pedestrians and the addition of new street crossings where current options are limited. Figure 2.10 depicts the existing street sections for 1300 South. This plan recommends an updated street profile to improve walkability within the heart of the neighborhood. Figure 2.11 shows the recommended profile for 1300 South, which includes five feet of pedestrian space within a private encroachment to occur as properties redevelop, five feet of pedestrian space with street trees and pedestrian level lighting, and a center median. Recommendations for a safer bike and pedestrian network include: • Fill gaps in the sidewalk network and increase sidewalk width and buffers, prioritizing 1300 South, 300 West, 900 South, and 1700 South. The combined public sidewalk and private encroachment should have a minimum width of ten feet to allow for street trees and street lighting. • Provide and maintain pedestrian amenities including street furniture and trash receptacles • Improve bike lane marking, especially at major intersections • Enhance pedestrian-level lighting and prioritize underserved areas • Support pedestrian-level street activation including food, retail and entertainment options • Enhance existing crossings to prioritize pedestrians • Support mid-block crossings and alleyways to improve connectivity CONNECTIVITY There are several opportunities to enhance connectivity and improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the neighborhood. Navigating the Ballpark Neighborhood by foot and bicycle is supported by the surrounding grid system which historically provided easy connectivity in the area. Preserving connections and enhancing and adding new midblock connections will help people move throughout the neighborhood and provide alternatives to navigating along high-volume arterials. Figure 2.8 on page 16 identifies several recommended connections to navigate through the neighborhood. In addition to improved connectivity, additional upgrades to bike and pedestrian facilities are recommended. These include: • Upgraded bike parking facilities that are highly visible to decrease the risk of theft and provide a secure area to lock onto • Traffic signaling which recognizes the presence of bicycles along designated bikeways • Delineated or raised pedestrian crossings with crossing islands on high volume roads PARKING STRATEGY Parking needs in the Ballpark Neighborhood vary between game days and non-game days. On game days, landowners adjacent to the Ballpark provide paid parking, and several on-street parking options are available on a first-come-first-serve basis. However, on non-game days the surrounding properties sit as vacant lots and lack activating uses. Optimizing a balance of parking for year-round activation helps create a pedestrian environment with opportunity for different land use strategies. Future considerations for parking in the heart of the neighborhood include: • Reduce overall parking requirements through a shared parking system between different uses • Identify surrounding businesses as potential partners in a shared parking agreement for game day events • Increase bicycle parking options surrounding the Ballpark and at the Ballpark. • Allow developers to substitute a predetermined percentage of automobile parking for bicycle parking • Evaluate the need for a parking garage serving the 1300 South area as development occurs • Include standards for parking garages and their interaction with the neighborhood in the Transit Supportive Zone • Provide free transit access with Ballpark ticket sales • Encourage subsidization of transit passes by businesses for employees and residents. ALLEYWAY SAFETY Designated alleyways can provide connectivity options for pedestrians and bicyclists as they move throughout the Station Area. Maintaining a high level of perceived safety is important to the activation and success of these alternate routes and can be achieved by considering several activating urban design strategies to improve the health and quality of these public spaces. Tactics for creating safe and well-used alleyways include: • Enhance alleyway identity by naming designated alleyways. • Implement new paving, materials, and colors to indicate well caredfor places. • Maintain the alleyways and provide space for art and activities to show that they are cared for. • Provide frequent and lowglare pedestrian level lightning. Private Encroach. Private Encroach.Sdwlk Sdwlk 2. 5 ’ C u r b / G u t t e r 2. 5 ’ C u r b / G u t t e r 71.5’ 71.5’ Existing Proposed 2. 5 ’ C u r b / G u t t e r 2. 5 ’ C u r b / G u t t e r Sdwlk SdwlkCenter Median Center Lane (TWLTL) Lane Lane Lane Lane Lane Lane Lane Lane 5’5’5’ 5’5’ 5’11’ 11’ 11’ 11’ 11’ 11’ 11.5’ 11.5’ 12’ 12’ FIGURE 2.10: EXISTING 1300 SOUTH STREET SECTION FOR THE HEART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD Private Encroach.Private Encroach.Sdwlk Sdwlk 2. 5 ’ C u r b / G u t t e r 2. 5 ’ C u r b / G u t t e r 71.5’ 71.5’ Existing Proposed 2. 5 ’ C u r b / G u t t e r 2. 5 ’ C u r b / G u t t e r Sdwlk SdwlkCenter Median Center Lane (TWLTL) Lane Lane Lane Lane Lane Lane Lane Lane 5’5’5’ 5’5’ 5’11’ 11’ 11’ 11’ 11’ 11’ 11.5’ 11.5’ 12’ 12’ FIGURE 2.11: PROPOSED 1300 SOUTH STREET SECTION FOR THE HEART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD 20 STREET LIGHTING Pedestrian-level street lighting is key to making a place feel comfortable and safe for people navigating the neighborhood by foot and bicycle. The Salt Lake City Street Lighting Master Plan identifies the Ballpark neighborhood as a high priority area for future street lighting because it is currently underserved and has several high potential conflict areas and schools. In addition to requiring new street lighting with new development, the neighborhood can request enhanced pedestrian-level street lighting through a process coordinated with the Salt Lake Department of Public Utilities by: 1. Submitting an initial request though the community council to Public Utilities for additional street lighting with specific locations and reasons. 2. Reviewing the surrounding street and land use character with Public Utilities to determine appropriate lighting type 3. Gather a cost estimate for the additional lighting and seek funding approval in partnership with the department. 4. Design, schedule and implement preferred option in partnership with the department. • Add plants and greenery, like green walls, to provide public green space while maintaining a level of transparency from private lots into the alleyway. • Embrace alleyways as part of the city network rather than “backside” spaces hidden from sight. SAFETY & SECURITY Safety is a priority to the Ballpark community. While this plan does not directly address crime, there are measures that can be integrated into the physical elements of the neighborhood to improve perceived safety. Appropriate Lighting Appropriate pedestrian level lighting should directly light the pedestrian-way at a height that maintains a pedestrian-scaled walkway. It is recommended that future development include pedestrian-scale lighting with a priority on underserved areas, street crossings, and transit stops. A definition of priority areas can be found in the Salt Lake City Street Lighting Masterplan. Appropriate pedestrian lighting should: • Be pedestrian scaled • Have a lighting pole height of 13-16 feet • Maintain color accuracy • Be coordinated according to surrounding land use and context This lighting option has significant glare and prioritizes the vehicle right of way, creating visibility and perceived safety issues. (Source: SLC Street Lighting Masterplan) Lights with low glare provide more comfortable streets and public spaces, providing light where it is needed without annoying nearby residents. Source: (SLC Street Lighting Master Plan) THE PLAN | KEY STRATEGIES & PROJECTS21 Transparent Building Fronts and Visibility Aside from adding visual interest to a street, transparent building fronts increase the number of ”eyes on the street” by allowing people inside buildings to have direct view of what is happening outside. This increased interaction between the inside and outside decreases the likelihood for crime in these areas, especially when well lit. Landscaping and Visibility Visually permeable landscaping provides another opportunity to improve the perceived safety of an area. Tall, view-obstructing fences and landscaping inhibit visibility of what is happening in an area. Areas with little visibility often experience criminal activity which can be hidden behind visual barriers. Prioritizing good visibility, especially in and around public spaces, inhibits the ability to conduct crime out of sight. ENHANCING NEIGHBORHOOD GREENSPACE The station area is served by two parks, Jefferson Park and the Ballpark Playground. Jefferson Park includes a playground and a multi-use field, and also acts as a stormwater retention area for the City. Jefferson Park is maintained by the City and offers 3 acres of green space. The Ballpark Playground, which was recently renamed from Peoples Freeway Park in 2020, is 0.4 acres and is maintained by the Salt Lake Department of Public Utilities. The Salt Lake City Parks & Public Lands Needs Assessment identifies the neighborhood as an area of greater need for green space. This area is likely to receive much of the City’s future growth, yet has the lowest level of service for parks in the city at 2.8 park acres per 1,000 population compared to a city-wide level of service of 3.5 city-owned and managed park acres per 1,000 population. This Plan’s recommendations for future opportunities for green space, identified in the Future Land Use Map, include the area just south of the 900 South freeway access ramp and the current Public Utilities site. As the Public Utilities department outgrows this location, the site should be evaluated for additional community green space. The proposed festival street, identified on the Future Land Use Map, should also incorporate green landscaping elements such as planters, street trees and landscaped areas. This example of Regent Street shows transparency between the street and inside the adjacent building help increase the perceived safety of an area. THE PLAN | KEY STRATEGIES & PROJECTS 22 The Ballpark Playground provides a greenspace oasis within the neighborhood The Salt Lake City Parks & Public Lands Needs Assessment identifies ten “big ideas” for the future of green space in the City, shown in figure 2.12. These ideas were developed through an extensive community outreach effort to identify what residents want to see in the future city-wide green space. Another opportunity for additional greenspace arises in future development of the neighborhood. This plan recommends that the City require additional green space as a requirement for new private development outlined in the recommended Transit Supportive Zoning for the heart of the neighborhood. New development should incorporate “green” features including additional street trees, planted medians and park strips, and strategic landscaping to provide pinpricks for greenery throughout the neighborhood. Drought resistant landscaping is recommended to support the city’s overall goal of creating an urban ecosystem the integrates parks, plazas and the urban forestry identified in the Downtown Plan. Creating successful public open space in the neighborhood can be achieved through several urban design recommendations. These include: • Treating public space as an object to work towards rather than “leftover space” • Integrating public space into community facilities like schools, libraries, and service centers • Lining public spaces with public uses to improve safety and accessibility • Considering the design of adjacent streets and their use of bulb outs, furniture, paving, and improvements to create a pleasant and desirable place • Creating pedestrian and bicycle routes which serve both transportation and recreational purposes. HOUSING OPPORTUNITY & MITIGATING DISPLACEMENT The Ballpark’s identity as an affordable area is quickly changing. While there are strong residential pockets within the neighborhood, a majority of new residential development has been mid-rise apartment style rental units. The community has identified three priorities to assist current and future residents in finding attainable and affordable housing regardless of their income, age, familial status, and background. These priorities include: • Providing clean, safe, and equitable housing options for all residents. • Providing opportunities for home ownership for a diversity of income levels • Mitigating the negative effects of gentrification as development occurs Anti-Displacement Strategies As this area continues to grow and change, households that spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing are at a greater risk for getting priced out of the neighborhood and being involuntarily displaced. The city is required by the state and WFRC to submit an annual report which highlights an estimate of moderate-income housing needs and review moderate income housing implementation progress outlined in Growing SLC, Salt Lake’s 5-year housing plan. In addition, at the time of writing, the City is conducting a Gentrification Assessment & Displacement Mitigation Study, which will include models of current and future gentrification pressures and provide recommendations to avoid involuntary displacement. Recommendations from that study should be followed in the Ballpark neighborhood as applicable. FUTURE PUBLIC SPACE SHOULD: 1. INCLUDE A WAYFINDING AND SIGNAGE CAMPAIGN THAT MAKES IT EASIER TO EXPLORE NEARBY PARKS, TRAILS AND PUBLIC SPACES 2. COMPLETE MISSING LINKS IN REGIONAL TRAILS AND INVEST IN GREENWAYS TO ENHANCE NATURE And CREEKS WITHIN THE CITY 3. TRANSFORM PARKS INTO VIBRANT COMMUNITY SPACES THAT EMPOWER RESIDENTS TO CONTRIBUTE TO THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITY 4. HELP OUR PARKS, LARGE AND SMALL, COME ALIVE WITH ACTIVITIES AND EVENTS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR 5. INVEST IN PROJECTS AND MAINTENANCE ALONG THE JORDAN RIVER PARKWAY THAT WILL PROMOTE EQUITY, ACCESS, SCENIC BEAUTY, DIVERSE RECREATION, AND HEALTHY ECOLOGY ALONG THE PARKWAY 6. REVEAL PAST AND PRESENT STORIES FROM OUR DIVERSITY OF EXPERIENCES THAT HAVE SHAPED THIS VALLEY, GIVING FOCUS TO UNDERREPRESENTED AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLE. EXPRESS THESE STORIES THROUGH LANDSCAPES, STRUCTURE, AND PLACEMAKING 7. INCREASE THE PROVISION OF GREEN AND ACTIVE SPACES DOWNTOWN THAT WILL CONTRIBUTE TO LIVABILITY AND ECONOMIC VITALITY 8. BUILD PUBLIC AWARENESS TO SUPPORT NEW TREES STEWARDSHIP THAT ALLOWS URBAN FORESTRY TO PLANT TREES IN ALL PUBLICLYOWNED LANDSCAPES 9. INVITE APPROPRIATE ALTERNATIVE USE OF OUR PUBLIC GOLFCOURSES FOR GREATER BENEFIT 10. CULTIVATE MORE BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN PARKS AND NATURAL AREAS Source: Salt Lake City Public Lands TEN “BIG IDEAS” FOR THE FUTURE OF GREEN SPACE IN SLC FIGURE 2.12: TEN “BIG IDEAS” FOR THE FUTURE OF GREEN SPACE IN SLC THE PLAN | KEY STRATEGIES & PROJECTS23 To reduce the negative impact of gentrification in the primarily renter occupied neighborhood, the city should work with local organizations and services to provide legal support, education, and outreach to residents. Existing community-based organizations can provide tenant services and homeowner assistance to support residents. Educating the community is an immediate step to mitigate displacement and includes education on tenants’ rights, understanding lease agreements, financial literacy, the risks of predation on vulnerable homeowners, and relocation assistance to help stabilize changing housing situations. The city should also support development assistance and financing to offer technical assistance to help low-income renters and owners in the area to identify increased rental opportunities for ADUs and financing strategies. Since the neighborhood is also home to a large number of the city’s unhoused residents, prioritizing the retention of outreach social services and case managers to help support the existing unhoused population in the neighborhood will likely improve health and safety outcomes for all residents. In addition, the equitable distribution of social services, case managers and housing options for individuals making under 30 percent of the area median income should be coordinated on a county-wide/regional level. Figure 2.13 shows a map of existing services and nonprofit organizations which provide support to much of Salt Lake County. Focus should be placed on connecting these county-wide services with improved public transit to improve overall access. 0 600 1,200300Feet TE E R T S E T A T S 900 SOUTH 1700 SOUTH VOA Detox Center Palmer Court Permanent Supportive Housing Fresh Start Behavioral Health UTAH DEPARTMENT oF CORRECTIONS ADULT PROHBATION AND PAROLE URBAN INDIAN CENTER OF SALT LAKE THE ROAD HOME HOUSING AND SERVICES GAIL MILLER RESOURCE CENTER UTAH PRIDE CENTER FIGURE 2.13: COMMUNITY SERVICES AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS MAP HOUSING RESOURCES AND OPPORTUNITIES Condo-Based Community Land TrustHow it works: This program allows development of owner-occupied condos on appropriate private and public owned land through an ongoing lease. This reduces the purchase price of each unit and requires resale at an affordable price with a limit to appreciation to maintain affordability. Examples of where this has worked: Burlington, VT, Austin TX, Oakland, CA Target Outcomes: Increases opportunity for ownership, increases affordability SLC Home Repair ProgramHow it works: The program allows owner-occupied households with moderate income to obtain either a no interest loan or a low interest loan to address health, safety and structural issues in their homes. https://www.slc.gov/hand/city-housing-programs/home-repair-program/ SLC Targeted Repair ProgramHow it works: Very Low-Income households (50% and below AMI) can apply for a lifetime maximum grant of up to $50,000 to repair major structural and/or mechanical component deficiencies in their home. This grant will allow homeowners, who have no other funding options, access the funds needed to keep their homes accessible, habitable and safe. https://www.slc.gov/hand/city-housing-programs/salt-lake-city-hand-targeted-repair-program/ THE PLAN | KEY STRATEGIES & PROJECTS 24 COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS PLANNING PROCESS The planning process began by working with the community to establish an understanding of current and planned assets and challenges in the neighborhood, followed by the study of transformational changes that can be made to enhance livability and opportunities in the area. At each step in the planning process, the ideas, information, and recommendation were reviewed and improved by the community through online and in-person outreach. The process began with an analysis of existing conditions that identified: • Current and projected population, employment, and other development in the area • Current and projected socio-economic factors • Current and planned transportation, transit, and multi-modal infrastructure • Prior plans and initiatives • Planned Ballpark improvements In addition to analysis of existing conditions the plan includes the findings of a Ballpark Area Case Study analysis and an economic Highest and Best Use Analysis. Those complete reports can be found in the appendices. Community Exploration & Analysis 25 Neighborhood playground in at Jefferson Park / GSBS Consulting COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS STUDY AREA The Ballpark neighborhood in Salt Lake City is directly south of downtown and has, over its history, transitioned from a first ring suburb characterized by single family residential development to a downtown support area characterized by industrial, distribution and similar uses to the southern boundary of Salt Lake City’s downtown with bars and restaurants. The neighborhood retains evidence of all these roles resulting in an eclectic and diverse mix of land uses. The study area for this plan does not include the entire Ballpark Community Council area. The southern boundary of the study area is 1700 South. The Ballpark neighborhood is characterized by a mix of uses near downtown Salt Lake and is easily accessible via TRAX light rail and major transportation corridors including I-15 and I-80, Figure 3.1. One of the key benefits identified by residents of the neighborhood is proximity to downtown. However, the transportation corridors also pose barriers to connectivity within the neighborhood. The presence of both I-15 and the UTA light rail lines inhibit east-west movement by acting as physical barriers and posing several safety issues for pedestrians and bicyclists navigating the area. 0 1.5 30.75 Miles I-15 I-80 I-15 Site Area Highways Roads City Boundary FIGURE 3.1: BALLPARK REGIONAL CONTEXT MAP Smith’s Ballpark / GSBS Consulting 26 COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS27 Demographics Ballpark neighborhood households are: • smaller, • younger, and • more likely to rent than households in the rest of Salt Lake City, the County, and the State of Utah. There are an estimated 4,131 people living in 1,854 households within the study area boundaries. WFRC projects an increase to approximately 10,021 people by 2040. At current household sizes this is an additional 1,100 dwelling units in the next 20 years. Based on availability of developable land and the mix of land uses, actual growth could be even higher. Ballpark residents have a median age of 32.6 years with a larger population of young children (0 – 14) compared to Salt Lake City. However, study area has a smaller portion of the population ages 15 – 25, as well as elderly population (65+). The Ballpark area is diverse, with some similarities to Salt Lake City, with a greater percentage of Caucasian population, and those residents who identified as Some Other Race. The study area is also home to a high percentage of Hispanic residents, Table 3.1. The diverse population in the Ballpark area can prove to be an asset in terms of employment, as oftentimes employers will seek a diverse workforce to fill roles. Having a diverse population and skills available to employers can be leveraged as an asset for the community. To further understand the diversity of the Ballpark area, an analysis of Simpson’s Diversity Index was conducted to measure the diversity of a population in which members belong to a unique group. The analysis measures the racial and ethnic homogeneity of an area. The Ballpark area has Diversity Index scores of 0.38 and 0.34, respectively. Compared to the other block groups in vicinity of the study area, the Ballpark area has a higher level of diversity. This also means that while there aren’t large ratios of diverse populations in the study area, there are a high number of unique races and ethnicities within the community. An analysis of spoken languages was conducted and shows an increased level of languages spoken throughout the study area compared to Salt Lake City . Data provided by Liberty and Whittier Elementary, which includes languages of families, indicate that the majority of alternate languages spoken in the schools in the area include Spanish, Arabic, Burmese, Karen, Somali. The average size of households in the study area is significantly smaller at 2.2 people per household compared to the average household size of 3.13 observed throughout Salt Lake City and Utah. The Ballpark study area consists primarily of renter-occupied housing (78.6%) much higher than in surrounding multiplicities, Salt Lake County and in Utah, Table 3.2. More information on housing in Salt Lake City can be found in the Moderate Income Housing Plan. As shown in Table 3.3, the incomes within the study area are significantly lower than the incomes throughout Salt Lake City or the state of Utah. According to the 2019 U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year estimates, over 32 percent of households in the study area make less than $15,000 annually. In contrast, only 6.3 percent of households throughout the state earn less than $15,000. A large portion (22 percent) of households within the study area make between $50,000 and $75,000 annually, but only 12 percent of total households make more than $75,000. Race Ballpark station Area %Salt Lake City % Caucasian 72.6%70.9% African American 2.4%3.5% American Indian & Alaska Native 0.0%1.3% Asian 4.6%6.2% Native Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islander 0.6%2.1% Some Other Race 18.2%11.7% Two or More Races 1.5%4.3% TOTAL 99.9%100.0% Ethnicity Hispanic Origin 22.2%24.0% Source: 2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, ESRI Ballpark station Area Salt Lake City Salt Lake County Utah Total Households 1,854 82,259 397,918 1,050,542 Owner Households 15.3%41.3%61.8%63.1% Renter Households 78.6%51.7%33.2%27.0% Vacant Households 6.1%7.0%5.0%9.9% Families 768 41,258 277,473 781,973 Household Size 2.20 2.41 2.99 3.13 Source: 2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, ESRI Ballpark station Area Salt Lake County Salt Lake MSA Utah Median Household Income $26,047 $76,410 $76,256 $73,015 Average Household Income $44,498 $99,988 $99,114 $92,612 Per Capita Income $19,992 $33,095 $32,666 $29,227 Source: 2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, ESRI TABLE 3.1 RACE AND ETHNICITY IN THE BALLPARK STATION AREA AND SALT LAKE CITY TABLE 3.2: OWNERSHIP AND RENTERSHIP RATES IN THE BALLPARK STATION AREA AND SURROUNDING REGION TABLE 3.3: INCOME IN THE BALLPARK STATION AREA AND SURROUNDING REGION SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Prior Planning Efforts Several plans have been completed on areas adjacent too or within the Ballpark Neighborhood over the past decade. Many of the recommendations from these prior plans are incorporated into this Station Area Plan. Existing Plans for the Area Include: Adopted City Plans: • Downtown Master Plan / Central 9th • Central Community Plan • State Street Reinvestment Plan • Growing SLC • Plan Salt Lake • Salt Lake City Street Lighting Master Plan (undergoing adoption) Not Adopted: • Life on State 2010 • Life on State Implementation • Student Ballpark Master Plan Project • Homeless Resource Centers Neighborhood Action Strategies • Salt Lake City Parks & Public Lands Needs Assessment CENTRAL COMMUNITY PLAN – 2005 The most recent official plan for the Ballpark Neighborhood is the Central Community Plan adopted in 2005. The plan identified goals, strategies, and future land use for each of the neighborhoods within the Central Community Planning District. The plan identified four fundamental goals for the Central Community: • Livable communities and neighborhoods • Vital and sustainable commerce • Unique and active places • Pedestrian mobility and accessibility LIFE ON STATE - 2010 Life on State is a multi-jurisdictional vision document sponsored by Wasatch Front Regional Council that identified several goals for State Street/Highway 89 as it passes through the Salt Lake Valley. LIFE ON STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - 2018 In April 2018, Salt Lake City and South Salt Lake City completed a Life on State Implementation Plan that built on the vision and goals of the Life on State Vision plan to identify the specific elements and strategies to transform State Street to a “Signature Street.” DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN/CENTRAL NINTH NEIGHBORHOOD - 2016 The Central Ninth neighborhood immediately to the north of the Ballpark Neighborhood is part of the Downtown Planning District. The Downtown Master Plan identified a catalytic project to connect the Central Ninth Neighborhood to the Ballpark Neighborhood through the area occupied by the I-15 900 South viaduct, Figure 3.2. This initiative identifies improvement of existing underpasses to enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and experience, improve unused right-of-way for community greenspace, and eventually remove the viaduct to add community space to the neighborhood. HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTERS NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION STRATEGIES – 2020 Salt Lake City completed a plan to assess the impacts of two new Homeless Resource Centers in the Central Community. The Gail Miller Homeless Resource Center is located within the study area and provides beds for 200 unhoused men and women. The Geraldine King Resource Center is located two blocks north of the study area and provides beds for 200 unhoused women. The plan identified the following key strategies: 1. Commit to long-term investments in the physical and social infrastructure in neighborhoods around the new homeless resource centers. 2. Lead efforts to secure funding support from other non-City sources for investments in HRC neighborhoods. 3. Prioritize and fast-track planned City projects in the Capital Facilities Plan in neighborhoods supporting the HRC facilities. 4. Foster community driven efforts to improve quality of life in neighborhoods near resource centers. 126 STORY FROM TOMORROW the 900 south Viaduct separates the central Ninth neighborhood and the Ballpark neighborhood to the south. The two neighborhoods should be better connected to provide both neighborhoods with housing options, access to open space, and provide opportunities to walk to transit, shops, dining, etc. The connections could be improved by addressing the West temple and 900 south viaduct. as the viaduct ages and comes closer to the end of its structural life, city hall should work with area residents and business owners, uDot, and uta (who owns the abandoned rail corridor that passes under the viaduct) to study alternatives that improves the connectivity between the neighborhoods. Improving underpasses and adding amenities on both sides of the viaduct will help improve the connectivity and desirability of both neighborhoods. This may include the addition of public art, pedestrian lighting, street trees, and other pedestrian comfort amenities along the north-south streets. cATALYTIc pROjecT: cOnnecTIng cenTRAL nInTh TO bALLpARK 900 S 800 S 1300 S 30 0 W 20 0 W W T E M P L E REIMAGINE UNDERPASSLIGHTING REIMAGINE UNDERPASSLIGHTING CREATE GATEWAYGARDEN SMITHBALL PARK SOFTEN HIGHWAYEDGES CONNECT TO 9LINE SOFTEN HIGHWAYEDGES Source: Salt Lake City Downtown Masterplan FIGURE 3.2: CATALYTIC PROJECT: CONNECTING CENTRAL NINTH TO BALLPARK COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS | EXISTING CONDITIONS 28 COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS | EXISTING CONDITIONS29 The plan also identified near-, mid-, and long-term projects in the neighborhoods surrounding each of the HRCs in the Central Community to help mitigate the impacts of the centers. Many of the projects identified are City-wide projects such as improvements to transit access and housing policies and investments. The infrastructure improvement projects identified for the Ballpark Neighborhood, within ½ mile of the Gail Miller HRC include: • Near Term +300 West rebuild and ADA-accessibility improvements +Construction of a pedestrian crossing on 1300 to the Ballpark TRAX +Main Street Cycle Track +Street Lighting updates +Greenbike station at Ballpark TRAX Station • Mid Term +Construction of a neighborhood byway • Long Term +Multi-modal transportation improvements on State Street +Protected bike lanes on 300 West, 1700 South, 200 West, and West Temple +Improved bus facilities STATE STREET PROJECT AREA PLAN– 2019 The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City created the State Street Project Area Plan to further the economic development goals of the City and community, including land use and connectivity. The Plan includes the Ballpark Station Area Planning boundaries with the exception of a “carve out” for the Ballpark property and the City- owned parking lot to the north, incorporates the community vision and land use plans established by the Downtown Master Plan and the Central Community Master Plan, and provides funding and investment tools to help leverage private investment in the neighborhood. As seen in Figure 3.3, the project area extends along State Street from 300 South on the north to 2100 South on the south. FIGURE 3.3: STATE STREET PROJECT AREA MAP SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC LANDS NEEDS ASSESSMENT - 2019 In 2019 the city identified existing natural lands needs for urban and non-urban areas of Salt Lake City. The plan identifies level of service for the city’s seven planning areas and identifies community goals for the Parks & Public lands system as it grows. SALT LAKE CITY GENTRIFICATION ASSESSMENT AND DISPLACEMENT MITIGATION PLAN (EXPECTED COMPLETION 2022) A plan to assess gentrification pressures and risk of involuntary displacement in Salt Lake City’s neighborhoods is expected to be completed in 2022. The effort will involve extensive community engagement, address inequities in the community, and provide recommendations for programs, policies and strategies to help residents stay in place and benefit from neighborhood investments. SALT LAKE CITY STREET LIGHTING MASTER PLAN (MOVING THROUGH ADOPTION PROCESS) The Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities created a Street Lighting Master Plan to identify areas of high priority for additional street lighting through out the city and to define proper placement and light levels for all city street lighting. The Street Lighting Master Plan The Master Plan archives all existing light poles and provides design and placement recommendations according to surrounding land use and ecological health. GROWING SALT LAKE CITY – A FIVE YEAR HOUSING PLAN Growing Salt Lake City is a five-year housing plan for the city from 2018 to 2022 and was published in January 2018 by the Department of Community and Neighborhoods. The Plan contains several topics including updates to zoning code, preservation of affordable housing, and equitability, fair housing, and transportation. Another key point of the plan is the close relationship of transportation, transit-oriented development, affordable housing. The plan focuses on how to make the city affordable so that more individuals and families can find housing there. With the anticipated increase in population comes transportation strains. The plan states that the need to create viable pedestrian, bicycle, and transit options is paramount as the City’s population grows. The Ballpark neighborhood has seen a large share of this growth since the adoption of this plan in 2018, primarily in new multifamily development. PLAN SALT LAKE Plan Salt Lake was adopted in December 2015 and gives a vision for the city through the year 2040. The plan gives a framework to prepare the city for the growth that is anticipated to come in future years. STUDENT PROJECT BALLPARK NEIGHBORHOOD MASTER PLAN, UNIVERSITY OF UTAH – 2020 A group of students from the University of Utah’s Department of City and Metropolitan Planning worked with members of the Ballpark Neighborhood Council to complete a neighborhood master plan. The plan identified a vision statement for the neighborhood: The Ballpark Neighborhood is a safe, vibrant, diverse, connected, and accessible neighborhood that welcomes new growth while preserving the existing sense of community. Safe – Residents will feel safe in their homes and throughout their community, and the neighborhood will be perceived as a safe area of the city. Vibrant – The Ballpark Neighborhood will be a destination for culture, arts, and entertainment that will be economically thriving and attractive to new businesses and visitors. Diverse – The neighborhood will include a wide variety of land uses, amenities, and housing types to serve the needs of its diverse residents. Connected and Accessible – The Ballpark Neighborhood will be a “gateway to the City” that feels both physically and socially connected to the rest of the City as well as a internally. Balanced – The neighborhood will welcome new growth while preserving the existing sense of community. In addition, the plan identified five focus areas to help guide the future of the area.: • Reimagining Main Street • Creating Housing Opportunities for Current and Future Neighbors • Increasing Mobility Options • Greening Ballpark • Creating Vibrant Transit Station Areas Ballpark Neighborhood condominiums / GSBS Consulting COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS | EXISTING CONDITIONS 30 LEGEND Site Boundary Sidewalks Ballpark Station CONNECTIVITY AND THE PEDESTRIAN & BIKING ENVIRONMENT The Ballpark’s central location along several major regional transportation routes, proximity to transit, and transitioning urban landscape offer opportunities for enhanced pedestrian and bicycle connectivity. Figure 3.4 shows the existing location of bike, pedestrian and transit facilities in the neighborhood. As the area continues to develop, enhancing multimodal connectivity should be a priority to preserve existing connections and create a safe and efficient area to navigate for all ages and abilities. The Ballpark neighborhood has several high-volume roadways. 1300 South serves a high volume of east-west traffic from State Street to I-15, with 900 South and 1700 South also carrying notable traffic volumes. State Street and 300 West carry high volumes of vehicles moving north-south. The neighborhood is served by three TRAX light rail lines which run through the heart of the neighborhood, Figure 3.4. The area is also served by two frequent bus lines, the 9 (900 South) and the 200 (State Street) as well as the 17 (1700 South) which runs at a 30 minute frequency. The area has several existing bike routes connecting though the area. Main Street is identified as a bikeway and has a designated striped bike lane. The section of 900 South from I-15 to 300 West will have a buffered bike lane, and a marked shared roadway is planned to connect Paxton Avenue to the 1300 South underpass. I-15 I-15 0 600 1,200300Feet 1700 SOUTH ST A T E S T R E E T 900 SOUTH route 17 route 200 route 9 trax line FIGURE 3.4: SIDEWALK AND TRANSIT MAP photo credit / caption COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS 31 Sidewalks are mostly complete in the study area although there are large gaps south of 1300 South between 300 West and West Temple, and in the north- west area of the project area. The existing sidewalk network needs repair along many of the major roadways and often provides limited width and space for movement alongside fast-moving vehicle traffic. Other obstacles, like light poles and uneven surfaces, present barriers for those using mobility devices and force pedestrians to navigate around them. Overall, east-west connectivity for pedestrians and bicycles is limited due to several roadways and rail lines which inhibit ease of movement through the area. Pedestrians and bicycles within the neighborhood must cross the TRAX line at either 900 South, 1300 South or 1700 South resulting in frequent illegal and dangerous crossings at points along the rail line. Several roadways with infrequent signalized crossings also act as barriers for navigating the neighborhood, such as 1300 South and 300 West, which have infrequent crossings and require pedestrians to extend their travel distance to cross at the nearest stoplight or cross illegally. Local business in the Ballpark Station Area. COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS 32 SUMMARY OF STATION AREA CASE STUDIES Creating thriving and inclusive neighborhoods in areas surrounding major and minor league ballparks is a goal that cities strive to achieve through a variety of infrastructure and non-infrastructure investments. However, achieving this goal is often a challenge. Ballpark architecture and design plays a role in how well it integrates and enhances the surrounding community, and there are several other factors extending beyond the Ballpark itself that could help accelerate or facilitate economic and community vibrancy and integrate these otherwise disparate land uses. This exploration of case studies from ballpark areas across the country provides the planning team and the community examples of ballpark design and ballpark district activation strategies and outcomes to understand and identify lessons learned from similar ballparks that might support the vision and goals for the Smith’s Ballpark area. An initial list of case studies were selected based on those ballpark areas that are similar in urban scale and context to Smith’s Ballpark, including proximity to high quality transit, and community activation/integration. The full case study summary can be found in Appendix x. The selected case studies included: Major League Baseball Ballparks • Boston, MA • Chicago, IL Minor League Ballparks • Memphis, TN • Oklahoma City, OK • El Paso, TX The Major League examples informed decision making by providing examples of ballparks with longstanding success. The Minor League case studies provide a comparison of areas facing similar opportunities and challenges as Salt Lake City. Table 3.4 shows a comparison between the three Minor League case studies in comparison to Smith’s Ballpark. TABLE 3.4: SUMMARY OF BALLPARK CASE STUDIES Case Studies Salt Lake City Ballpark neighborhood Chickasaw Bricktown Ballpark Southwest University Park AutoZone Park Location Salt Lake City, UT Oklahoma City, OK El Paso, TX Memphis, TN Opening Date -April 1998 April 2014 April 2000 Stadium Capacity -13,066 9,500 14,320 Surrounding Area (1 mi) Facts Population (2020)15,587 4,532 14,994 12,210 Population Growth (2010 to 2020)+15%+60%+11%+1% Median Household Income (2020)$43,166 $56,927 $16,713 $25,195 Occupied Housing Units (2020)64% Rented/36% Owned 90% Rented/10% Owned 84% Rented/16% Owned 89% Rented/11% Owned Ballpark Area Features Identified in an area plan or Comprehensive Plan Pedestrian-only infrastructure Multimodal Connectivity (bike share, bike lanes, shared mobility) Accessible by high quality transit Parks/green spaces within the area Diverse surrounding land uses Adaptive reuse of existing buildings Special zoning regulations for the area Ballpark hosts other events (sporting and non-sporting) Supports community events within the Ballpark area COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS | CASE STUDIES33 Case Studies Salt Lake City Ballpark neighborhoodChickasaw Bricktown BallparkSouthwest University ParkAutoZone Park LocationSalt Lake City, UTOklahoma City, OKEl Paso, TXMemphis, TN Opening Date-April 1998April 2014April 2000 Stadium Capacity-13,0669,50014,320 Surrounding Area (1 mi) Facts Population (2020)15,5874,53214,99412,210 Population Growth (2010 to 2020)+15%+60%+11%+1% Median Household Income (2020)$43,166$56,927$16,713$25,195 Occupied Housing Units (2020)64% Rented/36% Owned90% Rented/10% Owned84% Rented/16% Owned89% Rented/11% Owned Ballpark Area Features Identified in an area plan or Comprehensive Plan Pedestrian-only infrastructure Multimodal Connectivity (bike share, bike lanes, shared mobility) Accessible by high quality transit Parks/green spaces within the area Diverse surrounding land uses Adaptive reuse of existing buildings Special zoning regulations for the area Ballpark hosts other events (sporting and non-sporting) Supports community events within the Ballpark area CASE STUDY | MAJOR LEAGUE EXAMPLES BOSTON – FENWAY PARK LOCATION: Boston, MA CITY POPULATION: 694,583 STADIUM CAPACITY: 37,305 OPENING DATE: April 1912 Key Takeaways Fenway Park is one of the most iconic ballparks and ballpark areas in the MLB because of its history, design, and the activity and draw of the surrounding neighborhood. Some of these themes are hard to replicate, mainly because the neighborhood has grown up around the ballpark. Additionally, in the past 10 years, the neighborhood has seen millions of dollars in new development, creating an area that attracts students, young professionals, and families alike to both live and visit. However, there are some strategies that could be implemented to help recreate some of Fenway’s success, including: • Celebrate what makes a ballpark and its surrounding area unique. Some of Fenway’s most memorable elements have been engineered away in other more modern ballparks. Irregularities in design and layout should be celebrated to foster a unique sense of place. • Extend the ballpark atmosphere beyond the ballpark. Fenway Park’s gameday atmosphere spills out into the surrounding streets for multiple blocks, partly due to the limited space inside the ballpark. While that may be hard for other ballparks to replicate, the ballpark atmosphere is possible to foster and create outside the ballpark by creative use of right of way (closing/reusing streets) and special building regulations (zoning and design guidelines) CHICAGO – WRIGLEY FIELD LOCATION: Chicago, IL CITY POPULATION: 2,693,976 STADIUM CAPACITY: 41,649 OPENING DATE: April 1914 Key Takeaways Like Fenway, Wrigley’s age and history play a huge role in elevating the ballpark to one of the most beloved in all of baseball. However, there are some applicable strategies that can be applied to the SLC Ballpark area to help recreate some of what makes Wrigley so special including: • Having an open dialogue between ballpark and neighborhood. The incredibly close integration of ballpark and neighborhood has created several challenges through the years. The partnership between the two has been rocky at times but having both an open dialogue through a neighborhood council, along with a formalized agreement in place, have helped the two navigate disputes and thrive together. • Blur lines between ballpark and neighborhood. There is perhaps no better example of this takeaway than Wrigley Field. Surrounding businesses have taken advantage of the low walls in the outfield and built bleachers that can see into the stadium, becoming some of the most iconic elements of the stadium experience. While there are logistical challenges to implementing some of these elements at modern ballparks, creative ideas should be explored to help create a more permeable relationship between the ballpark and its surroundings. • The Chicago Cubs established a Neighborhood Preservation Fund in 2021 to invest in the surrounding neighborhood through street lighting, paving and infrastructure work around the ballpark. © Yards of Summer © Twitter (@BobVorwald) COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS | CASE STUDIES 34 COMMUNITY PROFILE CASE STUDY | MINOR LEAGUE EXAMPLES OKLAHOMA CITY – CHICKASAW BRICKTOWN BALLPARK LOCATION: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma CITY POPULATION: 551,789 *Table 3.4 shows comparison to Salt Lake Ballpark Neighborhood Viewed as one of the most successful ballparks in the minor league, Bricktown Ballpark was part of the larger Bricktown redevelopment plan that helped energize the surrounding area while generating $238 million dollars in housing and mixed-use development. This case study highlights practices and lessons learned in supporting economic development, community-driven design and activation, and how the ballpark and surrounding area have blended development and culture. Key Takeaways • Look to create additional drivers beyond the ballpark. While a ballpark can help define an area and be the primary attractor, other community serving destinations can help create a more year-round destination and help to activate the area on non-gamedays. • Make multimodal connectivity safe and efficient, on gamedays and non- gamedays. While most visitors may still drive to the game, providing safe and convenient options for people to walk, bike, and take transit can benefit both gameday traffic operations and the neighborhood on non-gamedays. • Adaptative Reuse of existing infrastructure. Thinking creatively about existing infrastructure can help add to an area’s sense of place by adding an element of originality to an area. Projects can include the reuse of existing ROW or other urban utility infrastructure. © TripAdvisor OKC Dodgers Baseball Game (© nbykzs168.com)Winter Festival at Bricktown Ballpark COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS | CASE STUDIES35 COMMUNITY PROFILE © TripAdvisor EL PASO – SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY PARK LOCATION: El Paso, Texas CITY POPULATION: 682,669 *Table 3.4 shows comparison to Salt Lake Ballpark Neighborhood Opened on the edge of the Downtown area, El Paso’s ballpark case study highlights successes in integrating and celebrating the community’s culture through public art and activated public spaces. The ballpark is also on a challenging site, segregated from the surrounding neighborhoods by a freeway and heavy rail lines, causing the City and its partners to think creatively how they enhance the gameday experience of getting to the stadium, while also improving neighborhood mobility. Key Takeaways • A ballpark is not enough. From an economic development and redevelopment perspective, Southwest University Park confirms what many other Cities have encountered when building a new sports facility: that while it can help kick start or accelerate economic development, in and of itself the ballpark is not enough to be the sole driver for an area’s revitalization. • Strategic connectivity investments can go a long way. The connectivity of the area surrounding Southwest University Park suffers from a range of transportation barriers such as freight rail tracks and a major freeway. The City has focused on improving a few strategic connections to the ballpark, rather than improving every street in the area. The Durango Street overpass and the Missouri Road shared street are two examples of those strategic investments to enhance immediate ballpark connectivity. COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS | CASE STUDIES 36 COMMUNITY PROFILE MEMPHIS – AUTOZONE PARK LOCATION: Memphis, Tennessee CITY POPULATION: 650,618 POPULATION RACE & ETHNICITY: *Table 3.4 shows comparison to Salt Lake Ballpark Neighborhood Home of the Memphis Redbirds, the AutoZone ballpark is renowned for its retro design, borrowing design elements from the surrounding historic architecture, and the efforts to integrate with and enhance the surrounding neighborhood. The ballpark won a Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) Charter Award for the way in which the ballpark laid the groundwork for kickstarting community revitalization and the creation of a ballpark district. The Ballpark District was a recipient of an Urban Land Institute (ULI) Award for Excellence in 2002 as Downtown Memphis developed into an enhanced neighborhood. Key Takeaways • Not a ballpark, a ballpark district. What makes AutoZone Park a standout is that it was not designed simply as a ballpark. The ballpark was conceived as a “Ballpark District” including dense multifamily development, new office buildings, a minor league baseball museum, a public elementary school (important for attracting families with children to downtown), and the adaptive reuse of the upper stories of an old YMCA building to lofts, along with the reuse of other historic buildings. • Ballpark as public space. The entry plaza, diagonally across an intersection from the landmark Peabody Hotel, provides a place for people to enjoy music, food, and entertainment before and after baseball games, and it functions as a gathering place at other times. The baseball team and the city both work to activate these spaces on gamedays and non-gamedays alike. • Parking as an activator. Rather than rely on a massive parking structure/lot, fans can find about 6,000 parking spaces within four blocks of the ballpark. The parking strategy works well as people can find less expensive parking further from the ballpark and as they stroll to and from the game they help to animate the streets. Memphis AutoZone Park (© Stadium Journey) COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS | CASE STUDIES37 SUMMARY The three case studies highlight different design, policy, and program initiatives that have helped activate, connect, and integrate ballpark areas and the neighborhoods and communities that surround them. The following key takeaways were inferred from the case studies research: • Strategically interconnecting diverse forms of transportation, including “first and last mile” options, is important in creating an accessible ballpark and surrounding neighborhood for both gameday mobility, and neighborhood connectivity on non-gamedays. • Establishing connected, accessible, and pedestrian-oriented land uses and facilities creates a vibrant and engaging experience for visitors and residents in the area. • Holding multiple types of events, including community-driven events within a ballpark area, such as community movie nights, concerts, or festivals can help engage the surrounding community and enhance surrounding neighborhoods. • Reusing existing buildings and infrastructure can reduce infrastructure costs, enhance the sense of place, maintain neighborhood history, and character, and integrate ballpark design and uses with a surrounding neighborhood. • Establishing unique goals, policies, and regulations can help develop a ballpark neighborhood that complements the area’s desired character. While a ballpark can help spur initial development and investment in an area, development or redevelopment efforts will often require additional supportive policies, financing, programs, and initiatives in order to truly maximize the investment in the Ballpark itself. Mural outside of the Urban Indian Center on 1300 South / GSBS Consulting COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS | CASE STUDIES 38 Overview Over the course of nine months, the Ballpark Community developed the Ballpark Station Area plan through a consultant-guided process. Because of the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic, the process was completely virtual except for the final community event. The process included engagement on several levels through live virtual events, one-on-one Stakeholder meetings, small group Steering Committee meetings and online outreach including an interactive map and a bilingual survey. The Community gave input on a future land use strategy and design considerations. The project area is centered on Smith’s Ballpark and the Ballpark TRAX station, an area considered the “Heart” of the Ballpark Neighborhood. The Plan includes guidelines and a vision for the future of the Ballpark neighborhood from I-15 to State Street, 900 South to 1700 South and into the surrounding community. Community Council The public-facing part of the process began in December 2020 with a presentation about the Ballpark Station Area Planning process to the Ballpark Community Council and Ballpark Community. The Consulting team shared the schedule and engagement tools with the community and answered questions, addressed concerns, and provided information to promote community involvement throughout the process. Members from the project team attended the monthly community council meetings to better understand what community members in the Ballpark neighborhood experience and to gain a better understanding of the needs of the area. The draft Station Area Plan and supporting strategies were then presented to the Community during the X, XXXX Community Council Meeting for review and before finalizing the project recommendations and concepts. Steering Committee A steering committee was formed to help guide the process, review material, and to act as ambassadors for the Station Area Plan. The four Steering Committee meetings occurred on the evenings of February 4th, March 11th, April 8th, and May 13th, 2021. Steering Committee members were invited from a diverse list of community members provided by the Community Council leadership as well as individuals recommended by other Steering Committee members and the project management group. The Steering Committee included residents, business owners, representatives from Smith’s Ballpark, and local non-profit and community organization leaders. The Steering Committee was responsible for: • Refining the goals and vision for the area • Reviewing case studies for other ballparks • Reviewing existing conditions and help identifying neighborhood needs • Reviewing draft material before Community events and plan finalization Online Outreach PROJECT WEBSITE Several online outreach efforts accompanied the small group Steering Committee meetings, Stakeholder meetings, and community events during the process. A bilingual project website was created as a platform to provide information, alert the community of upcoming events, and to guide participants to an interactive map and idea board, Figure 3.5. The interactive map and idea board encouraged community members to share what they like, dislike, and specific ideas about their neighborhood on a collaborative discussion-based format, Figure x. Comments posted on the interactive map were included in the development of the neighborhood vision and goals as well as in the recommendations developed during the process. SUMMARY OF PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT FIGURE 3.5: INFORMATION PAGE ON THE PROJECT WEBSITE AND INTERACTIVE MAP COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS | PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT39 COMMUNITY POSTCARD AND SURVEY A bilingual community survey was distributed online to gather values, emerging ideas, and identify the needs of the community. A postcard was sent in February 2021 to every address within the project area and to every address within three blocks outside the project area boundary advertising the Ballpark project and survey, Figure 3.6. The postcard invited community members to the website and provided a call to action to help guide future development in the neighborhood. The City promoted the survey on their social media platforms in addition to the post card. The Ballpark survey received more than 530 responses in the month that it was active. All survey respondents were over the age of 21 with the largest group of participants being between 31 and 40, which is representative of the largest age group in the project area. Demographics for the area show a high number of young children ages 0-14 in the neighborhood, but this number significantly drops in the 15-19 cohort which may account for the lack of response from that group. Figure 3.7 illustrates how residents responded when asked what they like about they neighborhood. FIGURE 3.6: PROJECT POST CARD FIGURE 3.7: SURVEY RESULTS SHOWING WHAT THE BALLPARK COMMUNITY LIKES IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS | PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 40 Area Stakeholders Several stakeholders were identified during the process and invited to two one-on-one meetings to review their experience in the neighborhood, their vision for the area, and to review the draft Plan. Stakeholders included: • The Utah Transit Authority (UTA) • The Salt Lake Bees • An educator small group session • Colmena Group • Nate Wade Subaru • The Housing Authority of Salt Lake City • The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City • CW Urban and Defy Colab • Salt Lake City Parks and Public Lands Department • The Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities • The Salt Lake City Planning Division • Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division • Salt Lake City Transportation Division Community Events The Community was invited to two Community Events during the process. COMMUNITY EVENT 1 DATE: March 20, 2021 LOCATION: Zoom The first event explored Growth & Economic Development opportunities for the neighborhood, case studies of other ballparks identified in the Case Study element of this document, and barriers and big ideas for transportation and connectivity for the neighborhood. Participants were invited to interact with the Consulting team to develop key ideas and terms for the vision for the future of the Ballpark Area and to identify key public and private actions to achieve the vision. COMMUNITY EVENT 2 DATE: May 22, 2021 LOCATION: Smith’s Ballpark and Watchtower Coffee and Comics The second community event was an in-person open house and provided an opportunity for the community to review and comment on the draft future land use vision. Screenshot from the first virtual community event. Second community event at Watchtower Coffee & Comics. COMMUNITY EXPLORATION & ANALYSIS | PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT41 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK implementation plan 43 Implementation Period strategies Immediate 2-5 Years 5+ Years Ongoing Take advantage of current development opportunities, existing services, and amenities to enhance neighborhood livability. Implement the goals and strategies identified in the Central 9th Chapter of the Downtown Master Plan, 300 West Corridor Redesign, State Street Project Area Plan, Homeless Resource Centers Neighborhood Action Strategies, Salt Lake City Moderate Income Housing Plan, Salt Lake City Parks & Public Lands Needs Assessment, Citywide Gentrification Assessment & Displacement Mitigation Plan, Growing SLC and the Salt Lake City Street Lighting Master Plan. Update the city’s zoning code and map, as appropriate to implement the provisions of this plan. Amend Section 21A.26.078: TSA Transit Station Area District of the Salt Lake City Municipal Code to include the Ballpark Station Area as one of the existing TSA districts or create a new one if needed. This may include requiring activation of the 1300 South frontage with restaurants, shops, street furniture and trees, implementing streetscape improvements to accommodate pedestrian volumes, allowing heights comparable to heights in other Urban Station Areas, and protect the viewshed of the Wasatch Range from inside Smith’s Ballpark. Evaluate and amend the City’s zoning code and map, as appropriate to include the urban design considerations identified in each of the character areas in this plan. Evaluate and amend the City’s zoning code and map, as appropriate, to extend the existing State Street Overlay Zone to the west side of Main Street. Evaluate and amend the City’s zoning code and map, as appropriate to implement the priorities for the 300 West Character Areas by ensuring that amenities, connections, and services needed to support higher density development are included in development plans for the area, that development proposals include mid-block and other connections to break down current large commercial blocks into smaller, more walkable blocks and that where appropriate, development proposals incorporate access to existing and planned TRAX crossings. Identify opportunities to provide community amenities, shops, and services within the heart for year-round activation. Provide enhanced street and pedestrian lighting to improve safety and visibility. Create a dense urban environment and entertainment zone around the Ballpark. Invest in the station area and around the Ballpark to improve the overall neighborhood and enhance the opportunities in the Heart of the Ballpark. Improve east-west connectivity across TRAX to the north and the south of 1300 South. At a minimum, pedestrian/bicycle crossings should be identified to allow pedestrians and cyclists to move east to west without having to go to 1300 or 1700 South. Install side-loading platforms at the Ballpark TRAX Station. Consider redeveloping the TRAX station parking lot and bus turnaround for higher density uses and to provide neighborhood amenities. Install pedestrian crossings east and west of TRAX on 1300 South on either side of the UTA crossing barrier. Consider redevelopment opportunities for the City-owned parking lot at 1300 South and West Temple while maintaining parking in the vicinity to potentially increase density and improve the urban environment. Install a festival street on West Temple and plazas adjacent to the stadium. Invest in a community amenity which may include a library with the opportunity of additional public space. Integrate greenspace and “green” elements into the urban landscape. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 44 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN45 Enhance public space surrounding the ballpark and include public art and references to historical elements. Designate West Temple between 1300 South and Albemarle Avenue as a Festival Street for non-gameday and gameday activation including farmers markets, community celebrations, food truck festivals and neighborhood concerts. Implement a district-parking strategy that utilizes un-used area parking and parking garages for game days to minimize the need for parking fields in the area. Enhance the ballpark’s relationship with the neighborhood by identifying opportunities to activate the West Temple and 1300 South facades of the stadium on non-game days and incorporate public green space, non-motorized connections, plazas, and similar public spaces around the stadium. If feasible, identify a strategy to bury power lines as development in the Ballpark Neighborhood occurs. Increase connectivity of the neighborhood. Improve overall connectivity and walkability in the area. Study the potential future lane reconfiguration of 1300 South to eliminate or narrow traffic lanes and expand and improve the sidewalk. Utilize existing alleyways, midblock, and truncated connections to create a system of bike and pedestrian pathways through the neighborhood. Implement the planned TRAX line pedestrian crossings to the north of the current Ballpark Station. Widen and enhance sidewalks to improve pedestrian comfort through the addition of street furnishings, pedestrian lighting and a buffer from moving traffic. Implement pedestrian level lighting to improve safety and visibility. Establish specific bicycle routes through the neighborhood according to the Salt Lake City Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan. Reconfigure Ballpark TRAX Station to change from a suburban-style station that has northern platform access only from the east parking lot into an urban-style station that allows access from both the east and west sides of the station. This would include new access at the north end of the platform from Lucy Avenue/200 West on the west side of the TRAX rails. Redevelop part of the current surface parking lots to transit supportive uses. Establish a pedestrian crossing to the east and west of the UTA crossing barrier across 1300 South. Study future crossings south of the 1300 South crossing at the TRAX line. Implementation Period Action Immediate 2-5 Years 5+ Years Ongoing Increase urban design quality. Improve safety. Improve pedestrian experience and safety. Install pedestrian-level street lighting. Require ground level uses in new buildings to incorporate pedestrian-level strategies. Ensure adequate sidewalk width and protection strips on primary walk routes, particularly around the TRAX station. Ensure ongoing maintenance of all facilities to repair uneven sidewalks, functioning signals and frequent trash receptacles. Improve ADA accessibility though sidewalk repair and removal of obstacles. Identify and implement best practices in urban design to improve neighborhood safety. Identify opportunities for interaction. Eliminate “blind corners” or areas. Implement appropriate lighting for safety. Enhance social vibrancy. Support events and placemaking efforts including community art, pop-up events, and temporary food vendors. Enhance greenspace in the neighborhood. Evaluate the opportunity for future green space on the current Public Utilities site if and when Salt Lake Department of Public Utilities moves offices to a new location. Explore options for additional greenspace in the heart of the neighborhood in and around the ballpark. Enhance the urban tree canopy in underserved areas of the neighborhood and require additional street trees and urban greenery with new development. Maintain all green spaces with trash receptacles, pedestrian lighting and pedestrian furniture. Improve the quality of current and future greenspace. Ensure funding for additional maintenance and staffing as additional greenspace is added. Implementation Period Action Immediate 2-5 Years 5+ Years Ongoing IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 46 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN47 Increase affordability and attainability of housing for current and future residents. Provide a diversity of housing types and options for different incomes, familial status, age, and needs. Promote a diversity in the size of new units in the neighborhood to accommodate residents in different stages of life, including families with children. Utilize the RDA State Street Project Area as a tool to capture reinvestment in the neighborhood and help encourage a diversity of housing types. Increase opportunities for home ownership in the neighborhood. Explore alternative options for ownership strategies including land trusts and co-ops . Provide down-payment assistance or other programs for qualifying residents. Mitigate the negative impacts of gentrification as development occurs. Continue to provide and market home repair programs for qualifying residents. Provide education and renter legal assistance to help current renters stay in place. Support development assistance and financing programs to maintain affordability. Preserve existing social services and provide additional services as development occurs to support housing options and access to opportunity at a variety of income levels. Implementation Period Action Immediate 2-5 Years 5+ Years Ongoing 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED From George Chapman to Everyone 06:52 PM so is colony b on 1300S going to be changed to recognize lack of pedestrian access (minimal sidewalk) 228w needs a sidewalk not a building next to the sidewalk (RDA approved loan) From Patrick Quinn to Everyone 06:59 PM The report says we need more single family homes, along with green space. That seems inconsistent with 10 story buildings. You have mentioned "current scale", but doesn't a 120 foot building go against this stated scale goal? Will all ‘upgrades’ be south of 1300? What are the plans for the Horizonte lot? Please elaborate on these topics. From Jessa Tuminez to Everyone 07:02 PM Parking is a huge issue already in the 'heart of the neighborhood' area, how does future zoning help with this? I'm particularly concerned with the 'replacement' of current parking by TRAX as show in the image shown earlier with a six story building From Amy J. Hawkins, Chair to Everyone 07:04 PM Here are some details about Colony B, but not the address: https://www.defycolabs.com/communities/project-one-b7jry From Jesse Hulse to Everyone 07:05 PM The heart of the neighborhood zone appears to incorporate single family home areas just south of the stadium on Richards St. and the Paxton & Lucy Ave NW of the stadium. Is it anticipated that they will be zoned for high density 10 story buildings as well or will there be some nuance applied to this diagram? From Annette & Mike Wheeler to Everyone 07:05 PM So if the city will be removng existing parking in the heart of Ballpark, it seems prudent to restrict parking around Ballpark to residents only, esepcilly on game days. Otherwise, residents will be negatively impacted by non-residents coming to games. Those non-residents would be encouraged to take public transportation rather than using their cars if permit parking is enforced. They can park at TRAX stations and commute in a more environmental and neighborhood friendly way. From Anthony W to Everyone 07:06 PM What is the current character and scale of the west temple character district? There are parking lots, multi family, business, and just a hand full of single family homes. How do you maintain the scale and character when it has no cohesive identity? The plan talks about a potentially 120-foot building on the east side of west temple in the parking lot. Is that the same scale and density? Will the single family homes on west temple across the street be locked in as low intensity forever while high intensity is built all around it? Even on side streets like Lucy and Paxon? It seems like the city wants to add extreme density on SLC owned parking lot on 1300s and the UTA parcel by trax while parts of the neighborhood are just stuck in a low intensity zone. From Amy J. Hawkins, Chair to Everyone 07:07 PM The plan does state that an action we should take to increase attainability of housing for current and future residents is “Increase opportunities for home ownership in the neighborhood.” I’m not sure it specifies single family. From George Chapman to Everyone 07:07 PM we complained to rda about the minimization of the sidewalk on the project at 228w 1300s so how are the pedestrians going to be helped with a minimouse sidewalk. how does SLC suggest improving the sidewalk at 228w???!! There is an RDA approved building limiting the sidewalk From lucy cabrera to Everyone 07:08 PM That green space is now full of rocks bcuz of all the people laying down and using their drugs From George Chapman to Everyone 07:13 PM but parking is needed at Ballpark Station. UTA keeps removing parking at rail and it discourages ridership. plus security at 1300S station is not effective I thought that we were in a drought/desert. why put in medians when a wider sidewalk would be better. SLC stopped watering medians a few years ago in another drought why didn't 228W require 10 ft wide sidewalks From George Chapman to Everyone 07:15 PM Amy - RDA was told that their loan would hurt pedestrian access on 1300S and we asked for wider sidewalks. City Council was told but they ignored it. sorry goodbye From Jessa Tuminez to Everyone 07:18 PM A few weeks back, I provided comments / change recommendations on the boundaries of 'Heart of the Neighborhood' to improve conformity of use, reactivate the neighborhood and increase safety between Paxton and Jefferson Park...have the comments been considered ? I provided the comments to Nannette Amazing, thank you! From George Hauser to Everyone 07:19 PM S Washington south of the I15 ramp should be included in the connectivity map. what about including a tunnel under the I15 ramp at S Washington? From Marcus Lonardo to Everyone 07:20 PM George, I agree! Jessa, great comment! When will the revised plan be finalized? From George Hauser to Everyone 07:22 PM Also, there could be a mid-block connector between the south end of S Washington just south of Brooklyn to 200 W. This would require the property owner to dedicate a portion of their property, but it would enhance the value of their property and add a valuable public connection. From Jessa Tuminez to Everyone 07:26 PM Any reason why the heart of neighborhood is not just blue all across all the way to the yellow line on this map? From Amy J. Hawkins, Chair to Everyone 07:26 PM Is 120 feet allowed anywhere outside of the current downtown zoning? Unless I really don’t understand Form Based II zoning, 120 is not what’s currently permitted around the Central 9th station. From Jessa Tuminez to Everyone 07:27 PM LOTs of opportunity to revitalize these areas which are, right now, ridden with crime AND under-utilized lots From Marcus Lonardo to Everyone 07:29 PM Amen, Jessa!! At minimum, put the TSA zoning along the trax line and all the way to the park. From Anthony W to Everyone 07:29 PM The west temple character zone does not make sense. it bisects the heart. West temple is a mix of use. your talking about putting a 120 ft building on the east side and then expecting the other parcels on west temple to stay the same? or what is meant by maintain the character? From Jessa Tuminez to Everyone 07:31 PM TSA zoning along the trax line and all the way to the park would be a great idea and I think contributes to the overeall goals of this initiative From Reed Sherman to Everyone 07:32 PM Yes! Power lines in the ground is a great idea. Good luck in getting RMP to comply. From Annette & Mike Wheeler to Everyone 07:35 PM Can you please be more specific about how you will mitigate the parking issues on game days? Have you considered requiring suburban attendees use public transportation instead of their cars. I my opinion, that would require zero parking for suburbanites to preserve parking for urban residents. From Andre to Everyone 07:39 PM I do think TSA zoning as it's currently drawn is not enough. Along 200 W trax line extending the to the TSA zone makes more sense and more conducive to the goals of the plan zoning which encourages development but no/minimum parking is what I'd like to see to encourage trax ridership and biking / pedestrian activities From Danielle Hildebrand to Everyone 07:39 PM A TSA zone should absolutely be extended all of the way along the train line on 200 West. This specific whole street is commercial on the West side mixed with 6 story buildings on the east (this is between 1300 South and 900 South). There are a handful of homes next to 6-story buildings that have been termed "flawed urban planning" at the moment. These homes have not been included in the TSA zone & I strongly believe were missed. From Jesse Hulse to Everyone 07:39 PM Planning team, it’s concerning that problems we are seeing with FB-UN2 aren’t being addressed and FB- UN3 seems poised to repeat them. It would be disappointing to say the least if we don’t address these things now with FB-UN2&3 and before new Ballpark zoning which may follow in the footsteps of those FB zones, can you please add that to the notes and could we follow up on that? From Andre to Everyone 07:40 PM also, encouraging and protecting resident only parking Iin the heart of the neighborhood is a good idea. Can we also see EV parking to encourage environment friendly modes of transportation? From John Anderson to Everyone 07:41 PM Thanks Jesse, I have those notes. As mentioned the City Council is considering creating the FB-UN3 and is still accepting public information. Here's a link with more information: https://fleet-block-rezone- slcgov.hub.arcgis.com/ From Marcus Lonardo to Everyone 07:42 PM Andre- great comment on resident only parking. From Jesse Hulse to Everyone 07:43 PM Thanks John, we will revisit and resubmit and follow up with our city council reps From Jessa Tuminez to Everyone 07:45 PM to mitigate gentrification, the answer is to encourage development competition. Having zoning the encourages that in the ballpark area from trax line and all the way across Jefferson park would do this sadly, just having a couple streets 'high density' would just encourage these high-priced townhomes and push current residents out From Amy J. Hawkins, Chair to Everyone 07:45 PM I’m glad to see “increase opportunities for home ownership” make the final document. According to the findings of this plan, only 15% of the homes in our neighborhood are owner-occupied. Continuing to fill the neighborhood with rentals will, I believe, continue to politically-disenfranchise the neighborhood. From Jeff Sandstrom to Everyone 07:47 PM Thank you for addressing the need for opportunities for home ownership in the neighborhood. Home ownership, I feel, is an important part of improving the quality of the neighborhood through increased engagement and involvement in the community. From Jessa Tuminez to Everyone 07:48 PM home ownership needs to evolve as concept. Median income is 23K in Ballpark! So we need to make sure people have a 'home' even if it's not in the traditional sense of owning a home From Andre to Everyone 07:49 PM Increasing the supply of housing is the best way to decrease the cost. From Jessa Tuminez to Everyone 07:49 PM HUGE thank you Christine!! You did an amazing job From Marcus Lonardo to Everyone 07:50 PM I'll second that! GSBS did an incredible job on this first draft. From Jessa Tuminez to Everyone 07:50 PM I am so so SO excited about the Ballpark transformation plan. LONG overdue. Just please listen to us who have been in this community and who own and have lived here and seen it for all its ups and downs From Amy J. Hawkins, Chair to Everyone 07:50 PM Folks on this call may be interested in Salt Lake City’s citywide Gentrification Assessment and Displacement Mitigation Study. The lead consultant for the study, Baird+Driskell Community Planning, will be presenting an overview of the project team and process to date to the Human Rights Commission on Tuesday night at 5:30. The Zoom info and link to agenda are below. Please feel free to share with anyone else that might be interested. https://www.utah.gov/pmn/sitemap/publicbody/1270.html https://www.slc.gov/boards/human-rights-commission-agendas-minutes/ From Jeff Sandstrom to Everyone 07:51 PM A second thank you for adding significant consideration to the current character and scale of the existing areas before approving new zoning. It is very important to maintain the existing scope, scale and historic nature of the area while welcoming new, appropriate development. From Marcus Lonardo to Everyone 07:52 PM Also- big shout out to everyone involved in community outreach! Such a distinction from the homeless center fiasco. Thank you for allowing our feedback in this process. From Jessa Tuminez to Everyone 07:52 PM Agree, Marcus! From Marcus Lonardo to Everyone 07:53 PM Which areas of this plan have FB-UN2 or 3? From Patrick Quinn to Everyone 07:53 PM What was the reasoning/justification behind specifically preserving views for the Ballpark? Aren't these same views important to residents? The Ballpark is only used half of the year and for a couple of days a week at the height of the season. Why would the city and Planning Commission ignore (overlook) those same concerns for community homeowners? If the views you speak of are important to baseball fans who visit the Ballpark for a two or three hours, shouldn't the same consideration be applied to people who live in the neighborhood every day of the year? From Marcus Lonardo to Everyone 07:53 PM I thought heart of the neighborhood was TSA. From Susan Lundmark to Everyone 07:53 PM Thank you for participating and giving us such great feedback and all these comments! From Annette & Mike Wheeler to Everyone 07:53 PM those of us living in an urban neighborhood are more likely to take public transportation. A study is not necessary in the short term to realize that those living in the suburbs could be a more productive target group to require public transportation into our community. If there is not place for them to park, they will be forced to take public transportation. From Jessa Tuminez to Everyone 07:58 PM I'm excited to see the plan evolve. When will we see the next draft taking comments into account? Open dialogue is super important. Can we schedule next session with the public? From Marcus Lonardo to Everyone 07:59 PM Great comment- Jessa I would also like to review a modified plan From Reed Sherman to Everyone 08:02 PM Great plan. I’m all for more trees and less power lines. Love the idea of turning ally ways into pedestrian and bike ways. From:Jim Grisley To:Larsen, Nannette Subject:(EXTERNAL) Ball park upgrade. Date:Thursday, December 16, 2021 1:55:53 PM Attachments:image001.jpg Hello Nannette, I would like to comment on the Ballpark/Party street upgrade. I was at the opening meeting at the site at which Erin gave an outline of the project. As far as I’m concerned this project would be a complete waste of time and money unless the Gail Miller HRC is moved to a more suitable location. The homeless and assorted nefarious characters come from miles around to be near the homeless center and the neighborhood around it ( Ballpark) and the increase in murder, crime and drug use is out of control ! I have personally witnessed drug use right on the HRC property on numerous occasions. The Ballpark proper is inundated with many of these individuals and SLC can’t currently handle it so how would a project like this be any different ? Look at the Police reports as they reflect the dire situation the Ballpark is in. The proposed Library would just become a restroom and loitering area for these folks and the local neighbors would actually see an increase of in crime, vandalism, trespassing ,drug use and prostitution. As far as the Trax station relocation is concerned, it will do absolutely nothing to remedy the pervasive jay walking on 1300 So and 300 W which daily poses a threat to pedestrians and drivers alike. Also, why weren’t there any businesses from 300 West on the planning committee? Seems like the committee was hand picked to avoid any negative comments. I would like to invite you to visit us and I can show you first hand the negative impact the HRC is having on the Ballpark neighborhood and those of us that live and work in it. Please call to discuss at your convenience. Regards, Jim Grisley J.M. Grisley Machine Tools, Inc. 1485 South 300 West Salt Lake City, Ut 84115 From:Danielle HildebrandTo:Larsen NannetteCc:Anderson John; Lundmark Susan Subject:(EXTERNAL) Ballpark Area Plan Feedback Date:Monday, January 17, 2022 1 53:59 PM Attachments:image.pngimage pngimage.pngb8011a30-ee64-4aa4-8fb5-7dffc020bdd1.pngimage.pngimage.pngimage.pngimage.pngimage.png Hello all! Thank you so much for all of your help & choosing my neighborhood as a focal point this year. I purchased in this neighborhood in 2015 and have since broughtmany friends and family members into this neighborhood. We have been dedicated homeowners and neighbors who have continued to look after each other whileour neighborhood was severely impacted on multiple fronts during this past couple years. We have been active on the community council and have manymeetings with the superhero city officials who care deeply about our neighborhood. As our city prepares for our population to double over the next 20-40 years and with our air quality being one of the worst universe-wide, we know that housingnear the transit stations is an urgent need. Nearly all of the homes in this neighborhood are hitting the 100-year-old (+) mark and many were built with poorbuilding standards PRIOR to there even being cars here on our SLC streets. Most of the homes in the ballpark are single family homes and consist of 1-2bedrooms in total. As a homeowner, I completely understand that my 2 bedroom home on the train line is NOT the highest & best use for this property currentlyOR long term. I absolute LOVE what you all have been working towards and think the whole plan is absolutely brilliant. I do think there are 3 properties that were accidentlymissed in the plan that I would like to outline below. We have met with these 4 city officials: DIANA MARTINEZ, KATIA PACE, TREVOR OVENDEN & MEAGANBOOTH who all agreed that "moderate density" is not the appropriate zoning for these 3 properties that sit IN BETWEEN 2 high rise apartment buildings (one tothe north and one to the south). For example, our house is less than 5 feet from a 6 story building and the 4 city officials we met with agreed that this isabsolutely terrible urban planning to keep these properties "as-as." We know that long-term, zoning dictates everything and are extremely hopeful that you wouldagree that these 3 parcels that are DIRECTLY on the trainline were missed during the preplanning and should be changed to be TSA zoning. 1055 S. 200 W. Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (Parcel ID: 1512408008)1049 S. 200 W. Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (Parcel ID: 1512408007)1039 S. 200 W. Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (Parcel ID: 1512408006) If you are familiar with the children's movie "UP," these 3 parcels on 200 West already look like these first 2 photos below from the movie. Additionally, there is agigantic abandoned warehouse directly across the street that is slated to become an enormous skyrise of apartment building soon. Zoning dictates everything sowe are extremely hopeful to not be left to the outcome below. A couple properties down the street, this has already happened. We do not want to become this house. ACTUAL PHOTOS OF THE 3 PARCELS WE ARE REQUESTING A ZONING CHANGE OF: Iii .o Danielle Hildebrand I lillillil From:Ryan Esmay To:Larsen, Nannette Subject:(EXTERNAL) Ballpark Master Plan Date:Friday, December 31, 2021 11:49:22 AM Hi! I'm writing as a homeowner in the heart of the ballpark neighborhood (right next to the trax station), and I just had a few thoughts about the Ballpark master plan that I thought I'dshare. I'm thrilled by the idea of this neighborhood getting more attention since I've always felt it could be lovely if it was just given a bit more care! Some things here are truly beautiful- andconvenient, like the ballpark, and the trax station, but other things definitely need more attention. The sidewalks on my street (Lucy Ave) are not extremely well-lit, nor is 1300South, which is a bummer if we want to go out at night and feel safe. In addition to the lighting problems, 1300 south feels like it belongs to the cars at times, with thin, oftenobstructed sidewalks. I'd love it if my small neighborhood area could start to feel a bit more walkable- I think that would really boost the connectivity of the area. Another issue, far more complicated to solve, is the huge homelessness problem we have inour neighborhood. Many of my neighbors have had break-ins, as have we... and it's too bad! We always want to help them however we can, but it's hard to be empathetic when they leavetrash (and worse things) all over our street and lawn, break into homes, and camp out in the alley behind our backyard. Don't know how to solve the problem exactly, but it's not hard tosee that something needs to be done. I'm absolutely thrilled about the idea of bringing a new library to the ballpark area, might I suggest the large, scarcely used parking lot on West Temple and 1300 S? It's a bit of aneyesore now, and doesn't seem to even be used much, outside of ballgame nights! Anyway, I'm very excited. I'm just one person living here, but if there's anything I can do to help at all, I'd love to be involved however I can be. We love our neighborhood and want tosee it improve and grow, not get neglected. Thanks! All the best, Ryan Esmay From: To: Subject: Date: Hello Nan! TAG SLC Larsen. Nannette: Jake Billitteri; Jordan Atkin (EXTERNAL) Ballpark Master Plan Monday, November 29, 2021 2: 19:23 PM I just left you a VM and figured I would also include an email. We own some property on Goltz Ave (between W. Temple-200W) as well as 1061 S Jefferson. We had some concerns as this little pocket didnt get much attention in the Ballpark Master Plan. Map on page 13 (18 of PDF) did not give this area a color Page 17 (22 of the PDF) calls for medium density -but the C9 Flats is across the street from us and is 6 stories. We were hoping to rezone to allow 4-6 stories as well. We feel Goltz Ave is well suited for higher density as it abuts a park not neighbors. also, the plan doesnt seem to address what this "Medium density Area" is We would really appreciate the opportunity to discuss these concerns and better understand where to direct comments to. Thanks you so much! Jordan Atkin P.O. BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84152-0697 Dear Councilmember Mano, Mr. Norris and Ms. Larsen, We are reaching out to comment on the Ballpark Station Area Plan Draft that was recently released by the Salt Lake City Planning and Zoning Department. We here at TAG SLC are very much interested in the neighborhood and have made significant investments in what we view as one of the most vibrant and exciting areas of Salt Lake City. Overall, we felt that the plan will contribute towards making the neighborhood a more positive place to live. The plans around creating a more engaging West Temple Corridor on both game days and year-round were especially exciting. However, we are concerned that the plan neglects a section of the People’s Freeway area, on Goltz Avenue, where we own several properties. Our concerns regarding the proposed Station Area Plan are centered on an area we feel is being left out. We believe that lack of attention to this location will be detrimental for future development and create a lack of clarity for those seeking to invest in the neighborhood. For example, the Goltz Avenue area is within roughly a quarter mile of both the Ballpark and 200 W TRAX stations but is not included in any character areas or land use map changes intended to facilitate the reimagining of the neighborhood by bringing new amenities and mixed-uses. The plan contradicts itself by showing this area as the “heart of the neighborhood” in Figure 1.1 on the first page of the plan, but then failing to include it in the Character Areas seen in Figure 2.6 and listing it as Medium Density in the Future Land Use Map in Figure 2.9. Aside from the contradictions present in the maps, the absence of details on Goltz Avenue and surrounding streets in the Character Areas leaves many questions as to what exactly the City’s vision for the area is. Moreover, there are no details on types of development appropriate in Medium Density areas on the land use area descriptions on page 18, making this the only land use not described. This land use is present in older documents, are we to assume that definitions carry over or does the city have a different vision for medium density in the Ballpark area? Recent years have seen successful development in this pocket of the Ballpark neighborhood, with the C9 building adding over 90 units in close proximity to TRAX stations and local businesses such as Blue Copper, Laziz and Publik Coffee. We feel that this area is particularly well suited to development according to the statements of the plan as it is close to transit and other public amenities, most notably Jefferson Park. Jefferson Park is the largest established park in the neighborhood 2.79 acres. However, the park is currently viewed by a blight by area residents as demonstrated by multiple news stories over the last year (see attached). Page 23 of the plan advises on ways to create successful public space through urban design, including a recommendation to line public spaces with public uses to improve accessibility and safety. We feel that including Goltz Avenue and surrounding streets in the “Heart of the Neighborhood” Character Area and Future Land Uses will facilitate this by encouraging mixed-uses that create ground level activation next to the largest existing public space in the neighborhood. We hope that the concerns that we raised are taken seriously as we believe that the location of Goltz Avenue and surrounding streets will fit well within the purpose statements of Salt Lake City Transit Areas and that their inclusion will facilitate mixed-use development that will enhance precious Ballpark neighborhood public land and accommodate a growing population in a place that is close to transit as well as other amenities. Best regards, Jake Billitteri & the TAG SLC Team https://www.abc4.com/news/local-news/residents-question-crime-at-slc-parks/ https://www.fox13now.com/news/local-news/slc-park-has-become-nightmare-with- dangerous-crime-neighbors-say From:Roo To:Larsen, Nannette Subject:(EXTERNAL) ballpark plan Date:Friday, February 4, 2022 7:38:06 PM Hi Nannette - these are purely my opinions as a resident. 1. festival street. I don’t think we need another festival street, at least not yet. we have yet to see how 300 S (500-600 W) plays out; we already have Edison St.; and our true festival streetis between the City & County Building and the Library. 2. My primary destinations in this area. First, in order of frequency: Lowes TargetLucky 13 Ballpark TRAX station (usually alighting rather than boarding) Second, in order of preference: Lucky 13Lowes (they have better garden section than Home Depot) Ballpark TRAXTarget 3. West Temple is valuable to me because when I get off TRAX at 1300 South, it is the nicest road to ride my bicycle south to connect to Parley’s Trail. I appreciate the trees. I don’t rideon Main Street, despite the bike lanes, because it is too wide, too barren, and, in the summer, too hot. I hope any festival street action will not disrupt this. Although Central Pointe Station is closer to Parley’s Trail, the connection is more clunky. 4. Apartment buildings need PUBLIC ACCESS ground level retail or restaurants, not justactivity centers and gyms for residents. If Ballpark needs destinations, these are the destinations. 5. Walmart and Lowes, in true cities, can be those ground level retail establishments, withparking garages and apartments above. I know this is not their preferred building form, but they can and will do it in locations (or countries) that demand it. It might sound weird, but Ihope we can keep Lowes in Salt Lake. I like shopping in Salt Lake because I know that a percentage of sales tax goes to Salt Lake City. I try to shop in Salt Lake City instead ofMillcreek or South Salt Lake. Thanks for considering my comments. Becka Roolf 563 E Elm Ave From:Kelsey Maas To:City Council Liaisons; Larsen, Nannette Subject:(EXTERNAL) Ballpark Resident Comments Date:Tuesday, December 14, 2021 9:37:58 AM Attachments:image.png image.png Hello, My partner and I live in District 5 on South Jefferson. The other day on a walk we clockedhow truly odd this pedestrian crossing thing is on South Jefferson & Goltz (I put a screenshot). I got an email today about the Ballpark Plan which I'll be reading more on, but what jumpedout to me was the 'pinpricks' of green. My partner and I thought wouldn't it be fun if this odd traffic-island-triangle thing was a tiny park instead of more pavement on top of existingpavement. I'm not sure if you are familiar with Mill Ends Park in Portland - its the smallest park in the world - so a bigger than that, but something that is fun. Also, as a side note I wanted to say that we love Ballpark. There are hidden gems ofrestaurants, global groceries, bakeries and breweries that would be tragic if they got pushed out due to rising rents. On that same note, we love living here, because we actually have aporch and small back garden - access to the outside - which we can't afford really elsewhere in the city. In short, we don't live in a studio or one bedroom 'luxury apartment' that crams you insmall space with little to no access to being able to sit outside for a lot of money. Please, please be thoughtful in how density is added. We understand its needed, but let's not buildfuture slums, but future homes. Thanks for your time!image.png nnage.png Kelsey Kelsey Maas World Heritage Studies, M.A. Preservation Utah I Salt Lake City, UT Ljnkedln I Pronouns: she, her, hers From:jody ellis To:Larsen, Nannette Subject:(EXTERNAL) Ballpark Station and Planning Date:Thursday, December 30, 2021 8:12:27 AM Hello Nannette, I have some questions and concerns regarding changes around the ballpark trax station. Iunderstand change is needed. We need better and safer pedestrian access. I live on Lucy Ave between 200W and W Temple. It's a nice quiet street with good neighbors that watch out for each other. I'm not sure if I misunderstand that the plan is to have moreaccess from trax to Lucy Ave. I can see access from Lucy from the west but please not more pedestrian traffic east of the trax. This is a residential area. I have used public transportationin many cities and we don't leave the station and walk through a neighborhood. There needs to be a safe walkway from the station to W Temple. The 1300 South sidewalk is too narrow. Could a sidewalk large enough for 2 way pedestrian traffic and bike lanes beplaced along the north side of the trax parking lot and behind the Indian center and the 7Eleven. With a nice crosswalk across W Temple. Then eliminate the crosswalk by Lucy andpedestrian traffic down Lucy. With the homeless and Horizante traffic walking down our street many of us don't feel safe in our front yards. They walk down the street dropping trash, swearing... the dogs in theneighborhood bark at them, as they should because they are protecting their property. One of my neighbors said he thought there was something mentioned about using the alleys for pedestrian and bike traffic. I have a 2 car garage in the alley that we use daily. When I'mdriving down the alley and there is someone walking I have to wait for them to move over so it is safe for me to pass them. My neighbor and I feel the alley is way to narrow for any type ofpedestrian traffic. Besides at this time I wouldn't feel safe walking down the alley. All summer we had a homeless man camped by our neighbors garage. Many times when I leave or comehome I need to ask people to move off my garage apron. Other neighbors have the same problem. Our alley is a mess and not a safe place. I look forward to making our neighborhood a better place. Sincerely, Jody Ellis From:Kirk Huffaker To:Larsen, Nannette Subject:(EXTERNAL) Ballpark Station Area Plan Comments Date:Monday, December 6, 2021 7:40:06 PM Hi Nannette, Please include the following as a public comment on the draft BSAP. I was surprised to read through the entire report and see a small single mention ofthe historic character of the district. In addition, the citywide Historic PreservationPlan is not referenced once as one of the guiding documents that was or should beconsidered. I believe both of these are very negative omissions for the plan and thecity at large. While the area has not been formally surveyed, approximately 343 buildings havebeen identified within the neighborhood boundary and are documented in the UtahSHPO database. There is one National Register Historic District, Boulevard Gardens,and zero individually listed structures in the NRHP. However, approximately 105structures have been documented to be eligible for listing in the NRHP, includingmany within the station plan boundary. So there is definitely potential fordocumentation and preservation of historic character throughout the neighborhood. In addition, there are already strong historic preservation financial incentives in placefor preservation, including several from the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake Citythat can be used in addition to state and federal incentives. The public, propertyowners, and developers are missing opportunities if city plans do not highlight theseavailable options. Without foresight within plans such as Ballpark, more significant buildings will meetthe same fate as the Sarah Quayle Cook House at 1706 S. West Temple - demolition.It is my sincere hope that the plan team will revisit the plan to incorporate morehistoric preservation information by utilizing historic building data and the SLCHistoric Preservation Plan to integrate these allied planning programs andphilosophies into this community plan. Best Regards,Kirk Kirk Huffaker, PrincipalKirk Huffaker Preservation StrategiesSalt Lake City, Utah www.kirkhuffaker.com- Pronouns: He / His / Him / Mr. - *Please note my new email address: From:James Alfandre To:Larsen, Nannette Subject:(EXTERNAL) Ballpark Station Area Plan Date:Monday, December 20, 2021 6:55:06 PM Nannette, I would like to submit a comment of support for the Ballpark Station Area Plan. My companyhas one completed project and three more projects in this neighborhood and are very active in creating urban, vibrant, well-designed projects that add missing-middle and other neededhousing. I like the vision of more density and activation around the Ballpark and TRAX stop and throughout the neighborhood in appropriate locations such as the main corridors of MainStreet. This plan will set the tone for future growth and activation in this neighborhood that will create a more liveable, vibrant and safe place to be. I would add that the proper zoning should be implemented as soon as possible to help thePlan's vision become a reality, incentive developers to design great urbanism that creates walkable, vibrant streets, and reduces the amount of application workload on the PlanningStaff. Best,James Alfandre -- James Alfandre Managing Partner | Urban Alfandre www.urbanalfandre.com From:Meredith Bunsawat To:Larsen, Nannette Subject:(EXTERNAL) Ballpark Station Area Plan Date:Thursday, December 2, 2021 2:11:56 PM Hello, Just wanted to say that as residents and homeowners in the Ballpark neighborhood, my partner and I are excited about this plan! The neighborhood is very central located to many locallyowned businesses and I think it would boost their businesses to add more types of housing and attractions to the neighborhood. We also think it would be best if the Main Street Motel were bought out and transformed intosomething that has a positive impact on the neighborhood. As you probably know, it has long been known for being a major source of crime in the neighborhood. Thank you for your efforts! Best,Meredith From:Paul Svendsen To:Larsen, Nannette Cc:Ballpark; Stephen Alfandre; James Alfandre; Oktay, Michaela Subject:(EXTERNAL) Ballpark Station Area Plan Date:Thursday, December 9, 2021 10:39:49 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Nannette, I would like to submit comments regarding the proposed Ballpark Station Area Plan. I have done several developments in the project area and currently own 5 properties that will beimpacted by the proposed changes. I am very interested in seeing how the plan is implemented. One of the Plan’s strategies is to “update the City’s zoning code and map, as appropriate, toimplement the provisions of this plan.” I really hope SLC takes this seriously and is willing to experiment with some changes to see if they encourage desirable development. To that end, I strongly support the proposal to expand the South Stare Street Corridor Overlayto include the west side of Main Street. The character of the street is the same on both sides and there is no reason they should be subject to different zoning regulations. The west side ofMain Street has incredible potential that is being constrained by the current zoning and expanding the SSSC would help a lot. I would also suggest the following modifications to properties zoned CC within the SouthState Street Corridor Overlay: No minimum lot area (to encourage missing middle and affordable housing development like tiny houses, townhouses, etc.). No minimum lot width (same reason). Clarify that structures within the SSSC and the CC zone are exempted from theminimum front yard and corner side yard requirements. Currently the ordinance is unclear and the ordinance seems to be applied differently depending on which staffer isassigned to the project. Increase maximum height to 35’ to permit taller ceilings, roof decks, and even 4 stories with one partially sub-grade garden level (as was done at the Row 17 development withgreat results). Allow more than one principal building per lot regardless of street frontage. This will permit desirable types of residential development that are well established in otherlocations, such as two homes on a single lot. Allow the following uses: ** Single family attached (so that townhomes can be built without going through the condominium process, which makes obtaining financing more difficult and costly forprospective homeowners) ** Single family detached (tiny homes, etc.) ** SRO (another affordable housing strategy) ** Twin home (the twin home fonn works well in this area) ** Two family (same as above) Again, I am suggesting that these changes would only be applicable to prope1iies in the SSSC and zoned CC. The proposed changes would have a ve1y discrete application, and can easily be evaluated to see if they result in desirable development. Thanks for yow-consideration. Best regards, Paul Paul Svendsen / Realtor® WINDERMERE REAL ESTATE -UTAH From:Matt Haydon To:Larsen, Nannette Subject:(EXTERNAL) Ballpark Station Plan Date:Tuesday, December 7, 2021 10:45:17 AM Nannette, You mentioned in the email to me that this was a 20 year plan. But this goes against what issaid on page 44 of the plan. "Amend Section 21A.26.078: TSA Transit Station Area District of the Salt Lake CityMunicipal Code to include the Ballpark Station Area as one of the existing TSA districts or create a new one if needed. This may include requiring activation of the 1300 Southfrontage with restaurants, shops, street furniture and trees, implementing streetscape improvements to accommodate pedestrian volumes, allowing heights comparable to heights inother Urban Station Areas, and protect the views of the Wasatch Range from inside Smith’s Ballpark.”Doesn’t this mean that once you get the code changed, that 10-12 story buildings would be approved immediately? This would be a major change in the community and have asignificant impact on the infrastructure and living conditions. Where are these other “Urban Station Areas?” Are you referring to downtown? Where are these shops and restaurants goingto be placed? From State St to 3rd West is pretty full. Moreover, you did not address the inconsistencies of the plan when it states there is a need for single family homes. You did not address my infrastructure concerns. I noticed while drivingmy daughter to school today that there was an RV and two cars that look as if people were living in them on one of our streets. Nothing has been done to either move these people alongor ticket them. The local park is not safe enough for people to bring their kids or dogs. I have had several neighbors stalked by people from the park. The driveway on our property in athroughway for people, we have had multiple incidents with the homeless here; theft, human excrement, and threats to people. We have begged the city to allow us to fence our driveway,but we have had NO support from our city councilman. He actually said in a meeting with our community that he would fight against it. He also claims the quality of life issues should beaccepted because that is part of the urban lifestyle. NO, he is wrong and it is this attitude by the city government that is causing the issue. We should be able to walk to our mailboxwithout being accosted by the homeless. You mention that you want to encourage ridership on Trax. But also mention that you have had negative experiences, isn’t that an indication of an issue? Why would riders want to puttheir safety at risk? Would you want your children, if you have them, exposed to these risks? You mentioned nothing about the parking issue. So many of the recent projects have used thecarveout allowing for few parking spaces, is this going to be the same? What about all the other projects that are scheduled for this area? Does the 20 year plan accommodate for theseprojects? What about security for the neighborhood? We have the highest crime rate in the city and the highest murder rate. What is going to be done about the drugs in our neighborhood? Theseconcerns need to be addressed. Finally, these meetings should not take place on Zoom anymore. We are at a point that anyone who wants the vaccine can get it or have natural immunities. People can wear masksif they are uncomfortable. Zoom does not allow for real interaction. People can be muted and ignored. Matt Haydon From:Matt To:Larsen, Nannette Subject:(EXTERNAL) Station Area Plan Date:Monday, December 6, 2021 2:06:28 PM Ms. Larsen, I live in the Ballpark community and I am against a manor part of the plan. While I am happy to see this area being targeted for revitalization, I am against the idea of a 120 foot variance. In the plan it says that there is a need for single family homes the solution is to build apartments? That sounds like an error, you can have one or the other, but not both. This community is constantly having high density housing built within its boarders. The rest of the city needs to help with the density issue. Another issue I have is the anti-car stance that city projects are adapting. The public transit system is not good enough. It is unrealistic to assume that people will use Trax to take kids to school, go grocery shopping, or other daily shopping. There is a serious issue with safety on Trax, the stations are not safe and riding on the trains is not safe. This is the exact reason we have stopped taking Trax. My wife used to take it everyday, but the station was being used as a homeless camp/shelter and she was being harassed on a daily basis. Trax police officers tried their best but since the homeless are allowed to ride for free in areas it seems like a lost cause. We had to buy an additional car as a result. The idea of taking my daughter on Trax and possibly exposing her to this is unthinkable. Based on our experience I don’t think it is reasonable to ask people to take Trax with kids and groceries. Finally, I have a serious issues with infrastructure. The local infrastructure cannot handle an additional four or five hundred people and their cars. Traffic on game day is terrible and our community is overwhelmed with cars. We lose all of our street parking and when we call parking enforcement, nothing is done. Our community already has people living out of their cars and rvs, and the city government does nothing to help. Are these structures going to have enough parking? Or are they going to take advantage of the the carve out the city council and planning commission gives if the building is close to a trax station? If they are the streets will be even more crowded, creating a parking and safety issue. And let’s not forget the potential for crime. We are already being told to leave nothing in our cars, now our trash cans are being emptied out by the homeless on a daily basis. What about security? Is there going to be a police sub-station? We were promised an increase in patrols and security when the homeless resource center was opened and we have to fight to get a cop out here. Many in my community and neighborhood are against the idea of a 120 foot tall building. If you want to build single family homes, go for it. Keep additional apartment buildings out of Ballpark, we have done our fair share, it is time other areas in the city do theirs. If you would like to discuss this issue further and with members of our community (Rowhaus) please contact me. Best, Matt Haydon Sent from my iPhone From:george chapman To:Larsen, Nannette Cc:Norris, Nick Subject:(EXTERNAL) Comments on Ballpark Station Area Plan Draft Date:Friday, December 31, 2021 6:12:19 PM The Draft Plan suggests increasing the density of 1300 South (a street that is already maxedout) and allow buildings 120 feet high. But it also recommends pedestrian amenities to encourage walkability. But SLC RDA/Council approved a loan to a development on 1300South that restricts the sidewalk to a micro sidewalk next to 35MPH traffic! Any building higher that 2 stories should provide 10 foot sidewalks! Lights, trees and other obstacles thatmay restrict safe bicycling and pedestrian travel should be minimized. It also, appropriately recommends opening up the street just north and west of the 1300 SouthTRAX Station (Lucy Ave) to allow access to 300 West. But it may take years to open up and the Plan also suggests using the UTA parking lots, which are usually full and have been acrime magnet, for building Transit Oriented Development buildings. In other areas where parking lots are used for TODs, parking garages are proposed. Parking garages in Utah have acomplicated reputation. Ogden's parking garages were so uncomfortable that they led to the downfall of the Downtown Ogden Mall. The proposal also suggests putting several pedestrian crossings on 1300 South (so the proposed 1300 South eastbound bus doesn't have to cross the street). But that would slowtraffic and increase pollution. It is also very unsafe. Putting a pedestrian crossing close to a crossing arm for a train crossing is complicated. If there is room for a couple of cars before thearm, the pedestrian crossing becomes a threat to pedestrians. One pedestrian crossing is necessary now since the RDA approved project on 1300 South destroys walkability on thenorth side of 1300 South going to 300 West. The crossing should be next to and west of the TRAX crossing arms and coordinated with that system. The plan appears to put in bicycle sharrows in two of the four lanes of 1300 South which also will increase pollution since the 1300 South road traffic is already maxed out with four lanes.It suggests studying eliminating 1300 South traffic lanes! The City plan also proposes a center median which doesn't make sense in a desert and drought area. Several years ago, the Citystopped watering medians. The sidewalks need widening more than the median. The proposal also recommends high density apartments in the parking lots of UTA and Cityowned Ballpark. The City RDA is recommended to force the changes and increased development. The proposal does recommend more green space and parks but the City isignoring the best potential for park, the Fleet Block. A library is recommended and is a good idea. The Plan recommends changing the 1300 South TRAX area to TSA Station Area with a result of no parking requirements. Although it recommends protecting the "viewshed of theWasatch Range from inside Smith's Ballpark". But the priority should be to protect the viewshed of residents! The Plan suggests much higher density development but refuses torequire wider sidewalks that can accomodate bicycles and pedestrians and does not decrease vehicle availability. It also recommends mid-block crossings that will increase pollution andprobably require 20MPH like downtown. The goal is to: "Create a dense urban environment and entertainment zone around theBallpark." I do not think that it will increase safety for bicyclists and pedestrians. Sugar House supergentrification significantly reduced pedestrian and bicycle safety despite many newcrossing lights on 2100 South. The plan suggests burying power lines which historically has been very expensive (butnecessary with high rises next to the lines). The City should not pay for the burying. Private developers should pay. Personally, I believe that the money could be better spent on wider sidewalks which would place the buildings appropriately further away from the power lines.Central 9th RDA project spent millions on burying lines with minimal effect. The Plan recommends "Implement a district-parking strategy that utilizes unused areaparking and parking garages for game days to minimize the need for parking fields in the area." That could include paid parking in the area that already does not have enough parking. The 1400 South TRAX crossing is a problem for UTA. It would be costly and a safety nightmare. These are high speed trains and the area has too many homeless who are supposedto stay off the tracks. Allowing a crossing at 1400 South makes it too easy to be on the tracks. UTA should deny it. The same with the Paramount Ave crossing. Pedestrian furniture, although nice to have, especially at bus stops, would create obstacles for shared pedestrian and bicycle use on sidewalks and attract so called undesirables loitering.Homeless have a tendency of hanging out in the area. Trees should not decrease the sidewalk width. Wider sidewalks are better than trees in park strips. Trees belong where they will bewatered, in yards. The Plan recommends "Elimination of “blind corners” or areas" but the City and Planrecommends building to the corner next to skinny sidewalks which are perfect for blind corners. (see construction on 2100 South). Buildings at corners should be well set back forwider sidewalks. The rail line from 1300 South to 400 West should be a linear park, not a TRAX. The localtaxpayer cost would be better invested in a linear park and Fleet Block Park. The local cost of the proposed TRAX to 400 West is $100 million. What does the community want for that$100 million? The 1700 South TRAX station would completely change TRAX (with the 650S station) intoa milkrun. That is not conducive to increasing transit use. More attention should be focused on eliminating car dealerships which destroy anywalkability. The 9th South Viaduct is an important traffic corridor, which if eliminated, would increasepollution in the area. The area around 900 South and to the north is increasing density significantly. George Chapman 1186S 1100ESLC I am in support of increased density in the entire heart of the neighborhood; however, I do have concerns and problems with the proposed language for the West Temple Character Zone. I go into more detail on this below. West Temple Character District: “New development should maintain the current character and scale of the area” This yellow line defined as the “West Temple Character Zone” bisects the heart of the neighborhood proposed area. It makes no sense and I do not know what character they are even talking about preserving. This stretch of west temple It’s a hodgepodge of uses and scale (pictures and examples below) where the very few single family homes look out of place. As the owner of one of those 6 houses (corner of Lucy and West Temple), I say forget that. Let this whole area be included in a higher and better density proposed for the heart of the neighborhood. The way the plan currently reads is that potentially 120 foot buildings could go into the blue areas defined as the heart of the neighborhood, while the property I own would be stuck as a small single family home with a back yard all in the name of preserving some kind of undefined character. My property could potentially be surrounded by new uses and density while these old homes are just left in some arbitrary lower density assignment. I am all for added density, my concern is that everyone else will get the benefit of added density while my property which has an existing front door facing west temple (entire south side of property is on lucy) will be forced to stay low density. The plan would basically exclude a handful of property owners from the added benefits while the city builds a huge building across the street. Let us be included in the upzoning, and don’t leave us in the early 1900s when these houses were built as kit homes. I think my property would be a great spot in the urban core for higher density housing options. Its proximity to Trax, and 1300 south makes it a prime candidate. It would be a shame and not make sense if this must stay a small 2-bedroom single-family home, where many new units could be placed in an urban core, in the name of preserving some perceived character zone while the adjacent properties get the benefit and best use of the heart of the neighborhood zone. I think it would be a great spot for infill of duplex/twin homes, micro units, row housing, or even someday a commercial space to support the area (like a bike and coffee shop). This home is unreinforced masonry and adds no significant character to the neighborhood. It will most likely be torn down regardless of zoning changes in the near future. Would the city like to see higher density with multiple living units or commercial, or just keep a small house with a backyard. Again, as an owner of one of the few single-family homes on this stretch, I say forget that. Let them be included in a higher and better density. Pictures of West Temple with notes Is this the character that the plan wants to preserve? Half of the homes around here are in disrepair and don’t add any real significant historical importance to the area. They could be incorporated into the up- zoning and in my opinion are not even close to a best use for an area that is right nest to mass transit, is easily bikeable, close to amenities, and is perfect for higher and better density and use. From:Jessa Tuminez To:Larsen, Nannette Cc:Lindquist, Kelsey Subject:Re: (EXTERNAL) Request for Ballpark Station Area Plan Date:Monday, November 29, 2021 4:55:12 PM Attachments:image003.pngimage004.png Thanks Nannette! Let me know once you have reviewed and discussed my comments with relevant parties. Would you be the final decision maker or would that be the GSBSconsultants? I do feel strongly that my proposed change is more in line with the broad goals outlined in the Ballpark Station Area Plan and would serve to re-activate the area better, butI'm open to hearing and understanding the other side if there's disagreement or we choose not to modify the plan. Appreciate any updates you can give me. Thanks,Jessa Tuminez Jessa On Mon, Nov 22, 2021, 11:11 PM Jessa Tuminez <tuminez.j@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Nanette, I appreciate your clarification, thank you! I have a couple questions/comments: 1.Was there a particular reason the city chose to draw the line between Paxton rather than keeping the street uniformed in zoning?2. I’d like to propose a change in the draft plan to include the north end of Paxton in the high density zoning. I think this makes sense given: The north and south side share many characteristics currently (ex. both streets have rental properties) and will share characteristics in the future such as theproposed bike route, being transit oriented, and having significant redevelopment opportunitiesAdditionally, with the very under-utilized alleyway just north of Paxton street (boxed red in attached screenshot), I feel that this alley or Fremont Ave (withthe park in front of it) would be the least intrusive to the neighborhood and would be a better line to delineate medium density from high density zoning I appreciate you taking my comments. I'm happy to talk through this in person or on the phone, if helpful. Just let me know. Thanks, Jessa Tuminez Proposed Future Land Use Map Incompatible with Surrounding Uses: Highlighted area has 3 older SFH's in between two large, high density apartment complexes. My house awkwardly sits 5 feet from a 6 story apartment complex.1/2 block to the east, apartment complexes being developed on small lots that are the same size as mine. Directly across the street is the future home of an approved 500+ unit affordable/market housingproject. The land in front of the 500+ unit development is currently being marketed for sale as another multi-family development site. A few months ago I had a DRC meeting with the planning department about this very issue. They agreed withmy assessment that the current zoning and layout was "poor urban planning" and that the neighborhood wouldbenefit from a change. However, they explained that the process to change the current future land use map wouldlikely take 18+months. I was told that TSA or FB-UNC 2 zoning would be more appropriate and wouldbetter conform to the surrounding uses. I am hopeful that this small neighborhood plan offers a quicker pathto updating the future land use map to a more neighborhood compatible zoning designation. Here is the info on my property: Property Address: 1055 South 200 West Current Zoning: RM-35 Proposed Plan Zoning: Medium Density Neighbor's addresses: 1049 S 200 W and 1039-1045 S W What are your thoughts on my proposal to update the plan to address this oversight? I'd love to hear yourfeedback/concerns. I would also be curious to hear what you would recommend for next steps. Is it possible toloop in the planning department as they are already aware of this situation? Thanks, Amy! On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 9:13 AM Marcus Lonardo <marcuslonardo10@gmail.com> wrote: From: Marcus Lonardo <marcuslonardo10@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2021 11:48 PMTo: Anderson, John <John.Anderson@slcgov.com>; Lundmark, Susan <Susan.Lundmark@slcgov.com>Subject: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: Ballpark Improvement Plan Hello John and Susan, I was referred to you both by Amy Hawkins. (See forwarded email thread). I understand that you aremanaging the creation of the Ballpark Station Area Plan. I have reviewed the draft plan in detail and am veryimpressed with your forward thinking vision for the neighborhood. I believe there are a few small, butimportant, tweaks that can be made to improve the plan. Is there still time for changes to be made? I would like have a discussion with the team responsible for ultimately finalizing the plan. Would either ofyou, or anyone on the plan creation team, be free for a 15 minute phone call? If helpful, I can detail my notesin a concise email. Please advise me on the best way to make mine and my neighbor's voice's heard. There are so many partiesinvolved in the creation of the plan that it is difficult to identify the best people to speak with. Any advicewould be greatly appreciated. Thank you! -Marcus ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Amy J. Hawkins <amy.j hawkins@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 2:02 PMSubject: Re: Ballpark Improvement PlanTo: Marcus Lonardo <marcuslonardo10@gmail.com>Cc: Paul Johnson <pjslc@yahoo.com>, Jesse Hulse <jesse@atlasarchitects.com> Sure, Marcus. I reached out to Susan Lundmark for her advice and this is what she suggested: To: Lundmark, Susan <Susan.Lundmark@slcgov.com>; Annaka Egan <aegan@gsbsconsulting.com>;Christine Richman <crichman@gsbsconsulting.com>; Anderson, John <John.Anderson@slcgov.com>Subject: (EXTERNAL) Re: Ballpark Improvement Plan Hi Susan, Folks like Marcus are starting to send me their feedback on the Ballpark Area Plan. How should I best directtheir comments? I don't want considered feedback like this to be lost. According to what I see on the areaplan website, it doesn't seem like the public comment period has officially begun yet. Is that right? "The Planning Division of the City will set up community discussions with the focus on gauging communitysupport for the plan. Where there is not support, let’s have a meaningful conversation about why and whatcan be done about it. The official 45-day public comment period for the plan will happen during thistimeframe; check back on this website soon to make comment and/or sign up with your email address toreceive notification of the public comment period." *** Hi Amy, Thanks very much for reaching out and I’m glad to hear that community members are reading through thePlan and considering their feedback. My understanding is the 45-day comment period is not open quite yet. Until that time, I think it would probably be helpful to suggest that community members considerdocumenting their feedback in one location (as Marcus has done in his email below) and enter their emailaddress at the Plan website: https://www.slc.gov/planning/master-plans/ballparkplan/ With their email entered on that website, those community members will be notified directly when thecomment period opens, and they can send their documented feedback directly to SLC Planning Division aspart of the official Plan adoption process. Or, if they prefer, they can email their comments to John Anderson at john.anderson@slcgov.com John’s team will be managing the Plan adoption process and John can forward those emails to theappropriate planner once the official comment period opens. I hope that helps! Please let me know if you have other questions or if I can help in other ways. Thanks, Susan On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 1:23 PM Marcus Lonardo <marcuslonardo10@gmail.com> wrote: Thank you all for your feedback! I am in no rush but want to get my feedback incorporated in the Ballpark Area Masterplan, if possible. Is there a point of contact, who is heading up community outreach for the plan, I can be put in contactwith? I saw that GSBS was contracted to advise on the plan. Can I be put in contact with theirrepresentative? Thank you, Marcus On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 3:44 PM Marcus Lonardo <marcuslonardo10@gmail.com> wrote: Thank you all for your feedback! I am in no rush but want to get my feedback incorporated in the Ballpark Area Masterplan, if possible. Is there a point of contact, who is heading up community outreach for the plan, I can be put in contactwith? I saw that GSBS was contracted to advise on the plan. Can I be put in contact with theirrepresentative? Thank you, Marcus On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 7:46 PM <pjslc@yahoo.com> wrote: I must defer to Jesse’s professional expertise. The lot owners who wish for the change may do so ontheir own but there will be a financial cost. Planning (zoning@slcgov.com) can give you the specifics.The Ballpark plan may include some rezoning, but it certainly won’t move forward at a quick pace ifthat’s what you’re looking for. Though it’s unlikely you need to be concerned about zoning becomingless friendly to density in your neighborhood, so you might want to do a little wait and see. PersonallyI would only pursue a zoning change if I was planning to attempt a development on my own. Regards, Paul Paul Johnson Chair, Central 9th Community Council From: Jesse Hulse <jesse@atlasarchitects.com> Sent: Friday, November 5, 2021 3:40 PMTo: Marcus Lonardo <marcuslonardo10@gmail.com>Cc: Amy J. Hawkins <amy.j hawkins@gmail.com>; Paul Johnson <pjslc@yahoo.com>Subject: Re: Ballpark Improvement Plan I think whether you pursue a rezone along the traditional route, or you hope the city does as part oftheir ballpark plan, the process will be the same, but it could take a lot longer if you wait for the City. If you want to pursue it for all 3 lots, you would need your neighbors to participate and just work withPlanning to go through the process. The other option is to lobby the Administration, City Council, Planning Dept to make it part of theBallpark plan to rezone Jesse J Hulse Principal, Atlas Architects Inc Vice Chair, Central 9th Community Council From: Marcus Lonardo <marcuslonardo10@gmail.com>Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 4:45 PMTo: Jesse Hulse <jesse@atlasarchitects.com>Cc: Amy J. Hawkins <amy.j hawkins@gmail.com>, Paul Johnson <pjslc@yahoo.com>Subject: Re: Ballpark Improvement Plan Hi Jesse, Thank you for your feedback and thoughts. I'm glad to hear that you think a change in designation tosomething along the lines of TSA or FBUNC makes sense given the circumstances. Paul, I would be curious to hear your feedback as well. What do you all recommend as the next step? I want to do my best to push this concept to theneighborhood/planning department so that it can be incorporated into the final plan. I am notvery familiar with the small area plan process and want to make sure I follow the proper steps andspeak to the right people. Thank you all for your help and guidance. -Marcus On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 1:31 PM Jesse Hulse <jesse@atlasarchitects.com> wrote: In that case then yes, I would agree that even with their inherent faults, (which C9CC is pushing tocorrect) TSA or FB would make sense to allow for larger multi-family projects here. The existing RMF-35 isn’t bad though, it would allow for 3 story town home development likeRowhaus to the South which would also feel in character and scale or 3 story multifamilyapartment. Some variation in height along a street is nice so that the street face doesn’t feel relentless andoffers some extra opportunity for view and daylight to residents or passersby. My two cents. Jesse J Hulse Principal, Atlas Architects Inc Vice Chair, Central 9th Community Council From: Marcus Lonardo <marcuslonardo10@gmail.com>Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 11:54 AMTo: Jesse Hulse <jesse@atlasarchitects.com>Cc: Amy J. Hawkins <amy.j.hawkins@gmail.com>, Paul Johnson <pjslc@yahoo.com>Subject: Re: Ballpark Improvement Plan Hi Jesse, Please let me know how I can be of help in applying pressure to make sure they follow through onthe zoning changes. I strongly oppose preserving the existing character of the 3 parcels in question on the proposedBallpark small area plan. My house is literally 5ft from a 6 story apartment complex. (have you seen the movie Up? ha!) I am in favor of amending the proposed plan for these parcels to a future land use zoning designation that better conforms to the sun-ounding uses. S1mounding uses: 2 Large high density apartments on either side. 500+ units going in directly across the street +additional land across the street being marketed for sale as another high density apartment site. We are literally swrnunded. We are a forgotten small island of SFH's in a sea of high density multi family-yet we still only have RMF-35 zoning and fall into the "medium density" designation on the proposed plan. TSA zoning is suggested one block south. I think the medium zoning designation for these three parcels ( or whole block) ,on the proposed plan, is an oversight. I had a DRC meeting with the city a few months back. They strongly agreed the cwTent layout is an example of poor urban planning. They recollllllended I pursue a rezone to FB-UNC 2 or TSA. They also recollllllended I reach out to the community council for fe.edback. They said a rezone process would take 18+ months and that you essentially need to be a RE developer. I am hopeful this small area plan can provide a quicker path to a more reasonable future land use designation. I only own one of the homes. My neighbors and I have serious concems about our long term property values being dramatically impared by the lack of conformity with the neighborhood. Do you see where I'm coming from? What are your thoughts/concems? Thank you, All! -Marcus On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 11:25 AM Jesse Hulse <jesse@atlasarchitects.com> wrote: Hi Marcus, Nice to meet you, I’m really glad that our efforts appeared to pay off – however we are going tohave to keep after them to make sure they follow through on the zoning changes. What are you hoping to accomplish with a rezone, are you wanting to get your property andmaybe the two neighbors rezoned, so they can be redeveloped into something denser like the twoapartments on either side, or are you trying to preserve the character of those 3 existingproperties? Jesse J Hulse Principal, Atlas Architects Inc Vice Chair, Central 9th Community Council From: Marcus Lonardo <marcuslonardo10@gmail.com>Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 10:51 AMTo: Amy J. Hawkins <amy.j hawkins@gmail.com>Cc: Paul Johnson <pjslc@yahoo.com>, Jesse Hulse <jesse@atlasarchitects.com>Subject: Re: Ballpark Improvement Plan Amy, thank you for the introduction and excellent synopsis. Hi Paul and Jesse, See my initial email to Amy for greater context. I look forward to connecting and identifying anappropriate future land use zone for the identified strip of land. On another note- you all were incredible in helping voice our neighborhood's concerns with theproposed homeless shelter around the corner. Great work! I I Thank you! -Marcus Lonardo Hi Amy, Thank you for sharing. I generally really like the plan and think it will help accommodate the necessa1y growth and changes our neighborhood will experience over the next 1 O+ years. I would like to point out one po1tion of the proposed map that I think could be improved upon. I I I own a home at 1055 S 200 W that sits in between two large apartment complexes. My house is awkwardly 5 feet from C9 Flats, a six story apartment complex. There is another large apartment complex a few doors down. See image below: The proposed plan does not materially change the zoning designation for this awkward strip ofhighlighted land that includes my home (see above in yellow). I think this is because the homesin this strip barely fall outside of the 1/4 mile trax diameter. These homes are roughly 0.3 milesfrom both trax stops and still idea for a transit oriented development. Proposed Future Land Use Map Incompatible with Surrounding Uses: · Highlighted area has 3 older SFH's in between two large, high densityapartment complexes. · My house awkwardly sits 5 feet from a 6 story apartment complex. · 1/2 block to the east, apartment complexes being developed on small lots that are thesame size as mine. · Directly across the street is the future home of an approved 500+ unit affordable/market housing project. · The land in front of the 500+ unit development is currently being marketed for sale asanother multi-family development site. A few months ago I had a DRC meeting with the planning department about this very issue.They agreed with my assessment that the current zoning and layout was "poor urban planning"and that the neighborhood would benefit from a change. However, they explained that theprocess to change the current future land use map would likely take 18+months. I was told thatTSA or FB-UNC 2 zoning would be more appropriate and would better conform to the surrounding uses. I am hopeful that this small neighborhood plan offers a quicker path toupdating the future land use map to a more neighborhood compatible zoning designation. Here is the info on my property: Property Address: 1055 South 200 West Current Zoning: RM-35 Proposed Plan Zoning: Medium Density Neighbor's addresses: 1049 S 200 W and 1039-1045 S W What are your thoughts on my proposal to update the plan to address this oversight? I'd love tohear your feedback/concerns. I would also be curious to hear what you would recommend fornext steps. Is it possible to loop in the planning department as they are already aware of thissituation? Thanks, Amy! On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 10:34 AM Amy J. Hawkins <amy.j.hawkins@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Paul and Jesse, Marcus Lonardo reached out to me because he lives about a block south of Central 9th in ahome at 1055 South 200 West. He's looking to change the zoning of his property (currently hisblock includes 3 100+ year old homes adjacent to high density apartments on three sides) andthinks that this could be meaningful feedback to include in the Ballpark Area Plan. I agree!However, he's been advised that Form-Based 2 zoning or TSA zoning would be good optionsfor his home. By both of our limited understanding this would match the "heart of theneighborhood" zoning designation that is proposed one block away. Could we help give him some feedback about how Form-Based Zoning has worked out for theCentral 9th neighborhood and what kinds of zoning might make sense for his block? Best regards, Amy On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 3:13 PM Marcus Lonardo <marcuslonardo10@gmail.com> wrote: From:Lundmark, Susan To:mcgonigle.julia@gmail.com Cc:Lyons, Amy; Larsen, Nannette Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) SLC Bikeways Date:Wednesday, November 24, 2021 2:53:28 PM Hi Julia, I apologize for the delayed reply and thank you for the suggestion you sent to SLC Transportation Division. I was sent your email because I have been the City’s project manager for creating the Ballpark Station Area Plan, which is a transportation and land use plan in the direct vicinity of the Ballpark TRAX station and Smith’s Ballpark (where the Bees play). If you are interested, a public review draft of the Plan is available here, and there is also a place to enter your email to receive updates: https://www.slc.gov/planning/master-plans/ballparkplan/ The Plan is now going through the City’s official plan adoption process, including a public outreach and comment period. This step is being led by Nannette Larsen in SLC Planning Division, who is copied here so she can include your comment in the consideration of the draft plan. Just so you know, right now there is a recommendation in the draft Plan to further study the possibility re-allocating roadway space and/or reducing the number of vehicle travel lanes on 1300 South between State Street and 300 West to allow better bicycle and sidewalk options on this stretch. We are not promising that we would be able to do that, but we are recommending that we study it further to see what the options may be. I hope this helps! Please reach out to me or Nannette with any other questions. Thank you, Susan SUSAN LUNDMARK (pronouns: she/her) Project Manager, Transportation Planner Transportation Division DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION TEL 801-535-6112 EMAIL susan.lundmark@slcgov.com www.slc.gov/transportation www.ourneighborhoodscan.com From: Julia McGonigle <mcgonigle.julia@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 11:10 AM To: Transportation <transportation@slcgov.com> Subject: (EXTERNAL) SLC Bikeways I see SLC is undergoing a lot of bike infrastructure planning for the next few years. Awesome! Happy to pay taxes to make that happen. I wish you would, in the meantime, connect the bike lane on 1300S between State and ~3rd/4th west. Currently the bike lane on 13th south just dumps you onto State Street with no bike friendly option other than diverting up to 900S or down to 1700S, which is a pretty far jump on the traffic heavy State Street. 1300S needs the bike lane extended to at least Main Street ASAP, but preferably just connect it all the way through as it is on 9th and 17th. This would be wonderful and cheap....just a little paint on the road. Your constituents would appreciate this immensely. June 23, 2022 6/23/2022 6/23/2022 RESOLUTION ________ OF 2022 Authorizing approval of Addendum No. 6 and Amendment No. 1 to Addendum No. 3 to an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority providing for transfer and credit of City funds for implementation of the Transit Master Plan. WHEREAS, Utah Code Title 11, Chapter 13, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, Salt Lake City Council authorized the City to enter into an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation (“City”) and Utah Transit Authority (the “Interlocal Agreement”) providing for transfer of City funds for implementation of the Transit Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the Interlocal Agreement contemplated that the parties would enter into an annual addendum to provide funding for the frequent transit network routes and other transit improvements; and WHEREAS, the City previously entered into Addendum No. 3, as authorized by the Salt Lake City Council in January 2021, to extend UTA service along certain routes; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 now requires amending to reflect funding credits owed to the City due to reduced UTA service levels during the term of Addendum No. 3; and WHEREAS, the City now seeks to enter into a sixth addendum to the Interlocal Agreement to provide for the transfer of City funds for the fourth year of transit services, including the addition of Route 1 and the continuation of Routes 2, 9, and 21, pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement; and WHEREAS, a draft amendment and a draft addendum have been prepared to accomplish said purposes. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah as follows: 1. It does hereby approve the execution and delivery of the following: a. Amendment No. 1 to Addendum No. 3 to the Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority, providing for the discounting of City- sponsored transit service reflective of actual costs. b. Addendum No. 6 to the Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority providing for the transfer of City funds for the fourth year of City-sponsored service, including the addition of Route 1 and the continuation of Routes 2, 9, and 21, pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority providing for the transfer of City funds for implementation of the Transit Master Plan. 2. Erin Mendenhall, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah or her designee is hereby authorized to approve, execute, and deliver said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation, in substantially the same form as now before the City Council and attached hereto, subject to such minor changes that do not materially affect the rights and obligations of the City thereunder and as shall be approved by the Mayor, her execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval. PASSED by the City Council of Salt Lake City this day of , 2022. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER HB_ATTY-# APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sara Montoya Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: ___________________ ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 5/11/2022 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 5/11/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 5/11/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Transportation Advisory Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment: Transportation Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Johnnae Nardone as a member of Transporation Advisory Board. ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 May 11, 2022 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Dugan, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to Transportation Advisory Board. Johnnae Nardone - to be appointed for a three year term ending Monday, September 29, 2025 starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 5/11/2022 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 5/11/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 5/11/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Transportation Advisory Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment: Transportation Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Leo Masic as a member of Transporation Advisory Board. ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 May 11, 2022 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Dugan, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to Transportation Advisory Board. Leo Masic - to be appointed for a three year term ending Monday, September 29, 2025 starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 5/26/2022 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 5/26/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 5/26/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Human Rights Commission. STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment: Human Rights Commission RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Olivia A. Jarmillo as a member of the Human Rights Commission. ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 May 26, 2022 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Dugan, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Human Rights Commission. Olivia A. Jaramillo - to be appointed for a four year term ending Monday, December 20, 2026, starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File City Council Announcements July 12, 2022 Information Needed by Staff A.Packet Materials for the July 19, 2022 meeting. Council Members for next week’s offsite Council meeting we are unsure of the internet reliability. There are a few options to make sure you have your packet materials for that meeting. You can download your Dropbox materials to your computer You can download the packet from PrimeGov to your computer We can have a hard copy of the packet printed for you Please let Linda or your liaison know how you would like to receive your agenda and packet materials for the July 19th Council meeting.