11/22/2022 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
REVISED AGENDA
FORMAL MEETING
November 22, 2022 Tuesday 7:00 PM
Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in
person at the City & County Building. Learn more at www.slc.gov/council/agendas.
Council Work Room
451 South State Street Room 326
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
SLCCouncil.com
The Website addresses listed on the agenda may not be available after the Council votes on the item. Not all agenda items will have
a webpage for additional information read associated agenda paperwork.
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Dan Dugan, Chair
District 6
Darin Mano, Vice Chair
District 5
Victoria Petro-Eschler
District 1
Alejandro Puy
District 2
Chris Wharton
District 3
Ana Valdemoros
District 4
Amy Fowler
District 7
Generated: 08:40:35
Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet
determined.
WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES
A.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.Council Member Darin Mano will conduct the formal meeting.
2.Pledge of Allegiance.
3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules.
4.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor
Mendenhall recognizing December 1st as World AIDS Day in Salt Lake City.
B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Items B1 – B4 will be heard as one public hearing
1. Grant Application: Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP)
Discretionary Grant Fiscal Year 2022
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Transportation Division to the U.S. Department of Transportation. If awarded,
the grant would fund the analysis and prioritization of solutions to the east-west
divide through transportation infrastructure changes which support connectivity
and community stabilization. The study will include the rail corridor and east-
west crossings including 600 North, 200 South, 400 South, 800 South, 900
South/9-Line Trail, 1300 South, 1700 South, and 2100 South.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
2. Grant Application: 2024 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from
the Housing Stability Division to the Workforce Services, Homeless Services. If
awarded, the grant would fund two new patrol officers and one new sergeant,
continued funding for two Housing Stability HEART Community Engagement
Coordinators and twelve police officers, and professional development and
supplies for Housing Stability HEART Community Engagement Coordinators,
public safety equipment and supplies.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
3. Grant Application: Plug-In Electric Vehicle Make-Ready Project
Funding
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Department of Sustainability to Rocky Mountain Power. If awarded, the grant
would fund the installation of electric vehicle supply equipment for one single
port Level 2 electric vehicle charging station and one double port Level 2 charging
station located at 200 South 200 East and 200 South 400 West. Installation will
take place during the 200 South roadway reconstruction.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
4. Grant Application: Urban Sustainability Directors Network -
Emergent Learning Fund 2022 Quarter 4
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Department of Sustainability to the Urban Sustainability Directors Network
(USDN). If awarded, the grant would fund materials and supplies, consultant
services, and equity-focused community-based organization participation for the
Spring 2023 Western Adaptation Alliance (WAA) Conference.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
1. Ordinance: Rezone at 856 West 1300 South
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of
the property at 856 West 1300 South Street from R-1/5,000 (Single-Family
Residential District) to FB-UN1 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood District). The
parcel is currently occupied by a single-family residential dwelling. This proposed
zoning map amendment change will facilitate potential redevelopment of this
parcel into a single-family attached residential project. The zoning map
amendment does not require an amendment to the Westside Master Plan.
Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district
with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00009
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 11, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
2. Resolution: Digital Equipment Donation Program - Benefits Analysis
and Recommendation
The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the donation
of certain City computers to benefit disadvantaged communities and low-
moderate income families through a Digital Donation Program. The program
would donate 146 surplus computers the City no longer intends to use to local
nonprofits for distribution to community members in need. Twenty-five of the
surplus computers will be allocated to Youth and Family Service to support
individuals being served through their programming.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
D.COMMENTS:
1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled
for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited
to two minutes.)
E.NEW BUSINESS:
1. Resolution: Accepting the Certified Results of the Salt Lake City
Special Bond Municipal General Election 2022
The Council will consider adopting a resolution of the certified canvassed results
and approve the results of the Special Bond Election held in Salt Lake City, Utah
on November 8, 2022. The $85 million general obligation bond would allow for
investments in parks, trails and open spaces in all Council Districts.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider
motions.
2. Ordinance: Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance enacting temporary zoning
regulations authorizing the Volunteers of America Youth Resource Center at
approximately 888 south 400 west to increase the maximum capacity by up to 10
more individuals, as long as the maximum occupancy meets building and fire
code safety standards. The temporary zoning regulations will expire on April 15,
2023.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider
motions.
F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
NONE.
G.CONSENT:
1. Ordinance: Library Budget Amendment No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2022-23
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 7 p.m. to accept
public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the
budget for the Library Fund for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen
several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including
proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes
appropriating funds to facilitate the purchase of property among other changes.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
2. Grant Holding account Items (Batch No.5) for Fiscal Year 2022-23
The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 5)
for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
3. Board Appointment: Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officer – Kirsten
R. Allen
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Kirsten R. Allen as
a Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officer for a term ending November 22, 2027.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date -
Hold hearing to accept public comment -
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
4. Board Appointment: Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officer – Brandon
T. Crowther
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Brandon T. Crowther as
a Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officer for a term ending November 22, 2027.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
5. Board Appointment: Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officer – Clinton
Drake
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Clinton Drake as a
Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officer for a term ending November 22, 2027.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
6. Board Appointment: Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officer – Bryan M.
Scott
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Bryan M. Scott as a
Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officer for a term ending November 22, 2027.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
H.ADJOURNMENT:
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 1:30 p.m. on Monday, November 21, 2022, the undersigned, duly appointed City
Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public
Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided
to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any
others who have indicated interest.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but
not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations
of options discussed.
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for
reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary
aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay
service 711.
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-4 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: Nov. 22, 2022
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSION
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: Nov. 22, 2022
Potential Action: TBD
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted four grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
2.2022 Reconnecting Communities Pilot Discretionary Grant – Critical
Connections: Healing Salt Lake City’s East-West Divide
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: If awarded, the grant monies will be used to fund the
analysis and prioritization of solutions to the east-west divide through transportation
infrastructure changes which support connectivity and community stabilization. The study
will include the rail corridor and east-west crossings including 600 North, 200 South, 400
South, 800 South, 900 South/9-Line Trail, 1300 South, 1700 South, and 2100 South.
Grant Amount: $1,970,000
Requested by: Department of Community & Neighborhoods Transportation Division
Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation – Office of the Secretary of
Transportation
Match Requirement: $1,770,000 – Source: Funding Our Futures $1,240,000; RDA
$25,000; Dept. of Public Utilities $5,000
Additional information provided by the Administration:
Page | 2
Transportation Division requested $1,970,000 for Critical Connections: Healing Salt Lake City’s East-West
Divide.
The project is an analysis and prioritization of solutions to the east-west divide through transportation
infrastructure changes that foster connectivity and community stabilization.
Transportation facilities proposed for study are the intersections of the north-south Interstate-15 and rail corridor
and east-west crossings (600 North, 200 South, 400 South, 800 South, 900 South/9-Line Trail, 1300 South, 1700
South, and 2100 South.)
Federal Share Non-
Federal/Local
Share
Proposed
Project
RCP Discretionary
Grant
Utah Transit
Authority
Salt Lake City Total
Critical
Connections
$1,970,000 $500,000 $1,270,000 $3,740,000
Total $1,970,000 $500,000 $1,270,000 $3,740,000
Funding Our Futures
Proposed Project Public Utilities FY22-23 BAM#4 RDA Total
Critical Connection $5,000 $1,240,000 $25,000 $1,270,000
▪The $1.24 million proposed from Funding Our Futures is a re-scoping of the $1.24 million local non-federal
match committed by the City from Funding Our Futures for the $5 million grant request made to the U.S.
Department of Transportation Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE)
2022 for Solving the Puzzle of Salt Lake City East West Connections.
▪The City was unsuccessful in securing a RAISE 2022 grant award for Solving the Puzzle of Salt Lake City East
West Connections.
▪Critical Connections: Healing Salt Lake City’s East-West Divide is a re-scoping of Solving the Puzzle of Salt
Lake City East West Connections to align with the RCP Pilot Discretionary Grant Program FY2022 priorities
and funding thresholds.
▪The $3,740,000 worth of federal/non-federal cost share is allocated for contractual services detailed below.
Cost Category Federal + Non-Federal Cost Share Total
Transportation Planning-Engineering-Design
Consultant(s) [data collection and technical analysis,
screening of alternatives, prioritization and environmental
process, conceptual and preliminary engineering, cost
estimating, renderings, and production and implementation
facilitation of Community Participation Plan]
$3,425,000
Community-Based Organizations [community
engagement consulting, outreach assistance, language
translation services, etc.]
$225,000
Public Art Artist(s) via Salt Lake City Arts Council
[community engagement and visioning, production of
temporary works of public art at one or two priority
crossings]
$90,000
TOTAL $3,740,000
Page | 3
Questions:
a. Please provide metrics for this grant. What will members of the community
see or experience as a result of the completion of this grant?
Members of the community would be invited to participate in a community-based discussion(s) about the
challenges and potential transportation solutions to address the east-west divide. Community engagement
would include a mix of virtual outreach strategies and in-person contacts at daily destination venues such as
local parks, grocery stores, convenience stores, etc. There would also be an opportunity for community
members to participate in artistic visionings of potential east-west crossing experiences. The community
input would inform the project outcome of conceptual and/or preliminary design recommendations that are
tailored to seek construction funds. Metrics would include:
•Number of community engagement opportunities conducted
•Number of comments received (in-person, virtual)
•Number of crossings with the potential to achieve increased travel time predictability as a
function of transportation infrastructure improvements under consideration during the planning
phase
•Number of crossings forwarded to conceptual design
•Number of crossings forwarded to preliminary engineering design
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
1 of 2
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez,
Lehua Weaver
Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer
Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk
Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com
Department of Police – Grant Acquisition and Management | Jordan Smith
CC: Department of Community and Neighborhoods | Blake Thomas, Orion Goff, Jon Larsen, Becka Roolf,
Julianne Sabula, Kevin Young
FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg
DATE: October 19, 2022
SUBJECT: Reconnecting Communities Pilot Discretionary Grant 2022 | Critical Connections: Healing Salt Lake City’s
East-West Divide
FUNDING AGENCIES: U.S. Department of Transportation - Office of the Secretary of Transportation
GRANT PROGRAM: Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP) Discretionary Grant Fiscal Year 2022
REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $1,970,000
DEPARTMENT: Department of Community and Neighborhoods | Transportation Division
COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Union Pacific Railroad, Utah Department of Transportation, Utah Transit Authority
DATE SUBMITTED: October 13, 2022
SPECIFICS:
□ Equipment/Supplies Only
□ Technical Assistance
□ Provides Hourly Positions
□ Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
Match Required $1,770,000 In-Kind Services and Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
Transportation Division requested $1,970,000 for Critical Connections: Healing Salt Lake City’s East-West
Divide.
The project is an analysis and prioritization of solutions to the east-west divide through transportation
infrastructure changes that foster connectivity and community stabilization.
Transportation facilities proposed for study are the intersections of the north-south Interstate-15 and rail
corridor and east-west crossings (600 North, 200 South, 400 South, 800 South, 900 South/9-Line Trail, 1300
South, 1700 South, and 2100 South.)
2 of 2
The $3,740,000 worth of federal and non-federal cost share is structured as detailed below.
Proposed Project
Federal Share Non-Federal / Local Share
Total RCP Discretionary Grant Utah Transit Authority Salt Lake City
Critical Connections $1,970,000 $500,000 $1,270,000 $3,740,000
Total $1,970,000 $1,770,000 $3,740,000
The $1,270,000 worth of non-federal share from Salt Lake City is sourced from the following:
Salt Lake City Non-Federal Share
Proposed Project
Dept. of
Public
Utilities
Funding Our Futures FY 22-23
(Proposed in FY22-23 BA #4)
Redevelopment
Agency of Salt
Lake City Total
Critical Connections $5,000 $1,240,000 $25,000 $1,270,000
The $1.24 million proposed from Funding Our Futures is a re-scoping of the $1.24 million local non-federal
match committed by the City from Funding Our Futures for the $5 million grant request made to the U.S.
Department of Transportation Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) 2022
for Solving the Puzzle of Salt Lake City East West Connections.
The City was unsuccessful in securing a RAISE 2022 grant award for Solving the Puzzle of Salt Lake City East
West Connections.
Critical Connections: Healing Salt Lake City’s East-West Divide is a re-scoping of Solving the Puzzle of Salt Lake
City East West Connections to align with the RCP Pilot Discretionary Grant Program FY2022 priorities and
funding thresholds.
The $3,740,000 worth of federal/non-federal cost share is allocated for contractual services detailed below.
Cost Category
Federal + Non-Federal
Cost Share Total
Contractual
Transportation Planning-Engineering-Design Consultant(s) [data collection and
technical analysis, screening of alternatives, prioritization and environmental process,
conceptual and preliminary engineering, cost estimating, renderings, and production and
implementation facilitation of Community Participation Plan]
$3,425,000
Community-Based Organizations [community engagement consulting, outreach
assistance, language translation services, etc.]
$225,000
Public Art Artist(s) via Salt Lake City Arts Council [community engagement and
visioning, production of temporary works of public art at one or two priority crossings]
$90,000
Total $3,740,000
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-4 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: Nov. 22, 2022
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSION
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: Nov. 22, 2022
Potential Action: TBD
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted four grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
1.2024 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: Each year, the City receives an allocation from the State
Account for Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation. The amount allocated to the City is
determined by state statute. The Administration is requesting to use the grant monies to
fund the following:
A. Salary and benefits for two new patrol officers and one new sergeant.
B. Continued funding for two Housing Stability HEART Community Engagement
Coordinators, and twelve police officers
C. Professional development and supplies for Housing Stability HEART Community
Engagement Coordinators
D. Public safety equipment and supplies
E. Subawards to Volunteers of America of $259,167
Grant Amount: $2,750,000
Requested by: Housing Stability Division, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
Page | 2
Funding Agency: Workforce Services, Homeless Services, State of Utah in collaboration with
Volunteers of America
Match Requirement: -0-
Questions:
Please provide an itemization of costs for the new positions and the other expenses.
Will the new patrol officer and sergeant positions be assigned to mitigate issues in the areas
surrounding the homeless shelters? Do the costs for these positions include patrol cars? If so,
how many?
Yes, the police officers and sergeant will be assigned to mitigate issues surrounding the eligible
resource centers. The FY24 application request includes continuation funding for the 12
positions funded in the FY23 award (reclassing two positions from officers to sergeants) as well
as 5.5 months of funding for one additional sergeant and two additional police officers. The
anticipated hire date for these three new positions is January 2024. The application will also
funds equipment and three vehicles for the new positions.
Salary and benefits for two new patrol officers and one new sergeant.
5.5 months, anticipated hire date of January 2024
Officer Salaries: $31,898.53 x 2 officers = $63,797.07
Officer Benefits: $22,440.62 x 2 officers - $44,881.24
Sergeant Salaries: $45,364.37
Sergeant Benefits: $31,913.83
Continued funding for two Housing Stability HEART Community Engagement Coordinators,
and twelve police officers
(2) HEART Community Engagement Coordinators
Salaries and Benefits: $149,336.10
(10) Officer Salaries: $69,596.80 x 10 officers = $695,968.00
(10) Officer Benefits: $48,961.35 x 10 officers - $489,613.49
(2) Sergeant Salaries: $111,155.20 x 2 sergeants = $222,310.40
(2) Sergeant Benefits: $78,197.68 x 2 sergeants = $156,395.37
Professional development and supplies for Housing Stability HEART Community Engagement
Coordinators
Mobile Phone Costs: $1,032.00
Supply Costs for Community Events w/ the HRCs: $2,400.00
Training Costs (estimated as cost to attend one National Alliance to End Homelessness
Conference in California: $4,832.50
Public safety equipment and supplies
Page | 3
PROGRAM
EQUIPMENT
Item Qty Unit Cost Cost
Police HRC - Officer Equipment
(existing)
10 $12,776.00 $127,760.00
Police HRC - Sergeant
Equipment (existing)
2 $12,776.00 $25,552.00
Police HRC - Officer Equipment
(new)
2 $19,979.00 $39,958.00
Police HRC - Sergeant
Equipment (new)
1 $19,979.00 $19,979.00
Police HRC - Officer Program
Vehicles (new)
2 $69,000.00 $138,000.00
Police HRC - Sergeant Program
Vehicle (new)
1 $66,700.00 $66,700.00
TOTAL Program
Equipment
$417,949.00
PROGRAM
SUPPLIES
Item Qty Unit Cost Cost
Police HRC - Employee
Computer & Software (existing)
12 $3,500.00 $42,000.00
Police HRC - Vehicle Fuel /
Repair (existing)
12 $5,200.00 $62,400.00
Police HRC - Employee Costs
(existing)
12 $2,196.00 $26,352.00
Police HRC - Employee
Computer & Software (new)
3 $2,500.00 $7,500.00
Police HRC - Vehicle Fuel /
Repair (new)
3 $4,180.00 $12,540.00
Police HRC - Employee Hiring
Costs (new)
3 $2,553.00 $7,659.00
Police HRC - Employee Costs
(new)
3 $2,196.00 $6,588.00
TOTAL Program Supplies $165,039.00
Page | 4
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Office of the City Co uncil | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia R ichards , Linda Sanchez,
Lehua Weaver
Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Andrew J ohnston
Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Sarah Behrens , Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk
Office of the City Attorney | J aysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com
Department of Police – Grant Acquisition and Management | Jordan Smith
CC: Housing Stability | Michelle Hoon
FROM: Sarah Behrens
DATE: October 24, 2022
SUBJECT: FY 24 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant
FUNDING AGENCIES: Workforce Services, Homeless Services | State of Utah
GRANT PROGRAM: FY 24 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant
GRAN T ALLOCATION AMOUNT: $2,750,000
DEPARTMENT: Housing Stability Division| Department of Community and Neighborhoods
COLLABORATING AGEN CIES: Volunteers of Amer ica
DATE SUBMITTED: October 19, 2022
SPECIFI CS:
Equipment /Supplies Only
Technical Assistance
Provides 17 FTE Positions
Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation: Please see below
Match Required In-Kind Services and Cash
GRAN T DETAILS:
Salt L ake City is receiving $2.75M from the State Account for Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation. The amount allocated to the City is
determined by state statute .
The FY 24 request is for
• Two new patrol officers and one new sergeant and
• Continue d funding for two Housing Stability HEART Community Engagement Coordinators and twelve police officers.
• Professional development and supplies for Housing Stability HEART Community Engagement Coordinators Public Safety
equipment and supplies.
• Volunteers to America Subaward totals $259,167.
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-4 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: Nov. 22, 2022
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSION
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: Nov. 22, 2022
Potential Action: TBD
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted four grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
3.2021 Plug-In Electric Vehicle Make-Ready Project Funding Grant – 200 South
Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: If awarded, the grant monies will be used to fund the
installation of electric vehicle supply equipment for one single port Level 2 electric vehicle
charging station and one double port Level 2 charging station located at 200 South 200
East and 200 South 400 West. Installation will take place during the 200 South roadway
reconstruction.
Grant Amount: $38,320
Requested by: Transportation Division of the Community and Neighborhoods
Department
Funding Agency: Rocky Mountain Power in collaboration with the Transportation
Division
Match Requirement: $9,580 – Source: Existing budget from the Department of
Sustainability for electrified transportation
Page | 2
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez,
Lehua Weaver
Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer
Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk
Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com
Department of Police – Grant Acquisition and Management | Jordan Smith
CC: Department of Sustainability | Debbie Lyons, Sophia Nicholas, Catherine Wyffels
FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg
DATE: October 25, 2022
SUBJECT: Plug-In Electric Vehicle Make-Ready Project Funding | 200 South Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
FUNDING AGENCIES: Rocky Mountain Power
GRANT PROGRAM: Plug-In Electric Vehicle Make-Ready Project Funding
REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $38,320
DEPARTMENT: Department of Sustainability
COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Salt Lake City Division of Transportation
DATE SUBMITTED: October 21, 2022
SPECIFICS:
Equipment/Supplies Only
□ Technical Assistance
□ Provides Hourly Positions
□ Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
Match Required $9,580 In-Kind Services and Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
Sustainability Department requested $38,320 for the 200 South Electric Vehicle Charging Stations project.
The project installs electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) to support the addition of one single port Level 2 electric
vehicle (EV) charging station and one double port Level 2 EV charging station to the 200 South corridor.
Potential EV charging station sites are near the 200 South/200 East intersection and the 200 South/400 West
intersection.
The EVSE includes new conduit, wiring, electrical breakers, and junction boxes.
EVSE installation will occur during the construction phase of the 200 South roadway reconstruction.
The $9,580 worth of match from Salt Lake City is sourced from a portion of the Sustainability Department Fiscal
Year 2022-2023 adopted budget allocated for electrified transportation.
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-4 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: Nov. 22, 2022
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSION
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: Nov. 22, 2022
Potential Action: TBD
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted four grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
4.Emergent Learning Fund 2022 Quarter 4 – Urban Sustainability Directors
Network - Western Adaption Alliance Conference
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: If awarded, the grant monies will be used to fund materials
and supplies, consultant services, and equity-focused community-based organization
participation for the Spring 2023 Western Adaptation Alliance (WAA) Conference.
NOTE: The City applied for this same grant earlier this year but was not selected. The
Administration is now re-applying for the same amount and same purpose for the fourth
quarter.
Grant Amount: $20,000
Requested by: Department of Sustainability
Funding Agency: Urban Sustainability Directors Network – Emergent Learning Fund in
collaboration with the City of Tempe, Arizona
Match Requirement: $87,000 – Source: In-kind (see below)
The following information was provided by the Administration:
Materials & Supplies $ 2,000
Page | 2
Consultant Services $ 8,000
Equity-Focused Community Based
Organization Participation $10,000
Total Funds Requested $20,000
The Administration provided the following information in response to questions from
Council staff for last quarter’s application:
a) What is the source of the match requirement?
$47,000: Estimated value of airfare, ground transportation, lodging and other expenses for
approximately 25 WAA communities and other partners to attend. There will be no travel
expenses for SLC staff to attend, as the event is proposed to be hosted in SLC.
$40,000: Estimated value of in-kind leverage of staff time from partner organizations and
technical experts to prepare for and contribute to convening activities. This estimate does
not include WAA local government staff time.
b)Could you please elaborate on the WAA organization and conference (is the
City a member, is there an annual cost, what are the benefits to the City, etc.)
The Western Adaptation Alliance (WAA) is a regional network of Southwest and
Intermountain U.S. cities that have similar climate challenges. Salt Lake City and Tempe, AZ
co-chair. Bimonthly virtual workshops are held on various topics related to partnership-
building, anticipated grant opportunities, and common climate impact interests such as
drought, wildfire, air quality, and heat. Cities from ID, MT, UT, CO, NM, AZ, and NV
regularly participate in workshops. In-person conferences are infrequent.
The networking group has existed for about a decade. In the past decade, a few in-person
convenings, trainings, and strategic planning sessions for the group have been supported by
the Urban Sustainability Directors Network, ICLEI, and other philanthropic organizations.
The WAA network exists to share information, resources, and tools, and collaborate on
regional approaches to addressing climate resilience. There is no cost for cities to
participate.
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
1 of 2
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda
Sanchez, Lehua Weaver
Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer
Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk
Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com
Department of Police – Grant Acquisition and Management | Jordan Smith
CC: Department of Sustainability | Debbie Lyons, Sophia Nicholas
FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg
DATE: October 28, 2022
SUBJECT: Urban Sustainability Directors Network - Emergent Learning Fund 2022 Quarter 4
FUNDING AGENCY: Urban Sustainability Directors Network (USDN)
GRANT PROGRAM: Emergent Learning Fund 2022 Quarter 4
REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $20,000
DEPARTMENT: Department of Sustainability
COLLABORATING AGENCIES: City of Tempe, Arizona
DATE SUBMITTED: October 26, 2022
SPECIFICS:
□ Equipment/Supplies Only
□ Technical Assistance
□ Provides FTE
□ Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
Match Required $87,000 In-Kind and □ Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
Department of Sustainability requested $20,000 to host a spring 2023 in-person convening for the Western
Adaptation Alliance (WAA) with a focus on Aligning Investments: Economic Justice and Equitable Resilience.
The grant request submitted to the USDN Quarter 3 funding round in September 2022 was not selected for an
award. The October 2022 submission is made to the USDN Quarter 4 funding round at the invitation of USDN.
WAA is a regional network of cities from Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah with
similar climate challenges. Salt Lake City, Utah and Tempe, Arizona co-chair bimonthly virtual workshops on topics
related to partnership building, anticipated grant opportunities, and shared climate impact interests such as
drought, wildfire, air quality, and heat. In-person conferences are infrequent.
2 of 2
The requested grant funds are directed toward materials and supplies ($2,000), contractual consultant services
($8,000), and support for equity-focused community-based organization participation ($10,000).
The source of the match is the estimated value of airfare, ground transportation, lodging and other expenses for
approximately 25 WAA communities and other partners to attend the convening in Salt Lake City ($47,000) and the
estimated value of staff time from partner organizations and technical experts to prepare for and contribute to
convening activities, not including WAA local government staff time ($40,000). It is not anticipated that USDN will
require tracking or reporting on the in-kind match.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: 856 West 1300 South Zoning Map Amendment
PLNPCM2022-00009
MOTION 1 (adopt)
I move that the Council adopt the ordinance with a requirement that the petitioner enter a development
agreement with the following conditions as outlined in the ordinance:
•Development of the property shall be for residential use only
•The maximum height of structures on the property shall not exceed two and a half stories and 30 feet
•Development of the property shall include at least one parking space for each dwelling unit
•Development of the property shall not exceed 60% lot coverage
•All dwelling units shall include at least three bedrooms.
MOTION 2 (reject)
I move that the Council reject the petition.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: 856 West 1300 South Zoning Map Amendment
PLNPCM2022-00009
PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE
No one spoke at the public hearing for this item. One caller was unable to connect. Council staff reached
out to this person but has not received a response as of the date this report was submitted. The Council
closed the public hearing and deferred action to a future Council meeting.
The City Attorney’s Office updated the ordinance for this proposal to include a requirement that the
petitioner enter a development agreement with the City that includes conditions listed below in the briefing
update.
The following information was provided for the November 10, 2022 public hearing. It
is provided again for background purposes.
BRIEFING UPDATE
At the October 10, 2022 briefing, Council Members were generally supportive of the proposed zoning map
amendment. Questions were raised about unit configuration and anticipated price, and how the height
compares to existing single-story homes in the area.
The petitioner contacted Council staff stating their intent is to construct two buildings with three for sale
dwelling units of two- to three-bedrooms each. Pricing is anticipated to be in the mid-$400,000 range, but
fluctuating market conditions could alter the price by the time construction is complete. In response to a
Council Member concern about the area’s high water table, the petitioner stated the proposed buildings
would be constructed on-grade, without basements.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: October 11, 2022
Set Date: October 18, 2022
Public Hearing: November 10, 2022
Potential Action: November 22, 2022
Page | 2
To address on-street parking concerns, the petitioner proposed a development agreement requiring at least
one parking space per unit. Other development agreement conditions they proposed include:
•Limiting development to residential use
•Compliance with FB-UN1 design guidelines
•Limit to 2.5 stories and 30 feet (currently height is limited to 28 feet for a pitched roof, and 20 feet
for flat roofs)
•Limit lot coverage to 60% which exists in the current R-1/5,000 zoning
•All dwelling units will have a minimum of three bedrooms
The following information was provided for the October 11, 2022 Council briefing. It is
provided again for background purposes.
The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the zoning map for property located at 856 West
1300 South in City Council District Two from its current R-1/5,000 (single-family residential) zoning to
FB-UN1 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood). The petitioner’s stated objective is to redevelop the
approximately 0.28-acre parcel with six for sale townhomes. A single-family home on the site is proposed
to be removed as part of the development. It reportedly has radon and asbestos issues and is not connected
to the City sewer system.
Nearby parcels are primarily single-family residential, with some Neighborhood Commercial, Open Space,
and Public Lands as shown in the area zoning map below.
Planning staff recommended the Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation to the City
Council. Planning felt the proposal does not meet applicable standards for approval which are discussed in
the Key Considerations section below. The Commission discussed the proposed zoning map amendment
during its August 24, 2022 meeting and held a public hearing at which no one spoke. The Commission
closed the public hearing and voted 7-4 to forward a positive recommendation to the Council.
Commissioners who voted in support of the proposal noted the need for additional housing in the city and
needed area revitalization. Those who voted against forwarding a positive recommendation cited concerns
including a townhome development is out of character with the neighborhood, and potential for the FB-
UN1 zoning district to proliferate in the area where it was not intended to be used.
Page | 3
Area zoning map with the subject parcel outlined.
Note: The Sorenson Center is located at the blue
Public Lands (PL) area at the bottom of the image.
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning map amendment, determine if the Council supports
moving forward with the proposal.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. The petitioner indicated new residential units would be for sale at an attainable price point. The
Council may wish to ask the petitioner about a range of prices the proposed units are anticipated to
sell for.
2. The Council may wish to discuss the tradeoffs between allowing additional density in this area and
spurring gentrification. In evaluation, the Council may wish to request additional information from
the developer on the types of units such as size and number of bedrooms, and levels of affordability.
3. There is no minimum off-street parking requirement in FB-UN zoning districts. The Council may
wish to ask the petitioner if there are plans for off-street parking in the proposed development.
4. The housing loss mitigation plan recommends the petitioner enter a development agreement with
the City for replacement of at least one housing unit. Does the Council wish to include this as a
condition if the proposed zoning map amendment ordinance is adopted?
5. The Council may wish to ask if the existing home on the property home is occupied and if residents
will be assisted with relocation.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property. No formal site plan has been submitted
to the City nor is it within the scope of the Council’s authority to review the plans. Because zoning of a
property can outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of
changing the zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project.
HOUSING LOSS MITIGATION
Because the proposal includes loss of a housing unit and the planned FB-UN1 zoning designation does not
Page | 4
require residential uses in new developments, a housing loss mitigation plan is required. Section 18.97.130
of Salt Lake City Code outlines three options for housing loss mitigation:
A. Construction of replacement housing
B. Payment of a fee based on the difference between existing housing market value and the cost of
replacement, and
C. Payment of a flat mitigation fee if demonstrated that the costs of calculating and analyzing the
various methods of mitigation are unreasonably excessive in relationship to the rough estimated
costs of constitutionally permitted mitigation.
The petitioner proposes constructing six housing units on the subject parcel, which would satisfy Option A.
The Community and Neighborhoods Department Director approved the housing loss mitigation report and
determined the petitioner should enter a development agreement with the City for replacement of at least
one housing unit to comply with City housing loss mitigation standards in Salt Lake City Code.
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Planning staff identified three key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 3-4 of
the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the
staff report.
Consideration 1: Is the FB-UN1 appropriate in the proposed location?
Planning staff believes FB-UN zones are more appropriate in areas of the city that are more densely
populated, closer to shopping, employment opportunities, other daily needs, and within proximity to mass
transit, specifically TRAX.
It is Planning’s opinion that while bus service is available nearby, form-based zoning is not warranted
based on the FB-UN zones.
Consideration 2: Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning
One purpose of form-based zones is to provide appropriately scaled buildings that respect the
neighborhood’s existing character. It is Planning’s belief that uses allowed under FB-UN1 zoning other than
the proposed townhome development would be too intensive and may have a detrimental impact on
surrounding property owners. Some of these potential uses are a bed & breakfast, daycare, congregate care
facility, assisted living facility, government or municipal services facility, or off-street parking.
Consideration 3: City Adopted Master Plans
The 2014 Westside Master Plan states: “All new infill development, whether single-, or two- or multi-
family residential should adhere to the prevailing development pattern in the immediate area.” It is
Planning staff’s opinion single-family attached or other greater density land use is not consistent with the
Plan as adjacent properties are single-family detached residential. However, Planning also noted housing
issues in the city have changed in the years since the Westside Master Plan was adopted, and the need for
additional housing may outweigh stricter adherence to the Plan’s policies.
ZONING DISTRICT COMPARISON
The following table compares some standards of the R-1/5,000 and FB-UN1 zoning districts. Please see
pages 18-19 of the Planning Commission staff report for additional information.
R-1/5,000 (existing)FB-UN1 (proposed)
Building Height Flat Roof: 20 FT 2.5 stories, maximum of 30
FT, measured from established grade
Page | 5
Pitched Roof: 28 FT or Average
height of other principal
building on the block face
Setbacks Front Yard: Average of existing
buildings on the block face
unless otherwise established
by plat. No greater than the
setback of the existing
building.
Interior Side Yard: 4 FT on one
side 10 FT on the other
Rear Yard: 25% of lot depth or
20 FT, whichever is less
Front Yard: Equal to the
average setback of the block
face, where applicable,
otherwise minimum of 10 FT
and maximum of 20 FT
Interior Side Yard: 4 FT
Rear Yard: Minimum 20% lot
depth up to 25 FT
Maximum Building
Coverage
60% of the lot area N/A
Lot Area/Width Minimum: 5000 SF/50 Feet
Maximum: 7500 SF
Minimum: 1500-3000 SF/15-30 FT
ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
Attachment F (pages 24-25) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment
factors that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The factors and findings are
summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information.
Factor Planning Division
Finding
Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with
the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as
stated through its various adopted planning documents.
Does Not Comply
Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the
specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance.
Does Not Comply
The extent to which a proposed map amendment will
affect adjacent properties.
Does Not Comply
Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with
the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay
zoning districts which may impose additional standards.
N/A
The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to
serve the subject property, including, but not limited to,
roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire
protection, schools, stormwater drainage systems, water
supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection.
Complies
DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS
In department review of this proposed zoning map amendment, Transportation noted FB-UN zoning does
not have minimum required parking and on-street parking in the area is limited. Public Utilities stated
redevelopment of the property may require additional utility improvements. These would be addressed
Page | 6
during site plan review. Other departments had no objections to the proposed rezone or did not provide
comments.
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
• January 3, 2022-Applications submitted.
• January 27, 2022-Petition assigned to Caitlynn Tubbs.
• May 17, 2022- Petition reassigned to Lex Traughber.
• June 15, 2022-Early notification mailed to property owners and tenants located within 300 feet of
the subject property boundaries.
• June 15, 2022-Planning staff attended Glendale Community Council meeting at which the
petitioner presented his proposal. (The Glendale Community Council submitted a letter dated
March 30, 2022 supportive of the zoning map amendment.)
• August 10, 2022-Property posted with signs for the August 244, 2022 Planning Commission
public hearing.
• August 11, 2022-Planning Commission August 24, 2022 public hearing notice mailed to property
owners and residents within 300 feet of the subject property. Listserv notification of the Planning
Commission agenda emailed. Agenda posted on the Planning Division and State websites.
• August 24, 2022-Planning Commission public hearing at which the Commission voted to forward
a positive recommendation for the zoning map amendment to the City Council.
• August 26, 2022-Draft ordinance sent to the City Attorney’s Office for review.
• September 16, 2022-Planning Division received ordinance from the City Attorney’s Office.
• September 22, 2022- Transmittal received in City Council Office.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2022
(Amending the zoning of the property located at 856 West 1300 South Street
from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to FB-UN1 Form Based Urban
Neighborhood District)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to the property located at 856 West
1300 South Street from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to FB-UN1 Form Based
Urban Neighborhood District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00009.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on August
24, 2022 on an application submitted by Jordan Atkin, TAG SLC, LLC, to rezone the property
located at 856 West 1300 South Street (Tax ID No. 15-11-456-016) (the “Property”) from R-
1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District
pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00009; and
WHEREAS, at its August 24, 2022 meeting, the planning commission voted in favor of
forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said application; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests, subject to the conditions provided herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the Property identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be
and hereby is rezoned from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to FB-UN1 Form
Based Urban Neighborhood District.
SECTION 2. Conditions. The proposed zoning map amendment is conditioned upon
the petitioner entering into a development agreement with Salt Lake City that requires the
Property’s owner and its successors to use and develop the Property as follows:
a. Development of the Property shall be for residential use only;
b. The maximum height of structures on the property shall not exceed two and a half stories
and 30 feet;
c. Development of the Property shall include at least one parking space for each dwelling
unit;
d. Development of the Property shall not exceed 60% lot coverage; and
e. All dwelling units must include at least three bedrooms.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this ordinance until the
conditions set forth in Section 2 are satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director
or his designee.
SECTION 4. Time. If the conditions set forth in Section 2 have not been met within
one year after adoption, this ordinance shall become null and void. The City Council may, for
good cause shown, extend the time period for satisfying the above conditions by resolution.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2022.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2022.
Published: ______________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Description for the Property to be Rezoned:
Address: 856 West 1300 South
Tax ID No. 15-11-456-016
W 20 FT OF LOT 12 & ALL LOTS 13 & 14 J BOLTON & CO SUB
TOGETHER WITH 1/2 VACATED ALLEY ABUTTING ON N. 8059-
0519 9365-0954,0957 09415-2302
Contains 12,197 sq feet or 0.28 acres more or less.
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: September 21, 2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2022-00009
856 W. 1300 South Zoning Map Amendment
STAFF CONTACT: Lex Traughber, Senior Planner
(801) 5356184 or lex.traughber@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council amend the zoning map as recommended by the
Planning Commission.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Jordan Atkin, TAG SLC, LLC, proposes to amendment the
zoning map to change the zoning for the 0.28 acre parcel located at the address above from R-
1/5,000 (Single-family Residential District) to FB-UN1 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood
District) in its entirety. The parcel is currently occupied by a single-family residential dwelling.
This zoning map amendment will facilitate the redevelopment of this parcel into a single-family
attached residential project. The zoning map amendment does not require an amendment to the
Westside Master Plan.
The Planning Commission reviewed the request at a public hearing on August 24, 2022. The
Commission determined that the request will not have a detrimental impact on adjacent
properties and that the City’s infrastructure is adequate to support development at the subject
9/22/2022
9/22/2022
Lisa Shaffer (Sep 22, 2022 09:21 MDT)
location. The Commission voted (7 to 4) to forward a positive recommendation on to the City
Council to amend the zoning map as requested.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
● Early Notification – Notification of the proposal was sent to all property owners and
tenants located within 300 feet of the subject parcels on June 15, 2022. In addition, the
Glendale Community Council (GCC) was also provided notification on June 1, 2021.
● Glendale Community Council – The applicant presented and discussed the proposal to
rezone the property at the GCC meeting on June 15, 2021. Planning Staff was in
attendance. A letter of support from the GCC is attached in the Planning Commission
Staff Report dated August 24, 2022.
● Planning Commission Meeting – On August 24, 2022, the Planning Commission held a
public hearing regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. The Planning Commission
voted to forward a positive recommendation regarding the proposal on to the City Council for
decision.
PLANNING AND HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION RECORDS:
a) PC Agenda of August 24, 2022 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes of August 24, 2022 (Click to Access)
c) PC Staff Report of August, 2022 (Click to Access)
EXHIBITS:
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
3. ORIGINAL PETITION
4. MAILING LIST
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2022
(Amending the zoning of the property located at 856 West 1300 South Street
from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to FB-UN1 Form Based Urban
Neighborhood District)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to the property located at 856 West
1300 South Street from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to FB-UN1 Form Based
Urban Neighborhood District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00009.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on August
24, 2022 on an application submitted by Jordan Atkin, TAG SLC, LLC, to rezone the property
located at 856 West 1300 South Street (Tax ID No. 15-11-456-016) (the “Property”) from R-
1/5,000 Singl e-Family Residential District to FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District
pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00009; and
WHEREAS, at its August 24, 2022 meeting, the planning commission voted in favor of
forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said application; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the Property identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be
and hereby is rezoned from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to FB-UN1 Form
Based Urban Neighborhood District.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2022.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2022.
Published: ______________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney
September 16, 2022
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Description for the Property to be Rezoned:
Address: 856 West 1300 South
Tax ID No. 15-11-456-016
W 20 FT OF LOT 12 & ALL LOTS 13 & 14 J BOLTON & CO SUB
TOGETHER WITH 1/2 VACATED ALLEY ABUTTING ON N. 8059-
0519 9365-0954,0957 09415-2302
Contains 12,197 sq feet or 0.28 acres more or less.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
3. ORIGINAL PETITION
4. MAILING LIST
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
856 W. 1300 South Zoning Map Amendment
Petitions PLNPCM2022-00009
January 3, 2022 Petitions received by the City.
January 27, 2022 Petition assigned to Caitlynn Tubbs.
May 17, 2022 Petition reassigned to Lex Traughber.
June 1, 2022 The Glendale Community Council was emailed notification of the
proposal.
June 15, 2022 Early notification mailed to property owners and tenants located
within 300 feet of the subject property boundaries.
June 15, 2022 The applicant formally presented the proposal to the Glendale
Community Council at their regularly scheduled monthly meeting.
Planning Staff was in attendance. The GCC submitted a letter to the
Planning Division dated March 30, 2022 in support of the map
amendment.
August 10, 2022 Property posted with signs for the August 24, 2022 Planning
Commission hearing.
August 11, 2022 Notice of the Planning Commission’s August 24, 2022 Public Hearing
mailed to all property owners and residents within 300 feet of the
subject property. Listserve notification of Planning Commission
agenda emailed. Agenda posted on the Planning Division and State
websites.
August 24, 2022 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Planning Commission
voted to forward a positive recommendation regarding the request on
to the City Council for a decision.
August 26, 2022 Sent a draft ordinance to the City Attorney’s Office for review reflecting
the Planning Commission’s recommendation regarding the zoning
map amendment. Requested review of the draft ordinance.
September 16, 2022 Received ordinance from the City Attorney’s Office.
September 21, 2022 Transmittal submitted to CAN.
2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2022-00009 856 W. 1300 South
Zoning Map Amendment – Jordan Atkin, TAG SLC, LLC, proposes to amendment the zoning
map to change the zoning for the 0.28 acre parcel noted above from R-1/5,000 (Single-family
Residential District) to FB-UN1 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood District) in its entirety. The
parcel is currently occupied by a single-family residential dwelling. This zoning map
amendment change will facilitate the redevelopment of this parcel into a single-family attached
residential project. The subject property is located in Council District 2 represented by
Alejandro Puy.
As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive
comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider
adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE: Date #1 and Date #2
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: **This meeting will not have a physical location.
**This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation. If you are interested in participating in the Public Hearing, please visit our
website at https://www.slc.gov/council/ to learn how you can share your comments during
the meeting. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at
(801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments
received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Lex Traughber at (801) 535-6184 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday or via e-mail at lex.traughber@slcgov.com
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours
in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days
in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.
3. ORIGINAL PETITION
Updated 8/21/2021
Zoning Amendment
Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance Amend the Zoning Map
OFFICE USE ONLY
Received By: Date Received: Project #:
Name or Section/s of Zoning Amendment:
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
Address of Subject Property (or Area):
Name of Applicant: Phone:
Address of Applicant:
E-mail of Applicant:Cell/Fax:
Applicant’s Interest in Subject Property:
Owner Contractor Architect Other:
Name of Property Owner (if different from applicant):
E-mail of Property Owner:Phone:
Please note that additional information may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate
information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and
made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public
review by any interested party.
AVAILABLE CONSULTATION
If you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application, please contact Salt Lake City
Planning Counter at zoning@slcgov.com prior to submitting the application.
REQUIRED FEE
Map Amendment: filing fee of $1,075 plus $121 per acre in excess of one acre
Text Amendment: filing fee of $1,075, plus fees for newspaper notice.
Plus, additional fee for mailed public notices. Noticing fees will be assessed after the application is
submitted.
SIGNATURE
If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required.
Signature of Owner or Agent: Date:
SA
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
TAG SLC, LLC 312-550-6381
Jake@tagslc.com
4
856 W 1300 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84104
PO Box 520697, Salt Lake City, UT 84152
4
1/3/2022 | 2:13 PM MST
Updated 8/21/2021
St
a
f
f
R
e
v
i
e
w
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1.Project Description (please electronically attach additional sheets. See Section 21A.50 for the
Amendments ordinance.)
A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment.
A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned.
List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area.
Is the request amending the Zoning Map?
If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed.
Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance?
If so, please include language and the reference to the Zoning Ordinance to be changed.
WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION
Apply online through the Citizen Access Portal. There is a step-by-step guide to learn how to submit online.
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
______ I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed. I
understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following items are included in the
submittal package.
4
4
4
4
1/3/2022 | 2:13 PM MST
4. MAILING LIST
OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_S OWN_ZIP
GS,TK,LLC 5078 S PINEY RIDGE DR WEST VALL UT 84118
KATRINA L RIVERA; CLARA RI 1224 S 900 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATIOPO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE UT 84114
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATIOPO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE UT 84114
MICHAEL L ROBINSON 4023 W 4490 S WEST VALL UT 84120
TYLER A THOOMAS 1199 S 900 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
WALTER L MARKHAM 886 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
GALE NATION; LINDA NATION5122 S WESLEY RD SALT LAKE UT 84117
MATTHEW H STOWELL 561 KEYSTONE AVE RENO NV 56183
SCOTT DAVID RADER; KRYST 4428 S NIELSEN WY WEST VALL UT 84119
JAVIER LOPEZ; ELVA CALATA 1217 S 900 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
AMBER HOLBROOK 1225 S 900 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
DHALIWAL, LLC 1245 S 900 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
STEVEN ERB; SARAH ERB; BR 865 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
THOMAS M FREESTONE 845 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
JOHNNY JAY WAKEFIELD 6100 STATUTE ST CHESTERFIEVA 23832
MELVIN D HUEFNER 835 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
SAMIUELA H TUKUTAU; OFA 823 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
LAVINIA TUKUAFU; OFA TUK 811 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
STEVEN ERB; SARAH ERB; BR 865 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
STEPHEN P PICKARD 862 W 1300 S SALT LAKE UT 84104
NALANI J NAMAUU PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE UT 84152
DAC VENTURES, LLC 1947 E STAG HILL CIR DRAPER UT 84020
LON E PURCELL; DEANNA PU 838 W 1300 S SALT LAKE UT 84104
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 830 W 1300 S SALT LAKE UT 84104
MAGDALENO L DUARTE 7145 W HUNTER DAWN WY WEST VALL UT 84128
GORDON H LEMMON 7099 S CHERRY TREE LN COTTONW UT 84121
V & K INVESTMENTS, LLC PO BOX 25512 SALT LAKE UT 84125
STEPHEN P PICKARD 862 W 1300 S SALT LAKE UT 84104
SCOTT & SHELLY WUNDERLY 855 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
STEVEN ERB; SARAH ERB; BR 865 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
RLDRE 1300 SOUTH 623 E 2100 S SALT LAKE UT 84106
SALT LAKE CITY PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE UT 84114
VU CAO 1785 MAPLE HILLS DR BOUNTIFULUT 84010
BRIAN C ROLLINS; CHELSEY R 847 W 1300 S SALT LAKE UT 84104
ADAM T WILLIAMS; ELIZABET 845 W 1300 S SALT LAKE UT 84104
BILL WOOLSEY; CAROLYN WO 846 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
GLENDALE DUPLEX, LLC 3556 S 5600 W # 1 WEST VALL UT 84120
VAWDREY HOLDINGS, LLC 12686 S WHISPER CREEK CV DRAPER UT 84020
VAWDREY HOLDINGS, LLC 12686 S WHISPER CREEK CV DRAPER UT 84020
SALT LAKE COMMNUNITY AC 1307 S 900 W SALT LAKE UT 84104
JULIO HERNANDEZ-OLVERA 1390 W 800 S SALT LAKE UT 84104
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATIOPO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE UT 84114
ANTONIO MONRREAL; OLGA 838 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
LARRY D SERVOSS; LILIA P SE 832 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
GEORGE J PEZELY 826 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE UT 84104
Current Occupant 1216 S 900 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1240 S 900 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1250 S 900 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1195 S 900 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 868 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 848 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 871 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 843 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 856 W 1300 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 846 W 1300 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 822 W 1300 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1234 S 800 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1235 S 900 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 864 W 1300 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 857 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 804 W 1300 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1308 S 900 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 1310 S 900 W Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 839 W 1300 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 857 W 1300 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 858 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 879 W 1300 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 823 W 1300 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Current Occupant 815 W 1300 S Salt Lake Ci UT 84104
Lex Traughber 451 S State St, PO Box 145480 SALT LAKE UT 84114-5480
Item C2
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: MOTION SHEET – Resolution – Digital Donation Program
The Council may consider the following motions:
Motion 1 – Adopt
I move that the Council approve a Resolution authorizing the Donation of Certain City
Computers to Benefit Disadvantaged Communities and Low to Moderate Income
Families Through a Digital Donation Program.
Motion 2 – Not Adopt.
I move that the Council not approve the Resolution and move to the next item.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: Nov. 10,2022
Potential Action: Nov. 22, 2022
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Aaron Bentley, Chief Information Officer
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received:
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer
Date Sent to Council:
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 8/23/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Aaron Bentley
Chief Information Officer
Information Management Services
SUBJECT: Digital Equipment Donation Program
STAFF CONTACTS:
Nole Walkingshaw, Chief Innovation Officer, nole.walkingshaw@slcgov.com
Kim Thomas, Youth & Family Director, kim.thomas@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Public Benefits Analysis and Recommendation
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that a public hearing be held on the
matter of the Public Benefits Analysis and that the Council consider adopting a resolution approving
the donation of 146 surplus computers the City no longer intends to use to local nonprofits for
distribution to community members in need. 25 of the surplus computers will be allocated to Youth
and Family Service to support individuals being served through their programming.
BUDGET IMPACT: The proposed action will not materially impact the City budget – See the
attached cost analysis based on the TNT Auction revenue estimates.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Digital Equity Policy of Salt Lake City was adopted on
September 1, 2020 to address the imbalances related to digital equity. One of the action items in the
policy called for increasing digital access via reliable and affordable devices. The SLC Innovation
Team, in coordination with Youth & Family, has developed a pilot Digital Equipment Donation
Program that addresses this need.
Every year, the City accumulates about 300-500 surplus computers (laptops and desktops). Currently
IMS sells these devices to TNT Auction every year at a net loss when taking staff time into
consideration. (See attached cost analysis). Instead of selling its surplus computers, IMS and Youth
9/19/2022
9/19/2022
Lisa Shaffer (Sep 19, 2022 14:23 MDT)
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Aaron Bentley, Chief Information Officer
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
& Family obtained City Council approval to donate equipment to community members who need
digital resources.
In September 2021, IMS and Youth & Family Services (Y&F) completed a pilot program which
donated 18 surplus computers, keyboards, and mice to families and individuals who currently utilize
their services. Now, in phase two of our pilot digital equipment donation program, IMS is proposing
the City donate them to community organizations that serve Salt Lake City’s families and individuals
who need digital resources via an application process. The organizations will then disseminate the
refurbished computers to its clients through their existing computer donation and digital literacy
programs. Working with community organizations will allow a higher volume of computers to be
donated to community members.
IMS and Youth & Family currently have staffing resources to execute phase 2 of the pilot, but future
iterations may need additional resources.
By providing computers and resources on broadband access to communities that need them, the
proposed Digital Equipment Donation program will benefit the residents of Salt Lake City by:
helping bridge the technology gap in disadvantaged communities, increasing digital literacy,
improving student achievement, and reducing the City’s electronic waste output.
Data
According to the 2020 American Community Survey (ACS)1, 13.3 percent of households in Salt
Lake City do not have internet access and 5.3 percent do not own a desktop or laptop. About 10.9
percent of households rely solely on a cellular data plan to stay connected. The pandemic brought
the digital divide into sharp focus as families struggled to coordinate online education for the first
time, find COVID-19 testing sites, and apply for jobs and/or government benefits in 2020. Mental
health issues were exacerbated as lockdowns crept on for months and physical social contact was
restricted. This is especially true for community members who live in Salt Lake City’s Westside
neighborhoods.
In the City’s Westside neighborhoods, a larger proportion of its residents lack home internet
connections, especially among its lower-income and elderly populations. Roughly 18.5 percent of
Westside households are without an internet subscription or broadband of any type, and 28.2
percent of households are without a desktop or laptop.2
The proposed Digital Equipment Donation Program will help bridge this technology gap in Salt
Lake City’s communities by providing refurbished laptops to families and individuals that need
them. And because internet access is necessary for many essential activities such as searching for
jobs, civic participation, signing up for public benefits, tele-working/health, and banking, the
program will also provide resources on how to access low-cost internet, thus ensuring recipients are
1 U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates: shorturl.at/nVY68
2 U.S. Census Bureau, 2019 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Aaron Bentley, Chief Information Officer
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
fully connected. As recipients learn computer skills, they will become more confident with new
technologies and will be better connected to vital services, friends, and family. Therefore, providing
digital equipment and resources on internet access will enhance the health, well-being, peace, and
comfort of these residents of Salt Lake City.
Bridging this technology gap will also increase digital literacy and improve student achievements in
Salt Lake City. A recent study by Michigan State University3 found that students who do not have
access to the Internet from home or rely solely on cellular data perform lower on a range of metrics,
including homework completion and grade point average (half a letter grade lower). The study found
that 64 percent of students in grades 8-11 who do not have home internet access “often or
sometimes” fail to complete homework assignments. The study also found that students with no
home broadband access were less likely to participate in educational activities such as checking
grades, collaborating with peers, researching assignment topics or seeking help from teachers/peers
outside of school hours.
Digital literacy skills can be taught formally in schools, but competency is more likely developed
through frequency of use and online activities that can only be accomplished with a personal device
and home internet access. These skills contribute to broader abilities such as work efficiency,
effective communication, and critical thinking. The Digital Donation Program advances the City’s
priorities related to education and economic development by equipping Salt Lake City’s children and
their families with the skills needed to succeed in a technology-focused economy.
Lastly, consistent with Salt Lake City’s commitment to protecting its natural systems, this program
embraces a resource management approach that emphasizes reducing waste creation and reuse
whenever possible. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), electronic waste or
e-waste is the fastest growing municipal waste stream in America.4 E-waste refers to electronic
products nearing the end of their “useful life.” Laptops, however, can be reused and refurbished. By
refurbishing and donating the City’s surplus devices, we will not only help bridge the digital divide
but reduce Salt Lake City’s electronic waste output and enhance the health and comfort of its
residents.
3 Hampton, K. N., Fernandez, L., Robertson, C. T., & Bauer, J. M. Broadband and
Student Performance Gaps. James H. and Mary B. Quello Center, Michigan State University.
https://doi.org/10.25335/BZGY-3V91
4 United States EPA (2021, June 1). Helping Communities Manage Electronic Waste. http://www.epa.gov.
https://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/helping-communities-manage-electronic-waste
RESOLUTION NO. _____ OF 2022
(Authorizing the Donation of Certain City Computers to Benefit Disadvantaged Communities
and Low-Moderate Income Families Through a Digital Donation Program)
WHEREAS, the donation of computers for which Salt Lake City (“City”) has no ongoing
need through the City’s digital donation program advances the educational and digital equity
goals that the City supports; and
WHEREAS, Utah Code Section 10-8-2(1)(a)(v) allows public entities to authorize the
donation of City property to nonprofit entities after a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, though Utah Code Section 10-8-2 does not require a study for such
nonmonetary assistance, in this case the Salt Lake City Department of Finance has performed a
cost analysis related to the costs associated with disposition of City computers that have reached
end-of-life status (“Analysis”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has, following the giving of not less than fourteen (14) days
public notice, conducted a public hearing relating to the foregoing, in satisfaction of the
requirements of Utah Code Section 10-8-2; and
WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the proposal provided by the City’s Information
Management Department (“IMS”) to donate up to 133 surplus City computers, including any
corresponding, keyboards, mice, or other peripheral accessories that are used with such
computers; has reviewed the Analysis provided in connection with the IMS proposal, and has
fully considered all comments made during the public hearing;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as
follows:
1. The City Council hereby finds and determines that, for all the reasons set forth in
the IMS Proposal and the accompanying Analysis, the donation of the identified computers and
peripheral accessories through the City’s Digital Donation Program is appropriate under these
circumstances. Consequently, the identified computers and peripheral accessories may be donated
to the local nonprofit organizations with the expectation that such computers and peripheral
accessories will be distributed to community members.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of _________, 2022.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By: ______________________
CHAIRPERSON
2
ATTEST:
____________________________
CITY RECORDER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
______________________________
Jaysen Oldroyd, Senior City Attorney
Date: ______8/19/22__________
Salt Lake City Corporation
Digital Equipment Donation Program
Community Organization Application
DRAFT – PENDING APPROVAL
In 2022 the Salt Lake City Council unanimously approved the donation of surplus computers
to community organizations that provide direct services to Salt Lake City residents (pending
City Council approval). The intent of the Digital Equipment Donation Program is to provide
equitable distribution of surplus computers to community members, increase digital literacy,
improve student achievement, and reduce the City’s electronic waste output.
To qualify to receive these surplus computers, the applying community organization is
required to submit this signed application; including an overview of how they will distribute
the computers and provide digital literacy training to recipients. Surplus computers will be
distributed to the community organizations and allocated based on surplus
availability.
The organizations are required to donate the refurbished computers to their clients
through their existing computer donation and/or digital literacy programs.
Community organizations will be awarded surplus computers based on the strength of their
application and established digital literacy program.
Eligibility Requirements for Organizations:
• The donated computers must go directly to the organization’s clients who live in Salt
Lake City in the following zip codes: 84101, 84102, 84103, 84104, 84105, 84106, 84109,
84111, 84114, 84115, 84116, 84119, 84121, 84128.
• The organization must have an established computer donation program and/or
digital literacy program that supports clients they serve.
• The organization must provide a non-profit EIN or tax-exempt number.
Contact Information:
Organization Name:
Primary Contact Name:
Primary Contact Phone Number:
Primary Contact Phone Emails:
Address:
City/Zip
Phone Number:
Website:
Non-Profit EIN or Tax-Exempt Number:
Questions:
1. Provide the mission of your organization:
2. Please provide an overview of your digital literacy program and how long it has been
established:
3. Please provide an overview of how your organization will distribute the surplus
computers to Salt Lake City residents:
4. How many computers do you estimate your organization could distribute yearly?
5. How will you select clients to receive a surplus computer?
The applicant understands and acknowledge the following:
If the applying organization is awarded surplus computers, the organization agrees to
submit a brief report that includes the following information:
• A brief overview of how the distribution process and digital literacy program was
accomplished
• Zip codes of computer recipients
• Age of recipients
The surplus computers hard drives have been erased and factory reset. Applicant recognizes
that computers are donated on an “as-is” “where-is” basis. Salt Lake City makes no
representations, guaranties, or warranties whatsoever as to the condition, quality,
purpose fitness for any particular use, or safety of the computer. All warranties of any
kind whatsoever, expressed, implied, and statutory, pertaining to the computer are
hereby disclaimed. All implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a
particular purpose are hereby disclaimed. Salt Lake City Corporation is not
responsible for maintenance, repair, and the installation or provisioning of working software
to the computer.
Organization Representative Name (Print) Representative Signature Date
_________________________________
SLC Point Person Contact Info: Nole Walkingshaw, Hailey Leek & Joseph Anthony (ask
Joseph the protocol for picking up computer from IMS and the serial numbers)
Grading Rubric: Based on yes/no
• Does the organization have a digital literacy program?
• Does the organization have a distribution plan?
• Can the organization distribute 5 or more computers?
TNT Auctions
REVENUE 9/1/2017 12/1/2017 3/1/2018 6/1/2018 FY 9/1/2018 12/1/2018 3/1/2019 6/1/2019 FY 9/1/2019 12/1/2019 3/1/2020 6/1/2020 FY 9/11/2020 12/1/2020 3/1/2021 6/1/2021 FY 10/20/2021 1/3/2022 3/31/2022 6/27/2022 FY
Revenue Public Auction 11,574$ 4,937$ 36$ 3,195$ 19,741.50$ 1,823$ 6,548$ 1,395$ 923$ 10,687.50$ 2,655$ 2,520$ 5,175.00$ 2,520$ 2,520.00$ 8,528$ 37,053$ 549$ 7,362$ 53,491.50$
Number of Machines Sold 378 183 2 176 739 162 191 43 39 435 94 96 190 54 54 136 280 37 179 632
Dollar per Machine 30.62$ 26.98$ 18.00$ 18.15$ 26.71$ 11.25$ 34.28$ 32.44$ 23.65$ 24.57$ 28.24$ 26.25$ 27.24$ 46.67$ 46.67$ 62.70$ 132.33$ 14.84$ 41.13$ 84.64$
COST
Fixed
Storage 5.90$ 5.78$ 10.28$ 17.52$ 5.84$ 5.84$ 5.84$
Total of Finance Cost per machine 60 0.34$ 0.27$ 1.22$ 1.34$ 0.56$ 0.55$ 0.97$ 0.97$ 0.97$ 0.97$ 0.97$
Employee Time To Pick-up and Register(?) a Machine 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 45
Total Cost to Pick-up and Register(?) per machine 16.23$ 16.23$ 16.23$ 16.23$ 16.93$ 16.81$ 18.83$ 19.09$ 17.42$ 17.39$ 16.23$ 18.30$ 20.60$ 20.60$ 20.60$ 41.21$
Software Cost to Wipe & per machine 4.99$ 4.99$ 4.99$ 4.99$ 4.99$ 4.99$ 4.99$ 4.99$ 4.99$ 4.99$ 4.99$
Employee Time to Wipe & Inventory a Machine 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 37.5
Employee Cost to Wipe & Inventory per machine 14.42$ 14.42$ 14.42$ 14.42$ 19.42$ 19.42$ 19.42$ 19.42$ 19.42$ 19.42$ 19.42$ 19.42$ 19.42$ 19.42$ 8.94$
Disposition Time per machine ( Monti, now DJ)30 30 30 60
Disposition per machine ( Monti, now DJ)60 0.37$ 0.31$ 1.38$ 1.52$ 0.63$ 0.62$ 1.10$ 27.47$ 27.47$ 27.47$ 54.95$
IMS Review and Approval Costs 15.56$ 7.56$ 28.60$ 11.82$
Property Control Agent Review and Approval Costs 5.96$ 2.89$ 2.43$ 4.53$
Employee Time for Auction Pick Up & Reconciliaiton
(mins)60 0.37 0.31 1.4 1.54 0.64 0.63 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.25
Cost per machine 0.27$ 0.23$ 1.01$ 1.11$ 0.46$ 0.45$ 0.80$ 1.02$ 1.02$ 1.02$ 1.14$
Total Time per machine (mins)42.66 42.83 72.5 42.84 50.21 43.06 42.81 43.9 44.04 43.45 43.14 43.13 43.14 43.61 43.61 74 73.61 73.61 143.75 91.15
42.66 42.83 42.80 42.84 42.87 42.81 43.90 44.04 43.14 43.13 43.61
TOTALS 30.81$ 30.98$ 30.95$ 30.99$ 42.50$ 42.34$ 48.25$ 49.01$ 44.12$ 44.05$ 46.69$
Total $ Spent per machine 30.81$ 30.98$ 52.29$ 30.99$ 36.27$ 42.50$ 42.34$ 48.25$ 49.01$ 45.53$ 44.12$ 44.05$ 44.09$ 46.69$ 46.69$ 113.51$ 90.76$ 111.34$ 134.39$ 112.50$
NET Revenue per machine (0.19)$ (4.00)$ (34.29)$ (12.84)$ (12.83)$ (31.25)$ (8.06)$ (15.81)$ (25.36)$ (20.12)$ (15.88)$ (17.80)$ (16.84)$ (0.02)$ (0.02)$ (50.81)$ 41.57$ (96.50)$ (93.26)$ (49.75)$
(0.19)$ (4.00)$ (34.29)$ (12.84)$ (31.25)$ (8.06)$ (15.81)$ (25.36)$ (15.88)$ (17.80)$ (0.02)$
34.67%
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Time RangeNotes
30-60
30-45
60-90
1-2 hours per week
30-60 per Disposition>18 Dispositions in FY23 Q1 (or FY22 Q4?)
60-90 >If load not too big (about 25% of time) DJ will drive computers and parts to vendor in IMS van
Item E1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council
FROM: Ben Luedtke
Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: Resolution: Approving the November 8, 2022, Special Bond Election Results
MOTION 1 – APPROVE RESOLUTION
I move that the Council adopt the resolution accepting the special election results of the Salt Lake City Parks,
Trails, and Open Space bond.
Staff note: Salt Lake County Clerk certified vote tallies are shown on the canvassing resolution. If
voters approve the $85 million general obligation bond proposition, then in accordance with Utah law
resulting funds will solely pay for the costs to acquire, improve, renovate, and upgrade various parks,
trails, open space and related facilities and recreational amenities.
MOTION 2 – NOT APPROVE
I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item.
MEMORANDUM TO CITY LEADERSHIP
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Elected Leadership
Mayor Mendenhall and City Council Chair Dan Dugan
DATE: November 22, 2022
FROM: Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder
Olivia Hoge, Election Management Coordinator
SUBJECT: 2022 Parks, Trails and Open Space General Obligation Bond Canvass
INTRODUCTION:
Salt Lake City contracted with Salt Lake County to conduct the 2022 Midterm Election on November 8,
2022. Out of the 97,943 eligible registered voters in Salt Lake City, 68,034 ballots were counted. This is a
69.5% voter turnout.
In this election, eligible voters voted on the Salt Lake City Bond Proposition, known as the Salt Lake City
Parks, Trails and Open Space General Obligation Bond. 62,412 ballots were cast for this ballot
proposition. There were 44,513 (71.32%) ballots cast For the Issuance of Bonds, and 17,899 (28.68%)
ballots cast Against the Issuance of Bonds.
For the Issuance of Bonds 44,513 71.32%
Against the Issuance of Bonds 17,899 28.68%
Total 62,412
BY PRECINCT:
Precinct For the Issuance of
Bonds
Against the Issuance of Bonds Total
SLC001 239 144 383
SLC002 1 0 1
SLC003 171 154 325
SLC004 392 277 669
SLC005 319 228 547
SLC006 400 147 547
SLC007 326 102 428
SLC008 456 220 676
SLC009 245 237 482
SLC010 202 208 410
SLC011 471 272 743
SLC012 393 199 592
SLC013 480 162 642
SLC014 376 115 491
SLC015 397 182 579
SLC016 185 166 351
SLC017 245 156 401
SLC018 206 145 351
SLC019 112 37 149
SLC020 579 189 768
SLC021 659 189 848
SLC022 644 166 810
SLC023 520 154 674
SLC024 145 41 186
SLC025 9 11 20
SLC026 57 9 66
SLC027 106 29 135
SLC028 236 190 426
SLC029 104 58 162
SLC030 119 43 162
SLC031 361 136 497
SLC032 266 150 416
SLC033 202 74 276
SLC034 465 193 658
SLC035 420 139 559
SLC036 582 147 729
SLC037 597 197 794
SLC038 142 133 275
SLC039 197 121 318
SLC040 228 98 326
SLC041 365 108 473
SLC042 456 190 646
SLC043 391 163 554
SLC044 352 93 445
SLC045 478 145 623
SLC046 504 173 677
SLC047 93 18 111
SLC048 327 92 419
SLC049 430 134 564
SLC050 400 136 536
SLC051 290 139 429
SLC052 234 154 388
SLC053 309 100 409
SLC054 282 138 420
SLC055 272 93 365
SLC056 520 139 659
SLC057 478 155 633
SLC058 460 140 600
SLC059 548 166 714
SLC060 103 38 141
SLC061 477 218 695
SLC062 377 165 542
SLC063 7 2 9
SLC064 56 16 72
SLC065 297 203 500
SLC066 164 134 298
SLC067 141 72 213
SLC068 286 82 368
SLC069 383 123 506
SLC070 501 127 628
SLC071 546 135 681
SLC072 544 146 690
SLC073 450 129 579
SLC074 601 169 770
SLC075 670 251 921
SLC076 480 172 652
SLC077 634 268 902
SLC078 172 149 321
SLC079 159 167 326
SLC080 250 119 369
SLC081 221 101 322
SLC082 491 151 642
SLC083 441 133 574
SLC084 505 133 638
SLC085 473 140 613
SLC086 461 117 578
SLC087 638 157 795
SLC088 688 259 947
SLC089 565 266 831
SLC090 393 175 568
SLC091 523 179 702
SLC092 370 200 570
SLC093 314 126 440
SLC094 314 153 467
SLC095 487 169 656
SLC096 51 13 64
SLC097 382 110 492
SLC098 361 f137 498
SLC099 395 137 532
SLC100 407 136 543
SLC101 392 110 502
SLC102 630 164 794
SLC103 333 145 478
SLC104 542 199 741
SLC105 126 64 190
SLC106 375 175 550
SLC107 373 166 539
SLC108 392 192 584
SLC109 271 131 402
SLC110 193 59 252
SLC111 465 99 564
SLC112 305 146 451
SLC113 422 227 649
SLC114 364 202 566
SLC115 383 143 526
SLC116 6 2 8
SLC117 397 182 579
SLC118 495 198 693
SLC119 613 274 887
SLC120 293 152 445
SLC121 140 54 194
SLC122 152 77 229
SLC123 460 216 676
SLC124 313 137 450
SLC125 546 238 784
SLC126 259 153 412
SLC127 11 3 14
SLC128 36 17 53
SLC129 5 3 8
TOTAL 44,513 17,899 64,412
CONCLUSION:
In conclusion, the Salt Lake City Bond Proposition, known as the Salt Lake City Parks, Trails and Open
Space General Obligation Bond, passed with 71.32% of voters voting for the issuance of bonds. It is our
recommendation that the Salt Lake City Council passes the resolution confirming this amount.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Election Summary Report
Attachment B: 2022 General Election Canvass Statistics
Attachment C: Proceeding Resolution
Candidate Total
FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
BONDS 44,513 71.32%
AGAINST THE ISSUANCE OF
BONDS 17,899 28.68%
Total Votes 62,412
Total
SALT LAKE CITY BOND PROPOSITION (Vote for 1)
Ballots Cast: 384,564
FINAL OFFICIAL ELECTION RESULTS
2022 GENERAL ELECTION
SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH
Date: 11-22-2022
11/22/2022 12:52:37 PMPage: 1 of 1
97,943
68,034 69.5%
62,772 92.3%
1,045 1.7%
*Returned Unsigned 83
*Signatures Did Not Match the Voter Record 510
*Identification Not Provided 3
*Empty Envelopes -
Deceased Voter -
Ballots Postmark Invalid/Received Late 449
Cure Letters Sent 1,104 1.8%
Ballots Cured 508 46.0%
5,262 7.7%
1,279 1.9%
1,166 91.2%
Same Day Registration (No Prior Registration)991
113
Voted Previously 2
Not Eligible for Ballot Issued 22
Incomplete/Invalid Registration 36
No Proof of Residency 53
Number of Election Day Vote Centers 42
Number of Early Voting Locations 8
Number of Vote Center Workers 260
Number of ICX machines deployed 690
Provisional Ballots Counted
* Voters were notified and provided an opportunity to rectify their ballots.
Provisional Ballots Not Accepted
Vote Centers and Workers
Cure Letters
Voted in Person
Provisional Ballots Issued
2022 General Election Canvass Statistics
Eligible Registered Voters
Ballots Counted
By Mail Ballots Counted
By Mail Ballots Not Accepted (not counted)
Canvass Proceedings (11-22-2022) 4890-5506-2315 v4.docx
8711038/RDB/mo
Salt Lake City, Utah
November 22, 2022
The City Council (the “City Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), met in special
public session on November 22, 2022, in Room 326 in the City and County Building, 451 South
State Street, in Salt Lake City, Utah, at 7:00 p.m., due, legal and timely notice of the meeting
having been given to all members as required by law.
The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Mano. The following members,
constituting a quorum, were present:
Daniel Dugan Council Chair
Darin Mano Council Vice Chair
Amy Fowler Council Member
Victoria Petro-Eschler Council Member
Analia Valdemoros Council Member
Chris Wharton Council Member
Absent: Alejandro Puy
There were also present:
Katherine N. Lewis City Attorney
Cindy Lou Trishman City Recorder.
The City Recorder presented to the City Council an affidavit evidencing the giving of not
less than 24 hours’ public notice of the agenda, date, time and place of the November 22, 2022
special meeting of the City Council in compliance with the requirements of Section 52-4-202, Utah
Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Utah Code”), by (1) posting written notice of the special
meeting at the principal office of the City Council, (2) providing notice to at least one newspaper
of general circulation within the geographic jurisdiction of the City or to a local media
correspondent, and (3) posting written notice of the meeting on the Utah Public Notice Website.
The affidavit was ordered recorded in the minutes of the meeting and is as follows:
- 2 - Canvass Proceedings
STATE OF UTAH )
)
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the duly qualified and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah
(the “City”), do hereby certify, according to the records of the City in my official possession, and
upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the requirements of Section 52-4-202,
Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, I gave not less than twenty-four (24) hours’ public notice
of the agenda, date, time, and place of the November 22, 2022, special public meeting held by the
City Council of the City (the “City Council”), by:
(a) causing a Notice of Public Meeting to be posted at the principal office of
the City Council at Room 326, City and County Building, 451 South State Street, in Salt
Lake City, Utah, on November 17, 2022 (and revised on November 21, 2022), at least
twenty-four (24) hours before the convening of the meeting, in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit A; said Notice of Public Meeting having continuously remained so posted and
available for public inspection during regular office hours until the convening of th e
meeting:
(b) causing a copy of the Notice of Public Meeting in the form attached hereto
as Exhibit A to be provided on November 17, 2022 (and revised on November 21, 2022),
at least twenty-four (24) hours before the convening of the meeting, to The Salt Lake
Tribune and the Deseret News, newspapers of general circulation within the geographic
jurisdiction of the City; and
(c) causing a Notice of Public Meeting to be posted on November 17, 2022
(and revised on November 21, 2022), on the Utah Public Notice Website, in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit B, at least twenty-four (24) hours before the convening of the
meeting.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature and impressed
hereon the official seal of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 22nd day of November, 2022.
_______________________________________
Cindy Lou Trishman
City Recorder
[SEAL]
Exhibit A Canvass Proceedings
EXHIBIT A
[ATTACH NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING]
Exhibit B Canvass Proceedings
EXHIBIT B
[ATTACH NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING ON UTAH PUBLIC NOTICE WEBSITE]
-5-Canvass Proceedings
It was noted that, as required by Section 52-4-203 of the Utah Code, written minutes and a
recording of this meeting are being kept.
Vice Chair Mano announced that one purpose of the meeting was to canvass the results of
the special bond election held in the City on Tuesday, November 8, 2022 (the “Special Bond
Election”), at the same time as the statewide regular general election, on the question of the
issuance of $85,000,000 general obligation bonds of the City. The City Council convened as a
board of canvassers (the “Board of Canvassers”).
The City Recorder presented to the Board of Canvassers the election results of the Special
Bond Election (the “Election Results”) on the proposition hereinafter set forth, such results having
been provided by the County Clerk (the “County Clerk”) of Salt Lake County, Utah (the
“County”), and printed by the apparatus used to tabulate the Election Results of such Special Bond
Election.
The Election Results printed by the tabulating apparatus included a count of the votes cast
at the Special Bond Election by valid absentee b allots and provisional ballots received by the
County Clerk as required by law. The Election Results were ordered filed with the official records
of the City Council.
It was thereupon moved by Council Member ________, seconded by Council Member
__________ and carried that the Board of Canvassers publicly proceed to canvass and declare the
results of the Special Bond Election. The Election Results of the Special Bond Election were then
canvassed by the Board of Canvassers.
After canvassing the results of the Special Bond Election, the Board of Canvassers
thereupon adjourned and convened as the City Council.
-6-Canvass Proceedings
The following resolution was thereupon introduced in written form for consideration by
the City Council. After due consideration of the resolution by the City Council, Council Member
___________ moved for its adoption, and Council Member __________ seconded the motion. On
being put to a vote, the motion was carried by the following vote:
AYE: _______________
_______________
_______________
_______________
_______________
_______________
_______________
NAY: _______________.
The resolution is as follows:
-7-Canvass Proceedings
RESOLUTION __ OF 2022
A RESOLUTION finding and promulgating the results of a special
bond election held in Salt Lake City, Utah, on November 8, 2022 to
determine the issuance of $85,000,000 General Obligation Bonds of
the City Council; ratifying and confirming acts done in connection
therewith; and providing for related matters.
*********
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions duly adopted on August 16, 2022, and September 6,
2022, a special bond election was called by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City
Council”), to be held on November 8, 2022 (the “Special Bond Election”), at the same time as the
statewide regular general election, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified, registered electors
of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), the proposition hereinafter set forth;
WHEREAS, the Special Bond Election was duly and regularly held and the election results
thereof on the proposition have been counted and tabulated by the tabulating apparatus used in
conjunction with the Special Bond Election;
WHEREAS, the election results printed by the tabulating apparatus used to count the votes
cast at the Special Bond Election (including any vote by absentee ballot counted with the other
ballots cast, to which have been added votes validly cast by additional abse ntee ballots and
provisional ballots) have been certified by the City Council as the official election results for the
Special Bond Election;
WHEREAS, a majority of the qualified, registered electors of the City who voted at the
Special Bond Election voted in favor of the bonds described in the proposition hereinafter set forth,
and the election results of the Special Bond Election have today been officially canvassed by this
City Council, acting as the Board of Canvassers, and declared to have resulted in favor of the
approval of such proposition; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires now to make the official findings required by Section
11-14-207 of Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Utah Code”).
NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows:
Section 1. There having been furnished to the City Council the election results of the
Special Bond Election held in the City on November 8, 2022, printed by the tabulating apparatus
employed in conjunction therewith, it is hereby officially found, determined and declared that, as
to the proposition set forth in full in Section 2 of this Resolution, 62,412 votes were cast (including
the provisional ballots referenced below and ballots that were included in the affirmativ e or
negative votes for various reasons), of which 44,513 votes were in the affirmative and 17,899 votes
were in the negative, including 1,279 provisional ballots that were issued and 1,166 provisional
ballots that were valid and therefore counted. Additionally, 1,045 by--mail ballots were not
counted.
-8-Canvass Proceedings
Section 2. At the Special Bond Election on the proposition appearing below, a majority
of the qualified, registered electors of the City voting on the following proposition and a majority
of the qualified, registered electors of the City receiving ballots have approved the issuance of the
bonds described in such proposition:
Shall Salt Lake City, Utah, be authorized to issue General Obligation Bonds in a principal amount
not to exceed $85,000,000 and to mature in no more than 21 years from the date or dates of
issuance; such bonds will be issued in accordance with Utah law solely to pay all or a portion of
the costs to acquire, improve, renovate and upgrade various parks, trails, ope n space and related
facilities and recreational amenities?
Property Tax Cost of Bonds:
If the bonds are issued as planned, without regard to the taxes currently levied to pay outstanding
bonds that will decrease over time, an annual property tax to pay debt service on the proposed
bonds will be required over a period of 20 years in the estimated amount of $53.80 per year on a
primary residence with the Salt Lake City average value of $576,000 and in the estimated amount
of $97.83 per year on a business or secondary residence having the same value.
The City currently levies property taxes to pay debt service on other outstanding general obligation
bonds that have been issued to finance voter approved projects. The incremental prope rty taxes
would decrease upon the repayment of the currently outstanding bonds, but the decrease will not
occur if the proposed bonds are issued. Taking into account the repayment of the outstanding bonds,
the City expects that the issuance of the proposed bonds, in the manner currently expected, will
result in no net increase to current annual property tax levels for the repayment of bonds.
The foregoing information is only an estimate and not a limit on the amount of taxes that the City
may be required to levy to pay debt service on the bonds. The City is obligated to levy taxes to the
extent provided by law in order to pay the bonds. The amounts are based on various assumptions
and estimates, including debt service on the bonds and taxable values of property in the City.
To vote in favor of the proposed bonds, select the box immediately
adjacent to the words “FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS.” To vote
against the proposed bonds, select the box immediately adjacent to the
words “AGAINST THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS .”
FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS
AGAINST THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS
Therefore, the City Council is authorized to proceed with the issuance of the bonds specified in
the foregoing proposition.
Section 3. The election results printed by the tabulating apparatus employed to count
and tabulate the votes cast at the Special Bond Election (including any vote by absentee ballot
counted with the other ballots cast and to which have been added votes validly cast by additional
absentee ballots and provisional ballots), a true and correct copy of such election results being
attached hereto as Annex 1, are hereby certified by the City Council as the official election results
for the Special Bond Election from each and every voting center established for the Special Bond
Election.
-9- Canvass Proceedings
Section 4. The City Council hereby ratifies, confirms, approves and finds to be in all
respects regular and in compliance with law all (i) proceedings taken, (ii) acts performed, (iii)
notices given, (iv) ballots prepared, (v) absentee ballots and provisional ballot envelopes printed,
(vi) election officials appointed, including the election officials appointed to test the voting devices
used in the Special Bond Election and to test and operate the tabulating apparatus employed to
count the votes cast at the Special Bond Election, (vii) voting centers used and (viii) things done
in connection with the calling, giving notice and holding of the Special Bond Election and the
counting of the votes cast at the Special Bond Election in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 4, Title 20A of the Utah Code.
Section 5. The City Council, having adopted this Resolution pursuant to the provisions
of Section 11-14-207 of the Utah Code, determining that a majority of the qualified, registered
electors of the City voting on the aforesaid proposition approved the issuance of such bonds, the
City Council is, therefore, authorized to proceed to issue the bonds voted at the Special Bond
Election as permitted in Section 11-14-301 and in Chapter 27 of Title 11 of the Utah Code.
Section 6. The bonds approved at the Special Bond Election shall be sold as provided
by law.
Section 7. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption.
(Signature page follows.)
-10-Canvass Proceedings
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 22nd day of November, 2022.
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
By ____________________________________
Chair, City Council
[SEAL]
COUNTERSIGN AND ATTEST:
By _______________________________
City Recorder
-11- Canvass Proceedings
(Other business not pertinent to the above appears in the minutes of the meeting.)
Pursuant to motion duly made and carried, the meeting was adjourned.
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
By ____________________________________
Chair, City Council
[SEAL]
ATTEST:
By _______________________________
City Recorder
-12-Canvass Proceedings
STATE OF UTAH )
)
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the duly qualified and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah
(the “City”), do hereby certify, according to the records of said City in my official possession, that
the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the extracts of minutes of a special public meeting
of the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) held on November 22, 2022, including a
resolution adopted at the meeting, as recorded in the regular official b ook of minutes of the
proceedings of the City Council kept in my office, that all members were given due, legal and
timely notice of said meeting, that the meeting therein shown was in all respects called, held and
conducted in accordance with law and in full conformity therewith, and that the persons therein
named were present at the meeting, as therein shown.
I further certify that attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the ballot
sheet that was prepared for use in casting a vote by me ans of an absentee ballot or provisional
ballot at the November 8, 2022 special bond election held in the City and that was taken from the
same printing as the ballot sheets actually used at that election. I further certify that a true and
correct copy of the electronic ballot that was prepared for use in casting a vote by means of the
direct electronic voting device at the November 8, 2022 special bond election held in the City was
in the same form as the ballot sheet attached as Exhibit A hereto, excluding the section entitled
“Instructions to Voters.”
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunder set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, at Salt Lake City, Utah, this 22nd day of November, 2022.
_______________________________________
Cindy Lou Trishman
City Recorder
[SEAL]
Annex 1 Canvass Proceedings
ANNEX 1
[ATTACH COPY OF ELECTION RESULTS]
Exhibit A Canvass Proceedings
EXHIBIT A
[ATTACH ORIGINAL “PAPER” BALLOT AND BALLOT SHEET]
TEST 2022-09-16 15:53:31
FEDERAL
STATE
COUNTY
COUNTY
JUDICIAL RETENTION
Visit judges.utah.gov to learn about
the Judicial Performance Evaluation
Commission's recommendations for
each judge.
U.S. SENATE
Vote for One
EVAN MCMULLIN (UNA)
JAMES ARTHUR HANSEN (LIB)
MIKE LEE (REP)
TOMMY WILLIAMS (IAP)
WRITE-IN:
U.S. HOUSE
DISTRICT #2
Vote for One
NICK MITCHELL (DEM)
JAYMAC MCFARLAND (UUP)
CASSIE EASLEY (CON)
CHRIS STEWART (REP)
STATE TREASURER
Vote for One
MARLO M. OAKS (REP)
THOMAS ALAN HORNE (UUP)
WARREN T ROGERS (IAP)
JOSEPH GEDDES BUCHMAN (LIB)
UTAH STATE HOUSE
DISTRICT #21
Vote for One
SANDRA HOLLINS (DEM)
DAVID C ATKIN (REP)
STATE SCHOOL BOARD
DISTRICT #4
Vote for One
LEANN WOOD (REP)
COUNTY COUNCIL
AT-LARGE B
Vote for One
SUZANNE HARRISON (DEM)
RICHARD SNELGROVE (REP)
COUNTY COUNCIL
DISTRICT #1
Vote for One
ARLYN BRADSHAW (DEM)
RICHARD D.M. BARNES (REP)
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Vote for One
SIM GILL (DEM)
DANIELLE AHN (REP)
COUNTY AUDITOR
Vote for One
DAVID M. MUIR (UUP)
CHRIS HARDING (REP)
COUNTY CLERK
Vote for One
GOUD MARAGANI (REP)
LANNIE CHAPMAN (DEM)
COUNTY SHERIFF
Vote for One
NICHOLAS J ROBERTS (REP)
ROSIE RIVERA (DEM)
Shall PAIGE PETERSEN be retained in the
office of Justice of the Supreme Court of
Utah?
YES
NO
Shall ADAM T. MOW be retained in the
office of Judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall AMBER M. METTLER be retained in
the office of Judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall BARRY G. LAWRENCE be retained in
the office of Judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall CHELSEA KOCH be retained in the
office of Judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall DIANNA M. GIBSON be retained in the
office of judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall JAMES T. BLANCH be retained in the
office of Judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall LINDA JONES be retained in the
office of Judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall MARK S. KOURIS be retained in the
office of Judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall PATRICK W. CORUM be retained in
the office of Judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
VOTE BOTH SIDES >>
OFFICIAL GENERAL BALLOT
SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022
CERTIFIED BY THE CLERK OF SALT LAKE COUNTY
Ballot Type 131 - English -
SLC001
INSTRUCTIONS:
Use only a black or blue pen. To vote your choice, completely fill in the oval next to your
selection. If you make a mistake, mark the ballot so that your intent is clear. DO NOT initial
or sign a correction. (For additional directions, refer to the instructions included in your
ballot packet.)
If you choose not to vote in every contest, it will not invalidate your ballot.
WRITE-IN: A write-in line is only available where a candidate has filed a Declaration of
Write-In Candidacy. To vote for a write-in candidate, fill in the oval to the left of the write-in
line and print the name of the candidate you want to vote for. We will consider voter intent
if the complete name of the candidate is not entered.
WITHDRAWN CANDIDATES: Please check www.slco.vote for the names of candidates
who have withdrawn after ballots were printed.
RETURNING BALLOT: Only fold your ballot along existing fold lines. Place the security
sleeve containing your ballot into YOUR ballot return envelope. (Be sure to use the return
envelope with YOUR name!) Sign your return ballot envelope affidavit.
Political Party Abbreviations
CON=Constitution DEM=Democratic IAP=Independent American LIB=Libertarian REP=Republican UUP=United Utah
UNA=Unaffiliated candidates are not affiliated with a state registered political party
NOTE: Candidate party affiliations (where applicable) are listed next to the candidate's name. Voters may vote for any candidate of any
party regardless of their party affiliation.
TEST 2022-09-16 15:53:32
FEDERAL
ESTADO
CONDADO
CONDADO
RETENCIÓN JUDICIAL
Visite judges.utah.gov para
aprender más sobre las
recomendaciones de La Comisión
para la Evaluación del Desempeño
Judicial por cada juez.
SENADO DE EE. UU.
Vote por Uno
EVAN MCMULLIN (UNA)
JAMES ARTHUR HANSEN (LIB)
MIKE LEE (REP)
TOMMY WILLIAMS (IAP)
POR ESCRITO:
REPRESENTANTE DE EE. UU.
DISTRITO #2
Vote por Uno
NICK MITCHELL (DEM)
JAYMAC MCFARLAND (UUP)
CASSIE EASLEY (CON)
CHRIS STEWART (REP)
TESORERO DEL ESTADO
Vote por Uno
MARLO M. OAKS (REP)
THOMAS ALAN HORNE (UUP)
WARREN T ROGERS (IAP)
JOSEPH GEDDES BUCHMAN (LIB)
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL
DE UTAH
DISTRITO #21
Vote por Uno
SANDRA HOLLINS (DEM)
DAVID C ATKIN (REP)
JUNTA ESCOLAR DEL ESTADO
DISTRITO #4
Vote por Uno
LEANN WOOD (REP)
CONSEJO DEL CONDADO EN
GENERAL B
Vote por Uno
SUZANNE HARRISON (DEM)
RICHARD SNELGROVE (REP)
CONSEJO DEL CONDADO
DISTRITO #1
Vote por Uno
ARLYN BRADSHAW (DEM)
RICHARD D.M. BARNES (REP)
FISCAL DE DISTRITO DEL
CONDADO
Vote por Uno
SIM GILL (DEM)
DANIELLE AHN (REP)
AUDITOR DEL CONDADO
Vote por Uno
DAVID M. MUIR (UUP)
CHRIS HARDING (REP)
SECRETARIO DEL CONDADO
Vote por Uno
GOUD MARAGANI (REP)
LANNIE CHAPMAN (DEM)
ALGUACIL DEL CONDADO
Vote por Uno
NICHOLAS J ROBERTS (REP)
ROSIE RIVERA (DEM)
Debe Jueza PAIGE PETERSEN ser retenido
en el cargo de Tribunal Supremo de Utah?
SÍ
NO
Debe Juez ADAM T. MOW ser retenido en
el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito del Tercer
Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Jueza AMBER M. METTLER ser
retenido en el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito
del Tercer Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Juez BARRY G. LAWRENCE ser
retenido en el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito
del Tercer Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Jueza CHELSEA KOCH ser retenido
en el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito del
Tercer Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Jueza DIANNA M. GIBSON ser
retenido en el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito
del Tercer Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Juez JAMES T. BLANCH ser retenido
en el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito del
Tercer Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Jueza LINDA JONES ser retenido en
el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito del Tercer
Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
VOTE LOS DOS LADOS >>
BOLETA GENERAL OFICIAL
CONDADO DE SALT LAKE, UTAH
MARTES, 8 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2022
CERTIFICADO POR EL SECRETARIO DEL CONDADO
DE SALT LAKE
Ballot Type 131 - Spanish -
SLC001
INSTRUCCIONES TRADICIONALES:
Use solamente un bolígrafo negro o azul. Para votar su elección, rellene completamente
el óvalo al lado su selección. Si usted comete un error, marque la boleta para que su
intención sea clara. NO ponga sus iniciales ni firme una corrección. (Para obtener
instrucciones adicionales, consulte a las instrucciones incluidas en su paquete de boleta.)
Si decide no votar en cada contenida, no invalidará su boleta.
POR ESCRITO: Una línea para escribir el nombre de un candidato por escrito esta
disponible solamente donde un candidato haya presentado una Declaración de
Candidatura Por Escrito. Para votar por un candidato por escrito, rellene el óvalo a la
izquierda de la línea de escritura y escribe el nombre del candidato por el que desea
votar. Consideraremos la intención del elector si no se ingrese el nombre complete del
candidato.
CANDIDATOS RETIRADOS: Por favor, consulte www.slco.vote para ver los nombres de los
candidatos que se han retirado después de que se imprimieron las boletas.
DEVOLVIENDO LA BOLETA: Doble su boleta solamente a lo largo de la líneas de doblez
existentes. Coloque la funda de seguridad que contiene su boleta en SU sobre de
devolución de boletas. (¡Asegúrese de usar el sobre de devolución con SU nombre!) Firme
la declaración jurada de sobre de devolución de boletas.
Abreviaturas de Partido Político
CON=Constitución DEM=Demócrata IAP=Americano Independiente LIB=Libertario REP=Republicano UUP=Unido Utah
UNA=Candidatos sin afiliación no están con un partido político registrado con el estado
NOTA: Las afiliaciones a los partidos políticos de candidatos (cuando corresponda) se enumeran junto al nombre del candidato. Los
electores pueden votar por cualquier candidato de cualquier partido independientemente de su afiliación al partido político.
TEST 2022-09-16 15:53:32
RETENCIÓN JUDICIAL
Visite judges.utah.gov para
aprender más sobre las
recomendaciones de La Comisión
para la Evaluación del Desempeño
Judicial por cada juez.
ENMIENDA
CONSTITUCIONAL A
CUESTIONES LOCALES
BOLETA OFICIAL DE
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
ELECCIÓN DEL BONO
ESPECIAL
/s/ CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
REGISTRADORA DE SALT LAKE CITY
Debe Juez MARK S. KOURIS ser retenido
en el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito del
Tercer Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Juez PATRICK W. CORUM ser
retenido en el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito
del Tercer Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Juez PAUL BOYD PARKER ser
retenido en el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito
del Tercer Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Juez RANDALL N. SKANCHY ser
retenido en el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito
del Tercer Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Juez RICHARD E. MRAZIK ser
retenido en el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito
del Tercer Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Juez ROBERT P. FAUST ser retenido
en el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito del
Tercer Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Jueza VERNICE S. TREASE ser
retenido en el cargo de Tribunal Del Distrito
del Tercer Distrito Judicial?
SÍ
NO
Debe Juez SCOTT J MICKELSEN ser
retenido en el cargo de Tribunal de Justicia
de la Ciudad de Bluffdale?
SÍ
NO
Debe Jueza SHAUNA M.
GRAVES-ROBERTSON ser retenido en el
cargo de Tribunal de Justicia del Condado
de Salt Lake?
SÍ
NO
Debe Juez CLEMENS LANDAU ser retenido
en el cargo de Tribunal de Justicia del
Condado de Salt Lake?
SÍ
NO
Debe Jueza JEANNE ROBISON ser
retenido en el cargo de Tribunal de Justicia
del Condado de Salt Lake?
SÍ
NO
Debe Jueza KATHERINE PETERS ser
retenido en el cargo de Tribunal de Justicia
del Condado de Salt Lake?
SÍ
NO
Debe Jueza SYDNEY MAGID ser retenido
en el cargo de Tribunal de Justicia del
Condado de Salt Lake?
SÍ
NO
¿Se debería enmendar la Constitución de
Utah para cambiar una disposición relativa a
las sesiones especiales de la Legislatura de
Utah que son convocados por el presidente
del Senado de Utah y el presidente de la
Cámara de Representantes de Utah:
para aumentar el límite de la cantidad ·
total de dinero que la Legislatura puede
apropiar durante la sesión de una
cantidad igual al 1% de la cantidad total
asignada durante el año fiscal anterior a
la cantidad igual al 5% de la cantidad
total asignada durante el año fiscal
anterior; y
para excluir de ese límite del 5%:·
una asignación de dinero que el ·
estado recibe del gobierno federal
para hacer frente a una emergencia
crisis fiscal, de salud pública u otra ·
emergencia; y
una asignación que disminuye la ·
cantidad de dinero previamente
autorizada para ser gastada?
A FAVOR
EN CONTRA
¿Se autorizará a Salt Lake City, Utah, a
emitir Bonos de Obligación General en una
cantidad que no exceda los $85,000,000 y
que venzan en no más de 21 años a partir
de la fecha o fechas de emisión; dichos
bonos se emitirán de acuerdo con la ley de
Utah únicamente para pagar la totalidad o
una parte de los costos para mejorar los
parques, senderos, espacios abiertos y las
instalaciones y servicios recreativos de
propiedad de la ciudad?
Costo del Impuesto Sobre la Propiedad de
los Bonos:
Si los bonos se emiten según lo planeado,
independientemente de los impuestos
actualmente recaudados por los bonos
pendientes que se reducirán con el tiempo,
se requerirá un impuesto anual sobre la
propiedad para pagar el servicio de la deuda
de los bonos propuestos durante un período
de 20 años en la cantidad estimada de
$53.80 por año para una residencia principal
con el valor promedio de Salt Lake City de
$576,000 y en la cantidad estimada de
$97.83 por año para un local comercial o
residencia secundaria que tenga el mismo
valor.
La Ciudad actualmente recauda impuestos
sobre la propiedad para pagar el servicio de
la deuda de otros bonos de obligación
general pendientes que se han emitido para
financiar proyectos aprobados por los
votantes. Los impuestos incrementales sobre
la propiedad disminuirían con el pago de los
bonos actualmente en circulación, pero la
disminución no ocurrirá si se emiten los
bonos propuestos. Teniendo en cuenta el
reembolso de los bonos pendientes, la
Ciudad espera que la emisión de los bonos
propuestos, en la forma prevista
actualmente, no resultará en un aumento
neto de los niveles anuales de impuestos
sobre la propiedad para el reembolso de los
bonos.
La información anterior es sola una
estimación y no un límite en la cantidad de
impuestos que la Ciudad puede ser obligada
a recaudar para pagar el servicio de la
deuda de los bonos. La Ciudad está obligada
a recaudar impuestos en la medida prevista
por la ley para pagar los bonos. Los montos
se basan en varias suposiciones y
estimaciones, incluido el servicio de la deuda
de los bonos y los valores sujetos a
impuestos de la propiedad en la Ciudad.
Para votar a favor de los bonos propuestos,
seleccione el recuadro que aparece junto a
la frase “A FAVOR DE LA EMISITÓN DE
LOS BONOS.” Para votar en contra de los
bonos propuestos, seleccione el recuadro
que aparece junto a la frase “EN CONTRA
DE LA EMISIÓN DE LOS BONOS.”
A FAVOR DE LA EMISIÓN DE LOS
BONOS
EN CONTRA DE LA EMISIÓN DE
LOS BONOS
VOTE LOS DOS LADOS >>
FINAL DE LA BOLETA
TEST 2022-09-16 15:53:31
JUDICIAL RETENTION
Visit judges.utah.gov to learn about
the Judicial Performance Evaluation
Commission's recommendations for
each judge.
STATE CONSTITUTIONAL
AMENDMENT A
LOCAL QUESTIONS
OFFICIAL BALLOT FOR
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
SPECIAL BOND ELECTION
/s/ CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDERShall PAUL BOYD PARKER be retained in
the office of Judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall RANDALL N. SKANCHY be retained
in the office of Judge of the District Court of
the Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall RICHARD E. MRAZIK be retained in
the office of Judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall ROBERT P. FAUST be retained in the
office of Judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall VERNICE S. TREASE be retained in
the office of Judge of the District Court of the
Third Judicial District?
YES
NO
Shall SCOTT J MICKELSEN be retained in
the office of Justice Court Judge of Bluffdale?
YES
NO
Shall SHAUNA M. GRAVES-ROBERTSON
be retained in the office of Justice Court
Judge of Salt Lake County?
YES
NO
Shall CLEMENS LANDAU be retained in the
office of Justice Court Judge of Salt Lake
City?
YES
NO
Shall JEANNE ROBISON be retained in the
office of Justice Court Judge of Salt Lake
City?
YES
NO
Shall KATHERINE PETERS be retained in
the office of Justice Court Judge of Salt Lake
City?
YES
NO
Shall SYDNEY MAGID be retained in the
office of Justice Court Judge of Salt Lake
City?
YES
NO
Shall the Utah Constitution be amended to
change a provision relating to special
sessions of the Utah Legislature that are
convened by the president of the Utah
Senate and speaker of the Utah House of
Representatives:
to increase the limit on the total amount ·
of money the Legislature may
appropriate during the session from an
amount equal to 1% of the total amount
appropriated during the preceding fiscal
year to an amount equal to 5% of the
total amount appropriated during the
preceding fiscal year; and
to exclude from that 5% limit: ·
an appropriation of money that the ·
state receives from the federal
government to address a fiscal,
public health, or other emergency
or crisis; and
an appropriation that decreases ·
the amount of money previously
authorized to be spent.
FOR
AGAINST
Shall Salt Lake City, Utah, be authorized to
issue General Obligation Bonds in a principal
amount not to exceed $85,000,000 and to
mature in no more than 21 years from the
date or dates of issuance; such bonds will be
issued in accordance with Utah law solely to
pay all or a portion of the costs to acquire,
improve, renovate and upgrade various
parks, trails, open space and related facilities
and recreational amenities?
Property Tax Cost of Bonds:
If the bonds are issued as planned, without
regard to the taxes currently levied to pay
outstanding bonds that will decrease over
time, an annual property tax to pay debt
service on the proposed bonds will be
required over a period of 20 years in the
estimated amount of $53.80 per year on a
primary residence with the Salt Lake City
average value of $576,000 and in the
estimated amount of $97.83 per year on a
business or secondary residence having the
same value.
The City currently levies property taxes to
pay debt service on other outstanding
general obligation bonds that have been
issued to finance voter approved projects.
The incremental property taxes would
decrease upon the repayment of the
currently outstanding bonds, but the
decrease will not occur if the proposed
bonds are issued. Taking into account the
repayment of the outstanding bonds, the City
expects that the issuance of the proposed
bonds, in the manner currently expected, will
result in no net increase to current annual
property tax levels for the repayment of
bonds.
The foregoing information is only an estimate
and not a limit on the amount of taxes that
the City may be required to levy to pay debt
service on the bonds. The City is obligated to
levy taxes to the extent provided by law in
order to pay the bonds. The amounts are
based on various assumptions and
estimates, including debt service on the
bonds and taxable values of property in the
City.
To vote in favor of the proposed bonds,
select the box immediately adjacent to the
words “FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS.”
To vote against the proposed bonds, select
the box immediately adjacent to the words
“AGAINST THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS.”
FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS
AGAINST THE ISSUANCE OF
BONDS
VOTE BOTH SIDES >>
END OF BALLOT
Item E2
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
WWW.COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022 – 6:00PM
RE: Temporary Land Use Regulation
Motion 1 –
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance enacting a temporary zoning regulation
authorizing the temporary increase in the overnight capacity by up to 20 individuals, at the
Volunteers of America Youth Homeless Resource Center, located at approximately 888 South
400 west.
Motion 2 –
I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ____ of 2022
(An Ordinance Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations
Authorizing Temporary Increase in Overnight Capacity at the
Youth Homeless Resource Center at 888 S 400 W)
WHEREAS, Section 10-9a-504 of the Utah Code permits a municipality, without prior
consideration and recommendation from the municipality’s planning commission, to
enact a temporary land use regulation for any part or all of a municipality if the governing body
makes a finding of compelling countervailing public interest; and
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2014, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission granted a
conditional use permit to Volunteers of America to operate a thirty bed homeless youth shelter at
888 S 400 W (the “Shelter”); and
WHEREAS, since 2014 the population of Salt Lake City has significantly increased,
without a commensurate increase in the census for shelter space for homeless youth; and
WHEREAS, despite the efforts at various levels of government, the number of youth
experiencing homelessness and the efforts to address the needs of those youth experiencing
homelessness has been compounded by the economic, humanitarian, and other various rising
social crises; and
WHEREAS, on March 24, 2022, Governor Spencer Cox signed legislation (codified at
Section 35A-16-502) recognizing the need to allow overflow of homeless shelters during
targeted overflow periods; and
WHEREAS, the City concludes that until additional homeless youth resource centers are
opened (or permanent housing is made available) there should be flexibility in temporarily
increasing the overnight capacity at the Shelter; and
2
WHEREAS, the City is committed to ensuring that youth experiencing homelessness
have access to shelter during the winter months when cold temperatures are often extreme during
the night in the Salt Lake Valley; and
WHEREAS, exposure to extreme cold temperatures can cause death, and in the past has
caused deaths among unsheltered persons experiencing homelessness in Salt Lake City and other
nearby communities; and
WHEREAS, this temporary land use regulation is the necessary means to address the
critical need for sheltering youth during imminent extreme weather conditions due to the delay in
expanding the Shelter’s overnight capacity through other procedures set forth in City Code; and
WHEREAS, increasing the overnight capacity at an existing shelter, as opposed to siting
an additional shelter, imposes an lesser impact on the community as a whole; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to allow for a period not to extend past April 15,
2023, no more than twenty additional overnight sleeping accommodations for youth less than
twenty three years old at the Shelter on an emergency basis to provide shelter to youth
experiencing homelessness (a “temporary overflow homeless shelter use”), subject to the
provisions herein; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that protecting lives from the potentially
deadly consequences of severe winter weather and providing housing for the City’s unsheltered
youth during the school year constitutes a compelling, countervailing public interest which
justifies a temporary land use regulation; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council intends for this temporary ordinance to be
effective only during the 2022-2023 winter season and only until April 15, 2023; and
3
WHEREAS, increasing the overnight capacity at the Shelter after this temporary land use
regulation expires may only be granted upon formal modification of the Shelter’s conditional use
permit in accordance with City Code; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages the State, County, public interest
groups, other cities, and community organizations to continue to work together with the City
to proactively address the causes and effects of the myriad of social, economic, humanitarian,
and public health crises that continue to increase the number of individuals experiencing
homelessness and compound the efforts to address the needs of those experiencing
homelessness; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages other cities in Utah to permit youth
shelter locations in their communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Finding of Compelling Countervailing Public Interest. Pursuant to Section
10-9a-504 of the Utah Code, the City Council finds that protecting youth from the potentially
deadly consequences of severe winter weather and providing safe housing during the school year
for the City’s unsheltered youth constitutes a compelling, countervailing public interest sufficient
to justify this temporary land use regulation.
SECTION 2. Location. This temporary land use regulation shall apply to the
property located at 888 S 400 W, which is already operating as a youth homeless shelter.
SECTION 3. Uses Authorized. Increasing the overnight capacity from thirty beds to fifty
beds for homeless youth less than twenty three years old at the location identified in Section 2
above is hereby authorized subject to the conditions listed in Section 4.
4
SECTION 4. Conditions. The temporary increase in the number of beds at the Shelter is
authorized subject to the following:
a. The Shelter shall meet all building and fire code requirements for such use
unless other reasonable means or methods are approved, in writing, by the
Fire Marshal and/or the Chief Building Official. A decision on whether a plan
for alternative means and methods under this section provides sufficient
assurance for life safety protection shall be made in the sole discretion of the
Building Official and/or Fire Marshall and shall not be appealable.
b. Volunteers of America, as the operator, will maintain a staff to client ratio in
compliance with minimums set forth in state licensing code. Security guards
may not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
c. The overnight occupancy, including supervisory staff, shall not exceed the
occupancy limits identified in a temporary certificate of occupancy issued by
the City, but in no case shall the number of overnight occupants exceed fifty
individuals, excluding staff. Such temporary certificate of occupancy must be
issued prior to any overnight occupancy of the building.
d. All other conditions not expressly superseded by this temporary land use
regulation set forth in the conditional use permit issued to the Shelter on
August 27, 2014 remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. Duration. This temporary zoning ordinance shall remain in effect until
April 15, 2023 unless earlier amended, modified, or repealed.
5
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has
been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah
Code §10-3-713.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2022.
______________________________
Dan Dugan, Council Chair
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2022.
Published: ______________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: _________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
Page | 1
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke
Budget & Public Policy Analyst
DATE:November 22, 2022
RE: Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Library Budget Amendment #1
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
At a special meeting on October 26, the Library Board of Directors passed a motion (six in favor, two against and
one absent) to recommend Budget Amendment #1 be adopted by the Salt Lake City Council. The budget
amendment requests $1.3 million from the Library’s Fund Balance (rainy day fund / savings account) to
facilitate the purchase of property. This matter is eligible to be discussed in a closed session per state law.
While the Library has a significant level of independence from the City, and the Library Board is the policy-
making body under state law, the Council is legally designated as the Library’s budget and taxation authority.
Because this budget amendment could potentially affect future budget needs and/or tax rate adjustments,
Council discussion/involvement is appropriate under state law.
The process to-date presents an unusual situation. Purchase of real property is administrative, but only if the
Council has appropriated the full amount of funds for the purchase. In this case, the Council-approved annual
budget for the Library is inadequate to purchase property, although some funds were approved for a potential
lease. In error, the Library Administration signed a contract to purchase property before requesting Library
Board or Council budgetary approval. The signed contract also did not include a clause indicating that the
action was subject to a Council appropriation which is standard practice. As a result, the Library did not have a
budget appropriation at the time it executed the contract, and in order to comply with the Utah Fiscal
Procedures Act, it must seek the Council’s approval of a budget appropriation prior to completing the
acquisition of the property. The Council’s options are as follows: deny the budget amendment, which means
the property acquisition could not proceed, or approve the budget amendment so the property acquisition may
proceed with the required appropriation.
Library’s Fund Balance (proposed funding source for the budget amendment)
The Library’s Fund Balance (separate from the City’s) currently has $7,884,507 which is 27.6% of the Library’s
general budget. There is adequate funding available in the Library’s Fund Balance to cover the proposed
property purchase, but those funds are subject to appropriation by the Council. It is unclear the extent to which
future tax increases may be necessary to cover operations because of this property purchase. It is also unclear
whether using those funds for a property purchase would have an impact on other needs that the Library
expressed when the recent (FY2023) tax increase was recommended by the Library Board, such as repairs or
capital improvements from the Master Facilities Plan previously discussed (which identified over $100 million
in needs), or to keep up with technology and collections content, etc. If the budget amendment is approved,
then the amount would decrease to $6,584,507 or 22%. This is $2 million more than the Library’s 16%
minimum target for Fund Balance which is equivalent to two months of operating costs. Fund Balance is
Project Timeline:
1st Briefing: November 22, 2022
Set Date: November 22, 2022
2nd Briefing: December 6 (if needed)
Public Hearing: December 13, 2022
Potential Action: December 13, 2022
Note: there is no legal deadline by when the
Council must approve or deny the proposal
Page | 2
considered one-time funding because the amount at the end of a fiscal year is unpredictable and there is no
guarantee a similar amount will be available from year to year. The FY2023 annual budget for the Library
includes using $1,163,350 from Fund Balance. The actual Fund Balance at the end of FY2022 was $2 million
larger than estimated during annual budget deliberations.
A Fund Balance +20% of ongoing general revenues is considered healthy. However, it’s important to note that
the dollar amount is insufficient to pay for the $101 million of potential capital improvement projects the
Library identified in the Master Facilities Plan over the next decade. Some of those projects may not be needed
pending further study and deliberations. The City’s financial advisors have recommended that maintaining a
healthy fund balance is important for bond ratings and in case of emergencies and other unforeseen expenses.
ADDITIONIAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Budget and Staffing History: The FY2023 annual budget for the Library included a property tax increase of
$2,782,320. The property tax increase was estimated to be $4.73 per year, per $100,000 of valuation on a primary
residence. For example, the increase was estimated at $18.94 per year for a primary residence valued at $400,000 or
$34.43 per year for a commercial property at the same $400,000 valuation. The last tax increase for the Library
system was five years ago, when the Council approved a roughly $3.9 million property tax increase to account for
ongoing operating costs and debt service for the new Glendale and Marmalade branch libraries. It should be noted
that the Council was central to, and in some cases initiated discussions for property purchase and necessary tax
increases to cover construction and operating expenses for those additional branches. The increase also included
$900,000 for ongoing facilities maintenance and $600,000 ongoing for technology. Fund Balance was used one
year and then a property tax increase was approved to provide ongoing funding. Council staff prepared the below
chart and corresponding data table to provide a summary of the Council approved budgets, total staffing, and
annual changes from Fiscal Year 2016-2023. The chart shows that the Library’s budget increased annually over
eight years. Over the same time, staffing levels increased annually except for a small reduction during 2022.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
$-
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Salt Lake City Public Library Budget & Staffing
Fiscal Years 2016-2023
$ Amount # of FTEs
$ Amount Y ear Ov er
Y ear % Change # of FT Es Y ear Ov er
Y ear % Change
2016 1 6,434 ,464$ -1 91 .5 -
2017 1 8,280,338$ 1 1.2%194 .7 75 1.7%
2018 21,864,096$ 1 9.6%206.55 6.0%
2019 22,286,208$ 1 .9%210.4 25 1.9%
2020 22,371,866$ 0.4%21 5.7 2.5%
2021 24 ,224,962$ 8.3%223.85 3.8%
2022 24,54 8,760$ 1 .3%223.1 5 -0.3%
2023 28,598,885$ 1 6.5%24 1 .45 8.2%
Fiscal Y ear
Budget T otal Staffing
Lisa Shaffer (Nov 7, 2022 09:19 MST)11/07/2022
11/07/2022
Signature:
Email:
Alejandro Sanchez (Nov 7, 2022 09:20 MST)
Alejandro Sanchez
alejandro.sanchez@slcgov.com
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
_______________________ DATE RECEIVED: ___________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer DATE SENT TO COUNCIL: ___________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: November 3, 2023.
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer – Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Appointment, Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officers
STAFF CONTACTS: Jonathan Pappasideris, Division chief – Senior City Attorney
Debra Alexander, Chief Human Resources Officer
Katie Lewis, City Attorney
DOCUMENT TYPE: Appointment, Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officers
RECOMMENDATION:
In accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Salt Lake City Code, which replaced the Salt Lake City Civil Service
Commission and Salt Lake City Employee Appeals Board with disciplinary appeals hearing officers, the
Administration recommends the Council consider the appointment of the five individuals listed below to
serve as disciplinary appeals hearing officers.
Pursuant to Chapter 2.24, the Mayor shall select a roster of between four and six individuals (each of
whom must be an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Utah for a minimum of five years and
who has significant professional experience in employment law) to hear and adjudicate appeals of certain
final disciplinary decisions and present that roster to the City Council for advice and consent. The four
individuals recommended by the Administration are:
• Kirsten R. Allen, Attorney, Fabian VanCott
• Brandon T. Crowther, Attorney, Preston & Scott
• Clinton Drake, City Attorney, Bountiful City
• Bryan M. Scott, Attorney, Preston & Scott
• David Quealy, Deputy City Attorney, City of West Jordan
Lisa Shaffer (Nov 4, 2022 09:34 MDT)11/04/2022
11/04/2022
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
_______________________ DATE RECEIVED: ___________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer DATE SENT TO COUNCIL: ___________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: November 3, 2023.
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer – Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Appointment, Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officers
STAFF CONTACTS: Jonathan Pappasideris, Division chief – Senior City Attorney
Debra Alexander, Chief Human Resources Officer
Katie Lewis, City Attorney
DOCUMENT TYPE: Appointment, Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officers
RECOMMENDATION:
In accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Salt Lake City Code, which replaced the Salt Lake City Civil Service
Commission and Salt Lake City Employee Appeals Board with disciplinary appeals hearing officers, the
Administration recommends the Council consider the appointment of the five individuals listed below to
serve as disciplinary appeals hearing officers.
Pursuant to Chapter 2.24, the Mayor shall select a roster of between four and six individuals (each of
whom must be an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Utah for a minimum of five years and
who has significant professional experience in employment law) to hear and adjudicate appeals of certain
final disciplinary decisions and present that roster to the City Council for advice and consent. The four
individuals recommended by the Administration are:
• Kirsten R. Allen, Attorney, Fabian VanCott
• Brandon T. Crowther, Attorney, Preston & Scott
• Clinton Drake, City Attorney, Bountiful City
• Bryan M. Scott, Attorney, Preston & Scott
• David Quealy, Deputy City Attorney, City of West Jordan
Lisa Shaffer (Nov 4, 2022 09:34 MDT)11/04/2022
11/04/2022
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
_______________________ DATE RECEIVED: ___________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer DATE SENT TO COUNCIL: ___________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: November 3, 2023.
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer – Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Appointment, Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officers
STAFF CONTACTS: Jonathan Pappasideris, Division chief – Senior City Attorney
Debra Alexander, Chief Human Resources Officer
Katie Lewis, City Attorney
DOCUMENT TYPE: Appointment, Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officers
RECOMMENDATION:
In accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Salt Lake City Code, which replaced the Salt Lake City Civil Service
Commission and Salt Lake City Employee Appeals Board with disciplinary appeals hearing officers, the
Administration recommends the Council consider the appointment of the five individuals listed below to
serve as disciplinary appeals hearing officers.
Pursuant to Chapter 2.24, the Mayor shall select a roster of between four and six individuals (each of
whom must be an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Utah for a minimum of five years and
who has significant professional experience in employment law) to hear and adjudicate appeals of certain
final disciplinary decisions and present that roster to the City Council for advice and consent. The four
individuals recommended by the Administration are:
• Kirsten R. Allen, Attorney, Fabian VanCott
• Brandon T. Crowther, Attorney, Preston & Scott
• Clinton Drake, City Attorney, Bountiful City
• Bryan M. Scott, Attorney, Preston & Scott
• David Quealy, Deputy City Attorney, City of West Jordan
Lisa Shaffer (Nov 4, 2022 09:34 MDT)11/04/2022
11/04/2022
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
_______________________ DATE RECEIVED: ___________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer DATE SENT TO COUNCIL: ___________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: November 3, 2023.
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer – Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Appointment, Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officers
STAFF CONTACTS: Jonathan Pappasideris, Division chief – Senior City Attorney
Debra Alexander, Chief Human Resources Officer
Katie Lewis, City Attorney
DOCUMENT TYPE: Appointment, Disciplinary Appeals Hearing Officers
RECOMMENDATION:
In accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Salt Lake City Code, which replaced the Salt Lake City Civil Service
Commission and Salt Lake City Employee Appeals Board with disciplinary appeals hearing officers, the
Administration recommends the Council consider the appointment of the five individuals listed below to
serve as disciplinary appeals hearing officers.
Pursuant to Chapter 2.24, the Mayor shall select a roster of between four and six individuals (each of
whom must be an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Utah for a minimum of five years and
who has significant professional experience in employment law) to hear and adjudicate appeals of certain
final disciplinary decisions and present that roster to the City Council for advice and consent. The four
individuals recommended by the Administration are:
• Kirsten R. Allen, Attorney, Fabian VanCott
• Brandon T. Crowther, Attorney, Preston & Scott
• Clinton Drake, City Attorney, Bountiful City
• Bryan M. Scott, Attorney, Preston & Scott
• David Quealy, Deputy City Attorney, City of West Jordan
Lisa Shaffer (Nov 4, 2022 09:34 MDT)11/04/2022
11/04/2022