12/13/2022 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
FORMAL MEETING
December 13, 2022 Tuesday 7:00 PM
Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in person at
the City & County Building. Learn more at www.slc.gov/council/agendas.
Council Work Room
451 South State Street Room 326
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
SLCCouncil.com
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Dan Dugan, Chair
District 6
Darin Mano, Vice Chair
District 5
Victoria Petro-Eschler
District 1
Alejandro Puy
District 2
Chris Wharton
District 3
Ana Valdemoros
District 4
Amy Fowler
District 7
Generated: 09:56:21
Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet
determined.
WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES
A.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.Council Member Dan Dugan will conduct the formal meeting.
2.Pledge of Allegiance.
3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules.
4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of October 5, 2021, as
well as the formal meeting minutes of May 11, 2021; August 17, 2021; October 12,
2021; and November 10, 2022.
5.Recognition of City Council Member Dan Dugan for his service to Salt Lake City as
2022 Council Chair.
B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Items B1 – B3 will be heard as one public hearing
1. Grant Application: 2022 Brownfields Clean Up Program Grant
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency to the Environmental Protection Agency. If
awarded, the grant would fund the clean-up of hazardous materials resulting from
historical use of property located at 22 South Jeremy Street which is located
within RDA’s North Temple Project Area.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
2. Grant Application: 2022 Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing
Transportation (SMART) Grant
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Division of Transportation to the U.S. Department of Transportation. If awarded,
the grant would fund the purchase of transit signal equipment which will
be installed at 30 intersections along UTA Route 1 within the City boundaries.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
3. Grant Application: 2022 State of Utah ADF Committee DUI
Enforcement Equipment Grant
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Police Department to the State of Utah. If awarded, the grant would fund 14
Portable Breath Testing (PBT) devices. The devices will be ordered by the State
ADF Committee and shipped to the Police Department. The department will not
receive funding for the devices directly.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
4. Ordinance: Library Budget Amendment No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2022-23
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would amend the budget for the Library Fund for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Budget
amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s
budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed
amendment includes appropriating funds to facilitate the purchase of property
among other changes.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
1. Ordinance: Rezone, Master Plan Amendment and Alley Vacation at
1550 S Main Street Assemblage
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Central
Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map and the zoning of the properties at
1518, 1530, 1540, 1546 South Main Street and 1515 South Richards Street from CC
(Corridor Commercial District) and R-1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential
District) to FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood District). The ordinance
would also vacate a city-owned alley situated adjacent to properties located at
1518, 1530, 1540, South Main Street and 1515 South Richards Street. The intent of
these petitions would be to combine all parcels as well as the alley into one
cohesive parcel under the new zoning in order to build a mixed-use/multi-family
development on the site. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to
another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-
1191 and PLNPCM2022-00065 and 00086
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
2. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.4 for Fiscal Year 2022-23
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final
budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal
Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect
adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and
modifications. The proposed amendment includes sales tax revenue bond funds
for critical infrastructure and investments in historic city-owned properties,
additional funding for phase one of creating the Glendale Regional Park, police
officer overtime, renovations to fire stations for gender equity improvements and
emergency rental assistance funds from the U.S. Treasury among other items.
For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY23
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
3. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 675 N F Street –
Capitol Park Cottages – Petitioner: Ivory Development
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of
property at 675 North F Street from FR-3/12,000 (Foothills Residential District)
to SR-1 (Special Development Pattern Residential District). The ordinance would
also amend the Avenues Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map from
Very Low Density to Low Density so that the master plan will correspond with
their requested low-density zone. The requests are intended to accommodate two
pending Planned Development and Subdivision requests from Ivory Development
for a 19-lot single-family dwelling development titled "Capitol Park Cottages."
Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district
with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPC2020-00335/00334
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 18, 2022 and Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
D.COMMENTS:
1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled
for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited
to two minutes.)
E.NEW BUSINESS:
1. Resolution: Naming the Salt Lake City Justice Court Building the
“John L. Baxter Justice Court”
The Council will consider adopting a resolution supporting Mayor Mendenhall
naming the Salt Lake City Justice Court Building the "John L. Baxter Justice
Court." Judge Baxter served Salt Lake City for more than 20 years and was
dedicated to serving some of the most traditionally underserved people in the city,
helping them receive needed support to be successful in society.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1. Resolution: $6 Million Deeply Affordable Housing Grant Awards
The Council will consider a resolution that would adopt funding allocations to
create deeply affordable housing for residents experiencing or at risk of
homelessness. The new units would be permanent supportive housing and/or
transitional housing for tenants with 40% area median incomes or less.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, December 6, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
G.CONSENT:
1. Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.6) for Fiscal Year 2022-23
The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 6)
for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
2. Board Appointment: Arts Council – Kate Jarman Gates
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Kate Jarman Gates to the
Arts Council for a term ending December 13, 2025.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
3. Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Ben Trueman
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Ben Trueman to the
Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending December 13, 2025.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
4. Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Laura Lewis
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Laura Lewis to the
Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending December 13, 2025.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
5. Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Maxwell McLeod
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Maxwell McLeod to the
Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending December 13, 2025.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
6. Board Appointment: Historic Landmark Commission – Emoli Kearns
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Emoli Kearns to the
Historic Landmark Commission for a term ending December 13, 2026.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
7. Board Reappointment Recommendation: Bicycle Advisory Committee
– Martin Cuma
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Martin Cuma to the
Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending December 13, 2025.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
8. Board Reappointment Recommendation: Board of Appeals and
Examiners – Beverly A. Langue
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Beverly A. Langue to
the Board of Appeals and Examiners for a term ending December 28, 2026.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
H.ADJOURNMENT:
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 8, 2022, the undersigned, duly appointed City
Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public
Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided
to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any
others who have indicated interest.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but
not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations
of options discussed.
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for
reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary
aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay
service 711.
PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, October 5, 2021 in an
Electronic Meeting, pursuant to the Chair’s determination.
The following Council Members were present:
Darin Mano, Dennis Faris, Amy Fowler, Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan
Present Legislative leadership:
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director; Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director; Lehua
Weaver, Associate Deputy Director
Present Administrative leadership:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall; Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer
Present City Staff:
Katie Lewis – City Attorney, Brian Fullmer – Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst, Nick Tarbet –
Senior Public Policy Analyst, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Andrew Johnston –
Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes and Records Clerk,
Blake Thomas – Community & Neighborhoods Director, Mary Beth Thompson – Chief Financial
Officer, Kelsey Lindquist – Senior Planner, Jonathan Larsen – Transportation Division Director,
Taylor Hill – City Council Staff, Nick Norris – Planning Director, Nole Walkingshaw – Chief
Innovation Officer, Lara Handwerker – Transportation Planner II
Council Member Amy Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 2:02 p.m.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
1
Work Session Items
1.Nomination of Vice Chair for Calendar Year 2021 ~ 2:00 p.m.
15 min.
The Council will take a straw poll to nominate the Council Vice Chair for the remainder of
the calendar year 2021. The process includes expressions of interest from Council
Members, nominations for the position, and then voting for the Vice Chair position.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Minutes:
Council Member Fowler welcomed everyone to the meeting and announced a new Vice
Chair needed to be elected due to the resignation of Council Member Rogers.
Council Member Wharton self-nominated for the position of Vice Chair. Council
Members Dugan and Faris spoke in support of the nomination. Due to the unanimous
support a straw poll was not held.
2.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 2:15 p.m.
30 min.
The Council will receive an update from the Administration on major items or projects,
including but not limited to:
•COVID-19, the March 2020 Earthquake, and the September 2020 Windstorm;
•Updates on relieving the condition of people experiencing homelessness;
•Police Department work, projects, and staffing, etc.; and
•Other projects or updates.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Recurring Briefing
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Minutes:
Mayor Mendenhall provided COVID-19and Homeless updates regarding:
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
2
•Current metrics 1,264 cases statewide, up 134 from the previous week
•7-day average was 1,395 cases per day
•Statewide child metrics - 267 school-aged child cases (21% of total state cases)
•Six children under 14 hospitalized overnight, 21 for the week
•Vaccination rates (63.73% fully vaccinated Citywide)
•Vaccination locations and times through October.
•Homelessness update regarding the petition to review City Code 21A which
prohibits any new permanent shelters in the City.
Andrew Johnston provided the homelessness update regarding:
•Shelter capacity for September 13, 2021 to October 3, 2021
•Resource Fair held September 23 at Madison Park
•Cleaning and Abatements scheduled for the month
•Trauma, substance use and how it effects the decision of the homeless to accept
services
3.Informational: Updates on Racial Equity and Policing ~ 2:45 p.m.
15 min.
The Council will hold a discussion about recent efforts on various projects City staff are
working on related to racial equity and policing in the City. The conversation may include
issues of community concern about race, equity, and justice in relation to law
enforcement policies, procedures, budget, and ordinances. Discussion may include:
•An update or report on the Commission on Racial Equity in Policing; and
•Other project updates or discussion.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Recurring Briefing
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Minutes:
Allison Rowland announced the City was currently looking to fill the position for the
ADA Coordinator, provided updates from the Racial Equity in Policing (REP)
Commission - elected a new chair (Nicole Salazar-Hall) and vice chair (Tanya Hopkins),
reviewed agenda information and meeting schedule for the Commission.
4.Ordinance: University Ivory House Zoning Map
Amendment ~ 3:00 p.m.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
3
20 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning map
pertaining to a portion of property at 1780 East South Campus Drive from I
(Institutional) District to R-MU (Residential/Mixed Use) District. The property currently
contains an institute building for the LDS Church near the University of Utah Campus.
The zoning map amendment is requested to accommodate a student housing
development. The specific design includes a multi-building development with
approximately 536 student housing units. Consideration may be given to rezoning the
property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, November 9, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 16, 2021
Minutes:
Brian Fullmer gave a brief introduction to the proposal.
Kelsey Lindquist presented the zoning map amendment, reviewed the differences
between the existing zoning and mixed-use residential; stated the Planning Commission
had forwarded a positive recommendation for the proposal.
Council Members and Ms. Lindquist clarified why the City had jurisdiction over this
parcel of property in the University of Utah campus due to the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter Day Saints owning the property and discussed setback requirements.
Scott Bates and Ashley Hadfield (applicants) provided a presentation including: core
mission statement, critical housing needs in the City, scholarship for housing from a
donation cycle, site overview, and floor plans.
5.Informational: Livable Streets Program Recommendations ~ 3:20 p.m.
60 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about the Livable Streets Program recommendations.
The program aims to implement neighborhood traffic calming on a Citywide scale. The
program would use a data-driven, transparent, and equitable prioritization process to
implement traffic calming improvements where there is most need. The Livable Streets
Program has identified over 400 miles of candidate streets on which traffic calming
treatments could be implemented through the program. An annual budget of $700,000
to $1,000,000, along with three new FTEs, would be sufficient for the program, and a
larger amount would enable quicker implementation.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
4
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Minutes:
Allison Rowland gave and overview of the proposal.
Jon Larsen introduced the presentation.
Lara Handwerker presented on livable streets including:
•What constituted a livable street
•Traffic calming options
•Program goals
•Zones and zone prioritization
•Public engagement for the program
•Survey regarding priorities of the residents
•Programing implementation
Council Members, Allison Rowland, Jon Larsen and Laura Handwerker clarified the use
of Funding Our Future (FOF) dollars, zoning, proactive measures, a short-term solution,
and timeframe of the project.
Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jon Larsen, Blake Thomas and Lara
Handwerker provided information to the Council concerning funding, department
collaboration and the project timeframe.
Council Members suggested a formal budget request for the program in the next fiscal
year.
Council Members, Cindy Gust-Jenson and Jon Larsen discussed traffic calming ideas,
alternate funding ideas; the main focus was to make the streets more livable, plans to
develop safer streets, staffing issues that affected street design, collaborating with
engineering on projects and resurfacing was a good alternative for savings and traffic
calming and street transformation.
Council Members were in favor a budget request, next year, for the program and annually
funding a team to focus on projects using Funding our Future dollars.
6.Tentative Break ~ 4:20 p.m.
20 min.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
5
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
7.Informational: Enterprise Resource Planning Project
Update ~ 4:40 p.m.
30 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
Project. The City has chosen Workday as its Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
software vendor. Workday is a global leader in ERP technology and is used to manage the
people, assets, and money of local governments all across the country. Workday will
replace most of the City’s financial and human capital management systems, including
OneSolution, iCIMS, Kronos, CAMP, and more. The new ERP will become the City’s
primary software for finance, human resources, and payroll. Specifically, Workday
services will include core financials, expenses, procurement, grants management,
financial planning, human capital management, recruiting, time tracking, talent &
performance management, learning, payroll, project management and analytics.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Minutes:
Jennifer Bruno provided a brief introduction to the Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP) project.
Lisa Shaffer explained the three main topics under ERP are people, assets and money.
Nole Walkingshaw presented on ERP Workday update including: future ERP
technology and what ERP’s are; project purpose, description, objectives and the Salt Lake
team; Workday software, creating a uniform consistency; project strategy in a phased
approach, best practices, implementation stages, and project constraints.
Council Member Valdemoros asked what changes the Council can expect to see from the
update.
Nole Walkingshaw and Jennifer Bruno shared the designs of increased data organization,
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
6
transparency and collaboration on human resource interactions.
Lisa Shaffer said Council Members would have access to costs of specific items within a
budget and the access would provide citizens and Council Members with more
transparency.
Council Members Mano and Dugan expressed support for the project moving forward.
Mayor Mendenhall expressed gratitude for the work involved and excitement for the
project.
8.Ordinance: Technology Related Land Use Text Amendments ~ 5:10 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend various sections of
the Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to tech related land uses. This
proposal was initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to promote the development of the
technology related industry in the City. The proposal updates the zoning code and does
the following:
•Adds Biomedical, Technology Facility, and Data Center as defined terms in the
zoning code and adds the uses to the land use tables as permitted uses in specific
zoning districts identified in the draft ordinance.
•Adds a qualifying provision as a footnote to the land use tables related to
Biomedical uses that would prohibit uses that produce hazardous waste from being
located within ½ mile of a residential use.
•Modifies and merges several defined land uses into one use called “Laboratory,
related” and updates the land use tables as indicated in the draft ordinance.
•Updates the defined land use “research and development facility” so the definition
reflects the nature of the use and expands where the use is allowed in the land use
tables of the zoning code.
The proposal impacts zoning districts citywide and impacts multiple sections of Title 21A
Zoning. Related provisions of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, November 9, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 16, 2021
Minutes:
Nick Tarbet presented a brief introduction to the proposed amendment.
Nick Norris presented information on the proposed amendment including:
•Creation of new land use definitions
•Modification of existing land use definitions and updates to land use tables
•Biomedical facilities and which zones the facilities would be allowed in
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
7
•Technology facilities and which zones the facilities would be allowed in
•Zoning locations for data centers, medical related labs, research and development
facilities
Council Member Wharton asked for better explanations regarding the necessity of the
categories and definition and expressed concern with the risk associated with broad
definitions.
Nick Norris explained that the City Code did not define the uses presented if passed, the
ordinance would provide a better system with definitions that would help the City
recognize the defined uses.
9.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.3 for Fiscal Year 2021-
22 ~ 5:30 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would amend the final budget
of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2021-22.
Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s
budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications, among other items.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 19, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD
Minutes:
Mary Beth Thompson provided a brief explanation to budget amendment concerning
allocations for Switchpoint.
Council Member Valdemoros asked a clarifying question regarding who qualified for the
Switchpoint services, what type of facility it was, what the mitigation plan was or if one
was required.
Andrew Johnston explained facility type, mitigation plan and the efforts of affordable
housing.
Straw Poll
Support for Budget Amendment No. 3. Council Members Fowler, Faris, Dugan, Wharton
and Mano were in favor, Council Member Valdemoros was opposed.
Board Appointment: Historic Landmark Commission –~ 5:50 p.m.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
8
10. Michael Abrahamson
5 min.
The Council will interview Michael Abrahamson prior to considering their appointment
to the Historic Landmark Commission for a term ending October 5, 2025.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Minutes:
Interview held. Council Member Fowler said Michael Abrahamson’s name was on the
Consent Agenda for formal consideration.
11.Board Appointment: Planning Commission – Andra Ghent ~ 5:55 p.m.
5 min.
The Council will interview Andra Ghent prior to considering their appointment to the
Planning Commission for a term ending October 5, 2025.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Minutes:
Interview held. Council Member Fowler said Andra Ghent’s name was on the Consent
Agenda for formal consideration.
12.Board Appointment: Planning Commission – Aimee
Burrows TENTATIVE
5 min.
The Council will interview Aimee Burrows prior to considering appointment to the
Planning Commission for a term ending October 5, 2025.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
9
Briefing - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Minutes:
Interview held. Council Member Fowler said Aimee Burrows’s name was on the Consent
Agenda for formal consideration.
13.Resolution: Utah Inland Port Authority Board TENTATIVE
The Council will discuss a new appointment to the Utah Inland Port Authority Board.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Minutes:
Council Member Mano nominated Council Member Faris.
Council Member Faris explained the board is important to the constituents that are
mostly impacted.
Standing Items
14.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair
Report of Chair and Vice Chair.
Minutes:
No discussion held
15.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director
Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and
announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
10
City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items.
Minutes:
No announcements
16.Closed Session
The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described
under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to:
a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental
health of an individual;
b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;
c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property,
including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the
transaction would:
(i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water
right or water shares, if:
(i) public discussion of the transaction would:
(A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
(ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be
offered for sale; and
(iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body
approves the sale;
f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and
g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to
Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent
requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Mano to enter into
Closed Session for the purpose of receiving advice of Counsel and pending,
reasonably imminent litigation.
AYE: Darin Mano, Dennis Faris, Amy Fowler, Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel
Dugan
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
Minutes:
Closed session started at 6:08 pm.
Council Members in attendance: Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Dennis Faris, Dan
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
11
Dugan, Darin Mano and Amy Fowler
City Staff in attendance: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Andrew
Johnston, Michelle Hoon, Katie Lewis, Paul Nielson, Hannah Vickery, Cindy Gust-
Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Lehua Weaver, Ben Luedtke, Allison Rowland, Dan Weist, Nick
Tarbet, Tracey Fletcher, Sam Owen, Russell Weeks, Hassan Abdi, Nick Norris, Blake
Thomas, Taylor Hill, and Cindy Lou Trishman.
Closed session ended at: 7:05 pm
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Valdemoros to exit
Closed Session and adjourn.
AYE: Darin Mano, Dennis Faris, Amy Fowler, Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel
Dugan
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
Meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m.
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
City Council Chair
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;
please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b).
To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials, please visit Salt Lake City
Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes
hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library, use the links on the right of your screen
within the ‘Document Relationships’ information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
12
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council
Work Session meeting held Tuesday, October 5, 2021.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
13
PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on Tuesday, May 11, 2021 in an
Electronic Meeting, pursuant to Chair's determination and Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation No. 3 of 2020.
The following Council Members were present:
Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano
The following Council Members were absent:
Ana Valdemoros, James Rogers
Present Legislative leadership:
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director; Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director
Present Administrative leadership:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall; Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Present City Staff:
Katie Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Deputy
City Recorder, Robert Nutzman – Administrative Assistant
Council Member Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at: 7:00 pm
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, May 11, 2021
1
A.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.
Council Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meeting.
Minutes:
Council Member Fowler welcomed everyone and reviewed the purpose of the
meeting.
B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
D.COMMENTS:
E.NEW BUSINESS:
1. TENTATIVE – Ordinance: Electronic Meetings
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would repeal Chapter 2.86
and amend Section 2.06.030.E of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to electronic
meetings of the City’s public bodies.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, May 11, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 11, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Council Members Wharton and Fowler spoke in support of the amendments but
looked forward to meeting in person soon.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt
Ordinance 20 of 2021 repealing Chapter 2.86 and amending Section
2.06.030.E of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to electronic meetings
of the City’s public bodies.
AYE: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, May 11, 2021
2
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros, James Rogers
Final Result: 4 – 0 Pass
F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
G.CONSENT:
H.ADJOURNMENT:
Meeting adjourned at: 7:20 pm
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
City Council Chair
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;
please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b).
To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials, please visit Salt Lake City
Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes
hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library, use the links on the right of your screen
within the ‘Document Relationships’ information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials.
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council
Formal meeting held Tuesday, May 11, 2021.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, May 11, 2021
3
PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED
The Local Building Authority and City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on
Tuesday, August 17, 2021 in an Electronic Meeting, pursuant to the Chair’s determination.
The following Council Members were present:
Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Ana Valdemoros, Chris
Wharton
Present Legislative leadership:
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director; Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director; Lehua
Weaver, Associate Deputy Director
Present Administrative leadership:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall; Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer
Present City Staff:
Katie Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Deputy
City Recorder, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Brian Fullmer – Constituent Liaison,
Policy Analyst, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Senior Public Policy Analyst,
Thais Stewart – Minutes and Records Clerk, Taylor Hill – Council Staff
Council Member Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 6:01 pm
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
1
A.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.
Council/Board Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meetings.
Minutes:
Council Member Fowler welcomed attendees to the meeting.
2.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Minutes:
Moment of silence was held while the Pledge of Allegiance was displayed on the screen.
3.
Welcome and Public Meeting Rules.
Minutes:
Council Member Fowler explained the rules of decorum.
Jennifer Bruno clarified public comments would not be taken during the Local
Building Authority meeting.
B.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1 Resolution: Local Building Authority Lease Revenue Bonds Series
2013A and 2014A
The Board will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the
redemption of certain outstanding lease revenue bonds; authorizing the execution
and delivery of certain related documents and providing for related matters. (Note:
the Local Building Authority is set up for budget matters relating to the
construction of the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries.)
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 13, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
adopt Resolution 4 of 2021 authorizing the redemption of Lease Revenue
Bonds Series 2013A and 2014A and related matters.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Chris
Wharton
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
2
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
C ADJOURNMENT:
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
adjourn as the Local Building Authority and reconvene as the City Council.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
3
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet
determined.
D.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.
The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of Tuesday, November
10, 2020 and meeting minute excerpts relating to the Airport Bond Resolution
actions from Tuesday, June 1, 2021 and Tuesday, July 13, 2021.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
approve Work Session meeting minutes of Tuesday, November 10, 2020, and
meeting minute excerpts relating to the Airport Bond Resolution actions
from Tuesday, June 1, 2021, and Tuesday, July 13, 2021.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Chris
Wharton
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
E.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Ordinance: Rezone at 329-331 South 600 East (Encircle)
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would rezone the property at 329-331 South 600 East from RMF-35 (Moderate
Density Multi-family Residential District) to R-MU-35 (Residential/Mixed Use
District). The proposed rezone to R-MU would allow for a café eatery within the
existing building, which is not currently permitted under the existing RMF-35
zoning designation. This property houses the offices of Encircle Family and Youth
Services Center a nonprofit working with LGBTQ+ people and their friends and
families. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning
district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-00268
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 20, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 6 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 24, 2021
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
4
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Nick Tarbet provided a short introduction to the proposed rezone ordinance.
Shaylee Syme expressed excitement for the project and its benefits to the community.
Jacob Dunford gave a brief history of the Encircle, its LGBTQ friendly area, thanked
the City Council for the support of the project and expressed excitement for the growth
and services the project would provide to the community.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Wharton to
close the Public Hearing and adopt Ordinance 45 of 2021, a rezone of the
property at approximately 329-331 South and 600 East (Encircle) from RMF-
35 to R-MU-35.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Ana
Valdemoros, Chris Wharton
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
2. Ordinance: Goshen Street Alley Vacation
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would close and vacate a portion of a City-owned alley at approximately 740
South Goshen Street between Goshen Street and approximately 1075 West as a
public right-of-way. The applicant owns the adjacent lot north of the alley and
would like to incorporate the alleyway with that lot. Petition No.: 400-06-05
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 13, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 13, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 6 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 24, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
5
Minutes:
Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the proposed ordinance.
Tair Kiphibane spoke in support of the alley vacation.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
close the Public Hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Ana
Valdemoros, Chris Wharton
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
3. Ordinance: Rosewood Park Street and Alley Vacation at 1400 North
1200 West
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would vacate five unimproved City-owned alleys and six unimproved City-owned
streets, situated within Rosewood Park located at approximately 1400 North 1200
West. The proposal would allow for the consolidation of property to simplify the
permitting process for future improvement projects. Petition No.: PLNPCM2019-
01036 and PLNPCM2019-01037
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 20, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 6 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 24, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the proposed ordinance.
No public comments
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Wharton
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
6
to close the Public Hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Ana
Valdemoros, Chris Wharton
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
4. Ordinance: Administrative Decision Appeals Text Amendment
The Council will accept public comment an consider adopting an ordinance that
would amend the zoning ordinance pertaining to appeals of administrative
decisions. Administrative decisions are those made by the Planning Commission,
Historic Landmark Commission, or the Zoning Administrator in the
administration of the zoning ordinance. The amendments primarily clarify what
matters can be decided by the City's Appeals Hearing Officer, who can appeal
decisions, and when an appeal can stay a decision, modify City Code to align with
State law, related case law, and make other clarifications to the appeals chapter of
the zoning ordinance, including:
•Clarify that the City Appeals Hearing Officer can only make decisions
regarding the interpretation and application of provisions of Salt Lake City
Code, not provisions regarding the interpretation and application of
provisions of the Utah State Code, the Utah Constitution, Utah common law
or federal law.
•Modify the list of allowed appellants to the land use applicant, City board or
officer, or “an adversely affected party” to comply with new State Code.
•Eliminate automatic stays of decisions. An appellant would have to
specifically request and justify a “stay” (a hold on further proceedings on a
matter) when appealing an administrative decision.
The proposed amendments affect Chapter 21A.16 of the zoning ordinance.
Related provisions of Title 21A-Zoning may be amended as part of this petition.
Petition No.: PLNPCM2020-00352
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 20, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 6 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 24, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
7
Minutes:
Nick Tarbet provided a brief introduction to the proposed ordinance.
No public comments.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
close the Public Hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Ana
Valdemoros, Chris Wharton
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
5. Ordinance: Text Amendment Eliminating the Special Exception
Process from the Zoning Ordinance
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would delete and eliminate the special exception process from the zoning
ordinance. A special exception is a minor alteration of a dimensional requirement
of the zoning ordinance or addresses accessory uses and structures. The purpose
of this proposal is to amend the zoning ordinance related to special exceptions to
accomplish the following:
•Simplify the zoning ordinance by updating regulations and eliminating
special exceptions;
•Reallocate staff resources away from processing land use applications that
favor individual properties and towards updating zoning codes to align with
adopted master plans;
•Increase predictability and reduce neighbor conflicts that are created by
requests for exceptions to the zoning regulations;
There are more than forty special exceptions authorized in the zoning ordinance.
The proposal addresses each special exception and results in each special
exception being deleted, permitted, or authorized through a different process in
the zoning ordinance. Some special exceptions that will become permitted include
changes to standards to add flexibility and reduce impacts. Special exceptions are
approved by staff of the Planning Division, the Planning Commission, or Historic
Landmark Commission. Related provisions of Title 21A-Zoning and Title 14 may
be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2020-00606
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 20, 2021
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
8
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 6 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 24, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Nick Tarbet provided a brief introduction to the proposed ordinance.
David Davis commented on the impact to the property value in the area and potential
adverse impacts which would require continued monitoring.
Adam Spikell commented on the current impacts and directed Council to read
the email he submitted.
Melissa Reagan commented on Verizon Wireless support for the proposed ordinance
and asked for clarification on ground mounted utility boxes for service providers.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Rogers to
close the Public Hearing, ask the Planning Staff to return with a few
potential recommendations that may mitigate the impact of outdoor dining
on adjacent residential uses and address the red lines from
Verizon Wireless.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Ana
Valdemoros, Chris Wharton
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
6. Resolution: Capital Improvement Program Projects
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for
project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program, which involves
the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other
physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of five or more years and
cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
9
in the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by
September 1 of the same year.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, June 1, 2021; Tuesday, July 13, 2021; Tuesday, July 20, 2021;
and Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 8, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m. and
Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 6 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 24, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Ben Luedtke provided a brief introduction to the proposed resolution.
Beka Huber, Sean Whaley, Allison Dieterie, Ashley Patterson, Amy Wylie
and Nicole Farley spoke in favor of the community garden and the community
engagement it would create.
Jan Crable commented on how dangerous the traffic was on Capitol Hill and asked the
Council to fund projects to reduce to traffic in the area.
Mirko Radosevic and Bruce Wood spoke to the importance of the tennis center in
the community and asked Council to support the funds to assist with
associated projects.
David Troester commented on the three creeks projects and asked for the Council’s
approval, also asked the Council to approve the roadway and trail at the same time to
save the City money.
George Chapman commented on the the projects listed for CIP funding and how the
system needed to be updated.
David Scheer spoke in support for traffic projects on Capitol Hill.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
close the Public Hearing.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Ana
Valdemoros, Chris Wharton
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
10
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
F.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
G.COMMENTS:
1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
Minutes:
Council Member Fowler asked the Mayor questions concerning COVID-19 and
school opening updates.
Mayor Mendenhall stated that a mask order was pending and conversations
with School Board Members continued.
2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled
for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited
to two minutes.)
Minutes:
Katie Pappas commented on climate change crisis and how it affect the air
quality in Salt Lake City.
William Fisher and Johnny Vasic commented on the Inland Port, asked the
Council and Mayor to not support the Port; presenting question to how the City
could hold the developer and businesses accountable for environmental impact.
Jenny Hewson and Samantha Finch spoke in favor of Kristin Riker as
Director of the Public Lands Department.
George Chapman commented on how environmental Salt Lake City
was and improvements that could be made such as no idle zones for semi-trucks.
H.NEW BUSINESS:
1. Advice and Consent: Kristin Riker – Director of the Public Lands
Department
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
11
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Kristin Riker as the
Director of the Public Lands Department.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider
motions.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
approve the appointment of Kristin Riker as the Director of the Public Lands
Department.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Ana
Valdemoros, Chris Wharton
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
2. Motion: Meeting Remotely Without an Anchor Location
The Council will consider a motion to ratify the Chair’s determination to continue
meeting remotely and without an anchor location due to the health and safety of
the people who may be in attendance, and considering the continued closure of
the City and County Building to the public.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider
motions.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Mano to
ratify the Chair’s determination to continue meeting remotely and without
an anchor location.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
12
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Ana
Valdemoros, Chris Wharton
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
13
I.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1. Resolution: Funding Our Future: Addenda to Transit Master Plan
Implementation Interlocal Agreement with Utah Transit Authority
(UTA)
The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the Mayor to
enter into two proposed agreements (the fourth and fifth addenda to date) for the
City’s interlocal agreement (ILA) with UTA. The fourth addendum continues
service on East-West connecting Routes 2 (200 South), 9 (900 South) and 21
(2100 South). The fifth addendum initiates mobilization on Route 1 (1000 North)
which allows UTA to gather the resources needed, such as additional vehicles, to
launch the new service. The ILA is a twenty-year agreement with a goal of full
implementation of the Frequent Transit Network as described in the City’s Transit
Master Plan.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 20, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Wharton to
adopt Resolution 29 of 2021, entering into Addendum Number 4, and
Addendum Number 5 to the Interlocal Agreement with the Utah Transit
Authority and the remaining $175,261 be placed into a holding account
reserved for future Funding Our Future transit expenses.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Ana
Valdemoros, Chris Wharton
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
2. Resolution: Authorizing the Issuance and the Sale of Sales and Excise
Tax Revenue and Refunding Bonds
The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize up to
$26,100,000 of sales and excise tax revenue refunding bonds, in one or more
series and on a taxable or tax-exempt basis, to finance the acquisition of certain
library facilities by refinancing certain lease revenue bonds and to refund certain
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
14
outstanding sales and excise tax revenue bonds; delegating authority to certain
officials and officers to approve the final terms of such bonds; authorizing the
holding of a public hearing and providing for related matters.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 13, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
adopt Resolution 26 of 2021, Authorizing up to $26,100,000 of sales and
excise tax revenue and refunding bonds and providing for related matters.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Ana
Valdemoros, Chris Wharton
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
15
J.CONSENT:
1. Ordinance: Amending City Code Pertaining to Fence, Wall, and Hedge
Height Requirements
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept
public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the
zoning ordinance regulations to remove the Special Exception process that allows
for over-height fences (Chapter 21A.52.030) and to define instances where a taller
fence may be appropriate and approved by right (Chapter 21A.40.120). The
proposed amendments would limit fence, wall, and hedge height to four feet (4’)
in front yards and six feet (6’) in the side or rear yards for all zoning districts,
except for a few specific instances. Those instances include when a residential
district abuts a nonresidential district, manufacturing and extractive industries
zoning districts, public facilities and recreation facilities where a greater height is
necessary to protect public safety, private game courts, and construction fencing.
Additionally, the Planning Commission and the Historic Landmark Commission
would have the authority to grant additional fence, wall, or hedge height as part of
a land use application. The amendments proposed to Chapter 21A.40 will affect all
zoning districts throughout the City. Petition No.: PLNPCM2020-00511
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 21, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
2. Ordinance: Rezone at Nielsen Estates at 833 West Hoyt Place and 834
West 200 North
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept
public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the
zoning map pertaining to two parcels located at 833 West Hoyt Place and 834
West 200 North. The proposal would rezone the parcels from R-1/5,000 (Single-
Family Residential District) and R-1/7,000 (Single- Family Residential District),
respectively, to SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential District). The
applicant would like to rezone the properties for a future Planned Development
that would include the preservation of the existing home and add six new single-
family attached homes with access coming either from Hoyt Place (private street),
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
16
or 200 North. However, the request is not tied to a specific development proposal
at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another
zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2018-00877
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 21, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
3. Ordinance: Permitting Restaurants in the Public Lands Zoning
District
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept
public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Section
21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code to allow restaurant uses in the Public
Lands District. The purpose of the Public Lands zone (section 21A.32.070) is to
delineate areas of public use and control the potential redevelopment of public
uses, lands, and facilities. If amended, restaurants would adhere to the same
regulations as other permitted uses in the zone, which requires permitted and
conditional uses to be located on lots with a minimum lot area of 20,000 square
feet and a minimum lot width of 75 feet. Petition No.: PLNPCM2020-00503
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 21, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
4. Informational: Honorary Street Name “Pastor France Davis Way”
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept
public comment and consider adopting a resolution that would add the honorary
street name “Pastor France Davis Way” on the block of Harvard Avenue between
State Street and Main Street, south of Calvary Baptist Church. This honorary
street name would recognize Reverend France A. Davis, who served as the Pastor
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
17
of Calvary Missionary Baptist Church, a predominately African American
congregation, for over forty years. Reverend Davis was and still is actively
involved in community affairs, serving on numerous state and local boards,
providing counsel to community leaders, and serving as a bridge builder to the
various entities that make up the community. He is one of the Core Commission
Members of the City’s Commission on Racial Equity in Policing.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 24, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
5. Resolution: Authorizing the Issuance and the Sale of Sales and Excise
Tax Revenue and Refunding Bonds
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept
public comment about the issuance of the City’s sales and excise tax revenue
bonds to finance the acquisition of certain library facilities from the Local
Building Authority of Salt Lake City and the potential economic impact that such
library facilities will have on the private sector.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 13, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
6. Board Appointment: Business Advisory Board – Scott Lyttle
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Scott Lyttle to the
Business Advisory Board for a term ending December 29, 2025.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
18
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
7. Board Appointment: Housing Authority of Salt Lake City – Mike Pazzi
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Mike Pazzi to the
Housing Authority of Salt Lake City for a term ending August 17, 2025.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
8. Board Reappointment: Citizens’ Compensation Advisory Committee
(CCAC) - Jeff Worthington
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Jeff Worthington to
the Citizens’ Compensation Advisory Committee for a term extending through
August 17, 2025. This is a Council-appointed position, therefore an
Administrative Recommendation letter is not included.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
9. Board Reappointment: Citizens’ Compensation Advisory Committee
(CCAC) – Brandon Dew
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of of Brandon Dew to the
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
19
Citizens’ Compensation Advisory Committee for a term extending through August
17, 2025. This is a Council-appointed position, therefore an Administrative
Recommendation letter is not included.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Wharton to
adopt the consent agenda.
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Amy Fowler, Ana Valdemoros,
Chris Wharton
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
K.ADJOURNMENT:
Meeting adjourned at 7:31 pm
Local Building Authority Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
Local Building Authority Chair
City Council Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
City Council Chair
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
20
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;
please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b).
To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials, please visit Salt Lake City
Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes
hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library, use the links on the right of your screen
within the ‘Document Relationships’ information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials.
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the Local Building
Authority and City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday, August 17, 2021.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
21
PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on Tuesday, October 12, 2021.
The following Council Members were present:
Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Amy Fowler, Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton
Present Legislative leadership:
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director; Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director; Lehua
Weaver, Associate Deputy Director
Present Administrative leadership:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall; Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer
Present City Staff:
Katie Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes
and Records Clerk
Council Member Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 12, 2021
1
A.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.
Council Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meeting.
Minutes:
Council Member Fowler welcomed attendees and detailed the remote meeting
format.
B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
NONE.
C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
NONE.
D.COMMENTS:
NONE.
E.NEW BUSINESS:
1. Resolution: Local Emergency Declaration Extension (COVID)
The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would extend the Mayor’s
August 20 proclamation that declared a local emergency related to COVID-19,
rising cases, and resurgence of the Delta variant. If extended, the related
emergency order for masks in K-12 schools, would also be extended.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, September 14, 2021 and Tuesday, October 12, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 12, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider
motions.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Valdemoros
to adopt Resolution 39 of 2021, extending the declaration of local emergency
through December 20, 2021.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 12, 2021
2
AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Amy Fowler, Ana Valdemoros, Chris
Wharton
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
NONE.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 12, 2021
3
G.CONSENT:
NONE.
H.ADJOURNMENT:
Meeting adjourned at 7:30 pm
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
City Council Chair
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;
please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b).
To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials, please visit Salt Lake City
Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes
hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library, use the links on the right of your screen
within the ‘Document Relationships’ information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials.
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council
Formal meeting held Tuesday, October 12, 2021.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 12, 2021
4
PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on Thursday, November 10,
2022.
The following Council Members were present:
Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Victoria Petro-Eschler, Alejandro Puy
The following Council Members were absent:
Ana Valdemoros
Present Legislative leadership:
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director; Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director; Lehua
Weaver, Associate Deputy Director
Present Administrative leadership:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall; Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer
Present City Staff:
Brian Fullmer – Public Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst, Cindy Lou
Trishman – City Recorder, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Isaac Canedo – Public
Engagement Communication Specialist, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Nick
Tarbet – Public Policy Analyst, Matthew Brown – Minutes & Records Clerk
Council Member Mano presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 PM
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
1
A.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.
Council Member Darin Mano will conduct the formal meeting.
Minutes:
Council Member Mano welcomed everyone to the meeting.
2.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Minutes:
Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
3.
Welcome and Public Meeting Rules.
Minutes:
Council Member Mano explained the rules of decorum.
4.
The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of June 3, 2021; June
8, 2021; June 10, 2021; June 21, 2021; July 12, 2022; July 19, 2022; September 6,
2022; and October 11, 2022 as well as the formal meeting minutes of July 20,
2021; August 29, 2022; September 6, 2022; and October 11, 2022.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to
approve minutes from the work session meetings of June 3, 2021; June 8,
2021; June 10, 2021; June 21, 2021; July 12, 2022; July 19, 2022; September
6, 2022; October 11, 2022 as well as formal meeting minutes of July 20, 2021;
August 29, 2022; September 6, 2022; October 11, 2022.
AYE: Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Victoria Petro-Eschler,
Alejandro Puy
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
5.
The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor
Mendenhall declaring November 20th as Transgender Day of Remembrance in
Salt Lake City.
Minutes:
Council Member Wharton read the resolution.
The resolution was presented to Tanya Hawkins (Co-CEO for the Utah Pride
Center).
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
2
Council Member Wharton acknowledged that since the creation of the resolution,
there were more transgender individuals in the community that have died.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Wharton to
adopt Joint Resolution 38 of 2022 declaring November 20 as Transgender
Day of Remembrance in Salt Lake City.
AYE: Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Victoria Petro-Eschler,
Alejandro Puy
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Ordinance: Rezone at 856 West 1300 South
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would amend the zoning of the property at 856 West 1300 South Street from R-
1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential District) to FB-UN1 (Form Based Urban
Neighborhood District). The parcel is currently occupied by a single-family
residential dwelling. This proposed zoning map amendment change will facilitate
potential redevelopment of this parcel into a single-family attached residential
project. The zoning map amendment does not require an amendment to the
Westside Master Plan. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to
another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-
00009
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 11, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
th
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
3
Minutes:
Brian Fullmer provided an introduction to the ordinance.
No public comment on this item.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Puy to close
the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting.
AYE: Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Victoria Petro-Eschler,
Alejandro Puy
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
2. Resolution: Digital Equipment Donation Program - Benefits Analysis
and Recommendation
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that
would authorize the donation of certain City computers to benefit disadvantaged
communities and low-moderate income families through a Digital Donation
Program. The program would donate 146 surplus computers the City no longer
intends to use to local nonprofits for distribution to community members in need.
Twenty-five of the surplus computers will be allocated to Youth and Family
Service to support individuals being served through their programming.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
4
Minutes:
Sylvia Richards provided an introduction to the resolution.
No public comment on this item.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Fowler to
close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting.
AYE: Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Victoria Petro-Eschler,
Alejandro Puy
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
3. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 675 N F Street –
Capitol Park Cottages – Petitioner: Ivory Development
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would amend the zoning of property at 675 North F Street from FR-3/12,000
(Foothills Residential District) to SR-1 (Special Development Pattern Residential
District). The ordinance would also amend the Avenues Community Master Plan
Future Land Use Map from Very Low Density to Low Density so that the master
plan will correspond with their requested low-density zone. The requests are
intended to accommodate two pending Planned Development and Subdivision
requests from Ivory Development for a 19-lot single-family dwelling development
titled "Capitol Park Cottages." Consideration may be given to rezoning the
property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.:
PLNPC2020-00335/00334
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
5
Minutes:
Nick Tarbet provided an introduction to the ordinance.
Linda Dean, Alan Hayes, Charlie Cannon, Judy Dencker, Paul
Mckinnon, Susie Polychronis, Nat Dean, Larry Perkins, Lon Jenkins,
Dirk Van Klaveren, Sara Delong, Scott Young, Joel Deaton, Bob
Kinney, Cindy Van Klaveren, Don Warmbier, Cheri Daily, Peter
Wright, Jan Mckinnon, Dave Alderman, Sabrina Neilson, Herb Livsey,
Joseph Cook, Courtney Henley, Hilary Jacobs, Sarah Van Voorhis,
Drake Tolliver, John Kennedy, Janie Mathis, and Jason Bresley spoke
in opposition to the ordinance, provided a handout to Council Members regarding
the proposal, and outlined the following as reasons for opposition:
•Rezone would create a 200% increase in the number of lots and a 300%
increase in the number of households
•The petitioner’s plan does not meet minimum yard setbacks which will
overbuild the area relative to the rest of the area
•Built units will not be affordable and the attached dwelling units (ADUs) are
not guaranteed to be rented out
•The development would negatively impact Capitol Park Avenue, which is a
private road that is not equipped for the density of the development
•Proposed plans reduce City-owned land increasing comparative density
•Units are different in size, scale, and setbacks from other homes in the
proposed zoning
•Streets near the development are steep, so the area is not walkable
•Mature trees on the lots will be removed under the proposed development
which causes a variety of environmental problems
Esther Stowell spoke about the disparity between the East and West sides of
the City and encouraged developers to build on the West side.
Nigel Swaby, Maureen Bateman, Nathan Peters, and Peter
Gamvroulas spoke in support of the ordinance and outlined the following as
reasons for support:
•The potential for built ADU’s to provide affordable housing
•Increased sidewalk safety and an added public park
•ADUs in the proposed homes could be beneficial to families
•Compact development is more sustainable than large lot development
Council Member Wharton expressed interest in researching if retaining walls
could be consistent with current City code.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
6
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Petro-
Eschler to close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council
meeting.
AYE: Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Victoria Petro-Eschler,
Alejandro Puy
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
1. Ordinance: Alley Vacation at approximately 925 South 1200 West
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would vacate a portion of City-owned alley situated adjacent to the property at
925 South 1200 West, and a section of the 9-Line trail. The proposal is to vacate
an east/west alley segment and incorporate the vacant land into the neighboring
property. Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-00806
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 11, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 4, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
7
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
adopt Ordinance 72 of 2022 Alley Vacation at approximately 925 South 1200
West.
AYE: Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Victoria Petro-Eschler,
Alejandro Puy
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
2. Ordinance: Stealth Towers Text Amendments
The Council will consider a request that would amend the Salt Lake City Zoning
Ordinance to allow Stealth Wireless Telecommunication Facilities taller than 35
feet (up to 75 feet) in height within the Public Lands (PL) Zoning District. Stealth
facilities are currently limited to 35 feet in height. This request is specifically
related to a proposal by the applicant to construct a stealth cellular tower at the
Pioneer Police Precinct at 1040 West 700 South, but the proposed text
amendment would apply to properties within the PL district citywide potentially
allowing stealth towers at some locations. Petition No.: PLNPCM2020-00284
The Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation, therefore an
ordinance has not been drafted. If the Council votes to approve the zone
amendment, an ordinance would be drafted and considered for approval.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, March 22, 2022 and Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 22, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Council Member Mano noted that their reason for opposition to the ordinance
because of the stealth aspect of the towers.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Petro-Eschler, seconded by Council Member
Dugan to adopt Ordinance 73 of 2022 Stealth Towers Text Amendments.
AYE: Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Victoria Petro-Eschler, Alejandro Puy
NAY: Darin Mano
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
8
Final Result: 5 – 1 Pass
3. Resolution: Salt Lake City International Airport Master Plan
The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting a
resolution that would approve the Salt Lake City Department of Airports’ 2022
Master Plan Update for continued development of the Salt Lake City
International Airport. The 2022 Master Plan evaluates the ability of Airport
facilities to accommodate user needs at existing and forecasted demand levels and
provides recommendations regarding additional facilities that are needed to meet
the forecasted demand.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, August 9, 2022; Tuesday, October 11, 2022; and Thursday,
November 10, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 16, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 6, 2022 and
Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
adopt Resolution 39 0f 2022 Salt Lake City International Airport Master
Plan:
•The master plan will include an amendment as appendix to the
document with the following:
•The Council is adding these priority points to the plan and its ongoing
capital implementation:
•The airport and its partners will focus design and practice on reducing
carbon footprint resulting from all single occupancy vehicle traffic to
the airport, and
•The airport and its partners will focus on strategies to meet the needs
of customers who experience the long walk as a high barrier and even
hardship, including those who don’t qualify normally for accessibility
accommodations.
Legislative intents related to the adoption of the Airport Master Plan
•The Council recommends advancing the first priority through jointly
convening one or more multi-partner transit-focused meetings or
public meeting briefings in collaboration with the Administration and
key departments the Administration identifies; likely the Department
of Community and Neighborhoods. Collaboration is also likely to
include outside partners like Utah Transit Authority, Utah Department
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
9
of Transportation, airlines and airport vendors.
•Topics could include but not be limited to encouraging, facilitating, or
incentivizing enhanced or shared ride access for employees who work
for or at the Salt Lake City International Airport.
•This collaboration effort would identify policy opportunities to address
air quality issues through transit and carbon reduction measures.
AYE: Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Victoria Petro-Eschler,
Alejandro Puy
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
D.COMMENTS:
1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
Minutes:
No questions for the Mayor.
2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled
for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited
to two minutes.)
Minutes:
No public comment.
E.NEW BUSINESS:
NONE.
F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
NONE.
G.CONSENT:
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
10
1. Ordinance: Rezone, Master Plan Amendment and Alley Vacation at
1550 S Main Street Assemblage
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 7 p.m. to accept
public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the
Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map and the zoning of the
properties at 1518, 1530, 1540, 1546 South Main Street and 1515 South Richards
Street from CC (Corridor Commercial District) and R-1/5,000 (Single-Family
Residential District) to FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood District). The
ordinance would also vacate a city-owned alley situated adjacent to properties
located at 1518, 1530, 1540, South Main Street and 1515 South Richards Street.
The intent of these petitions would be to combine all parcels as well as the alley
into one cohesive parcel under the new zoning in order to build a mixed-
use/multi-family development on the site. Consideration may be given to rezoning
the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.:
PLNPCM2021-1191 and PLNPCM2022-00065 and 00086
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 13, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
11
2. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.4 for Fiscal Year 2022-23
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 7 p.m. to accept
public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final
budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal
Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect
adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and
modifications. The proposed amendment includes sales tax revenue bond funds
for critical infrastructure and investments in historic city-owned properties,
additional funding for phase one of creating the Glendale Regional Park, police
officer overtime, renovations to fire stations for gender equity improvements and
emergency rental assistance funds from the U.S. Treasury among other items.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
3. Board Appointment: Business Advisory Board - Siliveinusi Niu
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Siliveinusi Niu to the
Business Advisory Board for a term ending Monday, December 28, 2026.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
12
4. Board Reappointment: Business Advisory Board - Abudujannah
(Abu) Soud
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Abudujannah (Abu)
Soud to the Business Advisory Board for a term ending Monday, December 28,
2026.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
5. Board Reappointment: Transportation Advisory Board – Greg
Sanchez
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Greg Sanchez to the
Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 28, 2026.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
13
6. Confirm Corrected Board Term Date, Board Appointment:
Accessibility and Disability Commission – Kayci Lynam
The Council will consider approving the correct term date for the appointment of
Kayci Lynam to the Accessibility and Disability Commission for a term ending
December 28, 2026.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
7. Confirm Corrected Board Term Date, Board Appointment:
Accessibility and Disability Commission – Rich Foster
The Council will consider approving the correct term date for the appointment of
Rich Foster to the Accessibility and Disability Commission for a term ending
December 28, 2026.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
14
8. Board Reappointment: Airport Board - Arlyn Bradshaw
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Arlyn Bradshaw to the
Airport Board for a term ending November 10, 2026.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Thursday, November 10, 2022
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
15
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Puy to approve
the Consent agenda.
AYE: Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Victoria Petro-Eschler,
Alejandro Puy
ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
H.ADJOURNMENT:
Meeting adjourned at 9:00 PM
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
City Council Chair
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been
discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-
203(2)(b).
To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials, please visit Salt Lake
City Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body
Minutes hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library, use the links on the right of
your screen within the ‘Document Relationships’ information to listen to the audio or view
meeting materials.
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City
Council Formal meeting held Thursday, November 10, 2022.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 10, 2022
16
Items B1-B3
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:December 13, 2022
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-3 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: Dec. 13, 2022
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:December 13, 2022
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSION
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: Dec. 13, 2022
Potential Action: TBD
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted three grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
1.2022 Brownfields Clean Up Program Grant at 22 So. Jeremy Street in the
Redevelopment Agency’s North Temple Project Area
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: Note: The RDA owns this property, and it is located on the
Folsom Trail. If awarded, the grant monies will be used to fund the clean-up of hazardous
materials on the property as follows:
a. $9,000 for RDA staff to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) meetings
b. $22,600 for community engagement to provide information and progress reports for
residents
c. $446,500 for contract costs for site clean-up (Phase I Environmental site assessments
(ESAs) and Phase II ESAs were previously conducted under two EPA Brownfields
assessment grant projects.
Grant Amount: $495,200
Requested by: Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency
Funding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Page | 2
Match Requirement: $ -0-
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards , Linda Sanchez,
Lehua Weaver
Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer
Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Sarah Behrens , Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk
Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com
Department of Police – Grant Acquisition and Management | Jordan Smith
CC: Cara Linds ley
FROM: Sarah Behrens
DATE: November 29, 2022
SUBJECT: Former Schovares Electronics Site
FUNDING AGENCIES: Environmental Protection Agency
GRANT PROGRAM: 2022 Brownfields Clean -up Program
REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $495.200
DEPARTMENT: Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency
COLLABORATING AGENCIES:
DATE SUBMITTED: November 22, 2022
SPECIFICS:
Equipment/Supplies Only
Technical Assistance
Provides Hourly Positions
Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
Match Required In-Kind Services and Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
RDA recently purchased the property at 22 South Jeremy Street which is located within RDA’s North Temple Project Area. The gr ant
will fund the clean-up of hazardous materials resulting from historical use of the property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessments
(ESAs) and Phase II ESAs were conducted on the site under two prior EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant projects.
The performance period of the grant is 4 years. The budget of $495,200 includes Travel ($9,000) for RDA staff to attend EPA
meetings, Community Engagement ($22,600) to provide information and progress reports for residents, and Contractual costs for
site cleanup ($446,500).
Items B1-B3
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:December 13, 2022
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-3 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: Dec. 13, 2022
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:December 13, 2022
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSION
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: Dec. 13, 2022
Potential Action: TBD
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted three grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
2.Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) FY 22
Grant
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: The Transportation Division is a partner in this SMART
FY22 grant application submitted by UTA for improving transit and safety in Utah. The
purpose of the program is to create shorter and more reliable commutes to transit riders,
and increased safety for pedestrians and other users. If UTA is selected for the grant award,
Salt Lake City could receive an estimated $450,000 for transit signal equipment installed at
thirty UTA Route One intersections within city boundaries.
Grant Amount: $450,000
Requested by: Transportation Division of the Department of Community &
Neighborhoods
Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant for Research
and Training, in collaboration with the Utah Transit Authority (applicant) and the Utah
Department of Transportation
Note: According to the Administration, if awarded, Salt Lake City would be chosen as the
Page | 2
location for prototyping transit signal priority using connected vehicle technology and
infrastructure-based Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technologies which will be
installed at thirty intersections along UTA Route One within city boundaries.
Match Requirement: $ - 0 -
Question:
a) Do the intersections include TRAX, Frontrunner, Sugar House Streetcar as well as
Freight Train intersections (all train signals)?
Signals that have rail components use an existing priority and/or preemption that is
a higher level of interaction between the train and the signal system. This does not
rule out using the equipment acquired with SMART grant funding for similar
purposes, but that would be in a future phase of implementation beyond the scope of
the SMART 2022 grant submitted by Utah Transit Authority (UTA). The primary
purpose of the requested SMART 2022 grant funding is planning for a UTA system-
wide approach for priority corridors and intersections. The planning effort would be
informed by a limited prototyping deployment in Salt Lake City along UTA Route 1.
Installation sites for the signal priority equipment would be determined by UTA,
Utah Department of Transportation, and Salt Lake City Transportation Division
based on the prototyping testing parameters.
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez,
Lehua Weaver; Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer; Department of Finance | Mary Beth
Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk; Office of the City Attorney
| Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com; Department of Police – Grant Acquisition and Management |
Jordan Smith
CC: Department of Community and Neighborhoods | Blake Thomas, Orion Goff, Jon Larsen, Julianne Sabula,
Kevin Young
FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg
DATE: November 18, 2022
SUBJECT: Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation Fiscal Year 2022 Grant
FUNDING AGENCIES: U.S. Department of Transportation - Office of the Assistant for Research and Training
GRANT PROGRAM: Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) Fiscal Year 2022 Grant
REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $450,000
DEPARTMENT: Department of Community and Neighborhoods | Division of Transportation
COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Utah Transit Authority (prime applicant) and Utah Department of Transportation
DATE SUBMITTED: November 15, 2022
SPECIFICS:
Equipment/Supplies Only
□ Technical Assistance
□ Provides Hourly Positions
□ Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
□ Match Required In-Kind Services and Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
Salt Lake City Division of Transportation is a partner in the SMART Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 grant application
submitted by Utah Transit Authority (UTA) for Improving Transit Performance and Safety in Utah.
The project aims to deliver shorter and more reliable commutes to transit riders and increase safety for
pedestrians and other vulnerable road users through deployment of advanced technologies.
Salt Lake City would serve as the location for prototyping transit signal priority using connected vehicle
technology and Infrastructure-based Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technologies.
If UTA is selected for a grant award, Salt Lake City could potentially receive an estimated $450,000 for transit
signal priority equipment installed at 30 intersections along UTA Route 1 within the city boundaries.
There is $0 in local non-federal match associated with the SMART FY 2022 grant application.
Items B1-B3
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:December 13, 2022
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-3 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: Dec. 13, 2022
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:December 13, 2022
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSION
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: Dec. 13, 2022
Potential Action: TBD
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted three grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
3.2022 State of Utah ADF (Alcohol and Drug Free Committee) DUI Enforcement
Equipment Grant
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: The Police Department is requesting 14 portable breath
testing (PBT) devices from the State of Utah. If awarded, the State will order the equipment
and ship it to the Department. The Department will not receive funding.
Grant Amount: The estimated value of the equipment is $389 per unit or a total of
$5,446.
Requested by: Police Department
Funding Agency: State of Utah
Match Requirement: $ - 0 -
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Office of the City Counc il | Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust -Jenson, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda
Sanchez, Lehua Weaver
Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer
Office of the City Atto rney | Justin Anderson, Recorder Routing
Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Elizabeth Gerhart,
Sandee Moore, John Vuyk
Department of Police | Mike Brown, Shellie Dietrich
FROM: J ordan Smith
DATE: November 29, 2022
SUBJECT: 2022 State of Utah ADF Committee DUI Enforcement Equipment
FUNDING AGENCY: State of Utah
GRANT PROGRAM: 2022 DUI Enforcement Equipment
REQUESTED AMOUNT: See grant details below
DEPARTMENT APPLYING: Police Depart ment
CO LLABORA TING AGENCIES: N/A
DATE SUBMITTED: November 29, 2022
SPECIFICS:
Equipment/Supplies
Technical Assistance (Training)
Provides FTE Position
Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
Match Required: In-Kind and/or Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
The Salt Lake City Police Department is requesting 14 portable breath testing (PBT) devices. If awarded, the
devices will be ordered by the state ADF Committee and shipped t o the police department. The department
will not receive funding for the devices directly.
Item B4
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY23
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke
Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:December 13, 2022
RE: Library Budget Amendment Number One FY2023
MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT
I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2023
final budget of the Salt Lake City Library only for items as shown on the motion sheet.
Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the individual item being approved below; it is listed
for reference.
Funds to Facilitate Property Acquisition ($1.3 Million from Library Fund Balance)
MOTION 2 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action.
MOTION 3 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date.
Item C1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:December 13, 2022
RE: 1518, 1530, 1540, 1546 South Main Street, 1515 South Richards Street
Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendments, Alley Vacation
PLNPCM2021-01191 and PLNPCM2022-00065/-00086
MOTION 1 (adopt)
I move that the Council adopt the ordinance with a requirement that the petitioner enter a development
agreement with the following conditions as outlined in the ordinance:
•Include a minimum of 1,000 square feet of commercial space with frontage on Main Street
•Include a minimum of 10 two-bedroom dwelling units in the development
•Provide a minimum of ½ onsite parking space per dwelling unit in the development
•Provide onsite bicycle maintenance facilities
•Provide onsite secure storage for a minimum of 15 bicycles
•Housing being removed from the site must be replaced
•Property for the vacated alley must be integrated into the future development
•The rezoned parcels must be consolidated through the appropriate process
•The proposed method of disposition of the alley property shall be consistent with the method of
disposition set forth in Section 14.52.040 (“Method of Disposition”), Chapter 2.58 (“City Owned Real
Property”) of the Salt Lake City Code, and all other applicable laws.
I further move that the Council close petition number PLNPCM2022-00065 amending the Central
Community Master Plan as it is no longer needed because the Ballpark Station Plan was adopted after the
petition was submitted and overrides the Central Community Master Plan.
MOTION 2 (reject)
I move that the Council reject the ordinances.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:December 13, 2022
RE: 1518, 1530, 1540, 1546 South Main Street, 1515 South Richards Street
Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendments, Alley Vacation
PLNPCM2021-01191 and PLNPCM2022-00065/-00086
PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE
Several people spoke at the December 6, 2022 public hearing, most of whom expressed general support for
redeveloping the property. Concerns were expressed about no required setbacks, the proposed project’s
size not fitting the neighborhood fabric, and a loss of green space to allow for trees. Additional concerns
cited include height above what the recently adopted Ballpark Station Area Plan calls for in the Main Street
Area and whether this proposal is in harmony with the Plan. Concerns about potential loss of front yards
for neighbors to socialize with one another, and vacating the alley without a comprehensive plan for alleys
were also noted.
A commenter suggested a development agreement would benefit this project and recommended a public
process for it beginning with the Planning Commission.
The Council closed the public hearing and deferred action to a future Council meeting.
The developer agreed to a development agreement with the following conditions. These are included in the
first motion on the associated motion sheet.
•Include a minimum of 1,000 square feet of commercial space with frontage on Main Street
•Include a minimum of 10 two-bedroom dwelling units
•Include a minimum of ½ onsite parking space per dwelling unit
•Provide onsite bicycle maintenance facilities
•Provide onsite secure storage for a minimum of 15 bicycles
Item Schedule:
Briefing: November 10, 2022
Set Date: November 10, 2022
Public Hearing: December 6, 2022
Potential Action: December 13, 2022
Page | 2
The following information was provided for the December 6, 2022 public hearing. It is
provided again for background purposes.
BRIEFING UPDATE
At the November 10, 2022 briefing, Planning staff updated the Council about how the proposal aligns with
the recently adopted Ballpark Station Area Plan. The subject parcels straddle the Plan’s “Main Street,” and
“Neighborhood” Areas, with the alley as a dividing line. It was noted the Plan calls for buildings in the
“Main Street Area” up to three stories, while the proposal is four stories. The “Neighborhood Area” says
new buildings should be compatible with existing structures. The proposed development would increase
both scale and intensity from what exists.
As shown in the image below, Kensington Avenue is at the northern edge of the subject parcels. In the
Ballpark Station Area Plan, buildings north of Kensington Avenue are recommended to be 3-4 stories,
while south of Kensington, it advises a maximum of three stories. Planning staff explained from an urban
design viewpoint, buildings on corner lots are often taller than mid-block.
Council Members asked about off-street parking, bicycle storage and maintenance facilities, and family-
sized units. The petitioner agreed to a minimum of 0.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit and said the
proposed development will likely include additional parking.
The petitioner stated each of their developments in the FB-UN2 zoning district includes bike rooms with
secure storage and maintenance facilities. Following the briefing, Council staff reached out to the petitioner
for details about larger units and bicycle storage/maintenance facilities. They are planning on a minimum
of 10 two-bedroom units. Design details are not finalized so the mix of studio and one-bedroom units is
unknown at this point.
The petitioner is willing to include a bike maintenance area. They were not planning on a bike storage area
but are amenable to include one provided they have flexibility to scale it based upon resident demand. The
Council may wish to confirm bike storage details the developer is willing to include in a development
agreement.
The following information was provided for the November 10, 2022 Council briefing.
It is provided again for background purposes.
STAFF NOTE
The Ballpark Station Area Plan was adopted by the Council after these petitions were submitted. That plan
overrides the Central Community Master Plan for the area, so the Council will not need to act on petition
PLNPCM2022-00065 to amend the Central Community Master Plan future land use map.
The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the zoning map and master plan for parcels at 1518,
1530, 1540, 1546 South Main Street, and 1515 South Richards Street in City Council District Five, from CC
(Corridor Commercial) and R-1/5,000 (single-family residential) to FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban
Neighborhood). A request to change the Central Community Master Plan future land use map from
Community Commercial to High Mixed-Use is also proposed. In addition, a request to vacate a City-owned
alley that runs through the properties is included in the proposal. (See image below.)
Page | 3
The petitioner’s intent is to consolidate the seven parcels (some parcels share the same address), and the
alley into one larger (approximately 2 acre) parcel with FB-UN2 zoning to develop a mixed-use
development on the site. No specific site development proposal has been submitted as of the writing of this
report.
Two duplexes and two single-family homes would be removed for a total loss of six housing units as part of
the proposal. Replacement of the housing units was the option selected for housing loss mitigation as
discussed in Consideration 4 below.
These proposals were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its July 27, 2022 meeting and a public
hearing was held at which five people spoke. Some comments were supportive of redeveloping the area and
closing the alley. Concerns expressed included the size of the proposed development is out of scale for the
neighborhood and would impact the area, particularly those who live adjacent to the property; changing
the zoning from prevalent existing Corridor Commercial zoning of properties fronting Main Street in the
area; additional rental units will not benefit the already predominately renter occupied neighborhood; and
concern for residents who would be displaced when existing housing is removed.
The Commission closed the hearing and voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the
City Council with the following conditions:
1. Housing removed from the site must be replaced.
2. Vacated alley property be integrated into the future development.
3. Rezoned parcels must be consolidated through the appropriate process.
Page | 4
Area zoning map with subject parcels and alley outlined
Image courtesy Salt Lake City Planning Division
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning and future land use map amendments, determine if
the Council supports moving forward with the proposal.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. The Council may wish to ask if any units in the proposed building will be affordable, and at what
percentage of AMI.
2. The Council may wish to ask if current residents of the properties will be assisted with relocation.
3. The Council may wish to ask the developer for the anticipated mix of rental units in the proposed
development.
Page | 5
4. The petitioner expressed a willingness to provide “ample” off-street parking in the proposed
development. The Council may wish to ask what parking ratios are being considered and if the
petitioner is amenable to including this in a development agreement.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property, amend the future land use map, and
vacate the alley. No formal site plan has been submitted to the City nor is it within the scope of the
Council’s authority to review the plans. Because zoning of a property can outlast the life of a building, any
rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the zoning of that property, not
simply based on a potential project.
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Planning staff identified six key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 3-9 of the
Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the staff
report.
Consideration 1-Compliance with City Goals, Policies and Plans
The Central Community Master Plan (2005) is the current relevant plan for this area. The Plan’s future
land use map shows the properties fronting Main Street, and the motel as “Community Commercial.” The
property fronting Richards Street is listed as “Medium Density Residential.”
Planning staff found the following Central Community Master Plan policies and statements applicable to
this proposal:
•RLU (Residential Land Use)-1.3- Restrict high-density residential growth to Downtown, East
Downtown, TOD areas and Gateway.
•RLU-1.5 - Use residential mixed uses zones to provide residential land uses with supportive retail,
service and commercial uses.
•Mixed Use Policy – RLU-4.0 - Encourage mixed use development that provides residents with a
commercial and institutional component while maintaining the residential character of the
neighborhood.
•Mixed Use Policy – RLU-4.2 – Support small mixed use development on the corners of major
streets that does not have significant adverse impact on the residential neighborhood.
•Commercial land use policy CLU-1.4 – High Density Mixed Use – Target areas adjacent to light rail
station in the downtown area for higher intensity commercial use and medium to high density
housing.
•Ensure that new development is compatible with existing neighborhood in terms of scale,
character, and density.
It is Planning’s opinion that the proposal is supported by some Central Community Master Plan policies
and statements, while others do not.
The Ballpark Station Area Plan is in draft form and has not been adopted. The draft Plan has been
discussed with the community and references to it were included in some comments to Planning. The
subject petitions may meet some elements of the Ballpark Station Area Plan while not meeting others. It is
worth noting since no specific development proposal has been submitted, and the Plan has not been
adopted, it is not possible to determine if the petitions would comply.
Page | 6
Plan Salt Lake (2015) outlines an overall vision of sustainable growth and development in the city.
Included in the Plan is a recommendation to develop a mix of uses needed to accommodate responsible
growth. New development scale and character compatibility with the existing neighborhood is also a
consideration.
Planning staff stated
“The proposed development is supported by general principles and initiatives found in Plan Salt
Lake. It would provide additional housing options within a walkable neighborhood with
commercial services served by convenient transit opportunities.”
It is Planning staff’s opinion the proposal is in line with Growing SLC: A Five-Year Housing Plan – 2018-
2022 (2017), which calls for providing more housing units and housing variety in the neighborhood.
Consideration 2-Neighborhood Compatibility & Anticipated Impacts
Neighborhood compatibility and impacts from new development are important considerations when
reviewing zoning changes. The applicant stated they intend to remove the motel and other structures on
the subject parcels. As noted above, no specific site plan has been submitted and the property could
potentially be developed with other uses allowed under the FB-UN2 zoning designation.
Existing CC zoning would allow buildings up to 30 feet by right, and up to 45 feet through Design Review.
The proposed FB-UN2 zoning would allow buildings up to 50 feet tall if zoning standards are met. It is
worth noting the petitioner originally included a request additional height up to 65 feet on the parcels. That
request was withdrawn following community and staff feedback.
Additional standards including glass percentages, building materials and ground floor uses in the FB-UN2
zoning district are not required in CC zoning. When abutting single-family residential zoning, FB-UN2
zoning requires added upper floor step backs to lessen impact to lower scale adjacent development. CC
zoning does not include this requirement. (These standards are included in the Zoning District Comparison
table found on pages 8-10 below.)
Planning staff found the proposed FB-UN2 zoning designation would not create additional impacts to the
neighborhood beyond existing zoning if the properties were redeveloped.
Consideration 3-Consideration of Alternate Zoning Districts
Planning staff reviewed the R-MU-45 zoning district as a potential alternative to the requested FB-UN2. It
has similar characteristics as FB-UN2 including a maximum height of 45 feet which is why they selected it
for comparison. Development standards for the ground floor and upper floor step backs are also included
under R-MU-45, but not in the current CC zoning district. (See Zoning District Comparison below.)
A key difference between FB-UN2 and R-MU-45 is parking requirements. FB-UN2 does not require off-
street parking. The petitioner stated they intend to provide adequate parking and are amenable to a
development agreement including that requirement.
In its review, Planning found more of the allowed uses in R-MU-45 are conditional rather than permitted,
which would require additional processes when reviewing a development proposal. Other zoning districts
allow both residential and mixed-use developments, with varying height and other requirements.
Planning staff did not recommend consideration of alternate zoning districts.
Page | 7
Consideration 4-Housing Loss Mitigation Requirements
When considering petitions for zoning changes that permit nonresidential land uses on property that
includes residential dwelling units, Salt Lake City Code requires a City approved housing loss mitigation
plan. The subject petition proposes to remove six existing housing units. Additional housing units are
proposed, but a plan is required as FB-UN2 zoning allows nonresidential uses.
Mitigating housing loss may include providing replacement housing or paying a fee to the City’s housing
trust fund based on the difference between the housing value and replacement cost of building new units.
For deteriorated housing, not caused by deliberate indifference by the property owner, a flat fee may be
paid by the petitioner to the City’s housing trust fund.
A plan satisfying the mitigation requirement by providing replacement housing was submitted. This plan
was evaluated and approved by the Community and Neighborhoods Department Director. The Council has
the option to work with the petitioner to include replacement housing units as part of a development
agreement.
Consideration 5-Alley Vacation Request
As discussed above, an alley vacation is part of the petitioner’s proposal. The subject alley is approximately
250 feet long and 16 feet wide. The alley is said to be blocked for most of its length and is being used for
parking and storage.
Alley vacation requests receive three phases of review, as outlined in section 14.52.030 Salt Lake City Code
(see pages 11-13 below). Those phases include an administrative determination of completeness; a public
hearing, including a recommendation from the Planning Commission; and a public hearing before the City
Council.
Salt Lake City Code requires alley vacations meet at least one of the following policy considerations:
A-Lack of Use, B-Public Safety, C-Urban Design, or D-Community Purpose. Urban Design and Public
Safety are the factors for this request. The petitioner believes the alley is not a positive urban design
element and would be better used as part of their proposed development. They also believe the alley
contributes to crime in the area. SLCPD officers reportedly discussed in community meetings the motel
and alley are problem areas in the area, though no reports have been provided detailing the alley’s
contribution to crime.
Alley vacations are also required to include a petition with signatures of at least 75% of abutting property
owners indicating support of the proposed vacation. The petitioner received signatures from six of the eight
abutting property owners. There was no opposition to the alley vacation expressed by those who didn’t sign
the petition.
City Department Review
During City department and division review of the petitions, the Engineering Division expressed
opposition to the alley vacation, stating “SLC Engineering does not support the proposed alley vacation.
The power runs down the alley on both sides (with the transformers) and it appears that underground
utilities may also exist. They are parking vehicles in the alley currently.”
Public Utilities provided comments saying it does not have utility lines in the subject alley. They noted
private water and sewer lines likely are within the alley, but those are owned by the petitioner.
No objections or concerns were received from other responding City departments or divisions.
Page | 8
Analysis of Factors
Pages 50-52 of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be
considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see
the Planning Commission staff report for additional information.
Factor Finding
Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent
with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of
the city as stated through its various adopted
planning documents.
Complies
Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the
specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance.
Complies
The extent to which a proposed map amendment will
affect adjacent properties
Complies
Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent
with the purposes and provisions of any applicable
overlay zoning districts which may impose additional
standards.
Not applicable
(not within any
zoning overlays)
The adequacy of public facilities and services
intended to serve the subject property, including, but
not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational
facilities, police and fire protection, schools,
stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and
wastewater and refuse collection.
Complies
Pages 53-55 of the Planning Commission staff report includes an analysis of factors City Code requires the
Planning Commission to consider for alley vacations (Section 14.52.030 B Salt Lake City Code). In addition to
the information above, other factors are summarized below. Planning staff found the proposed alley vacation
complies with the factors below. For the complete analysis, please refer to the staff report.
•City Code required analysis: The City Police Department, Fire Department, Transportation Division
and all other relevant City departments and divisions have no reasonable objection to the proposed
disposition of the property.
Finding: Planning staff believes it complies. As noted above, City Engineering objected to the alley
vacation. Other City departments and divisions had no issues with the proposal or did not provide
comments. (Department review comments are found in Attachment H (page 95 of the Planning
Commission staff report).) Planning staff stated “The Engineering Department does not support the
request while Public Utilities has no objections. Part of the objections of Engineering concerned the
possible location of utilities underground in the alley. Public Utilities indicated that there may be some
water lines but did not have concerns. Since the site consists of multiple parcels to be combined, the
issue of utilities and any required relocation will be dealt with on an individual development proposal
under consideration.”
•City Code required analysis: The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations for closure,
vacation or abandonment of City owned alleys (Lack of Use, Public Safety, Urban Design, Community
Purpose).
Finding: Complies. Planning staff determined the proposed alley vacation satisfies the Urban Design
and Public Safety policy considerations.
Page | 9
•City Code required analysis: The petition must not deny sole access or required off-street parking to
any adjacent property.
Finding: Complies. Vacating the alley would not impact parking or sole access to any property.
•City Code required analysis: The petition will not result in any property being landlocked.
Finding: Complies. No property would be landlocked because of this alley vacation request.
•City Code required analysis: The disposition of the alley property will not result in a use which is
otherwise contrary to the policies of the City, including applicable master plans and other adopted
statements of policy which address, but are not limited to, mid-block walkways, pedestrian paths, trails,
and alternative transportation uses.
Finding: Closing the alley will not result in uses that are contrary to any City policy.
•City Code required analysis: No opposing abutting property owner intends to build a garage
requiring access from the property, or has made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has
been issued, construction has been completed within 12 months of issuance of the building permit.
Finding: Complies. No abutting property owners expressed opposition to the proposed alley vacation.
•City Code required analysis: The petition furthers the City preference for disposing of an entire
alley, rather than a small segment of it.
Finding: Complies. The alley does not pass fully through the block between Andrew Avenue and Van
Buren. Planning stated, “Since there is no continuation to the alley, for all intents and purposes this
remaining segment would act as an “entire alley” so this factor has been met.”
•City Code required analysis: The alley property is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to
residences or for accessory uses.
Finding: Complies. The alley is not necessary for rear access to residences.
It is Planning staff’s opinion that the proposed alley vacation generally meets the policy considerations and
factors for alley vacations. They noted the Engineering Division is opposed to the request, but those
objections did not consider redevelopment of the site which will likely remove or relocate utilities on the
site.
Consideration 6-Public Input and Concerns
Most comments received by the Planning Division regarding the proposal are in opposition to the rezoning.
Many people expressed frustration with the existing motel and other properties that are included in this
proposal creating neighborhood issues, and a desire for change. Concern with the proposed building’s
height and scale, along with resulting neighborhood impacts are the primary reasons people expressed for
their opposition. The Ballpark Community Council sent a letter to Planning staff outlining its opposition to
the proposed zoning amendments, and support of the alley vacation. This letter and other written
comments received prior to the Planning Commission public hearing are found on pages 57-94 of the
Planning Commission staff report. Comments received by Planning following the Planning Commission
staff report was published are found on pages 65-87 of the Administration’s transmittal.
ZONING COMPARISON
CC and R-1/5,000 vs. Proposed FB-UN2
The following table is found on pages 46-49 of the Planning Commission staff report. It is included here for
convenience.
Parameter CC Zone
(Existing)
R-1/5,000
(Existing)
FB-UN2
(Proposed)
Page | 10
Allowed Uses Multi-family and mixed-
use developments, gas
stations, alcohol uses,
animal cremation, art
gallery, food production,
various commercial retail
and service uses, assisted
living and support uses,
boarding house, funeral
home, crematoriums,
motel uses, offices,
school uses, commercial
parking, recreation,
storage uses, movie
theater, automobile sales,
service, repairs and
rentals among others.
Mostly single-family
detached uses.
Multifamily and
commercial uses are not
allowed. Some
government and
municipal and school
uses allowed as
conditional.
Dwellings to include
single, multi-family and
others, mixed use
developments, alcohol
uses, various commercial
retail and service uses,
assisted living and
support uses, assisted
living and support uses,
boarding house, funeral
home, clinic and medical
uses, motel uses, offices,
school uses and others.
Maximum Building
Height
30-feet by right 45-feet
through Design Review
28-feet to ridge for
pitched roofs or 20-feet
for flat roofed buildings.
50-feet for a multifamily
or mixed-use form. A
variety of other uses are
allowed and the height
limit varies. In the
absence of a specific
development proposal,
the applicant could build
any of the allowed uses
under the new zoning if it
were to be approved.
Front/Corner/Side/Rear
Yard Setbacks
Front and corner side
yards: 15 feet
Interior side: None
Rear yard: 10 feet
Front: The minimum
depth of the front yard
for all principal buildings
shall be equal to the
average of the front yards
of existing buildings
within the block face.
Interior side: Corner lots
– 4- feet Interior side for
Interior lots – 4 feet on
one side and 10 feet on
the other.
Rear yard: 25% of lot
depth or 20-feet,
whichever is less.
No minimum on front
and corner side.
Maximum 10 feet.
Side: 15-feet along a side
property line that that
abuts a residential zoning
district less than 35- feet
otherwise none.
Rear: Minimum 20 feet
along rear adjacent to
residential less than 35-
feet.
Required Build to Line Not applicable Not applicable Minimum of 50% of
street facing facade shall
be built to the minimum
setback line
Upper Lever Step Back None required Not applicable Buildings shall be
stepped back 1 additional
foot for every foot of
building height above 30'
along a side or rear
Page | 11
property line adjacent to
FBUN1 or any residential
zoning district that has a
maximum building
height of 35' or less,
unless the building is set
back from the property
line 45' or more.
Buffer Yard Required if abutting
single-family residential
Specific landscaping
requirements and trees
are required.
Not applicable No specific buffer
required but a 20-foot
rear yard is required and
upper building step
backs are required when
located adjacent to
residential.
Lot Size Minimum 10,000 SF 5,000 SF but cannot
exceed 7,000 SF
4,000 SF
Minimum Lot Width 75 feet Not specified 30 feet
Landscaped Yards 15-feet required on all
front and corner side
yards. Additional
landscaping required is if
additional building
height is allowed.
Required yards must all
be maintained as
landscaped yards.
Open Space Area: A
minimum of ten percent
(10%) of the lot area
must be open space area
which may include
landscaped yards, patio,
dining areas, common
balconies, rooftop
gardens, and other
similar outdoor living
spaces.
Off-street Parking &
Loading (21A.44.030)
The CC zone requires the
following for multi-
family uses: 2 parking
spaces for each dwelling
unit containing 2 or more
bedrooms 1 parking
space for 1 bedroom and
efficiency dwelling 1/2
parking space for single
room occupancy
dwellings (600 square
foot maximum)
Additional parking will
be required for the
commercial aspects of
the project. This varies
depending on the use.
Two parking spaces for
each single-family
residence. Additional
spaces required for other
uses when allowed.
No parking minimum
specified or required.
General Design
Standards:
• Ground floor uses
• Percentage glass
• Building materials
• Entrance Requirements
No general design
standards or
requirements if building
to 30-feet. If requesting
Design Review,
None specified for
commercial or multi-
family as they are not
allowed.
Ground floor uses
required
• 60% of ground floor
facing façade must be
glass
Page | 12
• Balconies
• Open space
requirements
additional elements may
be requested.
• 15% on all upper floors
on street facing facades.
• 70% of any street facing
building facade must be
clad in high quality,
durable, natural
materials
• Specific entrance
requirements based on
building type.
• Balconies required on
all street-facing units
• Open Space Required:
A minimum of ten
percent (10%) of the lot
area must be open space
area.
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
• November 19, 2021-Petition for zoning map and accompanying text amendment received by
Planning Division.
• February 1, 2022-Petitions for the master plan amendment and alley vacation received by
Planning Division.
Petitions assigned to David Gellner, Senior Planner.
• February 9, 2022-Information about petitions sent to Ballpark Community Council and Midtown
District Community Council. 45-day recognized organization input and comment period begins.
Online open house period begins.
Early notification sent to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the project site
providing information about the proposal and how to give public input.
• March 3, 2022-Planning staff attended an online meeting of the Ballpark Community Council.
• March 30, 2o22-45-day public comment period for recognized organizations ended.
• May 15, 2022-Applicant made changes to the original request which included a text amendment to
allow additional building height on these properties. The text amendment portion of the
application was withdrawn by the applicant.
• May 23, 2022-Notice sent to the Ballpark Community Council and all property owners and
residents within 300 feet of the development informing them of changes to the proposal,
specifically that the text amendment request allowing additional building height was withdrawn
by the applicant.
• July 14, 2022-Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning listserv for
the July 27, 2022 Planning Commission meeting. Public hearing notice mailed.
Public hearing notice posted on properties.
• July 27, 2022-Planning Commission public hearing. The Planning Commission voted
unanimously in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council for the
Page | 13
proposed master plan and zoning map amendments, and alley vacation.
• August 23, 2022-Ordinance requested from Attorney’s Office.
• September 6, 2022-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney’s Office.
• September 21, 2022-Transmittal received in City Council Office.
Salt Lake City Code for Alley Vacation
The process for closing or vacating a City-owned alley is outlined in Section 14.52 Salt Lake City Code.
14.52.010: DISPOSITION OF CITY'S PROPERTY INTEREST IN ALLEYS:
The city supports the legal disposition of Salt Lake City's real property interests, in whole or in part,
with regard to city owned alleys, subject to the substantive and procedural requirements set forth
herein.
14.52.020: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CLOSURE, VACATION OR
ABANDONMENT OF CITY OWNED ALLEYS:
The city will not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it receives a
petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one of the following
policy considerations:
A. Lack Of Use: The city's legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an
applicable plat; however, it is evident from an onsite inspection that the alley does not
physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public
right of way;
B. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful
activity, unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area;
C. Urban Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element;
or
D. Community Purpose: The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of
the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. (Ord. 24-02
§ 1, 2002)
14.52.030: PROCESSING PETITIONS:
There will be three (3) phases for processing petitions to dispose of city owned alleys under this
section. Those phases include an administrative determination of completeness; a public hearing,
including a recommendation from the Planning Commission; and a public hearing before the City
Council.
A. Administrative Determination Of Completeness: The city administration will determine whether
or not the petition is complete according to the following requirements:
1. The petition must bear the signatures of no less than seventy five percent (75%) of the
neighbors owning property which abuts the subject alley property;
2. The petition must identify which policy considerations discussed above support the petition;
3. The petition must affirm that written notice has been given to all owners of property located in
the block or blocks within which the subject alley property is located;
Page | 14
4. A signed statement that the applicant has met with and explained the proposal to the
appropriate community organization entitled to receive notice pursuant to title 2, chapter 2.60
of this code; and
5. The appropriate city processing fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule has
been paid.
B. Public Hearing and Recommendation From The Planning Commission: Upon receipt of a
complete petition, a public hearing shall be scheduled before the planning commission to
consider the proposed disposition of the city owned alley property. Following the conclusion of
the public hearing, the planning commission shall make a report and recommendation to the
city council on the proposed disposition of the subject alley property. A positive
recommendation should include an analysis of the following factors:
1. The city police department, fire department, transportation division, and all other relevant city
departments and divisions have no reasonable objection to the proposed disposition of the
property;
2. The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated above;
3. Granting the petition will not deny sole access or required off street parking to any property
adjacent to the alley;
4. Granting the petition will not result in any property being landlocked;
5. Granting the petition will not result in a use of the alley property which is otherwise contrary
to the policies of the city, including applicable master plans and other adopted statements of
policy which address, but which are not limited to, mid-block walkways, pedestrian paths,
trails, and alternative transportation uses;
6. No opposing abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the
property, or has made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has been issued,
construction has been completed within twelve (12) months of issuance of the building permit;
7. The petition furthers the city preference for disposing of an entire alley, rather than a small
segment of it; and
8. The alley property is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for
accessory uses.
C. Public Hearing Before The City Council: Upon receipt of the report and recommendation from
the planning commission, the city council will consider the proposed petition for disposition of
the subject alley property. After a public hearing to consider the matter, the city council will
make a decision on the proposed petition based upon the factors identified above. (Ord. 58-13,
2013: Ord. 24-11, 2011)
14.52.040: METHOD OF DISPOSITION:
If the city council grants the petition, the city owned alley property will be disposed of as follows:
A. Low Density Residential Areas: If the alley property abuts properties which are zoned for low
density residential use, the alley will merely be vacated. For the purposes of this section, "low
density residential use" shall mean properties which are zoned for single-family, duplex or twin
home residential uses.
Page | 15
B. High Density Residential Properties And Other Nonresidential Properties: If the alley abuts
properties which are zoned for high density residential use or other nonresidential uses, the
alley will be closed and abandoned, subject to payment to the city of the fair market value of
that alley property, based upon the value added to the abutting properties.
C. Mixed Zoning: If an alley abuts both low density residential properties and either high density
residential properties or nonresidential properties, those portions which abut the low density
residential properties shall be vacated, and the remainder shall be closed, abandoned and sold
for fair market value. (Ord. 24-02 § 1, 2002)
14.52.050: PETITION FOR REVIEW:
Any party aggrieved by the decision of the city council as to the disposition of city owned alley
property may file a petition for review of that decision within thirty (30) days after the city council's
decision becomes final, in the 3rd district court.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2022
(Amending the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 1518, 1530, 1540, 1546 South
Main Street and 1515 South Richards Street from CC Corridor Commercial District and R-
1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to FB- Neighborhood District; and vacating a city-
owned alley situated adjacent to properties located at 1518, 1530, 1540, South Main Street and
1515 South Richards Street)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to parcels of property located at 1518,
1530, 1540, 1546 South Main Street and 1515 South Richards Street (the “Properties”) to rezone
the Properties from CC Corridor Commercial District and R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential
District to the FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District; and vacating a city-owned
alley situated adjacent to properties located at 1518, 1530, 1540, South Main Street and 1515
South Richards Street (the “Alley”) pursuant to Petition numbers PLNPCM2021-01191,
PLNPCM2022-00065 and PLNPCM2022-00086, respectively.
WHEREAS, Urban Alfandre (“Developer”) submitted a petition to rezone the Properties
from CC Corridor Commercial District and R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to the
FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District pursuant to Petition number PLNPCM2021-
01191; a petition to amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map with
respect to the Properties from Corridor Commercial to High Mixed Use pursuant to petition
number PLNPCM2022-00065; and, a petition to vacate a city-owned alley situated between
properties located at 1518, 1530, 1540, South Main Street and 1515 South Richards Street
pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2022-00086; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held
a public hearing on July 27, 2022 on the aforementioned petitions, had a discussion, and voted to
forward a positive recommendation of approval to the Salt Lake City Council (the “City
Council”) to approve the zoning map amendment, future land use map amendment, and, alley
vacation pursuant to the petitions subject to the following conditions: (1) The housing being
removed from the site must be replaced, (2) The property for the vacated alley must be
integrated into the future development, and (3) the rezoned parcels must be consolidated through
the appropriate process; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the City
Council adopted the Ballpark Station Area Plan, which governs the area within which the
Properties are situated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council’s adoption of the Ballpark Station Area Plan makes
amending the Central Community Master Plan unnecessary; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has determined: that
adopting this ordinance to amend the Salt Lake City zoning map to change the underlying zoning
as set forth herein is in the city’s best interests, provided that the conditions provided herein are
met; that good cause exists to vacate the unnamed, city-owned alley described herein; and that
neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the alley vacation.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the parcels located at 1518 South Main Street (Tax ID No. 15-
13-278-011-0000), 1530 South Main Street (Tax ID No. 15-13-278-012-0000 and 15-13-278-
017-0000), 1540 South Main Street (Tax ID No. 15-13-278-013-0000), 1546 South Main Street
(Tax ID No. 15-13-278-014-0000) and 1515 South Richards Street (Tax ID No. 15-13-278-020-
0000), as more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated by
reference, shall be and hereby are rezoned from CC Corridor Commercial District and R-1/5,000
Single-Family Residential District to FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District.
SECTION 2. Vacating City-Owned Alley. That an unnamed, city-owned alley adjacent to
properties located at 1518, 1530, 1540, South Main Street and 1515 South Richards Street, which
is the subject of Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00086, and which is more particularly described on
Exhibit “A” attached hereto, hereby is, vacated and declared not presently necessary or available
for public use.
SECTION 3. Reservations and Disclaimers. The vacation is expressly made subject to
all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now
located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry
thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities,
including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said closure is also subject to any existing rights-
of-way or easements of private third parties.
SECTION 4. Conditions. The approval of this ordinance is conditioned upon the
following:
1. That Developer enter into a development agreement that requires the following:
a. The housing being removed from the site must be replaced with at least as many
dwelling units;
b. The property for the vacated alley must be integrated into the future development;
c. The rezoned parcels must be consolidated through the appropriate process;
d. Development of the Properties shall include a minimum of 1,000 square feet of
commercial space with frontage on Main Street;
e. Development of the Properties shall include a minimum of 10 two-bedroom
dwelling units;
f. Development of the Properties shall provide a minimum of ½ onsite parking
space per dwelling unit;
g. Development of the Properties shall include onsite bicycle maintenance facilities;
and
h. Development of the Properties shall include secure storage amenities for a
minimum of 15 bicycles.
2. The proposed method of disposition of the alley property shall be consistent with the
method of disposition set forth in Section 14.52.040 (“Method of Disposition”),
Chapter 2.58 (“City Owned Real Property”) of the Salt Lake City Code, and all other
applicable laws.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has
been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah
Code §10-3-713 as well as with the Salt Lake County Recorder (regarding the alley vacation).
The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish or record this ordinance until the
conditions are satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office for condition 1 and
by the Salt Lake City Real Property Manager for condition 2.
SECTION 6. Time. If the conditions identified in Section 5 above have not been met
within one year after adoption, this ordinance shall become null and void. The city council may,
for good cause shown, by resolution, extend the time period for satisfying the conditions
identified above.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2022.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2022.
Published: ______________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney
December 8, 2022
Exhibit “A”
Legal description of the properties and alley:
Property Parcels
1. Address: 1518 S Main Street
Tax ID No. 15-13-278-011-0000
2. Address: 1530 S Main Street
Tax ID No. 15-13-278-012-0000 and 15-13-278-017-0000
3. Address: 1540 S Main Street
Tax ID No. 15-13-278-013-0000
4. Address: 1546 S Main Street
Tax ID No. 15-13-278-014-000
5. Address: 1515 S Richards Street
Tax ID No. 15-13-278-020-0000
Property Legal Description
Lots 2 through 11, Block 3, Dieter & Johnson, Main Street Addition, according to the official plat thereof
as recorded as entry no. 24652, in Book C, Page 33, in the Office of the Salt Lake County Recorder.
ALSO:
Lots 12 through 20, and Lot 1, Block 3, Dieter & Johnson, Main Street Addition, according to the official
plat thereof as recorded as entry no. 24652, in Book C, Page 33, in the Office of the Salt Lake County
Recorder.
ALSO:
Lot 36, Herrick Subdivision, according to the official plat thereof recorded as entry no. 483594, Book H,
Page 70, in the Office of the Salt Lake County Recorder.
ALSO:
Lot 1, Block 3, Gabbott’s Addition, according to the official plat thereof recorded as entry no. 29055,
Book C, Page 65, in the Office of the Salt Lake County Recorder.
Alley Legal Description
A strip of land situate within Block 3, Dieter & Johnson, Main Street Addition, according to the
official plat thereof. Said plat recorded as entry no. 24652, in Book C, Page 33, in the Office of
the Salt Lake County Recorder; Said strip of land being described as follows:
All of that alleyway located within Block 3, Dieter & Johnson, Main Street Addition
Subdivision; Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 12, of said Block 3, And running thence
south 254.1 feet, more or less, along the west lines of lots 12 through 20, and lot 1 to the
southwest corner of said lot 1; thence west 16.5 feet (18.0 feet per Salt Lake City Atlas Plats),
more or less to the southeast corner of lot 2 of Block 3; thence north 254.1 feet, more or less
along the east line of lots 2 through 11 to the northeast corner of lot 11 of Block 3; thence east
16.5 feet (18.0 feet per Salt Lake City Atlas Plats), more or less to the point of beginning.
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT:1550 S Main Street Assemblage Rezone, Master Plan & Alley Vacation
PLNPCM2021-01191 and PLNPCM2022-00065 & 00086
STAFF CONTACT:David J. Gellner, AICP, Senior Planner, david.gellner@slcgov.com
(801) 535-6107
DOCUMENT TYPE:Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendations of the Planning
Commission to approve an Ordinance to amend the zoning map for the subject properties,
changing them from CC (Corridor Commercial) and R-1/5000 (Single-Family Residential) to FB-
UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood), to amend the Future Land Use Map in the Central
Community Master Plan from "Community Commercial" to "High Mixed Use", and, to vacate the
platted alley.
The Planning Commission recommendation of approval included the following additional
recommendations:
1. The housing being removed from the site must be replaced.
2. The property for the vacated alley be integrated into the future development.
3. The rezoned parcels must be consolidated through the appropriate process.
BUDGET IMPACT:None
9/21/2022
9/21/2022
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Urban Alfandre is requesting that the City amend the zoning
map and master plan for multiple contiguous property parcels located at approximately 1518, 1530,
1540, 1546 S Main Street and 1515 S Richards Street respectively. Some of the parcels have
duplicate addresses. The applicant is requesting to change the zoning of the properties from CC
(Corridor Commercial) and R-1/5000 (Single-Family Residential) to FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban
Neighborhood District). The original request also included a text amendment to allow additional
building height on the properties. That request was subsequently withdrawn by the applicant as
The Central Community Master Plan
Future Land Use Map designates the properties as "Community Commercial". The petitioner is
requesting to amend the future land use map for the parcels to "High Mixed Use". The applicant
has also requested to vacate an alley that runs through the properties. The applicant intends to
combine all parcels as well as the alley into one cohesive parcel under the new zoning in order to
develop a mixed use development on the approximately 2-acre consolidated site. No specific site
development proposal has been submitted at this time.
The subject properties and alley location are highlighted on the map exhibit below.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
Notice of the project and a formal letter requesting comments was sent to the Chairs of the
Ballpark and Midtown District Community Councils on February 9, 2022.
Staff sent an early notification announcement postcard about the project to all residents and
property owners located within 300 feet of the project site on February 9, 2022. The mailed
notice included project details, that recognized community organizations were aware of the
proposal and included information on how to access the online open house and give public input
on the project.
Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal. The Online
Open House period started on February 9, 2022 and ended on March 30, 2022.
Staff attended an online meeting held by the Ballpark Community Council on March 3, 2022.
The 45-day Recognized Organization comment period expired on March 30, 2022.
Comments submitted by the Ballpark Community Council are included in the Staff Report.
On May 15, 2022, the applicant made changes to the original request which included a text
amendment to allow additional building height on these properties. Based on the public
comments and working with Planning Staff, the text amendment portion of the application
was withdrawn by the applicant.
On May 23, 2022, Planning Staff sent a follow-up notice to the Ballpark Community
Council and all property owners and residents within 300 feet of the project site informing
them of changes to the proposal, specifically that the request for a text amendment to allow
additional building height had been withdrawn by the applicant.
Numerous public comments were submitted to staff in advance of the Planning
Commission Hearing as well as after the staff report was published. The most commonly
cited concerns about the proposal related to worries about how the village will impact crime
and other activities in the area. There were also comments in support of the proposal.
The public comments can be found in the Planning Commission Records Attachment
C Planning Commission Staff Report of July 27, 2022.
Additional written public comments received after the staff report was published can be
found in Exhibit 5 - Written Comments Received after the Staff Report was Published.
A Planning Commission Public Hearing was held on July 27, 2022. By unanimous vote,
the Planning Commission forwarded a Positive recommendation to City Council for all
three (3) petitions zoning map and master plan amendments & alley vacation.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a) PC Agenda of July 27, 2022 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes of July 27, 2022 (Click to Access)
c) Planning Commission Staff Report of July 27, 2022 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3. Original Petition
4. Mailing List
5. Written Comments Received after the Staff Report was Published
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2022
(Amending the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map and the zoning
of the properties located at 1518, 1530, 1540, 1546 South Main Street and
1515 South Richards Street from CC Corridor Commercial District and R-1/5,000 Single-Family
Residential District to FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District; and vacating
a city-owned alley situated adjacent to properties located at 1518, 1530, 1540, South Main Street
and 1515 South Richards Street)
An ordinance amending the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map and
amending the zoning map pertaining to parcels of property located at 1518, 1530, 1540, 1546
South Main Street and 1515 South Richards Street (the “Properties”) to rezone the Properties
from CC Corridor Commercial District and R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to the
FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District; Amending the Future Land Use Map with
respect to the Properties from Corridor Commercial to High Mixed Use; and vacating a city-
owned alley situated adjacent to properties located at 1518, 1530, 1540, South Main Street and
1515 South Richards Street (the “Alley”) pursuant to Petition numbers PLNPCM2021-01191,
PLNPCM2022-00065 and PLNPCM2022-00086, respectively.
WHEREAS, Urban Alfandre, the property owner and representative, submitted an
application to rezone the Properties from CC Corridor Commercial District and R-1/5,000 Single-
Family Residential District to the FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District pursuant to
Petition number PLNPCM2021-01191; an application to amend the Central Community Master
Plan Future Land Use Map with respect to the Properties from Corridor Commercial to High
Mixed Use pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2022-00065; and, an application to vacate a city-
owned alley situated between properties located at 1518, 1530, 1540, South Main Street and 1515
South Richards Street pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2022-00086; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held
a public hearing on July 27, 2022 on the aforementioned petitions, had a discussion, and voted to
forward a positive recommendation of approval to the Salt Lake City Council (the “City
Council”) to approve the zoning map amendment, future land use map amendment, and, alley
vacation pursuant to the petitions subject to the following conditions: (1) The housing being
removed from the site must be replaced, (2) The property for the vacated alley must be
integrated into the future development, and (3) the rezoned parcels must be consolidated through
the appropriate process.
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has determined: that
adopting this ordinance to amend the Salt Lake City zoning map to change the underlying zoning
as set forth herein is in the city’s best interests; that good cause exists to vacate the unnamed,
city-owned alley described herein; and that neither the public interest nor any person will be
materially injured by the alley vacation.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the parcels located at 1518 South Main Street (Tax ID No. 15-
13-278-011-0000), 1530 South Main Street (Tax ID No. 15-13-278-012-0000 and 15-13-278-
017-0000), 1540 South Main Street (Tax ID No. 15-13-278-013-0000), 1546 South Main Street
(Tax ID No. 15-13-278-014-0000) and 1515 South Richards Street (Tax ID No. 15-13-278-020-
0000), as more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated by
reference, shall be and hereby are rezoned from CC Corridor Commercial District and R-1/5,000
Single-Family Residential District to FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District.
SECTION 2. Amending the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map. The
Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map shall be and hereby is amended to change
the land use designation of the Properties identified in Exhibit “A” from Corridor Commercial to
High Mixed Use.
SECTION 3. Vacating City-Owned Alley. That an unnamed, city-owned alley adjacent to
properties located at 1518, 1530, 1540, South Main Street and 1515 South Richards Street, which
is the subject of Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00086, and which is more particularly described on
Exhibit “A” attached hereto, hereby is, vacated and declared not presently necessary or available
for public use.
SECTION 4. Reservations and Disclaimers. The vacation is expressly made subject to
all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now
located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry
thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities,
including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said closure is also subject to any existing rights-
of-way or easements of private third parties.
SECTION 5. Conditions. The approval of this ordinance is conditioned upon the
following:
1. The housing being removed from the site must be replaced.
2. The property for the vacated alley must be integrated into the future development.
3. The rezoned parcels must be consolidated through the appropriate process.
4. The proposed method of disposition of the alley property shall be consistent with the
method of disposition set forth in Section 14.52.040 (“Method of Disposition”),
Chapter 2.58 (“City Owned Real Property”) of the Salt Lake City Code, and all other
applicable laws.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has
been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah
Code §10-3-713 as well as with the Salt Lake County Recorder (regarding the alley vacation).
The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish or record this ordinance until the
conditions are satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee.
SECTION 7. Time. If the conditions identified in Section 5 above have not been met
within one year after adoption, this ordinance shall become null and void. The city council may,
for good cause shown, by resolution, extend the time period for satisfying the conditions
identified above.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2022.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2022.
Published: ______________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney
September 6, 2022
Exhibit “A”
Legal description of the properties and alley:
Property Parcels
1. Address: 1518 S Main Street
Tax ID No. 15-13-278-011-0000
2. Address: 1530 S Main Street
Tax ID No. 15-13-278-012-0000 and 15-13-278-017-0000
3. Address: 1540 S Main Street
Tax ID No. 15-13-278-013-0000
4. Address: 1546 S Main Street
Tax ID No. 15-13-278-014-000
5. Address: 1515 S Richards Street
Tax ID No. 15-13-278-020-0000
Property Legal Description
Lots 2 through 11, Block 3, Dieter & Johnson, Main Street Addition, according to the official plat thereof
as recorded as entry no. 24652, in Book C, Page 33, in the Office of the Salt Lake County Recorder.
ALSO:
Lots 12 through 20, and Lot 1, Block 3, Dieter & Johnson, Main Street Addition, according to the official
plat thereof as recorded as entry no. 24652, in Book C, Page 33, in the Office of the Salt Lake County
Recorder.
ALSO:
Lot 36, Herrick Subdivision, according to the official plat thereof recorded as entry no. 483594, Book H,
Page 70, in the Office of the Salt Lake County Recorder.
ALSO:
Lot 1, Block 3, Gabbott’s Addition, according to the official plat thereof recorded as entry no. 29055,
Book C, Page 65, in the Office of the Salt Lake County Recorder.
Alley Legal Description
A strip of land situate within Block 3, Dieter & Johnson, Main Street Addition, according to the
official plat thereof. Said plat recorded as entry no. 24652, in Book C, Page 33, in the Office of
the Salt Lake County Recorder; Said strip of land being described as follows:
All of that alleyway located within Block 3, Dieter & Johnson, Main Street Addition
Subdivision; Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 12, of said Block 3, And running thence
south 254.1 feet, more or less, along the west lines of lots 12 through 20, and lot 1 to the
southwest corner of said lot 1; thence west 16.5 feet (18.0 feet per Salt Lake City Atlas Plats),
more or less to the southeast corner of lot 2 of Block 3; thence north 254.1 feet, more or less
along the east line of lots 2 through 11 to the northeast corner of lot 11 of Block 3; thence east
16.5 feet (18.0 feet per Salt Lake City Atlas Plats), more or less to the point of beginning.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3. Original Petition
4. Mailing List
5. Written Comments Received after the Staff Report was Published
1. Project Chronology
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
PETITIONS: PLNPCM2021-01191 & PLNPCM2022-00065 & 00086 -
Zoning Map, Master Plan Amendment and Alley Vacation for
the 1550 S Main Street Assemblage
November 19, 2021 Petition for the zoning map & accompanying text amendment
received by the Salt Lake City Planning Division.
February 1, 2022 Petition for the master plan amendment received by the Salt Lake
City Planning Division.
February 1, 2022 Petition for the alley vacation received by the Salt Lake City
Planning Division.
All petitions assigned to David Gellner, Senior Planner, for staff
analysis and processing.
February 8, 2022 All applications deemed to be complete for further processing.
February 9, 2022 Information about all petitions was sent to the Chair of the Ball
Park Community Council and Midtown District Community
Council in order to solicit public comments and start the 45-day
Recognized Organization input and comment period.
February 9, 2022 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all
residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project
site providing information about the proposal and how to give
public input on the project.
February 9, 2022 Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on
the proposal. The Online Open House period started on February
9, 2022 and ended on March 30, 2022
March 3, 2022 Staff attended an online meeting of the Ball Park CC on March 3,
2022
March 30, 2022 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations
ended.
May 15, 2022 The applicant made changes to the original request which included
a text amendment to allow additional building height on these
properties. The text amendment portion of the application was
withdrawn by the applicant.
May 23, 2022 Staff sent a notice to the Ballpark Community Council and all
property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development
informing them of changes to the proposal, specifically that the
request for a text amendment to allow additional building height
was withdrawn by the applicant and was no longer part of the
proposal.
July 14, 2022 Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the
Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting of July
27, 2022. Public hearing notice mailed.
July 14, 2022 Public hearing notice signs with project information and notice of
the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the
properties.
July 27, 2022 The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on July 27, 2022.
By unanimous vote, the Planning Commission forwarded Positive
recommendations to City Council for the proposed zoning map and
master plan changes and the alley vacation.
2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2021-1191 and PLNPCM2022-00065
& 00086 Zoning Map, Master Plan Amendment and Alley Vacation for the 1550 S Main Street
Assemblage. Urban Alfandre is requesting that the City amend the zoning map and master plan for
multiple property parcels located at approx. 1518, 1530, 1540, 1546 S Main Street and 1515 S Richards
Street respectively. The existing alley that runs through the properties would be vacated as part of this
request. The intent of these petitions would be to combine all parcels as well as the alley into one
cohesive parcel under the new zoning in order to build a mixed-use/multi-family development on the
site. On July 27, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted to recommend
approval to the City Council for the following applications:
a. Zoning Map Amendment: The change the zoning from CC (Corridor Commercial) & R-1/5000
(Single-Family Residential) to FB-UN2 (Form-Based Urban Neighborhood) zoning district. Case
PLNPCM2021-01191
b. Master Plan Amendment - Change to the future land use map in the Central Community
Master Plan from Community Commercial to High Mixed Use. Case PLNPCM2022-00065
c. Alley Vacation: Request to vacate and close the platted alley to incorporate the area as private
property in the development. Case PLNPCM2022-00086
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments
regarding the petitions. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning
this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance
the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held:
DATE: TBD
TIME: 7:00 PM
PLACE: Electronic and in-person options.
451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah
** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person
opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located
at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including
WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments
may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an
email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are
shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call David
Gellner at 801-535-6107 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or
via e-mail at david.gellner@slcgov.com The application details can be accessed at
https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the tab and entering the petition numbers
PLNPCM2021-01191, PLNPCM202200065 and PLNPCM2022-00086.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com,
(801)535-7600, or relay service 711.
3. Original Petition
TO: David Gellner
CC: Wayne Mills
FROM: Urban Alfandre (Stephen Alfandre, Owner)
DATE: 5.16.2022
RE: Amendment to Rezone application on 1550 S Main Street Assemblage
David,
After extensive meetings with the community council, Planning Staff, and other neighborhood
stakeholders, we are requesting an amendment to our previous rezone application wherein we
requested additional height of 15 feet within the FB-UN2 zone to a maximum of 65 feet. We wish to
revise our application and not request the additional 15 feet within the FB-UN2 zone which would
result in a maximum height of 50 feet. It became clear to us that the neighborhood did not agree with
65 feet in height at this location and we want to align ourselves with their desire to see a project of
smaller scale.
Although we can technically achieve a 50 ft height limit via design review and planned development in
the current CC zone, we would rather work in the FB-UN2 zone for various reasons. Here is why we
believe the FBUN-2 zone at this location far exceeds using the CC zone for this project:
1. Higher Design Standards
The FB-UN2 zone has higher urban design standards than the CC zone, which we believe will
make for a better project. Creating a consistent street wall, enhancing walkability, requiring
more glass and balconies and patios, and ensuring architectural design will contribute to the
character of the neighborhood are all requirements of the FB-UN2 zone. We are proponents of
having more FB-UN2 zones because of how they demand for better urban design in our city.
2. Step-backs to create neighborhood compatibility
The FB-UN2 zone requires step-backs and setbacks from adjacent single-family properties which
creates appropriate transitions between our parcels and adjacent single family homes.
3. Active ground floor uses
The FB-UN2 zone requires a permitted use other than parking shall occupy at least 75% of the
width of any street-facing building façade which makes for much better ground floor pedestrian
interaction than the CC zone. Our intent is to create a dynamic ground floor experience for
pedestrians.
We also want to address two additional complaints the neighborhood has had about the FB-UN2
zone: parking and setbacks.
Parking the FB-UN2 zone does not require parking. We have offered (on numerous occasions)
to voluntarily add ample parking within the project via a development agreement with the City
Council to lessen the impact of on-street parking in the neighborhood. In fact, we have
voluntarily included parking on all of our projects in the FB-
been required to do so.
Setbacks a common complaint from the neighbors is the lack of setbacks required in the FB-
UN2 zone. We continue to advocate for zero setbacks within urban-pedestrian areas for the
following reasons:
1. There already exists a 30-ft setback between the property line and the street
at 1515 S Main street. Adding more setback to this existing condition would
amplify the unfriendly pedestrian experience that currently exists by
exacerbating the wide chasm between street-walls along Main Street, as seen
below. Wide streets with large setbacks is not good urban design for cities and
prohibits pedestrian scale, comfort and vibrancy.
2. The eastern side of Main Street has zero setbacks and
is recommending for the western side to also have zero
setbacks to create a unified urban street wall (of which we agree entirely).
create a pleasant contrast to surrounding suburban residenti
strong street wall helps facilitate pedestrian circulation as well as provide a
3. Setbacks are not intended to be active open space for community use and
actually do more to hurt vibrant pedestrian experiences in our opinion. In the
CC zone only 1/3 of the setback area is required to be landscaped with
vegetation which means the majority can be gravel or rocks
invite open-space users.
4. Our intention is to add some retail space on the ground floor and the FB-UN2
zone is much more conducive to creating an enhanced retail experience than
the CC zone. For instance, in the CC zone, surface parking lots are allowed,
anymore surface parking lots. The FBUN-2 zone requires strong street walls,
durable building materials and active ground floor uses which create a more
enhanced retail and pedestrian experience than what the CC zone requires.
The section of Main Street from 1300 S to 1700 S is dead. There is little-to-no
pedestrian activity currently and as major landowners in the neighborhood it
is our strong desire to revitalize this area through good urban design and retail
activation to create a vibrant pedestrian experience, that is currently not
found in this area. The CC zone is the wrong zone to encourage this type of
revitalization for the reasons mentioned above.
Thank you for your considering of our request.
Sincerely,
Stephen Alfandre
Founding Principal Urban Alfandre
Al
l
e
y
V
a
c
a
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Ur
b
a
n
A
l
f
a
n
d
r
e
Re
a
s
o
n
f
o
r
a
l
l
e
y
v
a
c
a
t
i
o
n
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
:
cu
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
s
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
c
r
i
m
e
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
b
y
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
i
s
l
a
n
d
i
n
t
o
o
u
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
e
c
a
n
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
b
e
t
t
e
r
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
r
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
Wr
i
t
t
e
n
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
a
l
l
e
y
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s
:
t
h
e
a
l
l
e
y
r
u
n
s
s
o
u
t
h
f
r
o
m
A
n
d
r
e
w
A
v
e
n
u
e
f
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
2
6
4
f
t
.
a
n
d
t
h
e
n
d
e
a
d
-
e
n
d
s
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
b
a
c
k
y
a
r
d
o
f
1
8
W
Va
n
B
u
r
e
n
A
v
e
.
T
h
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
t
h
r
u
-
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
V
a
n
B
u
r
e
n
a
v
e
.
T
h
e
a
l
l
e
y
i
s
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
4
f
t
w
i
d
e
.
www.urbanalfandre.com
February 3, 2022
RE: 1) Zoning Text Amendment; 2) zoning map amendment; and 3) master plan
amendment for 1550 South Main Street Assemblage
Summary
Urban Alfandre (UA) is the contract purchaser of an approximately 2 acre site with direct
frontage on Main Street and Andrew Avenue (exact parcel numbers shown below).
UA is requesting to re-zone these parcels from CC to FBUN-2 and to be listed in Table
voluntary development agreement to add off-street parking within the building and massing
that is sensitive to the adjacent parcels and neighborhood.
We believe FBUN-2 parcels that are listed in Table 21A.27.050.C is the appropriate zone for
the following reasons:
o The height of the proposed zone (65 ft) allows for maximum flexibility to achieve
the following design goals: 1) add sufficient off-street parking in the building; 2)
design ground floor retail with appropriate height;
o It is where we should be adding density located within a 10 minute walk to the
1300 S TRAX station which allows residents to enjoy transportation optionality and
not be dependent on a car
o It conforms with the proposed Ballpark master plan of activation, retail, and density
near transit and on major corridors
The current CC zone limits the height of our intended use to 45 ft which is insufficient for
off-street parking and retail on the ground floor.
The current use of the Main Street Motel is one that brings significant and recurring crime to
the neighborhood. The neighborhood stakeholders have all expressed strong desire to see
this use go away. Our intended use of a mixed-use residential and retail building will activate
the street and help make the entire neighborhood safer.
www.urbanalfandre.com
Report
We are pleased to submit this application to amend the current zoning from CC to FBUN-2 with
additional height at the properties highlighted below in blue, located at approximately 1550 S Main
Street, which is currently the Main Street Motel.
The parcel numbers are: 15132780200000, 15132780170000, 15132780120000, 15132780110000,
15132780120000, 15132780130000, 15132780140000 and the city-owned alley bifurcating these
parcels.
The purpose of this amendment is to redevelop this blighted, crime-ridden property into a mixed-
use project that would add housing not typically found in this neighborhood and neighborhood-
scaled commercial to this portion of Main Street, a major commercial thoroughfare, just blocks from
downtown and a ½ mile to the Ballpark TRAX.
A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned is as follows:
Our vision for this property is to rezone it from Commercial Corridor (CC) to FBUN-2 Corner Lot
for the following reasons:
1) Proximity to TRAX and location on a prominent corner of Main St a major corridor
connecting into downtown. This property is within a ½ mile from the Ballpark TRAX
stop, categorizing this location as a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD). The
following are benefits of successful Transit-Oriented Developments:
www.urbanalfandre.com
Create compact development within an easy walk of public transit and with
sufficient density to support transit ridership
Establish a hierarchy of transportation which places the pedestrian first, bicycle
second and auto third.
Create active places and livable communities that service daily needs and where
people feel a sense of belonging and ownership.
Incorporate retail into a development if it is a viable use at the location. Ideally
drawing customers both from both the TOD and a major street.
TOD strengthens urban development but also helps manage future regional
growth by encouraging growth to occur where the existing infrastructure is best
suited to address it. The benefits of this type of development include:
o More residents living close to commercial areas to support a strong, local
oriented economy.
o This reduces the overall cost of development and reduces negative
environmental impacts on air and water quality while creating community
oriented public places.
By optimizing land use and accessibility, Transit-Oriented Development
decreases traffic congestion, improves air quality and public health, lowers the
cost of living, and makes opportunities more accessible. (http://tod.org/)
Encourage the stabilization and revitalization of existing neighborhoods, as new
uses are designed to support existing neighborhood characteristics
o The stabilization of these parcels is an important part of making this
neighborhood safer to walk and take transit.
2) To add density and a mix of uses, in an appropriate scale, that contemplates future
growth of adjacent properties within the current zoning. Five-story, well designed mixed-
use buildings which are massed correctly, are appropriate for these parcels which are
situated on a prominent corner of Main Street which is a major commercial corridor
connecting the densest part of downtown, which is just a couple blocks away, to the
heart of the Ballpark neighborhood.
The neighborhood recently went through a zoning change to preserve single family
homes on the interior streets to accommodate more density on the main corridors of
Main Street and 1700 South. This proposal is compatible with this neighborhood
objective.
www.urbanalfandre.com
(Image 1)
buildings are found, just a couple of blocks north, to past 2100 South and the start of
South Salt Lake. FBUN-2 will serve as a transition zone of gentle density between
Downtown, the Ballpark Area which will become much more dense, according to the
Ballpark Area Plan (Draft), and downtown South Salt Lake.
The purpose of a Transition Area as described by the Salt Lake City TOD Documents is:
to provide a moderate level of land development intensity that incorporates the
principles of sustainable transit oriented development. The transition area is
intended to provide an important support base to the core area and transit
ridership as well as buffer surrounding neighborhoods from the intensity of the
core area. These areas reinforce the viability of the core area and provide
opportunities for a range of housing types at different densities. Transition areas
are generally located within a one-half (½) mile from the station platform, but
may vary based on the character of the area. Transition areas typically serve the
surrounding neighborhood; include a broad range of building forms that house a
mix of compatible land uses. The minimum desired density is ten (10) dwelling
units per acre. Commercial uses may include office, retail, restaurant and other
commercial land uses that are necessary to create mixed use neighborhoods.
Commercial uses can be clustered around intersections and along block faces to
create neighborhood nodes.
The zoning along this portion of Main Street is currently Commercial Corridor which
h the growth
trajectory of our city and the lack of housing options it is only a matter of time before
www.urbanalfandre.com
3) Extra height creates more livability and housing opportunities: The current CC zoning
gh a Planned Development process. A rezone to FBUN-2 Corner
Lot is only one story taller than what is currently allowed, however, the extra story and
height allows for much more flexibility to add more housing types not typically found in
this neighborhood, adequate onsite parking, and ground floor commercial with the
appropriate ceiling heights to attract desired local retail tenants, while also creating a
vibrant pedestrian experience.
(Slate, a project our team developed in the Central 9th neighborhood in the same FBUN-2 zone, has off-street parking and appropriate ceiling heights
for ground floor active commercial space
1. to add a material amount of housing
units not typically found in the neighborhood, with proper ground floor ceiling heights for
commercial space and provide enough off-street parking.
2. Setbacks are much larger than the east side of Main St causing an irregular urban wall and
public realm.
1) Creating more livable communities and neighborhoods through the appropriate transition of
multi-family housing and mixed land uses in designated areas
a) This zoning amendment would achieve this by redeveloping this detrimental use into a
multi-family, mixed-use project on Main Street, which is a major thoroughfare for
automobiles, but also denser multifamily housing and commercial space, which would
also make this neighborhood more livable for a wider range of people.
www.urbanalfandre.com
2) To have pedestrians use transit and walk comfortably to services, shopping and recreational
opportunities.
a) It is important to leverage parcels on major thoroughfares to create smart density to
support TRAX and BRT transportation systems. This site is a 10 minute walk to the
1300 South TRAX stop and is considered a transit-oriented site. This zoning amendment
is appropriate to this location and will achieve city-wide master plan, housing and TOD
goals by redeveloping it in a mixed-use, contextually sensitive way that promotes
walkability and vibrancy along a major commercial thoroughfare just blocks from
downtown.
3) To increase pedestrian accessibility by creating housing that supports the employment center
of the downtown area.
a) Leveraging this location, which is a 10 minute walk to TRAX, through creating more
housing will increase pedestrian accessibility and transit accessibility that will support the
employment center of downtown.
4) An enhanced built environment that encourages employees to work and live in the Central
Community
a) Adding housing types not typically found in this neighborhood, in a mixed-use setting,
that creates a more vibrant and walkable streetscape, while providing more services
within walking distance, creates a vibrant built environment which will attract more
people to live and work in this neighborhood.
This zoning amendment will achieve Salt Lake City Housing Affordability Priorities by:
1) Removing barriers which limit housing density, prohibit needed housing types or create
excessive developer burden.
a) This zoning amendment would achieve this by redeveloping this detrimental use into a
multi-family, mixed-use project on Main Street and provide units that are not typically
found in the neighborhood.
www.urbanalfandre.com
The above photos of recently delivered projects, Moda on Main and The Edith, which are larger
townhome units, comprise most of the new housing stock in this neighborhood. The rezone
would allow for something different more efficient residential units above ground floor retail,
which will deliver a more varied housing stock to the neighborhood.
2) Support the development of new or underutilized housing types that meet the unique needs
a) The proposed rezone would provide more housing types not typically found in this
neighborhood and in so doing, increase housing choices for a wider range of people in
this neighborhood.
3) Promote transit-oriented development, walkable communities and models that decrease the
need for cars or parking stalls.
a) Leveraging this TOD site into a mixed-use project that increases the walkability of Main
Street would accomplish this Priority.
Ballpark Area Plan (Draft)
While we understand that the Ballpark Area Plan has not been officially adopted yet, we
his project is in
presence of small local businesses, a generally pleasant pedestrian and bike environment, and
medium-density residential buildings. New development should focus on maintaining the
scale, walkability and bikability of the neighborhood.
o This project will implement the intent of the Main Street Character Area by:
Creating ground floor commercial space for local businesses
Creating a vibrant pedestrian experience through activation and design
including:
Street trees
ADA accessible
Human scaled building frontages
www.urbanalfandre.com
Pedestrian level street lighting
Store fronts, office windows, and windows on homes facing the
street
Enhancing the walkability and bikability of Main Street through design,
gentle density and a mix of uses.
The Ballpark Area Plan (Draft) also calls out for reduced setbacks on the west side of Main
Street to be equal with the setbacks on the east side of Main Street to create a more uniform
urban wall and public realm.
Our team is interested in executing a Development Agreement with the City to ensure the public
benefits of off-street parking, human scaled street frontages and ground floor commercial space are
incorporated in the new project.
This request, if approved, will amend the zoning map, future land use map in the master plan and
amend the text of the zoning ordinance.
Kindest regards,
James Alfandre
Founding Principal
Urban Alfandre, LLC
650 South 500 West #188
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
www.urbanalfandre.com
The above is a precedent image to show an example of street activation and sensitivity to
massing.
www.urbanalfandre.com
November 12, 2021
RE: Zoning Amendment for 1550 South Main Street Assemblage
Summary
Urban Alfandre (UA) is the contract purchaser of an approximately 2 acre site with direct
frontage on Main Street and Andrew Avenue (exact parcel numbers shown below).
UA is requesting to re-zone the property from CC to FBUN-2 Corner Lot with a
voluntary development agreement to add off-street parking within the building and
massing that is sensitive to the adjacent parcels.
We believe FBUN-2 Corner Lot is the appropriate zone for the following reasons:
o The height of the proposed zone (65 ft) allows for maximum flexibility to achieve
the following design goals: 1) add sufficient off-street parking in the building; 2)
design ground floor retail with appropriate height;
o It is where we should be adding density located within a 10 minute walk to the
1300 S TRAX station which allows residents to enjoy transportation optionality
and not be dependent on a car
o It conforms with the proposed Ballpark master plan of activation, retail, and
density near transit
The current CC zone limits the height of our intended use to 45 ft which is insufficient
for off-street parking and retail on the ground floor.
The current use of the Main Street Motel is one that brings significant and recurring
crime to the neighborhood. The neighborhood stakeholders have all expressed strong
desire to see this use go away. Our intended use of a mixed-use residential and retail
building will activate the street and help make the entire neighborhood safer.
www.urbanalfandre.com
Report
We are pleased to submit this application to amend the current zoning from CC to FBUN-2
Corner Lot at the properties highlighted below in blue, located at approximately 1550 S Main
Street, which is currently the Main Street Motel.
The parcel numbers are: 15132780200000, 15132780170000, 15132780120000,
15132780110000, 15132780120000, 15132780130000, 15132780140000 and the city-owned
alley bifurcating these parcels.
The purpose of this amendment is to redevelop this blighted, crime-ridden property into a
mixed-use project that would add housing not typically found in this neighborhood and
neighborhood-scaled commercial to this portion of Main Street, a major commercial
thoroughfare, just blocks from downtown and a ½ mile to the Ballpark TRAX.
A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned is as follows:
Our vision for this property is to rezone it from Commercial Corridor (CC) to FBUN-2 Corner
Lot for the following reasons:
1) Proximity to TRAX and location on a prominent corner of Main St a major
corridor connecting into downtown. This property is within a ½ mile from the
Ballpark TRAX stop, categorizing this location as a Transit-Oriented Development
(TOD). The following are benefits of successful Transit-Oriented Developments:
Create compact development within an easy walk of public transit and with
sufficient density to support transit ridership
www.urbanalfandre.com
Establish a hierarchy of transportation which places the pedestrian first,
bicycle second and auto third.
Create active places and livable communities that service daily needs and
where people feel a sense of belonging and ownership.
Incorporate retail into a development if it is a viable use at the location.
Ideally drawing customers both from both the TOD and a major street.
TOD strengthens urban development but also helps manage future regional
growth by encouraging growth to occur where the existing infrastructure is
best suited to address it. The benefits of this type of development include:
o More residents living close to commercial areas to support a strong,
local oriented economy.
o This reduces the overall cost of development and reduces negative
environmental impacts on air and water quality while creating
community oriented public places.
By optimizing land use and accessibility, Transit-Oriented Development
decreases traffic congestion, improves air quality and public health, lowers the
cost of living, and makes opportunities more accessible. (http://tod.org/)
Encourage the stabilization and revitalization of existing neighborhoods, as
new uses are designed to support existing neighborhood characteristics
o The stabilization of these parcels is an important part of making this
neighborhood safer to walk and take transit.
2) To add density and a mix of uses, in an appropriate scale, that contemplates future
growth of adjacent properties within the current zoning. Five-story, well designed
mixed-use buildings which are massed correctly, are appropriate for these parcels
which are situated on a prominent corner of Main Street which is a major commercial
corridor connecting the densest part of downtown, which is just a couple blocks
away, to the heart of the Ballpark neighborhood.
The neighborhood recently went through a zoning change to preserve single family
homes on the interior streets to accommodate more density on the main corridors of
Main Street and 1700 South. This proposal is compatible with this neighborhood
objective.
www.urbanalfandre.com
(Image 1)
densest buildings are found, just a couple of blocks north, to past 2100 South and the
start of South Salt Lake. FBUN-2 will serve as a transition zone of gentle density
between Downtown, the Ballpark Area which will become much more dense,
according to the Ballpark Area Plan (Draft), and downtown South Salt Lake.
The purpose of a Transition Area as described by the Salt Lake City TOD Documents
is:
to provide a moderate level of land development intensity that incorporates
the principles of sustainable transit oriented development. The transition area
is intended to provide an important support base to the core area and transit
ridership as well as buffer surrounding neighborhoods from the intensity of
the core area. These areas reinforce the viability of the core area and provide
opportunities for a range of housing types at different densities. Transition
areas are generally located within a one-half (½) mile from the station
platform, but may vary based on the character of the area. Transition areas
typically serve the surrounding neighborhood; include a broad range of
building forms that house a mix of compatible land uses. The minimum
desired density is ten (10) dwelling units per acre. Commercial uses may
include office, retail, restaurant and other commercial land uses that are
necessary to create mixed use neighborhoods. Commercial uses can be
clustered around intersections and along block faces to create neighborhood
nodes.
The zoning along this portion of Main Street is currently Commercial Corridor which
www.urbanalfandre.com
trajectory of our city and the lack of housing options it is only a matter of time before
.
3) Extra height creates more livability and housing opportunities: The current CC zoning
-2
Corner Lot is only one story taller than what is currently allowed, however, the extra
story and height allows for much more flexibility to add more housing types not
typically found in this neighborhood, adequate onsite parking, and ground floor
commercial with the appropriate ceiling heights to attract desired local retail tenants,
while also creating a vibrant pedestrian experience.
(Slate, a project our team developed in the Central 9th neighborhood in the same FBUN-2 zone, has off-street parking and appropriate ceiling
heights for ground floor active commercial space
reasons:
1. A maximum height to add a material amount of
housing units not typically found in the neighborhood, with proper ground floor ceiling
heights for commercial space and provide enough off-street parking.
2. Setbacks are much larger than the east side of Main St causing an irregular urban wall
and public realm.
1) Creating more livable communities and neighborhoods through the appropriate
transition of multi-family housing and mixed land uses in designated areas
a) This zoning amendment would achieve this by redeveloping this detrimental use into
a multi-family, mixed-use project on Main Street, which is a major thoroughfare for
www.urbanalfandre.com
automobiles, but also denser multifamily housing and commercial space, which
would also make this neighborhood more livable for a wider range of people.
2) To have pedestrians use transit and walk comfortably to services, shopping and
recreational opportunities.
a) It is important to leverage parcels on major thoroughfares to create smart density to
support TRAX and BRT transportation systems. This site is a 10 minute walk to the
1300 South TRAX stop and is considered a transit-oriented site. This zoning
amendment is appropriate to this location and will achieve city-wide master plan,
housing and TOD goals by redeveloping it in a mixed-use, contextually sensitive way
that promotes walkability and vibrancy along a major commercial thoroughfare just
blocks from downtown.
3) To increase pedestrian accessibility by creating housing that supports the employment
center of the downtown area.
a) Leveraging this location, which is a 10 minute walk to TRAX, through creating more
housing will increase pedestrian accessibility and transit accessibility that will support
the employment center of downtown.
4) An enhanced built environment that encourages employees to work and live in the
Central Community
a) Adding housing types not typically found in this neighborhood, in a mixed-use
setting, that creates a more vibrant and walkable streetscape, while providing more
services within walking distance, creates a vibrant built environment which will
attract more people to live and work in this neighborhood.
This zoning amendment will achieve Salt Lake City Housing Affordability Priorities by:
1) Removing barriers which limit housing density, prohibit needed housing types or
create excessive developer burden.
a) This zoning amendment would achieve this by redeveloping this detrimental use into
a multi-family, mixed-use project on Main Street and provide units that are not
typically found in the neighborhood.
www.urbanalfandre.com
The above photos of recently delivered projects, Moda on Main and The Edith, which are
larger townhome units, comprise most of the new housing stock in this neighborhood. The
rezone would allow for something different more efficient residential units above ground
floor retail, which will deliver a more varied housing stock to the neighborhood.
2) Support the development of new or underutilized housing types that meet the unique
a) The proposed rezone would provide more housing types not typically found in this
neighborhood and in so doing, increase housing choices for a wider range of people
in this neighborhood.
3) Promote transit-oriented development, walkable communities and models that decrease
the need for cars or parking stalls.
www.urbanalfandre.com
a) Leveraging this TOD site into a mixed-use project that increases the walkability of
Main Street would accomplish this Priority.
Ballpark Area Plan (Draft)
y released draft
Ballpark Station Area Plan, of which is defined by the presence of small local
businesses, a generally pleasant pedestrian and bike environment, and medium-density
residential buildings. New development should focus on maintaining the scale,
walkability and bikability of the neighborhood.
o This project will implement the intent of the Main Street Character Area by:
Creating ground floor commercial space for local businesses
Creating a vibrant pedestrian experience through activation and design
including:
Street trees
ADA accessible
Human scaled building frontages
Pedestrian level street lighting
Store fronts, office windows, and windows on homes facing the
street
Enhancing the walkability and bikability of Main Street through design,
gentle density and a mix of uses.
The Ballpark Area Plan (Draft) also calls out for reduced setbacks on the west side of
Main Street to be equal with the setbacks on the east side of Main Street to create a more
uniform urban wall and public realm.
Our team is interested in executing a Development Agreement with the City to ensure the public
benefits of off-street parking, human scaled street frontages and ground floor commercial space
are incorporated in the new project.
This request, if approved, will amend the zoning map.
Kindest regards,
James Alfandre
Founding Principal
Urban Alfandre, LLC
650 South 500 West #188
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
www.urbanalfandre.com
The above is a precedent image to show an example of street activation and sensitivity to
massing.
20211147
20211147
20211147
20211147
20211147
20211147
20211147
BASE MIDDLE TOP
20211147
PUBLIC REALM PRIVATE REALM
20211147
20211147
20211147
20211147
Updated
Alley Vacation or Closure
OFFICE USE ONLY
Received By: Date Received: Project #:
Project Name:
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
Location of the Alley:
Name of Applicant: Phone:
Address of Applicant:
E-mail of Applicant: Cell/Fax:
Applicant’s Interest in Subject Property:
Owner Contractor Architect Other:
Name of Property Owner abutting the alley (if different from applicant):
E-mail of Property Owner: Phone:
Please note that additional information may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate
information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and
made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public
review by any interested party.
AVAILABLE CONSULTATION
lanners are available for consultation prior to submitting this application. Please email
zoning@slcgov.com if you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application.
WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION
Apply online through the Citizen Access Portal. There is a step-by-step guide to learn how to submit
online.
REQUIRED FEE
Filing fee of $26
Plus additional fee for required public notices
SIGNATURE
If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required.
Signature of Owner or Agent: Date:
SA
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
Urban Alfandre - Stephen Alfandre 301-767-5148
steve@urbanalfandre.com 3017675148
colonialmotel@gmail.com
01/25/2022
1500 main street, east of Richards St; west of Main Street; south of Andrew Ave
650 S 500 W Suite 188 Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Contract purchaser
David Pope
8015779637
St
a
f
f
R
e
v
i
e
w
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Please include with the application: (please attach additional sheets electronically)
1. A letter explaining why you are requesting this alley vacation or closure.
2. A Sidwell map showing the area of the proposed alley vacation or closure. On the map please:
a.Highlight the area of the proposed alley vacation or closure.
b. Indicate with colored dot the property owners who support the petition.
c. Submit a digital (PDF) copy of the map.
3. A written description with measurements of the proposed alley vacation or closure.
A final legal description prepared by a licensed engineer will be required later.
4. The name, address and signatures of all abutting property owners who support the petition.
Petition must include the signatures of no less than 80% of the abutting property owners.
Signatures should be from the property owners and not from the property renters.
You may use the form attached to this application or provide your own form with signatures.
WHAT IS AN ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE?
As part of the subdivision process, early developers were required to create alleys which were then deeded to the
City. They were used for coal delivery, garbage pickup and other services. They also allowed access to garages. Today,
the City is officially the owner of these alleys. In situations where it can be demonstrated that there is an over-riding
public purpose for vacating the alley, the City may relinquish its property interest in the alley.
When an alley is next to or abuts a single family or duplex residential property, the City vacates the alley, divides it in
half, and the property is conveyed to the abutting property owners. If an alley is next to or abuts a non-residential, or
multifamily residential (3 or more dwelling units) property, the City may close the alley and then sell the land at fair
market value to the abutting property owners.
WHAT THE CITY CONSIDERS BEFORE VACATING OR CLOSING AN ALLEY Section 14.52.020
1. The City police department, fire department, transportation division, and all other relevant City departments
have no reasonable objection to the proposed disposition of the property;
2. Granting the petition will not deny sole access or required off-street parking to any property adjacent to the alley;
3. Granting the petition will not result in any property being landlocked;
4. Granting the petition will not result in a use of the alley property which is otherwise contrary to the policies of
the City, including applicable master plans and other adopted statements of policy which address, but which
are not limited to, mid-block walkways, pedestrian paths, trails, and alternative transportation uses;
5. No opposing abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the property, or has
made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has been issued, construction has been completed
within 12 months of issuance of the building permit;
6. The petition furthers the City preference for disposing of an entire alley, rather than a small segment of it; and
7.The alley property is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for accessory uses.
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
______ I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be
processed. I understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following items are
included in the submittal package.
PETITION TO VACATE OR CLOSE AN ALLEY
Name of Applicant:
Address of Applicant:
Date:
As an owner of property adjacent to the alley, I agree to the proposed vacation or closure. I understand that if my
property is a commercial business or a rental property with more than three (3) dwelling units, I will be required to pay
fair market value for my half of the alley.
Print Name Address Signature Date
Print Name Address Signature Date
Print Name Address Signature Date
Print Name Address Signature Date
Print Name Address Signature Date
Print Name Address Signature Date
Print Name Address Signature Date
Print Name Address Signature Date
Print Name Address Signature Date
Print Name Address Signature Date
Print Name Address Signature Date
Print Name Address Signature Date
Print Name Address Signature Date
Urban Alfandre - Stephen Alfandre
650 S 500 W Suite 188 Salt Lake City, UT 84101
01/25/2022
David Pope 1530 S Main Street Salt Lake City UT 84115
Four Holdings, Inc 1530 S Main Street Salt Lake City UT 84115
1/25/2022
1/25/2022
1518 S Main Street Salt Lake City, Ut 84115Four Holdings, Inc
1540 S Main Street Salt Lake CityDavid Pope
1546 S Main Street Salt Lake City UT 84115David Pope
1515 S Richards Street Salt Lake City UT 84115Four Holdings, Inc
18 W Van Buren Ave Salt Lake City 84115John R and Mary J Hargreaves
22 W Van Buren Ave Salt Lake City UT 84115Thelma Castaneda; Tammy Dryer
"See signature above"
"See signature above"
"See signature above"
"See signature above"
Updated /2 /2
Zoning Amendment
Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance Amend the Zoning Map
OFFICE USE ONLY
Received By:Date Received:Project #:
Name or Section/s of Zoning Amendment:
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
Address of Subject Property (or Area):
Name of Applicant:Phone:
Address of Applicant:
E-mail of Applicant:Cell/Fax:
Applicant’s Interest in Subject Property:
Owner Contractor Architect Other:
Name of Property Owner (if different from applicant):
E-mail of Property Owner:Phone:
Please note that additional information may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate
information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and
made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public
review by any interested party.
AVAILABLE CONSULTATION
If you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application, please contact Salt Lake City
Planning Counter at zoning@slcgov.com prior to submitting the application.
REQUIRED FEE
Map Amendment: filing fee of $1,0 plus $121 per acre in excess of one acre
Text Amendment: filing fee of $1,0 , plus fees for newspaper notice.
Plus, additional fee for mailed public notices. Noticing fees will be assessed after the application is
submitted.
SIGNATURE
If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required.
Signature of Owner or Agent:Date:
St
a
f
f
R
e
v
i
e
w
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Project Description (please electronically attach additional sheets. See Section 21A.50 for the
Amendments ordinance.)
A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment.
A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned.
List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area.
Is the request amending the Zoning Map?
If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed.
Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance?
If so, please include language and the reference to the Zoning Ordinance to be changed.
WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION
Apply online through the Citizen Access Portal. There is a step-by-step guide to learn how to submit online.
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
______ I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed. I
understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following items are included in the
submittal package.
4. Mailing List
5. Written Comments Received after the Staff Report was Published
Additional Public Comments from Ballpark CC and Residents 07/19/2022
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 10:32 PM Amy J. Hawkins < wrote:
Hello David Gellner and the Planning Division,
I attempted to forward some of the correspondence our neighborhood has recently exchanged with
Urban Alfandre regarding management of other nearby property in the Ballpark neighborhood.
Unfortunately it bounced back due to file size restrictions. I and other surrounding residents often sent
photos of evidence of our current situation. I am sorry that the photos won't make it into the report to
be considered by members of the Planning Commission, but hopefully the amount and tone of the
correspondence will still convey some of the important information.
It is also important to note that despite what surrounding residents have been told, as of the time that I
am writing this email, the buildings at 1450 S. Main Street are still standing and have yet to be
demolished. The surrounding neighborhood no longer believes that Urban Alfandre will be honest or
transparent with them regarding timelines or expectations regarding this or other properties in the
neighborhood. This is unfortunate.
***
Dear David Gellner, the Salt Lake City Planning Division, and Members of the Planning Commission,
As we approach next week's public hearing for the 1550 S Main Street Assemblage Zoning Map, Master
Plan, Zoning Text Amendments, and Alley Vacation, I am passing along some of the recent
correspondence between residents in the Ballpark neighborhood and Urban Alfandre concerning
another property assemblage of theirs one block to the north, at approximately 1450 S. Main Street. We
are still waiting for the buildings on this property to be demolished. While we wait, these unsecured
properties have attracted a considerable amount of drug dealing, sex work, bike chop shops, and
camping, causing the surrounding residents a great deal of stress. While there is currently fencing
around the property, it is not secure (as evidenced by the shopping carts that appear on the other side
of the fencing). Many emails to the property owners, Urban Alfandre, have gone unanswered for days,
or have never been answered at all.
It is deeply concerning to the residents of the Ballpark neighborhood that we have experienced
problems with these properties as they have been vacated and turned over to Urban Alfandre. Prior to
being owned by Urban Alfandre, these properties were occupied by a used car lot, a dog car care
business, and a closed electronics store, and were not extremely troubled properties. In contrast, the
1550 S. Main Street Assemblage properties that they wish to acquire and rezone include the Main
Street Motel, one of Salt Lake City's most troubled and crime-ridden properties. The Main Street Motel
is a notorious low budget motel that has often been the site of sex work, domestic abuse, drug sales and
use, and has been involved with several recent homicides in our neighborhood in the past few years.
If Urban Alfandre cannot responsibly manage the transitioning of an unproblematic used car lot and dog
day care without causing such a dramatic uptick of crime to the surrounding neighborhood, they should
not be allowed to manage the transition of one Salt Lake City's most troubled properties. The
consequences for the neighborhood will not be trivial. Given the history of the property and the Salt
Lake Police Department SWAT team that has had to visit this year while it has been occupied and
managed, it is not an exaggeration to say that human lives will be at risk during any gap between its
current style of management and complete demolition.
I welcome my other Ballpark neighbors to submit further comments about their experience in our
neighborhood to zoning@slcgov.com and David.Gellner@slcgov.com while Urban Alfandre has been
responsible for managing the unoccupied 1450 S. Main Street properties.
Sincerely,
Amy J. Hawkins, PhD
Chair, Ballpark Community Council
facebook.com/BallparkCC/
From:Jeff Sandstrom <>
Date:July 8, 2022 at 7:54:02 AM MDT
To:James Alfandre <
Cc:Amy Hawkins <
Subject:Security breach
Good morning James.
On my morning walk, I noticed that the fences have been breached both on main street and on
the Alley side of your property. I saw a homeless person leaving through the front fence in front
of the dog building, they have simply pulled the post out of the ground and opened the fence.
They have a shopping cart inside. Plus, you might check the security of the dog building it
almost appears that someone could be Camping inside with a blanket in the interior doorway. In
the back alley, part of the new fence has been Opened to expose a hole in the old fence.
Thanks, Jeff Sandstrom
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 6:27 PM John Allison <> wrote:
Hey James,
We are looking forward to that new, no trespassing signs and fence going up tomorrow. I just
took a picture of some folks camping out in the alley rummaging through the trash inside the
current fence boundaries.
Thanks,
John
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022, 2:58 PM James Alfandre > wrote:
John,
Thanks for the update. The 'No Trespassing' signs will be added this afternoon, and more
cleanup will continue throughout the week. Construction perimeter fencing is being installed on
Friday.
James
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 1:38 PM John Allison > wrote:
Hi James,
It looks like some clean up has happened at your property and the homeless camp has finally
been removed. We also look forward to you adding the city approved "no trespassing" signs so
this doesn't happen again while the property gets redeveloped into much needed new housing.
I know you've said that there have been delays in the demolition but the faster it can look like
the lot at 1700 S and W Temple (pic attached) the better it will be for the community to not have
so many people attracted to the empty buildings like a month to a flame. I am sure there are
supply chain and labor shortage issues but an expedited demolition of the property will keep
people from using it. I walk my dog every day past 1700 S and W Temple lot and have never
seen a squatter there because it is very unappealing since there is a clear line of sight to the
roads.
Additionally, I noticed another hole has been cut into the fence (see attached pic).
Thanks,
John
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 9:22 PM Ryan O'Mahony <> wrote:
James,
With the exponential growth of drug activity and trash buildup since the tenants have left a few
weeks ago, the thought of another few weeks has me frightened. As Amy mentioned, we can no
longer walk along your property and feel safe. I have been calling the police multiple times a
day between the encampments, drug use and break ins.
Please help the neighborhood by at least cleaning up and securing the perimeter of the property
prior to Dominions work. The lot literally looks like a junk yard, and to be honest I am
embarrassed to live next to something like this. Please let us know if there is something we can
do to expedite the process. Thank you.
W Merrimac Ave
From:Amy J. Hawkins <>
Date: Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: request for update on demolition timeline
To: James Alfandre <>
Hi James,
Your response deeply concerns me because on June 10th you wrote and told us that you were
planning to demo the buildings next week, which would have been June 13th - June 17th. Will
you write to us two weeks from now on July 11th, and let us know of another delay?
I'm sorry if I wasn't perfectly clear in my previous email. Given the current situation on our street,
a minimum of two weeks is going to be a very long time to wait. We do not feel safe walking
down our street. I do not feel safe exiting my front door, because it is in full view of this camp,
and its occupants have seen me speaking with police officers. The occupants of this camp
appear to be friendly with drug dealers. Who can we call to help you obtain your permits faster?
I mean this *very literally*. We are willing to make calls and make contacts for you. Please take
advantage of this opportunity. I need you to help us answer this question so we can feel safer,
sooner.
Best regards,
Amy J. Hawkins, PhD
Chair, Ballpark Community Council
facebook.com/BallparkCC/
---
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 6:43 PM andrew mauss <> wrote:
Hello,
Also a concerned neighbor here. I have noticed and have videos showing the uptick in people
camping and browsing the back yards in my ally. It is up 10x since the buildings have been
vacant. There is a mostly permanent living situation between the trailers. The door on the pet
boarding place was wide open last week and there where at least 3 people hanging out in there.
The fact that the trailer on the street is allowed to be there is 100 precent because the building
is vacant. It is unacceptable that the only thing that has been done to secure them is some
plywood and it didn't even happen until last week or so. I am a general contractor and have
been involved with multiple projects very similar to what this one seems to be, and the fact that
nothing is being done there because of dominion is ridiculous. The properties could have been
secured and patrolled, as well as all what I am almost positive is hazmat stuff left in the
dealership. That could all have been removed prior to the excavators coming in to
demo. Ultimately these properties are your responsibility now and should be kept accordingly.
Hi James,
I second all of Amy and John's frustrations and concerns!
It seems clear that leaving these buildings abandoned for this length of time seems to be
nothing less than poor planning on you and your firm's part. As an outsider looking in, it
is perplexing how much time you have had to prepare for this (over a year) and how horrible it is
going. And placing all the responsibility on Dominion seems to be passing the buck.
Gary's property still has multiple semi trucks that are still full of materials that he has been
slowly unpacking. Given the speed at which he is unloading those I don't get the sense that he
is under any pressure to move out, which makes me question the real timeline of this
demolition.
Are there parts of the property that you can begin to clear/clean up. For example, the section of
alleyway behind my house (middle of the alleyway) has huge bushes that are on George's
property. This provides a place for the homeless to hide out and there is a huge encampment
there (in the alleyway and on George's property). There is a permanent fire pit next to the road
where people are burning the plastic coating off copper wire they are selling.
Additionally the old auto body shop and dog daycare has a ton of large item trash (stoves,
refrigerators, ATV) that could be moved and cleaned up. Getting rid of that trash would make
your properties look less inviting for people who are passing by and interested in
scavenging. Right now it looks like a junkyard.....is it really that surprising homeless people are
breaking in to see what they can steal.
Two (or more) weeks of this is unexceptable and we all know that enforcement alone isn't going
to change this.
Please share more options for what you are going to do.
Best, Jason
From:James Alfandre >
Date: Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: request for update on demolition timeline
Dominion Gas is working with SLC now to obtain a permit to work in the right of way to kill their
lines. We are hopeful that it will be resolved soon. The asbestos should be remediated in the
buildings shortly. We're still a couple of weeks away from being able to receive the demo permit,
it sounds like, but are doing what we can to expedite.
We are working on expediting the perimeter construction fencing and will monitor the property
on a regular basis and will work with the local police officers to assist.
James
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 2:56 PM John Allison <j > wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'd just like to add to what Amy has stated in the previous email(s) and add a few pictures. It is
my hope that Dominion Power and RMP will expedite the process of cutting gas and power to
these properties so demolition of these buildings can begin immediately. Because the fence has
been compromised people are coming and going from the buildings constantly throughout the
day and night. It has overwhelmed our section of the neighborhood and they are now looking for
power out of our outlets on private property. Some have been so audacious to just "squat" on
our front porches. All of this activity has greatly increased because these empty buildings are
still here and accessible.
Is there not anything that we can do to help this process along? The dry cleaner on the corner of
1700S and W. Temple was abandoned and quickly demolished and there hasn't been any
squatting on the property. Why can't this be done for this property?
Thanks for your time,
John
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:53 AM Amy J. Hawkins wrote:
Thank you, James. Again, we are happy to help make phone calls to expedite the demo permit.
Please let us know what we can do.
We realize the fencing would have to be fairly substantial and a big step up from decorative
garden fencing currently surrounding the trailers to effectively secure the property and prevent
camping.
The encampment that I photographed on Sunday morning was broken down and moved to the
east side of your building by Sunday afternoon. Additionally, a trailer parked on the north side of
the street on Merrimac Avenue and spent the night on the street, where people used drugs and
visited your property and our townhomes throughout the night (Dan Thomas a Ballpark
Community Council Board Member who is copied on this email, can verify the latter, having
messaged me at 11:41 pm about telling a transient person to stop using our external power and
to leave our property--they returned to their camper.
Thankfully, multiple neighbors and police communicated about the trailer today and have
informed its occupants that they need to leave the street. Profound thanks to Lieutenant Steve
Wooldridge and Sergeant Allen Christiansen and their officers for their policing of the Ballpark
neighborhood, and for the officers who visited throughout the day and evening yesterday.
James, please let us know what we can do to advocate for securing the property and expediting
your permits. We will continue to have issues with camping, drug use, dealing and other issues
that transient populations attract until this is resolved.
Amy J. Hawkins, PhD
Chair, Ballpark Community Council
facebook.com/BallparkCC/
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 9:14 AM James Alfandre < wrote:
Thank you for this update. I am sorry the neighbors have had to deal with this.
We are working to get fencing up to secure the property and to get the encampment gone while
We are hoping to have the fencing up within the next day or two and will have the encampment
removed today.
James
On Jun 26, 2022, at 10:49 PM, Amy J. Hawkins <> wrote:
Hi James,
neighbors have
asked me to contact you again within the past 48 hours.
Their questions are being prompted by the fact your unsecured property is now a known vector
for a criminal element in Salt Lake City. We have experienced a dramatic increase in criminal
activity and it has become dangerous . Regarding both demolition and construction, I think your
property manager should anticipate needing to take increased security measures to protect both
your property and the surrounding neighborhood. I hope the surrounding neighborhood is still of
concern to you.
As I write this email to you now at 9:24 pm on Sunday evening, it is listening to police officers
break up yet another encampment on your property (which I can hear from inside my home).
We watched officers enter through the fence surrounding the property because it is, as a
Between this past Thursday afternoon, last night, and today, the transient population that the
property has attracted to our neighborhood has had a profound impact on the lives of the
residents of the surrounding blocks who are trying to live above the law. I have spent at least 8
hours of the past week dealing with issues surrounding the dramatically increased transient
population on our block and in our alley, including calling 911, the non-emergency dispatch
number, and submitting video and photo evidence to the police department, SLC mobile app
and Civil Enforcement about break ins and new damage to our surrounding community. For
o your
property when we woke up this morning and it was this encampment that also prevented us
from feeling as if we could safely walk in our neighborhood last night, knowing that folks were
watching us enter and leave our home.
If there is anything that the neighborhood can do to help advocate to further secure the future
process of demolition, please let us know. I would be more than happy to place a phone call
with Dominion Power or any other service provider to help expedite the process, or to ask the
would be eager to help out a neighborhood that already experienced two homicides in May
2022.
This situation is intolerable. Please let us know what you will do to help alleviate it as soon as
possible.
Sincerely,
Amy J. Hawkins, PhD
Chair, Ballpark Community Council
facebook.com/BallparkCC/
---
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 1:06 PM Rob Phillips <r > wrote:
James -
I am one of the owners of the business across the street, RoHa Brewing Project.
From this email it sounds like you are looking to demo and develop that space along Kensington
and Major Street. We look forward to any improvement.
If we can support you in this effort in any way - please let me know.
We are doing all we can to improve the neighborhood, and increase walking traffic.
Please let me know if you need anything, my contact information is below.
Thank you,
Rob
Rob Phillips
work
cell
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:49 PM James Alfandre < wrote:
Amy,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We were planning to demo the buildings next week,
however, we are waiting on Dominion Energy to kill the gas meters and haven't received a date
for when that will be yet.
We will get the property secured and boarded as soon as we can.
James
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 11:35 AM Amy J. Hawkins > wrote:
Hello Salt Lake City Civil Enforcement and Urban Alfandre,
I'm writing to let you know that the Ballpark neighborhood is having problems with the
unsecured buildings at 1450 S. Main Street (at the corner of Merrimac Avenue and Main Street)
being repeatedly broken into by transient folks coming through the neighborhood. Multiple
residents have reached out to me this week to let me know that these unsecured buildings are a
serious problem, including Arika Schockmel, whose 11-year old daughter was recently solicited
on her bicycle at the end of her block as if she was a sex worker.
Our neighbor and Ballpark Community Council board member Jeff Sandstrom has just reached
out to our Salt Lake Police Department Community Liaison Office Detective Fallows (thanks
very much for being proactive, Jeff!), but I'm hoping that this can possibly be solved faster by
Civil Enforcement and the current property owners and developers working together to secure
the property before it is safely demo'ed.
Could we be given a timeline to know when the buildings might be demo'ed? What can we do to
help alert you to future problems to circumvent this situation in the future?
Thank you for your help,
Amy J. Hawkins, PhD
Chair, Ballpark Community Council
----------Forwarded message ---------
From:Jeff S >
Date: Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 11:17 AM
Subject: Increase in homeless campers, unsecured building
To:
Cc: Amy Hawkins , Dan Thomas
<>, Nannette Condie Rob
Philips <>, Catherine Cargill <>,
Jason Sch <j >
Hello Detective Fallows:
We have an increase in homeless campers in the alleys. The alley between Main Street and
Major street, behind Condie's Candy has been reported an an ongoing problem, especially in
the evening and nighttime hours. An expanding number of people have been hanging out
behind the business. Condies have called the police about this several times.
The alley between Andrew Avenue and Merrimac Avenue just west of Main Street also has
another camp in the middle of the alley. They are frequently blocking the right of way in the
alley.
I also reported the abandoned building at 1450 S Main on the City's app for having been broken
into. The entire back of the building is wide open, with two garage door open. The building
needs to be boarded and secured asap. The tenant has moved out and it is going to be
redeveloped soon. Someone has cut the fence from the alley into the rear of the property, as
well.
If you could put these issues on your team's radar, we would really appreciate the help.
Thanks,
Jeff Sandstrom, board member, Ballpark Community Council
S Main Street
DAVID J.GELLNER,MAG, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
DAVID J.GELLNER,MAG, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
DAVID J.GELLNER,MAG, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
DAVID J.GELLNER,MAG, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
MARY BETH THOMPSON
Chief Financial Officer
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
___________________________________ Date Received: _______________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: __________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: December 6, 2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT: Budget Amendment #4 – Revised December 6, 2023
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director (801) 535-6394 or
Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403
DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing,
the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY2022-23 adopted budget.
BUDGET IMPACT:
REVENUE EXPENSE
GENERAL FUND $ 194,600.00 $ 2,774,764.00
CIP FUND 91,967,957.90 96,317,957.90
GOLF FUND 25,700.00 46,800.00
FLEET FUND 1,119,900.00 10,678,500.00
DEBT SERVICE FUND (2,951,726.95) (2,951,726.95)
WATER FUND 260,687.00 260,687.00
IMS FUND 2,627,420.00 2,782,449.00
MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS FUND 8,065,151.00 8,065,151.00
TOTAL $ 101,309,688.95 $117,974,581.95
12/06/2022
12/06/2022
Lisa Shaffer (Dec 6, 2022 16:47 MST)
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Revenue for FY 2022-23 Budget Adjustments
The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2023.
Initial projections for fiscal year 2023 projections continue to be positive. Sales tax is currently
projected to exceed budget by $1.5 million while the sales tax associated with Funding Our
Future is projected to exceed budget by $750K. Building permits continue to stay strong
projecting to be over budget by $123,504. Charges and services is projecting to be over budget
because of strong numbers from police service revenues, while miscellaneous revenue shows an
increase over budget due to an increase in fuel reimbursement costs. The City is also projecting a
large surplus due to the rising interest rates.
While these numbers are positive, the Administration continues to wait for fiscal year 2022 to be
closed and will provide updates to Council as the audit progresses.
FY22-23 FY22-23 Amended Variance
Annual Ammended Revised Favorable
Revenue Budget Budget Forecast (Unfavorable)
Property Taxes 125,012,927 125,012,927 125,012,927 -
Sales and Use Tax 105,050,018 105,050,018 106,550,018 1,500,000
Franchise Tax 11,657,129 11,657,129 11,640,553 (16,576)
PILOT Taxes 1,638,222 1,638,222 1,638,222 -
TOTAL TAXES 243,358,296 243,358,296 244,841,720 1,483,424
License and Permits 40,736,114 40,736,114 40,859,618 123,504
Intergovernmental 4,644,622 4,644,622 4,657,592 12,970
Interest Income 2,071,154 2,071,154 2,771,154 700,000
Fines & Forfeiture 3,765,174 3,765,174 3,740,501 (24,673)
Parking Meter Collection 2,635,475 2,635,475 2,635,475 -
Charges and Services 4,432,794 4,432,794 4,614,603 181,809
Miscellaneous Revenue 3,438,710 3,438,710 3,583,408 144,698
Interfund Reimbursement 24,431,717 24,431,717 24,431,717 -
Transfers 28,821,993 34,921,993 34,729,993 (192,000)
TOTAL W/OUT SPECIAL TAX 358,336,049 364,436,049 366,865,781 2,429,732
Sales and Use Tax - 1/2 cent 44,364,490 44,364,490 45,114,490 750,000
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 402,700,539 408,800,539 411,980,271 3,179,732
Including proposed changes for BA#4 fund balance would be projected as follows for FY2023:
Adjusted fund balance is projected to be at 16.12%.
FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL
Beginning Fund Balance 6,625,050 82,617,126 89,242,176 6,625,050 109,660,920 116,285,970 12,906,520 99,464,558 112,371,078
Budgeted Change in Fund Balance 2,924,682 (7,810,302) (4,885,620) (2,879,483) (15,335,334) (18,214,817) (2,100,608) (20,736,262) (22,836,870)
Prior Year Encumbrances (3,733,743) (6,165,453) (9,899,196) (1,879,654) (10,259,789) (12,139,443) (1,800,000) (8,000,000) (9,800,000)
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 5,815,989 68,641,371 74,457,360 1,865,913 84,065,797 85,931,710 9,005,912 70,728,296 79,734,208
Beginning Fund Balance Percent 14.51%23.16%22.13%3.62%23.89%21.30%19.07%18.70%18.74%
Year End CAFR Adjustments
Revenue Changes - - - - - - - - -
Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) - (5,676,583) (5,676,583) - (7,535,897) (7,535,897) (7,535,897) (7,535,897)
Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 5,815,989 62,964,788 68,780,777 1,865,913 76,529,900 78,395,813 9,005,912 63,192,399 72,198,311
Final Fund Balance Percent 14.51%21.24%20.44%3.62%21.75%19.43%19.07%16.70%16.97%
Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance (1,000,000) (15,858,313) (16,858,313)
BA#1 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - -
BA#1 Expense Adjustment - - 5,138,235 5,138,235 - (475,000) (475,000)
BA#2 Revenue Adjustment - - 490,847 490,847 - - -
BA#2 Expense Adjustment - - (986,298) (986,298) - - -
BA#3 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - 6,000,000 6,000,000
BA#3 Expense Adjustment - (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (2,000,000) - (6,538,000) (6,538,000)
BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - 1,508,044 1,508,044 - 194,600 194,600
BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - (4,242,779) (4,242,779) - (2,774,764) (2,774,764)
BA#5 Revenue Adjustment - - 400,000 400,000 - - -
BA#5 Expense Adjustment - - (400,000) (400,000) - - -
BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - -
BA#6 Expense Adjustment - - (1,553,938) (1,553,938) - - -
BA#7 Revenue Adjustment - - (794,641) (794,641) - - -
BA#7 Expense Adjustment - (1,200,000) (10,843,298) (12,043,298) - - -
Change in Revenue 7,298,201 10,388,598 17,686,799 11,139,999 23,083,587 34,223,586 - - -
Change in Expense - - - 2,100,608 12,134,899 14,235,507
Fund Balance Budgeted Increase - - - - - - - - -
- - - Adjusted Fund Balance 12,114,190 57,495,073 69,609,263 12,906,520 99,464,558 112,371,078 9,005,912 59,599,235 68,605,147
Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 30.21%19.40%20.69%25.06%28.26%27.86%19.07%15.75%16.12%
Projected Revenue 40,095,707 296,422,894 336,518,601 51,499,136 351,910,770 403,409,906 47,215,097 378,322,311 425,537,408
FY2021 FY2023 BudgetFY2022 Projection
The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $101,309,688.95 of revenue and
expense of $117,974,581.95. The amendment proposes changes in eight funds, with three FTEs.
The amendment also includes the use of $2,580,164.00 from the General Fund fund balance. The
proposal includes 33 initiatives for Council review.
A summary spreadsheet document, outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The
Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council.
The amendment has been revised to clarify the need for item A-5 due to timing of the issuance of
the GO Bond.
The budget opening is separated in eight different categories:
A. New Budget Items
B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources
C. Grants for New Staff Resources
D. Housekeeping Items
E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
F. Donations
G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards
I. Council Added Items
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
Alejandro Sanchez (Dec 6, 2022 16:41 MST)
Alejandro Sanchez
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2022
(Fourth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including
the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-2023)
An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2022 which adopted the
Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2022, and Ending
June 30, 2023.
In June of 2022, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City,
Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
2022, and ending June 30, 2023, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the
Utah Code.
The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with
the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments
to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically
stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and
inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document as provided above, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of
Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized
by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2022.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any
amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes
2
specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the
same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any
amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning
July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128
of the Utah Code.
SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is
authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any
amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in
the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2022.
________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________
Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed
_________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _________ of 2022.
Published: ___________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
___Jaysen Oldroyd________
Jaysen Oldroyd
Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 Elections Awareness GF - 38,509.00 One-time -
2 Repurpose Operation Rio Grande Funds for
New Homelessness Services GF - 274,000.00 One-time -
2 Repurpose Operation Rio Grande Funds for
New Homelessness Services GF - 177,847.00 One-time -
2 Repurpose Operation Rio Grande Funds for
New Homelessness Services GF - 30,000.00 One-time -
2 Repurpose Operation Rio Grande Funds for
New Homelessness Services GF - 9,000.00 One-time -
3 Dee Glen Tennis Court Reconstruction GF - 500,000.00 One-time -
3 Dee Glen Tennis Court Reconstruction CIP 500,000.00 500,000.00 One-time -
4 New Sr. Warehouse Operator FTE GF - (18,750.00)Ongoing -
4 New Sr. Warehouse Operator FTE GF - 18,750.00 Ongoing 0.50
4 New Sr. Warehouse Operator FTE Golf - (18,750.00)Ongoing -
4 New Sr. Warehouse Operator FTE Golf - 18,750.00 Ongoing 0.50
5 Glendale Regional Park Phase 1 - Increased
Costs (from Impact Fees)CIP - 4,350,000.00 One-time -
6 Transfer CIP and Impact Fees to Finance GF - (223,299.00)Ongoing (2.00)
6 Transfer CIP and Impact Fees to Finance GF - 223,299.00 Ongoing 2.00
7 Forestry Division Director Reclassification
to Appointed (Grade 35)GF - - Ongoing -
8 Contract Development Specialists GF - 103,900.00 Ongoing 2.00
8 Contract Development Specialists IMS 5,000.00 5,000.00 One-time -
9 Lease & Tenant Improvement for
Substations GF - 130,000.00 Ongoing -
9 Lease & Tenant Improvement for
Substations GF - 678,462.00 One-time -
10 Fire Station Gender Equity GF - 750,000.00 One-time -
10 Fire Station Gender Equity CIP 750,000.00 750,000.00 One-time -
11 Real Property Purchase GF - 430,000.00 One-time -
11 Real Property Purchase CIP 430,000.00 430,000.00 One-time -
12
GO Bond - FTE Request - (2) Public Lands
Planner Positions, (1) PS Sr. Project
Manager
GF 194,600.00 310,600.00 Ongoing 3.00
12
GO Bond - FTE Request - (2) Public Lands
Planner Positions, (1) PS Sr. Project
Manager
Fleet 108,000.00 108,000.00 One-time -
12
GO Bond - FTE Request - (2) Public Lands
Planner Positions, (1) PS Sr. Project
Manager
IMS 8,000.00 8,000.00 One-time -
13 IMS / Airport Police Devices IMS - 155,029.00 One-time -
14 Patrol Response to Backfill Vacant Leave
Positions GF - 2,539,019.00 One-time -
FY 2023 Budget Amendment #4
Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed
Section A: New Items
1
FY 2023 Budget Amendment #4
1 Market Pay Adjustment - GF Transfer to
Golf GF - (25,700.00)Ongoing -
1 Market Pay Adjustment - GF Transfer to
Golf GF - 25,700.00 Ongoing -
1 Market Pay Adjustment - GF Transfer to
Golf Golf 25,700.00 46,800.00 Ongoing -
2 FY 2023 General Fund Funded Vehicle
Purchases Fleet 1,011,900.00 1,011,900.00 One-time -
3 FY 2022 Fleet Vehicle Purchases Fleet 90,000.00 One-time -
4 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 C
Federally Taxable CIP 24,240,000.00 24,240,000.00 One-time -
5 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 B
Non-Taxable Debt Service 244,846.05 244,846.05 One-time -
5 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 B
Non-Taxable CIP 42,553,000.00 42,553,000.00 One-time -
6 General Obligation Series 2022 Streets
Bonds CIP 23,494,957.90 23,494,957.90 One-time -
7 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 B & C Debt Service (3,196,573.00) (3,196,573.00)One-time -
7 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 B & C GF - (3,196,573.00)One-time -
8 FY 2022 Year End Fleet Encumbrance
Rollover to FY 2023 Fleet - 9,468,600.00 One-time -
9 IMS IMS 2,614,420.00 2,614,420.00 One-time -
10 Winter Shelter Overflow Patrol Resources -
Informational Only Misc Grant - - One-time -
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
1 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant FY
2023 Misc Grants 694,122.00 694,122.00 One-time -
2 Rehabilitation of High Hazard Potential
Dams (HHPD)Water 260,687.00 260,687.00 One-time -
3 ERAP 1 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 One-time -
4 Clean Neighborhood Teams Mitigation
Staffing - ARPA Funding Misc Grants 1,664,000.00 1,664,000.00 One-time -
-
Section D: Housekeeping
Section F: Donations
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
2
FY 2023 Budget Amendment #4
Consent Agenda #3
1
Utah Department of Health - Bureau of
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Grant,
FY23 Per Capita Allocation
Misc Grants 10,948.00 10,948.00 One-time -
Consent Agenda #4
1 SUGA Education & Traning Award,
SUGA Board of Directors
Misc Grants 30,000.00 30,000.00 One-time -
2 State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety
Office, 2023 Distracted Driving Prevention
Program
Misc Grants 17,000.00 17,000.00 One-time -
3 US Department of Justice, 2022 Bureau of
Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
Misc Grants 350,205.00 350,205.00 One-time -
4 US Department of Justice, Office on
Violence Against Women,
2020 YWCA Utah
Misc Grants 298,876.00 298,876.00 One-time -
Total of Budget Amendment Items 101,309,688.95 117,974,581.95 - - 6.00
Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
Total by Fund Class, Budget Amendment #4:
General Fund GF 194,600.00 2,774,764.00 - - 5.50
CIP Fund CIP 91,967,957.90 96,317,957.90 - - -
Golf Fund Golf 25,700.00 46,800.00 - - 0.50
Fleet Fund Fleet 1,119,900.00 10,678,500.00 - - -
Debt Service Fund Debt Service (2,951,726.95) (2,951,726.95) - - -
Water Fund Water 260,687.00 260,687.00 - - -
IMS Fund IMS 2,627,420.00 2,782,449.00 - - -
Miscellaneous Grant Fund Misc Grants 8,065,151.00 8,065,151.00 - - -
-
Total of Budget Amendment Items 101,309,688.95 117,974,581.95 - - 6.00
Administration Proposed Council Approved
Section I: Council Added Items
Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards
3
FY 2023 Budget Amendment #4
Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only
FY 2022-23 Budget, Including Budget Amendments
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue
General Fund (FC 10)425,537,408 100,000 6,000,000 194,600 431,832,008
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000
DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,762,560 1,762,560
Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 1,700,000
Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)4,302,222 4,302,222
Water Fund (FC 51)108,196,368 36,680,000 260,687 145,137,055
Sewer Fund (FC 52)196,630,907 196,630,907
Storm Water Fund (FC 53)13,476,733 13,476,733
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)302,268,600 - 302,268,600
Refuse Fund (FC 57)21,458,105 21,458,105
Golf Fund (FC 59)11,560,676 25,700 11,586,376
E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,925,000 3,925,000
Fleet Fund (FC 61)28,826,992 120,000 1,119,900 30,066,892
IMS Fund (FC 65)30,523,167 2,627,420 33,150,587
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for
Transportation (FC 69)9,600,000 9,600,000
CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)4,670,517 4,670,517
Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)34,158,918 2,749,584 2,517,995 8,065,151 47,491,648
Other Special Revenue (FC 73)300,000 300,000
Donation Fund (FC 77)2,920,250 20,000 44,668 2,984,918
Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)16,217,000 16,217,000
Debt Service Fund (FC 81)32,037,989 (2,951,727) 29,086,262
CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)35,460,387 6,603,019 5,267,217 91,967,958 139,298,581
Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,964,523 2,000,000 500,000 6,464,523
Risk Fund (FC 87)54,679,000 54,679,000
Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,344,180,322 11,592,603 - 51,009,880 101,309,689 - 1,508,092,494
4
FY 2023 Budget Amendment #4
Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only
FY 2022-23 Budget, Including Budget Amendments
Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense
General Fund (FC 10)425,537,408 847,540 6,538,000 2,774,764 435,697,712
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000
DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,762,560 1,762,560
Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 1,700,000
Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,757,825 5,757,825
Water Fund (FC 51)132,752,815 36,680,000 260,687 169,693,502
Sewer Fund (FC 52)255,914,580 255,914,580
Storm Water Fund (FC 53)18,699,722 18,699,722
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)384,681,671 688,818,000 1,073,499,671
Refuse Fund (FC 57)24,952,672 3,035,700 27,988,372
Golf Fund (FC 59)14,726,016 46,800 14,772,816
E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,800,385 3,800,385
Fleet Fund (FC 61)30,426,032 4,011,360 10,678,500 45,115,892
IMS Fund (FC 65)30,523,167 2,782,449 33,305,616
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for
Transportation (FC 69)9,458,748 9,458,748
CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)4,958,433 4,958,433
Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)26,614,153 2,749,584 2,517,995 8,065,151 39,946,883
Other Special Revenue (FC 73)300,000 300,000
Donation Fund (FC 77)287,250 20,000 44,668 351,918
Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)25,779,253 100,000 25,879,253
Debt Service Fund (FC 81)33,658,558 (2,951,727) 30,706,831
CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)35,460,387 11,713,917 12,267,217 96,317,958 155,759,479
Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,169,767 2,000,000 500,000 5,669,767
Risk Fund (FC 87)54,679,000 54,679,000
- Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,525,603,402 21,442,401 688,818,000 61,583,580 117,974,582 - 2,415,421,965
Budget Manager
Analyst, City Council
Contingent Appropriation
The Council adopted item A-2 at the September 20th Council meeting with the following contingency: "Each funding award to recommended housing developments will come to the Council for final approval."
5
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
1
Section A: New Items
A-1: Elections Awareness GF $38,509.00
Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Olivia Hoge
For questions please include: Olivia Hoge, Katie Lewis, Mary Beth Thompson
The cost of the election $24,735. The cost of the insert for the VIP is $13,774. Because the approved funding was given
before the resolution to hold a Special Election as well as include a mailer to be included in the GO Bond, we will need
additional funding. Including a mailer, the estimated cost is $38,509.
A-2: Repurpose Operation Rio Grande Funds for
Homelessness Services
GF $274,000.00
GF $177,847.00
GF $30,000.00
GF $9,000.00
Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner
For questions please include: Brent Beck, Tony Milner, Blake Thomas, Mary Beth Thompson
This amendment is to repurpose unused Salt Lake County funds for Operation Rio Grande through a contract
amendment with the County for new homelessness services. See attached County contract and contract
amendments.
$274,000: VOA, City Specific Outreach Team. Description: This funding will continue operations of the City’s outreach
team with Volunteers of America. This team is a vital piece of the City's response to unsheltered homelessness and
focuses on facilitating unsheltered residents access to both short term supportive services and long-term permanent
housing.
$177,847: Provider TBD, FY 2023 Winter Overflow Operations. Description: The Winter Overflow plan for this year,
while mandated by the State legislature, was not funded by the State legislature. While existing state funding has now
been identified to support the majority of overflow costs, this funding has been identified as a source that can fill gaps in
needed services for overflow operations this winter.
$30,000: Shelter the Homeless, HRC Security. Description: Funds would be used to pay for one of the swing shift
security staff at either the Geraldine E. King or the Gail Miller HRC.
$9,000: VOA, Detox Bed Costs. Description: Detox service costs increased this year and funding is needed to ensure
immediate access for the City’s first responders to refer patients into two detox beds at VOA’s adult detox center.
A-3: Dee Glen Tennis Court Reconstruction GF $500,000.00
CIP $500,000.00
Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Kristin Riker
For questions please include: Kristin Riker, Gregg Evans, Mary Beth Thompson
In 2020 after the March 18th earthquake, the North side of Court 7 at the Dee Glen Smith Tennis Center began to
significantly buckle and crack. The entire length of the edge of the court has deep cracks where the perimeter playing
surface has shifted and has become unsafe. Cables holding the post-tension courts have shifted and could continue to
shift more into the court with future weather or earthquake events.
The Engineering Division has been working with a structural engineer to determine the best co urse of action. The
structural engineer believes that based upon the transverse cracking and from preliminary observations , the drainage
from the court and from the hillside to the east and possibly from poor backfill, water may be causing the subsidence of
the perimeter beam. This is believed to be generating failure at the cable anchors and vertical saw cut of the old tennis
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
2
court slab. Failure of the post tensioning is also suspected to be causing the cracking and court slab failure. Repair to
the post tensioning is possible, however expensive, and likely temporary , and the contractor cannot guarantee the
quality and longevity of the repair.
This request for $500,000 will be to replace the post -tension courts with an anticipated cost of $360,000. Engineering
also suggests another $140,000 to address drainage and other issues that may have caused the failure.
A-4: New Sr. Warehouse Operator FTE GF -$18,750.00
GF $18,750.00
Golf -$18,750.00
Golf $18,750.00
Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Gregg Evans
For questions please includes: Kristin Riker, Matt Kammeyer, Gregg Evans, Mary Beth Thompson
With the creation of the new Public Lands Department we have identified a need to centralize purchasing, contracting,
and warehouse support functions to include the Golf Division in order to maintain better controls and efficiency. The
Golf Division has had several purchasing violations in the last year and the centralization of these functions will
standardize processes and controls to avoid future purchasing violations. The Public Lands Department is requesting to
reallocate existing seasonal budget from the General Fund and the Golf fund to share the cost 50/50 for (1) new FTE
Senior Warehouse Operator position.
This new position would potentially start January 1st 2023 utilizing existing savings for 6-months in FY23. Additional
funding would be requested to fund 50% of the position from the general fund for the full year in FY24.
The Public Lands warehouse staff currently provides purchasing, ordering, contracting, pa yment processing, and
warehouse inventory management for the entire Department. Over the last 24 months the warehouse staff workload
has increased as the department has taken on Special Events, Community Events, Park Ranger Program and added new
properties.
Additionally, the warehouse staff is very skilled and knowledgeable and has graciously provided services for other
departments to assist with their ordering and pricing needs.
The new Senior Warehouse Operator position would provide warehouse support to free up time for the current
warehouse staff to dedicate more time toward purchasing, ordering, and contracting functions for the Golf Division, the
other new programs and properties, and continue to assist other departments as needed.
A-5: Glendale Regional Park Phase 1–Increased
Costs
GF $4,350,000.00
CIP $4,350,000.00
Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Kat Maus
For questions please include: Kat Maus, Kristin Riker, Greg Evans, Mary Beth Thompson
Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment to increase the funding for Phase 1 design and construction of Glendale
Regional Park by $4,350,000 of impact fees. Phase 1 has previously been funded for $3.425 million in 2021, but
additional funds are now required to complete the phase. With increased costs and extensive, unforeseen circumstances
that have occurred with the demolition, Public Lands currently has only $1,750,000 remaining for construction to
complete Phase 1. In addition, construction costs have risen since the original allocation so Public Lands will be able to
deliver fewer amenities than what was originally expected.
In order to make a significant impact, to reduce phasing of the full park build-out, and to meet the requirements for the
Land and Water Conservation Funding, this additional request will be necessary to complete the currently proposed
Phase 1.
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
3
This funding request will include full design and implementation of Phase 1, Sustainable SITES Certification
(https://sustainablesites.org/certification-guide), all survey work needed for the phase and soft costs. Proposed Phase 1
amenities that could be constructed with this additional funding, including fees and soft costs, consist of:
- Multi-use sports court
- Pavilion
- Community Plaza
- Pathways
- Associated Parking
- Water-wise and ornamental plantings
- Playground with accessible design and assistive technologies for all ages
Without additional allocation of impact fees, Phase 1 will be significantly reduced. Public Lands will work with the
selected consultant to design to the current budget of the remaining $1.75 million, which could consist of elements
including a scaled-down playground, sports court, and plaza based on construction and material costs.
Timing of the issuance of the GO Bond necessitates the need for this funding in budget amendment #4.
A-6: Transfer CIP and Impact Fees to Finance GF -$223,299.00
GF $223,299.00
Department: CAN / Finance Prepared By: Blake Thomas
For questions please include: Blake Thomas, Tammy Hunsaker, Brent Beck, Mary Beth Thompson
This amendment will transfer CIP and Impact Fees functions from CAN to Finance, consisting of two FTE's and
operating budget. FTE's consist of the CIP Impact Fee Manager, grade 30, and a Capital Improvement Program
Specialist, grade 25. FTE annual budget of $210,394, annual operating budget of $12,905.
A-7: Forestry Division Dir. Reclassification to
Appointed (Grade 35)
GF $0.00
Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Gregg Evans
For questions please include: Kristin Riker, Gregg Evans, Mary Beth Thompson
Department of Public Lands is requesting an FY 2023 $0 housekeeping budget amendment to reclassify the current
Forestry Division Director to an appointed position (grade 35). Public Lands will utilize existing budget to fund this
request. HR has reviewed this change and has revised the appointed employees pay plan document as part of this
request. The Forestry Division Director has signed a letter acknowledging his understanding and acceptance of this
appointment and has been offered reasonable compensation to make the change.
The Urban Forestry Division Director is a crucial position that manages all aspects of the City's urban forest growth and
preservation needs. This position manages a multimillion dollar budget and team of skilled trade professionals that
provide individualized customer service to thousands of city residents every year. The position requires expertise in a
specialized biological science and the ability to apply and relate that knowledge to diverse city priorities and challenges.
Aside from working directly and regularly with numerous other City Departments and Divisions (including Public
Utilities, Building Services, Planning, Public Services and Engineering) on City projects and priorities, the Urban
Forestry Director must see to the delivery of professional grade productivity and quantifiable residential service.
The combination of skills, productivity and publicity attached to the Urban Forestry Division Director position should
merit a compensation class consistent with Division Directors throughout the City’s Public Services, Community &
Neighborhoods, and Public Lands Departments.
The City’s Revised Appointed Pay Plan is attached to the end of the amendment packet.
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
4
A-8: Contract Development Specialist GF $103,900.00
IMS 5,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson
For questions please include: Mary Beth Thompson, Christopher Jennings
The Department of Finance is requesting two Contract Development Specialist. Since 2021 the contract request s have
been growing at a steady rate. In 2023 we are experiencing a surge of contracts that we couldn't have predicted. As you
can see on the graph in FY 2020 we had 96 contracts, in 2021 we had 197 contracts, in 2022 we had 238 contracts, and
current today we have 93 contracts (see graph). Another example, June of 2022 had 44 contract requests come in and
this is more than double the norm for end of the fiscal year and the most we have ever had in one month. All of this
work needs to be done by writers on staff. This and the anticipation of becoming more active on city contract standards
and administration has completely overwhelm our staff at the current levels. Two Contract Development Specialist
positions are being requested accommodate the increased workload. These positions are a pay code 26 with budget for
6 months of salary plus an additional 26% for benefits.
96
197
238
93
FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
K requests
876
717
807
234
FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
PRs
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
5
A-9: Lease & Tenant Improvement for Substations GF $130,000.00
GF $678,462.00
Department: Public Serv / Police / CAN Prepared By: JP Goates / Tammy Hunsaker
For questions please include: JP Goates, Tammy Hunsaker, Brent Beck, Shellie Dietrich, Mary Beth
Thompson
The ongoing costs associated with this request- Substations rent/utilities/parking is estimated to be $125,000 for the
downtown substation and $5,000 for the N. Temple substation. This cost is only for 7 months (Dec to June). The
annual budget amount needed would be closer to $225,000.
The one-time costs associated with this request - All other costs are one-time and related to initial setup. They include
tenant improvement (TI) and office furniture of $513,208 for the downtown location and $125,254 for the N. Temple
location. See back up documentation for details. Additionally, the parking area is estimated at $40k which
covers costs, design, storm drain and landscaping.
A-10: Fire Station Gender Equity GF $750,000.00
CIP $750,000.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dustin Petersen
For questions please include: JP Goates, Dustin Petersen, Mary Beth Thompson
Historically, firefighting was a male-dominated profession. As a result, yesterday’s fire stations were built to
accommodate individuals of the same gender, traditions, and background. Most of the fire stations in Salt Lake C ity
were built in the late 80s and early 90s, with a few dating back as far as 1971. Today, the fire service is universally more
diverse, and are certainly more aware and respectful of coworkers’ needs for inclusion and well-being. Individuals of
different genders, gender identities, traditions, backgrounds, and perspectives work together to form the current
generation of firefighters. This emphasizes the need to accommodate many different individuals in one fire station. Any
firefighter or City employee should have a basic expectation of privacy and appropriate accommodations. We have made
efforts to address these expectations internally, with limited success given the original design of the facilities. Today, ou r
inability to permanently meet these standards places an unfair burden on all employees and can negatively impact
morale and workplace productivity. A fire station should reflect Salt Lake City’s priorities of equitable and inclusive
workspaces for all, and the Salt Lake City Fire Department has an obligation to promote and meet those goals and
objectives.
The proposed renovations to city facilities include modifying dorm rooms at fire stations 1,7, and 10. This work will
create adequate privacy by separating current dorm rooms with new walls and d oors. Station 8 will add additional
privacy by adding an additional bathroom and shower. Station 5 will require an additional dorm room with an adjacent
bathroom with shower.
A-11: Real Property Purchase GF $430,000.00
CIP $430,000.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: John Vuyk
For questions please include: JP Goates, Tammy Hunsaker Mary Beth Thompson, John Vuyk
The Administration is proposing the purchase of real property previously discussed in a closed session. Further
discussion about the purchase could be held in closed session if the Council desires. This is a key acquisition of real
property that will benefit the city and be utilized immediately with no additional budget impacts.
The proposed purchase would include a transfer from the general fund to the CIP fund for the purchase of the property.
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
6
A-12: GO Bond - FTE Request - (2) Public Lands
Planner Positions, (1) PS Sr. Project Manager
GF $310,600.00
Fleet $108,000.00
IMS $8,000.00
Departments: Public Lands, Public Services Prepared By: Dustin Petersen / Gregg Evans
For questions please include: Kristin Riker, Gregg Evans, Dustin Petersen, Jorge Chammoro, Mary
Beth Thompson
Full-time planning staff in the Public Lands Department are responsible for public engagement, design, consultant
management, cross-departmental coordination, and implementation tasks required to complete critical Public Lands
projects.
Existing project workloads and backlogs (approximately 70-80 funded yet incomplete projects) already necessitate
increased planning staff capacity. Significant increases in capital funding through the City Council -approved, $67.5
million Sales Tax Bond (August 2022) and the voter-approved, $85 million General Obligation (GO) Bond for Parks,
Trails, and Open Spaces (November 2022) have further cemented the need for and urgency of hiring additional
planners as quickly as possible.
As such, the Public Lands Department proposes hiring two (2) new full-time public lands project planners (pay grade
28, non-union) through Budget Amendment #4 (FY22/23). This would allow the Department to tackle existing backlog
and begin bond projects with more immediacy. Two more planners would grow the Department’s Planning Team to (5)
total FTEs.
The Sr. Project Manager will work within the Engineering Division and oversee a program dedicated solely to the
proposed bond projects. This position will be necessary for oversight of design and construction, overall. This would
include procurement of design and construction management, financial management, coordination with the Parks
Division engagement efforts and preliminary design leading to construction - along with other administrative functions
and coordination. This position will need to be a skilled engineer, landscap e architect or project management
professional with experience in large scale projects.
It is necessary to submit this request through a budget amendment rather than through next year’s FY23/24 annual
budget process due to the urgency and high expectation s that the City and the public have in regard to the initiation and
completion of critical public lands bond projects. Because the eight GO Bond projects will not all begin at the same time,
the Department will be able to further assess the need for additional planners and resources and include further
Planning Team staffing requests through the annual budget process. Due to fleet delays and materials shortages, this
request also includes an additional Public Lands vehicle that will allow the Planning Team to complete community
engagement and site visit tasks. It is included in the budget amendment in order to receive the vehicle as quickly as
possible (with 8-10 month lead times becoming more common in recent years).
Public Lands
One-time and annual costs for these two (2) additional FTEs include salaries, benefits, equipment and IMS Department
assistance, work spaces, and purchasing and maintaining one (1) compact fuel -efficient vehicle in the City’s fleet.
• The projected one-time cost for FY22/23 is $69,000 ($50,000 for Fleet, $4,000 for IMS and $15,000 for office
setup).
Fuel Costs for this fiscal year totaling $4,000 are also included.
• The projected annual ongoing cost is $231,400 (Salaries & fuel cost).
• The amendment proposes to add these new positions on January 29, 2023. The 5-month partial funding period
would cost $100,600 for the current fiscal year (FY22/23). Funding for personnel and ongoing costs will be added to the
Public Lands General Fund budget while funding for the vehicles and the IMS computer purchases will be transferred to
Fleet Fund and IMS Fund, respectively.
Public Services
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
7
One-time and annual costs for these one (1) additional FTEs include salaries, benefits, equipment and IMS Depa rtment
assistance, work spaces, and purchasing and maintaining one (1) compact fuel -efficient vehicle in the City’s fleet.
• The projected one-time cost for FY22/23 is $63,000 ($50,000 for Fleet, $4,000 for IMS and $9,000 for office
setup).
Fuel costs for this fiscal year totaling $4,000 are also included.
• The projected annual ongoing cost is $184,000 (Salaries & fuel cost).
• The amendment proposes to add these new positions on January 29, 2023. The 5-month partial funding period
would cost $83,000 for the current fiscal year (FY22/23). Funding for personnel and ongoing costs will be added to the
Public Lands General Fund budget while funding for the vehicles and the IMS computer purchases will be transferred to
Fleet Fund and IMS Fund, respectively.
A-13: IMS / Airport Police Devices IMS $155,029.00
Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony
For questions please include: Joseph Anthony, Aaron Bentley, Mary Beth Thompson
We are requesting 64 new devices to be used by the Police Officers for the Airport Division that was recently moved to
them.
There is a total of 66 officers currently serving at the airport. Two devices have recently been updated. We are therefore
requesting an additional 64 computers for the remaining officers.
Docks are not needed for each additional computer but will be set up as specific workstations where officers while not in
the field may sit for report writing or other administrative responsibilities. These will be hotel -style stations that will be
shared and be able to be used by any officer. We are requesting 10 docks for this purpose. The dock in the quote is not
the dock that will be used, but a standardized Thunderbolt 4 dock which is the new universal standard and will be
compatible with the next generation computers that come out. The last batch of docks we purchased at the price listed
below. We are also requesting a total of 13 car adapters for the airport vehicles.
These devices come with a standard 3-year warranty. They are also strong ruggedized devices. We are recommending
that we don't get the additional bumper-to-bumper warranty as shown on the initial quote. Our historical data shows
that the devices do not break at a cost greater than the increase in the bumper -to-bumper warranty. Therefore, we
recommend skipping the additional warranty at this time.
Price Quantity Total
Computer 2,350.93 64 150,459.52
Docks 284.00 10 2,840.00
Car Power Adapter 132.98 13 1,728.74
Total 155,028.26
A-14: Patrol Response to Backfill Vacant and Leave
Positions
GF $2,539,019.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich / Chief Brown
For questions please include: Shellie Dietrich, Chief Brown, Jordan Smith, Mary Beth Thompson
The Police Department is requesting funding for patrol response staffing to maintain staffing at a level that provides
safety in the community and helps to reduce call response times. Staffing levels continue to be strained and officer leave
of all types is directly impacting patrol staffing.
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
8
In September 2022, the Police Department added mandatory patrol shifts to cover shifts that are not currently staffed.
For the current trimester, the Department added 18 patrol shifts per day. This approach allows the Department to
proactively reduce crime and improve response times. Demand for patrol resources has steadily increased over the past
six years. Response times is a metric the Department is constantly striving to improve to help improve community
expectations. Salt Lake City is one of the fastest growing cities in the country.
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section D: Housekeeping
D-1: Market Pay Adjustment – GF Transfer to Golf GF -$25,700.00
GF $25,700.00
Golf $46,800.00
Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Kristin Riker
For questions please include: Kristin Riker, Gregg Evans, Matt Kammeyer, Mary Beth Thompson
The Golf Enterprise Fund did not receive the FY23 NFP & CCAC market pay adjustment revenues. The Public Lands
Department is requesting a housekeeping budget amendment to transfer a portion of general fund budget from Public
Lands to the Golf Fund to cover these costs and the remaining amount will come from the Golf Fund balance.
D-2: FY 2023 General Fund Funded Vehicle Purchases Fleet $1,011,900.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dustin Petersen
For questions please include: Dustin Petersen, Denise Sorensen, Dawn Valente, Julie Crookston, Mary
Beth Thompson
In Fiscal Year 2023 budget vehicles were added to the City's Fleet in the General Fund for new FTEs. However, Public
Services Fleet did not receive the budget for the transfer from the General Fund to the Fleet Fund, or the budget for the
related expenditures. This amendment will transfer funds to cover these purchases and provide the expenditure budget.
D-3: FY 2022 Fleet Vehicle Purchases Fleet $90,000.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dustin Petersen
For questions please include: Dustin Petersen, Denise Sorensen, Dawn Valente, Julie Crookston, Mary
Beth Thompson
Public Services Fleet requested rollover funds on FY 2023 Budget Amendment 1 item D4. There was a discrepancy in the
funding detail and Public Services Fleet requires $90,000 to order all vehicles.
D-4: Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 C Federally
Taxable CIP $24,240,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Brandon Bagley
For questions please include: Marina Scott, Brandon Bagley, Jared Jenkins, Mary Beth Thompson
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 C Federally Taxable, were sold in October 2022 for the purpose of
financing five projects. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the receipt of bond proceeds and the expenditure
budget to pay for construction of the five projects.
There will be five project cost centers in Fund 83 to which bond proceeds will be allocated. One cost center will receive
$6,100,000 for the Central Plant Electrical Transformer Upgrade & Emergency Backup Generators project. A second cost
center will receive $10,000,000 for the Pioneer Park Improvements project. A third cost center will receive $3,000,000
for the Fisher Mansion Stabilization & Improvements project. A fourth cost center will receive $2,000,000 for the Urban
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
9
Wood Reutilization Equipment and Storage Additions project. A fifth cost center will receive $3,000,000 for the Smith's
Ballpark Improvements project.
There will also be a unique cost center for the bond's cost of issuance. This cost center will receive $140,000.00
D-5: Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series
2022 B Non-Taxable
Debt Service $244,846.05
CIP $42,553,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Brandon Bagley
For questions please include: Marina Scott, Brandon Bagley, Jared Jenkins, Mary Beth Thompson
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 B Non-Taxable, were sold in October 2022 for the purpose of financing
five projects. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the receipt of bond proceeds and the expenditure budget to
pay for construction of the five projects.
There will be five project cost centers in Fund 83 to which bond proceeds will be allocated. One cost center will receive
$6,100,000 for the Westside Railroad Quiet Zone project. A second cost center will receive $8,000,000 for the Warm
Springs Punge Structure Stabilization & Improvements project. A third cost center will receive $11,200,000 for City
Cemetery Road Repairs / Reconstruction project. A fourth cost center will receive $9,753,000 for the 600 North Corridor
Transformation project. A fifth cost center will receive $7,500,000 for the Radio Towers project.
There will also be a unique cost center for the bond's cost of issuance. This cost center will receive $244,846.05.
D-6: General Obligation Series 2022
Streets Bonds
CIP $23,494,957.90
Department: Finance Prepared By: Brandon Bagley
For questions please include: Marina Scott, Brandon Bagley, Jared Jenkins, Mary Beth Thompson
In November 2018, voters authorized the issuance of up to $87 million in general obligation bonds to fund street
construction. The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022 were sold in September 2022 as the fourth and final issuance of
the authorization. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the receipt of bond proceeds and the expenditure
budget to pay for construction of the street projects associated with the bonds.
There will be eight project cost centers in Fund 83 to which bond proceeds will be allocated. The funding will be allocated
as shown below:
1. $3,000,0000 for the 1300 E (2100 S to the city limits) project.
2. $1,300,000 for Virginia Street (South Temple St to 11th Ave) project.
3. $2,000,000 for West Temple (South Temple St to 200 South).
4. $3,000,000 for local streets construction projects.
5. $1,500,000 for the 1700 East (900 S) (2100 South to 2700 South) project.
6. $8,000,000 for the 2100 South (700 East to 1300 East) project.
7. $2,000,000 for additional local streets construction projects.
8. $2,500,000 for 100 East / Highland Dr to augment prior funding.
There will also be a $194,957.90 allocation associated with the bond's cost of issuance.
D-7: Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series
2022 B & C
GF -$3,196,573.00
Debt Service -$3,196,573.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Brandon Bagley
For questions please include: Marina Scott, Brandon Bagley, Jared Jenkins, Mary Beth Thompson
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
10
The Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 B&C were issued in October 2022 for the purpose of financing several capital
projects throughout the City. The bonds were issued at a par amount of $64,225.000. The first interest payment is due
on April 1, 2023.
D-8: FY 2022 Year End Fleet
Encumbrance Rollover to FY 2023
Fleet $9,468,600.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dustin Petersen
For questions please include: Dustin Petersen, Denise Sorensen, Dawn Valente, Julie Crookston, Mary
Beth Thompson
Timing of vehicle and equipment orders tend to overlap the City's fiscal year cycle. Public Service Fleet has vehicles on
order with funding that was encumbered in FY 2022. This amendment will move encumbered funds to FY 2023.
D-9: FY 2022 Year End IMS
Encumbrance Rollover to FY 2023
IMS $2,614,420.00
Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony
For questions please include: Joseph Anthony, Aaron Bentley, Gloria Cortez, Mary Beth Thompson
IMS has encumbered money that was expected to be paid out of the FY22 funds and needs to be paid in FY23. These
encumbrances are listed in the Carry Over Encumbrance reports. All of these items have been approved for purchase by
central finance in a prior year. These expenses will be paid for by the annual allocation that IMS uses to collect it's revenue
on an annual basis.
D-10: Winter Shelter Overflow Patrol
Resources – Informational Only
GF $0.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich
For question please include: Shellie Dietrich, Jordan Smith, Mary Beth Thompson
The Police Department was awarded a grant for $400,000 for winter overflow shelter patrol for fiscal year 2022. The
Department used $21,410 of the funding in fiscal year 2022. The funding remains in place and the Administration is
notifying the Council of the intent to use the remaining $378,560 for additional patrol resources will be needed in the Rio
Grande area during the operational period of the 2022-2023 Winter Overflow Shelter. It is estimated the city’s downtown
population for homeless services will increase by approximately 350 people during the weekday and outside of the
shelters’ regular nighttime operating hours.
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
E-1: Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation
Grant FY 2023
Misc Grants $694,122.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Ann Garcia
For questions please include: Ann Garcia, Mary Beth Thompson
This budget amendment is to recognize the City's annual State of Utah Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant -
Amendment #1 for FY23 in the amount of $694,121.82 for the purpose of addressing homelessness and homelessness
related services in Salt Lake City.
This year the State changed the process for distributing funds from a competitive grant to a formula grant. Due to HB440
and the State's decision to flex-up, the City is now eligible for an additional amount of the State Homeless Cities
Mitigation funding to support the flex up (take-on additional shelter clients during the winter). However, as a result of a
decision by the Utah Homeless Council, SLC is required to pass 2/3 of this new mitigation funding through to a service
provider who is slated to provide winter overflow shelter and 1/3 may be used for City identified mitigation activities.
Housing Stability staff have reviewed winter overflow shelter budgets and propose that the required 2/3 be passed
through to Shelter the Homeless for overflow security and transportation, and the remaining 1/3 be directed to SLCPD for
camp mitigation overtime shifts.
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
11
E-2: Rehabilitation of High Hazard
Potential Dams (HHPD)
Water $260,687.00
Department: Public Utilities Prepared By: Ann Garcia
For questions please include: Ann Garcia, Lisa Tarufelli, Mary Beth Thompson
This budget amendment is to recognize the City's funding availability grant award in the amount of $260,687 for the
purpose of planning and design for the rehabilitation of Lake Mary-Phoebe in Salt Lake City.
The State of Utah, Division of Water Resources secured the funding from the Department of Homeland Security. The
grant can be used to fund 65% of planning and design work.
No new FTEs.
Public Utilities hads discussed potential projects on the Lak e Mary Dam internally and with Utah Dam Safety Program.
The intend was to budget work for Fiscal Year 2024. Given the available funding opportunity, Public Utilities has
determined the schedule will be accelerated and initiate the evaluation and design t o take advantage of the grant. Public
Utilities has identified and will commit funding to mat the remaining 35% or $130,344 of the project.
We need to put a hold on this funding until an award agreement is received. We have received an email announcing t he
award.
E-3: ERAP 1 Reallocated Funds Misc Grants $5,000,000.00
Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner
For questions please include: Tony Milner, Brent Beck, Ann Garcia, Mary Beth Thompson
The Treasury has reallocated unspent Emergency Rent Assistance Program (ERAP) 1 funds set-aside for the State of Utah
by low-performing cities and made these funds available to apply for by high-performing cities, such as Salt Lake City.
To administer Salt Lake City’s initial ERAP 1 award, the City contrac ted with the State of Utah, Department of Workforce
Services’ (DWS) online Utah Rent Relief application portal, https://rentrelief.utah.gov/.
Coordinating with DWS, Housing Stability staff have determined that Salt Lake City could apply for $5,000,000 in
reallocated ERAP 1. These funds will further assist Salt Lake City residents with deposit, rent, utilities, rent arrears, and
utility arrears, again utilizing the Utah Rent Relief application portal.
Note: This new request is separate from, and does not affect, the City’s other Treasury ERAP 1 ($6,067,033), ERAP 1
Reallocated ($3,000,000), and ERAP 2 ($4,800,559.40) awards.
See attached funding memos and award email from Treasury.
E-4: Clean Neighborhood Teams
Mitigation Staffing – ARPA Funding
Misc Grants $1,664,000.00 $1,664,000.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich / Chief Brown
For questions please include: Shellie Dietrich, Chief Brown, Jordan Smith, Mary Beth Thompson
The Administration is requesting $1,664,000 of funding, to provide funding for Clean Neighborhoods Teams for the
Police Department to provide staffing to support the homeless encampment cle anup and camp re-establishment
stabilization as requested by the Salt Lake County Health Department. Police officers working extra overtime shifts will
provide security to ensure the cleanups can proceed in an environment that will be safe for all involved . Staffing numbers
will vary depending on the size, number of cleanups and the location.
Section F: Donations
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
12
Section G: Consent Agenda
Consent Agenda #3
G-1: Utah Department of Health - Bureau of
Emergency Medical Services (EMS)grant, FY23 Per
Capita Allocation
Misc Grants
$10,948.00
Department: Fire
Department
Prepared By: Brittany Blair/Ann Garcia
The Fire Department applied for and was awarded $10,948 of grant funding from the Utah Department of Health, Bureau
of Emergency Medical Services. This funding will be used towards the purchase of medical equipment relating to the
provision of Emergency Medical Services as funding permits.
A Public Hearing was held on 4-5-22 for the grant application on this award.
Consent Agenda #4
G-1: SUGA Education & Traning Award, SUGA Board
of Directors
Misc Grants $30,000.00
Department: IMS Prepared By: Blake Scott / Ann Garcia
The City has requested funds to help implement Workday across departments with Train the Trainer education as well as
additional aids including a training video. Each department has identified individuals who will assist their co -workers in
learning about Workday and how to use it. The training will take place between November 2022 and April 2023.
SUGA is a non-profit whose mission is to provide assistance for furthering the education of software users in the public
sector.
No match is required.
A public hearing was held for this grant application on 08/16/2022
G-2: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office,
2023 Distracted Driving Prevention Program
Misc Grants $17,000.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Ann Garcia
The Police Department applied for $14,175 and received a $17,000 grant from the Utah Highway Safety Office for the
2023 Distracted Driving Prevention Program.
The grant funding for 54 distracted driving enforcement/education overtime shifts.
A Public Hearing was held on 05/03/2022 for the grant application on this award.
G-3: US Department of Justice, 2022 Bureau of
Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
Misc Grants $350,205.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Ann Garcia
The police department applied for and received a grant award from the U.S. Department of Justice under the 2022
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) program. The total grant award is $350,205.00.
The police department will use its award to provide training for sworn and civilian personnel, E-bikes (+accessories),
Ballistic Helmets, Ballistic Computers, Rifle Shields, Public Relations Unit Supplies, Community Policing and Targeted
Enforcement Overtime, Vehicle Telmatics Software and Training, Promising Youth Project Supplies and Training,
Community Surveys, and 2 sub-awards to Salt Lake County (BJA allocations) and Unified Police Department (BJA
allocations).
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
13
No Match is required.
A Public Hearing was held on 10/4/22 for the grant applica tion on this award.
G-4: US Department of Justice, Office on Violence
Against Women,
2020 YWCA Utah
Misc Grants $298,876.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Ann Garcia
The police department applied for and received a grant award from the YWCA from pass-through funds from U.S.
Department of Justice under the 2020 grants to Improving Criminal Justice Responses to Sexual Assault, Domestic
Violence, Dating Violence and Stalking program. The total grant award is $298,876.00.
Salt Lake City signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the YWCA to participate as a sub awardee on the project. The
grant will fund three part-time civilian positions including two victim advocates and one civilian specialist to investigate
cases involving restricted persons accessing firearms. It will also fund supplies for both positions. The grant will fund
overtime to conduct operations to pursue protective order violations and outstanding domestic violence warrants. Lastly,
it will fund travel training to send Domestic Violence Unit and Victim Advocate Program staff to a professional training
conference.
No Match is required.
A Public Hearing was held on 04/21/2020 for the grant application on this award.
Section I: Council Added Items
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
14
Attachments
Initiative A-2 Attachment
County Contract No. AL17504C
DA Matter 22CIV001228
AMENDMENT NO. 2
to
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
between
SALT LAKE COUNTY
and
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
THIS AMENDMENT is executed this __ day of September 2022, by and between SALT
LAKE COUNTY (the "County"), a body corporate and politic of the State of Utah, on behalf of
its Behavioral Health Division, and SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Utah municipal
corporation, ("City"). County and City are collectively referred to hereafter as the "Parties."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on November 13, 2017, the Parties entered into an Agreement (County
Contract No. AL17504C ("Agreement")) in which City agreed to provide the County with funds
in exchange for County reserving treatment and detox beds for City's residents in need of such
services; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Amendment 1, the Parties agreed the County should return the
unspent funds the City provided to the County in the Agreement.
WHEREAS, the County returned Four Hundred Ninety Thousand Eight Hundred Forty-Seven dollars
($490,847.00) of unspent funds (“Unspent Funds”) to the City.
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to define the manner in which the City will spend the Unspent Funds and
to extend the time frame for the City to use the Unspent Funds.
THEREFORE, in exchange for valuable consideration, including the mutual covenants and
agreements contained in the Agreement, Amendment 1 and this Amendment, the Parties covenant
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
15
and agree as follows:
1. Paragraph 1.f. of the Agreement and Amendment 1 shall be amended as follows:
f. City shall use the Unspent Funds as follows:
(1) VOA, City Specific Outreach, Outreach Team, $274,000;
(2) Provider TBD, FY23 Winter Overflow Operations, $177,847;
(3) Shelter the Homeless, HRC Security, $30,000; and
(4) VOA, Detox Bed Costs, $9,000.
The City shall report to the County when the remaining Unspent Funds have been fully spent, or by
June 30, 2023, whichever comes first.
2. Paragraph 5 of the Agreement and Amendment 1 shall be amended as follows:
5. The Agreement shall terminate when the City spends the remaining Unspent F unds as described
in Paragraph 1.f. of this Amendment. If the City does not spend the remaining Unspent Funds by June 30,
2023, the Parties may amend this Agreement to extend the deadline for the City to spend the remaining
Unspent Funds.
3. All other terms and conditions of the underlying Agreement and Amendment 1
not specifically amended herein shall remain in full force and effect.
[signature page to follow]
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
16
Initiative A-7 Attachments
APPENDIX B – APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY
DEPARTMENT
Effective June 26, 2022
(revised October 24, 2022)
911 BUREAU Job Title Grade
911 DISPATCH DIRECTOR 041X
911 COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 032X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
AIRPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF AIRPORTS 041X
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, AIRPORT 040X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT ENGINEERING 039X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT MAINTENANCE 039X
DIRECTOR FINANCE/ACCOUNTING AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION/COMMERCIAL
SERVICES
039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT PLANNING & CAPITAL PROJECTS 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS - AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONAL READINESS & TRANSITION 039X
DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING 038X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ATTORNEY 041X
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY 040X
CITY RECORDER 034X
CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL MEMBER-ELECT N/A*
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL OFFICE 041X
COUNCIL LEGAL DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - CITY COUNCIL 039X
ASSOCIATE DEPUTY DIRECTOR COUNCIL 037X
LEGISLATIVE & POLICY MANAGER 037X
SENIOR ADVISOR CITY COUNCIL 037X
SENIOR PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 033X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL 031X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST III 031X
COMMUNITY FACILITATOR 031X
OPERATIONS MANAGER & MENTOR – CITY COUNCIL 031X
PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 031X
POLICY ANALYST/PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 028X
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
17
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST II 028X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON/POLICY ANALYST 027X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON 026X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST I 026X
ASSISTANT TO THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 025X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT/AGENDA 024X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 021X
COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 037X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY SERVICES 037X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (ENGINEER) 037X
PLANNING DIRECTOR 037X
BUILDING OFFICIAL 035X
DIRECTOR OF HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT 035X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (PLANNER) 035X
YOUTH & FAMILY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 037X
ARTS DIVISION DIRECTOR 032X
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DIRECTOR 032X
FINANCE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 041X
CITY TREASURER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 039X
CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER 036X
FIRE
FIRE CHIEF 041X
DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 037X
ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
HUMAN RESOURCES
CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 041X
DEPUTY CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 037X
CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD INVESTIGATOR 035X
TRANSITION CHIEF OF STAFF 041X*
TRANSITION COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X*
TRANSITION EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X*
INFORMATION MGT SERVICES
CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 041X
CHIEF INNOVATIONS OFFICER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 039X
JUSTICE COURTS
JUSTICE COURT JUDGE 037X
CITY COURTS ADMINISTRATOR 036X
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
18
MAYOR
CHIEF OF STAFF 041X
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 041X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF 039X
SENIOR ADVISOR 039X
COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 030X
POLICY ADVISOR 029X
REP COMMISSION POLICY ADVISOR 029X
COMMUNITY LIAISON 026X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
OFFICE MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 024X
COMMUNITY OUTREACH - EQUITY & SPECIAL PROJECTS
COORDINATOR 024X
COMMUNICATION AND CONTENT MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 021X
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 019X
CONSUMER PROTECTION ANALYST 016X
POLICE
CHIEF OF POLICE 041X
ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF POLICE 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - COMMUNICATIONS 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - INTERNAL AFFAIRS 037X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
PUBLIC LANDS
PUBLIC LANDS DIRECTOR 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PUBLIC LANDS 037X
GOLF DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PARKS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
URBAN FORESTRY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PUBLIC SERVICES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES 041X
CITY ENGINEER 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS 038X
FACILITIES DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
FLEET DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
STREETS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
COMPLIANCE DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
PUBLIC UTILITIES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
CHIEF ENGINEER - PUBLIC UTILITIES 037X
WATER QUALITY & TREATMENT ADMINSTRATOR 037X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
19
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 037X
SUSTAINABILITY
SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTOR 041X
SUSTAINABILITY DEPUTY DIRECTOR 037X
WASTE & RECYCLING DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed
position on this pay plan may be added, removed or modified without approval of
the City Council.
* Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member-elect, is set as provided
under Chapter
2.03.030 of the Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent
to those provided to full- time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council
members-elect are also equivalent to those provided to full-time employees.
APPENDIX B – APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY
DEPARTMENT
Effective June
26, 2022 (revised
October 24, 2022)
911 BUREAU Job Title Grade
911 DISPATCH DIRECTOR 041X
911 COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 032X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
AIRPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF AIRPORTS 041X
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, AIRPORT 040X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT ENGINEERING 039X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT MAINTENANCE 039X
DIRECTOR FINANCE/ACCOUNTING AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION/COMMERCIAL
SERVICES
039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT PLANNING & CAPITAL PROJECTS 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS - AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONAL READINESS & TRANSITION 039X
DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING 038X
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
20
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ATTORNEY 041X
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY 040X
CITY RECORDER 034X
CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL MEMBER-ELECT N/A*
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL OFFICE 041X
COUNCIL LEGAL DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - CITY COUNCIL 039X
ASSOCIATE DEPUTY DIRECTOR COUNCIL 037X
LEGISLATIVE & POLICY MANAGER 037X
SENIOR ADVISOR CITY COUNCIL 037X
SENIOR PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 033X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL 031X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST III 031X
COMMUNITY FACILITATOR 031X
OPERATIONS MANAGER & MENTOR – CITY COUNCIL 031X
PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 031X
POLICY ANALYST/PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 028X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST II 028X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON/POLICY ANALYST 027X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON 026X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST I 026X
ASSISTANT TO THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 025X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT/AGENDA 024X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 021X
COMMUNITY &
NEIGHBORHOODS
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 037X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY SERVICES 037X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (ENGINEER) 037X
PLANNING DIRECTOR 037X
BUILDING OFFICIAL 035X
DIRECTOR OF HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT 035X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (PLANNER) 035X
YOUTH & FAMILY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 037X
ARTS DIVISION DIRECTOR 032X
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DIRECTOR 032X
FINANCE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 041X
CITY TREASURER 039X
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
21
DEPUTY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 039X
CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER 036X
FIRE
FIRE CHIEF 041X
DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 037X
ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
HUMAN RESOURCES
CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 041X
DEPUTY CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 037X
CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD INVESTIGATOR 035X
TRANSITION CHIEF OF STAFF 041X*
TRANSITION COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X*
TRANSITION EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X*
INFORMATION MGT
SERVICES
CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 041X
CHIEF INNOVATIONS OFFICER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 039X
JUSTICE COURTS
JUSTICE COURT JUDGE 037X
CITY COURTS ADMINISTRATOR 036X
MAYOR
CHIEF OF STAFF 041X
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 041X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF 039X
SENIOR ADVISOR 039X
COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 030X
POLICY ADVISOR 029X
REP COMMISSION POLICY ADVISOR 029X
COMMUNITY LIAISON 026X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
OFFICE MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 024X
COMMUNITY OUTREACH - EQUITY & SPECIAL PROJECTS
COORDINATOR 024X
COMMUNICATION AND CONTENT MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 021X
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 019X
CONSUMER PROTECTION ANALYST 016X
POL ICE
CHIEF OF POLICE 041X
ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF POLICE 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - COMMUNICATIONS 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - INTERNAL AFFAIRS 037X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
22
PUBLIC LANDS
PUBLIC LANDS DIRECTOR 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PUBLIC LANDS 037X
GOLF DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PARKS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
URBAN FORESTRY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
P UBLIC SERVICES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES 041X
CITY ENGINEER 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS 038X
FACILITIES DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
FLEET DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
STREETS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
COMPLIANCE DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
PUBLIC UTILITIES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
CHIEF ENGINEER - PUBLIC UTILITIES 037X
WATER QUALITY & TREATMENT ADMINSTRATOR 037X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 037X
SUSTAINABILITY
SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTOR 041X
SUSTAINABILITY DEPUTY DIRECTOR 037X
WASTE & RECYCLING DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed
position on this pay plan may be added, removed or modified without approval of
the City Council.
* Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member-elect, is set as provided
under Chapter
2.03.030 of the Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent
to those provided to full- time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council
members-elect are also equivalent to those provided to full-time employees.
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
23
Initiative A-9 Attachments
Downtown
Regent Area/Count Unit Cost Total
Ballistic Film 837 $ 250.00 $ 209,250.00
Window decals 5 $ 538.00 $ 2,690.00
Reception Glass and Kevlar 100 $ 250.00 $ 25,000.00
Paint 200 $ 4.00 $ 800.00
Key card access x4 4 $ 5,000.00 $ 20,000.00
Buzz in access point 1 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
New keyed locks 12 $ 250.00 $ 3,000.00
New security door install w/wall x2 2 $ 25,000.00 $ 50,000.00
Frame sheet paint 10 $ 900.00 $ 9,000.00
Couch and chairs lobby coffee 1 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00
Cubes 6 $ 3,000.00 $ 18,000.00
Community Conference table 8' 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00
Conferece chairs 10 $ 200.00 $ 2,000.00
Office desks and chairs 5 $ 3,000.00 $ 15,000.00
Office chairs 10 $ 200.00 $ 2,000.00
Break room table 1 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
Break chairs 4 $ 200.00 $ 800.00
Briefing room folding chairs 20 $ 100.00 $ 2,000.00
Bicycle racks 3 $ 250.00 $ 750.00
Line of sight wiring 1 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00
Internet 1 $ 900.00 $ 900.00
Sum Total $ 371,890.00
Contruction Overhead, Permits, Fees, PM, Engr. 28% $ 104,129.20
Contingency 10% $ 37,189.00
$ 513,208.20
North Temple
North Temple Area/Count Unit Cost Total
Ballistic Film 198 $ 250.00 $ 49,500.00
Decals 3 $ 538.00 $ 1,614.00
Paint $ 4.00 $ -
Key card access x2 2 $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00
Buzz in access 1 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
Fire alarm strobes and other $ 7,000.00 $ -
Storefront door 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00
Hall frame, sheet, paint $ 900.00 $ -
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
24
Reception desk 90 deg $ 3,800.00 $ -
Lobby round table 6' 1 $ 750.00 $ 750.00
Conference table 4' $ 500.00 $ -
Conferece chairs 4 $ 200.00 $ 800.00
Office desks and shelves $ 5,000.00 $ -
Office chairs 2 $ 200.00 $ 400.00
Refridgerator 1 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
Break chairs 2 $ 200.00 $ 400.00
Microwave 1 $ 300.00 $ 300.00
Line of sight wiring? 1 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00
Internet 1 $ 900.00 $ 900.00
Bicycle racks 3 $ 250.00 $ 750.00
Sum Total $ 90,764.00
Permits, Fees, PM, Engr. 28% $ 25,413.92
Contingency 10% $ 9,076.40
$ 125,254.32
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
25
Initiative E-3 Attachments
MEMORANDUM
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
HOUSING STABILTY DIVISION
To: Tony Milner, Heather Royall, Tyler Durfee, Alex Lundy
From: Erik Fronberg
Subject: ERA1 Second Reallocation ($5,000,000)
Date: October 27, 2022
SUMMARY
The State of Utah voluntarily reallocated $5,000,000 in ERA1 funds to Salt Lake City for Direct
Household Assistance in the form of rent and utility payments to Salt Lake City residents through
the Utah Rent Relief portal (https://rentrelief.utah.gov). The Department of Workforce Services
(DWS) has requested that 10% of the funding be set aside to reimburse the agency for administrative
costs.
$ 4,500,000 for Direct Household Assistance (Cost Center 7262150)
$ 500,000 for Community Partner Administrative Costs (Cost Center 7262152)
DETAILS
On September 23, 2022, DWS informed Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County that Utah was likely to lose
$15,000,000 in Treasury ERA1 funds by the end of September 2022 unless they reallocated the funds to other
Utah ERA recipient jurisdictions. Reallocation would then have a spenddown date of December 31, 2022. Salt
Lake City committed to receiving $5,000,000 of this funding and Salt Lake County committed to receiving the
remaining $10,000,000.
Salt Lake City submitted a request to the Treasury to receive the $5,000,000 reallocation on September 26,
2022. On October 18, 2022, the Treasury approved the City’s request without confirming the approved amount.
On October 27, 2022, The Treasury released a payment of the full
$5,000,000 and noted that the request was approved in full. These funds bring the City’s total Treasury ERA1
award to $14,067,033.20. These funds are separate from, and do not affect, the City’s ERA2 award ($4,800,559.
40) and ERA2 reallocation ($4,000,000).
To administer Salt Lake City’ s ERA awards, the City continues to contract with DWS to utilize the online
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
26
Utah Rent Relief application portal at https://rentrelief.utah.gov/. DWS has requested that the City set aside the
full 10% allowed for administrative costs for reimbursing the agency for costs related to operating the portal
and issuing payments to eligible City residents. Existing City Admin dollars sufficiently cover inhouse
administrative costs.
Applicable ERA1 Cost Centers:
Cost Center Name Addition from ERA1 Second Reallocation
7262150 US Treasury ERA1 Rent Assist $ 4,500,000
7262152 US Treasury ERA1 Hsg Stabili $ 500,000
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
27
From: Fronberg, Erik
To: Milner, Tony; Lundy, Alexander; Durfee, Tyler; Royall, Heather
Cc: Swanson, Suzanne
Subject: RE: (EXTERNAL) ERA1 Reallocation Disbursement Date: Thursday,
October 27, 2022 4:22:40 PM Attachments: ERA1 Second Reallocation Memo.pdf
Hi all!
I’ve attached a memo outlining the $5,000,000 ERA1 second reallocation. DWS has asked us to set aside the
full 10% available for administrative costs to cover the expenses associated with issuing payments on the
City’s behalf bringing the allocations to:
$4,500,000 for Direct Household Assistance (Cost Center 7262150)
$500,000 for Community Partners Administrative Costs (Cost Center 7262152) Please let
me know if you have any questions!
Best, Erik
ERIK FRONBERG
Community Development Grants Specialist Housing Stability
Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7291
EMAIL erik.fronberg@slcgov.com
https://www.slc.gov/housingstability/
From: Fronberg, Erik
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 12:03 PM
To: Milner, Tony <Tony.Milner@slcgov.com>; Lundy, Alexander <Alexander.Lundy@slcgov.com>; Durfee,
Tyler <Tyler.Durfee@slcgov.com>; Royall, Heather <Heather.Royall@slcgov.com>
Cc: Swanson, Suzanne <Suzanne.Swanson@slcgov.com>
Subject: FW: (EXTERNAL) ERA1 Reallocation Disbursement
Okay, looks like our confirmation from Treasury came through. I have a meeting with DWS this afternoon
Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment #4
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
28
where I’ll determine how much of this needs to be set aside for their admin vs. direct household assistance
and will get it out as soon as possible for a budget amendment.
ERIK FRONBERG
Community Development Grants Specialist Housing Stability
Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7291
EMAIL erik.fronberg@slcgov.com
https://www.slc.gov/housingstability/
From: EmergencyRentalAssistance@treasury.gov <emergencyrentalassistance@treasury.gov>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 12:00 PM
To: Fronberg, Erik <erik.fronberg@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) ERA1 Reallocation Disbursement
Treasury released a payment of $5,000,000.00 via ACH on 10/27/2022. This comprises the approved amount
of reallocated funding.
Please ensure your financial staff is aware of the incoming funds referenced above. Thank you,
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA1) program
Impact Fees ‐ Summary Confidential
Data pulled 07/01/2022
Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area
Area Cost Center UnAllocated
Cash Notes:
Impact fee - Police 8484001 846,150$ A
Impact fee - Fire 8484002 1,156,234$ B
Impact fee - Parks 8484003 15,216,578$ C
Impact fee - Streets 8484005 8,061,854$ D
25,280,816$
Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month
202107 (Jul2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202108 (Aug2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202109 (Sep2021)2022Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202110 (Oct2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202111 (Nov2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202112 (Dec2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202201 (Jan2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202202 (Feb2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202203 (Mar2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202204 (Apr2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202205 (May2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Current Month
202206 (Jun2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202207 (Jul2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202208 (Aug2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202209 (Sep2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202210 (Oct2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202211 (Nov2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202212 (Dec2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202301 (Jan2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202302 (Feb2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202303 (Mar2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202304 (Apr2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202305 (May2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202306 (Jun2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202307 (Jul2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202308 (Aug2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202309 (Sep2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202310 (Oct2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202311 (Nov2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202312 (Dec2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202401 (Jan2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202402 (Feb2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202403 (Mar2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202404 (Apr2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202405 (May2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202406 (Jun2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Total, Currently Expiring through June 2024 0$ -$ -$ -$ 0$
Fiscal
Quarter
E = A + B + C + D
Police Fire Parks Streets
Total
FY
2
0
2
3
Calendar
Month
FY
2
0
2
2
FY
2
0
2
4
Impact Fees Confidential
Data pulled 07/01/2022 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC
Police
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Police Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Police Allocation
Encumbrances Sum of Police Allocation YTD Expenditures
Sum of Police Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
ReimbExcessPoliceCapacity IF 8422800 1,898,497$ -$ 1,898,497$ -$
Police'sConsultant'sContract 8419205 3,565$ -$ 3,565$ -$
Public Safety Building Replcmn 8405005 14,068$ 14,068$ -$ 0$
Eastside Precint 8419201 21,639$ -$ -$ 21,639$
Police Impact Fee Refunds 8421102 338,448$ -$ 100,842$ 237,606.45$
Grand Total 2,276,217$ 14,068$ 2,002,903$ 259,246$
A
Fire
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Fire Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Fire Allocation
Encumbrances Sum of Fire Allocation YTD Expenditures
Sum of Fire Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 4,941$ 3,021$ 1,862$ 58$
FY20 FireTrainingFac. 8420431 56,031$ -$ -$ 56,031$
Fire Station #3 Debt Service 8422200 483,233$ -$ 483,233$ -$
Grand Total 1,045,105$ 3,021$ 985,995$ 56,089$
B
Parks Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
AppropriationValues
Description Cost Center
Sum of Parks Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Parks Allocation
Encumbrances Sum of Parks Allocation YTD Expenditures
Sum of Parks Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
Cnty #2 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420426 88$ -$ 88$ -$
Warm Springs Off Leash 8420132 20,411$ -$ 20,411$ -$
Fairmont Park Lighting Impr 8418004 49,752$ -$ 49,752$ -$
Fisher Carriage House 8420130 1,098,764$ 261,187$ 837,577$ -$
Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 4,857$ 2,596$ 2,219$ 42$
Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 23,530$ 23,000$ -$ 530$
Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,110$ -$ -$ 1,110$
Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$
Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 224,247$ 92,027$ 130,574$ 1,646$
Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$
ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 10,830$ -$ 4,433$ 6,398$
FY Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 12,795$ 4,328$ -$ 8,467$
Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$
9line park 8416005 21,958$ 855$ 2,692$ 18,411$
IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 58,014$ -$ 1,905$ 56,109$
UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 135,084$ 21,169$ 12,803$ 101,112$
Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 523,889$ 374,573$ 39,040$ 110,276$
FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 722,920$ 116,388$ 480,599$ 125,933$ C
Three Creeks West Bank NewPark 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$
9Line Orchard 8420136 195,045$ 12,423$ 28,477$ 154,145$
RAC Playground with ShadeSails 8422415 180,032$ -$ -$ 180,032$
Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 388,477$ 16,762$ 117,939$ 253,777$
Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 275,000$ -$ -$ 275,000$
Bridge to Backman 8418005 290,276$ 10,285$ 4,515$ 275,475$
SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 425,000$ -$ 105,861$ 319,139$
Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$
Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 431,000$ 24,953$ -$ 406,047$
Historic Renovation AllenParK 8422410 420,000$ -$ -$ 420,000$
Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 489,688$ 29,235$ 35,098$ 425,355$
Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 510,000$ 44,362$ -$ 465,638$
Green loop 200 E Design 8422408 610,000$ -$ -$ 610,000$
Emigration Open Space ACQ 8422423 700,000$ -$ -$ 700,000$
Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,094,430$ 33,364$ 47,318$ 1,013,749$
SLCFoothillsTrailheadDevelpmnt 8422412 1,304,682$ -$ -$ 1,304,682$
Pioneer Park 8419150 3,343,904$ 86,260$ 179,148$ 3,078,497$
GlendaleWtrprk MstrPln&Rehab 8422406 3,200,000$ 17,400$ 22,152$ 3,160,449$
Grand Total 17,281,123$ 1,174,504$ 2,142,322$ 13,964,297$
Streets
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Street Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Street Allocation
Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YTD Expenditures
Sum of Street Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 152,500$ 68,924$ 83,576$ -$
700 South Reconstruction 8415004 2,449$ -$ 2,449$ -$
Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ 13,000$ -$ -$
Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 95,653$ 12,768$ 82,180$ 705$
Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 1,444$ -$ -$ 1,444$
Gladiola Street 8406001 16,109$ 13,865$ -$ 2,244$
Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$
Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$
500 to 700 S 8418016 96,637$ -$ 73,893$ 22,744$
Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 25,398$ -$ -$ 25,398$
900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 28,000$ -$ -$ 28,000$
Transportatn Safety Imprvmt IF 8422620 44,400$ 13,090$ -$ 31,310$ D
1700S Corridor Transfrmtn IF 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$
Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 35,392$ -$ -$ 35,392$
200S TransitCmpltStrtSuppl IF 8422602 37,422$ -$ -$ 37,422$
Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 58,780$ 20,697$ -$ 38,083$
1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$
Local Link Construction IF 8422606 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$
400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 90,000$ -$ -$ 90,000$
Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$
Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$
Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 200,000$ -$ 18,154$ 181,846$
TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 302,053$ 53,713$ 9,608$ 238,732$
Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 2,250,220$ 396,873$ 1,470,038$ 383,309$
IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8419008 221,688$ -$ 221,238$ 450$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8420105 300,000$ 77,706$ 222,294$ -$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 875,000$ 67,474$ 19,589$ 787,937$
Grand Total 5,967,404$ 840,578$ 2,220,710$ 2,906,116$
Total 26,566,261$ 2,032,171$ 7,348,343$ 17,185,748$
E = A + B + C + D
TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE
$1,156,234
UnAllocated
Budget
Amount
8484001
846,150$
25,280,816$
8484002
8484003
8484005
15,216,578$
8,061,854$
Item C2
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY23
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards
Budget Analysts
DATE:December 13, 2022 UPDATED 6:40PM
RE: Budget Amendment Number Four FY2023
MOTION 1 – ADOPT ALL ITEMS EXCEPT NEW FULL TIME EMPLOYEE POSITIONS
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2023 final budget of Salt Lake City
for items only as shown on the motion sheet.
Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the individual items being approved below; they are
listed for reference. See Motions two through five on the next page for the proposed new positions.
A-1: Elections Awareness ($38,509 from General Fund Balance)
A-2: Rescope Unspent Operation Rio Grande Funds for Homelessness Services ($490,847 from General
Fund Balance)
A-3: Dee Glen Tennis Court Reconstruction ($500,000 from General Fund Balance)
A-5: Glendale Regional Park Phase One ($4.35 Million from Parks Impact Fees)
A-6: Transfer CIP and Impact Fee Functions and Two FTEs from CAN to Finance ($223,299)
A-7: Urban Forestry Division Director Reclassification (FY2023 Annual Budget Included Costs) and
Amending Appointed Pay Plan
A-9: Lease, Utilities, and Tenant Improvements for Two Police Substations ($678,462 from General
Fund Balance)
A-10: Gender Equity Renovations to Five Fire Stations ($750,000 from General Fund Balance)
A-11: Real Property Purchase ($430,000 from General Fund Balance)
A-13: New Computers and Associated Devices for Airport Police ($155,028.26 from IMS Fund)
A-14: Police Officer Patrol Overtime to Cover Vacant Positions and Officers on Leave ($2,539,019 from
General Fund Balance)
D-1: Market Pay Adjustment – General Fund Transfer to Golf Fund ($25,700 from Public Lands Budget
and $25,700 from Golf Fund Balance)
D-2: FY 2023 General Fund Funded Vehicle Purchases ($1,011,900 from Fleet Fund)
D-3: FY 2022 Fleet Vehicle Purchases ($90,000 from Fleet Fund)
D-4: Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 C Federally Taxable ($24,240,000 Bond Proceeds)
D-5: Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 B Non-Taxable ($44,997,846 Bond Proceeds)
D-6: General Obligation Series 2022 Streets Bonds Last Issuance ($23,494,958 Bond Proceeds)
D-7: Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 B & C First Debt Payment ($1,196,588 CIP Fund)
D-8: FY 2022 Year End Fleet Encumbrance Rollover to FY 2023 ($9,468,600 Fleet Fund)
D-9: FY 2022 Year End IMS Encumbrance Rollover to FY 2023 ($2,614,420 IMS Fund)
D-10: 2022-2023 Winter Shelter Overflow Patrol Resources ($378,560 from ARPA)
E-1 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant Increase for Homeless Resource Centers Flex Capacity and
Winter Overflow Shelter ($694,122 from State Formula Grant)
E-2: Rehabilitation of High Hazard Potential Dams: Lake Mary-Phoebe Planning and Design ($260,687
from Department of Homeland Security Grant)
E-3: Emergency Rental Assistance Program Additional Funding ($5 Million from U.S. Treasury)
E-4: Clean Neighborhoods Team Police Officer Overtime Mitigation Additional Funding ($1.664 Million
from ARPA)
Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 3
G-1: Utah Department of Health - Bureau of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) grant, FY23 Per Capita
Allocation ($10,948 from Misc. Grants)
Consent Agenda No. 4
G-1: Suga Education & Training Award, Suga Board of Directors ($30,000 from Misc. Grants)
G-2: State of Utah, The Utah Highway Safety Office, 2023 Distracted Driving Prevention Program
($17,000 from Misc. Grants)
G-3: US Department of Justice, 2022 Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) ($350,205 from Misc.
Grants)
G-4: U.S. Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women, 2020 YWCA Utah ($298,876 from
Misc. Grants)
I-1: Vouchers for Mobile Collection of RV Black Water Disposal Pilot Program ($10,000 from General
Fund Balance)
I-2: 200 South Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure ($38,000 Grant from Rocky Mountain Power)
I-3: Real Property Purchase ($3,567,564 Million from General Fund Balance)
I-4: Rescope of Local Match for Reconnecting Communities Pilot Discretionary Federal Grant ($1.24
million from Funding Our Future)
MOTION 2 – Senior Warehouse Operator New Position in Public Lands
I further move that the Council approve a new senior warehouse operator in the budget amendment.
A-4: New Public Lands Senior Warehouse Operator FTE ($18,750 from Golf Fund and Rescope
$18,750 from existing Public Lands Budget)
MOTION 3 – Two Contract Development Specialists New Positions in Finance
I further move that the Council approve two new contract development specialists in the budget
amendment.
A-8: Two New Contract Development Specialists in Finance ($103,900 from General Fund and $5,000
from IMS Fund)
MOTION 4 – Provisional Senior Project Manager New Position in Public Services
I further move that the Council approve a new senior project manager in the budget amendment.
A-12: One New Public Services Senior Project Manager ($133,000 from General Fund Balance)
MOTION 5 – Provisional Two Planners New Positions in Public Lands
I further move that the Council approve two new planners in the budget amendment.
A-12: Two New Public Lands Planner FTEs ($169,600 from General Fund Balance)
MOTION 6 – NOT ADOPT
I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item.
Item C3
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Nick Tarbet
Policy Analyst
DATE:December 13, 2022 – 6:00PM
RE:Master Plan and Text Amendment: Capitol Park Cottages - 675 N F Street
PLNPC2020-00335/00334
MOTION 1 – adopt with no conditions
I move the council adopt the zoning ordinances.
MOTION 2 – reject
I move the council reject the zoning ordinances.
MOTION 3 – adopt with development agreement conditions
I move that the Council adopt the ordinance amending the zoning of the property at 675 N. F Street
from FR-3-12,000 to SR-1 and amend the Avenues Community Master Plan future land use map,
subject to applicant entering into a development agreement with the City which includes the following
conditions:
1. Accessory buildings shall not be allowed in rear yards located along the west-most property
line of the subject property.
2. Where the west-most property line is a rear or side property line, the second levels of any
homes located along that rear or side property line shall be setback at least 30' from the
corresponding rear or side property line.
3. Specify that the ADUs may not be used as short-term rentals, using CCRs or another method
deemed efficient and appropriate.
4. The open space area shown on draft drawings will generally be accessible to the community at
large, with rules/management to be established by the HOA or other entity based upon the
applicant’s preference.
5. Confirming that the City building approval and permitting process will be followed to build
retaining walls on the property.
MOTION 4 – adopt with restrictions on retaining walls
I move that the Council adopt the ordinance amending the zoning of the property at 675 N. F Street
from FR-3-12,000 to SR-1 and amend the Avenues Community Master Plan future land use map,
subject to the following conditions:
1. The ordinance rezoning the property at 675 N. F Street will be published and become
effective only after the property owner records a restrictive covenant against the entire
property which will require that all walls built on the property are subject to the table in
21A.36.020B.
1. For any terrace of retaining walls, each four-foot vertical retaining wall must be
separated by a minimum of three horizontal feet.
2. The restrictive covenant will be approved by the City prior to recording and will be
enforceable by Salt Lake City Corporation.
COUNCIL STAFF
REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE: December 13, 2022
RE:Master Plan and Text Amendment:
Capitol Park Cottages - 675 North F Street
PLNPC2020-00335/00334
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Oct 18 & Dec 13, 2022
Set Date: Oct 18, 2022
Public Hearing: Nov 10, 2022
Potential Action: December 13
Public Hearing Summary and New Information
During the public hearing the Council heard comments both in support and opposition to the
proposed rezone. Most of the comments were opposed to the proposed zoning amendments.
Comments generally related to concerns about density, traffic, impacts to neighborhood character,
parking, questions about the safety of proposed retaining walls, especially for the existing
development to the north of the property and loss of open space and wildlife habitat.
The applicant and a few other individuals spoke in favor of the changes, citing the need for more
housing in the city.
The Council closed the public hearing and deferred action to a future Council meeting.
Following the public hearing Council Member Wharton asked for a motion to be drafted requiring
future development on the property adhere to the zoning ordinance pertaining to walls (City Code
21A.36.020B). This would effectively require any retaining walls to follow the design standards
identified in the draft motion below.
Page | 2
Staff worked with the Attorney’s Office and Planning staff on the following motion. This is option #4
on the motion sheet the Council will use when considering action on the zoning amendments.
I move that the Council adopt the ordinance amending the zoning of the property at 675 N. F
Street from FR-3-12,000 (Foothills Residential District) to SR-1 (Special Development Pattern
Residential District) subject to the following condition:
1. The ordinance rezoning the property at 675 N. F Street will be published and
become effective only after the property owner records a restrictive covenant
against the entire property which will require that all walls built on the property are
subject to the table in 21A.36.020B.
1. For any terrace of retaining walls, each four-foot vertical retaining wall must
be separated by a minimum of three horizontal feet.
2. The restrictive covenant will be approved by the City prior to recording and will be
enforceable by Salt Lake City Corporation.
The applicant confirmed they support including the following conditions as part of the final ordinance.
The first two were recommended by the Planning Commission, the others are requests of the Council.
This is option #3 on the motion sheet.
1. Accessory buildings shall not be allowed in rear yards located along the west-most property
line of the subject property.
2. Where the west-most property line is a rear or side property line, the second levels of any
homes located along that rear or side property line shall be setback at least 30' from the
corresponding rear or side property line.
3. Specify that the ADUs may not be used as Short-Term Rentals. (Using CCRs or another
method that you determine to be efficient and appropriate)
4. The open space area shown on draft drawings will generally be accessible to the community at
large, with rules/management to be established by the HOA (or other entity based upon the
applicant’s preference.
5. Confirming that the City building approval and permitting process will be followed to build
retaining walls on the property.
The following information was provided for the November 10 Public Hearing. It is
provided again for background purposes.
Work Session Briefing
The Council talked about the impact of increasing the density of the property on the surrounding
neighborhoods. Many of the questions included the following:
•How will the ADUs be incorporated into the project, will any be rented at an affordable rate
•Will the open space shown on the draft plans be open to the public
•Loss of existing open space and mature trees
•The lack of public transit in the area
•Density is needed in all parts of the city to help address the lack of housing supply
•How this proposed rezone fits in with the current development patterns, some expressed
concerns it does not fit in well
Page | 3
•Could the current zoning be sufficient to build more density that is also more compatible with
existing development.
•How will the city ensure the retaining walls in the proposed development, especially the walls
on the north side, be built so they will not collapse
Some Council members expressed interest in working with the developer on a potential development
agreement that could address some of the question raised above.
The applicant addressed the council, providing an overview of their plans. They detailed how they
think including the ADUs will be a benefit and that the proposal can fit in with the current
development in the area.
The public hearing is scheduled for November 10, 2022
The following information was provided for the October 18 work session briefing. It is
provided again for background purposes.
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will be briefed on a proposal to amend the Avenues Community Master Plan and rezone
the property located at approximately 675 North F Street. The request includes the following
applications:
1. Master Plan Amendment: The applicant is requesting to amend the master plan designation
for the property in the Avenues Community Master Plan from "Very Low Density" to "Low
Density."
2. Zoning Map Amendment: Rezone the property from the FR-3/12,000 "Foothills Residential
District" to the SR-1 "Special Development Pattern" zoning district.
If the rezone request is approved, the property owner indicated their plans are to construct 19 single-
family homes. At least 14 of the homes would include an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). To complete
this plan, the applicant will also seek approval from the Planning Commission for a planned
Development and preliminary subdivision plat. According to the transmittal letter, these plans are still
pending consideration by the Planning Commission and require some revisions before they can be
considered.
Planning staff recommended and the Planning Commission forwarded a favorable recommendation.
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions
As stated in the transmittal letter, Planning staff and the Planning Commission both recommended
two conditions of approval intended to ensure compatibility of any development on the subject
property with the 35' rear yards of the adjacent west properties.
These conditions are:
1. Accessory buildings shall not be allowed in rear yards located along the west-most property
line of the subject property.
Page | 4
2. Where the west-most property line is a rear or side property line, the second levels of any
homes located along that rear or side property line shall be setback at least 30' from the
corresponding rear or side property line.
For context, the FR-3 has a 35' rear yard requirement and does not allow buildings in the rear yard,
whereas the SR-1 zone has a percentage rear yard requirement, which can go as low as 15', and allows
accessory buildings in rear yards.
Policy Questions
•The Council may wish to ask if the applicant is supportive of the conditions recommended by
the Planning Commission and Planning Staff.
•Affordability of units/ADUs
o The Council may wish to ask the applicant if there are plans to require
any of the ADU units be rented at a more affordable rate and at what
percentage of AMI.
•Concerns about the proposed development have been raised about fire code compliance, access
for fire apparatuses, etc. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the potential impact
wildfires in the foothills may have on this development and whether those are factored into the
permit process. Typically, any development will be required to abide by fire codes which
includes minimum requirements for fire vehicle access.
o The Council may wish to ask the Administration to provide an overview
of the permitting process and how it may address these concerns.
•Concerns have been raised about the steepness of lot and the proposed retaining walls and,
how will the city ensure they will be built so they will not fail.
o The Council may wish to ask the administration to provide an overview of
the permitting process and how it may address these concerns.
•The draft plans identify some open space will be included on the south side of the property
o The Council may wish to ask what the plans are for that open space. Is it
meant to be public or private?
•The application has been in process for about two years and has some changes from the
original proposal.
o The Council may wish to ask the applicant how the current proposal has
changed from the start and how they have responded to issues raised by
the community and City staff.
Vicinity Map
Attachment A, Planning Commission Staff Report
Page | 5
Public Process
A narrative of the public process is outlined on pages 2-3 of the Transmittal Letter. The table below
provides the key dates of the petition’s process.
Page | 6
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
(Page 11 transmittal letter)
Council Public Engagement
A project website for the public to follow this issue has been posted on the Council website. It will be
updated as new information becomes available.
Key Considerations
The planning commission staff report noted six key considerations outlined on pages 9-23. Below is a
short summary of those considerations. Please see the Planning staff report for full analysis.
Page | 7
1. Consideration 1: Proposed Zone Potential Effects on Adjacent Properties
•Zoning amendment considerations include how an amendment will affect adjacent
properties
•FR-3/SR-1 zones primarily differ in density (min. lot area), lot width, and rear setbacks
• Rear setbacks and rear accessory structure allowances differ
•SR-1 zone may allow development closer to the FR-3 property, staff recommends
condition imposing 30' rear upper-level setback and rear accessory building
prohibition
•Density brings additional traffic, traffic study shows limited impact
2. Consideration 2: Zoning and Density Context
•SR-1A zone (sister to SR-1) mapped over most of the “lower” Avenues (below 13th Ave),
with identical regulations, excepting height (25' v 28') and accessory structure size
•Nearby SR-1A properties are generally not developed to their maximum allowed
density
•Property is proposed for development (in concept) and would likely develop with the
rezone at a higher density than existing surrounding properties
•The proposed density is found in the Avenues and in many places compatibly co-exists
with lower density properties
3. Consideration 3: Avenues Master Plan and Citywide Housing Policies
•Avenues Master Plan (1987) calls for “very low density” on the Future Land Use map
and supports larger lot sizes in “foothill” areas
•Avenues Master Plan text calls for “low density” development on the property
•Growing SLC (2018), the City’s current housing plan, includes citywide policies to
increase housing options and types of housing throughout the City
•Support in-fill development and modifying zoning regulations when appropriate and
where it can be compatible in scale
•Citywide policies support amendment to Avenues Master Plan and zoning given
broader City goals, changed conditions, the low level of density proposed, and its
compatibility potential
4. Consideration 4: Gentrification and Displacement
•The City is working on plans and policies to address gentrification and displacement
concerns
•Rezones are often requested for properties that consist of existing lower-income
affordable housing and so the zoning change is associated with the potential to displace
people with lower incomes
• This property is unique in being a sizeable vacant property that can accommodate infill
development without displacing any existing residents
5. Consideration 5: Proposed Development Plans
•19 total single-family home lots
•14 homes on the proposed private street will include ADUs
•Homes will include 3 covered parking stalls. 1 for ADU, 2 for single family dwelling
Page | 8
•Min. 20' depth driveways
•Avg. lot size 6,800 sq ft
•5 homes on F Street will be “custom homes” – no specific plans. May include ADUs.
• private park lot (17,432 sq ft/0.4 acre)
•Average Lot Size (Overall): 7,355 sq ft
•Density: 5.9 units per acre (Single-family units only)/10.3 units per acre (single-family
+ ADUs)
6. Consideration 6: Public Comments and Concerns
•This section focused on the concerns raised by the community, including ADUs and
Short Term Rentals, traffic impacts and accidents, affordable housing, air pollution,
adequacy of public utilities, Fire codes pertaining to access and street width, property
values, nesting bird habitat, tree protection and school enrollment/Family supportive
housing.
•Planning staff provides a response to each of these concerns in the staff memo, Pages
19-24.
Intermountain GeoEnvironmental Services, Inc.
12429 South 300 East, Suite 100, Draper, Utah 84020 ~ T: (801) 748-4044 ~ F: (801) 748-4045
Copyright 2022 IGES, Inc. 02058-205 L1.docx
December 8, 2022
Ivory Development
978 Woodoak Lane
Salt Lake City, Utah 84117
Attn: Peter Gamvroulas
IGES Project No: 02058-205
Subject: Memo Regarding Retaining Walls
Capitol Park Subdivision
Salt Lake City, Utah
Reference: IGES, 2020, Geotechnical Investigation, Capitol Park Subdivision, Capitol Park
Ave. and F Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, Project No. 02058-118, dated March 3,
2020.
Mr. Gamvroulas:
IGES has been asked to provide a memo regarding the process of retaining wall design. The
process of completing a retaining wall design starts with site reconnaissance, this includes a
geotechnical investigation, survey of the site, and grading and drainage plan development. The
site reconnaissance will provide us with the soil parameters, location and loading conditions for
the retaining walls. With this information we size either the block or geogrid as needed to
provide the minimum required factors of safety based on the current industry standard of care.
Once the retaining wall design is complete our plans are provided to the contractor that builds
the retaining wall. During construction we will provide site visits to verify that the contractor
is building the retaining wall in accordance with our design package. After construction has
been completed, we use our documentation from the site visits to compile a letter stating that
the retaining wall was built per our design package.
Closure
All recommendations in the original geotechnical report should be followed. We appreciate the
opportunity to provide you with our services. If you have any questions, please contact the
undersigned at your convenience (801) 748-4044.
Respectfully Submitted,
IGES, Inc.
Justin W. Whitmer, P.E.
Project Engineer
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: August 15, 2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: PLNPC2020-00335/00334 Capitol Park Cottages Zoning Map and Master
Plan Amendment
STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Echeverria, Senior Planner, Planning Division,
daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com or 801-535-7165
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the proposed ordinance with conditions as recommended by
the Planning Commission.
BUDGET IMPACT: None.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The property owner, Ivory Development, represented by Peter
Gamvroulas, is requesting to amend the zoning of the property
located at 675 N F Street from the FR-3/12,000 "Foothills
Residential District" to the SR-1 "Special Development
Pattern" zoning district. The owner is also requesting to amend
the corresponding “Future Land Use Map” designation for the
property in the Avenues Community Master Plan (1987) from
“Very Low Density” to “Low Density” so that the master plan
will correspond with their requested low-density zone.
The applicant is requesting the amendments in order to
accommodate additional homes on the site. Under the current
zone, the maximum number of homes allowed is 11 homes. The subject property at 675 N F Street
is outlined in yellow on the above map.
8/15/2022
8/15/2022
Under the proposed zone the maximum number of homes allowed would be 27. Under each
scenario the homes could include ADUs. Realistically, through the normal City subdivision
process and without additional special approvals, such as a Planned Development, the site can
likely only accommodate around 9 homes under the current zone and 18 homes under the proposed
zoning. The development potential of the site under the current and proposed zoning is further
discussed on page 4 of the Staff Report.
The applicant has formally submitted Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision plat
plans to the City for consideration. Those plans propose 19 lots and include requests for
modifications to dimensional regulations to accommodate the number of lots. At least 14 of the
homes would include an ADU. Those plans are located in Attachment C and C.2 of the Staff Report
linked below. These plans are still pending consideration by the Planning Commission and require
some revisions before they can be considered by the Commission.
The key differences between the existing and proposed zones are the lot size requirements for
single-family homes, which are 12,000 square feet per lot with the current FR-3/12,000 zone and
5,000 square feet per lot for the proposed SR-1 zone. The zones otherwise have similar regulations
for setbacks and building coverage. Each zone allows development up to 28' in height. A
comparison of the zones is included on page 6 of the Staff Report.
The Commission considered a number of factors in their positive recommendation for the rezone
and those are detailed in the Staff Report linked below. These include the minimal impact the
additional homes would have on the neighborhood, surrounding similar zoning, lack of
displacement, current housing market conditions, and adopted City policies supporting additional
housing where it can be compatible with neighborhoods in both the Plan Salt Lake and Growing
SLC plans.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
The applicant submitted the amendment requests in May 2020. The Planning Division started an
early notification public process at that time, sending notices to the local community council and
nearby property owners and residents. The proposal went through multiple iterations with multiple
rounds of public notice and public input since that time. The applicant also met with the Greater
Avenues Community Council multiple times.
The Greater Avenues Community Council provided multiple letters in opposition to the proposal.
A new recognized organization, the Preserve Our Avenues Zoning Coalition (POAZC), which was
organized in response to the zoning proposal, also submitted formal input in opposition to the
proposal. Virtually all the public input received was opposed to the request, with over 600 letters
provided in opposition and less than 20 letters provided in support. Many of these letters were
provided by the same individuals over the course of multiple versions of the proposal. A petition
opposed to the first iteration of the zoning amendment was circulated by the POAZC in 2020 which
received over 2,000 signatures from across the Avenues.
A detailed overview of the two-year public process is in the Staff Report under “Community Input
and Public Process” on page 8 of the Staff Report. Responses to recurring concerns received about
the proposal are located in Consideration 6 on page 19 of the Staff Report. A slide highlighting
only immediately adjacent property owner concerns is located on slide 19 of Exhibit 3a.
Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation
The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the proposal on June 22, 2022. Notice of the
public hearing was sent via e-mail to the Planning listserv and to 406 e-mail addresses, including
all persons and organizations who had contacted City Staff about the proposal over the course of
the public process. Notices were also mailed to property owners and residents within 300 feet of
the proposal.
At the public hearing, 51 people provided comments, including two persons representing the
GACC and POAZ. Four people spoke in favor with the remainder speaking in opposition. Speakers
and comments are summarized in the minutes linked below. Generally, commenters expressed
concerns related to impacts of the proposed density, such as compatibility with the neighborhood,
traffic, and parking. Comments were also provided related to concerns with the associated
development plans.
Following the hearing, the Planning Commission discussed the public input, adverse impacts,
ownership, use of potential accessory dwelling units, neighborhood context and compatibility, the
level of density change, traffic, site conditions, the proposed development plans, the need for
additional housing, current housing conditions, and changes to City plan policies. A more detailed
summary of the discussion is located in the minutes. Following discussion, the Commission voted
to recommend approval of the amendments with conditions, with eight commissioners voting for
the amendments and two against.
Recommended Conditions
The Commission included two recommended conditions of approval. These conditions are:
1. Accessory buildings shall not be allowed in rear yards located along the west-most property
line of the subject property.
2. Where the west-most property line is a rear or side property line, the second levels of any
homes located along that rear or side property line shall be setback at least 30' from the
corresponding rear or side property line.
The conditions are intended to ensure compatibility of any development on the subject property
with the 35' rear yards of the adjacent west properties and were recommended by Planning Staff.
For context, the FR-3 has a 35' rear yard requirement and does not allow buildings in the rear yard,
whereas the SR-1 zone has a percentage rear yard requirement, which can go as low as 15', and
allows accessory buildings in rear yards.
Planning Commission (PC) Records for June 22, 2022 Meeting
a) Agenda (Click to Access)
b) Minutes (Click to Access)
c) Staff Report, see below for additional attachments (Click to Access)
a. Attachment B: Applicant Materials/Narrative
b. Attachment C.2: Full Size Landscape Concept Plan
c. Attachment K.1 & K.2: Public Comments Part 1
d. Attachment K.3 & K.4: Public Comments Part 2
e. Attachment K.5: Public Comments Part 3
EXHIBITS:
1) Ordinance
2) Chronology
3) Planning Commission Public Hearing Additional Materials
a) Planning Staff Presentation Slides
b) Applicant Presentation Slides
c) Additional Public Comments Received After Report Publication
d) Postmarked Public Notice
4) Notice of City Council Hearing
5) Original Petition
6) Mailing List
1. ORDINANCE
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2022
(Amending the zoning of property located at 675 North F Street
from FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District to
SR-1 Special Development Pattern Residential District, and amending
the Avenues Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 675 North F
Street from FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District to SR-1 Special Development Pattern
Residential District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00335 and amending the Avenues
Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00334.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 22,
2022 on an application submitted by Peter Gamvroulas (“Applicant”) to rezone property located
at 675 North F Street (Tax ID No. 09-30-455-021-0000) (the “Property”) from FR-3/12,000
Foothills Residential District to SR-1 Special Development Pattern Residential District pursuant
to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00335, and to amend the Avenues Community Master Plan Future
Land Use Map with respect to the Property from Very Low Density to Low Density pursuant to
Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00334; and
WHEREAS, at its June 22, 2022 meeting, the planning commission voted in favor of
forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said applications, subject
to conditions to prohibit accessory buildings in rear yards along the west most property line and
require a minimum 30' setback for second levels of homes along the west most property line; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the Property identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be
and hereby is rezoned from FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District to SR-1 Special
Development Pattern Residential District, subject to the condition identified in Section 3 herein.
SECTION 2. Amending the Avenues Community Master Plan. The Future Land Use
Map of the Avenues Community Master Plan shall be and hereby is amended to change the
future land use designation of the Property identified in Exhibit “A” from Very Low Density to
Low Density, subject to the conditions identified in Section 3 herein.
SECTION 3. Condition. The zoning map amendment and master plan amendment that
are the subject of Petition Nos. PLNPCM2020-00335 and PLNPCM2020-00334 described
herein are conditioned upon Applicant restricting the use of the property by means of an
appropriate instrument recorded against the property in favor of Salt Lake City Corporation that
does the following:
1. Accessory buildings shall not be allowed in rear yards located along the west-most
property line of the subject property.
2. Where the west-most property line is a rear or side property line, the second levels of
any homes located along that rear or side property line shall be setback at least 30' from
the corresponding rear or side property line.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. The city recorder is
instructed not to publish or record this ordinance until the condition identified above has been
met as acknowledged by the director of the Salt Lake City Planning Division.
SECTION 5. Time. If the condition identified above has not been met within one year
after adoption, this ordinance shall become null and void. The city council may, for good cause
shown, by resolution, extend the time period for satisfying the condition identified above.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2022.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2022.
Published: ______________.
Ordinance amending zoning and MP 675 N F Street
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney
August 4, 2022
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Description of Property to be Rezoned
and Subject to Avenues Master Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment:
675 North F Street
Tax ID No. 09-30-455-021-0000
LOT 1, CAPITOL PARK AVENUE EXTENSION SUBDIVISION.
2. CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Capitol Park Cottages Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendment
May 1, 2020 Petition submitted by applicant requesting to rezone the property to FB-
UN1 and amend the future land use map of the Avenues master plan to a
corresponding designation.
May 11, 2020 Application assigned to City Staff.
May 27, 2020 Proposal posted to City Open House webpage. Minimum 45-day notice
period starts. Public notices were sent to recognized community
organizations, listserv, and nearby property owners/residents.
July 1, 2020 Applicant attended Greater Avenues Community Council meeting and
presented their proposal. Staff also attended meeting and presented on the
process and standards.
August 5, 2020 Applicant attended the GACC for a second time to present their proposal.
GACC holds vote on the proposal with 688 opposed and 4 in favor.
February 1,
2021
Applicant submitted revised concept plan. City Staff sent an e-mail update
to all persons who had contacted City Staff, providing 45 days for additional
public comments.
March 3, 2021 Applicant attends GACC meeting and presented revised proposal. Staff
attended to answer any questions.
March 22, 2021 Applicant revised requested zone to SR-1, Special Development Pattern
Residential. Staff sent an e-mail update to all persons who had contacted
City staff, providing additional time for public input.
April 7, 2021 GACC held a vote on the proposal at their meeting, with 1244 opposed and
25 in favor.
November 29,
2021
Applicant submitted associated Planned Development and Subdivision
applications to the City. Minimum 45-day notice period starts. Public
notices were sent to recognized community organizations, listserv, and
nearby property owners/residents. E-mail notice also sent to all persons
who had contacted City Staff regarding the rezone/master plan amendment
proposal.
January 5,
2022
Applicant attended GACC meeting to discuss Planned
Development/Subdivision applications. Staff also presented on the process
and standards and answered questions.
June 9, 2022 Public notices provided for Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendments.
Public notices sent to property owners/residents within 300 feet, posted on
City webpage, sent to City listserv, and posted on State public notice
website. E-mailed notice also sent to all persons who had contacted staff
regarding the proposal for the property.
June 17, 2022 Staff report published recommending a positive recommendation for the
zoning map and master plan amendment with conditions.
June 22, 2022 Planning Commission holds a hybrid in-person and virtual public hearing
on the zoning map/master plan amendments and passes a motion to send a
positive recommendation to the City Council with conditions. Motion
passed with 8 Commissioners in favor and 2 opposed.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
ADDITIONAL MATERIALS
a. Planning Staff Presentation Slides
PLANNING COMMISSION // JUNE 22, 2022
CAPITOL PARK COTTAGESZONING MAP AND MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT
675 N F STREET
PLNPCM2020-00335/00334
•Two requests:
•Zoning Map Amendment
•From FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential
District
•To SR-1 Special Development Pattern
Residential
•Master Plan Amendment
•From “Very Low Density” to “Low
Density”
•Intended to accommodate 19-lot single-family
development plans (Planned Development and
Preliminary Subdivision)
Recommendation: Staff is recommending a favorable
recommendation to the City Council with conditions
REQUEST
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
CONTEXT
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
Salt Lake City // Planning Division *Development agreement limited these RMF-35 properties to “low-density,” a lower number of units than otherwise allowed
ZONE INFORMATION
•FR-3 vs SR-1
•Lot size/density -min. 12,000 vs 5,000 sq ft
•3.6 (7.3) vs 8.7 (17.6) dwelling units per acre (w/ADU)
•Theoretical limits:
•FR-3: 11 lots
•SR-1: 27 lots
•Practical limit (estimate):
•Impacted by min. lot size, width, public street requirements,
private street access limits
•FR-3: 9 lots, 18 total dwelling units (5.6 du/ac)
•SR-1: 18 lots, 36 total dwelling units (11.2 du/ac)
•Higher lot counts would require discretionary modifications
to lot dimensions through Planned Development
•Applicant concept plans are 19 lots with ADUs on 14 lots
(33 total units)
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
DENSITY COMPARISON
Maximum 16-lot single-family development potential for typical
Avenues block due to min. 50' lot width. Theoretical limit-21 lots.
Major Differences:
•Lot size/density -min. 12,000 vs 5,000 sq ft
•3.63 (7.3) vs 8.7 (17.6) dwelling units per acre (w/ADU)
•Rear setbacks -min. 35' vs. min. 25%, as low as 15’
•Buildings not allowed in FR-3 rear
Similar:
•Heights:Both 28'
•Building coverage: Max. 35% vs 40%
•Effectively 5% more open space required in FR-3
•Front setbacks: Both 20'
•Side setbacks: 10’/10’ vs 10’/4’
•ADUs: Attached ADUs allowed by right in both zones
•Parking: 2 stalls per home + 1 per ADU
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
FR-3 VS SR-1 ZONES
Standard FR-3 SR-1
Min. Lot Size 12,000 sq ft 5,000 sq ft
Min. Lot Width 80 ft 50 ft
Min. Front Setback 20' or average 20' or average
Min. Rear Setback 35'25%, min. 15' to max 30'
Max. Building Coverage 35%40%
FR-3
SR-1
•Consistency with adopted City plans and policies
•Consistency with zoning ordinance purposes
•Effects on adjacent properties
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
CONSIDERATION STANDARDS
•Consistency with any applicable overlays
•Adequacy of public facilities and services
Ultimately up to City Council discretion
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Effects of zone on adjacent properties is a consideration
Rear Setback Difference:
•FR-3 -35' and no buildings allowed
•SR-1 -25%, min. 15', up to 30' (ex: 25' for 100' deep lot)
•May be as close as 15’
•May impact privacy of rear yards and sense of openness
Recommendation:
•Min. 30' rear setback for second story
•No accessory buildings in west rear yards
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
SETBACK DIFFERENCES
Northpoint Drive
F
S
t
r
e
e
t
Private Yards
Private Street
•More units bring more traffic
•How much traffic?
•Applicant provided traffic study showing low impact to
neighborhood.
•Will account for 5% of traffic at nearby F Street intersections
•Adding less than a second to wait times at intersections
•Accidents
•Very low number of serious accidents on or near F Street over
time
•Given relative low increase in traffic, Staff would not
anticipate substantive impact
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
TRAFFIC IMPACTS
F
S
t
r
e
e
t
•Sister zone (SR-1A) mapped across adjacent blocks to
the east and nearby blocks to the south
•Difference is lower max. height (23' in SR-1A vs 28')
•Density/lot requirements are the same
•Compatibly interfaces with FR-3 along 11th, 12th, and
13th Aves
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
ZONE CONTEXT
•Proposed plan density is ~10 du/ac
•Practical limit (~11 du/ac)
•Similar to density of many blocks in Lower Avenues
•Other nearby blocks would meet or exceed if ADUs were built
in existing homes
•Examples of low scale, single-and
two-family dwellings on nearby
blocks with similar existing density
•Compatible with surrounding
properties.
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
DENSITY CONTEXT
❶F Street & 10th
❶
❷F Street & 9th
❷❸
❸D Street & 9th
•Avenues Master Plan (1987)
•Future Land Use map –“very low density”
•Supports larger lots in foothill areas
•“Low Density” on former BYU property (incl. subject site)
•Citywide Plans
•Housing Plan (Growing SLC, 2018)
•Policies intended to ensure low-and moderate-
income housing is in the City
•Supports aging in place with diverse housing choices
•Identifies large lot sizes as a barrier
•City General Plan (Plan Salt Lake, 2015)
•Supports finding ways to accommodate new housing
growth and new housing types where it can be
compatible throughout the City
•Housing market has changed significantly
•Amendments warranted given level of zone change,
changed conditions, and changed citywide policies
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
CITY MASTER PLANS
•Concerns with many rezones:
•Displacement
•Gentrification
•Loss of neighborhood character defining buildings
•Large, vacant lot without these potentials
•High opportunity area with good access to jobs,
schools, parks, services
•Good location for additional families
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
VACANT LOT INFILL DEVELOPMENT
•Applicant has submitted formal Planned
Development and Subdivision plans
•Not for formal consideration tonight
•Provided for context
•Building height compliance issues due to
slope, may require revisions
•Height can’t be modified in a PD
•Requesting modifications to setbacks, lot
frontage (private street), grade change limits,
retaining wall height limits
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
CONCEPT SITE PLAN
•Considerable amount of public input
•Proposal has changed over time, with multiple rounds of comments
•Originally FBUN1 -> Changes to concept plans -> Change to SR-1 -> Formal Planned Development plans
•Vast majority opposed (~637 comments), less than 20 comments in support
•Opposition petition estimated at >2,000 signatures opposed
•Recognized Community Organizations:
•Greater Avenues Community Council provided multiple letters opposed
•Preserve Our Avenues Zoning Coalition also provided opposition letters and petitions
•Variety of concerns related to increased density of zone
•Support development with existing zoning
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
PUBLIC INPUT
Zoning Specific Comments from Adjacent Properties
•West Homes*: Preference for 35' rear setback from 1 owner
•East Homes*:
•Concerns with density, traffic, vehicle access from 2 owners
•Concern with original FB-UN-1 zone from 1 owner
•South -Meridian Condos HOA -Concerns with density, vehicles,
character, use of their private road
•Capitol Park HOA –(Homes on Capitol Park Ave) –Similar
concerns
•North -Northpointe Condos HOA –Similar concerns, also with
north adjacent reduced setback, traffic, fire access/safety related
to F Street and off-site parking
Planned Development Comments
•Concerns with reduced setbacks, grade changes, open space,
vehicles, parking, service logistics, and loss of trees
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
PUBLIC INPUT
RECOMMENDATIONS
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
Staff recommends a positive recommendation to the City
Council on the zoning map and master plan amendment request
with conditions:
1.Accessory buildings shall not be allowed in rear yards located
along the west-most property line of the subject property
2.Where the west-most property line is a rear property line, the
second levels of any homes located along that rear property
line shall be setback at least 30' from the corresponding rear
property line.
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
RECOMMENDATION
QUESTIONS
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
Daniel Echeverria // Senior Planner
daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com
3. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
ADDITIONAL MATERIALS
b. Applicant Presentation Slides
Capitol Park Avenue Rezone
675 North F Street
1977 Current
The current zone is outdated and no longer
reflects the current site conditions or values of
Salt Lake City
At Current Zone, the
physical constraints of
the property would
limit development to
nine 1/3 acre lots.
“Density and compact development are
important principles of sustainable growth,
allowing for more affordable transportation
options and creating vibrant and diverse
places” (pg. 9)
“Barriers such as density limitations,
prohibitions on different types of housing,
and other development regulations, have
contributed in part to a general supply
deficit and economic segregation” (pg.11)
The current zone is
outdated and no
longer reflects the site
conditions or values of
Salt Lake City
The requested rezone is
modest while creating
an opportunity to
remove density barriers
and promote a more
diverse housing stock
3. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
ADDITIONAL MATERIALS
c. Additional Public Comments Received After
Report Publication
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 1 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) DO NOT allow Capitol Park Catastrophe
Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 8:06:54 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From:William LiLg
To:Planning Public Comments
This is markeOng. This is not like any part of The Avenues, paSerned, repeOOve housing, red
brick. This a cheap Disneyesque unimaginaOve package of BULL SHIT. We have small streets,
impacted by hospitals, canyons, and we have reached capacity. This property could support real
architecture, new, not hermaphrodite history, Please do NOT support this latest packaging. They
are hoping you and this community will Ore and roll over. When they bring quality we will know
and support it, second or third best is not good enough.
Some one got Ored and allowed “The Hardison” to be built on Historic South Temple and it will
forever be an eyesore. DO YOUR BEST for the city.
William liLg
121 D Street
SLC, Ut 84103
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 2 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) NO! Support for Capitol Park POS
Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 7:46:56 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From:William LiLg
To:Planning Public Comments
MarkeOng! This is a sales job, clear and simple. Simple? Where in the Historic Avenues could you find
paSerned small houses in mass? Red brick? This is another insult to my community not part of us! It is them
trying to bring Daybreak’s Disneyesque housing to a small piece of land. Maximum density and more. We
have small narrow streets, trees and need to encourage families. NIMBY I wouldn’t wish this at Mar-a-lago!
They
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 5 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) 675 N F Street Zoning Plan and Master Plan amendment request - Deny
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 11:07:52 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Russ Norvell
To:Planning Public Comments
To: Salt Lake Planning Commission
From: Russ Norvell
As a nearby homeowner and full-Ome resident, I oppose Ivory Homer’s proposal to rezone the 675 N F Street
property in order to develop it far beyond that which is already allowed under FR-3 zoning. I encourage the Planning
Commission to do the same and not give a favorable recommendaOon to City Council for three reasons:
1) The two Staff recommendaOons do not begin to address the long list of issues- legal, transportaOon, strategic
planning, and cultural character - that have been idenOfied and documented;
2) Amendments to the Strategic Plan and to zoning rules can and should be made - when they meet the intent of the
amendment guidelines. This proposal does not, and giving a favorable recommendaOon sets precedent that will
erode the Commission’s ability to execute its mission in the future;
3) Too big and too many is too much. Ivory’s design is a fat man in a bad suit.
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 6 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Ivory Homes Development
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 8:20:57 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Adrienne
To:Planning Public Comments
Planning commission:
As a neighbor of the proposed ivory home planned development, I want to share my concerns as follows:
1. I believe that neighbors in the area have bought property based on existing zoning laws and to that end, a change in these
laws deserves much scrutiny. From my perspective, the developers have not made the case that this change is warranted
and thus the city’s agreement with current residents (existing zoning) should not be broken. As proposed, not a single unit
meets the zoning requirements.
2. I see that part of the planning commission’s justification for recommending this change is that SLC has a tremendous
housing problem - especially lacking low-income housing. If the described change were for low income families, this would
offset some of my issues personally (e.g., increased traffic). Given that the majority of the proposed houses are 3350 sq ft,
with three-car garages, the idea that this model fits in with the type of housing needed in SLC is ridiculous.
3. The design that includes 17ft retaining walls is an aesthetic disaster as is removing trees that include active raptor nests.
Thank you,
Adrienne Cachelin
510 E 14th Ave
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 7 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Support for Capitol Park CoSages
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 1:28:50 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Holly
To:Planning Public Comments
My greatest concern for this change in zoning is the traffic increase. We have already had bus service reduced
significantly and constant traffic specifically in this area is noOceable and a problem. Roads are in disrepair
with only bandaid maintenance over recent years Water use is another concern and hopefully restricOons
and restraint would be designed into the landscaping.
Sent from my iPad
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 8 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Support for Capitol Park CoSages
Date:Monday, June 20, 2022 at 8:37:36 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:pamellagl
To:Planning Public Comments
Dear Members of the Planning Commission. Please deny the request for Capitol Park CoSages. I live in the Avenues
and request that you deny the rezone! NO to REZONE!
Pam LiLg
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 9 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Support for Capitol Park CoSages
Date:Monday, June 20, 2022 at 7:11:25 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Bonnie Bowman
To:Planning Public Comments
Please, DO NOT APPROVE! A disaster.
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 10 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) I strongly appose Ivory Home plan in the upper Avenues.
Date:Monday, June 20, 2022 at 6:30:50 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:PaSy Philpot-Stewart
To:Planning Public Comments
The Penny Lane development was a mistake. Traffic in the Avenues is already unmanageable.
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 11 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) No Support for Capitol Park CoSages' latest proposal
Date:Monday, June 20, 2022 at 5:31:50 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Carol Moss
To:Planning Public Comments
I wish to state that the plan being presented is not good for the neighborhood. It will put
extreme demands on the resources of the neighborhood, namely with traffic, parking,
busing, fire fighting when needed, privacy matters, and will not truly address the city's
need for more housing. The prices of these homes will be very much out of the price
range that middle class homeowners can afford.
The zoning requirements that are in place at this time are part of a well planned
neighbor that was built with this specific zoning in place. It's a beautiful neighborhood
that I suggest your members visit and assess before making a decision on the upcoming
request for change in zoning, which will overpopulate the property in question.
Our wish is that the proposed building company of Ivory be satisfied with the current
zoning laws and you allow the laws to remain in place.
Thank you.
Warmest regards,
Carol Brennan Moss
Brian H. Moss
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 12 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Support for Capitol Park CoSages
Date:Monday, June 20, 2022 at 5:05:28 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:HELEN HODGDON
To:Planning Public Comments
I don’t support this project. I own a coSage on D Street. Keep the Avenues historical please. I think this
project is really just about greed. Thank you.
Helen Hodgdon
230 D Street
Slc, Utah. 84103
Sent from my iPhone
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 13:00:23 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 1 of 1
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Comments for today's Ivory Homes proposed rezoning hearing
Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 8:52:42 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Beth Chardack
To:Echeverria, Daniel, Wharton, Chris
I am in strong opposition to the proposed zoning and masterplan changes in the upper
Avenues by Ivory Homes.
According to the City’s zoning code, “The purpose of the FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential
District is to promote environmentally sensitive and visually compatible development.” This
means that high density urban zoning does not belong on the Ivory parcel. Our masterplan
exists to uphold that continuity and preservation of the neighborhood. The proposed zoning
would set dangerous precedent for future building and would invite others to disregard the
integrity of the zoning code and masterplan. These documents exist to preserve our
neighborhoods and must be kept intact.
In addition, building ADUs onto proposed new higher density construction just adds fuel to
the fire. It is my belief that Ivory Homes is bastardizing the intent of the ADU, by calling the
extra units they are hoping to build ‘ADUs’, instead of simply calling it what it is: higher
density housing. This change in nomenclature is merely a guise so Ivory Homes can
maximize profit without regard to the consideration of carefully thought-out plans and
regulations put in place years ago by professional urban planners, meant to protect
homeowners and neighborhoods from this very situation. Let’s allow these documents to
preserve our neighborhoods and natural areas.
The protection offered by the Foothills preservation zoning must mean something, and failure
to enforce the current zoning deems the very work of the Planning Commission irrelevant.
Ivory’s proposal would have a serious negative impact, without providing benefit to the
neighborhood or consideration to preserving the natural area around it. Ivory has failed to
prove that their project deserves deviation to the planning and zoning goals of the City and
the Avenues. This site is zoned for eleven homes (plus allowable ADUs), which is the
maximum that should be allowed on this site. The request to change the zoning code and
masterplan by Ivory Homes is misguided and should be denied.
Thank you.
Beth Chardack
BA, Political Science, University of Michigan
MA, Urban and Regional Planning, George Washington University
MA, Public Administration, University of Utah
563 Cambridge Cir
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Dear Planning Commission:
My husband and I are long-time residents of the Avenues. We strongly object to Ivory Homes’ current
request for rezoning at the property located at 675 N ‘F’ Street. Ivory is requesting a rezone from FR-3
to SR-1. This will reduce the minimum lot size to only 5000 sq ft. They are also requesting an increase
from 11 to 19 homes. Moreover, Ivory plans to include 14 or so ADUs. That’s a total of 33 new living
units. That’s not suitable for the Avenues. The intent of allowing ADUs to exist was to provide help for
individual homeowners who felt the need. The intent was NOT to help a developer make more money
on less land. Ivory’s rezone request is altogether too dense for this location.
As you are well aware, zoning regulations exist for a reason. If zoning regulations can be changed
whenever a developer wants to change them, what good are they? If the proposed changes were for the
good of the community, maybe that would be a reason to approve a rezone. Well, in this case, the
rezone is definitely not for the good of the community. This is totally obvious if you look at the results
of past votes taken by the Greater Avenues Community Council (GACC) [1244 to 25 against rezoning].
The rezone would only be for the good of Ivory Homes, so they could squeeze more money out of their
intended project.
We are concerned about growing traffic on our Avenues streets. These streets were designed and built
many years ago. They were not built for heavy usage. They already present risks at 4-way corners.
So much additional traffic from the proposed over-populated cottages would exacerbate the dangers.
Then, because we are at a higher elevation than most parts of Salt Lake City, the risks get even worse
on snowy or icy days. In addition, we are an active neighborhood, with many walkers and cyclists.
Please notice our attempts at “traffic calming.” We don’t need more traffic to add more danger for
pedestrians!!!!!
Ivory’s request is not compatible with the ambiance of our neighborhood. Two of the aspects we most
love about the Avenues are the relative quiet of the neighborhoods and the presence of older,
individually-built homes, each with their own unique characteristics. These proposed homes do not
align with that vision. According to Ivory’s plans, there will be minimal setback and minimal
greenspace. There are even a number of lovely mature trees that would be removed. That’s bad for
wildlife, bad for aesthetics, bad for our quality of life, and not suitable for the Avenues.
In summary, Ivory Homes’ request for a rezone at 675 N ‘F’ Street lacks a logical basis for approval.
Please do the right thing and do not approve the request.
Respectfully submitted,
Carolyn Clark
929 N Terrace Hills Dr
SLC UT 84103
1
Clark, Aubrey
From:Courtney Henley <courtney.henley@icloud.com>
Sent:Wednesday, June 22, 2022 2:24 PM
To:Planning Public Comments
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Opposed to Rezone of 675 N F Street
I am strongly opposed from the depths of my body and spirit to the application to amend the zoning of the property at 675 N F
Street from the FR‐3/12,000 (Foothills Residential) zone to the SR‐1 (Special Development Pattern Residential) zone to allow three
times the number of lots to be developed.
The proposal by for profit Ivory Homes out of southern Salt Lake County is an insult to our local community in Salt Lake City. Ivory
Development currently has no stake in the future prosperity of the local community and seeks to maximize profit by negating
decades old community master plans. For more than 40 years the Avenues community has been committed to honoring and
preserving it’s low density urban/rural character. For 20 years my family has dedicated our lives and livelihood to cultivation of low
density nature loving development on our property at 13th Ave and J Street. It would be a betrayal for city planners to throw away
all of my family’s and neighbors' hard work.
Every aspect of the 1987 Avenues Community Master Plan would be violated by the applicant's proposed development: it is
incompatible with the historic district nature of the community, it includes multiple‐family dwellings out of character with the
neighborhood, it will cause dramatic increases in traffic congestion where there is none, it will destroy the ultimate parks and
recreation spirit of the rural/urban Avenues by developing precious avian nesting habitat, it would violate the proposals for
streetscape improvements that are less concrete and steel and more trees and open space.
For 40 years the community has supported the City Acquisition of Foothill Properties via agreements with Salt Lake County, the State
of Utah, and appropriate agencies of the Federal Government to ensure that public properties in the foothills are not sold to private
interests without giving the community an opportunity to purchase the property. This is a precedent that should apply to a deep
pocketed community organization like the most recent owner of the property ‐ the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints ‐ a tax
exempt organization as beholden to the welfare and spiritual nourishment of citizens as a county, state, or federal agency. When a
tax exempt church sold the property to a private interest for profit development it violated a sacred trust with the community. How
to restore this trust? The property in question should be zoned Open Space, Foothills Protection, or Public Lands. These are the
only master plan amendments that would honor the vision of the Avenues Community Master Plan.
Courtney Henley
635 J Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
801-502-9523
courtney.henley@icloud.com
1
Clark, Aubrey
From:Smith Douglas <swimdocdoug@gmail.com>
Sent:Wednesday, June 22, 2022 2:41 PM
To:Planning Public Comments
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Support for Capitol Park Cottages
As a long time Avenues resident and property owner, I am totally AGAINST the proposed rezoning to allow the
development of the misleadingly named Capitol Park Cottages. This would add density and traffic to the neighborhood
in ways that would be detrimental to the local quality of life. Thank you for allowing me to share my views. Doug Smith,
MD
From: Tyler Jack
Date: Monday, June 20, 2022 at 1:21 PM
To: Echeverria, Daniel
Subject: RE: (EXTERNAL) setbacks question
I wanted to shoot you one last note to remind you why I am against the re-zone. If you don’t remember
I live on the west side of the subject property and I do not want the re-zone simply because I’d like the
set-backs to stay at 35 ft. I think the project will be nice but I just don’t want another home less than 35
feet from my property line.
Thanks again for your consideration,
Tyler Jack
Manager - NMLS 132155
P: F:
www.frontlinefinancial.com
[Secure Upload]
This message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential, or
proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or believe that
you have received this correspondence in error, please delete this email.
June 21, 2022
To:
Daniel Echeverria, Senior Planner, Planning Division
Chris Wharton, District 3 Council Member and City Council Chair
Opposition to Ivory Homes Amended & Supplemented Rezoning Application
for 675 North F Street
Petition Number: PLNPCM2020-00334/00335/0034, PLNPCM2021-00656,
PLNSUB2021-01175, etc.
I am still very adamantly opposed the rezoning of 675 N. F Street property from FR-3/12,000
to SR-1 or any other zone other than the existing zoning.
I have lived at 790 Northpoint Drive for 21 years.
My home is directly across from the 675 North F Street Rezoning application.
I recommend Ivory Homes develop their “new-build, in-fill, planned community that
incorporates Accessory Dwelling Units” under the current foothills zoning goals.
Any zoning change will result in an overly dense and possibly a high elevation development.
Reduced setbacks to the north will impinge on the Northpoint Estates community.
Development will not help in providing affordable housing to those in need; the cost will be too
high, public transport is not available & amenities are not in walking distance.
No zoning change is needed to develop . The existing zoning adequately allows for ADUs while
also limiting over-dense construction.
This additional amended concept does not represent a substantial difference in creating a
development consistent with the existing foothills neighborhood density; nor does it commit to
a specific build density.
As a resident and very concerned citizen, I urge you to oppose the Ivory Homes rezoning
proposal for 675 North F Street. It is deleterious to my home and community.
Please support this community and represent the needs to the SLC Counsel to deny the
zoning change.
M Lisa Larriva, directly adjacent resident
790 Northpoint Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 11:12:40 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 1 of 1
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Rezoning 675 North F Street
Date:Friday, June 17, 2022 at 4:47:23 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Julie Mackie
To:Echeverria, Daniel
Dear Mr. Echeverria,
I am wriPng to oppose the rezoning of the property at 675 North F Street. If the city and neighborhood feels the
need to rezone, it should be done through changing Master Plan with the coordinaPon of the city government and
neighborhood. Changing zoning for the whim of a developer cannot be good city planning. I understand the desire
for higher density, but, this should be done on a Master Plan level and not piecemeal where a developer feels the
profit.
Please do not consider this. It is not in anyone's interest but the developer. Reasons to deny this amendment have
been put forth to you many Pmes and I only want reiterate my support to deny Ivory Development a zoning change.
Thank you,
Julie Mackie
685 G Street
June 18, 2022
Dear Mr. Echeverria, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Planning Commission,
It has come to my attention that on or about June 15th, a letter was transmitted to you by
Peter Wright of the Preserve our Avenues Zoning Coalition. That letter was accompanied by a
PowerPoint-style PDF that laid out their arguments. In that document, there was a claim made on
page 5 that “Every resident of F Street adjacent to Ivory’s property is strongly opposed.”
This statement is false, and was or should have been known to be false at the time of its
writing.
I purchased the property on the corner of F Street and 13th Avenue, directly opposite the lot
in question, on January 13th, 2022. A member of the Preserve our Avenues Zoning Coalition
identified me by name while speaking to my neighbors in April, and therefore knew that the house
was under new ownership. At no time have I expressed any opinion regarding this matter, publicly
or privately. At no time prior to June 15th had anyone spoken to me about this planned rezone,
representing either side.
I reserve the ability to formulate an opinion. Should I choose to do so, I will base that
opinion on a considered understanding of both sides’ arguments.
I feel that this must be brought to your attention, as a known false statement may affect the
credibility of the representatives of the Preserve our Avenues Zoning Coalition in the upcoming
hearing on June 22nd.
Regards,
Andrew Steiner
461 E. 13th Ave.
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
I write in support of the request to change the zoning map and the SLC master plan to
accommodate the Capitol Park Cottages proposal. I live in the Avenues myself, just below Sixth Avenue,
and prize the neighborhood for its diversity of housing types, mix of owners and renters, access to a
grocery store and public library, and economic diversity. The area surrounding the North F Street
property already has a variety of housing—town homes, large single-family homes, condos, and small
single-family homes. The “cottage” development envisioned (not yet officially under review) is not so
dense that it would appreciably increase traffic in the area. The larger homes proposed will be big
enough to accommodate families, which will help support the declining enrollment of Ensign
Elementary. The yards are small, but from looking around the Avenues, there are plenty of people who
wish to purchase a home and not have to do a lot of yard upkeep.
Salt Lake City (as well as much of Utah) is desperately short of housing of all kinds. Even if this
will not be income-restricted, “affordable” housing, increasing the supply at the likely price point will
ease the pressure on the housing market in general. Developing vacant property is ideal because it does
not displace existing, “naturally affordable” older housing. Yes, it is very important that the proposed
ADU’s not be used for short-term rentals, so I urge all parties to work to increase the enforcement
options available to cities to combat short-term rentals. The state Political Subdivisions Interim
Committee is studying this issue this summer and fall.
Approving the requested amendments would not damage the character of the Avenues. Salt
Lake City needs the additional housing. I urge the Planning Commission to support the requested
changes.
Susan Olson
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 15:55:28 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 1 of 2
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Support for Ivory Homes Rezoning at 675 North F Street
Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 3:34:01 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:JulieQe Palmer White
To:Echeverria, Daniel
CC:Wharton, Chris
AFachments:emailsignaturelogonotext_c4fe8a58-60ec-4e55-8f78-be04eY3833d.png
Mr. Echeverria,
Apparently, I'm late to the game and didn't realize that this issue was s]ll being debated in my
community. I became aware today that there is a planning commission mee]ng tonight regarding the
request by Ivory Homes for a rezone to allow higher density housing, ADUs, etc., at the top of F Street.
I cannot aQend this mee]ng, so I am wri]ng to you instead in the hopes that you will receive this
message before the mee]ng tonight and take it into account.
I am wri]ng to express my support. And I am wri]ng to reassure you that residents of the Avenues are
not unified in their opposi]on to this project. I have lived in the Avenues off and on since 1981,
including 15 years living on 18th Avenue and now 20 years living on Virginia Street. I have read many
of the comments / arguments in opposi]on to this project since the beginning and find myself
profoundly disappointed in what I can only describe as an intensely narrow and unyielding mindset
held by individuals that should know beQer.
I am now a parent of a teenager with significant disabili]es. And I have an aging mother. I was, and
remain, thrilled by the prospect of new and innova]ve housing op]ons in this wonderful community
that may allow me to support my child with disabili]es into adulthood, and provide a place for my
mother as she ages, all while providing them some level of independence in a separate ADU. I am
keen to see the City develop more mul]-genera]onal housing op]ons, more innova]ve solu]ons
other than typical apartments/condos or single-family housing. I am one of those Avenues residents
that will seek to add an ADU to their backyard someday if I cannot find another alterna]ve for my son
that will allow him to live in the community where he grew up and that he knows well, with as much
independence and dignity as possible.
And I want the future residents of this proposed development to live in my community and to be a
part of it. Those who object to this project appear to have a very limited view of who they want living
in the Avenues. I will never forget the first leQer I received in the mail from someone who opposed
this project -- the objec]on to "urban" zoning s]ll lingers in my mind. At first it made me laugh,
considering the many bus stops within just a few blocks, the number of condos and apartments nearby
(both above and below), and the grocery store/liquor store/shopping complex within six blocks. But
then the comment hit home, as I fear it is code for some other perceived threat.
I have no doubt that there was, and likely remains, much room for improvement in what Ivory Homes
is trying to do. And I have no love for developers. But I respect everyone who is trying to make this
work and trying to find innova]ve solu]ons for the housing challenges we now face in our City. Please
con]nue to do so.
I embrace a broader perspec]ve. The persistent and unyielding opposi]on to this project makes me
sad. There is no beQer to describe it.
Page 2 of 2
Sincerely yours,
JulieQe White
275 N Virginia Street
Juliette Palmer White • Shareholder
Parsons Behle & Latimer
201 South Main Street, Suite 1800 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Main +1 801.532.1234 • Direct +1 801.536.6804 • Fax +1 801.536.6111
A Professional
Law Corporation parsonsbehle.com • JWhite@parsonsbehle.com • vCard
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attachment(s) are confidential and may also contain privileged
attorney-client information or work product. The message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended
recipient, or the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, distribute, or copy this communication. If you
have received the message in error, please immediately notify us by reply electronic mail or by telephone at +1 801.532.1234, and delete
this original message.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
ADDITIONAL MATERIALS
d. Postmarked Public Notice
4. NOTICE OF CITY
COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2020-00335/00334 – Capitol
Park Cottages Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendments – Peter Gamvroulas, representing
the property owner, Ivory Development, is requesting zoning map and master plan amendments
for property located at approximately 675 N F Street. The request includes the following
applications:
A. Zoning Map Amendment (Rezone): The applicant is requesting to amend the zoning of
the property from the FR-3/12,000 "Foothills Residential District" to the SR-1 "Special
Development Pattern" zoning district. Although the applicant has requested that the
property be rezoned to the SR-1 zone, consideration may be given to rezoning the
property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Case number
PLNPCM2020-00335
B. Master Plan Amendment: The applicant is requesting to amend the master plan
designation for the property in the Avenues Community Master Plan from "Very Low
Density" to "Low Density." Case number PLNPCM2020-00334
The requests are intended to accommodate two pending Planned Development and Subdivision
requests for a 19-lot single-family dwelling development titled "Capitol Park Cottages." The
property is currently vacant and is zoned FR-3/12,000 "Foothills Residential District." The
property is located in Council District 3, represented by Chris Wharton. (Staff contact: Daniel
Echeverria at 801-535-7165 or daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com)
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive
comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE:
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: Room 315
City & County Building
451 S State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Daniel Echeverria at 801-535-7165 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday or via e-mail at daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com. Petition details can also be found
on the petition webpage here: http://bit.ly/slc-openhouse-01175
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. (P 19-19)
5. ORIGINAL PETITION
Zoning Amendment Questionnaire
Parcel Number 09304550210000
1. A description of the proposed zoning amendment: The property is currently zoned as FR-
3/12000 Foothills Estates Residential. The purpose of the FR-3/12000 foothills residential
district is to promote environmentally sensitive and visually compatible development of lots not
less than twelve thousand (12,000) square feet in size, suitable for foothills locations. The
proposed zoning designation for the property is FB-UN1 this zone allows for small scale
structures, up to two-and-one-half (2.5) stories in height, or relatively small lots with up to four
dwelling units per lot depending on the building type. The master plan amendment would
continue to allow the promotion of environmentally sensitive and visually compatible
development as envisioned in the FR zoning and would further provide the flexibility to enhance
housing type diversity in the neighborhood.
2. A statement declaring the purpose of the zoning amendment: The proposed Master Plan
amendment change is specific to the approximately 3 acer parcel 09304550210000; to be
changed from the residential large lot designation of FR-3 to accommodate a FB-UN 1 zoning
designation. This Master Plan amendment will enable the parcel to support an innovative
development in which diverse Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) are integrated into a planned
community development. The Growing SLC: Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 (“5YP”)
acknowledges that “ADUs are the most cost-effective method of new construction for small
housing units” (5YP pg. 20). The proposed development would showcase how a variety of ADU
types can blend into an existing neighborhood and provide housing solutions for diverse
demographics (students, seniors, young families). The development can further materialize the
objectives stated in the Five Year Housing Plan. The first Goal expounded in the Five Year Plan
recognizes the need to “increase the diversity of housing types and opportunities in the
city…Strategic policy decisions that integrate…innovative design and construction methods, can
break down social and economic segregation, thus building a city for everyone” (5YP pg.17).
3. List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area the present
master plan for this property was done in 1987 and new and innovative opportunities exist that
will allow for more current housing outcomes. The Five Year Housing Plan recognizes that “each
generation has different ideas and behaviors that influence their decisions at each stage of life,
and in the aggregate create the demand for housing” (5YP pg. 10). The current zone restricts
the property to rigid lot sizing that limits opportunities for diversity in housing and exacerbates
the housing affordability crisis. Furthermore, the Five Year Housing Plan acknowledges
“barriers, such as density limitations, prohibitions on different types of housing, and other
development regulations, have contributed in part to a general supply deficit and economic
segregation” (5YP pg. 11).
4. Is the request amending the zoning map? The request is amending the Zoning Map. The parcel
number to be changed is 09304550210000.
5. Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance? There is no request to amend the
text.
6. MAILING LIST
OWN_FULL_NAME own_address_andUNIT OWN_CITY OWN_STATEOWN_ZIP
JOSEPH FLANAGAN; AIRA FLANAGAN (JT)1326 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
WRIGHT PROJECT, LLC 1589 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
HAMILTON FAMILY 1998 TRUST 07/10/1998 171 E THIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NANCY H HALVERSON 1914 E 9400 S SANDY UT 84093
PETER WRIGHT; JANET WRIGHT (JT)20012 OAK FAIRWAY CT ESTERO FL 33928
JENI INDRESANO; MATTHEW A STELLA (JT)22 OLIVER STREET SALEM MA 01970
KELLEE W BURTON 22 S EAGLEWOOD DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054
MUFFY FERRO 2250 N STATELINE RD ALTA WY 83414
RICHARD WENDELL NIELSEN TRUST 05/04/2020 2321 S DALLIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109
LEO SOTIRIOU; CYNTHIA G SOTIRIOU (JT)250 E BROADWAY ST # 330 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
BENJAMIN ADAM STEINBERG; LAURA L STEINBERG (JT)290 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 298 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HUGH J SHARP; ANIKA N SHARP (JT)3 ROBINHOOD RD CAPE ELIZABETH ME 04107
JENNIFER L AZZI 307 LOWELL AVE MILL VALLEY CA 94941
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 3075 RED SPRINGS DR LAS VEGAS NV 89135
678 F STREET CONDOMINIUMS UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION 308 W 300 S # LL2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101
REED TOPHAM; ANNA TOPHAM (JT)310 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DANIEL H PAYNE; VANESSA I PAYNE (JT)315 E CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SFY TR; CBM TR 322 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DIANE B LANZL 329 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HENRY L LEVINE 340 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 343 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ROBERT RYAN RICHARDS; MARTINA WRIGHT RICHARDS (JT)343 E REDBRICK CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RICHARD SCHMIDT; NANCY SCHMIDT (JT)344 E CHARITY CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
WILL S TENNEY 346 E REDBRICK CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
FREEMAN FAMILY TRUST 03/08/2000 348 E REDBRICK CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JACOB H COPINGA; FRANCES R COPINGA (JT)349 E CHARITY CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 351 E REDBRICK CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 353 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MATTHEW TYLER; JUDITH TYLER (JT)354 E CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TINA B RUGA 357 E CHARITY CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DAVID M GRANT 357 S 1840 W CEDAR CITY UT 84720
P&B PROPERTIES III LC 3581 E WARR RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109
HERBERT H JR POLLOCK; DANA D POLLOCK (JT)363 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 3650 TYLER AVE OGDEN UT 84403
ANIQUE J MONFROOY 368 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 369 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CORY M SHIPP; BOBBI L MORGAN (JT)374 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BENJAMIN LANOHA 377 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DONALD R MORRIS; MAISA MORRIS (JT)381 E ELEVENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RAH LIV TR 385 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NAS REV LIV TRUST 386 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JMT TRUST 01/04/2019 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #101 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HAASTR 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #201 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DAVID L MAHER; MARILYN J MAHER (JT)400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #202 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MJM REV TRUST 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #202 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #204 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TODD A JENSEN; CARMELLE JENSEN (JT)400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #301 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KBB FAM TRUST 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #401 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MLVV FIVR TRUST 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #406 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CJC REV TRUST; GLC REV TRUST 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #501 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GLC REV TRUST 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #501 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NT MARITAL TRUST NO 1 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #502 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
AMBER SKOLNICK; JOSHUA SKOLNICK (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #503 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
AMBER SKOLNICK; JOSHUA SKOLNICK (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-9 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GEORGE B HOKE; G&EHFT 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #305 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JANET K MANCINI; VINCENT P MANCINI (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LINDA PEARLINE DEAN REVOCABLE TRUST 7/18/2013 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #303 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LINDA PEARLINE DEAN REVOCABLE TRUST 7/18/2013 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S30 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MERIDIEN AT CAPITOL PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NAOMA TATE; NTM #1 TRUST 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #504 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NAOMA TATE; NTM #1 TRUST 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S11 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PATRICIA A DAVIS; JOHN L DAVIS 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #403 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PATRICIA A DAVIS; JOHN L DAVIS 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S31 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PAUL & JANICE MCKINNON JOINT TRUST 01/09/2020 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #302 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PAUL & JANICE MCKINNON JOINT TRUST 01/09/2020 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #402 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PAUL D MCKINNON; JANICE W MCKINNON (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PAUL MCKINNON; JAN MCKINNON (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PETER BILLINGS; MARGARET BILLINGS (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #104 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PETER BILLINGS; MARGARET BILLINGS (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S26 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PETER BILLINGS; MARGARET BILLINGS (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S28 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SHOLLY KAGAN; CYNTHIA KAGAN (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #304 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SHOLLY KAGAN; CYNTHIA KAGAN (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SHOLLY KAGAN; CYNTHIA KAGAN (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S19 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S16 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
VICTORIA OWEN KLEIN 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #105 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
VINCENT P MANCINI; JANET K MANCINI (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #404 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GAYLE PERKINS TRUST 03/14/2019 405 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
OBLC 4066 BITHYNIA RD SANTA BARBARA CA 93110
WALTER R JONES; HELEN W JONES (JT)412 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
THOMAS W KEEN 415 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TERRY HALL; DREW HALL (TC)416 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 420 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BEDELL IRREVOCABLE TRUST 04/01/2015 423 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LEILA BROWN ARMKNECHT 433 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ALAN & PAMELA LAKOMSKI TRUST 08/05/2013 440 N VIRGINIA ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 453 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ALAN E CRAWFORD 456 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KODY M POWELL; ELISABETH C POWELL (JT)459 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HANNAH DUFFEY; DAN FRAME (JT)460 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KINNEY FAMILY TRUST 03/17/2020 461 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ANDREW STEINER 461 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RANDAL W KOZIATEK; GINA M KOZIATEK (JT)463 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NIRUPAMA RAMKUMAR; SANDEEP C MANYAM (JT)466 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ERIC C HANSEN 468 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PETER SUMMERILL 472 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 473 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SHARON RAMMELL 4732 S 4300 W REXBURG ID 83440
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 474 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JAD TRUST 475 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PATRICIA E KING 480 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
FREDRICK W REIMHERR; KATHLEEN R REIMHERR (JT)482 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KUBOTA REVOCABLE TRUST 03/09/2021 483 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CHRISTOPHER BURCH; SEUL YE PARK (JT)4885 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117
JEFFERY K SCOTT; SHEPARD SCOTT, SARAH P SCOTT (TC)489 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HOFFMANN LIVING TRUST 02/19/2019 504 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LAVERNE S JR ERICKSON 505 E FOURTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RUSSELL E NORVELL (JT)510 E FOURTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GARR SMITH; CATHY STUTZ-SMITH (JT)571 N E ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RYAN J KIER; DARCI TAYLOR (JT)572 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HENRY MITCHELL STEINMAN 573 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
STEPHANIE CAUMET 574 N E ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CHRISTINE PACKARD 577 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KENT M MILES; LINDA H MILES (JT)578 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ZACHARY DRAPKIN & ZOE RALEIGH FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 05/12/2020 584 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DAVID B YOUNG 585 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RONALD B WILKINS; SUSAN P WILKINS (JT)586 N E ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JOHN Y YOON; KATHERINE A YOON (JT)601 N D ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PATRICK MARTIN BURKE LIVING TRUST 11/12/2018 604 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ALAN B YORGASON; JANNETTE J YORGASON (JT)604 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
AMD & RESTATED DECLARATION OF TRUST OF THE DAVID PARKINSON TRUST 607 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ROBIN & JANE KIM FAMILY TRUST 10/09/2020 615 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MICHAEL P FILBEN; DIANE HILL (JT)618 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MAX D HUNSAKER 620 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RICHARD F GROW; JODY W GROW (JT)623 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JOHN NISSON 623 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
POVEY SKYE O 623 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ELIZABETH OWENS 623 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MS LIV TRUST 624 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BENJAMIN E FARR; ERICA J FARR (JT)626 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 633 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 655 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CHERI DAILY; MICHAEL STEVENS (JT)668 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PETAR GERMANOV; DIANA GERMANOV (JT)671 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JEP REV TRUST 672 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LANGHEINRICH, FRANK A; JT LANGHEINRICH 674 N CARING CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DG LIV TR; IS LIV TR 674 N CARING CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KAYALENE M SPATAFORE 678 N F ST # 678E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JARED J YOUNG; PAMELA BROWN (JT)678 N F ST # W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TYLER A JACK & ANN MARIE LEONE FAMILY TRUST 06/04/2019 684 N CARING CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 685 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LYNN M KEENAN; MARJORIE J MATHIS (JT)688 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GAC REV TR 689 N CARING CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JASON R PAUL 690 N CARING CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CHRISTOPHER C KOLB; HEATHER M KOLB (JT)695 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ADAM H HIRSCHEL; ALICE D HIRSCHEL (JT)701 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ELYCE B MOUSKONDIS; EBMT 7212 HELSEM BLVD DALLAS TX 75230
LON A JEKINS; RICHARD M MAXFIELD (JT)786 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 787 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ROLAND K BARBERO & CASSANDRA E BARBERO LIVING TRUST 01/26/2016 789 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MLL LIV TRUST 790 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DJB LIV TRUST 791 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ALAN B HAYES & SUSAN E MACNAMARA REVOCABLE TRUST 04/16/2020 793 N NORTHPOINT CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BRIAN H MOSS; CAROL B MOSS (JT)796 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NORTHPOINT ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 798 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
P KENT FAIRBANKS; MARY P FAIRBANKS (JT)799 N NORTHPOINT CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LORI ELIZABETH PASSEY; MARK PASSEY (JT)800 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KEVIN L HAVLIK TRUST 05/17/2021; CAROL A BALLOU TRUST 05/17/2021 801 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BRIAN RUGGLES; JANICE RUGGLES (JT)803 N GRANDRIDGE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BRENDAN BUCKNER 806 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HUGO ROSSI; JULIA ROSSI (JT)807 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MHN FAM TRUST 809 N GRANDRIDGE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GENESIS INVESTMENT CORPORATION 810 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CAROLE D NELSON REVOCABLE TRUST 7/1/1998 811 N GRANDRIDGE DR #29E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JUDY A DALY; JOEL L DEATON (JT)813 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JAMES H VIRDEN; ELIZABETH H VIRDEN (JT)814 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DJN LIV TRUST; JBN LIV TRUST 815 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LORETTA C RICE REVOCABLE TRUST 02/05/1996 817 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JOSEPH FOURNIER 819 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 820 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GENESIS INVESTMENT CORP 821 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 822 N GRANDRIDGE DR #49C SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
WILLIAM CRAIG STERN LIVING TRUST 12/23/2013 823 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KSCS LIVING TRUST 12/11/2020 824 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MICHAEL S ZAVELL; CHRISTINA B ZAVELL (JT)825 N JUNIPERPOINT CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO 825 NE MULTNOMAH ST #1900 PORTLAND OR 97232
JOHN T HOPKIN REVOCABLE TRUST 01/28/2002 826 N GRANDRIDGE CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
WARMBIER FAMILY TRUST 08/13/1999 827 N GRANDRIDGE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
EUGENE MISHCHENKO; GALINA POLEI (JT)828 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ALEX TREHARNE; ERIKA TREHARNE (JT)829 N GRANDRIDGE DR #41B SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TAMMY DEE BERKHOUDT 830 N GRANDRIDGE CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HEATHER HAMBY 834 N GRANDRIDGE CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
COLIN ROBINSON; JEANETTA ROBINSON (JT)835 N GRANDRIDGE CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JAT FAMILY TRUST 07/10/2002 839 N GRANDRIDGE CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
D&CLVK TR 843 N GRANDRIDGE CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MARK S LEVITT; KATHLEEN ANNE LUNG (JT)847 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 849 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DAVID HOPKINS; WENDY HOPKINS (JT)851 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PATRICK G AKERS; TERI L AKERS (JT)853 N JUNIPERPOINT DR #17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LIVING TRUST OF DAVID RICHARD GULLING 06/16/2021; DAVID RICHARD G 8718 REDONDO DR DALLAS TX 75218
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 88 E EDGECOMBE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PEMBROKE CAPITOL PARK LLC 940 N 1250 W CENTERVILLE UT 84014
IVORY DEVELOPMENT, LLC 978 E WOODOAK LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117
SKAAR PROPERTIES LLC 9846 E EMERALD DR SUN LAKES AZ 85248
KATHLEEN M HOLDING PO BOX 1083 DAYTON WY 82836
WILLIAM I HIGUCHI LEGACY TRUST 12/23/2020 PO BOX 1223 PARK CITY UT 84060
SALT LAKE CITY CORP PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED PO BOX 3181 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110
ASSOCIATED PROPERTIES, LC PO BOX 478 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110
MOUNTAIN SEAS DEVELOPMENT LTD PO BOX 680844 PARK CITY UT 84068
MOUNTAIN SEAS DEVELOPMENT LTD; NTM TRUST PO BOX 680844 PARK CITY UT 84068
CRAIG N PACINI; JULIE M PACINI (JT)PO BOX 708682 SANDY UT 84070
SPINAZZOLA JOINT REVOCABLE TRUST 06/03/2014 PO BOX 8891 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
CAPITOL PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION PO BOX 9375 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109
Current Occupant 794 N NORTHPOINT DR #3A Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 795 N NORTHPOINT CT Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 804 N JUNIPERPOINT DR Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 855 N JUNIPERPOINT DR Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 853 N JUNIPERPOINT DR Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 841 N JUNIPERPOINT DR Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 833 N GRANDRIDGE DR #42D Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 837 N JUNIPERPOINT CT Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 341 E CHARITY CV Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 673 N CARING CV Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 685 N CARING CV Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 675 N F ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 705 N G ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 505 E 14TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 535 E 14TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 669 N G ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 461 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 473 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 475 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 483 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 510 E 14TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 503 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 678 N F ST #W Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 678 N F ST #E Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 678 N F ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 320 E CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 342 E CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 610 N CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 590 N CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 317 E PENNY PARADE DR Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 375 E CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 589 N CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 588 N D ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 584 N D ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 574 N D ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 368 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 374 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 380 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 386 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 381 E 11TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 353 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 363 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 369 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 377 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 385 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 395 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 405 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 415 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 358 E CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 617 N F ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 433 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 423 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #101 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #102 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #103 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #201 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #202 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #203 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #204 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #205 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #301 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #306 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #401 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #405 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #406 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #501 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #502 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-1 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-2 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-6 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-7 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-8 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S10 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S12 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S13 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S14 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S15 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S18 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S20 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S21 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S22 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S23 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S24 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S25 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S27 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S29 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 456 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 468 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 472 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 480 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 615 N G ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 453 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 459 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 463 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 473 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 489 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 504 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 412 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 416 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 420 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 430 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 580 N F ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 460 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 466 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 474 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 482 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 488 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
DANIEL ECHEVERRIA
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114-5480
Item E1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:December 13, 2022
RE: Naming the Salt Lake City Justice Court Building the “John L. Baxter Justice Court”
MOTION 1 (adopt)
I move that the Council adopt a resolution naming the Salt Lake City Justice Court Building the “John L. Baxter
Justice Court.”
MOTION 2 (not adopt)
I move that the Council not adopt the resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. _______ OF 2022
Naming the Salt Lake City Justice Court the “John L. Baxter Justice Court”
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Code 3.65 creates a process for the naming of major City assets,
which includes a City-owned structure or facility.
WHEREAS, under City Code 3.65, the Mayor must provide the City Council with fifteen
business days’ notice of her intent to name a major asset, and the City Council may either allow
the fifteen days to pass, at which point the Mayor may name the major asset, or the City Council
may determine that the major asset should be named through a legislative process.
WHEREAS, Mayor Erin Mendenhall provided the City Council notice of her intent to name the
Salt Lake City Justice Court the “John L. Baxter Justice Court” in recognition of Judge John L.
Baxter’s over twenty years of service as a Salt Lake City Justice Court Judge and his service to
some of the most traditionally underserved people in Salt Lake City.
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the naming of the Salt Lake City Justice
Court should be done pursuant to a legislative process, and finds that there is good cause to name
the Salt Lake City Justice Court the “John L. Baxter Justice Court”.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SALT LAKE CITY
COUNCIL:
1. That the Salt Lake City Justice Court shall be named the “John L. Baxter Justice
Court”.
Passed by the Salt Lake City Council, this ____ day of December 2022.
________________________________
Dan Dugan, Council Chair
Attest:
______________________________
Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder
Approved as to form:
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: November 1, 2022
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: November 1, 2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: November 1, 2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Naming the Salt Lake City Justice Court building the “John L. Baxter Justice Court”
STAFF CONTACT: Rachel Otto
DOCUMENT TYPE: Informational item
RECOMMENDATION: Notify Council of the proposed building naming, per City Code
Chapter 3.65
BUDGET IMPACT: New signage is estimated to be approximately $35,000; the administration plans to
cover this amount through current departmental budgets.
BACKGROUND:
Mayor Mendenhall proposes naming the Salt Lake City Justice Court after former Salt Lake City
Justice Court Judge John L. Baxter.
Naming city assets is addressed in City Code Chapter 3.65. Section 3.65.020 states that the naming
of major assets requires City Council approval, while the naming of minor assets requires only the
Mayor’s approval. A major asset includes a structure or facility, including a portion of structure or
facility. Under City Code, the Justice Court building is a major asset. The Council may choose to
approve the name change through legislative process or defer the approval to the Mayor’s Office.
Chapter 3.65 allows the Council 15 business days after receipt of this notice to determine whether
it wishes to use a legislative process for the naming of the Justice Court building. If, at the
conclusion of those 15 business days, the Council has not responded to this notice, the naming
decision and process reverts to the Mayor’s Office to use the minor asset approval process.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
Judge Baxter served Salt Lake City for over 20 years as a Justice Court Judge. Judge Baxter was dedicated to
serving some of the most traditionally underserved people in Salt Lake City, making sure that they were not
just processed through the justice system, but that they received the support they needed to be successful in
society.
Some of the highlights in Judge Baxter’s career include:
• Serving as Presiding Judge from July 2014 to 2019, and in that capacity acting as liaison from the
Court to the Office of the Mayor and the City Council. Also responsible for developing and
implementing policy at the Court.
• Developing and presiding over the Salt Lake Justice Homeless Court and the Salt Lake City Veterans’
Court. Additionally, he presided over the Salt Lake City Drug Court and the Salt Lake City Domestic
Violence Court.
• Training newly appointed District Court judges regarding interactions with self-represented parties
and training new Justice Court judges in criminal procedure.
• Working as a Trial Attorney for the Salt Lake Legal Defender Association, Salt Lake City, from 1997-
2002.
• Acting as Legal Defender Association liaison to the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympic Winter Games
safety committee and organizing and supervising public defender assignments during the Games.
• Participating as Legal Defender Association liaison in developing and implementing the Third
District Mental Health Court and serving as the public defender assigned to that court.
COMMITTEE POSITIONS
• 2003 – 2005 – Utah Judicial Council Committee on Privacy and Access to Public Court Records,
reviewing, developing and submitting to the Council recommendations for privacy and access to
court records.
• February 2004 to September 2013 – Supreme Court of Utah Advisory Committee on
Professionalism – Drafting and submitting to the Utah Supreme Court the Utah Standards of
Professionalism and Civility (for attorneys) and the Utah Standards of Judicial Professionalism and
Civility. Initiating review of attorneys applying to become mentors for new attorneys.
• 2005 – Present – Salt Lake County Criminal Justice Advisory Council – Developing and
implementing policies and procedures for appropriate jail use, developing community alternatives to
incarceration and exploring options for treatment and reintegration into the community of those
charged or convicted of crimes.
• February 2005 to February 2014 – Chair, Utah Judicial Council Committee on Access to Resources
for Self-Represented Parties – Developed and implemented a virtual Self-Help Center through the
Utah State Courts which presently receives thousands of calls, texts or emails per year for individuals
seeking legal guidance.
• 2005 – 2011 – Utah Judicial Council Committee on Judicial Outreach – Developing and supporting
efforts to engage the Judiciary with the public including Law Day activities and judge for a day
programs.
• 2011 – 2017 – Supreme Court of Utah Advisory Committee on the Rules of Civil Procedure –
Review and submit changes to the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure to the Utah Supreme Court.
• 2011 – 2013 – Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice Mental Health Initiative –
Investigate and expand mental health courts throughout the state.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
• 2013 – Present – Utah State Bar New Lawyer Training Program Committee – develop and review
training materials for new lawyers and contact and interviewing references for attorneys applying to
become new lawyer mentors.
• 2014 – 2017 – Utah Judicial Council Uniform Fine and Bail Committee – review and submit to the
Judicial Council any changes in fine and bail for the State of Utah.
PROFESSIONAL AWARDS
• 2004 – Salt Lake Area Domestic Violence Coalition Peace on Earth Award
• 2005 – Utah State Courts Quality of Justice Award
• 2011 – Salt Lake Area Domestic Violence Coalition Peace on Earth Award
• 2017 – Utah Minority Bar Association Jimi Mitsunaga Excellence in Criminal Law or Pro Bono
Award
• 2019 – Justice Court Service Award
• 2019 – Utah State Bar Judge of the Year
COMMUNITY TESTIMONIALS
Chief Justice Matthew Durrant: I’ve always looked to Judge Baxter as the perfect example of just how
much good a genuinely compassionate and concerned judge can do. Thank you, Judge Baxter, for your truly
extraordinary service.
Court of Appeals Judge Gregory Orme: I had recollected that John served with me on the Judicial Council
during my second stint on the Council, roughly 2010-2016. I recalled him as one of my favorites on the
Council during that time and one of our most important and influential members. He was not one to
dominate the meeting, but when he spoke, he always had such insightful and important things to say. Well, I
was mistaken. John was not actually on the Council as near as I can reconstruct. He may have filled in
occasionally for an absent justice court judge, but apparently he was just such a frequent presenter, both as
the long-time chair of our access to justice committee and in connection with his pioneering work on two of
our early problem-solving courts, that his regular participation with the Council during that time won him a
promotion to the Council, albeit only in my mind's eye.
I always enjoyed sitting by him and basking in his wisdom during lunch and breaks. He is truly among the
very finest judges I have known during my 35 years with the Utah judiciary.
District Judge Patrick Corum: When I was asked to write down a few things about John Baxter, I had no
idea how hard it would be. Because how can I put into just a few sentences how much and why I admire the
person who represented everything I always wanted to be as a public defender and everything I strive to be as
a judge? John was, and is, both.
First, John was an amazing attorney and mentor to an entire generation of public defenders. His compassion
for his clients, his charisma, and his skill made him a great trial lawyer. Truly, John absolutely commanded
the courtroom as a lawyer. I first met John over 20 years ago when he was the Misdemeanor Chief at LDA
and I was a brand new public defender. As a supervisor and mentor, John had no peers and he absolutely
inspired all of us to represent people with everything we had. I remember being called into his office after a
particularly contentious day in court because the city prosecutor was calling and literally screaming at him
about whatever it was that I had done. John listened calmy, put down the phone, smiled at me, and told me
to keep up the good work.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
Remembrances of John as a lawyer would be incomplete without some small mention of his court attire. He
had coat rack in the corner of his office that was full of some of the most hideous pattern and color
combinations known to humanity. On his way out the door to court, the jackets would be “matched” with
his equally abhorrent ties. He dressed like that, not because he was color blind (and I sincerely hope he is
because that would have partially shielded him from the horror that these jackets clearly were), but because
one particularly difficult and harsh judge absolutely loved the outfits. As soon as he came in the door, this
judge would interrupt whatever browbeating was being delivered to call John up in front of the packed
courtroom, make him turn around, and just delight in whatever combo he had chosen that day – in my
mind’s eye it is perhaps a green tie with little tabasco bottles on it with a red plaid jacket. John would then
call his cases and the judge would do whatever he asked for on behalf of his clients before going back to
yelling and sending everyone else’s clients to prison.
Second, John is a great judge. In addition to just being very good at the daily work of a judge, I think John
redefined what it is to be a judge. Ultimately, he was there to weigh facts and apply the law, but he also
brought a level of innovation, compassion, and understanding of people that was truly remarkable. John was
on the ground floor of nearly every type of specialty court that we have in this state. Mental Health Court,
Veteran’s Court, and Homeless Court all owe a large part of their existence and success to John’s hard work,
dedication, and courage to try new ideas. I have followed John my entire career. I followed him running the
viaduct legal clinic, as a misdemeanor chief at LDA, and to the bench. At each stop, I have tried to live up to
his example and hoped to become a fraction of what he was. Thank you for everything you have done for
all of us John!
Presiding Third District Justice Court Judge Brendan McCullagh: I have been in denial of John’s
retirement for several years. I will miss him personally, as he is a dear friend. But we collectively will miss him
more, as John has consistently over twenty years, provided us with clear-eyed, moral conscientious
leadership. I'm loud and brash, he just showed all of us by his example how all who appear before us are
entitled to respect, dignity and a chance to be heard.
Nick Mecham, CJAC Policies and Projects Coordinator: I first met Judge Baxter when my neighbors,
who were his parents, connected me with him as I was applying to law school. During my first year of law
school I pestered him enough that he took pity on me and offered me an opportunity to work in his
courtroom over the summer. I eagerly jumped at the opportunity. I’m happy I did because at that point in my
life, in my late 20s, I thought I’d made up my mind on what justice was and what it meant. Working and
interacting with Judge Baxter on a daily basis helped change my mind and reshape my value and
understanding of justice. Realizing that there were real people behind each decision was an invaluable
experience. His deft handling of the dynamic circumstances of his courtroom was a sight to behold. It was
great to watch the kindness with which he treated those whose lives had been touched by the criminal justice
system, maybe for the first time, maybe dozens of times, and the time he took to ensure that each person
understood what was happening and what they were doing. His kindness fostered respect and wasn’t to be
mistaken for weakness. He handled every situation I saw him come across with ease.
He gave me several opportunities to help in many different ways including in homeless court, drug court, and
in research of certain statutes and/or cases. He made me want to work hard for him and I could tell that his
crew felt the same way. He worked hard and his example made each of us want to work hard as well. I felt,
and still feel, that is a quality of a fantastic leader. His humility wouldn’t allow him to relish in accolades or
praise. I aspire to that type of humility. In the 14 years since then, probably much to his chagrin, I’ve
attempted to stay in contact with him and speak with him on a regular basis. I value his opinion and his
advice and I seek both. He is fun to talk to, easy to relate to, and just a genuinely good person. He is a mentor
to me of the highest value and I consider him a friend. I hope he considers me a friend as well and I aspire to
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
treat people the way he has always treated me and the way he’s treated those that have come into his
courtroom.
Kim Russo: I first met Judge Baxter after I was transferred to Operation Rio Grande in downtown Salt Lake
City. My office, along with the other agencies, were upstairs at the Weigand Center. I distinctly remember
after my first week, that the following Friday, Judge Baxter and his team arrived to conduct homeless court.
I was intrigued and stepped in to observe. Immediately, I was in awe of the work that the Court was doing
with our homeless population. Yet, even more affected by the way Judge Baxter dealt with the clients. He
was informative with them, letting them know of their rights, but he also showed empathy and compassion
for their difficult life circumstances.
I soon was able to work with Judge Baxter doing his assessments on the clients that the City Prosecutor
requested. What an honor this has been for me. I thank Judge Baxter for bringing me into the Court
program. I also want to thank him for teaching me the value of the human spirit. The value of each human
being and how precious life can be.
Kele Griffone, CJS: Judge Baxter, From your friends and colleagues at Salt Lake County Criminal Justice
Services, Happy Retirement. Your capacity to listen, passion for fairness, and dedication to our homeless
population has been an inspiration to those around you. Many clients have expressed how you treated them
with respect and they truly felt cared about when appearing before you.
Your ideas, advocation for better processes to serve the community, tell it like it is, and willingness to roll up
your sleeves and get things done has been valuable for the Criminal Justice Advisory Council. We need more
advocates and visionaries like you.
Comments made by clients in the homeless community concerning their experiences with Judge
Baxter:
----I remember walking into his court downtown, it was homeless court. He did not make me feel ashamed or
dumb because of my crime. Judge Baxter worked with me and found me community service so that I would
not have to pay a fine. I have no money. I worked in the pantry with Crossroads Urban Center. I made many
friends. But, Judge Baxter will always be my friend.
Willie
----I really think that I was tired laying in the street, so sick because I was coming down from my drug use. It
was homeless court, and I knew I just had to get in. Judge Baxter made a call, he had a lady call, and they got
me right in to a treatment center. I wanted to go. I have been sober for four years now thanks to Judge
Baxter.
Fred B.
----Judge Baxter gave me a real break, allowing me to do a assessment. I believe that’s what they call it. The
person doing the assessment, said I have good skills, and told mesome of the skills. I got job leads. I then told
Judge Baxter about my leads. I went to the next homeless court and told Judge Baxter I g ot a job. He got up
and shook my hand. Judge Baxter believes in me. I am keeping this job. In a month, I will have the deposit
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
ready and my first month’s rent. An apartment building accepted me. I thank Judge Baxter for believing in
me.
John L.
---Judge Baxter always stops and talks to me when he walks through the Weigand Center. He talks to me with
respect. He is a kind man who always remembers what I tell him. When I see him the next time, he
remembers what I told him and asks if things are getting better for me. He does care about people.
Marsha D.
---I was so sad to hear that Judge Baxter is retiring. I could always count on him. I don’t think anyone in my
life will ever be that nice to me. He never judged me because I was homeless. Someday, I won’t be homeless,
and I hope Judge Baxter will know that I got housing for me and in his honor. I am going to miss him.
Jesse V.
---I got my housing because Judge Baxter worked with me in court to look at my charges and figure out what
I could do to close those cases. I went to do my community service, came back when it was over, and Judge
Baxter connected me with housing. My voucher is active, and we think that my housing will come in August.
I am going to get a job to with Advantage. I couldn’t do this without Judge Baxter’s help.
Trisha W.
---Judge Baxter never judged me. I hear voices so much. He got me some help with people that I now trust.
But he never made fun of my voices, like most people do. Judge Baxter was my safe person in the world. I
just don’t want him to leave.
Carlos V.
Item F1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke
Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:December 13, 2022 UPDATED 3:18 PM
RE: $6 Million Deeply Affordable Housing Grant Awards
MOTION 1 – APPROVE RESOLUTION
I move that the Council approve a resolution adopting the deeply affordable housing grant awards
including a 50-year affordability term restrictive covenant at the Medically Vulnerable Housing and the
Point At Fairpark developments, and minimum ratios of about one staff to 25 clients not counting
security guards at all three developments.
Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the individual items being approved below; they are
listed for reference.
$2 Million to Medically Vulnerable Interim Housing with a 50-year affordability term deed restriction
$2 Million to Point At Fairpark with a 50-year affordability term deed restriction
$2 Million to the Ville 1659 with a 30-year affordability term deed restriction
MOTION 2 – NOT APPROVE
I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item.
1
RESOLUTION NO.________ OF 2022
Adopting funding allocations for the Homeless Housing Grant Fund
WHEREAS, On September 20, 2022, the Salt Lake City Council (“Council”) adopted an
ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2023 final budget of Salt Lake City (“City”) to transfer
6 million from a CIP holding account to the general fund to address immediate and long-term
homeless needs and the creation of a Homelessness Housing Grant Fund (“HHGF”);
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council determined that the HHGF is intended to provide a
subsidy for the construction, acquisition, or rehabilitation of new permanent supportive housing
or transition housing units;
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council further determined that the HHGF is intended to
provide a subsidy for projects that are scheduled to be complete by May 2023, when the winter
overflow shelters are scheduled to close for the season;
WHEREAS, between September 30 and October 14, 2022, the City accepted applications
for the HHGF through a competitive Notice of Funding Availability, with the resulting submittal
of five applications;
WHEREAS, on October 25, a committee was convened to review and recommend
approval to the Council the funding allocations noted on Exhibit A attached hereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as
follows:
1. That the Council hereby approves issuing the funding allocations outlined on
Exhibit B – Council Funding Allocations, with the requirement that the grant
proceeds shall be used to create new units of housing as detailed on the Exhibit.
2. That the Mayor, as the official representative of Salt Lake City, or her designee,
is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute the grant documents and any
other relevant documents consistent with Exhibit B, and incorporating such
other terms and agreements as recommended by the City Attorney’s office, and
to act in accordance with their terms.
The remainder of the page is intentionally left blank.]
2
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of ______________, 2022.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By _____________________________
Dan Dugan
CHAIR
Approved as to form: __________________________
Kimberly K. Chytraus
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: ___________________________
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Kimberly Chytraus (Dec 13, 2022 15:00 MST)
Dec 13, 2022
3
EXHIBIT “A”
HHGF Review Committee Recommendations
On October 25, 2022, the HHGF review committee (“Committee”), comprised of representatives
from Housing Stability, the Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board, and RDA convened to review
applications and make funding recommendations that will be forwarded to the Council. Based on
the Council’s intent established through the budget approval, the Committee considered the
following standards of review when considering funding recommendations:
Serve people currently experiencing homelessness in the City
Offer at least ~100 housing units of new permanent supportive housing (“PSH”) or
transition housing (“TH”)
Have a majority of units ready for occupancy on or before April 30, 2023, when the
winter overflow shelters close for the season
Have a majority of its funding from non-City sources
1 - ATKINSON STACKS
Applicant: Housing Assistance Management Experience (HAME)
Funding Request: $2,500,000
Address: 543 S 500 W
Funding Recommendation: $0
Project will not open on or near May 2023
2 - FIRST STEP HOUSE RECOVERY HOUSING
Applicant: First Step House
Address: 518 E 600 S
Funding Request: $1,900,000
Funding Recommendation: $0
Project does not have a majority of funding sources from non-City sources.
3 – MEDICALLY VULNERABLE PROJECT
Applicant: Shelter the Homeless, Inc
Address: Outside of municipal boundaries
Funding Request: $2,500,000
Funding Recommendation: $2,000,000
Recommended Conditions - to be established through a 50-year minimum deed
restriction or restrictive covenant:
The project shall provide transitional housing for medically vulnerable individuals that
are chronically homeless, homeless, and at-risk of becoming homeless.
Applicant shall develop and maintain a project with a minimum of 98 affordable housing
units that are restricted by rent and occupancy, as follows:
o Tenants must have an annual income that is 30% or below of the area median
income for Salt Lake City Utah, HUD Metro FMR Area as adjusted for household
size.
o Medically vulnerable individuals who have been homeless for the longest periods
of time or who demonstrate the highest vulnerability utilizing the VISPDAT
4
Vulnerability Index–Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool) or similar
assessment shall be given priority.
o Rent shall not exceed 30% of each tenant’s annual income. Tenants shall not be
required to pay rent if they do not have income.
Applicant shall ensure that prospective tenants have gone through the coordinated entry
process used by the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness to ensure
coordination and efficiency with the current homelessness services system.
Applicant shall enter any new resident into the Homeless Management Information
System (“HMIS”) coordinated entry system.
The project shall include supportive services, with a focus on medical services, to
stabilize residents and to enable residents to live as independently as possible.
The Applicant and operator will maintain a staff to client ratio of about 1 staff to 25
clients. Security guards may not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
Applicant shall work with residents to obtain suitable, permanent housing.
Applicant must submit annual compliance reports to the City. These reports shall
document the occupancy and show whether Applicant is in compliance with
requirements.
4 - POINT AT FAIRPARK
Applicant: Friends of Switchpoint, Inc
Address: 130 N 2100 W
Funding Request: $2,500,000
Funding Recommendation: $2,000,000
Recommended Conditions - to be established through a 50-year minimum deed
restriction or restrictive covenant:
The project shall provide housing for individuals that are chronically homeless, homeless,
and at-risk of becoming homeless.
Applicant shall develop and maintain a project with a minimum of 94 affordable housing
units that are restricted by rent and occupancy, as follows:
o Tenants must have an annual income that is 40% or below of the area median
income for Salt Lake City Utah, HUD Metro FMR Area as adjusted for household
size.
o Individuals who have been homeless for the longest periods of time or who
demonstrate the highest vulnerability utilizing the VISPDAT (Vulnerability
Index–Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool) or similar assessment
shall be given priority.
o Preference may be provided to veterans and seniors.
o The annualized rent per unit shall be set forth in a written lease and shall not
exceed, for the term of the lease, 30% of the annual income limit for individuals
and households with a maximum AMI of 40% AMI.
o If project-based vouchers are obtained, tenants shall pay no more than 30% of
their income toward rent.
Applicant shall ensure that prospective tenants have gone through the coordinated entry
process used by the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness to ensure
coordination and efficiency with the current homelessness services system.
5
Applicant shall enter any new resident into the Homeless Management Information
System (“HMIS”) coordinated entry system.
The project shall include supportive services to assist homeless persons in transitioning
from homelessness, and to promote the provision of supportive housing to enable
residents to live as independently as possible. Supportive services shall include on-site
case coordination or management that ensures tenants’ access to a wide variety of
services and on-site location of services provided by professional service providers.
The Applicant and the operator will maintain a staff to client ratio of about 1 staff to 25
clients. Security guards may not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
Applicant must submit annual compliance reports to the City. These reports shall
document the occupancy and show whether Applicant is in compliance with tenant
eligibility requirements.
5 - VILLE 1659
Applicant: Ville 1659 LLC
Address: 1659 W North Temple
Funding Request: $2,500,000
Funding Recommendation: $2,000,000
Recommended Conditions - to be established through a 30-year minimum deed
restriction or restrictive covenant:
The project shall provide housing for individuals that are chronically homeless, homeless,
and at-risk of becoming homeless.
Residual cashflow shall be recommitted to operations of the project.
Applicant shall develop and maintain a project with a minimum of 197 affordable
housing units that are restricted by rent and occupancy, as follows:
o Tenants must have an annual income that is 30% or below of the area median
income for Salt Lake City Utah, HUD Metro FMR Area as adjusted for household
size.
o Individuals who have been homeless for the longest periods of time or who
demonstrate the highest vulnerability utilizing the VISPDAT (Vulnerability
Index–Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool) or similar assessment are
given priority.
o The annualized rent per unit shall be set forth in a written lease and shall not
exceed the current Fair Market Rent as established by the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). The intent is to provide housing for
persons at or below 30% AMI who have a tenant-based housing voucher, thereby
tenants are paying no more than 30% of their income for housing.
o If project-based vouchers are obtained, tenants shall pay no more than 30% of
their income toward rent.
Applicant shall ensure that prospective tenants have gone through the coordinated entry
process used by the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness to ensure
coordination and efficiency with the current homelessness services system.
Applicant shall enter any new resident into the Homeless Management Information
System (“HMIS”) coordinated entry system.
The project shall include supportive services to assist homeless persons in transitioning
from homelessness, and to promote the provision of supportive housing to enable
6
residents to live as independently as possible. Supportive services shall include on-site
case coordination or management that ensures tenants’ access to a wide variety of
services and on-site location of services provided by professional service providers.
The Applicant and the operator will maintain a staff to client ratio of about 1 staff to 25
clients. Security guards may not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
Applicant must submit annual compliance reports to the City. These reports shall
document the occupancy and show whether Applicant is in compliance with tenant
eligibility requirements.
7
EXHIBIT “B”
HHGF Council Allocations
Approved as to Form - Resolution_HHGF
Allocations KNL 12.13.22
Final Audit Report 2022-12-13
Created:2022-12-13
By:Thais Stewart (thais.stewart@slcgov.com)
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAnVcXyoGFUBl3bOyFXU-4CPHJkx_bpQgt
Approved as to Form - Resolution_HHGF Allocations KNL 12.1
3.22" History
Document created by Thais Stewart (thais.stewart@slcgov.com)
2022-12-13 - 9:02:38 PM GMT
Document emailed to Kimberly Chytraus (kimberly.chytraus@slcgov.com) for signature
2022-12-13 - 9:03:46 PM GMT
Email viewed by Kimberly Chytraus (kimberly.chytraus@slcgov.com)
2022-12-13 - 10:00:02 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Kimberly Chytraus (kimberly.chytraus@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2022-12-13 - 10:00:12 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2022-12-13 - 10:00:12 PM GMT
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Office Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: October 28, 2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community and Neighborhoods (CAN)
__________________________
SUBJECT: Homeless Housing Grant Fund recommendations for $6 million that was
transferred from a CIP holding account to the general fund for the purpose of providing grants to
projects that address immediate and long-term homeless housing needs.
STAFF CONTACT: Tammy Hunsaker, Deputy Director, Community and Neighborhoods
801-535-7244, tammy.hunsaker@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution
RECOMMENDATION: Consideration of the attached resolution to approving funding
allocations for the Homeless Housing Grant Fund.
BUDGET IMPACT: N/A
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On September 20, 2022, the Salt Lake City Council
(“Council”) adopted an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2023 budget to transfer $6 million
from a CIP holding account to the general fund to address immediate and long-term homeless
needs and the creation of a Homelessness Housing Grant Fund (“HHGF”). The Administration
proposed to portion City funds for deeply affordable housing into two phases. The $6 million
adopted by Council is intended to be Phase I, to provide grants for permanent supportive housing
and/or transitional housing projects that will:
•Serve people currently experiencing homelessness in the City
•Offer at least ~100 housing units
Lisa Shaffer (Nov 1, 2022 16:04 MDT)11/01/2022
11/01/2022
• Have a majority of units ready for occupancy on or before April 2023, when the winter
overflow shelters close for the season
• Have a majority of its funding from non-City sources
The Phase I funding is intended to provide a crucial subsidy for housing that is the most difficult
to develop, utilized for the construction or acquisition/rehabilitation of new permanent
supportive housing (“PSH”) or transition housing (“TH”) units. Projects are intended to target
qualified low-income households that meet HUD’s definition of chronically homeless, are
otherwise assessed by the region’s coordinated entry system as the most vulnerable homeless
persons, or other populations with critical needs. Due to the limited cash flow generated by these
types of housing projects, funding may be provided as grants. Funding shall leverage various
other sources of local, state, and federal funds.
Since the Phase I funding is intended to focus on creation of units within the next 9 months to
align with the end of the winter overflow shelter season, it is expected that applicants will
include those renovating existing motels for permanent supportive or transitional housing
projects. It is anticipated that projects will have already begun work and need funds to continue
and/or finish construction.
In addition to the $6 million being issued through Phase I, other funds approved through the FY
2023 budget for housing are in various stages of administration by the Department of
Community and Neighborhoods (“CAN”) and the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
(“RDA”) for activities that support extremely low-income individuals and households. Projects
supported by these other funds are likely farther out in the development pipeline and may need
12-24 months to complete planning and construction. The goal is to coordinate funding and
resources to reduce the number of unsheltered homeless individuals and individuals staying in
emergency shelters.
HHGF Administration
CAN expedited the creation of a grant application for developers and non-profit organizations to
apply for a portion of the funding, not to exceed $2.5 million per applicant. A notice of funding
availability (“NOFA”) was released on September 30th and closed on October 14th. The NOFA
was posted on the Utah Public Procurement Place website and CAN’s website, and was
disbursed via email. A total of five applications were received, with a combined funding request
of $11,900,000. Refer to Exhibit A: HHGF Application & Project Summary for an overview of
the funding requests and corresponding projects. Also refer to Exhibit B: Financial Gap
Summary for an overview of the projects’ sources and uses.
HHGF Review Committee & Recommendations
A HHGF review committee (“Committee”), comprised of representatives from Housing
Stability, the Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board, and RDA was established to review
applications and make funding recommendations that will be forwarded to the Council.
Next Steps
Once the Council approves funding allocations, the Administration will work with the Attorney’s
Office to draft and execute grant documents and any other associated agreements. While funding
is ultimately intended to be provided as a grant, the Administration may require that funding be
disbursed through multiple draws and will be required to be repaid if the project does not meet
the intended long-term public benefits.
EXHIBITS:
A. HHGF Application & Project Summary
B. HHGF Financial Gap Summary
C. HHGF Resolution
1 - ATKINSON STACKS 2 - FIRST STEP HOUSE
RECOVERY HOUSING
3 - MEDICALLY
VULNERABLE INTERIM
HOUSING
4 - POINT AT FAIRPARK 5 - VILLE 1659
DEVELOPER/OPERATOR Housing Assistance Management
Experience (HAME)
First Step House (FSH)Shelter the Homeless, Inc (STH)Friends of Switchpoint, Inc Ville 1659 LLC
PROJECT COST $$29,890,890.00 $3,240,000.00 $19,000,000.00 $16,000,000.00 $18,250,000.00
FUNDING REQUEST $$2,500,000.00 $1,900,000.00 $2,500,000.00 $2,500,000.00 $2,500,000.00
CITY FUNDING PER UNIT 8%59%13%16%14%
NUMBER OF UNITS 114 16 98 94 197
ADDRESS 543 S 500 W, SLC 518 E 600 S, SLC Outside Municipal Boundaries 130 N 2100 W, SLC 1659 W N Temple St, SLC
COMPLIES WITH ZONING?Yes Yes No, in process No, in process Yes
COMPLETED BY MAY 2023? No Yes Yes Yes Yes
NUMBER OF UNITS 114 16 98 94 197
PROJECT-BASED VOUCHERS?114 No No No No
HOUSING TYPE Permanent Supportive Housing Permanent Supportive Housing Transitional Housing Permanent Supportive Housing Permanent Supportive Housing
POPULATIONS MOST CRITICALLY
IN NEED OF HOUSING
Individuals who are disabled,
Individuals experiencing
homelessness
Individuals who are disabled,
specifically, but not exclusively,
substance use disorder and co-
occurring mental health conditions.
Individuals experiencing
homelessness who are aging,
vulnerable, medically frail, in need
of recuperative care, and/or
underlying health condition
Literally homeless individuals over
62 years of age, Veterans living on
a fixed income
Chronically homeless, Veterans,
Victims of DV, Formerly
Incarcerated Individuals, Aging
Adults, Individuals at risk of
becoming or returning to
homelessness
ON-SITE SUPPORTIVE SERVICES Yes; Case Management, Physical
and Mental Health Support
Yes; Home Visits, Case
Management, Peer Support, and
Recovery Support Groups
Yes; Physical Health Support Yes; Case Management, Group
Classes, Physical and Mental
Health Support, Veteran Benefits
Yes; Case Management, Physical
and Mental Health Support,
Substance Abuse Support
Services
RENT STRUCTURE Project-based vouchers so
tenants will pay 30% of their
incomes for rent. Partnered with
Sacred Circle Health Care (SCHC)
who accepts referrals from
Community Triage Groups (CTG),
Veteran Community Triage (VCT),
and Veteran Support Team (VST)
for placement.
Most tenants will lack income and
be enrolled in SLCo Division of
Behavioral Health Services
(DBHS) Recovery Housing
Voucher Program which pays the
$800 in monthly rent for three
months; starting in month four,
residents are required to pay 30%
of income for rent. For without a
voucher, rent will be capped at no
more than 30% of their income.
This program targets support for
medically vulnerable individuals
transitioning from the homeless
resource centers or encampments
to interim housing as their best
long-term solutions are determined,
and does not plan for rental
income, neither with project-based
or tenant based vouchers, nor
Social Security Disability
Insurance.
Rents will be restricted to 40% AMI
and targeted to seniors and
veterans. Switchpoint participates
in the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to
End Homelessness (SLVCEH)
coordinated entry to identify
eligible residents and takes
referrals from Aging Services, the
VA, and street outreach.
Rents will be set at Fair Market
Rent (FMR), which is currently
~$1,000 for a studio. Ville 1659 will
work with SLVCEH and the service
provider community to house
individuals that already have a
voucher. Based on input from
SLVCEH, the VA Housing team,
and other providers, a "shortage" of
individuals with vouchers isn't
foreseen.
EXHIBIT A: HHGF APPLICATION & PROJECT SUMMARY
Utah Office Homeless Services $ 9,000,000 30%
SLC HHGF $ 2,500,000 8%
Other Unsecured $ 18,390,890 62%
TOTAL $ 29,890,890 100%
Hard/Soft Costs $ 27,390,890 92%
Developer Fee $ 2,500,000 8%
TOTAL $ 29,890,890 100%
Utah Recovery Housing Program 1,340,000$ 41%
SLC HHGF 1,900,000$ 59%
TOTAL 3,240,000$ 100%
Acquisition 2,400,000$ 74%
Hard/Soft Costs 640,000$ 20%
Developer Fee 200,000$ 6%
TOTAL 3,240,000$ 100%
State of Utah 3,500,000$ 19%
Salt Lake County 6,000,000$ 32%
SLC HHGF 2,500,000$ 13%
Other Unsecured 6,727,940$ 36%
TOTAL 18,727,940$ 100%
Acquisition (estimate)12,000,000$ 64%
Construction/Start-up 1,842,875$ 10%
Annual Property Management 1,049,928$ 6%
Medical Services/Case Management 816,515$ 4%
Operations/Client Services 3,018,622$ 16%
Developer Fee -$ 0%
TOTAL 18,727,940$ 100%
Utah Office Homeless Services $ 10,283,622 64%
Switchpoint Reserves $ 2,116,378 13%
SLC HHGF $ 2,500,000 16%
Other Unsecured $ 1,100,000 7%
TOTAL $ 16,000,000 100%
Acquisition $ 13,000,000 81%
Hard/Soft Costs $ 3,000,000 19%
Developer Fee $-0%
TOTAL 16,000,000$ 100%
Owner Equity $ 1,391,378 8%
Bank Loan $ 8,500,000 47%
Utah Office Homeless Services $ 3,858,622 21%
SLC HHGF $ 2,500,000 14%
Other Unsecured $ 2,000,000 11%
TOTAL $ 18,250,000 100%
Acquisition $ 12,000,000 66%
Hard/Soft Costs $ 5,250,000 29%
Developer Fee $ 1,000,000 5%
TOTAL $ 18,250,000 100%
EXHIBIT B: HHGF FINANCIAL GAP SUMMARY
1 - ATKINSON STACKS
3 - MEDICALLY VULNERABLE
SO
U
R
C
E
S
US
E
S
SO
U
R
C
E
S
US
E
S
SO
U
R
C
E
S
US
E
S
2 - FIRST STEP HOUSE RECOVERY HOUSING
NOTE: ORANGE indicates a funding source that is not secured.
NOTE: PURPLE indicates the HHGF funding request currently being evaluated.
SO
U
R
C
E
S
US
E
S
4 - POINT AT FAIRPARK
SO
U
R
C
E
S
US
E
S
5 - VILLE 1659
1
RESOLUTION NO.________ OF 2022
Adopting funding allocations for the Homeless Housing Grant Fund
WHEREAS, On September 20, 2022, the Salt Lake City Council (“Council”) adopted an
ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2023 final budget of Salt Lake City (“City”) to transfer
$6 million from a CIP holding account to the general fund to address immediate and long-term
homeless needs and the creation of a Homelessness Housing Grant Fund (“HHGF”);
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council determined that the HHGF is intended to provide a
subsidy for the construction, acquisition, or rehabilitation of new permanent supportive housing
or transition housing units;
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council further determined that the HHGF is intended to
provide a subsidy for projects that are scheduled to be complete by May 2023, when the winter
overflow shelters are scheduled to close for the season;
WHEREAS, between September 30 and October 14, 2022, the City accepted applications
for the HHGF through a competitive Notice of Funding Availability, with the resulting submittal
of five applications;
WHEREAS, on October 25, a committee was convened to review and recommend
approval to the Council the funding allocations noted on Exhibit A attached hereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as
follows:
1. That the Council hereby approves issuing the funding allocations outlined on
Exhibit B – Council Funding Allocations, with the requirement that the grant
proceeds shall be used to create new units of housing as detailed on the Exhibit.
2. That the Mayor, as the official representative of Salt Lake City, or her designee,
is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute the grant documents and any
other relevant documents consistent with Exhibit B, and incorporating such
other terms and agreements as recommended by the City Attorney’s office, and
to act in accordance with their terms.
[The remainder of the page is intentionally left blank.]
2
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of ______________, 2022.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By _____________________________
Dan Dugan
CHAIR
Approved as to form: __________________________
Kimberly K. Chytraus
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: ___________________________
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY RECORDER
October 31, 2022
3
EXHIBIT “A”
HHGF Review Committee Recommendations
On October 25, 2022, the HHGF review committee (“Committee”), comprised of representatives
from Housing Stability, the Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board, and RDA convened to review
applications and make funding recommendations that will be forwarded to the Council. Based on
the Council’s intent established through the budget approval, the Committee considered the
following standards of review when considering funding recommendations:
• Serve people currently experiencing homelessness in the City
• Offer at least ~100 housing units of new permanent supportive housing (“PSH”) or
transition housing (“TH”)
• Have a majority of units ready for occupancy on or before April 30, 2023, when the
winter overflow shelters close for the season
• Have a majority of its funding from non-City sources
1 - ATKINSON STACKS
Applicant: Housing Assistance Management Experience (HAME)
Funding Request: $2,500,000
Address: 543 S 500 W
Funding Recommendation: $0
*Project will not open on or near May 2023
2 - FIRST STEP HOUSE RECOVERY HOUSING
Applicant: First Step House
Address: 518 E 600 S
Funding Request: $2,500,000
Funding Recommendation: $0
*Project does not have a majority of funding sources from non-City sources.
3 – MEDICALLY VULNERABLE PROJECT
Applicant: Shelter the Homeless, Inc
Address: Outside of municipal boundaries
Funding Request: $2,500,000
Funding Recommendation: $2,000,000
Recommended Conditions - to be established through a 30-year minimum deed
restriction or restrictive covenant:
• The project shall provide transitional housing for medically vulnerable individuals that
are chronically homeless, homeless, and at-risk of becoming homeless.
• Applicant shall develop and maintain a project with a minimum of 98 affordable housing
units that are restricted by rent and occupancy, as follows:
o Tenants must have an annual income that is 30% or below of the area median
income for Salt Lake City Utah, HUD Metro FMR Area as adjusted for household
size.
o Medically vulnerable individuals who have been homeless for the longest periods
of time or who demonstrate the highest vulnerability utilizing the VISPDAT
4
(Vulnerability Index–Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool) or similar
assessment shall be given priority.
o Rent shall not exceed 30% of each tenant’s annual income. Tenants shall not be
required to pay rent if they do not have income.
• Applicant shall ensure that prospective tenants have gone through the coordinated entry
process used by the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness to ensure
coordination and efficiency with the current homelessness services system.
• Applicant shall enter any new resident into the Homeless Management Information
System (“HMIS”) coordinated entry system.
• The project shall include supportive services, with a focus on medical services, to
stabilize residents and to enable residents to live as independently as possible.
• Applicant shall work with residents to obtain suitable, permanent housing.
• Applicant must submit annual compliance reports to the City. These reports shall
document the occupancy and show whether Applicant is in compliance with
requirements.
4 - POINT AT FAIRPARK
Applicant: Friends of Switchpoint, Inc
Address: 130 N 2100 W
Funding Request: $2,500,000
Funding Recommendation: $2,000,000
Recommended Conditions - to be established through a 30-year minimum deed
restriction or restrictive covenant:
• The project shall provide housing for individuals that are chronically homeless, homeless,
and at-risk of becoming homeless.
• Applicant shall develop and maintain a project with a minimum of 94 affordable housing
units that are restricted by rent and occupancy, as follows:
o Tenants must have an annual income that is 40% or below of the area median
income for Salt Lake City Utah, HUD Metro FMR Area as adjusted for household
size.
o Individuals who have been homeless for the longest periods of time or who
demonstrate the highest vulnerability utilizing the VISPDAT (Vulnerability
Index–Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool) or similar assessment
shall be given priority.
o Preference may be provided to veterans and seniors.
o The annualized rent per unit shall be set forth in a written lease and shall not
exceed, for the term of the lease, 30% of the annual income limit for individuals
and households with a maximum AMI of 40% AMI.
o If project-based vouchers are obtained, tenants shall pay no more than 30% of
their income toward rent.
• Applicant shall ensure that prospective tenants have gone through the coordinated entry
process used by the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness to ensure
coordination and efficiency with the current homelessness services system.
• Applicant shall enter any new resident into the Homeless Management Information
System (“HMIS”) coordinated entry system.
5
• The project shall include supportive services to assist homeless persons in transitioning
from homelessness, and to promote the provision of supportive housing to enable
residents to live as independently as possible. Supportive services shall include on-site
case coordination or management that ensures tenants’ access to a wide variety of
services and on-site location of services provided by professional service providers.
• Applicant must submit annual compliance reports to the City. These reports shall
document the occupancy and show whether Applicant is in compliance with tenant
eligibility requirements.
5 - VILLE 1659
Applicant: Ville 1659 LLC
Address: 1659 W North Temple
Funding Request: $2,500,000
Funding Recommendation: $2,000,000
Recommended Conditions - to be established through a 30-year minimum deed
restriction or restrictive covenant:
• The project shall provide housing for individuals that are chronically homeless, homeless,
and at-risk of becoming homeless.
• Residual cashflow shall be recommitted to operations of the project.
• Applicant shall develop and maintain a project with a minimum of 197 affordable
housing units that are restricted by rent and occupancy, as follows:
o Tenants must have an annual income that is 30% or below of the area median
income for Salt Lake City Utah, HUD Metro FMR Area as adjusted for household
size.
o Individuals who have been homeless for the longest periods of time or who
demonstrate the highest vulnerability utilizing the VISPDAT (Vulnerability
Index–Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool) or similar assessment are
given priority.
o The annualized rent per unit shall be set forth in a written lease and shall not
exceed the current Fair Market Rent as established by the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). The intent is to provide housing for
persons at or below 30% AMI who have a tenant-based housing voucher, thereby
tenants are paying no more than 30% of their income for housing.
o If project-based vouchers are obtained, tenants shall pay no more than 30% of
their income toward rent.
• Applicant shall ensure that prospective tenants have gone through the coordinated entry
process used by the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness to ensure
coordination and efficiency with the current homelessness services system.
• Applicant shall enter any new resident into the Homeless Management Information
System (“HMIS”) coordinated entry system.
• The project shall include supportive services to assist homeless persons in transitioning
from homelessness, and to promote the provision of supportive housing to enable
residents to live as independently as possible. Supportive services shall include on-site
case coordination or management that ensures tenants’ access to a wide variety of
services and on-site location of services provided by professional service providers.
6
• Applicant must submit annual compliance reports to the City. These reports shall
document the occupancy and show whether Applicant is in compliance with tenant
eligibility requirements.
7
EXHIBIT “B”
HHGF Council Allocations
MARY BETH THOMPSON
Chief Financial Officer
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 245
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114 TEL 801-535-6403
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
_______________________________ Date Received: __________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _____________
TO: Salt Lake City Council
Dan Dugan, Chair
DATE: December 7, 2022
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer ________________________________
SUBJECT: Council Consent Agenda #6 Items Fiscal Year 2022-23
STAFF CONTACTS: Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 or
John Vuyk, Budget Director (801) 535-6394
DOCUMENT TYPE: Consent Agenda/Establish Grant Projects from Grant Holding Account
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that the City Council consent to the transfer
of these grants and donations from the holding account and establish a
project budget for them.
BUDGET IMPACT: Grant Holding Account ($ 24,170.00)
New Grant Project 24,170.00
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The grant holding account was established to fund grants between
budget amendments with the understanding that the grants would be submitted as part of the next
budget opening. Items transmitted are placed on a Council Consent agenda and then formally
approved during the following budget amendment. On occasion, a similar process is employed for
donations to the City.
Where necessary, resolutions were previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept these
grants and donations.
EXHIBITS: Consent Agenda Detail
Consent Agenda Summary
12/07/2022
12/07/2022
Lisa Shaffer (Dec 7, 2022 15:34 MST)
1
Section G: Council Consent Agenda – Grant Awards
G-1: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services
(COPS), FY22 Community Police Development (CPD) Grant
Misc. Grants
$24,170.00
Department: Police Department
Prepared By: Jordan Smith/Ann Garcia
The police department applied for and received a $24,170 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented
Policing Services through the FY22 Community Policing Development Grant.
The grant will fund an evaluation for the Promising Youth Project. The project will fund training and curriculum
recommended by the evaluation contractor. The Police Department will develop an evaluation that will provide four major
services: Evaluation of Program Fidelity, Evaluation of Program Ou tcomes, Training and Technical Assistance, and
development of a Final Report.
A Public Hearing was held on 07/19/2022 for the grant application on this award.
Fund Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs
1 U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), FY22
Community Police Development (CPD) Grant Misc Grants 24,170.00 One Time 0
Total of Budget Amendment Items 0.00 24,170.00 0
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Consent Agenda #6
Initiative Number/Name
Section G: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Awards
Section I: Council Added Items
Signature:
Email:
Alejandro Sanchez (Dec 7, 2022 15:20 MST)
Alejandro Sanchez
alejandro.sanchez@slcgov.com
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 10/28/2022
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 10/28/2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 10/28/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Arts Council Board
STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson
April.Patterson@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Arts Council Board
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Kate Jarman Gates as a member
of Arts Council Board.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
October 28, 2022
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Dugan,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to Arts Council.
Kate Jarman Gates to be appointed for a three year term, ending three years from starting from
the date of City Council advice and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 11/23/2022
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 11/23/2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 11/23/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Bicycle Advisory Committee
STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson
April.Patterson@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Bicycle Advisory Committee
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Ben Trueman as a member of
the Bicycle Advisory Committee.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
November 23, 2022
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Dugan,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Bicycle Advisory
Committee.
Ben Trueman to be appointed for a three year term, starting from the date of City Council advice
and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 11/23/2022
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 11/23/2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 11/23/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Bicycle Advisory Committee
STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson
April.Patterson@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Bicycle Advisory Committee
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Laura Lewis as a member of the
Bicycle Advisory Committee.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
November 23, 2022
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Dugan,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Bicycle Advisory
Committee.
Laura Lewis to be appointed for a three year term, starting from the date of City Council advice and
consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 11/23/2022
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 11/23/2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 11/23/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Bicycle Advisory Committee
STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson
April.Patterson@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Bicycle Advisory Committee
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Maxwell McLeod as a member
of the Bicycle Advisory Committee.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
November 23, 2022
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Dugan,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Bicycle Advisory
Committee.
Maxwell McLeod to be appointed for a three year term, starting from the date of City Council
advice and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 10/31/2022
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 10/31/2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 10/31/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Historic Landmark Commission
STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson
April.Patterson@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Historic Landmark
Commission
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Emoli Kearns as a member of
Historic Landmark Commission
.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
October 31, 2022
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Dugan,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to Historic Landmark
Commission.
Emoli Kearns to be appointed for a four year term, ending four years from starting from the date of
City Council advice and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 11/28/2022
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 11/28/2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 11/28/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Re-Appointment Recommendation: Bicycle Advisory Committee
STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson
April.Patterson@slcgov.com
Board Re-Appointment Recommendation: Bicycle Advisory DOCUMENT TYPE:
Committee
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and re-appoint Martin Cuma as a member of
the Bicycle Advisory Committee.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
November 28, 2022
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Dugan,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership re-appointment to the Bicycle Advisory
Committee.
Martin Cuma to be re-appointed for a three year term, starting from the date of City Council
advice and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 11/23/2022
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 11/23/2022
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 11/23/2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Re-Appointment Recommendation: Board of Appeals and Examiners
April Patterson
April.Patterson@slcgov.com
Board Appointment Recommendation: Board of Appeals and
STAFF CONTACT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
Examiners
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and re-appoint Beverly A. Langue as a
member of the Board of Appeals and Examiners.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
November 23, 2022
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Dugan,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership re-appointment to the Board of Appeals
and Examiners.
Beverly A. Langue to be re-appointed for a four year term, ending on Monday, December 28,
2026.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this re-appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
1
Barney, Michelle
From:Wharton, Chris
Sent:Thursday, December 15, 2022 5:01 PM
To:Trishman, Cindy Lou
Cc:Barney, Michelle; Parks, Dustin
Subject:Re: Written Comments - Ivory Rezone
Hi Cindy Lou,
Here is a written version of my comments from Tuesday’s meeting:
Our first duty as elected officials is to look out for the health, safety, and welfare of our residents.
We have an ordinance, City Code 21A.36.020B, that establishes a certain standard for retaining
walls inside and backyards with steps that go four feet high and three feet deep. That ordinance is
in place not only for the integrity of the walls but also to give clearance in the event of collapse
and to reduce the danger of people (most likely children) falling from a sheer drop off. This
ordinance has been the standard for properties around the city and was in place long before the
applicant acquired this property.
There is a 50‐foot grade change from the highest corner of the lot to the lowest. The applicant
estimates that building the retaining wall under the City’s existing standard would likely impact
four or five of the 19 principal dwellings.
Reducing the buildable area of four of five properties in a multimillion‐dollar development is very
reasonable request and it would do a lot to ease the valid safety concerns raised by residents in
the area.
The Planning Commission saw the need for a 25‐foot setback to address privacy concerns on the
western boarder of the property. The applicant has agreed to incorporate that recommendation
into their plans. Surely a similar 25‐foot setback on the northern portion, for the sake of safety,
can also be accommodated.
Some have suggested that ensuring the existing City Code is followed is more about limiting
density than ensuring safety. I would argue that exceptions to the existing code requirements
should only be for cases where the foot‐foot by three‐foot step requirements are not possible or
don’t make sense, not to accommodate homes 2‐3 times larger than a typical SR‐1 home at an
estimated cost of $400 per square foot. It’s not an issue of retaining walls versus 4‐5 additional
dwellings of density. It’s an issue of profitability.
Just a few hundred feet away from this property, on the very same road, there are properties
whose retaining walls—which were not built to the city’s established standard—have failed,
spilling tons of rocks, dirt, and building blocks into the only access road connecting these houses
2
to the rest of the neighborhood. Presumably, these walls were also designed by licensed
engineers and thoroughly reviewed by the City, just as we’ve been promised today.
I’m not suggesting that retaining walls that follow the four‐foot by three‐foot step requirement
are infallible or that retaining walls built without these specifications are doomed to collapse.
What I am suggesting is that it is our duty to reduce risks to safety and wellbeing, especially when
we know the risks.
In the five years I have been on the City Council, there have been three wildfires in this area of my
district. Last year, there was a major mudslide. The year before that, an earthquake. When those
events happen again—and they will—we should not be willing to risk blocking the only access
road to these residents. We should not be willing to risk rocks, walls, asphalt, and cars collapsing
from above and sliding directly into someone’s home.
When the metal framing on the previous project at 255 State Street proved to be unsound, we
stopped that project at great costs to taxpayers and private investors. A few months ago, when
we debated The Other Side Village, we built in measures to scrutinize the remediation plans for
the old adjoining landfill all at the expense of the developer. We do this because when a private
developer comes to the table asking for funding or a change in the law, we must consider the
public interest in their request.
Yes, we are in a housing crisis. Yes, there are historic inequities that we must work to rectify in
every neighborhood. But we must not be so quick to address one crisis that we risk creating
another. Our duty to the health, safety, and welfare of residents compels us to take reasonable
steps to reduce the risks this proposal presents, even if it means a few smaller units and,
ultimately, a slightly smaller profit margin.
CHRIS WHARTON
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCILMEMBER
DISTRICT THREE
(HE/HIM/HIS)
Sign up for my Newsletter!
CITY & COUNTY BUILDING
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114
DIRECT: 801‐535‐7726
CELL: 801‐910‐6795
WWW.SLCDISTRICT3.COM
3
From: "Trishman, Cindy Lou" <Cindy.Trishman@slcgov.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 9:41 AM
To: "Wharton, Chris" <Chris.Wharton@slcgov.com>
Cc: "Barney, Michelle" <Michelle.Barney@slcgov.com>
Subject: Written Comments ‐ Ivory Rezone
Council Member Wharton,
I meant to check in with you last night, as it seemed you were reading comments to the Ivory Rezone and the
vote. If your prepared comments exist in a document, note, or email it would be helpful for the record if we
could include them with the materials. It is optional for you to provide them, but it does assist with the record
clarity. If you are interested in including the direct comments, please reply to this email and Michelle will build
the summary for the minutes and attach the prepared comments to the meeting materials record.
Thank you.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
Salt Lake City Recorder
RECORDER’S OFFICE
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
801.535.6223
801.859.8873 (cell)