Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03/07/2023 - Work Session - Meeting Materials
'k tt** e ###t Af # ts #4 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WORK SESSION March 7, 2023 Tuesday 2:00 PM Council Work Room 451 South State Street Room 326 Salt Lake City,UT 84111 SLC'Council,com 7:00 pm Formal Meeting Room 326 (See separate agenda) Welcome and public meeting rules In accordance with State Statute and City Ordinance,the meeting may be held electronically.After 5:00 P.m.,please enter the City&County Building through the main east entrance. The Work Session is a discussion among Council Members and select presenters.The public is welcome to listen.Items scheduled on the Work Session or Formal Meeting may be moved and/or discussed during a different portion of the Meeting based on circumstance or availability of speakers. The Website addresses listed on the agenda may not be available after the Council votes on the item.Not all agenda items will have a webpage for additional information read associated agenda paperwork. Generated: 09:41:38 Note:Dates not identified in the project timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined.Item start times and durations are approximate and are subject to change. Work Session Items 1. Informational: Updates from the Administration 2:00 p.m. 15 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts, and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action- n/a 2. Informational: Equity Update 2:15 p.m. 20 min. The Council will hold a discussion about various initiatives led by the City's Office of Equity and Inclusion.These initiatives include,but are not limited to,improving racial equity and justice in policing. Discussion may also include updates on the City's other work to achieve equitable service delivery, decision-making, and community engagement through the Citywide Equity Plan,increased ADA resources,language access, and other topics addressed in the ongoing work of the Human Rights Commission and the Racial Equity in Policing Commission. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-n/a 3. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 865 South Soo East �'35 p'm' 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning of property at 865 South Soo East Street from RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential District)to CN(Neighborhood Commercial District),this would also amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map. The intent of the rezone request is to allow for the conversion of the existing single-family dwelling on the property to a commercial use. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.The property is located within Council District 5. Petitioner: Rick Service. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date- Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,March 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,April 4, 2023 4. Ordinance:Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)Text Amendment Follow-up 2 55 P m 30 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about a proposal that would amend various sections of the Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) regulations.The proposed code revisions would eliminate the conditional use requirement for detached ADUs in single-family residential zones.They would also aim to lower zoning barriers to construction of ADUs in general. The proposed changes would seek to strike a better balance between encouraging construction of ADUs and mitigating impacts to neighboring properties. For more information on this item visit http:f/tiiivui�l,com/ADU'FextAineiidmelit FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,January 17, 2023; Tuesday, February 7, 2023; and Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date- Tuesday,January 17, 2023 and Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, February 7, 2023 and Tuesday, March 21,2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday, March 21, 2023 5. Ordinance: Glendale Regional Park Plan — 3:25 P.m. 30 min The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would adopt the Glendale Regional Park Plan to be part of the City's general plan as a specific plan found in the Westside Master Plan. The Public Lands Department has been working with a consultant, Design Workshop,to develop a plan to guide development of the 17-acre Glendale Regional Park site,formerly known as Raging Waters. For more information on this item visit littps://tinyLirl.coiii/GlenclaICRegioliall3ark FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date- Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 7 P.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,March 21, 2023 6. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 3:55 p.m. 40 min. The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City's budgets,including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding for more repairs to City Hall from the March 2020 Earthquake,upgrades to public safety radio systems, Police Officer recruitment and retention bonuses, and additional emergency rental assistance among other items. For more information on this item visit littps-,//tiiivtti,].com/SI,CFY23 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date- Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 7 P.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday, March 21, 2023 7. Tentative Break ~ 4:35 P.m. 20 min. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-n/a Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action- n/a $. Resolution: $3.5 Million One-time HOME-ARPA Grant 5 25 p.m. Funding 30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a resolution that would authorize grant funding to selected applicants.As part of the American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA),the City received $3.5 million from the U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department or HUD.The one-time grant funding for the HOME program is designated for housing opportunities to help individuals experiencing or at risk of homelessness and domestic violence survivors.There are several steps required by HUD for the City to accept and be able to use the funding including a community assessment, allocation plan, and amending the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date- Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,March 21, 2023 9. Ordinance: Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Awards Follow-up 4 55 P m 15 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about an ordinance that would approve the disbursement of local business assistance grant awards from the City's American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA)fiscal recovery funds.A business needs to show an economic hardship caused by the pandemic and meet other federal requirements to be eligible for these ARPA grants. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, February 21, 2023 and Tuesday March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 or Tuesday,March 21, 2023 lo. Board Appointment:Arts Council — Hannah Nielsen 5:40 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Hannah Nielsen prior to considering appointment to the Arts Council for a term ending March 7, 2026. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 11. Board Appointment: Human Rights Commission— Pamela Silberman 5:45 P•m- 5 min The Council will interview Pamela Silberman prior to considering appointment to the Human Rights Commission for a term ending December 27, 2027. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,March 7, 2023 12. Board Appointment: Human Rights Commission—Will Terry 5:50 P.M. 5 min The Council will interview Will Terry prior to considering appointment to the Human Rights Commission for a term ending December 27, 2027. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Standing Items 13. Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. 14. Report and Announcements from the Executive Director - Report of the Executive Director,including a review of Council information items and announcements.The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items. 15. Tentative Closed Session - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session.A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including,but not limited to: a. discussion of the character,professional competence,or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase,exchange,or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares,if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if: (i)public discussion of the transaction would: (A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code§ 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 5:00 P.m. on Thursday,March 2, 2023,the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was(1)posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and(2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. CINDY LOU TRISHMAN SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda,including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City&County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation,which may include alternate formats,interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance.To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600,or relay service 711. Administrative odates March 7, 2023 e. t� �' 1 • 'e*y Orr Aw Jr* 4,. 1 a WWW. S I Lc . Loav/fe e d b a c k/ Regularly updated with highlighted ways to engage with the City. • Housing SLC • Draft plan is live ! • www.sl /housing-slc • Ending Aprill6th • Affordable Housing Incentives • Snowstorm pushed PC agenda to 3/22 • Virginia Street Reconstruction • Final roadway design and engagement summary is public • Engineering taking project and finalizing designs • GACC will be updated • Project to begin spring of 2024 Community Office Hours IEZEEEEEEEEI=II== The Neighborhood Hive - 2065 E 2100 S March 7 2-4pm Mestizo Coffeehouse — 631 W. North Temple March 8 9-11am Utah State Fairpark (Westside Coalition) - 155 N 1000 W. March 9 6-8pm Santo Taco - 380 S State March 14 4-6pm Corner Bakery Cafe - 610 Foothill Dr. March 20 11-1pm Maven Create — 177 E 900 S #200 March 28 12-2pm HRC / Winter Overflow Utilization • Feb 27- Mar 3 91.6% Rapid Intervention/ EIM • 2 Scheduled (weather dependent) 0 33 HEART-tracked camps 0 RIT locations: • VOA Outreach Engagement-, 9 • RIT Site Rehabilitations: 9 (+ 15) Next Resource Fair: March 10th 9-030- 12-430 @ Fairmont Park Operation Homeless Connect: March 24 • State Homelessness Mitigation Fund increased by 'v $5M • SLC anticipates receiving additional funds • Requires enforcement of no camp ing ordinances when no emergency shelter beds are available • Winter Response Task Force • March 30-.- Budget, Bed #s, Scope of plan requirements established • Aug 1: Plan submission to State OHS (2 weeks to reply) • Code Blue Protocols (< 15 degrees situations) • 2024-25 Winter Response Plans for Davis & Utah Counties COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ������ ��•i��i CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CPTY rn= "Briefing: ch 7,2023 TO: City Council Members rch�7, 2023 ng: March 21,2023 FROM• Brian Fullmer ion:April 4, 2023 Policy Analyst DATE: March 7,2023 RE: 865 South Soo East Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendment PLNPCM2022-003ol and PLNPCM2022-000302 The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the zoning map for a parcel at 865 South Soo East in City Council District Five from its current RMF-30 (Residential Multi-family)zoning designation to CN (Neighborhood Commercial).Additionally,the proposal calls for amending the Central Community Master Plan future land use map from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial.The petitioner's stated objective is to convert the single-family residence to an unspecified commercial use. The property is located in the Central City Local Historic District and the house is listed as a contributing structure,which protects it from demolition without Historic Landmark Commission approval. Furthermore, a certificate of appropriateness would be required for any modifications whether the zoning designation is changed or remains the same.The house is currently used as a rental property. If approved by the Council,the amendments would result in the loss of one housing unit.A housing loss mitigation report for this property is found on pages 46-50 of the Planning Commission staff report.The petitioner opted to pay the approximately$62,000 difference between current market value of the house and replacement housing costs,provided the Council approves his requests. It should be noted the City Attorney's Office mentioned the status of the City's housing loss mitigation program is pending adoption of the City's new Thriving in Place housing initiatives. The Historic Landmark Commission reviewed the proposal at its October 6, 2022 meeting.The Commission felt conversion to a commercial use could be acceptable depending on modifications to the building. Commissioners also expressed concern about setting a precedent of converting low-density residential to commercial uses in the Central City Historic District. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY.UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 i�a Comments about the proposal received by Planning staff were mixed.Those expressing support cited increased walkability and neighborhood vibrancy from a new commercial business.Those opposed were primarily concerned with increased on-street parking,privacy, noise, and preserving the historic integrity of the building. The Planning Commission reviewed these proposals at its October 26, 2022 meeting and held a public hearing. Four people spoke at the hearing or had their comments read into the record.Three were opposed citing resident displacement,housing shortage,preservation of the historic district and neighborhood character, and parking issues. One person shared concern about additional commercial parking in the area but did not express strong support or opposition. Planning staff recommended the Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation to the City Council stating their opinion the request does not meet applicable standards of approval.The Commission voted 5-3 to forward a positive recommendation.Those opposed did not state why the voted against the motion. RMF-3 0 SR-3 RMF-30 RMF-30 RMF-30 RMF-30 RMF-30 RMF-45 Rg CN CN RMF-45 CN RMF-30 CB CN RB CN OS R-1-5000 R-1-5000 R-1-5000 Area zoning map with subject parcel outlined in blue.Note-the green area to the south is Liberty Park. Goal of the briefing:Review the proposed zoning and future land use map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. Does the Council wish to discuss the tradeoff of creating additional commercial space in this area at the expense of losing a residential unit? 2. Does the Council feel additional commercial space in this area of the city could benefit the community? 3. The Council may wish to ask more about the Housing Loss Mitigation fee and the status of collecting the fees while the ordinance amendments are pending. Page 1 2 4. The Council may wish to ask if current residents of the property will be assisted with relocation. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The City zoning ordinance(21A.26.020.E)limits the maximum area of a continuously mapped CN (Neighborhood Commercial)district to go,000 square feet. Combining the abutting parcels currently zoned CN with the subject parcel would total less than 30,000 square feet,roughly one third of the maximum allowed area. The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property and amending the Central Community Master Plan future land use map.No formal site plan has been submitted to the City nor is it within the scope of the Council's authority to review the plans. Because zoning of a property can outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the zoning of that property,not simply based on a potential project. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified four key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 6-14 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis,please see the staff report. Consideration i-Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning The subject parcel is near the northeast corner of 500 East and goo South.Abutting properties to the south are a restaurant, and butcher shop, also owned by the petitioner.A single-family dwelling is also abutting to the south.All three of these parcels are zoned CN. Liberty Park is located nearby to the south, across goo South. One of the largest structures in the area,a 70-unit apartment building,is directly west across 50o East. That property is zoned RMF-45(Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential). Properties to the east, north, and northwest are zoned RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential) as shown in the area zoning map above.Those structures are primarily single-or two-family, and small multi-family dwellings. The goo South corridor in this area includes properties zoned CN, RB(Residential Business), and RMF-30. Most land uses are low-scale commercial and residential. Planning staff noted if approved by the Council, the subject property would be the first interior of a block intersecting goo South to be zoned as a non- residential district. Consideration 2-Contributing Status of Existing Building As noted above,the existing home on this property is listed as a contributing structure in the Central City Local Historic District. Because of this it is unlikely demolition would be approved. Exterior modifications or additions would need to be approved by the Historic Landmark Commission or Planning staff.The petitioner stated he plans to adaptively reuse the building for commercial use,though no specifics have been provided as of the writing of this report. Consideration 3-How the Proposal Helps Implement City Goals and Policies Identified in Adopted Plans Planning staff reviewed how the proposed zoning map and future land use map amendments align with the following City plans: • Plan Salt Lake(2015) • Central Community Master Plan(2005) • Salt Lake City Community Preservation Plan(2012) Page 13 • Growing SLC(2017) They determined the proposals are consistent with the following found in the plans. • Encourage and support local businesses and neighborhood business districts. • Reduce automobile dependency and single occupancy vehicle trips. • Support the growth of small businesses,entrepreneurship,and neighborhood business nodes. • Support modification of existing historic resources to allow for changes in use that will encourage the use of the structure for housing or other appropriate uses in historic districts to ensure preservation of the structure. • Adaptive reuse of historic structures should be allowed for a variety of uses in appropriate locations where it is found that the negative impacts can be mitigated and where the uses do not require significant alterations to the historic integrity of the interior of the structure. • Provide for small-scale commercial uses that can be located within residential neighborhoods without having significant impact upon residential uses. • Support modification of existing historic resources to allow for changes in use that will encourage the use of the structure for housing or other appropriate uses in historic districts in an effort to ensure preservation of the structure. • Adaptive reuse of historic structures should be allowed for a variety of uses in appropriate locations where it is found that the negative impacts can be mitigated and where the uses do not require significant alterations to the historic integrity of the interior of the structure. Planning staff determined the proposals are not consistent with the following elements of the plans. • Ensure access to affordable housing citywide(including rental and very low income). • Provide accessible parks and recreation spaces within 1/2 mile of all residents. • Preserve low-density residential areas and keep them from being replaced by higher density residential and commercial uses. • Review and modify land-use and zoning regulations to reflect the affordability needs of a growing, pioneering city. • Lead in the construction of innovative housing solutions. • Support diverse and vibrant neighborhoods by aligning land use policies that promote a housing market capable of accommodating residents throughout all stages of life. Planning staff noted the proposals would change the property's zoning from one that primarily permits residential units to a zone that primarily permits commercial uses and does not allow residential uses. If the property is rezoned and changed to commercial use,it cannot be converted back to single-family residential use without another zoning change. Planning stated the following: Given the age and size of the home, it is likely a "naturally occurring"affordable unit of housing, or a housing unit that is affordable because of its characteristics rather than being restricted by covenant as affordable to households of a certain income level. Therefore, the loss of this home would also represent a loss in the city's stock of affordable housing,which is already very limited. This property is roughly Zoo feet(1125 mile)away from Liberty Park.If it were converted to commercial use, that would mean one fewer household would have close access to the park... Consideration 4-Comparison of RMF-3o and CN Zoning As discussed above,the proposal is to change the zoning designation and future land use map from its current RMF-30 (Residential Multi-Family)to CN(Neighborhood Business).The primary differences between the zones are what uses are allowed. RMF-3o allows a variety of housing types including single-, two-, and multi-family dwellings, along with uses typically associated with residential neighborhoods, such as gardens,parks, and places of worship. Page 14 CN zoning does not allow most types of housing except mixed-use,which is a combination of residential and other uses.Most uses in the CN zone are commercial. The following tables comparing RMF-3o and CN zoning designations are found on pages 12-14 of the Planning Commission staff report.They are replicated here for convenience. RMF-30(Existing) CN(Proposed) Maximum Building Height 30 feet 25 feet Front Setback 20 feet 15 feet Side Setback Corner side yard: 10 feet Corner side yard:15 feet Interior: Interior:None a.Single-family and two-family dwellings: Interior lots:4 feet on one side and 10 feet on the other Corner lots:4 feet b.Single-family attached:No yard is required,however if one is provided it shall not be less than 4 feet. c.Twin home dwelling:No yard required along one side lot line.A 10- foot yard is required on the other. d.Multi-family dwelling:10 feet on each side. e.All other permitted and conditional uses:10 feet Rear Setback 25 percent of the lot depth,but not 10 feet less than 20 feet and need not exceed 25 feet Lot Size Single-family detached:5,000 SF No minimum required.Maximum lot Twin home:4,000 SF per unit size of 16,500 SF. Two-family dwelling:8,000 SF Multi-family dwelling:g,000 SF (additional lot area required for buildings with more than three units) Other permitted or conditional uses: 5,000 SF Permitted Uses Single-,two-,and multi-family Retail,offices,restaurants,other dwellings;uses associated with commercial uses,mixed use residential neighborhoods. development. NEW PERMITTED USES IN CN NEW CONDITIONAL USES IN CN Page 5 Uses not permitted in RMF=3o but would be newly Uses not allowed in RMF-3o but would be allowed permitted under the proposal change to CN as a conditional use under the proposed CN zoning •Adaptive reuse of landmark site •Alcohol,bar establishment(2,500 square feet or less in •Art gallery floor area) •Artisan food production(2,500 square feet or less in floor •Animal,veterinary office area) •Bed and breakfast manor •Bed and breakfast •Parking,off site •Bed and breakfast inn •Furniture repair shop •Clinic(medical,dental) •Vehicle,automobile repair(minor) •Commercial food preparation •Daycare center,adult •Daycare center,child •Dwelling,living quarter for caretaker or security guard •Financial institution •Governmental facility requiring special design features for security purposes •Library •Mixed use development •Mobile food business(operation on private property) •Museum •Office •Place of worship on lot less than 4 acres in size •Recreation(indoor) •Recycling collection station •Restaurant •Retail goods establishment •Plant and garden shop with outdoor sales area •Retail services establishment •Reverse vending machine •Sales and display(outdoor) •Seasonal farm stand •Studio,art PERMITTED USES IN RMF-3o CONDITIONAL USES IN RMF-3o NO LONGER ALLOWED IN CN NO LONGER ALLOWED IN CN Uses currently permitted in RMF-3o but would no Uses currently allowed in RMF-3o as a longer be allowed under the proposed change to conditional use but would no longer be allowed CN under the proposed change to CN •Dwelling,accessory unit •Dwelling,assisted living facility(limited •Dwelling,manufactured home capacity) •Dwelling,multi-family •Dwelling,congregate care facility(small) •Dwelling,single-family(attached) •Dwelling,group home(large) •Dwelling,single-family(detached) •Municipal service use,including City utility use Page 6 •Dwelling,twin home and two-family and police and fire station •Parking,park and ride lot shared with existing use •School,seminary and religious institute •Temporary use of closed schools and churches PERMITTED USES IN BOTH RMF-3o AND CN CONDITIONAL USES IN RMF-3o Uses that are currently permitted in RMF-3o and ALSO ALLOWED IN CN would continue Uses that are currently allowed in RMF-3o as a conditional use and would continue to be allowed as a permitted or conditional use under the proposed change to CN •Accessory use,except those otherwise •Adaptive reuse of landmark site—Becomes permitted regulated in the zoning ordinance. •Daycare center,child—Becomes permitted •Community garden •Governmental facility—Becomes permitted •Daycare,nonregistered home daycare •Place of worship on lots less •Daycare,registered home daycare or preschool •Dwelling,group home(small) •Home occupation •Open space •Park •Urban farm •Utility,building or structure •Utility,transmission wire,line,pipe,or pole Analysis of Factors Pages 35-36 of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal.The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. 4 � Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent Does not comply with the purposes,goals,objectives,and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the Complies specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. The extent to which a proposed map amendment will Complies affect adjacent properties Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent Complies with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. The adequacy of public facilities and services Complies intended to serve the subject property,including,but not limited to,roadways,parks and recreational facilities,police and fire protection,schools, Page ( 7 stormwater drainage systems,water supplies,and wastewater and refuse collection. City Department Review During City department and division review of the petitions,the Housing Stability Division noted the potential loss of one residential unit for non-residential use of the property and referenced housing loss mitigation. Other responding departments and divisions did not express concerns with the proposal,but stated additional review would be needed if changes are made to the property. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • March 24, 2022-Petition for zoning map and accompanying text amendment received by Planning Division. • April 7, 2022-Petition assigned to Michael McNamee, Principal Planner. • February 9, 2022-Information about petitions sent to Central City and Liberty Wells Community Council Chairs. o The community councils did not provide formal comments. • April 28, 2022-Early notification mailed to property owners and residents within 300'of the subject property. • April-October 2022-Project posted to the Online Open House webpage. • October 6, 2022-Historic Landmark Commission briefing. • October 12, 2022-Public hearing notice posted on property. • October 13, 2022-Public hearing notice mailed to property owners and residents within 300'of the subject property. Public hearing notice posted on City and State websites and Planning Division listserv. • October 26, 2022-Planning Commission public hearing.The Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments. • October 27, 2022-Ordinance requested from Attorney's Office. • December 8, 2022-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney's Office. • December 22, 2022-Transmittal received in City Council Office. Page 18 i j e T Mendenhall Architecture ! & Design, Ilc 4635 South Highland Holladay, UT 84117 '.. 801.277.293 I � EXISTING F10USE �� NEW ADU r7 C) I: Uj `t f � f dr J t Q � Q 0 _j o' L J81TE PLAN DATE IN ors Project....'..Project N—be Date 1',"Oat, D,,,,,'o A.tho ''.... Checked'oy Checker SITE PVaN O PROJFCf TRUE m NORTH NORTH AO . I i T M, A3 0 Mendenhall Architecture & Design, 1Ic 20'-O" 10,-O" 4635 South Highlond SETBACK Holladay, UT 84117 801.277.293 oU Q PROPERLY LINE -' N ----------- --------- ®m®_®_®_®m®.®m®m®_®m®.®m®m®_®_®_®m®.®m®_®_®.--------------- -®_®_®_� I 1 j I 1 I I 1 ADA PARKING STALL - 1 PARKING 5TALL I E EXISTING HOUSE I o 0 I I m J g I I I T _._._._-_._ _ _ I REMOVE FXISTNG ADDITION - �--'"— Y I O U s ............. ....................... ........................................................... PROPERTY L INE W \� 3 V1 U PRIVATE DRIVE � A3.0 o Q = W Q O .®m®_®_®_®m®_®_®_®m®m®m®_®_®_®.®m®_®_®_®_®m®.®.®m®m®m®.®m®_®_®_®m®.®.®_®_®m®m®m®_®_®_®_®m®_®_®_®m®.®m®m®_®_®.®m®_®_®_®_®m®.®m®m®m®m®m®m®_®_®_®m®m®m®_®_®m®.®m®_®_®_ J MAIN LIVING = 550 561. ft. 73, MAIN �.J 1/4"=C-e° DATE —0 Project--Project Number Date Issue Oat" D,,,,,Ev Autho ''.... Checked'oy Checker FLOOR PLAN5 '.. N A �//'J� //'J\ o 1�1 1�1 ■ ORMONIS Mendenhall Architecture & Design, Ilc 4635 South Highland pnnF pnnp H011801 Y. UT 8943117 10_0_0„— — — — 0_0„— — — — — — — — — — — — 8d., U s MAIN MAIN — — — — — — n NORTH EAST r, 1/4"=1'-0' 1/4"=1'-0" ILI V Ip,_pF,— — — — — — — �J 10O0,� 771 I o L �AIN _ n MAIN DATE Protect....'..Project Number Date I_',[)ate D,,,,,'o Autho ''.... Checked'oy Checker �n 5OUTH `- I WE5T 2 m A3 . 0 0 ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor �` ' and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas ng k1t7 c/1= Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 12/22/2022 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 12/22/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: December 22, 2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community &Neighborhoods SUBJECT: 865 S 500 E Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendment (PLNPCM2022-00301 &PLNPCM2022-00302) STAFF CONTACT: Michael McNamee, Principal Planner michael.rncnamce(als�ov.com or 801-535-7226 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the proposed Zoning Map and Master Plan amendment. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Rick Service, the property owner of 865 South 500 East, initiated a petition to amend the Zoning Map and Central Community Master Plan in March of 2022. The request is to rezone the subject property from RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial), and redesignate the property on the future land use map in the Central Community Master Plan from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. On October 26, 2022, the Planning Commission heard the petition and forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council to amend the Zoning Map and Central Community Master Plan. If approved, the property owner intends to change the use of the existing single- family home to a commercial use. The specific commercial use would be determined after the amendments were approved. The property is located in the Central City Local Historic District, and the house is listed as a contributing structure to the district, which protects it from demolition without the approval of the Historic Landmark Commission. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 ViCinity Map u • • ff a� i q4 Subject Pnapedy Zoning Districts Cis Open Space RS Resi tiatl&mess CN At,ighO cod Com m emial R-115, Shgte-F ily Residential RMF-30 Low Density Muftl-Fam iy Residential RMF-45 Moderatelytigh Density Adults-Family Resdentiat Salt Lake City Planning Division 4/28/2022 The CN zone is a commercial zoning district that is intended to be compatible with residential neighborhoods. The permitted size and scale of development is similar to RMF-30,but the number and type of land uses allowed in CN is quite different from RMF-30. RMF-30 permits single-, two-, and multi-family dwellings, as well as uses that are incidental to residential neighborhoods such as parks and daycares. By contrast, CN permits primarily commercial uses such as retail, offices, and restaurants. Residential is only allowed as part of a mixed-use development. The proposed change would facilitate the replacement of a single-family dwelling use with a commercial use. HOUSING LOSS MITIGATION: The applicant was required to submit a housing loss mitigation plan as part of this request,per Chapter 18.97 of the Zoning Ordinance, which requires that a housing loss mitigation plan is approved by the city before any petition is approved for a zoning change that would permit a nonresidential use of land, that includes within its boundaries residential dwelling units. A housing loss mitigation plan is required for this petition because the CN zone allows nonresidential uses. Options for mitigating residential housing loss include providing replacement housing, paying a fee to the City's housing trust fund based on the difference between the housing value and replacement cost of building new units, and, where deteriorated housing exists and is not caused by deliberate indifference of the landowner, the petitioner may pay a flat fee to the City's housing trust fund. These options were considered, and paying a fee based on the difference between housing value and replacement cost was determined to be the most feasible. The applicant is not proposing to build any new housing to replace the single-family dwelling that would be lost, and he is not claiming that the existing dwelling is deteriorated. The fee amount was determined in the October 18, 2022 housing loss mitigation plan to be $61,967.76. The applicant has been made aware of this requirement under the ordinance. The City Attorney's Office has advised against enforcing housing loss mitigation plans pending adoption of the City's new Thriving in Place housing initiatives. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Petition for the zoning map and master plan amendment was accepted by the Salt Lake Planning Division on March 24, 2022. • The petition was assigned to Michael McNamee, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing on April 7, 2022. • The petition was deemed complete on April 20, 2022. • Information concerning this petition was sent to the chairs of the Central City and Liberty Wells Community Councils on April 28, 2022. o The Community Councils did not provide formal comments. • The surrounding property owners and residents within 300' of the subject properties received an early notification by mail on April 28, 2022. • Public notification for the Planning Commission hearing was mailed October 13, 2022 to all neighbors within 300' of the Zoning Map and Master Plan amendment site. The public notice was also posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve. • The petition was heard by the Planning Commission on October 26, 2022. The Planning Commission voted 5-3 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council regarding the proposed zoning map and master plan amendment. o There were three public comments received prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) R(LA&,enda of October 26,2022 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of October 26. 2022 (Click to Access) C) Planning CommissiontalfRcport of October 26, 2022 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3) Ordinance 4) Original Petition 5) Mailing List TABLE OF CONTENTS: L CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORDINANCE 4. ORIGINAL PETITION 5. MAILING LIST L CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor �` ' and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas ng k1t7 c/1= Director PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2022-00301 &302 March 24,2022 Petition for the zoning map and master plan amendment received by the Salt Lake City Planning Division. April 7,2022 Petition assigned to Michael McNamee,Principal Planner. April 28,2022 Information about the proposal was sent to the Chair of the Central City and Liberty Wells Community Councils in order to solicit public comments and start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment period. April 28,2022 Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal.The Online Open House period started on April 28, 2022 and ended June 15, 2022. April 28,2022 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. June 15,2022 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. No formal comments were submitted to staff by the recognized organizations to date related to this proposal. October 12,2022 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. October 13,2022 Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting of October 26,2022. Public hearing notice mailed. October 26,2022 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 26, 2022. By a majority vote of 5-3, the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map and master plan amendment. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2022-0301 and PLNPCM2022- 00302 —865 S 500 E Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendment—Salt Lake City has received a request from Rick Service,the property owner,to amend the zoning map for the property located at 865 South 500 East from RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential District) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial District), and to amend the Central Community Master Plan so that the property would be redesignated on the future land use map from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. The lot is approximately .08 acres (3,628 square feet). The intent of the rezone request is to allow for the conversion of the existing single-family dwelling on the property to a commercial use. The property is located within Council District 5, represented by Darin Mano. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition.During the hearing,anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah This meeting will be held via electronic means,while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information,please visit www.sic.gov/councillvirtual-mectinas. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments(ii slc ov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Michael McNamee at 801-535-7226 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at michae].nlcnanlee(a/"slcLov.conl. The application details can be accessed at https:"citi/enportal.slc�-lov.com,', by selecting the "Planning" tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2022-00301 or PLNPCM2022-00302. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at couiicil.comincntsrrx;s�ov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. ORDINANCE SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Amending the zoning of property located at 865 South 500 East Street from RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District to CN Neighborhood Commercial District, and amending the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 865 South 500 East Street from RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District to CN Neighborhood Commercial District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00301, and amending the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00302. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission ("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on October 26, 2022 on an application submitted by Rick Service ("Applicant") to rezone property located at 865 South 500 East Street(Tax ID No. 16-07-276-024) (the "Property") from RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District to CN Neighborhood Commercial District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00301, and to amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map with respect to that parcel from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00302; and WHEREAS, at its October 26, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council") on said applications; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE,be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Property identified on Exhibit"A" attached hereto shall be and hereby is rezoned from RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District to CN Neighborhood Commercial District. SECTION 2. Amending the Central Community Master Plan. The Future Land Use Map of the Central Community Master Plan shall be and hereby is amended to change the future land use designation of the Property identified in Exhibit"A" from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM (SEAL) Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date.Dec mber 8, 2022 Bill No. of 2023. By: _ Published: P I C.Xielso Senior City Attorney Ordinance amending zoning and MP 865 S 500 E EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property to be Rezoned and Subject to Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment: 865 South 500 East Tax ID No. 16-07-276-024 BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK 2, EHRICHS SUBDIVISION, OF BLOCK 5, PLAT B, SALT LAKE CITY SURVEY, AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 33 FEET; THENCE EAST 110 FEET; THENCE NORTH 33 FEET; THENCE WEST 110 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH A PERPETUAL RIGHT OF WAY OVER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED STRIP OF LAND, TO-WIT: BEGINNING 33 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3, THENCE EAST 140 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 FEET; THENCE WEST 140 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 4. ORIGINAL PETITION 4oning Amendment Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance 0 Amend the Zoning Map 01PPICE USE MY Rec Date Receive eived By: d: Project Name or Sections of Zoning Amendment: PLEASE t4 INK"WATION Address of Subject Property(or Area): 865 South 500 East Name of Applicant: Phone: Rick Service .:801-680-6735 Address of Applicant: P.O. Box 71899, Salt Lake City, LIT 84171 E-mail of Applicant: Cell/Fax: rick service679yahoo.com 801-680-6735 Applicant's interest in Subject Property: 0 Owner [3 Contractor 1] Architect 0 Other,,- Name of Property Owner(if different from applicant): 5 & 9 LLC E-mail of Property Owner: Phone: rickservice679yahoo.com 01-680-6735 Pleaw note that additional information may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and made public, Including professional architectural or engineering dravurigs,for the purposes of public review by any interested party, A CCROULTATWIN If you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application,please contact Salt Lake City Planning Counter at zoning@sl�-_ civcor�n prior to submitting the application. Map Amendment:filing fee of$1,075 plus$121 per acre in excess of one acre Text Amendment:filing fee of$1,075,plus fees for newspaper notice. Plus,additional fee for mailed public notices. Noticing fees will be assessed after the application is submitted, + If applicable,a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will the required, Signature of Owner or Agent: Date: Rick Service 3/24/22 Uodated 8/2VM2,1 i< project Description iplease electronically attach additional sheets, See Seclion 21A.50 for the Amendments ordinance.} A statement declaring the purpose for the arnencimem- E LA description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned, List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area, is the request amending the Zoning Map? If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed, E7is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance? If so, please Include language and the reference to the Zoning Ordinance to be changed, jmwwTEirUTHEC0AVWEAPPUiCATWN Apply online through the Citizen_Access Portal,There is a to learn how to submit online. V"XMWLETIE APPUCATW4 WILL NOT'BE ACCEPTED R S I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed.I understand that Planning will not accept MY application unless all of the following items are included in the submittal package, UpisardWa/7021 Zoning Amendment Requirements The reason for changing the zoning from RMF-30 to CN Neighborhood Commercial are many. The existing residential building at 865 South 500 East is placed on the lot in such a way that it lends itself more to the two neighboring propefties to the south zoned N. The two neighboring properties to the south are 501 & 511 East 900 South. 511 East 900 South and 865 South 500 East share a driveway. 511 East 900 South has their Handicap Parking space at the rear of the property that is accessed from the shared driveway. Their deliveries are also received by use of the shared driveway. There is no alleyway access so all deliveries must back down the shared driveway. 865 South 500 East does not have covered parking, it just has two parking spaces at the rear of the building. There is no back yard to this house, which is why it is impossible to rent the house to a family. UDOT, along with Salt Lake City, are in the process of improving bus travel along 500 East. They have put a large cement pad directly in front of the house along with a bench. A large lighted enclosure with a garbage can will be installed soon. That makes the property feel like a commercial property with no front yard. Last but not least I truly want the challenge of improving and transforming the residential building to a small commercial building. When I purchased the neighboring two properties to the south, one was an abandoned gas station for 32 years with graffiti on the walls and a make- shift homeless persons shelter. I turned 501 East 900 South into the restaurant "Tradition". It was quite a challenge but I feel it turned out well, The property at 511 East 900 South when I purchased it was a 100 year old house being used as a residential rental. I remodeled it and today it is a very thriving commercial building as Settex Meats, a very successful butcher shop. Both properties employ local people bringing revenue into the area. Knowing that this houses in the Historic District, as it was built in 1908, 1 will be able to work with the Historic District to improve the use of the building while staying within the parameters set by the Historic District. The adjoining properties zoned ON have a total square footage of 14,808 square feet. The CN zoning allows for up to 90,000 square feet. With the addition of 865 South 500 East being only 3,484 square feet the will be a total of only 18,292 square feet for the entirety of the new proposed CN zone. This is much smaller than the allowed 90,000 square feet, Allowing this property to be added to the existing Chi zoning will create a more balanced and useable commercial comer. The CN zoning calls for "small scale low intensity commercial use". I believe that changing the zoning of this property too Chi will to do just that. Please give me the opportunity to improve the property. At this time I do not have a specific use in mind for the property. I have spoken with several people who might be interested in the space. One such person wants to put a dog grooming and supply store, another person who runs a very successful sandwich shop wants to open a new location there. I anticipate remodeling the building and making it a shining example of what is possible in the ON zoning. Parcel Number 16-07-276-024-0000 Master Plan Amendment L Amend the text ®f the Master Plan Amend the Land Use Map WKI UR ONLY Received By., Date Received: Project#: Name of Master Plan Amendment: PLEASE PROVIM THE fOUJOWMG INFOMWATWN Address of Subject Property for Area): 865 South 500 East Name of Applicant- Phone: Rick Service 801-680-6735 Address of Applicant: P.O. Box 71899, It Lake City, UT 84171 E-mail of Applicant: Cell/Fax: rick service674yahoo.com 1801-68"735 Applicant's Interest in Subject Property: Owner Contractor Architect Other: Name of Property Owner(if different from applicant): E-mail of Property Owner: Phone: rickservice672yahoo.conn 801-680-6735 Please note that additional information may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and made public,including professional architectural or engineering drawings,for the purposes of public woo review by any interested party. AVARASILE CONSUMI"ON Planners are available for consultation prior to submitting this application. Please email Kgn!g,$ sl ov. carry�if you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application. RED Filing fee of$1008 plus$M per acre in excess of one acre. 11C*for newspaper notice, Plus,additional fee for mailed public notices.Mailing fees will be assessed after application is submitted, If applicable,a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required. Signature of Owner or Agent: Date: Rick Service 3/24/22 Updated 9/16/2021 SUOMMALOWNtEMENTS 1. Project Description(please attach additional sheets electronically.) Describe the proposed master plan amendment, E— A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment- Declare why the present master plan requires amending. Is the request amending the Land Use Map? If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed. E--1 is the request amending the text of the master plan? if so,please include exact language to be changed, MMUTO FRETHIF COMPLMAPPUCATION Apply online through the gjjZ n s rt 1.There is a 9i2:ky:EttR1m!!;!g to learn how to submit online. 94COA64-M APPL"TMM WAIL Wr K ACCEPTED R S I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed. I understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following Items are included in the submittal package. Updatede/W2021 Master Plan Amendment I wish to change a all portion of the Central Community Master Plan. The plan change would be to amend the zoning of a single family residence zoned RMF-30 to a CN Neighborhood Commercial zone. The property is at 865 South 500 East. The property is bordered by two properties can ON. With a zoning change of this property, all three properties on the corner of 500 East and 900 South will have the same zoning. This will create a balance to the comer and will pro to more commercial services to the ongoing vibrant Liberty Park Neighborhood. It will create a gathering place in such a walkable neighborhood. The infrastructure is already in place to support the change. Part of the Central Community Master Plan is to promote more Commercial Services in the area. The amendment change will allow me the flexibility to select a tenant that will add to the vibrant area. Parcel Number 16-07-276-024-0000 } { ) £ \ \ / / k / § . \ � i £ � . { � , / / • { ,� � , 5. MAILING LIST geometry Occupant PARCEL—A[NEW_UNIT CITY STATE ZIPCODE Geocortex.Current Oc 828 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 836 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 475 E 900! Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 906 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84105 Geocortex.Current Oc 827 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 841 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 857 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 840 S PARIk Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 844 S PARIk Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 848 S PARIk#NFF1 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 846 S PARIk Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 865 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 501 E 900 Salt Lake Ci UT 84105 Geocortex.Current Oc 511 E 900! Salt Lake Ci UT 84105 Geocortex.Current Oc 533 E 900! Salt Lake Ci UT 84105 Geocortex.Current Oc 853 S PARIk Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 geometry OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADD own—unit OWN_CITY OWN_STA1 OWN_ZIP Geocortex.LIBERTY 9 LLC 1126 E GILI SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.HARRIS APARTMENTS SLC LLC 1012 CHAK OGDEN UT 84403 Geocortex.ROBERT A EVANS 844 S 500 E SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.JOSE R LEAL;ARMANDO VALLE(TC) 854 S 500 E SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SALT LAKE 1776 S WE' SALT LAKE UT 84115 Geocortex.SARAH GENE JOLLEY 848 S 500 E SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 883 E 4900 MURRAY UT 84107 Geocortex.GERALD&LISA OTTO TRUST 8/28/2017 460 CREST` PARK CITY UT 84098 Geocortex.DUANE E CRABTREE;ELISSA CRABTREE(JT) 833 S 500 E SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.MICHAEL W BAKER;ERIN BAKER CAPOBIANCO 672 LARCH DALY CITY CA 94015 Geocortex.ROBERTJ WYNNE 851 S 500 E SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.AMM TRUST PO BOX 5& SALT LAKE UT 84158 Geocortex.BRYCE R WHITAKER 828 S PARk SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 4605 S BO) MURRAY UT 84107 Geocortex.844 S PARK ST,A SERIES OF PREF GROUP,LLC 939 W HEA PHOENIX AZ 85013 Geocortex.MICHAEL W BAKER;ERIN BAKER CAPOBIANCO 672 LARCH DALY CITY CA 94015 Geocortex.TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 2864 E PIN COTTONW UT 84121 Geocortex.JOHN SEARLE;BENJAMIN TOLMAN(1T) 852 S PARk SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.CHRISTINE REYES 856 S PARk SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.KDC TRUST 860 S PARk SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.5&9,LLC 3201 E CHI. COTTONW UT 84121 Geocortex.STEVEN R SEARE 517 E 900 #NFF1 SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.CHRISTINA S HANNAN-CANETE HERITAGE TRUST 6/30/2017 521 E 900 #NFF1 SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.DEBRA FRAZIER LIVING TRUST 12/07/2018 864 S PARk SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.5&9,LLC 3201 E CHI. COTTONW UT 84121 Geocortex.5&9,LLC 3201 E CHI. COTTONW UT 84121 Geocortex.STEVEN R SEARE 517 E 900 SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.CHRISTINA S HANNAN-CANETE HERITAGE TRUST 6/30/2017 521 E 900 SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.JBELA LLC 1241 E POP MILLCREEK UT 84117 Geocortex.JAMES SULLIVAN 537 E 900 SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.CHELSEA SIMMONS 539 E 900 SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.SIAOSI P VAENUKU;SIAOSI P AKA:VAENUKU VAENUKU;KATALINA F VAENU 849 S PARk SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.MAC R CURTIS;SUSAN L CURTIS 851 S PARk SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.PARK STREET PROPERTIES LLC 6737 S HUE SALT LAKE UT 84121 Geocortex.SELDOM SCENE HOLDINGS,LLC 857 S PARk SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.JEANETTE NEWHOUSE;CALE NEWHOUSE 859 S PARk SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.MARK ANDREW LOEWEN;NATALIE KAY LOEWEN(JT) 545 E 900! SALT LAKE UT 84105 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ������ ��•i��i CITY COUNCIL Of SALT LAKE CPTY t = rn= Item Schedule: Briefing:January 1�7,2023, TO: City Council Members February�7,2023 Set Date:January 1�7, 2023, FROM: Brian Fullmer March 7,2023 Policy Analyst Public Hearing: February�7,2023, March 21,2023 Potential Action:March 21. 202� DATE: March 7,2023 RE: Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Amendment PLNPCM2022-00475 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION After the public hearing on February 7th, some Council Members expressed interest in having additional work session discussion time to consider other options, and potentially reconsider some of the straw polls which were taken at the February 71h work session. As a reminder,the following straw polls were taken: • Supported keeping one off-street parking space. • Supported keeping the following exceptions to required off-street parking: o If the property is within 1/2 mile of a designated bicycle lane or path. o If the property is within 1/4 mile of transit. • Supported removing an exception to the off-street parking requirement if sufficient space for on- street parking is available in front of the house. • Supported increasing the maximum size of a detached ADU to 1,000 square feet. • Did not support the Planning staffs recommended 1,200 square foot maximum size of a detached ADU on lots 12,000 square feet or larger. • Supported retaining the owner occupancy requirement. • Supported amending corner side yard setbacks to 20%of the lot width or 10 feet,whichever is less. This would allow an ADUs on corner lots to be located closer to the street than to an adjacent property. • Supported removing the conditional use requirement for ADUs. • Did not support limiting ADU height to the principal structure's height. The following is a list of additional ideas that have been raised by Council Members since the last discussion,grouped by topic area: i. Ideas relating to the owner occupancy requirement: CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY.UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 i�a a. Option to remove the requirement altogether. b. Option to require construction of ADUs to be owner occupied for 1 year,with the option to remove the restriction after one year of no substantiated zoning or civil enforcement complaints. c. (could be combined with a or b)Require a business license and institute a fee to offset costs of enforcement, and require commitment to not use as a short term rental • For any landlord using an ADU as a rental.Two different fees have been suggested (subject to cost justification), $1,000 per year or $2,400 per year($200 per month) • Allow owner occupied properties to have this fee waived • The fee cannot be waived by the Good Landlord program d. Add a sunset clause for the owner occupancy requirement citywide. If there is no additional Council action,this requirement would sunset in 24 months (or some other period). e. Potential ideas that may be related to owner-occupancy reconsideration: • reconsider straw poll relating to parking requirements for lots within 1/2 mile of designated bicycle lane • reconsider straw poll to increase the size from 720 to l000 square feet 2. Enforcement a. Add 1 or more employees(FTEs)in Civil Enforcement specifically to address ADU related violations including noise, illegal Short-Term Rentals,etc. Costs could be offset by fees (idea raised in item i.e.). Consider allocating funds in Budget Amendment#5 as a Council- added item. 3. Incentives a. Use a legislative intent or allocate funds in Budget Amendment #5, or an upcoming RDA budget amendment,to make creation of affordable ADU programs a higher priority.The funding could address staffing costs to develop and administer programs as well as direct program costs such as incentives. Ideas raised include pre-approved development plans, subsidy for utility connection fees,direct financial support in form of grants or loans, examine other way's ADUs have shown to be expensive(fire sprinklers, etc.). 4. Other questions Council Members asked staff(this section may be updated prior to the March 7 discussion. It reflects questions as of March 1. Council staff is working on gathering additional information). * To what extent has comment from the public and community councils addressed owner occupancy? * To what extent did the Planning Commission discuss owner occupancy? * To the extent that studies are cited in relation to the impacts of owner occupancy requirements, can Council staff thoroughly review those studies to provide Council Members specific information about whether any owner occupancy conclusions are objectively verifiable and applicable to different markets?Is owner occupancy isolated as a specific variable,or is it grouped with a list of other possible variables? * Are there stronger enforcement tools such as restrictive covenants that can help mitigate neighborhood impacts? Next steps: The Chair and Vice Chair are planning on a work session discussion March 71b, with a second public hearing and potential considerations for action March 21s', which is the next formal Council Meeting. FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING AND PUBLIC HEARING UPDATES Follow-up Briefing At the February 7, 2023 follow-up briefing,the Council reviewed five Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)topics discussed at the previous briefing.These topics were parking requirements,maximum ADU size, owner occupancy requirement, setback, and a conditional use requirement. Page 1 2 The Council held a series of straw polls indicating their positions on these various topics.The Council Chair reminded the public that these straw polls are not the final votes and Council Members may feel differently following the public bearing. (Refer to straw polls above.) Public Hearing Update Seventeen people spoke at the February 7, 2023 Public hearing expressing support for, or opposition to, ADUs.Those in favor cited the need for additional quality, affordable housing in the city,ADUs provide a way to add moderate density to neighborhoods, and potential benefits to property owners. Suggestions were made to incentivize micro units,review fees and other permitting requirements, and require ADU compatibility with the lot's original structure. Those who expressed opposition to the proposal noted the difficulty enforcing on illegal short-term rentals, ADUs blocking light from neighbors'gardens and solar collectors, and potential negative impacts to neighborhoods. The Council closed the public hearing and deferred action to a future Council Meeting. The following information was provided for the February 7, 2023 Council briefing.It is included again for background purposes. BRIEFING UPDATE At the January 17, 2023 briefing, Council Members focused their discussion on five topics related to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs): parking requirements,maximum ADU size, owner occupancy,required setbacks, and conditional use requirements.A summary of each topic is included below, as well as potential straw polls for Council consideration. Potential Straw Polls Staff is including the following potential straw polls to help clarify the Council's wishes regarding five main topics discussed during the briefing. 1. Is the Council supportive of maintaining the existing requirement for a minimum of one off-street parking space for ADUs where the proposed exceptions do not apply? If so, does the Council support the following exceptions in the draft ordinance? a. The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off-street parking requirement. b. The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking requirement. c. The property is within one-half mile of a designated bicycle lane or path. 2. Does the Council wish to increase the maximum size of a detached ADU to: a. 720 square feet as proposed by Planning staff? b. 1,00o square feet as proposed by the Planning Commission? C. 1,200 square feet on lots 12,000 square feet or larger? 3. Does the Council wish to maintain the current owner occupancy requirement? 4. Is the Council supportive of the proposed setback requirements shown below? a. A suggestion was made for corner side yard setbacks Of 20%of the lot width or lo feet, whichever is less. Is the Council supportive of this? 5. Does the Council wish to remove the conditional use requirement for ADUs? Parking Requirements The proposed ordinance maintains the requirement for one on-site parking space for an ADU. Under the proposal,the following circumstances allow this requirement to be waived: • The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off-street parking requirement. Page 3 • The property already includes at least one accessible stall beyond the minimum parking requirement. • The property is within one-half mile of a designated bicycle lane or path. Council Members discussed advantages and disadvantages of this requirement. It was noted the off-street parking requirement could be a barrier to some who would like to construct an ADU. Eliminating the requirement for off-street parking would potentially create additional issues for areas that have limited on- street parking or are near venues that draw large crowds and attendees often park in the nearby neighborhoods. Maximum ADU Size Planning staff recommended increasing the maximum size of a detached ADU from the current 650 square feet to 720 square feet. (The proposal allows detached AUDs up to 1,200 square feet on lots 12,000 square feet or larger.) During the Planning Commission briefing, Commissioners included a recommendation of increasing the maximum size to i,000 square feet. The Council discussed potential neighborhood impacts if the maximum size is increased to 1,00o square feet. It was noted a compact two-bedroom ADU would be feasible if the maximum size was increased to 720 square feet. Owner Occupancy A robust discussion was held about the requirement for a property owner to reside on the property.A suggestion was made to remove this requirement, noting a reduction of the pool of potential buyers if the property is listed for sale. Other points raised were removing the owner occupancy requirement could exacerbate issues with absentee landlords, and requiring owner occupancy may lead to higher quality ADU materials and construction. A majority of Council Members expressed support for retaining the owner occupancy requirement. Required Setbacks Planning staff reviewed current and proposed setbacks for detached ADUs with the following table: Standard Current Requirement Proposed Requirement Minimum New accessory buildings and additions to 3 feet from interior side or rear lot lines. Setback existing accessory buildings: 4 feet from any side 10 feet from corner side lot line. or rear lot line. If accessory building is taller than 17 feet,setback must Second story additions: 10 feet from any side or be increased by I foot for every additional foot in height rear lot line,unless abutting an alley,in which case above 17" setback can be reduced to 4 feet. If accessory building is taller than 17 feet,setback must be increased to 10 feet, unless abutting an alley, in which case setback can be reduced to 4 feet. Council Members discussed whether a io-foot setback from a corner side yard is appropriate. Planning staff stated the current ordinance does not specify setback requirements for detached ADUs on corner lots. Rather, it defers to general accessory building setbacks,which are not allowed less than 20 feet from the side yard property line on corner lots.They noted moving a detached ADU closer to the street would have less of an impact on abutting property. On narrower lots, a 20400t setback in corner side yards may require an ADU close enough to the opposite property line that it prohibits the abutting property owner from adding an ADU to their property due to spacing requirements between dwelling units. A discussion was also held about potential impacts reducing the minimum side or rear yard setback from four feet to three feet. Page 14 Under the proposal balconies would be allowed on the second story of a detached ADU and face any direction.They may not encroach into the required setback areas, contain HVAC equipment, or be used for storage. Conditional Use Requirements Planning staff reviewed the conditional use requirement origin.They noted the Council's request for a process allowing public input on ADU petitions.Making ADUs a conditional use was the only option identified to meet this request. Planning said the Planning Commission has not denied any ADU applications.They stated detrimental neighborhood impacts related to ADUs that are not addressed in City Code are not happening.The Planning Commission added few conditions to ADU applications in more than three years. Planning staff calculated the time required to process 25 ADU applications per year equals one full time staff person. Some Council Members expressed concern about removing the conditional use process.They noted the public was told this would be part of the ADU process and now that may change. The following information was provided for the January 17, 2023 Council briefing.It is included again for background purposes. The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the City ordinance related to Accessory Dwelling Units(ADUs) making external units a permitted rather than conditional use, expand locations in the city where they can be built,simplify standards, and encourage their construction. At its February 9, 2022 meeting,the Planning Commission voted to initiate a petition making ADUs a permitted use in any zoning district where residential units are permitted.This includes ADUs that are internal, attached to a main structure,or in a detached building. Current code only allows ADUs in owner- occupied properties in the City that currently have single family homes(as a conditional use in single- family districts), although internal ADUs are allowed by right due to state code.The Planning Commission expressed a stated desire to expand opportunities for ADUs. City Council and Administrative staff input was also provided resulting in proposed changes summarized in the Additional Information section below. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal during its September 14, 2022 meeting and held a public hearing at which three people spoke. Comments focused on making ADUs affordable, support for owner occupancy of the main house, and a suggestion for City funding to assist homeowners to construct ADUs. Concerns cited include removing the conditional use could impact adjacent neighbor privacy,a lack of public comments when ADUs are constructed,and neighborhood impacts from additional on-street parking. Commissioners discussed increasing the maximum size of a detached ADU from the proposed 720 square feet to 1,000 square feet.A motion was made to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council that includes a modification to increase the maximum size of a detached ADU to 1,00o square feet.That motion passed 6-2.Those voting against the motion were not supportive of the i,000 square foot maximum. It should be noted the draft ordinance allows detached ADUs up to 1,200 square feet if the lot size exceeds 12,000 square feet,is outside a residential zoning district, or is part of a planned development that includes a minimum of four dwelling units. In response to a Council Member question,Planning staff clarified there is no minimum space between a detached ADU and the primary residence other than required fire code separation. Page 15 The draft ordinance includes a requirement that the owner reside on the property.This requirement may be met by a person related to the property owner or a trustor of a family trust that owns the property living on the property. Exceptions of up to three years are provided for property owners who are on temporary work assignments,serve in the military,are on sabbaticals,or participating in voluntary service.An additional exception is included for property owners who are placed in a hospital, nursing home, assisted living facility or other similar facility that provides medical care. Goal of the briefing:Review the proposed zoning and future land use map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. The Council may wish to discuss maximum ADU square footage of 720 square feet, 1,000 square feet, or larger based on lot size. 2. The proposed ordinance includes a requirement that the owner reside on the property as noted above.The Council may wish to discuss whether to keep this requirement. 3. The Council may wish to discuss incentive options for homeowners constructing ADUs to be rented at affordable rates,and potential sources of that funding. a. The Council, acting as the RDA board, allocated funding in the g line project area to assist in funding construction of ADUs,although this funding was limited to that project area. b. The Council has also directed funds from"Funding Our Future"sales tax revenue towards incentivizing development of affordable housing units and programs. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION As previously noted,there are several proposed changes to the ADU ordinance.These are summarized below. For the complete analysis,please see pages 2-10 of the Planning Commission staff report. Remove Conditional Use Requirement ADUs are currently permitted in two-family and multi-family zoning districts by-right when associated with a single-family dwelling. Detached ADUs in a single-family residential district are required to go through the conditional use process. It is worth noting House Bill 82 went into effect in October 2021 making internal ADUs permitted uses in single-family residential zones.The proposed ordinance aligns with that legislation. The proposal removes a conditional use requirement for detached ADUs in single-family residential districts.This would streamline the process for applicants and reduce staff and Planning Commission time needed to review ADU applications. Planning staff noted"Potential negative impacts of ADUs would continue to be managed by the development standards in the ADU Ordinance." Expand Where ADUs Can Be Built One goal of the proposed ADU amendments is to expand where they are allowed.Tables summarizing impacts to zoning districts under the proposed ADU amendments are included on pages 3-4 of the Planning Commission staff report.They are replicated in Attachment A to this report for convenience. Currently ADUs are allowed as a conditional use on properties used for single-family residential in residential zoning districts. In summary,the proposed changes would allow ADUs as a permitted rather than conditional use in single-family residential zoning districts,allow them as a permitted use in several lower intensity commercial zoning districts,transit station districts,form-based,and downtown zoning districts.ADUs would continue to be prohibited in manufacturing districts, and special purpose districts. Page 6 Planning staff included the following maps on page 5 of the Planning Commission staff report showing current locations where ADUs are allowed and where they would be allowed under the proposal.The maps are included here for convenience. Map showing where ADUs are currently allowed e raa••�. 7��. ...e .s�arrsau -.a® -Lek...., �■®�rr.r . --- 4.. la Legend U Permitted(Detached or Intemel) Detached ADU Requies Conditional Use tJ Not Permitted Map showing where ADUs would be allowed under proposed changes Images Courtesy Salt Lake City Planning Division Ak r _ Inv II IIII i� Legend �! ®AD PefTn,tted(Detached or Intemal; ADU Not Permitted Page ( 7 Adjust Size, Bulk, and Yard Requirements The proposed amendment modifies size,bulk,and yard requirements to generally make them less restrictive.These are summarized in the following tables provided by the Planning Division. (Images depicting various standards are found on pages 7-8 of the Planning Commission staff report.) Internal ADUs Standard Current Requirements Proposed Requirement Maximum Size 50%of gross square footage of No maximum.Aligns with HB82. principal structure. Detached ADUs Standard Current Requirement Proposed Requirement Maximum Size 50%of principal structure's In residential zoning districts: footprint or 650 square feet, 720 square feet maximum. whichever is less Can be increased to 1,200 square feet if lot is 12,000 square feet or larger. Maximum Height 17 feet. 17 feet. If principal structure is taller Can be increased up to 24 feet than 17 feet,ADU can be the with an increased setback. same height as the principal structure,up to 24 feet. Minimum Setback New accessory buildings g feet from interior side or rear and additions to existing lot lines. accessory buildings: 4 feet from any side or rear lot line. io feet from corner side lot line. Second story additions: 10 If accessory building is feet from any side or rear lot line, taller than 17 feet,setback unless abutting an alley,in which must be increased by 1 foot for case the setback can be reduced every additional foot in height to 4 feet. above 17 feet. If accessory building is taller than 17 feet,setback must be increased to 10 feet, unless abutting an alley,in which case setback can be reduced to 4 feet. Page 8 Introduce Alley Activation Requirements Detached ADUs are often constructed adjacent to public alleys,which provides an opportunity to activate the alleys.The proposed amendment adds requirements for ADUs abutting alleys to include lighting on the ADU to illuminate the abutting alley segment, and a path between the ADU and alley. Keep Short-Term Rental Restrictions The proposed amendment maintains the current ordinance prohibition on short-term rentals.A definition of"short-term rental"as a dwelling unit offered for rent or lease for less than 3o days would be added. Adjust Other Requirements The proposal adjusts and clarifies requirements for decks,patios,and outdoor space. Rooftop patios continue to be prohibited,but balconies are permitted provided they meet setback requirements. Parking requirements for ADUs would be maintained much as they are if the proposed amendments are adopted. Proposed additions to parking requirements include circumstances under which the required off- street parking stall may be waived.These are: • The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off-street parking requirement. • The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking requirement. • The property is within one-half mile of a designated bicycle lane or path. KEY CONSIDERATION Planning staff identified one key consideration related to the proposal which is found on pages 10-12 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis,please see the staff report. Consideration 1-How the proposal helps implement city goals and policies identified in adopted plans Planning staff reviewed how the proposed amendments align with goals and policies found in Plan Salt Lake(2015)and Growing SLC:A Five-Year Housing Plan 2018-2022(2017).They determined the proposal is consistent with several items found in the Growth, Housing,Transportation&Mobility,and Preservation chapters of Plan Salt Lake.Among the initiatives proposed changes align with are the following: • Locate new development in areas with existing infrastructure and amenities, such as transit and transportation corridors. • Encourage a mix of land uses. • Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land. • Accommodate and promote an increase in the city's population. • Encourage housing options that accommodate aging in place. • Enable moderate density increases within existing neighborhoods where appropriate. Planning also found the proposal is consistent with goals and objectives in Growing SLC.These include: • Review and modify land-use and zoning regulations to reflect the affordability needs of a growing, pioneering city. • Develop infill ordinances that promote a diverse housing stock, increase housing options,create redevelopment opportunities, and allow additional units within existing structures,while maintaining neighborhood impacts. Page 19 • Revise the Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance to expand its application and develop measures to promote its use. • Support diverse and vibrant neighborhoods by aligning land use policies that promote a housing market capable of accommodating residents throughout all stages of life. ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Attachment C(pages 32-34)of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal.The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the Complies purposes,goals,objectives,and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific Complies purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the Proposed regulations would purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning take precedence over districts which may impose additional standards. overlay zoning districts, except for the Historic Preservation Overlay District.Amendments would be limited by additional standards in this district. The extent to which a proposed text amendment implements Complies best current,professional practices of urban planning and design. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • February 9, 2022-Petition initiated by Planning Commission. • May 12, 2022-Petition assigned to Michael McNamee, Principal Planner. • May 17, 2022-Application posted for online open house. • May 18, 2022-Notice mailed to all community councils. • March 30, 2022-45-day public comment period for recognized organizations ended. • September 2, 2022-Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. • September 8, 2022-Staff report posted to Planning's website. • September 14, 2022-Planning Commission meeting and public hearing. Positive recommendation forwarded to the City Council. Page I to • September 29, 2022-Ordinance requested from Attorney's Office. • November 28, 2022-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney's Office. • December 12, 2022-Transmittal received in City Council Office. Page 1 ATTACHMENT A: Proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit Use Change from Conditional to Permitted Use in Residential Zoning Districts Zoning District District Name FR-1 Foothills Estate Residential FR-2 Foothills Residential FR-3 Foothills Residential R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential Continue to Be Permitted Residential Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District SR-1&SR-IA Special Development Pattern Residential SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential R-2 Single-and Two-Family Residential RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential RMF-45 Moderate/High-Density Multi-Family Residential RMF-75 High-Density Multi-Family Residential RB Residential/Business R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use R-MU Residential/Mixed Use RO Residential/Office Special Purpose Districts Zoning District Name of District FP Foothills Protection AG Agricultural AG-2 Agricultural AG-5 Agricultural AG-20 Agricultural MU Mixed Use Page 12 Change From Prohibited to Permitted Use Commercial Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District CN Neighborhood Commercial SNB Small Neighborhood Business CB Commercial Business CS Community Shopping CC Corridor Commercial CSHBD Sugar House Business District CG General Commercial Transit Station Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District TSA-UC Urban Core TSA-UN Urban Neighborhood TSA-MUEC Mixed Use Employment Center TSA-SP Special Purpose Form-Based Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District FB-SC Special Purpose Corridor Core Subdistrict FB-SE Special Purpose Corridor Edge Subdistrict FB-UN1* Urban Neighborhood FB-UN2* Urban Neighborhood *Detached dwelling units currently permitted and will be removed from code Downtown Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District D-1 Central Business District D-2 Downtown Support District D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District G-MU Gateway Mixed-Use Page ( 13 Continue to be Prohibited Manufacturing Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District M-1 Light Manufacturing M-2 Heavy Manufacturing Residential Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District SR-2 (Reserved) Special Purpose Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District RP Research Park BP Business Park A Airport PL Public Lands PL-2 Public Lands I Institutional UI Urban Institutional OS Open Space NOS Natural Open Space MH Mobile Home Park EI Extractive Industries Page 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Amending chapter 21A.33, sections 21A.40.200, 21A.40.050, and 21A.27.030 related to Accessory Dwelling Units, and Amending definitions in Title 21 A associated with the foregoing) An ordinance amending sections 21A.40.200, 21A.40.050, and 21A.27.030 related to Accessory Dwelling Unit creation, size and form, amending Chapter 21A.33 to make Accessory Dwelling Units a permitted use across several zoning districts, and amending definitions in Title 2 1 A associated with the foregoing all pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475. WHEREAS, on September 14, 2022, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission ("Planning Commission")held a public hearing on a petition submitted by the Planning Commission to amend land use regulations pertaining to accessory dwelling units (Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475); and WHEREAS, at its September 14, 2022, meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council("City Council") on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE,be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending Section 21A.40.200. That Section 21A.40.200 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is adopted as follows: 21A.40.200: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: A. Purpose. The regulatory purpose of this section is to promote an increase in the housing stock within the city and promote housing choices by allowing and regulating accessory dwelling units (ADUs). B. Conflicting Regulations. If a regulation found in this section is in conflict with an applicable regulation in the base zoning district, overlay district, or provision of general applicability, the regulation in this chapter shall take precedence, with the following exceptions: 1. The regulations set forth in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; and 2. The Special Foothills Regulations set forth in section 21A.24.010.P of this Title. C. Owner Occupancy Required. The owner of the property, as defined in this section, shall reside on the property. For the purposes of this title, "owner occupant" shall mean the following: 1. An individual who is listed on a recorded deed as an owner of the property; 2. Any person who is related by blood, marriage, or adoption to an individual who is listed on recorded deed as an owner of the property; or 3. An individual who is a trustor of a family trust who possesses legal ownership of the property. 4. Exceptions a. Owner occupancy is not required for an ADU located on a property with a principal use as a duplex, multi-family dwelling, or non-residential land use. A single-family dwelling with an attached ADU does not constitute a duplex. b. The owner has a bona fide, temporary absence of three (3)years or less for activities such as military service, temporary job assignments, sabbaticals, or voluntary service (indefinite periods of absence from the dwelling shall not qualify for this exception); or c. The owner is placed in a hospital, nursing home, assisted living facility or other similar facility that provides regular medical care, excluding retirement living facilities or communities. D. Number Of Allowed ADUs: A single ADU is allowed on a property where permitted in chapter 21A.33 of this Title. E. Location on Property. An ADU is allowed in the following locations on a property as indicated below: 1. Internal ADUs shall be located within the buildable area of the property. 2. A detached ADU shall be allowed as indicated in the table below: Front yard Not permitted Corner Side yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is no closer to the corner side property line than the principal structure. If the property is less than 50' in width, the ADU may be closer to the corner side property line than the principal structure. Interior Side yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is located behind the rear facade of the principal building. Rear yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below. Buildable area Permitted Notes 1. The use of the term "yard"in this section shall be interpreted to mean a required yard as indicated in the underlying zoning district. 3. A detached ADU shall be placed at a minimum distance from property lines as indicated below: Rear property line 3' Side property line 3' Corner Side property line 20% of the lot width, or 10', whichever is less Notes: 1. Additions to an existing accessory building shall comply with the setbacks in this table. This includes additions that add a second story. 2. An existing accessory building that is being converted to an ADU may maintain the existing setbacks of the accessory building. If a conversion includes an expansion (including adding a second story)the expansion shall comply with all applicable setback requirements in this table and in subsection 21A.40.200.F. F. ADU Building Height 1. The maximum building height for a detached ADU is 17 feet, subject to the following exceptions: a. Height may be increased up to 24 feet for a pitched roof or 20 feet for a flat roof provided the side and rear yard setbacks are increased one foot for each additional foot in building height above 17 feet. The setback does not need to be increased above the minimum indicated in Section E on the side of an ADU that abuts an alley or on the side of an ADU that abuts a property that is in a zoning district other than those listed in section 21A.24 of this Title. b. Converting a legally existing accessory building is permitted when the existing accessory building exceeds the permitted height of this section. c. When an ADU is located fully within the buildable area of the property, the height of the ADU is allowed up to the permitted height of the principal building in the underlying zoning district. d. Solar panels attached to the roof of an ADU are permitted to exceed the maximum height of the structure up to four feet. 2. Building height for a detached ADU shall be measured in the same manner as the height for the principal building. 3. An internal ADU is subject to the same height requirements as the principal building. G. ADU Parking 1. The number of parking stalls provided for the principal use shall not be reduced below the minimum identified in Chapter 21 A.44 of this Title in order to accommodate an ADU. One parking stall is required for the ADU, except as indicated below: a. The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off street parking requirement; b. The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking requirement for the principal use; c. The property is within a 1/4 mile radius of a public transit stop; or d. The property is within '/z mile of a city-designated bicycle lane or path. H. Regulation of decks,patios, and outdoor space for detached ADUs 1. Decks more than 2 feet above the existing grade are prohibited unless the ADU is located within the buildable area of the lot in which case the deck shall be subject to the same regulations for decks that apply to the principal building. 2. Rooftop patios on a detached ADU are prohibited. 3. Patios are permitted. A patio may be covered with a roof provided the square footage of the roof is no larger than 120 square feet and the covered patio complies with the setbacks required of the ADU. A covered patio shall not count towards the maximum square footage requirement of the ADU, but does count towards the total building coverage of the lot. 4. Balconies on ADUs: a balcony is permitted on a building containing an ADU provided the balcony does not extend into a required ADU setback and extends no further than 5 feet from an exterior wall of the ADU. Balconies shall not contain HVAC equipment nor be used as storage areas. 5. Internal ADUs shall be subject to the same standards for decks,patios, and other encroachments that apply to the principal building and use. I. ADUs located along a public alley. A detached ADU that is located within 15 feet of a public alley shall include the following: I. An exterior light shall be located on the exterior wall of the ADU to illuminate portions of the alley adjacent to the ADU. The lighting fixture shall be shielded, oriented and designed to direct light down and avoid light pollution onto adjacent properties. All uplighting is prohibited. 2. A 4' wide path from the alley to the entrance of the ADU shall be provided. If there is a fence between the ADU and the alley, a gate shall be provided, and the path shall lead to the gate. If the ADU is located within 15 feet of two or more public alleys, this requirement shall only apply to one of the alleys. 3. An ADU located on an alley that exists on the recorded plat maps or Atlas Plats of the city but has not been used for vehicular access or is otherwise blocked by encroachments such as fences or vegetation are exempt from this requirement. J. ADU Gross Floor Area: I. Detached ADU. None may exceed 1,000 square feet in gross floor area. 2. Internal ADU. There is no maximum gross floor area provided the building complies with all applicable standards in the underlying zoning district. 3. Gross floor area for a detached ADU shall be calculated as follows: a. When the building includes other allowed accessory uses, only the square footage dedicated to the ADU shall be counted. b. When the ADU is on a second level, stairs and required landings providing access to the ADU shall not be counted. c. Loft space with a ceiling height lower than 7 feet within an ADU shall not be counted towards the total square footage of the ADU. d. Basements shall not count towards the maximum gross floor area of the ADU, so long as: i. The basement is only used for storage or a use permitted by section 21A.40.040.E of this chapter; and ii. There is no internal circulation between the ADU and the basement. K. Second Story Windows. Windows on the second story of a detached ADU are prohibited on an exterior wall that is adjacent to a side or rear property line unless: 1. The window is a clerestory window where the bottom of the window is at least 6 feet above the finished floor of the second story; 2. The window is on a wall that faces an elevation of the principal building; 3. The window faces and is at least 10 feet from a side or rear property line; 4. The exterior wall is adjacent to an alley; or 5. The window faces a side or rear property line that is adjacent to a property in a zoning district that permits commercial uses or a property that contains a nonresidential use. L. Maximum Building Coverage. Accessory dwelling units are subject to the maximum building and yard coverage requirements of the applicable zoning and overlay districts. M. Building Permit Required. A building permit is required to establish any ADU in the city. All ADUs are required to comply with all adopted applicable codes including but not limited to building, fire, and public utilities. N. Administrative Regulations: the following administrative regulations are intended to provide direction on applying and interpreting the regulations of this chapter. 1. There is no minimum lot size required for an ADU. 2. An ADU does not count towards the density allowed in the underlying zoning district. 3. ADUs that have been approved prior to (effective date), as part of a conditional use are considered legal conforming uses and may be modified if the modification complies with the requirements of this section and any other applicable standard of this Title. O. Zoning Certificate and Good Landlord Program: 1. A certificate of occupancy for the ADU shall not be issued until a zoning certificate is issued. A zoning certificate may be issued at the same time as the certificate of occupancy. If a certificate of occupancy is not required, the zoning certificate shall be issued prior to the ADU being occupied. 2. If a business license is required for the rental of the ADU, the owner shall be enrolled in the landlord/tenant initiative program as defined in title 5, `Business Taxes, Licenses And Regulations", of this Code prior to issuing a zoning certificate. P. Restrictive Covenant: An ADU that is required to be owner occupied shall have a restrictive covenant filed against the property on which the ADU is located, which restrictive covenant shall include the following information: 1. A description of the primary dwelling and the ADU, including whether the ADU is within the principal structure or a detached structure, the square footage of both the primary dwelling and the ADU, and how off-street parking is allocated between the primary dwelling and the ADU. 2. A statement that the ADU may only be used and occupied in accordance with the applicable regulations adopted in the Salt Lake City Code. 3. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office against the subject property. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be provided to the Planning Division and attached to the building permit record prior to final inspection of the ADU. If no final inspection is required, the copy of the recorded covenant shall be provided prior to occupying the ADU. Q. Use Regulations 1. An ADU shall not be rented as a short term rental as defined in 21.A.62.040. 2. An ADU may include any home occupation authorized by this title. 3. An ADU may be converted to any other accessory use that is allowed in the zoning district. 4. An ADU cannot be converted to another principal use. SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Section 21A.40.050.13.2. That Section 21 A.40.050.13.2 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 2. Building Coverage: a. In the FR, R-1, R-2 and SR residential districts the maximum footprint of any accessory buildings shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the building footprint of the principal structure except as follows: (1) Notwithstanding the size of the footprint of the principal building, at least four hundred eighty (480) square feet of accessory building coverage shall be allowed subject to the compliance with all other requirements in section 21 A.40.050. (2) Accessory buildings constructed within the buildable area that are located between the rear facade of the principal building and the rear yard setback may exceed 720 square feet provided the building is located entirely within the buildable area and the property complies with the maximum building coverage requirements of the underlying zoning district. (3) The building coverage for a detached accessory dwelling unit shall be subject to the standards in 21 A.40.200, regardless of the building coverage requirement in this section. (4) An accessory building that contains an accessory dwelling unit on the second level may exceed the maximum coverage up to the footprint of the accessory dwelling unit. b. The combined coverage for all hoop houses, greenhouses, and cold frames shall not exceed thirty five percent(35%) of the building footprint of the principal structure. SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.020. That Section 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended as follows: 21A.33.020: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS: Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District F F F R- R- R- S S S R- R M R R R R- R- R- R R- R- R- 1j 1/ 1j R- R- R- 2 M F- M M B M M M O 1j 2j 3/ 1 2 3 F- F- F- U- U- U 12 7, 5, 35 4 21 12 ,0 0 0 3 45 75 35 45 3, ,7 ,0 0 0 0 0 56 8 o o o o 0 0 0 Dwelling, P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P accessory unit SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.030. That Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended as follows: 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS: Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District CN CB CS' CC CSHBDI CG SNB Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P P P P SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.035. That Section 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended as follows: 21A•33.035: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR TRANSIT STATION AREA DISTRICTS: Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Core Transition Cor Transition Cor Transition Cor Transition e e e Dwelling: Accessory P P P P P P P P unit SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended as follows: 21A•33•050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS: Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P SECTION T Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.060. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended as follows: 21A.33.o6o: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE GATEWAY DISTRICT: Use G-MU Dwelling: Accessory unit P SECTION & Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.070. That Section 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended as follows: 21A•33•070: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN FORM BASED DISTRICTS: Use I Permitted Uses By District FB FB-UN2 FB-SC FB-SE UN1 Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P SECTION 9. Amending the Text of Section 21A.27.030.D.3. That Section 21 A.27.030.D.3 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: D. Other Applicable Development Standards: 3. Accessory Uses, Buildings And Structures: All accessory uses,buildings and structures shall comply with the applicable standards in chapter 21A.40 of this title. a. Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District specific standards for detached or accessory parking garages or structures: (1) Detached or accessory multilevel parking garages or structures shall have the same setback requirements for principal structures. (2) The minimum setback required shall be landscaped to provide a buffer to the abutting Residential District. No structure (primary or accessory) shall be permitted within this landscaped buffer. SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Section 21 A.60.020. That Section 21 A.60.020 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended to include the following terms: Atlas, 5-Acre, And 10-Acre Plats Balcony Bike Lane Bike Path Deck Dwelling, Accessory Unit(Internal) Footprint Non-residential Use Porch Rooftop Patio Short Term Rental Transit Route Uplighting SECTION 11. Amending the Text of Section 21A.62.040. That definitions of the terms "Atlas, 5-Acre and 10-Acre Plats", "Balcony", "Bike Lane", "Bike Path", "Deck", "Dwelling, Accessory Unit (Detached)", "Dwelling, Accessory Unit(Internal)", "Footprint", "Non- Residential Use", "Porch", "Rooftop Patio", "Short Term Rental", "Transit Route", and "Uplighting"be added to Section 21A.62.040 and amending the terms "Dwelling, Accessory Unit (ADU)", and"Building Coverage" in Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code as follows: ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS: A map depicting the subdivisions of land within the City. These plats are a scheme of how the City was originally laid out. The City started with plats A through L, Salt Lake City Survey. As the City expanded its boundaries, 5 acre and 10 acre Big Field Survey Plats were added and then the numbered plats I through 76. They show information about streets,public right of ways and, some private right of ways. BALCONY: An elevated floor space projecting beyond the exterior walls of a building that is not supported on the ground by posts, columns, or similar supporting structural elements. A balcony shall not be used as a means for entry into a building. BIKE LANE: A division of a road for use by cyclists marked off with painted lines or other means. BIKE PATH: A path or road for bicycles and not motor vehicles. May include paths that also allow pedestrian or equestrian access. DECK: A platform sitting above finished grade and supported on the ground. DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU): A type of accessory use that includes a residential unit located on the same lot as a separate principal use, either within the principal structure or within a separate accessory structure. The accessory dwelling unit shall be a complete housekeeping unit with a shared or separate entrance, and separate kitchen, sleeping area, closet space, and bathroom facilities. DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED): An accessory dwelling unit located wholly within a structure that is accessory to the principal use and buildings on a lot or parcel. DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL): An accessory dwelling unit created: 4. within a primary building; and 5. for the purpose of offering a long-term rental of 30 consecutive days or longer. BUILDING COVERAGE: That percentage of the lot covered by principal or accessory buildings, including cantilevered portions of the building. FOOTPRINT: The measurement of lot area covered by a building, including cantilevered portions of the building. NON-RESIDENTIAL USE: Lands, buildings or structures or portions thereof used or designed or intended for uses other than a residential use, including, but not limited to, commercial, industrial and institutional uses. PORCH: An unenclosed structure attached to a building, covered by a separate roof, and providing access to an entrance to a building. Similar structures providing access to an entrance other than the primary entrance shall be considered a covered deck when located on a platform that is more than two feet(2') above finished grade. ROOFTOP PATIO: A portion of a flat roof that is dedicated to occupiable space, or a deck sitting atop a roof. SHORT TERM RENTAL: The use of a dwelling unit or units that are offered for rent or lease for a period less than 30 days. TRANSIT ROUTE: A route over which a public transit vehicle travels and that is specifically labeled or numbered for the purpose of picking up and dropping off passengers at regularly scheduled stops and intervals. UPLIGHTING: Lights that have been designed to throw illumination upward. SECTION 12. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM Bill No. of 2023. Salt Lake CityAttorney's Office Published: Date: February 15, 2023 Ordinance Amending Accessory Dwelling Units By: Katherine D.Pasker,Senior City Attorney I SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2023 3 4 (Amending chapter 21A.33, sections 21A.40.200, 21A.40.050, and 21A.27.030 related to 5 Accessory Dwelling Units, and Amending definitions in Title 21 A associated with the foregoing) 6 7 An ordinance amending sections 21A.40.200, 21A.40.050, and 21A.27.030 related to 8 Accessory Dwelling Unit creation, size and form, amending Chapter 21A.33 to make Accessory 9 Dwelling Units a permitted use across several zoning districts, and amending definitions in Title 10 2 1 A associated with the foregoing all pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475. 1 I WHEREAS, on September 14, 2022, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission 12 ("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on a petition submitted by the Planning 13 Commission to amend land use regulations pertaining to accessory dwelling units (Petition No. 14 PLNPCM2022-00475); and 15 WHEREAS, at its September 14, 2022, meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor 16 of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council("City Council") on said 17 petition; and 18 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 19 adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. 20 NOW, THEREFORE,be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 21 SECTION 1. Amending Section 21A.40.200. That Section 21A.40.200 of the Salt Lake 22 City Code shall be and hereby is adopted as follows: 23 21A.40.200: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: 24 A. Pu e ctateme h gtilator-intention f this do *�arc intentions of . 25 1. Create new housing units while respecting the appearance and scale of single famil 26 residential deyel.,,-.,ti,ent 27 2. Provide-more housing ehoiees in residential , LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 28 , an 29 embodied energy contained within existing stf et,,.os• 30 , and families 31 seeking smaller households; 32 , and families with gr-ow 33 , 35 6. R,-oade,, the range of"f— d"b1®housing tl„-,,,,nl,o t the City; 36 , 37 ; 38 Q. Cupport transit oriented development and reduce auto usage by increasing de..,*'., 39 transit; and 40 ' 41 . 42 " shall mean t 43 following: 44 1. An individual who is listed ste r-ecoFded deed asowner- f the r ert y; 45 is 47 'I. A -ttstor- of a family tFust who possess s legal owner-ship of the- 48 pr-o 49 , 50 " , of this title and subject to oompliance with the applicable PFON'iSionS Of thiS 51 tithe- 52 , but not limited 53 to the F following,„otl,o4s 54 1. Conver-ting existing living ar-eawithin a single family dwelling as an addition to an 55 existing single family dwelling, or within a single family dwelling OFeated as neW e ; 56 of 57 , as an addition to an existing 58 . 59 : 60 1. GeneralRequirements Applicable To rm11 TEEeSs3r Dwelling axr,xr;te s 61 : City may permit one aeeessory &,elling unit for-eaeb lot that eontains -a 62 single family dy oll; n LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 63 b. Not A Unit Of Density: 64 . 65 e. Ownef:ship: An accessof-y,dwelling unit shall not be sold separ-ately or subdivided from 66 . 67 -J. Owner Oeeupancy: The City shall only permit an aceessory dwelling tinit when a 68 . 70 , tempofafy absenee of three (3) years of less for-aetivities 71 , 72exeeption)-, Of 73 , assisted living facility of othe 74 , 75 i*'- . 76 e. Number Of Residents: The total number- of residents that reside in an accessory aa__ 77 dwelling unit may of e-xeee-u the icirmber allowed fO " "family" as defined lii 78 or@ccc-rt;vrr-�� x.:crz..�, , �znxnrvirs TL-'�'li���vr irr 79 T. YA)30 iTC this . Le—. 81 g. Parking: An accessory dwelling tinit shall Fequire a minimum of one on site par-king 82 spaee. if the property has an existing dr-iveway, the drive-way area located between the pr-opert 83 line with an adjaeent stfeet and a legally located off street parking area ean satisfy the pafking 84 .ineipal tise is complied with and the driveway 85 (8') wide. The par-ki 86 requirement may be waived if--. 87 (1) Legal ly loeated on street paFking is available along the street ffontage of the subj ee 88 of of tran,;it 90 2. Additional Requirements FoF Aecessoiy Dwelling Units Located Within A Single Family 91 Dwelling: AccessoFy dwelling units located within a single family dwelling shall comply with 92 the following standaFdR 93 a. Any addition shall eomply with the building height, yar-d r-eqttiFements, and building 94 95 97 b. Size Re-quir-emems: No aecessofy dwelling unit shall oectipy mofe thim fifty per-cen 98 (500%o) Of the gFOSS sqttar-e footage of the single family dwelling. The square footage 99 attaebed gaFage shall not be included in the gross sqtiafe footage-unless the aeeessofy dwelling 100 . LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 101within 102 single family dwelling shall only be,,®nuitt^.l in the F llo win l ^.,tions• 103 (1) An existing o„t,-.nee t the single family dwelling; 104 (2) When located on a building facade that faces a corner side yafd, the entfance shall bee 105 set hair a minimum of twenty f of (20') f om the fort building facade; 106 (3) Extefior- staifs leading to an emr-anee above the first level of the pfi-neipal sttuetur-ee 107 shall only be l..`.at^rl on the Fear elevation of the building. 108 109 • 110 (5) Located on the reaf facade of the dwelling; ill ' ' 112 . 113 3. Additional Requirements For An Accessor-y Dwelling Unit Located in A Detached 114 Accessory Building: An accessoty dwelling u-nit located in a detaehed aecessofy building of as 115 an addition to an existing accessofy building shall eomply with the following standafds, 116 that an), of the standards in this section may be modifie" t,y the Historic; Landmark C 117 f pei4y located in an 14 u;sty„ic Prosen,.,tion O eflay District): 118 , bulk, and height 119 limitations fund m o^tie "?l R 4 f _ of this ehapto,- a„-1 a accessory building r-egulati 120 found in the underlying zoning district or any applicable overlay zoning district unless otherwise- 121 regulated by this section. An accessoty dwelling unit. located in an additional accessory building 122 may be constructed and shall not count towafds the maximum square footage of all accessor� 123 buildings as stated in subsection 21A.40.050132 of this chapteF. The accessor-y building 124 eontaining an aeeessoi=y dwelling unit shall not have a footpfint that is gFeater-than fift�y pereen 125 ° , and shall not exceed six htindfed fifty (650) 126 square feet. An aeeessor-y building that eomains an aeeessoFy dwelling unit and any other 127 128 2 A 4 nS(�•n ^>,,rto 129 b. Maximum Govefage: Shall eomply with the build* ovefage Fequiremems 130 , whichever-is 131 132 0. Setbacks. All accessory dwelling units located in an accessory building shall be loeated- 133 between the reaf wall of the single family dwelling and the rear-pfoper-ty line and be subject to 134 the following setback 135 (10') ffom the single family dwelling loeated 136 or the same pa Feel and any single family dwelling on a arl;. eent property-. 137 (2) ciao anfear-yaFd sotbaeks: 138 ' from a.n.y 139 ;ao rear lot lino LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 140 (B)— Additions-4E rg,keeesse >Buildings: The addition shall be l,,e to 141 . if an existing aeeessofy Wilding 142 ineltides an addition, all of of pot4ions of the existing stmetiir-e may be used as an aeeessof� 143 144 ean be alteFed to comply with the applieable seetions of the adopted Fire Code of the City. 145k ) Seeond Stofy Additions: A second stofy addition to an existing aeeessofy building 146 ' 147 side of rear property line and the seeond story addition eomplies with all applieable Fegulations 148 . if the 149 ' 150 A. —Building ueigh1 151 (4) The maximum height of an aeeessor-y building :i aeoessofy dwelling unit 152 shall not exeeed the height of the single family &,elling on the pr-opeFty OF exceed seventeen fee 153 (17) in height ,h;eheyef is less 154 , an 155 ---------bulldi——t—iming an aecessoi�, dwelling unit may be equal to the height of-the—sin& 156 (24') for an accessory 157 (20') for an aeeessory building with a flat 158 ' 159 (4') if the side or reaf 160 lot line ; add e„t t an .,lley. 161 (2) AccessoFy building height shall be measured to the ridge of the roof for buildings 162 with a pitched r-oof and t the top of the , of line for- a flat F ,f 163 e. Size Requifements: An aceessor-y building that contains an aeoessor-y dwelling uni 164 shall be subjeet to the building eovefage fequir-ements for aeoessefy buildings found in 165 seeti 166 ` Foss f400F area of s;v h„ndfe,a fifty (ticm square foot 167 .. — trance Locations. The ntr-anee to an aecessory dwelling unit in an aceessory buildin 168 shall he located: 169 (1) Faeing an alley, publie street of f4eing the rear-faeade of the single family dwelling 170 on the saine property. 171 172 foot (l 0') f,,,,-, the side oF rear pfope,-ty line 173 ' 174 firoom. a side or r-eaf pr-operty line unless the applicable side of rear pfopet4y line is adjacent to an 175 alley in which case th i i etback for-the aeeessoiy building applies to the s 176 177 a^^ess y dwelling unit shall eomply with the following stanch ds: 178 (1) Windows shall be no lafgeF than neoessar-y to oomply with the minimum Building 179 , eluestor-y windows, of:obseur-ed glazing LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 180 with 181 _ ' 182 ,„ope-ty line unless the sider-eaf pfoper-ty line ;s adjacent t an cello. 183 , lows shall maintain 184 simila dimension and design as the windows found on the principal stfuetwe. 185 , 186 , 187 if compliant with Building and Fire Codes. Existing windows located on a second level within a 188 . 189 h. Balconies And Deek�loonies and deeks-sha11b designed as-follows 190 (1) Shall not exceect eighty (90) square feet in size when located above the gfound level 191 of the building• 192 ' 193 b,le side or fear and lot line ; adjacent to a alley; 194 (3) Roof op `leeks are prohibited. 195 F. Registration Process: PropeFty owners seeking to establish an accessoty dwelling-nnit-,hA 196 eomply with the f ll wi g: 197 l n ppli..,tio : 198 199 this title. 200 201 isstied until a 7-oning eer-tificate is issued. A 7oning cei4ifleate may be issued at the same time as 202 , the zoning certificate 203 . 204 (2) Good Landlord Program. if a business lieense is required for-the rental of eithef the 205 , the owner shall be enfolled in the landlord/tenant initiative 206 Regulations",, 207 issuing a zoning oer-tificate. 208 b. Building Pennit: Apply fof and obtain a building pumit for the pfoposed aooessof� 209 dwelling unit regardless of method of e-e t;o,, 210 c. Proof Of Owner-Occupancy: An applioation for an accessory dwelling unit shall 211 inelude doctimentation that demonstrates an owner oeetipant resides on the property. The 212 documentation shall include any legal document that demonstfates complianeewith subsection 213 B, "Owner Oeo„r rt" of this se t; 214 2. Deed Restr-ietion. A lot appr-oved fof development with an aeoessofy dwelling tmit shall 215 , and shall be 216 . The form shall state that the owner- ooeupant mus LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 217 oeoupy the pfopefty as r-e"ifed within this section. Stieh deed restriction shall nin with the land 218 . 219 220 oecupancy or be ocetipied until the property owner completes the regi aass outlined M' 221 this section. RegistFation is not Fequifed if the ADU is oectipied by fel s of the pr-opeAy 222 owner: 223 G. Abandonment: if a property ble or unwillint-, too -fiH the requirements of this 224 section, the owner shall remove those features of the a ....... d_e4ing unit that make it 225 dwelling unit. Failure to do so will'. constitute a violation of this section. 226 14. Repoi4ing: The Plaflning Division shall pf:o;,,ide an annual r-epoft to the City couneil 227 detailing the number of applications, addFess of eaeh unit for-which an applieation was 228 submitted, a brief explanation of reasons why an applioationvvas denied, and a map shovving 229 . The Fepoi4 shall be transmitted to the City Counei4-by 230 FebFiiafy l 5th the prev ear, (0f:d. 53 'Q—�8) 231 232 A. Purpose. The re u latorypurpose of this section is to Promote an increase in the housings tock 233 within the city and Promote housing choices by allowingand nd regulating accessory dwelling units 234 ADUs . 235 B. Conflicting Regulations. If a regulation found in this section is in conflict with an applicable 236 regulation in the base zoning district, overlay district, or provision of general applicability, the 237 regulation in this chapter shall take precedence, with the following xceptions: 238 1. The regulations set forth in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; and 239 2. The Special Foothills Regulations set forth in section 21A.24.010.P of this Title. 240 C. Owner Occupancy Required. The owner of the property, as defined in this section, shall 241 reside on the property. For the purposes of this title, "owner occupant" shall mean the following_ 242 1. An individual who is listed on a recorded deed as an owner of the property 243 2. AU person who is related by blood, marriage, or adoption to an individual who is listed 244 on recorded deed as an owner of the property; or 245 3. An individual who is a trustor of a family trust who possesses legal ownership of the 246 prol2el:ly. 247 4. Exceptions 248 a. Owner occupancy is not required for an ADU located on a property with a 249 principal use as a duplex, multi-family dwelling, or non-residential land use. A 250 single-family dwelling with an attached ADU does not constitute a duplex. 251 b. The owner has a bona fide, temporary absence of three (3) years or less for 252 activities such as military service, temporary job assignments, sabbaticals, or 253 voluntary service (indefinite periods of absence from the dwelling shall not 254 qualify for this exception); or LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 255 c. The owner is placed in a hospital, nursing home, assisted livingfacility acility or other 256 similar facility that provides regular medical care, excluding retirement living 257 facilities or communities. 258 D. Number Of Allowed ADUs: A single ADU is allowed on a property where permitted in 259 chapter 21A.33 of this Title. 260 261 E. Location on Property. An ADU is allowed in the following locations on a property as 262 indicated below: 263 1. Internal ADUs shall be located within the buildable area of the property. 264 2. A detached ADU shall be allowed as indicated in the table below: Front yard Not permitted Corner Sided Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is no closer to the corner side property line than the principal structure. If the property is less than 50' in width, the ADU may be closer to the corner side property line than the principal structure. Interior Sided Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is located behind the rear fa ade of the principal building. Rearms Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below. Buildable area Permitted Notes 1. The use of the term"yard" in this section shall be interpreted to mean a required as indicated in the underlying zoning district. 265 266 3. A detached ADU shall be placed at a minimum distance from property lines as indicated 267 below: Rear property line 3' Side propgKtyjiUq 3' Corner Side property line 20% of the lot width, or 10', whichever is less Notes: 1. Additions to an existing accessory building shall comply with the setbacks in this table. This includes additions that add a second story. 2. An existing accessory building that is being converted to an ADU may maintain the existing setbacks of the accessory building. If a conversion includes an expansion (including adding a second story) the expansion shall comply with all applicable setback requirements in this table and in subsection 21A.40.200.F. 268 269 F. ADU Building Height LEGISLATIVE DRAF F 270 1. The maximum building height for a detached ADU is 17 feet, subject to the following 271 exceptions: 272 a. Height may be increased up to 24 feet for a pitched roof or 20 feet for a flat roof 273 provided the side and rear yard setbacks are increased one foot for each additional 274 foot in building height above 17 feet. The setback does not need to be increased 275 above the minimum indicated in Section E on the side of an ADU that abuts an 276 alley or on the side of an ADU that abuts a property that is in a zoning district 277 other than those listed in section 21 A.24 of this Title. 278 b. Converting a legally existing accessory building is permitted when the existing 279 accessory building exceeds the permitted height of this section. 280 c. When an ADU is located fully within the buildable area of the property, the 281 height of the ADU is allowed 0 to the permitted height of the principal building 282 in the underlyingzoning oning district. 283 d. Solar panels attached to the roof of an ADU are permitted to exceed the maximum 284 height of the structure up to four feet. 285 2. Building height for a detached ADU shall be measured in the same manner as the height 286 for the principal building. 287 3. An internal ADU is subject to the same height requirements as the principal building. 288 G. ADU Parking 289 1. The number of parking stalls provided for the principal use shall not be reduced below 290 the minimum identified in Chapter 21A.44 of this Title in order to accommodate an 291 ADU. One parking stall is required for the ADU, except as indicated below: 292 a. The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off street parking 293 requirement; 294 b. The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum 295 parking requirement for the principal use; 296 c. The property is within a 1/4 mile radius of a public transit stop; or 297 d. The property is within % mile of a city-designated bicycle lane or path. 298 H. Regulation of decks,patios, and outdoor space for detached ADUs 299 1. Decks more than 2 feet above the existing grade are prohibited unless the ADU is 300 located within the buildable area of the lot in which case the deck shall be subject to 301 the same regulations for decks that apply to the principal building. 302 2. Rooftop patios on a detached ADU are prohibited. 303 3. Patios are permitted. A patio may be covered with a roof provided the square footage 304 of the roof is no larger than 120 square feet and the covered patio complies with the 305 setbacks required of the ADU. A covered patio shall not count towards the maximum 306 square footage requirement of the ADU, but does count towards the total building 307 coverage of the lot. 308 4. Balconies on ADUs: a balcony is permitted on a building containing an ADU 309 provided the balcony does not extend into a required ADU setback and extends no LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 310 further than 5 feet from an exterior wall of the ADU. Balconies shall not contain 311 HVAC equipment nor be used as storage areas. 312 5. Internal ADUs shall be subject to the same standards for decks,patios, and other 313 encroachments that apply to the principal building and use. 314 I. ADUs located along a public alley. A detached ADU that is located within 15 feet of a public 315 alley shall include the following_ 316 1. An exterior light shall be located on the exterior wall of the ADU to illuminate 317 portions of the alley adjacent to the ADU. The lighting fixture shall be shielded, 318 oriented and designed to direct light down and avoid light pollution onto adjacent 319 properties. All upli hating is prohibited. 320 2. A 4' wide path from the alley to the entrance of the ADU shall be provided. If there is 321 a fence between the ADU and the alley, a gate shall be provided, and the path shall 322 lead to the gate. If the ADU is located within 15 feet of two or more public alley 323 requirement shall only pply to one of the alleys. 324 3. An ADU located on an alley that exists on the recorded plat maps or Atlas Plats of the 325 city but has not been used for vehicular access or is otherwise blocked by 326 encroachments such as fences or vegetation are exempt from this requirement. 327 328 J. ADU Gross Floor Area: 329 1. Detached ADU. None may exceed 1,000 square feet in gross floor area. 330 2. Internal ADU. There is no maximum gross floor area provided the building complies 331 with all applicable standards in the underlying zoning oning district. 332 3. Gross floor area for a detached ADU shall be calculated as follows: 333 a. When the building includes other allowed accessory uses, only the square footage 334 dedicated to the ADU shall be counted. 335 b. When the ADU is on a second level, stairs and required landings providing access 336 to the ADU shall not be counted. 337 c. Loft space with a ceiling height lower than 7 feet within an ADU shall not be 338 counted towards the total square footage of the ADU. 339 d. Basements shall not count towards the maximum gross floor area of the ADU, so 340 long as: 341 i. The basement is only used for storage or a use permitted by section 342 21A.40.040.E of this chapter; and 343 ii. There is no internal circulation between the ADU and the basement. 344 K. Second Story Windows. Windows on the second story of a detached ADU are prohibited on 345 an exterior wall that is adjacent to a side or rear property line unless: 346 1. The window is a clerestory window where the bottom of the window is at least 6 feet 347 above the finished floor of the second story 348 2. The window is on a wall that faces an elevation of the principal building;. 349 3. The window faces and is at least 10 feet from a side or rear property line; LEGISLATIVE DRAF F 350 4. The exterior wall is adjacent to an alley; or 351 5. The window faces a side or rear property line that is adjacent to a property in a zoning 352 district that permits commercial uses or a property that contains a nonresidential use. 353 L. Maximum Building Coverage. Accessory dwelling units are subject to the maximum building 354 and yard coverage requirements of the applicable zoning and overlay districts. 355 M. Building Permit Required. A building permit is required to establish any ADU in the city. 356 All ADUs are required to comply with all adopted applicable codes including but not limited to 357 building, fire, and public utilities. 358 N. Administrative Regulations: the following administrative regulations are intended to provide 359 direction on applying and interpretingthe he regulations of this chapter. 360 1. There is no minimum lot size required for an ADU. 361 2. An ADU does not count towards the density allowed in the underlyingzoning oning district. 362 3. ADUs that have been approved prior to (effective date), as part of a conditional use are 363 considered legal conforming uses and may be modified if the modification complies with 364 the requirements of this section and any other applicable standard of this Title. 365 O. Zoning Certificate and Good Landlord Program: 366 1. A certificate of occupancy for the ADU shall not be issued until a zoning certificate is 367 issued. A zoning certificate may be issued at the same time as the certificate of 368 occupancy. If a certificate of occupancy is not required, the zoning certificate shall be 369 issued prior to the ADU being occupied. 370 2. If a business license is required for the rental of the ADU, the owner shall be enrolled in 371 the landlord/tenant initiative program as defined in title 5, "Business Taxes, Licenses And 372 Regulations", of this Code prior to issuing a zoning certificate. 373 P. Restrictive Covenant: An ADU that is required to be owner occupied shall have a restrictive 374 covenant filed against the property on which the ADU is located, which restrictive covenant shall 375 include the following information: 376 1. A description of the primary dwelling and the ADU, including whether the ADU is 377 within the principal structure or a detached structure, the square footage of both the 378 primary dwelling and the ADU, and how off-street parking is allocated between the 379 primary dwelling and the ADU. 380 2. A statement that the ADU may only be used and occupied in accordance with the 381 applicable regulations adopted in the Salt Lake Ci . Code. 382 3. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office 383 against the subject property. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be provided to the 384 Planning Division and attached to the building permit record prior to final inspection of 385 the ADU. If no final inspection is required, the copy of the recorded covenant shall be 386 provided prior to occupying the ADU. 387 Q. Use Regulations LEGISLATIVE DRAF F 388 1. An ADU shall not be rented as a short term rental as defined in 21.A.62.040. 389 2. An ADU may include any home occupation authorized by this title. 390 3. An ADU may be converted to any other accessory use that is allowed in the zoning 391 district. 392 4. An ADU cannot be converted to another principal use. 393 SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Section 21A.40.050.B.2. That Section 394 21A.40.050.B.2 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 395 2. Building Coverage: 396 a. In the FR, R-1, R-2 and SR residential districts the max;,,,,,,,, building coverage of al 397 maximum footprint of any accessory buildings, excluding hoop house greenhouse 398 , shall not exceed fifty 399 percent (50%) of the building footprint of the principal structure„p to a m.,v;m,,m o 400 seven hundred twenty (720) square feet for a single family dwelling and one thousand 401 except as follows: 402 403 limited to fouF hund+ed eighty (4 80) squafe feet with an additional one hundred 404 . 405 Notwithstanding the size of the footprint of the principal building, at least four 406 hundred eighty (480) square feet of accessory building coverage shall be allowed 407 subject to the compliance with subjection B 1 of this section with all other 408 requirements in section 21A.40.050. 409 (22,) Accessory buildings constructed within the buildable area that are located between 410 the rear facade of the principal building and the rear yard setback may exceed 720 411 square feet provided the building is located entirely within the buildable area and the 412 property complies with the maximum building coverage requirements of the 413 underlyingzoning oning district. 414 QJ The building coverage for a detached accessory dwelling unit shall be subject to the 415 standards in 21A.40.200, regardless of the building coverage requirement in this 416 section. 417 (4) An accessory building that contains an accessory dwelling unit on the second level 418 may exceed the maximum coverage up to the footprint of the accessory dwelling 419 unit. 420 b. The combined coverage for all hoop houses, greenhouses, and cold frames shall not 421 exceed thirty five percent(35%) of the building footprint of the principal structure. 422 SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.020. That Section 21A.33.020 of 423 the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended as follows: 424 21A.33.020: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR 425 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District F F F R- R- R- S S S R- R M R R R R- R- R- R R- R- R- i/ R- R- R- 2 M F- M M B M M M 0 1/ 2/ 3/ 1 2 3 F- F- F- U- U- U 12 7, 5, 35 4 21 12 0 0 0 3 45 75 35 45 3, 7 0 0 0 0 0 56 8 o o o o 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dwelling, Cil' CP CP CP CP CP p p p p p p p p p p p p accessory unit 426 427 SECTION4. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.030. That Section 21A.33.030 of 428 the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended as follows: 429 21A.33-030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR 430 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS: Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District CN CB CS' cc CSHBD1 CG SNB Dwelling: Accessory unit p p p p p p p 431 432 SECTION5. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.035. That Section 21A.33.035 of 433 the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended as follows: 434 21A.33-035: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR TRANSIT 435 STATION AREA DISTRICTS: Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Core Transition Cor Transition Cor Transition Cor Transition e e e Dwelling: Accessory P p p p p p p p unit 436 437 SECTION6. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of 438 the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended as follows: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 439 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN 440 DISTRICTS: Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P_ P_ 441 442 SECTION T Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.060. That Section 21A.33.050 of 443 the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended as follows: 444 21A.33.o6o: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE 445 GATEWAY DISTRICT: Use G-MU Dwelling: Accessory unit P_ 446 447 SECTION 8. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.070. That Section 21A.33.070 of 448 the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended as follows: 449 21A.33.070: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN FORM BASED 450 DISTRICTS: Permitted Uses By District Use FB- FB-UN2 FB-SC FB-SE UN1 Dwelling: Accessory unit I P P P P 451 452 SECTION 9. Amending the Text of Section 21A.27.030.D.3. That Section 453 21A.27.030.D.3 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 454 D. Other Applicable Development Standards: 455 3. Accessory Uses, Buildings And Structures: All accessory uses, buildings and 456 structures shall comply with the applicable standards in chapter 21A.40 of this title.; 457 except as noted below. 458 a. Form based urban neighborhood district specific standards for detached dwelling zn 459 units: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 460 (1) Detached dwelling units tna�,be built in a required yard as a stand alone unit. 462 , twe family 464 465 t.s,e ty rive feet (25') in height 466 , 467 from property lino shall be a minimum of four- f of (4 468 (5) All building eonfigor-ation standards that apply to the pfimmy bttilding form 469 sliall also apply to the detaehed dwelling unit, with the exceptions 470 below: 471 (A)The detaelied dwelling unit shall have an entfy featofe-that faees or-is 472 aecessib o f m a publ e alley when r e t. 473 (B)The entry featufe may be a stoop that has a minimum dimension of 474 feet by f feet (4' x n'). and 475 (G)The ground floor-tFanspar-eney i:equir-ement does not apply to detaebed 476 dwelling tinits loeated on the seeond Poof of an aeoessofy stniettife. 477 ba. Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District specific standards for 478 detached or accessory parking garages or structures: 479 (1) Detached or accessory multilevel parking garages or structures shall have the 480 same setback requirements for principal structures. 481 (2) The minimum setback required shall be landscaped to provide a buffer to the 482 abutting Residential District. No structure (primary or accessory) shall be 483 permitted within this landscaped buffer. 484 SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Section 21A.60.020. That Section 21A.60.020 of 485 the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended to include the following terms: 486 Atlas, 5-Acre, And 10-Acre Plats 487 Balcony 488 Bike Lane 489 Bike Path 490 Deck 491 Dwelling, Accessory Unit (Internal) 492 Footprint 493 Non-residential Use 494 Porch 495 Rooftop Patio LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 496 Short Term Rental 497 Transit Route 498 Uplighting 499 SECTION 11. Amending the Text of Section 21A.62.040. That definitions of the terms 500 "Atlas, 5-Acre and 10-Acre Plats", "Balcony", "Bike Lane", "Bike Path", "Deck", "Dwelling, 501 Accessory Unit (Detached)", "Dwelling, Accessory Unit(Internal)", "Footprint", "Non- 502 Residential Use", "Porch", "Rooftop Patio", "Short Term Rental", "Transit Route", and 503 "Uplighting"be added to Section 21A.62.040 and amending the terms "Dwelling, Accessory 504 Unit (ADU)", and"Building Coverage" in Section 2 IA.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code as 505 follows: 506 ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS: A map depicting the subdivisions of land within the 507 City. These plats are a scheme of how the City was originally laid out. The City started with plats 508 A through L, Salt Lake City Survey. As the City expanded its boundaries, 5 acre and 10 acre Big 509 Field Survey Plats were added and then the numbered plats 1 through 76. They show information 510 about streets,public right of ways and, some private right of wad 511 BALCONY: An elevated floor space projecting beyond the exterior walls of a buildingthat h 512 not supported on the ground by posts, columns, or similar supporting structural elements. A 513 balcony shall not be used as a means for entry into a building. 514 BIKE LANE: A division of a road for use by yclists marked off with painted lines or other 515 means. 516 BIKE PATH: A path or road for bicycles and not motor vehicles. May include paths that also 517 allow pedestrian or equestrian access. 518 DECK: A platform sitting above finished grade and supported on the ground. 519 DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU): ^ type- of accessory e thin ; eludes . sidential 520 , eithe 521single 522 523 kitehen, sleeping area, eloset space, and bathroom f4eiliti€s. 524 A type of accessory use that includes a residential unit located on the same lot as a separate 525 principal use, either within the principal structure or within a separate accessory structure. The 526 accessory dwelling unit shall be a complete housekeeping unit with a shared or separate 527 entrance, and separate kitchen, sleeping area, closet space, and bathroom facilities. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 528 DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED): An accessory dwelling unit located wholly 529 within a structure that is accessory to the principal use and buildings on a lot or parcel. 530 DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL): 531 An accessory dwelling unit created: 532 4, within a primary building; and 533 5. for the purpose of offering a long-term rental of 30 consecutive days or longer. 534 BUILDING COVERAGE: That percentage of the lot covered by principal or accessory 535 buildings, including cantilevered portions of the building. 536 FOOTPRINT: The measurement of lot area covered by a building, including cantilevered 537 portions of the building. 538 NON-RESIDENTIAL USE: Lands, buildings or structures or portions thereof used or designed 539 or intended for uses other than a residential use, including, but not limited to, commercial, 540 industrial and institutional uses. 541 PORCH: An unenclosed structure attached to a building, covered by a separate roof, and 542 providing access to an entrance to a building. Similar structures providing access to an entrance 543 other than the primary entrance shall be considered a covered deck when located on a platform 544 that is more than two feet (2') above finished gEa& 545 ROOFTOP PATIO: A portion of a flat roof that is dedicated to occupiable space, or a deck 546 sitting atop a roof. 547 SHORT TERM RENTAL: The use of a dwelling unit or units that are offered for rent or lease 548 for a period less than 30 dqys. 549 TRANSIT ROUTE: A route over which a public transit vehicle travels and that is specifically 550 labeled or numbered for the purpose of picking up and dropping off passengers at regularly 551 scheduled stops and intervals. 552 UPLIGHTING: Lights that have been designed to throw illumination upward. 553 SECTION 12. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 554 first publication. 555 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of 556 2023. 557 558 CHAIRPERSON 559 560 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: LEGISLATIVE DRAF F 561 562 563 CITY RECORDER 564 565 Transmitted to Mayor on 566 567 568 Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. 569 570 571 MAYOR 572 573 CITY RECORDER 574 (SEAL) 575 APPROVED AS TO FORM 576 Bill No. of 2023. salt Lake City Attorney's Office 577 Published: Date: 578 Ordinance Amending Accessory Dwelling Units 579 By: 580 Katherine D.Pasker,Senior City Attorney ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor Q ` j'' and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas irl., Director �r Tel CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL its r 'D'c_2.> 7 7a.58 MST) Date Received: 12/12/2022 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 12/12/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 12/09/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Orion Goff, Deputy Director, Department of Community &Neighborhoods D�70/? C70� Or on C��F Da?�20?)14:33[d ST! SUBJECT: Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Text Amendment (PLNPCM2022-00475) STAFF CONTACT: Michael McNamee, Principal Planner michael.rncnarnecra,slc2ov.com or 801-535-7226 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission and adopt the changes to the Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission voted to initiate a petition at their February 9, 2022 hearing to eliminate the conditional use requirement for detached accessory dwelling units(ADUs)in single-family residential zoning districts. Subsequently,the City Council discussed the amendment during the March 8,2022 work session and provided additional direction to staff. Staff expanded the proposal to include significant revisions of the requirements in the City's current ADU Ordinance, many of which have been identified as impediments to the construction of ADUs in Salt Lake City. In order to address impediments to ADU construction, make ADU requirements easier to understand,and improve the quality of ADU construction,staff revised or introduced the following requirements: SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 1 • Remove conditional use requirement for detached ADUs in single-family zoning districts. • Maximum allowable size of a detached ADU was increased from 650 square feet to 1,000 square feet for residential lots less than 12,000 square feet in size, or 1,200 square feet for other lots. The requirement that ADUs be no larger than 50 percent of the footprint of the principal structure was also removed. This allows for the development of ADUs that can accommodate larger households. • Setbacks from side and rear property lines for a single-story detached ADU were changed from 4 feet to 3 feet. For second-story and two-story ADUs above 17 feet in height, setbacks were changed so that the increase in setback is commensurate with the increase in height. This is a significant change from the existing 10 foot setback required for all two-story ADUs. • Introducing ADUs as a permitted accessory use to duplex, multi-family, and non- residential properties, expanding the number of properties where they could be built. Currently, ADUs are only permitted on properties with a single-family home as the principal use. • Where detached ADUs are located near public alleys, the proposal includes requirements to activate the alley, with the goal of making alleys more useful and safer public spaces. • In order to create consistency and ease of future reviews, staff included new definitions of short term rental, deck/porch/balcony,bike lane/path, non-residential use, and more. • The proposed amendment leaves a requirement for one parking stall to be provided for an ADU in place, and adds the following circumstances under which the requirement to provide an off-street stall can be waived: o The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off-street parking requirement. o The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking requirement. o The property is within one-half mile of a designated bicycle lane or path. Staff also revised the land use tables to permit ADUs in zoning districts outside of the residential zones,but where other types of residential uses are allowed. Currently, ADUs are permitted in 19 zoning districts and allowed as a conditional use in 6 zoning districts. Under the proposal, ADUs would be permitted in 7 of the 7 commercial districts, 4 of the 4 Transit Station Area (TSA) districts, 4 of the 4 Form-Based (FB) districts, 4 of the 4 Downtown districts, and the Gateway Mixed-Use District. In total, ADUs would be permitted by right in 45 of the City's 54 zoning districts. They would continue to be prohibited in zones where no other residential uses are currently permitted. On pages 2-5 of the staff report, there is a discussion of how specific zoning districts would be affected, as well as maps comparing where ADUs are currently permitted to where they would be permitted under the changes. Staff also adjusted the limitation on accessory structure size in the FR, R-1, R-2 and SR zoning districts. The size limitation will no longer be 720 square feet or 1000 square feet for duplexes,but rather would be limited to 50% of the rear yard and the maximum lot coverage for the zoning district if located within the buildable area. The Planning Commission considered the request in a public hearing on September 14, 2022 and recommended the City Council approve the proposed amendment. As part of their 2 recommendation, they included a condition that the maximum allowable size of a detached ADU be increased from what was proposed by staff. The proposal originally had called for a maximum size of 720 square feet for a detached ADU, an increase from the currently adopted ordinance, which allows for up to 650 square feet. In order to accommodate more family-sized ADUs, the Planning Commission added a condition that the maximum allowable size be increased to 1,000 square feet. That maximum would apply to lots in residential zoning districts that are 12,000 square feet in size or less. On other lots, the maximum size would be 1,200 square feet, which is unchanged from the original proposal. PUBLIC PROCESS: Community Council Notice: A notice of application was sent to all recognized community organizations on May 18, 2022, per City Code Chapter 2.60 with a link to the online open house webpage. The recognized organizations were given 45 days to respond with any concerns or to request staff to meet with them and discuss the proposed zoning amendment. The 45-day public engagement period ended on July 5, 2022. Staff presented to the Sugar House and Yalecrest Community Councils at their request.After the Planning Commission hearing, staff also presented to the East Liberty Park Community Organization at their request. Public Open House: An online open house was held from May 17, 2022, to September 14, 2022. Fourteen written comments were submitted to the Planning Division after the publication of the staff report. Those comments have been included in Exhibit 5. Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 14,2022. The public hearing was posted on the Planning Division website,the Utah Public Notice website, and shared through the Planning Division email listserv. No entities have requested mailed notice of this proposal and no mailed notice was provided. Written comments were provided to the Planning Commission. There three public comments made during the public hearing. The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are linked in this document. The Commission voted 7-2 to forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council with the condition that the maximum allowable size of an ADU be increased from 720 square feet to 1,000 square feet. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of September 14, 2022 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of September 14, 2022 (Click to Access) c) 2022 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3) Ordinance 4) Memorandum to the Planning Commission Serving as Record of Decision to Initiate Petition 3 5) Public Comment Received after Planning Commission Staff Report was Published 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS: L CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORDINANCE 4. MEMORANDUM TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 5. PUBLIC COMMENT 5 L CHRONOLOGY 6 ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor Q ` j'' and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas irl., Director �r Tel PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2022-00475 February 9,2022 Petition initiated by the a vote of the Planning Commission. May 12,2022 Petition assigned to Michael McNamee,Principal Planner. May 17,2022 Application posted for the online open house. May 18,2022 Notice mailed to all Community Councils. September 2,2022 Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. September 8,2022 Staff report posted to Planning's website. September 14,2022 Planning Commission Meeting and Public Hearing: A positive recommendation was forwarded to City Council with one condition. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 7 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 8 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2022-000475. The Planning Commission voted on February 9, 2022 to initiate a petition to amend the City's ADU Ordinance. The proposed code revisions would eliminate the conditional use requirement for detached ADUs in single-family residential zones. They would also aim to lower zoning barriers to construction of ADUs in general. The proposed changes would seek to strike a better balance between encouraging construction of ADUs and mitigating impacts to neighboring properties. (Staff Contact: Michael McNamee at 801-535-7226) As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the city Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak.The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TBD TIME: 7:00 PM PLACE: *Electronic and In-Person Options City and County Building Room 326 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street,Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.sic.gov/council/vir°tual-mectings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments(�,,,,slcgov.corn. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Michael McNamee at 801-535-7226 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail or micliael.mcnamee(cr)slc�-rov.com. The application details can be accessed at hops:llcitizenportal.slc-lov.coml, by selecting the "planning" tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2022-00475. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at colincil.comments(c%slc�,,ov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 9 3. ORDINANCE 10 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 202_ 3 4 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 2 1 A of the 5 Salt Lake City Code pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations) 6 7 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21 A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 8 to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475 pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations. 9 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission ("Planning Commission")held a 10 public hearing on September 14, 2022 to consider a petition submitted by the Planning 11 Commission (Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475) to amend various sections of Title 21 A of the 12 Salt Lake City Code pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations; and 13 WHEREAS, at its September 14, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor 14 of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council") on said 15 petition; and 16 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 17 adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 19 20 SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That Section 21 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 22 Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the use 23 category "Dwelling, accessory unit"in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential 24 Districts, which use category shall read and appear in that table as follows: 25 11 � a' � a cC a M ►� a �. a fs, p., � � � �' p., A �i � � M at O � M O �" F�. C (�, O (� � N � `T � � M i a I� � N W a v� L� a A� l� � a o �i � � � � � o �� W � � � , � �,� C4 N � .-. O � �) w � O �i � �� � N � �� M d' hA � � � O .� � � � N ti, U •^� � Q � � � N N LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 28 SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 29 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 30 Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use 31 subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 32 Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in 33 alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District CN CB CS' CC CSHBD' CG SNB Dwelling: Accessory P P P P P P P 34 35 SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.035. That Section 36 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 37 Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a 38 new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit"in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 39 Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that 40 table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Dwelling: Accessory P P P P P P P P unit 41 42 SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake CitE Code Section 21 A.33.050. That Section 43 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 44 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use 13 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 45 subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 46 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in 47 alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Dwelling: Accessory unit P P PP 48 49 SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.060. That Section 50 21A.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 51 Conditional Uses in the Gateway District) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use 52 subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 53 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in 54 alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: 55 Use G-MU Dwelling: Accessory unit P 56 57 SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21 A.33.070. That Section 58 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 59 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new 60 use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit"in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 61 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in 62 alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: 63 14 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Permitted Uses By District Use FB- FB-UN2 FB-SC FB-SE UN1 Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P 64 65 SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.050.13.2. That 66 Subsection 21A.40.050.13.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and 67 Structures: General Yard, Bulk and Height Limitations) shall be and hereby is amended to read as 68 follows: 69 2. Building Coverage: 70 71 a. In the FR,R-1,R-2 and SR residential districts the vEi ff+,.,,building eovefage of all 72 maximum footprint of any accessory building, e�ielt a"„g hoop heiises n eftha,,ws ara 73 , shall not exceed fifty 74 percent(50%)of the building footprint of the principal structure ,,,,,m of 75 seven htHidr-ed vv�,enly(720) square feet fef a single family dwelling a*d one thettsand 76 The,,,,,v;,,,,,,,, f t,,,.:,,, for- 77 aeeessefy stndetttfe w4hiii 78 79 aeeessefy stndetttfe. except as follows: 80 81 LI) Notwithstanding the size of the footprint of the principal building,at least 480 square 82 feet of accessory buildingcoverage overage shall be allowed subject to the compliance with all 83 other requirements in Section 21A.40.050. 84 Accessory buildings constructed within the buildable area that are located between the 85 rear fagade of the principal building and the rear yard setback may exceed 720 square 86 feet provided the building is located entirely within the buildable area and the property 87 complies with the maximum buildingcge requirements of the underlying zoning oning 88 district. 89 (3) The buildingcge for a detached accessory dwelling unit shall be subject to the 90 standards in 21 A.40.200,regardless of the buildin cage requirement in this 91 section. 92 (4) An accessory building that contains an accessory dwelling unit on the second level 93 may exceed the maximum coverage up to the footprint of the accessory dwelling unit. 94 95 b. The combined coverage for all hoop houses, greenhouses, and cold frames shall not 96 exceed thirty five percent(35%)of the building footprint of the principal structure. 15 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 97 SECTION 8.Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.40.200. That Section 98 21A.40.200 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Accessory Uses,Buildings and Structures: Accessory 99 Dwelling Units) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 100 21A.40.200: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: 101 102 . 103 104 105 fesidelitial deN,elopment-, 106 ; 107 , a"d the 109 , an 110 families seeking s a»or]4A11'4pJ40.ds; 111 , 112 gfown ehild. in theif homes and neighbefhoods, and obtain e 113 .11tifity, eempanionship, and se . 114 6. Weaden the fange of affordable hottsing thfotighout the City; 115 7. Sttppoi4 stistainability obj eetives by inefeasing hattsiiig elase to jobs, seheals, an 116 ; 117 118 �;�• ,, a 119 . 120 . 121 122 " shall mean the 123 fellewang 124 125 , 126 2. Any pefson who is felated by blood, maffiage, adoption to an individtiai who is listed 127 ; 128 3. An individual who is a tf+tstof of a family tfust who possesses legal ownef ship of t 129 p 130 131 , 132 " , of this title and subjeet to eamplianee with the applieable pfovisi 133 of this 134 D. Methods Of Cfeatiew An aeeessofy ",elling unit may be efeated thfough, but not 135 : 136 137 1. Convei4ing existing living afea within a single family &A,elling as an addition to a" 138 , 139 st,.uetief • 16 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 140building, 141 , 142 143 . 144 145 1. Genefal Requifeffients Applieable To All Aeeessefy Dwelling Units: 146 147 a. One Pef Lot: City ffia�,pefffiit one aeeessofy dwelling unit fof eaeh lot th-all 149 b. Not A Unit Of Density: Aeeessefy dwelling units afe not eonsidef ed a linit of 150 151 pfopei4y. 152 153 froffi the pfineipal dwelliog unit of lot unless eoffipliantwith subdivisi 154 fe-gu 155 d. Owiief Oeetipafley: 156 157 158 159 , 160 , 161 162 qtfalify f r this o rtio ,). , 163 , assisted living f4eility Of 164 165 living f,ditties nities 166 167 e. Ntiffibef Of Residents.: 168 dwellin liflit may not exeee the numvei allowed f ,. a "f niil " as defined in 169 seEtion 21A.62.040, "nefiffitioffs-Of Tef:ffis",of tls title. 170 172 173 174 between the pfopefty line with an adjaeent stfeet and a legally loeated og stfeet 175 176 177 feet (20') deep by eight feet (9') wide. The pafki 178 waived if--. 179 180 (1) Legally located on stfeet pai4ing is available along the street ffontage of the 181 subjeet pfopefty; of 182 183 17 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 184 2. Additional Requir-ements Fof Accessofy Dwelling Units Located Within A Single 185 Family Dwelling: Aeeessofy dwelling units loeatedwithin a single family dwelling 187 188 ,ftpA 189 190 191 . 192 193 (500%) of the gfess sqttafe footage of the single family dwelling. The 194 195 196 habitable spaee below the gafage' 19? 198 within a single family dwelling shall only be peffnitted in the following loeatiofis. 199 200 (1) An o ;s,;fig o,,, ..,fl o , the single family ,a.t.o>>;,,g; 201 , the en�fanee 202 ' 203 fae:de; 204 205 ; 206 20? entfy to the buildifig and afe exempt ffeffi stibseetiefi 21A.24.01014, "Side 208 Ertf,Buildings", of this title. , 210 (6) hoea4ed in a side yafd pfevided the side yafd is at least eight feet (82) ifl.. 211 212 intothe side. ,,.a 213 214 215 216 building of as an addition to an existing aeeessefy building shall eemply with the 21? 219 220 221 , bulk, and 222 223 224 oveflay zoning district unless other-wise fegulated by this seetion. An aeeessofy 225 226 22? 228 eentaining an aeeessefy dwelling unit shall not have a footpr-ifit that is gfeate 229 ° , and shall no 18 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 230 231 aeeessofy dwelling unit and an), othef peftnitted aeeessofy use shall eomply With 232 21A.40.050 of this ehapt 233 b. 234 235 distr; t „hieheye f ; mofe ostfi tiw 236 237 loea4ed between the feaf wall of the single family dwelling and the feaf pfopei4y 238 239 240 (1) Shall be loeated aFainimum often feet (10') ffofn the single family ",ell;,i,t 241 242 pfepei4y. 243 (2) Side and feaf ya.d setbaeks 244 245 ' 246 fofn any side , feaf lot line 247 248 . if an 249 existing aeeessofy building ineludes an addition, all of of poi4ions of the 250 251 252 be altefed to eomply with the applieable seetions of the adopted Fife code 253 of the City. 254 255 256 257 258 259 if the side of feaf lot line is adjaeent to an alley, the sethaek ffia�,be 260 261 262 a Building Height: 263 264 (1) The maxifntim height of a aeeessofy buildinge t.,; ;.. o 265 dwellifig ttt14 shall fiot exeeed the height of�he single fafflily dwelling Ofi 266 . 267 268 269 in 270 Faay be equal to the height-4 the single family dwelling +10 . 271 272 ' 273 274 side of Y-eaf pfopei4j, line. The setbaek fof additional height may be r-edttee 275 19 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 277 buildingswith a pitehed foof and to the top of the foof line f6f a fW foof, 278 279 e. 280 281 282 . 283 . The entfanee to an aeeessofy dwelling unit in an aeeessof� 284 bttilding shall be loeate& 285 286 287 288 289 . 290 (3) Extefiof staifs leading to an entfanee shall be loeated a minimum of ten feet 291 ' 292 pfopefly line is adjaeent to an alley in whieh ease the minifritim setbaek for-the 293 . 294 295 296 . 297 298 (1) Windows shall be no larger-than neeessafy to eomplywith the mi 299 Bttilding Code feqttifeffiefits f6f egfess whefe feqttifed. Skylights, elefestefy 300 , of obseiifed glaAng shall be used when f4eing a side of Y-ea 301 pfopefty line to eomply with minimum Building Code fequifements fef aif 302 ' 303 pfopefty line tifiless the side of feaf pfopefty line is adjaeent�o aft alley. (2) Rv � i oetion E3g(1\ f this do windows hall 304 ���Ee�t-�s-r��� s����-,�-g��Ts������,-� 305 306 .,l Stfuetiife 307 308 309 . 310 Existing windows loeated A-.n aasee-ond level withi.- --- existing aeeessofy 311 buildifig shall be bfatt& into eeffipiianee with this seetion. 312 313 : 314 315 316 level of the b,,,lain,; 317 ' 318 ; 319 (3) Rooftop ao vs . ,.,,hib toa 320 20 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 321 F. 322 shall eomply with the following: 323 324 1. Appliea4iaii: 325 326 a. Zoning Ceftifieate: Apply fof a zoning eeftifieate in aeeofdanee with ehapte 327 21A.08 of this title. 328 329 330 be issued until a zoning eeffifieate is issued. A zoning eei4ifieate .-., be 331 s, o,a .,t the same time as the � f to f,,,octane, if � f to � -iZ-rtirc�v'�-Q� -iZ-reuc�v-r 332 eeettpafiey is not feEltiifed, 333 n D r being , od 334 335 either-the n D T or the single family dwelling, the ov, Q-b,.11 be o ollv.l ; 336 "Business 337 Licenses And Regelations", . 338 339 b. Building Pefmit. Apply fef and obtain a building pefmit fef the pfop 340 aeeessofy dwelling unit, fegafdless of method of efeation, 341 342 343 pfopefly. The doetimentation shall include any legal doeument that demonstfates 344 . 345 346 2. Deed Restfietion: 347 shall have a deed f estfietion, the fofm of whiek shall be a-ppfeved by the" 348 Attofney, 349 . 350 351 abandoned of fevoked. 352 353 354 355 fel.,tiyes of the r o,.ty 356 357 G. 358 this seetion, the wwnef shall femove those feattifes of the aeeessofy dwelling tinit tha4 359 . 360 Division 361 , address of eaeh unit fof which an application 'was 362 , 363 showing appfoved aeeessofy dwelling units. The fepeft shall be tfansmitted to the City 364 f''.,,,,,e;1 by Febf afy l 5tt, f r the r 365 21 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 366 A. Purpose: the regulatory pgMose of this section is to Promote an increase in the housing 367 stock within the citypromote housing choices by allowingand nd regulating accessory 368 dwellingu (ADUs). 369 370 B. Conflicting Regulations. If a regulation found in this section is in conflict with an 371 gpplicable regulation in the base zoning district, overlay district, or provision of general 372 applicability, the regulation in this chapter shall take precedence, with the following 373 exceptions: 374 375 1. The regulations set forth in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; and 376 2. The Special Foothills Regulations set forth in Subsection 21A.24.010.P of this title. 377 C. Owner Occupancy Required. The owner of the property, as defined in this section, shall 378 reside on the property. For the purposes of this title, "owner occupant" shall mean the 379 following: 380 381 1. An individual who is listed on a recorded deed as an owner of the property; 382 2. Any person who is related by blood,marriage,adoption to an individual who is listed on 383 recorded deed as an owner of the property; or 384 3. An individual who is a trustor of a family trust who possesses legal ownership of the 385 propeM. 386 4. Exceptions: 387 388 a. Owner occupancy is not required for an ADU located on a property with a principal 389 use as a duplex,multi-family dwelling,or non-residential land use.A single-family 390 dwelling with an attached ADU does not constitute a duplex. 391 b. The owner has a bona fide,temporary absence of three(3)years or less for activities 392 such as military service,temporary job assignments, sabbaticals,or voluntary service 393 (indefinite periods of absence from the dwelling shall not qualify for this exception 394 or 395 c. The owner is placed in a hospital,nursing home,assisted livingf acilily or other 396 similar facility that provides regular medical care, excluding retirement living facilities 397 or communities. 398 D. Number of Allowed ADUs: A single ADU is allowed on a property where permitted in 399 Chapter 21A.33 of this title. 400 401 E. Location on property. An ADU is allowed in the following locations on a property as 402 indicated below: 403 404 1. Internal ADUs shall be located within the buildable area of the property. 405 2. A detached ADU shall be allowed as indicated in the table below: 406 407 408 22 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Front yard Not ermitted Corner Side yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is no closer to the corner side property line than the rind al structure. Interior Side yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is located behind the rear fa ade of the principal buildin . Rearms Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below. Buildable area Permitted Notes 1. The use of the term_yard in this section shall be interpreted to mean a required yard indicated in the underlying zoning district. 409 410 3. A detached ADU shall be placed at a minimum distance from property lines as indicated 411 below: Rear property line 3' Side propKqy line 3' Corner Side property line 10' Notes: 1. Additions to an existing accessory building shall comply with the setbacks in this table. This includes additions that add a second story. 2. An existing accessory building that is being converted to an ADU may maintain the existing setbacks of the accessory building. If a conversion includes an expansion (including_ adding dding a second story) the expansion shall comply with all applicable setback requirements in this table and in Subsection 21A.40.200.F. 412 413 414 F. ADU Building Height: 415 416 1. The maximum building height for a detached ADU is 17 feet, subject to the following 417 exceptions: 418 419 a. Heighty be increased up to 24 feet for a pitched roof or 20 feet for a flat roof 420 provided the side and rear yard setbacks are increased one foot for each additional foot 421 in building height above 17 feet. The setback does not need to be increased above the 422 minimum indicated in Section E on the side of an ADU that abuts an alley_ or on the 423 side of an ADU that abuts a property that is in a zoning district other than those listed 424 in Chapter 21A.24 of this title. 425 b. Converting ally existing accessory building is permitted when the existing 426 accessory building exceeds the permitted height of this section. 427 c. When an ADU is located fully within the buildable area of the property,the height of 428 the ADU is allowed up to the permitted height of the principal building in n the 429 underlyingzoning oning district. 23 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 430 d. Solar Panels attached to the roof of an ADU are Permitted to exceed the maximum 431 height of the structure uP to four feet. 432 433 2. Building height for a detached ADU shall be measured in the same manner as the height 434 for the Principal building. 435 3. An intemal ADU is subject to the same height_ requirements as the principal building. 436 G. ADU Parking: 437 438 1. The number of parkin stalls talls provided for the principal use shall not be reduced below the 439 minimum identified in Chapter 21A.44 of this Title in order to accommodate an ADU. 440 One parking stall is required for the ADU, except as indicated below: 441 442 a. The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off street parking requirement; 443 b. The prope . already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking 444 requirement for the principal use; 445 c. The property is within a'/a mile radius of a public transit stogy 446 d. The property is within'/2 mile of a ci . -designated bicycle lane or path; or 447 e. The City allows on-street parking along the street frontage of the property and there is 448 a minimum,uninterrupted curb length which meets city requirements to accommodate 449 at least one on-street parkin stall. tall. 450 H. Regulation of Decks, Patios, and Outdoor Space for Detached ADUs: 451 452 1. Decks more than 2 feet above the existing grade are prohibited unless the ADU is located 453 within the buildable area of the lot in which case the deck shall be subject to the same 454 regulations for decks that apply to the principal building. 455 2. Rooftop patios on a detached ADU are prohibited. 456 3. Patios are permitted. A patio may be covered with a roof provided the square footage of 457 the roof is no larger than 120 square feet and the covered patio complies with the setbacks 458 required of the ADU. A covered patio shall not count towards the maximum square 459 footage requirement of the ADU,but does count towards the total buildingcoverage overa eg of the 460 lot. 461 4. Balconies on ADUs: a balcony is permitted on a building containing an ADU provided 462 the balcony does not extend into a required ADU setback and extends no further than 5 463 feet from an exterior wall of the ADU. Balconies shall not contain HVAC equipment no 464 be used as storage areas. 465 5. Intemal ADUs shall be subject to the same standards for decks,patios,and other 466 encroachments that apply to the principal building and use. 467 I. ADUs located alongaa public alley. A detached ADU that is located within 15 feet of a 468 public alley shall include the following 469 470 1. An exterior light shall be located on the exterior wall of the ADU to illuminate portions of 471 the alley adjacent to the ADU. The lighting fixture shall be shielded, oriented and 24 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 472 designed to direct light down and avoid light Pollution onto adjacent Properties. All 473 uplighting is prohibited. 474 2. A 4' wide path from the alley to the entrance of the ADU shall be provided. If there is a 475 fence between the ADU and the alley, a gate shall be provided,and the path shall lead to 476 the gate. If the ADU is located within 15 feet of two or more public alleys,this 477 requirement shall only oply to one of the alley 478 3. An ADU located on an alley that exists on the recorded plat maps or Atlas Plats of the city 479 but has not been used for vehicular access or is otherwise blocked by encroachments such 480 as fences or vegetation are exempt from this requirement. 481 482 J. ADU Gross Floor Area: 483 484 1. Detached ADU.None may exceed 1,000 square feet in gross floor area,except that a 485 maximum of 1,200 square feet in gross floor area shall be allowed when the subject 486 ro er : 487 488 a. Is in a zoning district other than those listed in Chapter 21A.24 of this title; 489 b. Exceeds 12,000 square feet in lot area; or 490 c. Is part of a planned development that includes a minimum of four dwelling 491 492 2. Internal ADU.There is no maximum gross floor area provided the building complies with 493 all applicable standards in the underlyingzoning oning district. 494 3. Gross floor area for a detached ADU shall be calculated as follows: 495 496 a. When the building includes other allowed accessory uses,only, t�quare footage 497 dedicated to the ADU shall be counted. 498 b. When the ADU is on a second level, stairs and required landings providing access to 499 the ADU shall not be counted. 500 c. Loft space with a ceiling height lower than 7 feet within an ADU shall not be counted 501 towards the total square footage of the ADU. 502 d. Basements shall not count towards the maximum gross floor area of the ADU, so long 503 as: 504 505 i. The basement is only used for storage or a use permitted by section 21A.40.040.E 506 of this chapter; and 507 ii. There is no internal circulation between the ADU and the basement. 508 K. Second Story Windows. Windows on the second story of a detached ADU are prohibited 509 on an exterior wall that is adjacent to a side or rear property line unless: 510 511 1. The window is a clerestory window where the bottom of the window is at least 6 feet 512 above the finished floor of the second story; 513 2. The window is on a wall that faces an elevation of the principal building; 514 3. The window faces and is at least 10 feet from a side or rear grope . line; 25 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 515 4. The exterior wall is adjacent to an alley; or 516 5. The window faces a side or rear Property line that is adjacent to a property in a zoning 517 district that permits commercial uses or a property that contains a nonresidential use. 518 L. Maximum Building Coverage. Accessory dwelling units are subject to the maximum 519 building and yard coverage requirements of the applicable zoning and overlay districts. 520 521 M. Building Permit Required. A building permit is required to establish any ADU in the 522 city. All ADUs are required to comply with all adopted applicable codes including 523 not limited to building, fire, and public utilities. 524 525 N. Administrative Regulations: the following administrative regulations are intended to 526 provide direction on applying and interpretin t�gulations of this chapter. 527 528 1. There is no minimum lot size required for an ADU. 529 2. An ADU does not count towards the density allowed in the underlyingzoning district. 530 3. ADUs that have been approved prior to Olmomm, as part of a conditional use are 531 considered legal conforming uses and may be modified if the modification complies with 532 the requirements of this section and any other applicable standard of this title. 533 O. Zoning Certificate and Good Landlord Pro r 534 535 1. A certificate of occupancy for the ADU shall not be issued until a zoning certificate is 536 issued.A zoning certificate may be issued at the same time as the certificate of occupanc. 537 If a certificate of occupancy is not required,the zoning certificate shall be issued prior to 538 the ADU being occupied. 539 2. If a business license is required for the rental of the ADU,the owner shall be enrolled in 540 the landlord/tenant initiative program as defined in Title 5, "Business Taxes,Licenses And 541 Regulations",of this code prior to issuing a zoning certificate. 542 P. Restrictive Covenant: An ADU that is required to be owner occupied shall have a 543 restrictive covenant filed against the property on which the ADU is located, which 544 restrictive covenant shall include the following information: 545 546 1. A description of the primary dwelling and the ADU,including whether the ADU is within 547 the principal structure or a detached structure,the square footage of both the primary 548 dwelling and the ADU, and how off-street parking is allocated between the primary 549 dwelling and the ADU. 550 2. A statement that the ADU may only be used and occupied in accordance with the 551 qpplicable regulations adopted in the Salt Lake Ci . Code. 552 3. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office 553 against the subject property. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be provided to the 554 planning division and attached to the building permit record prior to final inspection of the 555 ADU. If no final inspection is required,the copy of the recorded covenant shall be 556 provided prior to occupying the ADU. 26 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 557 Q. Use Regulations: 558 559 1. An ADU shall not be rented as a short term rental as defined in Section 21.A.62.040. 560 2. An ADU may include any home occupation authorized by this title. 561 3. An ADU may be converted to any other accessory use that is allowed in the zoning 562 district. 563 4. An ADU cannot be converted to another principal use. 564 565 SECTION 9.Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.60.020. That Section 566 21A.60.020 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: List of Terms: List of Defined Terms)shall be and 567 hereby is amended to add the following terms in the list of defined terms to be inserted into that list in 568 alphabetical order: 569 Atlas, 5-acre, and 10-acre plats. 570 Balcony. 571 Bike lane. 572 Bike path. 573 Deck. 574 Dwelling, accessory unit internal), 575 Footprint. 576 Non-residential use. 577 Porch. 578 Rooftop patio. 579 Short term rental. 580 Transit route. 581 Uplighting. 582 583 SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section 584 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms), shall be and 585 hereby is amended as follows: 586 a. Amending the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU)." That the 587 definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU)" shall be amended to read 588 as follows: 27 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 589 DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU): " type of,aces fy e that includes 590 fesidential 591 592 593 , 595 A type of accessory use that includes a residential unit located on the same lot as a 596 separate principal use, either within the principal structure or within a separate accessory 597 structure. The accessory dwelling unit shall be a complete housekeeping unit with a 598 shared or separate entrance, and separate kitchen, sleeping area, closet space, and 599 bathroom facilities. 600 601 602 b. Amending the definition of"BUILDING COVERAGE." That the definition of 603 `BUILDING COVERAGE" shall be amended to read as follows: 604 BUILDING COVERAGE: That percentage of the lot covered by principal or accessory 605 buildings, including cantilevered portions of the building_ 606 607 c. Adding the definition of"ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS." That the 608 definition of"ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS"be added and inserted into 609 the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 610 ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS: a map depicting the subdivisions of land 611 within the City. These plats are a scheme of how the City was on i nally laid out. The 612 City started with plats A through L, Salt Lake City Survey. As the City expanded its 613 boundaries, 5 acre and 10 acre Big;Field Survey Plats were added and then the numbered 614 plats 1 through 76. They show information about streets,public right of ways and, some 615 private right of ways. 616 617 618 d. Adding the definition of"BALCONY." That the definition of"BALCONY"be added 619 and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 620 BALCONY: An elevated floor space projecting beyond the exterior walls of a building 621 that is not supported on the ground by posts, columns, or similar supporting structural 622 elements. A balcony shall not be used as a means for entry into a building_ 623 624 28 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 625 e. Adding the definition of`BIKE LANE." That the definition of`BIKE LANE"be 626 added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 627 BIKE LANE: a division of a road for use by cyclists marked off with painted lines or 628 other means. 629 630 631 f. Adding the definition of"BIKE PATH." That the definition of`BIKE PATH"be 632 added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 633 BIKE PATH: a path or road for bicycles and not motor vehicles. May include paths that 634 also allow pedestrian or equestrian access. 635 636 637 g. Adding the definition of"DECK." That the definition of"DECK"be added and 638 inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 639 DECK: A platform sitting above finished grade and supported on the around. 640 641 642 h. Adding the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED)." That 643 the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED)"be added and 644 inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 645 DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED): An accessory dwelling unit located 646 wholly within a structure that is accessory to the principal use and buildings on a lot or 647 parcel. 648 649 650 i. Adding the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL)." That 651 the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL)"be added and 652 inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 653 DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL 654 An accessory dwelling unit created: 655 1. within a primary dwelling; 656 2. within the footprint of a primary dwelling at the time the internal accessory dwelling 657 unit is created; and 658 3. for the purpose of offering a long-term rental of 30 consecutive days or longer. 29 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 659 660 j. Adding the definition of"FOOTPRINT." That the definition of"FOOTPRINT"be 661 added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 662 FOOTPRINT: The measurement of lot area covered by a building, including cantilevered 663 portions of the building 664 665 666 k. Adding the definition of"NON-RESIDENTIAL USE." That the definition of"NON- 667 RESIDENTIAL USE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical 668 order to read as follows: 669 NON-RESIDENTIAL USE: lands, buildings or structures or portions thereof used or 670 designed or intended for uses other than a residential use, including, but not limited to, 671 commercial industrial and institutional uses. 672 673 674 1. Adding the definition of"PORCH." That the definition of"PORCH"be added and 675 inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 676 PORCH: An unenclosed structure attached to a building, covered by a separate roof, and 677 providing access to an entrance to a building. Similar structures providing access to an 678 entrance other than the primary entrance shall be considered a covered deck when located 679 on a platform that is more than two feet(2') above finished grade. 680 681 682 in. Adding the definition of"ROOFTOP PATIO." That the definition of"ROOFTOP 683 PATIO"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read 684 as follows: 685 ROOFTOP PATIO: A portion of a flat roof that is dedicated to occupiable space, or a 686 deck sitting atop a roof. 687 688 689 n. Adding the definition of"SHORT TERM RENTAL." That the definition of"SHORT 690 TERM RENTAL"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical 691 order to read as follows: 30 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 692 SHORT TERM RENTAL: The use of a dwelling unit or units that are offered for rent or 693 lease for a period less than 30 dam 694 695 696 o. Adding the definition of"TRANSIT ROUTE." That the definition of"TRANSIT 697 ROUTE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to 698 read as follows: 699 TRANSIT ROUTE: a route over which a public transit vehicle travels and that is 700 specifically labeled or numbered for the purpose of picking up and dropping off 701 passengers at regularly scheduled stops and intervals. 702 703 704 p. Adding the definition of"UPLIGHTING." That the definition of"UPLIGHTING"be 705 added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 706 UPLIGHTING: Lights that have been designed to throw illumination upward. 707 708 SECTION 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first 709 publication. 710 711 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of 712 , 202. 713 714 CHAIRPERSON 715 716 ATTEST: 717 718 719 CITY RECORDER 720 721 722 Transmitted to Mayor on 723 724 725 Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. 726 31 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 727 728 729 MAYOR 730 731 732 CITY RECORDER 733 734 (SEAL) 735 736 Bill No. of 202 . 737 Published: 738 739 740 Ordinance amending ADU regulations 741 32 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 202_ (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 2 1 A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 2 1 A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475 pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission ("Planning Commission")held a public hearing on September 14, 2022 to consider a petition submitted by the Planning Commission (Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475) to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations; and WHEREAS, at its September 14, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council("City Council") on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That Section 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the use category "Dwelling, accessory unit" in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts, which use category shall read and appear in that table as follows: 33 °a a z a c� M a oa �, x c� Ax M CK O G M O oa Cl) C � M ♦� N � o boa � o 0 � Oa N r. � O M O � O N 00 GS, N � M d' Q c SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P P P P SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.035. That Section 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Dwelling: Accessory P P P P P P P P unit SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use 35 subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.060. That Section 21A.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use G-MU Dwelling: Accessory unit P SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That Section 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit"in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: 36 Permitted Uses By District Use FB- FB-UN2 FB-SC FB-SE UN1 Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.050.13.2. That Subsection 21A.40.050.13.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: General Yard, Bulk and Height Limitations) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 2. Building Coverage: a. In the FR,R-1,R-2 and SR residential districts the maximum footprint of any accessory building, shall not exceed fifty percent(50%)of the building footprint of the principal structure except as follows: (1) Notwithstanding the size of the footprint of the principal building, at least 480 square feet of accessory building coverage shall be allowed subject to the compliance with all other requirements in Section 21A.40.050. (2) Accessory buildings constructed within the buildable area that are located between the rear fagade of the principal building and the rear yard setback may exceed 720 square feet provided the building is located entirely within the buildable area and the property complies with the maximum building coverage requirements of the underlying zoning district. (3) The building coverage for a detached accessory dwelling unit shall be subject to the standards in 21A.40.200,regardless of the building coverage requirement in this section. (4) An accessory building that contains an accessory dwelling unit on the second level may exceed the maximum coverage up to the footprint of the accessory dwelling unit. b. The combined coverage for all hoop houses,greenhouses, and cold frames shall not exceed thirty five percent(35%)of the building footprint of the principal structure. SECTION 8.Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.40.200. That Section 21 A.40.200 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Accessory Uses,Buildings and Structures: Accessory Dwelling Units)shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 37 21A.40.200: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: A. Purpose: the regulatory purpose of this section is to promote an increase in the housing stock within the city and promote housing choices by allowing and regulating accessory dwelling units (ADUs). B. Conflicting Regulations. If a regulation found in this section is in conflict with an applicable regulation in the base zoning district, overlay district, or provision of general applicability, the regulation in this chapter shall take precedence, with the following exceptions: 1. The regulations set forth in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; and 2. The Special Foothills Regulations set forth in Subsection 21A.24.010.P of this title. C. Owner Occupancy Required. The owner of the property, as defined in this section, shall reside on the property. For the purposes of this title, "owner occupant" shall mean the following: 1. An individual who is listed on a recorded deed as an owner of the property; 2. Any person who is related by blood,marriage,adoption to an individual who is listed on recorded deed as an owner of the property; or 3. An individual who is a trustor of a family trust who possesses legal ownership of the property. 4. Exceptions: a. Owner occupancy is not required for an ADU located on a property with a principal use as a duplex,multi-family dwelling, or non-residential land use. A single-family dwelling with an attached ADU does not constitute a duplex. b. The owner has a bona fide,temporary absence of three(3)years or less for activities such as military service,temporary job assignments, sabbaticals,or voluntary service (indefinite periods of absence from the dwelling shall not qualify for this exception); or c. The owner is placed in a hospital,nursing home,assisted living facility or other similar facility that provides regular medical care,excluding retirement living facilities or communities. D. Number of Allowed ADUs: A single ADU is allowed on a property where permitted in Chapter 21A.33 of this title. E. Location on property. An ADU is allowed in the following locations on a property as indicated below: 1. Internal ADUs shall be located within the buildable area of the property. 2. A detached ADU shall be allowed as indicated in the table below: 38 Front yard Not permitted Corner Side yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is no closer to the corner side property line than the principal structure. Interior Side yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is located behind the rear fa ade of the principal building. Rear yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below. Buildable area Permitted Notes 1. The use of the term yard in this section shall be interpreted to mean a required yard as indicated in the underlying zoning district. 3. A detached ADU shall be placed at a minimum distance from property lines as indicated below: Rear property line 3' Side property line 3' Corner Side property line 10, Notes: 1. Additions to an existing accessory building shall comply with the setbacks in this table. This includes additions that add a second story. 2. An existing accessory building that is being converted to an ADU may maintain the existing setbacks of the accessory building. If a conversion includes an expansion (including adding a second story) the expansion shall comply with all applicable setback requirements in this table and in Subsection 21A.40.200.F. F. ADU Building Height: 1. The maximum building height for a detached ADU is 17 feet, subject to the following exceptions: a. Height may be increased up to 24 feet for a pitched roof or 20 feet for a flat roof provided the side and rear yard setbacks are increased one foot for each additional foot in building height above 17 feet. The setback does not need to be increased above the minimum indicated in Section E on the side of an ADU that abuts an alley or on the side of an ADU that abuts a property that is in a zoning district other than those listed in Chapter 21A.24 of this title. b. Converting a legally existing accessory building is permitted when the existing accessory building exceeds the permitted height of this section. 39 c. When an ADU is located fully within the buildable area of the property,the height of the ADU is allowed up to the permitted height of the principal building in the underlying zoning district. d. Solar panels attached to the roof of an ADU are permitted to exceed the maximum height of the structure up to four feet. 2. Building height for a detached ADU shall be measured in the same manner as the height for the principal building. 3. An internal ADU is subject to the same height requirements as the principal building. G. ADU Parking: l. The number of parking stalls provided for the principal use shall not be reduced below the minimum identified in Chapter 21A.44 of this Title in order to accommodate an ADU. One parking stall is required for the ADU, except as indicated below: a. The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off street parking requirement; b. The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking requirement for the principal use; c. The property is within a%4 mile radius of a public transit stop; d. The property is within'/z mile of a city-designated bicycle lane or path; or e. The City allows on-street parking along the street frontage of the property and there is a minimum,uninterrupted curb length which meets city requirements to accommodate at least one on-street parking stall. H. Regulation of Decks, Patios, and Outdoor Space for Detached ADUs: I. Decks more than 2 feet above the existing grade are prohibited unless the ADU is located within the buildable area of the lot in which case the deck shall be subject to the same regulations for decks that apply to the principal building. 2. Rooftop patios on a detached ADU are prohibited. 3. Patios are permitted. A patio may be covered with a roof provided the square footage of the roof is no larger than 120 square feet and the covered patio complies with the setbacks required of the ADU. A covered patio shall not count towards the maximum square footage requirement of the ADU,but does count towards the total building coverage of the lot. 4. Balconies on ADUs: a balcony is permitted on a building containing an ADU provided the balcony does not extend into a required ADU setback and extends no further than 5 feet from an exterior wall of the ADU. Balconies shall not contain HVAC equipment nor be used as storage areas. 5. Internal ADUs shall be subject to the same standards for decks,patios, and other encroachments that apply to the principal building and use. I. ADUs located along a public alley. A detached ADU that is located within 15 feet of a public alley shall include the following: 40 1. An exterior light shall be located on the exterior wall of the ADU to illuminate portions of the alley adjacent to the ADU. The lighting fixture shall be shielded,oriented and designed to direct light down and avoid light pollution onto adjacent properties. All uplighting is prohibited. 2. A 4' wide path from the alley to the entrance of the ADU shall be provided. If there is a fence between the ADU and the alley, a gate shall be provided, and the path shall lead to the gate.If the ADU is located within 15 feet of two or more public alleys,this requirement shall only apply to one of the alleys. 3. An ADU located on an alley that exists on the recorded plat maps or Atlas Plats of the city but has not been used for vehicular access or is otherwise blocked by encroachments such as fences or vegetation are exempt from this requirement. J. ADU Gross Floor Area: 1. Detached ADU.None may exceed 1,000 square feet in gross floor area, except that a maximum of 1,200 square feet in gross floor area shall be allowed when the subject property: a. Is in a zoning district other than those listed in Chapter 21A.24 of this title; b. Exceeds 12,000 square feet in lot area; or c. Is part of a planned development that includes a minimum of four dwelling units. 2. Internal ADU. There is no maximum gross floor area provided the building complies with all applicable standards in the underlying zoning district. 3. Gross floor area for a detached ADU shall be calculated as follows: a. When the building includes other allowed accessory uses, only the square footage dedicated to the ADU shall be counted. b. When the ADU is on a second level,stairs and required landings providing access to the ADU shall not be counted. c. Loft space with a ceiling height lower than 7 feet within an ADU shall not be counted towards the total square footage of the ADU. d. Basements shall not count towards the maximum gross floor area of the ADU, so long as: i. The basement is only used for storage or a use permitted by section 21A.40.040.E of this chapter; and ii. There is no internal circulation between the ADU and the basement. K. Second Story Windows. Windows on the second story of a detached ADU are prohibited on an exterior wall that is adjacent to a side or rear property line unless: 41 1. The window is a clerestory window where the bottom of the window is at least 6 feet above the finished floor of the second story; 2. The window is on a wall that faces an elevation of the principal building; 3. The window faces and is at least 10 feet from a side or rear property line; 4. The exterior wall is adjacent to an alley; or 5. The window faces a side or rear property line that is adjacent to a property in a zoning district that permits commercial uses or a property that contains a nonresidential use. L. Maximum Building Coverage. Accessory dwelling units are subject to the maximum building and yard coverage requirements of the applicable zoning and overlay districts. M. Building Permit Required. A building permit is required to establish any ADU in the city. All ADUs are required to comply with all adopted applicable codes including but not limited to building, fire, and public utilities. N. Administrative Regulations: the following administrative regulations are intended to provide direction on applying and interpreting the regulations of this chapter. 1. There is no minimum lot size required for an ADU. 2. An ADU does not count towards the density allowed in the underlying zoning district. 3. ADUs that have been approved prior to ,as part of a conditional use are considered legal conforming uses and may be modified if the modification complies with the requirements of this section and any other applicable standard of this title. O. Zoning Certificate and Good Landlord Program: 1. A certificate of occupancy for the ADU shall not be issued until a zoning certificate is issued.A zoning certificate may be issued at the same time as the certificate of occupancy. If a certificate of occupancy is not required,the zoning certificate shall be issued prior to the ADU being occupied. 2. If a business license is required for the rental of the ADU,the owner shall be enrolled in the landlord/tenant initiative program as defined in Title 5, `Business Taxes,Licenses And Regulations", of this code prior to issuing a zoning certificate. P. Restrictive Covenant: An ADU that is required to be owner occupied shall have a restrictive covenant filed against the property on which the ADU is located, which restrictive covenant shall include the following information: l. A description of the primary dwelling and the ADU,including whether the ADU is within the principal structure or a detached structure,the square footage of both the primary dwelling and the ADU,and how off-street parking is allocated between the primary dwelling and the ADU. 2. A statement that the ADU may only be used and occupied in accordance with the applicable regulations adopted in the Salt Lake City Code. 42 3. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office against the subject property. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be provided to the planning division and attached to the building permit record prior to final inspection of the ADU. If no final inspection is required,the copy of the recorded covenant shall be provided prior to occupying the ADU. Q. Use Regulations: I. An ADU shall not be rented as a short term rental as defined in Section 21.A.62.040. 2. An ADU may include any home occupation authorized by this title. 3. An ADU may be converted to any other accessory use that is allowed in the zoning district. 4. An ADU cannot be converted to another principal use. SECTION 9.Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 2 I A.60.020.That Section 21 A.60.020 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: List of Terms: List of Defined Terms)shall be and hereby is amended to add the following terms in the list of defined terms to be inserted into that list in alphabetical order: Atlas, 5-acre, and 10-acre plats. Balcony. Bike lane. Bike path. Deck. Dwelling, accessory unit(internal). Footprint. Non-residential use. Porch. Rooftop patio. Short term rental. Transit route. Uplighting. SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: 43 a. Amending the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU)." That the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU)" shall be amended to read as follows: DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU): A type of accessory use that includes a residential unit located on the same lot as a separate principal use, either within the principal structure or within a separate accessory structure. The accessory dwelling unit shall be a complete housekeeping unit with a shared or separate entrance, and separate kitchen, sleeping area, closet space, and bathroom facilities. b. Amending the definition of"BUILDING COVERAGE." That the definition of "BUILDING COVERAGE" shall be amended to read as follows: BUILDING COVERAGE: That percentage of the lot covered by principal or accessory buildings, including cantilevered portions of the building. c. Adding the definition of"ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS." That the definition of"ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS: a map depicting the subdivisions of land within the City. These plats are a scheme of how the City was originally laid out. The City started with plats A through L, Salt Lake City Survey. As the City expanded its boundaries, 5 acre and 10 acre Big Field Survey Plats were added and then the numbered plats 1 through 76. They show information about streets, public right of ways and, some private right of ways. d. Adding the definition of"BALCONY." That the definition of"BALCONY"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: BALCONY: An elevated floor space projecting beyond the exterior walls of a building that is not supported on the ground by posts, columns, or similar supporting structural elements. A balcony shall not be used as a means for entry into a building. 44 e. Adding the definition of"BIKE LANE." That the definition of`BIKE LANE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: BIKE LANE: a division of a road for use by cyclists marked off with painted lines or other means. f. Adding the definition of"BIKE PATH." That the definition of"BIKE PATH"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: BIKE PATH: a path or road for bicycles and not motor vehicles. May include paths that also allow pedestrian or equestrian access. g. Adding the definition of"DECK." That the definition of"DECK"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: DECK: A platform sitting above finished grade and supported on the ground. h. Adding the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED)." That the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED)" be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED): An accessory dwelling unit located wholly within a structure that is accessory to the principal use and buildings on a lot or parcel. i. Adding the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL)." That the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL)"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL): An accessory dwelling unit created: 1. within a primary dwelling; 2. within the footprint of a primary dwelling at the time the internal accessory dwelling unit is created; and 3. for the purpose of offering a long-term rental of 30 consecutive days or longer. 45 j. Adding the definition of"FOOTPRINT." That the definition of"FOOTPRINT"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: FOOTPRINT: The measurement of lot area covered by a building, including cantilevered portions of the building. k. Adding the definition of"NON-RESIDENTIAL USE." That the definition of"NON- RESIDENTIAL USE" be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: NON-RESIDENTIAL USE: lands,buildings or structures or portions thereof used or designed or intended for uses other than a residential use, including, but not limited to, commercial, industrial and institutional uses. 1. Adding the definition of"PORCH." That the definition of"PORCH"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: PORCH: An unenclosed structure attached to a building, covered by a separate roof, and providing access to an entrance to a building. Similar structures providing access to an entrance other than the primary entrance shall be considered a covered deck when located on a platform that is more than two feet(2') above finished grade. in. Adding the definition of"ROOFTOP PATIO." That the definition of"ROOFTOP PATIO" be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: ROOFTOP PATIO: A portion of a flat roof that is dedicated to occupiable space, or a deck sitting atop a roof. n. Adding the definition of"SHORT TERM RENTAL." That the definition of"SHORT TERM RENTAL"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 46 SHORT TERM RENTAL: The use of a dwelling unit or units that are offered for rent or lease for a period less than 30 days. o. Adding the definition of"TRANSIT ROUTE." That the definition of"TRANSIT ROUTE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: TRANSIT ROUTE: a route over which a public transit vehicle travels and that is specifically labeled or numbered for the purpose of picking up and dropping off passengers at regularly scheduled stops and intervals. p. Adding the definition of"UPLIGHTING." That the definition of"UPLIGHTING"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: UPLIGHTING: Lights that have been designed to throw illumination upward. SECTION 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of 202. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. 47 MAYOR CITY RECORDER SEAL APPROVED AS TO FORM* Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Bill No. of 202 . Date: Nove ber 1 , 2022 Published: By - — — Paul C. ielson Senior City Attorney *Subject to the adoption date highlighted Ordinance amending ADU regulations(final) in Section 8 being updated before publication. 48 4. MEMORANDUM TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 49 MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT qfCOMMUNITY andNEIGHBORHOODS To: Amy Barry,Chair Salt Lake City Planning Commission Cc: Lisa Shaffer ChiefAdmirustrative Officer Blake Thomas,Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director;Mchaela Oktay,Deputy Planning Director From: Nick Norris,Planning Director Date: May 5,2022 Re: Planning Commission petition initiation to modify the Accessory Dwellmg Unit Regulations On February 9, 2022 the Salt Lake City Planning Division voted to initiate a zoning text amendment that would change the accessory dwelling units from conditional uses to permitted uses across all zoning districts where the use is allowed. The motion the Planning Commission adopted was stated as: I move that the Planning Commission initiate a petition to update the ADU regulations of the city in order to make all ADUs permitted uses and make other necessary changes to do so, including changes to comply with Utah Code changes adopted in 2021 and clarifying applicable standards so they can be administered as permitted uses This memo serves as a record of that decision and will be used to start the process of drafting a proposal that would accomplish the intent of this motion. By signing the document as the chair of the Planning Commission,you are acknowledging that the item was listed on the Feb 9,2022 Planning Commission agenda,that the commission discussed the proposal,and that a motion passed by the Planning Commission initiating the zoning text amendment. Please contact meat 8ol-535-6173 or Wniekk.�norri {atslc o�=.co if you have any questions.Thank you. � Cor� sioxl Chair Date SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 50 5. PUBLIC COMMENT 51 ERIC VALCHUIS 1587 S 1500 E,Salt Lake City,UT 84105 1 1 Michael McNamee Salt Lake City Planning 451 South State Street// Room 406 Salt Lake City,UT 84111-5480 mic�)acl.mcns�nicc�ct slcooti—com RE: Support of the revised Salt Lake City ADU Ordinance Dear Michael, My name is Eric Valchuis and I am writing to support the revised ADU Ordinance which will promote stable homeownership,increase the supply of reliable rental housing,and reduce automobile reliance.To amplify these outcomes,I further encourage the Planning Commission to strike the owner requirement and increase the maximum ADU square footage in the revised ordinance. ADUs are beneficial for cities,homeowners,and renters,an assertion backed up through work I have completed alongside the Terrier Center and the Center for Community Innovation (CCI) at UC Berkeley on ADU su opi ion,L/O nin , and fin)ncc.ADUs are an excellent way of adding density to cities,especially those like Salt Lake City that are dominated by single-family zoning. By increasing density in areas closer to amenities,vehicle miles traveled may be reduced. Many homeowners rent out their ADUs to generate a rental income stream to increase their financial stability. Others rent to family members,caretakers, or friends, increasing quality of life. In building ADUs,homeowners increase the supply of housing which,at the aggregate,can reduce the cost of housing—an important task given the findings of the City's recent'lli6 �in{, in Place study. ADUs are often built in higher wealth areas but more often rented at affordable levels,giving lower-income families the opportunity to live in wealthier areas which has been shown to improve childhood outcomes.' I applaud Salt Lake for having taken steps, and continuing to take steps, to reform codes to lower the barriers to ADU construction. Permitting ADUs on residential and non-residential properties,as would be allowed in the revised ordinance,is an especially forward-leaning provision.The absence of lot size minimums and lenient parking requirements are also hallmarks of an exemplary ADU code. However, there remain shortcomings in the revised ordinance that limit the potential positive impacts that ADUs can have on the city. Most importantly,the owner occupancy requirement increases renter instability;if a homeowner vacates the property,whether by choice or necessity, then the tenant will also be forced to move. Given the city's housing crisis,we know that there are "very limited,if any,housing options available to low-income households after they are displaced.As a result [displaced] families are likely to either leave the city,double up with other households,enter into homelessness, or move out of the region or even state."'Further,the owner occupancy requirement will limit the numbers of ADUs built. Per the .l 17 L' Scorecard, a study published by CCI,an owner occupancy requirement"hinders financial viability for homeowners who need the rental income, or have constraints that prohibit them from living on-site." Given the negative impacts 1 ADUs in wealthier areas.chapple,Karen,David Garcia,F�ric Yalchuis,and lulian'1 uckcr "Reaching California's ADU Potential:Progress to Date and the Need for ADU Finance"Center for Community Innovation and the Terner Center for]lousing Innovation:University of California, Berkeley,August 2020 A 2(2f) 1 ixf Unit affordability:Jake wegmann&Karen Chapple(2014) Hidden density in single family neighborhoods:Backyard cottages as an equitable smart growth strategy,Journal of Urbanism:International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability,7:3,307-329,DOI: 101080/17549175 2013 879453 See table 3 Opportunity for children:https://opportunityinsights org/neighborhoods/ '-"Phase One Summary Report;Thriving in Place:Salt Lake City's Anti-Displacement Strategy July 2022 a ur:)an cment2;r i.b n,_,dr_ is �e .t't lcl>ott% 52 ERIC VALCHUIS 1587 S 1500 E,Salt Lake City,UT 84105 1 1 on tenant stability and the number of potential ADUs that would be built, section C.4. of the revised ordinance should be removed. Secondly,maximum gross floor areas impede the utility of ADUs.The revised ordinance allows for a detached ADU of up to 720 square feet,with limited exceptions. Given typical apartment layouts,720 square feet can accommodate up to one bedroom. For many homeowners and many properties,this is an appropriate number of bedrooms. For other homeowners and properties,this square footage limitation is unnecessarily burdensome.Many homeowners use their ADU to house their grown children and their families or their aging parents and their caretakers. For these situations, a one-bedroom unit is insufficient. One-bedroom apartments are also not the unit-size most in need in Salt Lake City.3 To allow homeowners to construct apartments with at least two bedrooms,the detached ADU maximum gross floor area (Section K.1.) should be increased from 720 to 1,000 square feet. Salt Lake City is rising to the challenge to meet its housing crisis. Adopting the revised ordinance,with the owner occupancy and maximum square footage provisions removed and revised,respectively,is another bold step that the Commission can take. Best regards, Eric Valchuis 3 Ibid The housing crisis is most severe for families,including married couples with children and single parents with children 53 From: To: Planning Public Comments Subject: (EXTERNAL)ADU Amendment comments for the meeting tonight Date: Wednesday,September 14,2022 10:36:35 AM I support more ADU's and making it easier for residents to build them, I agree with most of the requirements but have some concerns about owner occupancy. I understand the issues with enforcement and also the financing issue but other cities have dealt with those issues in positive and creative ways, like working with financial institutions or subsidizing loans, one even allows a 2 year"break" in the requirement. Owner occupancy could be kept now and then re-addressed in a couple of years to allow time to see how it works. If owner occupancy is not approved then there should be resident occupancy rates (2 for a one bedroom and 3 non-related, 4 related for a 2 bedroom ADU). This needs to be enforced with fines for the landlords if they don't comply. Enforcement of maintenance both inside and outside the dwelling(s) must also be taken more seriously. The decline of properties, including landscaping, and too many residents packed into a rental, is detrimental to the neighborhood and our property values. Owners tend to take care of their properties where landlords and developers/investors are typically only concerned with collecting the rent. My experience is that code enforcement can decide whether or not to enforce code. I know that the cost of hiring enforcement officers may not be in the budget so residents need to step up and report issues in their neighborhood. Education and reminders about how to report issues could be done with regular participation from Code Enforcement in the Community Council meetings (much like we do with Police and Fire). This would allow residents to escalate issues if they don't see action on a problem they reported. I would like to see a requirement that the design of a detached ADU matches or complements the exterior of the existing home and not allow "raw" shipping containers or cheap materials. Again, this is to keep the culture of the neighborhoods intact and to maintain property values for homeowners. Yvonne Martinez 54 SLC NEIGHBORS FOR MORE NEIGHBORS September 14, 2022 Michael McNamee, Principal Planner Salt Lake City Planning Division Dear Michael, It is my pleasure to submit this letter on behalf of SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors. We're a newly formed network of SLC neighbors working for housing that is affordable for all income levels through policies that are pro-housing and pro-tenant. We support the proposed es-�q1- because ADUs are an important part of Salt Lake City's housing future. While they are not a silver bullet that can fully meet all of SLC's housing needs, they are a critical part of establishing neighborhood scale infill housing and affordable units. As a simple and affordable option for many people, these units can provide much needed workforce housing, housing for students, and for aging parents. ADUs are also a way to build wealth and opportunity in SLC's neighborhoods by providing every homeowner with the opportunity to participate in incremental development of their neighborhoods. The changes proposed by SLC will make ADUs easier to build. We support this policy as a necessary first step toward incremental density and increased housing in every neighborhood in SLC. Thank you, Turner Bitton, Executive Director SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors 55 Transmittal Full Packet Final Audit Report 2022-12-09 Created: 2022-12-06 By: Katherine Vuong(katherine.vuong@slcgov.com) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAvHZvW6NmxKHSxJFB K1Kkr1d1-tc9nlM "PLNPCM2022-00475 - ADU Changes Transmittal Full Packet" History Document created by Katherine Vuong (katherine.vuong@slcgov.com) 2022-12-06-9:44:48 PM GMT Document emailed to Orion Goff(orion.goff@slcgov.com)for signature 2022-12-06-9:45:27 PM GMT Email viewed by Orion Goff(orion.goff@slcgov.com) 2022-12-07-4:13:05 AM GMT Email viewed by Orion Goff(orion.goff@slcgov.com) 2022-12-09-9:38:23 PM GMT Document e-signed by Orion Goff(orion.goff@slcgov.com) Signature Date:2022-12-09-9:38:40 PM GMT-Time Source:server Agreement completed. 2022-12-09-9:38:40 PM GMT t r, Powered by F Adobe Acrobat Sign Item 134 "oss too, MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO: City Council Members FROM: Allison Rowland Budget and Policy Analyst DATE: March 7,2023 RE: ORDINANCE:THE GLENDALE REGIONAL PARK PLAN MOTION i — CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a later date. MOTION 2 — CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council continue the public hearing on a future date. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O. BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 t COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO: City Council Members Item Schedule: Briefing: February 21,2023, FROM: Allison Rowland March 7,202E Budget&Policy Analyst Public Hearing: March 7, 202E Potential Action:March 21, 2023 DATE: March 7,2023 RE: ORDINANCE:THE GLENDALE REGIONAL PARK PLAN ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will review,and consider adopting,the draft Glendale Regional Park Plan,which aims to provide the guiding vision and design for the future park,as well as establishing a framework for development and programming at the 17-acre site.At full build-out,the project is meant to"represent the unique and diverse culture of the Glendale Community,"serving as a neighborhood park while also providing amenities that create a regional attraction. Like all plans,the Glendale Regional Park Plan sets out aspirations,and the funds for many of the features and activities have not yet been identified.This means that full implementation of the Plan will be contingent on funding availability in the coming years. The Department of Public Lands led the multi-year efforts to prepare the Plan for repurposing the former site of the Glendale Water Park.The Department received Council approval to begin work last summer on"Phase 1" implementation,before the full draft Plan was completed and adopted,because a portion of the park must open by April 2024.This is a requirement of the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund,which originally funded the City's purchase of the site.The Fund requires that active recreation be publicly accessible on-site within three years of beginning to remove existing amenities(see section L below). The full draft of the Glendale Regional Park Plan includes a variety of special considerations because of the complexity of the site.The Plan proposed for Council adoption includes the following items,which are described in more detail in the sections below: • Major park elements at full build-out such as an outdoor pool,splash pad,dog park,and roller skating ribbon,among other features,to be considered in phases as budget becomes available. • Site ecology and restoration. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 • Budget estimates for full build-out,which total$30 million to $50 million,with the acknowledgement this may change given inflation and phasing • Maintenance and management recommendations as well as cost estimates(~$620,000 per year). • Recommendations on future Park programming. • Diversity,equity,and inclusion at the Park. • Proposed improvements to site access. • Goals and metrics for the Park. Previously completed steps in the planning process include site analysis,conceptual planning,extensive public engagement,and reviews by the Council on May 3,and October 4, 2022.Both the Parks,Natural Lands,Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board(PNUT)and the Transportation Advisory Board(TAB)reviewed the Plan and provided letters of support.The Community Advisory Committee formed specifically to guide the development of the Plan,also reviewed the full draft Plan and supports it,as does the Glendale Neighborhood Council. The Plan was also unanimously recommended for approval by the Planning Commission,with"the proviso that the City Council pay special attention to operations,maintenance,security,and staffing for the park as it goes into use." Goal of the briefing:Review the final draft of the Glendale Regional Park Plan and potentially consider adopting it. Page 1 2 ADDITIONAL AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. Key Park Elements at Full Build-Out.The key elements of Glendale Regional Park are described and illustrated in pages 41 and 42 of the draft Plan.They include: 1. Community Gathering and Event Spaces: a promenade/community plaza spanning the north central gateway,an event stage and lawn,smaller pavilions and picnic lawns and a riverside beach and boardwalk. 2. Play Places for Everyone:hiking,walking and paved trails,an all-ages and-abilities playground,climbing features,multi-use sport courts,dog park,and sledding hill. 3. Places to Enjoy the Water: a splash pad,kayak rental,access to the Jordan River for recreation, boat dock and ramp,and an outdoor pool. 4. Places to Wheel Around: an ice/roller skating ribbon,skateboarding area,and bike trails. B. Site Ecology and Restoration.The specific location of the Glendale Regional Park site,along the Jordan River,contributes to the complexity of this project but also offers significant opportunities for ecological restoration.This was evident in the demolition and site preparation phases,which took longer,and cost more,than initially anticipated.In addition,the site had"a high level of impervious surfaces,with 54%of the site being covered in asphalt and concrete."The proposed design would reduce this amount by half through low-impact development practices,using green infrastructure to absorb stormwater and creating additional ecological benefits. To protect critical riparian habitat within the floodplain,improvements proposed in the Plan which fall within ioo feet of the annual high-water line of the Jordan River will follow guidelines outlined in the City's Riparian Corridor Overlay District(RCO): "Development near the river corridor will seek to enhance floodplain functions through riparian restoration. Structures,such as boat ramps or docks,will be built in accordance with RCO zoning ordinances." The Plan's goals include improving wildlife habitat,and it notes that phasing the project's construction will reduce potential impacts to the site's current wildlife population,particularly migratory song birds. Specifically,the many invasive Russian olive trees,which currently serve as habitat for many bird species, will be removed in phases rather than all at once,and new riparian plants will be established among the remaining Russian olives for a number of years before those are removed to allow the new plants to develop into a more sustainable forest. As was noted in previous steps of the Glendale Regional Park planning process,the Department recommends pursuing certification through the Sustainable Sites Initiative(known as SITES),or a similar sustainability program,to support goals for ecological restoration and sustainable park development.The Plan notes that"During the master planning process,a SITES prescore assessment confirmed that the Glendale Park project meets the qualifications to pursue SITES certification.As the project consultant moves into the next design phase,this consideration should be integrated into the process to ensure that sustainable practices are adhered to and that the proper documentation is collected to pursue certification." Projects pursuing certification often incur higher costs in design and construction,however,they consistently return significant long term cost savings related to ongoing operations and maintenance costs. The Plan's Appendix A includes the full SITES prescore worksheet and assessment for Glendale Regional Park. Page 13 C. Budget Estimates.The Glendale Regional Park Plan has been developed using$225,000 approved in a Fiscal Year 2021(FY21)budget amendment.Additional funds became available through the 2022 General Obligation(GO)bond,which was approved by voters last November along with an allocation from CIP in FY 22 and Budget Amendments in FY 21 and 23(see chart below).The Department of Public Lands is working to identify additional funding opportunities,as well. 1. Current Cost Estimates for Full Plan Implementation.Current estimates of the cost for full build-out of Glendale Regional Park as envisioned in the Plan range from$30 million to$5o million.The figures are necessarily imprecise,especially in the current context of relatively high inflation in the construction industry.Funding availability and Department logistics will be key determinants for the speed at which Park construction can proceed.More precise estimates will be possible as detailed construction designs proceed. 2. Project Phasing.The total number of phases needed for build-out will increase overall costs,even if inflation returns to more typical recent levels.This is because cost-efficiency suffers with each new construction phase added.The Phasing Diagram on page 6o of the Plan includes the Department's recommended phasing approach,and includes additional information on phasing considerations, like hazards and safety.This diagram also indicates which of the planned features are most costly. 3. Phase i Costs.The initial estimates for Phase 1 construction ranged from$3.5 million to$5.5 million dollars.The Plan states that this phase"was designed to maximize usable park features and efficiently utilize funding,as it comprises only approximately 1o%of the total park cost yet completes 30%of the full park buildout."(Additional information on Phase 1 can be found in section K below.) 4. Previous Budget Allocations.In recent years,the Council has approved funding for site preparation and Phase 1 implementation through budget amendments and as part of CIP,as follows. FY21 Budget Demolition of the waterpark and related $855,000 Amendment#5 infrastructure.Site preparation for redevelopment. FY21 Budget Preparation of the Glendale Regional Park $225,000 Amendment#6 Plan FY22 CIP Initially for Phase 1 implementation,but most $3.20 Million of this amount had to be used for unexpected demolition and site preparation. FY23 Budget Phase 1 Implementation. $4.35 Million Amendment#4 5. Other Funding Sources.The General Obligation(GO)bond that was approved by City voters in November 2022 is currently slated to provide$27 million for capital improvements for Glendale Regional Park.The Department intends to continue to explore relevant grant,donation,and partnership opportunities. Page 14 6. Ongoing Management and Maintenance Costs. Expected ongoing expenses for full management and maintenance are not provided in the Plan,aside from the Ongoing Programming &Activation Costs noted below.For FY23,the Council agreed to the Administration's request that parks maintenance become eligible for some of the annual Funding Our Future sales tax revenue,with a$2 million dollar allocation for that year. ➢ The Council may wish to ask the Administration for details about how the Funding Our Future allocation was spent in FY23, and whether significant changes in the total amount are expected for coming years. ➢ The Council may wish to discuss the historical subsidy of activation/maintenance at other regional City parks such as Liberty Park(see item D below for additional information on this topic). 7. Ongoing Programming&Activation Cost Estimates.Total annual ongoing costs for the programming and activation of Glendale Regional Park,as designed in the Plan,would be a recommended minimum of$613,000,and inflation will likely affect these costs,as well as the others. See chart below,from page 74 of the Plan. Table 2 Progra erring&Activation Budget Recommended Minimum &8 On site programming manager $76.000 Base starting salary of$60,000 annually-Budget includes fringe benefits. Park attendants $18,200 16 hrs/wkyear round,$17.50wage plus 25%fully loaded. Overtime allowance $4,550 May also be used for discretionary bonuses Administration/insurance - Assumes covered by City Defuses Equipment lsupplies $10.000 Laptop for Manager.suiartphones/tab lets for attendant use,general supplies Arts&culture $80.000 Two-thirds of this cost is annual,cutting edge interactive art installations Fitness $30,000 Mostly provided by free businesses seeking to market their classes Hobbies&niche interests $45.000 Includes outdoor dancing,which is about one- third of the total budget Live entertainment $100,000 Does not include Production costs,which will be minimal Markets&festivals $100.000 Allowance for self produced events Marketing $50.000 Limited to promotion surrounding public space programs and events Holiday decorations $100,000 Allowance UNNEMEMENNEEMENEEM 8. Additional Staffing.As alluded to above,the Plan anticipates that additional Public Lands staff will be needed to"support and activate the park to enhance safety and enjoyment of the space."In addition to recommending one new full-time on-site programming manager, and two part-time,seasonal park"attendants"(see above),in several sections of the Plan there are references to other new tasks recommended for Public Lands staff. It is not clear whether these would require full-time commitment to Glendale Regional Park or could be shared among multiple sites. Examples include: Page 15 a. an operations manager,to oversee capital projects,major repairs,landscape maintenance,and all third-party contractors. b. a dedicated employee for specialized maintenance and repair needs such as fixing plumbing issues,repairing broken stairs,electrical repairs,building maintenance,etc. This employee could oversee multiple parks with appropriate support staff. c. a marketing employee to maintain a dedicated website and social media accounts that are frequently updated with news and happenings.This website would also be a tool for customer service, a guide for private event permitting,and a place to receive inquiries, comments,and complaints. d. a leasing agent who would focus on partnership agreements,either through the relevant City agency or through a park management entity,and would select the appropriate tenants for any kiosks,cafe space,river concessions,and any other commercially operable spaces within the park. 9. A Different Park Budgeting Model? Salt Lake City has traditionally funded its parks system primarily through general fund allocations which department spends according to its own priorities.The proposed Glendale Regional Park Plan recommends a different model for this park, "with a dedicated and predictable budget that grows over time through revenue development. The park should be viewed as a business, with profits and losses,except that all profits should be made with the public interest in mind and, thus, reinvested back into the park for the benefit of local residents and visitors."The Plan includes a graphic and a brief discussion of public/private partnership structure on page 75. ➢ This would be a departure from the City's current park maintenance model, as it is not likely that any park could generate i00%of the revenue needed to staff, program and maintain the space. The Council may wish to discuss the benefits and disadvantages of different funding models,and request information from the Administration about its views on the subject. D. Maintenance and Management Recommendations. Regardless of the funding model,many of the maintenance and management recommendations for Glendale Regional Park,as well as those for its programming(see section D),are predicated on the City's commitment to building a park that serves the neighborhood as well as acting as a regional draw—on par with Liberty Park,for example,though on a much smaller scale."To achieve this high standard, the City will need to make special considerations for Glendale Park's operations staffing required to support the appropriate levels of security,sanitation, public realm maintenance, landscaping,programmatic operations,event needs,park concession leasing, and marketing..."Along with additional Department of Public Lands staff to help meet programming and partnership needs,specific management recommendations include working with key community partners and stakeholders,including organizations that promote inclusivity,equity,and partnerships, and hiring local and minority-owned businesses to program elements of the site(see section D). Recommendations for programming, operations and management in the draft Plan can be found beginning on page 71. A key principle behind this approach is that a park that is well-maintained and clean encourages visitors to treat the park with respect. Park cleanliness will also impact perceptions of safety,which in turn attracts visitors,including families,and increases the overall sense of civic pride and support for the park. Community partnerships are also considered essential to activating the park.Staff note: this may require additional budget considerations beyond typical park maintenance funding. Page 16 The plan also includes some detailed recommendations for Park management and maintenance that might be generalizable to other Public Lands properties as well,like staffing for park sanitation responsibilities or marketing individual parks. ➢ The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether it plans to revamp some of its practices for maintenance for other parks and public lands based on the recommendations in the Glendale Regional Park Plan. E. Recommendations for Future Park Programming.The Plan states that programming and management will be essential to creating a safe community asset.It points out that Salt Lake City residents and visitors are not necessarily accustomed to"robust programming of public spaces,"similar to what is seen in many larger cities,where open space is at a greater premium.It also suggests that"Many parks and plazas have failed to maintain a positive visitor experience because they have not programmed and managed their public realm to exceed local precedents." To achieve better results at Glendale Regional Park,the Plan recommends establishing a Park programming budget to provide equipment,marketing,outreach,and supplies.The proposed on-site programming manager would need to use this budget to leverage programming partners and interested groups to provide donations of time and materials,sponsorships,and other resources.The Plan also suggests that a baseline programming budget from the Department could improve planning and fund- raising for this purpose, and help it grow over time, as a variety of potential revenue sources are developed from philanthropy, sponsorships, event rentals,food and beverage, programming, and government support. (See section B,above for additional information on the proposed budget.) According to the Plan,successful programming of arts,culture,fitness,entertainment,markets,and community festival events has the power to: • define how the park feels. • differentiate it from other parks and destinations. • provide an active and appealing neighborhood anchor. • provide a safe and clean place. • capitalize on Glendale's rich and diverse multicultural environment. • capitalize on Salt Lake City's outdoors orientation. The types of programming the community prefers were pinpointed through the public engagement process (see section J below),and the Plan includes a long list of potential activities that could begin once Phase z is complete.Ideas for additional future programming are also included in the Plan on pages 45 to 47. Potential Phase 1 Programming Children/family Outdoor/environmental Arts/culture/community Family fitness activities Nature/meditative walks Audience area Ail-ability movement Birding/wildlife workshops Outdoor movies Music/literary education Gardens/horticulture Lawn games Organized play activities Public art Animal education events River Programming Arts/culture/community Fitness/recreation/events Safety and awareness Art cart Low impact fitness Skills workshops Arts and crafts Organized recreation/workshops Habitat education Small music/performance Community cultural events Volunteer events Literary events Outdoor hobbyist activities Lectures Board games Sports courts Clinics/lessons All-ability skills training Page 7 The Plan notes that based on its market studies,Glendale Regional Park will best serve users in nearby neighborhoods through low or no cost activities for both adults and children. It emphasizes that forming and maintaining relationships with key community stakeholders,engaging with community organizations that promote inclusivity,equity,and partnerships,and working with local and minority-owned businesses will be the most enduring strategies to supporting programming of the site. F. Diversity, Equity,and Inclusion.The Plan identifies three aspects for an overall program for Glendale Regional Park that would help the City promote equity and ensure the new park is inclusive of all residents: 1. growing minority-owned businesses through concessions and contracts; 2. supporting existing organizations that promote inclusivity and equity through programming partnerships; and 3. partnering with local organizations through internships and job training. Examples of how this program could be implemented can be found on pages 49 to 51 of the Plan. ➢ To better understand the benefits and budget needs of these kinds of programs, the Council may wish to request the Administration provide examples from other cities of how these partnerships unfold in practice. G. Proposed Improvements to Site Access and Connections.The proposed Plan includes recommendations for new connections to trails,better public transportation access,and improved pedestrian crossings at 1700 South.The Park's design deliberately aims to strengthen connections within the neighborhood,including to the 1700 South Park and Glendale Neighborhood Park. It also would facilitate connections to the broader regional park system,with a proposed bridge to the Jordan River Parkway Trail,Glendale Golf Course,and the future Surplus Canal Trail. 1. Transit.The Plan highlights a gap in public transportation access to both Glendale Regional Park and for the broader Glendale neighborhood.The closest rail connection to Glendale Regional Park is the River Trail Station along the Green Line(2340 South 1070 West),which is a 1.3 mile walk. Nearby bus routes do not have stops that are within comfortable walking distance,either.The importance of closing this gap is greater still because the Plan reports that the share of Glendale households without personal vehicles is three to four times higher than it is in the City as a whole. The draft Plan also suggests improving public transportation connections to enhance park access, increase sustainable transportation options,and facilitate park activities and events. 2. Pedestrian and Bicycle Access.The Plan suggests that 1700 South could be narrowed to create safer access to Glendale Regional Park,since vehicle traffic along it is"very low for its width,"and says the Transportation Division is currently evaluating the potential for improvements there related to active transportation.The Plan also proposes an additional crosswalk between the existing ones near 1300 West and at the Jordan River Parkway Trail,which are over 1/4 mile apart. Also,the proposed Surplus Canal Trail would provide a direct connection between the park and residents of western Glendale who currently live beyond a 10-minute walk from a park. ➢ The Council may wish to clarify with the Administration whether or not the proposed site access improvements are included in the Plan's cost estimates for full build-out. ➢ The Council may wish to ask the Administration how work among departments and with organizations outside the City could be facilitated to help resolve some of the barriers to connection for this area of the City. Page 18 H. Goals and metrics for the Park.The section of the draft Plan titled"Goals and Metrics"(pages 53 to 56) focuses on assessing the success of the planning process in meeting the public's goals but does not explicitly address how the fully built-out Park itself might be assessed. It states,"The draft plan also looks at specific metrics,based on the original park goals,that measure the plan's success in addressing improvements in ecological function of the site,improvements in access to and within the site,and in creating community spaces for gathering and events.Gauging elements of the final concept plan,through performance-based evaluation,provides a measure to determine if goals set during the beginning of the park planning process are being attained." ➢ Asa next step, the Council may wish to request that the Administration work to adapt these goals set in the planning process into a distinct list that can be used to measure progress toward full-build out of the Park and assessing its ongoing performance. I. Park Mission.The mission of Glendale Regional Park,is defined in the Plan as follows: "Glendale Regional Park will be an iconic neighborhood park that celebrates and preserves community,culture,and diversity.It will also be a regional destination connecting to the Jordan River and Salt Lake City's park network.Making nature and recreation within an arm's reach, the park will improve the natural resources and quality of lives for current and future generations of Westside residents." This mission coincides with the Salt Lake City Public Lands Master Plan,adopted by the Council last year, which identified a need for investment in Westside parks,and for enhancing park spaces along the Jordan River. It specifically calls for the Glendale Regional Park to be improved to create a regional attraction and event space that celebrates and preserves community culture and diversity,along with making water recreation accessible to more people.The Glendale neighborhood was identified by the previous Public Lands Needs Assessment as being a high-needs area for park investment whose residents visit parks less frequently than residents of the east side of the city. J. Community Engagement.Community engagement for the master plan process and for the development of the preferred plan began in October 2021. It included youth and stakeholder engagement,development of a Community Advisory Committee(CAC,organized for this project and composed of leaders in the Glendale community to represent a variety of organizations,businesses and affiliations),an online survey and public open house,and in-person engagement events.A detailed description of the public engagement efforts can be found at https://www.slc.gov/parks/parks-division/glendale-waterparkZ. The final preferred plan and final draft plan for the site was reviewed by the Parks,Natural Lands,Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board(PNUT Board),the Community Advisory Committee,and the Glendale Neighborhood Council.The final preferred plan was made available to the public in July 2022,and the draft plan document became available August 25, 2022,initiating the 45 day-public noticing period required for Planning Commission. K. Site Development Phasing.Implementation of the full Glendale Regional Park Plan will be phased to reflect funding and strategic opportunities,as well as staff capacity and logistics.The Department has stated, "detailed design of each phase will refine the design,construction materials,site character,maintenance requirements,and construction costs.Additionally, specific proposed improvements(such as an outdoor pool)will require additional feasibility studies as well as collaboration with community partners and other City departments and divisions." Page ( 9 1. Deadline for Phase i.The Public Lands Department adopted an aggressive planning,design,and construction schedule for this site because it was originally funded by the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund(https://www.nps.gov/subjectsZlwcf/index.htm).This Fund requires that active recreation be publicly accessible on-site within three years of removing existing amenities.This means the first phase of the project must be complete by April 2024. As noted in previous staff reports,to meet this timeline the project team advanced with the detailed design of Phase 1 park elements before the Master Plan has been adopted.This allowed adequate time for the development of construction documents,contracting a construction firm,site preparation,and public notice before construction begins. 2. Phase i Strategy.Elements and amenities were selected for Phase 1 based on the following criteria: e. Inclusion of recreational elements that meet the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund requirements; f. Features that can be constructed within the expedited timeline and fit within current budget allocations; g. Connecting Phase 1 to the existing Glendale Neighborhood Park and its amenities(such as the restroom)to maximize park use and access; h. Inclusion of improvements that will not be affected or closed during construction of future phasing;and i. Community support amenities that are typical of a regional park and are eligible for impact fees. 3. Phase i Elements and Amenities. Elements and amenities typical of a neighborhood park were identified by the project team for funding using$3.2 million dollars of parks-specific impact fees,which were allocated by the Council in FY22.The team will prioritize design and construction of these items,but because of quickly rising costs the Department may need to request additional impact fee funding to complete the list.The list,in priority order,is as follows: a. Playground with accessible design and assistive technologies for all ages b. Pavilion c. Looped pathways d. Community plaza and gathering space e. Landscaping and site restoration(which is scalable,based on budget) f. Multipurpose sport court g. Parking(existing parking is available if this must be removed from Phase 1) Site restoration,including addressing and managing noxious weeds and invasive vegetation,will begin during Phase 1 construction.In addition,the Department will strive to preserve the health of onsite ecological and environmental assets,including existing trees and canopy.The Glendale Regional Park Master Plan will provide additional recommendations for site management and restoration during and after construction. L. Site Background.The Glendale Regional Park site was known previously as Raging Waters, Seven Peaks, and other names over the years.The water park site was closed in 2o18,after the City declined to renew the contract with the most recent vendor.The site has remained closed but was subject to recurrent vandalism and theft of some remaining assets,in spite of fencing and private security contracted by the Department of Public Lands. M. Plan Leadership. Due to the site's size,location along the Jordan River,and complexity,the Department of Public Lands formed an internal City leadership group,which includes representatives of Public Lands, Page 110 Engineering,Public Services,Transportation and Sustainability.The City's consultant on this project, Design Workshop,also collaborates with this group.Design Workshop's team includes specialized subconsultants, including River Restoration for environmental health and restoration recommendations, David Evans and Associates for public engagement, and Agora Partners for programming and partnerships. Design Workshop was also the consultant for Reimagine Nature,the Twenty-Year Public Lands Master Plan. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. Several potential future budget items are mentioned in this update,including one-time costs for construction that are bond-eligible,and ongoing costs for additional staffing and programming that are not bond eligible.Given that not all of these items are not eligible for impactfee funding or the GO bond approved by voters last year,would the Council like to request the Administration provide information about the strategies it is considering to fund these items?(Note: in the FY23 budget the Mayor proposed and the Council agreed to add"Parks Maintenance"to the Funding our Future sales tax funding. $2 million was allocated in FY23 and was deployed in various parks around the City.) 2. The Council may wish to request additional information on the role planned for the Community Advisory Committee once the final version of the Plan is adopted.Does the Administration foresee a continuing role for this group of local community leaders and organizations based in Glendale?Would the Council like to suggest some potential roles to explore? 3. The Plan notes that transit and walking connections are currently inadequate. Given this situation, the Council may wish to are there enough parking spaces to serve users in the shorter term, and how the number of spaces compares to other parks of similar size and function. 4. The Council may wish to ask whether the Administration intends to expand the Park Ranger program to provide coverage to Glendale Regional Park, and whether the recommended seasonal Park "attendants"are intended to take on some of the duties of the Park Rangers. 5. Recommendations on future programming opportunities at Glendale Regional Park would expand the Public Lands Department into some areas of service with which it has relatively little experience. Would the Council like to ask the Administration how it plans to help the Department succeed in this area? Page ( it ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS MAYOR KRISTIN RIKER DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 01/09/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council:01/09/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 4, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Kristin Riker,Director,Department of Public Lands SUBJECT: Adoption of Glendale Regional Park Plan STAFF CONTACTS: Kat Maus Public Lands Planner Katherine.mans(��slc�;ov,cote DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Glendale Regional Park Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Salt Lake City Public Lands Department has been working with a consultant, Design Workshop,to develop a plan to guide development of the 17-acre Glendale Regional Park site, formerly known as Raging Waters. Demolition is substantially complete, and a portion of the park must be open to public recreation by April 2024 to meet the requirements of the Land and Water Conservation Fund (hops./www.nps. �ovl:�ub'ects,bvcflindcx.html). The project team has been working to develop the Glendale Regional Park Plan since Summer of 2021, which will provide the guiding vision and design for the future of the old water park site and establish a framework to guide development and programming of the site into the future. The plan relies heavily on Glendale community input and is aimed at representing the unique and diverse culture of the Glendale Community while also including amenities that will create a regional draw SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION WWkV.SLCGOV.COM 1965 WEST 500 SOUTH TEL:801-972-7800 SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84104 FAX:801-972-7847 PAOL 1 of 2 for residents of Salt Lake City. The project team has worked closely with project stakeholders, neighborhood residents, community partners and students at Glendale Middle and Mountain View Elementary Schools to create goals and objectives for the site, and a community-supported vision that reflects the Glendale neighborhood's rich heritage and identity. Over 1,300 people responded to an online city-wide survey, bringing the total participant count for the project to nearly 1,700. Key elements of the plan were informed by public input and at full build out include: • Community Gathering and Event Spaces—a promenade/community plaza spanning the north central gateway, an event stage and lawn, smaller pavilions and picnic lawns and a riverside beach and boardwalk. • Play Places for Everyone-hiking,walking and paved trails, an all-ages and abilities playground, climbing features, multi-use sport courts, dog park, and sledding hill. • Places to Enjoy the Water—a kayak rental, access to the Jordan River for recreation,boat dock and ramp, and an outdoor pool. • Places to Wheel Around - an ice/roller skating ribbon, skateboarding area, and bike trails. The draft plan also looks at specific metrics,based on the original park goals, that measure the plan's success in addressing improvements in ecological function of the site,improvements in access to and within the site, and in creating community spaces for gathering and events. Gauging elements of the final concept plan, through performance-based evaluation,provides a measure to determine if goals set during the beginning of the park planning process are being attained. The Glendale Regional Park Plan draft provides recommendations for site management and restoration during construction, and after, including programming and partnership needs, operations, maintenance, and staffing are also included in the plan draft document. Programming and management will be key to fulfill the park goal of creating a safe community asset. Potential opportunities for addressing management needs include expanding internal Public Lands staff by recommending additional staff to support and activate the park to enhance safety and enjoyment of the space. The plan recommends a full time, on-site programming manager,two part time, seasonal park attendants and allocating associated budget to ensure programming on the site is robust and effective, consisting of programming funds for arts, culture, fitness, entertainment, markets and community festival events. The plan also emphasizes continuing to create and build upon key community partners and stakeholders, engaging with community organizations that promote inclusivity, equity, and partnerships, and working with local and minority-owned businesses to program elements of the site. More information about programming, operations and management recommendations within the plan can be found on page 71 of the draft Master Plan document. PUBLIC PROCESS: Community engagement for the plan process and for the development of the preferred plan used a multi-pronged approach including youth and stakeholder engagement, development of a community advisory committee, online survey and public open house, along with in-person engagement events. The public process began with robust engagement with the Glendale Community and then broadened to a citywide engagement effort. A detailed description of the public engagement efforts can be found at https:,`wwxv.slc. parks`park s-division/<Gendale-waterpark/. In brief, the engagement process consisted of three engagement windows: Page 2 of 4 Public Engagement Window 1: The first public engagement window prioritized neighborhood and community stakeholder engagement to ensure the community voice was the guide in establishing the initial vision. Considering the predominately younger population in this area,the project team focused on Glendale Middle School and Mountain View Elementary School students and families,while also engaging community leaders and the Glendale Neighborhood Council. The project team met multiple times with the students, engaged in design charettes and used the direction we received from these 130 students to guide initial plan alternative design. The project team also attended and held several in- person events with the Glendale community and created a Community Advisory Committee(CAC) specifically for this plan creation. The CAC was comprised of members who are considered leaders in the Glendale community and represented a variety of community organizations, businesses and affiliations specifically in the Glendale community. The members of the CAC provided key feedback on the project mission, goals, engagement process and vision for the park and shared information about the planning process with their community. The engagement from Window 1 drove the development of two concept alternatives. Public Engagement Window 2: The two concept alternatives were shared with the public and with City Council. The project team kicked-off broad, citywide public engagement with an open house hosted at the Glendale and Parkview Community Learning Center to open a survey. Residents of Glendale, members of the CAC and the city at large attended the event to orient themselves to the plans. Over 1360 people citywide participated in the survey which informed the development of the final preferred plan for the site. The preferred plan includes community-prioritized features from each of the two concept plans. The project team met again with the CAC to review engagement results and get feedback before moving forward with the final preferred plan. Public Engagement Window 3: The third and final window included sharing out of the final preferred plan and final draft plan for the site with the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board(PNUT Board), the CAC and Glendale Neighborhood Council. The final preferred plan was available to the public in July 2022, with the draft plan document becoming available August 25, 2022, initiating the 45 day public noticing period required for Planning Commission. Please see Exhibit B for additional details on engagement events, descriptions, and participation. Additional public comments and responses can be found in the Planning Commission Stal`f Rcport of Novernber 9. 2022. Please see Exhibit D for letters of support from the Parks,Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board and Transportation Advisory Board. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: Following the presentation of the Glendale Regional Park Plan to the Planning Commission, the public hearing was opened where the following comments were made: After discussion of the plan and public comments by the Planning Commission and staff, Planning Commissioner Brenda Scheer moved to recommend approval of the plan with the following statement: "Based on the information presented and discussion,I move that the Commission forward a POSITIVE recommendation to the City Council on the fabulous Glendale Regional Park Master Page 3 of 4 Plan with the PROVISO that the City Council pay special attention to operations, maintenance, security, and staffing for the park as it goes into use."The motion passed unanimously. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) 131C Agenda of November 9, 2022 (Click to Access) b) PC :Minutes of November 9. 2022 (Click to Access) c) Plarinin Commission Staff Report of November 9, 2022 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: A. Salt Lake City Ordinance B. Public Engagement Chronology C. Glendale Regional Park Plan D. Public Comments Received& Letters of Support Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A Salt Lake City Ordinance SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Adopting the Glendale Regional Park Plan to be part of the city's general plan as a specific plan found in the Westside Master Plan) An ordinance adopting the Glendale Regional Park Plan pertaining to property located at 1131 West 1700 South, 1181 West 1700 South, and portions of properties with a certified address of 1375 West 1700 South and 1220 West 2100 South. The Glendale Regional Park Plan will be part of the Westside Master Plan, which is a component of the city's general plan. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission ("Planning Commission")held a public hearing on November 9, 2022 on the proposal prepared by the Salt Lake City Parks and Public Lands Department to adopt a new Glendale Regional Park Plan as part of the city's Westside Master Plan; and WHEREAS, at its November 9, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council") to adopt the Glendale Regional Park Plan, and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE,be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Adopting the Glendale Park Regional Park Plan. The Glendale Regional Park Plan(Exhibit A) shall be and hereby is adopted to be part of the Westside Master Plan, a component of the city's general plan as required by Chapter 10-9a of the Utah Code. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM (SEAL) Salt Lake City Attomey's Office Date: November 21, 2022 Bill No. of 2023. By: Published: P I C.Aelso Senior City Attorney EXHIBIT B Public Engagement Chronology ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor _ x= Project Event Notes Time Period Community and Neighborhood 3,500 Respondents--Public Survey through the department of 2020 Department Survey Community and Neighborhoods to gauge public interest in the future of the park hups:i�vik�v.slc.ttov can care,,�, aterpask; SLC Waterpark Commemoration 3841 Respondents—Public Survey to gauge interest in demolition 2020 Survey Report and re-development of the park. haps: uploads 2021 01 NNater_Park= Surti c Report Nm, 2020.pol' Glendale Community Council I Participants and 3 Community Council Members visioning a 2021 Visioning Exercise potential future for the site Initiation of Formal Planning Public Lands initiates a formal city engagement and planning Spring/ Process by Public Lands department process for the Glendale Regional Park Master Plan supported by Summer Design Workshop as project consultant. 2021 External Stakeholder Engagement: Parents and students were asked at three community events which Fall 2021 Community Events elements from past surveys should be included in the park.Events included:Morning Coffee with 20 respondents;Glendale Scare Fair with around 50 respondents;Hartland 4 Youth and Family Event with 40 respondents External Stakeholder Engagement: Design exercises were led with 88 middle school and 40 fifth grade Fall 2021 Glendale Middle School and students to gather feedback and input on the future design of the Mountain View Elementary site.The process included on-site meetings with 88 Glendale Middle School,"Place-It"activity with University Neighborhood Partners,and collage creation. https:i multicu]tural:utah.*off Glendale vouth-as-placemalccry/ Community Advisory Committee A CAC was created to ensure neighborhood representation in the January 2022 Meeting 1 preferred plan and final master plan documents.These stakeholder meetings ensured engagement with westside communities. The first meeting oriented participants to the project and asked for general impressions on the project. Community Advisory Committee This meeting presented two conceptual ideas for the park and February Engagement Meeting 2 sought specific feedback on the ideas and amenities for the future 2022 site. "Plan Your Park"in-person Open Project team worked with Glendale Community Council to host an March 16, House and engagement event at event with over 100 attendees to share with the community the 2022 Community Learning Center concepts that have been generated so far and to launch a public survey. Online Survey Public survey to gather broader feedback on amenities and concept March 16, alternatives receiving 1361 responses. 2022-April 16,2022 PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT www.slc.gov/parks/ 1965 W 500 S PHONE 801-972-7800 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104 FAX 801-972-7847 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor _ x= Community Advisory Committee This meeting shared the results of the broader survey with the April 12, Engagement Meeting 3 Committee and solicit feedback and impressions on the data. 2022 Community Advisory Committee Final preferred plan sharing and feedback from the CAC,as well as May 31,2022 Engagement Meeting 4 explanation of Phase 1 Presentation to Glendale Sharing of public process and phase I implementation projects, Jun 15,2022 Neighborhood Council timeline,and budget Preferred Plan Confirmation Confirm final preferred plan and share with the public. August- October 2022 Presentation of final plan draft to Share final plan document and phasing plan to PNUT Board and September 1, PNUT Board request endorsement 2022 Presentation of final plan to Glendale Share final plan document,preferred plan and phasing strategy to September Neighborhood Council and public the Glendale Community Council and Public;solicit public 21,2022 comment and question Presentation of final plan to Share final plan document and phasing plan to TAB and request October 1, Transportation Advisory Board endorsement 2022 City Council Plan Briefing and Share final plan document,preferred plan and phasing strategy to October 4, Process Summary City Council as a briefing,and to address comments or questions 2022 Public Hearing and Planning Presentation to Planning Commission for plan recommendation to November 9, Commission Presentation and City Council for formal adoption 2022 Recommendation FUTURE ENGAGEMENT:Master Presentation of preferred plan and Master Plan document to City Projected: Plan presentation and adoption Council for adoption. Late 2022- Early 2023 PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT www.slc.gov/parks/ 1965 W 500 S PHONE 801-972-7800 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104 FAX 801-972-7847 EXHIBIT C Glendale Regional Park Plan MEMMOlendale Regional Park Master Plan ,w .,�' -{ w �<,;.: �' � "# �,` 's�; i..•,,�<{ ,�,c tttKK ��1�{ 14!'� „�� e�''s r���i,�a'Y s°"`a•.; {": '•9,,4'; . � a•,:•#,� a .r �," 1��. f i �� � 3r 4 " �4 r e M1 { A y r a ya. nrtv^ t y f. t . AGORA IVB Public Lands p DESIGM�(}RK�iI-I{)P DASSO IATES Pq RTNE?,$ +%r^"� Paq�uanaa+N iuma+raxty� n..aAS SOCIAT ES'^= �` I I ' Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................VI INTRODUCTION.................................................... I SITE CONTEXT AND ANALYSIS eeee„e„......ee,ee„e„......ee,ee„ COMMUNITY EN A EMENTeeo,eooeooeo..........................25 THEVISI Nee„e„ee,ee,ee,ee„e„ee,ee,ee,ee„......ee,ee„.......39 IMPLEMENTATION,ee„e„ee,ee,ee,ee„............ee„............57 APPENDICES veo,eo,eooeoovooveo,eo,eooeoov........................77 t q _ David Evans&Associates: Agora Partners. River Restoration: b�. r-d q: -`- T E'TOt1f1)G EEN BAY, `I :YO. K rf _ t t„a- L Glendale i I Park Process Overview Project r Salt Lake City Public Lands(SLC Public Lands)has been presented with the opportunity to redevelop the former Raging Waters/Seven Peaks water park site to better serve the community by providing needed park space and amenities.The water park,defunct and in a state of decay,has no prospective operators and it has become unfeasible to revitalize the once-loved space.Public Lands needs to fulfill a directive,established by the requirements of the Land and Water Conservation Fund,to provide publicly accessible outdoor recreation to the community by 2024. The chance to develop the park is significant as the Salt Lake City Public Land's Master Plan identifies a need for investment in Westside parks and enhancing park spaces along the Jordan River.The master plan specifically calls for the Glendale Regional Park to be improved to create a regional attraction with characteristics that celebrate and preserve community culture and diversity and make water recreation accessible to more people. This document,the Glendale Regional Park Master Plan,shares the planning process, research and analysis,community engagement and resulting recommendations to achieve these goals. Site xfi Glendale Regional Park is a part of Salt Lake City's Westside neighborhoods.The park is a major link in a long chain of parks and open space which are all connected by the Jordan River Parkway,which positions the park to become a key recreation destination along the Jordan River Parkway Trail along with the nearby Glendale Golf Course,1700 S Park and Glendale Neighborhood Park.The park location also presents an opportunity to increase access to water recreation and improve essential riparian habitat along the Jordan River. vi I Executive Summary Engagement inclusive play features that all ages and all Implementation SITES pre-score assessment,confirmed abilities can enjoy.Community gathering that the Glendale Park project meets the A top goal for SLC Public Lands was to with opportunities for food and local The park will be constructed in a series of qualifications to pursue SITES certification. create a park that is a community park performances was also important feedback phases.According to the requirements set Details of the SITES prescore can be found first,and a regional destination as well. that was shared. by the Land and Water Conservation Fund, on pages 69-70 and in Appendix A. - •- ° The planning team wanted to be sure they outdoor recreation amenities in the park received robust input on community needs The Vision must be available to the public by spring Park Mission and desires from members of the local of 2024.This expedited schedule requires ° neighborhood and also gather insights on The Glendale Park Master Plan was that Phase I park features are easily Goals park needs from the larger pool of city-wide created through a process of verifying implemented,meet a rapid construction Throughout the process,a Community gi residents.A series of engagement activities park features and design concepts with timeline and fit within the current budget Advisory Committee comprised of local were conducted from October 2021 to May the community.Park ideas were refined allocated for the park.Park features that community members and leaders helped , 2022 including: from initial ideas down to two concept plan are most desired by the community and guide the plan to align with the needs alternatives,which were then refined into a can meet this criteria are being given top ° • Neighborhood and Stakeholder and desires of the Glendale community. _ g Engagement: final park plan. priority for inclusion in Phase I. This committee helped to form a mission Glendale Neighborhood Events:3 The final design strategy seeks to create an Next Steps statement and goals for the park.For full events,110 participants park that celebrates community gathering goal statements,see page 4. gi Youth Engagement:Glendale and active recreation with programs and To meet the rapid timeline required to open Middle School and Mountain View activities that are community-driven.The the park with publicly accessible recreation, Elementary School,128 participants park will be a hub for sharing local food, Phase I design will proceed concurrent Community Advisory Committee to Master Plan adoption.Programming art and culture with family,friends and Meetings:3 meetings including 14 opportunities with community partners will participating members neighbors. continue to be developed to ensure that the "Plan Sharing"Glendale Community The park will also be a place to explore park remains an active space upon opening. Council:15 participants nature through hillside trails,along the to Citywide Engagement: restored riparian landscapes and through The project team will also begin. rehabilitate the site with ripariann and enhanced access to the Jordan River. "Plan Your Park"Open House:100 native vegetation to fulfill the park goals attendees The park design strengthens regional of enhancing environmental quality and Public Online Survey:1361 connectivity,connecting Glendale Park to improving environmental justice for the participants the larger park system with a proposed Glendale neighborhood.To support these Key takeaways from public input included bridge connection to the Jordan River goals,it is recommended that the project the need for a neighborhood park-like Parkway Trail,improved connections to team pursue certification in a sustainability experience with lots of amenities,the need 1700 South Park such as road narrowing program such as SITES or another for increased safety,and opportunities for and an at-grade pedestrian crossing,and a comparable program.This would ensure free and affordable activities.Other themes recommended multi-use trail connection to sustainable practices are adhered to and included the desire to have water play in the future Surplus Canal Trail. would highlight the City's investment in the park in the form of a water feature or restorative landscapes,climate resiliency outdoor pool,a preference for bright and To view the final park plan and park features and equitable environmental investment. colorful park features and a desire for see pages 42-43. During the master planning process,a Executive Summary I vii Introduction Introduction 1 2 _T A New Park for the Glendale Neighborhood Salt Lake City Public Lands has been presented with the opportunity to redevelop the former Raging Waters/Seven Peaks water park site to better serve the community by providing needed park space and amenities.The water park,defunct and in a state of decay, has no prospective operators and it has become unfeasible to revitalize the once-loved space.Public Lands needs to fulfill a directive,established by the site funding requirements of the Land and Water Conservation Fund,to provide publicly accessible outdoor recreation to the community by 2024. The chance to develop the park is significant for several reasons.The Salt Lake City Public Land's Master Plan identifies a need for investment in Westside parks and enhancing park spaces along the Jordan River.The master plan specifically calls for the Glendale Regional Park to be improved to create a regional attraction and event space with characteristics that celebrate and preserve community culture and diversity and make water recreation accessible to more people.The Glendale neighborhood is also identified by the Public Lands Needs Assessment as being a high needs area for park investment with a lower frequency of park visitation than parks on the east side of the city. The park site is also significant as it presents an opportunity to increase access to water recreation and improve essential riparian habitat along the Jordan River,one of the city's greatest natural assets in need of restoration efforts and care.In addition,activating the park will enhance regional connectivity by creating a key recreation destination along the Jordan River Parkway Trail along with the nearby Glendale Golf Course,1700 S Park and Glendale Neighborhood Park. e Goals for the new park include creating a safe,active and communal space that embodies natural elements of the Jordan River and provides new opportunities for recreation, activities and events.This document,the Glendale Regional Park Master Plan shares e ! e ! ! the planning process,research and analysis,community engagement and resulting recommendations to achieve these goals.It outlines the Master Plan for the development ! ! e ! e ! ~ of the former Glendale Water Park;a 17-acre site,to guide capital improvements,site ` programming,and operations and maintenance recommendations. ! 1 I e ! 3 Introduction Park Mission Statement ffiCommunity-Led came to Nature # The vision is community led and reflects The park is a space to build a meaningful backyard will co Glendale's culture and history.The park will relationship with nature.Attractive and E offer space for social connections,features, accessible features and free recreational and services that interest the Westside activities provided in the neighborhood's community. mbat Nature Deficit Disorder in the community. L Community Services j�.` ,bEnvironmental lit Programming 1 � The park builds upon existing natural assets The park provides equitable access to and enhances the ecological health of the ®� t nature and outdoor recreation.The Westside.Features of the park will work to community can enjoy free and affordable improve the Jordan River's water quality # classes,events,and entertainment at the and Salt Lake City's air pollution for the neighborhood's central park. community. ark Activation&Safety Environmental Justice The park is a dynamic destination activated The park celebrates the Jordan River, by daily use.What happens in the park is integral to the community's identity,and an organic expression of Westside culture. enhances local environmental quality.The Local community members,organizations, community-led vision will prioritize the -ry and businesses together will create a safe quality of life for the Glendale neighborhood ® f and welcoming environment. and Westside community. « Regional Connection The park is a regional destination combining and connecting to multiple f m # neighboring parks.As a gathering place along the Jordan River,the park serves as a recreational gateway between Westside :. and the larger park systems. Introduction ( 4 Site Context&Analysis 1 6 Project Context City-Regional Jordan � River Jordan Glendale River Water Park Neighborhood hood Lake SaltLakeal 80 Moos l Glendale Water Park 201 Utah Lake Glendale Water Park 7 1 Site Context&Analysis Project � r iwii , r FOFt R � ,t GR EFARN ,° y e� 'i Watershed and improve water quality in the river.The Fd m ••r`= park is a major link in a long chain of parks R•,; Glendale Regional Park is a centerpiece and open space which are all connected by ' .' along the Jordan River,a culmination of R 1 _ the Jordan River Parkway,This network of seven major tributaries flowing out of public spaces positions the park to become _ k the Wasatch Mountain Range to the east Rxnr�x the centerpiece of an oasis of trees in an La_ FEacEanaoex and the final conduit in the Jordan River and urban environment,absorbing carbon, y II { FARa IL Watershed.The Jordan River is the city's mitigating Salt Lake City's challenging air - largest river and flows south to north, g pollution,and reducing urban heat island for 51 miles beginning at Utah Lake and - effect.When park improvements and draining into the Great Salt Lake.The river's ° features are complete,the park will be a 1 1 , riparian habitat is a rarity in the high desert 1 THREE (•�� major recreational node in the city's park @ExonrTxE 9 CREEKS- _ environment of the Salt Lake valley and R>vER coRR�ucxcE. x: system. supports a variety of wildlife as well as many t• + ' migratory birds along the Pacific Flyway. Neighborhood I N CULTUR City-Regional Glendale Regional Park will immediately ' i .lor an 'AN E� serve the Glendale neighborhood.Park The park is a part of Salt Lake City's enhancements will create direct and Rlv Westside neighborhoods.Despite i''t significant access to the nature that ER b proximity to the natural spaces along the b exists directly in the neighborhood's Jordan River,these neighborhoods are x0 Sir =- backyard,providing opportunities for free sandwiched between the congested I-15 •J 5 �rR®oE i g recreational activities that are nearby °I Vflt �Q r" corridor and the cit 's industrial districts. -_ y and accessible to all.The ark resents r ' According to the 2014 Westside Master an opportunity to strengthen connections " a c <' I' QPark rx _ d Plan,"compared to other communities between the adjacent 1700 South Park to -. within the city(excepting the industrial In the north,Glendale Neighborhood Park R The rv' xm A° i"l districts west of I-215),the Westside carries to the west,and Jordan River Parkway 'C".OLFC oese Future R an inequitable share of land dedicated to to the east.The addition of an enhanced Regional - i manufacturing uses"As measured by crosswalk across 1700 South,bridge Park .e ° ® jY the EPA's environmental justice indexes, connections to the parkway and potential R * `` - s IIIIt the neighborhoods surrounding Glendale x _4 future trail connections to the proposed Prle , Regional Park are disproportionately Surplus Canal Trail will be key to providing ' 21°sowl exposed to environmental hazards such }�. i ' �ti.t it 4enhanced park access for the Glendale _ _ as air pollution that settles in the valley and neighborhood. increases risk of health complications. However,the park's proximity to the I t.Y ` l .. moss -..„ + Jordan River offers an opportunity to build ( � -a 11. upon existing natural assets,creating an r ecological park of vegetation and green infrastructure to mitigate local pollutants Site Context&Analysis 8 Glendale Regional Park m Neighborhood Context .m &it 80RENSONp O C[ttTURA� lown� e a.a „4 „a a a. .� x ��'° orR� ICENTER , tt V-a � a e 1 1 +sS w .a am�g;'e a a° '�a 4 H �. I�E,�CE�TIREE v a a e sr° s mm � m � m•° � i ,,, •y , a B• 1' e°a a°e as .4; �ti'a�a8.a�4ffia. 8 ',.a a aw ., ie a 7 ro �� B d �ffi a ga a s 1700;SR'IVER '{ own � � a t R D � � �� � � � ° a PARK I > '� moml -" romp a a a J , i am n ( � I � The mil :. GOCLLE LFCOURSE Futu 4 Regional . t g Perk B 1. 2100.SOU Pei O , Perl y�o S+DUTFf ook � ~ - -_ , 11r� , 9 Site Context&Analysis .w x � f w � ,1 i I S � , r r. y� Site Context&Analysis 10 Views City Set in Nature ' ,Salt Lake City is known for its spectacular i • mountain setting.Being surrounded by r nature is a point of pride that contributes TO STANSBURY ISL to the City's quality of life. r A hike to the top of the hill built to support the former water park's slides offers views of the surrounding golf course, West Views Northeast Views downtown SLC,the emerald ribbon of . , • , the Jordan River and the Wasatch and Oquirrh Mountains beyond. ^> . .. ° x S E• • , • Southwest Views Southeast Views f m1 11 1 Site Context&Analysis Park Views FARNSWORTH PEAK STANSBURY ISLAND ENSIGN PEAK GRANDVIEW PEAK GRANDEUR PEAK NELSON PEAK KESTLER PEAK DOWNTOWN SEC LOOKOUT PEAK u LOWE PEAK NELSON PEAK GRANDEUR PEAK GOBBLER'S(KNOB O'SULUVAN PEAK FLAT TOP MTN CLIPPER PEAK FARNSWORTH PEAK MT.OLYMPUS LONE PEAK � Site Context&Analysis ( 12 Transportaflon ass Regional Rail&Bus Connections ' There is a lack of regional public transit connectivity between Glendale Park and other parts of the City.The closest rail ¢ a > a connection to Glendale Regional Park is SqE COD y.y the River Trail Station along the Green PARK Line(2340 South 1070 West),which is a 1.3 mile walk away. r; e Nearby bus routes include the 9 and 217 o o AR which run every 15 minutes,and the 509 ro AFfi which runs every 30 minutes.The 513 has w ' limited service and only runs during rush JaRo K hour.Yet,as shown on the following page, these routes do not have stops that are within a comfortable walking distance of c +,pR's Glendale Park. n 1700 U'N Rt ,. .ARK 9 Additional connections to Trax and bus e 1K �� .K lines,as well as other modes of public ARK transportation should be explored in order to enhance park access and sustainable transportation options. Increased public transit connectivity is also an important consideration for RIVER TRAIL facilitating park activities and events. STATION PUBLIC TRANSIT NEAR PARK .i 15 Minute UTA Bus Routes 15 min.service n e 30 Minute UTA Bus Routes 1.3 Mile Walks Park Limited Service UTA Bus Routes a ., _• 5 :ur _.. a_,,,. : . ,R>.r, 15 Minute UTATRAX Line LEGEND Study Area UTA FrontRunner Water Park 0 UTA TRAX Stations UTA Bus Routes Glendale Regional Park UTA TRAX Parks and Natural Lands UTA FrontRunner Stations Public Golf Courses A p 025 05 1 Mies 13 ( Site Context&Analysis dY � Transportation ASS Neighborhood 0 z � Neighborhood Transit cuss There is a gap in public transportation access for both the Glendale neighborhood and Glendale Regional Park. 4 E oJo "_ R 0 ARK 0 ,:. 71 In contrast to most other Westside parks which are within walking distance of public transit,the majority a rn s% of the area is not within a 1/4 mile walk of a bus stop or transit station. � e The nearest bus stops are located 1/3 to 1/2 a mile away soPOP x VF from park entrances.A bus stop along the 509 sits near F 1iA oR° ` the golf course entrance. VAAa � It will be important to support enhanced public transit JoRoAN connectivity between the park and surrounding � RK 'K neighborhoods.While the majority of the population -A commutes by private vehicle,8.5%of households in the Glendale neighborhood and up to 13.2%of households " in the study area do not own a personal vehicle.This is significant,as only 3%of households in Salt Lake City do „ sA= 0-O s SOREN not own a personal vehicle' a MULTI,CWTURAL CENTER rtcrNti E 1 (� * 170Q s RIVER 6 1 United States Census Bureau,2020 American Communitysurvey UTABuSRoUtes {PARK is UTA Bus Stops UTA FrontRunner Route 211 cuss •� - i• 0 UTA FrontRunner Stations i a 15 min.service :1 UTA TRAX 1/3 mile walk 0 UTA TRAX Stations 2 Study Area a Salt Lake City Boundary Quarter Mile Walk from TRAX Stations ` Adjacent. Quarter Mile Walk from Bus Stops Golf Existing Multipurpose Trail Entrance Proposed Multipurpose Trail , 1 Water Park 1 Public Golf Courses y Parks and Natural Lands , Glendale Regional Park 60 0 fi 25 1 Miles r r t = s • • t r � C � _ a' ti Walkabimlity Site Analysis ark • •• qt. { 4 . .. - r 8 r i 2018:12,172 2018:34,566 • 8 � � 2017:12,000 2017:35,000 2014:9,980 2014:27,600 #Source:2022Kalibrate Technologies(Q12022), FSRI Business Analyst LEGEND Water Park 0 5F�,„)Feed 15 ( Site Context&Analysis Trails and Recreation Regional Recreation Connectivity Glendale Regional Park is the southern anchor along the SLC portion of the Jordan River Parkway.Trailhead 511 E MR 0 D access and parking is currently located at the 1700 S PARK id River park. The proposed Surplus Canal Trail will be an important addition,providing a direct connection between the park and residents of western Glendale who currently 'E FOFLA rE0 F do not live within a 10 minute walk from a park. RR ftAN 'A 7 ORENS MULTI CULTURAL CENTER t .EGEND R'V Existing Multipurpose Trail RARE A Proposed Multipurpose Trail On-Road Bike Lanes Water Park co Parks and Natural Lands At Public Golf Courses Glendale Regional Park Trailhead C) Trail Access Study Area E Salt Lake City Boundary o 0 025 05 1 Miles BOATER ACCESS ion Gainsay Trailhead Boot Romp Watervasbased Recreat CATER ACCESS The Jordan River Water :'Fisher Mansion Trail Boat Romp The Jordan River flows from South BOATER ACCESS SHERWOOD •oj Aftheimers Fork,P to North,beginning at Utah Lake and Id PARK north side. emptying into the Great Salt Lake.The boat ramp at Glendale Regional Park is a Id PAK'D Top I] Boat Access Restrooms Parking FID 'REA major access point along the Jordan River 1700 South- 1700 South River Limited at Ramp. Water Trail.This section of river allows Exchange Club Park paddlers access to 3.3 miles of beginner- Marina(Glendale Additional 3 POP A vp level flatwater floating(about 1-2 hours). Parking at 1700 Regional Park) For a quicker trip,boaters can take out South River Park. at the Modesto Park ramp,1.2 miles Modesto Park At Nearby Jordan Limited Parking EPA a- io, downstream.Paddlers who are willing Park 3 %RR t obstacles can continue on for another 3.8 ! 'BOATER o brave a short section of intermediate Alzheimers Park No Limited Parking Fisher Mansion No On-street ACCESS miles of beginner floating until reaching ,M.d.,t.Park, Parking &West side the Riverview takeout at 1800 N. L River access can be enhanced by creating aReti I r easier entry for canoes and kayaks.The AJITI CUMM CENTER 3 water quality is an issue,so swimming should be discouraged,but as the water so GUNDA,k ACCESS-1700 quality may improve in the future,water OOLF Exchange Club K access should not be completely cut off. Tside Additional small boat access locations should be evaluated to create a more local scale river recreation circulation pattern. The Jordan River also has potential for LEGEND urban fishing.According to the Utah Salt Lake City Boundary Department of Natural Resources,the K A, Boat Access river"provides great opportunities for RE Study Area COMMENDED TAKE catfish,bullhead,carp,white bass and OUT-Jordan River walleye.1 However,according to the Parks and Natural Lands Redwood Trailhead report Fishes of the Jordan River,"recent Public Golf Courses Park,west side findings of various pollutants common to Water Park highly urbanized areas like the Salt Lake Glendale Regional Park Valley suggest that it may not be safe to eat any fish from the river,especially in Surplus Canal Dam Hazard downstream areas."' I https://wildlife.utah,gov/news/utah-wildlife- R news/743-4-utah-rivers-that-offer-great- fishingnin-august.mml 2 http://jordanrivercommission.com/wp-content/ 0 025 Ob I ulles uploads/2011/04/Fish-Species-of-the-Jordan- River-2011bdf 17 Site Context&Analysis BOATERACCESS-A, BOATER ACCESS-James James Madison A Madison Park Natural Park,North side River Bank Boat Access Smite Ecology Local an i 1 Migratory BirdsPacific 1 Connections The Glendale Regional Park is in a central %Xe tkeadDuck eu Cremes is o s r part of Salt Lake City but is also centrally located along the riparian corridor "4 of the Jordan River,which provides a key connection of riparian habitats for resident and migratory birds.The site is located along the flyway between Utah "+ Lake and Great Salt Lake and provides 0a potential stopover location for resting migratory birds. I i There is potential for increased areas of higher quality riparian habitat along the Jordan River with the creation of an enhanced multi-canopy layer structure. Robust riparian habitats consist of canopies that could have several layers Existing SiteTrees of complexity including large trees,small trees and shrubs,grasses,and forbs Iry cast [flowers].This multi-layer structure � � 5�an �1� is beneficial for creating a diverse �� �S � ecosystem that will be more resilient to future changes in climate and ecosystem ' . processes.Surrounding regional areas tr that are owned by SLC adjacent to the golf course and in other open areas offer ; great opportunity to be enhanced for riparian functioning and flood capacity. See Appendix B for a full site ecological assessment. Site Context&Analysis ( 18 Climate Considerations Weather Averages Average High=July 90 degrees Average Low=January 26 degrees Salt Lake City is comfortable of the year.... .... %too hot and %too cold. 88 days per year with precipitation 3059 hours of sunshine 8.57 inches precipitation 47 inches annual snowfall' � i Additional Site Considerations North to South moderate winds Overall weather patterns moving in from West to East I Little shade/tree cover Shade/ice in winter due to aspect v " Cooler temps by Jordan River Drought n itl n Glendale Park lies within a high desert environment,receiving only 8.5 inches of water each year.Water is becoming increasingly scarce, f i with Utah's Governor declaring a i State of Emergency due to extreme drought.Recommendations from E Utah's Department of Natural ' Resources to reduce water usage include implementing water-wise f landscaping,a practice that should be applied at Glendale Regional Park to i the greatest extent possible.' 1 https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/salt- Take-city/utah/united-states/usut0226 `' "` 2 https://nhmu.utah.edu/sites/ default/files/attachments/ SaltLakeValleyWeatherPatterns.pdf 3 https://water.utah.gov/water-data/drought/ d rou g ht-dec I aratio n/#:-:text=o n%20 Apri I%2021%2 C%202022%2C%20 Spencer,to%20state%20or%20fed e ral%20 resources. 19 1 Site Context&Analysis Site Impervious Surfaces 111111V a _U I t t x' 1� fit 5 Site Surfaces Asphalt-24% d Concrete:249/6 Pool Features:6% Total Impervious Surfaces:54% 4 _ Pervious Landscape:46% s Water Park Pervious Landsape 333,167 SF Asphalt 176,472 SF Concrete 176,3S0 SF Pool Features 46,053 SF 0 50 100 200 Feet F y�J 4236 �• � � — � � `OSZ� � ., v �2Eo - i 424p A230 • A200'_ '_ 1� �e �� 6£Ztr i Floodplain Site Scale LEGEND 0 50 1uf 200 Feet 2 foot Contours — 2 Water Park 100 year Floodplain Building Footprints *Bulldingson site have been demolished 21 ( Site Contexts,Analysis Floodplain Regional Scale 3=.... Resilient Communities SHERWOOD FEMA Floodmaps highlight areas that are more likely to _ ARx i experience flooding.The 100 year floodplain shows areas s that are likely to flood at least one out of every 100 years ,, (a 1%D or higher chance of flooding)while the 500 year floodplain shows areas likely to flood at least once every 500 years= POPLA" PA RX Floodplain maps help to create resilient communities by ,k highlighting which areas are higher and safer ground _ � � � for structures.Restoration of the floodplain along the Pear Jordan River at Glendale Regional park will remove a few storage and office buildings from the 100 year floodplain, which will mitigate costs that would have been associated s 4 if current structures were damaged.It will also prevent impairments to water quality that would be caused by a fi. SORENSO ,PCU.TUR� 0 compromised structure in the event of a flood.Floodplain CENTER A restoration including planting along the river's edge will P l . also slow stormwater runoff,reducing water pollutants g Y trapped in runoff from flowing into the Jordan River, _ awE ' reducing erosion and improving groundwater retention G NOALs eaR % � , Y 1 on the site. GtENCALE j S$ GOLF COURSE, .Y 4a LEGEND ar RiparianAreas r/.' 100 year Floodplain M 500 year Floodplain 5+ Parks and Natural Lands Public Golf Courses f; Study Area t Salt Lake City Boundary C i, Water Park 1 Glendale Regional Park 0 020 i.5 Miles J Community Demographics Population r t Population and Projected Population Growth Percent 0f Primary Market Under 19`bars Old The planning team analyzed demographics traits of likely park users.This assessment Primary Market Population was broken down into a local assessment,called the primary market area,shown on page Secondary Market/SLC Population 24,and a city-wide assessment,called the secondary market area.See Appendix D for the 222,029 21.77916in SLC full demographic and market study. 204,38Q-�'�� Over the next five years(2021-2026)population in the primary market area is expected to +5.610 2Z85%in County grow by 3.54 percent,reaching a total population of 30,571 in 2026.The population in the 186,399 0 +9.61_30,571 63.48 secondary market area is expected to see slightly higher growth over the next five years, over 19 years old �—36,52% growing by 8.65 percent to reach a total population of 222,029 in 2026. under 19 years old Level of service measures the amount of parkland available to the community and is often measured by park acreage per population.As the population grows,Glendale Regional Park will be an important addition to the City's park system,ensuring that the current 28,369 level of service is maintained and that the community has adequate access to outdoor +4.07% + .54% recreation and open space. Age 2010 2021 2026 The high ratio of children in the primary market area indicates a high concentration of families in the region.The largest age cohort in the secondary market area is between 20 and 29,indicating that there is an overall younger demographic in this region that may Age Group Demographics 0f Primary Market enter family formation years(30-39)within the next decade. 19.78% While park features and activities seek to accommodate all ages,Glendale Regional Park 20 Primary Market Ages will feature a variety of activities that are targeted to families and young people such as an all-ages playground,a swimming pool,a water play feature and a skating ribbon. Secondary Market/SLC Ages ------- ------ Salt Lake County Ages 15 ------ ------- c 0 4, ----- 0 0 10 a ------- 0 0 0 0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 Age Group 23 Site Context&Analysis Community Demographics Household Income and WealthPrimary Market Study Area ES1 health Index Score t105 The 2021 median household income in the primary market area is$50,508,which is less : 100 county -. ®• than that of the secondary market area($63,364)and that of Salt Lake County($80,897). 85 SLC/SecondaryMarket 85 The primary market area is also expected to see less growth in median household income _4'T ` >f 50 (12.18 percent)than in the secondary market area(19.14 percent)and Salt Lake Countywoo y c ° � (13.59 percent)between 2021 and 2026. 25 PrimaryMarket 4��w� The Wealth Index is a metric used to compare overall wealth of communities to the Score of 100-National Average national level.The index compares the wealth calculated for selected areas to the average �' $�,a s #' national wealth levels.Wealth indexes above 100 indicate wealth levels above the national average.The wealth index in the primary market area is 47,indicating that the area has lower amounts of wealth when compared to the national average. ax a Income distributions for both median and disposable income levels are skewed towards ` lower income levels in the primary market area while those in the secondary market , area and Salt Lake County form a more normal distribution around the median income c level.This,in addition to a lower primary market Wealth Index,indicates that income levels are lower in the primary market area than the secondary market area or the county.Given this distinction,the park will best serve the primary market through low or no cost activities for both adults and children.There is a need for the implementation of PrimaryMarkef programming such as free fitness classes or facilities that can supplement recreational Median Household Income of Primary Market demands of the community for little to no cost.If concessions are implemented,then they should be priced appropriately. 20 1= Primary Market Median Income Secondary Market/SLC Median Income ------ Salt Lake County Median Income 15 m : c 0 c� 0 0- 4- 0 m d010 5 - - � � m 0 <15,000 15,000- 25,000- 35,000- 50,000- 75,000- 100,000- 150,000- 200,000+ 24,999 34,999 49,999 74,999 99,999 149,999 199,999 Median Income ($) Community Engagement 1 26 Engagement Overview Atop goal for SLC Public Lands was to create a park that is a community park first,and a regional destination as well.The planning team wanted to be sure they received robust input on community needs and desires from members of the local neighborhood and also gather insights on park needs from the larger pool of city-wide residents.A series of engagement activities were conducted from October 2021 to May 2022 including: » Neighborhood and Stakeholder Engagement: Glendale Neighborhood Events:3 events,110 participants Youth Engagement:Glendale Middle School and Mountain View Elementary School, 128 participants Community Advisory Committee Meetings:3 meetings including 14 participating members — - » Citywide Engagement: "Plan Your Park"Open House:100 attendees Public Online Survey:1361 participants "Plan Sharing"Glendale Community Council:15 participants Engagement for the park site began prior to this project's planning process.Previous public engagement included a City survey and a visioning process led by the Glendale Community Council in 2020-2021,which generated initial ideas about possible amenities and programming options to consider for the site.These ideas were used as a starting point for the engagement activities described in the following pages. Glendale1 r vents The Glendale Regional Park engagement team participated in three community events in early October 2021.The goals for these engagements were to: 1. Share the public feedback being incorporated by the project team to date; r 2. Engage the community in adding ideas for amenities and programming not already shown; t 3. Engage the community in thinking about the site in relation to existing adjacent open space;and } 4. Envision ideas about how existing site features could be repurposed. Participants were invited to share where they go to recreate,in or outside the neighborhood and to consider how the old water park site could interface with the larger open space network around it. 27 Community Engagement I f ling K yTak aways Include lots ofamenities Glendale Across all three engagements,people felt Neighborhood Need for a Neighborhood park-like that adding any public amenity would be experience better than what exists currently.While ° most identified preferences from the Ci toner 2221 Most participants acknowledged that boards,and added a few,most suggested there were not a lot of amenities in the that any or all of the amenities would be a immediate area and that they were benefit. leaving the neighborhood to recreate with Youth families.Some said they use the Jordan River Trail,playground(s)at neighboring Free and affordable schools and the soccer fields at 1700 S Park. Cost is important.Some participants - Predominantly,people use other existing were surprised to learn that there would SEC Parks,including the International be no entrance fee to use the site.Others ' Peace Gardens,Jordan Park and Liberty 1 suggested that boat/equipment rental Park for an outside"park experience."For and acafe/concessions would need to be $ ' Il 11 play amenities like splash pads,playgrounds accessibly priced. and dog parks respondents noted they would drive as far as Kearns,Sandy and 7 Varc 2tiil)2222 Bountiful to use those amenities. Preferred Amenities , The amenities provided on the boards were Safety is a fop priority very popular and are listed in priority order from all three events. Safety was a priority for most of the adults we spoke with.Many mentioned better Splash Pad/Water feature street crossings,lighting at the site and Playground other improvements designed to make Public Art it an attractive place for people to spend Green Open Space/Trail time.This extended to recreation along Sports courts 'an Your r k Open the Jordan River and the cleanliness of the Community Gathering Space water.Many people expressed interest in Skate/Bike park House water activities,but not necessarily from Boat rental the Jordan River in its current state.Even Fishing(pond) people who mentioned fishing thought a Performance Venue March 2022 separate pond would be more desirable than the river. Glendale Commuit Council Community Members at the Plan Your Park Open House(top and bottom) and a Glendale Neighborhod Event(middle). Community Engagement 28 StudentYouth Engagement t Students participated in a variety of engagement activities,including an asset mapping workshops with Saia Langi(City Library)and with Jarred Martinez who runs Truth Cypher, a storytelling/arts collective. Students also furthered their knowledge of city planning ' by participating in Placelt!Activities with Claudia Loayza who is a graduate student at the University of Utah in City&Metropolitan Planning and the Community Engagement ` ¢ Coordinator with the Utah Division of Multicultural Affairs.As part of Placelt!activities, students built environments from found objects that reflect their life-experiences.Students also participated in a soundscape exercise where they listened to park sounds from around j the world.Then,they imagined themselves at the new park and wrote poems on leaves which formed collages,displayed in the image to the left.These activities captured a lot r of the sounds,sights,smells,tastes,feelings,thoughts and community experiences the students would like to have at the new park. As one of the central engagement activities,students put collages together individually using images of parks.The individual collages were deconstructed and categorized into y themes identified by the students.The deconstructed collages were then reorganized into a collective collage.Character images of amenities and features to be used in the park were fit`' Po$ counted and helped to determine the types of amenities to include in the preferred plan. 4 Students gathered data about what values should be most present in the park.As a result, 38%of the students prioritized safety,23%said creating a welcoming feeling at the park a was most important,and 9%felt like fun was their top value.Other top values mentioned include good vibes,home,loving and open.These values were numerically represented in the collage tree with orange leaves representing safety,purple symbolizing welcoming, yellow symbolizing fun,pink being good vibes,green being home and blue being loving and open. K yTakeaways The collective collage represents the importance of inclusion,unity,diversity and creativity when thinking of park design.We hope the design of the park fosters these values.Black Jand white photos mixed with color ask us to consider the importance of history(both of the space and the people with roots in the neighborhood)while looking forward with fresh ideas for the future.Creativity in addressing the desires/needs of a wide variety of ages, abilities,interests,species is also represented by the multi-layered project.Put into the a shape of a tree,the collage asks us to consider the natural assets that are present such as the Jordan River,birds,insects,mammals and existing trees.Nature is emphasized • • • • •• throughout with flowers and stenciled images of butterflies and aquatic animals, f B •` B.`'•8• . highlighting students'desires to have water and pollinator friendly spaces be major parts of the park.The tree design also communicates the desire for staying true to the roots of 29 ( Community Engagement Youth Engagement OQRP R�F�p(URES a our neighborhood while being willing to water-112 images:Students were �� 38% grow into new forms in the future.This strong in their opinion that some water of Students rated also suggests that priority for input for the elements need to be maintained at the safety new design should be given to those who park while also increasing access to water as the have established roots in the neighborhood activities on the Jordan River.They prefer and have helped/are helping to build it. to have a pool and made the argument number 1 value ' e� Stenciled flowers are of a tropical variety, that a pool is much more inclusive and suggesting that honoring the knowledge, accessible to a wider variety of abilities and Need experiences and cultures who come from ages than a splashpad.They contend that lighting and around the globe is important as well.The splashpads will only be used by young kids better street multi-layered approach of the process also while a pool will be used by their younger crossings asks planners to take their time to listen to siblings,themselves,their parents and a variety of voices.The unique handcrafted grandparents.They would like to have at 3D structures underline some of the least a couple slides in the pool. Natu":Plly elements that students find most important to have in the park design.The sculpture of 23�� the pair of glasses requests the audience Nature-74 images:Students would like to observe deeply and take unconventional the landscaping to provide shade,picnic p v said having the perspectives into account with the planning space and natural play areas.They would park fee) '} process. also prefer a pollinator friendly design to welcoming attract butterflies(especially monarchs), we g Students tallied the numbers of collage bees and birds.Spaces for animals was their number 1 images that represent the themes they (domestic and wild)are important to foster. value identified to be included in the park. They also find it important to have trees than { Sports/games-112 images:Emphasis provide food for humans. was on variety in order to offer something of interest to everyone. Students also Adventure-66 images:Student ideas highlighted the desire to have activities for adventure included bike and skate parks, available in each season with perhaps ropes courses,zip lines,and a trampoline a space that could be converted to ice park. skating rink in the winter while functioning as something else in warmer months. Gathering(seating,picnics etc.)-49 Students found it important to have images:Students had a lot of ideas about �� r activities available at all times of day so food trucks being a regular presence at the lighting at night is important to them. Bike park.They mentioned that food will bring park,basketball courts,skate park,petting more people to the park and a food truck zoo and dog park seem to be popular ideas. presence can highlight global foods that are said fu n A running/walking loop around the park is representative of our neighborhood. was their top Sports& also valued. value. Games Community Engagement ( 30 Community Open House Community House The Glendale Regional Park Master Plan Team held an in-person open house at the Glendale Community Learning Center.The purpose of the event was to share park concept plans, which had been created through previous public input.The Glendale community was invited to provide their feedback on different programming elements,amenities and style characteristics while learning more about the project.Concept plans shared at the meeting are shown on pages 37-38. Approximately 150 people participated in the open house,the majority of whom live and/ or work in the Glendale community.Attendees were able to move freely around the event space to talk with their neighbors,the project team,and view concepts plans for the site. Attendees were given stickers as they entered the room which allowed them to identify their preferences on activities,amenities and stylistic themes they would enjoy. KyTakaways The concept plan with the most votes was the"The Glendale Green",a concept alternative that was filled with many park features facilitating active recreation and community gathering.The most popular amenities included a water feature such as a pool,a hiking hill/overlook,river access with a kayak rental and boat launch,biking,skating,and skateboarding areas,and a food truck court. Public OnlineSurvey The public online survey was promoted city-wide and was available from March 16 to April 16.It was offered in both English and Spanish and widely advertised.Approximately 1361 people responded to the survey. Who W Heard Fr m Most survey participants(1,102 out of 1,361 participants,or 81%)live or work near Glendale Regional Park.Responses from the Glendale neighborhood were much higher(30%of participants)than any other neighborhood,indicating that we truly are hearing the voice of the local community.The second-largest group of participants(4%of responses)came from the Northwest Salt Lake/Rose Park neighborhood,a community that was also in the primary market area. The largest percentage of responses were from participants between the ages of 31-40 (28%of participants).This was followed by a large number of responses from youth ages 18 and under(22%of participants).This likely reflects substantial participation Glendale Middle School students,who had participated in previous engagement activities and were encouraged to take the survey.The greatest percentage of feedback came from the white,Latino and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander communities,which aligns with the demographic makeup of the Glendale neighborhood. 31 ( Community Engagement Public Survey Feedback 30% Who We Heard From Of survey respondents live in the 7-How close do you live or work to Glendale Glendale Park? Neigborhood O-A1, 117 84119 rt � (84104) 8412384105 4081 8410284116 8411184104 0000084103 81/0 840958410684115 Of 411 survey respondents t ! � 8410184108 - live 2 -what is your ethnicity? Or work nearby >' . ( 23mwhat is your age? -) Majority of Feedback from white,Hispanic/ _ Latino&Pacific Islander communities _ Lots of Youth Feedback - 30%=18 and younger. Glendale Middle School participation! Community Engagement 32 OnlinePublic Survey Feedback KeyTakaways fit-How satisfied are you with the Overall Support for the Park also less interest in natural water features over bright and active elements,with only draft project mission statement? Overall,there was support for the park 17%choosing water play with sand and Mission statement(68%of participants moveable features,and a natural water were satisfied and 25%were very satisfied). feature being lower on the list of preferred Survey participants were also happy with park elements. rsc the project goals(64%were satisfied and 30%were very satisfied). Adaptive and Inclusive Play Top themes and preferred features from Inclusive Playgrounds accessible to all survey participants reflected the desire for skill levels and abilities were important to a park space that offers a large variety of survey respondents,with an"adaptive and options for active and passive recreation inclusive playground"being the number two and places to host community gathering choice for playgrounds.Playgrounds at the and local events. park should incorporate accessible design with assistive technologies. Enright and Playful While many participants expressed Gathering&Local Events disappointment that the water park could not be revived,there was a desire to include There was a strong desire to create places park features and thematic styles that that would provide opportunities for are reminiscent of the former water park. community gathering,events,and local Bright,colorful and playful park features performances.Amenities such as food 3-How satisfied are you with these were consistently top choices.Water trucks or concessions were also deemed elements such as an outdoor pool and a an important component to draw the draft goals? p community in and activate the park.It was water-play plaza or fountain were deemed _ essential to include in the park design. important to the local community that the scale of events be appropriate for the A"colorful and industrial playground"was neighborhood.Most survey respondents the number two playground choice,behind wanted event sizes to host between 500- the number one choice"play for all ages" 5,000 people and did not want to host (which also has playful imagery)and the larger-scale events such as regional most popular water feature was a colorful, concerts. _ artful fountain.There was less interest in nature play or playgrounds with a natural theme,with less than 12%of respondents choosing either of these features.There is 33 Community Engagement Themes: Online All-ages activities are popular All ages activities were also very popular and were some of the most-selected items. "Play for all ages,including grown-ups"was i the top choice for playground types and "Climbing and bouldering features for all sr r{�T ME C A ages"was the second choice for fitness x. _ features,just behind multi-use sports ` courts,which also serve a variety of age ' 7 groups. i Community Engagement ( 34 High *Top Choice in Roth Public Online Survey and Engagement Events Hiking&Biking Trails* Swimming/Outdoor Pool Food Truck Court Ice IS Roller Skating Ribbon Hiking IS Hilltop Overlook Flex Lawn,Community Event Community Plaza with Concessions* Water Play Feature JS Plaza* Riverside Features Skateboarding Features* &Performance Space 1101 ,Ot a Multi-Use Sports Court* Sledding Hill Community Pavilion* Enhanced Boat Dock/Kayak Rental* Dog Park 35 Community Engagement Park Feature Feedback Top Features Hiking&biking trails with a hill- top overlook,swimming and an outdoor pool were consistently top choices of survey respondents. Skateboarding features,sledding, } riverside features(boardwalk, • Rio enhanced boat dock,kayak rental) and a community plaza with concessions or food trucks were popular as well.Another top feature was a multi-use sports court and a water play feature. r Middle-ground and mixed feedback features Climbing features had mixed Enhanced Boat Dock feedback.Images of children's s g climbing features and interest in Flex Lawn,Community Event& rock climbing were lower on the list Performance Space of selected choices,however the all- Riverside Beach ages bouldering feature received a very high number of selections Kayak Rental Station (728). Dog Park Kid's drawings of desired park features from the Plan Your Park Open House Ice and roller skating features also Playgrounds had mixed feedback.A skating Bouldering Features ribbon was the number two choice out of 10 in Concept A but the seventh choice out of 12 in Concept q a B.Both ice and roller skating were rated in the center of activity d . interests on a scale of one to seven. ,, is 01 aFA Isof Low-Interest Features 60 *sic 0. go, -mlo� _ Least-selected park features ..a'. included a community garden, bird hides,a fitness station ands ' community clubhouse. Community members voted for their preferred park features using stickers and comments at the Plan Your Park Open House Community Engagement 36 The Great Outdoors Park Concept A Nature in your backyard ;Park Features Building on the natural assets 0 Parking Lot of the Jordan River,this option celebrates nature through restoration,education and play community Gardens while bringing the adventure of the great outdoors to the 0 Entry Gateway neighborhood's backyard. +4 m £ _ Nature Play - - 0 Skating Ribbon Walking/Biking Tower&Trails Shade Pergola 0 Picnic&Seating Lawn c Kayak Rental and Boat Launch 0"Meadow"Lawn and Natural Planting r Naturalistic Water Feature Riverside Boardwalk Water Play Feature r Bridge - t ,n r s b �P 4L Q 1 s t.. 37 Chapter Two The Glendale Green Park Concept B 'Concept with the highest amount of popular features in both public online survey and engagement events Community connections �- � � Park Features The hub of the community,this Parkin option creates gathering spaces g to connect with neighbors Food Truck Court and generates vibrant play, exploration and activity for adults and kids alike. Entry/Main Pavilion I t Playgrounds _ '. 0 Adventure Playgrounds 0 Fitness Features ar0 Skating Ribbon t a Climbing Features Picnic Pavilion and Plaza Overlook&Sledding Hill, Hiking&Biking Paths Skate Area Flex Lawn&Small Performance Stage Outdoor Pool �l d ffi g Dock 9 rk';', phi f h Riverside Beach 9 Dog Park .�f d f Bridge GhapterTwo ( 38 T h e Vi'sio n The Vision 40 Design Keeping the memory of the water park alive,the park design is bright,colorful and active.It celebrates community gathering and active recreation with an array of park features that generate vibrant play,exploration and activity for adults and kids alike.Bright playground, plaza spaces and pavilions feature art,lighting and styles both reminiscent of the former water park and reflecting the cultures of the local community. The park is active and community-driven.The many park plazas,picnic areas,pavilions and event lawns offer opportunities for local performances and festivals,family gatherings and community classes.The park is a hub for sharing local food,art and culture with family, friends and neighbors. Glendale Regional Park is first a neighborhood park,creating spaces for community r — .• ': 4 �' gatherings and daily park experiences.A water play feature and outdoor pool create spaces r for splashing,swimming and cooling off in the summer heat.Daily trips to the park can bring a game of basketball,family time at the all-ages and abilities playground,or activities with furry friends at the dog park.The park also offers new regional attractions unique to the Cit s arks stem such as a skating ribbon,kayak rental,riverside beach and an event � Y' p Y 9 Y •Mr e lawn and plaza for local festivals. The park is a place to explore nature through hillside trails and along the restored riparian landscapes of the Jordan River.A circuit of multi-use trails lead to hilltop views of the city or F to shaded riverside seating.A kayak rental station and enhanced access to the Jordan River r creates a gateway to paddling adventures. .w w Restoration and planting improves the local environment,creating an urban oasis that shades the park with newly planted trees,restores riverside habitat,and blankets the park r }E •,:$ '. F, with a garden of native and climate resilient plants. p • The park design strengthens regional connectivity,connecting Glendale Park to the larger park system with a proposed bridge connection to the Jordan River Parkway Trail,a P recommended pedestrian crossing to 1700 South Park and a recommended multi-use trail `. •., 4.=z connection to the future Surplus Canal Trail. ire m r 41 The Vision Glendale Regional Park Master Plan q t !, t Park Features rail connection r t t Picnic Lawn AIIAges&Abilities Playground P y' 0 Pavilion/Shade Structure _ 0 Full-Court Basketball Ice&Roller Skating Ribbon to � • 0 Kid's Climbing Feature 0 All Ages Climbing Feature _ Pavilion Community Plaza/Promendade Parking Lot v P •�• rR� Hiking&Sledding Hill ADA Accessible,Multi-Use Trail Hilltop Overlook Skateboarding Area • Water Feature/Plaza Outdoor Pool 0 Flex Lawn&Performance Space Flex Stage/Plaza Bridge Connection to Jordan River . � • Parkway Dog Park #{ m Picnic Areas Riparian Restoration Riverside R' 'd Boardwalk a Riverside Beach&Sand Volleyball r Kayak Rental Station �# Boat Dock " + �, ' • Boat Ramp tom# m k. 1 Boat Drop-off �r 0 Pickleball Courts TheVision 42 a f �°F x* 7F + Park Features ® �im. oil b � 7 1}. dt t f wC :: 43 The Vision Glendale Regional Park Vision-Playground for All Ages&Abilities • , 'r� - Programming&Activation: a Creating Memorable Community Experiences " Programming and activation at Glendale Regional Parkwill seek to capitalize not t _ � � • only on the scale and amenity mix in the d new park,but most importantly on the 8 s: kg%• surrounding neighborhood's character W t$ �s g' and in-place assets.Glendale is a culturally 201 "rt rich neighborhood with a variety of stories to tell and experiences to share with each { other and with Salt Lake City as a whole. While the park's design and landscape will define the"look,"outdoor programming will define how it feels.Public programming will differentiate it from parks throughout q Salt Lake City by providing an environment where residents and visitors want to spend time,and will use amenities and activities �� s to create memorable experiences and , � _a• , emotional connections to Glendale. • d Today,Salt Lake City residents and visitors don't necessarily expect robust programming of public spaces.Many parks and plazas have failed to maintain a positive visitor experience because they have not programmed and managed their public realm to exceed local precedents. Visitors to Glendale Regional Park will have expectations for a safe and clean place that provides some sort of basic amenities.Our aim should be to exceed those expectations and surprise them with offerings they can't find anywhere else in Salt Lake City.There is an innate human desire for a feeling of community,and programming should provide some of this,especially in a rich and diverse multicultural environment like Glendale. The Vision 44 Phase I Programming Opportunities Children/family *See Phasing Strategies Pg x for full Phase 1 description, elm Family fitness activities All-ability movement The diagram highlights possibilities for park programming,activities and events. Music/literary education Community partnerships along with City programming will be essential to Organized play activities activating the park. Animal education events River Programming Safety and awareness a, Skillsworkshops Habitat education ~' — ffiwe ° volunteer events Outdoor/environmental Nature/meditative walks y 4 Birding/wildlife workshops A b - Gardenshorticulture • - Public art Arts/culture j community Audiencearea r ' Outdoormovies a J n Fmed t c Lawn games Restoration Area - k` a — Sports courts Clinics/lessons a ,Restbratmn Qe x. r All-ability skills training Arts/culture/community Art cart f r` Arts and crafts Small music/performance a Literaryevents Lectures - -` �N Board games Fitness/recreation/events Low impact fitness P 11� r Organized recreation/workshops * % t Community cultural events Outdoor hobbyist activities 45 The Vision Future Phasing Opportunities for Programming Arts/culture/community The diagram highlights possibilities for park programming, Expanded arts programming activities and events.Community partnerships along with City Artist talks and performance programming will be essential to activating the park. Artists in residence Concession Aquatic Programming Swim lessons Safety/CPR Parent/child program Senior fitness classes = Skate park t Lessons Demonstration • Skateboard repair y r# - M1pM �� � ,• ^f $ Deck art workshops a - r River Ri Programming �,.. � �;�� 9 �: �'g_� tr � �. b•� v , p;p Boating recreation (i sue-,' . L $• r �' ,' .-"' X ' " � �' r r Boatskills fi , Bait and tackle 01 a 4 k pv ,• " Concession River recreation Swim lessons/safety `� h.At tty JF �. Tubing Restoration/cleanup ' ?6 GigRiver education events qtDog Park x � ' 6. 'AW a . Owner socials . AP, Training workshops . Mobilegrooming Programming Will: a Bark bar concession » Define how the park feels Differentiate it from other parks and destinations-"the Performance/events competition" Concerts Provide and active and appealing neighborhood anchor Theater and dance �> Provide a safe and clean place Community festivals Capitalize on Glendale's rich and diverse multicultural Workshops(stage) environment Capitalize on Salt Lake City's outdoors orientation Fitness(Stage) The Vision 46 Programming/Activation Park Activationr All Seasons and Times of Day Park Programming Calendar of Events Matrix Example Programming,such as depicted in the hypothetical matrices,is broadly categorized as: , r Arts&Culture,Fitness,Hobbies&Niche Interests,and Live Entertainment.Each category provides a range of options that vary by time of day,seasons,intensity of activity,and,of Art supplies/art cart x x x x Both All Daily course,demographic cohort.We consider programming categories across the zones of Dance lessons X X Night Peak Weekly Glendale Regional Park,establishing a coherent pedestrian experience as one moves from Figure drawing classes x x Night Peak Weekly one area to another,while creating distinct environments throughout the park,coordinated Folk art/crafts x x x Day off-Peak Weekly with the landscape architecture.The over arching goal is for Glendale Regional Park to feel Instrument petting zoo x x x Day Weekend Monthly busy and active and to give all user groups a multitude of reasons to visit at different times Local author readings X Day Peak Weekly through the year,a season,and even their day.While Glendale Regional Park can't be all Toddler art program x x x Day Off-Peak Monthly things to all people,it can certainly provide a range of experiences. e Market Potential Study:Visitation Potential Board games cart X X X Daily Bookclub X X Monthly Bird-watching club X X X X Weekly Kayak/river education X X X Monthly activities Cooking classes X X Monthly Salsa dancing X X Weekly Makers workshops X X X Monthly Weekday Visitation Potential Lunch Hour Biking club X X X Weekly 77 People Capoeira X Weekly Familyyoga X X X Weekly Mid-Morning Mid-Afternoon Walking club X X X X Weekly Lower Use Lower Use Hula hoop X Weekly Momilig Alfemoon Kickboxing X Weekly Zumba X Weekly Young adults without Youngfamilieswith kids small children Seniorsandolder Preteens and teens Acappella X X X Weekly adults without kids Brass bands X X Monthly Before Work After Work Dance performance X X X Monthly 138People 138People Emerging musician series X X Weekly Evett�tg Outdoor movies X Weekly Young adults without Theater X X Monthly kids Silentdisco X X Monthly The diagrams above display estimated park visitation collected from the planning team's market analysis. 47 The Vision RegionalGlendale iiHillside Sledding Mountaini a * i 11 ��• a t.. �7 "� t " t �"�{�� � �"� \� � a � A��, ��' � r" �� .4l'ia'�,�� aye t'S_• '" ii[�I�Ii�t�illi��';1$C� q���a'�''•.lit' b°'T.�IF dr:�°f�i�liF-`°�i�;• r z d � a • R S , _ p .a, � .� � `t �r •a � 4i '�� 'z`' �� _ ,tom ,' sf d = , Y-fit • ,» ti ,9 �'•,�, *r as_ �: k4..y „�• {, ..,.. 'Y, r ` ¢ •� �' ���:�}`� •±a;�?b �. o"� � " Pa.�:fa xl''{ IL }�,,... t ,q.:,.. *�l•. t ti ,s�'t 5 •; -Ir }tV -�'",l ?S•: sa 'S ' t� ,x •�0 ,fit' t �°' s+ �F 'za:"� ..t •k. ie• a4u h.. i p ¢',r 5 ¢ y `:r'* e dt Y e rg, g t4• 1. "{ i _o y ,�.�"fit��e, «°� •,�' � �L �. � 4 b i t t i •tr TheViSion 48 Partnerships/Activation Partnerships:Diversity,Equity and Inclusion Opportunities Glendale Regional Park is poised to become the Westside's"central park,"with the goal of building a loyal base of regular visitors from all corners of the city.While Glendale Regional Park will be a public park that gets used by nearby residents for everyday recreation,it will Market&Festival j also become a citywide amenity and driver of tourism and economic development. ® 10 x 10 Market Tent FThedl gram below shows a possible layout for The efforts to create a new Glendale Regional Park coincides with a national trend market and event teats a�er� �le community plaza. 20x20MarketTent where downtowns and neighborhoods are seen as competing over a scarce pool of - resources after the economic benefits from downtown development did not reach those Space for food tracks is stationed along the plaza Food Truck Court neighborhoods in many cities;whereas the political consensus in the 1990s and 2000s was edgethat strong downtowns helped create strong neighborhoods,today it is far more common ' to hear elected officials emphasize their commitment to neighborhood-based community development and lament that too many public resources have been spent in central business districts. Given the sensitivities of the neighborhood relative to gentrification and public resources, the discussion around park equity must be reframed.The planning team has identified gi three planks of an overall program for Glendale Regional Park to help the City promote equity and ensure the new park is inclusive of all residents:growing minority-owned f" businesses through concessions and contracts,supporting existing organizations that promote inclusivity and equity through programming partnerships,and partnering with local organizations through internships andjob training. Growing Minority-Owned Businesses Food&BeverageEntrepreneurship �. Proposed future food and beverage opportunities are an opportunity to support budding entrepreneurs with limited access to capital.An entire program can be formulated with movable structures that come equipped with sinks,small refrigerators,and countertops, ye p so concessionaires only need to purchase electrical appliances,signage,and whatever supplemental FF&E they desire(subject to City approval).This would make the concessions x r affordable opportunities for new food businesses.A park-or City-focused director of hospitality,or community partner organization,would be qualified to guide these concessionaires with respect to menu design,kitchen operations,merchandising,signage, w v and the other aspects of running a successful food business that are usually learned through a lot of experience.The City should provide,or work with a community partner to provide,this service/consulting for free. Glendale Regional Park(via the City)would need to establish an application process that would identify the entrepreneurs who would be likely to succeed in the park based on their proposals.Applicants would need to be new business owners.The applicant pool could also r include women-owned and immigrant-owned businesses. 49 ( The Vision v , v w•.. w' n 1 kw I. w w , 4 � _ i - d , Lim v The commumt vibrant pr"omeade and festivals as W611'as food trucks, ,a, market booths and community-led activities. [� Concession Contracting programming at Glendale Regional Park to take on new full-time staff to help grow Occupational Training and that can eventually be sponsored.To their businesses or service offerings. Employment A mobile concession program(which is launch these programs,the park will need different than the food program above) to partner with cultural institutions,small The City can identify which organizations Glendale Regional Park can also work should also be addressed.While such program are positioned to take advantage of the with a workforce development businesses,and nonprofit service providers. p p 9 a program would not involve the City The most desirable and reliable partners for possible benefits of a programming to provide work experience for program offering any financial assistance to these Glendale Regional Park will be established partnership.Many partners will enter into participants and employment for graduates concessionaires,the scoring system in an organizations with existing constituencies. a discussion at Glendale Regional Park of their program.For out-of-school youth, application or request for proposal(RFP) The loyal followers of these businesses and already cognizant of how the partnership Glendale can offer occupational training process could take into account whether nonprofits will show up to activities they 9 fits into their strategic plans,and this in rounds maintenance and skilled a business is minority-or woman-owned. produce in the park,diminishing the need should be part of the criteria used when landscaping and gardening.This could Recommendations include adding this to promote them and helping to seed a base selecting partners. create mutually beneficial opportunities for component to scoring proposals as part of level of activity. Glendale,the City,and citywide residents, a larger change that would seek to qualify Workforce Development providing Glendale Regional Park with extra concessionaires prior to their launch in the The City can specifically target help at a reduced cost and creating a new park and institute minimum standards for organizations who primarily work The third part of a strategy for Glendale Regional Park to succeed in community source of education and job opportunities operation. with constituencies that are usually for emerging gardeners. underrepresented at parks,specifically engagement goals of partnering with the in Glendale.A successful strategy will City to combat park inequity and advance Whether or not occupational training is a Programming Vendor Contracting park inclusivity,is to partner explicitly with possibility, y pathways build these relationships systematically p y,the City can create athwa s to There are a variety of types of programming and incrementally;it's important to be a workforce development program and employment for workforce development partnerships,but the most straightforward realistic about how many of and how often leverage the program as a resource for program graduates,such as prioritizing partnership involves the City hiring an their audience will travel to the park,and Glendale. graduates in the hiring process.An individual or business to perform a service for partnerships to develop organically.A exclusive hiring window should be created (as opposed to a partner providing in-kind programming partnership might start with Paid internships for prospective employees referred by services or the City and the partner having one or a few events each year,and grow a workforce development partner with a cost-sharing relationship).Common through successful participation. Glendale Regional Park can offer paid a commitment on the City's part to hire examples are fitness classes,art classes, internships for in-school youth in a variety qualified applicants from the pool of of areas.Programming and marketing graduates.Prioritized job opportunities and the vendors who provide equipment or Building Capacity in Partner g pp furnishings for larger events. are two likely sectors where there will be could include positions in sanitation, Organizations a need for interns and reciprocal interest maintenance,landscaping,hospitality,and Similar to the mobile concessions RFP on the part of students.Work in these two customer service.Graduates of workforce process,the Citycan make an explicit Programming partnerships can also areas can often be broken into discrete, p benefit third-party organizations by development programs typically perform commitment to prioritizing people of color seasonal efforts(i.e.,helping to launch better and are retained by employers at when it hires artists to teach a watercolor helping them better fulfill their missions or managerams specific programs,creating(in the case of nonprofits),exposing them p p g g a higher rate than people recruited from class,fitness instructors to lead classes and to new audiences,and building their content for specific social media campaigns publicjob postings. other vendors. in-house capacity.By working with the or events,etc.).In addition,internships City at Glendale Regional Park,nonprofit could focus on special projects such as Programming Partnerships y g p organizations may be more likely to building an historic photo archive of Raging Targeting Underrepresented secure grants or be able to pursue grant Waters that could get incorporated into a opportunities that they may not have future augmented reality component of a Audiences otherwise been eligible for.Cost-sharing mobile app,targeted donor/grant research, In addition to establishing and expanding arrangements make it affordable for some or administering and helping to analyze a fee-based programming,the City survey of park visitors. should create a wide variety of new free 51 ( The Vision THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK The Vision 52 Measuring r r s Gauging elements of the final concept plan through performance-based evaluation provides a measure to determine if goals set during the beginning of the park planning process are being attained.The following metrics evaluate the park design according to original park goals. e oga9 A499ak48 low gaaagqqqxliaaalx n aaa AM— To f. Y ,� qqa qxq Axgi4g6gx qg eggs r 9 u •Y� .. E ir, 53 The Vision Trails ti i g . I 'A 4 Public Lands spaces connected after all associated trail and crossing recommendations are . b _ x« implemented. a New Connections:A new crossing linking to 1700 Seth Park and a bridge linking to the Jordan River r.p. t Parkway will connect with the future - Surplus Canal Trail and a proposed multi-use path along 170 South t g_ f create a Glendale Trail Triangle. :•G �F Trails 1700 street access Jordan river parkway trail mi i i Glendale Park trails Hiking Trail New Connections The Vision 54 Community Spaces- Plan Metrics 1,713 Community members involved in the planning process, � aair Al .�. �. s Activities amenities , v r& k added to the site. 1 of Individual elements in the _k park are AA accessible gi g new and unique recreation opportunities introduced to the citywide Public Lands'systema Community Spaces Active Play-High Programming Community Gathering-High Programming 55 The Vision Environmental®Plan Metrics • e, - ° • - r r t } Acres of natural areas added Y ! that provide public access • r r Y • v ,: qy w_ IJ Acres riparian habitat restored t Impervious surfaces reduced by %,improving water quality and v replenishing groundwater* • t � 10.9 Acres of native&waterwise a + planting reduces water use Soft&Hardscape EM Native/Water Wise Planting& *See page 20 for previous site surface Turf calculations EM Riparian **Hardscape includes some Native Grass&Shrubland impervious crushed granite pathways Hardscape** milli The Vision 1 56 Implementation 1 58 Implementation The park will be implemented in a series of phases.Many factors are contributing to the decision-making process examining which elements will be included in phase one of park implementation.Most notably,according to the requirements set by the Land and Water Conservation Fund,outdoor recreation amenities in the park must be available to the public by spring of 2024.This expedited schedule requires consideration for park features that are easily implementable,can meet a rapid construction timeline and that fit within the current budget allocated for the park. Other phase one considerations include the need to group park features and improvements into a consolidated area,creating a fully functioning park with a variety of activities and amenities prior to the completion of future phases.Consolidating developed areas of the park allows the remaining undeveloped areas to be strategically fenced,limiting access to hazards left from previous water park infrastructure.The fencing plan also facilitates phasing strategies for vegetative restoration,weed abatement and site preparation for future phases while mitigating exposure to visually unattractive,undeveloped areas. Public input is another consideration shaping phase one features.Some of the top park features that are desired by the neighborhood,such as an outdoor pool,cannot be accommodated in the first phase due to cost,a lengthier construction time frame,and the p time required to work through possible partnership logistics. However,park features that are most desired by the community and can meet the criteria mentioned above are being given top priority for inclusion in phase one.This includes a + multi-uses sports court and an all-ages and abilities playground.Other desired features will p 9 p Yg be filled by interim elements,such as food trucks being stationed in the parking lot before a formal community plaza is fully built out,access to hiking on the hill before formal trails A. are installed,and a kayak rental locker included next to the existing boat ramp prior to full enhancements being completed along the Jordan River. • Future phases of the park will be implemented as quickly as funding and logistics can be navigated.Grant,donation and partnership opportunities which align with park goals and proposed features and programming will be expeditiously explored to realize the full site design and potential for a regional-quality park in the Westside. 59 ( Implementation Phasming Maigram Segmented Phasing 11 The diagram highlights phase one elements, which will be completed by spring of 2024.All other portions of the park will be completed in future phases. Anticipated future phase elements are segmented into parkfeature zones for flexible implementation.These smaller zones may be implemented simultaneously } g or phased incrementally as park funding y_.m u ;� .• �7� and partnerships become feasible. _ + Outdoor Swimming The diagram suggests a possible phasing Pool! sequenceto prioritize park features that a Ramp, Parkingt&Y - M Bo Dock, are popular with the community while also omm t Dro off,' utilizing' �Phase'1 .' - _ p- g park space to the greatest possible a' Plaza } f x Stafionl extent.This phasing order should be flexible Qr,> Watereatur`b` _ in response to partnership and funding '� n Plaza;Flex opportunities as well as available funding P Performance v f p' and the cost to develop each phasing zone. _ Space fps I 4,a ,0 >' A t Ae i s Hill with Overlook& Skateboarding :.. Skatin �. Trails/Dog Area ; g Par fiieae4-4 rsi • - l ` Ribbon�r +� � Pavilion _a �, m` f 'Board Je _ 21 r ` I Implementation 60 Phase I Park Features Park Amenities iAccessible Areas r _ 1 Phase 1 Elements Trail Connection g Picnic Lawn , All Ages&Abilities Playground 4' _ 0 Pavilion/Shade Structure 0 Full-Court Basketball " p Community Plaza I v� Parking Lot ®' 0 Parking/Interim Food Truck Area ® Undeveloped Hill with: a o�. Native Landscape Restoration Informal Hiking Opportunities ff: Possible Art Installations Existing Parking Lot Kayak Rental Locker Existing Boat Ramp d ' d , , t f 61 1 Implementation Phase I Programming Opportunities Children/family Family fitness activities Y ' All-ability movement Music/literary education Organized play activities Animal education events River Programming Safety and awareness a, Skillsworkshops Y4 Habitat education volunteer events Outdoor/environmental ot,14s Nature/meditative walks 4 Birding/wildlife workshops Gardenshorticulture t } Public art Arts/culture/community Audiencearea Outdoormovies s is�,. .. °�.�d•;�9 �;�`,,, � „;`~ �. f, tAw. ` J n Fmed (}' Lawngames r Restoration Area Sports courts a i Clinics/lessons -. Feney+d ' _ Rstbratmn A e a , All-ability skills training Arts/culture/community Art cart r` Arts and crafts Small music/performance Literaryevents Lectures Board games Fitness/recreation/events Low impact fitness r Organized recreation/workshops Community cultural events Outdoor hobbyist activities Implementation 1 62 Opinion of Probable Cost Phase I Phase 7 Costs The project team developed phase one to propose a set of amenities that could be implemented,pending contractor bids,with current funding.These elements include an I ambitious set of improvements that can be accomplished for 3.5 to 5.5 million dollars. Phase one was designed to maximize usable park features and efficiently utilize funding as it comprises only approximately g 10%of the total park cost yet completes 30%of the full park buildout. Further design and cost estimating is ;o needed to understand the true costs of 1 the proposed amenities.This proposal is g, based on current construction costs and contracting pricing is likely to be much higher two years from now. = r Phasing sts As detailed design is completed for each phase,a true understanding of cost will be established.Some park elements have Full Park Build Out B t much higher costs associated with them such as the pool and the skating ribbon and will vary in range of cost depending on the length of time it takes to implement them. y , « See the phasing diagram on page 60 for the r recommended phasing approach. „ Ea 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F11 Park Build !. Full build out of all park elements could range in cost from 30 to 50 million dollars depending on how long it takes to fully I implement all park features.The sooner the site is redeveloped and the fewer the phases of development,the more cost efficient it is to construct the park. -t ; _ err.~�• 63 ( Implementation V, -144, Phase I Restoration Strategy Recommend ions t e �' Phase one ecological improvements include riparian and planting enhancement g. _ _ along the riverside.With exception of consideration for future riverside improvements such as a new boat ramp ' and boardwalk,these areas will remain p largely undeveloped and initial efforts toward a permanent,long-term restoration plan should take place.Public Lands will prioritize restoration efforts based on recommendations to the greatest extent possible,but will also evaluate capacity, management and staffing considerations . for prioritization of areas. In the western,developed portions of the ( h park,ornamental plants will be included as part of the park design.The planting selection should consist of native,water- wise and climate adaptive plants that will t � �' r utilize less water,tolerate heat in a changing climate and provide ecological benefits for • �- birds and pollinators.�W The remaining portions of the site will be prepared for future phases with � r transitional restoration efforts.These areas will be seeded with native grasses and wildflowers as an intermediate restoration step,providing a solution for weed mitigation,soil retention,and providing ecological benefits until further ° site development and restoration efforts are completed.•e ri. See the full restoration strategy m on the following pages for further _ recommendations on preserving tree canopy. Implementation 64 Ecological i The planning team's ecological expert,River Restoration,conducted a site visit of the Glendale Regional Park on August 23,2021,to evaluate the current ecological conditions of tr the project area and to determine what features should be retained for ecological reasons. .fi This assessment,included in Appendix B,resulted in the identification of trees and habitats that should be retained as possible.Areas for potential enhancement were also identified and include all existing riparian forest and a buffer of 50-300'from the river.See the restoration diagrams on the following page for recommended restoration areas. Riparian Restoration and Tree Canopy The current state of the riparian forest in and around the project area is in a degraded condition.Some of the existing large trees within the project area have a high value,since they are well established and seem to be healthy.The sycamore trees are of high value and should be considered to protect in place,since they are mature,well-established,and healthy.The existing trees along the park strip at the north of the project area should also be preserved to maintain this important buffer from 1700 South.The remaining groves of trees can be evaluated on a case-by-case basis for phased removal or replacement with planted and irrigated multi-layer riparian areas.The diagram on the next page shows areas p 9 Y p g p 9 1• �}�! of existing riparian trees that could be retained. Habitat improvements are a key goal of the Project and phasing the project's construction will reduce potential impacts to the site's current wildlife population by limiting the amount of area that will be disturbed at any one time while leaving undisturbed portions to provide habitat.This applies particularly to habitat for migratory song birds.Partners working e1 along the Jordan River Corridor have recommended a phased approach for removal of Russian olives,which serve as habitat for migratory and resident bird species.Russian olive ' should be left on portions of the site that are not part of the initial phases and riparian plants should be planted into Russian olive stands,where the shade from the existing invasive trees will help with establishment of new forests.Areas where Russian olive was removed should be the top priority for restoration of riparian forests to return the multi-layer canopy for nesting and migratory birds. e e eke a Site Restoration Treatments e e e e See the Phase I Restoration Diagram on page 64 for restoration treatment priority areas. Full recommendations can be found in Appendix C,Restoration Plan. e e • Treatments proposed for summer and fall of 2022 include: e e m Aggressive chemical control of noxious weeds to follow up on areas treated in 2021. Aggressive chemical treatment of hoary cress and phragmites in areas along the e e e e e riverbanks where Russian olive was cut down. Chemical control of noxious weeds in all disturbance areas. e e Seeding of all disturbed areas with an inexpensive grass/forb mix. 65 ( Implementation Smite Restoration Strategy Site Preparation . 0 t r rI I ", y --�- t ® �.4 Rip Aggressive chemical control of noxious n p ` x r� ® d weeds adjacent to all disturbance areas p�. . is> jV� should be a high priority.These are theAir most likely places for spread of noxious and invasive plants.These areas should ' also be seeded soon after the disturbance ceases(generally within 2 weeks anytime of the year)with an inexpensive grass and forb mix.This should be done any time disturbances occur throughout the project 'r lifecycle to reduce the opportunity for -- noxious plants to dominate.This is cheap : insurance and will reduce the potential - need for chemicals to be used on the site in the future. 12"of topsoil for the disturbed area will Ii I be needed for grasses to establish while f "planting pockets"that have soil depths up to " 36"will be needed to allow small trees and r ' shrubs to be established.It would be good to add terraces on the hill with up to 3'of topsoil,allowing for larger shrubs and trees to establish. Ecological Stewardship .' ^+.,•.s., 4•, to The local and regional context was evaluated to discover opportunities for ` gi ecological enhancement and stewardship. Students from Glendale Middle School have a previously provided stewardship for areas m�•t a ". } 4 F just downstream of the project and Jordan g - " River Park.The future stewardship of the `_ •ar +� natural areas in the vicinity of the project should involve local schools and community partners. 1 ,d There are also opportunities fora broader connection to the river both up and downstream.Development of on- �" s ,�4-r ,6 water recreation opportunities is one ~ of the highest values of the site from a stewardship perspective. Implementation ( 66 Planting Palette drLj$ Oithii ala i Water-Wise Planting [The planting palettef,��a _ i rsi lets sows examples of � ,� �;1 �, possible plants for q 1 � Saltgrass,Inland Glendale Park.The plant Distichlisspicata selection should include Western wheatgrass native,Water-wise and Pascopyrumsmithii climate adaptive species Sand Dropseed Westernheat rasa InlandSalt rss which use less water Fesc FesLuca uca ovina and provide habitat for pollinators and wildlife. A��s�a#a ���lata Freemont Cottonwood � ��� lip'w Populus fremontii Apache Plume Hillside/MeadowPlants Fallugia paradoxa Sand Dropseed Rosa woodsii Sporobolus cryptandrus Skunkbush sumac Rhus trilobata Blanket Flower Wood's rose Gaillardia Aristata Lewis Blue Flax j" Li is le Fla Blanket Flower c Mountain Golden currant r mont Bee It Ribes aureum Cottonwood Western Wheatgrass rush Pascopyrumsmithii SP �. ccittea Green Crysoham thamrabbitbnu sviscidiflorus O a � �� Rocky Mountain Bee Plants +� Marsh milkweed Cleomeserrulata �? F 1 Asclepsia incarnata Bluegrass,Sandberg Poa Sandbergii Solidago canadensis Canada goldenrod Scarlet Globemallow Sphaeraicea coccinea Wooly sedge Carex pellita Alkali sacaton Sporobolusairoides Lewis BlueI Scarlet Globemallow ApachePlume 67 ( Implementation Climate fi Trees Nativeof r® i t ;. Japanese Tree Lilac rya al IafS Syringa reticulata Ivory Tower Yucca Shademaster Honeylocust Yucca flacida'Ivory Tower' '' Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'o-^ Japanese Tree Desert Four O'Clock Desert Four Shenandoah Switch Gambel Oak Mirabilis multiflora Quercusgambelii Lilac ®Clock Grass Fire Chalice Catalpa , ttthos i... Zauschneria(Epilobium)californica �1et 5��q �tS'S Catalpa speciosa �s 0 Palmer's Penstemon Fairmount Ginkgo Penstemon palmeri Ginkgo biloba'Fairmount' Prairie Winecups Golden Candle Rain Tree Callirhoe involucrata Koelreuteria paniculata 'Golden Candle' Coneflower Bristlecone Pine Echinacea Pinus aristata Hummingbird Mint Pinyon Pine Shadernaster Agastache'Desert Sunrise' Palmer's Pinusedulis Honeylocust Pensternion Graziella Maiden Little Bluestem Utah Juniper lii Schizachyrium scoparium Grass stills Juniperusosteosperma � _ Blonde Ambition Blue Grama Grass Water-WiseShur s Bouteloua gracilis'Blonde Ambition' Alderleaf Mountain Mahogany Shenandoah Switch Grass Cercocarpus montanus $ Panicum virgatum'Shenandoah' ¢ Apache Plume Ravenna Grass Fallugia paradoxa Saccharum ravennae New Mexico Privet Graziella Maiden Grass , Forestieraneomexicana Garnbel Oak Miscanthussinensis'Graziella' Coneflower Blue Gramma Grass Implementation ( 68 SITES Certification site during the design and construction process to ensure that sustainable To support goals for ecological restoration practices are adhered to and that the and sustainable park development,it proper documentation is collected to is recommended that the project team pursue certification.The full SITES a pursue certification in a sustainability prescore worksheet for Glendale Regional program such as SITES or another Park in Appendix A. comparable program.The project team has been exploring certification Pursuing SITES certification at Glendale -� through the Sustainable Sites Initiative Regional Park would demonstrate a tangible (SITES)for the future Glendale Regional commitment to environmental quality and justice.With historic underinvestment, Park.SITES(sustainablesites.org/)is a sustainability-focused program based lower levels of service and evidence of on the understanding that any project environmental injustices present in this has the ability to protect,improve and community in the past,having a SITES even regenerate healthy ecosystems by certified landscape in the Glendale reducing water use,filtering stormwater neighborhood would not only highlight the runoff,providing wildlife habitat,and City's investment in restorative landscapes improving air quality and human health. and climate resiliency but would also set a The SITES certification is managed by standard for site development in the future the United States Green Building Council and begin to show tangible effort towards (USGBC),the same agency that manages equitable environmental investment across the LEED rating system for buildings. the City.With SITES certification,Glendale Where LEED addresses buildings and Regional Park would be a model of best vertical construction,the SITES rating practices and environmental achievement system is used for everything related to the both locally and nationwide. landscape.Projects pursuing certification often incur higher costs in design and construction,however,they consistently return significant long term cost savings related to ongoing operations and •f, maintenance costs. During the master planning process,a SITES pre-score assessment,shown in Table 1,confirmed that the Glendale Park project meets the qualifications to pursue SITES certification.Upon scoring the project,the Glendale Regional Park Site has the potential to certify on the Platinum • ,. ,. . .,, , , level if the City elects to pursue certification • • • • • • • to the greatest extent.The project team recommends pre-certifying the entire park master plan for the 17-acre 69 ChapterTvo Table 1:SITES Certification Pre-Score SITES Scorecard Summary YES NO YES r NO Y CONTEXTPI.I Limit development on farmland HHWB C6.1 Protect and maintain cultural and historic places 2to3 Y CONTEXT PL2 Protect floodplain functions HHWB C6.2 Provide optimum site accessibility,safety,and wayfinding 2 Y CONTEXT PIC Conserve aquatic ecosystems HHWBC6.3 Promote equitable site use 2 Y CONTEXT Ph 4 Conserve habitats forthreatened and endangered species HHWBC6.4 Support mental restoration 2 CONTEXT C1.5 Redevelop degraded sites 3to6 HHWB C6.5 Support physical activity 2 CONTEXT CI.6 Locate projects within existing developed areas 4 HHWB C6.6 Support social connection 2 CONTEXTCI.7 Connectto multi-modal transit networks 2to3 HHWB C6.7 Provide on-site food production 3to4 HHWBC6.8 Reduce light pollution 4 r HHWB C6.9 Encourage fuel efficient and multi-modal transportation 4 Y PRE-DESIGN P2.1 Use an integrative design process HHWB C6.10 Minimize exposure to environmental tobacco smoke 1to2 Y PRE-DESIGN P2.2 Conduct apre-design site assessment HHWBC6.11 Support local economy 3 Y PRE-DESIGN P2.3 Designate and communicate VSPZs PRE-DESIGN C2.4 Engage users and stakeholders 3 c a Y CONSTRUCTION P7.1 Communicate and verify sustainable construction practices r Y CONSTRUCTION P72 Control and retain construction pollutants Y WATER P3.1 Manage precipitation on site Y CONSTRUCTION P7.3 Restore soils disturbed during construction Y WATER P3.2 Reduce water use for landscape irrigation CONSTRUCTION G7.4 Restore soils disturbed by previous development 3to5 WATER C3.3 Manage precipitation beyond baseline 4to6 CONSTRUCTION C75 Divert construction and demolition materials from disposal 3to4 WATER C3.4 Reduce outdoor.ater use 4to6 CONSTRUCTION C7.6 Divert reusable vegetation,rocks,and soil from disposal 3to4 WATERC3.5 Design functional stormwater features as amenities 4to5 CONSTRUCTION C7.7 Protect air quality during construction 2to4 WATER 03.6 Restore aquatic ecosystems 4to6 Y '.. 0+M P8.1 '..Plan for sustainable site maintenance Y SOIL+VEG P4.1 Create and communicate a soil management plan Y O+M P8.2 Provide for storage and collection of reeyclables Y SOIL+VEG P4.2 Control and manage invasive plants O+M C8.3 Recycle organic matter 3to5 Y SOIL+VEG P4.3 Use appropriate plants O+M 08.4 Minimize pesticide and fertilizer use 4to5 SOIL+VEG 04,4 Conserve healthy soils and appropriate vegetation 4to6 O+M 08.5 Reduce outdoor energy consumption 2to4 SOIL+VEGC4,5 Conserve special status vegetation 4 O+MC8.6 Use renewable sources for landscape electricity needs 3to4 SOIL+VEG C4,6 Conserve and use native plants 13to6 O+M C8.7 Protect air quality during landscape maintenance 2to4 SOIL+VEG C4.7 Conserve and restore native plant communities 4to6 SOIL+VEG C4.8 Optimize biomass 1to6 SOIL+VEG C4,9 Reduce urban heat island effects 4 EDUCATION C9,1 Promote sustainability awareness and education 3to4 SOIL+VEG C4,10 Use vegetation to minimize building energy use 1to4 EDUCATION C92 Develop and communicate a case study 3 SOIL+VEG 04.11 Reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire 4 EDUCATION C9.3 Plan to monitor and report site performance 4 Y MATERIALS EEL Eliminate the use ofwood from threatened tree species INNOVATION CIO.1 Innovation orexemplary performance 3to9 MATERIALS C5.2 Maintain on-site structures and paving 2to4 MATERIALS C5.3 Design for adaptability and disassembly 3to4 YES NO MATERIALS C5.4 Use salvaged materials and plants 3to4 e r •a - MATERIALSC5.5 Use recycled content materials 3to4 MATERIALS C5.6 Use regional materials 3to5 KEY ( SITES Certification levels Points MATERIALS C5.7 Support responsible extraction of raw materials 1to5 YES Project confident points are achievable CERTIFIED 70 MATERIALS CH I Support transparency and safer chemistry 1to5 ? Project striving to achieve points,not 100%confident SILVER 85 MATERIALS G5.9 Support sustainability,In materials manufacturing 5 NO Project is unable to achlevethese credit points GOLD 100 MATERIALS 05.10 Support sustainability in plant production 1to5 ( PLATINUM 135 Chapter Two ( 70 Policies,Operations&Maintenance In order to ensure the new Glendale Regional Park stays clean,active,safe and well-loved by the greater Salt Lake City community,it must be maintained and staffed accordingly along with the many amenities,natural features,and programming elements being designed.To achieve this high standard,the City will need to make special considerations for Glendale Park's operations staffing required to support the appropriate levels of security,sanitation, public realm maintenance,landscaping,programmatic operations,event needs,park concession leasing,and marketing as described below. Security A strong perception and reality of safety in the park will greatly enhance the park's ability to attract visitors,particularly families,and increase an overall sense of civic pride and support for the park.In keeping with many long established precedents for increasing the"eyes and ears"in the park,it will be important to create many positive reasons for the public to be active in the park throughout the day to dispel any would be antisocial behavior, and actively patrol the park with appropriate levels of official park staff-whether they be City park rangers or,when necessary,police.The"right"levels and types of staff will depend greatly on several design decisions including potential building/concession uses,recreation and aquatic uses,degrees of programming and events,and real time security concerns/ conditions in the neighborhood when the park opens. Many decisions around types and levels of security(and other operations)staff will depend on the ultimate physical plan and associated decisions around park management and governance-i.e.,whether the City alone will manage and program the park or whether that it will happen in partnership or coordination with a private management entity(or several). Park rules Because of the many unique features and activities planned,a set of rules should be specifically developed for Glendale Park,incorporating the City's existing rules and regulations for all public parks.An abbreviated version of those rules should be posted visibly around the park to help regulate the public use and provide clear expectations as to which activities and behaviors are acceptable and which are not.Setting these expectations and messaging them the right way will add to the public's perception of safety in the park and help park staff to enforce appropriate behavior. 71 ( Implementation During larger events(festivals,musical attention,which should be provided by Large events may incur the need for performances,larger markets)the event the concession workers.These types of additional janitorial staff to clean producer,park management entity,or services can often be negotiated as part of restrooms,pick up trash,and empty trash the City may need to employ additional, the operator agreements depending on the and recycling. contracted security staff and parking specific concession.Giving an operator the attendants. option to custom brand the tables,seats, Repairs fMaintenance trash cans,or umbrellas within the vicinity Janitorial of their space(and charging them for the There should be a streamlined process to ¢ right to do so)will motivate them to keep address maintenance issues,one that is Janitorial and sanitation issues in the public these areas and the associated furnishings not burdened with moving through many realm are often caused by a shortage of clean. chains of command or requiring excess staff,having only one shift of staff,lack of paperwork whenever possible.Staff [ Trash and recycling cans should be located 1 resources/staff that are spread too thin specifically assigned to Glendale Park, over multiple parks,or a cumbersome and at regular intervals throughout the park, either from the City or contracted through ) �d bureaucratic process for addressing issues and especially at areas of anticipated heavy a park management entity,should be as they arise.By appropriately staffing the traffic such as play areas and picnic areas, empowered to fix smaller problems under a janitorial crew and having more than one so that visitors do not have any trouble pre determined threshold promptly without shift in the day as necessary(fewer shifts finding the receptacle.Trash and recycling the need for higher levels of approval. on slow days and more/overlapping shifts should be emptied from cans multiple times on peak days),restrooms can be checked, a day and taken to a designated collection Furnishings and other items need to be cleaned,and resupplied often,trash cans point,and trash and recycling should be checked frequently and repaired upon can be emptied multiple times a day,litter moved off-site at least once a day.Trash and the first sign of an issue.This will ensure can be picked up regularly by hand,graffiti recycling cans should be paired and kept broken items do not get worse and more can be removed immediately,and other together(or split between one receptacle difficult to fix and avoid potential injury/ small issues can be addressed a timely but clearly distinguished),otherwise park liability concerns.Fixing them right away manner before snowballing into more patrons will throw whatever they are also shows the public that furnishings significant,more costly problems.If the disposing into whichever receptacle is and facilities in the park are cared for and park is maintained with a high standard closest,regardless of its intended contents. looked after.If visitors observe a well- maintained park,they are more likely of cleanliness,expectations will be raised Thejanitorial staff should take care of minor to follow suit and take good care of the and perceptions of care will spread to the repairs such as repainting over graffiti, public ark with furnishings and facilities themselves. p p tightening a leaky faucet,or patching a hole respect.Park cleanliness will also impact in the concrete.Larger maintenance and Thejanitorial staff will address smaller perceptions of safety to the community. repair projects will be tasked to the capital issues such as replacing broken trash Concession staff,if applicable,should projects staff and contractors.Janitorial cans,cleaning out the drains of drinking augment janitorial staff in the immediate staff should also be tasked with everyday fountains,screwing in a door hinge, area of the concessions.When there is a landscape upkeep including weeding, replacing light bulbs,and painting over slower moment,concession staff should sweeping up excess leaf litter and plant graffiti.An Operations Manager or similar regularly wipe tables,pick up trash,empty debris,and reporting irrigation leaks, position should oversee capital projects, trash cans,straighten tables and chairs, irrigation malfunction,or poor plant health major repairs,and landscape maintenance. 1 and even service restrooms.Concession to a supervisor. This manager will also oversee third-party areas have heavy use and require special contractors who would take care of larger Implementation 72 and more specialized maintenance and site.Tree root ball moisture and shrub and within the park.The leasing agents should repair needs such as fixing plumbing issues, groundcover surrounding soil moisture focus on an operator mix that supports repairing broken stairs,electrical repairs, should be checked weekly and watering Glendale Park's overall programming/ building maintenance,etc.Ideallythis would cycles adjusted accordingly.Watering activity goals,focuses on local businesses, be a dedicated person to Glendale Park,or records should be kept for all site trees and has a quality/healthful product,delivers someone who oversees multiple parks with a yearly water audit should be performed to on financial objectives,and supports the appropriate support staff. track the amount of water applied.With this needs of the surrounding neighborhood. information,Public Lands can determine Partnerships or City programs that work During major repairs,trees and plant appropriate water application for site trees independently and/or with leasing agents materials should be protected with fences after the three-year establishment period to support no or low-cost activities will be or other barriers to prevent damage.Heavy meet should not be left or stored equipment ends,in consultation with Urban Forestry's important to include as regular options for q p review of tree health on the site.Irrigation Glendale Park programming. under the branches of trees,as this can systems will need frequent inspection and cause root damage,or for extended periods cleaning ensure the system is running Marketing for Glendale Park offerings on lawn. properly. should start with a dedicated website and social media accounts(primarily Instagram Landscape/Tree Landscape/Tree Crews should weed planted areas and Facebook)that are frequently updated Maintenancefrequently,maintain the depth of mulch with news and happenings.A dedicated Management to reduce evaporation and inhibit weed online presence is the best way for visitors growth,and apply fertilizers as needed. to find out about programs and events Trees and understory require attention Crews will employ principles of Integrated happening in the park and nearby public/ on a consistent and on-going basis.The Pest Management to prevent plant pests City affairs.The website will also serve landscape maintenance crew should have and diseases.Landscape maintenance as a tool for customer service,a guide for demonstrated experience in maintenance should be performed during regular work private event permitting,a place to receive of public landscape projects of similar size hours to not disturb the nearby residents inquiries,comments,and complaints. and scope with owner references,and with noise. It's important for these outlets to be demonstrated experience with integrated An important part of a maintenance plan the dedicated responsibility of one staff pest management,pest control,soils, member or contractor,rather than spread p g p for Glendale Park will be a landscape to several undefined staff so this important fertilizers,and plant identification. feature/materials inventory with suggested ' element doesn't become neglected in favor Assuming proper installation,trees and maintenance and a working checklist of staff's primary responsibilities. understory will need regular inspection than can provided as for the landscape by Public Land's Urban Forestry Division maintenance crew. to ensure proper growth.Pruning weak branches and shaping tree crowns will Leasing/Marketing help sustain long-term health,growth,and Leasing and partnership agreements, appearance. either through the relevant City agency As trees and plant material are put in the or through a park management entity, ground,flow meters should be installed will select the appropriate tenants for any that monitor all irrigation hydrazones for kiosks,cafe space,river concessions,and appropriate water application across the any other commercially operable spaces 73 Implementation Programmingi ti Programming Budgt and budgets fall short,the park programming Table 2:Programming&Activation Budget Recommended Minimum Staffing manager will be able to leverage m ' programming partners and interested On site programming manager $76,000 Base starting salary of$60,OOO annually,Budget To support a vibrant and dynamic groups to provide in-kind donations of includes fringe benefits. Glendale Regional Park,a dedicated time and materials,sponsorships,and Park attendants $18,200 16 hrs/wkyear round,$17.50 wage plus 25%fully loaded. park programming manager should be other sources that reduce capital outlays. Overtime allowance $4,550 May also be used for discretionary bonuses put in place,as well as a dedicated and Providing a baseline budget of some Administration/insurance - Assumes covered by City poliices predictable budget that grows over time amount allows the programming manager Equipment/supplies $10,000 Laptop for manager,smartphones/tablets for through revenue development.The park to plan accordingly and approach potential attendant use,general supplies should be viewed as a business,with profits partners more efficiently.Over time,the and losses,except that all profits should be budget hopefully grows,with revenue made with the public interest in mind and, sources coming from a variety of potential thus,reinvested back into the park for the sources:philanthropy,sponsorships,event gi benefit of local residents and visitors. rentals,food and beverage,programming, Arts&culture $80,000 Two-thirds of this cost is annual,cutting edge and government support. interactive art installations The park programming manager would Fitness $30,000 Mostly provided by free businesses seeking to be an on-site Public Lands employee, markettheir classes but assigned specifically to Glendale Hobbies&niche interests $45,000 Includes outdoor dancing,which is about one- Regional Park on a day-to-day basis with third of the total budget Live entertainment $100,000 Does not include production costs,which will be a flexible schedule that likely includes a minimal five-day,Wednesday to Sunday schedule to Markets&festivals $100,000 Allowance for self-produced events complement active times in the park.The programming manager will be dedicated to coordinating with programming partners, interacting with park visitors,overseeing day-to-day management of facilities Marketing $50,000 Limited to promotion surrounding public space maintenance,and managing vendors programs and events and contractors.The park programming Holiday decorations $100,000 Allowance manager is the pork's"mayor."The UNNMEMENMENEEM ideal manager will have experience in events management,and/or marketing, communications,urban planning,and business.The programming manager should also have access to park attendants on a part-time,as needed basis during busier times in the park and special events. As a baseline,the park should also have a dedicated programming budget that allows for a varied experience.Programming budgets are used to provide equipment, marketing,outreach,and supplies.Where Implementation ( 74 SiFectrurn of Private/Public Partnership Governing Partnership Management Activation and programming strategies, • ; _ ; ' specifically around revenue development and sponsorship opportunities,benefit greatly by the management structure that is in place.Public agencies will be able to do things the private sector can't,and vice versa.Exploring existing frameworks and establishing programming and activation guidelines within those constraints will inform optimal programming strategies. 75 ( Implementation Next Steps To meet the rapid timeline required to open the park with publicly accessible recreation, detailed design and construction of Phase I elements will begin in August of 2022, concurrent to the adoption of the master plan.This process will entail refining specific park features and styles,as well as forming a strategy to re-purpose the old water slides into park features or artwork.Programming opportunities with community partners will continue to be developed to ensure that the park remains an active space upon opening and throughout the development and construction process. 4' The project team will also begin to rehabilitate the site with riparian and native vegetation to fulfill the park goals of enhancing environmental quality and improving environmental justice for the Glendale neighborhood.To support this goal,it is recommended that the project team pursue certification in a sustainability program such as SITES or another comparable program.During the master planning process,a SITES prescore assessment p confirmed that the Glendale Park project meets the qualifications to pursue SITES certification.As the project consultant moves into the next design phase,this consideration should be integrated into the process to ensure that sustainable practices are adhered to and that the proper documentation is collected to pursue certification.The full SITES prescore worksheet for Glendale Regional Park is in Appendix A. Implementation 1 76 Contents APPENDIX A Sites pr •scr APPENDIX B Ecological Assessment APPENDIX C Restoration Play Appendices APPENDIX D Market Study Appendix) 78 Appendix A SITES Pre-Score SITES Certification& r Glendale Regional Park goals include enhancing environmental quality and improving environmental justice for the Glendale neighborhood.To support this goal,it is recommended that the project team pursue certification in a sustainability program such as SITES or another comparable program.SITES,the landscape equivalent of LEED certification,is a sustainability framework and program that ensures best practices are adhered to during land development projects,resulting in enhanced ecosystems and landscape benefits such as"climate regulation,carbon storage and flood mitigation."' During the master planning process,a SITES prescore assessment confirmed that the Glendale Park project meets the qualifications to pursue SITES certification.As the project consultant moves into the next design phase,this consideration should be integrated into the process to ensure that sustainable practices are adhered to and that the proper documentation is collected to pursue certification.Appendix A includes the full SITES prescore worksheet and assessment for Glendale Regional Park. I https://sustainablesites.org/certification-guide MMC4endaleMEMEM MEN Regkxml Park MENEM Master PlanIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIS YES ? NO YES ? NO 0 0 0 1:SITE CONTEXT Possible Points: 13 0 0 0 6:SITE DESIGN-HUMAN HEALTH+WELL-BEING Possible Points: 30 Y CONTEXT P1.1 Limit development on farmland M HHWB C6.1 Protect and maintain cultural and historic places 2 to 3 Y CONTEXT P1.2 Protect floodplain functions HHWB C6.2 Provide optimum site accessibility,safety,and wayfinding 2 Y CONTEXT P1.3 Conserve aquatic ecosystems HHWB C6.3 Promote equitable site use 2 Y CONTEXT P1.4 Conserve habitats for threatened and endangered species � HHWB C6.4 Support mental restoration 2 CONTEXT C1.5 Redevelop degraded sites 3 to 6 HHWB C6.5 Support physical activity 2 CONTEXT C1.6 Locate projects within existing developed areas 4 HHWB C6.6 Support social connection 2 CONTEXT C1.7 Connect to multi-modal transit networks 2 to 3 HHWB C6.7 Provide on-site food production 3 to 4 HHWB C6.8 Reduce light pollution 4 0 0 0 2:PRE-DESIGN ASSESSMENT+PLANNING Possible Points: 3 HHWB C6.9 Encourage fuel efficient and multi-modal transportation 4 Y PRE-DESIGN P2.1 Use an integrative design process HHWB C6.10 Minimize exposure to environmental tobacco smoke 1 to 2 Y PRE-DESIGN P2.2 Conduct a pre-design site assessment HHWB C6.11 Support local economy 3 Y PRE-DESIGN P2.3 Designate and communicate VSPZs PRE-DESIGN C2.4 Engage users and stakeholders 3 0 0 0 7:CONSTRUCTION Possible Points: 17 Y CONSTRUCTION P7.1 Communicate and verify sustainable construction practices 0 0 0 3:SITE DESIGN-WATER Possible Points: 23 Y CONSTRUCTION P7.2 Control and retain construction pollutants Y WATER P3.1 Manage precipitation on site j Y CONSTRUCTION P7.3 Restore soils disturbed during construction Y WATER P3.2 Reduce water use for landscape irrigation CONSTRUCTION C7.4 Restore soils disturbed by previous development 3 to 5 WATER C3.3 Manage precipitation beyond baseline 4 to 6 CONSTRUCTION C7.5 Divert construction and demolition materials from disposal 3 to 4 WATER C3.4 Reduce outdoor water use 4 to 6 CONSTRUCTION C7.6 Divert reusable vegetation,rocks,and soil from disposal 3 to 4 WATER C3.5 Design functional stormwater features as amenities 4 to 5 CONSTRUCTION C7.7 Protect air quality during construction 2 to 4 WATER C3.6 Restore aquatic ecosystems 4 to 6 0 0 0 8.OPERATIONS+MAINTENANCE Possible Points: 22 0 0 0 4:SITE DESIGN-SOIL+VEGETATION Possible Points: 40 Y O+M P8.1 Plan for sustainable site maintenance Y SOIL+VEG P4.1 Create and communicate a soil management plan Y O+M P8.2 Provide for storage and collection of recyclables Y SOIL+VEG P4.2 Control and manage invasive plants O+M C8.3 Recycle organic matter 3 to 5 Y SOIL+VEG P4.3 Use appropriate plants O+M C8.4 Minimize pesticide and fertilizer use 4 to 5 SOIL+VEG C4.4 Conserve healthy soils and appropriate vegetation 4 to 6 O+M C8.5 Reduce outdoor energy consumption 2 to 4 SOIL+VEG C4.5 Conserve special status vegetation 4 O+M C8.6 Use renewable sources for landscape electricity needs 3 to 4 SOIL+VEG C4.6 Conserve and use native plants 3 to 6 O+M C8.7 Protect air quality during landscape maintenance 2 to 4 SOIL+VEG C4.7 Conserve and restore native plant communities 4 to 6 SOIL+VEG C4.8 Optimize biomass 1 to 6 0 0 0 9.EDUCATION+PERFORMANCE MONITORING Possible Points: 11 SOIL+VEG C4.9 Reduce urban heat island effects 4 EDUCATION C9.1 Promote sustainability awareness and education 3 to 4 SOIL+VEG C4.10 Use vegetation to minimize building energy use 1 to 4 EDUCATION C9.2 Develop and communicate a case study 3 SOIL+VEG C4.11 Reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire 4 EDUCATION C9.3 Plan to monitor and report site performance 4 0 0 0 5:SITE DESIGN-MATERIALS SELECTION Possible Points: 41 0 0 0 10.INNOVATION OR EXEMPLARY PERFORMANCE Bonus Points: 9 Y MATERIALS P5.1 Eliminate the use of wood from threatened tree species WE INNOVATION C10.1 Innovation or exemplary performance 3 to 9 MATERIALS C5.2 Maintain on-site structures and paving 2 to 4 MATERIALS C5.3 Design for adaptability and disassembly 3 to 4 YES ? NO MATERIALS C5.4 Use salvaged materials and plants 3 to 4 MATERIALS C5.5 Use recycled content materials 3 to 4 MATERIALS C5.6 Use regional materials 3 to 5 KEY SITES Certification levels Points MATERIALS C5.7 Support responsible extraction of raw materials 1 to 5 YES Project confident points are achievable CERTIFIED 70 MATERIALS C5.8 Support transparency and safer chemistry 1 to 5 ? Project striving to achieve points,not 100%confident SILVER 85 Page 1 of 7 7/27/2022 Copyright©2014 Project Name: Project ID#: Date: MATERIALS C5.9 Support sustainability in materials manufacturing 5 NO Project is unable to achieve these credit points GOLD 100 MATERIALS C5.10 Support sustainability in plant production 1 to 5 PLATINUM 135 Page 2 of 7 7/27/2022 Copyright©2014 Glendale EM Regional Park Master Plan r Estimate points z below(key at a r bottom) PREREQUISITE OR z YES ? NO CREDIT# TITLE CASE/OPTION/THRESHOLD d a a 7 3 0 1:SITE CONTEXT Possible Points: 13 POPE Case 1:Sites without farmland soils Y CONTEXT P1.1 Limit development on farmland Case 2:Sites with farmland soils-VSPZ Case 3:Sites with farmland soils-Mitigation Case 1:Sites without floodplain Y CONTEXT P1.2 Protect floodplain functions Case 2:Previously developed and brownfield sites within floodplain Case 3:Greenfield sites within floodplain Case 1:Sites without aquatic ecosystems Y CONTEXT P1.3 Conserve aquatic ecosystems Case 2:Sites with naturally occurring aquatic ecosystems Case 3:Sites with naturally occurring poor quality aquatic ecosystems Y CONTEXT P1.4 Conserve habitats for threatened and Case 1:Brownfields and previously developed sites endangered species Case 2:Greenfield sites Case 1:Previously developed sites 3 3 CONTEXT C3.5 Redevelop degraded sites 3 to 6 Case 2:Brownfield sites 6 4 CONTEXT C3.6 Locate projects within existing developed 4 4 areas Option 1:Pedestrian and bicycle network 2 3 CONTEXT C1.7 Connect to multi-modal transit networks 2 to 3 Option 2:Transit network 3 3 0 0 2:PRE-DESIGN ASSESSMENT+PLANNING Possible Points: 3 Y PRE-DESIGN P2.1 Use an integrative design process Y PRE-DESIGN P2.2 Conduct a pre-design site assessment Y PRE-DESIGN P2.3 Designate and communicate Vegetation and Soil Protection Zones 3 PRE-DESIGN C2.4 Engage users and stakeholders 3 3 0 12 11 3:SITE DESIGN-WATER Possible Points: 23 Y WATER P3.1 Manage precipitation on site Y M 01, WATER P3.2 Reduce water use for landscape irrigation 80th percentile precipitation event 4 6 WATER C3.3 Manage precipitation beyond baseline 90th percentile precipitation event 5 4 to 6 95th percentile precipitation event 6 Option 1:Reduce outdoor water use 4 6 WATER C3.4 Reduce outdoor water use Option 2:Significantly reduce outdoor water use 5 4 to 6 Option 3:Eliminate outdoor water use 6 Design functional stormwater features as 50%of stormwater features 4 5 WATER C3.5 4 to 5 amenities 100%of stormwater features 5 No aquatic ecosystems present on site Emm 6 WATER C3.6 Restore aquatic ecosystems 30%of the geographic extent 4 (project must have existing feature) 60%of the geographic extent 5 4 to 6 Page 3 of 7 7/27/2022 ©Sustainable Sites Initiative— Project Name: Project ID#: Date: r Estimate points Z below(key at a r bottom) PREREQUISITE OR z YES ? NO CREDIT# TITLE CASE/OPTION/THRESHOLD d a a 90%of the geographic extent 6 0 1 34 6 4:SITE DESIGN-SOIL+VEGETATION Possible Points: 40 Y SOIL+VEG P4.1 Create and communicate a soil management plan Case 1:No invasive plants found on site Y SOIL+VEG P4.2 Control and manage invasive plants Case 2:Invasive plants identified on site Y SOIL+VEG P4.3 Use appropriate plants =I No healthy soils and/or appropriate vegetation present on site Conserve healthy soils and appropriate 50%of the site's existing vegetated area 4 6 SOIL+VEG C4.4 vegetation (project must have existing feature) 75%of the site's existing vegetated area 5 4 to 6 95%of the site's existing vegetated area 6 Conserve special status vegetation 4 SOIL+VEG C4.5 4 4 (project must have existing feature) 20%total native plant score 3 6 SOIL+VEG C4.6 Conserve and use native plants 40%total native plant score 4 3 to 6 60%total native plant score 6 20%total native plant community score 4 Conserve and restore native plant 6 SOIL+VEG C4.7 40%total native plant community score 5 4 to 6 communities 60%total native plant community score 6 minimal point score 1 low point score 3 6 SOIL+VEG C4.8 Optimize biomass 1 to 6 mid point score 5 high point score 6 4 SOIL+VEG C4.9 Reduce urban heat island effects 4 4 No buildings present on site Option 1:Reduce energy use-5%reduction 2 Option 1:Reduce energy use-7%reduction 4 Use vegetation to minimize building energy 4 SOIL+VEG C4.10 use Option 2:Provide shade structures-30%shaded 1 (project must have building on site) 1 to 4 Option 2:Provide shade structures-60%shaded 2 Option 3:Provide a windbreak-one row 1 Option 3:Provide a windbreak-two or more rows 2 4 SOIL+VEG C4.11 Reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire Project not in a fire-prone area (project must be located in fire-prone area) Project is in a fire-prone area 4 4 0 41 0 S:SITE DESIGN-MATERIALS SELECTION Possible Points: 41 Y MATERIALS P5.1 Eliminate the use of wood from threatened tree species No structures or paving present on site 4 MATERIALS C5.2 Maintain on-site structures and paving 10%of the total existing built surface area 2 (project must have existing feature) 20%of the total existing built surface area 3 2 to 4 30%of the total existing built surface area 4 Page 4 of 7 7/27/2022 ©Sustainable Sites Initiative— Project Name: Project ID#: Date: r Estimate points Z below(key at a r bottom) PREREQUISITE OR z YES ? NO CREDIT# TITLE CASE/OPTION/THRESHOLD d a a 30%of total materials cost,excluding plants,rocks,and soils 3 4 MATERIALS C5.3 Design for adaptability and disassembly 3 to 4 60%of total materials cost,excluding plants,rocks,and soils 4 10%of total materials cost,excluding soils 3 4 MATERIALS C5.4 Use salvaged materials and plants 3 to 4 20%of total materials cost,excluding soils 4 20%of total materials cost,excluding plants and soils 3 4 MATERIALS C5.5 Use recycled content materials 3 to 4 40%of total materials cost,excluding plants and soils 4 30%of total materials cost 3 5 MATERIALS C5.6 Use regional materials 60%of total materials cost 4 3 to 5 90%of total materials cost 5 Option 1:Advocate for sustainable extraction of raw materials 1 Support responsible extraction of raw 5 MATERIALS C5.7 Option 2:Support suppliers that disclose environmental data 3 1 to 5 materials Option 3:Support suppliers that meet extraction standards 5 Option 1:Advocate for transparency and safer chemistry 1 5 MATERIALS C5.8 Support transparency and safer chemistry Option 2:Support manufacturers that disclose chemical data 3 1 to 5 Option 3:Support manufacturers with chemical hazard assessments 5 Option 1:Advocate for sustainable materials manufacturing 1 Support sustainability in materials 5 MATERIALS C5.9 Option 2:Support manufacturers that disclose data on sustainable practices 3 1 to 5 manufacturing Option 3:Support manufacturers that achieve sustainable practices 5 Option 1:Advocate for sustainable plant production 1 5 MATERIALS C5.10 Support sustainability in plant production Option 2:Support producers that disclose data on sustainable practices 3 1 to 5 Option 3:Support producers that achieve sustainable practices 5 2 23 4 6:SITE DESIGN-HUMAN HEALTH+WELL-BEING Possible Points: 30 No cultural or historic places present on site Protect and maintain cultural and historic 2 HHWB C6.1 places Option 1:Historic buildings,structures,or objects 2 (project must have existing feature) 2 to 3 Option 2:Historic or cultural landscapes 3 2 HHWB C6.2 Provide optimum site accessibility,safety,and 2 2 wayfinding 2 HHWB C6.3 Promote equitable site use 2 2 2 HHWB C6.4 Support mental restoration 2 2 2 HHWB C6.5 Support physical activity 2 2 2 HHWB C6.6 Support social connection 2 2 Option 1:Food production 3 0 4 HHWB C6.7 Provide on-site food production 3 to 4 Option 2:Food production and regular distribution 4 4 HHWB C6.8 Reduce light pollution 4 4 4 HHWB C6.9 Encourage fuel efficient and multi-modal 4 4 transportation Minimize exposure to environmental tobacco Option 1:Designate smoke free zones 1 2 HHWB C6.10 1 to 2 smoke Option 2:Prohibit smoking on site 2 3 HHWB C6.11 Support local economy 3 3 Page 5 of 7 7/27/2022 ©Sustainable Sites Initiative" Project Name: Project ID#: Date: r Estimate points Z below(key at a r bottom) PREREQUISITE OR z YES ? NO CREDIT# TITLE CASE/OPTION/THRESHOLD d a a 0 1 17 0 7:CONSTRUCTION Possible Points: 17 Y CONSTRUCTION P7.1 Communicate and verify sustainable construction practices Y CONSTRUCTION P7.2 Control and retain construction pollutants Y CONSTRUCTION P7.3 Restore soils disturbed during construction low point score 3 5 CONSTRUCTION C7.4 Restore soils disturbed by previous mid point score 4 3 to 5 development high point score 5 Divert construction and demolition materials 50%of structural materials+95%of roads/infrastructure materials 3 4 CONSTRUCTION C7.5 3 to 4 from disposal 75%of structural materials+95%of roads/infrastructure materials 4 Divert reusable vegetation,rocks,and soil 100%of land clearing materials retained for use within 50 miles 3 4 CONSTRUCTION C7.6 3 to 4 from disposal 100%of land-clearing materials retained on site 4 50%total run-time hours from Tier 2 or higher engines 2 4 CONSTRUCTION C7.7 Protect air quality during construction 50%total run-time hours from Tier 3 or higher engines 3 2 to 4 50%total run-time hours from Tier 4 or higher engines 4 0 1 22 0 8.OPERATIONS+MAINTENANCE Possible Points: 22 Y O+M P8.1 Plan for sustainable site maintenance Y O+M P8.2 Provide for storage and collection of recyclables 100%of vegetation trimmings recycled/composted off site within 50 miles 3 5 O+M C8.3 Recycle organic matter 100%of vegetation trimmings recycled/composted on site 4 3 to 5 100%of vegetation trimmings+food waste recycled/composted on site 5 Option 1:Plant health care plan 4 5 O+M C8.4 Minimize pesticide and fertilizer use 4 to 5 Option 2:Best management practices for plant health care 5 30%reduction from baseline energy use for outdoor equipment 2 4 O+M C8.5 Reduce outdoor energy consumption 60%reduction from baseline energy use for outdoor equipment 3 2 to 4 90%reduction from baseline energy use for outdoor equipment 4 Option 1:On-site-50%annual outdoor site electricity 3 Use renewable sources for landscape Option 1:On-site-100%annual outdoor site electricity 4 4 O+M C8.6 3 to 4 electricity needs Option 2:Green power-50%annual outdoor site electricity 3 Option 2:Green power-100%annual outdoor site electricity 4 Option 1:Scheduled maintenance 2 Protect air quality during landscape 4 O+M C8.7 Option 2:Low-emitting equipment 3 2 to 4 maintenance Option 3:Manual or electric powered maintenance equipment 4 0 11 0 9.EDUCATION+PERFORMANCE MONITORING Possible Points: 11 Promote sustainability awareness and Option 1:Educational and interpretive elements 3 4 EDUCATION C9.1 3 to 4 education Option 2:Additional education 4 3 EDUCATION C9.2 Develop and communicate a case study 3 3 Page 6 of 7 7/27/2022 ©Sustainable Sites Initiative— Project Name: Project ID#: Date: r Estimate points z below(key at a r bottom) PREREQUISITE OR z YES ? NO CREDIT# TITLE CASE/OPTION/THRESHOLD d a a 4 EDUCATION C9.3 Plan to monitor and report site performance ] 4 4 0 1 9 1 0 10.INNOVATION OR EXEMPLARY PERFORMANCE Possible Bonus Points: 9 9 INNOVATION C10.1 Innovation or exemplary performance Option 1:Exemplary performance 3 3 to 9 (BONUS POINTS) Option 2:Innovation outside the SITES v2 Rating System 3 YES ? NO 172 21 ® : =- KEY SITES Certification levels Points YES Project confident points are achievable CERTIFIED 70 ? Project striving to achieve points,not 100%confident SILVER 85 NO Project is unable to achieve these credit points GOLD 100 PLATINUM 135 Page 7 of 7 7/27/2022 ©Sustainable Sites Initiative— Appendix B Ecological Assessment Olendale MWWRegional Park IIIIIIIIIIINEIRMaste Plan Glendale Regional Park Master Plan Ecological Assessment September 21, 2021 RiverRestoration conducted a site visit of the Glendale Regional Park on August 23,2021,to evaluate the current ecological conditions of the project area and to determine what features should be retained for ecological reasons. This inventory resulted in the identification of mature sycamore within the park,other mature trees along 1700 South,and river edge habitats that should be retained.Areas for potential enhancement were also identified and include all existing riparian forest and a buffer of 50-300' from the river.Areas closer to the river are likely to be closer to the groundwater,thus representing opportunities for riparian enhancement with less long-term need for irrigation. The irrigation system was tested and determined to be mostly out of commission and in need of replacement. The connection to service was identified in the northeast corner of the project area for future irrigation infrastructure. City staff will evaluate and install a temporary system to existing trees along the park strip on 1700 South.The sycamores and river edge trees are likely to be in contact with the shallow groundwater and it is recommended that a few shallow groundwater monitoring wells be installed when machinery is on site. The local and regional context was evaluated to determine if there are any adjacent City properties that would enhance the ecological functioning of this area and several local enhancement projects were identified. Additionally, students from Glendale Middle School have previously provided stewardship for areas just downstream of the project and Jordan River Park.The future stewardship of the natural areas in the vicinity of the project should involve local schools and community partners. The Jordan River upstream of the project was also observed to identify opportunities for a broader connection to the river both up and downstream.Development of on-water opportunities is one of the highest values of the site from a stewardship perspective. Locations up and downstream of the project were mapped and are provided as a KML file. Photos were taken of the site and noxious weeds were identified for treatment and control. City Natural Open Space staff committed to aggressive treatment of puncturevine across the site and stated they would deploy these resources in August. Plans for the trimming of vegetation and removal of garbage and debris stuck in the Russian olive along the river edge were also discussed and will be completed over the winter by City staff. 1 1 1' ag Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment I PVER 1234 South 900 East Salt Lake City,LIT 84150 1970.947.9568 Current Ecological Conditions The current state of the riparian forest in and around the project area is in a degraded condition. Some of the existing large trees within the project area have a high value, since they are well established and seem to be healthy. The trees along the Jordan River are mostly pioneer invasive trees and shrubs,primarily Russian olives.While these trees are considered invasive,complete removal of these trees would adversely impact riparian birds in the area due to loss of habitat and cover. We propose that the Russian olives along the riverbank be retained until an irrigation system and native riparian forest can be planned and implemented.Any removal of trees should occur outside the nesting season for resident and migratory birds [preferably September through February]. Map 1 shows areas of existing riparian tress that could be retained. Only the sycamore trees should be considered to absolutely protect in place,since they are mature,well-established,and healthy.The remaining groves of trees can be evaluated on a case-by-case basis for phased removal or replacement with planted and irrigated multi-layer riparian areas. The demo of existing infrastructure provides opportunity to repurpose the low-lying areas with riparian vegetation,improving the riparian buffer and enhancing ecological education opportunities. We propose that the old wave pool(east side of the project) be repurposed into a wetland/riparian zone. Further opportunities exist to connect the east of the wave pool to the current boat launch/take out with native plant species and interactive and educational signs. The existing trees along the park strip at the north of the project area should be preserved,with the irrigation system re-established to maintain this important buffer from 1700 south. g e Map 1. Local ecological areas of importance. 2 1' agc Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment I PVER 1234 South 900 East Salt Lake City,LIT 84150 1970.947.9568 Zeal and Regional Connections The Glendale Regional Park is in a central part of Salt Lake City but is also centrally located along the riparian corridor of the Jordan River,which provides a key connection of riparian habitats for resident and migratory birds. The site is located along the flyway between Utah Lake and Great Salt Lake and provides a potential stopover location for resting migratory birds.There is also potential for increased areas of higher quality riparian habitat with a multi-canopy layer structure. Robust riparian habitats consist of canopy's that could have several layers of complexity including large trees, small trees and shrubs,grasses,and forbs [flowers].This multi-layer structure is beneficial for creating a diverse ecosystem that will be more resilient to future changes in climate and ecosystem processes. Surrounding regional areas that are owned by SLC adjacent to the golf course and in other open areas offer great opportunity to be enhanced for riparian functioning and flood capacity. .7 1 r11 r a, � o rP- wr 7 Map 2. Regional ecologically important areas 3 1' agc Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment I PVER 1234 South 900 East Salt Lake City,LIT 84150 1970.947.9568 Site Preparation We recommend that treatments are conducted on invasive species in preparation for future disturbances.The main focal species for control include puncturevine and Russian olive. Use the proper herbicide to control puncturevine across the hillside.Much of the puncturevine is located up on the hill with the slides.Treatments should occur 2-3 times a year, starting in August 2021 [stated verbally on site with meeting],follow up treatments should be conducted starting in June/July 2022,depending on the weather and phenology of the plants. An initial trimming of the Russian olive along the river should be conducted from a boat in fall2021 to free up garbage and debris that have become stuck in the low-hanging branches.A floating oil boom or turbidity curtain can be installed across the river at the existing boat ramp to gather and remove floating garbage and debris. Potential Access Areas River access can be developed by creating easier entry for canoes and kayaks.The water quality is an issue, so swimming should be discouraged,but as the water quality may be better in the future,water access should not be completely cut off.Additional small boat access locations should be evaluated to create a more local scale river recreation circulation pattern.The figures below provide some ideas for river access that does not encourage swimming. Figure 1. Jordan River access steps at Big Bend Habitat in West Jordan, UT 4 1' agc Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment I PVER 1234 South 900 East Salt Lake City,LIT 84150 1970.947.9568 Figure 2. Jordan River Big Bend Habitat canoe access in West Jordan, UT k Figure 3. Price River in Helper, UT river access beach 5 l' agc Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment I PVER 1234 South 900 East Salt Lake City,LIT 84150 1970.947.9568 a Figure 4. Price River access steps in Helper, UT r < � � 1 w r Figure S. Ogden River ADA fishing access pier in Ogden, UT 6 l' agc Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment I PVER 1234 South 900 East Salt Lake City,LIT 84150 1970.947.9568 AN f r , Figure 6. Ogden River ADA access ramp in Ogden, UT t , iti' F a ab' Figure 6. River overlook in the Pacific Northwest 7 l' agc Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment IVER 1234 South 900 East Salt Lake City,LIT 84150 1970.947.9568 r kr il r Figure 7. Colorado River overlook in Glendale Springs,CO Conclusion The main conclusions of the site visit provide direction for the near-term management of invasive species on the site in preparation for future disturbance of the project site for development of the regional park. Managing invasive species on the site for 2-3 years before the site disturbance will reduce the number and pervasiveness of invasive species and will also begin to develop a human presence in the area doing maintenance,thus reducing the perception of the area as abandoned. The Glendale Regional Park offers great opportunity to improve and expand the ecological function of the riparian habitat along the Jordan River.Mature vegetation should be protected,irrigation throughout the site reinitiated,and a process to phase out nonnative trees should be implemented in conjunction with planting native riparian plants. The central location of the project site offers great opportunity to connect with the surrounding environment, provide the community areas to recreate in nature,and provide high quality habitat for resident and migratory birds. 8 1 1' agc Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment Appendix C Restortatmion Plan IMMEMINIMIGIlendale MMMMIkegitmal Park MEMEMMINIMMaste Plan 2022 Glendale Regional Park Restoration Noxious Weed Management a n Developed as part of the Jordan River Commission Best Practices for Riverfront Communities Primary Focus Area Glendale Regional Park Project PURPOSE: This document was created to provide guidance for an Adaptive Management Strategy to control noxious and invasive plant species at the Glendale Regional Park Project in Salt Lake City, Utah. This document represents a template that can be used on other sites along the Jordan River in Salt Lake City, where site specific data on noxious weed locations can be used to develop site specific action plans. Overall, our goal is to improve the management of these lands for the benefit of people and wildlife by reducing the cover of noxious and invasive plants and increasing the cover of native and desirable plants.The following recommendations may need to be changed based upon site specific needs and resources that are available. Any and all use of herbicides must be done by licensed applicators and those applicators must read, understand, and follow label requirements for the use of herbicides. Weed Control Instructions and Best Practices: 1. Always use the proper methods to deal with the plant species on your project; 2. Always read the label for any herbicides that will be used and follow specific requirements; 3. Be familiar with the target species, control methods, and appropriate follow up methods to ensure success; 4. Take proper precautions in protecting your personal health and safety and the health of the environment; S. Ensure weather conditions are appropriate for the use of any herbicides; 6. Post signs were appropriate to alert the public about the use of any herbicides; 7. Collect as much information as possible on treatment areas such as: location of treatments, timing of treatments, follow up actions required to ensure success; 8. AND only use herbicides where you have obtained express consent from the land owner to conduct treatments. HOW TO - Five Step Approach: Prevention • Prioritize invasive species control where recent or future land disturbance is anticipated • Identify pathways or "vectors" of invasive species introduction and spread and try to understand the potential impact of those species on native ecosystems • Work with surrounding land owners to reduce spread from surrounding properties Early detection and rapid response • Use this guidance document to improve detection and identification of invasive plant species • Document occurrence of new species not included in this plan yearly using EDDMaps • Coordinate response efforts to eradicate species before establishment and spread with all stakeholders working within and adjacent to the Big Bend Control and management • Follow both short- and long-term recommendations in this Big Bend Restoration Plan to restore and enhance native and desirable plants that will withstand future changes in weather and climate • Limit spread of existing infestations by targeted eradication or population suppression (using mechanical, biological, and chemical methods) • Implement a variety of methods to improve the outcomes of treatments (i.e. Integrated Pest Management Approach) • Work with surrounding land owners to control surrounding invasive species populations Revegetation • Select site adapted species of plants that can compete against invasive weeds once established • Develop site specific plans for installation of"habitat patches" of riparian plants based upon local soils and access to surface and groundwater • Seed any disturbed areas soon after disturbance has ceased and make sure to properly prepare soils for seeding • Follow up on any revegetation actions for at least five years to ensure establishment of new plants Monitoring • Monitor before and after control methods to ensure progress is being made on controlling existing infestations and new infestations are not becoming established Site Specific Indications for the Glendale Regional Park Based upon site assessments completed in the late summer of 2021 and spring of 2022, it appears that there are only a few areas that need aggressive weed control for hoary cress, Scotch thistle, and puncturevine. The treatments that occurred in 2021 appear to have been effective at reducing the cover and seed production of the puncturevine on the big hill. Additional work was done along the riverbanks to reduce the cover of Russian olives. Treatments proposed for summer and fall of 2022 include follow up on the work completed in 2021 and aggressive treatment of secondary invasion of hoary cress and phragmites in areas along the riverbanks where Russian olive was cut down. The remaining material left from the Russian olive cutting should be retained on site to protect any new plants from wind and sun. The branches remaining can be piled into small windrows and hoary cress and phragmites should be treated as soon as possible. Areas identified for future riparian forests should be planted with container plants with drip irrigation this fall (November 2022). Areas where Russian olive was removed should be the top priority for restoration of riparian forests to return the multi-layer canopy for nesting and migratory birds, while considering issues with transient camps in the area. Aggressive chemical control of noxious weeds adjacent to all disturbance areas should also be a high priority. These are the most likely places for spread of noxious and invasive plants. These areas should also be seeded soon after the disturbance ceases (generally within 2 weeks any time of the year). Seeding with an inexpensive grass and forb mix should be done any time disturbances occur throughout the project lifecycle to reduce the opportunity for noxious and invasive plants to take over and dominate. This is cheap insurance and will reduce the potential need for chemicals to be used on the site in the future. Habitat improvements are a key goal of the Project and phasing the project's construction will reduce potential impacts to the site's current wildlife population. Phasing the project will limit the amount of area that will be disturbed at any one time. Portions of the site will be left undisturbed during the initial phases of construction to provide habitat. This applies particularly to habitat for migratory song birds. Partners working along the Jordan River Corridor have recommended a phased approach for removal of Russian olives, which serve as habitat for migratory and resident bird species. Russian olive should be left on portions of the site that are not part of the initial phases and riparian plants should be planted into Russian olive stands, where the shade from the existing invasive trees will help with establishment of new forests. As native plants mature, the remainder of the Russian olives can be removed and replaced with the appropriate native species. There will be an ongoing need for maintenance of the site to prevent Russian olives (and other noxious species) from re-establishing in areas where they have been removed. Secondary invasion of hoary cress and phragmites should also be monitored and treated in these areas. The following noxious and invasive weed species have been observed on or adjacent to the Glendale Regional Park: • Hoary cress • Perennial pepperweed • Scotch thistle • Dalmatian toadflax • Poison hemlock • Common reed • Houndstongue • Tamarisk • Russian olive • Russian knapweed • Dyer's woad • Puncturevine The primary objective of noxious weed control is to selectively reduce the cover and abundance of noxious and invasive plants across the site. This work is being accomplished mostly by mechanical and chemical control of herbaceous plants and through physical removal of invasive Russian olive and tamarisk trees. Site management should focus on phasing the removal of these trees over several years and installation of native and desirable plant species to retain the beneficial aspects of the riparian cover, i.e. a multi-story canopy. The main objective of this Plan is to reduce the cover of invasive species over time so that the entire site does not have to be treated at the time of major construction. Removal of invasive trees can be conducted at the same time as crews and volunteers are installing native riparian trees, shrubs, fortis, and grasses in small patches.The installation of new plants will reduce the "temporal loss" of riparian habitat in the area during major construction activity phases. The major challenge with this phase is providing sufficient water to the plants to make sure they become established. Another objective of this Plan is to reduce the number of seeds and propagules of noxious plants such as thistle, whitetop, Russian olive, and puncturevine. The following matrix provides some guidance for treatments and timing for each noxious and invasive weed species found on the Glendale Regional Park or along the Jordan River corridor close to the site. Glendale Regional Park Action Plan Surrma 2022-2023 2022 2023 Status Responsibility 3 c m -a a _ = v ° on s d 7 3 a = c m a ° 0 NIMEMIN Monitor weedy upland areas X X X X Monitor riparian areas X X X X Count planting success I X X in Initial watering of plants X X X X X Irrigation of plants X X X X X X X Fencin and Protecting installed vegetation X X X X X Installation of Habitat Patches X X X X X Seeding of areas adjacent to disturbances X X X X X X X X X X Mow annual weeds and thistles X X X X X X X X X X Field meeting with herbicide applicator X X X X X Herbicide use in upland areas I X X X X X X X X Herbicide use in riparian areas X X X X X X X X Chemical control hoarycress X X X X X I X Chemical control poison hemlock X X I I X X XI I X Chemical control thistle X X I I X X X X I I X X Chemical control phragrites X X X X Chemical control perennial pepperweed X X IN 1110 Bill No removal of trees to protect nesting birds X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Herbivory check on any planted vegetation X X IIIX X ly X Restoration Plants The following species have been selected for seeding or planting in small patches. These species were derived from observations of native riparian habitats by Ty Harrison over the last half- century. Irrigation is needed regularly for successful establishment of these plants. Common Name I Scientific Name RIPARIAN TREES AND SHRUBS Fremont Cottonwood Populus fremontii Box Elder Acre negundo Peachleaf Willow Saliix amigdaloides Black Hawthorn Crataegus douglasi Coyote Willow Salix exigua Woods Rose Rosa woodsii Oakleaf Sumac Rhus aromatics var. trilobata Golden Currant Ribes aureum UPLAND SHRUBS Big Sagebrush Artemisia tridentate var. tridentate Rubber Rabbitbrush Chrysothamnus nauseosus Greasewood Sarcobatus vermiculatus Fourwing Saltbush Atriplex canescens Gardner's Saltbush Atriplex gardneri Recommended Seed Mixes I Species Scientific Name Species Common Name Percent desired cover at maturity Emergent Wetland Mix Typha latifolia Common cattail 40 Scirpus acutis Hardstem or Roundstern bullrush 40 S. americanus American threesquare 10 S. pungens Common threesquare 10 S. maritimus Alkali bullrush 5 Senecio hydrophilus Water groundsel 2 Triglochin sp jArrowgrass 2 Wet Meadow Eleocharis palustris Creeping spikerush 20 Juncus torreyi Torrey rush 20 Carex nebrascensi.s Nebraska sedge 20 C. lanuginosa Wooly sedge 20 Distichlis spicata Inland saltgrass 10 Mesic Meadow Juncus arcticus Wiregrass or Arctic rush 30 Distichlis spicata Inland saltgrass 10 Pascopyrum smithii Western wheatgrass 30 Sporobolus airoides Alkali saccaton 10 Puccinellia nuttalliana Nuttall's alkaligrass 10 C. praegracilis Black creeper sedge 10 Solidago occidentalis Western goldenrod 10 Upland Mix Pascopyrum smithii Western wheatgrass 30 Leymus cl'nereus Great Basin wildrye 20 Distichlis spicata Inland saltgrass 10 Poa secunda (sandbergii) Sandberg bluegrass 10 Festuca ovina 'Covar' Sheep fescue 10 Cleome serrulata Rocky Mountain beeweed 5 Sphaeralcea coccinea Scarlet globernallow 5 Linium lewi.si.J. Lewis blue flax 5 Weed treatment tracking form: OBSERVER LOCATION DATE TREATMENT FOLLOW UP NEEDED WEATHER ACRES DENSITY PHENOLOGY NOTES Appendix D Market Study Glendale MMMMRegional Park NEENEEMERMaste Plan Glendale Regional Park Demographic and Market Study September, 2021 This study assesses and analyzes demographic characteristics ofthe areas surrounding the Glendale Regional Park project site.As part ofthe process,primary and secondary market areas were defined and confirmed with project stakeholders.These market areas served as the geographic focus area ofthe analysis and were compared to demographic trends at the County level.Key questions answered through the analysis include: • What is the primary and secondary market area that the Park could expect to draw visitor from? • What are the demographic and populations trends within the primary and secondary market areas? • What is the population that the Park could be serving? • What does recreational trends data inform regarding potential gaps or opportunities? Primary and Secondary Nbrket Area Primary Nbrket Area The primary market area,depicted in Figure 1,is where 60 to 80 percent of all park users are anticipated to be drawn from and includes users who will frequent the Park on a near weekly basis.The primary market area identified for this analysis lies between Interstate 215 and Interstate 15 and extends south of West South Temple Street and north of West 2900 Street.Neighborhoods that fall in the primary market area include Chesterfield,Western Pacific Addition, Redwood Gardens,Klenkes Addition,Wenco Acres,Albert Place,%aldons Addition,Poplar Grove and Wright Circle. Other parks and public outdoor spaces located in the primary market area include Decker Lake Park,Redwood Nature Area,Redwood Tmiihead Park, 17th South River Park,Weseman Parr Nbdesto Park,91h South River Park,Post Street Tot Lot,Bend-In-The-River,Jordan Park and Peace Gardens,Jordan River Parkway,Poplar Grove Park and Sher,wod Park _8 Scz LaW a W1000N $1.. f i A,q—t �ON s .nir xrrt W 500N E tirtt Ave IN North 1.m n •"`.=w: r ._ E S outh Tern p1.St ,. Salt 4 Lake City. E 4111_.. W 5005 --« b8 E-500$.. W WS WOODS E600 a'. WindianitAo .—;.. . �Vd 005 � E 900 s' E 800 S E S .,. ys«de A a m V 14005 ati forn«a Ava ^to _... %6 j00S E13005 w A __t7008 W2100$ - 3i 1�� '.. � E2100S SoUth Salt E 27005 F � w W 3100S y W 3300 W3500S West Valley city I�yp45 YJ 3 60S E 3000 S� Figure 1: Prirnary 1Nhrket Area.Source:ESR1 Business Analyst Secondary Nhrket Area The secondary market area,illustrated in Figure 2,is where 20 to 40 percent of all park users are anticipated to be drawn from and includes users who treat the Park as a destination,going there for a specific purpose or activities. Salt Lake City was identified as the secondary market area and was analyzed as a buffer zone to encompass a broader reach ofthe region and capture residents who may visit the Park less frequently than those in the primary market area. The area north of 2100 South Freeway within the primary market area lies within the Salt Lake City boundary.As a result,data extracted for the secondary market area also includes data within the section ofthe primary market area north of2100 South Freeway.The primary and secondary markets were compared to Salt Lake County to better understand the relative demographic differences ofthe market area in the context ofthe region. 1 x North SaltLake i.'.. m a Vd 70#S :500 IN 6ell ... 4.`II E'17008 :.. E:2100 3... W 2400 a on on Salt E2P0QS- S W"1 O S c» "+� Lake Magna=, 3500 S R,E3300S .n W n est Valle E 34003 ry u, m o }�� 7 0 W 4100S city Figure 2:Secondary NErketArea.Source ESRI Business Analyst Population and Households Table 1 shows the total population estimates for each area of study in 2010,2021,and 2026 extracted from ESRI Business Analyst.The 2021 total population in the primary market area is 29,525 and the population in the secondary market area is 204,380.Between 2010 and 2021,the population within the primary market area has grown by 4.07 percent while the population in the secondary market area grew by 9.65 percent. Growth within both primary and secondary market areas was less than that ofthe County,which grewby 17.3 percent since 2010.Over the next five years (2021-2026)population in the primary market area is expected to grow by 3.54 percent,reaching a total population of30,571 in 2026.The population in the secondary market area is expected to see slightly higher growth over the next five years,growing by 8.65 percent to reach a total population of222,029 in 2026. Population Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT 2010 Tota I Population 28,369 186,399 1,029,655 2021 Total Population 29,525 204,380 1,207,807 2026 Total Population 30,571 222,029 1298,444 Table 1.Total Population Estimates.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Total household estimates,household size,and family statistics are depicted in Table 2.Between 2010 and 2021 households in the primary market area have grown by 3.7 percent,increasing from 7,982 to 8,277.The growth in households in the primary market area is less than that ofthe secondary market area(11.68 percent)and that of Salt Lake County(17.1 percent).Household growth between 2021 and 2026 is expected to slow to 3.2 percent in the primary market area,9.51 percent in the secondary market area and 7.5 percent in Salt Lake County.In 2026 there is projected to be 8,542 total households in the primary market area and 91,106 households in the secondary market area. Current average household size in the primary market area(3.54 persons)is larger than that in the secondary market area(2.4 persons)and that of Salt Lake County(2.97 persons).This is consistent with a higher number of family household within the primary market area(70.63 percent)than in both the secondary market area(49.47 percent)and Page 2 in Salt Lake County(69.66 percent).Of the families within each area of study,average family sizes are larger in the primary market area(4.1 persons)than the secondary market area(3.27 persons)and Salt Lake County(3.55 persons).The primary market area's high concentration of families has severalimpfications the future of Glendale Regional Park,including ensuring that park programming,both physical and event,is appropriate for children of varying ages. Households&Families Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,U17 Total Households 2010 Total Households 7,982 74,493 342,622 2021 Total Households 8,277 83,197 401,195 2026 Total Households 8,542 91,106 431,279 Household Size 2021 gage Household Sim 3.54 2.40 2.97 Families 2021 Total FamilyHouseholds 5,846 41,157 279,462 2021 Total FamilyHouseholds(%) 70.63% 49.47% 69.66% 2021 Aerage FamilySize 4.10 3.27 3.55 Table 2.Household and Family Estimates.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Age The 2021 median age and the distribution of ages for the prirnary market area,secondar market area,and Salt Lake County is depicted in Table 3.The median age in the primary market area is 29,slightly younger than that ofthe secondary market area(33)and that of Salt Lake County(33).Adian ages in 2026 are expected to be roughly the same as 2021 across all areas of study.The primary market area is significantly younger than the secondary market area and Salt Lake County,with residents 19 and under comprising 36.52 percent ofthe population.The proportion of the total population that is under 19 in the secondary market area is 21.77 percent,which is lower than the primary market area and Salt Lake County(27.85 percent).The largest age group in the primary market area is between 0 and 9,which consists of 19.78 percent ofthe total population,followed by age groups between 10 and 19 and between 30 and 39,which consist of 16.74 percent and 16.33 percent ofthe population,respectively.The high ratio ofchildren in the primary market area indicates a high concentration of families in the region.The largest age cohort in the secondary market area is between 20 and 29,indicating that there is an overall younger demographic in this region that may enter family formation years (30-39)within the next decade. Total Population Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,Ur 0-9 19.78% 12.93% 16.17% 10-19 16.74% 11.91% 14.40% 20-29 15.29% 19.05% 14.45% 30-39 16.33% 17.60% 16.72% 40-49 11.40% 11.63% 12.47% 50-59 8.81% 9.80% 9.72% 60-69 8.84% 8.60% 70-79 80+ Median Age 28.9 33.1 32.9 Table 3.Population by Age Group.Source:ESRl Business Analyst. I-busehold Income and Wealth The 2021 median household income,projected median household income growth,and concentration of specific household income brackets are shown in Table 4.The 2021 median household income in the primary market area is $50,508,which is less than that ofthe secondary market area($63,364)and that of Salt Lake County($80,897).The primary market area is also expected to see less growth in median household income(12.18 percent)than in the secondary market area(19.14 percent)and Salt Lake County(13.59 percent)bet\wen 2021 and 2026.Table 5 delineates the median disposable income and the percent ofthe total households in each area of study corresponding to specific disposable income ranges as of2021.The median disposable income in the primary market area is Page 3 $42,262,which less than that ofthe secondary market area($52,690)and that of Salt Lake County($63,344).Income distributions for both median and disposable income levels are skewed towards lower income levels in the primary market area while those in the secondary market area and Salt Lake County form a more normal distribution around the median income level.This indicates that income levels are lower in the primary market area than the secondary market area or the county.Given this distinction,the Park will better suit the primary market through low or no cost activities for both adults and children.There is a need for the implementation ofprogramnillg such as free fitness classes or facilities that can supplement recreational demands ofthe conunllnity for little to no cost.Ifconcessions are implemented,then they should be priced appropriately. 2021 Household Income Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,Ur Median Household Income $50,508 $63,364 $80,897 2021 to 2026 Median Household Income Growth 12.18% 19.14% 13.59% $200,000 or greater 8.49% $150,000-$199,999 low 10.09% $100,0004149,999 9.70% 15.94% 20.91% $75,000499,999 15.05% 12.51% 1492% $50,000474,999 20.67% 16.500/. 17.58% $35,000-$49,999 15.43% 11.11% 9.96% $25,000-$34,999 11.33% $15,000-$24,999 11.31% Less than$15,000 11.271/o 12.29% Table 4.Household Income Concentrations.Source:ESRI Business Analyst 2021 Disposable Income Primary Market Area SecondaryNh ket Area Salt Lake County,Ur Median Disposable Income $42,262 $52,690 $63,344 $200,000 or greater $150,000-$199,999 NEENEM NN $100,000-$149,999 13.30% 18.24% $75,000-$99,999 8.13% 11.51% 15.04% $50,000-$74,999 24.80% 20.00% 22.57% $35,000449,999 18A6% 14.23% 14.04% $25,000-$34,999 12.50% 1 9100/0 7.37% $15,000-$24,999 13.64% 9.88% 6.82% Less than$15,000 13.27% 13.64% 1 7.44% Table 5.Disposable Income Concentrations.Source:ESRIBasiness Analyst Depicted in Table 5 is the Wealth Index for the primary market area,secondary market area,and Salt Lake County. The Wealth Index is a metric used to compare overall wealth ofcommunities to the national level Esri Business Analyst measures wealth by compiling a variety ofinetries that contribute to affluence,including income,average net worth,and material possessions and resources.The index compares the wealth calculated for selected areas to the average national wealth levels.Wealth indexes above 100 indicate wealth levels above the national average,while those below 100 indicate wealth levels below the national average.The wealth index in the primary market area is 47, indicating that the area has lower amounts ofwealth when compared to the national average.The secondary market area has a wealth index of 85,which is slightly lower than the national average,while Salt Lake County has a wealth index of 105,which is higher than the national average. This indicates that in terms of income and personal assets,the primary market area holds the lowest level ofwealth out ofthe three areas studied.Given the lowwealth index ofthe primary market area,it is likely that the majority ofthe population in this region do not have adequate resources to pay for,or use,the same recreational facilities as those ofa higher wealth index community.For this reason,programs should not be priced at a level suitable to the other areas of study,instead low cost or free programs should be offered so that those with lower incomes have access to desired recreational facilities and programs. wealth Index I Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,ITT 2021 wealth Index 1 47 1 85 105 Table 5.wealth Index.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Page 4 1-busing Table 6 illustrates the composition ofhousing units that are either renter or owner occupied as of2021.Currently there are 8,277 occupied housing units in the primary market area,ofwhich 4,560(55.09 percent)are owner occupied and 3,717(44.91 percent)are renter occupied.Compared to the primary market area,there is a higher concentration of renter occupied units in the secondary market area(54.08 percent)and a smaller concentration ofrenter occupied units in Salt Lake County(33.78 percent).Table 7 depicts the concentration ofhousing type and number ofunits in the housing structure within each area of study as of2019. The majority ofhousing units in all areas of study are single unit detached structures.Unlike the that ofthe primary market area and Salt Lake County,the second largest concentration ofhousing types,malting up 14.05 percent oftotal housing in the secondary market area,consists of buildings that hold 50 or more units. Tenure 2021 Primary Market Area Secondary Nbrket Area Salt Lake County,UP Total Occupied 8,277 83,197 401,195 Owner Occupied Housing Units 4,560 38,203 265,687 Renter Occupied Housing Units 3,717 44,994 135,508 20210wner Occupied Housing Units(%) 55.09% 45.92% 66.22% 2021 Renter Occupied Housing Units(%) 44.91% 54.08% 33.78% Table 6.Tenure of occupied housing.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. 2019 Housing Type(Percent) Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,Ur 1 Detached Unit inStructure 60.42% 46.42% 62.62% 1 Atached Unit in Structure 5.55% 3.24% 7.19% 2 Units in Structure 7.16% 6.57% 2.94% 3 or 4 Units in Structure 5.19% 6.62% 3.91% 5 to 9 Units in Structure 4.35% 5.06% 4.23% 10 to 19 Units in Structure 8.10% 6.90% 5.81% 20 to 49 Units in Structure 4.01% 9.91% 5.31% 50 or More Units in Structure 1.59% 14.05% 5.99% Housing:Mobile Homes 3.63% 0.95% 1.94% Housing:Boat/RV/Van/etc. 0.00% 0.28% 0.07% Table 7.Tenure ofoccupied housing.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Table 8 delineates the proportion of all housing units as of2019 by year built.The median year built ofhousing units within the primary market area is 1968,which is newer than the median home age in the secondary market and older than that of Salt Lake County. The majority ofhousing units in the primary market(16.89 percent)were built between 1950 and 1959 while the majority ofthe households within the secondary market(29.08 percent)were built in 1939 or earlier. Salt Lake County holds a higher concentration ofbuildings built in 1970 or later. Housing Unit Development Year Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area4,1 ty,Ur Median Year Structure was Built 1968 1959 2014 or later 2010-2013 2000-2009 10.93% 6.65% 1990-1999 12.57% 7.36% . 1980-1989 10.39% 7.69% 12.95% 1970-1979 13.04% 12.0696 18.90% 1960-1969 12.96% 9.97% 8.98% 1950-1959 16.89% 13.22% 8.88% 1940-1949 8.15% 8.70% 1939 or Earl ier 14.36% 29.08% 8.01% Table 8.Tenure of occupied housing.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Illustrated in Table 9,the median contract rent in the primary market area is $900,which is greater than that ofthe secondary market area($889),and less than that of Sah Lake County($993).Nbnd*ownership costs as of2019 for households that pay a mortgage are depicted in Table 10.Ofthe households with a mortgage,most ownership costs typically he within 10 to 30 percent ofhousehold income. Ownership costs that exceed 50 percent ofhousehold income within the primary market area consist of 8.38 percent of total households with a mortgage,which is greater than that Page 5 ofthe secondary market area(5.56 percent)and that of Salt Lake County(5.75 percent). This indicates that the primary market area is faced with higher housing cost burdens than other areas.Glendale Park can assist households in the primary market area by offering low cost or free programming,thereby eliminating,or reducing recreation related expenses. Contract Rent Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,Ur 2019 Median Contract Rent $900 $889 $993 Table 9.Nkdian Contract Rent.Source:ESR1Business Analyst_ 2019 Nbnthly Ownership Costs ofHouseholds with a Nbrtgage(Percent) Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,Ur NbnthlyOwnerCosts<10%ofHHIncome 4.89% 6.34% 5.32% Nbnthly0wnerCosts 10-14.9%ofHHIncome 11.40% 12.61% 12.69% NbnthlyOmcrCosts 15-19.9%ofHHlncome 11.51% 14.57% 16.18% NbnthlyOwner Costs 20-249%ofHHIncome I1.81% 11.54% 12.39% NbnthlyOwnerCosts 25-29.9%ofHH Income 9.42% 6.56% 8.49% Nbnthly0wnerCosts 30-34.9%ofHHlncome 4.48% 4.27% 4.87% NbnthlyOwnerCosts 35-39.9%ofHHIncome 6.11% 3.92% 3.34% NbnthlyOwnerCosts 40-49.9%ofHH Income 3.470/. NbnthlyOwnerCosts 50+%ofHHlncome Nbnthly0wnerCosts%ofHHJoe Not Computed Table 10.Housing Costs for Households Owning Property.Source:ESRI Bus iness Analyst. Table 11 displays the 2021 and 2026 median home values for the areas studied.The 2021 median home value in the primary market area is $282,245,which is 34 percent less than that ofthe secondary market area and 30.6 percent less than that of Salt Lake County.Nbdian home values are expected to growby 53 percent in the primary market area,30 percent in the secondary market area and 25 percent in Salt Lake County. Median Home Values Primary Market Area Secondary Nlarket Area Salt Lake County,UT 2021 Median Home Value $282,245 $427,693 $406,810 2026 Median Home Value $431,591 $554,870 $509,442 Table 11.NtdianHome Values.Source:ESR1Business Analyst. Race&Ethnicity The distribution oft-ace and ethnicity within the selected areas of study are delineated in Table 12. The highest concentration ofrace within the primary market area is white,consisting of48.2 percent ofthe population.The fEspanic population makes up 53.44 percent ofthe primary market area population,24.3 percent ofthe secondary market area population and 18.36 percent ofthe Salt Lake County population. Race(2021) Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,Ur White Population 48.20% 70.58% 78.16% B1ackAfican American Population 4.64% 3.67% 2.06% American Indian/Alaska Native Population 1.86% 1.35% 0.93% Asian Population 4.92% 6.05% 4.51% Pacific Islander Population 6.34% 2.14% 1.61% Other Race Population 28.45% 11.86% 8.97% Population ofTwo or More Races 5.59% 4.36% 3.76% Ethnicity(2021) Hspanic Population 53.44% 24.30% 18.36% Non-Hispanic Population 46.56% 75.70% 81.64% Table 12.Race Concentrations.Source:ESRI Business Analyst.Hispanic and'Ahite population numbers are not mutually exclusive. Spending Habits Entertainment and recreational spending in 2021 is depicted in Table 13. Spending per household on entertainment and recreation is approximately$2,084,which is 33.57 percent less than that ofthe secondary market area($3,137) and 40.34 percent less than that of Salt Lake County($3,493).The primary market area spends 39.65 percent less on membership fees for social,recreational and health clubs than the secondary market area and 46.57 percent less on Page 6 those services than Salt Lake County.Given the lower spending habits ofindividuals within the primary market area on entertainment and recreation,there is an implied lower willingness to pay for this category ofproducts and services.As a result,facilities and programs within the Glendale Regional Park will likely see higher use ifprogramnnuig prices are reduced or eliminated Household Expenditures(2021) Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,Ur Entertainment/Recreation $2,084 $3,137 $3,493 Fees for Participant Sports Excluding Trips $72 $111 $134 Fees for Recreational Lessons $87 $131 $160 Sports/Rec/Exercise Equipment $127 $182 $202 Ntrubership Fees for Social/Recreation/Health Clubs 1 $148 1 $246 1 $278 Table 13.Household Expenditures.Source:ESRI Business Analyst.Per household spending data was calculated from dividing aggregate spending values by the total number ofhouseholds. Conclusion With a population of29,525 in the primary market area and 204,380 in the secondary market area,Glendale Regional Park services an urban community which requires outdoor space and recreational opportunities for all residents.The population in the surrounding region is also growing at a rapid rate,which furthers the need for additional park and recreation opportunities. Many ofthe households within the primary market are families with an average family size that is greater than the surrounding regions.Late to the large family demographic,there is likely a desire for safe public spaces with a variety ofprograms that can accommodate both the demands of children and adults.As 19.78 percent ofthe population in the primary market area is children,facilities in the park should tailor to the types of activities that youth desire. Since both the median household income and median disposable income within the primary market area is lower than that of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County,the primary market maybe less capable of spending on recreation as other areas ofhigher affluence.Housing costs also present a larger financial burden for the primary market than other areas of study.For this reason,recreational programs in the park should be offered free of charge or at low or no-cost rates to accommodate the primary market's population,and to provide outdoor opportunities for those that may not have access to those opportunities elsewhere. Page 7 EXHIBIT D Public Comments Received&Letters of Support ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor Public Comments, meeting minutes and responses can be found in the Planning Commission staff Deport of November 9, 2022 and in the Plannino- Commission IVMeetino Minutes of November 9. 2021 Please see below for relevant letters of support, which have also been sent directly to the Planning Commission and City Council. PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT www.slc.gov/parks/ 1965 W 500 S PHONE 801-972-7800 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104 FAX 801-972-7847 November 4, 2022 Mayor Erin Mendenhall Salt Lake City Council 451 S. State Street Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SUBJECT: PNUT Letter of Support for the Glendale Regional Park Master Plan Mayor Erin Mendenhall and City Council Members, Please allow this letter to serve as a resounding endorsement for the adoption of the Glendale Regional Park Master Plan.As population growth along the Wasatch Front continues to accelerate, the importance of equitable investment in quality, community-integrated public spaces like this is vital to quality of life for all community members. We applaud the successful community engagement efforts and the proactive adjustments based on that engagement. Key master plan elements we strongly support include creating community gathering and event spaces, providing play places for all abilities users, creating places to enjoy water within the park and in the Jordan River, and developing places to engage in active movement supported by the landscape. The adoption and implementation of this plan will benefit the community by: • Providing an iconic neighborhood park that celebrates and preserves community, culture, and diversity. It will also be a regional destination connecting to the Jordan River and Salt Lake City's park network. • Prioritizing accessible nature and recreation will improve quality of life for current and future generations of west side residents. • Multifaceted, successful outreach efforts and the implementation of community feedback encourages trust and connection among stakeholders and community entities. • Adoption of the Master Plan sets the stage for funding approvals for current and future capital improvements connected to the Glendale Regional Park community We urge Mayor Mendenhall, City Council Members, and parks staff to continue engagement and implementation of Transportation Advisory Board's (TAB) recommendations as well, such as: • Continued assessment of transportation needs including access to the park by families, bicyclists, community members. • Strong consideration to safety structures along 1700 South like pedestrian activated stop signs, traffic calming measures, on-street and off-street parking options, and any other opportunity to negate harm. • Park planners must coordinate with UTA on providing improved transit services to the park. This is a plan that will not sit on a shelf. We expect active, established programming partnerships and continued community engagement to facilitate consistent utilization of the space at every phase of this multi-year project. We look forward to this park serving our community toward a healthy, livable and equitable future. Yours sincerely, �2A21ZyLCL C�aryn.¢rtbd2 Brianna Binnebose, Interim Chair Ginger Cannon Samantha Finch Jenny Hewson Phil Carroll CJ Whittaker Melanie Pehrson-Noyce Clayton Scrivner Aaron Wiley Meridith Benally TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD Salt Lake City Transportation Division Office-349 South Zoo East, Suite 150 - P.O. Box 145502 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5502 October 28, 2022 Salt Lake City Planning Commission&Salt Lake City Council RE: Letter of Support— Glendale Regional Park Master Plan On behalf of the Salt Lake City Transportation Advisory Board, I write in support of Salt Lake City's initiative to construct a regional park in the location of the old Raging Waters site. Detailed plans of the proposed park were presented to the Transportation Advisory Board at their October meeting with a great deal of discussion and unquestionable support and enthusiasm, including the proposed three crosswalks along 1700 South. The discussion stressed that planners should work with the SLC Transportation Division to ensure the safety of all visitors and users. Issues to be addressed regarding 1700 South included access by family bicyclists, pedestrian activated stop signs at crosswalks,traffic calming to reduce speed and the issue of on-street parking in case there are not sufficient off-street stalls. The Transportation Division is aware of the proposed plan and already has a project manager assigned to look at 1700 South and has allocated some funds to start a low-cost project to address some these concerns. The park planners should also coordinate with UTA on providing transit service to the park.As the project progresses,the Transportation Advisory Board will provide comments and feedback to ensure that these issues and concerns are addressed. This park would provide a place to recreate for residents of the Glendale community, as well as other westside neighborhoods. It will be constructed in a location that has long been an eyesore for the community,which will improve the neighborhood quality and allow for more access to healthy recreation.The current plans show that the regional park can be accessed using many modes of transportations.This allows for all types of users to be able to enjoy the amenities that this park would provide. The Transportation Advisory Board supports the recommendations in the Glendale Regional Park Master Plan with commitment to addressing the safety issues and concerns presented with the development of this new park. This plan is an opportunity to provide a more equitable distribution of recreation to the residents of Salt Lake City. Sincerely, Greg Sanchez, Chair Transportation Advisory Board (Insert Agenda Item# Here) ,,,..��''� •••••..,,, MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY r tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 TO: City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards Budget Analysts DATE: March 7,2023 MMMIMMM RE: Budget Amendment Number Five FY2023 MOTION 1—CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT SINGLE ITEM I move that the Council continue the public hearing and adopt an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2023 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document only for item E-1 as shown on the motion sheet. Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the individual items being approved below; they are listed for reference.Also, the continued public hearing will have new advertising. The budget amendment remains open. The Council will consider other items at a future date. E-1:Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance Program Additional Resources($2 Million Grant Fund) - $2 Million for Salt Lake City tenant rental assistance through the Utah Rent Relief Program CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.FOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 i COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ,, f' CITY COUNCIL Of SALT LAKE CITY 111 tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 tow s•''' TO: City Council Members Project Timeline: Set Date: February ,2023 FROM: Ben Luedtke Sylvia Richards S Y i Briefing: March 7, 2023023 Budget and Policy Analysts Public Hearing:March 7,2023 2nd Briefing:TBD DATE: March 7,2023 Potential Action:March 21, 2023 RE: Budget Amendment Number Five FY2023 Budget Amendment Number Five includes 24 proposed amendments, $33,321,895 of expenditures of which $6,240,349 is from Fund Balance,requested changes to six funds. If all the items are adopted as proposed,then Fund Balance would be 22.9%which is $40,507,938 above the 13%minimum target. Two items are urgent with straw poll requests: Item A-5 $2.4 million additional funding for the radios upgrade, (was expected and builds on funding in the Sales Tax Bond)and Item A-3,an increase in the cost for fiber upgrades to City facilities to over$250,000 (unexpected and urgent because it needs to be done during a street reconstruction project).As noted in the staff report,the Administration is requesting straw polls for both items. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 COUNCIL.SLCCOV.COM L P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 Council Request: Tracking New Ongoing General Fund Costs Approved in Midyear Budget Amendments Council staff has provided the following list of new ongoing costs to the General Fund.Many of these are new FTE's approved during this fiscal year's budget amendments,noting that each new FTE increases the City's annual budget if positions are added to the staffing document. Budget Estimated Cost Amendment Item Increase to Next New City F rEs Notes Annual Budget Homeless Shelter Cities 13 new FTEs which Admin expects to apply for grant funding Mitigation Grant Award includes: annually to cover these costs.General Fund #1 $2.2 Million 12 police officers and would not need to cover costs if the State grant is one business and awarded to the City to fully cover the costs. community liaison Utah League of Cities N/A Total annual membership cost is$221,563 #3 and Town Membership $38,000 Cost Increase Two Contract Two new FTEs Development $207,800 Specialists in Finance Senior Project Manager One new I TE The $85 Million Parks Bond could pay for this in Public Services $168,000 FI'E in future fiscal years.The General Fund fronted the cost in FY2023.The position sunsets with the bond funding. Two Planners in Public Two new FTEs The$85 Million Parks Bond could pay for these Lands F rEs in future fiscal years.The General Fund $�41'44o fronted the cost in FY2023.The positions sunset #4 with the bond funding. Volunteers of America N/A Separate from VOA's countywide outreach team. (VOA)Salt Lake City $2�74,000 Specific Outreach Team Four existing VOA workers: Two case managers and two coordinators Police Substation on N/A North Temple and Downtown Central $130,000 Precinct Leases and Utilities 3 of the new FTEs sunset with the GO Bond TOTALS $39259,240 18 funding,and some are covered with potential fiuture state grant awards Disclaimer:For the chart above,staff didn't include a couple Youth&Family and Police Department multi-year grants since they would not create cost increases for the next annual budget. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 COUNCIL.SLCCOV.COM L P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 REVISED TRANSMITTAL AND REVISED REVENUE AND FUND BALANCE CHARTS Amended Variance Favorable Revenue FY22-FY23 Annual Budget -23Amended Budget Revised Forecast (unfavorable) Property Taxes 125,012,927 125,012,927 125,012,927 - Sale and Use Taxes 105,050,018 105,050,018 10 ,269,378 3,219,360 Franchise Taxes 11,657,128 11,657,128 11,640,553 (16,575) Paynomt in Lien of Taxes 1,638,222 1,638,222 1,638,222 - TotalTaxes 243,3SB,295 243,3S8,29S 246,S61,080 3,202,795 Licenses and Permits 40,736,114 40,736,114 41,114,687 378,S73 Intergovernmental Revenue 4,644, 22 4,6 ,622 4,722,377 77,755 Interest Income 2,071,154 2,071,154 4,771,154 2,700,000 Fines 3,765,174 3,7 5,174 3,817,666 52,492 Parking Meter Collections 2,635,475 2,635,475 2,635,475 - Char es,Fees,and Rentals 4,432,794 4,432,794 4,887,307 454,513 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,439,710 3,438,710 3,857,347 418,637 1 mart und Reimbursement 24,431,717 24,431,717 24,422,422 (9,295) Transfers 28,821,993 34, 21,993 34,829,993 (92,000 Total W/O Special Tax 3S8,336, 371,619,SO8 7,183,460 Additional Sales Tax(1/2%) 44,364,490 44,364,490 45,614,490 1,250,000, Total General Fund — i 402,700,538 408,8W,S38 417,233,998 1 9,433,4601 Revenue for FY2023 Budget Adjustments According to the Administration,the current projections for fiscal year 2023 projections continue to be positive.Actual sales tax revenue received is currently projected to exceed budget by$3.2 million while the sales tax associated with Funding Our Future is projected to exceed budget by$1.25 million. Building permits continue to stay strong projecting to be over budget by $378,573• Charges and services is projecting to be over budget because of strong numbers from police service revenues, while miscellaneous revenue shows an increase over budget due to an increase in fuel reimbursement costs.The City is also projecting a large surplus due to the rising interest rates. Staff Note Clarification: Other Police Services Revenue includes contractual agreements for the following:Jordan River Patrol,Task force UHP Crosswalk and Speed control,South Salt Lake,North Salt Lake.The agreement reimburses overtime for police officers who assist in the areas.There is an offsetting PD overtime expenditure. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 COUNCIL.SLCCOV.COM L P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 Fund Balance The Administration's chart below shows the current General Fund Balance figures. Beginning Fund Balance Budgeted Change in Fund Balance Prior Year Encumbrances Estimated Beginning Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance Percent Year End CAER Adjustments Revenue Changes Expense Changes(crepaids,Resavable,Etc.) Fund Balance w/CAER Changes Final Fund Balance Percent Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment BA#1 Expense Adjustment BA#2 Revenue Adjustment BA#2 Expense Adjustment BA#3 Revenue Adjustment BA#3 Expense Adjustment BA#4 Revenue Adjustment BA#4 Expense Adjustment BA#5 Revenue Adjustment BA#5 Expense Adjustment BA#6 Revenue Adjustment BA#6 Expense Adjustment BA#7 Revenue Adjustment BA#7 Expense Adjustment Change in Revenue Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase Adjusted Fund Balance Adjusted Fund Balance Percent Proposed/Adopted Revenue CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 Impact Fees Update The Administration's transmittal does not provide an updated summary of impact fee tracking.The information from Budget Amendment No. 5 is copied below and is current as of 12/28/22.As a result,the City is on-track with impact fee budgeting to have no refunds during all of FY2023 and FY2024.The Administration reports work is nearing completion to update the fire and parks sections of the impact fee plan.The transportation section was updated in October 202o. Eligible projects for police impact fees are being identified.Note that the below balances were updated based on the Council's Capital Improvement Program(CIP)project funding decisions. Type « Unallocated Cash Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring Available to Spend Impact Fees Fire $1,479,222 More than a year away - Parks $12,150,505 More than a year away - Police $989,579 More than a year away - Transportation $4,182,237 More than a year away - Note:Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract Section A: New Items (Note: to expedite the processing of this staff report,staff has included the Administration's descriptions from the transmittal for some of these items) A-1: Rapid Intervention Team Trailer($25,000 from General Fund Balance to the Fleet Fund) The Administration is requesting one-time funding to purchase a second outfitted trailer for the Rapid Intervention Team.The additional trailer is expected to enable the team to spend less time waiting in line at the landfill by the team taking full trailer loads to the landfill when wait times are shorter. A-2: City Hall Earthquake Repairs($2.65 Million from General Fund Balance to the CIP Fund) These funds would be in addition to$9.2 million previously approved by the Council to repair damage from the 5.7 magnitude earthquake in March 2020. If approved as requested,then the project is expected to be fully funded.All of the expenses are expected to be reimbursed by insurance.The true cost would not be known until the project goes out to bid and receives proposals.The funding also includes ancillary costs such as protection of artworks, temporary office moves,and consultants. Repairs could take a year to be completed from the date of selecting a contractor bid. The Engineering Division has worked with the City's property insurance company(FM Global)on the full extent of needed repairs and associated cost estimates.Attachment 1 to the transmittal includes a breakout of these expenses. Note that the cost of inflation experienced since the earthquake will be covered by insurance. A-3: Fiber Conduit to Improve Connections between City Facilities as part of the 200 South Reconstruction Project($242,285 from the IMS Fund) The project would improve connections between City facilities downtown and on the Westside including the Airport, Pioneer Park,and multiple offices,and increase capacity for future needs.The Council approved$150,000 in the annual budget of which$1oo,000 is continuing the City Connect program and the remaining$50,000 is going to the fiber conduit improvements.There are potential benefits such as cost savings and reduced disruption to the neighborhood by including this project in the reconstruction of 200 South when underground utilities are more easily accessible to upgrade. ➢ The Administration has requested a straw poll for this item to avoid an upcoming price increase and to fit the project within the reconstruction schedule. A-4:Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal A-5: Public Safety Radio Replacements Cost Increases($2.4 Million from the IMS Fund) These are in addition to the$3.7 million from the IMS Fund approved as part of FY2023 CIP.The$6.1 million is for public safety handheld and mobile radio replacements,control stations,some special accessories for certain work CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 COUNCIL.SLCCOV.COM L P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 groups,removal of the old and installation of new equipment. IMS reports another$2 million is anticipated to be needed for similar replacements of non-public safety radios.Enterprise funds like the Airport and Public Utilities are budgeting to cover their radio equipment replacements. The Council separately funded$7.5 million for radio towers and related infrastructure in the 2022 sales tax revenue bond approved in Budget Amendment#4 last December. ➢ The Administration has requested a straw poll for this item to avoid a price increase later in March. A-6: Consulting to Create Enterprise Bill System Replacement for Public Utilities Billing System (PUBS) ($250,000 from the IMS Fund) PUBS was developed and expanded by IMS over the past two decades.The system is reaching end of life and needs to be replaced. Some General Fund departments use the system like Sustainability and Community and Neighborhoods in addition to Public Utilities(which is an enterprise fund).This funding is to hire a consultant evaluating the City's needs and recommending options to replace PUBS.Microsoft support for the current system is expected to end as soon as July 2024. A-7: Lindsey Gardens CIP Project Rescope($459,36o in the CIP Fund) The Public Lands Department is requesting a rescope of remaining funds to complete a reduced scope of work in response to cost increases.The primary scope change is renovating the concession stand instead of a full rebuild at a new location with new utility lines.The Department evaluated rebuilding a smaller and simpler concession stand at the current location but inflation resulted in cost estimates even higher than the original scope.The Avenues Baseball League previously donated$1o,000 towards the project. The revised scope of work includes the following items in order of priority.The rescope may not be enough to fully fund all items.The Department would construct these items as far as the funding allows. - Concession stand renovation - Pedestrian path to middle field - Batting cage renovation - Covering dugouts with shade canopies - Trail from middle field to lower field The Council approved$557,000 in FY2019 and FY2020 CIP for improvements to Lindsey Gardens baseball fields and pedestrian access. $97,640 was spent on design fees and engineering.The remaining balance would be rescoped. The following note was provided by the league President in support of the rescope request: This note is to confirm that the Board of Directors of the Avenues Baseball League(ABL)has been informed of and approved the changes to the scope of work at Lindsey Gardens.As president of the league,I have been involved with you,Dat,Preston,and others to change the scope of work and establish new priorities given the anticipated cost overruns after getting the bids for the original scope of work.I have communicated the revised scope of work and the priority of the projects to the ABL board. The board agrees with the priorities that we have discussed and is eager to get on with the project. Bart Cocke President,Avenues Baseball League A-8:Anonymous Donation for the Avenues City Cemetery($1 Million Donation) This item would recognize an anonymous donation to the City for cemetery maintenance and improvements. A-9: One-time Retention Bonuses and Ongoing Hiring Bonuses for Police Officers($4.3 Million from ARPA and$1,201,976 from General Fund Balance) The Police Department estimates three to seven years to reach full staffing based on current hiring and retention rates.This item would fund a new bonus program to incentivize longer retention of officers and faster hiring of new Page 16 officers.The bonus program is intended to stabilize staffing and help the Department reach full staffing within two years.Note that there are many unknowns outside the City's control when projecting when the Police Department could reach full staffing such as the number of qualified candidates applying,the state of the Wasatch Front metropolitan and national economies,officers on leave,crime rates,etc. The Police Department is seeking funding to provide one-time retention bonuses to existing police officers.The retention bonus would be $5,000 for officers who agree to continue employment for one-year or$8,00o for a two year commitment.The retention bonuses would be staggered by timing them to an employee's hiring date anniversary.Approximately$1 million would be needed in the next annual budget to continue the bonus program because of the design to stagger bonuses based on hiring date anniversaries. Retention bonuses would be paid to all existing sworn officers. The Department is also seeking funding to provide ongoing hiring bonuses of$10,00o for lateral officers with a one year commitment and$5,000 for self-sponsored candidates of a qualifying POST-certified police academy.The self- sponsored candidates would still need to complete additional training specifically required by the Department. Hiring bonuses would require a one-year commitment to continue employment with the Department. If an officer leaves before their commitment period is completed,then a prorated amount of the bonus would need to be repaid.Employment separations for any reasons have occurred at all staffing levels.There does not appear to be a higher rate of vacancies at certain years of services or ranks. Funding for the bonuses includes pensionable costs that the Utah Retirement System requires municipalities contribute to public safety officers'retirement accounts.For example,the$10,00o hiring bonus for a lateral officer also requires a$4,68o pension contribution for a total one-year cost to the City of$14,680. The Department reports there are currently 34 police officer vacancies and 26 civilian vacancies.At full staffing there would be 582 sworn officers and 148 civilian staff.The Department provided the below chart showing police officer separations over the past five years.It shows elevated separations from June 2020 to August 2021 and then a return to the five year trend in the past 18 months. Separations 60 Month Trendlioe Mar 2018 to Feb 2023 20 1s 16 14 v 12 n 10 8 6 .. . ..... .. ...... ..... .......... ? .. ... .... .... .. .. 4 0 x 00x a c a c, c c c o 0 0 0 0 o H H N N n N N m 2 2v If this item is approved,then the City's remaining ARPA funds would be$21,269,039.The City used over$31 million from ARPA for General Fund revenue loss in the last two annual budgets.The next annual budget for FY2024 is also expected to be eligible for$10 million or more revenue loss using ARPA. Other ongoing ARPA eligible expenses previously discussed by the Council that could be in the next annual budget are $792,195 for park rangers salary restoration and$252,150 for Grant Administrator and Economic Development FTEs.The Grant Administrator would be eligible for$207,167 in FY2025—FY2026.If ARPA funded all these items,then the remaining balance of ARPA would be$10,017,527.There may also be ARPA funds budgeted in prior years that were not spent and could be recaptured for new uses. (See policy question below). Page 17 Policy Questions: ➢ Larger Bonus and Shorter Commitment for Lateral Officers than Current Officers—The Council may wish to ask the Administration why lateral officers would be required to make a shorter commitment of one-year while receiving a larger bonus of$io,000 compared to the retention bonus for existing officers which is $5,000 for a one-year commitment or$8,00o for a two-year commitment. ➢ Lateral Officer Retention and Resignation—Some Council Members asked are laterals more likely to stay in the department longer than new hires?And how long do laterals stay in the department?The Council may wish to ask the Administration to research these questions.At the time of publishing this staff report an answer was not readily available. ➢ Status of City ARPA Funds—The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration,or schedule a future briefing about,the City's remaining ARPA funds,needs in the next annual budget,and how much,if any, ARPA appropriations from past fiscal years were unused and available for recapture.The U.S.Treasury set a deadline of December 31, 2024 for ARPA funds to be committed(such as budgeted and under a contract), and to be fully spent by the end of 2026. A-io: Real Property Purchase($825,000 from General Fund Balance to the CIP Fund) The item would facilitate acquisition of real property. Per state law this is eligible to be discussed in a closed session. Discussions are ongoing and the Council may hold additional deliberations before considering whether to approve this funding. A-ii: Study to Create Downtown Main Street Pedestrian Mall Additional Funding($ioo,000 from General Fund Balance) In the FY2023 annual budget,the Council approved$150,000 from the RDA Central Business District project area for a study to create a pedestrian mall on Main Street between South Temple and 400 South.The Economic Development Department is requesting additional funding based on the final scope of work.Note that this is separate from actual implementation of the"open streets"concept.The study will look at options to close the street permanently or partially including potentially based on seasons,day of the week,and time of day. The scope of work includes examining the current street conditions,creating planning and design recommendations(including emergency vehicle access,maintenance,utilities access,accessibility considerations, operations and maintenance needs,landscaping,and drainage,etc.),visualizing concept designs,public outreach, and calculating a cost analysis for each future phase of the project. The Department indicates that they anticipate selecting the contractor in the late spring,with deliverables identified in the fail of 2023. Policy Questions: ➢ Scope of Work—The Council may wish to discuss whether the scope of work meets the Council's goals for the study. ➢ 2023 Activation and Programming on Main Street Downtown—The Council approved funding the last few years to partially close Main Street from South Temple to 400 South on weekends between Memorial Day and Labor Day.There is currently no funding available to continue the program this coming summer.The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration what would be needed to continue the program this summer.Pandemic-related changes to state and city regulations are no longer in effect which previously help facilitate the program.See Council Added item I-Y for a placeholder to achieve some of these policy goals in the coming year. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section (None) Page 18 Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section (None) Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Interest on General Obligation Series 2o19A,Series 202o and Series 2021 General Obligation Bond Series 2019A,was issued in October 2019 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $22,840,00o.At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee.Since then,unspent bond proceeds have earned interest.This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including interest earned from September 2021 through November 2022. General Obligation Bond Series 2020,was issued in September 2020 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $17,745,000.At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee.Since then,unspent bond proceeds have earned interest.This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including interest earned from September 2021 through November 2022. General Obligation Bonds Series 2021,was issued in November 2021 to fund reconstruction of City streets.Par value of the issued bonds was $2o,600,000.At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee.Since then,unspent bond proceeds have earned interest.This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from December 2021 through November 2022. D-2: Steiner Roof Replacement—County and CIP Portions WITHDRAWN BY THE ADMINISTRATION D-3: 300 West Roadway Bond Adjustments Public Services Engineering Division is requesting to revise the second tranche of bond funds.The 300 West project —Cost Center 83-21201 is coming in under budget in the amount of$2,150,000.To ensure we utilize all of the bond funds before they expire,it is in our best interest to move these funds to Cost Center 83-21203 which is a Bond Contingency Cost Center.This will provide flexibility to use these funds on other approved bond projects within the bond's scope as funding is needed.The potential funding uses includes local street reconstruction candidates as listed below. • 600 S from goo W to Boo W at an initial estimated cost of$746,984 • 800 W from ARAPAHOE AV to 600 S at an initial estimated cost of$191,476 • 800 W from ARAPAHOE AV to 700 S at an initial estimated cost of$218,1og • goo S from 11oo E to 12oo E at an initial estimated cost of$501,825 • BRYAN AVE from 800 E to goo E at an initial estimated cost of$310,153 • INDUSTRIAL RD from 2100 S to ASSOCIATED AV at an initial estimated cost of$401,643 • JEFFERSON ST from TERMINUS END to 1400 S at an initial estimated cost of$80,300 • KENSINGTON AVE from 800 E to goo E at an initial estimated cost of$308,933 • LIBERTY AVE from LAKE ST to 800 E at an initial estimated cost of$81,454 • ROOSEVELT AVE from 600 E to 70o E at an initial estimated cost of$239,128 D-4: Insurance Funds for City and County Building/Earthquake Damage Public Services'Engineering division has been working with the City's Insurance carrier(FM Global)to receive funding for earthquake damages to the City and County building.The amount has been agreed to and is currently being processed.This amendment allows for the revenue to be recorded and the corresponding expense budget of $7,252,300. D-5: IMS Budget for New General Fund Positions Budget was approved for a$207,000 general fund transfer to IMS for the cost of hardware for newly funded general fund positions,but the budget for the revenue coming in from the general fund and the expenditure on the hardware was inadvertently left out of the IMS budget.This amendment will rectify that mistake. D-6: Real Property Purchase—CIP Budget Associated with BA#4 Council-Added Initiative In budget amendment#4 the Council added a general fund budget of$3,567,564 for a real property purchase. Typically,real property purchases are budgeted in a CIP cost center in order for the asset to be capitalized.This amendment will add the necessary CIP budget for the purchase. Page 19 D-7: Move Cost of Bond Issuance Costs from CIP to Debt Service Fund Class Per GASB 65,the cost of issuance for bonds is a non-capital expense.The cost of issuance budgets for General Obligation Bonds,Series 2022,and Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 C Federally Taxable were recorded in Fund Class 83 CIP. Fund Class 83 CIP is reserved for capital expense.The proper accounting treatment for cost of issuance expense budgets is to record them in Fund Class 81 Debt Service.This budget amendment proposes to move the approved cost of issuance non-capital budgets from Fund Class 83 CIP to Fund Class 81 Debt Service. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-i:Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance Program 2 Additional Resources($4 Million Grant) This budget amendment is to recognize the City's additional allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act,Treasury Emergency Rent Assistance Program 2(ERAP 2)funds,in the amount of$4,000,000,for the purpose of assisting in the stabilization and recovery of COVID-affected,low-income renters in Salt Lake City.All ERAP 2 funds must be obligated by September 30,2025. The Administration is proposing to split the funds into two uses: - $2 million for rental assistance including security deposits,utilities,and past due amounts,and - $2 million for a public competitive application process to fund eligible housing stability services provided by community-based organizations which include: o Case management, o Eviction prevention and diversion programs, o Mediation between landlords and tenants, o Housing counseling including Fair Housing Act protections and requirements, o Housing navigators or promotors that help households access emergency rental assistance programs or find housing, o Housing related services for survivors of domestic abuse or human trafficking, o Legal services or attorney's fees related to eviction proceedings and maintaining housing stability, and o Specialized services for individuals with disabilities or seniors that support their ability to access or maintain housing. The Utah Rent Relief program and website rentrelief.utah.gov stopped accepting applications on February 5,2023. The$2 million proposed for rental assistance would go through the Utah Rent Relief program to fund applications submitted before the deadline. This budget amendment is separate from previous Council-approved City ERAP allocations: ERAP 1 Initial Award ($6,067,033),ERAP 1 Additional Allocation($3,000,000),ERAP 1 Additional Allocation($5,000,000),and ERAP 2 Initial Award($4,800,559.40). $1,031,336 from the earlier ERAP 2 award are still available and expected to be spent this year.All ERAP 1 funds had a spending deadline of December 29,2022. Policy Questions: ➢ Prioritizing between Rent Assistance and Housing Stability Services—The Council may wish to discuss how to prioritize the $4 million of additional funding among the eligible uses listed above. ➢ Delegating Authority for Final Funding Decision—Does the Council want to delegate authority for the Administration to make final funding decisions on awards to providers of eligible housing stability services or retain final funding decision making authority after receiving funding recommendations from an advisory board and Mayor? Section F: Donations (None) Page I to Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 5 G-1: Know Your Neighbor Grant Program, Open Society Foundation-Salt Lake County($61,000 from Miscellaneous Grants) The Mayor's Office of Equity&Inclusion received$61,000 in grant funding from Salt Lake County as a pass through from the County's application to the Operation Afghan Resettlement Support(OARS)program.The County was awarded$150,000 and is requesting to partner with Salt Lake City's Know Your Neighbor Program to assist the County in assimilating and welcoming the Afghan Refugees.The funding will be used to hire a new part-time program coordinator and not more than$1,000 for the program coordinator to travel for program related purposes. No match is required.A public hearing will be held for this grant application on 1o/18/2022. G-2: Utah State Office of Education, Child and Adult Care Food Program-Youth After School Programs($46,000 from Miscellaneous Grants) The Youth&Family Division of Public Services applied for and received a continuation grant offered annually by the Utah State Office of Education,under the Child and Adult Care Food Program.These funds are available to youth service providers as part of the At-Risk Snack Program to reimburse for the costs of snacks served to children participating in the after-school programs.Central City Recreation Center,Fairmont Park,Glendale Library, Liberty Park,Northwest Rec.Center,Ottinger Hall,the Youth and Family Division Office,and Sorenson Campus will receive reimbursement directly through the State Office of Education and will receive up to$46,000,based on qualified snack expenses. SLC is reimbursed on a monthly basis and only qualified healthy snacks and meals served to children participating in the after-school enrichment/education activities during the afterschool program hours are eligible for reimbursement.A public hearing was held for the grant application on 10/4/2022. Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 6 G-i: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services(COPS),FY22 Community Police Development(CPD)Grant The Police department applied for and received a$24,170 grant from the U.S.Department of Justice,Community Oriented Policing Services through the FY22 Community Policing Development Grant.The grant will fund an evaluation for the Promising Youth Project.The project will fund training and curriculum recommended by the evaluation contractor.The Police Department will develop an evaluation that will provide four major services: Evaluation of Program Fidelity,Evaluation of Program Outcomes,Training and Technical Assistance,and development of a Final Report.A Public Hearing was held on 07/19/2022 for the grant application on this award. Section I: Council Added Items Placeholder I-1: Downtown Streets Enhanced Activation($500,000*from General Fund Balance) Some Council Members expressed interest in funding enhanced street activation in the downtown area particularly during the summer.Additional discussion and work would be needed to determine what types of activation activities would be eligible for this funding and feasible within the months before the summer. (*$500,000 is a placeholder and actual amount needed will depend on identifying activities and times) I-2:Technology Upgrades in the Committee of the Whole and Formal Chamber Rooms($8o,000 from General Fund Balance) These one-time funds would be for additional technology improvements to the two rooms the Council uses for open and public meetings.Many of the upgrades are related to communication and network equipment needed to successfully run hybrid meetings.The funds may also be used for removable ADA accessibility ramps in the Formal Chamber. I-3: Physical Security Improvements to City Hall($1-3 Million from General Fund Balance to CIP Fund Holding Account) These one-time funds would be used for additional physical security improvements to City Hall.The funds would be placed into a holding account pending specific project proposals to use the funds.The amount is a placeholder based on previous Council discussions/estimates and is not based on cost estimates for specific projects. I-4: "Lockhart Alley"Reconstructing Three Sections($208,373 from General Fund Balance to CIP Fund) Page 1 11 These one-time funds would be used to reconstruct three sections of the alley from 1300 South to Kensington.The alley is located between Major Street and State Street.The funds would address drainage issues and repaving.The funding does not include fencing,lighting,or other enhancements. Policy Questions: ➢ Status of Alley Programs and Funding—The Council may wish to ask the Administration how much funding remains from the special pilot program funded two years ago,and the alley maintenance funding from FY2023 CIP. Both prior appropriations could also be used for this project. ➢ Fencing, Lighting and Other Potential Needs—The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether additional funding is needed beyond addressing pavement and drainage issues along this alley,and whether Public Utilities has funding that could be contributed to the project. ATTACHMENTS (none) ACRONYMS ABL—Avenues Baseball League BA—Budget Amendment CIP—Capital Improvement Program COPS—Community Oriented Policing Services CPD—Community Police Development Grant ERAP—Emergency Rental Assistance Program FY—Fiscal Year FOF—Funding Our Future GASB—Governmental Accounting Standards Board GF—General Fund IMS—Information Management Services OARS—Operation Afghan Resettlement Support Program POST—Police Officer Standards and Training PUBS—Public Utilities Bulling System RDA—Redevelopment Agency Page 12 ERIN MENDENHALL MARY BETH THOMPSON Mayor Chief Financial Officer DEPART=or FIXANCE CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 02/14/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 02/14/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 1411, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer N.7 a.ex a SUBJECT: Budget Amendment#5 - Revised SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director (801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson(801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY2022-23 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND 0.00 4,451,976.00 CIP FUND 14,216,233.99 14,216,233.99 IMS FUND 3,099,185.00 3,099,185.00 MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS FUND 4,131,170.00 8,431,170.00 DONATION FUND 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 DEBT SERVICE FUND 334,957.90 334,957.90 TOTAL $22,781,546.89 $31,533,522.89 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 238 PO BOX 145467,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2022-23 Budget Adiustments The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2023. Amended Variance Favorable Revenue FY22-FY23 Annual Budget FY22-23 Amended Budget Revised Forecast (Unfavorable) Property Taxes 125,012,927 125,012,927 125,012,927 - Sale and Use Taxes 105,050,018 105,050,018 108,269,378 3,219,360 Franchise Taxes 11,657,128 11,657,128 11,640,553 (16,575) Payment in Lieu of Taxes 1,638,222 1,638,222 1,638,222 - Total Taxes 243,358,295 243,358,295 246,561,080 3,202,785 Licenses and Permits 40,736,114 40,736,114 41,114,687 378,573 Intergovernmental Revenue 4,644,622 4,644,622 4,722,377 77,755 Interest Income 2,071,154 2,071,154 4,771,154 2,700,000 Fines 3,765,174 3,765,174 3,817,666 52,492 Parking Meter Collections 2,635,475 2,635,475 2,635,475 - Charges,Fees,and Rentals 4,432,794 4,432,794 4,887,307 454,513 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,438,710 3,438,710 3,857,347 418,637 Interfund Reimbursement 24,431,717 24,431,717 24,422,422 (9,295) Transfers 28,821,993 34,921,993 34,829,993 (92,000 Total W/O Special Tax 358,336,048 364,436,048 371,619,508 7,183,460 Additional Sales Tax(1/2%) 44,364,490 44,364,490 45,614,490 1,250,000 Total General Fund 402,700,538 408,800,538 417,233,998 8,433,460 The current projections for fiscal year 2023 projections continue to be positive. Sales tax is currently projected to exceed budget by $3.2 million while the sales tax associated with Funding Our Future is projected to exceed budget by $1.25 million. Building permits continue to stay strong projecting to be over budget by $378,573. Charges and services is projecting to be over budget because of strong numbers from police service revenues, while miscellaneous revenue shows an increase over budget due to an increase in fuel reimbursement costs. The City is also projecting a large surplus due to the rising interest rates. Fund balance has been updated with information from the 2022 ACFR, including proposed changes for BA#5 fund balance would be projected as follows for FY2023: Beginning Fund Balance Budgeted Change in Fund Balance ' Prior Year Encumbrances gi ' Estimated Beginning Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance Percent Year End CAFR Adjustments I I Revenue Changes j Expense Changes(Prepaids,Receivable,Etc.) I I Fund Balance w/CAFR Changes Final Fund Balance Percent I I Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance I I BA#1 Revenue Adjustment BA#1 Expense Adjustment BA#2 Revenue Adjustment BA#2 Expense Adjustment BA#3 Revenue Adjustment BA#3 Expense Adjustment I I BA#4 Revenue Adjustment BA#4 Expense Adjustment BA#5 Revenue Adjustment # BA#5 Expense Adjustment f BA#6 Revenue Adjustment BA#6 Expense Adjustment I I BA#7 Revenue Adjustment BA#7 Expense Adjustment I I Change in Revenue Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase I I Adjusted Fund Balance ® � Adjusted Fund Balance Percent I I Proposed/Adopted Revenue Adjusted fund balance is projected to be at 23.34%. The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $22,781,546.89 of revenue and expense of$31,533,522.89. The amendment proposes changes in six funds, with one FTE. The amendment also includes the use of$4,451,976.00 from the General Fund fund balance. The proposal includes twenty-one initiatives for Council review. A summary spreadsheet document, outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget opening is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Fifth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-2023) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2022 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2022, and Ending June 30, 2023. In June of 2022, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2023, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City's Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2022. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Approved As To Form (SEAL) � Qa� Jaysen Oldroyd Bill No. of 2023. Published: 2 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#5 Administration Proposed Council Approved AmountExpenditure Expenditure Ongoing or One- Section A: New Items 1 Rapid Intervention Team Trailer GF - 25,000.00 One-time - 2 City and County Building Earthquake GF 2,300,000.00 One-time Repairs-General Fund Supplement 2 City and County Building Earthquake CIP 2,300,000.00 2,300,000.00 One-time Repairs-General Fund Supplement 3 Fiber Conduit Phase 2-200 S. IMS 242,185.00 242,185.0o One-time 4 Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal 5 Public Safety Radio Cost Increase IMS 2,400,000.00 2,400,000.00 One-time 6 Consulting for the Enterprise Billing IMS 250,000.00 250,000.00 One-time Systems 7 Lindsey Gardens CIP Project Rescope CIP - (402,938.57) One-time 7 Lindsey Gardens CIP Project Rescope CIP (56,421.90) One-time 7 Lindsey Gardens CIP Project Rescope CIP 459,360.47 One-time 8 Donation for the Cemetery Donation 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 One-time 9 Bonuses for Police POST Training, Misc Grants 4,300,000.00 One-time Recruitment and Retention 9 Bonuses for Police POST Training, GF 1,201,976.0o Ongoing Recruitment and Retention io Real Property Purchase GF - 825,000.00 One-time io Real Property Purchase CIP 825,000.00 825,000.00 One-time 11 Main Street Pedestrian Mall Conceptual GF - 100,000.00 One-time Design Study Section B:Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources 1 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#5 Section D: Housekeeping 1 Interest on General Obligation Series 2o19A, CIP 62,203.69 62,203.69 One-time Series 202o and Series 2021 1 Interest on General Obligation Series 2o19A, CIP 222,627.19 222,627.19 One-time Series 202o and Series 2021 1 Interest on General Obligation Series 2o19A, CIP 321,497.01 321,497.01 One-time Series 202o and Series 2021 2 Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal 3 300 West Roadway Bond Adjustments CIP - (2,150,000.00) One-time 3 300 West Roadway Bond Adjustments CIP 2,150,000.00 One-time Insurance Funds for City and County 4 Building CIP 7,252,300.00 7,252,300.00 One-time 5 IMS Budget for New GF Positions IMS 207,000.00 207,000.00 One-time Real Property Purchase-CIP Budget 6 Associated with BA#4 Council-Added CIP 3,567,564-00 3,567,564.00 One-time Initiative Move Cost of Issuance Costs from CIP to CIP 1 0 1 One-time 7 Debt Service Fund Class ( 94>957.9 ) ( 94>957.90) Move Cost of Issuance Costs from CIP to Debt Service 1 0 One-time 7 Debt Service Fund Class 94,957.90 1 94,957.9 7 Move Cost of Issuance Costs from CIP to CIP (140,000.00) (140,000.00) One-time Debt Service Fund Class 7 Move Cost of Issuance Costs from CIP to Debt Service 140,000.00 140,000.00 One-time Debt Service Fund Class Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 1 Treasury ERAP 2 Additional Resources Misc Grants 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 One-time Section F: Donations 2 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#5 Section G: Council Consent Agenda--Grant Awards Consent Agenda#5 1 Know Your Neighbor Grant Program,Open Misc Grants 61,000.00 61,000.0o One-time Society Foundation-Salt Lake County Utah State Office of Education,Child and 2 Adult Care Food Program-Youth After Misc Grants 46,000.00 46,000.0o One-time School Programs Consent Agenda#6 1 U S Department of Justice,Community Misc Grants 24,170.00 24,170.00 One-time Oriented Policing Services(COPS),FY22 Community Police Development(CPD) Grant Section I: Council Added Items Total of Budget Amendment Items 22,781,546.89 31,533,522.89 - Administration Proposed Council Approved OngoingExpenditure Expenditure Number/Name Total by Fund Class,BudgetAmendment#4: General Fund GF 4,451,976.00 CIP Fund CIP 14,216,233.99 14,216,233.99 IMS Fund IMS 3,099,185.00 3,099,185.00 Miscellaneous Grant Fund Misc Grants 4,131,170.00 8,431,170.00 - Donation Fund Donation 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 Debt Service Fund Debt Service 334,957.90 334,957.90 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 22,781 6.8 1 z2.8 3 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#5 Current Year Budget Summary,provided for information only FY2o22-23 Budget,Including Budget Amendments ITY 2022-23 BA#1 Total BA#2 Total BA#3 Total BA#4 Total BA#5 Total Total Revenue Adopted General Fund(FC 10) 425,537,408 100,000 6,000,000 194,600 431,832,008 Curb and Gutter(FC 20) 3,000 3,000 DEA Task Force Fund(FC 41) 1,762,560 1,762,560 Misc Special Service Districts(FC 46) 1,700,000 1,700,000 Street Lighting Enterprise(FC 48) 4,302,222 4,302,222 Water Fund(FC 51) 108,196,368 36,680,000 260,687 145,137,055 Sewer Fund(FC 52) 196,630,907 196,630,907 Storm Water Fund(FC 53) 13,476,733 13,476,733 Airport Fund(FC 54,55,56) 302,268,600 302,268,600 Refuse Fund(FC 57) 21,458,105 21,458,105 Golf Fund(FC 59) 11,560,676 25,700 11,586,376 E-911 Fund(FC 60) 3,925,000 3,925,000 Fleet Fund(FC 61) 28,826,992 120,000 1,119,900 30,066,892 IMS Fund(FC 65) 30,523,167 2,627,420 3,099,185 36,249,772 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation(FC 69) 9,600,000 9,600,000 CDBG Operating Fund(FC 71) 4,670,517 4,670,517 Miscellaneous Grants(FC 72) 34,158,918 2,749,584 2,517,995 8,103,151 4,131,170 51,66o,8i8 Other Special Revenue(FC 73) 300,000 300,000 Donation Fund(FC 77) 2,920,250 20,000 44,668 1,000,000 3,984,918 Housing Loans&Trust(FC 78) 16,217,000 16,217,000 Debt Service Fund(FC 81) 32,037,989 (2,951,727) 334,958 29,421,220 CIP Fund(FC 83,84&86) 35,460,387 6,603,019 5,267,217 91,967,958 14,216,234 153,514,815 Governmental Immunity(FC 85) 3,964,523 2,000,000 500,000 6,464,523 Risk Fund(FC 87) 54,679,000 54,679,000 Total of Budget Amendment items 1,344,180,322 11,592,603 51,009,880 101,347,689 22,781,547 1,530,912,041 4 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#5 Current Year Budget Summary,provided for information only FY2o22-23 Budget,Including Budget Amendments Total Expense BA#1 Total BA#2 Total BA#3 Total BA#4 Total BA#5 Total Total Expense General Fund(FC 10) 425,537,408 847,540 6,538,000 7,584,328 4,451,976 444,959,252 Curb and Gutter(FC 20) 3,000 3,000 DEA Task Force Fund(FC 41) 1,762,560 1,762,560 Misc Special Service Districts(FC 46) 1,700,000 1,700,000 Street Lighting Enterprise(FC 48) 5,757,825 5,757,825 Water Fund(FC 51) 132,752,815 36,680,000 260,687 169,693,502 Sewer Fund(FC 52) 255,914,580 255,914,580 Storm Water Fund(FC 53) 18,699,722 18,699,722 Airport Fund(FC 54,55,56) 384,681,671 688,818,000 1,073,499,671 Refuse Fund(FC 57) 24,952,672 3,035,700 27,988,372 Golf Fund(FC 59) 14,726,016 46,800 14,772,816 E-911 Fund(FC 60) 3,800,385 3,800,385 Fleet Fund(FC 61) 30,426,032 4,011,360 10,678,500 45,115,892 IMS Fund(FC 65) 30,523,i67 2,782,449 3,099,185 36,404,801 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation(FC 69) 9,458,748 9,458,748 CDBG Operating Fund(FC 71) 4,958,433 4,958,433 Miscellaneous Grants(FC 72) 26,614,153 2,749,584 2,517,995 8,481,711 8,431,170 48,794,613 Other Special Revenue(FC 73) 300,000 300,000 Donation Fund(FC 77) 287,250 20,000 44,668 1,000,000 1,351,918 Housing Loans&Trust(FC 78) 25,779,253 100,000 25,879,253 Debt Service Fund(FC 81) 33,658,558 (2,951,727) 334,958 31,041,789 CIP Fund(FC 83,84&86) 35,460,387 11,713,917 12,267,217 96,317,958 14,216,234 169,975,713 Governmental Immunity(FC 85) 3,169,767 2,000,000 500,000 5,669,767 Risk Fund(FC 87) 54,679,000 54,679,000 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,525,603,402 21,442,401 688,818,000 61,583,580 123,200,706 31,533,523 2,452,181,612 Budget Manager Analyst,City Council Contingent Appropriation Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative Section A:New Items A-1: Rapid Intervention Team Trailer GF $25,000.00 Department:Public Services Prepared By:Jim Cleland For questions please include:Jim Cleland,Jorge Chammoro The Rapid Intervention Team has been in operation since July, 2022. Improvements in the processes and procedures had led to the need for one more trailer. The team begins at 6:ooam and immediately go to the landfill. They begin their remediations at around 7:3oam and usually fill one trailer by 11:ooam. By this time the wait at the SLC Landfill is approximately 2 hours. There is not enough time in the day for two trips to the landfill. With a second trailer they can fill both trailers by 2:00 PM and be ready to dump again in the morning.A second trailer outfitted is estimated at $25,000. A-2: City and County Building Earthquake Repairs — GF $2,300,000.00 General Fund Supplement CIP $2,300,000.00 Department:Public Services Prepared By:Dustin Petersen For questions please include: Dustin Petersen,Jorge Chammoro,City Engineer Public Services Engineering has been working with the City's insurance company(FM Global)on being fronted funding for repairs to the City and County Building.The Insurance company will only reimburse loss items as assessed on date of loss(March 2020).As with many city contracts the expenses have increased from the time of the event. Budget Amendment is requesting supplemental funds from the General Fund,to ensure contracts can be executed according to the full extent of repairs needed.Upon project completion,any unused funds will be returned to the General Fund. A current list of earthquake expenses is included as an attachment at the end of the document(Attachment#1) A-3: Fiber Conduit Phase 2-200 S IMS $242,185.00 Department:IMS Prepared By:Joseph Anthony For questions please include:Aaron Bentley,Joseph Anthony This is part of the 200 south roadway project.The projected costs are more than anticipated and budgeted.The council approved$5ok as part of the FY23 budget,but the actual costs based on the current engineering estimate are $292,185. Therefore,we are requesting an increase to the budget for the difference of$242,185.This will allow the city to improve our connection between city offices and the airport as well as pioneer park. A-4:Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal A-5: Public Safety Radio Cost Increases IMS $2,400,000.00 Department:IMS Prepared By:Joseph Anthony For questions please include:Aaron Bentley,Joseph Anthony Due to an updated quote from Motorola we are requesting an increase in the budget for the radios in the amount of 2.4 Million.This money will come from the IMS Fund balance.Please see the attached quote for the details (Attachment #2). Administration would like to request a straw poll on this item.The straw poll is being requested because it's imperative the Administration move forward on the contract process to avoid a further 8%increase in the cost of the radios. 1 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative A-6: Consulting for the Enterprise Billing Systems IMS $250,000.00 Department:IMS Prepared By:Joseph Anthony For questions please include:Aaron Bentley,Joseph Anthony This request is for consulting services for Enterprise Billing systems for PUBS which is primarily used by Sustainability and Public Utilities.PUBS Needs to be replaced and the consultant will do an analysis of the City's needs and compare that to best practices and make a recommendation on where the city should be moving with regards to future decisions. Microsoft's current roadmap has our current solution mapped at the end of life by FY 2025.As such,we need to start finding a solution in this fiscal year to be able to have it in place by the beginning of FY 2025. The cost is based on an estimated 1,000 that will be needed for the consultation at$250 per hour. It is estimated to be a total of$250,000. A-7: Lindsey Gardens CIP Project Rescope CIP -$402,93g•57 CIP -$56,421.90 CIP $459,36o•47 Department:Public Lands Prepared By:Kyle Shields For questions please include: Kristin Riker,Kyle Shields, Gregg Evans The Public Lands Department is requesting a Budget Amendment to revise the scope of work for existing CIP funded projects. The original scope of work for Lindsey Gardens Concessions had two projects(83-204o8,86-19408)that supported baseball concessions and public access. The department has struggled with estimates that would come in under budget for either project.The first project involved new construction as well as a new location for an aging concession stand and the second,a new path to link parking lot access to the middle field.As cost estimates rose,it was decided to keep the standing location,but remove it to build a new,smaller,and simpler version. Rapidly rising building costs brought this new construction bid in even higher than the original plan,and the second idea had to be rejected. With these concerns,Engineering,Parks,and the Avenues Baseball League decided that a facelift to the existing stand would be sufficient and ask that the scope of work be adjusted for both projects to spend the remaining funds as outlined below: - Concession stand renovation - Pedestrian path to middle field - Batting cage renovation - Covering dugouts with shade canopies - Trail from middle field to lower field The Avenues Baseball League supports the scope change as they are the ones that submitted the application in 2018. They have seen the costs associated with the building and path and asked if we could rescope the project to better use the funds that we have to improve all of the baseball fields at Lindsey Gardens. The following is a note from the league President: This note is to confirm that the Board of Directors of the Avenues Baseball League(ABL)has been informed of and approved the changes to the scope of work at Lindsey Gardens.As president of the league,I have been involved with you,Dat,Preston,and others to change the scope of work and establish new priorities given the anticipated cost overruns after getting the bids for the original scope of work.I have communicated the revised scope of work and the priority of the projects to the ABL board. The board agrees with the priorities that we have discussed and is eager to get on with the project. 2 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative Bart Cocke President,Avenues Baseball League According to the cost estimate for the scope of work above there isn't enough funding to do all of the items,but the list is prioritized and Public Lands will work through and make the funding go as far as possible. A-8: Donation for the Cemetery Donation $1,000,000.00 Department:Public Lands Prepared By:Gregg Evans For questions please include: Gregg Evans,Kristin Riker This amendment recognizes a donation to the City for cemetery maintenance. A-9: Bonuses for Police POST Training,Recruitment Misc Grants $4,300,000.00 and Retention GF $1,201,976.00 Department:Police Prepared By: Chief Mike Brown For questions please include: Chief Brown,Shellie Dietrich,Mary Beth Thompson The Salt Lake City Police Department(SLCPD)is committed to recruiting the best and brightest individuals to join its team to help provide a safe and thriving community.Today,law enforcement agencies across the country continue experiencing challenges recruiting and hiring qualified police candidates.To that end,the department is seeking funding to provide a hiring bonus of$1o,000 to lateral officers with a two-year commitment to employment with the department.Additionally,the department is seeking funding to provide a$5,000 bonus to qualified new SLCPD officers who have graduated from a self-sponsored,state-certified Utah Peace Officer Standards and Training(POST)academy. Finally,the department is seeking funding to provide a one-time retention bonus for current sworn members. The funding being requested for the above-mentioned bonuses this fiscal year includes $4.3 million from ARPA funds and$1.2 million from the general fund. A more detailed breakdown is contained in the table below. Total Retention and Hiring Program Cost Total Cost Program Estimate ARPA GF-23 GF- 24 Lateral Hiring $ 367,000 $ 200,000 $ 83,500 $ 83,500 Academy Hiring $ 36,700 $ 36,700 $ - $ - Retention $ 6,142,112 $4,o63,300 $ 1,118,476 $ 96o,336 Total 1 $ 6,545,812 1 SOON I NUNN $ 1,043,836 Further information is contained in the memo from Chief Brown that is attached at the end of the transmittal (Attachment#3) 3 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative A-io: Real Property Purchase GF $825,000.00 CIP $825,000.00 Department:Finance Prepared By:Mary Beth Thompson For questions please include:Mary Beth Thompson Funds are being requested in conjunction with the$3.56 million included as a Council-added item for property acquisition on budget amendment#4. A-ii:Main Street Pedestrian Mall Conceptual Design GF $100,000.00 Study Department:Economic Development Prepared By:Lorena Riffo-Jenson For questions please include: Lorena Riffo-Jenson,Mary Beth Thompson,Lisa Shaffer Salt Lake City's Department of Economic Development is seeking consultant services to develop a conceptual design study that will provide a vision,high level recommendations,and a path toward implementing the Main Street pedestrian mall.The consultant selected will be responsible for managing all aspects of the project outlined in this scope of work,including examining the current street conditions,creating planning and design recommendations(including emergency vehicle access,maintenance,utilities access,accessibility considerations,operations and maintenance needs, landscaping,and drainage,etc.),visualizing concept designs,public outreach,and calculating a cost analysis for each future phase of the project. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-i: Interest on General Obligation Series 2oi9A,Series CIP $62,203.69 202o and Series 2021 CIP $222,627.19 CIP $321,497.01 Department:Finance Prepared By:Brandon Bagley For questions please include:Brandon Bagley,Marina Scott,Mary Beth Thompson General Obligation Bond Series 2019A,was issued in October 2019 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $22,840,000.At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee.Since then,unspent bond proceeds have earned interest.This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including interest earned from September 2021 through November 2022. General Obligation Bond Series 2020,was issued in September 2020 to fund reconstruction of City streets.Par value of the issued bonds was $17,745,000.At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee.Since then,unspent bond proceeds have earned interest.This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including interest earned from September 2021 through November 2022. 4 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative General Obligation Bonds Series 2021,was issued in November 2021 to fund reconstruction of City streets.Par value of the issued bonds was $20,600,000.At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee.Since then,unspent bond proceeds have earned interest.This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from December 2021 through November 2022. 5 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative D-2:Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal D-3: 300 West Roadway Bond Adjustments CIP -$2,15O,OOO.00 CIP $2,15O,OOO.00 Department:Public Services Prepared By:Joshua Willie For question please include: Joshua Willie, Jorge Chamorro, Brandon Bagley,Mike Atkinson, Dustin Petersen Public Services Engineering Division is requesting to revise the second tranche of bond funds.The 300 West project-Cost Center 83-21201 is coming in under budget in the amount of$2,150,000.00.To ensure we utilize all of the bond funds before they expire,it is in our best interest to move these funds to Cost Center 83-21203 which is a Bond Contingency Cost Center.This will provide flexibility to use these funds on other approved bond projects within the bond's scope as funding is needed.The potential funding uses includes local street reconstruction candidates as listed below. • 60o S from goo W to 800 W at an initial estimated cost of$746,984 • 800 W from ARAPAHOE AV to 600 S at an initial estimated cost of$191,476 • 800 W from ARAPAHOE AV to 700 S at an initial estimated cost of$218,109 • goo S from iloo E to 120o E at an initial estimated cost of$501,825 • BRYAN AVE from 800 E to goo E at an initial estimated cost of$310,153 • INDUSTRIAL RD from 2100 S to ASSOCIATED AV at an initial estimated cost of$401,643 • JEFFERSON ST from TERMINUS END to 1400 S at an initial estimated cost of$80,300 • KENSINGTON AVE from 800 E to goo E at an initial estimated cost of$308,933 • LIBERTY AVE from LAKE ST to 800 E at an initial estimated cost of$81,454 • ROOSEVELT AVE from 600 E to 70o E at an initial estimated cost of$239,128 6 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative D-4: Insurance Funds for City and County Building CIP $7,252,300.00 Department:Public Services Prepared By:Dustin Petersen For questions please include:Jorge Chamorro,Jim Cleland, City Engineer,Mary Beth Thompson,Dustin Petersen Public Services'Engineering division has been working with the City's Insurance carrier(FM Global)to receive funding for earthquake damages to the City and County building.The amount has been agreed to and is currently being processed. This amendment allows for the revenue to be recorded and the corresponding expense budget of$7,252,300. D-5: IMS Budget for New GF Positions IMS $207,000.00 Department:IMS Prepared By:Randy Hillier For questions please include:Joseph Anthony,Aaron Bentley,Randy Hillier,John Vuyk Budget was approved for a $207,000 general fund transfer to IMS for the cost of hardware for newly funded general fund positions,but the budget for the revenue coming in from the general fund and the expenditure on the hardware was inadvertently left out of the IMS budget. This amendment will rectify that mistake. D-6: Real Property Purchase-CIP Budget Associated CIP $3,567,564.00 with BA#4 Council-Added Initiative Department:Finance Prepared By:Randy Hillier For questions please include: Randy Hillier,John Vuyk In budget amendment#4 the Council added a general fund budget of$3,567,564 for a real property purchase. Typically, real property purchases are budgeted in a CIP cost center in order for the asset to be capitalized. This amendment will add the necessary CIP budget for the purchase. D-7: Move Cost of Issuance Costs from CIP to Debt CIP -$194,957.90 Service Fund Class Debt Service $194,957.90 CIP -$140,000.00 Debt Service $140,000.00 Department:Finance Prepared By:Brandon Bagley For questions please include: Brandon Bagley,Nancy Sanders,Mike Atkinson Per GASB 65,the cost of issuance for bonds is a non-capital expense.The cost of issuance budgets for General Obligation Bonds,Series 2022,and Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds,Series 2022 C Federally Taxable were recorded in Fund Class 83 CIP. Fund Class 83 CIP is reserved for capital expense.The proper accounting treatment for cost of issuance expense budgets is to record them in Fund Class 81 Debt Service.This budget amendment proposes to move the approved cost of issuance non-capital budgets from Fund Class 83 CIP to Fund Class 81 Debt Service. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1:Treasury ERAP 2 Additional Resources Misc Grants $4,000,000.00 Department:CAN Prepared By:Tony Milner For questions please include:Tony Milner,Brent Beck,Ann Garcia This budget amendment is to recognize the City's additional allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act,Treasury Emergency Rent Assistance Program 2(ERAP 2)funds,in the amount of$4,000,000,for the purpose of assisting in the stabilization and recovery of COVID-affected,low-income residential renters in Salt Lake City. 7 Salt Lake City FY2O22-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative This budget amendment is separate from previous Council-approved City ERAP allocations: ERAP 1 Initial Award ($6,067,033),ERAP 1 Additional Allocation($3,000,000),ERAP 1 Additional Allocation($5,000,000),and ERAP 2 Initial Award($4,800,559.40)• To administer this additional ERAP 2 allocation the City will contract with the State of Utah,Department of Workforce Services'(DWS)online Utah Rent Relief application portal,https://rentrelief.utah.gov/.The City has previously and successfully contracted with DWS for the City's ERAP 1 and 2 funds. This budget amendment aligns with Treasury guidance on eligible activities and allowable percentage amounts for ERAP 2. Direct Client Assistance: Deposits,rent,utilities,rent arrears,and utility arrears. Housing Stability Services:Treasury guidance for eligible Housing Stability services include: Case management,Eviction prevention,Eviction diversion programs,Mediation between landlords and tenants,Housing counseling,Fair housing counseling,Housing navigators or promotoras that help households access ERA programs or find housing, Housing- related services for survivors of domestic abuse or human trafficking,Legal services or attorney's fees related to eviction proceedings and maintaining housing stability,Specialized services for individuals with disabilities or seniors that support their ability to access or maintain housing. A public competitive process would receive applications from providers for eligible Housing Stability services. All ERAP 2 funds must be obligated by September 30, 2025. Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda*5 G-i: Know Your Neighbor Grant Program, Open Misc Grants $61,000.00 Society Foundation-Salt Lake County Department:Mayor's Office Prepared By: Kaletta Lynch/Ann Garcia The Mayor's Office of Equity&Inclusion received$61,00o in grant funding from Salt Lake County as a pass through from the County's application to the Operation Afghan Resettlement Support(OARS)program.The County was awarded $150,00o and is requesting to partner with Salt Lake City's Know Your Neighbor Program to assist the County in assimilating and welcoming the Afghan Refugees. The funding will be used to hire a new part-time program coordinator and not more than$I,000 for the program coordinator to travel for program related purposes. No match is required. A public hearing was held for this grant application on 10/18/2022. 8 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative G-2: Utah State Office of Education, Child and Adult Misc Grants $46,000.00 Care Food Program-Youth After School Programs Department:CAN Prepared By:Kim Thomas/Ann Garcia The Youth&Family Division of Public Services applied for and received a continuation grant offered annually by the Utah State Office of Education,under the Child and Adult Care Food Program. These funds are available to youth service providers as part of the At-Risk Snack Program to reimburse for the costs of snacks served to children participating in the after-school programs. Central City Rec.Center,Fairmont Park,Glendale Library,Liberty Park,Northwest Rec.Center, Ottinger Hall,the Youth and Family Division Office,and Sorenson Campus will receive reimbursement directly through the State Office of Education and will receive up to$46,000,based on qualified snack expenses. SLC is reimbursed on a monthly basis and only qualified healthy snacks and meals served to children participating in the after-school enrichment/education activities during the afterschool program hours are eligible for reimbursement. A public hearing was held for the grant application on 10/4/2022. AgendaConsent G-i: U S Department of Justice, Community Oriented Misc Grants $24,170.00 Policing Services (COPS),FY22 Community Police Development(CPD)Grant Department:Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith/Ann Garcia The police department applied for and received a$24,170 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice,Community Oriented Policing Services through the FY22 Community Policing Development Grant. The grant will fund an evaluation for the Promising Youth Project.The project will fund training and curriculum recommended by the evaluation contractor. The Police Department will develop an evaluation that will provide four major services: Evaluation of Program Fidelity,Evaluation of Program Outcomes,Training and Technical Assistance,and development of a Final Report. A Public Hearing was held on 07/19/2022 for the grant application on this award. Section I: Council Added Items 9 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative Attachment #1 MKA MKA Not Obj—Code primary 5econaa Vendor TNRRR,—ion posting Inv. Description Pro)eR Achv" Ref. rV Ref. 1D Yentlor Name Description Se[ID Check# Date Debi[ Substantiate 5opportetl Location Vendor Inv.No. Date Description a Totat rotas 1:11 rotessional&TAN/A..N/A 10/0/2C TD530]9 CP2126130D684 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC TERRAC0NC0NSUCPIDO]20 50011253 R9/30/20 $2,396.50 $2,3SCIR SaRL k,CUy&Te—P,, TR530]9 04/20/20 EQdamage assessment. OtherProiessional&TAN/A..N/A 11121120300520 09128 SALT LAKE ARTS COUNCIL 1111 SALT LAKE ARTS Sis0HNS1019201.11121 10/21/20 $HLGPO 5160.0E SLC Arts C-61 Sill-Ity 10/05/20 Ocher Exp90se1 N/A.NJA OS/20/21 J E05192021 NV17796 N/A,N/A BLD2021-NZ49 JE05192021H 051OV21 $8,949.51 ITTT EXPENOITURE20APREq 117 20338 CP20232943629 MODERNROOFING&IONSTRUM0DERNR00DLIF081920 50009925 08/19/20 $12,864.00 $12,864-00 Sait Lake City&Modern Constn ll 11A 08/07/20 Temp-egress. NOITURE N/A..N/A 09/09/20 38100A 9109204628 GS B SPC OBA GSBSARCHITECGSBSPC DBA CAFCP090920 50010484 08/31/20 $15,080.00 51508E-00 Sait Lake Cley&6585 Aichlee<t 3810E 04/30/20 Eq damage assessment. REN/A..N/A 09/09/21 38111A OS/31/20 $13,554.00 $I3554.00 Sait Lake GUY&GSBS Arc1Z, OS/31/20 Exteriors,air design. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE N/A_N/A .111120 38152A CPI9109204628 GSBSPC DBA 6S BS ARCHITE(6S B S PC DBA CAI CP090920 50010484 O8/31/20 52,820.0E $2,870.00 Saie take CltY&GSBS Arcbltecc 38152 O5/31120 Selective demolition. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE N/A_N/A 09 ILA 3820EA CPI9109204628 GSBSPCDBAGSBSARCHITE(G S 8 I PC DBA CAI CR090920 500104B4 08/31/20 I14,231." 514,231.70 Sait take ClryIS GSBS Architects 38206 O6/30J20 Exterior state design. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE N/A..N/A D9/09120 38207A CP19109204628 PAR PC PC DBA G S B S ARCHITE(G S B S PC DBA CAI CP090920 KBERMAR4 08/31/20 $3,148.OD $3,148,00 Sait Lake Clty&GSBS Architect 38207 06/30/20 Selectivedemoft— CAPITALIXPENDITUREN/A..N/A D9/09/20 38342A CP19109204628 6 S B S PC DBAGSBSARCHITE(GSBSPC DBA CAL CP090920 SODI0484 08/31/20 $4,066.21 $4,066.20 Sait Lake Clry&GSBS Nchlterts 38342 01/31/20 Exterior stoir design. CAPITALEXPENDITUREN/—A, D9/09/2038343A CPI910020REIR GSBSPC DBA G S B S ARCHITE(G S H S PC CIA CAI CP090920 5MI0484 08/31/20 53,148.0E $3.14R00 Slit lake Clry&GSBS Architects 3834307/31/20 Selective demolition. CAPITAL EXPENOITURENG—DA WWII I CP21270543779 STALlINGS CONSTRUCTION INCSTAILINGS C0XIST CP011321 50013642 12/31/20 139,190.0E $39990.00 Seit Lake Clty&Stallings Constr 112/16/20 Selectiv,demolitlon. CAPITAL EXPENDITTT URE N/A-N/A 01/20/21 10052 43176 ENVIROCAREINC ENVIRO CARE INC 0HNI.119211-16041 11/21/21 $2,168.00 $2,168-00 ILL Corp eld&4 EP—Care,Inc 10052 06/12/20 M.11.Decontamination Materials&SIPPii EN/A.N/A 02/10/21 lAA1 CPI9109204628 GS BSPCDBAGSBSARCHITECGSBSPC DBA CAI CP021021 1.-29 11-121 $1,57400 $1,5 - S11,Lake City&GSBS Architect 38916 01/31/215e1eceNedemolltionsurvey- PREQ NG&CANSTRU MODERN R00FIN(CF'041421A 04/14/21 $31, $311 9Piaza Partin Modern Constn 20385 02/12/21 EQ damage repairz.OOFI CAPITAL EXPENDITUREN/A..N/A O7120/21 0D000108_CP21316241223 MOCA SYSTEMS M0CASYSTEMS CLCP022021 SOOI8825 O6/30/21 52850.0E $2,850.0E Sai[Lake City&MOCA Systems 10815 O6/09/21 Protect managemenC CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 20APREQ 677 11141 CP20232943629 MODERN ROOFING&CANSTRU MODERN R00FINC CAR 2011 500188>6 06/30/21 $8'106.80 $8,J06.80 349 Pura Parkin Modern COrlatn 20.418 06/11/21 EQ damage repatrs. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 20APRW A FAC20045,CP20232943621 MODERN ROOFING&C0NSTRU MODERN FRE HE M72021 SN18876 06/30/21 $3,883.20 11GA320 349 Ill—Parkin Modern Constn 20417 O6/11/21 EQ damage repatrs. OTHER MATERIAL&SL 20ERTHQUAK 085 JE0NCO202JER0W"IN/—I 1PMMAR20 JEC-2021H O1ICI OTHER MATERIAL&SL 20ERTNQUAK O85 JE0205202 T1011""2N/A.N/A JPMMAR20 IEO2052021H Dl/01/21 $313.48 OTHER MATERIAL&51,20ERTHQUA1 100 1E020C ZRSEAL—I:N/A.N/A JPMMAR20 IE02052021H 01/OS/21 1112:14 OTHER MATERIAL&SU 20ERTHQOAK RED 1E0205202 MEAL-5 N/A_N/A 'PM MAR20 IE02052021H 01J01/21 $J6.26 OTHER MATERIAL&SL 20ERTHQUAK 1.205202 CP1907035"1 9484,72762 IE02052021H 50006628 01/OI/11 $1150 5155E acilleies-2299 GRAINGER 27103/24/22 Reel corner braces. IAL&SL 20ERTHQUAK ODERN ROOFING&C0NSTRu 2004311 DJ061 01/01/21 51,3260E $1325.00 Saie Lake CltY&Modern Cl-,2060431104/06/205eal damaged plaster. OTHER MATERIAL&1120ERTHQUAK 100 J'1011202RBIRD"GN/A.N/A M JPM APR20 IE020,ROUT SW O1I012I 5525.0E OTHER MATERIAL&SL 20ERTHQUAK 100 JE0205202 RBIRD"`6:PLI-N/A JPM APR20 JE02052021H El/01/21 $985.00 OTHER MATERIAL&AL 20ERTHQUAK 100 JE0205202 RBIRO"`6:N/A..N/A JPM APR20 JE02052021H EllL/21 $945.OD OTHER MATERIAL&SIG 20ERTHQUAK IIIJE0205202 PR0CK""8 N/A..N/A JPM APR20 JE02052021H 01/01/21 $5.21 OTHER MATERIAL&SL 20ERTHQUAK 100 JE0205202 PR S 0CK""N/A.N/A JPM AP120 JE02052021H Ol/01/21 58.5E OTHER MATERIAL&SL 20ERTHQUAK S00 1E020520310106120IN/A.N/A JE05112020ADP 1E02052021H S0006809 01/01/21 111.3E 5113E Commercial LEE 1010632-0O3/25/20 E,-Quartz Socket&SOW FL36Halogen ERMATERIAL&SLIOERTHQUAK 100 JE0205202CPI15189 N/A.N/A SH17215001 JE02052021H S0002236 01/01/21 $'X20.00 51,7200E Public Service ei OTIS SH122150103/25/20 Elevatorr,p,,,,. AA IAL&SL 20ERTHgUAK N/A.N/A 13551 IA, 21 AS,00 $81.0E —Al Lig 1010496103/24/20 Acrylic Lenses. Other Professional&T�2BERTHQUAK IRA 1E02052E25IGNI 1111 N/A..N/A 1E05112020OHA JE02052021H SW O1J01/21 $356.71 Other Professional&D 20ERTHQUAK S00 1 E0205202 SIGNS RISE N/A.,SEA 1E051120MONA JE02052021H O1J01/21 $650.]9 Other Processional SE D 20ERTHQUAK 100 11-1201 SARRICAD N/A.N/A 1E05112020OHA 111212011H O1J01/21 $1,522.91 0 herProtessional&U 20ERTHQUAK 100 1 E020S202 BARRICAD N/A..N/A 1E05112020OHA JE205202111 O111/21 $4,330.06 OLherProtessional&TAN/A..N/A 05/12/2120250101 CP39096336336 ARCHIPLEX GROUP LLC ARCHIPLEX6R0UP CFO 1211 1.1.41 05/12/21 $1,593.55 $1,593,55 Flres[ati0n NO.!ARCHIPLEXGR12025.D1-003/08/21 ArchiteRuralservlces. O[herProiessional&TAN/A..N/A 05/12/2120250102 CP19096336336 ARCHIPLEXGROUP LLC ARCHIPLEX GR0UPCP051221 50016842 05/12/21 $1,639.08 $1,639.08 Firestation No.'ARCHIPLEXGR(2025.D1-IXOS/04/21 Architectural services. HLDG&N11A NGREP/20ERTHQUAK IOU 1E0205202 CP19136936200 KONE INC 11529T/042 IEO205202IN 5000J389 01/01/" $50&52 $SOBS] Slit Lake Cty&Kona Elevator 1.16E11 11/16/20 Elevatorrepairs. BLDG&HOUSINGREPl20ERTNQUAK 1E0205202CP191369 N/A,N/A 115 29 8156 6 JEQ20$3E11H 5000J552 11/Ill 21 $62691 5625-91 Slit Lake Cty&Kona Elevator 1.16E+0904/28/21 Ele,atorrepairs. Other Expenses PBEq TERSTATE BARRICADES LL 01/01/21 $110. 1110- Building ate barrio OS/31/20 Sdewalk barricades due to EQdamage,. OtherExperues PREq 9N/A,N% 01/01/21 $3,8 $3837 Saie Lake CltY&Modern Ill stn2003030903/20/20 Re ve loose plaster. Other Expenses 20APREQ I60 1E0205202 CP202329 N/A..N/A 200433E IE02052021H 50009813 01/01/21 5275.0E $L>5.00 Multiple(SLC&Motlorn Constr 200A3100A/02/20 Seal damaged plaster. Other Expenses 20APREQ 100 JE0205202 CP202,P N/A..N/A 1314 IE02E520 1150009813 01/01/21 $6-ER 5690.0E Sait Lake Clty&Modern C—B20-04-31404/16/20 Respond to aftershock CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 20APRED 617 21144 CP20232143621 MODERN ROOFING&111IT11 MODERN R001INC CP091120 1111114 09/16/21 Ell112.O1 $20$G2.00 Fischer BAR UP,Modern C—B 20344 09/03/20 EQ damage repairs. CAPITAL EXPENDITU 11 PI.N/A DS/04/21 325796 CP180A7 150063 KPF F INC K P F F I N C CAPITAL CP050421 60018535 OS/04/21 $]p6D.OD $J,4XC.0 SIX Eng Pa eking kpff 325,796,05/20/20 Engineering services. PrintingPublic Notices N/A..N/A D9/OB/212021CI-12 52672 SALT LAKE TRIBUNEINC,THE SALT LAKE TRIBU C0HDP090J2060021812 09/OS/21 $688.1D Printing-Public Notices N/AN/A 09/011112021CI-14 12671 SALT LAKE TRIBUNEINC,THE SALT LAKETRIBU F0HDP0907ZO 60021812 09/OS/21 $381.2E $381-20 Sait Lake City&The Salt Lake T.2021Ci-11106/27/21 Notice[p bidders. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 20ERTHU Al 100 3921JPER CPI910920462% GS B S PC DBA G S e S ARCHII E(G58 S PC DBA CAF CP080421 50019245 OJ/31121 $2,031 IR 52,0331E Sait Lake Ciry&GSBS Architect 39212 141 0/21 Exterior Stair Repairs. RTHIUIF DJ/31/21 52,2590E $;259.OE Sait Lake City&GS85 Architect 39352 OS/31/21 Ertedor S,air Repairs. RTHgUAK B S ARCHI m/31/z1 11,so2.20 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE N/A..N/A 09/OS/21 NV50600C LP21316241»3 MOCA SYSTEMS S TEC M0CASYSTEMS CLCP090821 5002026E 08/31/21 51,985.0E 51,985.0E Sait Lake Clty&MOCA Systems 1093E 0]/19/21 Protect managemenC CAPITAL EXPENDITURE N/A..N/A 09/O8/21 INV-ODOOCCP21316241773 MOCA SYSTEMS M0CASYSTEMS CLCP090821 5002026E 08/31/21 51,350.0E $135E.00 Salt Lake OF,A,MGCA Systems ll044 08/20/21 ProteC[managemenC CAPITALEXPENOITUREN/A..N/A 09/29/212D-431-PR CP213411 A3G29 MODERN ROOFING&C0NSTRU MODERN R00HEL CP092921 5002084E 09/29/21 SIX CVD.00 $"'E..PC Snit Lek,TV&Modem Constn 20431 07/12/21 Stair repairs. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE20ERTHQUAK 100 3953E CP39109114121 GSBSPCDBAGSBSARCHITEC,11111 OBACATCP312321 50022422 - S1121 $1,80J.20 $1,807,20 Sait Lake GUY&GSBS Architect 3953907/31/21 Exterior State Repairs. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 20ERTHQUAK IRS 3968E CP19109204628 GSBSPCDBAGSBSARCHTTE<GS BSPC OBACAF C1111311 Ill 1112 11/23/21 51,807.2E $1,80J.20 Salt Lake City&GSBS Arc R-R 396W C/31/21 Ex[edor5[air Repairs. CAPTTALEXPENDITURE20ERTHQUAK 100 39929 CP19IU9204628 GIB DBA G S B S ARCHITEC G 585 PC DBA CAF CPIl2321 50022422 11/23/21 $1,80].20 $1,801-20 Slit Lake Cty&6585 Arch-B 3992910/31/21 Extenor5[air Repairs. CAPITAL EXPENDITUREN/A..N/A I11 21 INV-OOOOC CP21316141113 MOCAS[STEMS M0CASYSTEMSCFCP120121 1.2111 11/30/21 $ 2250.0E $2,250A0 1111 FAke Cty&MOCA Systems 17 09/08/21 Project management. TU REN/A..N/A 12/01/21 IN LI/30/21 $ 1,900.0E 5190a00 Saie Lake Cley&M0C AGE seems 10/13/21 Project management. REN/A..N/A 12/01/21 IN OOOOC CPP2131624L]J3 .CA",I'M, M0CA SYSTEMS CL CP120121 50022638 TD1121 51,150.0E 11,150.0E Sait Lake CltY&MOCA Systems 1243411/12/21 PrOjecemanagemenc CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 20ERTHQUAK 100 20-454-111121111143111 MODERN ROOFING&C0NSTRU MODERN R00FIN(C1120121 ISAISA0 I1/10121 ST.,400.Al CA ITALEIIINIITU1121ERTHQUAK 100 40015 CP39109204611 GSBS PC RBA G S R S ARCHITE(GSBS PC OBA CAP C110122 IW21111 12/1'111 $901 1 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FAC20045 IDO JE02142021 NV 1829E N/A.,N/A BL02021-07447 FE JE02142022H Ol/OI22 $1,429.13 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FAC20044 683 40107 CP22376204621 GSBS PC DBA G S B S ARCHITE(G S B S PC DBA CAP CP020922 50024511 01/31/22 511,130.0E CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FAC20044 683 40204 CP22376204628 GSBSPCDBAGSBSARCHITE(GS BSPC DBA CAP CP020922 50024511 0T/31/22 :38,573.57 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 20ERTHQUAK 100 20-484-PR CP21341343629 MODERN ROOFING&C0NSTRU MODERN R00FINC CM30822 50025385 O2/28/22 89,200.00 CAPITALEXPENDITURE20ERTHQUAK 100 00000 HCP22403241773 MOCASYSTEMS MIKE SYSTEMS CL CM33022 5002602E EGGS1/32 $1,771 AD CA PITAL EXPENDITURE 20ERTHQUAK 100 00000AW:CP224E3241773 MOCA SYSTEMS M0CASYSTEMSCLCP0DE22 5002602E 03/30/22 $1,025.AT CAPITAL EXPENDITURE20ERTHQUAK 100 40244 CP19109204629 GSBSPCDBA AS BSARCHITEC G S B S PC DBA CIF CP040622 SM26179 03J31/22 113, CAPITAL EXPENDITU RE 20ERTHQUAK 100 0600040FECP22403241773 MOCASYSTEMS M0CA SYSTEMS CL CP041322A ISTA 6446 03/31/22 $950.00 CAPITAL EXPENDITU RE FAC20044 683 40332 IP121112 t14128 GSBS PC DBA G S B S ARCHITEC G S B S PC RBA CAFCP041322A 5002640J 03J31/22 551,550.6E CAPITAL EXPENDITURE HARE-44 683 A0441 CP223]620Afi28 G S B S PC OHAGS B SARCHITECGSBSPC DBA CAF CP0A1322A ITS&RE7 03/31/22 $S'.BI' CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 20ERTHQUAK 100 20-484-PR CP21341343fi29 MODERN ROOFING&C0NSTRU MODERN R00FIN(CP050422A 50327055 04/30/22 $113,381.25 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 1111//44 683 4053E 1122326204628 GSBSPCDSAGSBSARCHTTE(GSBSPCDBA CAFCP070622A 1.21.1 CA/30/22 $8,995.UP $A99600 Sait Lake City&GSBS IDRIPecs 4053003/31/225eismic repairs. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FACZOD44 683 4062E 1121371114111 GS B 111 DBA 6585 ARCHfTECGSBSPC OSACAFCPDII12A 1.21.1 06/30/22 $16,643.50 $IG,11350 Sait Lake Cty&GSBS ArchR,,B —104130/22 S,-I repairs. CAPITAL EXPENOITUREFAC20044 683 1E091922A N/A N/A Unrecorded Liabift1E091922MW 06/30/22 $30,380.98 :30,380-98 1111 Lake Cty&GSBS Architect 402B805/31/225eismic repairs. .44 N/A-N/A recorded Llabll'n1E091922MW 06/30/22 522,242.5E $27'24750 Sait Lake Clty&GSBS Aic1 1P ' 06/30/225eismic repairs. Other ProfePssloDnal&TEN/AZN/A 61111212025.El 0 CPI909633A'. GROUP LLC LEX GR0UFCP110321 50021711 11131121 $163.91 A163,91 RC 202111-117/02/21 Cons,.Does Other Professlonal&T�N/A_N/A Il/03/21 2025.01-P CPL9096336336 ARCHIPLEX GROUP LLC ARIZLIACE FCP110321 50021>]6 10/31/21 $18.21 $I8.21 Fires--No.:ARCHIPLEX GPC202I 01-O 09/IS/21 CAns[.DOcs Other Professional&TIN/A..N/A 01/05122 GETS .0IB CPI9096336336 AR CHIPLEXGROUPLLC IAIPUALEXGR0UF CP010522 50023506 ll/31/21 1113.31 $113.83 Firestatlon No.'ARCHIPLEX All 2025,01-Q12/06/2181ddmg/Permitting Other Professional&TAN/A..N/A D2/09/222025.01-0CP19096336336 ARCHIPLEX6R0UPLL< ARCHIPLEXGR0UFCP020922 500244]1 01/31/22 $102.44 $102.44 Firestetlon No.'ARCHIPLEX6Rt 2025.01-0,01/10/2281dding/Permitting Printing-PnbIk Notices FAC20045 100 2022059 52677 SALT LAKE TRIBUNEINC,THE SALT LAKE TRIBU h0H0]052022I60O3005] BE/,"'R S549.5D 1549.5E Fire Station N9 The Salt Lake D 20216SIR 06/13/22 NOHce ro bidders. CAP ITALEXPENOITUREN/A.N/A 09/14/2111TURE202180 FIRI N/A.N/A 810202L IEA41 PI.1EO9092021A1 OB/25/2I $919.2A CAPITAL EXPENDITUREN/A.N/A 0W29/211176PR1 CP39109204628 GS BSPC DBA G S B S ARCHITEC G S H S PC DBA CAI CP092921 50020814 09/29/21 $3�280.00 $3,780-00 Brine Shrimp W.GSBS ArchRect 1911608/31/21 Archilec[services. CAPITALEXPENDITURE20ERTH0DAl 110 39802 CPI9109204628 GSBSPC DBA GSBSARCHITE(GSBSPC DBA CAFCF111221 500 15 11/1]/21 53,0240E $3,0240E ne Shrimp W,6585 ArchRect 3980T O9/30/21 Archilec[serviAZ CALITAL REN/A.N/A 03/08/22 15 02/28/2, 117,2600 $12,226.0E ""Lake Acting Maddox CO lute 15 1129/21 El repairs. CAI R'—FUFHgUAK 40320� CPL9109204628 GSBS CDBAGSBCSARCHITEC G S RDS PC DBASCAF CMA3022 50025983 03/30/22 $256 $256.00 ne5hdmp Wa 6585 Architect, 40F'R E2/28/22 Architect services. CAPITALEXPENDITURE N/A-PRA 04/13/22 66E314-6 CP2019M 36299 HOGAN&ASSOCIATES CONSTRI HOGAN&ASSOCIA CP041322A 6002J505 03/31(22 $6,52400 Sorenson MCC Hogan Constru,SMCCNB.04/07/22 Provided fnttally,paid within SMCC project CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 20ERTHQUAK 100 4SE21 CPI9109204628 G S B S PC DBA G S B S ARCHITEC G S B S PC OBA CAI C-12122 5002J>i6 CS/25/22 $3,505.00 $8,505.00 Brine Shrimp YI GSBS ArchRect 4062104/30/22 AzcTU-se.NCes. EN GI NEER&ARCHITCIFAC20D44 "I 1E08D420201015DP-fN/A..N/A Engineering Fees LJE08042022A'. D7/31/22 $3,122.94 ENGINEER&ARCHITCI FAC20DA4 925 1E101A202 PP220101'.N/A..N/A Englneerng Fees PI IE 10142022AI 09/30/22 54,109.2E CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 20ERTHQUAK 100 D0000405:CP22403241773 MOCASYSTEMS M0CASYSTEMSCFCP082422 5003060E OE/24122 $Ill 85.I 51,685.0E Sait Lake City&MOCA Systems 4"1405/11/22 ProteR management. CAPITAL EXPENDITU RE 20ERTHQUAK 100 REURED0CC2403241773 M0C45YSTEM5 M0CA SYSTEMS C4 CP082422 5003060E OS/24/22 $1,060.00 51,06E-00 Sait Lake Cty&MOCA Systems 4063506J07/22 ProleRmanagement. CAPITAL EXPENOITURE20ERTNQUAK 0000017-22403241771 M0CA SYSTEMS DID A SYSTEMS CFCP082422 5003060E 08/24/22 12,600.0E 52,60E-11 Sai[Lake Cty&At CA 11111, 40252 02/12/22 Project management. RTHQUAK - OS/24/22 52,900.0E $290E.00 Saie Lake ClPy&MOCA Systems Oe/04/22 Pe0jec[management. C45YSTEMS OF CP082422 E FAC20044 683 40980R C 326204628 G S B SPCDeAG S B S ARCHITE(GSBS PC DBA CAF CP090822 50031125 08/31/22 $6,816.27 $8,816.2J Saie take CltY&GSBS Arcbltect40980ft O8/16/225eismic repairs. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FAC20044 683 41I65 CP22376204628 GSBSPCDBAGSBSARCHITECGSBSPCDBACAFCP110222A 50032602 10/31/22 58,380.5E $8}80.50 Sait take Ctty&GSBS Archttecc 41165 OBI""Seismic repairs. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FAC2004A 683 41312 111237120121 GSBSPCDBAIIIIARCHITEE G S B S PC DBA CAI CP110222A 5W32602 10/31/22 $1,932.00 $1,932.OE Sait Lake OIL IS 6585 Architect 413.209/30J22 Sekmtc repairs. ENGINEER&ARCHITCi FALMUMS All JE080 11010111P IN/A..N/A Engineering Fees2:1EEEGI C12AI 07/31/22 $1,634,11 ENGINEER&ARCHITER FAC20045 975 JE1014202PP220101,N/A..N/A Engineering Fees PI1E10142022AI 09/30/22 $3,081.55 PORFAIRS,Notices FAC20045 100 2022CI-61 12671 SALT LAKE TRIBUNE INC,THE SALT LAKE TRIBU h OHO8012022r60D30833 08/03/22 $119.50 $549.5E Fire Station N9 The 5,It Lake T.20216RE!06/13/22 Notice to bidder,-rebid. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 20ERTHQUAK S00 41092 CP19101204628 G S B S PC DBA G 5 H 5 ARCHITEC G 5 H 5 PC DBA CAI CP092822 SOD31549 09/28/22 $2835.OR $2,835-00 Brine Shrimp VA G565 ArchRect 4109708/31/22 Architectservices. #95),312.94 $429,331.35 10 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative Attachment #$ Quote Number:�QUOTE!1957361 Quote Name:Salt Lake City-Public Safety Radio Billing Address: Equipment Quote Created By: SALT LAKE CITY CORP Quote Date:2022-11-17 Walter Whately 451 S STATE ST RM 235 Expiration Date:2022-12-09 Area Sales Manager Contract Name:18015-STATE OF UTAH 800 MHZ AR- SALT LAKE CITY UT,84111 3941 wafter.whately@motorolasolutions.com (520)457-8604 Customer:SALT LAKE CITY CORP Currency:USD 4 9 B 6 Fire Mobiles(Utah Bundle Package,$900 APXT'6500/Enh Series Trade-in Included) 1 M25URS9PW1BN APX6500 ENHANCED 7/800 MHZ MOBILE. 122 $3,253.00 $396,866.00 74.67% $2,428.91 $824.09 $100,538.9 la G832AD ADD:SPKR 7.5W WTR RST APEX. 122 $67.00 $8,174.00 27.00% $18.09 $48.91 $5,967.02 1b GA00580AA ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 122 $495.00 $60,390.00 47,00% $232r65 $262.35 $32,006.7 lc G51AU ENT:SMARTZONE OPERATION APX6500. 122 $1,320.00 $161,040.00 47.00% $620AC $699.60 $85,351.2 Sd G67DT ADD:REMOTE MOUNT E5 APXM. 122 $327.00 $39,894.0 47.00% $153.69 $173.31 $21,143.82 Se IG78AT ENH:3 YEAR ESSENTIAL SVC. 122 $176.00 $21,472.00 0.00% $0.0 $176.00 $21,472.0 if GA01606AA ADD:NO GPS/WI-FI ANTENNA NEEDED. 122 $0.00 $0.0 0.00% $0.0 $0.00 $0.0 lg G444AH ADD:APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE. 122 $0.00 $0.0 0.00% $0.0 $0.00 $0.0 lh G335AW ADD:ANT 1/4 WAVE 762-870MHZ. 122 $15.00 $1,830.00 47.00% $7.0 $7.95 $969.9 li G806BL ENH:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OP APX. 122 $567.00 $69,174.0 47,00% $266.4 $300.51 $36,662.22 1j GA01670AA ADD:APX ES CONTROL HEAD. 122 $717.00 $87,474.0 47.00% $336.9 $380.01 $46,361.22 1k W22BA ADD:STD PALM MICROPHONE APX. 122 $79.00 $9,638.00 47.00% $37.1 $41.871 $5,108.1 lI Q629AK ENH:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 122 $523.00 $63,806.00 43,00% $22,L89 $298.11 $36,369.42 lm G361AH ENH:P25 TRUNKING SOFTWARE APX. 122 $330.00 $40,260.00 47.00% $155.1C $174.90 $21,337.8 Fire Mobiles for FSA(Utah Bundle APX'"6500/Enh Series Package,$900 Trade-In Included) 2 M25URS9PW18N APX6500 ENHANCED 7/800 MHZ MOBILE. 15 $3,253.00 $48,795.00 74.67% $2,428.91 $824.09 $12,361.35 2a G832AD ADD:SPKR 7.5W WTR RST APEX. 15 $67.00 $1,005.00 27.00% $18.09 $48.91 $733.65 2b G66BF ADD:DASH MOUNT 02 APXM. 15 $138.00 $2,070.00 27.00% $37.26 $100.74 $1,511.1 2c GA00580AA ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 15 $495.00 $7,425.0 47.00% $232.6 $262.35 $3,935.25 2d G51AU ENH:SMARTZONE OPERATION APX6500. 15 $1,320.00 $19,800.0 47,00% $620AC $699.60 $10,494.0 2e G78AT ENH:3 YEAR ESSENTIAL SVC. 15 $176.00 $2,640.0 0.00% $0.0 $176.00 $2,640.0 2f GA01606AA ADD:NO GPS/WI-FI ANTENNA NEEDED. 15 $0.00 $0.0 0.00% $0.0C $0.00 $0.0 2g GA00804AA ADD:APX 02 CH(GREY). 15 $541.00 $8,11S.0c 27.00% $146.07 $394.93 $5,923.95 2h G444AH ADD:APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE. 15 $0.00 $0.0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.0 2i G335AW ADD:ANT 1/4 WAVE 762-870MHZ. 15 $15.00 $225.00 47.00% $7.05 $7.95 $119.25 2j G806BL ENH:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OP APX. 15 $567.00 $8,505.0 47.00% $266.4 $300.51 $4,507.65 2k W226A ADD:STD PALM MICROPHONE APX. 15 $79.00 $1,185.0 47.00% $37A3 $41.87 $628.05 11 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative 21 G843AH ADD:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 15 $523.0 $7,845.0 47.00% $245.8 $277.1 $4,157.85 2m G361AH ENH:P25 TRUNKING SOFTWARE APX. 15 $330,0 $4,950.0 47,00% $155.1 $174.9 $2,623.5C Fire Portables with AES Encryption(Utah APXT"6000 Series Bundle Package,$700 Trade-In Included) 3 H98UCD9PW5BN APX60007/800 MHZ MODEL 1.5 13 $3,213.0 $41,769. 64.79° $2,081.5 $1,131.4 $14,708.33 3a QA05570AA ALT:LI-ION IMPRES 2 IP68 3400 MAH. 13 $110.0 $1,430.0 27,00% $29.7 $80.3 $1,043.9C 3b Q361AR ADD:P259600 BAUD TRUNKING. 13 $330.0 $4,290.0 43.00% $141.9 $188.1 $2,445.3C 3c H38BT ADD:SMARTZONE OPERATION. 13 $1,320.0 $17,160. 43.00% $567.6 $752.4 $9,781.2C 3d Q58AL ADD:3Y ESSENTIAL SERVICE. 13 $121.0 $1,573.0 0.00% $0.0 $121.0 $1,573.00 3e QA00580AC ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 13 $495.0 $6,435.0 43.00% $212.8 $282.1 $3,667.95 3f QA01768AA ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 13 $83.0 $1,079.0 27.00% $22.4 $60.5 $787.67 3g Q806BM ADD:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OPERATION. 13 $567.0 $7,371.0 43.00% $243.8 $323.1 $4,201.4i 3h Q629AK ENH:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 13 $523.0 $6,799.0 43.00° $224.8 $298.1 $3,875.43 4 NNTN8863A CHARGER,SINGLE-UNIT,IMPRES 2,3A,100 13 $169.5 $2,204.2 26.81% $45.4 $124.1 $1,613.3C Standalone Items 5 PMNN4486A BATT IMPRES 2 LOON R IP67 3400T. 13 $179.3 $2,330.9 27.00% $48.41 $130.8S $1,701.57 6 PMMN4099CL AUDIO ACCESSORY-REMOTE SPEAKER 13 $142,56 $1,853.2E 27,00% $38,49 $104.0 $1,352.97 Fire Portables Non-XE(Utah Bundle APX'"6000 Series Package,$700 Trade-In Included) 7 H98UCD9PW5BN APX60007/800 MHZ MODEL 1.5 131 $3,213.0 $420,903.0 64.79% $2,081.5 $1,131.41 $148,214.71 7a G843AH ADD:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 131 $5210C $68,513.0C 47.00% $245.8 $277AS $36,311.85 7b QA05570AA ALT:LI-ION IMPRES 2 IP68 3400 MAH. 131 $110,OC $14,410. 27,00% $29.7 $803C $10,519.3C 7c Q361AR ADD:P259600 BAUD TRUNKING. 131 $330.0 $43,230. 43.00% $141.9 $188.1c $24,641.1C 7d H38BT ADD:SMARTZONE OPERATION. 131 $1,320.0 $172,920.0 43.00% $567.6 $752.4C $98,564.4C 7e Q58AL ADD:3Y ESSENTIAL SERVICE. 131 $121.0c $IS,851.00 0.00% $0.0 $121.00 $15,851.00 7f QA00580AC ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 131 $495.0 $64,845. 43.00% $212.8 $282.IE $36,961.65 7g QA01768AA ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 131 $83.00 $10,873. 27.00% $22.41 $60.5s $7,937.25 7h IQ806BM ADD:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OPERATION. 131 $567.0 $74,277. 43.00% $243.8 $323AS $42,337.85 8 NNTN8863A CHARGER,SINGLE-UNIT,IMPRES 2,3A,100 131 $169.5f $22,212.3E 26,81% $45.4 $124.IC $16,2WAC Standalone Items 9 PMNN4486A BATT IMPRES 2 LIION R IP67 3400T. 131 $179.3C $23,488.3 27.00% $48.41 $130,8S $17,1463S 10 PMMN4099CL AUDIO ACCESSORY-REMOTE SPEAKER 131 $142.56 $18,675.3E 27.00% $38.49 $104.0 $13,633.17 Fire Portables XE for W ild Fire Ops.(Utah APXT"6000 Series Bundle Package,$700 Trade-In Included) 11 H98UCD9PW5BN APX60007/800 MHZ MODEL 1.5 36 $3,2130 $115,668.0 62.79% $2,017.3 $1,195.6 $43,044.12 lla G843AH ADD:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 36 $523.00 $18,828.0C 47.00% $245.8 $277AS $9,978.84 11b Q361AR ADD:P259600 BAUD TRUNKING. 36 $330.00 $11,880.0c 41,00% $1353C $194.7C $7,009.2C llc QA02006AA ENH:APX6000XE RUGGED RADIO. 36 $880.0 $31,680.0C 41.00% $360.8C $519.2C $18,691.2C 11d Q58AL ADD:3Y ESSENTIAL SERVICE. 36 $121.0 $4,356.0 0.00% $0.0 $121,OC $4,356.00 Ile QA00580AC ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 36 $495.0 $17,820.CIC 41.00% $202.9 $292.0 $10,513.8C llf QA01768AA ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 36 $83.00 $2,988.0 27.00% $22.41 $60.5C $2,181.24 11g H38BT ADD:SMARTZONE OPERATION. 36 $1,320.0 $47,520.CIC 41.00% $541.2 $778.8 $28,036.8C llh QA01427AB ALT:IMPACT GREEN HOUSING. 36 $28.0 $1,008.0 27.009/ $7,5q $20.4z $735.84 11i Q806BM ADD:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OPERATION. 36 $567.0 $20,412,OC 41.00% $232.4 $334.5 $12,043.0E 12 PMNN4547A BATT IMPRES 2 LIION TIA4950 R IP68 36 $203.0 $7,308.0 27.00% $54.8 $148.IC $5,334.84 13 NNTN8863A CHARGER,SINGLE-UNIT,IMPRES 2,3A,100 36 $169.51 $6,10TIE 26.81% $45.4q $124.1 $4,467.6C Standalone Items 14 jPMMN4107C AUDIO ACCESSORY-REMOTE SPEAKER 36 $594,Oq $21,384.DC 27,00% $160,3 $433.6 $15,610.32 12 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative FLASHport Series Flashesfor Fire 15 T8010A ANALOG 3600 TRUNKING. 1 §$$721.00 $0.0 0.00% $0.0 $0.0 $0.00 15a GA00894AB ENH:ANALOG 3600 TRUNKING TO 9600 1 $721.0 27.00% $194.6 $526.3 $526.33 15b UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.0 0.00% $0.0 $0.0 $0.00 15c GA00580AC ENH:UPGRADE TO TDMA. 1 $569.0 27.00% $153.6 $415.3 $415.37 FLASHport Series Flashesfor Fire 16 T7905A ANALOG 3600 TRUNKING. 1 $0.0 0.00% $0.0 $0.0 $0.00 16a QA03216AB ENH:ANALOG 3600 TRUNKING TO 9600 1 $721.0 $721.0 27.00% $194.6 $526.3 $526.33 16b JUA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.0 $0.0 0.00% $0.oc $0.0 $0.00 16c QA00580AE ENH:TDMA OPERATION. 1 $569.0 $569.0 27.00% $153.6 $415.3 $415.37 FLASHport Series Flashesfor Fire 17 T7697A DIGITAL SMARTZONE. 1 $0.0c $0.00 0.00% $0.0c $0.0c $0.00 17a UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.0 $0,00 0.00° $O,OC $0.0c $0.00 17b GA00580AC ENH:UPGRADE TO TDMA. 4 $569.0 $2,276.0 27.00% $153.6 $415.3 $1,661.4E FLASHport Series Flashesfor Fire 18 T7664A DIGITAL SMARTZONE. 1 $O.0 $0.00 0.00% $0.0 $Owoc $0.00 18a QA01768AD ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 13 $95.0c $1,235.0 27.00% $25.65 $69.3 $901.5E 18b UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.0 $0.00 0.00`Y $0.00 $0.0c $0.00 18c QA00580AE ENH:TDMA OPERATION. 13 $569.0 $7,397.0 27.00% $153.6 $415.3 $5,399.81 FLASHport Series Flashesfor Fire 19 T7664A DIGITAL SMARTZONE. 1 $0.0 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.0c $0.00 19a QA01768AD ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 20 $95.00 $1,900.0c 27.00% $2S.65 $69.3 $1,387.00 19b UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.0 $0,00 0.00% $0.00 $0.0c $0.00 19c QA00580AE ENH:TDMA OPERATION. 20 $569w(K $11,380,OC 27.00% $153.6 $415.3 $8,307.4 FLASHport Series Flashesfor Fire 20 T7664A DIGITAL SMARTZONE. 1 $0.0c $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 20a QA01768AD ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 8 $95.0c $760.0 27.00% $25.65 $69.3E $554.8C 20b jQA00580AE ENH:TDMA OPERATION. 8 $569.0 $4,552.00 27.00% $153.6 $415.3 $3,322.9E FLASHport Series Flashesfor Fire 21 T7664A DIGITAL SMARTZONE. 1 $0.0c $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.0c $0.00 21a QA01768AD ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 10 $95.0c $950.0 27.00% $25w65 $69.3E $693.5C 21b UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.0c $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.0c $0.00 21c CA00580AE ENH:TDMA OPERATION. 10 $569.0 $5,690.0 27D0% $153.6 $415.3 $4,153.7C FLASHport Series Flashesfor Fire 22 T8012A 9600 OR 3600 SINGLE SYSTEM DIGITAL 1 $O,OC $0.00 0,00% $0.00 $O,OC $0,00 22a UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.0 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.0c $0.00 22b GA00S80AC ENH:UPGRADE TO TDMA. 8 $569.00 $4,552.0 27.00% $153.6 $415.3 53,322.9E KVL 5000 Encryption Keyloader for Police 23 T8476B KVL 5000. 1 $6,000.0 $6,000.0 27.00% $1,620.0 $4,380.0 $4,380.00 23a CA00182AW ADD:AES ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE. 1 $0.0 $0.00 0.00% $0.0c $0.0c $0.00 23b CA03467AA ADD:NORTH AMERICA MICRO USB 1 $0.0c $0,00 0.00% $0.0c $0.0c $0.00 23c CA03358AA ADD:ASTRO 25 MODE. 1 $Owoc $0.00 0.00% $0.0c $0.0c $0.00 24 HKN6182B CABLE KEYLOADING ADAPTER CGAI. 2 $196.0 $392.00 20.00% $39.2 $156.8 $313.6C 25 WPLN6904A ASSY:KIT,KEYLOAD CABLE. 2 $118.8 $237.6C 27.00% $32.0 $86.71 $173.44 26 PMNN4549A BATT IMPRES 2 LIION 2925T. 2 $80.0c $160.0 27.00% $21.6C $58.4 $116.8C 27 TKN8531C CABLE,KEYLOAD. 2 $311.4 $622.8 20.00% $62.2 $249.1 $498.3C After Market Encryption Upgrades AES for Police 28 T7936A JAPX UCM UPGRADE CD. 1 $57.5C $57.5 26.991 $15.5 $41.9 $41.9E 28a CA00182AR ADD:AES ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE. 100 $696.0 $69,600,Gq 27.001 $187.94 $508.0 $50,808.0C 13 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative After Market Encryption Upgrades AES for Police 29 T7936A APX UCM UPGRADE CO. 1 $57.50 $57.50 26.99% $15.52 $41.9E $41.9E 29a CA00182AR ADD:AES ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE. 100 $696.00 $69,600.GC 27.00% $187.92 $508.0E $50,808.0C After Market Encryption Upgrades AES for Police 30 T7936A APX UCM UPGRADE CD. 1 $57.50 $57.50 26,99% $15r52 $41.9E $41.9E 30a CA00182AR ADD:AES ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE. 65 $696.00 $45,240.GC 27.00% $197.92 $508.OE $33,025.2C Standalone Items 31 RMNS070A DESKTOP MIC(GCAI). 15 $185.76 $2,786.4 27.00% $50.16 $135.6C $2,034.00 32 7012074001 BRACKET,BRACKET,WORKSTATION. 30 $3.6 $108.0 20.00% $0.72 $2.88 $86.4C 33 NNTN8844A CHARGER,MULTI-UNIT,IMPRES 2,6-DISP, 43 $1,420.2 $61,068.6 27.00% $383.4 $1,036.7 $44,580.25 Police Mobileswith AES(Utah Bundle APX' 6500/Enh Series Package,$900 Trade-In Included) 34 M25URS9PWIBN APX6500 ENHANCED 7/800 MHZ MOBILE. 568 $3,253.0 $1,847,704.0 74.67% $2,428.93 $824.0C $468,083.12 34a G66BF ADD:DASH MOUNT O2 APXM. 568 $13&0C $78,384.GC 27.00% $37.26 $100.74 $57,220.32 34b GA00S80AA ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 568 $495.00 $281,160.0 47.00% $232.61 $262.31 $149,014.8C 34c G51AU ENH:SMARTZONE OPERATION APX6500. 568 $1,320.0 $749,760.0 47.00% $620.4 $699.6 $397,372.8C 34d G78AT ENH:3 YEAR ESSENTIAL SVC. 568 $176.Oq $99,968.CIC 0.00% $0.0 $176.0 $99,968.00 34e GA01606AA ADD:NO GPS/WI-FI ANTENNA NEEDED. 568R$3 0 $0.0 0.00% $0.0 $0.0 $0.00 34f B18CR ADD:AUXILIARY SPKR 7.5 WATTAPX. 5680 $37,488. 47.00% $31.0 $34.9 $19,868.64 34g G843AH ADD:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 5680 $297,064.0 47.00% $245.8 $277.1 $157,443.92 34h GA00804AA ADD:APX 02 CH(GREY). 568 .0 $307,288.0 27.00% $146.0 $394.9 $224,320.24 34i G444AH ADD:APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE. 568 .0 $0.0 0.00% $0.0 $0.0 $0.00 34j G335AW ADD:ANT 1/4 WAVE 762-870MHZ. 568 .0 $8,520.0 47.00° $7.05 $7.95 $4,515.6C 34k G806BL ENH:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OP APX. 568 .0 $322,056.0 47,00% $266.4 $300.5 $170,689.6E 341 W22BA ADD:STD PALM MICROPHONE APX. 5680 $44,872. 47.00% $37.1 $41.8 $23,782.1E 34m G361AH ENH:P25 TRUNKING SOFTWARE APX. 568 .0 $187,440.0 47.00% $155.1 $174.9 $99,343.2C Police Mobileswith AES(Utah Bundle APX11 6500/En Series Package,$900 Trade-In Included) 35 M25URS9PW16N APX6500 ENHANCED 7/800 MHZ MOBILE. 44 .0 $143,132.0 74.67% $2,428.9 $824.0 $36,259.9E 35a G90AC ADD:NO MICROPHONE NEEDED APX. 44 .0 $0.0 0.00% $0.0 $0.0 $0.00 35b G72AD ADD:APX 03 HANDHELD CH. 44 .0 $45,804. 27.00% $281.0 $759.9 $33,436.92 35c GA00580AA ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 44 .0 $21,780. 4700% $2316E $262.3 $11,543.4C 35d G51AU ENH:SMARTZONE OPERATION APX6500. 44 $1,320.0 $58,080,GC 47.00% $620AC $699.6t $30,782.4C 35e G67DR ADD:REMOTE MOUNT O3 APXM. 44 $327.0 $14,388.0C 27.00% $88.29 $238.7 $10,503.24 35f G78AT ENH:3 YEAR ESSENTIAL SVC. 44 $176.0 $7,744.0 0.00% $0.0 $176.0 $7,744.00 35g GA01606AA ADD:NO GPS/WI-FI ANTENNA NEEDED. 44 $0.0 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.0 $0.00 35h B18CR ADD:AUXILIARY SPKR 7.5 WATTAPX. 44 $66.00 $2,904.0 47.00% $31.02 $34.9 $1,539.12 35i G843AH ADD:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 44 $523.0 $23,012.GC 47.00% $245.83 $277.1 $12,196.3E 35j G444AH ADD:APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE. 44 $0.0 $0.0 0.00% $0.00 $0.0c $0,00 35k G335AW ADD:ANT 1/4 WAVE 762-870MHZ. 44 $15,OC $660.0 47.00% $7.05 $7.9 $349.8C 351 G806BL ENH:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OP APX. 44 $567.00 $24,948. 47.00% $266.4S $300.51 $13,222.44 35m G361AH ENH:P25 TRUNKING SOFTWARE APX. 44 $330.00 $14,520.CIC 47.00% $155.1 $174.9C $7,695.6C Police Portables with AES(Utah Bundle APXT'6000 Series Package,$700 Trade-In Included) 36 H98UCF9PW6BN APX6000700/800 MODEL 2.5 PORTABLE. 628 $3,595.0 $2,257,660.0 63.47% $2,281.8C $1,313.2C $824,689.6C 36a QA05570AA ALT:LI-ION IMPRES 2 IP68 3400 MAH. 628 $110.0 $69,080.GC 27,00% $29.7 $803C $50,428.4C 36b Q361AR ADD:P259600 BAUD TRUNKING. 628 $330.0 $207,240.0 44.00% $145.2 $184.8 $116,054.4C 36c H38BT ADD:SMARTZONE OPERATION. 628 $1,320.0 $828,960.0 44.00% $580.8 $739.2 $464,217.6C 36d Q58AL ADD:3Y ESSENTIAL SERVICE. 1 628 1 $121.Oq $75,988. 0.005, $0.0 $121.Oq $75,988.00 14 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative 36e QA00580AC ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 628 $495.0 $310,860.0 44.00% $217.8 $277.20 $174,081.6C 361' Q806BM ADD:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OPERATION. 628 $567,CK $356,076.0 44,00% $249AE $317.54 $199,402.5E 369 H122BR ALT:1/4 WAVE 7/8 STUBBY(NAR6595). 628 $26.00 $16,328.0C 27.00% $7.02 $18.9 $11,919.44 36h Q629AK ENH:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 628 $523.00 $328,444.0 44.00% $230.1 $292.8 $183,928.64 37 NNTN8863A CHARGER,SINGLE-UNIT,IMPRES 2,3A,100 628 $169.5 $106,483.6E 26.81% $45.46 $124.1 $77,934.8C Standalone Items 38 PMNN4486A BATT IMPRES 2 ILION R IP673400T. 628 $179.3 $112,600.4 27.00% $48.4 $130.81 $82,198.92 39 NTN2570C ASSEMBLY ACCESSORY WIRELESS ACCY KIT 628 $350.4E $220,088.8E 27.00% $94.6 $255.81 $160,667.52 40 PMMN4099CL AUDIO ACCESSORY-REMOTE SPEAKER 628 $142.56 $89,527.6E 27.00% $38.4 $104.0 $65,355.9E 41 HLN6875A BELT CLIP 3INCH, 628 $14.04 $8,817.1 26,99% $3.71 $10.2 $6,437.00 After Market Encryption Upgrades AES for legacy Fire Radios 42 T7936A APX UCM UPGRADE CD. 1 $57.50 $57.5C 26.99% $15.52 $41.9 $41.9£ 42a CA00182AR ADD:AES ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE. 42 $696.00 $29,232. 27.00% $187.9 $508.0 $21,339.3E Radio Management for loading flashes APX`"Radio Management and programming radios(tethered) 43 T7914A RADIO MANAGEMENT ONLINE. 1 $0.0 $0.0 0.00% $0.0 $0.0 $0.00 43a UA00049AA ADD:RADIO MANAGEMENT LICENSES 1622 $110.0 $178,420.0 27.00% $29.7 $O.0 $0.00 44 PSVO1S01987A RADIO MANAGEMENT(RM)TRAINING 2 $1,500.0 $3,000.0 0.00% $0.0 $0.0 $0.00 45 Incentive .Additional trade-in incentive of 1 -$311,400.0 -$311,400.0 D.DO% $0.0 -$311,400.0 -$311,400.00 Net Total $5,598,775.01 The Utah BUNDLE PACKAGE PRICING includes$900 Trade-In for Mobile Radios and$700 Trade-In for Portable Radios and is including in the Estimated Tax $0.00 pricing discount line item.We have given an extra$200,1000+Volume Trade-In as well(Item 43). Estimated Freight $0.00 Quote and Pricing valid until December 30,2022 and contingent on$5,000,000.00 or more purchased by this date Grand Total $5,598,775.01 Pricing includes all discounts and trade-in incentives on a one for one trade in basis and trade in concession Motorola Contact: Walter Whately,Area Sales Manager,520-457-8604,walter.whately@motorolasolutions.com 15 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative Attachment *3 CONFIDENTIAL From: Chief Mike Brown To: City Council Re: Hiring Bonuses and Retention Bonuses —Salt Lake City Police Department Summary: The Salt Lake City Police Department(SLCPD) is committed to recruiting the best and brightest individuals to join its team to help provide a safe and thriving community.Today,law enforcement agencies across the country continue experiencing challenges recruiting and hiring qualified police candidates.To that end,the department is seeking funding to provide a hiring bonus of$1o,000 to lateral officers with a two-year commitment to employment with the department.Additionally,the department is seeking funding to provide a $5,000 bonus to qualified new SLCPD officers who have graduated from a self-sponsored, state-certified Utah Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) academy. Finally,the department is seeking funding to provide a one-time retention bonus for current sworn members. Current Staffing: The police department currently has 47 sworn vacancies out of its authorized staffing level of 597.The total number of resignations and retirements for FY 23 is currently at 23. If that current pace 46 employees per month) continues through the end of the fiscal year,the department predicts losing 55 total sworn employees by June 30, 2023. The department is proposing a multifaceted approach to improving sworn staffing utilizing overtime funding to ensure the department can provide, maintain and improve call responsiveness to community needs. While many other law enforcement jurisdictions have offered new hiring or lateral hiring bonuses greater than $15,000,the Salt Lake City Police Department is approaching funding this bonus using ARPA funding to reduce impact on the city's general fund. The department recognizes the competition that exists nationally to recruit officers with hiring bonuses and may need to reevaluate its approach. 16 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative Hiring Bonus: The lateral hiring bonus would provide greater incentive for a person who is law enforcement certified to leave their current department and to seek employment with the SLCPD. Hiring lateral officers will allow the department to reduce its sworn vacant positions faster than relying on a new hire recruit class.A lateral officer can be patrolling solo within approximately io-12 weeks of hire.Whereas, a new hire,with no law enforcement certification,will be patrolling solo at least 40-42 weeks from the start of their recruit class start date. Lateral Hiring bonus -Tiered rate based on length of commitment *year commitment 2 Bonus year 1 $ 10,000 Pensionable cost $ 4,680 * of officers estimated to hire 25 Total Cost $ 367,000 ARPA Funded $ 200,000 General Fund FY 23 $ 83,500 General Fund FY 24-if approved for ongoing funding $ 83,500 If a lateral officer leaves employment with the SLCPD prior to the end of the employment commitment,there would be a requirement to repay the bonus prorated for time of commitment that was met.A proposal for repayment would be worked on jointly with the City's Human Resources and City Attorney's Office. For each new lateral hire,the department could likely save $1682 per week,which is currently being spent to backfill those patrol shifts using overtime. The department is also proposing providing a hiring bonus to qualified candidates who graduate from a self- sponsored, state certified satellite police academy.These candidates must meet all SLCPD hiring standards. This would provide $5000 to the qualified applicant. Post Academy Recruit Bonus Hiring Bonus $ 5,000 Pensionable Cost $ 2,340 Estimated number of hires 5 17 Salt Lake City FY 2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Total Cost $ 36,700 ARPA Funded $ 36,700 General Fund $ - The department is currently accelerating and prioritizing hiring but key to maintaining staffing stability is to slow the department's separation rate. Providing a retention bonus would provide further incentive to current sworn employees so the department could keep sworn FTE at a higher level than is currently being experienced.A retention bonus would be offered to most sworn employee excluding any officers who was hired and accepted a bonus and long-term military until those employees return to their regular duties within the department, if within the retention period.The retention bonus would be offered to the employee on their hiring date anniversary.This would stagger retention periods over the course of a calendar year, splitting it over two fiscal years and thereby preventing the potential of a mass calendar year retirement. Retention bonus-Tiered rate based on length of commitment #year commitment 1 2 Total Bonus $ 5,000 $ 8,000 Pensionable Cost $ 2,340 $ 3,744 # of officers estimated 16 513 529 Total Cost $ 117,440 $ 6,024,672 $ 6,142,112 ARPA Funded $ 117,440 $ 4,104,000 $ 4,221,440 General Fund FY 23 $ - $ 96o,336 $ 960,336 General Fund FY 24-if approved as an ongoing program $ $ 96o,336 $ 960,336 Total Retention and Hiring Program Cost Program Total Cost Estimate ARPA GF- 23 GF- 24 Lateral Hiring $ 367,000 $ 200,000 $ 83,500 $ 83,500 18 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *5 Number/NameInitiative Academy Pairing $ 36,700 $ 36,700 $ - $ - Retention $ 6,142,112 $ 4,221,440 $ 960,336 $ 96o,336 Total $ 6,545,812 $ 4,458,140 $ 1,043,836 $ 1,043,836 The department has carefully evaluated these proposals using our best educated judgement to predict future hiring.There is no guarantee to the estimated number of new hires. I look forward to further discussion with you about these matters. Respectfully submitted, Chief Mike Brown Salt Lake City Police Department 19 Impact Fees - Summary Data pulled 12/28/2022 Unallocated Budget Amounts:by Major Area Area Cost Center Un Cash ted Notes: Cash Impact fee-Police 8484001 $ 989,579 A Impact fee-Fire 8484002 $ 1,479,222 0 Impact fee-Parks 8484003 $ 12,150,505 c Impact fee-Streets 8484005 $ 4,182,237 D $ 18,801,543 F=A+S+c+D Expiring Amounts:by Major Area,by Month QuarterCalendar Fiscal Total Month 202207(Ju12022) 2023Q1 $ $ $ $ $ 202208(Aug2022) 2023Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202209(Sep2022) 2023Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202210(Oct2o22) 2023Q2 $ $ $ - $ - $ M N 202212(Dec2022) 2023Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202301(Jan2023) 2023Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202302(Feb2023) 2023Q3 $ $ $ $ $ 202303(Mar2023) 2023Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 202304(Apr2023) 2023Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202305(May2023) 2023Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202306(Jun2023) 2023Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202307(Ju12023) 2024Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202308(Aug2023) 2024Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202309(Sep2023) 2024Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202310(Oct2023) 2024Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - N 202311(Nov2023) 2024Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ C) 202312(Dec2023) 2024Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202401(Jan2024) 2024Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202402(Feb2024) 2024Q3 $ $ $ $ $ 202403(Mar2024) 2024Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202404(Apr2024) 2024Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202405(May2024) 2024Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202406(Jun2024) 2024Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202407(Ju12024) 2025Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 202408(Aug2024) 2025Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202409(Sep2024) 2025Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202410(Oct2024) 2025Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - u1 202411(Nov2024) 2025Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ N 202412(Dec2024) 2025Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202501(Jan2025) 2025Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202502(Feb2025) 2025Q3 $ $ $ $ 132,793 $ 132,793 202503(Mar2025) 2025Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ 24,194 $ 24,194 202504(Apr2025) 2025Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ 260,338 $ 260,338 202505(May2025) 2025Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ 277,473 $ 277,473 202506(Jun2025) 2025Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ 28,350 $ 28,350 202507(Ju12025) 2026Q1 $ $ $ $ 121,823 $ 121,823 202508(Aug2025) 2026Q1 $ $ $ $ 194,127 $ 194,127 C) 202509(Sep2025) 2026Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ 215,520 $ 215,520 N 202510(Oct2025) 2026Q2 $ $ $ 679,086 $ 135,760 $ 814,847 LL 202511(Nov2025) 2026Q2 $ $ $ 987,055 $ 1,256,504 $ 2,243,559 202512(Dec2025) 2026Q2 $ $ $ 26,719 $ 113,748 $ 140,467 Total,Currently Expiring through Dec 2025 $ 0 $ - $ 1,692,860 $ 2,760,629 $ 4,453,490 Impact Fees Data pulled 12/28/2022 AAA BBB CCC DDD=W-BBB-CCC UnAllocated Allocation Budget Allocation YTD Allocation Remaining Budget Police Amended Encumbrances Expenditures Appropriation Amount Sum of Police Allocation Sum of Police Allocation Sum of Police Allocation Remaining Description Cost Cen Budget Amended Encumbrances Sum of Police Allocation YTD I Appropriation 9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 $ - Imp aa fee-Police 8484001 $ - Bridge W Backman 8418005 $ - $ - $ - Impact fee-StreetsWestside 8484005 $ - $ - $ Impact fee-Fire 8484002 $ Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 $ - Gladiola Street W6001 $ - $ - $ Public Safety Building Repicmn 8405005 $ 14,068 $ 14,068 $ - $ 0 Eastside Precint 6419201 $ 21,639 $ - $ - $ 21,639 Police Im act Fee Refunds 8421102 $ 237,606 $ $ - $ 237,606.45 Grand Total $ 273 314 14 O68 259,246 Allocation Budget Allocation Allocation Remaining Fire Amended Encumbrances YTD Expenditures A r0 riation Fire Im act Fee ACM' y Sum of Fire Allocation Sum of Fire Allocation Sum of Fire Allocation Remaining Description Co.Con Budget Amended Encumbrances Sum of Fire Allocation YTD E. Appropria[ion Fire'sConaultant'sContmot 184192021$ 3,079 $ 3,021 $ - 58.00 FY20 FireTminingFac. 8420431 $ - $ - $ Grand Total 3,079 3 021 - 58.00 s4aaooz e Allocation Budget Allocation Allocation Remaining Parks Amended Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Appropriation Parks Im aci Fee A,tMry7 y Sum of Parks Allocation Sum of Parks Allocation Sum of Parks Allocation Remaining Description Cost Coo Budget Amended Encumbrances Sum of Parks Allocation YID 1 Appropriation Emigration Open Space ACQ 8422423 $ 700,000 $ - $ 707,192 $ (7,192) JR Boat Ram 8420144 $ 3,33J $ - $ 3,33] $ - FisherCarnageHouse 8420130 $ 261,18; $ - $ 261,187 $ - Fork'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 $ 2,638 $ 2,596 $ - $ 42 [wide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 $ 23,262 $ 23,000 $ - $ 262 Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 $ 16,959 $ 1,705 $ 14,8]3 $ 381 Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 $ 1,056 $ - $ - $ 1,056 Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 $ 1,570 $ - $ - $ 1,n° 12,150,505 Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 $ 2,946 $ - $ - $ 2,946 ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 $ 6,398 $ - $ - $ 6,398 91ine park 8416005 $ 16,411 $ 855 $ 7,745 $ 7,895 8484003 C Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 $ 12,431 $ 4,328 $ - $ 8,103 Redwood Meadows Park Des 8417014 $ 9,350 $ - $ - $ 9,35ii Trail head Prop Acquisition M21403 $ 2]5,0I 253,170 $ 21,830 Fisher House Espanola,Ctr .21401 $ 415,030 $ 365,156 $ 64,525 $ 25,348 IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 $ 56,109 $ - $ 1,302 $ 54,808 Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 $ 1,042,694 $ 135,6]9 $ 24,8]4 $ 82,141 Cnty#1 Match 3 Creek Confluen M20424 $ 259,159 $ 133,125 $ 5,716 $ 115,318 FY20 Bridge to Backman .2.30 $ 156,565 $ 16,346 $ 22,490 $ 117,J28 UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 $ 122,281 $ - $ 60 $ 122,222 9Lme Orchard 8420136 $ 156,827 $ 10,265 1 3,950 $ 142,612 Three Creaks West Bank N-Park 8422403 $ 150,736 $ - $ - $ 150,736 Historic Renovation AIIenParK 8422410 $ 420,000 $ 260,376 $ - $ 159,624 Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 $ 160,819 $ - $ - $ 1. 1, RAC Playground with ShadeSails .21415 $ 179,323 $ - $ 17 $ 179,266 Bridge to Backman 8418005 $ 266,306 $ 10,285 $ 4,051 $ 211,969 900 S River Park Soccer Field 8423406 $ 28J,848 $ - $ - $ 287,848 Lighting NE Baseball Field 8423409 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300'wo SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 $ 319,139 $ - $ - $ 319,139 Parley's Trail Design M17012 $ 327,678 $ - $ - $ 327,678 Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 $ 428,074 $ 19,J19 $ ],448 $ 400,916 Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 $ 446,825 $ 21,823 $ 10,771 $ 411,230 Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 $ 510,00' $ 34,234 $ 10,127 $ 465,638 Gateway Triangle Property Park 8423408 $ 499,563 $ - $ - $ 499,563 RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 $ '21,564 $ - $ - $ 521,564 Green loop 200 E Design 8422408 $ 608,490 $ - $ 2,452 $ 606,038 Mem.Tree Grove Design&Infra 8423407 $ '67,962 $ - $ - $ 867,962 SLCFoohillsTrailheadDeveipmnt M22412 $ 1,304,682 $ 88,382 $ - $ 1,216,300 GlendaleWtrprk MstrPin&Rehab 8422406 $ 3:177141 $ 267,681 $ 163,900 $ 2,746,268 Pioneer Park 8419150 $ 3,149:123 $ 6J,450 $ 22,109 $ 3,059,564 Glendale Regional Park Phase 1 8423450 $ 4,350,000 $ - $ - $ 4,350,000 Grand Total $ 21,852,274 2,263,009 1,591,335 17,997,931 Sum of Street Allocation Sum of Street Allocation Sum of Street Allocation Description Co.Con Budget Amended Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YTD Remaining Appropriation Trans Master Plan 8419006 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ - $ - 9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 $ 63,915 $ - $ 63,955 $ - :00S Signal ImprovementsIF 8422615 $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000 $ - 00/700SStm tReconstructio 8412001 $ 15,026 $ 11,703 $ 3,323 $ d 4 182 237 Transportation Safety Improvem 841]007 $ 1,292 $ - $ - $ 1,292 Gladiol.Street 8406001 $ 16,1. $ 13,865 $ - $ 2,244 Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 $ 6,500 $ - $ - $ 6,500 6484o0s D Transportatn Safety Imprvmt IF 8422620 $ 44,411 $ 3,939 $ 28,319 $ 12,142 Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 $ 29,817 $ 17,492 $ - $ 12,374 Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 $ 13,473 $ - $ - $ 13,473 Soo to 700 S 8418016 $ 22,744 $ - $ - $ 22,]44 Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 $ 25,398 $ - $ - $ 25,398 900 South 9Lme RR Cross IF 8422604 $ 213 M $ - $ - $ 28,000 170OS Corridor Tram frm[n IF 8422622 $ 35,300 $ 35,311 Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 $ 35,393 $ - $ - $ 35,392 200S TransitCmpl1StrtSuppl IF 8422602 $ 37,4202 $ - $ - $ 37,422 Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 $ 58,780 $ 20,697 $ - $ 38,083 300 N Complete Street Recons I 8423606 $ 40,000 $ $ 40,Ooo 1300 S Bicycle Bypass(pedestr 8416004 $ 42,833 $ - $ - $ 42,833 Local Link Construction IF 8422606 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ 90,000 Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 $ 1.4,500 $ - $ - $ 104,500 Transit Cap-Frei Trans Routes 8423608 $ 110,"' $ 110,000 Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 $ 124,593 $ - $ - $ 124,593 Virginia Street Reconstruction 8423624 $ 191,663 $ - $ - $ 141,663 300 North Reconstruction 8423622 $ 154,]39 $ - $ - $ 114,739 1700 East Reconstruction 8423628 $ 158,570 $ - $ - $ 158,570 9005outh Reconstruction 842362] $ 171,944 $ 171,944 Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 $ 181,846 $ - $ - $ 181,896 TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 $ 211,111 $ 10,340 $ 34,2J2 $ 2":174 200 S Recon Trans Corridor IF 8423602 $ 252,000 $ - $ - $ 252000 West Temple Reconstruction 8423626 $ 338,633 $ - $ - $ 338,633 Street Improve Recenstruc 20 8420125 $ 780,182 $ 147,983 $ 248,890 $ 383,309 1100 East/Highland Drive 8423623 $ 500,]28 $ - $ - $ 500,728 IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 $ 125,000 $ 625,- 2100 South Reconstruction 8423629 $ 660,410 $ - $ - $ 660,910 Traffic Signal Upgrades 8419008 $ 450 $ - $ - $ 450 Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 $ 836,736 $ 65,846 $ 92,075 $ 728,815 1300 East Reconstruction 8423625 $ 812,805 $ - $ 9JI $ 811,834 200 South Reconstruction 8423621 $ 915,151 $ - $ - $ 115,151 700 South Phase 7IF 8423305 $ 1,121,111 $ - $ - $ 1,120,000 Grand Total 9 010 976 304,815 491,804 8,214,356 Sum of Budget-Amended Sum of Enc..-brances Sum of YFD Expenditures Sum of Remaining Appropriation $18,801,543 rgtal 31,139,643 2,584,913 2,083,139 26,4 591 E=A+B+c+D TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY �kj "s�i TO: City Council Members Project Timeline: 1st Briefing: October 18, 2022 FROM: Ben Luedtke Public Hearing: February 21, 2023 • Budget&Policy Analyst end Briefing:March 7,2023 3rd Briefing:TBD if needed DATE: March 7,2023 Council Vote: March 21,2023 Note:future steps will include briefings,a RE: $3.5 Million One-time HOME-ARPA Funding public hearing,votes to amend plans and make final funding awards Ni INII ORMA FION The Administration transmitted a proposed final draft of the allocation plan for how the City will use the$3.5 million of one-time fundin .The funding between eligible use categories changed from the preliminary draft in October based on the Council's policy feedback and community, input,The Council prioritized rental assistance and creating deeply affordable rental housing with an emphasis on family sized housing and mixed-income developments.The proposal is to evenly split the..remaining$3,003,216 between tenant based rental assistance and development of deeply affordable rental housing.This is shown in the table below,There is also $529,979 for the cost of administering the program and planning efforts to create the draft plan(e.g.,community engagement, needs assessment,gap analysis).The Council previously approved in a budget amendment using some of the planning funds to Create the draft plan as allowed by I IUD. Once I IUD accepts the City's allocation plan and amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan,then the City will have access to all the remaining funds.The $3 million for funding awards would go through an open and Competitive application process, review and funding recommendations by an advisory board and the Mayor,and final funding decision making by the Council through an appropriations resolution.This mirrors the annual HUD grants process. Use of HONJI ARP Funding-Revisions Preliminary Final Draft Draft Plan Plan Supportive Services {Rental Assistance_ S753.215175 $0,00 Case Management. Victim Services, etc. Acquisition and Development of Non- Congregate Shelters $0.00 $0.00 Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) SO,00 S1.501,608.00 Development of Affordable Rental S2,250,000.00 $1.501,608.00 Housing Non-Profit Operating $0,00 WOO Non-Profit Capacity Building $0,00 $0.00 Administration and Planning S529.979.25 S529,979.00 Total HOVEE ARP Allocation $3 533 195.00 S3,533,195.00 h=ote: "Reutal Ass istai ice"cr7der the "St rRRorai•e Sern-ices"category is siiiiilar to TBR4 brit st ith latrdlord-tetratrt tuediation, eviction prevention selilces,and Frousiug;'tenant-relater)sen ices as eligible uses q fillirling, CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL COM q P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 iP $1.5 Million Each for Tenant Based Rental Assistance and New Deeply Affordable Rental Housing Evenly splitting the S3 million between 51.5 million for tenant based rental assistance and$1.5 million for development of deeply affordable rental housing is intended to address the rising populations of rent burdened residents at risk of becoming homeless and the rising population of persons experiencing homelessness. The funds to development new deeply affordable rental units would be prioritized for family sized units(three or more bedrooms)and mixed-income developments to avoid concentrating deeply affordable housing. Developments could be construction of new units, acquisition of property,or rehabilitation of existing units into deeply affordable housing. Single room occupancy(SRO)and permanent supportive housing are eligible types of housing for these funds per HUD.This would be like the $6 million the Council awarded last fall to create;new deeply affordable housing units before the emergency winter overflow shelter closes in April this year. Deeply affordable housing typically is defined as 40%area median income(AMU or below.The $1.5 million from HOME-ARPA would have a longer development time for new units to be created. Funds must bee spent by September 30, 2030. The funds for tenant based rental assistance would be passthrough grant awards to community nonprofits providing rental assistance to residents. In addition to rent,the funds may also cover security deposits,utilities, and other housing related costs. HUD requires the funds be used to benefit low-to-moderate income residents at 8o%ANN or below. During earlier discussions,some Council Members emphasized the importance of continuing to provide rental assistance as Federal funding for pandemic emergency rental assistance ends. Concerns were also mentioned that a potential recession could further worsen financial pressures on low-to- moderate income renters. March 1 Deadline and A ending the 2021- 2022 Annual Action Plan HUD is requiring cities to amend the 2021 - 2022 Annual Action Plan because the funds were originally announced in April 2021. Ho ever, final guidance from I IUD was issued in March 2022 with additional technical assistance in June 2022. HUD set a deadline of March 31, 2023,for cities to submit amendments to the 2021 - 2022 Annual Action Plan stating how the funds will be used which is called an allocation plan. Three-part IIUD Requirement for Allowable Uses of$3.5 Million HOME-ARPA As a reminder, any use of the$3.5 million must meet a three-part HUD requirement: (1)benefit a qualifying population at low-to-moderate-income considered 8o%AM or below, (2)align with one of the eligible uses, and(3)have a demonstrated need as shown through feedback from the community,the gaps analysis and/or needs assessment. Sete the Additional Info section for details on qualifying populations and eligible uses. Attachment i-Enhanced Public Noticing for Three Separate HUD Funds The Administration provided this two-page memo to help clarify=concurrent public noticing for three separate HUD funds over this year.The funds include the City's —$6 million of annual HUD grant awards, one-time S14.3 million unallocated HUD program income(the Council held two briefings about this last month),and the one-time$3.5 million of HOME-ARPA funding. Attachment 2_-Comparing Tenant Based Rental Assistance with Supportive Services Rental Assistance. The attachment is a table comparing requirements and eligible;uses for rental assistance between the two separate categories of tenant based rental assistance and supportive services rental assistance.At the October briefing,some Council Members expressed a preference for tenant based rental assistance,to avoid rental assistance competing with the many other potential activities allowed under the supportive;services category. Note that supportive services is a broad category with a variety of potential activities such as childcare, mental health or substance abuse treatment,transportation,job training,food assistance,case management and legal assistance for credit,mediation,or crime;-victim services among others. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE As the Council recalls,the City has received various allocations of federal American Rescue Plan Act or ARPA money.One of the allocations is$3.5 million from the U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD)for housing programs or assistance related to the pandemic.The Administration provided an informational progress update on efforts to meet HUD requirements to access the$3.5 million of one-time funding. Salt Lake City's award of$3,533,195 from HUD was authorized as part of ARPA for the HOME Investment Partnership grant,but the funds are subject to different regulations.The funds are to provide housing,services,non-profit support,and shelter to qualified populations(See Additional Info section for Page 1 2 allowable uses).It's important to note that the award is more than three times the City's $1,171,026 annual HOME grant award for FY2023 and is a significant opportunity to meet community needs. In Budget Amendment#6 of FY2022,the Council approved$176,66o or 5%of the City's total award for the Housing Stability Division's administrative and planning expenses.The Division used the funds to develop a community assessment and allocation plan,which provided a needs assessment,gaps analysis and public outreach.The Administration recommends $2.25 million be used to create new permanent supportive housing or transitional housing with deeply affordable rents at 40%Area Median Income(AMI).This would be very similar to the $6 million to create deeply affordable housing units that the Council approved in Budget Amendment#3 on September 20.The remaining$753,216 is recommended to be used for supportive services. HUD regulations allow other uses of the$3.5 million. See the Additional Info section for allowable uses. The unspent remaining 95%of funds may not be used until the Council receives the completed draft plan, holds a public hearing,votes to amend the City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and the Annual Action Plan, and then HUD approves the changes.The deadline for the City to spend all the HOME-ARPA funds is September 30, 2030. Next steps would mirror the regular annual HUD grant awards process by offering an open application period for all interested parties,followed by Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board(HTFAB)review in public meetings, competitive scoring and funding recommendations from the advisory board and a second set of funding recommendations from the Mayor.The City Council makes the final funding decisions after considering the two sets of funding recommendations,public feedback,and deliberation. Goal of the briefing:Review the Administration's recommendations,discuss policy considerations,and identify the City's preferences amongst HUD's allowable uses for the one-time funds. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. City Preferences Amongst HUD's Allowable Uses—The Council may wish to discuss whether the proposed funding split of$2.25 million for deeply affordable housing creation and$753,216 for supportive services advances the City's policy goals or additional allowable uses and funding splits should be considered.See Additional Info section for allowable uses. 2. Maximum Award—The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration whether a maximum award should be used to spread the one-time funding further so more organizations could benefit. 3. Loan vs Grant Options for New Housing Creation—The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration whether all the funds should be offered as grants or could some be structured as loans so the funding revolves for additional rounds of public investment. 4. Family-sized Housing Policy Priority—The Council acting as the RDA Board identified family-sized housing as a top priority for funding to create new housing units.The Council may wish to discuss whether the$3.5 million of one-time funding should also prioritize family-sized housing. 5. Deeply Affordable Deed Restrictions—The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether housing developments receiving grant funds would be required to deed restrict unit affordability for tenants at or below 40%AMI,and how long such restrictions would last.The Council has previously expressed a preference for deed restrictions of 50 years or longer to align with the useful life of the building and protect taxpayer's investment to create the public benefits.HUD often requires a 15-year compliance period. 6. Potential to Add Deeply Affordable Housing to RDA and/or Housing Authority Developments—The Council may wish to ask the Administration to explore opportunities for the HOME-ARPA funding to add deeply affordable units to housing developments receiving funding from the RDA(e.g.,Fall 2022 NOFA)and/or from the City Housing Authority. 7. Coordination with Funding Our Future(FOF)Housing Programs—The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration how HUD grant awards are being coordinated with FOF housing programs.In recent years,some community organizations are receiving FOF and HUD grant dollars for the same or similar programs.This approach could help the City and community organizations leverage multiple Page 13 funding sources but could also create duplication. See Additional info section for a list of FOF housing programs and expenses. ADDITIONAL AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION Allowable Uses of HOME-ARPA Funds A proposed use must meet three conditions to be allowable: 1. Identified as a local need in the community assessment 2. Target a qualifying population which are: a. Individuals or households that are or are at-risk of experiencing homelessness,or b. People who are fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence,dating violence,stalking,sexual assault,or human trafficking,or c. Populations for whom supportive services would prevent the family's homelessness or having a high risk of housing instability,or d. Households with a veteran family member that meets one of the above criteria. 3. Be an eligible housing or supportive service activity which are: a. Supportive services such as childcare,mental health or substance abuse treatment, transportation,job training,food assistance,case management and legal assistance for credit, mediation,or crime victim services among others b. Acquisition,rehabilitation,or new construction of non-congregate temporary shelter c. Tenant based rental assistance including security deposit and utilities d. Acquisition,rehabilitation or new construction of affordable rental housing such as multifamily apartments,permanent supportive housing,single room occupancy and prefabricated/manufactured housing e. Non-profit general operating expenses such as personnel costs,utilities,insurance,supplies, etc. (limited to 5%of the City's total award; may not exceed the greater of 50%of the non- profit's general operating expenses or$50,000) f. Non-profit capacity building(limited to 5%of the City's total award;may not exceed the greater of 50%of the non-profit's general operating expenses or$50,000) g. Administration and planning(limited to 15%of the City's total award; see below for more) Options to Structure as a Loan vs.a Grant HUD regulations limit HOME-ARPA funds to grants for tenant based rental assistance and supportive housing services.Multiple loan options are allowed for creation of new housing including traditional fixed interest rate loans,deferred payment structured loans,forgivable loans,surplus cash basis loans or as a grant. 15%or$529,979 Maximum for Administration and Planning Expenses HUD set a maximum limit of how much HOME-ARPA grant fund can be used for expenses related to administering the one-time funds.This is like the annual HUD grants which also have maximums for administrative expenses.The City's expenses related to administering the program impact the Attorney's Office,Finance Department,and the Community and Neighborhoods Department particularly the Housing Stability Division.In Budget Amendment#6 of FY2022,the Council approved$176,66o or 5%of the total for early planning and community outreach.The remaining$353,319 or to%of the total would be available for grant administration expenses after HUD approves the City's allocation plan.This would leave$3,003,216 or 85%of the total for awards to eligible applications. Funding Our Future(FOF)Housing Budgets List for FY202� $671,620 Incentivized Rent Assistance $525,380 Service Models for the Most Vulnerable $388,000 Build a More Equitable City $300,000 Marketing Home Ownership Programs $250,000 New House 20 Program $120,786 Planner FTE $115,000 Landlord Insurance Expanded Housing Opportunity Program $103,220 Community Development Grant Administrator FTE $100,000 Shared Housing $50,000 Mortgage Assistance Page ( 4 ATTACHMENTS 1. Enhanced Public Noticing for Three Separate HUD Funds 2. Comparing Tenant Based Rental Assistance(TBRA)with Supportive Services Rental Assistance ACRONYMS AMI—Area Median Income ARPA—American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 FOF—Funding Our Future FTE—Full Time Employee FY—Fiscal Year HTFAB—Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board HUD—United States Housing and Urban Development Department RDA—Redevelopment Agency TBRA—Tenant Based Rental Assistance Page ,� 0w r � MEMORANDUM cA DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS n _ HOUSING STABILTY DIVISION �rrr�«s� To: Council Members and Council Staff From: CAN and Housing Stability Date: February 11,2023 Subject: Enhanced Messaging to the Public about Upcoming SLC HUD Funding The City will be entering into separate periods of public comment related to three different federal Housing and Urban Development(HUD)funding awards and HUD program income.These funds are required to adhere to public noticing processes outlined in federal regulations and the City's HUD 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and Citizen Participation Plan. In addition to the required noticing,the Administration is seeking to enhance and fiwther assist the public with clear and equitable messaging about these HUD funds and the opportunities to review,provide feedback,and/or apply for these funds. The different HUD funding awards and program income are: Unallocated HUD CDBG and HOME Program Income,one-time HOME-ARP,and the annual HUD Entitlements FY 2023-2024(CDBG, HOME, ESG,and HOPWA).These funds have various HUD timelines and deadlines,outlined below,and all are required to adhere to Salt Lake City's HUD 2020-2024 5-year Consolidated Plan,2020-2024 Citizen Participation Plan,the respective Annual Action Plans, and two of the funding streams will require Substantial Amendments related to the Consolidated Plan and associated Annual Action Plans. Required HUD Public Noticing(per the 2020-2024 Citizen Participation Plan): All Public Comment Periods and Public Hearing Notices are posted in English and Spanish on the State's Public Notice website,printed in a newspaper of general circulation,sent to community partners to post, and provided to the Mayor's Office and the Council Office for dissemination on social media platforms and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. Proposed Enhanced HUD Public Messaging: The Housing Stability Division will work with the City's Civic Engagement team,and the communication liaisons for the Council Office and the Mayor's Office,to create and distribute simplified messaging and social media friendly graphics to assist the public about the three separate HUD funds and their public comment periods.For example,"Attention residents,there's a lot going-on in SLC with federal HUD funds.Your voice matters on how these funds are invested in the city.Click here to find out more." Spanish language versions of the enhanced messaging will be created and distributed as well,and fliers will be posted in community centers and libraries throughout the city. HUD Awards and Program Income—Public Process and Approval Schedule: 1. HUD HOME-ARP: (One-time$3.5 million HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds authorized by The American Rescue Plan(ARP),requires a Substantial Amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan to include the HOME ARP Allocation Plan) 0 February 7-March 21: 30+day required HUD public comment period • February 21: Public hearing • February 21,March 7,and/or March 14(depending on Council schedule and need): Council work session briefing(s) • March 21: Council formal meeting-consideration of Resolution • March 31: HOME-ARP Allocation Plan is due to HUD 2. Annual HUD Entitlement Funds,FY 2023-2024 (~$6 million HUD Entitlement Grant Programs: Community Development Block Grants or CDBG,Emergency Solutions Grants or ESG,HOME Investment Partnerships Programs or HOME,and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS or HOPWA,requires the creation and submittal of a 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan) • March 7-April 21: 30+day required HUD public comment period • March 21,April 4,11, 18(depending on Council schedule and need): Council work session briefing(s) • April 18: Council formal meeting-consideration of Resolution • May 15: 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan due to HUD 3. Unallocated HUD CDBG and HOME Program Income: (-$14 M, included in the City FY23-24 Budget, requires a Substantial Amendment to the 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan and 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan) • February 14—Council first briefing • TBD—Additional Council briefings,Council recommendations,and period of public comment Attachment 2- Comparing Tenant Based Rental Assistance(TBRA)with Supportive Services Rental Assistance Rental Assistance&Housing Related Costs Under TBRA Under Supportive Services Requirements for Use Waitlist required Yes No Written Tenant Selection Policies Required Yes Yes Rent Standard Requirement Yes Yes HQS Inspection Requirement Yes No Lease Agreement Required Yes Yes-only for ongoing assistance, not for arrears Min. Lease Term requirement Yes-Min. 12 months No-Between tenant&landlord, written agreement Eligible Uses Applicaton Fees No Yes Deposit in addition to First&Last month No Yes First&Last Month Security Deposit Yes Yes Rent Yes Yes Rent Arrears No Yes Utility Deposits Yes-only if rec.rental assistance Yes Utility Assistance Yes Yes Moving Costs(including temporary storage fees No Yes after loss of or while obtaining housing) Term of Assistance Yes,Up to 24 months,within a 3- consecutive. Yes,Until expiration of lease.Must be year period.Can be non- consecutive. Landlord-Tenant Mediation/Liaison No Yes Eviction Prevention Services No Yes Housing/Tenant related Legal Services No Yes ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor t J' and NEIGHBORHOODS t z =x BLAKE THOMAS Gfa= 'C$j Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 02/09/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrator Officer Date sent to Council: 02/09/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 9, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community &Neighborhoods SUBJECT: Substantial Amendment to the Salt Lake City 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan to include the Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan for utilization of The American Rescue Plan Act (ARP), U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD), one-time, supplemental HOME Investment Partnerships Program(HOME), referred to as HOME-ARP, funds in the amount of$3,533,195 for non-congregate shelter, supportive services, or affordable housing for qualified populations. STAFF CONTACT: Tony Milner, Director of the Housing Stability Division 801-535-6168, tonyaiiilncr{ci slc-,ov.com Heather Royall, Deputy Director of the Housing Stability Division 801-535-7273, 1icather.roy�illrcr;slc,,ov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Set the date for a public hearing and approve the included resolution adopting a substantial amendment to the 2021-22 HUD Annual Action Plan to approve and include the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, according to the schedule provided herein. BUDGET IMPACT: $3,533,195 in one-time, supplemental HOME-ARP funds. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Through the American Rescue Plan Act(ARP), Salt Lake City was notified on April 28, 2021, about a one-time, supplemental allocation of U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD), HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME-ARP) funds in the amount of$3,533,195 for the purpose of non-congregate shelter, affordable housing, Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA), and related supportive services to benefit homeless individuals, individuals at risk of homelessness, individuals fleeing or attempting to flee SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145460,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5460 TEL 901.535.6230 domestic violence, and households at great risk of housing instability. This allocation is separate from and does not affect the City's annual HUD HOME funding. The Administration has determined that substantial amendments to the Salt Lake City 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020-2024 Citizen Participation Plan are not required for the receipt of HOME-ARP funding. However, a substantial amendment to the 2021-22 HUD Annual Action Plan, which was the current Action Plan when the HOME-ARP funding was announced, is required to receive the funding. The purpose of the Substantial Amendment to the 2021-2022 Action Plan is to incorporate a HOME-ARP Allocation Plan (Plan). HUD regulations require submission of the Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and related Substantial Amendment to the Salt Lake City 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan by March 31, 2023. As such, the Administration requests that the City Council: 1. Schedule the following required public hearing: a. February 21, 2023, Public Hearing to review the substantial amendment to the 2021-22 Annual Action Plan to include the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and accept the final draft, pending any final revisions Council may have, of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and hear comments from the public on the Amendment and Plan. 2. Schedule the following work sessions: a. March 7, 2023, first full briefing discussion. b. March 14, 2023, if needed, second briefing discussion. 3. Schedule the formal adoption of the Amendment and Plan: a. March 21, 2023, formal meeting: to potentially adopt the substantial amendment to the 2021-22 Annual Action Plan and final draft, pending any final revisions Council may have, of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan as outlined in the attached resolution. Pursuant to HUD guidelines, the City must engage in consultation and public participation processes and develop the Plan to receive the funds. On February 1, 2022, the Administration presented to the Council an update on the HOME-ARP funds and informed the Council that HUD would be providing additional guidance in the summer of 2022. On October 18, 2022, the Administration presented a preliminary draft plan("Partial Draft Plan") that included a summary of the consultation and public participation processes for the Council's review and feedback. Currently, the Administration has provided a Final Draft of the Plan,refer to Exhibit 1: Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, Final Draft(Final Draft Plan), that includes a comprehensive community assessment; needs assessment, gaps analysis, summary of community outreach, and uses of funding. The Final Draft Plan incorporates feedback and policy direction as provided by the Council, and also incorporates input that has been provided by residents and community partners. Since the Partial Draft Plan was reviewed by Council, changes have been made to the proposed funding allocations as follows: Use of HOME-ARP Funding-Revisions Preliminary Final Draft Draft Plan Plan Supportive Services (Rental Assistance, $753,215.75 $0.00 Case Management, Victim Services, etc. Acquisition and Development of Non- Congregate Shelters $0.00 $0.00 Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) $0.00 $1,501,60&00 Development of Affordable Rental $2,250,000.00 $1,501,608.00 Housing Non-Profit Operating $0.00 $0.00 Non-Profit Capacity Building $0.00 $0.00 Administration and Planning $529,979.25 $529,979.00 Total HOME ARP Allocation $3,533,195.00 $3,533,195.00 Note: "Rental Assistance"under the "Supportive Services"category is similar to TBRA but with landlord-tenant mediation, eviction prevention services, and housing/tenant-related services as eligible uses offunding. The next step in the process is a public comment period that is currently underway and a public hearing that is proposed to be set for February 21, 2023. Subsequently, on March 21, 2023, the Administration requests that the Council consider the adoption of a resolution, Exhibit 3: Resolution, to approve a substantial amendment to the 2021-22 HUD Annual Action Plan to include the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan,pending any final revision the Council may have. Administration's Proposed Use of Funds —Homeless Housing Grant Fund Phase II: As illustrated in the Final Draft Plan, the number of persons experiencing homelessness has increased over recent years,primarily due to instability caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and rising costs in the housing market. Accordingly, there is a need to fund new units of rental housing for persons experiencing homelessness as well as to stabilize households that are at risk of homelessness. First, to add new units of housing, the Administration proposes using funding for the construction or acquisition/rehabilitation of new deeply affordable housing and proposes to prioritize the use of these funds for developments that incorporate mixed-income and family units. Projects shall serve qualified populations, as outlined in the HOME-ARP notice, and will include low-income households that meet HUD's definition of chronically homeless or are otherwise assessed by the region's coordinated entry system as the most vulnerable homeless persons. Due to the limited cash flow generated by these types of housing projects, the Administration recognizes that funding may need to be provided as a deep subsidy or grant. Funding would leverage various other sources of local, state, and federal funds, including the $6 million approved Homeless Housing Grant Fund in FY 2022-23. The $6 million approved in BA3 has been deployed to immediately increase housing units, with available units starting as soon as April of 2023, while the HOME-ARP funds would be available for projects that are further out in the development process. Second, to address the need for rental assistance that will prevent additional individuals and families from falling into homelessness, the Administration proposes using funding for Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA), as allowed under HOME-ARP for qualifying populations. Rental assistance will be essential in helping to transition individuals and families who may still be stabilizing economically from the COVID-19 pandemic, especially as other funding sources for rental assistance end. This funding can be used with one or multiple subrecipient nonprofits in the community. TBRA can be used to fund payments to cover insufficient amounts that the qualifying household cannot pay for housing and housing related costs, such as rental assistance, security deposits, and utilities deposits for qualifying populations. Process Overview: A summary of the process to finalize the Plan, adopt the necessary HUD amendment, and obtain HUD approval for the City's utilization of HOME-ARP is as follows, with this transmittal initiating Steps 3, 4, and 5 of the process: ACTIVITY DETAILS CITY COUNCIL ACTION STEP 1:Initial Initial outreach and assessment,as follows: • N/A Community • Consultation with stakeholders and initial public engagement Outreach and . Needs assessment and gaps analysis Assessment . Initial 15-day public input period: May 22-June 8,2022 (completed) . Housing Stability public hearing: June 1,2022 STEP 2:Partial A Partial Draft Plan,based on the efforts completed in Step 1,is . Transmittal Draft Plan transmitted to Council for a policy discussion. . Policy discussion (completed) • Plan components transmitted: o Summary of available funding o Summary of public engagement o Summary of needs and gaps • Plan components pending additional outreach and policy discussions: o Planned activities(general and not project specific) o Affordable housing production goals(number of units) o Preferences for target populations o Method of awarding funding(RFP,application process, etc. STEP 3: Complete A Complete Draft Plan,including all of the plan components . Transmittal Draft Plan outlined in Step 2 and incorporating policy direction,is finalized • Consideration of and transmitted to Council.A 30-day minimum public comment adoption after public period is initiated. comment period and public hearing STEP 4:Public During the public comment period in Step 3,the City Council . Public Hearing Hearing shall hold a public hearing. STEP 5: Adoption The Council adopts the Substantial Amendment 2021-2022 . Resolution Annual Action Plan. STEP 6: HUD Housing Stability staff will file the appropriate certifications and . N/A Approval submission to HUD. (upcoming) Eligible Activities: For an activity to be eligible for HOME-ARP, it must align with the following Eligible Uses and Qualifying Populations and have a demonstrated need through the needs assessment, gaps analysis, and community input. Eligible Uses: • Development or rehabilitation and support of affordable housing for qualifying populations. HOME-ARP defines "housing" as including but not limited to manufactured housing, single room occupancy (SRO) units, and permanent supportive housing. Emergency shelters, hotels, motels, facilities such as nursing homes, residential treatment facilities, correctional facilities, halfway houses, and housing for students or dormitories do not constitute housing in the HOME-ARP program. HOME-ARP funds may be used to acquire and rehabilitate such structures into HOME-ARP rental housing. HOME definition, permanent with a lease. • Acquisition and development of non-congregant shelter units, which may be converted to permanent housing or permanent affordable housing, used as emergency shelter, or left as non-congregant emergency shelter. • Tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA). • Supportive service, for organizations carrying out HOME-ARP activities, to qualifying individuals, including housing counseling and homeless prevention services. Qualifying Populations: • Individuals or households that are or are at-risk of experiencing homelessness, or • People who are fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, stalking, sexual assault, or human trafficking, or • Populations for whom supportive services would prevent the family's homelessness or having a high risk of housing instability, or • Households with a veteran family member that meets one of the above criteria. COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT &ALLOCATION PLAN: To target the HOME-ARP funds to the unique needs of recipient communities, HUD required all recipients to undertake an in- depth community assessment, including engaging in consultation and a public participation process, conducting a needs inventory and gap analysis, prior to the development and submission of the Plan for approval. The Plan developed by the City must be influenced by the findings of the community assessment, in order to be approved by HUD. The Administration conducted this in-depth community assessment to evaluate the gaps and unmet needs in Salt Lake City,related to the HOME-ARP qualifying populations, eligible activities, and services, in accordance with the HUD HOME-ARP regulations. HUD has authorized access to, and use of 5% of a recipient's total award for up-front Administrative and Planning purposes. Once Salt Lake City's HOME-ARP Plan is approved by HUD, the remaining award will be made available to the City. All funds must be used by September 30, 2030. To facilitate the City's HOME-ARP community engagement and assessment process and development of an Allocation Plan, Housing Stability contracted the services of Zions Public Financing Inc. (ZPFI), who surveyed community partners, collected housing and homelessness related data, and helped prepare the Community Assessment reports and initial Draft Plan. Housing Stability was able to contract ZPFI with funds budgeted for FY 21-22, in anticipation of HUD requiring such assessments. COMMITMENT OF FUNDS: The Administration, through Housing Stability, will administer the HOME-ARP funds, and staff will continue to communicate with the City Council about the HOME-ARP allocation process. Funds will be committed through a competitive application. A competitive application process could follow the traditional HOME funding allocation process, including reviews and recommendations of applications by a Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Board(CDCIP), then the Mayor, and then the Council for final approval. The City has and will continue to collaborate with Salt Lake County, the State of Utah, and the RDA to enhance the impact of HOME-ARP funds within the community. The priorities of the City Council, Mayor's Office, and City's Homeless Engagement and Resource Team (HEART) will also continue to be considered throughout this process. HOME-ARP can be committed through the following options to develop or rehabilitate affordable housing: grant, amortized loan, forgivable loan, surplus cash loan, or deferred payment loan. HOME-ARP funds used as TBRA can be provided as a loan or a grant. PROPOSED SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT: Due to the City's allocated HOME-ARP funding a substantial amendment is required for the adopted 2021-22 Annual Action Plan, to include a HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. (Note: HUD guidance outlines that a substantial amendment to the City's 2020-24 HUD Consolidated Plan is not required for the HOME-ARP funds.) HUD REQUIREMENTS HUD's Substantial Amendment Section 24 CFR 91.505 (b), outlines the criteria for Substantial Amendment and states "the jurisdiction shall identify in its Citizen Participation Plan the criteria it will use for determining what constitutes a Substantial Amendment. It is these Substantial Amendments that are subject to a citizen participation process, in accordance with the jurisdiction's citizen participation plan." SALT LAKE CITY 2020-2024 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS Salt Lake City's Consolidated Plan for 2020-2024 Citizen Participation Plan defines a Substantial Amendment as: 1. A proposed use of funds that does not address a goal or underlying strategy identified in the governing Consolidated Plan or Annual Action Plan; or 2. Increasing funding levels for a given project by 100% or more of the previously adopted amount; or 3. Decreasing funding levels for a given project by 100% AND pivoting impacted funds to another approved use during an action plan period; or 4. A change to a regulatory requirement or additional allocated funding from the US Department of Housing &Urban Development that defines that a Substantial Amendment must be completed. Substantial Amendment to 2021-22 Annual Action Plan: Accept Additional Allocations of Funding and Include the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan The City's 2021-22 Annual Action Plan's funding allocations were approved through Resolution No. 14 of 2021, an appropriations resolution adopting the One-Year Annual Action Plan for 2021-2022, which includes HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Based on HUD Notice CPD-21-10, issued September 13, 2021,Requirements for the Use of Funds in the HOME-American Rescue Plan Programs, Section V. HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, a Substantial Amendment is required to accept the HOME-ARP. These funds represent an additional allocation of funding from HUD to Salt Lake City's approved 2021-22 Annual Action Plan. The City's 2021-22 Annual Action Plan will be amended to include the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, which identifies the additional funding and outlines the proposed uses of the grant funds. (Note: The HOME-ARP funds were allocated to the City April 28, 2021, and HUD requires that the HUD program year at time of final guidance be amended.) PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: The first Public Comment Period was a hybrid meeting held May 22, 2022, through June 8, 2022, with an Administration Public Hearing hosted by Housing Stability on June 1, 2022. There were no comments received during the public comment period or related public hearing. This Public Comment Period was an opportunity for the public to review and give feedback on a draft of the HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan. (Note: HUD requires the Administration to conduct annual HUD General Needs Hearings to receive feedback from the public on the City's current Consolidated Plan needs and goals. These hearings are publicly noticed, are open and public meetings, and members of the Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board are invited to assist with the hearings. Received public feedback is then summarized in the City's HUD Annual Action Plans. Guidance from HUD on the HOME-ARP funds required the Administration to hold two Public Hearings related to the HOME-ARP funds; one during the development of the draft HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan to receive feedback and another on the final draft Plan, to receive feedback and assist with the final decision.) A second Public Comment Period will be held February 5, 2023, through March 21, 2023, with a Public Hearing on February 21, 2023 to finalize the Plan and related Substantial Amendments. After this period, received public comments will be reviewed and included in the final submission of the Community Assessment and Allocation Plan to HUD. All Public Comment Period and Public Hearing Notices are posted in English and Spanish on the State's Public Notice website, printed in a newspaper of general circulation, sent to community partners to post, and provided to the Mayor's Office and the Council Office for dissemination on social media platforms and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. Please see Exhibit 2 for a Summary of Public Comments. COORDINATION WITH COMMUNITY PARTNERS: Salt Lake City has worked closely with Salt Lake County, the State of Utah and other community partners to ensure funds will be strategically targeted to reach HOME-ARP qualifying populations. Community Partners include: • HUD Regional Office, • State and County HOME-ARP grantees, • The Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness and the Salt Lake County Continuum of Care, • National homeless and affordable housing consultants and advocacy groups. NEXT STEPS: Once adopted by the Council, the Administration will submit the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan to HUD as a substantial amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan for HUD's review and acceptance to fully award HOME-ARP funding to Salt Lake City. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1. Salt Lake City's HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan, Final Draft Plan Exhibit 2. Summary of Public Comments Exhibit 3. Resolution EXHIBIT 1: Salt Lake City's HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan,Final Draft Plan SALT LAKE CITY HOME-ARP ALLOCATION PLAN MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL CITY COUNCIL VICTORIA PETRO,VICE CHAIR ALEJANDRO PUY CHRIS WHARTON ANA VALDEMOROS DARIN MANO, CHAIR DAN DUGAN AMY FOWLER Prepared by S A L T L A K E C I T Y HOUSING STABILITY DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBHORHOODS I Table l of Contents Tableof Contents.........................................................................................................................................2 Consultation .................................................................................................................................................4 PublicParticipation...................................................................................................................................14 Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis......................................................................................................16 HOME-ARP Activities..............................................................................................................................25 HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals.................................................................................................27 Preferences.................................................................................................................................................29 ReferralMethods.......................................................................................................................................31 Limitations in a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project..............................................................32 2 Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Template with Guidance Instructions: All guidance in this template, including questions and tables, reflect requirements for the HOME-ARP allocation plan, as described in Notice CPD-21-10: Requirements of the Use of Funds in the HOME-American Rescue Plan Program, unless noted as optional. As the requirements highlighted in this template are not exhaustive,please refer to the Notice for a full description of the allocation plan requirements as well as instructions for submitting the plan, the SF-424, SF-424B, SF-424D, and the certifications. References to "the ARP" mean the HOME-ARP statute at section 3205 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-2). 3 Consultation In accordance with Section V.A of the Notice (page 13), before developing its HOME-ARP allocation plan, at a minimum, a PJmust consult with: • CoC(s) serving the jurisdiction's geographic area, • homeless service providers, • domestic violence service providers, • veterans'groups, • public housing agencies (PHAs), • public agencies that address the needs of the qualifying populations, and • public or private organizations that address fair housing, civil rights, and the needs of persons with disabilities. State PJs are not required to consult with every PHA or CoC within the state's boundaries; however, local PJs must consult with all PHAs (including statewide or regional PHAs) and CoCs serving the jurisdiction. Participating Jurisdiction: Salt Lake City Date: 3/16/2022 Describe the consultation process including methods used and dates of consultation: This HOME-ARP allocation plan was prepared in consultation with agencies and service providers whose clientele include the HOME-ARP qualifying populations (QPs). QPs include: • Individuals or households that are currently homeless or are at-risk of experiencing homelessness, or • People who are fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, or • Populations for whom supportive services would prevent the family's homelessness or having a high risk of housing instability, or • Households with a veteran family member that meets one of the above criteria. A wide variety of agencies serve the needs of QPs, including, but not limited to, entities that focus on homeless services, veterans' groups, individuals with disabilities, persons facing violence and abuse, and those offering mental health services. On the front lines daily, these entities have provided invaluable insights and data for inclusion in this allocation plan and provide the foundation of our allocation plan analysis. In order to receive as much input as possible from the QPs, a survey was provided to 79 entities (listed below) to identify unmet needs and gaps in facilities and services, as well as to solicit feedback from these agencies on identifying HOME-ARP eligible activities currently taking place in their jurisdiction. A cover letter explaining the purpose of the survey and the importance of each entity's feedback, signed by representatives from Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County, was also sent with the 4 survey. The survey was conducted from January 24, 2022, through February 25, 2022, with follow-up phone calls and e-mails sent to non-responsive entities after that time period. In some cases, follow-up interviews took place in order to gather more data and a deeper understanding of current needs —especially unmet needs. The survey response rate was approximately 42%. All CoCs, PHAs, Domestic Violence Service Providers, and Veteran Services responded to the survey. A brief summary of responding organizations and the comments received are shown in the table below. In addition to the survey responses, extensive research and data was gathered regarding homelessness, populations at risk of homelessness, veterans, and persons attempting to flee situations of violence (domestic, dating, sexual assault, human trafficking, etc.). Major data sources used include: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), local point-in- time counts (PIT), CoC data, South Valley Services (Sanctuary), YWCA, Utah Community Action and United States Census data. List the organizations consulted: AgencylOrg Type of AgencylOrg Method of consulted Consultation Feedback Advantage Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless Services, Inc. Veterans' Group, Individual or Family. Organization Serving Persons with disabilities Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing is lack of affordable housing. Alliance House Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Organization Serving Homelessness. Persons with Disabilities Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in housing are truly affordable housing. TheSoap2Hope Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Fleeing, or Human Trafficking Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). 5 Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in housing/shelter are safety, openings, crisis undisclosed shelter for victims, trauma informed services. Shelters are understaffed and overwhelmed. We need HOME-ARP funding in areas where the population can access resources without barriers. Department of Government Entity, Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Workforce Services Services for Low Income Homelessness. Families/Individuals, Families/Individuals at Preferred use of funds is for Risk of Homelessness Acquisition Development of Non- Congregate Shelter Units. Organization Comments: Need available affordable housing. Assist Inc. Fair Housing Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Organization, Homelessness. Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in services is permanent supportive services and case management for persons ex eriencin homelessness. Family Support Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless Center Domestic Violence —Individual and Family. Survivors, Human Trafficking Survivors, Preferred use of funds is for Families/Individuals at Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Risk of Homelessness Building Assistance. Organization Comments: 6 Greatest gap in housing/shelter is for family sober living. Greatest gap in services is mental health care roviders. Journey of Hope, Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Inc. Domestic Violence Homelessness. Services, Human Trafficking Services, Preferred use of funds is for the Organization Serving Creation of Affordable Rental Persons with Housing. Disabilities. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is not enough DV/SA trafficking beds on the Wasatch Front. Family Promise Homeless Services Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless Salt Lake —Individual or Family. Preferred use of funding is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Housing Authority Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of of Salt Lake City Domestic Violence Homelessness. Services, Veterans' Group, Fair Housing Preferred use of funds is for Organization, Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Organization Serving Building Assistance. Persons with Disabilities, Organization Comments: Families/Individuals at The greatest gap to Risk of Homelessness housing/shelter is affordable accessible housing with limited qualifying restrictions. State of Utah, Government Entity, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless- Office of Homeless Homeless Services Individual or Family. Services Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition/Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. 7 YWCA Utah Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Fleeing, or Domestic Violence Attempting to Flee (Domestic Services, Human Violence, Dating Violence, Trafficking Services Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Utah Community Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Fleeing, or Action Families/Individuals at Attempting to Flee (Domestic Risk of Homelessness Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. The Road Home Homeless Services Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless- Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is the extreme lack of deeply affordable housing stock. This deficit leads to reduced shelter outflow and means we are able to serve fewer people with emergency shelter and housing. Fourth Street Clinic Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Healthcare Provider Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Acquisition/Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. 8 Asian Association Refugee & Immigrant Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of of Utah Service Provider Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. First Step House Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Veterans' Group, Individual or Family. Substance Use Disorder and Mental Health Preferred use of funds is for the Treatment, Organization Creation of Affordable Rental Serving Persons with Housing. Disabilities Organization Comments: Many of the homeless and chronically homeless concurrently struggle with co- occurring and chronic mental health conditions that will not ever resolve. Our systems must realign to support these individuals over long periods of time, in some cases indefinitely. Veterans Affairs Veteran Services Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - SLC Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in needed housing/shelter are in the aging population - over age 55. We are seeing an alarming rate of seniors being displaced from their homes. They do not have the ability to increase their income based on their age. We need more affordable senior housing. 9 Disability Law Civil Rights Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Center Organization, Fair Homelessness. Housing Organization, Organization Serving Preferred use of funds is for Persons with Disabilities Supportive Services. Rape Recovery Domestic Violence Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Center Services, Human Individual or Family. Trafficking Services Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: Non-profit organizations need capacity building dollars. Crossroads Urban Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Center Families/Individuals at Homelessness. Risk of Homelessness Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Focus on deeply targeted affordable housing and Permanent Supportive Housin . Helping Hand Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Association - DBA Organization Serving Individual or Family. The Haven Persons with Disabilities Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. The INN Between Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Healthcare Provider Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is access to appropriate services to obtain the very limited housing available. Lack of seasonal shelters. 10 Utah Domestic Domestic Violence Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Violence Coalition Services, Human Homelessness. Trafficking Services Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition/Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in needed services is flexible funding to help remove barriers for survivors of violence to gain access to housing or maintain their current housing. NeighborWorks of Low-Income Home Survey Highest unmet need is Fleeing, or Salt Lake Buyer Assistance Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in needed services is for mental health, substance abuse, affordable healthcare access in general. Salt Lake Valley Low-Income Home Survey Highest unmet need is Families Habitat for Buyer Assistance, seeking stable housing. Humanity Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. Clean Slate Utah Low Income Legal Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. 11 211/United Way of Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - SLC Domestic Violence Individual or Family. Services, Human Trafficking Services, Preferred use of funds is for Civil Rights Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Organization, (TBRA). Organization Serving Persons with Organization Comments: Disabilities, The greatest gap in Families/Individuals at housing/shelter is tenant choice Risk of Homelessness housing vouchers that reflect current cost of local average rent and not based on prior year domestic rent values. Also, the aging population is rapidly facing homelessness due to fixed income/retirement no longer keeping pace with senior housing voucher values. Salt Lake City Homeless Services, Food Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Mission Pantry Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. 12 Department of Government Entity Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Health and Human Homelessness. Services Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: The greatest gaps in needed housing/shelter are too many restrictive conditions and definitions. Hard to End information on certain programs and website information being incorrect with no response to inquiry's online about programs by staff. We do not have enough special housing programs with services for people with disabilities. Shelter the Homeless Services Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Homeless Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is deeply affordable housing, non- congregate shelter. Greatest gap in services is in case management and medical support. West Valley City Housing Authority, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Housing Authority Domestic and Other Individual or Family. Violence Services, Fair Housing Organization, Preferred use of funds is for Organization Serving Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Persons with (TBRA). Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Organization Comments: Risk of Homelessness Greatest gap in housing/shelter is the lack of affordable, safe, and decent rental units. 13 Public Housing Housing Authority, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Authority DBA Domestic and Other Unaccompanied Youth under 25 Housing Connect Violence Services, Years of Age. Veterans' Group, Fair Housing Organization, Preferred use of funds is for the Organization Serving Creation of Affordable Rental Persons with Housing. Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Organization Comments: Risk of Homelessness Greatest gap in housing/shelter is deeply affordable housing. Greatest gap in services is supportive services that focus on housing retention. Salt Lake City and Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Salt Lake County Government Entity, Homeless - Individual or Family. CoC - Salt Lake Families/Individuals at Valley Coalition to Risk of Homelessness Preferred use of funds is for the End Homelessness Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap is housing - 2,950 housing units now and 1,400 additional units annually. Shelter- 450+overflow shelter beds. Greatest gap in services is in case management and behavioral health. Summarize feedback received and results of upfront consultation with these entities: The feedback received is backed up by the data researched and forms the basis for our allocation of HOME-ARP funds. Specifically, our allocation plan prioritizes the gaps described by survey respondents and identified in the data. The major unmet eligible needs described by respondents include creation of deeply affordable rental housing and supportive services for the qualifying populations of individuals or families experiencing homelessness, at risk of homelessness, and domestic violence victims. Public Participation In accordance with Section V.B of the Notice (page 13), PJs must provide for and encourage citizen participation in the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan. Before submission of the plan, PJs must provide residents with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed HOME-ARP allocation plan of no less than 15 calendar days. The PJmust follow 14 its adopted requirements for "reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment"for plan amendments in its current citizen participation plan. In addition, PJs must hold at least one public hearing during the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan and prior to submission. PJs are required to make the following information available to the public: • The amount of HOME-ARP the PJwill receive, and • The range of activities the PJmay undertake. Throughout the HOME-ARP allocation plan public participation process, the PJ must follow its applicable fair housing and civil rights requirements and procedures for effective communication, accessibility, and reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities and providing meaningful access to participation by limited English proficient(TEP) residents that are in its current citizen participation plan as required by 24 CFR 91.105 and 91.115. Describe the public participation process, including information about and the dates of the public comment period and public hearing(s) held during the development of the plan: • Date(s) of public notice: 512212022 • Public comment period: start date- 512212022 end date- 61812022 • Date(s) of public hearing: 61112022 • Date(s) of public notice: 21712023 • Public comment period: start date - 21712023 end date- 312112023 • Date(s) of public hearing: 212112023 Describe the public participation process: Salt Lake City will conduct two public comment periods and public hearings, one during the creation of the plan from May 22, 2022, to June 8, 2022, and another to be completed after Council revietiv. The public hearing on June 1, 2022, had no attendees. There were no public comments during the first comment period. The draft allocation plan was available on the Salt Lake City Housing Stability website for any person to view and comment on. The public notice can be found here and is an attachment to this plan. r11fore h#61-mation ivdl be included after the secone1p cblic hearing, Describe efforts to broaden public participation: The notice of the public comment period and public hearing is posted in the local newspaper, online at Salt Lake City Housing Stability's webpage, and through City Council postings. The posting was available in English and Spanish as well as ADA compliant. Summarize the comments and recommendations received through the public participation process either in writing, or orally at a public hearing: There were no public comments received during the public comment period from May 22, 2022, to June 8, 2022, and no attendees of the public hearing on June 1, 2022. 1111fore inf rInation tivill be included after the sccondpublic comment period, 15 Summarize any comments or recommendations not accepted and state the reasons why: There were no comments nor recommendations not accepted by Salt Lake City. Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis In accordance with Section V.C.1 of the Notice (page 14), a PJ must evaluate the size and demographic composition of all four of the qualifying populations within its boundaries and assess the unmet needs of each of those populations. If the PJ does not evaluate the needs of one of the qualifying populations, then the PJ has not completed their Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis. In addition, a PJ must identify any gaps within its current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system. A PJshould use current data, including point in time count, housing inventory count, or other data available through CoCs, and consultations with service providers to quantify the individuals and families in the qualifying populations and their need for additional housing, shelter, or services. Homeless Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table Homeless Current Inventory Homeless Population Gap Analysis Family Adults Only Vets Family Adult Vets Victims F ily Adults Only #of #of #of #of #of HH(at HH of DV #of #of #of #of Beds Units Beds Units* Beds least 1 (w/o Beds Units Beds Units child child Emergency 483 47 862 Not 0 Shelter Avail. Transitional 226 60 136 Not 80 Housing Avail. Permanent Supportive 1,155 333 1,394 Not Avail. 622 Housing Other Permanent 0 0 0 0 Housing Sheltered 634 1,055 73 329 Homeless Unsheltered 0 268 7 26 Homeless Current Gap 1,230 Not 1,069 Not Avail. Avail. Data Source: CoC Housing Inventory Count(HIC)and Point in Time Count(PIT) (2020) Although there is an aggregate surplus of family and adult shelter beds, according to the above table, there is a difference with each population. For example, there are 1,323 adults experiencing homelessness in Salt Lake City and 862 beds available for immediate need. Transitional and permanent housing may take time to achieve, and a person will have to utilize a shelter bed while waiting on an application to transition or permanent housing. The gap for shelter beds available to families are 151. The gap for adult only shelter beds are 461. It is likely that all permanent supportive housing currently in Salt Lake City is rented at capacity. 16 Housing Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table Non-Homeless Current Inventory Level of Need Gap Analysis #of Units #of Households #of Households Total Rental Units 42,179 Rental units Affordable to HH at 30%AMI(At-Risk of 4,745 Homelessness Rental units Affordable to HH at 50%AMI(At-Risk of 14,850 Homelessness) 0%-30%AMI Renter HH w/ 1 or more severe housing 6,555 problems (At-Risk of Homelessness 30%-50%AMI Renter HH w/l or more severe housing 2,380 problems (other populations) Current Gaps 8,935 Data Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) (2014-2018) The above table shows a surplus of housing units available and affordable to households at 50% AMI. When looking at households at or below 30% AMI there is a significant gap of 1,810 units. This shows the need for deeply affordable rental units for residents at or below 30%AMI. It is likely that the number of households will continue to grow as Salt Lake City population grows over the next five to ten years. Providing more deeply affordable housing will keep up with the continued population growth that Salt Lake City is seeing. Describe the size and demographic composition of qualifying populations within the P.Ps boundaries: Within the boundaries of Salt Lake City, we have the following data regarding the HOME-ARP qualifying populations: 1,958 people met the HUD definition of Homeless,residing in local shelters, transitional housing, or unsheltered during the HUD 2020 Point in Time Count. As shown in the table above, there are 7 unsheltered homeless veterans and 73 sheltered homeless veterans. There are 26 unsheltered victims of domestic violence and 329 sheltered victims of domestic violence. Other data received, including 2021 Fall Point in Time Counts indicate an increase in homelessness during the Covid-19 pandemic. The data shows that during Covid-19 unsheltered counts increased significantly. In 2021, the unsheltered PIT count represented approximately 17% of the homeless population. Further, approximately 18% of the homeless population avoided access to shelters due to Covid-19. In addition, the number of unsheltered individuals from 2019-2020 increased by 39%while the overall homeless population only increased by 6.3%. 17 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fall Unsheltered 136 193 268 306 Sheltered 1668 1651 1690 1502 Total 1804 1844 1958 1808 Source: Salt Lake Cigy Salt Lake County PIT Of concern is the fact that unsheltered unaccompanied youth increased by 121%between 2019 and 2020, although show some decrease in 2021. Population 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fall Persons in Households with Adult(s) and Children) - - - 4 Persons in Households with Only Children 1 - - Persons in Households with Only Adults 135 193 268 302 Chronically Homeless Individuals 44 86 120 91 Veterans 7 12 7 15 Unaccompanied Youth 9 19 42 8 Persons with HIV 5 1 6 5 Source: Salt Lake City/Salt Lake County PIT According to the 2020 Point in Time Count, the largest demographic of those experiencing homelessness are those people who identify as White at 71%; the second largest demographic are people who identify as Black at 13%. In addition,people identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native represent 5%; Pacific Islanders represent 3%; Asians represent 1%; and multiple races represent 7%. Homeless as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 The total number of emergency shelter beds in Salt Lake City are 1,349 (HIC, 2020). As shown in the table above, the number of homeless individuals is 1,958 (PIT, 2020). This indicates a shortage in emergency shelter beds versus homeless individuals. In addition, 4,166 people became homeless for the first time in 2020. At Risk of Homelessness as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 According to 2014-2018 CHAS data, approximately 76% of the City's cost-burdened households are renters and 60% are severely cost-burdened. According to CHAS data, Salt Lake City has 12,550 households that have an annual income under 30% AMI. This increases the risk of homelessness for those that are trying to maintain their current housing as house prices and rental rates continue to surge at an alarming pace. Median rent in Salt Lake City has increased by nearly 75% from 2000-2019 (2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates). Close to 84% of survey respondents indicated development of rental housing is extremely important to qualifying populations. In addition, 97% stated permanent housing should be expanded to meet the needs of qualifying populations. 18 Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking, as defined by HUD in the Notice There are two primary domestic violence service providers, South Valley Services (SVS) and YWCA Utah. These organizations serve individuals fleeing, attempting to flee, domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking or human trafficking, as defined by the HUD Notice CPD-21-10. Together, within a one-year period, the two agencies have provided housing, safety and other services to 1,597 individuals that include men, women, and children in the State of Utah. SVS has received 2,217 hotline calls, 923 Lethality Assessment Program(LAP) calls, case-managed 1,007 individuals, and provided therapy to 426 individuals. YCWA served 2,112 individuals by domestic violence programs in the last year. The YWCA had 309 requests for services that could not be met and 48% of those were for housing. There are more data gaps in our Domestic Violence and Human Trafficking data due to more strict confidentiality rules surrounding this qualifying population. Other populations requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness and other populations at greatest risk of housing instability, as defined by HUD in the Notice Other populations include individuals or households experiencing evictions, those earning under 50 percent of AMI, and those living in neighborhoods with low mobility rates. CHAS data indicates there are 22,610 households in Salt Lake City that are below 50% AMI. In the consultation survey, respondents identified lower-income renters and the elderly as especially vulnerable to housing instability due to rising rents and home prices. In conjunction with job losses and unemployment due to the pandemic, as well as a reliance by the elderly on fixed incomes, there is an increasing gap between incomes and housing costs. Service providers indicated an increased need in services, including hotline calls,requests for shelter, eviction prevention, mental health services, medical care, case management and housing supports. Nearly 89% of survey respondents stated homelessness prevention services should be expanded in the regional area to support qualifying populations. Identify and consider the current resources available to assist qualifying populations, including congregate and non-congregate shelter units, supportive services, TBRA, and affordable and permanent supportive rental housing (Optional): According to the 2020 HIC report, the current resources to meet the needs of qualifying populations are as follows: 4,915 total year-round beds which include, 1,712 of emergency, safe haven and transitional housing beds, and 3,203 of permanent housing beds which include permanent supportive housing, rapid re-housing, and other permanent housing. The HIC report specifically identifies 2,199 family beds, 2,711 adult only beds and 5 child only beds. Subsets of the total year-round inventory include 757 beds for veterans, 110 beds for youth and 1,501 beds to serve the chronically homeless. In addition, there are 58 seasonal beds, and 160 overflow/vouchers. Data is not available to distinguish between congregate and non- congregate shelter units. Salt Lake City used motel vouchers to create non-congregate shelter units, currently there are no non-congregant shelters in Salt Lake City. 19 Salt Lake City has made efforts to offer a wide range of services including TBRA, medical/dental services, mental health counseling, domestic violence shelters and counseling, legal aid and resources to identify available affordable housing. In November 2020 the Kern C. Gardner Policy Institute provided a report outlining the current challenges in serving qualifying populations given the existing governance structure and made several recommendations for improvements, including the appointment of a statewide homeless services officer, a homeless council, and a philanthropic consortium. In addition, as reflected in the consultation process, the need for affordable housing is a high priority to service providers and government entities. Describe the unmet housing and service needs of qualifying populations: As discussed in the sections above, the number of unsheltered homeless individuals has increased by 39% from 2019-2020. According to survey respondents, nearly 54% indicated a gap in affordable housing inventory in the regional area. This is also shown in the 2014-2018 CHAS data. As stated, multiple times throughout the consultation process, the need for services has increased and access to these services has become cumbersome for qualifying populations. In addition to limiting barriers to access these services, service providers are in need of qualified staff to assist with providing services and support. As shown in the graph below, survey respondents stated there is a gap in case management services for qualifying populations. While the need for more affordable housing and more case management services was listed as a need for all groups, as shown in the survey responses below, specific needs for the various qualifying populations are listed following the two graphs. Whore are the Greatest Gaps in Needed Housing/Shelter for Qualifying Populations? Specific populations including aging MENEM= Supportive services IM More dispersed location of shelters and...10 Rental assistance Permanent supportive housing 10 Emergency shelter(beds) MENNOM Online/hotline housing assistance OEM Non-congregate shelters EM Affordable housing(deeply affordable) 0 5 10 15 20 20 Where are the Greatest Gaps in Needed Services for Qualifying Populations? Aging populations I= More staffing MENNEN= Domestic abuse/violence OEM= Supportive services for homelessness I= Housing support/assistance I= Disabilities I= Mental health/substance abuse services NEENEENEENEENEENEEM Medical NONE= Case management/continuum of services 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Homeless as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 Over 60 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed to this group of qualifying populations. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Availability of deeply affordable housing for individuals or families • Tenant Based Rental Assistance • Homeless Service Support • Additional Shelter Beds At Risk of Homelessness as defined in 24 CTW 91.5 Around 30 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed to populations at risk of homelessness. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Supportive services and case management services • Affordable Housing Options • Tenant Based Rental Assistance • Aging populations accessing affordable housing Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking, as defined by HUD in the Notice Over 48 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed this group of qualifying populations. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Crisis shelters for victims • Staffing and Services • Non-congregate shelter options 21 Other populations requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness and other populations at greatest risk of housing instability as defined by HUD in the Notice Approximately 61 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed at other populations requiring services or housing assistance for those at greatest risk of housing instability. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Affordable Housing • Provide Supportive Services Identify any gaps within the current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system: Based on the data provided by the CoC Housing Inventory Count(HIC) and Point in Time Count (2020), there is currently sufficient inventory to match the homeless population, as seen in the above Homeless table. However, this count is a summation of all homeless inventory available to all populations included in the homeless count and does not account for gaps within the total inventory such as needs for specific homeless services and beds. The count also does not include the potential needs for families and individuals at greater risk of homelessness, such as those staying in hotels, doubled up with family, or cars. Those populations may not be counted in some of these numbers and many families under 50%AMI are housing cost burdened, paying over 30% of their income towards rent. Being housing cost burdened increases your likelihood of eviction as one financial emergency can remove the ability to pay rent. The housing inventory gap analysis also shows a surplus in aggregated housing inventory available to households under 50%AMI. However, when only considering households with 0- 30%AMI and the inventory available to these households which are at risk of homelessness, there appears to be a gap of 1,810 units available. This indicates that there is a substantial need in additional affordable housing at the lower level of AMI to better meet the needs of those at risk of homelessness. Under Section IV.4.2.ii.G of the HOME ARP Notice, a PJ may provide additional characteristics associated with instability and increased risk of homelessness in their HOME- ARP allocation plan. These characteristics will further refine the definition of"other populations"that are "At Greatest Risk of Housing Instability,"as established in the HOME- ARP Notice. If including these characteristics, identify them here: According to CHAS, there are 1,010 households with at least two persons where either one or both are 62 years old or older and have a total household income of less than 50 percent of HAMFI. The Salt Lake School District had a mobility rate of 17.1% among its families in the 2019-2020 school year according to data provided by the Utah State Board of Education. This percentage may have been affected by COVID-19 as the previous 6 school years each had a mobility rate of at least 23.7%. 22 Identify priority meedsjor qualifying populations: As indicated by the survey results and shown in the v'»nh bo|on'` the qualifying 000u1yCioo with the highest unmet need is homeless individual orfamily at54.04%. Which Qualifying Population has the Highest Unmet Need? Other(please specify) NNN� Fleeing,or Attempting to Flee(Domestic Violence, Dating Violence,Sexual Assault, Stalking,or Human Trafficking) 4u Risk ofHomelessness nomo|oos Unaccompanied Youth underz6 N� Years ofAge m� Homeless Individual orFamily O% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Next, when asked to rank the preferred use of HOME-ARP funds for qualifying populations, the creation of affordable rental housing ranked the highest with 52.94%. Preferred Use of HOME-ARP Funds Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance Acquisition/Development ofNon-Congregate Shelter Units Supportive Services Tenant-Based Rental Assistance(TaRA) NNNNNN� Creation of Affordable Rental Housing O% lO% 20% 30% 40% sO% 60% In addition, when asked whether permanent housing should bc expanded Coqualifying populations, 97.22% strongly agreed/agreed with the statement. 23 Permanent Housing Should be Expanded to Qualifying Populations Neither agree nor disagree I Agree MENNEN= 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Lastly, when survey respondents commented on any other areas related to the eligible use of HOME-ARP that should be considered as a funding priority, 53.57% indicated housing; of those who indicated housing, the following specific types of housing were mentioned: • Deeply targeted affordable housing—20% • Senior housing— 13% • Long-term housing— 13% • Supportive housing— 6% • Non-congregate housing— 6% • Sustainable housing—6% To summarize, the data and survey results conclude the qualifying population with the greatest unmet need is homeless individual or family and the priority need suggests affordable housing should be expanded within the regional area. Explain how the PJ determined the level of need and gaps in the PJs shelter and housing inventory and service delivery systems based on the data presented in the plan: The methodology used in the creation of this HOME-ARP Allocation Plan were derived from various sources, including 2020 and 2021 (Fall) PIT, 2020 HIC, 2014-2018 CHAS,U.S. Census Bureau 2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates and through the consultation process with service providers and government entities. 24 HOME-ARP Activities Describe the method(s)that will be used for soliciting applications for funding and/or selecting developers, service providers, subrecipients and/or contractors: Salt Lake City will solicit applications through a competitive application process. This process will be similar to that of the annual HUD funding Salt Lake City receives. Agencies and developers will be able to apply for funding through an application open for a minimum of thirty days. Eligible projects will then go through the public process which includes going before a public City review board, the Mayor, and City Council for final recommendations and approval. During the process Salt Lake City will outreach and collaborate with non-profit agencies, Other Salt Lake City Divisions, the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake, and other local municipalities to maximize the impact of HOME-ARP funding. Describe whether the PJ will administer eligible activities directly: Salt Lake City will work with a subrecipient or developer to administer the selected activities. Salt Lake City will provide oversight,but will not administer eligible activities directly. If any portion of the PJ's HOME-ARP administrative funds are provided to a subrecipient or contractor prior to HUD's acceptance of the HOME ARP allocation plan because the subrecipient or contractor is responsible for the administration of the PJ's entire HOME-ARP grant, identify the subrecipient or contractor and describe its role and responsibilities in administering all of the PJ's HOME ARP program: This question is not applicable. Salt Lake City Housing Stability has not provided any administrative funds to a subrecipient or contractor. We will provide program oversight and administration of the HOME-ARP funding. While subrecipients will be selected to undertake approved activities, Salt Lake City will not be contracting out the administration of our HOME- ARP grant or program oversight. In accordance with Section V.C.2. of the Notice (page 4), PJs must indicate the amount of HOME-ARP funding that is planned for each eligible HOME-ARP activity type and demonstrate that any planned funding for nonprofit organization operating assistance, nonprofit capacity building, and administrative costs is within HOME-ARP limits. 25 Use of HOME-ARP Funding Funding Amount Percent of the Statutory Grant Limit Supportive Services (Rental Assistance, Case $ $0 Management, Victim Services, etc.) Acquisition and Development of Non- $0 Congregate Shelters Tenant Based Rental Assistance(TBRA) $ 1,501,608.00 Development of Affordable Rental Housing $ 1,501,608.00 Non-Profit Operating $0r% 5% Non-Profit Capacity Building $0 #% 5% Administration and Planning $529,979.00 15% 15% Total HOME ARP Allocation $3,533,195 Describe how the PJ will distribute HOME ARP funds in accordance with its priority needs identified in its needs assessment and gap analysis: The survey and data gathered for Salt Lake City identified deeply affordable housing and case management supportive services as a major need and gap. City Council previously approved $176,659.75 as administration funds for Housing Stability to use for the required consultation process and the creation of the allocation plan. Salt Lake City can use up to $529,979.00 for administration and planning costs which can go to Housing Stability staff that have been working on the allocation plan and will continue to administer the HOME-ARP funding until 2030. To address the need for deeply affordable housing, Salt Lake City will fund the development of affordable rental housing in the amount of$1,501,608.00. Salt Lake City will prioritize the use of these funds for developments that incorporate mixed-income and family housing. This funding can be used in conjunction with a current project, as long as federal requirements are adhered to, for acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of affordable rental housing. All HOME units must be set aside for qualifying populations as defined in the HOME-ARP Notice CPD-21-10 to include: individuals or families experiencing homelessness, individuals or families at risk of homelessness, individuals or families fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, victims of human trafficking, individuals or households at risk of housing instability or requiring services to prevent homelessness, and veterans or families with a veteran. All qualifying populations must be considered to comply with HOME-ARP requirements. In addition to development, and to further increase housing options, Salt Lake City will fund rental assistance under Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) in the amount of$1,501,608.00. TBRA can be used to fund payments to cover insufficient amounts that the qualifying household cannot pay for housing and housing related costs, such as rental assistance, security deposits, and utilities deposits for qualifying populations. 26 This funding can be used with one or multiple subrecipient nonprofits in the community. Many organizations are already providing these resources but are reaching capacity and the need is much higher than the availability. This would allow for nonprofits to divert other funding resources to hire or retain staff that are assisting Salt Lake City residents, who meet the definition of a qualifying population, while also providing needed rental assistance. Salt Lake City will serve qualifying populations by prioritizing development of affordable housing and TBRA over the other eligible activities based on the community assessment, local legislative priority, and other known resources available within the community. Describe how the characteristics of the shelter and housing inventory, service delivery system, and the needs identified in the gap analysis provided a rationale for the plan to fund eligible activities: According to the data gathered and the survey respondents there is a high need in additional affordable housing. There seems to be a gap of 8,935 rental units for individuals and families making at or below 50% AMI. That gap continues to grow in the current economy of increased inflation and increased rental rates that wages are not able to keep up with. Currently Salt Lake City has two of the five homeless resource centers in its incorporated boundary and one domestic violence shelter. To promote housing first and take the survey into consideration, creating deeply affordable housing would address both the housing inventory gap and the current amount of people utilizing the homeless resource centers. The nonprofits that provide rental assistance resources to the qualifying populations state that their staffing capacity is low, due to recruitment challenges and low retention. Funding TBRA would allow for nonprofits to divert other funding resources received to hire or retain staff that are assisting Salt Lake City residents, who meet the definition of a qualifying population, while also providing needed rental assistance. HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals Estimate the number of affordable rental housing units for qualifying populations that the PJ will produce or support with its HOME ARP allocation: If Salt Lake City provides $1,501,608.00 in funding for affordable housing developments, it would assist with one to two development projects depending on the need and size of the project. HUD waived the maximum per-unit subsidy for HOME-ARP development dollars. It would be anticipated that a project will be mixed with fair market,high affordability, and low affordability units to sustain the project for at least 15 years. This mix can also include units of varying size, from studio to four bedrooms to accommodate individuals and families. According to the HUD Housing Production Goal Calculation spreadsheet, Salt Lake City estimates producing or supporting 4-8 units for HOME-ARP qualifying populations. Salt Lake City estimates spending between $200,000 and $400,000 of HOME-APR dollars on each deeply affordable HOME unit. That number is based on a recent deeply affordable project as well as accounting for the increasing material and labor costs in the construction market. 27 Describe the specific affordable rental housing production goal that the PJ hopes to achieve and describe how the production goal will address the PJ's priority needs: Affordable rental housing production is part of Salt Lake City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan under the goal of housing. This goal is to expand housing options, specifically affordable housing citywide. The 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan identified 5,075 households assisted over the four-year timeframe, which is 1,268 annually (Consolidated Plan SP-45, 2020-2021 Action Plan AP-20). The number identified includes annual CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funding for projects like rehabilitation, development,home ownership, and rental assistance. Since this funding would be including development and TBRA it can support the goal of assisting 1,268 household. Based on the 2020-2021 CAPER, it is likely that HOME-ARP will assist in 11 of the rental housing production goal for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. 28 Preferences A preference provides a priority for the selection of applicants who fall into a specific QP or category (e.g., elderly or persons with disabilities) within a QP(i.e., subpopulation) to receive assistance. A preference permits an eligible applicant that qualifies for a P.I adopted preference to be selected for HOME-ARP assistance before another eligible applicant that does not qualify fora preference. A method of prioritization is the process by which a PJ determines how two or more eligible applicants qualifying for the same or different preferences are selected for HOME- ARP assistance. For example, in a project with a preference for chronically homeless, all eligible QP applicants are selected in chronological order for a HOME-ARP rental project except that eligible QP applicants that qualify for the preference of chronically homeless are selected for occupancy based on length of time they have been homeless before eligible QP applicants who do not qualify for the preference of chronically homeless. Please note that HUD has also described a method of prioritization in other HUD guidance. Section I.C.4 of Notice CPD-17-01 describes Prioritization in CoC CE as follows: "Prioritization. In the context of the coordinated entry process, HUD uses the term "Prioritization" to refer to the coordinated entry-specific process by which all persons in need of assistance who use coordinated entry are ranked in order of priority. The coordinated entry prioritization policies are established by the CoC with input from all community stakeholders and must ensure that ESG projects are able to serve clients in accordance with written standards that are established under 24 CFR 576.400(e). In addition, the coordinated entry process must, to the maximum extent feasible, ensure that people with more severe service needs and levels of vulnerability are prioritized for housing and homeless assistance before those with less severe service needs and lower levels of vulnerability. Regardless of how prioritization decisions are implemented, the prioritization process must follow the requirements in Section I1.B.3. and Section I.D. of this Notice." If a PJ is using a CE that has a method of prioritization described in CPD-17-01, then a PJ has preferences and a method of prioritizing those preferences. These must be described in the HOME-ARP allocation plan in order to comply with the requirements of Section IV.C.2 (page 10) of the HOME-ARP Notice. In accordance with Section V.C.4 of the Notice (page 15), the HOME-ARP allocation plan must identify whether the PJ intends to give a preference to one or more qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project. • Preferences cannot violate any applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). • The PJ must comply with all applicable nondiscrimination and equal opportunity laws and requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a) and any other applicable fair housing and 29 civil rights laws and requirements when establishing preferences or methods of prioritization. While PJs are not required to describe specific projects in its HOME-ARP allocation plan to which the preferences will apply, the PJ must describe the planned use of any preferences in its HOME-ARP allocation plan. This requirement also applies if the PJ intends to commit HOME- ARP funds to projects that will utilize preferences or limitations to comply with restrictive eligibility requirements of another project funding source. If a PJfails to describe preferences or limitations in its plan, it cannot commit HOME ARP funds to a project that will implement a preference or limitation until the PJ amends its HOME-ARP allocation plan. For HOME ARP rental housing projects, Section VI.B.20.a.iii of the HOME ARP Notice (page 36) states that owners may only limit eligibility or give a preference to a particular qualifying population or segment of the qualifying population if the limitation or preference is described in the PJ's HOME ARP allocation plan. Adding a preference or limitation not previously described in the plan requires a substantial amendment and a public comment period in accordance with Section V.C.6 of the Notice (page 16). Identify whether the PJ intends to give preference to one or more qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project: The survey respondents have clearly stated that more deeply affordable housing is needed in Salt Lake City for families and individuals experiencing homelessness. Homeless individuals and families defined in the HOME-ARP Notice, according to ESG and CoC. It is proposed that deeply affordable housing being created would prioritize families and individuals experiencing homelessness. TBRA would not have a prioritization based on qualifying populations and can be open to any agencies that provide an eligible service to any qualifying population. If a preference was identified, explain how the use of a preference or method of prioritization will address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or subpopulation of qualifying population, consistent with the PJ's needs assessment and gap analysis: According to the housing inventory numbers previously shown there is a gap in deeply affordable units, for individuals and families making less than 30% AMI. There are currently 4,745 units available to Salt Lake City residents at or under 30% AMI with 6,555 households in Salt Lake City falling under the 30%AMI threshold. That leaves a gap of 1,810 units needed for the current residents. That does not consider the increase in population that Utah and Salt Lake City will likely see over the next five years. Creating deeply affordable housing units and prioritizing families and individuals currently experiencing homelessness will address the gap in housing since most individuals and families experiencing homelessness fall under 30%AMI and are currently priced out of the rising rental market. 30 Referral Methods PJs are not required to describe referral methods in the plan. However, if a PJ intends to use a coordinated entry (CE)process for referrals to a HOME-ARP project or activity, the PJ must ensure compliance with Section IV.C.2 of the Notice (page]0). A PJ may use only the CE for direct referrals to HOME-ARP projects and activities (as opposed to CE and other referral agencies or a waitlist) if the CE expands to accept all HOME-ARP qualifying populations and implements the preferences and prioritization established by the PJ in its HOME-ARP allocation plan. A direct referral is where the CE provides the eligible applicant directly to the PJ, subrecipient, or owner to receive HOME-ARP TBRA, supportive services, admittance to a HOME-ARP rental unit, or occupancy of a NCS unit. In comparison, an indirect referral is where a CE(or other referral source) refers an eligible applicant for placement to a project or activity waitlist. Eligible applicants are then selected for a HOME- ARP projector activity from the waitlist. The PJ must require a project or activity to use CE along with other referral methods (as provided in Section IV.C.2.ii) or to use only a project/activity waiting list(as provided in Section IV.C.2.iii) if L the CE does not have a sufficient number of qualifying individuals and families to refer to the PJfor the project or activity; 2. the CE does not include all HOME-ARP qualifying populations; or, 3. the CE fails to provide access and implement uniform referral processes in situations where a project's geographic area(s) is broader than the geographic areas) covered by the CE If a PJ uses a CE that prioritizes one or more qualifying populations or segments of qualifying populations (e.g.,prioritizing assistance or units for chronically homeless individuals first, then prioritizing homeless youth second,followed by any other individuals qualifying as homeless, etc) then this constitutes the use of preferences and a method of prioritization. To implement a CE with these preferences and priorities, the PJ must include the preferences and method of prioritization that the CE will use in the preferences section of their HOME-ARP allocation plan. Use of a CE with embedded preferences or methods of prioritization that are not contained in the PJ's HOME-ARP allocation does not comply with Section IV.C.2 of the Notice (pagel0). Identify the referral methods that the PJ intends to use for its HOME ARP projects and activities. PJ's may use multiple referral methods in its DOME-ARP program. (Optional): Local subrecipients will be required to operate HOME-ARP funded programs with no exclusions in the following way. All TBRA activities will be utilized on a first come, first eligible basis. The Development projects must be required to use a first come, first served basis, unless the family or individual is currently experiencing homelessness. That family or individual currently experiencing homelessness can be prioritized for the HOME units in the project being created. All subrecipients and projects will be required to have a waitlist for the HOME-ARP program. Based on the qualifying population, required documentation will be needed to support the qualifying status. Documentation may include but is not limited to; Utah Homeless Management Information System (UHMIS), Paystubsl Tax Returns, Case Manager Verification, State Assistance Verification(SNAP, TANF, Unemployment), VA Verification. 31 If the PJ intends to use the coordinated entry(CE)process established by the CoC, describe whether all qualifying populations eligible for a projector activity will be included in the CE process, or the method by which all qualifying populations eligible for the project or activity will be covered. (Optional): Salt Lake City does not intend to use the coordinated entry process established by the CoC since it does not serve all the qualifying populations listed in the HOME-ARP Notice CPD-21-10. If the PJ intends to use the CE process established by the CoC, describe the method of prioritization to be used by the CE. (Optional): Not Applicable If the PJ intends to use both a CE process established by the CoC and another referral method for a project or activity, describe any method of prioritization between the two referral methods, if any. (Optional): Not Applicable Limitations in a DOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project Limiting eligibility for a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project is only permitted under certain circumstances. • PJs must follow all applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). This includes, but is not limited to, the Fair Housing Act, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, section 504 of Rehabilitation Act, HUD's Equal Access Rule, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, as applicable. • A PJmay not exclude otherwise eligible qualifying populations from its overall HOME- ARP program. • Within the qualifying populations,participation in a project or activity may be limited to persons with a specific disability only, if necessary, to provide effective housing, aid, benefit, or services that would be as effective as those provided to others in accordance with 24 CFR 8.4(b)(I)(iv). A PJmust describe why such a limitation for a project or activity is necessary in its HOME-ARP allocation plan (based on the needs and gap identified by the PJ in its plan) to meet some greater need and to provide a specific benefit that cannot be provided through the provision of a preference. • For HOME-ARP rental housing, section VI.B.20.a.iii of the Notice (page 36) states that owners may only limit eligibility to a particular qualifying population or segment of the qualifying population if the limitation is described in the PJs HOME-ARP allocation plan. • PJs may limit admission to HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS to households who need the specialized supportive services that are provided in such housing or NCS. However, no otherwise eligible individuals with disabilities or families including an individual with a disability who may benefit from the services provided may be excluded on the grounds that they do not have a particular disability. 32 Describe whether the PJ intends to limit eligibility for a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project to a particular qualifying population or specific subpopulation of a qualifying population identified in section IV A of the Notice: Salt Lake City does not intend to limit eligibility for HOME-ARP rental housing. If a PJ intends to implement a limitation, explain why the use of a limitation is necessary to address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or subpopulation of qualifying population, consistent with the PJ's needs assessment and gap analysis: Not Applicable If a limitation was identified, describe how the PJ will address the unmet needs or gaps in benefits and services of the other qualifying populations that are not included in the limitation through the use of HOME ARP funds (i.e., through another of the PJ's HOME ARP projects or activities): Not Applicable 33 EXHIBIT 2: Summary of Public Comment SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS The first Public Comment Period was a hybrid meeting held May 22,2022,through June 8,2022,with a Public Hearing hosted by Housing Stability on June 1,2022.There were no comments received during the Public Comment period or the Public Hearing.This Public Comment Period was an opportunity for the public to review and give feedback on an initial draft of the HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan. A second Public Comment Period will be held February 7,2023,through March 21,2023,with a second Public Hearing on February 21,2023.After this period,received public comments will be reviewed and included in the final submission to HUD of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and Substantial Amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. All Public Comment Notices are posted in English and Spanish on the State's Public Notice website,printed in a newspaper of general circulation,sent to community partners to post,and provided to the Mayor's Office and the Council Office for dissemination on social media platforms and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. RESOLUTION NO. OF 2023 A resolution adopting an amendment to the One-Year Action Plan for 2021-2022 to include the American Rescue Plan (ARP)Act of 2021 Housing and Urban Development HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding. WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Council approved Resolution No. 14 of 2021, an appropriations resolution adopting the funding for the One-Year Annual Action Plan for 2021- 2022, which includes HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation (City) is eligible under Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 24, Part 91, et. al., to receive ARP Act 2021 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME-ARP) funds in the amount of$3,533,195 from HUD for the program year 2021-2022; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the people of Salt Lake City that the City file an application with HUD for said funds in accordance with 24 CFR Part 91; and WHEREAS, in order to receive said funds, the City is required to substantially amend the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan to include a HOME-ARP Allocation Plan; and WHEREAS, the public notices and other pre-submission requirements as set forth in 24 CFR Part 91 have been accomplished by the City, including but not limited to the following: The first public comment period was held on the substantial amendment and draft allocation plan May 22 through June 8, 2022, and an Administration public hearing on June 1, 2022. A second public comment period was held on February 7 through March 21, 2023, and a City Council public hearing on February 21, 2023; and WHEREAS, the City Council does now meet on this day of , 2023 to adopt a "substantial amendment"to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan to include the HOME- ARP Allocation Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1. That the City hereby adopts and ratifies the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. 2. That the City hereby adopts as a substantial amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan, the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan for HOME-ARP funds, which is attached hereto as Exhibit`B". 3. That the Mayor, as the official representative of Salt Lake City, or her designee, is hereby authorized to submit for the HOME-ARP funds with such additional 1 information and certifications as may be required under 24 CFR Part 91 to HUD. 4. That the Mayor, as the official representative of the City, or her designee, is hereby authorized to sign and execute a grant agreement with HUD (the "HUD Grant Agreement") regarding the HOME-ARP funds, and any and all subsequent agreements between the City and other public entities resulting from and consistent with the HUD Grant Agreement, subject to final approval as to form by the City Attorney. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIR Approved as to form: — Kimberly K. Chytraus Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date: February 9, 2023 ATTEST: CITY RECORDER 2 EXHIBIT "A" One-Year Annual Action Plan for 2021-2022 See attached. 3 SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 1:&VICE CHAIR,JAMES ROGERS DISTRICT 2: DENNIS FARIS DISTRICT 3: CHRIS WHARTON DISTRICT 4:ANALIA VALDEMOROS DISTRICT 5: DARIN MANO DISTRICT 6: DAN DUGAN DISTRICT 7:& CHAIR, AMY FOWLER Prepared by S A L T L A K E C I T Y HOUSING and NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT DIVISION COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS DEPARTMENT SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN TABLE ��� ����yJ'�� yJ'��� «^�K— �~��| � 8K_ | � U �� 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................4 PR-05 LEAD & HESPON|8BLE AGENCIES...............................................................................................14 AP-10 CONSULTATION..............................................................................................................................15 AP-12 PARTICIPATION ..............................................................................................................................28 AP-15 EXPECTED RESOURCES...............................................................................................................20 AP-20 ANNUAL GOAL &STRATEGIES.....................................................................................................35 AP-35 PROJECTS (]umman)....................................................................................................................37 AP-38 PROJECTS (Table) ..........................................................................................................................40 AP-50 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION ..................................................................................................4Q AP-55 AFFORDABLE HOUSING................................................................................................................53 AP-60 PUBLIC HOUSING...........................................................................................................................54 AP-85 HOMELESS & OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS ACTIVITIES..................................................................56 AP-70HOPVVA GOALS...............................................................................................................................61 AP-75 ACTION PLAN BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING.............................................................81 AP-85 OTHER ACTIONS ............................................................................................................................65 AP-U0 PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................70 2�ro , c SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2021 -2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The Annual Action Plan outlines the activities and funding priorities for the second year of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, covering July 1, 2021 -June 30, 2022. 3I P a e SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 24[FR91.200(c), 91.200(b) 1' Umtrpdmction Salt Lake City's2021-2022 Annual Action Plan is the product ofa collaborative, strategic process that spans community partners, service providers, non-profit/for-profit housing developers, housing authorities, internal divisions/departments,and the input of our residents.The Housing and Neighborhood Development(HAND) division of Salt Lake City has worked extensively to identify community development needs and establish goals that align funding streams, community priorities and city initiatives.This plan highlights many ofthe efforts to maximize and leverage the[ity's block grant allocations with other resources to build healthy and sustainable communities. The 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan identifies how the City intends to leverage the Community Development Block Grant(CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG), HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME),and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS(HOPWA)funding.These four resources will provide for over$5.4 million in support for low-to moderate-income households or areas of the city. Asin other cities across the country,Salt Lake City has been grappling with the immediate and long-term impacts of the Coronavirus panclemic on all aspects of life,from education, employment, housing,and basic needs.The Coronavirus pandernic exacerbated existing hardships in Salt Lake City such as growing income inequality, increasing poverty levels, and decreasing affordable housing.This Annual Action Plan works to address concerns within each of these needs and others by continuing to develop and refine new and collaborative strategies.The following highlights a few of the initiatives and efforts that the City is excited about in the coming year: ° Salt Lake City underwent a robust community engagement process in the development of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan (Con Plan).These planning efforts provided the City with a clear vision of the needs in the community and a framework for strategic and targeted deployment of funding.The Con Plan will serve as a roadmap as the City implements block grant funding over the next five years.Although the City's Con Plan process concluded just before the Coronavirus pandemic,the needs identified in the Con Plan remain as existing needs in Salt Lake City. Supplemental HUD funding through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Securities(CARES) Act and the American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA) have and will provide funding to both further advance the goals of the Con Plan and address Coro navi rus-related needs in Salt Lake City. 4�rogc SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Each activity identified in the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan meets one of the five goals as outlined in the Con Plan,summarized below.Additionally,the activities will serve as the catalyst to implement the strategies tied to each of the five goals. o Housing- Provide expanded housing options for all economic and demographic segments of Salt Lake City's population will diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. o Transportation - Promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal transportation options. o Build Community Resiliency- Build resiliency by providing tools to increase economic and/or housing stability. o Homeless Services- Expand access to supportive programs that help ensure that homelessness is rare, brief, and non-recurring. o Behavioral Health - Provide support for low-income and vulnerable populations experiencing behavioral health concerns, such as substance abuse disorders and mental health challenges. • Since taking office in January 2020 Mayor Erin Mendenhall has focused on breaking down equity barriers within Salt Lake City and providing opportunities of upward mobility for residents regardless of race, income, age, or ability. In an effort towards understanding the needs of underrepresented residents,the City's Community and Neighborhoods Department initiated The Future of Housing:A Collective Vision for an Equitable Salt Lake City.This vision encapsulates a recognition of the inequities that are prevalent in Salt Lake City and provides policy recommendations to break down the barriers that divide the City.As a starting point for this vision the City has embarked on a Gentrification Assessment and Displacement Mitigation Study to help identify and address systemic inequalities in housing. • Salt Lake City's response to COVID-19 has been a citywide approach to address the various urgent needs of the community due to the pandemic.Through a COVID-19 declaration of emergency the Mayor directed all City departments to identify resources to support individuals, households,and small businesses most affected by COVID-19. From the beginning of the pandemic, Salt Lake City has coordinated with the State of Utah,Salt Lake County, and our community-based organizations to collectively understand available resources and opportunities to collaborate with 5l11 a , e SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN our COVID-19 responses.As the pandemic intensified HAND gathered non-profit service providers, community representatives, and researchers to help understand the City's current and future needs, and to help guide emergency relief funds. In the summer of 2020,the Mayor aligned the City's general fund Funding Our Future housing program applications to target COVID-19 needs,additionally the City Council approved additional emergency general funds towards housing stability rent and mortgage assistance programs. During the pandemic, City staff have also continually promoted through the City's social media and other electronic distribution sources, information related to COVID related assistance and resources, such as the Federal Eviction Moratorium. • The supplemental federal funding that the City received in the form of the CARES Act,greatly assisted new activities to help the City prevent, prepare for,and respond to COVID-19.To utilize the CARES Act CDBG-COVID, ESG-COVID, and HOPWA-COVID funds, Salt Lake City completed a Substantial Amendment on the 2020-2024 Con Plan and conducted an accelerated competitive application process.Awarded activity categories included: Community Stabilization, Public Service Agencies, Housing Stability, Small Business Support, Homeless Prevention, Street Outreach, Rapid Rehousing, and Emergency Shelter.Additionally,the City received Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance Program funds and joined a collaboration with regional funders for a statewide application process to assist renters and prevent duplications of services. In 2021,Salt Lake City will receive funding from the American Rescue Plan Act including HOME funds prioritized for housing and shelter options for homeless individuals, and a second round of Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance. Salt Lake City greatly looks forward to utilizing these relief and assistance funds to further address the City's economic recovery needs. • Salt Lake City has been a constant leader in the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness (Coalition)which is a coordinated coalition of stakeholders working collaboratively to end homelessness in Salt Lake County. In the fall of 2019,the Coalition transitioned to a Homeless Resource Center(HRC) model.The HRC's provide residents housing stability and case management services to assist clients in overcoming barriers to self-sufficiency.The HRC's provide a multitude of services including diversion, housing navigation,job training, employment services, life skills, and connection to community resources.The HRC's will continue to be an important and critical service in our community and will lift our most vulnerable residents out of homelessness. 6IPage SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Resembling national trends, Salt Lake City is experiencing an increase in homeless encampments throughout the city,which has been compounded by COVID-19 occupancy limitations at the congregant-setting HRCs.The City has diligently worked with community partners to ensure that safety and basic needs of the campers are met, as well as connecting campers to resources and assistance by implementing Encampment Resource Fairs at the encampment before scheduled clean ups.To help inform the public,and those seeking services, in 2021 the City launched a new online Homeless Service Dashboard to track homeless services and data.This past winter the City also helped with the opening of two winter, non-congregant Emergency Shelters. Recently,the State of Utah reorganized its homeless funding under a new Homeless Services Office directed by a new Homeless Services Coordinator. Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall created a new position in the Mayor's Office,a Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach,to help coordinate homeless services throughout the City and the region, and the Mayor launched a Tiny Home Village campaign to house homeless individuals by the winter of 2021. • Salt Lake City supports the Housing First model,that housing is a right not a privilege.This view shapes housing policy and program implementation. Salt Lake City is working closely with community partners to provide opportunities for permanent supportive housing.This model provides the City's vulnerable residents with critical services to find stability, self-sufficiency, and upward mobility. • Small community businesses serve as the life blood of Salt Lake City.They not only provide opportunities for employment but also build the fabric of diversity within the City. Salt Lake City will continue to support our small, locally owned businesses by providing economic development loan funding through City resources.The COVID-19 crisis has impacted small, local businesses at a devastating level.The City is committed to ensuring that small, local businesses can open safely, and recover from this economic crisis. While this isjust a sampling of many of the exciting efforts the City is undertaking to address the needs in our community, it is fair to say that while federal funding plays an important role in our ability to leverage and maximize long-term impact, it is-and will continue to be a struggle as funding continues to be constantly challenged.As a city we look to other communities'best practices and innovative approaches to find the most effective methods of deploying these limited resources. 7IPage SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN In an effort to engage and leverage best practices across the nation, HAND participates in training opportunities, attends in-person or remote national conferences, contributes to regional planning conversations, and looks for opportunities to advocate not only for affordable housing, but also for addressing the gaps of funding or services that exist in our community. 2'Summmnorize the Goals and Strategies identified imthe Plan This Year-2 Annual Action Plan establishes and addressed several goals and strategies as outlined in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan.These goals are briefly outlined below. Greater detail is provided in section AP-20. 1) Housing: Provide expanded housing options for all economic and demographic segments of Salt Lake City's population while diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. Strategies: ° Support housing programs that address the needs of aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods ° Expand housing support for aging residents that ensure access to continued stable housing ° Support affordable housing development that increases the number and types of units available for income eligible residents ° Support programs that provide access Lo home ownership via down payment assistance, and/or housing subsidy, and/or financing ° Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and end homelessness ° Support programs that provide connection to permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs. Support may include, but is not limited to supporting obtaining housing via deposit and rent assistance and barrier elimination to the extent allowable tw regulation ° Provide housing and essential services for persons with H|V/A|US 2) Transportation: Promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal transportation options. Strategies: ° Improve bus stop amenities as a way to encourage the accessibility of public transit and enhance the experience uf public transit in target areas ° Support access to transportation prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations ° Expand and support the installation of bike racks, stations, and amenities as a way to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation in target areas o�r o g c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 3) Build Community Resiliency: Build resiliency by providing tools toincrease economic and/or housing stability. Strategies: ° Provide job training/vocational training programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations including, but not limited to; chronically homeless; those exiting treatment centers/programs and/or institutions; and persons with disabilities ° Economic Development efforts via supporting the improvement and visibility of small businesses through fa�ade improvement programs ° Provide economic development support for microenterprisebusinesses ° Direct financial assistance to for-profit businesses ° Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement, social development, and change the cycle ofpoverty ° Promote digital inclusion through access todigital communication technologies and theinturne1 ° Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable populations 4) Homeless Services: Expand access tm supportive programs that help ensure that homelessness is rare, brief, and nmn-recurring. Strategies: ° Expand support for medical and dental care options for those experiencing homelessness ° Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow operations ° Provide support for programs providing outreach services to address the needs of those living on unsheltered life ° Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services 5) Behavioral Health: Provide support for low-income and vulnerable populations experiencing behavioral health concerns such as substance abuse disorders and mental health challenges. Strategies: ° Expand treatment options, counseling support, and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis 6) Administration To support the administration, coordination, and management of Salt Lake [ity's CDB6. ES6' HOME, and HOPVVAprograms. Salt Lake [ity'x strategy for most effectively utilizing HUD funding is heavily influenced by the Oty'x housing market study,the City's Five Year Housing Plan,the annual Utah Comprehensive Report on v�r o g c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Homelessness, and the adopted Salt Lake City Master Plans that highlight strategic neighborhood investment opportunities. 3' Evaluation ofpast performance Salt Lake City deliberately monitors the process of advancing the strategic goals outlined in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan.This plan, like the previous Consolidated Plan was developed with input from many stakeholders, and it is our responsibility to report back to the U.S. Department of Housing& Urban Development(HUD),the residents, the community, and decision makers,the impact of these funds.As vvenearcomp|etionofthe202U-lO21Annua| AcionP|an' hereisaneva|uodonofprogressduringthat time. In preparation for development of the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan,Salt Lake City's Housing and Neighborhood Development(HAND)division reviewed Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Repnrts(CAPEK$submittedtoHUDunderthe2O15-2O19Conso|idatedP|an' aswaUaspuiNt-indmedato for the 202O-2OZ1 CAPER,to be submitted to HUD afterjuly 1,2021.The CAPERs provide an evaluation of past performance and accomplishments in relation to established goals and priorities.The City's previous Action Plans and CAPERS can be viewed at . During the 2015'201g Consolidated Plan, and to-date for the 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan, the City has been able tm meet the majority of established goals and priorities. |n addition,the City was able tocomply with statutes and regulations set bvHUD. SALT LxxsC/r/'s FY2O20'2021ACCOML|SHK8E0TS Goal Description Estimated* Projected** 1 Housing-Expand Housing Options 633 1,033 2 Transportation- Improve Access to Transportation 271 137 3 Community Resiliency- Increase Economic and/or Housing Stability 113 107 |o�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN *Estimated-An estimation affuture accomplishments based on award amounts and historical accomplishment data. °°projeu,d-presumedfinoY accomplishment based oncurrent trends and pomt-in'mnodouz All the goals surrounding homeownership continued to be a struggle as the City experiences a sustained, rapid increase in housing prices and land values.These housing market conditions created challenges on two fronts, 1)finding eligible households who can afford housing units long-term,and 2)finding units available to purchase to utilize for affordable housing. 0ft,n' single-family homes are on the market mere moments before very competitive offers come in. Unfortunately, municipalities are not set up to quickly react as housing becomes available.This often means that the City ends up paying more for a unit that requires rehabilitation to bring it up to city code.These increased costs must be carefully weighed as housing can easily out-price available federal subsidies and regulatory limitations. In 2016,the City launched a new economic development program to address the fa�acles of businesses within a geographic target area of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan.The reception of the program and impact has been overwhelmingly positive, even though our initial projections proved to be optimistic for a new program. Over the past several years,the City has taken a different approach to homeless services.This includes making a commitment of over$2 million from general fund sources.As homelessness continues to be an issue that needs to be addressed,the City took the approach of shifting many of the service providers from this competitive annual process to the general fund. Additionally, Salt Lake City has further invested general fund dollars into homeless services and housing stabilization through the Funding Our Future sales tax increase initiative. This shift allowed the City to invest significantly more funding, provide local direction, closely monitor performance measurements,and provide flexibility that makes sense for the local challenges we face. It is important to reiterate that the City continues to be committed to providing and expanding services for the homeless population. This also means that federal resources are being diverted to address other Consolidated Plan goals,while the City is taking the opportunity to leverage local resources. However, providing public services to our community fell short in previous years. Over the past few years, the City modified its strategy for spending in this category, providing more services to a smaller group of people that are in greatest need. While this was asuccessful strategy, ensuring the most vulnerable were served' [OV|D has created a substantial increase in the number of residents served under public services SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN over the past year. This trend is likely to continue in the coming year, as we move into the recovery phase of the pandemic. Salt Lake City will soon be receiving final reports regarding program year 2020-2021 funding.This data will inform future decisions about funding allocations.This data will also be fully reflected in the upcoming Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation and Report([APER). 4'Summary mf citizen participation process and consultation process Citizen participation is an integral part of the Consolidated Plan &Annual Action Plan planning process, as it ensures goals and priorities are defined in the context of the community needs and preferences. In addition,the citizen participation process provides a format to educate the community about the City's federal grant programs.To this end' Salt Lake City solicited involvement from a diverse group of stakeholders and community members during the development of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan.A comprehensive public engagement process included a citywide survey(including 2,000+ respondents), public hearings, public meetings, one-on-one meetings, stakeholder committee meetings,task force meetings, Salt Lake City internal technical committee meetings,and a public comment period. In total, over4'OU0 residents participated in providing input into the Consolidated Plan.The City received input and buy'inhonn residents. homeless service providers, low-income service providers' anti'pwverty advocates, healthcare providers, housing advocates, housing developers, housing authorities, community development organizations, educational institutions,transit authority planners, City divisions and departments, among others. For this 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan,the City conducted a Community Engagement Survey to collect public input on their top priorities of the goals identified in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. Due to COVID-1 9 precautions, City Staff worked with a range of community partners to collect mostly electronic responses and targeted safe, in-person responses from vulnerable populations.A total of 879 responses were collected. For more information on the citizen participation efforts, refer to the AP-YO Consultation section. The City held public hearings at different points in the Annual Action Plan process.The General Needs Hearing is an event open to the public to comment on community needs. HAND accepts all comments and looks to understand how federal funding can address these concerns. The concerns that are not within the prevue of the federal funding is passed along to the appropriate City Department.The City 12�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Council Public Hearing is an opportunity for the public and non-profit partners to comment on how federal funding may impact their neighborhoods or the services being provided. More detail about these events are available in the AFcY2 Participation section. 6'Summary mf public comments A summary of the public comments for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan can be found in the appendix of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. All comments received for the Consolidated Plan were considered while creating this 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. On November 5,2020, HAND staff and members of the Community Development and Capital Improvement Program resident advisory board conducted a virtual General Needs Hearing to hear from residents.Although this hearing was publicly noticed, no residents attended. On April 6' ZOZ1. avirtual City Council Public Hearing was held. |n general,the comments were very positive and related to the support of specific agencies. While most comments advocated for a specific organization, many comments cited current demand and proven service models to assist low- incomeandvu|nerab|epopu|admns.Topicsindud,d: home|essness' housing' suppordveservices. domestic violence, and behavioral health services. Additional public comments addressed the need for more federal or City funding to fully fund the applicant's requests and to fund applicants not recommended for funding. These comments have been taken into consideration for the draft of the 2O21-2OZ2 Annual Action Plan.A draft of the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan was publicly noticed and made available onHAND'svvebsite for comments April 29' 2O21 through May 1]' 2O21. Nocomments were received on the draft Plan.A second draft of the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan was publicly noticed and made available on HAND's website for comments May 28, 2021 through June 3, 2021. No comments were received un the second draft Plan. |s�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN PR-05 LEAD IS RESPONUSEIN E AGENCIES 91.20O(b) 1'Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan Describe the agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. Agency Role Name Department/Agency CDBG Administrator SALT LAKE CITY Housing and Neighborhood Development Division HOPWA Administrator SALT LAKE CITY Housing and Neighborhood Development Division HOME Administrator SALT LAKE CITY Housing and Neighborhood Development Division ESG Administrator SALT LAKE CITY Housing and Neighborhood Development Division Narrative(optional) Salt Lake City was the sole agency responsible for developing the Consolidated Plan and is solely responsible for the subsequent Annual Action Plans. Salt Lake City administers each of the HUD grant programs and the funding sources. Annual Action Plan Public Contact Information ° LaniEggertsen-Gof[ Director of Housing and Neighborhood Development, o/O01-S35-6240. ° Jennifer Schumann, Deputy Director, or80l-535-7276. * Tony Milner, Po|icy& Program Manager, or801-535-6168. * Heather Roya||, Community Development Grant Supervisor, or]85- Q77-0035. Salt Lake City Housing and Neighborhood Development 451 South State Street, Room 445 P.U. Box 145488 Salt Lake City, UT84114'548D 14�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-10 CONSULTATION 01]00 91200(b). 01J15(l) Introduction The City engaged in an in-depth and collaborative effort to consult with City departments, representatives of low- income neighborhoods, non-profit and for-profit housing developers,service providers,social service agencies, homeless shelter and service providers' supportive housing and service providers' community stakeholders, community partners,and beneficiaries of entitlement programs to inform and develop the priorities and strategies contained within the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. Salt Lake City continues to engage these critical partners regularly aswe look Lo maximize our potential impact nnan annual basis. Provide aconcise summary wf the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91'215(1)) Salt Lake City is in regular communication with our regional funding partners Salt Lake County' Salt Lake County Continuum of Care, and the State of Utah to coordinate about available funding, and gaps in funding and/or services. During the State of Utah 2O21 Legislative Session, HAND and other City key staff worked closely with regional planning groups, such as the Utah League of Cities and Towns,Wasatch Front Regional Council, Utah Housing Coalition, and the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness, as well as local service providers who provide services to individuals experiencing homelessness and/or behavioral health. New legislation and funding in 2021 included: $50 million in new State funding for homeless service and affordable housing projects, the creation of a new State Homeless Services Office and a new Homeless Services Coordinator for the State, rental expenses disclosure requirements,a transit reinvestment zone, and lead exposure education. The City is also a key participant in Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness and Salt Lake County Continuum of Care.The Coalition help coordinate the Homeless Resource Centers, homeless supportive services'and affordable housing for homeless individuals in Salt Lake County with the goal of making homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring. HAND staff participate with the Coalition's Steering Committee, and Housing Inventory,Winter Overflow Shelter, and Vaccine Coordination sub-committees. HAND staff also participate with the Utah Homeless Management Information Services(HMIS)Steering Committee, and the HOPWA Steering Committee. 15�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Describe coordination with the Continuum mf Care and efforts tm address the needs mfhomeless persons(particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children,veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk mfhomelessness Salt Lake City representatives actively participated in the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness(SLVCEH), the entity responsible for oversight of the Continuum of Care([oQ. SLVCEH'a primary goal isto end homelessness in Sa|tLakeVa||eythroughasystem+midecomnnitmentofresources' services' datoco||ection. ana|ysis' and coordination among all stakeholders.The Coalition gathers community consensus to create and fulfill established outcomes. Using these goals,the Coalition partners with key stakeholders to fill the needs of the Salt Lake County Valley community. City representatives serve on the SLVCEH Steering Committee and sub-committees, and actively participated in meetings and efforts. Salt Lake City representatives participate in the local Continuum of Care's(CoQ executive board and its prioritization committee specifically, so the Continuum of Care's priorities are considered during Emergency Solutions Grant allocations.Also,the three local Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG)funders meet regularly to coordinate ESG and [o[ activities to make sure service are not being over or under funded and services being funded meet the community's needs and goals. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how tmallocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate outcomes mf projects amd activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the operation and administration ofHK8US Allocate ESG Funds Salt Lake City representatives participate in the local Continuum of Care's executive board and its prioritization committee specifically, so the Continuum of Care's priorities are considered during Emergency Solutions Grant allocations.Also,the three local ESG funders meet regularly to coordinate ESG and CoC activities to make sure service are not being over or underfunded and services being funded meet the community's needs and goals. Develop Performance Standards and Evaluate Outcomes The Salt Lake Continuum of Care and the three ESG funders share common measures to evaluate service providers. The three entities also share monitoring results ofsub/ecipienLs. Develop Funding, Policies and Procedures for the Administration of HIMIS |6�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The Salt Lake Continuum of Care contracts with the State of Utah to administer the Homeless Management Information System (HM|S).A|| service agencies in the state are under uniform data standard for HUD reporting and local ESGfunders.All ESG funded organizations participate in HK4|S. For the Oty's2028 Community Engagement Survey, HAND staff worked closely with a diverse range ofcommunity councils, non-profit service providers and community partners to help distribute and collect survey responses.The survey was available in English and Spanish, both online and a paper version, and targeted engagement included: low-income populations, racial and ethnic minority populations, minority Chambers of Commerce, Spanish speaking communities, CDBG West Side Target Area communities (refer to the AP-50 Geogrophicol Distribution section), vulnerable populations, and individuals experiencing homelessness. Over 100 community partners were engaged. Listed in the table below isa sample of the community partners. TABLE:CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PARTICIPANTS ENGAGEMENT COMMUNITY PARTNERS � Agency/Group/Organization Refugee and Immigration Center Asian Association of Utah Agency/G/oup/0rganizadonType Services Refugees What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/0rganization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. � Agency/Group/Organization ASSIST Agency/Group/DrganizadonType Services Persons with Disabilities, Housing What section mf the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment, Non-Homeless Needs consultation? How was the Ageng/Group/Organizadon Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. � Agency/Group/Organization Columbus Community Center Agency/Group/OrgonizationType Services Employment, Persons with Disabilities |7�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/0/ganizadon Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting, From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization ComunidadesUnidas Ageng/6roup/OrganizationType Services-Ladnx Health,Community Engagement What section mf the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organizadon Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. � Agency/Group/Organization Community Development Corporation, Utah ADeng/Group/OrganizadonType Services' Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment consultation? How was the Ageng/Group/0rganization Public Service Organization that assisted inidentifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those weare assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. � Agency/Group/Organization Community Health Center ofUtah AOency/6roup/OrganizationType Services Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Ageng/Group/0rganization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation o/areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest 10 those vve are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Disability Law Center 18�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Agency/Group/0rganizationType Services Law, Persons with Disabilities What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Urganizahon Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those vve are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. � Agency/Group/Organization Donated Dental AgengVG/oup/OrganizadonType Services Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs Families with Children, Non-Homeless consultation? Special Needs How was the Ageng/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. � Agency/Group/Organization First Step House Ageng/G/oup/DrganizadonType Services Housing, Persons with Disabilities, Homeless, Health What section mf the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment, Homeless Needs Chronically consultation? Homeless, Homeless Needs Vete/ans, Homeless Strategy, Non-Homeless Special Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organizadon Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 10 Agency/Group/Organization Habitat for Humanity Ageng/Group/0rganizationType Services Housing What section mf the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organizadon Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation o/areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those weare assisting. From these efforts'the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of 19�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Salt Lake County Housing Authority DBA Housing Connect Ageng/Group/0rganizadonType Services Housing, Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment, Homeless Strategy consultation? How was the Agen0/Group/Urganizadon Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination7 closest to those weare assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 12 Agency/Group/Organization N1a|iheh Free Clinic Ageng/Group/OrganizationType Services Health, Refugees What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/0rganizadon Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 13AgungVGroup/Organizadon Neighbo/VYorks Salt Lake Ageng/Group/OrganizadonType Services Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment consultation? How was the Agency/Group/0rganizadon Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those vve are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 14Ageng/Group/Drganizaiion Salt Lake City Housing Authority Agenq/6roup/OrganizationType Services Housing, Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment, Homeless Strategy consultation? How was the Ageng/Group/Urganization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the on�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN outcomes of the consultation or areas for closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City improved coordination? was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 15Ageng/6roup/Organization Salt Lake County Aging and Adult Services Ageng/Group/OrganizadonType Services Seniors,Aging Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the AgengyGroup/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those vve are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 16Kgeng/Group/Organizahon Shelter the Homeless AgengVG/oup/OrganizadonType Services Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment, Homeless Strategy, Homeless consultation? Needs'Chronically Homeless How was the Ageng/6roup/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 17Agenq/6roup/Or8anization South Valley Services Agency/G/oup/DrganizationType Services Domestic Violence What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Ageng/Group/Organizadon Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 18A8ency/Group/Dr8anization Utah Community Action Agency/Group/OrganizationType Services Housing, Food Bank, Early Education What section mf the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment, Homeless Strategy,Anti-Poverty consultation? Strategy 21 �rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN How was the Agency/G/oup/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 19A8engVGroup/Dr8anization Volunteers ofAmerica Utah Ageng/Group/DrganizadonType Services Housing, Persons with Disabilities, Homeless, Health What section of the Plan was addressed hy Housing Needs Assessment, Homeless Needs Chronically consultation? Homeless, Homeless Needs Families with Children, Homeless Needs Veterans, Homeless Needs Unaccompanied Youth, Homeless Strategy,Anti-Poverty Strategy How was the Agency/G/oup/O/ganization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 20A8ency/Group/Or8anization Young VVomen's Christian Association Ageng/Group/0/ganizadonType Services Housing,Children,Victims of Domestic Violence, Homeless,Victims What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs Families with Children, Homeless Strategy, consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs How was the Agen0/Group/0rganization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able io determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Salt Lake City continues to monitor broadband needs and barriers for low-to moderate-income households. In the City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, section MA-60: Broadband Needs of Housing Occupied by Low-and Moderate-income Households, Salt Lake City identified underserved communities and those without access to the internet.The accessibility, speed and affordability of devices and connections that facilitate internet broadband are crucial factors for low-income households in relation to remote work and schooling, access to health providers, and applications for benefits and resources. In Salt Lake City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan goal of Build Community Resiliency, Salt Lake City included the strategy wf promoting digital inclusion through access todigital communication technologies and the internei. 22�r o , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN As our community faces challenges that hinder economic mobility, education, access to technology and increase food insecurity. Service providers, industry experts, data analysis, community members, and elected officials all agree that providing support for these efforts will enhance community resiliency as we look to improve access to critical services and rebuild from national, state or local emergencies. In Salt Lake [ity's2030'ZO24[onso|idatedP|an. resi|iencywesidentifiedintheBui|dComrnunityResi|iencygoa|' to expand opportunities for individuals and households living in poverty or in the cycle of intergenerationa| poverty. Strategies around this goal include services to expand accessibility to employment opportunities, improve and enhance small businesses, promote access to early childhood education, expand the availability of digital technologies, and reduce food insecurities. Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting: All agency types were invited to participate in the Annual Action Plan process. Other|mcaU/reginma|/state/federa| planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan TABLE:PLAN CONSULTATION COMMUNITY PLAN CONSULTATIONS � Name mfP|an 10Year Plan to End Chronic Homele ssness Lead Organization State ofUtah How do the goals of Created in 2004, updated in 2013,this plan highlights initiatives centered on using your Strategic Plan the Housing First Model to end chronic homelessness.This plan places minimal overlap with the goals restriction on persons to place them into safe housing. Housing goals include of each plan? promoting the construction of safe,decent,and affordable homes for all income levels and to put specific emphasis on housing homeless persons. Name ofPlan Annual Point-in-TimeCount Lead Organization State ofUtah How do the goals of This plan highlights an initiative to find homeless persons living on the streets and your Strategic Plan gather information in order to connect them with available services. By doing so, overlap with the goals this will help po|icymakers and program administrators set benchmarks to of each plan? measure progress toward the goal of ending homelessness, help plan services and programs to appropriately address local needs, identify strengths and gaps in a community's current homelessness assistance system, inform public opinion, increase public awareness, attract resources,and create the most reliable estimate of people experiencing homelessness throughout Utah. N of Growing i SL[ � Name n� Lead Organization Salt Lake City How do the goals of Policy solutions over the five year period of this plan will focus on: 1)updates to your Strategic Plan zoning code,2) preservation of long-term affordable housing,3)establishment of 2s�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN overlap with the goals a significant funding source,4)stabilizing low-income tenants,5)innovation in of each plan? design,6)partnerships and collaboration in housing,and 7)equitability and fair housing. 4 Name ofPlan Salt Lake City Master Plans Lead Organization Salt Lake City How do the goals of Salt Lake City's master plans provide vision and goals for future development in your Strategic Plan the City.The plans guide the development and use of land, as well asprovide overlap with the goals recommendations for particular places within the City. HAND utilized the City's of each plan? master plans to align policies,goals,and priorities. Name of Plan Salt Lake Valley Coalition u/ End Homelessness Lead Organization Salt Lake County How do the goals of This plan emphasizes the promotion ofa community-wide commitment tothe your Strategic Plan goal of ending homelessness, provide funding for efforts to quickly re-house overlap with the goals individuals and families who are homeless,which minimizes the trauma and of each plan? dislocation caused by homelessness, promote access to and effective use of mainstream programs,optimize self-sufficiency among individuals and families experiencing homelessness 6 NameofP|an State of Ut h Strategic Plan Homele ssness Lead Organization State ofUtah How do the goals of The strategic plan establishes statewide goals and benchmarks on which to your Strategic Plan measure progress toward these goals.The plan recognizes that every community overlap with the goals in Utah is different in their challenges, resources available,and needs of those of each plan? who experience homelessness. 7 Name of Plan Strategic Economic Development Pla n Lead Organization Salt Lake City Economic Development How do the goals of The Strategic Plan establishes an assessment of existing economic conditions of your Strategic Plan Salt Lake City through analysis of quantitative and qualitative data.This overlap with the goals information guided a strategic framework that builds onexisting strengths and of each plan? seeks to overcome identified challenges to ensure the City's fiscal health,enhance its business dimate,and promote economic growth. Name ofPlan Housing Gap Coalition Report Lead Organization Salt Lake Chamber How do the goals of Initiative that seeks to safeguard Utah's economic prosperity by ensuring home your Strategic Plan ownership is attainable and housing affordability isa priority, protecting Uiahns overlap with the goals quality of life and expanding opportunities for all. of each plan? 9 Name ofPlan Housing Affordability Crisis Lead Organization Kern [. Gardner Policy Institute How do the goals of Policy brief regarding the current and projected state of rising housing prices in your Strategic Plan Utah and recommendations regarding what todo about it. o*�r o g c SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN overlap with the goals of each plan? 251 P ag e SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-12 PARTICIPATION 91]05,91200(c) 1'Summary wf citizen participation process/Efforts made tq broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting The City seeks to develop and enhance livable, healthy, and sustainable neighborhoods through robust planning and actions that reflect the needs and values of the local community.The City has stayed true to its values of inclusiveness and innovation by embracing opportunities to provide equitable services, offer funding, and create housing opportunities that improve lives for individuals and families in underserved and under'/exourcedcommunities. The City recognizes that citizen participation is critical for the development of a Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans that reflects the needs of affected persons and residents. In accordance with 24 CFR y1.1O5'the City solicited robust citizen participation. For the 202U-2O24 Consolidated Plan, between May ZO10 and May 2O20' over 4'0OOresidents, stakeholders, agency partners,and City officials participated through proactive, community-based outreach,facilitated stakeholder engagement,and online surveys.The City involved affected persons and residents through stakeholder consultation, a community survey, community events, public meetings, public hearings, public comment periods, and one-on-one consultations.The full details of these efforts can be found in the City's 2020-2024 Consolidated and 2020-2024 Citizen Participation Plan. For the 2021-2O22 Annual Action Plan, between July 2020to October 2O2U. HAND staff conducted a survey to engage members of the public and receive input on how federal funding could be prioritized. In the past HAND staff would attend up to 20 in-person community events and collect an average of 1,200 responses per year. Due to COVID-1 9 precautions, HAND staff worked with the City's Civic Engagement team and pivoted to an online community engagement survey, reaching out electronically to Salt Lake City's resident, Recognized Community Organizations, and over 100 non-profits and community partners. The survey was offered in English and Spanish.Additionally,to hear from vulnerable populations without access to computers, paper versions of the survey were safely collected at the Homeless Resources Centers, two adult Detox locations, the Homeless Youth Resource Center,the Sorensen Community Center,and two local food banks.A total ofD79 responses were received. o6�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The public was asked to give input on their top priorities of the goals identified in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. Priority ranking for each goal of the Consolidate Plan were provided,as follows: Housing Build new affordable housing and homeownership for low income populations.Transportation Provide transit passes to low-income populations. Build Community Resiliency Provide access iw affordable and healthy food. Homeless Services Homeless Resources Centers operations and emergency shelter. Behavioral Health Resources for individuals with Buhvuria| health needs.The CD-OP and HTFAB Boards considered these priorities and how they align with the goals of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan when identifying projects to be recommended for 2021-2022. TABLE:CITIZEN PARTICIPATION OUTREACH SUMMARY CHART Summary of Summary of Summary of Mode of Effort Target of Response/At Comments Comments Outreach Outreach tendance Received not Accepted &Reasons Internet Outreach Survey- Electronic Minorities; 741 Respondents All responses Non-English Respondents ranked were taken Speaking; homeless and into Spanish; affordable consideration Persons with housing as the Annual Disabilities,- services as Action Plan Non- their top developed. Targeted/Bro priorities for ad City services. community; Other residents of priorities Public and included Assisted transit passes, Housing affordable and healthy food and behavioral health In-Person Survey- Paper Individuals 138 paper Respondents All responses Outreach Form Experiencing responses ranked were taken Homelessnes homeless and into s, Individuals affordable consideration Receiving housing as the Annual Detox services as Action Plan Treatment their top developed. priorities for City services. Other priorities included 27�ro , c SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Summary of Summary of Summary of Mode of Effort Target of Response/At Comments Comments Outreach Outreach tenclance Received not Accepted &Reasons transit passes, affordable and healthy food assistance, and behavioral health resources. Public Hearing General Needs Minorities; No members No responses No responses Remote Public Non-English of the public from the from the Hearing Speaking; attended this public were public were Spanish; hearing. provided. provided. (Due to COVID-1 9 Persons with precautions,this Disabilities; Public Hearing was Non- publicly noticed in Targeted/Bro English and ad Spanish, held community; remotely on residents of WebEx. Options to Public and submit comments Assisted via phone, email, Housing or mail,and ADA accommodations were offered.) Public Hearing Annual Action Plan City 16 members Most All comments Remote Public Councilmemb of the public comments were Hearing ers, City staff, attended advocated for accepted and Minorities; and/or a specific taken into (Due to COVI D-1 9 Non-English provided organization consideration precautions,this Speaking; comments at Topics as the Annual Public Hearing was Spanish; this hearing. included: Action Plan publicly noticed in Persons with homelessness was English and Disabilities; , housing, developed. Spanish, held Non- supportive remotely on Targeted/Bro services, DV, WebEx. Options to ad and submit comments community; behavioral via phone,email, residents of health or mail,and ADA Public and services, accommodations Assisted Additional were offered.) Housing comments addressed the need for more federal or City funding to 28 Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Summary of Summary of Summary of Mode of Effort Target of Response/At Comments Comments Outreach Outreach tendance Received not Accepted &Reasons fund requests. Public Notice Annual Action Plan Minorities; No members No responses No responses (Draft Version) Non-English of the public from the from the Public Notice Speaking; provided public were public were Spanish; responses. provided. provided. Persons with Disabilities; Non- Targeted/Bro ad community; residents of Public and Assisted Housing AP-15 EXPECTED RESOURCES 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction TABLE:EXPECTED RESOURCES Expected Amount Available-Year 2 Expected Uses of Amount Funding Annual Program Prior Year Total Available- Description Allocation Income Resources Remainder of Con Plan Acquisition Expected Amount is a Administration rounded ................................................................. estimation of Economic the funding Development anticipated Homebuyer to be Assistance received, co r) $3,570,517 $0 $572,667 $4,091,332 $10,500,000 Homeowner based on Rehabilitation current ................................................................. Multifamily Program Rental Year Construction- --....- ..-1. ..- allocation. Multifamily Prior year Public resources Improvements are unspent .................................................................. 29 I 11 a , e SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Expected Amount Available-Year 2 Expected Uses of Amount Funding Annual Program Prior Year Total Available- Description Allocation Income Resources Remainder of Con Plan Public Services funds from previous ................................................................. Rental years. Rehabilitation New Construction for Ownership TBRA Historic Rental Rehabilitation New Construction Acquisition Expected Amount is a Administration rounded estimation of Homebuyer the funding Assistance anticipated Homeowner to be Rehabilitation received, Multifamily based on Rental current ................................................................. Construction Program 0 Multifamily $974,863 $674,926 $0 $1,649,789 $2,900,000 Year r -Rental allocation. Rehabilitation Program -New income is Construction typically for Ownership generated from housing loan TBRA repayments from nonprofit agencies. Administration Financial Prior year Assistance resources 0 Overnight are unspent Ln $299,267 $0 $9,450 $308,717 $900,000 LU Shelter funds from ................................................................. Rapid Re- previous Housing years. (Rental Assistance) 30 I 11 a , e SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Expected Amount Available-Year 2 Expected Uses of Amount Funding Annual Program Prior Year Total Available- Description Allocation Income Resources Remainder of Con Plan Rental Assistance Services Transitional Housing Administration Permanent Expected Housing in Amount is a Facilities rounded Permanent estimation of Housing the funding Placement anticipated STRMU to be ................................................................. received, < Short-Term or based on a- Transitional $674,671 $0 $0 $674,671 $2,025,000 current 0 T_ Housing Program Facilities Year Supportive allocation. Services Prior year resources are unspent funds from TBRA previous yea rs. Acquisitions Administration Between The ................................................................. Conversion Housing and Rehab for Development o Transitional Trust Fund z D Housing and Funding L.L Homebuyer Our Future, LO L D Rehabilitation there is an LU � = Housing $2,590,000 $0 $0 $2,590,000 $7,770,000 annual 0 Multifamily budget of z Rental New $2.59M.This o Construction is expected 0 ............................................................... Multifamily to be an Rental Rehab ongoing ....................................................... New annual Construction allocation. for Ownership 31 I 11 a , e SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Expected Amount Available-Year 2 Expected Uses of Amount Funding Annual Program Prior Year Total Available- Description Allocation Income Resources Remainder of Con Plan Permanent Housing in Facilities Rapid Re- Housing Rental Assistance TBRA Transitional Housing All CDBG Eligible Activities per < Salt Lake City 0 u-j Housing Housing =0 2 Program Rules laf Z All HOME LU Program Eligible Income 0 Activities per Housing Program Rules z The fund has a current < allocation of $2M and an z estimated LU remaining j Economic > Development LU the process of being z so these U numbers LU may change LU in the future. Source:Salt Lake City Division vr Housing and Neighborhood Development Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources(private, state and local fumds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied HUD, like many other federal agencies, encourages the recipients of federal monies to demonstrate that efforts are being made to strategically leverage additional funds to achieve greater results. Matches 32�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN require subrecipients toproduceaspecificannountoffundingthatwiU ^match^1heamoun1ofprog/am funds available. ° HOME Investment Partnership Program -2596 Match Requirement Salt Lake City will have no HOME match requirements for 2021-2O2l |naUS Dept of Housing& Urban Development memo from John Gibbs,Acting Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development(D), dated April 10, 2020, re:Availability of Waivers and Suspensions of the HOME Program Requirements in Response to COVID-1 9 Pandemic, Salt Lake City intends to continue utilizing the waiver and suspension of HOME match requirements. As per section#4 of the above mentioned memo, Matching Contribution Requirements,given the urgent housing and economic needs created by COVID-1 9,and substantial financial impact the Participating jurisdiction (PJ)will face in addressing those needs,wavier of these regulations(24 CFR 92.218 and 92.222(b))will relieve the PJ from the need to identify and provide matching contributions to HOME projects ° Emergency Solutions Grant- 1U096 Match Requirement Salt Lake City will ensure that ESG match requirements are met by utilizing the leveraging capacity ofits suberantees. Funding sources used to meet the ESG match requirements include federal, state and local grants; private contributions; private foundations; United Way; Continuum of Care funding; City General Fund; in-kind match and unrestricted donations. Fund Levera"n Leverage, in the context of the City's four HUD Programs, means bringing other local, state,and federal financial resources to maximize the reach and impact of the City's HUD Programs. Resources for leverage include the following: ^ Housing Choice Section OVouchers ° Low Income Housing Tax Credits ~ New Market Tax Credits ° RDA Development Funding ° Salt Lake City Housing Trust Fund (HTF) ° Salt Lake City Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF) ° Salt Lake City General Fund g�r o g c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ~ O|ene Walker Housing Loan Fund ~ Industrial &Commercial Bank Funding * Continuum wf Care Funding � Foundations &Other Philanthropic Partners If appropriate, describe publicly owned land mr property located within the jurisdiction that may be used tm address the needs identified in the plan Salt Lake City intends to expand affordable housing and economic development opportunities through theredeve|upmentofCity/owned |and' stnategic |andaoquisitions. uxpansionufthe [ommunityLand Trust for affordable housing, parcel assembly, and disposition.The Housing and Neighborhood Development Division will work collaboratively with other City Divisions that oversee or control parcels that are owned by the City to evaluate the appropriateness for affordable housing opportunities. Discussion: Salt Lake City will continue to seek other federal, state and private funds to leverage entitlement grant funding. In addition, the City will support the proposed community development initiatives outlined in this Plan through strategic initiatives, policies, and programs. a4�rogc SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-20 AN N UAL GOAL & STRATEG I ES TABLE:GOALS,PRIORITY NEEDS AND OUTCOME INDICATORS Star End Geogra Priority Goal Sort Order Goal t Year Category phic Needs Funding Outcome Year Area Addressed Indicator 1 - Housing Expand housing 2021 2022 Affordable Citywid Affordable CDBG $2,087,652 1,149 options Housing e Housing Househol ESG $82,022 ds HOME $1,552,303 assisted HOPWA$604,431 2- Improve access 2021 2022 Transportati Citywid Transporta CDBG $560,950 271 Transportati to transportation on e tion Househol on ds assisted 3- Increase 2021 2022 Economic Target Communit CDBG $694,700 551 Community economic and/or Developme Areas/C y Individual Resiliency housing stability nt/Public itywide Resiliency s or Services businesse s assisted 4- Ensure that 2021 2022 Public Citywid Homeless CDBG $250,300 1,862 Homeless homelessness is Services/Ho e Services Persons Services brief, rare, and meless ESG $164,250 assisted non-recurring Services 5- Support 2021 2022 Public Citywid Behavioral CDBG $48,000 259 Behavioral vulnerable Services/Be e Health Househol Health populations havioral HOPWA$50,000 ds experiencing Health assisted substance abuse and mental health challenges 6- Administration 2021 2022 Administrati Citywid Administra CDBG $703,733 N/A Administrati on e tion on ESG $22,445 HOME $97,486 HOPWA$20,240 35 I 11 a , e SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Goal Descriptions TABLE GOAL DESCRIPTIONS Goal Name Goal Description 1 Housing To provide expanded housing options for all economic and demographic segments of Salt Lake City's population while diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. • Support housing programs that address the needs of aging housing stock through targeted rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within the neighborhoods • Support affordable housing development that increases the number and types of units available for qualified residents • Support programs that provide access to home ownership • Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and/or end homelessness • Support programs that provide connection to permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs • Provide housing and essential supportive services to persons with HIV/AIDS 2 Transportation To promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal transportation options. • Within eligible target areas, improve bus stop amenities to encourage the accessibility of public transit and enhance the experience of public transit • Within eligible target areas, expand and support the installation of bike racks, stations,and amenities to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation • Support access to transportation, prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations 3 Community Resiliency Provide tools to increase economic and/or housing stability • Support job training and vocational rehabilitation programs that increase economic mobility • Improve visual and physical appearance of deteriorating commercial buildings- limited to CDBG Target Area • Provide economic development support for microenterprise businesses • Direct financial assistance to for-profit businesses • Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement, social development, and change the cycle of poverty • Promote digital inclusion through access to digital communication technologies and the internet • Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population 4 Homeless Services To expand access to supportive programs that help ensure that homelessness is rare, brief,and non-recurring • Expand support for medical and dental care options for those experiencing homelessness 36I P ag e SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Goal Name Goal Description • Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency Overflow Operations • Provide support for programs undertaking outreach services to address the needs of those living an unsheltered life • Expand case management support to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services 5 Behavioral Health To provide support for low-income and vulnerable populations experiencing behavioral health concerns such as substance abuse disorders and mental health challenges. Expand treatment options,counseling support, and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis 6 Administration To support the administration,coordination,and management of Salt Lake AP-35 PROJECTS (Summary) 91.20O(d) Introduction The goals and strategies outlined in Salt Lake Oty's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan serve as the foundation for program year 2021-2022 projects and activities.The Consolidated Plan encourages building resiliency in low-income areas by investing in economic development,and transportation infrastructure.These two categories of projects/activities will be limited to the West Side CDBG Target Area.The Consolidated Plan also addresses the need to utilize federal funding to further support housing,transportation, building community resiliency, homeless services, and behavioral health.The Consolidated Plan goals will be supported through the following 2021-2022efforts: This Year-2 Annual Action Plan establishes and addressed several Goals and Strategies as outlined in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. It is recoznized that not every strategy will be accessed each year, however, each year there will be projects that move forward each of the goals identified. Housing: Provide expanded housing options for all economic and demographic segments of Salt Lake[ity/s population while diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. Strategies: " Support housing programs that address the needs of aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods ° Expand housing support for aging residents that ensure access to continued stable housing ° Support affordable housing development that increases the number and types of units available for income eligible residents a7�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ° Support programs that provide access to home ownership via down payment assistance, and/or housing subsidy, and/or financing " Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and end homelessness " Support programs that provide connection to permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs. Support may include, but is not limited to supporting obtaining housing via deposit and rent assistance and barrier elimination 1othe extent allowable Lo regulation ° Provide housing and essential services for persons with H|V/A|DS Transportation: Promote accessibility and affordability ofmnu|tirnmda|transportation options. Strategies: ~ Improve bus stop amenities to encourage the accessibility of public transit and enhance the experience of public transit in target areas ~ Support access to transportation prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations ° Expand and support the installation of bike racks, stations, and amenities to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation in target areas Build Community Resiliency: Build resiliency by providing tools to increase economic and/or housing stability. Strategies: " Provide job training/vocational training programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations including, but not limited to; chronically homeless;those exiting treatment centers/programs and/or institutions; and persons with disabilities ° Economic Development efforts via supporting the improvement and visibility of small businesses through fa�ade improvement programs ° Provide economic development support for microent,/prisebusinesses " Direct financial assistance Lo for-profit businesses ° Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement, social development, and change the cycle ofpoverty ° Promote digital inclusion through access to digital communication technologies and the int,rnet " Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population Homeless Services: Expand access supportive programs that help ensure that homelessness is rare, brief, and non-recurring. Strategies: ° Expand support for medical and dental care options for those experiencing homelessness " Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow operations ° Provide support for programs providing outreach services to address the needs of those living an unsheltered life " Expand case management support to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services ao�r o g c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Behavioral Health: Provide support for low-income and vulnerable populations experiencing behavioral health concerns such as substance abuse disorders and mental health challenges. Strategies: ° Expand treatment options, counseling support, and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis A6nm|nistratiom —Tosuppor11headministradnn' conrdinaLion' andmanagementnfSa|tLake [ity's [DBG' ESG. HOME, and HOPVVAprograms. TABLE: PROJECT NAME # Project Name 1 [DBG: Public Services: Homeless Service Programs [DB6: Public Services: Build Community Resiliency-job Training&Educational 2 Programs 3 CDBG: Public Services: Behavioral Health 4 [DBG: Housing 5 [DBG: Build Community Resiliency Economic Development 6 [DB6: Public Services:Transportation 7 CDBG:Transportation 8 {DBG:Administration 9 ESG21: Salt Lake City 10 HOME:Tenant Based Rental Assistance 11 HOME: Down Payment Assistance 12 HOME: Salt Lake City Home Development Fund 13 HOME:Administration 14 HOPVVA21: Salt Lake City 39 ro c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-38 PROJECTS (Table) TABLE: PROJECT SUMMARY INFORMATION Project Name CoBs Public Services: Homeless Service Programs Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Homeless Services Needs Addressed nomo|000: Muigauon,provonuon,Public Services ruoumn CoeG:$250,300 Funding for eligible actives that support homeless resource centers,emergency shelters and other mosu,/novn supportive service programs directed»o individuals and families experiencing homelessness.Funding allocations are coordinated with local coCanu sSnonorts. Target Date Matrix Code nnT 1 National Objective LMC Estimate the number and type mfamilies 415 homeless individuals including chronically homeless,victims of domestic violence, persons with that will benefit from disabilities and other vulnerable populations are expected to benefit from proposed activities. the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Activities will provide essential day-to-day services for the city's most vulnerable populations. Funding will*a targeted, inaccnman*awuhmeaunganuunnm|m4uuowe.msupvonmeoxmnicaxyhnmowoa. xomo|oov mmmeo,and victims of domestic violence.Funding is projected to be anmmu:u as follows: The Road Home,Gail Miller Homeless Resource Center,$72.O0o Planned Activities Salt Lake ovnamu memo|Services,Community Dental Project,$44.400 YWCA uf Utah,Women in Jeopardy,$33,900 South Valley Services,Domestic Violence Victim Advocate,$1VO.V0o Project Name oDBa Public Services: Buimcvmmuni/vuesinencv-xvuTmininomEuuouuona|Prvorums Target Area Citywide 2 Goals Supported Build Community Resiliency Needs Addressed Build community resiliency Funding CoeG:$1e4./e9 40�r o , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 000unpno^ Funding for eligible activities that enhance,expand,and improve job training programs m build resiliency and self-sufficiency. Target Date Matrix Code nan National Objective LMC Estimate the number n40 individuals are expected to benefit from proposed activities.This includes low income residents that and type mfamilies that will benefit from are working with existing job training programs for those that are homeless,exiting homelessness or the proposed activities low-income residents and their children. Location Description Citywide with a focus on assisting residents in racial and ethnic concentrated areas of poverty and local target areas. Activities will provide a cost-effective intervention in increasing self-sufficiency for households for those that are low income and/or living inpoverty. Many adults experiencing in,,rgenormunnu|poverty are employed but unable mmeet the needs or their families.Adults and teenagers experiencing intergenerational poverty will be connected to resources that assist them with employment and job training.Funding in projected wbe allocated asfollows: Advantage Services, Provisional Support Employment Program,$su.25n Planned Activities International Rescue Committee(m:).Digital Skills Pnvo,am.$n4.4oV First Step House, Employment Preparation u Placement,$*1.roo meiuhuumouu nouoe.Early Education pmomm^$38,449 Project Name CoBG Public Services: Behavioral Health Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Behavioral noau» Needs Addressed Public Services:Expand Opportunity/Self-Sufficiency Funding CmeG:$48.000 3 oesx,/nnvn Public Service activities that provide a behavioral health component for the City. Target Date Matrix Code 05M National Objective /Mc Estimate the number 2oe adults living a/o,near the poverty level are expected tn benefit from proposed activities.This and type mfamilies inomd�»n,moo�o recent homeless persons vi�imnnfdvmeonc ma��mu�nen�nnm ' ' ' ' the proposed activities violence and other vulnerable adults. Location Description Citywide with a focus nn assisting residents in behavioral health programming. 41 �r o , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Activities will provide access to behavioral health programs,with an added benefit of connection to stable housing opportunities and building*elf-=,si|innov. Planned Activities First Step nvune. Peer Support Services,$48.000 Project Name oDBo: npusino Citywide Target Area West Side Target Area Goals Supported Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Development&Preservation Funding CooS:$2.087.052 oes»,/nu,n Funding for eligible activities that provide housing rehabilitation,emergency home repair,and accessibility modifications for eligible households. Target Date Matrix Code 14x National Objective LMn Estimate the number 369 low and moderate-income households are expected to benefit from proposed activities.Funding will 4 and type mfamilies uo�argo1oumomor|y uioamou low-income, racial/ethnic single-parent,anu|argo'mmi|y ma,wmuonen��om ' ' ' ' ' the proposed activities households.This may include,but is not limited to, multi-family housing or single-family housing. Location Description Citywide with a focus on assisting residents in racial and ethnic concentrated areas of poverty and local target areas. Activities will provide essential housing rehabilitation,emergency repair,and accessibility modifications u,address hoanmoafetyhwonuvo issues for eligible homeowners.Assistance will uo provided as grants o, low-interest loans,Funding in projected wuc allocated aofollows: ASSIST Inc.—Community Design Center,Emergency Home Repair;Accessibility and Community nesign.$7oo.000 Community Development Corp.of Utah,Affordable Housing and Revitalization,$74,800 The Road Home,Palmer Court no»ou.^*1ni.00u p/anneuxonvn/es sLn Housing and moiohuomovu Development,Housing nohammuuon and nonmuuyorpmoram. $*oo.oUo eLc Housing and weiehunmvnu Development,Targeted Repairs Program,$500,000 oLC Housing and Neighborhood Development,Small Repair Program,$sn.onu Set Aside Salt Lake City Housing Project,$o1.oso 42�r o , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Project Name CoBG: Build Community Resiliency'Economic Development Target Area West Side Target Area Goals Supported Build Community Resiliency Needs Addressed Support access to building community resiliency by providing opportunities for small businesses to thrive pvnmnn CmeG:$502.000 000c,/vuvn Funding for eligible activities that provide commercial rehabilitation in local target areas. Target Date Matrix Code 14e National Objective /MA Estimate the number and type mfamilies rnuuninoonoo that wmue�mt�um the proposed activities Location ooripnon raro�odommad`inwn�Side ra��xma Activities will include grants and forgivableloans/grants for businesses located in the West Side target areas to make exterior fagade improvements and to correct code violations. Eligible costs include labor, materials,supplies,and soft costs relating to the commercial rehabilitation, Planned activities are as Planned Activities follows: Salt Lake City Housing and Neighborhood Development:$502,000 Project wum° coBG: Public Services:Transportation Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Transportation Needs Addressed Support access to transportation prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations, by offering reduced-fare transit passes m individuals experiencing homelessness. G Funding CoeC:$34.700 oeou,/noon Funding will be utilized to promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal transportation options. Target Date Matrix Code noE National Objective LMC 4s�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Estimate the number and`— families mes 10mindividva|x ��wn/��m�m the proposed activities Location Citywide. oason;uipn Support access to transportation prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations, by offering reduced-fare transit passes to individuals experiencing homelessness, Planned Activities Salt Lake City Transportation,HIVE Pass Will Call,$4s.uoo Project Name :oBG:Transportation Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Transportation Support access mtransportation prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable pvpu|aoono,by Needs Addressed constructing new bus stnpv,nhn|m,n and related facilities along bus routes through LM|areas of Salt Lake City. punamn CooG:$322.000 000c,/vuon Funding will be uoozuu to promote accessibility and affordability vrmunimoue|transportation options, 7 Target Date Matrix Code 03Z National Objective LMC Estimate the number and type mfamilies xnoaninuiviuue|o that will benefit fr om ' the proposed activities Location Description See map—Selected routes through LM|neighborhoods in Salt Lake City tracts. Planned Activities Funding will be utilized to created bus stops,boarding io|anuo,bus shelters and vo|au,u amoni000,with specific attention to creating accessible bus stops,along routes through LMI areas of the city. Salt Lake City Transportation, Route 4 Frequent Transit Route—Bus Stops&Shelter,$322,000 Project Name CDBG:xdministmuon Target Area N/A 8 Goals Supported Administration Needs Addressed puoamn ooeO:$rna./on 44�r o , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 000unpno^ Funding will be utilized for general management,oversight,and coordination of Salt Lake City's CIDBG program. Target Date Matrix Code 21A National Objective Estimate the number and type ofamilies that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Planned Activities Activities will include program administration and overall program management,coordination, monitoring,reporting and evaluation. Project Name EeGu1 Salt Lake City Target Area Countywide Goals Supported Homeless Services Needs Addressed Homeless: Mitigation,Prevention,Public Services punumo sSG:$308.717 Funding will be utilized for homeless prevention to prevent individuals and families from moving into mosu,/n«vn homelessness,and for rapid re-housing to move families out of homelessness. In addition,funding will be utilized for emergency shelter,shelter diversion,outreach and other essential services for homeless individuals and families. Target Date 9 Matrix Code nnT National Objective LMC Proposed activities will prevent individuals and families from moving into homelessness;provide rapid rehousing to quickly move families out of homelessness;and provide day-to-day services for individuals Estimate the number and families experiencing homelessness asfollows and type mfamilies that will benefit from Part som:Shelter Operations,Outreach,oav-tn-oavServices: 1.44*inuiviuuo|s the proposed activities Part IESG: Pvevenuun,Rapid wehvvsinQ,Diversion: 220inuwuwms Location Description Countywide 1. Activities will prevent household from moving into homelessness and move homeless families quickly into permanent,stable housing through the following eligible costs:utilities, rental application fees,security/utility deposits,rental fees, housing placement fees,housing stability case management, Planned Activities and other eligible costs. Funding io projected muo allocated aofollows: Utah Community Action,Rapid Rehousing pvvs,am.$82.022 45�r o , c SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Utah Community Action,Diversion Program,$40,000 2, Activities will provide emergency shelter and other essential services for individuals and families experiencing homelessness.Services include outpatient health services, homeless resource centers, and transitional housing.Funding is projected to be allocated as follows: First Step House, Homeless Resource Center Behavioral Health Treatment Services,$49.250 Volunteers of America,Utah,Geraldine King Women's Resource Center,$30,000 Volunteers of America,Utah, Homeless Youth Resource Center,$44,000 Catholic Community Services:Weigand Resource Center; Client Intake/Operations,$41,000 3. In addition,$22,445 will be utilized for program administration for general management,oversight, and coordination of the City's ESG program, Project Name HOME:Tenant Based Rental Assistance Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Housing Needs Addressed Access to affordable housing Funding HOME:$367,669 Description Funding will be utilized to provide tenant-based rental assistance housing to homeless and at-risk of homeless individuals and families. 10 Target Date Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from 88 families will benefit from the proposed activities. the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Activities will provide tenant-based rental assistance to homeless,disabled persons and other vulnerable populations.Funding is projected to be allocated as follows: Planned Activities Utah Community Action Program,TBRA:$167,669 The Road Home,TBRA: $200,000 Project Name HOME: Down Payment and Deposit Assistance Target Area Citywide 11 Goals Supported Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Development&Preservation 46 I 11 a , e SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ruou/nn HOmu$2no.00n ono:rinnvn Funding will un utilized tv provide low-interest loans and/or grants for down payment assistance and/or closing costs m eligible»mmouuyero. Target Date Estimate the number and type mfamilies that will benefit from 13 households will benefit from proposed activities. the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Direct financial assistance to eligible homebuyers in the form of down payment low-interest loans and/or grants.Funding io projected mue allocated aofollows: Planned Activities Community Development Corp.of Utah,Down Payment Assistance: $200.000 Project Name HOME:Salt Lake City Home Development Fund Target Area cupwiuo Goals Supported Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Development&Preservation punumo HOME:$9e4.634 12 mosu,/n«vn Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition, new construction,and rehabilitation vf existing housing. Target Date Estimate the number and type mfamilies that will benefit from /u least/households are tn benefit from proposed activities. men,vnooeunct/,u/es Location Description Q,ywmv Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition, new construction,and rehabilitation or multi-family properties and single-family homes. Planned Activities a|u Housing and Neighborhood om".HOME Development Fund:$un*,ax4 Project Name HOME:Administration Target Area Citywide 13 Goals Supported Administration Needs Addressed 47�r o , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ruou/nn HOmu$nr,4n6 Description Funding will be utilized for general management,oversight and coordination of Salt|ax=Ci,yo HOME program. Target Date Estimate the number and type mfamilies that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description p/»nn»a*uuvu/es Activities will include program administration and overall program manaovmont,covndinauon, mvnuoring,reporting and evaluation. Project Name *OpvvA21 Salt Lake City Target Area Metropolitan Statistical Area Goals Supported Housing Needs Addressed Access m affordable housing Funding nOpmw:$0/4.071 Funding will be utilized to provide housing and related services to persons with o|v8A|oS and moi, ooso,/vuvn mmmon Activities include,TnmA.Housing Information Sowoox.Permanent Housing Placement, STnMu,and supportive services, Target Date Persons living with n|v/A|o3 and their families are expected to benefit from the proposed activities as mnuwo: 14 Supportive Services,36 households Estimate the number and type mfamilies that will benefit from the proposed activities SrnMU/p*MGvprom*:Sorvicev.zn households rewx.oVhouseholds Location Description Salt Lake City Metropolitan Statistical Area Activities will inumua nnWoct-uaouu rental assistance,tenant-based rental mnoistanou,short-term rental/mortgage/utility assistance, housing information services,permanent housing placement,and supportive services for persons living with HIV/AIDS and their families.Funding is projected to be allocated anfollows: Housing Authority nf the County nf Salt Lake,TBnA,$4no.an2 Planned Activities Utah Community Action Program,eTmwu.PnP. Supportive Services,$ae.oyy Utah AIDS Foundation,Supportive Services,$xn.noo 48�r o , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Utah AIDS Foundation,Mental Health Servima.$50.mm m addition,Salt Lake City will utilize$2o.24oin program administrationfor general management, oversight and coordination nv the Salt Lake City MSxH0pvvAprogram. Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles tw addressing umdersarved needs As entitlement funding decreased considerably over the past decade, the City is taking a strategic approach to directing funding. Priorities include expanding affordable housing opportunities throughout the City, providing critical services for the City's most vulnerable residents, expanding self-sufficiency for at-risk populations, and improving neighborhood conditions in concentrated areas of poverty. The City and partners are unable to fully address needs due to a lack of funding and resources.To address the lack of resources,the City will continue to engage with community development organizations, housing providers, housing developers, service providers, community councils, City departments, local businesses, residents, and other stakeholders to develop strategies for increasing impacts and meeting gaps in services. AP-50 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION y1.200(U Description of the geographic areas mf the entitlement(including areas mf low-income and minority concentration)where assistance will be directed Locally-defined target areas provide an opportunity to maximize impact and align HUD funding with existing investment while simultaneously addressing neighborhoods with the most severe needs. According to HUD standards, a Local Target Area is designed to allow for a locally targeted approach to the investment ofCD8G and other federal funds. The target area for the entirety of the associated Consolidated Plan period,will be identified as,"West Side Target Area", as shown on the map below. CDBG and other federal funding will be concentrated, but not necessarily limited to,the target area. Neighborhood and community nodes will be identified and targeted to maximized community impact and drive further neighborhood investment. During this Annual Action Plan period, infrastructure projects such as transportation projects and commercial fa�acle 49�r o , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN improvements will be limited to this target area. Housing activities will happen citywide, however,a more concentrated marketing strategy for rehabilitation efforts will be deployed in the West Side Target Area as an opportunity to expand housing stability. FIGURE:2O20-2O24 WEST SIDE CD06T&RQETAREA 2 Miles Legend SLC Target Area Salt Lake City Boundary Salt Lake City's HUD entitlement funds are geographically distributed with the following priorities: The[DBG proDram's primary objective is to promote the development ofviable urban communities by providing decent housing, suitable living environments and expanded economic activities to persons of low-and moderate-income.To support the CDBG program's primary objectives, Salt Lake City is taking a two-pronged approach tm the distribution offunding: 50�r o , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 1. Direct funding to local target areas 10 build capacity and expand resources within concentrated areas of poverty. l Utilize funding citywide, in accordance with meeting a national objective,to support the city's most vulnerable populations, including the chronically homeless, homeless families,food- insecure individuals,the disabled, persons living with H|V/A|DS'vic1ims of domestic violence and the low-income elderly. The ESG progrann's primary objective is to assist individuals and families regain housing stability after experiencing housing or homelessness crisis. E56 funding isdistributed citywide to support emergency shelter, day services, resource centers, rapid re-housing and homeless prevention activities.The majority of funding is target to Salt Lake City's urban core, as this is where the highest concentration of homeless services are located. The HOME program's primary objective is to create affordable housing opportunities for low-income households. HOME funding is distributed citywide to provide direct financial assistance to homebuyers, tenant-based rental assistance, acquisition, and rehabilitation. The HOPWA program's primary objective is to provide housing assistance and related supportive services to persons living with HIV/AIDS and their families. HOPWA funding is distributed throughout the Salt Lake City MSA, including Salt Lake, Summit, and Tooele counties,to provide project-based rental assistance, tenant-based rental assistance, short-term rental assistance, and supportive services.The majority of funding is utilized in Salt Lake County, as the majority of HIV/AIDS services are located in the Salt Lake area. TABLE:GEC|GRPuN|CDISTRIBUTION 1 1 West Side CDEG Target Area 20% Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically The Target Area was identified through an extensive process that analyzed local poverty rates, low-and moderate-incomerates' neiDhborhoodcondidons' ci1izeninputandavai|ab|eresources. A fair housing equity assessment completed in May 2018 by the Kern C. Gardner Policy Institute at the University of Utah states that there is a housing shortage in Utah,with the supply of new homes and 51 �rogc SALT LAME CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN existing"for sale"homes falling short of demand.While the impact of higher housing prices is widespread, affecting buyers,sellers, and renters in all income groups,the report concludes that those households below the median income, and particularly low-income households, are disproportionately hurt by higher housing prices. In fact, households with incomes below the median have a 1 in 5 chance of a severe housing cost-burden, paying at least 50%of their income toward housing,while households with incomes above the median have a 1 in 130 chance.' Discussion The City's west side and central corridor continue to have economic disparities that can be addressed through investments of CDBG funding. Expanding and building upon the target areas of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan,will allow the City to continue to focus resources in a meaningful way.The City has increased its investment in the target area from 12% in the first year,to 20% in the second year. The City will look to grow investment in the target area in future years, ultimately ended up closer to 35%on an annual basis.While not limited to the target area, housing rehabilitation efforts will be heavily marketed in the target area. For the 2021-2022 Action Plan,this includes efforts of partners such as ASSIST, NeighborWorks Salt Lake, and Salt Lake City's Housing& Neighborhood Development(HAND). Each organization provides housing rehabilitation services targeted to low-to-moderate income households. Marketing these programs will help ensure that aging housing stock does not fall into disrepair or become blighted.Throughout this Plan period and beyond,the City will leverage and strategically target funding for neighborhood improvements,transportation improvements, and economic development to maximize impact within targeted neighborhoods. ' James Wood,Dejan Eskic and D.J.Benway,Gardner Business Review, What Rapidly Rising Prices Mean for Housing Affordability,May 2018. 52I11 a , e SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-55 AFFORDABLE HOUSING Introduction The Salt Lake City's Housing and Neighborhood Development Division (HAND) is committed to lessening the current housing crisis that is affecting Salt Lake City, as in all U.S. cities,through a range of robust policy and project initiatives to improve housing affordability for all residents,with an emphasis on households earning 4O%AM| or below. During the 2O21'2022 program year, Salt Lake City will support housing activities through all four of its federal grant programs: [DD6. ESG' H0K4E. and HOPVVA, but for the sake of clarify,the numbers listed below are being derived specifically from the CDBG and HOME program goals. Second Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless: 74 Non-Homeless: 707 Special Needs: 123 TOTAL: 904 Second Year Goals for the Number mfHouseholds Supported Through Rental Assistance: 87 The Production mf New Units: 7 Rehab mf Existing Units: 635 Acquisition of Existing Units: 13 TOTAL 742 Discussion To guide Salt Lake City's affordable housing goals, in December 2017,the City approved Growing SLC,A Five-Year Housing Plan, 20/8'2022' o data-driven strategy for ensuring long-term affordability and preservation,while balancing the unique need of the City's neighborhoods. Salt Lake City will support affordable housing activities in the coming year by utilizing the following federal community development funding programs: CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA.Affordable housing activities will provide subsidies for individuals and families ranging from 0Y6to 8096AML Activities will include: ° Tenant-based rental assistance; ° Short-term rental/utility assistance; xs�r o g c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ° Rapid re-housing; ° Homeowner housing rehabilitation; and ° Direct down payment assistance for eligible homebuyers. An analysis of Salt Lake City's homebuyer market demonstrates a reasonable range of low-income households will continue to qualify for mortgage financing assistance: ° US Census data, Salt Lake City, Z0O0-2O18: o The median home values increased Og.D96'from $1S2'400to $2Oy'200 o The median household income increased bvS2.646.from $36'944in2O00to $S6'37Oin 2018 ° HUD, HOME Income Guidelines for 202O'Salt Lake County,O0Y6AM| for a family of4: $73'75O ° A[S data,Salt Lake City, 201S'2019: o The number of households earning$SO'00O $74,9g9' under the poverty line: 16.6%nf total population o The average monthly owner costs with a mortgage, $1'601 ° UtahRealEstate.com,from July 2020 to March 2021, number of Salt Lake City homes sold between $100'000'$299'999: 271. AP-60 PUBLIC HOUSING Introduction The Housing Authority of Salt Lake City(HASLC) is responsible for managing the public housing inventory, developing new affordable housing units and administering the Housing Choice voucher programs for the City.The Authority strives to provide affordable housing opportunities throughout the community by developing new or rehabilitating existing housing that is safe, decent,and affordable -a place where a person's income level or background cannot be identified by the neighborhood in which they live. In addition to the development and rehabilitation of units,the HASLC also manages several properties emphasizing safe, decent, and affordable housing that provides an enjoyable living environment that is free from discrimination, efficient to operate,and remains an asset to the community.The HASL[ maintains a strong financial portfolio to ensure flexibility, sustainabi|ity, and continued access to affordable tax credits,foundations,and grant resources. x4�r o g c SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN As an administrator of the City's Housing Choice voucher programs,the Housing Choice Voucher Program provides rental assistance to low-income families(50%of area median income and below).This program provides rental subsidies to over 2,900 low-income families,disabled,elderly, and chronically homeless clients. Other programs under the Housing Choice umbrella include: Housing Choice Moderate Rehabilitation; Housing Choice New Construction; Project Based Vouchers; Multifamily Project Based Vouchers;Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Vouchers; Housing Opportunities for Persons with HIV/AIDS; and Shelter plus Care Vouchers. Under these other Housing Choice programs,the HASLC provided rental subsidies to additional qualified program participants. Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing HASLC continues to build a strong portfolio of new properties and aggressively apply for additional vouchers.As part of a strategic planning process held with Commissioners,staff, and residential leaders, HASLC has also identified several goals for 2021-2022.Among these goals are increased focus on assisting local leaders and agencies respond to homelessness in the City as well as developing and attaining more capacity for additional living units through real estate activities, rehabilitation, pursuing new Shared Housing(previously referred to as Single Room Occupancy) projects, developing increased relationships and services targeting and attracting landlords, and sophisticated management of HUD programs. HASLC also utilizes HUD Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD)to preserve and improve their many properties. In 2021, HASLC is close to the completion on Capitol Homes which will provide 62 housing units for individuals and families under 55%AMI with set-asides for previously homeless,victims of domestic violence,and veterans. HASLC continues to look for ways to expand their portfolio by identifying challenging properties and continuing to develop catalytic and transformative projects and programming. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership Both HASLC and Housing Connect, previously Salt Lake County Housing Authority, have active monthly tenant meetings and encourage participation in management decisions related to the specific housing communities. Housing Connect has a Resident Advisory Board that has representatives from public housing, Section 8,and special needs programs.A member of the Resident Advisory Board is appointed to the Housing Connect's Board of Commissioners. HASLC operates Family Self-Sufficiency programs that address areas of improving personal finances and homeownership preparation for voucher recipients. 55lP ag e SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN If the PHA isdesignated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided mrother assistance Housing Connect and HA5L[are both designated os high performers. AP-65 HOMELESS & OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS ACTIVITIES Introduction Salt Lake City works with a large homeless services community to reduce the number of persons experiencing homelessness, reduce the length of time individuals experience homelessness, increase successful transitions out ofhomelessness,and reduce the number of instances that clients may return to homelessness. Salt Lake City representatives participate in the local Salt Lake County Continuum of Care's (CoQ executive board and its prioritization committee specifically, so the Continuum of Care's priorities are considered during Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG)allocations.The three local ESG funders also meet regularly to coordinate ESG and CoC activities to ensure an accurate level of funding is provided to match the community's service needs and goals.Additionally,the City participates in Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness and the State Homeless Coordinating Council to further coordinate efforts. The Salt Lake County CoC contracts with the State of Utah to administer the Utah Homeless Management Information System (H[W|S).A|| service agencies in the region and the rest nf the state are under uniform data standard for HUD reporting and local ESG funders.All ESG funded organizations participate in HK4|S. Representatives from Salt Lake City sits onthe HyW|S Steering Committee. HM|Sda1a allows Salt Lake City and its partners to track the effectiveness of programs and gauge the continuing service needs of the community. The State ofUtah, in coordination with local service providers and volunteers, conduct an annual Point-In- Time count at the end ofianuary to count sheltered (emergency shelter and transitional housing)and unsheltered homeless individuals. Unsheltered homeless individuals are counted by canvassing volunteers.The volunteers use the VI-SPDAT assessment tool to interview and try to connect unsheltered homeless individuals into services. m�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Describe the jurisdictions secomd'yeargoa|s and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including reaching out tm homeless persons(especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs Salt Lake [ity's primary homeless services goal is to help homeless individuals and families get off the street and into permanent housing. In the short term, Salt Lake City will continue to provide collaborative services to the homeless population. Salt Lake City recognizes that not every homeless individual is alike and because of that,there is no one size fits all solution.There is a wide variety ofhomeless subpopu|otimns in the greater community. Each of these groups have different needs that Salt Lake City focuses on to provide the best services possible. There are groups of chronic homeless individuals,veterans,families,women with children,youth, and homeless-by-choice in the greater community. Each of these groups have different needs and each stage of homelessness must also be considered.The four stages of homelessness are prevention (keeping people from dropping into homelessness with jobs and affordable housing), homelessness(helping with dai|yneeds- |ockers' shovvers' Mzj'1/anxcendinghonoe|essness(Mndinghouxing' emp|oyment)' and preventing recurrence(offering supportive services to housing). If the four stages are not considered for each group, efforts will eventually be unsuccessful. Personalized one-on-one outreach to homeless individuals providing information about the specific services that individual needs(e.g., housing, mental health treatment, a hot meal) is the most effective outreach approach. Salt Lake City is exploring how to introduce lived experience peer support assistance as outreach teams work with unsheltered homeless individuals. Salt Lake City works regularly with various community partners that provide outreach and assessment of individuals experiencing homelessness including Catholic Community Services,Volunteers of America, the Department of Veterans Affairs,The Road Home, and others. |n2016. Salt Lake City opened the Community Connection Center ([C[) |ocated in the primary homeless services area of the City.The[[C operates asa drop-in center and employs social workers that assess individuals'needs and help connect people with available housing and supportive services.The[[{ has been successful in filling the need for additional homeless outreach and case management services in the City. For the City's 2020 Community Engagement Survey, HAND staff distributed paper surveys to the three HR[s and the Homeless Youth Resource Center to collect responses from individuals experiencing x7�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN homelessness.A total of 138 responses were collected and taken into consideration in the development of this 2021-2O22 Annual Action Plan. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs mfhomeless persons Starting with the State of Utah's Ten-Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness, most efforts to deal with homelessness in Utah rely on the Housing First model.Although the ten-year plan has sunset,the programs and direction are still being implemented throughout the State.The premise of Housing First is that once homeless individuals have housing, they are more likely to seek and continue receiving services and can search for employment.The Housing First model has been effective in Salt Lake City, though meeting the varied housing needs of this population can be challenging.The homeless housing market needs more permanent supportive housing, housing vouchers,affordable non-supportive housing, and housing located near transit and services. Salt Lake City is working towards new solutions in these areas as outlined in the Cit/s adopted five-year housing plan, Growing Il[ There is a continued need for day services to meet the basic needs of persons experiencing homelessness. Needed daytime services include bathrooms, laundry, safe storage for their life's belongings, mail receipt,and an indoor area to"hang out^ Salt Lake City addresses these issues bv supporting shelters, day services, and providing a free storage program.These things were all considered in the recent creation of the homeless resource centers.These centers also provide food services and look to be all inclusive, one stop shop for services and connection to community resources.This shift in how homeless services are provided will help the community realize our goal that homelessness is rare, brief, and non-recurring. Salt Lake City will continue aiming to assist homeless persons make the transition to permanent housing, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness,facilitating access for homeless individuals and families Lm affordable housing units' and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again. The City plays an important role bv providing strategic funding for the valuable efforts undertaken by other stakeholders and, at times,filling in gaps in essential services.The City can also lend its voice and political weight to lobby for changes in policy, regulation,and statutes as needed to facilitate a comprehensive and effective approach Lo addressing homelessness and related issues. m�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Salt Lake City's adopted housing plan, Growing SLC, includes efforts to provide affordable housing options along with the spectrum of housing including permanent supportive housing,transition in place,tenant based rental assistance, and affordable non-supportive housing. The Salt Lake County Collective Impact to End Homelessness Steering Committee,and the Salt Lake County Continuum of Care voted in support of merging these two entities into a new homeless system structure called the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness.This Coalition's primary goals are to prevent and end homelessness in the Salt Lake Valley through a system-wide commitment of resources, services' data co||ectinn, analysis and coordination among all stakeholders. Salt Lake City staff play a key role in assisting this effort asit moves forward. In response to the COVID-1 9 pandemic, in 2020 and 2021 the community homeless planning organizations and the homeless service providers,adeptly pivoted and evolved to the precautions and recommendation from national and local health officials to mitigate[0V|D-1Q transmission. Coordinated efforts included: physical barriers, mask enforcement, limited gatherings, enhancing cleaning of facilitates, remote staffing,virtual case management, and new non-congregant shelter options in the form of an unused senior retirement center and two hotels. Greatly assisting these efforts was the availability and usage of HUD waivers and CARES Act ESG-CV CDBG-CV. and HOPVVA-[Vfunding. Helping homeless persons(especially chronically homeless individuals and families,families with children,veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period wf time that individuals and families experience homelessness,facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again Salt Lake City and its service partners work with homeless individuals to help them successfully transition from living on the streets or shelters and into permanent housing or independent living. Salt Lake City has been working with service partners and other governmental agencies through the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness(SLVCEH).This includes work on various subgroups that focus on specific areas ofservice, including housing and coordinated entry. Salt Lake City has the goal to help streamline service delivery to the homeless community with the express purpose nf shortening the period that individuals and families experience homelessness. xv�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Salt Lake City has also funded the creation of new permanent supportive housing units and programs which serve the most vulnerable members of our community. Progress is being made on both goals. Salt Lake City and its partner,the Road Home, are continuing to operate the House 20 program.The House 20 program engages with some of the most vulnerable members of our community,the majority of whom are now in stable housing.Through the City's Funding Our Future efforts,the City has funded a variety of housing programs that aim tofill in gaps in services in our community.These programs include a new shared housing pilot program and housing programs which target families with children, individuals with substance abuse disorders, refugees, and victims of domestic violence. Salt Lake City has provided funding to support the creation of a combined 280 new units of permanent supportive housing that are at various stages of development in the City,which includes the Magnolia, a new construction project of 65 units for homeless individuals scheduled for completion in in 2021. These permanent supportive housing units have been identified by the Salt Lake Continuum of Care as a need in the larger homeless services community. Salt Lake City continues to make progress on our 5-year housing plan, Growing SLC,which seeks to improve the housing market in the City by focusing on three primary goals: ° Reforming City practices to promote a responsive, affordable high-opportunity housing market; ° Increasing housing opportunities for cost-burdened households; and ° Building more equitable city. Through implementation of GrowingSLC and the funding of housing programs through Funding our Future and federal dollars,Salt Lake City is working to increase access to affordable housing units for individuals and families experiencing homelessness.These efforts will help shorten the period of time individuals and families experience homeless and prevent recently homeless individuals and families from failing back into homelessness. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems wf care(such as health care facilities, mental health facilities,foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and imstikmtimms); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs oo�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Salt Lake City, along with other organizations in the Salt Lake County Continuum of Care,work to prevent and divert individuals and families from experiencing homelessness. Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County and the State of Utah all provide funding to Utah Community Action for short-term rental assistance to families at risk wf falling into homelessness. Salt Lake City supports the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness, 2020 Strategic Plan's goal of innp|ementingre|ease/discharge best practices and policies, and providing resources to individuals being discharged from incarceration who are at risk uf becoming homeless.Additionally, Salt Lake City has identified strategies in our 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan goal, Build Community Resiliency,to assist individuals exiting treatment centers/programs and/or institutions. Discussion Salt Lake City is reducing and ending homelessness in the community through strong collaborations with partner organizations throughout the Salt Lake County Continuum ofCare. Salt Lake City works closely with Salt Lake County,the State of Utah and service providers to stop families from dropping into homelessness, reduce the length of time individuals and families experience homelessness, help individuals and families successfully transition out of homelessness, and keep individuals and families from rescinding back into homelessness. AP-70 HOPWA GOALS Second year goals for the number mf households tmbe provided housing through the use mf HOPWA for Short-term Rent, Mortgage, and Utility Assistance Payments: 25 Tenant-Based Rental Assistance: 51 Units Provided in Permanent Housing Facilities Developed, Leased,or 0 Operated with HOPWA Funds: Units provided in Transitional Short-Term Housing Facilities Developed, 0 Leased,or Operated with HOPWA Funds: TOTAL: 76 AP-75 ACTION PLAN BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING 61 �rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Um1mmductimm As discussed in sections MA-40 and SP-55 of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, several barriers to the development and preservation of affordable housing exist within Salt Lake City, including the following: ° Land costs ° Construction costs ° Housing and transportation costs ° Development and rehabilitation financing ° Housing rehabilitation complexities ° Foreclosures and loan modifications ° Neighborhood market conditions ° Economic conditions ° Land use regulations ° Development fees and assessments ° Permitp/ucessingprocedu/es ° Environmental review procedures ° Lack of zoning and development incentives ° Complicated impact fee waiver process ° Competition for limited development incentives ° Landlord tenant policies ° N|M8Yism While not all of these barriers can be addressed with federal funding, during the 2021-2022 program year, the City will work to reduce barriers to affordable housing through the following planning efforts and initiatives: ° Growing J1(�A Five-Year Plan, J0/8-2022:The City has formally adopted a housing plan that ix addressing the barriers listed above and has served as o catalyst on a local and regional level to focus on the housing crisis.The plan provides an assessment of citywide housing needs'with emphasis on the availability and affordability of housing, housing needs for changing demographics, and neighborhood-specific needs. Growing Sl[idendfies several goals to remove barriers to affordable housing.Those goals include reforming City practices to promote a responsive, affordable, high-opportunity housing market; increase housing opportunities for cost-burdened households; and building more equitable City. uz�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ° Homeless Strategies: Salt Lake City works collaboratively with service providers, local municipalities,the State of Utah,the Continuum of Care, and other stakeholders through the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness(Coalition)to ensure a regional and concerted effort to address homeless issues within the City.The structure of the Coalition provides a succinct network for data collection, resource deployment, and service implementation.The City will continue to play critical and visionary role in the Coalition in the coming year. ° Home Ownership Options:The City has launched a new program for homeownership,Welcome Home SLC.The program provides Iow-to moderate-income families the opportunity to purchase a home in Salt Lake City. It will help stabilize communities, provide incentive for neighborhood investments,and allow families Lo build wealth. ° Community Land Trust([LU: Salt Lake City has launched a Community Land Trust that will allow donated and trusted land to maintain perpetual affordability while ensuring the structure on the land,the home, is purchased, owned, and sold over time to income-qualifying households,just as any other home would be. By holding the land itself in the trust,the land effectively receives a write down each time the home is sold, insulating the property for growing land costs but still allowing equity to be built by the homeowner. There have been eleven properties added to the [LT since ZO1O. ° Funding Our Future:Will provide additional funding during 2021-2022 to increase housing opportunities in Salt Lake City through a 5% sales tax increase approved by Council in May 2018. ° Leverage Public Land:The City has been and will continue to look at City owned properties as an investment in affordable housing.Additionally, proceeds from development on public land could be used for future affordable housing development. ° Redevelopment Agency:The Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency has committed over$70 million since 2010 to address affordable housing efforts in the City,with a specific focus on areas with high land values. ° Housing Trust Fund:The Housing Trust Fund was created in 2000 to provide financial assistance to support the development and preservation of affordable and special needs housing in Salt Lake City. Eligible activities include acquisition, new construction, and rehabilitation of both multifamily rental properties and single-family homeownership.Additional assistance relating to hmusinQfore|igib|ehmuseho|dsa|somayinc|udeprVjectortenant-basedrenta| ossistonce' duvvn payment assistance and technical assistance. ° Policy:The City is continually evaluating policies that may impede the development of affordable housing.A few policy changes the City is considering over the coming year include an Affordable os�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Housing Overlay zoning ordinance, Housing Loss Mitigation ordinance amendment,and a Single Room Occupancy(SRO)/Sha/ed Housing ordinance. Actions planned 1m remove mr ameliorate the negative effects mfpublic policies that serve as barriers tw affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes,fees and charges,growth limitations, and policies affecting the return mm residential investment Salt Lake City will work to remove or ameliorate public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing through the following efforts: ° Affordable Housing Development Incentives: Zoning and fee waiver incentives will be implemented and/or strengthened, including the following: o Review the City's Housing Loss Mitigation ordinance to ensure that the city's stock of inexpensive housing isn't rapidly being replaced bv more expensive units. n Develop an Affordable Housing Overlay zone that allows for and provides incentives for the creation and preservation of affordable housing. o Evaluate the desire for a Single Room Occupancy(SRO)/Shared Housing ordinance that allows for SRO'sin single-family neighborhoods throughout the City. n Off-Street Parking Ordinance update to improve pedestrian-scale development and amenities. o Low-Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning amendments to remove local zoning barriers tn housing density and types ofhousing. ° Leverage Public Resources for Affordable Housing Development: Public resources, including city- owned land,will be leveraged with private resources for affordable housing development. ° Funding Targeting:The Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development is evaluating ways to coordinate and target affordable housing subsidies more effectively,to include the coordination of local funding sources(Olene Walker Housing Loan Fund, Salt Lake City Housing Trust Fund, Salt Lake County funding, e1cl ° Implement Fair Housing Action Items: Salt Lake City will work to remove and/or ameliorate housing impediments for protected classes through action items as identified in the City's Fair Housing Action Plan as outlined in the 202O'2024 Consolidated Plan. 64�r o g c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ° Utilize Federal Funding to Expand Affordable Housing Opportunities: Utilize CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funding to expand housing opportunity through homeowner rehabilitation, emergency home repair, acquisition/rehabilitation, direct financial assistance, tenant-based rental assistance, project-based rental assistance, and rapid re-housing. AP-85 OTHER ACTIONS Introduction This section outlines Salt Lake [ity's efforts to carry out the following: ° Address obstacles tn meeting underservedneeds ° Foster and maintain affordable housing ° Reduce lead-based paint hazards ° Reduce the number of poverty-level families ° Develop institutional structure ° Enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies ° Radon Mitigation Policy Actions planned tm address obstacles tm meeting underservedneeds The most substantial impediment in meeting underserved needs is a lack of funding and resources. Strategic shifts identified through Salt Lake City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan provide a framework for maximizing and leveraging the City's block grant allocations better focus funding to address underserved needs. Underserved needs and strategic actions are asfollows: Underserved Need:Affordable housing ° Actions: Salt Lake City is utilizing federal and local resources to expand both rental and homeownership opportunities. In addition,the City is utilizing public land to leverage private capital for the development of affordable housing.These efforts will work to address the affordable housing gap in Salt Lake City. Underserved Need: Homelessness ° Actions: Salt Lake City is working with housing and homeless service providers to coordinate and streamline processes for service delivery. By utilizing the V|-SPDAT pre-screen survey, providers m�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN can access and prioritize services based on chronicity and medical vulnerability.These efforts will assist in addressing unmet needs by utilizing resources more effectively. UnderservedNeed: Special needs individuals. ° Actions: Salt Lake City is working to address underserved needs for refugees, immigrants,the elderly,victims of domestic violence, persons living with H|V/A|DS'and persons with a disability by providing resources for basic needs,as well as resources to expand self-sufficiency. For example,federal funding is utilized to provide early childhood education for refugees and other at-risk children; improve immediate and long-term outcomes for persons living with HlV/AlDS; and provide job training vulnerable populations; and provide medical services for at risk populations. Actions planned tm foster and maintain affordable housing The City is committed to foster and maintain affordable housing throughout our City.This is evident through identifying specific gaps that exist in the community, and then designing affordable housing efforts specifically to address these needs.The City aims to target households earning 80%AMI and below,with emphasis on households earning 40%AMI and below. Through the housing initiatives and efforts identified in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan,Salt Lake City aims to: ° Address the Gty's affordable housing shortage for those most inneed. ° Address housing needs for Salt Lake [ity's changing demographics. ° Address neighborhood specific needs, including the following: o Protect affordability in neighborhoods where affordability is disappearing. o Promote affordability in neighborhoods with a lack of affordable housing. ° Preserve the [it/s existing affordable housing stock. ° Strengthen the City's relationship with our housing partners,financial institutions, and foundations. ° Support those who develop and advocate for affordable housing. Toward this end, Salt Lake City will foster and maintain affordable housing during the 2021-2022 program year through the following actions: ° Utilize [DBGfunding to support owner-occupied rehabilitation for households at80f6AM| and below. ° Utilize CDBG and HOME funding for acquisition and rehabilitation of dilapidated and blighted housing. 6a�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ° Utilize ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funding to create housing opportunities for individuals and households at 30%AMI and below through Tenant-Based Rental Assistance and Rapid Re- Housing. ° Utilize CDBG and HOME funding for direct financial assistance to homebuyers at 80%AMI and below. ° Promotethedeve|opnoen1ofaffo/dab|ehousinbwhh |owinconoehouxingtaxcredits, Salt Lake City Housing Trust Fund, Olene Walker Housing Loan Fund, Salt Lake City's HOME Development Fund and other funding sources. ° Leverage public resources, including publicly owned land,with private capital for the development of affordable housing. ° Work to ameliorate and/or eliminate housing impediments for protected classes asoutlined in the 202O-ZO24 Consolidated P|an's Fair Housing Action Plan. ° Work to leverage other city resources such as Redevelopment Agency funding/strategies, maximize sales tax housing funding, and other sources as they are identified with federal funding where applicable. ° Salt Lake City launched a Community Land Trust that currently has ten properties,with plans to increase the number of properties in the coming years. Actions planned tm reduce lead-based paint hazards Because of the high percentage of the housing units in Salt Lake City that were built before 1978, outreach and education efforts must continue.As such,the City has implemented a plan to address lead issues in our residential rehabilitation projects.The City's Housing Rehabilitation Program is in- compliance with HUD's rules concerning identification and treatment of lead hazards. During the 2021 2022 program year,Salt Lake City will work in conjunction with our partners on the state and county levels to educate the public on the dangers posed by lead based paint,to include the following: ° Undertake outreach efforts through direct mailings,the Salt Lake City website,various fairs and public events, and the local community councils. ° Provide materials in Spanish to increase lead-based paint hazard awareness in minority communities. ° Partner with Salt Lake County's Lead Safe Salt Lake program to treat lead hazards in the homes of children identified as having elevated blood levels. ° Emphasize lead hazards in our initial contacts with homeowners needing rehabilitation. o7�r o g c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ° Work with community partners to encourage local contractors to obtain worker certifications for their employees and sub-cun1/actors. Actions planned toreduce the number uf poverty-level families In a strategic effort to reduce the number of households living in poverty and prevent households at risk of moving towards poverty from doing so, Salt Lake City is focusing on a two-pronged approach: 1. Creating neighborhoods of opportunity to build capacity and expand resources within concentrated areas of poverty. 2. Support the city's most vulnerable populations, including the chronically homeless, homeless families,food-insecure individuals,the disabled, persons living with HIV/AIDS,victims of domestic violence and the low-income elderly. The City's anti-poverty strategy aims to close the gap in a number of socioeconomic indicators, such as improving housing affordability, school-readiness of young children, employment skills of at-risk adults, accesstwtransporiadonfwr |ovv'inconnehouseho|ds' andaccesstoh-eshfwodsforfood'insecurefanni|ies. Efforts will focus on the following objectives: ° Assist low-income individuals to maximize their incomes. ° Reduce the linkages between poor health and poverty. ° Expand housing opportunities. ° Reduce the impacts of poverty onchildren. ° Ensure that vulnerable populations have access to supportive services. Federal entitlement funds allocated through this 2021-2022 Action Plan will support the City's anti-poverty strategy through the following efforts: ° Provide]ob training for vulnerable populations. ° Provide early childhood education to limit the effects of intergenerational poverty. ° Provide essential supportive services for vulnerable populations. ° Provide housing rehabilitation for low-income homeowners. ° Expanded affordable housing opportunities. ° Improved neigh borhood/co m mercia I infrastructure in West Side Target Area. ° Enhance support for small businesses and micro-enterprise businesses. ° Reduce food insecurities for low-income households. oo�r o g c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Actions planned tm develop institutional structure As outlined in the 2020'2024 Consolidated Plan, Salt Lake City ix building upon the 2015'2019 Consolidated Plan and continuing to take a coordinated and strategic shift in allocating federal entitlement funds to place a stronger emphasis on community needs,goals, objectives and outcomes. This includes the following efforts to strengthen and develop institutional structure: ° Geographically target infrastructure and economic development funding to areas of the city with higher poverty rates, lower incomes, and/or reduced access tVtransportation. ° Increase coordination between housing and supportive service providers to reduce/eliminate duplicative efforts, encourage partnerships, increase transparency, and standardize processes. ° Strengthen support for the City's most vulnerable populations, including the chronically hume|ess, homeless families, individuals with disabilities, persons living with H|V/A|DS.victims of domestic violence and the low-income elderly. ° Support housing efforts that connect residents with supportive services and programs that improve self-sufficiency. ° Offer technical assistance toagencies implementing projects with [DBG' ESG' HOME, and/or HOPVVA funding tn ensure compliance and support of program objectives. ° Support employee training and certifications to expand the internal knowledge base on HUD programs, as well as housing and community development best practices. Actions planned tm enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies Salt Lake City recognizes the importance of coordination between supportive service and housing providers in meeting priority needs. Stakeholders have been working towards developing and implementing a streamlined and effective delivery system to include the following efforts: ° Created and implemented a no wrong door approach to accessing housing and other services. ° Increased coordination through the Salt Lake County's Continuum of Care, Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness, the Utah Homeless Management Information System, and State Homeless Coordinating Council. ° Coordinated assessments to help individuals and families experiencing homeless move through the system faster. ° Coordinated diversion and homeless prevention resources to reduce new entries into homelessness. ov�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ° Coordinated efforts to house the highest users of the homeless services and provide trauma informed case management. ° Improved weekly"housing triage" meetings that provide a format for developing a housing plan for homeless individuals and families with the most urgent housing needs. Discussion Actions planned to mitigate impacts of Radon Salt Lake City iscommitted to providing safe, affordable housing opportunities that are free of contaminations that could affect the health and safety of occupants. Section 50.3(i)states that"it is HUD policy that all property proposed for use in HUD programs be free of hazardous materials, contamination, toxic chemicals and gasses, and radioactive substances,where a hazard could affect the health and safety ofoccupantsofconMictvviththeintendedud|izadnnnftheprwperty.^Twthatend.theOtycreateda Radon Mitigation Policy that address the potential of Radon in homes that are newly constructed or rehabilitated utilizing federal funding issued through this Annual Action Plan.The City has, and will continue,to provide technical assistance to each agency in an effort to ensure agencies are properly identifying sites that must be tested, how Uo test correctly, how to read test results, and the appropriate mitigation standards that must befollowed. The Radon Mitigation Policy includes specifics on testing and mitigation requirements.The City has also partnered with the State of Utah to implement the mitigation policy, provide technical assistance' and outreach/education materials.To leverage resources,the City will refer clients needing financial assistance for mitigation to other community resources.To ensure that even the most vulnerable and high-risk populations have an opportunity to mitigate Radon,the City has implemented a grant program whereby residents meeting a set of criteria, may apply for a grant to bear the costs of mitigation. AP-90 PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 91.220(1)(1.2/) 7o�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Um1mmductimm Salt Lake [ity's program specific requirements for[DBG' HOME, and ESG are outlined as follows. Community Development Block Grant Program (C0BG) Referemca24 CFR91.22O(|)(1) 1. Projects planned with all [DBGfunds expected tobe available during the year are identified in the Projects Table.The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects tobe carried out 1 The total amount ofanticipated program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not $1'500'000 yet been reprogrammed. 2 The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific0 objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 3 The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements. 8 4 The amount of any grant funds returned tu the line uf credit for which the planned use has not been included in o prior statement or 0 plan. 5 The amount of income from float-funded activities. 0 Total Program Income: $1'S00.000 2' Other CDBQRequirements 1 The amount of urgent need activities O 2 The estimated percentage of[DBG funds that will be used for activities 9096 that benefit persons of low-and moderate-income Overall Benefit Aconsecudve period of one,two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70%of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low-and noodcrate'inconne.This Annual Action Plan covers a one-year period. HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOK8E) 71 �r o g c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Reference 24CFR91.220(U)(2) 1. A description of other forms of investment being used beyond those identified in Section 92.205 isasfollows Salt Lake City does not utilize HOME funding beyond those identified in Section 92.205. Z. A description of the guidelines that will be used for resale or recapture of HOME funds when used for homnebuyer activities as required in92.2S4. isasfollows In order to preserve the number of affordable housing units for continued benefit to low-income residents, Salt Lake City requires that HOME funds used to assist homeownership be recaptured whenever assisted units become vacant prior to the end of the affordability period that is commensurate with the amount of funding invested in the activity.Trust deeds or property restrictions are filed on appropriate properties to ensure compliance with the period of affordability. Homeownership Recapture: Salt Lake City follows the HOME recapture provisions established at§92253(a)(5)(ii).Any remaining HOME assistance to the homebuyer must be recovered if the housing does not continue to be the principal residence of the family for the duration of the period of affordability.The HOME investment that is subject to recapture is based on the direct subsidy amount which includes the HOME assistance that enabled the home buyer to buy the housing unit. In all cases,the recapture provisions are limited to the net proceeds of the sale. Salt Lake City requires all sub-recipients and Community Housing Development Organizations([H0D)to follow the same recapture guidelines as outlined and required in the HOME rule. This provision is intended to ensure a fair return on investment for the homeowner if a sale occurs during the period of affordability.The City will utilize one of the following options: AJ If it was determined that HOME regulations were not adhered to for initial approval of the homeowner or during the term of affordability,the entire HOME subsidy will be recaptured. @) In the event of change of title/ownership,the City will reduce the HOME investment amount to be recaptured on a pro-rata basis for the time the homeowner has owned and occupied the housing measured against the applicable affordability period. C) If the net proceeds are not sufficient to recapture the appropriate HOME investment plus enable the homeowner to recover the amount of the homeowner's down payment and any capital improvement investment made by the owner since purchase,the City will share the net proceeds. Net proceeds are the sales price minus loan repayment(other zz�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN than HOME funds)and closing costs.The net proceeds will be divided proportionally on a pro-nata basis for the time the homeowner has owned and occupied the housing measured against the applicable affordability period. Owner investment returned first. The City may choose to permit the homebuyer to recover the homebuyer's entire investment(down payment and capital improvements made by the owner since purchase) before recapturing the HOME investment. HOME Funds Provided for Nmmnebuyer Activity Minimum years subject«e Recapture of HOME Funds of Affordability Under$15.00O 5Years Between $15'000 and$40'000 10Years Dve/$40'O00 15Years Homeownership Resale: Resale requirements will only apply to HOME-funded affordable homeownership opportunities provided using the Community Land Trust model. In that model, Salt Lake City provides funding to a Community Land Trust to sell homes at an affordable price while placing a 00'ycar leasehold on the estate. Resale provisions will be enforced by a recorded covenant signed by the landowner,the homebuyer, and the City, and through a 99-year ground lease between the landowner(the trust)and the homebuyer. Under both the covenant and the ground lease,the home may be sold only to an income-qualified buyer who will occupy the home as a primary residence.The landowner,through the ground lease, shall have an option to purchase to ensure that the home is sold to an eligible buyer at an affordable price. This provision is intended to ensure a fair return on investment for the homeowner if a sale occurs during the period of affordability.The Resale Requirement will limit the sales price, as described below. Due to the growing costs of homes in the Salt Lake City residential market'the City has opted to implement Homeownership Value Limit of$440'O00 for a single-family home. Salt Lake City determined 95 percent of the median area purchase price for single family housing in the jurisdiction in accordance with procedures established at§ 92.Z54(a)(2)(iii). Specifically,this purchase price was calculated based on a median sales price of$454.000(i.e. $464'0UU« 0.95 = $$44U.O0U)for single family homes.This figure is for both new construction and existing homes. An analysis of Salt Lake City's homebuyer market demonstrates a reasonable range of low-income households will continue tu qualify for mortgage financing assistance: 7s�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ° US Census data, Salt Lake City, 20O0-201O: o The median home values increased 89.896'from $1S2'400to $28y'200 o The median household income increased bv52.6%'from $]6.y44in2UOOto $56'370 ° HUD, HOME Income Guidelines for 2021.Salt Lake County, 80%AK4| for a family of4: $73'75O ° US Census data, Salt Lake City, 2O14-2U18: o The number of households earning$50'0O0-$74,gy9: 13'991 households, 17.996oftotal population o The average monthly owner costs with a mortgage, $1.534 ° Utah Real Estate.com,from July 2020 through March 2021,the number of Salt Lake City listings between $100'O00-$44Q'0g9: 1'3y2 I A description of the guidelines for resale or recapture that ensures the affordability of units acquired with HOME funds?See 24CFR92.254(a)(4)are asfollows As stated above, Salt Lake City requires that HOME funds be recaptured whenever assisted units become vacant prior to the end of the affordability period that is commensurate with the amount of funding invested in the activity. In very rare cases, Salt Lake City will use HOME funds as an acquisition source for multifamily projects.With these rental activities, rental projects must meet the appropriate period of affordability or HOME funds provided to them will be recaptured by the City. Trust deeds or property restrictions are filed on appropriate properties to ensure compliance with the period of affordability. Rental Housing Recapture: All HOME-assisted units must meet the affordability requirements for not less than the applicable period specified below regardless of the term of any loan or mortgage,transfer of ownership, or repayment of loan funds. Rental Housing Activity Minimum years of Affordability Rehab o/acquisition of existing housing per unit 5Yeao amount of HOME funds under$15'0OO Between $15'00U and $40'000 10Yea/s Over$4O.00Oor rehab involving refinancing 15Yeao New construction or acquisition ofnewly 20Yea/s constructed housing 74�rogc SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 4. Plans for using HOME funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated with HOME funds along with a description of the refinancing guidelines required that will be used under 24CFR92.2U6(b).are asfollows Salt Lake City does not use HOME, or CDBG,funds to refinance debt secured by multifamily housing that isrehabilitated. Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG) Reference 24CFR91'220(l)(4) 1. Include written standards for providing ESG assistance(may include asattachment) The Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG) Policies include written standards for providing ESG assistance. Salt Lake City's updated ESG policies and procedures are attached to this Annual Action Plan. 2. If the Continuum of Care has established centralized or coordinated assessment system that meets HUD requirements, describe that centralized or coordinated assessment system The Salt Lake Continuum of Care has developed a collaborative,written coordinated assessment plan. Consensus exists for a coordinated assessment plan that covers the entire Continuum of Care with a multi-access entry point quick assessment method for any homeless individual or family in need of emergency shelter or service. Our 2 1 1 system,service providers,government agencies, and others publicize all existing access points' striving to do everything we can to ensure individuals and families in need have clear direction for accessing appropriate services.After entry into an emergency service, individuals are tracked as they progress toward housing and/or support interventions.All homeless families and those individuals prioritized for permanent supportive housing placements are guided toward this centralized process and placed into one of several housing programs depending on assessment. Standardized assessments include a quick assessment for emergency services and eligibility and enrollment materials for housing placements. Representatives of the City worked with the CoC, ESG funders, and service providers to improve the coordinated assessment system to meet requirements set forth in Notice CPD-1 7-01.The new coordinated assessment system was approved by the Salt Lake County Homeless Coordinating Committee(aka the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness) in January 2018. Salt Lake City is continuing to work with the Cm[' ESG fundurs' and service providers to operationa|izethese new requirements through the Coordinated Entry Task Group. 75�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 3. Identify the process for making sub-awards and describe how the ESG allocation available to private nonprofit organizations(including community and faith-based organizations)will be allocated Grantingsub'avvardsisanintensive. months'|ongprocess. |tbeginsvvithapp|icationsbeingmade available and education workshops held to explain different federal grant programs and eligible activities under each. Staff also reaches out to potential applicants through the Salt Lake Homeless Coordinating Council,the local Continuum of Care,the Utah Housing Coalition, and others. After the application period closes, a general needs hearing is conducted to help guide how ESG monies should be spent.Applications are discussed with a rident advisory board in a public forum.Applicants are invited to meet with the resident advisory board to answer final questions or provide additional information regarding their programs and their role in the larger homeless services system structure. The Community Development& Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board (CDUP Board) reviews the ESG applications and makes a recommendation to the Salt Lake City Mayor based on federal guidelines,the 5 Year Consolidated Plan, and the [ityt long-term homeless services strategies.The Mayor then makes a recommendation on funding to the City Council based on the [DOP board recommendation,federal guidelines,the 5 Year Consolidated Plan, and the City's long-term homeless services strategies. The City Council holds a public hearing for comment on the programs and proposed benefits of each.The City Council then makes a funding decision based on public comment, the Mayor's recommendation, federal guidelines,the 5 Year Consolidated Plan, and the [ity'slong-term homeless services strategies. 4. If the jurisdiction is unable to meet the homeless participation requirement in 24 CFR 576.405(a),the jurisdiction must specify its plan for reaching out to and consulting with homeless or formerly homeless individuals in considering policies and funding decisions regarding facilities and services funded under ESG Before the Salt Lake City Council makes the final funding decisions for ESG funds,there are multiple venues for public outreach including two public hearings. Efforts are made to include participation from homeless and formerly homeless individuals. Emergency Solutions Grant funds, along with other public and private monies,are used by Salt Lake City to implement our short-and long-term homeless service goals. 7a�ro , c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Individuals experiencing homelessness often help the city craft and implement short-term and long-term service plans. Below are a few examples of how the city has created the opportunity for homeless persons to participate: ° Homeless individuals participated in the creation of the long-term homeless services situation assessment. ° The City interviewed over 100 homeless individuals as part of its Homeless Services Site Evaluation Commission in2O15. ° Summer of 2016,the City held a workshop specifically with individuals experiencing homelessness to draft the criteria used to locate new homeless resource centers. ° February 2017, a workshop was held with homeless individuals to gain feedback on the design' location, and programming at new homeless resource centers. ° March 2018, Salt Lake City participated in a Homeless Youth Forum,which brought together a wide range of service providers together to discuss service delivery for homeless youth.There were approximately 20 homeless and formerly homeless youth who were dispersed amongst the discussion groups and they provided valuable feedback on various service delivery systems. ° Summer of 2018,the City coordinated with Salt Lake County to collect survey data on funding priorities from individuals experiencing homelessness on two separate occasions. ° Summer of 2020,the City collected Community Engagement Surveys at the three Homeless Resource Center and the Homeless Youth Resource Center. ° TheCitycondnuestoreachouttopersonswith''|ivedexperience^tohe|pshapethe services being prioritized and funded throughout the homeless services system. ESG subgrantees and other homeless service providers routinely consult with current and formerly homeless individuals to make programming and service delivery decisions. 5. Describe performance standards for evaluating ESG Salt Lake City scores programs receiving Emergency Solutions Grant funding using the performance metrics required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)and local priorities. To increase transparency, leverage resources, and maximize efficiencies, Salt Lake City does the following: ° All applications undergo a risk analysis prior to the awarding offunds. 77�r o g c SALT LAKE CIrY2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ° Standardized quarterly reporting is reviewed for compliance,timeliness, and accuracy. ° Monitoring and technical assistance risk analyses are performed on all subgrantees to determine which organization would benefit from monitoring or technical assistance visits. ° Collect information that supports the required performance measurement metrics and provides context on local initiatives. To ensure consistent performance metrics,the Salt Lake County Continuum of Care contracts with the State of Utah to administer Utah's Homeless Management Information System (HM|S).All service agencies in the region and the rest ofthe state are under uniform data standard for HUD reporting and local E56funders.All ES6 funded organizations participate in HK4|S. Salt Lake City reviews HK4|S data to ensure grantees are properly using funds as promised in their contracts and meeting larger City, Continuum of Care, and State goals. 7o�r o g c EXHIBIT "B" HOME-ARP Allocation Plan [Draft attached as Exhibit A to Transmittal.] 4 Item F2 ,,,..��''� •••••..,,, MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY r tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 TO: City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards Budget Analysts DATE: March 7,2023 MMUNNOW RE: American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA)Local Business Assistance Grant Awards MOTION i—FULL COUNCIL VOTE I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving American Rescue Plan Act local business assistance grant awards as shown in the Funding Log except for items 2,5,7, 17, 27,35,37,and 41. Council Member Vuldemoros mazy txow be recused. MOTION 2—COUNCIL MEMBER VALDEMOROS RECUSED I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving American Rescue Plan Act local business assistance grant awards as shown in the Funding Log for items 2,5,7, 17,35,37,and 41. Council Member Vulde ores mat now return. Council Member Petro muz now be recused. MOTION 3 —COUNCIL MEMBER PETRO RECUSED I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving American Rescue Plan Act local business assistance grant awards as shown in the Funding Log for item 27. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.FOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 i COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO: City Council Members Project Timeline: FROM: Ben Luedtke,Budget&Public Policy Analyst 1st Briefing: February 21,2023 2nd Briefing: March 7, 2023 DATE: March 7,2023 Potential Final Vote: March 7, 2023 RE: American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA)Local Business Assistance Grant Awards NEW INFORMATION At the February,21 briefing,the Council discussed the Committee's recommendation to award$755,718 for 31 applications as shown in the Attachment i Funding Log.The Council took a straw poll (Council Mernber Petro absent)to support the Committee's funding recommendations dependent upon receiving clarification for how Phase i applicants that scored 70 or higher would be prioritized in Phase 2, Council Members deliberated getting more funds out in Phase 1 vs allowing time for additional applications to be submitted in a proposed Phase 2, Some Council Members have received additional information since the briefing and would like to consider releasing all $2 million in Phase i.A proposed Phase could come to the for review in the summer depending on the Committee's meeting schedule and the Council agenda availability during the FY2024 annual budget deliberations. A summary of clarifications and considerations from the first briefing is listed below the four options provided by I the Administration.Note: the Council may elect to choose from these options,or discuss other options going forward. Four Options Provided by the Administration The Economic Development Department provided four options below(A through D)for the Council's consideration.The four options are listed below as a summary. See the next page for more details on each option that were provided by the Administration. Option A— $1,017,397 for 42 applications(S261,679 more than the Committee's original recommendation)and bonus points in Phase 2 for applicants that scored between 75—77.9 in Phase 1. Option B— S755,718 for 31 applications and bonus points in Phase 2 for applicants that scored 70 Or more in Phase I. Option C— $1,452,093 for 57 applications($696-375 more than the Committee's original recommendation); S547,907 remaining for passt,hrough nonprofit applications providing services to small and local businesses which the Committee is reviewing over the coming weeks.Note at the time of publishing this report the c-ruct dollar arnounts,for this option were being confirmed. Option D— $755,718 for 31 applications; note this is the Committee's original recommendation. Page I t OPTION A(Award 8261,679 more funding in Phase i and bonus points in Phase 2) $1,017,397 for 42 applications and bonus points in Phase 2 for applicants that scored between 75— 77.9 in Phase City Council can approve the Committee's recommended list Of 31 applicants to receive grant funding AND award an additional it applicants scoring between 78-79.5 as part of Phase One,Group One, funding distribution. Additionally,any applicants with an average score between 75,0 and 77.9 would receive bonus points on their Phase 2 application. • The number ol'bonus points awarded could be decided by Council or the administration. • Applicants with scores between 77.o and 77.9 would be notified of bonus points for a high Phase i score and would receive technical assistance from staff to entrance their Phase 2 applications further. • This would add 11 additional applicants to receive funding bringing the Phase(,)no group one request to $1,017,397. OPTION B(Committee's original recommendation and hones points in Phase 2) $7.35,718 for 31 applications and bonus points in PhaSC 2 for applicants that scored 70 or more in Phase i City Council can approve the Committee's recommended list Of 31 applicants to receive grant funding AND request staff to award bonus points to any applicant from Phase One,Group One, scoring an average score Of 70.0 or higher to receive bonus points on their Phase 2 application. • The number of bonus points awarded could be decided by Council or the administration. • Applicants in this category would be notified of bonus points for a high Phase 1 score and would receive technical assistance from staff to enhance their Phase 2 applications further. • This would not add any additional applicants past the initial 31 recommended,but would award bonus points to 5o,applicants, and potentially increase the amount of their award based on a higher average score in Phase 2. • The amount funded would remain S755,718.00.Note: the group receiving bonus points has a total ask of$1,452,093 (meaning not all applicants with a score in the 70's will receive funding). OPTION C(Award all funding to Phase 1 applicants? $1,452,093 for 57 applications; $547,907 remaining for pass-through nonprofit applications providing services to all and local businesses which the Committee is reviewing now City Council can decide to continue funding high-scoring applicants past the initial 31 recommended by the Committee until a total of$1,500,000 is exhausted. • This would exhaust all ARPA funds allocated towards the following ARPA expenditure categories: 1)Small Businesses, 2)'fravel,'fourism,&Hospitality,and 3)Artist-Artisan Businesses • There would not be a second phase for small businesses to apply, • This would add an additional 26 applicants with averaged scores Of 75% and above and require a funding request Of$1,452,093, OPTION 1)(Committee's original recommendation; no bonus points in Phase 2) $755,718 for 31 applications City Council can approve the Committee's recommended list Of 31 applicants to receive grant funding AND allow for Phase Two to proceed without any preference to applicants who have applied before. During Phase Two, to provide extra points to applicants who have already applied would make it unfair to new applicants.The bonus for businesses applying a second time is the more fact they can apply a second time and improve the quality of their application. Presumably,businesses applying for the first Lime in Phase Two will already be at a significant disadvantage to those who have had some experience. Clarifications and considerations during the first briefing included: - The Committee is currently reviewing 4o applications for pass-through nonprofit grants providing services to small local businesses.The Con-um Llee will forward funding recomrnendat ions to the Council in the coming Page 12 weeks.This would conclude Phase 1 of the program assuming funding remains depending on which option the Council prefers as listed below. - The Economic Development Department created a waiting list for businesses that did not apply during Phase 1.There are currently,iq businesses on the waitftj,(L list. - The ordinance governing the program identified geographic equity as a criterion for the prioritization process. The Committee interpreted this to mean there should be at least one applicant funded in each Council District, This is why two applications(#3o and #31) are recommended for funding despite scoring less than other applications which are not recommended for funding. - There were three applications unable to show a proven loss as required by federal ARPA guidelines.These applications do have listed scores but are disqualified. - The Committee's priority is to spread funds further to more applicants.A sliding scale approach also called a performance approach was used to advance this priority. Some Council Members expressed a preference for more information about,how local a business is and impacts to the City. For example,does the business only have a registered address in Salt Lake City but operates mostly in other jurisdictions? Is the business primarily serving clients in Salt Lake City? Some Council Members mentioned potentially adding more ARPA funding to the program for a future phase depending on how much of the City's ARPA fiscal recovery funding remains and bow much may be needed in the next annual budget. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE In April 2022 as part of Budget Amendment#4 of FY2022,the Council approved one-time $2 million from ARPA for local business assistance grant awards managed by the Economic Development Department.if the 31 grants are awarded as recommended,then$1,244,282 would remain for future phases of local business assistance grant awards.Note the Council also approved a separate one-time$2 million from ARPA for nonprofit assistance grant awards managed by the Community and Neighborhood Department(CAN).The Committee is currently reviewing nonprofit applications submitted through CAN's process.The Community Recovery Committee is recommending$755,718 of ARPA grant awards to 31 local businesses as shown in Attachment 1-Funding Log.The Mayor made no changes to the Committee's funding recommendations.The Administration reviewed all applications for eligibility and compliance with federal ARPA guidance.The Council has final decision-making authority over the grant awards including the dollar amounts and uses. Please see"Additional Information"section for more on applications,award limits, scoring,and clarifications about the recommended funding log. Goal of the briefing:Review the recommended grant awards,identify questions and potential modifications to the awards and/or process,and determine whether the Council is comfortable scheduling an adoption vote. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. Questions about Recommended Grant Awards—Does the Council have any questions about the 31 recommended local business assistance grant awards? 2. Award Based on Sliding Scale or Full Eligible Amount—The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration why the Committee recommends awarding based on a sliding scale and not the full eligible amount.The difference between the two approaches is$125,475• 3. Requiring Unsuccessful Phase 1 Applications to Reapply in Phase 2—The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration why applicants not recommended for funding in Phase 1 would not be considered in Phase 2 unless they reapply.Would the Council like remaining Phase 1 applications to be considered in Phase 2? 4. Minimum Grant Amount—The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration identifying a minimum funding award for individual grants like the$30,00o minimum for annual HUD grants and$50,000 for CIP. Page 13 Setting a minimum amount is intended to balance the burden of administering the grants with creation of public benefits.Nine of the grant recommendations are less than $io,000 and the smallest*17 is $2,583• ADDITIONIAL&BACKGROUND INFORMATION Applications: 296 applications were submitted for Phase 1 during the month of September 2022. 157 applications were received from eligible local businesses and 40 from nonprofits.Note at the time of publishing staff was clarifying with the City Attorney's Office whether nonprofits could also be considered local businesses in the context of this funding.The other 99 applications were ineligible for reasons such as the applicant was located outside of city limits,did not begin operations within the federal time requirements,the application was incomplete,or late. Award Limits:The maximum award is $1oo,000 for any of the ARPA assistance grants per City Code Chapter 2.20.04o(A) (see Attachment 2).There is no minimum award set in ordinance.The City uses minimum awards for other programs such as annual grants from the U.S.Housing and Urban Development Department(HUD) and the Capital Improvement Program or CIP(See policy question #3).Grant recipients must submit documentation for reimbursements and file quarterly reports with the City. Some local businesses could be ineligible depending on the minimum award amount. Scoring: Eligible applications were scored on a scale of zero to too with higher scores being better.Identifying information such as names and addresses were removed from applications before the Community Recovery Committee reviewed and scored them.This was done to improve the integrity of the process.See Attachment 3 for a summary list of all 157 eligible local business applications ordered from highest to lowest combined score. The attachment shows average scores in the second to last column which is an average of all Committee member's scores who ranked the application. Funding Recommendations:The 31 local business applications are recommended to receive a grant award based on a sliding scale rather than the full eligible funding amount.The Administration provided this example: "if an applicant had an eligible funding amount of$1o,000 and received an average Committee score of 9o.o,then their final funding amount would be$9,000."The sliding scale approach results in less funding to applicants but spreads the limited ARPA dollars to more applicants. Future Phases:The Administration reports the 31 local business grant awards recommended to the Council are Phase 1 Group 1.Phase 1 Group 2 will be nonprofit grant award recommendations.Note at the time of publishing staff was clarifying with the City Attorney's Office whether nonprofits could also be considered local businesses in the context of this funding.Applications for Phase 2 are expected to be accepted during a 3o-day window beginning in March.The timing of funding recommendations for Phase 2 applicants will depend upon how many eligible applications are received.No Phase 3 is planned;the full$4 million is expected to be recommended for awards during the two phases.Applications not recommended for funding in Phase 1 would need to reapply in Phase 2(see policy question#4). Funding Log(Attachment 1):The log shows the 31 local businesses recommended for funding.Note that when an application is listed as"Received other assistance:None"this means the local business received zero financial assistance from any level of government.The columns moving from left to right are: recommended local business number one through 31,local business name,Council District,amount of funding the local business requested,amount of requested funding that is eligible(must shown proven loss and other ARPA requirements),the Community Recovery Committee's recommended funding,the Council's funding decisions (uses the Committee's amount as a starting point),and the category of AB—Arts and Artisan Businesses,SB— Small Business,and TTH—Tourism,Travel,or Hospitality.Several acronyms are spelled out at the end. Spending Deadlines: Under federal guidelines ARPA funds must be obligated by the end of calendar year 2024 and must be fully spent by the end of calendar year 2026.City Code Chapter 2.20.050 (see Attachment 2)sets an earlier spending deadline of December 31, 2024,to provide public benefits at a faster pace. Community Recovery Committee (See Attachment z for the ordinance) In April 2022,the Council enacted Chapter 2.20 of Salt Lake City Code creating the time-limited Community Recovery Committee as an official City board. Section 2.20.o6o of the ordinance identifies a sunset for the Page 14 Committee once all the ARPA program funds are expended or the federal spending deadline has passed.The Committee reviews applications and makes funding recommendations to the Mayor and City Council for the ARPA local business and nonprofit assistance grants.The Committee has seven or nine members who also serve on other City boards or committees. Grant Categories (See Attachment 2 for the ordinance) No specific categories are identified for the business assistance grants.These grants are focused on small and local businesses,tourism,travel,or hospitality,and support for artists and artisan businesses.A business must first demonstrate an economic and/or operational hardship caused by the pandemic,and then propose an ARPA eligible use for the grant funds. Specific categories are identified for the nonprofit assistance grants which are: "offering services to retrain displaced workers;providing legal or other assistance for evictions or rent relief; expanding educational opportunities;deploying resources to mitigate the digital divide; supporting parents or children affected by COVID-19 including childcare or after school programs; and providing access to healthcare services including mental health support."(2.20.040(A))Note nonprofits may submit applications for programs not listed above. ATTACHMENTS 1. Local Business Assistance ARPA Grants Funding Log 2. Community Recovery Committee Chapter 2.20 of Salt Lake City Code 3. Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Committee Score ACRONYMS(from this staff report and Attachment 1 Funding Log) AB—Arts and Artisan Businesses ARPA—American Rescue Plan Act BIPOC—Black,Indigenous,and People of Color CAN—Community and Neighborhoods Department CCL—Child Care Licensing CIP—Capital Improvement Program EIDL—Economic Injury Disaster Loan FY—Fiscal Year HUD—United States Housing and Urban Development Department IRC—International Rescue Committee LLC—Limited Liability Company PPP—Federal Paycheck Protection Program SB—Small Business SBDC—Utah Small Business Development Center TBD—To De Determined TTH—Tourism,Travel,or Hospitality Page 5 ARPA Community Grant Program Phase One Distribution, Group One - Community Recovery Committee Recommendation DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC IT�� DEVELOPMENT Requested Op During the February 21 It presentation, Council requested funding options that would include expanding the list of applicants to receive funding during this Phase 1 Group 1 request. (Hybrift. • Approve the original request AND add 11 additional applicants (scores 78.0 -79.5) Continue with Phase 2 (without bonus points - CRC, or with bonus points -75.0+) Approve the current request AND add bonus points (scores 70.0+) Award all funds now to small business applicants until all $1 ,500,000 is exhausted 0 Option D (Original Request, CRC Recommendation): Approve the original request AND allow Phase 2 to proceed without any preference to applicants who have applied before DEPARTMENTot v u 't9ECONOMIC <: K r'T DEVELOPMENT t a rJ„ �t j 4k DEPARTMENTof ECONOMIC Quest'ions ?. Uc,„uti a� DEVELOPMENT I!IiYI,Vh � rt u Option A-Rounded 2022-2024 2022-2024 ELIGIBLE 2022-2024 CRC REQUESTED FUNDING RECOMMENDATION # BUSINESS APPLICANT DISTRICT FUNDING (Proven Loss) (%Based on Score) CATEGORY 1 IJunction Dance Company(63480) 5 $50,000.00 1 $49,000.00 $45,900.00 AB Business provides dance training,two dance companies,creative space and performance opportunities for youth and professional artists. They cultivate an artistically enriching community through performance and outreach. Type of Business: Dance Studio(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Rent,utilities,and operating costs(pay contracted artists) Received other assistance:None 2 Zahara,LLC(62879) 5 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $6,600.00 TTH Moroccan pop-up restaurant,that also offers catering services. Business holds community events that last between 2-3 hours where food is served. Owner plans to re-establish their events,and catering services,along with building to transition to a permanent physical location. Type of Business: Restaurant(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,venue rentals and staff costs. Received other assistance:Business received$2k from the International Rescue Committee for business expenses accrued during COVID-19. 3 Sugar Space,LLC(63372) 1 2 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 1 $46,300.00 SB Business is an arts,events and reception center. They provide space for artists of all disciplines to create and present work and a place for the community to celebrate, learn,share and engage. Type of Business: Event/Reception Center(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Salaries and wages for staff. Received other assistance:Yes,they received under$50k in other assistance with PPP and EIDL. 4 Dream Garden Press/dba Ken Sanders Rare Books(63434) 1 4 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 $46,102.00_____j AB This business sells used,new,and rare books and ephemera. Special focus for this business is Utah and regional history. This business all supports local artists and musicians with regular public events. Type of Business: Bookstore in the City Center(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent and payroll. Received other assistance:Received approx..$75k of other assistance with PPP and EIDL 5 1 Zaater and Zayton(62465) 1 2 1 $50,000.00 1 $38,000.00 1 $35,000.00 TTH Business is a full-service catering company offering a unique blend of traditional Middle Eastern Cuisine and American fusion. Type of Business: Catering Disproportionately Impacted:Women& 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Mortgage payment,operational costs and start-up costs Received other assistance:Yes. Received$20k in EIDL 6 Mestizo,LLC(63831) 1 3 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 $45,900.00 TTH Business is a coffee house created by community for community. The founders envisioned a place for civic engagement and sharing art to strengthen community. Type of Business: Coffeehouse(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,operating costs and wages. Received other assistance:None 7 Noor Al Sham LLC(63326) 5 $11,000.00 $10,758.00 $9,700.00 SB Catering business looking to complete start up and expand. Type of Business: Food-Catering(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC Owned Use of funds:Start up costs,rent,payroll and operational expenses. Received other assistance:Received under$3,000 in PPP funding. 8 Susie M's Gallery of Fine Tattooing(63355) 5 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $22,300.00 SB Business provides an art studio with retail space,along with tattooing education space. Type of Business: Tattoo Parlor-Retail Space(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent and payroll. Received other assistance:None 9 J Street Productions(60538) 1 7 1 $26,000.00 $25,000.00 $22,200.00 1 AB Writer who writes novels for young readers(middle grades and young adult). Writes nonfictions on the intersection of art and faith,and also consults freelance writers and provides editorial services for other writers. Type of Business: Writer(Home Based,Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Salary and Operating Expenses(will have to provide tax documents,etc.) Received other assistance:None 10 Arts of the World Gallery(63518) 1 5 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 1 $44,000.00 1 AB Business is the local home for global treasures.This business houses traditional(indigenous)arts and crafts and also traditional industries like ceramics in two historic buildings that have been maintained and preserved. Type of Business: Art Gallery(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Utilities,and operating expenses Received other assistance:Yes.Received less than$50k in Salt Lake County grant,and PPP funds I Premier Paralegal Solutions,LLC(59841) 1 5 1 $50,000.00 $9,000.00 $7,800.00 SB Business provides legal document preparation,tax preparation and some translation services. Services provided to clients with digital equity issues that require in person attention. Type of Business: Legal Services(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Rent,payroll,supplies and start-up costs. Received other assistance:Yes,less than$50k in BIDE and PPP 12 Cycling Utah,LLC(63477) 4 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 $43,200.00 SB Business produces a bicycling magazine and website. They are in their 30th year of business providing information,news,rips and event calendars. They distribute throughout Salt Lake City and the western United States. Type of Business: Magazine(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Operating costs and payroll. Received other assistance:Yes. Received less than$50k in PPP funds 13 Golden Gyros(63448) 1 5 $50,000.00 1 $47,000.00 $40,200.00 TTH Local restaurant in Salt Lake City. One of the first restaurants to close due to COVID-19 trying to keep doors open on their start up business that opened as the pandemic hit. Type of Business: Restaurant Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,wages,and equipment. Received other assistance:None 14 Amie Engberg(62853) 5 $38,000.00 $38,000.00 $32,200.00 SB Document preparation and financial education services for chiropractors. Type of Business: Financial Education Services(Home Based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Supplies and salary Received other assistance:None 15 1 Six Sailor Cider,LLC(63232) 1 4 1 $50,000.00 1 $11,000.00 1 $9,300.00 1 TTH Business makes a variety of flavored apple ciders,non-alcoholic and sparkling hard ciders to be sold in the future. Started their sales in farmer's markets and now expanding into online and retail sales. Type of Business: Brewery(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent,payroll and startup costs. Received other assistance:None 16 Bye Phoebe(59674) 3 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,200.00 AB Owner is a model,fashion stylist and also makes custom clothing for production companies. Type of Business: Stylist/Clothing(Home Based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women&100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Equipment,materials,payroll and startup costs. Received other assistance:Yes received$1,200 from Artist Emergency Fund 17 Sikkim Momo(59832) 1 2 $49,000.00 $3,100.00 $2,600.00 TTH Business is a catering food business. This entrepreneur is from the Spice Kitchen incubator program of the International Rescue Committee. Type of Business: Catering Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies and equipment. Received other assistance:Business received$2k from the International Rescue Committee. 18 Christina's Barber Shop(60332) 1 5 $13,500.00 $14,000.00 $11,600.00 SB Business is a barber shop specializing in gentlemen haircuts located on 300 West. Type of Business: Barber shop(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent,utilities,and operating expenses. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k from EIDL. 19 Flamenco del Lago(63429) 1 5 $50,000.00 $13,000.00 $10,800.00 AB Business is a nonprofit under the direction of Katie Sheen-Abbott she's studied Flamenco for many years. She teaches and performs flamenco in Salt Lake City and throughout Utah for all ages and abilities. Type of Business: Dance teacher(Sole Proprietor&Nonprofit) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent,and equipment costs. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k in EIDL funding. 20 Dayhouse Studio(61894) 1 7 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 1 $41,400.00 1 SB Business is a biophilic interior design studio specializing in residential and commercial spaces. Improving health,well-being and sustainable practices are at the heart of their work. Type of Business: Interior Design Studio(Home based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Operating costs and payroll. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k from EIDL. 21 ISeth Ian Photography(62887) 1 3 $15,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,800.00 AB Photographer for the performing arts,small businesses,and real estate.Business is also undertaking documentary projects. Type of Business: Photographer(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Equipment upgrades and project development costs Received other assistance:None 22 Worthfull Media,LLC(60612) 3 $25,000.00 1 $25,000.00 $20,700.00 AB Boutique media production house that records,edits,produces,and manages audio and video for small business owners and personal brands.The bulk of business is for podcasters and YouTubers,but includes making related media as well. Type of Business:Media production(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds:Website upgrades,rent,contract costs Received other assistance:PPP and EIDL funds around$5k. 23 iDesign to Grow,LLC(63108) 77J 4 $32,000.00 1 $32,000.00 $26,200.00 AB Business is a designibuild studio that does in house fabrication focused on public art,teaching/workshops,events,and commercial furniture. Type of Business:Design studio(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent,retaining employees Received other assistance:PPP$8.7K,Small Business Impact Grant$9.9k 24 Suzanne May(60330) 1 7 $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 $8,100.00 AB Singer/songwriter that also teaches voice and songwriting lessons from home studio. Type of Business:Musician(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds:Tour and equipment costs. Received other assistance:EIDL$12k,Unemployment$8k 25 1 The Twist(Kirk's Ship,LLC)(60520) 4 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $40,000.00 TTH Business is a Restaurant,Bar&Nightclub Type of Business:Bar/Restaurant Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Wages,retain employees Received other assistance:PPP&Employee Retention Credit over$50k 26 Elegant Tailoring,LLC(61865) 4 $50,000.00 $21,335.00 $17,100.00 SB Business is a tailoring shop in the heart of downtown. Type of Business:Tailoring Shop(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Payroll and operational expenses. Received other assistance:Business received less than$6,000.00 in PPP funding. 27 Utah Hispanic Chamber of Commerce(62544) 2 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,900.00 SB Chamber of Commerce serving Hispanic businesses. Type of Business:Chamber of Commerce Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Wages Received other assistance:None 28 Utah Fitness Institute(62189) 5 $21,502.00 $22,000.00 $17,600.00 SB Personal training and wellness retreat business. Type of Business:Fitness Studio(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent costs Received other assistance:Salt Lake County grant$22k 29 Match and Farnsworth,PC(62089) 4 $49,000.00 $49,000.00 $39,000.00 SB Business is a small private law firm that provides representation to individuals who are unable to work due to physical or mental disabilities. Type of Business:Law Firm(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds:Payroll Received other assistance:Business received more than$50k from PPP. 30 Antidote Cosmeceuticals,LLC(60991) 6 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $6,400.00 SB Business manufactures bottles and sells skin care products. Type of Business:Skin care(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Facility upgrades and payroll Received other assistance:None 31 lFirst Steps,Inc.(60261) 1 $50,000.00 $12,000.00 $9,200.00 SB Business is a child care center. Type of Business:Daycare Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Facility upgrades and payroll Received other assistance:PPP,EIDL,&CCL Stabilization Grant-over$200k 32 CathPro Technologies(62544) 1 7 $28,000.00 $28,000.00 $22,300.00 SB Business owns intellectual property and is associated with technology platforms in the medical device sector. Type of Business: R&D Medical Devices Disproportionately Impacted:BIPOC Use of funds:Rent,start up,operating expenses Received other assistance:EIDL,Small Business Catalyst Grant-less than$50k 33 10skar&Julia Music LLC(59713) 3 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $8,000.00 AB Musicians who record,perform and sell merchandise. Type of Business: Recording Music Disproportionately Impacted: None Use of funds:Operating expenses,supplies. Received other assistance:None 34 Mago LLC dba Diggity Dog Resort(61569) 2 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,500.00 SB Dog boarding and daycare facility. Type of Business: Dog care resort Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds: Wages Received other assistance: Received PPP-over$50k 35 Namash Swahili Cuisine(63291) 2 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $7,900.00 TTH African cuisine food truck which sells authentic food from Africa using unique family recipes. Type of Business: Food Truck Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds: Equipment and operating expenses Received other assistance: Spice Kitchen-$2k 36 Salt Lake Capoeira&Brazilian Jiu Jitsu(61693) 7 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,500.00 AB Afro-Brazilian Capoeira and Brazilian Jiu Jitsu education and performance business. Type of Business: Capoeira&Brazilian Jiu Jitsu Education Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Operating expenses Received other assistance: EIDL,Artists Emergency Funds,SLC Chamber Grant,PPP-less than$50k 37 Kate Mamai LLC(60765) 2 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,200.00 TTH Catering and food truck business. Type of Business: Catering and Food Truck Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds: Operating costs Received other assistance: SBA-under$50k 38 Total Body Pilates(63317) 6 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $15,700.00 SB Salt Lake City business since 1999,teaching pilates and physical wellness. Type of Business: Pilates studio Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds: Rent and utilities Received other assistance: None 39 Tippetts Builders LLC(63559) 4 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $6,300.00 SB General contractor residential construction. Type of Business: Construction Disproportionately Impacted: None Use of funds: Operating expenses and equipment Received other assistance: None 40 Les Madeleines LLC(63537) 1 4 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 $39,100.00 TTH French pastry shop that has been part of the downtown community since 2003. Also an e-commerce shop since 2008. Type of Business: Pastry Shop Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds: Wages,rent and operating expenses Received other assistance: Received PPP-over$50k 41 Halab's Jasmine Kitchen(61158) 2 $6,050.00 $6,050.00 $4,800.00 TTH Food truck that offers Syrian and Eastern Mediterranean cuisine throughout Salt Lake City. Type of Business: Food truck Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds: Operating expenses Received other assistance: Spice Kitchen grant,Neighborworks grant-less than$50k 42 Utah Brewers Guild(63442) 1 4 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,000.00 SB Business supports Utah craft brewing manufacturers and small businesses with direct programming,education and advocacy. Type of Business:Business alliance Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Wages and operating costs Received other assistance:EIDL-$19,000 2/13/23,2:29 PM https://export.am legal.com/api/export-requests/eaa5fce7-9601-4be0-8a48-9cb553893360/download/ CHAPTER 2.20 COMMUNITY RECOVERY COMMITTEE SECTION: 2.20.010: Purpose 2.20.020: Responsibilities 2.20.030: Membership 2.20.040: Community Grant Program 2.20.050: Minimum Requirements For Community Grant Program Applications 2.20.060: Sunset 2.20.010: PURPOSE: The Community Recovery Committee will assist with and oversee the distribution of certain Rescue Plan funds under the City's community grant program. Consistent with this Chapter, the Community Recovery Committee will review applications for community grant program funding and make funding recommendations to the Mayor. The Mayor shall review the Community Recovery Committee's recommendations and make a final recommendation on the use of funds to the City Council. (Ord. 17-22, 2022) 2.20.020: RESPONSIBILITIES: The Community Recovery Committee will: A. Advise and make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council on decisions related to the City's community grant program. B. Coordinate with relevant City departments on the review and evaluation of current strategic plans, goals, and policies of the departments' grant programs. C. Review all eligible project proposals submitted by various business, and nonprofit organizations for the community grant program and to make recommendations to the Mayor on such requests for funds. D. Monitor the community grant program and ensure that the program is being implemented as planned and the funds from the program are utilized as recommended and approved by the Council. E. Help ensure that the community grant program goals are consistent with the strategic plans and goals of the City and are consistent with the federal requirements for utilization of Rescue Plan funds. F. Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the community grant program. G. Consider geographic equity in the overall funding recommendations to the Mayor and Council under the community grant program. (Ord. 17-22, 2022) 2.20.030: MEMBERSHIP: A. The Community Recovery Committee shall be made up of a total of seven (7) or nine (9) members, with at least three (3) members from the Human Rights Commission, one (1) member from the Business Advisory Board, up to three (3) members from the Racial Equity in Policing Commission, one (1) member from the Economic Development Loan Fund Committee and one (1) member from the Salt Lake Arts Council. B. Members of the Community Recovery Committee will be appointed by the Salt Lake City Mayor with the advice and consent of the City Council. Individuals appointed to the Community Recovery Committee will be authorized under City Code to serve on two (2) City boards. (Ord. 50-22, 2022: Ord. 17-22, 2022) 2.20.040: COMMUNITY GRANT PROGRAM: The Administration will create the community grant program to efficiently deploy the Rescue Plan community grant program funds utilizing the following policies and objectives: https://export.amIegal.com/api/export-req uests/eaa5fce7-9601-4be0-8a48-9cb553893360/download/ 1/2 2/13/23,2:29 PM https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/eaa5fce7-9601-4be0-8a48-9cb553893360/download/ A. No single application for a community grant will exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). B. Any application for a community grant to a nonprofit organization will focus on supporting communities disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including, but not limited to, by offering services to retrain displaced workers; providing legal or other assistance for evictions or rent relief; expanding educational opportunities; deploying resources to mitigate the digital divide; supporting parents or children affected by COVID-19 including childcare or after school programs; and providing access to healthcare services, including mental health support. C. Any application for a community grant for local business will focus on supporting the business's operations or employees who have been economically affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. (Ord. 17-22, 2022) 2.20.050: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMUNITY GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATIONS: Community grant program applications for either nonprofit organizations or local businesses will include, at a minimum, the following information to be considered by the Community Recovery Committee: A. The amount of community grant funds the organization is seeking and how the nonprofit organization or local businesses intends to use the proposed funds. B. Affirmation, after consultation with the City's Finance Department, that the proposed use is eligible under the federal Rescue Plan guidelines and that the applicant will be able to spend the funds by December 31, 2024. C. Identification of how the proposed grant will meet the City's objectives of supporting underserved communities, mitigating economic impacts on local businesses or arts organizations, or mitigating the effects of COVID-19 on the community. (Ord. 17-22, 2022) 2.20.060: SUNSET: Upon either full expenditure of the Rescue Plan funds, or expiration of the deadline to expend such funds, the Community Recovery Committee shall cease to exist under City Code, unless the City Council expands the scope of the Community Recovery Committee's responsibilities, in which case the Community Recovery Committee will remain in effect. (Ord. 17-22, 2022) https://export.amIegal.com/api/export-req uests/eaa5fce7-9601-4be0-8a48-9cb553893360/download/ 2/2 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 100%female-owned; 1 Arts&Culture business Junction Dance Co 60 36 102 110 103 60 60 30 561 93.5 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) 100%minority owned; 2 Travel,Tourism,or Zahara LLC 41 47 84 87 88 50 50 20 467 93.4 5 Hos italit 3 100%female-owned Sugar Space LLC 36 44 102 114 109 60 60 30 555 92.5 6 Business in the City Center(between North Temple and 400 South, and 200 East to I-15); Dream Garden 4 Arts&Culture business Press: DBA Ken 13 37 96 95 95 50 50 25 461 92.2 5 (arts,musicians,etc.); Sanders Rare Books Travel,Tourism,or Hospitality 100%female-owned; 5 100%minority owned; Zaater and Zayton 41 41 93 104 103 60 60 50 552 92.0 6 Travel,Tourism,or Hospitality Business in the City Center(between North 6 Temple and 400 South, Mestizo LLC 50 36 96 73 79 50 50 25 459 91.8 5 and 200 East to I-15); Travel,Tourism,or 100%minofity 7 owned;Travel,Tourism Noor Al Sham,LLC 44 54 79 106 101 60 60 35 539 89.8 6 or Hospitality 8 100%female-owned Susie M's Gallery of 60 50 94 99 96 60 60 15 534 89.0 6 Fine Tattooing 100%female-owned; 9 Arts&Culture business J Street Productions 70 50 127 107 115 60 60 30 619 88.4 7 (arts,musicians,etc.) Inc. Page 1 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 100%female-owned; Arts&Culture business 10 (arts,musicians,etc.); Arts of the World 29 54 92 97 86 60 60 50 528 88.0 6 Travel,Tourism,or Gallery Hospitality 11 100%female-owned; Premier Paralegal 36 40 107 98 89 60 60 30 520 86.7 6 100%minority owned Solutions LLC r14 NONE of these C clin Utah,Inc. 39 44 112 101 102 60 60 0 518 86.3 6 100%minority owned; Travel,Tourism,or Golden Gyros 60 56 88 69 84 60 60 35 512 85.3 6 Hos italic 100%female-owned Amie Engberg 60 47 99 88 93 60 60 0 507 84.5 6 15 Travel,Tourism,or Six Sailor Cider 50 39 76 68 66 50 50 20 419 83.8 5 Hospitality LLC 100%female-owned; 100%minority owned; 16 Arts&Culture business Phoebe Davenport 40 50 86 81 79 60 60 45 501 83.5 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) 100%female-owned; 17 100%minority owned; Sikkim Memo 50 52 83 83 92 30 60 50 500 83.3 6 Travel,Tourism,or Hospitality 18 100%female-owned Christina's Barber 27 35 101 100 84 60 60 30 497 82.8 6 op 100%female-owned; Arts&Culture business 19 Flamenco del Lago 55 34 88 86 84 60 60 30 497 82.8 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) 20 100%female-owned www.DayhouseStudi 35 43 106 83 94 60 60 15 496 82.7 6 o.com Arts&Culture business Seth Ian 21 (arts,musicians,etc.) Photography 60 46 91 84 80 60 60 15 496 82.7 6 Page 2 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 100%female-owned; Arts&Culture business Worthfull Media 22 43 39 91 85 87 60 60 30 495 82.5 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) LLC Arts&Culture business Design to Grow 23 (arts,musicians,etc.) LLC 39 26 95 99 96 60 60 15 490 81.7 6 100%female-owned; Arts&Culture business 24 Suzanne May 40 49 88 76 79 60 60 30 482 80.3 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) Business in the City Center(between North 25 Temple and 400 South, Kirk's Ship,LLC 8 47 109 90 95 60 60 10 479 79.8 6 and 200 East to 1-15); Travel,Tourism,or Hospitality 26 100%minority owned Eleganit Tailoring 46 42 96 64 81 60 60 30 479 79.8 6 LC 100%minority owned Utah Hispanic 27 Chamber of 60 58 106 87 92 0 60 15 478 79.7 6 Commerce 28 NONE of these Utah Fitness 36 53 92 86 91 60 60 0 478 79.7 6 Institute 29 100%female-owned Match and 4 60 79 91 93 60 60 30 477 79.5 6 Farnsworth,PC 30 NONE of these Antidote 60 41 91 84 77 60 60 0 473 78.8 6 Cosmeceuticals 31 First Steps Inc 4 39 97 83 99 60 60 15 457 76.2 6 100%minority owned; 32 Travel,Tourism,or Salaama 60 56 79 88 81 60 60 35 519 86.5 6 Hos italit Page 3 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 100%female-owned; 33 Arts&Culture business Salt&Honey 25 44 104 109 105 30 60 30 507 84.5 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) Market LLC Business is at least 50% 34 minority owned;Travel, HK Brewing 39 32 103 99 93 40 60 20 486 81.0 6 Tourism,or Hospitality Collective 100%minority owned; Arts&Culture business 35 Michael Pugh 70 60 101 89 93 60 60 30 563 80.4 7 (arts,musicians,etc.) 36 100%minority owned CathPro 45 21 99 87 90 60 60 15 477 79.5 6 Technologies Arts&Culture business 37 (arts,musicians,etc.) Sri Whipple 37 41 81 84 83 60 60 30 476 79.3 6 Arts&Culture business Oskar&Julia Music 38 (arts,musicians,etc.) LLC 60 41 91 92 87 30 60 15 476 79.3 6 100%female-owned MAGO LLC DBA 39 7 50 92 85 90 60 60 30 474 79.0 6 Diggity Dog Resort 100%minority owned; Namash Swahili 40 Travel,Tourism,or Cuisine 51 43 74 82 69 60 60 35 474 79.0 6 Hospitality 41 NONE of these Antidote 60 41 91 84 77 60 60 0 473 78.8 6 Cosmeceuticals 42 Salt Lake Capoeira 34 40 81 88 91 0 60 0 394 78.8 5 &Brazilian Jiu Jitsu 100%minority owned; 43 Travel,Tourism,or kafe mamai 11c 32 40 75 81 87 60 60 35 470 78.3 6 Hospitality 44 100%female-owned Total Body Pilates 60 30 78 84 83 60 60 15 470 78.3 6 Page 4 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score NONE of these Tippetts Builders 45 LLC 60 58 94 94 89 60 0 15 470 78.3 6 F47 100%female-owned; Travel,Tourism,or Les Madeleines LLC 2 44 93 84 91 60 60 35 469 78.2 6 Hos italit100%minority owned; Halab's Jasmine Travel,Tourism,or Kitchen 48 38 86 91 80 30 60 35 468 78.0 6 Hospitality 48 NONE of these Utah Brewers Guild 33 35 76 85 86 0 60 15 390 78.0 5 100%female-owned; Utah Arts&Cultural Arts&Culture business Coalition dba Utah 49 (arts,musicians,etc.) Cultural Alliance 43 31 93 99 96 0 60 45 467 77.8 6 Foundation 100%minority owned; Arts&Culture business 50 Jaguar Occult 60 17 78 77 70 60 60 45 467 77.8 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) 100%female-owned; Business in the City Center(between North 51 Temple and 400 South, Eighteen Percent 3 33 76 90 95 60 60 50 467 77.8 6 and 200 East to 1-15); Gray Arts&Culture business (arts,musicians,etc.) 100%minority owned; 52 Travel,Tourism,or Delicius 49 52 93 84 92 60 0 35 465 77.5 6 Hospitality 100%minority owned; Villalba&Rikli 53 Travel,Tourism,or LLC 8 47 96 79 78 60 60 35 463 77.2 6 Hospitality Page 5 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 100%minority owned; Business in the City U.S. Translation 54 Center(between North Company 0 39 100 84 84 60 60 35 462 77.0 6 Temple and 400 South, and 200 East to I-15 100%minority owned; Jamaica's Kitchen 55 Travel,Tourism,or LLC 45 17 78 82 84 60 60 35 461 76.8 6 Hos italit Arts&Culture business Wasatch Theatre 56 (arts,musicians,etc.) Company of Salt 60 35 65 71 78 60 60 30 459 76.5 6 Lake Count TANKINZ 57 NOODLE MFG. 2 57 85 100 96 60 60 0 460 76.7 6 LLC 100%female-owned; 58 Travel,Tourism,or Custom Travel,LLC 22 32 96 99 96 30 60 20 455 75.8 6 Hos italit Business in the City Center(between North Temple and 400 South, and 200 East to I-15); Lyman&Brown 59 Arts&Culture business LLC 60 23 70 75 71 60 60 35 454 75.7 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) Arts&Culture business Rhythms of Life, 60 (arts,musicians,etc.) LLC 52 26 104 91 90 0 60 30 453 75.5 6 100%female-owned; 61 Travel,Tourism,or CytyByrd 2 45 104 77 84 60 60 20 452 75.3 6 Hospitality Business in the City 62 Center(between North Rocky Mountain 60 26 101 101 98 0 60 5 451 75.2 6 Temple and 400 South, Innocence Center and 200 East to I-15 Page 6 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 63 100%female-owned STAY Design LLC 34 36 87 71 73 60 60 30 451 75.2 6 64 NONE of these Jeremiah Kephart 60 31 76 84 74 60 60 0 445 74.2 6 100%minority owned; 65 Travel,Tourism,or Sapa LLC 1 47 90 85 81 60 60 20 444 74.0 6 Hospitality 100%minority owned; 66 Travel,Tourism,or Balabe LLC 45 37 70 65 72 60 60 35 444 74.0 6 Hospitality Arts&Culture business Salt Lake Music 67 (arts,musicians,etc.) School Foundation 2 53 94 97 107 0 60 30 443 73.8 6 DBA Gifted Music School 100%female-owned; 68 Arts&Culture business Art Haus 34 42 89 88 83 60 0 45 441 73.5 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) 69 100%female-owned L.L. Hair&Beauty 40 37 77 78 74 60 60 15 441 73.5 6 Elizabeth Lavoie 100%minority owned; 70 Travel,Tourism,or Nohm,LLC 3 46 101 83 83 30 60 35 441 73.5 6 Hospitality 71 Travel,Tourism,or Olio Products Co. 60 40 66 75 75 60 60 5 441 73.5 6 Hospitality 72 100%female-owned troubadour 11c 33 40 76 73 66 60 60 30 438 73.0 6 73 Travel,Tourism,or Soul Traveler LLC 3 39 98 98 90 30 60 20 438 73.0 6 Hospitality 74 NONE of these Torrent Cycle LLC 35 38 73 94 92 30 60 15 437 72.8 6 Arts&Culture business 75 (arts,musicians,etc.) John Schaefer 38 35 76 73 79 60 60 15 436 72.7 6 100%minority owned; Arts&Culture business 76 Lazy Llama Ecowear 33 38 78 67 69 60 60 30 435 72.5 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) 77 CUPRO 47 12 75 93 88 60 60 0 435 1 72.5 6 TECHNOLOGIES Page 7 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 100%minority owned; African Mini Mart 78 Travel,Tourism,or LLC 58 39 95 87 91 30 0 35 435 72.5 6 Hos italit 100%minority owned; Business in the City Center(between North Alamarie Twisted 79 Temple and 400 South, Roots 17 30 81 81 81 60 60 25 435 72.5 6 and 200 East to I-15); Travel,Tourism,or 80 100%minority owned Shrimp Shak LLC 60 37 58 63 67 60 60 30 435 72.5 6 100%female-owned Kyle George 81 Photography Inc. 30 33 95 75 74 30 60 30 427 71.2 6 DBA Rev Physical Therapy 100%minority owned The Salt Lake 82 Barber Company 2 37 91 77 84 60 60 15 426 71.0 6 LLC 83 Travel,Tourism,or Pago LLC 0 44 75 80 86 60 60 20 425 70.8 6 Hospitality Business in the City Center(between North Temple and 400 South, Copperfield 84 and 200 East to I-15); Publishing 0 45 73 88 90 30 60 35 421 70.2 6 Arts&Culture business (arts,musicians,etc.) Arts&Culture business 85 (arts,musicians,etc.) The Leonardo 0 48 93 91 99 0 60 30 421 70.2 6 100%minority owned; 86 Travel,Tourism,or Overseas Grocery 27 41 57 73 67 60 60 35 420 70.0 6 Hospitality Page 8 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 100%female-owned; Business in the City Center(between North 87 Temple and 400 South, Torrey House Press 7 47 81 100 90 0 60 35 420 70.0 6 and 200 East to 1-15); Arts&Culture business (arts,musicians,etc.) Business in the City Center(between North Temple and 400 South, and 200 East to 1-15); Wiseguys Comedy, 88 Arts&Culture business Inc. 0 23 45 69 72 50 50 40 349 69.8 5 (arts,musicians,etc.); Travel,Tourism,or Hospitality 89 100%minority owned Joshua Lucero,LLC 34 14 79 72 70 60 60 30 419 69.8 6 100%minority owned; MAIZE FOOD 90 Travel,Tourism,or TRUCK LLC 11 41 71 96 89 30 60 20 418 69.7 6 Hospitality 91 NONE of these Express CCleaners 19 43 78 73 70 60 60 15 418 69.7 6 Travel Tourism or The Chocolate 92 50 48 78 71 78 0 0 20 345 69.0 5 lHospitality Cons irac 100%female-owned; Arts&Culture business Reflective Art 93 43 43 76 84 76 60 0 30 412 68.7 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) Studio Arts&Culture business Salt Lake Film 94 (arts,musicians,etc.) Society 1 38 94 103 99 0 60 15 410 68.3 6 1000 female-owned; 95 Travel,Tourism,or Sugar House Coffee 2 39 86 86 87 30 60 20 410 68.3 6 Hospitality Page 9 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 100%female-owned; Business in the City Center(between North Iguana LLC DBA 96 Temple and 400 South, Blue Iguana 0 48 69 83 84 60 40 25 409 68.2 6 and 200 East to 1-15); Travel,Tourism,or Arts&Culture business Pygmalion 97 (arts,musicians,etc.) Productions Inc. dba 59 24 93 94 92 0 15 30 407 67.8 6 Pygmalion Theatre Company 100%female-owned; Alexander Cole Arts&Culture business 98 Investment Group, 3 37 90 87 99 60 0 30 406 67.7 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) LLC 100%minority owned; 99 Travel,Tourism,or GLOBAL PLACE 38 16 64 69 64 60 60 35 406 67.7 6 Hospitality Business in the City Center(between North 100 Temple and 400 South, Salt Lake Bicycle 38 37 68 57 59 60 60 25 404 67.3 6 and 200 East to 1-15); Tours LLC Travel,Tourism,or Travel,Tourism,or McDonough 101 Hospitality Enterprises,Inc. 34 28 81 72 64 60 60 5 404 67.3 6 dba brio COFFEE Arts&Culture business Salt Lake Acting 102 (arts,musicians,etc.) Company 0 47 88 95 97 0 60 15 402 67.0 6 103 Travel,Tourism,or Fice LLC 31 38 82 81 74 30 60 5 401 66.8 6 lHospitality Page to Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 100%female-owned Utah Gay&Lesbian Chamber of 104 Commerce DBA 37 4 90 98 97 0 60 15 401 66.8 6 Utah LGBTQ+ Chamber of Commerce Business in the City Center(between North Temple and 400 South, 105 and 200 East to 1-15); Utah Arts Alliance 0 29 87 88 98 0 60 35 397 66.2 6 Arts&Culture business (arts,musicians,etc.) Arts&Culture business 106 (arts,musicians,etc.) Art Access 10 24 87 93 91 0 60 30 395 65.8 6 Business in the City 107 Center(between North Array Salon LLC 14 46 72 67 70 60 60 5 394 65.7 6 Temple and 400 South, and 200 East to 1-15) 100%female-owned Someday Society LLC(currently, changed from 108 previous CC 38 31 72 78 78 30 50 15 392 65.3 6 Collective LLC; before that CC&the Coiffarists 109 NONE of these Inkyn 30 32 77 76 78 55 40 0 388 64.7 6 100%female-owned; Business in the City Center(between North Blind Pig,LLC. 110 Temple and 400 South, DBA The Rest 0 30 57 76 78 60 60 25 386 64.3 6 and 200 East to 1-15); Travel,Tourism,or 111 100%female-owned Sparkle On,LLC 10 15 72 65 73 60 60 30 385 64.2 6 Page 11 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score NONE of these Trailside 112 Professional Dry 11 50 98 81 84 0 60 0 384 64.0 6 Cleaners 100%female-owned; Arts&Culture business Madison Briggs Fine 113 43 24 50 51 51 60 60 45 384 64.0 6 (arts,musicians,etc.) Art 114 Pathway Associates 60 0 80 89 93 0 60 0 382 63.7 6 115 Travel,Tourism,or LUX Events,Inc 0 54 88 82 77 0 60 20 381 63.5 6 Hospitality 100%female-owned; Business in the City Center(between North 116 Temple and 400 South, Craft Lake City 1 12 82 79 96 0 60 50 380 63.3 6 and 200 East to I-15); Arts&Culture business (arts,musicians,etc.) Travel,Tourism,or Urban Edge Event 117 Hospitality Center DBA Venue 57 10 91 81 76 0 60 5 380 63.3 6 6SIX9 Business in the City I C D C, 118 Center(between North Incorporated DBA 3 45 64 86 85 30 60 5 378 63.0 6 Temple and 400 South, and 200 East to I-15) Dexterity Salon 119 100%female-owned Matrixx Massage Inc 3 46 82 78 79 60 0 30 378 63.0 6 100%minority owned; East West 120 Travel,Tourism,or Connection,LLC 16 56 94 97 92 0 0 20 375 62.5 6 Hospitality Travel,Tourism,or Utah Ski Rental 121 Hospitality Inc./dba Utah Ski& 0 45 75 73 55 60 60 5 373 62.2 6 Golf Page 12 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 100%minority owned; 122 Travel,Tourism,or Noor Restaurant 39 33 70 67 69 60 0 35 373 62.2 6 Hos italit Travel,Tourism,or Church& State 123 Hospitality Spirits LLC DBA 3 37 93 78 80 0 60 20 371 61.8 6 Water Witch Bar Travel,Tourism,or BONA PARTE LLC 124 Hospitality HEMINGWAY 29 12 67 59 59 60 60 20 366 61.0 6 CAFE Arts&Culture business 125 (arts,musicians,etc.) dear new. orleans lie 1 25 66 60 63 60 60 30 365 60.8 6 126 100%female-owned h2blow Salt Lake 27 41 75 72 70 0 0 15 300 60.0 5 City,LLC Arts&Culture business 127 (arts,musicians,etc.) Luminaria SLC 48 11 43 84 83 60 0 30 359 59.8 6 100%minority owned; Business in the City Center(between North 128 Temple and 400 South, Helloo! Digital 16 17 40 56 58 60 60 50 357 59.5 6 and 200 East to 1-15); Media LLC Arts&Culture business (arts,musicians,etc.) Arts&Culture business 129 (arts,musicians,etc.) Visual Art Institute 41 35 93 87 86 0 0 15 357 59.5 6 Arts&Culture business 130 (arts,musicians,etc.) BD Howes 36 25 49 19 52 50 50 15 296 59.2 5 131 Travel,Tourism,or Huber Bros 5 34 77 82 77 60 0 20 355 59.2 6 Hospitality Inc/Ottowear Page 13 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 100%female-owned; Condie's Candy Co 132 Travel,Tourism,or Inc 39 22 65 68 66 0 60 35 355 59.2 6 Hos italit 133 Travel,Tourism,or Blue Copper Coffee 11 58 76 88 96 0 0 20 349 58.2 6 Hospitality Room LLC 134 Travel,Tourism,or RoHa Brewing 3 24 80 84 78 0 60 20 349 58.2 6 Hosoitalitv Project,LLC 135 NONE of these Glide Paddllesports 31 46 66 73 70 0 60 0 346 57.7 6 1 LLC 136 Travel,Tourism,or ORIGINAL UTAH 1 26 87 87 79 0 60 5 345 57.5 6 HosDitalitv WOOLEN MILLS Business in the City Center(between North Temple and 400 South, 137 and 200 East to I-15); Plan-B Theatre 6 35 68 76 65 0 60 35 345 57.5 6 Arts&Culture business (arts,musicians,etc.) 138 Travel,Tourism,or Topless Tours 33 21 63 50 35 60 60 20 342 57.0 6 Hospitality 100%minority owned; 139 Travel,Tourism,or Purgatory Bar,LLC 2 32 69 85 74 60 0 20 342 57.0 6 .Hospitality 100%minority owned; Pacific Seas 140 Travel,Tourism,or Restaurant 0 39 73 64 69 60 0 35 340 56.7 6 Hos italit Business in the City 141 Center(between North Higher Ground 0 35 58 85 81 60 0 20 339 56.5 6 Temple and 400 South, Learning SLC LLC tHospitality 00 East to I-15 14l,Tourism,or Logos Coffee 42 28 68 71 65 0 60 5 339 56.5 6 Company LLC Page 14 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 100%minority owned; Business in the City Center(between North TURMERIK LLC 143 Temple and 400 South, (DBA ZIMBU) 6 21 75 74 70 0 60 25 331 55.2 6 and 200 East to 1-15); Travel,Tourism,or Business in the City Center(between North 144 Temple and 400 South, Beerhive Pub 13 25 53 63 56 50 60 10 330 55.0 6 and 200 East to 1-15); Travel,Tourism,or r145 NONE of these Utah Pride Center 1 46 90 80 94 0 0 15 326 54.3 6 146 Travel,Tourism,or LUX Hospitality 2 21 82 82 72 0 60 5 324 54.0 6 Hos italit Grou Inc 147 Travel,Tourism,or Hospitality Z NECTAR LLC 37 20 59 65 74 0 60 5 320 53.3 6 Business in the City Center(between North 148 Temple and 400 South, Colt Cooper 30 20 77 52 54 60 0 25 318 53.0 6 and 200 East to 1-15); Consulting LLC Travel,Tourism,or Arts&Culture business select sound 149 (arts,musicians,etc.) entertainment LLC 0 24 46 53 58 60 60 15 316 52.7 6 150 Northst r Builders 1 12 72 60 64 30 60 15 314 52.3 6 Inc Business in the City Center(between North 151 Temple and 400 South, Edgeworks Events, 2 25 87 94 85 0 0 10 303 50.5 6 and 200 East to 1-15); LLC Travel,Tourism,or Hospitality Page 15 Attachment 3 - Summary List of Eligible Local Business Assistance ARPA Grant Applications by Average Score Sum of Have Sum of Sum of Please Sum of Sum of Demographic Group Legal Business you received Change in briefly explain Sum of Please Sum of Use Multiple Recieved Sum ofTOTAL AVG. Record # Membership T Name T any other Number of how you were briefly explain of Grant Technical Bonus Owners SCORE SCORE Count assistance Employees impacted your business Funds Score Assistance Score Score 152 Travel,Tourism,or Fisher Brewing 0 40 72 58 70 0 0 5 245 49.0 5 lHospitality Company LLC 153 INONE of these Pivot RnD,LLC 60 9 0 46 48 60 60 0 283 47.2 6 Business in the City Center(between North Ruben James LLC 154 Temple and 400 South, dba Maxwell's East 0 30 14 71 64 60 0 40 279 46.5 6 and 200 East to I-15); Coast Eatery Travel,Tourism,or Hospitality Travel,Tourism,or Temple Grounds 155 Hospitality Coffee Roasters 60 0 0 62 58 30 60 5 275 45.8 6 DBA The Bean Whole Business in the City 156 Center(between North Borboleta Beauty 0 43 45 64 71 0 20 20 263 43.8 6 Temple and 400 South, Inc and 200 East to I-15 157 Travel,Tourism,or Epic Brewing 0 45 72 60 56 0 0 20 253 42.2 6 Hosgitalitx Com an ,LLC Page 16 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Ordinance approving the disbursement of American Rescue Plan Act Community Grant Program Funds for Phase 1) WHEREAS, the global COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the world and local economy at an unprecedented level, and Salt Lake City's nonprofit organizations, local businesses, and residents have been negatively impacted by the economic uncertainty caused by the pandemic. WHEREAS, on March 11, 2021, the U.S. Government signed into law a COVID-19 recovery bill, the American Rescue Plan Act("ARPA") and allocated federal funding to Salt Lake City Corporation ("City") to use for certain COVID-related uses, including to support disproportionately impacted communities and to mitigate negative economic impacts within the community. WHEREAS, on April 19, 2022, the City Council passed Salt Lake City Ordinance 17 of 2022, enacting Salt Lake City Code Chapter 2.20 and establishing a new community grant program to govern the distribution of certain ARPA funds, including the creation of a Community Recovery Committee that is tasked with reviewing grant applications and making recommendations on the disbursement of community recovery grant funds. WHEREAS,beginning in November 2022 and continuing through January 2023, the Community Recovery Committee held ten meetings to review and consider applications from approximately 157 small businesses and 39 nonprofit organizations seeking grant funding for direct economic assistance, in accordance with Salt Lake City Code 2.20.040. WHEREAS, the Community Recovery Committee evaluated the applications in accordance with Salt Lake City Code Chapter 2.20, including consideration of the applicant's proposed use of funds, geographic equity, the policies and objectives of the community grant program, and the federal requirements pursuant to ARPA. WHEREAS, the Community Recovery Committee has completed review of the applications and has recommended funding allocations as further described in Exhibit A. WHEREAS, pursuant to Salt Lake City Code 2.20.010, the Mayor has reviewed the Community Recovery Committee's recommendations set forth in Exhibit A. WHEREAS,based on the Review Committee's recommendations, the Mayor recommends that the City Council approve the funding allocations as described in Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, that: SECTION 1. Funding Approval. The City Council approves the funding allocations as further described in Exhibit B. The City Council authorizes the Mayor to negotiate and execute the grant agreements and any other relevant documents required, consistent with Exhibit B and Salt Lake City Code Chapter 2.20, and incorporating such other terms and agreements as recommended by the City Attorney's office. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of 52023. Darin Mano, Council Chair ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023. Published: APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date: March 7, 2023 ,�s7a4,e,- �� Sara Montoya, City Xttorney EXHIIBIT A 2022-2024 2022-2024 CRC REQUESTED 2022-2024 ELIGIBLE RECOMMENDATION # BUSINESS APPLICANT DISTRICT FUNDING FUNDING(Proven Loss) (%Based on Score) CATEGORY 1 Junction Dance Company(63480) 5 $50,000.00 $49,000.00 $45,815.00 AB Business provides dance training,two dance companies,creative space and performance opportunities for youth and professional artists. They cultivate an artistically enriching community through performance and outreach. Type of Business: Dance Studio(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Rent,utilities,and operating costs(pay contracted artists) Received other assistance:None 2 Zahara,LLC(62879) 5 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $6,538.00 TTH Moroccan pop-up restaurant,that also offers catering services. Business holds community events that last between 2-3 hours where food is served. Owner plans to re-establish their events,and catering services,along with building to transition to a permanent physical location. Type of Business: Restaurant(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,venue rentals and staff costs. Received other assistance:Business received$2k from the International Rescue Committee for business expenses accrued during COVID-19. 3 Sugar Space,LLC(63372) 1 2 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 $46,250.00 SB Business is an arts,events and reception center. They provide space for artists of all disciplines to create and present work and a place for the community to celebrate,learn,share and engage. Type of Business: Event/Reception Center(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Salaries and wages for staff. Received other assistance:Yes,they received under$50k in other assistance with PPP and EIDL. 41 Dream Garden Press/dba Ken Sanders Rare Books(63434) 1 4 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 1 $46,100.00 AB This business sells used,new,and rare books and ephemera. Special focus for this business is Utah and regional history. This business all supports local artists and musicians with regular public events. Type of Business: Bookstore in the City Center(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent and payroll. Received other assistance:Received approx..$75k of other assistance with PPP and EIDL 5 Zaater and Zayton(62465) 2 $50,000.00 $38,000.00 $34,960.00 TTH Business is a full-service catering company offering a unique blend of traditional Middle Eastern Cuisine and American fusion. Type of Business: Catering Disproportionately Impacted:Women& 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Mortgage payment,operational costs and start-up costs Received other assistance:Yes. Received$20k in EIDL 61 Mestizo,LLC(63831) 3 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $45,900.00 TTH r2„ei' ;o�ff A 1--,', tAA h.,,»,,4—jr—,,,,,,,,,4— Th.f,,, l IF—';-; A onA A t / her; .f t� ,,,,,,,,,,;t.. 2022-2024 2022-2024 CRC REQUESTED 2022-2024 ELIGIBLE RECOMMENDATION # BUSINESS APPLICANT DISTRICT FUNDING FUNDING(Proven Loss) (%Based on Score) CATEGORY .. 1—v..,u.w.x vy w......u. .' — ....,.vws.,.o u y.uv.,..,.v.v..,....�u�..........u.s o..u....�u. .,�..,..�..�.....,.....,.....y. Type of Business: Coffeehouse(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,operating costs and wages. Received other assistance:None 7 Noor AI Sham LLC(63326) 5 $11,000.00 $10,758.00 $9,660.68 SB Catering business looking to complete start up and expand. Type of Business: Food-Catering(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:100%BIPOC Owned Use of funds:Start up costs,rent,payroll and operational expenses. Received other assistance:Received under$3,000 in PPP funding. 8 Susie M's Gallery of Fine Tattooing(63355) 5 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $22,250.00 SB Business provides an art studio with retail space,along with tattooing education space. Type of Business: Tattoo Parlor-Retail Space(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent and payroll. Received other assistance:None 9 J Street Productions(60538) 7 $26,000.00 $25,000.00 $22,107.14 AB Writer who writes novels for young readers(middle grades and young adult). Writes nonfictions on the intersection of art and faith,and also consults freelance writers and provides editorial services for other writers. Type of Business: Writer(Home Based,Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Salary and Operating Expenses(will have to provide tax documents,etc.) Received other assistance:None 10 Arts of the World Gallery(63518) 5 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $44,000.00 AB Business is the local home for global treasures.This business houses traditional(indigenous)arts and crafts and also traditional industries like ceramics in two historic buildings that have been maintained and preserved. Type of Business: Art Gallery(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Utilities,and operating expenses Received other assistance:Yes.Received less than$50k in Salt Lake County grant,and PPP funds 11 Premier Paralegal Solutions,LLC(59841) 1 5 1 $50,000.00 $9,000.00 $7,800.00 SB Business provides legal document preparation,tax preparation and some translation services. Services provided to clients with digital equity issues that require in person attention. Type of Business: Legal Services(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Rent,payroll,supplies and start-up costs. 2022-2024 2022-2024 CRC REQUESTED 2022-2024 ELIGIBLE RECOMMENDATION # BUSINESS APPLICANT DISTRICT FUNDING FUNDING(Proven Loss) (%Based on Score) CATEGORY Received other assistance:Yes,less than$50k in EIDL and PPP 12 Cycling Utah,LLC(63477) 4 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $43,166.67 SB Business produces a bicycling magazine and website. They are in their 30th year of business providing information,news,tips and event calendars. They distribute throughout Salt Lake City and the western United States. Type of Business: Magazine(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Operating costs and payroll. Received other assistance:Yes. Received less than$50k in PPP funds 13 Golden Gyros(63448) 5 $50,000.00 $47,000.00 $40,106.67 TTH Local restaurant in Salt Lake City. One of the first restaurants to close due to COVID-19 trying to keep doors open on their startup business that opened as the pandemic hit. Type of Business: Restaurant Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,wages,and equipment. Received other assistance:None 14 Amie Engberg(62853) 5 $38,000.00 $38,000.00 $32,110.00 SB Document preparation and financial education services for chiropractors. Type of Business: Financial Education Services(Home Based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Supplies and salary Received other assistance:None 15 Six Sailor Cider,LLC(63232) 4 $50,000.00 $11,000.00 $9,218.00 TTH Business makes a variety of flavored apple ciders,non-alcoholic and sparkling hard ciders to be sold in the future. Started their sales in farmer's markets and now expanding into online and retail sales. Type of Business: Brewery(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent,payroll and startup costs. Received other assistance:None 161 Bye Phoebe(59674) 3 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 1 $4,175.00 AB Owner is a model,fashion stylist and also makes custom clothing for production companies. Type of Business: Styli stlClothing(Home Based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women&100%BIPOC owned 2022-2024 2022-2024 CRC REQUESTED 2022-2024 ELIGIBLE RECOMMENDATION # BUSINESS APPLICANT DISTRICT FUNDING FUNDING(Proven Loss) (%Based on Score) CATEGORY Use of funds:Equipment,materials,payroll and startup costs. Received other assistance:Yes received$1,200 from Artist Emergency Fund 17 Sikkim Momo(59832) 1 2 $49,000.00 $3,100.00 $2,583.33 TTH Business is a catering food business. This entrepreneur is from the Spice Kitchen incubator program of the International Rescue Committee. Type of Business: Catering Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies and equipment. Received other assistance:Business received$2k from the International Rescue Committee. 18 Christina's Barber Shop(60332) 1 5 $13,500.00 $14,000.00 $11,596.67 SB Business is a barber shop specializing in gentlemen haircuts located on 300 West. Type of Business: Barber shop(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent,utilities,and operating expenses. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k from EIDL. 19 Flamenco del Lago(63429) 1 5 $50,000.00 $13,000.00 $10,768.33 AB Business is a nonprofit under the direction of Katie Sheen-Abbott she's studied Flamenco for many years. She teaches and performs flamenco in Salt Lake City and throughout Utah for all ages and abilities. Type of Business: Dance teacher(Sole Proprietor&Nonprofit) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent,and equipment costs. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k in EIDL funding. 20 Dayhouse Studio(61894) 7 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $41,333.33 SB Business is a biophilic interior design studio specializing in residential and commercial spaces. Improving health,well-being and sustainable practices are at the heart of their work. Type of Business: Interior Design Studio(Home based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Operating costs and payroll. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k from EIDL. 21 1 Seth Ian Photography(62887) 1 3 $15,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,786.67 AB Photographer for the performing arts,small businesses,and real estate.Business is also undertaking documentary projects. Type of Business: Photographer(home-based&sole proprietor) 2022-2024 2022-2024 CRC REQUESTED 2022-2024 ELIGIBLE RECOMMENDATION # BUSINESS APPLICANT DISTRICT FUNDING FUNDING(Proven Loss) (%Based on Score) CATEGORY Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Equipment upgrades and project development costs Received other assistance:None 22 Worthfull Media,LLC(60612) 3 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $20,625.00 AB Boutique media production house that records,edits,produces,and manages audio and video for small business owners and personal brands.The bulk of business is for podcasters and YouTubers,but includes making related media as well. Type of Business:Media production(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds:Website upgrades,rent,contract costs Received other assistance:PPP and EIDL funds around$5k. 23 IDesign to Grow,LLC(63108) 4 $32,000.00 $32,000.00 $26,133.33 AB Business is a designibuild studio that does in house fabrication focused on public art,teaching/workshops,events,and commercial furniture. Type of Business:Design studio(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent,retaining employees Received other assistance:PPP$8.7K,Small Business Impact Grant$9.9k 24 Suzanne May(60330) 1 7 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $8,033.33 AB Singer/songwriter that also teaches voice and songwriting lessons from home studio. Type of Business:Musician(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds:Tour and equipment costs. Received other assistance:EIDL$12k,Unemployment$8k 25 The Twist(Kirk's Ship,LLC)(60520) 4 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,916.67 TTH Business is a Restaurant,Bar&Nightclub Type of Business:Bar/Restaurant Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Wages,retain employees Received other assistance:PPP&Employee Retention Credit over$50k 26 Elegant Tailoring,LLC(61865) 4 $50,000.00 $21,335.00 $17,025.33 SB Business is a tailoring shop in the heart of downtown. Type of Business:Tailoring Shop(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Payroll and operational expenses. Received other assistance:Business received less than$6,000.00 in PPP funding. EXHIBIT A 2022-2024 2022-2024 CRC REQUESTED 2022-2024 ELIGIBLE RECOMMENDATION # BUSINESS APPLICANT DISTRICT FUNDING FUNDING(Proven Loss) (%Based on Score) CATEGORY 27 Utah Hispanic Chamber of Commerce(62544) 2 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,833.33 SB Chamber of Commerce serving Hispanic businesses. Type of Business:Chamber of Commerce Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Wages Received other assistance:None 28 Utah Fitness Institute(62189) 5 $21,502.00 $22,000.00 $17,526.67 SB Personal training and wellness retreat business. Type of Business:Fitness Studio(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent costs Received other assistance:Salt Lake County grant$22k 29 Match and Farnsworth,PC(62089) 4 $49,000.00 $49,000.00 $38,955.00 SB Business is a small private law firm that provides representation to individuals who are unable to work due to physical or mental disabilities. Type of Business:Law Firm(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds:Payroll Received other assistance:Business received more than$50k from PPP. 30 Antidote Cosmeceuticals,LLC(60991) 6 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $6,304.00 SB Business manufactures bottles and sells skin care products. Type of Business:Skin care(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Facility upgrades and payroll Received other assistance:None 31 First Steps,Inc.(60261) 1 $50,000.00 $12,000.00 $9,140.00 SB Business is a child care center. Type of Business:Daycare Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Facility upgrades and payroll Received other assistance:PPP,EIDL,&CCL Stabilization Grant-over$200k EXHIBIT B SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR PHASE 1 COMMUNITY RECOVERY GRANTS The following funding allocations are approved as provided herein. The 2022-2024 CRC Recommendation has been adjusted to reflect the Community Recovery Committee's recommended funding amount rounded up to the nearest hundredth value. The funding allocations are approved with the condition that no bonus points may be awarded to repeat applicants during Phase 2 of the Community Recovery Grant review process. EXHIBIT B 2022-2024 2022-2024 ELIGIBLE 2022-2024 CRC REQUESTED FUNDING RECOMMENDATION # BUSINESS APPLICANT DISTRICT FUNDING (Proven Loss) (%Based on Score) CATEGORY 1 IJunction Dance Company(63480) 5 $50,000.00 1 $49,000.00 $45,900.00 AB Business provides dance training,two dance companies,creative space and performance opportunities for youth and professional artists. They cultivate an artistically enriching community through performance and outreach. Type of Business: Dance Studio(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Rent,utilities,and operating costs(pay contracted artists) Received other assistance:None 2 Zahara,LLC(62879) 5 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $6,600.00 TTH Moroccan pop-up restaurant,that also offers catering services. Business holds community events that last between 2-3 hours where food is served. Owner plans to re-establish their events,and catering services,along with building to transition to a permanent physical location. Type of Business: Restaurant(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,venue rentals and staff costs. Received other assistance:Business received$2k from the International Rescue Committee for business expenses accrued during COVID-19. 3 Sugar Space,LLC(63372) 1 2 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 1 $46,300.00 SB Business is an arts,events and reception center. They provide space for artists of all disciplines to create and present work and a place for the community to celebrate, learn,share and engage. Type of Business: Event/Reception Center(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Salaries and wages for staff. Received other assistance:Yes,they received under$50k in other assistance with PPP and EIDL. 4 Dream Garden Press/dba Ken Sanders Rare Books(63434) 1 4 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 $46,100.00 AB This business sells used,new,and rare books and ephemera. Special focus for this business is Utah and regional history. This business all supports local artists and musicians with regular public events. Type of Business: Bookstore in the City Center(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent and payroll. Received other assistance:Received approx..$75k of other assistance with PPP and EIDL 5 1 Zaater and Zayton(62465) 1 2 1 $50,000.00 1 $38,000.00 1 $35,000.00 TTH Business is a full-service catering company offering a unique blend of traditional Middle Eastern Cuisine and American fusion. Type of Business: Catering Disproportionately Impacted:Women& 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Mortgage payment,operational costs and start-up costs Received other assistance:Yes. Received$20k in EIDL 6 Mestizo,LLC(63831) 1 3 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 $45,900.00 TTH Business is a coffee house created by community for community. The founders envisioned a place for civic engagement and sharing art to strengthen community. Type of Business: Coffeehouse(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,operating costs and wages. Received other assistance:None 7 Noor Al Sham LLC(63326) 5 $11,000.00 $10,758.00 $9,700.00 SB Catering business looking to complete start up and expand. Type of Business: Food-Catering(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC Owned Use of funds:Start up costs,rent,payroll and operational expenses. Received other assistance:Received under$3,000 in PPP funding. 8 Susie M's Gallery of Fine Tattooing(63355) 5 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $22,300.00 SB Business provides an art studio with retail space,along with tattooing education space. Type of Business: Tattoo Parlor-Retail Space(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent and payroll. Received other assistance:None 9 J Street Productions(60538) 1 7 1 $26,000.00 $25,000.00 $22,200.00 1 AB Writer who writes novels for young readers(middle grades and young adult). Writes nonfictions on the intersection of art and faith,and also consults freelance writers and provides editorial services for other writers. Type of Business: Writer(Home Based,Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Salary and Operating Expenses(will have to provide tax documents,etc.) Received other assistance:None 10 Arts of the World Gallery(63518) 1 5 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 1 $44,000.00 1 AB Business is the local home for global treasures.This business houses traditional(indigenous)arts and crafts and also traditional industries like ceramics in two historic buildings that have been maintained and preserved. Type of Business: Art Gallery(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Utilities,and operating expenses Received other assistance:Yes.Received less than$50k in Salt Lake County grant,and PPP funds I Premier Paralegal Solutions,LLC(59841) 1 5 1 $50,000.00 $9,000.00 $7,800.00 SB Business provides legal document preparation,tax preparation and some translation services. Services provided to clients with digital equity issues that require in person attention. Type of Business: Legal Services(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Rent,payroll,supplies and start-up costs. Received other assistance:Yes,less than$50k in BIDE and PPP 12 Cycling Utah,LLC(63477) 4 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 $43,200.00 SB Business produces a bicycling magazine and website. They are in their 30th year of business providing information,news,rips and event calendars. They distribute throughout Salt Lake City and the western United States. Type of Business: Magazine(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Operating costs and payroll. Received other assistance:Yes. Received less than$50k in PPP funds 13 Golden Gyros(63448) 1 5 $50,000.00 1 $47,000.00 $40,200.00 TTH Local restaurant in Salt Lake City. One of the first restaurants to close due to COVID-19 trying to keep doors open on their start up business that opened as the pandemic hit. Type of Business: Restaurant Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,wages,and equipment. Received other assistance:None 14 Amie Engberg(62853) 5 $38,000.00 $38,000.00 $32,200.00 SB Document preparation and financial education services for chiropractors. Type of Business: Financial Education Services(Home Based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Supplies and salary Received other assistance:None 15 1 Six Sailor Cider,LLC(63232) 1 4 1 $50,000.00 1 $11,000.00 1 $9,300.00 1 TTH Business makes a variety of flavored apple ciders,non-alcoholic and sparkling hard ciders to be sold in the future. Started their sales in farmer's markets and now expanding into online and retail sales. Type of Business: Brewery(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent,payroll and startup costs. Received other assistance:None 16 Bye Phoebe(59674) 3 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,200.00 AB Owner is a model,fashion stylist and also makes custom clothing for production companies. Type of Business: Stylist/Clothing(Home Based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women&100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Equipment,materials,payroll and startup costs. Received other assistance:Yes received$1,200 from Artist Emergency Fund 17 Sikkim Momo(59832) 1 2 $49,000.00 $3,100.00 $2,600.00 TTH Business is a catering food business. This entrepreneur is from the Spice Kitchen incubator program of the International Rescue Committee. Type of Business: Catering Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies and equipment. Received other assistance:Business received$2k from the International Rescue Committee. 18 Christina's Barber Shop(60332) 1 5 $13,500.00 $14,000.00 $11,600.00 SB Business is a barber shop specializing in gentlemen haircuts located on 300 West. Type of Business: Barber shop(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent,utilities,and operating expenses. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k from EIDL. 19 Flamenco del Lago(63429) 1 5 $50,000.00 $13,000.00 $10,800.00 AB Business is a nonprofit under the direction of Katie Sheen-Abbott she's studied Flamenco for many years. She teaches and performs flamenco in Salt Lake City and throughout Utah for all ages and abilities. Type of Business: Dance teacher(Sole Proprietor&Nonprofit) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent,and equipment costs. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k in EIDL funding. 20 Dayhouse Studio(61894) 1 7 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 1 $41,400.00 1 SB Business is a biophilic interior design studio specializing in residential and commercial spaces. Improving health,well-being and sustainable practices are at the heart of their work. Type of Business: Interior Design Studio(Home based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Operating costs and payroll. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k from EIDL. 21 ISeth Ian Photography(62887) 1 3 $15,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,800.00 AB Photographer for the performing arts,small businesses,and real estate.Business is also undertaking documentary projects. Type of Business: Photographer(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Equipment upgrades and project development costs Received other assistance:None 22 Worthfull Media,LLC(60612) 3 $25,000.00 1 $25,000.00 $20,700.00 AB Boutique media production house that records,edits,produces,and manages audio and video for small business owners and personal brands.The bulk of business is for podcasters and YouTubers,but includes making related media as well. Type of Business:Media production(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds:Website upgrades,rent,contract costs Received other assistance:PPP and EIDL funds around$5k. 23 iDesign to Grow,LLC(63108) 77J 4 $32,000.00 1 $32,000.00 $26,200.00 AB Business is a designibuild studio that does in house fabrication focused on public art,teaching/workshops,events,and commercial furniture. Type of Business:Design studio(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent,retaining employees Received other assistance:PPP$8.7K,Small Business Impact Grant$9.9k 24 Suzanne May(60330) 1 7 $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 $8,100.00 AB Singer/songwriter that also teaches voice and songwriting lessons from home studio. Type of Business:Musician(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds:Tour and equipment costs. Received other assistance:EIDL$12k,Unemployment$8k 25 1 The Twist(Kirk's Ship,LLC)(60520) 4 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $40,000.00 TTH Business is a Restaurant,Bar&Nightclub Type of Business:Bar/Restaurant Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Wages,retain employees Received other assistance:PPP&Employee Retention Credit over$50k 26 Elegant Tailoring,LLC(61865) 4 $50,000.00 $21,335.00 $17,100.00 SB Business is a tailoring shop in the heart of downtown. Type of Business:Tailoring Shop(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Payroll and operational expenses. Received other assistance:Business received less than$6,000.00 in PPP funding. 27 Utah Hispanic Chamber of Commerce(62544) 2 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,900.00 SB Chamber of Commerce serving Hispanic businesses. Type of Business:Chamber of Commerce Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Wages Received other assistance:None 28 Utah Fitness Institute(62189) 5 $21,502.00 $22,000.00 $17,600.00 SB Personal training and wellness retreat business. Type of Business:Fitness Studio(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent costs Received other assistance:Salt Lake County grant$22k 29 Match and Farnsworth,PC(62089) 4 $49,000.00 $49,000.00 $39,000.00 SB Business is a small private law firm that provides representation to individuals who are unable to work due to physical or mental disabilities. Type of Business:Law Firm(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds:Payroll Received other assistance:Business received more than$50k from PPP. 30 Antidote Cosmeceuticals,LLC(60991) 6 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $6,400.00 SB Business manufactures bottles and sells skin care products. Type of Business:Skin care(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Facility upgrades and payroll Received other assistance:None 31 lFirst Steps,Inc.(60261) 1 $50,000.00 $12,000.00 $9,200.00 SB Business is a child care center. Type of Business:Daycare Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Facility upgrades and payroll Received other assistance:PPP,EIDL,&CCL Stabilization Grant-over$200k 32 CathPro Technologies(62544) 1 7 $28,000.00 $28,000.00 $22,300.00 SB Business owns intellectual property and is associated with technology platforms in the medical device sector. Type of Business: R&D Medical Devices Disproportionately Impacted:BIPOC Use of funds:Rent,start up,operating expenses Received other assistance:EIDL,Small Business Catalyst Grant-less than$50k 33 10skar&Julia Music LLC(59713) 3 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $8,000.00 AB Musicians who record,perform and sell merchandise. Type of Business: Recording Music Disproportionately Impacted: None Use of funds:Operating expenses,supplies. Received other assistance:None 34 Mago LLC dba Diggity Dog Resort(61569) 2 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,500.00 SB Dog boarding and daycare facility. Type of Business: Dog care resort Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds: Wages Received other assistance: Received PPP-over$50k 35 Namash Swahili Cuisine(63291) 2 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $7,900.00 TTH African cuisine food truck which sells authentic food from Africa using unique family recipes. Type of Business: Food Truck Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds: Equipment and operating expenses Received other assistance: Spice Kitchen-$2k 36 Salt Lake Capoeira&Brazilian Jiu Jitsu(61693) 7 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,500.00 AB Afro-Brazilian Capoeira and Brazilian Jiu Jitsu education and performance business. Type of Business: Capoeira&Brazilian Jiu Jitsu Education Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Operating expenses Received other assistance: EIDL,Artists Emergency Funds,SLC Chamber Grant,PPP-less than$50k 37 Kate Mamai LLC(60765) 2 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,200.00 TTH Catering and food truck business. Type of Business: Catering and Food Truck Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds: Operating costs Received other assistance: SBA-under$50k 38 Total Body Pilates(63317) 6 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $15,700.00 SB Salt Lake City business since 1999,teaching pilates and physical wellness. Type of Business: Pilates studio Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds: Rent and utilities Received other assistance: None 39 Tippetts Builders LLC(63559) 4 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $6,300.00 SB General contractor residential construction. Type of Business: Construction Disproportionately Impacted: None Use of funds: Operating expenses and equipment Received other assistance: None 40 Les Madeleines LLC(63537) 1 4 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 $39,100.00 TTH French pastry shop that has been part of the downtown community since 2003. Also an e-commerce shop since 2008. Type of Business: Pastry Shop Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds: Wages,rent and operating expenses Received other assistance: Received PPP-over$50k 41 Halab's Jasmine Kitchen(61158) 2 $6,050.00 $6,050.00 $4,800.00 TTH Food truck that offers Syrian and Eastern Mediterranean cuisine throughout Salt Lake City. Type of Business: Food truck Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds: Operating expenses Received other assistance: Spice Kitchen grant,Neighborworks grant-less than$50k 42 Utah Brewers Guild(63442) 1 4 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,000.00 SB Business supports Utah craft brewing manufacturers and small businesses with direct programming,education and advocacy. Type of Business:Business alliance Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Wages and operating costs Received other assistance:EIDL-$19,000 ER IN III:NI7I;NI AI;I, LORLNARIFF0JFNSON MAYOR ,„1WTwt ` 1)I;PAR"I'11I,N'1'tu I;C'ON011ICDI'VELOPIIFNT CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 02/03/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 02/03/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 3, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Lorena Riffo Jenson, Director, Department of Economic Development SUBJECT: ARPA Community Grant Program Funds-Phase One Distribution-Community Recovery Committee (CRC) Recommendation for Distribution STAFF CONTACTS: Cathie Rigby,ARPA Program Manager, Cathie.Riy �slc�ov.com Todd Andersen,ARPA Project Coordinator, Todd.Andersen(O`slc,,ov.coin DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Review and Approve the$755,71$disbursement ofAmerican Rescue Plan Act(ARPA)Community Grant Program Funds for Phase 1. BUDGET IMPACT: Distribution of$755,71$ of the $2 million ARPA funding allocated in FY22, BA5. COORDINATION: Community and Neighborhoods (CAN), Mayor's Office, SLC Finance Department, and other outside organizations. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On March 11, 2021,the U.S. Government signed into law, a COVID-19 recovery bill, the American Rescue Plan Act("ARPA"). ARPA was intended to support State and Local recovery from the COVID-19 public health emergency("COVID-19 Pandemic") or the negative economic impacts experienced as a result of the pandemic. The U.S. Department of the Treasury released materials associated with the release of funds to Cities and States,known as the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ("SLFRF") Salt Lake City received approximately$85.4 million in federal funding,which must be committed by December 31, 2024 and spent by December 31, 2026. After extensive community engagement,the Mayor and City Council approved the creation of the Community Grant Program to help small businesses and nonprofits recover from the negative economic impacts of the pandemic. In April of 2022, Salt Lake City code 2.20.04o established the Community Grant Program to be administered by both The Department of Economic Development ("DED") and Community and Neighborhoods ("CAN"). Both departments were tasked with deploying $2M each of the $85.4 million federal funds granted to the City. Below is an overview of the policies and objectives for these funds that guided the program and application process. Program Overview • No single application for a community grant will exceed $1oo,000.00 • Any application for a community grant to a nonprofit organization will focus on supporting communities disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including,but not limited to, offering services to retrain displaced workers: providing legal or other assistance for evictions or rent relief: expanding educational opportunities; deploying resources to mitigate the digital divide; supporting parents or children affected by COVID-19 including childcare or after school program; and providing access to healthcare services,including mental health support. • Any application for a community grant for a local business will focus on supporting the business's operation or employees who have been economically affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. To aid in the process and establish criteria quickly,transparently, and fairly deploy the fund's City Council created the Community Recovery Committee ("CRC")to oversee the process, review the applications and make recommendations for the deployment of funds. The committee is comprised of seven(7) members that serve on the following other boards: Economic Development Loan Fund Racial Equity in Policing(2 members from this board) Human Rights Commission (2 members from this board) Salt Lake Arts Council Business Advisory Board Qualifying Use of Funds To meet the qualifying criteria established by the Department of Treasury and to align our grants with SLFRF expenditure categories DED staff categorized applications into one of the four categories below: • Small business economic assistance • Aid to Tourism,Travel or Hospitality • Aid to Arts and Artisan businesses • Aid to Nonprofit organizations with programming specific to small businesses or arts and artisan businesses. All four of these expenditure categories are small business-related, eligible for funding through the Community Grant Program and aid Salt Lake City's Department of Finance ("Finance")to administer the program. The application process is set up in two phases. Phase 1 was open from September 1st through 30th, 2022 and Phase 2 will begin sometime in March 2023. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion To ensure the grant program is available to all potential applicants, DED has instituted the following measures to ensure the program is equitable,transparent, and inclusive: • Application materials,training videos, and presentations are provided in multiple languages. • Online and paper applications are accepted. • Training and Technical Assistance appointments are offered on both the East and West sides of Salt Lake City. • Individual application assistance is provided by DED,The International Rescue Committee, and SBDC as needed. In Phase 1 a total of 296 applications were received, and of those 157 were eligible for further review in the small business category,and 40 were eligible for review as a qualifying nonprofit. The information below shows additional demographic data of the applications reviewed by the committee: • 45 applicants were from a business that identified as I00% Female owned business. • 51 applicants were from a business which identified as I00% owned by a member of the BIPOC community • 61 applicants listed themselves as an arts business • 55 applicants listed themselves as a small business • 77 applicants were from the travel,tourism, or hospitality sector • 4o applicants are from the nonprofit community(applications to be reviewed in the next phase of funding) Applications were reviewed by staff, including a member of the Finance Department, and sorted into lists of 15-20 to be presented for review and scoring by the members of the CRC during its weekly meetings. Scoring Applicants were eligible for too base points with the following breakdown: • 6o% of the points are based on narratives the businesses provided sharing how COVID-19 impacted their business(past,present, and future) • 30% of points are based on how a business was able to navigate through the pandemic. • Io% of the points are based on if the applicant takes advantage of the technical assistance offered to prepare applicants to submit their application, understand the questions, and have a review of their narratives. In addition to the base points, staff awarded up to 7o bonus points to impacted and disproportionately impacted communities including: • 100%Minority Owned Business (15 points) • 100% Female-Owned Business (15 points) • Artist-Artisan Business(15 points) • Business located in Qualified Census Tract location(QCT) (15 points) • Business in the Travel,Tourism, &Hospitality sector(5 points) • Business in the City Center(5 points) A total of 10 meetings were held in phase 1 to allow the CRC members to review applications, submit scoring, make recommendations about the process, and ask questions. Attached to this transmittal, you will find The Community Recovery Committee's list of recommended businesses applications for approval by the City Council. Attachments: • List of Recommended Businesses for Grant Approval • Ordinance • Letter from the Community Recovery Committee 2022-2024 2022-2024 2022-2024 CRC REQUESTED ELIGIBLE FUNDING RECOMMENDATION(% BUSINESS APPLICANT DISTRICT FUNDING (Proven Loss) Based on Score) CATEGORY 1 I Junction Dance Company(63480) 5 $50,000.00 $49,000.00 $45,815.00 1 AB Business provides dance training,two dance companies,creative space and performance opportunities for youth and professional artists. They cultivate an artistically enriching community thorugh performance and outreach. Type of Business: Dance Studio(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Rent,utilities,and operating costs(pay contracted artists) Received other assistance:None 2 Zahara,LLC(62879) 5 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $6,538.00 TTH Moroccan pop-up restaurant,that also offers catering services. Business holds community events that last between 2-3 hours where food is served. Owner plans to re-establish their events, and catering services,along with building to transition to a permanent physical location. Type of Business: Restaurant(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,venue rentals and staff costs. Received other assistance:Business received$2k from the Internation Rescue Committee for business expenses accrued during COVID-19. 3 Sugar Space,LLC(63372) 1 2 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 $46,250.00 SB Business is an arts,events and reception center. They provide space for artists of all disciplines to create and present work and a place for the community to celebrate,learn,share and engage. Type of Business: Event/Reception Center(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Salaries and wages for staff. Received other assistance:Yes,they received under$50k in other assistance with PPP and EIDL. 4 Dream Garden Press/dba Ken Sanders Rare Books(63434) 1 4 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $46,100.00 AB This business sells used,new,and rare books and ephemera. Special focus for this business is Utah and regional history. This business all supports local artista and musicians with regular public events. Type of Business: Bookstore in the City Center(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent and payroll. Received other assistance:Received aprox.$75k of other assistance with PPPand EIDL 5 Zaater and Zayton(62465) 2 $50,000.00 $38,000.00 $34,960.00 TTH Business is a full-service catering company offering a unique blend of traditional Middle Eastern Cuisine and American fusion. Type of Business: Catering Disproportionately Impacted:Women&100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Mortgage payment,operational costs and start-up costs Received other assistance:Yes. Received$20k in EIDL 6 Mestizo,LLC(63831) 3 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $45,900.00 TTH Business is a coffee house created by community for community. The founders envisioned a place for civic engagement and sharing art to strengthen community. Type of Business: Coffeehouse(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,operating costs and wages. Received other assistance:None 7 Noor Al Sham LLC(63326) 5 $11,000.00 $10,758.00 $9,660.68 SB Catering business looking to complete start up and expand. Type of Business: Food-Catering(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC Owned Use of funds:Start up costs,rent,payroll and operational expenses. Received other assistance:Received under$3,000 in PPP funding. 8 Susie M's Gallery of Fine Tattooing(63355) 5 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $22,250.00 SB Business provides an art studio with retail space,along with tattooing education space. Type of Business: Tattoo Parlor-Retail Space(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent and payroll. Received other assistance:None 9 3 Street Productions(60538) 7 $26,000.00 $25,000.00 $22,107.14 AB Writer who writes novels for young readers(middle grades and young adult). Writes nonfictions on the intersection of art and faith,and also consults freelance writers and provides editorial services for other writers. Type of Business: Writer(Home Based,Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Salary and Operating Expenses(will have to provide tax documents,etc.) Received other assistance:None 10 Arts of the World Gallery(63518) 5 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $44,000.00 AB Business is the local home for global treasures.This business houses traditional(indigenous)arts and crafts and also traditional industries like ceramics in two historic buildings that have been maintained and preserved. Type of Business: Art Gallery(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Utilities,and operating expenses Received other assistance:Yes.Received less than$50k in Salt Lake County grant,and PPP funds III Premier Paralegal Solutions,LLC(59841) 1 5 1 $50,000.00 $9,000.00 $7,800.00 SB Business provides legal document preparation,tax preparation and some translation services. Services provided to clients with digital equity issues that require in person attention. Type of Business: Legal Services(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Rent,payroll,supplies and start-up costs. Received other assistance:Yes,less than$50k in EIDL and PPP 12 1 Cycling Utah,LLC(63477) 4 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $43,166.67 SB Business produces a bicycling magazine and website. They are in their 30th year of business providing information,news,tips and event calendars. They distribute throughout Salt Lake City and the western United States. Type of Business: Magazine(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Operating costs and payroll. Received other assistance:Yes. Received less thatn$50k in PPP funds 13 Golden Gyros(63448) 5 $50,000.00 $47,000.00 $40,106.67 TTH Local restaurant in Salt Lake City. One of the first restaurants to close due to COVID-19 trying to keep doors open on their startup business that opened as the pandemic hit. Type of Business: Restaurant Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,wages,and equipment. Received other assistance:None 14 Amie Engberg(62853) 5 $38,000.00 $38,000.00 $32,110.00 SB Document preparation and financial education services for chiropractors. Type of Business: Financial Education Services(Home Based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Supplies and salary Received other assistance:None 15 Six Sailor Cider,LLC(63232) 4 $50,000.00 $11,000.00 $9,218.00 TTH Business makes a variety of flavored apple ciders,non-alcoholic and sparkling hard ciders to be sold in the future. Started their sales in farmer's markets and now expanding into online and retail sales. Type of Business: Brewery(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent,payroll and startup costs. Received other assistance:None 16 Bye Phoebe(59674) 3 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,175.00 AB Owner is a model,fashion stylist and also makes custom clothing for production companies. Type of Business: Stylist/Clothing(Home Based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women& 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Equipment,materials,payroll and startup costs. Received other assistance:Yes received$1,200 from Artist Emergency Fund 17 Sikkim Momo(59832) 1 2 $49,000.00 $3,100.00 $2,583.33 TTH Business is a catering food business. This entrepreneur is from the Spice Kitchen incubator program of the International Rescue Committee. Type of Business: Catering Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies and equipment. Received other assistance:Business received$2k from the Internation Rescue Committee. 18 I Christina's Barber Shop(60332) 5 $13,500.00 $14,000.00 $11,596.67 SB Business is a barber shop specializing in gentlemen haircuts located on 300 West. Type of Business: Barber shop(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent,utilities,and operating expenses. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k from EIDL. 19 Flamenco del Lago(63429) 5 $50,000.00 $13,000.00 $10,768.33 AB Business is a nonprofit under the direction of Katie Sheen-Abbott she's studied Flamenco for many years. She teaches and performs flamenco in Salt Lake City and throughout Utah for all ages and abilities. Type of Business: Dance teacher(Sole Proprietor&Nonprofit) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent,and equpment costs. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k in EIDL funding. 20 Dayhouse Studio(61894) 1 7 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $41,333.33 SB Business is a biophilic interior design studio specializing in residential and commercial spaces. Improving health,well-being and sustainable practices are at the heart of their work. Type of Business: Interior Design Studio(Home based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Operating costs and payroll. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k from EIDL. 21 Seth Ian Photography(62887) 1 3 $15,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,786.67 AB Photographer for the performing arts,small businesses,and real estate.Business is also undertaking documentary projects. Type of Business: Photographer(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Equipment upgrades and project development costs Received other assistance:None 22 Worthfull Media,LLC(60612) 3 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $20,625.00 AB Boutique media production house that records,edits,produces,and manages audio and video for small business owners and personal brands.The bulk of business is for podcasters and YouTubers,but includes making related media as well. Type of Business:Media production(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds:Website upgrades,rent,contract costs Received other assistance:PPP and EIDL funds around$5k. 23 Design to Grow,LLC(63108) 4 $32,000.00 $32,000.00 $26,133.33 AB Business is a designibuild studio that does in house fabrication focused on public art,teaching/workshops,events,and commercial furniture. Type of Business:Design studio(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent,retaining employees Received other assistance:PPP$8.7K,Small Business Impact Grant$9.9k 24 1 Suzanne May(60330) 1 7 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $8,033.33 AB Singer/songwriter that also teaches voice and songwriting lessons from home studio. Type of Business:Musician(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds:Tour and equipment costs. Received other assistance:EIDL$12k,Unemployment$8k 25 The Twist(Kirk's Ship,LLC)(60520) 4 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,916.67 TTH Busines is a Restaurant,Bar&Nightclub Type of Business:Bar/Restaurant Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Wages,retain employees Received other assistance:PPP&Employee Rention Credit over$50k 26 Elegant Tailoring,LLC(61865) 4 $50,000.00 $21,335.00 $17,025.33 SB Business is a tailoring shop in the heart of downtown. Type of Business:Tailoring Shop(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Payroll and operational expenses. Received other assistance:Business received less than$6,000.00 in PPP funding. 27 Utah Hispanic Chamber of Commerce(62544) 2 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,833.33 SB Chamber of Commerce serving Hispanic businesses. Type of Business:Chamber of Commerce Disproportionately Impacted: 100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Wages 28 1 Utah Fitness Institute(62189) 5 $21,502.00 $22,000.00 $17,526.67 SB Personal training and wellness retreat business. Type of Business:Fitness Studio(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent costs Received other assistance:Salt Lake County grant$22k 29 Match and Farnsworth,PC(62089) 4 $49,000.00 $49,000.00 $38,955.00 SB Business is a small private law firm that provides representation to individuals who are unable to work due to physical or mental disabilities. Type of Business:Law Firm(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted: 100%female owned Use of funds:Payroll Received other assistance:Business received more than$50k from PPP. 30 Antidote Cosmeceuticals,LLC(60991) 6 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $6,304.00 SB Business manufactures bottles and sells skin care products. Type of Business:Skin care(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Facility upgrades and payroll Received other assistance:PPP,EIDL,&CCL Stabilization Grant-over$200k 31 First Steps,Inc.(60261) 1 $50,000.00 $12,000.00 $9,140.00 SB Business is a child care center. Type of Business:Daycare Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Facility upgrades and payroll Received other assistance:PPP,EIDL,&CCL Stabilization Grant-over$200k SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Ordinance approving the disbursement of American Rescue Plan Act Community Grant Program Funds for Phase 1) WHEREAS, the global COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the world and local economy at an unprecedented level, and Salt Lake City's nonprofit organizations, local businesses, and residents have been negatively impacted by the economic uncertainty caused by the pandemic. WHEREAS, on March 11, 2021, the U.S. Government signed into law a COVID-19 recovery bill, the American Rescue Plan Act("ARPA") and allocated federal funding to Salt Lake City Corporation("City")to use for certain COVID-related uses, including to support disproportionately impacted communities and to mitigate negative economic impacts within the community. WHEREAS, on April 19, 2022, the City Council passed Salt Lake City Ordinance 17 of 2022 , enacting Salt Lake City Code Chapter 2.20 and establishing a new community grant program govern the distribution of certain ARPA funds, including the creation of the Community Recovery Committee tasked with reviewing grant applications and making recommendations on the disbursement of community recovery grant funds. WHEREAS, beginning in November 2022 and continuing through January 2023, the Community Recovery Committee held ten meetings to review and consider applications from approximately 157 small businesses and 39 nonprofit organizations seeking grant funding for direct economic assistance, in accordance with Salt Lake City Code 2.20.040. WHEREAS, the Community Recovery Committee evaluated the applications in accordance with Salt Lake City Code Chapter 2.20, including considering the applicant's proposed use of funds, geographic equity, the policies and objectives of the community grant program, and the federal requirements pursuant to ARPA. WHEREAS, the Community Recovery Committee has completed review of the applications and has recommended funding allocations as further described in Exhibit A. WHEREAS,pursuant to Salt Lake City Code 2.20.010, the Mayor has reviewed the Community Recovery Committee's recommendations set forth in Exhibit A. WHEREAS, based on the Review Committee's recommendations, the Mayor recommends that the City Council approve the funding allocations as described in Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, that: SECTION 1. Funding Approval. The City Council approves the funding allocations as further described in Exhibit B. The City Council authorizes the Mayor to negotiate and execute the grant agreements and any other relevant documents required, consistent with Exhibit B and Salt Lake City Code Chapter 2.20, and incorporating such other terms and agreements as recommended by the City Attorney's office. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of 2023. Darin Mano, Council Chair ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023. Published: APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date: February 3, 2023 Sara Montoya, City Attorney EXHIBIT A 2022-2024 2022-2024 2022-2024 CRC REQUESTED ELIGIBLE FUNDING RECOMMENDATION BUSINESS APPLICANT DISTRICT FUNDING Proven Loss) (%Based on Score) CATEGORY l IJunction Dance Company(63480) 5 $50,000.00 $49,000.00 $45,815.00 AB Business provides dance training,two dance companies,creative space and performance opportunities for youth and professional artists. They cultivate an artistically enriching community thorugh performance and outreach. Type of Business: Dance Studio(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Rent,utilities,and operating costs(pay contracted artists) Received other assistance:None 2 Zahara,LLC(62879) 5 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $6,538.00 TTH Moroccan pop-up restaurant,that also offers catering services. Business holds community events that last between 2-3 hours where food is served. Owner plans to re-establisb their events, and catering services,along with building to transition to a permanent physical location. Type of Business: Restaurant(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,venue rentals and staff costs. Received other assistance:Business received$2k from the Internation Rescue Committee for business expenses accrued during COVID-19. 3 Sugar Space,LLC 63372 2 1 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 $46,250.00 SB Business is an arts,events and reception center. They provide space for artists of all disciplines to create and present work and a place for the community to celebrate,learn,share and engage. Type of Business: Event/Reception Center(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Salaries and wages for staff. Received other assistance:Yes,they received under$50k in other assistance with PPP and EIDL. 4 Dream Garden Press/dba Ken Sanders Rare Books 63434 4 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $46,100.00 AB This business sells used,new,and rare books and ephemera. Special focus for this business is Utah and regional history. This business all supports local artism and musicians with regular public events. Type of Business: Bookstore in the City Center(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent and payroll. Received other assistance:Received aprox.$75k of other assistance with PPPand EIDL 5 Zaater and Za•ton 62465) 2 $50,000.00 $38,000.00 $34,960.00 TTH Business is a full-service catering company offering a unique blend of traditional Middle Eastern Cuisine and American fusion. Type of Business: Catering Disproportionately Impacted:Women&100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Mortgage payment,operational costs and start-up costs Received other assistance:Yes. Received$20k in EIDL 6 Mestizo,LLC 63831 3 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $45,900.00 TTH Business is a coffee house created by community for community. The founders envisioned a place for civic engagement and sharing art to strengthen community. Type of Business: Coffeehouse(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,operating costs and wages. Received other assistance:None 7NoorAl Sham LLC 63326 5 1 $11,000.00 $10,758.00 $9,660.68 SB Catering business looking to complete start up and expand. Type of Business: Food-Catering(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:100%BIPOC Owned Use of funds:Start up costs,rent,payroll and operational expenses. Received other assistance:Received under$3,000 in PPP funding. 8 Susie M's Gallery of Fine Tattooing 63355 5 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $22,250.00 SB Business provides an art studio with retail space,along with tattooing education space. Type of Business: Tattoo Parlor-Retail Space(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent and payroll. Received other assistance:None 91.1 Street Productions 60538 7 $26,000.00 $25,000.00 $22,107.14 AB Writer who writes novels for young readers(middle grades and young adult). Writes nonfiction on the intersection of art and faith,and also consults freelance writers and provides editorial services for other writers. Type of Business: Writer(Home Based,Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Salary and Operating Expenses(will have to provide tax documents,etc.) Received other assistance:None 10 Arts of the World Gallery(63518) 5 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $44,000.00 AB Business is the Local home for global treasures.This business houses traditional(indigenous)arts and crafts and also traditional industries like ceramics in two historic buildings that have been uauuau�ci.auu P111 v .. Type of Business: Art Gallery(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women Owned Use of funds:Utilities,and operating expenses Received other assistance:Yes.Received less than$50k in Salt Lake County grant,and PPP funds 11 Premier Paralegal Solutions,LLC 59841 5 1 $50,000.00 $9,000.00 $7,800.00 SB Business provides legal document preparation,tax preparation and some translation services. Services provided to clients with digital equity issues that require in person attention. Type of Business: Legal Services(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Rent,payroll,supplies and start-up costs. Received other assistance:Yes,less than$50k in EIDL and PPP 12 Cycling Utah,LLC 63477 4 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $43,166.67 SB Business produces a bicycling magazine and websitc. They are in their 30th year of business providing information,news,tips and event calendars. They distribute throughout Salt Lake City and the western United States. Type of Business: Magazine(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Operating costs and payroll. Received other assistance:Yes. Received less them$50k in PPP funds 13 Golden Gyros 63448) 1 5 $50,000.00 $47,000.00 $40,106.67 TTH Local restaurant in Salt Lake City. One of the first restaurants to close due to COVID-19 trying to keep doors open on their startup business that opened as the pandemic hit. Type of Business: Restaurant Disproportionately Impacted:100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies,wages,and equipment. Received other assistance:None 14 AmieEn ber 62853 5 1 $38,000.00 1 $38,000.00 1 $32,110.00 SB Document preparation and financial education services for chiropractors. Type of Business: Financial Education Services(Home Based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Supplies and salary Received other assistance:None 15 Six Sailor Cider,LLC 63232) 4 $50,000.00 $11,000.00 $9,218.00 TTH Business makes a variety of flavored apple ciders,non-alcoholic and sparkling hard ciders to be sold in the future. Started their sales in farmer's markets and now expanding into online and retail sales. Type of Business: Brewery(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent,payroll and startup costs. Received other assistance:None 16 Bve Phoebe(59674) 1 3 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 $4,175.00 AB Owner is a model,fashion stylist and also makes custom clothing for production companies. Type of Business: Stylist/Clothing(Home Based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women&100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Equipment,materials,payroll and startup costs. Received other assistance:Yes received$1,200 from Artist Emergency Fund 17 Sikkim Moran(59832) 1 2 $49,000.00 $3,100,00 $2,583.33 TTH Business is a catering food business. This entrepreneur is from the Spice Kitchen incubator program of the International Rescue Committee. Type of Business: Catering Disproportionately Impacted:100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Purchase of supplies and equipment. Received other assistance:Business received$2k from the Internation Rescue Committee. 18 Christina's Barber Shop 60332 5 $13,500.00 $14,000.00 $11,596.67 SB Business is a barber shop specializing in gentlemen haircuts located on 300 West. Type of Business: Barber shop(Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent,utilities,and operating expenses. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k from EIDL. 19 Flamenco del Lao(63429) 1 5 $50,000.00 1 $13,000.00 $10,768.33 AB Business is a nonprofit under the direction of Katie Sheen-Abbott she's studied Flamenco for many years. She teaches and performs flamenco in Salt Lake City and throughout Utah for all ages and abilities. Type of Business: Dance teacher(Sole Proprietor&Nonprofit) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Rent,and equpment costs. Received other assistance:Business received less than$50k in EIDL funding. 201 Da house Studio 61894) 7 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $41,333.33 SB Business is a biophilic interior design studio specializing in residential and commercial spaces. Improving health,well-being and sustainable practices are at the heart of their work. Type of Business: Interior Design Studio(Home based&Sole Proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:Women owned Use of funds:Operating costs and payroll. Received other assistance:Business received less than S50k from EIDL. 211 Seth Ian Photography(62887) 1 3 $15,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,786.67 AB Photographer for the performing arts,small businesses,and real estate.Business is also undertaking documentary projects. Type of Business: Photographer(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Equipment upgrades and project development costs Received other assistance:None 22 Worthfull Media,LLC(60612) 3 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $20,625.00 AB Boutique media production house that records,edits,produces,and manages audio and video for small business owners and personal brands.The bulk of business is for podcasters and YouTubers,but includes making related media as well. Type of Business:Media production(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:100%female owned Use of funds:Website upgrades,rent,contract costs Received other assistance:PPP and EIDL funds around$5k. 23 Design to Grow,LLC(63108) 4 $32,000.00 532,000.00 $26,133.33 AB Business is a design/build studio that does in house fabrication focused on public art,teaching/workshops,events,and commercial furniture. Type of Business:Design studio(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent,retaining employees Received other assistance:PPP$8.7K,Small Business Impact Grant$9.9k 24 Suzanne May(60330) 1 7 $10,000.00 510,000.00 $8,033.33 AB Singer/songwriter that also teaches voice and songwriting lessons from home studio. Type of Business:Musician(home-based&sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:100%female owned Use of funds:Tour and equipment costs. Received other assistance:EIDL S12k,Unemployment$8k 25 The Twist(Kirk's Ship,LLC)(60520) 4 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,916.67 TTH Busines is a Restaurant,Bar&Nightclub Type of Business:Bar/Restaurant Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Wages,retain employees Received other assistance:PPP&Employee Rention Credit over$50k 26 Elegant Tailoring,LLC(61865) 4 $50,000.00 521,335.00 $17,025.33 SB Business is a tailoring shop in the heart of downtown. Type of Business:Tailoring Shop(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Payroll and operational expenses. Received other assistance:Business received less than 56,000.00 in PPP funding. 27 Utah Hispanic Chamber of Commerce(62544) 2 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $39,833.33 SB Chamber of Commerce serving Hispanic businesses. Type of Business:Chamber of Commerce Disproportionately Impacted:100%BIPOC owned Use of funds:Wages Received other assistance:None 28 Utah Fitness Institute(62189) 5 $21,502.00 522,000.00 $17,526.67 SB Personal training and wellness retreat business. Type of Business:Fitness Studio(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Rent costs Received other assistance:Salt Lake County grant S22k 29 Match and Farnsworth,PC(62089) 4 $49,000.00 $49,000,00 $38,955.00 SB Business is a small private law firm that provides representation to individuals who are unable to work due to physical or mental disabilities. Type of Business:Law Firm(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:100°%female owned Use of funds:Payroll Received other assistance:Business received more than$50k from PPP. 30 Antidote Cosmeceuticals,LLC(60991) 6 $8,000.00 58,000.00 $6,304.00 SB Business manufactures bottles and sells skin care products. Type of Business:Skin care(sole proprietor) Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Facility upgrades and payroll Received other assistance:PPP,EIDL,&CCL Stabilization Grant-over$200k 31 First Steps,Inc.(60261) 1 1 $50,000.00 512,000.00 $9,140.00 SB Business is a child care center. Type of Business:Daycare Disproportionately Impacted:None Use of funds:Facility upgrades and payroll Received other assistance:PPP,EIDL,&CCL Stabilization Grant-over$200k EXHIBIT B SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR PHASE 1 COMMUNITY RECOVERY GRANTS (To add following City Council meeting and vote) Dear Mayor and City Council, The Community Recovery Committee (CRC) knows that the COVID-19 pandemic and related shutdowns were devastating to many small businesses in Salt Lake City, and many have struggled to financially recover from the effects of the pandemic. The Committee also understands the difficulties that small businesses face. We put a great deal of care and effort into conducting a fair and equitable process that would award as much money to as many businesses as possible. With that said,this is a competitive grant program and the Committee agonized for many hours over difficult decisions to award limited funding. Thank you for your patience as we ensure we serve as many businesses as we can. Sincerely, Jake Maxwell Chair—Community Recovery Committee ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayor CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL { t Date Received: 2/6/2023 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 2/6/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 2/6/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Arts Council Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Arts Council Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Hannah Nielsen as a member of the Arts Council Board. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayor February 6, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City,Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Arts Council Board. Hannah Nielsen be appointed for a three year term, starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall,Mayor Cc: File P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 �v February 2, 2023 Dear Mayor Mendenhall, The Nominating Committee for the Arts Council Board has identified three strong candidates for the Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation Board of Directors and Advisory Board to the City. We would like to bring these three candidates forward for your approval and the subsequent approval of the City Council. The candidates' names are Hannah Nielsen (District 6), Matthew Coles and Jeff Driggs (District 7). The candidates' applications and resumes are attached to this letter. Hannah brings with her a career working as both an arts administrator and an artist,presently working as the Create Program Manager for The Leonardo Museum. Matthew exemplifies an individual in Salt Lake City dedicated to community service with a commitment to the artistic and cultural vibrancy of our community. Finally,Jeff is a seasoned professional in the nonprofit fundraising industry and brings with him many experiences related to board and civic engagement. To say that we are elated with the quality and tenure of our recommendations to you would be an understatement. Based on our interviews with the candidates, we believe that they will be active and engaged contributors to the Arts Council Board. We appreciate your consideration in forwarding these Board applications to the City Council, and we will continue to bring strong candidates to your attention as we review them. Thank you, as always, for your ongoing support of the Arts Council. Sincerely, Susan Rickman Board Chair, Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation Felicia Baca Executive Director,Arts Division/Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayor CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL { t Date Received: 2/21/2023 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 2/21/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 2/21/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Human Rights Commission STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Human Rights Commission RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Pamela Silberman as a member of the Human Rights Commission. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayor February 21, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City,Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Human Rights Commission. Pamela Silberman to be appointed for a four year term ending on Monday,December 27, 2027, starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayor CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL { t Date Received: 2/21/2023 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 2/21/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 2/21/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Human Rights Commission STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Human Rights Commission RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Will Terry as a member of the Human Rights Commission. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayor February 21, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City,Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Human Rights Commission. Will Terry to be appointed for a four year term ending on Monday,December 27, 2027, starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Cc: File P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704