Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03/21/2023 - Formal Meeting - Meeting Materials
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL REVISED AGENDA FORMAL MEETING March 21, 2023 Tuesday 7:00 PM Council Work Room 451 South State Street Room 326 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Darin Mano, Chair Victoria Petro,Vice Chair District 5 District 1 Alejandro Puy Chris Wharton Ana Valdemoros District 2 District 3 District 4 Dan Dugan Amy Fowler District 6 District 7 Generated: 09:25:22 Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI-Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES A. OPENING CEREMONY: 1. Council Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meeting. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4. The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing March 31, 2023 as International Transgender Day of Visibility in Salt Lake City. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Funding Allocations for One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant&Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider an appropriations resolution that would authorize grant funding to selected applicants and adopt the One-Year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The plan includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding, HOME Investment Partnership Program funding, Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funding, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funding. The resolution would also approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 18, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 865 South Soo East The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property at 865 South 50o East Street from RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential District) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial District),this would also amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map. The intent of the rezone request is to allow for the conversion of the existing single-family dwelling on the property to a commercial use. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The property is located within Council District 5. Petitioner: Rick Service, Petition No.: PLNPCM2o22-00301 & PLNPCM2022-00302 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 4, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 3. Ordinance: Electric Vehicle Readiness Off-Street Parking Stalls Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend and update City code requirements for parking on some new construction projects. New multi-family housing projects like condos and apartments would be required to add electrical capacity on twenty percent of their off-street parking stalls. The electrical capacity would allow the future addition of electric vehicle charging stations at the stalls constructed for them. The proposal would amend the City's land use code at 21-A.44.040. The requirement would also apply to major reconstructions of qualifying properties in multi-family zones. For more information on this item visit https://tinyuri.com/SLCEVReadiness FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, January 3, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 4, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 4. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City's budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding for more repairs to City Hall from the March 2020 Earthquake, upgrades to public safety radio systems, police officer recruitment and retention bonuses, and additional emergency rental assistance among other items. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 7, 2023; Tuesday, March 14, 2023; and Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment- Tuesday, March 7, 2023 and Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 5. Ordinance: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Text Amendment The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of the Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) regulations. The proposed code revisions would eliminate the conditional use requirement for detached ADUs in single-family residential zones. They would also aim to lower zoning barriers to construction of ADUs in general. The proposed changes would seek to strike a better balance between encouraging construction of ADUs and mitigating impacts to neighboring properties. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-000475 For more information on this item visit www.tinyurl.com/ADUTextAmendment FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 17, 2023; Tuesday, February 7, 2023; Tuesday, March 7, 2023; and Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, January 17, 2023 and Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, February 7, 2023 and Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday,April 4, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). C. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: i. Resolution: $3.5 Million One-time HOME-ARPA Grant Funding The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize grant funding to selected applicants.As part of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), the City received $3.5 million from the U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department or HUD. The one-time grant funding for the HOME program is designated for housing opportunities to help individuals experiencing or at risk of homelessness and domestic violence survivors. There are several steps required by HUD for the City to accept and be able to use the funding including a community assessment, allocation plan, and amending the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2. Ordinance: Amending the Zoning Text Pertaining to the use of Landscape Materials The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would make zoning changes allowing the City to be listed as eligible by entities that provide rebates for property owners who replace lawn grass with more water-wise landscaping. These landscape zoning amendments are limited to the program requirements for these rebate programs. The transmittal to the Council states that additional landscape changes are underway and being studied, but not included in this petition. The current proposal includes placing limits on the amount of lawn grass that can be planted based on use, size of landscaped area, and slope. It also makes other changes. The proposal would amend the zoning text of Section 21A.48.05o and definitions in Title 21A associated with the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the use of landscape materials. The Council may amend other related chapters and sections of Title 21A Zoning as part of this proposal. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022- 01055 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, January 17, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, January 17, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 3. Ordinance: Glendale Regional Park Plan The Council will consider an ordinance that would adopt the Glendale Regional Park Plan to be part of the City's general plan as a specific plan found in the Westside Master Plan. Public Lands Department has been working with a consultant, Design Workshop, to develop a plan to guide development of the 17- acre Glendale Regional Park site, formerly known as Raging Waters. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/GlendaleRegionalPark FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). D. COMMENTS: 1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2. Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) E. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Annexation at Approximately 2200 West Between 2800 North - 330o North The Council will consider the annexation application and petition located at approximately 2200 West between 2800 North — 330o North. The City Council has 14 days from the date of receipt (March 17, 2023) by the Recorder's office to accept or deny the Petition,which includes the application. If no action is taken within the 14-day window,the Petition will be considered accepted.Accepting the Petition is not approval of the annexation request. Acceptance begins the next step in the annexation process which includes notices sent to property owners, a protest period and the final consideration by the Council. The designation of the zoning of the property will be considered throughout the process and defined in the ordinance considered by the Council. The Council has the option to request Planning Commission review the petition in their public meeting, and forward a recommendation on the proposed annexation and zoning. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE. G. CONSENT: i. Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.7) for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 7) for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 2. Board Appointment: Racial Equity in Policing Commission — Jason Wessel The Council will consider approving the appointment of Jason Wessel to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission for a term ending December 29, 2025. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 3. Board Appointment: Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs (CDCIP)Advisory Board — Teresa Gregori The Council will consider approving the appointment of Teresa Gregori to the CDCIP Advisory Board for a term ending June 1, 2026. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 4. Board Appointment: Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs (CDCIP)Advisory Board — Miranda Cask The Council will consider approving the appointment of Miranda Cask to the CDCIP Advisory Board for a term ending June 1, 2026. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 5. Board Appointment: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails (PNUT)Advisory Board — Dave John The Council will consider approving the appointment of Dave John to the PNUT Board for a term ending March 21, 2026. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. H. ADJOURNMENT: CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 6:oo p.m. on Monday,March 20, 2023,the undersigned,duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1)posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701,and(2)a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. CINDY LOU TRISHMAN SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City&County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation,which may include alternate formats,interpreters,and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance.To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 8oi-535-7600,or relay service 711. 0 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION Psolution JOINT RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MARCH 31,2023,AS INTERNATIONAL TRANSGENDER DAY OF VISIBILITY IN SALT LAKE CITY WHEREAS,International Transgender Day of Visibility is observed and celebrated on March 3ish and WHEREAS,International Transgender Day of Visibility is a time to celebrate and recognize a large community of people,including people who identify as transgender, nonbinary,and gender nonconforming;and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor of Salt Lake City are committed to 'F advocating for the rights,dignity,and equality for transgender and gender- diverse people everywhere;and WHEREAS, transgender,nonbinary,and gender nonconforming people have long added to the rich tapestry of Salt Lake City and Utah as a whole by telling their stories 'O through activism and advocacy and living openly and authentically;and WHEREAS, more transgender,nonbinary,and gender nonconforming people are gracing the covers of magazines,film,and television,raising awareness of their gender identities and highlighting their contributions to our culture and history as artists,musicians,healers,workers,and organizers;and WHEREAS, in light of recent legislation around the country and here in Utah aimed to target and exclude transgender youth,it is especially crucial that we as a City come together to uplift and celebrate our transgender community;and WHEREAS,International Transgender Day of Visibility is a time to join the transgender community around the world and acknowledge their communities'many contributions,accomplishments,and leadership. NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Salt Lake City recognizes March 31,2o23,as International Transgender Day of Visibility in Salt Lake City. BEflFURTHER RESOLVED, that the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor of SaltLake City recognize the bravery of the transgender community as it fights for equal dignity and respect. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor of Salt Lake City invite residents to observe International Transgender Day of Visibility by learning more about the trans experience in an effort to decrease stigma,combat hate,discrimination, and misinformation. Adopted this9�day ofMarch 2023. ErinMenden al! mMano,Chair Salt Lake City Mayor Salt Lake City Council Member,District Five SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION �esoCixtiuix WWAM6 ,Pace Chair ejandro Puy Salt Lake City Council Member,District one Salt Lake City Council M Taio Chris Wharton Ana Valdemoros Salt Lake City Council Member,District Three Salt Lake City CatkicilM 6er,District Four Dan Dugan Amy Fowler Salt Lake City Council Member,District Six Salt Lake City Council Member,District Seven y� Cf1'Y,Grgs� 01 r JOINT RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MARCH 31, 2023,AS INTERNATIONAL TRANSGENDER DAY OF VISIBILITY IN SALT I-AKE CITY WHEREAS, International Transgender Day of Visibility is observed and celebrated on March 31st; and WHEREAS, International Transgender Day of Visibility is a time to celebrate and recognize a large community of people, including people who identify as transgender, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming; and WHEIZMAS, the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor of Salt Lake City are committed to advocating for the rights, dignity, and equality for transgender and gender-diverse people everywhere; and WHEREAS, transgender, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming people have long added to the rich tapestry of Salt Lake City and Utah as a whole by telling their stories through activism and advocacy and living openly and authentically; and WHEREAS, more transgender, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming people are gracing the covers of magazines,film, and television, raising awareness of their gender identities and highlighting their contributions to our culture and history as artists, musicians, healers, workers, and organizers; and WHEREAS, in light of recent legislation around the country and here in Utah aimed to target and exclude transgender youth, it is especially crucial that we as a City come together to uplift and celebrate our transgender community, and WHEREAS, International Transgender Day of Visibility is a time to join the transgender community around the world and acknowledge their communities'many contributions, accomplishments, and leadership. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that Salt Lake City recognizes March 31, 2023, as International Transgender Day of Visibility in Salt Lake City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor of Salt Lake City recognize the bravery of the transgender community as it fights for equal dignity and respect. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor of Salt Lake City invite residents to observe International Transgender Day of Visibility by learning more about the trans experience in an effort to decrease stigma, combat hate, discrimination, and misinformation. Adopted this day of March 2023. Erin Mendenhall Dain Mano, Chair Salt Lake City Mayor Salt Lake City Council Member,District Five Victoria Petro, Vice Chair Alejandro Puy Salt Lake City Council Member,District One Salt Lake City Council Member,District Two Chris Wharton Ana Valdemoros Salt Lake City Council Member,District Three Salt Lake City Council Member,District Four Dan Dugan Amy Fowler Salt Lake City Council Member,District Sir Salt Lake City Council Member,District Seven Item Bi h PUBLIC HEARING \•�' ��" MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY 4off fill,111••\\'\ TO: City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Budget and Policy Analyst DATE: March 21,2023 RE: Annual U.S. Housing and Urban Development(HUD)Grant Funding Allocations 2023-2024: Community Development Block Grants(CDBG),Emergency Solutions Grants(ESG), HOME Investment Partnership and Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS(HOPWA) MOTION 1t—CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. MOTION 2—CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date. Staff Note:All public comments received through any communication channel will be included in the City's report to HUD. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ZJl� or, TO: City Council Members Project Timeline: Set Date:March 7,2023 FROM: Ben Luedtke is'Briefing&Public Hearing:March 21,2023 Budget&Public Policy Analyst end Briefing:April 4,or 11,2023(if needed) Potential Action:April 18, 2023 DATE: March 21,2023 RE: Annual U.S. Housing and Urban Development(HUD)Grant Funding Allocations 2023-2024: Community Development Block Grants(CDBG),Emergency Solutions Grants(ESG), HOME Investment Partnership and Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The U.S. Housing and Urban Development(HUD)Department's annual grant programs are one of the most significant non-pandemic related ongoing funding sources the City receives from the Federal Government.Fiscal Year 2024 is subject to the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan which identifies funding goals,strategies,and a targeted area for spending CDBG dollars on public infrastructure and economic development.The relevant advisory boards have reviewed and the Mayor has recommended a list of grant awards(see attached funding log),and the Council will make the final decision of grant awards,potentially on April 18.See the additional info section for the goals and strategies applications must advance to qualify for these grant funds and Attachment 3 for a map of the target area.The Council is scheduled to hold a hybrid public hearing on Tuesday,March 21 to hear from the public and grant applicants regarding community needs for the 2023-2024 funding cycle. As seen in most years,the requested funding from applicants is significantly greater than available funds. Requests are 121%of available funding: $1o,830,805 is requested compared to$8,937,395 in available funding. HUD has not provided Salt Lake City's final grant award amounts.The available funding could change based on HUD's pending confirmation of the amounts.The resident advisory boards provided recommendations in the event funding is more or less than estimated.The board's recommendations are shown on the Funding Log at the end of each grant and a summary table in the additional info section below.The table below summarizes requested and available funding by grant.Note that the HOPWA grant has more funding available than requested.HOPWA grant awards to the City have more than doubled in the last several years. Funding awards for the other three grants have not seen similar increases. Grant Request Available Requests as% of Funding Available CDBG $ 6,042,769 $ 5,597,763 lo8% ESG $ 895,175 $ 303,100 295% HOME $ 2,949,553 $ 2,023,661 146% HOPWA $ 943,3o8 $ 1,012,841 93% TOTAL $ 1o,830,805 $ 8,937,365 121% CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 Goal of the briefing:Discuss the Council's federal grant priorities,receive a briefing about funding recommendations,ask questions about specific applications,and allocate funding across eligible programs and projects. $30,000 Minimum Funding Level Six years ago,the City established a minimum funding level for grant awards.HUD recommends a$35,000 minimum award for projects.The Housing Stability Division recommends$30,00o after consultations with applicants.The minimum award is aimed at maximizing community benefits from grant awards.The intent of this policy is to balance the burden for the Administration and recipient organizations to manage grant funds with the goal of having positive impacts in the community.This year,no applications were disqualified for requesting less than the minimum funding requirement. Scoring Applications and Funding Recommendations CDBG and ESG projects receive scores and funding recommendations from the Community Development and Capital Improvement Program or CDCIP Board.HOME and HOPWA projects receive funding recommendations from the Housing Trust Fund(HTF)Advisory Board.The advisory board funding recommendations are provided to the Mayor and City Council.The Council receives another set of funding recommendations from the Mayor.The final decision is made by the Council for grant award amounts.Attachment 1 shows projects ranked by the combined score within each grant category. Attachment 2 is the funding log for all four federal grants which has more details than Attachment i such as project and program descriptions and prior year award amounts for returning applications.The funding log combines advisory board and Administration scores as shown in the far-right column where maximum potential scores are also shown. Funding Log Trends Council staff noticed the following trends after reviewing the funding logs: Identical Recommendations—This year,the advisory board and mayoral funding recommendations are identical for all four grants New Applications—This year there are eight new applications for CDBG,one for ESG,three for HOME and no new applications for HOPWA.Note that some of the new applications represent new programs offered by organizations that have applied to fund different programs they operate.The new applications are: - CDBG Public Services*5—Legal Aid Society of Salt Lake's Domestic Violence Victim Assistance requested$30,00o and recommended to receive full funding. o Note this organization was previously a longstanding applicant to the City's CDBG program.An update to an earlier consolidated plan resulting in the program becoming ineligible.After several years of not applying,the program is again seeking grant funding. - CDBG Public Services*7—Odyssey House's Safety and Trauma Supportive Services for Mental Health Populations requested$55,06o but is not recommended for funding. - CDBG Public Services*8—Salt Lake American's Survival Services for Refugees requested$47,52o but is not recommended for funding. - CDBG Public Services*10—Neighborworks Salt Lake's Financial Counseling requested$100,00o but is not recommended for funding. - CDBG Public Services*12—Spy Hop Production's Tech Liberation Project requested$30,00o but is not recommended for funding. - CDBG Public Services*17—The United Way of Salt Lake's Utah 211 Resource Navigation of Salt Lake City Residents requested$175,484 but is not recommended for funding. - CDBG Public Services*18—Wasatch Community Gardens'Green Team requested$61,604 and is recommended to receive$30,489. Page 12 - CDBG Public Services*19—Fourth Street Clinic's Health and Housing Transition Team requested $126,685 and is recommended to receive$40,456. - ESG Part 2*1—Asian Association of Utah Two Case Managers for Homeless Prevention requested $288,377 and is recommended to receive$32,318. - HOME*3—First Step House'Stratford Apartments requested$500,00o and is recommended to receive$408,320. - HOME*7—Volunteers of America'Youth Resource Center Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program requested$100,00o and is recommended to receive$99,372• - HOME#8—Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division's Homebuyer Program requested$600,00o and is recommended to receive$349,076. Disqualified Applications—No applications were disqualified across the four grants this year. Returning Applications without Funding Recommendations—There is one returning application that received grant awards in last year but did not receive a funding recommendation this year: - HOME*2—Neighborworks of Salt Lake housing development application requested$420,00o but is not recommended to receive funding.Last year,the program received$208,661. Increasing CDBG Housing Category Funding The chart below compares the annual funding in the housing category of CDBG over eight fiscal years.The Council identified affordable housing as a priority several years ago.The chart shows that a greater amount of CDBG funding has gone to housing in recent years.It's important to note that the Council's policy guidance is aligned with increasing CDBG housing funding.The recent policy decision to add program income annually in addition to the City's annual CDBG award from HUD increases the amount of funding available for housing. The funding over eight fiscal years is$15,132,714 in total assuming the FY2024 recommended amounts are approved by the Council.The funding has gone to several housing assistance programs during this time and some applications have been included every year.Examples of how this funding was used are first time homebuyer assistance,rehabilitation of existing housing,emergency home repairs(large and small),and accessibility improvements. Comparing Annual Housing Category CDBG Funding FY2O17 to FY2O24 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,333,547 $3,000,000 $2,263,557 $2,048,837 $2,500,000 $2,035,800 $2,000,000 $198551073 $1,415,000 $1,500,000 $1 130 000 > $1,050,900 $1,000,000 $500,000 2NEI oil Total CDBG Housing Funding 0 2017 0 2018 0 2019 0 2020 ■2021 ■2022 0 2023 0 2024 Note:FY2024 is funding recommended by the advisory board and Mayor Page 3 Increasing HOPWA Funding The chart below compares the City's annual HOPWA award over eight fiscal years.It shows a$567,o196 increase or 155%.The three other annual grants have HUD have not seen a similar increase.Rather they have remains relatively flat or even decreased over the same time.The City has awarded over$4.7 million of HOPWA grant funds during the eight years.The trend of increasing annual HOPWA awards is a result of the 2016 Housing Opportunities Through Modernization Act.It adjusted the federal funding formula to better reflect HIV epidemic data.Continued funding increases like those seen over the past eight years may not continue because the phased formula adjustment has now been fully implemented. Comparing HOPWA Annual Award FY2017 to FY2o24 $1,000,000 $932,841 $900,000 $800,000 0 1 se $700,000 �yb�poi $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $365,825 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 2017 2o18 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 POLICY QUESTIONS 1. Questions and/or Potential Funding Shifts—Does the Council have any questions about the advisory board and mayoral funding recommendations?Do any Council Members have potential funding shifts between applications they are considering? 2. Legislative Policy Guidance for Housing Stability Division Programs—The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration initial thoughts on legislative policy guidance for several programs operated by the Housing Stability Division that lack it and are proposed to receive HUD grant awards as listed below. The five applications below have a proposed total funding of$2,432,498• - CDBG Housing#4 Home Rehabilitation and Targeted Repair Program requested$70o,000 and proposed to receive$711,027 - CDBG Housing#5 Small Repair Program requested$40,50o and proposed to receive$41,142 - CDBG Housing#6 Shared Equity Program/Community Land Trust requested$400,000 and is proposed to receive$406,253 ➢ Staff Note:Council Members have expressed an interest to review the City's shared equity housing programs(existing and in development). The Council adopted Resolution 12 of 2017 which authorized creation of the Community Land Trust in the Housing Stability Division but the resolution does not contain legislative policy guidance such as prioritizing target populations,types of housing,geographic equity and other considerations. - CDBG Neighborhood Improvements#1 Neighborhood Business Fagade Improvement Program requested$800,000 and is proposed to receive$925,000 - HOME#8 The Homebuyer Program requested$600,000 and proposed to receive$349,076 Page 3. Adding 15%of HOME Grant Funds to RDA Notice of Funding Availability(NOFA)-The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration how adding HOME grant funds to the RDA NOFA would work.HUD requires 15%of annual HOME grant awards be reserved for Community Housing Development Organizations or CHDOs.The City has struggled to receive eligible applications from CHDOs. HUD has strict requirements for an organization to be an eligible CHDO.No eligible applications were received last year and again this year.Congress suspended deadlines for use of CHDO funds during the pandemic.If the current suspension ends on December 31,2023(no Congressional extension),then the City would have 24 months to commit the funds to eligible CHDOs for low-to-moderate income rental or homebuyer housing creation and development.Failure to meet this requirement could risk returning funds to the federal government. 4. Grant Funds Cover Costs to Administer Programs—The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether costs incurred by the Attorney's Office,the Finance Department and Community&Neighborhoods Departments to help manage HUD programs are fully covered by the grants.The recommended funding for CDBG Administration costs is$200,000 less than the maximum allowed by HUD.If the Council wanted to increase the CDBG Administration,then the funds would need to be transferred from other applications with funding recommendations. 5. Encouraging Transportation Applications(none this year)—The Council may wish to ask the Administration how more organizations can be encouraged to and assisted with submitting applications to advance the City's Transportation goal in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan.In recent years the Transportation Division applied for and received over$1 million of CDBG funds such as bus stop improvements,the 1300 South Ballpark TRAX station ADA and pedestrian crossing improvements,and discounted HIVE Passes for no-to-low-income residents. ADDITIONAL&BACKGROUND INFORMATION Funding Contingencies The advisory boards provided recommendations in case final grant funding amounts from HUD are more or less than the estimated amounts.These funding contingencies are summarized in the table below.The Council may wish to identify which funding contingencies are supported in the event HUD's confirmation of final funding amounts isn't available by the scheduled vote on April 18. Grant If MORE Funding Available If LESS Funding Available Maximize#1 Administration at 20%and increase all Keep#i Administration maximized at 20%and Housing category projects except#i ASSIST and decrease from Housing#i ASSIST and Neighborhood Neighborhood Improvement category projects except Improvement#1 Neighborhood Business(Facade) #i Neighborhood Business(Facade)Improvement Improvement Program in equal amounts down to Program proportionally based on their percentage of $800,000 each.Then reduce proportionally across all CDBG total award and weighted by score.Do not exceed 15% Housing and Neighborhood Improvement category Public Services cap,and increase Public Services projects based on their percentage of total award and projects proportionally without going above the weighted by score.Do not exceed 15%Public Service requested funding amount. cap,and decrease Public Services projects proportionally without going below the$30,000 funding floor. Maximize#i Administration at 7.5%and,not Keep#i Administration maximized at 7.5%and,not exceeding Part 1 cap,increase proportionally across all exceeding Part 1 cap,decrease proportionally across ESG projects without going above the maximum request. all projects without going below the$30,000 funding floor. Maximize#io Administration at io%,set aside 15%for Keep#1 o Administration maximized at to%,set aside the Community Housing Development Organization 15%for the Community Housing Development HOME requirement,and increase proportionally across all Organization requirement,and decrease proportionally funded project based on the percentage of the total across all funded project based on the percentage of the award and weighted by score. total award and weighted by score. Maximize#5 Administration at 3%,and fund#i Keep#5 Administration maximized at 3%and reduce Housing Connect to their full amount,then fund#4 funding proportionally by percentage but weighted by HOPWA Utah Community Action to their full amount.If there is score. funding above this,then award funding proportionally across all four programs. Page 15 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan Goals and Strategies The City must report progress to HUD on how funding awards advance the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan goals. In past years,some applicants that received funding were not aligned with the five-year plan.As a result,the services provided by those organizations could not be reported to HUD.If a city does not adequately fund applications advancing the five-year plan,then HUD could view the program as underperforming,lower future grant award amounts,and/or audit the city's program.The below table summarizes the goals and strategies of the current consolidated plan. MMF_Goals Strategies 1. Support housing programs that address the needs of aging housing stock through targeted rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within the neighborhoods 2. Support affordable housing development that increases the number and types of units available for qualified Housing: Provide expanded housing options residents for all economic and demographic segments of 3• Support programs that provide access to home Salt Lake City's population while diversifying ownership housing stock within neighborhoods 4• Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and/or end homelessness 5. Support programs that provide connection to permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs 6. Provide housing and essential supportive services to persons with HIV AIDS 1. Within eligible target areas,improve bus stop amenities as a way to encourage the accessibility of public transit and enhance the experience of public Transportation: Promote accessibility and transit affordability of multimodal transportation 2. Within eligible target areas,expand and support the options installation of bike racks,stations,and amenities as a way to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation 3. Support access to transportation,prioritizing very low- income and vulnerable populations 1. Support job training and vocational rehabilitation programs that increase economic mobility 2. Improve visual and physical appearance of deteriorating commercial buildings-limited to CDBG Target Area 3. Provide economic development support for Community Resiliency: Provide tools to microenterprise businesses increase economic and/or housing stability 4• Direct financial assistance to for-profit businesses 5. Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement,social development, and change the cycle of poverty 6. Promote digital inclusion through access to digital communication technologies and the internet 7. Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population Homeless Services: Expand access to 1. Expand support for medical and dental care options for supportive programs that help ensure those experiencing homelessness homelessness is rare,brief and non- 2. Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency reoccurring Overflow Operations Page 16 Goals Strategies 3. Provide support for programs undertaking outreach services to address the needs of those living an unsheltered life 4. Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services Behavioral Health: Provide support for low i. Expand treatment options,counseling support,and income and vulnerable populations case management for those experiencing behavioral experiencing behavioral health concerns such health crisis as substance abuse disorders and mental health challenges CDBG Public Infrastructure and Economic Development Target Area in 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan(Attachment 3) The target area creates geographic boundaries for spending CDBG funding on economic development and public infrastructure improvements.These applications are included in the CDBG Neighborhood Improvements category on the funding log.Examples of these project types includes business fagade improvement grants, public transit improvements,and creation of ADA ramps.The geographic target areas do not apply to housing or public services category applications. Focusing federal grants in these target areas is intended to maximize community impact and stimulate investments from other entities into the neighborhoods.The Council chose the current boundaries to align Census tracts with relatively high concentrations of poverty and to overlap with three RDA project areas:North Temple,9-Line,and State Street. Summary of Available Funding by Grant The table below shows funding sources by grant.Note that only CDBG and HOME grant programs see some funds returned as program income from loan repayments.The City has a new practice of adding program income to the annual HUD grant allocations.Previously some program income sat unused for years.The new practice is meant to ensure funding is made available to benefit residents and better adhere to HUD guidance. When prior year grant awards are recaptured,it means the program or project was unable to use the funding as intended which happens for various reasons. Grant Source Amount Total HUD Award $3,397,763 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Recaptured Funding $ 1,200,000 $5,597,763 Program Income $ 1,000,000 Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG) HUD Award $3o3,ioo $303,100 Recaptured Funding $ o HUD Award $1,023,661 HOME Investment Partnership Recaptured Funding $200,000 $2,023,661 Program Income $ 800,000 Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS HUD Award $932,84i (HOPWA) Recaptured Funding $80,000 $1,012,841 Community Development and Block Grant(CDBG) Total CDBG Funding Requests: $6,042,769(io8%of available) Total Available for Allocation: $5,597,763 Page 17 CDBG funds focus on community development with an emphasis on physical improvements.The Community Development&Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board(CDCIP)submits funding recommendations for this grant.CDBG funds are allocated to organizations in four categories: - City Administration(limited to 20%of the annual grant award) - Housing - Neighborhood Improvements:transportation and economic development infrastructure(subject to target area see Attachment 3 for map) - Public Services(limited to 15%of the annual grant award) Public Services This category is directed to services for individuals in need and not necessarily to physical improvements.This is typically the most competitive category.Funding is awarded to non-profits and governmental entities that provide programming to meet the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan's goals.This category is limited to 15%of the annual CDBG award.The Mayor has recommended funding requests that add up to the 15%maximum.If the Council would like to allocate money to any application beyond the Mayor's recommended funding in this category,then those funds must be shifted from another public services application. Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG) Total ESG Funding Requests: $895,175(295%of available) Total Available for Allocation: $303,100 ESG funds focus on preventing homelessness and providing services to persons experiencing homelessness.The Community Development&Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board(CDCIP)submits funding recommendations for this grant.ESG funds are allocated to organizations providing services in three categories: - City Administration(limited to 7.5%of the annual grant award) - Street Outreach and Emergency Shelter(Part 1 and limited to 6o%of the annual grant award) - Homelessness Prevention,Rapid Re-Housing,Homeless Management Information Systems(HMIS) (Part 2) HOME Investment Partnership Total HOME Funding Requests: $2,949,553 (146%of available) Total Available for Allocation: $2,023,661 HOME Investment Partnership focuses on expanding the supply of quality affordable housing for low-to- moderate-income residents.The Housing Trust Fund(HTF)Advisory Board submits funding recommendations for this grant.HUD mandates 15%of the annual grant award go to community housing development organizations(CHDO).There are several requirements for CHDO status including annual certification with the City,be a private nonprofit organization,and who serves on the governing board. Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS(HOPWA) Total HOPWA Funding Requests: $943,3o8(93%of available) Total Available for Allocation: $1,012,841 HOPWA is the only federal program dedicated entirely to the housing needs of people living with HIV/AIDS. The Housing Trust Fund(HTFAB)Advisory Board submits funding recommendations for this grant. ATTACHMENTS 1. FY 2023-24 Grant Recommendations by Combined Score 2. FY 2023-24 Funding Log 3. CDBG Public Infrastructure and Economic Development Target Area Map for 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan ACRONYMS AMI—Area Median Income CDBG—Community Development Block Grant CDCIP—Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board CDCU—Community Development Corporation of Utah CHDO—Community Housing Development Organization CIP—Capital Improvement Program DPA—Down Payment Assistance DWS—Department of Workforce Services ESG—Emergency Solutions Grant FTE—Full time employee FY—Fiscal Year HMIS—Homeless Management Information System HOME—HOME Investment Partnership Program HOPWA—Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS HRC—Homeless Resource Center HTFAB—Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board HUD—Housing and Urban Development LMI—Low-to-Moderate Income NOFA—Notice of Funding Availability NWSL—Neighborworks Salt Lake RDA—Redevelopment Agency STRMU—Short-Term Rental,Mortgage and Utility(Assistance) TBRA—Tenant-Based Rental Assistance UCA—Utah Community Action(aka Salt Lake Community Action Program) UTA—Utah Transit Authority Page 9 Board-24 Federal Grant Funding 2023 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT $5,597,763 .: APPLICANT PROJECT/PROGRANI ORE REQU CDCI BOARD FUNDING MAYOR FUNDING COUNCIL FUN-D.q RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS ALLOCATION ASSIST Inc-Community Design Center Emergency Home Repair&Accessibility and Community Design 81.14 $ 800,000 $ 92fi,]fifi $ 92fi,766 $ First Step House Recovery Residence Improvements ]6.14 $ 374,000 $ 379,703 $ 379,703 $ - ICAST Trolley Lane Rehab and Decarbonizing ]5.]1 $ 455,792 $ 462,389 $ 462,389 $ - NelghbOrworksSaltLake Salt Lake Housing Services 75.29 $ 400,000 $ 406,267 $ -6,267 $ Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division Small Repair Program ]5.14 $ 40,500 $ 41,142 $ 41,142 $ i, Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division Rehab and Targeted Repair Program 73.29 $ 700,000 $ 711,027 $ 711,027 $ SMt Lake City Housing Stability Division Shared Equity Program .9.57 $ ico,000 $ 406,253 $ 40fi,253 $ $ 3,170,292 $ 3,333,54] $ 3,333,54] $ 8 W Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division Economic Development Facade Program(NBIP) 80.43 $ 800,000 $ 925,000 $ 925,000 $ 0 0� w f $ 800,000 $ 925,000 $ 925,000 $ Catholic Community Services Weigand Homeless Resource Center 88.23 $ 50,000 $ 41,090 $ 41,090 $ First Step House Employment Preparation end Placement 85.29 $ 59,933 $ 56,492 $ 56,492 $ Salt Lek,Donated Dental Community Donated Dental Project 84.90 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ First Step House Peer Support Services 84.86 $ 52,043 $ 52,892 $ 52,892 $ YWCA DV&Residential Services 84.48 $ 89,100 $ 56,249 $ 56,249 $ The Roed Home Housing Staffing 84.0] $ 50,000 $ 50,OOo $ 50,OOo $ The INN Between Medical Respite Housing and Hospice 83.93 $ 95,565 $ 56,084 $ 56,084 $ - Neighborhood House Early Childhood Education 82.74 $ 52,009 $ 43,995 $ 43,995 $ The Roed Home Homeless Resource Centers 81.86 $ 110,000 $ 55,450 $ 55,450 $ _ Fourth Street Clinic Health a nd Housing Transition Team 81.60 $ 126,685 $ 40,456 $ 40,456 $ The Children's Center Utah Therapeutic Preschool 81.29 $ 55,000 $ 30,489 $ 30,489 $ - Legal Aid Society of Salt Lake Domestic Violence Victim Assistance 80.57 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ South Valley 5anc[ua.y Domestic Violence Shelter 79.00 $ 40,OOO $ 30,489 $ 30,489 $ - International Rescue Committee Upward Mobility for Refugees 78.43 $ 60,OOO $ 30,489 $ 30,489 $ Wasatch Community Gardens G reen Team lob Training 78.29 $ 61,604 $ 30,489 $ 30,489 $ Salt Lake American Survival Services for Refugees 75.26 $ 47,520 $ $ $ Spy Hop Productions Spy Hop's Tech Liberation Project 74.36 $ 30,000 $ $ $ Odyssey House,Utah Safety and Trauma Support Services ]3.93 $ 55,060 $ $ $ United Way of Salt Lake Utah 211:Resource Navigation 73.43 $ NeighborWorks Selt Lek, Salt Lake Financial Counseling fi9.8fi $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ 1,395,003 $ 6Bq,684 I$ 659,664 1$ i Salt Lake City Housing Stability/Finance/Attorney Administration of Grant Programs N/A $ 679,552 $ 679,552 $ 679,552 $ - $ 6]9,5 2 $ 679,552 $ 679,552 $ $ 6,044,S47 $ 3 $ 5,597,763 $ A. Catholic Community Services Weigand Homeless Resource Center 88OL, $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ First Step House Resource Center Program 8- $ 611818 $ 40,636 $ 40,636 $ Family Promise Salt Lake Community-Based Family Shelter 83.86 $ 48,000 $ 30,408 $ 30,408 $ - Volunteers of America,Utah IY..th Resource Center 83.05 $ 100,000 $ 30,408 $ 30,408 $ o Volunteers of America,Utah I GEK Women'.Resource Center 82.0] $ 128,000 $ 30,408 $ 30,408 $ $ 38],8]8 9 391,860 $ 1g1,96o $ 0 z The Road Hame Rapid Re-housing 82.86 $ 128,000 $ Asian Association of Utah Homeless Prevention and Support for BIPC Com 81.08 $ 288,3]]Ir $ 32,318 $ 32,318 $ Utah Community Action Diversion Program ]9.]3 $ 68,188 $ 31,853 $ 31,853 $ - `a Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division Administration N/A $ 22,732 $ 22,]32 $ 22,732 $ $ 507,297 $ 121,240 $ 121,240 $ $ 895,175 $ 905,100 $ 303,100 $ • 1 PROJECT/PROGRAM NIE First Step House Stratford Apartments 85.69 $ 500,000 1$ 408,320 $ 408,320 $ South Valley Services DV Survivor Housing Assistance 84.14 $ 138,500 $ 138,431 $ 138,431 $ Volunteers of America,Utah YRC Tenant-Based Rental Assistance 83.0] $ 100,000 $ 99,372 $ 99,372 $ Utah Community Action Tenant-Based Rental Assistance 83.05 $ 210,337 $ 208,757 $ 208,757 $ The Road Home Tenant-Based Rental Assistance 77.74 $ 350,000 $ 349,839 $ 349,839 $ i Community Development Corporation Down Payment Assistance ]5.]9 $ 374,800 $ 213,950 $ 213,950 $ Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division Salt Lake City Homebuyer Program ]5.]9 $ 600,000 $ 349,076 $ 349,076 $ NeighborWorks Salt Lake Affordable Home Buydown Program ]2.5] $ 420,000 $ $ $ Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division CHDO Set-Aside N/A $ 153,718 $ 153,550 $ 153,550 $ Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division HOME Administration N/A $ 102,478 $ 102,366 $ 102,366 $ $ 2,949,833 $ 2,023,661 $ 2,023,661 $ HOUSINGOPPORTUNITIES FOR • AIDS ..,Jh.,-FUCAN1 PROJECT/PROGRAM CDC. BOARD FUNDING .-OR FUNDING COUNCIL FLINDING1 RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS ALLOCATIONS Utah AIDS Foundation Supportive Services Program 88.50 $ 70,000 $ 75,319 $ 75,319 $ Utah AIDS Foundation Mental Health Services 8].1] $ 100,000 $ 107,600 $ 107,600 $ - Housing Connect Tenant Based Rental Assistance 80.33 $ 584,684 $ 629,102 $ 629,102 $ - UtahCommunityAction Housing Info/STRMU/PHP/Supportive Services ]8.5] $ 160,639 $ 172,835 $ 172,835 $ Salt La ke City Housing Stability Division HOPWA Administration N/A $ 27,985 $ 27,985 $ 27,985 $ $ 943,308 $ 1,012,841 $ 1,012,841 $ SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2023/24 1 1 FUNDING1 1 BY FEDERALREGULATION Category Maximum Allocated Balance 1 1 1', 200,000 1 1 PROJECT '1 DESCRIPTION 1US GRANT AWARDS REQU1 1 1 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED' ADMINISTRATIONCITY 1 Housing Stability Division/Finance/ Funding for salaries and operational expenses of Housing Stability,Finance, FY22-23 $ 710,934 REQUEST: $ 679,552 Attorney's Office and the Attorney's Office to administer and monitor the federal grants and to FY21-22 $ 701,832 CDCIP: $ 679,552 conduct the community processes. FY20-21 $ 701,833 MAYOR: $ 679,552 NOTE:In prior years,these were separate budget line items,but they have FY19-20 $ 686,791 COUNCIL: $ 679,552 been included as one request for FY23/24 to allow for greater flexibility of the FY18-19 $ 705,436 funds to be utilized between the Departments. 5 YR TOTAL $ 3,506,826 Note:20%is the maximum amount allowed(PLEASE NOTE-the Administration is not requesting the full maximum allowed this year,with the inclusion of REQUEST: $ 679,552 15.5% program income,as it would be difficult to fully expend at current staffing levels) CDCIP: $ 679,552 15.5% CITY ADMINISTRATION TOTAL MAYOR: $ 679,552 15.5% COUNCIL: $ 679,552 15.5% HOUSING 1 ASSIST,Inc. Supporting salaries,operational,and rehabilitation activities including FY22-23 $ 700,000.00 REQUEST: $ 800,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Emergency Home Repair&Accessibility and plumbing,heating&electrical,radon testing/mitigation,roof repair, FY21-22 $ 700,000.00 CDCIP: $ 926,766 Maximum score:97 81.14 Community Design accessibility ramps,and accessibility design projects,etc. FY20-21 $ 391,373.00 MAYOR: $ 926,766 FY19-20 $ 391,000.00 COUNCIL: $ 926,766 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Support housing programs that address needs of aging FY18-19 $ 320,000.00 housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and 5 YR TOTAL $ 2,502,373.00 diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. 2 First Step House Funds for critical rehabilitation at 4 recovery residences(transitional housing) FY22-23 $ 322,000.00 REQUEST: $ 374,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: for sober living.Note that this application would fund improvements to four Maximum score:97 73.29 Recovery Residence Rehabilitation g• PP• P CDCIP: $ 379,703 separate buildings in Salt Lake City. MAYOR: $ 379,703 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Support housing programs that address needs of aging COUNCIL: $ 379,703 housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and Applicant also submitted CDBG Public Services#2 and#3,ESG Part 1#3,and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. HOME#3. 3 International Center for Appropriate and Rehabilitation and energy efficiency upgrades for Trolley Lane Apartments,a FY22-23 $ 300,000 REQUEST: $ 455,792 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Sustainable Technology(ICAST) 17 unit low income housing facility located at 518 E 600 S.Note that CDCIP: $ 462,389 Maximum score:97 69.57 Rehabilitating and Decarbonizing Trolley Lane decarbonizing in this project is like making the building fully electric. MAYOR: $ 462,389 Improvements would include installation of solar panels,electrical system upgrades,smart thermostats,and replacing natural gas heating with electrical COUNCIL: $ 462,389 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Support housing programs that address needs aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and heat pump systems. diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 1 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2023/24 1 1 FUNDING1 1 BY FEDERALREGULATION Category Maximum Allocated Balance 1 1 1', 200,000 1 1 RP,L.ICANT/PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1US GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED' 4 Salt Lake City-Housing Stability Division Salaries and operational support for the Housing Rehabilitation and Target FY22-23 $ 500,000 REQUEST: $ 700,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Repair programs that provide home repair services that address health, FY21-22 $ 600,000 CDCIP: $ 711,027 Maximum score:97 75.71 Home Rehabilitation&Targeted Repair safety,and structural issues for low income homeowners. FY20-21 $ 485,600 MAYOR: $ 711,027 Program FY19-20 $ 439,873 COUNCIL: $ 711,027 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Support programsthat provide access to home FY18-19 $ 577,542 ownership via down payment assistance,and/or housing subsidy, 5 YR TOTAL $ 2,603,015 and/or financing. 5 Salt Lake City-Housing Stability Division Targeting qualifying seniors and persons with disabilities to provide small FY22-23 $ 30,000 REQUEST: $ 40,500 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: dollar value services for home improvement and service or repair. FY21-22 Maximum score:97 76.14 $ 60,000 CDCIP: $ 41,142 Salt Lake City Small Repair Program FY20-21 $ 60,000 MAYOR: $ 41,142 FY19-20 $ - COUNCIL: $ 41,142 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Expand housing support for aging resident that ensure FY18-19 $ - access to continued stable housing. 6 Salt Lake City-Housing Stability Division Community Land Trust program.Provides low to moderate income FY22-23 $ - REQUEST: $ 400,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: homebuyers the opportunity to purchase a home by removing the cost of the FY21-22 $ - CDCIP: $ 406,253 Maximum score:97 75.14 Shared Equity Program land.The resident will purchase the home/land improvements.Salt Lake City FY20-21 $ 250,000 MAYOR: $ 406,253 retains ownership of the land to ensure future affordability. FY19-20 $ - COUNCIL: $ 406,253 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:support programsthat provide access to home ownership via down payment assistance,and/or housing subsidy, FY18-19 $ _ The Division also submitted a similar application for HOME#8. and/or financing. 7 Neighborworks of Salt Lake Program to provide assistance to low to moderate-income(LMI)residents FY22-23 $ 196,837 REQUEST: $ 400,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: through home rehabilitations and down payments Maximum score:97 75.29 g P Y CDCIP: $ 406,267 Home Rehabilitation&Improvement MAYOR: $ 406,267 Applicant also submitted CDBG Public Services#10,and HOME#2. COUNCIL: $ 406,267 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Support housing programs that address needs of aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. REQUEST: $ 3,170,292 56.6% CDCIP: $ 3,333,547 59.6% HOUSING TOTAL MAYOR: $ 3,333,547 59.6% COUNCIL: $ 3,333,547 59.55% Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 2 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2023/24 1 1 FUNDING1 1 BY FEDERALREGULATION Category Maximum Allocated Balance 1 1 1', 200,000 1 1 L A PROJECT '1 DESCRIPTION 1US GRANT AWARDS REQU1 1 1 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED' EL NEIGHBORHOOD '/ TRANSPORTATION I / DEVELOPMENT I TARGETAREA SEE MAP IN ATTACHMENT3 1 Salt Lake City-Housing Stability Division Provide grant money to businesses for facade improvements,focusing on FY22-23 $ 650,000 REQUEST: $ 800,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: small businesses and target areas.Note the proposed funding increase Maximum score:97 80.43 Neighborhood Business Improvement B P P g FY21-22 $ 502,000 CDCIP: $ 925,000 Program(NBIP) reflects higher construction costs due to inflation and a greater level of FY20-21 $ 425,883 MAYOR: $ 925,000 demand in the target area. FY19-20 $ 319,642 COUNCIL: $ 925,000 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Economic Development efforts via FY18-19 $ 425,000 supporting the improvement and visibility of small businesses 5 YR TOTAL $ 2,322,525 through facade improvement programs. REQUEST: $ 800,000 14.3% NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS:TRANSPORTATION&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFASTRUCTURE TOTAL CDCIP: $ 925,000 16.5% MAYOR: $ 925,000 16.5% COUNCIL: $ 925,000 16.5% PUBLIC SERVICES 1 Catholic Community Services of Utah Provide case management services to individuals experiencing homelessness FY22-23 $ 35,000 REQUEST: $ 50,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: at the Weigand Homeless Resource Center. Maximum score:97 88.23 Case Manager-Weigand Homeless g FY21-22 $ - CDCIP: $ 41,090 Resource Center FY20-21 $ - MAYOR: $ 41,090 Applicant also submitted ESG Part 1#1. FY19-20 $ - COUNCIL: $ 41,090 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Expand case management support as awayto connect those experiencing homelessness with 5 YR TOTAL $ -TAL $ 35,000 permanent housing and supportive services 2 First Step House Provide supportive employment services to high-risk,high-need individuals in FY22-23 $ 30,299 REQUEST: $ 56,492 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: our community caught in the cycles of relapse,mental illness,incarceration, Maximum score:97 85.29 Employment Preparation and Placement Y g V P FY21-22 $ 41,700 CDCIP: $ 56,492 (EPP)Program homelessness,and unemployment. FY20-21 $ 47,000 MAYOR: $ 56,492 Applicant also submitted CDBG Housing#2,CDBG Public Services#3,ESG Part FY19-20 $ 30,000 COUNCIL: $ 56,492 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Providejob training/vocational training 1#3,and HOME#3. FY18-19 programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations. 5 YR TOTAL $ 148,999 3 First Step House Salaries and administrative costs for Peer Support Services(PSS)Program FY22-23 $ 30,000 REQUEST: $ 53,406 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: which provides peer-based supportive services,delivered b certified Peer Maximum score:97 84.86 Peer Support Services P P PP V FY21-22 $ 48,000 CDCIP: $ 52,892 Support Specialists. FY20-21 $ 50,000 MAYOR: $ 52,892 Applicant also submitted CDBG Housing#2,CDBG Public Services#2,ESG Part FY19-20 $ 38,806 COUNCIL: $ 52,892 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Behavioral Health:Expand treatment options,counseling support, 1#3,and HOME#3. FY18-19 $ 30,000 and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis. 5 YR TOTAL $ 196,806 Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2O23-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 3 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2023/24 1 1 FUNDING1 1 BY FEDERALREGULATION Category Maximum Allocated Balance 1 1 1', 200,000 1 1 PROJECT '1 DESCRIPTION 1US GRANT AWARDS REQU1 1 1 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL 4 International Rescue Committee Funds will facilitate Digital Inclusion staff to support refugee and other new FY22-23 $ 40,000 REQUEST: $ 60,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Americans access/learn digital technology skills,critical to improving their Maximum score:97 78.43 Digital Skills&Education Access to Build g f>N P g FY21-22 $ 54,400 CDCIP: $ 30,489 ResiliencyRefugees and New Americans economic and housing stability.Note staff requested data on whether the g FY20-21 $ - MAYOR: $ 30,489 refugee population increased in Salt Lake City in recent years such as from FY Afghanistan and Ukraine.State level figures show a significant increasea but 19-20 44$ ,629 COUNCIL: $ 30,489 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: community Resiliency:Promote digital inclusion through access to City-level data was not available at the time of publishing. FY18-19 digital communication technologies and the Internet. 5 YR TOTAL $ 139,029 5 Legal Aid Society of Salt Lake Funds will be used for the Domestic Violence Victim Assitance Program to New REQUEST: $ 30,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: provide free legal representation to victims of domestic violence,regardless Maximum score:97 80.57 Domestic Violence Victim Assistance P g P g CDCIP: $ 30,000 of their income,to obtain protective orders and civil stalking injunctions-- MAYOR: $ 30,000 directly addresses the problem by seeking civil protective orders and representing clients in court against perpetrators.The Bridge Gap program COUNCIL: $ 30,000 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Expand help to those in need of legal representation who are in dangerous situation.Note legal enables victims of domestic violence with a protective order to obtain representation is not a strategy or goal in the Consolidated Plan. expedited assistance with a divorce or parentage(custody)case. This application would improve housing stability. 6 Neighborhood House Association Assistance for families with childcare as they search for and maintain FY22-23 $ 40,000 REQUEST: $ 52,009 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: employment.Funds will support earl education teacher salaries and Maximum score:97 82.74 Neighborhood House Early Educationpp V FY21-22 $ 38,449 CDCIP: $ 43,995 benefits. FY20-21 $ - MAYOR: $ 43,995 FY19-20 $ 36,867 COUNCIL: $ 43,995 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Expand access to early childhood FY18-19 $ 33,858 education to setthe stagefor academic achievement,social 5 YR TOTAL $ 149,174 development,and change the cycle of poverty. 7 Odyssey House The Adult Mental Health Program(AMHP)serves adults with a primary New REQUEST: $ 55,060 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: severe mental illness diagnosis.AMHP administers ever level of care, Maximum score:97 73.93 Safety and Trauma Support Services for g V CDCIP: $ - Mental Health Populations including crisis services,case management,wrap-around medical care, MAYOR: $ - psychiatric care,medication-assisted treatment,and housing. COUNCIL: $ - Behavioral Health:Expand treatment options,counseling support, and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis. 8 Salt Lake American Language Interpretation Translation and Guidance, New REQUEST: $ 47,520 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Social Service Facilitators,Survival Resources and Services Facilitation of CDCIP: $ - Maximum score:97 75.26 Access to Survival Resources and Services to refugee community Survivial Services of Refugees MAYOR: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Provide support for programs that reduce COUNCIL: $ - food insecurity forvulnerable population. Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 4 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2023/24 1 1 FUNDING1 1 BY FEDERALREGULATION Category Maximum Allocated Balance 1 1 1', 200,000 1 1 PROJECT '1 DESCRIPTION 1US GRANT AWARDS REQU1 1 1 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED' 9 Salt Lake Donated Dental Services Salaries,supplies,and lab fees for Community Dental Project,to support FY22-23 $ 42,500 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Community Dental Project homeless and low-income individuals with dental services. FY21-22 $ 44,400 REQUEST: $ 55,000 Maximum score:97 94.90 FY20-21 $ 44,000 CDCIP: $ 55,000 FY19-20 $ 48,510 MAYOR: $ 55,000 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Expand supportfor medical and dental care FY18-19 $ 30,000 COUNCIL: $ 55,000 options forthose experiencing homelessness. 5 YR TOTAL $ 209,410 10 Salt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services, One-on-one financial coaching,savings accounts,and debt management for New REQUEST: $ 100,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Inc.dba Neighborworks Salt Lake LMI individuals.The new financial skills and behaviors clients learn through Maximum score:97 69.86 our services,are tools to support clients in decreasing dependency on public Neighborworks Salt Lake Financial assistance,increasing net worth savings and assets,achieving financial self- CDCIP: $ - Counseling sufficiency,and facing the critical need for community resiliency. MAYOR: $ - COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Finanical literacy and Credit help. Applicant also submitted CDBG Housing S7,and HOME S2. 11 South Valley Sanctuary Domestic Violence Case Manager salary,benefits,mileage and client rental FY22-23 $ 40,000 REQUEST: $ 40,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: assistance. Domestic Violence Lase Manager and FY21-22 $ 100,000 CDCIP: $ 30,489 Maximum score:97 79.00 Housing Assistance FY20-21 $ 30,000 MAYOR: $ 30,489 Applicant also submitted HOME ft4. COUNCIL: $ 30,489 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Expand case management support as awayto connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent 5 YR TOTAL $ 170,000 housing and supportive services. 12 Spy Hop Productions Address techonology and ecnomic inequalities by donating computers and New REQUEST: $ 30,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: other devices to low income individuals Spy Hop Tech Liberation Project CDCIP: $ - Maximum score:97 74.36 MAYOR: $ - COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services. 13 The Children's Center This program provides treatment for preschool-aged children,who have been FY22-23 $ 55,000 REQUEST: $ 55,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: the victims of assault or trauma,and who are struggling to succeed in Maximum score:97 81.29 Therapeutic Preschool Program gg g CDCIP: $ 30,489 childcare or preschool.Follow up with intensive group therapy to gain MAYOR: $ 30,489 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Expand access to early childhood resilience and learn essential skills. COUNCIL: $ 30,489 education to set the stage for academic achievement,social development,and change the cycle of poverty. 14 The Inn Between Provides homeless individuals who need hospice or other end of life care and FY22-23 $ REQUEST: $ 95,565 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: temporary medical respite housing for homeless individuals experiencing a Maximum score:97 83.93 End of Life Care and Medical Respite P rY P g P g FY21-22 $ - CDCIP: $ 56,084 medical crisis. FY20-21 $ MAYOR: $ 56,084 FY19-20 $ 45,599 COUNCIL: $ 56,084 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Provide supportfor homeless services FY18-19 $ 45,543 including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency SYRTOTAL $ 91,142 1 overflow operations. Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 5 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2023/24 1 1 FUNDING1 1 BY FEDERALREGULATION Category Maximum Allocated Balance 1 1 1', 200,000 1 1 PROJECT '1 DESCRIPTION 1US GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED' k. 15 The Road Home The housing navigation staff work at four of the resource centers and FY22-23 $ 40,000 REQUEST: $ 50,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: coordinate with other service providers to serve households referred into the Maximum score:97 84.07 Housing Staffing P CDCIP: $ 50,000 program. MAYOR: $ 50,000 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Expand case management support asaway to COUNCIL: $ 50,000 connectthoseexperiencinghomelessnesswithpermanent Applicant also submitted CDBG Public Services#16,ESG Part 2#3,and HOME housing and supportive services. #5. 16 The Road Home Operational support for the Gail Miller Resource Center and overflow shelter FY22-23 $ - REQUEST: $ 110,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: located in SLC,such as the St.Vincent de Paul winter overflow site. 81.86 Homeless Resource Centers FY21-22 $ 72,000 CDCIP: $ 55,450 FY20-21 $ - MAYOR: $ 55,450 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Expand case management support as a way to Applicant also submitted CDBG Public Services#15,ESG Part 2#3,and HOME connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent #5. FY19-20 $ - COUNCIL: $ 55,450 housing and supportive services. FY18-19 $ 5 YR TOTAL $ 72,000 17 United Way of Salt Lake Provide customer-centric referral connection services to SLC residents in New REQUEST: $ 175,484 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: need that include warm transfers,follow-up services,and client satisfaction Maximum score:97 73.43 Utah 211 Resource Navigation for SLC P CDCIP: $ - Residents surveys.Support SLC's most vulnerable and at-risk residents in resource MAYOR: $ - connection and information decision-making in the top SLC needs areas, including but not limited to housing/shelter,food,healthcare,and utility COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:provide housing and essential supportive servicesto assistance.Act as a trusted point of connection for the SLC community, persons with HIV/AIDS regardless of needs to be met. 18 Wasatch Community Gardens Provides farm-based employment,work readiness training,job placement New REQUEST: $ 61,604 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: assistance,and mentorin for women facing and/or experiencing Maximum score:97 78.29 Green Team Program g g P g CDCIP: $ 30,489 homelessness.Request for One-time expenses related to farm move MAYOR: $ 30,489 including partial soil removal and disposal,Geotextile layer,Importing clean soil,and palletizing and moving supplies. COUNCIL: $ 30,489 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Providejob training/vocational training programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations. 19 Wasatch Homeless Health Care,Inc.dba Address social determinatnes of health including acces to health care and New REQUEST: $ 126,685 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Fourth Street Clinic housing stability.Note the new program would provide behavioral health Maximum score:97 81.60 Health and Housing Transtion Team support at permanent supportive housing developments in the City including CDCIP: $ 40,456 the Magnolia,Palmer Court,and Wendell Apartments. MAYOR: $ 40,456 COUNCIL: $ 40,456 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Expand Access to health care and housing stability. Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 6 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2023/24 2023-2024 Funding Available: $ 5,597,763 FUNDING1 1 BY FEDERALREGULATION Category Maximum Allocated Balance 1 1 1', 200,000 1 1 PROJECT '• DESCRIPTION PREVIOUSAWARDS •U EST/RECOMM ENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED' 20 YWCA Utah YWCA's secure,emergency shelter offers 36 onsite and 4 overflow units to FY22-23 $ 37,778 REQUEST: $ 89,100 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: victims left homeless due to domestic violence.Provide salary and benefits Maximum score:97 84.48 Women in Jeopardy Program ry FY21-22 $ 33,900 CDCIP: $ 56,249 for essential shelter staffing infrastructure. FY20-21 $ 58,285 MAYOR: $ 56,249 FY19-20 $ 58,285 COUNCIL: $ 56,249 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless services:Provide supportfor homeless services FY18-19 $ 51,260 including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency 5 YR TOTAL $ 239,508 overflow operations. REQUEST: $ 1,392,925 41.0% Note:15%is the maximum amount allowed per HUD regulations PUBLIC SERVICES TOTAL CDCIP: $ 659,664 15.0% MAYOR: $ 659,664 15.0% COUNCIL: $ 659,664 15.0% FUND AVAILABILITY 23-24 GRANT AWARD: 3,397,763 FUND REQUEST Anticipated Program Income: $ 1,000,000 Housing $ 3,170,292 Reallocated CDBG: $ 1,200,000 Neighborhood Improvements:Transp&ED $ 800,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $ 5,597,763 Public Services $ 1,392,925 Administration $ 679,552 FUNDS ALLOCATED TOTAL FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 6,042,769 CDCIP: $ 5,597,763 MAYOR: $ 5,597,763 CDCIP Board Recommendations: Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation COUNCIL: $ 5,597,763 Maximize Admin at 20%of CDBG award,and increase all Housig and Neighborhood projects except ASSIST and NBIP proportionally based on their percentage of total award and weighted by score.Do not exceed 15%Public Services Cap,and increase PS projects proportionally If an increase in funding: without going above the requested funding amount. Maximize Admin at 20%of CDBG award,and decrease from ASSIST and NBIP in equal amounts down to$800,000 each,and then reduce proportionally across all Housing and Neighborhood AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION Improvement projects based on their percentage of total award and weighted by score.Do not exceed 15%Public Service Cap,and decrease PS projects proportionally without going below the $ If adecreaseinfundIng: $30,000fundingfloor. CDCIP: Administration Analysis: MAYOR: $ COUNCIL: $ Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 7 SALT LAKE CITY ESG PROGRAM: FUNDING / 2023/2024 StreetPart 1 Funding: Outreach Emergency Shelter: .I .1 Part 2 Funding:Homelessness Prevention,RRH,H MIS,and Admin: 1: I 1 303,100 PROJECT • DESCRIPTION '1REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 16 PARTI- STREET OUTREACH AND EMERGENCY SHELTER 1 Catholic Community Services Operational support for the Weigand Homeless Resource Center,a day FY22-23 $ - REQUEST: $ 50,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Weigand Homeless Resource Center Client shelter for individuals experiencing homelessness. FY21-22 Maximum score:97 88.00 g $ 41,000 CDCIP: $ 50,000 Intake/Operations FY20-21 $ - MAYOR: $ 50,000 Applicant also submitted CDBG Public Services#1. FY19-20 $ 30,000 COUNCIL: $ 50,000 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Homeless Services:Homeless emergency shelter,resource FY18-19 $ - center,or overflow operations 5 YR TOTAL $ 71,000 2 Family Promise Salt Lake The FPSLfamily shelter program utilizes 12 Salt Lake Valley buildings to FY22-23 $ 30,247 REQUEST: $ 48,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: shelter homeless families.Each shelter location houses 3-4 families at a Maximum score:97 83.86 Community Family Shelter CDCIP: $ 30,408 time for one week at a time. MAYOR: $ 30,408 COUNCIL: $ 30,408 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Homeless Services:Homeless emergency shelter,resource center,or overflow operations 3 First Step House First Step House will provide on-site behavioral health assessment, FY22-23 $ 36,248 REQUEST: $ 61,878 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: referral,and peer support services to individuals at the Men's Homeless Maximum score:97 84.57 Homeless Resource Center Program P PP FY21-22 $ 49,250 CDCIP: $ 40,636 Resource Center. FY20-21 $ 60,000 MAYOR: $ 40,636 Applicant also submitted CDBG Housing#2,CDBG Public Services#2 and FY19-20 $ 50,000 COUNCIL: $ 40,636 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Homeless Services:Homeless emergency shelter,resource #3,and HOME#3. center,or overflow operations 5 YR TOTAL $ 195,498 4 Volunteers of America,Utah Operational and service expenses for the Geraldine E.King Women's FY22-23 $ 65,048 REQUEST: $ 128,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Resource Center. Maximum score:97 82.07 Geraldine King Women's Resource Center FY21-22 $ 30,000 CDCIP: $ 30,408 FY20-21 $ 38,000 MAYOR: $ 30,408 Applicant also submitted ESG Part 1#5,and HOME#7. COUNCIL: $ 30,408 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Homeless Services:Homeless emergency shelter,resource 5 YR TOTAL $ 38,000 center,or overflow operations 5 Volunteers of America,Utah Operational and essential services of the VOA Youth Resource Center, FY22-23 $ 45,249 REQUEST: $ 100,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: which serves homeless and at risk teens age 15-22. Maximum score:97 83.05 Homeless Youth Resource Center g FY21-22 $ 44,000 CDCIP: $ 30,408 FY20-21 $ 46,000 MAYOR: $ 30,408 Applicant also submitted ESG Part 1#4,and HOME#7. FY19-20 $ 44,115 COUNCIL: $ 30,408 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Homeless Services:Homeless emergency shelter,resource FY18-19 $ 60,000 center,or overflow operations 5 YR TOTAL $ 239,364 REQUEST: $ 387,878 127.97% STREET OUTREACH AND EMERGENCY SHELTER TOTAL CDCIP: $ 181,860 60.00%Max 60% MAYOR: $ 181,860 60.00%Max 60% COUNCIL: $ 181,860 60.00%Max 60% *FUNDING FOR PART I CANNOT EXCEED$181,860 Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 8 SALT LAKE CITY ESG PROGRAM: FUNDING / 2023/2024 StreetPart 1 Funding: Outreach Emergency Shelter: .I .1 Part 2 Funding:Homelessness Prevention,RRH,H MIS,and Admin: 1: I 1 303,100 1 • N 1! PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS1 • • 1 1 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN ,Ami z- HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION,RAPID RE-HOUSING,AND HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM(HMIS) 1 Asian Association of Utah Homelessness Prevention Program,including client rental assistance and New $ REQUEST: $ 288,377 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: case management costs. Maximum score:97 81.08 g CDCIP: $ 32,318 Homeless Prevention Program MAYOR: $ 32,318 Housing Programs:Rent assistance in the form of rapid COUNCIL: $ 32,318 Consolidated Plan Objective: rehousing,homeless prevention,and housing stabilization assistance 2 Salt Lake Community Action dba Utah Diversion program support in the form of salaries and operational FY22-23 $ - REQUEST: $ 68,188 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Community Action support. Diversion is a light-touch approach working to find safe, FY21-22 $ 40,000 CDCIP: $ 31,853 Maximum score:97 alternatives for clients to remain in housing ratherthan entering into 79.71 Diversion Program FY20-21 $ 30,000 MAYOR: $ 31,853 shelter. FY19-20 $ 53,000 COUNCIL: $ 31,853 Consolidated Plan Objective: Housing Programs:Rent assistance in the form of rapid Applicant also submitted HOME#6 and HOPWA#4. FY18-19 $ - rehousing,homeless prevention,and housing stabilization 5YRTOTAL $ 123,000 assistance 3 The Road Home Salary support for case managers in The Road Home's Rapid Re-housing FY22-23 $ 51,816 REQUEST: $ 128,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Program working with participants,combined with short-term rental Maximum score:97 82.86 Rapid Re-Housing Program g g P P FY21-22 $ - CDCIP: $ 34,337 assistance. FY20-21 $ 40,765 MAYOR: $ 34,337 Applicant also submitted CDBG Public Services#15 and#16,and HOME FY19-20 $ 84,077 COUNCIL: $ 34,337 Consolidated Plan Objective: Housing Programs:Rent assistance in the form of rapid #5. FY18-19 $ 85,382 rehousing,homeless prevention,and housing stabilization SYRTOTAL $ 262,040 assistance REQUEST: $ 484,565 HOMELESS PREVENTION&RAPID REHOUSING&HMIS TOTAL CDCIP: $ 98,508MAYOR: $ 98,508 COUNCIL: $ 98,508 Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 9 SALT LAKE CITY ESG PROGRAM: FUNDING / 2023/2024 StreetPart 1 Funding: Outreach - - - .I .1 Part 2 Funding:Homelessness Prevention,RRH,H MIS,and Admin: 1: I 1 303,100 PROJECTLICANT • DESCRIPTION PREVIOUSAWARDS / • 1 1 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN ADMINISTRATION 1 Salt Lake City Corporation To provide management,oversight,and monitoring of the ESG program. FY22-23 $ 22,510 REQUEST: $ 22,732 7.5% Program Administration Administration:7.5%of ESG allocation. FY21-22 $ 22,630 CDCIP: $ 22,732 7.5% FY20-21 $ 22,446 MAYOR: $ 22,732 7.5% FY19-20 $ 21,843 COUNCIL: $ 22,732 7.5% FY18-19 $ 21,659 5 YR TOTAL $ 111,088 REQUEST: $ 895,175 CDCIP: $ 303,100 HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION,RAPID RE-HOUSING,HMIS,AND ADMINISTRATION MAYOR: $ 303,100 COUNCIL: $ 303,100 Requested Funds $ 895,175 AVAILABLE TO AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION: FUNDS ALLOCATED: ALLOCATE: 23-24 GRANT AWARD: $ 303,100 CDCIP BOARD: $ 303,100 $ REALLOCATION: $ - MAYOR: $ 303,100 $ TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $ 303,100 COUNCIL: $ 303,100 $ CDCIP Board Recommendation: Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation Maximize Admin at 7.5%of ESG award,not exceeding Part 1 Cap, increase proportionally across all projects and without going about If an increase in funding maximum request Maximize Admin at 7.5%of ESG award,not exceeding Part 1 Cap, and decrease proportionally across all projects and without going If a decrease in funding below the$30,000 funding floor Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page to SALT LAKE CITY HOME PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2023/2024 Final 2023-2024 Funding Available: $ 2,023,661 Available to Allocate $ - I :JL APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME """'DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/ A 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN RECOMMENDED 1 Community Development Corporation of Direct aid in the form of grants/loans not to exceed$39,000 each to first- FY22-23 $ 200,000 REQUEST: $ 374,800 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Utah time LMI home buyers in Salt Lake City for down payment assistance. FY21-22 75.79 y y p y $ 200,000 CDCIP: $ 213,950 Maximum score: Down Payment Assistance FY20-21 $ 200,000 MAYOR: $ 213,950 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing programs that provide access FY19-20 $ 200,000 COUNCIL: $ 213,950 to home ownership via down payment assistance and/or FY18-19 $ 200,000 housing subsidy and/or financing. 5 YR TOTAL $ 1,000,000 2 Neighborworks Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition,new FY22-23 $ 208,661 REQUEST: $ 420,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: construction,and rehabilitation of existing housing. CDCIP: $ - Maximum score:97 72.57 MAYOR: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing:Support housing programs that address needs of Applicant also submitted CDBG Housing#7 and CDBG Public Services#10. COUNCIL: $ - aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. 3 First Step House Funds will be used to rehabilitate the Stratford Apartments which will be New REQUEST: $ 500,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: used for low income individuals CDCIP: $ 408,320 Maximum score:97 85.69 Stratford Apartments MAYOR: $ 408,320 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing development that increases Applicant also submitted CDBG Housing#2,CDBG Public Services#2 and#3, COUNCIL: $ 408,320 the nummber of units available for income eligible and ESG Part 1#3. residents(Acquistion,New Construction). 4 South Valley Sanctuary Tenant Based Rental Assistance for survivors of domestic violence. FY22-23 $ 138,500 REQUEST: $ 138,500 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: CDCIP: $ 138,431 Maximum score:97 84.14 Domestic Violence Survivor Housing Applicant also submitted CDBG Public Services#11. MAYOR: $ 138,431 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing programs that provide Assistance COUNCIL: $ 138,431 applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, homeless prevention,and housing stabilization assistance. 5 The Road Home Tenant Based Rental Assistance for eligible clients in The Road Home's FY22-23 $ 200,000 REQUEST: $ 350,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Rapid Re-housing Program. FY21-22 $ 200,000 CDCIP: $ 349,839 Maximum score:97 77.74 FY20-21 $ 200,000 MAYOR: $ 349,839 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing programs that provide Applicant also submitted CDBG Public Services#15 and#16,and ESG Part 2 FY19-20 $ 200,000 COUNCIL: $ 349,839 applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, #3. FY18-19 $ 200,000 homeless prevention,and housing stabilization assistance. 5 YR TOTAL $ 1,000,000 6 Utah Community Action Operational support,direct client rental assistance through Tenant Based FY22-23 $ 167,669 REQUEST: $ 210,337 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Rental Assistance. FY21-22 $ 167,669 CDCIP: $ 208,757 Maximum score:97 83.OS FY20-21 $ 70,000 MAYOR: $ 208,757 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing programs that provide Applicant also submitted ESG Part 2#2,and HOPWA#4. FY19-20 $ 70,000 COUNCIL: $ 208,757 applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, FY18-19 $ 70,000 homeless prevention,and housing stabilization assistance. 5 YR TOTAL $ 545,338 7 Volunteers of America,Utah Tenant Based Rental Assistance for eligible clients at the Youth Resource New REQUEST: $ 100,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Homeless Youth Resource Center Teant Center(Pilot) CDCIP: $ 99,372 Maximum score:97 83.07 Based Rental Assistance Program MAYOR: $ 99,372 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing programs that provide Applicant also submitted ESG Part 1#4 and#5. COUNCIL: $ 99,372 applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, homeless prevention,and housing stabilization assistance. Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 11 SALT LAKE CITY HOME PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2023/2024 Final 2023-2024 Funding Available: $ 2,023,661 Available to Allocate $ APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/ 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLANl RECOMMENDED 8 Salt Lake City Corporation Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition,new New REQUEST: $ 600,000 Salt Lake City Homebuyer Program construction,and rehabilitation of existing housing. CDCIP: $ 349,076 76.79 MAYOR: $ 349,076 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing development that increases The Division also submitted a similar application for CDBG Housing#6. COUNCIL: $ 349,076 the number of units available for income eligible residents (Acquistion,New Construction). 9 Salt Lake City Corporation Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition,new FY22-23 $ 153,718 REQUEST: $ 153,550 N/A Community Housing Development construction,and rehabilitation of existing housing.Note that HUD requires FY21-22 $ 984,634 CDCIP: $ 153,550 Organization Set Aside 15%of the annual HOME grant award to be reserved for Community FY20-21 $ 1,066,667 MAYOR: $ 153,550 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing development that increases Housing Development Organizations or CHDOs. FY19-20 $ 939,266 COUNCIL: $ 153,550 the number of units available for income eligible residents FY18-19 $ 1,061,368 (Acquistion,New Construction). 5 YR TOTAL $ 4,205,653 10 Salt Lake City Corporation Funding to administer the HOME program(10%of the total HOME FY22-23 $ 97,486 REQUEST: $ 102,366 Program Administration allocation). FY21-22 $ 97,486 CDCIP: $ 102,366 FY20-21 $ 95,750 MAYOR: $ 102,366 FY19-20 $ 88,507 COUNCIL: $ 102,366 FY18-19 $ 99,994 10%of Home Allocation 5 YR TOTAL $ 479,223 10%of HOME Award: $ 102,366.10 REQUEST: $ 2,949,553 CDCIP: $ 2,023,661 TOTAL MAYOR: $ 2,023,661 COUNCIL: $ 2,023,661 FUND AVAILABILITY: AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION: 23-24 GRANT AWARD: $ 1,023,661 CDCIP ADVISORY BOARD: $ - ANTICIPATED PROGRAM INCOME: $ 800,000 MAYOR: $ - REALLOCATION: $ 200,000.00 COUNCIL: $ TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $ 2,023,661 CDCIP Board Recommendation:Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation Maximize Admin at 10%of HOME award,set aside 15%for CHDO requirement,and increase proportionally across all funded projects If on increase in funding based on the percentage of the total award and weighted by score Maximize Admin at 10%of HOME award,set aside 15%for CHDO requirement,and decrease proportionally across all funded projects If a decrease in funding based on the percentage of the total award and weighted by score Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 12 ALT LAKE CITY HOPWA PROGRAM Final t i1,012,841 Moak Available to Allocate $ - 19 ' '• r rPROJECT 1 • • REQUEST/ 1 1 • CONSOLIDATED' •rRECMMENDED LAN 1 Housing Connect Provides Tenant Based Rental Assistance to persons with HIV/AIDS FY22-23 $ 519,185 REQUEST: $ 584,684 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Tenant Based Rental Assistance FY21-22 $ 489,332 CDCIP $ 629,102 Maximum score:97 80.33 FY20-21 $ 510,797 MAYOR: $ 629,102 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Support rent assistance programs to FY19-20 $ 438,020 COUNCIL: $ 629,102 emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and end homelessness. FY18-19 $ 321,015 5YRTOTAL $ 2,278,349 2 Utah AIDS Foundation Provides Supportive Services to persons with HIV/AIDS FY22-23 $ 70,000 REQUEST: $ 70,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: HOPWA Supportive Services FY21-22 $ 30,000 CDCIP $ 75,319 Maximum score:97 88.50 FY20-21 $ 30,000 MAYOR: $ 75,319 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Support rent assistance programs to FY19-20 $ 30,000 COUNCIL: $ 75,319 emphasize stable housing as a primary strategyto prevent and FY18-19 $ 30,000 end homelessness. 5 YR TOTAL $ 190,000 3 Utah AIDS Foundation Provides Mental Health Services to persons with HIV/AIDS FY22-23 $ 100,000 REQUEST: $ 100,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Mental Health Services FY21-22 $ 50,000 CDCIP $ 107,600 Maximum score:97 87.17 FY20-21 $ - MAYOR: $ 107,600 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Behavioral Health:Support programsthat provide connection to FY19-20 $ - COUNCIL: $ 107,600 permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs. FY18-19 $ 5 YR TOTAL $ 150,000 4 Utah Community Action Provides short term rental,mortgage,and/or utilities assistance,permanent FY22-23 $ 195,736 REQUEST: $ 160,639 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: housing placement,and supportive services to persons with HIV/AIDS. Maximum score:97 78.57 Short-term Rental,Mortgage and Utility g P PP P FY21-22 $ 85,099 CDCIP $ 172,835 Assistance,Permanent Housing Placement FY20-21 $ 162,044 MAYOR: $ 172,835 Consolidated Plan Goal Strate Housing Programs:Support rent assistance programs to Applicant also submitted ESG Part 2#2,and HOME#6. / gy g g pp p g and Supportive Services pp FY19-20 $ 127,099 COUNCIL: $ 172,835 emphasize stable housing as a primary strategyto prevent and end homelessness. FY18-19 $ 142,501 5 YR TOTAL Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 13 LAKE CITY HOPWA PROGRAM ,gUNDING LOG 2023/2024 "On Final i1,012,841 Moak Available to Allocate $ - 19 r '1lqr '1 1 1 REQUEST/ 1 1 ICONSOLIDATED' rRECOMMENDED 5 Salt Lake City Corporation To provide management,oversight,and monitoring of the HOPWA program. FY22-23 $ 25,205 REQUEST: $ 27,985 Program Administration FY21-22 $ 18,026 CDCIP $ 27,985 FY20-21 $ 16,003 MAYOR: $ 27,985 FY19-20 $ 14,166 COUNCIL: $ 27,985 FY18-19 $ 12,505 5YRTOTAL $ 85,905 3%ofHOPWAAward: REQUEST: $ 943,308 CDCIP ADVISORY BOARD: $ 1,012,841 TOTAL MAYOR: $ 1,012,841 COUNCIL: $ 1,012,841 FUND AVAILABILITY: AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION: 2023-2024 GRANT AWARD: $ 932,841 CDCIP ADVISORY BOARD: $ REALLOCATION: $ 80,000 MAYOR: $ - TOTALFUNDSAVAILABLE: $ 1,012,841 COUNCIL: $ CDCIP Board Recommendation:Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation Maximize Admin at 3%of HOPWA award,fund Housing Connect to their full amount,then fund UCA to their full amount.If there is funding above this,then award funding proportionally across all 4 programs If an increase If a decrease Maximize Admin at 3%of HOPWA award,then reduce funding proportionally by percentage,but weighted by score. Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 14 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan Goals and Strategies Goals Strategies 1.Support housing programs that address the needs of aging housing stock through targeted rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within the neighborhoods 2.Support affordable housing development that increases the number and types of units available for qualified Housing:Provide expanded housing options for all economic and residents demographic segments of Salt Lake City's population while diversifying 3.Support programs that provide access to home ownership housing stock within neighborhoods 4.Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and/or end homelessness 5.Support programs that provide connection to permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs 6.Provide housing and essential supportive services to persons with HIV AIDS i.Within eligible target areas,improve bus stop amenities as a way to encourage the accessibility of public transit Transportation:Promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal and enhance the experience of public transit 2.Within eligible target areas,expand and support the installation of bike racks,stations,and amenities as a way transportation options to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation 3. Support access to transportation,prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations 1. Support job training and vocational rehabilitation programs that increase economic mobility 2. Improve visual and physical appearance of deteriorating commercial buildings-limited to CDBG Target Area 3. Provide economic development support for microenterprise businesses Community Resiliency:Provide tools to increase economic and/or 4. Direct financial assistance to for-profit businesses housing stability 5. Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement,social development, and change the cycle of poverty 6. Promote digital inclusion through access to digital communication technologies and the internet 7. Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population 1.Expand support for medical and dental care options for those experiencing homelessness 2.Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency Homeless Services:Expand access to supportive programs that help Overflow Operations ensure homelessness is rare,brief and non-reoccurring 3•Provide support for programs undertaking outreach services to address the needs of those living an unsheltered life 4.Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and su portive services Behavioral Health:Provide support for low income and vulnerable 1.Expand treatment options,counseling support,and case management for those experiencing behavioral health populations experiencing behavioral health concerns such as substance abuse disorders and mental health challenges crisis Note:language in BLUE is additional information added by Council staff Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 15 COUNCIL FUNDING CONTINGENCIES Grant If MORE Funding Available If LESS Funding Available Maximize#i Administration at 2o%and increase all Housing Keep#i Administration maximized at 20%and decrease from category projects except#i ASSIST and Neighborhood Housing#1 ASSIST and Neighborhood Improvement#1 Improvement category projects except#1 Neighborhood Neighborhood Business(Facade)Improvement Program in Business(Facade)Improvement Program proportionally based equal amounts down to$800,000 each.Then reduce on their percentage of total award and weighted by score.Do proportionally across all Housing and Neighborhood CDBG not exceed 15%Public Services cap,and increase Public Improvement category projects based on their percentage of Services projects proportionally without going above the total award and weighted by score.Do not exceed 15%Public requested funding amount. Service cap,and decrease Public Services projects proportionally without going below the$30,000 funding floor. Maximize#r Administration at 7.5%and,not exceeding Part i Keep#r Administration maximized at 7.5%and,not exceeding cap,increase proportionally across all projects without going Part r cap,decrease proportionally across all projects without ESG above the maximum request. going below the$30,000 funding floor. Maximize#10 Administration at io%,set aside 15%for the Keep#10 Administration maximized at io%,set aside 15%for Community Housing Development Organization requirement, the Community Housing Development Organization HOME and increase proportionally across all funded project based on requirement,and decrease proportionally across all funded the percentage of the total award and weighted by score. project based on the percentage of the total award and weighted by score. Maximize#5 Administration at 3%,and fund#r Housing Keep#5 Administration maximized at 3%and reduce funding Connect to their full amount,then fund#4 Utah Community proportionally by percentage but weighted by score. HOPWA Action to their full amount.If there is funding above this,then award funding proportionally across all four programs. Last Updated March 20,2023 Attachment 2-FY2023-2024 Annual HUD Grants Funding Log Page 16 Legend Target Area Option 7 ® SLC Target Area xl� Salt Lake City Boundary Percent Under 80% AMI N _ 50% -60% W6thN 60.01% -70% oo E 3rd N 70.01% -80% n m 80.01% -90% u 90.01% - 100% 0 M M W 4th S 400 S T�r w o o m U) 1300 S 0 v m W 2100 S South Salt Lake j Salt Lake C S•urce:Esri,DigitalGlobe,GeoEye, hics,-CNES/Airbus IDS,USDA.USES,AeroGRID,IGN,and south salt Lake thte GIS User Community ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor �' y and NEIGHBORHOODS Q' == Blake Thomas cc Director Cl CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Li;PA( ,=02311:10M77 Date Received: 03/07/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Office Date sent to Council: 03/07/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: March 7, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community and Neighborhoods 10�r—T-1— SUBJECT: Appropriation Resolution adopting Funding Allocations for the One-Year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) funding, Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG) funding, HOME Investment Partnerships Program(HOME) funding, and Housing Opportunities for Person With AIDS (HOPWA) funding for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and approval of the signing of Grant Agreements between Salt Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD). STAFF CONTACT: Tony Milner, Director, Housing Stability Division 801-535-6168, tony.milnergslcgov.com Dillon Hase, Community Development Grant Supervisor, Housing Stability Division 801-535-6402, dillon.hase ci,slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Set a schedule for work sessions and required public hearing, and ultimately approve the included resolution adopting funding allocations for the One-Year Action Plan. This will help the Administration ensure compliance with HUD regulations requiring submission of the 2023-2024 One-Year Action Plan(also referred to as the Annual Action Plan) by May 15, 2023. BUDGET IMPACT: No impact to City General Fund. Grant funds will be received from HUD for 2023-2024. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City is an entitlement entity and eligible under Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 24, Part 91, et. al., to receive CDBG funds in the amount of $3,397,763, ESG funds in the amount of$303,100, HOME funds in the amount of$1,023,661, and HOPWA funds in the amount of$932,841from HUD for the 2023-2024 program year. The City's process for allocating these funds includes a competitive application process followed by a thorough review of applications by the Community Development and Capital Improvement Program(CDCIP)Board, a resident advisory board. The CDCIP Board provides funding recommendations that are forwarded to the Mayor for consideration. The Mayor then provides funding recommendations that are forwarded along with the CDCIP Board's recommendations to the City Council. To receive and reallocate these funds to specific subrecipients, the City Council is required to adopt the One-Year Action Plan allocating HUD funds that principally benefit low- to-moderate income (LMI) residents. The One-Year Action Plan must align with the Salt Lake City 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan(Consolidated Plan) as adopted by the City Council and approved by HUD. The City Attorney's Office reviewed the included resolution(Exhibit A: Resolution 2023-2024 Federal Grant Award and One-Year Action Plan Funding Allocations) and approves it as to form. In addition to the annual entitlement award amounts, the City will also reallocate CDBG funds in the amount of$1,200,000, HOME funds in the amount of$200,000, and HOPWA funds in the amount of$80,000. The following table represents the entitlement funding the City will receive for the 2023-2024 program year, as published by HUD on February 27, 2023. Entitlement Funding Grant 11 Amount Community Development Block Grant $3,397,763 Emergency Solutions Grant $303,100 HOME Investment Partnerships Program $1,023,661 Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS $932,841 The following table represents the dollar amounts for funds that have been recaptured from previous program years and are available for reallocation for the 2023-2024 program year. These are funds that were positively identified as available for recapture, because of agreement expiration or project completion, at the end of the most recently closed HUD program year. Any recaptured funds retain the federal requirements, eligibility criteria and limitations of the original federal funding source. Also of note, the 20%Administrative and Planning cap and the 15% Public Services cap for CDBG are both hard tied to the HUD program year and do not carry forward. Therefore, any recaptured CDBG funding may not be allocated to administration or public services programs, rather they would only be available to use for the Housing and Neighborhood Improvements category as defined within the Consolidated Plan. Reallocated Funding rant in Amount Community Development Block Grant $1,200,000 HOME Investment Partnerships Program $200,000 Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS $80,000 In addition to annual entitlement funding and available reallocation funding, there is also anticipated Program Income funding that needs to be allocated to projects and activities for the upcoming 2023-2024 program year. The following table represents the estimated dollar amounts for program income funding, that will be received during the program year and will be available for allocation. Program Income generated with HUD funding is required to be expended prior to any entitlement funds being drawn down. This means that, as a best practice, anticipated program income should be allocated for programming at the time of annual entitlement funding, to ensure regulatory compliance. Since program income funding to be allocated is based on estimates of revenue not yet received, it is often necessary to build in contingencies for increases or decreases in funding. Housing Stability staff can provide guidance to the Council in making such determinations and will work with Finance to ensure compliance with City budget processes. Also of note, CDBG program income generated during the program year retains the 20%Administration and Planning cap and the 15%Public Services cap, increasing the funding available to be put towards these categories. While the Administration is not seeking additional Admin. funding, it does present an opportunity for additional funding to be allocated to public services activities. Program Income Funding Grant Amount Community Development Block Grant $1,000,000 HOME Investment Partnership Program $800,000 The following table represent the estimated total funding available, including entitlement funding the City will receive for the 2023-2024 program year, the funds that have been recaptured from previous program years now available for reallocation for the 2023-2024 program year and the program income funding estimated to be received during the 2023-2024 program year. The funding recommendations contained within Exhibit A are based on this amount of total funding availability. Total Funding rant Amount Communi Development Block Grant $5,597,763 Emergency Solutions Grant $303,100 HOME Investment Partnership Program $2,023,661 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS $1,012,841 The CDCIP Board reviewed applications for all four HUD entitlement programs this year; CDBG, ESG, HOME and HOPWA respectively. After thorough review and scoring the board made funding recommendations. Given the timing of the board review and the HUD announcements of final award amounts, the CDCIP Board used an estimated amount of funding for each grant, based upon the grant awards from the prior federal program year. The boards also included contingency recommendations on projects that should receive increases or decreases of funding if the final allocation amounts were different than amounts estimated at the time of the board meetings. The board's recommendations were forwarded to the Mayor for review and consideration. The Board and Mayor's recommendations, as presented to Council, have been adjusted based on those contingency recommendations, after final award amounts from HUD were announced. The 2023-2024 One-Year Action Plan Funding Allocations Log (attached to Exhibit A) for all grants will be attached to the resolution after the City Council has made final funding decisions. One item of note, the Council may remember that there is a 15% Community Housing Development Organization(CHDO) set-aside requirement for the annual HOME entitlement award. This CHDO set-aside is included as part of the funding recommendations provided to Council. A CHDO must fit a certain criterion regarding who serves on their board, the organizational legal status, capacity, and is a private, nonprofit organization. An agency eligible to be qualified as a CHDO must also go through a certification process with the City each year in which they wish to be considered for CHDO set-aside funding. A CHDO set-aside eligible project is one in which there is creation or development of affordable rental or homebuyer housing. Rental assistance, homeowner rehabilitation, and down payment assistance are not an eligible expense under the CHDO set-aside. There were no applications in the FY23-24 requests that would qualify under the CHDO requirements. The Administration proposes that the Housing Stability Division coordinate with RDA for any available CHDO funds to be released as part of their annual NOFA process. PUBLIC PROCESS: Housing Stability combined community engagement efforts with CAN Admin. during the past year, as they worked to gain public input on the upcoming Housing Plan update and there was a significant amount of overlap in the information we were trying to obtain. From August 2022 through November 2022, Housing Stability and CAN Admin. staff conducted a number of public participation events, including a survey to engage members of the public and receive input on how federal funding could be prioritized. The survey was offered in English and in Spanish. During the 2022 calendar year, staff also returned to attending in-person community events. The in-person events were done throughout the City, including Partners in the Park,Utah Support Advocates for Recovery Awareness (USARA) Recovery Day, 9th West Farmers Market and 2 City-hosted pop-up events. Additionally, to hear from vulnerable populations without access to computers, paper versions of the survey were provided to the Homeless Resources Centers, two adult Detox locations, the Homeless Youth Resource Center, the Sorensen Community Center, and two local food banks. A total of 3,829 responses were received. The public was asked to give input on their top priorities of the goals identified in the Consolidated Plan. Priority ranking for each goal of the Consolidated Plan were provided, as follows: • Housing—Build new affordable housing and homeownership for low-income populations. • Transportation—Provide transit passes to low-income populations. • Build Community Resiliency—Early childhood education. • Homeless Services—Homeless Resources Centers operations and emergency shelter. • Behavioral Health—Treatment, counseling, and case management for behavioral health. The CDCIP Board was provided results derived from the community engagement process and considered these priorities and how they align with the goals of the Consolidated Plan when identifying projects to be recommended for the 2023-2024 program year. A General Needs Hearing was held by Housing Stability on November 16, 2022, as a required HUD forum to allow the public an opportunity to voice general ideas or concerns regarding community needs. A total of three (3)public comments were received and were related to strengthening neighborhoods by providing continued assistance for housing preservation and sustainability, including home repairs and aging in place programs, and funding additional mental health services. The comments generated by the hearing provided an opportunity for the CDCIP Board to consider the public's ideas and how these ideas align with the goals of the Consolidated Plan. The ideas presented during a General Needs Hearing are typically discussed during subsequent board meetings to help identify which funding requests would be recommended by the board. The CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA applications were reviewed during nine (9)public meetings by the CDCIP Board between November 14, 2022, and February 13, 2022. Small group meetings with applicants were held on January 30, 2022,preceding a public meeting. CAN and Housing Stability leadership met with Chief of Staff, Rachel Otto, on February 9, 2023, and with Mayor Mendenhall on February 14, 2023, to review the CDCIP board recommendations. The Mayor accepted the recommendations from the CDCIP board. EXHIBIT: A. Resolution 2023-2024 Federal Grant Award and One-Year Action Plan Funding Allocations, attached with 2023-2024 One-Year Action Plan Funding Recommendation Log EXHIBIT A: Resolution 2023-2024 Federal Grant Award and One-Year Action Plan, and 2023-2024 One-Year Action Plan Funding Recommendation Log RESOLUTION NO. OF 2023 A resolution adopting funding allocations for the One-Year Annual Action Plan for 2023-2024 to include U.S. Housing and Urban Development(HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding, Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG) funding, HOME Investment Partnerships Program(HOME) funding, Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) funding. WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation(City) is eligible under Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 24, Part 91, et. al., to receive HUD CDBG funds in the amount of $3,397,763, ESG funds in the amount of$303,100, HOME funds in the amount of$1,023,661, and HOPWA funds in the amount of$932,841, from HUD for the 2023-2024 program year; and WHEREAS, the City will also reallocate from prior program years CDBG funds in the amount of$1,200,000, HOME funds in the amount of$200,000, and HOPWA funds in the amount of$80,000; and WHEREAS, the City will also allocate CDBG program income in the amount of $1,000,000 and HOME program income in the amount of$800,000; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the people of Salt Lake City that the City file an application with HUD for said funds in accordance with 24 CFR Part 91; and WHEREAS, in order to receive said funds, the City is required to adopt a One-Year Annual Action Plan; and WHEREAS, to develop a One-Year Annual Action Plan, a competitive application process was administered to solicit funding requests from non-profit organizations, community organizations, and internal City departments for projects to be funded; and WHEREAS, the Community Development and Capital Improvement Advisory Board and Mayor reviewed applications and made recommendations for funding allocations that were forwarded to the City Council for consideration and approval; and WHEREAS, the public notices, hearings, and other pre-submission requirements as set forth in 24 CFR Part 91 have been accomplished by the City, including but not limited to the following: a public comment period open from March 7, 2023 through April 18, 2023, and a City Council public hearing held on March 21, 2023 to consider the projects to be funded through the 2023-2024 One-Year Annual Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council does now meet on this day of April 18, 2023 to adopt funding allocations for the City's 2023-2024 One-Year Action Plan for CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funds. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1 1. That the City hereby adopts funding allocations as set forth in Exhibit"A" to be incorporated into the 2023-2024 One-Year Annual Action Plan for CDBG, ESG, HOME and HOPWA funds. 2. That the Mayor, as the official representative of Salt Lake City, or her designee, is hereby authorized to submit to HUD the 2023-2024 One-Year Annual Action Plan for CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funds, together with such additional information and certifications as may be required under 24 CFR Part 91. 3. That the Mayor, as the official representative of Salt Lake City, or her designee, is hereby authorized to sign and execute a grant agreement with HUD (the "HUD Grant Agreement")regarding the funds described in the 2023-2024 One-Year Annual Action Plan, and any and all subsequent agreements between the City and other public entities resulting from and consistent with the HUD Grant Agreement, subject to final approval as to form by the City Attorney. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of April 18, 2023. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIR Approved as to form: Kimberly Chytraus Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date: March 6,2023 ATTEST: CITY RECORDER 2 EXHIBIT "A" Funding Allocations for 2023-2024 3 SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM:FUNDING LOG 2023/24 2023-2024 Estimated Available: $ 5,597,763 FUNDING CAPS AS REQUIRED BY FEDERAL REGULATION Category Maximum Allocated Balance 2023-2024Admin(20%): $ 679,552 $ - $ 679,552 2023-2024 Public Services(15%): $ 659,664 $ - $ 659,664 2023-2024 Housing&Neighborhood Improvements: $ 4,258,547 $ $ 4,258,547 APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN %OF GRANT AWARD ADMINISTRATIONCITY 1 Housing Stability Division/Finance/ Funding for salaries and operational expenses of Housing Stability,Finance, FY22-23 $ 710,934 REQUEST: $ 679,552 Attorney's Office and the Attorney's Office to administer and monitor the federal grants and FY21-22 $ 701,832 CDCIP: $ 679,552 to conduct the community processes. FY20-21 $ 701,833 MAYOR: $ 679,552 NOTE:In prior years,these were separate budget line items,but they have FY19-20 $ 686,791 COUNCIL: $ - been included as one request for FY23/24 to allow for greater flexabilityto FY18-19 $ 705,436 utilized these Admin.funds between the Departments. 5 YR TOTAL $ 3,506,826 REQUEST: $ 679,552 20.0% Note:20%is the maximum amount allowed.Will auto adjust to 20%when SLC receives HUD award CDCIP: $ 679,552 20.0% CITY ADMINISTRATION TOTAL MAYOR: $ 679,552 20.0% COUNCIL: $ - 0.0% APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN %OF GRANT AWARD 1 ASSIST,Inc. Supporting salaries,operational,and rehabilitation activities including FY22-23 $ 700,000.00 REQUEST: $ 800,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Emergency Home Repair&Accessibility and plumbing,heating&electrical,radon testing/mitigation,roof repair, FY21-22 $ 700,000.00 CDCIP: $ 926,766 Maximum score:97 81.14 Community Design accessibility ramps,and accessibility design projects,etc. FY20-21 $ 391,373.00 MAYOR: $ 926,766 FY19-20 $ 391,000.00 COUNCIL: Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Support housing programs that address needs of aging FY18-19 $ 320,000.00 housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. 5 YR TOTAL $ 2,502,373.00 2 First Step House Funds for critical rehabilitation at 4 recovery residences(transitional housing)FY22-23 $ 322,000.00 REQUEST: $ 374,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Recovery Residence Rehabilitation for sober living. CDCIP: $ 379,703 Maximum score:97 73.29 MAYOR: $ 379,703 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Support housing programs that address needs of aging COUNCIL: $ - housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. CDBG Page 1 3 International Center for Appropriate and Rehabilitation and energy efficiency upgrades for Trolley Lane Apartments,a FY22-23 $ 300,000 REQUEST: $ 455,792 Combined Ad min&CDCIP Score: Sustainable Technology(ICAST) 17 unit low income housing facility located at 518 E 600 S. CDCIP: $ 462,389 Maximum score:97 69.57 Rehabilitating and Decarbonizing Trolley Lane MAYOR: $ 462,389 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Support housing programs that address needs of aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. 4 Salt Lake City-Housing Stability Division Salaries and operational support for the Housing Rehabilitation and Target FY22-23 $ 500,000 REQUEST: $ 700,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Repair programs that provide home repair services that address health, Maximum score:97 75.71 FY21-22 $ 600,000 CDCIP: $ 711,027 safety,and structural issues for low income homeowners. Home Rehabilitation&Targeted Repair FY20-21 $ 485,600 MAYOR: $ 711,027 Program FY19-20 $ 439,873 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Support programs that provide access to home FY18-19 $ 577,542 ownership via down payment assistance,and/or housing subsidy, and/or financing. 5 YR TOTAL $ 2,603,015 5 Salt Lake City-Housing Stability Division Targeting qualifying seniors and persons with disabilities to provide small FY22-23 $ 30,000 REQUEST: $ 40,500 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: dollar value services for home improvement and service or repair. Maximum score:97 76.14 FY21-22 $ 60,000 CDCIP: $ 41,142 Salt Lake City Small Repair Program FY20-21 $ 60,000 MAYOR: $ 41,142 FY19-20 $ - COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Expand housing supportfor aging resident that ensure FY18-19 $ - access to continued stable housing. 5 Salt Lake City-Housing Stability Division Community Land Trust program.Provides low to moderate income FY22-23 $ REQUEST: $ 400,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: homebuyers the opportunity to purchase a home by removing the cost of FY21-22 $ - CDCIP: $ 406,253 Maximum score:97 75.14 Shared Equity Program the land.The resident will purchase the home/land improvements.Salt Lake FY20-21 $ 250,000 MAYOR: $ 406,253 City retains ownership of the land to ensure future affordability. FY19-20 $ - COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Support programs that provide access to home FY18-19 $ - ownership via down payment assistance,and/or housing subsidy, and/or financing. 6 Neighborworks of Salt Lake Program to provide assistance to low to moderate-income(LMI)residents FY22-23 $ 196,837 REQUEST: $ 400,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: through home rehabilitations and down payments CDCIP: 406,267 Maximum score:97 75.29 $ Home Rehabilitation&Improvement MAYOR: $ 406,267 COUNCIL: Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Support housing programs that address needs of aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. REQUEST: $ 3,170,292 56.6% HOUSING TOTAL CDCIP: $ 3,333,547 59.6% MAYOR: $ 3,333,547 59.6% COUNCIL: $ - 0.00% NEIGHBORHOOD 'a TRANSPORTATION a a DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020.2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN %OF GRANT AWARD 1 Salt Lake City-Housing Stability Division Provide grant money to businesses for facade improvements,focusing on FY22-23 $ 650,000 REQUEST: $ 800,000 Combined Ad min&CDCIP Score: F areas.small businesses and target Maximum score:97 80.43 Neighborhood Business Improvement g Y21-22 $ 502,000 CDCIP: $ 925,000 Program(NBIP) FY20-21 $ 425,883 MAYOR: $ - FY19-20 $ 319,642 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Economic Development efforts via FY18-19 $ 425,000 supporting the improvement and visibility of small businesses through facade improvement programs. 5 YR TOTAL $ 2,322,525 REQUEST: $ 800,000 14.3% NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS:TRANSPORTATION&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFASTRUCTURE TOTAL CDCIP: $ 925,000 16.5% MAYOR: $ 925,000 16.5% COUNCIL: $ - 0.0% CDBG Page 2 PUBLIC SERVICES APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020.2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN %OF GRANT AWARD 1 Catholic Community Services of Utah Provide case management services to individuals experiencing homelessness FY22-23 $ 35,000 REQUEST: $ 50,000 Combined Ad min&CDCIP Score: at the Weigand Homeless Resource Center. Maximum score:97 88.23 Case Manager-Weigand Homeless g FY21-22 $ - CDCIP: $ 41,090 Resource Center FY20-21 $ MAYOR: $ 41,090 FY19-20 $ - COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Expand case management support as a wayto connect those experiencing homelessness with FY18-19 $ - permanent housingand supportive services 5 YR TOTAL $ 35,000 2 First Step House Provide supportive employment services to high-risk,high-need individuals in FY22-23 $ 30,299 REQUEST: $ 56,492 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: our community caught in the cycles of relapse,mental illness,incarceration, Maximum score:97 85.29 Employment Preparation and Placement y g y P FY21-22 $ 41,700 CDCIP: $ 56,492 (EPP)Program homelessness,and unemployment. FY20-21 $ 47,000 MAYOR: $ 56,492 FY19-20 $ 30,000 COUNCIL: Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Providejob training/vocational training FY18-19 programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations. 5 YR TOTAL $ 148,999 3 First Step House Salaries and administrative costs for Peer Support Services(PSS)Program FY22-23 $ 30,000 REQUEST: $ 53,406 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Peer Support Services which provides peer-based supportive services,delivered by certified Peer Maximum score:97 84.86 pp FY21-22 $ 48,000 CDCIP: $ 52,892 SupportSpecialists. FY20-21 $ 50,000 MAYOR: $ 52,892 FY19-20 $ 38,806 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Behavioral Health:Expand treatment options,counseling FY18-19 $ 30,000 support,and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis. 5 YR TOTAL $ 196,806 4 International Rescue Committee Funds will facilitate Digital Inclusion staff to support refugee and other new FY22-23 $ 40,000 REQUEST: $ 60,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Americans access/learn digital technology skills,critical to improving their Maximum score:97 78.43 Digital Skills&Education Access to Build FY21-22 $ 54,400 CDCIP: $ 30,489 Resiliency Refugees and New Americans economic and housing stability. FY20-21 $ MAYOR: $ 30,489 FY19-20 $ 44,629 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Promote digital inclusion through access FY18-19 to digital communication technologies and the internet. 5 YR TOTAL $ 139,029 5 Legal Aid Society of Salt Lake Funds will be used for the Domestic Violence Victim Assitance Program to New REQUEST: $ 30,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: provide free legal representation to victims of domestic violence,regardless Maximum score:97 80.57 Domestic Violence Victim Assistance CDCIP: $ 30,000 of their income,to obtain protective orders and civil stalking injunctions-- MAYOR: $ 30,000 directly addresses the problem by seeking civil protective orders and representing clients in court against perpetrators.The Bridge Gap program COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Expand help to those in need of legal enables victims of domestic violence with a protective order to obtain representation who are in dangerous situation. expedited assistance with a divorce or parentage(custody)case. 6 Neighborhood House Association Assistance for families with childcare as they search for and maintain FY22-23 $ 40,000 REQUEST: $ 52,009 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: employment.Funds will support early education teacher salaries and Maximum score:97 82.74 Neighborhood House Early Education FY21-22 $ 38,449 CDCIP: $ 43,995 benefits. FY20-21 $ - MAYOR: $ 43,995 FY19-20 $ 36,867 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Expand accessto early childhood FY18-19 $ 33,858 education to setthe stage for academic achievement,social development,and change the cycle of poverty. 5 YR TOTAL $ 149,174 7 Odyssey House DescriptionThe Adult Mental Health Program(AMHP)serves adults with a New REQUEST: $ 55,060 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: primary severe mental illness diagnosis.AMHP administers every level of Maximum score:97 73.93 Safety and Trauma Support Services for CDCIP: $ - Mental Health Populations care,including crisis services,case management,wrap-around medical care, MAYOR: $ psychiatric care,medication-assisted treatment,and housing.We are asking for funding to support the training staff in the Mandt System(MS)and to COUNCIL: $ - Behavioral Health:Expand treatment options,counseling begin Resilience Development Outings(RDO)for our clients. support,and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis. CDBG Page 3 8 Salt Lake American Language Interpretation Translation and Guidance, New REQUEST: $ 47,520 Combined Ad min&CDCIP Score: Social Service Facilitators,Survival Resources and Services Facilitation of CDCIP: - Maximum score:97 7S.26 $ Access to Survival Resources and Services to refugee community Survivial Services of Refugees MAYOR: $ - COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population. 9 Salt Lake Donated Dental Services Salaries,supplies,and lab fees for Community Dental Project,to support FY22-23 $ 42,500 REQUEST: $ 55,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: homeless and low-income individuals with dental services. Maximum score:97 84.90 Community Dental Project FY21-22 $ 44,400 CDCIP: $ 55,000 FY20-21 $ 44,000 MAYOR: $ 55,000 FY19-20 $ 48,510 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Expand supportfor medical and dental care FY18-19 $ 30,000 options forthose experiencing homelessness. 5 YR TOTAL $ 209,410 10 Salt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services, One-on-one financial coaching,savings accounts,and debt management for New REQUEST: $ 100,000 Combined Ad min&CDCIP Score: Inc.dba Neighborworks Salt Lake LMI individuals.The new financial skills and behaviors clients learn through Maximum score:97 our services,are tools to support clients in decreasing dependency on public 69.86 Neighborworks Salt Lake Financial assistance,increasing net worth savings and assets,achieving financial self- CDCIP: $ - Counseling sufficiency,and facing the critical need for community resiliency. MAYOR: $ COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Finanical literacy and Credit help. 11 South Valley Sanctuary Domestic Violence Case Manager salary,benefits,mileage and client rental FY22-23 $ 40,000 REQUEST: $ 40,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: assistance. Maximum score:97 79.00 Domestic Violence Case Manager and FY21-22 $ 100,000 CDCIP: $ 30,489 Housing Assistance FY20-21 $ 30,000 MAYOR: $ 30,489 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services. 5 YR TOTAL $ 170,000 12 Spy Hop Productions Address techonology and ecnomic inequalities by donating computers and New REQUEST: $ 30,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: other devices to low income individuals Maximum score:97 74.36 Spy Hop Tech Liberation Project CDCIP: $ - MAYOR: $ COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services. 13 The Children's Center This program provides treatment for preschool-aged children,who have FY22-23 $ 55,000 REQUEST: $ 55,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Therapeutic Preschool Program been the victims of assault or trauma,and who are struggling to succeed in CDCIP: 30,489 Maximum score:97 81.29 $ childcare or preschool.Follow up with intensive group therapy to gain resilience and learn essential skills. MAYOR: $ 30,489 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Expand access to early childhood COUNCIL: $ - education to setthe stage for academic achievement,social development,and change the cycle of poverty. 14 The Inn Between Provides homeless individuals who need hospice or other end of life care and FY22-23 $ REQUEST: $ 95,565 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: temporary medical respite housing for homeless individuals experiencing a Maximum score:97 83.93 End of Life Care and Medical Respite y p g P g FY21-22 $ - CDCIP: $ 56,084 medical crisis. FY20-21 $ - MAYOR: $ 56,084 FY19-20 $ 45,599 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Provide support for homeless services FY18-19 $ 45,543 including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow operations. 5 YR TOTAL $ 91,142 15 The Road Home The housing navigation staff work at four of the resource centers and FY22-23 $ 40,000 REQUEST: $ 50,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: coordinate with other service providers to serve households referred into the Maximum score:97 84.07 Housing Staffing CDCIP: $ 50,000 program. MAYOR: $ 50,000 Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Expand case management support as a way to COUNCIL: connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services. CDBG Page 4 16 The Road Home Operational support for the Gail Miller Resource Center and overflow shelter New REQUEST: $ 110,000 Combined Ad min&CDCIP Score: located in SLC,such as the St.Vincent de Paul winter overflow site. Maximum score:97 81.86 Homeless Resource Centers CDCIP: $ 55,450 MAYOR: $ 55,450 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services. 17 United Way of Salt Lake Provide customer-centric referral connection services to SLC residents in New REQUEST: $ 175,484 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: need that include warm transfers,follow-up services,and client satisfaction Maximum score:97 73.43 Utah 211 Resource Navigation for SLC CDCIP: $ - Residents surveys.Support SLC's most vulnerable and at-risk residents in resource MAYOR: $ connection and information decision-making in the top SLC needs areas, including but not limited to housing/shelter,food,healthcare,and utility COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Housing:Provide housing and essential supportive services to assistance.Act as a trusted point of connection forthe SLC community, persons with HIV/AIDS regardless of needs to be met. 18 Wasatch Community Gardens Provides farm-based employment,work readiness training,job placement New REQUEST: $ 61,604 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: assistance,and mentoring for women facing and/or experiencing Maximum score:97 78.29 Green Team Program CDCIP: $ 30,489 homelessness.Request for One-time expenses related to farm move including partial soil removal and disposal,Geotextile layer,Importing clean MAYOR: $ 30,489 soil,and palletizing and moving supplies. COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Provide job training/vocational training programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations. 19 Wasatch Homeless Health Care,Inc.dba Address social determinatnes of health including acces to health care and New REQUEST: $ 126,685 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Fourth Street Clinic housing stability. Maximum score:97 81.60 Health and Housing Transtion Team CDCIP: $ 40,456 MAYOR: $ 40,456 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Community Resiliency:Expand Access to health care and housing stability. 20 YWCA Utah YWCA's secure,emergency shelter offers 36 onsite and 4 overflow units to FY22-23 $ 37,778 REQUEST: $ 89,100 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: victims left homeless due to domestic violence. Provide salary and benefits Maximum score:97 84.48 Women in Jeopardy Program ry FY21-22 $ 33,900 CDCIP: $ 56,249 for essential shelter staffing infrastructure. FY20-21 $ 58,285 MAYOR: $ 56,249 FY19-20 $ 58,285 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal&Strategy: Homeless Services:Provide support for homeless services FY18-19 $ 51,260 including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow operations. 5 YR TOTAL $ 239,508 REQUEST: $ 1,392,925 41.0% Note:15%is the maximum amount allowed per HUD regulations PUBLIC SERVICES TOTAL CDCIP: $ 659,664 15.0% MAYOR: $ 659,664 15.0% COUNCIL: $ - 0.0% CDBG Page 5 FUND AVAILABILITY 23-24 GRANT AWARD: FUND REQUEST Anticipated Program Income: $ 1,000,000 Housing $ 3,170,292 Reallocated CDBG: $ 1,200,000 Neighborhood Improvements:Transp&ED $ 800,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $ 5,597,763 Public Services $ 1,392,925 Administration $ 679,552 FU NDS ALLOCATED TOTAL FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 6,042,769 CDCIP: $ 5,597,763 MAYOR: $ 5,597,763 CDCIP Board Recommendations: Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation COUNCIL: $ - Maximize Admin at 20%cf CDBG award,and increase ail Housig and Neighborhood projects except ASSIST and NBIP proportionally based on their percentage of total award and weighted by score.Do not exceed 15%Public Services Cap,and increase PS projects proportionally If an increase in funding: without going above the requested funding amount. Maximize Admin at 20%of CDBG award,and decrease from ASSIST and NBIP in equal amounts down to$800,000 each,and then reduce proportionally across all Housing and Neighborhood AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION Improvement projects based on their percentage of total award and weighted by score.Do not exceed 15%Public Service Cap,and decrease PS projects proportionally without going below $ If a decrease in funding: the$30,000 funding floor. CDCIP: Administration Analysis: MAYOR: $ COUNCIL: $ 5,597,763 CDBG Page 6 SALT LAKE CITY ESG PROGRAM:FUNDING LOG 2023/2024 Part 1 Funding:Street Outreach and Emergency Shelter: $ - Max Allowed for Part 1: $ 1 Part 2 Funding:Homelessness Prevention,RRH,HMIS,and Admin: $ - 2023-2024 Funding Available: $ 303,100 APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED%OF GRANT AWARD 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN STREET OUTREACH r EMERGENCY SHELTER 1 Catholic Community Services Operational support for the Weigand Homeless Resource Center,a day FY22-23 $ - REQUEST: $ 50,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: shelterforindividualsex experiencing homelessness. Maximum score:97 88.00 Weigand Homeless Resource Center Client P g FY21-22 $ 41,000 CDCIP: $ 50,000 Intake/Operations FY20-21 $ - MAYOR: $ 50,000 FY19-20 $ 30,000 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Homeless Services:Homeless emergency shelter,resource FY18-19 $ - center,or overflow operations 5 YR TOTAL $ 71,000 2 Family Promise Salt lake The FPSL family shelter program utilizes 12 Salt Lake Valley buildings to FY22-23 $ 30,247 REQUEST: $ 48,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: shelter homeless families.Each shelter location houses 3-4 families at a Maximum score:97 83.86 Community Family Shelter CDCIP: $ 30,408 time for one week at a time. MAYOR: $ 30,408 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Homeless Services:Homeless emergency shelter,resource center,or overflow operations 3 First Step House First Step House will provide on-site behavioral health assessment, FY22-23 $ 36,248 REQUEST: $ 61,878 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: referral, eersu ortservicestoindividualsattheMen'sHomeless Maximum score:97 84.57 Nameless Resource Center Program P PP FY21-22 $ 49,250 CDCIP: $ 40,636 Resource Center. FY20-21 $ 60,000 MAYOR: $ 40,636 FY19-20 $ 50,000 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Homeless Services:Homeless emergency shelter,resource center,or overflow operations 5 YR TOTAL $ 195,498 4 Volunteers of America,Utah Operational and service expenses for the Geraldine E.King Women's FY22-23 $ 65,048 REQUEST: $ 128,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Resource Center. Maximum score:97 82.07 Geraldine King Women's Resource Center FY21-22 $ 30,000 CDCIP: $ 30,405 FY20-21 $ 38,000 MAYOR: $ 30,408 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Homeless Services:Homeless emergency shelter,resource 5 YR TOTAL $ 38,000 center,or overflow operations 5 Volunteers of America,Utah Operational and essential services of the VOA Youth Resource Center, FY22-23 $ 45,249 REQUEST: $ 100,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: which serves homeless and at risk teens age 15-22. Maximum score:97 83.05 Homeless Youth Resource Center g FY21-22 $ 44,000 CDCIP: $ 30,408 FY20-21 $ 46,000 MAYOR: $ 30,408 FY19-20 $ 44,115 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Homeless Services:Homeless emergency shelter,resource FY18-19 $ 60,000 center,or overflow operations 5 YR TOTAL $ 239,364 REQUEST: $ 387,878 127.97% STREET OUTREACH AND EMERGENCY SHELTER TOTAL CDCIP: $ 181,860 60.00%Max 60% MAYOR: $ 181,860 60.00%Max 60% COUNCIL: $ - 0.00%Max 60% *FUNDING FOR PART 1 CANNOT EXCEED$180,083 HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION,RAPID RE-HOUSING,AND HMIS 1 Asian Association of Utah Salaries and Benefits for 2 Case Managers New $ - REQUEST: $ 288,377 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: CDCIP: $ 32,318 Maximum score:97 81.08 AAU Homeless Prevention of Support for MAYOR: $ 32,318 Housing Programs:Rent assistance in the form of rapid BIPOC Communities COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Objective: rehousing,homeless prevention,and housing stabilization assistance 2 Salt Lake Community Action dba Utah Diversion program support in the form of salaries and operational FY22-23 $ - REQUEST: $ 68,188 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Community Action support.Diversion is a light-touch approach working to find safe, FY21-22 $ 40,000 CDCIP: $ 31,853 Maximum score:97 alternatives for clients to remain in housing rather than entering into 79.71 Diversion Program FY20-21 $ 30,000 MAYOR: $ 31,853 shelter. FY19-20 $ 53,000 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Objective: Housing Programs:Rent assistance in the form of rapid FY18-19 $ - rehousing,homeless prevention,and housing stabilization 5 YR TOTAL $ 123,000 assistance ESG Page 7 3 The Road Home Salary support for case managers in The Road Home's Rapid Re-housing FY22-23 $ 51,816 REQUEST: $ 128,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Program working with participants,combined with short-term rental Maximum score:97 82.86 Rapid Re-Housing Program g g P P FY21-22 $ - CDCIP: $ 34,337 assistance. FY20-21 $ 40,765 MAYOR: $ 34,337 FY19-20 $ 84,077 COUNCIL: $ - Consolidated Plan Objective: Housing Programs:Rent assistance in the form of rapid FY18-19 $ 85,382 rehousing,homeless prevention,and housing stabilization 5 YR TOTAL $ 262,040 assistance REQUEST: $ 484,565 CDCIP: $ 98,508 HOMELESS PREVENTION&RAPID REHOUSING&HMIS TOTAL MAYOR: $ 98,508 COUNCIL: $ - ADMINISTRATION 1 Salt Lake City Corporation To provide management,oversight,and monitoring of the ESG program. FY22-23 $ 22,510 REQUEST: $ 22,732 7.5% Program Administration Administration:7.5%of ESG allocation. FY21-22 $ 22,630 CDCIP: $ 22,732 7.5% FY20-21 $ 22,446 MAYOR: $ 22,732 7.5% FY19-20 $ 21,843 COUNCIL: $ - 0.0% FY18-19 $ 21,659 5 YR TOTAL $ 111,088 REQUEST: $ 895,175 CDCIP: $ 303,100 HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION,RAPID RE-HOUSING,HMIS,AND ADMINISTRATION MAYOR: $ 303,100 COUNCIL: $ - Requested Funds $ 895,175 AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION: FUNDS ALLOCATED: AVAILABLE TO ALLOCATE: 23-24 GRANT AWARD: $ 303,100 CDCIP BOARD: $ 303,100 $ - REALLOCATION: $ - MAYOR: $ 303,100 $ - TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $ 303,100 COUNCIL: $ _ 303,100 Is CDCIP Board Recommendation: Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation Maximize A min at 7.5%of ESG award,not exceeding Part I Cap, increase proportionally across all projects and without going about If an increase in funding maximum request Maximize Admin at 7.5%of ESG award,not exceeding Part 1 Cap, and decrease proportionally across all projects and without going If a decrease in funding below the$30,000 funding floor Administration Analysis: ESG Page 8 SALT LAKE CITY HOME PROGRAM:FUNDING LOG 2023/2024 Final 2023-2024 Funding Available: $ 2,023,661 Available to Allocate $ A 2,023,661 APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT REQUEST/ 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN AWARDS RECOMMENDED 1 Community Development Corporation of Direct aid in the form of grants/loans not to exceed each to first-time LMI FY22-23 $ 200,000 REQUEST: $ 374,800 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Utah home buyers in Salt Lake City for down payment assistance. FY21-22 $ 200,000 CDCIP: $ 213,950 Maximum score:97 75.79 Down Payment Assistance FY20-21 $ 200,000 MAYOR: $ 213,950 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing programs that provide access FY19-20 $ 200,000 COUNCIL: $ - to home ownership via down payment assistance and/or FY18-19 $ 200,000 housing subsidy and/or financing. 5 YR TOTAL $ 1,000,000 2 Neighborworks Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition,new FY22-23 $ 208,661 REQUEST: $ 420,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: construction,and rehabilitation of existing housing. CDCIP: $ - Maximum score:97 72.57 MAYOR: $ - Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing:Support housing programs that address needs of COUNCIL: $ - aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. 3 First Step House Funds will be used to rehabilitate the Stratford Apartments which will be New REQUEST: $ 500,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: used for low income individuals CDCIP: $ 408,320 Maximum score:97 85.69 Stratford Apartments MAYOR: $ 408,320 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing development that increases COUNCIL: $ - the nummber of units available for income eligible residents(Acquistion,New Construction). 4 South Valley Sanctuary Tenant Based Rental Assistance for survivors of domestic violence. FY22-23 $ 138,500 REQUEST: $ 138,500 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: CDCIP: $ 138,431 Maximum score:97 84.14 DV Survivor Housing Assistance MAYOR: $ 138,431 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing programs that provide COUNCIL: $ - applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, homeless prevention,and housing stabilization assistance. 5 The Road Home Tenant Based Rental Assistance for eligible clients in The Road Home's FY22-23 $ 200,000 REQUEST: $ 350,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Rapid Re-housing Program. FY21-22 $ 200,000 CDCIP: $ 349,839 Maximum score:97 77.74 FY20-21 $ 200,000 MAYOR: $ 349,839 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing programs that provide FY19-20 $ 200,000 COUNCIL: $ - applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, FY18-19 $ 200,000 homeless prevention,and housing stabilization assistance. 5 YR TOTAL $ 1,000,000 6 Utah Community Action Operational support,direct client rental assistance through Tenant Based FY22-23 $ 167,669 REQUEST: $ 210,337 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Rental Assistance. FY21-22 $ 167,669 CDCIP: $ 208,757 Maximum score:97 83.05 FY20-21 $ 70,000 MAYOR: $ 208,757 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing programs that provide FY19-20 $ 70,000 COUNCIL: $ - applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, FY18-19 $ 70,000 homeless prevention,and housing stabilization assistance. 5 YR TOTAL $ 545,338 7 Volunteers of America,Utah Tenant Based Rental Assistance for eligible clients at the Youth Resource New REQUEST: $ 100,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: 83.07 YRC TBRA Program Center(Pilot) CDCIP: $ 99,372 Maximum score:97 MAYOR: $ 99,372 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing programs that provide COUNCIL: $ - applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing, homeless prevention,and housing stabilization assistance. 8 Salt Lake City Corporation Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition,new New REQUEST: $ 600,000 75.79 Salt Lake City Homebuyer Program construction,and rehabilitation of existing housing. CDCIP: $ 349,076 MAYOR: $ 349,076 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing development that increases COUNCIL: $ - the number of units available for income eligible residents (Acquistion,New Construction). 9 Salt Lake City Corporation Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition,new FY22-23 $ 153,718 REQUEST: $ 153,550 N/A CHDO Set Aside construction,and rehabilitation of existing housing. FY21-22 $ 994,634 CDCIP: $ 153,550 FY20-21 $ 1,066,667 MAYOR: $ 153,550 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Housing development that increases FY19-20 $ 939,266 COUNCIL: $ - the number of units available for income eligible residents FY18-19 $ 1,061,368 (Acquistion,New Construction). 5 YR TOTAL $ 4,2 9 30 Salt Lake City Corporation Funding toad minister the HOME program(10%of the total HOME FY22-23 $ 97,486 REQUEST: $ 102,366 Program Administration allocation). FY21-22 $ 97,486 CDCIP: $ 102,366 FY20-21 $ 95,750 MAYOR: $ 102,366 FY19-20 $ 88,507 COUNCIL: $ - FY18-19 $ 99,994 10%of Home Allocation 5YRTOTAL $ 479,223 10%of HOME Award: $ 102,366.10 REQUEST: $ 2,949,553 CDCIP: $ 2,023,661 TOTAL MAYOR: $ 2,023,661 COUNCIL: $ - FUND AVAILABILITY: AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION: 23-24 GRANT AWARD: $ 1,023,661 CDCIP ADVISORY BOARD: $ - ANTICIPATED PROGRAM INCOME: $ 800,000 MAYOR: $ - REALLOCATION: $ 200,000.00 COUNCIL: $ 2,023,661 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $ 2,023,661 CDCIP Board Recommendation:Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation Maximize Achnin at o of HOME award,set aside o for CHDO requirement,and increase proportionally across all funded projects If an increase in funding based on the percentage of the total award and weighted by score Maximize A min at 10 0 of HOME award,set aside 15 0 for CHDO requirement,and decrease proportionally across all funded projects If a decrease in funding based on the percentage of the total award and weighted by score Administration Analysis: HOME Page 10 -:::m SALT LAKE CITY HOPWA PROGRAM:FUNDING LOG 2023/2024 Final 2023-2024 Funding Available: $ 1,012,841 Available to Allocate $ 1,012,841 APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT REQUEST/ 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN AWARDS RECOMMENDED :lHousing Connect Provides Tenant Based Rental Assistance to persons with HIV/AIDS FY22-23 $ 519,185 REQUEST: $ 584,684 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Tenant Based Rental Assistance FY21-22 $ 489,332 CDCIP $ 629,102 Maximum score:97 80.33 FY20-21 $ 510,797 MAYOR: $ 629,102 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Support rent assistance programs to FY19-20 $ 438,020 COUNCIL: $ - emphasize stable housingas a primary strategyto prevent and end homelessness. FY18-19 $ 321,015 5YRTOTAL $ 2,278,349 2 Utah AIDS Foundation Provides Supportive Services to persons with HIV/AIDS FY22-23 $ 70,000 REQUEST: $ 70,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: HOPWA Supportive Services FY21-22 $ 30,000 CDCIP $ 75,319 Maximum score:97 88.50 FY20-21 $ 30,000 MAYOR: $ 75,319 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Support rent assistance programs to FY19-20 $ 30,000 COUNCIL: $ - emphasize stable housingas a primary strategy to prevent and end homelessness. FY18-19 $ 30,000 5 YR TOTAL $ 190,000 3 Utah AIDS Foundation Provides Mental Health Services to persons with HIV/AIDS FY22-23 $ 100,000 REQUEST: $ 100,000 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: Mental Health Services FY21-22 $ 50,000 CDCIP $ 107,600 Maximum score:97 87.17 FY20-21 $ - MAYOR: $ 107,600 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Behavioral Health:Support programs that provide connection to FY19-20 $ - COUNCIL: $ - permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs. FY18-19 $ 5 YR TOTAL $ 150,000 4 Utah Community Action Provides short term rental,mortgage,and/or utilities assistance,permanent FY22-23 $ 195,736 REQUEST: $ 160,639 Combined Admin&CDCIP Score: STRMU/PHP/Supportive Services housing placement,and supportive services to persons with HIV/AIDS FY21-22 $ 85,099 CDCIP $ 172,835 Maximum score:97 78.57 FY20-21 $ 162,044 MAYOR: $ 172,835 Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy: Housing Programs:Support rent assistance programs to FY19-20 $ 127,099 COUNCIL: $ - emphasize stable housingas a primary strategyto prevent and end homelessness. FY18-19 $ 142,501 5 YR TOTAL 5 Salt Lake City Corporation To provide management,oversight,and monitoring of the HOPWA program. FY22-23 $ 25,205 REQUEST: $ 27,985 Program Administration FY21-22 $ 18,026 CDCIP $ 27,985 FY20-21 $ 16,003 MAYOR: $ 27,985 FY19-20 $ 14,166 COUNCIL: $ - FY18-19 $ 12,505 5YRTOTAL $ 85,905 3%of HOPWA Award: REQUEST: $ 943,308 CDCIP ADVISORY BOARD: $ 1,012,841 TOTAL MAYOR: $ 1,012,841 COUNCIL: $ - FUND AVAILABILITY: AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION: 2023-2024 GRANT AWARD: $ 932,841 CDCIP ADVISORY BOARD: $ - REALLOCATION: $ 80,000 MAYOR: $ TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $ 1,012,841 COUNCIL: $ 1,012,841 CDCIP Board Recommendation:Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation Maximize Ad min at 3%of HOPWA award,fund Housing Connect to their full amount,then fund UCA to their full amount.If there is funding above this,then award funding proportionally across all 4 programs If an increase If a decrease Maximize Admin at 3%of HOPWA award,then reduce funding proportionally by percentage,but weighted by score. Administration Analysis: HOPWA Page 11 Item B2 •••• ' "'z MOTION SHEET _ CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ivy ii� •_'t°'.-• ii � I�'� iip TO: City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE: March 21,2023 RE: 865 South Soo East Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendment PLNPCM2o22-003oi and PLNPCM2o22-o00302 MOTION i(close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT �. A�� _��// •,� CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY NBC Item Schedule: Briefing:March 7,2023 TO: City Council Members Set Date: March 7, 2023 Public Hearing: March 21,2023 FROM: Brian Fullmer Potential Action:April 4,2023 Policy Analyst DATE: March 21, 2023 RE: 865 South Soo East Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendment PLNPCM2022-00301 and PLNPCM2022-000302 BRIEFING UPDATE The petitioner spoke at the March 7, 2023 Council briefing and presented new information about his desire to construct a detached Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)behind the existing structure on his property. Adding a residential unit on the property would satisfy housing loss mitigation requirements. Planning staff noted,as currently written,the proposed ADU ordinance update would require a seven-foot landscape buffer yard where the subject parcel abuts other residential properties to the north and east. Accessory structures are not typically allowed in buffer yards,but a development agreement stipulating the ADU would be only for residential use could allow the buffer to be eliminated.Without a development agreement,the ADU could be used for any permitted use in the proposed zone.If the Council supports including a development agreement,staff will work with Planning staff and the Attorney's Office to include a condition in the final ordinance. (It should be noted that the draft ADU ordinance update is currently under Council review and has not been adopted as of the date of this report.) Ownership of an alley on the property was discussed. Planning staff later confirmed the alley is owned by the petitioner and is not a public way. The following information was provided for the March 7, 2023 Council briefing. It is included again for background purposes. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the zoning map for a parcel at 865 South Soo East in City Council District Five from its current RMF-30(Residential Multi-family)zoning designation to CN (Neighborhood Commercial).Additionally,the proposal calls for amending the Central Community Master Plan future land use map from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial.The petitioner's stated objective is to convert the single-family residence to an unspecified commercial use. The property is located in the Central City Local Historic District and the house is listed as a contributing structure,which protects it from demolition without Historic Landmark Commission approval. Furthermore,a certificate of appropriateness would be required for any modifications whether the zoning designation is changed or remains the same.The house is currently used as a rental property. If approved by the Council,the amendments would result in the loss of one housing unit.A housing loss mitigation report for this property is found on pages 46-50 of the Planning Commission staff report.The petitioner opted to pay the approximately$62,00o difference between current market value of the house and replacement housing costs,provided the Council approves his requests. It should be noted the City Attorney's Office mentioned the status of the City's housing loss mitigation program is pending adoption of the City's new Thriving in Place housing initiatives. The Historic Landmark Commission reviewed the proposal at its October 6, 2022 meeting.The Commission felt conversion to a commercial use could be acceptable depending on modifications to the building. Commissioners also expressed concern about setting a precedent of converting low-density residential to commercial uses in the Central City Historic District. Comments about the proposal received by Planning staff were mixed.Those expressing support cited increased walkability and neighborhood vibrancy from a new commercial business.Those opposed were primarily concerned with increased on-street parking,privacy,noise,and preserving the historic integrity of the building. The Planning Commission reviewed these proposals at its October 26, 2022 meeting and held a public hearing. Four people spoke at the hearing or had their comments read into the record.Three were opposed citing resident displacement,housing shortage,preservation of the historic district and neighborhood character,and parking issues. One person shared concern about additional commercial parking in the area but did not express strong support or opposition. Planning staff recommended the Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation to the City Council stating their opinion the request does not meet applicable standards of approval.The Commission voted 5-3 to forward a positive recommendation.Those opposed did not state why the voted against the motion. Page 12 RMF-30 w 0 a m XX RMF•30 RMF-30 y, HOOVER RW-30 a' RMF-30 RMF-30 w VAN NESS PL iw RMF•45 RQ CN CN RW-45 CN RMF-30 soo s soo s goo S C6 RS CN w w S 53 05 CN R-1-5000 R-1-5000 R-1-5000 i Area zoning map with subject parcel outlined in blue.Note-the green area to the south is Liberty Park. Goal of the briefing:Review the proposed zoning and future land use map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. Does the Council wish to discuss the tradeoff of creating additional commercial space in this area at the expense of losing a residential unit? 2. Does the Council feel additional commercial space in this area of the city could benefit the community? 3. The Council may wish to ask more about the Housing Loss Mitigation fee and the status of collecting the fees while the ordinance amendments are pending. 4. The Council may wish to ask if current residents of the property will be assisted with relocation. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The City zoning ordinance(21A.26.02o.E)limits the maximum area of a continuously mapped CN (Neighborhood Commercial)district to go,000 square feet. Combining the abutting parcels currently zoned CN with the subject parcel would total less than 30,000 square feet,roughly one third of the maximum allowed area. The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property and amending the Central Community Master Plan future land use map.No formal site plan has been submitted to the City nor is it within the scope of the Council's authority to review the plans. Because zoning of a property can outlast the life of a building,any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Page 13 Planning staff identified four key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 6-14 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis,please see the staff report. Consideration i-Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning The subject parcel is near the northeast corner of Soo East and goo South.Abutting properties to the south are a restaurant,and butcher shop,also owned by the petitioner.A single-family dwelling is also abutting to the south.All three of these parcels are zoned CN. Liberty Park is located nearby to the south,across goo South. One of the largest structures in the area, a 70-unit apartment building,is directly west across Soo East. That property is zoned RMF-45 (Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential). Properties to the east, north,and northwest are zoned RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential)as shown in the area zoning map above.Those structures are primarily single-or two-family,and small multi-family dwellings. The goo South corridor in this area includes properties zoned CN,RB (Residential Business),and RMF-30. Most land uses are low-scale commercial and residential. Planning staff noted if approved by the Council, the subject property would be the first interior of a block intersecting goo South to be zoned as a non- residential district. Consideration 2-Contributing Status of Existing Building As noted above,the existing home on this property is listed as a contributing structure in the Central City Local Historic District. Because of this it is unlikely demolition would be approved.Exterior modifications or additions would need to be approved by the Historic Landmark Commission or Planning staff.The petitioner stated he plans to adaptively reuse the building for commercial use,though no specifics have been provided as of the writing of this report. Consideration 3-How the Proposal Helps Implement City Goals and Policies Identified in Adopted Plans Planning staff reviewed how the proposed zoning map and future land use map amendments align with the following City plans: • Plan Salt Lake(2015) • Central Community Master Plan(2005) • Salt Lake City Community Preservation Plan(2012) • Growing SLC(2017) They determined the proposals are consistent with the following found in the plans. • Encourage and support local businesses and neighborhood business districts. • Reduce automobile dependency and single occupancy vehicle trips. • Support the growth of small businesses,entrepreneurship, and neighborhood business nodes. • Support modification of existing historic resources to allow for changes in use that will encourage the use of the structure for housing or other appropriate uses in historic districts to ensure preservation of the structure. • Adaptive reuse of historic structures should be allowed for a variety of uses in appropriate locations where it is found that the negative impacts can be mitigated and where the uses do not require significant alterations to the historic integrity of the interior of the structure. • Provide for small-scale commercial uses that can be located within residential neighborhoods without having significant impact upon residential uses. Page 14 • Support modification of existing historic resources to allow for changes in use that will encourage the use of the structure for housing or other appropriate uses in historic districts in an effort to ensure preservation of the structure. • Adaptive reuse of historic structures should be allowed for a variety of uses in appropriate locations where it is found that the negative impacts can be mitigated and where the uses do not require significant alterations to the historic integrity of the interior of the structure. Planning staff determined the proposals are not consistent with the following elements of the plans. • Ensure access to affordable housing citywide(including rental and very low income). • Provide accessible parks and recreation spaces within 1/2 mile of all residents. • Preserve low-density residential areas and keep them from being replaced by higher density residential and commercial uses. • Review and modify land-use and zoning regulations to reflect the affordability needs of a growing, pioneering city. • Lead in the construction of innovative housing solutions. • Support diverse and vibrant neighborhoods by aligning land use policies that promote a housing market capable of accommodating residents throughout all stages of life. Planning staff noted the proposals would change the property's zoning from one that primarily permits residential units to a zone that primarily permits commercial uses and does not allow residential uses.If the property is rezoned and changed to commercial use,it cannot be converted back to single-family residential use without another zoning change. Planning stated the following: Given the age and size of the home,it is likely a "naturally occurring"affordable unit of housing, or a housing unit that is affordable because of its characteristics rather than being restricted by covenant as affordable to households of a certain income level. Therefore, the loss of this home would also represent a loss in the city's stock of affordable housing, which is already very limited. This property is roughly 200 feet(1125 mile)away from Liberty Park.If it were converted to commercial use, that would mean one fewer household would have close access to the park... Consideration 4-Comparison of RMF-3o and CN Zoning As discussed above,the proposal is to change the zoning designation and future land use map from its current RMF-30(Residential Multi-Family)to CN(Neighborhood Business).The primary differences between the zones are what uses are allowed. RMF-3o allows a variety of housing types including single-, two-,and multi-family dwellings,along with uses typically associated with residential neighborhoods,such as gardens,parks,and places of worship. CN zoning does not allow most types of housing except mixed-use,which is a combination of residential and other uses.Most uses in the CN zone are commercial. The following tables comparing RMF-3o and CN zoning designations are found on pages 12-14 of the Planning Commission staff report.They are replicated here for convenience. RMF-30 (Existing) CN(Proposed) Maximum Building Height 30 feet 25 feet Front Setback 20 feet 15 feet Side Setback Corner side yard: 10 feet Corner side yard:15 feet Interior: Interior:None a.Single-family and two-family Page 5 dwellings: Interior lots:4 feet on one side and io feet on the other Corner lots:4 feet b.Single-family attached:No yard is required,however if one is provided it shall not be less than 4 feet. c.Twin home dwelling:No yard required along one side lot line.A io- foot yard is required on the other. d.Multi-family dwelling:io feet on each side. e.All other permitted and conditional uses:io feet Rear Setback 25 percent of the lot depth,but not io feet less than 20 feet and need not exceed 25 feet Lot Size Single-family detached:5,000 SF No minimum required.Maximum lot Twin home:4,000 SF per unit size of 16,500 SF. Two-family dwelling:8,000 SF Multi-family dwelling:g,000 SF (additional lot area required for buildings with more than three units) Other permitted or conditional uses: 5,000 SF Permitted Uses Single-,two-,and multi-family Retail,offices,restaurants,other dwellings;uses associated with commercial uses,mixed use residential neighborhoods. development. NEW PERMITTED USES IN CN NEW CONDITIONAL USES IN CN Uses not permitted in RMF-3o but would be newly Uses not allowed in RMF-3o but would be allowed permitted under the proposal change to CN as a conditional use under the proposed CN zoning •Adaptive reuse of landmark site •Alcohol,bar establishment(2,500 square feet or less in •Art gallery floor area) •Artisan food production(2,500 square feet or less in floor •Animal,veterinary office area) •Bed and breakfast manor •Bed and breakfast •Parking,off site •Bed and breakfast inn •Furniture repair shop •Clinic(medical,dental) •Vehicle,automobile repair(minor) •Commercial food preparation •Daycare center,adult •Daycare center,child •Dwelling,living quarter for caretaker or security guard Page 6 •Financial institution •Governmental facility requiring special design features for security purposes •Library •Mixed use development •Mobile food business(operation on private property) •Museum •Office •Place of worship on lot less than 4 acres in size •Recreation(indoor) •Recycling collection station •Restaurant •Retail goods establishment •Plant and garden shop with outdoor sales area •Retail services establishment •Reverse vending machine •Sales and display(outdoor) •Seasonal farm stand •Studio,art PERMITTED USES INRMF-30 CONDITIONAL USES INRMF-3o NO LONGER ALLOWED IN CN NO LONGER ALLOWED IN CN Uses currently permitted in RMF-3o but would no Uses currently allowed in RMF--3o as a longer be allowed under the proposed change to conditional use but would no longer be allowed CN under the proposed change to CN •Dwelling,accessory unit •Dwelling,assisted living facility(limited •Dwelling,manufactured home capacity) •Dwelling,multi-family •Dwelling,congregate care facility(small) •Dwelling,single-family(attached) •Dwelling,group home(large) •Dwelling,single-family(detached) •Municipal service use,including City utility use •Dwelling,twin home and two-family and police and fire station •Parking,park and ride lot shared with existing use •School,seminary and religious institute •Temporary use of closed schools and churches PERMITTED USES IN BOTH RMF-3o AND CN CONDITIONAL USES IN RMF-3o Uses that are currently permitted in RMF-30 and ALSO ALLOWED IN CN would continue Uses that are currently allowed in RMF-3o as a conditional use and would continue to be allowed as a permitted or conditional use under the proposed change to CN •Accessory use,except those otherwise •Adaptive reuse of landmark site—Becomes permitted regulated in the zoning ordinance. •Daycare center,child—Becomes permitted •Community garden •Governmental facility—Becomes permitted •Daycare,nonregistered home daycare Page 17 •Daycare,registered home daycare or preschool •Place of worship on lots less •Dwelling,group home(small) •Home occupation •Open space •Park •Urban farm •Utility,building or structure •Utility,transmission wire,line,pipe,or pole Analysis of Factors Pages 35-36 of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal.The standards and findings are summarized below.Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent Does not comply with the purposes,goals,objectives,and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the Complies specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. The extent to which a proposed map amendment will Complies affect adjacent properties Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent Complies with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. The adequacy of public facilities and services Complies intended to serve the subject property,including,but not limited to,roadways,parks and recreational facilities,police and fire protection,schools, stormwater drainage systems,water supplies,and wastewater and refuse collection. City Department Review During City department and division review of the petitions,the Housing Stability Division noted the potential loss of one residential unit for non-residential use of the property and referenced housing loss mitigation. Other responding departments and divisions did not express concerns with the proposal,but stated additional review would be needed if changes are made to the property. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • March 24, 2022-Petition for zoning map and accompanying text amendment received by Planning Division. • April 7, 2022-Petition assigned to Michael McNamee,Principal Planner. Page 18 • February 9, 2022-Information about petitions sent to Central City and Liberty Wells Community Council Chairs. o The community councils did not provide formal comments. • April 28, 2022-Early notification mailed to property owners and residents within 300'of the subject property. • April-October 2022-Project posted to the Online Open House webpage. • October 6, 2022-Historic Landmark Commission briefing. • October 12, 2022-Public hearing notice posted on property. • October 13, 2022-Public hearing notice mailed to property owners and residents within 300'of the subject property. Public hearing notice posted on City and State websites and Planning Division listserv. • October 26, 2022-Planning Commission public hearing.The Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments. • October 27, 2022-Ordinance requested from Attorney's Office. • December 8, 2022-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney's Office. • December 22, 2022-Transmittal received in City Council Office. Page 19 ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor �' � and NEIGHBORHOODS �' =x Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Li (Dec22,20 5]MST) Date Received: 12/22/2022 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 12/22/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: December 22, 2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community &Neighborhoods SUBJECT: 865 S 500 E Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendment (PLNPCM2022-00301 &PLNPCM2022-00302) STAFF CONTACT: Michael McNamee, Principal Planner michael.mcnamee@slc og v.com or 801-535-7226 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the proposed Zoning Map and Master Plan amendment. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Rick Service, the property owner of 865 South 500 East, initiated a petition to amend the Zoning Map and Central Community Master Plan in March of 2022. The request is to rezone the subject property from RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial), and redesignate the property on the future land use map in the Central Community Master Plan from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. On October 26, 2022, the Planning Commission heard the petition and forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council to amend the Zoning Map and Central Community Master Plan. If approved, the property owner intends to change the use of the existing single- family home to a commercial use. The specific commercial use would be determined after the amendments were approved. The property is located in the Central City Local Historic District, and the house is listed as a contributing structure to the district, which protects it from demolition without the approval of the Historic Landmark Commission. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 Vicinity NTap 1 854 e= 857 a F— n 865 Qj 864 at �11 51721 533 537 j. Subject Property Zoning Districts _ OS Open Space �• ' - / RB ResidentiaMusness CN Neighbohood Comm ercial v R-115,000 Single-Family Residential r. RMF-30 Low Density MWti-Fam iy Residential 1 RMF-65 ModerateMgh Density Multr-F am iy Residential Salt Lake City Planning Division V28:2022 The CN zone is a commercial zoning district that is intended to be compatible with residential neighborhoods. The permitted size and scale of development is similar to RMF-30,but the number and type of land uses allowed in CN is quite different from RMF-30. RMF-30 permits single-, two-, and multi-family dwellings, as well as uses that are incidental to residential neighborhoods such as parks and daycares. By contrast, CN permits primarily commercial uses such as retail, offices, and restaurants. Residential is only allowed as part of a mixed-use development. The proposed change would facilitate the replacement of a single-family dwelling use with a commercial use. HOUSING LOSS MITIGATION: The applicant was required to submit a housing loss mitigation plan as part of this request,per Chapter 18.97 of the Zoning Ordinance, which requires that a housing loss mitigation plan is approved by the city before any petition is approved for a zoning change that would permit a nonresidential use of land, that includes within its boundaries residential dwelling units. A housing loss mitigation plan is required for this petition because the CN zone allows nonresidential uses. Options for mitigating residential housing loss include providing replacement housing, paying a fee to the City's housing trust fund based on the difference between the housing value and replacement cost of building new units, and, where deteriorated housing exists and is not caused by deliberate indifference of the landowner, the petitioner may pay a flat fee to the City's housing trust fund. These options were considered, and paying a fee based on the difference between housing value and replacement cost was determined to be the most feasible. The applicant is not proposing to build any new housing to replace the single-family dwelling that would be lost, and he is not claiming that the existing dwelling is deteriorated. The fee amount was determined in the October 18,2022 housing loss mitigation plan to be $61,967.76. The applicant has been made aware of this requirement under the ordinance. The City Attorney's Office has advised against enforcing housing loss mitigation plans pending adoption of the City's new Thriving in Place housing initiatives. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Petition for the zoning map and master plan amendment was accepted by the Salt Lake Planning Division on March 24, 2022. • The petition was assigned to Michael McNamee, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing on April 7, 2022. • The petition was deemed complete on April 20, 2022. • Information concerning this petition was sent to the chairs of the Central City and Liberty Wells Community Councils on April 28, 2022. o The Community Councils did not provide formal comments. • The surrounding property owners and residents within 300' of the subject properties received an early notification by mail on April 28, 2022. • Public notification for the Planning Commission Hearing was mailed October 13, 2022 to all neighbors within 300' of the Zoning Map and Master Plan amendment site. The public notice was also posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve. • The petition was heard by the Planning Commission on October 26, 2022. The Planning Commission voted 5-3 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council regarding the proposed zoning map and master plan amendment. o There were three public comments received prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of October 26, 2022 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of October 26, 2022 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of October 26, 2022 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3) Ordinance 4) Original Petition 5) Mailing List TABLE OF CONTENTS: I. CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORDINANCE 4. ORIGINAL PETITION 5. MAILING LIST I. CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor �' � and NEIGHBORHOODS �' =x Blake Thomas Director PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2022-00301 &302 March 24, 2022 Petition for the zoning map and master plan amendment received by the Salt Lake City Planning Division. April 7, 2022 Petition assigned to Michael McNamee,Principal Planner. April 28,2022 Information about the proposal was sent to the Chair of the Central City and Liberty Wells Community Councils in order to solicit public comments and start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment period. April 28, 2022 Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal.The Online Open House period started on April 28, 2022 and ended June 15, 2022. April 28,2022 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. June 15,2022 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. No formal comments were submitted to staff by the recognized organizations to date related to this proposal. October 12,2022 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. October 13,2022 Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting of October 26, 2022. Public hearing notice mailed. October 26, 2022 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 26, 2022. By a majority vote of 5-3, the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map and master plan amendment. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2022-0301 and PLNPCM2022- 00302—865 S 500 E Zoning Mall and Master Plan Amendment— Salt Lake City has received a request from Rick Service,the property owner,to amend the zoning map for the property located at 865 South 500 East from RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential District) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial District), and to amend the Central Community Master Plan so that the property would be redesignated on the future land use map from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. The lot is approximately .08 acres (3,628 square feet). The intent of the rezone request is to allow for the conversion of the existing single-family dwelling on the property to a commercial use. The property is located within Council District 5, represented by Darin Mano. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition.During the hearing,anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah This meeting will be held via electronic means,while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street,Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.2ov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at(801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments(a slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Michael McNamee at 801-535-7226 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at michael.mcnameekslcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https:Hcitizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the "Planning" tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2022-00301 or PLNPCM2022-00302. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.commentskslc og v.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. ORDINANCE SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Amending the zoning of property located at 865 South 500 East Street from RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District to CN Neighborhood Commercial District, and amending the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 865 South 500 East Street from RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District to CN Neighborhood Commercial District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00301, and amending the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00302. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on October 26, 2022 on an application submitted by Rick Service ("Applicant") to rezone property located at 865 South 500 East Street(Tax ID No. 16-07-276-024) (the "Property") from RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District to CN Neighborhood Commercial District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00301, and to amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map with respect to that parcel from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00302; and WHEREAS, at its October 26, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council") on said applications; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Property identified on Exhibit"A" attached hereto shall be and hereby is rezoned from RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District to CN Neighborhood Commercial District. SECTION 2. Amending the Central Community Master Plan. The Future Land Use Map of the Central Community Master Plan shall be and hereby is amended to change the future land use designation of the Property identified in Exhibit"A" from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM (SEAL) Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Hate:Dec tuber 8, 2022 Bill No. of 2023. By: Published: PA!C. ielso Senior City Attorney Ordinance amending zoning and MP 865 S 500 E EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property to be Rezoned and Subject to Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment: 865 South 500 East Tax ID No. 16-07-276-024 BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK 2, EHRICHS SUBDIVISION, OF BLOCK 5, PLAT B, SALT LAKE CITY SURVEY, AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 33 FEET;THENCE EAST 110 FEET; THENCE NORTH 33 FEET;THENCE WEST 110 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH A PERPETUAL RIGHT OF WAY OVER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED STRIP OF LAND, TO-WIT: BEGINNING 33 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3, THENCE EAST 140 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 FEET; THENCE WEST 140 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 4. ORIGINAL PETITION Zoning Am& F. . d m e nt .4 f� O Arnend the text of th!e Zoning Ord Inance Amend the Zoning Map _ 9,FI cr UtE iota Received By; Oaie Received: j Project#: Name flf Sectlon6mf Zoning Amendment: PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOVInFiduffeRWAUM {Address of Subject property(or Ar4m):. 868 South 5W EW Name of Applicant; Phone: Rick Serve 1-MM735 AddmFi of Applicant: P.O. Box 71899. Salt Lake City, Ur 7`f E-=Al of Appi Ica n#: Q f�ajt: r ck-8 vice87 ftahoo.0o-m ;801-68"735 Agplicas Interest in b)ect Pr +rty: 0 Owner (3 contractor IJ Architect ❑ cther. Name of Property Owne if different fra-m applicant). 5$e 9 L LC E=mali.ef Prgerty Owner; #line: iiCkserviceUgyahoo.ca N i-680- 735 Tease nGte that addstiona#iniurmation may be required by the pn4W Planner to wisure adequate infarmaton is provided for staff analysis. All ir#fnrmation required for staff a Iysls wdl he copied and made public, Induding prof sionai archkedural.ar engineering drawlop,for the purposes of put9k review by any interested parley, r AVM WNSWAT — - — If you have any riveWons regarding the requirements laf this appilwion,pkwe ccr%W Salt Lake City Planning Counter at igninK&sl ov.c9rm prior t#submitting the appliaff on. Map Amer,drnerri~filing-fee of t,075 plus$VA W acre in excess of one acre Text Arn endme filing fee of$1,M,plus fees fcw newspaper notice. - Pius,additkmal fee for Mailed public bms- Ncrti ne fees will be assessed after the&Wkzdan is ` - subm fitted. If apOicable,a:np1arW!d st errieM of consent auth.021 9 apMkant to act as an agent wd H he required. Signature of OwW Alert: . Data; Rick Service !=4122 L PrajeaCmik llptfon(please eiectroni IN attac:h additional shuts.See 2tqion fiGlr. ke Amendmints ordinance-) 1 Astatenlen detiaring-ths purpose fer the afnendmerat.. ' I A descrfptia�n of the proposed rise of the property being rezoned-List the reasons why the pmem zoning may not be appraprIa' - W 4itea. Li�the requesi arrmndin the Zoning MaP? If.so, please lis#the parcel numbers to be changed. .is ttl 6 n_quest arnendirig the text ot tile r3g Ordinance3 s+D.please include language a-nd the rice to the ZDniniR ordinance to be changedVAHMTOMFE Apply ordine through the Cl portal.There a she aide to tiea m how tD subma online. - Fts l eanowledge that Salt Lake MY rewires the items abuve to be submitted Wore My application can be mod.l = understand that!fanning will"t accW nny apglir_at�an u:iiessall of the fojbwing items included#n the submittal package. Opted W23/7= Zoning Amendment Requirements The reason for changing the zoning from RM`F-30 to CN Neighborhood Commercial are many. The existing residential building at 865 South 500 bast is placed on the lot in such a way that it lends itself more to the two neighboring properties to the sow zoned GIB. The-two neighboring properties to the south are 501 & 511 East 900 South. 511 East 900 South and 866 South 500 East share a driveway. 511 East.900 nth has their Handicap parking space at the rear of the property that is accessed from the shared driveway. Their deliveries are also received by use of the shared driveway. There is no alleyway access so all deliveries must back down the shared driveway. 865 South 500 East does not have covered parking, it just has two paddrig spaces at the fear of the building. There is Oo back yard to this house, which is why it is impossible to rent the house to a €ernily, UDI T� along.with Sett Lake City, are in the process of improving bus travel along 500 Ea:wL They have put a large cement pad directly in front of the house slang M.th a .bp A large lighted enclosure with a garbage can will be install soon. That makes es the property feel lime a commercial property with no front yard. Last out not least 1 truly want the challenge of improving and transforming the residential building to a small cnmmerbial building. When I purchased the neighboring two propeAles to the south, one was A-n'abandoned gas station for years with graffifl on the walls and a n ake- shift homeless persons shelter. 1 turned 501 East 900 South into the restaurant "Tradtt ". tt was galte a challenge but I feel it turned out well, The property at- 111 East goo South when I purchased it was a 100 year old house being used as a residential rental. I remodeled It and today it is a very thriving commercial building as Beltex Meats, a very successful butcher shop. Both properties employ local people bHnging revenue into the area. Knowing that-this houses-in the Hi tofic Us c# as It was built in 1908, 1 will be able to work wqh the Historic District to improve th. .O a of the building while staying within the parameters set tyy tflp Historic Distr L Tha adjoining properties zoned CN have a total square footage of 14,_908 square fleet. This CN zoning allows for up to 90,000 square feet. With the additio'n-of 86,5 South 500 East being only 3,484 square feet there will be a total of only 18,292 square feet for the entirety of tha new proposed CN zone. This is mudl smaller than the allowed 90,000 square feet, Altowing this property to be added to the existing CN zoning will create a more Manced and useable commemial corner. The C N zoning calls for"small scale low intensity commeoulal ease". I Wieve that changing the zoning of this property too CN will to do just that. Please give me the opportunity to improve the property. At this time I do not have a specific use in mind for the property. I have spoken with severial people who might be intemsted In the space. One such pdimon wants to peat a dog grooming and supply store, another parson who runs a very successful sandwich shop wants to open a new location them. I anticipate remodeling the building and making it•ashining example of what is possible in the CN zoning. Parcel Number 16-07- 7C-0 4-0000 k = Master PI- al , A A 16ndment L Amend the text of the Master Plan Amend the Lard Use Map IE USE CKLY _ Received By: date Recelved: Proje #:lF Name*f McAer Plan Am2ptidmerrfi' OREL _ PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INF10RMAT1OH Address of SubjectPropefty(or Area): — -- -- 865 South 5DD East Name of Applicarru Phone: Rick Service 1- 13U-5735 Address df'Applfcarii: P.O. Box 71899, Sit Lalw Cfty. UT 841 E-malt of Applicant: CMWF&t rickservico67 @yahon.corn ►-ppficarrt's Interest in Subject Pm"rty: Owner 0 Ctmtra=r ❑ Archty rt f] Other. Name of PruWrty Owner(if different#ram appliearal; E-malI of Property Owner, � Phone- l icksem ceMyahooxo m #-680-6736 Please note that adds#renal information may be r6ouiraed by the prqject iv ensure adequate Wormat€on is provided far staff anahmis. All infori>kalan required for.st Wan ahysisF:wlll be nnpied end Rode public, rnduding prnfmlonal drLhIte�tural or engineering drawings,fartKe purposes of public ld h~vierw by any interested party, t* AVAEi '041 IS XTAIM �► Planners are.ayailahie for utmion prior to submiWng this application. Please email• nir?,65J Ro'yr,cpm It you have a questions regarding the regOremenU*f this application. REQf.tRFD FIEF Filing fee of SIOUB 1pl.s SM per acre in excesi of one acre. — — M for newspaper notice- PCusr additional Fee for mailed public notfces. Mailing fees wilt be' 'assessed after application is submitlid. ltaPpiir-abif!,ii4kga!rizedstAeTrFentof consent authorizing appilc4�11 t i'd asagagent will be required. Signature of Owner or Agent/ I Date: Hick SeMce 3/24122 updated V1612m I 11d11'TA@LARE Mtf NTS L Proms#Desaip#lon(pleasea#tach ad final she le�r#rnn€rtally, Di�sCribe the praKsed mks n; Wr Wnt, AsUft. declarttg the porpese forth@ I errdrnent_ rlD P.wlam achy the pre:znt master p]arw x ul�sa�tendirsg. Is the"uest amending the land use MV? Ifkq.please I the parcel numbers to be Chance& Is•thi regMM amending the text of the master plan? If so.please Include exact language to be changed. �}D]Ffl.l�NE C# PL�FE AI�L.I#A�'ION Apply online through the CWzgn AEeigss Portal.There is a s"teo-hy-steo�uEe to learn haw to subrrait anlirte. 1 NCO MP!-ETE APPUCATIOft WILL NOT BE ACCEI�Tt R #acknowledge that Salt Lake city requires the items above to be subrn"ed before ray application can be processed. I urnderstand that Planning wfll not acW my application unless all of the following items are included in the submittal package. Master Plan Amendment I wish to charge a smali portion of the Central Communfty Master Plan. The plan change would be to amend the zoning of a single family residence zoned RMF-- 0 to-a N Neighborhood Commercial zone. Thet.pfoperty is at 865 South 500 Fit. Ttm property is bordered by two properties zoned CN. Wth a zoning change of tom` property, all thr properties on the corner of 500 East and 60 South will have t?iie same zoning, This will create a balance to the comer and will promote more conwwrcW services to the ongoing vibrant Uberty Park Neighborhood. It will crude a -ga#ier#rig place in Such a walkable ne[ghborhood. The infrastructure is already in place to support the charge. Part of the Central Community Master Plan is to promote mores � ornmefcial SerVrices in the area.The amendment change will aRow me the flexibility to select a tenant that will add to the vibrant area. Parcel bomber_ 1 -07- 76-0 4-0000 t �_ � i le i i } { t Y i } i 1 i r� !� r 4 i� M ' i }/� 3 + _L 7i j � '� 1 1 � '+� ,� -, � � r r •� 4 ��� } � ry �++ r } � ' �� - L r• -- f: �� 5. MAILING LIST geometry Occupant PARCEL—A[NEW—UNIT CITY STATE ZIPCODE Geocortex.Current Oc 828 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 836 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 475 E 900 ! Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 906 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84105 Geocortex.Current Oc 827 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 841 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 857 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 840 S PARK Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 844 S PARV Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 848 S PARK#NFF1 Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 846 S PARV Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 865 S 500 E Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 Geocortex.Current Oc 501 E 900 ! Salt Lake Ci UT 84105 Geocortex.Current Oc 511 E 900 ! Salt Lake Ci UT 84105 Geocortex.Current Oc 533 E 900! Salt Lake Ci UT 84105 Geocortex.Current Oc 853 S PARK Salt Lake Ci UT 84102 geometry OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDown_unit OWN_CITYOWN_STA-OWN_ZIP Geocortex.LIBERTY 9 LLC 1126 E GILI SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.HARRIS APARTMENTS SLC LLC 1012 CHAN OGDEN UT 84403 Geocortex.ROBERT A EVANS 844 S 500E SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.JOSE R LEAL;ARMANDO VALLE(TC) 854 S 500E SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SALT LAKE 1776 S WE' SALT LAKE UT 84115 Geocortex.SARAH GENE JOLLEY 848 S 500E SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 883 E 4900 MURRAY UT 84107 Geocortex.GERALD&LISA OTTO TRUST 8/28/2017 460 CREST` PARK CITY UT 84098 Geocortex.DUANE E CRABTREE;ELISSA CRABTREE(JT) 833 S 500E SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.MICHAEL W BAKER;ERIN BAKER CAPOBIANCO 672 LARCH DALY CITY CA 94015 Geocortex.ROBERT J WYNNE 851 S 500E SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.AMM TRUST PO BOX 58 SALT LAKE UT 84158 Geocortex.BRYCE R WHITAKER 828 S PARK SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 4605 S BO) MURRAY UT 84107 Geocortex.844 S PARK ST,A SERIES OF PREF GROUP,LLC 939 W HEP PHOENIX AZ 85013 Geocortex.MICHAEL W BAKER;ERIN BAKER CAPOBIANCO 672 LARCH DALY CITY CA 94015 Geocortex.TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 2864 E PIN COTTONW UT 84121 Geocortex.JOHN SEARLE;BENJAMIN TOLMAN(JT) 852 5 PARK SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.CHRISTINE REYES 8565 PARK SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.KDC TRUST 860 S PARK SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.5&9,LLC 3201 E CHI, COTTONW UT 84121 Geocortex.STEVEN R SEARE 517 E 900!#NFF1 SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.CHRISTINA S HANNAN-CANETE HERITAGE TRUST 6/30/2017 521 E 900!#NFF1 SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.DEBRA FRAZIER LIVING TRUST 12/07/2018 864 S PARK SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.5&9,LLC 3201 E CHI, COTTONW UT 84121 Geocortex.5&9,LLC 3201 E CHI, COTTONW UT 84121 Geocortex.STEVEN R SEARE 517 E 900! SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.CHRISTINA S HANNAN-CANETE HERITAGE TRUST 6/30/2017 521 E 900! SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.JBELA LLC 1241 E POP MILLCREEK UT 84117 Geocortex.JAMES SULLIVAN 537 E 900! SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.CHELSEA SIMMONS 539 E 900! SALT LAKE UT 84105 Geocortex.SIAOSI P VAENUKU;SIAOSI P AKA:VAENUKU VAENUKU;KATALINA F VAENU 849 S PARK SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.MAC R CURTIS;SUSAN L CURTIS 851 S PARK SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.PARK STREET PROPERTIES LLC 6737 S HUI SALT LAKE UT 84121 Geocortex.SELDOM SCENE HOLDINGS,LLC 857 S PARK SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.JEANETTE NEWHOUSE;CALE NEWHOUSE 859 S PARK SALT LAKE UT 84102 Geocortex.MARK ANDREW LOEWEN;NATALIE KAY LOEWEN(JT) 545 E 900! SALT LAKE UT 84105 Item B3 ;•••• 0 "o% MOTION SHEET :/i,,,y -- _ CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ivy ii� •_'t°'.-• ii � I�'� iip TO: City Council Members FROM: Sam Owen,Policy Analyst DATE: March 21,2023 RE: Ordinance: Electric Vehicle Readiness Off-Street Parking Stalls Amendment MOTION i I move the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future meeting. MOTION 2 I move the Council continue the public hearing. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayor ♦,alp T.w°'' CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL L,5 (Jan 17,202309:52 MST) Date Received: 01/17/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date Sent to Council: 01/17/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 13, 2023 Darin Mano,Chair U UV� FROM: Debbie Lyons, Sustainability Director SUBJECT: Council-Requested Revision:Electric Vehicle Readiness Off-Street Parking Stalls Amendment STAFF CONTACTS: Peter Nelson Sustainable Business Program Manager Peter.Nelsonkslcgov.com 1 801-535-6477 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the ordinance amending and updating Sections of the Salt Lake City Code for Off-Street Parking,21A.44.040,relating to electric vehicle readiness parking stall requirements, as revised BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This transmittal is supplementary to the ordinance proposal Electric Vehicle Readiness Off-Street Parking Stalls Amendment discussed during the City Council work session on Tuesday,January 3rd, 2023.At that work session, Council members noted that it is not uncommon for multifamily development projects to construct more off-street parking stalls than are required, and that it is the Council's desire that the proposed ordinance's EV-Ready threshold of 2o% apply to the number of parking stalls ultimately provided, rather than those that are merely required.Attached to this transmittal is revised ordinance language— specifically language found on lines 42-43 of the Legislative Version—which reflect this change to the proposed ordinance. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2023 3 4 (Ordinance amending Section 21A.44.040 of the Salt Lake City Code 5 pertaining to EV-readiness for required off street parking) 6 7 WHEREAS,Chapter 21 A.44 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Off Street Parking,Mobility, 8 and Loading) sets forth minimum and maximum requirements for off-street parking spaces for 9 different zoning districts within Salt Lake City; and 10 WHEREAS, Section 21A.44.040(B) of the Salt Lake City Code currently mandates the 11 inclusion of one(1)parking spaces dedicated to electric vehicles and equipped with an electric vehicle 12 ("EV") charging station for every twenty-five (25) parking spaces for all multi-family use buildings 13 (the"EV Parking Ordinance"); and 14 WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation ("City") is committed to carbon emissions 15 reduction, and pursuant to Resolution No. 33 of 2016, a joint resolution of the Slat Lake City 16 Council and Mayor establishing renewable energy and carbon emissions reduction goals for Salt 17 Lake City, adopted a goal of reducing carbon emissions by 50%by 2030; and 18 WHEREAS, on December 8th, 2020 the City Council and the Mayor adopted Resolution 19 No. 45 of 2020, a joint resolution of Salt Lake City Council and Mayor establishing electrified 20 transportation goals for Salt Lake City, establishing a commitment to support the development of 21 electric vehicle charging infrastructure,plus other programs, policies, and projects that encourage 22 the purchase and use of electric vehicles by local residents; and 23 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that updates to the EV Parking Ordinance are 24 necessary to require new multi-family use developments or major reconstruction projects of multi- 25 family buildings to include electric vehicle readiness infrastructure to support electric vehicle use for 26 Salt Lake City residents in advancement of the City's carbon emissions reduction goals. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 27 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 28 SECTION 1. Amending Section 21A.44.040. Section 21A.44.040(B) of the Salt Lake City 29 Code shall be, and hereby is, amended to read as follows: 30 21A.44.040: REQUIRED OFF STREET PARKING: 31 B. Electric Vehicle Parking: 32 1. Each multi-family use shall provide a minimum of one (1)parking space dedicated to electric 33 vehicles for every twenty-five (25)parking spaces provided on-site. Electric vehicle parking spaces 34 shall count toward the minimum required number of parking spaces. The electric vehicle parking 35 space shall be: 36 Via. Located in the same lot as the principal use; 37 fib. Located as close to a primary entrance of the principal building as possible; 38 3 c. Signed in a clear and conspicuous manner, such as special pavement marking or signage, 39 indicating exclusive availability to electric vehicles; and 40 4d. Outfitted with a standard electric vehicle charging station. 41 2. In addition to Electric Vehicle Parking requirements, each multi-family use shall provide a 42 minimum of 20% electric vehicle ready (EV-ready)parking spaces of parking spaces 43 provided on-site. EV-ready parking spaces are parking spaces that are equipped with electrical 44 conduit and sufficient electrical capacity for the future use of a minimum 200-volt electric vehicle 45 charging station. The location of proposed EV-ready_parking spaces shall be indicated on submitted 46 site plans. 47 a. EV-ready_parking requirements shall count toward the minimum required and maximum 48 allowed number of parking spaces. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 49 b. Parking areas with four or fewer vehicle parking spaces are not required to identify an EV- 50 ready parking space. pace. 51 c. Where no minimum parkin inquired, the 20% EV-ready_parking space requirement will 52 be based on provided parking 53 d. For new multi-family uses, a minimum of 20% of required Accessible (ADA)parking 54 spaces shall be constructed as EV-ready. 55 e. Electric vehicle parking spaces provided in accordance with Subsection B.1 that exceed 56 the minimum number of required spaces established in that subsection shall count towards the 57 required number of EV-ready_parking spaces required in this Subsection B.2. 58 SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first 59 publication. 60 61 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this_day of , 2023. 62 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 63 64 65 CHAIRPERSON 66 ATTEST: 67 68 69 CITY RECORDER 70 71 72 Transmitted to Mayor on 73 Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. 74 75 76 77 MAYOR 78 79 80 CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM 81 (SEAL) Salt Lake City Attorney's Office 82 83 Date: 84 Bill No. of 2023 85 Published: 86 Sara Montoya, Senior City Attorney 87 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Ordinance amending Section 21A.44.040 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to EV-readiness for required off street parking) WHEREAS,Chapter21A.44 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Off Street Parking,Mobility, and Loading) sets forth minimum and maximum requirements for off-street parking spaces for different zoning districts within Salt Lake City; and WHEREAS, Section 21A.44.040(B) of the Salt Lake City Code currently mandates the inclusion of one (1)parking spaces dedicated to electric vehicles and equipped with an electric vehicle ("EV") charging station for every twenty-five(25) parking spaces for all multi-family use buildings (the"EV Parking Ordinance"); and WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation ("City") is committed to carbon emissions reduction, and pursuant to Resolution No. 33 of 2016, a joint resolution of the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor establishing renewable energy and carbon emissions reduction goals for Salt Lake City, adopted a goal of reducing carbon emissions by 50%by 2030; and WHEREAS,on December 8th, 2020 the City Council and the Mayor adopted Resolution No. 45 of 2020, a joint resolution of Salt Lake City Council and Mayor establishing electrified transportation goals for Salt Lake City, establishing a commitment to support the development of electric vehicle charging infrastructure, plus other programs, policies, and projects that encourage the purchase and use of electric vehicles by local residents; and WHEREAS,the Salt Lake City Council finds that updates to the EV Parking Ordinance are necessary to require new multi-family use developments or major reconstruction projects of multi- family buildings to include electric vehicle readiness infrastructure to support electric vehicle use for Salt Lake City residents in advancement of the City's carbon emissions reduction goals. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1.Amending Section 21A.44.040. Section 21A.44.040(B) of the Salt Lake City Code shall be, and hereby is, amended to read as follows: 21A.44.040: REQUIRED OFF STREET PARKING: B. Electric Vehicle Parking: 1. Each multi-family use shall provide a minimum of one (1)parking space dedicated to electric vehicles for every twenty-five (25)parking spaces provided on-site. Electric vehicle parking spaces shall count toward the minimum required number of parking spaces. The electric vehicle parking space shall be: a. Located in the same lot as the principal use; b. Located as close to a primary entrance of the principal building as possible; c. Signed in a clear and conspicuous manner, such as special pavement marking or signage, indicating exclusive availability to electric vehicles; and d. Outfitted with a standard electric vehicle charging station. 2. In addition to Electric Vehicle Parking requirements, each multi-family use shall provide a minimum of 20% electric vehicle ready (EV-ready)parking spaces of parking spaces provided on- site. EV-ready parking spaces are parking spaces that are equipped with electrical conduit and sufficient electrical capacity for the future use of a minimum 200-volt electric vehicle charging station. The location of proposed EV-ready parking spaces shall be indicated on submitted site plans. a. EV-ready parking requirements shall count toward the minimum required and maximum allowed number of parking spaces. b. Parking areas with four or fewer vehicle parking spaces are not required to identify an EV- ready parking space. c. Where no minimum parking is required, the 20%EV-ready parking space requirement will be based on provided parking. d. For new multi-family uses, a minimum of 20% of required Accessible (ADA)parking spaces shall be constructed as EV-ready. e. Electric vehicle parking spaces provided in accordance with Subsection B.1 that exceed the minimum number of required spaces established in that subsection shall count towards the required number of EV-ready parking spaces required in this Subsection B.2. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this_day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM (SEAL) Salt Lake City Attomey's Office Date: January 13, 2023 Bill No. of 2023 Published: Sara Montoya,Senior Ofy Attorney Item #B4 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY i� tinyurl.com/SLCFY2g x Fr'� Cn TO: City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards Budget Analysts DATE: March 21,2023 UPDATED 6:55 PM RE: Budget Amendment Number Five FY2023 MOTION 1—CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT MOST REMAINING ITEMS I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2023 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document only for items as shown on the motion sheet. Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the individual items being approved below; they are listed for reference. The budget amendment is still open and the Council may consider remaining items at a future date. A-1: Rapid Intervention Team Trailer($25,000 from General Fund Balance to the Fleet Fund) A-2:City Hall Earthquake Repairs($2.65 Million from General Fund Balance to the CIP Fund) A-3: Fiber Conduit to Improve Connections between City Facilities as part of the 200 South Reconstruction Project($242,285 from the IMS Fund) A-5: Public Safety Radio Replacements Cost Increases($2.4 Million from the IMS Fund) A-6: Consulting to Create Enterprise Bill System Replacement for Public Utilities Billing System(PUBS) ($250,000 from the IMS Fund) A-7: Lindsey Gardens CIP Project Rescope($459,36o in the CIP Fund) A-8:Anonymous Donation for the Avenues City Cemetery($1 Million Donation) A-9: One-time Retention Bonuses and Ongoing Hiring Bonuses for Police Officers($4.3 Million from ARPA and$1,201,976 from General Fund Balance) A-11: Study to Create Downtown Main Street Pedestrian Mall Additional Funding($1oo,000 from General Fund Balance) D-1: Interest on General Obligation Series 2019A,Series 202o and Series 2021($6o6,325 in the CIP Fund) D-3:300 West Roadway Bond Adjustments($2.15 Million in the CIP Fund) D-4: Insurance Funds for City and County Building/Earthquake Damage($7,252,300 in the CIP Fund) D-5:IMS Budget for New General Fund Positions($207,000 in the IMS Fund) CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 D-6: Real Property Purchase—CIP Budget Associated with BA*4 Council-Added Initiative D-7: Move Cost of Bond Issuance Costs from CIP to Debt Service Fund Class Council Consent Agenda No.5 G-1: Know Your Neighbor Grant Program,Open Society Foundation-Salt Lake County($61,000 from Miscellaneous Grants) G-2: Utah State Office of Education,Child and Adult Care Food Program-Youth After School Programs ($46,000 from Miscellaneous Grants) Section G: Council Consent Agenda No.6 G-1: U S Department of Justice,Community Oriented Policing Services(COPS),FY22 Community Police Development(CPD)Grant I-1: Downtown Streets Enhanced Activation for 2023 Summer($500,000 from General Fund Balance) I-2:Technology Upgrades in the Committee of the Whole,Formal Chamber,and Cannon Rooms,and Removable ADA Ramps to the Formal Chamber Dais,and Enterprise License for Zoom($55,000 from General Fund Balance) I-3: Physical Security Improvements to City Hall($1 Million from General Fund Balance to CIP Fund Holding Account),The Council requests that the Administration provide a written review of potential physical security improvements before the funds are released Council Member Mano may now be recused MOTION 2—ADOPT ITEM A-io I move that the Council adopt an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2023 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document only for item A-io. A-io: Real Property Purchase($200,000 from General Fund Balance to the CIP Fund) Council Member Mano may now return MOTION 3—ADOPT ITEM I-4 I move that the Council adopt an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2023 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document only for item I-4. I-4: "Lockhart Alley"Reconstructing Three Sections($208,373 from General Fund Balance to CIP Fund) MOTION 4 — CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. MOTION 5—CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date. MOTION 6—CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING and NOT ADOPT I move that the Council close the public hearing and proceed to the next agenda item. f COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 � /11Ry-rLy� {- ■11 1111, TO: City Council Members Project Timeline: Set Date: February ,2023 FROM: Ben Luedtke,Sylvia Richards Y 1 Briefing: March 7,202323 Budget and Policy Analysts Public Hearing&Partial Adoption:March 7,2023 2nd Briefing: March 14,2023 DATE: March 21,2023 3rd Briefing&Continued Public Hearing:March 21,2023 Potential Action: March 21,2023 RE: Budget Amendment Number Five FY2023 NEW INFORMATION At the March 14 briefing,the Council finished reviewing remaining items including a revised police officer bonus program and potential Council-added items in Section I.The Council also straw polled item I-2 for technology upgrades to improve capabilities to hold hybrid meetings in the Committee of the Whole,Council Chambers,and the Cannon Room,and add removable ADA ramps to the dais in the formal chambers.Note the estimated cost was also reduced to$40,000.Based on the Council's accessory dwelling unit(ADU)discussion,item I-5 for potential incentives and/or enforcement related to ADUs will be tracked for consideration during the upcoming FY2024 annual budget in May and June. Council Members may wish to review the attached draft motion sheet for March 21 which includes partially adopts most remaining items.The budget amendment would still be open for the Council to consider remaining items later,possibly in April. A-9 Police Officer Bonuses Revised Proposal Pending The total requested funding and sources remain the same as originally proposed by the Administration in the transmittal.The bonus amounts and length of commitment to continue employment with the Police Department changed.All officers,except executive level(e.g.,deputy chief and above),would be offered an$8,500 one-time bonus with a two-year employment commitment.The bonus also includes the City paying the pensionable cost of approximately$4,000 to the Utah Retirement System for the employee's pension.If an officer left employment with the City before completing the two-year commitment,then they would need to repay a prorated share of the cost to the City. Police Chief Brown shared a presentation with the Council and additional context.Some highlights include: - The Department currently has 39 sworn police officer vacancies(note this is a moving target that changes weekly and sometimes daily as employees leave and are hired for various reasons). - 57 officers are currently in training either at the academy as new hires,doing field training,or department- required specialty training for lateral officers which is in addition to basic POST training. - The Department has relied on mandatory overtime to maintain minimum patrol staffing levels during some of this fiscal year.The Chief stated this approach helps in the short-term but is unsustainable in the long term. - The estimated cost is$125,000- $150,000 for a new police officer from date of hire to completion of all trainings so they can fully operate as an officer out on patrol. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 The following information appeared in the initial staff report for the March 7th,work session.It is provided again for reference: Council Actions on March 7 At the March 7 briefing,the Council took three straw polls 6-o with one Member absent supporting items A-2,A-3, and A-5 which were urgent because of upcoming price increases later this month.The Council also continued the public hearing to March 21 with new advertising and partially adopted item E-1:Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance Program Additional Resources$2 Million for Salt Lake City tenant rental assistance through the Utah Rent Relief Program.The Program(partnership between the City and State)stopped accepting applications on February 5.The$2 million will fund the backlog of Salt Lake City tenants who submitted applications before the deadline.The budget amendment remains open.The Council will continue discussing remaining items at the March 14 briefing and previously discussed items if updates are available. A-9 Police Officer Bonuses Revised Proposal Pending The Council did not review item A-9 one-time retention bonuses and ongoing hiring bonuses for police officers because the Administration is developing a revised proposal.At the time of publishing this staff report those details were pending. D-3:300 West Roadway Bond Adjustments Update For item D-3,the Administration provided an updated list of street reconstruction projects that would use the rescoped$2.15 million of bond funds.The 300 West reconstruction project is coming in under budget so the funds can be used for other street reconstruction projects.Voters approved the general obligation bond in 2018.The costs listed for each project below are estimates. - 300 West from goo South to 2100 South-$100,000 - 110o East from goo South to Logan Avenue-$800,000 - goo South from goo West to Lincoln Street-$400,000 - 2100 South from 70o East to 130o East—$850,000(Design) E-1 Options Pending to Use Remaining$2 million from U.S.Treasury's Emergency Rental Assistance Program The Council requested additional information from the Community and Neighborhoods Department about options to use the remaining$2 million in item E-1 for rent assistance such as leveraging existing housing programs through Funding Our Future.The Council also requested narrower options within the broad category of housing services.At the time of publishing this staff report those details were pending. Council-added item I-1: Downtown Streets Enhanced Activation Update Council Members expressed interest in continuing the summer open streets event downtown on Main Street from South Temple to 400 South which has a placeholder in item 1-1.The Economic Development Department is meeting with the Downtown Alliance later this month to learn more about the open streets events over the past three years,what it would take to hold a similar event this summer,and which regulatory adjustments during the pandemic helped facilitate the event but are now reverted to pre-pandemic status.Examples mentioned during the briefing impacted barriers on the street,private uses of public spaces,liability,and temporary permitting.The Department will work on options to hold summer street activation events to bring back to the Council for consideration.Some Council Members want to fund permanent barriers between the light rail TRAX trains and travel lanes on Main Street as an improvement this year instead of renting temporary barriers annually which is one of the most expensive line items for the event.Council Members also mentioned an example from Cincinnati of removable bollards that can be locked into place as a nicer looking transportation barrier than the temporary orange construction style barriers. A new potential Council-added item I-5 was discussed during the briefing to address incentives creating and enforcement of existing accessory dwelling units.Some Council Members were interested in adding funding for this proposal immediately while others voiced a preference to consider it in the context of the annual budget.A draft write-up for the item follows: Page 1 2 I-5:Accessory Dwelling Unit Incentives and Enforcement($TBD from General Fund Balance One- time) Enforcement Add 1 or more employees(FTEs)in Civil Enforcement specifically to address ADU related violations including noise,illegal Short-Term Rentals,etc.Costs could be offset by fees(idea raised in item i.c.). Consider allocating fiords in BudgetAmendment*5 as a Council-added item. Incentives Use a legislative intent or allocate funds in Budget Amendment#5,or an upcoming RDA budget amendment,to make creation of affordable ADU programs a higher priority.The funding could address staffing costs to develop and administer programs as well as direct program costs such as incentives.Ideas raised include pre-approved development plans,subsidy for utility connection fees,direct financial support in form of grants or loans,examine other way's ADUs have shown to be expensive(fire sprinklers,etc.). The following information appeared in the initial staff report for the March 7th,work session.It is provided again for reference: Budget Amendment Number Five includes 24 proposed amendments, $33,321,895 of expenditures of which $6,240,349 is from Fund Balance,requested changes to six funds.If all the items are adopted as proposed,then Fund Balance would be 22.9%which is$40,507,938 above the 13%minimum target. Two items are urgent with straw poll requests: Item A-5$2.4 million additional funding for the radios upgrade, (was expected and builds on funding in the Sales Tax Bond)and Item A-3,an increase in the cost for fiber upgrades to City facilities to over$250,000(unexpected and urgent because it needs to be done during a street reconstruction project).As noted in the staff report,the Administration is requesting straw polls for both items. Page 13 Council Request:Tracking New Ongoing General Fund Costs Approved in Midyear Budget Amendments Council staff has provided the following list of new ongoing costs to the General Fund.Many of these are new FTE's approved during this fiscal year's budget amendments,noting that each new FTE increases the City's annual budget if positions are added to the staffing document. Budget Estimated Cost Amendment Item Increase to Next New City FTEs Notes Annual Budget Homeless Shelter Cities 13 new FTEs which Admin expects to apply for grant funding Mitigation Grant Award includes: annually to cover these costs.General Fund #1 $2.2 Million 12 police officers and would not need to cover costs if the State grant is one business and awarded to the City to fully cover the costs. community liaison Utah League of Cities N/A Total annual membership cost is$221,563 #3 and Town Membership $38,000 Cost Increase Two Contract Two new FTEs Development $207,800 Specialists in Finance Senior Project Manager One new FTE The$85 Million Parks Bond could pay for this in Public Services $168,000 FTE in future fiscal years.The General Fund fronted the cost in FY2023.The position sunsets with the bond funding. Two Planners in Public Two new FTEs The$85 Million Parks Bond could pay for these Lands FTEs in future fiscal years.The General Fund $�41'440 fronted the cost in FY2023.The positions sunset #4 with the bond funding. Volunteers of America N/A Separate from VONs countywide outreach team. (VOA)Salt Lake City Specific Outreach Team $274,000 Four existing VOA workers: Two case managers and two coordinators Police Substation on N/A North Temple and Downtown Central $130,000 Precinct Leases and Utilities 3 of the new FTEs sunset with the GO Bond TOTAIS $392599240 18 funding,and some are covered with potential future state grant awards Disclaimer:For the chart above,staff didn't include a couple Youth&Family and Police Department multi-year grants since they would not create cost increases for the next annual budget. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 O REVISED TRANSMITTAL AND REVISED REVENUE AND FUND BALANCE CHARTS Amended Variance Favorable Revenue M2-M3 Annual Budget FY22-23 Amended Budget Revised Forecast (unfavorable} Property Taxes 125,012,927 125,012,927 125,012,927 - Sale and use Taxes 105,050,018 105,050,018 108,269,373 3,219,30 Franchise Taxes 11,657,129 11,657,128 11,640,553 116,575) Payment In Lleu of Taxes 1,638,222 1,638,222 1,639,222 - Total Taxes 243,3S8,295 243,359,295 246,561,080 3,202,785 Licensesand Permits 40,736,114 40,736,114 41,114;687 378,573 Intergovernmental Revenue 4,644,622 4,644,622 4,722,377 77,755 Interest Income 2,071,154 2,071,154 4,771,154 2,700,000 Fides %765,174 3,76S,174 3,817;666 S2,492 Parking Meter Coiiections 2,635,475 2,635,475 2,635,475 - Charges, Fees,and Rentals 4,432,794 4,432,794 4,897,307 454,513 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,438,710 3,439,710 3,857,347 419,637 Interfund Reimbursement 24,431,717 24,431,717 24,422,422 (9,295) Transfers 28,821,993 34,921,1393 34,829,993 192,000 Total W/O Special Tax 358,336 043 364,436,049 371,619,5M 7,183,460 AdditionaI Sales Tax(1f2%) 44,364,490 44,364,490 45,614,490 1,250,000 Total General Fund 402,700,538 408,800,538 417,n%9N 8,433,460 Revenue for FY2023 Budget Adjustments According to the Administration,the current projections for fiscal year 2023 projections continue to be positive.Actual sales tax revenue received is currently projected to exceed budget by$3.2 million while the sales tax associated with Funding Our Future is projected to exceed budget by$1.25 million. Building permits continue to stay strong projecting to be over budget by $378,573• Charges and services is projecting to be over budget because of strong numbers from police service revenues, while miscellaneous revenue shows an increase over budget due to an increase in fuel reimbursement costs.The City is also projecting a large surplus due to the rising interest rates. Staff Note Clarification: Other Police Services Revenue includes contractual agreements for the following:Jordan River Patrol,Task force UHP Crosswalk and Speed control,South Salt Lake,North Salt Lake.The agreement reimburses overtime for police officers who assist in the areas.There is an offsetting PD overtime expenditure. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 O Fund Balance The Administration's chart below shows the current General Fund Balance figures. I I I I Beginning Fund Balance I � I I Budgeted Change in Fund Balance I I I Prior Year Encumbrances Estimated Beginning Fund Balance I I I Beginning Fund Balance Percent I I I Year End CAFR Adjustments I I I Revenue Changes I I Expense Changes(Prepaids,Recmable.Etc) I I Fund Balance w/CAFR Changes I I Final Fund Balance Percent Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance I I 1 BA#1 Revenue Adjustment BA#1 Expense Adjustment BA#2 Revenue Adjustment I BA#2 Expense Adjustment BA#3 Revenue Adjustment BA#3 Expense Adjustment I I BA#4 Revenue Adjustment BA#4 Expense Adjustment BA#5 Revenue Adjustment I i BA#5 Expense Adjustment BA#6 Revenue Adjustment I I BA#6 Expense Adjustment I I BA#7 Revenue Adjustment I I BA#7 Expense Adjustment I I Change in Revenue Change in Expense I I Fund Balance Budgeted Increase Adjusted Fund Balance ' Adjusted Fund Balance Percent I I Proposed/Adopted Revenue CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 O Impact Fees Update The Administration's transmittal does not provide an updated summary of impact fee tracking.The information from Budget Amendment No.5 is copied below and is current as of 12/28/22.As a result,the City is on-track with impact fee budgeting to have no refunds during all of FY202�and FY2024.The Administration reports work is nearing completion to update the fire and parks sections of the impact fee plan.The transportation section was updated in October 202o.Eligible projects for police impact fees are being identified.Note that the below balances were updated based on the Council's Capital Improvement Program(CIP)project funding decisions. Type Unallocated Cash Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring "Available to Spend" Impact Fees Fire $1,479,222 More than a year away - Parks $12,150,505 More than a year away - Police $989�57 ore9 More than a year away - Transportation $4,182,237 M than a year away - Note:Encumbrances are an administrative function when impactfees are held under a contract Section A: New Items (Note: to expedite the processing of this staff report,staff has included the Administration's descriptions from the transmittal for some of these items) A-1: Rapid Intervention Team Trailer($25,000 from General Fund Balance to the Fleet Fund) The Administration is requesting one-time funding to purchase a second outfitted trailer for the Rapid Intervention Team.The additional trailer is expected to enable the team to spend less time waiting in line at the landfill by the team taking full trailer loads to the landfill when wait times are shorter. A-2: City Hall Earthquake Repairs($2.65 Million from General Fund Balance to the CIP Fund) These funds would be in addition to$9.2 million previously approved by the Council to repair damage from the 5.7 magnitude earthquake in March 2020.If approved as requested,then the project is expected to be fully funded.All of the expenses are expected to be reimbursed by insurance.The true cost would not be known until the project goes out to bid and receives proposals.The funding also includes ancillary costs such as protection of artworks, temporary office moves,and consultants.Repairs could take a year to be completed from the date of selecting a contractor bid. The Engineering Division has worked with the City's property insurance company(FM Global)on the full extent of needed repairs and associated cost estimates.Attachment 1 to the transmittal includes a breakout of these expenses. Note that the cost of inflation experienced since the earthquake will be covered by insurance. A-3: Fiber Conduit to Improve Connections between City Facilities as part of the 200 South Reconstruction Project($242,285 from the IMS Fund) The project would improve connections between City facilities downtown and on the Westside including the Airport,Pioneer Park,and multiple offices,and increase capacity for future needs.The Council approved$150,000 in the annual budget of which$1oo,000 is continuing the City Connect program and the remaining$50,000 is going to the fiber conduit improvements.There are potential benefits such as cost savings and reduced disruption to the neighborhood by including this project in the reconstruction of 200 South when underground utilities are more easily accessible to upgrade. ➢ The Administration has requested a straw poll for this item to avoid an upcoming price increase and to fit the project within the reconstruction schedule. A-4:Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal A-5: Public Safety Radio Replacements Cost Increases($2.4 Million from the IMS Fund) These are in addition to the$3.7 million from the IMS Fund approved as part of FY2023 CIP.The$6.1 million is for public safety handheld and mobile radio replacements,control stations,some special accessories for certain work CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 groups,removal of the old and installation of new equipment.IMS reports another$2 million is anticipated to be needed for similar replacements of non-public safety radios.Enterprise funds like the Airport and Public Utilities are budgeting to cover their radio equipment replacements. The Council separately funded$7.5 million for radio towers and related infrastructure in the 2022 sales tax revenue bond approved in Budget Amendment#4 last December. ➢ The Administration has requested a straw poll for this item to avoid a price increase later in March. A-6: Consulting to Create Enterprise Bill System Replacement for Public Utilities Billing System (PUBS) ($250,000 from the IMS Fund) PUBS was developed and expanded by IMS over the past two decades.The system is reaching end of life and needs to be replaced. Some General Fund departments use the system like Sustainability and Community and Neighborhoods in addition to Public Utilities(which is an enterprise fund).This funding is to hire a consultant evaluating the City's needs and recommending options to replace PUBS.Microsoft support for the current system is expected to end as soon as July 2024. A-7: Lindsey Gardens CIP Project Rescope($459,36o in the CIP Fund) The Public Lands Department is requesting a rescope of remaining funds to complete a reduced scope of work in response to cost increases.The primary scope change is renovating the concession stand instead of a full rebuild at a new location with new utility lines.The Department evaluated rebuilding a smaller and simpler concession stand at the current location but inflation resulted in cost estimates even higher than the original scope.The Avenues Baseball League previously donated$io,000 towards the project. The revised scope of work includes the following items in order of priority.The rescope may not be enough to fully fund all items.The Department would construct these items as far as the funding allows. - Concession stand renovation - Pedestrian path to middle field - Batting cage renovation - Covering dugouts with shade canopies - Trail from middle field to lower field The Council approved$557,000 in FY2o19 and FY2020 CIP for improvements to Lindsey Gardens baseball fields and pedestrian access. $97,640 was spent on design fees and engineering.The remaining balance would be rescoped. The following note was provided by the league President in support of the rescope request: This note is to confirm that the Board of Directors of the Avenues Baseball League(ABL)has been informed of and approved the changes to the scope of work at Lindsey Gardens.As president of the league,I have been involved with you,Dat,Preston,and others to change the scope of work and establish new priorities given the anticipated cost overruns after getting the bids for the original scope of work.I have communicated the revised scope of work and the priority of the projects to the ABL board. The board agrees with the priorities that we have discussed and is eager to get on with the project. Bart Cocke President,Avenues Baseball League A-8:Anonymous Donation for the Avenues City Cemetery($1 Million Donation) This item would recognize an anonymous donation to the City for cemetery maintenance and improvements. A-9: One-time Retention Bonuses and Ongoing Hiring Bonuses for Police Officers($4.3 Million from ARPA and$1,201,976 from General Fund Balance) The Police Department estimates three to seven years to reach full staffing based on current hiring and retention rates.This item would fund a new bonus program to incentivize longer retention of officers and faster hiring of new Page 18 officers.The bonus program is intended to stabilize staffing and help the Department reach full staffing within two years.Note that there are many unknowns outside the City's control when projecting when the Police Department could reach full staffing such as the number of qualified candidates applying,the state of the Wasatch Front metropolitan and national economies,officers on leave,crime rates,etc. The Police Department is seeking funding to provide one-time retention bonuses to existing police officers.The retention bonus would be$5,000 for officers who agree to continue employment for one-year or$8,000 for a two year commitment.The retention bonuses would be staggered by timing them to an employee's hiring date anniversary.Approximately$1 million would be needed in the next annual budget to continue the bonus program because of the design to stagger bonuses based on hiring date anniversaries.Retention bonuses would be paid to all existing sworn officers. The Department is also seeking funding to provide ongoing hiring bonuses of$1o,000 for lateral officers with a one year commitment and$5,000 for self-sponsored candidates of a qualifying POST-certified police academy.The self- sponsored candidates would still need to complete additional training specifically required by the Department. Hiring bonuses would require a one-year commitment to continue employment with the Department. If an officer leaves before their commitment period is completed,then a prorated amount of the bonus would need to be repaid.Employment separations for any reasons have occurred at all staffing levels.There does not appear to be a higher rate of vacancies at certain years of services or ranks. Funding for the bonuses includes pensionable costs that the Utah Retirement System requires municipalities contribute to public safety officers'retirement accounts.For example,the$1o,000 hiring bonus for a lateral officer also requires a$4,68o pension contribution for a total one-year cost to the City of$14,680. The Department reports there are currently 34 police officer vacancies and 26 civilian vacancies.At full staffing there would be 582 sworn officers and 148 civilian staff.The Department provided the below chart showing police officer separations over the past five years.It shows elevated separations from June 2020 to August 2021 and then a return to the five year trend in the past 18 months. Separations 60 Month Trendline Mar 2018 to Feb 2023 20 18 16 14 w 12 M H 10 8 6 t )6.- - I - :............... 4 .... .. ... .. ........ .... .. .. .. .... .. .. .. ...... ... .. .. .. .. . .. .... .. .. .. ..... ... ... ... .. .. IN V 2 0 00 00 OO 00 OD 01 01 O1 Of 01 Of O O O O O O rl 'i rl rl rl rl N N N N N N M ei ei ei ''I rl 'i 'y 'y ey 'i e•1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a A iO a � t:O a $ C g a C `m a g c f z f z 'A z A I z f f z If this item is approved,then the City's remaining ARPA funds would be$21,269,039.The City used over$31 million from ARPA for General Fund revenue loss in the last two annual budgets.The next annual budget for FY2024 is also expected to be eligible for$10 million or more revenue loss using ARPA.Other ongoing ARPA eligible expenses previously discussed by the Council that could be in the next annual budget are$792,195 for park rangers salary restoration and$252,150 for Grant Administrator and Economic Development FTEs.The Grant Administrator would be eligible for$207,167 in FY2025—FY2026.If ARPA funded all these items,then the remaining balance of ARPA would be$10,017,527.There may also be ARPA funds budgeted in prior years that were not spent and could be recaptured for new uses. (See policy question below). Page 19 Policy Questions: ➢ Larger Bonus and Shorter Commitment for Lateral Officers than Current Officers—The Council may wish to ask the Administration why lateral officers would be required to make a shorter commitment of one-year while receiving a larger bonus of$1o,000 compared to the retention bonus for existing officers which is $5,000 for a one-year commitment or$8,00o for a two-year commitment. ➢ Lateral Officer Retention and Resignation—Some Council Members asked are laterals more likely to stay in the department longer than new hires?And how long do laterals stay in the department?The Council may wish to ask the Administration to research these questions.At the time of publishing this staff report an answer was not readily available. ➢ Status of City ARPA Funds—The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration,or schedule a future briefing about,the City's remaining ARPA funds,needs in the next annual budget,and how much,if any, ARPA appropriations from past fiscal years were unused and available for recapture.The U.S.Treasury set a deadline of December 31,2024 for ARPA funds to be committed(such as budgeted and under a contract), and to be fully spent by the end of 2026. A-1o: Real Property Purchase($825,000 from General Fund Balance to the CIP Fund) The item would facilitate acquisition of real property.Per state law this is eligible to be discussed in a closed session. Discussions are ongoing and the Council may hold additional deliberations before considering whether to approve this funding. A-ii: Study to Create Downtown Main Street Pedestrian Mall Additional Funding($100,00o from General Fund Balance) In the FY2023 annual budget,the Council approved$150,000 from the RDA Central Business District project area for a study to create a pedestrian mall on Main Street between South Temple and 400 South.The Economic Development Department is requesting additional funding based on the final scope of work.Note that this is separate from actual implementation of the"open streets"concept.The study will look at options to close the street permanently or partially including potentially based on seasons,day of the week,and time of day. The scope of work includes examining the current street conditions,creating planning and design recommendations(including emergency vehicle access,maintenance,utilities access,accessibility considerations, operations and maintenance needs,landscaping,and drainage,etc.),visualizing concept designs,public outreach, and calculating a cost analysis for each future phase of the project. The Department indicates that they anticipate selecting the contractor in the late spring,with deliverables identified in the fall of 2023. Policy Questions: ➢ Scope of Work—The Council may wish to discuss whether the scope of work meets the Council's goals for the study. ➢ 202�Activation and Programming on Main Street Downtown—The Council approved funding the last few years to partially close Main Street from South Temple to 400 South on weekends between Memorial Day and Labor Day.There is currently no funding available to continue the program this coming summer.The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration what would be needed to continue the program this summer. Pandemic-related changes to state and city regulations are no longer in effect which previously help facilitate the program.See Council Added item I-1 for a placeholder to achieve some of these policy goals in the coming year. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section (None) Page I io Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section (None) Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Interest on General Obligation Series 2o1gA, Series 202o and Series 2021 General Obligation Bond Series 2019A,was issued in October 2019 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was$22,840,000.At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then,unspent bond proceeds have earned interest.This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including interest earned from September 2021 through November 2022. General Obligation Bond Series 2020,was issued in September 2020 to fund reconstruction of City streets.Par value of the issued bonds was$17,745,000.At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then,unspent bond proceeds have earned interest.This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including interest earned from September 2021 through November 2022.General Obligation Bonds Series 2021,was issued in November 2021 to fund reconstruction of City streets.Par value of the issued bonds was$20,600,000.At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then,unspent bond proceeds have earned interest.This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from December 2021 through November 2022. D-2: Steiner Roof Replacement—County and CIP Portions WITHDRAWN BY THE ADMINISTRATION D-3: 300 West Roadway Bond Adjustments Public Services Engineering Division is requesting to revise the second tranche of bond funds.The 300 West project —Cost Center 83-21201 is coming in under budget in the amount of$2,150,000.To ensure we utilize all of the bond funds before they expire,it is in our best interest to move these funds to Cost Center 83-21203 which is a Bond Contingency Cost Center.This will provide flexibility to use these funds on other approved bond projects within the bond's scope as funding is needed.The potential funding uses includes local street reconstruction candidates as listed below. • 600 S from goo W to Boo W at an initial estimated cost of$746,984 • 800 W from ARAPAHOE AV to 600 S at an initial estimated cost of$191,476 • 800 W from ARAPAHOE AV to 700 S at an initial estimated cost of$218,1og • goo S from 11oo E to 120o E at an initial estimated cost of$5o1,825 • BRYAN AVE from 800 E to goo E at an initial estimated cost of$310,153 • INDUSTRIAL RD from 2100 S to ASSOCIATED AV at an initial estimated cost of$401,643 • JEFFERSON ST from TERMINUS END to 1400 S at an initial estimated cost of$80,300 • KENSINGTON AVE from 800 E to goo E at an initial estimated cost of$3o8,933 • LIBERTY AVE from LAKE ST to 800 E at an initial estimated cost of$81,454 • ROOSEVELT AVE from 600 E to 70o E at an initial estimated cost of$239,128 D-4: Insurance Funds for City and County Building/Earthquake Damage Public Services'Engineering division has been working with the City's Insurance carrier(FM Global)to receive funding for earthquake damages to the City and County building.The amount has been agreed to and is currently being processed.This amendment allows for the revenue to be recorded and the corresponding expense budget of $7,252,300. D-5: IMS Budget for New General Fund Positions Budget was approved for a$207,000 general fund transfer to IMS for the cost of hardware for newly funded general fund positions,but the budget for the revenue coming in from the general fund and the expenditure on the hardware was inadvertently left out of the IMS budget.This amendment will rectify that mistake. D-6: Real Property Purchase—CIP Budget Associated with BA#4 Council-Added Initiative In budget amendment#4 the Council added a general fund budget of$3,567,564 for a real property purchase. Typically,real property purchases are budgeted in a CIP cost center in order for the asset to be capitalized.This amendment will add the necessary CIP budget for the purchase. Page 111 D-7:Move Cost of Bond Issuance Costs from CIP to Debt Service Fund Class Per GASB 65,the cost of issuance for bonds is a non-capital expense.The cost of issuance budgets for General Obligation Bonds,Series 2022,and Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds,Series 2022 C Federally Taxable were recorded in Fund Class 83 CIP.Fund Class 83 CIP is reserved for capital expense.The proper accounting treatment for cost of issuance expense budgets is to record them in Fund Class 81 Debt Service.This budget amendment proposes to move the approved cost of issuance non-capital budgets from Fund Class 83 CIP to Fund Class 81 Debt Service. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1:Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance Program 2 Additional Resources($4 Million Grant) This budget amendment is to recognize the City's additional allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act,Treasury Emergency Rent Assistance Program 2(ERAP 2)funds,in the amount of$4,000,000,for the purpose of assisting in the stabilization and recovery of COVID-affected,low-income renters in Salt Lake City.All ERAP 2 funds must be obligated by September 30,2025. The Administration is proposing to split the funds into two uses: - $2 million for rental assistance including security deposits,utilities,and past due amounts,and - $2 million for a public competitive application process to fund eligible housing stability services provided by community-based organizations which include: o Case management, o Eviction prevention and diversion programs, o Mediation between landlords and tenants, o Housing counseling including Fair Housing Act protections and requirements, o Housing navigators or promotors that help households access emergency rental assistance programs or find housing, o Housing related services for survivors of domestic abuse or human trafficking, o Legal services or attorney's fees related to eviction proceedings and maintaining housing stability, and o Specialized services for individuals with disabilities or seniors that support their ability to access or maintain housing. The Utah Rent Relief program and website rentrelie£utah.gov stopped accepting applications on February 5, 2023. The$2 million proposed for rental assistance would go through the Utah Rent Relief program to fund applications submitted before the deadline. This budget amendment is separate from previous Council-approved City ERAP allocations: ERAP 1 Initial Award ($6,067,033),ERAP 1 Additional Allocation($3,000,000),ERAP 1 Additional Allocation($5,000,000),and ERAP 2 Initial Award($4,800,559.40). $1,031,336 from the earlier ERAP 2 award are still available and expected to be spent this year.All ERAP 1 funds had a spending deadline of December 29,2022. Policy Questions: ➢ Prioritizing between Rent Assistance and Housing Stability Services—The Council may wish to discuss how to prioritize the$4 million of additional funding among the eligible uses listed above. ➢ Delegating Authority for Final Funding Decision—Does the Council want to delegate authority for the Administration to make final funding decisions on awards to providers of eligible housing stability services or retain final funding decision making authority after receiving funding recommendations from an advisory board and Mayor? Section F: Donations (None) Page 112 Section G: Council Consent Agenda No.5 G-i: Know Your Neighbor Grant Program,Open Society Foundation-Salt Lake County($61,000 from Miscellaneous Grants) The Mayor's Office of Equity&Inclusion received$61,000 in grant funding from Salt Lake County as a pass through from the County's application to the Operation Afghan Resettlement Support(OARS)program.The County was awarded$150,000 and is requesting to partner with Salt Lake City's Know Your Neighbor Program to assist the County in assimilating and welcoming the Afghan Refugees.The funding will be used to hire a new part-time program coordinator and not more than$1,000 for the program coordinator to travel for program related purposes. No match is required.A public hearing will be held for this grant application on 1o/18/2022. G-2: Utah State Office of Education,Child and Adult Care Food Program-Youth After School Programs($46,000 from Miscellaneous Grants) The Youth&Family Division of Public Services applied for and received a continuation grant offered annually by the Utah State Office of Education,under the Child and Adult Care Food Program.These funds are available to youth service providers as part of the At-Risk Snack Program to reimburse for the costs of snacks served to children participating in the after-school programs.Central City Recreation Center,Fairmont Park,Glendale Library, Liberty Park,Northwest Rec.Center,Ottinger Hall,the Youth and Family Division Office,and Sorenson Campus will receive reimbursement directly through the State Office of Education and will receive up to$46,000,based on qualified snack expenses.SLC is reimbursed on a monthly basis and only qualified healthy snacks and meals served to children participating in the after-school enrichment/education activities during the afterschool program hours are eligible for reimbursement.A public hearing was held for the grant application on 10/4/2022. Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 6 G-i: U S Department of Justice,Community Oriented Policing Services(COPS),FY22 Community Police Development(CPD)Grant The Police department applied for and received a$24,170 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice,Community Oriented Policing Services through the FY22 Community Policing Development Grant.The grant will fund an evaluation for the Promising Youth Project.The project will fund training and curriculum recommended by the evaluation contractor.The Police Department will develop an evaluation that will provide four major services: Evaluation of Program Fidelity,Evaluation of Program Outcomes,Training and Technical Assistance,and development of a Final Report.A Public Hearing was held on o7/19/2022 for the grant application on this award. Section I: Council Added Items Placeholder I-i: Downtown Streets Enhanced Activation($5oo,000*from General Fund Balance) Some Council Members expressed interest in funding enhanced street activation in the downtown area particularly during the summer.Additional discussion and work would be needed to determine what types of activation activities would be eligible for this funding and feasible within the months before the summer.(*$5oo,000 is a placeholder and actual amount needed will depend on identifying activities and times) I-2:Technology Upgrades in the Committee of the Whole and Formal Chamber Rooms($8o,000 from General Fund Balance) These one-time funds would be for additional technology improvements to the two rooms the Council uses for open and public meetings.Many of the upgrades are related to communication and network equipment needed to successfully run hybrid meetings.The funds may also be used for removable ADA accessibility ramps in the Formal Chamber. I-3: Physical Security Improvements to City Hall($1-3 Million from General Fund Balance to CIP Fund Holding Account) These one-time funds would be used for additional physical security improvements to City Hall.The funds would be placed into a holding account pending specific project proposals to use the funds.The amount is a placeholder based on previous Council discussions/estimates and is not based on cost estimates for specific projects. I-4: "Lockhart Alley"Reconstructing Three Sections($208,373 from General Fund Balance to CIP Fund) Page 113 These one-time funds would be used to reconstruct three sections of the alley from 1300 South to Kensington.The alley is located between Major Street and State Street.The funds would address drainage issues and repaving.The funding does not include fencing,lighting,or other enhancements. Policy Questions: ➢ Status of Alley Programs and Funding—The Council may wish to ask the Administration how much funding remains from the special pilot program funded two years ago,and the alley maintenance funding from FY2023 CIP.Both prior appropriations could also be used for this project. ➢ Fencing,Lighting,and Other Potential Needs—The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether additional funding is needed beyond addressing pavement and drainage issues along this alley,and whether Public Utilities has funding that could be contributed to the project. ATTACHMENTS (none) ACRONYMS ABL—Avenues Baseball League BA—Budget Amendment CIP—Capital Improvement Program COPS—Community Oriented Policing Services CPD—Community Police Development Grant ERAP—Emergency Rental Assistance Program FY—Fiscal Year FOF—Funding Our Future GASB—Governmental Accounting Standards Board GF—General Fund IMS—Information Management Services OARS—Operation Afghan Resettlement Support Program POST—Police Officer Standards and Training PUBS—Public Utilities Bulling System RDA—Redevelopment Agency Page 14 Salt Lake City Sales Tax *Local Sales and Use Tax ; City revenue is about 73% of tax at POS 1% Referred to as General Sales Tax Funding Our Future : 59% of Local Sales and Use revenue 0.5% County Option Sales Tax : 9% of Local Sales and Use revenue for Transportation 0.25% L 'A M This Presentation is focused primarily on the 1%, Local Sales and Use Tax. SLC receives about 73 cents per dollar of POS for Local Sales and Use Tax. Funding our Future and County Option Transportation Sales Tax are collected similar to the main Local Sales Tax because most businesses are charged All 3 taxes at POS. The exception being that some businesses are exempted depending on the Industry or NAICS code they fall in. These Percentages are summed into the 7.75% sales tax that is applied to taxable sales. The remaining 6% portion is tax revenue distributed to other Governmental Entities (State, County, UTA, etc) The values presented in the later slides are strictly Local Sales and Use tax. You can estimate Funding our Future and CO transportation by applying these percentages to the Local Sales and Use Values. 2 The following slides will primarily focus on Local Sales and Use *Local Sales and Use Tax 1% Referred to as General Sales Tax 3 General Sales Tax Actuals are expected to rise 0.5%by the end of FY 2023 after increasing 17%from 2022-2021 and 11%from 2021-2020 FY 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023P Actuals 61,864,444 64,897,427 66,324,138 73,778,034 86,532,634 87,000,000 Actual Growth From Prior Year 8% 5% 2% 11% 17% 0.5% Budgets 58,016,887 62,950,961 65,350,000 62,049,593 68,119,999 83,500,000 Budget Growth From Prior Year 7% 9% 4% -5% 10% 23% 1aa,0oo,000 90,aaa,0oo M'"'ON 70,",OW s0,aa0,0ao a0,aa0,0ao — 30,000,OOo 20,",OW — 10,000,Oao 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ❑Budget Actuals ■Forecast From 2018-2022,average Actual growth was 8.6%and Budget growth was 5% Currently only have 6 months of sales tax actuals for FY23. We anticipate Local Sales Tax to come in a little higher than last year. This is a noticeable change and a major slowdown compared to recent years. Certain Economic Factors that are causing us to tap the breaks a bit on our future projections. 4 Six Major Sectors account for 81%of the general sales tax revenue Top 6 Sectors FY 2022 FY 2023 Jul-Dec+projection Sector Name sales—credit PY Difference Y/Y%Ch%of Total YTD sales_credit PY Difference Y/Y%Ch%ofTotal Retail Trade 33,222,795 4,257,871 10% 38.4% 33,937,330 714,535 2% 39.0% Wholesale Trade 11,526,162 1,838,327 13% 13.3% 11,862,637 336,474 3% 13.6% Accommodation and Food Services 9,877,229 4,382,937 49% 11.4% 10,785,046 907,817 9% 12.49/ Manufacturing 5,584,234 1,033,516 16% 6.5% 6,230,342 646,108 12% 7.2% Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 4,192,474 1,115,793 25% 4.8% 3,378,819 (813,654) -19% 3.9% Information 3,611,016 763,536 19% 4.2% 4,095,911 484,895 13% 4.7% Total 68,013,911 13,391,980 22% 79% 70,290,086 2,276,175 3% 81% FY 2023 Other sectors Retail Trade Retail Trade Dominates the Sectors with over 39%of Information the Sales Tax generated Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Manufacturing Accommodatio n and Food Wholesale Services ,Jade 1 � � 4��� Most Major Sectors are growing at a healthily pace with the exception being the sales tax coming from Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Retail Sales = 39% Wholesale Trade = 13.6% Accommodation and Food Services = 12.4% Manufacturing = 7.2% Information = 4.7% Real Estate and Rental and Leasing = 3.9% 5 Quarterly General Sales Tax Revenue $25,000,000 $22,971,530 $21,519,357 $16,475,354 $17,808,167 $18,091,871 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ■Qtr3 ■Qtr4 ■Qtrl ■Qtr2 'Illt- Values shown are 4th Quarter Sales (Oct-Dec). 6 Quarterly General Sales Tax Revenue by Major Sector $2sp0opoo $20p0opoo Sls,aOo,aoo - .aner se�tory •Real Estate and Rental and Leasing ■Information •Mand U,,ing $10,000,000 •Accommodation and Food Services •Wholesale Trade •Retail Trade $5,000,000 - $0 - ". .. .. .. .. Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtrl Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtrl Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtrl Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtrl Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 2019 2020 2021 2022 2W3 2023 Retail Sales = 39% Wholesale Trade = 13.6% Accommodation and Food Services = 12.4% Manufacturing = 7.2% Information = 4.7% Real Estate and Rental and Leasing = 3.9% 7 Number of General Sales Tax Accounts a0,aa0 70,RR0 Total 60,000 •Other Revenue 50,000 •Real Estate and Rental and Leasing q0 000 •Accommodation and Food Services ■Information 30,000 •Mand U,,ing 20,000 •Wholesale Trade 10,000 •Retail Trade 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 FY23 YTD Comparison Jul-Dec aa,aa0 35,000 30,000 ___-- 25, -__ 000 —- 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 MLI Number of Sales Tax Accounts is the count of businesses that pay sales tax. Growth is staying healthy. The number of Sales Tax Accounts are consistent with the revenue values. These trends continue to stay strong and is a good indicator the economy is still expanding. 8 Quarterly Number of General Sales Tax Businesses by Major Sector 25,000 .-... .-...-... .-...-... .-....... .-......- .......-. ......-. zo,000 ■Other Sectors 15,000 ■Real Estate and Rental and Leasing ■Information ■Manufacturing 10,000 ■Accommodation and Food Services ■Wholesale Trade ■Retail Trade 5,000 o r Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtrl Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtrl Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Quarterly Count Comparisons 9 Quarterly Number of General Sales Tax Businesses 25,000 21,298 20,191 20po0 17,779 1],8]1 16,468 16,362 15,000 14,224 14,437 14,65] 12,925 12,744 4] 12,024 12,221 012 9,880 10,388 10,000 8,5]0 5,000 0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ■QV3 ■Qtr4■Qhl ■Q[t2 Quarterly Count Comparisons 10 General Sales Tax 3 Year Outlook $9s,000,aa0 Current Year Confidence Intervals—FY 2023 Reference Forecast Amount $90,00o,000 Projected FY20 $ 87,000,000 $85,00o,000 Bu dget FY2023-- $ 83,500,000 $8o,000,aa0 to 95%Confiden $ 81,334,429 to 80%Confidence $ 83,322,582 $75,000,000 Average Forecast $ 87,078,293 $70,000,000 Hi 80%Confidence $ 90,834,004 Hi 95%Confidence $ 92,822,157 $65,00o,000 $60,00o,000 $5 5,000,000 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 'The average forecast falls in line with the model forecast. 'Models are trained and tested strictly on historical values.The Actuals can change based on other economic impacts(past,present,or future)that are not calculated in the model. r Salt Lake City Sales Tax outlook. The average modeled forecast falls inline with the analysts most recent revenue projections. Models are trained and tested strictly on historical values. An ETS model was chosen as having the highest confidence compared to Naive and Arima models. Future actual revenue can change based on other economic impacts (past, present, or future) that are not calculated in the model. 11 Appendix woo 12 Appendix A All Sectors FY 2022 FY 2023 Jul-Dec Pmjection Sector Name sales credit PY Difference Y %Ch%of Total YTD sales_credit PY Difference Y/Y%Ch%of Total Retail Trade 33,222,795 4,257,871 10% 38.4% 33,937,330 714,535 2% 39.0% Wholesale Trade 11,526,162 1,838,327 13% 13.3% 11,862,637 336,474 3% 13.6% Accommodation and Food Services 9,877,229 4,382,937 49% 11.4% 10,785,046 907,817 9% 12.4% Manufacturing 5,584,234 1,033,516 16% 6.5% 6,230,342 646,108 12% 7.2% Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 4,192,474 1,115,793 25% 4.8% 3,378,819 (813,654) -19% 3.9% Information 3,611,016 763,536 19%. 4.2% 4,095,911 494,895 13% 4.7% Utilities 2,299,223 432,553 16% 2.7% 2,578,396 279,173 12% 3.0% Other Services(except Public Administration) 2,579,846 274,687 9% 3.091 2,414,665 (165,181) -6% 2.8% Professional,Scientific,and Technical Services 2,312,139 359,098 13% 2.70/6 2,635,063 322,923 14% 3.0% Noncategorized 3,773,776 3,109,665 157% 4.49/ (64,917) (3,838,693) -102% -0.1% Arts,Entertainment,and Recreation 1,522,194 1,434,127 231% 1.89/ 1,735,674 213,479 14% 2.0% Administrative and Support and Waste Managem 2,172,642 (146,858) -5% 2.5% 2,317,696 145,054 7% 2.7% Construction 1,376,897 124,042 7% 1.69/ 2,106,485 729,588 53% 2.4% Motor Vehicle 671,754 53,492 69/ 0.8% 653,137 (18,617) -3% 1 0.89' Finance and Insurance 489,179 65,504 11% 0.61/ 457,973 (31,206) -6% 0.5% Educational Services 403,689 214,707 6591 0.5% 414,952 11,264 3% 0.59, Transportation and Warehousing 430,110 104,797 22% 0.5% 733,425 303,315 71% 0.81/. Special Events 210,305 233,661 466% 0.2% 320,505 110,200 52% 0.4% Mining,Quarrying,and Oil and Gas Extraction 81,419 (5,430) -5% 0.1% 122,701 41,283 51% 0.11/. Health Care and Social Assistance 128,142 38,854 29% 0.1% 102,286 (25,855) -20% 0.1% Management of Companies and Enterprises 57,112 (18,793) -20% 0.19, 101,343 44,231 77% 0.1% Public Administration 19,015 17,605 219% 0.01/ 78,725 59,710 314% 0.1% Agriculture,Forestry,Fishing and Hunting 3,425 2,152 87% 1 0.091 1 1,806 1 (1,619) -47% 1 0.0% Total 7 86,544,776 19,685,844 63% 100% 87,000,000 4552 22% 100% 13 Appendix B 6,628,312 6,303,614 324,698 105% 7,775,910 6,810,737 965,173 114% 8,275,551 7,359,961 915,590 112% 7,044,653 6,177,909 866,744 114% 7,808,061 6,756,611 1,051,450 116% 8,118,817 8,230,246 (111,429) 99% 6,355,955 0% 6,141,029 0% 7,782,132 0•l/0 6,808,856 0% 6,602,133 0% 8,170,817 0% 45,651,304 83,50Q000 110% 14 ERIN MENDENHALL MARY BETH THOMPSON Mayor Chief Financial Officer Pr *4 ,P nEPARTh <wFD&= CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Lis (F&14,2023 15:21 MST) Date Received: 02/14/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 02/14/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 14', 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Budget Amendment#5 - Revised SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director(801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson(801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY2022-23 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REyENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND 0.00 4,451,976.00 CIP FUND 14,216,233.99 14,216,233.99 IMS FUND 3,099,185.00 3,099,185.00 MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS FUND 4,131,170.00 8,431,170.00 DoNATioN FUND 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 DEBT SERVICE FUND 334,957.90 334,957.90 TOTAL $22,781,546.89 $31,533,522.89 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 238 PO BOX 145467,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2022-23 Budget Adjustments The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2023. Amended Variance Favorable Revenue FY22-FY23 Annual Budget FY22-23 Amended Budget Revised Forecast (Unfavorable) Property Taxes 125,012,927 125,012,927 125,012,927 - Sale and Use Taxes 105,050,018 105,050,018 108,269,378 3,219,360 Franchise Taxes 11,657,128 11,657,128 11,640,553 (16,575) Payment in Lieu of Taxes 1,638,222 1,638,222 1,638,222 - TotalTaxes 243,358,295 243,358,295 246,561,080 3,202,785 Licenses and Permits 40,736,114 40,736,114 41,114,687 378,573 Intergovernmental Revenue 4,644,622 4,644,622 4,722,377 77,755 Interest Income 2,071,154 2,071,154 4,771,154 2,700,000 Fines 3,765,174 3,765,174 3,817,666 52,492 Parking Meter Collections 2,635,475 2,635,475 2,635,475 - Charges,Fees,and Rentals 4,432,794 4,432,794 4,887,307 454,513 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,438,710 3,438,710 3,857,347 418,637 Interfund Reimbursement 24,431,717 24,431,717 24,422,422 (9,295) Transfers 28,821,993 34,921,993 34,829,993 (92,000 Total W/O Special Tax 358,336,048 364,436,048 371,619,508 7,183,460 Additional Sales Tax(1/2%) 44,364,490 44,364,490 45,614,490 1,250,000 Total General Fund 402,700,538 408,800,538 417,233,998 8,433,460 The current projections for fiscal year 2023 projections continue to be positive. Sales tax is currently projected to exceed budget by$3.2 million while the sales tax associated with Funding Our Future is projected to exceed budget by $1.25 million. Building permits continue to stay strong projecting to be over budget by $378,573. Charges and services is projecting to be over budget because of strong numbers from police service revenues, while miscellaneous revenue shows an increase over budget due to an increase in fuel reimbursement costs. The City is also projecting a large surplus due to the rising interest rates. Fund balance has been updated with information from the 2022 ACFR, including proposed changes for BA#5 fund balance would be projected as follows for FY2023: MIN Beginning Fund Balance �' •• • Budgeted Change in Fund Balance Prior Year Encumbrances ' • ' '' '�' �' Estimated Beginning Fund Balance • • I 63,603 Beginning Fund Balance Percent Year End CAFR Adjustments I Revenue Changes poor Expense Changes(Prepaids,Receivable,Etc.) • •• , I ' Fund Balance w/CAFR Changes I Final Fund Balance Percent 1' I ' •% Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance I BA#1 Revenue Adjustment I BA#1 Expense Adjustment I BA#2 Revenue Adjustment BA#2 Expense Adjustment I BA#3 Revenue Adjustment , Ill off I 6,000,000 BA#3Expense Adjustment BA#4 Revenue Adjustment 0 00 0 I e 1 00 BA#4 Expense Adjustment I I I I BA#5 Revenue Adjustment BA#5 Expense Adjustment BA#6 Revenue Adjustment I I BA#6 Expense Adjustment I I I BA#7 Revenue Adjustment I BA#7 Expense Adjustment I Change in Revenue Change in Expense I Fund Balance Budgeted Increase I Adjusted Fund Balance ' Adjusted Fund Balance Percent .. I I I I I Proposed/Adopted Revenue Adjusted fund balance is projected to be at 23.34%. The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $22,781,546.89 of revenue and expense of$31,533,522.89. The amendment proposes changes in six funds, with one FTE. The amendment also includes the use of$4,451,976.00 from the General Fund fund balance. The proposal includes twenty-one initiatives for Council review. A summary spreadsheet document, outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget opening is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards 1. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Fifth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-2023) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2022 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2022, and Ending June 30, 2023. In June of 2022, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2023, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City's Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2022. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of 12023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Approved As To Form (SEAL) Jaysen OOld'rooyyd Bill No. of 2023. Published: 2 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#5 Administration Proposed Council Approved One- InitiativeExpenditure Expenditure Ongoing or Amount Section A: New Items i Rapid Intervention Team Trailer GF 25,000.00 One-time - 2 City and County Building Earthquake GF - 2,300,000.00 One-time - Repairs-General Fund Supplement 2 City and County Building Earthquake CIP 2,300,000.00 2,300,000.00 One-time Repairs-General Fund Supplement 3 Fiber Conduit Phase 2-200 S. IMS 242,185.00 242,185.00 One-time 4 Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal 5 Public Safety Radio Cost Increase IMS 2,400,000.00 2,400,000.00 One-time 6 Consulting for the Enterprise Billing IMS 250,000.00 250,000.00 One-time Systems 7 Lindsey Gardens CIP Project Rescope CIP - (402,938.57) One-time 7 Lindsey Gardens CIP Project Rescope CIP - (56,421.90) One-time 7 Lindsey Gardens CIP Project Rescope CIP - 459,36o.47 One-time 8 Donation for the Cemetery Donation 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 One-time 9 Bonuses for Police POST Training, Misc Grants - 4,300,000.00 One-time Recruitment and Retention 9 Bonuses for Police POST Training, GF - 1,201,976.00 Ongoing - Recruitment and Retention 10 Real Property Purchase GF - 825,000.00 One-time 10 Real Property Purchase CIP 825,000.00 825,000.00 One-time 11 Main Street Pedestrian Mall Conceptual GF - 100,000.00 One-time Design Study Section B:Grants for Existing Staff Resource Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources 1 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#5 Section D: Housekeeping 1 Interest on General Obligation Series 2o19A, CIP 62,203.69 62,203.69 One-time - Series 202o and Series 2021 1 Interest on General Obligation Series 2o19A, CIP 222,627.19 222,627.19 One-time Series 202o and Series 2021 1 Interest on General Obligation Series 2o19A, CIP 321,497.01 321,497.01 One-time Series 202o and Series 2021 2 Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal 3 300 West Roadway Bond Adjustments CIP - (2,150,000.00) One-time 3 300 West Roadway Bond Adjustments CIP 2,150,000.00 One-time - Insurance Funds for City and County 4 Building CIP 7,252,300.00 7,252,300.00 One-time - 5 IMS Budget for New GF Positions IMS 207,000.00 207,000.00 One-time Real Property Purchase-CIP Budget 6 Associated with BA#4 Council-Added CIP 3,567,564.00 3,567,564.00 One-time - Initiative Move Cost of Issuance Costs from CIP to CIP 1 0 1 One-time 7 Debt Service Fund Class ( 94 957.9 ) ( 94 957.90) Move Cost of Issuance Costs from CIP to Debt Service 1 0 One-time 7 Debt Service Fund Class 94,957.90 1 94 957.9 7 Move Cost of Issuance Costs from CIP to CIP (140,000.00) (140,000.00) One-time Debt Service Fund Class 7 Move Cost of Issuance Costs from CIP to Debt Service 140,000.00 140,000.00 One-time Debt Service Fund Class Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resource 1 Treasury ERAP 2 Additional Resources Misc Grants 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 One-time - 2 FY 2O23 Budget Amendment#5 Section G: Council Consent Agenda--Grant Awards Consent Agenda#5 1 Know Your Neighbor Grant Program,Open Misc Grants 61,000.00 61,000.0o One-time Society Foundation-Salt Lake County Utah State Office of Education,Child and 2 Adult Care Food Program-Youth After Misc Grants 46,000.00 46,000.0o One-time School Programs Consent Agenda#6 1 U S Department of Justice,Community Misc Grants 24,170.00 24,170.00 One-time - Oriented Policing Services(COPS),FY22 Community Police Development(CPD) Grant Section I: Council Added Item Total of Budget Amendment Items 22,781,546.89 31,533,522.89 - Administration Proposed Council Approved Expenditure Expenditure Ongoing or One- Initiative Total by Fund Class,BudgetAmendment# General Fund GF - 4,451,976.00 CIP Fund CIP 14,216,233.99 14,216,233.99 IMS Fund IMS 3,099,185.00 3,099,185.00 Miscellaneous Grant Fund Misc Grants 4,131,170.00 8,431,170.00 Donation Fund Donation 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 Debt Service Fund Debt Service 334,957.90 334,957.90 Total of Budget Amendment Items 22 781 546.89 31 533 522.8 3 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#5 Current Year Budget Summary,provided for information only FY2022-23 Budget,Including BudgetAntendments FY 2022-23 BA#i Total BA#2 Total BA#3 Total BA#4 Total BA#5 Total Total Revenue Adopted General Fund(FC io) 425,537,408 100,000 6,000,000 194,600 431,832,008 Curb and Gutter(FC 20) 3,000 3,000 DEA Task Force Fund(FC 41) 1,762,560 1,762,560 Misc Special Service Districts(FC 46) 1,700,000 1,700,000 Street Lighting Enterprise(FC 48) 4,302,222 4,302,222 Water Fund(FC 51) 108,196,368 36,680,000 260,687 145,137,055 Sewer Fund(FC 52) 196,630,907 196,630,907 Storm Water Fund(FC 53) 13,476,733 13,476,733 Airport Fund(FC 54,55,56) 302,268,600 302,268,600 Refuse Fund(FC 57) 21,458,105 21,458,105 Golf Fund(FC 59) 11,560,676 25,700 11,586,376 E-911 Fund(FC 60) 3,925,000 3,925,000 Fleet Fund(FC 61) 28,826,992 120,000 1,119,900 30,066,892 IMS Fund(FC 65) 30,523,167 2,627,420 3,099,185 3692499772 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation(FC 69) 9,600,000 9,600,000 CDBG Operating Fund(FC 71) 4,670,517 4,670,517 Miscellaneous Grants(FC 72) 34,158,918 2,749,584 2,517,995 8,103,151 4,131,170 51,66o.8i8 Other Special Revenue(FC 73) 300,000 300,000 Donation Fund(FC 77) 2,920,250 20,000 44,668 1,000,000 3,984,918 Housing Loans&Trust(FC 78) 16,217,000 16,2179000 Debt Service Fund(FC 81) 32,037,989 (2,951,727) 334,958 299421,220 CIP Fund(FC 83,84&86) 35,460,387 6,603,019 5,267,217 91,967,958 14,216,234 153,514,815 Governmental Immunity(FC 85) 3,964,523 2,000,000 500,000 694647523 Risk Fund(FC 87) 54,679,000 .34,679,000 Total of Budget Amendment Items 19344,180,322 11,592,603 51,009,880 101,347,689 22,781,547 1,530,912,041 4 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#5 Current Year Budget Summary,provided for information only FI'2022-23 Budget,Including BudgetAmendments ExpenseTotal Expense BA#i Total BA#2 Total BA#3 Total BA#4 Total BA#5 Total Total General Fund(FC io) 425,537,408 847,540 6,538,000 7,584,328 4,451,976 444,959,252 Curb and Gutter(FC 20) 3,000 3,000 DEA Task Force Fund(FC 41) 1,762,560 1,762,560 Misc Special Service Districts(FC 46) 1,700,000 1,700,000 Street Lighting Enterprise(FC 48) 5,757,825 5,757,825 Water Fund(FC 51) 132,752,815 36,680,000 260,687 16g,693,502 Sewer Fund(FC 52) 255,914,580 255,914,580 Storm Water Fund(FC 53) 18,699,722 18,699,722 Airport Fund(FC 54,55,56) 384,681,671 688,818,000 1,073,499,671 Refuse Fund(FC 57) 24,952,672 3,035,700 27,988,372 Golf Fund(FC 59) 14,726,016 46,800 14,772,816 E-911 Fund(FC 60) 3,800,385 3,800,385 Fleet Fund(FC 61) 30,426,032 4,011,36o io,678,500 45,115,892 IMS Fund(FC 65) 30,523,167 2,782,449 3,099,185 36,404,8oi County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for 9,458,748 9,458,748 Transportation(FC 69) CDBG Operating Fund(FC 71) 4,958,433 4,958,433 Miscellaneous Grants(FC 72) 26,614,153 2,749,584 2,517,995 8,481,711 8,431,170 48,794,613 Other Special Revenue(FC 73) 300,000 300,000 Donation Fund(FC 77) 287,250 20,000 44,668 1,000,000 1,351,918 Housing Loans&Trust(FC 78) 25,779,253 100,000 25,8799253 Debt Service Fund(FC 81) 33,658,558 (2,951,727) 334,958 31,041,789 CIP Fund(FC 83,84&86) 35,460,387 11,713,917 12,267,217 96,317,958 14,216,234 169,975,713 Governmental Immunity(FC 85) 3,169,767 2,000,000 500,000 5,669,767 Risk Fund(FC 87) 54,679,000 54,679,000 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,525,603,402 21,442,401 688,8i8,000 61,583,580 123,200,706 31,533,523 29452,i81,612 Budget Manager Analyst,City Council Contingentpp ip i 5 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount ection A:New Ite A-i: Rapid Intervention Team Trailer GF $25,000.00 Department:Public Services Prepared By:Jim Cleland For questions please include:Jim Cleland, Jorge Chammoro The Rapid Intervention Team has been in operation since July,2022. Improvements in the processes and procedures had led to the need for one more trailer. The team begins at 6:wain and immediately go to the landfill. They begin their remediations at around 7:3oam and usually fill one trailer by ii:ooam. By this time the wait at the SLC Landfill is approximately 2 hours. There is not enough time in the day for two trips to the landfill. With a second trailer they can fill both trailers by 2:00 PM and be ready to dump again in the morning.A second trailer outfitted is estimated at $25,000. A-2: City and County Building Earthquake Repairs — GF $2,300,000.00 General Fund Supplement CIP $2,300,000.00 Department:Public Services Prepared By:Dustin Petersen For questions please include: Dustin Petersen,Jorge Chammoro,City Engineer Public Services Engineering has been working with the City's insurance company(FM Global)on being fronted funding for repairs to the City and County Building.The Insurance company will only reimburse loss items as assessed on date of loss(March 2020).As with many city contracts the expenses have increased from the time of the event. Budget Amendment is requesting supplemental funds from the General Fund,to ensure contracts can be executed according to the full extent of repairs needed.Upon project completion,any unused funds will be returned to the General Fund. A current list of earthquake expenses is included as an attachment at the end of the document(Attachment#1) A-3: Fiber Conduit Phase 2-200 S IMS $242,i85.00 Department:IMS Prepared By:Joseph Anthony For questions please include:Aaron Bentley,Joseph Anthony This is part of the 200 south roadway project.The projected costs are more than anticipated and budgeted.The council approved$5ok as part of the FY23 budget,but the actual costs based on the current engineering estimate are $292,185. Therefore,we are requesting an increase to the budget for the difference of$242,185.This will allow the city to improve our connection between city offices and the airport as well as pioneer park. A-4:Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal A-5: Public Safety Radio Cost Increases IMS $2,400,000.00 Department:IMS Prepared By:Joseph Anthony For questions please include:Aaron Bentley,Joseph Anthony Due to an updated quote from Motorola we are requesting an increase in the budget for the radios in the amount of 2.4 Million.This money will come from the IMS Fund balance.Please see the attached quote for the details (Attachment #2). Administration would like to request a straw poll on this item.The straw poll is being requested because it's imperative the Administration move forward on the contract process to avoid a further 8%increase in the cost of the radios. 1 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount A-6: Consulting for the Enterprise Billing Systems IMS $250,000.00 Department:IMS Prepared By:Joseph Anthony For questions please include:Aaron Bentley,Joseph Anthony This request is for consulting services for Enterprise Billing systems for PUBS which is primarily used by Sustainability and Public Utilities.PUBS Needs to be replaced and the consultant will do an analysis of the City's needs and compare that to best practices and make a recommendation on where the city should be moving with regards to future decisions. Microsoft's current roadmap has our current solution mapped at the end of life by FY 2025.As such,we need to start finding a solution in this fiscal year to be able to have it in place by the beginning of FY 2025. The cost is based on an estimated i,000 that will be needed for the consultation at$250 per hour.It is estimated to be a total of$250,000. A-7: Lindsey Gardens CIP Project Rescope CIP -$402,93g•57 CIP -$56,421.90 CIP $459,36o•47 Department:Public Lands Prepared By:Kyle Shields For questions please include: Kristin Riker,Kyle Shields, Gregg Evans The Public Lands Department is requesting a Budget Amendment to revise the scope of work for existing CIP funded projects. The original scope of work for Lindsey Gardens Concessions had two projects(83-20408,86-194o8)that supported baseball concessions and public access. The department has struggled with estimates that would come in under budget for either project.The first project involved new construction as well as a new location for an aging concession stand and the second,a new path to link parking lot access to the middle field.As cost estimates rose,it was decided to keep the standing location,but remove it to build a new,smaller,and simpler version. Rapidly rising building costs brought this new construction bid in even higher than the original plan,and the second idea had to be rejected. With these concerns,Engineering,Parks,and the Avenues Baseball League decided that a facelift to the existing stand would be sufficient and ask that the scope of work be adjusted for both projects to spend the remaining funds as outlined below: - Concession stand renovation - Pedestrian path to middle field - Batting cage renovation - Covering dugouts with shade canopies - Trail from middle field to lower field The Avenues Baseball League supports the scope change as they are the ones that submitted the application in 2018. They have seen the costs associated with the building and path and asked if we could rescope the project to better use the funds that we have to improve all of the baseball fields at Lindsey Gardens. The following is a note from the league President: This note is to confirm that the Board of Directors of the Avenues Baseball League(ABL)has been informed of and approved the changes to the scope of work at Lindsey Gardens.As president of the league,I have been involved with you,Dat,Preston,and others to change the scope of work and establish new priorities given the anticipated cost overruns after getting the bids for the original scope of work.I have communicated the revised scope of work and the priority of the projects to the ABL board. The board agrees with the priorities that we have discussed and is eager to get on with the project. 2 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Bart Cocke President,Avenues Baseball League According to the cost estimate for the scope of work above there isn't enough funding to do all of the items,but the list is prioritized and Public Lands will work through and make the funding go as far as possible. A-8: Donation for the Cemetery Donation $1,000,000.00 Department:Public Lands Prepared By:Gregg Evans For questions please include:Gregg Evans, Kristin Riker This amendment recognizes a donation to the City for cemetery maintenance. A-9: Bonuses for Police POST Training, Recruitment Misc Grants $4,300,000.00 and Retention GF $1,201,976.00 Department:Police Prepared By: Chief Mike Brown For questions please include: Chief Brown,Shellie Dietrich,Mary Beth Thompson The Salt Lake City Police Department(SLCPD)is committed to recruiting the best and brightest individuals to join its team to help provide a safe and thriving community.Today,law enforcement agencies across the country continue experiencing challenges recruiting and hiring qualified police candidates.To that end,the department is seeking funding to provide a hiring bonus of$1o,000 to lateral officers with a two-year commitment to employment with the department.Additionally,the department is seeking funding to provide a$5,000 bonus to qualified new SLCPD officers who have graduated from a self-sponsored,state-certified Utah Peace Officer Standards and Training(POST)academy. Finally,the department is seeking funding to provide a one-time retention bonus for current sworn members. The funding being requested for the above-mentioned bonuses this fiscal year includes$4.3 million from ARPA funds and$1.2 million from the general fund. A more detailed breakdown is contained in the table below. Total Retention and Hiring Program Cost Total Cost Program Estimate ARPA GF-23 GF- 24 Lateral Hiring $ 367,000 $ 200,000 $ 83,500 $ 83,500 Academy Hiring $ 36,700 $ 36,700 $ - $ - Retention $ 6,142,112 $4,o63,300 $ 1,118,476 $ 96o,336 Total $ 6,545,812 $4,300,000 $ 1,201,976 $ 1,043,836 Further information is contained in the memo from Chief Brown that is attached at the end of the transmittal (Attachment#3) 3 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount A-io: Real Property Purchase GF $825,000.00 CIP $825,000.00 Department:Finance Prepared By:Mary Beth Thompson For questions please include:Mary Beth Thompson Funds are being requested in conjunction with the$3.56 million included as a Council-added item for property acquisition on budget amendment#4. A-m Main Street Pedestrian Mall Conceptual Design GF $100,000.00 Study Department:Economic Development Prepared By:Lorena Rio-Jenson For questions please include:Lorena Riffo-Jenson,Mary Beth Thompson,Lisa Shaffer Salt Lake City's Department of Economic Development is seeking consultant services to develop a conceptual design study that will provide a vision,high level recommendations,and a path toward implementing the Main Street pedestrian mall.The consultant selected will be responsible for managing all aspects of the project outlined in this scope of work,including examining the current street conditions,creating planning and design recommendations(including emergency vehicle access,maintenance,utilities access,accessibility considerations,operations and maintenance needs, landscaping,and drainage,etc.),visualizing concept designs,public outreach,and calculating a cost analysis for each future phase of the project. rSection B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-i: Interest on General Obligation Series 2019A, Series CIP $62,203.69 202o and Series 2021 CIP $222,627.19 CIP $321,497.01 Department:Finance Prepared By:Brandon Bagley For questions please include:Brandon Bagley,Marina Scott,Mary Beth Thompson General Obligation Bond Series 20i9A,was issued in October 2019 to fund reconstruction of City streets.Par value of the issued bonds was$22,840,000.At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee.Since then,unspent bond proceeds have earned interest.This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including interest earned from September 2021 through November 2022. General Obligation Bond Series 2020,was issued in September 2020 to fund reconstruction of City streets.Par value of the issued bonds was$17,745,000.At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee.Since then,unspent bond proceeds have earned interest.This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including interest earned from September 2021 through November 2022. 4 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount General Obligation Bonds Series 2021,was issued in November 2021 to fund reconstruction of City streets.Par value of the issued bonds was$20,600,000.At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then,unspent bond proceeds have earned interest.This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from December 2021 through November 2022. 5 Salt Lake City FY2O22-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount D-2:Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal D-3: 300 West Roadway Bond Adjustments CIP -$2,150,000.00 CIP $2,150,000.00 Department:Public Services Prepared By:Joshua Willie For question please include:Joshua Willie,Jorge Chamorro,Brandon Bagley,Mike Atkinson, Dustin Petersen Public Services Engineering Division is requesting to revise the second tranche of bond funds.The 300 West project-Cost Center 83-21201 is coming in under budget in the amount of$2,150,000.00.To ensure we utilize all of the bond funds before they expire,it is in our best interest to move these funds to Cost Center 83-21203 which is a Bond Contingency Cost Center.This will provide flexibility to use these funds on other approved bond projects within the bond's scope as funding is needed.The potential funding uses includes local street reconstruction candidates as listed below. • 60o S from goo W to Boo W at an initial estimated cost of$746,984 • 80o W from ARAPAHOE AV to 600 S at an initial estimated cost of$191,476 • 800 W from ARAPAHOE AV to 700 S at an initial estimated cost of$218,io9 • goo S from 1100 E to 1200 E at an initial estimated cost of$501,825 • BRYAN AVE from 800 E to goo E at an initial estimated cost of$310,153 • INDUSTRIAL RD from 2100 S to ASSOCIATED AV at an initial estimated cost of$401,643 • JEFFERSON ST from TERMINUS END to 1400 S at an initial estimated cost of$80,300 • KENSINGTON AVE from 800 E to goo E at an initial estimated cost of$308,933 • LIBERTY AVE from LAKE ST to 800 E at an initial estimated cost of$81,454 • ROOSEVELT AVE from 600 E to 700 E at an initial estimated cost of$239,128 6 Salt Lake City FY2O22-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount D-4: Insurance Funds for City and County Building CIP $7,252,300.00 Department:Public Services Prepared By:Dustin Petersen For questions please include:Jorge Chamorro,Jim Cleland,City Engineer,Mary Beth Thompson, Dustin Petersen Public Services'Engineering division has been working with the City's Insurance carrier(FM Global)to receive funding for earthquake damages to the City and County building.The amount has been agreed to and is currently being processed. This amendment allows for the revenue to be recorded and the corresponding expense budget of$7,252,300. D-5: IMS Budget for New GF Positions IMS $207,000.00 Department:IMS Prepared By:Randy Hillier For questions please include:Joseph Anthony,Aaron Bentley, Randy Hillier,John Vuyk Budget was approved for a$207,000 general fund transfer to IMS for the cost of hardware for newly funded general fund positions,but the budget for the revenue coming in from the general fund and the expenditure on the hardware was inadvertently left out of the IMS budget. This amendment will rectify that mistake. D-6: Real Property Purchase—CIP Budget Associated CIP $3,567,564.00 with BA#4 Council-Added Initiative Department:Finance Prepared By:Randy Hillier For questions please include:Randy Hillier,John Vuyk In budget amendment#4 the Council added a general fund budget of$3,567,564 for a real property purchase. Typically, real property purchases are budgeted in a CIP cost center in order for the asset to be capitalized. This amendment will add the necessary CIP budget for the purchase. D-7:Move Cost of Issuance Costs from CIP to Debt CIP -$194,957.90 Service Fund Class Debt Service $194,957.90 CIP -$140,000.00 Debt Service $140,000.00 Department:Finance Prepared By:Brandon Bagley For questions please include: Brandon Bagley,Nancy Sanders,Mike Atkinson Per GASB 65,the cost of issuance for bonds is a non-capital expense.The cost of issuance budgets for General Obligation Bonds,Series 2022,and Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds,Series 2022 C Federally Taxable were recorded in Fund Class 83 CIP.Fund Class 83 CIP is reserved for capital expense.The proper accounting treatment for cost of issuance expense budgets is to record them in Fund Class 81 Debt Service.This budget amendment proposes to move the approved cost of issuance non-capital budgets from Fund Class 83 CIP to Fund Class 81 Debt Service. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1:Treasury ERAP 2 Additional Resources Misc Grants $4,000,000.00 Department:CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions please include:Tony Milner,Brent Beck,Ann Garcia This budget amendment is to recognize the City's additional allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act,Treasury Emergency Rent Assistance Program 2(ERAP 2)funds,in the amount of$4,000,000,for the purpose of assisting in the stabilization and recovery of COVID-affected,low-income residential renters in Salt Lake City. 7 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount This budget amendment is separate from previous Council-approved City ERAP allocations: ERAP 1 Initial Award ($6,o67,033),ERAP 1 Additional Allocation($3,000,000),ERAP i Additional Allocation($5,000,000),and ERAP 2 Initial Award($4,800,559.40)• To administer this additional ERAP 2 allocation the City will contract with the State of Utah,Department of Workforce Services'(DWS)online Utah Rent Relief application portal,https://rentrelief.utah.gov/.The City has previously and successfully contracted with DWS for the City's ERAP 1 and 2 funds. This budget amendment aligns with Treasury guidance on eligible activities and allowable percentage amounts for ERAP 2. Direct Client Assistance: Deposits,rent,utilities,rent arrears,and utility arrears. Housing Stability Services:Treasury guidance for eligible Housing Stability services include:Case management,Eviction prevention,Eviction diversion programs,Mediation between landlords and tenants,Housing counseling,Fair housing counseling,Housing navigators or promotoras that help households access ERA programs or find housing,Housing- related services for survivors of domestic abuse or human trafficking,Legal services or attorney's fees related to eviction proceedings and maintaining housing stability,Specialized services for individuals with disabilities or seniors that support their ability to access or maintain housing. A public competitive process would receive applications from providers for eligible Housing Stability services. All ERAP 2 funds must be obligated by September 30,2025. Section F: Donations Consent Agenda#5 Section G: Consent Agenda G-i: Know Your Neighbor Grant Program,Open Misc Grants $61,000.00 Society Foundation-Salt Lake County Department:Mayor's Office Prepared By: Kaletta Lynch/Ann Garcia The Mayor's Office of Equity&Inclusion received$61,000 in grant funding from Salt Lake County as a pass through from the County's application to the Operation Afghan Resettlement Support(OARS)program.The County was awarded $150,000 and is requesting to partner with Salt Lake City's Know Your Neighbor Program to assist the County in assimilating and welcoming the Afghan Refugees. The funding will be used to hire a new part-time program coordinator and not more than$1,000 for the program coordinator to travel for program related purposes. No match is required. A public hearing was held for this grant application on io/18/2022. 8 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount G-2: Utah State Office of Education,Child and Adult Misc Grants $46,000.00 Care Food Program-Youth After School Programs Department:CAN Prepared By:Kim Thomas/Ann Garcia The Youth&Family Division of Public Services applied for and received a continuation grant offered annually by the Utah State Office of Education,under the Child and Adult Care Food Program. These funds are available to youth service providers as part of the At-Risk Snack Program to reimburse for the costs of snacks served to children participating in the after-school programs. Central City Rec.Center,Fairmont Park,Glendale Library,Liberty Park,Northwest Rec.Center, Ottinger Hall,the Youth and Family Division Office,and Sorenson Campus will receive reimbursement directly through the State Office of Education and will receive up to$46,000,based on qualified snack expenses. SLC is reimbursed on a monthly basis and only qualified healthy snacks and meals served to children participating in the after-school enrichment/education activities during the afterschool program hours are eligible for reimbursement. A public hearing was held for the grant application on 10/4/2022. Consent Agenda#6 G-i: U S Department of Justice,Community Oriented Misc Grants $24,170.00 Policing Services(COPS), FY22 Community Police Development(CPD)Grant Department:Police Department Prepared By: Jordan Smith/Ann Garcia The police department applied for and received a$24,170 grant from the U.S.Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services through the FY22 Community Policing Development Grant. The grant will fund an evaluation for the Promising Youth Project.The project will fund training and curriculum recommended by the evaluation contractor. The Police Department will develop an evaluation that will provide four major services: Evaluation of Program Fidelity,Evaluation of Program Outcomes,Training and Technical Assistance,and development of a Final Report. A Public Hearing was held on 07/19/2022 for the grant application on this award. - Section I: Council Added Items 9 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Attachments Attachment#1 MKA Ni- Ob'ectCode Prima Second.Vendor Transaction Postin Inv. PmjeR ARivity ry Vendor Name Set ID Check# 9 Debrt Substantiate Supported Location Vendor Inv.No. Description Description Ref. ry Ref. ID Descripdan Date Date _ dTotal Total BIT 0tner Professional&T.N/A..N/A 10/07/20 CP2126 0 RACONCONSULTA 09/30/20 $ $ Soli Lake Ciry&T rmcon 04/20/20 En damage assessment. OCM1er Pmfession.l&Ti N/A..N/A 10/21/2010 9688 FO o11628 10/21/20 $160.00 $160.00 Arts Council???SLCArts Coucll SlrterClty 1/OS/205ieff Hours to pack up Sister City collectior Omer E.pemes N/A..N/ /281211E 6:N/A..N/A SALT cL - 11111/21 Dr PPEENN PREO NG&cONSTRU MOBERNROOFIN(CP08192021H 08/19/20 $126a.00 $12, It Lake Ciry&Modern Conrtn 20-338 09/07/20 Temp.egress. E N/A.N/A 09/09/20 38 08/31/20 $15,080.00 $15,080.00 Salt Lake Ciry&GSBSArchltects 04/30/20 ED damage assessment. EN/A..N/A 09/09/20 38 08/31/20 $13,554AM $13,554.00 Salt Lake Ciry&GSBS Architects 05/31/20 Exterior st.it design. EN/A..N/A 09/B9/20 38 11131121 $2810.00 $],EG.R. Salt Lake Ciry&GSBS ArcM1Rec[s 05/31/20 Selective demolRion. EN/A..N/A 09/B9/20 38 08/31/20 $14,231.70 $14,231.70 Salt Lake Ciry&GSBS AP,hR is 06/30/20 Exterior st.it design. EN/A..N/A 09/B9/20 38 08/31/20 $3,148.D0 $3,148.00 Salt La ke Ciry&GSBS AP,hR is 06/30/20 Selective demolRion. EN/A..N/A 09/B9/20 38 08/31/20 $4,066.20 $4,066.20 Salt La ke Ciry&GSBS AP,hR- 07/31/20 Exterior st.it design. _ EN/A..N/A 09/B9/20 38 3A _ 08/31/20 $3,148.D $3,149.00 Salt La ke Ciry&GSBS Arcnitects 3 07/31/20 Selective demolRion. _ EN/A..N/A O'/13/2'1 CP2127 ONI 12/31/20 $39, $39, Salt Lake Ciry&Sbllings C-R 112/16/20 S.I-Ii-demolRion. _ EN/A..N/A 0'/2./2'F0 F S/20/21 $2,168.00 $2JISBCD p Bldg ,4 E-w.Care,lm 06/17/20 OR-eecontamination Ma erials&Supplu _ EN/A..N/A 02/10/2138 OS/31/21 $1,5]a.00 $1,524.CD Salt C.ke Ciry&GSBSArcnitects O3/31/215elective d..."onzurvey PREO ING-ONSTRU MODERN ROOIN(CPOa1421 04/14/21 $31,192.00 $31,192.00 9PIaza Parks Modern Conrtn 20- 02/12/21 ED damage repairs. E WA..N/A 0]/2/2100 06/30/21 $281" $2,850.00 Salt Lake CRy&MOCA Systems 06/09/21 Project management. PRED NG&LONSTRU MODERN ROORN(CP0]21 06/30/21 $e,]06.BE $8,706.80 9PIaza PaIM Modern Conrtn 20. 06/11/21 ED damage repairs. PR ED O NG&CONSTRU MODERN ROOFIN(CP072021 018 06/30/21 $3,983.20 $3,883.20 9PIaza Parks Modern Comtr120- 06/11/21,ED damage repairs. ni a su 20ERTHOUAK :_N//q=N/A M DE a]: Dl/D1/21 $9.a4 AL&su20ERTHnuAK 2N/A..rv/A of/o1/u 5313.45 OTHER AL&SU 20ERTHOUAK S:N/A..N/A 01/01/21 $332.24 OTHER MATERAL&su20ERTHnuAK s:N/A..N/A of/o1/u 576.26 AL&SU20ERTHDUAK OS/01/21 535.50 $15.50 FacilRies-2299 GRAINGER 03/24/225teel comerbraces. OTHER ATERAL&SU 20ERTHDUAK NG&CON5TRU 2004311262 00]061 OS/BS/21 $1,3 $1,3 Salt Lake CRy&Madero Conzt 20 04/06/205eal damaged planer. AL&Su20ERTHOUAK 6':N/AZN/A M Dl/o1/21 152s.00 OTHER MATERAL&SU 20ERTHOUAK 6'.N/A..N/ATP 11111/21 $9as..OTHER 1 OTHER MATER AL&SU 20ERTHOVAK 6':N/A..NI 01/01/21 $945.00 OTHER AL&SU 20ERTHOUAK BN/A..N/A O1/O1/21 $5.2. AL&SU 20ERTHOUAK BN/A..N/A 01/01/21 $8.59 OTHER OTHER NATERAL&SU20ERTHDUAK IXN/A..N/A OS/0121 511.30 $11.30 FacilRies-2299 Co mmerci.I HE 1010632-C 03/25/20 Bi-pin Quartz Socket&SBW FL36 Halogen AL&SU20ERTHDU Al 11519 NA-N/A OS/01/21 STEEL 00 $1720.00 Public Service Br OTIS 03/25/20OTEER"ATE Elevatorre OTHER AL&SU20ERTHDUAK N/A..N/A 013151 OS/01/21 $81.00 $81.00 FacilRies-2299 Commercial Lig1010496oCO3/24/20 Acrylic Lem Omer Pmf ssRonal&Ti 20ERTHOVAK SkN/A..N/A 01/01/21 $356.]3 Other Professional&Ti 20ERTHWAK EST N/A..N/A 01/01/21 1650.]9 Omer Profession.I&T.20ERTHQUAK 0 BN/A..N/A 11111/21 11,s]].91 Omer Professional&T.20ERTHQUAK 0 DN/A..N/A 01/01/21 54,330.06 Other Pmfesslnn.I&nN/A..N/A as/12/z120TR � 05/12/21 $1193.11 51,s93.ss _ - 03/08/2 ArcNtecmal services. Other Pmfessi-I&T.N/A..N/A 05/12/2120 05/12/21 $1,63908 $1,639CA - 05/04/21 Architectural services. BG&HOUSINGREP420ERTHOUAK O _ 01/01/21 $508 $508. SaltzLake Ciry&[Kone El-1.,, 1. + 04/16/20 Elevatorre BG&HOUSI NG REP;20ERTHOUAK 9N/A.N/AK 6 OS/01121 $625 $625. Salt L.ke Ciry&Kone Elevator 1. + 04/28/21 Elev.t. HH: H- R Omer Expenses PREO TERSTATE BARRICA 01/01/21 $110 a0 $110.OD Building In ate barn: OS/31/205idewalk barn!ades due to En damage tal Omer Expenses PREn 9N/A..N/A N OS/01/21 $3,837.51 13,8 S.ItnL.ke City&Modem Conrtn2I AS'11903/20/20 Remove loose plant Omer Expenses PREn 9 N/A..N/A 01/01/21 $275.DO $225.00 Multiple,SLC&Modern Comtr�20-D4-310 04/3z/20 Seal damaged planer. Omer Expenses PREn 9N/A..N/A OS/01121 SISTER $11.R. Salt La ke Ciry&Modern ComR-D4-31404/16/20 Repona1o.hersM1ock. PRn xG&coxsTR M 09/1620 $2g562ao $20,562R. Ischer-Inn Modem C-R,20-344 09/03/20 En damage repairs. EN/A..N/A OS/BI 3a 1804 05/04/21 $7,460AM $7,460.00 SLC Parking kpff 325,796.05/20/20 Engineering serricez. nn LI-I.N.C-N/A..N/A 09/BB/21 20 _ 09/08/21 $688.10 nn Iubllc Notices N/A..N/A "'BE/2'2 PR LI $381 $381. Salt Lake DID&The Salt Lake IT 2021cl CR 06/27/21 NET-W bidders. _ RTHOUAK 02/31/21 $2,0 $2,0 Salt Lake Ciry&GSBS Architect= 04/30/21 Exenor _ RTHOUAK 07/31/21 $2,259.DO $2,259.00 Salt La ke Ciry&GSBS Arch,-, 39352 05/31/21 E.-I. pa RTHOUAK CHI 07/31/21 $1,807.2. EN/A..N/A 09/BB/21 N 08/31/21 $1,985.00 $1,985.00 Salt La ke Ciry&MOCA Syrtems 07/19/21 Project management. EN/A..N/A 09/BB/21 IN 08/31/21 $1,350.no $1,350.00 Salt La ke Ciry&MOCA Systems OB/20/21 Project management. /AEEEECC O'/29/2'20. NG&CONSTRU MODERN ROOFIN(CP0 1 09/29/21 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 Salt Lake Ciry&Modern Conrtn 2043100 07/12/21 5te11 repairs. RTHOUAK 11/23/21 $CW $1,8 Salt Lake Ciry&GSBS Architect= 07/31/21 Exenor 0. MMMB YYYC SSS CCC _N THOUAK 11/23/21 $1,807.20 $1,8 Salt La ke Ciry&GSBS Architect= O9/31/21 Exenor THOUAK RCHI _ 11/23/21 $1,80].20 $1,8 Salt Lake Ciry&GSBS Architect= 10/31/21 Exenor EN/AR.N/A 12/01/21 3N- 11/30/21 $2150.00 $2250.00 Salt Lake Ciry&MOCA Systems 09/08/21 Project menageme'nt. E N/A..N/A 12/01/21 IN- 11/31121 $1,900.Do $11900.00 Salt La ke Ciry&MOCA Syrtems 10/13/21 Project management. EN/A..N/A 12/01/21 IN- u/30/21 $C150.00 $1,150.00 Salt Lake Ciry&MOCA Systems ss/1z/21 Project management. THOUAK - NO&CONSTRU MoeERNRODUNt cP120721 11131/21 $166p00.00 RTHnUAK Ses PC DBA G S B S ARCHI 023541 12/31/21 $903.60 DN/AZN/A G - Dl/o1/2z $1p29.13 01/31/22 1 1.130.00 CAP TALE END TO REIAC2" 6D1/31/22 13:73.57 RTHOUAK - NG&GONSTRU Mo.ERN ROOINt CPo3os2z D2/28/2 2 $A,200.00 RTHOUAK 13131/22 117 1.11 RTHnuAK D3/3o/2 2 51,0z5.00 CAP EN DITURE RTHQUAK as ARCI o331/22 1361 � 1/ 0. RTHnuAK o D3zz $9500 SARCHITECGBSPC11ACA CP141322A o331/22 151,55'6o 59eo903/31/22 61 BID ESPCEIR CPH BER I A CAP AT EXPENDITURE TH-I 100 - NG&CAN oxSTRUMoeERNRooINt cP11122A s 34/30/22 _.I3 33 DBAG06/30/22 $8,9 $8,9 (Salt Lake Ciry&GSBS ArcM1itec[s 03/31/22 Seisms 2237 SB6PC DBAGSBSARLHI 029098 06/30/22 $16, $16, Soli Lake Ciry&GSBS Arcnitects 04/30/22 Seisms 2N/A.N/AG mPdedBLabII01E09922MW 50 06/30/22 $30, $30, Salt L.ke Ciry&GSBSArchiteces 05/31/22 Seisms ppp- N/A..N/A corded Llabllit1E091922MW 06/3022 $22 $2I, Salt Leke Ciry&GSBS Architect= 06/30/225e OACM1erPmEfessioDnal&Ti N/AZN/A1'AF 120 10/31/21 $163.9D1 uesaion o. -.07/02/21 Conrt'cDocs S. OCM1erPmfessional&Ti N/A..N/A120 -. _ 10/31/21 $18.2 $18.21 uesaion o._ - 09/15/21 Corot Docs Omer Pmfezzional&Ti N/A..INA20 12/31,21 . . -'12/06/21 Bidd'mg/PermittingOmer Pmfezzional&Ti N/A..NA, 220 -i 1909 OS/31/22 $302. $1C2.44 oesaion 0 -DO3/SO/22 Bidd'mg/Permitting DD HI EXn PublcNotices FAC20045 - HE 03005] 06/3022 $549.50 $549.1D rThe Salt LakeRIT 2021ci19`.06/13/22 Notice to bidders. N/A..N/A�114n1 1N/a7H/A�L 7HEJ o9o92021A D8/25/21 i $91.4 7 9 ■ � EN/A..N/ /2921 39 09/29/21 $3,780.00 $3,780.00 Bnne sndmp WcGSBS A,chltecce 09/31/2 -Httrt:Enme.. CAP TALEXPENRD RTHOUAK 3. _ 11/1721 $3,024.BE 13,024.Ed ne snnm Amhltecte D9/30/21 Ammttrt:Ervice: EN/A..rv/A 03/11/22 ss _ oz/2a2z Sn,zz6.00 Sl],zz6Do salt is adao.cnnnr 15 09/29/2 En repairs. RTHnuAK 03/3022 S716.00 $756.OD one snnm Amnlcecce o Bz/za/zz Amnirectsem.m EN/A-N/A j Oa/13/22 660 GAN&ASSOCI GANP&ASSOCIP CPOa1322A 600 03/31/22 or mr o.04/07/22 Provided intiallY.paid wanin SMCC proles[ RTHOUAK S B S PCDBAGsasARCHI 02716 05/2522 $8,ws.ao Se,-CD Bnenshnmp WaG5B5 ArchRectssM 4062104/30/22Amnit--ice.. ERX&ARCITITC,1AC20044 IN/A_N/A G ez. 07/3122 $3a2294 ECCCNAAAPPPGIIIITTTNAAAELLLER_&ARC H ITCU 1AC2DD44 1:N/A..N/A ez _ 09/3022 $4,tD- RTHOUAK CA YST _ 08/24/22 $1,685.no $1,685.OD Salt Lake Ciry&MOCA Systems OS/U22 Project management. XX _ RTHOUAK OB/24/22 $Sp60.00 $1,060.OD Salt Lake Ciry&MOCA Systems 06/07/22 Project management. _ N RUTMUAC O8/24/22 $260 $2,6 It &M ms 07/12/22 P- N RTHCUAK _ 08/24/22 $2,90 $2,9 Salt La ke Ciry&M OB/04/22 Pr - 08/3122 $8,8 $A Salt La ke Ciry&GSBS Archle-4098DBR]09/16/22 Seisms 10/3122 $8,3 $8,3 . Salt Lake Ciry&GSBS Architect= 09/31/22 Seisms S CHI 032602 10/31/22 $1y32.00 $1,932R. Salt La ke Ciry&GSBS Archltecc 4130209/30/22 Seismic repairs. LERX&ARCHITCl FAL20045 {N/A.N/A es 07/31/22 $1,A 4.51 ER&ARCHITn FAczooas zzo11:N/A..N/A�AR es 09/30/22 $31e1.55 ' nn -Public Notices FAC20045 � 4109] CP39109204628NARLHCTHITEC65B5 PC DKE BA CAF CP092822 50031549 08/03/22 $535.00 $535.009 The Salt Lake Ti2021c1-59`.06/13/22 Noticembidders-rebid. CAPITAL EXPENDITU RE 20ERTHOUAKFAR 09/28/22 $28 $2,8 M1-I Wa GSBS Architect= 41 Ba/3U22 Architect services. $957,312.94 $429,331.35 10 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Attachment #2 T-: M:]TOROLA S.?LVTfOlV9 Quote Number: QUOTE-1957361 Quote Name:Salt Lake City-Public Safety Radio Billing Address: Equipment Quote Created By: SALT LAKE CITY CORP Quote Date:2022-11-17 Walter Whately 4515 STATE ST RM 235 Expiration Date:2022-12-09 Area Sales Manager Contract Name:18015-STATE OF UTAH 800 MHZ AR- SALT LAKE CITY UT,84111 3841 walter.whately@motorolasolutions.com (520)457-8604 Customer:SALT LAKE CITY CORP Currency:USD Line#]item Number Description • r Discount Fire Mobiles(Utah Bundle Package,$900 APX-6500/Enh Series Trade-In Included) 1 M25URS9PWIBN APX6500 ENHANCED 7/800 MHZ MOBILE. 122 $3,253.00 $396,866.00 74.67% $2,428.91 $824.09 $100,538.98 1a G832AD ADD:SPKR 7.SW WTR FIST APEX. 122 $67.00 $8,174.00 27.00% $18.09 $48.91 $5,967.02 11b GA00580AA ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 122 $495.00 $60,390.00 47.00% $232.65 $262.35 $32,006.70 1c G51AU ENH:SMARTZONE OPERATION APX6500. 122 $1,320.00 $161,040.00 47.00% $620.40 $699.60 $85,351.20 1d G67DT ADD:REMOTE MOUNT ES APXM. 122 $327.00 $39,894.00 47.00% $153.69 $173.31 $21,143.82 1e G78AT ENH:3 YEAR ESSENTIAL SVC. 122 $176.001 $21,472.00 0.00% $0.0 $176.00 $21,472.00 1f GA01606AA ADD:NO GPS/WI-FI ANTENNA NEEDED. 122 $0.00 $0.0c 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1g G444AH ADD:APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE. 122 $0.00 $0.0c 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1h G335AW ADD:ANT 1/4 WAVE 762-870MHZ. 122 $15.00 $1,830.0c 47.00% $7.05 $7.9 $969.90 11 G806BL ENH:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OP APX. 122 $567.00 $69,174.00 47.00% $266.49 $300.51 $36,662.22 1i GA01670AA ADD:APX E5 CONTROL HEAD. 122 $717.00 $87,474.00 47.00% $336.99 $380.01 $46,361.22 1k W22BA ADD:STD PALM MICROPHONE APX. 122 $79.00 $9,638. 47.00% $37.13 $41.87 $5,108.14 11 Q629AK ENH:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 122 $523.00 $63,806.DC 43.00% $224.89 $298.11 $36,369.42 1m G361AH ENH:P25 TRUNKING SOFTWARE APX. 122 $330.00 W,260.00 47.00% $155.10 $174.90 $21,337.80 Fire Mobiles for FSA(Utah Bundle APXT"6500/Enh Series Package,$900 Trade-In Included) 2 M25URS9PWIBN APX6500 ENHANCED 7/800 MHZ MOBILE. 15 $3,253.00 $49,795.00 74.67% $2,428.91 $824.09 $12,361.35 2a G832AD ADD:SPKR 7.5W WTR RST APEX. 15 $67.00 $1,005.0c 27.00% $18.09 $48.91 $733.65 21b G66BF ADD:DASH MOUNT 02 APXM. 15 $138.00 $2,070.02 27.00% $37.26 $100.74 $1,511.10 2c GA00580AA ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 15 $495.00 $7,425.00 47.00% $232.65 $262.35 $3,935.25 2d G51AU ENH:SMARTZONE OPERATION APX6500. 15 $1,320.00 $19,800.0c 47.00% $620.40 $699.6 $10,494.00 2e G78AT EN H:3 YEAR ESSENTIAL SVC. 15 $176.00 $2,640.0C 0.00% $0.0 $176.00 $2,640.00 2f GA01606AA ADD:NO GPS/WI-FI ANTENNA NEEDED. 15 $0.00 $0.0c 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2g GA00804AA ADD:APX 02 CH(GREY). 15 $541.00 $8,115.DC 27.00% $146.07 $394.93 $5,923.95 2h G444AH ADD:APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE. 15 $0.00 $0.0c 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2i G335AW ADD:ANT 1/4 WAVE 762-870MHZ. 15 $15.00 $225. 47.00% $7.05 $7.9 $119.25 2j G806BL ENH:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OF APX. 15 $567.00 $8,505.0C 47.00% $266.49 $300.51 $4,507.65 2k I W22BA ADD:STD PALM MICROPHONE APX. 15 $79.00 $1,185.cq 47.00% $37.13 $41.87 $628.05 11 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 21 G843AH ADD:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 15 $523.00 $7,845.00 47.00% $245.8 $277AS $4,157.5 2m G361AH ENH:P25 TRUNKING SOFTWARE APX. 15 $330.00 $4,950.00 47.00% $155.1 $174.9C $2,623.5 Fire Portables with AES Encryption(Utah APX'"6000 Series Bundle Package,$700 Trade-In Included) 3 H98UCD9PW5BN APX60007/800 MHZ MODEL 1.5 13 $3,213.00 $41,769.00 64.79% $2,081.5 $1,131.41 $14,708.3 3a QA05570AA ALT:U-ION IMPRES 2 IP683400 MAH. 13 $110.00 $1,430.00 27.00% $29.7C $80.3C $1,043.9 3b Q361AR ADD:P259600 BAUD TRUNKING. 13 $330.00 $4,290.00 43.00% $141.9 $188.1c $2,445.3 3c H38BT ADD:SMARTZONE OPERATION. 13 $1,320.00 $17,160.00 43.00% $567.6 $752.4C $9,781.2 3d Q58AL ADD:3Y ESSENTIAL SERVICE. 13 $121.0 $1,573.00 0.00% $0.0 $121.0 $1,573. 3e QA00580AC ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 13 $495.00 $6,435.00 43.00% $212.8 $282.1 $3,667.9 3f QA0176SAA ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 13 $83.00 $1,079.00 27.00% $22.41 $60.5 $787.6 3g Q806BM ADD:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OPERATION. 13 $567.00 $7,371.00 43.00% $243.83 $323.1 $4,201.4 3h Q629AK ENH:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 13 $523.00 $6,799.00 43.00% $224.8S $298.1 $3,875.4 4 NNTN8863A CHARGER,SINGLE-UNIT,IMPRES 2,3A,100 13 $169.56 $2,204.2E 26.81% $45.46 $124.1 $1,613.3 Standalone Items 5 PMNN4486A BATT IMPRES 2 LIION R IP67 3400T. 13 $179.30 $2,330.9C 27.00% $48.41 $130.5 $1,701.5 6 PMMN4099CL AUDIO ACCESSORY-REMOTE SPEAKER 13 $142.56 $1,853.2E 27.00% $38.4 $104.0 $1,352.9 Fire Portables Non-XE(Utah Bundle APXTm 6000 Series Package,$700 Trade-In Included) 7 H98UCD9PW5BN APX60007/800 MHZ MODEL 1.5 131 $3,213.0 $420,903.00 64.79% $2,081.5 $1,131.4 $148,214.7 7a G843AH ADD:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 131 $523.00 $68,513.00 47.00% $245.8 $277.1 $36,311.8 7b QA05570AA ALT:U-ION IMPRES 2 IP683400 MAH. 131 $110.0c $14,410.00 27.00% $29.7 $80.3 $10,519.3 7c Q361AR ADD:P259600 BAUD TRUNKING. 131 $330.00 $43,230.00 43.00% $141.9 $188.1 $24,641.1 7d H38BT ADD:SMARTZONE OPERATION. 131 $1,320.0 $172,920.0 43.00% $567.6 $752.4 $98,564. 7e Q58AL ADD:3Y ESSENTIAL SERVICE. 131 $121.DC $15,551. 0.00% $0.0 $121.0 $15,851. 7f QA00580AC ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 131 $495.CK $64,545. 43.00% $212.85 $282.1 $36,961.6 7g QA01768AA ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 131 $83.0 $10,873. 27.00% $22.41 $60.5 $7,937.2 7h Q806BM ADD:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OPERATION. 131 $567.00 $74,277. 43.00% $243.81 $323.1 $42,337.8 8 NNTN8863A CHARGER,SINGLE-UNIT,IMPRES 2,3A,100 131 $169.56 $22,212.3 26.81% $45.46 $124.1 $16,257.1 Standalone Items 9 PMNN4486A BATT IMPRES 2 LIION R IP67 3400T. 131 $179.30 $23,488.3 27.00% $48.41 $130.8 $17,146.5 10 PMMN4099CL AUDIO ACCESSORY-REMOTE SPEAKER 131 $142.56 $18,675.3E 27.00% $38.49 $104.0 $13,633.1 Fire Portables XE for Wild Fire Ops.(Utah APXT"6000 Series Bundle Package,$700 Trade-In Included) 11 H98UCD9PWSBN APX60007/800 MHZ MODEL 1.5 36 $3,213.0 $115,668.00 62.79% $2,017.32 $1,195.6 $43,044.1 Ila G843AH ADD:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 36 $5210C $18,828.00 47.00% $245.81 $277.1 $9,978.8 llb Q361AR ADD:P259600 BAUDTRUNKING. 36 $330.0C $11,880. 41.00 $1353C $194.7C $7,009.2 llc QA02006AA ENH:APX6000XE RUGGED RADIO. 36 $880.0c $31,680. 41.00% $360.8C $519.2C $18,691.2 lld Q58AL ADD:3Y ESSENTIAL SERVICE. 36 $121.00 $4,356.0 0.00% $0.0 $121.0 $4,356. Ile QA00580AC ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 36 $495.0C $17,820. 41.00% $202.95 $292.0 $10,513. llf QA01768AA ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 36 $83.00 $2,988.0 27.00% $22.41 $60.5 $2,181.2 llg H38BT ADD:SMARTZONE OPERATION. 36 $1,320.Oq $47,520. 41.00% $541.2C $778.8 $28,036. 11h QA01427AB ALT:IMPACT GREEN HOUSING. 36 $28.00 $1,008.0 27.00% $7.56 $20. $735.5 Ili Q806BM ADD:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OPERATION. 36 $567.00 $20,412. 41.00% $232.4 $334.5 $12,043.OE r12PMNN4547A BATT IMPRES 2 UION TIA4950 R IP68 36 $203. $7,308.0 27.00° $54.81 $148.1 $5,334.8NNTN8863A CHARGER,SINGLE-UNIT,IMPRES 2,3A,100 36 $169.5 $6,104.1 26.81° $45.4 $124.1 $4,467.6tandalone ItemsIPMMN4107C AUDIO ACCESSORY-REMOTE SPEAKER 36 $594.00 $21,384.Oq 27.00% $160.3 $433.6 $15,610.3 12 Salt Lake City FY21022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount FLASHport Series Flashes for Fire 15 T8010A ANALOG 3600 TRUN KING. 1 $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.05 $0.0c $0.0 15a GA00894AB ENH:ANALOG 3600 TRUNKI NG TO 9600 1 $721.00 $721.00 27.00% $194.6 $526.3 $526.3 15b UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.0c $0.0 15c GA00580AC ENH:UPGRADE TO TDMA. 1 $569.00 $569.00 27.00% $153.62 $415.3 $415.3 FLASHport Series Flashes for Fire 16 T7905A ANALOG 3600 TRUN KING. 1 $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0. $0.0 16a QA03216AB ENH:ANALOG 3600 TRUNKI NG TO 9600 1 $721.00 $721.0 27.00% $194.6 $526.31. $526.3 16b UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.00 $0.0c 0.00% $0.00 $0.0c $0.0 16c QA00580AE ENH:TDMA OPERATION. 1 $569.00 $569.0 27.00% $153.62 $415.3 $415.3 FLASHport Series Flashes for Fire 17 T7697A DIGITAL SMARTZONE. 1 $0.00 $0.0 0.00% $0.00 $0.02 $0.0 17a UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.00 $0.0c 0.00% $0.00 $0.0c $0.0 17b GA00580AC ENH:UPGRADE TO TDMA. 4 $569.00 $2,276.0 27.00% $153.63 $415.3 $1,661. FLASHport Series Flashes for Fire 18 T7664A DIGITAL SMARTZONE. 1 $0.00 $0.0 0.00% $0.00 $0.0 $0.0 18a QA0176BAD ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 13 $95.00 $1,235.0 27.00% $25.65 $69.3 $901.5 18b UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.00 $0.0 0.00% $0.00 $0.0 $0.0 18c QA00580AE ENH:TDMA OPERATION. 13 $569.00 $7,397.0 27.00% $153.62 $415.3 $5,399.5 FLASHport Series Flashes for Fire 19 T7664A DIGITAL SMARTZONE. 1 $0.00 $0.0 0.00% $0.00 $0.01 $0.0 19a QA01768AD ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 20 $95.00 $1,900.0 27.00% $25.65 $69.3 $1,387. 19b UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.0 $0.0 0.00% $0.00 $0.0 $0.0 19c QA00580AE ENH:TDMA OPERATION. 20 $569.00 $11,380.0 27.00% $153.63 $415.3 $8,307. FLASHport Series Flashes for Fire 20 T7664A DIGITAL SMARTZONE. 1 $0.0 $0.0c 0.00% $0.00 $0. $0.0 20a QA0176SAD ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 8 $95.0 $760.0 27.00% $25.65 $69.3 $554.8 20b QA00580AE ENH:TDMA OPERATION. 8 $569.00 $4,552.0 27.00% $153.62 $415.3 $3,322.9 FLASHport Series Flashes for Fire 21 T7664A DIGITAL SMARTZONE. 1 $0. $0.0c 0.00% $0.0 $0. $0.0 21a QA0176BAD ENH:ENHANCED ZONE BANK. 10 $95.0 $950.0 27.00% $25.65 $69.3 $693.5 21b UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.0C $0.0 0.009/ $0.0 $0.0C $0.0 21c QA00580AE ENH:TDMA OPERATION. 10 $569.0C $5,690.0 27.00% $153.6 $415.3 $4,153.7 FLASHport Series Flashes for Fire 22 T8012A 9600 OR 3600 SINGLE SYSTEM DIGITAL 1 $0.0c $0.0 0.00% $0.0 $0. $0.0 22a UA00083AA ADD:SOFTWARE LICENSE ONLINE 1 $0.0c $0.0 0.00% $0.0 $0. $0.0 22b GA00580AC ENH:UPGRADE TO TDMA. 8 $569.00 $4,552.0 27.00% $153.6 $415.3 $3,322.9 KVL 5000 Encryption Keyloader for Police 23 T8476B KVL 5000. 1 $6,000.0 $6,000.0 27.00% $1,620.0 $4,380.0 $4,380. 23a CA00182AW ADD:AES ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE. 1 $0.0C $0.0 0.00% $0.00 $0.01 $0.0 23b CA03467AA ADD:NORTH AMERICA MICRO USB 1 $0.0c $0.0 0.00% $0.00 $0.0 $0.0 23c CA0335SAA ADD:ASTRO 25 MODE. 1 $0.00 $0.0 0.00% $0.00 $0.0 $0.0 24 HKN6182B CABLE KEYLOADING ADAPTER CGAI. 2 $196.00 $392.0 20.00% $39.20 $156.8 $313.6 25 WPLN6904A ASSY:KIT,KEYLOAD CABLE. 2 $118.80 $237.6 27.00% $32.08 $86.7 $173.4 26 PMNN4549A BATT IMPRES 2 LIION 2925T. 2 $80.00 $160.0 27.00% $21.60 $58. $116.8 27 TKN8531C j CABLE,KEYLOAD. 2 $311.44 $622.8 20.00% $62.2 $249.1 $498.3 After Market Encryption Upgrades AES for Police 28 T7936A APX UCM UPGRADE CD. I 1 $57.50 $57.5 926.99% $15.521 $41.9 $41.9 28a CA00182AR ADD:AES ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE. 1100 $696.00 $69,600.Cq 27.0MId $187.94 $508.0 $50,808.01 13 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount After Market Encryption Upgrades AES for Police 29 T7936A APX UCM UPGRADE CD. 1 $57.50 $57.50 26.99% $15.52 $41.9 $41.9 29a CA00182AR ADD:AES ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE. 100 $696.00 $69,600.00 27.00% $187.92 $508.OE $50,808. After Market Encryption Upgrades AES for Police 30 T7936A APX UCM UPGRADE CD. 1 $57.50 $57.50 26.99% $15.52 $41.9E $41.9 30a CA00182AR ADD:AES ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE. 65 $696.00 $45,240.00 27.00% $187.92 $508.0E $33,025.2 Standalone Items 31 RMNS070A DESKTOP MIC(GCAI). 15 $185.76 $2,786.4C 27.001A $50.16 $135.6 $2,034. 32 7012074001 BRACKET,BRACKET,WORKSTATION. 30 $3.6 $108.0c 20.00% $0.72 $2.8 $86. 33 NNTN8844A CHARGER,MULTI-UNIT,IMPRES 2,6-DISP, 43 $1,420.2 $61,068.6C 27.00% $383.45 $1,036.7 $44,580.2 Police Mobiles with AES(Utah Bundle APX'"6500/Enh Series Package,$900 Trade-In Included) 34 M25URS9PW1BN APX6500 ENHANCED 7/800 MHZ MOBILE. 568 $3,253.0 $1,847,704.00 74.67% $2,428.91 $824.0 $468,083.1 34a G66BF ADD:DASH MOUNT 02 APXM. 568 $138.00 $78,384.00 27.00% $37.26 $100.71 $57,220.3 34b GAOO580AA ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 568 $495.0C $281,160.0 47.00% $232.65 $262.3 $149,014.8 34c G51AU ENH:SMARTZONE OPERATION APX6500. 568 $1,320.0 $749,760.0 47.00% $620.4C $699.6 $397,372.8 34d G78AT ENH:3 YEAR ESSENTIAL SVC. 568 $176. $99,968. 0.00% $0.0 $176.0 $99,968. 34e GA01606AA ADD:NO GPS/WI-FI ANTENNA NEEDED. 568 $0. $0.0 0.00% $0.00 $0.01 $0.0 34f B18CR ADD:AUXILIARYSPKR 7.5 WATTAPX. 568 $66.0 $37,488. 47.00% $31.02 $34.9 $19,868. 34g G843AH ADD:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 568 $523.00 $297,064.0 47.00% $245.83 $277.1 $157,443.9 34h GA00804AA ADD:APX 02 CH(GREY). 568 $541. $307,288.0 27.00% $146.0 $394.9 $224,320.2 34i G444AH ADD:APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE. 568 $0.0C $0.0c 0.00% $0.00 $0.04 $0.0 34j G335AW ADD:ANT 1/4 WAVE 762-870MHZ. 568 $15.0 $8,520.00 47.00% $7.05 $7.951 $4,515.6 34k G806BL ENH:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OP APX. 568 $567.00 $322,056.00 47.00 $266AS $300.5 $170,689.6 341 W22BA ADD:STD PALM MICROPHONE APX. 568 $79.00 $44,872.00 47.00% $37.13 $41.8 $23,782.1 34m G361AH ENH:P25 TRUNKING SOFTWARE APX. 568 $330.00 $187,440.00 47.00% $155.1c $174.9 $99,343.2 Police Mobiles with AES(Utah Bundle APXT"6500/Enh Series Package,$900 Trade-In Included) 35 M25URS9PW1BN APX6500 ENHANCED 7/800 MHZ MOBILE. 44 $3,253.00 $143,132.00 74.67% $2,428.9 $824.0 $36,259.9 35a G90AC ADD:NO MICROPHONE NEEDED APX. 44 $0.00 $0.0c 0.001/ $0.00 $0. $0.0 35b G72AD ADD:APX 03 HANDHELD CH. 44 $1,041.0 $45,804. 27.00% $281.0 $759.9 $33,436.9 35c GAOO580AA ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 44 $495.00 $21,780. 47.00% $232.65 $262.3 $11,543.4 35d G51AU ENH:SMARTZONE OPERATION APX6500. 44 $1,320.0 $58,080. 47.00% $620.4C $699.6 $30,782.4 35e G67DR ADD:REMOTE MOUNT O3 APXM. 44 $327.0C $14,388. 27.00% $88.29 $238.7 $10,503.2 35f G78AT ENH:3 YEAR ESSENTIAL SVC. 44 $176.00 $7,744.0 0.00% $0.0 $176.0 $7,744. 35g GA01606AA ADD:NO GPS/WI-FI ANTENNA NEEDED. 44 $0.0c $0.0c 0.00% $0.00 $0.0 $0.0 35h B18CR ADD:AUXILIARY SPKR 7.5 WATTAPX. 44 $66.0 $2,904.0 47.00% $31.02 $34.9 $1,539.1 35i G843AH ADD:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 44 $523.00 $23,012.00 47.00% $245.81 $277.1 $12,196.3 35j G444AH ADD:APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE. 44 $0.Cq $O.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.0 35k G335AW ADD:ANT 1/4 WAVE 762-870MHZ. 44 $15.00 $660.00 47.00% $7.05 $7.95 $349.8 351 G806BL ENH:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OP APX. 44 $567.00 $24,94S.0C 47.00% $266AS $300.51 $13,222. 35m G361AH ENH:P25 TRUNKING SOFTWARE APX. 44 $330.00 $14,520.00 47.00% $155.1c $174.9C $7,695.6 Police Portables with AES(Utah Bundle APXTm 6000 Series Package,$700 Trade-In Included) 36 H98UCF9PW6BN JAPX6000700/800 MODEL 2.5 PORTABLE. 628 $3,595.00 $2,257,660.0 63.47° $2,281.8 $1,313.2C $824,689.6 36a QA05570AA ALT.U-ION IMPRES21P683400MAH. 628 $110. $69,080. 27.00% $29.7 $80.3 $50,428. 36b Q361AR ADD:P259600BAUDTRUNKING. 628 $330. $207,240.0 44.00% $145.2 $184.8 $116,054. 36c H38BT ADD:SMARTZONE OPERATION. 628 $1,320.0 $828,960.0 44.004 $580.8 q 5739.2q $464,217.6 36d Q58AL ADD:3Y ESSENTIAL SERVICE. 628 $121.Cq $75,988. 0.00%1 $0.0 $121.Oq $75,988. 14 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 36e QA00580AC ADD:TDMA OPERATION. 628 $495.00 $330,860.0 44.00% $217.SC $277.2 $174,081.6 36f Q806BM ADD:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OPERATION. 628 $567.00 $356,076.0 44.00% $249.4E $317.5 $199,402.5 36g H122BR ALT:1/4 WAVE 7/8 STUBBY(NAR6595). 628 $26.00 $16,328. 27.00% $7.02 $18.9 $11,919. 36h Q629AK ENH:AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 628 $523.00 $328,444.0 44.00% $230.11 $292.8 $183,928.6 37 NNTN8863A CHARGER,SINGLE-UNIT,IMPRES 2,3A,100 628 $169.56 $106,483.6E 26.81% $45.46 $124.1 $77,934. Standalone Items 38 PMNN4486A BATT IMPRES 2 LIION R IP67 3400T. 628 $179.30 $112,600.4 27.00% $48.41 $130.8 $82,198.9 39 NTN2570C ASSEMBLY ACCESSORY WIRELESS ACCY KIT 628 $350.46 $220,088.81 27.00% $94.62 $255.8 $160,667.5 40 PMMN4099CL AUDIO ACCESSORY-REMOTE SPEAKER 628 $142.5 $89,527.6 27.00� $38.4 $104.0 $65,355.9 41 HLN6875A BELT CLIP 3INCH. 628 $14.0 $8,817.1 26.991 $3.791 $10.2 After Market Encryption Upgrades JAESforlegacy Fire Radios 42 IT7936A APX UCM UPGRADE CD. 1 $57.5q $57.5C 26.99% $15.52 $41.91 $41.9 42a CA00182AR ADD:AES ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE. 42 $696.00 $29,232.00 27.00% $187.92 $508.0 $21,339.3 Radio Management for loading flashes APXT"Radio Management and programming radios(tethered) 43 T7914A RADIO MANAGEMENT ONLINE. 1 $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.0C $0.0 43a UA00049AA ADD:RADIO MANAGEMENT LICENSES 1622 $110.00 $178,420.00 27.00% $29.70 $0.02 $0.0 44 PSV01S01987A RADIO MANAGEMENT(RM)TRAINING 2 $1,500.0c $3,000.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.0c $0.0 45 Incentive .Additional trade-in incentive of 1 -$311,400.0 -$311,400.00 0.00% $0.0 -$311,400.0 -$311,400. Net Total $5,598,775.01 The Utah BUNDLE PACKAGE PRICING includes$900 Trade-In for Mobile Radios and$700 Trade-In for Portable Radios and is including in the Estimated Tax $0.00 pricing discount line item.We have given an extra$200,1000+Volume Trade-In as well(Item 43). Estimated Freight $0.00 Quote and Pricing valid until December 30,2022 and contingent on$5,000,000.00 or more purchased by this date Grand Total $5,598,775.01 Pricing includes all discounts and trade-in incentives on a one for one trade in basis and trade in concession Motorola Contact:Walter Whately,Area Sales Manager,520-457-8604,walter.whately@motorolasolutions.com 15 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Attachment #� CONFIDENTIAL From: Chief Mike Brown To: City Council Re: Hiring Bonuses and Retention Bonuses — Salt Lake City Police Department Summary: The Salt Lake City Police Department(SLCPD) is committed to recruiting the best and brightest individuals to join its team to help provide a safe and thriving community.Today,law enforcement agencies across the country continue experiencing challenges recruiting and hiring qualified police candidates. To that end,the department is seeking funding to provide a hiring bonus of$1o,000 to lateral officers with a two-year commitment to employment with the department.Additionally,the department is seeking funding to provide a $5,000 bonus to qualified new SLCPD officers who have graduated from a self-sponsored, state-certified Utah Peace Officer Standards and Training(POST) academy. Finally,the department is seeking funding to provide a one-time retention bonus for current sworn members. Current Staffing: The police department currently has 47 sworn vacancies out of its authorized staffing level of 597.The total number of resignations and retirements for FY 23 is currently at 23. If that current pace 46 employees per month)continues through the end of the fiscal year,the department predicts losing 55 total sworn employees by June 30, 2023. The department is proposing a multifaceted approach to improving sworn staffing utilizing overtime funding to ensure the department can provide,maintain and improve call responsiveness to community needs. While many other law enforcement jurisdictions have offered new hiring or lateral hiring bonuses greater than $15,000,the Salt Lake City Police Department is approaching funding this bonus using ARPA funding to reduce impact on the city's general fund.The department recognizes the competition that exists nationally to recruit officers with hiring bonuses and may need to reevaluate its approach. 16 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Hiring Bonus: The lateral hiring bonus would provide greater incentive for a person who is law enforcement certified to leave their current department and to seek employment with the SLCPD. Hiring lateral officers will allow the department to reduce its sworn vacant positions faster than relying on a new hire recruit class.A lateral officer can be patrolling solo within approximately io-12 weeks of hire.Whereas, a new hire,with no law enforcement certification,will be patrolling solo at least 40-42 weeks from the start of their recruit class start date. Lateral Hiring bonus-Tiered rate based on length of commitment #year commitment 2 Bonus year 1 $ 10,000 Pensionable cost $ 4,680 # of officers estimated to hire 25 Total Cost $ 367,000 ARPA Funded $ 200,000 General Fund FY 23 $ 83,500 General Fund FY 24 -if approved for ongoing funding $ 83,500 If a lateral officer leaves employment with the SLCPD prior to the end of the employment commitment,there would be a requirement to repay the bonus prorated for time of commitment that was met.A proposal for repayment would be worked on jointly with the City's Human Resources and City Attorney's Office. For each new lateral hire,the department could likely save $1682 per week,which is currently being spent to backfill those patrol shifts using overtime. The department is also proposing providing a hiring bonus to qualified candidates who graduate from a self- sponsored, state certified satellite police academy.These candidates must meet all SLCPD hiring standards. This would provide $5000 to the qualified applicant. Post Academy Recruit Bonus Hiring Bonus $ 5,000 Pensionable Cost $ 2,340 Estimated number of hires 5 17 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Total Cost $ 36,700 ARPA Funded $ 36,700 General Fund $ - The department is currently accelerating and prioritizing hiring but key to maintaining staffing stability is to slow the department's separation rate. Providing a retention bonus would provide further incentive to current sworn employees so the department could keep sworn FTE at a higher level than is currently being experienced.A retention bonus would be offered to most sworn employee excluding any officers who was hired and accepted a bonus and long-term military until those employees return to their regular duties within the department,if within the retention period.The retention bonus would be offered to the employee on their hiring date anniversary.This would stagger retention periods over the course of a calendar year, splitting it over two fiscal years and thereby preventing the potential of a mass calendar year retirement. Retention bonus -Tiered rate based on length of commitment #year commitment 1 2 Total Bonus $ 5,000 $ 8,000 Pensionable Cost $ 2,340 $ 3,744 # of officers estimated 16 513 529 Total Cost $ 117,440 $ 6,024,672 $ 6,142,112 ARPA Funded $ 117,440 $ 4,104,000 $ 4,221,440 General Fund FY 23 $ - $ 960,336 $ 960,336 General Fund FY 24-if approved as an ongoing program $ - $ 960,336 $ 960,336 Total Retention and Hiring Program Cost Program Total Cost Estimate ARPA GF - 23 GF- 24 Lateral Hiring $ 367,000 $ 200,000 $ 83,500 $ 83,500 18 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Academy Hiring $ 36,700 $ 36,700 $ - $ - Retention $ 6,142,112 $ 4,221,440 $ 960,336 $ 96o,336 Total $ 6,545,812 $ 4,458,140 $ 1,043,836 $ 1,043,836 The department has carefully evaluated these proposals using our best educated judgement to predict future hiring. There is no guarantee to the estimated number of new hires. I look forward to further discussion with you about these matters. Respectfully submitted, Chief Mike Brown Salt Lake City Police Department 19 Impact Fees - Summary Confidential Data pulled 12/28/2022 Unallocated Budget Amounts:by Major Area Area Cost Center UnAllocated Notes: Cash Impact fee-Police 8484001 $ 989,579 A Impact fee-Fire 8484002 $ 1,479,222 B Impact fee-Parks 8484003 $ 12,150,505 C Impact fee-Streets 8484005 $ 4,182,237 D $ 18,801,543 E=A+B+C+D Expiring Amounts:by Major Area,by Month Calendar Fiscal Total Month Quarter Police Fire Parks Streets 202207(Ju12022) 2023Q1 - 202208(Aug2022) 2023Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202209(Sep2022) 2023Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202210(Oct2022) 2023Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - M 202211(Nov2022) 2023Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Current Month N 202212(Dec2022) 2023Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - } 202301(Jan2023) 2023Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - LL 202302(Feb2023) 2023Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202303(Mar2023) 2023Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202304(Apr2023) 2023Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202305(May2023) 2023Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202306(Jun2023) 2023Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202307(Ju12023) 2024Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202308(Aug2023) 2024Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202309(Sep2023) 2024Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202310(Oct2023) 2024Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - N 202311(Nov2023) 2024Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - O 202312(Dec2023) 2024Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - } 202401(Jan2024) 2024Q3 $ $ $ $ $ LL 202402(Feb2024) 2024Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202403(Mar2024) 2024Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202404(Apr2024) 2024Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202405(May2024) 2024Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202406(Jun2024) 2024Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202407(Ju12024) 2025Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202408(Aug2024) 2025Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202409(Sep2024) 2025Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202410(Oct2O24) 2025Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Lf') 202411(Nov2024) 2025Q2 $ $ $ $ $ O 202412(Dec2024) 2025Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $174 - 202501(1an2025) 2025Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - L}L 202502(Feb2025) 2025Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ 132,793 $ 132,793 202503(Mar2025) 2025Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ 24,194 $ 24,194 202504(Apr2025) 2025Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ 260,338 $ 260,338 202505(May2025) 2025Q4 $ $ $ $ 277,473 $ 277,473 202506(Jun2025) 2025Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ 28,350 $ 28,350 202507(Jui2025) 2026Q1 $ $ $ $ 121,823 $ 121,823 202508(Aug2025) 2026Q1 $ $ $ $ 194,127 $ 194,127 O 202509(Sep2025) 2026Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ 215,520 $ 215,520 cV 202510(Oct2025) 2026Q2 $ $ $ 679,086 $ 135,760 $ 814,847 202511(Nov2O25) 2026Q2 $ $ $ 987,055 $ 1,256,504 $ 2,243,559 202512(Dec2025) 2026Q2 $ $ $ 26,719 $ 113,748 $ 140,467 Total,Currently Expiring through Dec 2025 $ 0 $ - $ 1,692,860 $ 2,760,629 $ 4,453,490 Impact Fees Confidential Data pulled 12/28/2022 AAA BBB CCC DDD=W-BBB-CCC U nAl located Allocation Budget Allocation YTD Allocation Remaining Budget Police Amended Encumbrances Expenditures Appropriation Amount Sum of Police Allocation Sum of Police Allocation Sum of Police Allocation Remaining Descri tiara Cost Cen Budget Amended Encumbrances Sum of Police Allocation YID I Appropriation 9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 $ - Impact fee-Pat 8484001 $ Bridge W Bud-. 8418005 $ - ; - ; - $ - Fmpactfee-StreersWemMe 8484005 $ $ - 989,579 Ira ct fee-Fire 8484002 $ - ; - ; - $ - Bikewa Urban Trails 8418003 $ - ; - $ - $ - Gladiola Street 8MIfi001 $ $ - 8484001 A Public Safety Building Replrnn W5005 $ 14,0fi8 $ 14,068 $ - $ 0 Eastside Pr- M19201 $ 21,639 $ - $ - $ 21,639 Police Ira ad Fee Refunds M21102 237,W6 $ $ - $ 237,606.45 Grand Total 273,314 14,068 259,246 Allocation Budget Allocation Allocation Remaining Fire Amended Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Appropriation Fire I,W Fee ACOvi ? V Sum of Fire Allocation Sum of Fire Allocation Sum of Fire Allocation Remaining Description Cost Cen Budget Amended Encumbrances Sum of Fire Allocation YFD Ex Appropriation Fire's -ultant's rmtrmt 8419202 $ 3,0]9 $ 3,021 $ - 58.00 I,.Fire4ralningFac. a4zo431 $ - ; - ; Grand Total 3,079 3,021 - 58.00 84a4ogz B Allocation Budget Allocation Allocation Remaining Amended Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Appropriation Parks Part¢I,wd Fee ACOvi ? V Sum of Parks Allocation Sum of Parks Allocation Sum of Parks Allocation Remaining Description Cost Cen Budget Amended Encumbrances Sum of Par"Allocation YFD 1 Appropriation Emigration Open Space ACQ 8422423 $ ]00,000 $ - $ ]0],192 $ (7,192) ]R Boat Ram 8420144 $ 3,33, $ - $ 3,33] $ - Fmium-Cand..House 8420130 $ 261,187 $ - $ 261,187 $ - Park'sConmftarflf C rdmrt M192M $ 2'638 $ 2,s91 $ - $ 42 Cwide D Lease Ira MiW02 $ 23,262 $ 23,000 $ - $ 262 Waterpark Redevelopment Plan M21402 $ 16,959 $ 1,705 $ 14,873 $ 381 Rosewood Park 841]013 $ 1,056 $ - $ - $ 1,056 Jordan R 3Creel¢Confluence 841]018 $ 1,5]0 $ - $ - $ 1,s]0 $12,150,505 Jordan IFTrad Land umitn 841]Ol] $ 2,946 $ - $ - $ 2,996 Ira IParkShmie ' M19103 $ 6,398 $ - $ - $ 6,3% 91ine rk 8416W5 $ 16,495 $ 855 $ ],]45 $ 7 ,B95 8489003 C RichPrk Comm Garden 8420138 $ 12,431 $ 4,328 $ - $ 8,103 Redwood Meadows Park Dev 841]014 $ 9,350 ; - $ - $ 9,350 Tmtlhead Pro uisition M21403 $ 275,000 ; - $ 253,170 $ 21,830 Fisher House loE=Ctr 8921901 $ 455,030 ; 365,1% $ 64,525 $ 25,348 IF Pro uisition 3 Creeks 8420406 $ 56,109 ; - $ 1,302 $ 54,808 Marmalade Park Block Phase IF 8417011 $ 1,042,699 ; 935,679 ; 24,874 $ 12,141 Cn #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 $ 254,159 ; 133,125 ; 5,]16 $ 115,318 FY20 Brid.to Badmom 8420430 $ 156'565 ; 16,348 ; 22,490 $ 11],]z8 ._Ph2 Foothill Traik 8420420 $ 122'281 ; - ; 60 $ 122,222 9Line Orchard 8420136 $ 156,827 ; 10,265 $ 3,950 $ 142,612 Three Creeks West Bank N-Park 8422403 $ 150,736 ; - $ - $ 150,]36 Historic Renovation AllenParK 8922410 $ '0,000 ; 260,376 $ - $ 159,624 Nose Park Ne"hboriraad Center 8923903 $ 160,819 ; - $ - $ 1fi0,819 RAC Pla round w0h ShadeSails 8422415 $ 179,323 ; 5] $ 1]9,266 Brid a to Badonan 8418005 $ 266,306 ; 10,285 $ 4,051 $ M 90 900 S River Parkrte Sor Field WYM406 $ 287,848 ; - $ - $ 287,848 H htin NE Baball Field 8423409 $ 300,000 ; - ; - $ 3W,000 SLC Foothillse s land Ac uis0ian 8422413 $ 319,139 ; - ; - $ 319,139 Parle's Tnil Des"n&Constr 841]012 $ 327,678 ; - ; - $ 327,678 Jordan Prk Event Grounds M201M $ 428,074 ; 19,719 ; 7,448 $ 400,906 Wasatch Hollow Ira ments M20142 $ 446,825 $ 21,823 ; 10,]]1 $ 414,230 Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathwa 8422414 $ 510,000 $ 34,234 $ 10,127 $ 4fi5,638 Gatewa Trion le Pro Park 84234W $ 499,563 $ - ; - $ 4%,563 Gree MC Pla round Phase II 8423405 $ 521,564 $ - ; - $ 521,564 n loo zoo E D..n 8422406 $ 608,490 $ - ; 2,452 $ 606,038 Mem.Tree Grove Desi n&Infra 842340] $ 86],%1 $ - ; - $ 86],962 SLCFmothtllsTratlh.adDevelpmnt 8422412 $ 1,304,682 $ 88,382 ; - $ 1,216:300 GlendaleWtr rk Ms ln"rimb 8422406 $ 3,1]],849 $ 267,681 ; 10,900 $ 2,746,2W Pioneer Park M19150 $ 3,149,123 $ 67,450 $ 22,109 $ 3,059,564 Glendale R Tonal Park -1 MB450 4, 2,263,009 1,591,335 17,9 350 No q q $ 4,350,O 00 Grand TOGI 21,852,274 97,931 Sum of Street Allocation Sum of Street Allocation Sum of Street Allocation Desgi lion Cost Cen Budget Amended Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YFD Remaining Appropriation Trans Master Plan 841906 $ 13,000 ; 13,000 ; - $ - 9 Line Central Ninth 8918011 $ 63,955 $ - ; 0,955 $ - 90055i nalIm rovements IF 8422fi1s $ ]0,000 $ - ; 7 0,No $ - 500/200SSi-IMeconstnu:tio 8912001 $ 15,026 $ 11,]03 $ 3,3z3 $ - 4,182,237 Trans rf, Safe Ira rove M17007 $ 1,291 $ - $ - $ 1,292 Gladiola Street 840fi001 $ 16'IN $ 13,865 $ - $ 2,244 Urban Trails FY22IF MD619 $ 6,500 $ - $ - $ 6,5W 8484005 D Tm-podatn Safety Imprvmt IF MD620 $ 44,400 $ 3,939 $ 28,319 $ 12,142 Stre Vt onsuBant'A:wrtrad M19203 $ 29,817 $ 1],442 $ - $ 12,3]4 Trans Safety Improvements 841907 $ 13,4]3 $ - $ - $ 13,4- 500 to 200 S 8418016 $ 22,]49 $ - $ - $ 22,]44 Condor Transformatiars IF MD608 $ 25,398 $ - $ - $ 25,398 900 South 9Line RR Crag IF MD604 $ 28,No $ - $ - $ 28,000 1700S Corridor Tram frmth IF MD622 $ 35'300 $ - $ - $ 35,300 Cora let.Street Enhancements M20120 $ 35,391 $ - $ - $ 35,392 200S TranMtCmpltSI,tSuppl IF MD602 $ 3],422 $ - $ - $ 3],422 Trans Safe Imp- M20110 $ 56,]80 $ 20,697 $ - $ 38,063 300 N Corapl.he Street Recmns I MB606 $ 40'No $ - $ - $ 40,000 1300 S Bt e B d.str 8416004 $ 4"833 $ - $ - $ 42,M Loral Link Construction IF M4 606 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 400 South Waduct Trail IF M4 611 $ 91.0 $ - $ - $ 90,000 Neighborhood Byways IF M4 614 $ 104:510 $ - $ - $ 104,500 Transit Cap-Freq Trans Routes MB608 $ 110,No $ - $ - $ 110,0D0 Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design M12002 $ 124,591 $ - $ - $ 124,593 W inia Street Reconstroction MB624 $ 191,6fi3 $ - $ - $ 141,663 300 North R-onstrurtion MB622 $ 154,]39 $ - $ - $ 154,71 1200 East Recenstruawn MB628 $ 158,570 $ - $ - $ 158:570 900 South Rm-truction MB62] $ 1]1,949 $ - $ - $ 171,944 Bikewa Urban Trails M18003 $ 1.,- $ - $ - $ 181,846 TransporfationSafetylmprov IF M21500 $ 281,58, $ 10,340 $ 34,2]2 $ 16,9]4 200 S R.cen Trans Corridor IF M23602 $ 252,.0 $ - $ - $ 252,000 West Tma le Rr-tructum MB626 $ 311,631 $ - $ - $ 331633 Street Improve R.censtroc 20 M20125 $ ]80,182 $ 147,983 $ 248,890 $ 383,309 1100 East Hi hland Drive M23623 $ 500,728 $ - $ - $ 5W,728 IF Complete Street Enhancement M21502 $ 625,000 $ - $ - $ 625,ON 2100 South Reconstrroction 8923fi29 $ 660,410 $ - $ - $ Goo,410 Traffic Signal Upgrades 841%08 $ 450 $ - $ - $ 450 Traffic Si nalU fades 8421501 $ 836,736 $ 65,846 $ 92,0]5 $ ]28,115 1300 East Reconstruction M23625 $ 812,805 $ - $ 9]1 $ 811,834 200 South Recenstructum 8423621 $ 915,151 $ - $ - $ 915,151 200 South Phase 2IF M23305 $ 1,120,000 $ $ $ 1,120,000 Grand Total 9,010,976 304,815 491,804 8,214,356 Sum of Budget-Amended Sum of Encum-brances Sum of-.Expenditures Sum of Remaining Appropriation 1 V,V01,543 Total 31,139,643 2,584,913 2,083,139 26,471,591 E=A+B+C+D TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE Item 135 v " MOTION SHEET T e Q,__ -._ -Z CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO: City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE: March 21,2023 RE: Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)Ordinance Amendment PLNPCM2O22-00475 MOTION 1(close and defer action to a future date) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2(close and adopt with owner occupancy requirement only in single-family residential districts) I move that the Council adopt the ordinance,and include the following conditions: • Remove conditional use requirements for ADUs • Establish the maximum size of a detached ADU is 1,00o square feet • Retain the owner occupancy requirement for properties with single-family homes and ADUs in the FR,R-1,SR-1,and SR-1A zoning districts • The minimum corner side yard setback is 20%of the lot width,or 10 feet whichever is less • Provide a minimum of one off-street parking space for Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)residents,with the following exceptions: o If the property is within 1/2 mile of a designated bicycle lane or path o If the property is within 1/4 mile of transit o If sufficient space for on-street parking is available in front of the primary residence (Optional)I further move that the Council adopt the following legislative intents: • It is the intent of the Council to revisit this requirement in three years.In the interim,data will be collected and reviewed regarding numbers of ADUs constructed during this three-year period,barriers to their construction,and impacts to neighborhoods. • It is the intent of the Council to provide$1 million in one-time funding to provide financial support for ADU construction. • It is the intent of the Council to fund 2 additional Civil Enforcement employees for ADU enforcement. Staff note on logistics for intents relating to the annual budget:The Council may choose to adopt these legislative intents in conjunction with action on the ADU ordinance,but no funding will be finalized until the annual budget is adopted in mid-June. The Mayor could choose to include these in her recommended budget presented to the Council on May 2,or the Council could choose to add these items subsequent to receiving the recommendation from the Mayor. MOTION g(close and adopt with owner occupancy requirement citywide) I move that the Council adopt the ordinance,and include the following conditions: • Remove conditional use requirements for ADUs • Establish the maximum size of a detached ADU is 1,00o square feet • Retain the owner occupancy requirement for properties with ADUs • The minimum corner side yard setback is 20%of the lot width,or 10 feet whichever is less • Provide a minimum of one off-street parking space for Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)residents,with the following exceptions: o If the property is within 1/2 mile of a designated bicycle lane or path o If the property is within 1/4 mile of transit o If sufficient space for on-street parking is available in front of the primary residence (Optional)I further move that the Council adopt the following legislative intents: • It is the intent of the Council to revisit this requirement in three years.In the interim,data will be collected and reviewed regarding numbers of ADUs constructed during this three-year period,barriers to their construction,and impacts to neighborhoods. • It is the intent of the Council to provide$1 million in one-time funding to provide financial support for ADU construction. • It is the intent of the Council to fund 2 additional Civil Enforcement employees for ADU enforcement. Staff note on logistics for intents relating to the annual budget:The Council may choose to adopt these legislative intents in conjunction with action on the ADU ordinance,but no funding will be finalized until the annual budget is adopted in mid-June. The Mayor could choose to include these in her recommended budget presented to the Council on May 2,or the Council could choose to add these items subsequent to receiving the recommendation from the Mayor. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCILCOM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ,,, ,V I'n u ,,,,, Item Schedule: Briefing:January 17,2023, February 7,2023,March 7,2023, TO: City Council Members March 14,2023 Set Date:January 17,2023, FROM: Brian Fullmer March 7,2023 Policy Analyst Public Hearing: February 7,2023, March 21,2023 DATE: March 21,2023 Potential Action: March 21,2023 RE: Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Amendment PIENPCM2022-00475 MARCH 21, 2023 UPDATE The Council held a follow-up discussion at its March 14, 2023 meeting to narrow options to consider in preparation for a potential vote at the March 21, 2023 meeting.Most Council Members did not support completely removing the owner occupancy requirement.Two options for this requirement being considered are: • Retaining the owner-occupied requirement for properties with single-family homes and ADUs in the FR(Foothills), R-1 (Single-Family Residential), and SR-1/SR-1A(Special Development Pattern Residential) zoning districts.The owner occupancy requirement would be removed in other zoning districts where ADUs are allowed,where there are existing commercial/rental and multifamily uses currently. • Retain the owner occupancy requirement for properties citywide where ADUs are allowed, with a legislative intent to revisit this requirement in three years. In the interim, data would be collected and reviewed on ADUs constructed,barriers to their construction, and neighborhood impacts. In addition, Council Members requested the following legislative intents that relate to the annual budget • It is the intent of the Council to provide $1 million in one-time funding to provide financial support for ADU construction. • It is the intent of the Council to fund 2 additional Civil Enforcement employees for ADU enforcement. Staff note on logistics: The Council may choose to adopt these legislative intents in conjunction with action on the ADU ordinance, but no funding will be finalized until the annual budget is adopted in mid-June. The Mayor could choose to include these in her recommended budget CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 presented to the Council on May 2, or the Council could choose to add these items subsequent to receiving the recommendation from the Mayor. A second public hearing on this topic will be held during the Tuesday,March 21 formal meeting.The Council could vote that evening. The following information was provided for previous Council briefings. It is included again for background purposes. MARCH 14, 2023 UPDATE The Council continued its discussion on proposed changes to the Accessory Dwelling Units(ADU) ordinance that include an owner occupancy requirement,concerns related to affordability of constructing ADUs and other barriers to their creation.Council Members also discussed potential tools to assist with reducing the cost of ADU construction, challenges with enforcing violations, and potential fees to offset costs of additional ADU enforcement.The need for additional market rate housing was discussed and the potential for ADUs to help fill that need. Mayor Mendenhall addressed the Council during the March 7, 2023 work session discussion to share her support of the Planning Commission's recommendation on maintaining owner occupancy requirements. The mayor also stated the desire for ADUs to be a wealth building tool for individuals and families. Planning staff clarified the proposed owner occupancy requirement is based on the property use rather than underlying zoning.Thus,if commercial use is allowed on property that is used for residential purposes,the owner occupancy requirement would apply for an ADU on that property.If there is commercial use of the property,owner occupancy is not required. The Council will hold further discussions during its March 14, 2023 work session meeting.A second public hearing will be held March 21, 2023 during the 7:0o pm formal meeting,prior to a potential Council vote that evening. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION After the public hearing on February 7th,some Council Members expressed interest in having additional work session discussion time to consider other options, and potentially reconsider some of the straw polls which were taken at the February 7th work session. As a reminder,the following straw polls were taken: • Supported keeping one off-street parking space. • Supported keeping the following exceptions to required off-street parking: o If the property is within 1/2 mile of a designated bicycle lane or path. o If the property is within 1/4 mile of transit. • Supported removing an exception to the off-street parking requirement if sufficient space for on- street parking is available in front of the house. • Supported increasing the maximum size of a detached ADU to l,000 square feet. • Did not support the Planning staffs recommended 1,200 square foot maximum size of a detached ADU on lots 12,000 square feet or larger. • Supported retaining the owner occupancy requirement. • Supported amending corner side yard setbacks to 20%of the lot width or to feet,whichever is less. This would allow an ADUs on corner lots to be located closer to the street than to an adjacent property. • Supported removing the conditional use requirement for ADUs. • Did not support limiting ADU height to the principal structure's height. The following is a list of additional ideas that have been raised by Council Members since the last discussion,grouped by topic area: Page 12 1. Ideas relating to the owner occupancy requirement: a. Option to remove the requirement altogether. b. Option to require construction of ADUs to be owner occupied for i year,with the option to remove the restriction after one year of no substantiated zoning or civil enforcement complaints. c. (could be combined with a or b)Require a business license and institute a fee to offset costs of enforcement, and require commitment to not use as a short term rental ■ For any landlord using an ADU as a rental.Two different fees have been suggested (subject to cost justification), $l,000 per year or$2,400 per year($200 per month) ■ Allow owner occupied properties to have this fee waived ■ The fee cannot be waived by the Good Landlord program d. Add a sunset clause for the owner occupancy requirement citywide.If there is no additional Council action,this requirement would sunset in 24 months(or some other period). e. Potential ideas that may be related to owner-occupancy reconsideration: ■ reconsider straw poll relating to parking requirements for lots within 1/2 mile of designated bicycle lane ■ reconsider straw poll to increase the size from 720 to i000 square feet 2. Enforcement a. Add i or more employees(FTEs)in Civil Enforcement specifically to address ADU related violations including noise,illegal Short-Term Rentals, etc.Costs could be offset by fees (idea raised in item i.c.). Consider allocating funds in BudgetAmendment#5 as a Council- added item. 3. Incentives a. Use a legislative intent or allocate funds in Budget Amendment#5,or an upcoming RDA budget amendment,to make creation of affordable ADU programs a higher priority.The funding could address staffing costs to develop and administer programs as well as direct program costs such as incentives.Ideas raised include pre-approved development plans, subsidy for utility connection fees, direct financial support in form of grants or loans, examine other way's ADUs have shown to be expensive(fire sprinklers,etc.). 4. Other questions Council Members asked staff(this section may be updated prior to the March 7 discussion. It reflects questions as of March i. Council staff is working on gathering additional information). o To what extent has comment from the public and community councils addressed owner occupancy? o To what extent did the Planning Commission discuss owner occupancy? o To the extent that studies are cited in relation to the impacts of owner occupancy requirements,can Council staff thoroughly review those studies to provide Council Members specific information about whether any owner occupancy conclusions are objectively verifiable and applicable to different markets?Is owner occupancy isolated as a specific variable,or is it grouped with a list of other possible variables? o Are there stronger enforcement tools such as restrictive covenants that can help mitigate neighborhood impacts? Next steps: The Chair and Vice Chair are planning on a work session discussion March 7th, with a second public hearing and potential considerations for action March list,which is the next formal Council Meeting. FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING AND PUBLIC HEARING UPDATES Follow-up Briefing At the February 7, 2023 follow-up briefing,the Council reviewed five Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)topics Page 13 discussed at the previous briefing.These topics were parking requirements,maximum ADU size,owner occupancy requirement, setback, and a conditional use requirement. The Council held a series of straw polls indicating their positions on these various topics.The Council Chair reminded the public that these straw polls are not the final votes and Council Members may feel differently following the public hearing. (Refer to straw polls above.) Public Hearing Update Seventeen people spoke at the February 7, 2023 public hearing expressing support for,or opposition to, ADUs.Those in favor cited the need for additional quality, affordable housing in the city,ADUs provide a way to add moderate density to neighborhoods,and potential benefits to property owners. Suggestions were made to incentivize micro units,review fees and other permitting requirements,and require ADU compatibility with the lot's original structure. Those who expressed opposition to the proposal noted the difficulty enforcing on illegal short-term rentals, ADUs blocking light from neighbors'gardens and solar collectors,and potential negative impacts to neighborhoods. The Council closed the public hearing and deferred action to a future Council Meeting. BRIEFING UPDATE At the January 17, 2023 briefing,Council Members focused their discussion on five topics related to Accessory Dwelling Units(ADUs):parking requirements,maximum ADU size,owner occupancy,required setbacks,and conditional use requirements.A summary of each topic is included below, as well as potential straw polls for Council consideration. Potential Straw Polls Staff is including the following potential straw polls to help clarify the Council's wishes regarding five main topics discussed during the briefing. 1. Is the Council supportive of maintaining the existing requirement for a minimum of one off-street parking space for ADUs where the proposed exceptions do not apply? If so,does the Council support the following exceptions in the draft ordinance? a. The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off-street parking requirement. b. The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking requirement. c. The property is within one-half mile of a designated bicycle lane or path. 2. Does the Council wish to increase the maximum size of a detached ADU to: a. 720 square feet as proposed by Planning staff? b. i,000 square feet as proposed by the Planning Commission? C. 1,200 square feet on lots 12,000 square feet or larger? 3. Does the Council wish to maintain the current owner occupancy requirement? 4. Is the Council supportive of the proposed setback requirements shown below? a. A suggestion was made for corner side yard setbacks of 20%of the lot width or io feet, whichever is less.Is the Council supportive of this? 5. Does the Council wish to remove the conditional use requirement for ADUs? Parking Requirements The proposed ordinance maintains the requirement for one on-site parking space for an ADU.Under the proposal,the following circumstances allow this requirement to be waived: • The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off-street parking requirement. • The property already includes at least one accessible stall beyond the minimum parking requirement. • The property is within one-half mile of a designated bicycle lane or path. Page 14 Council Members discussed advantages and disadvantages of this requirement. It was noted the off-street parking requirement could be a barrier to some who would like to construct an ADU. Eliminating the requirement for off-street parking would potentially create additional issues for areas that have limited on- street parking or are near venues that draw large crowds and attendees often park in the nearby neighborhoods. Maximum AD U Size Planning staff recommended increasing the maximum size of a detached ADU from the current 650 square feet to 720 square feet. (The proposal allows detached AUDs up to 1,200 square feet on lots 12,000 square feet or larger.) During the Planning Commission briefing, Commissioners included a recommendation of increasing the maximum size to 1,000 square feet. The Council discussed potential neighborhood impacts if the maximum size is increased to 1,000 square feet. It was noted a compact two-bedroom ADU would be feasible if the maximum size was increased to 720 square feet. Owner Occupancy A robust discussion was held about the requirement for a property owner to reside on the property.A suggestion was made to remove this requirement,noting a reduction of the pool of potential buyers if the property is listed for sale. Other points raised were removing the owner occupancy requirement could exacerbate issues with absentee landlords,and requiring owner occupancy may lead to higher quality ADU materials and construction. A majority of Council Members expressed support for retaining the owner occupancy requirement. Required Setbacks Planning staff reviewed current and proposed setbacks for detached ADUs with the following table: .- - StandardM Current Requirement Proposed Requirement Minimum New accessory buildings and additions to 3 feat from Interior side or rear lot lines. Setback existing accessory buildings:4 feet from any side 10 feet from corner side lot line. or rear lot line. If accessory building is taller than 17 feet,setback must Second story additions: 10 feet from any side or be increased by 1 foot for every additional foot in height rear lot line,unless abutting an alley,in which case above 17'. setback can be reduced to 4 feet. If accessory building is taller than 17 feet,setback must be increased to 10 feet, unless abutting an alley, In which case setback can be reduced to 4 feet. Council Members discussed whether a io-foot setback from a corner side yard is appropriate. Planning staff stated the current ordinance does not specify setback requirements for detached ADUs on corner lots. Rather,it defers to general accessory building setbacks,which are not allowed less than 20 feet from the side yard property line on corner lots.They noted moving a detached ADU closer to the street would have less of an impact on abutting property.On narrower lots,a 20-foot setback in corner side yards may require an ADU close enough to the opposite property line that it prohibits the abutting property owner from adding an ADU to their property due to spacing requirements between dwelling units. A discussion was also held about potential impacts reducing the minimum side or rear yard setback from four feet to three feet. Under the proposal balconies would be allowed on the second story of a detached ADU and face any direction.They may not encroach into the required setback areas,contain HVAC equipment,or be used for storage. Page 15 Conditional Use Requirements Planning staff reviewed the conditional use requirement origin.They noted the Council's request for a process allowing public input on ADU petitions.Making ADUs a conditional use was the only option identified to meet this request. Planning said the Planning Commission has not denied any ADU applications.They stated detrimental neighborhood impacts related to ADUs that are not addressed in City Code are not happening.The Planning Commission added few conditions to ADU applications in more than three years. Planning staff calculated the time required to process 25 ADU applications per year equals one full time staff person. Some Council Members expressed concern about removing the conditional use process.They noted the public was told this would be part of the ADU process and now that may change. The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the City ordinance related to Accessory Dwelling Units(ADUs)making external units a permitted rather than conditional use,expand locations in the city where they can be built, simplify standards,and encourage their construction. At its February 9, 2022 meeting,the Planning Commission voted to initiate a petition making ADUs a permitted use in any zoning district where residential units are permitted.This includes ADUs that are internal,attached to a main structure,or in a detached building. Current code only allows ADUs in owner- occupied properties in the City that currently have single family homes (as a conditional use in single- family districts),although internal ADUs are allowed by right due to state code.The Planning Commission expressed a stated desire to expand opportunities for ADUs. City Council and Administrative staff input was also provided resulting in proposed changes summarized in the Additional Information section below. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal during its September 14, 2022 meeting and held a public hearing at which three people spoke.Comments focused on making ADUs affordable,support for owner occupancy of the main house,and a suggestion for City funding to assist homeowners to construct ADUs. Concerns cited include removing the conditional use could impact adjacent neighbor privacy, a lack of public comments when ADUs are constructed, and neighborhood impacts from additional on-street parking. Commissioners discussed increasing the maximum size of a detached ADU from the proposed 720 square feet to i,000 square feet.A motion was made to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council that includes a modification to increase the maximum size of a detached ADU to i,000 square feet.That motion passed 6-2.Those voting against the motion were not supportive of the i,000 square foot maximum. It should be noted the draft ordinance allows detached ADUs up to 1,200 square feet if the lot size exceeds 12,000 square feet,is outside a residential zoning district,or is part of a planned development that includes a minimum of four dwelling units. In response to a Council Member question, Planning staff clarified there is no minimum space between a detached ADU and the primary residence other than required fire code separation. The draft ordinance includes a requirement that the owner reside on the property.This requirement may be met by a person related to the property owner or a trustor of a family trust that owns the property living on the property. Exceptions of up to three years are provided for property owners who are on temporary work assignments,serve in the military, are on sabbaticals, or participating in voluntary service.An Page 16 additional exception is included for property owners who are placed in a hospital,nursing home, assisted living facility or other similar facility that provides medical care. Goal of the briefing:Review the proposed zoning and future land use map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. The Council may wish to discuss maximum ADU square footage of 720 square feet, 1,000 square feet,or larger based on lot size. 2. The proposed ordinance includes a requirement that the owner reside on the property as noted above.The Council may wish to discuss whether to keep this requirement. 3. The Council may wish to discuss incentive options for homeowners constructing ADUs to be rented at affordable rates, and potential sources of that funding. a. The Council,acting as the RDA board,allocated funding in the 9 line project area to assist in funding construction of ADUs, although this funding was limited to that project area. b. The Council has also directed funds from"Funding Our Future"sales tax revenue towards incentivizing development of affordable housing units and programs. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION As previously noted,there are several proposed changes to the ADU ordinance.These are summarized below. For the complete analysis,please see pages 2-10 of the Planning Commission staff report. Remove Conditional Use Requirement ADUs are currently permitted in two-family and multi-family zoning districts by-right when associated with a single-family dwelling. Detached ADUs in a single-family residential district are required to go through the conditional use process.It is worth noting House Bill 82 went into effect in October 2021 making internal ADUs permitted uses in single-family residential zones.The proposed ordinance aligns with that legislation. The proposal removes a conditional use requirement for detached ADUs in single-family residential districts.This would streamline the process for applicants and reduce staff and Planning Commission time needed to review ADU applications. Planning staff noted"Potential negative impacts of ADUs would continue to be managed by the development standards in the ADU Ordinance." Expand Where ADUs Can Be Built One goal of the proposed ADU amendments is to expand where they are allowed.Tables summarizing impacts to zoning districts under the proposed ADU amendments are included on pages 3-4 of the Planning Commission staff report.They are replicated in Attachment A to this report for convenience. Currently ADUs are allowed as a conditional use on properties used for single-family residential in residential zoning districts. In summary,the proposed changes would allow ADUs as a permitted rather than conditional use in single-family residential zoning districts, allow them as a permitted use in several lower intensity commercial zoning districts,transit station districts,form-based, and downtown zoning districts.ADUs would continue to be prohibited in manufacturing districts,and special purpose districts. Planning staff included the following maps on page 5 of the Planning Commission staff report showing current locations where ADUs are allowed and where they would be allowed under the proposal.The maps are included here for convenience. Page 17 Map showing where ADUs are currently allowed I y�.■y`�C.�N11 ..IP..s■ l��Ili ..11/ JY�■.■ ul1 r..C■11.10.' ■. IIII.IIIIYL■� - _ Legend - ADU Permitted(Detached or Intemal) _ Detached ADU Requies Conditional Use ADU Not Permitted Map showing where ADUs would be allowed under proposed changes Images Courtesy Salt Lake City Planning Division r 1r�ee�I i! �■7 I �,., Il�,i_I■i, DIY •C� �■■1 IIII S.� t� ��� 'I■1 IPIIEIi.......:�.a t�`Ir1' o::if■ss�iyin::uw■� ilT.- 1-�r . f .I.'..uM MWE ■, rMII ! �. Legend �-_I11■ _ADU Perm fitted(Detac hed or Internal) ULT41 ADU Not Permitted Adjust Size, Bulk, and Yard Requirements Page 8 The proposed amendment modifies size,bulk,and yard requirements to generally make them less restrictive.These are summarized in the following tables provided by the Planning Division. (Images depicting various standards are found on pages 7-8 of the Planning Commission staff report.) Internal ADUs Standard Current Requirements Proposed Requirement Maximum Size 50%of gross square footage of No maximum.Aligns with HB82. principal structure. Detached ADUs Standard Current Requirement Proposed Requirement Maximum Size 50%of principal structure's In residential zoning districts: footprint or 650 square feet, 720 square feet maximum. whichever is less Can be increased to 1,200 square feet if lot is 12,000 square feet or larger. Maximum Height 17 feet. 17 feet. If principal structure is taller Can be increased up to 24 feet than 17 feet,ADU can be the with an increased setback. same height as the principal structure,up to 24 feet. Minimum Setback New accessory buildings 3 feet from interior side or rear and additions to existing lot lines. accessory buildings: 4 feet from any side or rear lot line. io feet from corner side lot line. Second story additions: io If accessory building is feet from any side or rear lot line, taller than 17 feet, setback unless abutting an alley,in which must be increased by 1 foot for case the setback can be reduced every additional foot in height to 4 feet. above 17 feet. If accessory building is taller than 17 feet,setback must be increased to io feet, unless abutting an alley,in which case setback can be reduced to 4 feet. Introduce Alley Activation Requirements Detached ADUs are often constructed adjacent to public alleys,which provides an opportunity to activate the alleys.The proposed amendment adds requirements for ADUs abutting alleys to include lighting on the ADU to illuminate the abutting alley segment,and a path between the ADU and alley. Page 19 Keep Short-Term Rental Restrictions The proposed amendment maintains the current ordinance prohibition on short-term rentals.A definition of"short-term rental"as a dwelling unit offered for rent or lease for less than 3o days would be added. Adjust Other Requirements The proposal adjusts and clarifies requirements for decks,patios,and outdoor space. Rooftop patios continue to be prohibited,but balconies are permitted provided they meet setback requirements. Parking requirements for ADUs would be maintained much as they are if the proposed amendments are adopted. Proposed additions to parking requirements include circumstances under which the required off- street parking stall may be waived.These are: • The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off-street parking requirement. • The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking requirement. • The property is within one-half mile of a designated bicycle lane or path. KEY CONSIDERATION Planning staff identified one key consideration related to the proposal which is found on pages 10-12 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis,please see the staff report. Consideration i-How the proposal helps implement city goals and policies identified in adopted plans Planning staff reviewed how the proposed amendments align with goals and policies found in Plan Salt Lake(2o15)and Growing SLC:A Five-Year Housing Plan 2o18-2022(2017).They determined the proposal is consistent with several items found in the Growth,Housing,Transportation&Mobility,and Preservation chapters of Plan Salt Lake.Among the initiatives proposed changes align with are the following: • Locate new development in areas with existing infrastructure and amenities,such as transit and transportation corridors. • Encourage a mix of land uses. • Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land. • Accommodate and promote an increase in the city's population. • Encourage housing options that accommodate aging in place. • Enable moderate density increases within existing neighborhoods where appropriate. Planning also found the proposal is consistent with goals and objectives in Growing SLC.These include: • Review and modify land-use and zoning regulations to reflect the affordability needs of a growing, pioneering city. • Develop infill ordinances that promote a diverse housing stock,increase housing options,create redevelopment opportunities,and allow additional units within existing structures,while maintaining neighborhood impacts. • Revise the Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance to expand its application and develop measures to promote its use. • Support diverse and vibrant neighborhoods by aligning land use policies that promote a housing market capable of accommodating residents throughout all stages of life. ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Page I io Attachment C(pages 32-34)of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal.The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the Complies purposes,goals,objectives,and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific Complies purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the Proposed regulations would purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning take precedence over districts which may impose additional standards. overlay zoning districts, except for the Historic Preservation Overlay District.Amendments would be limited by additional standards in this district. The extent to which a proposed text amendment implements Complies best current,professional practices of urban planning and design. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • February 9, 2022-Petition initiated by Planning Commission. • May 12, 2022-Petition assigned to Michael McNamee,Principal Planner. • May 17, 2022-Application posted for online open house. • May 18, 2022-Notice mailed to all community councils. • March 30, 2022-45-day public comment period for recognized organizations ended. • September 2, 2022-Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. • September 8, 2022-Staff report posted to Planning's website. • September 14, 2022-Planning Commission meeting and public hearing. Positive recommendation forwarded to the City Council. • September 29, 2022-Ordinance requested from Attorney's Office. • November 28, 2022-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney's Office. • December 12, 2022-Transmittal received in City Council Office. Page 111 ATTACHMENT A: Proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit Use Change from Conditional to Permitted Use in Residential Zoning Districts Zoning District District Name FR-1 Foothills Estate Residential FR-2 Foothills Residential FR-3 Foothills Residential R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential Continue to Be Permitted Residential Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District SR-1&SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential R-2 Single-and Two-Family Residential RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential RMF-45 Moderate/High-Density Multi-Family Residential RMF-75 High-Density Multi-Family Residential RB Residential/Business R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use R-MU Residential/Mixed Use RO Residential/Office Special Purpose Districts Zoning District Name of District FP Foothills Protection AG Agricultural AG-2 Agricultural AG-5 Agricultural AG-20 Agricultural MU Mixed Use Page 12 Change From Prohibited to Permitted Use Commercial Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District CN Neighborhood Commercial SNB Small Neighborhood Business CB Commercial Business CS Community Shopping CC Corridor Commercial CSHBD Sugar House Business District CG General Commercial Transit Station Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District TSA-UC Urban Core TSA-UN Urban Neighborhood TSA-MUEC Mixed Use Employment Center TSA-SP Special Purpose Form-Based Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District FB-SC Special Purpose Corridor Core Subdistrict FB-SE Special Purpose Corridor Edge Subdistrict FB-UN1* Urban Neighborhood FB-UN2* Urban Neighborhood *Detached dwelling units currently permitted and will be removed from code Downtown Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District D-1 Central Business District D-2 Downtown Support District D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District DA Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District G-MU Gateway Mixed-Use Page 13 Continue to be Prohibited Manufacturing Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District M-1 Light Manufacturing M-2 Heavy Manufacturing Residential Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District SR-2 (Reserved) Special Purpose Zoning Districts Zoning District Name of District RP Research Park BP Business Park A Airport PL Public Lands PL-2 Public Lands I Institutional UI Urban Institutional OS Open Space NOS Natural Open Space MH Mobile Home Park EI Extractive Industries Page 14 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 2 1 A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 2 1 A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475 pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on September 14, 2022 to consider a petition submitted by the Planning Commission(Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475) to amend various sections of Title 2 1 A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations; and WHEREAS, at its September 14, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council") on said petition; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to revisit the issue of owner occupancy requirements in three years; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That Section 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the use category"Dwelling, accessory unit" in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts, which use category shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District FR-1/ FR-2/ FR-3/ R-1/ R-1/ R-1/ SR-1 SR-2 SR-3 R-2 RMF-30 MF-35 RMF-45 RMF-75 RE R-MU-35 R-MU-45 R-MU RO 43,560 21,780 12,000 12,000 7,000 5,000 Dwelling, P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P accessory unit SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 2IA.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts,which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District CN CB CSl CC CSHBDI CG SNB Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P P P P SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.035. That Section 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Dwelling: Accessory P P P P P P P P unit SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake ON Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts,which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.060. That Section 21A.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts,which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use G-MU Dwelling: Accessory unit P SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That Section 21 A.3 3.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Permitted Uses By District Use FB- FB-UN2 FB-SC FB-SE UN1 Dwelling: Accessory unit I P I P I P I P SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.050.13.2. That Subsection 21A.40.050.B.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: General Yard, Bulk and Height Limitations) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 2. Building Coverage: a. In the FR,R-1,R-2 and SR residential districts the maximum footprint of any accessory building, shall not exceed fifty percent(50%)of the building footprint of the principal structure except as follows: (1) Notwithstanding the size of the footprint of the principal building,at least 480 square feet of accessory building coverage shall be allowed subject to the compliance with all other requirements in Section 21A.40.050. (2) Accessory buildings constructed within the buildable area that are located between the rear facade of the principal building and the rear yard setback may exceed 720 square feet provided the building is located entirely within the buildable area and the property complies with the maximum building coverage requirements of the underlying zoning district. (3) The building coverage for a detached accessory dwelling unit shall be subject to the standards in 21A.40.200,regardless of the building coverage requirement in this section. (4) An accessory building that contains an accessory dwelling unit on the second level may exceed the maximum coverage up to the footprint of the accessory dwelling unit. b. The combined coverage for all hoop houses,greenhouses,and cold frames shall not exceed thirty five percent(35%)of the building footprint of the principal structure. SECTION 8. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.40.200. That Section 21A.40.200 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning:Accessory Uses,Buildings and Structures: Accessory Dwelling Units)shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.40.200: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: A. Purpose: the regulatory purpose of this section is to promote an increase in the housing stock within the city and promote housing choices by allowing and regulating accessory dwelling units (ADUs). B. Conflicting Regulations. If a regulation found in this section is in conflict with an applicable regulation in the base zoning district, overlay district, or provision of general applicability, the regulation in this chapter shall take precedence, with the following exceptions: 1. The regulations set forth in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; and 2. The Special Foothills Regulations set forth in Subsection 21A.24.010.P of this title. C. Owner Occupancy Required. The owner of the property, as defined in this section, shall reside on the property. For the purposes of this title, "owner occupant" shall mean the following: 1. An individual who is listed on a recorded deed as an owner of the property; 2. Any person who is related by blood,marriage, adoption to an individual who is listed on recorded deed as an owner of the property; or 3. An individual who is a trustor of a family trust who possesses legal ownership of the property. 4. Exceptions: a. Owner occupancy is not required for an ADU located on a property with a principal use as a duplex,multi-family dwelling,or non-residential land use.A single-family dwelling with an attached ADU does not constitute a duplex; b. The owner has a bona fide,temporary absence of three(3)years or less for activities such as military service,temporary job assignments, sabbaticals,or voluntary service (indefinite periods of absence from the dwelling shall not qualify for this exception); or c. The owner is placed in a hospital,nursing home,assisted living facility or other similar facility that provides regular medical care,excluding retirement living facilities or communities. D. Number of Allowed ADUs: A single ADU is allowed on a property where permitted in Chapter 21A.33 of this title. E. Location on property. An ADU is allowed in the following locations on a property as indicated below: 1. Internal ADUs shall be located within the buildable area of the property. 2. A detached ADU shall be allowed as indicated in the table below: Front yard Not permitted Corner Side yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is no closer to the corner side property line than the principal structure. If the property is less than 50' in width, the ADU may be closer to the corner side property line than the principal structure. Interior Side yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is located behind the rear fa ade of the principal building. Rear yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below. Buildable area Permitted Notes 1. The use of the term yard in this section shall be interpreted to mean a required yard as indicated in the underlying zoning district. 3. A detached ADU shall be placed at a minimum distance from property lines as indicated below: Rear property line 3' Side property line 3' Corner Side property line 20% of the lot width or 10', whichever is less Notes: I. Additions to an existing accessory building shall comply with the setbacks in this table. This includes additions that add a second story. 2. An existing accessory building that is being converted to an ADU may maintain the existing setbacks of the accessory building. If a conversion includes an expansion (including adding a second story)the expansion shall comply with all applicable setback requirements in this table and in Subsection 2 1 A.40.200.F. F. ADU Building Height: 1. The maximum building height for a detached ADU is 17 feet, subject to the following exceptions: a. Height may be increased up to 24 feet for a pitched roof or 20 feet for a flat roof provided the side and rear yard setbacks are increased one foot for each additional foot in building height above 17 feet.The setback does not need to be increased above the minimum indicated in Section E on the side of an ADU that abuts an alley or on the side of an ADU that abuts a property that is in a zoning district other than those listed in Chapter 21A.24 of this title. b. Converting a legally existing accessory building is permitted when the existing accessory building exceeds the permitted height of this section. c. When an ADU is located fully within the buildable area of the property,the height of the ADU is allowed up to the permitted height of the principal building in the underlying zoning district. d. Solar panels attached to the roof of an ADU are permitted to exceed the maximum height of the structure up to four feet. 2. Building height for a detached ADU shall be measured in the same manner as the height for the principal building. 3. An internal ADU is subject to the same height requirements as the principal building. G. ADU Parking: 1. The number of parking stalls provided for the principal use shall not be reduced below the minimum identified in Chapter 21 A.44 of this Title in order to accommodate an ADU. One parking stall is required for the ADU, except as indicated below: a. The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off street parking requirement; b. The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking requirement for the principal use; c. The property is within a 1/4 mile radius of a public transit stop; or d. The property is within%2 mile of a city-designated bicycle lane or path. H. Regulation of Decks, Patios, and Outdoor Space for Detached ADUs: I. Decks more than 2 feet above the existing grade are prohibited unless the ADU is located within the buildable area of the lot in which case the deck shall be subject to the same regulations for decks that apply to the principal building. 2. Rooftop patios on a detached ADU are prohibited. 3. Patios are permitted. A patio may be covered with a roof provided the square footage of the roof is no larger than 120 square feet and the covered patio complies with the setbacks required of the ADU. A covered patio shall not count towards the maximum square footage requirement of the ADU,but does count towards the total building coverage of the lot. 4. Balconies on ADUs: a balcony is permitted on a building containing an ADU provided the balcony does not extend into a required ADU setback and extends no further than 5 feet from an exterior wall of the ADU.Balconies shall not contain HVAC equipment nor be used as storage areas. 5. Internal ADUs shall be subject to the same standards for decks,patios,and other encroachments that apply to the principal building and use. I. ADUs located along a public alley. A detached ADU that is located within 15 feet of a public alley shall include the following: 1. An exterior light shall be located on the exterior wall of the ADU to illuminate portions of the alley adjacent to the ADU. The lighting fixture shall be shielded,oriented and designed to direct light down and avoid light pollution onto adjacent properties. All uplighting is prohibited. 2. A 4' wide path from the alley to the entrance of the ADU shall be provided. If there is a fence between the ADU and the alley,a gate shall be provided,and the path shall lead to the gate.If the ADU is located within 15 feet of two or more public alleys,this requirement shall only apply to one of the alleys. 3. An ADU located on an alley that exists on the recorded plat maps or Atlas Plats of the city but has not been used for vehicular access or is otherwise blocked by encroachments such as fences or vegetation are exempt from this requirement. J. ADU Gross Floor Area: 1. Detached ADU.None may exceed 1,000 square feet in gross floor area. 2. Internal ADU. There is no maximum gross floor area provided the building complies with all applicable standards in the underlying zoning district. 3. Gross floor area for a detached ADU shall be calculated as follows: a. When the building includes other allowed accessory uses,only the square footage dedicated to the ADU shall be counted. b. When the ADU is on a second level, stairs and required landings providing access to the ADU shall not be counted. c. Loft space with a ceiling height lower than 7 feet within an ADU shall not be counted towards the total square footage of the ADU. d. Basements shall not count towards the maximum gross floor area of the ADU, so long as: i. The basement is only used for storage or a use permitted by section 21A.40.040.E of this chapter; and ii. There is no internal circulation between the ADU and the basement. K. Second Story Windows. Windows on the second story of a detached ADU are prohibited on an exterior wall that is adjacent to a side or rear property line unless: 1. The window is a clerestory window where the bottom of the window is at least 6 feet above the finished floor of the second story; 2. The window is on a wall that faces an elevation of the principal building; 3. The window faces and is at least 10 feet from a side or rear property line; 4. The exterior wall is adjacent to an alley; or 5. The window faces a side or rear property line that is adjacent to a property in a zoning district that permits commercial uses or a property that contains a nonresidential use. L. Maximum Building Coverage. Accessory dwelling units are subject to the maximum building and yard coverage requirements of the applicable zoning and overlay districts. M. Building Permit Required. A building permit is required to establish any ADU in the city. All ADUs are required to comply with all adopted applicable codes including but not limited to building, fire, and public utilities. N. Administrative Regulations: the following administrative regulations are intended to provide direction on applying and interpreting the regulations of this chapter. 1. There is no minimum lot size required for an ADU. 2. An ADU does not count towards the density allowed in the underlying zoning district. 3. ADUs that have been approved prior to (date of adoption), as part of a conditional use are considered legal conforming uses and may be modified if the modification complies with the requirements of this section and any other applicable standard of this title. O. Zoning Certificate and Good Landlord Program: I. A certificate of occupancy for the ADU shall not be issued until a zoning certificate is issued.A zoning certificate may be issued at the same time as the certificate of occupancy. If a certificate of occupancy is not required,the zoning certificate shall be issued prior to the ADU being occupied. 2. If a business license is required for the rental of the ADU,the owner shall be enrolled in the landlord/tenant initiative program as defined in Title 5,`Business Taxes,Licenses And Regulations",of this code prior to issuing a zoning certificate. P. Restrictive Covenant: An ADU that is required to be owner occupied shall have a restrictive covenant filed against the property on which the ADU is located,which restrictive covenant shall include the following information: I. A description of the primary dwelling and the ADU,including whether the ADU is within the principal structure or a detached structure,the square footage of both the primary dwelling and the ADU,and how off-street parking is allocated between the primary dwelling and the ADU. 2. A statement that the ADU may only be used and occupied in accordance with the applicable regulations adopted in the Salt Lake City Code. 3. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office against the subject property. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be provided to the planning division and attached to the building permit record prior to final inspection of the ADU. If no final inspection is required,the copy of the recorded covenant shall be provided prior to occupying the ADU. Q. Use Regulations: 1. An ADU shall not be rented as a short term rental as defined in Section 21.A.62.040. 2. An ADU may include any home occupation authorized by this title. 3. An ADU may be converted to any other accessory use that is allowed in the zoning district. 4. An ADU cannot be converted to another principal use. SECTION 9.Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.60.020. That Section 21 A.60.020 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: List of Terms: List of Defined Terms)shall be and hereby is amended to add the following terms in the list of defined terms to be inserted into that list in alphabetical order: Atlas, 5-acre, and 10-acre plats. Balcony. Bike lane. Bike path. Deck. Dwelling, accessory unit(internal). Footprint. Non-residential use. Porch. Rooftop patio. Short term rental. Transit route. Uplighting. SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section 2 IA.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. Amending the definition of"DWELLING,ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU)." That the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU)" shall be amended to read as follows: DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU): A type of accessory use that includes a residential unit located on the same lot as a separate principal use, either within the principal structure or within a separate accessory structure. The accessory dwelling unit shall be a complete housekeeping unit with a shared or separate entrance, and separate kitchen, sleeping area, closet space, and bathroom facilities. b. Amending the definition of`BUILDING COVERAGE." That the definition of "BUILDING COVERAGE" shall be amended to read as follows: BUILDING COVERAGE: That percentage of the lot covered by principal or accessory buildings, including cantilevered portions of the building. c. Adding the definition of"ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS." That the definition of"ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS: a map depicting the subdivisions of land within the City. These plats are a scheme of how the City was originally laid out. The City started with plats A through L, Salt Lake City Survey. As the City expanded its boundaries, 5 acre and 10 acre Big Field Survey Plats were added and then the numbered plats I through 76. They show information about streets,public right of ways and, some private right of ways. d. Adding the definition of"BALCONY." That the definition of"BALCONY"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: BALCONY: An elevated floor space projecting beyond the exterior walls of a building that is not supported on the ground by posts, columns, or similar supporting structural elements. A balcony shall not be used as a means for entry into a building. e. Adding the definition of`BIKE LANE." That the definition of`BIKE LANE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: BIKE LANE: a division of a road for use by cyclists marked off with painted lines or other means. £ Adding the definition of"BIKE PATH." That the definition of"BIKE PATH"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: BIKE PATH: a path or road for bicycles and not motor vehicles. May include paths that also allow pedestrian or equestrian access. g. Adding the definition of"DECK." That the definition of"DECK"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: DECK: A platform sitting above finished grade and supported on the ground. h. Adding the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED)." That the definition of"DWELLING,ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED)"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED): An accessory dwelling unit located wholly within a structure that is accessory to the principal use and buildings on a lot or parcel. i. Adding the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL)." That the definition of"DWELLING,ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL)"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL): An accessory dwelling unit created: 1. within a primary building; and 2. for the purpose of offering a long-term rental of 30 consecutive days or longer. j. Adding the definition of"FOOTPRINT." That the definition of"FOOTPRINT"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: FOOTPRINT: The measurement of lot area covered by a building, including cantilevered portions of the building. k. Adding the definition of"NON-RESIDENTIAL USE." That the definition of"NON- RESIDENTIAL USE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: NON-RESIDENTIAL USE: lands, buildings or structures or portions thereof used or designed or intended for uses other than a residential use, including, but not limited to, commercial, industrial and institutional uses. 1. Adding the definition of"PORCH." That the definition of"PORCH"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: PORCH: An unenclosed structure attached to a building, covered by a separate roof, and providing access to an entrance to a building. Similar structures providing access to an entrance other than the primary entrance shall be considered a covered deck when located on a platform that is more than two feet(2') above finished grade. in. Adding the definition of"ROOFTOP PATIO." That the definition of"ROOFTOP PATIO"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: ROOFTOP PATIO: A portion of a flat roof that is dedicated to occupiable space, or a deck sitting atop a roof. n. Adding the definition of"SHORT TERM RENTAL." That the definition of"SHORT TERM RENTAL"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: SHORT TERM RENTAL: The use of a dwelling unit or units that are offered for rent or lease for a period less than 30 days. o. Adding the definition of"TRANSIT ROUTE." That the definition of"TRANSIT ROUTE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: TRANSIT ROUTE: a route over which a public transit vehicle travels and that is specifically labeled or numbered for the purpose of picking up and dropping off passengers at regularly scheduled stops and intervals. p. Adding the definition of"UPLIGHTING." That the definition of"UPLIGHTING"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: UPLIGHTING: Lights that have been designed to throw illumination upward. SECTION 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney's Office , Bill No. of 2023. Date:M a r,0 15 23_ Published: By: Pa 1 C. ielso Senior City Attorney Ordinance amending ADU regulations(final) LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2023 3 4 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 2 1 A of the 5 Salt Lake City Code pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations) 6 7 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21 A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 8 to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475 pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations. 9 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission("Planning Commission") held a 10 public hearing on September 14, 2022 to consider a petition submitted by the Planning 11 Commission(Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475) to amend various sections of Title 2 1 A of the 12 Salt Lake City Code pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations; and 13 WHEREAS, at its September 14, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor 14 of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council") on said 15 petition; and 16 WHEREAS, the City Council intends to revisit the issue of owner occupancy 17 requirements in three years; and 18 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 19 adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. 20 NOW, THEREFORE,be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 21 22 SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That Section 23 2 IA.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 24 Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the use 25 category"Dwelling, accessory unit" in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential 26 Districts, which use category shall read and appear in that table as follows: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 27 Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District FR-1/ FR-2/ FR-3/ R-1/ R-1/ R-1/ SR-1 SR-2 SR-3 R-2 RMF-30 MF-35 RMF-45 RMF-75 RB R-MU-35 R-MU-45 R-MU RO 43,560 21,780 12,000 12,000 7,000 5,000 Dwelling, C-P C-P C—P C-P C-P C-P P P P P P P P P P P P P accessory unit 28 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 29 SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 30 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 31 Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use 32 subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 33 Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in 34 alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District CN CB CSl CC CSHBDI CG SNB Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P P P P 35 36 SECTION 3. Amendiniz the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.035. That Section 37 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 38 Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a 39 new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 40 Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that 41 table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Dwelling: Accessory P P P P P P P P unit 42 43 SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 44 21 A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 45 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 46 subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 47 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts,which use category shall be inserted into that table in 48 alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P 49 50 SECTION 5. Amendiniz the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.060. That Section 51 2 IA.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 52 Conditional Uses in the Gateway District) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use 53 subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 54 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts,which use category shall be inserted into that table in 55 alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: 56 Use G-MU Dwelling: Accessory unit P 57 58 SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That Section 59 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 60 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new 61 use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 62 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in 63 alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: 64 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Permitted Uses By District Use FB- FB-UN2 FB-SC FB-SE UN1 Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P 65 66 SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.050.B.2. That 67 Subsection 21A.40.050.B.2 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and 68 Structures: General Yard, Bulk and Height Limitations) shall be and hereby is amended to read as 69 follows: 70 2. Building Coverage: 71 72 a. In the FR,R-1,R-2 and SR residential districts the m.,x;,,-1-1 b,,;',iag eeve age of all 73 maximum footprint of any accessory building, '" ''^n ti^3p houses,gfee hour and 74 ^'a --Mm^s; w4" growing rn^a an&or-plats, shall not exceed fifty 75 percent(50%)of the building footprint of the principal structure up to a maximum af 76 77 (1,000)s o:of f r., two family dwell . 78 79 80 . except as follows: 81 82 (1) Notwithstanding the size of the footprint of the principal building,at least 480 square 83 feet of accessory buildingcge shall be allowed subject to the compliance with all 84 other requirements in Section 21A.40.050. 85 (2) Accessory buildings constructed within the buildable area that are located between the 86 rear facade of the principal building and the rear yard setback may exceed 720 square 87 feet provided the building is located entirely within the buildable area and the property 88 complies with the maximum buildingcoverage overage requirements of the underlyingzg 89 district. 90 The buildingcoverage overage for a detached accessory dwelling unit shall be subject to the 91 standards in 21A.40.200,regardless of the buildingcoverage overage requirement in this 92 section. 93 (4) An accessory building that contains an accessory dwelling unit on the second level 94 may exceed the maximum coverage up to the footprint of the accessory dwelling unit. 95 96 b. The combined coverage for all hoop houses,greenhouses,and cold frames shall not 97 exceed thirty five percent(35%)of the building footprint of the principal structure. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 98 SECTION 8. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.40.200. That Section 99 21A.40.200 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Accessory Uses,Buildings and Structures: Accessory 100 Dwelling Units) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 101 21A.40.200: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: 102 103 A n„ a ct.,to,,,o„t; The, o „l.,te-, f th;s o ., 104 105 1. Crvate-avx housing uffl-its; i 1-P--.respecting the appe-afaneVe. and- se-al-e-, of single f4mily 106 vim; lo„t; ,l development'. 107 2. nr v;ao ,,;"os ; sidel t;.,l distr;"ts; 108 , 109 A,,,h,l;o l energy ,,,,tailfie l o ;St;,,,. St,.,,"t We-S. 110 , and- ill f,v,;l;ea 1400ki g S„,.,ll",-h0HSeh jdS; 112 , and fhmilioq wit 113 gr-e ,,,, "h;ldfe t „ thoir h,mes and „ ghb e-h, eds and obtain ext 114 ifloome e ,ity sh p and So o . 115 6. i2,-0.,,lo4 tho f��� l,hlo h,,,,s;ag th,e —1 .,,t 11 !'tit„• 116 , an 117 ; 118 9. Support t-r—ansit off-ifeented development And--veedduveee auto usage b3 deftsi 119 transit; And 120 O c,,,-.,-oft the o viability of histe pe Ries andthe City's histo 121 ,,ro�e,„�+; ,,, goals ham. all,,, ing a , dwellings i histo s+,-,,,.r rys 122 123 B.3wner Os r- of this title, "„� » shall mean the e sir s��«-ewn�s 124 following: 125 126 n,, wh., ;g- l;st".l o l"l a""a ofth"p pfft,,. 127 , adoption to an individual who is listed 128 0 ,.,.a",l aova , a off the ,. reFt y; Of 129 3. An individual who is a trustor-of a family tmst who possesses legal Ownership of t 130 PFOPOAY. 131 132 , 133 " , of this title and subject to compliance with the applicable pr-ovisi 134 of this 135 ,but no 136 limited to the following,v,oth. ds- 137 138 1. G-e-n-ve-vt-ing existing living area within a single family ",oifing as an to MI 139 , or-within a single family ",elling oreated as new LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 141 , as an additio-la to an existin 143 144 . 145 146 1.e�em�e"ir-ements lie-al}1e. Afl-neeesser-y Dwelling Units 147 148 a. One no,.hot: City m pen nit o aeoe-ssor-y dwelling unit_for e—ArCh i t-#t,,,t. 149 t-aim s a s i g 1 o f,Y,;1.. &,oi11,11 150 Not n T r„;t 0f DPCHsit y.- Aeeesrsor-y dwe-11i Rg v r,A:R i�z€,vez =c1 A 151 152 pr-e 153 Co. 01ATiae-r-shi-Pr- An___aeeP_-.ssE)t-y dwelling unit shall not be, sold sepafately or-subdivided 154 fr-ofn th ,. i i. i '. e ling unit lot, »loss oompliant with sub-d yis 155 regulations. 156 d. Ownp-mr-Oeeupaney: The r;ty shall eFlmit ffin aeeessory-dwellng unitwhex 157 158 &,elii , it Owner-oeoupane"hallnot i..a ro rva whew. 159 160 (1) TL,a ^ craas-a bona fide, tenpvr-ufy aah-senee off-thee (3) years or-less fo 161 , 162 lu-pA M.se e (indefinite pe ass ofabsenee from the dive lifig shall163 qualify for-this exeeptiea)-;--� 164 (' The is plaeed� e tal, nursing home, assisted living aeilit�, Or 165 , 167 168 169 &,oiling unit may net-exeeed the number allowed for-a "family" i 170 Jeetion 21 A.62 040, «De€initiens-Of Tooms", of this title 171 f-. Home Occupations: Home occepations may be conducted in an accessofy 172 &,oiiing unit a v eVeti fl 21 n 36 n-n of this title 173 g. nay-king: An accessory dwelling nit shallr-e o Humforte on site 174 , 175 between the property line with an adjacent stfeet and a legally located off stfee 176 177 1 use is complied NN it-11- has a space that is at least 178 t zee yfeet(20') deepbyeight feet 82) wide. The par-king-requirement 179 180 181 (1) Legally located on stfeet par-king is available along the stfeet frontage of the 182 subjeet r pet4y; of 183 184 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 185 -2. Admiti onal Requir-emeats For-Aeeesser-y Dwelling Units Located Within A Single 186 187 shall eemply with the following star aa,-as, 188 189 , 190 191 ,,yer4 ), a;l;t,-;,.t 11,,Io1414 ,,,,,a;f;epd by the u;st r;,. -missio-in 192 v,-t., i,,e to . „t-hi-n ,,,, a u;st Over-lay Dist,.-;et, 193 194 Per-eent{59°%the gross s"ar-o footage of the single family dwell e- 195 square- footage of an attaehed garage- shallm-m-At hp i:mv-,bided in the gross square 196 197 r,,,r.it ble spaee be-low the n 198 199 . 200 201 (1) An existing ontr-anev to oh-p- single family dwelling; 202 , the ent+anc-e 203 sh.,ii he--, sot�,, vffi-in-im-um- f t.ma„ty foot(20') f:-,,,,-, the ffe t building 204 €ate 205 207 208 entry to the building and are e e „t fir offl-ssub-seetie 24.0'�Side 209 fAi-y „idings" of this title. 210 r ocate'd A-H UheFeffir-far-made, 211 (6) r ,,c tv,a ; side. ar- p i o,l the, s;,ao y r- ; at least o gl t foot (9') ; 212 lWid-Uh. Stai-r-s loading to-Intl-ewe a tape ttet-A te eRe�c�cci 213 „t the silo yard. 214 215 3. Additional Requirements For-An Accessory Dwelling Unit Located in A Detached 216 217 building oF as an addition to an exist' g y building shall comply with the 218 , 219 by the Hist, Fic Landmark ark Commission for a property locate-.-A ; „ u Historic 221 222 l ems;-emefAs: Shall cemply withal! e-able general yar-d bulk 223 height limitations fo�d in section 21A.40.050 of this chapter and any accessory 224 225 over-lay zoning district unless other-wise regulated by this section. An accesso 226 &Telling Unit loeated in-an-addition-al -aervesswy building may be eenst+ueted an 227 shall not count towards the maximum square footage of all accessory buildings as 228 Jtatod i-n- su b-s eEtioH 2 1 A.40 050u2 ofthi ss e�apten The-aee e s seFY bui kli*g 229 eontaining an accessofy dwelling unit shall not have a footpr-int that is greater- 230 ° , LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 231 oaxeved- six hu-n-d—r-e-A fifty (650) square feet. An aceessefy building th-at 0-2,A-4-4-t--P1 232 aeoesser-y dwelling unit and any other-pofmittead aeoeessofy use shall Gomply wi 233 Al 6,,,;1d* r-eqtliFOMefl+14 ill14o,.t;,,,, 2)i A.A.n ncn of this ,captor 234 1-Wiffig-i VOfag all ceMply With th;'",;'a;^^ri,^ ii eover-a 235 a or+� ftb,o„„de-r-lying zoning distr-ietor- ri;,.able e,-iay 236 a;Str; t �,�.; �.o�,ar; ffl-A-F-P--, aRtr;,.tiv-e 237 238 lo-eate—d b-o-APIA,eavol-p-the--,fe—ar of the single family dwelling and the r-ear-pr-ope-r-t 239 i;,,o .,r,a be subjeet t the ii ,,z,;,,n sotbaek requirements: 240 241 ' 242 iA,.,toa An tha same- ol and any single y,,;l., awoll;f . on an a; o„t 243 pfoper-ty. 244 (2) Side and r-ear-yar-d- sput-b-plEINE's.. 245 246 (A)Now Aeeessor-y Buildings: Shall lo-e-ate f fi ,,, eet+41) 247 f of S;ao A a lAt 248 (B) Additioans To Existing Ascesrsor-y Buildings- The, -ad-dition shall be 249 to-eate-m-1 a of four-feet(4') froman), s;,ao r rear,let linen 250 existing a building ; eludes ., addition, allf r portions of the 251 252 253 be, ltemve t rly with the plie-ah-le so,.t;,,. s of the .,dopto,a F;ro r-44fje- 254 of the- 255 (rc)Second Stoi=y Additions-rseeond sloiy `dd-ition-to existing aeoessorr-y 256 bUil ifig ; et:M tteE r „ava ISa ,.a story aa;t;, n hng n minimilm 257 �ot�,, v o fte— feet (i 0') fiv o- s;,ao re-A ,iine andthe, s ,,,a 258 st,.M. .,aa;tio ...lies with allplioa-ble ro „l.,tions aeoesso 259 dwelling units located on a second for of a detaekea accessory building. ing 260 Tf tl,v s;ao o- o , I t I;„v ; aElj eo t to a a11e , th,o s ea,tb-,,,.v,n, ,be 261 ..o,auce to f„r feet(n') 262 263 a Building Height: 264 265 (1) The maximum height of an accessory building contai S-s� 266 267 pfopei4y exceed seventeen feet(,7') i height, whichever-is less 268 269 Exception: if the single family dwelling on the property is over-seventeen 270 ('''nneight, an aeeessor-y building centaiiiifig-an aeoesse =elling=��ii 271 may be equal t the height of the single family dwelling„r t ., maximum 272 building height ftwenty four feet (24') foF an e building ing with 273 pitchedroof or-twenty feet (20') for a accessory building w„tti flat r .� 274 PFON410a thO aGO a SS Off t,,,;ia;,,n ; of i -Ar-Oy 0ften feet (i 0') fFOM , 275 SidC OF Fear operty l setback for additional height may be reduced to 276 four-feet(n>) if the side- A- o r i t i;fio ; .,djaeo,,t to an alley LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 277 (2) Accessory building ing height shall be measured t the ridge of the r 278 buildings with a p4ohed roof and t the top f the roof line fir flat roof-. 279 280 e. Size Requirements: An accessory building that contains an aeeessofy-dwelliong 281 unit shall be suQjeet to the building coverage-requirements far amosserybOlding 282 found section 21 n nn 50 f tb„s chapter-. in no instance- shall 283 ,wain,,untexceed a gross floor-area f six hundred f;ft„ (650 s o l of 284 fl. Entrance Locations: The enhance to an aems,q,dwelling unit in ma acco,sym 285 building shall be 100amodd- 286 287 ,public street or-facing the r-ear-faeado of the single family 288 (NoUing o the same port„ 289 (2) Facing ear property linered the ent-r-anee is l4cat 290 minimuna ofto„ Wet(10') ffom the side or v pfopeFty,ufo 291 (3) Exterior- stairs leading to an entrance shall be located . . *f-ton4eet 292 (1 01 from ., side o v property line unless the applicable 293 propep,line is adjacent to an alley in which case the minimum setbaek 294 accessory building applies to the stai 295 296 g RegWrements For Windows: VAndows on an accessory building containing �� 297 accessory dwelling unit shall eemply:,A,ith the following standards: 298 299 (1) Windows shall be no larger ban necessary to comply with the,„ 300 Building Code requirementsfir egress where required. Skylights, clerestefy 301 windows, or-obscured glazing shall be used when facing a s to 302 property line tom. comply with minimum Building ing rode requirements 303 and light o building lr ing elevations tb,.,t ., o „;tb„„ to,, As (1 01 of a side or F 304 property line, .,lass the side o a propert,, line ; adjacent to ., .,lley. 305 (2) Except ., required; subsection r. E3g(1) of this section, windows shall 306 maintain a similar-dimension and design as the windows f6i 307 „r. ;ipal structures-. 308 (3) W?ndow openings located on the ground t400r-within an existing accessory 309 b u l,l ng „nether „f,,Y,i —or non conforming with window ro „l.,t;,.,,� ; 310 this ,haptor, m -o retained-if compliant,with ;tb, Building ing andFire r; ao� 311 Existing windows ows 1,,c t a second level within ., existing acces-sory 312 building shall be brought into compliance with 313 314 k..—Balconies And Docks: Balcenies and decks shall be designed-afollows: 315 316 (1) Shali not exeood eighty (80) square lie in size when loeated above the-ground 317 level of the building; lrling; 318 (2) Shall ecarted a minimum of ten feet (10') from ., side ,. re<.rad-lot-lime 319 unless the applicable side o rear yard lot line ; adjacent to a alley; 320 (3Rooftop decks are p-rohibite4. 321 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 322 F. Re istfation PFeoess; PFopoi:ly owner-s Seeking to establish an accessol=y dwelling unit 323 shall eemply with the f ii,,.. ifig. 324 325 1. n,.,,.,iie t;a . 326 327 328 21A.09 f this title. 329 330 (i) Ge-r-ti-fie- te. of n,.,.upa- oy; n f,,,.,.upa- oy f r tt,o APT-1 ,,,,t 331 i,o ; s 44 PC 41„t;i a z 0 H i a g e,o,.t;�;,..,ta ; va n ee f t i fie,te m a ,be 332 o,a At tl,o '4 o timp as the certificate f,,,.,.,,raney if a,.o,.t;f;eato of 333 not ro r-e the zoning ee-r-ti fie,te sh-all by issued prior-t t� 334 n D r ,. ie 335 (2) a r iomrd Program: if-A ir-o'd fArthe—, � Af 336 either tl,o 4 DI I Ar tl,o q &4, ,,, i�,a.z,oii;,,n the sh-aii be o , ,»o a ; 337 tah-e�a teRam"a t tjV egr-.�-A4e title5, sxeS, 338 hie ,in-sems Aad Regulations", of thisGode-pr-ioF t eHifig-00ftifiGatO. 339 340 b. Building Pe-Emit; Apply for-a:-P-t building r ,-m t for-the propose 341aeoesser-y dwelling unit o .,,.moss f ri,ati,,,a f 342 0, pr-ppf-Of 011vl4pr-Oe-'empancy; An applioation for- pin aeeessoty dwelling unit shall 343 344 345 ce aflc�tth sub-,;eetien B, "Owner-9sc ant", of thisseetion.. 346 347 349 ' 350 . 351 352 abandoned or Fevoked. 353 354 occupancy or be occupied until the property owner-completes the r-egistr-a ion pfeeess 355 „ti;,,oa ;n Ohis secret; r Regist,..,t; r ; t r-equi-red if the n DU is oeoupied-by 356 relatives f the p e-ty 357 358 G. Abandonment: if a property owner is unable of!unwilling to fulfill the requirements of 359 this seetion, 360 . 361 362 , address of each unit for which an applioation 3A,aS 363 , and a map 364 showing approved accessory dwelling units. The repoFt shall be tfansmitted to the City 366 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 367 A. Purpose: the re ug latorypurpose of this section is to promote an increase in the housing 368 stock within the ci . and promote housing choices by allowingand regulating accessory 369 dwellingunits nits (ADUs). 370 371 B. Conflicting Regulations. If a regulation found in this section is in conflict with an 372 applicable regulation in the base zoning district, overlay district, or provision of enteral 373 applicability, the regulation in this chapter shall take precedence, with the following 374 exceptions: 375 376 1. The regulations set forth in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; and 377 2. The Special Foothills Regulations set forth in Subsection 21A.24.010.P of this title. 378 C. Owner Occupancy Required. The owner of the property, as defined in this section, shall 379 reside on the property. For the purposes of this title, "owner occupant" shall mean the 380 following: 381 382 1. An individual who is listed on a recorded deed as an owner of the property; 383 2. AU person who is related by blood,marriage,adoption to an individual who is listed on 384 recorded deed as an owner of the property; or 385 3. An individual who is a trustor of a family trust who possesses legal ownership of the 386 roe . 387 4. Exceptions: 388 389 a. Owner occupancy is not required for an ADU located on a property with a principal 390 use as a duplex,multi-family dwelling,or non-residential land use.A single-family 391 dwelling with an attached ADU does not constitute a duplex; 392 b. The owner has a bona fide,temporary absence of three(3)years or less for activities 393 such as military service,tempoM job assia=ents, sabbaticals,or voluntary service 394 (indefinite periods of absence from the dwelling shall not qualify for this exception 395 or 396 c. The owner is placed in a hospital,nursing home,assisted livingf acility or other 397 similar facility that provides regular medical care,excluding retirement living facilities 398 or communities. 399 D. Number of Allowed ADUs: A single ADU is allowed on a property where permitted in 400 Chapter 21A.33 of this title. 401 402 E. Location on property. An ADU is allowed in the following locations on a grope . as 403 indicated below: 404 405 1. Internal ADUs shall be located within the buildable area of the property. 406 2. A detached ADU shall be allowed as indicated in the table below: 407 408 409 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Front yard Notpermitted' Corner Side yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is no closer to the corner side property line than the principal structure. If the property is less than 50' in width, the ADU may be closer to the corner side property line than the principal structure. Interior Sided Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is located behind the rear fa ade of the principal building. Rearms Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below. Buildable area Permitted Notes 1. The use of the term yard in this section shall be interpreted to mean a required indicated in the underlying zonin district. 410 411 3. A detached ADU shall be placed at a minimum distance from property lines as indicated 412 below: Rear grope _ line 3' Side ro ert line 3' Corner Side propeM line 20% of the lot width or 10', whichever is less Notes: 1. Additions to an existing accessory building shall comply with the setbacks in this table. This includes additions that add a second story. 2. An existing accessory building that is being converted to an ADU may maintain the existing setbacks of the accessory building. If a conversion includes an expansion (includingadding dding a second story)the expansion shall comply with all applicable setback requirements in this table and in Subsection 21A.40.200.F. 413 414 415 F. ADU Building Height: 416 417 1. The maximum building height for a detached ADU is 17 feet, subject to the followin 418 exceptions: 419 420 a. Height may be increased up to 24 feet for a pitched roof or 20 feet for a flat roof 421 provided the side and rear yard setbacks are increased one foot for each additional foot 422 in building height above 17 feet. The setback does not need to be increased above the 423 minimum indicated in Section E on the side of an ADU that abuts an alley or on the 424 side of an ADU that abuts a property that is in a zoning district other than those listed 425 in Chapter 21A.24 of this title. 426 b. Converting a legally existing accessory building is permitted when the existing 427 accessory building exceeds the permitted height of this section. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 428 c. When an ADU is located fully within the buildable area of the property,the height of 429 the ADU is allowed up to the permitted height of the principal buildingin n the 430 underlyin zoning oning district. 431 d. Solar panels attached to the roof of an ADU are permitted to exceed the maximum 432 height of the structure up to four feet. 433 434 2. Building height for a detached ADU shall be measured in the same manner as the height 435 for the principal building. 436 3. An internal ADU is subject to the same height requirements as the principal building. 437 G. ADU Parking: 438 439 1. The number of parkin stalls talls provided for the principal use shall not be reduced below the 440 minimum identified in Chapter 21A.44 of this Title in order to accommodate an ADU. 441 One parking stall is required for the ADU,except as indicated below: 442 443 a. The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off street parking requirement; 444 b. The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking 445 requirement for the principal use; 446 c. The property is within a 1A mile radius of a public transit stop;or 447 d. The property is within%2 mile of a city-designated bicycle lane or path. 448 H. Regulation of Decks, Patios, and Outdoor Space for Detached ADUs: 449 450 1. Decks more than 2 feet above the existing grade are prohibited unless the ADU is located 451 within the buildable area of the lot in which case the deck shall be subject to the same 452 regulations for decks that apply to the principal building. 453 2. Rooftop patios on a detached ADU are prohibited. 454 3. Patios are permitted. A patio may be covered with a roof provided the square footage of 455 the roof is no larger than 120 square feet and the covered patio complies with the setbacks 456 required of the ADU. A covered patio shall not count towards the maximum square 457 footage requirement of the ADU,but does count towards the total buildingcoverage overa eg of the 458 lot. 459 4. Balconies on ADUs: a balcony is permitted on a building containing an ADU provided 460 the balcony does not extend into a required ADU setback and extends no further than 5 461 feet from an exterior wall of the ADU. Balconies shall not contain HVAC equipment nor 462 be used as storage areas. 463 5. Internal ADUs shall be subject to the same standards for decks,patios,and other 464 encroachments that apply to the principal building and use. 465 I. ADUs located along a public alley. A detached ADU that is located within 15 feet of a 466 _public alley shall include the following: 467 468 1. An exterior light shall be located on the exterior wall of the ADU to illuminate portions of 469 the alley djacent to the ADU. The lighting fixture shall be shielded, oriented and LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 470 designed to direct light down and avoid light pollution onto adjacent properties. All 471 upli_ ting is prohibited. 472 2. A 4' wide path from the alley to the entrance of the ADU shall be provided. If there is a 473 fence between the ADU and the alley,a gate shall be provided, and the path shall lead to 474 the gate. If the ADU is located within 15 feet of two or more public alleys,this 475 requirement shall only pply to one of the alley 476 3. An ADU located on an alley that exists on the recorded plat maps or Atlas Plats of the city 477 but has not been used for vehicular access or is otherwise blocked by encroachments such 478 as fences or vegetation are exempt from this requirement. 479 480 J. ADU Gross Floor Area: 481 482 1. Detached ADU.None may exceed 1,000 square feet in gross floor area. 483 2. Internal ADU. There is no maximum gross floor area provided the building complies with 484 all applicable standards in the underlyin zoning oning district. 485 3. Gross floor area for a detached ADU shall be calculated as follows: 486 487 a. When the building includes other allowed accessory uses,onl_ the footage 488 dedicated to the ADU shall be counted. 489 b. When the ADU is on a second level, stairs and required landings providing access to 490 the ADU shall not be counted. 491 c. Loft space with a ceiling height lower than 7 feet within an ADU shall not be counted 492 towards the total square footage of the ADU. 493 d. Basements shall not count towards the maximum gross floor area of the ADU, so long 494 as: 495 496 i. The basement is only used for storage or a use permitted by section 21A.40.040.E 497 of this chapter; and 498 ii. There is no internal circulation between the ADU and the basement. 499 K. Second Story Windows. Windows on the second story of a detached ADU are prohibited 500 on an exterior wall that is adjacent to a side or rear property line unless: 501 502 1. The window is a clerestory window where the bottom of the window is at least 6 feet 503 above the finished floor of the second story; 504 2. The window is on a wall that faces an elevation of the principal building; 505 3. The window faces and is at least 10 feet from a side or rear property line; 506 4. The exterior wall is adjacent to an alley; or 507 5. The window faces a side or rear property line that is adjacent to a properly in a zoning 508 district that permits commercial uses or a property that contains a nonresidential use. 509 L. Maximum Building Coverage. Accessory dwelling units are subject to the maximum 510 building and yard coverage requirements of the applicable zoning and overlay districts. 511 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 512 M. Building Permit Required. A building_permit is required to establish any ADU in the 513 city. All ADUs are required to comply with all adopted applicable codes including but 514 not limited to building, fire, and public utilities. 515 516 N. Administrative Regulations: the followiniz administrative regulations are intended to 517 provide direction on applying and interpretin the he regulations of this chapter. 518 519 1. There is no minimum lot size required for an ADU. 520 2. An ADU does not count towards the density allowed in the underlyingzoning oning district. 521 3. ADUs that have been approved prior to (date ofadoption), as part of a conditional use are 522 considered legal conforming uses and may be modified if the modification complies with 523 the requirements of this section and any other applicable standard of this title. 524 O. Zoniniz Certificate and Good Landlord Program: 525 526 1. A certificate of occupancy for the ADU shall not be issued until a zoning certificate is 527 issued.A zoning certificate may be issued at the same time as the certificate of occupanc. 528 If a certificate of occupancy is not required,the zoning certificate shall be issued prior to 529 the ADU being occupied. 530 2. If a business license is required for the rental of the ADU,the owner shall be enrolled in 531 the landlord/tenant initiative program as defined in Title 5,"Business Taxes,Licenses And 532 Regulations",of this code prior to issuing a zoning certificate. 533 P. Restrictive Covenant: An ADU that is required to be owner occupied shall have a 534 restrictive covenant filed against the property on which the ADU is located, which 535 restrictive covenant shall include the following information: 536 537 1. A description of the primary dwelling and the ADU, including whether the ADU is within 538 the principal structure or a detached structure,the square footage of both the primary 539 dwelliniz and the ADU,and how off-street parking is allocated between the primm 540 dwelliniz and the ADU. 541 2. A statement that the ADU may only be used and occupied in accordance with the 542 applicable regulations adopted in the Salt Lake Ci . Code. 543 3. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office 544 against the subject property. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be provided to the 545 planning division and attached to the building permit record prior to final inspection of the 546 ADU. If no fmal inspection is required,the copy of the recorded covenant shall be 547 provided prior to occupying the ADU. 548 Q. Use Regulations: 549 550 1. An ADU shall not be rented as a short term rental as defined in Section 21.A.62.040. 551 2. An ADU may include any home occupation authorized by this title. 552 3. An ADU may be converted to any other accessory use that is allowed in the zoning 553 district. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 554 4. An ADU cannot be converted to another principal use. 555 556 SECTION 9.Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.60.020. That Section 557 2 IA.60.020 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: List of Terms: List of Defined Terms)shall be and 558 hereby is amended to add the following terms in the list of defined terms to be inserted into that list in 559 alphabetical order: 560 Atlas, 5-acre, and 10-acre plats. 561 Balcony. 562 Bike lane. 563 Bike path. 564 Deck. 565 Dwelling, accessory unit(internal). 566 Foolprint. 567 Non-residential use. 568 Porch. 569 Rooftop patio. 570 Short term rental. 571 Transit route. 572 Uplighting. 573 574 SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section 575 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms), shall be and 576 hereby is amended as follows: 577 a. Amending the definition of"DWELLING,ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU)." That the 578 definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU)" shall be amended to read 579 as follows: 580 DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU): ^ type ofae *'��* 581 f-esidential unit that is loomed on the same lot as a single family attached or detached 582 dwelling unit, either-inter-R—al to off- to t-he, single- family unit 0-F ill a detaehed 583 structure. The accessory ",elling unit shall be a complete housekeeping unit with 584 , 585 bathroom facilities. 586 A type of accessory use that includes a residential unit located on the same lot as a 587 separate principal use, either within the principal structure or within a separate accessory LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 588 structure. The accessory dwelling unit shall be a complete housekeeping unit with a 589 shared or separate entrance, and separate kitchen, sleeping area, closet space, and 590 bathroom facilities. 591 592 593 b. Amending the definition of"BUILDING COVERAGE." That the definition of 594 "BUILDING COVERAGE" shall be amended to read as follows: 595 BUILDING COVERAGE: That percentage of the lot covered by principal or accessory 596 buildings, including cantilevered portions of the building_ 597 598 c. Adding the definition of"ATLAS, 5-ACRE,AND 10-ACRE PLATS." That the 599 definition of"ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS"be added and inserted into 600 the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 601 ATLAS, 5-ACRE,AND 10-ACRE PLATS: a map depicting the subdivisions of land 602 within the City. These plats are a scheme of how the City was originally laid out. The 603 City started with plats A through L, Salt Lake Ci . Survey. As the City expanded its 604 boundaries, 5 acre and 10 acre Big Field Survey Plats were added and then the numbered 605 plats 1 through 76. They show information about streets,public right of ways and, some 606 private right of wad 607 608 609 d. Adding the definition of"BALCONY." That the definition of"BALCONY"be added 610 and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 611 BALCONY: An elevated floor space projecting beyond the exterior walls of a building 612 that is not supported on the ,ground by posts, columns, or similar supporting structural 613 elements. A balcony shall not be used as a means for entry into a building 614 615 616 e. Adding the definition of"BIKE LANE." That the definition of"BIKE LANE"be 617 added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 618 BIKE LANE: a division of a road for use by cyclists marked off with painted lines or 619 other means. 620 621 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 622 f. Adding the definition of"BIKE PATH." That the definition of"BIKE PATH"be 623 added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 624 BIKE PATH: a path or road for bicycles and not motor vehicles. May include paths that 625 also allow pedestrian or equestrian access. 626 627 628 g. Adding the definition of"DECK." That the definition of"DECK"be added and 629 inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 630 DECK: A platform sitting above finished grade and supported on the ground. 631 632 633 h. Adding the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED)." That 634 the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED)"be added and 635 inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 636 DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED): An accessory dwelling unit located 637 wholly within a structure that is accessory to the principal use and buildings on a lot or 638 parcel. 639 640 641 i. Adding the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL)." That 642 the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL)"be added and 643 inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 644 DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL 645 An accessory dwelling unit created: 646 1. within a primary building; and 647 2. for the purpose of offering a long-term rental of 30 consecutive days or longer. 648 649 j. Adding the definition of"FOOTPRINT." That the definition of"FOOTPRINT"be 650 added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 651 FOOTPRINT: The measurement of lot area covered by a building, including cantilevered 652 portions of the building_ 653 654 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 655 k. Adding the definition of"NON-RESIDENTIAL USE." That the definition of"NON- 656 RESIDENTIAL USE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical 657 order to read as follows: 658 NON-RESIDENTIAL USE: lands, buildings or structures or portions thereof used or 659 designed or intended for uses other than a residential use, including,but not limited to, 660 commercial, industrial and institutional uses. 661 662 663 1. Adding the definition of"PORCH." That the definition of"PORCH"be added and 664 inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 665 PORCH: An unenclosed structure attached to a building, covered by a separate roof, and 666 providing access to an entrance to a building. Similar structures providing access to an 667 entrance other than the primary entrance shall be considered a covered deck when located 668 on a platform that is more than two feet(2') above finished grade. 669 670 671 in. Adding the definition of"ROOFTOP PATIO." That the definition of"ROOFTOP 672 PATIO" be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read 673 as follows: 674 ROOFTOP PATIO: A portion of a flat roof that is dedicated to occupiable space, or a 675 deck sitting atop a roof. 676 677 678 n. Adding the definition of"SHORT TERM RENTAL." That the definition of"SHORT 679 TERM RENTAL"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical 680 order to read as follows: 681 SHORT TERM RENTAL: The use of a dwelling unit or units that are offered for rent or 682 lease for a period less than 30 days. 683 684 685 o. Adding the definition of"TRANSIT ROUTE." That the definition of"TRANSIT 686 ROUTE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to 687 read as follows: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 688 TRANSIT ROUTE: a route over which a public transit vehicle travels and that is 689 specifically labeled or numbered for the purpose of picking up and dropping_off 690 passengers at regularly scheduled stops and intervals. 691 692 693 p. Adding the definition of"UPLIGHTING." That the definition of"UPLIGHTING"be 694 added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 695 UPLIGHTING: Lights that have been designed to throw illumination upward. 696 697 SECTION 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first 698 publication. 699 700 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of 701 , 2023. 702 703 CHAIRPERSON 704 705 ATTEST: 706 707 708 CITY RECORDER 709 710 711 Transmitted to Mayor on 712 713 714 Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. 715 716 717 718 MAYOR 719 720 721 CITY RECORDER 722 723 (SEAL) 724 725 Bill No. of 2023. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 726 Published: 727 728 729 Ordinance amending ADU regulations 730 ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor 1 9 and NEIGHBORHOODS Q' =� Blake Thomas Director I T\mil CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL CIS (Dec 12,202214:58 MST) Date Received: 12/12/2022 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 12/12/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 12/09/2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Orion Goff, Deputy Director, Department of Community&Neighborhoods O1_me G04' Orion Goff(Dec 9,202214:38 MST) SUBJECT: Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Text Amendment (PLNPCM2022-00475) STAFF CONTACT: Michael McNamee, Principal Planner michael.mcnamee(a,slcgov.com or 801-535-7226 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission and adopt the changes to the Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission voted to initiate a petition at their February 9, 2022 hearing to eliminate the conditional use requirement for detached accessory dwelling units(ADUs)in single-family residential zoning districts. Subsequently,the City Council discussed the amendment during the March 8,2022 work session and provided additional direction to staff. Staff expanded the proposal to include significant revisions of the requirements in the City's current ADU Ordinance, many of which have been identified as impediments to the construction of ADUs in Salt Lake City. In order to address impediments to ADU construction, make ADU requirements easier to understand,and improve the quality of ADU construction,staff revised or introduced the following requirements: SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 1 • Remove conditional use requirement for detached ADUs in single-family zoning districts. • Maximum allowable size of a detached ADU was increased from 650 square feet to 1,000 square feet for residential lots less than 12,000 square feet in size, or 1,200 square feet for other lots. The requirement that ADUs be no larger than 50 percent of the footprint of the principal structure was also removed. This allows for the development of ADUs that can accommodate larger households. • Setbacks from side and rear property lines for a single-story detached ADU were changed from 4 feet to 3 feet. For second-story and two-story ADUs above 17 feet in height, setbacks were changed so that the increase in setback is commensurate with the increase in height. This is a significant change from the existing 10 foot setback required for all two-story ADUs. • Introducing ADUs as a permitted accessory use to duplex, multi-family, and non- residential properties, expanding the number of properties where they could be built. Currently, ADUs are only permitted on properties with a single-family home as the principal use. • Where detached ADUs are located near public alleys, the proposal includes requirements to activate the alley, with the goal of making alleys more useful and safer public spaces. • In order to create consistency and ease of future reviews, staff included new definitions of short term rental, deck/porch/balcony, bike lane/path, non-residential use, and more. • The proposed amendment leaves a requirement for one parking stall to be provided for an ADU in place, and adds the following circumstances under which the requirement to provide an off-street stall can be waived: o The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off-street parking requirement. o The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking requirement. o The property is within one-half mile of a designated bicycle lane or path. Staff also revised the land use tables to permit ADUs in zoning districts outside of the residential zones, but where other types of residential uses are allowed. Currently, ADUs are permitted in 19 zoning districts and allowed as a conditional use in 6 zoning districts. Under the proposal, ADUs would be permitted in 7 of the 7 commercial districts, 4 of the 4 Transit Station Area (TSA) districts, 4 of the 4 Form-Based (FB) districts, 4 of the 4 Downtown districts, and the Gateway Mixed-Use District. In total, ADUs would be permitted by right in 45 of the City's 54 zoning districts. They would continue to be prohibited in zones where no other residential uses are currently permitted. On pages 2-5 of the staff report, there is a discussion of how specific zoning districts would be affected, as well as maps comparing where ADUs are currently permitted to where they would be permitted under the changes. Staff also adjusted the limitation on accessory structure size in the FR, R-1, R-2 and SR zoning districts. The size limitation will no longer be 720 square feet or 1000 square feet for duplexes,but rather would be limited to 50% of the rear yard and the maximum lot coverage for the zoning district if located within the buildable area. The Planning Commission considered the request in a public hearing on September 14, 2022 and recommended the City Council approve the proposed amendment. As part of their 2 recommendation, they included a condition that the maximum allowable size of a detached ADU be increased from what was proposed by staff. The proposal originally had called for a maximum size of 720 square feet for a detached ADU, an increase from the currently adopted ordinance, which allows for up to 650 square feet. In order to accommodate more family-sized ADUs, the Planning Commission added a condition that the maximum allowable size be increased to 1,000 square feet.That maximum would apply to lots in residential zoning districts that are 12,000 square feet in size or less. On other lots, the maximum size would be 1,200 square feet, which is unchanged from the original proposal. PUBLIC PROCESS: Community Council Notice: A notice of application was sent to all recognized community organizations on May 18, 2022, per City Code Chapter 2.60 with a link to the online open house webpage. The recognized organizations were given 45 days to respond with any concerns or to request staff to meet with them and discuss the proposed zoning amendment. The 45-day public engagement period ended on July 5, 2022. Staff presented to the Sugar House and Yalecrest Community Councils at their request.After the Planning Commission hearing, staff also presented to the East Liberty Park Community Organization at their request. Public Open House: An online open house was held from May 17, 2022, to September 14, 2022. Fourteen written comments were submitted to the Planning Division after the publication of the staff report. Those comments have been included in Exhibit 5. Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 14,2022. The public hearing was posted on the Planning Division website,the Utah Public Notice website, and shared through the Planning Division email listserv. No entities have requested mailed notice of this proposal and no mailed notice was provided. Written comments were provided to the Planning Commission. There three public comments made during the public hearing. The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are linked in this document. The Commission voted 7-2 to forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council with the condition that the maximum allowable size of an ADU be increased from 720 square feet to 1,000 square feet. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of September 14, 2022 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of September 14, 2022 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of September 14, 2022 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3) Ordinance 4) Memorandum to the Planning Commission Serving as Record of Decision to Initiate Petition 3 5) Public Comment Received after Planning Commission Staff Report was Published 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS: L CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORDINANCE 4. MEMORANDUM TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 5. PUBLIC COMMENT 5 L CHRONOLOGY 6 ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor 1 9 and NEIGHBORHOODS Q' =� Blake Thomas Director PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2022-00475 February 9,2022 Petition initiated by the a vote of the Planning Commission. May 12,2022 Petition assigned to Michael McNamee,Principal Planner. May 17,2022 Application posted for the online open house. May 18,2022 Notice mailed to all Community Councils. September 2,2022 Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. September 8,2022 Staff report posted to Planning's website. September 14,2022 Planning Commission Meeting and Public Hearing: A positive recommendation was forwarded to City Council with one condition. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 7 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 8 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2022-000475. The Planning Commission voted on February 9, 2022 to initiate a petition to amend the City's ADU Ordinance. The proposed code revisions would eliminate the conditional use requirement for detached ADUs in single-family residential zones. They would also aim to lower zoning barriers to construction of ADUs in general. The proposed changes would seek to strike a better balance between encouraging construction of ADUs and mitigating impacts to neighboring properties. (Staff Contact: Michael McNamee at 801-535-7226) As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the city Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TBD TIME: 7:00 PM PLACE: *Electronic and In-Person Options City and County Building Room 326 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah This meeting will be held via electronic means,while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Michael McNamee at 801-535-7226 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail or michael.mcnameekslcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the "planning" tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2022-00475. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments(c-r�,slc og v.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 9 3. ORDINANCE 10 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 202_ 3 4 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 2 1 A of the 5 Salt Lake City Code pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations) 6 7 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 2 1 A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 8 to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475 pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations. 9 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission("Planning Commission")held a 10 public hearing on September 14, 2022 to consider a petition submitted by the Planning 11 Commission(Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475)to amend various sections of Title 2 1 A of the 12 Salt Lake City Code pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations; and 13 WHEREAS, at its September 14, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor 14 of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council") on said 15 petition; and 16 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 17 adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 19 20 SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That Section 21 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 22 Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the use 23 category "Dwelling, accessory unit" in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential 24 Districts, which use category shall read and appear in that table as follows: 25 11 o � k / a � IT � a 2 k % » a 2 k § � � \ a � \ \ E § $ a Q 2 - ® a � 2 2 � 2 \ � � \ � � a w � % § � J Q � G G LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 28 SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 29 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 30 Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use 31 subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 32 Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in 33 alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District CN CB CSl CC CSHBDI CG SNB Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P P P P 34 35 SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.035. That Section 36 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 37 Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a 38 new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 39 Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that 40 table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Dwelling: Accessory P P P P P P P P unit 41 42 SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 43 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 44 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use 13 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 45 subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 46 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in 47 alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P 48 49 SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.060. That Section 50 21A.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 51 Conditional Uses in the Gateway District) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use 52 subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 53 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in 54 alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: 55 Use G-MU Dwelling: Accessory unit P 56 57 SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That Section 58 2 IA.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 59 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new 60 use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and 61 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in 62 alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: 63 14 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Permitted Uses By District Use FB- FB-UN2 FB-SC FB-SE UNl Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P 64 65 SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.050.B.2. That 66 Subsection 21A.40.050.B.2 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and 67 Structures: General Yard, Bulk and Height Limitations) shall be and hereby is amended to read as 68 follows: 69 2. Building Coverage: 70 71 a. In the FR,R-1,R-2 and SR residential districts the 72 maximum footprint of any accessory building, , 73 , shall not exceed fifty 74 percent(50%)of the building footprint of the principal structure up to a maximum o 75 sep�,m htmdfed twent-y(720)squm fi��for-a single family&,elliag and one thousand 76 , 77 78 79 aeeessafy s4icieVdfe. except as follows: 80 81 Notwithstanding the size of the footprint of the principal building, at least 480 square 82 feet of accessory buildingcoverage overage shall be allowed subject to the compliance with all 83 other requirements in Section 21A.40.050. 84 Accessory buildings constructed within the buildable area that are located between the 85 rear facade of the principal building and the rear yard setback may exceed 720 square 86 feet provided the building is located entirely within the buildable area and the property 87 complies with the maximum buildingcge requirements of the underlyin zoning oning 88 district. 89 (3) The buildingcge for a detached accessory dwelling unit shall be subject to the 90 standards in 21A.40.200,regardless of the buildingcge requirement in this 91 section. 92 L4) An accessory building that contains an accessory dwelling unit on the second level 93 may exceed the maximum coverage up to the footprint of the accessory dwelling unit. 94 95 b. The combined coverage for all hoop houses,greenhouses,and cold frames shall not 96 exceed thirty five percent(35%)of the building footprint of the principal structure. 15 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 97 SECTION 8.Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.40.200.That Section 98 21A.40.200 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Accessory Uses,Buildings and Structures: Accessory 99 Dwelling Units)shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 100 21 A.40.200: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: 101 102 A. e Sta4emex*: Tlh-e „late,-y ifAefAiens of this s etio,, e 103 104 105 ' 107 , and the 108 effibedied energy eentained within existing st...,,.Pafe&. 109 , 110 families seek ng s llef-households; 111 , 112 grown el ex, to r-emaix in their-homes and neighbor-hoods, and obtain ext-F 113 ineeme o ,-ity eempanionship, and se o . 114 6. Weader the range of &,.,a ble housing+h,.attghotit the City; 115 , 116 ; 117 118 neaf tfa- sit; -Ha 120 . 121 122 " shall mean the 123 €elle 124 125 1. A ;,-diyi d,,,I*,hA ;s 1 i s t e d e n a o CC ofdea devd ellvifle-rof the r pe ft�.. 126 , adoption to an individual who is list 127 ; 128 -3-.— An individual A"e is a tmster-of a family tmst as legal owner-ship of th-e 129 Pfapefty. 130 131 , 132 " , of this title- and subjeet to eomplianee with the appheable pr-ovisi 133 of this title. 134 , but iie 135 . 136 137 1. Get",et4ing existing living area within a single family &viling as —P14q- -Additipffiq-t 138 , 139 ,t-;44 CC t-i-A_ .. 16 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 140 2. Conveffing an existing detaehed aeeessety building, as an addition to an existing 141 aeoessefy building, or- newly psu,.,,e'te' -Aevessofy b u lrl;n. 142 143 . 144 145 1. enemal-Requirements A ioa-le�e All AevessefDwelling Units- 146 147 a. One no,-Lot: City may o..fnit o aeoessefy dwelling unit t-1,.,t. 148 eentains a single family a.,,elli . i, Not n Unit Of D � A t � t l lr; f 149 � e��,�secesr,�M �u���a�se�el=e_ --=>��-e= 150 151 152ip: An aeee fy dwelling tmit shall not be sold sepafa4e!y or-subdivide 153 ,.,. dhe pfineipal &,elling unitoff-lot, nlosss oempliant.With sub.1iyi 154 155 Oee"aney. The City shall only pef-R-4-4--aift-aeevossafy dwelling Unit When 156 an owner-eeeupant lives on the pf-opei4y within eithef the pf-ineipal of aeeessai-j 157 158 1) T1, 1, b fide L.r 1 r 159 (r,-zacvwa��as-il-vvir%l-=xc«ten=�visriy-izv.rel-1 ea�.r-�� 160 , 162 qualify for-this o eptior� 163 , assisted!iN,iffg f4eility of 164 , 165 living f e l;t;oss of eoffi-munities. 166 167 168 &,elling unit may t e-xeeedthe n*mber-allowed for-a "f s ,lamed 169 Jeestie„ -2 A.67 040, «ryea, tiea-Of Teffns", of this title. 170 fr1rvxneOcecrpations: Home oeeupations may be een"Eted in an aeeessofy 171 &,e11iRg ti rit a s p o o t-;AR 2J A.16 n30 f't-b,;- t-;t-10 172 g. Pa-king. An aeeessofy dwelling, it shallr-e v Humf one on site 173 , the dr-iveway area loeate 174 between the pr-opei4y line with an aE�aeent street and a legally leea4ed off street 175 176 1 use is eomplied with and the dr-iveway afea has a spaee that is at least 177 twenty feet (20') deep by eight feet (9'` wide.e The, afki it may be 178eR it 179 180 181 stfbjeet pfopefty; 182 (2) The subjeet pfopeftyii loeated within one-quaff (1 A) ,-.,;le of fansn step. 183 17 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 184 2. Additional Requifemen4s Fef-Aeeessef-y Dwelling Units Loea4ed Within A Single 185 Family Dwelling: Aeoessery dwelling units leeatead iwiah-ina singie family dwelling 186 shall eemply with the following standaf-ds: 187 188 a. Any addition shall eomply with the building heigM, yaf-d fvquir-ements-,� 189 191 et:ty i,,eatea . ithii .,r IN Hist Over-lay Dist- iet 192 b. Size Re . * I No aeeessofy dwelling tmit shall oeeup),more than fifty 193 Pefeex (50094o) of the gross square footage of the single family-d-well e 194 square footage of an attaehed gaf-age shall not be ineluded in the gross squafe 195 196 habitable s e below the g 197 6. EfAfaneea LAW,At-i A--n---;- EfAfanees to an aeeessofy dwelling u 4-4-i t t ha t —Ar-ev locate 198 within a single family dwelling shall only be pefmit4ed in the following leea4ions:. 199 200 (1) An existing entfanee to the single family dwelling; 201 , 202 shall be sot > aekfninim*mof twenty feet (20') ffofn the f r4 building ing 203 €ate 204 (3) Extefiof stairs heading to an etitfanee above theist level of the pfineipal 205 ; 206 207 , "Side 208 En"Buildings", of this title; 209 (5) boeated AM-tl e�eff-m-Fae-ade-of the ellifig 210 (6) Leeated; a silo j,afdpfovided the side yafd ; t least eight feet(8') ; 211 212 if4o the side yafd. 213 214 3. Additional Requirements For-An Aeeessof�,Dwelling Unit Loea4ed in A Detae 215 216 building or-as an addition to a-a existi g y building shall eomply with the 217 , 218 by the Histor-ie Landmark Commission for-a pr-opefty i,,eatea ; an u Histo,-ie 219 220 221 Requir-emel3ts: Shall somplywT a"�'�'eable genefal ya� bulk 222 223 224 evef-lay zoning distfiet unless othef-wise regulated by this seetion. An aeeesse 225 226 shall not eount towafds the fnwd footage of all aeeessor-y buildings as 227 stated in suh-aeEtion of this ehapter. The aeeessot=ybu g 228 229 Pf ° , 18 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 230 exeeed six hundred fifty (650) squaf-e feet. An aeeessefy building that eef4ains all 231 232 11 >,,,;1d;,,n eovo f-av o 0 or�.4 ; or#ip, 1 n nn ncn .f this t,,,.tv, 233 234 v o efAs of the, rdo,.lying zoning d;stri,.tor- p1;,.able over-lay zeffifig 236 237 238 lino and be subjeet to the following seth ek ro 239 240 (1) Shall be 1,.eated aminimum often feet(10') ffefa the single family dwelling 241 242 Pfopefty. 243 (2) Side- ear yavd- ssetbae-kas- 244 245 ' 246 ffefa any side of fear-lot line 247 248 loeated a fniniffmm of f feet ( ,) f o afty sideor- -eaf lot line. if afa 249 existing aeoessofy building ineludes an addition, all f,,..,.oftions of the 250 existing stf et e may by used as an aeeessoi=yd, v11; tffiit pfevidea t 251 252 be altered to p1„with the riie-a le seet ,.,,s of the adopted-Fife. � do 253 of the- 254 (CTQeee �, " tie seeend sler�,alditio-m-m-to a4aexisting aeee-srrofy 255 building ; fmitted p „dod the, se ,-.d stofy addit n has , 256 sethaek of ten feet (1 n') f,.,v, a side of o pfopei4jT line and the se „d 257 258 &,o11;r,.units 1,.ea4ed on a v „d floo. f a detached aeeessofy building. 259 , 260 fedueed t f of feet (n>) 261 262 d Building Height: 263 265 266 pfopefty o exeeed seventeen feet (1 7') i height ,,.>1iehe„ef is less 267 268 Exeeption: if the single family dwelling on the pfopefty is ovef seventeen 269 , 270 faay be e"al to the height of the single family dwelling up to a maxi 271 (24') for-a*aeeessot=y buildifig with-a 272 r;tehed r-oof of v wen4„ feet (20') for-an aeeessofy building with t 4 roof 273 pfovided the aeeessof y building ding ; of i...,,.v , ffl-iffl-iffl-uffl- of tea feet (10') f om , 274 side of fear-pfepeftThe et-baek for additional height may be r-e"ee4-o 275 (42) if the side of feoff-lot 1-ine is aE�aeefA to an alley 19 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 277 bu i 1 ding s with ., r;tehe,1 , "f.,,,a t"the top ofthe r o"f1ine f a�.,t r "f. 278 279 280 281 found in seetion 2 1 A.4 0.050 of this ohapter, 1-1-4-Ho iffi-st—anee shall any aeoesse 282 ,1,.,o11;rg , r;t o ooa a gfess floor o ofsi; htffi fe 1,;fl„ (650) squaf e feet. 283 284 building shall be 1eeatoa: 285 286 , publie street of faeing the f-eaf faeade of the single family 287 288 (2 ao " v pr-opei4y line provided the entr- nee is 1oeato a , 289 of ten feet(10') f"m the sideor-r-ear-pr-opefty line 290 (3) DAer-ior-stairs leading to an efAfanee shall be leeated a fnininium of ten feet 291 ' 292 293 . 294 295 296 0 dwelling unit shall , r1.,with the following st,,,,,1,,,.ds: 297 298 (1) Windows shall be no lafger-than neeessary to eemply with the fnini 299 , elefestafy 300 windows, or-obseuf ed glazing shall be used vihea faeing a side or-r-e 301 propeAy line t oomply imith Building Goder-equi-re-momfl-ts f,.., 302 and light "r boil-di is that e „within to feet(1 n') of a side of 303 304 (2) Exeept as required insu seEtiot.---^g(1) of this 305 307 (3) Window openings loeated on the " n floor„;thin an existing aeoessefy 308 building, i"ether-eofifofming or-non eonfofming with window regulations i 309 this ehaptef, 310 Existing windows ows loea4ed on a v „a level within ., o isti. n 311 312 313 ' . Balconies And Deelc-s- BR_Alseinea d dee��,�all be designed as fell� 314 315 (1) Shali rot o ooa o gh4y (90) sEtuar-e feet; siZe, .,1,0„ le-eated above the "found 316 level of the building; 317 eeted -A�Tini—m—mi of ten fee (1 n2) f o v, ., side of,-eaf Ya=crlotline 318 unless the r1;,.able side " ,,,-,a 1"t- line ; ,,,1;,,,,o,it t" a-H 110,,. 319 (3) Ree=tep-decks are pfohibited, 320 20 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 321 322 shall oomply with the following: 323 324 1. Applieation- 325 326 327 21A.08 f t.his title. 328 329 (1) Get4ifieate Of Oeeupa-aey:A eet4ifieate of oeeupaney for-the n�n"n i-ig-vi 331 issued at the same time as the eei4ifteate of oeeupa-ney. if a eei4ifieate of 332 , the zooifig eei4ifieate shall be issued pfief to the 333 n D T being oeetipied. 334 (-)O a T i ,,a P,.,,gFafn: Tel-u-si :,z i4:p€efthe�e4#gal-o= 335 either-the ADUor-the single family dwelling, the oNN%er-shall be o oilea ; 336 in title 5, es, 337 Lieenses And Regulations", of Code pfiof te 3ningeet4ineate. 338 339 b. Building ing nefm it: Apply for-and i -a buil-ding eifflitferthe pfepe�e� 340aeeessor-y dwelling nit .,,.moss f, -eat a A-f PCfPC-at iA_i. 341 342 343 344 . 345 346 347 shall have eed festfietien,, theme eh shall e appfoved by the 348 ' 349 . 350 ssorch deed-fest-vipvtion- sh-All tuin m4th the land until Ohio aeekesssor-y dwelling Uflit is 351 abandoned o fevoked. 352 353 354 355 ,ela4ives of the r pefty ownen 356 357 358 this seetion, 359 . 360 361 detailing the ftumbef of applieations, 362 , 363 showing appfoved aeeessofy &,elling units. The fepoft shall be transmitted to the Givy 365 21 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 366 A. Purpose: the re_u�rypurpose of this section is to promote an increase in the housing 367 stock within the ci . and promote housing choices by allowing_ and regulating accessory 368 dwelling units (ADUs). 369 370 B. Conflicting Regulations. If a regulation found in this section is in conflict with an 371 applicable regulation in the base zoning district, overlay district, or provision of_enteral 372 applicability, the regulation in this chapter shall take precedence, with the following 373 exceptions: 374 375 1. The regulations set forth in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; and 376 2. The Special Foothills Regulations set forth in Subsection 21A.24.010.P of this title. 377 C. Owner Occupancy Required. The owner of the property, as defined in this section, shall 378 reside on the property. For the purposes of this title, "owner occupant" shall mean the 379 following: 380 381 1. An individual who is listed on a recorded deed as an owner of the property; 382 2. AU person who is related by blood,marriage, adoption to an individual who is listed on 383 recorded deed as an owner of the property; or 384 3. An individual who is a trustor of a family trust who possesses legal ownership of the 385 ro e . 386 4. Exceptions: 387 388 a. Owner occupancy is not required for an ADU located on a property with a principal 389 use as a duplex,multi-family dwelling, or non-residential land use.A single-family 390 dwelling with an attached ADU does not constitute a duplex. 391 b. The owner has a bona fide,temporary absence of three(3)years or less for activities 392 such as military service,temporaryjob assignments,sabbaticals, or volun service 393 (indefinite periods of absence from the dwelling shall not qualify for this exception 394 or 395 c. The owner is placed in a hospital,nursing home, assisted livingf acility or other 396 similar facility that provides regular medical care,excluding retirement living facilities 397 or communities. 398 D. Number of Allowed ADUs: A single ADU is allowed on a property where permitted in 399 Chapter 21A.33 of this title. 400 401 E. Location on property. An ADU is allowed in the following locations on a property as 402 indicated below: 403 404 1. Internal ADUs shall be located within the buildable area of the property. 405 2. A detached ADU shall be allowed as indicated in the table below: 406 407 408 22 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Front yard Not ermitted Corner Sided Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is no closer to the corner side property line than the principal structure. Interior Side yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is located behind the rear fa ade of the principal building. Rearms Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below. Buildable area Permitted Notes 1. The use of the term yard in this section shall be interpreted to mean a required indicated in the underlying zonin district. 409 410 3. A detached ADU shall be placed at a minimum distance from property lines as indicated 411 below: Rear property line 3' Side ro e line 3' Corner Side property line 10, Notes: 1. Additions to an existing accessory building shall comply with the setbacks in this table. This includes additions that add a second story. 2. An existing accessory building that is being converted to an ADU may maintain the existing setbacks of the accessory building. If a conversion includes an expansion (includingadding dding a second story,)the expansion shall comply with all applicable setback requirements in this table and in Subsection 2 1 A.40.200.F. 412 413 414 F. ADU Building Height: 415 416 1. The maximum building height for a detached ADU is 17 feet, subject to the following 417 exceptions: 418 419 a. Height may be increased up to 24 feet for a pitched roof or 20 feet for a flat roof 420 provided the side and rear yard setbacks are increased one foot for each additional foot 421 in building height above 17 feet. The setback does not need to be increased above the 422 minimum indicated in Section E on the side of an ADU that abuts an alley or on the 423 side of an ADU that abuts a property that is in a zoning district other than those listed 424 in Chapter 21A.24 of this title. 425 b. Converting a legally existing accessory building is permitted when the existing 426 accessory building exceeds the permitted height of this section. 427 c. When an ADU is located fully within the buildable area of the property,the height of 428 the ADU is allowed up to the permitted height of the principal buildingin n the 429 underlyingzoning oning district. 23 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 430 d. Solar panels attached to the roof of an ADU are permitted to exceed the maximum 431 height of the structure up to four feet. 432 433 2. Building height for a detached ADU shall be measured in the same manner as the height 434 for the principal building. 435 3. An internal ADU is subject to the same height requirements as the principal building. 436 G. ADU Parking: 437 438 1. The number of parking stalls talls provided for the principal use shall not be reduced below the 439 minimum identified in Chapter 21A.44 of this Title in order to accommodate an ADU. 440 One parking stall is required for the ADU,except as indicated below: 441 442 a. The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off street parking requirement; 443 b. The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking 444 requirement for the principal use; 445 c. The property is within a'/4 mile radius of a public transit stogy 446 d. The property is within'/2 mile of a city-designated bicycle lane or path; or 447 e. The City allows on-street parking along the street frontage of the property and there is 448 a minimum,uninterrupted curb length which meets city requirements to accommodate 449 at least one on-street parking stall. 450 H. Regulation of Decks, Patios, and Outdoor Space for Detached ADUs: 451 452 1. Decks more than 2 feet above the existing grade are prohibited unless the ADU is located 453 within the buildable area of the lot in which case the deck shall be subject to the same 454 regulations for decks that apply to the principal building. 455 2. Rooftgp patios on a detached ADU are prohibited. 456 3. Patios are permitted. A patio may be covered with a roof provided the square footage of 457 the roof is no larger than 120 square feet and the covered patio complies with the setbacks 458 required of the ADU. A covered patio shall not count towards the maximum square 459 footage requirement of the ADU,but does count towards the total buildingcoy overa eg of the 460 lot. 461 4. Balconies on ADUs: a balcony is permitted on a building containing an ADU provided 462 the balcony does not extend into a required ADU setback and extends no further than 5 463 feet from an exterior wall of the ADU. Balconies shall not contain HVAC equipment nor 464 be used as stora eg areas. 465 5. Internal ADUs shall be subject to the same standards for decks,patios, and other 466 encroachments that apply to the principal building and use. 467 I, ADUs located along a public alley. A detached ADU that is located within 15 feet of a 468 public alley shall include the following_ 469 470 1. An exterior light shall be located on the exterior wall of the ADU to illuminate portions of 471 the alley adjacent to the ADU. The lighting fixture shall be shielded,oriented and 24 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 472 desimed to direct light down and avoid light pollution onto adjacent properties. All 473 oli lg Zting is prohibited. 474 2. A 4' wide path from the alley to the entrance of the ADU shall be provided. If there is a 475 fence between the ADU and the alleygate shall be provided, and the path shall lead to 476 the gate. If the ADU is located within 15 feet of two or more public alleys,this 477 requirement shall only apply to one of the alleys. 478 3. An ADU located on an alley that exists on the recorded plat maps or Atlas Plats of the city 479 but has not been used for vehicular access or is otherwise blocked by encroachments such 480 as fences or vegetation are exempt from this requirement. 481 482 J. ADU Gross Floor Area: 483 484 1. Detached ADU.None may exceed 1,000 square feet in,gross floor area, except that a 485 maximum of 1,200 square feet in,gross floor area shall be allowed when the subject 486 roe : 487 488 a. Is in a zoning district other than those listed in Chapter 21A.24 of this title; 489 b. Exceeds 12,000 square feet in lot area; or 490 c. Is part of a planned development that includes a minimum of four dwelling 491 492 2. Internal ADU. There is no maximum gross floor area provided the building complies with 493 all applicable standards in the underlyin zoning district. 494 3. Gross floor area for a detached ADU shall be calculated as follows: 495 496 a. When the building includes other allowed accessory uses, only. t�quare footage 497 dedicated to the ADU shall be counted. 498 b. When the ADU is on a second level, stairs and required landings providing access to 499 the ADU shall not be counted. 500 c. Loft space with a ceiling height lower than 7 feet within an ADU shall not be counted 501 towards the total square footage of the ADU. 502 d. Basements shall not count towards the maximum,gross floor area of the ADU, so long 503 as: 504 505 i. The basement is only used for storage or a use permitted by section 21A.40.040.E 506 of this chapter; and 507 ii. There is no internal circulation between the ADU and the basement. 508 K. Second Story Windows. Windows on the second story of a detached ADU are prohibited 509 on an exterior wall that is adjacent to a side or rear property line unless: 510 511 1. The window is a clerestory window where the bottom of the window is at least 6 feet 512 above the finished floor of the second story; 513 2. The window is on a wall that faces an elevation of the principal building; 514 3. The window faces and is at least 10 feet from a side or rear pLo _pea line; 25 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 515 4. The exterior wall is adjacent to an alley; or 516 5. The window faces aside or rear property line that is adjacent to a property in a zoning 517 district that permits commercial uses or a property that contains a nonresidential use. 518 L. Maximum Building Coverage. Accessory dwelling units are subject to the maximum 519 building and yard coverage requirements of the applicable zoning and overlay districts. 520 521 M. Building Permit Required. A building permit is required to establish any ADU in the 522 city. All ADUs are required to comply with all adopted applicable codes including but 523 not limited to building, fire, and public utilities. 524 525 N. Administrative Regulations: the following administrative regulations are intended to 526 provide direction on applying and interpretingthe regulations of this chapter. 527 528 1. There is no minimum lot size required for an ADU. 529 2. An ADU does not count towards the density allowed in the underlyin zoning district. 530 3. ADUs that have been approved prior to (date of adoption),as part of a conditional use are 531 considered legal conforming uses and may be modified if the modification complies with 532 the requirements of this section and any other applicable standard of this title. 533 O. Zoning Certificate and Good Landlord Program: 534 535 1. A certificate of occupancy for the ADU shall not be issued until a zoning certificate is 536 issued.A zoning certificate may be issued at the same time as the certificate of occupancy_ 537 If a certificate of occupancy is not required,the zoning certificate shall be issued prior to 538 the ADU being occupied. 539 2. If a business license is required for the rental of the ADU,the owner shall be enrolled in 540 the landlord/tenant initiative program as defined in Title 5,"Business Taxes,Licenses And 541 Regulations", of this code prior to issuing a zoning certificate. 542 P. Restrictive Covenant: An ADU that is required to be owner occupied shall have a 543 restrictive covenant filed against the property on which the ADU is located, which 544 restrictive covenant shall include the following information: 545 546 1. A description of the primary dwelling and the ADU,including whether the ADU is within 547 the principal structure or a detached structure,the square footage of both the primary 548 dwelling and the ADU,and how off-street parking is allocated between the primary 549 dwelling and the ADU. 550 2. A statement that the ADU may only be used and occupied in accordance with the 551 applicable regulations adopted in the Salt Lake City Code. 552 3. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office 553 against the subject property. A cony of the recorded covenant shall be provided to the 554 planning division and attached to the building permit record prior to fmal inspection of the 555 ADU. If no final inspection is required,the copy of the recorded covenant shall be 556 provided prior to occupng the ADU. 26 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 557 Q. Use Regulations: 558 559 1. An ADU shall not be rented as a short term rental as defined in Section 21.A.62.040. 560 2. An ADU may include any home occupation authorized by this title. 561 3. An ADU may be converted to any other accessory use that is allowed in the zoning 562 district. 563 4. An ADU cannot be converted to another principal use. 564 565 SECTION 9.Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.60.020.That Section 566 21A.60.020 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: List of Terms: List of Defined Terms)shall be and 567 hereby is amended to add the following terms in the list of defined terms to be inserted into that list in 568 alphabetical order: 569 Atlas, 5-acre, and 10-acre plats. 570 Balcony. 571 Bike lane. 572 Bike path. 573 Deck. 574 Dwelling, accessory unit (internal). 575 Footprint. 576 Non-residential use. 577 Porch. 578 Rooftop patio. 579 Short term rental. 580 Transit route. 581 Uplighting 582 583 SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 2 IA.62.040. That Section 584 2 IA.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms), shall be and 585 hereby is amended as follows: 586 a. Amending the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU)."That the 587 definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU)" shall be amended to read 588 as follows: 27 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 589 DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU): ^ Pfpe ofae 'hat i ,.hides 590 591 , either-in4efnal to or-a4aehed to the single family tmit or-in a detaehe 592 593 , an 594 . 595 A type of accessory use that includes a residential unit located on the same lot as a 596 separate principal use, either within the principal structure or within a separate accessory 597 structure. The accessory dwelling unit shall be a complete housekeeping unit with a 598 shared or separate entrance, and separate kitchen, sleeping area, closet space, and 599 bathroom facilities. 600 601 602 b. Amending the definition of"BUILDING COVERAGE." That the definition of 603 `BUILDING COVERAGE" shall be amended to read as follows: 604 BUILDING COVERAGE: That percentage of the lot covered by principal or accessory 605 buildings, including cantilevered portions of the building_ 606 607 c. Adding the definition of"ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS." That the 608 definition of"ATLAS, 5-ACRE,AND 10-ACRE PLATS"be added and inserted into 609 the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 610 ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS: a map depicting the subdivisions of land 611 within the City. These plats are a scheme of how the City was originally laid out. The 612 City started with plats A through L, Salt Lake Cijy Survey. As the City expanded its 613 boundaries, 5 acre and 10 acre Big Field Survey Plats were added and then the numbered 614 plats 1 through 76. They show information about streets, public right of ways and, some 615 private right of ways. 616 617 618 d. Adding the definition of`BALCONY." That the definition of`BALCONY"be added 619 and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 620 BALCONY: An elevated floor space projecting beyond the exterior walls of a building 621 that is not supported on the ground by posts, columns, or similar supporting structural 622 elements. A balcony shall not be used as a means for entry into a building_ 623 624 28 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 625 e. Adding the definition of"BIKE LANE." That the definition of"BIKE LANE"be 626 added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 627 BIKE LANE: a division of a road for use by yclists marked off with painted lines or 628 other means. 629 630 631 f. Adding the definition of"BIKE PATH." That the definition of"BIKE PATH"be 632 added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 633 BIKE PATH: a path or road for bicycles and not motor vehicles. May include paths that 634 also allow pedestrian or equestrian access. 635 636 637 g. Adding the definition of"DECK." That the definition of"DECK"be added and 638 inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 639 DECK: A platform sitting above finished grade and supported on the ground. 640 641 642 h. Adding the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED)." That 643 the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED)"be added and 644 inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 645 DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED): An accessory dwelling unit located 646 wholly within a structure that is accessory to the principal use and buildings on a lot or 647 parcel. 648 649 650 i. Adding the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL)." That 651 the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL)"be added and 652 inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 653 DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL: 654 An accessory dwelling unit created: 655 1. within a primary dwelling; 656 2. within the footprint of a primary dwelling at the time the internal accessory dwelling 657 unit is created; and 658 3. for the purpose of offering a long-term rental of 30 consecutive days or longer. 29 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 659 660 j. Adding the definition of"FOOTPRINT." That the definition of"FOOTPRINT"be 661 added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 662 FOOTPRINT: The measurement of lot area covered by a building, including cantilevered 663 portions of the building._ 664 665 666 k. Adding the definition of"NON-RESIDENTIAL USE." That the definition of"NON- 667 RESIDENTIAL USE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical 668 order to read as follows: 669 NON-RESIDENTIAL USE: lands, buildings or structures or portions thereof used or 670 designed or intended for uses other than a residential use, including,but not limited to, 671 commercial, industrial and institutional uses. 672 673 674 1. Adding the definition of"PORCH." That the definition of"PORCH"be added and 675 inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 676 PORCH: An unenclosed structure attached to a building, covered by a separate roof, and 677 providing access to an entrance to a building. Similar structures providing access to an 678 entrance other than the primary entrance shall be considered a covered deck when located 679 on a platform that is more than two feet (2') above finished grade. 680 681 682 in. Adding the definition of"ROOFTOP PATIO." That the definition of"ROOFTOP 683 PATIO"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read 684 as follows: 685 ROOFTOP PATIO: A portion of a flat roof that is dedicated to occupiable space, or a 686 deck sitting atop a roof. 687 688 689 n. Adding the definition of"SHORT TERM RENTAL." That the definition of"SHORT 690 TERM RENTAL"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical 691 order to read as follows: 30 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 692 SHORT TERM RENTAL: The use of a dwelling unit or units that are offered for rent or 693 lease for a period less than 30 dam 694 695 696 o. Adding the definition of"TRANSIT ROUTE." That the definition of"TRANSIT 697 ROUTE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to 698 read as follows: 699 TRANSIT ROUTE: a route over which a public transit vehicle travels and that is 700 specifically labeled or numbered for the purpose of picking up and dropping off 701 passengers at regularly scheduled stops and intervals. 702 703 704 p. Adding the definition of"UPLIGHTING." That the definition of"UPLIGHTING"be 705 added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 706 UPLIGHTING: Lights that have been designed to throw illumination upward. 707 708 SECTION 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first 709 publication. 710 711 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of 712 , 202 . 713 714 CHAIRPERSON 715 716 ATTEST: 717 718 719 CITY RECORDER 720 721 722 Transmitted to Mayor on 723 724 725 Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. 726 31 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 727 728 729 MAYOR 730 731 732 CITY RECORDER 733 734 (SEAL) 735 736 Bill No. of 202. 737 Published: 738 739 740 Ordinance amending ADU regulations 741 32 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 202_ (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 2 1 A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 2 1 A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475 pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission("Planning Commission")held a public hearing on September 14, 2022 to consider a petition submitted by the Planning Commission(Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00475) to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations; and WHEREAS, at its September 14, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council("City Council") on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That Section 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be and hereby is amended to modify only the use category"Dwelling, accessory unit" in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts, which use category shall read and appear in that table as follows: 33 o �, x � a a � a M � a a a � � as A � � M � �, a � � r, � M O � '�^". W a � � M V N � "'� C'r � M � � � � ..w p N a � �--i � O p P-� IfJ � O a O � r o 0 ^' O p,., N rl � O M O � � a w � o N pp r � W ~ N � O ti � a � � �I � � � O ,� � � }'• Q � � SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District CN CB CS, CC CSHBDI CG SNB Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P P P P SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.035. That Section 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Dwelling: Accessory P P P P P P P P unit SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use 35 subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Dwelling: Accessory unit P P P P SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.060. That Section 21A.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: Use G-MU Dwelling: Accessory unit P SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That Section 2 IA.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only to add a new use subcategory titled, "Accessory unit" in the Dwelling category in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, which use category shall be inserted into that table in alphabetical order and shall read and appear in that table as follows: 36 Permitted Uses By District Use FB- FB-UN2 FB-SC FB-SE UNl Dwelling: Accessory unit I P P P P SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.050.B.2. That Subsection 21A.40.050.B.2 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: General Yard, Bulk and Height Limitations) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 2. Building Coverage: a. In the FR,R-1,R-2 and SR residential districts the maximum footprint of any accessory building, shall not exceed fifty percent(50%)of the building footprint of the principal structure except as follows: (1) Notwithstanding the size of the footprint of the principal building,at least 480 square feet of accessory building coverage shall be allowed subject to the compliance with all other requirements in Section 21A.40.050. (2) Accessory buildings constructed within the buildable area that are located between the rear facade of the principal building and the rear yard setback may exceed 720 square feet provided the building is located entirely within the buildable area and the property complies with the maximum building coverage requirements of the underlying zoning district. (3) The building coverage for a detached accessory dwelling unit shall be subject to the standards in 21A.40.200,regardless of the building coverage requirement in this section. (4) An accessory building that contains an accessory dwelling unit on the second level may exceed the maximum coverage up to the footprint of the accessory dwelling unit. b. The combined coverage for all hoop houses,greenhouses,and cold frames shall not exceed thirty five percent(35%)of the building footprint of the principal structure. SECTION 8. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.40.200. That Section 21A.40.200 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Accessory Uses,Buildings and Structures: Accessory Dwelling Units)shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 37 21A.40.200: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: A. Purpose: the regulatory purpose of this section is to promote an increase in the housing stock within the city and promote housing choices by allowing and regulating accessory dwelling units (ADUs). B. Conflicting Regulations. If a regulation found in this section is in conflict with an applicable regulation in the base zoning district, overlay district, or provision of general applicability, the regulation in this chapter shall take precedence, with the following exceptions: 1. The regulations set forth in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; and 2. The Special Foothills Regulations set forth in Subsection 21A.24.010.P of this title. C. Owner Occupancy Required. The owner of the property, as defined in this section, shall reside on the property. For the purposes of this title, "owner occupant" shall mean the following: 1. An individual who is listed on a recorded deed as an owner of the property; 2. Any person who is related by blood,marriage, adoption to an individual who is listed on recorded deed as an owner of the property;or 3. An individual who is a trustor of a family trust who possesses legal ownership of the property. 4. Exceptions: a. Owner occupancy is not required for an ADU located on a property with a principal use as a duplex,multi-family dwelling,or non-residential land use. A single-family dwelling with an attached ADU does not constitute a duplex. b. The owner has a bona fide,temporary absence of three(3)years or less for activities such as military service,temporary job assignments, sabbaticals, or voluntary service (indefinite periods of absence from the dwelling shall not qualify for this exception); or c. The owner is placed in a hospital,nursing home,assisted living facility or other similar facility that provides regular medical care,excluding retirement living facilities or communities. D. Number of Allowed ADUs: A single ADU is allowed on a property where permitted in Chapter 21A.33 of this title. E. Location on property. An ADU is allowed in the following locations on a property as indicated below: 1. Internal ADUs shall be located within the buildable area of the property. 2. A detached ADU shall be allowed as indicated in the table below: 38 Front yard Not permitted Corner Side yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is no closer to the corner side property line than the principal structure. Interior Side yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below and is located behind the rear fa ade of the principal building. Rear yard Permitted if the ADU complies with the required setbacks in the table below. Buildable area Permitted Notes 1. The use of the term yard in this section shall be interpreted to mean a required yard as indicated in the underlying zoning district. 3. A detached ADU shall be placed at a minimum distance from property lines as indicated below: Rear property line 3' Side property line 3' Corner Side property line 10, Notes: 1. Additions to an existing accessory building shall comply with the setbacks in this table. This includes additions that add a second story. 2. An existing accessory building that is being converted to an ADU may maintain the existing setbacks of the accessory building. If a conversion includes an expansion (including adding a second story)the expansion shall comply with all applicable setback requirements in this table and in Subsection 2 1 A.40.200.F. F. ADU Building Height: 1. The maximum building height for a detached ADU is 17 feet, subject to the following exceptions: a. Height may be increased up to 24 feet for a pitched roof or 20 feet for a flat roof provided the side and rear yard setbacks are increased one foot for each additional foot in building height above 17 feet.The setback does not need to be increased above the minimum indicated in Section E on the side of an ADU that abuts an alley or on the side of an ADU that abuts a property that is in a zoning district other than those listed in Chapter 21A.24 of this title. b. Converting a legally existing accessory building is permitted when the existing accessory building exceeds the permitted height of this section. 39 c. When an ADU is located fully within the buildable area of the property,the height of the ADU is allowed up to the permitted height of the principal building in the underlying zoning district. d. Solar panels attached to the roof of an ADU are permitted to exceed the maximum height of the structure up to four feet. 2. Building height for a detached ADU shall be measured in the same manner as the height for the principal building. 3. An internal ADU is subject to the same height requirements as the principal building. G. ADU Parking: 1. The number of parking stalls provided for the principal use shall not be reduced below the minimum identified in Chapter 21A.44 of this Title in order to accommodate an ADU. One parking stall is required for the ADU,except as indicated below: a. The property is in a zoning district with no minimum off street parking requirement; b. The property already contains at least one accessible stall above the minimum parking requirement for the principal use; c. The property is within a'/4 mile radius of a public transit stop; d. The property is within'h mile of a city-designated bicycle lane or path;or e. The City allows on-street parking along the street frontage of the property and there is a minimum,uninterrupted curb length which meets city requirements to accommodate at least one on-street parking stall. H. Regulation of Decks, Patios, and Outdoor Space for Detached ADUs: 1. Decks more than 2 feet above the existing grade are prohibited unless the ADU is located within the buildable area of the lot in which case the deck shall be subject to the same regulations for decks that apply to the principal building. 2. Rooftop patios on a detached ADU are prohibited. 3. Patios are permitted. A patio may be covered with a roof provided the square footage of the roof is no larger than 120 square feet and the covered patio complies with the setbacks required of the ADU. A covered patio shall not count towards the maximum square footage requirement of the ADU,but does count towards the total building coverage of the lot. 4. Balconies on ADUs: a balcony is permitted on a building containing an ADU provided the balcony does not extend into a required ADU setback and extends no further than 5 feet from an exterior wall of the ADU. Balconies shall not contain HVAC equipment nor be used as storage areas. 5. Internal ADUs shall be subject to the same standards for decks,patios,and other encroachments that apply to the principal building and use. I. ADUs located along a public alley. A detached ADU that is located within 15 feet of a public alley shall include the following: 40 1. An exterior light shall be located on the exterior wall of the ADU to illuminate portions of the alley adjacent to the ADU.The lighting fixture shall be shielded, oriented and designed to direct light down and avoid light pollution onto adjacent properties. All uplighting is prohibited. 2. A 4' wide path from the alley to the entrance of the ADU shall be provided. If there is a fence between the ADU and the alley,a gate shall be provided,and the path shall lead to the gate. If the ADU is located within 15 feet of two or more public alleys,this requirement shall only apply to one of the alleys. 3. An ADU located on an alley that exists on the recorded plat maps or Atlas Plats of the city but has not been used for vehicular access or is otherwise blocked by encroachments such as fences or vegetation are exempt from this requirement. J. ADU Gross Floor Area: 1. Detached ADU.None may exceed 1,000 square feet in gross floor area,except that a maximum of 1,200 square feet in gross floor area shall be allowed when the subject property: a. Is in a zoning district other than those listed in Chapter 21A.24 of this title; b. Exceeds 12,000 square feet in lot area; or c. Is part of a planned development that includes a minimum of four dwelling units. 2. Internal ADU. There is no maximum gross floor area provided the building complies with all applicable standards in the underlying zoning district. 3. Gross floor area for a detached ADU shall be calculated as follows: a. When the building includes other allowed accessory uses,only the square footage dedicated to the ADU shall be counted. b. When the ADU is on a second level, stairs and required landings providing access to the ADU shall not be counted. c. Loft space with a ceiling height lower than 7 feet within an ADU shall not be counted towards the total square footage of the ADU. d. Basements shall not count towards the maximum gross floor area of the ADU, so long as: i. The basement is only used for storage or a use permitted by section 21A.40.040.E of this chapter; and ii. There is no internal circulation between the ADU and the basement. K. Second Story Windows. Windows on the second story of a detached ADU are prohibited on an exterior wall that is adjacent to a side or rear property line unless: 41 1. The window is a clerestory window where the bottom of the window is at least 6 feet above the finished floor of the second story; 2. The window is on a wall that faces an elevation of the principal building; 3. The window faces and is at least 10 feet from a side or rear property line; 4. The exterior wall is adjacent to an alley; or 5. The window faces a side or rear property line that is adjacent to a property in a zoning district that permits commercial uses or a property that contains a nonresidential use. L. Maximum Building Coverage. Accessory dwelling units are subject to the maximum building and yard coverage requirements of the applicable zoning and overlay districts. M. Building Permit Required. A building permit is required to establish any ADU in the city. All ADUs are required to comply with all adopted applicable codes including but not limited to building, fire, and public utilities. N. Administrative Regulations: the following administrative regulations are intended to provide direction on applying and interpreting the regulations of this chapter. 1. There is no minimum lot size required for an ADU. 2. An ADU does not count towards the density allowed in the underlying zoning district. 3. ADUs that have been approved prior to (date of adoption), as part of a conditional use are considered legal conforming uses and may be modified if the modification complies with the requirements of this section and any other applicable standard of this title. O. Zoning Certificate and Good Landlord Program: 1. A certificate of occupancy for the ADU shall not be issued until a zoning certificate is issued.A zoning certificate may be issued at the same time as the certificate of occupancy. If a certificate of occupancy is not required,the zoning certificate shall be issued prior to the ADU being occupied. 2. If a business license is required for the rental of the ADU,the owner shall be enrolled in the landlord/tenant initiative program as defined in Title 5,"Business Taxes,Licenses And Regulations",of this code prior to issuing a zoning certificate. P. Restrictive Covenant: An ADU that is required to be owner occupied shall have a restrictive covenant filed against the property on which the ADU is located, which restrictive covenant shall include the following information: 1. A description of the primary dwelling and the ADU, including whether the ADU is within the principal structure or a detached structure,the square footage of both the primary dwelling and the ADU,and how off-street parking is allocated between the primary dwelling and the ADU. 2. A statement that the ADU may only be used and occupied in accordance with the applicable regulations adopted in the Salt Lake City Code. 42 3. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office against the subject property. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be provided to the planning division and attached to the building permit record prior to final inspection of the ADU. If no final inspection is required,the copy of the recorded covenant shall be provided prior to occupying the ADU. Q. Use Regulations: 1. An ADU shall not be rented as a short term rental as defined in Section 21.A.62.040. 2. An ADU may include any home occupation authorized by this title. 3. An ADU may be converted to any other accessory use that is allowed in the zoning district. 4. An ADU cannot be converted to another principal use. SECTION 9.Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.60.020. That Section 2IA.60.020 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: List of Terns: List of Defined Terms)shall be and hereby is amended to add the following terms in the list of defined terms to be inserted into that list in alphabetical order: Atlas, 5-acre, and 10-acre plats. Balcony. Bike lane. Bike path. Deck. Dwelling, accessory unit(internal). Footprint. Non-residential use. Porch. Rooftop patio. Short tern rental. Transit route. Uplighting. SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section 2 IA.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: 43 a. Amending the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU)." That the definition of"DWELLING,ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU)" shall be amended to read as follows: DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (ADU): A type of accessory use that includes a residential unit located on the same lot as a separate principal use, either within the principal structure or within a separate accessory structure. The accessory dwelling unit shall be a complete housekeeping unit with a shared or separate entrance, and separate kitchen, sleeping area, closet space, and bathroom facilities. b. Amending the definition of"BUILDING COVERAGE." That the definition of "BUILDING COVERAGE" shall be amended to read as follows: BUILDING COVERAGE: That percentage of the lot covered by principal or accessory buildings, including cantilevered portions of the building. c. Adding the definition of"ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS." That the definition of"ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: ATLAS, 5-ACRE, AND 10-ACRE PLATS: a map depicting the subdivisions of land within the City. These plats are a scheme of how the City was originally laid out. The City started with plats A through L, Salt Lake City Survey. As the City expanded its boundaries, 5 acre and 10 acre Big Field Survey Plats were added and then the numbered plats 1 through 76. They show information about streets, public right of ways and, some private right of ways. d. Adding the definition of`BALCONY." That the definition of"BALCONY"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: BALCONY: An elevated floor space projecting beyond the exterior walls of a building that is not supported on the ground by posts, columns, or similar supporting structural elements. A balcony shall not be used as a means for entry into a building. 44 e. Adding the definition of"BIKE LANE." That the definition of"BIKE LANE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: BIKE LANE: a division of a road for use by cyclists marked off with painted lines or other means. f. Adding the definition of"BIKE PATH." That the definition of"BIKE PATH"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: BIKE PATH: a path or road for bicycles and not motor vehicles. May include paths that also allow pedestrian or equestrian access. g. Adding the definition of"DECK." That the definition of"DECK"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: DECK: A platform sitting above finished grade and supported on the ground. h. Adding the definition of"DWELLING,ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED)." That the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED)"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (DETACHED): An accessory dwelling unit located wholly within a structure that is accessory to the principal use and buildings on a lot or parcel. i. Adding the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL)." That the definition of"DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL)"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: DWELLING, ACCESSORY UNIT (INTERNAL): An accessory dwelling unit created: 1. within a primary dwelling; 2. within the footprint of a primary dwelling at the time the internal accessory dwelling unit is created; and 3. for the purpose of offering a long-term rental of 30 consecutive days or longer. 45 j. Adding the definition of"FOOTPRINT." That the definition of"FOOTPRINT"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: FOOTPRINT: The measurement of lot area covered by a building, including cantilevered portions of the building. k. Adding the definition of"NON-RESIDENTIAL USE." That the definition of"NON- RESIDENTIAL USE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: NON-RESIDENTIAL USE: lands, buildings or structures or portions thereof used or designed or intended for uses other than a residential use, including,but not limited to, commercial, industrial and institutional uses. 1. Adding the definition of"PORCH." That the definition of"PORCH"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: PORCH: An unenclosed structure attached to a building, covered by a separate roof, and providing access to an entrance to a building. Similar structures providing access to an entrance other than the primary entrance shall be considered a covered deck when located on a platform that is more than two feet(2') above finished grade. in. Adding the definition of"ROOFTOP PATIO." That the definition of"ROOFTOP PATIO"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: ROOFTOP PATIO: A portion of a flat roof that is dedicated to occupiable space, or a deck sitting atop a roof. n. Adding the definition of"SHORT TERM RENTAL." That the definition of"SHORT TERM RENTAL"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: 46 SHORT TERM RENTAL: The use of a dwelling unit or units that are offered for rent or lease for a period less than 30 days. o. Adding the definition of"TRANSIT ROUTE." That the definition of"TRANSIT ROUTE"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: TRANSIT ROUTE: a route over which a public transit vehicle travels and that is specifically labeled or numbered for the purpose of picking up and dropping off passengers at regularly scheduled stops and intervals. p. Adding the definition of"UPLIGHTING." That the definition of"UPLIGHTING"be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: UPLIGHTING: Lights that have been designed to throw illumination upward. SECTION 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 202 . CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. 47 MAYOR CITY RECORDER SEAL APPROVED AS TO FORM* Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Bill No. of 202 . Date: Nove ber 1 2022 Published: By: Pa I C.Mielson enior City Attorney *Subject to the adoption date highlighted Ordinance amending ADU regulations(final) in Section 8 being updated before publication. 48 4. MEMORANDUM TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 49 Q_ NO ICY MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS To: Amy Barry,Chair Salt Lake City Planning Commission Cc: Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer,Blake Thomas,Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director;Michaela Oktay,Deputy Planning Director From: Nick Norris,Planning Director Date: MaY5,2022 Re: Planning Commission petition initiation to modify the Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations On February 9,2022 the Salt Lake City Planning Division voted to initiate a zoning text amendment that would change the accessory dwelling units from conditional uses to permitted uses across all zoning districts where the use is allowed. The motion the Planning Commission adopted was stated as: I move that the Planning Commission initiate a petition to update the ADU regulations of the city in order to make all ADUs permitted uses and make other necessary changes to do so, including changes to comply with Utah Code changes adopted in 2021 and clarifying applicable standards so they can be administered as permitted uses This memo serves as a record of that decision and will be used to start the process of drafting a proposal that would accomplish the intent of this motion. By signing the document as the chair of the Planning Commission,you are acknowledging that the item was listed on the Feb 9,2022 Planning Commission agenda,that the commission discussed the proposal,and that a motion passed by the Planning Commission initiating the zoning text amendment. Please contact me at 8ol-535-6173 or nick.norris<a)slcgov.com if you have any questions.Thank you. Co ' sion Chair Date SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 406 WVWV.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 50 5. PUBLIC COMMENT 51 ERIC VALCHUIS 1587 S 1500 E,Salt Lake City,UT 84105 1 1 Michael McNamee Salt Lake City Planning 451 South State Street// Room 406 Salt Lake City,UT 84111-5480 michael.mcnamee ckslcgov.com RE: Support of the revised Salt Lake City ADU Ordinance Dear Michael, My name is Eric Valchuis and I am writing to support the revised ADU Ordinance which will promote stable homeownership,increase the supply of reliable rental housing,and reduce automobile reliance.To amplify these outcomes,I further encourage the Planning Commission to strike the owner requirement and increase the maximum ADU square footage in the revised ordinance. ADUs are beneficial for cities,homeowners, and renters,an assertion backed up through work I have completed alongside the Terner Center and the Center for Community Innovation (CCI) at UC Berkeley on ADU adoption,zoning,and finance.ADUs are an excellent way of adding density to cities, especially those like Salt Lake City that are dominated by single-family zoning.By increasing density in areas closer to amenities,vehicle miles traveled may be reduced.Many homeowners rent out their ADUs to generate a rental income stream to increase their financial stability. Others rent to family members,caretakers,or friends, increasing quality of life.In building ADUs,homeowners increase the supply of housing which,at the aggregate,can reduce the cost of housing—an important task given the findings of the City's recent Thriving in Place study.ADUs are often built in higher wealth areas but more often rented at affordable levels,giving lower-income families the opportunity to live in wealthier areas which has been shown to improve childhood outcomes.' I applaud Salt Lake for having taken steps,and continuing to take steps,to reform codes to lower the barriers to ADU construction.Permitting ADUs on residential and non-residential properties,as would be allowed in the revised ordinance,is an especially forward-leaning provision.The absence of lot size minimums and lenient parking requirements are also hallmarks of an exemplary ADU code. However,there remain shortcomings in the revised ordinance that limit the potential positive impacts that ADUs can have on the city. Most importantly,the owner occupancy requirement increases renter instability;if a homeowner vacates the property,whether by choice or necessity,then the tenant will also be forced to move. Given the city's housing crisis,we know that there are"very limited,if any,housing options available to low-income households after they are displaced.As a result [displaced] families are likely to either leave the city,double up with other households, enter into homelessness,or move out of the region or even state."z Further,the owner occupancy requirement will limit the numbers of ADUs built. Per the ADU Scorecard,a study published by CCI,an owner occupancy requirement"hinders financial viability for homeowners who need the rental income,or have constraints that prohibit them from living on-site." Given the negative impacts 1 ADUs in wealthier areas:Chapple,Karen,David Garcia,Eric Valchuis,and Julian Tucker "Reaching California's ADU Potential:Progress to Date and the Need for ADU Finance"Center for Community Innovation and the Temer Center for Housing Innovation:University of California, Berkeley,August 2020 htto://ternercenter berkeleg edu/uploads/Reaching Califomias ADU Potential 2020 1 Rdf Unit affordability:Jake Wegmann&Karen Chapple(2014) Hidden density in single family neighborhoods:Backyard cottages as an equitable smart growth strategy,Journal of Urbanism:International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability,7:3,307-329,DOI: 10 1080/17549175 2013 879453 See table 3 Opportunity for children:https://opportunityinsights org/neighborhoods/ 2"Phase One Summary Report,Thriving in Place:Salt Lake City's Anti-Displacement Strategy July 2022 https://urban-displacement github io/edr- ut/slc edr report/ 52 ERIC VALCHUIS 1587 S 1500 E,Salt Lake City,UT 84105 1 1 on tenant stability and the number of potential ADUs that would be built, section CA. of the revised ordinance should be removed. Secondly,maximum gross floor areas impede the utility of ADUs.The revised ordinance allows for a detached ADU of up to 720 square feet,with limited exceptions. Given typical apartment layouts,720 square feet can accommodate up to one bedroom. For many homeowners and many properties,this is an appropriate number of bedrooms.For other homeowners and properties,this square footage limitation is unnecessarily burdensome.Many homeowners use their ADU to house their grown children and their families or their aging parents and their caretakers. For these situations,a one-bedroom unit is insufficient. One-bedroom apartments are also not the unit-size most in need in Salt Lake City.'To allow homeowners to construct apartments with at least two bedrooms,the detached ADU maximum gross floor area (Section K.1.) should be increased from 720 to 1,000 square feet. Salt Lake City is rising to the challenge to meet its housing crisis.Adopting the revised ordinance,with the owner occupancy and maximum square footage provisions removed and revised,respectively,is another bold step that the Commission can take. Best regards, 2:;41, Eric Valchuis a Ibid The housing crisis is most severe for families,including married couples with children and single parents with children 53 From: To: Planning Public Comments Subject: (EXTERNAL)ADU Amendment comments for the meeting tonight Date: Wednesday,September 14,2022 10:36:35 AM I support more ADU's and making it easier for residents to build them, I agree with most of the requirements but have some concerns about owner occupancy. I understand the issues with enforcement and also the financing issue but other cities have dealt with those issues in positive and creative ways, like working with financial institutions or subsidizing loans, one even allows a 2 year"break" in the requirement. Owner occupancy could be kept now and then re-addressed in a couple of years to allow time to see how it works. If owner occupancy is not approved then there should be resident occupancy rates (2 for a one bedroom and 3 non-related, 4 related for a 2 bedroom ADU). This needs to be enforced with fines for the landlords if they don't comply. Enforcement of maintenance both inside and outside the dwelling(s) must also be taken more seriously. The decline of properties, including landscaping, and too many residents packed into a rental, is detrimental to the neighborhood and our property values. Owners tend to take care of their properties where landlords and developers/investors are typically only concerned with collecting the rent. My experience is that code enforcement can decide whether or not to enforce code. I know that the cost of hiring enforcement officers may not be in the budget so residents need to step up and report issues in their neighborhood. Education and reminders about how to report issues could be done with regular participation from Code Enforcement in the Community Council meetings (much like we do with Police and Fire). This would allow residents to escalate issues if they don't see action on a problem they reported. I would like to see a requirement that the design of a detached ADU matches or complements the exterior of the existing home and not allow"raw" shipping containers or cheap materials. Again, this is to keep the culture of the neighborhoods intact and to maintain property values for homeowners. Yvonne Martinez 54 SLC NEIGHBORS 1,0:::JFOR MORE NEIGHBORS September 14, 2022 Michael McNamee, Principal Planner Salt Lake City Planning Division Dear Michael, It is my pleasure to submit this letter on behalf of SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors. We're a newly formed network of SLC neighbors working for housing that is affordable for all income levels through policies that are pro-housing and pro-tenant. We support the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Code Changes'm_;, because ADUs are an important part of Salt Lake City's housing future. While they are not a silver bullet that can fully meet all of SLC's housing needs, they are a critical part of establishing neighborhood scale infill housing and affordable units. As a simple and affordable option for many people, these units can provide much needed workforce housing, housing for students, and for aging parents. ADUs are also a way to build wealth and opportunity in SLC's neighborhoods by providing every homeowner with the opportunity to participate in incremental development of their neighborhoods. The changes proposed by SLC will make ADUs easier to build. We support this policy as a necessary first step toward incremental density and increased housing in every neighborhood in SLC. Thank you, Turner Bitton, Executive Director �, 'j'? -,- SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors 55 PLNPCM2022-00475 - ADU Changes Transmittal Full Packet Final Audit Report 2022-12-09 Created: 2022-12-06 By: Katherine Vuong(katherine.vuong@slcgov.com) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAvHZvW6NmxKHSxJFB K1Kkr1d1-tc9nlM "PLNPCM2022-00475 - ADU Changes Transmittal Full Packet" History Document created by Katherine Vuong (katherine.vuong@slcgov.com) 2022-12-06-9:44:48 PM GMT Document emailed to Orion Goff(orion.goff@slcgov.com)for signature 2022-12-06-9:45:27 PM GMT Email viewed by Orion Goff(orion.goff@slcgov.com) 2022-12-07-4:13:05 AM GMT Email viewed by Orion Goff(orion.goff@slcgov.com) 2022-12-09-9:38:23 PM GMT Document e-signed by Orion Goff(orion.goff@slcgov.com) Signature Date:2022-12-09-9:38:40 PM GMT-Time Source:server Agreement completed. 2022-12-09-9:38:40 PM GMT Powered by F Adobe lC /r' Acrobat Sign Item # C1 .•••• � ' ••-•. MOTION SHEET ,�+= CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY �Fit p, ,,'�����,you��``•''•• TO: City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Budget&Policy Analyst DATE: March 21,2023 RE: $3.5 Million One-time Home Investment Partnership-American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)Funding Annual Action Plan Amendment MOTION 1t—ADOPT I move that the Council adopt a resolution for a substantial amendment to the 2021-2022 HUD Annual Action Plan to include the HOME-ARPA funding and allocation plan. MOTION 2—NOT ADOPT I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 ERIN MENDENHALL ` L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor �' ��� ��� and NEIGHBORHOODS BLAKE THOMAS n Director C 1 .1 �i CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Li E� {Feb A,261��15'�B M5T) Date Received: 02/09/2023 Li sa Shaffer, Chief Administrator Officer Date sent to Council: 02/09/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 9, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community &Neighborhoods lotff 7-- SUBJECT: Substantial Amendment to the Salt Lake City 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan to include the Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan for utilization of The American Rescue Plan Act(ARP), U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD), one-time, supplemental HOME Investment Partnerships Program(HOME), referred to as HOME-ARP, funds in the amount of$3,533,195 for non-congregate shelter, supportive services, or affordable housing for qualified populations. STAFF CONTACT: Tony Milner, Director of the Housing Stability Division 801-535-6168, tony.milner eslcgov.com Heather Royall, Deputy Director of the Housing Stability Division 801-535-7273, heather.royall(kslcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Set the date for a public hearing and approve the included resolution adopting a substantial amendment to the 2021-22 HUD Annual Action Plan to approve and include the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, according to the schedule provided herein. BUDGET IMPACT: $3,533,195 in one-time, supplemental HOME-ARP funds. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Through the American Rescue Plan Act(ARP), Salt Lake City was notified on April 28, 2021, about a one-time, supplemental allocation of U.S. Housing and Urban Development(HUD), HOME Investment Partnerships Program(HOME-ARP) funds in the amount of$3,533,195 for the purpose of non-congregate shelter, affordable housing, Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA), and related supportive services to benefit homeless individuals, individuals at risk of homelessness, individuals fleeing or attempting to flee SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145460,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5460 TEL 801.535.6230 domestic violence, and households at great risk of housing instability. This allocation is separate from and does not affect the City's annual HUD HOME funding. The Administration has determined that substantial amendments to the Salt Lake City 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020-2024 Citizen Participation Plan are not required for the receipt of HOME-ARP funding. However, a substantial amendment to the 2021-22 HUD Annual Action Plan, which was the current Action Plan when the HOME-ARP funding was announced, is required to receive the funding. The purpose of the Substantial Amendment to the 2021-2022 Action Plan is to incorporate a HOME-ARP Allocation Plan(Plan). HUD regulations require submission of the Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and related Substantial Amendment to the Salt Lake City 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan by March 31, 2023. As such, the Administration requests that the City Council: 1. Schedule the following required public hearing: a. February 21, 2023, Public Hearing to review the substantial amendment to the 2021-22 Annual Action Plan to include the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and accept the final draft,pending any final revisions Council may have, of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and hear comments from the public on the Amendment and Plan. 2. Schedule the following work sessions: a. March 7, 2023, first full briefing discussion. b. March 14, 2023, if needed, second briefing discussion. 3. Schedule the formal adoption of the Amendment and Plan: a. March 21, 2023, formal meeting: to potentially adopt the substantial amendment to the 2021-22 Annual Action Plan and final draft, pending any final revisions Council may have, of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan as outlined in the attached resolution. Pursuant to HUD guidelines, the City must engage in consultation and public participation processes and develop the Plan to receive the funds. On February 1, 2022, the Administration presented to the Council an update on the HOME-ARP funds and informed the Council that HUD would be providing additional guidance in the summer of 2022. On October 18, 2022, the Administration presented a preliminary draft plan("Partial Draft Plan") that included a summary of the consultation and public participation processes for the Council's review and feedback. Currently, the Administration has provided a Final Draft of the Plan, refer to Exhibit 1: Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, Final Draft(Final Draft Plan), that includes a comprehensive community assessment; needs assessment, gaps analysis, summary of community outreach, and uses of funding. The Final Draft Plan incorporates feedback and policy direction as provided by the Council, and also incorporates input that has been provided by residents and community partners. Since the Partial Draft Plan was reviewed by Council, changes have been made to the proposed funding allocations as follows: Use of HOME-ARP Funding -Revisions Preliminary Final Draft Draft Plan Plan Supportive Services (Rental Assistance, Case Management, Victim Services, etc.) $753,215.75 $0.00 Acquisition and Development of Non- Congregate Shelters $0.00 $0.00 Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) $0.00 $1,501,608.00 Development of Affordable Rental $2,250,000.00 $1,501,608.00 Housing Non-Profit Operating $0.00 $0.00 Non-Profit Capacity Building $0.00 $0.00 Administration and Planning $529,979.25 $529,979.00 Total HOME ARP Allocation $3,533,195.00 $3,533,195.00 Note: `Rental Assistance"under the "Supportive Services"category is similar to TBRA but with landlord-tenant mediation, eviction prevention services, and housing/tenant-related services as eligible uses of funding. The next step in the process is a public comment period that is currently underway and a public hearing that is proposed to be set for February 21, 2023. Subsequently, on March 21, 2023, the Administration requests that the Council consider the adoption of a resolution,Exhibit 3: Resolution, to approve a substantial amendment to the 2021-22 HUD Annual Action Plan to include the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, pending any final revision the Council may have. Administration's Proposed Use of Funds —Homeless Housing Grant Fund Phase II: As illustrated in the Final Draft Plan, the number of persons experiencing homelessness has increased over recent years, primarily due to instability caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and rising costs in the housing market. Accordingly, there is a need to fund new units of rental housing for persons experiencing homelessness as well as to stabilize households that are at risk of homelessness. First, to add new units of housing, the Administration proposes using funding for the construction or acquisition/rehabilitation of new deeply affordable housing and proposes to prioritize the use of these funds for developments that incorporate mixed-income and family units. Projects shall serve qualified populations, as outlined in the HOME-ARP notice, and will include low-income households that meet HUD's definition of chronically homeless or are otherwise assessed by the region's coordinated entry system as the most vulnerable homeless persons. Due to the limited cash flow generated by these types of housing projects, the Administration recognizes that funding may need to be provided as a deep subsidy or grant. Funding would leverage various other sources of local, state, and federal funds, including the $6 million approved Homeless Housing Grant Fund in FY 2022-23. The $6 million approved in BA3 has been deployed to immediately increase housing units, with available units starting as soon as April of 2023, while the HOME-ARP funds would be available for projects that are further out in the development process. Second, to address the need for rental assistance that will prevent additional individuals and families from falling into homelessness, the Administration proposes using funding for Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA), as allowed under HOME-ARP for qualifying populations. Rental assistance will be essential in helping to transition individuals and families who may still be stabilizing economically from the COVID-19 pandemic, especially as other funding sources for rental assistance end. This funding can be used with one or multiple subrecipient nonprofits in the community. TBRA can be used to fund payments to cover insufficient amounts that the qualifying household cannot pay for housing and housing related costs, such as rental assistance, security deposits, and utilities deposits for qualifying populations. Process Overview: A summary of the process to finalize the Plan, adopt the necessary HUD amendment, and obtain HUD approval for the City's utilization of HOME-ARP is as follows, with this transmittal initiating Steps 3, 4, and 5 of the process: ACTIVITY DETAILS CITY COUNCIL ACTION STEP 1:Initial Initial outreach and assessment,as follows: . N/A Community . Consultation with stakeholders and initial public engagement Outreach and . Needs assessment and gaps analysis Assessment • Initial 15-day public input period:May 22-June 8,2022 (completed) • Housing Stability public hearing:June 1,2022 STEP 2:Partial A Partial Draft Plan,based on the efforts completed in Step 1,is . Transmittal Draft Plan transmitted to Council for a policy discussion. . Policy discussion (completed) . Plan components transmitted: o Summary of available funding o Summary of public engagement o Summary of needs and gaps • Plan components pending additional outreach and policy discussions: o Planned activities(general and not project specific) o Affordable housing production goals(number of units) o Preferences for target populations o Method of awarding funding(RFP,application process, etc.) STEP 3: Complete A Complete Draft Plan,including all of the plan components . Transmittal Draft Plan outlined in Step 2 and incorporating policy direction,is finalized . Consideration of and transmitted to Council.A 30-day minimum public comment adoption after public period is initiated. comment period and public hearing STEP 4:Public During the public comment period in Step 3,the City Council . Public Hearing Hearing shall hold a public hearing. STEP 5:Adoption The Council adopts the Substantial Amendment 2021-2022 • Resolution Annual Action Plan. STEP 6:HUD Housing Stability staff will file the appropriate certifications and • N/A Approval submission to HUD. (upcoming) Eligible Activities: For an activity to be eligible for HOME-ARP, it must align with the following Eligible Uses and Qualifying Populations and have a demonstrated need through the needs assessment, gaps analysis, and community input. Eligible Uses: • Development or rehabilitation and support of affordable housing for qualifying populations. HOME-ARP defines "housing" as including but not limited to manufactured housing, single room occupancy(SRO)units, and permanent supportive housing. Emergency shelters, hotels, motels, facilities such as nursing homes, residential treatment facilities, correctional facilities, halfway houses, and housing for students or dormitories do not constitute housing in the HOME-ARP program. HOME-ARP funds may be used to acquire and rehabilitate such structures into HOME-ARP rental housing. HOME definition, permanent with a lease. • Acquisition and development of non-congregant shelter units,which may be converted to permanent housing or permanent affordable housing, used as emergency shelter, or left as non-congregant emergency shelter. • Tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA). • Supportive service, for organizations carrying out HOME-ARP activities, to qualifying individuals, including housing counseling and homeless prevention services. Qualifying Populations: • Individuals or households that are or are at-risk of experiencing homelessness, or • People who are fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, stalking, sexual assault, or human trafficking, or • Populations for whom supportive services would prevent the family's homelessness or having a high risk of housing instability, or • Households with a veteran family member that meets one of the above criteria. COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT &ALLOCATION PLAN: To target the HOME-ARP funds to the unique needs of recipient communities, HUD required all recipients to undertake an in- depth community assessment, including engaging in consultation and a public participation process, conducting a needs inventory and gap analysis,prior to the development and submission of the Plan for approval. The Plan developed by the City must be influenced by the findings of the community assessment, in order to be approved by HUD. The Administration conducted this in-depth community assessment to evaluate the gaps and unmet needs in Salt Lake City, related to the HOME-ARP qualifying populations, eligible activities, and services, in accordance with the HUD HOME-ARP regulations. HUD has authorized access to, and use of 5% of a recipient's total award for up-front Administrative and Planning purposes. Once Salt Lake City's HOME-ARP Plan is approved by HUD, the remaining award will be made available to the City. All funds must be used by September 30, 2030. To facilitate the City's HOME-ARP community engagement and assessment process and development of an Allocation Plan, Housing Stability contracted the services of Zions Public Financing Inc. (ZPFI), who surveyed community partners, collected housing and homelessness related data, and helped prepare the Community Assessment reports and initial Draft Plan. Housing Stability was able to contract ZPFI with funds budgeted for FY 21-22, in anticipation of HUD requiring such assessments. COMMITMENT OF FUNDS: The Administration, through Housing Stability, will administer the HOME-ARP funds, and staff will continue to communicate with the City Council about the HOME-ARP allocation process. Funds will be committed through a competitive application. A competitive application process could follow the traditional HOME funding allocation process, including reviews and recommendations of applications by a Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Board(CDCIP), then the Mayor, and then the Council for final approval. The City has and will continue to collaborate with Salt Lake County, the State of Utah, and the RDA to enhance the impact of HOME-ARP funds within the community. The priorities of the City Council, Mayor's Office, and City's Homeless Engagement and Resource Team(HEART) will also continue to be considered throughout this process. HOME-ARP can be committed through the following options to develop or rehabilitate affordable housing: grant, amortized loan, forgivable loan, surplus cash loan, or deferred payment loan. HOME-ARP funds used as TBRA can be provided as a loan or a grant. PROPOSED SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT: Due to the City's allocated HOME-ARP funding a substantial amendment is required for the adopted 2021-22 Annual Action Plan, to include a HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. (Note: HUD guidance outlines that a substantial amendment to the City's 2020-24 HUD Consolidated Plan is not required for the HOME-ARP funds.) HUD REQUIREMENTS HUD's Substantial Amendment Section 24 CFR 91.505 (b), outlines the criteria for Substantial Amendment and states "the jurisdiction shall identify in its Citizen Participation Plan the criteria it will use for determining what constitutes a Substantial Amendment. It is these Substantial Amendments that are subject to a citizen participation process, in accordance with the jurisdiction's citizen participation plan." SALT LAKE CITY 2020-2024 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS Salt Lake City's Consolidated Plan for 2020-2024 Citizen Participation Plan defines a Substantial Amendment as: 1. A proposed use of funds that does not address a goal or underlying strategy identified in the governing Consolidated Plan or Annual Action Plan; or 2. Increasing funding levels for a given project by 100% or more of the previously adopted amount; or 3. Decreasing funding levels for a given project by 100%AND pivoting impacted funds to another approved use during an action plan period; or 4. A change to a regulatory requirement or additional allocated funding from the US Department of Housing &Urban Development that defines that a Substantial Amendment must be completed. Substantial Amendment to 2021-22 Annual Action Plan: Accept Additional Allocations of Funding and Include the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan The City's 2021-22 Annual Action Plan's funding allocations were approved through Resolution No. 14 of 2021, an appropriations resolution adopting the One-Year Annual Action Plan for 2021-2022, which includes HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Based on HUD Notice CPD-21-10, issued September 13, 2021,Requirements for the Use of Funds in the HOME-American Rescue Plan Programs, Section V. HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, a Substantial Amendment is required to accept the HOME-ARP. These funds represent an additional allocation of funding from HUD to Salt Lake City's approved 2021-22 Annual Action Plan. The City's 2021-22 Annual Action Plan will be amended to include the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, which identifies the additional funding and outlines the proposed uses of the grant funds. (Note: The HOME-ARP funds were allocated to the City April 28, 2021, and HUD requires that the HUD program year at time of final guidance be amended.) PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: The first Public Comment Period was a hybrid meeting held May 22, 2022, through June 8, 2022, with an Administration Public Hearing hosted by Housing Stability on June 1, 2022. There were no comments received during the public comment period or related public hearing. This Public Comment Period was an opportunity for the public to review and give feedback on a draft of the HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan. (Note: HUD requires the Administration to conduct annual HUD General Needs Hearings to receive feedback from the public on the City's current Consolidated Plan needs and goals. These hearings are publicly noticed, are open and public meetings, and members of the Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board are invited to assist with the hearings. Received public feedback is then summarized in the City's HUD Annual Action Plans. Guidance from HUD on the HOME-ARP funds required the Administration to hold two Public Hearings related to the HOME-ARP funds; one during the development of the draft HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan to receive feedback and another on the final draft Plan, to receive feedback and assist with the final decision.) A second Public Comment Period will be held February 5, 2023, through March 21, 2023,with a Public Hearing on February 21, 2023 to finalize the Plan and related Substantial Amendments. After this period, received public comments will be reviewed and included in the final submission of the Community Assessment and Allocation Plan to HUD. All Public Comment Period and Public Hearing Notices are posted in English and Spanish on the State's Public Notice website, printed in a newspaper of general circulation, sent to community partners to post, and provided to the Mayor's Office and the Council Office for dissemination on social media platforms and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. Please see Exhibit 2 for a Summary of Public Comments. COORDINATION WITH COMMUNITY PARTNERS: Salt Lake City has worked closely with Salt Lake County, the State of Utah and other community partners to ensure funds will be strategically targeted to reach HOME-ARP qualifying populations. Community Partners include: • HUD Regional Office, • State and County HOME-ARP grantees, • The Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness and the Salt Lake County Continuum of Care, • National homeless and affordable housing consultants and advocacy groups. NEXT STEPS: Once adopted by the Council, the Administration will submit the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan to HUD as a substantial amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan for HUD's review and acceptance to fully award HOME-ARP funding to Salt Lake City. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1. Salt Lake City's HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan, Final Draft Plan Exhibit 2. Summary of Public Comments Exhibit 3. Resolution EXHIBIT 1: Salt Lake City's HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan,Final Draft Plan SALT LAKE CITY HOME-ARP ALLOCATION PLAN MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL CITY COUNCIL VICTORIA PETRO, VICE CHAIR ALEJANDRO PUY CHRIS WHARTON ANA VALDEMOROS DARIN MANO, CHAIR DAN DUGAN AMY FOWLER Prepared by S A L T L A K E C I T Y HOUSING STABILITY DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBHORHOODS 1 Table of Contents Tableof Contents.........................................................................................................................................2 Consultation.................................................................................................................................................4 PublicParticipation...................................................................................................................................14 Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis......................................................................................................16 HOME-ARP Activities..............................................................................................................................25 HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals.................................................................................................27 Preferences.................................................................................................................................................29 ReferralMethods.......................................................................................................................................31 Limitations in a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project..............................................................32 2 Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Template with Guidance Instructions: All guidance in this template, including questions and tables, reflect requirements for the HOME-ARP allocation plan, as described in Notice CPD-21-10: Requirements of the Use of Funds in the HOME-American Rescue Plan Program, unless noted as optional. As the requirements highlighted in this template are not exhaustive,please refer to the Notice for a full description of the allocation plan requirements as well as instructions for submitting the plan, the SF-424, SF-424B, SF-424D, and the certifications. References to "the ARP"mean the HOME-ARP statute at section 3205 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-2). 3 Consultation In accordance with Section VA of the Notice (page 13), before developing its HOME ARP allocation plan, at a minimum, a PJ must consult with: • CoC(s) serving the jurisdiction's geographic area, • homeless service providers, • domestic violence service providers, • veterans'groups, • public housing agencies (PHAs), • public agencies that address the needs of the qualifying populations, and • public or private organizations that address fair housing, civil rights, and the needs of persons with disabilities. State PA are not required to consult with every PHA or CoC within the state's boundaries; however, local PJs must consult with all PHAs (including statewide or regional PHAs) and CoCs serving the jurisdiction. Participating Jurisdiction: Salt Lake City Date: 3/16/2022 Describe the consultation process including methods used and dates of consultation: This HOME-ARP allocation plan was prepared in consultation with agencies and service providers whose clientele include the HOME-ARP qualifying populations (QPs). QPs include: • Individuals or households that are currently homeless or are at-risk of experiencing homelessness, or • People who are fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, or • Populations for whom supportive services would prevent the family's homelessness or having a high risk of housing instability, or • Households with a veteran family member that meets one of the above criteria. A wide variety of agencies serve the needs of QPs, including,but not limited to, entities that focus on homeless services, veterans' groups, individuals with disabilities,persons facing violence and abuse, and those offering mental health services. On the front lines daily, these entities have provided invaluable insights and data for inclusion in this allocation plan and provide the foundation of our allocation plan analysis. In order to receive as much input as possible from the QPs, a survey was provided to 79 entities (listed below) to identify unmet needs and gaps in facilities and services, as well as to solicit feedback from these agencies on identifying HOME-ARP eligible activities currently taking place in their jurisdiction. A cover letter explaining the purpose of the survey and the importance of each entity's feedback, signed by representatives from Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County, was also sent with the 4 survey. The survey was conducted from January 24, 2022, through February 25, 2022, with follow-up phone calls and e-mails sent to non-responsive entities after that time period. In some cases, follow-up interviews took place in order to gather more data and a deeper understanding of current needs—especially unmet needs. The survey response rate was approximately 42%. All CoCs, PHAs, Domestic Violence Service Providers, and Veteran Services responded to the survey. A brief summary of responding organizations and the comments received are shown in the table below. In addition to the survey responses, extensive research and data was gathered regarding homelessness, populations at risk of homelessness, veterans, and persons attempting to flee situations of violence (domestic, dating, sexual assault, human trafficking, etc.). Major data sources used include: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS), local point-in- time counts (PIT), CoC data, South Valley Services (Sanctuary), YWCA,Utah Community Action and United States Census data. List the organizations consulted: Agency/Or g Type of Agency/Org Method of consulted Consultation Feedback Advantage Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless— Services, Inc. Veterans' Group, Individual or Family. Organization Serving Persons with disabilities Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing is lack of affordable housing. Alliance House Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Organization Serving Homelessness. Persons with Disabilities Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in housing are truly affordable housing. TheSoap2Hope Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Fleeing, or Human Trafficking Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). 5 Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in housing/shelter are safety, openings, crisis undisclosed shelter for victims, trauma informed services. Shelters are understaffed and overwhelmed. We need HOME-ARP funding in areas where the population can access resources without barriers. Department of Government Entity, Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Workforce Services Services for Low Income Homelessness. Families/Individuals, Families/Individuals at Preferred use of funds is for Risk of Homelessness Acquisition Development of Non- Congregate Shelter Units. Organization Comments: Need available affordable housing. Assist Inc. Fair Housing Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Organization, Homelessness. Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in services is permanent supportive services and case management for persons experiencing homelessness. Family Support Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless Center Domestic Violence —Individual and Family. Survivors, Human Trafficking Survivors, Preferred use of funds is for Families/Individuals at Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Risk of Homelessness Building Assistance. Organization Comments: 6 Greatest gap in housing/shelter is for family sober living. Greatest gap in services is mental health care providers. Journey of Hope, Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Inc. Domestic Violence Homelessness. Services, Human Trafficking Services, Preferred use of funds is for the Organization Serving Creation of Affordable Rental Persons with Housing. Disabilities. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is not enough DV/SA trafficking beds on the Wasatch Front. Family Promise Homeless Services Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless Salt Lake —Individual or Family. Preferred use of funding is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Housing Authority Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of of Salt Lake City Domestic Violence Homelessness. Services, Veterans' Group, Fair Housing Preferred use of funds is for Organization, Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Organization Serving Building Assistance. Persons with Disabilities, Organization Comments: Families/Individuals at The greatest gap to Risk of Homelessness housing/shelter is affordable accessible housing with limited qualifying restrictions. State of Utah, Government Entity, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless- Office of Homeless Homeless Services Individual or Family. Services Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition/Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. 7 YWCA Utah Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Fleeing, or Domestic Violence Attempting to Flee (Domestic Services, Human Violence, Dating Violence, Trafficking Services Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Utah Community Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Fleeing, or Action Families/Individuals at Attempting to Flee (Domestic Risk of Homelessness Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. The Road Home Homeless Services Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless- Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is the extreme lack of deeply affordable housing stock. This deficit leads to reduced shelter outflow and means we are able to serve fewer people with emergency shelter and housing. Fourth Street Clinic Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Healthcare Provider Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Acquisition/Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. 8 Asian Association Refugee &Immigrant Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of of Utah Service Provider Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. First Step House Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Veterans' Group, Individual or Family. Substance Use Disorder and Mental Health Preferred use of funds is for the Treatment, Organization Creation of Affordable Rental Serving Persons with Housing. Disabilities Organization Comments: Many of the homeless and chronically homeless concurrently struggle with co- occurring and chronic mental health conditions that will not ever resolve. Our systems must realign to support these individuals over long periods of time, in some cases indefinitely. Veterans Affairs Veteran Services Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - SLC Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in needed housing/shelter are in the aging population- over age 55. We are seeing an alarming rate of seniors being displaced from their homes. They do not have the ability to increase their income based on their age. We need more affordable senior housing. 9 Disability Law Civil Rights Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Center Organization, Fair Homelessness. Housing Organization, Organization Serving Preferred use of funds is for Persons with Disabilities Supportive Services. Rape Recovery Domestic Violence Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Center Services, Human Individual or Family. Trafficking Services Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: Non-profit organizations need capacity building dollars. Crossroads Urban Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Center Families/Individuals at Homelessness. Risk of Homelessness Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Focus on deeply targeted affordable housing and Permanent Supportive Housing. Helping Hand Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Association - DBA Organization Serving Individual or Family. The Haven Persons with Disabilities Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. The INN Between Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Healthcare Provider Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is access to appropriate services to obtain the very limited housing available. Lack of seasonal shelters. 10 Utah Domestic Domestic Violence Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Violence Coalition Services, Human Homelessness. Trafficking Services Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition/Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in needed services is flexible funding to help remove barriers for survivors of violence to gain access to housing or maintain their current housing. NeighborWorks of Low-Income Home Survey Highest unmet need is Fleeing, or Salt Lake Buyer Assistance Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in needed services is for mental health, substance abuse, affordable healthcare access in general. Salt Lake Valley Low-Income Home Survey Highest unmet need is Families Habitat for Buyer Assistance, seeking stable housing. Humanity Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. Clean Slate Utah Low Income Legal Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. 11 211/United Way of Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - SLC Domestic Violence Individual or Family. Services, Human Trafficking Services, Preferred use of funds is for Civil Rights Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Organization, (TBRA). Organization Serving Persons with Organization Comments: Disabilities, The greatest gap in Families/Individuals at housing/shelter is tenant choice Risk of Homelessness housing vouchers that reflect current cost of local average rent and not based on prior year domestic rent values. Also, the aging population is rapidly facing homelessness due to fixed income/retirement no longer keeping pace with senior housing voucher values. Salt Lake City Homeless Services, Food Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Mission Pantry Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. 12 Department of Government Entity Survey Highest unmet need is At Risk of Health and Human Homelessness. Services Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: The greatest gaps in needed housing/shelter are too many restrictive conditions and definitions. Hard to find information on certain programs and website information being incorrect with no response to inquiry's online about programs by staff. We do not have enough special housing programs with services for people with disabilities. Shelter the Homeless Services Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Homeless Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is deeply affordable housing, non- congregate shelter. Greatest gap in services is in case management and medical support. West Valley City Housing Authority, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Housing Authority Domestic and Other Individual or Family. Violence Services, Fair Housing Organization, Preferred use of funds is for Organization Serving Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Persons with (TBRA). Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Organization Comments: Risk of Homelessness Greatest gap in housing/shelter is the lack of affordable, safe, and decent rental units. 13 Public Housing Housing Authority, Survey Highest unmet need is Homeless - Authority DBA Domestic and Other Unaccompanied Youth under 25 Housing Connect Violence Services, Years of Age. Veterans' Group, Fair Housing Organization, Preferred use of funds is for the Organization Serving Creation of Affordable Rental Persons with Housing. Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Organization Comments: Risk of Homelessness Greatest gap in housing/shelter is deeply affordable housing. Greatest gap in services is supportive services that focus on housing retention. Salt Lake City and Homeless Services, Survey Highest unmet need is Salt Lake County Government Entity, Homeless - Individual or Family. CoC - Salt Lake Families/Individuals at Valley Coalition to Risk of Homelessness Preferred use of funds is for the End Homelessness Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap is housing - 2,950 housing units now and 1,400 additional units annually. Shelter- 450+ overflow shelter beds. Greatest gap in services is in case management and behavioral health. Summarize feedback received and results of upfront consultation with these entities: The feedback received is backed up by the data researched and forms the basis for our allocation of HOME-ARP funds. Specifically, our allocation plan prioritizes the gaps described by survey respondents and identified in the data. The major unmet eligible needs described by respondents include creation of deeply affordable rental housing and supportive services for the qualifying populations of individuals or families experiencing homelessness, at risk of homelessness, and domestic violence victims. Public Participation In accordance with Section V.B of the Notice (page 13), PJs must provide for and encourage citizen participation in the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan. Before submission of the plan, PJs must provide residents with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed HOME-ARP allocation plan of no less than 15 calendar days. The PJ must follow 14 its adopted requirements for "reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment"for plan amendments in its current citizen participation plan. In addition, PJs must hold at least one public hearing during the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan and prior to submission. PJs are required to make the following information available to the public: • The amount of HOME ARP the PJ will receive, and • The range of activities the PJ may undertake. Throughout the HOME-ARP allocation plan public participation process, the PJ mustfollow its applicable fair housing and civil rights requirements and procedures for effective communication, accessibility, and reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities and providing meaningful access to participation by limited English proficient(LEP) residents that are in its current citizen participation plan as required by 24 CFR 91.105 and 91.115. Describe the public participation process, including information about and the dates of the public comment period and public hearing(s) held during the development of the plan: • Date(s) of public notice: 512212022 • Public comment period:start date- 512212022 end date- 61812022 • Date(s) of public hearing: 61112022 • Date(s) of public notice: 21712023 • Public comment period:start date-21712023 end date - 312112023 • Date(s) of public hearing: 212112023 Describe the public participation process: Salt Lake City will conduct two public comment periods and public hearings, one during the creation of the plan from May 22, 2022, to June 8, 2022, and another to be completed after Council review. The public hearing on June 1, 2022, had no attendees. There were no public comments during the first comment period. The draft allocation plan was available on the Salt Lake City Housing Stability website for any person to view and comment on. The public notice can be found here and is an attachment to this plan. More information will be included after the second public hearing. Describe efforts to broaden public participation: The notice of the public comment period and public hearing is posted in the local newspaper, online at Salt Lake City Housing Stability's webpage, and through City Council postings. The posting was available in English and Spanish as well as ADA compliant. Summarize the comments and recommendations received through the public participation process either in writing, or orally at a public hearing: There were no public comments received during the public comment period from May 22, 2022, to June 8, 2022, and no attendees of the public hearing on June 1, 2022. More information will be included after the second public comment period. 15 Summarize any comments or recommendations not accepted and state the reasons why: There were no comments nor recommendations not accepted by Salt Lake City. Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis In accordance with Section V.C.1 of the Notice (page 14), a PJ must evaluate the size and demographic composition of all our of the qualifying populations within its boundaries and assess the unmet needs of each of those populations. If the PJ does not evaluate the needs of one of the qualifying populations, then the PJ has not completed their Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis. In addition, a PJ must identify any gaps within its current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system. A PJ should use current data, including point in time count, housing inventory count, or other data available through CoCs, and consultations with service providers to quanta the individuals and families in the qualifying populations and their need for additional housing, shelter, or services. Homeless Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table Homeless Current Inventory Homeless Population Gap Analysis F ity Adults Only Vets Family Adult Vets Victims F ity Adults Only #of #of #of #of #of HH(at HH of DV #of #of #of #of Beds Units Beds Units* Beds least 1 (w/o Beds Units Beds Units child) child) Emergency 483 47 862 Not 0 Shelter Avail. Transitional 226 60 136 Not 80 Housing Avail. Permanent Supportive 1,155 333 1,394 Not Avail. 622 Housing16 Other Permanent o 0 0 0 Housing Sheltered 634 1,055 73 329 Homeless Unsheltered o 268 7 26 Homeless Current Gap 1,230 Not 1,069 Not Avail. Avail. Data Source:CoC Housing Inventory Count(HIC)and Point in Time Count(PIT)(2020) Although there is an aggregate surplus of family and adult shelter beds, according to the above table, there is a difference with each population. For example, there are 1,323 adults experiencing homelessness in Salt Lake City and 862 beds available for immediate need. Transitional and permanent housing may take time to achieve, and a person will have to utilize a shelter bed while waiting on an application to transition or permanent housing. The gap for shelter beds available to families are 151. The gap for adult only shelter beds are 461. It is likely that all permanent supportive housing currently in Salt Lake City is rented at capacity. 16 Housing Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table Non-Homeless Current Inventory Level of Need Gap Analysis #of Units #of Households #of Households Total Rental Units 42,179 Rental units Affordable to HH at 30%AMI(At-Risk of 4,745 Homelessness) Rental units Affordable to HH at 50%AMI(At-Risk of 14,850 Homelessness) 0%-30%AMI Renter HH w/ 1 or more severe housing 6,555 problems(At-Risk of Homelessness) 30%-50%AMI Renter HH w/l or more severe housing 2,380 problems(other populations) Current Gaps 8,935 Data Source:Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS)(2014-2018) The above table shows a surplus of housing units available and affordable to households at 50% AMI. When looking at households at or below 30%AMI there is a significant gap of 1,810 units. This shows the need for deeply affordable rental units for residents at or below 30%AMI. It is likely that the number of households will continue to grow as Salt Lake City population grows over the next five to ten years. Providing more deeply affordable housing will keep up with the continued population growth that Salt Lake City is seeing. Describe the size and demographic composition of qualifying populations within the P.1's boundaries: Within the boundaries of Salt Lake City, we have the following data regarding the HOME-ARP qualifying populations: 1,958 people met the HUD definition of Homeless, residing in local shelters, transitional housing, or unsheltered during the HUD 2020 Point in Time Count. As shown in the table above, there are 7 unsheltered homeless veterans and 73 sheltered homeless veterans. There are 26 unsheltered victims of domestic violence and 329 sheltered victims of domestic violence. Other data received, including 2021 Fall Point in Time Counts indicate an increase in homelessness during the Covid-19 pandemic. The data shows that during Covid-19 unsheltered counts increased significantly. In 2021, the unsheltered PIT count represented approximately 17% of the homeless population. Further, approximately 18% of the homeless population avoided access to shelters due to Covid-19. In addition, the number of unsheltered individuals from 2019-2020 increased by 39%while the overall homeless population only increased by 6.3%. 17 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fall Unsheltered 136 193 268 306 Sheltered 1668 1651 1690 1502 Total 1804 1844 1958 1808 Source: Salt Lake City/Salt Lake County PIT Of concern is the fact that unsheltered unaccompanied youth increased by 121%between 2019 and 2020, although show some decrease in 2021. Population 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fall Persons in Households with Adult(s) and Child(ren) - - - 4 Persons in Households with Only Children 1 - - - Persons in Households with Only Adults 135 193 268 302 Chronically Homeless Individuals 44 86 120 91 Veterans 7 12 7 15 Unaccompanied Youth 9 19 42 8 Persons with HIV 5 1 6 5 Source: Salt Lake City/Salt Lake County PIT According to the 2020 Point in Time Count, the largest demographic of those experiencing homelessness are those people who identify as White at 71%; the second largest demographic are people who identify as Black at 13%. In addition, people identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native represent 5%; Pacific Islanders represent 3%; Asians represent 1%; and multiple races represent 7%. Homeless as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 The total number of emergency shelter beds in Salt Lake City are 1,349 (HIC, 2020). As shown in the table above, the number of homeless individuals is 1,958 (PIT, 2020). This indicates a shortage in emergency shelter beds versus homeless individuals. In addition, 4,166 people became homeless for the first time in 2020. At Risk of Homelessness as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 According to 2014-2018 CHAS data, approximately 76% of the City's cost-burdened households are renters and 60% are severely cost-burdened. According to CHAS data, Salt Lake City has 12,550 households that have an annual income under 30%AMI. This increases the risk of homelessness for those that are trying to maintain their current housing as house prices and rental rates continue to surge at an alarming pace. Median rent in Salt Lake City has increased by nearly 75% from 2000-2019 (2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates). Close to 84% of survey respondents indicated development of rental housing is extremely important to qualifying populations. In addition, 97% stated permanent housing should be expanded to meet the needs of qualifying populations. 18 Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee,Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking, as defined by HUD in the Notice There are two primary domestic violence service providers, South Valley Services (SVS) and YWCA Utah. These organizations serve individuals fleeing, attempting to flee, domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking or human trafficking, as defined by the HUD Notice CPD-21-10. Together, within a one-year period, the two agencies have provided housing, safety and other services to 1,597 individuals that include men, women, and children in the State of Utah. SVS has received 2,217 hotline calls, 923 Lethality Assessment Program(LAP) calls, case-managed 1,007 individuals, and provided therapy to 426 individuals. YCWA served 2,112 individuals by domestic violence programs in the last year. The YWCA had 309 requests for services that could not be met and 48% of those were for housing. There are more data gaps in our Domestic Violence and Human Trafficking data due to more strict confidentiality rules surrounding this qualifying population. Other populations requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness and other populations at greatest risk of housing instability, as defined by HUD in the Notice Other populations include individuals or households experiencing evictions, those earning under 50 percent of AMI, and those living in neighborhoods with low mobility rates. CHAS data indicates there are 22,610 households in Salt Lake City that are below 50%AMI. In the consultation survey, respondents identified lower-income renters and the elderly as especially vulnerable to housing instability due to rising rents and home prices. In conjunction with job losses and unemployment due to the pandemic, as well as a reliance by the elderly on fixed incomes, there is an increasing gap between incomes and housing costs. Service providers indicated an increased need in services, including hotline calls, requests for shelter, eviction prevention, mental health services, medical care, case management and housing supports. Nearly 89% of survey respondents stated homelessness prevention services should be expanded in the regional area to support qualifying populations. Identify and consider the current resources available to assist qualifying populations, including congregate and non-congregate shelter units, supportive services, TBRA, and affordable and permanent supportive rental housing (Optional): According to the 2020 HIC report, the current resources to meet the needs of qualifying populations are as follows: 4,915 total year-round beds which include, 1,712 of emergency, safe haven and transitional housing beds, and 3,203 of permanent housing beds which include permanent supportive housing, rapid re-housing, and other permanent housing. The HIC report specifically identifies 2,199 family beds, 2,711 adult only beds and 5 child only beds. Subsets of the total year-round inventory include 757 beds for veterans, 110 beds for youth and 1,501 beds to serve the chronically homeless. In addition, there are 58 seasonal beds, and 160 overflow/vouchers. Data is not available to distinguish between congregate and non- congregate shelter units. Salt Lake City used motel vouchers to create non-congregate shelter units, currently there are no non-congregant shelters in Salt Lake City. 19 Salt Lake City has made efforts to offer a wide range of services including TBRA, medical/dental services, mental health counseling, domestic violence shelters and counseling, legal aid and resources to identify available affordable housing. In November 2020 the Kern C. Gardner Policy Institute provided a report outlining the current challenges in serving qualifying populations given the existing governance structure and made several recommendations for improvements, including the appointment of a statewide homeless services officer, a homeless council, and a philanthropic consortium. In addition, as reflected in the consultation process, the need for affordable housing is a high priority to service providers and government entities. Describe the unmet housing and service needs of qualifying populations: As discussed in the sections above, the number of unsheltered homeless individuals has increased by 39% from 2019-2020. According to survey respondents, nearly 54% indicated a gap in affordable housing inventory in the regional area. This is also shown in the 2014-2018 CHAS data. As stated, multiple times throughout the consultation process, the need for services has increased and access to these services has become cumbersome for qualifying populations. In addition to limiting barriers to access these services, service providers are in need of qualified staff to assist with providing services and support. As shown in the graph below, survey respondents stated there is a gap in case management services for qualifying populations. While the need for more affordable housing and more case management services was listed as a need for all groups, as shown in the survey responses below, specific needs for the various qualifying populations are listed following the two graphs. Where are the Greatest Gaps in Needed Housing/Shelter for Qualifying Populations? Specific populations including aging Supportive services More dispersed location of shelters and...M Rental assistance Permanent supportive housing M Emergency shelter(beds) Online/hotline housing assistance Non-congregate shelters Affordable housing(deeply affordable) 0 5 10 15 20 20 Where are the Greatest Gaps in Needed Services for Qualifying Populations? Aging populations More staffing Domestic abuse/violence Supportive services for homelessness Housing support/assistance Disabilities Mental health/substance abuse services Medical Case management/continuum of services 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Homeless as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 Over 60 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed to this group of qualifying populations. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Availability of deeply affordable housing for individuals or families • Tenant Based Rental Assistance • Homeless Service Support • Additional Shelter Beds At Risk of Homelessness as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 Around 30 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed to populations at risk of homelessness. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Supportive services and case management services • Affordable Housing Options • Tenant Based Rental Assistance • Aging populations accessing affordable housing Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee,Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking, as defined by HUD in the Notice Over 48 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed this group of qualifying populations. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Crisis shelters for victims • Staffing and Services • Non-congregate shelter options 21 Other populations requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness and other populations at greatest risk of housing instability as defined by HUD in the Notice Approximately 61 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed at other populations requiring services or housing assistance for those at greatest risk of housing instability. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Affordable Housing • Provide Supportive Services Identify any gaps within the current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system: Based on the data provided by the CoC Housing Inventory Count(HIC) and Point in Time Count (2020), there is currently sufficient inventory to match the homeless population, as seen in the above Homeless table. However, this count is a summation of all homeless inventory available to all populations included in the homeless count and does not account for gaps within the total inventory such as needs for specific homeless services and beds. The count also does not include the potential needs for families and individuals at greater risk of homelessness, such as those staying in hotels, doubled up with family, or cars. Those populations may not be counted in some of these numbers and many families under 50%AMI are housing cost burdened,paying over 30% of their income towards rent. Being housing cost burdened increases your likelihood of eviction as one financial emergency can remove the ability to pay rent. The housing inventory gap analysis also shows a surplus in aggregated housing inventory available to households under 50%AMI. However, when only considering households with 0- 30%AMI and the inventory available to these households which are at risk of homelessness, there appears to be a gap of 1,810 units available. This indicates that there is a substantial need in additional affordable housing at the lower level of AMI to better meet the needs of those at risk of homelessness. Under Section IV.4.23i.G of the HOME ARP Notice, a PJ may provide additional characteristics associated with instability and increased risk of homelessness in their HOME- ARP allocation plan. These characteristics will further refine the definition of"other populations"that are "At Greatest Risk of Housing Instability,"as established in the HOME- ARP Notice. If including these characteristics, identify them here: According to CHAS, there are 1,010 households with at least two persons where either one or both are 62 years old or older and have a total household income of less than 50 percent of HAMFI. The Salt Lake School District had a mobility rate of 17.1% among its families in the 2019-2020 school year according to data provided by the Utah State Board of Education. This percentage may have been affected by COVID-19 as the previous 6 school years each had a mobility rate of at least 23.7%. 22 Identify priority needs for qualifying populations: As indicated by the survey results and shown in the graph below, the qualifying population with the highest unmet need is homeless individual or family at 54.04%. Which Qualifying Population has the Highest Unmet Need? Other(please specify) - Fleeing,or Attempting to Flee(Domestic Violence,Dating Violence,Sexual Assault, — Stalking,or Human Trafficking) At Risk of Homelessness Homeless-Unaccompanied Youth under 25 . Years of Age Homeless-Individual or Family 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Next, when asked to rank the preferred use of HOME-ARP funds for qualifying populations, the creation of affordable rental housing ranked the highest with 52.94%. F_ Preferred use of HOME-ARP Funds Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance Acquisition/Development of Non-Congregate — Shelter Units Supportive Services — Tenant-Based Rental Assistance(TBRA) _ Creation of Affordable Rental Housing 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% In addition, when asked whether permanent housing should be expanded to qualifying populations, 97.22% strongly agreed/agreed with the statement. 23 Permanent Housing Should be Expanded to Qualifying Populations Neither agree nor disagree I Agree EMEM" 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Lastly, when survey respondents commented on any other areas related to the eligible use of HOME-ARP that should be considered as a funding priority, 53.57% indicated housing; of those who indicated housing, the following specific types of housing were mentioned: • Deeply targeted affordable housing—20% • Senior housing— 13% • Long-term housing— 13% • Supportive housing—6% • Non-congregate housing—6% • Sustainable housing— 6% To summarize, the data and survey results conclude the qualifying population with the greatest unmet need is homeless individual or family and the priority need suggests affordable housing should be expanded within the regional area. Explain how the PJ determined the level of need and gaps in the PJ's shelter and housing inventory and service delivery systems based on the data presented in the plan: The methodology used in the creation of this HOME-ARP Allocation Plan were derived from various sources, including 2020 and 2021 (Fall) PIT, 2020 HIC, 2014-2018 CHAS,U.S. Census Bureau 2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates and through the consultation process with service providers and government entities. 24 HOME-ARP Activities Describe the method(s)that will be used for soliciting applications for funding and/or selecting developers, service providers, subrecipients and/or contractors: Salt Lake City will solicit applications through a competitive application process. This process will be similar to that of the annual HUD funding Salt Lake City receives. Agencies and developers will be able to apply for funding through an application open for a minimum of thirty days. Eligible projects will then go through the public process which includes going before a public City review board, the Mayor, and City Council for final recommendations and approval. During the process Salt Lake City will outreach and collaborate with non-profit agencies, Other Salt Lake City Divisions, the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake, and other local municipalities to maximize the impact of HOME-ARP funding. Describe whether the PJ will administer eligible activities directly: Salt Lake City will work with a subrecipient or developer to administer the selected activities. Salt Lake City will provide oversight,but will not administer eligible activities directly. If any portion of the PJ's HOME ARP administrative funds are provided to a subrecipient or contractor prior to HUD's acceptance of the HOME ARP allocation plan because the subrecipient or contractor is responsible for the administration of the PJ's entire HOME ARP grant, identify the subrecipient or contractor and describe its role and responsibilities in administering all of the PJ's HOME ARPprogram: This question is not applicable. Salt Lake City Housing Stability has not provided any administrative funds to a subrecipient or contractor. We will provide program oversight and administration of the HOME-ARP funding. While subrecipients will be selected to undertake approved activities, Salt Lake City will not be contracting out the administration of our HOME- ARP grant or program oversight. In accordance with Section V.C.2. of the Notice (page 4), PJs must indicate the amount of HOME-ARP funding that is planned for each eligible HOME-ARP activity type and demonstrate that any planned funding for nonprofit organization operating assistance, nonprofit capacity building, and administrative costs is within HOME-ARP limits. 25 Use of HOME-ARP Funding Funding Amount Percent of the Statutory Grant Limit Supportive Services (Rental Assistance,Case $$0 Management,Victim Services,etc.) Acquisition and Development of Non- $0 Congregate Shelters Tenant Based Rental Assistance(TBRA) $ 1,501,608.00 Development of Affordable Rental Housing $ 1,501,608.00 Non-Profit Operating $0 #% 5% Non-Profit Capacity Building $0 #% 5% Administration and Planning $529,979.00 15% 1 15% Total HOME ARP Allocation $3,533,195 Describe how the PJ will distribute HOME ARP funds in accordance with its priority needs identified in its needs assessment and gap analysis: The survey and data gathered for Salt Lake City identified deeply affordable housing and case management supportive services as a major need and gap. City Council previously approved$176,659.75 as administration funds for Housing Stability to use for the required consultation process and the creation of the allocation plan. Salt Lake City can use up to $529,979.00 for administration and planning costs which can go to Housing Stability staff that have been working on the allocation plan and will continue to administer the HOME-ARP funding until 2030. To address the need for deeply affordable housing, Salt Lake City will fund the development of affordable rental housing in the amount of$1,501,608.00. Salt Lake City will prioritize the use of these funds for developments that incorporate mixed-income and family housing. This funding can be used in conjunction with a current project, as long as federal requirements are adhered to, for acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of affordable rental housing. All HOME units must be set aside for qualifying populations as defined in the HOME-ARP Notice CPD-21-10 to include: individuals or families experiencing homelessness, individuals or families at risk of homelessness, individuals or families fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, victims of human trafficking, individuals or households at risk of housing instability or requiring services to prevent homelessness, and veterans or families with a veteran. All qualifying populations must be considered to comply with HOME-ARP requirements. In addition to development, and to further increase housing options, Salt Lake City will fund rental assistance under Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) in the amount of$1,501,608.00. TBRA can be used to fund payments to cover insufficient amounts that the qualifying household cannot pay for housing and housing related costs, such as rental assistance, security deposits, and utilities deposits for qualifying populations. 26 This funding can be used with one or multiple subrecipient nonprofits in the community. Many organizations are already providing these resources but are reaching capacity and the need is much higher than the availability. This would allow for nonprofits to divert other funding resources to hire or retain staff that are assisting Salt Lake City residents, who meet the definition of a qualifying population, while also providing needed rental assistance. Salt Lake City will serve qualifying populations by prioritizing development of affordable housing and TBRA over the other eligible activities based on the community assessment, local legislative priority, and other known resources available within the community. Describe how the characteristics of the shelter and housing inventory, service delivery system, and the needs identified in the gap analysis provided a rationale for the plan to fund eligible activities: According to the data gathered and the survey respondents there is a high need in additional affordable housing. There seems to be a gap of 8,935 rental units for individuals and families making at or below 50% AMI. That gap continues to grow in the current economy of increased inflation and increased rental rates that wages are not able to keep up with. Currently Salt Lake City has two of the five homeless resource centers in its incorporated boundary and one domestic violence shelter. To promote housing first and take the survey into consideration, creating deeply affordable housing would address both the housing inventory gap and the current amount of people utilizing the homeless resource centers. The nonprofits that provide rental assistance resources to the qualifying populations state that their staffing capacity is low, due to recruitment challenges and low retention. Funding TBRA would allow for nonprofits to divert other funding resources received to hire or retain staff that are assisting Salt Lake City residents, who meet the definition of a qualifying population, while also providing needed rental assistance. HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals Estimate the number of affordable rental housing units for qualifying populations that the PJ will produce or support with its HOME ARP allocation: If Salt Lake City provides $1,501,608.00 in funding for affordable housing developments, it would assist with one to two development projects depending on the need and size of the project. HUD waived the maximum per-unit subsidy for HOME-ARP development dollars. It would be anticipated that a project will be mixed with fair market, high affordability, and low affordability units to sustain the project for at least 15 years. This mix can also include units of varying size, from studio to four bedrooms to accommodate individuals and families. According to the HUD Housing Production Goal Calculation spreadsheet, Salt Lake City estimates producing or supporting 4-8 units for HOME-ARP qualifying populations. Salt Lake City estimates spending between $200,000 and $400,000 of HOME-APR dollars on each deeply affordable HOME unit. That number is based on a recent deeply affordable project as well as accounting for the increasing material and labor costs in the construction market. 27 Describe the specific affordable rental housing production goal that the PJ hopes to achieve and describe how the production goal will address the PJ's priority needs: Affordable rental housing production is part of Salt Lake City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan under the goal of housing. This goal is to expand housing options, specifically affordable housing citywide. The 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan identified 5,075 households assisted over the four-year timeframe,which is 1,268 annually (Consolidated Plan SP-45, 2020-2021 Action Plan AP-20). The number identified includes annual CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funding for projects like rehabilitation, development, home ownership, and rental assistance. Since this funding would be including development and TBRA it can support the goal of assisting 1,268 household. Based on the 2020-2021 CAPER, it is likely that HOME-ARP will assist in 11 of the rental housing production goal for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. 28 Preferences A preference provides a priority for the selection of applicants who fall into a specific QP or category (e.g., elderly or persons with disabilities) within a QP (i.e., subpopulation) to receive assistance. A preference permits an eligible applicant that qualifies for a PJ-adopted preference to be selected for HOME ARP assistance before another eligible applicant that does not qualify fora preference. A method of prioritization is the process by which a PJ determines how two or more eligible applicants qualifying for the same or different preferences are selected for HOME- ARP assistance. For example, in a project with a preference for chronically homeless, all eligible QP applicants are selected in chronological order for a HOME ARP rental project except that eligible QP applicants that qualms for the preference of chronically homeless are selected for occupancy based on length of time they have been homeless before eligible QP applicants who do not qualify for the preference of chronically homeless. Please note that HUD has also described a method of prioritization in other HUD guidance. Section I.C.4 of Notice CPD-17-01 describes Prioritization in CoC CE as follows: "Prioritization. In the context of the coordinated entry process, HUD uses the term "Prioritization" to refer to the coordinated entry-specific process by which all persons in need of assistance who use coordinated entry are ranked in order of priority. The coordinated entry prioritization policies are established by the CoC with input from all community stakeholders and must ensure that ESG projects are able to serve clients in accordance with written standards that are established under 24 CFR 576.400(e). In addition, the coordinated entry process must, to the maximum extent feasible, ensure that people with more severe service needs and levels of vulnerability are prioritized for housing and homeless assistance before those with less severe service needs and lower levels of vulnerability. Regardless of how prioritization decisions are implemented, the prioritization process must follow the requirements in Section II.B.3. and Section I.D. of this Notice. " If a PJ is using a CE that has a method of prioritization described in CPD-17-01, then a PJ has preferences and a method ofprioritizing those preferences. These must be described in the HOME-ARP allocation plan in order to comply with the requirements of Section IV.C.2 (page 10) of the HOME ARP Notice. In accordance with Section V.C.4 of the Notice (page 15), the HOME ARP allocation plan must identify whether the PJ intends to give a preference to one or more qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project. • Preferences cannot violate any applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). • The PJ must comply with all applicable nondiscrimination and equal opportunity laws and requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a) and any other applicable fair housing and 29 civil rights laws and requirements when establishing preferences or methods of prioritization. While PJs are not required to describe specific projects in its HOME-ARP allocation plan to which the preferences will apply, the PJ must describe the planned use of any preferences in its HOME-ARP allocation plan. This requirement also applies if the PJ intends to commit HOME- ARP funds to projects that will utilize preferences or limitations to comply with restrictive eligibility requirements of another project funding source. If a PJfails to describe preferences or limitations in its plan, it cannot commit HOME ARP funds to a project that will implement a preference or limitation until the PJ amends its HOME ARP allocation plan. For HOME ARP rental housing projects, Section VLB.20.a.iii of the HOME ARP Notice (page 36) states that owners may only limit eligibility or give a preference to a particular qualifying population or segment of the qualifying population if the limitation or preference is described in the PJ's HOME ARP allocation plan. Adding a preference or limitation not previously described in the plan requires a substantial amendment and a public comment period in accordance with Section V.C.6 of the Notice (page 16). Identify whether the PJ intends to give preference to one or more qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project: The survey respondents have clearly stated that more deeply affordable housing is needed in Salt Lake City for families and individuals experiencing homelessness. Homeless individuals and families defined in the HOME-ARP Notice, according to ESG and CoC. It is proposed that deeply affordable housing being created would prioritize families and individuals experiencing homelessness. TBRA would not have a prioritization based on qualifying populations and can be open to any agencies that provide an eligible service to any qualifying population. If a preference was identified, explain how the use of a preference or method of prioritization will address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or subpopulation of qualifying population, consistent with the PJ's needs assessment and gap analysis: According to the housing inventory numbers previously shown there is a gap in deeply affordable units, for individuals and families making less than 30%AMI. There are currently 4,745 units available to Salt Lake City residents at or under 30%AMI with 6,555 households in Salt Lake City falling under the 30%AMI threshold. That leaves a gap of 1,810 units needed for the current residents. That does not consider the increase in population that Utah and Salt Lake City will likely see over the next five years. Creating deeply affordable housing units and prioritizing families and individuals currently experiencing homelessness will address the gap in housing since most individuals and families experiencing homelessness fall under 30%AMI and are currently priced out of the rising rental market. 30 Referral Methods PJs are not required to describe referral methods in the plan. However, if a PJ intends to use a coordinated entry (CE)process for referrals to a HOME-ARP project or activity, the PJ must ensure compliance with Section IV.C2 of the Notice (page]0). A PJ may use only the CE for direct referrals to HOME ARP projects and activities (as opposed to CE and other referral agencies or a waitlist) if the CE expands to accept all HOME-ARP qualifying populations and implements the preferences and prioritization established by the PJ in its HOME-ARP allocation plan. A direct referral is where the CE provides the eligible applicant directly to the PJ, subrecipient, or owner to receive HOME ARP TBRA, supportive services, admittance to a HOME-ARP rental unit, or occupancy of a NCS unit. In comparison, an indirect referral is where a CE(or other referral source) refers an eligible applicant for placement to a projector activity waitlist. Eligible applicants are then selected for a HOME- ARP project or activity from the waitlist. The PJ must require a project or activity to use CE along with other referral methods (as provided in Section IV.C2.ii) or to use only aproject/activity waiting list (as provided in Section IV C.2.iii) if L the CE does not have a sufficient number of qualifying individuals and families to refer to the PJfor the project or activity; 2. the CE does not include all HOME-ARP qualifying populations; or, 3. the CE fails to provide access and implement uniform referral processes in situations where a project's geographic area(s) is broader than the geographic area(s) covered by the CE If a PJ uses a CE that prioritizes one or more qualifying populations or segments of qualifying populations (e.g.,prioritizing assistance or units for chronically homeless individuals first, then prioritizing homeless youth second,followed by any other individuals qualifying as homeless, etc.) then this constitutes the use of preferences and a method of prioritization. To implement a CE with these preferences and priorities, the PJ must include the preferences and method of prioritization that the CE will use in the preferences section of their HOME-ARP allocation plan. Use of a CE with embedded preferences or methods of prioritization that are not contained in the PJ's HOME-ARP allocation does not comply with Section IV.C2 of the Notice (pagel0). Identify the referral methods that the PJ intends to use for its HOME ARP projects and activities. PJ's may use multiple referral methods in its HOME ARP program. (Optional): Local subrecipients will be required to operate HOME-ARP funded programs with no exclusions in the following way. All TBRA activities will be utilized on a first come, first eligible basis. The Development projects must be required to use a first come, first served basis,unless the family or individual is currently experiencing homelessness. That family or individual currently experiencing homelessness can be prioritized for the HOME units in the project being created. All subrecipients and projects will be required to have a waitlist for the HOME-ARP program. Based on the qualifying population, required documentation will be needed to support the qualifying status. Documentation may include but is not limited to; Utah Homeless Management Information System(UHMIS), Paystubs/Tax Returns, Case Manager Verification, State Assistance Verification (SNAP, TANF, Unemployment), VA Verification. 31 If the PJ intends to use the coordinated entry (CE)process established by the CoC, describe whether all qualifying populations eligible for a project or activity will be included in the CE process, or the method by which all qualifying populations eligible for the project or activity will be covered. (Optional): Salt Lake City does not intend to use the coordinated entry process established by the CoC since it does not serve all the qualifying populations listed in the HOME-ARP Notice CPD-21-10. If the PJ intends to use the CE process established by the CoC, describe the method of prioritization to be used by the CE. (Optional): Not Applicable If the PJ intends to use both a CE process established by the CoC and another referral method for a project or activity, describe any method ofprioritization between the two referral methods, if any. (Optional): Not Applicable Limitations in a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project Limiting eligibility for a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project is only permitted under certain circumstances. • PJs must follow all applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). This includes, but is not limited to, the Fair Housing Act, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, section 504 of Rehabilitation Act, HUD's Equal Access Rule, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, as applicable. • A PJ may not exclude otherwise eligible qualifying populations from its overall HOME- ARP program. • Within the qualifying populations,participation in a project or activity may be limited to persons with a specific disability only, if necessary, to provide effective housing, aid, benefit, or services that would be as effective as those provided to others in accordance with 24 CFR 8.4(b)(I)(iv). A PJmust describe why such a limitation for a project or activity is necessary in its HOME-ARP allocation plan (based on the needs and gap identified by the PJ in its plan) to meet some greater need and to provide a specific benefit that cannot be provided through the provision of a preference. • For HOME-ARP rental housing, section VLB.20.a.iii of the Notice (page 36) states that owners may only limit eligibility to a particular qualifying population or segment of the qualifying population if the limitation is described in the PJs HOME-ARP allocation plan. • PJs may limit admission to HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS to households who need the specialized supportive services that are provided in such housing or NCS. However, no otherwise eligible individuals with disabilities or families including an individual with a disability who may benefit from the services provided may be excluded on the grounds that they do not have a particular disability. 32 Describe whether the PJ intends to limit eligibility for a HOME ARP rental housing or NCS project to a particular qualifying population or specific subpopulation of a qualifying population identified in section IV.A of the Notice: Salt Lake City does not intend to limit eligibility for HOME-ARP rental housing. If a PJ intends to implement a limitation, explain why the use of a limitation is necessary to address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or subpopulation of qualifying population, consistent with the PJ's needs assessment and gap analysis: Not Applicable If a limitation was identified, describe how the PJ will address the unmet needs or gaps in benefits and services of the other qualifying populations that are not included in the limitation through the use of HOME ARP funds (i.e., through another of the PJ's HOME ARP projects or activities): Not Applicable 33 EXHIBIT 2: Summary of Public Comment SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS The first Public Comment Period was a hybrid meeting held May 22,2022,through June 8,2022,with a Public Hearing hosted by Housing Stability on June 1,2022.There were no comments received during the Public Comment period or the Public Hearing.This Public Comment Period was an opportunity for the public to review and give feedback on an initial draft of the HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan. A second Public Comment Period will be held February 7,2023,through March 21,2023,with a second Public Hearing on February 21,2023.After this period,received public comments will be reviewed and included in the final submission to HUD of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and Substantial Amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. All Public Comment Notices are posted in English and Spanish on the State's Public Notice website, printed in a newspaper of general circulation,sent to community partners to post,and provided to the Mayor's Office and the Council Office for dissemination on social media platforms and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. RESOLUTION NO. OF 2023 A resolution adopting an amendment to the One-Year Action Plan for 2021-2022 to include the American Rescue Plan(ARP)Act of 2021 Housing and Urban Development HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding. WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Council approved Resolution No. 14 of 2021, an appropriations resolution adopting the funding for the One-Year Annual Action Plan for 2021- 2022, which includes HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD), and is attached hereto as Exhibit"A"; and WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation(City) is eligible under Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 24, Part 91, et. al., to receive ARP Act 2021 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HOME Investment Partnerships Program(HOME-ARP) funds in the amount of$3,533,195 from HUD for the program year 2021-2022; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the people of Salt Lake City that the City file an application with HUD for said funds in accordance with 24 CFR Part 91; and WHEREAS, in order to receive said funds, the City is required to substantially amend the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan to include a HOME-ARP Allocation Plan; and WHEREAS, the public notices and other pre-submission requirements as set forth in 24 CFR Part 91 have been accomplished by the City, including but not limited to the following: The first public comment period was held on the substantial amendment and draft allocation plan May 22 through June 8, 2022, and an Administration public hearing on June 1, 2022. A second public comment period was held on February 7 through March 21, 2023, and a City Council public hearing on February 21, 2023; and WHEREAS, the City Council does now meet on this day of , 2023 to adopt a"substantial amendment"to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan to include the HOME- ARP Allocation Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: I. That the City hereby adopts and ratifies the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. 2. That the City hereby adopts as a substantial amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan, the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan for HOME-ARP funds, which is attached hereto as Exhibit`B". 3. That the Mayor, as the official representative of Salt Lake City, or her designee, is hereby authorized to submit for the HOME-ARP funds with such additional 1 information and certifications as may be required under 24 CFR Part 91 to HUD. 4. That the Mayor, as the official representative of the City, or her designee, is hereby authorized to sign and execute a grant agreement with HUD (the "HUD Grant Agreement")regarding the HOME-ARP funds, and any and all subsequent agreements between the City and other public entities resulting from and consistent with the HUD Grant Agreement, subject to final approval as to form by the City Attorney. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIR Approved as to form: 7K�jl� Kimberly K. Chytraus Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date: February 9,2023 ATTEST: CITY RECORDER 2 EXHIBIT "A" One-Year Annual Action Plan for 2021-2022 See attached. 3 y' " �': r�d� r• _ q 'I 202M- 2 , UAL ACTION PLAN � ____,.,..,..1;"►fir ISM - / -/��- -� -;�---�•--r- ��" MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 1: &VICE CHAIR,JAMES ROGERS DISTRICT 2: DENNIS FARIS DISTRICT 3: CHRIS WHARTON DISTRICT 4:ANALIA VALDEMOROS DISTRICTS: DARIN MANO DISTRICT 6: DAN DUGAN DISTRICT 7: & CHAIR,AMY FOWLER Prepared by S A L T L A K E C I T Y HOUSING and NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT DIVISION COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS DEPARTMENT SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................4 PR-05 LEAD & RESPONISBLE AGENCIES...............................................................................................14 AP-10 CONSULTATION..............................................................................................................................15 AP-12 PARTICIPATION ..............................................................................................................................26 AP-15 EXPECTED RESOURCES...............................................................................................................29 AP-20 ANNUAL GOAL & STRATEGIES.....................................................................................................35 AP-35 PROJECTS (Summary)....................................................................................................................37 AP-38 PROJECTS (Table) ..........................................................................................................................40 AP-50 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION ..................................................................................................49 AP-55 AFFORDABLE HOUSING................................................................................................................53 AP-60 PUBLIC HOUSING...........................................................................................................................54 AP-65 HOMELESS & OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS ACTIVITIES ..................................................................56 AP-70 HOPWA GOALS...............................................................................................................................61 AP-75 ACTION PLAN BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING.............................................................61 AP-85 OTHER ACTIONS ............................................................................................................................65 AP-90 PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................70 zi SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2021 -2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The Annual Action Plan outlines the activities and funding priorities for the second year of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, covering July 1, 2021 -June 30, 2022. 3 SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.200(b) 1. Introduction Salt Lake Citys 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan is the product of a collaborative, strategic process that spans community partners,service providers, non-profit/for-profit housing developers, housing authorities, internal divisions/departments, and the input of our residents.The Housing and Neighborhood Development(HAND)division of Salt Lake City has worked extensively to identify community development needs and establish goals that align funding streams, community priorities and city initiatives.This plan highlights many of the efforts to maximize and leverage the City's block grant allocations with other resources to build healthy and sustainable communities. The 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan identifies how the City intends to leverage the Community Development Block Grant(CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG), HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS(HOPWA)funding.These four resources will provide for over $5.4 million in support for low-to moderate-income households or areas of the city. As in other cities across the country, Salt Lake City has been grappling with the immediate and long-term impacts of the Coronavirus pandemic on all aspects of life,from education, employment, housing, and basic needs.The Coronavirus pandemic exacerbated existing hardships in Salt Lake City such as growing income inequality, increasing poverty levels, and decreasing affordable housing.This Annual Action Plan works to address concerns within each of these needs and others by continuing to develop and refine new and collaborative strategies.The following highlights a few of the initiatives and efforts that the City is excited about in the coming year: • Salt Lake City underwent a robust community engagement process in the development of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan(Con Plan).These planning efforts provided the City with a clear vision of the needs in the community and a framework for strategic and targeted deployment of funding.The Con Plan will serve as a roadmap as the City implements block grant funding over the next five years.Although the City's Con Plan process concluded just before the Coronavirus pandemic,the needs identified in the Con Plan remain as existing needs in Salt Lake City. Supplemental HUD funding through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Securities(CARES) Act, and the American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA) have and will provide funding to both further advance the goals of the Con Plan and address Coronavirus-related needs in Salt Lake City. 41P �i �c SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Each activity identified in the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan meets one of the five goals as outlined in the Con Plan, summarized below.Additionally,the activities will serve as the catalyst to implement the strategies tied to each of the five goals. o Housing- Provide expanded housing options for all economic and demographic segments of Salt Lake City's population will diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. o Transportation - Promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal transportation options. o Build Community Resiliency- Build resiliency by providing tools to increase economic and/or housing stability. o Homeless Services- Expand access to supportive programs that help ensure that homelessness is rare, brief,and non-recurring. o Behavioral Health - Provide support for low-income and vulnerable populations experiencing behavioral health concerns, such as substance abuse disorders and mental health challenges. • Since taking office in January 2020 Mayor Erin Mendenhall has focused on breaking down equity barriers within Salt Lake City and providing opportunities of upward mobility for residents regardless of race, income, age, or ability. In an effort towards understanding the needs of underrepresented residents,the City's Community and Neighborhoods Department initiated The Future of Housing.A Collective Vision for an Equitable Salt Lake City.This vision encapsulates a recognition of the inequities that are prevalent in Salt Lake City and provides policy recommendations to break down the barriers that divide the City.As a starting point for this vision the City has embarked on a Gentrification Assessment and Displacement Mitigation Study to help identify and address systemic inequalities in housing. • Salt Lake City's response to COVID-19 has been a citywide approach to address the various urgent needs of the community due to the pandemic.Through a COVID-19 declaration of emergency the Mayor directed all City departments to identify resources to support individuals, households, and small businesses most affected by COVID-19. From the beginning of the pandemic, Salt Lake City has coordinated with the State of Utah, Salt Lake County, and our community-based organizations to collectively understand available resources and opportunities to collaborate with 5111 SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN our COVID-19 responses.As the pandemic intensified HAND gathered non-profit service providers, community representatives,and researchers to help understand the City's current and future needs,and to help guide emergency relief funds. In the summer of 2020,the Mayor aligned the City's general fund Funding Our Future housing program applications to target COVID-19 needs, additionally the City Council approved additional emergency general funds towards housing stability rent and mortgage assistance programs. During the pandemic, City staff have also continually promoted through the City's social media and other electronic distribution sources, information related to COVID related assistance and resources,such as the Federal Eviction Moratorium. • The supplemental federal funding that the City received in the form of the CARES Act,greatly assisted new activities to help the City prevent, prepare for, and respond to COVID-19.To utilize the CARES Act CDBG-COVID, ESG-COVID,and HOPWA-COVID funds, Salt Lake City completed a Substantial Amendment on the 2020-2024 Con Plan and conducted an accelerated competitive application process.Awarded activity categories included: Community Stabilization, Public Service Agencies, Housing Stability, Small Business Support, Homeless Prevention,Street Outreach, Rapid Rehousing, and Emergency Shelter.Additionally,the City received Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance Program funds and joined a collaboration with regional funders for a statewide application process to assist renters and prevent duplications of services. In 2021, Salt Lake City will receive funding from the American Rescue Plan Act including HOME funds prioritized for housing and shelter options for homeless individuals, and a second round of Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance. Salt Lake City greatly looks forward to utilizing these relief and assistance funds to further address the City's economic recovery needs. • Salt Lake City has been a constant leader in the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness (Coalition)which is a coordinated coalition of stakeholders working collaboratively to end homelessness in Salt Lake County. In the fall of 2019,the Coalition transitioned to a Homeless Resource Center(HRC) model.The HRC's provide residents housing stability and case management services to assist clients in overcoming barriers to self-sufficiency.The HRC's provide a multitude of services including diversion, housing navigation,job training, employment services, life skills,and connection to community resources.The HRC's will continue to be an important and critical service in our community and will lift our most vulnerable residents out of homelessness. 61P �� �� SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Resembling national trends, Salt Lake City is experiencing an increase in homeless encampments throughout the city,which has been compounded by COVID-19 occupancy limitations at the congregant-setting HRCs.The City has diligently worked with community partners to ensure that safety and basic needs of the campers are met, as well as connecting campers to resources and assistance by implementing Encampment Resource Fairs at the encampment before scheduled clean ups.To help inform the public, and those seeking services, in 2021 the City launched a new online Homeless Service Dashboard to track homeless services and data.This past winter the City also helped with the opening of two winter, non-congregant Emergency Shelters. Recently,the State of Utah reorganized its homeless funding under a new Homeless Services Office directed by a new Homeless Services Coordinator. Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall created a new position in the Mayor's Office, a Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach,to help coordinate homeless services throughout the City and the region,and the Mayor launched a Tiny Home Village campaign to house homeless individuals by the winter of 2021. • Salt Lake City supports the Housing First model,that housing is a right not a privilege.This view shapes housing policy and program implementation. Salt Lake City is working closely with community partners to provide opportunities for permanent supportive housing.This model provides the City's vulnerable residents with critical services to find stability, self-sufficiency,and upward mobility. • Small community businesses serve as the life blood of Salt Lake City.They not only provide opportunities for employment but also build the fabric of diversity within the City. Salt Lake City will continue to support our small, locally owned businesses by providing economic development loan funding through City resources.The COVID-19 crisis has impacted small, local businesses at a devastating level.The City is committed to ensuring that small, local businesses can open safely, and recover from this economic crisis. While this is just a sampling of many of the exciting efforts the City is undertaking to address the needs in our community, it is fair to say that while federal funding plays an important role in our ability to leverage and maximize long-term impact, it is-and will continue to be a struggle as funding continues to be constantly challenged.As a city we look to other communities'best practices and innovative approaches to find the most effective methods of deploying these limited resources. 71P SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN In an effort to engage and leverage best practices across the nation, HAND participates in training opportunities, attends in-person or remote national conferences, contributes to regional planning conversations, and looks for opportunities to advocate not only for affordable housing, but also for addressing the gaps of funding or services that exist in our community. 2.Summarize the Goals and Strategies identified in the Plan This Year-2 Annual Action Plan establishes and addressed several goals and strategies as outlined in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan.These goals are briefly outlined below. Greater detail is provided in section AP-20. 1) Housing: Provide expanded housing options for all economic and demographic segments of Salt Lake City's population while diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. Strategies: • Support housing programs that address the needs of aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods • Expand housing support for aging residents that ensure access to continued stable housing • Support affordable housing development that increases the number and types of units available for income eligible residents • Support programs that provide access to home ownership via down payment assistance, and/or housing subsidy,and/or financing • Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and end homelessness • Support programs that provide connection to permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs. Support may include, but is not limited to supporting obtaining housing via deposit and rent assistance and barrier elimination to the extent allowable to regulation • Provide housing and essential services for persons with HIV/AIDS 2) Transportation: Promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal transportation options. Strategies: • Improve bus stop amenities as a way to encourage the accessibility of public transit and enhance the experience of public transit in target areas • Support access to transportation prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations • Expand and support the installation of bike racks, stations,and amenities as a way to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation in target areas 8 1 P a g e SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 3) Build Community Resiliency: Build resiliency by providing tools to increase economic and/or housing stability. Strategies: • Provide job training/vocational training programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations including, but not limited to; chronically homeless;those exiting treatment centers/programs and/or institutions; and persons with disabilities • Economic Development efforts via supporting the improvement and visibility of small businesses through fagade improvement programs • Provide economic development support for microenterprise businesses • Direct financial assistance to for-profit businesses • Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement, social development,and change the cycle of poverty • Promote digital inclusion through access to digital communication technologies and the internet • Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable populations 4) Homeless Services: Expand access to supportive programs that help ensure that homelessness is rare, brief, and non-recurring. Strategies: • Expand support for medical and dental care options for those experiencing homelessness • Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow operations • Provide support for programs providing outreach services to address the needs of those living an unsheltered life • Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services 5) Behavioral Health: Provide support for low-income and vulnerable populations experiencing behavioral health concerns such as substance abuse disorders and mental health challenges. Strategies: • Expand treatment options, counseling support, and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis 6) Administration To support the administration, coordination,and management of Salt Lake City's CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA programs. Salt Lake City's strategy for most effectively utilizing HUD funding is heavily influenced by the City's housing market study,the City's Five Year Housing Plan,the annual Utah Comprehensive Report on 9 1 P a g e SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Homelessness,and the adopted Salt Lake City Master Plans that highlight strategic neighborhood investment opportunities. 3. Evaluation of past performance Salt Lake City deliberately monitors the process of advancing the strategic goals outlined in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan.This plan, like the previous Consolidated Plan was developed with input from many stakeholders,and it is our responsibility to report back to the U.S. Department of Housing& Urban Development(HUD),the residents,the community,and decision makers,the impact of these funds.As we near completion of the 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan, here is an evaluation of progress during that time. In preparation for development of the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan, Salt Lake City's Housing and Neighborhood Development(HAND)division reviewed Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports(CAPERS)submitted to HUD under the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan,as well as point-in-time data for the 2020-2021 CAPER,to be submitted to HUD after July 1, 2021.The CAPERs provide an evaluation of past performance and accomplishments in relation to established goals and priorities.The City's previous Action Plans and CAPERS can be viewed at www.hudexchange.info/programs/consolidated-plan/con- plans-caps-capers/. During the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan, and to-date for the 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan,the City has been able to meet the majority of established goals and priorities. In addition,the City was able to comply with statutes and regulations set by HUD. SALT LAKE CITY's FY2020-2021 ACCOMLISHMENTS Goal Description Estimated* Projected** 1 Housing- Expand Housing Options 633 1,033 2 Transportation- Improve Access to Transportation 271 137 3 Community Resiliency-Increase Economic and/or Housing Stability 113 107 4 Homeless Services 630 8,212 5 Behavioral Health 299 877 101Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN *Estimated-An estimation of future accomplishments based on award amounts and historical accomplishment data. **Projected-Presumed final accomplishment based on current trends and point-in-time data. All the goals surrounding homeownership continued to be a struggle as the City experiences a sustained, rapid increase in housing prices and land values.These housing market conditions created challenges on two fronts, 1)finding eligible households who can afford housing units long-term, and 2)finding units available to purchase to utilize for affordable housing. Often, single-family homes are on the market mere moments before very competitive offers come in. Unfortunately, municipalities are not set up to quickly react as housing becomes available.This often means that the City ends up paying more for a unit that requires rehabilitation to bring it up to city code.These increased costs must be carefully weighed as housing can easily out-price available federal subsidies and regulatory limitations. In 2016,the City launched a new economic development program to address the fa4ades of businesses within a geographic target area of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan.The reception of the program and impact has been overwhelmingly positive, even though our initial projections proved to be optimistic for a new program. Over the past several years,the City has taken a different approach to homeless services.This includes making a commitment of over$2 million from general fund sources.As homelessness continues to be an issue that needs to be addressed, the City took the approach of shifting many of the service providers from this competitive annual process to the general fund. Additionally, Salt Lake City has further invested general fund dollars into homeless services and housing stabilization through the Funding Our Future sales tax increase initiative.This shift allowed the City to invest significantly more funding, provide local direction, closely monitor performance measurements, and provide flexibility that makes sense for the local challenges we face. It is important to reiterate that the City continues to be committed to providing and expanding services for the homeless population.This also means that federal resources are being diverted to address other Consolidated Plan goals,while the City is taking the opportunity to leverage local resources. However, providing public services to our community fell short in previous years. Over the past few years, the City modified its strategy for spending in this category, providing more services to a smaller group of people that are in greatest need. While this was a successful strategy, ensuring the most vulnerable were served, COVID has created a substantial increase in the number of residents served under public services 111Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN over the past year. This trend is likely to continue in the coming year,as we move into the recovery phase of the pandemic. Salt Lake City will soon be receiving final reports regarding program year 2020-2021 funding.This data will inform future decisions about funding allocations.This data will also be fully reflected in the upcoming Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation and Report(CAPER). 4.Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process Citizen participation is an integral part of the Consolidated Plan &Annual Action Plan planning process,as it ensures goals and priorities are defined in the context of the community needs and preferences. In addition,the citizen participation process provides a format to educate the community about the City's federal grant programs.To this end, Salt Lake City solicited involvement from a diverse group of stakeholders and community members during the development of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan.A comprehensive public engagement process included a citywide survey(including 2,000+ respondents), public hearings, public meetings, one-on-one meetings,stakeholder committee meetings,task force meetings, Salt Lake City internal technical committee meetings, and a public comment period. In total, over 4,000 residents participated in providing input into the Consolidated Plan.The City received input and buy-in from residents, homeless service providers, low-income service providers,anti-poverty advocates, healthcare providers, housing advocates, housing developers, housing authorities, community development organizations, educational institutions,transit authority planners, City divisions and departments,among others. For this 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan,the City conducted a Community Engagement Survey to collect public input on their top priorities of the goals identified in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. Due to COVID-19 precautions, City Staff worked with a range of community partners to collect mostly electronic responses and targeted safe, in-person responses from vulnerable populations.A total of 879 responses were collected. For more information on the citizen participation efforts, refer to the AP-10 Consultation section. The City held public hearings at different points in the Annual Action Plan process.The General Needs Hearing is an event open to the public to comment on community needs. HAND accepts all comments and looks to understand how federal funding can address these concerns. The concerns that are not within the prevue of the federal funding is passed along to the appropriate City Department.The City 121Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Council Public Hearing is an opportunity for the public and non-profit partners to comment on how federal funding may impact their neighborhoods or the services being provided. More detail about these events are available in the AP-12 Participation section. 5.Summary of public comments A summary of the public comments for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan can be found in the appendix of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan.All comments received for the Consolidated Plan were considered while creating this 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. On November 5, 2020, HAND staff and members of the Community Development and Capital Improvement Program resident advisory board conducted a virtual General Needs Hearing to hear from residents.Although this hearing was publicly noticed, no residents attended. On April 6, 2021, a virtual City Council Public Hearing was held. In general,the comments were very positive and related to the support of specific agencies.While most comments advocated for a specific organization, many comments cited current demand and proven service models to assist low- income and vulnerable populations.Topics included: homelessness, housing, supportive services, domestic violence, and behavioral health services.Additional public comments addressed the need for more federal or City funding to fully fund the applicant's requests and to fund applicants not recommended for funding.These comments have been taken into consideration for the draft of the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan.A draft of the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan was publicly noticed and made available on HAND's website for comments April 29,2021 through May 13,2021. No comments were received on the draft Plan.A second draft of the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan was publicly noticed and made available on HAND's website for comments May 28,2021 through June 3, 2021. No comments were received on the second draft Plan. 131Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN PR-05 LEAD & RESPONISBLE AGENCIES 91.200(b) 1.Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan Describe the agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. Agency Role Name Department/Agency CDBG Administrator SALT LAKE CITY Housing and Neighborhood Development Division HOPWA Administrator SALT LAKE CITY Housing and Neighborhood Development Division HOME Administrator SALT LAKE CITY Housing and Neighborhood Development Division ESG Administrator SALT LAKE CITY Housing and Neighborhood Development Division Narrative(optional) Salt Lake City was the sole agency responsible for developing the Consolidated Plan and is solely responsible for the subsequent Annual Action Plans. Salt Lake City administers each of the HUD grant programs and the funding sources. Annual Action Plan Public Contact Information • Lani Eggertsen-Goff, Director of Housing and Neighborhood Development, Lani.Eggertsen- Goff@slcgov.com or 801-535-6240. • Jennifer Schumann, Deputy Director, Iennifer.Schumann@slcgov.com or 801-535-7276. • Tony Milner, Policy& Program Manager,Tony.MiIner@slcgov.com or 801-535-6168. • Heather Royall, Community Development Grant Supervisor, Heather.RoyaII@slcgov.com or 385- 977-0935. Salt Lake City Housing and Neighborhood Development 451 South State Street, Room 445 P.O. Box 145488 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5488 141Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-10 CONSULTATION 91.100, 91.200(b),91.215(I) Introduction The City engaged in an in-depth and collaborative effort to consult with City departments, representatives of low- income neighborhoods, non-profit and for-profit housing developers, service providers, social service agencies, homeless shelter and service providers,supportive housing and service providers, community stakeholders, community partners, and beneficiaries of entitlement programs to inform and develop the priorities and strategies contained within the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. Salt Lake City continues to engage these critical partners regularly as we look to maximize our potential impact on an annual basis. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(1)) Salt Lake City is in regular communication with our regional funding partners Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County Continuum of Care, and the State of Utah to coordinate about available funding,and gaps in funding and/or services. During the State of Utah 2021 Legislative Session, HAND and other City key staff worked closely with regional planning groups, such as the Utah League of Cities and Towns,Wasatch Front Regional Council, Utah Housing Coalition, and the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness, as well as local service providers who provide services to individuals experiencing homelessness and/or behavioral health. New legislation and funding in 2021 included: $50 million in new State funding for homeless service and affordable housing projects,the creation of a new State Homeless Services Office and a new Homeless Services Coordinator for the State, rental expenses disclosure requirements, a transit reinvestment zone,and lead exposure education. The City is also a key participant in Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness and Salt Lake County Continuum of Care.The Coalition help coordinate the Homeless Resource Centers, homeless supportive services, and affordable housing for homeless individuals in Salt Lake County with the goal of making homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring. HAND staff participate with the Coalition's Steering Committee,and Housing Inventory,Winter Overflow Shelter,and Vaccine Coordination sub-committees. HAND staff also participate with the Utah Homeless Management Information Services(HMIS)Steering Committee,and the HOPWA Steering Committee. 151Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons(particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children,veterans, and unaccompanied youth)and persons at risk of homelessness Salt Lake City representatives actively participated in the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness(SLVCEH), the entity responsible for oversight of the Continuum of Care(CoC). SLVCEH's primary goal is to end homelessness in Salt Lake Valley through a system-wide commitment of resources, services, data collection, analysis, and coordination among all stakeholders.The Coalition gathers community consensus to create and fulfill established outcomes. Using these goals, the Coalition partners with key stakeholders to fill the needs of the Salt Lake County Valley community. City representatives serve on the SLVCEH Steering Committee and sub-committees, and actively participated in meetings and efforts. Salt Lake City representatives participate in the local Continuum of Care's(CoQ executive board and its prioritization committee specifically, so the Continuum of Care's priorities are considered during Emergency Solutions Grant allocations.Also,the three local Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG)funders meet regularly to coordinate ESG and CoC activities to make sure service are not being over or under funded and services being funded meet the community's needs and goals. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the operation and administration of HMIS Allocate ESG Funds Salt Lake City representatives participate in the local Continuum of Care's executive board and its prioritization committee specifically, so the Continuum of Care's priorities are considered during Emergency Solutions Grant allocations.Also,the three local ESG funders meet regularly to coordinate ESG and CoC activities to make sure service are not being over or under funded and services being funded meet the community's needs and goals. Develop Performance Standards and Evaluate Outcomes The Salt Lake Continuum of Care and the three ESG funders share common measures to evaluate service providers. The three entities also share monitoring results of subrecipients. Develop Funding, Policies and Procedures for the Administration of HMIS 161Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The Salt Lake Continuum of Care contracts with the State of Utah to administer the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS).All service agencies in the state are under a uniform data standard for HUD reporting and local ESG funders.All ESG funded organizations participate in HMIS. For the City's 2020 Community Engagement Survey, HAND staff worked closely with a diverse range of community councils, non-profit service providers and community partners to help distribute and collect survey responses.The survey was available in English and Spanish, both online and a paper version,and targeted engagement included: low-income populations, racial and ethnic minority populations, minority Chambers of Commerce,Spanish speaking communities, CDBG West Side Target Area communities (refer to the AP-50 Geographical Distribution section), vulnerable populations, and individuals experiencing homelessness. Over 100 community partners were engaged. Listed in the table below is a sample of the community partners. TABLE:CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PARTICIPANTS ENGAGEMENT COMMUNITY PARTNERS Agency/Group/Organization Refugee and Immigration Center-Asian Association of Utah Agency/Group/Organization Type Services- Refugees What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 2 Agency/Group/Organization ASSIST Agency/Group/Organization Type Services- Persons with Disabilities, Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment, Non-Homeless Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 3 Agency/Group/Organization Columbus Community Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services- Employment, Persons with Disabilities 171Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan,including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Comunidades Unidas Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Latinx Health,Community Engagement What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan,including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Community Development Corporation, Utah Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan,including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Community Health Center of Utah Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan,including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Disability Law Center 181Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Law, Persons with Disabilities What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan,including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Donated Dental Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs- Families with Children, Non-Homeless ■consultation? Special Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization First Step House Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Housing,Persons with Disabilities, Homeless, Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment, Homeless Needs-Chronically consultation? Homeless, Homeless Needs-Veterans, Homeless Strategy, Non-Homeless Special Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan,including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Habitat for Humanity Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of 191Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Salt Lake County Housing Authority DBA Housing Connect Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Housing,Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment, Homeless Strategy consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan,including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Maliheh Free Clinic Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Health,Refugees What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan,including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization NeighborWorks Salt Lake Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan,including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Salt Lake City Housing Authority Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Housing, Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment, Homeless Strategy consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the 201Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN outcomes of the consultation or areas for closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City improved coordination? was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan,including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Salt Lake County Aging and Adult Services Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Seniors,Aging Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan,including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Shelter the Homeless Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment, Homeless Strategy, Homeless consultation? Needs-Chronically Homeless How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization South Valley Services Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Domestic Violence What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs Wconsultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan,including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Agency/Group/Organization Utah Community Action Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Housing,Food Bank, Early Education What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment, Homeless Strategy,Anti-Poverty consultation? Strategy 211Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 19 Agency/Group/Organization Volunteers of America-Utah Agency/Group/Organization Type Services- Housing, Persons with Disabilities, Homeless, Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment, Homeless Needs-Chronically consultation? Homeless, Homeless Needs-Families with Children, Homeless Needs-Veterans, Homeless Needs- Unaccompanied Youth, Homeless Strategy,Anti-Poverty Strategy How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. 20 Agency/Group/Organization Young Women's Christian Association Agency/Group/Organization Type Services- Housing, Children,Victims of Domestic Violence, Homeless,Victims What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs- Families with Children, Homeless Strategy, consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization Public Service Organization that assisted in identifying service consulted and what are the anticipated gaps within the community.The collaborative effort allowed outcomes of the consultation or areas for for discussion and feedback from the agencies that are the improved coordination? closest to those we are assisting. From these efforts,the City was able to determine the overarching priorities and goals of the Plan, including specific public service focus areas where funding will be targeted and leveraged community wide. Salt Lake City continues to monitor broadband needs and barriers for low-to moderate-income households. In the City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, section MA-60: Broadband Needs of Housing Occupied by Low-and Moderate-Income Households, Salt Lake City identified underserved communities and those without access to the internet.The accessibility, speed and affordability of devices and connections that facilitate internet broadband are crucial factors for low-income households in relation to remote work and schooling, access to health providers,and applications for benefits and resources. In Salt Lake City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan goal of Build Community Resiliency, Salt Lake City included the strategy of promoting digital inclusion through access to digital communication technologies and the internet. 221Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN As our community faces challenges that hinder economic mobility, education,access to technology and increase food insecurity. Service providers, industry experts, data analysis, community members,and elected officials all agree that providing support for these efforts will enhance community resiliency as we look to improve access to critical services and rebuild from national,state or local emergencies. In Salt Lake City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, resiliency was identified in the Build Community Resiliency goal, to expand opportunities for individuals and households living in poverty or in the cycle of intergenerational poverty. Strategies around this goal include services to expand accessibility to employment opportunities, improve and enhance small businesses, promote access to early childhood education, expand the availability of digital technologies,and reduce food insecurities. Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting: All agency types were invited to participate in the Annual Action Plan process. Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan TABLE:PLAN CONSULTATION COMMUNITY PLAN CONSULTATIONS Name of Plan 10-Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness Lead Organization State of Utah How do the goals of Created in 2004, updated in 2013,this plan highlights initiatives centered on using your Strategic Plan the Housing First Model to end chronic homelessness.This plan places minimal overlap with the goals restriction on persons to place them into safe housing. Housing goals include of each plan? promoting the construction of safe,decent,and affordable homes for all income levels and to put specific emphasis on housing homeless persons. 2 Name of Plan Annual Point-in-Time Count Lead Organization State of Utah How do the goals of This plan highlights an initiative to find homeless persons living on the streets and your Strategic Plan gather information in order to connect them with available services. By doing so, overlap with the goals this will help policymakers and program administrators set benchmarks to of each plan? measure progress toward the goal of ending homelessness, help plan services and programs to appropriately address local needs, identify strengths and gaps in a community's current homelessness assistance system, inform public opinion, increase public awareness, attract resources,and create the most reliable estimate of people experiencing homelessness throughout Utah. 3 Name of Plan Growing SLC Lead Organization Salt Lake City How do the goals of Policy solutions over the five year period of this plan will focus on: 1)updates to your Strategic Plan zoning code,2)preservation of long-term affordable housing,3)establishment of 231Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN overlap with the goals a significant funding source,4)stabilizing low-income tenants,5)innovation in of each plan? design,6)partnerships and collaboration in housing,and 7)equitability and fair housing. Name of Plan Salt Lake City Master Plans Lead Organization Salt Lake City How do the goals of Salt Lake City's master plans provide vision and goals for future development in your Strategic Plan the City.The plans guide the development and use of land, as well as provide overlap with the goals recommendations for particular places within the City. HAND utilized the City's of each plan? master plans to align policies,goals,and priorities. Name of Plan Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness Lead Organization Salt Lake County How do the goals of This plan emphasizes the promotion of a community-wide commitment to the your Strategic Plan goal of ending homelessness, provide funding for efforts to quickly re-house overlap with the goals individuals and families who are homeless,which minimizes the trauma and of each plan? dislocation caused by homelessness, promote access to and effective use of mainstream programs,optimize self-sufficiency among individuals and families experiencing homelessness Name of Plan State of Utah Strategic Plan on Homelessness Lead Organization State of Utah How do the goals of The strategic plan establishes statewide goals and benchmarks on which to your Strategic Plan measure progress toward these goals.The plan recognizes that every community overlap with the goals in Utah is different in their challenges, resources available,and needs of those of each plan? who experience homelessness. Name of Plan Strategic Economic Development Plan Lead Organization Salt Lake City Economic Development How do the goals of The Strategic Plan establishes an assessment of existing economic conditions of your Strategic Plan Salt Lake City through analysis of quantitative and qualitative data.This overlap with the goals information guided a strategic framework that builds on existing strengths and of each plan? seeks to overcome identified challenges to ensure the City's fiscal health,enhance its business climate,and promote economic growth. Name of Plan Housing Gap Coalition Report Lead Organization Salt Lake Chamber How do the goals of Initiative that seeks to safeguard Utah's economic prosperity by ensuring home your Strategic Plan ownership is attainable and housing affordability is a priority, protecting Utahns overlap with the goals quality of life and expanding opportunities for all. of each plan? Name of Plan Housing Affordability Crisis Lead Organization Kern C.Gardner Policy Institute How do the goals of Policy brief regarding the current and projected state of rising housing prices in your Strategic Plan Utah and recommendations regarding what to do about it. 241Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN overlap with the goals of each plan? 2511' SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-12 PARTICIPATION 91.105,91.200(c) 1.Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting The City seeks to develop and enhance livable, healthy,and sustainable neighborhoods through robust planning and actions that reflect the needs and values of the local community.The City has stayed true to its values of inclusiveness and innovation by embracing opportunities to provide equitable services, offer funding,and create housing opportunities that improve lives for individuals and families in underserved and under-resourced communities. The City recognizes that citizen participation is critical for the development of a Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans that reflects the needs of affected persons and residents. In accordance with 24 CFR 91.105,the City solicited robust citizen participation. For the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, between May 2019 and May 2020, over 4,000 residents, stakeholders,agency partners, and City officials participated through proactive, community-based outreach,facilitated stakeholder engagement, and online surveys.The City involved affected persons and residents through stakeholder consultation, a community survey, community events, public meetings, public hearings, public comment periods,and one-on-one consultations.The full details of these efforts can be found in the City's 2020-2024 Consolidated and 2020-2024 Citizen Participation Plan. For the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan, between July 2020 to October 2020, HAND staff conducted a survey to engage members of the public and receive input on how federal funding could be prioritized. In the past HAND staff would attend up to 20 in-person community events and collect an average of 1,200 responses per year. Due to COVID-19 precautions, HAND staff worked with the City's Civic Engagement team and pivoted to an online community engagement survey, reaching out electronically to Salt Lake City's resident, Recognized Community Organizations,and over 100 non-profits and community partners. The survey was offered in English and Spanish.Additionally,to hear from vulnerable populations without access to computers, paper versions of the survey were safely collected at the Homeless Resources Centers,two adult Detox locations, the Homeless Youth Resource Center,the Sorensen Community Center, and two local food banks.A total of 879 responses were received. 261Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The public was asked to give input on their top priorities of the goals identified in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. Priority ranking for each goal of the Consolidate Plan were provided, as follows: Housing- Build new affordable housing and homeownership for low income populations.Transportation - Provide transit passes to low-income populations. Build Community Resiliency- Provide access to affordable and healthy food. Homeless Services- Homeless Resources Centers operations and emergency shelter. Behavioral Health - Resources for individuals with Behvorial health needs.The CD-CIP and HTFAB Boards considered these priorities and how they align with the goals of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan when identifying projects to be recommended for 2021-2022. TABLE:CITIZEN PARTICIPATION OUTREACH SUMMARY CHART Summary of Summary of Summary of Mode of Effort Target of Response/At Comments Comments Outreach Outreach not Accepted tendance Received &Reasons Internet Outreach Survey-Electronic Minorities; 741 Respondents All responses Non-English Respondents ranked were taken Speaking; homeless and into Spanish; affordable consideration Persons with housing as the Annual Disabilities; services as Action Plan Non- their top developed. Targeted/Bro priorities for ad City services. community; Other residents of priorities Public and included Assisted transit passes, Housing affordable and healthy food assistance, and behavioral health resources. In-Person Survey-Paper Individuals 138 paper Respondents All responses Outreach Form Experiencing responses ranked were taken Homelessnes homeless and into s, Individuals affordable consideration Receiving housing as the Annual Detox services as Action Plan Treatment their top developed. priorities for City services. Other priorities included 271Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Summary of Summary of Summary of Mode of Effort Target of Response/At Comments Comments Outreach Outreach not Accepted tendance Received &Reasons transit passes, affordable and healthy food assistance, and behavioral health resources. Public Hearing General Needs Minorities; No members No responses No responses Remote Public Non-English of the public from the from the Hearing Speaking; attended this public were public were Spanish; hearing. provided. provided. (Due to COVID-19 Persons with precautions,this Disabilities; Public Hearing was Non- publicly noticed in Targeted/Bro English and ad Spanish, held community; remotely on residents of WebEx. Options to Public and submit comments Assisted via phone,email, Housing or mail,and ADA accommodations were offered.) Public Hearing Annual Action Plan City 16 members Most All comments Remote Public Councilmemb of the public comments were Hearing* ers,City staff, attended advocated for accepted and Minorities; and/or a specific taken into (Due to COVID-19 Non-English provided organization consideration precautions,this Speaking; comments at Topics as the Annual Public Hearing was Spanish; this hearing. included: Action Plan publicly noticed in Persons with homelessness was English and Disabilities; , housing, developed. Spanish, held Non- supportive remotely on Targeted/Bro services, DV, WebEx. Options to ad and submit comments community; behavioral via phone,email, residents of health or mail,and ADA Public and services. accommodations Assisted Additional were offered.) Housing comments addressed the need for more federal or City funding to 28 Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Summary of Summary of Summary of Mode of Effort Target of Response/At Comments Comments Outreach Outreach not Accepted tendance Received &Reasons fund requests. Public Notice Annual Action Plan Minorities; No members No responses No responses (Draft Version) Non-English of the public from the from the Public Notice Speaking; provided public were public were Spanish; responses. provided. provided. Persons with Disabilities; Non- Targeted/Bro ad community; residents of Public and Assisted Housing AP-15 EXPECTED RESOURCES 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction TABLE: EXPECTED RESOURCES Expected Amount Available-Year 2 Expected Uses of Amount Funding Annual Program Prior Year Total Available- Description Allocation Income Resources Remainder of Con Plan Acquisition Expected ...................................................................... Amount is a Administration rounded ...................................................................... estimation of Economic the funding Development anticipated Homebuyer to be L9 Assistance received, 00 ----------------------------------- $3,570,517 $0 $572,667 $4,091,332 $10,500,000 o Homeowner based on Rehabilitation current ....................................................................... Multifamily Program Rental Year Construction allocation. Multifamily Prior year ..................C......................................... Public resources Improvements are unspent 291Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Expected Amount Available-Year 2 Expected Uses of Amount Funding Annual Program Prior Year Total Available- Description Allocation Income Resources Remainder of Con Plan Public Services funds from previous ....................................... Rental Years. Rehabilitation ....................................................................... New Construction for Ownership ....................................................................... TBRA ....................................................................... Historic Rental Rehabilitation New Construction Acquisition Expected ....................................................................... Amount is a rounded Administration estimation of ....................................................................... Homebuyer the funding Assistance anticipated ....................................................................... Homeowner to be Rehabilitation received, ....................................................................... Multifamily based on Rental current LU Construction Program O Multifamily $974,863 $674,926 $0 $1,649,789 $2,900,000 Year _ .......................................................... Rental.. ..... allocation. Rehabilitation Program ............................................................ Ne. ..w income is Construction typically for Ownership generated ....................................................................... from housing loan TBRA repayments from nonprofit agencies. Administration ....................................................................... Financial Prior year Assistance resources ....................................................................... wOvernight $299 267 $0 $9,450 $308,717 $900,000 are unspent Shelter funds from Rapid Re- previous Housing years. (Rental Assistance) 301Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Expected Amount Available-Year 2 Expected Uses of Amount Funding Annual Program Prior Year Total Available- Description Allocation Income Resources Remainder of Con Plan Rental Assistance Services ....................................................................... Transitional Housing Administration ....................................................................... Permanent Expected Housing in Amount is a Fi ..........acil........................ties..................................... rounded Permanent estimation of Housing the funding Placement anticipated STRMU to be ...................................................................... received, Q Short-Term or based on OTransitional $674,671 $0 $0 $674,671 $2,025,000 current = Housing Program Facilities Year ....................................................................... Supportive allocation. Services Prior year resources are unspent funds from TBRA previous years. Acquisitions ....................................................................... Administration Between The Conversion Housing and Rehab for Development o Transitional Trust Fund D Housing and Funding LL Homebuyer Our Future, D Rehabilitation there is an wUf ....................................................................... T � Housing $2,590,000 $0 $0 $2,590,000 $7,770,000 annual O o Multifamily budget of z Rental New $2.59M.This Construction is expected O ....................................................................... = Multifamily to be an Rental Rehab ongoing New annual Construction allocation. for Ownership 311 P a g e SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Expected Amount Available-Year 2 Expected Uses of Amount Funding Annual Program Prior Year Total Available- Description Allocation Income Resources Remainder of Con Plan Permanent Housing in Facilities ....................................................................... Rapid Re- Housing ......................... Rental Assistance ....................................................................... TBRA ....................................................................... Transitional Housing All CDBG Eligible Activities per Housing Salt Lake City O � Program Rules Housing O --------- ----------------------- $0 $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 $4,500,000 Programs- w z All HOME = Eligible Program p Activities per Income Housing Program Rules 0 z The fund has z a current Q allocation of O J $2M and an z estimated w remaining p $5M. The ED J Economic > Development $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $$5,000,000 program is in o the process U of being 75; revamped, O z so these o numbers w Cf w may change in the future. O Source:Salt Lake City Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources(private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied HUD, like many other federal agencies, encourages the recipients of federal monies to demonstrate that efforts are being made to strategically leverage additional funds to achieve greater results. Matches 321Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN require subrecipients to produce a specific amount of funding that will "match"the amount of program funds available. • HOME Investment Partnership Program -25% Match Requirement Salt Lake City will have no HOME match requirements for 2021-2022. In a US Dept of Housing& Urban Development memo from John Gibbs,Acting Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development(D), dated April 10, 2020, re:Availability of Waivers and Suspensions of the HOME Program Requirements in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic, Salt Lake City intends to continue utilizing the waiver and suspension of HOME match requirements. As per section#4 of the above mentioned memo, Matching Contribution Requirements,given the urgent housing and economic needs created by COVID-19, and substantial financial impact the Participating Jurisdiction(PJ)will face in addressing those needs,wavier of these regulations(24 CFR 92.218 and 92.222(b))will relieve the PJ from the need to identify and provide matching contributions to HOME projects • Emergency Solutions Grant- 100% Match Requirement Salt Lake City will ensure that ESG match requirements are met by utilizing the leveraging capacity of its subgrantees. Funding sources used to meet the ESG match requirements include federal, state and local grants; private contributions; private foundations; United Way; Continuum of Care funding; City General Fund; in-kind match and unrestricted donations. Fund Levera�in� Leverage, in the context of the City's four HUD Programs, means bringing other local, state, and federal financial resources to maximize the reach and impact of the City's HUD Programs. Resources for leverage include the following: • Housing Choice Section 8 Vouchers • Low Income Housing Tax Credits • New Market Tax Credits • RDA Development Funding • Salt Lake City Housing Trust Fund (HTF) • Salt Lake City Economic Development Loan Fund(EDLF) • Salt Lake City General Fund 331Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Olene Walker Housing Loan Fund • Industrial &Commercial Bank Funding • Continuum of Care Funding • Foundations&Other Philanthropic Partners If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan Salt Lake City intends to expand affordable housing and economic development opportunities through the redevelopment of City-owned land,strategic land acquisitions, expansion of the Community Land Trust for affordable housing, parcel assembly, and disposition.The Housing and Neighborhood Development Division will work collaboratively with other City Divisions that oversee or control parcels that are owned by the City to evaluate the appropriateness for affordable housing opportunities. Discussion: Salt Lake City will continue to seek other federal, state and private funds to leverage entitlement grant funding. In addition, the City will support the proposed community development initiatives outlined in this Plan through strategic initiatives, policies, and programs. 341Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-20 ANNUAL GOAL & STRATEGIES TABLE:GOALS,PRIORITY NEEDS AND OUTCOME INDICATORS Star End Geogra Priority Goal Sort Order Goal t Year Category phic Needs Funding Outcome Year Area Addressed Indicator 1 - Housing Expand housing 2021 2022 Affordable Citywid Affordable CDBG $2,087,652 1,149 options Housing e Housing Househol ESG $82,022 ds HOME $1,552,303 assisted HOPWA$604,431 2 - Improve access 2021 2022 Transportati Citywid Transporta CDBG $560,950 271 Transportati to transportation on a tion Househol on ds assisted 3 - Increase 2021 2022 Economic Target Communit CDBG $694,700 551 Community economic and/or Developme Areas/C y Individual Resiliency housing stability nt/Public itywide Resiliency s or Services businesse s assisted 4- Ensure that 2021 2022 Public Citywid Homeless CDBG $250,300 1,862 Homeless homelessness is Services/Ho e Services Persons Services brief, rare, and meless ESG $164,250 assisted non-recurring Services 5 - Support 2021 2022 Public Citywid Behavioral CDBG $48,000 259 Behavioral vulnerable Services/Be e Health Househol Health populations havioral HOPWA$50,000 ds experiencing Health assisted substance abuse and mental health challenges 6- Administration 2021 2022 Administrati Citywid Administra CDBG $703,733 N/A Administrati on e tion on ESG $22,445 HOME $97,486 HOPWA$20,240 351Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Goal Descriptions TABLE GOAL DESCRIPTIONS Goal Name Goal Description 1 Housing To provide expanded housing options for all economic and demographic segments of Salt Lake City s population while diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. • Support housing programs that address the needs of aging housing stock through targeted rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within the neighborhoods • Support affordable housing development that increases the number and types of units available for qualified residents • Support programs that provide access to home ownership • Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and/or end homelessness • Support programs that provide connection to permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs • Provide housing and essential supportive services to persons with H IWAI DS 2 Transportation To promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal transportation options. • Within eligible target areas, improve bus stop amenities to encourage the accessibility of public transit and enhance the experience of public transit • Within eligible target areas,expand and support the installation of bike racks,stations,and amenities to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation • Support access to transportation, prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations 3 Community Resiliency Provide tools to increase economic and/or housing stability • Supportjob training and vocational rehabilitation programs that increase economic mobility • Improve visual and physical appearance of deteriorating commercial buildings-limited to CDBG Target Area • Provide economic development support for microenterprise businesses • Direct financial assistance to for-profit businesses • Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement,social development,and change the cycle of poverty • Promote digital inclusion through access to digital communication technologies and the internet • Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population 4 Homeless Services To expand access to supportive programs that help ensure that homelessness is rare, brief,and non-recurring • Expand support for medical and dental care options for those experiencing homelessness 361Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Goal Name Goal Description • Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency Overflow Operations • Provide support for programs undertaking outreach services to address the needs of those living an unsheltered life • Expand case management support to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services 5 Behavioral Health To provide support for low-income and vulnerable populations experiencing behavioral health concerns such as substance abuse disorders and mental health challenges. • Expand treatment options, counseling support,and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis 6 Administration To support the administration,coordination,and management of Salt Lake City's CDBG, ESG, HOME and HOPWA programs. AP-35 PROJECTS (Summary) 91.200(d) Introduction The goals and strategies outlined in Salt Lake City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan serve as the foundation for program year 2021-2022 projects and activities.The Consolidated Plan encourages building resiliency in low-income areas by investing in economic development, and transportation infrastructure.These two categories of projects/activities will be limited to the West Side CDBG Target Area.The Consolidated Plan also addresses the need to utilize federal funding to further support housing,transportation, building community resiliency, homeless services,and behavioral health.The Consolidated Plan goals will be supported through the following 2021-2022 efforts: This Year-2 Annual Action Plan establishes and addressed several Goals and Strategies as outlined in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. It is recognized that not every strategy will be accessed each year, however, each year there will be projects that move forward each of the goals identified. Housing: Provide expanded housing options for all economic and demographic segments of Salt Lake City's population while diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods. Strategies: • Support housing programs that address the needs of aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods • Expand housing support for aging residents that ensure access to continued stable housing • Support affordable housing development that increases the number and types of units available for income eligible residents 371Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Support programs that provide access to home ownership via down payment assistance,and/or housing subsidy,and/or financing • Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and end homelessness • Support programs that provide connection to permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs. Support may include, but is not limited to supporting obtaining housing via deposit and rent assistance and barrier elimination to the extent allowable to regulation • Provide housing and essential services for persons with HIV/AIDS Transportation: Promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal transportation options. Strategies: • Improve bus stop amenities to encourage the accessibility of public transit and enhance the experience of public transit in target areas • Support access to transportation prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations • Expand and support the installation of bike racks, stations,and amenities to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation in target areas Build Community Resiliency: Build resiliency by providing tools to increase economic and/or housing stability. Strategies: • Provide job training/vocational training programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations including, but not limited to; chronically homeless;those exiting treatment centers/programs and/or institutions; and persons with disabilities • Economic Development efforts via supporting the improvement and visibility of small businesses through fa4ade improvement programs • Provide economic development support for microenterprise businesses • Direct financial assistance to for-profit businesses • Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement,social development,and change the cycle of poverty • Promote digital inclusion through access to digital communication technologies and the internet • Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population Homeless Services: Expand access supportive programs that help ensure that homelessness is rare, brief, and non-recurring. Strategies: • Expand support for medical and dental care options for those experiencing homelessness • Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow operations • Provide support for programs providing outreach services to address the needs of those living an unsheltered life • Expand case management support to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing and supportive services 381Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Behavioral Health: Provide support for low-income and vulnerable populations experiencing behavioral health concerns such as substance abuse disorders and mental health challenges. Strategies: • Expand treatment options, counseling support, and case management for those experiencing behavioral health crisis Administration--To support the administration, coordination,and management of Salt Lake City's CDBG, ESG, HOME,and HOPWA programs. TABLE: PROJECT NAME Project Name 1 CDBG: Public Services: Homeless Service Programs CDBG: Public Services: Build Community Resiliency-job Training&Educational 2 Programs 3 CDBG: Public Services: Behavioral Health 4 1 CDBG: Housing 5 CDBG: Build Community Resiliency-Economic Development 6 CDBG: Public Services:Transportation 7 CDBG:Transportation 8 CDBG:Administration 9 1 ESG21:Salt Lake City 10 HOME:Tenant Based Rental Assistance 11 HOME: Down Payment Assistance 12 HOME:Salt Lake City Home Development Fund 13 HOME:Administration 141 HOPWA21:Salt Lake City 39 Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-38 PROJECTS (Table) TABLE: PROJECT SUMMARY INFORMATION Project Name CDBG Public Services: Homeless Service Programs Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Homeless Services Needs Addressed Homeless: Mitigation, Prevention, Public Services Funding CDBG:$250,300 Funding for eligible actives that support homeless resource centers,emergency shelters and other Description supportive service programs directed to individuals and families experiencing homelessness.Funding allocations are coordinated with local CoC and ESG efforts. Target Date Matrix Code 03T National Objective LMC Estimate the number and type of families 415 homeless individuals including chronically homeless,victims of domestic violence,persons with that will benefit from disabilities and other vulnerable populations are expected to benefit from proposed activities. the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Activities will provide essential day-to-day services for the city's most vulnerable populations.Funding will be targeted,in accordance with meeting a national objective,to support the chronically homeless, homeless families,and victims of domestic violence.Funding is projected to be allocated as follows: The Road Home,Gail Miller Homeless Resource Center,$72,000 Planned Activities Salt Lake Donated Dental Services,Community Dental Project,$44,400 YWCA of Utah,Women in Jeopardy,$33,900 South Valley Services,Domestic Violence Victim Advocate,$100,000 Project Name CDBG Public Services: Build Community Resiliency-Job Training&Educational Programs Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Build Community Resiliency Needs Addressed Build community resiliency Funding CDBG:$194,799 401Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Description Funding for eligible activities that enhance,expand,and improve job training programs to build resiliency and self-sufficiency. Target Date Matrix Code 05H National Objective LMC Estimate the number 546 individuals are expected to benefit from proposed activities.This includes low income residents that and type of families that will benefit from are working with existing job training programs for those that are homeless,exiting homelessness or the proposed activities low-income residents and their children. Location Description Citywide with a focus on assisting residents in racial and ethnic concentrated areas of poverty and local target areas. Activities will provide a cost-effective intervention in increasing self-sufficiency for households for those that are low income and/or living in poverty.Many adults experiencing intergenerational poverty are employed but unable to meet the needs of their families.Adults and teenagers experiencing intergenerational poverty will be connected to resources that assist them with employment and job training.Funding is projected to be allocated as follows: Advantage Services,Provisional Support Employment Program,$60,250 Planned Activities International Rescue Committee(IRC),Digital Skills Program,$54,400 First Step House,Employment Preparation&Placement,$41,700 Neighborhood House,Early Education Program,$38,449 Project Name CDBG Public Services: Behavioral Health Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Behavioral Health Needs Addressed Public Services: Expand Opportunity/Self-Sufficiency Funding CDBG:$48,000 Description Public Service activities that provide a behavioral health component for the City. Target Date Matrix Code 05M National Objective LMC Estimate the number 299 adults living at or near the poverty level are expected to benefit from proposed activities.This and type of families that will benefit from includes refugees,recent immigrants,homeless individuals,persons with a disability,victims of domestic the roposed activities violence and other vulnerable adults. Location Description Citywide with a focus on assisting residents in behavioral health programming. 411Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Activities will provide access to behavioral health programs,with an added benefit of connection to stable housing opportunities and building self-resiliency. Planned Activities First Step House,Peer Support Services,$48,000 Project Name CDBG: Housing Citywide Target Area T a West Side Target Area Goals Supported Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Development&Preservation Funding CDBG:$2,087,652 Description Funding for eligible activities that provide housing rehabilitation,emergency home repair,and accessibility modifications for eligible households. Target Date Matrix Code 14A National Objective LMH Estimate the number 369 low and moderate-income households are expected to benefit from proposed activities.Funding will and type of families that will benefit from be targeted to elderly,disabled,low-income,racial/ethnic minorities,single-parent,and large-family the proposed activities households.This may include,but is not limited to,multi-family housing or single-family housing. Location Description Citywide with a focus on assisting residents in racial and ethnic concentrated areas of poverty and local target areas. Activities will provide essential housing rehabilitation,emergency repair,and accessibility modifications to address health/safety/welfare issues for eligible homeowners.Assistance will be provided as grants or low-interest loans.Funding is projected to be allocated as follows: ASSIST Inc.—Community Design Center,Emergency Home Repair;Accessibility and Community Design,$700,000 Community Development Corp.of Utah,Affordable Housing and Revitalization,$74,800 The Road Home,Palmer Court Rehab.,$101,000 Planned Activities SLC Housing and Neighborhood Development,Housing Rehabilitation and Homebuyer Program, $600,000 SLC Housing and Neighborhood Development,Targeted Repairs Program,$500,000 SLC Housing and Neighborhood Development,Small Repair Program,$60,000 Set Aside Salt Lake City Housing Project,$51,852 421Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Project Name CDBG: Build Community Resiliency-Economic Development Target Area West Side Target Area Goals supported Build Community Resiliency Needs Addressed Support access to building community resiliency by providing opportunities for small businesses to thrive Funding CDBG:$502,000 Description Funding for eligible activities that provide commercial rehabilitation in local target areas. Target Date Matrix Code 14E National Objective LMA Estimate the number and type of families 20 businesses that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Targeted outreach in West Side Target Area Description Activities will include grants and forgivable loans/grants for businesses located in the West Side target areas to make exterior fagade improvements and to correct code violations.Eligible costs include labor, materials,supplies,and soft costs relating to the commercial rehabilitation.Planned activities are as Planned Activities follows: Salt Lake City Housing and Neighborhood Development:$502,000 Project Name CDBG: Public Services:Transportation Target Area Citywide Goals supported Transportation Needs Addressed Support access to transportation prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations,by offering reduced-fare transit passes to individuals experiencing homelessness. . tnding CDBG:$34,700 scription Funding will be utilized to promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal transportation options. rget Date trix Code 05E National Objective LMC 431Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Estimate the number and type of families 165 individuals that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide. Support access to transportation prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations,by offering reduced-fare transit passes to individuals experiencing homelessness. Planned Activities Salt Lake City Transportation,HIVE Pass Will Call,$45,000 Project Name CDBG:Transportation F a CltyWlde ported Transportation Support access to transportation prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations, by Needs Addressed constructing new bus stops,shelters and related facilities along bus routes through LMI areas of Salt Lake City. Funding CDBG:$322,000 Description Funding will be utilized to promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal transportation options. Target Date Matrix Code 03Z National Objective LMC Estimate the number and type of families 60,350 individuals that will benefit from the ro osed activities Location See map—Selected routes through LMI neighborhoods in Salt Lake City,based on census tracts. Description Planned Activities Funding will be utilized to created bus stops, boarding islands,bus shelters and related amenities,with specific attention to creating accessible bus stops,along routes through LMI areas of the city. Salt Lake City Transportation, Route 4 Frequent Transit Route—Bus Stops&Shelter,$322,000 Project Name CDBG:Administration Target Area N/A Goals Supported Administration Needs Addressed Funding CDBG:$703,733 441Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Description Funding will be utilized for general management,oversight,and coordination of Salt Lake City's CDBG program. Target Date Matrix Code 21A National Objective Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Planned Activities Activities will include program administration and overall program management,coordination, monitoring,reporting and evaluation. Project Name ESG21 Salt Lake City Target Area Countywide Goals Supported Homeless Services Needs Addressed Homeless:Mitigation, Prevention,Public Services Funding ESG:$308,717 Funding will be utilized for homeless prevention to prevent individuals and families from moving into Description homelessness,and for rapid re-housing to move families out of homelessness. In addition,funding will be utilized for emergency shelter,shelter diversion,outreach and other essential services for homeless individuals and families. Target Date Matrix Code 03T National Objective LMC Proposed activities will prevent individuals and families from moving into homelessness;provide rapid rehousing to quickly move families out of homelessness;and provide day-to-day services for individuals Estimate the number and families experiencing homelessness as follows and type of families that will benefit from Part 1 ESG: Shelter Operations,Outreach,Day-to-Day Services: 1,446individuals the proposed activities Part 2 ESG: Prevention,Rapid Rehousing,Diversion: 220individuals Location Description Countywide 1. Activities will prevent household from moving into homelessness and move homeless families quickly into permanent,stable housing through the following eligible costs:utilities,rental application fees,security/utility deposits, rental fees,housing placement fees, housing stability case management, Planned Activities and other eligible costs.Fundingis projected to be allocated as follows: Utah Community Action, Rapid Rehousing Program,$82,022 451Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Utah Community Action,Diversion Program,$40,000 2. Activities will provide emergency shelter and other essential services for individuals and families experiencing homelessness.Services include outpatient health services,homeless resource centers, and transitional housing.Funding is projected to be allocated as follows: First Step House,Homeless Resource Center Behavioral Health Treatment Services,$49.250 Volunteers of America,Utah,Geraldine King Women's Resource Center,$30,000 Volunteers of America,Utah,Homeless Youth Resource Center,$44,000 Catholic Community Services:Weigand Resource Center; Client Intake/Operations,$41,000 3. In addition,$22,445 will be utilized for program administration for general management,oversight, and In of the City's ESG program. Project Name HOME:Tenant Based Rental Assistance Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Housing Needs Addressed Access to affordable housing Funding HOME:$367,669 Description Funding will be utilized to provide tenant-based rental assistance housing to homeless and at-risk of homeless individuals and families. Target Date Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from gg families will benefit from the proposed activities. the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Activities will provide tenant-based rental assistance to homeless,disabled persons and other vulnerable populations.Funding is projected to be allocated as follows: Planned Activities [Utah Community Action Program,TBRA: $167,669 The Road Home,TBRA: $200,000 Project Name HOME: Down Payment and Deposit Assistance Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Development&Preservation 461Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Funding HOME:$200,000 Description Funding will be utilized to provide low-interest loans and/or grants for down payment assistance and/or closing costs to eligible homebuyers. Target Date Estimate the number and type of families 13 households will benefit from proposed activities. that will benefit from the ro osed activities Location Description Citywide Direct financial assistance to eligible homebuyers in the form of down payment low-interest loans and/or grants.Funding is projected to be allocated as follows: Planned Activities Community Development Corp.of Utah,Down Payment Assistance:$200,000 Project Name HOME:Salt Lake City Home Development Fund Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Development&Preservation Funding HOME:$984,634 Description Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition,new construction,and rehabilitation of existing housing. Target Date Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from At least 7 households are to benefit from proposed activities. the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition,new construction,and rehabilitation of multi-family properties and single-family homes. Planned Activities SLC Housing and Neighborhood Dev,HOME Development Fund:$984,634 Project Name HOME:Administration tT7.rg.ta Citywide Goals Supported Administration Needs Addressed 471Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Funding HOME:$97,486 Description Funding will be utilized for general management,oversight and coordination of Salt Lake City's HOME program. Target Date Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the ro osed activities Location Description Planned Activities Activities will include program administration and overall program management,coordination, monitoring,reporting and evaluation. Project Name HOPWA21 Salt Lake City Target Area Metropolitan Statistical Area Goals Supported Housing Needs Addressed Access to affordable housing Funding HOPWA:$674,671 Funding will be utilized to provide housing and related services to persons with HIV/AIDS and their Description families.Activities include,TBRA, Housing Information Services,Permanent Housing Placement, STRMU,and supportive services. Target Date Persons living with HIV/AIDS and their families are expected to benefit from the proposed activities as follows: Supportive Services,36 households Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities STRMU/PHP/Supportive Services,25 households TBRA,56 households Location Description Salt Lake City Metropolitan Statistical Area Activities will include project-based rental assistance,tenant-based rental assistance,short-term rental/mortgage/utility assistance,housing information services, permanent housing placement,and supportive services for persons living with HIV/AIDS and their families.Funding is projected to be allocated as follows: Housing Authority of the County of Salt Lake,TBRA,$489,332 Planned Activities Utah Community Action Program,STRMU, PHP,Supportive Services,$85,099 Utah AIDS Foundation,Supportive Services,$30,000 6 481Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Utah AIDS Foundation,Mental Health Services,$50,000 In addition,Salt Lake City will utilize$20,240 in program administration for general management, oversight and coordination of the Salt Lake City MSA HOPWA program. Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs As entitlement funding decreased considerably over the past decade,the City is taking a strategic approach to directing funding. Priorities include expanding affordable housing opportunities throughout the City, providing critical services for the City's most vulnerable residents, expanding self-sufficiency for at-risk populations,and improving neighborhood conditions in concentrated areas of poverty. The City and partners are unable to fully address needs due to a lack of funding and resources.To address the lack of resources,the City will continue to engage with community development organizations, housing providers, housing developers, service providers, community councils, City departments, local businesses, residents,and other stakeholders to develop strategies for increasing impacts and meeting gaps in services. AP-50 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION 91.200(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement(including areas of low-income and minority concentration)where assistance will be directed Locally-defined target areas provide an opportunity to maximize impact and align HUD funding with existing investment while simultaneously addressing neighborhoods with the most severe needs. According to HUD standards,a Local Target Area is designed to allow for a locally targeted approach to the investment of CDBG and other federal funds. The target area for the entirety of the associated Consolidated Plan period,will be identified as,"West Side Target Area", as shown on the map below. CDBG and other federal funding will be concentrated, but not necessarily limited to,the target area. Neighborhood and community nodes will be identified and targeted to maximized community impact and drive further neighborhood investment. During this Annual Action Plan period, infrastructure projects such as transportation projects and commercial fagade 491Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN improvements will be limited to this target area. Housing activities will happen citywide, however, a more concentrated marketing strategy for rehabilitation efforts will be deployed in the West Side Target Area as an opportunity to expand housing stability. FIGURE:2020-2024 WEST SIDE CDBG TARGET AREA o a e 1 2 AHIeB Legend ®SLC Target Area Salt Lake City Boundary N I•� W Bltr N ••� r/ E 3rd N r Jet Sat Lars Clty a00 S 8 b t300S e _ b j� W 2100 S Swth Sat(.it a s Sat Lake aty Swth Salt LaMa S u—E-, .ttt l bhe G-E- a star 1. DS USDA.USGS,A—GRID,IGN.and GIS Ustu Salt Lake Citys HUD entitlement funds are geographically distributed with the following priorities: The CDBG program's primary objective is to promote the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, suitable living environments and expanded economic activities to persons of low-and moderate-income.To support the CDBG program's primary objectives, Salt Lake City is taking a two-pronged approach to the distribution of funding: 501Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 1. Direct funding to local target areas to build capacity and expand resources within concentrated areas of poverty. 2. Utilize funding citywide, in accordance with meeting a national objective,to support the city's most vulnerable populations, including the chronically homeless, homeless families,food- insecure individuals,the disabled, persons living with HIV/AIDS,victims of domestic violence and the low-income elderly. The ESG program's primary objective is to assist individuals and families regain housing stability after experiencing a housing or homelessness crisis. ESG funding is distributed citywide to support emergency shelter, day services, resource centers, rapid re-housing and homeless prevention activities.The majority of funding is target to Salt Lake City's urban core,as this is where the highest concentration of homeless services are located. The HOME program's primary objective is to create affordable housing opportunities for low-income households. HOME funding is distributed citywide to provide direct financial assistance to homebuyers, tenant-based rental assistance,acquisition, and rehabilitation. The HOPWA program's primary objective is to provide housing assistance and related supportive services to persons living with HIV/AIDS and their families. HOPWA funding is distributed throughout the Salt Lake City MSA, including Salt Lake,Summit, and Tooele counties,to provide project-based rental assistance, tenant-based rental assistance,short-term rental assistance, and supportive services.The majority of funding is utilized in Salt Lake County,as the majority of HIV/AIDS services are located in the Salt Lake a rea. TABLE:GEOGRPAHIC DISTRIBUTION Target Area %of Funds 1 1 West Side CDBG Target Area 20% Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically The Target Area was identified through an extensive process that analyzed local poverty rates, low-and moderate-income rates, neighborhood conditions, citizen input, and available resources. A fair housing equity assessment completed in May 2018 by the Kern C. Gardner Policy Institute at the University of Utah states that there is a housing shortage in Utah,with the supply of new homes and SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN existing"for sale"homes falling short of demand.While the impact of higher housing prices is widespread,affecting buyers, sellers,and renters in all income groups,the report concludes that those households below the median income,and particularly low-income households, are disproportionately hurt by higher housing prices. In fact, households with incomes below the median have a 1 in 5 chance of a severe housing cost-burden, paying at least 50%of their income toward housing,while households with incomes above the median have a 1 in 130 chance.' Discussion The City's west side and central corridor continue to have economic disparities that can be addressed through investments of CDBG funding. Expanding and building upon the target areas of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan,will allow the City to continue to focus resources in a meaningful way. The City has increased its investment in the target area from 12% in the first year,to 20% in the second year. The City will look to grow investment in the target area in future years, ultimately ended up closer to 35%on an annual basis.While not limited to the target area, housing rehabilitation efforts will be heavily marketed in the target area. For the 2021-2022 Action Plan,this includes efforts of partners such as ASSIST, NeighborWorks Salt Lake, and Salt Lake City's Housing& Neighborhood Development(HAND). Each organization provides housing rehabilitation services targeted to low-to-moderate income households. Marketing these programs will help ensure that aging housing stock does not fall into disrepair or become blighted.Throughout this Plan period and beyond,the City will leverage and strategically target funding for neighborhood improvements,transportation improvements, and economic development to maximize impact within targeted neighborhoods. James Wood,Dejan Eskic and D.J.Benway,Gardner Business Review, What Rapidly Rising Prices Mean for Housing Affordability May 2018. 521P c SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-55 AFFORDABLE HOUSING Introduction The Salt Lake City's Housing and Neighborhood Development Division (HAND)is committed to lessening the current housing crisis that is affecting Salt Lake City, as in all U.S. cities,through a range of robust policy and project initiatives to improve housing affordability for all residents,with an emphasis on households earning 40%AMI or below. During the 2021-2022 program year, Salt Lake City will support housing activities through all four of its federal grant programs: CDBG, ESG, HOME,and HOPWA, but for the sake of clarify,the numbers listed below are being derived specifically from the CDBG and HOME program goals. Second Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless: 74 Non-Homeless: 707 Special Needs: 123 TOTAL: 904 Second Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through Rental Assistance: 87 The Production of New Units: 7 Rehab of Existing Units: 635 Acquisition of Existing Units: 13 TOTAL: 742 Discussion To guide Salt Lake City's affordable housing goals, in December 2017,the City approved Growing SLC,A Five-Year Housing Plan, 2018-2022,a data-driven strategy for ensuring long-term affordability and preservation,while balancing the unique need of the City's neighborhoods. Salt Lake City will support affordable housing activities in the coming year by utilizing the following federal community development funding programs: CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA.Affordable housing activities will provide subsidies for individuals and families ranging from 0%to 80%AMI.Activities will include: • Tenant-based rental assistance; • Short-term rental/utility assistance; 531Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Rapid re-housing; • Homeowner housing rehabilitation; and • Direct down payment assistance for eligible homebuyers. An analysis of Salt Lake City's homebuyer market demonstrates a reasonable range of low-income households will continue to qualify for mortgage financing assistance: • US Census data, Salt Lake City, 2000-2018: o The median home values increased 89.8%,from $152,400 to $289,200 o The median household income increased by 52.6%,from $36,944 in 2000 to $56,370 in 2018 • HUD, HOME Income Guidelines for 2020, Salt Lake County, 80%AMI for a family of 4: $73,750 • ACS data, Salt Lake City, 2015-2019: o The number of households earning$50,000 -$74,999, under the poverty line: 16.6%of total population o The average monthly owner costs with a mortgage, $1,601 • Utah RealEstate.com,from July 2020 to March 2021, number of Salt Lake City homes sold between $100,000-$299,999: 271. AP-60 PUBLIC HOUSING Introduction The Housing Authority of Salt Lake City(HASLC)is responsible for managing the public housing inventory, developing new affordable housing units and administering the Housing Choice voucher programs for the City.The Authority strives to provide affordable housing opportunities throughout the community by developing new or rehabilitating existing housing that is safe, decent, and affordable -a place where a person's income level or background cannot be identified by the neighborhood in which they live. In addition to the development and rehabilitation of units,the HASLC also manages several properties emphasizing safe, decent, and affordable housing that provides an enjoyable living environment that is free from discrimination, efficient to operate, and remains an asset to the community.The HASLC maintains a strong financial portfolio to ensure flexibility, sustainability, and continued access to affordable tax credits,foundations, and grant resources. 541P �i �c SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN As an administrator of the City's Housing Choice voucher programs,the Housing Choice Voucher Program provides rental assistance to low-income families(50%of area median income and below).This program provides rental subsidies to over 2,900 low-income families, disabled, elderly,and chronically homeless clients. Other programs under the Housing Choice umbrella include: Housing Choice Moderate Rehabilitation; Housing Choice New Construction; Project Based Vouchers; Multifamily Project Based Vouchers;Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Vouchers; Housing Opportunities for Persons with HIV/AIDS; and Shelter plus Care Vouchers. Under these other Housing Choice programs,the HASLC provided rental subsidies to additional qualified program participants. Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing HASLC continues to build a strong portfolio of new properties and aggressively apply for additional vouchers.As part of a strategic planning process held with Commissioners, staff,and residential leaders, HASLC has also identified several goals for 2021-2022.Among these goals are increased focus on assisting local leaders and agencies respond to homelessness in the City as well as developing and attaining more capacity for additional living units through real estate activities, rehabilitation, pursuing new Shared Housing(previously referred to as Single Room Occupancy) projects, developing increased relationships and services targeting and attracting landlords, and sophisticated management of HUD programs. HASLC also utilizes HUD Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD)to preserve and improve their many properties. In 2021, HASLC is close to the completion on Capitol Homes which will provide 62 housing units for individuals and families under 55%AMI with set-asides for previously homeless,victims of domestic violence, and veterans. HASLC continues to look for ways to expand their portfolio by identifying challenging properties and continuing to develop catalytic and transformative projects and programming. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership Both HASLC and Housing Connect, previously Salt Lake County Housing Authority, have active monthly tenant meetings and encourage participation in management decisions related to the specific housing communities. Housing Connect has a Resident Advisory Board that has representatives from public housing, Section 8, and special needs programs.A member of the Resident Advisory Board is appointed to the Housing Connect's Board of Commissioners. HASLC operates Family Self-Sufficiency programs that address areas of improving personal finances and homeownership preparation for voucher recipients. 551Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance Housing Connect and HASLC are both designated as high performers. AP-65 HOMELESS & OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS ACTIVITIES Introduction Salt Lake City works with a large homeless services community to reduce the number of persons experiencing homelessness, reduce the length of time individuals experience homelessness, increase successful transitions out of homelessness, and reduce the number of instances that clients may return to homelessness. Salt Lake City representatives participate in the local Salt Lake County Continuum of Care's(CoQ executive board and its prioritization committee specifically, so the Continuum of Care's priorities are considered during Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)allocations.The three local ESG funders also meet regularly to coordinate ESG and CoC activities to ensure an accurate level of funding is provided to match the community's service needs and goals.Additionally,the City participates in Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness and the State Homeless Coordinating Council to further coordinate efforts. The Salt Lake County CoC contracts with the State of Utah to administer the Utah Homeless Management Information System(HMIS).All service agencies in the region and the rest of the state are under a uniform data standard for HUD reporting and local ESG funders.All ESG funded organizations participate in HMIS. Representatives from Salt Lake City sits on the HMIS Steering Committee. HMIS data allows Salt Lake City and its partners to track the effectiveness of programs and gauge the continuing service needs of the community. The State of Utah, in coordination with local service providers and volunteers, conduct an annual Point-In- Time count at the end of January to count sheltered (emergency shelter and transitional housing)and unsheltered homeless individuals. Unsheltered homeless individuals are counted by canvassing volunteers.The volunteers use the VI-SPDAT assessment tool to interview and try to connect unsheltered homeless individuals into services. 561Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Describe the jurisdictions second-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including reaching out to homeless persons(especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs Salt Lake City's primary homeless services goal is to help homeless individuals and families get off the street and into permanent housing. In the short term, Salt Lake City will continue to provide collaborative services to the homeless population. Salt Lake City recognizes that not every homeless individual is alike and because of that,there is no one size fits all solution.There is a wide variety of homeless subpopulations in the greater community. Each of these groups have different needs that Salt Lake City focuses on to provide the best services possible. There are groups of chronic homeless individuals,veterans,families,women with children,youth, and homeless-by-choice in the greater community. Each of these groups have different needs and each stage of homelessness must also be considered.The four stages of homelessness are prevention(keeping people from dropping into homelessness with jobs and affordable housing), homelessness(helping with daily needs- lockers, showers, etc.),transcending homelessness(finding housing, employment), and preventing recurrence(offering supportive services to housing). If the four stages are not considered for each group, efforts will eventually be unsuccessful. Personalized one-on-one outreach to homeless individuals providing information about the specific services that individual needs(e.g., housing, mental health treatment,a hot meal) is the most effective outreach approach. Salt Lake City is exploring how to introduce lived experience peer support assistance as outreach teams work with unsheltered homeless individuals. Salt Lake City works regularly with various community partners that provide outreach and assessment of individuals experiencing homelessness including Catholic Community Services,Volunteers of America,the Department of Veterans Affairs,The Road Home,and others. In 2016,Salt Lake City opened the Community Connection Center (CCC) located in the primary homeless services area of the City.The CCC operates as a drop-in center and employs social workers that assess individuals'needs and help connect people with available housing and supportive services.The CCC has been successful in filling the need for additional homeless outreach and case management services in the City. For the City's 2020 Community Engagement Survey, HAND staff distributed paper surveys to the three HRCs and the Homeless Youth Resource Center to collect responses from individuals experiencing 571Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN homelessness.A total of 138 responses were collected and taken into consideration in the development of this 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons Starting with the State of Utah's Ten-Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness, most efforts to deal with homelessness in Utah rely on the Housing First model.Although the ten-year plan has sunset, the programs and direction are still being implemented throughout the State.The premise of Housing First is that once homeless individuals have housing,they are more likely to seek and continue receiving services and can search for employment.The Housing First model has been effective in Salt Lake City,though meeting the varied housing needs of this population can be challenging.The homeless housing market needs more permanent supportive housing, housing vouchers, affordable non-supportive housing, and housing located near transit and services. Salt Lake City is working towards new solutions in these areas as outlined in the City's adopted five-year housing plan, Growing SLC. There is a continued need for day services to meet the basic needs of persons experiencing homelessness. Needed daytime services include bathrooms, laundry, safe storage for their life's belongings, mail receipt, and an indoor area to"hang out". Salt Lake City addresses these issues by supporting shelters, day services, and providing a free storage program.These things were all considered in the recent creation of the homeless resource centers.These centers also provide food services and look to be all inclusive, one stop shop for services and connection to community resources.This shift in how homeless services are provided will help the community realize our goal that homelessness is rare, brief,and non-recurring. Salt Lake City will continue aiming to assist homeless persons make the transition to permanent housing, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness,facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again. The City plays an important role by providing strategic funding for the valuable efforts undertaken by other stakeholders and, at times,filling in gaps in essential services.The City can also lend its voice and political weight to lobby for changes in policy, regulation, and statutes as needed to facilitate a comprehensive and effective approach to addressing homelessness and related issues. 581Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Salt Lake City's adopted housing plan, Growing SLC, includes efforts to provide affordable housing options along with the spectrum of housing including permanent supportive housing,transition in place, tenant based rental assistance, and affordable non-supportive housing. The Salt Lake County Collective Impact to End Homelessness Steering Committee, and the Salt Lake County Continuum of Care voted in support of merging these two entities into a new homeless system structure called the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness.This Coalition's primary goals are to prevent and end homelessness in the Salt Lake Valley through a system-wide commitment of resources, services, data collection, analysis and coordination among all stakeholders. Salt Lake City staff play a key role in assisting this effort as it moves forward. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2020 and 2021 the community homeless planning organizations and the homeless service providers, adeptly pivoted and evolved to the precautions and recommendation from national and local health officials to mitigate COVID-19 transmission. Coordinated efforts included: physical barriers, mask enforcement, limited gatherings, enhancing cleaning of facilitates, remote staffing,virtual case management, and new non-congregant shelter options in the form of an unused senior retirement center and two hotels. Greatly assisting these efforts was the availability and usage of HUD waivers and CARES Act ESG-CV, CDBG-CV, and HOPWA-CV funding. Helping homeless persons(especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children,veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness,facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again Salt Lake City and its service partners work with homeless individuals to help them successfully transition from living on the streets or shelters and into permanent housing or independent living. Salt Lake City has been working with service partners and other governmental agencies through the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness(SLVCEH).This includes work on various subgroups that focus on specific areas of service, including housing and coordinated entry. Salt Lake City has the goal to help streamline service delivery to the homeless community with the express purpose of shortening the period that individuals and families experience homelessness. 591Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Salt Lake City has also funded the creation of new permanent supportive housing units and programs which serve the most vulnerable members of our community. Progress is being made on both goals. Salt Lake City and its partner,the Road Home, are continuing to operate the House 20 program.The House 20 program engages with some of the most vulnerable members of our community,the majority of whom are now in stable housing.Through the City's Funding Our Future efforts,the City has funded a variety of housing programs that aim to fill in gaps in services in our community.These programs include a new shared housing pilot program and housing programs which target families with children, individuals with substance abuse disorders, refugees, and victims of domestic violence. Salt Lake City has provided funding to support the creation of a combined 280 new units of permanent supportive housing that are at various stages of development in the City,which includes the Magnolia,a new construction project of 65 units for homeless individuals scheduled for completion in in 2021. These permanent supportive housing units have been identified by the Salt Lake Continuum of Care as a need in the larger homeless services community. Salt Lake City continues to make progress on our 5-year housing plan, Growing SLC,which seeks to improve the housing market in the City by focusing on three primary goals: • Reforming City practices to promote a responsive, affordable high-opportunity housing market; • Increasing housing opportunities for cost-burdened households; and • Building a more equitable city. Through implementation of Growing SLC and the funding of housing programs through Funding our Future and federal dollars, Salt Lake City is working to increase access to affordable housing units for individuals and families experiencing homelessness.These efforts will help shorten the period of time individuals and families experience homeless and prevent recently homeless individuals and families from falling back into homelessness. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care(such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs 601Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Salt Lake City,along with other organizations in the Salt Lake County Continuum of Care,work to prevent and divert individuals and families from experiencing homelessness. Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County and the State of Utah all provide funding to Utah Community Action for short-term rental assistance to families at risk of falling into homelessness. Salt Lake City supports the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness, 2020 Strategic Plan's goal of implementing release/discharge best practices and policies, and providing resources to individuals being discharged from incarceration who are at risk of becoming homeless.Additionally,Salt Lake City has identified strategies in our 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan goal, Build Community Resiliency,to assist individuals exiting treatment centers/programs and/or institutions. Discussion Salt Lake City is reducing and ending homelessness in the community through strong collaborations with partner organizations throughout the Salt Lake County Continuum of Care. Salt Lake City works closely with Salt Lake County,the State of Utah and service providers to stop families from dropping into homelessness, reduce the length of time individuals and families experience homelessness, help individuals and families successfully transition out of homelessness,and keep individuals and families from rescinding back into homelessness. AP-70 HOPWA GOALS Second year goals for the number of households to be provided housing through the use of HOPWA for Short-term Rent, Mortgage,and Utility Assistance Payments: 25 Tenant-Based Rental Assistance: 51 Units Provided in Permanent Housing Facilities Developed, Leased, or 0 Operated with HOPWA Funds: Units provided in Transitional Short-Term Housing Facilities Developed, 0 Leased, or Operated with HOPWA Funds: TOTAL: 76 AP-75 ACTION PLAN BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING 611Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Introduction As discussed in sections MA-40 and SP-55 of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, several barriers to the development and preservation of affordable housing exist within Salt Lake City, including the following: • Land costs • Construction costs • Housing and transportation costs • Development and rehabilitation financing • Housing rehabilitation complexities • Foreclosures and loan modifications • Neighborhood market conditions • Economic conditions • Land use regulations • Development fees and assessments • Permit processing procedures • Environmental review procedures • Lack of zoning and development incentives • Complicated impact fee waiver process • Competition for limited development incentives • Landlord tenant policies • NIMBY'ism While not all of these barriers can be addressed with federal funding, during the 2021-2022 program year, the City will work to reduce barriers to affordable housing through the following planning efforts and initiatives: • Growing SLC:A Five-Year Plan,2018-2022:The City has formally adopted a housing plan that is addressing the barriers listed above and has served as a catalyst on a local and regional level to focus on the housing crisis.The plan provides an assessment of citywide housing needs,with emphasis on the availability and affordability of housing, housing needs for changing demographics,and neighborhood-specific needs. Growing SLC identifies several goals to remove barriers to affordable housing.Those goals include reforming City practices to promote a responsive, affordable, high-opportunity housing market; increase housing opportunities for cost-burdened households; and building a more equitable City. 621Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Homeless Strategies: Salt Lake City works collaboratively with service providers, local municipalities,the State of Utah,the Continuum of Care, and other stakeholders through the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness(Coalition)to ensure a regional and concerted effort to address homeless issues within the City.The structure of the Coalition provides a succinct network for data collection, resource deployment, and service implementation.The City will continue to play a critical and visionary role in the Coalition in the coming year. • Home Ownership Options:The City has launched a new program for homeownership,Welcome Home SLC.The program provides low-to moderate-income families the opportunity to purchase a home in Salt Lake City. It will help stabilize communities, provide incentive for neighborhood investments, and allow families to build wealth. • Community Land Trust(CLT): Salt Lake City has launched a Community Land Trust that will allow donated and trusted land to maintain perpetual affordability while ensuring the structure on the land,the home, is purchased, owned,and sold overtime to income-qualifying households,just as any other home would be. By holding the land itself in the trust,the land effectively receives a write down each time the home is sold, insulating the property for growing land costs but still allowing equity to be built by the homeowner.There have been eleven properties added to the CLT since 2018. • Funding Our Future:Will provide additional funding during 2021-2022 to increase housing opportunities in Salt Lake City through a 5%sales tax increase approved by Council in May 2018. • Leverage Public Land:The City has been and will continue to look at City owned properties as an investment in affordable housing.Additionally, proceeds from development on public land could be used for future affordable housing development. • Redevelopment Agency:The Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency has committed over$70 million since 2010 to address affordable housing efforts in the City,with a specific focus on areas with high land values. • Housing Trust Fund:The Housing Trust Fund was created in 2000 to provide financial assistance to support the development and preservation of affordable and special needs housing in Salt Lake City. Eligible activities include acquisition, new construction, and rehabilitation of both multifamily rental properties and single-family homeownership.Additional assistance relating to housing for eligible households also may include project or tenant-based rental assistance, down payment assistance and technical assistance. • Policy:The City is continually evaluating policies that may impede the development of affordable housing.A few policy changes the City is considering over the coming year include an Affordable 631Pagc SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Housing Overlay zoning ordinance, Housing Loss Mitigation ordinance amendment, and a Single Room Occupancy(SRO)/Shared Housing ordinance. Actions planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges,growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment Salt Lake City will work to remove or ameliorate public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing through the following efforts: • Affordable Housing Development Incentives: Zoning and fee waiver incentives will be implemented and/or strengthened, including the following: o Review the City's Housing Loss Mitigation ordinance to ensure that the city's stock of inexpensive housing isn't rapidly being replaced by more expensive units. o Develop an Affordable Housing Overlay zone that allows for and provides incentives for the creation and preservation of affordable housing. o Evaluate the desire for a Single Room Occupancy(SRO)/Shared Housing ordinance that allows for SRO's in single-family neighborhoods throughout the City. o Off-Street Parking Ordinance update to improve pedestrian-scale development and amenities. o Low-Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning amendments to remove local zoning barriers to housing density and types of housing. • Leverage Public Resources for Affordable Housing Development: Public resources, including city- owned land,will be leveraged with private resources for affordable housing development. • Funding Targeting:The Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development is evaluating ways to coordinate and target affordable housing subsidies more effectively,to include the coordination of local funding sources(Olene Walker Housing Loan Fund, Salt Lake City Housing Trust Fund, Salt Lake County funding, etc.). • Implement Fair Housing Action Items: Salt Lake City will work to remove and/or ameliorate housing impediments for protected classes through action items as identified in the City's Fair Housing Action Plan as outlined in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. 641Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Utilize Federal Funding to Expand Affordable Housing Opportunities: Utilize CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funding to expand housing opportunity through homeowner rehabilitation, emergency home repair,acquisition/rehabilitation, direct financial assistance,tenant-based rental assistance, project-based rental assistance, and rapid re-housing. AP-85 OTHER ACTIONS Introduction This section outlines Salt Lake City's efforts to carry out the following: • Address obstacles to meeting underserved needs • Foster and maintain affordable housing • Reduce lead-based paint hazards • Reduce the number of poverty-level families • Develop institutional structure • Enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies • Radon Mitigation Policy Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The most substantial impediment in meeting underserved needs is a lack of funding and resources. Strategic shifts identified through Salt Lake City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan provide a framework for maximizing and leveraging the City's block grant allocations better focus funding to address underserved needs. Underserved needs and strategic actions are as follows: Underserved Need:Affordable housing • Actions: Salt Lake City is utilizing federal and local resources to expand both rental and homeownership opportunities. In addition,the City is utilizing public land to leverage private capital for the development of affordable housing.These efforts will work to address the affordable housing gap in Salt Lake City. Underserved Need: Homelessness • Actions: Salt Lake City is working with housing and homeless service providers to coordinate and streamline processes for service delivery. By utilizing the VI-SPDAT pre-screen survey, providers 651Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN can access and prioritize services based on chronicity and medical vulnerability.These efforts will assist in addressing unmet needs by utilizing resources more effectively. Underserved Need: Special needs individuals. • Actions: Salt Lake City is working to address underserved needs for refugees, immigrants,the elderly,victims of domestic violence, persons living with HIV/AIDS, and persons with a disability by providing resources for basic needs, as well as resources to expand self-sufficiency. For example,federal funding is utilized to provide early childhood education for refugees and other at-risk children; improve immediate and long-term outcomes for persons living with HIV/AIDS; and provide job training vulnerable populations; and provide medical services for at risk populations. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing The City is committed to foster and maintain affordable housing throughout our City.This is evident through identifying specific gaps that exist in the community,and then designing affordable housing efforts specifically to address these needs.The City aims to target households earning 80%AMI and below,with emphasis on households earning 40%AMI and below. Through the housing initiatives and efforts identified in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, Salt Lake City aims to: • Address the City's affordable housing shortage for those most in need. • Address housing needs for Salt Lake City's changing demographics. • Address neighborhood specific needs, including the following: o Protect affordability in neighborhoods where affordability is disappearing. o Promote affordability in neighborhoods with a lack of affordable housing. • Preserve the City's existing affordable housing stock. • Strengthen the Citys relationship with our housing partners,financial institutions,and foundations. • Support those who develop and advocate for affordable housing. Toward this end, Salt Lake City will foster and maintain affordable housing during the 2021-2022 program year through the following actions: • Utilize CDBG funding to support owner-occupied rehabilitation for households at 80%AMI and below. • Utilize CDBG and HOME funding for acquisition and rehabilitation of dilapidated and blighted housing. 661Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Utilize ESG, HOME,and HOPWA funding to create housing opportunities for individuals and households at 30%AMI and below through Tenant-Based Rental Assistance and Rapid Re- Housing. • Utilize CDBG and HOME funding for direct financial assistance to homebuyers at 80%AMI and below. • Promote the development of affordable housing with low-income housing tax credits, Salt Lake City Housing Trust Fund, Olene Walker Housing Loan Fund, Salt Lake City's HOME Development Fund and other funding sources. • Leverage public resources, including publicly owned land, with private capital for the development of affordable housing. • Work to ameliorate and/or eliminate housing impediments for protected classes as outlined in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan's Fair Housing Action Plan. • Work to leverage other city resources such as Redevelopment Agency funding/strategies, maximize sales tax housing funding, and other sources as they are identified with federal funding where applicable. • Salt Lake City launched a Community Land Trust that currently has ten properties,with plans to increase the number of properties in the coming years. Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards Because of the high percentage of the housing units in Salt Lake City that were built before 1978, outreach and education efforts must continue.As such, the City has implemented a plan to address lead issues in our residential rehabilitation projects.The City's Housing Rehabilitation Program is in- compliance with HUD's rules concerning identification and treatment of lead hazards. During the 2021- 2022 program year, Salt Lake City will work in conjunction with our partners on the state and county levels to educate the public on the dangers posed by lead based paint,to include the following: • Undertake outreach efforts through direct mailings,the Salt Lake City website,various fairs and public events,and the local community councils. • Provide materials in Spanish to increase lead-based paint hazard awareness in minority communities. • Partner with Salt Lake County's Lead Safe Salt Lake program to treat lead hazards in the homes of children identified as having elevated blood levels. • Emphasize lead hazards in our initial contacts with homeowners needing rehabilitation. 671Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Work with community partners to encourage local contractors to obtain worker certifications for their employees and sub-contractors. Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families In a strategic effort to reduce the number of households living in poverty and prevent households at risk of moving towards poverty from doing so,Salt Lake City is focusing on a two-pronged approach: 1. Creating neighborhoods of opportunity to build capacity and expand resources within concentrated areas of poverty. 2. Support the citys most vulnerable populations, including the chronically homeless, homeless families,food-insecure individuals,the disabled, persons living with HIV/AIDS,victims of domestic violence and the low-income elderly. The City's anti-poverty strategy aims to close the gap in a number of socioeconomic indicators, such as improving housing affordability,school-readiness of young children, employment skills of at-risk adults, access to transportation for low-income households,and access to fresh foods for food-insecure families. Efforts will focus on the following objectives: • Assist low-income individuals to maximize their incomes. • Reduce the linkages between poor health and poverty. • Expand housing opportunities. • Reduce the impacts of poverty on children. • Ensure that vulnerable populations have access to supportive services. Federal entitlement funds allocated through this 2021-2022 Action Plan will support the City's anti-poverty strategy through the following efforts: • Provide job training for vulnerable populations. • Provide early childhood education to limit the effects of intergenerational poverty. • Provide essential supportive services for vulnerable populations. • Provide housing rehabilitation for low-income homeowners. • Expanded affordable housing opportunities. • Improved neighborhood/commercial infrastructure in West Side Target Area. • Enhance support for small businesses and micro-enterprise businesses. • Reduce food insecurities for low-income households. 681Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Actions planned to develop institutional structure As outlined in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, Salt Lake City is building upon the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and continuing to take a coordinated and strategic shift in allocating federal entitlement funds to place a stronger emphasis on community needs,goals, objectives and outcomes. This includes the following efforts to strengthen and develop institutional structure: • Geographically target infrastructure and economic development funding to areas of the city with higher poverty rates, lower incomes, and/or reduced access to transportation. • Increase coordination between housing and supportive service providers to reduce/eliminate duplicative efforts, encourage partnerships, increase transparency, and standardize processes. • Strengthen support for the City's most vulnerable populations, including the chronically homeless, homeless families, individuals with disabilities, persons living with HIV/AIDS,victims of domestic violence and the low-income elderly. • Support housing efforts that connect residents with supportive services and programs that improve self-sufficiency. • Offer technical assistance to agencies implementing projects with CDBG, ESG, HOME, and/or HOPWA funding to ensure compliance and support of program objectives. • Support employee training and certifications to expand the internal knowledge base on HUD programs, as well as housing and community development best practices. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies Salt Lake City recognizes the importance of coordination between supportive service and housing providers in meeting priority needs. Stakeholders have been working towards developing and implementing a streamlined and effective delivery system to include the following efforts: • Created and implemented a no wrong door approach to accessing housing and other services. • Increased coordination through the Salt Lake County's Continuum of Care, Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness,the Utah Homeless Management Information System, and State Homeless Coordinating Council. • Coordinated assessments to help individuals and families experiencing homeless move through the system faster. • Coordinated diversion and homeless prevention resources to reduce new entries into homelessness. 691Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Coordinated efforts to house the highest users of the homeless services and provide trauma informed case management. • Improved weekly"housing triage"meetings that provide a format for developing a housing plan for homeless individuals and families with the most urgent housing needs. Discussion Actions planned to mitigate impacts of Radon Salt Lake City is committed to providing safe, affordable housing opportunities that are free of contaminations that could affect the health and safety of occupants. Section 50.3(i)states that"it is HUD policy that all property proposed for use in HUD programs be free of hazardous materials, contamination, toxic chemicals and gasses,and radioactive substances,where a hazard could affect the health and safety of occupants of conflict with the intended utilization of the property."To that end,the City created a Radon Mitigation Policy that address the potential of Radon in homes that are newly constructed or rehabilitated utilizing federal funding issued through this Annual Action Plan.The City has,and will continue,to provide technical assistance to each agency in an effort to ensure agencies are properly identifying sites that must be tested, how to test correctly, how to read test results, and the appropriate mitigation standards that must be followed. The Radon Mitigation Policy includes specifics on testing and mitigation requirements.The City has also partnered with the State of Utah to implement the mitigation policy, provide technical assistance, and outreach/education materials.To leverage resources,the City will refer clients needing financial assistance for mitigation to other community resources.To ensure that even the most vulnerable and high-risk populations have an opportunity to mitigate Radon,the City has implemented a grant program whereby residents meeting a set of criteria, may apply for a grant to bear the costs of mitigation. AP-90 PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 91.220(I)(1,2,4) 701Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Introduction Salt Lake City's program specific requirements for CDBG, HOME, and ESG are outlined as follows. Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1) 1. Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table.The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out 1 The total amount of anticipated program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not $1,500,000 yet been reprogrammed. 2 The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific 0 objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 3 The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements. 0 4 The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or 0 plan. 5 The amount of income from float-funded activities. 0 Total Program Income: $1,500,000 2. Other CDBG Requirements 1 The amount of urgent need activities 0 2 The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities 90% that benefit persons of low-and moderate-income Overall Benefit-A consecutive period of one,two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70%of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low-and moderate-income.This Annual Action Plan covers a one-year period. HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) 711Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(2) 1. A description of other forms of investment being used beyond those identified in Section 92.205 is as follows Salt Lake City does not utilize HOME funding beyond those identified in Section 92.205. 2. A description of the guidelines that will be used for resale or recapture of HOME funds when used for homebuyer activities as required in 92.254,is as follows In order to preserve the number of affordable housing units for continued benefit to low-income residents, Salt Lake City requires that HOME funds used to assist homeownership be recaptured whenever assisted units become vacant prior to the end of the affordability period that is commensurate with the amount of funding invested in the activity.Trust deeds or property restrictions are filed on appropriate properties to ensure compliance with the period of affordability. Homeownership Recapture: Salt Lake City follows the HOME recapture provisions established at§92.253(a)(5)(ii).Any remaining HOME assistance to the homebuyer must be recovered if the housing does not continue to be the principal residence of the family for the duration of the period of affordability.The HOME investment that is subject to recapture is based on the direct subsidy amount which includes the HOME assistance that enabled the home buyer to buy the housing unit. In all cases,the recapture provisions are limited to the net proceeds of the sale. Salt Lake City requires all sub-recipients and Community Housing Development Organizations(CHDO)to follow the same recapture guidelines as outlined and required in the HOME rule. This provision is intended to ensure a fair return on investment for the homeowner if a sale occurs during the period of affordability. The City will utilize one of the following options: A) If it was determined that HOME regulations were not adhered to for initial approval of the homeowner or during the term of affordability,the entire HOME subsidy will be recaptured. B) In the event of change of title/ownership,the City will reduce the HOME investment amount to be recaptured on a pro-rata basis for the time the homeowner has owned and occupied the housing measured against the applicable affordability period. C) If the net proceeds are not sufficient to recapture the appropriate HOME investment plus enable the homeowner to recover the amount of the homeowner's down payment and any capital improvement investment made by the owner since purchase,the City will share the net proceeds. Net proceeds are the sales price minus loan repayment(other 721Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN than HOME funds)and closing costs.The net proceeds will be divided proportionally on a pro-rata basis for the time the homeowner has owned and occupied the housing measured against the applicable affordability period. Owner investment returned first. The City may choose to permit the homebuyer to recover the homebuyer's entire investment(down payment and capital improvements made by the owner since purchase) before recapturing the HOME investment. HOME Funds Provided for Homebuyer Activity Minimum years subj ect to Recapture of HOME Funds of Affordability Under$15000 5 Years Between$1 and $40,000 10 Years Over$40,000 15 Years Homeownership Resale: Resale requirements will only apply to HOME-funded affordable homeownership opportunities provided using the Community Land Trust model. In that model, Salt Lake City provides funding to a Community Land Trust to sell homes at an affordable price while placing a 99-year leasehold on the estate. Resale provisions will be enforced by a recorded covenant signed by the landowner,the homebuyer, and the City,and through a 99-year ground lease between the landowner(the trust)and the homebuyer. Under both the covenant and the ground lease,the home may be sold only to an income-qualified buyer who will occupy the home as a primary residence.The landowner,through the ground lease, shall have an option to purchase to ensure that the home is sold to an eligible buyer at an affordable price.This provision is intended to ensure a fair return on investment for the homeowner if a sale occurs during the period of affordability.The Resale Requirement will limit the sales price, as described below. Due to the growing costs of homes in the Salt Lake City residential market, the City has opted to implement a Homeownership Value Limit of$440,800 for a single-family home. Salt Lake City determined 95 percent of the median area purchase price for single family housing in the jurisdiction in accordance with procedures established at§ 92.254(a)(2)(iii). Specifically,this purchase price was calculated based on a median sales price of$464,000 (i.e. $464,000x 0.95 = $$440,800)for single family homes.This figure is for both new construction and existing homes. An analysis of Salt Lake City's homebuyer market demonstrates a reasonable range of low-income households will continue to qualify for mortgage financing assistance: 731Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • US Census data,Salt Lake City, 2000-2018: o The median home values increased 89.8%,from $152,400 to $289,200 o The median household income increased by 52.6%,from $36,944 in 2000 to $56,370 • HUD, HOME Income Guidelines for 2021, Salt Lake County, 80%AMI for a family of 4: $73,750 • US Census data, Salt Lake City, 2014-2018: o The number of households earning$50,000-$74,999: 13,991 households, 17.9% of total population o The average monthly owner costs with a mortgage, $1,534 • Utah RealEstate.com,from July 2020 through March 2021,the number of Salt Lake City listings between $100,000-$449,999: 1,392 3. A description of the guidelines for resale or recapture that ensures the affordability of units acquired with HOME funds?See 24 CFR 92.254(a)(4)are as follows As stated above,Salt Lake City requires that HOME funds be recaptured whenever assisted units become vacant prior to the end of the affordability period that is commensurate with the amount of funding invested in the activity. In very rare cases,Salt Lake City will use HOME funds as an acquisition source for multifamily projects.With these rental activities, rental projects must meet the appropriate period of affordability or HOME funds provided to them will be recaptured by the City. Trust deeds or property restrictions are filed on appropriate properties to ensure compliance with the period of affordability. Rental Housing Recapture: All HOME-assisted units must meet the affordability requirements for not less than the applicable period specified below regardless of the term of any loan or mortgage,transfer of ownership, or repayment of loan funds. Rental Housing Activity Minimum years of Affordability Rehab or acquisition of existing housing per unit 5 Years amount of HOME funds under$15,000 Between$15,000 and $40,000 10 Years Over$40,000 or rehab involving refinancing 15 Years New construction or acquisition of newly 20 Years constructed housing 741Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 4. Plans for using HOME funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated with HOME funds along with a description of the refinancing guidelines required that will be used under 24 CFR 92.206(b),are as follows Salt Lake City does not use HOME, or CDBG,funds to refinance debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated. Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(4) 1. Include written standards for providing ESG assistance(may include as attachment) The Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG) Policies include written standards for providing ESG assistance. Salt Lake City's updated ESG policies and procedures are attached to this Annual Action Plan. 2. If the Continuum of Care has established centralized or coordinated assessment system that meets HUD requirements, describe that centralized or coordinated assessment system The Salt Lake Continuum of Care has developed a collaborative,written coordinated assessment plan. Consensus exists for a coordinated assessment plan that covers the entire Continuum of Care with a multi-access entry point quick assessment method for any homeless individual or family in need of emergency shelter or service. Our 2-1-1 system, service providers,government agencies,and others publicize all existing access points, striving to do everything we can to ensure individuals and families in need have clear direction for accessing appropriate services.After entry into an emergency service, individuals are tracked as they progress toward housing and/or support interventions.All homeless families and those individuals prioritized for permanent supportive housing placements are guided toward this centralized process and placed into one of several housing programs depending on assessment. Standardized assessments include a quick assessment for emergency services and eligibility and enrollment materials for housing placements. Representatives of the City worked with the CoC, ESG funders, and service providers to improve the coordinated assessment system to meet requirements set forth in Notice CPD-17-01.The new coordinated assessment system was approved by the Salt Lake County Homeless Coordinating Committee(aka the Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness) in January 2018. Salt Lake City is continuing to work with the CoC, ESG funders,and service providers to operationalize these new requirements through the Coordinated Entry Task Group. 751Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 3. Identify the process for making sub-awards and describe how the ESG allocation available to private nonprofit organizations(including community and faith-based organizations)will be allocated Granting sub-awards is an intensive, months-long process. It begins with applications being made available and education workshops held to explain different federal grant programs and eligible activities under each. Staff also reaches out to potential applicants through the Salt Lake Homeless Coordinating Council,the local Continuum of Care,the Utah Housing Coalition, and others. After the application period closes,a general needs hearing is conducted to help guide how ESG monies should be spent.Applications are discussed with a rident advisory board in a public forum.Applicants are invited to meet with the resident advisory board to answer final questions or provide additional information regarding their programs and their role in the larger homeless services system structure. The Community Development&Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board (CDCIP Board) reviews the ESG applications and makes a recommendation to the Salt Lake City Mayor based on federal guidelines,the 5 Year Consolidated Plan, and the City's long-term homeless services strategies.The Mayor then makes a recommendation on funding to the City Council based on the CDCIP board recommendation,federal guidelines,the 5 Year Consolidated Plan,and the City's long-term homeless services strategies. The City Council holds a public hearing for comment on the programs and proposed benefits of each.The City Council then makes a funding decision based on public comment, the Mayor's recommendation, federal guidelines,the 5 Year Consolidated Plan,and the City's long-term homeless services strategies. 4. If the jurisdiction is unable to meet the homeless participation requirement in 24 CFR 576.405(a),the jurisdiction must specify its plan for reaching out to and consulting with homeless or formerly homeless individuals in considering policies and funding decisions regarding facilities and services funded under ESG Before the Salt Lake City Council makes the final funding decisions for ESG funds,there are multiple venues for public outreach including two public hearings. Efforts are made to include participation from homeless and formerly homeless individuals. Emergency Solutions Grant funds, along with other public and private monies, are used by Salt Lake City to implement our short-and long-term homeless service goals. 761Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Individuals experiencing homelessness often help the city craft and implement short-term and long-term service plans. Below are a few examples of how the city has created the opportunity for homeless persons to participate: • Homeless individuals participated in the creation of the long-term homeless services situation assessment. • The City interviewed over 100 homeless individuals as part of its Homeless Services Site Evaluation Commission in 2015. • Summer of 2016,the City held a workshop specifically with individuals experiencing homelessness to draft the criteria used to locate new homeless resource centers. • February 2017,a workshop was held with homeless individuals to gain feedback on the design, location, and programming at new homeless resource centers. • March 2018, Salt Lake City participated in a Homeless Youth Forum,which brought together a wide range of service providers together to discuss service delivery for homeless youth.There were approximately 20 homeless and formerly homeless youth who were dispersed amongst the discussion groups and they provided valuable feedback on various service delivery systems. • Summer of 2018,the City coordinated with Salt Lake County to collect survey data on funding priorities from individuals experiencing homelessness on two separate occasions. • Summer of 2020,the City collected Community Engagement Surveys at the three Homeless Resource Center and the Homeless Youth Resource Center. • The City continues to reach out to persons with"lived experience"to help shape the services being prioritized and funded throughout the homeless services system. ESG subgrantees and other homeless service providers routinely consult with current and formerly homeless individuals to make programming and service delivery decisions. S. Describe performance standards for evaluating ESG Salt Lake City scores programs receiving Emergency Solutions Grant funding using the performance metrics required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)and local priorities. To increase transparency, leverage resources,and maximize efficiencies, Salt Lake City does the following: • All applications undergo a risk analysis prior to the awarding of funds. 771Page SALT LAKE CITY 2021-2022 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN • Standardized quarterly reporting is reviewed for compliance,timeliness,and accuracy. • Monitoring and technical assistance risk analyses are performed on all subgrantees to determine which organization would benefit from monitoring or technical assistance visits. • Collect information that supports the required performance measurement metrics and provides context on local initiatives. To ensure consistent performance metrics,the Salt Lake County Continuum of Care contracts with the State of Utah to administer Utah's Homeless Management Information System (HMIS).All service agencies in the region and the rest of the state are under a uniform data standard for HUD reporting and local ESG funders.All ESG funded organizations participate in HMIS. Salt Lake City reviews HMIS data to ensure grantees are properly using funds as promised in their contracts and meeting larger City, Continuum of Care,and State goals. 781Page EXHIBIT "B" HOME-ARP Allocation Plan [Draft attached as Exhibit A to Transmittal.] 4 Item C2 ;•••• 0 MOTION SHEET :/i,,,y -- _ CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ivy ii� •_'t°'.-• ii � I�'� iip TO: City Council Members FROM: Sam Owen,Policy Analyst DATE: March 21,2023 RE: Ordinance:Amending the Zoning Text Pertaining to the use of Landscape Materials MOTION i I move the Council adopt the ordinance. MOTION 2 I move the Council not adopt the ordinance. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor �' � and NEIGHBORHOODS �' =x Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL L,5 (Dec 22,202211:58 MST) Date Received: 12/22/2022 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 12/22/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: December 22, 2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community &Neighborhoods SUBJECT: PLNPCM2022-01055 Landscaping Modifications Required to be an Eligible City to Qualify for Rebates. STAFF CONTACT: Nick Norris, Planning Director at nick.norris(c slcgov.com or 801-535- 6173 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Planning Commission recommendation to approve the proposal. BUDGET IMPACT: none BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This proposal modifies 21A.48 Landscaping of the zoning code in order for Salt Lake City to become an eligible city for grant programs related to replacing turf with more appropriate water wise landscaping. There are currently two rebate programs offered, one through the Utah Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and one through the Central Utah Water Conservancy District(CUWCD). The DNR rebate program was a pilot program in 2021 that was funded by an allocation from the Utah Legislature. The DNR program requires rebate applicants to own property in a qualifying city. A qualifying city is one that has adopted landscaping provisions that prohibit turf in park strips or other areas that are less than eight feet in width and that limit the total amount of turf to no more than 3 5% of the landscaped area in a front or side yard. More information can be found here: https:Hconservewater.utah.gov/grass-removal-rebates/ SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 The CUWCD rebate program has similar requirements, but also requires certain provisions related to sprinkler valve controllers, turf for non-residential uses, and turf on steep slopes. This rebate program requires cities to include in their landscaping regulations provisions that include: • Limits turf in residential uses to no more than 35% of the landscaped area; • Limits turf in multi-family, commercial, industrial, and institutional uses to no more than 20% of the landscaped area. • Prohibits turf in areas that have a minimum dimension of less than eight feet • Prohibits turf on slopes greater than 25% • Prohibits the use of aerial sprinkler heads in areas with turf that are less than eight feet • Requires a smartsense sprinkler controller The proposed ordinance includes a complete list of changes. This rebate program is requiring that landscape codes be updated by March 1, 2023 for residents of the city to be eligible for the rebates. CUWCD indicated that Salt Lake City residents are the largest recipient of their rebate programs. The landscape regulations are going through a comprehensive update. However, these modifications were pulled out of the proposal to try to have the proposal adopted before the March 1, 2023 deadline or at least reduce the time that the city is not listed as an eligible city. These changes will be incorporated into the more comprehensive proposal. PUBLIC PROCESS: This proposal is subject to the required 45-day engagement period that is required prior to the first public hearing. The 45-day notice period began in late October and ran through December 13, 2022. Notice of the proposal was sent to all recognized organizations and emailed to the Planning Division list serve. Comments that were received are included in the Planning Commission staff report. Comments received after the Planning Commission public hearing are attached to this transmittal. There was one comment submitted that indicated that turf can be watered with an underground system that eliminates water waste. However, the requirements that need to be adopted do not include this type of exception. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of December 14, 2022 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of December 14, 2022 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of December 14, 2022 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3) Original Petition 4) Public Comment Received After Publishing of Planning Commission Staff Report SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Amending the zoning text of Section 21A.48.050 and definitions in Title 21A associated therewith of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the use of landscape materials) An ordinance amending the text of Section 21A.48.050 and definitions in Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the use of landscape materials pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-01050. WHEREAS, on December 14, 2022, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission ("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin Mendenhall to amend land use regulations pertaining to water wise landscaping materials for new development(Petition No. PLNPCM2022-01050); and WHEREAS, at its December 14, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council") on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Section 21A.48.050. That Section 21A.48.050 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Landscaping and Buffers), shall be and hereby is amended read as follows: 21A.48.050: DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Landscape plans shall be prepared based on the following design standards and guidelines. The standards and guidelines apply to all new development and redevelopment of a residential, commercial, institutional, or manufacturing use and all associated landscaped areas as identified by this chapter. The standards and guidelines also apply when a landscaping plan is required to be submitted by this chapter. Design standards are numerically measurable design requirements that can be definitively evaluated for compliance. Design guidelines are not precisely measurable, but 1 compliance can be determined through the evaluation process of landscape plan review. The evaluation and approval of landscape plans shall be based on compliance with both the design standards and guidelines. A. Design Standards At Time Of Planting: 1. Deciduous Trees: All deciduous trees shall have a minimum trunk size of two inches (2") in caliper,unless otherwise specified. 2. Evergreen Trees: All evergreen trees shall have a minimum size of five feet (5') in height, unless otherwise specified. 3. Ornamental Trees: All ornamental trees shall have a minimum trunk size of one and one-half inches (11/2") in caliper,unless otherwise specified. 4. Shrubs: All shrubs shall have a minimum height or spread of eighteen inches (18") depending on the plant's natural growth habit,unless otherwise specified. Plants in five (5) gallon containers will generally comply with this standard. 5. Drought Tolerant Species: Site conditions in Salt Lake City are generally arid, and the selection of plant species suited to dry conditions is appropriate. To promote water conservation, not less than eighty percent (80%) of the trees and eighty percent(80%) of the shrubs used on a site shall be drought tolerant species that can withstand dry conditions once established. The city has compiled a list titled "Water Conserving Plants For Salt Lake City", that may be locally available. 6. Street Trees: Trees located within the public right of way are subject to the following provisions: a. The pruning or removal of trees is prohibited without the approval of the urban forester or designee. b. Cutting, Removal, Or Damage Prohibited: Trees shall not be cut, removed,pushed over, killed, or otherwise damaged without the approval of the urban forester or designee. c. The root zone of all street trees shall be protected when impacted by any construction work on the abutting property or any work within the right of way when a street tree is present. Root zone protection is subject to approval from the urban forester or designee. d. All street trees shall be provided with an irrigation system that has the capability of providing adequate and efficient water to each street tree as determined by the urban forester or designee. 7. Limitations on Turf: a. For single family and two-family uses turf shall not exceed 35%, of the area to be covered with vegetation. For yards and areas required to include 2 vegetation where the 35% calculation would result in a number less than 250 square feet, the property may have a maximum of 250 square feet of turf. Active recreation areas are exempt from this provision. b. For multi-family uses turf shall not exceed 20% of the area to be covered with vegetation. Active recreation areas are exempt from this provision. c. For commercial, industrial, and institutional uses, turf shall not exceed 20% of the area to be covered with vegetation. Active recreation areas are exempt from this provision. d. Areas planted with turf shall not be less than eight feet wide at the narrowest point. This applies to any required yard, landscaped yard, landscape buffer, park strip, and parking lot landscaping. e. Turf shall not be installed on any slope greater than 25% or where the rise of the slope is more than one vertical foot for every four horizontal feet. 8. Mulch: At least 3-4 inches of mulch,permeable to air and water, shall be used in planting beds and in landscaped areas that are not covered with vegetation or other allowed inorganic surfaces to control weeds and improve the appearance of the landscaping. Fiber barriers and plastic sheeting that are not porous to air and water are prohibited. 9. Automatic Irrigation Controller Required. Irrigation systems are required to use an irrigation controller that includes a Watersense label that can automatically adjust the frequency and/or duration of irrigation in response to changing weather conditions and be equipped with an automatic rain delay or rain shut-off capabilities. B. Design Guidelines: 1. Scale And Nature Of Landscaping Material: The scale and nature of landscaping materials shall be appropriate to the size of the structures. Large scale buildings, for example, should generally be complemented by larger scale plants. 2. Selection Of Plants: Plants shall be selected for form, texture, color, pattern of growth and adaptability to local conditions. 3. Evergreens: Evergreens should be incorporated into the landscape treatment of a site, particularly in those areas where screening and buffer is required. 4. Softening Of Walls And Fences: Plants shall be placed intermittently against long expanses of building walls, fences, and other barriers to create a softening effect. 3 5. Detention/Retention Basins And Ponds: Detention/retention basins and ponds shall be landscaped. Such landscaping may include shade and ornamental trees, evergreens, shrubbery, hedges, tarf, ground cover and/or other plant materials. 6. Irrigation Systems: All irrigation systems shall comply with the following requirements: a. All irrigation shall be appropriate for the designated plant material and achieves the highest water efficiency. b. Drip irrigation or bubblers shall be used except in turf areas. Drip irrigation systems shall be equipped with a pressure regulator, filter, flush-end assembly, and any other appropriate components. c. Each irrigation valve shall irrigate landscaping with similar site, slope and soil conditions, and plant materials with similar watering needs. Turf and planting beds shall be irrigated on separate irrigation valves. In addition, drip emitters and sprinklers shall be placed on separate irrigation valves. 7. Energy Conservation: Plant placement shall be designed to reduce the energy consumption needs of the development. a. Deciduous trees should be placed on the south and west sides of buildings to provide shade from the summer sun. b. Evergreens and other plant materials should be concentrated on the north side of buildings to dissipate the effect of winter winds. 8. Berming: Earthen berms and existing topographic features should be, whenever determined practical by the zoning administrator, incorporated into the landscape treatment of a site, particularly when combined with plant material to facilitate screening. SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Section 21A.62.040. That the definition of Turf in Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended read as follows: TURF: Grasses planted as a ground cover that may be mowed and maintained to be used as a lawn area of landscaping_Does not include decorative grasses, grasses that are native to the local environment or grasses that do not generally require supplemental water, or inorganic substitutes commonly referred to as artificial turf. SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Section 21A.60.020. That Section 21A.60.020 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended to include the following two (2) terms: Active Recreation Areas 4 Mulch SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Section 21A.60.040. That definitions of the terms "Active Recreation Areas" and"Mulch"be added to Section 2 IA.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code as follows: ACTIVE RECREATION AREAS: Areas of the landscape dedicated to active play where turf may be used as the playing surface. This may include sports fields,play areas, golf courses, and other similar areas where turf is commonly used as the surface for outdoor activities. MULCH: Any material such as rock,bark, compost, wood chips or other materials left loose and applied to the soil. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR 5 CITY RECORDER (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM Bill NO. Of 2023. Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Published: December 16, 2022 Ordinance Amending Section 21A.48.050 Landscape Materials Date: By: Katherine D.Pasker,Senior City Attorney 6 I. CHRONOLOGY October 27, 2022 Petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall. October 28,2022 45-day engagement period started;notice emailed to all recognized community organizations along with draft proposal. November 14, 2022 Online open house information posted. December 1,2022 Public notice mailed,emailed, and posted on State Public Notice website for Planning Commission Public Hearing on December 14,2022. December 7,2022 Staff report posted on Planning Commission Agenda webpage. December 13,2022 45-day public engagement period ended. December 14,2022 Planning Commission Public Hearing held. 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2022-01055 On December 14, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted to recommend approval of the proposed modifications to 21A.48 Landscaping of the Salt Lake City Zoning Code. The proposed modifications are being requested in order for the City to be listed as an "eligible city" by entities that provide rebates for property owners who replace turf with more water-wise landscaping. If the changes are not adopted, property owners would not be eligible to receive the rebates. The proposal includes placing limits on the amount of turf that can be planted based on use, size of landscaped area, and slope and makes other similar changes required to be considered an eligible city. The City Council may amend other related chapters and sections of Title 21A Zoning as part of this proposal. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petitions. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TBD TIME: 7:00 PM PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street,Room 326,Salt Lake City,Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means,while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street,Room 326,Salt Lake City, Utah.For more information,including WebEx connection information,please visit www.sle.2ov/councit/virtual-meetin2s.Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments(aslc2ov.com.All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Nick Norris (801) 535-6173 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m, Monday through Friday, or via email at nick.norris@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/,by selecting the"planning"tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2022-01055 People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation,which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.commentskslcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. Original Petition MEMORANDUM PLANNtNGDrVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNM and NEIGHBORHOODS TO: Mayor Erin Mendenhall ca Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Otfioer Blake Thomas,DepalUnerlt of Community and Neighborhoods Director,Michaela OIGay,Deputy Planning Director From: Nick Norris,Planning Director Late: October 20.2022 Re: Updates to landscape regulations In March 2023 the Utah Water Conservancy District will launch new requirements for their rebate programs that provide reimbursement for property owners who remove sod and replace it with more appropriate landscaping for our local climate.One of the requirements for the reimbursement program is that cities within their service area,including Salt Lake City,must have adopted landscaping regulations that include specific requirements.The Salt Lake City zoning ordinance includes most of these requirements,however there are two key provisions that need to be added to our code for property owners to be eligible to utilize the incentives: • A prohibition of using sod or aerial sprinkler heads on areas that are less than eight feet in any dimension. • Limiting the amount of sod for nonresidential uses to no more than 25%of a required landscape area. UWCD instructed us that these two provisions are required to be adopted prior to March 1,2023. If they are not,then our property owners would not be eligible for the incentives. UWCD informed us that Salt Lake City property owners are the largest users of their rebate programs. To ensure that there is not a gap in eligibility,the Planning Division would like to request that you initiate a petition to start the process as soon as possible. Please note that this will be a separate action from updating the entire landscaping regulation chapter.That work is in progress and our goal is to have that to the council in time to adopt prior to the 2023 growing season.There is potential risk that if we relied on that process to add these provisions that it will not be adopted prior to March I,2o23. Running this in a condensed time frame allows us to get something to the council so they can act prior to March I. This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that is the decided course of action. If the decided course of action is to not initiate the application,the signature block can remain blank Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made to not initiate the petition. Please contact me at ext.6173 or nick.norrLs(dslmov xom if you have any questions.Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above. n - (o- Z-7• ZZ Erin Mendenhall,Mayor Date SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET.ROOM 406 VAIWV.SLC.GOV PO BOX 1454W SALT LAKE CITY.UT 84114-64W TEL 801-SW7757 FAX 001-5 3 54 1 74 4. Public Comment Received After Publishing Planning Commission Staff Report Sugar House COMMUNITY COUNCIL December 9, 2022 TO: Salt Lake City Planning Commission FROM: Judi Short, First Vice Chair and Land Use Chair Sugar House Community Council RE: PLNPCM20202-01050 Landscape Regulation Modifications Needed to Quality for Rebates We have read this proposal and have no problems with it. Salt Lake City residents should be able to qualify for rebates provided by other entities for replacing turf with water wise landscaping. We understand the main changes being proposed are: • Prohibiting turf in areas that are less than eight feet in width at the narrowest point; • Limiting turf to no more than 35%of the total landscaped area for residential uses, with a carve out for small lots where the yard areas required to be landscaped are less than 250 square feet; • Prohibiting turf on slopes greater than 25%•Limiting turf to no more than 25% of the total landscaped area for commercial, industrial, instituti onal, and multi-family development common areas. • Limitations on types of sprinklers used in narrow landscaped areas. All of us who worry about having enough water ought to be looking to convert our lawns and gardens into waterwise irrigation and plants, if we haven't already done so.We look forward to reading the complete chapter of the landscape code. In the meantime,we approve this revision so that we can continue to be eligible for rebates. Letter to PC from SHCC 2900 S 900 E ADU www.sugarhousecouncil.org 1 From: James Webster To: Norris,Nick Subject: (EXTERNAL)Credit underground drip for sod Date: Monday,December 12,2022 6:12:37 PM The 85 ac District commercial project in S.Jordan is entirely irrigated with Netafim drip under sod. Water consumption is comparable,or less than SLC's proposed irrigation concepts for non-sodded areas pending design and equipment. I was the landscape architect for the District. Jim Webster,RLA Sent from my iPhone Item C3 .•••' � ' ••••. MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO: City Council Members FROM: Allison Rowland Budget and Policy Analyst DATE: March 21, 2023 RE: ORDINANCE:THE GLENDALE REGIONAL PARK PLAN MOTION 1—ADOPT ORDINANCE I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the Glendale Regional Park Plan as part of Salt Lake City's general plan. Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the following statement but may if they wish. The ordinance adopting this Plan has been updated to include the following statement on Budget Availability. "The adoption of this master plan serves to identify the goals and objectives of the identified plan area, all of which are subject to future budget appropriations." MOTION 2 —NOT ADOPT I move that the Council not adopt the Salt Lake City Glendale Regional Park Plan, and proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COMM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Adopting the Glendale Regional Park Plan to be part of the city's general plan as a specific plan found in the Westside Master Plan) An ordinance adopting the Glendale Regional Park Plan pertaining to property located at 1131 West 1700 South, 1181 West 1700 South, and portions of properties with a certified address of 1375 West 1700 South and 1220 West 2100 South. The Glendale Regional Park Plan will be part of the Westside Master Plan,which is a component of the city's general plan. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on November 9, 2022 on the proposal prepared by the Salt Lake City Parks and Public Lands Department to adopt a new Glendale Regional Park Plan as part of the city's Westside Master Plan; and WHEREAS, at its November 9, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council") to adopt the Glendale Regional Park Plan, and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Adopting the Glendale Park Regional Park Plan. The Glendale Regional Park Plan (Exhibit A) shall be and hereby is adopted to be part of the Westside Master Plan, a component of the city's general plan as required by Chapter 10-9a of the Utah Code. SECTION 2. Budget Availability. The adoption of this master plan serves to identify the goals and objectives of the identified plan area, all of which are subject to future budget appropriations. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM (SEAL) Salt Lake City Attomey's office Hate:Marc 15, 2023 Bill No. of 2023. By: Published: Pa I C.AelsolSenior City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" Glendale Park Regional Plan ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS MAYOR KRISTIN RiKER DIRECTOR N s - im _ CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Lis R (Jan 9,2023 09:38 MST) Date Received: 01/09/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council:01/09/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 4, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Kristin Riker, Director,Department of Public Lands SUBJECT: Adoption of Glendale Regional Park Plan STAFF CONTACTS: Kat Maus Public Lands Planner Katherine.maus(a)slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Glendale Regional Park Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Salt Lake City Public Lands Department has been working with a consultant,Design Workshop, to develop a plan to guide development of the 17-acre Glendale Regional Park site, formerly known as Raging Waters. Demolition is substantially complete, and a portion of the park must be open to public recreation by April 2024 to meet the requirements of the Land and Water Conservation Fund (https://www.Lips. og v/subjects/lwcf/index.html). The project team has been working to develop the Glendale Regional Park Plan since Summer of 2021,which will provide the guiding vision and design for the future of the old water park site and establish a framework to guide development and programming of the site into the future. The plan relies heavily on Glendale community input and is aimed at representing the unique and diverse culture of the Glendale Community while also including amenities that will create a regional draw SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION WWW.SLCGOV.COM 1965 WEST 500 SOUTH TEL:801-972-7800 SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84104 FAX:801-972-7847 PAGE 1 OF 2 for residents of Salt Lake City. The project team has worked closely with project stakeholders, neighborhood residents, community partners and students at Glendale Middle and Mountain View Elementary Schools to create goals and objectives for the site, and a community-supported vision that reflects the Glendale neighborhood's rich heritage and identity. Over 1,300 people responded to an online city-wide survey,bringing the total participant count for the project to nearly 1,700. Key elements of the plan were informed by public input and at full build out include: • Community Gathering and Event Spaces—a promenade/community plaza spanning the north central gateway, an event stage and lawn, smaller pavilions and picnic lawns and a riverside beach and boardwalk. • Play Places for Everyone -hiking,walking and paved trails, an all-ages and abilities playground, climbing features, multi-use sport courts, dog park, and sledding hill. • Places to Enjoy the Water—a kayak rental, access to the Jordan River for recreation, boat dock and ramp, and an outdoor pool. • Places to Wheel Around - an ice/roller skating ribbon, skateboarding area, and bike trails. The draft plan also looks at specific metrics,based on the original park goals,that measure the plan's success in addressing improvements in ecological function of the site, improvements in access to and within the site, and in creating community spaces for gathering and events. Gauging elements of the final concept plan,through performance-based evaluation,provides a measure to determine if goals set during the beginning of the park planning process are being attained. The Glendale Regional Park Plan draft provides recommendations for site management and restoration during construction, and after, including programming and partnership needs, operations, maintenance, and staffing are also included in the plan draft document. Programming and management will be key to fulfill the park goal of creating a safe community asset. Potential opportunities for addressing management needs include expanding internal Public Lands staff by recommending additional staff to support and activate the park to enhance safety and enjoyment of the space. The plan recommends a full time, on-site programming manager, two part time, seasonal park attendants and allocating associated budget to ensure programming on the site is robust and effective, consisting of programming funds for arts, culture, fitness, entertainment,markets and community festival events. The plan also emphasizes continuing to create and build upon key community partners and stakeholders, engaging with community organizations that promote inclusivity, equity, and partnerships, and working with local and minority-owned businesses to program elements of the site. More information about programming, operations and management recommendations within the plan can be found on page 71 of the draft Master Plan document. PUBLIC PROCESS: Community engagement for the plan process and for the development of the preferred plan used a multi-pronged approach including youth and stakeholder engagement, development of a community advisory committee, online survey and public open house, along with in-person engagement events. The public process began with robust engagement with the Glendale Community and then broadened to a citywide engagement effort. A detailed description of the public engagement efforts can be found at https://www.slc.gov/parks/parks-division/21endale-watelpark/. In brief,the engagement process consisted of three engagement windows: Page 2 of 4 Public Engagement Window 1: The first public engagement window prioritized neighborhood and community stakeholder engagement to ensure the community voice was the guide in establishing the initial vision. Considering the predominately younger population in this area,the project team focused on Glendale Middle School and Mountain View Elementary School students and families,while also engaging community leaders and the Glendale Neighborhood Council. The project team met multiple times with the students, engaged in design charettes and used the direction we received from these 130 students to guide initial plan alternative design. The project team also attended and held several in- person events with the Glendale community and created a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) specifically for this plan creation. The CAC was comprised of members who are considered leaders in the Glendale community and represented a variety of community organizations,businesses and affiliations specifically in the Glendale community. The members of the CAC provided key feedback on the project mission, goals, engagement process and vision for the park and shared information about the planning process with their community. The engagement from Window 1 drove the development of two concept alternatives. Public Engagement Window 2: The two concept alternatives were shared with the public and with City Council. The project team kicked-off broad, citywide public engagement with an open house hosted at the Glendale and Parkview Community Learning Center to open a survey. Residents of Glendale, members of the CAC and the city at large attended the event to orient themselves to the plans. Over 1360 people citywide participated in the survey which informed the development of the final preferred plan for the site. The preferred plan includes community-prioritized features from each of the two concept plans. The project team met again with the CAC to review engagement results and get feedback before moving forward with the final preferred plan. Public Engagement Window 3: The third and final window included sharing out of the final preferred plan and final draft plan for the site with the Parks,Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board(PNUT Board), the CAC and Glendale Neighborhood Council. The final preferred plan was available to the public in July 2022,with the draft plan document becoming available August 25, 2022, initiating the 45 day public noticing period required for Planning Commission. Please see Exhibit B for additional details on engagement events, descriptions, and participation. Additional public comments and responses can be found in the Planning Commission Staff Report of November 9, 2022. Please see Exhibit D for letters of support from the Parks,Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board and Transportation Advisory Board. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: Following the presentation of the Glendale Regional Park Plan to the Planning Commission,the public hearing was opened where the following comments were made: After discussion of the plan and public comments by the Planning Commission and staff, Planning Commissioner Brenda Scheer moved to recommend approval of the plan with the following statement: "Based on the information presented and discussion, I move that the Commission forward a POSITIVE recommendation to the City Council on the fabulous Glendale Regional Park Master Page 3 of 4 Plan with the PROVISO that the City Council pay special attention to operations,maintenance, security, and staffing for the park as it goes into use." The motion passed unanimously. Planning Commission (PC)Records a) PC Agenda of November 9, 2022 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of November 9, 2022 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of November 9, 2022 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: A. Salt Lake City Ordinance B. Public Engagement Chronology C. Glendale Regional Park Plan D. Public Comments Received&Letters of Support Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A Salt Lake City Ordinance SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Adopting the Glendale Regional Park Plan to be part of the city's general plan as a specific plan found in the Westside Master Plan) An ordinance adopting the Glendale Regional Park Plan pertaining to property located at 1131 West 1700 South, 1181 West 1700 South, and portions of properties with a certified address of 1375 West 1700 South and 1220 West 2100 South. The Glendale Regional Park Plan will be part of the Westside Master Plan,which is a component of the city's general plan. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on November 9, 2022 on the proposal prepared by the Salt Lake City Parks and Public Lands Department to adopt a new Glendale Regional Park Plan as part of the city's Westside Master Plan; and WHEREAS, at its November 9, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council") to adopt the Glendale Regional Park Plan, and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Adopting the Glendale Park Regional Park Plan. The Glendale Regional Park Plan (Exhibit A) shall be and hereby is adopted to be part of the Westside Master Plan, a component of the city's general plan as required by Chapter 10-9a of the Utah Code. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM (SEAL) Salt Lake City Attomey's Office Date:November 21, 2022 Bill No. of 2023. By: Published: r 1 C. ielso Senior City Attorney EXHIBIT B Public Engagement Chronology ERIN MENDENHALL Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj Project Event Notes Time Period Community and Neighborhood 3,500 Respondents--Public Survey through the department of 2020 Department Survey Community and Neighborhoods to gauge public interest in the future of the park bVs://www.sic.gov/can/cares/watMark/ SLC Waterpark Commemoration 3841 Respondents—Public Survey to gauge interest in demolition 2020 Survey Report and re-development of the park. https://www.slc.goy/wp-contept/uploads/2021/O 1/Water-Park- Survey-Report-Nov-2020.pdf Glendale Community Council 11 Participants and 3 Community Council Members visioning a 2021 Visioning Exercise potential future for the site Initiation of Formal Planning Public Lands initiates a formal city engagement and planning Spring/ Process by Public Lands department process for the Glendale Regional Park Master Plan supported by Summer Design Workshop as project consultant. 2021 External Stakeholder Engagement: Parents and students were asked at three community events which Fall 2021 Community Events elements from past surveys should be included in the park.Events included:Morning Coffee with 20 respondents;Glendale Scare Fair with around 50 respondents;Hartland 4 Youth and Family Event with 40 respondents External Stakeholder Engagement: Design exercises were led with 88 middle school and 40 fifth grade Fall 2021 Glendale Middle School and students to gather feedback and input on the future design of the Mountain View Elementary site.The process included on-site meetings with 88 Glendale Middle School,"Place-It"activity with University Neighborhood Partners,and collage creation. hqs://multicultural.utah.gov/glendale-youth-as-placemakers Community Advisory Committee A CAC was created to ensure neighborhood representation in the January 2022 Meeting 1 preferred plan and final master plan documents.These stakeholder meetings ensured engagement with westside communities. The first meeting oriented participants to the project and asked for general impressions on the project. Community Advisory Committee This meeting presented two conceptual ideas for the park and February Engagement Meeting 2 sought specific feedback on the ideas and amenities for the future 2022 site. "Plan Your Park"in-person Open Project team worked with Glendale Community Council to host an March 16, House and engagement event at event with over 100 attendees to share with the community the 2022 Community Learning Center concepts that have been generated so far and to launch a public survey. Online Survey Public survey to gather broader feedback on amenities and concept March 16, alternatives receiving 1361 responses. 2022-April 16,2022 PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT vwvw.slc.gov/parks/ 1965 W 500 S PHONE 801-972-7800 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104 FAX 801-972-7847 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor o L9 srn= =Arj Community Advisory Committee This meeting shared the results of the broader survey with the April 12, Engagement Meeting 3 Committee and solicit feedback and impressions on the data. 2022 Community Advisory Committee Final preferred plan sharing and feedback from the CAC,as well as May 31,2022 Engagement Meeting 4 explanation of Phase 1 Presentation to Glendale Sharing of public process and phase 1 implementation projects, Jun 15,2022 Neighborhood Council timeline,and budget Preferred Plan Confirmation Confirm final preferred plan and share with the public. August- October 2022 Presentation of final plan draft to Share final plan document and phasing plan to PNUT Board and September 1, PNUT Board request endorsement 2022 Presentation of final plan to Glendale Share final plan document,preferred plan and phasing strategy to September Neighborhood Council and public the Glendale Community Council and Public;solicit public 21,2022 comment and question Presentation of final plan to Share final plan document and phasing plan to TAB and request October 1, Transportation Advisory Board endorsement 2022 City Council Plan Briefing and Share final plan document,preferred plan and phasing strategy to October 4, Process Summary City Council as a briefing,and to address comments or questions 2022 Public Hearing and Planning Presentation to Planning Commission for plan recommendation to November 9, Commission Presentation and City Council for formal adoption 2022 Recommendation FUTURE ENGAGEMENT:Master Presentation of preferred plan and Master Plan document to City Projected: Plan presentation and adoption Council for adoption. Late 2022- Early 2023 PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT vwvw.slc.gov/parks/ 1965 W 500 S PHONE 801-972-7800 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104 FAX 801-972-7847 EXHIBIT C Glendale Regional Park Plan Glendale EF Regional Park� Master Plan i t All 41 x�ti Q �� it .y ��,4ri` y ' � ° Y• arm � �� +. 'l!. �, °✓ i z,, , 4. ... �� C i✓�, �i.v r. �, -��, ram,. ��4 ''['FA,�' v Z _ T'_ ���y:ir. � �.,� � ,+.���� �I — ; q` '°J`e�`r e/i `,�. ''�,x" � f s����C•; .�r C.-�'i. - _�°��� � jj AIM _ �1 Public LandspVIDEVFNS p p AGRORRA `PNRh DESIGNNNORKSHOP P+++I*�a��+i�.luma.twnoyl� .xopSSOCIpT ES�xc y~ �� yp v •) elic of :w Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................VI INTRODUCTION.................................................... 1 SITE CONTEXT AND ANALYSIS ......................................5 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT......................................25 THE VISION........................................................39 IMPLEMENTATION.................................................57 APPENDICES ......................................................77 � iii W. Acknpwledgel_ Nancy Monteith, Kat Maus, Kristin Riker, Susan Lundmark,Jonathan Goates, Rocio De Maria Torres Mora •- Paulo Aguilera, Melanie Pehrson- Noyce,Teresa Molina, Dane ess,Ivis Garcia,Shay Nieser, Elizabeth Montoya,Amy May,Inoke Hafoka,Abdirizak Ibrahim, Marci Bender, Ifa Motuliki, Edward Castro Bennett, Laura Manycattle i•_ # &9IMP Claire Hempel,Anna Laybourn, Mary Oliver, y,Ishita Ghosh,Conners Ladner, Di Yang • eah Jaramillo, Molly Wireman oward Kozloff, Rodrigo Rodarte • '• Eric McCulley ,y WW" MIN Team Intro Planning, Design 1 /' & Storytelling A'`�` Design Workshop TITLETOWN,GREEN BAY,WI Operations, Maintenance & _r _ f Programming Agora Partners �- ��,� � T yyy ' 1NEER PARK:YOUR DOWNTOWN Community Outreach - r David Evans+Assoc. 441 Ecology and Restoration - } River Restoration Acknowledgement v ILL-SummaryExecutive I- Glendale Regional Park Process Overview 1AMMA Project Background ri Salt Lake City Public Lands(SLC Public Lands)has been presented with the opportunity to redevelop the former Raging Waters/Seven Peaks water park site to better serve the community by providing needed park space and amenities.The water park,defunct and in a state of decay,has no prospective operators and it has become unfeasible to revitalize the once-loved space.Public Lands needs to fulfill a directive,established by the requirements of the Land and Water Conservation Fund,to provide publicly accessible outdoor recreation to the community by 2024. The chance to develop the park is significant as the Salt Lake City Public Land's Master Plan identifies a need for investment in Westside parks and enhancing park spaces along the Jordan River.The master plan specifically calls for the Glendale Regional Park to be improved to create a regional attraction with characteristics that celebrate and preserve community culture and diversity and make water recreation accessible to more people. This document,the Glendale Regional Park Master Plan,shares the planning process, N t research and analysis,community engagement and resulting recommendations to achieve Y � � Y9 r these goals. i Site Context f Glendale Regional Park is a part of Salt Lake City's Westside neighborhoods.The park is a major link in a long chain of parks and open space which are all connected by the Jordan River Parkway,which positions the park to become a key recreation destination along the Jordan River Parkway Trail along with the nearby Glendale Golf Course,1700 S Park and I Glendale Neighborhood Park.The park location also presents an opportunity to increase k access to water recreation and improve essential riparian habitat along the Jordan River. y i I vi I Executive Summary Engagement inclusive play features that all ages and all Implementation SITES pre-score assessment,confirmed abilities can enjoy.Community gathering that the Glendale Park project meets the MissionPark A top goal for SLC Public Lands was to with opportunities for food and local The park will be constructed in a series of qualifications to pursue SITES certification. create a park that is a community park performances was also important feedback phases.According to the requirements set Details of the SITES prescore can be found first,and a regional destination as well. that was shared. by the Land and Water Conservation Fund, on pages 69-70 and in Appendix A. Glendale Regional The planning team wanted to be sure they outdoor recreation amenities in the park bean iconic neighborhood received robust input on community needs The Vision must be available to the public by spring park Mission Statement& and desires from members of the local of 2024.This expedited schedule requires park ' neighborhood and also gather insights on The Glendale Park Master Plan was that Phase I park features are easily Goals preserves park needs from the larger pool of city-wide created through a process of verifying implemented,meet a rapid construction Throughout the process,a Community culture,and diversity. residents.A series of engagement activities park features and design concepts with timeline and fit within the current budget Advisory Committee comprised of local also be • were conducted from October 2021 to May the community.Park ideas were refined allocated for the park.Park features that community members and leaders helped connecting to the Jordan 2022 including: from initial ideas down to two concept plan are most desired by the community and guide the plan to align with the needs alternatives,which were then refined into a can meet this criteria are being given topCit ' • ark Neighborhood and Stakeholder and desires of the Glendale community. Engagement: final park plan. priority for inclusion in Phase I. This committee helped to form a mission network.Making nature • The final design strategy seeks to create an Next Steps statement and goals for the park.For fullrecreation • Glendale Neighborhood Events:3 g gy p e 4 a see oal statements, pg . events,110 participants park that celebrates community gathering g park improve Youth Engagement:Glendale and active recreation with programs and To meet the rapid timeline required to open the natural resources and Middle School and Mountain View activities that are community-driven.The the park with publicly accessible recreation, quality of lives for current Elementary School,128 participants park will be a hub for sharing local food, Phase I design will proceed concurrent and future generations of Community Advisory Committee .to Master Plan adoption Programming art and culture with family,friends and Meetings:3 meetings including 14 opportunities with community partners will •_residents. participating members neighbors. continue to be developed to ensure that the "Plan Sharing"Glendale Community The park will also be a place to explore park remains an active space upon opening. Council:15 participants nature through hillside trails,along the Citywide Engagement: restored riparian landscapes and through The project team will also begin to enhanced access to the Jordan River rehabilitate the site with riparian and Park •' ls "Plan Your Park"Open House:100 native vegetation to fulfill the park goals attendees The park design strengthens regional of enhancing environmental quality andCommunity-Led Public Online Survey:1361 connectivity,connecting Glendale Park to improving environmental justice for the Community participants the larger park system with a proposed Glendale neighborhood.To support these Programming Key takeaways from public input included bridge connection to the Jordan River goals,it is recommended that the project Park Activation&Safety the need for a neighborhood park-like Parkway Trail,improved connections to team pursue certification in a sustainability experience with lots of amenities,the need 1700 South Park such as road narrowing program such as SITES or another Regional Connection for increased safety,and opportunities for and an at-grade pedestrian crossing,and a comparable program.This would ensure Access to Nature free and affordable activities.Other themes recommended multi-use trail connection to sustainable practices are adhered to and Environmental Quality included the desire to have water play in the future Surplus Canal Trail. would highlight the City's investment in the park in the form of a water feature or restorative landscapes,climate resiliency Environmental Justice outdoor pool,a preference for bright and To view the final park plan and park features and equitable environmental investment. colorful park features and a desire for see pages 42 43. During the master planning process,a Executive Summary I vii Introduction Introduction - _ - - A New Park for the Glendale Neighborhood ZZ.z Salt Lake City Public Lands has been presented with the opportunity to redevelop the rV former Raging Waters/Seven Peaks water park site to better serve the community by providing needed park space and amenities.The water park,defunct and in a state of decay, has no prospective operators and it has become unfeasible to revitalize the once-loved space.Public Lands needs to fulfill a directive,established by the site funding requirements of the Land and Water Conservation Fund,to provide publicly accessible outdoor recreation to the community by 2024. The chance to develop the park is significant for several reasons.The Salt Lake City Public __ J T ,`�. ;;.a• "� ' _ "'�- Land's Master Plan identifies a need for investment in Westside parks and enhancing park spaces along the Jordan River.The master plan specifically calls for the Glendale Regional V I Park to be improved to create a regional attraction and event space with characteristics .� ,� that celebrate and preserve community culture and diversity and make water recreation accessible to more people.The Glendale neighborhood is also identified by the Public Lands Needs Assessment as being a high needs area for park investment with a lower frequency ¢' "' of park visitation than parks on the east side of the city. The park site is also significant as it presents an opportunity to increase access to water _ �• recreation and improve essential riparian habitat along the Jordan River,one of the city's greatest natural assets in need of restoration efforts and care.In addition,activating the park will enhance regional connectivity by creating a key recreation destination along the {` tttt Jordan River Parkway Trail along with the nearby Glendale Golf Course,1700 S Park and R� Glendale Neighborhood Park. x a a Goals for the new park include creating a safe,active and communal space that embodies natural elements of the Jordan River and provides new opportunities for recreation, activities and events.This document,the Glendale Regional Park Master Plan shares 1 1 1 1 the planning process,research and analysis,community engagement and resulting r recommendations to achieve these goals.It outlines the Master Plan for the development of the former Glendale Water Park;a 17 acre site,to guide capital improvements,site ,. programming,and operations and maintenance recommendations. 1 1 1 3. it 1 • f 12R✓SST•�� �•� 3 Introduction Park Mission Park Goals Statement Glendale Regional � Community-Led Access to Nature ' 1• / The vision is community led and reflects The park is a space to build a meaningful relationship with nature.Attractive and �� Glendale's culture and history.The park will accessible features and free recreational neighborhood 1• 1-0offer space for social connections,features, activities provided in the neighborhood's thatand services that interest the Westside backyard will combat Nature Deficit celebrates1 '`_ community. Disorder in the community. preserves community, �t 1 diversity. Community Services& Environmental Ctuality Programming It will 1 /• a The park builds upon existing natural assets The park provides equitable access to `�y — and enhances the ecological health of the regional destination nature and outdoor recreation.The Westside.Features of the park will work to community can enjoy free and affordable improve the Jordan River's water quality connecting to the classes,events,and entertainment at the and Salt Lake City's air pollution for the / 1 • , / neighborhood's central park. community. Salt Lake City's park , Park Activation&Safety _ Environmental Justice network. 1 The park is a dynamic destination activated The park celebrates the Jordan River, nature 1 recreation by daily use.What happens in the park is r .� A integral to the community's identity,and an organic expression of Westside culture. '"�� enhances local environmental quality.The within an arm's reach, Local community members,organizations, community-led vision will prioritize the 3�. and businesses together will create a safe quality of life for the Glendale neighborhood the park 1 / - and welcoming environment. and Westside community. ,1. the /natural , / quality of livesRegional Connection for current and The park is a regional destination 1 combining and connecting to multiple future generations of neighboring parks.As a gathering place along the Jordan River,the park serves as Westside residents. a recreational gateway between Westside and the larger park systems. Oi � Introduction 4 Site Context + Analysis Project Context Watershed City-Regional Neighborhood Jordan Jordan River Glendale River Water Park GreatSatt Neighborhood d: Lake Sall Lake CO ao 1700S ... ....... 1215 Industrial 1-15 ........ Areas Glendale Waferl'ark 201 InduskialAteas Oah Lake Glendale Waferl'ark 7 1 Site Context&Analysis Project Context �;, , » .� • Ali,:.I.,fi,l:l:hl wu::i.r.nt �#w, ' :�,: ��I'r+� 34••%, i Watershed ' asr,:�:.�::..•r-,:.,...xY, ::�:�., .�i.�.w 1 r,..•a r and improve water quality in the river.The I. ■I a«• ::.. r::,.l•ti:..l,,;,:, :� S4rr; .:• d•--�� r•.•• park is a major link in a long chain of parks ' ■' '=-r"''�_:''` "�;'; " :-`_':?�•'�•"r = !1'"°r' Regional Park is a centerpiece r:,H--"� :;Nil. •• •• 7 r:' R. !"•Y: tpr Glendale Re �! g p and open space which are all connected by �x"; •�•';E•:t ,:• f:�+ :.S ; ;� ; .::a# ■■•.•. +i11 A. along the Jordan River,a culmination of ' I w.. Try— the Jordan River Parkway.This network of : -� ;I•_..:f t•�;••. ..:..;,Z. ■ seven major tri butaries f I owi ng out of + W.� =•�� :••' a•••s^:a public spaces positions the park to become �' ` the Wasatch Mountain Range to the east ♦ : ;; pe s••:t ..;;, .� h;; ..,...., the centerpiece of an oasis of trees in an + 1 and the final conduit in the Jordan River La n r •: :y ' ••-' •i G•a•'• =:1} arid urban environment,absorbing carbon, °�,'�!• , '• � ;,,.�„,H �. ':•I i Watershed.The Jordan River is the city's _ a r w R i mitigating Salt Lake City's challenging air + : r,' I.;�?i i r:•q».- ;;F,, largest river and flows south to north, I ;;' " v'4�n, . , ,.At �-t!":11■ pollution,and reducing urban heat island ■' ti •ty , ,�I •e�'::'� I ,,,,n.: r 1�•,+,,,, ,.� ;�, for 51 miles beginning at Utah Lake and effect.When ark improvements and �1 s. •'�'•. ,y '`" i !''°""''`•' •='�• •�yr•I' ;1 drainingInto the Great Salt Lake.The river's p p ■ ' ��� �. `s f� �fr'r?( r• ,';;, t e ? fir..;,::: features are complete,the park will be a r .- {°' ' .;�Z �:r.c! . 3 ;. =•v::s^ ` riparian habitat is a rarity in the high desert . G• ` • ;; !'"' ar„ !� ;? '" .� ■ p y g major recreational node in the city's park s: EE\ �. ' •` •.! !• • + environment of the Salt Lake valley and `,1 �S•^''' �'t '' •••• •i .,,„ '�i;.:.ri system. y .H�'�.a w A. supports a variety of wildlife as well as many ;�,. ,• '"n.�' • "»'^".", ;`" #r'' • ■:'" WL migratory birds along the Pacific Flyway. ai �;•% ■ �e••T •••' •++^+ • �+ra^ Neighborhood • d +:. •. °�,�f'�.; ,• .:,, :',=Y -_ �p�ti. Milli 14 Clty-Regional Glendale Regional Park will immediately 1� �_ Wit- ��Y�, tis i L'. CENTER" ' r�t9; I; Jordan serve the Glendale neighborhood.Park ■ i' .:.r; '• g�„„;.,• R� The park is a part of Salt Lake City's ``.•�., y ,y c .f:: RlVer enhancements will create direct and r:4 Westside neighborhoods.Despite .t5 x:,fr1 ,• .';s i �a e:,. Tra!I f ■. g significant access to the nature that 1 •, proximity to the natural spaces along the • 1•ti�!•y�."• ::yl�� S.W...II:J:E exists directly in the neighborhood's '• a�� Jordan River,these neighborhoods are backyard,providing opportunities for free 2 -- "•,``;:•„�s;'4T; !:�< �':I i sandwiched between the congested I-15 , - ' '" '�:•...;,C••:rs 'r9 7 :� ■"�u�� j■ recreational activities that are nearby I - ..... . ::,..1:1•• corridor and the city's industrial districts. , — s and accessible to all.The park presents According to the 2014 Westside Master Plan,"compared to other communities an opportunity to strengthen connections between the adjacent 1700 South Park to ■ -= ` , j' within the city(excepting the industrial g 1 �' �" The the north,Glendale Nei Neighborhood Park _ districts west of I-215),the Westside carries to the west,and Jordan River Parkway ,`WARCOB.0111RISE , an inequitable share of land dedicated to Futureto the east.The addition of an enhanced Regional manufacturing uses:'As measured by crosswalk across 1700 South,bridge � Parkthe EPNs environmental justice indexes, connections to the parkway and potential ■ 94 the neighborhoods surrounding Glendalefuture trail connections to the proposed '-ai�IkTE 7 Regional Park are disproportionately E * *1 -. Parley's Surplus Canal Trail will be key to providing �q , I. r■,1 NMi exposed to environmental hazards such enhanced park access for the Glendale 'l Trail as air pollution that settles in the valley and t e increases risk of health complications. /Im 1 !' !3 mooHowever,the park's proximity to the �1 -�•`-��-'"�!1. 1 M * , r .:..tc�-.'.:•.�..'.'...�i:.17 � =' Jordan River offers an opportunity to build iflIN EF upon existing natural assets,creating an *+ .■ �' ! +t •1 �:: 7 r ecological park of vegetation and green r -'_I -� �0' '0 �' ' �, infrastructure to mitigate local pollutants site Context&Analysis 8 Glendale Regional Park - Neighborhood Context to sees a a Nw. 01 0 1,1 ' 1a ..in '0 011111 1 mop:: s v 1•y ORENSON• END ,•.� It u .•. �, _ .. M M= �. r .. :• ;, `I SIN NI ., •.. ...r.�r :_ �: r; .: : - : � %:: Jordan CENTE �. %r .,? : ; .:• Riper � '`. �• Pi` , "` ;. ■ .,■ .• i i■ .■ Trail 1100.Y ` on- as .• .'I Cool 1111 rlr ■' '•• _tii■_ u Ile lob 'I - N I • f ,```btu The Arc� oiu tEi. Future ; �•■ �, — GO ' Park ■ I , .' �IfNlµµlq`0,� S '� ■ . ■ J. 1111kT'm , IA ■ ■ � �■ � � , ♦ � �► • ail f 9 1 Site Context&Analysis • N I • . . - -� TM 1700 S Park Awl lir— -� array��� -- ._ Glendale - - ' } Regional Park Site 4 Glendale 1. Nih e bo ood F - Park ,4 — '� Jordan River Trail .r Glendale r •' - F -` A ` ' �.: Golf Course ' 71 _ - ,r t r Views A City Set in Nature • LOOKOUTPEAK Salt Lake City is known for its spectacular mountain setting.Being surrounded by w nature is a point of pride that contributes ENSIGN PEAK STANSBURY to the City's quality of life. 1 ISLAND lie �. A hike to the top of the hill built to support r ' DOWNTOWN the former water park's slides offers +� y '? Northeast Views "�f�" views of the surrounding golf course, ` :_� West Views downtown SLC,the emerald ribbon of IN the Jordan River and the Wasatch and E - ± .�/:� GLENDALE • GRANDEURPEAK . Oquirrh Mountains beyond. REGIONAL ,:. PARK . . . GOBBLER'Sa ,. 46 i FARNSWORTH PEAK • • OLYMPUS NELSON • Southwest Views 01 : Southeast Views O'SULLIVAN PEAK EPEAK CLIPPER . LOWE PEAK • k— FLATTOPMOUNTAIN • 11 1 Site Context&Analysis Park Views Key Map ,;; FARNSWORTH PEAK STANSBURY ISLAND ENSIGN PEAK GRANDVIFW PEAK GRANDEUR PEAK NELSON PEAK KESTLER PEAK DOWNTOWN SLC LOOKOUT PEAK --ISMS. � West Views - Northeast Views ` LOWF PEAK NELSON PEAK GRANDEUR PEAK GOBBLER'S KNOB O'SULLIVAN PEAK FLAT TOP MIN. CLIPPER PEAK FARNSWORTH PEAK MT.OLYMPUS LONE PEAK .� 91� _- _ t •�.�� - --_ _ him _ 49• YJ Y = - �' �Y 'WOW Southwest Views Southeast Views �r. a _ Site Context&Analysis 12 Transportation - Regional Rail&Bus Connections - r 0 0 0 - There is a lack of regional public transit10 connectivity between Glendale Park and _ - other parts of the City.The closest rail connection to Glendale Regional Park is the River Trail Station along the Green ARR C��1 Line(2340 South 1070 West),which is a 1.3 mile walk away. j Nearby bus routes include the 9 and 217 1 — 1 sonsass, WE IAA '• which run every 15 minutes,and the 509 - - sons which runs every 30 minutes.The 513 has fir limited service and only runs during rush 7 - .. LORD a •�• hour.Yet,as shown on the following page, ' _ rt '1,. a these routes do not have stops that are __ ooi ~om within a comfortable walking distance of 'E r 1� Glendale Park. 1� ;f ,r( • i i RI RK Additional connections to Trax and bus IF h • , �' lines,as well as other modes of public transportation should be explored in order to enhance park access and_ _ sustainable transportation options. Increased public transit connectivity ; .: 1 6 i - - is also an important consideration forRIVER TRAIL facilitating park activities and events. . I +I "i ,x,;,, PUBLIC TRANSIT NEAR PARK STATION 1 t• _� '� 4� 15 Minute UTA Bus Routes _ •.ti - � 15 min.service ,, 30 Minute UTA Bus Routes 1 I � r Limited Service UTA Bus Routes I 15 Minute UTATRAX Line 4-� 11 , 4 r. t LEGEND „'Study Area UTA FrontRunner - Water Park 0 UTA TRAX Stations UTA Bus Routes Glendale Regional Park +� UTA TRAX Parks and Natural Lands • UTA FrontRunner Stations Public Golf Courses A 0 025 05 1 Miles 13 Site Context&Analysis o ° o ° e o 0 9 �0 Transportation - Neighborhood °° ° ° Q- - -0; •• °° ° ° Neighborhood Transit AccessOki -,J There is a gap in public transportation access for both • p ' 0°o 00 00 the Glendale neighborhood and Glendale Regional Park. iHE`oQ� .. 1 • AK • • In contrast to most other Westside parks which are �+ : •within walking distance of public transit,the majority ; 1 - , _ .� • • • • •• • •• - _ a•� t of the area is not within a 1/4 mile walk of a bus stop or R soo s �s • 1,_transit station. ;; -- ''' • K `. LIE The nearest bus stops are located 1/3 to 1/2 a mile away • • t -'� - from park entrances.A bus stop along the 509 sits near ,. r K ° 't the golf course entrance. _ `4p„�` ,�� socs ■ IND E It will be important to support enhanced public transit cogs _ AN connectivity between the park and surrounding 1 - '; re, "`I RK 'It neighborhoods.While the majority of the population R� • commutes by private vehicle,8.5%of households in the ° 1 Glendale neighborhood and up to 13.2%of households 0• ° • in the study area do not own a personal vehicle.This is • ° 0 significant,as only 3%of households in Salt Lake City do _ • _ a ° not own a personal vehicle' I ORE � I` MULTI-CULTURAL CENTER 1 • _ Y 1 LEGEND 1700' - • 1 • 1 United States Census Bureau,2020 American Community Survey UTA Bus Routes 6R PARK �1�1iiii����____ • • UTA Bus Stops • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1NOp ° • 1 mill— UTA FrontRunner Route 217 'A • UTA FrontRunner Stations 15 min.service • 1 -� UTA TRAX • 1/3 mile walk • UTA TRAX Stations Study Area Sale Lake City Boundary _ �j: - 1_• _ 1 _ t_i 1 __ - Quarter Mile Walk from TRAX Stations Adjacent t• ;: 1 Quarter Mile Walk from Bus Stops rnif( n, Existing Multipurpose Trail _ Entrance Pio�osed Mult purpose Ti ail 1 :� �L, lit� ion Water park �• ' _�-, ,•.� � Public Golf Courses 1 - • n u � 1 Parks and Natural Lands 1 I1 t 7 1 ', Glendale Regional Park • Il �— 1 t ' .... ��.�.. ..�.� ■a.ua�.�aaaa�aa.irl• ;*�•raraa��a , � I N - A 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles i=! R_ 1 1 Walkability - Site Analysis Pedestrian Connectivity 1700 South is comparable in width to I IL fir Redwood Road,yeti by 2108 counts, -V_ Fill *u is experienced only 35%of Redwood Road's _ r� traffic along a nearby stretch of the T' Redwood Road corridor.Near Glendale Regional Park,1700 South's traffic coun are very low for its width,indicating that the road width could be reduced to = �,- • F create safe and comfortable access for _ _ =_- ' _ _ - "'.�....,— •, ,.• pedestrians and cyclists. ,• • '' • ' There are currently only two crosswalks along 1700 South to connect the r neighborhood to Glendale Regional Park: C1 r' ' 1i one located near 1300 West,and one ='•;r i at the Jordan River Parkway Trail.The crossings are over 1/4 mile apart and the t distance between existing signals coupled with the wide street makes pedestrian crossing and access difficult. To create safer crossings and enhanced , connectivity between 1700 S Park and t Glendale Park,the Glendale Regional 1 Park Plan recommends an additional ` pedestrian crossing between the two existing crossings(see page 54). • `� Additionally,the Salt Lake City Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan identifies 1700 .: 2018:12,172 2018:34,566 South as an east-west pedestrian priority •• ' �✓.,�, � • 2017:12,000 2017:35,000 corridor,'and the City's Transportation ' Apr Division is currently evaluating the j - 2014:9,980 2014:27,600 t Source:2022Kalibrate Technologies(Q12022), potential for improvements here related ESIt1 Business Analyst to active transportation. LEGEND Water Park 1 SLC_PBMPCompleteDocument(Dec20l5)Clickable. pdf(slcdocs.com) ITfT1 A 0 50 100 200 Feet 15 1 Site Context&Analysis Tr n R r tion - __ I i _ _ .--. _ a •� -� it a s a d ec ea r............ ............1 • r1 Regional Recreation Connectivity �• Glendale Regional Park is the southern anchor along ! r' the SLC portion of the Jordan River Parkway.Trailhead D4 - access and parking is currently located at the 1700 S 1 ,_ rPAIK River park. Tr t, r' I✓ - s i•.. f ' ' - 1 Esw The proposed Surplus Canal Trail will be an important addition,providing a direct connection between the park and residents of western Glendale who currently _ rortA 1 `�; do not live within a 10 minute walk from a park. _ . .1 ►AIK ..'' 005 IK • �� —I •,' i ■• i' — 1300 i ' 01IN5 MULTI•CULTURA P • LEGEND 1,- If; y _ 1 r,, -,� I AI 17aBs Existing Multipurpose Trail 1 w'�' I + ! i -, , it 1 ... Proposed Multipurpose Trail i On-Road Bike Lanes GIIINDAIE ' Water Park GoLFCoU4sE - � is 1 , • _� � , Parks and Natural Lands Public Golf Courses Glendale Regional Park 1 - • .:`ep�, - ..w 0 Trailhead - 0 Trail Access — , Study Area ..1-- ,}'_ j __ _ . . Salt Lake City Boundary > ,_ `� i •• A 0 025 0.5 1 Miles _ , i 1• _ - c i �a, _ 116- � Fl I ' 1 y 1 sb�►>jER AcrrEu t I � _� _ Water-based Recreation - : The Jordan River Water r rJIM BOATER ACCESS=- i I er Mrmafo6•Trail .... ' osgtRampPill paddling. _ The Jordan River flows from South _ BOATER ACCESS•: I - Jordan :•, 1 - SNERWOOD 0�Alshsimerf Pork; to North,beginning at Utah Lake and g yPARK h side. emptying into the Great Salt Lake.The IL1•• _ adds boat ramp at Glendale Regional Park is a Boat Access Restrooms Parking sosoo's major access point along the Jordan River Water Trail.This section of river allows 1700 South- 1700 South River Limited at Ramp. ro. • - • - Exchange Club Park J paddlers access to 3.3 miles of beginner I' Marina(Glendale Additional 3- ►OPLA .• level flatwater floating(about 1-2 hours). Regional Park) Parking at 1700 °m : s ►AptFor a quicker trip,boaters can take out South River Park. - 1 a+6uNnAVE ! i.lfi4! eao- at the Modesto Park ramp,1.2 miles Modesto Park At Nearby Jordan Limited Parking w Bell 1. �i� : - s,, downstream.Paddlers who are willing Park 3• RK _;_.10# to brave a short section of intermediate Alzheimers Park No Limited Parking _ _ _ r. ` obstacles can continue on for another 3.8 w •� BOATER ACCESS- miles of beginner floating until reaching Fisher Mansion No On street • Mo'desto.Rdl 1 Parking - West side the Riverview takeout at 1800 N. �. i _ tTods u ` I ids' River access can be enhanced by creating N • sORENSCW easier entry for canoes and kayaks.The I I ';�' 1 MUtn-cuuugAk;" I 3' 1 0 water quality is an issue,so swimmingCD • ] ° I 1 j should be discouraged,but as the water irk 1 ;_ !I t RIVE DATER ACC @ -17.00 � quality may improve in the future,water • y' �� cou '. FAR itouth Exchda0e Cfub, ' 1 '�qos. Manna:vEe frs a?= A • ' access should not be completely cut off. .r- E Additional small boat access locationsFirst s to f 1 should be evaluated to create a more local . ' scale river recreation circulation pattern. �� - level' " ' ' The Jordan River also has potential for LEGEND — • - , ; — — ►- - — urban fishing.According to the Utah r Salt Lake City Boundary s s Department of Natural Resources,the — _ q _ f ; _ Boat Access 1 j - river"provides great opportunities for • 5 `) �' RECOMMENDLD fAKEi - L I ' catfish,bullhead,carp, bass and Study Area 1 • a 3 p • OUT Jo di n fth�r _ Parks and Natural Lands 1 T'` J r .I Rsdwo*Ttrif*kd' walleye"1However,according to the - Park westy ' report Fishes of the Jordan River,"recent 0 Public Golf Courses �t findings of various pollutants common to water Park highly urbanized areas like the Salt Lake Glendale Regional Park Valley suggest that it may not be safe to eat any fish from the river,especially in • Surplus Canal Dam Hazard downstream areas:'2 1 https://wildlife.utah.gov/news/utah-wildlife- ' `• news/743-4-utah-rivers-that-offer-great- SO SO ■ i fishing-in-august.html .25 0.5 1 Maas A 0 0 I , r 2 http://jordanrivercommission.com/wp-content/ - u ploads/2011/04/Fish-Species-of-the-Jordan- River-2011.pdf - 17 Site Context&Analysis "�3 M CG#SS ;Jp l 1 Ttltltt', sM�' tRiuerkan tell - Site Ecology Local and Regional Migratory Birds-Pacific Flyway Connections The Glendale Regional Park is in acentral asap Geese Head Duck OOTI Cranes eC9anser part of Salt Lake City but is also centrally QO �Jt located along the riparian corridor of the Jordan River,which provides a z key connection of riparian habitats for resident and migratory birds.The site is +•' located along the flyway between Utah Lake and Great Salt Lake and provides a potential stopover location for resting a ! a i migratory birds. � ",;-•�., �; , There is potential for increased areas :yam of higher quality riparian habitat along the Jordan River with the creation of an enhanced multi-canopy layer structure. Robust riparian habitats consist of canopies that could have several layers Existing Site Trees of complexity including large trees,small trees and shrubs,grasses,and forbs [flowers].This multi-layer structure t�Ore `tO olive ev�Ocusf is beneficial for creating a diverse p� �a ecosystem that will be more resilient to 5 Q' �' m� «Z future changes in climate and ecosystem processes.Surrounding regional areas that are owned by SLC adjacent to theMai 11 golf course and in other open areas offer great opportunity to be enhanced for riparian functioning and flood capacity. ; V ,; See Appendix B for a full site ecological assessment. NEW- - Site Context&Analysis 18 Climate Considerations Weather Averages Average High=July 90 degrees Average Low=January 26 degrees Salt Lake City is comfortable % of the year.... ....]%too hot and 64%too cold. 88 days per year with precipitation 3059 hours of sunshine I 36.62 8.57 inches precipitation ` I I 2" 47 inches annual snowfall' I I 121.41 13.80 Additional Site ( +� I 620 Considerations 141 9.01 i I North to South moderate winds 6AM -16.62 Overall weather patterns moving I I, 2422 in from West to East' ` I I 1 ! 3183 Little shade/tree cover " I �I ■li I-39.43 • Shade/ice in winter due to aspect ran Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Cooler temps by Jordan River UnNersal thermal Climate Index(C) 1/11012/31 be*een 0 and 23 @1 cily:saBtakealy country.USA Drought Conditions source:M--24127 Glendale Park lies within a high desert environment,receiving only 12AM 8.5 inches of water each year.Water is becoming increasingly scarce, I 1 with Utah's Governor declaring a State of Emergency due to extreme bPM drought.Recommendations from 1 I I I I Utah's Department of Natural I Resources to reduce water usage 12PM 1 include implementing water-wise 1 landscaping,a practice that should be applied at Glendale Regional Park to 6AM I condition the greatest extent possible.' 'Comfortable III I 1 https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/salt- 12AM I I I I Uncomfortable lake-city/utah/u nited-states/usut0225 ran Feb Mar Apr May ]Lin Jul Aug Sep al Nov Dec 2 https://nhmu.utah.edu/sites/ Thermal Comfon(condilion) default/files/attachments/ 1/1rohake 12/31be*een0and23@1 al SaltLakeValleyWeatherPatterns.pdf aryaa cIXlnrry:USA y 3 https://water.utah.gov/water-data/drought/ source.MY--24127 drought-declaration/u:-:text=on%20 Apri I%2021%2C%202022%2C%20 Spencer,to%20state%20or%20federal%20 resources. 19 1 Site Context&Analysis Site Impervious Surfaces 74 ti •` IIIIIIIIII�I I ' _F. .ram �w� -� 1 .�-�-- rr. Site Surfaces Asphalt-24% Concrete:24% '- Pool Features:6% h *4W Total Impervious Surfaces:54% Pervious Landscape:469/6 Impervious surfaces such as roads,pavement,and buildings are often increased during development.These surfaces contribute to higher runoff,polluting waterways and depleting groundwater.The site has a high level of impervious surfaces,with WA 54%of the site being covered in asphalt and concrete.The redevelopment of Water Park the park provides an opportunity to reduce these surfaces through low impact development practices,utilizing green infrastructure to absorb stormwater on site Pervious Landsape 333,167 SF and create ecological benefits.The future park design will reduce the current amount Asphalt 176,472 SF of impervious surfaces by 50%.See page 56 for the final park plan's site surface Concrete 176350 SF percentages. Pool Features 46,053 SF A 0 50 100 200 reel Floodplain - Site Scale "MMI M- 1 Floodplain preservation directly enhances 4"" _ 1 1 the local environment.According to < - FEMA,floodplain benefits include: - Fish and wildlife habitat protection oezv 'r Natural flood and erosion control Surface water quality maintenance Groundwater recharge `6 �• °�z° y' - r'� ,,, Biological productivity Higher quality recreational �= opportunities(fishing,bird watching, ' boating,etc.)' To protect critical riparian habitat within the floodplain,Salt Lake City ( w '; ( •.1. � has implemented a Riparian Corridor Overlay District(RCO)which regulates development within 100 feet of a natural ! ` °Eza _ {' - r '• -' �azsc waterway'sAnnual High Water Line.All l improvements within 1OO'of the annual d it 0Ez4 �1 ,� high water line of the Jordan River will \ 4z30.� .l .� � OEzy - _...� —, follow guidelines outlined in the RCO. `• oeZ `� �— ' - , Development near the river corridor will seek to enhance floodplain functions through riparian restoration.Structures, such as boat ramps or docks,will be built in accordance with RCO zoning ordinances? 4230 LEGEND A 0 50 100 200 Feet — — 2 foot Contours 1 https://www.fema.gov/floodplain-management/ r�Water Park wild life-con se rvation/benefits-natural 2 http://www.sledocs.com/building/b-riparian- ®100 year Floodplain corridor.pdf i Building Footprints *Buildingsonsile have been demolished 21 1 Site Context&Analysis Floodplain - Regional Scale r. �.ai.i.•.��. ��f��RTYiI�'si�k� _ `IrV� -iu 1 •• .� • Resilient Communities i' - ' �•'.• _.1;, i,•, • SHERWOOD FEMA Floodmaps highlight areas that are more likely to i i=. isARK y ' { experience flooding.The 100 year flood plain shows areas •r _ 5 ' / t' r�- that are likely to flood at least one out of every 100 years C I snot . too (a 1%or higher chance of flooding)while the 500 year —� . r ➢' t -.' floodplain shows areas likely to flood at least once every - 500 years. t _ ►o► E : • ►OBE IIMS ! N Floodplain maps help to create resilient communities by n - •. ■ 'INMAEAAYE highlighting which areas are higher and safer ground Roos for structures.Restoration of the floodplain along the 7 Jordan River at Glendale Regional park will remove a few - storage and office buildings from the 100 year flood plain, which will mitigate costs that would have been associated if current structures were damaged.It will also prevent _ impairments to water quality that would be caused by a compromised structure in the event of a flood.Floodplain — _ " I r SOR!"s°r cuM com p p r- 1 - CENTER . restoration including planting along the river's edge will 0 1 _� _il•,,� . - V� �. '' , also slow stormwater runoff,reducing water pollutants trapped in runoff from flowing into the Jordan River, reducing erosion and improving groundwater retention 19 s -' eOAIE.-- lmo5 r' IZ on the site. _. - - • I-,�� _ •c it (6oLFCGURE$ LEGEND � i ;..— I •�.� �1 _— _ � 11 �`I _ - �rr, J i I ' !f RiparianAreas t 100 year Floodplain (_' • u 500 year Floodplain Parks and Natural Lands Public Golf Courses t Stud Area r � Salt Lake City Boundary t Water Park : . Glendale Regional Park i S / r A 0 0.25 0.5 proles Community Demographics Population Growth Population and Projected Population Growth Percent of Primary Market Under 19 Years Old The planning team analyzed demographics traits of likely park users.This assessment Primary Market Population was broken down into a local assessment,called the primary market area,shown on page Secondary Market/SLC Population 24,and a city-wide assessment,called the secondary market area.See Appendix D for the 222,029 21.77%in SLC full demographic and market study. 204,380- Over the next five years(2021-2026)population in the primary market area is expected to +8.65% 27.85%in County grow by 3.54 percent,reaching a total population of 30,571 in 2026.The population in the 186,399 +9.fi5% 63.48% secondary market area is expected to see slightly higher growth over the next five years, over 19 years old 36.52% growing by 8.65 percent to reach a total population of 222,029 in 2026. under 19years old Level of service measures the amount of parkland available to the community and is often measured by park acreage per population.As the population grows,Glendale Regional Park will be an important addition to the City's park system,ensuring that the current 28,369 29,525 30,571 30,571 level of service is maintained and that the community has adequate access to outdoor +4.�7% +3.54% recreation and open space. Age 2010 2021 2026 The high ratio of children in the primary market area indicates a high concentration of families in the region.The largest age cohort in the secondary market area is between 20 and 29,indicating that there is an overall younger demographic in this region that may Age Group Demographics of Primary Market enter family formation years(30-39)within the next decade. 19.78% While park features and activities seek to accommodate all ages,Glendale Regional Park 20 Primary Market Ages will feature a variety of activities that are targeted to families and young people such as an all-ages playground,a swimming pool,a water play feature and a skating ribbon. Secondary Market/SLC Ages --- ------ Salt Lake County Ages 15 c 0 ------- 0 10 w 0 0 ■ 0 0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 Age Group 23 I Site Context&Analysis Community Demographics Household Income and Wealth Primary Market Study Area ESRI Wealth Index Score •��, ,-ram 105 The 2021 median household income in the primary market area is$50,508,which is less : 1 100 County than that of the secondary market area($63,364)and that of Salt Lake County($80,897). i - 85+ SLC/Secondary Market The primary market area is also expected to see less growth in median household income ;�y L*E Ply 50 (12.18 percent)than in the secondary market area(19.14 percent)and Salt Lake County - 4 , t s�i� 47 (13.59 percent)between 2021 and 2026. + PrimaryMarket+ 25 The Wealth Index is a metric used to compare overall wealth of communities to the ' ' : �.. Score of 100-National Average national level.The index compares the wealth calculated for selected areas to the average 4P national wealth levels.Wealth indexes above 100 indicate wealth levels above the national average.The wealth index in the primary market area is 47,indicating that the area has ]; ;{� - —•.ti lower amounts of wealth when compared to the national average. Income distributions for both median and disposable income levels are skewed towards lower income levels in the primary market area while those in the secondary market area and Salt Lake County form a more normal distribution around the median income level.This,in addition to a lower primary market Wealth Index,indicates that income levels are lower in the primary market area than the secondary market area or theTli _'S county.Given this distinction,the park will best serve the primary market through low or no cost activities for both adults and children.There is a need for the implementation of PrimaryMarket programming such as free fitness classes or facilities that can supplement recreational Median Household Income of Primary Market demands of the community for little to no cost.If concessions are implemented,then they should be priced appropriately. 20 L_ _j Primary Market Median Income Secondary Market/SLC Median Income ------ Salt Lake County Median Income 15 Low&No-Cost Activities c� The . 0 10 ------- the primary market a through low or no cost 0 activities for both adults ° children.and 5 0 <15,000 15,000- 25,000- 35,000- 50,000- 75,000- 100,000- 150,000- 200,000+ 24,999 34,999 49,999 74,999 99,999 149,999 199,999 Median Income ($) Community Engagement • Engagement Overview A top goal for SLC Public Lands was to create a park that is a community park first,and a regional destination as well.The planning team wanted to be sure they received robust input on community needs and desires from members of the local neighborhood and also gather insights on park needs from the larger pool of city-wide residents.A series of engagement activities were conducted from October 2021 to May 2022 including: — - » Neighborhood and Stakeholder Engagement: Glendale Neighborhood Events:3 events,110 participants _ Youth Engagement:Glendale Middle School and Mountain View Elementary School, 128 participants Community Advisory Committee Meetings:3 meetings including 14 participating members Citywide Engagement: "Plan Your Park"Open House:100 attendees Public Online Survey:1361 participants "Plan Sharing"Glendale Community Council:15 participants •Z Engagement for the park site began prior to this project's planning process.Previous public engagement included a City survey and a visioning process led by the Glendale _ Community Council in 2020-2021,which generated initial ideas about possible amenities I and programming options to consider for the site.These ideas were used as a starting point for the engagement activities described in the following pages. •` r - Glendale Neighborhood Events d?. The Glendale Regional Park engagement team participated in three community events in A top goal was to create a park that is early October 2021.The goals for these engagements were to: 1. Share the public feedback being incorporated by the project team to date; community-led and reflects Glendale's2. Engage the community in adding ideas for amenities and programming not already shown; 3. Engage the community in thinking about the site in relation to existing adjacent open culture and history, offering spacesspace;and for social connections,features, and 4. Envision ideas about how existing site features could be repurposed. activities that interest the WestsideT Participants were invited to share where they go to recreate,in or outside the neighborhood and to consider how the old water park site could interface with the larger open space network around it. 27 1 Community Engagement Engagement L Activities / fi5,1: Key Takeaways Include lots of amenities Glendale Across all three engagements,people felt Neighborhood Events Need for a neighborhood park-like that adding any public amenity would be experience better than what exists currently.While 3 Events, Participants 110 most identified preferences from the - October 2021 Most participants acknowledged that boards,and added a few,most suggested there were not a lot of amenities in the that any or all of the amenities would be a immediate area and that they were benefit. leaving the neighborhood to recreate with Youth Engagement families.Some said they use the Jordan River Trail,playground(s)at neighboring Free and affordable 128 Students schools and the soccer fields at 1700 S Park. z Cost is important.Some participants December 2021 Predominantly,people use other existing were surprised to learn that there would II SLC Parks,including the International be no entrance fee to use the site.Others Peace Gardens,Jordan Park and Liberty 1 suggested that boat/equipment rental a Park for an outside"park experience"For and a cafe/concessions would need to be Public Online Survey play amenities like splash pads,playgrounds accessibly priced. and dog parks respondents noted they 1361 Participants would drive as far as Kearns,Sandy and ! /d' March-Apri12022 Preferred Amenities - Bountiful to use those amenities. Ir d a; !P` The amenities provided on the boards were Safety is a top priority very popular and are listed in priority order — jV Community from all three events. Advisory Committee Safety was a priority for most of the adults we spoke with.Many mentioned better Splash Pad/Water feature Meetings members street crossings,lighting at the site and Playground other improvements designed to make Public Art November 2021-June 2022 it an attractive place for people to spend Green Open Space/Trail time.This extended to recreation along Sports courts Plan Your Park Open the Jordan River and the cleanliness of the Community Gathering Space p water.Many people expressed interest in Skate/Bike park ` � House water activities,but not necessarily from Boat rental _ . 4 100 , • ants the Jordan River in its current state.Even Fishing(pond) + people who mentioned fishing thought a Performance Venue March 2022 separate pond would be more desirable than the river. •.••_ Glendale Community Council Community Members at the Plan Your Park Open House(top and bottom) and a Glendale Neighborhod Event(middle). 15 Participants June 2022 Community Engagement 1 28 Youth Engagement tC Student Engagement Students participated in a variety of engagement activities,including an asset mapping workshops with Saia Langi(City Library)and with Jarred Martinez who runs Truth Cypher, a storytelling/arts collective.Students also furthered their knowledge of city planning ` by participating in PlaceIt!Activities with Claudia Loayza who is a graduate student at l the University of Utah in City&Metropolitan Planning and the Community Engagement II �1 I Coordinator with the Utah Division of Multicultural Affairs.As part of PlaceIt!activities, students built environments from found objects that reflect their life-experiences.Students fi)f also participated in a soundscape exercise where they listened to park sounds from around the world.Then,they imagined themselves at the new park and wrote poems on leaves o which formed collages,displayed in the image to the left.These activities captured a lot of the sounds,sights,smells,tastes,feelings,thoughts and community experiences the ♦T i students would like to have at the new park. As one of the central engagement activities,students put collages together individually using images of parks.The individual collages were deconstructed and categorized into themes identified by the students.The deconstructed collages were then reorganized into a •.� � • .�:� collective collage.Character images of amenities and features to be used in the park were counted and helped to determine the types of amenities to include in the preferred plan. Students gathered data about what values should be most present in the park.As a result, 38%of the students prioritized safety,23%said creating a welcoming feeling at the park was most important,and 9%felt like fun was their top value.Other top values mentioned include good vibes,home,loving and open.These values were numerically represented in the collage tree with orange leaves representing safety,purple symbolizing welcoming, c yellow symbolizing fun,pink being good vibes,green being home and blue being loving and u i t•�r open. • �� Key Takeaways I The collective collage represents the importance of inclusion,unity,diversity and creativity ,yv y when thinking of park design.We hope the design of the park fosters these values.Black and white photos mixed with color ask us to consider the importance of history(both of the space and the people with roots in the neighborhood)while looking forward with fresh ✓� p ) ' _ _ _ /p ideas for the future.Creativity in addressing the desires/needs of a wide variety of ages, abilities,interests,species is also represented by the multi-layered project.Put into the shape of a tree,the collage asks us to consider the natural assets that are present such 4 �{ as the Jordan River,birds,insects,mammals and existing trees.Nature is emphasized • _ _ throughout with flowers and stenciled images of butterflies and aquatic animals, ' Y . highlighting students'desires to have water and pollinator friendly spaces be major parts of the park.The tree design also communicates the desire for staying true to the roots of 29 i Community Engagement Youth Engagement 1,10RES QQP f - O . - ourneighborhoodwhilebeingwillingto Water-112 images:Students were �� 38% „!•� grow into new forms in the future.This strong in their opinion that some water > of students rated also suggests that priority for input for the elements need to be maintained at the safety r new design should be given to those who park while also increasing access to water as the have established roots in the neighborhood activities on the Jordan River.They prefer , and have helped/are helping to build it. number 1 value to have a pool and made the argument Stenciled flowers are of a tropical variety, p that a pool is much more inclusive and suggesting that honoring the knowledge, accessible to a wider variety of abilities and �( Need experiences and cultures who come from ages than a splashpad.They contend that lighting and around the globe is important as well.The splashpads will only be used by young kids better street multi-layered approach of the process also while a pool will be used by their younger crossings asks planners to take their time to listen to siblings,themselves,their parents and a variety of voices.The unique handcrafted grandparents.They would like to have at 3D structures underline some of the least a couple slides in the pool. rNature Pl1lllllllli , elements that students find most importanti to have in the park design.The sculpture of 230� ' the pair of glasses requests the audience Nature-74 images:Students would like .1 ! to observe deeply and take unconventional the landscaping to provide shade,picnic p Y said having the perspectives into account with the planning space and natural play areas.They would ark feel process. also prefer a pollinator friendly design to p r attract butterflies(especially monarchs), welcoming Students tallied the numbers of collage bees and birds.Spaces for animals was their number 1 1 images that represent the themes they (domestic and wild)are important to foster. VdIUe identified to be included in the park. They also find it important to have trees that Sports/games-112 images:Emphasis provide food for humans. was on variety in order to offer something of interest to everyone.Students also Adventure-66 images:Student ideas for adventure included bike and skate parks, _ •Al highlighted the desire to have activities available in each season with perhaps ropes courses,zip lines,and a trampoline k. a space that could be converted to ice par Pollinator& skating rink in the winter while functioning Outdoor � '-• " as something else in warmer months. Gathering(seating,picnic,etc.)-49 Students found it important to have images:Students had a lot of ideas about activities available at all times of day so food trucks being a regular presence at the 9% L_ 0 lighting at night is important to them. Bike park.They mentioned that food will bring i park,basketball courts,skate park,petting more people to the park and a food truck ' zoo and dog park seem to be popular ideas. presence can highlight global foods that are Said fu n Boatia A running/walking loop around the park is representative of our neighborhood. was their top also valued. Value. Community Engagement 130 Community Open House Community Open House The Glendale Regional Park Master Plan Team held an in-person open house at the Glendale Community Learning Center.The purpose of the event was to share park concept plans, A which had been created through previous public input.The Glendale community was ilk �. invited to provide their feedback on different programming elements,amenities and style _ 4 ' Ictl 7 characteristics while learning more about the project.Concept plans shared at the meeting ` �er?(10E' 1 11 are shown on pages 37-38. Approximately 150 people participated in the open house,the majority of whom live and/ or work in the Glendale community.Attendees were able to move freely around the event space to talk with their neighbors,the project team,and view concepts plans for the site. Attendees were given stickers as they entered the room which allowed them to identify their preferences on activities,amenities and stylistic themes they would enjoy. Key Takeaways 1 � The concept plan with the most votes was the"The Glendale Green"a concept alternative that was filled with many park features facilitating active recreation and community 1 ' gathering.The most popular amenities included a water feature such as a pool,a hiking hill/overlook,river access with a kayak rental and boat launch,biking,skating,and skateboarding areas,and a food truck court. y f, Public Online Survey The public online survey was promoted city-wide and was available from March 16 to April 16.It was offered in both English and Spanish and widely advertised.Approximately 1361 F people responded to the survey. ' •^" • -:=�-, � Who We Heard From Most survey participants(1,102 out of 1,361 participants,or 81%)live or work near Glendale �• :_',,� 4 Regional Park.Responses from the Glendale neighborhood were much higher(30%of •,' �'' '' �•'ti:�S,_' participants)than any other neighborhood,indicating that we truly are hearing the voice •r �`' j _. a•' of the local community.The second-largest group of participants(4%of responses)came from the Northwest Salt Lake/Rose Park neighborhood,a community that was also in the r- primary market area. The largest percentage of responses were from participants between the ages of 31-40 (28%of participants).This was followed by a large number of responses from youth ages 18 and under(22%of participants).This likely reflects substantial participation Glendale ,d� i { i ', ,•' t• Middle School students,who had participated in previous engagement activities and •, ,• i' were encouraged to take the survey.The greatest percentage of feedback came from the :Y f. 1 ,• white,Latino and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander communities,which aligns with the demographic makeup of the Glendale neighborhood. Public Survey Feedback ° 30% Who We Heard From of survey respondents hveinthe Q 7-How close do you live or work to Glendale Glendale Park? Neig84104) d 84117 8411984010 (84104) 91- 12384105 84081 10Ve nearby 8410284116 84109 84120 , �■■ 3411184104 0000084103 Neither _ 81% 84095 of 8410634115 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 9-00 1000 survey respondents841248410184108 live 84401 84096 84112 ,, ;;;:i 1��� 84093 Q26-What is your or mil ' ?_, 84043 y y work nearby �� B.acA c:Afncac Amedcan Ameman Indan or I Q 23-What is your age? Alaska Nawe Asian , Ycunger;non 13 � 267 Majority of Feedback Hhparr or Latin - IE-21 '79 (of anrr«e) from white,Hispanic/ _ Latino&Pacific Islander 22.30 200 Nettie HeweYen or t>�ten _ '' communities , 31AO 330 YAM 1 Lots of Youth 41•50 179 Ply ra to my Feedback J 30%=18 and younger. s16o -76 Omer 3: Glendale Middle School 61 or alder _64 i ,oo 00 oo participation! 0 1 � 0 s0 100 14 200 30C 3�� Community Engagement 32 Public Survey Feedback Online Survev Results Key Takeaways Q1-How Satisfied are you with the Overall Support for the Park also less interest in natural water features over bright and active elements,with only draft project mission statement? or Very Satisfied Overall,there was support for the park 17%choosing water play with sand and Missionwith Park Mission statement(68%of participants moveable features,and a natural water _ Statement were satisfied and 25%were very satisfied). feature being lower on the list of preferred Survey participants were also happy with park elements. sanst.ea ■ the project goals(64%were satisfied and 30%were very satisfied). Adaptive and Inclusive Play SMMiM 925 Top themes and preferred features from Inclusive Playgrounds accessible to all survey participants reflected the desire for skill levels and abilities were important to a park space that offers a large variety of survey respondents,with an"adaptive and options for active and passive recreation inclusive playground"being the number two veysdww 338 and places to host community gathering choice for playgrounds.Playgrounds at the and local events. park should incorporate accessible design 0 30o mo 300 W W J0o eoo W in with assistive technologies. Bright and Playful While many participants expressed Gathering&Local Events disappointment that the water park could not be revived,there was a desire to include There was a strong desire to create places park features and thematic styles that that would provide opportunities for are reminiscent of the former water park. community gathering,events,and local Bright,colorful and playful park features performances.Amenities such as food 03-How satisfied are you with these with were consistently top choices.Water trucks or concessions were also deemed Satisfied elements such as n outdoor pool and a an important component to draw the draft goals? fountain were deemed community in and activate the park.It was Project Goalswater-play plaza a a _ essential to include in the park design. important to the local community that the scale of events be appropriate for the A"colorful and industrial playground"was neighborhood.Most survey respondents the number two playground choice,behind wanted event sizes to host between 500- - the number one choice"play for all ages" 5,000 people and did not want to host (which also has playful imagery)and the larger-scale events such as regional most popular water feature was a colorful, concerts. _ artful fountain.There was less interest in nature play or playgrounds with a natural vnys.mr•a theme,with less than 12%of respondents choosing either of these features.There is � — r 0 300 200 300 40 500 600 700 800 900 101(( 33 Community Engagement 1 :4:4111111 Gathering&Local All-Ages Activities o Jed choice Bright&Playful Events All ages activities were very o°'` Respondents were Places for gathering, popular and were some of '4 drawn to bright, food &local events the most-selected items. � colorful features were top choices. orts choice reminiscent of local • • e�`,VgChoice e�s�SP e �� cultures and the colorful water park. lot M & >... All-ages Play tyre Choice - • •�.� �- lea (For adults tool) e� 3a orts Choic Multi-use Plaza for Food Sports Court Trucks,Concessions z &Festivals Artful Interactive ye choice Fountain All-ages Bouldering Jed Choice ' &Climbing At0 J0d Cho►c Inclusive Inclusive Playgrounds accessible to all ,_iJGli•• Ii 1,000-5,000 Person Event skill levels and abilities ; l were important to Colorful/ Adaptive/ ;— _ - / (Like Friendly Island i Tongan Festival) Inclusive survey respondents. Industrial Playgroun Playground High Interest Features *Top Choice in Both Public Online Survey and Engagement Events Hiking&Biking Trails* Swimming/Outdoor Pool Food Truck Court Ice&Roller Skating Ribbon Hiking&Hilltop Overlook 4 'ty� l^ F Y Flex Lawn,Community Event Community Plaza with Concessions* Water Play Feature&Plaza* Riverside Features Skateboarding Features* &Performance Space A. g T� Ni`'lei it Multi-Use Sports( Sledding Hill* Community Pavilion* Enhanced Boat Dock/Kayak Rental* Dog Park 9 / 1 35 Community Engagement Park Feature Feedbar... _ \ • Hiking/Biking Trails& Top Features Overlook n Hiking&biking trails with a hill- top overlook,swimming and an Multi-use Sports Court �� outdoor pool were consistently top choices of survey respondents. Sledding Skateboarding features,sledding, Food Truck Court riverside features(boardwalk, E3 enhanced boat dock,kayak rental) o[�' Ice&Roller Skating Ribbon / and a community plaza with a Skateboarding Features OC Ri;' h� concessions or food trucks were popular as well.Another top feature �' Community Plaza with ♦ '! ' Concessions was a multi-use sports court and a water play feature. Riverside Boardwalk Water Play Feature&Plaza DIV t,r Middle-ground and mixed Community Pavilion w/Grills or w�t•"f ��t 1�.�P � feedback features Warming Kitchen / p•.� Climbing features had mixed Enhanced Boat Dock feedback.Images of children's T climbing features and interest in Flex Lawn,Community Event& W�;; i rock climbing were lower on the list Performance Space ' of selected choices,however the all- Riverside Beach , ages bouldering feature received a very high number of selections Kayak Rental Station (728). a• Dog Park Kid's drawings of desired park features from the Plan Your Park Open House Ice and roller skating features also Playgrounds had mixed feedback.A skating =�•-�� Bouldering Features �w-�• .• ribbon was the number two choice �s�: •^ out of 10 in Concept A but the •seventh choice out of 12 in Concept Naturalistic Water Feature� � P B.Both ice and roller skating were Nature Play Playground --w r rated in the center of activity f " o Meadow"Lawn &Natural ' AIM interests on a scale of one to seven. i4:- i a PlantingR �M a" Low-Interest Features r-1 ' Community Garden • Fitness Features / Least-selected park features included a community garden, Bird Hides/River Overlook { � bird hides,a fitness station anda - communityclubhouse. d' Volleyball I � I_ 1 Community Clubhouse Community members voted for their preferred park features using stickers and comments at the Plan Your Park Open House Community Engagement 1 36 The Great Outdoors Park Concept A Nature in your backyard r ' till Park Features Building on the natural assets r . 1, v 0 Parking Lot of the Jordan River,this option celebrates nature through r i` restoration,education and play re,!41 1700oulhPark ©community Gardens it while bringing the adventure ; of the great outdoors to the ,�." ©Entry Gateway neighborhoods backyard. 0 Nature Play p�✓ i �* _ — ©Skating Ribbon ri �` J ��• 0 Walking/Biking Tower&Trails '' 0 ShadePergola 0 Picnic&Seating Lawn icy r: 0 Kayak Rental and Boat Launch p 0 m 1Q 1 (D�I "Meadow"Lawn and Natural Planting Naturalistic Water Feature Riverside Boardwalk st + ®Water Play Feature q Bridge 37 I Chapter Two The Glendale Green Park Concept B *Concept with the highest amount of popular features in both public online survey and engagement events Community connections ! �i'�� J ' Park Features The hub of the community, , this ;i, � ' (. Q Parking option creates gathering spaces -. to connect with neighbors �and generates vibrant play, Food Truck Court - r � Q exploration and activity for adults -j andkidsalike. �l - i wn" X� - © Entry/Main Pavilion y` _ - �A -4 fl f -�; "ar • _t' 0 Playgrounds .I I �` _ Q Adventure Playgrounds ■ 0 Fitness Features Q Skating Ribbon h:♦ e © fit. 6 04 0 Climbing Features 0 Picnic Pavilion and Plaza /. Overlook&Sledding Hill, ®.� ..F Hiking&Biking Paths �� • � Skate Area ® Flex Lawn&Small Performance ' Stage ''1 ® Outdoor Pool • �1 o Dock _ --• Dili" T �' ..r _ i ® Riverside Beach . r d1 � rr � ��:n •!t r Dog Park Bridge Chapter Two 138 The Vision A Community Regional Park Design Strategy - Keeping the memory of the water park alive,the park design is bright,colorful and active.It celebrates community gathering and active recreation with an array of park features that generate vibrant play,exploration and activity for adults and kids alike.Bright playground, plaza spaces and pavilions feature art,lighting and styles both reminiscent of the former _ * ♦ * water park and reflecting the cultures of the local community. _— - The park is active and community-driven.The many park plazas,picnic areas,pavilions and event lawns offer opportunities for local performances and festivals,family gatherings and community classes.The park is a hub for sharing local food,art and culture with family, friends and neighbors. Glendale Regional Park is first a neighborhood park,creating spaces for community gatherings and daily park experiences.A water play feature and outdoor pool create spaces for splashing,swimming and cooling off in the summer heat.Daily trips to the park can ° bring a game of basketball,family time at the all-ages and abilities playground,or activities • •s•M•. - with furry friends at the dog park.The park also offers new regional attractions unique to - the City's park system such as a skating ribbon,kayak rental,riverside beach and an event lawn and plaza for local festivals. The park is a place to explore nature through hillside trails and along the restored riparian landscapes of the Jordan River.A circuit of multi-use trails lead to hilltop views of the city or - -- - = to shaded riverside seating.A kayak rental station and enhanced access to the Jordan River creates a gateway to paddling adventures. �. Restoration and planting improves the local environment,creating an urban oasis that shades the park with newly planted trees,restores riverside habitat,and blankets the park _ with a garden of native and climate resilient plants. The park design strengthens regional connectivity,connecting Glendale Park to the larger park system with a proposed bridge connection to the Jordan River Parkway Trail,a recommended pedestrian crossing to 1700 South Park and a recommended multi-use trail connection to the future Surplus Canal Trail. 41 The Vision Glendale Regional Park Master Plan y Park Features ,r, j ilg, O Trail Connection © Picnic Lawn i© All Ages&Abilities Playground Pavilion/Shade Structure 74 rfa, ".?i' �l'- r 'i - ,,,- © Full-Court Basketball AF 0 Ice&Roller Skating Ribbon R '� `,I I ,• _-_ 0 Kid's Climbing Feature J a� r• a. Q All Ages Climbing Feature 0 Pavilion (D Community Plaza/Promendade m Parking Lot ` . • ' ® Hiking&Sledding Hill ® ADA Accessible,Multi-Use Trail 26 28 HilltopOverlook 27 i® Skateboarding Area 18 t Water Feature/Plaza Qr a o' Outdoor Pool 0 Flex Lawn&Performance Space <' Flex Stage/Plaza 24 � Bridge Connection to Jordan River� 23 Parkway 21 Dog Park Picnic Areas ® Riparian Restoration 20 "`' -- ----- - _ - Riverside Boardwalk Riverside Beach&Sand Volleyball Kayak Rental Station *: y ® Boat Dock ;;I .. Boat Ramp Boat Drop-off • w Pickleball Courts The Vision 42 c rye, At Trail Connectio 2 Picnic Law 3 All Ages Playground 4 ShadeStructur 5 Full-Court Basketball 6 Ice and Roller Skating 714. Asa +11♦ :fit - + T7�i`Wfr9A 1 t � "t'` 7 Kid's Climbing Featur 8 Adult Climbing Featur 9 Pavilion 10 Community Plaz 11 ParkingLo 12 Hiking&Sledding Hill r R iio -- W ,fir v It''i 13 ADA Accessible,Multi Use Trai 14 HilltopOverloo 15 Skate Boarding Area 16 Water Play Featur 17 Outdoor Pool 18 Flex Lawn&Performance Space YY , a 19 Flex Stage/Plaz 20 Bridge Connection 21 Dog Par 22 Picnic Are 23 Riparian Restoratio 24 BoardWal ' � fa•� r old' r �1 25 Riverside Beach&Sand Volleyball 26 Kayak Rental Statio 27 Boat Doc 28 Boat Ram 29 Boat Drop O * PickleballCourt Glendale Regional Park Vision-Playground for All Ages&Abilities ►ti _ Programming&Activation: Creating Memorable Community Experiences Programming and activation at Glendale Regional Park will seek to capitalize not only on the scale and amenity mix in the new park,but most importantly on the surrounding neighborhood's character and in-place assets.Glendale is a culturally rich neighborhood with a variety of stories j y 5`: to tell and experiences to share with each " r \ ,. "a-� xl other and with Salt Lake City as a whole. • -'�. ;. ;x �.� � - .-� While the park's design and landscape will define the"look;'outdoor programming �¢`'\ i • }. ;r, f will define how it feels.Public programming will differentiate it from parks throughout `ri�r �:' Salt Lake City by providing an environment where residents and visitors want to spend f time,and will use amenities and activities to create memorable experiences and t , i - ;1, ,�r•i +,� r. .:, emotional connections to Glendale. r � - /� i +r✓,i�• �� „ Today,Salt Lake City residents and visitors don't necessarily expect robust r _ ,,a �: � _ _ _— �,•,; — �=' ..:�_.. programming of public spaces.Many parks and plazas have failed to maintain a positive visitor experience because they - _ - have not programmed and managed their public realm to exceed local precedents. Visitors to Glendale Regional Park will have _ expectations for a safe and clean place that provides some sort of basic amenities.Our aim should be to exceed those expectations v > and surprise them with offerings they can't + - find anywhere else in Salt Lake City.There is an innate human desire for a feeling r of community,and programming should provide some of this,especially in a rich and diverse multicultural environment like ;kf Glendale. •. - The Vision 44 Phase 1 Programming Opportunities Children/family asing Strategies Pg x for f ALI ull Phase I description. Family fitness activities All-ability movement The diagram highlights possibilities for park programming,activities and events Music/literary education e ; Community partnerships along with City programming will be essential to • Organized playactivities activating the park. . Animal education events r .� River Programming Safety and awareness i Skillsworkshops Habitat education Volunteerevents Outdoor/environmental Nature/meditative walks r _r — Birding/wildlife workshops �r fio�,,, _ � a � Gardens/horticulture r-s •.i 9 � � . • �` �� Publican r^ Arts/culture/community WE �A; �• Audiencearea A'3'A t\.` r1. Outdoor movies Fenced/ Lawn games astoration Area Sports courts Clinics/lessons Estoiation Area / All-ability skills training Arts/culture/community Art cart ..'`�►�.-. ' r ,e -� Arts and crafts Small music/performance �. Literary events Glendale Golf Course r. Lectures _. Boardgames Temporary Hillsidey..' — Fitness/recreation/events Restoration Area t am Low impact fitness Organized recreation/workshops Protective 7 Fencing Phase I Rr 4 +' S Community cultural events Outdoor hobbyist activities 45 The Vision Future Phasing Opportunities for Programming Arts/culture/community The diagram highlights possibilities for park programming, Expanded arts programming activities and events.Community partnerships along with City Artisttalks and performance programming will be essential to activating the park. Artists in residence Concession Aquatic Programming Swimlessons Safety/CPR Parent/child program Senior fitness classes Skate park Lessons Demonstrations Skateboard repair 41 Deck art workshops River Programming Boating recreation Boatskills f Baitandtackle AIMj Concession River recreation 1 Swim lessons/safety Tubing r•�, Restoration/cleanup River education events v'v Dog Park Owner socials Training workshops Mobilegrooming Programming Will: Bark bar concession » Define how the park feels » Differentiate it from other parks and destinations-"the �j�. Performance/events competition" Concerts » Provide and active and appealing neighborhood anchor — Theater and dance » Provide a safe and clean place Community festivals » Capitalize on Glendale's rich and diverse multicultural Workshops(stage) environment » Capitalize on Salt Lake City's outdoors orientation i Fitness(Stage) ,d The Vision 46 Programming/Activation Park Activation for All Seasons and Times of Day Park Programming Calendar of Events Matrix Example Programming,such as depicted in the hypothetical matrices,is broadly categorized as: ARTS&CULTURE SPRING SUMMER FALL WINTER , . DAY , Arts&Culture,Fitness,Hobbies&Niche Interests,and Live Entertainment.Each category NIGHT PART provides a range of options that vary by time of day,seasons,intensity of activity,and,of Art supplies/art cart x X x X Both All Daily course,demographic cohort.We consider programming categories across the zones of Dance lessons x x Night Peak Weekly Glendale Regional Park,establishing a coherent pedestrian experience as one moves from Figure drawing classes x x Night Peak Weekly one area to another,while creating distinct environments throughout the park,coordinated Folkart/crafts x x X Day Off-Peak Weekly with the landscape architecture.The over arching goal is for Glendale Regional Park to feel Instrument petting zoo x x X Day Weekend Monthly busy and active and to give all user groups a multitude of reasons to visit at different times Local author readings X Day Peak Weekly through the year,a season,and even their day.While Glendale Regional Park can't be all Toddler art program x x X Day Off-Peak Monthly things to all people,it can certainly provide a range of experiences. HOBBIES INTERESTS Market Potential Study:Visitation Potential Board games cart x x X Daily Bookclub X X Monthly Bird-watching club X X X X Weekly Kayak/river education X X X Monthly rWeek1days rfteklends SpeClal Ever, activities People353 r People ,_ _ Cooking classes X X Monthly Salsa dancing X X Weekly Makers workshops X X X Monthly WELLNESS Weekday Visitation Potential Lunch Hour Biking club X X X Weekly 77 People Capoeira X Weekly Familyyoga X X X Weekly Mid-Morning Mid-Afternoon Walkingclub X X X X Weekly Lower Use Lower Use Hula hoop X Weekly Morning Afternoon Kickboxing X Weekly Zumba X Weekly Young adults without Young families with LIVE kids smallchildren ENTERTAINMENT Seniors and older Preteens and teens Acappella X X X Weekly adults without kids Brass bands X X Monthly Before Work After Work Dance performance X X X Monthly 138People 138People Emerging musician series X X Weekly Evening Outdoor movies X Weekly Young adults without Theater X X Monthly kids Silent disco X X Monthly The diagrams above display estimated park visitation collected from the planning team's market analysis. 47 The Vision Glendale Regional Park Vision-Hillside Sledding& The hill creates oppprtunitiis for seasonal sleddingand year-roundhiking 1 biking. ` 1 1 the hilltop overlook offersof the city, mountains and vibrant Salt 1.6ke suns'ets. `v r•-" V CA � 1 - �"( \ ♦, I Ar ' r .:). Y r_., _. - �. ). -r - '~ Tt+ � +sy� ^'L.• �J7 At o '+�z'b\ r 'S��� �.�f `Y' •♦ a � �� � t� Y f.X� r� �/a.j;V � - �W'.,'' - �— w ��ti, � ��,� 1 _ �• ,M_' � � l ..4'-a1� .... f'wr� � --T"''• ry -�•��i'�,y - 1 ter rlr �roi "Ay .i•,e'� t � � � 4,, � ���:� I } _ 1° '-� y� � �t II� c TheVision 48 Partnerships/Activation Partnerships:Diversity,Equity and Inclusion Opportunities Glendale Regional Park is poised to become the Westside's"central park;'with the goal of building a loyal base of regular visitors from all corners of the city.While Glendale Regional Park will be a public park that gets used by nearby residents for everyday recreation,it will Market&Festival Diagram ❑ 10 x 10 Market Tent also become a citywide amenity and driver of tourism and economic development. The diagram below shows a possible layout for The efforts to create a new Glendale Regional Park coincides with a national trend market and event tents along the community plaza. ❑ 20x2OMarketTent where downtowns and neighborhoods are seen as competing over a scarce pool of —, resources after the economic benefits from downtown development did not reach those Space for food trucks is stationed along the plaza L Food Truck Court neighborhoods in many cities;whereas the political consensus in the 1990s and 2000s was that strong downtowns helped create strong neighborhoods,today it is far more common edge. to hear elected officials emphasize their commitment to neighborhood-based community development and lament that too many public resources have been spent in central business districts. Given the sensitivities of the neighborhood relative to gentrification and public resources, the discussion around park equity must be refrained.The planning team has identified three planks of an overall program for Glendale Regional Park to help the City promote r. li equity and ensure the new park is inclusive of all residents:growing minority-owned businesses through concessions and contracts,supporting existing organizations that promote inclusivity and equity through programming partnerships,and partnering with local organizations through internships andjob training. 0 I&I Growing Minority-Owned Businesses Food&Beverage Entrepreneurship k Proposed future food and beverage opportunities are an opportunity to support budding entrepreneurs with limited access to capital.An entire program can be formulated with I P P P 9 • movable structures that come equipped with sinks,small refrigerators,and countertops, so concessionaires only need to purchase electrical appliances,signage,and whatever supplemental FF&E they desire(subject to City approval).This would make the concessions affordable opportunities for new food businesses.A park-or City-focused director k of hospitality,or community partner organization,would be qualified to guide these r ;y concessionaires with respect to menu design,kitchen operations,merchandising,signage, ': and the other aspects of running a successful food business that are usually learned ,. through a lot of experience.The City should provide,or work with a community partner to A provide,this service/consulting for free. J _ Glendale Regional Park(via the City)would need to establish an application process that would identify the entrepreneurs who would be likely to succeed in the park based on their proposals.Applicants would need to be new business owners.The applicant pool could also �• I u, �, include women-owned and immigrant-owned businesses. 49 The Vision • - •I I • • • to IVI •r'p � � • ��.o:r yc. ♦♦ • Oro. ♦ ♦ • • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ b ASl G _ � 3k dr• •- •fie. - � i 'J � — The community plaza is a brightly lit, C - vibrant promenade that hosts events' and festivals as well as food trucks, market booths and community-led activities. Concession Contracting programming at Glendale Regional Park to take on new full-time staff to help grow Occupational Training and that can eventually be sponsored.To their businesses or service offerings. Employment A mobile concession program(which is launch these programs,the park will need different than the food program above) to partner with cultural institutions,small The City can identify which organizations Glendale Regional Park can also work should also be addressed.While such businesses,and nonprofit service providers. are positioned to take advantage of the with a workforce development program a program would not involve the City The most desirable and reliable partners for possible benefits of a programming to provide work experience for program offering any financial assistance to these Glendale Regional Park will be established partnership.Many partners will enter into participants and employment for graduates concessionaires,the scoring system in an organizations with existing constituencies. a discussion at Glendale Regional Park of their program.For out-of-school youth, application or request for proposal(RFP) The loyal followers of these businesses and already cognizant of how the partnership Glendale can offer occupational training process could take into account whether nonprofits will show up to activities they 9 fits into their strategic plans,and this in rounds maintenance and skilled a business is minority-or woman-owned. produce in the park,diminishing the need should be part of the criteria used when landscaping and gardening.This could Recommendations include adding this to promote them and helping to seed a base selecting partners. create mutually beneficial opportunities for component to scoring proposals as part of level of activity. Glendale,the City,and citywide residents, a larger change that would seek to qualify Workforce Development providing Glendale Regional Park with extra concessionaires prior to their launch in the The City can specifically target help at a reduced cost and creating a new park and institute minimum standards for organizations who primarily work The third part of a strategy for Glendale Regional Park to succeed in community source of education andjob opportunities operation. with constituencies that are usually for emerging gardeners. underrepresented at parks,specifically engagement goals of partnering with the in Glendale.A successful strategy will City to combat park inequity and advance Whether or not occupational training is a Programming Vendor Contracting park inclusivity,is to partner explicitly with possibility, y pathways build these relationships systematically p y,the City can create athwa s to There are a variety of types of programming and incrementally;it's important to be a workforce development program and employment for workforce development partnerships,but the most straightforward realistic about how many of and how often leverage the program as a resource for program graduates,such as prioritizing partnership involves the City hiring an their audience will travel to the park,and Glendale. graduates in the hiring process.An individual or business to perform a service for partnerships to develop organically.A exclusive hiring window should be created (as opposed to a partner providing in-kind programming partnership might start with Paid Internships for prospective employees referred by services or the City and the partner having one or a few events each year,and grow a workforce development partner with a cost-sharing relationship).Common through successful participation. Glendale Regional Park can offer paid a commitment on the City's part to hire examples are fitness classes,art classes, internships for in-school youth in a variety qualified applicants from the pool of of areas.Programming and marketing graduates.Prioritized job opportunities and the vendors who provide equipment or Building Capacity in Partner g pp furnishings for larger events. are two likely sectors where there will be could include positions in sanitation, Organizations a need for interns and reciprocal interest maintenance,landscaping,hospitality,and Similar to the mobile concessions RFP on the part of students.Work in these two customer service.Graduates of workforce p y can an explicit benefit third-party organizations by process,the City make licit Programming partnerships can also areas can often be broken into discrete, development programs typically perform commitment to prioritizing people of color seasonal efforts(i.e.,helping to launch better and are retained by employers at when it hires artists to teach a watercolor helping them better fulfill their missions or manageprograms,specific ,creating(in the case of nonprofits),exposing them p p g g a higher rate than people recruited from class,fitness instructors to lead classes and to new audiences,and building their content for specific social media campaigns publicjob postings. other vendors. in-house capacity.By working with the or events,etc.).In addition,internships City at Glendale Regional Park,nonprofit could focus on special projects such as Programming Partnerships organizations may be more likely to building an historic photo archive of Raging Targeting Underrepresented secure grants or be able to pursue grant Waters that could get incorporated into a opportunities that they may not have future augmented reality component of a Audiences otherwise been eligible for.Cost-sharing mobile app,targeted donor/grant research, In addition to establishing and expanding arrangements make it affordable for some or administering and helping to analyze a fee-based programming,the City survey of park visitors. should create a wide variety of new free 51 1 The Vision THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK The Vision 1 52 Goals & Metrics Measuring Progress - * ` Gauging elements of the final concept plan through performance-based evaluation provides a measure to determine if goals set during the beginning of the park planning process are being attained.The following metrics evaluate the park design according to original park goals. ..P.�� ... �... .. ... .. .. •1,� j � -��- _ - � t 3, ^�*t.s.�Y "v ryQ4.-ee -a. r iQQ'Q� r y . ...,r 4 a Y 53 The Vision Trails&Connectivity � ►Goal Regional Connection - _ �:;:' 5 Public Lands spaces connected ,� 1700 South Par • afterla .�. .,r.2 New Connections:A new crossing crossing recommendations are • 4 linking to 1700 South Park • connectbridge linking to the Jordan River Parkway will Surplus Canal Trail and a proposed multi-use path along 1700 South to create a Glendale Trail Triangle. Trails lilendalePaek '�" , Enhanced Public - - r � '` 1 t need for enhanced public - �.'� `�`� '�� s � ���'.' •"� v' ��� ``� � transit access to Glendale �' UTA and other transit - - ' organizations will be 'd �'" �` ' required in order to ++street provide equitable and Jordan - parkway regional access to the Glendale Hiking Trail site. 0 NewConnections Community Spaces- Plan Metrics J. .• ` �� - �! 1,713 Community members - - involved in the planning process. Community Services& Programming 29 Activities&amenities added to the site. — Park Activation&Safety r � 1 00%Individual elements in the park are ADA accessible Regional Connection - 8 new and unique recreation opportunities introduced to the citywide Public Lands'system. �.. 4. �_- __�l'—�. • r A"; ;; w may. Community Spaces Active Play-High Programming Community Gathering-High Programming 55 1 The Vision Environmental-Plan Metrics 77 3.4 '- Access • Nature 4.5 Acres of natural areas added hY • that provide public access " ' -T Environmental Quality — , 1 J Acres riparian habitat restored [ y 1 ram» 41L> ■� Environmental r Impervious surfaces reduced by ! J 50% im rovin water ualit ands p g q Y ° replenishing groundwater* t .•.°� EnvironmentalPar - ° r _ 10.9 Acres of native&waterwise ' planting reduces water use Soft&Hardscape Native/Water Wise Planting& *See page 20 for previous site surface Turf calculations Asphalt-8% Planted Landscape-64% Riparian Concrete-13% Crushed Granite Paths-6% **Hardscape includes some Park Features/Structures-6% Dog Park/Sand Beach-3% Native Grass&Shrubland impervious crushed granite pathways Site Impervious Surfaces:27% Site Impervious Surfaces:73% Hardscape** The Vision 156 Implementation Phasing Strategv_.j_ - Implementation Phase I The park will be implemented in a series of phases.Many factors are contributing to the decision-making process examining which elements will be included in phase one of park rciiiilllllll implementation.Most notably,according to the requirements set by the Land and Water • — Conservation Fund,outdoor recreation amenities in the park must be available to the public _ •• xr1 by spring of 2024.This expedited schedule requires consideration for park features that are easily implementable,can meet a rapid construction timeline and that fit within the current . � , - budget allocated for the park. �1 �• Other phase one considerations include the need to group park features and improvements --ctiop into a consolidated area,creating a fully functioning park with a variety of activities and -4ACS&_ amenities prior to the completion of future phases.Consolidating developed areas of the park allows the remaining undeveloped areas to be strategically fenced,limiting access .` � -.�•�•C � -� } to hazards left from previous water park infrastructure.The fencing plan also facilitates ,�-LI a - _ Irk phasing strategies for vegetative restoration,weed abatement and site preparation for future phases while mitigating exposure to visually unattractive,undeveloped areas. _ Public input is another consideration shaping phase one features.Some of the top park • r •`�� features that are desired by the neighborhood,such as an outdoor pool,cannot be r 04,L• '• ' •r accommodated in the first phase due to cost,a lengthier construction time frame,and the FL time required to work through possible partnership logistics. } % %%• _,• } 7 However,park features that are most desired by the community and can meet the criteria N' ` 4 . . '' y�� ' :'� ' 3 _� mentioned above are being given top priority for inclusion in phase one.This includes a , L d F i # + _E 9 1. '� multi-use sports court and an all-ages and abilities playground.Other desired features will �. .4 ..1 4' -L1 Ir r, be filled by interim elements,such as food trucks being stationed in the parking lot before = ~+• •� a formal community plaza is fully built out,access to hiking on the hill before formal trails + r S rL are installed,and a kayak rental locker included next to the existing boat ramp prior to full i• r E , '� enhancements being completed along the Jordan River. �ti XOWL, I or � F , '. r Future phases of the park will be implemented as quickly as funding and logistics can be navigated.Grant,donation and partnership opportunities which align with park goals and F r proposed features and programming will be expeditiously explored to realize the full site ' # yr - design and potential for a regional-quality park in the Westside. 1 1 1=i I A ' . •� ti L - , , 59 Implementation Phasing Diagram Segmented Phasing Zones - •t { AA» The diagram highlights phase one elements, which will be completed by spring of 4 f ,r -fir 2024.All other portions of the park will be completed in future phases. _ Anticipated future phase elements are segmented into park feature zones for I� K - __ - _ - - -- flexible implementation.These smaller zones may be implemented simultaneously •••�•.•... .' � or phased incrementally as park funding and partnerships become feasible. _ 1 1 Outdoor 1 1 1 Swimming 1 1 The diagram suggests a possible phasing Ir t Pool © 1 sequence to prioritize park features that 1 ` Boat Ramp, 1 Parking& are popular with the community while also p' 1 � w•.•r ♦ � Uock, S Phase 7 Community J* 1 Drop-off 1 utilizingarks ace to the greatest possible Plaza I � >s# &Re'ntal , P P 9 N Staltion extent.This phasing order should be flexible 1 Water Feature % in response to partnership and funding 1 /� PLauun&X ,�� I opportunities as well as available funding �•� j i Performa and the cost to develop each phasing zone. �-•�•� � Space � Hill with ♦ • Skateboarding 1 1 Overlook& ♦ �� Skatin ©� Trails/Dog Area '% j & Park Riverside • % 1 Beach& r••` Boardwalk Potential partnerships 0 Community input/popular features Hazards Consolidating developed park areas to maximize park Ci functionality and use Sequencing development 0 for maximized park use _ and access throughout 1 - - - '• • - '1the construction and development process •- - ••-• t - -• • - -•- • • •�•I - ri an•restoration efforts Implementation 160 • e e a OSoufhPark +F� t II � • • r - � � Circulate"f19tFo�gh I t mom' �p�9jX E� j i �•t j I 8 ' • ••• -. 10 1 f4� • yr> •.' - olendalePark AN&• • y : o� ! f 10 • • • • �, Undeveloped • �. , � i" ,;� '�r'�" 12 •:•• '• • - . •2 ffF• w�thNative ' - - � � � 1�• Landscape `..' . i t• aI c • •:1 •�- • 1. 1'2• � •- � ea '•ol aleoolftourse �_ ,�A ` '^'�irr.•\•�lr�•••• • •• 9 >oaaa r • f. Ir - Temporary Hillside — Restoration Area Fencing Rhase 1 v _ Phase 1 Programming Opportunities Children/family Family fitness activities All-ability movement r Music/literary education Organized play activities Animal education events r • " River Programming Safety and awareness i Skillsworkshops Habitat education Volunteerevents Outdoor/environmental Nature meditative walks Birding/wildlife workshops rs ,� ,.�� -.,•" _ � � Gardens/horticulture Public art } M k w � Arts/culture/community �A; _; �• Audiencearea r. P. a`�:,, �\:` r1. Outdoor movies Fenced/estoration Area Lawn games � Sports courts i C )i Clinics/lessons Rstoi Area All-ability skills training Arts/culture/community Art cart .`�►� . '^• r Arts and crafts Small music/performance Literary events #.- Lectures Board games Temporary Hillside Fitness/recreation/events Restoration Area Low impact fitness Protective . R' Organized recreation/workshops Fencing Phase I +' S Community cultural events Outdoor hobbyist activities Implementation 1 62 Opinion of Probable Cost Phase 1 Phase 1 Costs l �w, , ,� R The project team developed phase one to �► st; +r► propose a set of amenities that could be implemented,pending contractor bids,with Phase I current funding.These elements include an ambitious set of improvements that can be I _ — 1 accomplished for 3.5 to 5.5 million dollars. - 4 r° Phase one was designed to maximize usable park features and efficiently utilize 11111 11111 © � funding as it comprises only approximately 10%of the total park cost yet completes \ 30%of the full park buildout. Further design and cost estimating is nA o needed to understand the true costs of the proposed amenities.This proposal is based on current construction costs and contracting pricing is likely to be much higher two years from now. .=y Phasing Zone Costs As detailed design is completed for each phase,a true understanding of cost will Full Park Build Out be established.Some park elements have much higher costs associated with them such as the pool and the skating ribbon and will vary in range of cost depending on the Full Park Build Out length of time it takes to implement them. See the phasing diagram on page 60 for the h1 recommended phasing approach. ° 1 1 1 1 Full Park Build Out Cosh 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 Full build out of all park elements could s range in cost from 30 to 50 million dollars depending on how long it takes to fully implement all park features.The sooner >4 ° ° the site is redeveloped and the fewer the phases of development,the more cost o y,c •.., ••. efficient it is to construct the park. to _ Gw 63 Implementation Phase 1 RW11estoration Strate'% � I. gy �1�1 de Phase I Ecological a µ•_ � - �a:� � '' ; Recommendations ♦ f Phase one ecological improvements { 9 include riparian and planting enhancement Y�• ' ( I I along the riverside.With exception of consideration for future riverside q improvements such as a new boat ramp and boardwalk,these areas will remain largely undeveloped and initial efforts toward a permanent,long-term restoration plan should take place.Public Lands will prioritize restoration efforts based on } recommendations to the greatest extent possible,but will also evaluate capacity, *� management and staffing considerations for prioritization of areas. 19 `, ' In the western,developed portions of the park,ornamental plants will be included as part of the park design.The planting selection should consist of native,water- wise and climate adaptive plants that will utilize less water,tolerate heat in a changing �*• f climate and provide ecological benefits for birds and pollinators. j - The remaining portions of the site will be prepared for future phases with — � transitional restoration efforts.These i areas will be seeded with native grasses ti and wildflowers as an intermediate --. - restoration step,providing a solution ' for weed mitigation,soil retention,and providing ecological benefits until further site development and restoration efforts • • are completed. - See the full restoration strategy • • I on the following pages for further 011 ' - • • • " .ram recommendations on preserving tree canopy. Implementation 64 Restoration Ecological Recommendations The planning team's ecological expert,River Restoration,conducted a site visit of the egy Glendale Regional Park on August 23,2021,to evaluate the current ecological conditions of Stratthe project area and to determine what features should be retained for ecological reasons. f' This assessment,included in Appendix B,resulted in the identification of trees and habitats l that should be retained as possible.Areas for potential enhancement were also identified p and include all existing riparian forest and a buffer of 50-300'from the river.Seethe 'N.�ry a,< ��yC,' r ,- � `� /4�" restoration diagrams on the following page for recommended restoration areas. .0. ` ' Riparian Restoration and Tree Canopy The current state of the riparian forest in and around the project area is in a degraded condition.Some of the existing large trees within the project area have a high value,since they are well established and seem to be healthy.The sycamore trees are of high value y ' OV and should be considered to protect in place,since they are mature,well-established,and IN healthy.The existing trees along the park strip at the north of the project area should also Vy ;r L be preserved to maintain this important buffer from 1700 South.The remaining groves of 4 trees can be evaluated on acase-by-case basis for phased removal or replacement with planted and irrigated multi-layer riparian areas.The diagram on the next page shows areas M1� of existing riparian trees that could be retained. Habitat improvements are a key goal of the Project and phasing the project's construction will reduce potential impacts to the site's current wildlife population by limiting the amount '1�. of area that will be disturbed at any one time while leaving undisturbed portions to provide • ar „ t' -. habitat.This applies particularly to habitat for migratory song birds.Partners working along the Jordan River Corridor have recommended a phased approach for removal of Russian olives,which serve as habitat for migratory and resident bird species.Russian olive should be left on portions of the site that are not part of the initial phases and riparian plants _ should be planted into Russian olive stands,where the shade from the existing invasive trees will help with establishment of new forests.Areas where Russian olive was removed should be the top priority for restoration of riparian forests to return the multi-layer canopy for nesting and migratory birds. Site Restoration Treatments See the Phase I Restoration Diagram on page 64 for restoration treatment priority areas. Full recommendations can be found in Appendix C,Restoration Plan. Treatments proposed for summer and fall of 2022 include: Aggressive chemical control of noxious weeds to follow up on areas treated in 2021. = K Aggressive chemical treatment of hoary cress and phragmites in areas along the riverbanks where Russian olive was cut down. Chemical control of noxious weeds in all disturbance areas. - - Seeding of all disturbed areas with an inexpensive grass/forb mix. 65 Implementation Site Restoration Strategy Site Preparation +k •i M1 Aggressive chemical control of noxious , weeds adjacent to all disturbance areas should be a high priority.These are the �; " most likely places for spread of noxioust� and invasive plants.These areas should i a c9 _ ► also be seeded soon after the disturbance ceases(generally within 2 weeks any time � •, ,. � i I- of the year)with an inexpensive grass and a forb mix.This should be done any time disturbances occur throughout the project f' i t l � � lifecycleto reduce the opportunity for -- noxious plants to dominate.This is cheap insurance and will reduce the potential - need for chemicals to be used on the site in the future. 12"of topsoil for the disturbed area will AV be needed for grasses to establish while 'r `•� k, "planting pockets"that have soil depths up to 36"will be needed to allow small trees and t•, i ^> ' shrubs to be established.It would be good to add terraces on the hill with up to 3'of topsoil,allowing for larger shrubs and trees :�. •� � �;>``- _� • ��,1 to establish. z } -- { r Ecological Stewardship 'hid The local and regional context was evaluated to discover opportunities for N • ecological enhancement and stewardship. r } ~ Students from Glendale Middle School have •*- ' previously provided stewardship for areas just downstream of the project and Jordan ~ =�- River Park.The future stewardship of the natural areas in the vicinity of the project • • i ,�!,;, should involve local schools and community partners. - There are also opportunities fora r, broader connection to the river both up .- y_ r'� and downstream.Development of on water recreation opportunities is one of the highest values of the site from a stewardship perspective. Implementation 66 Planting Pa lette o`�Scyptandrus J�Smithii i Water-Wise Planting oa �A` ' � The plantingpaletteh� � y�o shows examples of " ;a ya' ' ��� �{ ` 4 Riverside Plants possible plants for37 t�k�a�, �� 1 `' . Saltgrass,Inland Glendale Park.The plant ,4a% `�°��"'�z4�'` � � Distichlisspicata i� a, selection should include Western wheatgrass native,water-wise and Pascopyrum smithii !t�i climate adaptive species Sand Dro seed Western Wheat grass ep Inland Saltgrass which use less water p g Fesc Luca o in Festuca ovine and provide habitat for pollinators and wildlife, p�istata �Cuiata Freemont Cottonwood e�ontii Populus fremontii It tit 4, * Apache Plume � Hillside/Meadow Plants ci Fallugia paradoxa 4 i Sand Dropseedt? . +� Skunkbush sumac � Sporobolus cryptandrus Rhus trilobata Blanket Flower ' � Wood's rose Gaillardia Aristata y > Rosa woodsii Lewis Blue Flax Linum lewisii Blanket Flower Rocky Mountain Golden currant Freemont Bee Plant Ribes aureum Cottonwood Western Wheatgrass Pascopyrum smithii `� coccinea Green rabbitbrush daXa 0 Crysothamnus viscidiflorus to �a�c aka V°�4 :r,, Rocky Mountain Bee Plant Z *, t 2 Marsh milkweed Cleome serrulata ;y� �T Asclepsia incarnate ,r 4 n Bluegrass,Sandberg Solidagocanadensis I � Poa Sandbergii Canada goldenrod i Scarlet Globemallow Wooly sedge Sphaeralcea coccinea �', ? Carex pellita Alkali sacaton Sporobolus airoides Lewis Blue Flax Scarlet Globemallow Apache Plume 67 Implementation ```ufata a`,fora �9atum Climate Adaptive Trees Native&Water Wise Japanese Tree Lilac Ornamental Plants Syringa reticulata Ivory Tower Yucca Shademaster Honeylocust Yucca flacida'Ivory Tower' Gleditsia triacanthos inermis , Japanese Tree Desert Four O'Clock Desert Four Shenandoah Switch Gambel Oak Mirabilis multiflora Quercus gambelii Lilac O-Clock Grass Catalpa ,avant h os,per Fire re Chalice ria(Epilobium)californica pajMe r li S`nens i s Catalpa speciosa ,aZauschn �p'� �rJS 4 anti n 3 Palmer's Penstemon y'�e `a0 Fairmount Ginkgo ��► r Penstemon palmeri Qy F.`' d tom' Ginkgo biloba'Fairmount' .. Prairie Winecups Golden Candle Rain Tree _ � Callirhoe involucrata , Koelreuteria paniculata 'Golden Candle' Coneflower Bristlecone Pine Echinacea Pinus aristata Hummingbird Mint Pinyon Pine Shademaster Agastache'Desert Sunrise' Palmer's Pinus edulis Honeylocust Penstemon Graziella Maiden Little Bluestem Utah Juniper pefjj Schizachyrium scoparium Grass �acilis Juniperus osteosperma 9a't'� 0 a� Blonde Ambition Blue Grama Grass e NO ��� Boutelouagracilis'BlondeAmbition' `�C ,tee Water-Wise Shurbs o W Alderleaf Mountain Mahogany Shenandoah Switch Grass m Cercocarpus montanus ' ' Panicum virgatum'Shenandoah' Apache Plume Ravenna Grass Fallugia paradoxa Saccharum ravennae New Mexico Privet Graziella Maiden Grass Forestiera neomexicana Gambel Oak Miscanthussinensis'Graziella' Coneflower Blue Gramma Grass Implementation 1 68 Sustainable SITES Certi ication site during the design and construction process to ensurethatsustainable To support goals for ecological restoration practices are adhered to and that the Practices and sustainable park development,it proper documentation is collected to is recommended that the project team pursue certification.The full SITES pursue certification in a sustainability prescore worksheet for Glendale Regional program such as SITES or another Park in Appendix A. ;ti F comparable program.The project team has been exploring certification Pursuing SITES certification at Glendale through the Sustainable Sites Initiative Regional Park would demonstrate a tangible Y ) , g commitment to environmental quality and 7 tinit erti > , r���,.. (SITES)for the future Glendale Regional Park.SITES(sustainablesites.org/)is a justice.With historic underinvestment, c '' +�; ,.,�: r y .• sustainability focused program based lower levels of service and evidence of �'; '-'!'. - "�_ environmental injustices present in this _ t v on the understanding that any project nSrs• ,, ', community in the past,having a SITES ;' �_• �"� . ' r. ,' has the ability to protect,improve and r ,� �,,r �� r ; ;• certified landscape in the Glendale even regenerate healthy ecosystems by r�( r.,` r, t K neighborhood would not only highlight the �'! e t � ,. •,,a t° , reducing water use,filtering stormwater ' -. r •' " ••� '��; runoff,providing wildlife habitat,and City's investment in restorative landscapes , , * and climate resiliency but would also set a �t�} improving air quality and human health. standard for site development in the future The SITES certification is managed by and begin to show tangible effort towards the United States Green Building Council >, equitable environmental investment across �4 r W" (USGBC),the same agency that manages the LEED rating system for buildings. the City.With SITES certification,Glendale Where LEED addresses buildings and Regional Park would be a model of best vertical construction,the SITES rating practices and environmental achievement f y. system is used for everything related to the both locally and nationwide. landscape.Projects pursuing certification often incur higher costs in design and oo 6� ..+• `' construction,however,they consistently return significant long term cost savings �' •- ', X related to ongoing operations and t _ . r �`•„ maintenance costs. During the master planning process,a SITES pre-score assessment,shown in :',• Table 1 confirmed that the Glendale Park 1 ' • ,� '`r project meets the qualifications to pursue SITES certification.Upon scoring the project,the Glendale Regional Park Site has the potential to certify on the Platinum level if the City elects to pursue certification • I to the greatest extent.The project team 1• recommends pre-certifying the entire park master plan for the 17-acre 69 l Chapter Two Table 1:SITES Certification Pre-Score SITES Scorecard Summary YES e NO YES NO DESIGN Y CONTEXTPI.1 Limit development on farmland HHWBC6.1 Protect and maintain cultural and historic places 2to3 Y CONTEXTPI.2 Protect fioodplainfunctions HHWBC6.2 Provide opti mu m site accessibility,safety,and wayfind ing 2 Y GONTEXTPI.3 Conserve aquatic ecosystems HHWBC6.3 Promote equitable site use 2 Y CONTEXTPIA Conserve habitats for threatened and endangered species HHWBC6.4 Support mental restoration 2 CONTEXTCI.5 Redevelop degraded sites 3to6 HHWBC6.5 Support physical activity 2 CONTEXTCI.6 Locate projects within existing developed areas 4 HHWBC6.6 Support social connection 2 CONTEXTCI.7 Connect to multi-modal transit networks 2to3 HHWBC6.7 Provide on-site food p reduction 3to4 HHWBC6.8 Reduce light pollution 4 2:PRE-DESIGN ASSESSMENT-PLANNING Possible Points: 3 HHWBC6.9 Encourage fuel efficient and multi-modal transportation 4 Y PRE-DESIGN P2.1 Use an integrative design process HHWBC6.10 Minimize exposureto environmental tobacco smoke 1to2 Y PRE-DESIGNP2.2 Conduct a pre-design site assessment HHWBC6.11 Support local economy 3 Y PRE-DESIGN P2.3 Designate and communicate VSP7s PRE-DESIGN C2.4 Engage users and stakeholders 37:CONSTRUCTION Possible Points: 17 Y CONSTRUCTIONP7.1 Communicate and verify sustainable construction practices 3:SITE t Y CONSTRUCTION P7.2 Control and retain construction pollutants Y WATER P3.1 Manage precipitation on site Y CONSTRUCTION P7.3 Restore soils disturbed during construction Y WATER P3.2 Reduce water use for landscape irrigation CONSTRUCTION CIA Restore soils disturbed by previous development 3to5 WATERC3.3 Manage precipitation beyond baseline 4to6 CONSTRUCTIONC7.5 Divert construction and demolition materials from disposal 3to4 WATERC3.4 Reduce outdoor water use 4to6 CONSTRUCTIONC7.6 Divert reusable vegetation,rocks,and soil from disposal 3to4 WATERC3.5 Design functional stormwater featu res as amenities 4to5 CONSTRUCTION C7.7 Protect air quality during construction 2to4 WATERC3.6 Restore aquatic ecosystems 4to6 8.OPERATIONS MAIN I TENANCE Possible Points: 22 4:SITE r r Y O+MP8.1 Plan for sustainable site maintenance Y SOIL+VEG P4.1 Create and communicate a soil management plan Y O+M P8.2 Provide for storage and collection ofrecyclables Y SOIL+VEG P4.2 Control and manage invasive plants O+M C8.3 Recycle organic matter 3to5 Y SOIL+VEGP4.3 Use appropriate plants O+MC8.4 Minimize pesticide and fertilizer use 4to5 SOIL+VEGC4.4 Conserve healthy soils and appropriate vegetation 4to6 O+MC8.5 Reduce outdoor energy consumption 2to4 SOIL+VEG C4.5 Conserve special status vegetation 4 O+M C8.6 Use renewable sources for landscape electricity needs 3to4 SOIL+VEG C4.6 Conserve and use native plants 3to6 O+M C8.7 Protect air quality during landscape maintenance 2to4 SOIL+VEGC4.7 Conserve and restore native plant communities 4to6 SOIL+VEGC4.8 Optimize biomass 1to6 9.EDUCATIONMONITORING SOIL+VEG C4.9 Reduce urban heat island effects 4 EDUCATIONC9.1 Promote sustainabilityawareness and education 3to4 SOIL+VEG C4.10 Use vegetation to minimize building energy use Ito4 EDUCATIONC9.2 Develop and communicate a case study 3 SOIL+VEGC4.11 Reduce the risk ofcatastrophic wildfire 4 EDUCATIONC9.3 Plan to monitor and report site performance 4 SELECTION5:SITE DESIGN-MATERIALS t INNOVATION OR EXEMPLARY PERFORMANCE Y MATERIALS P5.1 Eliminate the use ofwood from threatened tree species INNOVATIONC10.1 Innovation or exemplary performance 3to9 MATERIALSC5.2 Maintain on-site structures and paving 2to4 MATERIALSC5.3 Design for adaptability and disassembly 3to4 YES ? NO MATERIALSC5.4 Use salvaged materials and plants 3to4 TOTAL MATERIALSC5.5 Use recycled content materials 3to4 MATERIALSC5.6 Use regional materials 3to5 KEY SITES Certification levels Points MATERIALSC5.7 Support responsible extraction of raw materials 1to5 YES Project confident points are achievable CERTIFIED 70 MATERIALSC5.8 Support transparency and safer chemistry 1to5 ? Project striving to achieve points,not 100%confident SILVER 85 MATERIALSC5.9 Support sustainability in materials manufacturing 5 NO Project is unable to achieve these credit points GOLD 100 MATERIALSC5.10 Support sustainability in plant production 1to5 PLATINUM 135 ChapterTwo 70 Policies,Operations&Maintenance �• In order to ensure the new Glendale Regional Park stays clean,active,safe and well-loved by the greater Salt Lake City community,it must be maintained and staffed accordingly along with the many amenities,natural features,and programming elements being designed.To achieve this high standard,the City will need to make special considerations for Glendale ' Park's operations staffing required to support the appropriate levels of security,sanitation, public realm maintenance,landscaping,programmatic operations,event needs,park concession leasing,and marketing as described below. Security a A strong perception and reality of safety in the park will greatly enhance the park's ability to attract visitors,particularly families,and increase an overall sense of civic pride and support for the park.In keeping with many long established precedents for increasing the"eyes and ears"in the park,it will be important to create many positive reasons for the public to be active in the park throughout the day to dispel any would be antisocial behavior, and actively patrol the park with appropriate levels of official park staff-whether they be City park rangers or,when necessary,police.The"right"levels and types of staff will depend greatly on several design decisions including potential building/concession uses,recreation and aquatic uses,degrees of programming and events,and real time security concerns/ ■� . . - conditions in the neighborhood when the park opens. _ Many decisions around types and levels of security(and other operations)staff will depend on the ultimate physical plan and associated decisions around park management and governance-i.e.,whether the City alone will manage and program the park or whether that d•j it will happen in partnership or coordination with a private management entity(or several). Park rules 1 z� Because of the many unique features and activities planned,a set of rules should be specifically developed for Glendale Park,incorporating the City's existing rules and regulations for all public parks.An abbreviated version of those rules should be posted - _ visibly around the park to help regulate the public use and provide clear expectations as to - which activities and behaviors are acceptable and which are not.Setting these expectations and messaging them the right way will add to the public's perception of safety in the park f and help park staff to enforce appropriate behavior. 71 Implementation During larger events(festivals,musical attention,which should be provided by Large events may incur the need for performances,larger markets)the event the concession workers.These types of additional janitorial staff to clean producer,park management entity,or services can often be negotiated as part of restrooms,pick up trash,and empty trash the City may need to employ additional, the operator agreements depending on the and recycling. contracted security staff and parking specific concession.Giving an operator the attendants. option to custom brand the tables,seats, Repairs/Maintenance K r trash cans,or umbrellas within the vicinity , A P� Janitorial of their space(and charging them for the There should be a streamlined process to right to do so)will motivate them to keep address maintenance issues,one that is Janitorial and sanitation issues in the public these areas and the associated furnishings not burdened with moving through many realm are often caused by a shortage of clean. chains of command or requiring excess staff,having only one shift of staff,lack of paperwork whenever possible.Staff J resources/staff that are spread too thin Trash and recycling cans should be located specifically assigned to Glendale Park, at regular intervals throughout the park, over multiple parks,or a cumbersome and either from the City or contracted through � • bureaucratic process for addressing issues and especially at areas of anticipated heavy a park management entity,should be as they arise.By appropriately staffing the traffic such as play areas and picnic areas, empowered to fix smaller problems under a trouble janitorial crew and having more than one so that visitors do not have any pre-determined threshold promptly without - shift in the day as necessary(fewer shifts finding the receptacle.Trash and recycling the need for higher levels of approval. on slow days and more/overlapping shifts should be emptied from cans multiple times on peak days),restrooms can be checked, a day and taken to a designated collection Furnishings and other items need to be cleaned,and resupplied often,trash cans point,and trash and recycling should be checked frequently and repaired upon can be emptied multiple times a day,litter moved off-site at least once a day.Trash and the first sign of an issue.This will ensure can be picked up regularly by hand,graffiti recycling cans should be paired and kept broken items do not get worse and more can be removed immediately,and other together(or split between one receptacle difficult to fix and avoid potential injury/ small issues can be addressed in a timely but clearly distinguished),otherwise park liability concerns.Fixing them right away manner before snowballing into more patrons will throw whatever they are also shows the public that furnishings significant,more costly problems.If the disposing into whichever receptacle is and facilities in the park are cared for and park is maintained with a high standard closest,regardless of its intended contents. looked after.If visitors observe a well- of park,they are more likely f of cleanliness,expectations will be raised Thejanitorial staff should take care of minor to follow suit and take good care of the and perceptions of care will spread to the repairs such as repainting over graffiti, public ark with furnishings and facilities themselves. p p tightening a leaky faucet,or patching a hole respect.Park cleanliness will also impact in the concrete.Larger maintenance and Thejanitorial staff will address smaller perceptions of safety to the community. repair projects will be tasked to the capital issues such as replacing broken trash Concession staff,if applicable,should projects staff and contractors.Janitorial cans,cleaning out the drains of drinking augment janitorial staff in the immediate staff should also be tasked with everyday fountains,screwing in a door hinge, area of the concessions.When there is a landscape upkeep including weeding, replacing light bulbs,and painting over slower moment,concession staff should sweeping up excess leaf litter and plant graffiti.An Operations Manager or similar regularly wipe tables,pick up trash,empty debris,and reporting irrigation leaks, position should oversee capital projects, trash cans,straighten tables and chairs, irrigation malfunction,or poor plant health major repairs,and landscape maintenance. and even service restrooms.Concession to a supervisor. This manager will also oversee third-party areas have heavy use and require special contractors who would take care of larger Implementation 172 and more specialized maintenance and site.Tree root ball moisture and shrub and within the park.The leasing agents should repair needs such as fixing plumbing issues, groundcover surrounding soil moisture focus on an operator mix that supports repairing broken stairs,electrical repairs, should be checked weekly and watering Glendale Park's overall programming/ building maintenance,etc.Ideally this would cycles adjusted accordingly.Watering activity goals,focuses on local businesses, be a dedicated person to Glendale Park,or records should be kept for all site trees and has a quality/healthful product,delivers someone who oversees multiple parks with a yearly water audit should be performed to on financial objectives,and supports the « (t appropriate support staff. track the amount of water applied.With this needs of the surrounding neighborhood. Ilan►.I', information,Public Lands can determine Partnerships or City programs that work During major repairs,trees and plant appropriate water application for site trees independently and/or with leasing agents _ I materials should be protected with fences after the three-year establishment period to support no or low-cost activities will be or other barriers to prevent damage.Heavy ends,in consultation with Urban Forestry's important to include as regular options for equipment should not be left or stored�+ review of tree health on the site.Irrigation Glendale Park programming. 1 1 under the branches of trees,as this can systems will need frequent inspection and cause root damage,or for extended periods Marketing for Glendale Park offerings �� „• cleaning to ensure the system is running 1? on lawn. properly. should start with a dedicated website and *� social media accounts(primarily Instagram 4,' w s., Landscape/Tree Crews should weed planted areas and Facebook)that are frequently updated ,;�- C• + Maintenance and frequently,maintain the depth of mulch with news and happenings.A dedicated to reduce evaporation and inhibit weed online presence is the best way for visitors Management growth,and apply fertilizers as needed. to find out about programs and events Trees and understory require attention Crews will employ principles of Integrated happening in the park and nearby public/ on a consistent and on-going basis.The Pest Management to prevent plant pests City affairs.The website will also serve + landscape maintenance crew should have and diseases.Landscape maintenance as a tool for customer service,a guide for demonstrated experience in maintenance should be performed during regular work private event permitting,a place to receive t of public landscape projects of similar size hours to not disturb the nearby residents inquiries,comments,and complaints. and scope with owner references,and with noise. It's important for these outlets to be .,A the dedicated responsibility of one staff demonstrated experience with integrated An important part of a maintenance plan ( pest management,pest control,soils, member or contractor,rather than spread •.j� t;� p g p for Glendale Park will be a landscape to several undefined staff so this important fertilizers,and plant identification. feature/materials inventory with suggested element doesn't become neglected in favor + All Assuming proper installation,trees and maintenance and a working checklist of staff's primary responsibilities. understory will need regular inspection than can be provided as for the landscape "oil ! — "0, by Public Land's Urban Forestry Division maintenance crew. to ensure proper growth.Pruning weak t branches and shaping tree crowns will Leasing/Marketing help sustain long-term health,growth,and a appearance. Leasing and partnership agreements, either through the relevant City agency As trees and plant material are put in the or through a park management entity, ground,flow meters should be installed will select the appropriate tenants for any that monitor all irrigation hydrazones for kiosks,cafe space,river concessions,and �,, • appropriate water application across the any other commercially operable spaces 73 Implementation Programming&Activation Programming Budget and budgets fall short,the park programming Table 2:Programming&Activation Budget Recommended Minimum Staffing manager will be able to leverage DIRECT STAFFING COSTS programming partners and interested On site programming manager $76,000 Base starting salary of$60,000 annually.Budget To support a vibrant and dynamic groups to provide in-kind donations of includesfringe benefits. Glendale Regional Park,a dedicated time and materials,sponsorships,and Park attendants $18,200 16 hrs/wk year round,$17.50 wage plus 25%fully loaded. park programming manager should be other sources that reduce capital outlays. overtime allowance $4,550 May also be used for discretionary bonuses put in place,as well as a dedicated and Providing a baseline budget of some Administration/insurance - Assumes covered by City poliices predictable budget that grows over time amount allows the programming manager Equipment/supplies $10,000 Laptop for manager,smartphones/tablets for through revenue development.The park to plan accordingly and approach potential attendant use,general supplies should be viewed as a business,with profits partners more efficiently.Over time,the r5edicated staffing subtota and losses,except that all profits should be budget hopefully grows,with revenue made with the public interest in mind and, sources coming from a variety of potential HYPOTHETICAL DIRECT YEAR I thus,reinvested back into the park for the sources:philanthropy,sponsorships,event PROGRAMMING COSTS benefit of local residents and visitors. rentals,food and beverage,programming, Arts&culture $80,000 Two-thirds of this cost is annual,cutting edge and government support. interactive art installations The park programming manager would Fitness $30,000 Mostly provided byfree businesses seeking to be an on-site Public Lands employee, market their classes but assigned specifically to Glendale Hobbies&niche interests $45,000 Includes outdoor dancing,which is aboutone- Regional Park on a day-to-day basis with third of the total budget a flexible schedule that likely includes a Live entertainment $100,000 Does not include production costs,which will be minimafive-day,Wednesday to Sunday schedule to Markets&festivals $100,000 Allowance for self-produced events complement active times in the park.The programming manager will be dedicated to coordinating with programming partners, SUPPLEMENTAL YEAR I interacting with park visitors,overseeing PROGRAMMING COSTS day-to-day management of facilities Marketing $50,000 Limited to promotion surrounding public space maintenance,and managing vendors programs and events and contractors.The park programming Holiday decorations $100,000 Allowance manager is the park's"mayor."The ideal manager will have experience in events management,and/or marketing, communications,urban planning,and business.The programming manager should also have access to park attendants on a part-time,as needed basis during busier times in the park and special events. As a baseline,the park should also have a dedicated programming budget that allows for a varied experience.Programming budgets are used to provide equipment, marketing,outreach,and supplies.Where Implementation 74 Spectrum of Private/Public Partnership Structures Governing Partnership& >L Management Activation and programming strategies, •:..aJ, � �,`. �..Y t V• _,_•`.� specifically around revenue development and sponsorship opportunities,benefit i greatly by the management structure that is in place.Public agencies will be able to do things the private sector can't,and vice versa.Exploring existing frameworks and ,!,� establishing programming and activation guidelines within those constraints will inform optimal programming strategies. Public • PublicManagement Joint Management Private Management Operation 1 Management Support111 I 75 I Implementation Next Steps To meet the rapid timeline required to open the park with publicly accessible recreation, detailed design and construction of Phase I elements will begin in August of 2022, concurrent to the adoption of the master plan.This process will entail refining specific park features and styles,as well as forming a strategy to re-purpose the old water slides _ — into park features or artwork.Programming opportunities with community partners will continue to be developed to ensure that the park remains an active space upon opening and k 1 throughout the development and construction process. U The project team will also begin to rehabilitate the site with riparian and native vegetation to fulfill the park goals of enhancing environmental quality and improving environmental justice for the Glendale neighborhood.To support this goal,it is recommended that the project team pursue certification in a sustainability program such as SITES or another comparable program.During the master planning process,a SITES prescore assessment confirmed that the Glendale Park project meets the qualifications to pursue SITES certification.As the project consultant moves into the next design phase,this consideration j should be integrated into the process to ensure that sustainable practices are adhered to and that the proper documentation is collected to pursue certification.The full SITES b prescore worksheet for Glendale Regional Park is in Appendix A. y � -J� u _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LJJ1 1 1 •� 1 1 1 1 1C161 ulit-PI1 1 Implementation 76 Contents APPENDIX A Sites pre-score APPENDIX B Ecological Assessment ■ APPENDIX C Restoration Plan Appendices APPENDIX D Market Study Appendix 1 78 Appendix A SITES Pre-Score SITES Certification&Prescore Assessment Glendale Regional Park goals include enhancing environmental quality and improving environmental justice for the Glendale neighborhood.To support this goal,it is recommended that the project team pursue certification in a sustainability program such as SITES or another comparable program.SITES,the landscape equivalent of LEED certification,is a sustainability framework and program that ensures best practices are adhered to during land development projects,resulting in enhanced ecosystems and landscape benefits such as"climate regulation,carbon storage and flood mitigation"' During the master planning process,a SITES prescore assessment confirmed that the Glendale Park project meets the qualifications to pursue SITES certification.As the project consultant moves into the next design phase,this consideration should be integrated into the process to ensure that sustainable practices are adhered to and that the proper documentation is collected to pursue certification.Appendix A includes the full SITES prescore worksheet and assessment for Glendale Regional Park. I https://sustainablesites.org/certification-guide �Qrl0lfdale� nal Pdrl[ Master Plan ScorecardSITES v2 , YES ? NO YES ? NO 0 0 0 1:SITE CONTEXT Possible Points: 13 0 0 0 6:SITE DESIGN-HUMAN HEALTH+WELL-BEING ' , Possible Points: Y "'° CONTEXT P3.1 Limit development on farmland HHWB C6.1 Protect and maintain cultural and historic places 2 to 3 E Y CONTEXT P3.2 Protect floodplain functions HHWB C6.2 Provide optimum site accessibility,safety,and wayfinding 2 Y CONTEXT P33 Conserve aquatic ecosystems HHWB C6.3 Promote equitable site use 2 Y CONTEXT P3.4 Conserve habitats for threatened and endangered species HHWB C6.4 Support mental restoration 2 CONTEXT C3.5 Redevelop degraded sites 3 to 6 HHWB C6.5 Support physical activity 2 CONTEXT C3.6 Locate projects within existing developed areas 4 HHWB C6.6 Support social connection 2 CONTEXT C3.7 Connect to multi-modal transit networks 2 to 3 HHWB C6.7 Provide on-site food production 3 to 4 HHWB C6.8 Reduce light pollution 4 0 0 0 2:PRE-DESIGN ASSESSMENT+PLANNING Possible Points: 3 HHWB C6.9 Encourage fuel efficient and multi-modal transportation 4 Y PRE-DESIGN P2.1 Use an integrative design process HHWB C6.30 Minimize exposure to environmental tobacco smoke 1 to 2 Y PRE-DESIGN P2.2 Conduct a pre-design site assessment HHWB C6.11 Support local economy 3 Y PRE-DESIGN P23 Designate and communicate VSPZs PRE-DESIGN C2.4 Engage users and stakeholders 3 0 0 0 7:CONSTRUCTION Possible Points: 17 Y CONSTRUCTION P7.1 Communicate and verify sustainable construction practices 0 0 0 3:SITE DESIGN-WATER Possible Points: 23 Y CONSTRUCTION P7.2 Control and retain construction pollutants Y WATER P3.1 Manage precipitation on site Y CONSTRUCTION P73 Restore soils disturbed during construction Y WATER P3.2 Reduce water use for landscape irrigation CONSTRUCTION C7.4 Restore soils disturbed by previous development 3 to 5 WATER C33 Manage precipitation beyond baseline 4 to 6 CONSTRUCTION C7.5 Divert construction and demolition materials from disposal 3 to 4 WATER C3.4 Reduce outdoor water use 4 to 6 CONSTRUCTION C7.6 Divert reusable vegetation,rocks,and soil from disposal 3 to 4 WATER C3.5 Design functional stormwater features as amenities 4 to 5 CONSTRUCTION C7.7 Protect air quality during construction 2 to 4 WATER C3.6 Restore aquatic ecosystems 4 to 6 0 0 0 8.OPERATIONS+MAINTENANCE M V Possible Points: 22 0 0 0 4:SITE DESIGN-SOIL+VEGETATION Possible Points: 40 Y O+M P8.1 Plan for sustainable site maintenance Y SOIL+VEG P4.1 Create and communicate a soil management plan Y O+M P8.2 Provide for storage and collection of recyclables Y ------- SOIL+VEG P4.2 Control and manage invasive plants O+M C83 Recycle organic matter 3 to 5 Ykiwi SOIL+VEG P43 Use appropriate plants O+M C8.4 Minimize pesticide and fertilizer use 4 to 5 SOIL+VEG C4.4 Conserve healthy soils and appropriate vegetation 4 to 6 O+M C8.5 Reduce outdoor energy consumption 2 to 4 SOIL+VEG C4.5 Conserve special status vegetation 4 O+M C8.6 Use renewable sources for landscape electricity needs 3 to 4 SOIL+VEG C4.6 Conserve and use native plants 3 to 6 O+M C8.7 Protect air quality during landscape maintenance 2 to 4 SOIL+VEG C4.7 Conserve and restore native plant communities 4to 6 SOIL+VEG C4.8 Optimize biomass 1 to 6 0 0 0 9.EDUCATION+PERFORMANCE MONITORING Possible Points: 11 SOIL+VEG C4.9 Reduce urban heat island effects 4 EDUCATION C9.1 Promote sustainability awareness and education 3 to 4 SOIL+VEG C4.30 Use vegetation to minimize building energy use 1 to 4 EDUCATION C9.2 Develop and communicate a case study 3 SOIL+VEG C4.11 Reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire 4 EDUCATION C93 Plan to monitor and report site performance 4 0 0 0 5:SITE DESIGN-MATERIALS SELECTION Possible Points: 41 0 0 0 10.INNOVATION OR EXEMPLARY PERFORMANCE Bonus Points: Y MATERIALS P5.1 Eliminate the use of wood from threatened tree species INNOVATION C10.1 Innovation or exemplary performance 3 to 9 MATERIALS C5.2 Maintain on-site structures and paving 2 to 4 MATERIALS C53 Design for adaptability and disassembly 3 to 4 YES ? NO MATERIALS C5.4 Use salvaged materials and plants 3 to 4 0 0 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED POINTS Total Possible Points: 200 MATERIALS C5.5 Use recycled content materials 3 to 4 MATERIALS C5.6 Use regional materials 3 to 5 KEY SITES Certification levels Points MATERIALS C5.7 Support responsible extraction of raw materials 1 to 5 YES Project confident points are achievable CERTIFIED 70 MATERIALS C5.8 Support transparency and safer chemistry 1 to 5 ? Project striving to achieve points,not 100%confident SILVER 85 Page 1 of 7 7/27/2022 Copyright 0 2014 Project Name: Project ID#: Date: • • MATERIALS C5.9 Support sustainability in materials manufacturing 5 NO Project is unable to achieve these credit points GOLD 100 MATERIALS C5.10 Support sustainability in plant production 1 to 5 PLATINUM 135 Page 2 of 7 7/27/2022 Copyright 0 2014 �Glendale� Regional Park 1111F�V Master Plan SITES v2Scorecard r Estimate points z below(key at a r bottom) , m PREREQUISITE OR z s YES ? NO CREDIT tt TITLE CASE/OPTION/THRESHOLD a a a 7 3 0 1:SITE CONTEXT Possible Points: 13 Case 1:Sites without farmland soils Y CONTEXT P1.1 Limit development on farmland Case 2:Sites with farmland soils-VSPZ Case 3:Sites with farmland soils-Mitigation Case 1:Sites without floodplain Y CONTEXT P1.2 Protect floodplain functions Case 2:Previously developed and brownfield sites within floodplain Case 3:Greenfield sites within floodplain Case 1:Sites without aquatic ecosystems Y CONTEXT P1.3 Conserve aquatic ecosystems Case 2:Sites with naturally occurring aquatic ecosystems Case 3:Sites with naturally occurring poor quality aquatic ecosystems Conserve habitats for threatened and Case 1:Brownfields and previously developed sites Y CONTEXT P1.4 endangered species Case 2:Greenfield sites Im Case 1:Previously developed sites 3 3 CONTEXT C1.5 Redevelop degraded sites 3 to 6 Case 2:Brownfield sites 6 4 CONTEXT C1.6 Locate projects within existing developed 4 4 areas Option 1:Pedestrian and bicycle network 2 3 CONTEXT C1.7 Connect to multi-modal transit networks 2 to 3 Option 2:Transit network 3 3 0 0 2:PRE-DESIGN ASSESSMENT+PLANNING Possible Points: 3 Y PRE-DESIGN P2.1 Use an integrative design process Y PRE-DESIGN P2.2 Conduct a pre-design site assessment Y PRE-DESIGN P2.3 Designate and communicate Vegetation and Soil Protection Zones 3 PRE-DESIGN C2.4 Engage users and stakeholders 3 3 0 12 11 3:SITE DESIGN-WATER Possible Points: 23 Y WATER P3.1 Manage precipitation on site Y WATER P3.2 Reduce water use for landscape irrigation 80th percentile precipitation event 4 6 WATER C3.3 Manage precipitation beyond baseline 90th percentile precipitation event 5 4 to 6 95th percentile precipitation event 6 Option 1:Reduce outdoor water use 4 6 WATER C3.4 Reduce outdoor water use Option 2:Significantly reduce outdoor water use 5 4 to 6 Option 3:Eliminate outdoor water use 6 Design functional stormwater features as 50%of stormwater features 4 5 WATER C3.5 4 to 5 amenities 100%of stormwater features 5 No aquatic ecosystems present on site 6 WATER C3.6 Restore aquatic ecosystems 30%of the geographic extent 4 (project must have existing feature) 60%of the geographic extent 5 4 to 6 Page 3 of 7 7/27/2022 ©Sustainable Sites Initiative'" Project Name: Project ID#: Date: SITES v2 Scorecard r Estimate points z below(key at a r bottom) , m PREREQUISITE OR z s YES 7 NO CREDIT# TITLE CASE/OPTION/THRESHOLD �a a a 90%of the geographic extent 6 0 1 34 6 1 4:SITE DESIGN-SOIL+VEGETATION Possible Points: 40 Y SOIL+VEG P4.1 Create and communicate a soil management plan Case 1:No invasive plants found on site Y SOIL+VEG P4.2 Control and manage invasive plants Case 2:Invasive plants identified on site Y SOIL+VEG P4.3 Use appropriate plants No healthy soils and/or appropriate vegetation present on site Conserve healthy soils and appropriate 50%of the site's existing vegetated area 4 6 SOIL+VEG C4.4 vegetation (project must have existing feature) 75%of the site's existing vegetated area 5 4 to 6 95%of the site's existing vegetated area 6 4 SOIL+VEG C4.5 Conserve special status vegetation 4 4 (project must have existing feature) 20%total native plant score 3 6 SOIL+VEG C4.6 Conserve and use native plants 40%total native plant score 4 3 to 6 60%total native plant score 6 20%total native plant community score 4 Conserve and restore native plant 6 SOIL+VEG C4.7 40%total native plant community score 5 4 to 6 communities 60%total native plant community score 6 minimal point score 1 low point score 3 6 SOIL+VEG C4.8 Optimize biomass 1 to 6 mid point score 5 high point score 6 4 SOIL+VEG C4.9 Reduce urban heat island effects 4 4 No buildings present on site Option 1:Reduce energy use-5%reduction 2 Option 1:Reduce energy use-7%reduction 4 Use vegetation to minimize building energy 4 SOIL+VEG C4.10 use Option 2:Provide shade structures-30%shaded 1 (project must have building on site) 1 to 4 Option 2:Provide shade structures-60%shaded 2 Option 3:Provide a windbreak-one row 1 Option 3:Provide a windbreak-two or more rows 2 4 SOIL+VEG C4.11 Reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire Project not in a fire-prone area (project must be located in fire-prone area) Project is in a fire-prone area 4 4 0 41 0 5:SITE DESIGN-MATERIALS SELECTION Possible Points: 41 Eliminate the use of wood from threatened Y MATERIALS P5.1 tree species No structures or paving present on site 4 MATERIALS C5.2 Maintain on-site structures and paving 10%of the total existing built surface area 2 (project must have existing feature) 20%of the total existing built surface area 3 2 to 4 30%of the total existing built surface area 4 Page 4 of 7 7/27/2022 ©Sustainable Sites Initiative— Project Name: Project ID#: Date: SITES v2 Scorecard r Estimate points z below(key at a r bottom) , m PREREQUISITE OR z " s YES 7 NO CREDIT If TITLE CASE/OPTION/THRESHOLD a a a 30%of total materials cast,excluding plants,rocks,and soils 3 4 MATERIALS C5.3 Design for adaptability and disassembly 3 to 4 60%of total materials cast,excluding plants,rocks,and soils 4 10%of total materials cast,excluding sails 3 4 MATERIALS C5.4 Use salvaged materials and plants 3 to 4 20%of total materials cost,excluding sails 4 20%of total materials cost,excluding plants and sails 3 4 MATERIALS C5.5 Use recycled content materials 3 to 4 40%of total materials cost,excluding plants and sails 4 30%of total materials cast 3 5 MATERIALS C5.6 Use regional materials 60%of total materials cast 4 3 to 5 90%of total materials cast 5 Option 1:Advocate for sustainable extraction of raw materials 1 Support responsible extraction of raw 5 MATERIALS C5.7 Option 2:Support suppliers that disclose environmental data 3 1 to 5 materials Option 3:Support suppliers that meet extraction standards 5 Option 1:Advocate for transparency and safer chemistry 1 5 MATERIALS C5.8 Support transparency and safer chemistry Option 2:Support manufacturers that disclose chemical data 3 1 to 5 Option 3:Support manufacturers with chemical hazard assessments 5 Option 1:Advocate for sustainable materials manufacturing 1 Support sustainability in materials 5 MATERIALS C5.9 Option 2:Support manufacturers that disclose data on sustainable practices 3 1 to 5 manufacturing Option 3:Support manufacturers that achieve sustainable practices 5 Option 1:Advocate for sustainable plant production 1 5 MATERIALS C5.10 Support sustainability in plant production Option 2:Support producers that disclose data on sustainable practices 3 1 to 5 Option 3:Support producers that achieve sustainable practices 5 2 1 23 4 6:SITE DESIGN-HUMAN HEALTH+WELL-BEING Possible Points: 30 No cultural or historic places present on site Protect and maintain cultural and historic 2 HHWB C6.1 places Option 1:Historic buildings,structures,or objects 2 (project must have existing feature) 2 to 3 Option 2:Historic or cultural landscapes 3 Provide optimum site accessibility,safety,and 2 HHWB C6.2 2 2 wayfinding 2 HHWB C6.3 Promote equitable site use 2 2 2 HHWB C6.4 Support mental restoration 2 2 2 HHWB C6.5 Support physical activity 2 2 2 HHWB C6.6 Support social connection 2 2 Option 1:Food production 3 0 4 HHWB C6.7 Provide on-site food production 3 to 4 Option 2:Food production and regular distribution 4 4 HHWB C6.8 Reduce light pollution 4 4 4 HHWB C6.9 Encourage fuel efficient and multi-modal 4 4 transportation Minimize exposure to environmental tobacco Option 1:Designate smoke-free zones 1 2 HHWBC6.10 lto2 smoke Option 2:Prohibit smoking on site 2 3 HHWB C6.11 Support local economy 3 3 Page 5 of 7 7/27/2022 ©Sustainable Sites Initiative'" Project Name: Project ID#: Date: SITES v2 Scorecard r Estimate points z below(key at a r bottom) , m PREREQUISITE OR z s YES ? NO CREDIT# TITLE CASE/OPTION/THRESHOLD a a a 0 17 0 7:CONSTRUCTION Possible Points: 17 Y CONSTRUCTION P7.1 Communicate and verify sustainable jconstruction practices Y CONSTRUCTION P7.2 Control and retain construction pollutants Y CONSTRUCTION P7.3 Restore soils disturbed during construction low paint score 3 5 CONSTRUCTION C7.4 Restore soils disturbed by previous mid point score 4 3 to 5 development high point score 5 Divert construction and demolition materials 50%of structural materials+95%of roads/infrastructure materials 3 4 CONSTRUCTION C7.5 3 to 4 from disposal 75%of structural materials+95%of roads/infrastructure materials 4 Divert reusable vegetation,rocks,and soil 100%of land-clearing materials retained for use within 50 miles 3 4 CONSTRUCTION C7.6 3 to 4 from disposal 100%of land-clearing materials retained on site 4 50%total run-time hours from Tier 2 or higher engines 2 4 CONSTRUCTION C7.7 Protect air quality during construction 50%total run-time hours from Tier 3 or higher engines 3 2 to 4 50%total run-time hours from Tier 4 or higher engines 4 0 22 0 8.OPERATIONS+MAINTENANCE Possible Points: 22 Y �j O+M P8.1 Plan for sustainable site maintenance Y O+M P8.2 Provide for storage and collection of recyclables 100%of vegetation trimmings recycled/composted off site within 50 miles 3 5 O+M C8.3 Recycle organic matter 100%of vegetation trimmings recycled/composted on site 4 3 to 5 100%of vegetation trimmings+food waste recycled/composted on site 5 Option 1:Plant health care plan 4 5 O+M C8.4 Minimize pesticide and fertilizer use 4 to 5 Option 2:Best management practices for plant health care 5 30%reduction from baseline energy use for outdoor equipment 2 4 O+M C8.5 Reduce outdoor energy consumption 60%reduction from baseline energy use for outdoor equipment 3 2 to 4 90%reduction from baseline energy use for outdoor equipment 4 Option 1:On-site-50%annual outdoor site electricity 3 Use renewable sources for landscape Option 1:On-site-100%annual outdoor site electricity 4 4 O+M C8.6 3 to 4 electricity needs Option 2:Green power-50%annual outdoor site electricity 3 Option 2:Green power-100%annual outdoor site electricity 4 Option 1:Scheduled maintenance 2 Protect air quality during landscape 4 O+M C8.7 Option 2:Low-emitting equipment 3 2 t0 4 maintenance Option 3:Manual or electric powered maintenance equipment 4 0 11 0 9.EDUCATION+PERFORMANCE MONITORING Possible Points: 11 Promote sustainability awareness and Option 1:Educational and interpretive elements 3 4 EDUCATION C9.1 3 to 4 education Option 2:Additional education 4 3 EDUCATION C9.2 Develop and communicate a case study 3 3 Page 6 of 7 7/27/2022 ©Sustainable Sites Initiative— Project Name: Project ID#: Date: SITES v2 Scorecard r Estimate points z below(key at a r bottom) , m PREREQUISITE OR z " s YES ? NO CREDIT# TITLE CASE/OPTION/THRESHOLD a a a 4 EDUCATION C9.3 Plan to monitor and report site performance ������������������ 4 4 0 9 0 10.INNOVATION OR EXEMPLARY PERFORMANCE Possible Bonus Points: 11110111 INNOVATION C10.1 Option 1:Exemplary performance 3 9 BONUS POINTS Innovation or exemplary performance 3 to 9 ( ) Option 2:Innovation outside the SITES v2 Rating System 3 YES ? NO 12 172 21 TOTAL ESTIMATED POINTS00 KEY SITES Certification levels Points YES Project confident points are achievable CERTIFIED 70 ? Project striving to achieve points,not 100%confident SILVER 85 NO Project is unable to achieve these credit points GOLD 100 PLATINUM 135 Page 7 of 7 7/27/2022 ©Sustainable Sites Initiative— Appendix B Ecological Assessment Glendale Regional Park Master Plan �i Glendale Regional Park Master Plan Ecological Assessment September 21, 2021 RiverRestoration conducted a site visit of the Glendale Regional Park on August 23,2021,to evaluate the current ecological conditions of the project area and to determine what features should be retained for ecological reasons.This inventory resulted in the identification of mature sycamore within the park,other mature trees along 1700 South,and river edge habitats that should be retained.Areas for potential enhancement were also identified and include all existing riparian forest and a buffer of 50-300'from the river.Areas closer to the river are likely to be closer to the groundwater,thus representing opportunities for riparian enhancement with less long-term need for irrigation. The irrigation system was tested and determined to be mostly out of commission and in need of replacement. The connection to service was identified in the northeast corner of the project area for future irrigation infrastructure. City staff will evaluate and install a temporary system to existing trees along the park strip on 1700 South.The sycamores and river edge trees are likely to be in contact with the shallow groundwater and it is recommended that a few shallow groundwater monitoring wells be installed when machinery is on site. The local and regional context was evaluated to determine if there are any adjacent City properties that would enhance the ecological functioning of this area and several local enhancement projects were identified. Additionally, students from Glendale Middle School have previously provided stewardship for areas just downstream of the project and Jordan River Park.The future stewardship of the natural areas in the vicinity of the project should involve local schools and community partners. The Jordan River upstream of the project was also observed to identify opportunities for a broader connection to the river both up and downstream.Development of on-water opportunities is one of the highest values of the site from a stewardship perspective.Locations up and downstream of the project were mapped and are provided as a KML file. Photos were taken of the site and noxious weeds were identified for treatment and control. City Natural Open Space staff committed to aggressive treatment of puncturevine across the site and stated they would deploy these resources in August. Plans for the trimming of vegetation and removal of garbage and debris stuck in the Russian olive along the river edge were also discussed and will be completed over the winter by City staff. 1 1 Page Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment RIVER 1234 South 900 East Salt Lake City, UT 84150 1970.947.9568 Current Ecological Conditions The current state of the riparian forest in and around the project area is in a degraded condition. Some of the existing large trees within the project area have a high value, since they are well established and seem to be healthy. The trees along the Jordan River are mostly pioneer invasive trees and shrubs,primarily Russian olives.While these trees are considered invasive,complete removal of these trees would adversely impact riparian birds in the area due to loss of habitat and cover. We propose that the Russian olives along the riverbank be retained until an irrigation system and native riparian forest can be planned and implemented.Any removal of trees should occur outside the nesting season for resident and migratory birds [preferably September through February]. Map 1 shows areas of existing riparian tress that could be retained. Only the sycamore trees should be considered to absolutely protect in place, since they are mature,well-established,and healthy.The remaining groves of trees can be evaluated on a case-by-case basis for phased removal or replacement with planted and irrigated multi-layer riparian areas. The demo of existing infrastructure provides opportunity to repurpose the low-lying areas with riparian vegetation,improving the riparian buffer and enhancing ecological education opportunities.We propose that the old wave pool(east side of the project) be repurposed into a wedand/riparian zone. Further opportunities exist to connect the east of the wave pool to the current boat launch/take out with native plant species and interactive and educational signs. The existing trees along the park strip at the north of the project area should be preserved,with the irrigation system re-established to maintain this important buffer from 1700 south. Map 1. Local ecological areas of importance. 2 Page Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment RIVER 1234 South 900 East Salt Lake City, UT 84150 1970.947.9568 Local and Regional Connections The Glendale Regional Park is in a central part of Salt Lake City but is also centrally located along the riparian corridor of the Jordan River,which provides a key connection of riparian habitats for resident and migratory birds. The site is located along the flyway between Utah Lake and Great Salt Lake and provides a potential stopover location for resting migratory birds.There is also potential for increased areas of higher quality riparian habitat with a multi-canopy layer structure. Robust riparian habitats consist of canopy's that could have several layers of complexity including large trees, small trees and shrubs,grasses,and forbs [flowers].This multi-layer structure is beneficial for creating a diverse ecosystem that will be more resilient to future changes in climate and ecosystem processes. Surrounding regional areas that are owned by SLC adjacent to the golf course and in other open areas offer great opportunity to be enhanced for riparian functioning and flood capacity. �. �. -M�i:� • r 4s I u�JF, 1 i N'JI Yr.Y. � 1� ,���w. - Y �• .Y' � r S��r�r- , 1 t � `Sr-r f c t a`•, �311d �i l l��•t � 1pr�l��{ "a Map 2. Regional ecologically important areas 3 Page Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment RIVER 1234 South 900 East Salt Lake City, UT 84150 1970.947.9568 Site Preparation We recommend that treatments are conducted on invasive species in preparation for future disturbances.The main focal species for control include puncturevine and Russian olive. Use the proper herbicide to control puncturevine across the hillside.Much of the puncturevine is located up on the hill with the slides.Treatments should occur 2-3 times a year, starting in August 2021 [stated verbally on site with meeting],follow up treatments should be conducted starting in June/July 2022,depending on the weather and phenology of the plants. An initial trimming of the Russian olive along the river should be conducted from a boat in fall 2021 to free up garbage and debris that have become stuck in the low-hanging branches.A floating oil boom or turbidity curtain can be installed across the river at the existing boat ramp to gather and remove floating garbage and debris. Potential Access Areas River access can be developed by creating easier entry for canoes and kayaks.The water quality is an issue,so swimming should be discouraged,but as the water quality may be better in the future,water access should not be completely cut off.Additional small boat access locations should be evaluated to create a more local scale river recreation circulation pattern.The figures below provide some ideas for river access that does not encourage swimming. Figure 1. Jordan River access steps at Big Bend Habitat in West Jordan, UT 4 Page Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment �� IVER 1R234 South 900 East Salt Lake City, UT 84150 1970.947.9568 - Figure 2. Jordan River Big Bend Habitat canoe access in West Jordan, UT WNW T �X y � ` •tam,,, - �: � a. t s�e�'sc�''. _:�. � �.—�ice.•.;,-'� '�` N Figure 3. Price River in Helper, UT river access beach 5 Page Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment RIVER 1234 South 900 East Salt Lake City, UT 84150 1970.947.9568 z 1 t� Figure 4. Price River access steps in Helper, UT v _ IN,. b Ry ft - MI� " Figure S. Ogden River ADA fishing access pier in Ogden, UT 6 Page Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment RFSI'ORATION.ORG • 9 11 East Salt Lake City, UT 84150 1970.947.9568 Figure 6 Ogden River ADA acca5s ramp in Ogden, UT Figure 6 sue, x ! � „• *,� � Tl /Y� K f - •.3?'� Tyr�'!• �. _r- A .� ' �._b�, '� .� �._• � It � ���.- River overlookPacific Page Glendale Regional Park—Ecological RIVER 1234 South 900 East Salt Lake City, UT 84150 1970.947.9568 IF 4. .�-iY°a'y yyw �f - w"SJ`iii'r•��yYu.�'��, �� a. Figure 7. Colorado River overlook in Glendale Springs,CO Conclusion The main conclusions of the site visit provide direction for the near-term management of invasive species on the site in preparation for future disturbance of the project site for development of the regional park. Managing invasive species on the site for 2-3 years before the site disturbance will reduce the number and pervasiveness of invasive species and will also begin to develop a human presence in the area doing maintenance,thus reducing the perception of the area as abandoned. The Glendale Regional Park offers great opportunity to improve and expand the ecological function of the riparian habitat along the Jordan River.Mature vegetation should be protected,irrigation throughout the site reinitiated,and a process to phase out nonnative trees should be implemented in conjunction with planting native riparian plants. The central location of the project site offers great opportunity to connect with the surrounding environment, provide the community areas to recreate in nature, and provide high quality habitat for resident and migratory birds. 8 1 Page Glendale Regional Park—Ecological Assessment Appendix C Restortatmion Plan Glendale Regional Park Master Plan 2022 Glendale Regional Park Restoration Noxious Weed Management a n Developed as part of the Jordan River Commission Best Practices for Riverfront Communities Primary Focus Area Glendale Regional Park Project PURPOSE: This document was created to provide guidance for an Adaptive Management Strategy to control noxious and invasive plant species at the Glendale Regional Park Project in Salt Lake City, Utah. This document represents a template that can be used on other sites along the Jordan River in Salt Lake City, where site specific data on noxious weed locations can be used to develop site specific action plans. Overall, our goal is to improve the management of these lands for the benefit of people and wildlife by reducing the cover of noxious and invasive plants and increasing the cover of native and desirable plants. The following recommendations may need to be changed based upon site specific needs and resources that are available. Any and all use of herbicides must be done by licensed applicators and those applicators must read, understand, and follow label requirements for the use of herbicides. Weed Control Instructions and Best Practices: 1. Always use the proper methods to deal with the plant species on your project; 2. Always read the label for any herbicides that will be used and follow specific requirements; 3. Be familiar with the target species, control methods, and appropriate follow up methods to ensure success; 4. Take proper precautions in protecting your personal health and safety and the health of the environment; 5. Ensure weather conditions are appropriate for the use of any herbicides; 6. Post signs were appropriate to alert the public about the use of any herbicides; 7. Collect as much information as possible on treatment areas such as: location of treatments, timing of treatments, follow up actions required to ensure success; 8. AND only use herbicides where you have obtained express consent from the land owner to conduct treatments. HOW TO - Five Step Approach: Prevention • Prioritize invasive species control where recent or future land disturbance is anticipated • Identify pathways or "vectors" of invasive species introduction and spread and try to understand the potential impact of those species on native ecosystems • Work with surrounding land owners to reduce spread from surrounding properties Early detection and rapid response • Use this guidance document to improve detection and identification of invasive plant species • Document occurrence of new species not included in this plan yearly using EDDMaps • Coordinate response efforts to eradicate species before establishment and spread with all stakeholders working within and adjacent to the Big Bend Control and management • Follow both short- and long-term recommendations in this Big Bend Restoration Plan to restore and enhance native and desirable plants that will withstand future changes in weather and climate • Limit spread of existing infestations by targeted eradication or population suppression (using mechanical, biological, and chemical methods) • Implement a variety of methods to improve the outcomes of treatments (i.e. Integrated Pest Management Approach) • Work with surrounding land owners to control surrounding invasive species populations Revegetation • Select site adapted species of plants that can compete against invasive weeds once established • Develop site specific plans for installation of "habitat patches" of riparian plants based upon local soils and access to surface and groundwater • Seed any disturbed areas soon after disturbance has ceased and make sure to properly prepare soils for seeding • Follow up on any revegetation actions for at least five years to ensure establishment of new plants Monitoring • Monitor before and after control methods to ensure progress is being made on controlling existing infestations and new infestations are not becoming established Site Specific Indications for the Glendale Regional Park Based upon site assessments completed in the late summer of 2021 and spring of 2022, it appears that there are only a few areas that need aggressive weed control for hoary cress, Scotch thistle, and puncturevine. The treatments that occurred in 2021 appear to have been effective at reducing the cover and seed production of the puncturevine on the big hill. Additional work was done along the riverbanks to reduce the cover of Russian olives. Treatments proposed for summer and fall of 2022 include follow up on the work completed in 2021 and aggressive treatment of secondary invasion of hoary cress and phragmites in areas along the riverbanks where Russian olive was cut down. The remaining material left from the Russian olive cutting should be retained on site to protect any new plants from wind and sun. The branches remaining can be piled into small windrows and hoary cress and phragmites should be treated as soon as possible. Areas identified for future riparian forests should be planted with container plants with drip irrigation this fall (November 2022). Areas where Russian olive was removed should be the top priority for restoration of riparian forests to return the multi-layer canopy for nesting and migratory birds, while considering issues with transient camps in the area. Aggressive chemical control of noxious weeds adjacent to all disturbance areas should also be a high priority. These are the most likely places for spread of noxious and invasive plants. These areas should also be seeded soon after the disturbance ceases (generally within 2 weeks any time of the year). Seeding with an inexpensive grass and forb mix should be done any time disturbances occur throughout the project lifecycle to reduce the opportunity for noxious and invasive plants to take over and dominate. This is cheap insurance and will reduce the potential need for chemicals to be used on the site in the future. Habitat improvements are a key goal of the Project and phasing the project's construction will reduce potential impacts to the site's current wildlife population. Phasing the project will limit the amount of area that will be disturbed at any one time. Portions of the site will be left undisturbed during the initial phases of construction to provide habitat. This applies particularly to habitat for migratory song birds. Partners working along the Jordan River Corridor have recommended a phased approach for removal of Russian olives, which serve as habitat for migratory and resident bird species. Russian olive should be left on portions of the site that are not part of the initial phases and riparian plants should be planted into Russian olive stands, where the shade from the existing invasive trees will help with establishment of new forests. As native plants mature, the remainder of the Russian olives can be removed and replaced with the appropriate native species. There will be an ongoing need for maintenance of the site to prevent Russian olives (and other noxious species) from re-establishing in areas where they have been removed. Secondary invasion of hoary cress and phragmites should also be monitored and treated in these areas. The following noxious and invasive weed species have been observed on or adjacent to the Glendale Regional Park: • Hoary cress • Perennial pepperweed • Scotch thistle • Dalmatian toadflax • Poison hemlock • Common reed • Houndstongue • Tamarisk • Russian olive • Russian knapweed • Dyer's woad • Puncturevine The primary objective of noxious weed control is to selectively reduce the cover and abundance of noxious and invasive plants across the site. This work is being accomplished mostly by mechanical and chemical control of herbaceous plants and through physical removal of invasive Russian olive and tamarisk trees. Site management should focus on phasing the removal of these trees over several years and installation of native and desirable plant species to retain the beneficial aspects of the riparian cover, i.e. a multi-story canopy. The main objective of this Plan is to reduce the cover of invasive species over time so that the entire site does not have to be treated at the time of major construction. Removal of invasive trees can be conducted at the same time as crews and volunteers are installing native riparian trees, shrubs, forbs, and grasses in small patches.The installation of new plants will reduce the "temporal loss" of riparian habitat in the area during major construction activity phases. The major challenge with this phase is providing sufficient water to the plants to make sure they become established. Another objective of this Plan is to reduce the number of seeds and propagules of noxious plants such as thistle, whitetop, Russian olive, and puncturevine. The following matrix provides some guidance for treatments and timing for each noxious and invasive weed species found on the Glendale Regional Park or along the Jordan River corridor close to the site. Glendale Regional Park Action Plan Summa 2022-2023 2022 2023 d fTC d 3 C N p OZ M phi tTD 3 .6 p�'j C c M p o 0 Status Responsibility c .< _ no 40 < 0 Q .< _ 'o ,. < 0 rm etation Monitor weedy upland areas X X X X Monitor riparian areas X X X X Count planting success X X Management Water Initial watering of plants X X X X X Irrigation of plants X X X X X X X Vegetation Fencing and Protecting installed vegetation X X X X X Installation of Habitat Patches X X X X X Seeding of areas adjacent to disturbances X X X X X X X X X X Mow annual weeds and thistles X X X X X X X X X X Field meeting with herbicide applicator X X X X X Herbicide use in upland areas X X X X X X X X Herbicide use in riparian areas X X X X X X X X Chemical control hoary cress X X X X X X Chemical control poison hemlock X X X X X X Chemical control thistle X X X X X X X X Chemical control phragmites X X X X Chemical control perennial pepperweed X I X Wildlife No removal of trees to protect nesting birds X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Herbivory check on any planted vegetation X X X X X X Restoration Plants The following species have been selected for seeding or planting in small patches. These species were derived from observations of native riparian habitats by Ty Harrison over the last half- century. Irrigation is needed regularly for successful establishment of these plants. Common Name I Scientific Name RIPARIAN TREES AND SHRUBS Fremont Cottonwood Populus fremontii Box Elder Acre negundo Peachleaf Willow Salilx amigdaloides Black Hawthorn Crataegus douglasi Coyote Willow Salix exigua Woods Rose Rosa woodsii Oakleaf Sumac Rhus aromatics var. trilobata Golden Currant Ribes aureum UPLAND SHRUBS Big Sagebrush Artemisia tridentate var. tridentata Rubber Rabbitbrush Chrysothamnus nauseosus Greasewood Sarcobatus vermiculatus Fourwing Saltbush Atriplex canescens Gardner's Saltbush Atriplex gardneri Recommended Seed Mixes Species Scientific Name Species Common Name Percent desired cover at maturity Emergent Wetland Mix Typha latifolia Common cattail 40 Scirpus acutis Hardstem or Roundstem bullrush 40 S. americanus American threesquare 10 S. pungens Common threesquare 10 S. maritimus Alkali bullrush 5 Senecio hydrophilus lWater groundsel 2 Triglochin sp jArrowgrass 2 Wet Meadow Eleocharis palustris Creeping spikerush 20 Juncus torreyi Torrey rush 20 Carex nebrascensis Nebraska sedge 20 C. lanuginosa Wooly sedge 20 Distichlis spicata Inland saltgrass 10 Mesic Meadow Juncus arcticus Wiregrass or Arctic rush 30 Distichlis spicata Inland saltgrass 10 Pascopyrum smithii Western wheatgrass 30 Sporobolus airoides Alkali saccaton 10 Puccinellia nuttalliana Nuttall's alkaligrass 10 C. praegracilis Black creeper sedge 10 Solidago occidentalis Western goldenrod 10 Upland Mix Pascopyrum smithii Western wheatgrass 30 Leymus cinereus Great Basin wildrye 20 Distichlis spicata Inland saltgrass 10 Poa secunda (sandbergii) Sandberg bluegrass 10 Festuca ovina `Covar' Sheep fescue 10 Cleome serrulata Rocky Mountain beeweed 5 Sphaeralcea coccinea Scarlet globemallow 5 Linium lewisii Lewis blue flax 5 Weed treatment tracking form: OBSERVER LOCATION DATE TREATMENT FOLLOW UP NEEDED WEATHER ACRES DENSITY PHENOLOGY NOTES Appendix D Market Study =Glendale 0 Regional Park 0%0 Master Plan Glendale Regional Park Demographic and Market Study September, 2021 This study assesses and analyzes demographic characteristics of the areas surrounding the Glendale Regional Park project site.As part of the process, primary and secondary market areas were defined and confirmed with project stakeholders.These market areas served as the geographic focus area of the analysis and were compared to demographic trends at the County level. Key questions answered through the analysis include: • What is the primary and secondary market area that the Park could expect to draw visitor from? • What are the demographic and populations trends within the primary and secondary market areas? • What is the population that the Park could be serving? • What does recreational trends data inform regarding potential gaps or opportunities? Primary and Secondary Market Area Primary Market Area The primary market area, depicted in Figure 1, is where 60 to 80 percent of all park users are anticipated to be drawn from and includes users who will frequent the Park on a near weekly basis. The primary market area identified for this analysis lies between Interstate 215 and Interstate 15 and extends south of West South Temple Street and north of West 2900 Street. Neighborhoods that fall in the primary market area include Chesterfield, Western Pacific Addition, Redwood Gardens, Klenkes Addition, Wenco Acres,Albert Place, Whaldons Addition, Poplar Grove and Wright Circle. Other parks and public outdoor spaces located in the primary market area include Decker Lake Park, Redwood Nature Area, Redwood Trailhead Park, 17th South River Park, Weseman Park, Modesto Park, 9th South River Park, Post Street Tot Lot, Bend-In-The-River, Jordan Park and Peace Gardens, Jordan River Parkway, Poplar Grove Park and Sherwood Park. w loos , r 9 IW DON ,� W 600 N a. E 11th A— a ESouth Tangle sf `. Salt W40 ` Lake City E400s =w 5006 - _ =-t sod - ..-.i.. E 6005 � �I _ - WInAina s,ye V1 E 90051 E III S, E Sun4,IaA c - Ca10.11 is Ave m V, 'UoS v E 1300S V11i COS -LL_ - ^ E1700S 'Z '-"1:n 2100Sou1h Fry-- I s E 2100S H South Salt L. L X -- -Lake-- R E ncs lei .. W-3300 0 11�1f y i- - West 4 Valley ! _ city 40OU S - E 3900S m m Ve 41 n0 S Figure 1: Primary Market Area.Source:ESRI Business Analyst Secondary Market Area The secondary market area, illustrated in Figure 2, is where 20 to 40 percent of all park users are anticipated to be drawn from and includes users who treat the Park as a destination, going there for a specific purpose or activities. Salt Lake City was identified as the secondary market area and was analyzed as a buffer zone to encompass a broader reach of the region and capture residents who may visit the Park less frequently than those in the primary market area. The area north of 2100 South Freeway within the primary market area lies within the Salt Lake City boundary.As a result, data extracted for the secondary market area also includes data within the section of the primary market area north of 2100 South Freeway. The primary and secondary markets were compared to Salt Lake County to better understand the relative demographic differences of the market area in the context of the region. Lake >>r H '11+ Pi 5UU v - -- = 9 - Sait w 70o s; 'w too W'4 ». Lake-"aos f GCity _ - E 1300 S - ffffff�lY r n w 1700 E 17 .1'. SaR.�I E 2700S . Laket Magna E3300S West Valley a s000s !-1 city : Figure 2:Secondary Market Area.Source ESRI Business Analyst Population and Households Table 1 shows the total population estimates for each area of study in 2010, 2021, and 2026 extracted from ESRI Business Analyst.The 2021 total population in the primary market area is 29,525 and the population in the secondary market area is 204,380. Between 2010 and 2021, the population within the primary market area has grown by 4.07 percent while the population in the secondary market area grew by 9.65 percent. Growth within both primary and secondary market areas was less than that of the County,which grew by 17.3 percent since 2010. Over the next five years(2021-2026)population in the primary market area is expected to grow by 3.54 percent, reaching a total population of 30,571 in 2026. The population in the secondary market area is expected to see slightly higher growth over the next five years, growing by 8.65 percent to reach a total population of 222,029 in 2026. Population Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT 2010 Total Population 28,369 186,399 1,029,655 2021 Total Population 29,525 204,380 1,207,807 2026 Total Population 30,571 222,029 1,298,444 Table 1.Total Population Estimates.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Total household estimates, household size, and family statistics are depicted in Table 2. Between 2010 and 2021 households in the primary market area have grown by 3.7 percent, increasing from 7,982 to 8,277.The growth in households in the primary market area is less than that of the secondary market area (11.68 percent)and that of Salt Lake County(17.1 percent). Household growth between 2021 and 2026 is expected to slow to 3.2 percent in the primary market area, 9.51 percent in the secondary market area and 7.5 percent in Salt Lake County. In 2026 there is projected to be 8,542 total households in the primary market area and 91,106 households in the secondary market area. Current average household size in the primary market area (3.54 persons) is larger than that in the secondary market area(2.4 persons)and that of Salt Lake County(2.97 persons).This is consistent with a higher number of family household within the primary market area (70.63 percent)than in both the secondary market area(49.47 percent)and Page 2 in Salt Lake County(69.66 percent). Of the families within each area of study, average family sizes are larger in the primary market area (4.1 persons)than the secondary market area (3.27 persons)and Salt Lake County(3.55 persons). The primary market area's high concentration of families has several implications the future of Glendale Regional Park, including ensuring that park programming, both physical and event, is appropriate for children of varying ages. Households&Families Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT Total Households 2010 Total Households 7,982 74,493 342,622 2021 Total Households 8,277 83,197 401,195 2026 Total Households 8,542 91,106 431,279 Household Size 2021 Average Household Size 3.54 2.40 2.97 Families 2021 Total Family Households 5,846 41,157 279,462 2021 Total Family Households(%) 70.63% 49.47% 69.66% 2021 Average Family Size 4.10 3.27 3.55 Table 2.Household and Family Estimates.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Age The 2021 median age and the distribution of ages for the primary market area, secondar market area, and Salt Lake County is depicted in Table 3. The median age in the primary market area is 29, slightly younger than that of the secondary market area(33)and that of Salt Lake County(33). Median ages in 2026 are expected to be roughly the same as 2021 across all areas of study. The primary market area is significantly younger than the secondary market area and Salt Lake County, with residents 19 and under comprising 36.52 percent of the population. The proportion of the total population that is under 19 in the secondary market area is 21.77 percent,which is lower than the primary market area and Salt Lake County(27.85 percent).The largest age group in the primary market area is between 0 and 9, which consists of 19.78 percent of the total population,followed by age groups between 10 and 19 and between 30 and 39,which consist of 16.74 percent and 16.33 percent of the population, respectively. The high ratio of children in the primary market area indicates a high concentration of families in the region.The largest age cohort in the secondary market area is between 20 and 29, indicating that there is an overall younger demographic in this region that may enter family formation years (30-39)within the next decade. Total Population Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT 0-9 19.78% 12.93% 16.17% 10-19 16.74% 11.91% 14.40% 20-29 15.29% 19.05% 14.45% 30-39 16.33% 17.60% 16.72% 40-49 11.40% 11.63% 12.47% 50-59 8.81% 9.80% 9.72% 60-69 6.44% 8.84% 8.60% 70-79 3.54% 5.25% 4.99% 80+ 1.67% 2.99% 2.46% Median Age 28.9 1 33.1 32.9 Table 3.Population by Age Group.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Household Income and Wealth The 2021 median household income, projected median household income growth, and concentration of specific household income brackets are shown in Table 4.The 2021 median household income in the primary market area is $50,508,which is less than that of the secondary market area($63,364)and that of Salt Lake County($80,897). The primary market area is also expected to see less growth in median household income(12.18 percent)than in the secondary market area(19.14 percent)and Salt Lake County(13.59 percent) between 2021 and 2026. Table 5 delineates the median disposable income and the percent of the total households in each area of study corresponding to specific disposable income ranges as of 2021. The median disposable income in the primary market area is Page 3 $42,262,which less than that of the secondary market area ($52,690)and that of Salt Lake County($63,344). Income distributions for both median and disposable income levels are skewed towards lower income levels in the primary market area while those in the secondary market area and Salt Lake County form a more normal distribution around the median income level.This indicates that income levels are lower in the primary market area than the secondary market area or the county. Given this distinction, the Park will better suit the primary market through low or no cost activities for both adults and children. There is a need for the implementation of programming such as free fitness classes or facilities that can supplement recreational demands of the community for little to no cost. If concessions are implemented, then they should be priced appropriately. 2021 Household Income Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT Median Household Income $50,508 $63,364 $80,897 2021 to 2026 Median Household Income Growth 12.18% 19.14% 13.59% $200,000 or greater 1.98% 8.43% 8.49% $150,000-$199,999 3.25% 6.88% 10.09% $100,000-$149,999 9.70% 15.94% 20.91% $75,000-$99,999 15.05% 12,51% 14.92% $50,000-$74,999 20.67% 16.50% 17.58% $35,000-$49,999 15.43% 11.11% 9.96% $25,000-$34,999 1 11.33% 1 8.39% 1 6.17% $15,000-$24,999 11.31% 7.94% 5.40% Less than$15,000 11.27% 12.29% 6.49% Table 4.Household Income Concentrations.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. 2021 Disposable Income Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT Median Disposable Income $42,262 $52,690 $63,344 $200,000 or greater 0.85% 3.76% 3.73% $150,000-$199,999 1.15% 4.58% 4.75% $100,000-$149,999 7.20% 13.30% 18.24% $75,000-$99,999 8.13% 11.51% 15.04% $50,000-$74,999 24.80% 20.00% 22.57% $35,000-$49,999 18.46% 14.23% 14.04% $25,000-$34,999 12.50% 9.10% 7.37% $15,000-$24,999 13.64% 9.88% 6.82% Less than$15,000 13.27% 13.64% 7.44% Table 5.Disposable Income Concentrations.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Depicted in Table 5 is the Wealth Index for the primary market area, secondary market area, and Salt Lake County. The Wealth Index is a metric used to compare overall wealth of communities to the national level. Esri Business Analyst measures wealth by compiling a variety of metrics that contribute to affluence, including income, average net worth, and material possessions and resources.The index compares the wealth calculated for selected areas to the average national wealth levels.Wealth indexes above 100 indicate wealth levels above the national average,while those below 100 indicate wealth levels below the national average. The wealth index in the primary market area is 47, indicating that the area has lower amounts of wealth when compared to the national average. The secondary market area has a wealth index of 85, which is slightly lower than the national average,while Salt Lake County has a wealth index of 105,which is higher than the national average. This indicates that in terms of income and personal assets, the primary market area holds the lowest level of wealth out of the three areas studied. Given the low wealth index of the primary market area, it is likely that the majority of the population in this region do not have adequate resources to pay for, or use, the same recreational facilities as those of a higher wealth index community. For this reason, programs should not be priced at a level suitable to the other areas of study, instead low cost or free programs should be offered so that those with lower incomes have access to desired recreational facilities and programs. Wealth Index Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT 2021 Wealth Index 47 85 105 Table 5.Wealth Index.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Page 4 Housing Table 6 illustrates the composition of housing units that are either renter or owner occupied as of 2021.Currently there are 8,277 occupied housing units in the primary market area, of which 4,560(55.09 percent)are owner occupied and 3,717 (44.91 percent)are renter occupied. Compared to the primary market area,there is a higher concentration of renter occupied units in the secondary market area (54.08 percent)and a smaller concentration of renter occupied units in Salt Lake County(33.78 percent). Table 7 depicts the concentration of housing type and number of units in the housing structure within each area of study as of 2019. The majority of housing units in all areas of study are single unit detached structures. Unlike the that of the primary market area and Salt Lake County, the second largest concentration of housing types, making up 14.05 percent of total housing in the secondary market area, consists of buildings that hold 50 or more units. Tenure 2021 Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT Total Occupied 8,277 83,197 401,195 Owner Occupied Housing Units 4,560 38,203 265,687 Renter Occupied Housing Units 3,717 44,994 135,508 2021 Owner Occupied Housing Units(%) 55.09% 45.92% 66.22% 2021 Renter Occupied Housing Units(%) 44.91% 54.08% 33.78% Table 6.Tenure of occupied housing.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. 2019 Housing Type(Percent) Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT 1 Detached Unit in Structure 60.42% 46.42% 62.62% 1 Attached Unit in Structure 5.55% 3.24% 7.19% 2 Units in Structure 7.16% 6.57% 2.94% 3 or Units in Structure 5.19% 6.62% 3.91% 5 to 9 Units in Structure 4.35% 5.06% 4.23% 10 to 19 Units in Structure 8.10% 6.90% 5.81% 20 to 49 Units in Structure 4.01% 9.91% 5.31% 50 or More Units in Structure 1.59% 14.05% 5.99% Housing:Mobile Homes 3.63% 0.95% 1.94% Housing:Boat/RVA/an/etc. 0.00% 0.28% 0.07% Table 7.Tenure of occupied housing.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Table 8 delineates the proportion of all housing units as of 2019 by year built.The median year built of housing units within the primary market area is 1968,which is newer than the median home age in the secondary market and older than that of Salt Lake County. The majority of housing units in the primary market(16.89 percent)were built between 1950 and 1959 while the majority of the households within the secondary market(29.08 percent)were built in 1939 or earlier. Salt Lake County holds a higher concentration of buildings built in 1970 or later. Housing Unit Development Year Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT Median Year Structure was Built 1968 1959 1981 2014 or Later 0.31% 2.98% 4.47% 2010-2013 0.41% 2.30% 4.24% 2000-2009 10.93% 6.65% 14.92% 1990-1999 12.57% 7.36% 15.20% 1980-1989 10.39% 7.69% 12.95% 1970-1979 13.04% 12.06% 18.90% 1960-1969 12.96% 9.97% 8.88% 1950-1959 16.89% 13.22% 8.88% 1940-1949 8.15% 8.70% 3.55% 1939 or Earlier 14.36% 29.08% 8.01% Table 8.Tenure of occupied housing.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Illustrated in Table 9, the median contract rent in the primary market area is$900, which is greater than that of the secondary market area($889), and less than that of Salt Lake County($993). Monthly ownership costs as of 2019 for households that pay a mortgage are depicted in Table 10. Of the households with a mortgage, most ownership costs typically lie within 10 to 30 percent of household income. Ownership costs that exceed 50 percent of household income within the primary market area consist of 8.38 percent of total households with a mortgage, which is greater than that Page 5 of the secondary market area (5.56 percent)and that of Salt Lake County(5.75 percent). This indicates that the primary market area is faced with higher housing cost burdens than other areas. Glendale Park can assist households in the primary market area by offering low cost or free programming, thereby eliminating, or reducing recreation related expenses. Contract Rent Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT 2019 Median Contract Rent $900 $889 $993 Table 9.Median Contract Rent.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. 2019 Monthly Ownership Costs of Households with a Mortgage(Percent) Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT MonthlyOwner Costs<10%of HH Income 4.89% 6.34% 5.32% MonthlyOwner Costs 10-14.9%ofHHIncome 11.40% 12.61% 12.69% MonthlyOwner Costs 15-19.9%ofHHIncome 11.51% 14.57% 16.18% MonthlyOwner Costs 20-24.9%of HH Income 11.81% 11.54% 12.39% MonthlyOwner Costs 25-29.9%of HH Income 9.42% 6.56% 8.49% MonthlyOwner Costs 30-34.9%ofHHIncome 4.48% 4.27% 4.87% MonthlyOwner Costs 35-39.9%of HH Income 6.11% 3.92% 3.34% MonthlyOwner Costs 40-49.9%of HH Income 2.68% 3.12% 3.47% MonthlyOwner Costs 50+%ofHHIncome 8.38% 5.56% 5.75% MonthlyOwner Costs%of HH Inc Not Computed 0.00% 0.15% 0.20% Table 10.Housing Costs for Households Owning Property.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Table 11 displays the 2021 and 2026 median home values for the areas studied. The 2021 median home value in the primary market area is$282,245,which is 34 percent less than that of the secondary market area and 30.6 percent less than that of Salt Lake County. Median home values are expected to grow by 53 percent in the primary market area, 30 percent in the secondary market area and 25 percent in Salt Lake County. Median Home Values Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT 2021 Median Home Value $282,245 $427,693 $406,810 2026 Median Home Value $431,591 $554,870 $509,442 Table 11.Median Home Values.Source:ESRI Business Analyst. Race&Ethnicity The distribution of race and ethnicity within the selected areas of study are delineated in Table 12. The highest concentration of race within the primary market area is white, consisting of 48.2 percent of the population.The Hispanic population makes up 53.44 percent of the primary market area population, 24.3 percent of the secondary market area population and 18.36 percent of the Salt Lake County population. Race(2021) Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT White Population 48.20% 70.58% 78.16% Black/African American Population 4.64% 3.67% 2.06% American Indian/Alaska Native Population 1.86% 1.35% 0.93% Asian Population 4.92% 6.05% 4.51% Pacific Islander Population 6.34% 2.14% 1.61% Other Race Population 28.45% 11.86% 8.97% Population of Two or More Races 5.59% 4.36% 3.76% Ethnicity(2021) Hispanic Population 53.44% 24.30% 18.36% Non-Hispanic Population 46.56% 75.70% 81.64% Table 12.Race Concentrations.Source:ESRI Business Analyst.Hispanic and White population numbers are not mutually exclusive. Spending Habits Entertainment and recreational spending in 2021 is depicted in Table 13. Spending per household on entertainment and recreation is approximately$2,084,which is 33.57 percent less than that of the secondary market area ($3,137) and 40.34 percent less than that of Salt Lake County($3,493).The primary market area spends 39.65 percent less on membership fees for social, recreational and health clubs than the secondary market area and 46.57 percent less on Page 6 those services than Salt Lake County. Given the lower spending habits of individuals within the primary market area on entertainment and recreation,there is an implied lower willingness to pay for this category of products and services.As a result,facilities and programs within the Glendale Regional Park will likely see higher use if programming prices are reduced or eliminated. Household Expenditures(2021) Primary Market Area Secondary Market Area Salt Lake County,UT Entertainment/Recreation $2,084 $3,137 $3,493 Fees for Participant Sports Excluding Trips $72 $111 $134 Fees for Recreational Lessons $87 $131 $160 Sports/Rec/Exercise Equipment $127 $182 $202 Membership Fees for Social/Recreation/Health Clubs $148 1 $246 1 $278 Table 13.Household Expenditures.Source:ESRI Business Analyst.Per household spending data was calculated from dividing aggregate spending values by the total number of households. Conclusion With a population of 29,525 in the primary market area and 204,380 in the secondary market area, Glendale Regional Park services an urban community which requires outdoor space and recreational opportunities for all residents.The population in the surrounding region is also growing at a rapid rate,which furthers the need for additional park and recreation opportunities. Many of the households within the primary market are families with an average family size that is greater than the surrounding regions. Due to the large family demographic, there is likely a desire for safe public spaces with a variety of programs that can accommodate both the demands of children and adults.As 19.78 percent of the population in the primary market area is children,facilities in the park should tailor to the types of activities that youth desire. Since both the median household income and median disposable income within the primary market area is lower than that of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County,the primary market may be less capable of spending on recreation as other areas of higher affluence. Housing costs also present a larger financial burden for the primary market than other areas of study. For this reason, recreational programs in the park should be offered free of charge or at low-or no-cost rates to accommodate the primary market's population, and to provide outdoor opportunities for those that may not have access to those opportunities elsewhere. Page 7 EXHIBIT D Public Comments Received&Letters of Support ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor o L9 srn= =Arj Public Comments, meeting minutes and responses can be found in the Planning Commission Staff Report of November 9, 2022 and in the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of November 9, 2022. Please see below for relevant letters of support, which have also been sent directly to the Planning Commission and City Council. PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT www.slc.gov/parks/ 1965 W 500 S PHONE 801-972-7800 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104 FAX 801-972-7847 November 4, 2022 Mayor Erin Mendenhall Salt Lake City Council 451 S. State Street Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SUBJECT: PNUT Letter of Support for the Glendale Regional Park Master Plan Mayor Erin Mendenhall and City Council Members, Please allow this letter to serve as a resounding endorsement for the adoption of the Glendale Regional Park Master Plan.As population growth along the Wasatch Front continues to accelerate, the importance of equitable investment in quality, community-integrated public spaces like this is vital to quality of life for all community members. We applaud the successful community engagement efforts and the proactive adjustments based on that engagement. Key master plan elements we strongly support include creating community gathering and event spaces, providing play places for all abilities users, creating places to enjoy water within the park and in the Jordan River, and developing places to engage in active movement supported by the landscape. The adoption and implementation of this plan will benefit the community by: • Providing an iconic neighborhood park that celebrates and preserves community, culture, and diversity. It will also be a regional destination connecting to the Jordan River and Salt Lake City's park network. • Prioritizing accessible nature and recreation will improve quality of life for current and future generations of west side residents. • Multifaceted, successful outreach efforts and the implementation of community feedback encourages trust and connection among stakeholders and community entities. • Adoption of the Master Plan sets the stage for funding approvals for current and future capital improvements connected to the Glendale Regional Park community We urge Mayor Mendenhall, City Council Members, and parks staff to continue engagement and implementation of Transportation Advisory Board's (TAB) recommendations as well, such as: • Continued assessment of transportation needs including access to the park by families, bicyclists, community members. • Strong consideration to safety structures along 1700 South like pedestrian activated stop signs, traffic calming measures, on-street and off-street parking options, and any other opportunity to negate harm. • Park planners must coordinate with UTA on providing improved transit services to the park. This is a plan that will not sit on a shelf. We expect active, established programming partnerships and continued community engagement to facilitate consistent utilization of the space at every phase of this multi-year project. We look forward to this park serving our community toward a healthy, livable and equitable future. Yours sincerely, �2A21ZyLCL C�aryn.¢rtbd2 Brianna Binnebose, Interim Chair Ginger Cannon Samantha Finch Jenny Hewson Phil Carroll CJ Whittaker Melanie Pehrson-Noyce Clayton Scrivner Aaron Wiley Meridith Benally TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD Salt Lake City Transportation Division Office-349 South Zoo East, Suite 150 - P.O. Box 145502 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5502 October 28, 2022 Salt Lake City Planning Commission&Salt Lake City Council RE: Letter of Support—Glendale Regional Park Master Plan On behalf of the Salt Lake City Transportation Advisory Board, I write in support of Salt Lake City's initiative to construct a regional park in the location of the old Raging Waters site. Detailed plans of the proposed park were presented to the Transportation Advisory Board at their October meeting with a great deal of discussion and unquestionable support and enthusiasm,including the proposed three crosswalks along 1700 South.The discussion stressed that planners should work with the SLC Transportation Division to ensure the safety of all visitors and users. Issues to be addressed regarding 1700 South included access by family bicyclists,pedestrian activated stop signs at crosswalks,traffic calming to reduce speed and the issue of on-street parking in case there are not sufficient off-street stalls.The Transportation Division is aware of the proposed plan and already has a project manager assigned to look at 1700 South and has allocated some funds to start a low-cost project to address some these concerns.The park planners should also coordinate with UTA on providing transit service to the park.As the project progresses,the Transportation Advisory Board will provide comments and feedback to ensure that these issues and concerns are addressed. This park would provide a place to recreate for residents of the Glendale community, as well as other westside neighborhoods. It will be constructed in a location that has long been an eyesore for the community,which will improve the neighborhood quality and allow for more access to healthy recreation.The current plans show that the regional park can be accessed using many modes of transportations.This allows for all types of users to be able to enjoy the amenities that this park would provide. The Transportation Advisory Board supports the recommendations in the Glendale Regional Park Master Plan with commitment to addressing the safety issues and concerns presented with the development of this new park. This plan is an opportunity to provide a more equitable distribution of recreation to the residents of Salt Lake City. Sincerely, Greg Sanchez, Chair Transportation Advisory Board Item E1 •••• ' "'z MOTION SHEET _ CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ivy ii� •_'t°'.-• ii � I�'� iip TO: City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet Policy Analyst DATE: March 21,2023 RE: Annexation of property into Salt Lake City Located at approximately 2200 West between 2800 North—33oo North MOTION i I move the Council accept a petition to annex property located at approximately 2200 west between 2800 North to 33oo North,and the Jordan River for further consideration. MOTION 2 I move the Council deny the petition without prejudice to the applicant's right to refile an annexation petition at any time in the future. I further move,pursuant to Utah Code Section lo-2-418,the council initiate a legislative action requesting the City administration start a City led process to annex the properties in unincorporated Salt Lake County, generally located north of 21oo north and west of I-215.This will be formally confirmed at an upcoming Council Meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 RECEIVED MAR 17 2023 NOTICE OF INTENT CITY RECORDER TO FILE A PETITION FORANNEXATION INTO SALT LAKE CITY Pursuant to U.C.A S 10-2403(6), 1,petitioner, on behalf of XCEL DEVELOPMENT, LLC, D& J BANGERTER FAM TR ET AL, LINEHAN, SHIRLENE F; TC ET AL, TERRELL, ROSHAWN,CELLA,TYLER LARSEN, SEAN, KIDSCO, LLC, SHIMIZU, DANNY,do hereby inform you of the intent to submit to SALT LAKE CITY, a formal petition for annexation of property located East of 2200 West Between 2800 North, 3300 North and the Jordan River and consisting of approximately 147.97 acres. This notice is being sent to you because you are considered an "affected entity" as defined in U.C.A.510-2-401 (a). David S. Tolman Managing Member This Notice sent to(See Next Page): Salt Lake City Recorder Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement P.O. Box 145515 2020 North Redwood Road Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5515 Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 Salt Lake County Mayor's Office Salt Lake City School District 2001 South State Street, Ste N2-200 SLC Schools Superintendent Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 440 East 100 South Salt Lake County Council Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 2001 South State Street N2-200 Salt Lake County Public Works Salt Lake City,Utah 84114-4575 2001 South State Street Salt Lake City Mayor's Office SLC UT 84190-3050 P.O.Box 145474 Salt Lake County Public Salt Lake City,UT 84114-5474 Works/Municipal Serv. Salt Lake City City Attorney 2001 South State Street N3-600 P.O.Box 145478 Salt Lake City, Utah 84190 Salt Lake City Council Salt Lake County Regional Development P.O. Box 145476 2001 South State Street S2-100 Salt Lake City,Utah 84114-5476 P.O.Box 144575 Salt Lake City Department of Airports Salt Lake City,Utah 84114-4575 776 N.Terminal Drive Salt Lake County Stormwater Salt Lake City,Utah 84122 2001 South State Street,N3-120 Salt Lake City Dept.Of Public Utilities Salt Lake City,Utah 84190 1530 S.West Temple Salt Lake Unified Fire Authority Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 3380 South 900 West Salt Lake City Dept.of Transportation Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 349 South 200 East, Suite 150 Salt Lake Valley Law Enforcement Salt Lake City,Utah 84111 Service Area Granite School District 3365 South 900 West Steve Hogan,Director of Boundaries Salt Lake City, UT 84119 2500 South State Street Salt lake City, Utah 84115-3110 Greater Salt Lake Municipal Services District 2001 S State, #N 3-600, Salt Lake City, UT 84190 Jordan River Commission P.O.Box 526081 Salt Lake City, Utah 84152-6081 Kern River Gas Transmission Co. 2755 East Cottonwood Parkway,Suite 300 Salt Lake City, UT 84121 Rocky Mountain Power 201 S.Main Street Suite 2300 SLC UT 84111 M• 4 =� Annexation to Salt Lake City "�Irrewa•• OFFICE USE ONLY Planning Project#: Received By: Date Received: Project Name: Legacy ousincs Pork PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION Is the subject area bordering the current boundaries of Salt Lake City? ® Yes ❑ No Request: Pursuant to Utal,Code Ann.10 2 402(2),noice is hearby given that the property owner identlficd beuw intends to rile an amexation petition with Salt Lake City, in Salt Lake County,Utah. Location of Subject Property: Name of Sponsor: Phone: Dave Tolman - Address of Sponsor: E-mail of Sponsor: Cell: Sponsor's Interest in Subject Property: David Tolman on behalf of XCEL Development.LLC is the owner of the majority of the property within the area intending to file the annexation petificn. + Please note that additional information may be required to ensure adequate information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, forthe purposes of public review by any interested party. AVAILABLE CONSULTATION 4 Planners are available for consultation prior to submitting this application. Please email zoning@slcgov.com and RecorderRouting@slcgov.com if you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application. WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION Apply online through the Citizen Access Portal(step-by-step guide).Also, email application to RecorderRouting@slcgov.com (please title subject line as "ANNEXATION application") AREQUIRED FEE Filing fee of$1,427 Plus additional fee for required public notices will be assessed after the application is submitted. SIGNATURE If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required. Signature of Owner or Agent: _ Date: 03-16-2023 Updated 12/06/22 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Letter requesting the Annexation Xa 1. A letter requesting the Annexation should be addressed to the Mayor of Salt Lake City. 2. Please answer the following questions on an attached sheet/s: a EX-1 1. What is the current use of the land? ® 2. What services are currently provided by another municipality,county, or special district? X❑ 3. Please identify any legal or factual barriers that would negatively affect the probability of annexation of the subject property? 3. Please include with the application(all requirements listed in UCA 10-2-403(3)): X 1. A digital Sidwell map of the area. 0 a 2. A copy of the notice sent to affected entities as required under Subsection 10-2-403(2)(a)(i)(B) and a list of the affected entities. aa 3. Name and address of all property owners. 0 4. Petition with signatures of property owners who support the Annexation in accordance with UCA 10-2-403(3)(b). 5. If the petition proposes a cross-county annexation please review UCA 10-2-402.5 and 10-2-402.5(4)(a)(ii)(A) concerning additional requirements. 0 EX 6. Petition can have up to five of the signers as sponsors,one must be designated as the contact sponsor, also include the mailing address of each sponsor. 0 OX 7. A digital (PDF) copy of the Annexation Plat. 0 0 8. The Annexation Plat should show the following(UCA 17-23-20(4)(f)): a. that it has been prepared and certified by a licensed land surveyor; b. accurately drawn to scale; c. a complete legal description the area; d. total acreage of the area; e. and signature blocks for the City Engineer,City Attorney,City Recorder,and Salt Lake County Recorder. FILLING WITH SALT LAKE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE 4 Please note that a copy of the complete application must also be filed with the Salt Lake County Clerk's Office following Receipt at the City Recorder's office.The County Clerk's office is located at: 2001 South State Street, Room S-1100 INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed. I understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following items are included in the submittal package. Updated 12/16/22 DocuSign Envelope ID:388400B5-7F70-40FA-BFDA-4DBBB2E76613 DocuSign Envelope ID:SE85[SE/2-88AD-4FFF-5755-85C680C907CE PETITION TO ANNEX PROPERTY INTO SALT LAKE CIIYWRISMI'M (this page may be duplicated if necessary) Name of Applicant: David Tolman Address of Applicant: Date: 7/12/2022 NOTICE:There will be no public election on the annexation proposed by this petition because Utah law does not provide fur an annexation to be approved by voters at a public election. If you sign this petition and later decide that you do not support the petition,you may withdraw your signature by submitting a signed,written withdrawal to the Salt Lake City Recorder. if you choose to withdraw your Si�!natli re,Nou shall do so no later than 30 days after Salt Lake City receives notice that the petition has been rcriitica. As an owner of property supporting the proposed Annexation intc Salt Lake City Jurisdiction I agree to the proposed annexation. HL Dave Tolman 7/12/2022 w, Print Name Address Signature 1 e' Denise 0—Sio—d br Russell 9/14/2022 Print Name Address 4aB Date Danny Shimizu u"neuw. 9 15/2022 Z Print Name Address ' gtrEE6435 Date Tyler Cella w 9/15/2022 u CellA, Print Name Address Date —1FwN r+trag L'I14 a2ffi, J Print Name Address 7-Signature Date UoeuspmO oy: Roshawn Terrell F�,k. 9/23/2022 Print Name Address 9AE44eU Date 1 o rS �a 1. � /0-S-2o22 Print Name vAddress Signature Date Updated 10/27/21 DocuSign Envelope ID:5FD491AD-260D-4F00-A484-A63044D66F64 ' PETITION TO ANNEX PROPERTY INTO SALT LAKE CITY JURISDICTION (this page may be duplicated if necessary) 1.21 It. Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Aldres� Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Updated 10/27/21 XCEL Development, LLC : 3813 S i;11-idgN anC, Court Bountiful, liJT 64010 Honorable Mayor Erin Mendenhall Salt Lake City 451 S. State Street, Suite 306 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Re: A!'1'"exia ha Aws East of 22OLLFaN Rel'yft eEll 2+lTa�0ON, ��..J.300 N the Jordan Cr iar:�u. Parc6s: 08-09-416-029, 08-09-476-030, 08-09-426-007, 08-09-426-006, 08-0907- -01.5, i 18-10-100-002, 08-09-276-021.; 08.09—2,rF_;-020, 09-09- 42 6-0 08-09-20-010, 08-09 276-013, Oc' '- 0_) 276,.022, ri 8-G9-27�- 004, 08-09-2/6-0031 08-09-27 -018, 08-09-;76-017, and a pcnlion o the 2200 West Right of Way Dave Tolman of XCEL Development, LLC, owner of approxirririiA ,r 1.)(-) i:h-- 147.97 acres ire, li ded in this annexation petition, formally r�-!ci!.!,2sts the, annexation or .he -.hove-r-,�fererwed parcels to Salt. I-.ake City. Please refer to the attached Ognatures of Hhe propertl, owners participating in this annexation. Concurrent with annexation, the property ommers are requesting rezoning to M-1 Liglrl: Manuf�jccuring District. The property (.)�,vners are ,Aare of the City's concern that the M-1 yard setbacks are insufficient for the tv e of desired dovelopment. We request the City impose the RP — Rzminc�ss Perk District development standards Nand in Salt Lake City Section 21A.=12.,730,t=: 'through H either as , condition of die rezank Or t hrOugh a !-)evelopment Agreement. The property owner, are �.jl so aware of the (:it:y's concerns with i?uilding sizes :ii-iC M„I"li; along 2200 West and am overt 'V i nposing rn-xiEi--!urn builclinf; size and i"tight standards for buikAngs along Honorable Mayor Erin Mendenhall Annexation of 147.97 Acres East of 220OW Between 2BOON, 3300N,and the Jordan River March 16, 2023 Page 2 I am available to discuss our annexation request at your convenience. Don't hesitate to contact me at I appreciate your consideration. Sincerely, David S. Tolman Manager Member XCEL Development, LLC ; cc: Paxton Guymon Stephen McCutchan 1. What is the current use of the land? a. Agricultural with some rural residences 2. What services are currently provided by another municipality, county, or special district? a. None 3. Please identify any legal or factual barriers that would negatively affect the probability of annexation of the subject property? a. None The area proposed to be annexed into Salt Lake City includes a portion of 2200 W currently located in Salt Lake County, per the County's request. Names and Addresses of All Property Owners: on following page Pt 29.98 Pt 39.98 1 �- _ i SWISS S,,— MIS mr ------------ --------- ----—-- - ------ - 4mm INS Roar er as SIT~ MISS fv= MIS, IS E 1/2 SE 1/4 Sac 09 TIN RIW 0 IN'-i W SALT LAKE COUNTY,UIAH F 08-09-42 Pt 29." P R4 —- ----------- Lis I .1101, Pr3mm WA *a prawn TNs mW a W—,"—q—xwW phy"pW,6 lemantoa%"r..n pbyacW bwod-n a—y of dw ptop"my be oom—y W 1/2 SW 1/4 Sec 10 TIN RIW M- - I SALT LAKE COUNTY,UTA I I rid 6"'.. Ll W-11, MIO-31 RI cl i. II 10 li Fl 24.73 Pt 29." Pt 29." li h 24.73 --------- -- W 1/2 NW 1/4 Sec 10 TIN RIw SALT LAKE COUNTY,UTAH EE 08-10-11 II ft 2AM Pt 41-14 N41A Pt 41-58 II ------------------------ -------------- -- -——---- ----- - ------- ------ -----------\-'- lbarsu �s... 3 wwr Ai ___ � R71M A \ ft2PM Pt 29." Elt2NEI/4 Sec O9TINRIW F[�* I SALT LAKF COUNTY,UTAII ... ffiFFIll 08-09-22 CENOR ------- -----—--- --------- - —---------- ------- Pt 147.90 Pt4lS9 22.62 ul e II 3300 N ST -— --------- --- --------- ------ - --------- -------- ------------------------ -------- --------------- -0, -----------------------rr - ---------------------------- -- ----------- ----------- ------------- II rrw -------- ------ ----------- --- -- --------------------- ---------- ----------------------- fit3l/2018 z. W 1/2 NE 1/4 Sec 09 TIN RIW 0 SALT LAKF COUNTY,UTAH F�. 08-0*9-2 Xcel Development, LLC Xcel Development, LLC Owner of 08092260010000 Owner of 08092760210000 Owner of 08094760300000 1184 S 1300 E 3813 S HIGHLAND CT 3813 S HIGHLAND CT BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 Lane Jensen & Gayle Jensen Livin Trust Laval Ashworth, LLC Xcel Development, LLC Owner of 0809252910000 Owner of 08092760220000 Owner of 08101000020000 3290 N 2200 W PO BOX 540038 3813 S HIGHLAND CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 Kidsco, LLC Patti Jensen Living Trust Owner of 08092760030000 Owner of 08092760250000 2011 MAPLE HOLLOW WY 3286 N 2200 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 Tyler Cella, Sean Larsen D & J Bangerter Family Trust Owner of 08092760040000 Owner of 08094260010000 2041 W 1400 S 3034 N 2200 W WOODSCROSS UT 84087 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 Shirlene & John Fife Owner of 08092760100000 Owner of 08094260020000 3118 N 2200 W 3034 N 2200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 Roshawn Tercel] Xcel Development, LLC Owner of 08092760130000 Owner of 08094260060000 3138 N 2200 W 3813 S HIGHLAND CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 Xcel Development, LLC Xcel Development, LLC Owner of 08092760160000 Owner of 08094260070000 3813 S HIGHLAND CT 3813 S HIGHLAND CT BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 Danny B Shimizu Owner of 08092760170000 Owner of 08094760180000 3256 N 2200 W 2908 N 2200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 Danny B Shimizu Owner of 08092760180000 Owner of 08094760280000 3256 N 2200 W PO BOX 1344 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 BOUNTIFUL UT 84011 Xcel Development, LLC Xcel Development , LLC Owner of 08092760200000 Owner of 08094760290000 3813 S HIGHLAND CT 3813 S HIGHLAND CT BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 FINAL LOCAL ENTTrY PLAT - / L' CUDAHY LN 096-� LEGACY BUSFqESS PARK ANNEXATION SALT LAKE 70 TO SALT LAKE CITY DAMS a 3300 N. COUNTY 70 COUNTY 38 1 Q. LOT 14 LOT 13 UNINCORPORATED H/1vCK1EY,5R0THfR5,LLC 1 SALT LAKE SALT LAKE COUNTY 06-09-226-00/ \ CITY (R=North 89050'36"East) \ NO S89053'58"E 460.37" )O NORTH STREET • • ) tANE JENSEN t "middle channel of LIVING TRUST APO S9�T ORDgN RIDER USC 17-1 20iver" �s� _...\ 08-09-252-OOI PATH JENSEN LIVING TRUST 08.09-276-025 H/NCKLEYBROTHER5,LLC ti0, LOT 12 VICINITY MAP ! 06-09-226 (N.T.S.) (R=EAST) •p S RIVER BEND INDURIAL S89°44'34"E 1523.59' r- 0 1 SUBD MSION • `9 "Parcel 16" LOT 1 G� MI2D >_" SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE DANNY B SUBDISHIVISION "Parcel 15" 10SHIMIZU E#5738822 DANNY B SHIMIZU y 08-09-276-017 08-09-276-018 9G LOT 11 I,Brian F.Mitchell,with CIR Engineering+Surveying,do hereby certify that I am a Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Utah and that I hold License No.5707871 in accordance with Title 58,Chapter 22,of the Professional Engineers and Land "Parcel 14" -9� / Surveyors Act:do hereby certify that a Final Local Entity Plat,in accordance with Section 17-23-20 was made by me and shown - KIDSCO,LLC 9� /oe os-27s-oo3 DAM hereon is a true and correct representation of said Final Local Entity Plat. o '; S P` LA m N "Parcel 13" COUNITY N TYLER CELLA;SEAN LARSEN 9 ` 3 66.0' Signed this day of ,20 g 08-09-276-004 BRI FA `o Z "middle channel of M1 Z "Parcel 1" �''- a Jordan River" 0 5707 71 XCEL DEVELOPMENT,LLC USC 17-1-20 E#13569385,Bk:11119,P9:8399 LOT 10 arr P� 08-09-276-020 "Par BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION .••—••—••.•.—..—..— • LAVALASHWORWORTH,LLC; "Parcel 2" ✓O -z1s PARKWAY cunnecr snir tpxe cmnouoonnv T c LAVAL D FAMILY,LLC XCEL � COMMERCIAL An annexation into Salt Lake City located in he East Half of Sec ion 9 and the West Half of Section 10,Township 1 North,Range 08-09-276-022 DEVELOPMENT,LLC CONDOMINIUM 2ND S89°24'19"W 68.99' t— 1 West,Salt Lake Base and Meridian and is described as follows: AMENDED. Parcel 11 N E#13569387,8k:11119, '�'i` " " � Pg:8404 F� Beginning at the Southeast corner of a current Salt Lake City boundary described in that Payne Annex to Salt Lake City ` ROSHAWN TERRELL 08-09-276-021 "Parcel 3" recorded April 22,1976 as Entry No.2807180 in Book 76-4,at Page 83 in the Office of he Salt Lake County Recorder,which is IEEE08-09.276.013 XCEL DEVELOPEMENT,LLC 1084.18 feet N.89°4447"W.along the Section line and 927 96 feet North from the Southeast Corner of said Section 9:thence BLAND ANNEX TO M SALT LAKE CITY r— " E#13569387,Bic 11119,Pg:8404 North 165.00 feet along said Payne Annex to Salt Lake City to a southerly line of Rudy Subdivision recorded November 19,1993 E13329189 Z• Parcel 10"SHIRLENE&JOHN FIFE 08-09.276-016 as Entry No.5661457 in Book 93-11 of Plats,at Page 308 in the Office of said Recorder;thence along said Rudy Subdivision the 08-09-276-010 following three(3)courses:1)N.89°59'08"E.(Record=N 89°41'45"E)2.02 feet;2)N.00°18'54"E.(Record=N 00°01'31"E) 221.29 feet and;3)S.89044'10"W.(Record=S 89°26'54"W)200.00 feet to a easterly line of a current Salt Lake City boundary R=761.59' "Parcel 4" established by Bland Annex to Salt Lake City recorded August 29,1979 as Entry No.3329189 in Book 79-8 of Plats,at Page 293 L=233.05' =iv XCEL DEVELOPMENT,LLC in the Office of said Recorder;thence North 864.54 feet more or less along the East boundary line of said current Salt Lake City w E#13569399,Pg:11119,Pg:8428 boundary to the southwesterly comer of Bangerter Annex to Salt Lake City recorded March 8,1985 as Entry No.4059050 in O 08-10-100-002 Book 85-3 of Plats,at Page 39 in the Office of said Recorder;thence along said Bangerter Annex to Salt Lake City the following • CHB=N8°45'12"W $ hree(3)courses:1)N.8804243"E.244.65 feet;2)North 176.99 feet;3)S.89°24'47"W.243.57 feet to said current Salt Lake x+ CH=232.14' 'parcel 9" o zo Cityboundary established b Bland Annex to Salt Lake City;thence along said East boundary line of Bland Annex to Salt Lake Y Y tY: 9 rY au�i D&J BANGERTER -N City the following four(4)courses:1)North 165 50 feet more or less to a point of non-tangency with a 761.59 foot radius curve to ZFAMILY TRUST z tO he left,concave westerly;2) Northerly 233.05 feet along the arc of said curve,through a central angle of 17031'58"(Chord bears 07/07/2021 o N.08°45'12"W.232.14 feet);3)N.173111"W.271.40 feet;4)S.89°24'19"W.68.99 feet to a point on the westerly right-of-way �S89024'47"W z • • 08-09-426-001 of 2200 West Street;thence N.17°31'11"W.(R=Northwesterly)780.65 feet along said right-of-way line of 2200 West Street to 243.57' 0 200 400 he West extension of the North line of Shimzu Subdivision recorded February 14,1994 as Entry No.5738822 in Book 94-2 of i BANGERTE 1 r Plats,at Page 40 in the Office of said Recorder;thence S.89°44'34"E.(Record=East)1523.59 feet along said extension,North ANNEX TO 0 1 e in F line and,East extension thereof to the center of the Salt Lake City Sewerage&Drainage Canal and an interior corner of that SALT LAKE CITY O� Scale in Feet E#4059050 Z parcel of land described in that Quit Claim Deed recorded February 17,2021 as Entry No.13569399 in Book 11119,at Page • 8428 in he Office of said Recorder;thence N.36°37'07"W.(Record=N.36°52'34"W.)371.44 feet along said center of Salt N88°42'43"E Lake City Sewerage&Drainage Canal and westerly boundary line to a northwesterly comer of said parcel being on a westerly 244.65' w extension of an existing fence:thence S.89°53'58"E.(Record=North 89°50'36"East)460.37 feet more or less along said existing fence and northerly boundary line of said parcel of land and extension thereof to a current Salt Lake County boundary described as the"middle channel of the Jordan River"in Utah State Code 17-1-21;thence Southeasterly along said current Salt "Parcel 5" 5 < Lake County boundary"middle channel of the Jordan River"to a northeasterly extension of an existing westerly right-of-way line XCEL DEVELOPMENT,LLC of Interstate-215 described as Utah Department of Transportation Project No.SP-0067(1)0;thence along said westerly E#13569399,Pg:11119,Pg:8428 O "middle channel of right-of-way of Interstate-15 the following three(3)courses:1)S.45014'46"W.(Record=S 44°59'20"W)248.79 feet; 08-09-426-006 he Jordan River" 2)S.30°50'27"W.(Record=S 30°35'01"W)764.63 feet;3)S.20'1847"W.(Record=S 20°03'21"W)116.77 feet to a northerly USC 17-1-20 line of a current Salt Lake City boundary described in that Bowen Annexation to Salt Lake City recorded December 9,1975 as • Entry No.2767463 in Book 75-12,at Page 189 in the Office of said Recorder; hence N.89033'13"W.(Bowen Annex=West) SALT LAKE CITYI Parcel 6" 1599.77 feet along said current Salt Lake City boundary to the Point of Beginning. XCEL ��' Legend of Symbols DEVELOPMENT, Contains approximately 151 acres more or less = LLC ay^R��ytio \ & Abbreviations oB os azs o07 • 5 �� \ NARRATIVE \ Proposed Annexation Boundary This plat and the description hereon have been prepared for the purpose of annexing into the corporate limits of Saft lake City the Previous Salt Lake City Boundary area described and graphically depicted hereon.The information shown hereon was compiled from documents of record found in _.._.._.._.._ the Office of the Salt Lake County Recorder and does not purport to be based upon an actual survey of the area to be annexed. Current Saft Lake City Boundary Said annexed area contains a portion of 2200 West Street and the following sixteen If 6)parcels known by the Salt Lake County "Parcel B" �p Assessor as:Parcel 1:08-09-276-020, Parcel 2:08-09-276-021,Parcel 3:08-09-276-016,Parcel 4:08-10-100-002;Parcel 5: (R=S 89°26'54-W) XCEL DEVELOPMENT,LLC ro o)^� Current Saft Lake County Boundary 08-09-426-006, Parcel 6:08-09-426-007,Parcel 7:08-09-476-029,Parcel 8:OB-09-476-030,Parcel 9:08-09-426-001,Parcel 10: BLAND ANNEX TO S 89°44'10"W 08-09-476-030 ^ ry 0 08-09-276-010,Parcel 11:08-09-276-013,Parcel 12:08-09-276-022,Parcel 13:08-09-276-004,Parcel 14:08-09-276-003,Parcel 15: SALT LAKE CITY 200.00' 'Parcel 7" S� �� Adjacent Parcel 08-09-276-018,Parcel 16:08-09-276-017. #3329189 ni XCEL DEVELOPMENT,LLC L,h �P he Existing Fence W w E#13569392,Bk:11119,P 8414 � g' ;o � PREPARED BY: u-i - 08-09-476-029 0 > • i GARY r1AM!"TON it N M �o e 2 Qo Angle Point in Annexation Boundary(Not Marked) oa-o9-47G-o2i Zo s SHEET RUDY o N z aC CiR SUBDIVISION Z J Section Corner Monument(Not Located) CIVIL ENGINEERING w E#5661457. +SURVI ING N 89059'08"E JOHN L PAYNE 2- Cli 06-09-476-027 E R 2.02' • 1 10718 South Beckstead Lane,Suite 102,South Jordan,Utah 84095 PAYNE ANNEX TO p (435)-503-7641 SALT LAKE CITY Z (R=S 20'03'21'W) E12807180 S20°18'47"W 116.77' CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR west1599.77' "—"—" FINAL LOCAL ENTITY PLAT PO B I cunnrrrt Sur tact att ewtnoonv I hereby certify that I have had this plat examinetl by this office and Approved this day of A.D.20 by the C c c p/� �( ANNEXATION � C�//�T w' _ LAKK/N LNTLKPK/5L5 LLC; it is correct in accordance with information on file. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. LEGACY BUSINESS PARK K A N N EXA 1 I O N(p LARC/N fNTERPR/SE,LLC,- -p 06-/0-300-012 CA 08-09-476-028 o�e� KEVINDALLENt TO SALT LAKE CITY N BOWEN ANNEXATION TO 4� City Engineer Date ASSOCIATES lNC SALT LAKE CITY w y 06-09-476-004 = #E 276746a B:75-12.P:189 `b oc, LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 9&WEST HALF OF SECTION 10 F SALT LAKE CITY "FP TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST,SALT LAKE BASE&MERIDIAN O City Surveyor Date Planning Director SALT LAKE CITY,SALT LAKE COUNTY,UTAH I os os i 1084.18' os 10 CITY ATTORNEY CITY APPROVAL SALT LAKE COUNTY SURVEYOR SALT LAKE COUNTY RECORDER 6 16 N.89°44'47'W. 2640.43'(BASIS OF BEARING) '6 15 Approved to form this day of A.D.20 Presented to Salt Lake City this day of Approved this day of A.D.2023 as a Final Local Recorded# A.D.20 and is hereby approved. Entity Plat by the Salt Lake County Surveyor. State of Utah,County of Salt Lake,Recorded and filed at the request of South Quarter Corner Southeast Corner Section 9 Section 9,T.1 N.,R.1 W.,SLB&M TA N.,R.1 W.,SLB&M Date: Time: Book: Page: Salt Lake City Mayor Salt Lake City Attorney Salt Lake City Recorder Salt Lake County Surveyor Fee$ Deputy,Salt Lake County Recorder ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor v 9 and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas �n` _� Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Lis (Mar 21,2023 13:48 MDT) Date Received: 3/21/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 3/21/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: March 20, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community&Neighborhoods SUBJECT: PLNPCM2022-00937 Legacy Business Park Annexation(REVISED) STAFF CONTACT: Nick Norris, Planning Director(nick.norris@slcgov.co or 801-535-6173) DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: That the Council accept the revised annexation application by adopting the resolution. If accepted, it means that the City will process the Annexation proposal and return to the City Council for a final decision as prescribed by Utah Code. BUDGET IMPACT: None at this time BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On March 17, 2023 Salt Lake City accepted a petition for a proposed annexation of unincorporated land into the City. The annexation, formerly known as Misty River or Legacy Business Park, is located east of 2200 West between 2800 North, 3300 North, and the Jordan River. The annexation includes approximately 147.97 acres. The annexation is proposing the land be zoned M-1, Light Manufacturing with the imposition of BP (Business Park) District development standards as presented in City Code 21A.32.030 C through H. The initial application for the property was accepted by Salt Lake City on September 27, 2022; however,the certification was withdrawal due to an oversight on the petition information. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 The proposed annexation does create an island or peninsula, and therefore requires the Salt Lake County Council to agree to the creation of the island or peninsula. The County Council has not opted to take formal action prior to the submission of the petition. Utah Code regulating annexations requires that an application for an annexation be filed with the city and the County on the same day. That occurred on March 17, 2023. This establishes the application date for the annexation. The City Council is now tasked to determine if they accept the Petition by resolution or deny by motion within the 14-day window from the date of the notice. For this reason, time is of the essence. If no action is taken within the 14-day window, the Petition will be considered accepted. If the Council accepts the Petition a 30-day period of noticing begins and a Certification of Petition is issued if all requirements are met. Upon Certification, within 10 days the Recorder's office on behalf of the Council will mail a notice to each owner of real property locating within the proposed annexation area and post physical notices,post notice on the Utah Public Meeting Site,post on the website, and mail written notice to each affected entity. At this stage, protests may be submitted regarding the annexation. If protests are filed, the City Recorder will coordinate with appropriate entities and provide a written update to the City Council. Following the protest period, the City Council is required to hold a public hearing. Prior to the public hearing, the Planning Division will provide a transmittal with the proposed ordinance to annex the property and information regarding the proposed zoning. Adopting the zoning of the property is done as part of the annexation process and is not subject to the typical zoning process outlined in Utah Code or in City Ordinance. The rationale behind that is that the city cannot apply zoning outside of the city boundaries and State Code requires all land within the City to be zoned and therefore the zoning is adopted at the same time as the annexation is approved. State Code also does not require a recommendation from the Planning Commission on annexations or on the proposed zoning associated with annexed land. However, the City Council has the discretion to ask the Planning Commission for a recommendation. The annexation process is not subject to the 45-day public notice required by City Code. Due to noticing requirements outlined in Utah Code, applying the 45-day notice period may result in the City Council not being able to comply with the timing requirements for annexations in State Code. PUBLIC PROCESS: All notices for the proposed annexation that are required up to this point in time have been completed. This includes notice from the County for the adoption of the resolution that occurred on August 2, 2022 and notice of intent to file the annexation with affected agencies. Additional public process is required as indicated above. EXHIBITS: 1) Resolution 2) Annexation Application Materials 1 . Resolution RESOLUTION NO. OF 2023 ACCEPTING A PETITION TO ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 148 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED BETWEEN 2200 WEST STREET AND THE JORDAN RIVER AND BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY 2800 NORTH AND 3300 NORTH STREET FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE SECTION 10-2-405 WHEREAS, on March 17, 2023, David Tolman ("Petitioner") submitted a revised petition (Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00937) to annex into Salt Lake City approximately 148 acres of land situated between 2200 West Street and the Jordan River and between approximately 2800 North and 3300 North Street in unincorporated Salt Lake County (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the revised petition replaces one previously submitted that proposed annexing approximately 162 acres and included application deficiencies; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation would create at least one island of unincorporated land and therefore will be considered by the Salt Lake County Council; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation area is within an expansion area described as "Study Area 1 - West Airport" in the city's annexation policy plan titled, "A MASTER ANNEXATION POLICY DECLARATION for Salt Lake City, Utah" adopted in 1979 and as shown on the map accompanying that plan titled, "SALT LAKE CITY Annexation Policy Declaration Proposed Future Boundaries"; and WHEREAS, Utah Code Section 10-2-405 provides that a municipal legislative body may, within 14 days of receiving an annexation petition, accept an annexation petition for further consideration or deny it; and WHEREAS, accepting an annexation petition for further consideration pursuant to Section 10-2-405 does not constitute final approval of the annexation by the municipal legislative body and does not establish whether any particular zoning designation may be appropriate for potentially annexed land; and WHEREAS, because the Property is within Salt Lake City's expansion area in its 1979 annexation policy plan and because the Property is congruous to Salt Lake City corporate limits, the Salt Lake City Council finds that it should accept the subject annexation petition for further consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: That Petitioner's petition to annex approximately 148 acres into Salt Lake City is hereby accepted by the Salt Lake City Council for further consideration as provided by Utah Code Section 10-2-405. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By: CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Dare: March 21, 2023 CITY RECORDER Resolution accepting XCEL Development annexation petition March 2023 By Pa I C.NKclson enior City Attorney 2. Annexation Application Materials MAR I 1 2023 NOTICE OF INTENT (911"Y' RECORDER TO FILE A PETITION FOR ANNEXATION INTO SALT LAKE CITY Pursuant to U.C.A.S 10-2-403(6),I,petitioner,on behalf of XCEL DEVELOPMENT, LLC,D&J BANGERTER FAM TR ET AL, LINEHAN, SHIRLENE F;TC ET AL, TERRELL,ROSHAWN, CELLA,TYLER LARSEN, SEAN,KIDSCO,LLC, ` SHIMIZU,DANNY,do hereby inform you of the intent to submit to SALT LAKE CITY,a formal petition for annexation of property located East of 2200 West Between 2800 North,3300 North and the Jordan River and consisting of approximately 147.97 acres. This notice is being sent to you because you are considered an "affected entity"as defined in U.C.A. 510-2-401 (a). David S. Tolman Managing Member XCEL Development,LLC 3813 S Highland Court\ Bountiful,UT 84010 This Notice sent to(See Next Page): Salt Lake City Recorder Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement P.O.Box 145515 2020 North Redwood Road Salt Lake City,UT 84114-5515 Salt Lake City,Utah 84116 Salt Lake County Mayor's Office Salt Lake City School District 2001 South State Street, Ste N2-200 SLC Schools Superintendent Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 440 East 100 South Salt Lake County Council Salt Lake City,Utah 84111 2001 South State Street N2-200 Salt Lake County Public Works Salt Lake City,Utah 84114-4575 2001 South State Street Salt Lake City Mayor's Office SLC UT 84190-3050 P.O.Box 145474 Salt Lake County Public Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5474 Works/Municipal Serv. Salt Lake City City Attorney 2001 South State Street N3-600 P.O. Box 145478 Salt Lake City, Utah 84190 Salt Lake City Council Salt Lake County Regional Development P.O.Box 145476 2001 South State Street S2-100 Salt Lake City,Utah 84114-5476 P.O.Box 144575 Salt Lake City Department of Airports Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4575 776 N. Terminal Drive Salt Lake County Stormwater Salt Lake City, Utah 84122 2001 South State Street,N3-120 Salt Lake City Dept. Of Public Utilities Salt Lake City,Utah 84190 1530 S.West Temple Salt Lake Unified Fire Authority Salt Lake City,Utah 84115 3380 South 900 West Salt Lake City Dept.of Transportation Salt Lake City,Utah 84119 349 South 200 East, Suite 150 Salt Lake Valley Law Enforcement Salt Lake City,Utah 84111 Service Area Granite School District 3365 South 900 West Steve Hogan,Director of Boundaries Salt Lake City,UT 84119 2500 South State Street Salt lake City,Utah 84115-3110 Greater Salt Lake Municipal Services District 2001 S State,#N 3-600, Salt Lake City,UT 84190 Jordan River Commission P.O.Box 526081 Salt Lake City,Utah 84152-6081 Kern River Gas Transmission Co. 2755 East Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 300 Salt Lake City,UT 84121 Rocky Mountain Power 201 S. Main Street Suite 2300 SLC UT 84111 Annexation to Salt Lake City OFFICE USE ONLY Planning Project#: Received By: Date Received: Project Name: Legacy Business Park b PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION Is the subject area bordering the current boundaries of Salt Lake City? ® Yes ❑ No Request: Pursuant to Utah Code Ann.10-2-402(2),notice is hearby given that the property owner identified below intends to file an annexation petition with Salt Lake City, in Salt Lake County,Utah. Location of Subject Property: I Name of Sponsor: Phone: Dave Tolman 801-201-7720 Address of Sponsor: 3813 Highland Court,Bountiful,UT 84010 E-mail of Sponsor: Cell: dave@adaimedynamics.com Sponsor's Interest in Subject Property: David Tolman on behalf of XCEL Development,LLC is the owner of the majority of the property within the area intending to file the annexation petition. Please note that additional information may be required to ensure adequate information is provided y for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings,for the purposes of public review by any interested party. AVAILABLE CONSULTATION Planners are available for consultation prior to submitting this application. Please email zoning@slcgov.com and RecorderRouting@slcgov.com if you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application. WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION Apply online through the Citizen Access Portal (step-by-step guide).Also, email application to RecorderRouting@slcgov.com (please title subject line as"ANNEXATION application") JREQUIRED FEE Filing fee of$1,427 Plus additional fee for required public notices will be assessed after the application is submitted. SIGNATURE If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required. Signature of Owner or Agent: _ _ Date: 03-16-2023 Updated 12/06/22 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Letter requesting the Annexation ❑ X❑ 1. A letter requesting the Annexation should be addressed to the Mayor of Salt Lake City. 2. Please answer the following questions on an attached sheet/s: 0 ❑X 1.What is the current use of the land? ❑ ❑ 2.What services are currently provided by another municipality,county, or special district? ❑ X❑ 3. Please identify any legal or factual barriers that would negatively affect the probability of annexation of the subject property? 3. Please include with the application (all requirements listed in UCA 10-2-403(3)): ❑ IF 1. A digital Sidwell map of the area. ❑ 0 2. A copy of the notice sent to affected entities as required under Subsection 10-2-403(2)(a)(i)(B) and a list of the affected entities. ❑ 0 3. Name and address of all property owners. ❑ ❑ 4. Petition with signatures of property owners who support the Annexation in accordance with UCA 10-2-403(3)(b). ❑ ❑ 5. If the petition proposes a cross-county annexation please review UCA 10-2-402.5 and 10-2-402.5(4)(a)(ii)(A) concerning additional requirements. ❑ ❑ 6. Petition can have up to five of the signers as sponsors, one must be designated as the contact sponsor, also include the mailing address of each sponsor. ❑ ❑X 7. A digital (PDF) copy of the Annexation Plat. ❑ 0 8. The Annexation Plat should show the following(UCA 17-23-20(4)(f)): a. that it has been prepared and certified by a licensed land surveyor; b. accurately drawn to scale; c. a complete legal description the area; d. total acreage of the area; e. and signature blocks for the City Engineer,City Attorney,City Recorder,and Salt Lake County Recorder. FILLING WITH SALT LAKE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE -� Please note that a copy of the complete application must also be filed with the Salt Lake County Clerk's Office following Receipt at the City Recorder's office.The County Clerk's office is located at: 2001 South State Street, Room S-1100 INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed. I understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following items are included in the submittal package. Updated 12/16/22 DocuSign Envelope ID:3BB400B5-7F70-40FA-BFDA-408BB2E76613 DocuSign Envelope ID:BE85BE12-86AD-4FFF-B755.85C680C907CE PETITION TO ANNEX PROPERTY INTO SALT LAKE CITY JURISDICTION (this page may be duplicated if necessary) Name of Applicant: David Tolman Address of Applicant: 230 W Towne Ridge Pkwy Suite 520 Sandy UT 84070 Date: 7/12/2022 NOTICE: There will be no public election on the annexation proposed by this petition because Utah law does not provide for an annexation to be approved by voters at a public election. If you sign this petition and later decide that,you do not support the petition,you may withdraw your signature by submitting a signed,written withdrawal to the Salt Lake City Recorder.If you choose to withdraw your signature,you shall do so no later than 30 days after Salt Lake City receives notice that the petition has been certified. As an owner of property supporting the proposed Annexation into Salt Lake City Jurisdiction I agree to the proposed annexation. Sig. by: Dave Tolman 3813 Highland CT. Bountiful [�� T��"'�` 7/12/2022 esesaerwu Print Name Address Signature Date Denise [Lst' Sigmd°r 3230 N 2200 w 9/14/2022 Russell IPMO Print Name Address .11SjgffajVW84W Date 3250/3256 N -Doeusipnod by: Danny Shimizu 2200 W 9/15/2022 Print Name Address BVMME64W.. Date Tyler Cella 3208 N 2200 W t— gntd by q- C-ilo. 9/15/2022 Print Name Address `5j8ryQ "WF14F£ Date �S ls`N l�N 31 It it ZUW 01 flAk J Print Name Address 7-Signature Date F�UOCUSTVmd by: Roshawn Terrell In 9/23/2022 Print Name Address 9AF448o Date Print Name —� Address Signature Date Updated 10/27/21 DocuSign Envelope ID:6FD491AD-260D-4F00-A484-A63044D66F64 PETITION TO ANNEX PROPERTY INTO SALT LAKE CITY JURISDICTION (this page may be duplicated if necessary) e;me�Io• 22oow. I b 22 Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date , Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Print Name Address Signature Date Updated 10/27/21 XCEL Development LLC 3813 S Highland Court Bountiful, UT 84010 March 16, 202-',' Honorable Ndayor Erin Mendc,,,nhall Salt Lake City 451 -S. State St,( et, Suite 306 Salt (Lake City, ',Utah <I,)14I-1I Re: A 0'J' M'T'97 A"t'res Fast ofX?"OU)"IN, lietwevy; 2800% 3300M, arild, ii:h(� Juvdabri F.-'hv'm Pai',-cei!--,: 08-09-476-029, 084)9-476-030, 08-09-426-007 08-09-426-006 DEP09-276-016, 08-10-100-002, 0F409-776-021, 08-09-276.020, 08-09- 426-001, 00-09-276-010, Oc-;-09-276-022, 00-09-276- 0041 08-09-2140031 08-09-2116-01% OR-09-276-( 17Y and a portion of the 2200 West Right of Way Dade Tolman of XCEL Devclo)rnew:, IIC, owner of 126 acres 6ncludecl iniNs `innexaiion peti-don, formally requests the annexatkm of :see above-refierenced parcels to Salt Lake City. Please refer to the attached signatures of the property owners participating in this annc xation. Concurrent with annexation, the property owners are requesting rezoning to M-1 Light. Nlanufac-Luring- District, The property ownci's are avy are of Ulle r"ityls concern ",'.,rn;-A tL'he N/1-1 yaFd setbacks are insuffident for the type, of de-s,ir,M \Xe veqws! the City irTIPOSO) the FBP , - Businoss P ark District clex/elopmers standmds found. in Salt Luke (JIV Codre ,.1A.32.030,C through H either as as condkdon of We vzorling or through a Developrnent Agreenneni.-.. The, property ow.ner,'s are also aware of the City's concerns A 'ouiidhng sues and heighi-,�-. ak-wq, 2200 Wet and are Open to� size and h(Aght standards for buildings along 22CK) INYA Honorable Mayor Erin Mendenhall Annexation of 147.97 Acres East of 220OW Between 2800N,3300N, and the Jordan River March 16,2023 Page 2 E an-i avaiiaNe bc) discuss our annlexat` ofri e.I'( your convenience. Don't �,.hate .W cord-:act me at MCI) 201-I T20 or dave@aclaimedynamics.com. € appreciate your, ccs ?sioerazion, Sincerely, r.�', , axto u irtl r)n� Stephen Wl.,Cutchan 1. What is the current use of the land? a. Agricultural with some rural residences 2. What services are currently provided by another municipality, county, or special district? a. None 3. Please identify any legal or factual barriers that would negatively affect the probability of annexation of the subject property? a. None The area proposed to be annexed into Salt Lake City includes a portion of 2200 W currently located in Salt Lake County, per the County's request. Names and Addresses of All Property Owners: on following page s ^ 4 Fee F i I Pt 29.96 ! Ix F Pt2938 - I i � s 4 it R19l00! ij !I I a it seen i i F i� I i I; . � a w7A newo - Rg7E°29 i J 1 7 1 maxi— O J i of - i i =1 I mm � smsw wt.aa 9°" ana -�--,t,U----i `.Pi3wo14 _ 47� # RI]602° 9e Peei neoos ---- B0 z s s flaom Prw° € R47ow nea aw lira P 47°°H P newt aas l a � I � i� PrSPO°Il I e7" ; av 'Fte fea a I eea i � Few i —_ aeet �I Thie myr u ua inaaded b teptveot xoW PbYeiW WWatia.In ada b apbliah eeatePh.Ys•W 6atmderia B e,rtrel'o!�e W WRty meY be uaeawY. n aem l—W S S L a ■ !i E 1/2 SE 1/4 Sec 09 TIN R1W s : km i SALT LAKE COUNTY,UTAH P.r Fa ed F« an aco oB a -- srnrzm° 08-09-42 a. rs f I i; `•'� it I d� J it .,1 I I I � I 1 1 i xj AI ~j 1 i; el 1 1ldOIT 7t_•,k6�.� I \\ \ ft�24.7 'i Ro9awssae •'� Pt 29.98 \ ,� I 1 \ I Zi. I f ji RQ40RI160,6 �' o\!!p j) Pt 29.99 moan, h2A7i j i i �ea.oa��aKaq s�rJ+im t E E W 1/2 NW 1Oc TIN R1W = „ N015.Suk Sven M160v y/ F FM su w.c�ro.uun s��so SALT LAKE COUNTY,COUNTT Y,UTAH 801d6&JJ91 . NlOQa08 08-10 11 ; = a M1VV�M1kvnoNei.andoo wm� t J., CENIER II it II lq 147.90 II II Pt 41.58 II 22.62 5 II 330ON ST a us snx in man —-—--------———-—-------- I i_ g "»� ——--------- -31 Thi,—pis om inmodd w W—wuml physig pmp,,bm-I,mac w mablish—physical b—dada as—y ur tb,pmpetV may b,acemy. II I # . I 1 8 it —y—A W 1/2 NE 1/4 Sec 09 TIN RlW SALT LAKE COUNTY,UTAH 0�8-'�9-w2 I Xcel Development, LLC Xcel Development, LLC Owner of 08092260010000 Owner of 08092760210000 Owner of 08094760300000 1184 S 1300 E 3813 S HIGHLAND CT 3813 S HIGHLAND CT BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 Lane Jensen & Gayle Jensen Livingg Trust Laval Ashworth, LLC Xcel Development, LLC Owner of 08092520010000 Owner of 08092760220000 Owner of 08101000020000 3290 N 2200 W PO BOX 540038 3813 S HIGHLAND CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 Kidsco, LLC Patti Jensen Living Trust Owner of 08092760030000 Owner of 08092760250000 2011 MAPLE HOLLOW WY 3286 N 2200 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 Tyler Cella, Sean Larsen D & J Bangerter Family Trust Owner of 08092760040000 Owner of 08094260010000 2041 W 1400 S 3034 N 2200 W WOODSCROSS UT 84087 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 Shirlene & John Fife Owner of 08092760100000 Owner of 08094260020000 3118 N 2200 W 3034 N 2200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 _Roshawn Terrell Xcel Development, LLC Owner of 08092760130000 Owner of 08094260060000 3138 N 2200 W 3813 S HIGHLAND CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 Xcel Development, LLC Xcel Development, LLC Owner of 08092760160000 Owner of 08094260070000 3813 S HIGHLAND CT 3813 S HIGHLAND CT BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 Danny B Shimizu Owner of 08092760170000 Owner of 08094760180000 3256 N 2200 W 2908 N 2200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 Danny B Shimizu Owner of 08092760180000 Owner of 08094760280000 3256 N 2200 W PO BOX 1344 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 BOUNTIFUL UT 84011 Xcel Development, LLC Xcel Development, LLC Owner of 08092760200000 Owner of 08094760290000 3813 S HIGHLAND CT 3813 S HIGHLAND CT BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 FINAL LOCAL ENTITY PLAT ,pQ�—� ,EAoaH LN LEGACY BUSINESS PARK ANNEXATION 6m DAMTO SALT LAKE CITY "TM C� 3 UNINCORPORATED I'.,I\ SALT LAKE I SALT LAKE COUNTY I A V� STEP _ S89 53 58 E 6037 Y �\ lo F LIT12 ttIAnP 0 B 44J4�'Eri C12 i9' \ tv a AT o i, BaH MNz e- x,e°z DaNevesSMrzu �\EYS SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE \ae csnAm NYSAe LIT I �T, �\ m ...........,na,h..n DS.LL, ons or ec sores aEna�re DAVIS 3 c s N uRSEN \\ COUNTY .n v a saoaXCEL DEVELOPMENT LLC Erg 11P9 n+11 A eyes \01 UvaLABRwoRT Lc. °ere z T� _L BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION T IV Ae FAMILY C XCEL \ _ j A -�n� DEVELOPMENT LLC \ .u.xoLc.nA ROSAH ERRE L oa cs 05021 "cv�o.� _ ° XCELDEVELOPEMENT.LLC \\\ LJ SHIRLA &JD Exa oOw 175 o16 L=23305N XCEL DEVELOPMENT LLC \ N EA ill 6s ,eae ON H1210 FAMILY TRUST D&J BANGERTER .i ' IJ / Aa o-Dome '' z nBE92' ABP11260M /J 1 m / ^rm a nrurta / H 8B'42'43"E 2446E' XCEL DEVELOPMENT,LTC Euie 000e a26 W6 —� C1�➢ 9.J"f 1,1,7,1"11 SALT LAKE CRY �re.�XCEL e '�P"' ell 6a " Legend of Symbols I: DEVELOPMENT. +'\ co+ia� y i.aes .+ LLc & Abbreviations NARRATIVE PreviAuscSlIt Laxe EV 311111ry .Dllell Fuiranl Sall Lake Fly B—d, n a XCEL DEVELOPMENT.LLC �m CbAen SA II LAN,CA,,,E,,naery 511 t0"W waT5 ado Aa z 1-1 w Boa Ae2 2 rs aoe os 5Ao an. oe A525oa'f a c11 xLr 3,' - acern Perce as DE 101271An. -1....iAsiv Aal a. XCEL D 171N? IA. 0 s LL ner,+.eeer E —X Evst ng Fence Ang e PA nt n Annexat An BAuntlery INAt MarkeOi SHEET CIVIL ENGINEERING SUAnDArverMAnumen NA1 �1�1 C I R .1 SURVEYING 2 N BZ 59'08"E 1 IS-.,Ih Becxseah Lane.Sute 112.SA111h JDrdVn,UAh B4015 %-503 7641 YL �s21levrw,isn CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR we vns9977 - - -- - R FINAL LOCAL ENTITY PLAT �' h A1,h.n-.r r h. POB u �'� LEGACY BUSINESS PARK ANNEXATION TO SALT LAKE CITY SALT LAKE CTY `r 'E ``av LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF of SECTION 9 a WEST HALF of SECTION,o TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST.SALT LAKE BASE&MERIDIAN 0 psn ers o.,. Pa AD.n.r SALT LAKE CITY.SALT LAKE COUNTY.UTAH 09/a 09 1 _ 1084.18 --09B 10 CITY ATTORNEY CITY APPROVAL SALT LAKE COUNTY SURVEYOR SALT LAKE COUNTY RECORDER /6 /6 IN 89'44'47 W_2640,43'(BASIS OF BEARING) l6 15 wo..nnn 1 Ao A 4�owo ns exec y arJ a..E n tnr. 1u n c s L k R a o J1 o n ens wro.,e,. Emery Pal oy the 6a.L � .h o�;o,.�, .wr c South Duerier Corner Southeast Corner Section 9 Section 9,T.1 N.,R.1 W.,SLB&M T.1 N..R.1 W.,SLB&M e slit tax.cp At .s fiat L...Ctv Re-or.e Sat It.F—ty S—, oePety.11—e roilei Transmittal Annexation Application 3-20-2023 Final Audit Report 2023-03-21 Created: 2023-03-21 By: Thais Stewart(thais.stewart@slcgov.com) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAA9s71AHra6Z9fpFj1ZEdgSfMSrWSXSkGa "Transmittal Annexation Application 3-20-2023" History Document created by Thais Stewart (thais.stewart@slcgov.com) 2023-03-21 -7:16:58 PM GMT Document emailed to Blake Thomas (blake.thomas@slcgov.com) for signature 2023-03-21 -7:17:38 PM GMT Email viewed by Blake Thomas (blake.thomas@slcgov.com) 2023-03-21 -7:17:54 PM GMT 60 Document e-signed by Blake Thomas (blake.thomas@slcgov.com) Signature Date:2023-03-21 -7:42:33 PM GMT-Time Source:server C'► Document emailed to Lisa Shaffer(lisa.shaffer@slcgov.com) for signature 2023-03-21 -7:42:36 PM GMT Email viewed by Lisa Shaffer(lisa.shaffer@slcgov.com) 2023-03-21 -7:48:34 PM GMT © Document e-signed by Lisa Shaffer(lisa.shaffer@slcgov.com) Signature Date:2023-03-21 -7:48:55 PM GMT-Time Source:server Agreement completed. 2023-03-21 -7:48:55 PM GMT Names and email addresses are entered into the Acrobat Sign service by Acrobat Sign users and are unverified unless otherwise noted. Powered by Adobe ' Acrobat Sign ERIN MENDENHALL MARY BETH THOMPSON Mayor Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCILTRANSMITTAL lis (Mir1ZJ0J311-34MDT) Date Received: 03/17/23 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 03/17/23 TO: Salt Lake City Council Darin Mano, Chair DATE: March 17, 2023 FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Council Consent Agenda #7 Items Fiscal Year 2022-23 STAFF CONTACTS: Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 or John Vuyk, Budget Director(801) 535-6394 DOCUMENT TYPE: RE-TRANSMITTAL of Consent Agenda/Establish Grant Projects from Grant Holding Account RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that the City Council consent to the transfer of these grants and donations from the holding account and establish a project budget for them. BUDGET IMPACT: Grant Holding Account ($ 115,472.72) New Grant Project 115,472.72 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The grant holding account was established to fund grants between budget amendments with the understanding that the grants would be submitted as part of the next budget opening. Items transmitted are placed on a Council Consent agenda and then formally approved during the following budget amendment. On occasion, a similar process is employed for donations to the City. Where necessary, resolutions were previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept these grants and donations. EXHIBITS: Consent Agenda Detail Consent Agenda Summary DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 245 SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114 TEL 801-535-6403 _ W Section G: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award G-i: US Department of Homeland Security,FEMA- Misc. Grants $115,472.72 Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program Department:Fire Department Prepared By: Brittany Blair/Ann Garcia The Fire Department applied for and received a US Department of Homeland Security,FEMA grant in the amount of $115,472.72. This grant will be used to purchase equipment and personal protective equipment which is used by firefighters to protect the health and safety of the public and firefighting personnel against fire and fire-related hazards. Equipment includes: 116 ea.(NFPA 1977)Compliant-Wildland Goggles,Helmets,Pants,Web Gear/Backpacks/Canteens, and Shelters. The grant requires a match of$11,547.28 which is budgeted for within the Fire Departments general fund budget. A Public Hearing was held on 4-5-22 for the grant application on this award. 1 Fiscal Year 2022-23 Consent Agenda#7 Initiative Number/Name Fund Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Ongoing or One-time FrEs Section G: Council Consent Agenda-Grant Awards U S Department of Homeland Security,FEMA-Assistance to Firefighters Grant 1 MiscGranls 115,472.72 One Time o Program ��ouncill=jjpem Total of Budget Amendment Items 0.00 115472.72 0 Signature: Alejandro Sant ez(Mar 17,202310:54 MDT) Email: alejandro.sanchez@slcgov.com ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL C1 Gt,C Date Received: 2/24/2023 Rac el Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 2/24/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 2/24/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Racial Equity in Policing Commission STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Racial Equity in Policing Commission RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Jason Wessel as a member of the Racial Equity in Policing Commission. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj February 24,2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission. Jason Wessel to be appointed for a two year term ending on Monday,December 29, 2025, starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall,Mayor Cc: File P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received.. 3/6/2023 Rac el Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 3/6/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 3/6/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Teresa Gregori as a member of the Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj March 6, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board Teresa Gregori to be appointed for a three year term ending Monday,June 1,2026 starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall,Mayor Cc: File P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received.. 3/6/2023 Rac el Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 3/6/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 3/6/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Miranda Cask as a member of the Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj March 6, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board Miranda Cask to be appointed for a three year term ending Monday,June 1, 2026 starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall,Mayor Cc: File P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received.. 3/6/2023 Rac el Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 3/6/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 3/6/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Parks,Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Parks,Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Dave John as a member of the Parks,Natural Lands,Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj March 6, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Dear Councilmember Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Parks,Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. Dave John to be appointed for a three year term, starting from the date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall,Mayor Cc: File P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 .. Opened 3/15/2023 10:57 Jody Millard ADU's Dear Councilman Wharton,Thank you for opposing lifting the requirement that the one of the units be owner occupied.This is an important piece it preserving the integrity of our neighborhoods.As you know developers have deep pockets and can dome into a neighborhood,pay cash for homes and then build an ADU and end up with two rental units.No responsibility to the neighborhood.Most of these developers don't even live in SLC and never would.If the city is worried about the time it takes to add additional ADU's,they could think of ways to incentivize homeowners to build.Maybe low or no interest construction loans,like they did with rehab loans a few years back.If something is not aggressively done to protect homeowner properties,we will end up with a city of nothing but renters and that is never a good look.The only neighborhoods that may continue to exist would be the ones one the benches.And I'm not sure even those could hold out against the lure of cash investment for their home.Please hold strong and do all in your power to convince your fellow councilmen to protect our neighborhoods from rampant destruction due to all rentals.I also love how the article I read only stated the wonderful statistic that other cities who have done this have seen an immediate increase in ADU's being built.They forgot to mention that developers did it and turned everything into rentals.I don't appreciate this type of one-sided information dissemination.Sincerely,Jo Ellen Millard District resident 3/15/2023 10:59 Jan Hemming Thank you for your eloquent presentation today Thank you for your eloquent presentation today Councilman Wharton:Thank you for your eloquent and compelling statement today at the City Council work session about the wisdom of owner occupancy.Without your clear-headed discourse Salt Lake's housing policies could have undergone historic transformation.You brought critical attention to the dynamics facing Utah housing—powerful national and investment forces that could,as you said,leave homeowners"outnumbered and outgunned."Your careful research underscored the reality of today's marketplace.You were not speaking in hypotheticals,but facts.I also appreciated the legal insight you presented at last week's council session during your exchange with city attorney Kimberly Chytraus. If you hadn't asked such a perceptive question about what removal of owner occupancy really meant,Salt Lake could have ended single family zoning on what appeared to be a"back door"technicality.If you can share your statement read to the City Council today I would appreciate having a copy.It was one for the ages and should go down in the annuals of City Council history as the day Councilman Chris Wharton brought sense and sensibility to the issue of owner occupancy and single family zoning.I'm copying GACC chair Merrilee Morgan, a fellow community council colleague.Best,Janet(Jan)Hemming Chair Yalecrest Neighborhood Council 3/15/2023 15:47 Jennifer Fegely ADUs I support the poposed changes to the ADU policy.Make it easier,allow for larger square footage,keep the owner occupancy rule,and please fugure out a way to make it more affordable.Pre-approved plans would help.We met with the planning commission to inquire about the feasiblity of an ADU but abandoned the idea when they told us that it would likely cost-$230K for a detached garage/adu with a maximum 620 square faat 1 3/15/2023 16:19 Cm Crompton ADU Ordinance update please.Attn.all members Due to poor communication,confusing and conflicting notices and rampant misinformation by officials and please confused residents,please make clear what policies are a"done deal"and what policies and documents are negotiable.This information is essential for properly informed residents and the future of the city we all share. I have not received any response to my inquiries.C.Crompton 3/15/2023 16:21 Sabrina Fivas ADU's Hello,I'm writing to voice my opinion about requirements for ADU's.I live in Rose Park and I feel it would be a detriment to our neighborhood if the owner occupancy requirement was removed.Big companies will swoop in with cash and buy up existing houses making it even harder for hardworking people to buy their own homes. We will become a neighborhood of renters instead of helping people gain the financial stability of owning a home and hopefully helping their own family's"generational wealth"increase.Please keep the rule that owners must occupy a house on the property.Thank you,Sabrina Fivas .. Opened 3/16/2023 7:48 Anonymous Constituent homeless camps at liberty park liberty park has been overrun by tents,cars that are being lived in and garbage leftover from camps.i no longer take my kids to the park because the pavilions,tables and gazebo have people living there.its realy out of hand.i feel bad for the people that are in the tents as the temps are freezing and they do not have adequate facilities.everyone in the city government should be ashamed of how they are addressing unhoused citizen issues and the issues created by inadequate care for the citizens trying to enjoy public spaces 3/16/2023 15:45 Margaret Miller Please do not loosen requirements for ADU's Please reconsider your plan to make it easier to build ADU's.I live in the avenues which has a higher density of housing than most neighborhoods and a lot of short term rentals.Removing the owner occupancy requirements will increase these even more.This will not increase affordable housing but will make it easier for investors to take over neighborhoods.This causes more cars coming and going along with more noise and disruption from the constant stream of people.Please don't make these changes.Margaret Miller 3/16/2023 15:46 Baylee White HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Draft-Comments Attached are The Road Home's public comments for Salt Lake City's HOME-ARP allocation plan draft.We from The Road Home appreciate Salt Lake City's diligence in reviewing the community's needs and evaluating best uses of funds for Salt Lake City.Please let us know if you have any questions or would like to discuss further.Thank you!Baylee Whits 3/16/2023 15:47 Kathy Larkin Northpoint small area Good afternoon,Thank you for your email-I would like to vote IN FAVOR of the Northpoint Small Area Plan.I own property at 2828 North 2200 West SLC-we have our landscaping business,a hobby farm,greenhouse and apiary located on the property.We enjoy our time there,however,we are of retirement age and this is a wonderful opportunity for us to sell and receive enough money to live on.The area already has 5 large warehouses built and another 400 acres across the street from us being developed.We understand this is how the area is moving and we have property that could accommodate the continuing growth.Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter,Sincerely,Kathy Larkin 3/17/2023 11:38 Devin Zander Highland Drive Reconstruction-D/7 Hi Amy,I hope this email finds you well.My name is Devin,I am one of your constituents living in Highland Park.I am a cyclist and a public transportation user and I use Highland Drive daily to get to work.I was hoping that the city would reconsider the multi-use path on Highland Drive.The multi-use path eliminates the south bike lane that we currently have,and does not provide adequate bicycle/pedestrian traffic mitigation.Please consider the attached layout instead of the multi-use path.Not only would it provide shade to both pedestrians and cyclists,it would also make it so the bus would not need to cut off the bike lane when they make stops.Thank you so much for your consideration,Devin Zander"Attachment 1 3/17/2023 15:25 Lon a.Jenkins Letter re comment on ADU ordinance Please see the attached letter.Thank you.Lon Jenkins"Attachment 2 3/17/2023 15:26 Lyndal Cole THANKS! I am celebrating,this St.Patrick's Day,the awesome experience of having Liberty Park return to the neighborhood community.I have lived in this neighborhood for almost 50 years and I,my children and my grandchildren have joyfully used the park daily until this last year.The many encampments in Liberty Park were oppressive,safety risks and prohibited the free usage of the space by the surrounding community.Until this morning,I have felt cheated of my tax investment for a green,open space for safe play,exercise and outdoor enjoyment.So,I write today to express my gratitude for the clearing and cleaning of the park and re-posting of no camping signs.I will resume my daily usage with much appreciation and the hope of continued patrolling 4—f—i.. _f rho lo... 1.� A. l r-lo .. Opened 3/17/2023 18:52 Devin Zander ADU Tenant Transportation Needs I worry that by focusing too much on ADUs the city fails to address the need for safe public streets for people biking and walking.From my experience on my street,more ADUs comes with more cars in the neighborhood. There are streets in our city that do not have bike lanes such as 1300 E,State Street,and Redwood Road,and 2100 S.This makes it very difficult to get where I need to go without a car.To curb the induction of additional traffic in our neighborhoods,I am asking that the city makes bold action to achieve Vision Zero by commiting to safe bike lanes on*every major arterial road*in the city in conjunction with any extra ADU permissions.The action you take now will literally save lives by reducing vehicle miles travelled,reducing pollution,increasing public transportation use,as well reducing the traffic in our neighborhoods.Thank you for your consideration. 3/20/2023 8:58 Jan ellen BURTON North pointe--Wa rehouse Jobs I previously spoke out at the city council meeting on March 7 regarding my opposition to the rezoning of the Northpointe area.I have since been checking out warehouse jobs.The average full time warehouse worker in the US is paid$32,744 per year or$15.74/hour.The entry level salary is typically$29,250.--this is according to google,and of course this varies some from state to state.However,there are a number of jobs currently available to substantiate that claim.A warehouse employee would not typically make more than$38,000 per year.Not"high paying",by any means.A warehouse manager in Utah can get$66,750/year.In Wyoming,this could be$80,000.Of course,Utah is lower paying with the minimum wage still being$7.25.The warehouse manager is in charge of ALL the operations.Information regarding the Elwood Inland Port in Illinois(the largest inland port)indicates about 60%of the jobs are temporary or supplied by temporary agencies—no benefits. Someone at a meeting said the percentage of non-permanent workers in warehouses was about 63%--so, similar statistics.The US Federal Poverty Guidelines used to determine financial eligibility for certain programs sets the 2023 guidelines for the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia at$30,000 for a family of 4. So,do we want to set up jobs so the people of Utah can apply for federal subsidies?Where does this make sense?Additionally,by adding warehouses we are increasing the health risks for the overall population of SLC. Why would we add LOW paying jobs in areas particularly at risk for health problems,when the people who have those jobs cannot afford health insurance?Jan Ellen Burton 3/20/2023 9:29 Adam Gmyrek Apathetic council leadership in SLC,UT. Council members,It is a shame that our city leadership has chosen to do nothing about the public health and safety issues taking place in Warm Springs Park and along Victory Rd in SLC,UT.The conditions are beyond appalling.This is a prime example of the horrific SLC leadership hlthat has and continues to embolden and enable the actions of vagrants,squatters,and the homeless.I look forward to receiving the councils rethorical and feckless response as to why the our leaders have chosen to allow this blantant public health and safety issues in a City Park and along a common thoroughfare?Signed,A disillusioned and fedup Westside resident. 3/20/2023 9:33 Jim Jenkin ADU TEXT AMENDMENT Dear Council Members,I strongly object to any relaxation of the owner property occupancy requirement for ADU's,primarily on the basis that it would negatively impact the affordability of housing in Salt Lake City.My 1400 sq ft 1920's home in the Avenues,is already a target for rental investors,should I sell.I could not currently afford to convert my garage to an ADU,but an investor probably could,bringing the potential gross income closer to$2500 a month,or$2,000 a week as a short term rental.I respectfully submit that Salt Lake City does not have a comprehensive method for policing short term rentals,but,either short term or monthly, removing the owner occupancy requirement for ADU's would make eligible homes across the City a target for real estate investors,driving up prices.Residential buyers cannot,in general,compete with commercial interests.If the City wishes to retain housing stock in the reach of residential buyers,creating more competition with commercial owners is contraindicated,and 1,therefore,strongly support the retention of owner occupancy requirements for ADUs.Respectfully submitted,Jim Jenkin .. Opened 3/20/2023 9:33 Rhianna Riggs ADUs Hello,As a resident of the Central City neighborhood for the past 16 years,I have and continue to see multiple single-family homes being demolished and replaced with high-rise apartment buildings.Considering Central City consists of only 16%owner-occupied housing,I feel that removing the owner-occupancy requirement from the ordinance will negatively impact our already low rate of owner-occupied housing and stock,and make it more difficult for people wanting to purchase a home in a walkable neighborhood.Additionally,if an out-of-state investor purchases the property,there is the potential for zero accountability to their tenants and/or their neighbors for how they manage the property.Please take this into consideration before making a decision.Thank you for your time,Rhianna Riggs 3/20/2023 9:49 Cm Crompton Affordable Housing Incentive Hello Mr.Dugan,After reading and re-reading all the potential stipulations for AHI I am deeply concerned. These issues need extensive discussion and thoughtful mitigation.I am concerned about rentals,considering the units in my neighborhood are characterized by neglect.The city seems to have no concern or clout in dealing with numerous rational,dignified concerns and complaints.What will the future bring?Even more parking problems?The snow plow often passes Amanda due to on street parking,some from houses on Ninth So.and the U.Catering to greedy developers,we've seen our share,is not going to solve housing problems. What about the integrity of neighborhoods?My simple bungalow is not red meat for unmanageable growth.I value my privacy and the quality of my old home.I have chosen to live in a calm neighborhood.This is the social contract I have made and kept for years.Many others have done the same.How can I continue this essential discussion?Regards,Constance Crompton. .. Opened 3/20/2023 14:50 Lonnie Newman 1/2 North point small area Dear Salt Lake City Council,I am writing to you to express my support for the North Point small area rezoning plan.As a concerned citizen,and an avid hunter in the state of Utah.I visited the area in question to see the effects I feel,that can affect the hunting and growth of the area.I was looking to see if the zoning could disturb the flight paths of water fowl or if it would be more acceptable as commercial use to the Salt Lake Valley.I listened last week to the zoom meeting of an individual stating he worked on Hill Air Force Base,and his concerns.First,I would like to say as a retired Air Force member,I do believe Hill Air Force Base has no input on any land issues that does not directly affect the base itself.I feel that the gentleman that mentioned the base and not supporting the North Point Small Area Plan,was using that for his personal gain and is uneducated on the military's stand toward states personal business.I for one will say,that was in the military(retired now) and now works on Hill Air Force Base,it brings in business around in support of the base itself.By brining in business for its support,those businesses will start bringing in other businesses,which will expand our states economy and population.Just buy these actions the state must make decisions for these businesses and population to survive in Utah.Sometimes these decisions require land to be expanded,and that land can turn in to sell from personal land to commercial land.With that said,this is where the decisions can affect people, their living,their right to use the land as personal activity,which intern does seem to be an issue.As a hunter,I visited the land in question to see how that land will affect me as a waterfowl hunter and the business expansion in Utah.As I looked at the land,I did not see any effect on the rezoning for me on hunting.In fact,it will be better,even if it does go up for commercial sale,because the land,even though it's not developed,it still does not help me on hunting waterfowl.Reason is,it is private,and it is by areas where buildings are,and hunting cannot be permitted.I do see though,the pros on rezoning the land to commercial use,because most of the land around there is already in commercial use or being constructed now..So,the land in question that is up for rezoning,I feel it should be zoned for commercial use,just for the fact that it will allow businesses to move in there,rather than to seek other land that can be more important to the effects of a hunting or wildlife management.The land in question is right next to the interstate,it does not affect the flight path of the waterfowl and it basically helps the expansion of commercial land to be isolated in one area at a time.I do believe that economics is important for the state and when economic growth happens,land like this will benefit the growth of the Salt Lake Valley.With three major intrastates crossing here in the Salt Lake Valley, this is a major pro for transportation and movement of supplies and materials to different parts of the country. Salt Lake can be a major hub of these areas being that they have these intersections,and next to the international airport. 3/20/2023 14:50 Lonnie Newman 2/2 CONTINUEDI I North point small area I do feel,that all the Great Salt Lake basin areas should be looked at and protected for future use of the for the Utah people and tourist.The land in question on the North Point,I do not feel like it will affect anything for the hunting or waterfall movement coming from the north during the fall,or future preservation of the Great Salt Lake Basin.That little bit of land that I observed,I feel and I'm,(I'm not an expert),does not affect the waterfowl or any of the wildlife around that area that has already been pushed off from the building going on around it,plus there is plenty of land for them to move to for the ground animals and the waterfowl will stay on their normal paths.This is just my personal opinion;I feel that the land in question would be no problem to be zoned for commercial use.By doing so,this can possibly save other land in areas that might be in question, which could have a bigger effect on waterfowl or the wildlife in those areas if moved to a different location. Again,I am not speaking for HAFB but I am speaking for the businesses it brings in for support of it,and the businesses that support them.I am also looking at the big picture of the Salt Lake Valley with the interstates, the airport,the logistics for that land I feel,is a great investment for commercial property to help the Salt Lake Valley and Utah's expansion and population growth.Sincerely,Lonnie Newman .. Opened 3/20/2023 14:51 Dave Brach ADU comment My wife Can and I have been following the ADU"debate"since we moved to Salt Lake in 2004.The first time around(-2008)we were warned the sky was going to fall if they were legalized.But of course it did not. Nobody even noticed.And it won't fall this time if we make them easier to build,including removing the owner occupancy requirement.Change is tough but it's not the 1980s anymore and we need more density in our noiahhnrhnnrlc navy PL-rh fari Dinknle ki 3/20/2023 14:52 Jeffrey Stevens 1/2 Comments to Proposed Amendment related to Unfortunately I will be out of town and unable to attend the public hearing on the amendments proposed in ADUs and Petition No.PLNPCM2022-00475 response to Petition No.PLNPCM2022-00475 pertaining to accessory dwelling unit regulations.Please accept and consider these comments.I have been a resident of SLC for 30 years.SLC has some wonderful residential neighborhoods.I understand the affordable housing concern which is a problem that has existed in many urban areas for decades,but seems to be a growing issue within the last decade for SLC.This is a stubborn problem with no clear solution,therefore,any proposed solutions should be undertaken with due consideration that the proposed solutions do not negatively impact the aspects of the city that are working and successful,like the existing flourishing and vibrant neighborhoods,especially when the ultimate probability of success of these proposed solutions are unknown and likely low.I appreciate the work that has gone into the proposed amendments to temper them from some of the proposals that were under consideration.The following are some specific thoughts I would like to share with the council:1.Neighborhood Specificity. Overlaying the same ADU regulations on all neighborhoods seems to present a high risk of doing more harm than good to a number of the unique neighborhoods that are a remarkable asset to the SLC.I suggest adopting a process to develop ADU regulations that better tailored to specific neighborhoods to take into account their unique attributes.2.Setbacks.I suggest keeping the current setbacks to reduce the risk of negative impacts to neighbors of shading and noise.The addition of another dwelling unit with 2-3 bedrooms close to an existing SFR will certainly alter the environment for the neighboring SFR and may do so to such an extent to cause current residents to move from their existing residence.3.Parking.I suggest keeping the current parking requirements,especially in the older neighborhoods where much of the properties were constructed without off-street parking.People living in SLC will be car owners,notwithstanding alternative modes of transportation. Even if not used every day,ADU residents will need a place to put their vehicles,which will likely be 1 per inhabitant.Many of the older neighborhoods already do not have sufficient on-street parking for the current residents.Bringing more vehicles to these neighborhoods will negatively impact the current residents.At a minimum,I would remove the exception for 1/4 mi.from a bike lane.There are many bike lanes that appear to be established but then later neglected,like 800 east and 600 east for example.Unlike a bike path,many bike lanes do not provide a meaningful transportation alternative,and neither provide a reasonable alternative in the winter.Similarly,the exception for transit stops should be limited to Trax stops,and not bus stops.Rider numbers on buses are not robust in SLC on most routes,and being close to a bus stop provides little,if any, reliable indication that a resident will not own and park a vehicle. .. Opened 3/20/2023 14:52 Jeffrey Stevens 2/2 CONTINUEDII Comments to Proposed 4.Ownership requirement.I appreciate that the amendments retain an ownership requirement.This is Amendment related to ADUs and Petition No. essential to ensure that ADUs are not a gateway to corporate or investor property owners pricing individuals PLNPCM2022-00475 out of the housing market.I suggest removing duplexes from the exception to the ownership requirement. Duplexes are often located amongst SFRs.Adding another rental unit to a duplex will certainly put these properties out of reach of individual home buyers and into the exclusive ownership of corporate and investor owners.Owner-occupied duplexes offer a good entry into the housing market for individuals,and owner- occupied duplexes would be eligible for ADUs.However,adding the right to append a third,sizeable,rental unit to a duplex will likely remove the owner-occupied duplex option for individuals.Individuals will not be able to compete with corporate or investor owners that will pay based on the cash flow generated from three units.Unlike corporate and investor purchasers,individual home-owners will be stretched to obtain the financing just to buy the duplex,they will not have the resources or the credit to compile enough money to both purchase the duplex and build an ADU.This will put the individual home-owner at an insurmountable disadvantage to obtain this housing type.Thank you for your consdieraton.Jeffrey Stevens Avenues Resident. 3/20/2023 14:53 David Tanner ADU's It seems to me that in your hast to align yourself's with the developers realtors,contractors and those that contribute for your elections you have lost sight of the very people you were elected to represent.I wonder what purpose the zoning serves when the people buying into any community are looking at the various zoning restrictions.They look at schools neighborhoods upkeep of the houses.Local business's churches all the things that are meaningful when buying into a community.My house is an investment and as such I expect to have the zoning enforced not changed at a whim.Example Ivory homes in the aves.Why were you so in a hurry to satisfy Ivory over the interests of the entire avenues community.It was an orchestrated show so you could satiate your own conscience.You ar now moving to disregard more of the zoning that was put iin place by previous councils rules and regulations that were put in place to protect residents from the very thing you are proposing.It is after all ALL ABOUT THE MONEY.In the Aves when the streets are being torn up for utilities (which the will).They are dated and I see people digging up their plumbing all the time.That should tell you that the piping under the streets are out dated and need replacing.Are the contractors going to be held responsible for the replacement?When you add more demand it will fail.I will attend the 7 PM meeting,why I don't know.The last one I went to the members sat at the tables and were on their phones or visiting all the time people were addressing the committee.At this one please have them turned off and pay attention to the owners.Respect the owners by paying attention.They feel it is important.Thanks 3/20/202314:58 Michael McFadden Proposed ADU rule changes I write you to suggest seperating the owner-occupancy rule from the other suggested changes.The footprint of my post-war Sugar House home is only about 800 square feet on the quarter-acre lot.The current sizing rules make an ADU unworkable even though there is ample land for one.Owner-occupancy is,no doubt,a difficult issue.Regardless,we need more flexaility concerning building footprints and setbacks.Thank you for your timo .. Opened 3/20/2023 16:31 Kelly Stevens 1/2 ADU's Hello,I am unable to attend the meeting on March 21.Here are my thoughts:I have lived in the Avenues for 25 years and love it.I own a single family home and two tri-plexes.I keep my rents low and am very careful to keep the peace with my neighbors living near my triplexes.I understand affordable housing is an issue and appreciate the work that has gone into the proposed amendments to help fix the problem.1.Setbacks.I suggest keeping the current setbacks to reduce the risk of negative impacts to neighbors of shading and noise. The addition of another dwelling unit with 2-3 bedrooms close to an existing SFR will certainly alter the environment for the neighboring SFR and may do so to such an extent to cause current residents to move from their existing residence.2.Parking.I suggest keeping the current parking requirements,especially in the older neighborhoods where much of the properties were constructed without off-street parking.People living in SLC will be car owners,notwithstanding alternative modes of transportation.Even if not used every day,ADU residents will need a place to put their vehicles,which will likely be 1 per inhabitant.Many of the older neighborhoods already do not have sufficient on-street parking for the current residents.Bringing more vehicles to these neighborhoods will negatively impact the current residents.At a minimum,I would remove the exception for 1/4 mi.from a bike lane.There are many bike lanes that appear to be established but later neglected,like 800 east and 600 east for example.Unlike a bike path,many bike lanes do not provide a meaningful transportation alternative.Similarly,the exception for transit stops should be limited to Trax stops, and not bus stops.Rider numbers on buses are not robust in SLC on most routes and being close to the bus stop provides very little,if any,reliable indication that a resident will not own and park a vehicle.3.Ownership requirement.I appreciate that the amendments retain an ownership requirement.This is essential to ensure that ADUs are not a gateway to corporate or investor property owners pricing individuals out of the housing market.I suggest removing duplexes from the exception to the ownership requirement.Duplexes are often located amongst SFRs.Adding another rental unit to a duplex will certainly put these properties out of reach of individual home buyers and into the exclusive ownership of corporate and investor owners.Owner-occupied duplexes offer a good entry into the housing market for individuals,and owner-occupied duplexes would be eligible for ADUs.However,adding the right to append a third,sizable,rental unit to the duplex will very likely remove the owner-occupied duplex option for individuals.They will not be able to compete with corporate or investor owners that will pay based on the cash flow generated from three units.Unlike corporate and investor purchasers,individual home-owners will be stretched to obtain the financingjust to buy the duplex,they will not have the resources or the credit to compile enough money to both purchase the duplex and build an ADU. 3/20/2023 16:31 Kelly Stevens 2/2 CONTINUEDH ADU's This will put the individual home-owner at an insurmountable disadvantage to obtain this housing type.4. Institutional investors will outcompete private owners trying to buy properties.In Phoenix one company owns 3000 properties to rent out.The American dream can not compete with these purchasers.5.Prices will be driven up by corporate investors who will rent them out at higher rates with an eye for the bottom line not for _ a healthv hanov neiehborhood.My best.Kellv Stevens 3/20/2023 16:33 Jim BROWN Accessory Dwelling Units Dear Council Why would you think ADU's would be beneficial to any neighborhood.I have lived within the zoning regulations in this city for many,many years and have never seen anything more ridiculous than this other than proposals by Ivory homes.All this will do is crowd the existing neighborhoods and ultimately reduce my property value and destroy my privacy.I did not sign up for this change in my neighborhood.Lets just limit the growth so we dont become another overcrowded undesirable city like may others around the country. Quality not quantity for hell sakes.I insist you do away completely with this proposal l Sincerly Jim&Kim brown 3/21/2023 13:42 Cathy Cunningham ADUs in Local Historic Districts Hello,Please support(or continue to support)that ADUs in Local Historic Districts and pending Local Historic Districts should follow ALL Salt Lake City's existing Historic Districts building guidelines,requirements, inspections.and annrovals.Cathv Cunningham District 6 .. Opened 3/21/2023 13:43 Skyler Peterson Northpoint Small Area Plan Dear Salt Lake City Council Members,I'm writing to you in hopes of you approving the Northpoint Small Area Plan tomorrow.As a long time real estate agent in Salt Lake City,I could go on and on about the benefits of industrial warehousing on the economy and the end consumer(your constituents).Without digressing further, I ask you to please finally put this matter to rest tomorrow and vote to approve the Northpoint Small Area Plan. Thank you for your consideration.Sincerely,Skyler Peterson, 3/21/2023 13:45 Nigel Swaby Comments on ADU Ordinance-Fairpark CC Please see the attached letter concerning the ADU ordinance.Regards,Nigel Swaby **Attachment 3 3/21/2023 13:47 Douglas Rollins ADUs in Local Historic Districts I believe that present Salt Lake City Historic District building guidelines,requirements,inspections,and approvals should apply to ADUs in existing and pending Local Historic Districts.I welcome your support.Doug Rollins 3/21/2023 17:10 Constance Crompton ADU Density does nor equal affordability.Proposed changes will create an open season for developers in/out of state and easy access for parents wishing to buy/build and relocate students to avoid out-of-state tuition. These situations will not enrich or provide stability for our old neighborhood.Increasing size specifications will infringe on light,freshair and privacy,a social contract we made when we invested in our homes(all sizes, shapes etc).Our narrow streets are not desind for traffic congestion.Please consider these concerns,yes even 4e�.� ATTACHMENT 1 0 t tmap - LON A. JENKINS ATTACHMENT 2 Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 801-661-5414 March 17, 2023 Re: Proposed Revisions to ADU Ordinance Salt Lake City Council (council.commentsna sic og_v com) Dear City Council Members: I wish to voice my strong opposition to any revision to Salt Lake City's Accessory Dwelling Unit("ADU") ordinance which would remove or eliminate the owner occupancy requirement. I am a resident of Salt Lake City's Avenues neighborhood and I am convinced that the elimination of the owner occupancy requirement will accomplish little more than destroying the character of many Salt Lake City neighborhood and,indeed,diminish the quality of life enjoyed by many Salt Lake City residents. As you have no doubt heard from many opponents to the proposed measure,the net effect of eliminating the owner occupancy requirement will likely be to encourage and incentivize investors and developers of all types(institutional and otherwise)to purchase property(presently developed or undeveloped)for the construction of ADUs which will lead to an explosion of what essentially will be non-owner occupied duplexes. This cannot be the intent nor can it be tolerated. In addition,to incentivize investors to purchase properties may well have the effect of increasing the price of real estate and pricing out of the market even more potential home purchasers. Again, it is difficult to believe that you desire that outcome. Certainly,there exists a housing shortage in Salt Lake City and solutions must be formulated. However,as City leaders,you are charged with advancing policies and solutions which must be viewed through a long-term lens,not a quick"band-aid." That is what leadership requires. A knee-jerk reaction to solving an immediate problem by creating long-term problems is not a strategy which should be employed by effective leaders. Rather, solving difficult,pressing problems requires careful and thoughtful deliberation and planning by our elected leaders. We expect nothing less. Please keep your obligations to the City and its residents in mind as you consider any changes to the existing ADU ordinance. And please do not think that this is an issue which would only impact east side residents and it is they who are voicing the loudest opposition. Indeed,residents of Salt Lake City's west side may be most acutely impacted negatively by the elimination of the owner occupant requirement. Property on Salt Lake City's west side is generally less expensive and investors and developers may have even greater incentive to purchase less expensive property in those locations and to construct non-owner occupied ADUs. In fact, a proliferation of investor owned ADUs would only serve to oust potential west side home buyers from the housing market due to increased housing prices and to destroy the character of cherished west side neighborhoods. All residents of Salt Lake City—west side and east side alike—deserve a far more thoughtful,careful approach to addressing Salt Lake City's housing shortage than a short-sighted attempt to eliminate the ADU ordinance's owner occupancy requirement. I urge you to consider these comments as well as the comments of many other opponents as you consider revisions to the ADU ordinance. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely,j Lon A. Jenkins cc: Chris Wharton(chris.wharton@slc ov com) ATTACHMENT 3 Fairpark Community Council Nigel Swaby Salt Lake City Corp Chair 451 S State St. Salt Lake City,UT 84111 Salt Lake City,UT 84116 (801)634-4950 March 17,2023 Salt Lake City Council Attn:Chair Darin Mano We are writing to you to express our concern about the accessory dwelling unit(ADU) ordinance you are currently considering changing.At our February meeting we had the benefit of listening to three council members discuss the proposal.The biggest concern was removing the occupancy requirement.Fairpark Community Council sits in the heart of the most affordable homes in the City.We fear investors hoping to capitalize on the new ADU ordinance would increase competition for home buyers seeking to live in the home and drive up home prices to a completely unsustainable level. As Chair of this council,I'm often approached by neighbors about aggressive mailers and phone calls from investors seeking to buy homes in the community.I get several of them myself each week.For some of my older neighbors,they are fearful of these marketing tactics.Removing the owner occupancy provision would only embolden investors to market to our community more. We are supportive of the other elements of the ADU ordinance and hope you can find a way to lower the City's fees and provide financing so more members of the community can take advantage of the opportunity.At our February meeting which had over 20 people in attendance in person and online,we unanimously agreed we want the ordinance to require owner occupancy.We are also opposed to any sort of automatic revocation of the requirement in the future.Investors will still compete if they know they can get a guaranteed extra unit in the near future. Sincerely, Nigel Swaby A I � D �. COMMUN/T At V COUNCIL